1 EXAMINING SUCCESSFUL BUS RAPID TRANSIT (BRT) IMPLEMENTATION MODELS TO DEVELOP A PRE IMPLEMENTATION EVALUATION CRITERION (PIEC) : AN APPLIC ATION TO FT. COLLINS, COLORADO AND GAINESVILLE, FLORIDA By A T HESIS PRESENTED TO THE GRADUATE SCHOOL OF THE UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF ARTS IN URBAN AND REGIONAL PLANNING UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA 2011
3 To my m other an d f ather, for all their support
4 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The completion of my thesis would not be possible without the guidance and unwavering faith of my committee members, as well as the numerous instructors in the Department of Urban and Regional Planning. I would like to give a special thanks to my chair Dr. Ruth Steiner and co chair Dr. Joseli Macedo. Both have instrumental in my success and I profoundly thank them for their belief in my work t hroughout my time in this department. They have each compelled me strive for the very best and I will forever be grateful for that. Another professor of mine, Dr. Ilir Bejleri, deserves to be recognized as well. I thank him for instilling in me his passion for Urban Design and the many nuances that go along with it. It was through his design courses that my passion and enthusiasm for urban design and urban design theory has grown. I need to also acknowledge a few of my coworkers from the City of Gainesville Public Works Department. Specifically, I would like to thank Debbie Leistner, Steve Joplin, Chris Dolan, Phil Mann, John Gilreath, Sally Adkins, and Andy Renshaw for their belief in me and for providing me with a sense of empowerment and the feeling tha t I could accomplish anything I set my mind to. They have offered me many challenges along the way and mentored my growth through the program, and for that I will be forever grateful. Last, but certainly not least, I would like to thank my loving family an d friends, without whom I would not have been able to complete this thesis. I would also like to thank all of my classmates who have touched my life throughout this journey. I h ave not only gained a m aster lanning from one of the best universities
5 in the nation, but I have also gained some life long friends through my time in this program and I will never forget my experience here.
6 TABLE OF CONTENTS page ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ................................ ................................ ............................... 4 LIST OF TABLES ................................ ................................ ................................ ............ 8 LIST OF FIGURES ................................ ................................ ................................ .......... 9 LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS ................................ ................................ ........................... 10 ABSTRACT ................................ ................................ ................................ ................... 11 CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION ................................ ................................ ................................ .... 13 Problem Statement ................................ ................................ ................................ 14 Significance of Study ................................ ................................ .............................. 16 Organization of Study ................................ ................................ ............................. 17 Case Study Context ................................ ................................ ................................ 18 BRT Model One: Curitiba, Brazil ................................ ................................ ...... 19 BRT Model Two: Bogot, Colombia ................................ ................................ 21 BRT Model Three: Eugene, Oregon ................................ ................................ 27 2 LITERATURE REVIEW ................................ ................................ .......................... 34 A Comparison of BRT, Standard Bus Transit and Light Rail ................................ ... 34 The Pur pose of Mass Transportation Systems ................................ ....................... 36 BRT and Transit Oriented Development ................................ ................................ 37 The Importance of Concentrated Population Densities ................................ ........... 39 The Role of Intermodalism with BRT ................................ ................................ ...... 40 ................................ ........... 41 Federal Funding Sources for BRT ................................ ................................ .......... 44 Other Sources of BRT Funding ................................ ................................ ............... 52 BRT Marketing Campaigns: Strategies for Success ................................ ............... 52 The GAO Report: Conducting Useful Suitability Studies ................................ ......... 54 Chapter Summary ................................ ................................ ................................ ... 55 3 METHODOLOGY ................................ ................................ ................................ .... 59 Research Design ................................ ................................ ................................ .... 59 Data Collection Methodology ................................ ................................ .................. 60 S ignificance of Using Successful Case Studies ................................ ...................... 61 Curitiba BRT: Pre Implementation Conditions ................................ .................. 63 Bogot BRT: Pre Implementation Conditio ns ................................ ................... 66 Eugene BRT: Pre Implementation Conditions ................................ .................. 70
7 Synthesization ................................ ................................ ................................ .. 72 Deve lopment of BRT Pre Implementation Evaluation Criterion (PIEC) ............ 73 An Application of Pre Implementation Evaluation Criteria (PIEC) .................... 76 4 RESULTS AND FINDINGS ................................ ................................ ..................... 82 Plans for BRT: Ft. Collins, Colorado ................................ ................................ ....... 82 Applying Pre Implementation Evaluation Criterion (PIEC): Ft. Collins, Colorado .... 84 Plans for BRT: Gainesville, Florida ................................ ................................ ......... 86 Applying Pre Implementation Evaluation Criterion (PIEC): Gainesville, Florida ...... 89 Recommendations for Ft. Collins and Gainesville ................................ .................. 91 5 CONCLUSION ................................ ................................ ................................ ........ 98 LIST OF REFERENCES ................................ ................................ ............................. 103 BIOGRAPHICAL SKETCH ................................ ................................ .......................... 105
8 LIST OF TABLES Table page 2 1 BRT Projects Funded b y New Starts ................................ ................................ .. 57 2 2 Locations that facilitate mass transit ................................ ................................ ... 57 3 1 EmX BRT Characteristics ................................ ................................ ................ 78 3 2 Model PIEC for BRT ................................ ................................ ........................... 79 4 1 PIEC Evaluation of Gainesville and Ft. Collins ................................ ................... 94
9 LIST OF FIGURES Figure page 1 1 Map of Curitiba, Brazil ................................ ................................ ........................ 30 1 2 Map of Bogot Colombia ................................ ................................ ................... 31 1 3 Bogot Trip Mode Distribut ion Chart ................................ ................................ .. 32 1 4 Map of Eugene, Oregon ................................ ................................ ..................... 33 2 1 Mass transit incorporating intermodalism ................................ ........................... 57 2 2 Very Small Starts Criterion ................................ ................................ ................. 58 2 3 Small Starts Criterion ................................ ................................ .......................... 58 2 4 New Starts Criterion. ................................ ................................ .......................... 58 3 1 EmX Route System ................................ ................................ ............................ 80 3 2 ................................ ................................ ....................... 80 3 3 Preliminary list of PIEC for BRT ................................ ................................ .......... 81 4 1 Mason Corridor Route System ................................ ................................ ........... 95 4 2 RTS in Gainesville, FL ................................ ................................ ........................ 96 4 3 Suitabili ty Map for Gainesville, FL. ................................ ................................ ..... 97
10 LIST OF ABBREVIATION S APTA American Public Transportation Association BEBR Bureau of Economic and Business Research BRT Bus Rapid Transit BRTS Bus Rapid Transit Systems (Gainesville) C BD Central Business District CUTR Center for Urban Transportation Research EmX Emerald Express System FTA Federal Transit Administration FY Fiscal Year GPS Global Positioning Systems GAO General Accounting Organization LRT Light Rail Transit MAX Me tro Area Express RIT Rede Integrada de Transporte RTS Regional Transit Systems SAFETEA LU Safe, Accountable, Flexible, Efficient Transportation Equity Act: A Legacy for Users TCRB Transit Cooperative Research Board TOD Transit Oriented Development TRB T ransportation Research Board
11 Abstract of Thesis Presented to the Graduate School of the University of Florida in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Arts in Urban and Regional Planning EXAMING SU CCESSFUL BUS RAPID TRANSIT (BRT) IMPLEMENTATION MODELS TO DEVELOP A PRE IMPLEMENTATION EVALUATION CRITERION (PIEC) : AN APPLICATION TO FT. COLLINS, COLORADO AND GAINESVILLE, FLORIDA By May 2011 Chair: Ruth Steiner Coc hair: Joseli Ma cedo Major: Urban and Regional Planning With the population ever increasing, gas prices on an upward climb, and citizens tightening their belts due to the current economic downturn, this is the mos t opportune time to look at alternative types of public t ransportation, with Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) being at the forefront. The implementation of BRT is a process that must be seriously scrutinized and thoughtfully planned out, but when applicable under certain conditions, the cost benefit analysis favors BRT o ver any other form of mass public transit. This thesis project aims to develop the necessary pre existing conditions and policies a municipality must have in place prior to implementation of a BRT system. These guidelines ensure that the BRT system will run efficiently, maintain a purpose, and will ensure the system can sustain itself once it is implemented in t o the existing transportation network. Several thrivin g BRT models will be examined and the principles they used will be applied to two existing ci ties that are proposing BRT within the confines of their existing transit system s
12 The two cities that were chosen for this study are Ft. Collins, Colorado and Gainesville, Florida. These cities will be compared and contrasted based on BRT planning pract ices used. They each have similar demographics as far as population size, total encompassing area, and both are home to major state universities, yet they both possess unique qualities that have been successful over time. The objective of this thesis is t o formulate a pre implementation e valuation criterion (PIEC) for BRT It is essential that a list of determinants is recognized so that a template can be produced and followed. Relevant literature on this topic has been thoroughly researched and compared with three flourishin g BRT models of implementation: Curitiba, Brazil, Bogot Colombia, and Eugene, Oregon. These cities have shown the ability to sustain BRT over an extended period of time in this case, greater than a year, and are routinely viewed as model systems. Once pre existing determinants are recognized, they will be applied to Ft. Collins and Gainesville to determine whether either city or both is suitable to implement and sustain BRT in the long term.
13 CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION In a time when g overnment is continuously sear ching for ways to improve the transportation infrastructure and mobility in this nation, BRT presumes to be a viable solution as we move forward with innovative methods of transportation planning. When a city decides to pursue BRT capital funding, it will need federal, s tate and local sources at its disposal. P rivate financing schemes, and locally applied taxing policies are additional methods of funding. Although BRT costs considerably less than a typical mass rapid transit s ystem, municipalities normally must secure several funding sources to meet project budgetary needs (FTA 2010). Currently, almost all of the United States BRT systems and rapid bus capital projects have been built through federal grants combined with state and local matching funds (FTA 2010). Few cities have allocated state and local funding solely for this purpose Private financing by investors is not a customary practice for paying for BRT, but it may present cities an innovative alternative to the tradit ional government grant process (BRT Policy Center, 2010). The goal for transit within municipalities should be to maximize the potential of the urban space (Newman and Kenworth, 2003 ). This can be accomplished by adapting and improving upon successful tr ansportation models already in existence, models such as those in Curitiba, Brazil, Bogot Colombia and Eugene, Oregon (BRT Policy Center, 2010). These cities have been at the forefront of BRT research and experimentation for the last two decades. By obse rving and studying past practices, while at the same time incorporating the ever changing transportation policies, a municipality can attain successful implementation of BRT
14 A significant characteristic of BRT is its symbiotic relationship with the surr ounding land use In order for BRT to truly be efficient, it should be integrated with land use. This will assure that BRT is utilized to its full capacity, thus creating a hub for economic development along the transportation corridor. Like any large scal e transit project, BRT will need one or more sources of funding for implementation, and a large portion of that funding will come from governmental grant programs. The competition for these federal grants is heated, due to the increased number of cities in search of substantial funding sources. If this money is to be used as efficiently as possible, a pre implementation evaluation criterion (PIEC) should be determined from existing successful BRT models. Municipalities will then have a basic template to fo llow w hen carrying out large scale and innovative transit improvements Problem Statement Over recent years, an increasing numb er of communities have initiated the search for alternative forms of public transportation to address issues of excessive populat ion growth and lack of transit mobility/flexibility wi thin the present street network (Newman and Kenworth, 2003 ). Yet, there is currently no tangible process for determining whether or not BRT can be applied effectively to all municipalities that seek to use it. Gainesville, Florida and Ft. Collin s, Colorado are two such cities (City of Gainesville and City of Ft. Collins, 2010). In each, suitability studies as well as cost benefit studies have either been completed or are currently underway (City of Gai nesville and City of Ft. Collins, 2010). This is to determine the long term efficiency of BRT within each municipality by weighing every nuan ce that may impact its success ( Levinson, H ., Zimmerman, S. and S. Danaher 2004 ).
15 An often o verlooked and rather crucial aspect of BRT studies in determi ning suitability for any city is the existing policies and conditions of the prospective BRT municipal ity. Many communities who wish to implement BRT within their city, but they do not have the i nfrastructure in place to support, much less sustain such a high occupancy mode of transportation. Something as simple as a poor street layout can minimize the success of BRT. Successful case studies must be applied, but should not be used to speculate t hat there is a universal solution, because this is clearly not the case. Curitiba, Brazil for example, is a thriving metropolis that encompasses a much larger transportation network than that of Eugene, Oregon. Yet both cities were able to effective ly incorporate BRT into their existing transportation network ( Levinson, H., Zi mmerman, S. and S. Danaher, 2004 ). The key to understanding the applied use of BRT is to truly understand what makes BRT successful By using successful case s tudies, with differences as prominent as the similarities each possess, one can extract a desired and necessary criteria for the creation of BRT. Since BRT is a relatively new concept for the United States, pre implementation criterion is not well establis hed. So, for a universal methodology to not have already been applied nationwide is understandable. Nevertheless, there remains a misconception by many planners and transportation planning experts alike type of flawed logic, however will only lead to investments in projects that are economically unsound and likely to fail BRT will not be appropriate for all communities ; each project requires scrutiny before any investment of funds and resources is made. As this study
16 will show, certain conditions should be in place for implementation to be carried out successfully. Aside fr om the significant investment of time, money and resources required for BRT, an additional aspect that must be accounted for is the ofte n negative stigma that has attached itself to public bus transit in the United States (Newman and Kenworth 2003 ). Ma ny believe that the bus is dirty, only intended for the lower class, a haven for crime and gangs, it never runs on time an d that it is alw ays overcrowded ( Newman and Kenworth 2003 ). In order to sell the concept to the public an aggre ssive advertising campaign should be part of the overall plan. Many believe that the city should adjust to a new transit system, but in reality BRT should be constructed in a way that fits to the These misconceptions surrounding BRT persist and that is why there is such a pressing need for the establishment of a universal c riterion for municip alities to follow. In the end, BRT would benefit all concerned, especially public officials, if they simply implement the ideal into their community. Thus they would avoid the costly shortfalls of a major planning nightmare. Significance of Study This thesis contributes to t he greater understanding of necessary, existing conditions required prior to implementation of BRT. By examining case studies th at have successfully and efficiently used BRT this research study can then concentrate on why these municipalities have succeeded in their utilization of BRT. Curitiba, Brazil, Bogot, Colombia, and Eugene, Oregon, are dissimilar in geographic size, popu lation, and existing road infrastructure, yet they have all been able execute and sustain BRT
17 for an extended period of time and are viewed by many planning experts as having created a superior application template (TCRP, 2010). This study intends to exami ne the conditions municipalities must have in place prior to BRT implementation. Once desirable pre conditions are known and extracted from successful systems, the Pre Implementati on Evaluation Criterion, or (PIE C) will be applied. In order to truly test t h is PIE C, it must be applied to prospective BRT municipalities. After careful consideration of numerous municipalities, Ft. Collins, Colorado, and Gainesville, Florida will be used for the application of the PIEC These two sites are strongly considering t he future use of BRT and have preliminary planning currently under way. This will allow for a full demonstration of just how important necessary pre implementation conditions are to a viable BRT system. Organization of Study The following study uses the d escriptive case study method to assess the BRT models of Curitiba, Brazil, Bogot Colombia and Eugene, Oregon Chapter 1 includes a brief topical overview of this study and a description of the three successful BRT models In Chapte r 2 BRT is defined and distinguished from other forms of mass transit (i.e. light rail, express bus). A review of background literature with definitions, examples, and theoretical exploration of BRT is used to provide context. Chapter 2 will review literature on the following topics, which will lead to the formulation of a pre implementation methodology: Transit Oriented Development (TOD) and its relationship with BRT, t he importance of concentrated populat ion densities surrounding BRT, past BRT marketing campaigns, the incorp oration of intermodalism with BRT, t he adaptability of existing road infrastructure to support BRT, f unding the
18 he significance of popu lation trends in determining necessity of BRT, and lastly the value of an already successful public bus system being present before implemen tation. Chapter 3 will be used to clearly define the methodology used for this study. These aforementioned topics t hat were discussed in the literature review will be analyzed individually, so that the significance and importance of each condition can tr uly be conveyed. In Chapter 4 after a careful review and analysis, significant findings w ill be discussed. Chapter 5 will attempt to draw rational conclusion from all aggregated data pertaining to BRT. Ultimately this study will determining pre implementation criterion for Gainesville, F lorida and Ft. Collins, Case Study Context This study will discuss BRT implementation of : Curitiba, Eugene, and Bogot and two experimental/comparative case studies: Gainesville, Florida and Ft. Collins, Colorado. Curitiba, Paran is located in the southeast region of Brazil and is said to be inhabitants. By contr ast Bogot Colombia lies in the northwest region of South America and is home to over 8 million people. Bogot is also one of the most technologically advanced countries on the continent. Currently, one of the leading examples fo r small scale BRT is formed in Eugene, Oregon ( Levinson, H., Zi mmerman, S. and S. Danaher, 2004 ). This city is located in the Northwestern section of the United States, currently has a population of approximately 200,000 people and is roughly the size of Gainesville, Florida (City of Eugene, 2010).
19 BRT Model One: Curitiba, Brazil Curitiba is situated in the State of Paran in southern Brazi l ( Figure 1 1). It boasts a population of approximately 1.8 million people and has been at the forefront of BRT innovation since the systems inception. Over the last thirty years, an accelerated population growth has caused the city of Curitiba to e xpand its municipal boundaries. The city is comprised of an eclectic urban mesh in which the transit system extends beyond the municipal boundary. With these circumstances comes the need to integrate the various street networks and public spac es into one single metropolitan design, a daunting task at best. Curitiba has boldly adopted an innovative approach to transportation policy. Unlike other cities, quality of life and need for efficient transportation has not necessarily been a hindrance t o this developmental process. The R ede Integrada de Transporte ( RIT), system Curitiba aids the residents, who benefit from recent developments such as employment opportunities, households, recreation, and other components of a metropolitan city. BRT in Cu ritiba helps to facilitate all of these aforementioned components. The planning and design procedure of Curi tiba's transportation system was efficient in its placement throughout the city (IPPUC, 2007). Initially, Curitiba con ceptualized a BRT system becau se of the large number of busses in the then current transit system. The cities sought out ways to improve the already existing bus system. Gradually, advancements were followed by a perpetua l long term plan for BRT Curitiba subsidize s its current bus sys tem with an economical express route system that formulated bus lanes. In attempts to enhance and further the existing system, additional methods were devised. Subsequently, a surface system came into play that mana ged to sustain more than adequate class s ervice in terms of
20 an effective transportation system, but a t a reduced cost. The BRT system contributes an array of perks for the citizens of Curitiba. Furthermore, BRT has notably reduced trav el time and advanced facilities (IPPUC, 2007). Local busses f acilitate more pas sengers per operating miles in comparison with other cities located in Brazil. This substantial use of pu blic transport has become a popular mode of transit, even though Curitiba boasts a tremendous personal vehicle ownership rate. Curit iba has the second highest per capita car ownership rate in Brazil (one car for every three people (BRT Policy Center, 2010). At least 20% of the recent passengers formerly used their personal automobiles for travelling purposes. This has resulted in reduc ed automobile crowding and traffic jams, which has given way to several cutting edge transformations within the city such as multifarious downtown streets with ample space for pedestrian malls and shopping destinations. In a time where the automobile has become a necessity to man y, bus transit often falls short of meeting commuters expectations Citizens living in the United States are more likely to drive five minutes to work then they are to b ike or walk. In Curitiba, Paran the functionality and integr ation of the BRT system is quite apparent. In order for BRT to function properly within acceptance and not of disdain toward the system itself. Currently, 84 cities worldwide T system to their transportation systems (BRT Policy Center, 2010). In 1980, Curitiba implemented this system with a population of only 700,000 inhabitants. The city had an above average growth rate at around 6% and 10% in more urbanized areas (IPPUC, 200 7). Despite the fact that Curitiba was and still is seen as
21 the first successful BRT model in the world, there are legitimate flaws with the system. There have been several instances of bicyclists being struck by busses and other automobiles. The reason fo r this is that bicyclists often try to share their riding space with the busses, dodging in and out of these designated bus lanes. The act is illegal, but rarely enforced by police. Fortunately for the city, they have recognized this problem and have now p roposed parallel bike lanes to designated bus lanes. This change is quite apparent in the plans for C Hoehn, 1995). BRT Model Two: Bogot, Colombia Bogot Colombia, a city of nearly 8 million people, has cer tainly learned a great deal of its transp ortat ion planning from Curitiba ( Figure 1 2). Before there was BRT, there were busses and automobiles running side by side in this large metropolitan city. Citizens used the busses but not as frequently as they do now. The TransMileneo system operating in Bogot is acclaime d worldwide as a standard for succ essful BRT, and the system continues to evolve Since its inception, this system has reduced the standard commuting time from ninety to thirty five minutes in Bo got Additional benefits of the TransMileneo include an im provem ent in air quality by 40% and numbe r of accidents reduced by 81% Currently, there are eight lines scattered all through the city. These busses arrive approximately every two to three minute s. In what is certainly a significant amoun t, one million people use the TransMileneo system every day. It is expected that by the year 2016, TransMileneo is expected to grow to nearly twenty two lines and transport five million passengers a day (Baltes, C ain & Darido, 2008).
22 TransMileneo has been a success in Bogot because of governmental cooperation and its acknowledgement of past BRT models. Local and f ederal government agencies provided the groundwork for implementation years in advance of BRT. Veolia serves as Bogot mastermind behind the project which happens to operate as a section of the complete TransMileneo system. TransMileneo has been able to transform the way in which people mobilize around Bogot within a short period of time. The system has spurred urban renewal programs in the city. Before the TransMileneo system was integrated into the city, there were many indicators that BRT was a viable project for the city to undertake. Air pollution became a serious problem throughout the city, and population growth was continuing to exceed existing transit accommodations. At this point it became clear that Bogot had to do something to meet the needs of this growing population. Instead of looking to light rail or a subway system, the city looked heavily at BRT, due to its overall cost and flexibility. During this search for a new, innovative, public transit system, Curitiba was one the models that arose. The mayor of Bogot at the time Enrique Pealosa, had a vision of BRT in the city of Bogot Mayor, he knew it could be done and should b e done to advance mobility within the boundaries of the city. Bogot already possessed the pre existing infra structure and population densities in place that w ould accommodate a mass transit system. At the time prior to implementation, undergoing major redevelopment. Concentrated densities were present, with major employment and residential hubs facilitating a prospective BRT s ystem. As more buildings were constructed this in turn
23 created more opportunities for business, and thus more and more people began to frequent the downtown area. As previously mentioned, Bogot already provided a pub lic bus system, but the system was not meeting the needs of the people. The city needed something different, they needed busses that seated more commuters, they needed a faster system, one in which wait time were seconds and not several minutes long. Peopl e became frustrated with the overall efficiency of public transit and demanded more from their city officials. In fact, as time went on without any improvements to the bus system, people just stopped traveling by bus, but this was not due to lack of commu ters. These people were weary of the presumed traffic inconveniences caused by bus ses It was this mindset that was so influential, that by the year 1999 bus rider ship ha d plummeted as low as 45% of commute trips. Because of this steady ridership decline in the transit system, the number of automobiles on the roads swelled and led to the beginning of a brutal cycle. A positive trend is forming now in Bogot where there are less people using personal vehicles BRT system ( Fi gure 1 3 ). Prior to implementation, Bogot offered a standardized public bus system. The problem, like for so many busses in the U.S., was that i t lacked the appeal of BRT and many people initially failed to take notice With a persuasive and informative m arketing campaign, along with a total makeover of all fleet busses, people began to look at the bus system in a more positive light. informative workshops and advertisements. These campaigns were used to ease the fe ars and strengthen the arguments for BRT.
24 In the early 1990s, the city of Bogot dealt with many issues involving lack of bus ridership. This was even worse for the city because as a direct result, 3,000 road traffic incidents were reported annually prior to the TransMileneo system and caused 800 casualties. The level of pollution was also extremely elevated. The lack of a planned municipal area sank into a state of urban dis array (McBrewster, Miller, & Vandrome, 2010). Bogota recognized what they had in terms of existing resources and infrastructure. They knew they needed to construct a system that would be economically feasible but still offer everything a light rail or subw ay system could. B uilding a subway system from scratch required a considerable investment, which the Colombian government could not dedicate to the city. There was a need to identify an alternative project that would be low cost and could become operationa l quickly; the answer was found in the form of a BRT. TransMileneo was designed under such constrained circumstances. The system was planned as a part of the ongoing urban renewal program and was the authorities hope to develop an integrated BRT system. T here were three objectives given to this project: ease the traffic load in the already congested urban area, encourage people to use the transit system to increase ridership, and improve the performance of the system while addressing the poor image problem as well (Baltes, Cain & Darido. 2008). For Bogot, the foremost advantage of the BRT system was the lower cost of implementing the project as compared to the construction of a rail based system. Bogot was able to secure a large amount of federal funding to cover the cost of the
25 initial phase of TransMileneo The federal grant covered 75 % of the project costs, and the remaining 25 % was picked up taxpayers and independent donors. Once again, federal funding is the essential element to pre implementation cr iterion for mass transit, in this case BRT. The onset of this new transit system proved to be an opportunity to services rather than considering it as just a collection of independent bus services. TransMileneo is therefore incredibly dissimilar from the prior, traditional bus services. arrival and departures, operating in corridor dedicated t o only busses only corridor which has been constructed down the middle of main avenues and is separated from traffic by two lanes (Baltes, Cain & Darido. 2008). A key aspect to the planning of this system, and a rather advantageous one, was the fact that t he road street width for the proposed corridor was already adaptable to a mass bus transit system. Because the necessary infrastructure was already present, this reinforced the point of city designers, that BRT was the best fit for Bogot Currently the T ransMileneo system functions as trunk corridors with the ability to handle high capacities that consist of four lanes. TransMileneo provides two types of services: express bus lines and local services. Express bus lines only stop at certain stations while local services stop at all stations. The stations have been constructed parallel to the running way such that they are elevated so they can be accessed by overpasses and are present no more than 500 meters apart. Like other high traffic volume structures, some of these stations allow passengers to be transferred to feeder busses which have extended the municipal coverage of the system.
26 The TransMileneo network shares the characteristics of a surface metro line including air conditioned busses floors at t he same height level as the platforms, automatically sliding doors on main bus stations, on the bus Global Positioning Systems (GPS), and real time and automated passenger information. By and large, TransMileneo offers the same efficiency and value of the rail based system at a lower cost of construction (McBrewster, Miller, & Vandrome, 2010). Construction of the BRT was scheduled to take place in four stages, starting from 1999 and expected to be completed in 2016. This phased approach to this project has enabled the city to minimize the economic burden of the construction and set detailed deadlines regarding implementation. Throughout the first phase from December 1999 till June 2001, $217 million was invested in constructing running way of 26 miles along with 61 stations (McBrewster, Miller, & Vandrome, 2010). This cost is considerably less than what it takes to construct a light or heavy rail project of the same magnitude. The District of Bogot paid for the first phase of the project through a World Ba nk loan. The average cost, 5.5 million per kilometer for constructing the first phase was also considerably less than that used for const ructing a heavy transit system (McBrewster, Miller, & Vandrome, 2010). The end of the year 2006 marked the completion o f the second phase of the project. Another two phases with specific goals and targets are expected to be implemented through 2016 (Baltes, Cain & Darido. 2008). The district decided in favor of operating contracts with no financial support from the public for managing this system. Seven operators were selected through an official tendering process that are currently providing service at their own risk, based on the
27 number of busses allotted to them each year. Initially, the operators financed these busses b ut now they own the vehicles. Veolia Transport currently holds a bulky share in four of these operating companies and 22% or 250 busses of the system are run by it (McBrewster, Miller, & Vandrome, 2010). Based on the number of busses operated, the operatin g companies have to ensure that their busses cover a certain number of kilometers in a week. The operators are paid based on the fares collected across the entire system. Because of the large number of passengers, TransMileneo has been able to transfer the commercial risk to the operators (Baltes, Cain & Darido. 2008). BRT Model Three: Eugene, Oregon Eugene, Oregon is a college town located in the Northw estern region of United States ( Figure 1 4). This city has a population of roughly 125,000 inhabitants (C ity of Eugene, 2010). With a population of that size, it would seem that there is little need for a la rge scale mass transit system. However, BRT does not have to exist solely in a metropolis, and Eugene serves as a classic example for this premise Aside from moving masses of people, there are additional, sometimes more compelling reasons, why BRT can be beneficial to a community. Primary among these reasons is that it provides a viable alternative to the personal vehicle. By constructing this BRT corridor the City of Eugene sought to limit the amount of automobile traffic to also link economic development with transportation. scale BRT system within the existing transportation network. The Emerald Express (EmX) operates as an extensive system of BRT in urban Eugene. The system is financed and regulated by Lane Transi t District (LTD). LTD takes on the responsibility of being the cardinal local authority in terms of transportation within the encompassing Lake Coun ty. LTD decided upon the
28 BRT system after processing a thorough evaluation. Light rail and other transportation alternatives were contemplated in the inspection report. In conclusion, BRT emerged as a befitting choice which suited the needs of Eugene Sprin gfield in terms of areas and rampant transportation requirements. Since its inception in January 2007, the EmX system has achieved most of its commuted a weekday aver age of 2,700 boardings. By contrast, the new system had so much initial success that daily corridor rid ership increased by 100% in the first 17 months since the service began, reaching in excess of 5,400 wee kday boardings as of April 2008 The corridor rid ership has already far surpassed the 20 year projection. In d increased by only 4.8% from 2006 to 2007 ( Lisa Callaghan Jerram, MTI, 2008 ). Based on preliminary ridership data conducted by the Mineta Transpor tation Inst itute, as many as 25% of Em X users a re new riders, with 16% of riders previously traveling by car. ( Lisa Callaghan Jerram, MTI, 2008 ). The agency has also stated that the EmX systems actually had to add several more busses on many of their local routes to meet increased passenger demand. It is assumed that this increase may simply be because the EmX is free, and in this day and age when the cost to operate a private vehicle is becoming prohibitive, it is by far the smartest choice. LTD reports that the majo rity riders have possession of system wide passes or have purchased the fare on the local feeder bus ( Lisa Callaghan Jerram, MTI. 2008 ). Early 2007 brought the launch of The Green Line route, which connected the area of downtown Springfield to downtown Eu gene. The route is roughly around four
29 miles and has ten stops on the way, which also includes the University of Oregon. As displayed in the map below, there are several nodes formed by placing this transit system along such a frequently used route. As dev elopment continues to sprawl towards the east and west, the route is expected to grow in length, thus creating additional stops and business hubs along the corridor. This system already had in place a substantial employment concentration that allowed BRT to flourish. Busses were used in Oregon before the implementation of BRT, but by no means servicing the population it now serves. Less than a year after EmX was implemented, the bus system saw ridership double along the corridor. There is little doubt that Eugene is one of the more environmentally and, one might say, innovative cities in all of the United States. The success of the EmX system can be gauged from the fact that it was given a nomination for the Sustainable Transportation Award in the year 2008 and entertained an esteemed mention as well.
30 Figure 1 1. Map of Curitiba, Brazil (Source: Google Earth, 2010)
31 Figur e 1 2. Map of Bogot Colombia (Source: Google Earth, 2010)
32 Figure 1 3. Bogot Trip Mode Distribution Chart (Source: Tran sMileneo, 2010).
33 Figure 1 4. Map of Eugene, Oregon (Source: Google Earth, 2010 )
34 CHAPTER 2 LITERATURE REVIEW Before carefully examining and analyzing model implementation criteria a review of relevant literature on the intricacies of BRT practic es, funding, and appropriate conditions fo r the system is necessary. Chapter 2 begins with the d ifferentiation of BRT and other modes of mass transportation. In addition, the term transit oriented development (TOD) is defined to help the reader understand the significance of its usage in relation to BRT. FTA criteria for BRT are discussed in detail, so that a model of conditions favorable for BRT can be formed. Funding sources are discussed, specifically several federal funding programs (i.e. News Starts, Small Starts and Very Small Starts) transportation network, as it pertains to BRT, will be discussed in detail. Lastly, strategies for successful BRT marketing campaigns are also discussed. A Comparison of BRT, Standard Bus Transit and Light Rail The term BRT is defined as an innovative, high capacity, lower cost public transit solution that can signi ficantly improve urban mobility (Neman and Kenworth 1999). It is flexible, well integrated systems that uses busses on roadways or dedicated lanes to quickly and efficiently transport passengers, while offering the flexibility to meet the transit demand (National BRT Institute, 2010). BRT systems can be customized to fit community n eeds and incorporate state of the art, low priced technologies that result in transporting more passengers. (National BRT Institute, 2010). T his system allows b usses to flow freely through highways, even when local traffic lanes are congested beyond capac citizens, along with facilitating economic development opportunities, makes BRT a
35 palatable option even for those with their own automobiles, as they find that taking the bus is getting them to their de stinations much more quickl y than in private vehicles. There is a clear distinction between BRT and standard public bus service and Light Rail Transit (LRT) Standard public bus service does not typically entail a designated lane for commut ing, stops are far less closely spaced and wait time for busses is typically 10 to 15 minutes longer than that of BRT (Newman and Kenworth 2003 ). Light Rail Transit (LRT) is an effective option for mass transit, but it requires greater investments in the fixed guideway and transit vehicles and the commitment is focused more for the long term Both BRT and LRT are intended as a me ans to spur development. When applied effectively BRT becomes the more cost effective option of the two BRT is a p ublic transportation system that has similar riding characteristics to that of LRT the only significant difference being, LRT uses a rail network, while BRT utilizes a well engineered street design. (National BRT Institute, 2010). A standard BRT system i s created to accommodate its riders with flexible and time efficient bus routes. One of the core objectives of nearly all BRT planning is a plan for economic development and connectivity throughout the city and in some cases between regions. Municipalities are seeking to not only create a more efficient transportation network, but also to form economic nodes by using a connective BRT system. (National BRT Institute, 2010). B y placing BRT in locations t hat have significant population den sity, the system is then put in an optimal position to succeed. I f there are large numbers of people using these busses, the not only will they be comfortable with this form of transit, but they will also frequent the shops, restaurants, hotels, and other destinations that w ill be built
36 along transit corridors (National BRT Institute, 2010). BRT implementation is also used as a means t o spawn new housing development. (National BRT Institute, 2010). This gives BRT yet another purpose, but wi thout the forethought to facilitate these ec onomic nodes the system operates at a minimum efficiency (Newman and Kenworth 2003 ). Connectivity is essential to maintaining and expanding established BRT syst ems. Implementation of relatively small transit corridors are constructed, some only a few miles long. This serves as the true testing ground for BRT (Newman and Kenworth 2003 ). If the system is flourishing, then there is a strong possibility of expansion. This extension of services will ultimately lead to connectivity between other tran sit modes, such as street car or LRT systems (Newman and Kenworth 2003 ). One of the primary reasons behind the establishment of BRT is not just to construct an innovative public bus system; rather it should be used to improve mobility and to promote sma rt growth (TCRP, 2010). The Purpose of Mass Transportation Systems Mass transportation systems are typically used to move large numbers of people from point A to point B (Newman and Kenworth 2003 ). ( Figure 2 1) Mass transit systems typically take the form of a subway, a light rail system or in some cases a bus system. The term is defined as public transport that comprises passeng er transportation services that are available for use by the general public, as opposed to modes for private use such as automobi les or vehicles for hire (Newman and Kenworth 2003 ). In the case of public bus systems, they typically use busses on a conventional street network for carrying many passengers on shorter trips. The primary reason mass transit exists is simply to accommoda te si gnificant concentrations of population ( Levinson, H., Zimmerman, S. and S. Danaher 2004 ). When commuters no longer want to put up with
37 the stress of driving and cost of fuel that is when mass transit becomes the logical option for many ( Levinson, H ., Zimmerman, S. and S. Danaher 2004 ). BRT and Transit Oriented Development BRT works to maximum efficiency only when all contributing factors are in ideal synchronization. BRT is a system best utilized when linked with economic and community development ( Levinson, H., Zimmerman, S. and S. Danaher, 2004 ). As previously stated, BRT is not only seen as a pioneering transportation system, but as a tool used to strengthen economic development. Transit benefits from sustaining and extend ing the pre automobile design of American cities; that is, a mixture of land uses within dense corridors simply served by transit lines (Newman and Kenworth 2003 ). Many cities in the United States adhere to certain zoning ordinances and subdivision regu lations that do not allow for Transit Oriented Development (TOD) to take shape not even in areas typically metropolitan cities that have a population over 200,000, that are already considered transit oriented ( Levinson, H., Zimmerman, S. and S. Danaher, 2004 ). Adjusting land use policies to allow for growth that is concentrated around transit nodes and corridors will help to preserve and enlarge tr ansit's base of riders. At the municipal scale, policies that eradicate barriers to in fill development and concentrated growth in central areas facilitated by transit can raise transit use ( Levinson, H., Zimmerman, S. and S. Danaher, 2004 ). When significant investments such as rail lines or bus ways are planned, cautious consideration to station area land uses can have long term benefits. At a greater scale, TOD consists of land uses that are pedestrian friendly. Many times there is an inclination to place rail or bus way stops in areas that comprise limited profitable or
38 commercial activity (Newman and Kenwort h 2003 ). Former rail rights of way are frequently located in industrial areas (since most industries want to have railroad access). However, it is much easier to increase development where there is already a solid base. Therefore, selecting an appropriat e stop locat ion becomes extremely important ( Levinson, H., Zimmerman, S. and S. Danaher, 2004 ) TOD s typically consisted of mixed use residential or commercial area designed to maximize access to public transport, and often incorporates innovative feature s to encourage transit ridership ( National BRT Institute, 2010). A T OD neighborhood will usually provide some type of transportation hub, metro stop, or in this particular study, a BRT stop. These transportation hubs are surrounded by relatively high dens ity development with progressively lower density development spreading outwards from the center ( Levinson, H ., Zimmerman, S. and S. Danaher, 2004 ). BRT uses high density development to sustain itself, because without concentrated density, BRT cannot truly flourish ( Levinson, H., Zimmerman, S. and S. Danaher, 2004 ). TODs are most commonly located within a radius of one quarter to one half mile (400 to 800 m) from a transit stop, as this is considered to be an appropriate scale for pe destrian traffic (Dittma r & Ohland, 2004 ) Architect and urbanist, Peter Calthorpe, brought together the notion of the pedestrian pocket with the idea of planning development around transit stations and is largely credited with sparking this inte rest in this type of development (D ittmar & Ohland, 2004 ). In both his design practice s and his writings, Calthorpe advanced the concept of mixed used development and density around transit. He effectively articulate d the urban design principles associated with TOD ( Figure 2 2 ).
39 If a TOD has an appropriate mix of land use, it provides an opportunity to reduce travel by internalizing trips. Internal trip capture is the ability of a mix of land uses to retain trips internal to the development in contrast to the external travel that occurs be tween a single ty pe of land use (Dittmar & Ohland, 2004 pg 42 ) A large number of studies have been conducted on the effects of mixed use on travel demands. This research consistently finds that a mix of land uses, combined with additional external factor s such as pedestrian friendly form and design, can significantly reduce the length of local network trips, mainly for midday and afterno on trips (Dittmar & Ohland, 2004 pg 43 ). Typically, when a place of employment is in a single use environment, even on e that is well served by transit, an automobile may be needed in order to conduct everyday business. But if there are appropriate retail services within walking distance, the working population is encouraged to use transit. Employer based transportation s ervices, such as subsidized transit fares, guaranteed ride home programs, and company vehicles can greatly increase transit use (Dittmar & Ohland, 2004 ) BRT and other forms of transit, such as light rail and street cars can also be used both to facilitate growth and as a means to initiate growth. Employment densities can effectively spawn growth, but only if the appropriate land uses are in place. The uses that best support mass transit systems are found in Figure 2 2 The Importance of Concentrated Popul ation Densities There is a general agreement among city planners that transit use increases, and single occupant driving decreases, as residential density increases (Dittmar & Ohland, 2004 ). However, research shows that while there is a link between reside ntial density and transit use, it is extremely intricate and complex due to a multitude of demographic
40 and socioeconomic factors (Dittmar & Ohland, 2004 ). The necessary level of density needed to create a dramatic shift in transit use is still undetermined Several transit agencies 1 recommend a minimum of seven dwelling units per acre to support basic bus service Transit and walking dramatically increase for shopping trips when residential densities reach six to twenty units per acre (Dittmar & Ohland, 200 4 ). These minimums are considerably lower than many TOD densities, which can range from forty to one hundred units p er acre (Dittmar & Ohland. 2004 ) Aside from BRT, rail transit fo cused development and its proximity to transit and density were the two str ongest predictors of transit us e. Rail station area residents are five times more likely to commute by transit as the av erage resident in the same city (Dittmar & Ohland. 2 004 ) The necessity for concentrated employment and housing densities cannot be unde rstated when it pertains to mass public transit. Rail systems are no different than BRT in that respect. Transit systems act as a feeder to businesses and vice versa. These two facets of economic development and transit planning are meant to complement one another, and without the existence of both, maximum efficiency is then lost. Population densities often help facilitate optimum use of BRT. However, these population densities do not always have to be located in the city center. They can be located on the periphery with the assistance of intermodalism. The Role of Intermodalism with BRT An interm odal system is one in which individual modes are linked, governed, and managed in a manner that creates a seamless and su stainable transportation system ( Szyliow icz 2010). Such a system should be economically efficient, environmentally 1 The transit agencies for the following municipalities: Houston, Texas, Gainesville, Florida, and Eugene, Oregon ( Levinson, H., Zimmerman, S. and S. Danaher, 2003 )
41 sound, safe and secure and ethically based ( Szyliowicz 2010). When planning for BRT, it is essential to account for other modes of transportation as well. BRT strives to facilitat e connectivity just not through an integrated public bus system but through other modes such as walking, biking, and driving (personal vehicle) (McBrewster, Miller, & Vandrome, 2010). The presence of intermodalism within a BRT system would do a great deal to establish serious interest on behalf of the commuter. Commuters are looking for systems that are convenient and when connectivity is present between the different modes of transit, this can be accomplished (McBrewster, Miller, & Vandrome, 2010). While, intermodalism is only one facet of BRT, it remains a focal point for implementation. implementation evaluation criterion for BRT T he programs principal goal is to acclimatize the standards of highly successful BRT systems, to U.S. con ditions, laws, and institutions (FTA BRT Demonstration Program, 2010). A derivative goal would be to develop a unique approach in with working with exis ting auto mobile traffic both in the BRT corridor s and cross streets, on street parking, turn conflicts, traffic signal preference for busses, more efficient fare collection and boarding, vehicle control, information, marketing, and land use and development to serve as a model for American transit operators, traffic engineers, and city officials con sidering BRT for their cities (FTA BRT Demonstration Program, 2010). This criterion is used to support demonstrations of successful BRT projects around the world It aims to adapt these same principles of successful BRT to those municipalities in the U.S. who seek to implement the system
42 The FTA views ridership levels as being a key indicator in determining the necessity of BRT within a municipality. A municipa lity must show evidence of maintaining and/or increasing ridership levels, before consideration of BRT. The goal must be to increase the rider satisfaction levels, which are essential elements of BRT (FTA BRT Demonstration Program, 2010). BRT can have nega tive or positive impacts on citizens who choose not to use the system BRT must be planned in a way that allows for traffic signals, or integration could add to travel times fo r additional users of the system. Inadvertently, this can actually cause reducti on travel times for non transit users. For instance, by doing away with on s hours ) could enigmatically benefit transit users but improve travel for all street users as well This alter ation should be weighe d against the outlay of eradicating on street parking (FTA BRT Demonstration Program, 2010). The arrangement of the urban environment has become extremely important in the compliance to utilize public transit. An essential element of the BRT eva luation process will observe how well land use policies can be implemented along with modifications in existing transit service. Municipalities must introduce policies that are more pedestrian accommodating and support a variety of land uses closest to tra nsit. Cities would allow additional growth near high occupancy transit stops. Policy implementation concerning land use could possibly have subsidiary benefits (this would allow for additional high occupancy residences or the improvement to the overall wal king experience). N evertheless the principal transit advantage is their effect on existing and potential lev els of transit ridership (FTA BRT Demonstration Program 2010).
43 One of the main objectives of BRT is to advance the overall representation of publi c transit Busses are frequently seen as a slow moving form of transport ation compared to the personal vehicle. BRT strives to alter the overall perception of public busses, to one of a well organized system that can compete with personal vehicles in an ur ban setting. Ev ery BRT component plays an instrumental role in improving the image of transit as a whole ; nonetheless, the marketing and advertising for BRT are devised deliberately for this reason. The name of the BRT service, the emblem, the color scheme and design of busses bus stops, and signage, web sites, printed materials, and the advertisements all play an essential responsibility in the representation of BRT as an aesthetically pleasing alternative to the personal vehicle (FTA BRT Demonstration Pr ogram, 2010). With all that said, an enhanced image will ultimately be measured by increased rider ship, but surveys from the citizens can also point toward the accomplishment of advertising and promotional efforts (FTA BRT Demonstration Program, 2010). D e crease in commute time permits t ransit agencies to supply equal total of service with fewer operator and vehicle hours. This will in turn progress transit effectiveness and productivity. However these savings will only be recognized when the modifications in commute time are vast because supplementary limitation s on the operation of resources may thwart a decrease in fleet si ze or work force. However it still could be feasible to redistribute resources, i.e., utilizing faster speeds to offer supplementa ry service (FTA BRT Demonstration Program, 2010). The FTA BRT Demonstration Program has been used as a tool for determining implementation indicators for BRT transit projects. However, the system does not take
44 into consideration important factors such as r oad structure, population growth, and concentrated density areas. This criterion was used as a guide for application on prospective BRT municipalities. For instance, these guidelines were used for the implem (FTA BRT Demonst ration Program, 2010) The primary purpose of utilizing an FTA BRT criterion is to determine if local municipalities have these necessary characteristics set by the FTA Federal Funding Sources for BRT The most frequently used funding source for major new "fixed guide way" transit projects is the Federal Transit Administrat ion's (FT A) New Starts program. This funding source is the key element that comprised the FTA's Section 5309 Capital Investment Program, which also funds bus facilities and rail system ad aptations. BRT is not the only transit technology that can receive New Starts money. Streetcar, rail systems, people movers and automated guide way projects can all compete for these New Starts grants (BRT Policy Center, 2010 ). Ultimately, a project must b e deemed eligible to receive this of way, or rail line, for the exclusive use of mass transpor tation and other high occupancy vehicles, or uses a fixed system and a right of 2005 ). Since 1997, the New Starts program has allocated well over $10 billion for new transit development with the majority o f these projects being rail related (BRT Policy Center, 2010) This is primarily due to the fact that BRT is still a relatively new concept to U.S cities. Until recently, very few municipalities even considered BRT construction. While the demand for New S tarts funding has significantly exceeded obtainable funds, a
45 great deal of the annual appropriation is already committed to existing grantees, which is making funding for new BRT projects very difficult (BRT Policy Center, 2010). Yet another issue has been performing BRT projects that operate on arterial roadways instead of a separate right of way. Even with all bureaucratic fallacies involved in the funding process, the number of BRT proje cts rece iving New Starts money is starting to see significant growth. For example, since early 2001, there have been six BRT projects constructed with the help of New Starts funding, and three more are close to obtaining New Starts money (BRT Policy Center, 2010) An additional four projects are in line to secure the most often used Small Starts funding. This is a significant development because before 2001, there were just four BRT systems or bus way projects that were built using the New Starts program. There are more projects scheduled for start up in the near future. L ight rail, commuter rail and heavy rail projects have all been built with the aid and support of the New Starts, Small Starts, or Very Small Starts programs (BRT Policy Center, 2010) U.S. Gove rnmental Accountability Office (GAO) yearly analysis presents some telling statistics that indicate where municipalities are headed, in terms of transportation planning. The 2008 report stated that nearly one third of the 19 projects in the New Starts pipe line for 2008 fiscal year were BRT systems or so me form of rapid bus transport. Until about five years ago, municipalities could a pply for up to 80% of the project construction costs. Due to elevated demand for New Starts funding, the FTA typically funds projects that can provide more than the minimum 2 0% allotment of federal capital (BRT Policy Center, 2010).
46 Like all federal grant programs, project applicants, generally local governments are required to complete an arduous submission process. New Starts has an extensive and meticulous funding procedure. Ultimately, to obtain funding from the federal government, the project must be recommended in the FTA's yearly New Starts report to Congress. Congress selects the New Starts, Small Starts, and Very Small Starts projects during its annual appropriations process. Projects are lobbied on behalf by key stakeholders to the FTA. O nce the FTA approves funding for a municipal transit agency T he F ederal Transit Agency evaluates projects on the basis of several criteria, such as: cost effectiveness, potential to improve mobility, and its ability to offer land use planning that supports transit (BRT Policy Center, 2010). The purpose of the Small Star ts plan is to create a more efficient way to receive funding for low cost BRT rapid bus or streetcar projects. The Small Starts category was originally created from the more expansive New Starts program in the 2005 federal transportation bill the Safe, A ccountable, Flexible, Efficient Transportation Equity Act: A Legacy for Users (SAFETEA LU). U nlike New Starts, these small need t o function solely on a divided right of way to qualify for Small Starts funding. The Small Starts fund ing first became available in fiscal year (FY) 2008 Despite the fact that uncertainties persist regarding program policies and procedures, ten BRT projects applied for the funds. The FTA recommended that four BRT projects be given a total of $52 million in 2008. The rest of the FTA's $100 million budget would be set aside for other projects expected to exhibit eligibility for 2009.
47 Funding for BRT can be allocated in many different forms. Although the subsidy may come from various and numerous sources, a municipality can only use a handful of legitimately feasible resources. Municipalities may use tax programs, state and local funding or in some instances, grant programs to help pay for transportation projects. With that known, t he federal government fu nds a majority of the capital needed to fund such a project. This is performed by issuing a federal grant to help re development in a certain area. T he GAO interviewed several national transit agencies across the globe that have experience using BRT, LRT or both within their respective cit ies in order to develop a set of standards for funding approval. After conducting all necessary interviews and extensive research, a report was published by the GAO on the topic of BRT implementation. This report conclu ded that due to the fact that funding for m ass transit systems are scarce, local municipalities will have to provide more than the 20 % maximum allotment for construction costs. Funding BRT is often seen as a hurdle for many cities, but now more than ever cities are looking for governmental assistance to fund such projects. As these municipalities look to the future, it is clear that alternative and cost effective methods of transporting its citizens are crucial. However, to accomplish this goal the gove rnment, locally ents. From heavy to light rail, commuter rail to BRT systems, the FTA's New Starts program
48 has helped to establish hundreds of new or extended transit fixed guide way systems across the country. In the process of searching for a last resort effort for fun ding, there is a supplementary source of funding for BRT and that is the Very Small Starts program. Within Section 5309 Capital Investm ent Grant legislation, it mentions Very Small Starts as a simple, low risk project that qualifies for a highly simplifi ed project evaluation and rating process by the FTA. In this case, much like the Small Starts, projects are phased into the current transportation network using an incremental approach. By using an incremental approach, a municipality does not have to inv est as much construction time and funding as it would for a larger New Starts project. The News Starts, S mall Starts, and Very Smarts programs have become essential elements in funding BRT projects, irrespective of whether the project is it large or small scale ( Figure s 2 3,2 4,2 5 ). It is part of a well thought out arrangement between public and private stakeholders. The key for those municipalities and agencies is to have a financial plan drawn up for the implementation and sustain ability of BRT. Through this process all involved parties can determine funding sources allocated and agree on the longe vity of these sources (GAO, 2008 ). Rail and bus investments, in turn, have improved the mobility issues in most cases, as well as helped to reduce congestion a nd even improve air quality in the areas they serve. Besides helping to better the transportation network, this grant program has also been responsible for cultivating the development of practical, safer, and more livable communities (GAO, 2008 ).
49 Since the Obama administration took office in early 2009, there has been an abrupt shift from the existing policy concerning federally aided transportation projects. There are now specific funding guidelines all transit projects must adhere to bef ore construction c an take place (FTA, 2005 ). Prospective transit projects will now need to be based upon livability issues, such as economic development opportunities and environmental benefits, in addition to cost and time saved, which are already used as the primary crite ria (FTA, 2005 ). As part of this initiative, the FTA will immediately rescind budget restrictions issued by the previous presidential administration in March of 2005 that focused primarily on how much a project shortened commute times in comparison to its cost. Essentially, the new policy for selecting major transit projects will work to embrace and promote the idea of livability rather than hinder it. The FTA will aim to base their funding decisions on how much transit helps the environment, how much it im proves development o pportunities and how it improves the quality of life for the everyday commuter The change will certainly impact how the FTA evaluates major transit projects going forward (FTA, 2010). In order to make accurate funding decisions, the FT A will now evaluate the environmental, community and economic development benefits provided by transit projects, as well as the congestion relief benefits from such projects. This new method will facilitate the FTA to align priorities and values with prosp ective transit investments. This recent change in policy is a referendum on developers and project managers alike. Essentially, the FTA will not only help fund innovative transit projects, but they will do so
50 Beginning in 2010, the FTA initiated a separate rulemaking process, inviting public comment on ways to appropriately measure all the benefits that result from such investments. This could be seen as a positive circumstance because it seems now that BRT projects are ready to compete for funding (FTA, 2010). The FTA will also look to fund projects that will be cost effective for state and local economies and help with smart growth development. Smart growth development aims to achieve a u nique sense of community and place; expand the range of transportation, employment, and housing choices; equitably distribute the costs and benefits of development; preserve and enhance natural and cultural resou rces; and promote public health (FTA, 2010). BRT is just one of many tools that public officials are planning to use to facilitate this growth The American Public Transportation A ssociation (APTA) cited that 72% of transit tax issues passed in the election of November 4, 2008. As a result, many n ew transportation projects are being provided by the FTA Federal Transit Administration (FTA) (FTA, 2010). This agency has been inundated with applications for projects seeking grant funding, causing the New Starts and Small Smarts program to become extrem ely competitive. The current economic environment is compelling large numbers of municipalities to search for innovative, cost effective alternatives of improved public transit services. Dissimilar to the New Starts program, transportation projects do not have to of based bus projects to secure Sect. 5309 funding (BRT Policy Center, 2010). T ypically federal New Starts covers up to 80% of project f unding, and the remaining 20% is provided by
51 the local government. However, since there is such high demand for funding among cities around the U.S., the FTA is asking cities to cover as much of the project as possible (BRT Policy Center, 2010). The advantageous aspect to a Small Starts project is that is uses a shorter, simpler evaluation and authorization process. Projects using Small Starts and Very Small Starts are generally implemented increment ally. If there is a drawback to the program it would be that it lacks the necessary funding needed. For instance, a Small Smarts project costing roughly $250 million would only be approved up to $75 million dollars, so larger BRT projects cannot meet the criteria. Moreover, the Small Starts budget is limited: Congress authorized $600 million for Small Starts through FY'09 versus $6 billion for New Starts. As helpful as the program is, New Starts has recently been proposed for budget cuts. For fiscal year 2008, FTA requested only $100 million, instead of the $200 million recommended in the authorizing legislation (BRT Policy Center, 2010) Not every city is suitable for BRT. A prosp ective user of BRT not only will have to prepare for construction of the system, but the long and short term maintenance involved as well. Like all capital improvement projects, they involved a substantial amount of capital. Cities must not ignore existing economi c conditions The New Starts, Small Starts, and Very Small Starts programs do enact cancellation of BRT projects that do not meet certain standards for funding. There are certain types of BRT projects that are deemed ineligible for program funding local and state economies are in.
52 Principally, all three of these federal g rant programs will not disburse funding for a project that cannot sustain itself. The FTA provides limited funding for operations and t hey primarily fund capital expenses However, there is great competition for these funds and local municipalities, and that is why local officials tend to aggressively lobby for their prospective BRT project. One way in which BRT systems can lobby for supp ort, is through an informative efficient advertising campaign. Other Sources of BRT Funding Federal Grant programs are not the only way to fund BRT, after all some BRT systems in the U.S. have been around before the New Starts, Small Starts, and Very Smal l Starts program were even a thought. Private investors and banks have been known to allocate funding towards transportation related capital investment programs. In the past, local municipalities have been able to put forth a large portion of project fundi ng. However, considering the shrinking funds from all levels of government (local, state, and federal), project money is most assuredly hard to find. Many municipalities will have tax programs set up to help with funding, but this generally does not cover a majority of funding. Rather, this strategy is typically used to pay for any lingering costs that may not be covered by a larger source. BRT Marketing Campaigns: Strategies for Success Any time a municipality plan offers a new form of transportation to its citizens, there is going to be some hesitance by its potential users. Th is is why it is essential to gain the trust and support of the people ; who will use the system their confidence in the project will be a large part of what pushes it forward. In t he case of BRT, there have been instances of resistance, especially in cities not familiar with the use and benefits of mass transit systems. Too many U.S. commuters perceive BRT as the less appealing
53 option to that of light rail or subway, and that is onl y because of the lack of understanding for what BRT truly is (BRT Policy Center, 2010) Throughout time, we have come to acknowledge the fact that people are resistant to what they do not understand, and this theory resonates strongly with the use of BRT h owever, this is not the case for several cities in other parts of the world. Those who use the BRT in Curitiba, Brazil, for instan ce, come from all socio economic backgrounds ; rich and poor, professionals and retirees, young and old all know the value of this system. Conveying the message of efficiency without distinguishing from social class was essential in changing the mindset of commuters. According to a Transportation Research Board (TRB) report published in 2004, there should be substantive grass r oots efforts leading up to implementation (Levinson, H., Zimmerman, S. and S. Danaher, 2004). In doing so, the transit agency can convey the positives of the system to the people before a resistance can develop The report lists several successful tactics of BRT marketing strategies. At the inception of the project Town Hall meetings should be held to provide information in a non confrontational way when initially approaching the citizens. Typically, the city will invite all relevant parties to the discuss (Levinson, H., Zimmerman, S. and S. Danaher, 2004). Constituents, public officials, and BRT experts should all be present at this meeting. There should be maximum transparency when implementing any transit system so that issues can be addressed as they are good idea at this point, to provide some literature for the citizens to take away, this
54 keeps the project alive and gives them time to think it over until the next phase of planning begins. The TRB report also suggests that someone be appointed as an i nformation s ions that may come from the people (Levinson, H., Zimmerman, S. and S. Danaher, 2004). Certainly there are additional strategies of marketing such as television commercials and newspaper ads that can inform the citizens of why BRT sho uld be implemented in their city. When using TV ads, the message must be strong, positive and backed up with testimonials. Specifically, they must convey a pro BRT agenda, but do so in a short period of time. There must be a list of positives, along with a quick comparison and contrast with other forms of public transit. For instance, many people would not know that a bi articulated bus can hold nearly the same amount of people as a typical subway train (Levinson, H., Zimmerman, S. and S. Danaher, 2004). This must be conveyed to the citizens while letting them know that this would not be a crowded alternative to a private passenger vehicle. Newspaper ads should be shown using similar tactics. Again, it must be kept short and to the poi nt (Levinson, H., Zimmerman, S. and S. Danaher, 2004). With all these factors taken into consideration, there is factor that is essential and that is funding. Without funding, there is no project. The GAO conducted a study on the cost benefit analysis between BRT and rail transit. This study has been useful in conveying the st rong characteristics that BRT provides. The GAO Report: Conducting Useful Suitability Studies The Governmental Accountability Office (GAO) supports its claims wi th extensive research, surveys and numerous interviews with transit agencies. This was an independent study conducted in a non biased manner to understand what the cost
55 benefit analysis would be if BRT was implemented in selective cities across the Unite d States (GAO, 20 08 ) The GAO also compares the cost to that of rail transit, this is imperative in understanding why BRT should be the preferred option for transit agencies searching to expand their existing public transportation systems. This FY 2008 re port contains a significant amount of info rmation that is relevant to BRT implementation specifically; it discusses the need to build within the capacity of the city. For instance, Curitiba is one of the three cases studies that will be used to extract pr e implementation criteria from. However, since the city of Curitiba is one that contains more than a million people, there are certain aspects to that BRT system that would not be relevant in a city suc h as Gainesville or Ft. Collins. That will be taken in to account when applying the PIEC to both municipalities. Fleet size and bi arterial busses are just two examples of the features that will need to be scaled down in order to properly meet the needs of Gainesville and Ft. Collins residents. If existing con ditions are not taken into account prior to implementation, this can possibly lead to a flawed and inefficient transit system. Chapter Summary Chapter 2 developed a framework from which to understand the evaluation criteria for federal funding decisions f or investments in mass transit project throughout the United States. Over time, BRT has become the choice of more cities because it is the most cost effective and flexible form of mass transit to date. BRT facilitates economic and transit oriented developm ent opportunities along the transportation corridor. If a municipality wishes to implement BRT, a federal funding source is recommended, but not essential in implementation. In all cases of documented BRT case studies, the majority of funding has come from federal grant programs. The
56 Small Starts plan. However, local officials cannot simply ask for this funding to be gra nted to them without meeting the necessary guideline s If one is to use the program, the proposed project must f it within eligibility standards This Chapter 2 establishes the importance in formulating a criterion for BRT pre implement ation conditions. This formulaic criteria inform the methodology use in t his research and discussed in Chapter 3
57 Table 2 1. BRT Projects Funded by New Starts BRT Project New Starts Funding Total Project Budget II $330 Million $618 Million Cleveland Silver Line $82.2 Million $168 Million Euge ne EmX $13.3 Million $37 Million Houston Regional Bus Plan $500 Million N/A Kansas City MAX $2.3 Million $30.7 Million Orlando LYMMO $10.5 Million $21 Million Pittsburgh West Bus way $107 Million $268 Million Source : ( BRT Policy Center, 2010) Table 2 2. Locations that facilitate mass transit Banking services Convenience retail such as drug stores and food marts A wide variety of eating establishments Child care Recreational opportunities (parks, plazas) Business retail (office supply, copy and p rint shops, overnight delivery) Personal retail (dry cleaners, hair styling, bookstores, and health clubs) ( Source: Dittmar & Ohland, 2003) Figure 2 1. Mass transit incorporating intermodalism ( Source: Dittmar & Ohland, 2003)
58 Figure 2 2. Very Small Starts Criterion (Source: FTA, 2010). Small Starts Funding request must be less than $75 million. The proj ect must ixed guide 50 % of its peak period The project must be a corridor based bus project Signal priority/pre emption, level or low floor boarding busses, branding and frequent service. Figure 2 3. S mall Starts Criterio n (Source: FTA, 2010). Figure 2 4. New Starts Criterion (Source: FTA, 2010). 2 Signal priority is used by public transit systems (i.e. light rail, bus rapid transit) to bypass traffic signals in order reach destinations without any hindrance of traffic (Levinson, H., Zimmerman, S. and S. Danaher, 2004). Very Small Star ts Transit Stations Signal Priority/Pre emption (for Bus/LRT) 2 Low Floor / Level Boarding Vehicles Special Branding of Service Frequent Service 10 min peak/15 min off peak Service offered at least 14 hours per day Existing corri dor ridership exceeding 3,000/day Less than $50 million total cost Less than $3 million per mile New Starts Funding request exceeds more then $75 million. which FTA defines as one which "utilizes and occupies a separate right of way, or rail line For the exclusive use of mass transportation and other high occupancy vehicles Uses a fixed cantenary system and a right of way usable by other forms of transportation
59 CHAPTER 3 METHODOLOGY While the FTA has specific criteria to decide amon g the many applications for funding under the Very Small Starts, Small Starts, and New Starts program, that criterion does not take into consideration other factors such as density, existing road infrastructure, and population growth. The same can be said for the FTA BRT Demonstration program. A systematic list of i mplementation criteria will begin to develop throughout Chapter 3 The methodology used in this study is largely based upon documented evidence related to successful BRT implementation models. In order to determine the efficiency and long term use of BRT, existing, successful transportation models are examined from countries, states and municipalities that have already implemented BRT. To implement BRT, a specific list of pre existing criterion mu st be present. This criterion will prove to be the main determinant used in conducting feasibility studies for BRT. Research Design This research design uses a case study methodology to accomplish the major goal of developing a PIEC which is to understa nd pre existing conditions for successful BRT systems. Three case studies of successful BRT implementations Curitiba, Bogot and Eugene form the basis of the development of models for successful implementation of BRT. These case studies are examined to d evelop a template of pre existing conditions and policies that must be in place before a BRT project can begin. Funding sources for each BRT model are carefully analyzed to better understand the necessity for specific types of funding. The purpose of obser ving these successful BRT cities is to acquire a template that will determine which conditions, roadways, and
60 policies must be in place before the project can begi n. These factors are then analyzed to understand the importance of having the necessary pre e xisting conditions suitable for BRT. Detailed planning will be ess ential to an innovative and municipality altering transit system, like that of BRT. Every detail, regardless of how insignificant it may initially seem is examined. Based upon a proper ana lysis of the characteristics of these three successful systems, a PIEC is developed. The PIEC is then applied to two cities Gainesville, Florida, and Ft. Collins, Colorado that are currently proposing BRT systems to determine of these cities are suite d for investment in BRT This study incorporate s the use of successful transportation models to conclude whi ch city would be able to sustain BRT, while considering all pre existing factors. Data Collection Methodology The evaluation of successful BRT mode ls in order to understand pre implementation criteria included multiple sources and qualitative material from documents, site visits and one interview with the chief transit planner for the City of Gainesville. FTA documents relating to capital investment projects were examined to understand the evaluation criteria used to prioritize investment decisions. These criteria were supplemented through the evaluation of s uccessful case studies of BRT implementation. The secondary sources used in the research study inc luded recommendations by the BRT Policy Center, TCRP, GAO, and FTA. P lanning documents w ere also reviewed to understand the details involved in each existing and proposed BRT system. One inter view was conducted with a leading transportation planner fo r the City of Gainesville. The discussion pertained to the operation of BRT The interview was semi
61 structured in format, allowing the investigator to gather essential knowledge as well as insight derived from additional discussions with the interviewee. T he questions related to the highlighted topics mentioned within the literature review. In order to prevent the potential of investigator bias, information included in the analysis was limited to the facts presented to the interviewee. The information obtai ned from the interviewee that was recognized as bias was fully reviewed and corrected if necessary. The University of process. The investigator followed the standard procedu re of acquiring informed approval of the interviewees, audio taping the interviews for a necessary record at a later time, and disposing of the transcripts after the completion of analysis. Significance of Using Successful Case Studies To truly understan d the significance of PIEC it is best to use practical, real life examples, and that is what this Chapter 3 conveys Three case studies were selected because of their succ essful BRT systems. The methodology carefully analyzes each system, discusses releva nt history pertaining to the specific BRT, and then recognize s the significant pre determinants that each municipality had in place before BRT implementation. Each of the three had its own set of unique conditions prior to implementation, but there were al so conditions that all three had in common. Federal funding for each project played a pivotal role in the feasibility for integration of BRT. After careful analysis of each cities proposal, it became quite apparent that without the allocation of federal funding for each, BRT would have been realized. As essential as it was to receive these funds, the money was not given freely. It had to be justified, earned, and approved. For each system, the project had to meet certain eligibility standards just to be considered for federal funding. All three systems
62 were able to meet eligibility for federal funding of BRT The use of Small Starts was vital Bogot and Curit iba both utilized funding from a private organ ization (i.e. World Bank) that covered a majority of project costs, with the other expenses being picked up by independent lenders and banks. Government can only pay for a certain portion of the allotted costs. Case studies were used to understand adaptabi lity of PIEC for mass transit, specifically, BRT. By observing real exampled of BRT success, a template can then be formed and a PIEC developed. As municipalities continue to grow, local governments are compelled to provide transit options. In the coming years there will be a growing need for mass transit usage and BRT w ill be looked at as viable transit option In fact, if trending continues as predicted BRT will become the norm rather than the exception, particularly if gas prices continue to spiral out of control. Local officials must spend wi sely because most cities within the U.S. can ill afford to make such a devastating policy mistake which is the primary reason for the formulation of a set criterion for BRT. F ederally funded t ransportation projec ts play an instrumental role in the transformation of transportation in America. However, the funding for these projects is likely to become more and more difficult to obtain. Local and State municipalities will be asked to cover more of the project costs, yet the budget is shrinking in all levels of government to accomplish this. Those municipalities who offer mo re than the required 20% project costs will be given priority over those who do not. An efficient and effective PIEC is needed to ensure that feas ible conditions are in place before implementation takes place. This is why case studies must be observed and examined.
63 Curitiba BRT: Pre Implementation Conditions Prior to implementation, there were many determinants present that led to the inception of B RT in Curitiba. It is well documented that Curitiba was the most exemplary city for this type of mass transit system. Fortunately for Curitiba, the risk was minimized because there were so many factors pointing towards new a form of innovative rapid mass t ransit. Curitiba chose BRT over light rail because although it already had a bus few busses, not enough bus routes, and wait time was unsatisfactory. Curitiba was lo oking for a transportation system that would not leave the city in complete disarray due to ongoing construction. The city was looking to construct a system that could adapt and do so in a cost effective manner. In tandem with the Master Plan, city offic ials ordained design and construction for two high capacity roads out of the intended five which would sooner or later form intrinsic passageways and determine proliferation sequence in Curitiba. The complex passageways comprised of dichotomous road system s while the main road consisted of two enclosed lanes launched for the purpose of express busses Bilateral roads that ran antagonistically were formulated parallel to the express bus lane. Due to the formation of these roads, the vernacular traffic had th e privilege of passing through Curitiba effortlessly and without hindrance. Fiv e complex passageways were constructed in 1982 along with inter city and tributary lines. Similarly, government regulated laws on how to use these facilities were put into acti on and helped in revolutionizing Curitiba. Construction of capacious residential and commercial areas was envisioned along the passageways, which would enable cumulative population densities to flourish. However, these authorized
64 conglomerates disintegrate d from cosmopolitan apartments to neighborhood residences (Rabinovitch and Hoehn, 1995). There is no question that BRT is typically more efficient when applied in city with a population of a million plus, but that is not always the rule when constructing m ass transit. For years leading up to the implementation process, there was a heated debate as to what type of rapid transit would be most efficient in terms of economics and utilization of current infrastructure. The cost of an innovative subway system w as projected at over $90 million per kilometer, versus just $200,000 per kilometer for construction of new BRT routes. This was crucial because 80 % transportation corridor would be funded by government funds. Since the time of BRT ince ption, the city reports several positive results. Travel time throughout the city has dropped dramatically, overall detrimental emissions have dropped, and total street congestion has decreased significantly (Rabinovitch and Hoehn, 1995) Currently, 75 % of in Curitiba has truly demonstrated sophistication and innovation in its practice. Traffic lights are delayed for approaching busses which lessens the amount of time in between stops for the riders. A computer chip mechanism located inside the bus triggers sensors on the road, which then alert the passengers at the next station if the bus is running on munici pality has implemented designated bus lanes. The idea may lack the feature of the system.
65 This technology allows busses to run without stopping for oncoming traffic, without the delays of stoplights and without having to wait for rush hour traffic to clear so that they can pull back out into the flow after picking up riders. Living in a town with an active bus line, one knows the countless times that traffic comes to a complete standstill while riders disembark and reload and the additional time involved for those needing wheelchair access or who have small children or, worst case scenario, a bicycle that they need to retrieve from the front of the bus. By utilizing t he concept of dedicated bus lanes, the BRT system is able to eliminate many of these issues while also keeping traffic moving in an orderly pace. Intermodalism is a concept that Curitiba and its RIT system are still attempting to master. They have been ab le to reach the large working population densities on the periphery by the use of feeder busses 3 Where Curitiba has failed, is in its incorporation of bicycles with the BRT network. Most BRT systems in Curitiba do not have adjacent bicycle routes located along the personal vehicle lanes. Acknowledging this failure, city plans will now look to add bike routes wherever there is a new BRT system being constructed. Curitiba w as able to secure some project funding t hrough state grant programs, but the largest c ontribution came from the Wo rld Bank who put forth over 80% of the construction costs. Curitiba has done a more then adequate job of persuading its citizens to understand and embrace the idea that a public transit system is not a mode of transportation th at is solely used by lower income residents. People of all from all walks of life, ages, and income levels come together to use this form of rapid transportation. 3 Feeder busses are busses that roam through neighborhoods that are generally located far from the city center and take th em to more heavily used bus station closer to downtown.
66 This was accomplished by years of strategic planning and preparation. Many workshops and pres entations were given to the p eople of Curitiba so that they w ould understand the benefits of the system. This, along with a compelling ad campaign most certainly In Curitiba, public bus transportation is thou ght of more as a common necessity than a negative riding experience. Rather than resist the implementation of the BRT system in Curitiba, the people have embraced this form of public transportation and now the network maintains a circulating fleet of 1,860 busses (not including the reserve busses, which account for nearly 300 additional busses). Public transportation in Curitiba is use d quite often. Nearly 70% BRT in order to commute to and from work, and this number has remain ed high for quite some time (Rabinovitch and Hoehn, 1995). BRT is thriving in Curitiba and this is only because intricate strategic planning that took place long before BRT was implemented Bogot BRT: Pre Implementation Conditions The TransMileneo BRT was implemented in 2001 and proved to be an immediate success by meeting the stated goal of improving system performance and increasing ridership. In the early months of its operation, the number of vehicles had to be streamlined to 18,000 to meet transportat ion needs, while the speed of the busses tripled from 5 mph to roughly 17 mph. (Baltes, Cain & Darido, 2008). The average commuting time was reduced by 60% f rom the ori ginal 90 minutes to 35 minutes (Baltes, Cain & Darido, 2008). TransMileneo daily trans ported 900,000 passengers, much higher compared to various metro lines because of an increase in ridership from just 45 % to an amazing 95 % of all commuters (Baltes, Cain & Darido, 2008). Alongside
67 these improvements, frequency of service was increased up to three busses a minute in each direction during the most congested traffic durations. The TransMileneo BRT now covers approximately 52 miles, has 114 stations throughout the area, and runs 857 articulated busses to provide service to citizens (Cannell, 2008). The daily ridership numbers have also surpassed original estimates. Today, in excess of 1.3 million people are daily riders. With 57 routes and 430 new conventional busses functioning, the feeder network stretches to 296 miles (Cannell, 2008). For the most part, the implementation of TransMileneo has renovated the network of previously entangled routes with unappealing busses into an integrated system that provides a pleasant, prompt, expedient, and competent service (Baltes, Cain & Darido. 2008). S trategic marketing, spearheaded by Enrique Pealosa was and television advertisements were broadcasted, showing the benefits of BRT in Bogot. It is undeniable that Tr ansMileneo life in the city. By reducing traffic congestion and everyday road traffic, the system has contributed in a profound way to reducing atmospheric pollution, reduced by 40 % The system has reduced tra ffic congestion and the number of on road vehicles as evident from statistics of a metropolis situated at 2,600 meters altitude and where the effect of g reenhouse gases is very visible (Cannell, 2008). There have been other notable consequences in the cont ext of urban safety. Statistics show a reduction of 81 % in automobile accidents and a reduction of 94 % of accidents where vehicles and pedestrians are both involved. Number of injuries fell by 72 % while the fatalities
68 decreased by 93 %. The number of robbe ries has also decreased by nearly 60 % (Baltes, Cain & Darido. 2008). In parallel with the central part of the BRT program, some other remarkable enhancements have been revealed including the construction of almost 155 miles of bicycle lanes, redecoration of 160 acres of walkways and civic areas, tree planting, limiting the use of private automobiles at rush hour, and the development of several park like areas and pedest rian plazas throughout the city (Cannell, 2008). Intermodalism was a point of emphasis f or the TransMileneo system in Bogot. These fringe benefits of the TransMileneo project have also affected the urban environment in a positive manner (Baltes, Cain & Darido. 2008). Bogot has done a remarkable job in incorporating the use of bicycle trans portation with that of busses and personal vehicles. In many of the TransMileneo bus station their bike renting and storage for those who choose to bike from home to the bus station, then use BRT to commute throughout the city. Finally, TransMileneo has linked neighborhoods and opened up the urban job market at a reasonable fare and therefore played a pivotal role in reducing the segregation in the society. In many ways, this project can be considered the largest social project ever accomplished in Bogot The daily roundtrip journey costs only $0.40 per trip, meaning that transportation costs are just $16 a month, which is only 6 % of the average household budget (Baltes, Cain & Darido. 2008). By contrast, the inconvenience and cost of operating a privat e vehicle, especially with the volatile gas prices, makes TransMileneo the best value without question.
69 The pricing policy has been developed while keeping in mind the varied segments within the existing and possible consumer base. The constructive impact of such a policy is that it includes all segments of the population. In terms of employment, the TransMileneo system offers higher salaries. The controlling company, Ciudad Movil, offers its bus drivers an average salary $480 per month (Cannell, 2008). Th is is above Darido. 2008). There are impressive plans for the coming years for TransMileneo including four extensions by 2016 to construct a state of the art rapid transit system of busses which will be 236 miles long and will be an international standard for sustainable urban development (Cannell, 2008). At the end of the fourth stage, TransMileneo will be able to accommodate 6.3 million passengers per day and serve as a r eminder that it is practical to build a high capacity transit system offering high service quality within a reasonable investment. TransMileneo is expected to evolve from being just a bus transit system into a more inter modal system. The currently deploye d road and rail network can be easily converted any time to into a surface rail based transit system if there is a need. One thing is for certain, TransMileneo has turned out to be a guideline for excellence and various key cities are beginning to show int erest, particularly in the United States and Asia, where so many cities are in need of an effective BRT system. It is the hope of the government of Bogot that TransMileneo will dominate the roadways and displace the automobile. Every city who invests in p ublic transit ultimately wants to become more pedestrian oriented, which means less dependency on the personal vehicle.
70 Eugene BRT: Pre Implementation Conditions After observing this system and from documents and conversations through emails with city pla nners and engineers, it became apparent that Eugene, Oregon was a perfect fit for BRT When Eugene brought in the EmX system they had something of a implementation conditions. ( Figure 3 1) Funding for the first EmX line was paid for by the Small Starts FTA Program. The initial cost of the project was $24 million. FTA covered close to 80 % of the project costs, delivering $19.2 million to the City of Eugene and its current transportation network. Without the use of Section 5307 and 53 09 funds, this project would have been nearly impossible to construct. The remaining costs were covered by budget cuts to unnecessary local expenditures. C oncentrated housing and employment densities were already present in Eugene, with the University of O regon supplying the majority of jobs. Housing densities are in the form of mass numbers of students and University employees who, for the most part, lived in close proximity to the proposed BRT corridor. These two population densities helped to provide a p urpose for construction of BRT In needed to be mentioned within the planning design phase. This was vital in order to ensure that this Green Line corridor would be constructed With this Green Line project, a door has been opened for a more intermodalistic transportation network to occur. Intermodalism has long been found throughout the urban transport ation network of Eugene, but this would mark the first time that all compre hensive planning will consider the factor of intermodalism. Bicycle routes and raised curbs a lready exist on the Green Line helping to create a designated lane separating car s bikes and busses.
71 The Lane Transit District felt that this was critical to adva ncing commuter travel times and maintaining service dependability. Nonetheless, the organization dealt with numerous problems in providing rights of way along this route. The Lane Transit District was ordered to reduce disruption to personal vehicle traff ic along the corridor, restricting their ability to eliminate parking or travel lanes. Since population growth within the metropolitan area of Eugene has been at a steady rate of 3 5 % annually, this facilitated a more detailed discussion into the implement ation of small scale mass transit s ystem. The City of Eugene sought to update its existing bus system with a more advanced, efficient, and reliable form of mass bus transit. The city essentially needed only to separate lanes by medians and decrease the nu mber of lanes from four to two. While it sounds odd that a city would want to reduce the number of traffic lanes available, it must be remembered that BRT would move the citizens in a more expeditious manner, thus eliminating the need for pr ivate modes of transportation. Even with the reduction in the number of lanes, traffic flow would be much improved The m arketing campaign was a strategic and vital measure carried out by local officials to ensure that the public understood the many ramifications of BRT i n Eugene. A year before implementation, town hall meetings were held on a weekly basis to hear and discuss the concerns of the citizens. These meetings were comprehensive, in depth, and ran the gamut of topics until all involved were comfortable with the proposal. These meetings were ongoing even after construction began and helped to allay the fears of the citizens who worried that this new system would disrupt their way of life.
72 Along with these workshops, the City of Eugene ran a number of pro BRT ad vertisements utilizing all forms of media. The goal of these efforts was to keep the people fully informed, make them feel invested in the project, and give them a voice. City government wanted to avoid any upheaval related to the construction of the EmX s ystem and their approach was to take the offense rather than have to defend the decision after the fact. All of these measures were successful as the citizens began to anxiously await the arrival of this new system and embrace the possibilities. Synthesiz ation The allocation of federal funding for BRT projects proved to be a vital piece of the concept. In order to receive available federal funding, a municipality must prove itself eligible for the funds. This is accomplished by means of a rigorous set of c riter ia which must be met in total. When applying for federal funds there is little to no leeway and no acceptable deviation of the qualifying regulations. As the findings are determined, a PIEC will be applied to Ft. Collins and Gainesville. By applying t he PIEC to the cities of Gainesville and Ft. Collins, an understanding of system feasibility can be recognized. Chapter 4 will also include the three case studies upon which this research is based. It will observe the proposed pre implementation conditions in a functional format and will lead to a greater understanding of the necessity of these conditions. These three examples of successful BRT systems were chosen for their efficiency, l ongevity, and innovation: Curitiba, Brazil, has long been perceived as the pioneering city of mass bus transit. In the city of Bogot, we find the TransMileneo mega multi modal transit system, with its planned incorporation of rail and bicycl e
73 routes. Lastly, there is the most recognized U.S. model for BRT which can be found in the cit y of Eugene, Oregon. Although not an extensive, widespread system, it still offers many of the same benefits as those of the aforementioned South American models Though dissimilar in their demographics, population size, and overall scale, the pre implementation similarities of each city are undeniable. Each one of these municipalities possessed advantageous conditions that were conducive to BR T prior to implement ation. Development of BRT Pre Implementation Evaluation Criterion (PIEC) By observing FTA Criteria for BRT and the three successful BRT implementation models, a set list of determinants will be utilized as a compulsory pre implementation evaluation criter ion. T he criterion was based primarily upon documented accounts of conditions in each of the three model BRT cities. Recommendations by external sources were taken into consideration to give the study even more relevance. However, in this study, the docume nted account of pre existing conditions prior to implementation was the most crucial aspect of this research. This is because without concrete, practical observation of these determinants in municipalities that provide BRT, one cannot acquire a true sense of value for each component. T here are several factors that are considered in developing the PIEC for BRT but perhaps the key element is funding. By carefully proposing its system in a positive and thoughtful way, federal funding became a very real opti on as the city of Eugene busses to run on. W ithout federal funding this project would not have come to fruition. The New Smarts plan in this case covered in excess of 80 % of the projects costs. As mentioned
74 in the literature review, this is common am ong projects eligible for New Smarts or Small Starts funding. In each case of mass transit planning, there a re many factors that seem to be more relevant or crucial for BRT planning then others. When it came to the proposal in Eugene, there was no more vital aspect to the realization of the concept planning then the allocation of federal funds. T he exist ence of concentrated housing employment densities is essential to the functionality and longevity of a BRT system. These two densities serve as economic nodes that provide subsistence for a BRT system, and will, in turn, ultimately spur other types of development (i.e., retail, commercial and mixed use). The importance of these existing population densities serve as an im plementation determ inant for BRT. Mass transit should be placed in areas where it serves the greatest number of citizens possible. It is these co ncentrations of homeowners, renters, and workers that will serve as a guiding beacon for BRT development. Ultimately, the methodology for this study was determined by examining the successful BRT systems in the cities of Curitiba, Bogot, and Eugene, in c oordination with relevant transit oriented topics. These cities have all proven to be transportation models that prospective BRT cities are encouraged to embrace. From the information gathered through the analysis of each system, a set of criteria was bor n. There are certain factors or determinants that are more essential for project development then others Careful examination of population trending will also serve as a key determinant for land use necessity. For example, if population trends identify an i ncrease in population within a certain section of any given municipality, that growth area must be
75 identified for potential development which meets the particular needs for that identified demographic, along with an accommodating public transit system. Obs erving population growth or decline becomes a useful indicator in determining if mass transit is, in fact, a practical solution to plan for population growth. City officials now understand the importance of having a workable alternative to travel by priv ate vehicle. With rising fuel costs, crowded streets, pollution, and working poor who cannot afford an automobile, the need is great and must be addressed. City officials know that in order to facilitate such an alternative transportation model they must first have a readily adaptable mass transit road infrastructure already in place. Simply said, there would be a significant cost benefit involved in having the right road network in place thus saving the inconvenience and excessive cost involved in the wid ening of existing roads to accommodate a BRT concept. C itizens do not favor prolonged construction with such projects. It is wildly unpopular with business owners whose stores may be completely cut off from traffic for extended periods of time, thus impa cting their revenue, and for the patrons who cannot access the services in those areas of construction. It is not unusual for this construction to cost up to three times more than a project not requiring the altering of road widths. Finally, there is an often overlooked principle for good, progressive BRT planning and that is the need for an aggressive, sound, subtly persuasive marketing campaign whi le the project is in its beginning stages Citizen buy in is a must in the creation of a successful system In the United States there is certain stigma attached to bus lines, and that notion must be completely dispelled if the project goal is to be achieved. U.S. citizens tend to associate riding the bus with being poor, but this is not the case in other
76 cou ntries. That is not to say that the citizens of Curiti ba, Bog ot, and Eugene were 100% accepting of the BRT proposal, many were not. However, they were not concerned as much about the stigma as they were about the fact that such a system might have a neg ative impact on their quality of life and the prosperity of the city (Levinson, H., Zimmerman, S. and S. Danaher, 2004). This is where clever marketing and the inclusion of the people in the developmental stage helped quell their con cerns. Local officials in all of the model areas knew that the success of their proposed system would lie, in no sm all way, with public acceptance (TCRP, 2010). They were adept in the creation of their various media campaigns so that by the time the system was up and running, the populations of these cities were more than ready to commit to BRT. The m ethodology in this study is drawn from topics discuss ed within the case studies of Curitiba, Bogot, and Eugene These topics were chosen after meticulous anal ysis of BRT and its immeasurable intricacies and nuances. Each element to pre implementation criterion carries its own significance in completing the planning of rapid bus transportation. There is most certainly a symbiotic relationship linking all determi nants together. Thus, it is relatively difficult for one element to function without the existence of one or more of the others. It is necessary that accurate and pertinent examples of each determinant be mentioned. Real life examples will only help to pr ovide a better understanding of this criterion An Application of Pre Implementation Evaluation Criteria (PIEC) This research study will attempt to apply an established list of determinants for the purpose of identifying the feasibility of BRT application in two experimental case studies. Two municipalities were selected for this application test. These areas were not
77 randomly selected, rather they were chosen due to their commitment and need to implement some form of BRT The design phase is underway and t he only current deterrent lies in acquiring the necessary funding. Throughout this Chapter 4 all pre implementation determinants will be identified in each city. First, it is necessary to so that a bet ter understanding of the current conditions can be recognized. By accomplishing this, the importance of each determinant and its effect on BRT implementation will be realized. From these three case studies, a PIEC can now be recognized and applied to th e case studies of Ft. Collins and Gainesville. A set list of pre determinants conducive to BRT was extracted from a literature review filled with pertinent topics regarding emblematic mass transit indicators. In Chapter 4 these indicators were viewed in rea lized case study form. The purpose was to achieve a firsthand account of how each system worked with the indicators and determinan ts for BRT. Chapter 4 will continue by an application of this newly formed criterion. These newly acknowledged determinants f or BRT will be used determine necessity and feasibility in the two experimental case studies: Ft. Collins, Colorado and Gainesville, Florida.
78 Table 3 1 EmX BRT Characteristics Source : D ata assembled by Lisa Callaghan Jerram from the MTI, 2008. BRT ELEMENT EMX GREEN LINE PLANNED ADDITIONS Running Way Dedicated m edian running way for 60% C urbside bus lanes for 40% Stations and Land Use Enhanced stations with near level boarding, Two transit centers, with joint development at one. Vehicles High capacity, low floor stylized hybrid busses. Multi door boarding on both sides. Service and Operation Plan 10 minute headways. All stop service only. Longer station spacing than local service. Fare Collection None for 2.5 years. Off coach, pre paid f are collection as of Sept. 09 Station ticket machines ITS TSP at all intersections, queue jump Real Time Passenger information. Marketing and Branding Strong branding and marketing program to identify EmX as premium rapid transit
79 Table 3 2 Mo del PIEC for BRT Case Study PIEC Importance Example Concentrated Employment Densities A large number of citizens should be able to use BRT for their daily commute to work. BRT and employment clusters must be linked. Curitiba Manufacturing and Industria l Industries on the periphery Bogot Downtown businesses and manufacturing industries locate on the periphery Eugene Hospital and the University of Oregon Persuasive BRT Marketing Campaign Public transit users must understand the benefits that BR T has to offer. Curitiba Television Advertisements Bogot Town Hall Meetings Eugene City information sessions, workshops Already Existing Public Bus System There must be an already effective public bus system, so that a transition in systems engin eering is not too drastic. Curitiba RIT Bogot TransMileneo Eugene EmX Adaptable Road Infrastructure Existing road infrastructure must be flexible for implementation of BRT. *Intermodalism should be incorporated in planning Suitable street widt hs were all present with initial BRT corridors for: Curitiba, Bogot and Eugene. Must Have Sustainable Funding Source A majority of all BRT systems worldwide have been funded using federal grants or private lenders. Curitiba State Grant Funding, Worl d Bank Bogot State Grant Program, World Bank Funding Eugene New Starts Funding
80 Figure 3 1 EmX Route System (Source: City of Eugene, 2010). Figure 3 2
81 Figure 3 3 Preliminary list of PIE C for BRT
82 CHAPTER 4 RESULTS AND FINDINGS Chapter 4 will discuss the BRT plans for Ft. Collins, Colorado and Gainesville, Florida. The now developed PIEC will be applied to both Ft. Collins and Gainesville in order to examine the conditions fo r each mun icipality. Chapter 4 will conclude with a comparison of PIEC to both municipalities Plans for BRT: Ft. Collins, Colorado Ft. Collins, Colorado is a college town located in northwestern Colorado. As home to Colorado State University, it is a rapidly growin g city. There are currently some 150,000 residents in the city, 5,850 of whom are faculty and staff of the University and anoth er 24,800 of whom are students (City of Ft. Collins, 2010). Ft. Collins has been nationally recognized for its quality of life, a factor that compels many to relocate there each year. From this increasing population however, comes the burden of finding ways to accommodate the citizens and their needs with appropriate development and transit options. Throughout most of Ft. Collins large and small retail, commercial and residential development is underway to keep up with the increasing demand. W ith growth comes the reality that the values and simple beauty of this city could be compromised The city cannot afford to jeopardize the values that draw so many to th e area. Prior to undertaking a BRT system the city official in Ft. Collins made it that they would not allow a transit system to disrupt the charm and lifestyle that had been established. With those concerns in mind, Ft. C oll ins has begun the implementation process, which they hope will bring them a successful BRT network while preserving the bucolic characteristics of the city.
83 As previously stated, a combination of a good quality rail merged with flexible and durable tir es of the vehicle adds to the enhanced features of MAX. The Ft. Collins system can provide the passengers with a convenient system while ensuring that the comfort of the passenger shall be given the first priority. Large windows with hand rails are install ed to assist the standing passengers and those who have boarded their bicycle too. MAX will also be equipped with a precision docking system and level boarding that would help minimize the trouble that one would usually come across due to passengers boardi ng on strollers and wheelchairs. Along with the busses transportation hubs will be constructed in high ridership areas. The architectural design of the bus will ensure to establish transit centers with stations and lots of stops that can fit effectively i nto the present scenario. In addition, there are nume rous chances to proceed with future TOD projects With the adv ancement in modern transportation technology, the schedule for the bus will be displayed in a real time system along with an automatic vendi ng machine to purchase tickets and eliminate the last minute hassle to board the bus. Hence, there would be no fare collection inside the vehicle, which is another factor that s lows the flow of the system. MAX will run along some of the more busy arterial s in Ft. Collins. Many of these routes will pa ss along student housing, commercial use and most notably, Colorado State University itself. In fact, the guide way is an integrated part of the service itself. While there is always the potential in a colle g e town for traffic to beco me gridlocked, the time that MAX would take to rea ch the destination will not be dictated by the amoun t of traffic that occurring on adjacent, personal vehicle lanes. It will have its own dedicated, controlled lanes.
84 The proposed BRT street network, known more specifically as the Mason corridor, extends five miles from north to south with Cherry Street on the north and Harmony Street on the south lying with in the city of fort Collins. MAX also branded as the Mason Area Express, is a transit system that offers many of the same qualities of a rail system but with more route flexibility. The proposed MAX system is striving to be highly efficient and will travel up to 45 mph with ITS elements allowing for non stop rides. Once waiting a t the bus stop, it can provide departure in less than ten minutes during the rush hours. At the same time, MAX has an incorporated design with two most important factors to ensure speed and convenience providing an exclusive gateway. The busses will be installed with a real time system displaying the schedule of the arrival and departure of the bus along with the facility to p ark and ride along the corridor ( Figure 4 1 ). The descriptive and theoretical assessment of successful BRT models used by Ft. Col lins and Ga inesville demonstrates how adaptable PIEC are to the success and longevity of a BRT project. Whenever there has been advancement in modern technology, the past must be examined so that it can provide a way to build from a will advance the planning and design of mass transit systems, in this case, BRT Applying Pre Implementation Evaluation Criterion (PIEC): Ft. Collins, Colorado Before plans for BRT could be established, there first had to be a strategy to gain the necessary funding to implement a Mass Transit System (MTS). Fortunately for the city of Ft. Collins, it was eligible for Small Starts funding which yielded the city $11.9 million to allocate toward s the project for FY 09. If it were not for this funding, the project design phase would have come to a halt. This is just a small portion of the
85 overall funding that will be distributed over time towards several different aspects of this proposed BRT syst em. Ft. Collins is in fact one of twenty two transit projects that were selected for Small Starts funding. A tiny portion with an estimated amount of $59.35 million will be allocated for the complete project cost that runs around $74 million, to construc t a south transit center giving high priority to traffic signal. The system also ensures to construct almost eight transit stations with numerous bus stops and 250 ride spaces. The system ensures to set accommodate an average of 3 900 passengers for daily ride once the project is completed. Several conditions are in place for BRT to be successful in Ft. Collins. The city maintains a stable population growth rate at 1.4 % and this in turn helps to facilitate growth in ridership. T he city has certainly has b een aggressive in receiving the funding for this project (City of Ft. Collins, 2010). Just over 80 % of funding for the Mason Corridor will be co ming from Small Starts funding. The remaining 20 % will be covered by the taxpayers and independent donors. The c ity of Ft. Collins has been behind this proposed BRT system for the past three years. The city has launched an aggressive and popular marketing campaign designed to win acceptance for the project. The media coverage has been ongoing and as the project mo ves forward it has become more visible. Regular town hall meetings to discuss BRT have become a staple in Ft. Collins. Initially, many citizens in the area were confused and nervous about the concept of BRT. C ity officials addressed these concerns and now conduct workshops to keep the people up to date as the project momentum accelerates. These officials believe, and history bears this out, th at the more information availa ble to future
86 commuters about Ft. Collins BRT system, the easier the transition will b e for all involved. The city was able to identify key areas of economic development within the downtown city limits. These were existing economic hubs, such as those near Colorado State University and those in the greater downtown area. These locations are highly populated nodes and are the logical choices for the establishment of a new mass transit system. Much like the previous case studies, one of the many goals includes encouraging economic development by creating these transportation corridors. With so much of the Ft. Collins population concentrated near the university and downtown district, linking the two locations with BRT is the most plausible model. The current road infrastructure for the proposed corridor is conducive to that of a BRT system. The anticipated plan calls for two designated lanes dedicated solely to the movement of busses Roads will not be widened, but existing lanes will decrease from four to two. Sidewalks will need to be widened in order to accommodate bicyclists and pedestri ans but this is a relatively easy fix requiring a minimal cash outlay and very little time to accomplish. Since a bus system is already in place, busses will be modified to a sleeker, more attractive design which will ultimately attract more riders. Plans for BRT: Gainesville, Florida The city of Gainesville, Florida is a vibrant college town loc ated in North Central Florida. It is home to the University of Florida and boasts a popul ation of roughly 125,000 people (City of Gainesville, 2010). As would be expected, the u niversity is one of the primary businesses within the city; the other is the Shands Hospital System. This teaching hospital has a sprawling campus w ith in excess of 18,000 employees The u niversity, with its 50,168 students and 12,722 staf f and faculty members, and the
87 hospital system share a common area, thus creat ing a well traveled service hub (City of Gainesville, 2010). To meet the needs of its burgeoning population, Gainesville has formally adopted a new, long term plan for transport ation. This innovative plan is intended to reduce private vehicular traffic on area roadways by shifting to a multi modal plan which will incorporate th e BRT principles. This college community established a p ublic bus system, Regional Transportation Syst em, or (RTS). This transit network contains a fleet of 120 busses with 88 busses operating during peak hours (Figure 4 2). RTS offers transportation to and from 25 diffe rent routes throughout the city (RTS, 2010) ( Figure 4 3 ). Although much of the usage i s predominantly to and from campus, there are many who use RTS to reach other areas throughout the city The current system serves the people of Gainesville, but not without serious flaws and inconveniences. RTS is a growing system, and this in turn could lead to a more effective system. The expectation is that the ridership will increase, which will allow it to become a tool to spawn development a long these proposed corridors. For the proposed Bus Rapid Transit System, (BRTS), as many as eight arterial ro utes currently in the design and engineering phase. These plans have been in preliminary staging for over five years as of 2010 (RTS, 2010). Much of the funding for RT system will come from the Very Small Starts program. Again it is anticip ated that approximately 80 % of the projects costs will be covered by the federal grant program. The system will strive to use the existi ng RTS system, but will incorporate all of the intricacies th at come with mass rapid transit (RTS, 2010).
88 The system wil l offer many of the key elements that make BRT such an efficient mode of public bus transit. Each bus will contain ITS elements that provide priority right of way, unencumbered by other vehicles. During the first stage of BRT de velopment in Gainesville a feasibility analysis was conducted by The Center for Urban Transportation Research (CUTR). This feasibility study simply pinpointed, with great accuracy, which of the main corridors within the city limits of Gainesville would be the best option for the pro posed system. The center listed several possible locations for BRT placements. Among the selected locations were: Archer Road, 13 th Street, Newberry Road, and University Avenue. Each location has been recognized as being optimal locations f or sustainable m ass transit use (RTS, 2010 ) On Archer Road, one significant factor for consideration is that this road passes in front of Shands Hospital at UF Shands larg e employee and patient population must be factored into any equation for development. While there i s heavy usage of the current bus system along this route, the wait time and inefficiency makes it a recipient of constant criticism. The population in recent years has seen moderate fluctuation. Certainly the student population will always need to be consi dered, but the city is also beginning to s ee strong growth away from the u niversity. Northwest Gainesville and East Gainesville have seen significant increases in population over the last five years. This fact is empirical evidence that demonstrates the ne ed for an upgrade in public transit. Gainesville is planning to apply for the Small Smarts grant to essentially test a small three to fou r mile corridor within the city (RTS, 2010.) As of now, the two corridors that are receiving the most attention for this grant are the Archer Road and Southwest
89 20 th Avenue areas. These are both heavily traveled corridors in desperate need of improvement. Either one or both of these roads would be optimal choices for the initial phase of the project. By considering roa d adaptability, practical concentrated population densities, and the existing usage of these routes by commuters they are prime locations, without question. 20 th Avenue site and would yield valuable insights into the feasibility of a more complex network. The Green Line Project is a 4 mile BRT corridor that cost $25 million to construct. The Green Line was funded using Small Starts, which covered most of the project costs. If Gainesville is to receive funding it must do so by presenting a project that meets all the requirements of either Small Starts or Very Small Starts. The City of Gainesville would not qualify for New Starts funding because the size of th e proposed system does not meet the basic requirements. RTS will seek financial support to initiate a testing corridor, whereby the city can implement a short term, concentrated route and monitor its function. Once the city can determine if the BRT corrido r is a success, a decision will be made to request additional federal funding for new BRT corridor projects. Applying Pre Implementation Evaluation Criterion (PIEC): Gainesville, Florida elp but be drawn to the similarities between Gainesville and Eugene. Both are college towns with comparable geographic and population sizes. Both show annual growth, and both are eager to meet the needs of their citizens. In fact, their planning for BRT i s comparable as well. Gainesville, just as Eugene did, plans to begin the process by creating a small
90 test corridor within the city. BRT would then be incrementally brought into the city, being built on a specified corridor or hub. This measured approach a lso allows the designers to revisit the proposed corridors to make certain that the need has not shifted or diminished in their proposed area. Once it is determined that the system is Just over 80 % of funding for Gaine sville would come from the Very Small Starts Grant source. The remaining 20 % will be covered by the taxpayers and independent donors. Once it is determined that the system is sustainable in its present form, the process of linking BRT routes throughout the city would begin. Gainesville has m any pre implementation conditions that would be suitable for BRT. The city has a stable population growth of 1.7 % over the last year (UF Economic and Research Bureau, 2010). Along the tested feasibility corridors, there are strong population densities pres ent. Shands Hospital and the local student housing provide great examples of the necessary employment and housing densities that must be in place prior to implementation. According to a lead transit planner for the City of Gainesville, Douglas Robinson th e existence of concentrated employment and housing densities are imperative when planning for BRT When these densities are in place it allows transit planners to accurately pinpoint optimal placement of BRT. These densities serve as a perimeter for develo pment of not only transit, but commercial and retail use as well. Large concentrations of residents remain the life source for mass transit systems, including BRT ( personal correspondence with, Douglas Robinson March 19, 2009). As previously mentioned, Ga inesville was fortunate to qualify for federal funding through New Starts
91 2005 transportation bill, Gainesville would not have been considered eligible for a funding allocation for this project. Since the inception of preliminary planning and design, there has been a grassroots effort from the City of Gainesville, in partnershi p with RTS, to educate its citizens about this innovative mass transit system. There have been numerous workshops and town hall meetings addressing all relevant questions about the prospective plans for BRT in the city. In early 2009, RTS of Gainesville asked several transportation consultants to address the concept and development of BRT The workshop was an informative meeting describing in detail the basic intent of BRT, while also providing extensive details. As it turned out, one of the consultants was a transportation engineer from Eugene Oregon, Nigel Williams. Mr. Williams was instrumental in the planning and design phase for the EmX Line in Eugene and gave a comprehensive presentation outlining in depth how BRT worked in Eugene and what Gaines ville needs to have in place for BRT to thrive. The City of Gainesville consists of several corridors that contain large concentrations of the employed and those who are homeowners/renters. Proposed corridors such as the one on Southwest 13 th Street/US441 and Archer Road contain many assets that would help to sustain BRT. Recommendations for Ft. Collins and Gainesville As planning progresses, the cities of Ft. Collins and Gainesville must learn from previous BRT models so that they do not repeat the mistak es of the past and to allow them to accurately see the future and assess its needs. To achie ve the success of a Curitiba, Bogot, or Eugene model it is imperative that a set of guidelines be established and followed. Throughout modern history, there have been countless
92 instances when municipalities rush into ill conceived construction projects, which lead to a flawed or failed venture. In the current financial climate however, it would be political suicide for a group of city leaders to undertake developme nt which was not a guaranteed success. By the same token, to continue to throw money at a system that has already outlived its usefulness would also be foolish. The time is now and the need is great. Imagine, if you will, connecting not just city hubs a nd nodes but also neighboring municipalities and eventually an entire state by utilizin g a proficient transit system. The possibilities are unbounded as cities throughout the globe search f or alternative methods of daily transport. These municipalities sho uld employ an incremental method that will afford less opportunity for error and failure BRT, like any other type of mass t ransit system has to be implemented in a way that compliments and enhances exi sting conditions. The optimum method to achieve this i s to methodically and incrementally establish the system. In keeping with this ideal, the proposed plans for Gainesville and Ft. Collins consist of relatively small corridors, extending barely four miles in total. In an effort to eliminate any possibility of a financial blunder and to allow adequate time to study the system, this becomes the best plan to follow. Both Ft. Collins and Gainesville remain in the preliminary stages for BRT implementation. However, each municipality has fully committed itself to the future use of rapid bus transit, believing it to be the answer to their growing need for an efficient, cost effective alternative to the system that is already in existence. The only barrier at this time is establishing eligibility for the required fe deral funding for the project. If
93 Gainesville and Ft. Collins are going to complete the planning and design phases, the program. City officials are preparing the requ ired documentation and are remaining diligent in scrutinizing the grant guidelines to make certain that everything falls neatly in to place when the time comes ( Table 4 1).
94 Table 4 1 PIEC Evaluation of Gainesville and Ft. Collins PIEC Gainesville FL. Ft. Collins, CO. Concentrated Employment Densities Shands Hospital and the University of Florida act as strong concentrations of employment density Colorado State University and the University Hospital act as strong concentrations of employment den sity Persuasive BRT Marketing Campaign The City Gainesville has held workshops, but the marketing campaign could be more persuasive. City information sessions, workshops Already Existing Public Bus System RTS system is efficient and ridership is o n the rise Current MAX system is efficient Adaptable Road Infrastructure Exist ing road infrastructure is conducive for implementation of BRT. *Intermodalism incorporated in planning Suitable street widths were p resent with initial proposed MAX corr idor. *Intermodalism incorporated in planning Must Have Sustainable Funding Source Stable or Growing Population Eligible for New Starts grant funding Population has been relatively stable for last three years Eligible for New Starts grant funding Population is trending slightly to growth over the last three years
95 Figure 4 1. Mason Corridor Route System (Source: City of Ft. Collins, 2010)
96 Figure 4 2 RTS in Gainesville, FL. (Source:RTS, 2010)
97 Figure 4 3 Suitabil ity Map for Gainesville, FL. (Source: City of Gainesville, 2010)
98 CHAPTER 5 CONCLUSION Throughout this study we have established that there are a number of essential guidelines required for a successful BRT venture. This study sought to acquire a PIE C by evaluating established and successful BRT systems. After the PIEC was applied to prospective BRT municipalities, an analysis can be performed as to how adaptable and effective the PIEC truly is. The one most critical factor within the PIEC is funding. BRT cannot be implemented if the capital investment is not present are not allocated. This can be from a local, state, or federal source or it from an independent donor. In all of the U.S. cases featuring BRT, federal grants have paid on average 30 80 % of project funding. Certainly t here will be alternative sources tha t could be used but that typically will not cover a ll construction costs This will provide a clear understanding as to why federal programs such as New Starts and Small Starts must continue to prevail, at least when it comes to the current economic environment BRT in the U.S. seems to be headed for an incremental approach. Transit planners will need to set the pace of BRT developme nt with a preliminary perception of the present transit ne twork and then be guided by a clear view of a preferred future network, whether it is a rail system or mass bus transit. The FTA will need to address transit c apital investme nts. The hope is that this FTA program will be expanded to include a more flexible, network wide approach as BRT becomes more accepta ble to the U.S. population. Ft. Collins and Gainesville are both ready to facilitate BRT. Although, each municipality has unique conditions from one another, they each possess the necessary
99 condition to implement BRT It is apparent that Ft. Collins is further along in its planning for BRT than Gainesville. The city has completed the preliminary design and engineering stages and is currently awaiting the disbursement of project funds. Both of these undertakings have both dissimilarities and similarities at the same time. They both share relatively the same population and boundary size. Yet, the two cities are proposing two dif ferent types of BRT projects, each serving the specific needs and constraints of their city. It is simply too much to expect a city to provide all the necessary fundin g for any form of mass transit project, be it small or large scale. Municipalities are a lready experiencing substantial budget constraints as it is This is where our government becomes a key player via the Federal Transit Agency and its federal program funding. The government also rewards well developed submissions and sees the advantage of undertaking the proposed enhancement using the incremental method. FTA is far more likely to allocate money for smaller projects (i.e., Small Starts, Very Small Starts) than for larger scale transit projects (i.e., New Starts), which is why the requiremen ts are so stringent. This study has shown that PIEC should be used for efficient and successful implementation of BRT. This is a concept which must be entered into advisedly and with meticulous forethought without the direction of those who have gone befo re failure is almost a certainty. Muni cipalities are beginning to take notice of BRT, primarily for its cost effectiveness and the ability to integrate both large and small scale systems into existing means of mass transit. As previously mentioned in the l iterature review, the
100 findings of this study, it is apparent that BRT can be a multi use syste m not just for large metropolises such as Curitiba and Bogot but for smaller cities as well. Ft. Collins, Colorado; Eugene, Oregon; and Gainesville, Florida have all demonstrated they had or have the necessary pre implementation conditions to sustain BR T and certainly the need is there as well. Discussion : Painstakingly intricate planning is essential to ensure the success of this type of innovative and municipality altering transit system the size of a BRT proposal. Once proper analysis of the character istics mentioned can be determined in the cities of Ft. Collins, Colorado and Gaines ville, Florida, the optimum city(s) for a BRT system is made based upon the eventual development of an evaluation criterion. The Starts programs are used to facil itate BRT projects There is an obvious variation in criteria when comparing New Starts with Small Starts and Very Small Starts. As previously stated, the New Starts program typically is used to fund larger transit project s, such as a metropolis to metro polis type mass transit system, but can be used for smaller projects. Small Starts and Very Small Starts are used most frequently, due to the fact that requirements for this program are more feasible for municipalities; loca l governments simply do not have the capital to consider larger scale projects. In light of the current financial crisis in this country, the coffers of the local governments have minimal discretionary funds available and are, in fact, being forced to tab le projects bec ause funding is not available. This is why federal funds play a major role in the dev elopment of these BRT systems. Typically, there need to be sources of
101 funding in addition to governmental sources. In some instances a wealthy independent d onor or group of donors may step up to provide for the shortfall: private banks, corporations, and in some cases through a transportation tax. This final option ultimately makes the city population the providers for project funding, but in order to accomp lish this, it becomes incumbent upon the city officials to have the support of the citizens. As this study concluded, a lthough Curitiba is seen as the pioneerin g city for BRT, there are still significant flaws with the RIT system, albeit minor in comparis on to the scale of the network. Bogot and Eugene have recognized these defects and have made the necessa ry adjustments to their BRT corridors One such defect is that Curitiba, when designing the fi rst BRT corridor, did not plan efficiently for intermodal ism with BRT. This means that on occasion one will find bicyclists using bus lanes for commuting. Although illegal, it is still occurring on a regular basis. This practice should be completely eliminated within the next year as plans are underway to provid e a dedicated bicycle lane throughout the network. This was seen as a major planning blunder because it created a hazardous situation for both the busses and the bicycle commuters. Curitiba has learned from its mistakes and made necessary adjustments with later bus lines. For instance, will be 18 kilometers long and accommodated with bicycle lanes throughout the entire corridor. to complete ly reshape the city for years to come and t hey do not want to miss out on such an advantageous opportunity There is a real chance for an evolution into a society that
102 is less dependent on the personal vehicle and more dependent on other means of transit. Bogot a nd Eugene have learned from its predecessors and each has built a This only further proves that viewing the practices of the past provides invaluable expertise and insight pertaining to BRT and its myriad of components. Just as Bogot and Eugene studied Curitiba for its transit planning practices, the same process is necessary to understand the pre implementation conditions for BRT in Ft. Collins and Ga inesville.
103 LIST OF REFERENCES Baltes, M., Cain, A, and Darido, G. (2007) Applicability of TransMileneo Bus Rapid Transit System of Bogot, Colombia, to the United States. Retrieved online from http://www.veoliatransportation.com/transit/bus rapid transit/key contracts/bogota Bogot http://thecityfix.com/files/2008/08/tranmi.jpg BRT Policy Center. (2010 ). Transmilenio. Retrieved online from http://www.gobrt.org/TransMileneo.html Calthorpe, Peter and Fulton, William (2001) The Regional City Island Pres s. Washington D.C. Carmona, M., Heath, T., Hoc, T., and Tiesdale, S. (2003) Public Places Urban Spaces: The Dimensions of Urban Design Architectural Press. New York, New York City of Eugen e (2010) Lan e Transit District EmX History http://www.ltd.org/search/showresult.html?versionthread=45a4b83927fba5cb751c741bf 4ac81e3 City of Ft. Coll ins. (2010) Mason Corridor General Overview http://www.fcgov.com/mason/general overview.php City of Gainesville. (2010). Regional Transit Systems BRT Draft Report http://www.go rts.com/busrapidtransit/documents/RTS BRT Feasibility_Draft Report_TM 2 FINAL REPORT_3 31 2010.pdf Dittmar, Hank and Gloria Ohland. (2004). The New Transit Town: The Best Practices in Transit Oriented Development. Island Press. Washington D.C. Dunphy, Robert T. (2005). Developing Around Transit: Strategies and Solutions That Work. Washington, D.C. Urban Land Institute. Federal Transit Admin istration (FTA) U.S Department of Transportation (2010) FTA BRT Demonstration Program. http://www.fta.dot.gov/research_4243.html Federal Transit Administration ( FTA ) United States Department of Tr ansportation. (2005). Demand Performance of Bus Rapid Transit Journal of Public Transportation. Vol. 8, No. 1, p. 41 55 Washington, D.C. Transportation Research Board. Instituto de Pesquisa e Planejar Urbano de Curitiba ( IPPUC ) (2007). Magazine fro m the Institute of Research and Urban Planning of Curitiba. Retrieved online from http://www.ippuc.org.br/ippucweb/sasi/home/
104 Irazbel, Clara. (2005). City Making And Governance In The Americas: C uritiba and Portland. Farnham. Ashgate Publishing. Levinson, H., Zimmerman, S. and S. Danaher (2004 ). Transit Cooperative Research Program (Report 118) Washington, D.C. Transportation Research Board http://www.community wealth.org/_pdfs/articles publications/tools/tod/tool tcrp bus rapid transit.pdf McBre wster J., Miller P. and A. Vand ome. (2010). Bus Rapid Transit: Implementation of bus rapid transit by country, Quality Bus Corridor, Bus lane, Metrobus (Istanbul), Great American streetcar scandal ,... Quality Assurance in Public Transport. Mauritius. Alphascript Publishing. Newman Peter and Jeffrey Kenworth (2003). Sustainability and C ities: Overcoming Automobile Independence Washington, D.C. Island Press. Niles J. and Callaghan Jeram, J. (2010.) From Busses to BRT: Case Studies of Incremental BRT Projects in North America. Mineta Transportation Institute. Retrieved from internet: Ju ne, 12 th 2010. http://transweb.sjsu.edu/mtiportal/research/publications/documents/2704_book%20(6.1 5.10%20with%20Covers).pdf Rabino vitch, J and Hoehn, J. (2005). A Sustainable Urban Transportation System: the Lansing, MI: Michigan State University, The Environmental and Natural Resources Policy and Training Project Szyliowicz, J. (2010). Intermo dalism: The Promise and The Challenge University of Denver and Mississippi State National Center for Intermodal Transportation Retrieved online from http://www.ise.msstate.edu/ncit/tech_trans/1.Szyliowicz Intermodalism%20the%20Challenge%20%20the%20Promise.htm#_ftn1 United States G overnmental A ccountability O ffice (GAO). (200 3 ). Bus Rapid Transit Offers Communities a Flex ible Mass Transit Option. Testimony by Federal Transit Administration before United States Senate Committee on Banking, Housing and Urban Affairs. http://www.gao.gov/new.items/d03729t.pdf U niversity of Florida (U F ) Bureau of Economic and Business Research (BEBR). (2010). http://www.bebr.ufl.edu/category/subject index/population trends
105 BIOGRAPHICAL SKETCH Kevin Biegler w as born in Delray Beach, Florida in 1985. As one of five children, two brothers and two sisters, he was raised by his parents George and Jamie Biegler. After graduating Atlantic High School in 2003, he attended Palm Beach Community College for a year and a half, and later transferred to Santa Fe Community College in Gainesville, Florida. It was there that he acquired his Associate of Arts Degree that allowed him to enter the University of Florida as a Junior. Kevin spent the next two years working towards h is Bachelor of Arts Degree in p olitical s cience with a m inor in u rban and r egional p to take classes for the minor in u rban p lanning. This is where his passion started and has never abated. He graduated in August of 2007. Shortly after undergraduate grad uation, Kevin began his m aster rban and r egional p lanning and also embarked on an internship with the City of Gainesville as a project intern. Kevin would start school during the fall sem ester of 2007. After his first two semesters of Graduate School, he decided that an opportunity to study abroad in Brazil was something he could just not ignore. It was there, that he knew he wanted to focus on a specialization of transportation planning. In Curitiba, Brazil, Kevin conducted extensive research on this topic and has chosen to apply much of this research to his thesis. Curitiba is home to one of them most innovative and successful Bus Rapid Transit systems in the world and as seen as the pion eer city for this type of transit. After coming back from Brazil, Kevin continued working for the City of Gainesville, assisting Public Works engineers in map making, surveys, and GIS work. Since Kevin is acquiring two egrees from the University of Florida, the other being in Public Affairs, he decided to take some time away from work to concentrate on
106 the writing of both thes es. In the spring graduated with his m aster s in u rban and r egional p lanning. Thi s was followed by his second m aster s in public a ffairs, for which he defend his thesis in the spring semester of 2011. When all course work was completed and his time here was done at the Univer sity of Florida, Kevin hoped he contribute d to the field of t ransportatio n planning. Transportation planning is where his true passion lies. He will now hope to use his passion, enthusiasm and skills acquired through school and work experiences to help change the world of planning.