University of Florida Digital Collections Home
UFDC Home myUFDC Home  |   Help 
<%BANNER%>

A Linear Input-Varying Framework for Modeling and Control of Morphing Aircraft

Permanent Link: http://ufdc.ufl.edu/UFE0042424/00001

Material Information

Title: A Linear Input-Varying Framework for Modeling and Control of Morphing Aircraft
Physical Description: 1 online resource (200 p.)
Language: english
Creator: GRANT,DANIEL THURMOND
Publisher: University of Florida
Place of Publication: Gainesville, Fla.
Publication Date: 2011

Subjects

Subjects / Keywords: AIRCRAFT -- CONTROL -- DYNAMICS -- MORPHING -- UNMANNED
Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering -- Dissertations, Academic -- UF
Genre: Aerospace Engineering thesis, Ph.D.
bibliography   ( marcgt )
theses   ( marcgt )
government publication (state, provincial, terriorial, dependent)   ( marcgt )
born-digital   ( sobekcm )
Electronic Thesis or Dissertation

Notes

Abstract: Morphing, which changes the shape and configuration of an aircraft, is being adopted to expand mission capabilities of aircraft. The introduction of biological-inspired morphing is particularly attractive in that highly-agile birds present examples of desired shapes and configurations. A previous study adopted such morphing by designing a multiple-joint wing that represented the shoulder and elbow joints of a bird. The resulting variable-gull aircraft could rotate the wing section vertically at these joints to alter the flight dynamics. This paper extends that multiple-joint concept to allow a variable-sweep wing with independent inboard and outboard sections. The aircraft is designed and analyzed to demonstrate the range of flight dynamics which result from the morphing. In particular, the vehicle is shown to have enhanced crosswind rejection which is a certainly critical metric for the urban environments in which these aircraft are anticipated to operate. Mission capability can be enabled by morphing an aircraft to optimize its aerodynamics and associated flight dynamics for each maneuver. Such optimization often consider the steady-state behavior of the configuration; however, the transient behavior must also be analyzed. In particular, the time-varying inertias have an effect on the flight dynamics that can adversely affect mission performance if not properly compensated. These inertia terms cause coupling between the longitudinal and lateral-directional dynamics even for maneuvers around trim. A simulation of a variable-sweep aircraft undergoing a symmetric morphing for an altitude change shows a noticeable lateral translation in the flight path because of the induced asymmetry. The flight dynamics of morphing aircraft must be analyzed to ensure shape-changing trajectories have the desired characteristics. The tools for describing flight dynamics of fixed-geometry aircraft are not valid for time-varying systems such as morphing aircraft. This paper introduces a method to relate the flight dynamics of morphing aircraft by interpreting a time-varying eigenvector in terms of flight modes. The time-varying eigenvector is actually defined through a decomposition of the state-transition matrix and thus describes an entire response through a morphing trajectory. A variable-sweep aircraft is analyzed to demonstrate the information that is obtained through this method and how the flight dynamics are altered by the time-varying morphing. Also, morphing vehicles have inherently time-varying dynamics due to the alteration of their configurations; consequently, the numerous techniques for analysis and control of time-invariant systems are inappropriate. Therefore, a control scheme is introduced that directly considers a concept of time-varying pole to command morphing. The resulting trajectory minimizing tracking error for either a state response or a pole response.
General Note: In the series University of Florida Digital Collections.
General Note: Includes vita.
Bibliography: Includes bibliographical references.
Source of Description: Description based on online resource; title from PDF title page.
Source of Description: This bibliographic record is available under the Creative Commons CC0 public domain dedication. The University of Florida Libraries, as creator of this bibliographic record, has waived all rights to it worldwide under copyright law, including all related and neighboring rights, to the extent allowed by law.
Statement of Responsibility: by DANIEL THURMOND GRANT.
Thesis: Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of Florida, 2011.
Local: Adviser: Lind, Richard C.

Record Information

Source Institution: UFRGP
Rights Management: Applicable rights reserved.
Classification: lcc - LD1780 2011
System ID: UFE0042424:00001

Permanent Link: http://ufdc.ufl.edu/UFE0042424/00001

Material Information

Title: A Linear Input-Varying Framework for Modeling and Control of Morphing Aircraft
Physical Description: 1 online resource (200 p.)
Language: english
Creator: GRANT,DANIEL THURMOND
Publisher: University of Florida
Place of Publication: Gainesville, Fla.
Publication Date: 2011

Subjects

Subjects / Keywords: AIRCRAFT -- CONTROL -- DYNAMICS -- MORPHING -- UNMANNED
Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering -- Dissertations, Academic -- UF
Genre: Aerospace Engineering thesis, Ph.D.
bibliography   ( marcgt )
theses   ( marcgt )
government publication (state, provincial, terriorial, dependent)   ( marcgt )
born-digital   ( sobekcm )
Electronic Thesis or Dissertation

Notes

Abstract: Morphing, which changes the shape and configuration of an aircraft, is being adopted to expand mission capabilities of aircraft. The introduction of biological-inspired morphing is particularly attractive in that highly-agile birds present examples of desired shapes and configurations. A previous study adopted such morphing by designing a multiple-joint wing that represented the shoulder and elbow joints of a bird. The resulting variable-gull aircraft could rotate the wing section vertically at these joints to alter the flight dynamics. This paper extends that multiple-joint concept to allow a variable-sweep wing with independent inboard and outboard sections. The aircraft is designed and analyzed to demonstrate the range of flight dynamics which result from the morphing. In particular, the vehicle is shown to have enhanced crosswind rejection which is a certainly critical metric for the urban environments in which these aircraft are anticipated to operate. Mission capability can be enabled by morphing an aircraft to optimize its aerodynamics and associated flight dynamics for each maneuver. Such optimization often consider the steady-state behavior of the configuration; however, the transient behavior must also be analyzed. In particular, the time-varying inertias have an effect on the flight dynamics that can adversely affect mission performance if not properly compensated. These inertia terms cause coupling between the longitudinal and lateral-directional dynamics even for maneuvers around trim. A simulation of a variable-sweep aircraft undergoing a symmetric morphing for an altitude change shows a noticeable lateral translation in the flight path because of the induced asymmetry. The flight dynamics of morphing aircraft must be analyzed to ensure shape-changing trajectories have the desired characteristics. The tools for describing flight dynamics of fixed-geometry aircraft are not valid for time-varying systems such as morphing aircraft. This paper introduces a method to relate the flight dynamics of morphing aircraft by interpreting a time-varying eigenvector in terms of flight modes. The time-varying eigenvector is actually defined through a decomposition of the state-transition matrix and thus describes an entire response through a morphing trajectory. A variable-sweep aircraft is analyzed to demonstrate the information that is obtained through this method and how the flight dynamics are altered by the time-varying morphing. Also, morphing vehicles have inherently time-varying dynamics due to the alteration of their configurations; consequently, the numerous techniques for analysis and control of time-invariant systems are inappropriate. Therefore, a control scheme is introduced that directly considers a concept of time-varying pole to command morphing. The resulting trajectory minimizing tracking error for either a state response or a pole response.
General Note: In the series University of Florida Digital Collections.
General Note: Includes vita.
Bibliography: Includes bibliographical references.
Source of Description: Description based on online resource; title from PDF title page.
Source of Description: This bibliographic record is available under the Creative Commons CC0 public domain dedication. The University of Florida Libraries, as creator of this bibliographic record, has waived all rights to it worldwide under copyright law, including all related and neighboring rights, to the extent allowed by law.
Statement of Responsibility: by DANIEL THURMOND GRANT.
Thesis: Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of Florida, 2011.
Local: Adviser: Lind, Richard C.

Record Information

Source Institution: UFRGP
Rights Management: Applicable rights reserved.
Classification: lcc - LD1780 2011
System ID: UFE0042424:00001


This item has the following downloads:


Full Text

PAGE 1

ALINEARINPUT-VARYINGFRAMEWORKFORMODELINGANDCONTROLOFMORPHINGAIRCRAFTByDANIELT.GRANTADISSERTATIONPRESENTEDTOTHEGRADUATESCHOOLOFTHEUNIVERSITYOFFLORIDAINPARTIALFULFILLMENTOFTHEREQUIREMENTSFORTHEDEGREEOFDOCTOROFPHILOSOPHYUNIVERSITYOFFLORIDA2011 1

PAGE 2

c2011DanielT.Grant 2

PAGE 3

\IcandoallthingsthroughChristwhichstrengthensme" Philippians4:13 Dedicatedwithlovetomywifeandfamily 3

PAGE 4

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS IwouldrstliketoacknowledgetheUniversityofFloridaandUnitedStatesAirForceforsupportingmyambitionandgivingmetheopportunitytoconductsuchresearch.ThanksshouldbegiventoDr.WarrenDixon,Dr.PrabirBarooah,Dr.PeterIfjuandDr.OscarCrisalleforprovidingdirectionandservingasmycommitteemembers.IwouldalsoliketothankmyseniorlabfellowsDr.MujahidAbdulrahim,Dr.AdamWatkins,Dr.RyanCausey,Dr.JosephKehoeandDr.SeanRegisfordfortheirpatienceandguidancewhilementoringme.MuchthanksisgiventomycolleaguesSankethBhat,BrianRoberts,RobertLove,BaronJohnson,RyanHurley,AbePachikara,DongTranandStevenSorelyfortheirsupport,inspiration,andperseverance.IwouldliketoextendmysincerestthanksandgratitudetoDr.RickLindforhiseortsinsupportingmyeducation,guidanceinacademia,andprovidingmewithaninvaluableopportunitytoachievesuccess.Withoutthecontinuoussupportandunconditionalloveofmyfamilyandfriends,noneofthisworkwouldhavebeenpossible.Lastandmostimportant,IwouldliketothankmylovingwifeforbeingtheshininglightbehindallthatIdo. 4

PAGE 5

TABLEOFCONTENTS page ACKNOWLEDGMENTS ................................. 4 LISTOFTABLES ..................................... 9 LISTOFFIGURES .................................... 11 ABSTRACT ........................................ 17 CHAPTER 1INTRODUCTION .................................. 19 1.1Motivation .................................... 19 1.2ProblemDescription .............................. 20 1.3ProblemStatement ............................... 23 1.3.1Contributions .............................. 24 1.3.2Papers .................................. 25 1.4DissertationOverview ............................. 28 2EQUATIONSOFMOTION ............................. 29 2.1AircraftAxisSystem .............................. 29 2.1.1BodyAxisSystem ............................ 29 2.1.2StabilityAxisSystem .......................... 29 2.1.3EarthAxisSystem ........................... 30 2.2CoordinateTransformations .......................... 31 2.2.1EarthtoBodyFrame .......................... 31 2.2.2StabilitytoBodyFrame ........................ 33 2.3NonlinearEquationsofMotion ........................ 34 2.3.1DynamicEquations ........................... 34 2.3.1.1Forceequations ........................ 34 2.3.1.2Momentequations ...................... 39 2.3.2KinematicEquations .......................... 43 2.3.2.1Orientationequations .................... 43 2.3.2.2Positionequations ...................... 44 2.3.3TheEquationsCollected ........................ 45 2.4LinearizedEquationsofMotion ........................ 46 2.5Examples .................................... 49 2.5.1Linearization ............................... 50 2.5.2AsymmetricMorphing ......................... 53 2.5.3SymmetricConguration ........................ 54 2.6ATechnicalApproachtotheEquationsofMotion .............. 55 5

PAGE 6

3LINEARTIME-VARYINGEIGENSTRUCTURESANDTHEIRSTABILITY:ASURVEY ...................................... 57 3.1DenitionofanLTVSystem .......................... 57 3.2Kamen'sConceptofPolesofanLTVSystem ................. 57 3.2.1TwoStateSystem ............................ 57 3.2.2FourStateSystem ............................ 58 3.3ZhuandJohnson ................................ 60 3.3.1GeneralizedPD-Eigenvectors ...................... 62 3.3.2StabilityCriteria ............................ 63 3.4Wu ........................................ 64 3.4.1Formulation ............................... 64 3.4.2StabilityCriteria ............................ 66 3.5O'BrienandIglesias .............................. 67 3.5.1Formulation ............................... 67 3.5.2StabilityCriteria ............................ 69 3.5.3SpecialCases .............................. 71 3.6MethodologyComparisons ........................... 71 4LINEARTIME-VARYINGMODALANALYSIS ................. 74 4.1SystemDynamics ................................ 74 4.1.1LinearTime-InvariantSystems:Formulation ............. 74 4.1.2LinearTime-InvariantSystems:Response ............... 75 4.1.3LinearTime-VaryingSystems:Formulation .............. 76 4.1.4LinearTime-VaryingSystems:Response ............... 77 4.2ModalInterpretation:Kamen ......................... 78 4.2.1Damping ................................. 79 4.2.2Frequency ................................ 80 4.3ModalInterpretation:O'Brien ......................... 81 4.3.1DampingandNaturalFrequency .................... 81 4.3.2ModeShapes .............................. 82 4.4Example:SimpleMechanicalSystem ..................... 83 5CONTROLDESIGN ................................. 94 5.1InherentClosed-LoopNonlinearity ...................... 94 5.2Quasi-StaticApproach ............................. 95 5.2.1Synthesis ................................. 95 5.2.2Example:Gull-WingedAircraft .................... 96 5.3StabilizingControl:DisturbanceRejection .................. 97 5.3.1Synthesis ................................. 97 5.3.2Example:Chord-VaryingMorphing .................. 100 5.4FeedForwardOptimalControl ......................... 102 5.4.1State-ResponseTracking ........................ 102 5.4.2Pole-ResponseTracking ......................... 103 6

PAGE 7

5.4.3Example:Mass-SpringSystem .................... 104 5.4.3.1System ............................. 104 5.4.3.2MorphingBasis ........................ 104 5.4.3.3TrackingaSystemResponse:PolynomialMorphing .... 106 5.4.3.4TrackingaSystemResponse:Piecewise-PolynomialMorphing 107 5.4.3.5TrackingaPoleResponse:PolynomialMorphing ..... 108 5.4.3.6TrackingaPoleResponse:Piecewise-PolynomialMorphing 110 5.5H1FeedbackControl:WithoutInertialEects ............... 112 5.6FutureWorkandChallenges .......................... 117 6EXAMPLEOFVARIABLESWEEPAIRCRAFT ................. 120 6.1Design ...................................... 120 6.1.1BiologicalInspiration .......................... 120 6.1.2MechanicalDesign ............................ 121 6.1.3TechnicalSpecications ......................... 123 6.2Modeling ..................................... 125 6.2.1ComputationalTools .......................... 125 6.2.2SweepDetermination .......................... 127 6.3AerodynamicProperties ............................ 128 6.3.1SymmetricCongurations:Aerodynamics ............... 128 6.3.2SymmetricCongurations:FlightDynamics ............. 130 6.3.3AsymmetricCongurations ....................... 133 6.3.3.1Flightdynamics ........................ 135 6.3.3.2Modecharacterization .................... 136 6.3.3.3Crosswindrejection ...................... 138 6.4DynamicProperties ............................... 140 6.4.1MissionScenario ............................. 140 6.4.1.1Divemaneuver ........................ 141 6.4.1.2Turnmaneuver ........................ 141 6.4.2MassDistribution ............................ 142 6.4.3ManeuverAssumptions ......................... 143 6.4.4DiveManuever ............................. 144 6.4.4.1Modeling ........................... 144 6.4.4.2Altitudecontroller ...................... 145 6.4.4.3Time-varyingdynamics .................... 146 6.4.4.4Simulation ........................... 147 6.4.4.5Missionevaluation ...................... 149 6.4.4.6Eectsoftime-varyinginertia ................ 150 6.4.5CoordinatedTurnManeuver ...................... 152 6.4.5.1Modeling ........................... 152 6.4.5.2Turncontroller ........................ 153 6.4.5.3Time-varyingdynamics .................... 154 6.4.5.4Simulation ........................... 155 6.4.5.5Missionevaluation ...................... 159 7

PAGE 8

6.4.5.6Eectsoftime-varyinginertia ................ 160 6.5Time-VaryingModalAnalysis ......................... 161 6.5.1Kamen'sMethod ............................ 161 6.5.1.1Statespacemodel ...................... 161 6.5.1.2Morphingtrajectory ..................... 163 6.5.1.3Time-varyingpoles ...................... 163 6.5.1.4Modalinterpretation ..................... 167 6.5.2O'Brien'sMethod ............................ 169 6.5.2.1Statespacemodel ...................... 169 6.5.2.2Time-varyingpolesandstabilitymodes ........... 172 6.6FeedforwardControl .............................. 178 6.6.1MorphingBasis ............................. 178 6.6.2TrackingASystemResponse ...................... 182 6.6.2.1Polynomialmorphing ..................... 182 6.6.2.2Piecewise-polynomialmorphing ............... 183 6.6.3TrackingaPoleResponse ........................ 184 6.6.3.1Polynomialmorphing ..................... 184 6.6.3.2Piecewise-polynomialmorphing ............... 186 7CONCLUSION .................................... 188 REFERENCES ....................................... 190 BIOGRAPHICALSKETCH ................................ 200 8

PAGE 9

LISTOFTABLES Table page 1-1Publicationsresultingfromresearch ......................... 27 4-1Mass-spring-dampersystemparameters ....................... 84 5-1Gainsforchord-varyingaircraftdisturbancerejectioncontroller ......... 100 5-2Boundsoncoecientofmorphingbasis ...................... 106 5-3Optimalpolynomialmorphingtotrackdesiredpolynomialmorphing ...... 106 5-4Optimalpolynomialmorphingtotrackdesiredsinusoidalmorphing ....... 106 5-5Optimalpiecewise-polynomialmorphingtotrackdesiredsinusoidalmorphing .. 108 5-6Optimalpolynomialmorphingtotrackdesiredpolynomialmorphing ...... 109 5-7Optimalpolynomialmorphingtotrackdesiredsinusoidalmorphing ....... 109 5-8Optimalpolynomialmorphingtotrackdesiredsinusoidalmorphing ....... 111 6-1Empennagespecications .............................. 124 6-2Referenceparametersforsymmetricsweep ..................... 125 6-3Setofeigenvalues ................................... 137 6-4Timeconstantsofnon-oscillatorymodes ...................... 137 6-5Modeshapesofnon-oscillatorymodes ....................... 138 6-6Modalpropertiesofoscillatorymodes ........................ 138 6-7Modeshapesofoscillatorymodes .......................... 139 6-8Individualpointmasses ............................... 143 6-9Characteristicsofelementsgivenascentroidposition(in)andmomentsofinertia(gin2) ........................................ 143 6-10Boundsoncoecientofmorphingbasis ...................... 181 6-11Optimalpolynomialmorphingtotrackdesiredpolynomialmorphing ...... 182 6-12Optimalpolynomialmorphingtotrackdesiredsinusoidalmorphing ....... 182 6-13Optimalpiecewise-polynomialmorphingtotrackdesiredsinusoidalmorphing .. 184 6-14Optimalpolynomialmorphingtotrackdesiredpolynomialmorphing ...... 185 6-15Optimalpolynomialmorphingtotrackdesiredsinusoidalmorphing ....... 185 9

PAGE 10

6-16Optimalpiecewise-polynomialmorphingtotrackdesiredsinusoidalmorphing .. 187 10

PAGE 11

LISTOFFIGURES Figure page 1-1Surveillancemissionthroughanurbanenvironment ................ 19 1-2Vision-basedpathplanning ............................. 20 1-3Readinessformissioncapability ........................... 21 1-4MorphingMAVs:A)CapableofhorizontalmorphingB)Capableofverticalmorphing ....................................... 21 2-1Body-FixedCoordinateFrame ............................ 29 2-2StabilityCoordinateFrame ............................. 30 2-3Earth-FixedCoordinateFrame ........................... 30 2-4Rotationthrough .................................. 31 2-5Rotationthrough .................................. 32 2-6Rotationthrough .................................. 33 2-7AsymmetricCongurations ............................. 53 2-8SymmetricCongurations .............................. 54 4-1Mass-Spring-DamperSystem ............................ 84 4-2Time-VaryingResponses:A)Non-Inertal:State1(|),State2()-356()-356()]TJ /F1 11.955 Tf 36.42 0 Td[()B)Inertial:State1(|),State2()-221()-223()]TJ /F1 11.955 Tf 33.2 0 Td[() ....................... 86 4-3Time-VaryingModes:A)Non-Inertal:Mode1(|),Mode2(\000)]TJ /F1 11.955 Tf 27.9 0 Td[()B)Inertial:Mode1(|),Mode2()-221()-223()]TJ /F1 11.955 Tf 33.2 0 Td[() ........................... 87 4-4Time-VaryingPoles:A)Non-Inertal:Pole1(\000)]TJ /F1 11.955 Tf 27.9 0 Td[(),Pole2(\001)]TJ /F1 11.955 Tf 21.92 0 Td[(),RealportionofdiscreteLTIpoles(|),Poleaverage()B)Inertial:Pole1()-267()-267()]TJ /F1 11.955 Tf 34.29 0 Td[(),Pole2()-222()]TJ /F1 11.955 Tf 27.23 0 Td[(),RealportionofdiscreteLTIpoles(|),Poleaverage() ....... 88 4-5Non-InertialTime-VaryingEigenvectors:A)Eigenvector1:(1,1)(|),(2,1)(\000)]TJ /F1 11.955 Tf 9.3 0 Td[()B)Eigenvector2:(1,1)(|),(2,1)()-222()-222()]TJ /F1 11.955 Tf 33.21 0 Td[() .................. 89 4-6InertialTime-VaryingEigenvectors:A)Eigenvector1:(1,1)(|),(2,1)()-119()-118()]TJ /F1 11.955 Tf 30.74 0 Td[()B)Eigenvector2:(1,1)(|),(2,1)()-222()-222()]TJ /F1 11.955 Tf 33.21 0 Td[() .................... 90 4-7Non-InertialQcolumnvectorvalues:A)Q11(|),Q21()-278()-278()]TJ /F1 11.955 Tf 34.55 0 Td[()B)Q12(|),Q22()-222()-222()]TJ /F1 11.955 Tf 33.21 0 Td[() ..................................... 90 4-8Qcolumnperiodicity:Q11(|),Q21()-221()-223()]TJ /F1 11.955 Tf 33.2 0 Td[() ................... 91 11

PAGE 12

4-9Qcolumnfrequency:ImaginarypartofdiscreteLTIpole(|),1Qcolumnperiodicity(\000)]TJ /F1 11.955 Tf 9.3 0 Td[() ........................................... 91 4-10InertialQcolumnvectorvalues:A)Q11(|),Q21(\000)]TJ /F1 11.955 Tf 27.9 0 Td[()B)Q12(|),Q22(\000)]TJ /F1 11.955 Tf 9.3 0 Td[() ........................................... 92 4-11Qcolumnperiodicity:Q11(|),Q21()-221()-223()]TJ /F1 11.955 Tf 33.2 0 Td[() ................... 93 4-12Qcolumnfrequency:ImaginarypartofdiscreteLTIpole(|),LTVapproximatedfrequency()-222()-222()]TJ /F1 11.955 Tf 33.21 0 Td[() .................................. 93 5-1Model-FollowingSystem ............................... 97 5-2SimulationsoftheGull-MorphingAircraftModel ................. 97 5-3Chord-VaryingMAVModel(m) ........................... 100 5-4AngleofAttackResponseandAssociatedChordofAircraft ........... 101 5-5ResponsestoChord-VaryingMorphing ....................... 102 5-6ArchitectureforState-ResponseTracking ...................... 103 5-7ArchitectureforPole-ResponseTracking ...................... 104 5-8Mass-Spring-DamperSystem ............................ 104 5-9DesiredResponse(|)andOptimalResponse(\000)]TJ /F1 11.955 Tf 27.89 0 Td[()forA)First-OrderMorphingandB)Second-OrderMorphingandC)Third-OrderMorphing .......... 107 5-10DesiredResponse(|)andOptimalResponse()-222()-222()]TJ /F1 11.955 Tf 33.21 0 Td[()forSinusoidalMorphing 108 5-11DesiredResponse(|)andOptimalResponse()-222()-222()]TJ /F1 11.955 Tf 33.21 0 Td[()forSinusoidalMorphing 109 5-12DesiredResponse(|)andOptimalResponse(\000)]TJ /F1 11.955 Tf 27.89 0 Td[()forA)First-OrderMorphingandB)Second-OrderMorphingandC)Third-OrderMorphing .......... 110 5-13DesiredResponse(|)andOptimalResponse()-222()-222()]TJ /F1 11.955 Tf 33.21 0 Td[()forSinusoidalMorphing 111 5-14DesiredResponse(|)andOptimalResponse()-222()-222()]TJ /F1 11.955 Tf 33.21 0 Td[()forSinusoidalMorphing 111 6-1PicturesofSeagulls .................................. 120 6-2JointsonWing .................................... 121 6-3FloatingElbowJoint ................................. 122 6-4Feather-LikeElements ................................ 122 6-5Trackandrunnersystem ............................... 123 6-6Underwingsparstructure .............................. 124 12

PAGE 13

6-7Modelingoftheliftvectors ............................. 125 6-8Modelingofthetrailinglegvectors ......................... 126 6-9SweepCongurations ................................. 127 6-10SweepAngles ..................................... 128 6-11VariationofLiftwithAngleofAttackforSymmetricSweep ........... 129 6-12VariationofPitchMomentwithAngleofAttackforSymmetricSweep ..... 129 6-13VariationofRollMomentwithRollRateforSymmetricSweep .......... 130 6-14VariationofYawMomentwithAngleofSideslipforSymmetricSweep ..... 130 6-15Modeltostate-spaceowchart ........................... 131 6-16NumberofUnstablePolesofLongitudinalDynamicsforSymmetricSweep ... 131 6-17NumberofUnstablePolesofLateral-DirectionalDynamicsforSymmetricSweep 132 6-18NumberofOscillatoryPolesforLongitudinalDynamicswithSymmetricSweep 132 6-19NumberofOscillatoryPolesforLateral-DirectionalDynamicswithSymmetricSweep ......................................... 133 6-20VariationofLiftwithAngleofAttackforAsymmetricSweep ........... 134 6-21VariationofPitchMomentwithAngleofAttackforAsymmetricSweep ..... 134 6-22VariationofRollMomentwithRollRateforAsymmetricSweep ......... 134 6-23VariationofYawMomentwithAngleofSideslipforAsymmetricSweep ..... 135 6-24VariationofCoupledAerodynamicsforAsymmetricSweep ............ 135 6-25NumberofUnstablePolesforDynamicswithAsymmetricSweep ........ 136 6-26NumberofOscillatoryPolesforDynamicswithAsymmetricSweep ....... 136 6-27EectiveAnglesofSideslip .............................. 139 6-28MaximumAngleofSideslipatwhichAircraftcanTrim .............. 140 6-29PointMassLocations ................................. 143 6-30ChangeinVelocityBasedonSymmetricMorphing:0deg( {2{ ),5deg( {/{ ),10deg( {{ ),15deg( {{ ),20deg( {.{ ),25deg( {{ ),30deg( {4{ ) ...... 144 6-31Closed-LoopBlockDiagram ............................. 146 6-32PlantModelwithTrimLogic ............................ 147 13

PAGE 14

6-33MorphingCongurationforFastMorphing( | ),SlowMorphing( )-222()-222()]TJ ET 0 0 1 RG 0 0 1 rg BT /F1 11.955 Tf 398.84 -11.96 Td[() .... 148 6-34AltitudeinResponsetoFastMorphing( | ),SlowMorphing( ::: ),FixedSwept( \000)]TJ ET 0 0 1 RG 0 0 1 rg BT /F1 11.955 Tf 36.22 -50.31 Td[(),FixedStraight( )-221(\001 ) .............................. 149 6-35PitchAngle(left)andPitchRate(right)inResponsetoFastMorphing( | ),SlowMorphing( ::: ),FixedSwept( )-221()-223()]TJ ET 0 0 1 RG 0 0 1 rg BT /F1 11.955 Tf 239.46 -88.66 Td[(),FixedStraight( )-222(\001 ) ........ 149 6-36AltitudeinResponsetoFastMorphing( | ),SlowMorphing( ::: ),FixedSwept( \000)]TJ ET 0 0 1 RG 0 0 1 rg BT /F1 11.955 Tf 36.22 -127.02 Td[(),FixedStraight( )-221(\001 ) .............................. 150 6-37AltitudeinResponsetoFastMorphing( | ),SlowMorphing( ::: ),FixedSwept( \000)]TJ ET 0 0 1 RG 0 0 1 rg BT /F1 11.955 Tf 36.22 -165.37 Td[(),FixedStraight( )-221(\001 ) .............................. 151 6-38AltitudeinResponsetoFastMorphing( | ),SlowMorphing( ::: ),FastMorphingWithoutInertia( )-222(\001 ),SlowMorphingWithoutInertia( )-222()-222()]TJ ET 0 0 1 RG 0 0 1 rg BT /F1 11.955 Tf 363.15 -203.72 Td[() ........ 152 6-39ChangeinVelocityBasedonAsymmetricMorphing:0deg( {2{ ),5deg( {/{ ),10deg( {{ ),15deg( {{ ),20deg( {.{ ),25deg( {{ ),30deg( {4{ ) ...... 153 6-40Open-LoopBlockDiagram .............................. 154 6-41PlantModelwithTrimLogic ............................ 155 6-42MorphingCongurationforFastMorphing( | ),SlowMorphing( )-222()-222()]TJ ET 0 0 1 RG 0 0 1 rg BT /F1 11.955 Tf 398.84 -313.8 Td[() .... 156 6-43TurninResponsetoFastMorphing( | ),SlowMorphing( ::: ),FixedSwept( \000)]TJ ET 0 0 1 RG 0 0 1 rg BT /F1 11.955 Tf 36.22 -352.15 Td[(),FixedStraight( )-169(\001 ):A)ThecompleteturnproleB)Theturnproleat270degreesC)Theturnproleat180degrees ................... 157 6-44RollAngle(left)andRollRate(right)inResponsetoFastMorphing(|),SlowMorphing()-222()-222()]TJ /F1 11.955 Tf 33.21 0 Td[() .................................. 157 6-45YawAngle(left)andYawRate(right)inResponsetoFastMorphing(|),SlowMorphing()-222()-222()]TJ /F1 11.955 Tf 33.21 0 Td[() .................................. 158 6-46PitchAngle(left)andPitchRate(right)inResponsetoFastMorphing(|),SlowMorphing()-222()-222()]TJ /F1 11.955 Tf 33.21 0 Td[() ............................... 158 6-47TurninResponsetoFastMorphing(|),SlowMorphing(:::),FixedSwept(\000)]TJ /F1 11.955 Tf 9.3 0 Td[(),FixedStraight()-221(\001) .............................. 159 6-48TurninResponsetoFastMorphing(|),SlowMorphing(:::),FastMorphingWithoutInertia()-222(\001),SlowMorphingWithoutInertia()-222()-222()]TJ /F1 11.955 Tf 33.21 0 Td[() ........ 160 6-49LongitudinalStatesduringMorphingfrom+30degto0degover1sec:ForwardVelocity(upperleft),VerticalVelocity(upperright),PitchRate(lowerleft),PitchAngle(lowerright) ............................... 164 14

PAGE 15

6-50LinearTime-VaryingPoles(|)andLinearTime-InvariantPoles()-20()-21()]TJ /F1 11.955 Tf 28.39 0 Td[()duringMorphingfrom+30degto0degover1sec:RealPart(upperleft)andImaginaryPart(lowerleft)ofp41andp42,RealPart(upperright)andImaginaryPart(lowerright)ofp43andp44 ................................. 165 6-51ModesAssociatedwithTime-VaryingPolesduringMorphingfrom+30degto0degover1sec:RealPart(upperleft)andImaginaryPart(lowerleft)of41and42,RealPart(upperright)andImaginaryPart(lowerright)of43and44 166 6-52NormalizedEigenvectorsAssociatedwithTime-VaryingModesduringMorphingfrom+30degto0degover1sec:Magnitude(upperleft)andPhase(lowerleft)ofv1andMagnitude(upperright)andPhase(lowerright)ofv2 ......... 167 6-53NaturalFrequencyAssociatedwithLinearTime-VaryingPoles(|)andLinearTime-InvariantPoles()-94()-95()]TJ /F1 11.955 Tf 30.16 0 Td[()duringMorphingfrom+30degto0degover1sec:Poles1and2(left)andPoles3and4(right) ................... 168 6-54EnvelopeAssociatedwithLinearTime-VaryingPoles(|)andLinearTime-InvariantPoles()-257()-257()]TJ /F1 11.955 Tf 34.04 0 Td[()duringMorphingfrom+30degto0degover1sec:Poles1and2(left)andPoles3and4(right) .......................... 169 6-55DampingRatioAssociatedwithLinearTime-VaryingPoles(|)andLinearTime-InvariantPoles()-257()-257()]TJ /F1 11.955 Tf 34.04 0 Td[()duringMorphingfrom+30degto0degover1sec:Poles1and2(left)andPoles3and4(right) .......................... 169 6-56Stabilitymodechangevstimechange:10degrees(|),20degrees()-258()-259()]TJ /F1 11.955 Tf 34.08 0 Td[(),30degrees(---)A)2secondsB)5secondsC)10secondsD)20seconds ..... 173 6-57Stabilitymodechangevsdegreechange:20seconds(|),10seconds()-216()-216()]TJ /F1 11.955 Tf 33.06 0 Td[(),5seconds(---),2seconds()A)10degreesB)20degreesC)30degrees .... 174 6-58Polechangevstimechange:10degrees(|),20degrees()-327()-328()]TJ /F1 11.955 Tf 35.73 0 Td[(),30degrees(---)A)2secondsB)5secondsC)10secondsD)20seconds .......... 175 6-59Polechangevsdegreechange:20seconds(|),10seconds()-281()-283()]TJ /F1 11.955 Tf 34.64 0 Td[(),5seconds(---),2seconds()A)10degreesB)20degreesC)30degrees ......... 176 6-60Longitudinalaircraft30degree,10secondmorphA)polesets:polesets1and2()-271()-271()]TJ /F1 11.955 Tf 34.38 0 Td[(),polesets3and4(---),time-invariantfrozentimeeigenvalues(|)B)stabilitymodes:mode1(|)mode2()-222()-222()]TJ /F1 11.955 Tf 33.21 0 Td[()mode3(---)mode4() .. 177 6-61LongitudinalaircraftQcolumnvectors1and2for30degree,10secondmorph:A)Q11(|)Q21()-252()-252()]TJ /F1 11.955 Tf 33.93 0 Td[()Q31(---)Q41()B)Q12(|)Q22()-252()-252()]TJ /F1 11.955 Tf 33.93 0 Td[()Q32(---)Q42() .................................... 178 6-62LongitudinalaircraftQcolumnvectors3and4for30degree,10secondmorph:A,B)Q13(|)Q23()-256()-256()]TJ /F1 11.955 Tf 34.03 0 Td[()Q33(---)Q43()C,D)Q14(|)Q24()-256()-256()]TJ /F1 11.955 Tf 34.02 0 Td[()Q34(---)Q44() ................................. 179 15

PAGE 16

6-63LongitudinalaircraftstateresponsesA)state1(u)B)state2(w)C)state3(q)D)state4() ................................... 180 6-64Longitudinalaircraftcolumneigenvectorsfor30degree,10secondmorph:A)V11(|)V21()-100()-101()]TJ /F1 11.955 Tf 30.3 0 Td[()V31(---)V41()B)V12(|)V22()-100()-101()]TJ /F1 11.955 Tf 30.3 0 Td[()V32(---)V42()C)V13(|)V23()-98()-98()]TJ /F1 11.955 Tf 30.24 0 Td[()V33(---)V43()D)V14(|)V24()-98()]TJ -391.46 -14.45 Td[()]TJ /F1 11.955 Tf 9.3 0 Td[()V34(---)V44() ............................... 181 6-65DesiredResponse(|)andOptimalResponse(\000)]TJ /F1 11.955 Tf 27.89 0 Td[()forA)First-OrderMorphingandB)Second-OrderMorphingandC)Third-OrderMorphing .......... 183 6-66DesiredResponse(|)andOptimalResponse()-222()-222()]TJ /F1 11.955 Tf 33.21 0 Td[()forSinusoidalMorphing 184 6-67DesiredResponse(|)andOptimalResponse()-222()-222()]TJ /F1 11.955 Tf 33.21 0 Td[()forSinusoidalMorphing 185 6-68A)ResponsetoMorphingTrajectory:Desired(|),Optimized()-281()-282()]TJ /F1 11.955 Tf 34.63 0 Td[()B)ResponsetoMorphingTrajectory:Desired(|),Optimized(\000)]TJ /F1 11.955 Tf 27.89 0 Td[()C)ResponsetoMorphingTrajectory:Desired(|),Optimized()-222()-222()]TJ /F1 11.955 Tf 33.21 0 Td[() ............ 186 6-69ResponsetoMorphingTrajectory:Desired(|)andOptimized()-221()-223()]TJ /F1 11.955 Tf 33.2 0 Td[() .... 187 6-70ResponsetoMorphingTrajectory:Desired(|)andOptimized()-221()-223()]TJ /F1 11.955 Tf 33.2 0 Td[() .... 187 16

PAGE 17

AbstractofDissertationPresentedtotheGraduateSchooloftheUniversityofFloridainPartialFulllmentoftheRequirementsfortheDegreeofDoctorofPhilosophyALINEARINPUT-VARYINGFRAMEWORKFORMODELINGANDCONTROLOFMORPHINGAIRCRAFTByDanielT.GrantMay2011Chair:RickLindMajor:AerospaceEngineering Morphing,whichchangestheshapeandcongurationofanaircraft,isbeingadoptedtoexpandmissioncapabilitiesofaircraft.Theintroductionofbiological-inspiredmorphingisparticularlyattractiveinthathighly-agilebirdspresentexamplesofdesiredshapesandcongurations.Apreviousstudyadoptedsuchmorphingbydesigningamultiple-jointwingthatrepresentedtheshoulderandelbowjointsofabird.Theresultingvariable-gullaircraftcouldrotatethewingsectionverticallyatthesejointstoaltertheightdynamics.Thispaperextendsthatmultiple-jointconcepttoallowavariable-sweepwingwithindependentinboardandoutboardsections.Theaircraftisdesignedandanalyzedtodemonstratetherangeofightdynamicswhichresultfromthemorphing.Inparticular,thevehicleisshowntohaveenhancedcrosswindrejectionwhichisacertainlycriticalmetricfortheurbanenvironmentsinwhichtheseaircraftareanticipatedtooperate. Missioncapabilitycanbeenabledbymorphinganaircrafttooptimizeitsaerodynamicsandassociatedightdynamicsforeachmaneuver.Suchoptimizationoftenconsiderthesteady-statebehavioroftheconguration;however,thetransientbehaviormustalsobeanalyzed.Inparticular,thetime-varyinginertiashaveaneectontheightdynamicsthatcanadverselyaectmissionperformanceifnotproperlycompensated.Theseinertiatermscausecouplingbetweenthelongitudinalandlateral-directionaldynamicsevenformaneuversaroundtrim.Asimulationofavariable-sweepaircraftundergoingasymmetric 17

PAGE 18

morphingforanaltitudechangeshowsanoticeablelateraltranslationintheightpathbecauseoftheinducedasymmetry. Theightdynamicsofmorphingaircraftmustbeanalyzedtoensureshape-changingtrajectorieshavethedesiredcharacteristics.Thetoolsfordescribingightdynamicsofxed-geometryaircraftarenotvalidfortime-varyingsystemssuchasmorphingaircraft.Thispaperintroducesamethodtorelatetheightdynamicsofmorphingaircraftbyinterpretingatime-varyingeigenvectorintermsofightmodes.Thetime-varyingeigenvectorisactuallydenedthroughadecompositionofthestate-transitionmatrixandthusdescribesanentireresponsethroughamorphingtrajectory.Avariable-sweepaircraftisanalyzedtodemonstratetheinformationthatisobtainedthroughthismethodandhowtheightdynamicsarealteredbythetime-varyingmorphing. Also,morphingvehicleshaveinherentlytime-varyingdynamicsduetothealterationoftheircongurations;consequently,thenumeroustechniquesforanalysisandcontroloftime-invariantsystemsareinappropriate.Therefore,acontrolschemeisintroducedthatdirectlyconsidersaconceptoftime-varyingpoletocommandmorphing.Theresultingtrajectoryminimizingtrackingerrorforeitherastateresponseorapoleresponse. 18

PAGE 19

CHAPTER1INTRODUCTION 1.1Motivation Miniatureairvehiclesareresourceswhosecharacteristics,suchassizeandspeed,enablearangeofmissionproles.Thesevehiclesareideallysuitedtooperatewithinurbanenvironmentsataltitudesthatareinaccessibletolargeraircraftduetodenseobstacles.Tasksincludingsurveillanceandtrackingwillbegreatlyfacilitatedbyvehiclesthatcanyattreetoplevelandintobuildings.Anillustrationofapossiblesurveillancemission,astraversedthroughanurbanenvironment,maybeseeninFig. 1-1 Figure1-1. Surveillancemissionthroughanurbanenvironment Agilityisincreasinglyrequiredforthesevehiclesasthemissiontasksconsidertheightconditionsassociatedwithurbanenvironments.Theclosespacingofobstacleswillrequireavehiclethatcanturnsharplyinasmallradiusbutyetloiterandcruise.Thewindsaroundtheseobstaclessignicantlyvaryindirectionwhichwillrequirethevehicletoincurlargeanglesofsidesliptomaintainsensorpointing.Thedurationforwhichthesensorismaintainedonthetargetiscrucialtocompletingmissionobjectivessuchaslaser-basedswathmapping[ 108 ]andvision-basedpathplanning[ 64 ],asshowninFig 1-2 19

PAGE 20

Figure1-2. Vision-basedpathplanning Suchdisparaterequirementsplaceconstraintsonthedesignwithinwhichasinglevehiclecannotlie.Therefore,morphingisbeingincorporatedtoenablemulti-rolecapabilitiesofasinglevehicle.Essentially,thevehiclechangesshapebyalteringparameters,suchasspanorcamber,duringight.Theresultingrangeofcongurationswillhaveanassociatedrangeofightdynamicsand,consequently,maneuvering. 1.2ProblemDescription BattleeldenvironmentshavepreviouslyservedasaperformancestageformanyprovencommercialgradeUAVs.TheseUAVsaretypicallylargerinsize,anddesignedprimarilyforsurveillancefromhigheraltitudes,relativetoitssmallercounterpart,theMAVorMiniatureAerialVehicle.ThelargerUAVsmaylacktheadvantageofsizeandmaneuverabilityovertheMAV,butsignicantlymake-upforthefactwiththeirtechnologicalreadinessformissioncapability,asshowninFig. 1-3 Modernavionics,andtheirrespectivesub-systems,haverecentlymadelargeadvancesinthereductionoftheiroverallweightandsize.Asaresult,MAVsarebeginningtobeoutttedwithmoresophisticatedsensorpackagesandcontrolsystems.Itshouldbenotedhowever,thatevenwiththeseadvances,thelargerUAVisstillsuperiortotheMAVintermsofbeingmissioncapable.Duetothefactofthistechnologicalgap,ithasbeensuggestedthataviancharacteristics,andtheireectivebenets,bestudied. 20

PAGE 21

Figure1-3. Readinessformissioncapability TwoMAVsutilizingtheconceptofwingmorphing,orshapechanging,(acommoncharacteristicofavianight)canbeshowninFig. 1-4 A B Figure1-4. MorphingMAVs:A)CapableofhorizontalmorphingB)Capableofverticalmorphing TheightdynamicsoftheaircraftshowninFig. 1-4 aresomewhatuniqueanddierentfromthosedenedforsymmetricxed-wingight.Withtheintroductionofmorphing,afewpreviouslymadeassumptionsmustnowbereconsidered.Itshouldbenotedthatmorphingchangesthesystemfromtime-invarianttotime-varying,andasaresult,introducesnewinertialtermsintothedynamics. 21

PAGE 22

Themomentsofinertiaofabodyobviouslyhaveaprofoundinuenceonthedynamicsandassociatedmotionofthatbody.Certainlyaerospacesystems,withmultipledegreesoffreedomfortranslationandrotation,mustproperlyaccountforinertiatoahighlevelofaccuracyinordertomodelthedynamics.Thetime-varyingaspectoftheseinertiasmustbeconsideredwithsimilaraccuracytonoteitsinuenceonthesystem. Someextensiveandrigorousevaluationsoftraditionalcausesoftime-varyinginertia,suchasfuelexpenditureandmulti-bodyrotation,havebeenperformedforspacesystems.Theeectsoftranslatingmasswithinaspacestationarederivedunderanassumptionofharmonicmotionandusedtocomputelibrationalstability[ 114 ].Movingmasswasalsoincludedinthedynamicsofavehiclewithasolarsailthatcouldmoveforcontrolpurposes[ 124 ].Thedynamicsandassociatedtime-varyinginertiawasmodeledforatwo-vehicleformationinwhichaCoulombtethercontrolledtherelativedistanceandmassdistribution[ 82 ].Anotherstudyoptimizedadesignforatwo-vehicleformationwithaexibleappendagewhosemotionalteredtheinertiaproperties[ 89 ].Theinuenceofthrusters,whichexpendmassthroughactivationandthusvarytheinertia,wasinvestigatedusingaformulationoffeedbackandfeedforwardtocanceltheeects[ 118 ].Thetime-varyinginertiaduetothrusterswascoupledwitheectsofuidsloshinginanotherexaminationofspacecraftdynamics[ 51 ]. Thesetraditionalcauseshavealsobeenexaminedwithrespecttotheireectsonaircraftalthoughnotnecessarilytothesamedegreeasspacecraft.Fuelburnisoftenneglectedsinceitstimeconstantisslowerthantheightdynamicsofmanyaircraft;however,thateectsontime-varyinginertiawereshownforthecaseofaerialrefuelinginwhichmasswasrapidlytransferredfromthetankertotherecipient[ 120 ].Onasmallerscale,thedynamicsofaapping-wingmicroairvehiclewerestudiedbynotingtheeectofwingmotion[ 121 ]. Theintroductionofmorphing,orshape-changingactuation,toanaircraftwillaltertheshapeandmassdistributionofthevehicle,andasaresult,producetime-varying 22

PAGE 23

inertias.Manystudiesintomorphingaircrafthavefocusedonthesteady-statebenetsofalteringacongurationforissuessuchasfuelconsumption[ 14 ],rangeandendurance[ 43 ],costandlogistics[ 15 ],actuatorenergy[ 93 ],maneuverability[ 99 ]andairfoilrequirements[ 103 ].Additionally,aeroelasticeectshavebeenoftenstudiedrelativetomaximumrollrate[ 66 44 9 ]andactuatorloads[ 77 ]. Morphinghasalsobeenintroducedtomicroairvehiclesforthepurposeofmanueveringcontrol[ 1 2 ].Specically,anaircraftisdesignedthatusesindependentwing-sweep,asshowninFig. 1-4 ,ofinboardandoutboardsectionsonboththerightandleftwings[ 46 ].Thataircraftisshowntousethemorphingforalteringtheaerodynamicsandachieveperformancemetricsrelatedtosensorpointing.Thewingsareabletosweepontheorderofasecond;consequently,thetemporalnatureofthemorphingmustbeconsidered. 1.3ProblemStatement Performanceofamorphingaircraftiscriticaltothesuccessofanymission;therefore,methodstoachievethisperformancemustbeconsidered.Designinganeectivecontrolschemeformorphingaircraftisanon-trivialtask,butcanbemademoreapparentbyrstunderstandingthesystemdynamics.Thedynamicperformanceoflinearsystemshaveclassicallybeenstudiedusingtime-invariantmethodssuchaseigenvalueandeigenvectoranalysis[ 97 ].Thisanalysishelpsdeterminesystemstabilityaswellasdynamicightmodes. Morphingcanbemodeledasatime-invariantsystemwithdiscretechanges[ 46 ],butisconsideredmoreaccuratewhenmodeledasatime-varyingsystem.Itiswellknown[ 127 ]thattime-invarianteigenvaluesprovidenoinformationabouttime-varyingstability.Asaresult,conceptsanalogoustotime-invarianteigenvaluesandeigenvectorshavebeendevelopedfortime-varyingsystems[ 59 86 126 130 131 127 ].Theparticularmethodologyforwhichtheseconceptsarederived,varybaseduponthesystemrepresentation.Oneapproachaddressesthenotionofpolesetsderivedfromadierentialequationwithtime-varyingcoecients[ 59 131 ].Anotherapproachaddressesthenotionofpolesets 23

PAGE 24

derivedbytransformingthestateequationintoanupper-triangularstateequation,viaastabilitypreservingvariablechange[ 86 ]. Thechallengeariseswhenconsideringmorphingasaplausiblecontrolscheme.Typically,anaircraftiscontrolledaboutitsaxesbycommandingadeection,fromrelativetrim,inoneofitsclassicallydenedcontrolsurfaces.Itisseenhowever,thatnocontrolsurfacesarepresentinavianight,yetmaneuveringisstilldoneeciently.Thisobservationcomesasadirectresultofwingmorphing,andthus,servesasaeldofinterestincontroldesign.Themainthoughtbeing,isitpossibletoeectivelycontrolanaircraftwithmorphing,andifitis,howdoyoudescribetheresultingtime-varyingeects? 1.3.1Contributions TheclassofsystemsunderinvestigationcanberepresentedasinEquation 1{1 .Thisformdescribesasystemwithnxstatesalongwithnmorphingactuatorsandnutraditionalactuatorssuchthatx2Rnxisthestatevector,2Rnisthecommandtomorphing,andu2Rnuisthecommandtotraditionalcontrolsurfaces.ThecoecientsintheequationsofmotionarecombinedintoA2RnxnxandB2Rnxnuwhicharefunctionsofboththemorphingconguration,,andtheightcondition,. _x=A(;)x+B(;)u(1{1) Thisresearchhasresultedinthedevelopment,building,andtestingofinnovativeandtheoreticaladvancementsusedtoaddressthechallengesrelatedtotime-varyingmorphingaircraft.Asetofsolutionsareoutlinedinthedissertationtoaddressthisnovelapproachdevelopedforsystemsanalysisandcontrolsynthesis.Theresultingapproachhasresultedinthefollowingspeciccontributions. MorphingAircraft { Amorphingplatformwasdesignedsuchthatactuationofanindependentmulti-joint,asymmetricwingwasmadepossible. { Missionperformancewasevaluatedforthisaircraftthroughsimulationandighttesting. 24

PAGE 25

Time-VaryingInertias { Retainedallinertialtermsintheequationsofmotiontostudytheirtime-varyingeectswithinmorphingightdynamics. { Theresultingtime-varyinginertialeectswerecharacterizedandparamterizedbasedontheirinuencewithinthemodalstructureoftheightdynamics. Time-varyingFlightDynamics { Interpretationsweredevelopedforthetime-varyingpolesandmodalcharacteristicsofamorphingaircraft. { Theseinterpretationswerecompletedusingtwodierentmethodologiespreviouslyuntestedfortime-varyingightdynamics. MorphingControl { Aframeworkforlinearinput-varyingsystemswasformulatedtoaccountforavarietyofsystemswhosedynamicsaredependentinasetofcontroleectors. { Developedandsynthesizedoptimalfeedforwardtrackingfordesiredtime-varyingpolesandsignals. { Developedandsynthesizedoptimalfeedbackforaspeciccaseoftime-varyingsystem.Thissystemwasredenedinabilineartime-invariantformwherenoinputmatrixwasavailableforcontrolpurposes. 1.3.2Papers ThecontributionslistedinSection 1.3.1 haveresultedinmultiplepublicationsincludingjournalpapers,conferencepapers,andabookchapter,aswellas,televisiondocumentariesandaU.S.patent.Thesepublications,alongwiththedocumentariesandpatent,arelistedasfollows: BookChapter 1. D.T.Grant,S.Sorley,A.Chakravarthy,R.Lind,"FlightDynamicsofMorphingAircraftwithTime-VaryingInertias,"inMorphingVehiclesandStructures:AnAerospacePerspective,editedbyJ.Valasek,Wiley[Acceptedforpublication,scheduledforreleaseJanuary2011] JournalPapers 25

PAGE 26

2. D.T.Grant,M.AbdulrahimandR.Lind,"DesignandAnalysisofBiomimeticJointsforMorphingofMicroAirVehicles,"InternationalJournalofMicroAirVehicles,[Accepted]. 3. D.T.Grant,M.AbdulrahimandR.Lind,"FlightDynamicsofaMorphingAircraftUtilizingIndependentMultiple-JointWingSweep,"BioinspirationandBiomimetics,[Accepted]. 4. A.Chakravarthy,D.T.GrantandR.Lind,"Time-VaryingDynamicsofMicroAirVehicleWithVariable-SweepMorphing,"JournalofGuidance,Control,andDynamics,[InReview]. 5. D.T.GrantandR.Lind,"OptimalFeedbackControlforTime-VaryingMorphingAircraft,"[FutureWorkinProgress]. ConferencePapers 6. D.T.Grant,M.AbdulrahimandR.Lind,"FlightDynamicsofaMorphingAircraftUtilizingIndependentMultiple-JointWingSweep,"AIAAAtmosphericFlightMechanicsConference,Keystone,CO,August2006,AIAA-2006-6505.[BestStudentPaper] 7. D.T.Grant,M.AbdulrahimandR.Lind,"EnhancingMissionCapabilityforMicroAirVehiclesusingBiomimeticJointsandStructures,"AustralianInternationalAerospaceCongress,Melbourne,Australia,March2007,accepted. 8. D.T.Grant,M.AbdulrahimandR.Lind,"TheRoleofMorphingtoEnhanceMissionCapabilityofMicroAirVehicles,"WorldForumonSmartMaterialsandSmartStructuresTechnology,invitedpaper,ChongqingandNanjing,China,May2007. 9. D.T.Grant,M.AbdulrahimandR.Lind,"AnInvestigationofBiologically-InspiredJointstoEnableSensorPointingofMorphingMicroAirVehicles,"Interna-tionalForumonAeroelasticityandStructuralDynamics,Stockholm,Sweden,June2007,IF-069. 10. D.T.GrantandR.Lind,"EectsofTime-VaryingInertiasonFlightDynamicsofanAsymmetricVariable-SweepMorphingAircraft,"AIAAAtmosphericFlightMechanicsConference,HiltonHead,SC,August2007,AIAA-2007-6487. 11. D.T.Grant,A.ChakravarthyandR.Lind,"ModalInterpretationofTime-VaryingEigenvectorsofMorphingAircraft,"AIAAAtmosphericFlightMechanicsCon-ference,Chicago,IL,AIAA-2009-5848. 12. D.T.GrantandR.Lind,"OptimalTrackingofTime-VaryingModesForControlofMorphingAircraft,"AIAAGuidance,Navigation,andControlConference,Toronto,ON,Canada,August2010,AIAA-2010-8203. 26

PAGE 27

13. A.Chakravarthy,D.T.GrantandR.Lind,"Time-VaryingDynamicsofaMicroAirVehiclewithVariable-SweepMorphing,"AIAAGuidance,NavigationandControlConference,Chicago,IL,August2009,AIAA-2009-6304. TelevisionDocumentariesandFilms 14. "FlyingMosters3D":Sky3DTVDocumentary(3DImaxFeatureFilm)[AiredDecember2010] 15. "MorphingMAV":NationalGeographicChannel(5minutesegmentonMadLab)[FirstAired:Apr2008] 16. "BirdWingsforAircraft":VPRO-publictelevisioninTheNetherlands(25minutesegmentonCopyCats)[FirstAired:Dec2006] 17. "TheMagicofMotion":PBS(20minutesegmentonNatureTechDocumentary)[FirstAired:Nov2006] 18. "MorphingMAV":ScienceChannel(5minutesegmentonDiscoveriesThisWeek)[FirstAired:Jul2006] 19. "Biologically-InspiredMorphingMAV":DiscoveryChannel(5minutesegmentonBeyondTomorrow)[FirstAired:May2006] 20. "MorphingMAV":DiscoveryChannel(5minutesegmentonDailyPlanet)[FirstAired:Oct2005] Patent 21. MorphingAircraft:USPatentApplicationSerialNumberPCT/US09/54917 Thepublicationslistedabovearederivedfromcertainsectionsofthisdissertation.Relationshipsbetweenthesetopics,dissertationsections,andresultingpublicationscanbefoundinTable 1-1 Table1-1. Publicationsresultingfromresearch TopicDissertationSectionWork PlatformDesign 6.1 6.3 1. 2. 3. 6. 7. 8. 9. Time-VaryingInertias 2.1 2.6 6.4 10. Time-VaryingFlightDynamics 3.1 3.6 4.1 4.4 4. 11. 13. OptimalFeedforwardControl 5.1 5.4 12. OptimalFeedbackControl 5.1 5. 27

PAGE 28

1.4DissertationOverview Chapter1introducesthefollowingdocumentbystrategicallyaddressingthekeyissuesdirectlyrelatedtothedissertation'smaintopicofresearch.Theseissuesarewrittenintosectionsbasedupontheircontributiontotheoverallunderstandingoftheproblembeingconsidered.Sectiontopicsinclude:motivationforconductingresearch,abackgrounddescriptionoftheproblem,andastatementformallydeningtheactualproblem. Chapter2beginsbyrecallingthetraditionalderivationandlinearizationofthenonlinearaircraftequationsofmotion.Theseaircraftequationsofmotionarethenlaterrederived,andlinearized,basedupontheassumptionthatthesystemistime-varying(aresultofmorphing).Thischapterisconcludedbyexaminingtwoexampleswhereboththesymmetricandasymmetricmorphingequationsofmotionarereducedtothetraditionallydenedequationsofmotion,asdescribedpreviouslyinthechapter. Chapter3updatesthereaderwiththemostinuentialmethodsindeningthepolesandzerosforalineartime-varyingsystem.Thefourmost-commonapproachesandtheirmethodsaregiven,eachincludingabriefdescriptionofbackgroundtheoryanddenitions.Thestabilityofeachmethodisalsoconsidered,therefore,necessaryandsucientconditionspertainingtodierentlevelsofstabilityaredened. Chapter4beginsbyreviewingthefundamentalframeworksusedtointerpretbothtime-invariantandtime-varyingsystemcharacterisitcs.Theresultingtime-varyingframeworkisthenfurtherinvestigatedfortwoofthefourmethodologiesdescribedinChapter3.Chapter4closesbyprovidingatime-varyingexamplespecictotheframeworkpreviouslymention. Chapter5motivesthederivationofasystematicapproachtoclassifyingandcontrollingthetime-varyingsystemproducedbymorphing.Morphingcontrolchallangesandapproachesaredecribedandthenfollowedbyexamplesoutliningcertainapproaches.Bothstabilizingandoptimizingperformanceareconsideredthroughtheoreticalderivationandthenimplementation.Thechatpterconcludeswithafutureworksectionwhichexpandsthepreviousworkintopossibleavenuesforfutureworkandproposestheoreticalderivations. Chapter6presentsanextensiveexamplewhichinvestigatestheeectsofbothsymmetricandasymmetricmorphing.Generatedstate-spacesystemsareusedtosimulatebasiclineartime-invariant(quasi-static)controlledmaneuverssuchasdivingandturning,aswellas,theeectsoftime-varyingmorphingonthesystem'smodalcharacterisiticsandcontrollability. 28

PAGE 29

CHAPTER2EQUATIONSOFMOTION 2.1AircraftAxisSystem Threeaxissystemsarecommontodescribeaircraftmotion.Thesesystemsincludethebody-axissystem(xedtotheaircraft),theEarth-axissystem(assumedtobeaninertialaxissystemxedtotheEarth),andthestability-axissystem(denedwithrespecttothelocalwind). 2.1.1BodyAxisSystem Thebody-xedcoordinatesystemhasitsoriginlocatedattheaircraft'scenterofgravity.Theaxesareorientedsuchthat^xB,pointsdirectlyoutthenose,^yB,pointsdirectlyouttherightwing,and^zB,pointsdirectlyoutthebottom,asshowninFigure 2-1 Figure2-1. Body-FixedCoordinateFrame 2.1.2StabilityAxisSystem Thestabilityaxissystemsharesthesameoriginlocationasthebody-xedframe,butisrotatedrelativetothebody-xedaxistoalignwiththevelocityvector,asshowninFigure 2-2 .Theresulting^xSaxispointsinthedirectionoftheprojectionoftherelativewindontothexzplaneoftheaircraft.The^ySaxisisoutoftherightwingcoincidentwith^yB,whilethe^zSaxispointsdownwardinthedirectioncompletingthevectorsetdescribedbytheright-handruleandshowninFigure 2-2 29

PAGE 30

Figure2-2. StabilityCoordinateFrame 2.1.3EarthAxisSystem TheEarth-xedcoordinatesystemisxedtothesurfaceoftheEarthwithits^zEaxispointingtothecenteroftheEarth.The^xEand^yEaxesareorthogonalandlieinthelocalhorizontalplane,asshowninFigure 2-3 Figure2-3. Earth-FixedCoordinateFrame 30

PAGE 31

2.2CoordinateTransformations 2.2.1EarthtoBodyFrame AvectormaybetransformedfromtheEarth-xedframeintothebody-xedframebythreeconsectutiveconsecutiverotationsaboutthez-axis,y-axis,andx-axis,respectively.TraditionalightmechanicsdenetheanglesthroughwhichthesecoordinateframesarerelativelyrotatedastheEulerangles.TheEuleranglesareexpressedasyaw ,pitch,androll,anditisimportanttonotethataparticularsequenceofEuleranglerotationsisunique.Thefollowingillustratesthetransformationofavector,PE,intheEarth-xedframe,asdenedinEquation 2{1 ,intothebody-xedframe. PE=x^iE+y^jE+z^kE=266664XEYEZE377775(2{1) Therstrotationisthroughtheangleaboutthevector^kE,asshowninFigure 2-4 Figure2-4. Rotationthrough Therotationabout^kEbytheangle, ,isreferredtoasR3( ),whereR3( )istheshort-handnotationusedtodescribetherotationmatrixdenedinEquation 2{2 31

PAGE 32

266664X1Y1Z1377775=266664cos sin 0)]TJ /F1 11.955 Tf 11.3 0 Td[(sin cos 0001377775266664XEYEZE377775(2{2) Thesecondrotationisthroughtheangleaboutthevector^j1=^j2,asshowninFigure 2-5 Figure2-5. Rotationthrough Therotationabout^j1bytheangle,,isreferredtoasR2(),whereR2()istheshort-handnotationusedtodescribetherotationmatrixdenedinEquation 2{3 266664X2Y2Z2377775=266664cos0)]TJ /F1 11.955 Tf 11.29 0 Td[(sin010sin0cos377775266664X1Y1Z1377775(2{3) Thethirdandnalrotationisthroughtheangleaboutthevector^i2=^i,asshowninFigure 2-6 Therotationabout^i2bytheangle,,isreferredtoasR1(),whereR1()istheshort-handnotationusedtodescribetherotationmatrixdenedinEquation 2{4 32

PAGE 33

Figure2-6. Rotationthrough 266664XBYBZB377775=2666641000cossin0)]TJ /F1 11.955 Tf 11.3 0 Td[(sincos377775266664X2Y2Z2377775(2{4) Therefore,anyvectorintheEarth-xedframe,PE,canbetransformedintothebody-xedframe,PB,usingtherelationshipdenedinEquation 2{5 PB=R1()R2()R3( )PE(2{5) Forexample,Earth-xedgravityforcescanbeexpressedinthebody-xedcoordinatesystembyimplementingEquation 2{5 ontheEarth-xedweightvector FGE=26666400mg377775E=266664)]TJ /F5 11.955 Tf 9.3 0 Td[(mgsinmgsincosmgcossin377775B(2{6) 2.2.2StabilitytoBodyFrame Typically,aerodynamicforcesaredenedbythestabilityaxisforconvenienceyet,forcomputationalreasons,theyneedtobedenedbythebody-xedaxis.Recallingthatthistransformationcanbeaccomplishedbyrotatingthestabilityaxisthroughapositiveangleofattack,thetransformationfromthestabilitycoordinateframetothebody-xed 33

PAGE 34

coordinateframeissimplyarotationaboutthevector^yBthroughtheangle,asdenedinEquation 2{7 266664FAxFAyFAz377775B=266664cos0)]TJ /F1 11.955 Tf 11.29 0 Td[(sin010sin0cos377775266664)]TJ /F5 11.955 Tf 9.29 0 Td[(DFAy)]TJ /F5 11.955 Tf 9.29 0 Td[(L377775S(2{7) 2.3NonlinearEquationsofMotion 2.3.1DynamicEquations TherigidbodyequationsofmotionareobtainedformNewton'ssecondlaw,whichstatesthatthesummationofallexternalforcesactingonabodyisequaltothetimerateofchangeofthemomentumofthebody;andthesummationoftheexternalmomentsactingonthebodyisequaltothetimerateofchangeofthemomentofmomentum(angularmomentum).ThetimeratesofchangeoflinearandangularmomentumarerelativetoaninertialorNewtonianreferenceframe(Earth-xedframe).Newton'ssecondlawcanbeexpressedbythevectorsdenedinEquations 2{8 2{9 XF=d dt(mv)E(2{8) XM=d dtHE(2{9) 2.3.1.1Forceequations Afewadditionalassumptionsmustbemadeinordertodeveloptheright-handside,orresponseside,ofequation 2{8 .Theseassumptionsincludethattheaircraftbeconsideredarigidbody,andthatthemassoftheaircraftremainconstant.Asaresultofassumingthemasstobeconstant,themassterm,seeninEquation 2{8 ,canbemovedoutsideofthetimederivativeandredenedasEquation 2{10 34

PAGE 35

XF=md dtvE=maE(2{10) Theaccelerationofanaircraftisnormallymeasuredinthebody-xedframe,therefore,touseEquation 2{10 ,thebody-xedaccelerationmustbetransformedintotheEarth-xedframe.Itisnotedthatsincethetransformationinvolvesarotationofcoordinates,anyvectorinthebody-xedframecanbecalculatedintheEarth-xedframebyusingthetransporttheorem[ 95 ],asseeninEquation 2{11 .Itshouldalsobenotedthatforthefollowingderivations,allofthevectorswillbeexpressedinthebody-xedcoordinatesystem,denotedbythesubscript,B,unlessotherwisestated.Forexample,thevelocityvectorasseenbyanobserverintheEarth-xedframe,expressedinthebody-xedcoordinatesystem,willbedontedasvEB. db dtA=db dtB+A!Bb(2{11) Thevelocityvector,vE,representstherateofchangeofthepositionvector,r,asviewedbyanobserverintheEarthxedreferenceframe.Sincethepositionvector,r,isnormallymeasuredwithrespecttothebody-xedcoordinatesystem,itmustbersttransformedintotheEarth-xedframe,inordertocomputethedesiredEarth-denedvelocityvector,VEB.Thus,thetransporttheoremisusedtorelatethepositionvector,r,totheEarth-denedvelocityvector,vEB,asseeninasseeninEquation 2{12 vEB=dr dtE=dr dtB+E!Br(2{12) TheEarth-denedveloctyvectorcanbeconvenientlyrewrittenanddened,asseeninEquation 2{13 35

PAGE 36

vEB=u^i+v^j+w^k=266664UVW377775EB(2{13) ThesttermontherightsideofEquation 2{12 iscalledthebody-denedvelocity.Thebody-denedvelocityvector,vBB,issimplythetimederivativeofthepositionvector,r,asseeninEquation 2{14 .Notethatthisisonlythecasewhenthepositionvectorisdescribedbythebody-xedcoordinatesystem. dr dtB=_x^i+y^j+_z^k=vBB(2{14) ThesecondtermontherightsideofEquation 2{12 ,isdescribedbythecrossproductbetweentheEarth-denedvelocityvector,vEBandatermcalledtheangularvelocityvector.Theangularvelocityvector,E!B,describestheangularvelocityofreferenceframeB(body-xedframe)asviewedbyanobserverinreferenceframeE(Earthxedframe),representedinthebody-xedcoordinatesystem. Theangularveloctyvectorcanbeconvenientlyrewrittenanddened,asseeninEquation 2{15 B!E=p^i+q^j+r^k=266664_p_q_r377775EB(2{15) Itshouldbenoted,thattheangularvelocityvectors,E!BandB!E,arerelatedthroughasimplerelationship,asseeninEquation 2{16 E!B=)]TJ /F11 7.97 Tf 9.3 4.94 Td[(B!E(2{16) Itshouldalsobenoted,thatangularvelocityvectorsrelatingmultiplerotations,maybelinearlyaddedintooneangularvelocityvectorthatrelatestheentiretransformation. 36

PAGE 37

Thisadditionofangularvelocityvectorscanbedescribedbytheangularvelocityadditiontheorem[ 95 ],whichisshowninEquation 2{17 A1!An=A1!A2+A2!A3+:::+An)]TJ /F15 5.978 Tf 5.75 0 Td[(1!An(2{17) ThederivationoftheEarth-denedaccelerationvector,aEB,issimilartothepreviousdenitionoftheEarth-denedvelocityvector,vEB.Thatis,theEarth-denedaccelerationvector,aEB,representstherateofchangeoftheEarth-denedvelocityvector,vEB,asviewedbyanobserverintheEarth-xedreferenceframe.Therefore,tosolvefortheaccelerationvector,aEB,thetransporttheoremmustbeappliedtothevelocityvector,vEB,asseeninEquation 2{18 aEB=dvEB dtE=dvEB dtB+E!BvEB(2{18) TheEarth-denedaccelerationvectorcanbeconvenientlyrewrittenanddened,asseeninEquation 2{19 aEB=u^i+v^j+w^k=266664_u_v_w377775B(2{19) NoticethatifthesttermontherightsideofEquation 2{19 isdenedbythebody-xedcoordinatesystem,thenonlythetimederivativeneedstobetaken.Ifthistermisnotdenedbythebody-xedcoordinatesystem,thenthetransporttheoremmustbeappliedtocompensateforthecoordinatechange. TherighthandsideofEquation 2{19 cannowbesolvedforbyrstcomputingthecrossproductbetweentheEarth-denedangularvelocityvector,B!E,andtheEarth-denedvelocityvector,vEB.Thecrossproductisthenaddedtothebody-denedaccelerationvector,aBB.Itshouldnotedthatthebody-denedaccelerationisnotsimplythesecondderivativeoftheofthebody-denedposition.Thistermisdenedastherate 37

PAGE 38

ofchangeoftheEarth-denedvelocityvector,asseenbyanobserverinthebody-xedframe,andtherefore,canbecomputedbytakingthetimederivativeoftheEarth-denedvelocityvector. Theresultingterm,showninEquation 2{20 ,representstheaccelerationoftheaircraftasseenbyanobserverintheinertially-xedEarthframe,representedinthebody-xedcoordinatesystem. aB=266664_u+qw)]TJ /F5 11.955 Tf 11.96 0 Td[(rv_v+ru)]TJ /F5 11.955 Tf 11.95 0 Td[(pw_w+pv)]TJ /F5 11.955 Tf 11.95 0 Td[(qu377775B(2{20) Todenethelefthandside,orappliedforceside,ofEquation 2{8 ,itisrstassumedthatonlythemostsignicantforcesaectthemotionoftheaircraft.Theappliedforcescanthenbebrokendownintovectorcomponentsandarrangedinamannersuchthattheyaredenedbythevector,FEB,asseeninEquation 2{21 FEB=266664FxFyFz377775EB=266664FGx+FAxFGy+FAyFGz+FAz377775EB=XF(2{21) Aresultingsetoffull-order,nonlinearforceequations,asseeninEquation 2{22 ,canbederivedbyinsertingEquations 2{20 2{21 intoEquation 2{8 andrecallingthattheappliedforcesaregivenbyEquations 2{6 2{7 m(_u+qw)]TJ /F5 11.955 Tf 11.96 0 Td[(rv)=)]TJ /F5 11.955 Tf 9.3 0 Td[(mgsin+()]TJ /F5 11.955 Tf 9.3 0 Td[(Dcos+Lsin)m(_v+ru)]TJ /F5 11.955 Tf 11.96 0 Td[(pw)=mgsincos+FAym(_w+pv)]TJ /F5 11.955 Tf 11.96 0 Td[(qu)=mgcoscos+()]TJ /F5 11.955 Tf 9.29 0 Td[(Dsin)]TJ /F5 11.955 Tf 11.96 0 Td[(Lcos)(2{22) 38

PAGE 39

2.3.1.2Momentequations Itisshowninequation 2{2 thatNewton'ssecondlawissatisedbyequatingthesummationofmomentstothetotalrateofchangeofthemomentofmomentum(angularmomentum).ThesamerelationshipusedpreviouslytodenetheEarth-denedaccelerationcanbeusedtodenetheEarth-denedangularmomentum.Itshouldbeagainnotedthatforthefollowingderivations,allofthevectorswillbeexpressedinthebody-xedcoordinatesystem,denotedbythesubscript,B,unlessotherwisestated.Forexample,theangularmomentumvectorasseenbyanobserverintheEarth-xedframe,expressedinthebody-xedcoordinatesystem,willbedontedasHEB. Traditionally,theangularmomentumiscomputedfrommeasurementstakeninthebody-xedcoordinatesysytem.InordertoproperlydescribetheEarth-denedangularmomentumvector,itmustbersttransformedintotheinertially-xedEarthframe.Thistransformationcanbeaccomplishedbythetransporttheorem,asseeninEquation 2{23 dHEB dtE=dHEB dtB+E!BHEB(2{23) Thegeneralexpressionforangularmomentumcanbetakendirectlyfrombasicphysicsanddescribedasanobject'sinertialtensor,I,multipliedbythatobject'sangularratevector,!,asseeninEquation 2{24 H=I!(2{24) TheangularmomentumdenedinEquation 2{24 canbemaderelavanttoanaircraftbydeningtheinertialtensorintheaircraft'sbody-xedcoordinatesystem,asseeninEquation 2{25 ,andrecallingthattheEarth-denedangularvelocityvectorwaspreviouslydenedinEquation 2{15 39

PAGE 40

IB=266664Ixx)]TJ /F5 11.955 Tf 9.3 0 Td[(Ixy)]TJ /F5 11.955 Tf 9.3 0 Td[(Ixz)]TJ /F5 11.955 Tf 9.3 0 Td[(IyxIyy)]TJ /F5 11.955 Tf 9.3 0 Td[(Iyz)]TJ /F5 11.955 Tf 9.3 0 Td[(Ixz)]TJ /F5 11.955 Tf 9.3 0 Td[(IyzIzz377775B(2{25) Equations 2{15 and 2{25 canbeinsertedintoEquation 2{24 toproducetheEarth-denedangularmomentumvector,asseeninEquation 2{26 HEB=266664Ixx)]TJ /F5 11.955 Tf 9.3 0 Td[(Ixy)]TJ /F5 11.955 Tf 9.3 0 Td[(Ixz)]TJ /F5 11.955 Tf 9.3 0 Td[(IyxIyy)]TJ /F5 11.955 Tf 9.3 0 Td[(Iyz)]TJ /F5 11.955 Tf 9.3 0 Td[(Ixz)]TJ /F5 11.955 Tf 9.3 0 Td[(IyzIzz377775EB266664PQR377775EB(2{26) TheEarth-denedangularmomentumvector,HEB,canbeconvenientlywritteninvectornotation,asseeninEquation 2{27 HEB=Hx^i+Hy^j+Hz^k=266664HxHyHz377775EB(2{27) InsertingEquation 2{27 intothelefthandsideofEquation 2{26 andcarryingoutthematrixmultiplicationontherighthandside,resultsintheEarth-denedvectornotationoftheaircraft'sangularmomentum,asseeninEquation 2{28 HEB=266664pIx)]TJ /F5 11.955 Tf 11.95 0 Td[(qIxy)]TJ /F5 11.955 Tf 11.96 0 Td[(rIxzqIy)]TJ /F5 11.955 Tf 11.95 0 Td[(rIz)]TJ /F5 11.955 Tf 11.95 0 Td[(pIxyrIz)]TJ /F5 11.955 Tf 11.96 0 Td[(pIxz)]TJ /F5 11.955 Tf 11.95 0 Td[(qIyz377775(2{28) Themomentsofineritaaredescibedasindicatorstotheresistancetorotationaboutthataxis,asdenedinEquations 2{29 2{31 .Therefore,Ixindicatestheresistancetorotationaboutthex-axis(relativelydened).Theproductsofinertiaaredescribedasindicatorstothesymmetryoftheaircraft,asdenedinEquations 2{32 2{34 40

PAGE 41

Ix=Z(y2+z2)dm (2{29) Iy=Z(x2+z2)dm (2{30) Iz=Z(x2+y2)dm (2{31) Ixy=Z(xy)dm (2{32) Ixz=Z(xz)dm (2{33) Iyz=Z(yz)dm (2{34) Duetothefactthatthemasseswereassumedtobepointmasses,theintegralsinEquations 2{29 2{34 canbereducedto: Ix=m(y2+z2) (2{35) Iy=m(x2+z2) (2{36) Iz=m(x2+y2) (2{37) Ixy=m(xy) (2{38) Ixz=m(xz) (2{39) Iyz=m(yz) (2{40) ThecorrespondinginertialratescanbecalculatedbytakingthetimederivativeofEquations 2{35 2{40 ,asshowninEquationrefeqrates. 41

PAGE 42

_Ix=m[(2y)(_y)+(2z)(_z)]_Iy=m[(2x)(_x)+(2z)(_z)]_Iz=m[(2x)(_x)+(2y)(_y)]_Ixy=)]TJ /F5 11.955 Tf 9.29 0 Td[(m[(x)(_y)+(y)(_x)]_Ixz=)]TJ /F5 11.955 Tf 9.3 0 Td[(m[(x)(_z)+(z)(_x)]_Iyz=)]TJ /F5 11.955 Tf 9.3 0 Td[(m[(y)(_z)+(z)(_y)](2{41) Thersttermontherighthandsideofequation 2{23 isdescribedastherateofchangeoftheEarth-denedangularmomentumvectorasseenbyanoberverinthebody-xedcoordinatesystem,representedinthebody-xedcoordinatesystem.ThistermcanbefoundbysimplytakingthetimederivativeofEquation 2{28 ,asseeninEquation 2{42 dHEB dt=266664_pIx)]TJ /F1 11.955 Tf 14.12 0 Td[(_qIxy)]TJ /F1 11.955 Tf 13.78 0 Td[(_rIxz+p_Ix)]TJ /F5 11.955 Tf 11.96 0 Td[(q_Ixy)]TJ /F5 11.955 Tf 11.96 0 Td[(r_Ixz_qIy)]TJ /F1 11.955 Tf 13.78 0 Td[(_rIyz)]TJ /F1 11.955 Tf 14.24 0 Td[(_pIxy+q_Iy)]TJ /F5 11.955 Tf 11.95 0 Td[(r_Iz)]TJ /F5 11.955 Tf 11.96 0 Td[(p_Ixy_rIz)]TJ /F1 11.955 Tf 14.24 0 Td[(_pIxz)]TJ /F1 11.955 Tf 14.11 0 Td[(_qIyz+_rIz)]TJ /F5 11.955 Tf 11.96 0 Td[(p_Ixz)]TJ /F5 11.955 Tf 11.95 0 Td[(q_Iyz377775(2{42) ThesecondtermontherightsideofEquation 2{23 canbefoundbytakingthecrossproductbetweenthepreviouslydenedangularmomentumvector,HEB,asseeninEquation 2{28 ,andtheangularvelocityvector,!EB,asseeninEquation 2{19 .Thistermcanbethentemporarilydenedas,HT,andrewrittenintheformshownbyEquation 2{43 HT=266664qrIz)]TJ /F5 11.955 Tf 11.95 0 Td[(qpIxz)]TJ /F5 11.955 Tf 11.95 0 Td[(q2Iyz)]TJ /F5 11.955 Tf 11.96 0 Td[(qrIy+r2Iyz+rpIxyrpIx)]TJ /F5 11.955 Tf 11.95 0 Td[(qrIxy)]TJ /F5 11.955 Tf 11.95 0 Td[(r2Ixz)]TJ /F5 11.955 Tf 11.96 0 Td[(rpIz+p2Ixz+qpIyzpqIy)]TJ /F5 11.955 Tf 11.96 0 Td[(rpIyz)]TJ /F5 11.955 Tf 11.96 0 Td[(p2Ixy)]TJ /F5 11.955 Tf 11.95 0 Td[(pqIx+q2Ixy+rqIxz377775(2{43) TherightsideofEquation 2{23 cannowbesolvedforintermsoftheEarth-denedangularmomentumvector,HEB,byinsertingEquations 2{42 and 2{43 intoEquation 2{23 ,asseeninEquation 2{44 42

PAGE 43

HEB=266664_pIx)]TJ /F1 11.955 Tf 14.11 0 Td[(_qIxy)]TJ /F1 11.955 Tf 13.78 0 Td[(_rIxz+p_Ix)]TJ /F5 11.955 Tf 11.95 0 Td[(q_Ixy)]TJ /F5 11.955 Tf 11.95 0 Td[(r_Ixz_qIy)]TJ /F1 11.955 Tf 13.78 0 Td[(_rIyz)]TJ /F1 11.955 Tf 14.24 0 Td[(_pIxy+q_Iy)]TJ /F5 11.955 Tf 11.96 0 Td[(r_Iz)]TJ /F5 11.955 Tf 11.96 0 Td[(p_Ixy_rIz)]TJ /F1 11.955 Tf 14.24 0 Td[(_pIxz)]TJ /F1 11.955 Tf 14.11 0 Td[(_qIyz+_rIz)]TJ /F5 11.955 Tf 11.96 0 Td[(p_Ixz)]TJ /F5 11.955 Tf 11.96 0 Td[(q_Iyz377775+266664qrIz)]TJ /F5 11.955 Tf 11.96 0 Td[(qpIxz)]TJ /F5 11.955 Tf 11.96 0 Td[(q2Iyz)]TJ /F5 11.955 Tf 11.95 0 Td[(qrIy+r2Iyz+rpIxyrpIx)]TJ /F5 11.955 Tf 11.96 0 Td[(qrIxy)]TJ /F5 11.955 Tf 11.96 0 Td[(r2Ixz)]TJ /F5 11.955 Tf 11.95 0 Td[(rpIz+p2Ixz+qpIyzpqIy)]TJ /F5 11.955 Tf 11.95 0 Td[(rpIyz)]TJ /F5 11.955 Tf 11.96 0 Td[(p2Ixy)]TJ /F5 11.955 Tf 11.96 0 Td[(pqIx+q2Ixy+rqIxz377775(2{44) TheleftsideofEquation 2{44 canbeputintovectornotation,suchthatthevectorcomponentsoftheEarth-denedangularmomentumvector,HEB,aredenedbyindividualmomentterms,asshownbyEquation 2{45 .` dH dtEB=266664LMN377775EB(2{45) Afull-ordersetofnonlinearmomentequationscanbefoundbyrstinsertingEquation 2{45 intoEquation 2{44 andthenequatingsides,asseeninEquation 2{46 L=_pIx)]TJ /F5 11.955 Tf 11.96 0 Td[(qrIy+qrIz+(pr)]TJ /F1 11.955 Tf 14.11 0 Td[(_q)Ixy)]TJ /F1 11.955 Tf 11.95 0 Td[((pq+_r)Ixz+(r2)]TJ /F5 11.955 Tf 11.96 0 Td[(q2)Iyz+p_Ix)]TJ /F5 11.955 Tf 11.96 0 Td[(q_Ixy)]TJ /F5 11.955 Tf 11.96 0 Td[(r_IxzM=prIx+_qIy)]TJ /F5 11.955 Tf 11.96 0 Td[(prIz)]TJ /F1 11.955 Tf 11.95 0 Td[((qr)]TJ /F1 11.955 Tf 14.24 0 Td[(_p)Ixy+(p2)]TJ /F5 11.955 Tf 11.95 0 Td[(r2)Ixz+(pq)]TJ /F1 11.955 Tf 13.78 0 Td[(_r)Iyz+q_Iy)]TJ /F5 11.955 Tf 11.96 0 Td[(p_Ixy)]TJ /F5 11.955 Tf 11.96 0 Td[(r_IyzN=)]TJ /F5 11.955 Tf 9.3 0 Td[(pqIx+pqIy+_rIz+(q2)]TJ /F5 11.955 Tf 11.95 0 Td[(p2)Ixy+(qr)]TJ /F1 11.955 Tf 14.24 0 Td[(_p)Ixz)]TJ /F1 11.955 Tf 11.96 0 Td[((pr+_q)Iyz+r_Iz)]TJ /F5 11.955 Tf 11.95 0 Td[(p_Ixz)]TJ /F5 11.955 Tf 11.95 0 Td[(q_Iyz(2{46) 2.3.2KinematicEquations Thesixequationsofmotion,previouslydevelopedtorepresenttheforcesandmomentsactingontheaircraft,arenecessarybutnotsucient.Additionalequationsmustbeaddedinordertosolvetheoverallaircraftproblem.TheseadditionalequationsarenecessaryduetothefactthattheEuleranglesrepresentedintheforceequationscreatemorethansixunknowns. 2.3.2.1Orientationequations Threenewequationscanbeobtainedbyrelatingthethreebody-axissystemrates(p;q;r)tothethreeEulerrates(_ ;_;_).Itisnotedthatthisrelationshipcan 43

PAGE 44

beillustratedbyavectorequationwherethemagnitudeofthethreebodyratesequalsthethreeEulerratesand,asseeninEquation 2{47 !B=p^i+q^j+r^k=_ i+_j+_k(2{47) Toequatebothsidesofequation 2{24 ,itisnecessarythatbothvectorsarerepresentedinthesamecoordinateframe.Thus,bytransformingtheEuleranglesintothebody-xedcoordinatesystem,threenonlinearbodyrateequationscanbewritten,asseeninEquation 2{48 p=_)]TJ /F1 11.955 Tf 15.65 3.16 Td[(_ sinq=_cos+_ cossinr=_ coscos)]TJ /F1 11.955 Tf 14.2 3.15 Td[(_sin(2{48) ThesethreebodyrateequationcanalsobedenedintermsoftheEulerangles,asseeninEquation 2{49 _=p+q(sin+rcos)tan_=qcos)]TJ /F5 11.955 Tf 11.95 0 Td[(rsin_ =(qsin+rcos)sec(2{49) 2.3.2.2Positionequations Anadditionalthreeequationsarederivedfromtheightvelocitycomponentsrelativetotheinertiallydenedreferenceframe.Inordertoderivetheseequations,theinertiallydenedvelocitycomponents,representedinthebody-xedcoordinatesystem,mustrstbedened,asseeninEquation 2{50 266664xyz377775EB=266664dx/dtdy/dtdz/dt377775EB(2{50) 44

PAGE 45

AnEulertransformationmaybeusedtotransformthebody-denedvelocities,(u;v;w),intothedesiredEarth-denedvelocities.Thistransformationiscompletedbyapplyingequation 2{5 ,inreverseorder,tothebody-denedvelocities,asseeninEquation 2{51 266664dx/dtdy/dtdz/dt377775EB=266664coscos sinsincos )]TJ /F1 11.955 Tf 11.95 0 Td[(cossin cossincos +sinsin cossin sinsinsin )]TJ /F1 11.955 Tf 11.95 0 Td[(coscos cossinsin +sincos )]TJ /F1 11.955 Tf 11.29 0 Td[(sinsincoscoscos377775266664uvw377775B(2{51) Afull-ordersetofnon-linearvelocityequationscanthusbefoundbyrstcompletingthethematrixmultiplicationontherighthandsideofEquation 2{51 andthenequatingbothsides,asseeninEquation 2{52 _xEB=uBcoscos +vB(sinsincos )]TJ /F1 11.955 Tf 11.95 0 Td[(cossin )+wB(cossincos +sinsin )_yEB=uBcossin +vB(sinsinsin )]TJ /F1 11.955 Tf 11.95 0 Td[(coscos )+wB(cossinsin +sincos )_zEB=)]TJ /F5 11.955 Tf 9.3 0 Td[(uBsin+vB(sincos)+wBcoscos(2{52) IntegratingEquation 2{52 yieldstheairplane'spositionrelativetotheinertially-xedreferenceframe. 2.3.3TheEquationsCollected Thenonlinearaircraftequationsofmotioncanbecollectedintoaformalset,asshowninEquation 2{53 45

PAGE 46

m(_u+qw)]TJ /F5 11.955 Tf 11.95 0 Td[(rv)=)]TJ /F5 11.955 Tf 9.3 0 Td[(mgsin+()]TJ /F5 11.955 Tf 9.29 0 Td[(DcosA+LsinA)+TsinTm(_v+ru)]TJ /F5 11.955 Tf 11.95 0 Td[(pw)=mgsincos+FAy+FTym(_w+pv)]TJ /F5 11.955 Tf 11.96 0 Td[(qu)=FGz+FAz+FTzL=_pIx)]TJ /F5 11.955 Tf 11.96 0 Td[(qrIy+qrIz+(pr)]TJ /F1 11.955 Tf 14.11 0 Td[(_q)Ixy)]TJ /F1 11.955 Tf 11.95 0 Td[((pq+_r)Ixz+(r2)]TJ /F5 11.955 Tf 11.95 0 Td[(q2)Iyz+p_Ix)]TJ /F5 11.955 Tf 11.96 0 Td[(q_Ixy)]TJ /F5 11.955 Tf 11.96 0 Td[(r_IxzM=prIx+_qIy)]TJ /F5 11.955 Tf 11.96 0 Td[(prIz)]TJ /F1 11.955 Tf 11.95 0 Td[((qr)]TJ /F1 11.955 Tf 14.24 0 Td[(_p)Ixy+(p2)]TJ /F5 11.955 Tf 11.95 0 Td[(r2)Ixz+(pq)]TJ /F1 11.955 Tf 13.78 0 Td[(_r)Iyz+q_Iy)]TJ /F5 11.955 Tf 11.96 0 Td[(p_Ixy)]TJ /F5 11.955 Tf 11.96 0 Td[(r_IyzN=)]TJ /F5 11.955 Tf 9.3 0 Td[(pqIx+pqIy+_rIz+(q2)]TJ /F5 11.955 Tf 11.95 0 Td[(p2)Ixy+(qr)]TJ /F1 11.955 Tf 14.24 0 Td[(_p)Ixz)]TJ /F1 11.955 Tf 11.96 0 Td[((pr+_q)Iyz+r_Iz)]TJ /F5 11.955 Tf 11.95 0 Td[(p_Ixz)]TJ /F5 11.955 Tf 11.95 0 Td[(q_Iyz_=p+q(sin+rcos)tan_=qcos)]TJ /F5 11.955 Tf 11.96 0 Td[(rsin_ =(qsin+rcos)sec_xEB=uBcoscos +vB(sinsincos )]TJ /F1 11.955 Tf 11.95 0 Td[(cossin )+wB(cossincos +sinsin )_yEB=uBcossin +vB(sinsinsin )]TJ /F1 11.955 Tf 11.95 0 Td[(coscos )+wB(cossinsin +sincos )_zEB=)]TJ /F5 11.955 Tf 9.3 0 Td[(uBsin+vB(sincos)+wBcoscos(2{53) 2.4LinearizedEquationsofMotion Oftentimes,thenonlinearsetofmotionequationsislinearizedforuseinstabilityandcontrolanalysis.Thelinearizationiscarriedoutbymeansofthesmall-disturbancetheory.Whenusingthesmall-disturbancetheory,itisassumedthatthemotionoftheaircraftconsistsofsmalldeviationsfromareferenceconditionofsteadyight.Limitationsdoapplytothesmall-disturbancetheory,inthatproblemscontaininglargedisturbanceangles(i.e.:==2)cannotbelinearizedusingthismethod. Whenusingthesmall-disturbancetheory,allthevariablesintheequationsofmotionarereplacedbyareferencevalueplussomeperturbationasshowninEquation 2{54 46

PAGE 47

u=uo+up=p0+px=x0+xM=M0+Mv=v0+vq=q0+qy=y0+yN=N0+Nw=w0+wr=r0+rz=z0+zL=L0+L(2{54) Forconvenience,thereferenceightconditionisassumedtobesteadytrimmedightwithasymmetriccongurationandnoangularvelocity.TheseassumptionscanbephysicallyillustratedasshowninEquation 2{55 v0=p0=q0=r0=0=0=0(2{55) Furthermore,thex-axisisassumedtobeinitiallyalignedalongthedirectionoftheaircraft'svelocityvector,thus,w0=0.Asaresult,u0isequaltothereferenceightspeedand0tothereferenceangleofclimb.Forreasonsofsimplication,itisnotedthattheatrigonometricidentitymaybeapplied,asdenedinEquation 2{56 sin(0+)=sin0cos+cos0sin:=sin0+cos0cos(0+)=cos0cos)]TJ /F1 11.955 Tf 11.95 0 Td[(sin0sin:=cos0)]TJ /F1 11.955 Tf 11.96 0 Td[(sin0(2{56) Ageneralsetoflinearizedmotionequationsmaybeobtained,asshowninEquation 2{57 ,byapplyingthesmall-disturbancetheory,combinedwiththepreviouslymadeassumptions,tothenonlinearsetofmotionequations,givenbyequation 2{53 ,andretainingonlytherstorderterms. 47

PAGE 48

x0+x)]TJ /F5 11.955 Tf 11.95 0 Td[(mg(sin0+cos0)=m_uy0+y+mgcos0=m(_v+u0r)z0+z+mg(cos0)]TJ /F1 11.955 Tf 11.96 0 Td[(sin0)=m(_w)]TJ /F5 11.955 Tf 11.95 0 Td[(u0q)L0+L=Ix_p)]TJ /F5 11.955 Tf 11.95 0 Td[(Izx_rM0+M=Iy_qN0+N=)]TJ /F5 11.955 Tf 9.3 0 Td[(Izx_p+Iz_r_0+_=q_0_=p+rtan0_ 0_ =rsec0_xE0+_xE=(u0+u)cos0)]TJ /F5 11.955 Tf 11.95 0 Td[(u0sin0+wsin0_yE0+_yE=u0cos0+v_zE0+_zE=)]TJ /F1 11.955 Tf 9.3 0 Td[((u0+u)sin0)]TJ /F5 11.955 Tf 11.95 0 Td[(u0cos0+wcos0(2{57) IfallofthedisturbancesinEquation 2{57 aresetequaltozero,thentheresultingsetoflinearizedmotionequationsarerepresentativeofthosedenedforreferenceight. Iftheassumptionismadethattheaircraftisatitsreferenceightcondition,thedisturbancequantitiesareconsiderednegligibleandthereforesetequaltozero.Applyingthisassumptiontoequation 2{57 ,itisseenthatasetofequationsisdeveloped,asseeninEquation 2{58 ,whichcanbeusedtoeliminateallofthereferenceforcesandmomentsfoundinEquation 2{57 X0)]TJ /F5 11.955 Tf 11.95 0 Td[(mgsin0=0Y0=0Z0+mgcos0=0L0=M0+N0=0_xE0=u0cos0_yE0=0_zE0=)]TJ /F5 11.955 Tf 9.3 0 Td[(u0sin0(2{58) 48

PAGE 49

Equation 2{58 canbesustitutedbackintoEquation 2{57 ,suchthattheresultinglinearizedmotionequationscanberewrittenanddened,asseeninEquation 2{59 _u=x m)]TJ /F5 11.955 Tf 11.96 0 Td[(gcos0_v=y m+gcos0)]TJ /F5 11.955 Tf 11.95 0 Td[(u0r_w=z m)]TJ /F5 11.955 Tf 11.95 0 Td[(gsin0+u0qL=Ix_p)]TJ /F5 11.955 Tf 11.95 0 Td[(Izx_rM=Iy_qN=)]TJ /F5 11.955 Tf 9.3 0 Td[(Izx_q_=q_=p+rtan0_=rsec0_xE=ucos0)]TJ /F5 11.955 Tf 11.96 0 Td[(u0sin0+wsin0_yE=u0cos0+v_zE=)]TJ /F1 11.955 Tf 9.3 0 Td[(usin0)]TJ /F5 11.955 Tf 11.96 0 Td[(u0cos0+wcos0(2{59) TheperturbationtermsrepresentaerodynamicforcesandmomentsthatcanbeexpressedbymeansofaTaylorseriesexpansion.TheTaylorseriesexpansionmaycontainallofthemotionvariables,butisnormallyreducedtoonlythesignicanttermsrelevanttothatpaticularforceormoment.Forexample,theTaylorseriesexpansionforthechangeinrollmoment,L,maybeexpressedasafunctionofthemoments,forcesandcontrolsurfacedeections,asseeninEquation 2{60 L=@L @uu+@L @vv+@L @ww+@L @qq+@L @pp+@L @rr+@L @aa+@L @rr+@L @ee(2{60) 2.5Examples Toillustratethederivationandlinearizationprocessfurther,anexamplewillbegiven.Theexamplewillexamineanaircraftthatiscapableofmorphingboth 49

PAGE 50

symmetricallyandasymmetrically.Itisnoticedthattheonlyequationsthatvarywithsymmetryarethemomentequationsgivenbyequation 2{46 .Thenonlinearmomentequationswillrstbelinearizedandthenreducedaccordingtocongurationandaerodynamicassumptions. 2.5.1Linearization Startingwiththenonlinearmomentequations,asdenedinequation 2{46 ,thesmall-disturbancetheoryisapplied,thusresultingintheperturbationequationsshowninEquation 2{61 L0+L=_pIx+(r0q+q0r)(Iz)]TJ /F5 11.955 Tf 11.95 0 Td[(Iy)+(p0r+r0p)]TJ /F1 11.955 Tf 11.96 0 Td[(_q)Ixy)]TJ /F1 11.955 Tf 11.96 0 Td[((p0q+q0p+_r)Ixz+(2r0)]TJ /F1 11.955 Tf 11.96 0 Td[(2q0q)Iyz+p_Ix)]TJ /F1 11.955 Tf 11.96 0 Td[(q_Ixy)]TJ /F1 11.955 Tf 11.95 0 Td[(r_IxzM0+M=(r0p+p0r)(Ix)]TJ /F5 11.955 Tf 11.96 0 Td[(Iz)+_qIy)]TJ /F1 11.955 Tf 11.95 0 Td[((q0r+r0q+_p)Ixy+(2p0p)]TJ /F1 11.955 Tf 11.96 0 Td[(2r0r)Ixz+(q0p+p0q)]TJ /F1 11.955 Tf 11.95 0 Td[(_r)Iyz+q_Iy)]TJ /F1 11.955 Tf 11.95 0 Td[(p_Ixy)]TJ /F1 11.955 Tf 11.96 0 Td[(r_IyzN0+N=(p0q+q0p)(Iy)]TJ /F5 11.955 Tf 11.95 0 Td[(Ix)+_rIz)]TJ /F1 11.955 Tf 11.96 0 Td[((2q0q)]TJ /F1 11.955 Tf 11.96 0 Td[(2p0p)Ixy+(r0q)]TJ /F5 11.955 Tf 11.96 0 Td[(q0r)]TJ /F1 11.955 Tf 11.96 0 Td[(_p)Ixz)]TJ /F1 11.955 Tf 11.96 0 Td[((r0p+p0r)]TJ /F1 11.955 Tf 11.95 0 Td[(_q)Iyz+r_Iz)]TJ /F1 11.955 Tf 11.96 0 Td[(p_Ixz)]TJ /F1 11.955 Tf 11.95 0 Td[(q_Iyz(2{61) Equation 2{61 canberearrangedinsuchamannerthatitisexpressedasadierentialequation,asseeninEquation 2{62 Ix_p)]TJ /F5 11.955 Tf 11.96 0 Td[(Ixy_q)]TJ /F5 11.955 Tf 11.95 0 Td[(Ixz_r=L0+L+()]TJ /F5 11.955 Tf 9.3 0 Td[(r0Ixy+q0Ixz)]TJ /F1 11.955 Tf 14.68 3.02 Td[(_Ix)p+()]TJ /F5 11.955 Tf 9.3 0 Td[(r0(Iz)]TJ /F5 11.955 Tf 11.95 0 Td[(Iy)+p0Ixz+2q0Iyz+_Ixy)q+()]TJ /F5 11.955 Tf 9.3 0 Td[(q0(Iz)]TJ /F5 11.955 Tf 11.96 0 Td[(Iy))]TJ /F5 11.955 Tf 11.96 0 Td[(p0Ixy)]TJ /F1 11.955 Tf 11.96 0 Td[(2r0Iyz+_Ixz)r)]TJ /F5 11.955 Tf 9.29 0 Td[(Ixy_p)]TJ /F5 11.955 Tf 11.96 0 Td[(Iy_q)]TJ /F5 11.955 Tf 11.95 0 Td[(Iyz_r=M0+M+()]TJ /F5 11.955 Tf 9.3 0 Td[(r0(Ix)]TJ /F5 11.955 Tf 11.96 0 Td[(Iz))]TJ /F1 11.955 Tf 11.96 0 Td[(2p0Ixz)]TJ /F5 11.955 Tf 11.95 0 Td[(q0Iyz+_Ixy)p+(r0Ixy)]TJ /F5 11.955 Tf 11.95 0 Td[(p0Iyz)]TJ /F1 11.955 Tf 14.68 3.02 Td[(_Iy)q+()]TJ /F5 11.955 Tf 9.3 0 Td[(p0(Ix)]TJ /F5 11.955 Tf 11.96 0 Td[(Iz)+q0Ixy+2r0Ixz+_Iyz)r)]TJ /F5 11.955 Tf 9.29 0 Td[(Ixz_p)]TJ /F5 11.955 Tf 11.96 0 Td[(Iyz_q+Iz_r=N0+N+()]TJ /F5 11.955 Tf 9.3 0 Td[(q0(Iy)]TJ /F5 11.955 Tf 11.96 0 Td[(Ix)+2p0Ixy+r0Iyz+_Ixz)p+()]TJ /F5 11.955 Tf 9.3 0 Td[(p0(Iy)]TJ /F5 11.955 Tf 11.95 0 Td[(Ix))]TJ /F5 11.955 Tf 11.96 0 Td[(r0Ixz)]TJ /F1 11.955 Tf 11.96 0 Td[(2q0Ixy+_Iyz)q+()]TJ /F5 11.955 Tf 9.3 0 Td[(q0Ixz+p0Iyz)]TJ /F1 11.955 Tf 14.68 3.02 Td[(_Iz)r(2{62) 50

PAGE 51

Theaircraftisassumedtobeatstraightandleveltrimmed(reference)ight,therefore,thedisturbancevaluescanbesetequaltozeroandEquation 2{62 canbefurtherreduced,asshownbyEquation 2{63 Ix_p)]TJ /F5 11.955 Tf 11.95 0 Td[(Ixy_q)]TJ /F5 11.955 Tf 11.96 0 Td[(Ixz_r=L)]TJ /F1 11.955 Tf 14.68 3.02 Td[(_Ixp+_Ixyq+_Ixzr)]TJ /F5 11.955 Tf 9.3 0 Td[(Ixy_p+Iy_q)]TJ /F5 11.955 Tf 11.96 0 Td[(Iyz_r=M+_Ixyp)]TJ /F1 11.955 Tf 14.68 3.02 Td[(_Iyq+_Iyzr)]TJ /F5 11.955 Tf 9.3 0 Td[(Ixz_p)]TJ /F5 11.955 Tf 11.96 0 Td[(Iyz_q+Iz_r=N+_Ixzp+_Iyzq)]TJ /F1 11.955 Tf 14.69 3.03 Td[(_Izr(2{63) Notethattheinertialrates(_Iterms)areretainedinthelinearizedmomentequations.Theretentionofthesetermsisdoneinordertoaccountforthefactthattheaircraftiscapableofmorphing.Solvingequation 2{63 intermsof_p;_qand_rresultsinthethreeequationsshowninEquation 2{64 _p=Ppp+Pqq+Prr+PLL+PMM+PNN D_q=Qpp+Qqq+Qrr+QLL+QMM+QNN D_r=Rpp+Rqq+Rrr+RLL+RMM+RNN D(2{64) ThecoecientsoftheperturbationtermsinEquation 2{63 areexpressedasfunctionsoftheinertialmoments,productsandrates,asseeninEquation 2{65 51

PAGE 52

Pp=)]TJ /F5 11.955 Tf 9.3 0 Td[(I2yz_Ix+IzIy_Ix)]TJ /F5 11.955 Tf 11.96 0 Td[(IxyIz_Ixy)]TJ /F5 11.955 Tf 11.96 0 Td[(IxyIyz_Ixz)]TJ /F5 11.955 Tf 11.95 0 Td[(IxzIyz_Ixy)]TJ /F5 11.955 Tf 11.95 0 Td[(IxzIy_IxzPq=IxyIz_Iy)]TJ /F5 11.955 Tf 11.95 0 Td[(IxyIyz_Iyz+IxzIyz_Iy)]TJ /F5 11.955 Tf 11.95 0 Td[(IxzIy_Iyz)]TJ /F5 11.955 Tf 11.95 0 Td[(IzIy_Ixy+Iyz_IxyPr=)]TJ /F5 11.955 Tf 9.3 0 Td[(IxyIz_Iyz+IxyIyz_Iz+I2yz_Ixz+IxzIy_Iz)]TJ /F5 11.955 Tf 11.95 0 Td[(IxzIyz_Iyz)]TJ /F5 11.955 Tf 11.95 0 Td[(IyIz_IxzPL=I2yz)]TJ /F5 11.955 Tf 11.95 0 Td[(IzIyPM=)]TJ /F5 11.955 Tf 9.29 0 Td[(IxyIz)]TJ /F5 11.955 Tf 11.95 0 Td[(IxzIyzPN=)]TJ /F5 11.955 Tf 9.29 0 Td[(IxyIyz)]TJ /F5 11.955 Tf 11.95 0 Td[(IxzIyQp=)]TJ /F5 11.955 Tf 9.3 0 Td[(IxIz_Ixy)]TJ /F5 11.955 Tf 11.96 0 Td[(IxIyz_Ixz)]TJ /F5 11.955 Tf 11.96 0 Td[(IxzIxy_Ixz+IyzIxz_Ix+I2xz_Ixy+IxyIz_IxQq=IxIz_Iy)]TJ /F5 11.955 Tf 11.96 0 Td[(IxIyz_Iyz)]TJ /F5 11.955 Tf 11.95 0 Td[(IxzIxy_Iyz)]TJ /F5 11.955 Tf 11.96 0 Td[(IyzIxz_Ixy)]TJ /F5 11.955 Tf 11.95 0 Td[(I2xz_Iy)]TJ /F5 11.955 Tf 11.96 0 Td[(IxyIz_IxyQr=)]TJ /F5 11.955 Tf 9.3 0 Td[(IxIz_Iyz+IxIyz_Iz+IxzIxy_Iz)]TJ /F5 11.955 Tf 11.96 0 Td[(IyzIxz_Ixz+I2xz_Iyz)]TJ /F5 11.955 Tf 11.96 0 Td[(IxyIz_IxzQL=)]TJ /F5 11.955 Tf 9.3 0 Td[(IyzIxz)]TJ /F5 11.955 Tf 11.95 0 Td[(IxyIzQM=)]TJ /F5 11.955 Tf 9.3 0 Td[(IxIz+I2xzQN=)]TJ /F5 11.955 Tf 9.3 0 Td[(IxIyz)]TJ /F5 11.955 Tf 11.96 0 Td[(IxzIxyRp=I2xy_Ixz+IxzIy_Ix)]TJ /F5 11.955 Tf 11.96 0 Td[(IxIyz_Ixy+IyzIxy_Ix)]TJ /F5 11.955 Tf 11.95 0 Td[(IxzIxy_Ixy)]TJ /F5 11.955 Tf 11.96 0 Td[(IxIy_IxzRq=)]TJ /F5 11.955 Tf 9.29 0 Td[(IxzIy_Ixy+I2xy_Iyz+IxIyz_Iy)]TJ /F5 11.955 Tf 11.96 0 Td[(IyzIxy_Ixy+IxzIxy_Iy)]TJ /F5 11.955 Tf 11.96 0 Td[(IxIy_IyzRr=)]TJ /F5 11.955 Tf 9.29 0 Td[(IxzIy_Ixz)]TJ /F5 11.955 Tf 11.96 0 Td[(I2xy_Iz)]TJ /F5 11.955 Tf 11.95 0 Td[(IyzIxy_Ixz+IxIy_Iz)]TJ /F5 11.955 Tf 11.95 0 Td[(IxzIxy_Iyz)]TJ /F5 11.955 Tf 11.96 0 Td[(IxIyz_IyzRL=)]TJ /F5 11.955 Tf 9.3 0 Td[(IxzIy)]TJ /F5 11.955 Tf 11.95 0 Td[(IyzIxyRM=)]TJ /F5 11.955 Tf 9.3 0 Td[(IxzIxy)]TJ /F5 11.955 Tf 11.95 0 Td[(IxIyzRN=)]TJ /F5 11.955 Tf 9.3 0 Td[(IxIy+I2xy(2{65) Thecommondenominator,D,foundinEquation 2{64 isalsoexpressedasafunctionoftheinertialmoments,products,andrates,asseeninEquation 2{66 D=)]TJ /F5 11.955 Tf 9.29 0 Td[(IxIyIz+I2xzIy+IzI2xy+IxI2yz+2IyzIxyIxz(2{66) MotionvariablescanbeaccountedforinthemomentequationsbyexpressingthemasatermintheTaylorseriesexpansion,asseeninEquation 2{67 52

PAGE 53

L=@L @uu+@L @vv+@L @ww+@L @qq+@L @pp+@L @rr+@L @aa+@L @rr+@L @eeM=@M @uu+@M @vv+@M @ww+@M @qq+@M @pp+@M @rr+@M @aa+@M @rr+@M @eeN=@N @uu+@N @vv+@N @ww+@N @qq+@N @pp+@N @rr+@N @aa+@N @rr+@N @ee(2{67) ThefullyexpandedsetoflinearizedmomentequationscanbeobtainedbyinsertingEquations 2{63 and 2{67 intoequation 2{63 andmultiplyingouttheterms. 2.5.2AsymmetricMorphing Figure2-7. AsymmetricCongurations Theasymmetriccaseassumesthatthereisnosymmetrytakenwithrespecttotheaircraft'scenterofgravity.Itisalsoassumedthattheaircraftisactivelymorphing,andtherefore,theinertialratesareretained.Themomentequationsspecictotheasymmetricmorphingcase,havepreviouslybeendenedandareshowninEquations 2{63 2{67 .Ifitisdeterminedthattheaircraftnolongermorphs,theinertialratesgotozeroandequation 2{63 canbefurtherreduced,asseeninEquation 2{68 Ix_p)]TJ /F5 11.955 Tf 11.96 0 Td[(Ixy_q)]TJ /F5 11.955 Tf 11.95 0 Td[(Ixz_r=L)]TJ /F5 11.955 Tf 9.3 0 Td[(Ixy_p+Iy_q)]TJ /F5 11.955 Tf 11.95 0 Td[(Iyz_r=M)]TJ /F5 11.955 Tf 9.3 0 Td[(Ixz_p)]TJ /F5 11.955 Tf 11.95 0 Td[(Iyz_q+Iz_r=N(2{68) 53

PAGE 54

Figure2-8. SymmetricCongurations 2.5.3SymmetricConguration Thesymmetriccaseassumesthatthereissymmetryinthexy-andyz-planes.Asadirectresult,allofthetermsrelateddescribedbyIxyandIyzgotozero.Thesymmetricexampleissimilartoasymmetriccase,inthatitisalsoassumedtobeactivelymorphing.Therefore,theinertialratesareagainretainedandtheresultingmomentequationsforsymmetricmorphingcanbeshownbyEquation 2{69 Ix_p)]TJ /F5 11.955 Tf 11.96 0 Td[(Ixz_r=L)]TJ /F1 11.955 Tf 14.68 3.02 Td[(_Ixp+_Ixzr)]TJ /F5 11.955 Tf 9.3 0 Td[(Iy_q=M)]TJ /F1 11.955 Tf 14.68 3.03 Td[(_Iyq)]TJ /F5 11.955 Tf 9.3 0 Td[(Ixz_p+Iz_r=N+_Ixzp)]TJ /F1 11.955 Tf 14.69 3.02 Td[(_Izr(2{69) Ifitisdeterminedthattheaircraftnolongermorphs,theinertialratesagaingotozeroandequation 2{69 canbereducedtothemomentequations,asseeninEquations 2{59 and 2{70 Ix_p)]TJ /F5 11.955 Tf 11.96 0 Td[(Ixz_r=LIy_q=M)]TJ /F5 11.955 Tf 9.3 0 Td[(Ixz_p+Iz_r=N(2{70) 54

PAGE 55

2.6ATechnicalApproachtotheEquationsofMotion Theequationsofmotion,includingasymmetricandtime-varyingshapesofassociatedmorphingactuation,canbesimpliedintotheformgiveninEquation 2{71 .Thisformdescribesasystemwithnxstatesalongwithnmorphingactuatorsandnutraditionalactuatorssuchthatx2Rnxisthestatevector,2Rnisthecommandtomorphing,andu2Rnuisthecommandtotraditionalcontrolsurfaces.ThecoecientsintheequationsofmotionarecombinedintoA2RnxnxandB2Rnxnuwhicharefunctionsofboththemorphingconguration,,andtheightcondition,. _x=A(;)x+B(;)u(2{71) ThemodelinEquation 2{72a representstheightdynamicsforanaircraftwithaxedconguration.Inotherwords,thismodeldescribesanaircraftwithoutmorphing.Thismodelutilizesmatricesthatdependonanexogenous,butmeasurable,variablesuchasMachoraltitude.Thisformisactuallythelinearparameter-varying(LPV)dynamicswhichhavebeenextensivelystudied[ 42 ]. _x=A()x+B()uu=K()x(2{72a) ThemodelinEquation 2{72b representstheightdynamicsforanaircraftataxedightcondition.Theaircraftisallowedtomorph;however,theaerodynamicsdonotvarybecauseofMachoraltitudechanges.Theresearcherproposestodenotethisformaslinearinput-varyingdynamics(LIV)becauseofthedependencyonthecommandinputfordynamicswhicharelinearinthestates. _x=A()x+B()uu=K()x(2{72b) 55

PAGE 56

Clearlyamorphingaircrafthashighlystructureddynamics.Inparticular,notethattheightdynamicsreverttoalinearstate-spaceforminEquation 2{72c whenbothmorphingandightconditionarexed.Themodelthusrepresentsanimportantphysicalaspectofmorphing;specically,theaircraftwillhavetraditionaldynamicsformaneuveringaroundtrimwhenmorphedintoaxedconguration. _x=Ax+Buu=Kx(2{72c) 56

PAGE 57

CHAPTER3LINEARTIME-VARYINGEIGENSTRUCTURESANDTHEIRSTABILITY:ASURVEY 3.1DenitionofanLTVSystem Alinear-time-varying(LTV)systemcanbedenedbythecoupledlinearhomogeneousdierentialequationsshowninEquation 3{1 _x=A(t)x(t)+B(t)u(t)y(t)=C(t)x(t)+D(t)u(t)(3{1) Forthepurposesofstudyinthispaper,theLTVstateequationwillberestrictedtoformshowninEquation 3{2 _x=A(t)x(t)(3{2) FromEquation 3{2 ,itisnotedthatcoecientmatrix,A(t),iscomposedsuchthatA2R+!Rnxn,whilethestatevector,x(t),iscomposedsuchthatx2R+!Rn,andnisthenumberofstatesinthesystem.Usingthisdenitionofalineartime-varyingsystem,multipleconceptsforLTVeigenpairsandtheirstabilityhavebeendeveloped. 3.2Kamen'sConceptofPolesofanLTVSystem 3.2.1TwoStateSystem ConsiderasecondorderLTVsystemoftheform: x+a1(t)_x+a0(t)x(t)=0(3{3) whichcanbewrittenusingoperatornotationD=d dt,as (D2+a1(t)D+a0(t))x(t)=0(3{4) Ifthereexistfunctionsp1(t)andp2(t)suchthatonecanwrite (D2+a1(t)D+a0(t))x(t)=(D)]TJ /F5 11.955 Tf 11.95 0 Td[(p1(t))f(D)]TJ /F5 11.955 Tf 11.95 0 Td[(p2(t))x(t)g(3{5) 57

PAGE 58

andwedenea(noncommutative)polynomialmultiplicationosuchthat f(D)]TJ /F5 11.955 Tf 11.96 0 Td[(p1(t))o(D)]TJ /F5 11.955 Tf 11.95 0 Td[(p2(t))gx(t)=(D)]TJ /F5 11.955 Tf 11.96 0 Td[(p1(t))f(D)]TJ /F5 11.955 Tf 11.96 0 Td[(p2(t))x(t)g(3{6) thencomparing 3{5 and 3{6 ,onecandeneDop2(t)=p2(t)D+_p2(t),andnallyarriveatanequationforp2as p22(t)+_p2(t)+a1(t)p2(t)+a0(t)=0(3{7) fromwhichonecanthendeterminep1using p1(t)+p2(t)=)]TJ /F5 11.955 Tf 9.3 0 Td[(a1(t)(3{8)(p1(t);p2(t))thenformapoleset,andp2(t)iscalledarightpole.Notethatthisisanorderedpoleset,andevenwhenp1(t)andp2(t)arecomplex,theyneednot,ingeneral,becomplexconjugate[ 59 ]. Themodeassociatedwitharightpolep2(t)isdenedas p2(t;0)=eRt0p2()d(3{9) andonecanwrite x(t)=C121(t;0)+C222(t;0)(3{10) wherep21andp22representtworightpolesdeterminedbysolvingequation 3{7 fromtwodierentinitialconditions(whicharetypicallythetwotimeinvariantpolesatt=0,alsoreferredtoasthe"frozen-time"rootsof 3{3 att=0);andC1andC2areconstants.21(t;0)and22(t;0)giveinformationaboutthestabilityoftheLTVsystem[ 59 ]. 3.2.2FourStateSystem Thegeneralizedformofa4-statesystemisexpressedinEquation 3{11 .Inthiscase,thederivativesofthestate,w(t),aremultipliedbyrealcoecientsofA0(t);A1(t);A2(t);A3(t).Theexpressionisalteredusingoperatornotation,givenasD=d dtasinEquation 3{4 ,togenerateEquation 3{12 58

PAGE 59

0=d4w dt4+A3(t)d3w dt3+A2(t)d2w dt2+A1(t)dw dt+A0(t)w (3{11) =)]TJ /F5 11.955 Tf 5.48 -9.68 Td[(D4+A3(t)D3+A2(t)D2+A1(t)D+A0(t)w(t) (3{12) Theconceptofanordersetofpoles,(p1(t);p2(t);p3(t)p4(t)),isintroducedandrelatetothedynamicsasinEquation 3{13 )]TJ /F5 11.955 Tf 5.48 -9.69 Td[(D4+A3(t)D3+A2(t)D2+A1(t)D+A0(t)w(t)=(D)]TJ /F5 11.955 Tf 9.3 0 Td[(p1(t))[(D)]TJ /F5 11.955 Tf 9.3 0 Td[(p2(t)f(D)]TJ /F5 11.955 Tf 9.3 0 Td[(p3(t))[D)]TJ /F5 11.955 Tf 9.3 0 Td[(p4(t)]g]w(3{13) Therightpole,whichistheonlypoleneededtofullycharacterizethesystemisgeneratedasasolutiontoEquation 3{14 .Notethatagaintherightpole,p4,actuallyhas4valuesofp4iresultingfromchoiceofinitialconditionsforthepoles. 0=d3p4i dt3+(4p4i(t)+A3(t))d2p4i dt2+(6p24i(t)+A2(t)+3A3(t)p4i(t))dp4i dt+3(dp4i dt)2+p44i(t)+A3(t)p34i(t)+A2(t)p24i(t)+A1(t)p4i(t)+A0(t) (3{14) Asetofeigenvectorsareagainassociatedwitheachpole.Eacheigenvector,vi,anditassociatedpole,p4i,mustsatisfyEquation 3{15 (A(t))]TJ /F5 11.955 Tf 11.95 0 Td[(p4i(t))vi(t)=_vi(t)(3{15) Thestatesofthesystemarecomputedasalinearcombinationoftheseeigenvectorsandthemodes,givenasi=exp(Rt0p4i(t)),associatedwitheachpole.Theresultingexpressionisgivenalongwiththescalarconstants,Ci,inEquation 3{16 x(t)=C1v1(t)41(t)+C2v2(t)42(t)+C3v3(t)43(t)+C4v4(t)44(t)(3{16) 59

PAGE 60

ThedecompositionofthestatesintotheformofEquation 3{16 indicatesthetime-varyingparametersessentiallydiagonalizethesystem.ConsiderthatamatrixdenedasV(t)=[v1(t)jv2(t)jv3(t)jv4(t)]willdiagonalizethesystemmatrixaslongasV(t)isinvertibleandbounded. ThestabilityofthesystemisdeterminedbytherelationshipinEquation 3{16 .Essentially,thesystemhasasymptoticstabilityforwhichstateswilltendtoequilibriumifandonlyifthemagnitudeofthemodegoestozeroastimegoesincreases.Thiscondition,whichisexpressedasj4ij!0ast!1foreachi=1;2;3;4,isequivalenttoaconditionontherealpartofthepolebeingR10pR()d<0. 3.3ZhuandJohnson Annth-order,scalar,lineartime-varying(LTV)system y(n)=Xnk=1k(t)y(k)]TJ /F7 7.97 Tf 6.59 0 Td[(1)(3{17) canbeconvenientlyrepresentedasDfyg=0usingthescalarpolynomialdierentialoperator(SPDO) D=n+Xnk=1k(t)k)]TJ /F7 7.97 Tf 6.59 0 Td[(1(3{18) where=d=dtisthederivativeoperatordenedonthedierentialring(D-ring),K. UsingatechniquedevelopedbyFloquet[ 39 ],theSPDOcanbefactoredinto D=()]TJ /F5 11.955 Tf 11.96 0 Td[(n(t))()]TJ /F5 11.955 Tf 11.96 0 Td[(2(t))()]TJ /F5 11.955 Tf 11.96 0 Td[(1(t))(3{19) IfDisdenedasanSPDOoperatorwithtime-varyingcoecients,k2K,k=1;2;:::;n,thenthescalarfunctionsk2K,k=1;2;:::;ngivenbythefactorizationofequation 3{19 arecalledSeriesD-eigenvalues(SD-eigenvalues)ofD.Moreover,ifthereexistssome(t)suchthat(t)=1(t),then(t)iscalledaParallelD-eigenvalue(PD-eigenvalues)ofD. 60

PAGE 61

Amulti-setofSD-eigenvalues,)]TJ /F11 7.97 Tf 165.63 -1.79 Td[(=fk(t)gnk=1,canbedenedasaSeriesD-spectrum(SD-spectrum)forDifk(t)satisesequation 3{19 ;whereasamulti-setofPD-eigenvalues=fk(t)gnk=1canbedenedasaParallelD-spectrum(PD-spectrum)forDifk(t)arePD-eigenvaluesforDandfyk=exp(Rk(t)dt)gnk=1constitutesafundamentalsetofsolutionstoDfyg=0. Assumingthatfk(t)gnk=1isaSD-spectrumforannth-orderSPDOD,thenthePD-spectrumfk(t)gnk=1forDcanbedirectlyobtainedby k(t)=1(t)+_qk(t)q)]TJ /F7 7.97 Tf 6.58 0 Td[(1k(t);k=2;3;:::;n(3{20) where, qk(t)=Z21(t)Z32(t)ZZk;k)]TJ /F7 7.97 Tf 6.59 0 Td[(1(t)dk)]TJ /F7 7.97 Tf 6.59 0 Td[(1t(3{21) and ij(t)=eR(i(t))]TJ /F11 7.97 Tf 6.58 0 Td[(j(t))dt(3{22) Thefactthatascalarequationcanalwaysbetransformedintoanequivalentcompanioncanonicalvectorequation,_x=Ac(t)x,leadsonetodenethecompanionmatrixassociatedwithD,Ac(t)as Ac(t)=2666666666640100...........................0001)]TJ /F5 11.955 Tf 9.3 0 Td[(1)]TJ /F5 11.955 Tf 9.3 0 Td[(2)]TJ /F5 11.955 Tf 61.1 0 Td[(n377777777775(3{23) whichdirectlyresultsinthematrices 61

PAGE 62

\(t)=2666666666641(t)10002(t).....................0............100n(t)377777777775(3{24) and (t)=diag1(t)2(t)n(t)(3{25) denedasaSeriesSpectralcanonicalform(SScanonicalform)andaParallelSpectralcanonicalform(PS-canonicalform),repectively.ItisimportanttonotethatbothmatricesaredenedoverthebasisdescribedbyDandAc(t),andthatforanytime-invariantD,therealwaysexistsanSD-spectrumoftime-invariantisatisfyingequation 3{19 Welldened(freeofnite-timesingularities)SD-andPD-spectracanbeusedtoderiveanalyticalsolutionsandstabilitycriteriaforLTVsystemsinawaysimilartothoseforLTIsystems.Inparticular,iffk(t)gnk=1isawell-denedPD-spectrumforD,thenthegeneralsolutiony(t)toDfyg=0isgivenby y(t)=nXi=1CieRi(t)dt whereCiareconstantsofintegrationdeterminedbyinitialconditions. 3.3.1GeneralizedPD-Eigenvectors AssumingthatDisannth-orderSPDOwithaPD-spectrumfk(t)gnk=1andthatfyi(t)gnk=1isafundamentalsetofsolutionsforDfyg=0,suchthatyi(t)=eR(i(t)dt),thenthematrix,D,canbedenotedbythediagonalmatrix D=diag[y1y2:::yn](3{26) 62

PAGE 63

Then WD)]TJ /F7 7.97 Tf 6.58 0 Td[(1=V(12:::n)=266666666664111D1f1gD2f1gDnf1gD21f1gD22f1gD2nf1g............Dn)]TJ /F7 7.97 Tf 6.58 0 Td[(11f1gDn)]TJ /F7 7.97 Tf 6.59 0 Td[(1nf1g377777777775(3{27) and detV=detWnk=1y)]TJ /F7 7.97 Tf 6.59 0 Td[(1k(3{28) whereD1=(+i),Dki=DiDk)]TJ /F7 7.97 Tf 6.58 0 Td[(1i,andW=W(y1y2:::yn)istheWronskianmatrixassociatedwithfyigni=1. ThecanonicalcoordinatetransformationmatrixV(t)iscalledthemodalcanonicalmatrixforDassociatedwiththePD-spectrumfigni=1andthedeterminantinequation 3{28 iscalledtheassociatedmodaldeterminant.Itisnotedthatthecolumnvectorsvi(t)ofV(t)satisfy Ac(t)vi(t))]TJ /F5 11.955 Tf 11.96 0 Td[(i(t)vi(t)=_vi(t)(3{29) andtherowvectorsuTi(t)ofV(t)satisfy UTi(t)Ac(t))]TJ /F5 11.955 Tf 11.96 0 Td[(i(t)UTi(t)=_UTi(t)(3{30) Thus,vi(t)anduTi(t)havebeencalledcolumnPD-eigenvectorsandrowPD-eigenvectors,respectively,ofDassociatedwithit. 3.3.2StabilityCriteria AssumingthatDisawell-denednth-orderSPDOwithawell-denedPD-spectrumfk(t)gnk=1inI=[T0;1),suchthatvk(t)anduTi(t)arecolumnPD-eigenvectorsandrow 63

PAGE 64

PD-eigenvectorsassociatedwithk(t),respectively.ThenthenullsolutiontoDfyg=0isuniformlyasymptoticallystableforallt0T0ifandonlyif thereexistsa00and0
PAGE 65

issaidtobethemode-vectorofA(t)associatedwiththex-eigenpairfi(t);ui(t)gandisusedtodeterminethestabilityofthelineartime-varyingsystem. IfA(t)hasndistincteigenvalues,thenA(t)canalwaysbediagonalizedbyanon-singularmatrixformedbytheeigenvectorsofA(t).Thus,thex-eigenvectorsofA(t)arefoundbyusingtheeigenvectorsofA(t)andthederivedmatricesobtainedfromA(t). Toobtainthex-eigenpairsofA(t),itisrstassumedthatj=1andAj(t)=A(t).TheeigenpairsofA(t),fji(t);uji(t)gi=1;2;:::;narethencomputedtocheckfordistinctnessoftheeigenvalues,fji(t)gni. Iftheeigenvaluesaredistinctthen Sj(t)=[u1j(t)u2j(t):::unj(t)](3{34) where j(t)=diag[1j(t)2j(t):::nj(t)](3{35) butiftheeigenvalues,fji(t)gni,arenotdistinct,thenanon-singularmatrixSj(t)ischosen.OnceSj(t)andj(t)hasbeendetermined,thedierentialequation Ej(t)=_Sj(t)S)]TJ /F7 7.97 Tf 6.59 0 Td[(1j(t)+Aj(t))]TJ /F9 11.955 Tf 11.95 0 Td[(A(t)(3{36) issolved.ForcaseswhereEj(t)0,thenSj(t)=S(t)andj(t)=(t).Thecolumns,ui(t)ofS(t)givethex-eigenvectorsofA(t)andtheelementsof(t),fi(t);ui(t)g,givethex-eigenvaluesofA(t).ForcaseswhereEj(t)6=0,thenj=j+1andAj(t)=Aj)]TJ /F7 7.97 Tf 6.58 0 Td[(1(t))]TJ /F9 11.955 Tf 11.45 0 Td[(Ej)]TJ /F7 7.97 Tf 6.59 0 Td[(1(t).TheprocedureisthencontinuedbyrecalculatingtheeigenpairsofA(t),fji(t);uji(t)gi=1;2;:::;nandcheckingfortheirdistinctness.TheiterationprocessesendswhenEj(t)0. Thecalulatedx-eigenpaircanthenbeusedtoproduceasystemresponsesuchthat 65

PAGE 66

x(t)=C1eR1(t)dte1(t)+C2eR2(t)dte2(t) whereC1andC2arecontantsofintegrationdeterminedbyinitialconditions. 3.4.2StabilityCriteria Anecessaryconditionforasymptoticstabilityandthesucientconditionfortheinstabilityofthesystem,equation 3{31 ,canbeexplicitlyanddirectlycheckedformthesystemmatrixA(t). Thenecessaryconditionforthesystem,equation 3{31 ,tobeasymptoticallystable,isthatforanyt>t0,tRt0trA()d!t!1.WheretristhetraceofA(t)andisrepresentedasA(t)=nPi=1aii(t). Thesucientconditionforinstabilityofthesystem,equation 3{31 ,isthatforanyt>t0,tRt0trA()d!1t!1. Necessaryandsucientconditionsforasymptoticstabilityandinstability,respectively,canalsobedescribedforthelineartime-varyingsystem y(n)+a1(t)y(n)]TJ /F7 7.97 Tf 6.59 0 Td[(1)+:::+an(t)y=0(3{37) Asucientconditionforinstabilityofthesystem,equation 3{37 ,isdescribedby tZtoa1()d!t!1(3{38) whereanecessaryconditionforasymptoticstabilityisdescribedby tZtoa1()d!1t!1(3{39) Thenecessaryandsucientconditionspresentedthusfaronlyprovidepartialanswerstothestabilityoflineartime-varyingsystems.Therefore,necessaryandsucientconditionsforthestabilityoflineartime-varyingsystems,intermsofmode-vectors, 66

PAGE 67

aredeveloped.Recallthatthemode-vectorsarenon-zerodierentiablevectorsofA(t),associatedwiththex-eigenpairfi(t);ui(t)g. Thelineartime-varyingsystem, 3{31 ,isstableifandonlyifeverymode-vectormi(t)ofA(t)isboundedsuchthat kmi(t)k<1t>t0;i=1;2;:::;n(3{40) andasymptoticallystableifandonlyif,inadditiontoequation 3{39 kmi(t)k!0t!1;i=1;2;:::;n(3{41) 3.5O'BrienandIglesias 3.5.1Formulation Consideralineartime-varyingsystemasdescribedinEquation 3{42 forsomestatevector,x(t)2Rn,andassociatedmatrix,A(t)2Rnn,forallt2R. _x(t)=A(t)x(t)(3{42) Introduceanewvectorofstates,z(t)2Rn,whichrelatestox(t)throughatransformation,S(t)2Rnn,forallt2R.Therelationshipresultsasz(t)=S)]TJ /F7 7.97 Tf 6.59 0 Td[(1(t)x(t).TheexpressioninEquation 3{42 forx(t)isthuswrittenintermsofz(t)inEquation 3{43 _S(t)z(t)+S(t)_z(t)=A(t)S(t)z(t) (3{43) S(t)_z(t)=A(t)S(t)z(t))]TJ /F1 11.955 Tf 15.25 3.02 Td[(_S(t)z(t) (3{44) _z(t)=S)]TJ /F7 7.97 Tf 6.59 0 Td[(1(t)A(t)S(t))]TJ /F5 11.955 Tf 11.96 0 Td[(S)]TJ /F7 7.97 Tf 6.59 0 Td[(1(t)_S(t)z(t) (3{45) Denethematrix,P(t)=S)]TJ /F7 7.97 Tf 6.58 0 Td[(1(t)A(t)S(t))]TJ /F5 11.955 Tf 12.42 0 Td[(S)]TJ /F7 7.97 Tf 6.59 0 Td[(1(t)_S(t),suchthatEquation 3{45 isexpressedasEquation 3{46 67

PAGE 68

_z(t)=P(t)z(t)(3{46) ThestabilityofthesysteminEquation 3{42 isequivalenttothestabilityofthesysteminEquation 3{46 ifthematrix,S(t)isaLyapunovtransformation.Suchequivalenceisparticularlyadvantageousinthatcertainconditionscanbeimposedsuchthatthestatematrix,P(t),inEquation 3{46 isuppertriangularforallt2R.Assuch,thepolesandassociatedstabilityofP(t)arerelativelyeasytoextract. ApolesetofP(t)isdenedbasedonitsnatureasuppertriangular.Thisset,asgiveninDenition 3.5.1 ,utilizestransitionmatricesforbothP(t)andS(t). Denition3.5.1. ThesetoffunctionsP:=fp1;:::;pnginL1(C)isapolesetofAifthereexistfunctionskij2CL1,i=1;:::;n;j>iandaninvertiblenxnmatrixS0suchthat S(t)=A(t;0)S0)]TJ /F7 7.97 Tf 6.59 0 Td[(1P(t;0);t2R+(3{47) isaLyapunovtransformationwhereP=fpijgand pij=8>>>><>>>>:pi:i=jkij:ij(3{48) AsuitablechoiceofS(t)hasbeenshowntobetheuniquesolutionofthematrixdierentialequation,giveninEquation 3{49 ,whichresultsinaLyapunovtransformation[ 126 127 ].NotethisexpressionagreeswiththepreviousdenitionforP(t)fromEquation 3{45 _S(t)=A(t)S(t))]TJ /F9 11.955 Tf 11.96 0 Td[(S(t)P(t);S(0)=S0(3{49) ThepolesetasgiveninDenition 3.5.1 dependsonthestate-transitionmatrix,A(t;0),associatedwiththesysteminEquation 3{42 .Thismatrixcanbedirectly 68

PAGE 69

computedusingknowledgeofA(t)soitrepresentsaknownquantity.Furthermore,thismatrixcanbeseparatedintoelementsusingastandardQR-decompositionusinganorthogonalmatrixofQ2RnnwithQQ1=IandanuppertriangularmatrixofR2RnnasinEquation 3{50 A(t;0)=Q(t)R(t)(3{50) TheelementsinEquation 3{50 arecomparedtotherelationshipinEquation 3{47 whichcanbeexpressedasA(t;0)=S(t)P(t;0)S)]TJ /F7 7.97 Tf 6.59 0 Td[(10.Inthisway,thecomputationofS(t)isdirectlycomputedastheorthogonalmatrixoftheq-rdecompositionwhilethetransitionmatrixassociatedwiththestabilitymatrixofP(t)iscomputedasthetriangularmatrixusingtheequivalanceinEquation 3{51 A(t;0)=[Q(t)][R(t)]=[S(t)]P(t;0)S)]TJ /F7 7.97 Tf 6.59 0 Td[(10(3{51) Inthisway,astraightforwardq-rdecompositionisusedtodetermineboththepolesofP(t)andthemodeshapesofS(t).Suchanapproachishighlyadvantageouscomputationallysincetheelementsareeasilyfoundusingmaturealgorithms. Anissueofnoteisthenon-uniquenatureofthisdecomposition.Essentially,thematricesassociatedwithaq-rdecompositioncanbescaledbyanyunitarymatrix.Theinformationrelatingtostabilityisretained;however,theneedtointerpretthepolesissomewhathighlightedbythisresult.Considerthatthisnon-uniquenatureimpliesthatthesignofanyrealvaluealongthediagonalofR(t)bearbitrarilychangedsotheconceptofamodemustreecttheabilitytovarythesignofP(t;0)usingtherelationshipfromEquation 3{51 3.5.2StabilityCriteria Anotionofstabilitymustbedenedforthetime-varyingsystemgiveninEquation 3{42 thatrelatesusefulproperties.Inthiscase,stabilityreferstothestateremainingbounded 69

PAGE 70

byanexponentialdecay.ThisnotionisuniformexponentialstabilityandisdescribedinDenition 3.5.2 Denition3.5.2. Thestateequation,_x(t)=A(t)x(t)withx(0)=xo,isuniformlyexponentiallystableifthereexistnite,positiveconstantsof;2RsuchthatkA(t;)ke)]TJ /F11 7.97 Tf 6.59 0 Td[((t)]TJ /F11 7.97 Tf 6.59 0 Td[() Asimilarnotionofstabilityisassociatedwiththepolesandtheirstabilitymodes.ThisnotionalsorequiresthetransitionmatrixtoremainboundedbyanexponentialdecayasnotedinDenition 3.5.3 [ 86 ]. Denition3.5.3. Thestabilitymodesassociatedwithp2CL1(C)isuniformlyexponentiallystableifthereexistsnite,positiveconstantsof;2Rsuchthatjp(t;t0)je)]TJ /F11 7.97 Tf 6.59 0 Td[((t)]TJ /F11 7.97 Tf 6.59 0 Td[(t0);8(tt00) Arelaxednotionofstabilityisalsodenedinwhichthetransitionremainsboundedandconvergestotheorigin.ThisnotionofasymptoticalstabilityisdescribedinDenition 3.5.4 [ 86 ]. Denition3.5.4. Thestabilitymodeassociatedwithp2CL1(C)isasymptoticallystableif,foranyto2R+,thereexistsanite,positiveconstantsuchthatjp(t;t0)j6;tt0andjp(t;t0)j!0;t!1. AnotionofsimplyremainingboundedisalsousedtodescribestabilityasuniformlystableinDenition 3.5.5 [ 86 ]. Denition3.5.5. Thestabilitymodeassociatedwithp2CL1(C)isuniformlystableifthereexistsanite,positiveconstantsuchthatjp(t;t0)j6;8(tt00). Finally,ageneralizedconceptofboundednessisgivenasnonexponentialinDenition 3.5.6 Denition3.5.6. Thestabilitymodesassociatedwithp2CL1(C)isnon-exponentialifthereexistsnite,positiveconstants1;2suchthat16jp(t;t0)j62;8(tt00). ThefundamentaltheoremisstatedinTheorem 3.5.7 whichnoteshowconditionsonthestabilitymodescanguaranteestabilityofthesystem.Theproofisnotpresentedhere;however,suchaproofisgivenintheliterature[ 86 ]. 70

PAGE 71

Theorem3.5.7. SupposethatA(t)hasapolesetofP.ThenthesystemofEquation 3{42 isuniformlyexponentiallystableifandonlyifpicorrespondstoanexponentiallystablemodefori2[1;n]. 3.5.3SpecialCases SpecialcasesdoexistwherethematrixfunctionA(t)isneitherconstantwithtimenorcontinuouslyvaryingwithtime.Infact,A(t)canfollowthenatureofaT-periodicsystemoronewithanitetime-variation. Recallingthefactthataperiodicstateequationcanequalatime-invariantstateequationbymeansofaFloquetdecomposition[ 39 ];Itcanbeshownthatthetime-invarianteigenvaluesdeterminethestabilityoftheequivalentperiodicstateequationandarecalledcharacteristicexponents[ 25 ].Thissetofcharacteristicexponentscanthenbesaidtoformapolesetoftheperiodicstateequation.Moreprecisely,supposethatAisT-periodic;thatis,thereexistsaniteT0suchthatA(t+T)=A(t)forallt2R.Thenitcanbeshown[ 86 ]thatthecharacteristicexponentsofAareapolesetofA. Whenthematrixfunction,A(t),hasanitetime-variation;thatisA(t)isconstantoutsideaniteinterval,itcanbesaidthatthefrozen-timeeigenvaluesformapolesetofA.Asmentionedearlier,thisisnotthecasewhenA(t)iscontinuouslyvaryingwithtime.Itisdirectlyduetothefactthatthefrozen-timeeigenvaluesmayormaynotcontaininformationabouttheoriginalstateequation,equation 3{42 .Moreprecisely,supposethatthereexistsaniteT>0suchthatA(t)=ATforalltT.Thenitcanbeshown[ 86 ]thesetoffrozen-timeeigenvaluesfi(t)gni=1satisfyingdet(A(t))]TJ /F5 11.955 Tf 12.53 0 Td[(i(t)I)=0ateacht2R+isapolesetofA. 3.6MethodologyComparisons Theeigenstructureforalineartime-varyingsystemcanbefoundbyvariousmethodologies,yeteachisspecictoitsown.Individualmethodsaredevelopedfromabasicsetofassumptionsspecictothemathematicalapproachitisbuiltupon,andthereforepossessesitsowncomparativeadvantages. 71

PAGE 72

Kamen'smethodinvolvescomputinganth-orderinput-outputdierenceequationwithtimevaryingcoecients.Thisdierenceequationisbasedonthesystem'slineartime-varyingdynamics,andfromit,anorderedpairofrightandlefteigenvaluescanbecalculated.Therighteigenvaluesarethenusedtodescribethesystem'stransientperformanceandstability.AfewbenetsofKamen'smethodinclude Arightpoleset,p21(t);p22(t),canbelinkedtothetime-invariantsystemviainitialconditions(frozentimeeigenvaluesatt=tdesired) TheVandermondematrix,V(t),diagonalizesthesystemmatrixwhenV(t)isinvertibleandbounded ThecalculatedLTVpolesareuniqueforalmostallinitialconditions Integratingtherightpolesetcaninuencethestabilityofthesystem whereas,thedisadvantagesinclude LTVpolescansometimeshaveanite-timesingularity,resultinginp21(t);p22(t)! Higherordersystemsaremorediculttoconvertintoaninput-outputordinarydierentialequation ZhuandJohnson'smethodalsoutilizesthenth-orderinput-outputdierenceequation,butinadditionaddsastatespaceapproachbyndingasimilaritytransformation,L(t),withdet(L(t))=constant,suchthat_z=L)]TJ /F7 7.97 Tf 6.59 0 Td[(1(AL)]TJ /F1 11.955 Tf 15.65 3.02 Td[(_L)z.InsteadofdeningLTVpolesbyrightandleftsets,ZhuandJohnsonuseorderedpolessetscalledSeriesD-spectra(SD-spectra)andParallelD-spectra(PD-spectra).AdeningbenetofZhuandJohnson'smethod,isthattheLTVpolesetscanbederivedaswell-dened(freeofnite-timesingularities). O'BrienandIglesias'smethodintroducesastate-spaceonlyapproachtosolvingforthetime-varyingeigenstructure.ItisshownthatbyapplyingaQRdecompositiontothecalculatedtransitionmatirx,eigenvectorsandeigenvaluescanbecomputed.BenetstoO'BrienandIglesias'smethodinclude Polesgiveinformationonstabilitythroughassociatedstabilitymodes 72

PAGE 73

Stabilitymodesarealwayscalculatedbeforepoles,thereforeassuringthatthepolesarealwaysbounded Moresuitableforhigherordersystems StabilityispreservedthroughLyapunovtransformations whereas,thedisadvantagesinclude TheLTVpolesblowuparoundii=0,wherepii=_ii.ii Thismethoddoesnotalwaysdiagonalizethesystem TheLTVpolescannotbelinkedtothetime-invariantsystem TheLTVpolesarenon-uniqueduetothenon-uniquenessoftheQRdecomposition Wu'smethodintroducesaslightydierentapproachtosolvingforlineartime-varyingsystemsinthestate-spaceform.X-eigenpairs,fi(t);ui(t)g,arefoundbyevaluatingthematrixdierential, 3{36 ,withanonsingularmatrix,S(t),developedfromtheeigenvectorsofA(t).BenetsofWu'smethodinclude Thesystemmatrixcanalwaysbediagonalized Thex-eigenpairinuencesstability whereas,thedisadvantagesinclude Thex-eigenpairisnotnecessarilylinkedtotheinitialLTIsystem Thex-eigenpairisnotunique 73

PAGE 74

CHAPTER4LINEARTIME-VARYINGMODALANALYSIS 4.1SystemDynamics Theconceptofaneigenvalue/eigenvectoranditsrelationshiptomodaldynamicsiswelldenedfortime-invariantsystems[ 88 ];however,thissamerelationshipissomewhatunderdevelopedfortime-varyingsystems.Thepurposeofthischapteristointroducenewconceptsusedfortime-varyingmodalanalysis.Tobegin,areviewofsomebasictime-invariantconceptswillbegiven. 4.1.1LinearTime-InvariantSystems:Formulation AsystemisconsideredtobeLinearTime-Invariant(LTI)ifitexhibitsbothlinearityandtimeinvariance. Linearitycanbedenedasanyrelationshipbetweenasystem'sinputandoutput,suchthatitpreservestheoperationsofsuperpositionandscalarmultiplication.Thepropertiesofscalarmultiplicationandsuperpositionofalinearsystem,y=f(x),areshowninEquation 4{1 ,respectively. f(x)=f(x)f(x1+x2)=f(x1)+f(x2)(4{1) Time-invariancealsoreferstoshift-invariance,whichstatesthatifaninputtoasystemisshiftedbysometime,t,thentheoutputofthatsystemwillalsobetimeshiftedbyt,asshowninEquation 4{2 y(t)=f(t)y(t)]TJ /F1 11.955 Tf 11.96 0 Td[(t)=f(t)]TJ /F1 11.955 Tf 11.96 0 Td[(t)(4{2) Inotherwords,atime-invariantsystemisonewhosebehavior(itsresponsetoinputs)doesnotchangewithtime. ThefundamentalresultinLTIsystemtheoryisthatanyLTIsystemcanbecharacterizedentirelybyasinglefunctioncalledthesystem'simpulseresponse.The 74

PAGE 75

outputofthesystemissimplytheconvolutionoftheinputtothesystemwiththesystem'simpulseresponse.Thismethodofanalysisisoftencalledthetimedomainpoint-of-view.Thesameresultistrueofdiscrete-timelinearshift-invariantsystemsinwhichsignalsarediscrete-timesamples,andconvolutionisdenedonsequences Equivalently,anyLTIsystemcanbecharacterizedinthefrequencydomainbythesystem'stransferfunction,whichistheLaplacetransformofthesystem'simpulseresponse(orZtransforminthecaseofdiscrete-timesystems).Asaresultofthepropertiesofthesetransforms,theoutputofthesysteminthefrequencydomainistheproductofthetransferfunctionandthetransformoftheinput.Consequently,convolutioninthetimedomainisequivalenttomultiplicationinthefrequencydomain MostLTIsystemconceptsaresimilarbetweenthecontinuous-timeanddiscrete-time(linearshift-invariant)cases. 4.1.2LinearTime-InvariantSystems:Response ConsideranLTIsystemdenedbyadierentialequation,asrepresentedinEquation 4{3 oritsequivalentstate-spacerepresentation,asrepresentedinEquation 4{4 xn+a1xn)]TJ /F7 7.97 Tf 6.59 0 Td[(1+:::+an)]TJ /F7 7.97 Tf 6.58 0 Td[(1_x+anx=p(t)(4{3) _x=Ax+Bu(4{4) Thecompletesolution,x(t),ofEquation 4{3 isderivedfromtwoparts,theparticularsolution(forcedresponse)andthecomplimentarysolution(naturalresponse).Theparticularsolutiondependsonthefunctionalformoftheinput,p(t),whilethecomplimentarysolutionisfoundbysettingtheinputfunctiontozeroandsolvingtheassociatedhomogeneousdierentialequation.Forthepurposesofthispaper,onlythecomplimentaryornaturalresponsewillbeconsidered. Foradynamicsystem,boththenaturalandforcedresponseconsistsofatransientandsteady-stateportion.Thetransientresponseisdenedastheresponsegeneratedby 75

PAGE 76

thesystem'schangefrominitialconditiontonalstate,whereasthesteady-stateresponseisdenedasthebehaviorofthesystem'soutputastimegoestoinnity. TheunforcedornaturalresponseforeachstatecanthenbedescribedasthesolutiontohomogeneoussolutiontoEquation 4{4 ,asseeninEquation 4{5 x(t)=nXi=1viexpit(4{5) TheeigenvectorisshowninEquation 4{5 asvi,whiletheeigenvaluesarerepresentedbyi.TakingthederivativeonbothsidesofEquation 4{5 andsubstitutingintheunforcedversionofEquation 4{4 for_x,resultsinthewellknowneigenvector-eigenvaluerelationshowninEquation 4{6 Ax=x(4{6) 4.1.3LinearTime-VaryingSystems:Formulation Lineartime-Varying(LTV)systemssharethesamelinearpropertiesasthepreviouslymentionedLTIsystem,yettheLTVsystemisnottime-invariantorshift-invariant.Thisfactsuggeststhatifaninputtoasystemisshiftedbysometime,t,thentheoutputofthatsystemwillnotbetimeshiftedbythesamet,asshowninEquation 4{7 y(t)]TJ /F1 11.955 Tf 11.96 0 Td[(t)6=f(t)]TJ /F1 11.955 Tf 11.96 0 Td[(t)(4{7) Assumingthatthelineartime-varyingstateequationisdenotedinstate-spaceform,asshowninEqutaion 4{8 ,andthatAisacontinuous,uniformlyboundedfunction(A2CL1),thenthestatespacerealizationcanbeshowntohavetheformdescribedbyEquation 4{9 _x(t)=A(t)x(t);x(0)=x0(4{8) 76

PAGE 77

G:=264A B C D375=8><>:_x(t)=A(t)x(t)+B(t)u(t)y(t)=C(t)x(t)+D(t)u(t)9>=>;(4{9) ItwillalsobeassumedthateachcoecientmatrixgeneratedbyG,isagainanelementofthecontinuous,uniformlyboundedspace(CL1). Forthecaseofmultivariablelinear,time-varyingsystems,aneigenstructureequation,reminiscentoftheclassicallydenedeigenvector-eigenvalueequationforconstantmatrices(Equation 4{6 ),canbedenedandshownasEquation 4{10 (A(t))]TJ /F5 11.955 Tf 11.96 0 Td[(pi(t)I)x(i)(t)=_x(i)(t);i=1;:::;n(4{10) InEquation 4{10 ,thetime-varyingeigenvalueisdenedaspi(t),wheretheassociatedtime-varyingeigenvectorisdenedasx(i)(t).Thestabilityofthestateequation,Equation 4{8 ,hasbeenshowntohavearelationdirectlylinkedtothebehaviorofthetermsinEquation 4{11 [ 126 ];[ 127 ]. Zt0pi()dx(i)(t);i=1;:::;n(4{11) Thestabilityofthestateequationhasalsobeenshowntohavearelationdirectlyrelatedtothemodesasscoiatedwitheachpolepi(t)[ 86 ];[ 130 ];[ 131 ],asshowninEquation 4{12 Zt0pi()d;i=1;:::;n(4{12) 4.1.4LinearTime-VaryingSystems:Response First,considerthetime-varyingresponseequationdenedusingthemodedenitionsprovidedbyWu[ 126 ]andKamen[ 59 ],asshowninEqaution 4{13 x(t)=nPi=1Cii(t)exphRt0pi()dix(t)=nPi=1Cii(t)(4{13) 77

PAGE 78

InEquation 4{13 ,thetime-varyingpoles,pi,arecomposedsuchthatpi:R+!C,whilethetime-varyingeigenvectors,i,arecomposedsuchthati:R+!CN.Itshouldbenotedthatthetime-varyingeigenvectorsareassumedtobedierentiableforalltime,tandthateacheachlinearly-independentsolution,i(t),canbedenedasamodeofthesystem[ 126 ]. Asecondtime-varyingresponseequationcanbedenedusingthemodedenitionsprovidedbyO'Brien[ 86 ],asshowninEqaution 4{14 x(t)=A(t;0)x0(4{14) InEquation 4{14 ,A(t;0)isrepresentativeofthetime-varyingstatetransitionmatrixandcanberelatedtothetime-varyingpolesandeigenvectorsviaEquation 3{51 BothEquation 4{13 and 4{13 mayberearrangedsuchthatarelationshipcanbedevelopedbetweenthetime-varyingpoles/eigenvectorsandthecoeeicentmatrix,A(t).ThisrelationshipisdeemedanLTVEigenrelation[ 112 ],anddependingonthetime-varyingalgorithmused,canbeshownaseitherEquation 3{29 3{32 ,or 3{49 .Anysetoftime-varyingpolesandeigenvectorsthatsatisfytheseequationswillbereferredtoasanLTVEigenpair[ 112 ]. GiventhisdenitionofanLTVeigenpair,itcanbeshownthatneitherthestabilitynorthefrequencycharacteristicsofanLTVsystemcanbedeterminedfromeithertheLTVpolesoreigenvectorsalone.Instead,eacheigenpairmustbeanalyzedtogetherasawhole.SinceLTIanalysistechniquesarebasedontheassumptionthatstabilityandoscillatorycharacteristicsareisolatedwithinthepoles,newanalysistechniquesareclearlynecessary. 4.2ModalInterpretation:Kamen Considertheoscillatoryresponseofa2-statesystem,asoriginallygiveninEquation 3{10 ,withthecoecientsnormalizedtoeasepresentationasinEquation 4{15 .SubstitutethedenitionofmodeintermsofpolesfromEquation 3{9 togenerateEquation 4{16 .Also, 78

PAGE 79

assumethegeneralizedpolestobecomplexconjugatessuchthatp21=p22=pR+|pIasinEquation 4{17 .ThecomplexexponentialscanthenbeexpressedintermsofsinesandcosinesasinEquation 4{18 andcombinedtogenerateEquation 4{19 x(t)=1(t)+2(t) (4{15) =eRt0p21()d+eRt0p22()d (4{16) =eRt0(pR()+|pI())d+eRt0(pR()+|pI())d (4{17) =eRt0pR()dcosZt0pI()d+|eRt0pR()dsinZt0pI()d+eRt0pR()dcosZt0pI()d)]TJ /F5 11.955 Tf 11.96 0 Td[(|eRt0pR()dsinZt0pI()d (4{18) =2eRt0pR()dcosZt0pI()d (4{19) AnoscillatoryresponsewithdecayisdemonstratedinEquation 4{19 tobegeneratedbyapairofpoleswhicharecomplexconjugates.Thenatureoftheoscillationsandthedecayarebothdeterminedbytheintegralsofrealandimaginarypartsofthesepoles.Also,theequal-but-oppositenatureoftheimaginarypartsofthesepolesmeanstheresponseinEquation 4{19 issimplydoubletherealpartofthemodeasnotedinEquation 4{18 4.2.1Damping Thedecayingnatureoftheresponse,whichissimilartothedampingratioofalineartime-invariantsystem,isdeterminedbythevaryingmagnitudeoftheexponentialinEquation 4{19 .TheresultingenvelopeisgiveninEquation 4{20 usingtherealpartofthepoleandequivalentlyinEquation 4{21 byaddingthecomplex-conjugatepoles. envelope(x(t))=eRt0pR()d (4{20) =eRt0p21()+p22() 2d (4{21) 79

PAGE 80

4.2.2Frequency Theoscillationsoccurwithafrequencyrelatedtotheimaginarypartofthetime-varyingpole.Atime-varyingequivalenttonaturalfrequency,!(t),isgeneratedbycomparingthecosinetermofEquation 4{19 toastandardtermindynamicsofcos(!t).Thetime-varyingequivalenttoanaturalfrequencyresultsfromthiscomparisonandisgiveninEquation 4{22 .Notethatanystablesystemwillhave!tendto0astimeincreases. !(t)=Rt0pI()d t(4{22) TheperiodicityoftheoscillationsresultsdirectlyfrominvertingthefrequencyofEquation 4{22 andisgiveninEquation 4{23 .Alternatively,suchperiodicitycanresultsimplybynotingwhentheangleinthecosinetermrepeatsitselfasgiveninEquation 4{24 T(t)=2t Rt0pI()d (4{23) =maxT>02R2 2T:Zt0pI()d=Zt+T0pI()d=0 (4{24) Also,atime-varyingequivalenttodampingratioiscomputedbyrelatingtheenvelopeofEquation 4{20 andthefrequencyinEquation 4{22 .Essentially,theenvelopeisequivalentto)]TJ /F5 11.955 Tf 9.3 0 Td[(!nandthefrequencyisrelatedto!np 1)]TJ /F5 11.955 Tf 11.95 0 Td[(2.theresultingdampingratioisgiveninEquation 4{25 (t)=vuut 1 1+Rt0pI()d Rt0pR()d2(4{25) 80

PAGE 81

4.3ModalInterpretation:O'Brien 4.3.1DampingandNaturalFrequency Considerthesame2-stateoscillatorysystemdescribedbyEquation 3{10 ,butnowrepresentedasthestate-spacesystemshowninEquation 4{4 Theresponseofthesystem'sdynamicswillvaryinmagnitudeaccordingtotheassociatedstability.Theparameterofdampingisusedtodescribetherateofvariationinthisresponsewithpositivedampingusedforstablesystemsthatdecaytozeroandnegativedampingusedforunstablesystemsthatgrowtoinnity. Therateofmagnitudevariationcanbeextractedfromthepairofpolesassociatedwiththemode.Considerthatthetime-invariantdynamicshavecomplex-conjugatepoleswith1=2=R+|IsoR=1+2 2.Asimilarrelationholdsforthepolesofthetime-varyingsystemasshowninEquation 4{26 envelope(x(t))=expp1(t)+p2(t) 2(4{26) Simulationresultssuggeststhatthetime-varyingfrequencyoftheoscillatorybehaviorcanbeapproximatedbythedominantzero-crossingperiodicityoftheeigenvectors.Forsimplicty,anapproximationisformulatedbyassumingthesystemresponsemaintainsasinusoidalnature.Inthiscase,thematricesderivedbydecomposingthestate-transitionmatrixwillalsohaveasinusoidalnature.Abasicpropertyofanysinusoidgivenasx(t)=sin(!t)hasx(t)=)]TJ /F5 11.955 Tf 9.3 0 Td[(!2sin(!t)sothefrequencyofoscillationisgeneratedby!=q )]TJ /F7 7.97 Tf 10.99 4.71 Td[(x x.Therefore,theresultingfrequencyofthetime-varyingsystemmaybeapproximatedbyEquation 4{27 !i(t)2r )]TJ /F5 11.955 Tf 10.49 8.09 Td[(qii qii(4{27) 81

PAGE 82

4.3.2ModeShapes Systemdynamicsoftenutilizemodeshapestodescribetheactualmotionofavehicle.Essentially,amodeshapepresentstherelativemagnitudebetweenstateswhichisindependentofanydecayoroscillations.Thesemodeshapesarenormallyfounddirectlyfromthetime-invariant,scalereigenvectorsderivedinEquation 4{6 .Unfortunately,thetime-varyingeigenvectorsfoundinthispaperdocontainfrequencyinformationandthereforearemorediculttointerpret. AmodeshapeisgeneratedbynotingtherelationshipbetweentheQandRmatrices;specically,considerthescalarvalues,rij(t),oftheupper-triangularmatrixgivenasR(t)andthecolumns,qi(t),oftheunitarymatrixgivenasQ(t). x(t)=nXj=1jXi=1qjrijxj()(4{28) Amodeshapecanbeimmediatelyrealizedfromtherstcolumn,q1(t)oftheQ(t)matrix.Thismodeshapeisidentiedbyconsideringthemotionthatwouldresultfromaninitialconditioninwhichtheonlynon-zerocomponentistherststate.Theresultingresponseissimplyascalar,r11(t)x1(),multipliedbythevectorofq1(t)asshowninEquation 4{29 .Themodeshapewhichdescribestherelativevariationsbetweeneachstateisthusgivenasv1(t)=q1(t). x(t)=q1(t)r11(t)x1()ifx()=[x1()0:::0] (4{29) =v1(t)r11(t)x1() (4{30) AnothermodeshapeisthendeterminedasacombinationoftherstandsecondcolumnsoftheQmatrix.Considertheresultingmotiongivenaninitialconditioninwhichonlythesecondstatehasanon-zerocomponent.ThemodeshapeinresponsetothismotionisactuallytheparentheticalexpressioninEquation 4{32 whichismultipliedbythescalarsofr22(t)andx2()togeneratetheresponse. 82

PAGE 83

x(t)=(q1r12+q2r22)x2()ifx()=[0x2()0:::0] (4{31) =q1(t)r12(t) r22(t)+q2(t)r22(t)x2() (4{32) =v2(t)r22(t)x2() (4{33) AgeneralizedexpressionforamodeshapeiscomputedbyextendingEquation 4{30 andEquation 4{33 tonth-ordersystems.SuchanexpressionisgiveninEquation 4{34 vi(t)=iXj=1qj(t)rji(t) rii(t)(4{34) Theresponseofthemorphingaircraftiswrittenintermsofthegeneralizedmodeshape,vi(t),fromEquation 4{34 .ThisresponseisalinearcombinationofthemodeshapesasshowninEquation 4{35 x(t)=nXi=1vi(t)rii(t)xi()(4{35) 4.4Example:SimpleMechanicalSystem Tohelpillustratetheconceptofdeterminingthelineartime-varyingpolesandstabilitymodes,usingaQRdecomposition[ 86 ],asimplesecondordersystemwillrstbeanalyzed.Inthisanalysis,correlationstolineartime-invariantsystemswillbemadeforthepurposeofcharacterizinglineartime-variantdynamicmodalproperties.Thisexampleiscomposedofamass-spring-dampersystem,asshowninFigure 4-1 ,andwillonlyconsiderthehomogeneousorunforcedsolution.Inaddition,anassumptionwillbemadethatthewheelsattachedtothecartarefrictionless. TheparametersforthisexamplearelistedinTable 4-1 ,whereitisseenthatonlythedampingcoecientchangeswithtime. Themassanddampingcoecientarechangedwithtime,asshowninEquation 4{36 ,insuchamannerthatthesystemexperiencesanincreaseinmassandspansallthree 83

PAGE 84

Figure4-1. Mass-Spring-DamperSystem Table4-1. Mass-spring-dampersystemparameters Parameterst=0st=20st=30s M(kg)279.5K(N/m)888C(Ns/m)0812011.5 dampingcharacteristics,simultaneously.Astimeprogresses,thesystemtransitionsfrominitiallybeingunderdampedandlighttocriticallydampedandmoderate,andnallytooverdampedandheavy.Thevaluesforthesetime-varyingmasses/dampingratiosandtheircorrelatedtimesareshowninTable 4-1 C(t)=0:4(t)M(t)=2+0:25(t)(4{36) StartingfrombasicprincipalsandNewton'ssecondlaw,asseeninEquation 4{37 ,theordinarydierentialequationdescribingthesystem'sdynamicscanbederived,asshowninEquation 4{40 .ItcanbeseenfromEquations 4{39 and 4{40 thatthetimerateofchangeinmass,_M(t),isrepresentativeofinertialeectsonthesystemanddirectlymodiesthecontributionofthetime-varyingdampingseeninthea1(t)coecient. 84

PAGE 85

F=d(Mv) dt (4{37) =Mdv dt+vdM dt (4{38) =Mx+_x_M (4{39) x+C(t)+_M(t) M(t)_x+K M(t)x=x+a1(t)_x+a0(t)x=0 (4{40) Fromobservation,itisdeterminedthatanequivalentstate-spacecanonicalrepresentationofEquation 4{40 canbeformedandshownasEquation 4{41 Ax+Bu=26401)]TJ /F5 11.955 Tf 9.3 0 Td[(a0(t))]TJ /F5 11.955 Tf 9.3 0 Td[(a1(t)375264x1x2375+264b1b23750(4{41) Thetwostatesofthesystem,representedinEquation 4{41 ,arethedisplacementposition,x,andtherateofchangeindisplacementposition,_x.Itisalsonotedthatthecoecientsfoundinthestate-spacestatematrix,a0(t)anda1(t),canberepresentedasfunctionsshowninEquations 4{42 and 4{43 a0(t)=8>>>><>>>>:0:t08 2+0:25t:0>>><>>>>:0:t00:2t+0:25t 2+0:25t:0
PAGE 86

Whenassumingthatinertialeectscanbeneglected,thenEquation 4{40 reducestotheEquation 4{44 andthestate-spacecoecient,a1(t),canberewrittenasshowninEquations 4{45 x+C(t) M(t)_x+K M(t)x=x+a1(t)_x+a0(t)x=0 (4{44) a1(t)=8>>>><>>>>:0:t00:2t 2+0:25t:0
PAGE 87

Thesystemresponseforeachcase,asshowninFigure 4-2 ,showthatthestatesinitallyoscillatebeforeeventuallyconverginguponasteadystateequilibriumvalue.Thisconvergenceoccursroughlyaroundtensecondsfortheinertialcaseandaround20secondsforthenon-inertialcase. A B Figure4-3. Time-VaryingModes:A)Non-Inertal:Mode1(|),Mode2()-221()-223()]TJ /F1 11.955 Tf 33.2 0 Td[()B)Inertial:Mode1(|),Mode2()-222()-222()]TJ /F1 11.955 Tf 33.21 0 Td[() ReferencingFigure 4-3 ,itiscleartoseethatthemodalresponses,forbothinertialandnon-inertialcases,alsoexhibitaperiodofdecayingoscillationsbeforenallyconverginguponzero.Notethattheconvergencewindowineachcaseisthesameasthatpreviouslyseeninthesystemresponses.Itshouldalsobenoticedthatbothmodesforeachcaseareboundedbysomeconstant,,andconvergetozeroastimegoestoinnity,thereforesuggestingthatthesystemmodesareasymptoticallystable[ 86 ].Animportantobservationtonoteisthatwhenthemodesapproachzero,thecorrespondingpolesbecomeincreasinglyill-conditioned.Theill-conditioningisbroughtaboutbythederivationofanLTVpole,asshowninSection 3.5 ,whichisdenedbydividingamode'stimerateofchangebythemodeitself.Therefore,whenthevalueofeachmodecrossesbelowsomepre-determinedthreshold,thepolevalueisceasedtobecalculated,asshowninFigures 4-4A and 4-4B 87

PAGE 88

A B Figure4-4. Time-VaryingPoles:A)Non-Inertal:Pole1()-221()-223()]TJ /F1 11.955 Tf 33.2 0 Td[(),Pole2()-221()]TJ /F1 11.955 Tf 27.23 0 Td[(),RealportionofdiscreteLTIpoles(|),Poleaverage()B)Inertial:Pole1()-219()-219()]TJ /F1 11.955 Tf 33.14 0 Td[(),Pole2()-218()]TJ /F1 11.955 Tf 27.15 0 Td[(),RealportionofdiscreteLTIpoles(|),Poleaverage() Theassociatedpolesforthemass-spring-dampersystem,showninFigure 4-4A ,arefoundtooscillate,inanequal-but-oppositefashion,aboutalinedrawnthroughtheaverageofthetwoLTVpoles,(pole1+pole2)=2.Thispoleaverageisfoundtomatch,atdiscretepointsintime,therealpartofthecomplex-conjugateLTIpoles,asshowninFigure 4-4A .AnotableobservationisthatboththeLTIandLTVcomplex-conjugatepolessharethesamesimilarity,suchthattheaverageofthetwocomplex-conjugatepolesequaltherealpartsofeachLTIpole.ThisobservationsuggeststhatthemodaldampingforanLTVsystem,excludinginertialeects,isdirectlyrelatedtotheaverageofitsoscillatingpolepairsandcanbeapproximatedastheLTIdamping,asshownbyEquation 4{46 !LTV=(pole1+pole2)=2=Re(pLTI)(4{46) Thecorrespondingnon-inertialeigenvectors,asderivedinSection 4.3.2 ,canbeshowninFigure 4-5 Conversely,fromFigure 4-4B itisseenthatwheninertialeectsareincluded,theLTVpoleaveragedoesnotcorrespondwiththerealpartofthecomplex-conjugateLTI 88

PAGE 89

A B Figure4-5. Non-InertialTime-VaryingEigenvectors:A)Eigenvector1:(1,1)(|),(2,1)()-222()-222()]TJ /F1 11.955 Tf 33.21 0 Td[()B)Eigenvector2:(1,1)(|),(2,1)()-222()-222()]TJ /F1 11.955 Tf 33.21 0 Td[() poles.Instead,itisobservedthattheLTVpoleaveragediersfromtherealpartoftheLTIpolebyafactorroughlyequivalenttothemassrateofchange,_M.ThisfactsuggeststhatthedampingoftheLTVsystem,experiencingmassdisplacment,cannotaccuratelyberepresentedastherealpartsofeachLTIpole.Rather,thedampingoftheinertialLTVsystemcanberelatedtothediscreteLTIdampingbythesummationoftheLTVpoleaverageandthemassrateofchange,asshowninEquation 4{47 .ThecorrespondinginertialeigenvectorscanbeshowninFigure 4-6 !LTV=(pole1+pole2)=2=Re(pLTI))]TJ /F1 11.955 Tf 17.59 3.02 Td[(_M(4{47) Althoughsimilarintheory,theillustrativerepresentationofsuchacomplex-conjugatepolevariessignicantlyfromtheclassicallydenedLTIsystem[ 97 ]totherelativelynewdenedLTVsystem[ 86 ];[ 126 ].Thecomplex-conjugaterepresentationfortheaforementionedLTVsystemisshowninFigure 4-4A asanoppositephase,oscillatingpolepair.Frequencyinformation,however,isnotastrivialtondfromanoppositephase,oscillatingLTVpolepairasisthedamping.AsmentionedinSection 4.1.4 ,thefrequencyinformationissplitbetweenthepoleandeigenvector;therefore,neitherthe 89

PAGE 90

A B Figure4-6. InertialTime-VaryingEigenvectors:A)Eigenvector1:(1,1)(|),(2,1)()-222()-222()]TJ /F1 11.955 Tf 33.21 0 Td[()B)Eigenvector2:(1,1)(|),(2,1)()-222()-222()]TJ /F1 11.955 Tf 33.21 0 Td[() polenortheeigenvector,alone,canprovideacompleterepresentationofthetime-varyingfrequency.However,simulationresultssuggestthatasucientapproximationofthemodalfrequenciesmaybefoundbyreferringtotheperiodicityofthecolumnvectorsoftheorthonormalmatirx,Q,asshowninFigures 4-7 4-12 .AssumingthatQissinusoidalinnature,thenthisresultcanbeshownasthesamefrequencyapproximationderivedpreviouslyinEquation 4{24 A B Figure4-7. Non-InertialQcolumnvectorvalues:A)Q11(|),Q21()-221()-223()]TJ /F1 11.955 Tf 33.2 0 Td[()B)Q12(|),Q22()-222()-222()]TJ /F1 11.955 Tf 33.21 0 Td[() 90

PAGE 91

Figures 4-7A 4-7B representthecolumnsofthenon-inertial,time-varyingQmatrixwhichcorrespondtotheLTVpolesshowninFigure 4-4A .FromFigures 4-7A 4-7B ,itisseenthatthetermsQ11andQ22representthesameresponse,whilethetermQ12representsthesameresponseasQ21,justoutofphaseby180degreesorradians.Asaresult,theperiodicityforeachoftheseresponsesisidenticalandthereforesuggeststhatthemodalfrequencycanbefoundbyinvertingthemeasuredQcolumnperiodicityandmultiplyingby2,asshowninFigures 4-8 and 4-9 Figure4-8. Qcolumnperiodicity:Q11(|),Q21()-222()-222()]TJ /F1 11.955 Tf 33.21 0 Td[() Figure4-9. Qcolumnfrequency:ImaginarypartofdiscreteLTIpole(|),1Qcolumnperiodicity()-222()-222()]TJ /F1 11.955 Tf 33.21 0 Td[() 91

PAGE 92

Figures 4-10A 4-10B representtheinertialLTVQcolumnswhichcorrespondtotheLTVpolesshowninFigure 4-4B .ThesameconclusionscanbedrwanfromFigures 4-10A 4-10B ,asthatpreviouslydeterminedfromFigures 4-7A 4-7B .However,itshouldbenotedforthiscasethattheQtermsbecomeincreasinglyill-conditionedasthecorrespondingmodes,showninFigure 4-3B ,approachzero,asshowninFigures 4-6 and 4-10 .Thisconditionisadirectresultofthealgorithmusedtoanalyzethetime-varyingsystem. A B Figure4-10. InertialQcolumnvectorvalues:A)Q11(|),Q21()-222()-222()]TJ /F1 11.955 Tf 33.21 0 Td[()B)Q12(|),Q22()-222()-222()]TJ /F1 11.955 Tf 33.21 0 Td[() Aspreviouslyshown,themodalfrequencycanbefoundbyinvertingthemeasuredQcolumnperiodicityandmultiplyingby2.TheresultingQcolumnperiodictyandmodalfrequencyfortheinertialcasecanbeshowninFigures 4-11 and 4-12 ItcanbeseenfromFigures 4-9 and 4-12 thatthetime-varyingfrequencies(forboththeinertialandnon-inertialcases)aresimilartotheimaginarypartsofthetime-invariantpoles.Asaresult,itmaybeinferredforthisexample,thattheinclusionofinerialeectsdonotsignicantlyalterthefrequecyinformation;therefore,theimaginarypartsofthetime-invariantpolesmaybeusedtoapproximatethetime-varyingfrequency. 92

PAGE 93

Figure4-11. Qcolumnperiodicity:Q11(|),Q21()-222()-222()]TJ /F1 11.955 Tf 33.21 0 Td[() Figure4-12. Qcolumnfrequency:ImaginarypartofdiscreteLTIpole(|),LTVapproximatedfrequency()-222()-222()]TJ /F1 11.955 Tf 33.21 0 Td[() 93

PAGE 94

CHAPTER5CONTROLDESIGN 5.1InherentClosed-LoopNonlinearity Anymorphingsystem,regardlessofopen-looplinearity,willhaveaclosed-loopnonlinearityinthepresenceofstatefeedback[ 28 ].Theintroductionofthisnonlinearityhasbeenespeciallyproblematicforthecommunityinvestigatingactivesystems.Considerthatmorphingaircrafthavebeenextensivelystudiedbythecommunitybuthavefocusedpredominatelyonaerodynamicperformance[ 122 ]andmaterials[ 125 ].Inparticular,theseprogramshavedemonstratedclearbenetsofmorphingasmeasuredbyaerodynamicperformancerelatedtoliftanddrag[ 58 ].Aircrafthavebeenoptimized[ 18 ]usingmorphingtoimproveliftandminimizedragalongwithfuelconsumption[ 14 ],rangeandendurance[ 43 ],costandlogistics[ 15 ],actuatorenergy[ 93 ],andmaneuverability[ 99 ].Additionally,aeroelasticeectshavebeenoftenstudiedrelativetomaximumrollrate[ 66 44 9 ]andactuatorloads[ 77 ].Someinvestigationshaveconsideredcontrolofmorphingsystems;however,theydonotfullyaddressmanueveringight.Astudyusingpiezoelectricmaterialsdesignedcontrolonlytoachieveroll.[ 70 ]Avarietyofotherstudieshaveinvestigatedcontrolbutonlyinthecontextofacutationenergy[ 57 ]andcontrolauthority[ 19 ]forsimplechangesinightcondition.Otherstudieshaveconsideredmorphingforcontrolsurfacesbutnotassociatedcontrolsynthesis.[ 101 102 ]Also,astudydesignednonlinearcontrollersbutitsmorphingmodelusedsimplyadistributedsetofcontroleectorsratherthanashapewithfullytime-varyingdynamics.[ 117 ] Toillustratethenotionofthisinherentclosed-loopnonlinearity,rstconsidertheLIVgeneralizedmodel,asshowninEquation 5{1 .Thecorrespondingstatevectorisgivenasx2Rnwhilethecontroleectorisgivenas2R. _x=A()x+B()u(5{1) 94

PAGE 95

Assumingthereisnocontrolmatrix,B,andthatthestatedynamicshaveananedependence,usingA0;A1;A22Rnn,thenEquation 5{1 mayberewritteninthebilinearform[ 17 81 ],asshowninEquation 5{2 .Itshouldbenotedthatthemorphingrate,_,asseeninEquation 5{2 ,isgeneratedfromtheinclusionoftheinertialrates,_I,asdescribedinSection 2.3.1.2 _x=(A0+A1+A2_)x(5{2) Forthepurposeofsimplicity,themorphingrateterm,asshowninEquation 5{2 ,isassumedtobezero.Therefore,toachievegeneralizedfeedbackinthesystem,agenericcontrollaw,asdenedinEquation 5{3 ,isappliedtothenewlytruncatedformofEquation 5{2 =Kx(5{3) Asaresult,thegeneralizednonlinear(inthestates)expressioncanbedevelopedwhichdescribestheclosed-loopsystem,asseeninEquation 5{4 _x=(A0x+A1Kx2)(5{4) 5.2Quasi-StaticApproach 5.2.1Synthesis Quasi-staticvariationsareconsideredwhenthetimescalesofmorphingaremuchlessthanthetimescalesofmaneuvering.Suchquasi-staticmorphingisactuallythemostprevalentoftheschemesbeingadoptedforUAVandpilotedvehicles.ThevariablesweepontheF-14isanexampleofsuchaschemealongwiththevariablespanbeingproposedbyDARPA[ 123 ].Thequasi-staticmorphingisessentiallybeingusedtochangeightconguration,suchascruiseordive,relatedtosegmentsofthemissionprole.Theresultingdynamicsareslowlytime-varyingwithrespecttothemorphingduetothe 95

PAGE 96

disparity,whichmaybeordersofmagnitude,betweentimescalesofcongurationandmaneuvering. Thecontrollersneededtohandlethisquasi-staticmorphingwouldhavetobedesignedsuchthattheychosetheoptimalvalueofmorphingalongwithobtainingdesiredperformancemetricsformaneuvering.Ifitwereassumedthatanaircrafthadasetofslowactuatorstoalterightconguration,aswellas,asetoffastactuatorsformaneuvering,thenthefollowingactuationchoiceswouldensue.Thechoiceofmorphingactuationwouldbe,inessence,choosinganoptimaldesignfromwithinarangeadmittedbythemorphingscheme,whereasthechoiceofmaneuveringactuationwouldbeastandarddesignoftheautopilot. Asynthesismethodforthisapplicationwouldmostlikelybeformulatedasastandardmodel-followingapproachwhichallowedhandlingqualitiestobedirectlyutilized.Thecontrollerwouldseektocommandthemorphingsystem,P()=fA();B();C;Dg,torespondsimilarlytoadesiredsystem,X=f^A;^B;C;Dg,andtrackmaneuveringcommandsthroughouttheightenvelope.Therststepinthedesignprocesswouldneedtobethechoiceofmorphingvalueswhichminimizesthedierencebetweenthemorphingdynamicsandthedesireddynamics(forthemissionsegment),asinEquation 5{5 .Thenextstepwouldneedacontrollertocommandtheeectorsusedformaneuvering.ThiscontrollercouldbederivedfromtraditionalapproachesforrobustornonlinearsystemsasinEquation 5{6 =argmin2RW1kA())]TJ /F1 11.955 Tf 15.04 3.03 Td[(^Ak+W2kB())]TJ /F1 11.955 Tf 14.75 3.03 Td[(^Bk(5{5) K=argminK2SkX)]TJ /F5 11.955 Tf 11.96 0 Td[(Fl(P;K)k(5{6) 5.2.2Example:Gull-WingedAircraft Aninitialcontrollerhasbeensynthesizedforavariablegull-wingedaircraft[ 2 ].Asetofdesireddynamicswereformulatedforcruise-loiterandaggressive-maneuver 96

PAGE 97

r H() G P() 6 X() ? -e Figure5-1. Model-FollowingSystem congurationsbyvarying,forexample,frequencyoftheshort-periodmode.Thevalueofgull-wingmorphingisdeterminedusingEquation 5{5 toapproximatethesedesiredcharacteristics.AfeedbackcontrollerwasdesignedfromEquation 5{6 usinganinner-loopH1,G,andouter-loopPID,H,withgainschedulingacrossconguration,,asshowninFigure 5-1 .Apredenedmissionprolefromcruisetoaggressiveandbacktocruise,showninFigure 5-2 ,indicatesthatthemorphingvariedwithdesiredmodalpropertieswhiletheresponsestopitchdoubletstrackedthedesiredmaneuvers. Figure5-2. SimulationsoftheGull-MorphingAircraftModel Thisexampledemonstratestheeectivenessoftheapproach;however,severalissuesarenotyetrigorouslyaddressed.TherstissuewouldbedeningcomputationalstrategiesforEquation 5{5 whenvariousordersofpolynomials(A())wereusedwithmultipletypesofmorphing,.Asecondissuewouldinvolveconsiderationofndingastandardizedformulation,suchasLPV,wherethemaneuveringcontrollercouldinherentlyincludegainschedulingandrobustness. 5.3StabilizingControl:DisturbanceRejection 5.3.1Synthesis Aclassofsuboptimalcontrollersaresynthesizedfordisturbancerejection.Theabilitytorejectdisturbances,suchaswindgusts,isobviouslyanimportantfeatureofanyight 97

PAGE 98

controller.Theresultingclosed-loopsystemwillbeinherentlynonlinearduetotheeectsofstatefeedback;consequently,thecontrollerswillensuretheorigin,ortrimcondition,isgloballyasymptoticallystableforthesenonlineardynamics.[ 5 49 54 56 65 76 109 ] Anapproachfordisturbancerejectionhasbeenformulatedthatusesaconstant-gainmatrixforfeedback.ThisapproachguaranteesthedesiredstabilitypropertiesasstatedinLemma1.Essentially,theargumentresultsfromshowingthatalltrajectoriesoftheclosed-loopsystemareniteandconvergetozero. Lemma5.3.1. Giventhesystem,_x=(A0+A1)x,thentheoriginisgloballyasymptoticallystableusingthecontrollaw=Kxif 1. A0<0 2. A1K)]TJ /F5 11.955 Tf 16.14 0 Td[(A0<0 Proof:Theclosed-loopsystemisformulatedas_x=A0x+A1Kx2whichisobviouslynonlinear.Thesolutiontothisdierentialequationcanbeexpressedasx(t)=)]TJ /F11 7.97 Tf 6.58 0 Td[(A0 A1K)]TJ /F11 7.97 Tf 6.59 0 Td[(A0e)]TJ /F12 5.978 Tf 5.76 0 Td[(A0t.Inthiscase,thesteady-statevalueshowslimt!1x(t)=0ifA0<0soalltrajectoriesconvergetotheoriginifA0isnegativedenite.Asingularitywillalsoarisesuchthatlimt!1x(t)=1ifA1K)]TJ /F5 11.955 Tf 12.38 0 Td[(Aoe)]TJ /F11 7.97 Tf 6.59 0 Td[(A0t=0.Thissingularitycorrespondstot=)]TJ /F7 7.97 Tf 6.58 0 Td[(1 A0lnA1K A0whichhasasolutiont2Rwitht>0ifA0<0andK
PAGE 99

2. A1K1<0 Proof: Theclosed-loopsystemcanbeexpressedas_x=(A0+A1K0)x+(A1K2)x3.DeneaLyapunovfunctionasV(x)=1 2x2sothefollowingconditionsaresatised. 1. V(0)=0 2. V(x)0 3. _V(x)=(A0+A1K0)x2+(A1K2)x4 NowV(x)isavalidLyapunovfunction,andconsequentlytheoriginisgloballyasymptoticallystable,ifA0+A1K0<0andA1K2<0. 2 Animportantconsiderationistheformulationoftheopen-loopmodel.Specically,thesecontrollersassumetheLIVdynamicscanbeexpressedasarst-orderfunctionofthemorphinginput.Suchanassumptionwillrestrictthesystemswhichcanbeconsideredforcontrolsynthesis;however,therestrictionisnotnecessarilyunreasonable.Theexamplesinthispapercanbesatisfactorilymodeledasrst-orderfunctionsand,ifsecond-orderfunctionsareneeded,theLemmascanbeextendedtoconsiderhigherorders. Anotherconsiderationistheuseofcontroleectors.Thesedesignsassumethatshape,representedby,istheonlyeectorusedtorejectdisturbances.Theinclusionoftraditionaleectorscanbeconsideredbuttheinitialresultsassumemorphingistheonlyeectoravailableforcontrol. Also,thesecontrollersdonotguaranteeanypropertiesrelatedtoperformance.TheLemmasmerelyindicatethestabilityoftheoriginforthenonlinearclosed-loopsystem.Noinformationaboutthespeedatwhichresponsesconvergetotheorigincanbeprovided.Theseconditionsactuallyapplydirectlytoresponsesfrominititalconditionsandarenotevenformulatedtoconsiderotherperformancemetricssuchastrackingorrobustness.Assuch,theseresultsarelimitedinnaturetosimplestabilityforgustrejection. 99

PAGE 100

5.3.2Example:Chord-VaryingMorphing AnothermodeloftheMAVisgeneratedbyassumingapurevariationinchord.Thismodelindicatessomepropertiesoftheightdynamicsofachord-varyingmorphingwhilethespanandcamberarekeptconstant.Thechordforthismodelischosentorangefrom11.43cmto22.86cmwhilethespanremainsat60.96cm.TherepresentativemodelinTORNADO[ 80 ]resultedincongurationssuchasthoseshowninFig. 5-3 Figure5-3. Chord-VaryingMAVModel(m) TheLIVframeworkisagainusedtorepresenttheightdynamics.ThemodelinEq. 5{7 indicatesarst-orderttothestate-spacematricesfortheightdynamicsatasetofchordvalues.Theperturbationtochord,,rangesbetween0:05715m. _x=0BBBBBBB@266666664)]TJ /F1 11.955 Tf 9.3 0 Td[(0:075)]TJ /F1 11.955 Tf 9.3 0 Td[(0:1240)]TJ /F1 11.955 Tf 9.3 0 Td[(9:81)]TJ /F1 11.955 Tf 9.3 0 Td[(1:538)]TJ /F1 11.955 Tf 9.3 0 Td[(7:45612:0002:686)]TJ /F1 11.955 Tf 9.3 0 Td[(5:848)]TJ /F1 11.955 Tf 9.3 0 Td[(32:9340001:000377777775+266666664)]TJ /F1 11.955 Tf 9.3 0 Td[(0:330)]TJ /F1 11.955 Tf 9.3 0 Td[(2:09300)]TJ /F1 11.955 Tf 9.3 0 Td[(3:957)]TJ /F1 11.955 Tf 9.29 0 Td[(15:3310025:32495:187)]TJ /F1 11.955 Tf 9.3 0 Td[(160:16000003777777751CCCCCCCAx(5{7) ApairofcontrollersaredesignedusingLemma 5.3.1 andLemma 5.3.2 forthemodelinEq. 5{7 .ThismodelsatisestheconditionsoftheLemmasincludingstabilityfor=0.TheresultinggainsforthesecontrollersaregiveninTable 5-1 Table5-1. Gainsforchord-varyingaircraftdisturbancerejectioncontroller controlleralgorithm Lemma1=0)]TJ /F1 11.955 Tf 9.3 0 Td[(100:1xLemma2=[0]+0)]TJ /F1 11.955 Tf 9.3 0 Td[(10)]TJ /F1 11.955 Tf 9.3 0 Td[(0:5x2 100

PAGE 101

Responsestoagustfortheopen-loopsystemandclosed-loopsystemsareshowninFig. 5-4 .Theopen-loopsystemreturnstotrimtodemonstratetheexpectedstabilitywhenthechordisnotvariedfromthenominalcondition.Theclosed-loopsystems,usingLemma 5.3.1 andLemma 5.3.2 ,arealsostableandabletorejecttheinitialdisturbance. TheresponsesinFig. 5-4 indicatethatchord-varyingmorphingcanindeedbebenecialtorejectinggustssinceeachcontrollerreturnsthevehicletotrimfasterthantheopen-loopsystem.Theincreaseinrejectionisperhapsnotoverlysignicantbutatleastisclearlynoticeable.Thecontrollerchangesthechordwhichactuallyhastheeectofreducingthemomentofinertiaand,subsequently,increasingthestabilityderivatives.Astheactuationplotshows,thecontrollerreducesthechordtorejectthisdisturbancebutthencanquicklyincreasethechordtoreturntoaerodynamiceciency. Figure5-4. AngleofAttackResponseandAssociatedChordofAircraft TheabilityofthecontrollertoreturnthevehicletotrimisalsoevidentintheresponsesofallstatesasshowninFig. 5-5 .Eachstatereturnstoequilibriumalthoughtheratesofdecayintheoscillationsaftertheinitialdisturbanceclearlyvarybetweenresponses. Thebehaviorofthecontrollers,andconsequentlytheclosed-loopresponses,canbedeterminedfromFig. 5-5 inassociationwithTable 5-1 .Inparticular,thisassociationcanexplainthedierencesbetweenactuationresponsesinFig. 5-4 .ThechordvariationsusingthecontrollerofLemma 5.3.1 showanoscillatorynaturewhereasthechordvariations 101

PAGE 102

Figure5-5. ResponsestoChord-VaryingMorphing fromthecontrollerofLemma 5.3.2 settlestoaconstantsteady-statevalue.Thedierentbehaviorsiscausedbythelinearandquadraticnatureofthecontrollers.Essentially,asmallchordiscommandedbyscalingsmallvaluesofthestatesbutanevensmallerchordiscommandedbyscalingquadraticvaluesofthosesmallstates. 5.4FeedForwardOptimalControl 5.4.1State-ResponseTracking Morphingcanbeusedtotrackadesiredsignal,yd(t),forthesystemresponse.Theactualresponseisexpressedasy(t)=P((t))wheretheplantmodelisexplicitywrittenashavingtime-varyingdynamicsduetothemorphingcommand.Inthiscase,morphingisrestrictedtobetheonlycontroleector. Anoptimizationcomputesthemorphingcommandthataddressestracking.Thisoptimizationsearchesoverthemorphingtrajectorytominimizethetrackingerrorateveryinstanceintime,asshowninEquation 5{8 min(t)s Zt0kyd(t))]TJ /F5 11.955 Tf 11.95 0 Td[(P((t))k2dt(5{8) 102

PAGE 103

SuchanoptimizationiseectivelyafeedforwardschemeasdepictedinFigure 5-6 .Thecompensatoractuallygeneratesanoptimaltrajectoryforthemorphingbasedonano-lineminimization yd (t) P((t)) -y Figure5-6. ArchitectureforState-ResponseTracking Suchafeedforwardelementrepresentsacriticalaspectofmanynonlinearcontrolschemes.Themorphingdynamicscertainlyhaveanonlineardependencyontheinputcommandsoamulti-elementcontrollerislikelynecessary.Someaspectoffeedbackmaybeutilizedfornoiseandrobustness;however,designingthisfeedforwardcontrollerisaninitialsteptowardsamulti-elementcontroller. 5.4.2Pole-ResponseTracking Amorphingcommandcanalsobegeneratedfortrackingofapoleresponse.Denepd(t)asthedesiredlocationfortime-varyingpoles.Suchdesiredpolescandirectlyrelatetotraditionalparametersoffrequencyanddamping.Assuch,thetrackingofapoleresponseisanalogoustotrackingofmodalparameters. Thepole,p(t),isnotedasbeingrelatedtothediagonalelementsofthedecompositionofthestate-transitionmatrix.Specically,theithtermisgivenaspi(t)=r)]TJ /F7 7.97 Tf 6.58 0 Td[(1ii((t))d/dt(rii((t)))whereriiisthediagonaltermofR(t)asconstrainedbyQ(t)R(t)=A(t;0).Note,thecompletepoleformulationmaybeseeninSection 3.5 TheoptimizationtocomputethemorphingcommandisgiveninEquation 5{9 min(t)s Zt0kpd(t))]TJ /F5 11.955 Tf 11.95 0 Td[(rii((t))_rii((t))k2dt(5{9) Suchoptimizationisagainafeedforwardscheme.Theblockdiagramforthisscheme,asshowninFigure 5-7 ,diersfromFigure 5-6 byincludingseveralelementsrelatedtothepoles.Specically,ablockofQRisincludedtorepresenttheQRdecompositionandablockofisincludedtorepresentthecomputationofthestate-transitionmatrix. 103

PAGE 104

pd (t) (P((t))) QR s ? -r)]TJ /F7 7.97 Tf 6.59 0 Td[(1ii_rii Figure5-7. ArchitectureforPole-ResponseTracking 5.4.3Example:Mass-SpringSystem 5.4.3.1System Amorphingmass-springsystemiscontrolledtotrackdesiredstateresponsesandpolesignals.Thissystem,asshowninFigure 5-8 ,isasinglemassattachedtoawallthroughaspringanddamper. Figure5-8. Mass-Spring-DamperSystem Controlisactuatedthroughthedamperofthissystem.Essentially,thedampingisassumedtobeadjustableinordertoalterthesystemdynamics.TheequationofmotionisthusgiveninEquation 5{10 .Thesedynamicsareobviouslydependentonthedampingsocommandingadampingtrajectorywillrequireanalysisusingtime-varyingpoles. mx=kx)]TJ /F5 11.955 Tf 11.95 0 Td[((t)_x(5{10) Themassis8kgandthespringconstantis2N/m. 5.4.3.2MorphingBasis Theoptimalmorphing,thatischosentogenerateasystemresponseorpoleresponsethattracksadesiredresponse,isrestrictedtobeingathird-orderpolynomialoftime.AnymorphingtrajectoryisthusrestrictedtoliewithinthesetofallpolynomialswithrealcoecientsasnotedinEquation 5{11 104

PAGE 105

23Xi=0itii2R(5{11) Also,thecoecientsofthemorphingtrajectoryareboundedtopreventthesystemfromimmediatelybecomingoverdamped.Thehigher-ordertermsinthepolynomialhavethepotentialtodominateastimeincreases;consequently,thesetermsarerestrictedmorethanthelower-orderterms.Theexactvaluesoftheseboundsaredeterminedsuchthatanymorphingtrajectoryallowsthesystemtovarybetweenunderdampedandoverdamped.ThevalueofthedampingratiogiveninEquation 5{12 representstheboundarybetweenunderdampedandoverdamped. =(t) 2p km(5{12) Boundsonthecoecientsareinitiallychosentolimitthetimeatwhichthesystembecomescriticallydampedto7.5s.Suchatimeisarbitrarilychosenforthisexamplebutmayeasilybealteredtoconsiderdierenttypesofresponses.Giventhistimeconstraint,thecoecientsofEquation 5{11 mustsatisfytheexpressionsinEquation 5{13 .Theprocedureactuallyndsthecoecientssequentiallybyconsideringonlyonecoecienttobeanon-zerovalueatatime.Indongso,thesolutiondeterminesthemaximumcontributionneededbyeachmorphingcoecienttoachievethedesireddampingtransient. iti 2p km=Pi(7:5)i 8=1i=1;2;3(5{13) Also,aconstraintisintroducedsuchthat(t)>0forallvaluesoftime.Thisconstraintnotesthatthedesiredresponseisassumedtobeboundedandthusthesystemmusthavepositivedamping.Thecoecientsofeachpolynomialareadditionallylimitedtomaintainthispositivecondition. TheresultingboundsonthecoecientsaregiveninTable 5-2 105

PAGE 106

Table5-2. Boundsoncoecientofmorphingbasis CoecientUpperBoundLowerBound 04-411.07-1.0720.14-0.1430.02-0.02 5.4.3.3TrackingaSystemResponse:PolynomialMorphing Asetofdesiredresponsesaregeneratedusingpolynomialmorphing.Thesepolynomialsrangeasarst-order,second-orderandthird-orderfunctions.TheoptimizedvaluesofthemorphingcommandsaregeneratedforfeedforwardcontrolandshowninTable 5-3 .TheoptimizedmorphingisessentiallyidenticaltothedesiredmorphingwhichisanticipatedsincethedesiredmorphingcanbeexactlyduplicatedbythemorphingbasisofEquation 5{11 Table5-3. Optimalpolynomialmorphingtotrackdesiredpolynomialmorphing desiredactual 0:5+t0:5+t0:5t+0:076t20:5t+0:076t2)]TJ /F1 11.955 Tf 9.3 0 Td[(0:75t+0:1t2+0:02t3)]TJ /F1 11.955 Tf 9.3 0 Td[(0:75t+0:1t2+0:02t3 Theoptimizedstateresponses,muchliketheoptimizedmorphingtrajectories,areessentiallyidenticaltothedesiredstateresponses.TheseresponsesareshowninFigure 5-9 Anotherdesiredresponseisattemptedtobetrackedusingthepolynomialmorphing;however,thisdesiredresponseisassociatedwithamorphingcomposedofasinusoidaladdedtoapolynomial.ThisdesiredmorphingcannotbeduplicatedusingtherestrictedbasisofEquation 5{11 sosomeerrormustresultinthetracking.TheoptimizedpolynomialformorphingisgiveninTable 5-4 alongwiththisdesiredmorphing. Table5-4. Optimalpolynomialmorphingtotrackdesiredsinusoidalmorphing desiredactual 0:94t+sin(t)0:5343+1:0700t)]TJ /F1 11.955 Tf 11.96 0 Td[(0:0812t2+0:0094t3 106

PAGE 107

A B C Figure5-9. DesiredResponse(|)andOptimalResponse()-222()-222()]TJ /F1 11.955 Tf 33.21 0 Td[()forA)First-OrderMorphingandB)Second-OrderMorphingandC)Third-OrderMorphing TheresultingstateresponseisshowninFigure 5-10 asreasonablyclosetothedesireresponse.Someerrorispresent;however,thedesiredmorphingisnotexcessivelyfaroutsidetherangeofthemorphingbasissothefeedforwardcontrolisnearlyabletoprovidethecorrecttracking. 5.4.3.4TrackingaSystemResponse:Piecewise-PolynomialMorphing Apiecewise-polynomialmorphingisconsideredtoexpandtherangeofthemorphingbasisseeninEquation 5{11 .Inthiscase,themorphingbasisisallowedtobearst-orderpolynomialwhosecoecientscanvaryatdiscretepointsintime.Anadditionalconstraint 107

PAGE 108

Figure5-10. DesiredResponse(|)andOptimalResponse()-221()-223()]TJ /F1 11.955 Tf 33.2 0 Td[()forSinusoidalMorphing ofcontinuityisimposedonthispiecewise-polynomialmorphingtoensurephysicalactuatorscouldpotentiallyimplementsuchacommand. Anoptimalvalueofpiecewise-polynomialmorphingisgeneratedtotrackadesiredresponsethatcontainsasinusoid.TheresultingcommandisgiveninTable 5-5 alongwiththemorphingassociatedwiththedesiredresponse. Table5-5. Optimalpiecewise-polynomialmorphingtotrackdesiredsinusoidalmorphing desiredactual 0:94t+sin(t)0:068+1:734t:0t1:521:959+0:399t:1:52
PAGE 109

Figure5-11. DesiredResponse(|)andOptimalResponse()-221()-223()]TJ /F1 11.955 Tf 33.2 0 Td[()forSinusoidalMorphing variousorders.Theoptimalmorphing,asgiveninTable 5-6 ,isabletoeectivelymatchthemorphingassociatedwiththedesiredpoles. Table5-6. Optimalpolynomialmorphingtotrackdesiredpolynomialmorphing desiredactual 1:07t1:07t1+0:75t+0:024t21+0:75t+0:024t2)]TJ /F1 11.955 Tf 9.3 0 Td[(0:2t+0:13t2+0:039t3)]TJ /F1 11.955 Tf 9.3 0 Td[(0:2t+0:13t2+0:039t3 Theoptimizedpolesignals,muchliketheiroptimizedmorphingtrajectories,areessentiallyidenticaltothedesiredpolesignals.Formodalreasons,thepolesignalswillbetruncatedat10seconds.ThesesignalsareshowninFigure 5-12 Anotherpoleresponseisattemptedtobetrackedusingthepolynomialmorphing.Thisdesiredresponseisagainassociatedwithamorphingcomposedofasinusoidaladdedtoapolynomial.Duetodampingconstraints,itremainsthesamedesiredsinusoidalmorphingasthatusedforthestateresponse.TheoptimizedpolynomialformorphingisgiveninTable 5-7 alongwiththisdesiredmorphing. Table5-7. Optimalpolynomialmorphingtotrackdesiredsinusoidalmorphing desiredactual 0:94t+sin(t)0:8532+0:7648t)]TJ /F1 11.955 Tf 11.96 0 Td[(0:1248t2+0:0200t3 109

PAGE 110

A B C Figure5-12. DesiredResponse(|)andOptimalResponse()-221()-223()]TJ /F1 11.955 Tf 33.2 0 Td[()forA)First-OrderMorphingandB)Second-OrderMorphingandC)Third-OrderMorphing Althoughusingthesamedesiredmorphing,theoptimizedpolynomialinTable 5-7 isdierentfromthatinTable 5-4 .Thisresultissimplyduetotheoptimizationofadierentcostfunction. TheresultingpolesignalisshowninFigure 5-13 .Someerrorispresent;however,thefeedforwardcontrolisagainnearlyabletoprovidethecorrecttracking. 5.4.3.6TrackingaPoleResponse:Piecewise-PolynomialMorphing Thepiecewise-polynomialmorphingisusedtotrackapoleresponseassociatedwithasinusoidalmorphing.TheresultingmorphingandthedesiredtrajectoryaregiveninTable 5-8 110

PAGE 111

Figure5-13. DesiredResponse(|)andOptimalResponse()-221()-223()]TJ /F1 11.955 Tf 33.2 0 Td[()forSinusoidalMorphing Table5-8. Optimalpolynomialmorphingtotrackdesiredsinusoidalmorphing desiredactual 0:94t+sin(t)0:104+1:673t:0t1:522:182+0:269t:1:52
PAGE 112

5.5H1FeedbackControl:WithoutInertialEects Feedforwardcontrol,asshowninSection 5.4 ,isonemethodwhichcanbeusedforoptimaltracking,whileanotherisH1feedbackcontrol[ 21 23 55 61 100 129 ].H1controltypicallyachievesoptimalityfromderivingacontroller(robustorstabilizing)whichsolvessomemathematicaloptimizationproblem[ 29 45 48 ].Inthecaseoftracking,arobustcontrollerisusedandisdesignedsuchthatsomedesiredlevelofperformanceisobtained.Thisrobustcontrollermustbecapableofmaintainingperformancedespitetheinclusionofexogeneousinputsintothesystem,suchasnoise,disturbance,andreferencesignals.Whenallexogeneoussignalsareavailabletothesystem,theproblemisthenconsidera"fullinformation"H1problem[ 24 71 ],asshowninEquations 5{14 5{16 _x(t)=Ax(t)+B2w(t)+B1u(t) (5{14) z(t)=C1x(t)+D11w(t)+D12u(t) (5{15) y(t)=C2x(t)+D21w(t)+D22u(t) (5{16) Itshouldbenotedthatxrepresentsthesystemstatevariables,yisthesystemmeasuredoutput,zisthesystemcontroloutput,uisthesystemcontrol,andallstatematriceshaveproperdimensions.Itshouldbenotedhowever,thatthefullinformationassumptionrequiresthattheirbefullstate,disturbance,andcontrolfeedback,asdescribedbyEquation 5{17 C2=[I00]TD21=[0I0]TD22=[00I]T(5{17) TheexogeneousinputsinEquation 5{17 maybedescribedbyEquation 5{18 w(t)=[drn]T(5{18) 112

PAGE 113

Forthepurposesofthisstudy,the"fullinformation"standardwillbeappliedtothelineartime-varyingproblem.However,itisobviouswhentransformedintothebilinearform,Equation 5{1 cannotaccuratelybedescribedbythetime-invariantsystemdenedinEquations 5{14 5{16 .Therefore,Equations 5{14 5{16 mayberedenedforthebilineartime-invariantsystem[ 105 ],asshowninEquations 5{19 5{21 _x(t)=(A0+A1u(t))x(t)+B2w(t)+(B0+B1x(t))u(t) (5{19) z(t)=C1x(t)+D11w(t)+D12u(t) (5{20) y(t)=C2x(t)+D21w(t)+D22u(t) (5{21) Thisnewbilineartime-invariantsystemisbaseduponEquation 5{2 withouttheinertialcontribution,asshowninEquation 5{22 _x=A0x+A1xu(5{22) Itshouldbenotedthatthelineartime-invariantsystem,showninEquation 5{1 ,wasassumedtohaveananedependencewithinthestates.Fromthisresult,itwasfurtherassumedthatthelineartime-varyingsystemhadananedependencewithintheinputcommand,u(t),thusgivingtheformofabilinearsystem.Inmakingthisassumption,itisseenthatthetime-varyingdependencehasmovedoutsideofthestatematrixintothecontrolinput,u,andstatevariable,x.Thisfactsuggeststhatabilineartime-invariantcontrollermaybeusedtosucientlycontroltheunderlyingtime-varyingsystem[ 4 68 ]. InordertosimplifytheH1bilinearproblemandprovideareasonablesolution,thesimplifyingassumptions,showninEquation 5{23 ,needtobemade. 113

PAGE 114

DT12C1=0DT12D12=IB0DT12=0D21DT21=ID11sucientlysmall(5{23) FromEquation 5{23 ,itismentionedthatD11mustbesucientlysmall.ThissuciencysuggeststhatthemaximalsingularvalueofD11mustbesmallerthanthecorrespondingH1normoftheclosed-loopcontrolsystem.ItisalsoseenfromEquation 5{23 thatA0andB0mustbestabilizable;However,itisrecalledthatforthetime-varyingprobleminquestion,thereexistsnoexternalinputindependentofthestatecommand.Asaresult,ithasbeenshown[ 106 ]thattheoptimalcontrolofabilinearsystemcanbeachievedifandonlyifthereexistsascalar,r,suchthattherealpartsoftheeigenvaluesof(A0)]TJ /F5 11.955 Tf 12.77 0 Td[(r(A1+B1))arenegativeandthecostfunction,asseeninEquation 5{24 ,isminimized. J=1 2Z10fzT(t)z(t))]TJ /F5 11.955 Tf 11.95 0 Td[(2wT(t)w(t)gdt(5{24) BycombiningEquation 5{24 withthepartialderivativeoftheclosed-loopLyapunovfunction,,theHamiltonianfunctioncanbedenedandwrittenasEquation 5{25 H=1 2zTz)]TJ /F5 11.955 Tf 13.15 8.09 Td[(2 2wTw+T_x(5{25) SubstitutingEquations 5{19 5{21 intoEquation 5{25 resultsinEquation 5{26 ,fromwhichthemaximalexogeneousinputvectorandminimalcontrolcommandmaybefound. 114

PAGE 115

H=1 2(xTCT1C1x+xTCT1D11w+xTCT1D12(u+r)+(u+r)TDT12D11w+wTDT11D11w+(u+r)TDT12D12(u+r))-222(2wTw)+T(Ax+(A1+B1)x(u+r)+B2w) (5{26) Themaximalexogeneousinputvector,w,andminimalcontrolcommand,u,arefoundbytakingthepartialderivativeofEquation 5{26 ,respectively,andsettingitequaltozero.TheresultingoptimaltermscanbedescribedbyEquations 5{27 5{28 u=)]TJ /F5 11.955 Tf 9.3 0 Td[(r)]TJ /F1 11.955 Tf 15.95 8.09 Td[(1 2(D12D11BT2)]TJ /F5 11.955 Tf 11.95 0 Td[(xT(A1+B1)T)+xT(A1+B1)T(5{27) w=)]TJ /F1 11.955 Tf 13.3 8.09 Td[(1 2(DT11D12xT(A1+B1)T)]TJ /F5 11.955 Tf 11.96 0 Td[(BT2)(5{28) UsingthesimplifyingassumptionsfoundinEquation 5{23 ,theclosed-loopformoftheHamiltonianmaybefoundbysubstitutingEquations 5{27 5{28 backintoEquation 5{25 .Theresultingclosed-loopformoftheHamiltoniancanbeshownbyEquation 5{29 HCL=1 2(xTCT1C1x+(A0)]TJ /F5 11.955 Tf 11.95 0 Td[(r(A1+B1))+(A0)]TJ /F5 11.955 Tf 11.95 0 Td[(r(A1+B1))TT)-222((A1+B1)xxT(A1+B1)TT+1 2((A1+B1)xxT(A1+B1)TT+B2BT2T)]TJ /F1 11.955 Tf 12.44 3.16 Td[((A1+B1)xDT12D11BT2)]TJ /F1 11.955 Tf 12.45 3.16 Td[(B2DT11D12xT(A1+B1))) (5{29) Theclosed-loopLyapunovfunction,,forbilinearsystemshasbeenshowntobeaquadraticfunctionofthestatevector[ 10 62 69 79 32 ]andthereforecantaketheformshowninEquation 5{30 =1 2xTPx(5{30) 115

PAGE 116

ThepartialderivativeofEquation 5{30 canbetakenwithrespecttoxtond,asshowninEquation 5{31 =@ @x=xTP(5{31) SubstitutingEquation 5{31 intoEquation 5{29 givesthenalversionoftheclosed-loopHamiltonian,asshownbyEquation 5{32 HCL=1 2xT(CT1C1+P(A0)]TJ /F5 11.955 Tf 11.95 0 Td[(r(A1+B1))+(A0)]TJ /F5 11.955 Tf 11.96 0 Td[(r(A1+B1))TP)-222(P(A1+B1)xxT(A1+B1)P+1 2(P(A1+B1)xxT(A1+B1)P+PB2BT2P)]TJ /F5 11.955 Tf 11.96 0 Td[(P(A1+B1)xDT12D11BT2P)]TJ /F5 11.955 Tf 11.95 0 Td[(PB2DT11D12xT(A1+B1)TP))x (5{32) IthasbeenshownforbilinearsystemsthatthealgebraicRiccatiequationisderivedfromthelinearpartsoftheclosed-loopHamiltonianfunction[ 106 ].Therefore,thealgebraicRiccatiequationrelatedtoEquation 5{32 canbeshownbyEquation 5{33 [ 92 ]. P(A0)]TJ /F5 11.955 Tf 11.95 0 Td[(r(A1+B1))+(A0)]TJ /F5 11.955 Tf 11.95 0 Td[(r(A1+B1))TP+CT1C1+1 2PB2BT2P=0(5{33) ForthesingleinputbilinearsystemdescribedbyEquation 5{22 ,itcanbesaidthattheclosed-loopnonlinearsystemsfromtheH1statefeedbackcontrolaregloballyasymptoticallystableifandonlyifthefollowingconditionsaremet: (A0;B2)stabilizable (A0;C1)observable eig(A0)]TJ /F5 11.955 Tf 11.95 0 Td[(r(A1+B1))<0 Itshouldbenotedthattheconstantvalue,r,canbefoundusingmethodssuchastheRouthcriterion. 116

PAGE 117

5.6FutureWorkandChallenges Multipleavenueshavebeenestablishedtocontinuethecontrolworkpresentedthroughoutthispaper.Twoareasofparticularinterestwouldbethethoroughinvestigationandderivationofadynamiccontrolapproach,aswellas,theinclusionofaninertialtermwithinboththefeedforwardandH1feedbackoptimaizations. Fromthesetwotopics,theareaclosesttorealizationatthistimewouldbetheinclusionoftheinertialterm,_,asshowninEquation 5{2 .Therefore,themainfocusofthissectionwillprimarilycenteraroundtheconceptsandchallangessurroundingtheintroductionofthisterm. ItisclearlyseenfromSection 2.3.1.2 thatinertiaplaysacrucialroleinthedynamicoutcomeofthedescribedtime-varyingsystem.Typically,inertialeectsareneglectedduetotheirsmallinuenceonthedynamics;However,theeectsofinertiaintime-varyingsystemsarestillyettobefullyunderstood,althoughintialtestingsuggeststhatslightchangesininertiacouldbesignicantifunaccountedfor[ 47 ]. Anobviouschallengeregardingtheintroductionoftheinertialterm,_,intotheoptimalcontrolarchitectureisthedecisionofwhichtermtakesprecedence,themorphingangleorthemorphingrate?Thesetwotermsarelinkedthrougharstderivativerelationshipandthereforecannotbecontrolledindependently.Asaresult,theoptimizationproblembecomeseitherndingthecorrectratewhichproducesthedesiredmorphingtrajectoryorviceversa.Thekeytothisconceptisnotjustndingthecorrectterm,butratherndingthecorrecttermwhichminimizestheeectoftheotherandmaintainsthedesiredobjective. Beforethisproblemcanbeaddressed,theabilitytoeectlystabilizethesystemshouldrstbeconsidered.ItwasshowninSection 5.3.1 thatatime-varyingsystem,withoutinertia,couldbesuboptimallycontrolledwhileguaranteeinggloballyasymptoticstability.Anaddendumtothisillustrationwouldbetoaddtheinertialterm,asshowninEquation 5{2 ,andrederiveasubotpimalcontroller. 117

PAGE 118

StartingwithEquation 5{2 ,itisseenbyredeningthemorphingrate,_,astheproductoftwopartialderivatives,thatEquation 5{2 canberedenedintermsof_x,asshowninEquation 5{34 _x=A0x+A1x+A2x@ @x@x @t=A0x+A1x+A2x@ @x_x(5{34) ItshouldbenotedthatsinceisscalarandEquation 5{34 representsaSISOsystem,thenEquation 5{34 maybewrittenassowithoutalgebraicissues. Afterrearrangingterms,Equation 5{34 canberewrittenintheformshowninEquation 5{35 _x=(I)]TJ /F5 11.955 Tf 15.86 0 Td[(A2x@ @x))]TJ /F7 7.97 Tf 6.59 0 Td[(1(A0x+A1x)=A)]TJ /F7 7.97 Tf 6.59 0 Td[(1~A(5{35) NoticingtherightsideofEquation 5{35 ,itisrecalledthat~Ahasalreadybeenshowntoachievegloballyasymptoticstabilityusingsuboptimalcontrollers.Therefore,Awouldneedtobegloballyasymptoticallystablefortheenitiresystemtoachievegloballyasymptoticstabilityoratleastgloballystableforthesystemtobestable. AnotherwaytolookattheproblemistoseethatEquation 5{35 mayberearrangedsuchthatittakestheformshowninEquation 5{36 _x=(I)]TJ /F5 11.955 Tf 15.85 0 Td[(A2x@ @x))]TJ /F7 7.97 Tf 6.59 0 Td[(1(A0+A1)x=A)]TJ /F7 7.97 Tf 6.59 0 Td[(1^Ax(5{36) Now,thequadraticLyapunovfunction,asshowninEquation 5{30 ,canbeusedtochecktheoverallstabilityofthenewlydenedtime-varyingsystem,asdescribedbyEquation 5{36 .SubstitutionofEquation 5{36 intothepartialderivativeofEquation 5{30 resultsinthestabilitymetricshowninEquation 5{37 @ @x=xT(I)]TJ /F5 11.955 Tf 15.86 0 Td[(A2x@ @x))]TJ /F7 7.97 Tf 6.58 0 Td[(1(A0+A1)x=xTAx(5{37) 118

PAGE 119

ItiscleartoseefromEquation 5{37 thatinorderforthetime-varyingsystem(withinertia)toachievestability,thenAwouldneedtobenegativedenite. 119

PAGE 120

CHAPTER6EXAMPLEOFVARIABLESWEEPAIRCRAFT 6.1Design 6.1.1BiologicalInspiration Theseagullisalogicalchoicefromwhichtoderivebiologicalinspirationsinceitissoadeptatagileyinginwindyconditions.Suchbirdsareroutinelyseentrackingboats,divingtocatchprey,andlandingonbuoysdespiteheavywindsandstronggustsfromdierentdirections.Themissionsenvisionedforaminiatureairvehiclerequireasimilarsetofabilities;therefore,abiomimeticapproachiswarranted. Theskeletalstructureoftheseagullisacriticalcomponentthatenablesightcapability.Inparticular,thejointsattheshoulderandelbowareusedtorotatethewingsandconsequentlyaltertheightdynamics.Suchrotation,asseeninFig. 6-1 ,causesdisplacementinbothverticalandhorizontaldirectionswhichcorrelatestowingdihedralandwingsweep. Figure6-1. PicturesofSeagulls Thewings,asshowninFig. 6-1 ,willusuallyvarythesweepbetweentheinboardandoutboard.Thevariationresultsfromtheindependentactuationabouttheshoulderandelbowtovarythehorizontalrotation.Thismorphingprovidesavarietyofchangesintheightcharacteristicssuchasstability,divespeed,andturnradius. Also,thewingsareshowninFig. 6-1 tovarythesweepbetweenrightandleftwingsalongwiththeinboardandoutboard.Thisvariationutilizes4degreesoffreedomresulting 120

PAGE 121

fromindependentactuationofshoulderandelbowoneachwing.Thismorphingenablesseveralmaneuversrelatedtohoming,rolling,andrejectingcrosswinds. Emphasisisplacedontherelationshipbetweenwingsweepandmaneuvers.Thesweepisalreadyadesignparameterwhoseeectsonaerodynamicshavebeenstudiedfortraditionalaircraft;however,thestudyofbirdsprovidesadditionalinsightintotheperformancethatmaybeachievableusingindependentmulti-jointsweep.Inthiscase,thecorrelationsbetweensweepanddiveareaugmentedwithcorrelationsbetweensweepandagilityforbothturningandtrimming. 6.1.2MechanicalDesign Avehiclewhichfeaturestheindependentmulti-jointcapabilityisdesignedbyretrottinganexistingaircraft[ 3 ].Thebasicconstructionusesskeletalmembersofaprepregnated,bi-directionalcarbonberweavealongwithrip-stopnylon.Thefuselageandwingsareentirelyconstructedoftheweavewhilethetailfeaturescarbonsparscoveredwithnylon.Theresultingstructureisdurablebutlightweight. Thewingsactuallyconsistofseparatesectionswhichareconnectedtothefuselageandeachotherthroughasystemofsparsandjoints.Thesejoints,asshowninFig. 6-2 ,arerepresentativeofashoulderandelbowwhichservetovarythesweepofinboardandoutboard.Therangeofhorizontalmotionadmittedbythesejointsisapproximately30deg. Figure6-2. JointsonWing 121

PAGE 122

Itisnotedthatconventionalaileroncontrolsurfacesareomittedfromtheaircraft'snaldesign.Thisfeatureisadirectresultofspan-wiseinconsistenciescreatedbythedynamicrangeofmorphingcongurations.Therefore,theelbowjointsaredesignedinsuchamannerthattheyallowbothhorizontalsweepandrollingtwist.Thismotionisaccomplishedbycreatingaoatingjointthatcloselymimicsthevariousrangesofmotionattainablebyanautomobile'suniversaljoint,asshownifFig. 6-3 Figure6-3. FloatingElbowJoint Thewingsurfacemustbekeptcontinuousforanycongurationofsweepingbecauseofaerodynamicconcerns.Thisvehicleensuressuchcontinuitybylayeringfeather-likestructures,asshowninFig. 6-4 ,withinthejoint. Figure6-4. Feather-LikeElements Thesestructuresretractontoeachotherunderthewingwhenboththeinboardandoutboardaresweptback.Conversely,theycreateafan-likecoveracrosstheensuinggap 122

PAGE 123

whentheinboardissweptbackandtheoutboardissweptforward.Thecontractionandexpansionofthesurfaceareacreatedbythesestructuresissmoothlymaintainedbyatractandrunnersystemimplementedontheouterregionsofeachmember,asseeninFigure 6-5 Figure6-5. Trackandrunnersystem Spars,formedfromhollowshaftsofcarbonber,areplacedalongtheleadingedgeofeachwing.Thesesparsactasbotharigidsourcetomaintaintheleading-edgecurvatureandaconnectionofeachindependentwingjoint.Theinboardsparistranslatedhorizontallybyaservo-drivenlinearactuatorlocatedinsidethefuselage.Theinboardsparisthenconnectedtotheinboardwingsectionattheshoulderjointlocatedontheoutsideofthefuselage.Theinboardsparthenconnectsattheelbowjointtooutboardsparatroughlythequarter-spanpoint.Theoutboardwingregionisactivatedindependentlyoftheinboardregionbymeansofaservoattachedattheelbow.Anillustrationofthesparconguration,withcorrespondingattachmentpoints,canbeseeninFig 6-6 6.1.3TechnicalSpecications Thevehicleisxed-wingdesignthatincludesafuselageandempennageforatotalweightof596g.Thefuselagehasatotallengthof48cmandiscomposedofacylindicalbaywithlargestdiameterof7cmthatstretchesfor30cmandaboomwithdiamterof1cmthatstretchesfor18cm.Thewingsaremountedonthetopofthecylindrical 123

PAGE 124

Figure6-6. Underwingsparstructure baywhiletheavionicsaremountedinsidethecylindricalbay.Thecomponentsoftheempennage,includingtheelevatorandrudderwhichactascontrolsurfaces,aredescribedinTable 6-1 Table6-1. Empennagespecications SectionReferenceReferenceReferenceSpan(cm)Chord(cm)Area(cm2) HorizontalTail30.487.62232.26VerticalTail15.247.62116.13Rudder30.484.57139.29Elevator15.243.0446.33 Referenceparametersforthemorphingwingvarybasedonsweepconguration.ArepresentativesetoftheseparametersaregiveninTable 6-2 foralimitedsetofsymmetriccongurationsinwhichtheleftandrightwingshaveidenticalsweep. Theavionicsconsistsofactuatorsandamotor.AsetofeightHitechHS-65MGmetalgearservosprovideactuationandaredistributedasthreeservostocontroltheinboardsweep,outboardsweepandwingtwistofeachwingalongwithtwoservostocontrolthe 124

PAGE 125

Table6-2. Referenceparametersforsymmetricsweep InboardOutboardReferenceReferenceReference(deg)(deg)Span(cm)Chord(cm)Area(cm2) -15-3066.1714.681028.11-10-2073.9713.121003.45-5-1078.8112.38976.250080.3911.84947.1151078.6111.62916.68102073.6111.69885.66153065.7212.13854.76 elevatorandrudder.ThemotorisanE-ightsix-seriesbrushlesselectricmotorpoweredbyathree-cellThunderPowerLi-polymer2100mAhbattery. 6.2Modeling 6.2.1ComputationalTools Aerodynamicsolutionsforthree-dimensionalwingsofanyshapeorsizecanbecalculatedbyusingavortex-latticemodel.Assumingtheowtobeincompressibleandinviscid,thewingismodeledasasetofliftingpanelswitheachcontainingasinglehorse-shoevortex.Bothspan-wiseandchord-wisevariationinliftcanbemodeledasasetofstepchangesfromonepaneltothenext,asshowninFig 6-7 Figure6-7. Modelingoftheliftvectors Locatedatthepanelquarter-chordpositionisaboundvortex,whichshedstwotrailingvortexlines.Therequiredstrengthoftheboundvortexoneachpanelwillneedtobecalculatedbyapplyingasurface-owboundarycondition.Thisboundaryconditionstatesthereiszeroownormaltothesurfaceofthewing.Foreachpanelthiscondition 125

PAGE 126

isappliedatthethree-quarter-chordpositionalongthecenterlineofthepanel.Thenormalvelocityismadeupofafreestreamcomponentandaninducedowcomponent.Thisinducedcomponentisafunctionofstrengthsofallvortexpanelsonthewing.Thus,foreachpanelanequationcanbesetupwhichisalinearcombinationoftheeectivestrengthsproducedfromallpanel.Bysolvingtheseequations,onecanproduceamodelthateectivelydescribestheaerodynamicqualitiesandcontrollabilityofanaircraft. AVL[ 30 ]isavortex-latticemodelthatisbestsuitedforaerodynamiccongurationswhichconsistmainlyofthinliftingsurfacesatsmallanglesofattackandsideslip.Thesesurfacesandtheirtrailingwakesarerepresentedassingle-layervortexsheets,discreditedintohorseshoevortexlaments,whosetrailinglegsareassumedtobeparalleltothelongitudinalx-axis,asshowninFig 6-8 Figure6-8. Modelingofthetrailinglegvectors AVLprovidesthecapabilitytoalsomodelslenderbodiessuchasfuselagesandnacellesviasource-doubletlaments.Theresultingforceandmomentpredictionsareconsistentwithslender-bodytheory,buttheaerodynamicsaregenerallychallengingtocompute,thereforethemodelingofbodiesshouldbedonewithcaution.Ifafuselageisexpectedtohavelittleinuenceontheaerodynamicloads,itshouldbeleftoutoftheAVLmodelentirely.Thisexclusionofthebodyisprescribedtoavoidpotentialinaccuraciesfromenteringtheoverallmodel. 126

PAGE 127

AVLassumesquasi-steadyow,whichallowsunsteadyvorticitysheddingtobeneglected.Moreprecisely,itassumesthelimitofsmallreducedfrequency,whichmeansthatanyoscillatorymotion(e.g.inpitch)mustbeslowenoughsothattheperiodofoscillationismuchlongerthanthetimeittakestheowtotraverseanairfoilchord.Thisassumptionisvalidforvirtuallyanyexpectedightmaneuver.Also,theroll,pitch,andyawratesusedinthecomputationsmustbeslowenoughsothattheresultingrelativeowanglesaresmall,asjudgedbythedimensionlessrotationrateparameters. 6.2.2SweepDetermination Thisvehicleisabletoachieveawiderangeofsweeporientationsinbothsymmetricandasymmetriccongurations.SomerepresentativecongurationsareshowninFig. 6-9 todemonstratetherange. Figure6-9. SweepCongurations Acoordinatesystemisdenedtofacilitatetheproperdescriptionofeachconguration.Sweepanglesassociatedwiththeinboardsectionsaredenotedas1fortherightwingand3fortheleftwing,whileoutboardsectionsuse2fortherightwingand4fortheleftwing.Theseangles,asshowninFig. 6-10 ,aredenedsuchthatpositivevaluesindicateabackwardsweep.Also,eachangleisdescribedrelativetotheright-sidereferencelinethatisperpendiculartothefuselagereference. 127

PAGE 128

6nose -rightside 1 2 3 4 Figure6-10. SweepAngles 6.3AerodynamicProperties 6.3.1SymmetricCongurations:Aerodynamics Theaerodynamicsareevaluatedforthesymmetriccongurationsinwhichthesweepoftherightwingisequivalenttothesweepoftheleftwing.Inthiscase,theonlydegreesoffreedomaretheinboardandoutboardangleswhicharesharedbyeachwing.Theaerodynamicsarecomputedusingavortex-latticemethodthatisdesignedtoconsiderthinairfoils[ 30 ].Asetofrepresentativedataispresentedthatisparticularlyinformativewithrespecttothemaneuversanticipatedforthisclassofvehicle. ThevariationofliftwithrespecttoangleofattackisshowninFig. 6-11 forarangeofsweepcongurations.ThedatashowthattheaircraftobtainsitshighestCLalongaridgelinecorrelatingtoequalbutoppositesweepofinboardandoutboard.Conversely,thisderivativedecreasessignicantlyforcongurationsofinboardandoutboardbeingbothsweptbackorbothsweptforward.Assuch,theliftismoredependentonangleofattackbyutilizingtheadditionaldegreeprovidedbytheelbowtoopposethesweepoftheshoulder. Anotherlongitudinalparameter,Cm,isshowninFig. 6-12 forthesweepcongurations.Thisparameterisdirectlyindicativeofthestaticstability;consequently,thepositivevaluesindicatetheaircraftbecomesmorestaticallyunstableasthewingsaregraduallysweptforward.Thisinstabilityisdemonstrativeofacenterofgravitywhichliesaftofthe 128

PAGE 129

Figure6-11. VariationofLiftwithAngleofAttackforSymmetricSweep neutralpoint.Thecenterofgravityisrelativetotheplacementofmasseswithin,oron,theaircraft,andthereforeshiftsaccordingtoeachmorphingconguration. Figure6-12. VariationofPitchMomentwithAngleofAttackforSymmetricSweep Thedamping-in-rollderivative,towhichClpiscommonlyreferred,isshowninFig. 6-13 forthecongurationspace.Arollratecausesvariationsinangleofattackalongthespanofthewingwhichcreatesarollingmoment.Thisderivativeisnegativeforallsweepcongurations,withthelargestvaluedmagnitudesoccurringinregionscorrespondingtocongurationswithequalbutoppositesweepoftheinboardandoutboardsections.Themagnitudedecreasesforcongurationswithinboardandoutboardbeingbothforwardsweptorbothbackwardsweptwhichsuggestsapotentialitytoauto-rotateorspin. ThevehiclehasdirectionalstaticstabilityasevidencedbythedatainFig. 6-14 forallsymmetriccongurations.Thisdatarelatesthederivativeofyawmomentwithangle 129

PAGE 130

Figure6-13. VariationofRollMomentwithRollRateforSymmetricSweep ofsideslipwhosepositivitydemonstratesthestabilitycondition.Thestabilityisincreasedasthebackwardsweepincreasesbecausethestabilizingcontributionsofthefuselageandverticaltaildominateasthewingloseseectiveness. Figure6-14. VariationofYawMomentwithAngleofSideslipforSymmetricSweep 6.3.2SymmetricCongurations:FlightDynamics Linearizedmodelsoftheightdynamicsarecomputedbyrelatingtheaerodynamiccoecientstothestandardequationsofmotionforight[ 33 ],asgiveninFig. 6-15 .Theselinearizedmodelshavedecoupledstatesthatallowseparateanalysisoflongitudinaldynamicsandlateral-directionaldynamics.Modelsarecomputedforeverysymmetriccongurationintherangeofsweepanglestoindicatethevariedstabilityproperties. Thelongitudinaldynamicsarestable,asshowninFig. 6-16 ,forthemajorityofobtainablecongurations.Largevaluesofforwardsweepfortheinboardrequirealargevalueofbackwardsweepfortheoutboardtomaintainstability.Thesweepof 130

PAGE 131

Figure6-15. Modeltostate-spaceowchart theoutboardsectionisallowedtodecreaseastheinboarddecreasesitsforwardsweep.Eventually,thevehiclecanremainstabledespiteasmallvalueofforwardsweepfortheoutboardaslongastheinboardhasalargevalueofbackwardsweep. Figure6-16. NumberofUnstablePolesofLongitudinalDynamicsforSymmetricSweep Stabilityofthelateral-directionaldynamics,asshowninFig. 6-17 ,isachievedforasmallsetofcongurations.Theonlyregionofstabilitycorrespondstocongurationswithlargevaluesofbackwardsweepofbothinboardandoutboard.Theoneunstablepole,showninFig. 6-17 ,correspondstoaclassicallydenedspiralmodethatiscommonlyfoundtobeunstablewithalargetimeconstant. SomemodalpropertiesofthelongitudinaldynamicsarepresentedinFig. 6-18 toindicatethenumberofcomplexpoles.Eachpairofpolesrelatestoanoscillatorymodeso 131

PAGE 132

Figure6-17. NumberofUnstablePolesofLateral-DirectionalDynamicsforSymmetricSweep responsecharacteristicscanbedirectlyinferred.Inthiscase,thevehicledemonstratesaclassicalsetofphugoidandshort-periodmodesforthemajorityofcongurationsincludingallthosewithbackwardsweepoftheoutboardsections.Thephugoidmodeislostastheoutboardsectionsincreaseinforwardsweepuntileventuallyeventheshort-periodmodeislostforlargevaluesofforwardsweepfortheoutboard.Itcanbesaidthattheintroductionofunstablepoles,asshowninFig. 6-16 ,isdirectlyrelatedtothelossofbothoscillatorymodes,asshowninFig. 6-18 ,orviceversa. Figure6-18. NumberofOscillatoryPolesforLongitudinalDynamicswithSymmetricSweep ThenumberofoscillatorypolesisshowninFig. 6-19 forthelateral-directionaldynamics.Itisseenthatvehicleretainstwo-oscillatorypolesregardlessofthesweepconguration.Therefore,itcanbeinferredthatthevehiclehasaclassicdutchrollmode 132

PAGE 133

forallcongurations.Itcanbesaidthattheintroductionofunstablepoles,asshowninFig. 6-17 ,isnotcausedbyachangeinmodenature. Figure6-19. NumberofOscillatoryPolesforLateral-DirectionalDynamicswithSymmetricSweep 6.3.3AsymmetricCongurations Theaerodynamicsarealsocomputedforasetofasymmetriccongurationsinwhichtherightwingandleftwinghavedierentsweep.Theindependenceofinboardandoutboardoneachwingpresentsasetofcongurationswith4degreesoffreedom;consequently,thedatamustberestrictedtofacilitatepresentation.Theaerodynamicsarepresentedhereforcongurationsinwhichtherightwingisxedwith1=2=0andtheleftwingismorphedfrom-30degto30deginboththeinboardandoutboard. Asetofstandardparameterscanbecomputedtodirectlycomparetheaerodynamicsofsymmetricandasymmetriccongurations.Thevariationwithangleofattackforlift,showninFig. 6-20 ,andmoment,showninFig. 6-21 ,canbecomparedwithFig. 6-11 andFig. 6-12 ,respectively.Theclearsimilaritybetweenthesymmetricandasymmetricvaluesindicatessomerelationshipbetweenthecongurationscanbeinferred.Inparticular,thevariationcausedbysweepingbackasinglewingaresimilarinnaturetothevariationcausedbysweepingbackbothwings.Themagnitudeissmallerwhensweepingbackthesinglewingsosomelossofeciencyissuggested;however,thestabilityderivativesdisplaythesameshapeforeachsituation. 133

PAGE 134

Figure6-20. VariationofLiftwithAngleofAttackforAsymmetricSweep Figure6-21. VariationofPitchMomentwithAngleofAttackforAsymmetricSweep ThevariationofrollmomentwithrollratecanbecomparedinFig. 6-22 withFig. 6-13 alongwithvariationofyawmomentwithangleofsideslipshowninFig. 6-23 andFig. 6-14 forasymmetricandsymmetriccongurations.Again,thevariationsaresimilarinnatureforeachsetofcongurationssuggestingasimilarityinowphysicsbutalossofeciencyintheeect. Figure6-22. VariationofRollMomentwithRollRateforAsymmetricSweep 134

PAGE 135

Figure6-23. VariationofYawMomentwithAngleofSideslipforAsymmetricSweep Anadditionalsetofaerodynamicparametersarecomputedfortheasymmetriccongurationsthatarenullforthesymmetriccongurations.Theseparameters,whichareshowninFig. 6-24 ,representthecouplingbetweenlongitudinaldynamicsandlateral-directionaldynamics.Thedatashowsthatsweepingtheleftwingcausesadramaticincreaseinmagnitudeoftheseparameters.Sucharesultisexpectedsincetheseparametersreecttheasymmetrythatincreaseswithsweep. Figure6-24. VariationofCoupledAerodynamicsforAsymmetricSweep 6.3.3.1Flightdynamics Asetofmodelsthatrepresenttheightdynamicsarealsocomputedfortheasymmetriccongurations.Theselinearizedmodelsdonothavelongitudinalparametersdecoupledfromlateral-directionalparameters;consequently,theanalysismustconsiderasinglecoupledsystem. Thedynamicsareunstable,asshowninFig. 6-25 ,foranycongurationofasymmetricsweep.Thesystemisshowntohaveoneunstablepoleforthemajorityofcongurations 135

PAGE 136

andthreeunstablepolesforasmallregion.Thesmallregionisindicatedbyalargeforwardsweepoftheinboardsectionandaequaldisplacementofsweeparoundtheoutboardneutralposition. Figure6-25. NumberofUnstablePolesforDynamicswithAsymmetricSweep ThenumberofoscillatorymodesispresentedinFig. 6-26 todemonstratesomepropertiesofthevehiclemotion.Inthiscase,thevehiclehastheclassical3oscillatorymodesformostcongurationswhentheoutboardhasneutralorbackwardsweep.Astheoutboardissweptforwardoftheneutralposition,aregionofmodeswappingiscreated.Thisregionofforwardsweepfortheoutboardsectionindicatesthatamodeisgainedorlossstrictlydependingonthesweepoftheinboardsection. Figure6-26. NumberofOscillatoryPolesforDynamicswithAsymmetricSweep 6.3.3.2Modecharacterization Themodesofarepresentativecongurationischaracterizedtodemonstratethecoupledmotionwhichresultsfromanasymmmetricsweepofthewings.Theconguration 136

PAGE 137

ischosentohaveastraightwingontherightwithnosweepso1=2=0andastraightwingontheleftwithbackwardssweepso3=4=15deg.Theeigenvaluesgeneratedfromthisconguration,asshowninTable 6-3 ,indicatesevenstablepolesandoneunstablepolewhichisadistributionexpectedfromFig. 6-25 Table6-3. Setofeigenvalues Eigenvalues -17.59426.401i-37.202-2.78413.394i-0.1920.685i0.0610 FromTable 6-3 ,itcanbeseenthatthedynamicshavetwonon-oscillatorymodes.Thetimeconstantsofthesemodes,asshowninTable 6-4 ,indicatestheonemodehasastableconvergenceandtheotherhasanunstabledivergence.Thestableconvergenceisatleasttwoordersofmagnitudefasterthantheunstabledivergence. Table6-4. Timeconstantsofnon-oscillatorymodes ModeEigenvalueTimeConstant 1-37.200.026920.061-16.393 Theightmotionassociatedwitheachofthesemodesisdeterminedbythemodeshapes.SuchshapesaregiveninTable 6-5 todescribetherelativevalueofeachstateduringtheresponse.Theconvergenttermischaracterizedbymostlyrollratewithminorcontributionsfromangleofattack,rollangleandpitchrate.Thismodeissimilarinnaturetotheclassicallydenedrollmode.Thedivergenttermischaracterizedbyfullycoupledmotioninwhichtherollangleisvaryingalongwithprimarilytheyawrate,butalsotheforwardvelocity.Thismodeissimilarinnaturetotheclassicallydenedunstablespiralmode. 137

PAGE 138

Table6-5. Modeshapesofnon-oscillatorymodes statemode1mode2 forwardvelocity-0.0007-0.1324angleofattack-0.03980.0163pitchrate-0.05380.0003pitchangle-0.00140.0053angleofsideslip-0.00030.0100rollrate0.99710.0557yawrate-0.02310.3811rollangle-0.02680.9131 Table 6-3 alsoindicatesthattheightdynamicshavethreeoscillatorymodes.ThevaluesofnaturalfrequencyanddampingaregiveninTable 6-6 foreachmode.Themodewiththelowestnaturalfrequencyisunstablewhiletheothermodesarestable. Table6-6. Modalpropertiesofoscillatorymodes ModeEigenvalueFrequency(rad/s)Damping 3-17.59426.401i31.730.5464-2.78413.394i13.680.2035-0.1920.685i0.710.270 Theeigenvectorsassociatedwiththesemodesarealsocomplexsothemagnitudeandphaseofeachmodeshapeisusedtoanalyzetherelationshipbetweenstates.Theresultingdata,giveninTable 6-7 ,showsthatmodes3and5areprimarilydominatedbylongitudinalmotionwithonlyasmallcouplingtothelateral-directionalmotion,whilemode4isthedirectopposite.Suchmotionisnotentirelyunexpectedsinceeventhesymmetriccongurationshadoscillatorymodesaectingboththelongitudinalandlateral-directionaldynamics.Assuch,mode3haspropertieswithsomesimilaritytoashort-periodmode,whilemode4haspropertiessimilartoadutch-rollmodeandmode5similartoaphugoidmode. 6.3.3.3Crosswindrejection Sensorpointinginurbanenvironmentsisaprimemissionforwhichmicroairvehiclesarebeingdeveloped.Crosswinds,bothsteady-statewindandtime-varyinggusts,presentasignicantchallengetomaintainingsensorpointingduringight.Thecommonapproach 138

PAGE 139

Table6-7. Modeshapesofoscillatorymodes Mode3Mode4Mode5statemagnitudephase(deg)magnitudephase(deg)magnitudephase(deg) forwardvelocity0.02-42.60.0195.30.990.0angleofattack0.49-102.60.0536.10.08-179.1pitchrate0.620.00.0787.70.050.2pitchangle0.02-123.70.005-14.00.07-105.5angleofsideslip0.0002-61.20.0781.30.0002-20.3rollrate0.61-28.50.24-66.50.0051.5yawrate0.02-129.10.970.00.003-82.8rollangle0.02-152.20.02-168.30.007-104.2 tosensorpointingdespitecrosswindsisturningintothewindandcrabbingdownrangetoperiodicallypointthesensor;however,suchanapproachiscertainlynotoptimalduetothelackofcontinuouscoveragebythesensoralongthedesiredlineofsight. Asymmetricwing-sweepcanenhancetheabilitytoperformsensorpointinginthepresenceofsuchcrosswinds.Inparticular,onewingcanbesweptdownwindwhileonewingissweptupwind.Theaircrafthas,inasense,rotatedthewingsintothewindwhilethefuselageremainspointedinitsoriginaldirection.Thischangeintheeectivesideslipanglecaneasilybeillustrated,asseeninFig. 6-27 Figure6-27. EectiveAnglesofSideslip Theangleofsideslipatwhichtheaircraftcantrimisanindicatoroftheamountofcrosswindinwhichtheaircraftcanmaintainsensorpointing.Arepresentativedemonstration,showninFig. 6-28 ,presentsthemaximumpositivevaluesforangleof 139

PAGE 140

sideslipatwhichtheaircraftcantrim.Thewingsareconstrainedinthisdemonstrationsuchthatinboardandoutboardanglesareidenticalwhichlimitsthedegreesoffreedomandfacilitatespresentation.Also,eachconditioncorrespondstothelargestangleofsideslipatwhichtheaircraftcantrimgivendeectionlimitsof15degfortherudderandelevatoralongwithaileron. Figure6-28. MaximumAngleofSideslipatwhichAircraftcanTrim ThedatainFig. 6-28 demonstratesthatwingsweepisbenecialforsensorpointing.Specically,aforward)]TJ /F1 11.955 Tf 9.3 0 Td[(30degsweepoftheleftwingandabackward30degsweepoftherightwingallowsanangleofsideslipof44degtobemaintained.Thismaximumangledecreasesastheleftwingdecreasesitsforwardsweepandtherightwingdecreasesitsbackwardsweep.Thevehicleiseventuallyunabletotrimatanypositiveangleofsideslipwhenthebothwingsaresweptbackward. 6.4DynamicProperties 6.4.1MissionScenario Thevariablewing-sweepvehicleisdesignedforsurveillanceinurbanoperations.Inparticular,itisdesignedtoallowightinconstrainedareaswithlimitedairspace.Arepresentativemissionisplacingasensorintoawindowonabuildingwhichisclosetootherbuildings. 140

PAGE 141

6.4.1.1Divemaneuver Themissionproleforsuchamissioninvolvesseveralsegments.Theinitialightisstandardstraight-and-leveloperationatanaltitudeabovethebuildings.Uponreachingtheopeningbetweenthosebuildings,thevehicleentersasteepdivetorapidlydecreasealtitudewithoutincurringmuchforwardorsidetranslation.Theaircraftceasesthediveandreturnstostraight-and-levelightasquicklyaspossiblewhenthealtitudereachesthedesiredvalueassociatedwiththewindow. Themorphingvariestoincreaseperformanceofthemetricsassociatedwitheachmissionsegment.Theinitialightusesacruisecongurationwiththewingshavingnosweep.Thedivethenutilizesafullyswept-backconguration.Finally,thevehiclereturnstoanominalcongurationforenteringthewindow.Ineachcase,theaircraftusesasymmetricsweepofthewingstoavoidanycouplingassociatedwithasymmetriccongurations[ 46 ]. 6.4.1.2Turnmaneuver Themissionproleforsuchamissionagaininvolvesseveralsegments.Theinitialightisstandardstraight-and-leveloperationatanaltitudewithinthebuildings.Uponreachingadesiredopeningbetweenbuildings,thevehicleentersacoordinatedturntorapidlychangeheadingwithoutincurringmuchchangeinaltitude.Theaircraftceasestheturnandreturnstostraight-and-levelightasquicklyaspossiblewhentheheadingreachesthedesiredvalueassociatedwiththewindow. Themorphingagainvariestoincreaseperformanceofthemetricsassociatedwitheachmissionsegment.Theinitialightusesacruisecongurationwiththewingshavingnosweep.Theturnthenutilizesanequal-but-oppositecongurationarrangement.Anexampleofthisequal-but-oppositemorphingwouldbetheleftwingfullyforwardandtherightwingfullyswept.Finally,thevehiclereturnstoanominalcongurationforenteringthewindow.Itshouldbenotedthattheasymmetricmorphingcausesthedynamicstoexperiencecross-coupling. 141

PAGE 142

6.4.2MassDistribution Anelementalbreakdownoftheaircraft'smassdistributionallowsformoreaccurateinertialmomentsandratestobecomputed.Thesemassesarerepresentedaspointmassesandarelocatedatsomedistancefromtheaircraft'scenterofgravity.Thecenterofgravityisafunctionofwingmorph;therefore,ittranslatesalongthethree-dimensionalbody-axisaccordingly.Themagnitudeofthistranslationalchangeisfoundtobenegligiblethroughoutthedesiredmorphingrange,sinceverylittlemassisactivelymovedwhensweepingthewings,andthereforeassumedstationaryforthismodel. Adirectresultofhavingthisxedcenterofgravityisthattheaircraft'snon-dynamicpointmassesprovideforaconstantinertialmoment,whereonlythedynamicpointmasses,suchastheleftandrightwingsections,createanon-constantmoment.Theoverallmagnitudeofthisnon-constantmomentisdirectlydependentonhowtheaircraftisbeingmorphed.Iftheaircraft'swingsaresymmetricalwithrespecttothecommonlyassignedxz-plane,thenonlythexzinertialproducttermappears,whereas,ifthewingsareasymmetricalwithrespecttothexz-plane,thenallthreeinertialproducttermswillappear. Thewingisdividedintoseparateinboardandoutboardsections,whereacentroidlocationisfoundforeach.Basedonhowthewingismorphed,athreedimensionalaverageistakenbetweentheinboardandoutboardcentroids.Thisaverageistakenwithrespecttothecenterofgravityandisrepresentativeofanoverallcentroidlocationfromwhichthatwing'spointmassislocated. Asimplediagramillustratingtheaircraft'ssectionaldistributionandcenterofgravitylocationisshowninFigure 6-29 .NotethatinFigure 6-29 ,thecoordinatesystemisuniquetothemodelingprogramandisorientedoppositetotheearlierdenedaircraftbody-axis.ThisgureisaccompaniedbyTable 6-8 ,whichliststhemassesforeachsection.ThesemassesarethenusedtocalculatetheindividualinertialmomentslistedinTable 6-9 142

PAGE 143

Figure6-29. PointMassLocations Table6-8. Individualpointmasses MB(g)MF(g)MM(g)MTB(g)MVT(g)MHT(g)MRW(g)MLW(g) 1302955015884545 Table6-9. Characteristicsofelementsgivenascentroidposition(in)andmomentsofinertia(gin2) elementSymbolXYZIxxIyyIzzIxyIxzIyz batteryB-2.50.0-1.753981211812.50.0-5960.0fuselageF0.00.0-1.759039030.00.00.00.0motorM4.50.01.5113112510130.0-3380.0tailboomTB8.50.0-3.0135121910840.03830.0verticaltailVT13.50.00.00.0145814580.00.00.0horizontaltailHT13.50.0-3.072153014580.03240.0 6.4.3ManeuverAssumptions Asetofplantmodelsaregeneratedtorepresenttheightdynamicsateachconguration.Essentially,theforcesandmomentsaectingthevehiclearecomputedusinganassumptionofsteady-stateconditions.Theresultingmodelsdonotproperlyrelatetheunsteadyaerodynamicsbutwillincludethedominantsteady-stateaerodynamics.Thetime-varyinginertiasarethenintroducedtoaccountforthemorphingusingtheexpressionsderivedinSection 2.3.1.2 143

PAGE 144

6.4.4DiveManuever 6.4.4.1Modeling Thevehicleisconstrainedinthismaneuvertosimplifythecongurationspace.Thephysicalvehiclehas4degrees-of-freedominthateachinboardandoutboardcansweepindependentlyontheleftandrightsides;however,thissimulationconstrainstheleftandrightwingstosymmetricsweepwiththeoutboardhavingtwiceasmuchsweepastheinboard.Thisconstraintlimitsthesystemtoasingledegree-of-freedomwhichisappropriateforthelongitudinalnatureofthealtitudechangeassociatedwiththemission. Theightdynamicsforeachcongurationaretrimmedforstraightandlevelight.Actually,thethrustisheldconstantforeachofthesecongurationstonotethepropulsionisnotaectedbythemorphing.Suchanapproachisparticularlyusefulforrelatingmodelsthatmaybetrimmedatvariousairspeeds.Inthiscase,thethrustanddragwereheldconstantsothatthetrimroutinefoundthecorrectairspeed,asshowninFigure 6-30 ,torelateeachmodel. Figure6-30. ChangeinVelocityBasedonSymmetricMorphing:0deg( {2{ ),5deg( {/{ ),10deg( {{ ),15deg( {{ ),20deg( {.{ ),25deg( {{ ),30deg( {4{ ) Figure 6-30 relatestheoveralldragtovelocitywhereeachtrendline(designatedbylinetype),representsamorphingconguration.AconstantthrustoftwoNewtonsischosenand,thusalineisdrawntorepresentthisvalue.Itisshownthatasthewingsaremorphedfurtherback,theintersectionatwhichthetrendlinescrosstheconstant 144

PAGE 145

thrustlinesteadilyincreases.ThispointofintersectionrepresentsthevelocitynecessarytomaintaintwoNewtonsofdragatthatconguration.Overall,Figure 6-30 suggeststhatbysweepingthewingsback,highervelocitiescanbeattained,whilemaintainingaconstantdrag(equaltothrustintrimmedcases).Thistrendisasensibleresultduetothefactthatlesssurfaceareaisexposedtotheoncomingairowwhilethewingsaremorphedbackward. Thevelocitiesfoundateachintersectionarethenusedascorrespondingtrimvelocitieswhenperformingthedivemaneuver. 6.4.4.2Altitudecontroller Acontrollerisformulatedforthisaircrafttoenableamaneuverenvisionedinitsmissionprole;namely,acompensatorwillcommandthevehicletotrackadesiredaltitudeprole.Amulti-looparchitectureisusedtorepresentthecontrollerwhichwillbederivedinamodularapproach. Apairofcontrollersareactuallycomputedforthisaircraftsuchthatonecontrollerisappropriateforthenominalcongurationwhiletheotherisappropriatefortheswept-backconguration.Essentially,thecontrollersarederivedusinganassumptionofinstantaneousmorphing.Suchanapproachsimplyswitchesbetweenfeedbackgainstomatchtheassumedswitchbetweennominaldynamicsandswept-backdynamics.Obviouslythemorphingisnotinstantaneous;however,thisassumptionisnotoverlyunreasonablegiventhefastrateofmorphingontheaircraft. Aninner-loopcontrollerisderivedtotrackcommandstopitchrate.Thiscompensatoriscomputedusingalinear-quadraticregulator[ 87 ]usingafeedbackelement,K,andafeedforwardelement,k,alongwithanintegrator.Actually,thedesignisbasedonshort-perioddynamicstoavoidthepolesandzeroesassociatedwiththephugoiddynamics.Theguaranteeofnosteady-stateerrorinresponsetoastepcommandisonlyassociatedwiththeshort-periodmodelbutthefull-orderdynamicsusedinthesimulationstillshowanacceptableresponse. 145

PAGE 146

Anouter-loopcontrollerisderivedtoaecterrorinaltitude.Thedierencebetweencommandedaltitudeandmeasuredaltitudeisprocessedthrougharst-orderlter,F,toshapethephaseproperties[ 115 ].Theresultingsignalissomewhatindicativeofapitchcommandsoitsderivativeisusedasapitch-ratecommandfortheinner-loopcontroller. Theresultingclosed-loopsystem,asshowninFigure 6-31 ,incorporatesthevariouselementsusingappropriatefeedbackinthemulti-looparchitecture.Anadditionalfeedforwardelement,Z,isincludedinthedesigntoaectthepitchduringtheresponse. a F s 1 s k P K 6 6 ? Z ?huwq Figure6-31. Closed-LoopBlockDiagram 6.4.4.3Time-varyingdynamics Thesimulationofthemorphingaircraftmustproperlyaccountforthetime-varyingdynamics.Essentially,themorphingiscommandedtochangethroughoutthesimulationsotheightdynamicsmustchangeaccordingly.Theplant,P,inFigure 6-31 ,isthussomewhatcomplicatedinitsimplementation. Adiscretizedtypeofmorphingisutilizedinthesimulationtorepresentthesymmetricwing-sweepvariations.ThephysicalaircraftshowninFigure 6-9 hasasweepthatvariesasacontinuousfunctionoftime;however,adiscretizedversionofthismorphingsimpliesthesimulationwithoutlossofgenerality.Inthiscase,thedynamicsassumea5-degreesweepcanbeaccomplishedinstantaneouslybuteach5-degreeincrementmustbeseparatedbysomeminimumtime. 146

PAGE 147

Astandardstate-spaceformulationisusedtorepresenttheplantasshowninFigure 6-32 .Theplantdynamics,whichvarywithmorphingpositionandrate,aregivenbythequadrupleoffA;B;C;Dg. u U B 1 s -y X A 6 D ? Figure6-32. PlantModelwithTrimLogic TheelementofXisusedtoaccountforthechangeintrimconditionsforeachconguration.Considerthatatanypointintime,t,thetotalstatevalue,x(t),isactuallytheadditionofatrimvalue,xo(t),andperturbation,x(t),suchthatx(t)=xo(t)+x(t).Thistotalstatemustremaincontinuousdespitethemorphingeventhoughthetrimvalue,xo(t),willchange.Sincetheplantmodelusesstateperturbationsasafeedback,thenthelogicofXissuchthatx(t+t)=xo(t)+x(t))]TJ /F5 11.955 Tf 11.2 0 Td[(xo(t+t)forsomeintegrationstep-sizeoft. TheelementofUissimilarinnaturetoX.Inthiscase,theelementisusedtoreectthevariationsinelevatorpositionassociatedwithtrim. 6.4.4.4Simulation Thewingcongurationaltersduringthemissiontoreectthedesiredperformance.Therstcongurationhasnosweeptoreectacruiseprole.Thewingsarethensweptbacktothemaximumvaluewhenthediveisinitiated.Uponreachingthedesiredaltitude,thevalueofthesweepisreducedtoreturntoaproleforenteringthewindow.Theangleofthesweep,asshowninFigure 6-33 ,isvariedforsimulationsbasedonfastmorphingorslowmorphing. 147

PAGE 148

Figure6-33. MorphingCongurationforFastMorphing( | ),SlowMorphing( )-222()-222()]TJ ET 0 G 0 g BT /F1 11.955 Tf 438.74 -186.8 Td[() Thealtitudevariation,showninFigure 6-34 ,isthefundamentalmetricusedtoevaluateperformance.Inthiscase,themorphingvehiclesareabletochangetherequiredaltitudeandreturntostraight-and-levelightwithin2.2s.Thefastandslowmorphingaresimilarfortherstsecondbutthenbegintodivergesomewhat.Thefastmorphinghasreachedafullyswept-backcongurationatthistimesoitsresponseahassomewhatlargerovershootthanthatseenwiththeslowmorphing.Thisobservationisadirectresultofthefastmorphingcaseacquiringahighervelocitysoonerandretainingitforalongerperiodoftime.Twoothercasesareconsiderwheremorphingisnotutilized.Thesecasesincludedivemaneuversperformedwiththenominalstraight-wingandfullysweptcongurations.ItisseeninFig. 6-34 thatthenominalcongurationreachesthethedesiredaltitudetheslowestbuthasthesmallestovershoot,whilethefullysweptcongurationreachesthedesiredaltitudemuchfaster,yethasthelargestovershoot. ThestatesassociatedwithpitchareshowninFigure 6-35 inresponsetothealtitudecommandwhilemorphing.Theslowmorphing,incomparisontothefastmorphing,incursagreaterpitchangleduringtheinitialresponsebutthenincursasmallerpitchangleasthevehiclereachesitsnalaltitude.ThisbehaviorcorrelateswiththealtituderesponseofFigure 6-34 148

PAGE 149

Figure6-34. AltitudeinResponsetoFastMorphing( | ),SlowMorphing( ::: ),FixedSwept( )-222()-222()]TJ ET 0 G 0 g BT /F1 11.955 Tf 139.37 -170.84 Td[(),FixedStraight( )-221(\001 ) Figure6-35. PitchAngle(left)andPitchRate(right)inResponsetoFastMorphing( | ),SlowMorphing( ::: ),FixedSwept( )-222()-222()]TJ ET 0 G 0 g BT /F1 11.955 Tf 279.35 -357.97 Td[(),FixedStraight( )-222(\001 ) Thelateral-directionalstatesarefoundnottovarywithalongitudinaldivemaneuver.Thisresultissomewhatexpected,duetothefactthattheaircraftissymmetricallymorphingandthusthecross-couplinginertiasarecancelledoutduetosymmetry. Finally,theelevatorangleisshowninFigure 6-36 todemonstratetheresponsedoesnotincurexcessiveactuation.Themorphingcertainlyinuencestheelevatorinthatthecontroleectivenessdecreasesasthewingsaresweptback.Assuch,theslowmorphinghastheslowestspeedbutalsousesthesmallestrotationofelevator. 6.4.4.5Missionevaluation Theclosed-loopsystemisnotabletosuccessfullycompletethemissionusingonlythenominalcontrollerdesignedforthenominalwingconguration.Thevehicleisabletodivebetweenthebuildingsandsuccessfullychangealtitudewithininanitetimeasshownin 149

PAGE 150

Figure6-36. AltitudeinResponsetoFastMorphing( | ),SlowMorphing( ::: ),FixedSwept( )-222()-222()]TJ ET 0 G 0 g BT /F1 11.955 Tf 139.37 -165.43 Td[(),FixedStraight( )-221(\001 ) Figure 6-34 ;however,ifconstrainedtoacertainspaceandtime,theresultingightpathsassociatedwithmorphingmissthewindowandintersectthesideofthebuilding,asseeninFigure 6-37 .Thisfailuredirectlyresultsfromtheinabilitytoaccountfortime-varyingeectsinthecontrollerdesign.NotethatinFigure 6-37 thecoordinatesarebasedonanEarth-xedframewithaxesdenedbyX,Y,andH. 6.4.4.6Eectsoftime-varyinginertia Theightcontrollerneedstobealteredtocompensateforthetime-varyingparametersassociatedwithmorphing.Althoughmorphingintroducesinertialratesintothedynamics;theseratesarefoundtohavelittleeectontheoverallplantdynamicsandthereforealtertheightpathslightly,asseeninFig. 6-38 .Itshouldbenotedthattheinertialrates,asshowninEquationrefeq41,arecalculatedfromwingscontaininglessthanfteenpercentoftheaircraft'soverallmass.Whenthemassesofthewingsegmentsareincreased(orthetimetomorphisdecreased,asshownbythefastmorphinginFig. 6-38 ),thenthecontributionsfromtheinertialratesbecomemoreprominentintheoveralldynamics.Theresultingchangeindynamicswouldaltertheightpathfurther,thusillustratingtheimportanceofinertialrates. Dierentapproachesmaybetakentoaltertheightcontroller,buteachhasit'sownchallenges.Acompensatortoregulatethepitchisdicultbecausethegainsmustbeoptimizedtothedynamicsbutthosedynamicsarerapidlychangingduringthemorphing. 150

PAGE 151

Figure6-37. AltitudeinResponsetoFastMorphing( | ),SlowMorphing( ::: ),FixedSwept( )-222()-222()]TJ ET 0 G 0 g BT /F1 11.955 Tf 139.37 -468.51 Td[(),FixedStraight( )-221(\001 ) Alternatively,atrackingcontrollercanbeusedafterthemaneuverwhenthedynamicsareknownandxedbutthevehiclemustre-hometowardstheoriginalwaypointorre-locatethewindowusingvisionfeedbackandthencomputeanewtrajectory. 151

PAGE 152

Figure6-38. AltitudeinResponsetoFastMorphing( | ),SlowMorphing( ::: ),FastMorphingWithoutInertia( )-221(\001 ),SlowMorphingWithoutInertia( )-222()-222()]TJ ET 0 G 0 g BT /F1 11.955 Tf 456.7 -396.51 Td[() 6.4.5CoordinatedTurnManeuver 6.4.5.1Modeling Thevehicleisconstrainedinthismanuevertoagainsimplifythecongurationspace.Thismaneuverconstrainstheleftandrightwingstoequal-but-oppositeasymmetricsweepwiththeoutboardhavingnorelativesweepcomparedtotheinboard.Thisconstraint,likethedivemaneuver,limitsthesystemtoasingledegree-of-freedomwhichisappropriateforthelateral-directionalnatureofthechangeinturnperformanceassociatedwiththemission. 152

PAGE 153

Theightdynamicsforeachcongurationaretrimmedforsteadybankedight,andagainthethrustisheldconstantforeachofthesecongurations.Therefore,thetrimroutinefoundthecorrectairspeed,asshowninFigure 6-39 ,torelateeachmodel. Figure6-39. ChangeinVelocityBasedonAsymmetricMorphing:0deg( {2{ ),5deg( {/{ ),10deg( {{ ),15deg( {{ ),20deg( {.{ ),25deg( {{ ),30deg( {4{ ) Fig. 6-39 relatestheoveralldragtovelocitywhereeachtrendlinerepresentsamorphingconguration.AconstantthrustoftwoNewtonsisagainchosenasthedesiredvalue.Itisshownthatasthewingsareasymmetricallymorphed(equalbutopposite,wheretheangleismeasuredwithrespecttotherightwing),theintersectionatwhichthetrendlinescrosstheconstantthrustlinesteadilyincreases.ThispointofintersectionrepresentsthevelocitynecessarytomaintaintwoNewtonsofdragatthatconguration.Overall,Fig. 6-39 suggeststhatbyasymmetricallysweepingthewingsinanequalbutoppositemanner,slowervelocities(inabankedturn)areattainedwhilemaintainingaconstantdrag(equaltothrustintrimmedcases). Thevelocitiesfoundateachintersectionarethenusedascorrespondingtrimvelocitieswhenperformingthecoordinatedturnmaneuver. 6.4.5.2Turncontroller Thecoordinatedturnmaneuverusesabasicclosed-loopapproachforcontrollingthesystem,althoughanopen-loopdesigncouldbeused.Anopen-loopcontrollerwould 153

PAGE 154

besucientbecauseeachplantmodelispreviouslytrimmedforabankedturn.Themodelingtool,AVL,incorporatesaninternalcommandusedfortrimmingmodelsatauserdenedbankangle.Therefore,ifnopilotcommandsaregivenandallexternaldisturbancesareneglected,theaircraftwillremaintrimmedandcompletethemaneuver. Itisnotedthatthemodelsusedtosimulatethismaneuverareperturbationmodelsandthereforeproducestateperturbations.Asaresult,abasicfeedbackloopisincorporatedtomeasurethedierencebetweenthebankangleperturbationandzero.Azerocommandisgiventorepresentthedesiredperturbationfromtrim.Themeasureddierenceisthenmultipledbyaproportionalgainandfedintotheplantasanaileroncontrolcommand.Thisfeedbackloopisincorporatedtoguaranteecontinuitythroughoutmorphing,asdescribedfurtherinSection 6.4.5.3 .Theresultingclosed-loopsystemcanbeseeninFigure 6-40 u k P ?uwqpr Figure6-40. Open-LoopBlockDiagram 6.4.5.3Time-varyingdynamics Likeinthedivemaneuver,themorphingisagaincommandedtochangethroughoutthesimulationandthereforetheightdynamicschangeaccordingly.Althoughtheplant,P,inFigure 6-40 ,isslightlydierentfromtheplantmodelderivedforthedivemaneuverinFigure 6-31 ,itisstillsomewhatcomplicatedinitsimplementation. 154

PAGE 155

Adiscretizedtypeofmorphingisagainutilizedinthesimulationtorepresenttheasymmetricwing-sweepvariations.Theturnsimulationisidenticaltothedivesimulationinthatthephysicalaircrafthasasweepthatvariesasacontinuousfunctionoftimeandadiscretizedversionofthismorphingisusedinthesimulation. Astandardstate-spaceformulationisusedtorepresenttheplantasshowninFigure 6-41 .Theplantdynamics,whichvarywithmorphingpositionandrate,aregivenbythequadrupleoffA;B;C;Dg. u E A R B 1 s -y X A 6 D ? Figure6-41. PlantModelwithTrimLogic TheelementofXisagainusedtoaccountforthechangeintrimconditionsforeachconguration.Thesameconsideration(asthatforthedivesimulation)ismadetoaccountforthecontinuityofthetotalstatedespitethemorphing,aswellasthefeedbackofperturbations. TheelementsA,EandRaresimilarinnaturetoU,asseeninFigure 6-32 .Inthiscase,theelementsareusedtoreectthevariationsinaileron,elevator,andrudderposition,respectively,associatedwithtrim. 6.4.5.4Simulation Amissionischosenfortheturnmaneuver,similartothedivemaneuver,suchthatitwillagaintryytointoaonemeterwindow.Thewingcongurationaltersduringthemissiontoreectthedesiredperformance.Therstcongurationhasnosweepto 155

PAGE 156

reectacruiseprole.Thewingsarethenasymmetricallyswept(equalbutopposite)toachieveamaximummorphedcongurationconsistingoftheleftwinghavingafullforwardsweepwhiletherightwingisequalbutopposite.Themaximummorphedcongurationismaintaineduntiltheendofthemaneuverwhenthevalueofthesweepisreducedtoreturntoaproleforenteringthewindow.Theangleofthesweep,asshowninFigure 6-42 ,isvariedforeachsimulationbasedonfastmorphingorslowmorphing. Figure6-42. MorphingCongurationforFastMorphing( | ),SlowMorphing( )-222()-222()]TJ ET 0 G 0 g BT /F1 11.955 Tf 438.74 -334.56 Td[() Theturnvariation,showninFigure 6-43 ,isthefundamentalmetricusedtoevaluateperformance.Inthiscase,themorphingvehiclesareabletochangetherequiredturningradiusandreturntostraight-and-levelightata270degreeheadingchange.Thefastandslowmorphingaresimilarduringtherstandlastsectionsofthemaneuverbutvarysomewhatthroughouttheactualturn.Theresponseoffastmorphingmorecloselyresemblesthatofthenon-morpedsweptresponseduetothefactthefastmorphingreachesthefullysweptcongurationatanearliertime.Therefore,thefastmorphingresponsecontainsalargerportionproducedfromthesweptwingcongurationthanthatoftheslowmorphingresponsewhichtakeslongertoachievethesameconguration. ThelateralperturbationstatesareshowninFigure 6-44 astherollangleandrollrate.Itisseenthatthefastermorphinginboththerollangleandrateperturbations 156

PAGE 157

A B C Figure6-43. TurninResponsetoFastMorphing( | ),SlowMorphing( ::: ),FixedSwept( )-222()-222()]TJ ET 0 G 0 g BT /F1 11.955 Tf 139.37 -355.98 Td[(),FixedStraight( )-221(\001 ):A)ThecompleteturnproleB)Theturnproleat270degreesC)Theturnproleat180degrees achievehighermagnitudes.Therollangledisplaysthistrendthroughouttheentiremaneuver,whiletherollrateonlyhaslargermagnitudesatthetransientregions. Figure6-44. RollAngle(left)andRollRate(right)inResponsetoFastMorphing(|),SlowMorphing()-222()-222()]TJ /F1 11.955 Tf 33.21 0 Td[() 157

PAGE 158

ThedirectionalperturbationstatesinFigure 6-45 indicatetheyawrateandsideslipangle.Itisnoticedthatthefastermorphingincurslargerperturbationsinbothdirectionalstatesthroughouttheentiremaneuver. Figure6-45. YawAngle(left)andYawRate(right)inResponsetoFastMorphing(|),SlowMorphing()-222()-222()]TJ /F1 11.955 Tf 33.21 0 Td[() Itisnotedthattheturnmaneuverrequirestheaircrafttomorphasymmetrically,andthereforeresultsincoupleddynamics.ThestateperturbationsassociatedwithpitchareshowninFigure 6-46 inresponsetothesimplecontrolsurfacecommandwhilemorphing.Thefastmorphing,incomparisontotheslowmorphing,incursagreaterpitchrateperturbationatbothtransientregions,yetbehavesverysimilarduringthesteadystateregion.Incontrast,thepitchangleperturbationassociatedwithfastmorphinghasahighermagnitudethroughouttheentiremaneuver. Figure6-46. PitchAngle(left)andPitchRate(right)inResponsetoFastMorphing(|),SlowMorphing()-222()-222()]TJ /F1 11.955 Tf 33.21 0 Td[() 158

PAGE 159

6.4.5.5Missionevaluation Theclosed-loopsystemisnotabletosuccessfullycompletethemission.Thevehicleisabletoturnbetweenthebuildingsandsuccessfullychangeheadingwithinthedesiredtimeandairspace.However,whentheeectsofmorphingareintroduced,theresultingightpathmissesthewindowandintersectsthesideofthebuilding,asseeninFigure 6-47 .Thisfailuredirectlyresultsagainfromtheinabilitytoaccountfortime-varyingeectsinthecontrollerdesign.NotethatinFigure 6-37 ,thecoordinatesarebasedonanEarth-xedframewithaxesdenedbyX,Y,andH. Figure6-47. TurninResponsetoFastMorphing(|),SlowMorphing(:::),FixedSwept()-222()-222()]TJ /F1 11.955 Tf 33.21 0 Td[(),FixedStraight()-221(\001) 159

PAGE 160

TheeectsofmorphingonthetrajectoryoftheightpathcanbetterbeseeninFigs. 6.4.5.4 6.4.5.4 6.4.5.6Eectsoftime-varyinginertia Itwasseeninthepreviousmissionthatinertialrateswereintroducedasaresultofmorphing.Duetothesymmetryoftheaircraftinthatmaneuver,mostinertialmomentsandthereforerates,werecancelledout.Inthecaseoftheturnmaneuver,alltheinertialmomentsandratesarekept.Thepresenceofthesetermshasamorepronouncedeectontheturnradius,asseeninFigure 6-48 ,thanthatseenfordiveinthepreviousmission,asseeninFigure 6-38 Figure6-48. TurninResponsetoFastMorphing(|),SlowMorphing(:::),FastMorphingWithoutInertia()-221(\001),SlowMorphingWithoutInertia()-222()-222()]TJ /F1 11.955 Tf 33.21 0 Td[() 160

PAGE 161

Theightcontrollerforthismissionalsoneedstobealteredtocompensateforthetime-varyingparametersassociatedwithmorphing.Simplyintroducingacompensatortoregulatethelateral-directionalstatesischallengingbecausethegainsmustbeoptimizedtothedynamicsbutthosedynamicsarerapidlychangingduringthemorphing.Itispointedoutthatthedynamicsarenowcoupled(duetoasymmetricmorphing)andthereforethecontrollermustalsocompensateforthelongitudinalstates.Atrackingcontrollermayalsobeusedbutthesamedicultiesarisethatwerepointedoutwiththedivemaneuver. 6.5Time-VaryingModalAnalysis 6.5.1Kamen'sMethod 6.5.1.1Statespacemodel Theintroductionofsymmetricmorphingvariestheaerodynamicsandassociatedvaluesofstabilityderivatives.Thesevariationsresultingfrommorphingthesweepsymmetricallyareprimarilyrestrictedtosomederivativesofverticalforceandallthederivativesofpitchmoment.Assuch,thestandardstate-spacerepresentationofthelinearizeddynamicsismodiedinEquation 6{1 toreectthedependencyofthesederivativesonthemorphinggivenas.Ithasbeenshown[ 20 ]thatastheorderofthedynamicsystemincreases,sodoesthediucltytorepresentthem(usingKamen'smethod).Therefore,themodalanalysisutilizingKamen'smethodwillbelimitedtothefourthordersystemdescribedbyEquation 6{1 .Thestatesofthissystemaregivenasuforforwardvelocity,wforverticalvelocity,qforpitchrate,andforpitchanglewhilethestabilityderivativesincludeXiforderivativeoflongitudinalforcewithrespecttotheistate,Ziforderivativeofverticalforcewithrespecttotheistate,andMiforderivativeofpitchmomentwithrespecttotheistate. 161

PAGE 162

266666664_u_w_q_377777775=266666664XuXwXq)]TJ /F5 11.955 Tf 9.3 0 Td[(gcos0ZuZw()u0)]TJ /F5 11.955 Tf 9.3 0 Td[(gsin0Mu()Mw()Mq()00010377777775266666664uwq377777775(6{1) Theanalysisoftime-varyingdynamicsusingthepolesdenedinEquation 3{14 requiresthestate-spacesysteminEquation 6{1 tobeformulatedasadierentialequation.Inthiscase,theequationinvolvingtheverticalvelocity,w,isconsidered.Theequationsinvolvingtheotherstatescanalsobederived;however,thepolesassociatedwiththeverticalvelocityaresucienttocharacterizetheentiresystemsinceanypolesetofobtainedbyatransformationofthesepoles. Thegeneralformofthefourth-orderexpressionforverticalvelocityisgiveninEquation 6{2 byincludingtime-varyingcoecients,A1;A2;A32R,whicharelengthyandthusdenedintheAppendix. d4w dt4+A3(t)d3w dt3+A2(t)d2w dt2+A1(t)dw dt+A0(t)w=0(6{2) ThecoecientsinEquation 6{2 havesignicantlydierentdependenciesonthemorphinginthateachdependsonthestabilitiesderivativesofZw;Mw;Mq;muwhichvarywithmorphingbutnoteachdependsontheratesofchangesofthesestabilityderivatives.ThevalueofA0dependsonboththerstderivativeandsecondderivativewithrespecttotimeforall4ofthesestabilityderivatives;conversely,A3dependsonlyontherstderivativeandsecondderivativewithrespecttotimeforMqandMu.TheeectofmorphingonA3canevenbefurthermitigatedbynotingthatA3dependsonthemorphingvaluebutnotthemorphingrateif_Mu _Mq=Mu Mq=)]TJ /F11 7.97 Tf 10.5 4.71 Td[(Zu uo.Assuch,thetimevariationsofcertainstabilityderivativesonlyaectcertaincoecientsdependingontherateofchangeofthemorphingtrajectory. 162

PAGE 163

Also,thedynamicshaveapotentialtoexperienceabifurcationthatreducestheorderofthedynamics.ThecoecientsinEquation 6{2 eachcontainafractionwiththesamedenominatorwhichiszeroforcertainvaluesofmorphing.ThelossoforderisequivalentlyviewedbymultiplyingEquation 6{2 bythisdenominatorsothatthedependenceond4w dt4isscaledbyzero. 6.5.1.2Morphingtrajectory TheightdynamicsofthevehicleshowninFigure 6-9 areanalyzedduringsymmetricmorphingfromabackwardsweeptohavingnosweep.Specically,thesweepvariedfrom+30degto0degin1secandthenremainsatasweepangleof0degforeachwing.Thismorphingwouldbevaluablewhentransitioningfromadivetostraight-and-levelightsimilarinamannertobiologicalsystemslikegullsandhawks.Thistransition,especiallywhenoperatingimmersedindenseobstaclessuchasurbanenvironments,maystillrequirerapidmaneuveringforpositioningalongwithgustrejectionsotheightdynamicsduringthemorphinremainofcriticalimportance. TheresponseofthestatesareshowninFigure 6-49 asaresultofthemorphing.Theaircraftisalineartime-varyingsystemsfortheinitial1sec;however,theresponsestillresemblesthetraditionalmodesforalineartime-invariantsystem.Thepitchrateandverticalvelocityshowahigh-frequencyresponsethatisheavilydampedtoresembletheshort-periodmode;conversely,theairspeedandpitchanglearedominatedbyalow-frequencyresponsethatislightlydampedtoresembleaphugoidmode. 6.5.1.3Time-varyingpoles Thetime-varyingpolesassociatedwithFigure 6-49 arecomputedtosatisfyEquation 3{14 andshowninFigure 6-50 alongwiththetime-invariantpolesthatignorethetime-varyingeectsofmorphing.Theseresultindicateseveralcharacteristicsoftime-varyingpoles.Considerthatthetime-invariantpolesassociatedwiththeshort-periodmoderemainsimilarforanyvalueofmorphing;however,thetime-varyingpolesofp41andp42,whichareinitiallyclosestinvaluetotheshort-periodpoles,decaytozeroatarate 163

PAGE 164

Figure6-49. LongitudinalStatesduringMorphingfrom+30degto0degover1sec:ForwardVelocity(upperleft),VerticalVelocity(upperright),PitchRate(lowerleft),PitchAngle(lowerright) similartodecayofthestateresponseduetodamping.Also,notethatthepolesofp43andp44showthelowmagnitudeandslowdecayassociatedwithaphugiodmode;however,thesepolesvaryduringtheinitialresponsewhichisdominatedbytheashort-periodresponse.Assuch,thetime-varyingpolesdierinnaturefromtime-invariantpolesinthattheshort-periodmodeandphugoidaresomewhat,butnotcompletely,distinctandthemagnitudeofthepolesdecaysastheresponsedecays. ThemodesdenedinEquation 3{9 associatedwitheachpoleinFigure 6-50 areshowninFigure 6-51 .Thedecompositionoftheresponseactuallydependsontheeigenvectorsandthesemodes,asopposedtothetime-varyingpoles,sotheymustbeconsideredwhenevaluatingtheightdynamics.Theindistinctseparationbetweentheshort-periodmodeandthephugiodmodethatisevidentinthepolesisalsoevidentinthemodes.Themodesof41and42showtheinitialvariationthatwouldindicateashort-periodresponse;however,thesemodesremainsignicantafterthedecaydueto 164

PAGE 165

Figure6-50. LinearTime-VaryingPoles(|)andLinearTime-InvariantPoles()-222()-222()]TJ /F1 11.955 Tf 33.21 0 Td[()duringMorphingfrom+30degto0degover1sec:RealPart(upperleft)andImaginaryPart(lowerleft)ofp41andp42,RealPart(upperright)andImaginaryPart(lowerright)ofp43andp44 short-perioddampingandthenshowvariationmoreconsistentwiththephugoidmode.Themodesfor43and44showsomeinitialinconsistencyaround1secbutthenarequiteconsistentwiththephugiodmode.Indeed,therealpartsof43and44areremarkablysimilartotheresponseofforwardvelocity,whichispredominatelyduetothephuoidmode,inFigure 6-49 Thenatureofthemodesagreeswiththemathematicalpropertiesthatrelatethemtoboththeresponseandthepoles.TheresponsesofFigure 6-49 areoscillatoryandindeedthepolesofFigure 6-50 arecomplexconjugatessothemodesofFigure 6-51 arealsocomplexconjugates.TherealandimaginarypartsofthemodesarenotedinEquation 4{18 tobe90ooutofphaseandindeedthisphasedierenceisseenforthealltimesofthephugoidresponseof43andtheinitialtimesofshort-periodresponseof41until0:2secwhenthedampinghascausedtheresponsetodecay.Also,thestateresponseshouldbeproportionaltotherealpartofthemodeasnotedinEquation 4{19 whichis 165

PAGE 166

Figure6-51. ModesAssociatedwithTime-VaryingPolesduringMorphingfrom+30degto0degover1sec:RealPart(upperleft)andImaginaryPart(lowerleft)of41and42,RealPart(upperright)andImaginaryPart(lowerright)of43and44 demonstratedbytheverticalvelocityinFigure 6-49 matchingtherealpartof1andtheforwardvelocityinFigure 6-49 matchingtherealpartof3. TheissueofstabilityisdirectlyindicatedbythemodesofFigure 6-51 .Thesemodesdemonstratethatthesystemduringthismorphingtrajectoryhasasymptoticstabilitysincethemagnitudeofeachmodedecaystozeroastimeincreases.ThisresultcorrelateswiththeresponsesshowninFigure 6-49 thatobviouslyreturntoequilibrium.Notethatoneguaranteeforasymptoticstabilityishavingnegativereal-partforthetime-varyingpole.TherealpartofthepolesinFigure 6-50 predominatelyassociatedwiththephugoidmodeareindeedalwaysnegative;however,therealpartofthepolespredominatelyassociatedwiththeshort-periodmodearesometimespositivesothemodemustbecomputedtoascertainstability. Finally,theeigenvectorsassociatedwitheachmodeofFigure 6-51 aregraphedinFigure 6-52 toshowtherelativeresponseofeachvehiclestateasnormalizedbythe 166

PAGE 167

verticalvelocity.Theseeigenvectors,similarlyasthethepolesandmodes,showbothshort-periodcharacteristicsandphugiodcharacteristicsbuteachisclearlydominatedbyonetypeofdynamic.Theeigenvectorofv1initiallyshowsshort-periodmotion,withlittlevariationinforwardvelocityandaphasedierenceof90obetweenpitchrateandverticalvelocity,untilthedampingdecaysthatmotionandthephugoidresponseisevident.Theeigenvectorofv2steadilytransitionstothephugiodresponsewhichisprimarilymotioninforwardvelocityandpitchanglewhichare90ooutofphase.Also,notethattheseeigenvectorsnearlyconvergetosimilarmagnitudesandphasesexceptfora90odierenceinphaseofthepitchanglebetweenv1andv2. Figure6-52. NormalizedEigenvectorsAssociatedwithTime-VaryingModesduringMorphingfrom+30degto0degover1sec:Magnitude(upperleft)andPhase(lowerleft)ofv1andMagnitude(upperright)andPhase(lowerright)ofv2 6.5.1.4Modalinterpretation AmodalinterpretationofthepolesinFigure 6-50 isconductedtorelatethesemathematicalconstructstostandardparametersassociatedwithightdynamics.Theparametersaredirectlycomputedfromthetime-invariantpoleswhiletheircounterparts 167

PAGE 168

fromthetime-varyingpolesresultfrominterpretationsthatrelatecharacteristicsoftheresponses. ThenaturalfrequenciesasshowninFigure 6-53 havesomecommonalitiesbutalsosomecleardierenceswhencomparingthetime-varyingpolesandthetime-invariantpoles.Thevaluesarereasonablyclosefortheentiretrajectorywhenconsideringthepolesassociatedwiththephugoidmode;however,thevaluesareonlycloseforashorttimewhenconsideringtheshort-periodmode.Thedierenceinnaturalfrequenciesfortheshort-periodmoderesultsfromtherelationshipofthetime-varyingpolestothestates.Essentially,theshort-periodpoleisinitiallyrelatingtheoscillatorybehavioroftheresponsebutthesignicantdecreaseinresponsemagnitudeduetodampingisactuallyreectedbythetime-varyingpoledecayingtozero. Figure6-53. NaturalFrequencyAssociatedwithLinearTime-VaryingPoles(|)andLinearTime-InvariantPoles()-222()-222()]TJ /F1 11.955 Tf 33.21 0 Td[()duringMorphingfrom+30degto0degover1sec:Poles1and2(left)andPoles3and4(right) TheenvelopethatboundstheresponsesareshowninFigure 6-54 .Theparametersaresimilarforthephugoidmodebutagain,aswiththenaturalfrequency,theparametersdierforthetime-varyingpolesandthetime-invariantpolesfortheshort-periodmode.Inthiscase,theenvelopeboundstheresponseofthepitchrateandverticalvelocitywhichdominatetheshort-periodresponsebutthen,afterthatmodehasdampedout,theenvelopereecttheboundonthepitchangle. 168

PAGE 169

Figure6-54. EnvelopeAssociatedwithLinearTime-VaryingPoles(|)andLinearTime-InvariantPoles()-222()-222()]TJ /F1 11.955 Tf 33.21 0 Td[()duringMorphingfrom+30degto0degover1sec:Poles1and2(left)andPoles3and4(right) ThedampingratioisshowninFigure 6-55 forthetime-varyingpolesandtime-invariantpoles.Thesevaluesaresmallforbothtypesofpolesandthusarereasonablyclose. Figure6-55. DampingRatioAssociatedwithLinearTime-VaryingPoles(|)andLinearTime-InvariantPoles()-222()-222()]TJ /F1 11.955 Tf 33.21 0 Td[()duringMorphingfrom+30degto0degover1sec:Poles1and2(left)andPoles3and4(right) 6.5.2O'Brien'sMethod 6.5.2.1Statespacemodel AsopposedtoKamen'smethod,itwasshowninSection 3.5 ,thatO'Brien'smethodcaneasilybeimplementedonhigherordersystems.Therefore,individual,eightstate,quasi-staticplantmodelsaretakenatperiodiccongurationsovertheentiremorphing 169

PAGE 170

range.Thesemodelsareshowntobe8x8realstatematrices.Eachperiodiccongurationrepresentesadiscretepointintime.Plantmatricesarethenbrokendownbyelements,whereeachelementisplacedintocorrespondingvectors.Theelementvectorsaretheneachanalyticallyttoauniquepolynomial.Byplacingthesefunctionsbackintotheiroriginalpositionswithintheplantmatrix,anequivalenttime-varyingmatrix(ormodel)canbeformed,asshowninEquation 6{3 A(t)=2666666666666666666664f11(t)f12(t)f13(t)f14(t)f21(t)f22(t)f23(t)f24(t)f31(t)f32(t)f33(t)f34(t)f41(t)f42(t)f43(t)f44(t)00f55(t)f56(t)f57(t)f58(t)f65(t)f66(t)f67(t)f68(t)f75(t)f76(t)f77(t)f78(t)f85(t)f86(t)f87(t)f88(t)3777777777777777777775(6{3) ThefunctionsdenedinEquation 6{3 arefoundtohaveapolynomialstructure,asshowninEquation 6{4 170

PAGE 171

f11(t)=)]TJ /F1 11.955 Tf 9.3 0 Td[(0:09t)]TJ /F1 11.955 Tf 11.96 0 Td[(0:33f55(t)=)]TJ /F1 11.955 Tf 9.3 0 Td[(0:03t2+0:07t)]TJ /F1 11.955 Tf 11.95 0 Td[(0:77f12(t)=0:13t2)]TJ /F1 11.955 Tf 11.96 0 Td[(0:67t)]TJ /F1 11.955 Tf 11.96 0 Td[(0:29f56(t)=)]TJ /F1 11.955 Tf 9.3 0 Td[(0:0013t2)]TJ /F1 11.955 Tf 11.95 0 Td[(0:002t)]TJ /F1 11.955 Tf 11.96 0 Td[(0:0017f13(t)=)]TJ /F1 11.955 Tf 9.29 0 Td[(0:03t2)]TJ /F1 11.955 Tf 11.96 0 Td[(0:08t)]TJ /F1 11.955 Tf 11.96 0 Td[(0:15f57(t)=)]TJ /F1 11.955 Tf 9.3 0 Td[(0:0006t)]TJ /F1 11.955 Tf 11.95 0 Td[(0:99f14(t)=0:03t)]TJ /F1 11.955 Tf 11.96 0 Td[(9:79f58(t)=)]TJ /F1 11.955 Tf 9.3 0 Td[(0:001t+0:41f21(t)=0:16t2)]TJ /F1 11.955 Tf 11.96 0 Td[(0:66t)]TJ /F1 11.955 Tf 11.96 0 Td[(1:49f65(t)=)]TJ /F1 11.955 Tf 9.3 0 Td[(31:3t2+643t)]TJ /F1 11.955 Tf 11.95 0 Td[(1013f22(t)=0:79t2)]TJ /F1 11.955 Tf 11.96 0 Td[(3:45t)]TJ /F1 11.955 Tf 11.96 0 Td[(8:95f66(t)=5:94t2)]TJ /F1 11.955 Tf 11.96 0 Td[(20:73t)]TJ /F1 11.955 Tf 11.95 0 Td[(25:23f23(t)=0:19t2)]TJ /F1 11.955 Tf 11.96 0 Td[(0:23t+22:41f67(t)=0:6t3)]TJ /F1 11.955 Tf 11.96 0 Td[(1:17t2)]TJ /F1 11.955 Tf 11.96 0 Td[(3:92t+14:76f24(t)=)]TJ /F1 11.955 Tf 9.3 0 Td[(0:12t2+0:51t+0:62f68(t)=0f31(t)=)]TJ /F1 11.955 Tf 9.29 0 Td[(0:63t3+5:96t2)]TJ /F1 11.955 Tf 11.95 0 Td[(5:12t)]TJ /F1 11.955 Tf 11.95 0 Td[(9:33)]TJ /F1 11.955 Tf 11.96 0 Td[(0:33f75(t)=)]TJ /F1 11.955 Tf 9.3 0 Td[(2:82t3+25:38t2)]TJ /F1 11.955 Tf 11.96 0 Td[(70:61t+279f32(t)=)]TJ /F1 11.955 Tf 9.3 0 Td[(3:27t3+31:99t2)]TJ /F1 11.955 Tf 11.95 0 Td[(2:76t)]TJ /F1 11.955 Tf 11.95 0 Td[(81:14f76(t)=)]TJ /F1 11.955 Tf 9.3 0 Td[(0:29t2+0:87t+0:05f33(t)=)]TJ /F1 11.955 Tf 9.29 0 Td[(1:06t3+4:47t2)]TJ /F1 11.955 Tf 11.95 0 Td[(3:19t)]TJ /F1 11.955 Tf 11.95 0 Td[(30:32f77(t)=)]TJ /F1 11.955 Tf 9.3 0 Td[(0:22t2+1:03t)]TJ /F1 11.955 Tf 11.95 0 Td[(6:57f34(t)=0f78(t)=0f41(t)=0f85(t)=0f42(t)=0f86(t)=1f43(t)=1f87(t)=0f44(t)=0f88(t)=0(6{4) Altogether,thetwelvestatevectorincludesthethreeorientationangles(,, ),thethreeangularrates(p,q,r),thepositionvector([xyz]),andthevelocityvector([uvw]).Forthepurposesofconvenience,thestatevectorwillbereducedtoeightstatesandaugmentedtoinclude.Thereduced,augmentedstatevectorcanbeshowninequation 6{5 171

PAGE 172

x(t)=2666666666666666666664u(t)w(t)q(t)(t)(t)p(t)r(t)(t)3777777777777777777775(6{5) 6.5.2.2Time-varyingpolesandstabilitymodes Applyingthetime-varyingalgorithmdenedinSection 3.5 tothetime-varyingmodelinequation 6{3 ,ateacht2R+,producesanLTVpoleset,stabilitymodes,andcorrespondingeigenvectors.Duetotheextensiveamountofdataproducedforeachmorphingconguration,aswellasthepotentialenvelopeforwhichtheaircraftcanmorph,onlycertainmorphingtrajectoriesandcongurationsarechosentostudythetime-varyingdynamics.Inadditiontolimitingtheamountofcongurations,onlythelongitudinalsystemdynamicsareconsidered.Thecongurationsarechosensuchthattheyincludedsymmetricsweepfromstraight(0degrees)tosweptpositionsof10,20,and30degrees.Eachofthesemorphingtrajectoriesareperformedatratesof2,5,10,and20seconds.Increasingtherateofmorphingalsoincreasestheoveralleectthetime-varyinginertiacontributesintothesystem'sdynamics. Thesetime-varyingeectsareevident,asshowninFigures 6-56 6-59 .Clearly,thestabilitymodesinFigures 6-56 6-57 showtwomodeswhichconvergeuponzeroquickly(modesAandB),whiletwomodesconvergeuponzeroaftersomelengthyperiodoftime(modesCandD).ObservationsshowthatmodesAandBshowlittlechangefromvaryingthemorphingrateorangle.ThisresultissimplyduetothefactmodesAandBhavealreadyconvergeduponzerobeforeanyinertialeectshavebeenintroduced. 172

PAGE 173

A B C D Figure6-56. Stabilitymodechangevstimechange:10degrees(|),20degrees()-222()-222()]TJ /F1 11.955 Tf 33.21 0 Td[(),30degrees(---)A)2secondsB)5secondsC)10secondsD)20seconds Conversely,modesCandDdoexperiencetheeectsofinertiaandthereforeshowlargedierencesastimeprogresses.ObservationsofFigures 6-56 6-57 suggestthatastheallowablemorphingtimeisreduced,thedeviationincoincidentmodesshapesincrease.Thisobservationleadstothefollowingintuitiveresult;asthemorphingtimeisreduced,theoveralleectsofinertiaincrease,andthereforeproducelargersystemerrorswhicharepreviouslyunaccountedfor. ThepolesetscorrespondingtotheaforementionedstabilitymodesareshowninFigures 6-58 6-59 .Likethetrendshownwiththestabilitymodes,thepolesetsalsodeviateintimebaseduponthemoprhingrateorangle.Thisobservationisintuitivedue 173

PAGE 174

A B C Figure6-57. Stabilitymodechangevsdegreechange:20seconds(|),10seconds()-203()-204()]TJ /F1 11.955 Tf 32.77 0 Td[(),5seconds(---),2seconds()A)10degreesB)20degreesC)30degrees tothefactthatthepolesetsaredirectlycomputedfromthestabilitymodes.ItshouldbenotedthatinFigures 6-59 A6-59 B,thatsomepolesetsseemtoconvergeuponaconstantvalue.Thisconvergingactionisduetothefactthattherespectivepolesethasreachedtheendofitsmorphingmaneuverandhasindeedbecometime-invariant.Thesystem'stime-invariancedemonstratesthatthestateequationisT-periodicandthereforeavalidrepresentationofthetime-varyingpolesetcanbegivenbythesystem'sfrozentimeeigenvalue[ 86 ].AnotherimportantobservationderivedfromFigures 6-58 6-59 isthattwopolesetscreateahighfrequency,oppositephase,oscillatingpair,whiletheothertwopolesetscreatealowfrequency,oppositephase,oscillatingpair.Recallfromthe 174

PAGE 175

previouslyshownmechanicalsystemexamplethatanoppositephase,oscillatingpolepairisrepresentativeofdiscretecomplex-conjugatepolepair.Usingthisfact,itcanstatedthatthepolesetsgeneratedforthelongitudinalaircraftexamplearedirectlycomparabletotheclassicallydenedtimeinvariantphugoidandshortperioddynamicmodes. A B C D Figure6-58. Polechangevstimechange:10degrees(|),20degrees()-221()-223()]TJ /F1 11.955 Tf 33.2 0 Td[(),30degrees(---)A)2secondsB)5secondsC)10secondsD)20seconds Togainabetterunderstandingforthedampingandfrequencyelementsoftheselongitudinalaircraftmodes,letusconsiderasinglecasewheretheaircraftmorphs30degreesin10seconds.Thecorrespondingpolesets,stabilitymodes,andorthonormalvectormatrixareshowninFigures 6-60 6-62 175

PAGE 176

A B C Figure6-59. Polechangevsdegreechange:20seconds(|),10seconds()-222()-222()]TJ /F1 11.955 Tf 33.21 0 Td[(),5seconds(---),2seconds()A)10degreesB)20degreesC)30degrees ThepolesetsfoundinFigure 6-60 Aoscillatedirectlyaboutlineswhicharecontinuousrepresentationsofthefrozentimeeigenvalues.Aconclusion,similartothatfoundwiththemechanicalsystemexample,canbedrawnsuchthattheaverageoftheoppositephase,oscillatingpolesetpairscanbeusedtondthedampingofthedynamicmodalresponses.Figure 6-60 Aalsoillustratesaninitialtransientregionwheretwopolesetsswap.Thisregion,alongwiththeill-conditionedregionfortheshort-period-likepolesetsaredisregarded.ItcanbeseenfromFigure 6-60 A6-60 Bthattheill-conditionedregionfortheshort-period-likepolesetsdirectlycorrelatestothetime 176

PAGE 177

A B Figure6-60. Longitudinalaircraft30degree,10secondmorphA)polesets:polesets1and2()-222()-222()]TJ /F1 11.955 Tf 33.21 0 Td[(),polesets3and4(---),time-invariantfrozentimeeigenvalues(|)B)stabilitymodes:mode1(|)mode2()-222()-222()]TJ /F1 11.955 Tf 33.21 0 Td[()mode3(---)mode4() thatthecorrespondingstabilitymodesconvergeuponzero.Thisisthesameintuitiveresultthatwasshownearlierinthemechanicalsystemexample. Animportantobservationtakenfromthepreviousmechanicalsystemexample,inSection 4.4 ,wasthatthedynamicmodalfrequenciescouldbestudiedbylookingattheperiodicityofthecolumnvectorsinQ.Thissameobservationcanbeappliedtothelongitudinalaircraftexample.Fromthisexample,itcanbeseenthatcolumnvectors1and2,asseeninFigure 6-61 ,describeresponseswithagreaterperiodicitythanthatfoundincolumnvectors3and4,asshowninFigure 6-62 Therelativedierencesinperiodicityonceagainsuggeststhatthereexistscomparabletraitsbetweenthecalculatedtime-varyingdynamicmodesandtheclassicallydenedtime-invariantphugoidandshort-perioddynamicmodes.Figures 6-62 A6-62 Drepresentthecolumnvectorsthatdescribethehighlydamped,higherfrequencytime-varyingpolesets,andlikethepolesets,thecolumnvectorsbecomeill-conditionedasthecorrespondingstabilitymodesconvergeuponzero.ThisresultisduetothefactthatthemultiplicationofQandRmustlinearlycombinetocreatethesimulatedstateresponses,asshowninFigure 6-63 177

PAGE 178

A B Figure6-61. LongitudinalaircraftQcolumnvectors1and2for30degree,10secondmorph:A)Q11(|)Q21()-222()-222()]TJ /F1 11.955 Tf 33.21 0 Td[()Q31(---)Q41()B)Q12(|)Q22()-222()-222()]TJ /F1 11.955 Tf 33.21 0 Td[()Q32(---)Q42() Thestatesforthisexampleareu(thebodyrelatedx-axisvelocity(m/s)),w(thebodyrelatedz-axisvelocity(m/s)),q(themeasuredpitchrate(deg/s)),and(themeasuredpitchangle(deg)),wheretheirrelativeresponsesareshowninFigures 6-63 A6-63 D.RecallthatthestateresponsesareunforcedresponseswiththeinitialconditionvectordescribedbyEquation 6{6 266666664u0w0q00377777775=26666666415000377777775(6{6) 6.6FeedforwardControl 6.6.1MorphingBasis Thepolynomialbasisusedtoconstrainthemass-springexample,showninSection 5.4.3 ,willalsobeusedasthebasisconstraintforthisexample.Recall,thatanymorphingtrajectoryisrestrictedtoathird-orderpolynomialoftimeandmustliewithinthesetofallpolynomialswithrealcoecients,asseeninEquation 5{11 178

PAGE 179

A B C D Figure6-62. LongitudinalaircraftQcolumnvectors3and4for30degree,10secondmorph:A,B)Q13(|)Q23()-222()-222()]TJ /F1 11.955 Tf 33.21 0 Td[()Q33(---)Q43()C,D)Q14(|)Q24()-222()-222()]TJ /F1 11.955 Tf 33.21 0 Td[()Q34(---)Q44() Thecoecientsofthemorphingtrajectoryareboundedsuchthattheaircraftneversweepsitswingspast30deg.Thehigher-ordertermsinthepolynomialhavethepotentialtodominateastimeincreases;consequently,thesetermsarerestrictedmorethanthelower-orderterms. Theprocedureofdeterminingtheinitialboundsactuallyndsthecoecientssequentiallybyconsideringonlyonecoecienttobeanon-zerovalueatatime.Indongso,thesolutiondeterminesthemaximumcontributionneededbyeachmorphingcoecienttoremainwithin30deg.ThisprocedurecanbeshowninEquation 6{7 179

PAGE 180

A B C D Figure6-63. LongitudinalaircraftstateresponsesA)state1(u)B)state2(w)C)state3(q)D)state4() iti=30 (max(t))ii=0;:::;3(6{7) Also,aconstraintisintroducedsuchthatj(t)j30forallvaluesoftime.Thisconstraintnotesthatthedesiredsignalisassumedtobeboundedandthusthesystemmustexperiencerealisticgeometrychange.Thecoecientsofeachpolynomialareadditionallylimitedtomaintainthisboundedcondition. TheresultingboundsonthecoecientsaregiveninTable 6-10 180

PAGE 181

A B C D Figure6-64. Longitudinalaircraftcolumneigenvectorsfor30degree,10secondmorph:A)V11(|)V21()-222()-222()]TJ /F1 11.955 Tf 33.21 0 Td[()V31(---)V41()B)V12(|)V22()-222()-222()]TJ /F1 11.955 Tf 33.21 0 Td[()V32(---)V42()C)V13(|)V23()-222()-222()]TJ /F1 11.955 Tf 33.21 0 Td[()V33(---)V43()D)V14(|)V24()-221()-223()]TJ /F1 11.955 Tf 33.2 0 Td[()V34(---)V44() Table6-10. Boundsoncoecientofmorphingbasis CoecientUpperBoundLowerBound 030-3012-220.133-0.13330.009-0.009 181

PAGE 182

6.6.2TrackingASystemResponse 6.6.2.1Polynomialmorphing Asetofdesiredresponsesaregeneratedusingpolynomialmorphing.Thesepolynomialsrangeasarst-order,second-orderandthird-orderfunctions.TheoptimizedvaluesofthemorphingcommandsaregeneratedforfeedforwardcontrolandshowninTable 6-11 .TheoptimizedmorphingisessentiallyidenticaltothedesiredmorphingwhichisanticipatedsincethedesiredmorphingcanbeexactlyduplicatedbythemorphingbasisofEquation 5{11 Table6-11. Optimalpolynomialmorphingtotrackdesiredpolynomialmorphing desiredactual 5+1:5t5+1:5t1:8t)]TJ /F1 11.955 Tf 11.96 0 Td[(0:08t21:8t)]TJ /F1 11.955 Tf 11.96 0 Td[(0:08t27)]TJ /F1 11.955 Tf 11.95 0 Td[(0:25t)]TJ /F1 11.955 Tf 11.95 0 Td[(0:1t2+0:008t37)]TJ /F1 11.955 Tf 11.95 0 Td[(0:25t)]TJ /F1 11.955 Tf 11.95 0 Td[(0:1t2+0:008t3 Theoptimizedstateresponses,muchliketheoptimizedmorphingtrajectories,areessentiallyidenticaltothedesiredstateresponses.TheseresponsesareshowninFigure 6-65 Anotherdesiredresponseisattemptedtobetrackedusingthepolynomialmorphing;however,thisdesiredresponseisassociatedwithamorphingcomposedofasinusoidaladdedtoapolynomial.ThisdesiredmorphingcannotbeduplicatedusingtherestrictedbasisofEquation 5{11 sosomeerrormustresultinthetracking.TheoptimizedpolynomialformorphingisgiveninTable 6-12 alongwiththisdesiredmorphing. Table6-12. Optimalpolynomialmorphingtotrackdesiredsinusoidalmorphing desiredactual 0:75t+cos(t)0:7874+0:153t)]TJ /F1 11.955 Tf 11.95 0 Td[(0:0819t2+0:0025t3 TheresultingstateresponseisshowninFigure 6-66 asreasonablyclosetothedesireresponse.Someerrorispresentaroundthepeaks;however,thedesiredmorphingliescloseenoughtothetherangeofthemorphingbasissuchthatthefeedforwardcontrolisnearlyabletoprovidethecorrecttracking. 182

PAGE 183

A B C Figure6-65. DesiredResponse(|)andOptimalResponse()-221()-223()]TJ /F1 11.955 Tf 33.2 0 Td[()forA)First-OrderMorphingandB)Second-OrderMorphingandC)Third-OrderMorphing 6.6.2.2Piecewise-polynomialmorphing Apiecewise-polynomialmorphingisagainconsideredtoexpandtherangeofthemorphingbasisseeninEquation 5{11 .Thesameconstraintsplacedonthepiecewise-polynomialtechniqueseeninthemass-springexampleapplyhere.Recall,themorphingbasisisallowedtobearst-orderpolynomialwhosecoecientscanvaryatdiscretepointsintime;whereitisalsorequiredthattheoverallmorphingbecontinuousthroughouttheentireresponse. Applyingthepiecewise-polynomialtechniquetothesinusoidalmorphingresponse,resultsintheoptimizedvaluesgiveninTable 6-13 183

PAGE 184

Figure6-66. DesiredResponse(|)andOptimalResponse()-221()-223()]TJ /F1 11.955 Tf 33.2 0 Td[()forSinusoidalMorphing Table6-13. Optimalpiecewise-polynomialmorphingtotrackdesiredsinusoidalmorphing desiredactual 0:75t+cos(t)1:245)]TJ /F1 11.955 Tf 11.96 0 Td[(0:103t:0t2:973:693+0:852t:2:97
PAGE 185

Figure6-67. DesiredResponse(|)andOptimalResponse()-221()-223()]TJ /F1 11.955 Tf 33.2 0 Td[()forSinusoidalMorphing showninTable 6-14 .Itisagainseenthattheoptimizedmorphingisessentiallyidenticaltothedesiredmorphing. Table6-14. Optimalpolynomialmorphingtotrackdesiredpolynomialmorphing desiredactual 8+0:75t8+0:75t)]TJ /F1 11.955 Tf 9.3 0 Td[(3+1:25t+0:02t2)]TJ /F1 11.955 Tf 9.3 0 Td[(3+1:25t+0:02t2)]TJ /F1 11.955 Tf 9.3 0 Td[(5+2t)]TJ /F1 11.955 Tf 11.95 0 Td[(0:1t2+0:008t3)]TJ /F1 11.955 Tf 9.3 0 Td[(5+2t)]TJ /F1 11.955 Tf 11.96 0 Td[(0:1t2+0:008t3 Theoptimizedpolesignalsareessentiallyidenticaltothedesiredpolesignals.ThesesignalsareshowninFigure 6-68 Anotherdesiredsignalisattemptedtobetrackedusingthepolynomialmorphing.Thisdesiredsignalisagainassociatedwithamorphingcomposedofasinusoidaladdedtoapolynomial.Forsimplicity,itremainsthesamedesiredsinusoidalmorphingasthatusedforthestateresponse.TheoptimizedpolynomialformorphingisgiveninTable 6-15 alongwiththisdesiredmorphing. Table6-15. Optimalpolynomialmorphingtotrackdesiredsinusoidalmorphing desiredactual 0:75t+cos(t)1:007+0:078t+0:0736t2)]TJ /F1 11.955 Tf 11.96 0 Td[(0:0089t3 185

PAGE 186

A B C Figure6-68. A)ResponsetoMorphingTrajectory:Desired(|),Optimized()-222()-222()]TJ /F1 11.955 Tf 33.21 0 Td[()B)ResponsetoMorphingTrajectory:Desired(|),Optimized()-222()-222()]TJ /F1 11.955 Tf 33.21 0 Td[()C)ResponsetoMorphingTrajectory:Desired(|),Optimized()-222()-222()]TJ /F1 11.955 Tf 33.21 0 Td[() Althoughusingthesamedesiredmorphing,theoptimizedpolynomialinTable 6-15 isdierentfromthatinTable 5-4 .Thisresult,likethatseeninthemass-springexample,issimplyduetotheoptimizationofadierentcostfunction. TheresultingpolesignalisshowninFigure 6-69 .Someerrorispresent;however,thefeedforwardcontrolisagainnearlyabletoprovidethecorrecttracking. 6.6.3.2Piecewise-polynomialmorphing Applyingthepiecewise-polynomialtechniquetothesinusoidalmorphingresponse,resultsintheoptimizedvaluesgiveninTable 6-16 186

PAGE 187

Figure6-69. ResponsetoMorphingTrajectory:Desired(|)andOptimized()-222()-222()]TJ /F1 11.955 Tf 33.21 0 Td[() Table6-16. Optimalpiecewise-polynomialmorphingtotrackdesiredsinusoidalmorphing desiredactual 0:94t+sin(t)1:218)]TJ /F1 11.955 Tf 11.96 0 Td[(0:047t:0t2:979:197)]TJ /F1 11.955 Tf 11.96 0 Td[(0:660t:2:97
PAGE 188

CHAPTER7CONCLUSION Thispaperinvestigatestheeectsofwingsweepontheightcharacteristicsforaminiatureairvehicle.Inparticular,thevariationsadmittedbyamulti-jointmechanismarestudied.Suchamechanismallowsindependentchoiceofinboardandoutboardforeachwing.Thisvehicleisactuallyincorporatingabiologically-inspiredapproachthatnotestherotationsofshouldersandelbowsbygulls.Theassociatedaerodynamicsvaryinbothforceandmomentandthewingsweeprangesacrosssymmetricandasymmetriccongurations.Theresultingightdynamicsdemonstratetheasymmetricsweepisbenecialtomaintainingsensorpointingdespitecrosswinds;consequently,thebiomimeticdesignhasenhancedmissioneectivenessforthisclassofvehicles. Theequationsofmorphingarederivedforamorphingaircraftandshowntoincludetermsassociatedwithasymmetriesandtime-varyinginertias.Acriticaleectoftheseelementstermsisacouplingbetweenthelongitudinalandlateral-directionaldynamics.Essentially,thesetermsindicatethatthetransientbehaviorofmorphingcanbesignicantlydierentthanitssteady-statebehavior.Simulationsoftheclosed-loopbehaviorsforavariablewing-sweepaircraft(bothindivingandturning)indicatetheadverseinuencethatsuchtransientbehaviorcanpotentiallyhaveonmissionperformance.Inbothcases,theresultinginertiasproducedduringthetransientresponseresultedinrespectivelongitudinalandlateraltranslationsthatcausedthevehicletomissitstarget. Thispaperalsopresentsndingsbasedonobservationstakenfromparametercomputations[ 86 ]fortwodierentlineartime-varyingsystems.Comparisonsbetweenthetwotime-varyingexamplesaremade,fromwhichconclusionsaredrawnonhowtosolveforanddescribeasystem'stime-varyingdynamicmodes.Specically,itisshownthatforaparticularmorphingaircraftmaneuver,thelongitudinaltime-varyingparametersresembletheclassicallydenedtime-invariantphugoidandshort-periodcharacteristics. 188

PAGE 189

Thedampingandfrequencyrelatedtothetime-varyingdynamicmodesarefoundtoberelatedtotheaverageoftwooppositephase,oscillatingpolesetsandcolumnvectorperiodicityoftheorthonormalQmatrix,respectively.Itshouldbenotedthatduetothenatureofthedynamicmodesderivedinthispaper,onlyoscillating,complex-conjugatepolesandmodeswerestudied. Lastly,thispaperpresentsndingsbasedonamorphingcontroloftwodierentlineartime-varyingsystems.Comparisonsbetweenthetwotime-varyingexamplesaremade,fromwhichconclusionsaredrawnforthetrackingcapablilityofafeedforwarddesign.Specically,itisshownforparticularaircraftmorphingtrajectories,thatfeedforwardtrackingcanbeachievedondesiredstateresponseandpolevaluesignals.Itisalsoshownthattrackingmaybeperformedusingpiecewise-polynomialtechniques.Currently,feedforwardtrackingispreformedo-lineusingpredenedsignalsasdesiredinput. Futureworkwillconsistofstudyingthelateral-directionalaircraftmodel,fromwhichdenitionsforbothpurelyrealandcomplex-conjugatepolesandmodeswillbediscussed.Also,futureworkwillconsistofimplementingthepreviouslydenedfeedforwardcontrollerinsomeformofmulti-elementfeedbackcontroller.Feedbackwillbeutilizedforpurposesofsignalgeneration,noisecompensationandrobustness. 189

PAGE 190

REFERENCES [1] M.AbdulrahimandR.Lind,"FlightTestingandResponseCharacteristicsofaVariableGull-WingMorphingAircraft,"JournalofAircraft,inreview. [2] M.AbdurahimandR.Lind,"ControlandSimulationofaMulti-RoleMorphingMicroAirVehicle,"JournalofGuidance,ControlandDynamics,inreview. [3] M.Abdulrahim,H.Garcia,andR.Lind,"FlightCharacteristicsofShapingtheMembraneWingofaMicroAirVehicle,"JournalofAircraft,Vol.42,No.1,January-February2005,pp.131-137. [4] A.Y.AganovicandZ.Gajic,"TheSuccessiveApproximationProcedureforFinite-TimeOptimalControlofBilinearSystems,"IEEETransactionsonAu-tomationandControl,Vol.39,No.9,pp.1932-1935,Sept.1994. [5] F.Amato,C.Cosentino,A.S.Fiorillo,andA.Merola,"StabilizationofBilinearSystemsViaLinearState-FeedbackControl,"IEEETransactionsonCircuitsandSystems,Vol.56,No.1,January2009. [6] P.ApkarianandR.J.Adams,"AdvancedGain-SchedulingTechniquesforUncertianSystems,"IEEETransactionsonControlSystemsTechnology,Vol.6,No.1,January1998,pp.21-32. [7] P.ApkarianandP.Gahinet,"AConvexCharacterizationofGain-ScheduledH1Controllers,"IEEETransactionsonAutomaticControl,Vol.40,No.5,May1995,pp.853-864. [8] R.K.ArningandS.Sassen,"FlightControlofMicroAirVehicles,"AIAA-2004-4911. [9] J.Bae,T.M.Seigler,D.J.InmanandI.Lee,"AerodynamicandAeroelasticConsiderationsofaVariable-SpanMorphingWing,"JournalofAircraft,Vol.42,No.2,March-April2005,pp.528-534. [10] B.R.ABarmish,"NecessaryandSucientConditionsforQuadraticStabilizabilityofanUncertainSystem,"JournalofOptimation,Theory,andApplication,Vol.46,1985,pp.399-408. [11] G.BeckerandA.Packard,"RobustPerformanceofLinearParametricallyVaryingSystemsusingParametrically-DependentLinearFeedback,"Systems&ControlLetters,Vol.23,1994,pp.205-215. [12] J.D.BendtsenandK.Trangbaek,"RobustQuasi-LPVControlBasedonNeuralState-SpaceModels,"IEEETransactionsonNeuralNetworks,Vol.13,No.2,March2002,pp.355-368. [13] K.Boothe,K.FitzpatrickandR.Lind,"ControllersforDisturbanceRejectionforaLinearInput-VaryingClassofMorphingAircraft,"AIAAStructures,StructuralDynamicsandMaterialsConference,April2005,AIAA-2005-2374. 190

PAGE 191

[14] J.Bowman,"AordabilityComparisonofCurrentandAdaptiveandMultifunctionalAirVehicleSystems,"AIAA-2003-1713. [15] J.Bowman,B.SandersandT.Weisshar,"EvaluatingtheImpactofMorphingTechnologiesonAircraftPerformance,"AIAA-2002-1631. [16] S.Boyd,L.ElGhaoui,E.FeronandV.Balakrishnan,LinearMatixInequalitiesinSystemandControlTheory,SIAM,Philadelphia,PA,1994. [17] C.Bruni,A.GipillpandG.Koch,"BilinearSystems:AnAppealingClassof'NearlyLinear'SystemsinTheoryandApplication,"IEEETransactionsonAutomaticControl,Vol.19,1974,pp.334-348. [18] C.E.S.Cesnik,H.R.LastandC.A.Martin,"AFrameworkforMorphingCapabilityAssessment,"AIAAStructures,StructuralDynamicsandMaterialsConference,April2004,AIAA-2004-1654. [19] C.E.S.Cesnik,A.ArborandE.L.Brown,"ActiveWarpingControlofaJoined-Wing/TailAirplaneConguration,"AIAAStructures,StructuralDynamicsandMaterialsConference,April2003,AIAA-2003-1715. [20] A.Chakravarthy,D.T.GrantandR.Lind,"Time-VaryingDynamicsofaMicroAirVehiclewithVariable-SweepMorphing,"AIAAGuidance,NavigationandControlConference,Chicago,IL,August2009,AIAA-2009-6304 [21] B.M.Chen,RobustandH1Control,TheSpringerCompany,2000. [22] J.C.CockburnandB.G.Morton,"LinearFractionalRepresentationsofUncertainSystems,"Automatica,Vol.33,No.7,1997,pp.1263-1271. [23] V.ConstanzaandC.ENeuman,"OptimalControlofNon-LinearChmeicalReactorsViaanInitial-ValueHamiltonianProblem,"OptimalControlApplicationsandMethods,Vol.27,pp.41-60,2006. [24] R.F.Curtain,"State-SpaceApproachestoH1ControlForInnite-DinmesionalLinearSystems,"TransactionsoftheInstituteofMeasurementandControl,Vol.13,No.5,1991,pp.253-261 [25] H.D'Angelo,LinearTime-VaryingSystems:AnalysisandSynthesis.Boston,MA:Allyn&Bacon,1970. [26] C.Desoer,andJ.Schulman,"Zerosandpolesofmatrixtransferfunctionsandtheirdynamicalinterpretation,"IEEEtrans.CircuitsSyst.,vol.CAS-21,pp.3-8,Jan.1974. [27] R.C.DorfandR.H.Bishop,ModernControlSystems,10thed.UpperSaddleRiver,NJ:Prentice-Hall,2005 191

PAGE 192

[28] J.C.Doyle,"AnalysisofaFeedbackSystemWithStructuredUncertainties,"IEEEProceedings-D,Vol.129,1982,pp.242-250. [29] J.C.Doyle,K.Glover,P.P.Khargonekar,andB.A.Francis,"StateSpaceSolutionstotheStandardH2andH1ControlProblems,"IEEETransactionsonAutomationandControl,Vol.19,1989,pp.831-847. [30] M.Drela,andH.Youngren,"AVL-AerodynamicAnalysis,TrimCalculation,DynamicStabilityAnalysis,AircraftCongurationDevelopment,"AthenaVortexLattice,v.3.15,http://raphael.mit.edu/avl/. [31] E.L.Duke,R.F.AntoniewiczandK.D.Krambeer,DerivationandDenitionofaLinearAircraftModel,NASA-RP-1207,August1988. [32] M.Ekman,"SuboptimalControlfortheBilinearQuadraticRegulatorProblem:ApplicationtotheActivatedSludgeProcess,"IEEETransactionsonControlSystemsandTechnology,Vol.13,No.1,pp.162-168,January2005. [33] B.EtkinandL.D.Reid,DynamicsofFlightStabilityandControl,3rded.JohnWiley&Sons,Inc.,1996 [34] S.M.Ettinger,M.C.Nechyba,P.G.IfjuandM.Waszak,"Vision-GuidedFlightStabilityandControlforMicroAirVehicles,"ProceedingsoftheIEEEConferenceonIntelligentRobotsandSystems,2002,pp.2134-2140. [35] E.Feron,P.ApkarianandP.Gahinet,"AnalysisandSynthesisofRobustControlSystemsviaParameter-DependentLyapunovFunctions,"IEEETransactionsonAutomaticControl,Vol.41,No.7,July1996,pp.1041-1046. [36] I.Fialho,G.J.Balas,A.K.Packard,J.RenfrowandC.Mullaney,"Gain-ScheduledLateralControloftheF-14AircraftduringPoweredApproachLanding,"JournalofGuidance,ControlandDynamics,Vol.23,No.3,May-June2000,pp.450-458. [37] I.FialhoandG.J.Balas,"RoadAdaptiveActiveSuspensionDesignUsingLinearParameter-VaryingGain-Scheduling,"IEEETransactionsonControlSystemsTechnology,Vol.10,No1,January2002,pp.43-54. [38] A.Filippone,"FlightPerformanceofFixedandRotaryWingAircraft,"AmericanInstituteofAeronauticsandAstronautics,Reston,VA,2006,pp.251-253. [39] G.Floquet,AnnalesScientiquesdeI'EcoleNormaleSuperieure,(2)8,p.49,1879 [40] R.A.FreemanandP.V.Kokotovic,RobustNonlinearControlDesign,Birkhauser,BostonMA,1996. [41] P.Gahinet,P.ApkarianandM.Chilali,"AneParameter-DependentLyapunovFunctionsandRealParametricUncertainty,"IEEETransactionsonAutomaticControl,Vol.41,No.3,March1996,pp.436-442. 192

PAGE 193

[42] P.Gahinet,A.Nemirovski,A.J.LaubandM.Chilali,LMIControlToolbox,TheMathworks,Natick,MA,1995. [43] S.E.GanoandJ.E.Renaud,"OptimizedUnmannedAerialVehiclewithWingMorphingforExtendedRangeandEndurance,"AIAA-2002-5668. [44] F.H.Gern,D.J.Inman,andR.K.Kapania,"StructuralandAeroelasticModelingofGeneralPlanformWingswithMorphingAirfoils,"AIAAJournal,Vol.40,No.4,April2002,pp.628-637. [45] K.GloverandJ.C.Doyle,"State-SpaceFormulaeforAllStabilizingControllersThatSatisfyanH1-NormBoundandRelationstoRiskSensitivity,"SystemandControlLetters,Vol.11,1988,pp.162-172. [46] D.T.Grant,M.AbdulrahimandR.Lind,"FlightDynamicsofaMorphingAircraftutilizingIndependentMultiple-JointWingSweep,"AIAAAtmosphericFlightMechanicsConference,Keystone,CO,August2006,AIAA-2006-6505. [47] Grant,D.T.andLind,R.,"EectsofTime-VaryingInertiasonFlightDynamicsofanAsymmetricMorphingAircraft,"AIAAAtmosphericFlightMechanicsConference,HiltonHead,SC,August2007,AIAA-2007-6487. [48] K.Gu,"H1ControlofSystemsUnderNormBoundedUncertaintiesinAllSystemMatrices,"IEEETransactiononAutomationandControl,Vol.39,1994,pp.1320-1322. [49] P.O.Gutman,"StabilizingControllersforBilinearSystems,"IEEETransactionsonAutomationandControl,Vol.AC26,No.4,pp.917-922,August1981. [50] Y.Heryawan,H.C.Park,N.S.Goo,K.J.Yoon,andY.H.Byun,"DesignandDemonstrationofaSmallExpandableMorphingWing,"ProceedingsofSPIE-Volume5764,May2005,pp.224-231. [51] D.E.Hill,J.R.Baumgarten,andJ.T.Miller,"DynamicSimulationofSpin-StabilizedSpacecraftwithSloshingFluidStores,"JournalofGuidance,ControlandDynamics,Vol.11,No.6,November-December1988,pp.597-599. [52] M.Y.Hsiao,C.H.LiuandS.H.Tsai,"ControllerDesignandStabilizationForAClassofBilinearSystems,"IEEETransactionsonCircuitsandSystems,Vol.56,No.1,January2009. [53] R.A.HornandCRJohnson,MatrixAnalysis.Cambridge,U.K.:CambridgeUniv.Press,1990993,vol.3,pp.519-522. [54] A.Isidori,NonlinearControlSystems,Springer-VerlagInc.,Berlin,1995. [55] A.IsidoriandA.Astol,"DisturbanceAttenuationandH1ControlViaMeasurementFeedbackinNonlinearSystems,"IEEETransactiononAutoma-tionandControl,Vol.37,1992,pp.1283-1293. 193

PAGE 194

[56] H.Jerbi,"GlobalFeedbackStabilizationofaNewClassofBilinearSystems,"Syst.ControlLett.,Vol.42,No.4,pp.313-320,April2001. [57] C.O.Johnston,D.A.Neal,L.D.Wiggins,H.H.Robertshaw,W.H.Mason,andD.J.Inman,"AModeltoComparetheFlightControlEnergyRequirementsofMorphingandConventionallyActuatedWings,"AIAAStructures,StructuralDynamicsandMaterialsConference,April2003,AIAA-2003-1716. [58] S.P.Joshi,Z.Tidwell,W.A.CrossleyandS.Ramakrishnan,"ComparisonofMorphingWingStrategiesBasedUponAircraftPerformanceImpacts,"AIAAStruc-tures,StructuralDynamicsandMaterialsConference,April2004,AIAA-2004-1722. [59] E.W.Kamen,"Thepolesandzeroesofalineartime-varyingsystem,"inLinearAlgebraAppl.,1988,vol.98,pp.263-289. [60] E.W.Kamen,"Ontheinnerandouterpolesandzerosofalinear,time-varyingsystem,"inProc.IEEEConf.DecisionandControl,Austin,TX,Dec.1988,pp.910-914. [61] P.P.Khargonekar,I.R.PetersonandM.A.Rotea,"H1OptimalControlWithStateFeedback,"IEEETransactiononAutomationandControl,Vol.33,1988,pp.786-788. [62] P.P.Khargonekar,I.R.PetersonandK.Zhou,"RobustStabilizationofUncertainLinearSystems:QuadraticStabilizabilityandH1ControlTheory,"IEEETransac-tiononAutomationandControl,Vol.35,1990,pp.356-361. [63] J.J.Kehoe,R.S.Causey,M.AbdulrahimandR.Lind,"WaypointNaviagtionforaMicroAirVehicleusingVision-BasedAttitudeEstimation,"AIAAGuidance,NavigationandControlConference,August2005. [64] J.J.Kehoe,J.Grzywna,R.Causey,R.Lind,M.NechybaandA.Kurdila,"ManeuveringandTrackingforaMicroAirVehicleusingVision-BasedFeedback,"SAEWorldofAviationCongress,November2004. [65] H.K.Khalil,NonlinearSystems,PrenticeHall,NewJersey,1996. [66] N.S.Khot,F.E.Eastep,andR.M.Kolonay,"MethodforEnhancementoftheRollingManeuverofaFlexibleWing,"JournalofAircraft,Vol.34,No.5,September-October1997,pp.673-678. [67] J.KimandN.Koratkar,"EectofUnsteadyBladePitchingMotiononAerodynamicPerformanceofMicrorotorcraft,"JournalofAircraft,Vol.42,No.4,July-August2005,pp.874-881. [68] B.S.Kim,Y.J.Kim,andM.T.Lim,"RobustH1StateFeedbackControlMethodsforBilinearSystems,"IEEEProc.-ControlTheoryAppl.,Vol.152,No.5,Sept.2005. 194

PAGE 195

[69] V.B.KolmanovskiiandN.I.Koroleva,"OptimalControlofSomeBilinearSystemsWithAftereect,"PMMU.S.S.R.,Vol.53,No.2,1989,pp.183-188. [70] S.KwakandR.Yedavalli,"NewModelingandControlDesignTechniquesforSmartDeformableAircraftStructures,"JournalofGuidance,ControlandDynamics,Vol.24,No.4,July-August2001,pp.805-815. [71] S.Lall,K.Glover,,"RobustPerformanceandAdaptationUsingRecedingHorizonH1ControlofTime-VaryingSystems,"ProceedingsoftheAmericanControlConference,1995,pp.2384-2389. [72] B.S.Lazos,"BiologicallyInspiredFixed-WingCongurationStudies,"JournalofAircraft,Vol.42,No.5,September-October2005,pp.1089-1098. [73] L.H.LeeandM.Spillman,"Robust,Reduced-Order,LinearParameter-VaryingFlightControlforanF-16,"AIAAGuidance,NavigationandControlConference,August1997,AIAA-97-3637,pp.1044-1054. [74] T.Liu,K.Kuykendoll,R.RhewandS.Jones,"AvianWings,"AIAA-2004-2186. [75] L.Ljung,SystemIdentication:TheoryfortheUser.EnglewoodClis,NJ:Prentice-Hall,1987 [76] R.Longchamp,"StableFeedbackControlofBilinearSystems,"IEEETransactionsonAutomationandControl,Vol.AC25,No.2,pp.302-306,April1980. [77] M.H.Love,P.S.Zink,R.L.Stroud,D.R.Bye,andC.Chase,"ImpactofActuationConceptsonMorphingAircraftStructures,"AIAA-2004-1724. [78] A.G.J.MacFarlaneandN.Karcanias,"Polesandzerosoflinearmulti-variatesystems:Asurveyofalebraic,geometricandcomplex-variabletheory,"Int.J.Control,vol.24,no.1,pp.33-74,1976. [79] D.McLean,AutomaticFlightControlSystems,ThePrentice-HallCompany,NewYork,NY,1990. [80] T.Melin,AVortexLatticeMATLABImplementationforLinearAerodynamicWingApplications,M.S.Thesis,RoyalInstituteofTechnology,Stockholm,Sweden,2000. [81] R.R.Mohler,NonlinearSystems:ApplicationtoBilinearControl,ThePrentice-HallandEnglewoodClisCompanies,NewJersey,1991. [82] A.NatarajanandH.Schaub,"LinearDynamicsandStabilityAnalysisofaTwo-CraftCoulombTetherFormation,"JournalofGuidance,ControlandDy-namics,Vol.29,No.4,July-August2006,pp.831-838. [83] R.C.Nelson,FlightStabilityandAutomaticControl,TheMcGraw-HillCompanies,Boston,MA,1998. 195

PAGE 196

[84] R.A.Nicols,R.T.ReichertandW.J.Rugh,"GainSchedulingforH-InnityControllers:AFlightControlExample,"IEEETransactionsonControlSystemTechnology,Vol.1,No.2,June1993,pp.69-79. [85] U.M.L.Norberg,"Structure,FormandFunctionofFlightinEngineeringandtheLivingWorld,"JournalofMorphology,No.252,2002,pp.52-81. [86] R.T.O'BrienandP.Iglesias,"Polesandzerosfortime-varyingsystems,"Ph.D.dissertation,Dept.Elect.Comp.eng.,TheJohnsHopkinsUniv.,Baltimore,MD,1997. [87] K.Ogata,ModernControlEngineering,Prentice-Hall,UpperSaddleRiver,NJ,2002,pp.843-909. [88] K.Ogata,SystemDynamics,EnglewoodClis,NJ:Prentice-Hall,1978 [89] R.I.OliverandS.F.Asokanthan,"Control/StructureIntegratedDesignforFlexibleSpacecraftundergoingOn-OrbitManeuvers,"JournalofGuidance,ControlandDynamics,Vol.20,No.2,March-April1997,pp.313-319. [90] A.Packard,"GainSchedulingviaLinearFractionalTransformation,"SystemsandControlLetters,Vol.22,1994,pp.79-92. [91] G.Papageorgiou,K.Glover,G.D'MelloandY.Patel,"DevelopmentofaReliableLPVModelfortheLongitudinalDynamicsofDERAsVAACHarrier,"AIAAGuidance,NavigationandControlConference,August2000,AIAA-2000-4459. [92] I.R.Peterson,"DisturbanceAttentuationandH1Optimization:ADesignMethodBasedonTheAlgebraicRicattiEquation,"IEEETransactiononAutomationandControl,Vol.32,1987,pp.427-429. [93] B.C.Prock,T.A.WeisshaarandW.A.Crossley,"MorphingAirfoilShapeChangeOptimizationwithMinimumActuatorEnergyasanObjective,"AIAA-2002-5401. [94] D.L.RaneyandE.C.Slominski,"MechanizationandControlConceptsforBiologicallyInspiredMicroAirVehicles,"AIAA-2003-5345. [95] A.V.Rao,DynamicsofParticlesandRigidBodies:ASystematicApproach,CambridgeUniv.Press,Cambridge,NY,2006,pp.42-51. [96] J.Roskam,AirplaneFlightDynamicsandAutomaticFlightControls,DARcorporation,Lawrence,KS,2001. [97] W.J.Rugh,LinearSystemTheory,2nded.EnglewoodClis,NJ:Prentice-Hall,1993. [98] W.J.RughandJ.S.Shamma,"ResearchonGainScheduling,"Automatica,Vol.36,2000,pp.1401-1425. 196

PAGE 197

[99] M.T.Rusnell,S.E.Gano,V.M.Perez,J.E.Renaud,andS.M.Batill,"MorphingUAVParetoCurveShiftforEnhancedPerformance,"AIAA-2004-1882. [100] M.Sampei,T.Mita,M.Nakamichi,"AnAlgebraicApproachtoH1OutputFeedbackControlProblems,"SystemsandControlLetters,Vol.14,1990,pp.13-24 [101] B.Sanders,F.E.Eastep,andE.Forster,"AerodynamicandAeroelasticCharacteristicsofWingswithConformalControlSurfacesforMorphingAircraft,"JournalofAircraft,Vol.40,No.1,January-February2003,pp.94-99. [102] B.Sanders,G.Reich,J.JooandF.E.Eastep,"AirVehicleControlUsingMultipleControlSurfaces,"AIAAStructures,StructuralDynamicsandMaterialsConference,April2004,AIAA-2004-1887. [103] M.Secanell,A.SulemanandP.Gamboa,"DesignofaMorphingAirfoilforaLightUnmannedAerialVehicleusingHigh-FidelityAerodynamicShapeOptimization,"AIAA-2005-1891. [104] J.S.ShammaandJ.R.Cloutier,"Gain-ScheduledMissileAutopilotDesignUsingLinearParameterVaryingTransformations,"JournalofGuidance,ControlandDynamics,Vol.16,No.2,March-April1993,pp.256-263. [105] P.Shi,S.P.Shue,Y.ShiandR.K.Agarwal,"ControllerDesignforBilinearSystemswithParametricUncertainties,"MathematicalProblemsinEngineering,Vol.4,1999,pp.505-528. [106] S.P.Shue,"OptimalandH1SuboptimalFeedbackControlofDynamicalNonlinearSystemsforControlofWingRockMotion,"Ph.D.Dissertation,WichitaStateUniversity,Spring1997. [107] W.Shyy,M.BergandD.Ljungqvist,"FlappingandFlexibleWingsforBiologicalandMicroAirVehicles,"ProgressinAerospaceSciences,Vol.35,No.5,1999,pp.455-506. [108] K.C.Slatton,W.E.Carter,R.L.ShresthaandW.Dietrich(2007),AirborneLaserSwathMapping:Achievingtheresolutionandaccuracyrequiredforgeosurcialresearch,Geophys.Res.Lett.,34,L23S10,doi:10.1029/2007GL031939. [109] J.SlotineandW.Li,AppliedNonlinearControl,PrenticeHall,1990. [110] R.SmithandA.Ahmed,"RobustParametricallyVaryingAttitudeControllerDesignsfortheX-33Vehicle,"AIAAGuidance,NavigationandControlConference,August2000,AIAA-2000-4158. [111] E.D.Sontag,"ALyapunov-LikeCharacterizationofAsymptoticControllability,"SIAMJournalonControlandOptimization,Vol.21,1983,pp.462-471. [112] S.S.Sorley,"IdenticationandAnalysisofTime-VaryingModalParamters,"UniversityofFloridaMaster'sThesis,2010 197

PAGE 198

[113] A.G.Sparks,"LinearParameterVaryingControlforaTaillessAircraft,"AIAAGuidance,NavigationandControlConference,August1997,AIAA-97-3636,pp.1035-1043. [114] C.H.SpennyandT.E.Williams,"LibrationalInstabilityofRigidSpaceStationduetoTranslationofInternalMass,"JournalofGuidance,ControlandDynamics,Vol.14,No.1,January-February1991,pp.31-35. [115] B.L.StevensandF.L.Lewis,AircraftControlandSimulation,JohnWileyandSons,Hoboken,NJ,2003,pp.308-338. [116] W.Tan,A.K.PackardandG.J.Balas,"Quasi-LPVModelingandLPVControlofaGenericMissile,"AmericanControlConference,2000,pp.3692-3696. [117] G.Tao,S.Chen,J.FeiandS.M.Joshi,"AnAdaptiveActuatorFailureCompensationSchemeforControllingaMorphingAircraftModel,"IEEECon-ferenceonDecisionandControl,December2003,pp.4926-4931. [118] S.W.ThurmanandH.Flashner,"RobustDigitalAutopilotDesignforSpacecraftEquippedwithPulse-OperatedThrusters,"JournalofGuidance,ControlandDynamics,Vol.19,No.5,September-October1996,pp.1047-1055. [119] H.D.Tuan,E.Ono,P.ApkarianandS.Hosoe,"NonlinearH1ControlforanIntegratedSuspensionSystemviaParametrizedLinearMatrixInequalityCharacterizations,"IEEETransactionsonControlSystemsTechnology,Vol.9,No.1,January2001,pp.175-185. [120] S.VenkataramananandA.Dogan,"DynamicEectsofTrailingVortexwithTurbulenceandTime-VaryingInertiainAerialRefueling,"AIAA-2004-4945. [121] M.S.VestandJ.Katz,"AerodynamicStudyofaFlapping-WingMicroUAV,"AIAA-99-0994. [122] R.Wall,"TakingShape,"AviationWeekandSpaceTechnology,January5,2004,pp.54-56. [123] R.Wall,"DarpaEyesMaterialsForMorphingAircraft,"AviationWeekandSpaceTechnology,January5,2004,pp.54-56. [124] B.Wie,"SolarSailAttitudeControlandDynamics,Part2,"JournalofGuidance,ControlandDynamics,Vol.27,No.4,July-August2004,pp.536-544. [125] J.R.Wilson,"MorphingUAVsChangeShapeofWarfare,"AerospaceAmerica,February2004,pp.28-29 [126] M.Y.Wu,"Onstabilityoflineartime-varyingsystems,"Int.J.Systs.Sci.,vol.15,no.2,pp.137-150,1984. 198

PAGE 199

[127] M.Y.Wu,"Anewconceptofeigenvaluesandeigenvectorsanditsapplications,"IEEETrans.Automat.Contr.,vol.AC-25,pp.824-826,May1980. [128] J.YuandA.Sideris,"H1ControlWithParametricLyapunovFunctions,"SystemsandControlLetters,Vol.30,pp.57-69,1997. [129] K.Zhou,andP.Khargonekar,"AnAlgebriacRicattiEquationApproachtoH1Optimization,"SystemsandControlLetters,Vol.11,pp.85-91,1988. [130] J.J.Zhu,"PD-spectraltheoryformultivariablelineartime-varyingsystems,"inProc.IEEEConf.DecisionandControl,SanDiego,CA,Dec.1197,pp.3908-3913. [131] J.J.ZhuandC.D.Johnson,"Uniedcanonicalformsformatricesoveradierentialring,"LinearAlgebraAppl.,vol.147,pp.201-248,1991. 199

PAGE 200

BIOGRAPHICALSKETCH DanielThurmondGrantwasborninGainesville,Floridain1983.Asachild,heoftenfoundhimselfintriguedbythemechanicaloperationofremote-controlledtoys.Whennotlostinapileofnutsandbolts,hefoundenjoymentinbuildingmodelairplaneswithhisfather.Thecombinationofthesetwohobbieseventuallyledhimtodevelopastrongpassionforaeronauticalengineering.DanielgraduatedfromSantaFeHighSchoolin2002,afterwhichheenrolledattheUniversityofFlorida.WhileanundergraduateattheUniversityofFlorida,DanieljoinedtheMicro-AerialVehicle(MAV)Laboratory,wherehelearnedhowtobuildandysmallUnmannedAerialVehicles(UAVs).Thishands-onexperienceallowedDanieltoco-leadaDesign,Build,Fly(DBF)teamthatplacedninthataninternationalAIAAstudentcompetitionheldinWichita,Kansas.Asasenior,DanieljoinedtheFlightControlLabattheUniversityofFlorida,wherehedesigned,builtandewamulti-jointed,wing-sweepingMAV.Upongraduatinginthefallof2006,DanielenrolledintograduateschoolattheUniversityofFlorida.Danielreceivedhismaster'sdegreeinthespringof2009andthenhisdoctorateinthespringof2011.BothdegreesDanielearnedwereinaerospaceengineeringwithaprimaryfocusonadvancedightcontrolsanddynamics.Throughouthiscollegiatecareer,Danielexperiencedamultitudeofhighlightingevents.Theseeventsincludedbutnotlimitedto: WinningthetheAtmosphericFlightMechanicsstudentbestpaperawardatthe2006Guidance,Navigation,andControlConferenceinKeystone,Colorado TravelingtoWashingtonD.C.topresenthisworkforCongressduringtheeveningofaPresidentialStateoftheUnionAddress ObtainingaU.S.patentforhisworkonmorphingandurbancamouage ReceivingtheopportunitytoincludehisworkinandauthorabookchapterpublishedfortheAIAAeducationalseries FeaturinghisworkinnumerousdocumenturiesincludingNationalGeogrpahic,theScienceChannel,andSirDavidAttenborough'sim,"FlyingMonsters3D" 200