UEOV OFF. OF ENV. RFF. TEL:1-904-922-6200
.xecutivf OfCTirp of the Go'vernor
Offic' of Planning and Budgefing,
The CspiLol, Room 150IS t
Tallaharsee, Florida 3W i 23"
CC: &hene: L22-
r l IIII
Number of pages inclIdin: cover helc
PAULA L. ALLEN
S XNIOR GOVwRMKNTAL AHALTLTr
SOOoNol4ICe DVILOPMUNT POIwcr UNlr
Oi ClF Or PLAMNNIN & BUbObLTIN
l RuKmr VFPPICI OF Tor MovaIuNOR 1 ELsOLNI:
Prry* nn, (SMI A.lEUIi
(ADA!t A*7&DOh I
7: TAI.APHE H maB A1Btse-Bt-OI BumeCM:a "S7-5
! paulenrie iJI iclaal lann PAN" (od1 a24100
jF or your rGiw O rcplpy ASAP
9:06 No.003 P.01
REMIARKS. U. Ur;CiI
D Plleam comment
GOU OFF. OF ENO. AFF. TEL:1-904-922-6230 Jan 23,97 9:37 ,j3.003 P.02
GLUCKIMAN & GLUCKMAN
Attorneys ct low
511 Old Magnollo Road
Crawfordvlle. Florida 39327
Ttl: Water Funding Core Group
From:r Phil Parson, Co-chair
Date: January 22, 1997
This transmission contains 4 page including this cover shct.
m a ............. -a ~ a ..... ----- ----- ----- ---- ---- ---- ----a a -....................---- ---
As ynnr dralting group, we have attempted to include all the ideas and
positions on which this group reached consensus (or appeared to). This attempt .
resulted in the draft which follows. PleaI. review the attached draft and be prepared
to discuss it when we meet on Wednesday, January 29. Please also identify any
issues which we missed in preparing the draft.
i : .
GO.U OFF. OF ENV. AFF. TEL:1-904-922-6203 Jan 23.97 9:07 i 003 P.03
WATUR S UIF-LY FUNDING CORE GROUP
January 23, 1997
To review existing ifnding authority for water resource development and water
supply development and recommend new funding as necessary.
Therc is considerable existing revenue-raising authority fur water projects at the
local, regional and state levels. However, increasing water demand and limited
natural resources suggest that limited new revenue 1,unres are needed to meet a
few specific circumstances.
1. General principles:
a. Bcneciciaries of water projects should pay the costs of the projects from which
b. Water management districts should take the lead in identifying and
implementing water resource develpTIment projects. Most regionally significant
water resource projects should I paid for through water management district
v. Local governments and water utilities should take the lead in identifying and
implementing water supply development projects. Most water supply projects
should continue to be paid for through local water users and other local funding
d. An entity with revenue-raising authority should have the ability to allocate those
funds and should not be mandated to spend those funds on a particular program or
2. The Regional Water Supply Plans developed and adopted by the water
ananagemenl dislriclR should provide the framework for identifying water resource
development projects, water supply development needs, reasonably available water
GOy OFF. OF ENV. FFF. TEL:1-904-922-6200 Jan 23,97 9:07 No.003 P.04
sources, and options to assist local government and water supply decision-makers in
identifying funding needs.
3. It appears there is n red for water resources development. These needs are best
identified through the Regional Water Supply Plans. Each water maniagemetnt
district's Plan should include both existing funding and additional funding needs to
carry out their responsibilities as these water resource dei.velopmien goals are
4. Each Regional Water Supply Plan should include the amount of funding; the
source of funds, where appropriate; and the existence of any funding shortfalls for
the implementation of the water management district responsibilities identified in
5. The water supply and water resource problems of the Lower East Coast are
different from other areas in the state and may require a unique funding solution.
6. To meet existing and future local capital needs for production of water supply,
local governments and water utilities should be given additional revenue-raising
While local referenda requirements should not be attached to any additional
authority provided, the following policies should be required to provide
local governments should expressly articulate the public policy
considerations for selecting the new funding source, how the money will be
spent and the relationship to other existing sources of funding for water
local governments may use the new money on projects of primarily local
impact, but, if the project will have interjurisdictional impacLs, the project
must serve a regional purpose and avoid interjurisdicional conflict.
if private water utilities exist in the area, a local government accessing these
new funding sources must allow the private utility to share in these monies
since the utilities' customeNr will contribute to the payment of these taxes.
these new monies Imust not be used to replace, supplant or support the
diversion ,f existing levels of funding for water projects for use on projects or
activities unrelated to water.
7. There should be new funding to allow the districts or state to provide limited
funding for projects which contribute to the greater public good. To be of "greater
public good", a project must be of regional or statewide significance, must support
the strategies of the Regional Water Supply Plan and musnt:
create a nearby, dependable, sustainable supply of water which is not
otherwise financially feasible through use of other available funding sources,
i I J I. ,|
GO0 OFF. OF ENV. AFF.
S..- L-oLU Jan 23,97 9:OS ,. 003 P.05
be economically or environmentally superior in preventing or limitiJng
adverse areawide water resource impacts but which is initially more
expensive than other potential alternatives, or
make significant implementation of reuse or conservation of water in a
manner which contributes to the sustainability of regional water sources.
8. It is in the long-term best interest of Florida for the Legislature adopt enabling
legislation and to appropriate the required 20% matching funds to allow the use of a
revolving loan fund through access to new mnoncys available under the
amendments to the federal Safe Drinking Water Act.
State appropriation of $8.8 million for federal FY 1997 generates a total of
State appropriation of $6.9 million for federal FY 1998 generates a total of
9. Given the likelihood of limited new funding and recognizing the various types
of problems which need to be addressed, the Legislature should consider providing
further public policy direction on prioritizing the use of new funding.
The drafting group has reviewed the definitions for "water supply development
and "water resources development" as currently proposed by the Planning
Committee. We suggest that the Funding Committee adopt the following changes:
"Water resources development" means the formulation and implementation of
regional water resource management strategies, including the collection and
evaluation of surface water and groundwater data; non-structural programs-to
plect water sources: the development of regional water resource implementation
programs; and the construction, operation and maintenance of major public works
Facilities to provide for flood control, surface and underground water storage, and
groundwater recharge augmentation; and tectical assistance to loal govg.nmgents
and water utilities.
"Water supply development" means the planning, design, construction, operation,
and maintenance of public or private facilities for water collection, treatment,
transmission and distribution for sale, resale, or end use.
"! .. '