Title: Opinion File 69-13
Full Citation
Permanent Link: http://ufdc.ufl.edu/WL00003282/00001
 Material Information
Title: Opinion File 69-13
Physical Description: Book
Language: English
Spatial Coverage: North America -- United States of America -- Florida
Abstract: Buddy Blain's Collections - Opinion File 69-13
General Note: Box 14, Folder 2 ( Opinion File 1961-1971 - 1961-1971 ), Item 70
Funding: Digitized by the Legal Technology Institute in the Levin College of Law at the University of Florida.
 Record Information
Bibliographic ID: WL00003282
Volume ID: VID00001
Source Institution: Levin College of Law, University of Florida
Holding Location: Levin College of Law, University of Florida
Rights Management: All rights reserved by the source institution and holding location.

Full Text


MEMO TO: L. M. Blain
Re: Possession Inquiry Notice

Possession of land is constructive notice to all te wt14d of
whatever rights the occupants have in the land. Whin Lsoession
is opn, visible and exclusive it will put those aituiiyn
any title to or a lien on the land on inquiry to a*0ert.in the
nature of the rights of the occupants. Portland C~meit vs
Roper 67 So. 115 (1914) one who acquires title or an interest
in land with constructive notice of the actual poslessaon and
occupancy of the land by one other than the vendor tak*g subject
to whatever,rights as proper inquiry will disclose.
The nature of the occupant's rights may be shown by any use of
the land that indicates an intention to appropriate it'for
the benefit of the possessor. Such use may be any to which the
land is adapted and is calculated to apprise the Wtld that the
property is occupied by claim of right thereon. (Fla. iJr.Notice
Section 7).

Whatever fairly puts a person on inquiry is sufficient notice
where the means of knowledge are at hand (Recdrd Netice) and
if he omits to inquire, he is then chargeable with all the
facts with which by proper inquiry he might have aeoerikined.
Am. Jur. Section 12.
What constitutes sufficient possession to put one on notice is
a question of fact. In Miller vs Green 58 NW bi7 R 2A4 7;04
wherein 2 acres out of 63 acres had been plowed an4 a pile of
manure had been placed samko A on the land (the plc*d aareage
visible from the highway), it was held that the above facts were
sufficient to put a subsequent purchaser on notice as to the
rights of the possessor.
In George vs Stansburg 111 S. E. 598 held that hauling dirt on to
a vacant lot was sufficient to be constructive notice to a
subsequent purchaser so as to require him to inquire as to the
rights of the party in possession.


July 2, 19 69.

C --<-'e

(|)W ^ 7 I

University of Florida Home Page
© 2004 - 2010 University of Florida George A. Smathers Libraries.
All rights reserved.

Acceptable Use, Copyright, and Disclaimer Statement
Last updated October 10, 2010 - - mvs