1 THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN SCHOOL COUNSELOR SELF EFFICACY AND THE RATE OF GRADUATION FOR MALES AT URBAN, PREDOMINANTLY AFRICAN AMERICAN, UNDERPERFORMING HIGH SCHOOLS By SOPHIE MAXIS A DISSERTATION PRESENTED TO THE GRADUATE SC HOOL OF THE UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA 2011
2 2011 Sophie Maxis
3 To my Mother, for your love, sacrifices, and early morning singing Thank you for s haring the love of God to me and for demonstrating a heart for service
4 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I thank God for unconditional love and strength to persist in the completion of this experience. Also, i t has been an honor to learn and serve with so many individu als during my doctoral studies. This accomplishment was made more meaningful with their encouragement, insight and prayers. I thank my committee members for guiding me through this research experience. Thanks go out to Dr. Mary Ann Clark for her confidence in my abilities, leadership and consistent support. She continues to be a mentor, role model, advisor and dear friend to me at all the right times. I thank Dr. Bernard Oliver for modeling a tireless passion and optimism for the success of young people. I am grateful for his, and Dr. Eileen Dr. Ellen Amatea for their contributions to my development as a scholar and researcher. I am honored to co labor with my teammates a t the University of Florida (UF) Alliance program. They shared in the ups and downs of a work that will never be complete. I am constantly inspired by their enthusiasm and hard work on behalf of first generation students to college. I thank Diana Negrn Reyes (looking forward to soon celebrating with Dr. Negrn Reyes), Dr. Diane Archer Banks, Ms. Lucianna Grasso, the students, teachers, and administrators of the UF Alliance partner schools. I am blessed because of my Mother, Simone, who is my first teach er. She diligently gave all that she had and the best of herself to secure a better life for her children. For this gift, I will always be indebted to my Mummy. prayers, and laughter mean more to me than I am able to express. I thank them for bearing patiently and gracefully with me during my pause to study. I especially thank
5 Louise and Vidal Richards, Jyrece McClendon, Abijah and Staci Ann Bertrand, Michelle Husbands, Ronn ie Stephenson, Afiba Bertrand, Vickie Vallance, Kisha Bryan, and Cindy their prayers, potl ucks, companionship, and understanding. I especially thank Elder Corliss and Florence Edwards for the gentle reminders of my blessings and that all I thank Francisco Jimenez for his expertise and encouragement during the analys is of my study. For their extra attention to my development as a scholar, I thank Dr. Linda Behar Horenstein, Dr. Cynthia Garvan, Dr. Vivian Lee Dr. John Carey, and Dr. Mary Kay Dykes. I thank the participating schools and professional school counselors w ho graciously let me into their space for my study. I am energized by their hope, commitment and hard work on behalf of urban schools and communities. Finally, I thank my colleagues at Buchholz High. It is a pleasure to serve with a remarkable team of pr ofessional school counselors, administrators, and teachers.
6 TABLE OF CONTENTS page ACKNOWLEDGMENTS ................................ ................................ ................................ .. 4 LIST OF TABLES ................................ ................................ ................................ ............ 9 LIST OF FIGURES ................................ ................................ ................................ ........ 10 ABS TRACT ................................ ................................ ................................ ................... 11 CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION ................................ ................................ ................................ .... 13 Scope of the Problem ................................ ................................ ............................. 15 Starting and Completing High School ................................ ............................... 15 Gaps in Education ................................ ................................ ............................ 16 Role of the School Counselor ................................ ................................ ........... 17 Theoretical Framework ................................ ................................ ........................... 18 Statement of the Problem ................................ ................................ ....................... 19 Need for the Study ................................ ................................ ................................ .. 21 Purpose of the Study ................................ ................................ .............................. 22 Research Questions ................................ ................................ ............................... 23 Hypotheses ................................ ................................ ................................ ............. 23 Definition of Terms ................................ ................................ ................................ .. 24 S ummary ................................ ................................ ................................ ................ 27 2 LITERATURE REVIEW ................................ ................................ .......................... 29 Social Cognitive Theory ................................ ................................ .......................... 29 Self Efficacy ................................ ................................ ................................ ..... 30 Teacher Efficacy ................................ ................................ ............................... 32 School Counselor Self Efficacy ................................ ................................ ........ 34 Challenges and Implications of High School Completion ................................ ........ 39 Significance of the Freshman Year ................................ ................................ .. 39 Risk Factors for Dropping Out ................................ ................................ .......... 40 Consequences of Dropping Out ................................ ................................ ....... 42 Achievement Gaps at Urban Schools ................................ ................................ ..... 43 National Data ................................ ................................ ................................ .... 43 State Data ................................ ................................ ................................ ........ 44 Barriers to African American Male Achievement ................................ .............. 45 Schooling Practices ................................ ................................ .......................... 45 Beliefs about Accountability ................................ ................................ .............. 46 Success Factors for Males at Urban Schools ................................ ................... 47 Implications for Accessing Resources for College ................................ .................. 50 National Stakeholders ................................ ................................ ...................... 51
7 School Counseling and College Access ................................ ........................... 53 Role of School Counselor ................................ ................................ ....................... 54 School Counselors in Urban Settings ................................ ............................... 55 School Counseling and High School Graduation ................................ .............. 56 Summary ................................ ................................ ................................ ................ 57 3 METHODOLOGY ................................ ................................ ................................ ... 60 Setting ................................ ................................ ................................ ..................... 60 Participants ................................ ................................ ................................ ............. 61 Access to Participants ................................ ................................ ............................. 61 Operational Definition of Varia bles ................................ ................................ ......... 61 School Counselor Level Variables ................................ ................................ ... 61 School Level Variables ................................ ................................ ..................... 62 Instrumentation ................................ ................................ ................................ ....... 64 Data Collection ................................ ................................ ................................ ....... 66 Data Anal ysis ................................ ................................ ................................ .......... 67 Summary ................................ ................................ ................................ ................ 69 4 RESULTS ................................ ................................ ................................ ............... 77 Reliability ................................ ................................ ................................ ................ 77 Descriptive Statistics ................................ ................................ ............................... 78 Counselor Level Descriptive Information ................................ .......................... 78 School Level Descriptive Information ................................ ............................... 79 Data Analyses ................................ ................................ ................................ ......... 79 Hypothesis One ................................ ................................ ................................ 81 Hypothesis Two ................................ ................................ ................................ 82 Hypothe sis Three ................................ ................................ ............................. 83 Hypothesis Four ................................ ................................ ............................... 83 Hypothesis Five ................................ ................................ ................................ 84 Summary ................................ ................................ ................................ ................ 85 5 DISCUSSION ................................ ................................ ................................ ......... 96 Discussion ................................ ................................ ................................ .............. 96 Limitations ................................ ................................ ................................ ............. 102 Implications for Theory ................................ ................................ .......................... 103 Implications for Practice ................................ ................................ ........................ 103 Recommendations for Future Research ................................ ............................... 105 Conclusion ................................ ................................ ................................ ............ 107 APPENDIX A PERMISSION FOR INSTRUMENTS ................................ ................................ .... 110 B SCHOOL COUNSELOR SELF EFFICACY SCALE ................................ .............. 112
8 C EFFICACY IN STUDENT ENGAGEMENT ................................ ........................... 114 LIST OF REFERENCES ................................ ................................ ............................. 115 BIOGRAPHICAL SKETCH ................................ ................................ .......................... 127
9 LIST OF TABLES Table page 3 1 2008 2009 School membership by category ................................ ................... 70 3 3. School Counselor to Student Ratios ................................ ................................ ... 72 3 4. 2008 2009 Graduation rates ................................ ................................ ............ 73 3 5. 2007 2008 Graduation rates ................................ ................................ ............ 74 3 6 Counselor and School Level Data ................................ ................................ ...... 75 3 7 Results from One Way Random Effects Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) Model ................................ ................................ ................................ .................. 76 4 2. School Counselor Self Efficacy (SCE) and Efficacy to Engage African American Male Students (EAME) descriptive statistics ................................ ...... 88 4 3. School level descriptive statistics ................................ ................................ ....... 89 4 4 Results of fixed effects for SCE in Hierarchical Linear Model (HLM) .................. 90 4 5 Results of fixed effects for EAME in HLM ................................ ........................... 91 4 6. Simple statistics for 2009 male graduation rates by partnership affiliation ......... 92 4 7. Group t test for 2009 male graduation rates by partnership affiliation ................ 93 4 8 Results of fixed effects for SCE by graduation rates and partnership affiliation in HLM ................................ ................................ ................................ ................ 94 4 9 Results of fixed effects for EAME by graduation rates and partnership affiliation in HLM ................................ ................................ ................................ 95
10 LIST OF FIGURES Figure page 2 1 efficacy ................................ ............ 31 2 2 School counselor self efficacy ................................ ................................ ............ 38
11 Abstract of Dissertation Presented to the Graduate Sch ool of the University of Florida in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN SCHOOL COUNSELOR SELF EFFICACY AND THE RATE OF GRADUATION FOR MALES AT URBAN, PREDOMINANTLY AFRICAN AMERICAN, UNDERPERFORMING HIGH SCHOOLS By Sophie Maxis August 2011 Chair: Mary Ann Clark Major: School Counseling and Guidance The purpose of this study was to examine the relationship between school counselor self efficacy and the rate of graduation f or males in urban, predominantly African American high schools. Nationally, the underachievement of African American males within public schools has reached alarming heights where fewer than 50%, compared to 78% of White males, are estimated to have gradu ated from high school in 2008. Professional school counselors are highlighted as critical stakeholders who are held accountable for the academic success of students. However, there lacks research linking school counselor self efficacy to student outcomes This study used a survey design to measure school counselor self efficacy and school level variables Graduation rates for males and related school level data were retrieved from the Florida Department of Education website. Sixty four school counselors representing 17 schools and three urban districts in Florida, participated in the study. The data was analyzed by hierarchical linear modeling (HLM) using Statistical Analysis System ( SAS ) programming software.
12 The HLM analyses took into account the var iance that counselor level and school level variables contributed to the full regression model. A significant relationship was not detected between school counselor self efficacy and the rate of high school graduation for males at urban, predominantly Afr ican American, underperforming school. However, having a higher sense of efficacy to engage African American male students was associated with having more years of counseling experience and being a male counselor. Having more years of counseling experien ce and self reported t raining in the implementation of American School Counselor Association ( ASCA ) National Standards were significantly associated with higher perceived efficacy to engage African American male students. The results of the study lend supp ort for the need to solicit more male role models from within urban communities into high needs schools, as well into the school counseling profess ion. As a result of this study, there is an early indication that the use of ASCA National Standards may be beneficial at all school counseling career levels. A dherence to ASCA National Standards may yield positive results in how confidently school counselors feel about working with African American males at high need s school s.
13 CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION With lim ited resources and barriers that are common to challenging school environments, e ducat ors that serve urban, under performing high schools are charged with help ing students complete high school. Al though h ome related factors such as parental involvement, pa home literacy, socioeconomic status and family structure ( Barton, 200 3) account for some of the obstacles to high s chool achievement attention is increasingly given to school related factors that may have greater impact ( Darling Hammond & Friedlaender, 2008; Kennelly & Monrad, 2007a; Rodney, Crafter, Rodney & Mupier, 1999). Among school related factors that affect student achievement are school climate (Hoy, Tarter & Bliss, 1990; Lee & Shute, 2010; Stewart, 2007; Metropolitan Ce nter for Urban Education [MCUE], 2009; Davis & Jordan, 1994) degree of defined expectat ions of student (Barton, 200 3), academic rigor, the quality of interactions between student and educators ( Darling Hammond & Friedlaender, 2008 ) teacher self efficacy (Ashton & Webb, 1986; Tschannen Moran & Barr, 2004) and student self efficacy (Caraway, Tucker, Reinke & Hall, 2003; Walker & Greene, 2009). Further examination of the school related factors of student achievement is useful when considering the large port ion of underserved youth from impoverished communities who can often only rely on school resources to complete high school and access postsecondary education (McDonough, 2004; Wimberly & Noeth, 2004). C risis with male underachievement and drop out in publi c schools is well documented (Alliance for Excellent Education [AEE], 2008; Heckman & LaFontaine, 2010; National Center for Education Statistics [NCES], 2010) Although all students
14 may experience degrees of adjustment problems as they matriculate through high school and prepare for college, minority, urban males fare worse in rates of ninth grade completion ( Akos & Galassi, 2004 ) educational attainment ( Clark, Lee, Goodman & Yacco, 2008 ) and high school completion ( NCES, 2009 ) when compared to their fema le and non minority counterparts. A recent report about Black males and education estimates that 47% of Black males nationally and 37% in Florida graduated from high school in 2008, compared to 78% White males nationally and 57% in Florida (The Schott Fou ndation for Public Education [Schott], 2010). The challenges of male underachievement at urban schools present school counselors with opportunities and challenges for address ing issues of access to resources equity in services received social justice and empowerment. However, there is an absence of research about how the self efficacy beliefs and attitudes of professional school counselors impact student outcomes despite the established evidence about the influence of teacher self efficacy beliefs on stu dent achievement (Ashton & Webb, 1986; Bandura, 1977; Bodenhorn & Skaggs, 2005; Holcomb McCoy, Harris, Hines & Johnston, 2008; Sutton & Fall, 1995). The lack of evidence about the impact of school counselor self efficacy is significant as the roles of the 21 st century school counselor continue to shift and greater emphasis is being placed on how they impact student outcomes (American School Counselor Association [ASCA] National Model, 2005; The Education Trust [Ed Trust], 2009). An investigation into how school student populations who rely heavily on school resources to prepare for college and life (McDonough, 2004 )
15 Scope of the Problem Starting and Completing High School A critical issue in secondary education is help ing students navigate efficiently during their tra nsition into high school. The sense of urgency about the freshman transition is merited, as the completion of the first year is one of the strongest predicto rs of high school graduation (Black, 2004; Hertzog & Morgan, 1999; Kennelly & Monrad, 2007 a ; Neild, Stoner Eby & Furstenburg, 2001; The Philadelphia Educational Longitudinal Study [PELS], 2006 ; Reyes, Gillock, Kobus & Sanchez, 2000). During t he ninth grad e year, students often struggle to adjust to the increased demands of adolescence, both within and out of school con texts (Crowder & South, 2003). Naturally occurring developmental issues may contribute to the failure of students to achieve academically a nd persist in high school (McCallumore & Sparapani, 2010 ; Roderick, 2003 ) The freshman transition process is further complicated for students that come from urban, high poverty settings and attend schools with limited resources (Cooper & Liou, 2007; Kenn elly & Monrad, 2007 b ) The freshman transition process is particularly critical for the disproportionate number of urban, African American males that fail to complete high school within the four years of their freshman cohorts ( Kennelly & Monrad, 2007 b; Noguera, 2003 ; Roderick, 2003 ). African American males are among the largest group of students who repeat grade nine (Jimerson, Pletcher, Graydon, Schnurr, Nickerson & Kunde rt, 2006; Rodney et al., 1999). African American males who enter high school unpr epared for the rigors and demands of the new setting tend to have poor attendance patterns; change schools frequently; experience difficulty with reading; engage in criminal activity; and are more likely to drop out of school (Bowman, 2005 ; Jimerson et al. 2006; Jimerson,
16 2001; National Association of School Psychologists [NASP], 2003) when compared to other racial/ethnic groups Consequently, students who repeat the ninth grade or drop out before completing this first year decrease their chances of ever completing high school and lessen their opportunities for upward mobility in society (Jimerson, 2001; Leckrone & Griffith, 2006; NASP, 2003; Rodney et al., 1999). Gaps in Education In addition to the developmental challenges of starting and finishing high school there are gap s in achievement, dropout rates and high school completion among student gender, race and income levels (Akos & Galassi, 2004; Clark, Lee, Goodman & Yacco, 2008; NASP, 2003; NCES, 2009; Riordan, 1998). Racial and gender gaps in the ra tes of high school graduation and drop out are evident in a review of the latest national and state level data on public schools (NCES, 2010; Schott, 2010). Overall, it is estimated that 74% (n = 2,965,286) of the U.S. student population graduated on tim e in the class of 2008 (NCES, 2010). In 2008, 81% (n = 1,853,476 ) of White stud ents compared to 61.5% (n = 415,111) of Black students graduated on time The Schott Foundation (2010) e stimates t hat in 2008, 47% (n = 1,974,000) of Black males, compared to 78% of White males report is that they do not include total enrollment for White students. An estimated 4.1% (n = 613,379) of all students dropped out in 2008 (NCES, 2010). Of the White students, 2.8% (n = 234,121) dropped out compared to 6.7% (n = 159,407) of Black students who dropped out of school. Males dropped out at a rate of 4.6% (n = 335,900) and females at a rate of 3.5% (n = 248,415). Florida data reveals similar trends in graduation and dropout occurrences. Overall, 66.9% (n = 149,046) of Florida public school students have graduated in 2008
17 (NCES, 2010). Slightly over 70% (n= 79,596) of White students, compared to 55.7% (30,239) of Black students graduated. It is estimated that 37% (n = 116,6 98) of Black males graduated in 2008, compared to 57% of White males (Schott, 2010). Approximately 3.3% (n = 26,635) of all Florida students dropped out of school in 2008 (NCES, 2010). Of all White students, 2.1% (n = 8,249) dropped out, compared to 4.7% (n = 8,710) of Black students. Males in Florida public schools dropped out at a rate of 3.5% (n = 13,824) and females at a rate of 2.7% (n = 10,217) in 2008. Role of the School Counselor Professional s chool counselors are trained to intervene on behalf of the academic, career and psychosocial needs of students us ing individual counseling, small group intervention, large group guidance, classroom guidance, advocacy, strategic assessment and collaboration (ASCA, 2005; Myrick, 2003). Furthermore, w hen workin g with diverse students and families that are situated in impoverished, urban settings, school counselors include confronting issues of access and equity to resources, and ensuring that students receive culturally appropriate responses to their need s (Amatea & W est Olatunji, 2007; Bemak & Chung 2005; Cooper & Liou, 2007; Ed Trust, 2009; Lee, 2001; White & Kelly, 2010). Although there is a need for more outcome research about the effects of school counseling on student achievement, findings have sh own that effective school counseling approaches may have positive influences on student outcomes (Lapan et al., 2003; Whiston & Quinby, 2009; Whiston & Sexton, 1998). S chool counselors can become leaders in the collaborative efforts that are needed to imp rove the educational outcomes of students who are at greatest risk of failure (Bryan & Holcomb McCoy, 2007; Clark & Breman, 2009; White & Kelly, 2010). E ffective school counseling
18 approaches in high needs, underperforming, urban schools may positively imp act the ways in which school s overcome the barriers to academic success for students who are most vulnerable (Lee, 2005; Bodenhorn, Wolfe & Airen, 2010). Theoretical Framework T h is study employ ed Albert Ba conceptualization of self efficacy theory was applied to the work of school counselors ( Bodenhorn & Skaggs, 2005 ). Also, self efficacy theory was used to conceptualize how school counselors assessed their efficacy to engage student s in school ( Tschannen Moran & Woolfolk Hoy, 2001 ). The self efficacy construct involves two types of expectancies, efficacy expectations (beliefs about whether relevant duties and tasks can be performed) and outcome expectancies (beliefs about the outco 1977, 1986; Dellinger et al., 2008; Sutton & Fall, 1995; Tschannen Moran & Woolfolk Hoy, 2001). Efficacy expectations are capabilities to perform specific tasks within specifie d domains. Outcome expectancies refer to the judgments that individuals hold about the results of their efforts. Thus, self outcomes of their performance within a specif ied context (Bandura, 19 77 ) Self efficacy beliefs mediate the extent to which individuals exert effort, persist in difficult situations, overcome barriers and persevere in order to be successful in particular tasks ( Baggerly & Osborn, 2006; Bandura, 1986; Pajares, 2002 ). Bandura (1995) further posits that self efficacy beliefs are developed when individuals are exposed to a history of successes (mastery experiences), observing behaviors (vicarious experiences), social or verbal persuasion and tensions (em otional reactions).
19 When engaging these sources of efficacy, individuals begin to develop stronger or weaker self efficacy beliefs with regards to specific tasks or domains. Self efficacy beliefs are an integral function of care er performance and satisfaction (Baggerly & Osborn, 2006). Thus, self efficacy theory is a good fit for examining how efficacious school counselors feel about their work and how it may relate to their helping students complete high school within the context of challeng ing school environments (Bandura, 1977). When considering the barriers and difficulties that are encountered at urban, underperforming high schools, a deeper investigation of efficacy address es how individu als exert efforts and persist when faced with challenges in the work place ( Bodenhorn & Skaggs, 2005 ; Sutton & Fall, 1995) Furthermore, t he use of self efficacy beliefs to examine how school counselors view their own performance and the outcomes of their work is useful when considering the impact that school counselor efficacy may have on student achievement (Bodenhorn et al., 2010) Statement of the Problem The freshman year of high school is a significant time of transition since students often e xperience many of the risk factors that are associated with dropping out (NASP, 2003; National Dropout Prevention Center [NDPC], 2007; PELS, 2006). F actors such as gender, race, socioeconomic status, repeating a grade or parental education, w hen considere d individually, do not accurately predict which students will drop out of school (NDPC, 2007) Rather, a combination of risk factors predicts more accurately which students are likely to drop out of school (Farmer, et al., 2004; NASP, 2003; NDPC, 2007; Su h & Suh, 2007).
20 Urban, poor, minority youth that are held back a grade are more likely to have unequal access to resources and are most adversely impacted by such retention practices (Darling Hammond, 1998). The risk factor of repeating a grade becomes more indicative of who will drop out since 70 80% of students who repeat the freshman year will not complete high school (Black, 2004; NASP, 2003). Furthermore, characteristics among students that are more likely to repeat a grade and be at highest risk to drop out are those who are male, African American or Hispanic, live in low income or single parent households and change schools frequently (NDPC, 2007; Neild Stoner Eby & Furstenberg, 2001). Urban, underperforming high schools experience significant disp arities between the achievement of females and males ( Balfanz & Legters, 2004; NCES, 2010; Riordan, 1998 ). This gender gap in achievement is well documented for African American adolescent males and females who come from impoverished communities (Catteral l, 1998; Dynarski & Gleason, 2002; NDPC, 2007; Schott, 2009). The groups of males that drop out often report a sense of disconnection or detachment from peers and adults within the school community and a history of academic failure (NDPC, 2007). Consequ ently, if underrepresented youth do not persist in high school, they are likely to experience the most adverse societal outcomes (NASP, 2003). The NASP found that adults who dropped out of high school were more likely to have lower impoverished communities have layers of obstacles to overcome if they do not complete high school successfully.
21 Need f or the Study Schools that are situated in urban, impoverished communities present the school counselor with opportunities to address the distinct chall enges that urban youth encounter in their secondary schooling experiences ( Amatea & West Olatunji, 2007; Bodenhorn et al., 2010) Hence, this study contributed to research about the possible males at urban, predominantly African American high schools. It is well establishe d that teacher self efficacy has a significant impact on student outcomes (Ashton & Webb, 1986; Goddard, 2001; Goddard, Hoy & Hoy, 2000; Tschannen Moran a nd Barr, 2004) W hile there is an expectation that school counselors link the results of their practi ce to student outcomes, little attention has been devoted to learning about the relationship between school counselor self efficacy beliefs about their general practice and student achievement (ASCA, 2005; Bodenhorn et al., 2010). Evidence to support the link between school counselor self efficacy and student outcomes is unavailable. Given the potential negative outcomes for African American males who do not complete high school, more attention needs to be directed to the impact that school counselors have on the graduation rates in high schools (Cooper & Liou, 2007). E arly indications suggest that effective school counseling interventions positively impact student outcomes ( Bemak et al., 2005; Lapan et al., 2003; Whiston & Quinby, 2009) Research about t eacher efficacy holds promise for similar studies about the relationship between school counselor self efficacy about their work and student outcomes (Bodenhorn et al. 2010).
22 re at an equivalent status of teachers (ASCA, 2010) However, there is little educational efficacy affect student outcomes. The gap between practice and research is reflected by the existence of only three self efficacy instruments developed for school counseling practice in more than thirty years of self efficacy research ( Bandura, 1977; Bodenhorn & Skaggs, 2005; Holcomb McCoy Harris, Hines & Johnston, 2008; Sutton & Fall, 1995). If very little is known about the effects of school counselor self efficacy for the general population of students in public education, then it is likely that there is a greater mystery about how the work of school counselors can impact the rates of high school completion for males at urban, underperforming, predominantly African American schools. Furthermore, greater investments are graduation r ates because of the potential adverse outcomes for the se students and for society (NASP, 2003; NCES, 2009 ; NDPC, 2007). Purpose of the Study efficacy within the context of urban schools. Also explored in this study was the role of urban school counselors in the rates of high school completion for African American male students. T he purpose of the study was to examine if a relationship exists between school counselor self efficacy and the rate of high school completion for African American males in urban, underperforming schools. In order to examine this relationship, the following questions about urban, predominantly African American underperforming high schools were addressed.
23 Research Questions RQ 1a : What is the association between school counselor self efficacy beliefs about work and the counselor level characteristics of gender, number of years of teaching, number of years of counseling, and training in ASCA National Standards? RQ 1b : What is the association between school counselor self efficacy beliefs about work and the school level characteristics of 2009 total student enrollment, Black student enrollment, enrollment students in the free reduced lunch program, and the 2009 graduation rates fo r males? RQ 2a : What is the association between school counselor sense of efficacy to engage African American male students and the counselor level characteristics of gender, number of years of teaching, number of years of counseling, and training in ASCA National Standards? RQ 2b : What is the association between school counselor sense of efficacy to engage African American male students and the school level characteristics of 2009 total student enrollment, Black student enrollment, enrollment students in the free reduced lunch program, and the 2009 graduation rates for males? RQ 3 : What is the relationship between school counselor self efficacy beliefs about work and the 2009 graduation rates for males at their schools? RQ 4 : What is the relationship betwee n school counselor sense of efficacy to engage African American male students and the 2009 graduation rates for males at their schools? RQ 5a : What is the relationship between school counselor self efficacy beliefs about work and 2009 graduation rates for males and partnership affiliation? RQ5b : What is the relationship between school counselor sense of efficacy to engage African American male students and 2009 graduation rates for males and partnership affiliation? Hypotheses Ho1a : There is no associati on between school counselor self efficacy beliefs about work and the counselor level characteristics of gender, number of years of teaching, number of years of counseling, and training in ASCA National Standards. Ho1b : There is no association between sch ool counselor self efficacy beliefs about work and the school level characteristics of 2009 total student enrollment, Black student enrollment, enrollment students in the free reduced lunch program, and the 2009 graduation rates for males.
24 Ho2a : There is no association between school counselor sense of efficacy to engage African American male students and the counselor level characteristics of gender, number of years of teaching, number of years of counseling, and training in ASCA National Standards. Ho 2b : There is no association between school counselor sense of efficacy to engage African American male students and the school level characteristics of 2009 total student enrollment, Black student enrollment, enrollment students in the free reduced lunch program, and the 2009 graduation rates for males. Ho3 : There is no relationship between school counselor self efficacy beliefs about work and the 2009 graduation rates for males. Ho4 : There is no relationship between school counselor sense of efficacy t o engage African American male students and the 2009 graduation rates for males. Ho5a : There is no relationship between school counselor self efficacy beliefs about work and 2009 graduation rates for males and partnership affiliation. Ho 5b : There is no rel ationship between school counselor sense of efficacy to engage African American male students and 2009 graduation rates for males and partnership affiliation. Definition of Terms Achievement Gap refers to the documented disparit ies in school performance and testing outcomes among gender, racial/ethnic and socioeconomic groups in educational attainment African American is used interchangeably with Black /Non Hispanic (FLDOE) and refers to individuals that have origins in any of the nations of Africa, the C aribbean, and includ es people wh o self report their race as Black ( US Census 2000 ) ASCA National Model is the for comprehensive, data driven school counseling delivery. The ASCA National Model addresses management, and accountability (ASCA, 2005) The framework is built upon the ASCA
25 National Standards and the themes of leadership, advocacy, collaboration, and systematic change (Herr & Er ford, 2011). ASCA National Standards or The National Standards for School Counseling Programs are the standardized competencies for comprehensive, developmental school counseling programs. The three categories of standards are academic, career, and person al/social development (Herr & Erford, 2011). College Access refers to the process of pursuing education beyond high school with adequate financial and human resources to enter and graduate successfully from a postsecondary institution (NCAN, 2010). Dropout is the culminating act and the process that to exit high school before earning high school credentials (NDPC, 2007). Efficacy expectations beliefs about whether duties and tasks can be performed (Bandura, 1977). F reshman Transition is a process that students experience when changing fro m middle school to high school. F or the purposes of this study, the freshman transition period spans from the start of and successful completion of grade nine. High performing high poverty more than fifty percent of students from low income households (as determined by eligibility for free or reduced lunch) and demonstrate high levels of student achievement. High school graduation is the act of a student earning a high school diploma or equivalent credentials within four years of entry into the ninth grade. This term is used interchangeably with high school
26 Outcome expectancy refer s to the judgments that individuals h old about the results of their performance within a specific context (Bandura, 1986). Professional School Counselor is used interchangeably with school counselor and refers to a s degree in school co unseling. School counselors development needs by designing, implementing, evaluating and enhancing a comprehensive school counseling program that promotes and enhances student success (ASCA, 2009) Sc hool counselor self efficacy refer s to their professional competence (Bodenhorn & Skaggs, 2005) and their outcome expectancy related to engaging students (Tschannen Moran & Woolfolk Hoy, 2001). The five domains of s chool counselor self efficacy beliefs about their work ( Personal and Social Development, Leadership and Assessment, Career and Academic Development, Collaboration and Consultation, and Cultural Acceptance ) are recognized as requisite competencies for profe ssional school counselors and derived from the ASCA National Standards (Bodenhorn & Skaggs, 2005). S elf efficacy is specific tasks within specified domains and their beliefs about the outc omes of the ir performance (Bandura, 19 77 ) Stakeholder refers to students, families (parents, caregivers), teachers, administrators, community members, school board staff, and any individual or entity that is invested in student achievement and success.
27 U nderperforming refers to schools that perform below expected levels based on Florida state indicators due to complex risk factors such as poverty and limited Ur ban is defined as the classification of cities that experience at least 1000 people per square miles (US Census, 2000). For the purposes of this study, schools that are situated within urban cities and have an average of 1,000 or more student enrollment w ill be considered urban schools. Summary U rban, African American ma les who come from low income backgrounds are apt to encounter challenges that are unique to their personal, social and economic classifications as they matriculate through public high schoo ls. Thus, t he crisis that ensues when these youth fail to complete high school has implications for their e ducational, personal and societal outcomes. Professional school counselors are key stakeholders in the success of marginalized youth, as they can s erve as leaders and advocates in efforts to narrow the achievement gap in challenging school environments. However, educational research lags behind in discovering how school counselor self efficacy may influence student outcomes. This study adds to the research about the role of school counselor self efficacy in student achievement. Chapter Two presents the review of related literature in social cognitive theory and the conceptualization of self efficacy within professional school counseling. Also inclu ded is a delineation of the issues related to high school completion for African American males and the challenges of accessing resources for college. Chapter Two
28 concludes with an analysis of the previous research findings related to this current study a nd the implications for professional school counseling.
29 CHAPTER 2 LITERATURE REVIEW The purpose of this s tudy wa s to examine if a relationship exists between school counselor self efficacy beliefs and the rate of graduation for males at urban, underperfor ming high schools. Chapter Two begins with a discussion of social cognitive theory and a review of related literature about self efficacy in teaching and professional school counseling. The chapter continues with a discussion about the issues related to high school completion for African American males, the implications for college access for this population, and concludes with the role of p rofessional school counselors in narrowing the achievement gap Social Cognitive Theory Social cognitive theory (SCT learning theory. Bandura challenged the popular stance, and his own theoretical perspective, in social learning theory that placed more weight on the influence of environmental and biological factors on behavior (Pajares, 2002). Instead, social cognitive theory was offered as a view of human functioning and learning in which self beliefs have a central role in how people adapt and change. ncy and the ability of people to exercise control over their thoughts and actions. An understanding conceptualization of collective agency. This was later extended t o collective efficacy, where shared beliefs are held to influence how groups work together to bring about organizational change (Bandura, 1995; Pajares, 2002).
30 Another tenet of SCT is the ability of individuals to learn vicariously and the subsequent adjus tments of thoughts and attitudes that are made from observational learning (Pajares, 2002). Behaviors are developed from a process of observing, change. Bandura (1986) assert reflect is the strongest mediator of behavioral change and is what distinguishes people as humans. According to SCT, behavior is a function of the close interaction of external stimulus, external reinforcement and cognitive meditational processes (Corsini & Wedding, 2000). Cognition has a central role in behavior and influences such processes as self reflection, self organization, and self regulation (Bandura, 1977). Beliefs that people hold about their capabilities are kn own as self efficacy beliefs directed change (Corsini & Wedding, 2000). Self efficacy beliefs mediate how individuals perform when equipped with requisite skills and knowl edge (Bandura, 1995). Thus, self actual capabilities (Pajares, 2002). Self Efficacy T Moran & Hoy, 2001 p.792) in defining self e fficacy and challenges in subsequent development of adequate meas ures of the construct (Dellinger et al., 2008) Bandura (1977, 1986) made a distinction between efficacy expectations and outcome expectancy both constituting the construct of general self efficacy competence to perform duties and task in specific contexts. Outcome expectancies are
31 specified contexts (Su tton & Fall, 1995). See Figure 2 1. Figure 2 efficacy Many instruments purport to measure self efficacy. However, these instruments have failed to capture both efficacy expectations and outcome expectancy as defined by Bandura (Delinger et al., 2008; Tschannen Moran & Hoy, 2001 ). Furthermore, attempts to measure self efficacy present challenges when trying to determine the level of specificity for the contexts and domains of self efficacy ( Tschannen Moran & Hoy, 2001 ). Bandura (1977, 1986, 1993, 1995) advanced an understanding of the role of self efficacy in behavior. S elf efficacy beliefs are task or domain specific judgments that individuals hol d about their capabilities and the outcomes of their perfo rmance (Bandura, 1986) Such beliefs are among the strongest influences of a course of action that is taken for a given task or domain (Bandura, 1977). Self efficacy is developed when individuals a) acquire the requisite skills for a task (mastery), b) o bserve others engage successfully in similar tasks (vicarious experiences), c) receive social or verbal persuasion that they will be successful in a given task, and d) have emotional reactions
32 (tensions) related to a task (Bandura, 1986, 1995). Hence, s el f efficacy beliefs mediate task related functions such as performance, the amount of effort that is exerted in the face of challenges, goal setting, and a personal sense of competence (Bandura, 1977; Pajares, 2002). Empirical evidence supports the role tha t self efficacy has in the schooling process and its relat ionship to : student mathematics performance (Pajares & Miller, 1994 ; Schunk, 1989); reading and writing tasks (Pajares & Valiante, 1997; Shell, Murphy & Bruning, 1989); interest in specific school s ubj ect areas (Long et al. 2007); sense of belonging (Walker & Greene, 2009); general high school engagement (Caraway et al., 2003) ; and teaching and teacher education ( Ashton & Webb, 1986; Goddard, Hoy & Hoy 2000; Pajares, 1996; Tschannen Moran, Woolfolk Hoy & Hoy, 1998) Also, self efficacy is linked to counseling related outcomes such as: career decision making ( Krumboltz, 1979); career satisfaction and commitment (Baggerly & Osborn, 2006); school counselor multicultural competence (Holcomb McCoy et al ., 2008); and general school counseling practice (Bodenhorn & Skaggs, 2005; Bodenhor n et al., 20 10; Sutton & Fall, 1995). Teacher Efficacy Efficacy within the context of teaching is conceptualized in many ways. Teacher efficacy, teacher self efficacy an efficacy are among the common labels that have been used to describe the beliefs that teachers hold about their professional competence, ability to engage students in learning, expectations, and the outcomes of their efforts withi n the context of their work environment (Ashton, 1984; Bandura, 1977; Tschannen Moran & Woolfolk Hoy 2001). The relationship of teacher efficacy and self efficacy to educational outcomes has been demonstrated widely in
33 teaching and teacher education rese arch ( Ashton & Webb, 1986; Goddard, Hoy & Hoy 2000; Pajares, 1996; Tschannen Moran, Woolfolk Hoy & Hoy, 1998) Ashton and Webb (1986) conducted a multiphase study that furthered an understanding of the role of teacher self efficacy on student achievement. As part of the overall project, two ethnographic studies were conducted with middle and high defined roles and attitudes. A key finding was the reported differences of beliefs about low achieving students th at were held by high self efficacy and low self efficacy teachers (Ashton & Webb, 1986). Teachers with high self efficacy were more likely than low self efficacious teachers to believe that low eacher attention and efficacy fostered more adverse classroom climates than their high self As m entioned previously, there has been confusion about defining and measuring adequately teacher self efficacy (Bandura, 1977; Dellinger et al., 2008). In an effort to clarify the meaning of teacher self efficacy and provide an instrument that aligns more wi Moran and Woolfolk Hoy (2001) developed the (TSES) The TSES measures student engagement, instructional strategies, and classroom management. Previous studies reported reliabilities for the entire measure that ranged from .92 to .95, and subscale reliabilities that ranged from .86 to .90 (Tschannen Moran & Woolfolk Hoy 2007).
34 Coll ective teacher efficacy (CTE) is distinct from teacher self efficacy (Bandura, perception that teachers in a given school Moran & Barr, 2004, p. 190 on collective teacher efficacy (CTE) has implications for exploring the impact of school McCoach & Colbert, 2010; Tschannen Moran & Barr, 2004). Goodard and his colleagues (2000) developed the Collective Teacher Efficacy Scale (CTES) as a measure of how overall school units perceive their contributions to student achievement. Factor analysis of the CTES provided evidence of the integral efficacy: task and competence (McCoach & Colbert, 2010). In other words, the CTES was proven reliable to measure to what degree teachers, as a collective unit, b elieved they are able (competent) to impact student achievement (task). Tschannen Moran and Barr (2004) found significant positive relationships between collective teacher efficacy and tests of student achievement. However, Bandura (1993) asserts that co llective teacher efficacy declines in the later grades, where increased academic demands may adversely impact School Counselor Self Efficacy School counselor self efficacy is a recent construct development within self effi cacy research. The construct is an application of teacher self efficacy within the context of school counselor roles (Bandura, 1977; Bodenhorn & Skaggs, 2005; Sutton & Fall, 1995). Thus, school counselor self efficacy beliefs can be viewed as the counsel related
35 duties and task within specific context of school counseling and guidance (Bandura, 1986; Bodenhorn & Skaggs, 2005). Sutton and Fall (1995) set precedent by adapting a previously d eveloped teacher self efficacy scale to create the Counselor Self Efficacy Scale (CSS). The CSS was designed to determine the relationship of school counselor self efficacy to various demographic variables, school counselor roles and school climate. Scho ol climate, specifically perceived support from colleagues and administrators, was found to be the strongest influence on school counselor self efficacy (Sutton & Fall, 1995). In a correlation analysis of 1,280 school counselors survey responses Baggerly and Osborn (2006) found that self efficacy relates positively to school counselor s career satisfaction and commitment. School counselors who reported high self efficacy for inappropriate duties, as defined by the ASCA National Model (2005), had higher c areer satisfaction and commitment than counselors who reported low self efficacy for inappropriate duties. School counselors with high self efficacy were more likely than those with low self efficacy to persist in challenging situations to accomplish a ta sk (Bandura, 1977; Sutton & Fall, 1995). As discussed previously, self efficacy beliefs mediate the extent to which individuals exert effort, persist in difficult situations, overcome barriers and persevere to be successful in particular tasks (Bandura, 1 977, 1995). efficacy. The School Counselor Multicultural Self Efficacy Scale (SCMES) measures the McCoy et al., 2008). The items of the SCMES were
36 developed through a review of research, relevant literature and self efficacy scale development guidelines. The SCMES fills a gap in previous self efficacy research (Bandura, 1977; Bodenhorn & Skaggs, 2005; Sutton & Fall, 1995) because it addresses multicultural issues in school counseling. Holcomb McCoy and her colleagues reported that the number of multicultu ral courses taken and ethnicity were significantly related to school counselor multicultural self efficacy. Although multicultural competence is a part counselor multicultur al self efficacy is distinct from, and has no significant relationship to, general school counselor self efficacy (Holcomb McCoy et al., 2008). Building upon the works of Bandura (1986, 1995) and Sutton and Fall (1995), Bodenhorn and Skaggs (2005) further developed an understanding of self efficacy within the context of professional school counseling. The construct of school counselor self school counseling tasks (Bodenhorn & S kaggs, 2005; Bodenhorn et al., 2010). The items of the associated instrument, School Counselor Self Efficacy Scale (SCSE), were developed using the ASCA National S tandards for practice across all grade levels The five domains of school counselor self ef ficacy derive from the recommended duties of school counselors: Personal and Social Development, Leadership and Assessment, Career and Academic Development, Collaboration, and Cultural Acceptance (ASCA, 2005). The four variables that Bodenhorn and Skaggs found that relate positively to self efficacy are: (a) gender (females compared to males), (b) teaching experience, (c) three or more years of school counseling practice, and (d) training in the ASCA National Standards.
37 Another significant finding is that school counselors with high self efficacy about their general practice are more likely than their low self efficacy counterparts to have awareness and acknowledgement of the achievement gap and equity issues within their schools (Bodenhorn et al., 2010). School counselors who reported higher levels of self efficacy and used a systematic approach to school counseling in their practice perceived a narrowing of the achievement gap at their schools. The seminal research about school counselor self efficacy has implications for the role of school counselors and their administrators in narrowing the achievement gap. Early research suggests that school administrators can affect school counselor self efficacy by fostering positive school climates and demonstrating support for the work of the school counselor (Sutton & Fall, 1995). Higher school counselor self efficacy can lead to proactive school counselors that persist in situations where they are asked to perform non school counseling related duties (Baggerly & Osborn, 2006). Furthermore, school counselors with high self efficacy may be more conscious of achievement gap and equity issues within their schools and, subsequently, be responsive and active in helping to narrow the achievement gap within their school s (Bodenhorn et al., 2010; Holcomb McCoy et al., 2008). Variables such as implementation of school counseling programs, quality of school counseling preparation, training in the ASCA National Standards (Bodenhorn & Skaggs, 2005), and school climate (Sutto and may have a positive influence on student outcomes (Bodenhorn et al., 2010). efficacy about their work (efficacy expectations) and engaging students in lear ning at their school (outcome expectancy),
38 this study used the conceptualizations of Bodenhorn and Skaggs (2005) and Tschannen Moran and Woolfolk Hoy (2001). Distinctions were made among school counselor self efficacy, school counselor self efficacy belie fs, and having a sense of efficacy about the efforts that are made on behalf of students. Hence, both strands of efficacy, efficacy expectations and outcome expectancy, were incorporated into the definition of sch ool counselor self efficacy in this study. See Figure 2 2. Figure 2 2. School counselor self efficacy T he remainder of this chapter presents a discussion of the achievement and gender gap in education and the role that school counselors have in narrowin g the achievement gap.
39 Challenges and Implications of High School Completion Significance of the Freshman Year The start of high school can be a positive experience for adolescents with the promise of increased opportunities and interpersonal growth. How ever, t he freshman year proves to be a turbulent time for students and predictive of high school success and graduation for most students (McCallumore & Sparapani, 2010 ; Roderick, 2003 ). As students begin high school, absenteeism, poor study skills, time management, organization, increased academic rigor and student self efficacy development present numerous challenge s related to the successful completion of high school (Neild et al., 2001; PELS, 2006; Reyes et al., 2000; Smith, Akos, Lim & Wiley, 2008). D uring the ninth grade year, schools experience the highest enrollment of students as a result of the disproportionate number of students that are held back in grade nine (Wheelock & Miao, 2005). The academic failure rate increases significantl y during the first year and was, at one point, found to be three to five times higher than in other grades (Southern Regional Educational Board [SREB], 2002). An estimated 40% of freshmen in cities with the highest dropout rates repeat grade nine (Kennelly & Monrad, 2007 b ). School attendance is typically poorest among 9 th graders: 78% of grade nine students attend classes regularly compared to 92.5% in 1 st grade, 86.3% in 8 th grade and 80.9% in 12 th grade ( Black 2004 ; Neild et al., 2001 ). Consequently, adolescents who are not successful during the ninth grade year are at greatest risk of not completing high school (AEE, 2009; Black, 2004; NASP, 2003). In addition to the personal and developmental variables related to transitioning (Roderick, 2003) socioeconomic, ge nder and race specific factors may intensify the transition experiences of minority youth as they start high school (Akos & Galassi, 2004;
40 Holcomb McCoy, 2007). The poorest outcomes and highest rates of dropout that follow ninth grade repetition occur in larger, urban settings (Balfanz & Legters, 2004; Kennelly & Monrad, 2007 a ). This is especially the case for ethnically diverse males that come from impoverished backgrounds and are more likely to be found in many low resource, urban centers (Balfanz & Leg ters, 2004; NCES, 2010). Unfortunately, the minority males who do not transition into high school successfully have an increased chance of dropping out of school (Roderick, 2003), thereby limit ing their postsecondary opportunities after high school ( AEE, 2009) Risk Factors for Dropping Out Drop ping out, as conceptualized in this study, is not an isolated and individualized phenomenon. Rather, factors that are related to individual, family, school and community domains interact with each other to contribu the school system before earning their high school diploma (NDPC, 2007; Suh & Suh, 2007). Hence, t here are many risk factors associated with the culminating act of dropping out of school (Murdock, 1999; NDPC, 2007; PELS, 2006; Reyes et al, 2000). The National Dropout Prevention Center (2007) summarized twenty five years of dropout research to identify risk factors and exemplary programs that have demonstrated success with dropout prevention. Dropout factors emerged wit hin four major categories: individual, family, school and community factors (Suh & Suh, 2007). Some indicators that increase the chances of dropping out of school include high number of absences, poor school behavior, being over age for grade (retention), low academic achievement, low socioeconomic status, and having a sibling that has dropped out of school (NDPC, 2007; Neild et al., 2001)
41 Exemplary programs, as classified by NDPC, were successful in decreasing the rates of dropout because they employed than one domain of risk factors (NDPC, 2007). Hence, a multiple strategy approach to dropout prevention has implications for the use of the collaborative and systemic approaches that may be required to improv e the rate of high school completion. Dropout risk factors and indicators have also been identified as early as the middle school years (Murdock, 1999; PELS, 2006). In a longitudinal study that began in 1996 by the Philadelphia Education Fund and John Hop kins University (PELS, 2006), as the sixth grade. ed drop out among middle school students living in urban, high poverty neighborhoods: poor school attendance, poor history of behavior, failing math assessment, and literacy assessments (Balfanz & Herzog, 2006). The PELS researchers recommended that educators and administrators use pre ventive measures for all students and reorganize school resources to meet the distinct needs of students during the early transitional process. In general, students that demonstrate a low commitment to school, engagement with high risk peer groups and low educational expectations have an increased likelihood of dropping out of high school (NDPC, 2007). More indicators for students that are at risk for dropping out include an early disengagement with school, failure to keep pace at high school, poor relatio education, and a sense of alienation with the school community (Caraway, Tucker, Reinke & Hall, 2003; Murdock, 1999). Among the many indicators that are associated
42 with dropping out, having poor grades, low so cioeconomic status and behavioral problems are believed to be among the strongest factors that impact dropout rates (Reyes et al., 2000; Suh & Suh, 2007). Consequences of Dropping Out Students who do not complete the freshman transition successfully are mo re likely to experience negative outcomes such as drug and alcohol use, depression, juvenile crime and ultimately drop out before earning their high school diploma (NDPC, 2007). Some of the societal and economics consequences of dropping out include: earn ing about $260,000 less over a lifetime than a high school graduate (Rouse, 2005); $319 billion in lost wages for the US economy by dropouts in the class of 2008; and about $17 billion in cost for uninsured individuals who dropped out of high school in the class of 2006 (AEE, 2009). Students who drop out of school have few er job opportunities and are more likely to depend on government subsidized assistance than their graduating counterparts (Dynarski & Gleason, 2002). The latest report of educational atta inment of the US correctional population estimates that 41.3% of the incarcerated population, compared to 18.4% of the general population, did not complete high school (Harlow, 2003). High school dropouts are estimated to be at least eight times more like ly to be incarcerated than high school completers (Bridgeland et al., 2006). In addition to having fewer job opportunities and lower lifetime earnings, African American males that do not graduate from high school are more likely to engage in criminal acti vity and spend time in jail or prison than Hispanic or White males (Dynarski & Gleason, 2002; NASP, 2003).
43 Achievement Gaps at Urban Schools National Data The outcomes of dropout and grade retention are more adverse for minority males that live in economi cally impoverished urban centers with limited resources (NCES, 2009). Although there are discrepancies between state and national calculations of high school graduation and dropout rates, gaps persist between genders and within race/ethnicities in the rat es of students that are held back at least one grade (FLDOE, 2009; NASP, 2003; NCES, 2006, 2010). The retention estimates that 30% to 50% of students will have repeated a grade by the t ime they enter the ninth grade. girls. Black students, at 16%, are twice more likely than White students to be retained (NCES, 2006) It is furt her estimated that at the secondary education level, 21% of students that drop out have been retained at least on c e compared to only 12% of students who do not drop out (NCES, 2006). In regard to persistence in high school, fewer than 75% of students in A merican 2004; NCES, 2010 ). Compared to the national estimated dropout rate of 8.7% for all students in 2007, males dropped out a rate of 9.8%, compared to the 7.7% of females that dropped in 2007. Whites comprised 5.3% and African Americans 8.4% of those who did not persist in high school. While 90.6% of females are reported to have graduated in 2007, only 87.4% of males in the same report completed high school (N CES, 2009). African Americans completed high school at a rate of 88.8% compared to Whites that completed at a rate
44 of 93.5% (NCES, 2009). Among the US high school completers estimated in 2007, 94.6% of the White females and 92.4% of White males completed school, compared to 88.7% of Black females and 89.0% of Black males (NCES, 2009). Although there was a slight increase of Black males that graduated, compared to Black females in 2007, Black females historically complete high school at a higher rate than Black males (NASP, 2003; NCES, 2009). State Data T he state of Florida experiences wider gender and racial/ethnic gaps in high school graduation rates when compared nationally. The estimates that Florida report for NCLB accountability requirements exclud e students who receive special diplomas because of certain disabilities, standard high school certificates, special high school certificates, and adult education (GED) diplomas (Florida Department of Education [FLDOE], 2010). Florida reported that 167,644 students enrolled in the 12 th grade for the 2008 school year. It is estimated that 72.8% (n = 122,044) of these students graduated with standard high school diplomas. White students graduated at a rate of 81.4%, compared to 58.7% of Black students. Fem ales graduated at a rate of 76.8%, compared to 68.7 % of males African Americans graduated at a rate of 58.7%, compared to White students at 81.4 % The lower rates of graduation in Florida remain even when gaps are accounted for among several calculations and reporting sources as cited in Alliance for Excellent Education [AEE] (2009). The AEE (2009) cited three independent sources of Florida graduation in 2007 as 68% (State Reported No Child Left Behind), 64% (United States Department of Education) and 58 % (Education Week). Moreover, schools that yielded the worst rates of high school completion in Florida, as found in other parts of the United
45 States, are usually in urban areas, experience higher rates of poverty, and enroll predominantly minority popula tions (Balfanz & Legters, 2004; FLDOE, 2010; NCES, 2010). Barriers to African American Male Achievement In a longitudinal study of high school students in a metropolitan urban context, Roderick (2003) explores why African American males in urban settings tend to have more problems during their transition into high school. Roderick offers possible explanations that may account for the challenges that African American males rnal supports and skills, disproportionate effects of school environments, and coping achievement (p.543). When compared to males of other ethnic groups, African American males that live in urban, high poverty communities are more likely to enter high schools with the least prerequisite skills (Roderick, 2003) Also, this group of young males is least likely to have the external supports that are required for the increased dema nds of the new high African American males from impoverished communities are among the most underperforming groups academically as they enter high school (NASP, 2003; N CES, 2006) Schooling Practices Aspects of the high school environment place African American males at a greater risk of academic failure. Common high school practices such as tracking (grouping students by ability without later assessment to advance ac ademically), increased
46 reliance on punitive discipline, the increased use of suspensions and similar negative behavioral reinforcements disproportionately marginalize and alienate African American males in large, urban settings ( Roderick, 2003; Rodney et a l., 1999 ) African American males are among the highest number of students that are suspended and retained, in proportion to their total enrollment in schools (Jimerson et al, 2006; NASP, 2003; NCES, 2006). African American males are also the least likel y, compared to other groups of ethnic males, to be enrolled or recommended for honors, Advanced Placement (AP) or rigorous course selections that would better prepare them for college (Ohrt, Lambie & Ieva, 2009) Furthermore, the challenges that African A merican males encounter in the new school setting is compounded by their concentrated enrollment in schools that may not have equal access to higher quality curriculum (Balfanz & Legters, 2004; Darling Hammond & Friedlaender, 2008; NCES, 2010). An explanat ion is offered that relates to the effects of previous negative experiences with schools. Th e males that enter high school, already unprepared for the rigors and demands of the new environment, will tend to have poorer attendance patterns; change schools more frequently; experience more difficulty with reading; and are more likely to drop out of school (Jimerson, 20 01; Jimerson et al., 2006; NASP, 2003). Given the prior negative experiences that have been documented and reported by African American males throughout their schooling, Roderick (2003) asserts that they may enter high school without the adequate coping resources that are required to persist in the face of increased challenges at the high school level. Beliefs about Accountability Another barrie r to minority male achievement may be the beliefs that are held by stakeholders about accountability for student outcomes and responsibility for the
47 persistence of the achievement gap among African American adolescents (Davis & Jordan, 1994; Lynn et al., 2 010). Davis and Jordan (1994) found that high school teachers who reported lower levels of perceived accountability for student outcomes correlated significantly with lower student performance for Black males. Similarly, Lynn and his colleagues (2010) fo und that a majority of educators that were sampled at a predominantly African American, low performing high school did not perceive themselves as responsible for the academic success of students. Rather, they blamed the minority achievement gap on student s, families and their communities. In contrast, a small group of teachers at the same school who demonstrated more success with the male students assumed responsibility for student outcomes and attributed multiple factors to the achievement gap between ma les and females at the school. The psychosocial characteristics of those who educate African American male students may have implications for the outcomes of this group of students (Davis & Jordan, 1994; Lynn et al., 2010). The findings of Davis and Jor dan (1994) and Lynn et al. (2010) suggest that psychosocial factors such as beliefs, perceived accountability for outcomes, and expectations of success and failure are one of the keys to improving the outcomes of African American males in urban contexts. T heir findings about the possible impact of perceived accountability for student outcomes support the need for more evidence based research about how the beliefs and attitudes of educators impact the achievement gap. Success Factors for Males at Urban Schoo ls Research about the educational status and outlook of African American adolescent males often is presented in terms of their failure compared to other racial and gender groups. Understandably, the educational data is overwhelming relative to
48 the number schools. The reliance of such data, albeit useful for developing interventions for reform and improvement, belies the resilience and efforts that the higher achieving subgroup of African A merican males make to persist in the face of exceptional odds against them within the public education system (Schott, 2010) In this subsection, research is reviewed that reaches beyond the common stories of failure about African American males and the s takeholders that serve them and highlights some correlates of academic success for such students. Some of the individual correlates that influence the academic achievement of African American youth include attitude, student effort, behavior, association w ith peers (Nebbitt et al., 2009; Stewart, 2007), and future orientation (Adelabu, 2007). However, there is a high variance of individual characteristics that may account for achievement. Thus, there tends to be more consistent findings about the school r elated factors that influence the educational outcomes of urban males (McCallumore & Sparapani, 2010; Neild et al., 2001; Noguera, 2003; Reyes et al., 2001) High performing high poverty (HP2) schools are exemplars for their demonstrable success at the s chool level in educating culturally diverse students that come from impoverished backgrounds (The Center for Public Education [CPE], 2006 ; McGee, overcome the barriers to learning through the use of stakeholder resources and best practices ( CPE, 2006; Kannapel & Clements, 2005). The telling outcomes of HP2
49 rds and that of their high income counterparts to experience school wide success. A series of independent investigations of HP2 schools in several states yielded common practices and beliefs that may account for their success (CPE, 2006; Barth, et al, 19 99; Kannapel & Clements, 2005). Some of the themes that emerged from the studies of HP2 schools have implications for this study. Theme analysis from the study of HP2 schools reveal that stakeholders tend to share the belief that all youth can learn; dif ferentiated instruction and ongoing assessment took place within the school and classroom; a strong, consistent and collaborative leadership included teachers in the decision making process; and intentional family involvement were instrumental to school wi de success (CPE, 2006; Ed Trust, 2009; Kannapel & Clements, 2005). In The New York City High Schools Contributing the Most to the Achievement of Black and Latino Males a technical report by Metropolitan Center for Urban Education [MCUE] (2009), research ers reported findings from a survey of 213 urban high schools to determine common characteristics of schools that were successful in graduating high numbers of Black and Latino males. The schools that demonstrated the most success had four characteristics in common, as measured by the number of Black and Latino males that graduated on time: a) high attendance rates, b) high ratings of school climate and academic expectations, c) low percentages of English language learning (ELL) students, and d) a large nu mber of students that entered high school with proficiency in grade eight math (MCUE, 2009). Among the four factors that were common to the highest rated schools, two have implications for the current study: successful schools
50 had high attendance rates an d higher reports of positive school climate and high academic expectations (MCUE, 2009). academic achievement. Schools that placed a heavy emphasis on academic achievement as part of their school climate tended to demonstrate higher student achievement (Hoy, Tarter & Bliss, 1990; Lee & Shute, 2010). Furthermore, schools may experience better rates of attendance if students were engaged and invested in their own learning (Stewart, 2007). Although the findings of MCUE have implications for the schools and population in question, a major limitation relates to the type of schools that were examined. The characteristics that emerged for schools that were highly successful in graduating Black males were mostly of schools that implemented a screening or audition requirement for enrollment. Therefore, it is with caution that the findings are generalized to African American males that have minimal options for schooling outside of high pove rty schools without selective admissions policies. In summary, it is critical that schools foster a sense of shared responsibility for learning for urban youth (Davis & Jordan, 1994). Other key correlates for urban youth include facilitating positive scho ol climates and holding high expectations and beliefs in the educability of all students (MCUE, 2009; Stewart, 2007). Such schools attest to the success for urban males. Implications for Access ing Resources for College Barriers for low income families that try to access resources for college include the limited resources that are available for college counseling at low income urban high
51 schools (College Board, 2008a). St udents that come from low income families, with parents or caregivers who may not have completed high school or pursued college college going process. Therefore, students from such families rely heavily on schools to prepare for college (Wimberly & Noeth, 2004). However, it was found that when families from low income communities attempted to prepare their children for college, they often were met with most basic information about college from high school representatives (McDonough, 2004). In this sense, the public school system can be found inadequate in preparing low income, first generation students for colleg e (Martinez & Klopott, 2003) even though the high school is a critical source of information for underserved students to access resources for college National Stakeholders Stakeholders that are situated at the national level have a distinct role in heral ding the status of marginalized, urban youth. National stakeholders have been successful at using evidence based data to raise awareness and advocate for the access to college resources by marginalized students in public education (ASCA, 2010; College Boa rd, 2010; Ed Trust, 2009; No Child Left Behind [NCLB], 2002; Wimberly, 2002) Such professional organizations are discovering and supporting the ways in which education stakeholders position themselves to remove the barriers to high school success and col lege access for historically underrepresented students. accountability for student outcomes. The mandates of NCLB insisted that states assume greater accountability for the educatio nal outcomes of students that historically
52 have been failed by the public school system (Darling Hammond & Friedlaender, 2008; Herr & Erford, 2011; NCLB, 2002). Other national stakeholders have followed suit by investing more effort and resources to narro w ing the achieveme nt gaps in education and improving outcomes for underserved students at public schools (College Board, 20 10 ; The Education Trust [Ed Trust], 2009; Wimberly, 2002). The College Board, founded in 1900, began as a resource to help students with the transition to higher education. Although the mission remains the same, College Board has since been intentional about targeting the issues of college access and success for the most vulnerable and diverse student groups in the United States. In a recent effort to raise awareness of the educational challenges that minority males encounter, the College Board (2010) through their Advocacy and Policy Center, produced The Educational Crisis Facing Young Men of Color The report is a result of exper disparities among females and males of color. om the participants about their experiences as males within the educational system, the data about educational attainment of males, and recommendations for moving forward based on best practices. In summary, the four recommendations for improv ing the educ ati onal status of minority males a re (College Board, 2010) : a need for federal and private collaboration to create a national policy to help improve the educational results of young minority males a need for increased funding and research support on issues impacting the education of minority males
53 a need for more effective collaboration between K 12 through higher education to prepare minority males to access and succeed in college a need to replicate and fund exemplar programs that demonstrate success in e ducating young men of color. The recommendations offered by the experts are reflective of the efforts already initiated by the government (NCLB, 2002), professional school counselors (ASCA, 2005), and invested advocates (College Board, 2010; Ed Trust, 2009 ) to raise awareness of the disparities in education and take action towards securing access to postsecondary education for all students. School Counseling and College Access The American School Counselor Association represents professional school cou nselo rs as key stakeholders and critical educators with i n the school community (ASCA, 2005). Efforts to maintain accountability and quality in the practice of school counseling resulted in the development of ASCA National Standards (Herr & Erford, 2011) and AS CA National Model (2005) The ASCA National Standards differ from the National Model in that the standards delineate the outcomes of appropriately delivered school counseling programs (Bodenhorn & Skaggs, 2005). The scope of ASCA National Model the means by which school counseling programs are delivered (individual counseling, small group and large group counseling, classroom guidance, consultation, coordination and administration of guidance services) (ASCA, 2005). The ASCA National Model was developed u pon the framework of advocacy, leadership, collaboration and systemic change. The model deals explicitly with the achievement gap and charges school counselors to be intentional in their efforts to narrow the gap for marginalized students. School counsel ors are strongly encouraged to use student data and evidence based practices in order to meet the needs of
54 students in their academic, career, per sonal and social development (ASCA, 2005; Stone & Dahir, 2011) Hence, the ASCA National Model and National S tandards are important frameworks for school counselors as they help youth from his torically underserved groups prepare for postsecondary education Another strategy that has implications for improving the outcomes of college bound, marginalized students i s to improve the quality of the preparation of school counselors (Ed Trust, 2009). The Education Trust helped found the Transforming School Counseling Initiative (TSCI) in 1997 to prepare school counselor graduate w income students of color by improving Trust established the National Center for Transforming School Counseling with a similar mission to empower school counselors to b ecome and remain active agents of change seeking ways to transform the school counseling profe ssion through graduate student critical role of school counselors in narrowing the achievement gap and ensure student achievement for historically marginalized groups i n public education. Role of School Counselor Professional school counselors, like teachers, are accountable for the academic succ ess of students (ASCA, 2005). National recognition and support for the role that school counseling has in narrowing the achiev ement gap is evidenced by federal funds that were appropriated for counseling
55 2002). Moreover, school counselors have access t o evidence based resources to assist them in making data driven decisions to enhance student learning (ASCA, 2005; College Board, 2008b; Myrick, 2003 ; Stone & Dahir, 2011 ). School counselors can foster the high academic expectations, school climate and c aring relationships that are found to correlate to the achievement of students that are at greatest risk of dropping out of high school ( Bemak & Chung, 2005; CPE, 2006; Lynn et al., 2010; MCUE, 2009) As part of the career development services provided in a structured counseling program (ASCA, 2005), high school counselors serve as one of the primary liaisons between student and access to college. Thus, the school studen ts and their families as they try to access resources for college. High school counselors help students navigate the college going process by coordinating and organizing the college related events that take place at the high school level. School counselor s also administer and analyze the relevant assessments and inventories that help students explore their career and postsecondary options. The making process may be especially critical for many first gener ation students that rely on school personnel to inform them and their families on the options and resources that are available after high school (King, 1996; Wimberly & Noeth, 2004). School Counselors in Urban Settings Urban schools, more than rural and su burban contexts, experience higher incidences of problems related to cultural diversity, social justice, equity, overcrowding classrooms, access to resources, drugs and violence, and poverty ( Crowder & South, 2003 ) School counseling in the urban context requires a different approach due to
56 challenges that are distinct to inner city schools (Holcomb McCoy, 2004; Lee, 2005). Thus, the roles of school counselors as leaders and advocates are crucial in the context of urban, high poverty schools (Amatea & Wes t Olatunji, 2005; Bemak & Chung, 2005; Ed Trust, 2009; Lee, 2005). Urban school counselors serve at schools where there are often fewer counselors available than the recommended counselor to student ratio of 1:250 (ASCA, 2010). Some urban schools experi ence ratios as high as, or more than, 1:1,000 (College Board, 2008a). Urban, public school counselors spend about a quarter of their time in college counseling, compared to their private school counterparts who spend twice as much of their time in college counseling with their students (College Board, 2008a). The delivery of school counseling services that are responsive to the needs of high poverty urban students should confront such issues in their efforts to help decrease the educational disparities th at are common in urban settings (Bemak & Chung, 2005; Holcomb McCoy, 2004; Lee, 2001). School Counseling and High School Graduation There are indications that effective school counseling practices may positively impact high school graduation, among other s tudent outcomes ( Lapan, Gysbers & Petroski, 2003; Militello, Carey, Dimmitt Lee, V. & Schweid, 2009 ; Stone & Dahir, 2011; Whiston & Quinby, 2009). However, no empirical studies exist that link school counselor self efficacy to high school graduation rat es. One related study was found with a primary purpose to determine the impact of school counseling program implementation to high school graduation rates (Hoffman, 2008). Hoffman (2008) investigated the relationship between school counseling program impl ementation and high school graduation rates. Hoffman distinguished the degree of
57 mor e integrative of the full range of counselor services available. In other words, responsive services refer to providing school counseling interventions from a non comprehensive program approach. Total degree refers to providing services as part of a comp rehensive program. It was reported that high school graduation rates decreased with the implementation of responsive services only program, compared to a long term comprehensive approach, at the junior and high school levels. This finding is supported by research that finds that responsive services have greater impact on student outcomes at the elementary school level than at the secondary level (Whiston & Quinby, 2009). n of comprehensive school guidance programs (ASCA, 2005) rather than the reactive model of counseling that is often reported. Depending on the quality of school counselor s training in implementing school counseling programs ( ASCA, 2005 ), t hey can be an i nvaluable resource within the school School counselors that have adequate continuing education and quality training in the use of ASCA National Standards can be well prepared to collaborat e with and educat e students, parents, teachers, and administrators about how to foster the ideal school environment for success (Ed Trust, 2009). Summary This review of literature presented the challenges that African American males encounter as they enter urban high schools and implicates the role that school counselors have in narrowing the achievement gap. African American males tend to
58 fare worse in the personal, economic and societal consequences if they do not complete high school successfully. Research supports that professional s chool counselors can be change ag ents within the school community (Amatea & West Olatunji, 2007) because they are able to influence many of the school related factors that positively affect student outcomes and, subsequently, the rate of high school graduation and college access for low i ncome students (ASCA, 2005; Myrick, 2003). Although school counselors are expected to link the results of their work to student outcomes, no empirical studies were found that examined the role that school counselor self efficacy has in student achievement. Hence, the purpose of this study is to determine if school counselor self efficacy relate to student outcomes, specifically the rate of high school graduation of males in urban, high poverty high schools. P ioneering researchers of school counselor self efficacy have relied on teacher self efficacy literature to direct their inquiries about the possible relationships of school counselor self efficacy to student outcomes (Bodenhorn & Skaggs, 2005; McCoach & Colbert, 2010; Sutton & Fall, 1995). Given the w ell documented challenges that are encountered at urban, underperforming high schools (Crowder & South, 2003; Darling & Friedlaender, 2008; NCES, 2010), self efficacy is offer ed as a framework from which to discuss how school counselors function to overcom e difficulties and accomplish their task specific goals in such school settings Chapter Three delineates the methodological design and procedures that were used for the study Details are provided about the setting, participants, access to the participan ts and schools, and the operational definition of variables for the research study. The reliability and validity will be described for the School Counselor Self
59 Efficacy Scale. The chapter concludes with the procedures that were used for data collection and data analysis.
60 CHAPTER 3 METHODOLOGY efficacy within the context of urban schools. Also explored in this study was the role of urban school counselors in the rates of high school completion for A frican American male students. The purpose of this study was to examine how school counselor self efficacy relates to the rate of graduation for males at urban, underperforming, predominantly African American schools. This chapter details the methodology and statistical procedures used for the study. Setting The setting for this study was seventeen underperforming, predominantly African American schools located in three urban districts in Florida: Jacksonville, Miami, and Orlando. Urban refers to the cl assification of large cities that have at least 1,000 people per square miles (US Census, 2000). The schools sampled for this study had a mean enrollment of 1,777, ranging from 953 to 2,823 students, for the last two reported years of 2009 and 2008 (FLDOE 2010). Underperforming schools were limited to those mandated yearly progress indicators, for at least two consecutive years. The schools were defined as predominantly African American if they enrolled a majority compared among the largest racial/ethnic groups reported for each school. In other words, African American students comprised the majority group of enrollment, even when they were less than 50% of the total population For example three of the schools had slightly less than 50% of African American students, but Hispanic and
61 White student percentages were less than African American enrollment. The African American enrollment of t he sample schools ranged from 48% to 98.5%. T he mean ratio of females to males wa s 1:1 The school membership for 2008 2009 and 2007 2008 are presented in Table 3 1 and Table 3 2, respectively. Participants The population for this study was profess io nal school counselors employed at the sample schools. There were n = 76 school coun selors eligible to participate in the study. The resultant sampling of school counselors was n = 64 (84.21%) counselors, whose responses were analyzed for this study. The number of school counselors at each school range d from two to seven The mean number of school counselors per schools is four The mean counselor to student ratio is 1:364 (see Table 3 3). Access to Participants Permission to conduct the study was obtai Institutional Review Board (UFIRB). Permission to gain access to the schools and conduct the research was departments The participants were invited to participate in the study through email and phone calls. Informed consent was obtained in person, by the researcher, at each e fficacy questionnaires (Bodenhorn & Skaggs, 2005 ; Tschannen Moran & Woolfolk Hoy, 2001 ) were administered at the school s ites by the researcher Operational Definition of Variables School Counselor Level Variables School Counselor Self Efficacy Beliefs (SCE) (efficacy expectations) refer to the assessment about their capabilities to achieve expected outc omes in their general practice (Bodenhorn & Skaggs, 2005). Five domains of school counselor
62 self efficacy beliefs are personal and social development, leadership and assessment, career and academic development, collaboration and consultation, and cultural acceptance. The School Counselor Self Efficacy Scale measure d this variable. Sense of Efficacy about Engaging African American Male Students (EAME) (outcome expectancy) was measured by the Efficacy in Student Engagement (ESE) of Efficacy Scale (Tschannen Moran & Woolfolk Hoy, of their efforts to engage students. The ESE was adapted to determine school in general and African American male students at their schools. Gender is the part identification as female or male. Years of Teaching refers to the time that participants practiced as professional classroom instructors, apart from profess ional school counseling. This variable was self reported. Years of Counseling refers to the time that participants practiced as professional school counselors. This variable was self reported. ASCA refers to if the respondents received training in implem enting the ASCA National S tandards. This variable was self reported. School Level Variables Student enrollment for the 2008 2009 academic year is the total number of students that attended each school as reported to FLDOE. Black (African American) student enrollment is the percentage of Black students that attended each school as reported to FLDOE.
63 Percentage of students on free reduced lunch program (FRLP) refers to the students who participated in the federal free and reduced lunch program (FRLP) due to significant to this study as it relates to a significant population of low income students that are enrolled in the sampled schools. The national average of students that are eligible for FRLP at public schools is estimated at 40.37% (n = 19,900,000) compared to 1 and 3 2). Graduation Rates refers to the percen tage of male students at each school that earned a standard diploma or GED within four years of entry into ninth grade. Due to the discrepancies of national and state reports of graduation rates (AEE, 2009; FLDOE, 2010; Heckman & LaFontaine, 2010; NCES, 2 010), this study used the graduation rates from the NCLB SPARS (FLDOE, 2009). The graduation rates that were calculated for Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) included students who received standard high school diplomas and State of Florida diploma through a GED program within four years of entry into ninth grade (FLDOE, 2010). See Tables 3 4 and 3 5. Participation in university partnership refers to those schools that are affiliated with a special program, University of Florida (UF) Alliance. The UF Allian ce is a university school partnership that aims to increase the number of students from underrepresented backgrounds that access higher education. The program partners with high schools in three major urban districts in Florida in initiatives such as grad e nine transition into high school, parental engagement, student leadership development, mentoring, and professional development for teachers and administrators. Also, students from the
64 partnering high schools that are admitted to the University of Florid a are eligible for a limited number of scholarships that support first generation students to college. Instrumentation The instrumentation for this study was two surveys and demographic data sheet. The surveys were the School Counselor Self Efficacy Scal e (SCSE) (Bodenhorn & Sense of Self Efficacy Scale (TES) (Tschannen Moran & Woolfolk Hoy, 2001), an adapted version of the ESE for African American male students (EAME), and the researcher developed demographic data sheet (Appendix B). The latest versions of the Appendix A). The SCSE counselor self 2010). The 43 Likert type items of the SCSE were created using the ASCA National S tandards for practice In three studies, Bodenhorn and her colleagues reported reliab ility coefficients of .95, .96, and .97 for the scale scores, respectively (Bodenhorn & Skaggs, 2005; Bodenhorn et al., 2010). training, are Personal and Social Development Leaders hip and Assessment Career and Academic Development Collaboration and Cultural Acceptance (ASCA, 2005). The subscales had demonstrated reliabilities of .91 (personal and social development), .90 (leadership and assessment), .85 (career and academic devel opment), .87 (collaboration and consultation), and .72 (cultural acceptance) (2005).
65 The SCSE was measured for construct validity and compared to general counseling self efficacy (Counseling Self Estimate Inventory), social desirability (The Social Desirab ility Scale), anxiety (State Trait Anxiety Inventory, and general self confidence (The Tennessee Self Concept Scale) (Bodenhorn & Skaggs, 2005). The SCSE correlated strongest to the counseling self efficacy construct at .41, and less significantly to soci al desirability, anxiety, and general self confidence with coefficient alphas of .30, .42, .32, .16, respectively. Respondents were prompted to indicate their confidence in their ability to perform such tasks as ind Speak in front of large groups such as faculty or parent and services for o competence and analysis of tasks related to the teaching contexts (Tschannen Moran & Woolfolk Hoy, 2001). The ESE subscale measures to what degree do educators believe the y can engage students while considering their abilities, resources and opportunity to engage students within their current work environment. Sample items include How much can you do to motivate students who show low interest in school work? and How muc h can you assist families in helping their children do well in school? male students, the ESE was adapted to become Efficacy to Engage African American Male Students (EAME).
66 How much can you do to motivate African American males who show low interest in school work? How much can you assist families in helping their African American males do well in school? The demographic data sheet is a 4 item questionnaire. Participants were asked to provide their (a) gender, (b) number of years of teaching experience, (c) number of years of schoo l counseling practice, and (d) if they received training in implementing the ASCA National Standards. The demographic data sheet follows the SCSE, ESE, and EAME items Data Collection existing archives from the School Grades and NCLB School Public Accountability Reports (SPARS) on the FLDOE website (see Tables 3 4 and 3 5). Based on the criteria for classifying schools as urban, underperforming, and predominantly African American, 18 s chools from four urban districts were eligible to participate in this study. However, one school was excluded because it was the only school in its district to meet the criteria and therefore had a greater chance of being identified in this study. It was deemed ethical to exclude the district and school from this study due to concerns about anonymity and confidentiality of potential participants (Creswell, 2008). The schools within the three remaining districts met the criteria and were invited to parti cipate in the study. In order to protect the privacy of the participants in this study, The alphanumeric identifier allowed the researcher to conduct the statistical an alyses without disclosing the identity of any school.
67 Data Analysis Data was analyzed at two levels within the school system: school counselor level (efficacy and demographic data) and school level (profile data and graduation rates) (see Table 3 6). G iven the nested structure of school counselors within the school system, hierarchical linear modeling (HLM) was conducted to examine the research questions as it takes into account the variance that is contributed from different levels of data within organ izational structures (Raudenbush & Bryk, 2002). Counselor characteristics are considered level 1 data and school characteristics are level 2 data. A descriptive analysis was conducted, using SAS programming, to report the mean differences of self efficacy by counselor level and school level characteristics, respectively. A hierarchical linear regression model (HLM) was developed to analyze efficacy (about their work and engaging African American males) and both le vels of data (counselor and school). A t test was run to compare the mean differences of graduation rates for males between partner and non partner high schools within the study. Hierarchical linear modeling (HLM) is an approach that is becoming increasin gly popular in education research, as most data collected within education belong to some hierarchical structure (Lapan, Gysbers & Sun, 1997; Raudenbush & Bryk, 2002; Singer, 1998). Hierarchical linear modeling accounts for the outcomes of groups as a fun ction of both group and individual characteristics (Arnold, 1992). Traditional linear model analyses do not take into account the variance from multilevel data that occurs in naturally hierarchical systems (Raudenbush & Bryk, 2002). In contrast to such s ingle level models as Pearson and Spearman correlations, HLM provides more rigorous examination of individual effects as they operate within larger social structures
68 (Paterson & Goldstein, 1991). The use of traditional single level models for truly hierar chical data may result in conceptual and technical dilemmas such as: a demonstration of unreliability in statistical estimates, diminished ability to detect effects at the various levels within an organization, and incorrect standard errors due to the clus tering of levels (p.391). Thus, HLM is more appropriate for nested research designs than simple linear regression models and correlations (Sampson, Raudenbush & Earls, 1997). Hierarchical linear modeling is often used with large sample sizes. It is sug gested that studies have at least 25 higher level units and 100 participants for more accurate estimates (Paterson & Goldstein, 1991, p.391). The researcher ran an unconditional model, one way ANOVA with random effects to determine what proportion of tota l variance was due to between school variance. Despite the resultant sample being smaller than is recommended for HLM, enough total variance between schools existed to warrant the use of HLM for this study (Raudenbush & Bryk, 2002). Using the reported v ariance parameter estimates, an intraclass correlation coefficient was calculated to determine what proportion of total variance, or cluster effect, was due to between school variance in order to proceed with HLM analyses for this sample size (Singer, 1998 ). The intraclass correlation coefficients for SCE and EAME scores were calculated using the formula, = oo / oo + 2 where oo is the between school variance and 2 is the within school variance A general guideline for intraclass correlation for K 12 research is a range of .05 to .15, with the average for low socioeconomic status schools being .19 (He dges & Hedberg, 2007). Thus, the resultant intraclass correlation for SCE and EAME are higher than the
6 9 acceptable range. The intraclass correlation for SCE was .299, indicating that 29.9% of the total variance was due to between school variance in SCE sc ores. Similarly, 18.6% of the total variance was due to between school variance in EAME scores (see Table 3 7) Summary This chapter included a description of the setting, participants, how access to participants was obtained, operational definitions of t he variables, and instrumentation. Also included were the details of data collection and how the data was analyzed. Chapter Four will include the results of the data analyses.
70 Table 3 1. 2008 2009 School membership by category School Grade Enrollment % Female % Male % White % Black % FRLP S1 F 1341 57.9 42.1 5.2 91.2 57.9 S2 F 1217 47.5 52.5 1.4 53.6 79.3 S3 D 2007 48.1 51.9 36.9 49.7 39.0 S4 D 2057 48.8 51.2 3.0 85.0 52.0 S5 F 2217 47.0 53.0 40.2 51.8 28.9 S6 F 1131 49.8 50.2 4.7 92.9 53.8 S7 D 1036 55.3 44.7 0.9 95.5 64.7 S8 D 2090 53.4 46.6 0.4 88.0 67.5 S9 D 1788 45.6 54.4 0.6 81.0 64.8 S10 F 1042 45.4 54.6 0.2 90.7 73.5 S11 D 1725 49.8 50.2 0.6 94.4 59.3 S12 F 2096 55.3 44.7 0.1 94.0 73.4 S13 D 1593 48.0 52.0 28.8 54.4 46.2 S14 D 267 7 47.6 52.4 1.6 81.9 50.2 S15 D 2171 48.4 51.6 10.4 48.3 56.7 S16 D 1769 46.9 53.1 35.2 50.7 37.4 S17 F 1077 52.2 47.8 0.6 98.5 61.5 Source: Florida School Indicators Report by Florida Department of Education, 2009. Retrieved October 26, 2010, from ht tp://www.fldoe.org/eias/eiaspubs/0809fsir.asp
71 Table 3 2. 2007 2008 School membership by category School Grade Enrollment % Female % Male % White % Black % FRLP S1 F 1611 57.7 42.3 7.3 88.9 46.9 S2 D 1349 48.0 52.0 1.2 54.2 74.7 S3 F 2190 50.9 49 .1 38.9 49.3 30.9 S4 D 1983 49.3 50.7 3.3 84.0 55.0 S5 D 2401 48.4 51.6 42.7 50.4 23.2 S6 D 953 51.1 48.9 4.8 93.3 44.0 S7 D 1065 54.9 45.1 0.8 96.1 56.9 S8 F 2469 53.1 46.9 0.6 88.3 59.5 S9 F 2086 46.1 53.9 0.6 80.7 71.6 S10 F 1150 47.7 5 2.3 0.2 89.4 68.7 S11 F 1852 50.6 49.4 0.6 94.2 59.2 S12 D 2442 54.9 45.1 0.1 93.7 60.6 S13 F 1870 48.1 51.9 30.5 53.7 35.0 S14 F 2823 46.2 53.8 1.3 81.4 44.4 S15 D 2074 48.1 51.9 10.2 49.6 31.5 S16 D 1848 47.8 52.2 38.5 49.6 31.5 S17 F 1249 52.9 47.1 0.6 98.3 48.7 Source: Florida School Indicators Report by Florida Department of Education, 2009. Retrieved October 26, 2010, from http://www.fldoe.org/eias/eiaspubs/0708fsir.asp
72 Table 3 3. School Counselor to Student Ratios School Counselors Students Counselor : Student S1 3 1160 1 : 387 S2 2 1054 1 : 527 S3 4 1850 1 : 463 S4 6 1957 1 : 326 S5 5 2034 1 : 407 S6 4 1003 1 : 251 S7 3 1090 1 : 363 S8 5 1844 1 : 369 S9 4 1 660 1 : 415 S10 5 918 1 : 184 S11 5 1582 1 : 316 S12 6 1792 1 : 299 S13 4 1684 1 : 421 S14 7 2766 1 : 395 S15 5 1955 1 : 391 S16 4 1698 1 : 425 S17 4 994 1 : 249 Total 76 27041 Mean ratio 1 : 364
73 Table 3 4. 2008 2009 G raduation rates School All Students White Black Low Income Female Male S1 59.7 65.4 58.4 59.2 69.3 45.8 S2 52.3 nr 56.4 54.9 56.7 48.1 S3 53.3 53.2 50.7 44.4 61.1 45.6 S4 72.3 84.6 72.3 72.5 74.2 70.2 S5 74.5 69.2 78.9 64 76.5 72.6 S6 56.6 30 57.7 56 .3 61.6 50.9 S7 72 25 72.9 67.2 76.6 66 S8 58.6 20 60.1 58.5 63.7 52.1 S9 61.2 75 65.8 61.5 63.5 59 S10 48.4 50 52.9 51.8 52.9 44.9 S11 58.3 nr 58.6 61.3 60.1 56.5 S12 65.5 nr 66.6 64.2 71.9 56.1 S13 58.2 57.9 57.5 53.4 65.8 50.5 S14 62.1 54.5 62.5 64.6 60.3 63.7 S15 69.1 75.8 68.5 67.5 69.6 68.5 S16 69.5 75.3 67.2 61 77.2 61.8 S17 54.9 nr 55.1 52.7 58.4 51.4 Florida 76.2 83.8 63.3 65.1 80 72.3 Source: School District and State Public Accountability Report by Florida Department of Education, 2 010. Retrieved October 26, 2010, from http://doeweb prd.doe.state.fl.us/eds/nclbspar/year0910/main0910.cfm
74 Tabl e 3 5. 2007 2008 Graduation r ates School All Students White Black Low Income Female Male S1 56.2 71.9 54.2 47.4 60.2 49.5 S2 48.4 nr 50.3 49.5 49.7 46.3 S3 58.1 60.9 54.8 42.5 63.5 50.7 S4 62.7 52.9 62.7 61.3 65.6 59.5 S5 70.1 67 .7 72.1 56.7 74.4 64.4 S6 51.1 88.9 48.4 48.3 57.5 45.7 S7 61.1 100 59.9 65.9 69.6 48.8 S8 54 nr 56.4 51.7 57.4 49.5 S9 54.1 nr 56.2 53.8 57 51 S10 38.4 nr 38.9 41.2 39.2 36.5 S11 61.1 nr 61.6 58.8 65.6 56.2 S12 59.6 nr 61.2 58.8 63.9 54.2 S13 58.8 64.5 56.7 53.7 66.1 51.5 S14 50.8 26.3 49.8 50 54.7 47 S15 61.7 81.5 56.7 59 60.1 63.2 S16 63.3 70.3 58 56.5 65.2 61.7 S17 56.3 33.3 56.4 51.9 62.5 49.6 Florida 72.8 81.4 58.7 61.1 76.8 68.7 Source: School District and State Public Accountability Re port by Florida Department of Education, 2010. Retrieved October 26, 2010, from http://doeweb prd.doe.state.fl.us/eds/nclbspar/year0809/main0809.cfm that data was not reported to FLDOE
75 Table 3 6. Counselor and School Level Data Counselor and School Level Data Counselor Level Description SCE School counselor self efficacy beliefs EAME Efficacy to engage African American male students Gender Pa rticipant gender (1 = female, 2 = male) Years teaching Number of years employed as instructional teacher Years counselin g Number of years employed as professional school counselors ASCA Received training in the implementation of ASCA National Standards (1 = yes, 2 = no) School Level 09 Total enrollment Number of students enrolled at each school Black enrollment Percentage of African American/Black student enrolled at each school 09 Graduation rate Percentage of male students that graduated in four yea rs for 2008 2009 at each school FRLP Percentage of students at each school that enroll and participate in the free reduced lunch program Partner school partnership program (0 = no, 1 = yes)
76 Table 3 7. Resu lts from One Way Random Effects Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) Model Estimate SE P value Intraclass Correlation Average EAME score ( oo ) 184.44 3.4423 <.0001 Total SCE School level variance ( oo ) 120.44 70.0401 0.0428 29.9% Score Counselor level va riance ( 2 ) 282.80 57.6365 <.0001 Average EAME score ( oo ) 27.1646 0.9111 <.0001 Total EAME School level variance ( oo ) 6.3383 4.6885 0.0882 18.6% Score Counselor level variance ( 2 ) 27.6917 5.5553 <.0001
77 CHAPTER 4 RESULTS The purpose o f this study was to investigate how school counselor self efficacy is associated with the rate of high school completion for males at urban, predominantly African American, underperforming schools. Participants from sampled schools completed a survey inst rument that measured their self efficacy about work (SCE), their efficacy about engaging African American male students (EAME), and demographic information. Seventeen sampled schools in three urban areas in Florida were invited to participate in the study Of the total number of counselors eligible to participate, n = 64 completed and returned the survey. The resulting response rate of 84% is higher than the acceptable rate of 50%, or better, for rigorous, peer reviewed research (Creswell, 2008). Given that school counselors operate within a naturally hierarchical structure (school system) and school level data was used for this study (school graduation rate), hierarchical linear regression analysis (HLM) was conducted to examine the relevant research qu estions. This chapter includes the data analyses and results. Reliability The School Counselor Self Efficacy Scale (Bodenhorn & Skaggs, 2005) is a 43 item, Likert type measure of school counselor self efficacy about general school counseling practice. Th e items on the SCE prompt participants to rate their confidence to perform specific tasks on a scale of 1 (not confident) to 5 (highly confident). The The EAME is a 4 item, adapted, Likert engage African American male students at their schools (Tschannen Moran & Woolfolk Hoy, 2001). The items prompted the counselors to indicate their opinions about
78 engaging African American male students on a scale of 1 (not at all) to 9 (a great deal). reliability. Descriptive Statistics Counselor Level Descriptive Information The participants completed a questionnaire that allowed them to provide their gender, number of years of teaching, number of years of counseling, and if they had ever received training on the implementation of the ASCA National Standards. Of the 64 respondents, 80% (n = 51) were females and 20% (n = 13) were males. The average years of teaching was 6.40 years (SD = 8.01), with a range of no teaching experience to 30 years of work as a teacher. One participant did not provide the number of years of teaching. The average years of counseling was 10 .29 years (SD = 7.51), with some counselors being in their first year of practice (0 years) to veteran counselors of 35 years. One respondent did not provide the number of years of counseling. Forty four (70%) participants reported that they received tra ining in the implementation of ASCA National Standards and 19 participants (30%) reported that they had never received training on the ASCA standards. One participant did not provide a response to the ASCA item (see Table 4 1). The average SCE score was 183.28 (SD = 20.10), with a range of 111 to 212. The higher SCE scores indicate greater self efficacy about performing school counseling related tasks. The average EAME score was 27.06 (SD = 5.85), with a range of 12 to 36. The higher EAME scores indic ate a greater sense of efficacy in engaging African American males at their schools (see Table 4 2).
79 School Level Descriptive Information The average number of students enrolled at the sampled schools for the 2008 2009 year was 1707.88 (SD = 480.84), w ith a range of 1036 to 2677. Overall, the schools have an enrollment that is comprised of about 50% male students. The average enrollment of White students is 10.20% (SD = 14.47) and the Black student enrollment is an average of 76.31% (SD = 18.90). The average percentage of students that are eligible for FRLP is 57.16% (SD = 13.73). The mean graduation rate for males at the schools is 58.68 (SD = 8.85) (see Table 4 3). The average counselor to student ratio is 1:364, which is higher than the 1:250 rec ommended ratio (ASCA, 2010). See Table 4 3. Five of the sampled schools (29%) participate in the University of Florida Alliance partnership program. The purpose of the partnership to increase the number of students from underrepresented backgrounds tha t access higher education. The program partners with high schools in three urban districts in Florida in initiatives such as grade nine transition into high school, parental engagement, student leadership development, mentoring, and professional developme nt for teachers and administrators. Also, students from the partnering high schools that are admitted to the University of Florida are eligible for a limited number of scholarships that support first generation students to college. Data Analyses Two HLM m odels for SCE and EAME scores were developed, using SAS PROC MIXED programming, to examine the research questions (see Table 4 4). Technically, three steps are integral to using PROC MIXED in order to fit HLM models with two level data (Singer, 1998). Th e first step is to fit an unconditional means model, or what is
80 considered a one way random effects ANOVA model, across the schools. The next step is to examine the effects of level 1 outcomes (EAME and SCE scores) as a function of both counselor (level 1 ) and school (level 2) predictors. The third step is to combine the two types of predictors that resulted from steps one and two into a final multilevel model. The resultant unconditional means models for SCE and EAME scores are as follows: SCE ij = 0 0 + u 0j + r ij EAME ij = 00 + u 0j + r ij where 00 = school means u 0j = variation intercepts between schools, and r ij = variation within the school The resultant final HLM models for SCE and EAME, incorporating the unconditional models, are as follo ws: SCE ij = 00 + 01 (Years of teaching) + 02 (Years of counseling) + 03 (Gender) + 04 (ASCA) + 05 (Total students enrolled) + 06 (% of Black students enrolled) + 07 (FRLP) + 08 (2009 graduation rate for males) + 09 (ASCA x Years of counseling) + u 0j + r ij and EAME ij = 00 + 01 (Years of teaching) + 02 (Years of counseling) + 03 (Gender) + 04 (ASCA) + 05 (Total students enrolled) + 06 (% of Black students enrolled) + 07 (FRLP) + 08 (2009 graduation rate for males) + 09 (ASCA x Years of counseling) + u 0j + r ij
81 efficacy about their work and about engaging African American male students are analyzed as a function of both counselor level and school level predictors. Hypothesis One The first sub hypothesis tested was: Ho1a: Ther e is no association between school counselor self efficacy beliefs about work and the counselor level characteristics of gender, number of years of teaching, number of years of counseling, and training in ASCA National Standards. Results from HLM analysi s showed that, at the alpha level p = 0.05, there were no efficacy beliefs about work and any of the tested counselor level characteristics (see Table 4 4). Based on the reported value s, number of years of teaching (t = 0.49, p = 0.63), number of years of counseling (t = 0.19, p = 0.85), gender (t = 1.14, p = 0.29), and training in the implementation of ASCA National Standards (t = 0.72, p = 0.49) have no statistically significant as efficacy beliefs about work. Thus, the first null sub hypothesis one was not rejected. The second part of hypothesis one was: Ho1b: There is no association between school counselor self efficacy beliefs about work and the school level characteristics of 2009 total student enrollment, Black student enrollment, enrollment of students in the free reduced lunch program, and the 2009 graduation rates for males. At the alpha level p = 0.05, results indicated that there we re no statistically significant associations between school counselor self efficacy beliefs about work and
82 the total number of students enrolled (t = 0.54, p = 0.60), percentage of Black students enrolled (t = 0.12, p = 0.91), percentage of students enro lled in the free reduced lunch program (t = 1.70, p = 0.11), and the 2009 graduation rates for males (t = 0.26, p = 0.80). The null hypothesis that there is no association between school counselor self efficacy beliefs about work and the school level c haracteristics was not rejected. See Table 4 4. Hypothesis Two The first part of hypothesis two was: Ho2a: There is no association between school counselor sense of efficacy to engage African American male students and the counselor level characterist ics of gender, number of years of teaching, number of years of counseling, and training in ASCA National Standards. Results from the analysis showed that, at the alpha level p = 0.05, the number of years that a school counselor spent working as a counselor was significantly associated with their sense of efficacy to engage African American male students (t = 3.32 p = 0.002). Gender, specifically being a male counselor, was significantly associated with the sense of efficacy to engage African American mal e students (t = 3.63, p = 0.0067). Also, a significant interaction was found between the number of years of counseling and having received training in the implementation of ASCA National Standards (t = 3.07, p = 0.0039). The main effects of years of tea ching (t = 0.98, p = 0.33) and ASCA training (t = 0.13, p to engage African American male students. Given that three of the five counselor level characteristics were significan t, the null sub hypothesis was rejected. See Table 4 5 The second part of hypothesis two was:
83 Ho2b: There is no association between school counselor sense of efficacy to engage African American male students and the school level characteristics of 2009 total student enrollment, Black student enrollment, enrollment of students in the free reduced lunch program, and the 2009 graduation rates for males. At the alpha level p = 0.50, there were no statistically significant associations se of efficacy to engage African American male students and the total number of students enrolled (t = 0.60, p = 0.56), percentage of Black students enrolled (t = 0.30, p = 0.77), percentage of students enrolled in the free reduced lunch program (t = 0.1 7, p = 0.87), and the 2009 graduation rates for males (t = 0.83, p = 0.42). The null sub hypothesis was not rejected. See Table 4 5. Hypothesis Three The third hypothesis tested was: Ho3: There is no relationship between school counselor self efficacy beliefs about work and the 2009 graduation rates for males. At the alpha level p = 0.50, the standard error of 0.53 yielded an observed t statistics of 0.26 ( p = 0.80). This result indicates that the null hypothesis was not rejected as there was no sign efficacy about their general practice and the rate of high school completion for males (see Table 4 4). Hypothesis Four The fourth hypothesis tested was: Ho4: There is no relationship between school counselo r sense of efficacy to engage African American male students and the 2009 graduation rates for males. Results from the analysis showed that, at the alpha level p = 0.05, a standard error of 0.11 yielded an observed t statistics of 0.83 ( p = 0.42), which indicates that there is
84 African American male students and the rate of high school completion for males (see Table 4 5). Thus, the null hypothesis was rejected. Hyp othesis Five The fifth hypothesis tested the relationships between school counselor self efficacy (about work and engaging African American male students) and the graduation rates for males and partnership affiliation. Simple statistics were run to compar e the mean differences of partner and non partner schools in their rates of graduation for males in 2009. The resultant statistics are displayed in Table 4 6. For the mean differences, the pooled 95% interval was reported. Although schools affiliated with the university partnership had a slightly higher rate of graduation for males at 58.12% (SD = 9.24), compared to non partner school rates of 56.1% (SD = 9.34), the group t test indicated that there were no statistically significant differences between the two groups (t = 0.41, p = 0.69) (see Table 4 7). The first part of hypothesis five was: Ho5a: There is no relationship between school counselor self efficacy beliefs about work and 2009 graduation rates for males and partnership affiliation. The re sultant HLM analysis showing the fixed effects of school counselor self efficacy about work by graduation rates and partnership affiliation is displayed in Table 4 8. At the alpha level p = .05, there were no statistically significant relationship betwe en school counselor self efficacy and 2009 graduation rates for male (t = 2.01, p = 0.06) and partnership affiliation (t = 0.64, p = 0.53). Thus, the null hypothesis was not rejected. The second part of hypothesis five was:
85 Ho5b : There is no relationship between school counselor sense of efficacy to engage African American male students and 2009 graduation rates for males and partnership affiliation. The resultant HLM analysis showing the fixed effects of counselor sense of efficacy to engage African American male students by graduation rates and partnership affiliation is displayed in Table 4 9. At the alpha level p = .05, there were no statistically significant relationship between counselor sense of efficacy to engage African American male stud ents and 2009 graduation rates for male (t = 1.05, p = 0.31) and partnership affiliation (t = 0.72, p = 0.48). The null hypothesis was not rejected because statistically significant relationships did not exist. Summary In this chapter, the results of des criptive and HLM analyses were presented for data at the counselor and school levels. The analyses were conducted to take into account the variance that each level of data contributes to the full regression model. Thus, more conservative estimates of eff ects resulted than would be found in single level analyses (Raudenbush & Bryk, 2002). There were no significant associations found between school counselor self efficacy (about work and about engaging African American male students) and the rate of high school graduation for males at urban, predominantly African American, underperforming schools in 2009. However, having a higher sense of efficacy to engage African American male students was associated with having more years of counseling experience and b eing a male counselor. Having more years of counseling experience and receiving training in the implementation of ASCA National Standards were significantly associated with higher sense of efficacy to engage African American
86 male students. Also, no signi efficacy (about work and engaging African American male students) and their affiliation with a university partnership program that targets first generation students.
87 Table 4 1. Counselor demographic information Variable n (%) Mean (SD) Range Gender Female Male 51 (80) 13 (20) Years as teacher* 6.40 (8.01) 0 30 Years as counselor* 10.29 (7.51) 0 35 ASCA training* Yes No 44 (70) 19 (30) *missing data for 1 participant
88 Table 4 2. School Counselor Self Efficacy (SCE) and Efficacy to Engage African American Male Students (EAME) descriptive statistics Variable n (%) Mean (SD) Range SCE 64 (100) 183.28 (20.10) 111 212 EAME 64 (100) 27.06 (5.85) 12 36
89 Table 4 3 School level descriptive statistics Variable Mean (SD) Range 2008 2009 student enrollment 1812.67 (480.84) 1036 2677 % Black student enrollment 76.31 (18.90) 48.3 98.5 % Free reduced lunch program 57.16 (13.73) 28.9 85.0 Graduation rate for ma les 58.68 (8.85) 44.9 72.6 Counselor to student ratio 1 : 364 (1 : 71) 1 : 184 1 : 527
90 Table 4 4. Results of fixed effects for SCE in Hierarchical Linear Model (HLM) Effect Estimate SE DF t Value Pr > |t| Intercept 186.78 7.80 12 23.93 <.0001 Years teaching 0.179 0.369 39 0.49 0.6303 Years counseling 0.1546 0.8127 39 0.19 0.8502 Gender 7.2649 6.3751 8 1.14 0.2874 ASCA 4.3564 6.0469 8 0.72 0.4918 Years counseling*ASCA 0.9079 0.9053 39 1 0.3221 200 9 Total Enrolled 0.0048 0.008965 12 0.54 0.6002 2009 Black Enrolled 0.0241 0.1996 12 0.12 0.9059 2009 Male Graduation Rate 0.1414 0.5343 12 0.26 0.7958 2009 FRLP 0.5329 0.3131 12 1.7 0.1145 Note: Significant at = 0.05 level
91 Table 4 5. Results of fixed effects for EAME in HLM Effect Estimate SE DF t Value Pr > |t| Intercept 32.0434 1.9821 12 16.17 <.0001 Years teaching 0.09834 0.1003 39 0.98 0.333 Years counseling 0.7174 0.2163 39 3.32 0.002 Gender 6.115 1.6866 8 3.63 0.0067 ASCA 0.1972 1.5719 8 0.13 0.9033 Years counseling*ASCA 0.7323 0.2389 39 3.07 0.0039 2009 Total Enrolled 0.0012 0.00 2 12 0.6 0.5579 2009 Black Enrolled 0.01309 0.0440 12 0.3 0.7713 2009 Male Graduation Rate 0.09546 0.1146 12 0.83 0.421 2009 FRLP 0.01181 0.0682 12 0.17 0.8654 Note: Significant at = 0.05 level
92 Table 4 6. Simple statistics for 2009 male graduation rates by partnership affiliation Partner Status Method Mean 95% CL Mean SD 95% CL Std De v No 56.1 50.163 62.03 7 9.34 4 6.619 15.86 5 Yes 58.12 46.646 69.59 4 9.24 1 5.536 26.553 Diff (1 2) Pooled 2.02 13.496 9.456 Note: Pooled 95% interval assumes equal variances between partner and non partnership school.
93 Table 4 7 Group t test for 2009 male graduation rates by partnership affiliation Method Variances DF t Value Pr > |t| Pooled Equal 15 0.41 0.6895
94 Table 4 8. Results of fixed effects for SCE by graduation rates and partnership affiliation in HLM Effect Esti mate SE DF t Value Pr > |t| Intercept 180.89 5.75 14 31.45 <.0001 2009 Male graduation r ate 0.73 0.37 14 2.01 0.06 Partnership affiliation 4.47 6.94 14 0.64 0.53
95 Table 4 9. Results of fixed effects for EAME by graduation rates and partne rship affiliation in HLM Effect Estimate SE DF t Value Pr > |t| Intercept 26.10 1.62 14 16.13 <.0001 2009 Male graduation r ate 0.11 0.10 14 1.05 0.31 Partnership affiliation 1.42 1.96 14 0.72 0.48
96 CHAPTER 5 DISCUSSION The purpose of this s tudy was to examine the relationship between school counselor self efficacy and high school completion for males at urban, predominantly African American, underperforming schools. School counselor self efficacy was conceptualized as both the efficacy to p erform school counseling related tasks ( efficacy expectations ) and the efficacy to engage African American male students ( outcome expectancy ) at their schools. Included in this chapter are the discussion of the findings, limitations, implications, and rec ommendations for future research. School Counselor Self Efficacy Scale (SCE) (Bodenhorn & Skaggs, 2005), an adapted version of the subscale of the Teacher Efficacy Scale (Tschan nen Moran & Woolfolk Hoy, 2001), the Efficacy to Engage African American Male Students (EAME), and a researcher developed demographic questionnaire. School demographic data was retrieved from the Florida Department of Education website. Sixty four profes sional school counselors, from 17 sampled schools, throughout three large school districts in Florida participated in the study. In order to capture the significant, interdependent effects that may be occurring among counselor level and school level varia bles, a hierarchical linear model was used to analyze the data. Discussion The resultant participant demographic data that was presented in Chapter Four is consistent with the findings of previous studies on school counselor self efficacy (Bodenhorn & Skag gs, 2005; Bodenhorn et al., 2010). In this study, it was found that the majority of school counselors tended to be female, had fewer years of experience as
97 counselors, an d about three quarter of the sampled counselors reported that they received training in the implementation of ASCA National Standards. Also, the mean counselor caseload of 1:364 reported in this study is consistent with national findings that urban school counselors often have higher than the recommended caseload of 1:250 (ASCA, 2010). In previous studies on school counselor self efficacy (SCE), the majority of the collec ted for this study, the majority of respondents were observed to be of African or African Caribbean descent. Participants reported moderately high school counselor self efficacy about their work The mean SCE scores found in this study were consistent wi th previous studies that aggregated mean scores by setting (urban, suburban, rural) and by school levels (Bodenhorn & Skaggs, 2005). Thus, the resultant descriptive data suggests that counselors that serve in urban, predominantly African American, underpe rforming high schools may share the fundamental characteristics of The counselors reported feeling moderate levels of efficacy to engage African American male students (EAME) at their schools. However, comparisons to previous findings cannot be made about the resultant data for EAME scores as no previous studies were found that used the sub scale with a school counselor population. However, findings related to demograp hic data and school counselor self efficacy seem to suggest that there may not be much difference between the levels of perceived efficacy for counselors at schools that receive poorer marks of performance and
98 counselors at more nationally representative s chools. This suggests that school counselors at various types of schools may have similar levels of confidence to do their jobs, but may face limitations in the resources available to realize more positive changes within their work environment. The first hypothesis addressed the association between school counselor self efficacy about work and a) counselor level characteristics and b) school level characteristics. Again, school counselor self efficacy beliefs about work were treated, within this study, as one strand of self efficacy: efficacy expectations. For both parts of hypothesis one, no significant associations were found when using HLM analysis. Thus, the findings suggest that although school counselors may report a high level of confidence abou t their work, there are no observable effects on this type of confidence by the tested counselor variables of teaching experience, years of school counseling practice, gender and self reported training in ASCA National Standards. This finding is contrary to previous studies, which tended to find a positive correlation between higher self efficacy about work and more teaching experience, more years of school counseling practice, gender and training in ASCA National Standards (Bodenhorn & Skaggs, 2005). Th e sources of self efficacy are held to be a) mastery of relevant skills, b) vicarious experiences or modeling, c) social persuasions, and d) emotional reactions related to a task (Bandura, 1977, 1986, 1995). Although two sources of self efficacy were test ed implicitly in this study, work experience in teaching and counseling (mastery) and training in ASCA National Standards (modeling), there was no statistically significant correlation between school counselor self efficacy about work and the tested
99 counse lor variables. The lack of correlation between school counselor self efficacy about work and the tested counselor variables may be due to the small sample size or the differences that exist between the sampled groups of previous studies. Perhaps the sour ces of confidence about school counseling practice, within the context of urban, underperforming schools, are beyond the four determinants of self efficacy are held by Bandura. Sources of self efficacy for urban counselors may be impacted more by the exte rnal and institutional factors that are known to adversely impact urban schools such community (Crowder & South, 2003; Lee, 2005), and higher than average counselor to stude nt ratios (College Board, 2008a). efficacy to engage African American male students and a) counselor level characteristics and b) school level characteristics. Interestingly, thr ee effects among counselor level variables were observed to significantly associate with the sense of efficacy to engage African American male students. Male counselors were significantly associated with a sense of efficacy to engage African American male students. The few male counselors that commit to working under the conditions of the sampled schools reported feeling more confident about engaging the young men at their schools. This finding suggests that the male counselors may have some awareness th at, as school leaders and male role models, they may impact marginalized, adolescent males s for teachers (Bandura, 1986; Ross, 1998), when they are less conscious of the
100 complexities and challenges that are inherent in education. Contrary to teachers, school counselor self efficacy has been shown to be highest after approximately three years f or school counselors (Bodenhorn & Skaggs, 2005) as they build upon their training and professional competencies. In this study, the number of years of counseling for counselors who did not report receiving training in ASCA National standards was negativel y associated with their sense of efficacy to engage African American male students. The more veteran counselors who did not indicate receiving training in the implementation of ASCA National Standards tended to report feeling less efficacy in their abilit y to interact with African American male students in ways that Consistent with previous findings related to counselor self efficacy and counselors who report that they have trained with the ASCA standards (Boden horn & Skaggs, 2005), veteran school counselors in the current study who reported receiving training in the standards were positively associated with feeling a sense of efficacy to engage African American male students. Given how self efficacy is thought to develop reported that they received ASCA standards training also report that they feel more confident about engaging students than their counterparts who may not have rece ived the training. Furthermore, the findings of this study suggest that training in the implementation of ASCA National Standards may positively impact how confidently veteran counselors feel about engaging African American male students within the contex t of urban, underperforming high schools.
101 The third and fourth hypotheses addressed the relationships between self efficacy beliefs and the 2009 high school graduation rates for males. There were no statistically significant relationships found between either of the types of efficacy (about work and to engage African American male students) and the 2009 rate of graduation for males. Of practical significance is that more of an effect was observed with the sense of efficacy to engage African American mal e students (outcome expectancy) than their self efficacy about work (efficacy expectations), related to the rate of graduation for males (see Tables 4 4, 4 5, Chapter 4). a university partnership program. Although there was little variation in graduation rates between the partner and non partner schools, the partnership schools experienced slightly higher rates of graduation for males (see Table 4 6). There may be advan tages with the services and collaboration that university partnerships provide that can account for the slightly higher rates of graduation for males at the partner schools. This finding holds practical significance related to how university partnerships with urban schools can be a resource for improving school counselor self efficacy and high school graduation rates. S ignificant relationships between school counselor self efficacy beliefs and the rate of graduation for male students were not found. Howev er, it is important to note that multiple factors are attributed to student outcomes in education. Factors at levels such as student, classroom, school, family, and community contribute to student, counselor, and school outcomes. Missing from this study were data such as the demographic makeup of the counselors, the rigor of curriculum for each school, the
102 various pathways to high school completion, the degree of parental/caregiver engagement, the degree and quality of other stakeholder partnerships, the quality of training received with ASCA National Standards, and school climate assessment. Limitations While the resultant descriptive data about school counselor characteristics is consistent with previous studies on school counselor self efficacy, there a re limitations related to the generalizability of the findings. Data on the age and ethnic backgrounds of the participants were not measured in this study, limiting the ability to generalize the findings to the entire population of school counselors. Add itionally, self reported data may be influenced by social desirability bias, with participants responding in ways that may or may not reflect their true attitudes (Ferrari, Bristow & Cowman, 2005). The sample size for this study was limited due to structur al restraints and posed threats to power and the estimates that were yielded by HLM analyses. The number of urban, predominantly African American, underperforming schools, within the four urban districts was only 18 and one district was removed from the g roup due to ethical considerations of anonymity. In order to address the limitation related to the small sample size, an intraclass correlation coefficient was calculated to determine the amount of variance that existed between schools for the SCE and EAM E outcomes (Raudenbush & Bryk, 2002). It was determined that enough variance existed between the schools to warrant the use of HLM. The resultant intraclass correlation coefficient for each of the SCE and EAME outcomes were more than is generally recomme nded for this type of study (Hedges & Hedberg, 2007).
103 Implications for Theory A theoretical implication was raised in this study when more of an effect was expectancy) than was seen with their efficacy about their work (efficacy expectations), in relation to the 2009 graduation rates for males. Based on this study, outcome expectancy may have more predictive power than believed previously. Counselors in low performing high schools may feel more capable about the outcomes of their relationship building and student engagement with African American males than they do about the outcomes of the official duties that are expected of them as professional school counselors. Further investigations would be needed to test this theoretical line of inquiry. Implications for Practice Male underachievement across all races and income levels continues to be a problem in public schools (Clark, Lee, Goodman & Yacco, 2008). Part of the chall enge has been that there is a dearth of role models in schools, as school counseling and teaching are female dominated professions. Thus, the findings related to the positive association between male counselors and their sense of efficacy to engage Africa n American male students have practical implications for school counseling. Although it is necessary to have school counselors who are competent and confident about their work and the outcomes of their work, more professional development is needed to help build engaging. This study is an early indication that school counselors may need to tap into the resources that are available through the male role models and change age nts within
104 school counselors need to focus on the relationship building and cultural skills that have been shown to positively impact the outcomes of adolescent African A merican males that come to school from high risk backgrounds (Lee, 2005; Lynn et al., 2010). The overall high level of efficacy that the counselors reported has implications for the ways in which school counselor self efficacy is developed within the conte xt of urban, underperforming schools. Within this context, their self efficacy may not be as a result of their experience as teachers, years of school counseling practice, gender, or training in ASCA National Standards as indicated in previous studies (Bo denhorn & Skaggs, 2005). School counselors that serve in high needs communities may find themselves taking on extra roles that are not necessarily recognized by national professional organizations and standards. More can be learned from counselors that p ersist in high needs schools as they demonstrate high levels of school counselor self efficacy despite the disproportionate challenges that are encountered in high risk settings. An implication for practice is the relationship that was found among counselo sense of efficacy to engage African American male students, the number of years of counseling and training in the implementation of ASCA National Standards. Veteran counselors were found to have lower efficacy to engage students, while veteran counsel ors who reported receiving training in the ASCA National Standards were positively associated with the sense of efficacy to engage African American male students. This study lends support for the use of professional development in the implementation of AS career. Current students are more likely to be familiar with the standards and may enter
105 their new profession with a higher sense of efficacy to engage students (Bandura, 1986) through the imple mentation of ASCA standards. However, there may still be benefits to receiving continuing education and updates on the utilization of ASCA standards in mid career and end of career school counseling practice, as veteran counselors were observed to not hav e a high sense of efficacy regarding the engagement of a population of students that are in critical need of school counseling services. Another implication for practice is related to the difference observed when controlling for graduation rates for males and the university partnership status of the schools. Graduation rates for partnership schools were slightly higher than non partner schools, which may suggest that underperforming high schools benefit from the services and collaboration that is afforded by higher education institutions. Further investigations into the degree and quality of partnerships that occur between the university and schools would yield more useful data than can be gathered with simple group mean statistics. Recommendations for Fu ture Research This study was exploratory in nature as no previous studies were found that investigated the relationship between school counselor self efficacy and school level outcomes. Further studies are needed that examine the impact that the work of s chool counselors may have on high stakes indicators of achievement. This would be particularly useful in light of the crisis of male underachievement that is experienced in urban, predominantly African American, underperforming high schools (NCES, 2010). Future studies are recommended that investigate female achievement at urban schools in comparison to what is happening with the males within the same setting.
106 The high level of school counselor self efficacy found among the sampled schools begs for furthe r investigations about the sources of self efficacy despite the challenging situations that are often reported at urban schools (Lee, 2005). In other words, are there patterns of personal characteristics among urban school counselors that keep them commit ted despite adverse circumstances that are associated with underperforming high schools? Hierarchical linear modeling is argued to be a step in preparation for deeper qualitative inquiries due to the ability of HLM analyses to detect the contribution of v ariance from multiple levels of data (Raudenbush & Bryk, 2002; Singer, 1998). However, further qualitative studies are needed to yield richer information about the sources of school counselor self efficacy in urban, underperforming schools. Moreover, the use of qualitative methods to elicit feedback from male counselors about their practices with African American male students may provide insight into sources of student and school counselor self efficacy at urban schools. For the purposes of this study, t wo different scales were used in order to measure efficacy about their work and their sense of efficacy to engage African American male students. However, the school counselor self efficacy scale was a global measure of perceived e fficacy while the sense of efficacy to engage African American male students was more specific and narrow in its measurement. The use of scales from two different contexts (school counseling and traditional teaching) and levels of specificity posed threat s to measures of construct validity. Although, the scales each demonstrated high reliability, it is recommended that an instrument be
107 definition of self efficacy within th e context of school counseling. Also, such an instrument could better capture the collaborative nature of school counseling work (McCoach & Colbert, 2010). Further research is needed with larger sample sizes in order to improve the effect size and power. It is recommended that ethnic background and career stage variables be added in future studies with counselors who serve in higher performing schools. be useful if exam ining group mean differences among counselors. Conclusion The documented underachievement of males in urban centers has prompted stakeholders to find ways to improve the educational experiences of male students and increase their rate of high school comple tion (AEE, 2008; Schott, 2010). School counselors are critical stakeholders in urban, underperforming schools as the families and students from such schools rely heavily on school resources to prepare for life beyond high school (McDonough, 2004). Furthe rmore, school counselors are expected to link the results of their work to student success and school improvement (ASCA, 2005). This study is the first known attempt to demonstrate that school counselor self efficacy may be linked to student and school out comes at urban, underperforming high that were detected for school variables tested, significant effects were found for the ficacy to engage African American male students and gender, years of teaching, and training in the implementation of ASCA National Standards.
108 The dearth of male educators and school counselors may very well be leaving its mark on urban schools where as f ew as 50% of males are crossing the finish line out of high school within four years of entry. Male counselors were positively associated with a sense of efficacy to engage African American male students. This significant finding supports the need to sol icit more male role models from within the surrounding communities into high needs schools, as well into the school counseling profession. Although further investigations are needed to determine to what degree does school effica cy equate to positive student outcomes, male counselors with demonstrable, higher levels of efficacy should be encouraged to share their best practices in engaging African American male students at urban schools. An early indication from this study is tha t training in the implementation of ASCA experience with ASCA training improved school co unselor self efficacy and the perception of achievement gap and equity issues (Bodenhorn & Skaggs, 2005; Bodenhorn et al., 2010). However, this study differed in that significant effects were observed for veteran counselors who reported receiving training in the ASCA National Standards. Veteran counselors that did not report receiving training in ASCA standards were negatively associated with the sense of efficacy to engage African American male students. This study presented practical implications for the use of ASCA National Standards in order to improve how counselors engage with African American males and possibly affect the rate of high school graduation for this group of males within
109 underperforming school contexts. The American School Counselor A ssociation developed standards that are appropriate for counselors at all career levels and varied school settings. Adherence to ASCA National Standards and continuing education that includes training in the implementation of the standards may yield posit ive results in working with African American males at high needs school and eventually realize increased educational gains for this population of adolescents.
110 APPENDIX A PERMISSION FOR INSTR UMENTS From: "Bodenhorn, Nancy" email@example.com To: 'Sophie Maxis' firstname.lastname@example.org Date: Sat Mar 20 11:04:22 EDT 2010 Subject: RE: SCSE Scale Hi Sophie, I am excited about the prospect of people using the SCSE sca le for research, and certainly give permission for you to use the scale. I have attached a version of the scale for your use. You mentioned in your phone message that you had some additional questions. It might be easiest if you can send the questions by email. I will not be in my office on Monday, and am busy on Tuesday morning. I could probably talk on the phone on Tuesday afternoon, if that will work for you, call me on my cell phone number. Say hi to Mary Ann for me! Nancy Bodenhorn Associate Pro fessor Counselor Education Virginia Tech ----Original Message ----From: Sophie Maxis [ mailto:email@example.com] Sent: Friday, March 19, 2010 2:42 PM To: Bodenhorn, Nancy Subject: SCSE Scale Dear Dr. Bodenhorn, My name is Sophie Maxis and I am a doctoral candidate in counselor education at University of Florida. I currently work with a university school partnership that serves urban, high poverty, low performing high schools. I'm intereste d in possibly using your SCSE instrument for my dissertation within the context of these types of schools. My interest in the SCSE scale was further peaked upon reading your recent article in PSC about the achievement gap and equity. I would like your per mission to use the instrument and have left a voice message regarding this on your office line. Thank you, Sophie Maxis -
112 APPENDIX B S CHOOL COUNSELOR SELF EFFICACY SCALE Below is a list of activities representing many school counselor responsib ilities. Indicate your confidence in your current ability to perform each activity by circling the appropriate answer next to each item according to the scale defined below. Please answer each item based on one current school, and based on how you feel no w, not on your anticipated (or previous) ability or school(s). Remember, this is not a test and there are no right answers. Use the following scale: 1 = not confident, 2 = slightly confident, 3 = moderately confident, 4 = generally confi dent 5 = highly confident. Please circle the number that best represents your response for each item. 1. Advocate for integration of student academic, career, and personal development into the mission of my school. 1 2 3 4 5 2 Recognize situations that impact (both negatively and positively) student learning and achievement. 1 2 3 4 5 3. Analyze data to identify patterns of achievement and behavior that contribute to school success 1 2 3 4 5 4. Advocate for myself as a professional school counselor and articulate the purposes and goals of school counseling. 1 2 3 4 5 5. Develop measurable outcomes for a school counseling program which would demonstrate accountab ility. 1 2 3 4 5 6. Consult and collaborate with teachers, staff, administrators and parents to promote student success. 1 2 3 4 5 7. Establish rapport with a student for individual counseling. 1 2 3 4 5 8. Function successfully as a small group leader. 1 2 3 4 5 9. Effectively deliver suitable parts of the school counseling program through large group meetings such as in classrooms. 1 2 3 4 5 1 0. Conduct interventions with parents, guardians and families in order to 1 2 3 4 5 11. Teach students how to apply time and task management skills. 1 2 3 4 5 12. Foster understanding of the relationship between learning and work. 1 2 3 4 5 13. Offer appropriate explanations to students, parents and teachers of how learning styles affect school performance. 1 2 3 4 5 14. Deliver age appropriate programs through which students acquire the skills needed to investigate the world of work. 1 2 3 4 5 15. Implement a program which enables all students to make informed career decisions. 1 2 3 4 5 16. Teach students to apply problem solving skills toward their academic, personal and career success. 1 2 3 4 5 17. Evaluate commercially prepared material designed for school counseling to establish t heir relevance to my school population. 1 2 3 4 5
113 1 = not confident 2 = slightly confident 3 = moderately confident 4 = generally confident 5 = highly confident 18. Model and teach conflict resolution skills. 1 2 3 4 5 19. Ensure a safe environment for all students in my school. 1 2 3 4 5 20. Change situations in which an individual or group treats others in a disrespectful or harassing manner. 1 2 3 4 5 21. Teach students to use effective communication skills with peers, faculty, employers, family, etc. 1 2 3 4 5 22. Follow ethical and legal obligations designed for school counselors. 1 2 3 4 5 23. Guide students in te chniques to cope with peer pressure. 1 2 3 4 5 24. Adjust my communication style appropriately to the age and developmental levels of various students. 1 2 3 4 5 establishing and conducting the school counseling program. 1 2 3 4 5 26. I can find some way of connecting and communicating with any student in my school. 1 2 3 4 5 coping mechanisms for dealing with crises in their lives 1 2 3 4 5 28. Counsel effectively with students and families from different social/economic statuses. 1 2 3 4 5 29. Understand the viewpoints and experiences of students and parents who are from a different cultural background than myself. 1 2 3 4 5 30. Help teachers improve their effectiveness with students. 1 2 3 4 5 31. Discuss issues of sexuality and sexual orientation in an age appropriate manner with students. 1 2 3 4 5 32. Speak in front of large groups such as faculty or parent meetings. 1 2 3 4 5 33. Use tec hnology designed to support student successes and progress through the educational process. 1 2 3 4 5 34. Communicate in writing with staff, parents, and the external community. 1 2 3 4 5 35. Help students identi fy and attain attitudes, behaviors, and skills which lead to successful learning. 1 2 3 4 5 36. Select and implement applicable strategies to assess school wide issues. 1 2 3 4 5 37. Promote the use of counseling and guidance activities by the total school community to enhance a positive school climate. 1 2 3 4 5 38. Develop school improvement plans based on interpreting school wide assessment results. 1 2 3 4 5 39. I dentify aptitude, achievement, interest, values, and personality appraisal resources appropriate for specified situations and populations. 1 2 3 4 5 40. Implement a preventive approach to student problems. 1 2 3 4 5 41. Lead school wide initiatives which focus on ensuring a positive learning environment. 1 2 3 4 5 42. Consult with external community agencies which provide support services for our students. 1 2 3 4 5 43. Provide resources and guidance to school population in times of crisis. 1 2 3 4 5
114 APPENDIX C E FFICACY IN STUDENT E NGAGEMENT This part of the survey is designed to help us gain a better understanding of the kinds of things tha t create challenges for school counselors. Consider the combination of your current ability, resources, and opportunity to do each of the following in your present position. How much can you do? Please indicate your opinion about each of the stateme nts below as you work with the general student body at your school Not at all Very Little Some Degree Quite A Bit A Great Deal 1. How much can you do to motivate students who show low interest in school work? 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 2. How much can you d o to get students to believe they can do well in school work? 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 3. How much can you do to help your students value learning? 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 4. How much can you assist families in helping their children do well in school? 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Please indicate your opinion about each of the statements below as you work with African American/Black males at your school 5 How much can you do to motivate African American/Black males who show low interest in school work? 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 6 How much can you do to get African American/Black males to believe they can do well in school work? 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 7 How much can you do to help African American/Black males value learning? 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 8 How much can you assist families in helping their African American/Black males do well in school? 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Demographic Data 1. Gender Female Male 2. Number of years employed as a teacher: _____ 3. Number of years employed as a school counselor: _____ 4. I have rece ived training in implementing the ASCA National Standards. Y es N o
115 LIST OF REFERENCES Adelabu, D. H. (2007). Time perspective and school membership as correlates to academic achievement among African American adolescents. Adolescence 42(167), 525 538. Akos, P. & Galassi, J. P. (2004). Gender and race as variables in psychosocial adjustment to middle and high school. The Journal of Educational Research 98(2), 102 108. Alliance for Excellent Education. (2009). High school dropouts in America, Retri eved on August 5, 2010 from http://www.all4ed.org/publication_material/issue_policy_briefs Alliance for Excellent Education. (2009). Understanding high school graduation rat es in Florida, retrieved on June 7, 2010 from http://www.all4ed.org Alliance for Excellent Education. (2008). African American students and U.S. high schools, retrieved on June 7, 2010 from http://www.all4ed.org Amatea, E., & West Olatunji, C. (2007). Joining the conversation about education our poorest children: Emerging leadership roles for school counselors in high poverty schools. Professional School Counseling 11, 81 89. American School Counselor Association. (2005). The ASCA national model: A framework for school counseling programs (2 nd ed.). Alexandria, VA: Author. American School Counselor Association. (2010). Position statements, Alexandria, VA: Author. Retrie ved on June 15 2010 from http ://www.schoolcounselor.org/content.asp?pl=325&sl=127&contentid=178 Arnold, C. (1992). An introduction to hierarchical linear models. Measurement and Evaluation in Counselling and Development 25(2), 58. Ashton, P. (1984). T eacher efficacy: A motivational paradigm for effective teacher education. Journal of Teacher Education 35(5), 28 32. Ashton, P.T. & Webb, R. B. (1986). efficacy and student achievement White Plains, NY: Lo ngman. The condition of education 2010 (NCES 2010 028). National Center for Education Statistics, Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education. Washingt on, DC. Retrieved June 7, 2010, from http://nces.ed.gov/pubsearch/pubsinfo.asp?pubid=2010028
116 commitment : Correlates and predictors. Professional School Counseling 9(3), 197 205. Balfanz, R. & Herzog, L. (2006, May). Keeping middle grades students on track to graduation: Initial analysis and implications. PowerPoint presentation. Philadelphia, PA: Philade lphia Education Fund and Johns Hopkins University with support from the William Penn Foundation. Balfanz, R. and Legters, N. (2004). Locating the dropout crisis Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Center for Social Organization of Schools. Bandura, A. (1995). Exercise of personal and collective efficacy in changing societies. In A. Bandura (Ed.), Self efficacy in changing societies (pp.1 45). New York: Cambridge University Press. Bandura, A. (1993). Perceived self efficacy in cognitive development a nd functioning. Educational Psychologist 28(2), 117 148. Bandura, A. (1977). Self efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review 84(2), 191 215. Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thoughts and action: A social co gnitive theory Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall. Barth, P., Haycock, K., Jackson, H., Mora, K., Ruiz, P., Robinson, S., & Wilkins, A. (Eds). (1999). Dispelling the myth: High poverty schools exceeding expectations Washington, DC: Education Trust. Barton, P.E. (2003). Parsing the achievement gap Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service. Bemak, F. & Chung, R. C. (2005). Advocacy as a critical role for urban school counselors: Working toward equity and social justice. Professional School Cou nseling 8(3), 196 202. Bemak, F., Chung, R., & Siroskey Sabdo, L. A. (2005). Empowerment groups for academic success: An innovative approach to prevent high school failure for at risk, urban African students. Professional School Counseling 8(5), 377 38 9. Black, S. (2004). The pivotal year American School Board Journal: Alexandria, VA: National School Boards Association. Bodenhorn, N. & Skaggs, G. (2005). Development of the school counselor self efficacy scale Measurement and Evaluation in Cou nseling and Development, 38, 14 28.
117 Bodenhorn, N., Wolfe, E. W. & Airen, O. E. (2010). School counselor program choice and self efficacy: Relationship to achievement gap and equity Professional School Counseling 13, 165 174. Bowman, L. (2005). Grade re tention: Is it a help or hindrance to student academic success? Preventing School Failure 49(3), 42 46. Bridgeland, J. M., DiIulio, J. J. & Morison, K. B. (2006). The silent epidemic: Perspectives of high school dropouts. Washington, DC: Civic Enterpr ises. Bryan, J., & Holcomb McCoy, C. (200 7 ). An examination of school counselor involvement in school family communi ty partnerships. Professional School Counseling, 10(5), 441 454 Caraway, K., Tucker, C., Reinke, W. M., & Hall, C. (2003). S elf efficacy goal orientation, and fear of failure as predictors of school engagement. Psychology in the Schools 40 (4) 417 427. Catterall, J. S. (1998). Risk and resilience in student transitions to high school. American Journal of Education 106, 302. 333. Th e Center for Public Education (2006). Key lessons: High performing, high poverty schools (2006). Fairfax, VA: Author Clark, M. A. & Breman, J.C. (2009). School counselor inclusion: A collaborative model to provide academic and social emotional support in the classroom setting. Journal of Counseling and Development 87(1), 6 11. Clark, M. A., Lee, S., Goodman, W. & Yacco, S. (2008). Examining male underachievement in public education: Action research at a district level. NASSP Bulletin 92(2), 111 132 The College Board (2010). The educational crisis facing young men of color Washington, DC: Author. The College Board (2008a). Coming to our senses: Education and the American future New York: Author. The College Board (2008 b ). Inspiration and i nnovation: Ten effective counseling practices from the College Board's Inspiration Award Schools. Retrieved on June 7, 2010 http://professionals.collegeboard.com/ profdownload/ inspiration_innovation_ booklet.PDF Cooper, R. & Liou, D.D. (2007). The structure and climate of information pathways: Rethinking opportunity to learn in urban high schools during the ninth grade transition. The High School Journal, 91 (1), 43 56.
118 Council for Accreditation of Counseling and Related Educational Programs. (2009). 2009 standards Alexandria, VA: Author. Creswell, J. (2008). Educational research : Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research (3rd ed.). Upper Saddle River, N.J.: Pearson/Merrill Prentice Hall. Crowder, K. & South, S.J., (2003). Neighborhood Distress and School Dropout: The Variable Significance of Community Context. Social Science Research 32, 659 698. Darling Hammond, L. (1998) Alternatives to grade retention. The School Administrator 55(7), 8 21. Darling Hammond, L. & Friedlaender, D. (2008). Creating excellent and equitable schools. Educational Leadership 65(8), 14 21. Davis, J. E., & Jordan, W. J. (1994). The effects of school context, structure, and experience on African American males in middle and high school. Journal of Negro Education 63 (4) 570 587. Dynarski, M. & Gleason, P. (2002). How can we help? What we have learned from recent federal dropout prevention programs. Journal of Education for Students Placed At Risk 7(1), 43 69. Education Commission on the States. (2010). Equipping education leaders, advancing ideas. Retrieved on June 7, 2010 from http://www.ecs.org Epstein, J. L. (2001). School, family, and community partnerships: Preparing educators and improving schools (pp. 38 74). Boulder, CO: Westview Press. The Education Trust. (2009). The Education Trust. (2010). Retrieved June11, 2010, from http://www.edtrust.org/west/press room/press release/crisis in californias chronically underperforming schools continues Chi, L., Goforth, J., Cairns, B., et al. (2004). E xploring Risk in Early Adolescent African American Youth. American Journal of Community Psychology 33, 51 60. Ferrari, J.R., Bristow, M., &Cowman, S. (2005). Looking good or being good? The role of social desirability tendencies in student perceptions of institutional mission and values. College Student Journal, 39, 7 13
119 Florida Department of Education. (2009), retrieved http://www.fldoe.org/eias/eiaspubs/default.asp Goddard, R. D., (20 01). Collective efficacy: A neglected construct in the study of schools and student achievement. Journal of Educational Psychology 93, 467 476. Goddard, R. D., Hoy, W. K., and Hoy, A. W. (2000). Collective teacher efficacy: Its meaning, measure, and im pact on student achievement. American Educational Research Journal 37(2), 479 507. Gysbers, N.C. & Henderson, P. (1994). Developing and managing your school guidance program (2 nd ed.). Alexandria, VA: American Counseling Association. Hammond, C., Linto n, D., Smink, J., & Drew, S. (2007). Dropout Risk Factors and Exemplary Programs. Clemson, SC: National Dropout Prevention Center, Communities In Schools, Inc. Harlow, C. W. (2003). Education and correctional populations Bureau of Justice Statistics Special Report. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice. Heckman, J. J. & LaFontaine P. A. (2010). The American high school graduation rate: Trends and levels. The Review of Economics and Statistics 92(2), 244 262. Hedges, L. V. & Hedberg, E. C. ( 2007). Intraclass correlation values for planning group randomized trials in education. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis 29(1), 60 87. Herr, E. L. & Erford, B. T. (2011). Historical roots and future issues. In B. T. Erford (Ed.), Transfor ming the School Counseling Profession (3 rd ed., pp. 19 43). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson. Hertzog, C.J. & Morgan, P. L. (1999). Transi tion: A process, not an event. Reston, VA: National Association of Secondary School Principals Holcomb McCoy, C. ( 2004). Assessing the multicultural competence of school counselors: A checklist. Professional School Counseling, 7(3),178 186. Holcomb McCoy, C. (2007). Transitioning to high school: Issues and challenges for African American students. Professional Scho ol Counseling 10(3), 253 260. Holcomb multicultural self efficacy: A preliminary investigation. Professional School Counseling 11(3), 166 178.
120 Hoffman, R. (2008). Degree of implementation of the Idaho Comprehensive School Counseling Program model and its relationship to high school graduation rates (Doctoral dissertation from University of Phoenix, 2008). Retrieved September 23, 2010, from ProQuest Dissertations database. UMI No. 3388306. Hoy, W. K., Tarter, J. & Bliss, J. R. (1990). Organizational climate, school health, and effectiveness: A comparative analysis. Educational Administration Quarterly 26(3), 260 279. American School Board Journal Special Report. Retrieved May 10, 2010, from http://www.asbj.com/specialreports/0406SpecialReports/S4.html Jimerson, S.R. (2001). Meta analysis of gra de retention research: Implications for practice in the twenty first century. School Psychology Review 30(3), 420 437. Jimerson, S.R., Pletcher, S.W., Graydon, K., Schnurr, B.L., Nickerson, A.B. & Kundert, D.K. (2006). Beyond grade retention and socia l promotion: Promoting the social and academic competence of students. Psychology in the Schools 43(1), 85 97. Kannapel, P. & Clements, S.K. (2005). Inside the black box of high performing high poverty schools Lexington, KY: Prichard Committee for Aca demic Excellence. K ennelly, L., & Monrad, M. (2007 a ). Approaches to dropout prevention: Heeding early warning signs with appropriate interventions Washington, DC: National High School Center. K ennelly, L., & Monrad, M. (2007 b ). Easing the transition to high school: Research and best practices designed to support high school learning Washington, DC: National High School Center. Kentucky Department of Education. Instructional equity: Closing the achievement gap (2010, May 10). Retrieved May 10, 2010 from http://www.education.ky.gov/KDE/Instructional+Resources/Closing+the+Gap/ King, J. E. (1996). The Decision to Go to College: Attitudes and Experiences Associa ted with College Attendance Among Low Income Students Washington, DC: The College Board. Krumboltz, J. D. (1979). A social learning theory of career decision making. Revised and reprinted in A. M. Mitchell, G. B. Jones, & J. D. Krumboltz (Eds.), Social learning and career decision making (pp. 19 49). Cranston, RI: Carroll Press.
121 Lapan, R. T., Gysbers, N. C., & Petroski, G. F. (2003). Helping seventh graders be safe and successful: A statewide study of the impact of comprehensive guidance and counseli ng programs. Professional School Counseling 6, 186 197. Lapan, R. T ., Gysbers, N. C. & Sun, Y. (1997). The impact of more fully implemented guidance programs on the school experiences of high school students: A statewide evaluation study. Journal of Co unseling and Development 75, 292 302 Leckrone, M.J., & Griffith, B.G. (2006). Retention realities and educational standards. Children and Schools 28(1), 53 58. Lee, C. C. (2001). Culturally responsive school counselors and programs: Addressing the needs of all students. Professional School Counseling 4(4), 257 261 Lee, C. C. (2005). Urban school counseling: Context, characteristics, and competencies. Professional School Counseling 8(3), 184 188. Lee, J. & Shute, V. (2010). Personal and social contextual factors in K 12 academic performance: An integrative perspective on student learning. Educational Psychologist 45(3), 185 202. Long, J. F., Monoi, S., Harper, B., Knoblauch, D., & Murphy, P. K. (2007). Academic motivation and achievement am ong urban adolescents. Urban Education 42(3), 196 222 Lynn, M., Bacon, J. N., Totten, T. L., Bridges, T. L. & Jennings, M. (2010). Examining performing high school in an African American sc hool district. Teachers College Record 112(1), 289 330. Martinez, M. & Klopott, S. (2003). Improving college access for minority, low income, and first generation students Boston, MA: Pathways to College Network. McCallumore, K. M. & Sparapani, E. F. (2010). The importance of the ninth grade on high school graduation rates and student success in high school. Education 130(3), 447 456. McCoach, D. B. & Colbert, R. D. (2010). Factors underlying the collective teacher efficacy scale and their mediati ng role in the effect of socioeconomic status on academic achievement at the school level. Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development 43(1), 31 47. McDonough, P. M. (2004). The School to College transition: Challenges and prospects Washin gton, DC: American Council on Education.
122 high poverty high performing schools. Journal of Education for Students Placed at Risk 9(2), 97 125. Metropolitan Center for Ur ban Education. (2009). The New York City High Schools contributing the most to the achievement of Black and Latino males New York, NY: Author. Militello, M., Carey, J., Dimmitt, C., Lee, V. & Schweid, J. (2009). Identifying exemplary school counseling practices in nationally recognized high schools. Journal of School Counseling 7(13), 1 26. Murdock, T. B. (1999). The social context of risk: Status and motivational predictors of alienation in middle school. Journal of Educational Psychology 91(1), 62 75. Myrick, R.D. (2003 ). Developmental guidance and counseling: A practical approach (3rd ed.). Minneapolis, MN: Educational Media Corporation. National Association of School Psychologists. (2003). Position statement on the student grade retention an d social promotion Bethesda, MD: Author. National Association of Secondary School Principals. (2006). Breaking the Ranks in the Middle: Strategies for Leading Middle Level Reform. Reston, VA: Author. National Center for Educational Statistics (2006). T he Condition of Education 2006: Indicator 25 Grade Retention (NCES 2006 071) Retrieved June 29, 2010, from http://nces.ed.gov/programs/coe/2006/section3/indicator25.asp Nati onal Center for Education Statistics (2009). Percentage of high school dropouts among persons 16 through 24 years old (status dropout rate), by sex and race/ethnicity: Selected years, 1960 through 2008 Retrieved May 10, 2010, from http://nces.ed.gov/programs/digest/d09/tables/dt09_108.asp National Center for Education Statistics (2010). Public school graduates and dropouts from the common core of data: School year 2007 08 (NCES 2010 341) National Center for Education Statistics, Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education. Washington, DC. Retrieved July 21, 2010 from http://nces.ed.gov/pub search/pubsinfo.asp?pubid=2010341 National College Access Network (2010). Retrieved October 26, 2010 from http://www.collegeaccess.org. Nebbitt, V. E., Lombe, M., LaPoint, V., & Bryant, D. (2009). Predictors and correlates of academic performance am ong urban African American adolescents. The Journal of Negro Education 78(1), 29 41.
123 Neild, R. C., Stoner Eby, S. & Furstenberg, F. (2001). Connecting entrance and departure: The transition to ninth grade and high school dropout Presented at Harvard Civil Rights Project Conference on Dropouts in America, Harva rd University, January 13, 2001 Noguera, P.A. (2003). The trouble with black males: The role and i nfluence of environmental and cultural factors on the academic performance of African America n males. Urban Education 38 (4), 431 459. Pajares (2002). Overview of social cognitive theory and of self efficacy Retreived October 12, 2009 from http://www.emory.edu/EDUCATION/mfp/eff.html Pajares, F. (1996). Self efficacy beliefs in academic setti ngs. Review of Educational Research 66(4), 543 578. Pajares, F., & Valiante, G. (1997). Influence of self writing. The Journal of Educational Research 90, 353 360. Paterson, L. & Goldstein, H. (1991). New statistical methods for analyzing social structures: An introduction to multilevel models. British Educational Research Journal, 17 (4 ), 387 393. Philadelphia Education Fund (2006). The Philadelphia Educational Longitudinal Study Philadelphia: Author. Raude nbush, S.W. & Bryk, A.S. (2002). Hierarchical Linear Models ( 2 nd ed. ). Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications. Reyes, O., Gillock, K.L., Kobus, K. & Sanchez, B. (2000). A longitudinal examination of the transition into senior high school for adolescents from urban, low income status, and predominately minority backgrounds. American Journal of Community Psychology 28(4), 519 544. Riordan, C. (1998). Gender gap trends in public secondary schools: 1 9 72 to 1992 East Lansing, MI: National Center for Research o n Teacher Learning. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED434171) experiences and school outcomes among African American male adolescents in Chicago. Urban Education, 38 (5), 53 8 607. Roderick, M., & Camburn, E. (1999). Risk and recovery from course failure in the early years of high school. American Educational Research Journal, 36 (2), 303 344.
124 Rodney, L.W., Crafter, B., Rodney, H.E., & Mupier, R.M. (1999). Variables co ntributing to grade retention among African American adolescent males. Journal of Educational Research 92(3), 185 190. Ross, J. A. (1998). The antecedents and consequences of teacher efficacy. Advances in Research on Teaching, 7, 49 73. Rouse, C. E. (2 005). Labor market consequences of an inadequate education Paper presented for the symposium on the Social Costs of Inadequate Education, Teachers College Columbia University, October 2005. Sampson, R. J., Raudenbush, S. W., & Earls, F. (1997). Neighbor hood and violent crime: A multilevel study of collective efficacy. Science 277 (5328), 918 924. The Schott Foundation for Public Education. (2009). Lost opportunity: A 50 state report on the opportunity to learn in America A national report retrieved on June 15, 2010 from http://www.otlstatereport.org The Schott Foundation for Public Education. (20 10 ). Yes We Can: The 2010 Schott 50 State Report on Black Males in Public Education :Florida A national re port retrieved on August 24, 2010 from h ttp://www.blackboysreport.org/?report=state&page_id=292 Schunk, D. H. (1989). Self efficacy and achievement behaviors. Educational Psychology Review 1, 173 207. Shell, D. F., Murphy, C. C., & Bruning, R. H. (198 9). Self efficacy and outcome expectancy mechanisms in reading and writing achievement. Journal of Educational Psychology 81, 91 100. Singer, J. D. (1998). Using SAS PROC MIXED to fit multilevel models, hierarchical models, and individual growth models Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics 23(4), 323 355. S mith, J. S. Akos, R ., Lim, S. & Wiley, S (2008) Student and stakeholder perceptions of the transition to high school. The High School Journal, 91 (3), 32 42. Southern Regional Edu cation Board. (2002). Opening doors to the future: Preparing low achieving middle grades students to succeed in high school Atlanta, GA: Author. Stewart, E. (2007). Individual and school structural effects on African American high emic achievement. The High School Journal 91(2), 16 34. Stone, C. B., & Dahir, C. A. (2011). School counselor accountability: A MEASURE of student success (3 rd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson.
125 Suh, S. & Suh, J. (2007). Risk factors and levels of r isk for high school dropouts. Professional School Counseling 10(3), 297 306. Sutton, J.M. & Fall, M. (1995). The relationship of school climate factors to counselor self efficacy Journal of Counseling Psychology, 34, 414 424. Tschannen Moran, M., & Barr, M. (2004). Fostering student learning: The relationship of collective teacher efficacy and student achievement. Leadership and Policy in Schools 3(3), 189 209. Tschannen Moran, M ., & Woolfolk Hoy, A. (2001). Teacher efficacy: Capturing an elusive construct. Teacher and Teacher Education 17, 783 805. Tschannen Moran, M ., & Woolfolk Hoy, A. (2007). The differential antecedents of self efficacy beliefs of novice and experienced teachers. Teacher and Teacher Education 23, 944 956. Tschannen Moran M ., Woolfolk Hoy, A. & Hoy, W.K. (1998). Teacher efficacy: Its meaning and measure. Review of Educational Review 68, 202 248. U.S. Census Bureau. (2000). 2000 Census of population, Public Law 94 171 redistricting data file. Retrieved on May 10, 2010 from http://quickfacts.census.gov/qfd/meta/long_68176.htm U.S. Census Bureau. (2000). Census 2000 urban and rural classification. Retrieved on May 10, 2010 from http://www.census.gov/geo/www/ua/ua_2k.html Walker, C. O. & Greene, B. A. (2009). The relat ions between student motivational beliefs and cognitive engagement in high school. The Journal of Educational Research 102(6), 463 471. Wheelock, A. & Miao, J. (2005). The ninth grade bottleneck. The School Administrator Retrieved August 5, 2010 from http://www.aasa.org/SchoolAdministratorArticle.aspx?id=8728&terms=wheelock Whiston, S.C. & Quinby, R.F. (2009). Review of counseling outcome research. Psychology in the Schools 46(3), 267 272. Whiston, S. C., & Sexton, T. L. (1998). A review of school counseling outcome research: Implications for practice. Journal of Counseling and Development 76, 412 426. prevention. Journal of Counseling and Development 88(2), 227 235
126 Wimberly, G. L. (2002). School relationships foster access for African American students: ACT policy report Iowa City, IA: ACT. Wimberly, G. L. & Noeth, R. J. (2004). Schools involving parents in early postsecondary planning Iowa City, IA: ACT Pol icy Research Center.
127 BIOGRAPHICAL SKETCH Sophie Maxis was born in Miami, Florida and is the fifth of seven children. She was raised by her mother and grew up throughout south and central Florida. She graduated from Sarasota High School and attended Oakw ood College in Huntsville, Alabama. She earned a Bachelor of Science in mathematics education at Oakwood College. She returned to Florida to complete her Specialist in Education and Master of Education in school counseling and guidance at the University of Florida (UF). Upon completing her masters in school counseling, Sophie taught secondary mathematics in Kent and Londo n, England. Sophie returned to UF to pursue her doctoral studies. During this time, she has been engaged in work and research that supports the ways in which first generation, college bound, students access resources for college. Currently, Sophie is a p rofessional school counselor in Gainesville, Florida.