Legal Consciousness, Human Rights, and the Thai War on Drugs

Material Information

Legal Consciousness, Human Rights, and the Thai War on Drugs
Wongsinnak, Suchat
Place of Publication:
[Gainesville, Fla.]
University of Florida
Publication Date:
Physical Description:
1 online resource (253 p.)

Thesis/Dissertation Information

Doctorate ( Ph.D.)
Degree Grantor:
University of Florida
Degree Disciplines:
Criminology, Law, and Society
Criminology, Law and Society
Committee Chair:
Lanza-Kaduce, Lonn M.
Committee Members:
Spillane, Joseph F.
Hollinger, Richard C.
Harrison, Faye V.
Graduation Date:


Subjects / Keywords:
Attorneys ( jstor )
Criminal law ( jstor )
Criminals ( jstor )
Drug dealers ( jstor )
Killing ( jstor )
Laws of war ( jstor )
Narcotics ( jstor )
Police ( jstor )
Violence ( jstor )
War ( jstor )
Criminology, Law and Society -- Dissertations, Academic -- UF
criminality, declaratory, human, justice, kha, legal, localization, methamphetamine, practice, rights, schema, state, thai, thaksin, vernacularization, ya
Electronic Thesis or Dissertation
born-digital ( sobekcm )
Criminology, Law, and Society thesis, Ph.D.


This research explores how human rights professionals and Thai citizens (who were affected by the war on drugs in 2003) understood what happened in terms of both domestic and human rights legalities. During the anti-drug campaign, the government relied on the rhetoric of ?kha-tad-ton,? to attribute a pattern of violence to drug dealers. It labeled anyone affected by the war on drugs as being involved with drugs. Eighteen aggrieved people and twelve human rights professionals were interviewed. The research employed active semi-structured interviews that were flexible enough for the respondents to present their own issues as well as to respond to questions prepared by the researcher. Because of official labels, victims were presumed to deserve their fate?they were presumed to be involved with drugs. To overcome the presumptions, the aggrieved had to prove that they were not involved with drugs. Their struggle for justice was limited to moving themselves back into the mainstream by securing a legal declaration that they were undeserving victims of the crackdown. Their experiences with the bureaucracy and the courts instructed them about domestic law and the underlying structure of justice in Thailand. They were constrained from pursuing justice against anyone who may have violated their rights. Their only ?possible? justice was to make a human rights claim to the National Human Rights Commission. By so doing the aggrieved took part in creating a human rights legality. This research identifies three schemas that human rights professionals used to invoke and apply the idea of human rights. The supplemental schema grafts human rights notions ?with? the domestic law to advance the individual interests of the aggrieved. The progressive schema pits the idea of international human rights ?against? the state action and its domestic legal practice. Finally, the transformative schema moves the idea of human rights ?outside? the realm of law. It challenges the social values and society more generally rather than the domestic law and the state specifically. The three schemas are not independent from each other but are related and can help explain how human rights awareness can be used to protect against abuses. ( en )
General Note:
In the series University of Florida Digital Collections.
General Note:
Includes vita.
Includes bibliographical references.
Source of Description:
Description based on online resource; title from PDF title page.
Source of Description:
This bibliographic record is available under the Creative Commons CC0 public domain dedication. The University of Florida Libraries, as creator of this bibliographic record, has waived all rights to it worldwide under copyright law, including all related and neighboring rights, to the extent allowed by law.
Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of Florida, 2009.
Adviser: Lanza-Kaduce, Lonn M.
Electronic Access:
Statement of Responsibility:
by Suchat Wongsinnak.

Record Information

Source Institution:
University of Florida
Holding Location:
University of Florida
Rights Management:
Copyright Wongsinnak, Suchat. Permission granted to the University of Florida to digitize, archive and distribute this item for non-profit research and educational purposes. Any reuse of this item in excess of fair use or other copyright exemptions requires permission of the copyright holder.
Embargo Date:
Resource Identifier:
489206506 ( OCLC )
LD1780 2009 ( lcc )


This item has the following downloads:

Full Text




2 2009 Suchat Wongsinnak


3 To Kanya and Kittikun, my great parents


4 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I have been extremely fortunate to have Professor Lonn Lanza -Kaduce as my committee chair Without his industrious support this dissertation would not have taken place. Throughout the project, h e never let me down even though many problems stormed in I can say that he is the great est teacher and the most wonderful friend I ever have in the United States My lear ning experiences have also been fostered by Professor Faye Harrison who provided me constant care and encouragement to complete this brave project I am very thankful to Professor Richard Hollinger for his unyieldin g support Joseph Spillane a young professor, also provided me a lot of encouragement since the time that this dissertation project was still a prospectus. He gave me intellectual credit by suggesting that one of his American supervisees read my proposal This made me confident to invest more effort in th e project I am grateful to Kessarin Tiewsakul Ekkachai Pinkeaw, Noraut Soonthornpook, and Atchara Shayakul from the Office of National Human Rights Commission of Thailand I would like to thank Somchai P reechasilpakul from Chiang Mai Universitys Law School and Dr. Puangthong Rungswasdisab from Department of Political Science Chulalongkorn University, Thailand, for their shared idea about Thai society, law and violence. I also thank Dr. Pannipa Prompiboo n, a young microbiologist, who kept encouraging me My deepest gratitude extends to all respondents I interviewed. T heir opinions and experiences make this dissertation come true. They all are brave people Last ly I am indebted to my great mother the mo st important source of energy in my life. Al though she knows nothing about the project she always believes I am doing right and good things for people I miss very much my great father who passed away ten years ago Without him, I w ould not be who I am ri ght now.


5 TABLE OF CONTENTS page ACKNOWLEDGMENTS .................................................................................................................... 4 LIST OF TABLES ................................................................................................................................ 8 ABSTRACT .......................................................................................................................................... 9 CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION ....................................................................................................................... 11 Introduction ................................................................................................................................. 11 Specific Aims .............................................................................................................................. 12 Outline of Chapters ..................................................................................................................... 14 2 BACKGROUND OF THE WAR ON DRUGS IN 2003 ......................................................... 15 Background of Tha i Politics and Laws ...................................................................................... 15 Politics .................................................................................................................................. 15 Laws in Books ...................................................................................................................... 19 Constitution and human rights .................................................................................... 19 Justice in personam ...................................................................................................... 21 Justice in rem ................................................................................................................ 26 Dr ug Problems Before the War .................................................................................................. 30 The War on Drugs ....................................................................................................................... 41 3 LITERATURE REVIEW ........................................................................................................... 59 Introduction ................................................................................................................................. 59 Legal Consciousness ................................................................................................................... 62 The Social Practice of Human Rights ........................................................................................ 67 Transnational Legality ......................................................................................................... 67 The Implication of Transnational Legality ........................................................................ 71 Vernacularization of Transnational Legality ..................................................................... 74 4 METHODOLOGY ...................................................................................................................... 77 Introduction ................................................................................................................................. 77 Data Collection ............................................................................................................................ 79 Active Interview .................................................................................................................. 79 The Social Performance of Interview ................................................................................. 81 Rese arch Setting and Samples ............................................................................................ 83 Settings .......................................................................................................................... 83 Samples ......................................................................................................................... 83 Analysis ....................................................................................................................................... 88 Demographics .............................................................................................................................. 90


6 Aggrieved People ................................................................................................................. 90 Human Rights Professionals ............................................................................................... 90 5 DOMESTIC LEGAL POLICY AND PRACTICE ................................................................... 91 Criminalization of the Victims ................................................................................................... 92 Kha Tad Ton ........................................................................................................................ 92 Presumption of Guilt ........................................................................................................... 95 Blacklists a Source of Accusations by Pointing a Finger ........................................... 99 The Practice of Using Uncorroborated Evidence ............................................................ 100 Planting Evidence .............................................................................................................. 104 Legal Con sequences for the Victims of the Criminalization .................................................. 105 Property Forfeiture ............................................................................................................. 105 Getting a Day in Court ...................................................................................................... 109 Losing Other Benefits ........................................................................................................ 110 The Impunity of the Authorities Practice without Accountability ...................................... 111 Preventing Professional Conflict ...................................................................................... 112 Lawyers as Peace Makers ................................................................................................. 114 Waiver ................................................................................................................................ 115 The Realities of Taking on the State ................................................................................ 115 The Role of Money ................................................................................................................... 116 Legal Gratuities for Better Service ............................................................................... 117 Other Costs of Pursuing Justice ........................................................................................ 121 6 NAMING, BLAMING, AND CLAIMING: A DECLARATORY JUSTICE ...................... 1 25 Naming the Problems of the War on Drugs ............................................................................ 125 The Violence of Law Enforcement .................................................................................. 125 Undeserved Victims .......................................................................................................... 127 The Community and Fear Community Support for Violence ..................................... 128 Blaming the Blamers ................................................................................................................. 131 Rumors ............................................................................................................................... 131 Conflict with the Police or Influential People .................................................................. 132 Guilt by Association .......................................................................................................... 133 An Embarrassment of Riches ............................................................................................ 134 Police with False Information about the Victim .............................................................. 135 Poli cy Targets and Reward Incentives ............................................................................. 135 Claiming a Possible Justice ................................................................................................... 137 Distributing a Lot of Complaints ...................................................................................... 137 Experiencing Bureaucratic Loop of Justice ..................................................................... 139 Pursuing Human Rights Justice through Declaratory Claims ......................................... 140 7 PEOPLES LEGAL CONSIOUSNESS TOWARDS DOMESTIC LEGAL PRACTICES .............................................................................................................................. 145 Police as the Locus of Power They Were Above the Law ................................................... 146 Ordinary People as Powerless They Were Under the Law ................................................. 149


7 Were Just People (Whove been Admonished Not to Challenge the Heavens) ... 149 Were Not Visible to the Authorities ................................................................................ 153 Our Words are Not Convincing ........................................................................................ 154 Money and Connections were Part of Law ............................................................................. 157 The Role of Money ............................................................................................................ 158 We Have No Sen -Sai ..................................................................................................... 159 8 THE PRACTICE OF HUMAN RIGHTS ................................................................................ 163 Supplemental Human Rights Schema ...................................................................................... 166 Law Enforcement as a Problem ........................................................................................ 166 Human Rights as Principle ................................................................................................ 168 Humanization of the Legal Practice as Strategy .............................................................. 170 Progre ssive Human Rights Schema ......................................................................................... 173 The Oppression by the Government as a Problem .......................................................... 173 Human Rights as Force ..................................................................................................... 177 Internationalization of the Violence as Strategy .............................................................. 179 Transformative Human Rights Schema ................................................................................... 182 Peoples Thought as a Problem ........................................................................................ 182 Human Rights as a Cultural Value ................................................................................... 187 Spatialization as Strategy .................................................................................................. 190 9 DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION ...................................................................................... 193 Violence, Society, and Law ...................................................................................................... 194 The Lack of Fit of Justice with Law ........................................................................................ 200 Establishment of Human Rights Legality ................................................................................ 210 Conclusion and Suggestion for Future Research .................................................................... 220 APPENDIX A MAP OF THAILAND .............................................................................................................. 225 B ENGLISH INFORMATION SHEET ...................................................................................... 226 C THAI INFORMATIO N SHEET .............................................................................................. 228 D ENGLISH INTERVIEW GUIDE ............................................................................................ 230 E THAI INTERVIEW GUIDE .................................................................................................... 233 LIST OF REFERENCES ................................................................................................................. 237 THAI STATUTES CITED .............................................................................................................. 251 THAI OFFICIAL DOCUMENTS CITED ...................................................................................... 251 BIOGRAPHICAL SKETCH ........................................................................................................... 253


8 LIST OF TABLES Table page 2 1 The number of drug offenses (cases) classified by types of drugs in 19892 002 .............. 32 2 2 The number of cases, offenders and amount of methamphetamine arrested in 20032007 ......................................................................................................................................... 58


9 Abstract of Dissertation Presented to the Graduate School of the University of Florida in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy LEGAL CONSCIOUSNESS, HUMAN RIGHTS, AND THE THAI WAR ON DRUGS By Suchat Wongsinnak August 2009 Chair: Lonn Lanza -Kaduce Major: Cr iminol ogy, Law and Society This research explores how human rights professionals and Thai citizens (who were affected by the war on drugs in 2003) understood what happened in terms of both domestic and human rights legalities D uring the anti -drug campaig n, t he government relied on the rhetoric of kha tad ton, to attribute a pattern of violence to drug dealers It labeled anyone affected by the war on drugs as being involved with drugs. Eighteen aggrieved people and twelve human rights professionals were interviewed. The research employed active semi -structured interview s that were flexible enough for the respondent s to present their own issues as well as to respond to questions prepared by the researcher Because of official labels, victims were presumed to deserve their fatethey were presumed to be involved with drugs. To overcome the presumptions, the aggrieved had to prove that they were not involved with drugs. Their struggle for justice was limited to moving themselves back in to the mainstream by se curing a legal declaration that they were undeserving victims of the crackdown. The ir experience s with the bureaucracy and the courts instructed them about domestic law and the underlying structure of justice in Thailand. They were constrained from pursuing justice against anyone who may have violated their rights. Their only possible


10 justice was to mak e a human rights claim to the National Human Rights Commission By so doing the aggrieved took part in creating a human rights legality This research iden tifies t hree schemas that human rights professionals used to invoke and apply the idea of human rights The supplemental schema grafts human rights notions with the domestic law to advance the individual interests of the aggrieved. T he progressive schema pits the idea of international human rights against the state action and its do mestic legal practice. Finally, the transformative schema mov es the idea of human rights outside the realm of law. It challenges the social values and society more generall y rather than the domestic law and the state specifically. The three schemas are not independent from each other but are related and can help explain how human rights awareness can be used to protect against abuses.


11 CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION Introduction T he United Nations is not my father, said Thaksin Shinnawatra, the former Thai Prime Minister, after the United Nations expressed concern about the widespread killings during the war on drugs and wanted to send Asma Jahangir a special rapporteur to gather information (The Nation, March 4 a 2003). Within the three months (February to April 2003) almost three thousand people were officially reported to be killed (see Independent Committee fo r the Investigation, Study and Analysis of the Formation and Implementation of Narcotics Suppression Policy 2008) Most killings were labeled as drug related killings. The Thai rhetoric of kha tad t on was invented by the government to convince the socie ty that drug dealers killed each other However, human r ights professionals uncovered a different story. Many people killed during the war on drugs did not have a record of involvement with drugs and some people were killed simply because they used to be drug users (Amnesty International 2003; Human Rights Watch 2004; National Human Rights Commission of Thailand 2006a; 2006b; 2008) The National Human Rights Commission of Thailand (NHRC) in its human rights examination reports, involved both international human rights and domestic laws to denounce the ruthless conduct of the state auth orities, especially the police, as grave human righ ts violation s during the war on drugs The atrocities of the war on drugs w ere also internationalized in many ways. The United Nations, Human Rights Watch, Amnesty International, and Asian Human Rights Commission promptly criticized and published the repor ts capturing the painful stories of the victims and blaming the government for de molishing the rule of law. The foreign news agencies such as Straits Times, The Singapore, Kor ea Herald, Herald Sun (Australia), Scotland on Sunday, CNN, Sydney Morning Herald (Australia), The Daily Telegraph (London),


12 to name a few broadcast internationally the storie s of the war on drugs and its atrocities. The United States also condemned the Thai government for human rights abuses in its annual report on human rights pract ice of Thailand (U.S. Department of State 2004) Pressured from both within and outside the country, the Thai government tried to neutralize the critique through a promise of investigating and arrest ing the unknown assailants who k ill ed many people during the time of the drug war. The issues were rhetorically legalized under the criminal justice where no one until now, ha s been arrested and charged for the killings To relieve the criticism, o n March 3, 2003, the government held a seminar aiming to reach an understanding of the diplomats from 54 countries and the representatives of United Nations Office of Drugs and Crime (UNODC) and the Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights (OHCHR) (Office of the Narcotics Control Board 2003a, 15) T he war on drugs is the first time in Thailand that the idea of human rights was used stra tegically to shift problems of ordinary crim es defined in domestic law to grave human rights violation, defined by transnational human rights condemned by international community The push and pull of these two domains of law in action seem to be missed from both human rights study in general, and law and society research in particular. It is the ultimate goal of this dissertation t r ying to fulfill t his knowledge gap. Specific Aims The main purpose of this dissertation is to examine the legal conscious ness of people who are affected by the war on drugs and of human rights professionals whose work is related to law and justice during and after the war on drugs. T he research aims to study how domestic Thai law and transnational human rights formulations have played out during and after the war on drugs in 2003. In addition, the research seeks to learn about h ow people understand the ways in which domestic law and transna tional human rights law apply in the aftermath of the war on drugs and


13 h ow domestic law and transnati onal human rights law serve people who were affected by the war on drugs. People may reject all or some of either of the legal frameworks; they may accept one to the exclusion of the other, or they may translate the frameworks so that they fi t with their particular problems and situations in local communities. The different classes of socio-legal actors may see the role of law differently; the aggrieved may have a different perception or consciousness about law. This is a study of law in socia l practice. Therefore, t he specific research questions that I attempt to answer regarding legal consciousness about law and justice within the context of the war on drugs include: 1 What legal and social experiences have the respondents (human rights profess ionals and the aggrieved (affected) people ) learned from the war on drugs? How do they understand the legal practice s that occurred during and after the war? 2 How do the aggrieved come to think in term s of rights? What do they think about their grievance s ? Who m do they blame for their grievance s ? How do they recognize the benefit of making a claim of rights? 3 How do the nature of disputes and the problems affect the ir struggle for justice (the aggrieved and human rights professionals) when taking into account the larger social environment ? 4 How do the aggrieved draw on laws to make sense of their experience? Specifically, how do laws offer them meanings for their social life? H ow do other non-legal frameworks influence their perception about law ? What are those non -legal frameworks? 5 How do human rights professionals translate the idea of human rights int o the local setting in regard to the issue s of violence, law and justice within the context of the war on drugs? How do the aggrieved contribute to the creation of a human rights legality? Enough time has now passed since the war on drugs so that we can assess how law has operated in addressing the problems associated with it. Archival materials in Thailand will be consulted to understand what happened during the war on drugs and to provide context for this study of how people are using different legal approaches to deal with the problems that arose from the war on drugs. The study will use active interviews to learn about how sociolegal actors working in the


14 dome stic legal and human rights systems in Thailand interpret and apply law to war on-drug cases as well as how those who were affected (the aggrieved) deal with the two realms of law Outline of Chapters The n ext chapter provides a background of Thai politi cs and relevant laws. To understand more nuance d relationship s among law, society and justice, it is important to know some thing about the unique political and socio legal structures of Thai society The chapter also introduces information about the rampant spreading of drug s ( e.g., methamphetamine) justifying the declaration of the war on drugs in 2003. Then, the chapter ends with the story of the war on drugs in aspect of le gal practice and abuses of rights Chapter 3 turns to the literature review to est ablish the theoretical framework for the study Chapter 4 presents the methodology. The research relies on qualitative inquiry to understand the complic ated worlds of the respondents when they talk about law and justice within the context of the war on drugs. The chapter ends with presenting the summary of the demographic s of the respondents. Then, chapt er s 5 to 7 put up the findings o f this research in detail. Chapter 5 talks about the legal practice that the respondents perceived and experienced in that t ime. Chapter 6 explores how the aggrieved people thought about their rights. Their struggle for justice within the bureaucracy is also presented together with the ir effort to make human rights claim Chapter 7 offers more nuance perceptions and experiences with law the aggrieved people encountered Law seems to be something that deempower s and further marginal izes them from any justice. This chapter also presents peoples reflection of self in relation to law. Chapter 8 illuminates how human rights professi onals translate the idea of human rights into the local practice. Three schemas are identified from the data. Finally, Chapter 9 wraps up the research with discussion and conclusion with a reflection along with the relevant literature .


15 CHAPTER 2 BACKGROUND OF THE WAR ON DRUGS IN 2003 Background of Thai Politics and Laws Politics Thailand was formerly known as Siam until the name was changed to Thailand in 1939. Thailand shares borders with Burma in the west and north, with Laos and Cambodia in the east, and with Malaysia in the south. See the map in Appendix A. Thailand is the only country in Southeast Asia which has never been physically colonized by the Western powers. However, freedom came with a price. During the European Expansionism, Thailand was force d to engage in biased -bilateral treaties first with Great Britain in 1855, the Bowring Treaty, and followed by other powers. These treaties, among other things, created extraterritoriality. The treaties privileged foreigners to not be tried under Siam (Tha i) courts These treaties, in fact, formed semi -colonial relationship s through international legal mechanism s As noted by Horowitz (2005, 445), t hese treaties were unequal in several sense s: they were forced at gunpoint [and] they expressed the economic and political interests of Britain and other powers; key provisions, including extraterritoriality and restrictions on tariffs on foreign trade, were not reciprocal. S ome W estern countries even insisted that they had a treaty right to reject all Thai laws to be applied in the communities they resided (Sayre 1928, 734) Thus, Thailand was pressured to adopt W estern legal system to regain judicial powers independence, and to curtail a justification for colonialization Th e law reform began in the reign of King Rama IV (18511868) and was carried on in full force by Chulalongkorn, or King Rama V (1868 1910), one of Thailands most revered kings. After taking the side of the Allied Powers during the WWI, Thailand successfull y persuaded President Woodrow Wilson of the United States to relinquish extraterritoriality in 1920. Then,


16 the Thai government (King Rama VI) employed Francis B. Sayre, a former professor of international law at Harvard University and the son in law of Pre sident Woodrow Wilson, to help terminate these similar treaties with the European nations (Darling 1970, 205) To be a modern state, Thai k ings also provided many scholarships for Thai students to study abroad. The scholarships were no longer limited to people in the royal families. Prince Rabi, a son of King Chulalongk orn, had graduated from a law school in Europe and became the first minister of the Ministry of Justice (Darling 1970, 205) He is well known as the founder of moder n Thai law. Thai government scholarships are still granted to Thai students to study abroad in various fields It was Pridi Ponomyong, a Thai government scholar ship student studying law in Fra nce who led the Peoples Party in a bloodless revolt to abrogat e King Prajadhipok (Rama VII)s absolute status, and the absolute King became a constitutional monarch in 1932. Since then, the Thai King has been placed outside and above most political affairs (but see Suvarnajata 1994, 7290; Winichakul 2008, 21) However, from the year 1932 onwards, Thai politics has been characterized by the dynamics of military dominance, interrupted by occasional short lived civilian premiers (Hindley 1976, 173 74; Samudavanija 1990) From June 1932 to February 1991 (58 years and 8 months), Thailand experienced twenty three coup s detat, both with success and failure. During that time, a military coup would occur every 2.56 years on average (Suvarnajata 1994, 143) F ifteen years from the coup in 1991, it happened again. T he coup detat in September 2006 suggests that the mili tary is an integral part of Thai -style democracy. In this style, military officers see themselves as guardian s of a moral order rather than a s evildoer s for the politics (Christensen 1991, 95) but only so long as it is. The new sovereign s orders and declarations are law. T he failed coup will be cast as an evildoer and charged with the crime of


17 rebellion (or k abot in Thai). Chai -Anan Samudavanija (1 982, 12 emphasis in original) portrays the vicious cycle of Thai politics excellently. Successful military interventions usually resulted in the abrogation of constitutions, abolishment of parliaments, and suspension of participant political activity. Ea ch time, however, the military re -established parliamentary institutions of some kind. While they often claimed that they had taken power from the elected representati ves in order to save democracy, paradoxically, in their view parliament had to be aboli shed because the people established what they called Thai -style democracy with an appointed legislature designed to legitimize their own power. Soon, however, crisis would set in, leading once again to a coup situation. The corrupt ed and ineffective elected government were often a justification for the military and technocrats to intervene with coups d etat (Christensen 1991; Neher 1976, 370) P ublic opinion usually felt deeply abject about the corrupted politicians (Dalpino 1991, 62) Thus, the public did not resist military coup s with rare exception The protest in May 1992 was a recent exception It is believed that many protesters were killed or brutalized or disappear ed at the hands of the military, although the government i n that time announced only forty people died in the May 1992 incident (Baker and Pongpaichit 2005, 24346; Yoshifumi 2008, 31114) The chaos subsided because of the intervention of the k ing and a general election that was called in that year (Yoshifumi 2008, 5557) People around the country also expressed strong reaction to military. It was hoped the military would lea rn not to get involved with politics again. As one Thai political scientist remarked; Civil -military relations in Thailand have changed dramatically since the pro -democ racy uprising in May 1992. The army has been forced to withdraw from politics and to accept civilian and democratic rule. It has had to learn to adapt to a democratic environment. The militarys traditional control over defense budgets, appointments of high raking officers, and defense policy has eroded, and it has had to accept that civilians now have final say in these matters (Bunbongkarn 1999, 67) The bloodshed of M ay 1992 pressured Thailand to address the challenge of setting up a stable democracy for and by people. It resulted in a process of drafting the 1997 Constitution (B.E.


18 2540), which involved people from all sectors of the society. It was the sixteenth Cons titution of Thailand known as the p eoples Constitution, and it guaranteed a wider range of basic rights and liberties than found in previous versions of Thailands constitutions (Aphornsuvan 2001, 1; Nanakorn 2002, 90) Police Lieutenant Colonel Thaksin Shinawatra was a former Thai government scholarship student with a Ph. D in Criminology from the U S who later became one of Thailands richest businessmen. He founded the Thai Rak Thai Party in 1998. He won l andslide victories in general election s in 2001 and in 2005 which made him the first prime minister of Thaila nd to complete a full four -year term in office, the first to be reelected, and the first to preside over a government composed entirely of ministers from one party (Pongsudhirak 2008, 142) These might be viewed as good signs of a stable democracy being installed in Thai politics. In fact, apart from some populist polic ies novel to Thai politics ( e.g., cheap health care, agrarian debt relief, village funds etc. ), he still used money and the old -style Thai politics, to control the votes (Phongpaichit and Baker 2008) For instance, the candidates who were former Members of Parliament (MPs) who joined his party were paid monthly allowances and received large campaign sums (Montesano 2001; Phatharathananuth 2008, 108) Successful in business before, Thaksin also called himself the CEO (chief executive officer) of the country, likening the nation to a company (Pongpaichit 2004) However, his critics viewed his lead ership style as authoritarian abusing power to benefit his family business and re buffing his opponents both in business and politics (Connors 2005; Hicken 2006; Muntarbhorn 2008; Phongphaichit and Baker 2004) T he anti Thaksin campaign gradually gained public support in mid 2004, and later intensified by media mogul Sondhi Limthongkul (in the second half of 2005 ). He unprecedentedly disclosed several highlevel corruptions of the Thaksin administration. The


19 result was a big street protest again st the Thaksin regime in February 2006, led by the group known as the Peoples Alliance for Democracy (PAD) or the Yellow Shirts (see Pye and Schaffar 2008) In the politically di vided society, the military junta, under the name Council for Democratic Reform, grabbed the opportunity to oust Prime Minister Thaksin Shinnawatra in September 19, 2006, without public resistance (see Pathmanand 2008) Again, the militar y played the role of guardian for a harmonious society and the protect or of the monarchy. The junta abolished the 1997 Constitution (B.E. 2540) and later replaced it with the 2007 Constitution (B.E. 2550) (for more information about the politics after the coup, see Pongsudhirak 2008). The numerous and easy abolishment of Constitutions might imply that the rule of law has really not taken root in Thai society. Darling (1970, 21011) noted long ago a reverse effect of Thailand s successful modernization, which occurred too early and quickly, The result was one of the most advanced bureaucratic systems in nonCommunist Asia, but also one of the most underdeveloped political systems. The kingdom had evolved an efficient civil ser vice, but it had made little genuine progress toward some form of constitutional rule. The war on drugs in 2003 disclose s another episode of an efficient Thai bureaucracy that afforded little rule of law during the Thaksin government. To put the Thai dr ug problems and its war on drugs in 2003 in context, relevant features of Thailands effort at rule of law are reviewed. This review will provide a better understanding of the socio legal aspect s of the war on drugs. Laws in Books Constitution and human r i ghts The review begins with the 1997 Constitution (B.E. 2540), which was effective during the time of war on drugs in 2003 before being dismantled by t he coup de tat in September 2006. It is


20 accepted that the 1997 Constitution (B.E. 2540) celebrated the pe rpetuity and inviolability of fundamental human rights. For example, section 4 declared that the human dignity, right s and libert ies of the people shall be protected, while section 26 instituted a positive obligation for s tate authorities to take into account human dignity, rights and liberties of the people when exercising power. The Constitution also posited a negative duty for state authorities not to intervene or restrict rights and liberties guaranteed by the Constitution except by virtue of provisions of the law (section 29). T he intervention or restriction by laws, however, shall not pre empt the essential substances of the rights and liberties protected by the Constitution. Equally important, a person could asse rt constitutional rights to defend hims elf in a court (paragraph 2 of section 28 ). To uphold human rights as a constitutional value in practice, the 1997 Constitution also launched its first National Human Rights Commission (section 199 and 200). It took two years to enact the National Human Ri ghts Commission Act in 1999. Another two years were spent to get it operational. T he first National Human Rights Commissioners were named in July 2001. Section 3 of the National Human Rights Commission Act defines human rights as human dignity, right, liberty and equality of people, which are guaranteed or protected, under the Constitution of the Kingdom of Thailand or under Thai laws or under treaties [with] which Thailand has obligations to comply Among other things, the National Human Rights Commissio n ha s crucial powers and duties to promote the respect for and the practice in compliance with human rights principles at domest ic and international levels, to examine and report the commission or omission of acts which violate human rights or which do no t comply with obligations under international treaties relating to human rights to which Thailand is a party, [and ] to propose appropriate remedial measures to the person or agency committing or omitting such acts for taking action.


21 Although the Act endows the Commission to investigate human rights violations and propose remedies (section s 22 26), nowhere in the Act is enforcement guarantee d Its last resort is to report findings of human rights investigations to the par liament and publish them (section 2 9 31).1 The Commission is prohibited from exercising its jurisdiction over matter s being litigated in the courts or over matter s on which the courts have already passed judgment (section 22). Understanding its limited power Saneh Chamarik (2002, 5) the first president of the Commission diplomatically asserts two functions: the National Human Rights Commission is to organize itself in such a way which se rve s not only as rights defenders, but als o as social learning promoter. The N ational Human Rights Commission was a battlefront against human rights violations during the war on dr ugs in 2003. The Commission actively opened another avenue for justice for people affected by the war on drugs In its annual human rights examination reports concerning the drug war in 2003, the Commission referred to both international human rights laws, especially the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR ), and relevant domestic Thai laws including the 1997 Constitution, Criminal Procedur e Code (CPC), and other laws related to narcotic s offense s which we will now turn to. Justice in p ersonam In this section, I provide some background of Thai criminal proce dures relevant to law enforcement during the war on drugs. The purpose is to provide the idea of law in the book s which is helpful to better understand law i n action during the war time. 1 However, section 257(4) of the current (2007) Constitution (B.E. 2550) resulted from the coup detat in September 2006 adds more power to the National Human Rights Commission to bring the case to the courts of justice for the injured person upon request of such person if it deems appropriate for the resolution of a human rights violation problem as a whole as provided by law.


22 The most relevant domestic law to the war on drugs is the Thai Crimin al Procedure Code (CPC) enforced in 2003. The CPC has already been revised by several amendments, especially by the amendment in 2004, after the war on drugs In fact, the ruthless ness of the war on drugs has not been seen much in the public debate as a fa ilure of the justice system. Simply speaking, Thai society, except for a small group of human rights advocates, do not see the people in the justice system and the justice system itself as problems leading to the un precedent ed civilian killings during the war on drugs in 2003. The Constitution, by theory, is fundamental law and the highest law of land. Put simply, the other laws or administrative acts would be voided if contrary to the Constitution. The theory might fit well the legal practice in Western de mocracies like Fr ance Germany and the United States, but in Thailand the Constitution is rather like a law of dream s (to be). Thai Constitutions, although expressing a high esteem for peoples rights and liberties, have not automatically put these princip les into practice. Justice for people could be pursued only when other laws were literally revised. Vitit Muntrabhorn (2008, 4) a law professor from Chulalongkorn University, Thailand observed that In reality, the safeguards for ordinary people have tended to come from Criminal and Civil Codes and Criminal and Civil Procedure Codes which have remained constant for many years, rather the seemingly ever -changing nature of Thailands Constitution. Before the 1997 Constitution (B.E. 2540), the administrative officers and police were authorized to issue a criminal warrant for arrest and search, while the court could issue all of criminal warrants warrant s for arrest, search, detention, imprisonment, and release. Section 237 of th e 1997 Constitution (B.E. 2540) however, ab olished all power of administrati ve officers and police to issue criminal warrant s Thus, a person w ould be arrested, detained or imprisoned, and the search for the person or property in the private place could b e made only when there is


23 the order or a warrant of the court The same provision also supplied detail for other substantive rules of due process, relevant to law enforcement during the time of war on drugs. In a criminal case, no arrest and detention of a person may be made except where an order or a warrant of the Court is obtained, or where such person commits a flagrant offense or where there is such other necessity for an arrest without warrant as provided by law. The arrested person shall, without del ay, be notified of the charge and details of such arrest and shall be given an opportunity to inform, at the earliest convenience, his or her relative, or the person of his or her confidence, of the arrest. The arrested person being kept in custody shall b e sent to the Co urt within forty eight hours from the time of his or her arrival at the office of the inquiry official in order for the court to consider whether there is a reasonable ground under the law for the detention of the arrested person or not, ex cept for the case of force majeure or any other unavoidable necessity as provided by law. A warrant of arrest or detention of a person may be issued where: 1) there is reasonable evidence that such person is likely to have committed a serious offense which is punishable as provided by law; or 2) there is reasonable evidence that such person is likely to have committed an offense and there also exists a reasonable cause to believe that such person is likely to abscond, tamper with the evidence or commit any other dangerous act. However, section 335 (6) of the same Constitution included a condition that section 237 above would not be enforceable until the CPC had been literally amended in the ways in which section 237 prescribed, but the amendment shall not be later than five years as from the date of the promulgation of the Constitution In fact, not until 2004 (after the drug war), seven years after promulgating the 1997 Constitution, was the CPC substantively amended in accordance with section 237 of the 1997 Constitution. Nonetheless, the literal meaning of section 335 (6) was clear : if the CPC was not revised within five years from the promulgation date of the 1997 Constitution, section 237, as a fundamental and highest law of land, should be self activat ed and applied to all criminal cases. The 1997 Constitution was promulgated on October 11, 1997. Thus, since October 12, 2002, section 237 should be effective, no matter whether the CPC was literally revised. Section 237 should, by principle, have been in force during the time of the drug war in 2003.


24 Section 237 required the inquiry official to bring the arrested person to the court within 48 hours in order for the court to consider whethe r or not there is a reasonable ground under the law for the detenti o n of the arrested person. Nonetheless, an arrested offender perpetrating a narcotic s offen s e may be lawfully detained for more than 48 hours An arrested person in custody of an narcotic s control offic er under the 1976 Narcotic s Control Act (B.E. 2519) d oes not need to be brought to court within 48 hours because a narcotic s officer is not considered to be an inquiry official under the Criminal Procedure Code (CPC) In other words, as found in section 15 of the 1976 Narcotic s Control Act, the narcotic s con trol offic er is distinguishable from the inquiry official ( e.g., police). The 1976 Narcotic s Control Act authorizes the narcotic s control offic ers to keep the person arrested in custody for inquiry for a period of no more than three days. The arrested per son in a narcotic s offense may be interrogated by two different officials at different times and under different laws. That is, after three days of custody, the narcotic s control offic er must deliver the arrested person to the inquiry official ( e.g., polic e) for further proceedings under the CPC (for another 48 hours at most of custody). Therefore, the arrested person in a narcotic s crime might be lawfully kept in custody for up to five days! It should be noted that the officers from the Office of the Narc otic s Control Boa rd and other state agencies, including police, could be appointed as the narcotic s control offic ers under the 1976 Narcotic s Control Act. In fact, many police officers have two identification cards one for being police officer and the othe r for being a narcotic s control offic er The old s ection 83 of the CPC, which was still on the book in the time of drug war did not im pose on the arresting official, as first seen in section 237 of the 1997 Constitution, the duty to notify the arrestee of the criminal charge at the time of arrest. Not until the revised version in


25 2004 did the CPC require the arresting official to notify the arrested offender of the criminal charge at the time of arrest together with notifying that the arrested person is entitled to make a statement or no t and the arrested persons s tatements may be exercised as evidence in the trial of the case, and the arrested person is entitled to see and talk with lawyer or person who will be his lawy er (paragraph 2 of section 83 of the CPC revised in 2004). The amendment in 2004 also entitles the alleged offender to let the lawyer or the person whom he trusts to hear any interrogation s with him (section 134/3 of the CPC revised in 2004). Formerly, the interrogation was often a matt er only between the inquiry official and the alleged offender During interrogation, paragraph 3 of section 133 of the CPC prohibits the inquiry official to advi s e, discour age or to use any kind of fraud to prevent any person from giving statements against his free will. Section 135 forbids the inquiry official from using any deception or threat or promise to an alleged offender for inducing such person to make any particular statement. Should criminal evidence be obtained by violating these provisions tha t evidence might be inadmissible at trial (section 226 of the CPC). There is an exclusionary rule. Section 94 of the C PC also addresses searches. It requires the official to show the search warrant or, in case of a search without a warrant, to provide the name and official position of who is conducting the search to the person being searched. A search in a private place, general ly, is only allowed to be done between sunrise and sunset (section 96 of the C PC ). In addition, before commencing a search in a pri vate place, section 102 of the C PC requires that the official making the search must manifest that he has nothing concealed on his person; and as far as possible the search shall be made in the presence of the occupier of the premises, or a member of his family or failing such person, in the presence of at least two other persons requested by the


26 official to attend as witness. Failure to follow these rules, theoretically, might make materials of evidence from the search inadmissible in court (the exclusio nary rule). In all, laws in the books provide a pretty high standard prioritizing rights and liberties of people in criminal justice. The war on drugs in 2003, however, illuminated the other kind of law, law in action, where the constitutional criminal rul es seemed to be less relevant. Before turning to the 2003 drug war, it is also necessary to address some background of laws dealing with the propert y of the narcotic s offenders because one of the main reasons for people to enter into the drug trade is mone y. In addition, during the 2003 drug war, the government intensively sought to confiscate all properties of people suspected of being involved with drugs. As known in the time of war on drugs, not only were the suspected killed by unknown assailants but al so their propert y was searched and seized by the state authorities (see National Human Righ ts Commission of Thailand 2006a; 2006b; 2008) Justice in r em In general, the court often issue s an order to confiscate instruments, equipment, vehicles, machinery or other properties that were used in or were part of the commission of a criminal offense. However, properties or benefits gained by a commission of narcotic s offense s are often unreachable by the ordinar y criminal law because the drug related property has often already been transferred to other persons or transformed into other forms of assets Thus, it is necessary to have special laws dealing with these kinds of properties or assets. The purpose of forfeiture laws is not to punish the body or person of the alleged offenders as does in the ordinary criminal law, but to diminish their financial base and disrupt the drug networks that sustain illegal activities. For Thailand, there are two special laws dealing with properties connected to narcotics offenses t he 1991 Act on Measures for the Suppression of Offenders in an Offense r elating to


27 Narcot ics (B.E. 2534) (AMSOO N), and the 1999 Anti -Money Laundering Act (B.E. 2542) (AMLA). For a narcotics offense, the aim is to secure forfeiture. Forfeiture under AMSOON relies on finding the offender guilty of the alleged-narcotic s offense. Therefore it is known as a criminal forfeiture. On the contrary, a process of forfeiture under AMLA can proceed in a civil court. The suspected offender does not necessarily have to be in custody or present at the courts trial. In other words, criminal litigation on drug offense is not a prerequisite condition leading to a forfeiture order under AMLA Both laws define the p roperties or assets connected with the commission of narcotic s offen se s in a similar way. For example, those properties under AMSOON are: money or properties or properties obtained through the commission of an offense relating to narcotics, and shall include money or properties which are obtained by means of using such money or properties to purchase or by causing in any manner whatsoever to transform s uch money or properties irrespective of the number of such transformation and whether or not such money or properties will be in the possession of, or transferred to or apparently evidenced on the register as belonging to other persons. (Section 3 of AMSOON ) An important point is that it does not matter how many times a property or asset has been sold, distributed, transferred, or transformed, or found in whosoever possession, or being transferred to whomever, or bearing in registration or record under who soever ownership (section 3 of AMLA). AMSOON establishes the Properties Examination Committee, which has powers and duties, among other things, to examine, seize or attach the suspicious properties of the alleged offender (section 15, 16, and 19). The per son ( e.g., the alleged offender or others) who claims to be the owner of the properties must adduce evidence before the Properties Examination Committee to prove that the properties so examined are not connected with the commission of an offense relating to narcotics or transferred in good faith and for value or reasonably acquired in the course of good moral or public charity (section 22). Failure to do so allows the Properties


28 Examination Committee to seize or attach such properties for no more than one year (section 22). Then, the public prosecutor will file a motion with a criminal court to order the forfeiture of those properties ( early examined by the Properties Examinatio n Committee), in addition to pro ffe ring criminal litigation against the alleged offender for his commission of narcotic s offense (section 27). Thus, seizure or attachment order of the Properties Examination Committee will be voided when the public prosecutor issues a final non prosecution order ( no litigation for a narcotic s offense) or the court passes the final judgment dismissing the criminal charge of the alleged offender (section 32). Departing from the general principle of criminal law on presumption of innocence section 29 of AMSOON takes for granted the presumption of guilt i n that if there is evidence showing that the accused or the examinee is involved or has ever been involved in the commission of an offense relating to narcotics it shall be presumed that all money or properties possessed or acquired by him beyond his sta tus or his capability of engaging in his occupation or other activities in good faith are the properties connected with the commission of an offens e relating to narcotics (section 29). Like the Properties Examination Committee under AMSOON, the Transactio n Committee established by AMLA has duties to restrain any suspicious transaction and seize assets involved in the commission of narcotic s crimes for up to ninety days (three months) (section 34 and 48). It is a duty of any individual who conducts any tra nsaction or an individual who has a vested interest in the asset being seized or restrained to impart evidence to prove that the money and asset in the transaction are not related t o the commission of an offense ( i.e., narcotics ) so that the restrain or s eizure order can be withdrawn (paragraph 4 of section 48).


29 Unlike AMSOON AMLA authorizes the publ ic prosecutor, upon request of the Secretary General of the Anti -Money Laundering Office to file a petition in a civil court to order forfeiture of suspicio us assets without necessarily setting up criminal prosecution against the alleged offender (section 49 and 59). Like a trial for forfeiture under AMSOON in a criminal case, a trial under AMLA in civil court also accepts the presumption of guilt (and by ass ociation) as prescribed in paragraph 2 of section 51 and 52. Consider paragraph 2 of section 51. According to this section, if the claimant in section 50, paragraph 1 is related to or used to be related to any person who committed the predicate offense [na rcotic s offense ] or the offense of money laundering, the presumption shall be that money or asset s are related to an offense or has been transferred dishonestly whichever the case may be. The burden of proof shifts to the citizen to show that he did not gain the property dishonestl y. Because they are based on different legal standpoints (criminal versus civil forfeitures), AMSOON and AMLA can b e applied to the same properties at different times Section 58 of AMLA clearly states: Where the asset involved in the commission of an offense is subjec t to another legal process [ i.e., AMSOON] which has not yet commenced or is pending or of it would be more effective to proceed under this Act, then the Government shall proceed as provided in this Act. Simply speaking, if the forfeiture under AMSOON is terminated because the public prosecut or issues a final non -prosecution order or the criminal court acquits the alleged offender, the relevant authorities can legitimately further the forfeiture under AMLA In practic e, the Office of the Narcotic s Control B oa r d often seeks cooperation from the Anti -Money Laundering Office to implement AMLA where AMSOON is not efficient enough for the forfeiture. Thus, it might be the case that the properties are first seized or attache d (by the Properties Examination Committee) up to one year at the Office of the Narcotic s Control B oa rd under AMSOON, and then seized for additional three months (by the Transaction Committee) at the Anti -Money


30 Laundering Office under AMLA. During the war on drugs in 2003, the relevant state authorities often applied both laws to the properties of the suspected drug dealers (see National Human Rights Commission of Thailand 2006a; 2006b; 2008) N ext, drug problems before the 2003 drug war will be explored to understand the construction of a social threat in Thai soc iety, and then the story of the war on drugs will be introduced. At the onset, note should be taken that creating a sense of threat or moral panic frequently occurs as part of criminalization efforts ( see Hagan 1980 for a review ; see also Ben Yehuda 1986) Drug Problems Before the War Thailand shares her northern border with Burma (Myanmar) and Laos, where the Golden Triangle is located The Golden Triangle has long been one of the main areas for producing opium, heroin, and now methamphetamine and traffick ing them to the world market The mountainous region supplies a climate suited for opium growing It also offers a political climate favorable to the drug trade. T he lucrative drug trade is an important financial source for armed campaigns in the long-stan ding conflicts between the Burmese (Myanmar) government and the ethnic minority groups in the areas preserve (Jelsma, Kramer and Vervest 2005; McCoy 1972; Yawnghwe 1993) Those conflicts and the drug trade have affected Thailand fo r many years. A lthough opium holds a long history in Thai society, a profitable trading network of its derivative, heroin, began around the time of the U.S. Vietnam War (Pongpaichit, Phiriyarangsan and Treerat 1998, 89) In 19691970, the Golden Triangle began producing quality heroin, first supplying US soldiers fighting in South Vietnam, and later exporting to markets in America and Europe (McCoy 2000, 204) Stanton (1976, 562) notes that heroin use was clearl y a Vietnam phenomenon because pre -Vietnam heroin use was uncommon for American society (emphasis in original ). After the end of war, the drug trade networks in Thailand and the Golden Triangle


31 including oversea s destinat ions continued. The amount of heroin and opium produced in Thailand itself is in fact peripheral compared with the Golden Triangles production. Thailand is important because it offers more convenient transportation than do her neighbors Thailand remains the important route for the Golden Triangles drug exports around the world (Cheurprakobkit 2000, 17) The drug problems in Thailand have been aggravated by habitual corruption at all levels of Thai bureaucracy. At the high tide of Khun Sa, the legendary heroin king of the Golden Triangle the former Secretary General of the O ffice of the N arcotics C ontrol B oard (Chavalit Yodmani) admitted that Khun Sa comes in and out of Thailand at will. Some one must be protecting him (Business in Thailand. 1989, 38; see also McCoy 1999) Studying the illegal economy of drug trade in Thailand, Pongpaichit et al (1998, 1056) also found that drug trades were protected or, sometimes, run by powerful figures in the bureaucracy, military, police, and politics. Thus, Thailand is one of the countries in the world that faces all dimensions of the drug problem, production, trafficking, and consumption (Cheurprakobkit 2000; Chouvy and Meissonnier 2004) Before 199 6, cannabis, h eroin and opium were often the top three drugs for which people were arrested by Thai authorities (see Table 2 1) D uring 19891995, increas es for offenses related to cannabis heroin and opium were slight, especially when compared with the rapid increase for methamphetamine. Methamphetamines, however, still led to fewer arrests during those years than did the three classic drugs (cannab is heroin and opium). Thailands role in opium and heroin diminished over time. According to the International Narcotics Control Board (2004, 55) Thailand is no longer a major source of illicit opium and heroin for the world market and especially for the U.S. market The heroin dominating the U.S. market in 1990s came from Columbia (Jelsma 2005, 152) According to U.S. Department of


32 Justice (2003) heroin from the Golden Triangle (including Thailand) accounted for only 10 per cent of the supply in 1999 and only 1 percent in 2002 (cited in Jelsma 2005, 153) Table 2 1. The number of drug offenses (cases) clas sified by types of drugs in 19892002 Year/drugs Heroin Opium Cannabis Methamphetamine (Ya Ba) 1989 14, 479 3, 254 44, 652 921 1990 12, 795 3, 120 37, 408 2, 214 1991 19, 335 3, 700 43, 754 3, 972 1992 21, 995 3, 576 44, 923 5, 827 1993 23, 028 3, 453 48, 271 8, 397 1994 34, 063 4, 064 50, 569 12, 871 1995 40, 902 3, 281 51, 709 20, 373 1996 25, 347 3, 912 44, 759 52, 358 1997 17, 063 3, 960 34, 310 78, 714 1998 12, 423 3, 581 24, 168 114, 874 1999 7, 872 3, 022 22, 720 154, 028 2000 4, 926 2, 4 66 19, 890 180, 287 2001 3, 481 2, 293 20, 508 168, 591 2002 2, 350 1, 942 14, 829 149, 659 Source: The Office of the Narcotics Control Board of Thailand (Report on Statistic and Situation of Drugs in Thailand for B.E. 25352536; Annual Report on Narcot ics Suppression in Thailand for B.E. 2541; and Thailand Narcotics Annual Report for 2003). After the surrender of Khun Sa to the Burmese government in 1996 in return for amnesty, the drug problems in Thailand changed drastically. The price of heroin skyro cketed because of the drastic shortage of heroin (Chouvy and Meissonnier 2004, 25) His arrest was followed by an unprecedented increase of the consumpt ion of m ethamphetamine (Chouvy and Meissonnier 2004, 27; Office of the Narcotics Control Board 1996, 3) In 1996, methamphetamine arrests for the first time surpassed th e arrests for other drugs (see T able 2 1). Methamphetamine became the most frequent dru g offense category for arrests in Thai society according to the Office of the Narcotics Control Board of Thailand (ONCB). In 1996, the United Wa State Army (UWSA) which operated in Burma or Myanmar, replaced Khun Sa as the major supplier of methamphetamin e to the drug markets


33 S witching from heroin to methamphetamine, the producers could utilize their heroin supply trading network for methamphetamine, according to The Nation (August 6 1999). In 1997, ONCB (1997, 17) claimed that about 2 3 mil lion tablets of methamphetamine were smuggled into Thailand In 2001 alone, it was estimated that about 700 million tablets were smuggled into the country (Office of the Narcotics Control Board 2001, 10) In that year, about 70 clandestine methamphetamine laboratories were located in neighboring countries (Myanmar or Burma and Lao s ) (9). Myanmar is the largest producer of this drug in Southe ast Asia, importing ephedrine (one of the main ingredients ) from China (Treerat, Wannathepsakul and Lewis 2000, 100) For exam ple, according to The Nation (March 10 a 2001), the United Wa State Army (UWSA), linked to an ethnic group resid ing in the Shan State of Myanmar, produced hundreds of thousands of methamphetamine tablets (called speed pills) each day during 2001. Across the Thai -Myanmar border, 87 methamphetam ine laboratories were identified in 2001 with 15 different routes of smuggl ing drug s into Thailand ( The Nation, March 10b 2001). At least two of the labora tories located in Myanmar were reported at that time to be owned by Thai nationals (The Nation, May 9, 2001). The Office of the Narcotic s Control Board of Thailand (ONCB) once estimated that around eighty percent of the methamphetamine in the Thai market came from Myanmar (Office of the Narcoti cs Control Board 1997, 31; United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime 2003, 9) However, in 2000, there was a report that the big dealers employed new tactics by bringing only the pure methamphetamine powder from Myanmar and renting house s near Bangkok to m ake the tablet s (Treerat et al. 2000, 20) T his strategy reduced the likelihood of being arrested during transportation.


34 Actually, m ethamphetamine s ha ve long been know n to students, labor ers farmers, prostitutes and truck drivers. Its effect is consonant with the working lifestyle of many Thai people especially of those in the rural area Rural people have been familiar with th e similar effects of other substances such as high-caffeine drink s and pain killing pills when working in the fields (Phongpaichit 2003; Pongpaich it et al. 1998) The overuse of these caffeine substances has an effect like that of methamphetamine; it enables people to work long hours. Thus, methamphetamine was positively perceived originally. People called it the diligence pill, h orse drug or speed pill (ya kha yan or ya maa in Thai) Of the total 257, 965 methamphetamine addicts in 1993, according to the Thailand Development Research Institute (1995) farmers made up the largest proportion at 65.6 percent, slum dwellers counte d at 6.6. percent, while truck drivers, who are commonly believed to be the largest abusers, shared only at 5.9 per cent of all the addicts (cited in Pongpaichit et al. 1998, 101) The increase in methamphetamine use before the mid 1990s derived, in part, from the economic boom in the country. From the second half of the 1970s to the first half of the 1990s (before the Asian economic crisi s), Thailand experienced with the high gro wth of the economy with 7.6 per cent in average (Siamwalla 2000, 2) Thailand was expected to be the next NIC, the newly industrial country (Charoenloet 1991; Jansen 1991; Phongpaichit 1980) However, the economic prosperity from the industries did not reach the rural areas very much. Rather, t he decline of agricultural growth transformed many farmers in the countryside to be cheap labors in the cities (Phongpaichit and Baker 1995) According to Guest (1996), the peasants immigration to Bangkok and the cities nearby for a better life has been pervasive since the 1970s; the group that migrated most was peasants from the northeastern provinces (cited in Korinek, Entwisle and Jampaklay 2005, 785)


35 Under the changing economic conditions, methamphetamines helped low -waged laborers survive long working hours. In this stage, methamphetamine was considered as an instrument rather than as a lucrative product that could have recreational uses. Consumption was often moderate; its purpose was to achieve the most efficient result while working. According to Pongpaichit et al. (1998, 102), for example, the regular consumption among the truck dri vers was most often limited to one pill per day. Therefore, methamphetamine use before the economic crisis (in mid1997) did not pose much of a moral or social threat to the society. While these laborers got very low pay during the economic bubble, those w ith higher education found in the middle class enjoyed very high salaries (Siamwalla 2000, 24) Metha mphetamine, therefore, played no economic role (i.e. stimulant instrument) for the middle class. Af ter the economic crisis, and with the involvement of the middle class, the role of methamphetamine changed from an instrumental stimulant to a lucrative product. Since then, methamphetamine rapidly and successfully has penetrated all social classes, ages and professional, including adolescent students. Its use became more recreational. An economic recession began in 1996 and culminated in mid1997 (Lauridsen 1998; Nabi and Shi vakumar 2001). In that time, Thailand experienced a financial crisis with around 2 million people losing their jobs (Phongpaichit 2003) Between August 1997 and August 1998, the real wages were shrunk by 12 percent in some regions and up to 24 percent in others (Nabi and Shivakumar 2001, 57) The economic crisis allowed methamphetamine to play both social and economic roles. Some turned to drugs for solace, while others started drug businesses as alternative means for economic survival. Unlike other drugs, the methamphetamine market expanded very quickly through a business strategy of multilevel marketing where one enters the yaa baa [ya ba] dealing trade by moving from the role of a consumer to that of a dealer, and then


36 adva ncing to a retailer (Chouvy and Meissonnier 2004, 59) Put simply, according to Pongpaichit (2003), A seller sells to a user, encourages that user to develop his own set of customers in order to generate the income for his own consumption. T he price of h as always been much lower than that of heroin. Methamphetamine, therefore, is possible for all classes of customers. However, according to Pongpaichit et al. (1998, 10910) the pr ofitability per unit of the drug is greater in the case of ya ba than heroin. The average retail price to consumers is about twenty times the cost of producing it (107) Methamphetamine is introduced to people, especially the adolescents, as a cheap drug for recreational purposes. With cheap prices and high demand, ya ba provides an opportunity for users, including the youths, to affo rd their own consumption by, at the same time, playing role s of drug pushers or retail dealers. Methamphetamine (ya ba) is commonly found to be part of the social activities of the adolescents (Sattah, Supawitkul, Dondero et al. 2002; Sherman, Sutcliffe, German et al. 2009; Verachai, Patarakorn, Dechongkit et al. 2001) There is a report that drug dealers made hart -shaped pills to attract their youth customers ( Bangkok Post, December 22, 2001). Unlike other drugs such as heroin, methamphetamine is really used for social relatio ns, as Chouvy and Meissonnier (2004, 86) put it: Instead, methamphetamine paves the way for users to be further socialized into their peer community. Injecting heroin, an act often done on ones own, reveals personal and social tensions within an addict; using methampheta mine is the result of youthful curiosity combined with peer group persuasion, and taking it is generally done for fun. Thus, the governments early prevention efforts aimed to reach out to a wider audience than it would have for people having problems with other drugs. In 1997, the government tried to reduce the demand side of drug problems. One strategy was to create negative attitude against drugs in the public (Office of the Narcotics Control Board 1997, 9) The government tried to


37 convince the whole natio n that combating drugs is a responsibility for all Thai people (Office of the Narcotics Control Board 2001, 12) As with other efforts at criminalization found elsewhere (see Hagan 1980), t he media played an important role. As in other examples, (see Hollinger and Lanza -Kaduce 1988) the media helped to create a sense of threat. Ya ba abusers were portrayed in the media as dangerous criminals who are always mad; they craved hurting or killing others, especially children and women. Methamphetamine became known as the mad drug instead of the diligence pill. One slogan publicly seen and heard often was : one would be dea d [by using/abusing it], while the dealers would be jailed [by trading it]. In fact, Sribanditmongkol, Chokjamsai, and Thampitak (2000) indicate that death due to methamphetamine toxicity is rare. Despite the government and media campaign, t hese labeling efforts failed because people retained positive attitude s ; methamphetamine was not viewed as addictive bu t as a useful drug for working, studying and entertaining (Office of the Narcotics Control Board 1997; Pongpaichit et al. 1998, 1005) The labeling did not succee d also because, unlike heroin, ya ba use was not limited to the marginalized sections of society ; but it penetrated all socioeconomic classes (Chouvy and Meissonnier 2004, 25) While the abuse of other drugs such as heroin and cocaine was large ly confined to particular social groups (e.g. the poor, artists and celebrities) ya ba transcend ed all segments of the society. All ages, education levels, occupations, and socioeconomic classes were reported to have experience with ya ba, but their uses we re for different purposes (Chouvy and Meissonnier 2004, 667) For example, i n 1999, according to T he Nation (March 10 a, 2001) Thailands National Primary Education Commission indicat ed more than 666, 000 cases of drugrelated offense s (users, pushers, or addicts) committed by students. Of this, the offenders of more


38 than 80, 000 cases were primary school children and in numerous cases, students s old ya ba pills to their classmates in order to pay for their own habit (T he Nation March 10a 2001) The government acknowledged that, in 2001, about 90 percent of the addicts wer e youths (The Nation, August 22, 2001). In 2002, the Office of the Narcotics Control Board (ONCB) reported that 1 81, 377 offenders were arrested with 95, 908, 438 methamphetamine tablets (8,631.76 Kilograms) (Office of the Narcotics Control Board 2006, 68) However, the government estimated that around 800 million tablets were smuggled into the country each year, more than enough to be consumed by every man, woman and child in the country given its population ( The Nation, March 10 b 2001; August 22, 2001). The I nternational Narcotics Control Board (INCB), a monitoring body for the United Nations international drug control conventions, also reported that, in Thailand about 3 million people, or about 5 percent of the population, regularly abuse methamphetamine, which would make that country the worlds largest per capita consumer of the substance (International Narcotic Control Board 2002, 15; Office of the Narcotics Control Board 2003b) Some reports claimed that methamphetamines in Thailand play ed a s imilar role as opiates in Europe or cocaine in the Americas (United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime 2002, 260) The data established a record of meth amph etamine use in Thailand that demanded an official reaction of some kind. Indeed, the Thai war on drugs in 2003 can be seen as part of the international effort to combat drugs since methamphetamine was really a global phenomenon (see Dupont 1999; Grau 2007; Jelsma 2005) The International Narcotic s Control Board (INCB) and the U.S. government often urged Thailand and other developing countries to eliminate the supply of drugs (e.g., opium, heroine, cannabis and now methamphetamine). The inte rnational community often has focused on the supply side of the problem. The U.S. government has used its economic


39 power to manipulate the cooperation from these countries for the benefit of the U.S. in combating drug supply, far away from home. In additio n, the strategic approaches of the INCB rarely deal with the demand reduction as the subject of an international agreement. Therefore, countries like the U.S., the main markets of the drug trades, have no international responsibility to reduce consumer dem and. Demand reduction is rather treated by the INCB as a domestic matter (Fazey 2003, 157) According to its website ( a key function of the International Narcotics Control Board as regards the illicit manufacture of, trafficking in and use of drugs is to identify weaknesses in national and in ternational control systems and to contribute to correcting such situations. Thailand has been identified as one of the major illicit drug producing and transiting countries For example, On February 29, 2000, former President Clinton submitted to Cong ress his annual list of major illicit drug producing and transiting countries eligible to receive U.S. foreign aid and other economic and trade benefits. Certified as fully cooperating and deserving of U.S. assistance are Bahamas, Bolivia, Brazil, China, C olombia Dominican Republic, Ecuador, Guatemala, Hong Kong, India, Jamaica, Laos, Mexico, Panama, Peru, Taiwan, Thailand, Venezuela, and Vietnam (Perl 2001, 13 emphasis added) There is irony that international pressure may have contributed to Thailands efforts to control the supply of drugs through i ntensive law enforcement, even as those efforts may have led to human rights abuses that eventually engendered a very different international reaction. The initial international response, at least that from the INCB, was timid. In May 2004, representatives of the INCB visited Thailand to gather information about the war on drugs in 2003, criticized by both domestic and international human rights professionals for grave human rights violations. Rather than seriously examining the issue of law enforcement and the abuses of


40 power occurring during the drug war, the INCB navely accepted the Thai governments promises to investigate the murder cases of kha tad ton. The killings and other violence during the war were simply unintended consequences of the Thai gove rnments good efforts to combat drugs, which the INCB appreciated without asking hard questions about accountability for mass murders and other abuses during the war on drugs. Consider the INCBs own words. The mission received detailed information from th e Government regarding special committees establis hed to investigate those cases and was informed that certain cases had already b een the subject of judicial procedures. In addition, the mission was informed that criminal proceedings had been initiated aga inst a significant number of government officials accused of corruption. The Board appreciates those efforts and trusts that the Government will continue to provide information to it regarding the progress of those investigations The Board was also inform ed that, s ubsequent to the war on drugs, the problem of methamphetamine abuse had been reduced. The Board received detailed information on the treatment of drug addicts in Thailand. The Board notes the efforts of the Government and urges it to undertake sustainable measures to address the drug abuse problem in Thailand. (International Narcotics Control Board 2004, 59 emphasis added) Even for parts of the international community, drug control took precedent. That mindset was already prominent in Thai society. The Thai government, long before Thaksin has set the stage to pursue a war on drugs. To combat the threat, the Thai government h as already adjusted narcotics law s by increasing the punishment of methamphetamine offenders setting it at the same level as that for heroin offenders (Office of the Narcotics Control Board 1998, 17) In legal terms, ya ba is not a psychological substance under the Psychotropic Substances Act B.E. 2518 (1975) but is classified in the narcotic category I, a dangerous narcotic, under the Narcotic s Act B.E. 2522 (1979) and the Notification of the Ministry of Public Health No. 135 B.E. 2539 (1996) (speci fying the names and the categories of narcotics). In section 7 of the Narcotic s Act B.E. 2522 (1979) narcotics category I consists of dangerous narcotics such as heroin. The highest penalty for committing offenses related to psychological substances i s twenty years in


41 imprisonment (section 89 of Psychotropic Substances Act B.E. 2518 (1975)). The d eath penalty, however, can be applied to those who produce, import, or export the narcotic category I for the purpose of disposal (section 65 of the Narcoti c s Act B.E. 2522 (1979)). Because of the growing acceptance of the severity of the drug problem, the criminal c ourt had not hesitated to apply capital punishment to drug traffick ers. One judge from the criminal c ourt frankly told T he Nation (July 27, 2001) that the c ourt itself had declared war against drug traffickers (before Thaksins war on drugs in 2003) For example, in 2000s first eight months alone, 34 traffickers were sentenced to death ( The Nation October 3 2000). The evidence suggests that b efo re the 2003 war on drugs officially began in February, punitive attitude s against drug dealers had already infiltrated the important political, legal and social institutes. Death was already an accepted punishment for those in the drug trade; Thailand was ready for governments deadly 2003 war against drug dealers! The War on Drugs On January 14 2003, Prime Minister Thaksin Shinnawatra delivered his anti -drug policy to chiefs of various divisions and high ranking state officers including provincial governors, police chiefs and military personnel at Suan Dusit Rajabhat University Hall. He urged the state authorities to apply an area approach in which every square inch of the country would be unturned looking for drug dealers; the officials were to keep communities free of drugs at all cost (National Command Centre for Combating Dru gs 2004, 2) From the beginning, he urged the state authorities to seek the forfeit ure of properties of those who were suspiciously too wealth y compared with their normal status H e told the state authorities that casualties of drug dealers were normal phenomena of waging war (5). In his words, I am giving state officials three months to get rid of all (illicit) drugs from every square inch of the country ( Bangkok Post Jan 19, 2003).


42 His anti drug policy would also, he promised, re -enforce prevention and rehabilitation programs. Drug users would be treated as patient s with, in the Premiers words, a velvet glove, while drug dealers would be punched with an iron fist without mercy (National Command Centre for Combating Drugs 2004, 4) The Prime Minister who was once a police officer, consciously encouraged the state authorities by quoting the 1950s police chief, General Phao Siriyanon: there is nothing under the sun that the Thai police cannot do (National Command Centre for Combating Drugs 2004, 4) In his infamous time, General Phao Siriyanon was supplied by the CIA with modern and powerful weaponry and hardware for an anti -communist campaign within T hailand and neighboring countries. Especially, the CIA expected General Phao to assist the Kuomintang (KMT), the remnants of the Chinese government defeated and pushed southwards into the northern area of Burma (or Myanmar) by Maos revolutionary army in l ate 1949 (McCoy 1972, 127) The KMT drew its main financial source from producing opium (Bamrungsuk 1999, Ch 5; Fineman 1993, Part III) General Phao became the most powerful figure in the country securing his financial base by joining the opium trade with the KMT and by engaging in mafia types of ac tivities. C.L. Sulzberg er of The New York Times called him a superlative crook, while one respected Thai diplomat identified him as the worst man in the whole history of modern Thailand (McCoy 1972, 140) McCoy (1972, 140) also portrayed General Phao Siriyanons involvement with drug trade as being a role model for corrupted police rather than an innocent hero By 1955 Phao s Na tional Police Force had bec ome the larg est opium trafficking syndicate in Thailand, and was intimately involved in every phase of the narcotics traffic; the level of corruption was remarkable even by Thai standards. If the smuggled opium was destined for export, police border guards escorted the K MT caravans from the Thailand -Burma border to police warehouses in Chiang Mai. From there police guards brought it to Bangkok by t rain or police aircraft. Then, it was loaded onto civilian coastal vessels and


43 escorted by the maritime police to a mid ocean rendezvous with freighters bound for Singapore or Hong Kong. However, if the opium was needed for the government Opium Monopoly, theatrical considerations came to the fore, with police border patrols sta ging elaborate shoot outs with the K MT smugglers near the Burma Thailand frontier. Invariably the KMT guerrillas would drop the opium and flee, while the police heroes brought the opium to Bangkok and collected a reward worth one eighth the retail value. The opium subsequently disappeared. Pha o himself delighted in posing as the leader in the crusade against opium smuggling, and often made hurried, dramatic departures to the northern frontier, where he personally led his men in these desperate gun battles with the ruthless smugglers of slow dea th At a meeting with the high ranking state officials on January 14 2003, former Prime Minister Thaksin also declared that From 9 am of February 1 to 9 pm of April 30, we will take every action we can to fight illic it drugs (The Nation, January 17, 2003). A fter this deadline, the inefficient governors and police chiefs would lose their jobs as punishment (Bangkok Post January 19, 2003). As g enerally understood, this war was waged mainly against ya ba (methamphetamine) because the government conside red it to be a threat to national security. Note that from May to December 2, 2003, the war on drugs was still declared but in only a follow up action. The latter phase of war (May to December 2003) was not as intensive as the first three month s of the war on drugs (February to April 2003) Thus, when talking about Thaksins war on drugs, people generally understood that it is the war waged from February to April 2003. Before the war on drugs was officially declared on February 1, 2003, high -ranking state o fficials often conveyed to their subordinates and the public that lethal measures would be appropriate to use against drug dealers Interior Minister Wan Muhamad Nor Matha passed on messages to his subordinates, all provincial and district chiefs around th e country, to make sure that they made drug dealers in their areas realize th e core point of waging this war Tell them to stop selling drugs and leave the communities for good or they will be put behind bars or even vanish without a trace ( Bangkok Post January 25, 2003 emphasis added). The war on drugs


44 like anti -communist operations was domestic warfare with the police deployed as the main crusaders. Recognizing his duty, one police regional c ommander bragged that that more than 10,000 anti -drug volu nteers backed a plan to shorten the lives of drug traders He also gave a cold remark that A normal person lives for 80 years. But a bad pe rson should not live that long (Bangkok Post January 25, 2003 emphasis added ). Police around the country, therefore, prepared for the battle. For instance, the Pratunam Chulalongkorn Police Station in Pathum Thani Province put a big advertising board at its station: Only death [deserved] for drug trading ( Matichon, January 19, B.E. 2546 (2003)). The Phang Khon Poli ce Station in Sakon Nakhon Province also laid down a coffin at its front office, ajar with a message inside, Welcome drug dealer ( Matichon, February 1a, B.E. 2546 (2003) ). Moreover, the Police Superintendent of Khok Samrong Police Station in Lop Buri Pro vince ordered his subordinates to attach two types of notice to 17 houses suspected of dealing drugs in his jurisdiction and to explode a firecracker in front of those houses to shame them publicly ( Matichon, February 1 b B.E. 2 546 (2003) ). One notice bore warning messages, Do not be enemy of the nat ion. Quit drug trading. Be aware to be reincarnated. The other blam ed the houses owners with the messages, This house [owner] traffics drugs, betrayal to the nation, [and] the enemy of the nation. Help them to be reincarnated. On the morning of January 31, 2003, Prime Minister Thaksin presided over the ceremony to declare officially the war on drugs in front of around 24,000 people. He appointed himself the commanding general to annihilate drugs from Thailand within three months, February 1 -April 30, 2003 ( Bangkok Post February 1, 2003). Similar ceremonies also took place in the provinces around the country. The Interior Minister urged state officials to work with no day off between


45 February and April 2003 t o make drug traffickers to feel that there is no place for them and their family members to hide in Thailand ( The Nation, February 1, 2003 emphasis added). Thaksin used monetary incentives so law enforcement would pursue the war. The government promised to pay the officers 3 baht for a drug tablet (0.08 U.S. dollars in that time) but not more than 1 million baht per case about ( 25, 000 U.S. dollars)2 (The Nation, February 9, 2003). Prime Minister Thaksin was confident that At 3 baht per methamphetamine tablet seized, a government official can become a millionaire by upholding the law instead of begging for kickbacks from the scum of society ( The Nation, February 2, 2003 emphasis added ). Mo reover, the government, under anti -drugs and money laundering la ws, agreed to apportion up to 40 percent of the value of seized assets to the arresting officials once a court ordered their forfeiture (The Nation, April 9 2003). It is correct to say that the war on drugs reflected busines s thinking i.e., targets, ince ntives, and timeline which Thaksin had been very familiar with before becoming Thai Prime Minister (Phongpaichit 2003) To make targets visible and the war operation measurable, on January 30, 2003, the Interior Minister had the Ministry of Interiors O rder ( N o. Mor Tor 0211.1/Wor 343 dated 30 January 2003, c oncerning the implementation of the Prime Ministers instructions ) to order regional and local authorities to supply lists of the name s of d rug dealers (the so-called blacklists) within their jurisdiction by February 3, 2003 later extended to February 13 (cited in Independent Committee for the Investigation, Study and Analysis of the Formulation and Implementation of Narcotics Suppressio n Policy 2008) Then, the Interior Minister informed the authorities to wipe out all names appeari ng on the blacklists by April 30, 2003, the end of the three -month war according to the M inistry of Interiors Order ( most urgent ) No. Mor Tor 2 The average exchange rate in 2003 was at 40 baht for a U.S. dollar.


46 0211.1/Wor 436 dated 5 February 2003, c oncerning the change and renewal of indicators or targets of the implementation (cited in Independent Committee for the Investigation, Study and Analysis of the Formulation and Implementation of Narcotics Suppression Policy 2008) Otherwise, officials in charge of that province and district would be considered inefficient and transferred to an inactive p ost (The Nation, February 1, 2003). The sources and app roaches to make the so -called blacklists were very ambiguous and little known to the public. According to The Nation (February 27, 2003) three sources of the socalled blacklists were complied by (1 ) police, (2) village headmen (Phu yai ban and Kamnan in Thai) and local administrative organizations, and (3) the Office of Narcotics Control Board. The local authorities had only two weeks to compile the lists. There were a number of cases reported in newspapers that many people did not recognize how their nam es appeared in the blacklists of drug dealers. There was a report that e ven a 91 year -old woman in Nakhon Pathom Province found her name in the blacklist as a drug dealer (Bangkok Post March 16, 2003). People often learned about it later when called by lo cal police or told by village headmen. Some were called by the local authorities to join a rehabilitation program for drug abusers with a promise of no criminal charge s They were asked to make a vow not to get involved with drugs. But when they showed up or reported to the local authorities, they were asked, or sometimes threatened, to sign on the statement that they were a trafficker or an abuser who surrendered to the officers ( The Nation, February 15, 2003). Some even received official letters threatening not to guarantee their state of safety if they did not report themselves at the assigned date (see the examples of letters in Bangkok Post February 23, 2003). These official letters were tallied as one way to make whole the government accountable in it s war on drugs.


47 The National Human Rights Commission of Thailand (NHRC) also received a lot of complaints indicating similar threatening behaviors of the state authorities (see Examination Human Rights Report No. 39/B.E. 2549 in National Human Rights Commission of Thailand 2008) For example, the authorities notified one complainant to choose either to be jailed or to be kept in a cemetery. Another was told to prepare marihuana or other illegal drugs and wait to be legally searched by the police (at home) ; otherwise, only death would be delivered to him for dis obedience. The National Human Rights Commission (NHRC) therefore, was convinced that police are lynching blacklisted suspects to meet the drastic and swift anti drug measures ordered by Prime Minister Thaksin Shinawatra ( The Nation, February 23, 2003). Amnesty International also reported that many p eople were killed on their way back home after reporting themselves to the police (Amnesty International 2003) However, police always concluded that these killings were committed by paranoid dealers killing one another. Many people who seemed to be wealt hier than their neighbors were also blacklisted or, unluckily, eventually killed. Recall T haksin used relative wealth as an indicator of drug trafficking The striking example is a young couple living in one of the very poor rural villages in Nakorn Rachas eema Province. They were shot dead. Local police easily found 17 methamphetamine tablets inside their pickup truck. The police later concluded in their investigati ng record that the couple was part of a major network of drug dealer Police, then, w ere just ified to confiscate their vehicles and to seize their bank accounts. Actually, they became rich over night because of winning the first prize in lottery but told nobody ( The Nation, May 22, 2003). In many cases, peoples names were on the blacklists simply because they had personal conflicts with influential people, police or government officials. This included lawyer s The president of the Law Society of Samut Songkram Province for instance, was blacklisted for drug


48 involvement because he used to defend t he accused drug dealers in courts (Dabhoiwala 2003, 13) A t imeline was applied to evaluate and control the operation of the war crusaders during the three -month fight. The war consisted of four phases. Each had targets that had to be achieved and demanded a percentage of the blacklists earlier submitted by each province to be removed according to the Ministry of Interior s Order No. Mor Tor 0211.1/Wor 378 dated 3 February 2003, c oncerning the identification of indicators for narcotic s preventio n and control (cited in Independent Committee for the Investigation, Study and Analysis of the Formulation and Implementation of Narcotics Suppression Policy 2008) Phase 1 required at least a 5% r eduction be achieved by Februar y 10, 2003. Phase 2 required that at least 25% reduction be achieved by February 28, 2003. By March 31, 2003, at least 50% needed to be reported (phase 3). B y 30 April 2003, all drug producers and narcotic s de alers must be eradicated (100% deletion the end of phase 4). Throughout the campaign, the government often threatened to move the provincial governors and other officials into the inactive post s as punishment for unde rperformance for each phase of the tim eline. For example, less than two weeks after the beginning of war, Prime Minister Thaksin and the Interior Minister publicly threatened to transfer governors and police chiefs of some 20 provinces out of their posts for their poor performanc e ( The Nation, February 12, 2003; February 14, 2003). In order to reduce the number of narcotic s dealers and producers whose names appeared in the lists, Ministry of Interior authorized three methods for the state authorities to count their achievement point i.e., arrest, extrajudicial execution, or death by other causes according to the Ministry of Interior s Order ( most urgent ) N o. NCCB MOI/Wor 24 dated 15 February 2003, c oncerning clarification on the methods to combat drugs of NCCB Province/Provisional district


49 and the Ministry of Interiors Order ( most urgent ) N o. NCCB MOI/Wor 78 dated 21 February 2003, s pecifying that only three methods are allowed for reducing the numbers of drug dealers and producers including arrest, extrajudicial execution or death (cited in Independent Committee for the Investigation, Study and Analysis of the Formulation and Implementation of Narcotics Suppression Policy 2008) The procedure of arrest including sear ch and detention, is ruled by the Cons titution, the Criminal Procedure Code (CPC), and other laws related to narcotics offen s es. As mentioned early in this chapter, the lawful arrest, also the lawful search and detention, requires strict procedures intende d to prevent the arbitrary use of power by the state authorities. These rules of law seemed to burden the state authorities rather than to serve them effectively in time of war. Thus, if drug dealers were not legally arrested, they were potentially targete d for death by the other two means as prescribed by the Interior Minister. The Prime Minister also affirmed that For those who are still selling drugs, the government has set two options for them, either it is prison or a temple c emetery (The Nation, Mar ch 24, 2003 emphasis added) For example, a man whose name appeared on the blacklist was shot dead in the market place, only 300 meters away from the police station after his family was searched six times by the police and found nothing illegal (The Natio n December 13, 2003 ). Police detectives did not pay much attention to look for evidence at scene, e.g., the spent cartridges, which were eventually later picked up and turned in to police by bystanders ( The Nation, December 13, 2003 ). Although extra judi cial killing finds no definition in any law, it is widely understood that it is a result of an official carrying out his duty. In general, the C riminal Procedure Code (CPC) requires a post -mortem inquest conducted by physician specialized in forensic scie nce together with the inquiry official (police) for all unnatural death s (section 148). Unnatural deaths include


50 (1) suicide; (2) Death by the act of another person; (3) Death caused by an animal; (4) Death by accident; and (5) Death from a cause not yet k nown. F or so -called extrajudicial killing s the law requires the local public prosecutor and an administrative official to participate in autopsies in addition to th e police and the physician ( paragraph 3 of section 150). Unlike other unnatural deaths, the death caused by the act of an official alleged to be an account of carrying out hi s duty needs to be also reviewed by the court The intervention of the judiciary is intended to ensure justice for the killed suspect with the most independent agent in the j ustice system. T he police who committed the so -called extrajudicial killing might bear criminal liability if his lethal force was excessive, over reaction or not proportionate to the circumstance at that time ( i.e., not in self defense) Dr. Pornthip Rojanasunand is known as doctor death because she is the most outspoken and famous forensic expert in Thailand. During the war on drugs she publicly questioned the polices decision to not summon pathologists from her agency (the Central Institute of Forensic Science) to conduct initial autopsies in drug related murders The police used to regularly ask her agency to participate in autopsies in the provinces of Nonthaburi, Nakhon Nayok, Pathum Thani, and Ayutthaya for other murders ( The Nation, February 19, 2003). S he observed that physicians from provincial or district hospitals who were called to conduct autopsies were not pathologists They did not want to have problem s with the local police. Thus, they perform ed only limited forensic checks that were not ve ry useful as criminal proof ( Bangkok Post February 17, 2003). The last way for officials to delete the blacklisted names and to achieve points with Thaksin in the war operation was to show that those blacklisted people die d by other causes, which litera lly covers everything else. While due process is still at least minimally an important black -letter law issue for extra -judicial killings and lawful arrest, it becomes irrelevant if people


51 in the blacklists died from other causes One convenient other cau se was killed by drug gangs. As the Prime Minister once expressed if drug dealers were killing each other, that cant be helped ( The Nation, February 26, 2003). Thus, it is not surprising that police often dragged th eir feet for investigating the drugrelated killings If they could attribute a death to drug gangs, they did not have to collect evidence or investigate the cases tho roughly and they could rapidly close the cases and meet their blacklist targets. There were also many reports in the newspape r s that witnesses and the relatives of the victims were often intimidated if they wanted to testify or if they asked for information about their loved one s case s For example, a father of a dead son tried to ask local police about the progress in the prob e into his sons death, which the police conveniently presumed was related to a drug rings killings The father received a threat from the police instead of information, forcing him and his wife to leave the community and hide in Bangkok (Bangkok Post De cember 11, 2003). Police could use the reason of traffickers killing each other to explain the murder cases occurring during the three months of war on drugs and to rationalize their discretion to cease investigation by putting the blame on drug dealers It also protected the top cop. Not surprisingly, when the governments final claim of victory over drugs war was publicly announced, it showed a high number of death s where the victims were executed by unknown assailants they conveniently died by other causes. In the first day of the war, February 1, 2003, four suspects were shot dead and 264 people were taken into custody according to T he Nation (February 3 2003). In that time, ABAC Poll conducted by Assumption University with 1,412 residents of Bangkok, reported that a majority,


52 84.2 percent, supported the campaign, although 65.3 percent voiced concern that corrupt law enforcers might take the chance to frame innocent people ( The Nation, February 3, 2003). The daily killings after the first day of t he war prompted the critics to raise concern s over the shoot to kill policy or ying ting in Thai (kill and throw away). However, Interior Minister Wan Mohamad Noor Matha played down those voices dismissing them as being worried too much about the live s of drug traffickers. He also accentuated the police theory saying that the traffickers themselves were killing each other to prevent police from uncovering links to them ( The Nation, February 4, 2003). Th roughout the campaign, Prime Minister Thaksin both explicitly and implicitly defended extra judicial killings as a moral necess ity in the time of war. H e once demeaned the oppositional concerns, These officers do not deal in drugs. I think its quite unusual the drug dealers [killed by the police] are getting sympathy ( Bangkok Post February 12, 2003). He held the critics in contempt by saying that I realize what I am dealing with. Dont these critics know that I have a doctorate in criminology ? How can I not know what I am doing? ( The Nation, March 4 b 2003 emphasis added ). H e also tried to convince the public about the evil nature of the drug trade and how it works. Pushers are killed if they try to quit or give information to police The governments strategy is to smoke out pushers, who will be eliminated by their own kind. I dont understand why some people are so concerned about them while neglecting to care for the future of one million children who are being lured into becoming drugusers (The Nation, March 1, 2003 emphasis added ). T he Of fice of the Narcotics Control B oa rd of Thailand has accepted for long time that the golden triangle produced around 700800 million table t s of methamphetamines per year and around 80 percent of it was made available in Thai drug market (Office of the Narcoti cs Control


53 Board 2003b, 26) The production within Thailand is, in fact peripheral. Thus, the victory over drugs acclaimed by former Prime Minister Thaksin did not tackle the real source of the problem located in Myanmar (Burma). Through simple logic, it was no benefit at all for drug producers in Myanmar to cross the border to kill Thai drug dealers. T he police theory of killings among drug dealers seems to ring hollow. Fifteen day s after the war operation started, the deaths of alleged drug dealers reac hed 397 and 4,792 suspects were arrested Of the 397 deaths, the police admitted only 15 were shot dead in their self defense or as extrajudicial killings (The Nation, February 17, 2003). A lthough the Thai people saw daily news reporting killings related t o drugs war, they still support ed the governments actions, although they did not wholeheartedly believe the police theory of kha tad -t on. The Suan Dusit Poll carried out bet ween February 15 and 23, 2003 with 8,674 people representing 846 communities nat ionwide, found 90 percent still back the move despite fear of being killed by either police or the drug mafia (The Nation, February 24, 2003 emphasis added ). There was no public outcry against the governments war on drugs. People remained silent. The s hoot -to kill policy also seemed to be supported by popular culture The Thai news reports often presented the killing events using themes supporting the governments version i.e., the corpse w as found at the scene with methamphetamine (ya ba) nearby or hi dden on the body or in the vehicle. The reports would refer to the police theory of the drug gangs silencing their potential informers. Th e media coverage seemed to reinforce the moral righteousness of the hard -line approach to execute drug dealers in any means to secure the national interest. Thaksin also successfully convinced the society through the manipulation of the mass media to impose violence on the drug dealers. In fact, he strategically and politically used the


54 mass media to portray his hero ima ge but demeaned his opponents. Knowing marketing well, he repeatedly recounted and advertised his political activities every week through his own radio program, Prime Minister talks to the people. Oftentimes, he used this radio to condemn his condemners and to justify the violence during the war on drugs. It was widely accepted that he interfered with the independence of the mass media. The report of Thai Journalist Association dubbed the year 2002 under his administration as the Year of Media Interferen ce, and the year 2003 (the year of the war on drugs) as the Year of Concerning Media (see Chongkittavorn 2003; Rananand 2007, 149). His political power also extended to minimize the role and image of NGOs in all social development matters (as evidently decried by some human rights professionals in this study ) His political influence resulted in the difficulties for human rights professionals (most were NGOs) to rise up against the war on drugs and to struggle for justice after the war. Those rising huma n rights concerns were not supported by the society ; there was little opposition to the war on drugs. Associate Professor Chaiwat Satha anan, a leading Thai political scientist warned that i n fighting drug addiction in this way, [I fear] we are becoming i ncreasingly addicted to violence [because] the government makes us believe we have tried other ways that did not work, so violence seems to be our last resort (The Nation, March 10, 2003). Thus, during the war on drugs, human rights concerns were not simply about the arbitrary use of violence but also about the public tolerance for the violence Only a few people were willing to raise these concerns during the war on drugs. At the beginning of March, a round 100 leading Thai academics in various fields fro m universities around the country agreed to sign a statement protesting the governments human rights abuses and demanding the public not accept the violence and unlawful methods waged in the war on drugs ( The Nation, March 10, 2003).


55 There was also an att empt by the United Nations to send a Special Representative of the Secretary General to Thailand after news report s had been broadcast worldwide about the high number of state authorized killings at the beginning of the war on drugs ( Bangkok Post February 12, 2003).3 However, the Thai government rejected the request. Asma Jahangir, Special Rapporteur of the United Nations Commission on Extrajudicial, Summary or Arbitrary Execution, also urged the Thai government to limit the use of lethal forces and to abi de by law when dealing with the suspects. She demanded independent investigations in each death, bu t Prime Minister Thaksin paid little attention to her demand ( Bangkok Post February 27, 2003). Amnesty Inter national and Human Rights Watch also kept an eye on the war on drugs closely and presented their reports about human rights violation s during the war They decried Thailands human rights record during the war on drugs. The Asian Human Rights Commission devoted its journal, Article 2 of June 2003 to ta lk about the three -months Thai war on drugs. The National Human Rights Commission of Thailand (which had been created by the 1997 Constitution) and other Thai human rights workers tried hard to have the government review its policy and investigate all killing cases. The National Human Rights Commission had several open letters to Prime Minister Thaksin, but got no serious response. These human rights advocates accused the government of violating national laws and of a grave violation of its international human rights obligation. Some even referred to the possibility of taking the issues of extra judicial killings and drug related murders to the International Criminal Court ( T he Nation March 3, 2003) Some of them also e quated Prime Minister Thaksins condu ct with that of the former Field Marshal Sarit Tanarat (19 591963), one of Thailands most totalitarian leaders ( The Nation, March 5, 2003). During the old days of Prime Minister Sarit Thanarat, the 3 Reports on the Thai w ar on drugs were found in foreign newspaper s such as Straits Times, The (Singapore), T he Korea Herald, Her ald Sun (Melbourne, Australia), Scotland on Sunday,, Sydney Morning Herald (Australia), T he Daily Telegraph (London).


56 constitution provided him with a power to execute anyone without judicial proof. Hundreds of people, most accused of being communists or disrupting social orders (especially arsonists), were lawfully executed at the scene if Prime Minister Sarit said they were guilty. However, some human rights activists viewed that the daily drug related killings in Thaksins regime were worse because the killings could happen at any time, place, and to anyone who simply had his name on the governments blacklists, and the killings were excused because they were blamed on drug g angs and unidentified gunmen. Among these active human rights workers was Pradit Charoenthaitawee He was a National Human Rights Commissioner, who received several threat ening phone calls and sometimes was stalked by strangers in jungle fatigues after he likened the Prime Minister to the former Field Marshal Sarit Tanarat He also present ed information on the unlawful killings at the United Nations conference on human rights in Pakistan in February 2003 (The Nation, March 7, 2003). Prime M inister Thaksin denounced him as a whistle -blower who would give away Thailands independence ; Thaksin called Pradits behavior sickening (Bangkok Post March 6, 2003; March 11, 2003). T he Deputy Chief of the Internal Security Operations Command even labeled Pradit C haroenthaithawee as an ally of drug traders (Bangkok Post March 11, 2003 emphasis added ). By the end of April, also the end of the first three -month war on drugs, according to Bangkok Post (May 1, 2003), the government announced, that a total of 1, 765 bi g -time drug traders and 15, 244 small dealers were arrested. A total of 280, 207 pushers and addicts surrendered and were sent for rehabilitation Some 15.5 million methamphetamine tablets were seized (Bangkok Post May 1, 2003). A total of 2, 274 people w ere killed by the end of April, but only 42 died by police ac ting in self defense (Bangkok Post May 1, 2003).


57 After the three -month war on drugs (May to December 2003) the government turned to new targets such as hired gunmen, human traffickers and contr aband smugglers to cut the vicious c ycle of drug trade in the country and planned to declare the absolute victory of the war on December 2, 2003 (Bangkok Post May 1, 2003). The number of extra judicial executions or deaths due to other causes (e.g., killi ngs among the drug rings ) rarely happened after April 30, 2003. The drug related killings corresponded to government actions and were seemingly controll able by the government. As observed by Pongpaichit (2003, 4) The killings started right on cue on February 1st They ended e qually abruptly when the government backed away from this policy [after April 30, 2003]. The Independent Committee for the Investigation, Study and Analysis of the Formulation and Implementation of Narcotic s S uppression Policy (2008, 16) als o confirmed this pa ttern by comparing the period of two years before and after the 2003 war on drugs, it was found that during February -April of the year 20012002 and 20042005, the average number of murder cases was 454 per month But during the intensive campaign to combat narcotics from February April 2003, the average number of murder cases reached 853 cases per month an incr ease of 87.89 percent per month. In December 2003 when the government declared absolute victory over the war according to Ban gkok Post (December 2, 2003) the Interior Minister declared that a total of 82, 247 villages were free from drugs (100% achievement of the set target). A total of 327, 224 drug addicts, 48% higher than the set target of 220, 937, reported themselves for re habilitation. For drug producers and traders, 52, 347 were arrested, slightly above the target of 51, 516. Legal action was also pursued against 1, 257 state officials suspected of being involved with drugs. Moreover, the Narcotics Control Board and Anti M oney Laundering Board seized assets from suspected drug d ealers and producers worth 1.79 billion baht ( 44.78 million U.S. dollars in that time) from


58 Feb ruary 1 to April 30 (Bangkok Post December 2, 2003). The Prime Minister presented 112 awards to outstan ding agencies and officials for the successful war on drugs (Bangkok Post December 2, 2003). On December 2, 2003, Prime Minister officially declared vi ctory over drugs saying that, W e are now in a position to declare that drugs, which formerly were a big danger to our nation, can no longer hurt us ( Bangkok Post December 2 2003). It is true that seizure of methamphetamine have quantitatively decreased after the war on drugs However, the quality of the war is like a rock pressing grasses. Grasses do no t die out but wait for time to grow up again that is, when the rock is lifted off. The drug problems especially ya ba recently have gradually re covered their former place in the society as seen in Table 2 2 Table 2 2. The number of cases, offenders and amount of methamphetamine arrested in 20032007 Year No. of Cases No. of Offenders Seized Drugs (Tablets) 2003 ( w ar on drugs) 63, 593 68, 063 71, 526, 124 2004 34, 900 38, 778 31, 263, 517 2005 50, 671 56, 111 17, 786, 091 2006 59, 272 65, 378 13, 849 816 2007 75, 552 82, 016 14, 347, 156 Source : The Office of the Narcotic s Control Board of Thailand ( Report on Narcotics Suppression of the C ountry B.E. 2550) N ext I review the relevant literature to identify theoretical concepts or framework s to he lp understand the social practice of human rights in the domestic Thai legal settings, which have been dominated by a strong authoritarian legal culture.


59 CHAPTER 3 LITERATURE REVIEW Introduction After the end of the Second World War, the dawn of internat ional human rights law at the Nuremberg Trial s manifested a distinctive break with traditio nal norms of state sovereignty. Before 1945, international law addressed violations of individual rights by a state only in cases of injury to aliens and violation of humanitarian law or laws and customs of war; it did not cover atrocities against the states own citizens (Bantekas, Mackarel and Nash 2001, 74) However, this changed when the nature and extent of the Holocaust became widely known and viewed as threatening the interna tional peace (Lauren 2004, 25; Steiner and Alston 2000, 113) Thus, crimes against humanity were invented. Individuals could b e responsible for international human rights crimes (Steiner and Alston 2000, 114) It is generally accepted that human rights became truly internationalized when international law embra ced human rights standards establish ed by the United Nations (UN) rather than as a result of actions taken by war victors like occurred in the Nuremberg Trial (Buergenthal 1997, 703) In a sense human rights were internationalized and international law was humanized. The internationalization implies that human rights violations within the state provide jurisdiction that is no t constrained by state sovereignty. It is the interest of the international community to establish human rights standards and pursue violations of those standards. The humanization of international law posits a concern for humanity (and human rights) as a fundamental principle of international relations. A lthough the United Nations Charter provides only a few provisions addressing human rights ,4 it implicitly and explicitly authorizes the contemporary human rights movement around 4 Human rights princi ple s are addressed in the second paragraph of Preamble, Ar ticle 13(1)(b), 55, 56, 62 (8), and 68.


60 the worl d (Steiner and Alston 2000, 138) t he 1948 Universal Declaration of Human Rights (UDHR) was later declared to be a fundamental principle for the international community. However, the political atmospher e during the Cold War blunted the development of specific issues and protections within human rights treaties. The two principal treaties the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR) and the International Covenant on Economic, Social an d Cultural Rights (ICESCR) were approved only in 1966. They waited another decade to enter into force. The UDHR and these two covenants are often called the bill of rights Together they served as a springboard for developing other important multilateral human rights treaties.5 After the Nuremberg Trials were dissolved, no international tribunals with jurisdiction to make individuals accountable for international crimes existed until the establishment, under Chapter VII of the UN Charter, by the UN Securi ty Council of the I nternational Tribunals for the F ormer Yugoslavia (ICTY in 1993) and for Rwanda (ICTR in 1994) (Buergenthal 1997, 719) In the case of former Yugoslavia, widespread and gross human rights violations deriving from the armed conflicts between Serbian groups and other ethnic groups were reported beginning in 1991. They were seen as a threat to international peace (Bantekas et al. 2001, 83) In 1994, although the atrocities in Rwanda did not have any intentional elements of armed conflict between the Hutu government and the Rwandan Patriotic Front (RPF), the Security Council recognized that a well -planned campaign of genocide had taken place (Bantekas et al. 2001, 91) 5For example, the 1951 Convention of the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide; The 1969 International Convention on the Elimination of all Forms of Racial Discrimination; The 1981 Convention on the Elimination of all Forms of Discrimination against Women; The 1987 Convention against Torture and other Cruel, Inhuman or De grading Treatment or Punishment; and The 1990 Convention on the Rights of the Chi ld.


61 As a matter of development of human rights, crimes against humanity in Article 5 of the ICTYs Statute dealing with Yugoslavia extended Nurembergs legacy. Crimes agai nst humanity could be committed, not only in international but also, internal armed conflicts. Crimes against humanity were even more developed in the ICTR that dealt with Rwanda. A nexus between human rights violations and an armed conflict was not required anymore. As a result, for something to be a crime against humanity within the jurisdiction of the I CTR, it needs only to be part of a widespread or systematic attack against any civilian population on national, political, ethnic, racial or religious grounds (Article 3 of the ICTRs Statute) .6 A r ecent important development of international human right s law is the establishment of International Criminal Court (ICC) in 2002. A significant difference between the ICC and other previous Tribunals is that it was not imposed by the vict ors like the Nurem berg Tribunal or by mandate of the Security C ouncil ( i.e ., ICTY for former Yugoslavia and ICT R for Rwanda ). Rather it was developed through multi -negotiations involving 160 states (Robinson 1999, 43) The main jurisdictions of the ICC include gen ocide, war crimes, crimes of aggression, and crimes against humanity. For crimes against humanity, like those defined in the ICTR (Rwanda), the nexus to armed conflicts is not required. Unlike the ICTR (Rwanda), the ICC does not consider ethnic and politic al grounds as a necessary part of a widespread or systematic attack directed aga inst any civilian population. While the ICTY (former Yugoslavia) and ICTR (Rwanda) supersede local judicial authorities, the ICC is complementary. This implies that the case would be brought before the ICC after the government failed to pursue the case or prosecuted it with a bad faith. Roth (1998) notes that T he complementar y principle also reflects the widely shared view that systems of national justice should remain the fr ont line defense 6 The International Tribunal for Rwanda shall have the power to prosecute persons responsible for the following crimes when committed as part of a widespread or systematic attack against any civilian population on national, political, ethnic, racial or religious grounds


62 against serious human rights abuse, with the ICC serving only as a backstop (cited in Steiner and Alston 2000, 1195) The growth of interna tional human rights law, despite its flaws, argues Lauren (2004, 27) ha s provided the foundation for a new order in international criminal law and marked a profound turning point in transforming a culture of impunity into a culture of accountability. However, the world still witnesses grave human rights abuses committed with impunity. Hajjar (2004, 594) argues that the availability of human rights was contingent on the willingness of individual state to behave and conform (emphasis in original). In practice, the state is not the only mechanism of enforcement. Nongovernment organizations (NGOs) and people around the world come to get involved with human rights in some ways. This reminds us to think about the effect and the presence in addition to the effectiveness of transnational human rights law at the social practice. In the next section, I examine the concept of legality as developed in law and society research to understand the effect and the presence of human rights in the lived experiences of people. Legal Consciousness In general, the study of l egal co nsciousness examines the role of law in everyday life at common locations like workplaces, schools, and neighborhoods (Marshall and Barclay 2003, 621) Engel (1998, 111) suggests that T he attraction of consciousness as a research topic resides precisely in the commonalities that are seen by researchers to typify the ways groups of people or entire culture approach, use and think about law. La w is understood as an internal feature of society. It is not simply the external force acting upon the society. The study of legal consciousness shifts the theoretical paradigm of discovering the causal relationship between law and society, toward tracing the presence of law in society (Ewick and Silbey 1998, 35) Law, as suggested by McCann and March (1995, 210) is less as discrete rules and official decisions


63 than as various modes of knowledge as specific cultural conventions, logics, rituals, symbols, skills, practices, and processes that citizens routinely deploy in practical activity. Again, according to Ewick and Silbey s The Common Plac e of Law (1998, 39) C onsciousness is understood to be part of a reciprocal process in which the meanings given by individuals to their world become patterned, stabilized, and objectified. These meanings, once institutionalized, become part of the material and discursive systems that limit and constrain future meaning making. They name the above structural feature as legality, which refers to the meanings, sources of authority, and cultural practices that are common ly recognized as legal, regardless of who employs them or for what end (22). In this sense, the study of legal consciousness is to understand how legality is experienced and understood by ordinary people as they engage, avoid, or resist the law and legal meanings (35 emphasis added). Put simply, legal consciousness is a participation in the process of constructing legality through the interplay between meanings (embedded in social structure) and action (practiced by individual). Legal consciousness engages in both human action and social constrain t Consequently, consciousness is not an exclusively ideational, abstract, or decontextualized set of attitudes toward and about the law.Legal consciousness is produced and revealed in what people do as well as what they say (46 emphasis in original ). Thus, Engel (1998, 119) asserts that a process in which understandings of the world interact with experiences in the world makes legal consciousness continually transformable. By using in depth interview s Ewick and Silbey (1998, 26) asked the respondents a series of open-ended questions about a wide rage of events and practices that might have troubled or bothered them at some point and then the narratives from the respondents were interpreted to find how legality is constructed. They found that individuals can participate to construct legality


64 through three forms of legal consciousness before the law, with the law and against the law Legal consciousness of before the law depicts law as a separate sphere from society. It is objective, distinct, formally ordered and rational. People who conceptualize law in this way tell the laws own story of its own awesome grandeur, but sometimes people express frustrationabout what they perceive as their own powerless (47 emphasis in original). For w ith the law legal consciousness, on the other hand, law is understood as a game, where the pursuit of self interest is expected and the skillful and resourceful can make strategic gains (514). The third type of legal consciousness, against the law, portrays law as something to be avoided and dangerous to invoke (514 emphasis in original). These three types of legal consciousness are not mutually exclusive. Individuals can experience and talk about all three withi n a one story. In Ewick and Silbeys words (1998, 50) legal consciousness is neither fixed nor necessarily consistent; rather it is plural and variable across contexts, and it often expresses and contains contradictio n. This contradiction is not problematic at all because consciousness entails both thinking and doing, the complexities and contradictions within legal consciousness are what make legality a type of social practice and therefore a producer of social structures (224 5 emphasis in original). Ewick and Silbeys work (1998) inspires many scholars in law and society to study legal consciousness in more specific areas of law and specific groups of people; for example, e xperiences and atti tudes of ordinary citizens about law and street harassment (Nielsen 2000) sexual harassment at a privat e university (Marshall 2003) same -sex marriage (Hull 2003) different disputing behaviors at two similar taxicab companies (Hoffmann 2003) the role of law for educational activists (Kostiner 2003) and even lesbian and gay rights (Harding 2006) These


65 studies often found that a legal framework or law like procedure competes with other social frameworks to shape individuals legal consciousness. Moreover, legal consciousness is revealed not only through the presence of law but also its absence For example, Neilson (2000) found that most ordinary people have some experiences with offensive speech on the street and they accept that this speech poses serious social problems. However, they oppose the legal regulation of offensive public speech except in its most extreme forms. Gender and race influence how people justify their legal consciousness against regulation. For instance, the white males disfavor legal intervention because of holding First Amendment values, while women do not want to be labeled as a victim. The contemporary studies of legal consciousness often follow the suggestion of Kearns and Sarat (1993, 55) to abandon the law -first perspective and [scholarship on law in everyday life] should proceed, paradoxically, with its eye not on law, but on events or prac tices that seem on the face of things, removed from law, or at least not dominated by law from the outset. However, when laws are too decentered, the distinction between laws also drifts off and is vague. Thus, the contemporary studies rarely appreciate h ow peoples legal consciousness is exposed differently or similarly toward two or more different areas of law. Engel (1998, 140) suggest ed almost a decade ago that D ifferent substantive areas of law are associated with different perceptions, understandings, and behaviors and must therefore be distinguished in research on legal consciousness. In his own study, although he does not use the words, legal consciousness, Engel (1984) sti ll examin es the different perceptions and behaviors of local people in Sander County toward two different areas of legal claims personal injury (tort) and breaches of contract. These two areas of law deal with losses or sufferings caused by the conduct of the o ther. They are both


66 legitimate in the formal legal sense, but breaches of contract are more accepted in social practice (Engel 1984, 575) On the one hand, the claim based on personal in jury (tort) is perceived by the local people as very greedy, quick to sue, people looking for the easy buck, and as those who just naturally sue and try to get something [for]lifes little accidents (553 emphasis in original). On the other hand, the claim based on breaches of contract is more accepted. People do not see contract plaintiffs as greedy or sue happy or looking for the easy buck (575 emphasis in original). Engel (1984) found that newcomers brought to the community the conceptions of injuries, rights, and obligation. In the meantime, the local residents viewed their society as traditionally based on interdependencies and reciprocal exchanges among fellow residents, which are also an element of a social contract (575). Tort litigation (personal injury) tends to threaten the traditional social order. The litigation on breaches of contract rather reinforces the traditional social order and mainta ins the social system of interdependent and reciprocal exchange. Consequently, individuals who suffered from personal injury often are assumed to take a disposition of self -sufficiency and personal responsibility, while those who are injured by the breac hes of contract are socially allowed to assert an aggressive demand for compensation or remedies (558). In this sense, enforcing different legal ideas make one as an insider and the other as outsider, even though they live in the same community. T his diss ertation looks at two realms of law and peoples consciousness about them. It tries to see how social actors understand and perceive the role of transnational human rights law and domestic law in the particular context of mass murder s and other abuses duri ng Thai war on drugs.


67 The Social Practice of Human Rights The classic legal realist distinction between law in the books and law in action is useful to understand how human rights law works in practice. There is often a gap between the two sometimes a wide one Rather than focusing on the effectiveness of international human rights law (which suffers from the old gap problem), this dissertation turns to its effect and presence at a national level and in local practice. Like law in general, transnationa l human rights law does not simply carry substantive principles of law, but it supplies the social actors with meanings and sources of authority to make sense of their worlds. The concept of legality and legal consciousness developed in law and society is useful to see the effect and presence of transnational human rights law. However, the effect and presence of international human rights law cannot be understood by ignoring the presence and effect of domestic legal practices, especially in modern approach e s like that of the ICC which sees the international law as being complementary to national/local efforts. As developed below, it is accepted that the idea of human rights is now deeply trans national (Merry 2006a, 2) One challenge is t o localize it at the social practice which requires the work of human rights professionals Transnational L egality It seems that a growth of international human rights instruments equips the world with a global culture of rights. However, from an anthropological point of view, Hastrup (2003a, 1617) responds that it is a peculiar culture in the sense that i t is declared rather than lived and that it is future oriented rather than based in tradition. In reality, as once observed by British Foreign Secr etary Robin Cook those who murdered one person were more likely to be brought to justice than those who plot geno cide against millions (cited in Lauren 2004, 33) Th is is still true for the contemporary world, which deals with grave human rights abuses and struggles to impose accountability. To focus only on such global indicators as the growth of human rights


68 enactments obscures the larger picture of how human rights are implemented and practiced at the local level (Halliday and Osinsky 2006, 448) Genocide might be a relatively rare event which occurs in a divided society in which one or more ethnic groups are destroyed in whole or in part during armed conflicts. Less rare are other grave human rights violations, such as crimes against humanity, which are still witnessed around the world in different forms of criminality and victimization and not always in divided societies or societies that are falling apart. The degree of abuse is not less than t hat of genocide despite the fact that they erupt in time s of peace. As seen in Article 7 of the ICC, crimes against humanity encompass a wide range of crimes committed as part of a widespread or sys tematic attack directed against any civilian population, with knowledge of the attack Political and ethnic grounds are not a necessary part of mens rea to commit crimes against humanity The unique nature of these crimes which make them distinct from ord inary crimes is that they require a widespread or systematic attack in which a structural pattern of criminality and victimization can be recognized in some ways. Ordinary criminal law often becomes mechanically blind to such a structural nature of crime s (see Quinney 1973) In this respect, domestic and transnational laws address the same problem with different frameworks. Often, the former marginalizes and replaces the latter in practice by individualizing criminality and victimization (see Wilson 2006) For legal positivists, the domestic law fits concepts of what law is more tha n does the transnational law. Domestic law represents the command of the sovereign backed by state sanctions. Still, positive domestic law may not be an effective control over structurally based large scale symptomatic crimes against humanity. Thus, if we consider only the effectiveness of international human rights instruments, their failure is obvious (see Hathaway 2002) But, despite its inefficiency, why is the human rights idea still


69 attractive for social struggles around the world? The extensive reference to human rights in the contemporary world reminds us to look at human rights law beyond its traditional conception of enforcement. Acknowledging the limits of transnational human rights law, Professor Koh (1999, 1417) o f Yale Law School reconceptualizes its enforcement. He proposes that international human rights law is enforced not just by nation -states, not just by governmental officials, not just by world historical figures, but by people with the courage and commitm ent to bring international human rights law home through a transnational legal process of interaction, interpre tation and internationalization. By this way, he decenters international human rights law by moving away from an instrumental to a constitutive idea of law That shifts the focus from effectiveness. He de -emphasizes the state but emphasizes the role of active people as an enforcement agency to localize international human rights law through a transnational legal process By a transnational lega l process, he means both the theory and practice of how public and private actors nation -states, international organizations, multinational enterprises, non -governmental organizations, and private individuals interact in a variety of public and private, domestic and intern ational for a t o make, interpret, enforce, and ultimately internalize rules of transnational law (Koh 1996, 1834) Donnelly (2006, 73) a political scientist, asserts that normative force is more important than material force for human rights. F or him, human rights are, literally, the rights that one has simply because one is a human being (Donnelly 2003, 10) Human rights are equa l, inalienable and universal. However, it seems that the normative power of human rights cannot comprehend the diverse and innovative uses of human rights at the social practice. In that level, what human rights are might be different from what human ri ghts mean to social actors who carry out the


70 idea of human rights. Therefore, to make the processual enforcement empirical, we need to see how the idea of human rights is used, approached, and even talked about in the social practice. The presence of hum an rights standards takes effect through social practicethat is how we know what constitutes human rights law. This is the study of the practice of human rights (Goodale 2007) This line of inquiry is consistent with the theoretical shift in law and society research from l aw in the books to law in action and from the effectiveness of law on the society to the effect and the presence of law in the society. Goodale (2007, 24) a legal an thropologist, suggests that A t a basic level, the practice of huma n rights describes all of the many ways in which social actors across the range talk about, advocate for, criticize, study, legally enact, vernacularize, and so on, the idea of human rights in its different forms He treats the idea of human rights as a r esource and schema for the practice of human rights. In this way, his conceptual image fits well with the concept of legality used in law and society research. Recall that Ewick and Silbey (1998, 22) define legality as a structural feature of society which refers to the meanings, sources of authority, and cultural practices that are commonly recognized as legal, regardless of who employs them or for what end. Like the idea of law in general, the idea of human rights can refer to the meanings, sources of authority and cultural practices that are commonly recognized as human rights regardless of who employs them or for what end. This is what is meant by transnational legality of human rights for this dissertation For law and society, to understand how legality is experienced and understood by ordinary people as they engage, avoid, or resist the law and legal meanings is to study their legal consciousness (Ewick and Silbey 1998, 35) Ewick a nd Silbey (1998, 39) refer to consciousness as part of a reciprocal process in which the meanings given by individuals to


71 their world become patterned, stabilized, and objectified. These meanings or legality, once inst itu tionalized, become part of the material and discursive systems that limit and constrain future meaning making. Legal consciousness is a form of participation in the process of constructing legality. Ewick and Silbey (1998, 46) point that [ L ]egal consciousness is produced and revealed in what people do as well as what they say (emphasis in original) The social practice by talking about, advocating for, criticizing, studying, legally enacting, vernacularizing and s o on, the idea of human rights is, actually, a participation in constructing transnational legality of human rights which might be perceived by the social actors in different forms and even in contradictory ways. In Goodale s (2007, 26) words, the practice of human rights is characterized by contradictions, uncertainties, and a kind of normative incompleteness, these should not be taken to represent a failure of universal human rights as a coherent legal or ethical framework, or, on a mo re practical level, a failure by different institutions to properly translate the idea of human rights in context [since the legitimacy of human rights practices] does not depend on assumptions or aspirations of universality. To understand the practice of human rights the many ways in which social actors across the range talk about, advocate for, criticize, study, legally enact, vernacularize, and so on, the idea of human rights in its different forms is to study social actors consciousness of human rig hts collectively constituting transnational legality of human rights in their world of social practice. The Implication of Transnational L egality Some s cholars counter the claim that the growth of international human rights law erodes the sovereignty of the state. Actually the states sovereignty is rather revised as a part of the socalled modern world (Merry 2004, 582) As observed by Pureza (2005, 268) the world is in a transition from an international law pointed at guaranteeing co -existence ( how to keep them peacefully apart ) toward an international law aimed at being an active instrument of cooperation


72 (how t o bring them actively together ) (emphasis in original). The state still plays a central role in new international order, especially through its auton omy of using law within its jurisdiction. This is our concern to implement transnational legality of human rights. Human rights treaties often need the states duty to protect against and to prevent violations of rights. For example, Article 2 of The 1981 Convention on the Elimination of all Forms of Discrimination against Women ( CEDAW) requires the state party to respect and to ensure to all individuals within its territorythe rights recognized in the present covenant. The provision obligates the state to erecting institutional machinery, such as police force, courts, and bodies of law to guarantee the rights of individuals as provided by the Convention (Steiner and Alston 2000, 183). However, many provisions from the Convention prescribed in domestic criminal law do not make a violation an international crime, a subject of international law. It is a crime against the state that the state must punish (Merry 2006a, 180; Steiner and Alston 2000, 1136) Hajjar (2004, 594) observes that human rights obtain thei r universalizing character from the fact that people are subjects of states, and states are subjects of international law. Thus the establishment of human rights simultaneously revised and reinforced the s t ate -centrism of the international order (emphas is in original). Therefore, it is hard to imagine that the effect and the presence of transnational human rights law are comprehensible without considering the effect and the presence of the states domestic legal practices. For example, although battered women in the study of Merry (2006a) accept the framework of a human rights idea as a part of their consciousness and understand a gendered violence in human rights terms, domestic legal practices expressed through the practices of legal professionals and t he perception of people toward legal authorities and institutions determine whether such consciousness will be sustained and mobilized as a claim of


73 right. Ideally, the legalities of transnational human rights law will integrate perfectly with the states domestic legal practices. In such a perfect integration, the idea of human rights and the idea of (domestic) law become united. Human rights become a structural feature of society providing the meanings, sources of authority, and cultural practices to pe ople and state authorities in their social practice and communication. This is why Merry (2006a, 3) declares at the beginning of her influential book that [I]f human rights ideas are to have an impact, they need to bec ome part of the consciousness of ordinary people around the world. However, in a world that is far from perfect, the interaction between these two legalities is unpredictable. They might facilitate, compete, or even overlap with each other, depending on t he specific context and sit uation under the consideration. As a matter of positive law, domestic law and its practice are clear ly recognized as authoritative. Transnational human rights legalities are less recognized and are sometimes considered to be sof t law ( Abbott and Snidal 2000; Chinkin 1989; see also Hart 1957) Their differences lie in what meanings and resources they provide to socio legal actors (human rights advocates and legal professionals) and non legal actors (the aggrieved or affected peop le). Thus, Halliday and Osinsky (2006, 451) are correct to claim that the most important power of human rights is a definitional power to classify, interpret, and label the states practice. In the case of gendere d violence, Merry (2006a, 180) argues that human rights ideas offer a radical break from the view that violence is natural and inevitable in i ntimate relation s However, the power of domestic law also automatically es sentializes categories and fix es identities that entail a possible solution. Thus, both powers carry what Darian -Smith (2004, 548) calls the authority to legitimate a certain vision of the social order, to determine relations between persons and groups, and to manipulate cultural understandings and discourses


74 Vernacularization of Transnational Legality One challenge is to bring g lobal ideas of human rights to the local level. In this task, the role of human rights activists, both at national and local levels, as translators, is important. Human rights translators, suggested by Merry (2006a, 134) ar e [i]ntermediaries who translate global ideas into local situations and retranslate local ideas into global frameworksThey foster the gradual emergence of a local rights consciousness among grassroots people and greater awareness of n ational and local issues among global activists. Although ordinary people are also important, as objects and subjects of human rights struggle, they lack knowledge about international human rights law (134). Nevertheless, they are still important actors i n that they translate pain injuries and suffering s into human rights claim (134 ). Two approaches have been identified for translating global ideas of human rights into local and social practices: the social service approach and the human rights advocacy a pproach. The social service approach led by social workers and feminist activists, offers support services to victims and offenders (138). This approach uses a variety of strategies which include prompting criminal justice professionals to implement crimin al law seriously, improving safety for vulnerable people, educating the public about the problems, and even conducting survey research to support the social movement. The human rights advocacy approach is led by law yers and political elites (138 ). These gr oups try to incorporate international standards of human rights into national law. Unlike the social service workers, human rights advocates are associated with national and transnational elites (164). Thus, they bring forth international pressure on their own government by articulating glo bal ideas of human rights (164). These two approaches are complementary rather than contradictory. On the one hand, human rights advocates provide the standard of international human rights which social service activists can use for social service programs to advance rights at the grassroots. On the other hand, social service programs also


75 help encourage their clients to frame their grievances in terms international standards of rights. Both approaches provide meaning, ser ve as sources of authority and influence cultural practices a nd are central to constituting human rights legality. However, the rights framework does not displace the other frameworks; it adds one more layer to the larger legal framework so vulnerable peo ple can think about problems differently from their usual mode of understanding. Thus, the battered and indigenous women in Merrys (2006a) s tudy were both rights -bearers and injured kinsmen. The wo men learn that they have rights and the ir positive experiences with these rights in a legal system increase and sustain their rights consciousnesses. Negative experiences undercut a human rights consciousness. In Merrys (2006a) words (1867), [W]hen police fail to arrest, prosecutors [fail] to push a case forward, or probation officers [fail] to compel an offender to attend the battering program[and] their batterers are not punished, they see there are limitations to their rights. Consequently, they are discouraged to turn to law for help. Merry (2006a, 192) concludes that [H]uman rights are difficult for individuals to adopt as a self -definition in the absence of institutions that take these rights seriously. Implementation is fu ndamental to establishing human rights consciousness (emphasis added). Without institutions, the presence and effect of human rights law will be minimal. For the mass killings of the Thai war on drugs, the subject of this dissertation, human rights workers at both national and local levels have tried hard to mobilize around the transnational human rights idea. It is unclear now whether national human rights advocates and local activists approach the problem differently, as suggested by Merry (2006a) or what features of the social service or advocacy approaches ha ve been pursued. Some of the people whose loved one(s) were killed during the war on drugs made a complaint to the National Human


76 Rights Commission with the help and encouragement by human rights workers. However, it seems that the aggrieved turning to human rights ideas might discern the failure of ordinary legal system. In other words, because of the failure of the ordinary legal system, they might turn to global idea of human rights. This seems to b e opposite to Merrys (2006a) findings in her study of gendered violence. However, it should be noted that the uncertainties of human rights practice are not theoretically problematic since the transnational legality of human rights is constitutive and tra nsformable. As suggested by Goodale (2007, 1213) it is not of a discrete system or permanent network, but only the continually emergent collection of knowledge and practices themselves. Mass murders and human rights abuses during the Thai war on drugs provide an opportunity to study how contingent categories of meanings provided by human rights emerge and are applied to the social practices when taking the domestic legal practices into account.


77 CHAPTER 4 METHODOLOGY Introduction This study is about the roles of transnational human rights law and domestic law in the particular context of human rights abuse during the Thai war on drugs in 2003. The research d oes not concentrate on substantive principles of laws but their effect and presence in the lived experiences of people. The research is consonant with the intellectual effort in contemporary law and society examining the role of law in everyday lives which Ewick and Silbey (1998) called legality. It also contribut es to the study of human rights by situating the transnational idea of human rights within social practice. At face value, the human rights and domestic legality might present competi ng forces that shap e the legal worlds and behaviors of social actors. Leg al consciousness is the analytical tool to examine this assumption and to un tangle more nuanced relationships between them. Several insights from the preceding literature review provided guidance for how to assess the legal consciousness of respondents. F ollowing Ewick and Silbey (1998) I approached legal consciousness as a social phenomenon, contingent and revealed in what respondents do and say Legal consciousness is less concern ed with explicitly conscious attitudes but more with the subtle ways in which people use and think about law in their experi enced lives that are expressed in their conversations. Thus, in-depth interviews were most appropriate to understand how people defined, evaluated, justified and reacted to laws. Legal con sciousness is captured by asking respondents not about law directly but, for example, about a wide range of situations and social relationships that occur in peoples ordinary, daily events and transactions, [and] what they perceived as disruptions in tho se exchanges, and how they responded (Ewick and Silbey 1998, 25253) Ewick and Silbey (1998,


78 255) identified when and how legal images, metaphors, terminology, or concepts were invoked from the richness of e veryday life na rrati ve In this way, the study of legal consciousness is concerned less with what people think but more with what they think with (Kostiner 2003, 330) In this dissertation, however, l egal consciousness does depend on the importance of laws. People were asked, among the other things, about international human rights and domestic legalities in the specific context of t he war on drugs. Thus, what people think about laws would be mainly farmed through perceptions and experiences with the idea of international human rights and of domestic legal practice. T he interview is also intended to tap the respondents meaning -maki ng process to see what they think with to justify their behaviors as they pursue justice and/or claim human rights violation s during the war on drugs. Ewick and Silbey (1998, 254) a ccept that their methodologys emph asis on narrative every life stories brings about many pages of transcription, much of it about the mundane, trivial, and particularistic details of individuals lives. They admit that they were overwhelmed by the apparent meaningless of much informati on (254). Narrative stories for this dissertation therefore, are allowed to be told only if they are related to the effect and the presence of the idea of international human rights and/or domestic legal practice. To avoid being flooded out with irrelevan t narrative information, this dissertation used active interview s to search relevant narrative s more effic i ently. In addition to interview s I documented relevant archival materials from newspapers, official records and annual reports of the National Human Rights Commission of Thailand (NHRC).


79 Data Collection Active Interview Generally, the semi -structured interview begins by asking general questions so that respondents can tell their stories. Probes prepared in advance help make themes and concepts of the respondents more explicit. The interviewer is guided by the schedule and set of questions but is usually not dictated by them (Smith 1995, 12) The interviewer asks specific and different types of questions to reconstruct the subjective viewpoint of the respondents. The goal is to get implicit knowledge of individuals expressed in the form of questions and answers, ready for interpretation (Flick 2002, 8384) T he semi -structured interview assumes the respondents as a repertoire of knowledge which is excavated by the researcher. This assumption disregards, as argued by Holstein and Gubrium (1995, 2), the most fundamental of epistemological questions: Where does this knowledge come from, and how is it derived? Holstein and Gubrium (1995) suggest that the interview is, in fact, social interaction where both parties unavoidably get involved in meaning -making work. The partie s are both active agents. In their words, Meaning is not merely elicited by apt questioning nor simply transported through respondent replies; it is actively and communicatively assembled in the interview encounte r (4). They insisted that their active a pproach might therefore be most appropriatewhen the researcher is interested in subjective interpretations, or the process of interpretation more generally, even for ostensibly well defined information (73). Thus, in this research, the ordinary semi -stru ctured interview was adjusted to be more active to appreciate the respondents meaning -making process to learn about their interpretations and their legal consciousness in respect to transnational human rights and dome stic Thai legal frameworks. For Holste in and Gubrium (1995, 56) the active interview consists of both data about the subject matter of the research and data about how that subject matter is organized in respondents


80 narrative experience. The former deals with what is being volunteered and discusse d and the latter involves how the responses are interpreted ( i.e., what they think with ). The active interview is appropriate to examine the variability and contradictions of the experience under considerationin relation to the interviews interpretive circumstances (32). For example, Holstein and Gubrium (1995, 33) exemplified that respondents intersperse their responses to interview items with telltale phrases such as speaking as a mother, thinking like a woman, if I were in her shoes,wearing my professional hat,...and I havent really thought about it (emphasis in original). Challenged by the interviewer, pointed in promising directions, and at least partially aware of the interpretive terrain at hand, the respondent becomes a kind of researche r in his or her own right, consulting repertoires of experience and orientations, linking fragments into patterns, and offering theoretically coherent descriptions, accounts, and explanations (29 emphasis in origin al) Rubin and Rubin (1995, 87) also indicated that the goal for qualitative research is not to eliminate inconsistencies, but to make sure you [the researcher] understand why they occur. This methodological foundation is consistent with the theoretical construction of legality in law and society. The respondents place their legal consciousness in different roles and contexts. In this research, the interview guide is divided into three main topics. Each topic contains questions and probes to enhance both the breadt h and depth of coverage under that topic. However, in actual interview s, I did not quote exactly the questions and probes prepared. The point is not to ask all prepared questions because the respondents active answers often range d across prepared question s an d cover several issues at once. The introductory part consists of questions about demographic backgrounds of the respondents as human rights professionals and of the people who were affected by the war on drugs.


81 Then, the topic of law and social order aims to decipher what and how the respondents understood the events of justice, law, and rights violations during the war on drugs, including how law was used or not used in that time. The assumption is that these understandings might associate with how t he respondents think about and evaluate the roles of domestic legal practice in relation to the idea of international human rights. Respondents are also asked questions about their understanding and experiences with the state authorities and other legal pr ofessionals. Finally, the role of law in instigating social change is introduced. The language and idea of human rights are mainly examined in this part. The assumption is that invoking or thinking about human rights principles require the respondents to c onsider issues of justice and accountability in ways which go beyond, or even resist, the existing domestic legal formulations. Throughout the data gathering process, interviews were conducted at times and locations that were most convenient for the subje cts whenever possible for human rights professionals, the interviews were conducted at their offices, while most of the aggrieved were interviewed at their homes. I transcribed the tapes within 24 hours after the interview and destroyed the digital records immediately. The specific names of persons, places, and other information that might identify the respondents were deleted from the transcription All respondents names reported here are pseudonyms The Social Performance of Interview The active intervi ew requires collaboration between the respondent and the interviewer. Apt to the active interview is dramaturgical performance. Holstein and Grubium (1995, 17) agreed that: Its [dramaturgical metaphors] narrative is scripted in that it has a topic or topics, dis tinguishable roles, and a format for conversation. But it also has a developing plot, in which topics, roles, and format are fashioned in the give and take of the interview. This active interview is a kind of a limited improvisational performance. The pr oduction is spontaneous, yet structured focused within loose parameters provided by the interviewer


82 Therefore, throughout the interview, the respondents provided their responses in two ways. One is the responses to the direct questions ( i.e., prepared que stions or spontaneous questions). The other information is part of conversation where the que stions were not directly asked. Rubin and Rubin (1995, 146) suggest that the interview is not to ask all prepared questions and probes but to look at the emerging themes, concepts and ideas raised by respondents. This is because some interview partners are self revelatory, others more restrained and formalisticSome are well informed, and others know little on the topic (11). To encour age the respondents to talk, I did not bring the interview guide to the table. The coherent form of asking pertinent questions and of recoding answers in a sequent theme was also not appropriate. Thus, in the actual interview, although I prepared several m ain questions and probes for each topic in advance, I still allow the questions to be customized during the interview to see how respondents were talking about the ir understandings and experience s towards law. For example, I interviewed an a u nt of two orphans whose parents were shot dead during their way back home after leaving the police station for some business. Next day, the police came to search their office looking for more evidence involving drug offense s Later, all their properties, several milli on baht, were seized. Although I did not prepar e probes asking about the property forfeiture in de pth, I attentively listened to her and did not interru pt her talking about the properties. Later, I learned that nothing was left for her nephews to live thei r lives; therefore, she justifie d her need to fight for the justice to release properties from the official forfeiture. When connected to other respondents who mention ed the propert y and justice issue s her behavior pr ovides one important theme: many aggri eved people became active for rights and justice struggles because they want ed their properties back but they did not actually hold any officers accountable for the killing


83 To prevent the respondents (only the aggrieved people) from recalling a painful me mory, I notified them that I already read and knew their stories from the annual r eports of National Human Rights Commission before beginning the interview. The notice effectively help ed the interview focu s on talking of law and justice. W hile a narrative story of the killing incidents was periodically raised by the respondents to support their opinion on law and justice it d id not dominate the conversation. From the interview, it was impossible to prevent them from expressing a feeling of pain (through fa ce, words, and voices), especially female respondents who lost their loved ones because it was really a painful experience! Thus, I did not try to block off their expression but notif ied them that it was my ethical responsibility to stop the interview if t hey felt uncomfortable when talking about it However, no one chose to stop the interview. Rather, after I raised the concern, they, rather, tried to convince me about the injustice they encountered, although most of them and the killed persons really hate d drugs and supported the war. Research Setting and Samples Setting s This study t oo k place in Thailand. The interviews were conducted in Bangkok and other provinces of the N orth, the North -East, and the South of Thai land. All respondents are Thai. The inte rview s took place at their offices or homes. Samples Generally, researchers conducting a qualitative interview want to understand complex features of cultural behavior and the process that influences the behavior. Thus, respondents are not the same as each other and there is no benefit to pick them at random. Spradley (1979, 47) recommends the interviewer to find the encultured informants individuals who know the


84 culture well and take it as their responsibility to explain what it all means (cited in Rubin and Rubin 1995, 66) For this research about law and society, the encultured informants tend to be those who are competent to talk for law they are able to apply or translate law to the cases. For transnational human r i ghts law, Merry (2006a) suggests human rights professionals ( i.e., human rights lawyers and human rights workers) as the important translators. For domestic legal practice, the literature always conveys that law does not directly influ ence ordinary people. Ordinary people rarely come to get directly involved with competition over law. For example, repeat players in law often get help from legal professionals ( e.g., lawyers, police, public attorney and judges) (Galanter 1974) Legal professionals often filter the ideally expected impact of law (see Kidder 1983, Ch.6) Moreover, some scholars argue that people obey law because they feel they are treated well and in a respectful manner by the police, judges, and lawyers, rather than because they merely think that law is good and sacred (e.g., Tyler 1990) Thus, legal professionals both primarily mediate the effect of law and simultaneously pr oduce legal culture, the meanings of law available for the soci al practice. Included here were lawyers actively involved with issue of justice and rights during the war on drugs They were competent to talk for domestic legal practice (i.e., legal applicat ion) Unlike human rights and legal professionals, ordinary people seem to be enculturated (not encultured) by both laws. They seem to be less competent to talk for both laws they are less competent to apply or translate laws to th eir cases. Nevertheless, this research focused on legality (the role of law in everyday life) not a positive (written) law. Again, according to Ewick and Silbey (1998, 22) legality implies to a structural feature of society which refers to the meanings, sources of authority, and cultural practices that are commonly recognized as legal,


85 regardless of who employs them or for what end. T he concept of legality collapses the distinction between the encultured and the enculturated because they al l can talk about law. Therefore, w ithin the context of the war on drugs, the aggrieved people who had interacted with the state officers, got involved with (domestic) law, and lodged a claim to the National Human Rights Commission (NHRC), were competent t o talk about domestic legality and the idea of human rights. Samples of two groups are drawn. One is from human rights professionals ( i.e., human rights workers and human rights lawyers) and the other is from the aggrieved people who made claims to the Nat ional Human Rights Commission of Thailand. Human rights professional s : All interviews took place at their offices during or after office hours. My rapport with a few national human rights professionals and some officers from the Office of the National Huma n Rights Commission made the snowball selection possible I contacted and began my interview with the first three most active human rights professionals during the war on drugs. I got their names from newspaper accounts They became my gate keepers helping me identify other human rights professionals ( e.g., human rights workers and human rights lawyers) who, as known a mong their networks, became involved with law and justice is sue s of the war on drugs in some ways. The snowball technique was used to create a social network for the interview s of human rights professionals. To i nterview the respondents who were named and recommended along this network also increased the ir willingness to talk (Rubin and Rubin 1995, 67-68) N ote that although ther e are many NGOs and lawyers who work in human rights issues in Thailand, the number actively involved with law and justice issues related to the war on drugs was lower than expected Pa iwan a well known human rights lawyer who joined the National Human Ri ghts


86 Commission (NHRC) to investigate human rights violation during the war on drugs, shed light on the challenge. Consider the following comment for his reason. Interviewer: [M]y research strategy is to interview human rights professionals at both nationa l and local [ and regional] levels. D o you have someone to recommend to me? They might be NGOs, for example. Pa iwan : Not many people worked in this issue [the war on drugs] becaus e generally they dared not to [resist the war on drugs]. Interviewer: In that time, as seen in the news, it was you, and a few human rights professionals [who publicly work ed against the war on drugs]. But in the local [ and regional level s] are there any? Pa iwan : No one. There were only the representatives of the villagers who lodge d complaints [to the N ational Human Rights Commission] Inter v i e wer: How about the full time NGOs? Pa iwan : Almost none. Interviewer: How about lawyers who worked in other provinces [outside Bangkok]? Pa iwan : Not many or almost none. Most are lawyers from t he Lawyer s CouncilNot many. [Pa iwan had a deep sign ]. (Paiwan/HM1/pp. 44 45) The low number of those who were actively involved with law and justice related to the war on drugs might be because, as accepted by Santi, a human rights lawyer, m ost of NGOs ha ve their own long standing issues tied to some social movement, funded by foreign -financial sources (Santi/HM5/pp. 42 ). The war on drugs was rather a contingent and sudden event. Therefore, i t might be impossible for them to move a resource and work seriously in the issue s related to the war on drugs. Tippawan, another full time professional for an NGO accepted that because of resource constraints her action against the war was only a side line activity (Tippawan/HF5/pp. 2). The other reason might be that as suggested by several human rights professionals the atmosphere of fear created by the Thaksin administration deter red not only ordinary people but also lawyers, NGOs, and even politicians from doing things against the war effort


87 Finally, 12 human ri ghts professionals were identified and interviewed. Of them, seven were human rights lawyers (having law degree s ) and five were human rights workers (having other degree s ). Because of the small network of human rights professionals actively work ing for law and justice related to the war on drugs, most of the human rights professionals seemed to know each other Most of them used to work together at some level Therefore, all interviews for human rights professionals were clustered at Bangkok and Chiang Mai (a northern province) only Aggrieved People : Most of the interview s for the aggrieved were conducted at their ho mes only a few at their offices in private rooms. I obtained their names from the publicly available annual reports of the National Human Righ ts Commission (NHRC). The officer s from the Office of the National Human Rights Commission helped me to make an initial contact with them. I, then, contacted only those who agreed with the initial contact to participate the research. Eighteen aggrieved peo ple were identified contacted and then interviewed. Two cases of abuse occur red in Bangkok, eight cases in the north -e astern provinces, two cases in the N orth, and six cases from the rest of the country. However, most of the interview s took place in Bang kok where the aggrieved people who made a complaint to the N HRC resided or work ed All interviews were conducted privately with the respondent s except for two interview s where their spouses also joined the interviews. One was a middle aged woman (Jan dara ) who fought to free her sister from jail due to a false accusation of police. The interview was joined by her husband. However, his presence did not influence her expression. For example, s he frankly accepted that when she and her relatives went to talk with the public prosecutor who was responsible for her sisters case, they would bring some kind of gift, such as seafood for him


88 personally. Her husband immediately interrupted to make his wife not look too bad by noting that they gave it to him when the c ase was already ended. However, she insisted that s he did not give him at the end but during the trial. S he knew consciously what she did was morally and legally wrong She accepted that what she did was to give something under the table to the state offic ers (bribery) to ask them to be nice and kind to her sister. I learned that during the time of the war it was she who played a leading role to help her sister get out of jail. I did not see her husbands role in her conversation about her hardship in that time. The other couple ( Chana and his wife) did not have a conflict response. Rather, they both actively explained their experience s with law and justice in the same ways Unlike Jan daras story Chana s narrative always recounted his experiences in the w ays in which his wife did. She also played the important role. Analysis My raw data included hundreds of interview pages in Thai language. With keeping the research questions in mind, I read and reread the data several times to note core ideas and concept s, recognize emotive stories, and find [emergent] themes (Rubin and Rubin 1995, 229) The data w ere initially grouped into categories in relation to the research questions. The data sheets were also created to summarize the emerging themes, c oncepts, and ideas raised by each respondent. The data sheets helped make comparison wi thin and across the categories. I brought the initial thematic structures of the categories to discuss my advisor, Professor Lonn Lanza -Kaduce. The discussions aimed to refine the discovered themes and verify the constructed categories. After several o ccasions of discussion some themes were dropped off and replaced by the new ones (pulled out from the data sheets) until we both agreed on the themes and categories that of fer the most accurate, detailed, yet subtle description and explanation of the phenomenon under the study.


89 Then, I translated the selected full quotations in Thai to English. The translation tried to keep the original (Thai) meanings, while trying to make sense for the English readers at the same time The translation was verified through several occasion s of exchange between the adviso r and me to make sure that the final translated version met the two purposes above. The main goal of analysis is not to fi nd a majority of experience and/or perceptions of the respondents to construct a single pattern of description and explanation. Rather, the qualitative analysis recognizes the unique response of each respondent. The point is to describe and explain the phe nomenon in all dimensions as much as possible with a subtle and detailed treatment However, this study does have a general overarching theme. It refer s to the general structure of legal consciousness within the Thai society because the respondents talked about law and justice at two levels. I n the specific context of the war on drugs they got involved (as, e.g., a lawyer or the aggrieved) Also, as ordinary people, observers, critics etc., they have a general idea of law and justice (This is the advantage of the active interview allowing the researcher to hear not only what people say but also how they say it .) For example, Kanchai as a human rights professional joining the National Human Rights Commission to investigate human rights abuses during the war on drugs, expressed his ideal goal to encourage people affected by the war to make a human rights claim against the ruthless war on drugs However, when asked about his experience in the court he, as a lawyer, frankly accepted that he would suggest his c lient like other lawyers do, not to press charge s against police officers for their abuses of power ( e.g., framing people as drug dealers). He justified his advice by claiming that the police officers are able to frame his client at any time. Before prese nting the full findings in next chapters, the descriptive demographic data are presented next


90 Demographics Th i rty respondents were interviewed. Demographic data collected during this study include age, gender, and hig hest education level achieved. Aggriev ed P eople Eighteen aggrieved people were interviewed. The age of the aggrieved people in the sample ranged from 35 to 72, and the mean age was 49.72. Forty four percent of the aggrieved are male and 56 % are fe male. The education level of the aggrieved ra nged from primary school (Prathom 4 or 6 in Tha i) to a bachelor degree; 33 % completed primary school (Prathom 4 or 6) with on e among them being illiterate; 1 7 % completed middle school; 22 % completed high school; 28 % completed diploma or h igher (with o ne person studying a m aster degree). Over 44 % involved with the war on drugs because the ir loved ones were killed. 22 % are those who themselves were falsely accused of being committing drug offense s. Of them, one was only searched without having experien ce in a court trial. 33 % are those whose loved ones were falsely accused of committing drug offense s. Human Rights Professionals Twelve human rights professionals were interviewed. T he age of human rights professionals in the sample ranged from 37 to 61, and the mean age was 45.66. Almost human rights professionals are male. Only one is female. The education level of human rights professionals ranged from a bachelor degree to a master degree; 58 % completed bachelor degrees and 4 2 % had a ma ster degree. Of them, 58 % have a law degree and 41 % have no law degree. 25 % of them used to study or ha d a short training abroad related to international human rights.


91 CHAPTER 5 DOMESTIC LEGAL POLIC Y AND PRACTICE Studying the fit between legal policies set out in su bstantive law and legal practices used to implement those policies is a mainstay o f law and society scholarship. This chapter reviews the respondents interpretations of how the policy on the war on drugs was tr anslated into legal practices. The interviews with the human rights professionals are given special attention. The legal and extra -legal frames are categorized both to understand the patterns of practices used in the war on drugs that violated the rights and liberties of people and to appreciate the ways in which the authorities acted with impunity. The first section explores how the criminalization of the victims of the war on drugs was accomplished. Human rights professionals, who are most familiar with the domestic legal practices, provide much of the insight into what happened and how it came to pass. The presumption of innocence gave way to a working presumptio n of guilt for anyone accused. Oral evidence, including hearsay evidence, played a major role in the accusations through blacklists and ple a bargains. Evidence was planted ; investigations were cursory. The criminal labeling enabled the local authorities to target victims of kha tat -ton and to make a high number of arrests within the three months of the war on drugs .1 The second section exam ines the legal consequences of being accused. Those who were arrested and the families of those who were killed were subject to property forfe iture and lost other benefits. They found it difficult to get their day in court to determine what happened. The t h ird section reviews the practices that provided de facto impunity for the state authorities as they carried out the war on drugs. The final section introduces the role of money within Thai legal practice. 1 According to Bangkok Post (May 1, 2003), the government announced that from February through April 2003 a total of 1,765 big time drug traders and 15,244 small dealers were arrested. A total of 280,207 pushers and addicts surrendered and were rehabilitated. A total of 2,274 people were killed during the war with 42 killed by police officers acting in self defense.


92 Criminalization of the Victims Kha -Tad -Ton The mos t striking abuses during the three -month war on drugs were the extra leg al killings of so many people. The government expediently dismissed the killings as kha tad ton. The rhetoric of kha -tad ton replaced the rule of law during the war on drugs by labeling the deceased victims as criminals (drug dealers) who were killed by others who wer e involved in the drug trade. However, this rhetoric does not convin ce human rights professionals. Rather they view the killings in the time of the war on drugs as extra ordinary crimes and point to the fact that assailants were neither brought to justice nor held accountable for almost 3,000 killi ngs during those three months. The pattern was extraordinary in part because human rights professionals noted that the Thai police were much more efficient in making arrests in other cases of murder. The following quotation demonstrates explicitly the basic skepticism among human rights professionals. Generally, [the police make] some progress with the investigation and at least some one is accused and even arrested. But [for the war on drugs] no one is arrested for the killings. Hows that! (Pinit/HM4/pp. 41) The human rights professionals are also not convi nced by the polices theory of kha -tad ton because it is unimaginable that dru g gangs could kill so many with no arrests made and only do so during the three months of the governments war on drugs. A similar pattern of killings did not occur either bef ore or after the war on drugs. Kampon, a senior human rights professional with ex perience in several social justice movements both within Thailand and abroad, makes the point clearly. If they [the police] explain the killings as kha tad ton, it is an absurd explanation. It is absurd in this sense: which [drug] gangs are able to kill 2,800 people [with no one] being arrested at all (Kampon/HM1/pp. 8)


93 The state authorities did not bother to prove the criminal guilt of those killed during the drug war because they could c ategorize all the killings as kha -tad t on. In addition, the regu lar procedure s to investigate the killings w ere also waived. The most important problem was that th e police intentionally paid little attention to the develop ment of the evidentiary records. Human rights professionals were of two minds about the problem of proving the criminality of those killed, saying that the evidence needed to prove the killings wa s both difficult and not too difficult to get Establishing the proof was difficult, according to some human rights professionals, because the killers were ve ry professional, knowing how to elude being traced. Others saw developing the criminal evidence as not a much problem in practice. The comment and experience of Sombat, a lawyer who provided legal assistance to clients from ethnic groups at that time, demo nstrated both points.2 He insisted that it was not too difficult to collect criminal evidence and to look for the killers. However, if the state authorities commit t ed the killing or the killings were involved state authorities, it was hard to get anything useful for criminal proof. Interviewer: [C]ollecting criminal evidence, is it practically difficult? Sombat: [I]t is not too difficult to do if the police quickly arrive at the scene and immediately compile evidence. Do not let time pass. This is a usual p ractice. I think it is not beyond the polices capability. However, if the killings involved the state authorities, it is very difficult [to get useful criminal evidence]. This is because the state authorities know how to leave no trail. I did one case about torture but the victim [survived]. I checked the incident but found no clue of torture and fighting. Nothing could be used as evidence [in court]. (Sombat/HR4/pp. 6) Paiwan and Samsen, who had joined the National Human Rights Commission to examine sever al killings during the war on drugs, point to the real problem of law enforcement at that time. The 2 Ethnic people referred here are used interchangeably with hill tribe people. They are called chao khao in Thai (litera lly mountain people). The Thai government recognizes six groups of them: Karen, Hmong, Mien, Lahu, Akha, and Lisu (see Lewis and Lewis 1984).


94 police intended not to deve lop the evidentiary records for all drug -related murders during the war on drugs Consider the following conversation with Paiwan Pa iwan : Collecting criminal evidence is not difficult to do. But the hard problem is that the police [acted] like they knew nothing about investigation work. [ Paiwan burst out laughing]. For example, [you tell me whether] you think this is nonsense. The victim went to report himself at the district office and he got a phone call [while there] to go out to see someone. Then, he rushed out and was shot dead, but his phone SIM card was taken. The police did not check about it. Ah! What does this mean? When t he cartridges and bul lets were found at the incident C ould they track which guns were used? Yes, they could, but you know what the police told us (the National Human Rights Commission). The data system was broken down so that it could not be used to ident ify the guns! Interviewer: It is not about evidence collection. Paiwan : No, its not Interviewer: It seems the police officers did not do their regular jobs, right? Paiwan : Yes ...Like I have just told you about those aggrieved people who made a complaint in 2006 [after Thaksin was ousted by the military coup]. They recounted in the complaints that they saw a group of strangers come in the village, and they saw this group drive off after they heard gun shots. This information was not in the investigating a nd interrogating record of the local police. So, it might take ten reincarnations to catch up with the killers! [Paiwan pounded on the table when making his point]. No ways [to arrest anyone]. We [National Human Rights Commission] also asked the [local] po lice why they did not put this information in its investigating and interrogating record. They became dumbfounded! In fact, people had already given this information to them. The problem was the police did not want to examine the facts. ( Paiwan/HM1/pp. 29) Samsen affirmed Paiwans comment and added a remark that it was state policy at that time to deliberately leave the evidentiary records underdeveloped. In his words: Samsen: The state authorities did not pay attention to investigating the killings. When t hey reported the killings as kha tad t on, the cases were closed. Interviewer: Is this [a] problem of collecting criminal evidence? Samsen: No, its not. The police did not enquire about more evidence. Interviewer: It seems the problem is not about the difficulty or ease in collecting evidence. Samsen: Actually, this implies that the government did not have a policy to identify the unknown assailants. Why is this so? This is because, I believe, the unknown gunmen [were tied] to state authorities acting i n accordance with the policy of kha tad ton. (Samsen /HM1/pp. 51)


95 The killings were not only the most serious a buses during the war on drugs. Many others were accused of drug offense s and arrested but s urvived their ordeals. In order to understand what ha ppened, the various practices of the local au thorities need to be examined. The analysis turns, next, to an examination of how the Thai law and legal practices labeled some citizens as drug offenders and contributed to a buses during the war on drugs. One o f the interviewed lawyers offered an overview. Usually, the facts in the complaints by the aggrieved [to the National Human Rights Commission] were totally opposite from those proposed by the police. They gave a different picture. The aggrieved often menti oned that they were beaten or encountered several difficulties. The police proposed another scenario: Theyd followed the aggrieved for such a long time. Their informers gave them the information for the location and time of drug trading. Then, they pretended to buy narcotic drugs Finally, [when] they succeeded [in making a purchase they] arrested the aggrieved In the interrogation stage, the aggrieved confessed. The court would set up the case by relying on the indictment of the police. To make a strong er case about the drug related behaviors of the aggrieved, the police would come in the jail, find offenders who got punishment for abusing drugs, [and get one of them] to sign a paper indicating they purchased drugs from the aggrieved, even though they ha d never seen the face of the aggrieved. The signed paper was submitted to the public attorney for the courts trial. Its the other offenders who abuse drugs that shift the blame on the aggrieved. It sounds reasonable, ha! So, how is it possible for the a ggrieved to rebut the accusation? (Kanchai /HM3/ pp. 1617) Presumption of G uilt Human rights professionals decr ied that the legal response to the mass killings and other abuses during the war betrayed the rule of law Basic due process procedures to prove guilt gave way to practices that presumed guilt. Paiwan a senior human rights lawyer who has a lot of trial experience with social justice issues, points to the abnormality of the legal practices during the war on drugs where the presumption of guilt super ceded that of innocence. He laid out the black letter law on the presumption of innocence that was supposed to have prevailed. Although he spoke to the issue in the context of the killings, the presumption of innocence also extends to those who were merely accused and arrested.


96 [D]ont forget that according to the Constitution, people are presumed to be innocent until proved [guilty] as announced by the courts final verdict. Did those killed people have a chance to prove their innocence? Moreover, by law the criminal accusation is dropped when the accused are dead. Therefore, the killed people must be considered innocent anyway, although drugs are found [at the incidents]. However, this principle was not [followed by the justice officers]. Therefore, the relatives of the victims did not qualify for a remedy [as they should have ] if we use the Constitution as the foundation ... (Paiwan/HM1/pp. 41) If the Thai Constitution would have been applied, the families of the dead (who should have been presumed innocent) should have been eligible for a remedy. For those who were merely arrested, several human rights professionals expressed concern about court practices that did not take the presumption of innocence seriously. These respondents thought that too many judges, especially the young judges of the Court of First Instance, got caught up in the moral panic about drugs and adopted the majoritys feeling of antipathy to drug dealers. So, for example, they often imposed the maximum punishment. Some human rights lawyers blamed the judges for presuming that accused drug offenders would always deny the criminal charges. Pleading guilty was perceived as a rare behavior for alleged drug offenders, whereas more ordinary crimina ls were likely to admit guilt. This pla ced those falsely accused in a difficult bind: pleading not guilty made them appear as if they were more likely to be guilty. They noted that judges, instead of opening a court hearing by inquiring about matters of innocence, began the sessions by asking l eading questions and statements: whether you [the defendant] would c onfess; if you [the defendant] did confess, you would be punished less than usual; if you [the defendant] confess, the rate of punishment will be knocked in half. Some human rights l awyers argue d that these leading questions influenced defendants to plead guilty rather than to stand trial to establish guilt or innocence.


97 Kanchai a lawyer, related his experience from working with the National Human Rights Commission, an experience tha t seemed to be shared by several other human rights professionals. He sees both the judges and public attorneys (prosecutors) as presuming guilt. Kanchai: The judges w ould presume that every offender always denies a charge. It is not presumed that every of fender is innocent. Yeah, its a legal principle [but] in practice, the offenders are not presumed innocent Interviewer: You mean they presume the offenders guilty, dont you? Kanchai: Ah! It needs to find the way out [under the presumption of saying no ]. Sometimes, the public attorney would discourage the aggrieved. Do not fight. J ust accept it. Not many tablets [of drugs] wouldnt take so long to get released [from jail]. Interviewer: Does he not look up the facts? Kanchai: He relies on the facts i n the indictment [supplied by the police] The public attorney does not want to have a conflict with the police. (Kanchai/HM3/pp. 1617) In this conversation, the presumption that the accused will deny the charges moves the case further into of the justice system, but it does not protect the rights and liberties of the people. Other interviews indicate that it is not only some public attorneys and judges who try to persuade the offenders to plead guilty. Some police and even lawyers, especially duty solicit ors (free service lawyers appointed by the court), also suggest that offenders should plead guilty and waive trial. Saijai, a 71 years old woman whose son was falsely accused of taking drugs, recalled the moment she was persuaded by the lawyer and police t o give up a trial. [After Saijai complained a lot about expenditures for her sons defense, the interviewer asked: Why dont you ask for assistance from the free -service lawyer appointed by the court to help you save money] ? Nonsense! The first time, I wen t to the court and met with one lawyer at the court. I think he was a retired police officer. I told him all about my story. He and I then went to the police station I had a problem with the other day. He talked with the Police Superintendent for long hour s. When he was done talking, he told me that oh it is easy to solve, madam! I asked him how to fix the problem. Since its only a tablet [methamphetamine] your son [will not be] imprisoned. He told me such. I glared at him. I could feel that he was v ery familiar with all the police over there. He told me further, just make confession. Not be jailed because of only a tablet. Just be put on probation. I was thinking they [the free -


98 service lawyers] helped police. So, I never asked him to be my lawyer a nd never contacted him again. I searched and paid a lawyer by myself. (Saijai /AF6/pp. 64) Perhaps the clearest demonstration that a working presumption of guilt displaced the legal presumption of innocen ce was seen in bail practices. The judges hardly ever granted accused drug offender temporary release on bail; the bail bond was often set at a very high price. Several human rights professionals indicated that the police and prosecutors often opposed release on bail. The judges also rarely frequently did gr ant release on bail. While awaiting trial, Jai was imprisoned for almost 2 years Jandaras sister for 6 months, Chairojs father for 3 months, Danai for over 5 years, and Na mtip for almost 2 years All were eventually pronounced not guilty. None of the ag grieved people interviewed in this research had been criminally accused or jailed before the war on drugs. In narcotic s offense s, the courts usually set a high price for the bail bond. Ruksa, a lawyer from Lawyer s Council of Thailand request ed release on bail for his clients. Although the police did not find anything illegal during the searches, they arrested them and confiscated their properties on the same day. The court set a very high price of a bail bond for their temporary release during trial, 5 million baht (125, 000 U.S. dollars in that time ) for each. However, Ruksa and other lawyers from the Lawyer s Council went to the Head of Judges and succeeded in reducing the bail amount. The collateral bail bond was high at 5 million Bath. The first time, we [the Lawyer s Council] tried to help by talking with the head of judges [of the Provincial Court]. We presented him with the facts we had and told him that the clients suffered a lot in the justice system with such a high price of collateral bail bond. S o, we asked for mercy from the court to reduce the price of collateral bail bond. The court reduced [the bail] but not for all of them. (Ruksa/HM 2/pp. 10 11) From Ruksas perspective it took a lawyer to talk with the highest figure in the provincial court to have an impact even then the request was rejected for some clients. He may have had success (albeit limited) because he and the other lawyers worked for the Lawyers Council (a


99 respected bar organization). Ordinary lawyers might not have such negotiating power with the judges. As a rule, the aggrieved people who were interviewed had a hard time to make bail. Blacklists a Source of Accusations by Pointing a Finger The Thaksin government enlisted local community organizations t o help wage the war on drug s. Specifically, it used the village community. The village community consisted of local representatives from a variety of groups in the area. The Thaksin government had each village community compile a list of local people who were involved with dru gs. The lists (which became known as blacklists) were submitted up the bureaucracy to the district and provisional offices under the control of the Interior Minister. The blacklists were, in turn, used to keep track of how well the war was being waged in t he local vicinities. According to the aggrieved, all that it took was someone to point a finger; rumors were enough. Kitti s father was killed shortly after he had gone to the local police and successfully got his name removed from the blacklist. Rattana, who lost her mother and stepfather to the drug war, said that People rumored for a long time [that my parents w ere thought to be drug dealers] (Rattana/ AF6/pp. 129). Ladda (AF6/pp. 122) whose husband was killed during the war on drugs, blam ed the villa ge community: Before my husband was killed, one of his close friends noticed that we were richer than usual. Kanchai, a professional lawyer who joined the subcommittee of the National Human Rights Commission to examine human rights abuses during the wa r on drug, articulated the ways in which ordinary people were officially named as drug dealers. By pointing their fingers at others, named drug offenders transformed ordinary people into drug traffickers and targets of the war. [I]t is not easy to find evi dence to arrest [the big professional drug dealers] and the witnesses [against them] are not protected effectively by the justice system. [So, no one wants to be a witness]. Therefore, [in the time of drug war] the police needed to arrest the accused peopl e first and tried to find the evidence to back up a criminal charge later. If the police used the offenders in jails to point to you, you would become a big drug dealer. Did

PAGE 100

100 those offenders have any interest with the framings? Of course not, but if they di d not give cooperation, something bad might occur to them. (Kanchai /HM3/pp. 20 21) Paiwan described what happened bluntly. Its like when you were arrested with drugs, you would be asked to implicate someone on the polices blacklist. Just poin t to them! (Paiwan /HM1/pp. 35) Several aggrieved people interviewed in this research related such an experience. Danai, for example, was a local leader arrested and imprisoned awaiting trial for five years. The Court of First Instance found him guilty and sentenced him to life imprisonment. However, the Court of Appeal reversed the judgment. During the interview, he recounted several activities he did as a leader against the drugs rampant in the community. He worked closely with the local police and became acquainted with them. So, he was surprised why he was framed by the local police as the most powerful drug dealer in the region. I still cannot imagine why I was framed ... They [police] wrote an excellent story used to frame me. A few offenders whom I helped to arre st became witnesses that confessed to the police that they traded drugs with meMy province was one of 23 provinces that was blamed [by the government] for not achieving the first periodical target of the war. My arrest helped the province reach the set ta rget. Normally, if the target was not achieved, the Provincial Governor and the Police Superintendent would be transferred out of the area. But my arrest saved them. My province was blamed for not reaching the first period -set target on February 23, 2003, and I was arrested a few day s later. (Danai/AM6/pp. 16970) Danai went on to decry the state authorities he used to work with. I thought the police could protect me because I worked closely with them and the district officers all the time. We knew each ot her for almost 10 years. But when I was accused of involving with drugs, no one came in [to help despite my being a good citizen]. (Danai/AM6/pp. 172) The Practice of Using Uncorroborated Evidence The chillin g account of two victims, Chana and his wife, dr amatized how the role of uncorroborated evidence was used to identify suspects, label them as drug offender s, and dispose of them through kha -tad ton. Their daughter and sonin law were shot dead with drugs found in their vehicle. Their properties were con fiscated on the day after the killing. Local police reported

PAGE 101

101 in the investigating record that the couple joined with another offender who had the same last name to deal with drugs in the region. Thus, the couple s were imputed to be part of a big drug netwo rk. However, after the Thaksin administration was ousted by the military coup in September 2006, the interim governments Division of Special Investigation (DSI) reviewed the case and found that the story reported by local police was untrue. Interviewer: I n the polices report, it said the deceased traded drugs with one offender who was jailed and had the same last name with them. Ch ana s wife: Yes, we were asked [by the DSI] whether we knew that man. They asked us to look at his picture but we had never se en him before. The picture of the deceased was also viewed by that man [who was in prison for dealing drugs]. He also did not know the deceased. Just the same last name. (Chana/AM6/pp. 160) The use of uncorroborated evidence was also a feature in a ccusatio ns that led to arrests. Indeed, the practice of relying on uncorroborated oral evidence was how the government achieved a high number of arrests during the three months of the war on drugs (February through April 2003). All the lawyers who were interviewed talked about the use of oral evidence to accuse and arrest people, much of which was of a hearsay nature in that it was made by third parties and was not corroborated One lawyer, Pa iwan laid out the black letter law on the use of uncorroborated oral e vidence. He indicated that hearsay evidence could not be used to decide the guilt of the hearsayimplicated persons without other substantial evidence. Paiwan: Then, we have to ask in general whether the public attorneys [prosecutors] should take a matter to trial [with only hearsay evidence]. Interviewer: They should investigate more about it, I guess. Paiwan: [H]earsay evidence ca nnot be [used in] a lawsuit the justice system at that time [during the war on drugs] was unusual. Interviewer: If [the accusat ion is based on] hearsay evidence, the public prosecutor should return the case to the police [for more evidence], right?

PAGE 102

102 Paiwan: The public prosecutor has to give a non -prosecution order. By principle, hearsay cannot be used as criminal evidence. This is the normal legal application. Without other convincing evidence, the implicated hearsay evidence alone cannot be admitted [in court] to punish people. So, I tell you it was an unusual justice system in that time[A]lmost 30 complaints [came] under the revi ew of the National Human Rights Commission [based on] hearsay during the war on drugs. The public prosecutor brought a criminal action against all of them. You can imagine that it took some time for a court trial. [Later during the interview, Paiwan indica tes that the courts eventually dismissed all these cases]. Interviewer: I think it must be very painful when people do nothing wrong but they must be present themselves in court. Paiwan: They [the aggrieved] must feel shameful because their neighbors know about the criminal lawsuits against them. Although they are poor, they still have to spend a lot of money to hire a lawyer. So, the victims of the war on drugs are not only the killed people. Its not. (Paiwan/HM 1/pp. 36 37) Indeed, although challenging th e hearsay was necessary to prevail in court, it occasionally led to disastrous consequences as one lawyer related. Ruksa recalled about his three clients who were implicated by hearsay evidence alone They were arrested for dealing drugs and their properti es were confiscated. Having no other substantial evidence, the public prosecuting attorney sought to settle the suit against them to avoid a full -blown court case so that the weakness of the evidence would not become known. Eventually, however, the court d ismissed the cases when the accuser did not appear at trial. Unfortunately, one of the clients was shot dead before he learned of the courts ruling. [T]he officers [were] defective in the performance of their duties and they feared being sued by the accus ed. Therefore, there was an effort to settle a charge in the court, even though they did not have other evidence except the hearsay implication. However, the polices witness implicating my clients did not appear at the day of the courts trial. (Ruksa/HM 2/pp. 6 ) Paiwan, a lawyer who joined the National Human Rights Commission to examine human rights abuses during the war on drugs, argued that a provision in Thai la w actually made matters worse. He discussed the role of a provision that was u sed to accuse ordinary people. He focused on the double -edg ed sword of the narcotics law. The law actually provided incentives to the accused

PAGE 103

103 offend ers to confess. The punishment would be reduced if their confessions yielded useful information that contributed to the su ppression of narcotics. The reason this cut both ways was that it was used during the war on drugs to increase rapidly the numbers of drug offenders. An accused drug offender could name anyone and hope to receive a lighter sentence. If those accusations we re taken at face value, without corroboration, the local authorities could inflate the numbers of arrests to meet government set targets. Recall that Paiwan indicated that nearly 30 cases were brought to the National Human Rights Commission in which the ac cused persons were implicated by the use of this kind of hearsay Interviewer: What is the hearsay implication you just mentioned? Paiwan : Wait! The savage thing with which I totally disagree is that the Narcotic s Act [B.E. 2522 (1979)], section 100/2 indi cates that if accused persons give information benefiting the authorities [by helping] to suppress narcotic s offense s, they have a right to be punished less than the [sentence] provided by law3For example, when the real drug dealer is caught, the police w ould persuade him to implicate anyone [as part of his drug gang]. Interviewer: This means the offender gives a benefit for law enforcement? Paiwan : Yeah! Therefore, a lot of people were implicated by hearsay evidence Interviewer: Did that help delete name s from the blacklist? Paiwan : To reduce the name lists. Then, the arrested person would be offered less punishment during the courts trial because he gave information that benefited the suppression of more drug dealers. So, I tell you section 100/2 is like the double -edged sword. It facilitated the war operation by increasing quickly the high number of people arrested for drug offense s, while those who actually committed drug offense s [the original offenders] received a light punishment. In this respect, w e have to ask whether the law is good or bad. ( Paiwan/HM1/pp. 3536) 3 The full provision of section 100/2 reads that If the Court is of opinion that any offender has given importa nt information for the very benefit of suppressing the commission of an offense relating to narcotics to an administrative official or a police official or an inquiry official, the Court may inflict less punishment than the rate of minimum punishment as pr ovided for such committed offense.

PAGE 104

104 Planting Evidence Paiwan a human rights lawyer who investigated and interrogated the state authorities for human rights abuses during the war on drugs with the National Human Rights Comm issioners, recounts the ways in which the killings took place. Some of the killings came about in crowded places; drugs were seldom found at the scene or on the body of the victim under these circumstances. On the contrary, drugs were often detected when t he killings occurred out of peoples sight such as in the victims private house. Some victims were killed on their way back home after reporting themselves to the s t ate authorities. Paiwan: According to the [complaints brought] to the National Human Right s Commission, we identified three patterns of killings. For those killed in deserted places, before the relatives of the victims arrived in the scene, drugs were already found [by the investigating police team]. Drugs were rarely found for those killed in the community [crowded] places. Interviewer: Umm, drugs were not found. Paiwan: Right. Drugs were rarely found [for the killings in the crowded places]. But all victims had their names on the blacklists [I]n cases where drugs were found at the incident, i t is not convincing to believe that drugs belonged to the victims. That is, the procedure to prove whether the drug container belonged to the victims [and] the proof of fingerprints [on the drug container] were exempt. The regular [ways to establish] proof disappeared from the practice. For the third case, drugs were found at the crime scene or at the body of the victims after the victims had just reported themselves to the police [at the police station] or to the district officers. The question is whether those people would take drugs with them when they intended to report themselves to state authorities. (Paiwan/HM1/pp. 26 27) According to most human rights professionals, drugs or other incriminating evidence found on the body of the victim or at the scene were there because the evidence was planted. Tippawan, a female human rights professional currently working on issues of justice in the South of Thailand where Muslim insurgents are operating, is explicit. In fact, she discern ed similar patterns of victim ization between what happened during the war on drugs and the on-going killings in the

PAGE 105

105 three southern provinces of Thailand where the Muslim insurgents often clash with the state patrols. As seen in newspapers, the pattern can be observed. That is, it is assumed wherever the killings take place, if there are no drugs there might be other illegal items [at the scene]. This is similar to what is going on now in the deep Southern provinces where the rifles are often found nearby the corpse. End! It is not nec essary to investigate and interrogate the killing anymore since th e victim is accused of being a terrorist comrade. (Tippawan/HF5/pp. 3) Legal Consequences for the Victims of the Criminalization The way s in which the war on drugs was waged had legal conseq uences for those caught up in the legal and extralegal practices that went beyond the kil lings, charges, and sentences. Both the human rights professionals and the aggrieved persons spoke of these. Not only did they document the range of consequences, they also related the extent to which these consequences contributed to the suffering of the aggrieved. Property Forfeiture One of the major legal consequence s was property forfeiture. The loss of property entailed both legal and personal dimensions. The prope rty of both those killed and those arrested were vulnerable t o confiscation by authorities. Because the dead victims were criminalized as drug dealers, their properties could be searched and confiscated. However, most human rights lawyers explicitly accus ed the state authorities of conducting unlawful property forfeiture because the law did not give them such broad power. Some also averred that the relevant laws [t he 1991 Act on Measures for the Suppression of Offenders in an Offense relating to Narcotics (B.E. 2534) or AMSOON], and the 1999 Anti -Mo ney Laundering Act (B.E. 2542 or AMLA ) put too much of the burden on the aggrieved to prove that their property was not tied to drug offenses. Due process usually places the burden of proof i n

PAGE 106

106 criminal cases on t he state. Consider the following conversation with Paiwan which illuminated this concern. Interviewer: I have just interviewed one human rights professional and he raised interesting stories about property forfeiture. For example, only two tablets of methamphetamine [gave] the state authorities [reason] to confiscate all properties. Paiwan: Even one tablet also led to property forfeiture. To talk about this, we need to see the loopholes in the laws first. The laws [ i.e., AMSOON and AMLA ] are upside down. T hat is, if the property is in doubt as being related to drugs, the laws authorize the confiscation of the property. More detestably, the aggrieved have a duty to prove that they acquired the confiscated property in good faith. Is that appropriate when the relevant state authorities have a legal power to subpoena all documents from the bank or wherever!? Thus, it should be the duty of the state authorities to prove that the property is related to drug offense s. Interviewer: [T]he state authorities have such legal power, right? Paiwan: The laws authorize them to do so. They can wiretap. They have the power to check private communications and to get the monetary information [of the aggrieved people] from the bank to prove whether their properties we re involved with drug offense s. (Paiwan /HM1/pp. 32 33) Paiwan explained further that property confiscation in that time received a green light from the government. The more local authorities seized in forfeiture, the more monetary reward they received. When people wer e killed, their properties were confiscated, so little was left for th eir heirs to live their lives. Thus, there was a material loss as well as the personal loss to the families. Moreover, a few human rights lawyers explicitly discussed how the operation o f property forfeiture during the war violated Thai laws. The police and ordinary state authorities did not have a legal power to initiate forfeiture. Again, Paiwans comments are most clear on this point. Paiwan: The police and general district officers do not have a legal power to do forfeiture unless they are assigned [that power] in writing by the Secretary General of the Office of Narcotics Control Board or of Anti -Money Laundering Office or by the Properties Examination Committee or the Transaction Committee Interviewer: But in the practice

PAGE 107

107 Paiwan: The police did forfeiture by themselves and submitted the lists of the items seized to the Office of the Narcotics Control Board and the Anti Money Laundering Office to verify their operation. This is ille gal! I tried to tell the government that this conduct is illegal. It is unlawfulproperty forfeiture. But the relevant authorities did nothing about it. The National Human Rights Commission also indicated in its several human rights examination reports tha t this was unlawful pr operty forfeiture! ( Paiwan /HM1/pp. 33) Some human rights lawyers do not attribute such unlawful property forfeiture to ignorance; rather they take a firm stand that the state authorities deliberately violated the laws to prosecute the war on drugs. Consider the following dialogue with Samsen, a human rights lawyer who is well known for his active effort against human rights violations during the war on drugs. Inreviewer: What about the property forfeitures? Samsen: I think the state au thorities deliberately abused the power. It is not simply an act of ignorance because all kinds of properties were seized. I think there are three [reasons the state authorities could give to do so]. First, the accused were wicked, so [the means by which] to live their lives deserved to be eliminated. In fact, the laws did not offer such a broad power to do so. The laws allow only the properties related to drug offense s to be seized. Second, it was the big mistake of the policy [of the war on drugs] to moti vate the state authorities by rewarding them with some percentage of the all values of the properties forfeited. The third reason was that they had a short period of time [to carry out] the war; therefore, [the local authorities pursued] forfeiture as much as possible [and could examine what they had done later] because the government commanded. Thus, the decision to forfeit needed to be quick. O therwise, they [the local authorities] might be doubted [and they could not look like they were reluctant] to hel p or [they might seem] to be taking the side o f the drug dealers. (Samsen /HM1/pp. 56) As this quotation suggests, the illegal property forfeitures are closely linked to the governments war on drugs. There was economic benefit to the authorities. Moreover, e ven lower state authorities feared to be labeled as helping or associating with drug dealers or appearing lax in their pursuit of drug dealers. The property forfeiture was a very painful experience for the aggrieved. Paiwan a human rights lawyer, recall ed the stories he heard while examining human rights abuses during the war on drugs with the National Human Rights Commission. Even when the aggrieved won their property back he found that many properties were damaged because the local police station did

PAGE 108

108 not have appropriate places to keep a number of seized properties. Sometimes, the local police used the car confiscated for their own business to the point of wearing it out. Some valuable items were stolen and could not be recovered. In his words: Oh! [He sighs.] The property forfeiture included very brutal practices. Did the local police station have a place to keep these properties? No! They just piled everything up together. Better some items might be covered by a canvas. Are the properties vulnerable to be broken down? Sure! Paiwan went on to describe the time line involved in recovering illegally seized properties. Paiwan: Then, it takes some time [for a claim] to be examined by the Anti-Money Laundering Office and the Office of the Narcotics Control Board. The Anti -Money Laund ering Office might spend three months for an examination, while the Office of th e Narcotic s Control B oa r d might take a year. Or, the properties might be examined for a year by the Office of the National Narcotics Control Board b efore it found no legal basis to confiscate the properties. The properties might be submitted to be reexamined by the Anti Money Laundering Office for another three months. During the property examinations, the properties were not taken care of as [they wo uld have been under] normal circumstances. More savagely, what we [the National Human Rights Commission] found most is the use of the confiscated cars. Several cars were tumble -down [worn out]. Sometimes their valuable parts were stripped off, like the car bumper protector. Interview: Was it for the sake of being not recognized? Paiwan: No, it was not but it [the car bumper protector] worth something. Sometimes, the cars max alloy wheels were also taken off [because they were tradable]. The new cars became old, with a hundred thousand in mileage. Interviewer: Did you get this information from the aggrieved? Paiwan: Yes, and it can be easily assessed by the deteriorated condition of the cars given the recent date of the sale as evidenced by purchase document s. Therefore, the sufferings from the loss of properties are seriously painful, no less so than the physical hardships [due to the war on drugs]. (Paiwan /HM1/pp. 34 35) Sombat a human rights lawyer, used to assist his clients to ask for a return of their cars. His experience revealed ho w difficult it was to negotiate with the local authorities; ordinary people would be hardpressed to challenge the state authorities actions on their own, even though the confiscations were illegal. The following exchange i llustrates the issue.

PAGE 109

109 Interviewer: Do you have some experience with the issue of property forfeiture? Sombat: I asked for the return of a pick up truck from one local police station in [a] province. The police seized it by claiming that the car was involved with drug offense s. I asked the Police Superintendent why my clients car was seized since he was not criminally charged and arrested. The Police Superintendent claimed that the car was seized under the Anti Money Laund ering Act. Therefore, I asked him whether he had the written authorization from the Anti Money Laund ering Office because by law the Anti -Money Laund ering Office [has to issue] a written order to specifically appoint the state officers to have the power to seize the properties [for later ex amination]. He [the Police Superintendent] then, gave out a hue shouting at me and beating around the bush. Never mind, I told him. I will write to the Anti -Money Laund ering Office to ask about your confiscation The Police Superintendent asked me wha t I actually wanted. I responded that if you find this car [was involved in] illegal activity, just pursue a legal proceeding because its been seized for almost two months without any criminal charge. I often saw your boys [the lower ranked police] use t he car. Finally, he surrendered and asked me to bring the evidence of title to get the car back. There were a lot of similar cases about cars [confiscated without a charge or any record of seizure]. (Sombat /HM4/pp. 8 9 ) Although Sombats successful negoti ation might be seen as a result of the power of legal knowledge, it would be premature to draw the conclusion that legal knowledge was an effective weapon in the war on drugs. An alternative explanation might be that Sombats success might have turned on t he nature of the interaction between people of standing the police superintendent and a lawyer rather then stemmed from his legal knowledge per se. Indeed, the use of legal knowledge by ordinary people to resist or challenge the power of the state authorit ies sometimes backfired and brought them more pain and harassment. Saijai, an aged woman whose son was falsely accused of abusing drug (one tablet), recalled what happened to her son when he tried to use legal knowledge by asking the arresting police team to show their official identification cards. Instead, he got beaten and blamed as hau -moh (tricky or sometimes foxy) Getting a Day in Court In one important way, the practice of kha tad t on interfered with the ability of vict ims to get a hearing in court. Imputing criminality to the deceased alt ered the death investigations. The

PAGE 110

110 Criminal Procedure Code generally requires an autopsy to be performed for unnatural deaths. The public prosecutor together with the inquiry officers ( i.e., the police) is to initiate the procedure. The procedure, however, changes if the unnatural death occurred under the control of the state authorities or while they w ere carrying out their duties. The courts are to conduct the a utopsy in such circumstances. Extra -judicial exe cutions, like those which occurred in the war on drugs, should prompt court procedures. By labeling the killings (unnatural death s) during the war on drugs as kha -tad ton (killings among drug dealers), the local authorities could preclude the courts from h aving any involvement w ith autopsies. In other words, kha tad t on categorizes those killed during the war as the victims of general unnatural death, excluding their cases from the courts review. Ruksa a lawyer, raised this practice. Interviewer: [C]an yo u, as a lawyer, identify how the killings during the war on drugs differed from murders at other times? Ruksa : The inquiry officer [police] has a duty to bring the criminals [the killers] to justice. However, during the war on drugs, the inquiry officers did nothing to crack down on the criminals. As seen in the news, the victims were killed by [a way of] kha tad t on. The courts trial for their deaths was also exempt because the killings were not committed by the state authorities. By law, if their cause of death involves the state authorities, the courts autopsy trial is needed to identify whether the action of the state authorities was lawful or their action was immoderate. But when the issue was changed to be the killings among the drug rings, the courts intervention was excluded. It was outside judicial review. Whatever, the police were to find out who the gunmen were, but it s eems nothing progressed at all. (Ruksa/HM2/pp. 11) Losing Other Benefits The criminalization of the deceased also resulted in their heirs losing some monetary benefits. For example, Bhornpan, whose sister and brother -in -law were shot dead, was annoyed with the life insurance company that denied benefit payments to the heirs because the couple were labeled as drug dealers by the police. The company told her to seek certification from the police to verify the innocence of the deceased. Bhornpan recalled that her brother -in law had a series of conflicts with the local police over traffic matters. On the night of their deaths, the

PAGE 111

111 co uple was called by the police to report to the police station to resolve some matter. On their way back home, they were both killed and a package of drugs was found in their car. Therefore, Bhornpan scoffed at the prospect that the police would confirm the innocence of the killed couple. Consider her words. [T]he insurance company refused to pay the benefits for the deaths of the couple because the cause of death involved drug offense sThe insurance company suggested that I ask for a written certification f rom the local police indicating that the deceased were not involved with drugs. Then, it would pay the benefit to their sons. Wow! No police would write such a certification of innocence for me because it was the police who confiscated all their properties with a charge of a drug offense (Bhornpan/AF6/pp. 45) In this quotation, the life insurance company accepted the conclusion of the police as true until Bhornpan proved otherwise. Thus the presumption of guilt extended beyond criminal prosecution. And it is not just the life insurance company that presumed guilt; it extended to state agencies, too, like the Comptroller Generals Department as Pintips experience illustrated. Pintips husband was shot dead and the police found one tablet of methamphetamine on the corpse, and his properties were all confiscated on the day after the killing. He was a midranked civil servant; therefore, Pintip should, by law, receive remuneration for his death. But the Comptroller Generals Department refused to pay her the be nefit because his death was related to a drug offense The Impunity of the Authorities Practice without Accountability The pattern of abuses and the myriad practices that contributed to the abuses suggest that local authorities acted with impunity for the most part. That conclusion is reinforced by the fact that most of the aggrieved persons who were interviewed expressively wanted to bring the officers who framed them or their loved ones to justice but did not or could not Interviewer: [Y]ou won the cou rts case, [but] no police officer was punished [for framing your son]. What did you think about it?

PAGE 112

112 Saijai: It was not correct. They should have been punished, so they would not dare to do it again. The police officers are too chesty. Like, after someone was arrested by them but found not guilty [by the court] later, the police officers didnt suffer punishment. Thus, the police officers would be bold to do it again. If they got some punishment, they would be careful in arresting [and criminalizing] people In fact, the police officers are able to frame anyone If the court finds him not guilty and acquits a charge, nothing happens to the police officers. If the court finds him guilty, he goes to jail. Only people suffer, and waste both money and [jeopardiz e their] health (Saijai/AF6/pp. 69 70) Although they wanted to pursue their abusers, they did not. Saijai has a lready presented one obvious rea son: they all feared reprisal. In fact, the police officers are able to frame anyone. Kanchai, a lawyer, although appointed to the subcommittee examining human rights violation during the war on drugs, bluntly indicated that he recommend his clients not to sue those responsible because his clients remained vulnerable and could have been revictimized. So, as I told you, lawyers often advised their clients not to [fight back against] the police officerAlthough you might be driving your car in a correct manner, if they [police] pull you over. Just stop! They would charge you for driving over the speed limit, although you actually drove like a turtle runs. [Just accept it]. Give them money, if they call for it. Do not argue with them. Otherwise, some tablets of ya ba might be dropped on your cushion For myself, I would suggest you take it[it should be your] last choice to have a problem with the police. They can frame you at any time [in any matter]. (Kanchai /HM3/pp. 22) The victims also conveyed a s ense that they needed closure. As ordinary citizens the aggrieved wanted the return of peace to their lives, something tha t would be delayed or maybe even elude them completely if they challenged the power of the police officers. In addition to these rather obvious reasons for reluctance to pursue their abusers, their avoidance cannot be explained merely as psychological resi gnation. The interviews uncovered more subtle social pr ocesses that were also at work. Despite the abusive practices that occurred during the war on drugs, there were difficulties in holding those responsible accountable. Preventing Professional C onflict In the justice system, a lawyer is the only private agent standing against those f rom state agencies the police, public prosecutor, judges, and correction officers. The lawyer, therefore, as

PAGE 113

113 noted by Kanchai, is the only private actor to balance the use of the state power in the justice system. Lawyers can use law as the other state authorities do. Moreover, even if ordinary people know the law, they cannot use it effectively without the help of a professional lawyer. This is because, as Kanchai (HM3/pp 15) no tes, law is too complicated fo r ordinary people to deal with. Not all lawyers, however, are in the same positi on to represent the aggrieved. Especially for local lawyers the legal world during the war on drugs was interwoven into a larger social cont ext. According to some human rights profe ssionals who were interviewed, challenging the abuses of power during the war on drugs he ld the potential for conflict. Therefore, local lawyers were reluctant and the aggrieved were hard pressed to find a local law yer to take their cases. The local lawyers often had good relationships with the local state authorities. They did not want to generate conflict with the authorities. Their real word shaped their professional practice in ways that constrained access to rep resentation among the aggrieved. Pinit, a lawyer who worked for a long time on human rights issues, was a leader of a non government organization (NGO). His organization tried to connect the local lawyers who resided in other provinces outside Bangkok int o a network to provide legal assistance to people. He observed that because of the potential for high conflict from cases during the war on drugs, it was impossible to use local lawyers in areas outside of Bangkok (Pinit /HM 4/pp. 31). Thus, Saijai, an agg rieved person, who resided in Bangkok, did not have a hard time to hire a lawyer as other aggrieved people who resided in the provinces did. Jan dara s case is illustrative of the problems with legal representation She tried hard to help her sister who was framed by the local police as a drug dealer. Her first lawyer came from Bangkok, although her sister stood trial in a province in the far North Eastern region. Her lawyer

PAGE 114

114 always took a flight back and forth during the c ourts trial at Jan dara s expense. S he used a lot of money to pursue justice for her sister. She recalled what it was like. At the beginning, I tried to find a lawyer from the province [where her sister resided]. Actually I got one local lawyer and ag reed to pay him almost 200, 000 b aht [5, 000 U.S. dollars in that time ].4 Later, he told me that his relatives did not want him to take my case. He withdrew himself from my case. I have relatives living in Bangkok, so we decided to use a lawyer from Bangkok. He thought it was not a difficult case [to win]. However, the police always opposed our request for temporary release on bail. [Her sister was imprisoned for more than 6 months before the court found her not guilty]. (Jan dara/AF6/pp. 26) Lawyers as Peace M akers In addition to defending those a ccused of drug offense s, lawyers played another role. Even when the aggrieved won their court cases, their lawyers often advised them not to bring charges against the police officers for his abuse of power or to sue for ci vil damages (tort litigation). The ir lawyers had to warn them about seeking revenge against the officers that committed the abu ses, even through legal means. At first thought, some of them explicitly wanted to charge the police officers for their abuse of power and sue them for civil damages. However, their lawyers reminded them to have second thoughts. Consider the words of Saijai. Interviewer: [Y]ou told me that you wanted to sue the police officers who framed your son for drug offense but why didnt you do that? Saijai: At the beginning I wanted to get them back, so I consulted my lawyer. He did not want me to do that because my house is located like this [a remote area in Bangkok]. He feared the police might do something bad to me. The police might not do it by themselves but have oth ers to do it, he warned me. They can do many [bad] things to us. No one knows. Nowadays, my resentments still glowing. I want to sue them actually. The time for litigations not ended yet. I want to sue them for doing bodily harm to my son, for using exc ess force and for their abuse of power. (Saijai /AF6/pp. 66) The fear of reprisal did not stop Chairoj who wanted to hold the police officers accountable f or framing his father. He too wanted revenge. His lawyer advised him to drop his thoughts to sue. 4 The average rate of exchange in 2003 was 40 baht for a U.S. dollar.

PAGE 115

115 He c ontacted a few other lawyers, but they also refused to help him. The bottom line was that he could not find a lawyer to pursue the case. Waiver The police employed another practice that allowed them to operate with impunity and made it less likely that the y would be held acc ountable. They would have the aggrieved sign a paper to waive the right to sue the police officers. Jan dara whose sister was falsely accused of possessing drugs, shared her experience. Her sister was taken by the police to the police st ation immediately after being freed from jail after win n ing the legal contest. The police officers asked her sister to sign a paper indicat ing that she would not bring charges against them. Interviewer: What did your sister think at that time [about her g rievance]? Jan dara : Let bygones be bygones because we cannot fight them anyway. Interviewer: How about yourself? Jan dara : At first, [I thought we] should fight back. But I think my sister was correct. We are not in a big clan. We have only the two of us. M y sister told me. Dont you see! Some were shot dead because they tried to fight back. We fear this. They do not have a human mind. My sister did nothing but she was also framed. By being detained in prison, my sister feels chastened. If we rise to fight back, we might die, or become crippled. It could be worse than what we are now. When my sister was in jail, she shivered and kept telling me all the time; Help me! Help me! (Jan dara/AF6/pp. 27) The Realities of Taking on the State The human rights prof essionals understood the realities of bringing charges against or suing the abusers. For example, Kanchi, a professional lawyer, compared litigation against drug offenders with that against state authorities and indicated that the officers had a lot to los e and would be highly motivated to win the case. [I]t is not difficult to contest a lawsuit because it uses usual cross examination like other criminal cases. Where did the exhibits (drugs) come from? How did you get them? What information is [there] abou t the implicating persons? Can the police officers informer be identified? It is a normal legal contest. But if you [the accused offender] wins the case, it means you smash their potsThe police officer would encounter more trouble in his

PAGE 116

116 careerHis witn esses and evidences [for other similar cases] would be less convincingThe second strike is that he fears to be sued by the aggrieved. His boss would be reluctant to help. If the boss helps, he would provide other officers as witnesses [for the courts tri al] or issue a paper to affirm that he really performed official duties. But win ning or los ing is a personal matter. (Kanchai/HM3/pp. 21) Kanchai indicated that if the police officer were sued for abuse of power, he would still be defended by the public pr osecutor The aggrieved people, on the contrary, would have to find their own lawyer. Therefore, the police are often nice to the public prosecutor In his words: Kanchai: Then, when the police officer is sued for abuse of power [by people], who will be hi s defender i n the court? The public prosecutor You see. So, the police should give good care to the public prosecutor Interviewer: For a case of abusing power, isnt it a personal dispute for the police officer? Kanchai: He has to insist that he correctl y carried his official duty. [So, it is not his personal misbehavior]. (Kanchai /HM3/pp. 2122) The police officer was still in a better position than the aggrieved in the judicial contest over abuse of power. The officer would be defended by the public pro secutor as the representative of the state, and could take the position that he was only carrying out his official duty to serve and protect ing the public and doing it during a pop ularly supported war on drugs. The aggrieved, on the other hand, would appea r to be pursuing narrow self interests in any lawsuit for dam ages against a police officer. The officers would go to court in a better p osition than would the victim. Therefore, a lawsuit to pursue accountability for violations of rights by authorities mig ht prove to be i mpractical. The Role of Money One of the realities that victims had to face was f inancial. The role of money highlighted important features of the practice of domestic justice. On one hand, various practices within the domestic law framewor k involved transactions that illustrated the extent to which lower level authorities acted with impunity On the other hand, economic constraints precluded many from

PAGE 117

117 seeking to hold those responsible for abuses accountable Economic considerations broadene d the impunity authorities enjoyed during the war on drugs. The interviews revealed the normalcy of ex changes of money for services. Indeed, some aggrieved people explicitly perceived that money motivated the behaviors of law enforcement officers. The p ractices put those caught up on the wrong side of the war on drugs in difficult situations. Justice and injustice both had price tags for the innocent. Legal Gratuities for Better S ervice Rattanas story explicitly illustrated the culture of gratuities that existed. She had to pay money for a law enforcement officer to bring back the pick up truck stolen during kha tad ton. Her story was compelling because it reflected the blurred line between formal and informal justice. She raised the issue herself imme diately after answering the basic demographic questions in the interview. Throughout the interview, she talked a lot about property and debts after her mother and stepfather were killed and accused of being drug dealers. Her responses indicated the importa nce of property to her and her awareness of the costs of the informal justice practices. Rattanas parents were shot dead at home in the early morning and a group of unknown assailants took a pick up truck, which was surety for her mothers installment pu rchase plan. Almost a year later, she received a phone call from a police officer working in a distant province. He claimed that her car was foun d, and he asked her for 50, 000 baht ( 1, 250 U.S. dollars ) to bring it back to her. She negot iated the price do wn to 10, 000 baht ( 250 U.S. dollars ). She was confident that the police officer made up a story. However, she thought it was necessary to give him money for kaa naam ron -naam chaa (a gratuity). Rattana: In that time, a group of people called my mother to open the door. They came into the house [and shot my mother]Then, they took my mothers car, cash, and cell phone. No money was left for her funeral. The car had disappeared for a yearI had a salary in t hat time of only 7, 000 8, 000 baht (175200 U .S. dollars ). I had to pay debts for her car and house because of [purchase agreements]Later, I got a phone call from one police

PAGE 118

118 officer. He told me excitedly that he found the car, which an offender was trying to take across the border into a neighboring country. Later, he told me that he got the car but the offender escaped arrest. T he officer asked me for 50, 000 ba h t ( 1, 250 U.S. dollars ) for his time, for kaa nam ronnam -chaa [gratuity]Through the phone, I told him that I still owed on this car. I didnt buy it with cash. He said, Oh, you didnt buy it with cash? So, I let him know that the car company brought a civil action against me for 340, 000 b a h t (8,500 U.S. dollars) that I owed. I told him I was still at my wits end to pay it back. Days l ater, he called me again, so I asked him for a reduction to 20, 000 baht ( 500 U.S. dollars ). I told him that I would borrow money from othersThen, he made an appointment to hand over the car to me at the local police station [where I resided]. Since I kne w someone who used to be a police officer at this police station, he helped and asked some police officers in that station to negotiate with the officer who would return the car to me, because I could not find enough money. Finally, I paid 10, 000 baht for getting the car back ( 250 U.S. dollars ). Interviewer: Did you notice [what] the mileage was? Rattana: Oh, very far. It was some hundred of thousand miles. Interviewer: Do you feel doubtful about what happened to your car? Rattana: I think it was a police officer who took my car. Interviewer: Why do you think so? Rattana: Because it was the time of the war on drugs ( Rattana/AF6/p p 126127) The surrender of Rattana to the informal justice was generally understood by the local authorities. In fact, when sh e got the first phone call about her car from the distant police officer, she consulted the junior duty police officer at the local police station. He was not surprised at all but worked with her to get the car back. Moreover, the hand over took place at t he local police station in front of many local police officers. Some friends accompanied her. It seems that everyone who was involved with or witnessed the arrangement saw it as a normal occurrence. Interviewer: On the day of handing over the car at the l ocal police station, did the local police officers examine what happened to the car? Rattana: No one felt doubt or talked about it. You know, I called the junior duty (police) officer, who was responsible for my case, to tell him about the cars return. He said, Good for you. He congratulated me. Interviewer: Oh! Actually, he should have asked about who the officer was, how he got the car, and whether he had recorded an arrest. Nothing?

PAGE 119

119 Rattana: Nothing! The junior duty (police) officer just put in his re cord that the car was returned to me. That is it! Then, the [other] officer gave me a key in exchange for the money and then everyone went back to work. Interviewer: Was anyone with you at the police station when you gave money to that officer? Rattana: Ye s! There were many people when I gave him money. My colleague also accompanied me on that day. Interviewer: Do you think the cars return for exchange of money like this is legal? Rattana: I dont know. I think its normal. It is kaa-naam -ron -naam -chaa I am glad to get the car back (Rattana/AF6/p p 1 30) Even a brazen exchange with a police officer facilitated by other police officers to secure the return of a stolen car for money in public was normal The police acted in a climate of impunity. Cultu ral norms about kaa naam ron -naam -chaa had limits that evi dently were recognized. But those limits did not prevent local authorities from trying to create opportunities for other kinds of exchanges. Local authorities merely proceeded more careful ly accor ding to the aggrieved. Chana and his wife related their e xperience. They lost their daughter and sonin law during the war on drugs. They recalled that the spouses might not have been killed if they realized the polices game. Before the spouses were killed, a few local police officers visited them and dropped a hint about how to get their names off the blacklist. In the words of Chanas wife ; The police officers dropped a hint that the deceased should give some money to them A few police officers made a si de visit to their house and made a casual remark that if the deceased did nothing wrong, they [the police] would do their best to help, but they could not help guilty persons. In that time, my sonin law just responded to them that he had no involvement wi th drugs. He swore to them. (Chana/AM6/pp 1 63) Chanas wife came to reinterpret the purpose of the police visit as an effort to obtain money. Otherwise, the spouses would not have been killed and the local police officers would not have

PAGE 120

120 made up a false st ory that the spouses were part of the biggest drug trading network in the region. The response of Chanas wife went beyond the direct question asked. Interviewer: How did you feel about what happened? Chanas wife: I wanted revenge. She was my daughter. If she was guilty, I would not be mournful for her. In that time, they [police officers] came to see them. If they [my daughter and son in law] gave them money, they might have survived. But, the spouses thought that they did nothing wrong, so they did not pay ... (Chana/AM6/p p 163) In the same way, Jan dara came to think that her sister was illegally held for 12 days because the police were trying to bargain over money. (The Criminal Procedure Code allowed the police to have the accused in custody for only 4 8 hours.) Initially, she had no idea about practices that allowed exchanges; her lawyer eventually explained it to her at the end of the trial Actually, after the case ended, I was told that at the beginning they [the arresting police officers] wanted mon ey, while my sister was in their custody. If I would have decided to give them money, I think the accusation would have been dropped. But Id have never thought to give them money in exchange [for help] because she didnt do anything wrong. This is what my lawyer told me. Otherwise, by law, they [the police officers] could not detain my sister in custody for up to 12 days. (Jan dara /AF6/p p 34) Jandara had another experience in her pursuit of just ice that revolved around money. While she was fighting in the court for her sister, she was contacted by someone who used a threatening tone and who claimed that she could help her sister if Jan dara paid her money. Jandara refused. Jan dara : I was also contacted by a bail bond agent. She was the wife of the Police Sup erintendent so mewhere. She asked for 300, 000 b aht (7, 500 U.S. dollars ) with interest for bail surety. If I didnt do that, [she threatened that] I might be in the same situation as my sister. Interviewer: Were you threatened!? Jan dara : Threatened me! In that time, every pressure was put on me (Jan dara /AF6/p p. 2728) Jan dara s distant relatives also suggested that money be used in another way to solve the proble m.

PAGE 121

121 Even our relative residing in another province with whom I talked via the telephone suggeste d that I bail my sister out of jail and run away forever. I did not have enough money at that time. Also I argued and said we would not escape. (Jandara /AF6/p p 27 28) In an ironic ending, Jandara finally related that a less blatant exchange helped her sis ter prevail. Jan dara : My sisters case had to wait until the public prosecutor moved out [to take a new post in an other jurisdiction]. The justice for my sister came with the new appointed public prosecutor. If the first public prosecutor who brought lit igation against my sister still worked there until the end of trial, my sister might not be free. We were lucky because of th e change in public prosecutor. But if asked whether my relatives from Bangkok played tricks with the public attorney, I would say yes. Interviewer: How? Jan dara : [She gestures like giving something under table]. It was a gift! Otherwise, [she stops a second]It was like a kind-hearted treatment. My relatives from Bangkok would bring him sea crabs [for instance]. Jan dara s husband: T hey did that after, not before, the end of trial? Jan dara : No! No! We did that during the trial! (Jan dara /AF6/p p 29) She knew consciously what she and her relatives did was morally and might -be legally wrong. She accepted that what she and they did was li ke a bribe. Although Jandara s husband immediately interrupted to try to keep his wife from looking bad, Jan dara insisted that she and her relatives did provide gifts during the courts trial Other Costs of Pursuing J ustice All the aggrieved people who we re interviewed incurred costs during their struggles for justice, especially within th e bureaucratic justice system. The aggrieved visited and/or lodged complaints with various state agencies for two reason s. They wanted the higher agencies to establish th eir innocence, and they wanted these authorities to review the use/abuse of power of the local state authorities who framed th em for involvement with drugs. However, they often became trapped in the bureaucratic loop of justice instead of prevailing. Note that formal justice from the judiciary had no connection with any justice provided by bureaucratic agencies (the

PAGE 122

122 agencies under the administrative control of the government). In other words, their visits to lodge complaints had no impact on how ju stice pro ceeded in the courts. Instead, according to all of the aggrieved, the bureaucratic loop of justice added to thei r hardships and frustrations. They all raised concerns about expenditures and costs they incurred by visiting and making many complaints to provincial and state agencies. Saijais interview provided a good example. She visited several state agencies with her sons friends to ask for help while the public prosecutor brought a criminal action a gainst her son for abusing drug s with, as claimed by the police officers, only one tablet of methamphetamine found during search. In addition to the fee for a criminal defense lawyer, she spent a lot of money in her mostly futile pursuit of bureaucratic justice. Interviewer: Did you pay a lot of money in your s truggle for justice? Saijai; Its around 100, 000 baht ( 2, 500 U.S. dollars ) because I also had traveling expenses. At first, the police of ficers told me to bring 30, 000 baht ( 750 U.S. dollars ) to bail my son out but actually that amount was not enough fo r bail. So, I had to hire a surety person. I also had to pay a fee for a defense lawyer as well. Interviewer: How much did you pay for a defense lawyer? Saijai: 40, 000 bath ( 1, 000 U.S. dollars ). I did not get a penny back [even though we won the case]. I ncluding traveling expenses, I spent almost 100, 000 baht ( 2, 500 U.S. dollars ) since I often took wrong buses and routes [when visiting the state agencies]. Interviewer: Even though you are a Bangkok resident!? Saijai: Yeah, I havent traveled to anywhere except the Ramathibodi Hospital. Interviewer: I cant help imagining [what happened to] non -Bangkok residents [ e.g., rural people]. Isnt it hard for them? Saijai: My God! Even me [it was very hard]! I felt I would almost die b ecause [of all the] travelin g. There were some people who went with me. For example, I had to pay my sons colleagues travel expenses and for some hospitality because they came to help us [to prove that he was never involved with drugs]. This is my suffering. Its too bad. I feel ver y angry. I dont know how to tell anyone. (Saijai/AF6/p p 69 70)

PAGE 123

123 In this conversation, Saijai described her sense of injustice about spending a lot of money for her son even though he did nothing wrong. Her hardships were not rec ognized by any state agenci es. Rather than endure such difficulties, many affected people from the war on drugs might have chosen to stay home and passively internalize their frustrations and pain. Consider a comment from Pac hara on this point. Money was a determi ni ng factor when pe ople surrend ered their pursuit of justice. Interviewer: Do you think we [as people] can rely on law for justice and to punish the state officers violating our rights and liberties? Pachara: The problem is about the evidence. If we have good evidence, we mi ght bring them to the justice. However, we are just ordinary people. Ordinary people might feel fear and then obey the state officers. They might admit their own defeat implicitly [T] heir ways to struggle [for the justice] are less than those who have mor e money [the powerful]. Those big shot people have more alternative ways to fight [for the j ustice] than ordinary people do. Sometimes, they [ordinary people] dont know whom they can ask for help. So, they admit their own defeat implicitly. In addition, i t is said that the more they struggle [for the justice ], the more they get in trouble and the more it costs them. They might not have ability to stand firm. Although it is believed that money does not matter, it actually is an other factor. (Pachara /AF6/p p 146) In this conversation, Pachara did not simply reflect her own perception and experience but referred to the understanding of general people. She contrasted the capacity of the ordinary people to the big shot people who have more money and higher soci oeconomic status. The ordinary people did not have many choices because they lacked socioeconomic resources. Therefore, they were more vulnerable and had to accept naturally their own defeat and disengage from the struggle for justice. To s tand firm on the justice battle ground, money was an important resource. Like Pachara, most of the aggrieved referred in some way to how a lack of money mattered. One of the most troubling experiences with the role of money in the pursuit of justice was that of Chairoj. H is father was framed for possessing two tablets of methamphetamine (ya ba). He tried to free his father from jail during the courts trial, but the bail price was too high at

PAGE 124

124 200,000 baht ( 5, 000 U.S. dollars ). He spent three months trying to raise the money and later got help from a friend of his farther for bail. Every week he drove back and forth between Bangkok, where he worked, a nd his home town in a far north eastern province where his father was jailed. He spent a lot of his familys savings. Among th e other things, his wife later divorced him, although they had one child, not long after he won the courts case. Interviewer: Before you lodged a complaint [to many state age ncies], did you expect to get justice? Chairoj: I did. I told my father to be pat ientMy father asked me, Son, let me accept a charge because I dont want to get you in trouble. You dont need to strive for me and waste your money anymore I quarreled with my wife all the time because I had to drive back and forth [from Bangkok to a province in the North East]. I spent a lot of my familys money. Finally, we divorced. I have never got any compensation from the government. The government has never helped me. (Chairoj/AF6/p p. 152) The costs to pursue justice could be high. Chairojs fat hers p ragmatic assessment rang true; at some point the aggrieved may have to cut their losses and lump i t. Those costs may constrain ordinary citizens from asserting their rights and from seeking reviews of abuses of power.

PAGE 125

125 CHAPTER 6 NAMING, BLAMING, AND CLAIMING: A DECL ARATORY JUSTICE1 Naming t he Problems of the W ar on D rug s The V iolence of Law Enforcement When the aggrieved were asked what they th ought about the war on drugs m ost aggrieved people express ed that at the beginning of the war they were glad, liked and supported the war because drugs, especially ya ba, posed a serious social problem for Thai society Some recounted stories about the drug epidemic in their communities and their effort and participation to make the communities free f rom drugs. A few aggrieved people, at the beginning of the war, felt indifferent toward the policy since they did not have any involvement with drugs until they were caught up in the war on drugs. After they or their loved ones were accused of drug crimes almost all of the aggrieved agreed that the state authorities did not proceed as the aggrieved expected given th eir understanding of Thai law. Instead, the authorities turned the gun to those who were innocent. The problem was not the policy, but how som e police carried it out. Sanans comment represents this perception. A police team shot volleys of gunfire into the car of h is son (and his sons friend). His son was disabled and 5 years later died in jail because of the injuries. Sanan was not sure wheth er his son took drugs (ya ba) since the son did not stay with Sanan during his teenage years. The police searched the car and claimed that two tablets of drugs were found. However, with 10 bullets fired by the police officers into one car having no deadly weapons, Sanan thought the police clearly overreacted and deliberately killed his son (and his sons friend). Consider his comment. 1 I am indebted to Felstiner, Abel and Sarat (1981) for the conceptual framework of naming, blaming and claiming.

PAGE 126

126 Interviewer: Before what happened to your son, what did you think about the war on drugs? Sanan: Good. I liked it. I thought it was a good idea to wipe out drugs. But when something happened to me like this, I think they [police] were not seriously cracking down on drug dealers. The real drug offenders were not suppressed. Only drug users were taken. In my community, there are many drug traders. They are still doing a drug trade. [They are not caught]. Only abusers are arrested. Sometimes, some were framed for taking drugs and arrested by the police. (Sanan/AM4/pp. 92) Jais comment is another example illustrating the unusual and violent practices of law enforcement against ordinary citizens. I think the policy of the drug war was very good but it did not train the state authorities to have a higher mind than that of general people. They should be able to know right from wrong. T he policy was good but not the practice. Thus, the policy did not achieve its declared goal. Now, drugs are still rampant as usual. The real drug dealers were not arrested. They [police] arrested [others]. Several [innocent] people were arrested. So, the drug epidemic was never comp letely eliminated, I think. (Jai /AM6/pp. 21) In these quotations, Sanan and Jai identify or name the problem as one of violent law enforcement against people who did not deserve it. The following conversation with Jan dara and her husband also confirm s that law enforcement violating peoples rights and liberties w as the real proble m. Interviewer: Before your sister was [accused], what did you think about the policy of the drug war? Jan dara s husband: Good. We liked it. Everyone liked it Jan dara : At the strawberry farm [where she works], in that time, those who took drugs disappeared. Drug users have no place to buy drugs. Interviewer: After what happened to your sister, what do you think about it? Jan dara : For me and my sister we like the policy of Prime Minister Thaksin. What happened to us is not his fault. It is his followers. Also, it is our bad luck to meet the bad police who worked for a reward or who sought only personal benefits. (Jan dara/AF6/pp. 30)

PAGE 127

127 Undeser ved V ictims Some aggrieved people expressed that if the violence had not happened to them or their loved ones, they would not have a problem with the war on drugs. In other words, the war itself with its violence was not seen as problematic by some of those who were most directly affected. They focused on the fact that victims did not deserve what happened to them. For example, Pachara accepted that some level of violence was necessary to deal with drug offense s, but s he thought it should have been done to only the r ight persons. Interviewer: Before something happened to your father [killed], how did your feel about the use of kha tad ton? Pachara: Before my father was killed, I were not sure whether they [the gunmen] inquired into the matter of drug offense s [that were committed by] the victims. Sometimes, the suppression of drugs needs to use tough means, but they should do more investigation for the exact information. I hadnt thought it would happen to my fath er (Pachara/AF6/pp. 143) Chana and his wife lost the ir daughter and son -in -law during the war on drugs. The young couple was shot dead shot in their heads. The police concluded that they were part of the biggest drug ring in the region. Their properties, therefore, were all confiscated the next day. However the Division Special Investigation (DSI) found that the story of the local police was not true at all. Chanas wife expressed her feeling that I want revenge. [but] my daughter, if she was guilty, I would never [be] mournful for her (Chana/AM6/pp.163) The most extreme comment on this point is that of Kitti. His father was shot dead at home in front of many people, but no one in the community dared to be a witness about it. Interviewer: What do you think about the war on drugs? Kitti: I do not like it be cause the innocent people were killed. If they are truly guilt y I feel nothing. I think that most people killed we re innocent What makes me feel hurt is that they [police] should have gathered information until they were sure that it was this person actually dealing drugs. [They should] also e xamine first what properties [were involved] The sudden shooting [without the exa ct information] is not correct. (Kitti/AM6/pp. 139 140)

PAGE 128

128 For many who were directly affected by the war on drugs, the problem was one of poor law enforcement practices. The problem was not about the violence per se, but it was about whether it was imposed on the appropriate victims, the true drug offenders. The Community and Fear Community Support for Violence Only four of the 18 aggrieved people who were interviewed reported explicitly that their communities clearly understood their grievance and believe that they (or their loved ones) were not involved with drugs as charged by the polic e and/or labeled by the media. Of the four cases, one respondent had a relative killed and the others were themselves falsely charged for drug offense s. Their neighbors were dominated by fear so that no one, except close relatives, provided assistance ( e.g., as a witness for the aggrieved) or showed visible sympathy. For these four respondents, the position taken by those in their communities towards their grievance was not an accident. In all four cases, the killed person and the falsely accused were all community leaders who were kn own well by their communi ties. Anyone coming to their defense would have linked him or herself to someone accused of being involved with drugs in a very public way. Danai was framed by the local police and was jailed during court proceedings for five and a half years before the Co urt of Appeal found him not guilty. His observations make this point well. Interviewer: When you were [named] as a drug dealer did the villagers believe that you were framed or did they believe you were innocent? Danai: They believed the truth that I did not [pursue] any drug trade. But they did not dare to help. Only my older sister and my brother came to help. Others did not dare to be involved because the police threatened that if anyone came to be involved [as a witness, for example], they would be tre ated like my wife. They [police] did a lot of verbal threats. [His wife tried to help him prove his innocence but she was framed as a drug dealer and jailed for several months before the court found her not guilty]. (Danai /AM6/pp. 172) While most of the a ggrieved (14 of 18) were not community leaders, they reported that their communities, in that time of the war, tended to believe that they or their loved ones were

PAGE 129

129 involved with drugs they accepted the label of the police and/or the media. Bornphan, for ex ample, perceived, in that time, that the community presumed that guilt lie not only with her deceased sister and brother in law (whose killings were labeled kha tad t on ) but on her whole clan as well. Interviewer: In that time, the incident was [reporte d] in the newspaper, labeling it as kha tud t on. How much did it affect you? Bornpan: Yes, there was broadcast on local cable news and several newspapers [carried the story]. Interviewer: Did it affect your effort for justice? Bornpan: Of course, there w as a rumor in the community that my whole clan do drug trades. I heard it myself and someone told me. Sometimes, I felt [people] looked at us like they hated us. (Bornpan /AF6/pp. 44) In addition, most of the aggrieved reported that their neighbors held t he attitude that, i f [the accusations were] not true, they would not be killed (Chana /AF6/pp. 158). Some even thought that a hundred people except for a few might think we did it [a drug offense ] (Ja ndara/AF 6/pp. 32). Consider the following reflectio n from Srisook, whose house was searched during the war even though she insisted that she used to be one of the most active community members trying to make the community free from drugs. Interviewer: How did the police search affect you and your family? S risook: People havent wanted to be associated with me. Hey! This house deals with drugs. Ive stopped participating with the community to do public activities. One of my friends who joined a seminar for the White Community [free from drugs] spoke biting ly with me that Hey, without trash, dogs would not shit! [a Thai idiom akin to t here's no smoke without fire] I felt very bad because it seemed they already judge me as wrong. In that time, I felt very pressured. I looked like a mad person. Those who wer e not done like [I was] did not know how I suffered. My neighbor came to ask me, how much I paid the police. I told her that I did not spend even a penny [to get free from any criminal charge]. She responded to me; Dont lie to me! When the police came in ones house, money needs to be paid to them. You know. [She points to the house opposite to hers]. That house spent a lot of money to get free. So, you see, people thought I paid the police. (Srisook /AF6/pp. 5859)

PAGE 130

130 This victim felt that the community p resumed her guilty; otherwise, her house would not have been searched for drugs. Srisooks comment highlighted the well known relationship between police and money in Thai society. The response of he r annoying neighbor rings true. As discussed in the previ ous chapter many Thai people get accustomed to using money to receive benefits or favors from the police The following comment of Jan dara whose sister was accused by the police, provides more evidence of the distrust of those named in the war on drugs a mong their neighbors and other citizens. It is lucky that my sister won the courts case. Otherwise, people might think she was a drug dealer. Even herself, she also swore to me that she did not really do it [trade drugs]. She was afraid that I would not believe her because we would meet each other [only] twice a year. She spoke repeatedly; I did not do it. Help me! She spoke that [while] crying. (Jan dara/AF6/pp. 32) The other interesting theme raised during conversations about the community reaction was how little the community recognized the an guish felt by the respondents. Their neighbors and other citizens knew and tended to believe that the accusations were true. However, all of the aggrieved reported that their sufferings during their fight for justi ce and the consequences of the ordeal were rarely known by others in the community. Srisooks comment is a good illustration of this point. [Around one year after the incident, Srisook got a paper from the National H uman Rights Commission (NHRC). It confir med that she was officially not a drug dealer; her name did not appear on any list of offenders in any of the relevant state agencies]. Srisook: I went to the local police station. I shouted in front of the police; On the day of the search, all people kne w about it. But on the day I am announced innocent [by NHRC], I hav e only a single 4A paper sheet. I will make a copy and paste it on every electricwire pole! Interviewer: During your fight for justice, what was the understanding of other people? Srisook : They didnt see. I walked alone to the local police station. No one knew how hard I struggled [for justice]. No one came to ask me to excuse them for misunderstanding. Ah!

PAGE 131

131 People knew all about the search, but when I receive the certification of innocenc e, not many people talk about it. No one mention about it Oh! She is fairly smart. So, t hose who have the similar experience like her should ask her for advice You know no one [thinks like that]. (Srisook /AF6/pp. 5859) The aggrieved had no one but clos e relatives with who m to share their experiences. Even more distant relatives tended to believe the worst and did not want to be associated with the accused. Neighbors wanted to have little to do with those who were accused; they feared guilt by associatio n. People did not want to be involved with the drug accused families because they feared that they, too, could be accused. For example, Chana and his wife observed that others had no idea about their struggles for truth and for repossessing forfeited prope rties; p eople feared being implicated. This became obvious when they traveled to lodge complaints with various state agencies (in the provincial city and Bangkok). In his wifes words; Some relatives who we had not contacted for a long time thought it [the accusation] was true. Many relatives of mine were afraid that I would bring a problem to them when I asked them for accommodation [during the trips explaining the truth to several state age ncies]. (Chana /AF6/pp. 166) Blaming the Blamers The aggrieved refe rred to a variety of caus es leading to their grievances. Most of the respondents raised multiple causes of the victimization throughout the interview. Some were provided as direct responses to victimization questions, but others were raised as a part of th e conversation elaborating other comments or observations. What follows illustrates the range of reasons that the aggrieved provided to explain what happened to them. Rumors Some aggrieved people referred to a conflict with others in the community that le d to their being named and accused. They believe that some people in the community provided bad information to the relevant state authorities. Often times, a rumor would be spread throughout the

PAGE 132

132 community before the killings or the official search and ar rest occurred. For example, Rattana acknowledges that people in the community had spread rumors for a long time that her mother and step father were drug dealer s. They were killed during the war on drugs. Interviewer: What do you think why were your paren ts killed? Rattana: It might be because my parents were thought to be drug dealers. People rumored for a long time. I think it might be some people [in the community] gave information to the officers. (Rattana/AF6/p p 129) Later, during a conversion about the justice she experienced, she returned to the cause of her parents victimization and blamed the state officers for that. If they were killed at another time [not in the time of the war], I would think it was a normal murd er. Actually, it was rumored [ fo r] years that my mother ran a drug trade. But for several years, no one came to take her life. But they both were m urdered during the war on drugs. I could not help thinking it was definitely done by the state officers. In the time of the war on drugs, I could not help thinking in that way. (Rattana/AF6/p p 1 32) When rumors circulated during the war on drugs, the eventual victims often contacted and/or reported themselves to the state authorities to check whether their names were on the official nam e lis ts (the black lists). Kitti s father was rumored to be a drug dealer in the community so he went to the police. He succeeded in clearing his name from the list by giving the explanation to the district officers. His success, however, was short lived; his l ife was taken later on that day. The district officer told my father that his name was on the blacklist. Therefore, he, accompanied by my uncle who was a village assistant of another community, went to see an assistant county officer to clear his name. The assistant c ounty officer got his name off the list. He gave confidence to my father; Uncle, dont worry anymore. On the same day at 3 p.m., my father was shot dead [at home shortly after celebrating his successful trip with a small drink of alcohol]. My uncle who took my father to see the assistant county officer then fled for his own life. On the funeral day, my fathers colleague [who worked in the same office] did not dare to join the ceremony Only close relatives came. (Kitti/AM 6 /p p 135) Conflict w ith the P olice or Influential People Some aggrieved people recalled stories that they or their loved ones had a conflict with the local police or local politicians. Bhornpan, for instance, claimed that the killings of her sister and

PAGE 133

133 brother -in -law partly derived from having conflicts with local police officers. She accept ed th at her brother in -law had a red hot temper. In the course of running his business, he or his employees often received petty law citations from the police. Previously, he had big argume nts with the police officers who charged him or his employees with things like violating traffic laws. On the day of the killing, he and his wife were called to the police station to resolve a charge again st one of their employees. After having a big argum ent with the police, they were shot dead with hundreds of bullets on their way back home. A clean and nice package of drugs was found in their car not affected by the barrage of bullets or bloods Then, their properties were all forfeited the next day. Ano ther striking example came from Namtips interview. She got in trouble with the local police officers by lodging a complaint with several state agencies about their abuse of power. The local police officers framed her husband as a drug dealer and arrested him. Two months later, she was arrested allegedly for belonging to the same drug ring. However, they later were freed by a courts judgment finding them not guilty. Guilt by A ssociation Some aggrieved people guessed that a cause of their trouble might st em having a relative who was a drug offender. For example, the local police came after Danai; Danai believed this was because his nephew was a drug dealer. He accepted that his nephew was a drug dealer, but Danai insisted that the drugs had nothing to do w ith him. In this area, the big drug dealer is [he mentions the specific name]. He is my nephew, killed [not long before Danai was arrested]. If he was a drug dealer, so am I? (Danai/AM6/p p 169) The association that led to a presumption of guilt could be based simply on having the same last name as an offender. Chana, whose daughter and sonin law were shot dead with drugs foun d in the car, recall ed that the local police officers put in the investigating record that the deceased

PAGE 134

134 were members of a drug ring The story was more convincing when the police officers claimed that the deceased joined with a known offender who had the same last name. In fact, according to a later investigation by the Division of Special Investigation, the claimed off ender never knew the deceased. They were not only unrelated, they were complete strangers. An Embarrassment of Riches Some aggrieved people related their victimization to rumors in the community about their unexpected wealth. For example, Rattana recalled that people si mply concluded that her mother might run a drug trade beca use she had a new pickup truck together with one old si x -wheeler At the same time, h er mother also rebuilt the house. In fact, Rattana was her mothers surety for the banks loan. Therefore, in add ition to being depressed with her mothers death, she felt very worried about her mothers debts for which she, as her surety, must be responsible. Chana and his wife, among the others, also cast the blame for the killing to the rapid rise in wealth of his daughter and sonin law. In that time, not many people in the community knew how the spouses got that money, so they heedlessly concluded that the spouses made profit from a drug trade. When ordinary people had too much good fortune, people could label their wealth as being the product of trading drugs. Heres how Ladda made sense o f her husbands victimization. At one place in the interview, Ladda clearly blamed the village community as contributing to her husbands murder. Note that the Thaksin governm ent used the village community to compile lists of people in the community who were involved with drugs. The lists were widely known as blacklists; they would be submitted through a bureaucratic line of command to the district and provincial offices which are under the control of the Interior Minister. Interviewer: [W] hy [do you think] your husband was killed? Ladda: In the village, there was a village community [a representative of village r s drawn from a variety groups]. Before my husband was killed, one of my husbands close friends gave us notice that we were richer than usual. In that time, we had a six -wheel truck, a

PAGE 135

135 small sedan, and a Toyota pickup truck. They were all used cars, not new. We had some money so we purchased some land and built a small gas station. Some of money came from borrowing at interest. We resided in a rural village so we [stood out], seemed [more] outstanding than others were. Actually, we were kind of diligent people. I took extra work after office hours. Our money was never spent extravagantly. We had saved money all the time. (Ladda/AF6/ pp. 122) Police with F alse Information about the V ictim Several aggrieved people pointed to the police officers possession of wrong information about themselves or their loved ones as a cause of their problems. Jai, a community leader, was arrested with drugs supposedly found in his house. He claimed that the drugs did not belong to him. Finally, the court found him not guilty. He guessed that, among the other tings, the police officers might h ave obtained wrong information about him because he was not familiar with the police officers who arrested him. [T]he officers did not know me and I did not know them [either]. They might not have intended to frame me. They might have gotten some wrong information about me, so they framed me as such. Although they came to know later about me [not being a drug dealer], they could not stop what they [started]. (Jai/AM 6 /p p. 18) Jan dara whose sister was arrested with drugs allegedly found during the house se arch, provided another example of this cause of victimization. My sister has never had a history of involvement with drugs. I think the police officers might have gotten wrong information about her. They claimed that my sister had a lot of money flowing in and out i n the bank account (Jan dara /AF6/p p 31) Policy Targets and Reward Incentives Several aggrieved people explicitly blamed their plight on how the federal policy was im plemented starting at the top. They pointed to the police officers mission, wit h its official targets, during the war on drugs. They were able to relate what happened to them or their loved ones to the broa de r context of the war on drugs. Chairoj provided an example. His comment reflected the understanding of many aggrieved people about the war on drugs and the practices the police officers used to wage it.

PAGE 136

136 Interviewer: In that time, did the police deliberately frame your father [for possessing drugs]? Chairoj: It derived from the war on drugs. It seemed the police officers had to ma ke a target [by arresting] at least 5 persons [for each jurisdiction]. Otherwise, it might affect their career. Interviewer: how did you know that? Chairoj: My uncle is a police of ficer and he was transferred to another police station. Before my father was arrested, [Chairoj pauses and jumps to the next sentence]. The other people at my hometown also encountered arrests in the same manner [as my father did]. They got jailed and talked to each other about this. (Chairoj/AM6/ pp. 150151) In her interview, Pa chara decried the local police officers who labeled her fathers murder as drug related even though no drugs were f ound at the scene. She deciphered the practice of the police officers within the context of the war on drugs. In her words; Interviewer: Why were many people who were killed in that time often labeled as drug related murders? Pachara: Some police officers just looked out for a benefit [a work record of waging the war]. It seemed easy in that time to do so. If the killing was thrown into this is sue [of drugrelated killing], it would fall outside of questions [about justice]. (Pachara/AF6/p p 145) Although people provided a variety of causes for their grievance, all of them blamed police officers in both implicit and explicit ways. Several aggri eved provided narratives throughout their interviews that related their particular grievance to local police officers behavior. They believed that the police officers perceived that they could wage the war on drugs a nd act with relative impunity. The prio rity given to the war by official government policy, the targets that were set, and the various legal practices (many of which departed from the black letter law) combined to permit and encourage local police officers to make or accept false accusations ag ainst those labeled as drug dealers. Once the false accusations were accepted, there were few constraints on what the local

PAGE 137

137 authorities could do, which included killing innocents as is best illustrated by the con struction of kha tad t on. The aggrieved att ributed their victim ization to an array of causes. Their attributions indicate how the broader social context contributed to their understanding of the abuses during the war on drugs. Most aggrieved people blamed both specific people in the community and t he community in general as contributing to their sufferings and for seeing it as somehow deserved. Claiming a Possible Justice The aggrieved who were interviewed had to come to grips with what happened to them. They also had to come to grips with what t hey could do about it. Some avenues for relief were cut off others they knew little about. The fear of reprisal constrained their choices and influenced their actions. They were left searching for a possible justice rather than absolut e vindication and j ust deserts. Distributing a Lot of Complaints The aggrieved expressed a variety of reactions and responses about their grievance s and those they blamed. Most of them reported that they sought advice from their relatives, friends, employers, supervisors and even the local state authorities. For those whose loved ones were killed, they all lodged a criminal complaint at the local police station as it is a usual procedure for a murder case. However, all of them recognized that they had little hope the police o fficers would provide justice. Some aggrieved people recalled that they we re called and interrogated by the local police officers not about what happened to their loved ones but about drug related criminal behaviors of the deceased. While the criminal inve stigations for the murder cases were l eft undeveloped (attributed to kha tad t on), the police emphasized establishing the drugrelated criminality of the deceased (to permit the kha -tad t on attribution and to pursue property forfeiture).

PAGE 138

138 Not one of the agg rieved in this research consulted NGOs to pursue justice. All aggrieved people, except Pachara and Rattana, reported that they lodged a complaint to or visited several state agencies. Pachara tried to avoid lodging a complaint to any state agencies connect ed to the police. She only went to the National Human Rights Commission (NHRC) because she thought it had no connection with the police. Rattana only lodged a human rights complaint with the NHRC because she had no idea where to go for the justice, after h er mother and step father were killed in their home and drugs were found the re. Interviewer: What agencies did you make a complaint to? Rattana: I lodged a complaint to only the National Human Rights CommissionI did not understand law. I didnt know. If n o one gave me a recommendation, I didnt know how to make [a complaint]. I had no idea. I didnt know which ways to go, whom to visit and where to ask for help. I didnt know so I did not make [more complaints]. (Rattana /AF6/pp. 131) Other aggrieved people who visited and/or lodged complaints to several state agencies also reported that, at the time, they did not know exactly about the power and duty of the agencies they visited. The experience of Ladda illustrates this point we ll. Laddas husband was shot and killed at home; it was labe led as a drug related killing (kha tad ton ). Ladda was a middle ranked civil servant, working at local office She visited and lodged a complaint to several state agencies without a clear knowledge of what to do or what to ex pect. Like several aggrieved people, she initially hoped that the bureaucratic agencies might help her so she took a chance. Consider her following conversation. Interviewer: Why didnt you pursue justice from normal criminal procedures through the police and the court? I mean why did you make a lot of complaints to other state agencies? Ladda: I just did it in random ways. If I thought where I could ask for help, I just went there. In that time, I saw the bureaucratic system as the first resort. I watched TV advertising about the agencies [where] I could make a justice complaint. Then, I visited them. Sometimes I had no idea about them. I even visited the Administrative Court but the court official explained to me that it [my grievance] was not [under the j urisdiction of the court]. ( Ladda /AF6/pp. 122)

PAGE 139

139 Experiencing Bureaucratic Loop of J ustice Most of the aggrieved lodged similar complaint s at many state authorities. They wanted higher agencies to examine the truth about what happened and to review the use o f power by the local police officers. However, the respondents experienced a bureaucratic runaround rather than justice. Complaints submitted to higher a uthorities did not stay there. They followed the bureaucratic line down ultimately to the local agency for review, that is, the local police station. When the local authorities finished their examination, the result would be proffered upwards through the same bureaucratic line back to the same higher agency the aggrieved made the complaint to in the first p lace. That agency then reported the finding to the aggrieved to complete the bureaucratic loop. The real examiners (the local police officers) often concluded that the complaints were unfounded. For example, Jai lodged a complaint to the Royal Thai Police, the highest organization of Thai police, asking for a review of the procedures employed by the local police officers to fram e him as a drug offender. He was later interrogated about his complaint by other police officers colleagues of the police officers with whom he had a problem After the review the Royal Thai Police concluded that the local police officers accusing ( framing ) him acted in compliance with law. Other aggrieved people lodged c omplain ts with the Ministry of Interior, the Provincial Gove rnor (Damrong Dharma Center), or other state agencies They also encountered the same runaround as Jai did which seems to be a self -perpetuating loop of the bureaucratic justice Consider the following separate interviews of Ladda and Chairoj. Interviewer : Do you know how the Royal Thai Police examined your complaint? Ladda: The Office of Royal Thai Police would pass down the complaint to the Provincial Police Region. The Provincial Police Region would submit it down District Police Station and then [down] to the local police station. The local police station would set up the police

PAGE 140

140 officers to examine the complaint and then submit the examination result upwards [through the same line] to the Office of Royal Thai Police. Then, the Office of Royal Thai Polic e would notify me of the result of [the review]. (Ladda /AF6/pp. 122) Chairoj: [ I] complained to the parliamentary [Committee for Police Affairs]. It sent out my complaint to the police. The police officers who examined my complaint were from the local poli ce station. They knew each other [the examiner and the named officers]. They would not help me, of course. I also made a complaint to the National Counter Corruption Commission but it passed my claim to the Provincial Police Reg ion 3 and then to the Distri ct Police S tation. Then, the team that examined my claim also included the local police officers. I am very disappointed Interviewer: What did you want [from making complaints]? Chairoj: I wanted the examination of truth. If my father did it [possession of drugs], I had no problem. But they [the state agencies] always concluded that what the police officers did was lawful. ( Chairoj /AM 6 /pp. 152153) Pursuing Human Rights Justice through Declaratory C laims Because of the way in which the sample was selected a ll of the aggrieved people who were interviewed had lodged complaint s with the National Human Rights Com m ission (NHRC). None of them knew exactly about the power of the NHR C when they made their claims. They would learn that its judgments had little tan gi ble benefit for the most part. Although the NHRC issued many judgments indicating the governments violation of rights during the war on drugs, its decisions have not been effectively enforced. Kitti, for example, recall ed that his mother went to the pol ice station to get compensation as indicated in the NHRCs judgment from the local police station. However, the police officers told her to go back home and wait until the killer was arrested. He accept ed that the killer would never be arrested by the poli ce (after a ll the murder was explained as kha -tad ton ). Rattanas experience also illustrates how powerless a judgment of the NHRC was. At first I was very happy to receive the letter of judgment from the National Human Rights Commission. All troubles wo uld be got rid of and I would get all properties [confiscated] back. I was crying in that time because I thought it [the judgment] came to save me. But until now, almos t a year, Ive got nothing. (Rattana /AF6/pp. 131)

PAGE 141

141 Rattana lodged a human rights complaint with the NHRC in late 2003 but she just received the judgment in 2008. Although the judgment has not accomplished anything concrete or practical, she, at least, felt that the NHRC had not left her alone without hope. Several other aggrieved people also learned about the unenforceability of the NHRCs decision, but they also thought it was better than nothing. For example, Pachara expressed that the most desired remedy was to punish the killer. But without other ways to get any justice, the NHRCs unenforceable decision was better than nothing. In her words; Interviewer: Are laws currently enough for you to protect your rights or remedy the injury you got? Pachara: In fact, it is impossible to remedy what I lost. But it is still better than nothing. Nothing could substitute my fathers life. (Pachara/AF6/p p 147) Before that, she insisted that the NHRCs decision at least helped declare that her father was not involved with a drug ring; it refuted the label applied by the police and the media. Interviewer: What did you get from making a complaint to the National Human Rights Commission [NHRC]? Pachara: At least, I think, there was someone to help confirm that we are innocent because it [NHRC] provided a letter notifying relevant state agencies about our innocence. (Pachara/AF6/p p 14 5) Pacharas comment signifies the importance of the human rights claim beyond the ordinary concept of enforcement. In fact, the human rights action transformed what some would see as a self -serving claim into a meaningful truth, although not one that is truly effective A ll aggrieved people who were interviewed struggled for some form of justice by presenting their truth claim to the bureaucracy and National Human Rights Commission (NHRC). They were ill -equipped to assert their claim in legal language against the official version of the local authorities. Consider Chairojs short comment.

PAGE 142

142 Interviewer: By making claims to several agencies, what di d you use to fight for justice? Chairoj: I used truth. I did not have legal knowl ed ge at all. (Chairoj/AM6/p p 154) The truth that Chairoj spoke to is the truth about the innocence of his father who was never involved with methamphetamine (ya ba). This is a bare, unrefined truth. The aggrieved people who were interviewed had to articula te as best they could what happened as they pursued justice. The following is another example of how ill -equipped they felt. Interviewer: Do you have some legal knowledge [to make a complaint to several agencies]? Namtip: No, I dont. I have only confidenc e about our innocence [hers and her husbands]. I made a complaint to ask them to [establish] our innocence. (Namtip/AF6/ p p. 175) Given the lack of legal sophistication, it is not surprising that several aggrieved people lodged complaints with several stat e agencies and the National Human Rights Commission (NHRC); they were looking for someone who would examine what happen ed. Agencies other than the NHRC usually rejected thei r unsophisticated truth claim, sending them through the bureaucratic justice loop before accepting the legal and official ve rsions of the police officers. The NHRC d i d not ha ve the same bureaucra tic structures and procedures. It processed their claims wit hin the human rights framework. By making human rights claim s the aggrieved people also participated in establishing a human rights record at two levels. In each particular case, the facts established could be used as a declaratory weapon to resist the label applied by the state agencies and to raise the prospect of a human rights viola tion. Across cases, the broader fact pattern established the systematic nature of human rights abuses. Recall from the literature review, how making human rights claims is thought to contribute to the creation of a human rights legality. Within a human rights framework, the aggrieved can talk about what happened to them as human rights violations in their own words rather than having to use the legal framing that is required in domestic law (and

PAGE 143

143 which puts those who are less sophisticated at a disadvantag e) Their collective stories transcend the mundane facts of what happened to each of them in isolation. The human rights framework and procedures allowed them to escape the bureaucratic loop that characterized t he domestic Thai legal system which they percei ved The aggrieved people reported using the declaratory power of their NHRCs decision in a variety of ways. The declaration could help in tangible ways, for example, when dealing with the Narcotic s Control Board or other relevant state agencies, and in t heir own community. Pintip spoke to how this human rights legality could help. Interviewer: [From your] experiences with the war and justice, does it make you have a better understanding of rights and justice? Pintip: I understand more about them. This organization (National Human Rights Commission) provided the justice and examined the truth in that we have no involvement with drugs. It could detect directly [and make available] the facts. This greatly helped me. Its decision, although it couldnt be enfor ced upon the relevant state agencies, helped me a lot about [confirming] the truth. It made me more confident. At least, I submitted its decision to the Narcotic s Control Board [NCB]. I think the NCB might read it because the NCB called me to explain again about the forfeited properties. I think the NHRCs decision helped me a lot in this point. That is, I could use it as a principle to claim rights that I could rely on. (Pintip/AF5 /p p 60) In this conversion, Pintip understood the conventional concept of u nenforceability of the National Human Rights Commission (NHRC)s decision but she strategically applied its declaratory power in creative ways. However, not all aggrieved people applied the NHRCs decision in m eaningful ways like Pintip did. In conclusion, the aggrieved people recognized the injustice they perceived from the war on drugs. However, the problems of violence and property confiscation were not necessarily the driving reasons that led to their complaints. The gut issue was that they or their l oved ones did not deserve to be victims. They blamed both the community and the authorities for their plight. Most of them lodged complaints to several state agencies and to the NHRC The

PAGE 144

144 bureaucratic justice of agencies other than the NHRC rejected their truth claims and ratified the actions of the local police officers. Within the existing Thai justice structure, the invocation of the NHRC caused the truth claim to be processed into the universal framework of human rights at two levels. Across cases, it c ould be used to define the state practices as human rights violations. Although the declarations of the NHRC were largely ineffective for the individual cases, some aggrieved people could use them strategically to counter the official labels applied by the local authorities and other bureaucratic agencies in which their truth claims went nowhere up and down the bureaucratic loop

PAGE 145

145 CHAPTER 7 PEOPLES LEGAL CONSI OUSNESS TOWARDS DOME STIC LEGAL PRACTICES The previous chapters described legal practices used in the war on drugs and how claims were constructed among the aggrieved. The aggrieved became conscious that their rights were violated and that they could seek justice. However, their rights struggle centered on establishing the truth about what happened an d asking for help from the bureaucracy rather than entering into the civil and criminal legal processes to make those they blamed accountable. The declaratory claim of rights that agencies like the National Human Rights Commission (NHRC) offered were not m eaningless in that winning such a claim transformed what happened in to a human rights issue Winning such claims could be used strategically against the state authorities to clear records, to secure the return of seized property, a nd to pursue certain bene fits. The declarations, however, did little to hold those responsible accountable. The aggrieved were discouraged from pursuing their claims against those responsible for abuses through civil or criminal legal actions despite their wanting some kind of jus t deserts. What emerged from their interviews was an understanding of the practice of domestic criminal justice in Thailand during the war on drugs. Perhaps what was most striking about their legal consciousness was the absence of a developed sense of the rule of law where all citizens had standing a nd no one was above the law. Rather their understanding was that the polic e constituted law unto itself. The locus of power (legal and extra legal) lay with the authorities who could mak e and break law with impu nity. The people were powerless, without voice, even invisible in the legal realm. Moreover, domestic law was viewed as being depen dent on connections and money. The legal consciousness of those who were aggrieved by the Thai war on drugs did not separate domestic law from the per sons who held legal positions. Gaining access to or influencing those persons was deemed to be beyond the means of ordinary people.

PAGE 146

146 To a large degree, the aggrieved did not pursue civil and criminal legal actions because they had l ittle ap preciation of the rule of law. Even when they could articulate the rule of law, they denied that it applied to Tha i law during the war on drugs. Actually, law should control the state officers as well but [in practice] it controls only people (Pa chara/ AF6/p p 149). Several themes emerged from the interviews that demonstrated the absence o f the rule of law. One important theme was that the locus of Thai law was in police office rs the police could create law. Given the climate of impunity, that tra nslated into making law work in any way the officers wanted without being accountable so long as the official targets for the war on drugs were met. A corollary of this theme was that ordinary people were powerless in the domestic civ il and criminal legal systems. They were invisible and had no voice with which t o persuade or exert influence. Part of that powerlessness was exacerbated by the role of money and the need for conn ections in domestic practices. Indeed, one of the themes that emerged from the int erviews with those aggrieved was how the rule of law was supplanted by money and connections. Of course, cutting across all three themes was the fear of reprisal. Police were a law unto themselves in part because people felt powerless due to the threat of reprisal. Moreover, an important way to reduce that threat was through money and connections. Given the shared understanding about reprisals, notions of the rule of law were unlikely to be incorporated into the legal c onsciousness of the aggrieved. Police as the Locus of Power They Were Above the Law All the aggrieved people in this research blamed the police officers to some degree for their grievances. They often raised similar themes about the police officers. They agreed that it was difficult to challen ge their power because the police officers were too powerful. It was nex t to impossible to challenge police abuses when they did not use law at all when they worked outside the legal system completely and attributed their actions to drug dealers as was the case

PAGE 147

147 with kha tad ton. The aggrieved were conscious of the prospect of reprisal, which allowed the police to operate from two positions. The police were the recognized locus of legal power as they created and applied law but they were also acknowledged as occupying a position of being above the law. The police officers have power and they can use their power in any form and by any means. They dont think that [legal] power is above them. They stand above law. (Saijai/AF6/pp. 75) The understandings of the a ggrieved people were shaped by how law wa s used by the police officers. As Kitti (AF6/p p 141) stated: Law cannot be relied on[because] the state officers hold law The aggrieved understood law in a broader sense to mean that the state office rs and law were the same thing. Interviewer: What does justice depend on? Saijai: Its subject to the police officers Theyre able to create law (Saijai/AF6/p p 73) Saijais experience was telling in regard to the position of police in legal consciousness. Her son was framed by the police officers as a drug abuser. The police officers claimed that her son confessed to the use of drugs for four months. Later, she learned that her son was beaten to get the confession. A few days after his arrest, Saijai took pictures of the bruise s and marks on her sons body. She also had him take a urine test. She gave the test results to the police to prove that her son did not use drugs. The police officers took all the documents from her and later changed the charge fro m abusing to possessing drugs. The police exercised the legal power and they could prevail even in the face of contrary evidence. As Saijai (AF6/p p 74) pointed out: [The police] got the power [the law] sides with them. The aggrieved had learned first -hand about e xtra legal exercises of power. Extra legal exercises could also take the form of repr isals. The prospect of reprisal was clearly part of their legal consciousness during (and after) the war on drugs. Chana explained it this way:

PAGE 148

148 I do not fear the ordinary criminals as much as I fear the police officers because they have gun s that can be used at anytime. The ordinary c riminals, after they commit crime s just run away But the police officers are here with us everydayThey have ability to fabricate a [convin cing] story, which others can read, to make us [seem] guilty of crime. (Chana/AM6/pp 162) Perhaps Srisook (AF6/ p p. 61) conveyed the fear most graphically: People could not keep from peeing on themse lves when seeing the police! But the others shared her concern. Saijai (AF6/p p.73): If they trump up a charge against us, how do we resolv e it? Jai (AM6/ p p. 20): [The police] have the capacity to create false evidenceT hey can do anything [to you]. Jan dara (AF6/p p. 27): [W]eve learned a lesson: if we ris e up for justice, we might be killed or crippled. Kitti (AF6/p p. 138): [I]f its about the policeif we spoke something about them too much, I would be afraid they would make a counter attack on me; I fear this retaliation even now [ye ars after the war o n drugs]. The police were the law the law was not an independent source that constrained or checked police authority in the minds of the aggrieved. Moreover, the aggrieved did not experience law in ways that allowed them to say t hat no man was above the law. Most of the aggrieved dropped their efforts to pursue just deserts because they feared reprisal. Their fear was not just random or individualized because its source was embedded in the power structure. The aggrieved chose to lump it; they conscious ly internalized the suffering to prevent more trouble and to protect themselves. Pacharas comment depicted the concern. Her father was shot dead bu t no one dared to be a witness. I want to do more [for the justice]. The problem is that my family is fearfu l. They fear getting in trouble. My mother also reminded me that the more we do [for the justice], the more we would get in trouble. It would never end. ( Pachara/AF6/ p p. 147) Pacharas mother, a rural woman, understood what could happen if they chose to s truggle beyond the declaratory relief they had obtained from the National Human Rights Commission

PAGE 149

149 (NHRC). It helped to know when to stop pursuing the justice to prevent exposure to perpetual (or repeated) victimization. Several aggrieved people retreated from the pursuit of criminal justice against their abusers because they discerned that the police had the greatest power when they did not use law at all. Saijais captured this point when she talked about the polices fingers. Interviewer: Whom do you wa nt to be responsible ? Saijai: I want the police officers responsible for itIn addition to a criminal lawsuit, I want to sue them in a civil case [ i.e., tort]. They will dare not to do it again. However, I dont take lawsuits because I fear a bad impact [in return]If the police officers were to come by themselves, I dont fear much. I am afraid that they will employ others because they have a lot of fingers [henchmen]. (Saijai/AF6/p p 70) Saijais metaphor about fingers conveyed the fear about police p ower. Fingers or the polices henchmen were more frightening because these people would not be bound by any law at all. The aggrieved understood that the police had ways to operate above the law. Ordinary People as Powerless They Were U nder the Law If the police were the primary locus of legal power and could operate above the law, then ordinary people must be largely powerless. By portraying the police officers as unchallengeable agents, the ag grieved also cast themselves as powerless. While the police off icers could defend themselves because they served the state, the aggrieved were left as just people pursuing their own narrow interests. They felt they might not be visible to the state. They recognized that they were not in good positions to be able to persuade or convince others, especially in comparison to the police. An equal standing before the law was not part of the way the aggrieved people thought about the legal system. Were Just P eople (Whove been Admonished N ot to Challenge t he Heavens ) In relating her experience, Bhornpan, a simple housewife, captured dramatically the way in which the aggrieved were expected to understand their situation. Bhornpans sister and brother -

PAGE 150

150 in law were shot dead during the war on drugs, their house searched, a nd their property seized. She had been present when her sisters house was searched and one of the officers reminded her not to even think to chal lenge the heavens (Bhorpan/AF6/ p p. 43). Eventually she did challenge the authorities, however, traveling bac k and forth between her hometown and Bangkok to get back some of the confiscated properties. Interviewer: Do you think the fighting with the state officers for the justice is difficult? Bhornpan: Its difficult because they are all in the same side. Were just people. (Bhornpan/AF6/p p 42) Bhornpan did not accidentally raise the phrase about being just people in contrast to challenging the heaven s Actually, she tried to portray the power relations in the justice system; when those on high do something wro ng, people should recognize they are powerless to do anything about it. Chana, whose daughter and son in law were killed put it this way. We are no match for them [police officers]. If an ordinary man killed one police officer, thousands of police officer s would storm to arrest him. If we [people] were killed, they would nt come [ to investigat e ]. We can do nothing. They can write anything as they want. We lose in every way. Its better for us to give up an attempt [for the justice]. Let bygones be by gones (Chana/AF6/pp. 161) Pachara also spoke to the relations of power in her interview. For example, if law regulates the police officers and they dont obey ordinary people dare not to interfere. They [the police] are the law holders. By nature, ordinary people, if they see the police officers, are in awe of them. Moreover, the police officers have power in their hands, if they use that power to cause people suffering, people have no way to oppose. (Pachara/AF6/p. 148) In this quotation, Pachara portraye d police officers as the subjects of law ( i.e., the law holders) while ordinary people were only the objects of law. As objects of law, ordinary people are not only under law but also under the control of the police officers. Pachara went on to recognize t hat citizens could have standing in law at least theoretically. H er understanding of practice, however, was quite different.

PAGE 151

151 Interviewer: In general, [you said] the state officers are the law holders and how about us, ordinary people? Pachata: We have a du ty to obey law. Interviewer: Is it possible for us to use law to protect our rights and liberties? Pachara: I think we can. We can be a law holder. However, as seen in the real world, it seems that law authorizes the state officers but we are [are assigned the role of being] law obedient people. Its like the state officers are entrusted to give instructions and to control us [people]. Actually, law should control the state officers as well but [in practice] it controls only people (Pachara/AF6/pp. 149) P atcharas reflections went beyond her own experience and recognized that in the social structure legal behaviors are socially expected and patterned. That is, law authorizes the state officers to take note of peoples legal compliance or noncompliance On the contrary, people are hardly expected to be able to review the noncompliance of the state officers. Saijai put it this way. Saijai: We are under law. [She laugh ed ]. If they [the authorities] say were right, were right; if they say were wrong, were w rong. Were under them while theyre above us. Interviewer: Then, do we as people have any right to use law for our benefit? Saijai: We have, but it will make us dead tired! To get our rights is very exhausting. But the police have no tired feeling. We wo uld get very tired to win them [our rights]. Its different between them and us (Saijai/AF6/p p 75) Some aggrieved people felt insecure when they talked about the abuse of power by the police officers. They were reluctant to use the language of rights and justice publicly, especially in front of the police officers. Consider the following conversation with Kitti, whose father was shot dead at home by unknown gunmen, a killing the local police labeled as kha tad ton Interviewer: As people, do you think it is hard to rise up [for the justice] against the state officers? Kitti: Its very difficult. If it is a problem between people, its not too hard. But to deal with these guys [the state officers] is very difficult. Interviewer: From your experience, what m akes it hard to do so?

PAGE 152

152 Kitti: Its likewe dont know about law, so we cannot talk too much about it. Interviewer: Apart from lack of legal knowledge, do you have other things that mak e it difficult for the justice? Kitti: Its likeif it is about the poli ce, its hard to say. Likeif we spoke something about them too much I w ould be afraid they would counterattack me [in some way]. (Kitti/AF6/p p 138) Saijai provided a good example of the difficulty in confronting the police because of the unequal power r elations. Her son was arrested early one morning and beaten to get a confession of using one tablet of ya ba. After Saijai brought the hospital s urine -test results to prove that her son was not a drug addict (and presented photographs documenting his beat ing), the police officers changed the criminal charge from use/abuse to possession. She recalled her son asked the arresting plaincl othes policemen to show their ID cards and that the price of claiming his right was getting kicked and punched. The plainc lothes policemen asked to search my son [while he was going out for work]. My son responded that if you are poli ce officers, please show your I D s The police officers told him; You are a crafty man (hau -moh)? Then, [they delivered a storm] of kicks and punches to m y sons face and body. I took pictures of all the bruise marks on him. Then, one p olice officer said to my son, In a second, you will know what charge you will get. Youll want 10 tablets [of methamphetamines] and be jailed forever, wont yo u? (Saijai/AF6/p p 63) In Thai society, hau -moh is a negative social label generally used to describe people who skillfully deceive others to further their own interests, especially in matters relevant to law. The police labeled Saijais son as hau -moh because he tried to raise himself to a level where he could assert his legal rights and challenge the power of the police officers. He was uppity and did not know his place. In practice, he did not have enough standing to make a simple, legal request, o ne that the police officers should have respected given black letter legal principl es.

PAGE 153

153 We re Not Visible to t he Authorities All of the aggrieved who lost their loved ones during the war on drugs decried that the police officers did not pay much attention to the investigation of the murder; they could dismiss it by criminalizing the deceased. Several aggrieved people expressed that the state was not interested in their grievances. Chana whose daughter and son -in -law were killed related what it is like to b e just people. Interviewer: [Would it be difficult to arrest the gunmen] if the police officers seriously paid at tention to the case and the witnesses dared to speak the truth? Chana: We cannot use a small piece of the stick to lever age a big log Chana s wife: Were very old and we fear! But for the murder case, I think its not difficult, but we dont want to dig it up anymore. Chana: We are no match for them [police officers]. (Chana/AF6/pp. 161) In this conversion, Chana and his wife reflect ed them selves as the powerless who could not stand in comparison with the state officers. All aggrieved people expressed this feeling in some way. The aggrieved also were aware that the cards were stacke d in favor of the authorities. Kitti, for example, felt tha t law is not used in its full force with the state authorities ( AM6/pp. 136). Bhornpan, whose sister and brother in law whose bodies were penetrated with hundreds of bullets, noted how much the victims had to go it alone: no one gives us the justice, so we have to fight and strive by our selves (Bhornpan/AF6/pp 75) Siajai was more explicit about the ways in which law protected the state officers, while people were left to their own devices. Saijai: [ W ] e have to have money, a good lawyer and evidence. The service lawyer at the court used to discourage me [saying] that the drug crime case was hard to win. He suggested that I give up and accept defeat. But I did not. Interviewer: Yeah. I understand what you are talking about. You had to find a lawyer to def end yourself, while the police officers had the public prosecutor

PAGE 154

154 Saijai: The police officers lost nothing. Its like they work for the government, but people have to find their own lawyer. We are under the law, while the police officers are above it. The y have a good defense lawyer [public prosecutor ]. They are the agents of the state. They have [legal] knowledge which people dont have. People have to find money and go into debt. This is inequality! We have to find the defense lawyer by our own cost. No one helps because it seems we are not a person of the state. Its different! People, whether they are right or wrong, have to fight for themselves alone. If they dont have money and [convincing] evidence, they get jailed! (Saijai/AF6/p p. 757 6) Our Words a re Not Convincing A rule of law model suggests that all parties come to the ba r of justice on equal footing. That was not the conception of Thai law that emerged from the interviews. Recall from an earlier chapter that the human rights professionals noted that Thai law operated with a working presumption of guilt so that denying guilt (or saying no) was expected by those in the justice system. Of course guilty people would claim they were innocent. The words of the aggrieved were not convincing. The inte rviews of the aggrieved revealed another shared explanation for why their g rievances were not convincing. Almost all of the aggrieved people complained of the capacity of the state authorities to create official documents. In all the cases the polices i nvestigating records established the abuse of drugs or dealing in drugs. The public prosecutor s complaints were generally well written and see med to lay out accurate claims. Even some of the aggrieved spoke about how persuasive the language and logic wa s in the official documents. Namtips experi ence provided an illustration. Her husband was accused by the local police officers as a drug dealer. She lodged complaints to several state agencies. A few months later, she was arrested and accused as being par t of her husbands drug network. After being jailed for about six months, the court found her not guilty because the witnesses that police named did not come to the court. The public attorney did not appeal the courts verdict. I also think that they [poli ce officers] wrote a good story about me. It said I sold drugs to children and I was forced to be a drug pusher by my husband. They made a good story and

PAGE 155

155 in a logical wayI am still stunned how they wrote like that. They didnt identify exactly who those c hildren were. Their witnesses didnt show up at the court. (Namtip/AF6/pp. 175) Cha nas wife, who lost her daughter and son -in -law during the war, was still surprised at the time of the interview about the local police officers investigating record. The d eceased were linked to the biggest drug -dealer network in the region. The police officers made the story more convincing by associating the deceased to one drug offender who had the same last name. The police officers claimed that they observed the behavio rs of the deceased for a long time. Later the National Human Rights Commission (NHRC) and the Division of Special Investigation found that the story about the deceased was false. The drug offender who had the same last name as the deceased never knew them. Chanas wife acknowledged that the story made up by the police officers seemed logical and convincing for people who did not know the deceased personally. Interviewer: When those who are not familiar with the deceased read the police officers investigati ng record, do you wonder how they will understand the story? Chanas wife: They would be enraptured by the story. It is in very good logic [things] are reasonably connected [to each other] The reader would think that if it were not true, no one would have come to kill them. (Chana/AM6/pp 162) In this quotation, Chanas wife indicated the fit between peoples general perception ( e.g., if not true, no one would come to kill them ) and the polices well -written record that seemingly documented involvement in a drug network. Therefore, the violence perpetrated on the deceased was in keeping with societal expectations at the time. Note that the general perception of people presumed that the violence had a reasonable cause. The killers would not have been motiva ted to kill if the victims had done nothing wrong. The documentation allowed the victims to be blamed for the violence done to them.

PAGE 156

156 Saijais comment also affirmed the pervasive nature of the legal practices used by the authorities. Interviewer: Do you t hink in that time it was hard to struggle for justice? Saijai: It was difficult. In that time, what the officers said was convincing because they had documents and drugs [as evidence]. E veryone like d to believe so. Because they [the police] did not have any conflict [problem] with my son before, they did not have a motivation to frame him. They never kne w each other. I think people would think like this. What the police sa id was very firm and reasonable. While I was listening to the ir story [at the courts trial], I definitely thought that my son would not be free d! [She burst out with a laugh]. (Saijai/AF6/p p 71) Saijai noted that unless people thought that a prior conflict existed between her son and the police, there would be no reason to doubt the offi cial version, something that can also play out in court. Saijai accepted that the police officers were skillful in making convincing statements. At the time of the interview, she still doubted whether those statements could be overcome. Saijai: [A]t the co urts trial, the judge asked the police officers to give a statement. It was very convincing if you listened only to their accusation. Interviewer: You were also convinced, werent you? Saijai: Oh! It was very convincing. They said like they found my son behaving suspiciously. Thus, they approached him [to search him] but he fought back. However, the court was still just and I also got some knowledge from the trial. (Saijai/AF6/p p 6 5) The official document gained power from its status of being official O n the contrary, ordinary people cannot make their own official documents. Some aggrieved people recognized that their words and evidence seemed less convincing when put against those of the officers. Jais comment illustrated this point. He still remembere d the day he was searched and arrested at home with drugs found somewhere in his house. He strongly denied those drugs were his, but one policeman simply responded that Its okay if you think they are not yours. We can prove them at the court (Jai/AM6/ pp 11). He was imprisoned for almost two years before the court

PAGE 157

157 announced him not guilty. Thus, among other things, he accepted that it was hard to resolve the charge because the polices official documents seemed more trustworthy. Interviewer: Do you have other causes that make your fight against the state officers for the justice difficult? Jai: Because they have capacity to create false evidence. They can compose the document claiming that you are involved with drugs by saying groundlessly that their undercover agents gave them information. Then, they can do anything [with you]. Were just ordinary people. We dont know law. Our written do cuments seem less convincing. (Jai/AM6/p p 20) One of the ways that Jais defense countered the official record was t o provide the court his drug -clean history for the previous 10 years. He related what he learned from others he met in jail regarding how hard it was to fight the allegations. Interviewer: If as part of your life you used to take drugs but stopped it for a long time, do you think you would overcome the polices accusation like this? Jarun: Many people in the jail had an experience like that. They chose not to fight to free themselves. Interviewer: Why do they not fight for justice? Jai: Because their vill age headmen would not guarantee their behaviorsSome prisoners told me that they used to take drugs [in the past] but the drugs on the day of arrest were not theirsBut if they used to be involved with drugs even in the past few years, they would choose not to fight for justice because no one guaranteed their behaviors. If their life history was reexamined, their words and evidence would not be convincing at all. (Jai/AF6/p p 19) Money a nd Connections w ere Part o f Law Money and connections should play no role in justice acc ording to a rule of law model. That was not the picture of law presented by the a ggrieved who were interviewed. They saw the need for money and/or sen -sai (connections) to deal effectively with the police and other officials. Their c onsciousness of domestic law incorporated important roles f or both money and connections. The pursuit of justice was entangled with both.

PAGE 158

158 The Role o f Money All of the aggrieved raised, both on their own during conversation and in response to the direct que stions, a variety of themes concerning money and justice. They saw money as an inherent feature of the practice of Thai law. Money was viewed as being integral to domestic law and justice. Interviewer: Do you think law is just? Srisook: Nope. Interviewer: Why? Srisook: Because whatever people do [to pursue justice] always requires money. (S risook/AF6/p p 61) A previous chapter of this dissertation reviewed the experiences that the aggrieved had with the role of mone y in domestic legal practices. The salie nce of legal gratuities and exchanges within the domestic law framework illustrated the extent to which lower level a uthorities acted with impunity. These experiences became engrained in the legal consciousness of the aggrieved; some became less nave abou t Thai justice. Jan dara expressed this transformation. I never thought to give them [the arresting police officers] money in exchange [for help] because she [my sister] didnt do anything wrong. (Jan dara /AF6/p p 34) Recall that eventually Jan dara and her family learned the lesson well and were able to influence the outcome for her sister by providing gifts (sea crabs) to the prosecutor during trial. Others recognized the normalcy of legal gratuities (kaa naam ron -naam -chaa ) in the Thai justice system. In fact, the legality that would be central to a rule o f law model seemed secondary. Rattanas words captured this well. Interviewer: Do you think the cars return for the exchange of money is legal? Rattana: I dont k n ow. I think its normal. It is kaa -n aam -ron -naam -chaa. I am glad to get the car back (Rattana/AF6/p p 130)

PAGE 159

159 The aggrieved also developed an awareness of the financial costs of pursuing justice. Economic constraints precluded many of the ordinary people of modest means from seeking accountability from those responsible for the abuses. Most of the aggrieved perceived money as one of the main factors that influenced them to abandon their pursuit of just deserts. Reca ll some of their observations. Chairojs father wanted to accept a plea and tol d his son not to waste your money anymore (Chairoj/AF6/p p. 152). Saijai (AF6/pp. 69) lamented that only people suffer and waste both money and [jeopardize their] health. Perhaps Pachara best summarized what the aggrieved thought about the role of money. [I]t is said that the more they [ordinary people] struggle [for justice], they more they get in t rouble and the more it costs them They might not have the abi lity to stand firm. Although it is believed that money does not matter, it actually [does]. (Pa chara/AF6/p p 146) We Have No Sen -S ai In a rule of law model, justice would not be dependent on one s connections or who one knew. The aggrieved did not see Thai law operating in this neutral way. Rather, they saw the need for money and connections to deal effectively with the police and other officials. Some explicitly raised the issue of having no sen -sai (no connections) as an important factor that hind ered their pursuit of justice. The Thai word, sen -sai (connections) is well understood among Tha i people, especially, when dealing with the poli ce or the bureaucratic agents. By having no connections in the bureaucracy or with the police, it was hard for the aggrieved to get what they wanted from law and state authorities. One aggrieved person expre ssed that he needed sen -sai so he could lobby the state agencies for compensation for his damages and to challenge the police. Laddas experience and words illustrated the importance of sen-sai. Lack of sen -sai discouraged her from fighting for justi ce. Laddas husband was shot dead at home and the murder was labeled as drug related killing ( kha tad -ton ). She lodged a complaint to several state agencies including the Crime

PAGE 160

160 Suppression Division, the special -police unit dealing with the serious crimes. She tried to dig up the truth about the killing until she realized that her efforts were futile and dangerous because she had no sen -sai. Even though she was a midranked civil servant at a local state office and another relative was a police constable, she did not have the necessary connections. Ladda: [W]hen I lodged a complaint to [many] state agencies, I wanted them to examine the truth and declare to the community that our family had no involvement with drugs. This is what I wanted. For the issue of investigating the crime and arresting the killer, I think that is very difficult. Interviewer: Why do you think its difficult? Ladda: Very difficult! My husbands relatives are just ordinary people and my relative is just a police constable. I am just a [ middle ranking] civil servant. We do not have sen -sai. No one can extend a hand to help us. (Ladda/AF6/pp 119) She then placed her experiences within the context of Thai society where sen -sai is always necessary. Interviewer: Cant the usual criminal justice help you? Ladda: It cannot. The Thai society is like this...With my background, I dont have power to force the police officers to work. I think it is very difficult to force them to work [for me]. I am not a renowned personI often called one pol ice officer of the Crime Suppression Division, to whom I lodged a criminal complaint, asking about the progress of the investigation. He wa s officially responsible for my case. [One day] he said, L et me tell you frankly. Your case is only so -so and youre not a big shot person. Your case is hard to pay attention to What he said struck me dumb! He said it to me like this! Were just people who were killed and thrown into the problem of drugs. I also contemplated what he said if compared with the Prime Min ister Thaksins policy on the war on drugs, my problem wa s like a toothpick. Its impossible to arm wrestle with his policy. (Ladda/AF6/p p 119120) Without sen -sai (connections), she saw herself as powerless in both the criminal justice and bureaucrati c justice systems, although she was a civil servant in the bureaucracy. She was reconciled to accept her powerlessness because of the war on drugs was a more important social interest. She internalized her pain and had to suspend her pursuit of justice.

PAGE 161

161 Pa chara also affirmed that sen -sai was a pervasive practice when people had to deal with law and justice. Interviewer: As we are people and we have law to protect our rights, are people equal? Pachara: We must be equal before the law [by principle]. In fac t, we are not equal. Discrimination still exists. The poor and the rich would be treated differently. For example, if one knows a police officer or has a relative who is a police officer, that police officer would take side s with him. (Pachara/AF6/p p 146) Chanas wife noted that if she had a conflict with her neighbor, she would consult the police officer she knew first before letting things proceed into the formal justice system. She admitted that [w e] have to ask for help from a powerful figure; i ts i ndispensable (Chana/AM6/ p p. 162). At the time of the interview, Chana and his wife were still seeking sen -sai to get more compensation from the government for the death of their daughter and sonin law. He promised to give 20% of the benefit if that per son could help him lobby successful. Interviewer: How do you feel when there were many reporters coming to interview you, including me now? Chanas wife: I feel likeAh! Will they come to help us? I wonder how they will help us. Chana: I think if anyone c an help me [to get higher compensation from the government], I will give him 20%. I would like to find someone to lobby [for me or] I will get nothing. (Chana/AM6/pp 165) The results were strikingly different on that rare occasion when an aggrieved perso n had sen sai. Thamrongs brother was killed, which the police officers attributed to k ha tad -ton (drug related killin g). He recalled his initial unpleasant experience with the police officers. The police officers did not want to do the autopsy which was required by law. On his own, he was too powerless to force the police to do their job. Therefore, he asked for the help of a well known person, Uncle Sam. Uncle Sam was the secular leader of a Buddhist g roup to which Thamrong belonged and used to be a nat ional politician as well. Uncle Sam directly contacted a high -

PAGE 162

162 ranking police officer and the Provincial Governor, after which the local police officers quickly did his brothers autopsy. In his words; Interviewer: When you contacted the police officers, di d you get good help? Thamrong: No. They didnt give me a good cooperation. They did nothing I tried to ask them to take my brothers corpse for an autopsy to the hospital, but they declined to do so. At first, they asked me to cremate the corpse without d oing an autopsy because they had a lot of [similar] cases to deal with. They would do paper work identifying the cause of death laterI decided to call Uncle Sam for some suggestionsLater Uncle Sam helped successfully coordinate with the police officers [ and the Provincial Governor] to get the autopsy [and to remove his brothers name from the blacklist]. (Thamrong/AM6/ p p. 103) As Tham rongs experience illustrated, sen -sai can be established; it does not have to be inherited Sen -sai can come from bei ng in the same student cohort at a university or from working in the same profession, for example. Sometimes sens -sai can be purchased. Recall that Jan dara tried to create sen -sai with the public prosecutor prosecuting her sister by having her relative s bring gifts such as sea crabs to him during the trial. No matter how the connections were formed, sen -sai was engrained into the legal c onsciousness of the aggrieved. It was part of law as they saw it.

PAGE 163

163 CHAPTER 8 THE PRACTICE OF HUMA N RIGHTS This chap ter explores the ways in which the idea of human rights was invoked in the interviews. The focus is on the legal consciousness that developed so that the transnational human rights framework could be applied to the abuses during the war on drugs. Human rig hts professionals were the most important translators of the international idea of human rights into the local settings. Three schemas have been extrapolated from the interviews to show various ways in which developing a human rights consciousness can come into play: a supplemental schema, a progressive schema, and a transformative schema.1 Although these schemas are tied to this research, they contain dimensions that are consistent with contemporary understandings of the relationships between law and socie ty, including as regards law and social change (see Ewick and Silbey 1998; Kostiner 2003) The substantive notion of these schemas borrow s heavily f rom Merrys (2006 a; 2006b ) arguments about the need to vernacularize human rights ideas at national and local levels. As such, the emphasis begins with legal consciousness and idea systems rather than other aspects of social structure and culture. The supp lemental schema was the framework that human rights professionals used to translate human rights principles into concrete cases. How did they insert the notion of human rights into domestic legal practices? Human rights professionals applied abstract ideas about human rights to humanize those practices. The supplemental schema was adapted to each individual case to hel p the aggrieved pursue justice. It directly deals with Merrys (2006a; 2006b ) challenge to localize transnational notions of huma n rights int o social practice. It retains a focus on effectiveness (doing something to help the aggrieved individuals) by fitting the effect 1 I am inspired to categorize three human rights schemas by Kostiners (2003) legal schemas for social change (i.e., instrumental, political and cultural).

PAGE 164

164 and presence of international human rights with domestic legal practices. As such, it retains some instrumentality (see Koh 1999) even as it uses transnational human rights to reconstitute domestic law. The declaratory justice victims obtained from the National Human Rights Commission (NHRC) was largely constitutive in that it provided a different way for victims (and others) to m ake sense of what happened and to establish the truth about what happened. It did not alter the reality of what had happened to vi ctims under domestic Thai law. Still, it had some instrumental value for some victims in terms of securing the return of confi scated properties, dealing with the bureaucracies, and re -establishing social relations in their communities. The progressive schema provided a framework to understand structural features of the human rights violations. Human rights violations derived dire ctly from the Thaksin governments policies on the war on drugs policies which enjoyed popular support even as practices systematically violated the rights of people. The idea of human rights was translated as a different set of rules to challenge the dome stic legal discourse. Law was being reconstituted. Challenges driven by the developing human rights consciousness exerted an external force on the Thasksin governments conduct. The United Nations took note; a delegation visited; the main campaign of the w ar was limited to three months (so some instrumental impact was realized). The language of international human rights (e.g., crimes against humanity and state terrorism) shifted the focus away from the people and placed it on the government. The exposure of the Thai practices and violence to an international standard moved the analysis beyond each theory for understanding the individual cases to a unifying framework for understanding the systematic violations across cases. The transnational human rights f ramework for establishing systematic violations had an international standing that provided a source of legitimacy for an otherwise powerless group of

PAGE 165

165 aggrieved a legitimacy that was missing from the individual ca ses. Each individual case could be easily m inimized because each case was officially suspected of drug involvement and each complainant appeared to pursue his/her narrow self interest. The human rights framework resonated with a larger international community as it refocused the analysis on the con duct of the Thai government and isolated it while providing support for the aggrieved who were otherwise largely powerless. The progressive human rights sche ma gave the aggrieved a voice. Its value may have been seen most clearly after the ouster of the Th aksin regime when the new government had to suspend plans to launch a second war on drugs. A developing human rights consciousness helped reframe Thaksins war as involving systematic human rights violations and that newly constituted consciousness eventua lly served to constrain domestic practices. Thai police were no longer free to operate above the law; the same practices could no longer be employed. The transformative schema moved law into society as human rights professionals discerned the social values that lay at the heart of the human rights violations. Thai social values also provided the cover for the impunity Thai authorities enjoyed. Human rights professionals tried to introduce the idea of human rights as an important cultural value which people could draw on to understand the violence and systematic violations in a new light. The framework could create a social space to implant the idea of human rights and transform the social valu es antagonist to human rights. A new legal consciousness could pla nt the seeds to transform society itself. All three schemas cast human rights law as a weapon in social conflict (Turk 1976) rather than as a function al adaptation to secure order. Human rights profession als accepted that developing human rights would eng ender conflict and resistance. Note, however, that the

PAGE 166

166 instrumental implications rely heavily on ideolo gical, constitutive processes. They are consistent with Weberian notions of law and society in that the social meaning people give to idea systems, even if idealized (like human rights), will influence their social action or behaviors (see Lanza Kaduce 1982; Weber 1949) Supplemental Human Rights Schema Law Enforcement as a Problem Human rights professionals focused on the existing legal mechanism as playing major role in human rights violations. As such the y had to use human rights to blunt the domestic practices t hat contributed to the abuses. As discusse d in Chapter 5 human rights professionals criticized the state authorities for carelessly and quickly accusing people of involvement with drugs. The requi rements related to due process were dis regarded with impunity. The use of legal exceptions and of legal loopholes contributed to the widespread violation of rights during the war on drugs. Several human rights professionals clearly indicated that the justi ce system was abnormal paralyzed, turned to other ways and even blind to the atrocities in the time of the war on drugs. However, human rights professionals understood that these problems of legal practice were embedded in the justice system. The w ar on drugs just intensified the degree of the unjust treatment of the law enforcement and reinforced the inequality within the justice system. Samart, a human rights professional who worked for social justice movements among ethnic groups, asserted that j ustice was different for the rich and powerful figures than for the poor and the marginalized. The problem for the ethnic groups is the inaccessibility to the justice system. The poor cannot attain the justice systemThe un just practice is everywhereThe p rison is only for the poorTherefore, the justice process is for the interest of people in the minority [the powerful people]. It is not for people in majority [the poor people]. (Samart /HM4/pp. 16)

PAGE 167

167 Recall the role that money and connections seemed to mak e. That was part of the challenge presented to the aggrieved and the human rights professionals. They had to pursue the claims within the extant system with its differential practices. Santi observed that the state authorities used their power cautiously with the powerful figures but carelessly with rural (ordinary) people. The police officers would be prudent to use their power with those who have economic and political power. On the contrary, ordinary (unknown) people [taa -see taa -saa] would be carelessl y arrested [even without firm criminal evidence]. (Santi/HM5/pp. 40) Some human rights professionals indicated that the problem of injustice also derived from legalistic and organizational traps or the bur eaucratic bite The state officers often utilized various laws and regulations to weaken the peoples ability to challenge their power. Many times, the state officers, especially at the local levels, had recourse to laws and regulations they themselves, sometimes, violated. The point is that many people could not effectively exert their legal claims. People would be easily trapped in laws and regulations. They could hardly escape on their own. Supplemental schema helpe d maneuver out of these traps. Sombat, a professional lawyer who worked with ethnic groups in the North, imparted his experience on this point. The state officers often used law as a responding weapon. People were trapped in such legal responses all the time, such as making arrest, issuing a [trivial] criminal charge .In any struggle against the government, people were stuck in legal traps all the time because the bureaucratic system has law and many regulations that can be used in response to people [to weaken their struggle for the justice]. (Sombat/HM6/pp. 2) Sombat, Samart, and Weerachai shared their experiences to different degrees about how to extricate people (and their properties) from the legal traps (bureaucratic bites). For example, they negotiated with the local police officers for the return of unlawfully confiscated properties and tried to help people gain release on bail before trial (in drug offences). Often times the law enforcement officers violated their own laws. Within the supplemental schema, the problem was

PAGE 168

168 how to get law enforcement and justice people to close the gap be tween law in books and law in action. The human rights perspective dramatized that gap. Human Rights as P rinciple When human rights professionals invoked the supplemental schema, they understood that norms about human rights were abstract and did not inclu de an enforcement power if used alone. Therefore, the human rights idea was mobilized with the existing legal domestic mechanism. Paiwan, a human rights lawyer, expressly acknowledged this issue. The principle is to use domestic law. The declaration [Uni versal Declaration on Human Rights] is abstract. It is just a concept because it has no enforcement power. It is about the concept for the struggle for justice. (Paiwan/HM1/pp. 21) When asked about the relationship between domestic legal practice and the i dea of human rights, Paiwan pointed to the importance of the idea of the universal human rights as the philosophical background for enforcing domestic law in humanized ways. The Constitution is the repertoire for the domestic practice of universal human ri ghts. Interviewer: I understand what you are talking about human rights. Usually, it is understood that the idea of human rights often conflicts with the domestic law. Paiwan : [A]ctually, the domestic law should [ not be seen as] conflicting with human rights principlesDo not forget that section 6 of the Constitution provides that any law conflicting or contrasting with the Constitution cannot be applied. Then, what should be the basis of [legal] interpretation? [ Paiwan chortled in his throat]. The principl e of liberties and freedoms which are human rights must be used as the basis of interpretation...Freedoms and liberties attached to humans when they were born are human rights. The Constitution only ratifies these fundamental freedoms and liberties. Theref ore, when we have to interpret any law, we have to interpret it in the ways that support and protect these fundamental freedoms and liberties. [He chortled again]This is the principle of human rights. ( Paiwan /HM1/pp. 41) Paiwan introduced the familiar con cept of legal hierarchy. Human rights constitutes the most fundamental legal concept that the Constitution articulates as the state law. The Constitution is the highest law of land. Therefore, Paiwan took the accepted position that all domestic laws and pr actices should be in line with the constitutional rules, including the principle of human rights.

PAGE 169

169 Legal interpretation can rely on the universal principle of human rights as the highest authoritat ive source. This important function of the supplemental sche ma for legal interpretation is perhaps most dramatically illustrated in areas where the Thai law is sile nt. Tippawan, a human rights professional whose work focused on equal access to justice, made the point clearly. For torture, for example, we have to re fer to relevant [international human rights] laws [because no Thai laws have a definition of torture]. (Tippawan/HF5/pp. 12) Tippawan spoke at some length about using a supplemental human rights schema in her current work in which human rights principles s upplement and work together with the application of the existing domestic legal rules. Tippawan: We dont go out to demand the state agencies do anything for us, but we rely on the existing legal mechanism. For example, [in a case] the public prosecutor ha s not made the prosecutorial order to the court to conduct the autopsy trial, even though the interrogating police officer submitted the investigating report to him. The pubic prosecutor avoids doing so because the murder involves state authorities [so he does not want the court to review the autopsy]. Interviewer: In this case [to make the public prosecutor do his job], do you refer to the idea of international human rights law? Tippawan: Yes. We do. (Tippawan/HF5/pp. 12) Tippawan noted that if the state a uthorities just followed the existing domestic rules of law, it would not be necessary to invoke notions of international human rights. She recognized that the dom estic laws in the books provide high standards to protect the rights and liberties of people. The problem was that law in action deviated from the black letter laws in the books. Interview: Is it necessary to claim the principle of international human rights law? Tippawan: Its not necessary to refer to the international human rights law at all be cause our Constitution and Criminal Procedure Code are full of justice standards. Interviewer: Its not necessary to refer!? Tippawan: Not necessary. Just use it as a threatening weapon. In fact, if state officers practice in accord with the Thai domestic laws like the Constitution, everything would be just. We have good [domestic] rules. To claim international human rights law is like to

PAGE 170

170 deter them [from deviating from the existing rules] and to remind them that they might be in trouble if they practice ot herwise. (Tippawan/HF5/pp. 7) The invocation of human rights could be applied to specific cases and specific individual state officers who did not act in accordance with prescribed rules of law. Those officers could be reminded that they could face troubl e because o f human rights claims. They could, for example, be the target of complaint letters accusing them of abusing the power; they might encounter protests from various human rights organizations that made their actions and the victims visible; or thei r behaviors might be brought to and reviewed by the Administrative Courts or the Criminal Courts. The human rights professionals saw the supplemental schema as providing a tool within the existing legal mechanism to erect a credible threat that minimized the impunity which authorities otherwise enjoyed. Humanization of the Legal Practice as Strategy Under the supplemental schema, human rights professionals graft human rights principles into the existing legal mechanism. It is a pragmatic strategy that makes use of the law in action, even if the legal practices depart widely from the black letter law or ev en if the law itself is flawed. The human rights professionals who relied most on this schema provided the aggrieved with rights support and legal aid. Most of these professionals operated at the local/regional level; they stood ready to help resolve the legal issues and to provide needed support and resources to the aggrieved people in the communities. They encouraged the aggrieved people to see their proble ms as human rights violations and to pursue claims for justice. During the war on drugs, some human rights professionals advised the aggrieved about their rights and how to make a complaint to the National Human Rights Commission (NHRC) and other relevant state agencies. Some helped the aggrieved write letters of complaint. This research did not identify all the tactics used, in part, because the snowball sampling techniques

PAGE 171

171 yielded local/regional human rights workers who worked only in the North regio n, pr imarily among ethnic tribes people, who were marginalized from the dominant Thai society. The human rights work in this region was probably different in some ways from what occurred in the rest of Thailand. Weerachai, a local/regional human rights professi onal working with the ethnic groups in the North, shared his experience of rights support. He used to visit communities and helped ethnic people write the complaint letters to the NHRC. Weerachai: It took some time for the villagers [ethnic people] to dare to make a complaint. I helped them write letters of complaint. At firstthey did not dare to give me information because they did not know who I was. After awhile, I went back again to help them make a complaint to the National Human Rights Commission [NH RC]. Interviewer: In that time, how did people [ethnic groups] understand the struggle for justice? Weerachai: They knew nothing. They did not know how to fight. Interviewer: Then, how did you tell them? Weerachai: I told them that they should make a compl aint [to NHRC] to examine the truth. I went to talk with them several times until they dared to make a complaintWhen they made complaints, they didnt even dar e to disclose their real names (Weerachai/HM1/pp. 75) Unlike ordinary law work where lawyers wor k with problems that clients present to them, human rights professionals had to first raise the consciousness of the people the aggrieved had to learn about their rights to understand that they had a problem that was justifiable. This made human rights law yers work distinct from that of ordinary lawyers. Pinit, a well known human rights lawyer, put it this way. Human rights lawyers must give knowledge to their clients about their rightsOrdinary lawyers give nothing to their clients. We [human rights lawy ers] will tell them everything. (Pinit/HM4/pp. 31 )

PAGE 172

172 By learning how to understand their own experiences as human rights abuses the aggrieved and hill tribe people could gain some basic knowledge to defend themselves from illegal practices of the state auth orities. Some human rights professionals sought to talk with people during and after the war on drugs to give them enough fundamental legal knowledge so the people could examine the use of power of the state authorities ( e.g., the law on searches and arres ts). Sombat, a local/regional human rights professional, recalled that he asked the ethnic people in the communities to stick together when the police officers came in the villages. They needed to be witnesses for each other during searches and arrests. On e goal of all the human rights lawyers was to bring some individual state authorities who abused their power to justice within the domestic system. For example, Samsen, one of the most active human rights professionals during the war on drugs, stated that he really wanted to have some state officers punished. Actually, we think that if we could bring a few officers to justice, it would set a precedent, deterring the rest of the state officers [so they would] not allow themselves to be lackeys for the politi cians. (Samsen/HM1/pp. 61) To do so, required someone who was affected by the war on drugs to make the individual choice to bring their own lawsuit against specific officers. The fear of revictimization, however, was the main deterrent factor keeping aggri eved people from advancing claims in the domestic justice system. Accordingly, the only way to supplement domestic law was to turn to the National Human Rights Com m ission (NHRC). Interviewer: Why dont the aggrieved people rise up and demand [retributive] justice? Supree: In fact, they were trying, but no ways were available for them. and the society didnt sympathize with their grievances. Several agencies of the state have become part of rights violations and supported crime. The aggrieved could not go to them to ask for help Second, if they tr ied to rely on those agencies for justice, they m ight be revictimized because [these] people would be rocking the boat. (Supree/HM4/pp. 69)

PAGE 173

173 Hill tribe people in the North2 are one of the most marginalized groups of people in Thailand. Thai people in general and the state officers more specifically still hold the old belief that the hill tribe people are involved with drug trade and deforestation. Because of their long-standing marginalization, the hill tribe people feared the state officers. Samart, a local/regional human rights professional working with the ethnic groups, observed that human rights work during the war on drugs tended to be defensive because the affected people were still in the state of fear and th e public was not aware of being threatened by abuses in the war on drugs. Interviewer: Can you tell me about the strategies you use with the issues of human rights violation during the war on drugs? Samart: In fact, our work was rather defensive not progr essive In the end, [it focused on] legal techniques such as the discretion of the judges on bailWe could not move our struggle for justice to a progressive strategy because we could not elevate people [the affected people] to understand their sufferings as a structural problem as we wanted to do. If we elevated our struggle higher than the understanding of people, we [NGOs] would surpass our subjects [people] (Samart/HM4/pp. 19) In this quotation, Samart indicated a limitation of human rights work: what human rights professionals want may conflict with what their subjects perceive they need. To respond to the needs of their clients for legal aid, the invocation of human rights was limited to the supplemental schema. Progressive Human Rights Schema The Oppression by the Government as a Problem In the progressive schema, human rights professionals shifted the unit of analysis and focused on the political action of the state as a whole, not simply on individual state enforcement officers or the specific actions they took. By invoking the progressive understanding of human 2 Hill tribe people referred here are ethnic groups who were victimized during the war on drugs. They are called chao khao in Thai (li terally mountain people). The Thai government recognizes six groups of them: Karen, Hmong, Mien, Lahu, Akha, and Lisu (see Lewis and Lewis 1984).

PAGE 174

174 rights, the war on drugs was elevated to a conceptualization of state crime and political oppression. The policy of the war on drugs became the focal point. All human rights professionals discerned the connection between politics and the policys implementation. Pinits clearly emphasized the political control over the war on drugs. Former Prime Minister Thaksin was different from the previous leaders in that he applied swift rewards and pu nishments to the state officers for their implementation of the governments policy. This exerted very effective control [over the bureaucracy] so his policy was achieved. In the previous governments, intensive policy control like his was rarely employed. That is, if the bureaucratic agents did not accomplish the governments policy, they would not receive any serious backlash. But the policy of the war on drugs provided that if they [the bureaucratic agencies] could not reach a set target within three mont hs, they definitely would be transferred out of their posts. The Provincial Governors and the Police Superintendents were most vulnerable to being discharged. Then, when the officers reported [periodically] the numbers to him, Thaksin would identify [immediately] which provinces did not meet the set target. He pointed out those provinces that did not achieve a target within the assigned time. Several meetings were also held to keep track of the policys implementation and to periodically evaluate which provinces achieved and did not achieve the set target. Therefore, [at the end of the three month policy], all provinces accomplished the set target. ( Pinit /HM4/pp. 37 38) Supree, a human rights professional who was familiar with international human rights campaign, pointed out that the human rights violations directly derived from the policy of the war on drugs and the control exert ed from the central government. It was the policy and not its implementation at the local level that was the bigger problem. As suc h, the abuses were systematic and not simply the errors or excesses of individuals in local law enforcement. [The abuses were not due to] errors with the policys implementation [I]t was a deliberate policy to make these things happen. It was not the err or of the law enforcement either [T]he mistake was to have this wrongful policy [of the war on drugs]. (Supree/HM4/pp. 61) The tight policy control carried an explicit threat to the state officers re sponsible for implementing it. Failure to comply with the war on drugs policy meant reassignment. It al so carried an implicit threat. Failure to comply made government agents vulnerable: they too could

PAGE 175

175 be suspected of drug involvement and labeled as an enemy of the government. Samsen, another human rights lawyer shared his friends experience to illustrate the point. One friend of mine who was a Police Superintendent saw the blacklist which was submitted upwards from the village heads to the District Governor and to the Provincial Governor. He knew one man on the blacklist well. He was very confident that the man was not involved with drugs. However, he dared not to oppose the blacklistEveryone [each state officer] just played it safe by passing [the blacklist along] to higher authorities If he [certified] that the man was innocent, it was possible that he might be framed as being involved with a drug dealer or receiving money from a dealer(Samsen/HM1/pp. 57) Implicit in this quotation, was an understanding about the overwhelming political power of the Thasksin regime, a regime which suppressed all the opposing voices. Recall that people in the community also kept themselves away from the aggrieved people because they feared to be framed as drug offenders. Supree, a national human rights professional, more expli citly referred to political considerations and the relationship between the war on drugs and the political climate of the time. Interviewer: I noticed that during and after the war on drugs, not many human rights professionals came out and voiced against the war on drugsI rarely saw them in the news. Supree: News reporters didnt spread our struggles[Moreover] I considered myself as part of the Democrat Party [the leading opposition party in that time but now the government party], and many NGOs also sup ported this party[In that time, my organization had sent one campaign manager to talk with both Thai Rak Thai Party (the government party in that time) and the Democrat Party (the leading opposition party)]. No one in Thai Rak Thai Party agreed with us [a bout stopping the war on drugs] because they got political popularity[Then] we talked with the Democrat Party, the opposition party, to help [us] resist the war on drugs. But the Democrat Party feared to go against the overwhelming social trend supporting the war on drugs Interviewer: You mean social trend? Supree: Yes because, through the mass media, it seemed everyone agreed [with the war on drugs]. Interviewer: It might be that the Democrat Party feared the loss of popularity with its voters.

PAGE 176

176 Supree: Yes. It feared to lose the political vote. So, as I told you, the politicians were useless to be relied on (Supree/HM4/pp. 64) The progressive schema for understanding the abuses during the war on drugs placed an important focus on the Thaksin government and its policy. That schema, however, also saw that the structural arrangements reached further in to politics and society itself. Neither political party would resist the abuses because of popular support for the war on drugs, and other institutions like the press and media played roles in creating and maintaining the political climate. Several human rights professionals also paid attention to the powerlessness of the victims. The victims and their relatives did not have the socioeconomic and political reso urces to prevent or withstand the abuses perpetrated by the state officers and the government. For example, Kampon, a senior human rights professional, observed that many teenagers were killed in that time. Samsen accepted that many people killed during th e war included small time drug abusers, but noted they did not include the big drug dealers. Moreover, from their field experiences in different occasions, Pinit, Weerachai, Samsen, Supree, and Paiwan explicitly indicated that a lot of ethnic groups were v ictimized. They were often killed in groups. Therefore, the official numbers of people killed during the war on drugs might be underestimated once the ethnic victims are taken into account. Consider the following comment by Paiwan a human rights professio nal, who joined the National Human Rights Commission (NHRC) to investigate human rights abuses during the war on drugs. Paiwan: It seemed the war on drugs succeeded...The problem was the killings were committed audaciously. Its like the killings committe d in the communities were admonishments. No one dared to be a witness. Fearing audacious killings, the real drug dealers just found a hiding place temporarily. [Paiwan laughs]. It seemed the drug dealers disappeared [so the war] looked like a success. Howe ver, most people, from our examination of those who lodged the complaints to the NHRC, came from the marginalized. They did not have a voice and no one spoke for them [to declare] that they were innocent. The most savage thing was what happened to the ethnic groups, known as hill tribe people. Many of them were killed in that time

PAGE 177

177 Interviewer: I didnt see much about their killings in the news reports. Paiwan: It didnt appear much in the news but there were a lot of killingsThey often were killed in grou ps of three, four, five or even six people. They were killed a lot because the old belief [held by the society and the state officers] about hill tribe people as producers and dealers of drugs [ i.e., opium in the past] ( Paiwan/HM1/pp. 22 23) Human R ights as F orce By invoking the progressive human rights schema, human rights legality is used to challenge domestic law practices. The progressive schema sees the domestic law and legal practice as corrupted and politically manipulated to achieve the policy goal s of the war on drugs. In this way, the idea of human rights is used as an external for ce in opposition to the state. It would actually criminalize the state, something which normally cannot be done using a states own law. Kampon and Samen, well known hum an rights professionals, depicted the violence during the war on drugs less as a problem of law enforcement and more of a terrorist -like action by the government. Consider the following comment of Samsen. This is not the problem of law enforcement, but the state itself [the government] was the law violator. It was terrorism by the state. Actually, we [NGOs] agreed with the suppression of drugs. We supported the arrest of suspects in the ways consistent with the due process of law. But we disagreed with the use [and acceptance] of kha tad ton. In fact, the conduct of the state in that time is like state terrorism. ( Samsen/HM1/pp. 54) In addition to applying the terrorist label to the governments intimidating and abusive practices, other familiar concepts of international human rights law were strategically used to reframe the problem from being one of ordinary crime and law enforcement to grave human rights abuses imposed on civilians by their own government. Supreee, whose human rights work has been invol ved with international organization, brought up the concept of command responsibility, linking Prime Minister Thaksin directly to the atrocities.

PAGE 178

178 The style of shooting is not like what general gunmen do. [Supree then talk ed about the dress and hair styles of the killers from which their police profession c ould be easily identified]Therefore, this [the shootings] were violations of peoples rights supported by the head of the government in that time I think this wa s the biggest violation of rights that has ever happened in the country It was different from other violent incidents which were just one time uses of force by the government to suppress anti government protestors. But the war on drugs used violence over and over within the time frame of three mon ths, and then extended it to the end of the year 2003. I would like to state frankly that I dont use the idea of domestic law [to understand the war on drugs] since I am not a lawyer. My background is in political science and I am rather familiar with public international law. I think [what happened was] systematic violations of international human rights law. Its about the command responsibility. The civilians became victims of the state -sponsored atrocity. ( Supree/HM4/pp. 5556) Supreee went on to exp lain how the war on drugs could be understood in the context of international human rights law. [First]We tried to prove that there were a high number of people killed during the warWe had our sister organization to collect news clipping reporting the ki llings daily within those monthsOur sister organization could not complete the task. It got the killing statistics for February only. However, the number of people killed was very high. The pictures of the killings were seen in the news everyday and everywhere. Those killings were described simply as kha tad -ton [killings among drug dealers]. Second, there were reports of the Narcotic Suppression Centre [established during the war on drugs] evaluating the success of the war with the numbers of people arres ted, surrendered, and dead. These statistics would be ta ken into consideration as well. [Finally], it was about the command responsibility. Former Prime Minister Thaksin continuously gave an interview to reporters [justifying] the high number of the kill ings. (Supree /HM4/pp. 56) Pinit, another human rights professional, labeled the violence and killings during the war on drugs as crimes against humanity. [I] think one way that makes people more vulnerable to being killed is to destroy their humanity. Form er Prime Minister Thaksin declared to the public that those people [drug dealers] kill our children. They are not human but the devilThey are not normal like us. This is the usual practice [dehumanization] before employing violence against any group of people [Therefore] those people became the enemy not simply to the government but the enemy to the society. (Pinit/HM4/pp. 38 39) Pinit pointed to the governments logic that the violence against the victims was natural because they deserved to be killed, likening the victimization to what the Nazis imposed on the Jews. How should those people [drug dealers] be dealt with? Their humanity was not left because they were criminals, devils and even terrorists [to the society]. Their humanity was

PAGE 179

179 degraded like this. Its like Hitler labeled Jews as a threat to Germans. They deserved to be killed. The war on drugs relied on the same logicFormer Prime Minister Thaksin marketed [this well]. That is, he used the media to rivet peoples perception to agree that thos e people [involved with drugs] deserved to die. ( Pinit/HM4/pp. 38) Pinit showed the importance of the blacklists. Through the lens of international human rights law, he provided insight into the role they played in identifying the specific group to be syst ematically targeted in the war on drugs. Interviewer: [Y]ouve talked about Nazi and Jews. In my opinion, I think Hitler identified the specific group of the victims. It was Jews. But in the Thai war on drugs, I dont see that group of victims comparable to the Jews [in Germany]. Pinit: They were the drug dealers! Interviewer: Were they classified as specific group of people [targeted for the violence]? Pinit: It does not matter whether those people were the authentic drug dealers or not. The point is to make their names appear in the blacklists first [and then eradicate them and count this as the achievement]. The way to identify them [the victims] is to put their names in the blacklist. ( Pinit/HM4/pp. 39 ) Those on the blacklists were systematically targe ted. The blacklists defined the boundaries of who would be identified and who would be the victims. The government used the blacklists to measure its own success; achievement was accounting for a high percentage of the names from the blacklists. To complet e the set target within three months, the government provided three methods of deleting persons from the blacklists: arrest, extrajudicial killi ngs, or death by other causes. Within the progressive human rights schema, the systematic violence brought about by the governments war on drugs policy was a grave human rights violation that constituted an international crime. Internationalization of the Violence as Strategy The progressive human rights schema sought to internationalize the abuses during the war on drugs. National human rights professionals were more familiar with the international audience than were local/regional human rights professionals. For example, Samsen a national human

PAGE 180

180 rights professional had experience with human rights abroad, includi ng good contacts with several international agencies. He viewed the pressure from the international community as an important factor for human rights justice. Interviewer: Which issues were the most important for you to establish justice? Samsen: At the b eginning, we protested and opposed the policy. Then, when there were many killing cases, we disseminated information to the society continuously. The most important thing wa s to have pressure from the international community. Interviewer: Is this [internat ional involvement] your strategy? Samsen: Many international human rights organizations became shocked about why within just three months there were almost three thousand people killed. ( Samsen/HM1/pp. 57) Kampon a senior human rights professional, recou nted that he reported the mass killings during the war on drugs to Hina Jilani, the United Nations Special Representative of the Secretary General on Human Rights Defenders Kampon: In fact the killings in the Thaksin regime began with the deadly suppression of the village heads, community workers, and NGO [staff]. Around 20 of them were killed. They all were those [ e.g., local leaders and environmentalists] who opposed [outside] political interference and economic power s [that were] deteriorating their local environment or taking the advantages their natural resource s Interviewer: This happened before the war on drugs? Kampon: Yes, it was before the war on drugs. It [eventually reached] 30 people killed. These people had been known in the society [as social activists]. Their killings were reported to Kofi Anans office and Kofi Anan sent Hina Jilani a special representative to Thailand in 2004 [to examine the killings]. When she arrived, she was very shocked to see the long lists of people killed during the war on drugs. [Kampon laugh ed nervously]When she came, I reported the mass killings during the war on drugs to her immediatelyLater, the UN raised 26 issues of human rights abuses to the Thai government [including the war on drugs] I had never seen Thailand like this before. People were killed in a jumble (Kampon/HM1/pp. 1011) The progressive human rights schema identified the domestic law and justice as corrupted by politics at the highest levels of government. Therefore, Kampon saw the importance of

PAGE 181

181 international justice; it was necessary because the domestic justice system could not deal with the leaders of the state. [T]he poli tics [in Thailand] would have [interfered with] the justice system all the time...Its like the countries in the third world that could not deal with the problem of human rights violations in their countries, like the countries in Africa. Thu s, [they need to] rely on the world community for the justice. (K ampon/HM1/pp. 17) The main goal of the progressive human rights schema was to capture the international audience. The use of international human rights labels appealed to the international community more than did the use of more common domestic labels such as murder, homicide, or even the extrajudicial killings. Samsen, a human rights lawyer working at a national level, argued that the human rights campaign put the human rights abuses during the war on drugs under the scrutiny of the United Nations. He expe cted a sentinel effect: if a government in the future has a political view to revive the issues, people will come out and reveal more inform ation [about the atrocities] (Samsen/HM1/pp. 58). He believed that his effort was successful within the context of Thai society where the government had rarely been reviewed by non-state agencies. At least, later governments might think twice before following the same track of Thaksins war on drugs Samsen offers a case in point to support his conclusion. Interviewer : At what level do you think your effort was successful? Samsen: UmmI think it was successful, although no one was punished. Interviewer: In what ways? Samsen: When the Samak government rose to power [in 2008], his Interior Minister tried to follow the fo otsteps of former Prime Minister Thaksin by announcing a second war on drugs. But he could not do it. The failure of declaring the second war on drugs came from many factors. For example, he didnt have personal charisma like former Prime Minister Thaksin. But I think one reason is that the state officers were not confident that if they [pursued] the second war on drugs [like they did the first one], they would not be examined [i.e., by human rights professionals, by international organizations, by the soci ety, etc.]. Even former Prime Minister Thaksin was in the power only five yearsI think the state officers w ould have to rethink seriously several times [before using violence the way the Thaksin regime did]. This issue [the war on drugs] is still on the [ burner]. For instance, this

PAGE 182

182 issue still remains before the UN. The Thai government has not answered to the UN about the war on drugs. ( Samsen /HM1/pp. 58 59) The end game for the progressive human rights schema is to hold accountable those at the highest le vel who were responsible for the policy and the atrocities that grew out of that policy. Pinit, a human rights lawyer, insisted on the principle of no safe haven for a human rights abuser. He wanted to bring former Prime Minister Thaksin to a court of la w so that the charge of crimes against humanity could be examined through due process procedures. Under the principle of accountability, it is possible that Thaksin [could defend] himself against a charge of crimes against humanity. He must defend himse lf against the charge of crimes against humanity in a court having due process. [The purpose is not] to discredit his political life. (Pinit/HM4/pp. 46) Transformative Human Rights Schema Peoples T hought as a Problem Both the supplemental and progressive schemas enc ountered cultural impediments. Recall, for example, that the initial challenge for regional and local human rights professionals was to help the ethnic peoples understand what happened and how they could translate the human rights abuses into ju stifiable complaints in the legal system. A legal consciousness had to be engendered so human rights principles could supplement domestic law to protect basic rights and to pursue remedies. Recall also that the Thaksin governments violence was enabled wit h the help of the media and because of broad cultural support. The transformative human rights schema confronts culture head-on because the problem of human rights violation is seen as being rooted in the peoples thought in the shared ways of thinking and values that tolerated the violence and abuses. Can the human rights consciousness transform the way people think about their rights? An authoritarian way of thinking was identified as an underlying cultural value that contributed to toleran ce of the viole nce and abuses. The people were used to accepting and

PAGE 183

183 relying on the absolute power of their leaders to solve their problems. Pinit, a national human rights professional, made the point clearly. Interviewer: Then, do you think the society tolerates the violence? Pinit: Yes. The society accepts the violence. My understanding is that the society has not accepted the idea of rig hts. Moreover, it also retains authoritarian values. That is, two attributes could be noticed. First, they often see the powerful fig ures as being able to handle any matter for them. They count on others having higher authority because [they think] they cannot handle it by themselves [Second] they favor absolute ways to deal with a problem. The problem must be absolutely eliminated. Thi s is the authoritarian way of thinking. ( Pinit/HM4/pp. 34) The authoritarian way of thinking in this conversation fits well with the social practice of making, finding, and establishing sen -sai (connections ) as discussed in Chapter 7 The aggrieved accep ted that they needed sen -sai to make law work for them. The authoritarian way of thinking also accommodated the leaders and the powerful figures; it invited them to take control over all matters in society including how the society understands the social problem of drugs and how the prob lem should be dealt with. Samart, a regional/local human rights professional, referred to a culture of dependence that led to the monopolization of drug problems by the government. Interviewer: It seems the society didnt decry the war, but rather supported the war on drugs. Do you know why? Samart: Because the society was dominated by a fear of drug dealers. The society was dominated by fear about drug abusers, but the society didnt find ways to resolve the problem throug h participation in the communities Ya ba [methamphetamine] was not only a matter for the police department and the administrative officers. The society didnt realize this point. The society just [tacitly] consented for the police to handle the problem [al one] At the end, the violence was justified by peoples fear against drug offenders. Why didnt people think how to analyze the problem as [one] within the social structure that exists? But they rather blamed drug abuses as inborn [as an individual] trait Finally, the panic over drugs was used to justify the violence of kha -tad -ton [the killings of drug dealers]. (Samart/HM4/pp. 20 21) As several human rights professionals implicitly and explicitly expressed, people accepted violence as a means justified by the end (the eradication of drug dealers). They did not tolerate

PAGE 184

184 the violence because they simply believed the police theory of kha tad -ton, although it was easier to accept the official version than to face the truth about the killings attributed to dr ugs dealers. To some extent, the Thai peopl e accepted some corruption. They certainly knew of the importance of money and connections in law something that predated the war on drugs. Samsen addressed the situation, recognizing that the Thai people did not talk and exchange the facts but used shared taken -for granted feelings to make their judgments. Were [Thai people] like those in a pragmatist culture. The culture emphasizes ends, not means. For example, because it is said that everyone [the state officer s and politicians] always does corruption, corruptions not a problem if he still performs [their duties] well. Actually it shouldnt be like that. The two concepts [corruption vs. efficiency of work] are absolutely in the conflict, but there is a misunder standing about this all the time. Its like we [people] do not talk to each other using academic information or facts but we utilize taken -for -granted feelings. It is a society based on the feelings and beliefs. For example, we often say that there are no poor people among the diligent, or for someone who has wealth, there is no reason for him to enrich himself illegally. Can you imagine!? These are silly conclusions without substance and they are deadly wrong, but Thai society has always thought like t his all the time. (Samsen/HM1/pp. 56) Recall how this tracks with the reflections of the aggrieved, whose neighbors often presumed the aggrieved would not have been framed or had loved ones killed if they did nothing wrong. During the war on drugs and the peak of former Prime Minister Thaksins power, drug dealers were seen as the devils and enemies to the social security. They, therefore, deserved the violence. The cultur al orientation cuts both ways. When former Prime Minister Thasksins power waned, he was labeled as a bad leader and traitor, and the society did not resist the military coup in September 2006 that ousted him from power. Santi put this cultural acceptance into historical context. Generally, the society tends to accept whatever means that can be used to solve a problem quickly. For example, in Sarits time [ 19591963], the alleged criminals [ i.e., arsonists] were shot dead at the spot of arrest. P eople felt that it was worth [keeping order] for the society People accept whoever is capable of eradicating the bad people. Therefore, the social tolerance of the military coup in 19 September 2006, ousting former Prime Minister Thaksin [when he was labeled as a traitor] is not surprising. People allowed the

PAGE 185

185 military to crush the bad Thaksin. I t hink this [cultural orientation ] is in conflict with the principle of human rights (Santi /HM5/pp. 36) After the military coup in September 2006, it appeared that everything former Prime Minister Thaksin did was wrong. The cultural swing did not reflect an enduring human rights principle. The anti Thaksin groups wanted to destroy him politically and society turned to side with the anti Thaksin groups. The political conflict resurrected again in the spring of 2009 when a proThaksin movemen t mounted mass dem onstrations. A transformative schema would modulate the political swings by introducing enduring basic human rights principles applicable across governments and political movements. Supree raised one cultural feature that needs to be considered in any tra nsformative schema. He talked about the role of K arma for the lay Buddhists as the cultural grounding for tolerance toward government initiated violence and abuses. Although he was the only one who talked about Karma, his point of view resonates well becau se Karma is fundamental to Thai society. Although both law and Karma lay out authoritative rules, for Supree, the rule of Karma for the lay Buddhist has a major difference from the rule imposed by the Thai legal order. The rule of Karma is not malleable; i t cannot be bent by other factors, whereas the justice system is malleable and i s influenced by other factors. Recall in the justice system, there is no well developed sense of the rule of law; rather people believe that the legal system is just for some p eople ( e.g. the rich people or those with connections) and unjust for others. As seen in the previous chapter, many aggrieved people talked a lot about the lack of money and sen -sai as determining factors in the justice system. Accordingly, the law does not always punish the bad people. Th at is not an outcome of Karma. Under the rule of Karma for the lay Buddhist the bad must receive punishment. Therefore, the rule of Karma explained what happened to the victims during the w ar on drugs. If some received punishment, then the victimi zation must have been

PAGE 186

186 deserved because they were extremely evil. The official labels and blacklists were much easier to believe given the rule of Karma in Thai society. The point is that Thaksin used the discourse [about the war on drugs] to reinforce the foundational belief of Karma ; that i s the bad had to suffer the consequences The discourse, early on, established the label of drug dealers as devils. They were not just normal devils but the most deadly [kind of] devil becaus e they betrayed the country. If you considered in detail Thaksins use of discourse in that time, there were elements that the society regards as serious [threatening social security]. They [the drug dealers and users] destroyed the country, family and our children. They were the most acutely wicked bastards. Therefore, [because they were so evil] they shoul d receive a serious consequence in return. This way of thinking fits well with the original concept of Thai -style justice in the framework of layman Bud dhists [the rule of Karma]Karma is expected to give prompt retribution. Thaksin took advantage of this so people did not see the violence as the problem because drug offenders were the devils who deserved to die. There was no reason [for people] to be ag itated about that. ( Supree/HM4/pp. 62 63) T o the extent that the rule of K arma for the lay Buddhists dominates their thinking, people will not see the urgency in adopting a rule of law framework. Immutable human rights principles that endure across politic al regimes and societal shifts are not as key to justice as is Karma. It helps explain why the rule of law was poorly developed in the aggrieved consciousness. This may explain why some human rights professionals explicit ly indicated that the society was n ot naive about the polices theory of kha tad -ton (the killings among drug dealers). However, the society was tolerant to the violence because the victims would not have died if they did not deserve it. Recall that some aggrieved people also reflected this point of view. One of the most active human rights professionals working against the war on drugs offered this overview. I think at the beginning of the war, people knew that it might be the officers who committed kha tad ton against the alleged drug offe nders. But they thought those drug offenders deserved to die. This demonstrates the fragile [position of] rule of law in Thai society. Thai people acknowledged that the wrong means [were used] to resolve the problem. Even though those means were illegal, t hey accepted the means to resolve the problem. In my opinion, this method does not actually resolve the problem because the problem of drugs is influenced by many factors, especially social factors which are most important. In addition, this method support s the police state I dont mean that the police become the most powerful. It is the totalitarian state mainly that uses its power to damage

PAGE 187

187 the rule of law we [Thai society] have been building since the political reform in 1997We might abate the drug problem in just a few years [using violence], but in the long run what we have built would be destroyed. (Samsen/HM1/pp. 5566) The police state as defined by Samsen contradicts the idea of human rights. Rights and liberties of people would not be taken into account when the state used its power. Might can become dominant over rights without a transformative schema where human rights is incorporated into (and therefore changes) the larger culture. Human R ights as a Cultural Value By invoking the transformative human rights schema, a legal culture could take priority ov er the political culture. The goal would be to embrace foundational human rights that endured across political re gimes into the culture itself. In the language of a rule of law model, no one could be above the law. Kampon, a senior human rights professional, lamented the futility of the rule of law given the political culture that dominates Thai justice. Interviewer: I understand your point that no one has been brought to the justice. How, then, do es the idea of international human rights law come to help? Kampon: It can do nothing as long as the political leaders [elected or not] do not care about human rights. Moreover, they [the leaders] deliberately violate rights of people. In fact, it has been like this all the time [for Thailand]. Theyve never been interested in human rights. It has already become a political culture because law is meaningless. Then, what happens is that a political resolution counts on violent means [to succeed]. (Kampon/HM1 /pp. 15) The human rights professionals also thought that ordinary people did not see law as the most effective tool to solve social problems. Several human rights professionals pointed to the defects of the justice system as one of the reasons. Pinit, a h uman rights lawyer having experience with long -term legal mobilization, expressed this point. Interviewer: Why dont people favor the normal legal procedures [to deal with drug problems]? Pinit: If you are asking why they do not rely on law, I understand t hat people see the weakness of law. (Pinit/HM4/pp. 43)

PAGE 188

188 Kampon and Pinit argued that Thai culture seems to pay less attention to the law and legal culture than to political and social cultural phenomena. Therefore, the translation of the human rights idea i nto the practice of law itself (as through the supplemental schema) might create no change at all because the major impediment to a human rights consciousness may be society itself. Supree, who is familiar with international discourse of human rights, ref lected on this point. I look at the problem from the viewpoint of the political scientist. I think that whether the [human rights] framework will be adopted depends on the push from the society. Therefore, I try to move the society by working through the m edia and doing campaignsFor lawyers, they need to ratify the relevant international covenantsI think how much the process of ratification is delayed depends on the social tendency. [Without a change is society], it [human rights ratification] would be le ft uncompletedFor example, the process to ratify the torture convention is going very slowly. Also, we do not have the definition of torture in any Thai laws. Its possible that the society still tolerates the practice of torture [among the state officers ] (Supree/HM4/pp. 6869) Supree showed concern for the direction of the change and whether he could influence the tendency toward social values supportive of human rights. He thought that the institutionalization of international human rights instruments was insufficient to change social (and domestic legal) practice. Therefore, Supree and other national human rights professionals (i.e., Pinit, Kampon, Paiwan Tippawan, Santi and Samsen) made efforts to dispute publicly the view that the victims deserved to die. The idea of human rights had to become more than merely a diffident opinion opposing the abuses and violence. A public campaign was necessary to transform ways of thinking. Consider the following experience that Pinits related. Interviewer: Have y ou ever been threatened [for your stand against the war on drugs]? Pinit: Never. But just one woman called [to] reproach me. ... She asked me whether I had a daughter. She said, what do you do if your daughter has become addicted to a drug?

PAGE 189

189 You would let the drug dealers hurt your daughter like this, wouldnt you? (Pinit/HM4/pp. 36) The woman accepted the war against drugs to prevent more harm. She strategically drew out the daughter as the weak victim of the strong predators, drug dealers, to try to con vince Pinit that the violence was appropriate. In fact, the victims of drug dealers (especially for ya ba) are portrayed as children, the future hope of the nation who are still weak in social experience. Because Pinit understood the cultural perspective s he took, he did not d irectly challenge her opinion. He nudged her slightly to contemplate another different point of view by asking her how muc h killing should be tolerated. Pinit went on to indicate that the most important base for human rights is the ac ceptance of different opinions. [If one did anything against the war], he would be viewed as part of the same group of drug dealersTherefore, he should be eliminated too. The way of thinking is to expel different standpoints. The current Thai society stil l reflects this way of thinking. This is a very important issue. It [opposing viewpoints] is the crucial foundation of human rights. Can people accept different point s of view ? How will they live with those having a different opinion and belief?...(Pinit/H M4/pp. 36) Samsen, another national human rights professional, also argued that human rights violation s are embedded in the society. Therefore, he reflected that the human rights idea would be implanted in the society when the society begins to accept and respect freedom of thought which, he thinks, is always absolute beyond any limitation. Interviewer: This is the final question I will ask you. It is said that the idea of human rights lacks the power to change society What do you think about this statement ? Samsen: I think if we want a society of sustainable development, civilization, and peacefulness, human rights idea is very important. It needs time because the viewpoint of Thai society towards human rights is imperfect. Thai society has not appreciated human rights enough. It [the human rights principle] has still not been translated [effectively] into the society. Interviewer: Do you mean to the practice of peoples daily life?

PAGE 190

190 Samsen: Yeah, in their daily lives. Interviewer: It seems you are talking ab out peoples perception. Samsen: The respect for anothers opinion is an example. Freedom of thought is the most fundamental basis of human rights, right? Its not just freedom of speech. Freedom of thought is the absolute right. The freedom of speech and writing can be limited under some circumstances such as in a state of war. They might be censored. On the contrary, thinking is the absolute rightThe Thai society has not accepted this point [freedom of thought]. Therefore, we still confront each other [a bout holding different ideas]. (Samsen/HM1/pp. 6162) Samsen spoke to the process of translating human rights idea into the society itself. He recognized that this would need time and acknowledged that the most fundamental features of human rights run de ep er than the laws themselves. In addition to time, Samsen suggested that Thai society needs the social space that allows for different perspectives, different ideas, to co exist as a matter of the social norms (and not as a matter of law or politics) Spati alization as Strategy By invoking the transformative schema, the appropriate strategy was to try to persuade the society to make room or open a social space for the idea of human rights. National human rights professionals took on this role. They wanted to challenge the societal ways and values that supported the abuses and violence, but they recognized the difficulty of the transformative task. For example, Tippawan, a human rights professional, accepted that her efforts seemed to be less than successful. Interviewer: Then, what are your strategies relevant to the issue of human rights that you involved with? Tippawan: It is all about the information. We [NGOs] publicized it [the abuses]. We issued statements and held some seminars [talking about the war on drugs]. But we did things in very limited ways because the trend of the society at that time did not favor us [but supported the war on drugs] Interviewer: Yeah. Ive seen in newspaper some statements and a few conferences against the war on drugs. How d o you think people in that time perceived the role of human rights advocates?

PAGE 191

191 Tppawan: They knew almost nothing [about us]. Also, we rarely had a chance to speak [to the public] (Tippawan/HF5/pp. 10) Pinit took the point further. It was necessary to spea k against the violence and abuses during the war on drugs, not simply just disseminate the information, but to create a public space to make room for the discourse. We [human rights professionals] have to point to the principle [of human rights] no matter whom we speak against or how we would be condemned... Otherwise, no one stands up [against the violence and abuses]. This is both the strategy and the duty [of human rights professionals]. We have to rise up to protect the principle [of human rights] and n ot tolerate the violence. Of course, we might be pressured by others, depending on how we speak. We have to think in strategic ways as well. We should not let the aggrieved people [e.g., the victims or their relatives] speak about the violence if they will be in danger. We have to think about this in strategic ways. Not everyone can speak. Some can but some cannot because they have different social spaces and roles. (Pinit /HM4/pp. 45 46) Pinit also used the word dialogue to insert ideas about human rights into society. In his words; We tried to prevent [everyone in] society from feeling the same way. There must be someone to say that it [the violence] is not the right way. At least, there must be a [social] dialogue or argument [about what is right and wr ong]. (Pinit/HM4/pp. 46) The transformative goal of the human rights professionals, however, was a difficult one to achieve. Tippawan decried that society not only agreed with the war on drugs but also marginalized human rights professionals. Most human ri ghts professionals realized their marginality. For example, Kampon recalled that in that time he brought some relatives of killed victims to talk at a few TV shows about their grievances. Later those TV shows were ordered to close down and he was not invit ed to go back on television for almost three years Santis comment captured the marginality of NGOs. They were criticized by the business sector and the politicians as the obstructionists of getting in the way of national prosperity. Thaksins government a ccused NGOs of being the broker trafficking others povert y. His government was antagonistic to NGOs; the more popular he was, the more marginalized the NGOs and human rights professionals became.

PAGE 192

192 Santi: [ I] n that time, Thaksin was very popular. It didnt matter you could consult any poll. NGOs were the organizations that should be abrogated [from the society]. Since labeled as the broker trafficking others poverty NGOs became the least trust ed organization. Interviewer: So, NGOs couldnt do their work, r ight? Santi: They could not work because the social trend rejected NGOs. In addition, the international sources of funding announc ed [a reduction in funding over] the next five years At the beginning of 2002, they gradually reduced financial support for the Thai NGOs In that time, the popularity of NGOs began to recedeThaksin didnt pay any attention to NGOs and NGOs didnt get much support from the society. The media also turned away from NGOs. No one answered when called by NGOs! Instead, they exalte d Thaksin as a wealthy man who devoted himself to the country Interviewer: So, I didnt see many NGOs come out [against the war on drugs]. Santi: Some of them were trying to. However, most of the affected people did not dare to claim their rights through NGOs or even the National Human Rights Commission because of fear. [People in] NGOs themselves feared being killed as well because in that time [Thaksins regime], several [local] environmentalists were killed. ( Santi / HM5/pp. 42) The transformative schema was a hard sell because it did not stop by saying the law was corrupted. It called for remaking society as well. The ultimate goal was to transform peoples thought in the ways that integrated the idea of human rights into daily social (not just legal) pra ctice. As Samsen suggested, human rights needed to become part of the ways of life or culture. To move toward the transformative human rights schema, Samsen highlighted the process of learning from social practices as a crucial step for implanting human rights into society. It is normal that we have to learn from concrete cases. It is learning from the practices in the society. For example, in Latin America, there were many people who disappeared. The relatives of the disappeared assembled to make justice claims. Because they assembled, the concept of human rights grew up. They claimed for their loved ones who disappeared. They might not have understood the concept of human rights. However, from their struggles, they came to understand more about human rights gradually. This is learning from practice. If we get more people involved in this process of learning, the culture of human rights would become better understood [in the society]. (Samsen/HM1/pp. 63 64)

PAGE 193

193 CHAPTER 9 DISCUSSION AND CONCL USION The preced ing chapters include interview data obtained from human rights professionals and the aggrieved that highlight their perceptions and experiences with legal practice and justice during the Thai war on drugs in 2003. The findings present how the respondents e ngaged in creating both domestic and human rights legalities within the specific context of the war on drugs but their responses can be extended to other context of state violence. To synthesize the findings, this chapter is organized in the following mann er. First, it identifies how the violence and abuses were rooted in the legal practices, justice system and society itself. The fit of violence with law and society through politicization of drug problems is reviewed. Second, it examines the legal and righ ts consciousness of the aggrieved and how they came to understand justice and law. The aggrieved survived outside law. They developed legal consciousness against law when taking the larger social condition into consideration. Next it discusses how the ide a of human rights was vernacularized and utilized strategically by the respondents, especially the human rights professionals. Then, the last section will introduce a few points suggested for future research. One of the overarching features of this chapter can be highlighted at the outset. It emerged from the presentation of the three schemas for how transnational human rights can be used in the struggle for justice. Each schema (the supplemental, the progressive, and the transformative) saw human rights la w as an instrument. The human rights professionals recognized that conflict was a necessary part of the process and accepted that law would be used as a weapon in conflict. They presented Turks (1976) argument that law, rather than being a means for dispu te resolution or conflict settlement, is often a weapon to advance social conflict Turks (1976)

PAGE 194

194 general propositions stand as a reminder to look for ways in which the Thai experience may reflect broader lessons about the inter relationships between law a nd society. Violence, S ociety and Law The Thai people have been familiar with methamphetamine for a long tim e; it was known first as the diligent drug because it was used by laborers to cope with long working hours. L ater it was labeled as crazy or mad t ablet s (ya ba). Since 1996, methamphetamine has been officially recognized as a dangerous narcotic like heroin for which the death penalty might be invoked It was no longer seen as an aid to diligent workers, but was presented as a threat to moral order o f the society, especially its children. This redefinition was driven by educated and professional members from the middle class (e.g., educated, professional etc.) after the Asian financial crisis ( in the second half of 1990s). The economic turmoil led som e Thais to trade drugs for a big profit as an alternative means of survival as the use of ya ba became recreational Methamphetamine has abruptly changed its role from being an instrumental stimulant for work to a social drug for which there is a large mar ket Recall Pongpaichit (2003) observes that A seller sells to a user, encourages that user to develop his own set of customers in order to generate the income for his own consumption. Strategically marketed, methamphetamine was no longer confined to on ly certain labor groups but transcended all segments of social classes, including school kids. In this time people of the middle class came to feel morally threatened by drug dealers. A relative social consensus emerged. A moral panic against methamphetami ne could be sustained because, according to Burns and Crawford (1999, 158) evil is ove rsimpli accounts of select horri of methamphetamine and the creation of a social threat, not unlike that which has been documented in other c ri minalization efforts (see Hagan 1980). Note that since the economic

PAGE 195

195 boom during 1980s and the first half of the 1990s, the political and social influence of Thai middle class increased and were spread through the developing mass media. Laothamathas (1996, 21011) observes that in that time the Thai middle class was a major sourceof media reports and opinion [T]he middle class, in alliance with mass media, became strategic politi cal actors, playing the role of public opinion formers. Although outnumbered by rural peop le who elect the government, it is the middle class in Bangkok that determines the political life of the government (Englehart 2003; Laothamatas 1996) The governments (before the Thaksin regime) responded to the moral concern of Thai m iddle class with a variety of campaigns to demonize drug users and dealers. Drug offenders have been publicly and officially portrayed, consistent with Cohens (1972) notion of moral panic as folk devils, craving to do violence against all walks of life, especially, the weak women, and children. The vilification of the dealers was used primarily to persuade people to refrain from using drugs. The governmen tal efforts addressed demand issues and included efforts to educate people or prevent use. Earlier governments did not seriously politicize the drug problems. It wa s the Thaksin regime that made drug problems as part of its populist policies to justify pre emptive violence against drug dealers. His struggle was to attack the suppliers. Attachak Satayanurak critically portrayed the strategies of Thaksins populist policies in Krungthep Thurakit (a Thai newspaper, December 20, 2002) The following quotation de scribes how engendering a moral panic politicized the attack so that the government was empowered and dissidents marginalized; violence could be morally justified in order to crush the enemy for the sake of safeguarding the nation. In the beginning, make people so thrilled by the policy that they believe that the party works for the impoverished or majority of the nation. From there, try to make the society

PAGE 196

196 feel that there are enemies trying to undermine the country and that they or their colleagues are t he only ones defending the country from those enemies. Eventually he (the prime minister) and his colleagues become the individuals who speak and act on the behalf of the people and the nation. The populist dictatorship will generate disputes and the other side of the disputes will be blamed as the enemy of the nation and society. This condition gives populist dictatorship the legitimacy to crush the enemy for the sake of safeguarding the nation, with the consent of people who believe they will ben efit from the state in future (cited in McCargo and Pathmanand 2005, 1878) Thaksins populist policies made NGO human rights professionals who were interviewed in this research decr y that they were socially marginalized dur ing the Thaksin regime. Recall that Thaksin also successfully manipulated Thai mass media for his political interests, justifying the populist policies and baffling his critics Like the U.S. war on terror, Thaksins war on drugs gained public support by o versimplifying the evil and making dissent suspect, something akin to Rothe and Muzzattis (2004, 336) reference to the simple dichotomy: Either you are with us or you are with the [ drug] terrorists H uman rights professionals in this research discerned the high political gains for the Thaksins government to wage the war and the high political loss for th ose who would resist his war on drugs. Even the Democrat Party, the leading oppo sition party in that time, chose to play a passive role because it feared to lose its political popularity. The extent of how successful the attempt was to create a moral panic came from the aggrieved people who were interviewed in this research. Surprisingly, many aggrieved people in this research also tolerated the war They did not reject the war itself but only objected that they were underserved victims T he war on drugs could be waged without threatening social solidarity. The social acceptance of the war led several human rights professionals to comment about the authori tarian ways of thinking that dominated Thai society. They thought the Thai people were too dependent on the leaders (including the bureaucrats) The people too readily deferred to

PAGE 197

197 the actions and deeds of the leaders (and the bureaucrats), which were presumed to be effective in resolving societal problems. One human rights professional also indicated how this deference meshed with the rule of Karma among lay Buddhists in that bad consequences would be visited on bad people. Bad things would not have happene d to people during the war on drugs (which was the authorities laudable effort to suppress evil) if the victims were not bad. The s uffering during the war could be dismissed as being just at some level The aggrieved recognized this attribution from their neighbors who would say things like, if they (the aggrieved) were not involved with drugs, no one would come to kill them. Th aksin made use of law enforcement as political instrument during the war on drugs ; his government exerted i ntensive political co ntrol over the bureaucracy (especially from February to April 2003) Some human rights professionals indicated they ha d never see n any government take such absolute control of the bureaucracy as did the Thaksin regime A clear timeline and numeric targets (quantifiable practical outcomes) were immediately and concretely applied so that compliant officials could be rewarded and noncompliant o nes punished L ike the witchcraft hunting in the Continental Europe (Currie 1973) the Thai legal system during the war on drugs was repressive. As experienced by human rights professionals and the aggrieved, legal actors were able to exploit various legal provisions to facilitate the false arrests and wrongful seizure of properties without any constraint by external (political, judiciary and social) institutions. Like witchcraft hunting in the Continental Europe, Thai law enforcement and the bureaucr acy had a high degree of structured interest (e.g., received from confiscating the properties of the accused ) to label and hunt down drug dealers and abusers (Currie 1973, 357). Although the law on the books authorized forfeiture, the law in action aggra vated its abuse.

PAGE 198

198 In some ways, the structured interest during the drug wars was grafted on pre existing practices regarding legal gratuities. There was folk knowledge about a subculture; some of the aggrieved in this research spoke freely about the rol e of money and connections to access justice. The corruption, especially within police organizations, has long been widely recognized: Low ranking policemen are alleged to collect money in various ways and pass it on to their seniors (Pongpaichit and Piriyarangsan 1994, 122) Pongpaichit and Piriyarangson (1994, 126) portray the police organization as a state within the state their professional subculture is independent from the control of the central government. The war on drugs politically succeeded by reinforcing this subculture ; it provided more opportunity for monetary rewards. Some of the ways seemed legally authorized (confiscation); others seemed normative (legal gratuities). Turk (1 976, 287) warns that the gap between black letter law (which does not countenance corruption) and the behavioral practices (where corruption is regularized) means that law itself promotes cynicism, evasion, and defiance even among its representatives and practitioners [including lawyers and police]. T he repressive law enforceme nt during the war on drugs benefited from the quasi -legal construction of kha -tad ton, a rhetoric invented by the government and used by the police to explain the mass killings as being the result of drug dealers killing each other. As identified by some human rights lawyers, these killings effectively prevented the intervention of the court ( for autopsy trial) because the kha tad ton rationale denied any involvement by state office rs precluding the legal need for court intervention. It enabled the legal actors to avoid any factual conflict in court and protected the police The law itself became a weapon to avoid a deeper conflict. According to Turk (1976, 284), [L ]egal power provi des both the opportunity and the means to accomplish the effective denial of the reality of conflicts by making it impossible or

PAGE 199

199 inordinately difficult for them to be articulated and managed. In this sense, law itself impeded justice by protecting those w ith more legal power (the police) and by denying a venue where conflicts could be aired for all to see. Kha tad ton helped hide larger conflicts in Thai society and institutionalized flaws in the Thai justice system Grave human rights abuses during the Th ai war on drugs did not disrupt the society because the violence and abuses fell in a nexus of government policy contrivances, unusual legal provisions, unassail able practices of legal actors, and societal features that encouraged or protected the violatio ns. This study clearly illustrates how law and society merge. Although what happened the Thai war on drugs is necessarily contextualized in Thailand at that time, the pattern of establishing the legitimacy for the modern government to use violence and stre tch its own law has parallels with other events elsewhere, including for example, the American war on drugs. In the beginning of the American war on drugs, public opinion was politically manipulated A moral panic was created about the threat of drugs (esp ecially crack), resulting in demonizing the illicit drug uses (Reinarman and Levine 1997a) The American society accepted pragmatic social values where the ends justify the means. Reinarman and Levine (1997b, 1) use the term drug scare to designate periods when anti -drug c rusades achieved great prominence and legitimacy. Drugs were portrayed not simply as folk demons but as national devils. As President Bush put it in 1989, among other things, drugs are sapping our strength as a nation: He also drew the problem of drugs as one of threat for general people in their daily lives : Drugs are a real and terribly dangerous threat to our neighborhoods, our friends, and our families (Elwood 1995, 103) The law was changed to address the threat. Prison terms were lengthened; conspiracy laws were broadened; forfeiture laws extended.

PAGE 200

200 In day -to -day practice law enforcement discriminately targeted blacks and Latino crack users and low -level dealers, and inner -city residents in general, during the course of the war (Glasser and Siegel 1997, 234) It was the war against the marginalized and it was politicized t o reinforce the structural inequalities (Steiner 2001) Illegal and unreasonable searches and se izures were evidently practiced, in a racial biased fashion to make a high number of arrests. L ike the pointing finger to make anyone a drug dealer, like using hearsay and uncorroborated evidence during the Thai war on drugs, some American detectives depen ded on single informants for [making] dozens of cases (Glasser and Siegel 1997, 236) The state and local police officials were also lured by monetary incentive through the Comp rehensive Crime Act of 1984, which provided that money and/or property confiscated with the federal drug enforcement authorities could be shared with state and local authorities The state and local police officers significantly increased their arrest s accordingly (Benson, Rasmussen and Sollars 1995) A bureaucratic interest competed with the public interest (the benefit for the good society) in waging the w ar. Dickson (1968) outlines how such bureaucratic interests came to dominate drug policies about marijuana in the United States. Those who study law and society should be mindful of such possibilities as they try to understand events. Even if the particulars differ from place to place and time to time, there is the general parallel that structured bureaucratic interests within government can play important roles in developing and enforcing drug policies. The Lack of Fit of Justice with Law S everal aggrieved felt want ed revenge against the state officers whom they blamed as the main source of their grievance. However, the constraints of the existing justice structu re cut off most avenues to hold those responsible accountable. S trategically they could only pursue a possible justice through declaratory claim s (as through the National Human Rights

PAGE 201

201 Commission). The resulting declarations would vindicate their innocenc e (or that of their loved ones); their only instrumental consequence may be in securing the return of confiscated property, winning insurance claims, or reclaiming some respectability in their communities. The declarations did little to hold their abusers accountable or prevent future abuses. One of the prominent themes emerging from those interviewed for this research was that authorities could act with impunity. The interviewees experiences with law during the course of the war on drugs led them to see p olice officers as being above the law The aggrieved, on the other hand, were relatively powerless and under the law. They had to operate very carefully; they feared (and had reason to fear) reprisals. Location under the law implies that they sensed tensio n with law. The aggrieved (and the human rights professionals) understood that law could be used as a weapon against the aggrieved if they dared to conflict with the authorities too much (see Turk 1976). Turk (1976) proposed that weak people could not read ily turn to law; those with more power can utilize law better. This may be one reason why the aggrieved settled for pursuing only a possible justice. Scholars have described similar binds for less powerful people in other contexts. Li ke the welfare poor dealing with the welfare bureaucracy, the aggrieved in this research also realized that to invoke their rights (e.g. victim rights) is to engage in an uphill struggle to make their voices heard because the ir claims were dependent on the same justice sy stem and the bureaucracy that were implicated in the violati on of their rights (Sarat 1990, 377) The experience of being under the law began when the aggrieved were criminalized by the state officers and stigmatiz ed by their neighbors as drug offenders. In other words, they became deserving of punishment because t hey were legally and socially classified as being involved with drugs and hence as be ing evil and a threat In this respect, t he means of suppressionthe

PAGE 202

202 violence and extralegal searches and seizures were not pro blems in themselves. The problem, as seen by many of the aggrieved, was that law enforce ment targeted the wrong people. The aggri eved (and human rights professionals) rejected the official label of being involved with drugs that triggered the wrongful arrests and seizures or kha tad -ton (the supposed drug related killings). Some of their experiences illustrate Turks (1976, 285) poi nt that using law to create social categories can sharpen old conflicts (some were named because of prior conflicts in the community) or produce new ones. M ost of the aggrieved realized the labeling power of the official blacklists they knew that their community and the society judged them as being involved with drugs. They felt that they were relocated from the center of the community (those who opposed drugs) to the margins (those who made a living from drugs). Although some neighbors felt sympathetic to the aggrieved, they were too powerless to publicly demonstrate such feelings The aggrieved decried that no one, except their close relatives, shared their feelings about the grievance. To feel compassion for the aggrieved (e.g. being a witness) might imply t aking sides with drug dealers. The fear of reprisal ran deep and extended beyond the aggrieved. The use (misuse) of law during the drug wars created more social divisions and conflicts much as Turk (1976) anticipated would happen when law is used a s a weapon. The importance of declaratory justice to the largely powerless vict ims should not be undervalued. Not only was it the most possible and immediate option available to them, it could also help them overcome the label so they could move back in to a more normal life in their communities. By being declar ed innocent they could begin to return to mainstream society. The aggrieved in this research made a declaratory claim to the bureaucracy and the National Human

PAGE 203

203 Rights Commission (NHRC) to counter the label to decriminalize and de -stigmatizing themselves. Note that for those who had already been extremely marginalized (e.g., those who used to be involved with drugs or those belo nging to ethnic minorities like hill tribe peoples linked to previous drug campaigns), the 2003 war on drugs furthered their marginality. Actually, the disadvantaged and the marginalized groups would rarely invoke their rights (Bumiller 1988; Engel and Munger 1996; Nielsen 2000) Therefore, it might b e possible that many other affected people did not attempt to lodge a complaint or advance a claim to bureaucratic agencies or to the NHRC for even declaratory relief. The comments of human rights professionals who worked with the ethnic groups (hill tribe people) raised the prospect that the true extent of the a buses has not been documented. Recall their observations that many of the ethnic killings occurred in small groups and that the victims and their families had to be educated about their rights first and even then were reluctant to lodge human rights claims. When they could overcome their reluctance, most of their claims came to the NHRC three years after the incident with undisclosed names. As the least powerful of all, these victims could use law the least (Turk 1976). Not even a declaratory claim with the NHRC seemed possible for most of them. Moreover, their plight holds a potential lesson. For powerless victims, treating human rights as individual choices might deter many people from pursuing reco urse through the idea of human rights. As individuals, victims are in poor positions to use law. Their claims may need to be aggregated and dealt with as a pattern of victimization across a group and pursued by a human rights organization that can generate enough power to use law when there is social conflict.

PAGE 204

204 In this research t he more the aggrieved struggle d for justice through bureaucracy, the more they felt powerless. The runaround process within the bureaucracy informed them of the largely futile natur e of their claim The decision of the bureaucratic agencies always affirmed the practices of the local police officers as consistent with the written rules and regulations. The aggrieved often denounced that the state officers were all on the same side. Al l of the aggrieved who lost their loved ones during the war were convinced that the cases would have been investigated more thoroughly if they were not linked to the war on drugs. Kha tad -ton provided an easy way for the authorities to dismiss the victims concerns. Routine investigations of other, ordinary murders would have precluded the need for the family members to seek help from the bureaucracy to declare their loved ones as the undeserved victims. Engel (20 05) also found the same theme of legal consciousness of Thai northern people interacting with the state authorities related to tort claim. Respondents in his study often complained that people with [official uniform] colors, referring to all state offic ers, always st u ck together E ven though they did not know each other personally, they helped each other. For example, in his study, Daaw, who was injured by an ambulance driver (who wore a uniform ), was investigated by the local police officer for the acci dent. She felt that the local police officer tried to make her accept the status of the wrongdoer rather than the victim of the accident Her following comment is similar to others recounted in this dissertation (Engel 2005, 507) People with colors [state officers] havemore of an advantage than we do. They think they work at the same place. They know each other. Something like t hat. We go to them, and we want them to help, but they dont help us. We dont get any thing from them. In stead, they turn around and ask us angry questions In Thailand, the implicit and sometimes very explicit assistance among the bureaucrats is not an unusual phenomenon. In addition, p eople often confuse the bureaucratic interest with the public interest and think the se interests are the same thing. A s mentioned previously in the discussions

PAGE 205

205 of witchcraft hunting in European Continental and the American war on drugs, governmental bureaucracies have their own interest s distinguishable from the public interest Again, Turk (1976, 285) anticipated such problems when he proposed that law can be used to exclude or distort information essential to an adequat e comprehension of [the problem] and thus can impede or prevent conflict resolution. The bureaucratic loop the aggrieved in this research experienced did not examine whether they or their loved ones were deserved or underserved victims Bureaucrats asked the local officers involved whether they followed the rules and regulations. The bureaucracy disdained what the aggrieved want most (the truth) but replaced it with the rigid rules and legal language to deny their legitimate claims Thus, the aggrieved in this research felt distrust for law (and the state authorities). They did not naively believe law w as a neutral and objective means to justice. Instead, to make the state officers do their work or to enforce law, non -legal factors, especially money and sen -sai (connections), we re indispensable. Without them, people reflected themselves as always powerless and invisible beings operating under t he law. As Turk (1976) noted, law can promote cynicism. Beyond declaratory claim s th ose interviewed all realized th at it would be impossible to pursue retributive justice against the specific police officers within the criminal justice system. It is impossible not simply because they discerned the ineffectiveness of the justice system but they really also feared repris al as the price of challenging the local police officers. Recall that the fee ling of fear penetrated all social sectors within the context of the war on drugs. The role of law, in fact, receded from their consciousness when they situated themselves in the larger social environment where might is still pervasively above law. Therefore, within the existing context,

PAGE 206

206 law itself did not resolve the conflict but it would bring them more and perpetual conflict with the local police officers Like the respondents i n Bumillers (1988) study of discrimination, in this research the aggrieved peoples attitude to their own survival also made them in ternalize pain and tolerate the impunity by avoiding invoking law against the abusers In addition to concerns about physic al survival (i.e. to avoid retaliation b y the officers), economic survival wa s another issu e raised. Economic concerns made it more likely for victims to lump it to internalize their grievances rather than to pursue them (see Kidd er 1983). The most stri king case in this regard was reported by Rattana who had to pay money for the police officer to bring back her mothers car after being stolen by the gunmen killing her parents She chose to give up her rights. She sacrificed legal justice to relieve herself from debts because she was the guarantor on her mothers car loan She had to settle because there was the possibility of pursuing the abusers was nil; she thought they were above law. Law, therefore, is not central to her and others survival; it was a n impediment to them rather than a tool for them. In this research, the ethic of survival is not an individual psychological choice of turning back to a normal life by neutralizing their defeat. S urvival becomes part of the social code embedded in the str ucture of the justice system it is a basic imperative. No matter how a victim may want to pursue law, he or she cannot lose sight of the risks As seen in this research, the social code of survival would be culturally reinforced by the professional (defen se) lawyers This emerged in several ways. Lawyers might discourag e their clients from press ing charge s against the police officers for their abuse of power, or lawyers may even reject a case entirely if a local police officer or authority is being named a s a party. The lawyers role in screening cases may not reflect judgments about the legal merit of the case as much as other considerations. A lawyer

PAGE 207

207 plays his role as double agent as a gate keeper to help people access the justice but at the same time to limit that access if a case challenges existing power arrangements (Blumberg 19661967) This has also been seen with American lawyers in divorce proceedings (Sarat and Felstiner 1986, 126) They exposed their clients (the aggrieved) to legal justice that is situational where the outcome is uncertainthings that were initially unexpected by the clients (the aggrieved). These lawyers gained power from the limitation of law to control their clients and to screen out the cases antagonistic to the status quo and the existing power relations T he screening role of lawyers benefited the whole justice system because it prevented the aggrieved from realizing that the whole justice system institutionally and systematically fail s to provide them the justice (Michelson 2006; O'Barr and Conley 1988, 159) The aggrieved in this study often individualized their problems by blaming the local police officers. Lawyers would discourage access to the legal system for the purpose of pursuing those officers. The victims were left to suffer and little was done t o alleviate that or to prevent future abuses because the l awyers would close off access. Perhaps that was for the best interest of the client (given the fear of reprisal), but it may have also been in the best interest of the lawyers who are invested in th e extant justice system and its institutions. This is not to say that lawyers might not also fear reprisal. A lack of institutional support to guarantee the safety of their clients and themselves, lawyers turn law as a weapon to deny the access of the just ice (Michelson 2006). According to Blumberg (19661967, 21) The court is a closed community. In larger theoretical framework, law for professional lawyers and the aggrieved, can generates more or less conflict and should not be thought of as suppressing it (Turk 1976, 284) Given pres sure to contend for control of legal resources, differential non -legal power can be expected to result at least initially in corresponding differences in legal power. The

PAGE 208

208 party with greater legal as well as non -legal power may then be able to increase its edge over weaker parties, even to the extreme of excluding the weaker altogether from access to the legal arena, cutting him off from even the opportunity to advance his claims and defend his interests legally. The aggrieved and defense law yers strategical ly chose to use or not use law to genera te less conflict with the local police officers Ideally, the black letter law aims to resolve conflict and restore victims. Although law in the ideal provides rights (i.e. victim rights under the criminal law and t he Constitution), the social experience and the cultural assumption (the larger social environment) will be what is important to inform peoples consciousness upon how to make sense of their social life when interacting with law (Bumiller 1988; Ewick and Silbey 1998; Nielsen 2000) Within the context of the Thai war on drugs, the struggle for retributive justice against the state officers through law d id not make sense at all. Because t here was no developed legal consciousness about rights, authorities could violate human rights violation during the war on drugs with impunity; the abuses of the war were sustainable. An other factor which made it difficult to challenge the authorities wa s the presence of the abusers (e.g. killers, torturers, and framers) in peoples daily li v e s In fact, the people in general we re not absolutely convinced by the theory of kha tad ton (the killings among drug dealers). Recall that the poll s (see Chapter 2) indicated that people felt ambivalent they supported the war, but they also feared to be killed or framed as drug offenders. All of the aggrieved in this research were also very confident that the killings and other abuses occurring to their loved ones or themselves related to state officers Knowing that the perpetrators were state officers (but not specific names ) helped preserve the environment of threat without triggering the concern from the justice system This situation is not unique to the Thai war on drugs. As Afflitto (2000, 91) argues in the context of Rwanda s eth n ic clean s ing that impu nity wa s structurally robust because there was

PAGE 209

209 no removal of the perpetrators from the victim pool. The aggrieved in this research also felt that the killers and abusers stayed among them Recall Chanas comment. His daughter and son -in law were shot dea d and criminalized as drug dealers during the war before all their properties were confiscated but later released because the local police officers made a false story about their drug related criminality. I do not fear the ordinary criminals as much as I f ear the police officers because they have gun s that can be used at anytime. The ordinary criminals, after the y commit crimes, just run away But the police officers are here with us everyday They have ability to fabricate a [convincing] story, which others can read, to make us [seem] guilty of crime. (Chana/AM6/pp. 162) By illuminating the fear of police in his daily life, Chana (and other s who were aggrieved) discerned that the police officers are not simply legal actors whom he could challenge through lega l means (by using available law within the existing justice system). Like other marginalized people who are daily vulnerable to police abuse of power, such as street women (Levine and Mellema 2001) the aggrieved in this study realized the real power of the police officers Their awareness grew from what was commonplace in their daily li v e s not from the black letter law or formal justice system The power of the police officers w as actually highest because they could operate under the guise of law but d id not need to use law at all (their violent force was above the law ). Therefore, the a ggrieved, who were under the law, developed a legal consciousness which Ewick and Silbey (1998) have termed against the law law wa s something to be avoided or rejected in their daily li v e s The ir reluctance to turn to law as a recourse does not imply that they have low legal consciousness (Nielsen 2000) In fact, their avoidance and reje ction of law is identified because they discerned how the power of law wa s implicated with other non -legal forms of force used by the local police officers

PAGE 210

210 Establishment of Human Rights Legality At the first glance, the idea of human rights seems to have had little impact on either the state or the perceptions of the aggrieved. Several aggrieved people recognized the unenforceability of the decision of the National Human Rights Commission (NHRC). They felt unsatisfied with the limited role of the NHRC. Th e law that was available to them could not provide an adequate remedy. People who have little direct experience with law can overestimate its potency. For example, American s often overestimat e the power and the role of the courts, for instance, in dispute resolution in small claims court (O'Barr and Conley 1988) T he aggrieved in this study had high expectation s for the NHRC. The N HRC often order ed the Royal Thai Police or the government t o pay compensation to the aggrieved within 60 days and voided property forfeiture s that occurred during the war. However, most of aggrieved people did not experience any change after receiving its judgment. There is concern that such a pattern of negative experience with the NHRC might suppress rather than sustain a rights consciousness (see Merry 2006a) Moreover, the process within NHRC tended to individualize human rights claims and depoliticize them. The individual declarations did not highlight the pattern of abuses or link it to government policies and systematic practices. The larger problem, that can be left unlearned in human rights cases, has been identified by Wilso n and Mitchell (2003, 6) : the criminal and political networks are intertwined and perpetrators are both criminal and political agents, and their violent acts are both criminal acts and human rights violation. The Thai war on drugs reflects well how deeper dimensions of the situation were left undeveloped To borrow the language of Hastrup (2003b, 312) the NHRC used the rigid language of law to translate thick moral (and political) problems into thin legal representations (see also Wilson 1997) The NHRC focused on the language of civil rights derived from the Constitution, the Criminal P rocedure Code and the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR) but did

PAGE 211

211 not d eal directly with the institutional responsibility and systematic nature of gross human rights violation s (e.g. shared intentionality of the violators that led to crimes against humanity) during the war on drugs. Nevertheless some aggrieved people strateg ically used the NHRC as the basis of their claim of rights against the state agencies but not for retributive justice. They used the NHRC ruling to try to get properties back from official forfeiture ( with mixed success ) and to declar e themselves as unders erved victims. The declaratory judgment from the NHRC help ed transform their injuries into human rights violations that provided some legitimacy to their claims It was their possible justice. The human rights law allowed them to articulate a social cat egory that could be used as a weapon in social conflict (Turk 1976) even if in only limited ways. Turk (1976, 285), however, also acknowledges that bringing things into the open frequently hardens existing boundaries, cleavages, and inequities [in a w ay that] makes genuine settlement more difficult. Recall that in Thailand victims were discouraged from pursuing their claims in other venues, perhaps because people understood Turks (1976) point. An NHRC declaration could not remove the risk of reprisal ; it could not pierce the impunity of the perpetrators; it could not completely remove the stigma of having been named in the war on drugs. Despite their relative legal impotence, the human rights claims did contribute to the construction of a human rights legality in Thailand in two ways. First, the claims from the aggrieved constitute conscious recogni tion that something out of the ordinary had taken place; their grievances were not ordinary fact s of life What happened to them was an injustice related to the abuse s of state power in their communities. T hey blame d individual officers at the local level. Polls showed that the general population recognized the potential for abuse; the aggrieved

PAGE 212

212 who prevailed brought its reality home Some consciousness was r aised, even if the continued presence of the abusers in the communities tinged it with distrust against law. Second, the human rights claims to the NHRC helped create a record of systematic and widespread human rights violation s The bare truths of the cas es were processed by the NHRC through both domestic law and the international human rights norms. T he NHRC could integrate all complaints and report them together as a form of collective memory In the larger picture, the cumulative contribution of the agg rieved would be merged with the effort of human rights professionals to place responsibility with the government in that time for violating international human rights law. Therefore, the participation of the aggrieved to engage (both consciously and uncons ciously) in creating the idea of human rights at the local level ideally help ed broaden awareness about official violence and state crimes, appealing to both domestic and international audien ces T he work of human rights professionals makes the idea of human rights meaningful enough for the aggrieved and the society to adopt human rights as a n alternative frame of justice when dealing with the state violence (Merry 2006b; Stammers 1999; Tuijl 1999) In this study, the idea of human rights was invoked by human rights professionals through three schemas supplemental, progressive and transformative. To borrow from Turk (1976), each of them provided a different strategy for using human rights law as a weapon in social conflict. The supplemental schema explains the idea of human rights as a principl e invoked together with the domestic law. Human rights is another tool to add to the domestic laws tool kit. This schema involves providing legal arguments against the practice s of the state authorities on a case by case basis. The idea of human rights is a threatening (symbolic) weapon (Turk 1976). If the individual officers do not pursue the rule of law ascribed by Criminal Procedure Code and the

PAGE 213

213 Constitution, the ir individual actions can be challenged and human rights principles can be part of that chal lenge In this sense, the universal principle of human rights supplies human rights professionals (especially human rights lawyers) with more ideological power to play the legal game with the state officers in the domestic legal arena Human rights argumen ts can be used both to humanize the legal practice and to lessen the gap between law in the book s and law in action. Legal rights formulations are supplements to various legal techniques and strategies that are employed in the respective cases As suppleme ntal, they will dominate the legal exchanges. Moreover the realities of the litigants (the fear of reprisal and the need fo r survival in the communities) constrain human rights professionals from advanc ing claims t hat surpass their client s actual need to return to normal li v e s with no more problems. Recall that the domestic justice occurs in close communities. Therefore, ordinary lawyers who are part of those communities might not be useful to advance the cause of human rights legality. In addition, s ome human rights professionals at the local/regional level recognized that the ir work for the issues related to the war on drugs was rather defensive. They could use human rights in an individual case to help a client who had been caught up in the war on drugs The progressive schema pits the idea of international human rights against state action s and its domestic legal practice s In this approach, law is clearly used as a weapon in social conflict (Turk 1976). The progressive schema moves the analysis to the structural problem of political oppression by the central government. To invoke this schema, human rights professionals at the national level invoke the idea of international human rights through legal language against the government. To the extent that d o mestic law itself was corruptly used by the government, the idea of human rights can be utilized as an external force, a form of power directly challenging the state practice s and rejecting the jurisdiction of the domestic law. By invoking this schema,

PAGE 214

214 Tha i human rights professionals at the national level wanted to place pressure upon the government through transnational human rights networks, along with their own (domestic) resistance to the government. Brysk (1993, 261) puts it in the context of Argentina under the last military dictatorship (1976 1983). The state can be transformed from above and below because it may control territory, force, and resources, but it cannot monopolize information and legitimacy. Social movements that lack conventional power can turn their weakness into strength by projecting cognitive and affective information to form internatio nal alliances. The Thai war on drugs received some response from the transnational human rights networks. Human Rights Watch and Amnesty International, for example, reported on the gross human rights violation s during the war on drugs. In this way, any cha llenge from human rights professionals from below (from Thailand) would be informed, sustained, and amplified by international pressure from above (Brysk 1993, 262). However, the challenge from Thai human rights professionals was difficult to sustain. U nlike the Argentine human rights movements, the Thai human rights efforts could not effectively mobilize the grieving families of victims in collective ways In Argentin a, human rights could be organized around famil y -based groups ; the Argentine human rights activists were politically but not socially marginal. In the war on drugs, Thai human rights professionals (including NGOs) were not socially supported. In addition, the human rights movement during the Thai war on drugs could not establish itself colle ctively because human rights professionals lacked funding. So me human rights professionals in this research decried that their activities against the war on drugs seemed to be odd job s; the organizations had been instituted for purposes other than to resis t the war on drugs The foreign sources of funding also reduced a great deal of financial support for various Thai NGOs. The international funding conditions human rights professionals to select the issues and to pattern their social movement (Merry

PAGE 215

215 2006b, 42). The NGOs in Thailand were politically and socially marginalized; they lacked adequate funding and little of that which they had was dedicated to issues arising from the war o n drugs. They had little power. According to Turk (1976), they were in a wea k position to use law as a weapon in social conflict. Although the progressive schema could not yield much change the pressure from transnational human rights regime still helped Thai human rights professionals to del egitimize the Thaksin government for c ommitting gross human rights violation s T he government recognized some threat of being blamed for human rights violations and responded to it by three forms of denial literal, interpretive, and implicatory (Cohen 1996a) The government denied that the legal elements of crimes against humanity or other gross human rights violation were not present within the context of the war on drugs. The government engaged in literal denial by bluntly claiming that nothing happened ; the charges levied by human rights professionals (and international organization agencies) were groundle ss. The government often argued that no verbal and written orders mandated the state officers to kill drug dealers and innocent people. The government literally denied responsibility. The government invented the rhetoric of kha tad ton and used it as inter pretive denial The rhetoric blam ed the drug dealers for the mass killings. Given the history of re labeling methamphetamines from an instrumental diligence drug to a threatening mad pill, the citizenry was tolerant of the extreme measures given the la udatory goals of the war on drugs. The war was broadly supported. The culture could accept the kha -dat ton interpretation of the mass killings. The role of the government could also be denied because the victims could be implicated as being involved with drugs. The implications could be made at both the aggregate level and in

PAGE 216

216 individual cases. In individual cases, t he investigating police officers often reported finding tablets of methamphetamine (ya ba) or other illegal items ; evidence that they planted at the scene. In the very small number of cases where the state admitted that officers were involved in a death, the victim was implicated for resisting with force. In these cases the officers action was dismissed as legitimate self defense. By implicating the victims, the government could deny its involvement in gross human rights abuses. Part of the value of the kha tad ton rhetoric used across cases was the implication of the victims h aving been evil drug dealers. The government also raised implicatory de nial by justifying the killings as un avoidable casualties of waging the war for a better society. It tried to convince the society that those labeled as drug dealers in the officers blacklists deserved the violence. The Thaksin administration also used i m plication to silence dissent. It oftentimes condemned its condemners as those who took side s with the drug dealers. This message also influenced the perception of the general people and other social institutions tolerating the daily killings and other viol ence during the war on drugs (especially the first three months from February to April 2003). F rom the experiences of the aggrieved and human rights professionals, the effort for the justice was blunted because of the cultural acceptance by society general ly of the state s denial. This kind of c ultural denial can be a potent defense mechanism against acknowledging human rights abuses (Welch 2003, 14) The cultural denial, in fact, is not a matter of secrecy, in the lack of access to information, but an unwillingness to confront anomalous or disturbing information (Cohen 1996b, 494) Recall that the Thai people did not naively bind completely into the theory of kha tad ton. They were sus pect of the po tential of the abuse of power. Nevertheless, there was cultur al denial about what happened. Such a cultural denial can loom

PAGE 217

217 large; the challenge of human rights professionals is how to vernacularize the global idea of human rights in the face of such widespread denial This may be one of the reasons some of the human rights professionals presented a transformative schema. Those human rights professionals who operated at the national level, shifted their beyond the structural problem of the go vernment and focused on the larger Thai society. They discerned that the problem of human rights violation stemmed from peoples idea system and social values. Therefore, the se human rights professionals invoked a transformative schema to challenge the soc iety itself They backed away from legal language because the use of rights language to measure and represent harm cast the human rights violation s during the war on drugs as only a matter of the perpetrators and the victims (Ross 2003) They did not want the idea of human rights to be limited by thinking that appropriate claims could come from only the victims who encountered only extreme sufferings (Woodiwiss 2006, 34) In this sense, general people can distance themselves from human rights violation s because the extra legal methods used during the war were not employed against them or their own families Recall that for many of the aggrieved, the problem was not the systematic practices used during the war on drugs, but the fact that they didnt deserve to be a victim. To some human rights professionals, the struggle needed to m ove to another plane if change was to occur. There remains considerable ignorance in Thai society (and elsewhere) about the gross human rights violation s during the war on drugs Perhaps t he locus of human rights ethics needs to change. A ccording to Cosana nund (2003, 81) a Thai law professor, People believe that the ownership of human rights belongs to the self, not humanity in general. The transformative schema tried to bring the issue of sufferings and justice at the marginality to the center of Thai people s lives. It wanted to use the ethic of human rights as belonging to all humans to th e center

PAGE 218

218 of a social debate. The argument is that the human rights idea will genera te social conflict and change. Although the language used in such a transformative debate may eschew legalese, its principles are rooted in human rights consciousness. In so me ways, this schema addresses Turks (1976) concern that using law as a weapon may harden boundaries and cleavages that makes change and resolution less likely. It emphasizes consciousness raising about human rights but does not use typical legal strategi es to pursue the change. The challenge facing Thailand is not unique. Like the mobilization of rights consciousness for civil rights, for example, in the workplace (see e.g., Munkres 2008, 470) human rights professionals in Thailand had both to convince people about their own vulnerability (that their rights could be violated during the war ) and g et them to accept the rights of others as legitimate and to honor mandated resp onsibilities to promote them. As Merry (2006a; 2006b) would put it, they had to vernacularize human rights. In this sense, the transformative schema might try to convince ge neral people to see themselves as surviv or s rather than bystanders who distanced themselves through the dichotomized legal language of victims and perpetrators Being survivors, they need to recognize they had the good luck not be victimized during the war Inasmuch as the general people feared abuses of power even as they supported the war, there was an opening to develop this kind of consciousness In the transformative schema, the human rights ideal was a weapon t o challenge the common sense of people about their irrelevance to the violence during the war T he goal was and is to mobilize the expressive dimension of human rights discourse to challenge the way in which relations and structures of power are embedded in everyday life by providing alternati ve values and norms as well as morally validating the identities and perspectives of those oppressed by the existing relations and structures of power (Stammers 1999, 10067; see also Merry 2006a; Engel and Munger 1996). In the process,

PAGE 219

219 observers warn tha t almost by default, human rights activists who represent the marginalized will themselves also marginalized (see Clarke 2003) That certainly occurred in Thailand during the war on drugs where the Thaksin government took great pains to paint any dissenters to its policies and practices as outsiders taking side s with the drug dealers. To prevent a backlash from the society, which supported the violent suppression of drugs, human rights professionals often concealed what they really wanted to challenge (the violence per se as always an unacceptable means to even laudable ends) In some ways, they too had to pursue the possible justice, so they settled for trying to establish the truth about what happened to entirely innocent victims. Thai society was less antagonistic to this emphasis than it would have been to naming and blaming the state and its agents for crimes against humanity. The entirely innocent victims were those whose killings did not make sense at all, those who had little to g ain from involvement with drugs and w ho had no history of drug use. Human rights professionals often presented the striking false stories made up by local police officers who tried to label every killing as kha -tad ton (killings among drug dealers). After the war on drugs, a few human rights professionals at the national level began bringing a few entirely innocent victims families to talk with the public, for example, through TV programs. But their activities were often blocked and controlled in a variety of ways by the Thaksin administration. While the focus on entirely innocent victims (or the underserved victims in the language of the aggrieved) might appeal to the larger society, it simultaneously excluded the sufferings of other so -called gray victims those who had some link to drugs in some ways at some part of their lives, directly or through their relatives (i.e., guilt by association). Merry (2006b, 41) suggests that If they [human rights professionals] present human rights as compatible with existing ways of thinking [only the entirely innocent victims did not deserve violence], these

PAGE 220

220 ideas will not induce ch ange. It is only their capacity to challenge existing power relations [violence would be deserved for no one] that offer possibilities. Applying Merrys (2006b) argument to the Thai war on drugs suggests that the exclusive focus on entirely innocent victi ms was incomplete. It would be less likely to challenge the social arrangements that facilitated the violence and abuse and, therefore, less likely to bring about change. Therefore, to establish the idea of human rights into Thai society, human rights prof essionals need to transcend the peoples common sense (which rejects violence only when happening to the entirely innocent victims) to a good sense of rejecting all forms of extra legal or ultra vires violence as a means for social ends (Hunt 1990) The argument is that only when the violence is truly challenged as unacceptable means for human relations will a transformation in society occur. A transformative sch ema, therefore, is a model for basic societal change. Conclusion and Suggestion for Future Research The social support for the war on drugs was maintained to some large extent through fear not only of drug dealers but of the government as well. Because of the general support for the war on drugs, it is safe to say that the people did not fear the government more than drug dealers. The fear of drug offenders was politically manipulated as moral panic. The concept of moral panic refers to not only the problem of criminality between criminals and the victims, but it also draws concern to other people (i.e., members of the middle class as representative of moral order) who think that a threat of crime is not far from their daily lives. They tolerate the pre e mptive defense of the order, even if carried out in violent and undue ways. Societal tolerance, however, could only allow the abuses during the war on drugs; it did not cause the abu ses. And the abuses did not guara ntee future safety for anyone. At some le vel, the most important cause of the human rights violations was the politicization of the drug problems by the Thaksin government, as part of its populist policies

PAGE 221

221 that monopolized the imposition of violence against drug dealers and demonized not only drug dealers but also the dissidents. The politicization of drug problems justified not only the state violence (through legal and non legal practices), but it also invited the society to exert a violence of a different kind against the government labeled dru g dealers on the blacklists through something like ostracism. This is why the immediate and possible justice the aggrieved sought was to move themselves back to the center of the society, something that could be accomplished by presenting thems elves as undeserved victims. The violence, even if it was extra -legal, was not problematic in itself; the problem, rather, was constructed as dir ecting it at the wrong people. The rule of law was not important to how Thai people expe rienced social life or part of their legal consciousness. The importance of law recedes when the larger environment successfully sustains a culture of impunity for state agents who abuse human rights. The aggrieved in this research chose, for the most part, to survive outside of the la w. They feared reprisal if they chose a recourse to law to make retributive claims against the abusers. Ironical ly, by fearing to make claims, the culture of fear remained in tact and the justice system maintained status quo. For example, the courts could a ppear as just, neutral, and independent from extra legal influences because the conflicts never reached the c ourt given the culture of fear. According to the aggrieved in this resear ch, money and significant sen-sa i (connections) were more important than due process. The aggrieved developed a legal consciousness against domestic law. This reality made it more difficult for human rights professionals to vernacularize the idea of human rights law and to make it a part of the lives of the victims and others in Thai society.

PAGE 222

222 A consciousness against domestic law provided an opportunity for human rights professionals to bring change by introducing the human rights ideal as an alternative framework. The challe nge is how to accomplish that. A supplemental sche ma, wherein human rights notions would be grafted into domestic law functions, may be the easiest strategy to initi ate, but it may not work well. It faces a challenge in many cases because of the aggrieved peoples consciousness against law. It may be diff icult for lay people to draw distinctions between domestic law (which they rejected because it contributed to their suffering) and transnational human rights formulations (which after all were found to some extent in the Thai Constitution with out benefitin g the aggrieved). Therefore, a human rights supplemental schema might bring the least social change because domestic legality retains a dominant role. On the other hand, a human rights progressive schema seeks to replace domestic legality with a transna ti onal human rights framework. It ideally challenges the existing power arrangement (and as such may be difficult and impractical to accomplish). In other contexts (like Argentina), success depended on both top-down p ressure and bottom up support. Some inter national organizations were willing to exert top -down pressure from the outside about the Thai human right violations. Even from the outside, however, there were mixed messages as International Narcotics Control Board essentially whitewashed the Thaksin re gimes drug suppression efforts in the i mmediate wake of the killings. Moreover, no bottom up indigenous pressure could be mounted and sustained to challenge the governments policie s and practices. Efforts to do so were fraught with risk of reprisal. Such efforts were cast as aiding the drug dealers and they found little societal support. Some of the most astute human rights professionals recognized the conundrum. To be effective, supplemental and progressive schemas would depend in Thailand on some socie tal

PAGE 223

223 transformations. S eek ing punishment of perpetrators and securing just deserts for the aggrieved would not work well without invoking a transformative schema. O nly when constitutional civil liberties and the idea of human rights become part of the colle ctive conscience can we expect a justice where abusers are held accou ntable and victims made whole. That is unlikely to occur if the only interested parties are those unlucky enough to be aggrieved and the perpetrators (who enjoy protect ion by existing arr angements). Everyone must have a stake in human rights as at least potential victims; no one who would violate h uman rights can be protected. To bring change, the transformative schema must integrate human rights ideals into people s ways of thinking and a cting. The important application of the transformative schema is to understand that human rights legality is enforced and re -created not in the official institutions or in a legal fashion but in the daily lives and social practices of the people themselves F uture research should pr oceed in several directions. First, more research needs to be done in Thailand to understand the dimensions of what happened there in the war on drugs and what has happened since. T h at research should extend interview s to people who we re affected by the war on drugs but who did not file a complaint to the National Human Rights Commission (NHRC). Their experiences and legal consciousness may be similar or different from that of the aggrieved in this research More research should a lso be conducted among the hill tribe peoples; the extent of the suffering for the ethnic group s needs further documentation. One of the issues that should be explored is cultural denial What role did it play for those affected by the war who did not file a complaint? What role did it play among the ethnic groups? What role did it play in the general populace? Research should be conducted by interviewing the general p opulation, especially the middle class and educated people, about what they knew, the natu re of the threat they felt, what they denied, how they felt about the killings and abuses, and

PAGE 224

224 whe ther their views have changed. Because cultural denial is such an important obstacle for localizing the idea of human rights it needs to be a cen tral focus o f future research. To the extent that Thailand is currently experiencing an insurgency, similar issues could be posed about law and the suppression of this threat. Research should also be conducted outside of Thailand to see whether the patterns and expl anations developed here to understand the war on drugs provide insight into other instances of human rights violations or questionable legal practices, even those that may not rise to the level of gross human rights violations. For example, drug wars in ot her places at other times employed some of the techniques used in Thailand if in less extreme ways. Will the schema aid our understanding of what happened in these other contexts? Research could specifically explore how the three schemas identified in this research help understand successes and failures in dealing with other kinds of human rights violation s in other places and at other times. The schemas can be refined or replaced as more studies are conducted and evidence across human rights tragedies is collecte d and systematically compared. The provisional lesson to be taken to the field from this research in Thailand is that the human rights idea is not actualized just by the visible hands of the professionals (i.e., state officers, lawyers human right s professionals). To some extent, the fate of human rights lies in the hands of the many invisible people in society who can make more or less room for human rights ideas in their everyday lives.

PAGE 225

225 APPENDIX A MAP OF THAILAND Source: m/download/maps/Thailand -map.gif

PAGE 226


PAGE 227


PAGE 228


PAGE 229


PAGE 230


PAGE 231


PAGE 232


PAGE 233


PAGE 234


PAGE 235


PAGE 236


PAGE 237

237 LIST OF REFERENCES Abbott, Kenneth W., and Duncan Snidal. 2000. Hard and Soft Law in International Governance. International Organization 54 (3): 42156. Afflitto, Frank M. 2000. Victimization, Survival and the Impunity of Forced Exile: A Case Study from Rwandan Genocide. Crime, Law & Social Change 34: 77 97. Amnesty International. 2003. Thailand: Extrajudicial Killing Is Not the Way to Suppress Drug Trafficking. 390012003?open&of=ENG THA (accessed May 11 2008). Aphornsuvan, Thanet. 2001. The Search for Order: Constitutions and Human Rights in Thai Political History. Paper presented at the Constitutions and Human Rights in A Global Age: An Asia -Pacific Perspecti ve, The Research School of Pacific and Asian Studies, Australian National University, Canberra December 1 3. (accessed February 4, 2009). Baker, Chris, and Pasuk Pongpaichit. 2005. A History of Thailand. New York: Cambridge University Press. Bamrungsuk, Surachart. 1999. From Dominance to Power Sharing: The Military and Politics in Thailand, 19731992. PhD diss. De partment of Political Science, Columbia University, N ew Y ork Bangkok Post 2001. HearthShaped Speed Pills the Latest Dealer Gimmick, December 22. 2003. Tightening the Screws on Drug Traders, January 19. 2003. Dealers to Face Lethal Govt. Action, January 25 2003. Three Month Crusade Launched February 1. 2003. UN Rights Chief Seeks Inquiry, February 12. 2003. Evidence of Blacklist?, February 23. 2003. Pradit Accused of Protecting Dealers March 11. 2003. Prime Minister Rejects U.N. Call for Rights Investigation, February 27. 2003. Ruling Party Warns Pradit, March 6. 2003. Lift the Clouds of Darkness and Fear, March 16. 2003. Campaign Hailed as a Huge Success, May 1.

PAGE 238

238 2003. PM Declares Nation Now out of Danger, December 2. 2003. Son s Death Shatters Family, December 11. Bantekas, Ilias, Mark Mackarel, and Susan Nash. 2001. International Criminal Law. London: Cavendish Publishing Benson, Bruce L., David Rasmussen, W ., and David L. Sollars. 1995. Police Bureaucracies, Their Incentives, and the War on Drugs. Public Choice 83: 2145. Ben Yehuda, Nachem. 1986. The Sociology of Moral Panic: Toward a Synthesis. The Sociological Quarterly 27: 495513. Blumberg, Abraham S. 1 9661967. The Practice of Law as Confidence Game: Organization Cooperation of a Profession Law & Society Review 15: 1539. Brysk, Alison. 1993. From Above and Below: Social Movements, International System, Human Rights in Argentina. Comparative political Studies 26: 25985. Buergenthal, Thomas. 1997. The Normative and Institutional Evolution of International Human Rights. Human Rights Quarterly 19 (4): 70323. Bumiller, Kristin. 1988. The Civil Rights Society: The Social Construction of Victims. Maryland: The Johns Hopkins University Press. Bunbongkarn, Suchit. 1999. Thailand s Successful Reforms. Journal of Democracy 10 (4): 5468. Burns, Ronald, and Charles Crawford. 1999. School Shootings, the Media, and Public Fear: Ingredients for a Moral Panic. Crime, Law & Social Change 32: 147 68. Business in Thailand. 1989. Dealing with the Drug Trade. In Business in Thailand, 35-38. Available at the Thai Information Center, Chulalongkorn University, Thailand (Document No. 44726). Chamarik, Saneh. 2002. The Role of Na tional Human Rights Commission. Paper presented at the Conference on National and Regional Systems for the Promotion and Protection of Human Rights, The Friedrich Naumann Stiftung, Strasbourg, France, October 7 11. ssion.pdf (accessed January 19, 2009). Charoenloet, Voravidh. 1991. Thailand in the Process of Becoming a NIC: Myth or R eality? Journal of Contemporary Asia 21: 31 41. Cheurprakobkit, Sutham. 2000. The Drug Situation in Thailand: The Role of Government and the Police. Drug and Alcohol Review 19 (1): 1726.

PAGE 239

239 Chinkin, C. M. 1989. The Challenge of Soft Law: Development and Ch ange in International Law. International & Comparative Law Quarterly 38: 85066. Chongkittavorn, Kavi. 2003. Thai Media: From Watchdogs to Lapdogs. Thailand Human Rights Journal 1: 20514. Chouvy, Pierre -Arnaud, and Joel Meissonnier. 2004. Yaa Baa: Product ion, Traffic and Consumption of Methamphetamine in Mainland Southeast Asia. Singapore: Singapore University Press. Christensen, Scott. 1991. Thailand after the Coup. Journal of Democracy 2 (3): 94106. Clarke, Richard W.J. 2003. Voices from the Margins: Kn owledge and Interpellation in Israeli Human Rights Protests. In Human Rights in Global Perspective: Anthropological Studies of Rights, Claims and Entitlements eds. R.A. Wilson and Jon P. Mitchell, 11839, New York: Routledge. Cohen, Stanley. 1972. Folk De vils and Moral Panics: The Creation of the Mods and Rockers. Oxford: Basil. 1996a. Government Responses to Human Rights Reports: Claims, Denials, and Counterclaims. Human Rights Quarterly 18 (3): 51743. 1996b. Human Rights and Crimes of th e State: The Culture of Denial. In Criminological Perspectives: A Reader eds. John Muncie, Eugene McLauglin and Mary Langan, 489 507, Thousand Oaks: SAGE. Connors, M. K. 2005. Thailand: The Facts and Frictions of Ruling. Southeast Asian Affairs: 36584. Cosananund, Jarun. 2003. Human Rights and the War on Drugs: Problems of Conception, Consciousness and Social Responsibility. Thailand Human Rights Journal 1: 59 88. Currie, Elliott P. 1973. The Control of Witchcraft in Renaissance Europe. In The Social Orga nization of Law ed. Donald Black, 344 67, New York: Seminar Press. Dabhoiwala, Meryam. 2003. A Chronology of Thailands War on Drugs. Article 2 2 (3): 10 16. Dalpino, Catharin E. 1991. Political Corruption: Thailand's Search for Accountability. Journal of Democracy 2 (4): 6171. Darian Smith, Eve. 2004. Ethnographies of Law. In The Blackwell Companion to Law and Society ed. Austin Sarat, 545 68, Massachusetts: Blackwell Pub. Darling, Frank C. 1970. The Evolution of Law in Thailand. The Review of Politics 32 (2): 197218.

PAGE 240

240 Dickson, Donald T. 1968. Bureaucracy and Morality: An Organizational Perspective on a Moral Crusade. Social Problems 16: 143156. Donnelly, Jack. 2003. Universal Human Rights in Theory and Practice. Ithaca: Cornell University Press. 2006. The Virtues of Legalization. In The Legalization of Human Rights: Multidisciplinary Perspectives on Human Rights and Human Rights Law and Saladin Meckled Garca, 67 80, New York: Routledge. Dupont, Alan. 1999. Transnational Crime, Drugs, and Security in East Asia. Asian Survey 39 (3): 43355. Elwood, William N. 1995. Declaring War on the Home Front: Metaphor, Presidents, and the War on Drugs. Metaphor and Symbol 10 (2): 93114. Engel, David M. 1984. The Oven Birds Song: Insiders, Outsiders, and Personal Injuries in an American Community. Law and Society Review 18 (4): 55182. 1998. How Does Law Matter in the Constitution of Legal Consciousness? In How Does Law Matter? eds. Bryant G. Garth and Austin Sarat, 10944, Evanston Illinois : Northeastern University Press. 2005. Globalization and the Decline of Legal Consciousness: Torts, Ghosts, and Karma in Thailand. Law & Social Inquiry 30: 469514. Engel, David M., and Frank W. Munger. 1996. Rights, Remembrance, and the Reconciliation of Difference. Law & Society Review 30 (1): 7 53. Englehart, Neil A. 2003. Democracy and the Thai Middle Class: Globalization, Modernization, and Constitutional Change. Asian Survey 43 (2): 253 79. Ewick, Patricia, and Susan S. Silbey. 1998. The Common Place of Law: Stories from Everyday Li fe Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Fazey, Cindy S.J. 2003. The Commission on Narcotic Drugs and the United Nations International Drug Control Programme: Politics, Policies and Prospect for Change. In ternational Journal of Drug Policy 14: 15569. Felstiner, William L.F., Richard L. Abel, and Austin Sarat. 1981. The Emergence and Transformation of Disputes: Naming, Blaming, Claiming. Law & Society Review 15 (4): 63154. Fineman, Daniel Mark. 1993. The U nited States and Military Government in Thailand, 19471958. PhD diss. Department of Political Science, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut Flick, Uwe. 2002. An Introduction to Qualitative Research. London: SAGE.

PAGE 241

241 Galanter, Marc. 1974. Why the Haves Come out Ahead: Speculations on the Limits of Legal Change. Law & Society Review 9 (1): 95160. Glasser, Ira, and Loren Siegel. 1997. When Constitutional Rights Seem to Extravagant to Endure: The Crack Scares Impact on Civil Rights and Liberties. In Crack in America: Demon Drugs and Social Justice, eds. Craig Reinarman and Harry G. Levine, 229 48, California: University of California Press. Goodale, Mark. 2007. Introduction: Locating Rights, Envisioning Law between the Global and the Local. In The Practice of Human Rights: Tracking Law between the Global and the Local eds. Mark Goodale and Sally Engle Merry, 1 38, New York: Cambridge University Press. Grau, Lauren. 2007. Cutting off the Building Blocks to Methamphetamine Production: A Global Solution to Me thamphetamine Abuse. Houston Journal of International Law 30: 157201. Guest, Philip. 1996. Assessing the Consequences of Internal Migration: Methodological Issues and a Case Study on Thailand Based on Longitudinal Household Survey Data. In Migration, Urbanization, and Development: New Directions and Issues ed. Richard E. Bilsborrow, 275318, New York: United Nations Population Fund. Hagan, John. 1980. The Legislation of Crime and Delinquency: A Review of Theory, Method, and Research. Law & Society Review 14: 60328. Hajjar, Lisa. 2004. Human Rights. In The Blackwell Companion to Law and Society ed. Austin Sarat, 589 604, Massachusetts: Blackwell Pub. Halliday, Terence C., and Pavel Osinsky. 2006. Globalization of Law. Annual Review of Sociology 32: 44770. Harding, Rosie. 2006. Dogs Are Registered People Shouldnt Be: Legal Consciousness and Lesbian and Gay Rights. Social & Legal Studies 15 (4): 51133. Hart, H.L.A. 1957. Positivism and the Separation of Law and Morals. Harvard Law Review 71: 593629. H astrup, Kirsten. 2003a Representing the Common Good: The Limits of Legal Language. In Human Rights in Global Perspective: Anthropological Studies of Rights, Claims and Entitlements eds. R. A. Wilson and J. P. Mitchell, 16 32, New York: Routledge. 2003b. Violence, Suffering and Human Rights. Anthropological Theory 3 (3): 30923. Hathaway, Oona A. 2002. Do Human Rights Treaties Make a Difference? Yale Law Journal 111: 9422014. Hicken, Allen. 2006. Party Fabrication: Constitutional Reform and the Ri se of Thai Rak Thai. Journal of East Asian Studies 6 (3): 381407.

PAGE 242

242 Hindley, Donald. 1976. Thailand: The Politics of Passivity. In Modern Thai Politics from Village to Nation ed. Clark D. Neher, 17291, Massachusetts : Schenkman Books Hoffmann, Elizabeth A 2003. Legal Consciousness and Dispute Resolution: Different Disputing Behavior at Two Similar Taxicab Companies. Law & Social Inquiry 28 (3): 691716. Hollinger, Richard C., and Lonn Lanza -Kaduce. 1988. The Process of Criminalization: The Case of Compute r Crime Laws. Criminology 26 (1): 10126 Holstein, James A., and Jaber F. Gubrium. 1995. The Active Interview. California : Sage. Horowitz, Richard S. 2005. International Law and State Transformation in China, Siam, and the Ottoman Empire during the Ninetee nth Century. Journal of World History 15 (4): 44568. Hull, Kathleen E. 2003. The Cultural Power of Law and the Cultural Enactment of Legality: The Case of Same -Sex Marriage. Law & Social Inquiry 28 (3): 62957. Hunt, Alan. 1990. Rights and Social Movement s: Counter Hegemonic Strategies. Journal of Law and Society 17 (3): 30928. Independent Committee for the Investigation, Study and Analysis of the Formulation and Implementation of Narcotics Suppression Policy. 2008. Preliminary Report. (accessed June 23, 2009). International Narcotic s Control Board. 2002. Report of the International Narcotics Control for 2002. (accessed January 19, 2009). 2004. Report of the International Narcotics Control Board for 2004. (accessed July 17, 2009). Jansen, Karel. 1991. Thailand: The Next NICs? Journal of Contemporary Asia. 21: 1320. Jelsma, Martin. 2005. Burma in the Global Drug Market. In Trouble in the Triangle: Opium and Conflict in Burma eds. Martin Jelsma, Tom Kramer and Pietje Vervest, 147 75, Chiang Mai, Thailand: Silkworm Books. Jelsma, Martin, Tom Kram er and Pietje Vervest. 2005. Trouble in the Triangle: Opium and Conflict in Burma. Chia ng Mai, Thailand: Silkworm Books. Kearns Thomas R., and Austin Sarat. 1993. Law in Everyday Life. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press. Kidder, Robert L. 1983. Connecting Law and Society: An Introduction to Research and Theory. Englewood Cliffs, New J e rsey : Prentice Hall. Koh, Harold Hongju. 1996. Transnational Legal Process. Nebraska Law Review 75: 181207. 1999. How Is International Human Rights Law Enforced? Indiana Law Journal 74: 1397418.

PAGE 243

243 Korinek, Kim, Barbara Entwisle, and Aree Jampaklay. 2005. Through Thick and Thin: Layers of Social Ties and Urban Settlement among Thai Migrants. American Sociological Review 70 (5): 779800. Kostiner, Idit. 2003. Evaluating Legality: Toward a Cultural Approach to the Study of Law and Social Change. Law & Society Review 37 (2): 32368. Lanza -Kaduce, Lonn. 1982. Formality, Neutrality, and Rationality: The Legacy of Weber in Analyzing Legal Thought. The Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology 73: 53360. Laothamatas, Anek 1996. Tale of Two Democracies: Confli cting Perceptions of Elections and Democracy in Thailand. In The Politics of Elections in Southeast Asia ed. R. H. Taylor, 20123, Washington, D.C.: Woodrow Wilson Center Press. Lauren, Paul G. 2004. From Impunity to Accountability: Forces of Transformati on and the Changing International Human Rights Context. In From Sovereign Impunity to International Accountability: The Search for Justice in a World of States eds. Ramesh Thakur and Peter Malcontent, 15 41, New York: United Nations University Press. Laur idsen, Laurids S. 1998. The Financial Crisis in Thailand: Causes, Conduct and Consequences? World Development 26 (8): 157591. Levine, Kay, and Virginia Mellema. 2001. Review: Strategizing the Street: How Law Matters in the Lives of Women in the Street -Lev el Drug Economy. Law & Social Inquiry 26 (1): 169207. Lewis, Paul, and Elaine Lewis. 1984. Peoples of the Golden Triangle: Six Tribes in Thailand. New York: Thames and Hudson Inc. Marshall, Anna -Maria. 2003. Injustice Frames, Legality, and the Everyday Co nstruction of Sexual Harassment. Law & Social Inquiry 28 (3): 65989. Marshall, Anna -Maria, and Scott Barclay. 2003. In Their Own Words: How Ordinary People Construct the Legal World. Law & Social Inquiry 28 (3): 617 28. Matichon. 2003 (B.E. 2546). Shockin g Posters: Only Death for Drug Trading (in Thai), January 19. 2003 (B.E. 2546). Free Coffin for Drug Dealers (in Thai), February 1a 2003 (B.E. 2546). Thaksin Declares War on Drugs: D Day Today Wan N or Affirms No Drugs after 3 Months of t he Battle (in Thai), February 1 b McCann, Michael, and Tracey March. 1995. Law and Everyday Forms of Resistance: A Socio Political Assessment. Studies in Law, Politics, & Society 15: 20736. McCargo, Duncan, and Ukrist Pathmanand. 2005. The Thaksinization of Thailand. Denmark: Nordic Institute of Asian Studies.

PAGE 244

244 McCoy, Alfred W 1972. The Politics of Heroin in Southeast Asia. New York: Harper & Row 1999. Lord of Drug Lords: One Life as Lesson for Us Drug Policy. Crime, Law & Social Change 30: 30131. 2000. Coercion and Its Unintended Consequences: A Study of Heroin Trafficking in Southeast and South West Asia. Crime, Law & Social Change 33 (3): 191224. Merry, Sally Engle. 2004. Colonial and Postcolonial Law. In The Blackwell Companion to Law and Society ed. Austin Sarat, 569 88, Massachusetts: Blackwell Pub. 2006a Human Rights and Gender Violence: Translating International Law into Local Justice. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. 2006b. Transnational Human Rights and Loc al Activism: Mapping the Middle American anthropologist 108 (1): 3851. Michelson, Ethan. 2006. The Practice of Law as an Obstacle to Justice: Chinese Lawyers at Work. Law & Society Review 40 (1): 1 38. Montesano, Michael J. 2001. Thailand in 2001: Learning to Live with Thaksin? Asian Survey 42 (1): 90 99. Munkres, Susan A. 2008. Claiming Victim to Harassment Law: Legal Consciousness of the Privileged. Law & Social Inquiry 33 (2): 447 72. Muntarbhorn, Vitit. 2008. Deconstructing Thailand's (New) Eighteent h Constitution. Thailand Law Journal 11 (2): 15. Eighteeth Consititution.html (accessed January 23, 2009). Nabi, Ijaz and Jayasankar Shivakumar. 2001. Back from the Brink: Thailand's Response to the 1997 Economic Crisis. Washington, D.C.: World Bank. Nagengast, Carole, and Carlos G. VelezIbanez. 2004. Human Rights: The Scholar as Activist. Oklahoma: Society for Applied Anthropology. Nan akorn, Pinai. 2002. Re Making of the Constitution in Thailand. Singapore Journal of International & Comparative Law 6: 90115. National Command Centre for Combating Drugs. 2004. The Prime Ministers Policy and Guideline in Combating with Drugs: January -December 2003 (B.E. 2546 in Thai). Available at the library of the Office of the Narcotics Control Board of Thailand (Document No. 01169). National Human Rights Commission of Thailand. 2006a. Human Rights Examination Reports for 2002-2004 (B .E. 2545-2547 in Thai).

PAGE 245

245 2006b. Human Rights Examination Reports for 2005 (B.E. 2548 in Thai). 2008. Human Rights Examination Reports for 2006 (B.E. 2549 in Thai). Neher, Clark D. 1976. Constitutionalism and Elections in Thailand. In Modern Thai Politics from Village to Nation ed. Clark D. Neher, 36786, Massachusetts: Schenkman. Nielsen, Laura Beth. 2000. Situating Legal Consciousness: Experiences and Attitudes of Ordinary Citizens about Law and Street Harassment. Law & Social Inquiry 34 (4): 105590. O'Barr, William M., and John M. Conley. 1988. Lay Expectations of the Civil Justice System. Law & Society Review 22 (1): 13762. Office of the Narcotics Control Board. 1996. Thailand Narcotics Annual Report for 1996. 1997. Thailand Narc otics Annual Report for 1997. 1998. Thailand Narcotics Annual Report for 1998. 2001. Thailand Narcotics Annual Report for 2001. 2003a. Three Months and the Fights to Overcome Narcotics (in Thai). Available at Thailand Information Ce nter, Chulalongkorn University, Thailand (D ocument No. 66340). 2003b. Thailand Narcotics Annual Report for 2003. 2006. Annual Report of Narcotics Suppression for 2006. Pathmanand, Ukrist. 2008. A Different Coup d etat? Journal of Contempora ry Asia 38 (1): 12442. Perl, Raphael F. 2001. Issue Brief for Congress: Drug Control: International Policy and Options (Updated January 19, 2001). Foreign Affairs, Defense, and Trade Division. (accessed July 17, 2009). Phatharathananuth, Somchai. 2008. The Thai Rak Thai Party and Elections in North Eastern Thailand. Journal of Contemporary Asia 38 (1): 106 23. Phongpaichit, Pasuk. 1980. The Open Economy and Its Friends: The "Development" Of Thailand. Pacific Affairs 53 (3): 44060. 2003. Drug Polic y in Thailand. Paper presented at the Senlis Council International Symposium on Global Drug Policy, Lisbon, Portugal, October 23 25. (Accessed May 11, 2008).

PAGE 246

246 2004. A Country Is a Company. Paper presented at the Seminar on Statesman or Manager? Image and Reality of Leadership in Southeast Asia, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand, April 2. (accessed January 19, 2009). Phongpaichit, Pasuk, and Chris Baker. 1995. Thailand: Economy and Politics. New York: Oxford University Press. 2004. Thaksin: The Business of Politics in Thailand. Chiang Mai, Thailand: Silkworm Books. 2008. Thaksin's Populism. Journal of Contemporary Asia 38 (1): 6283. Pongpaichit, Pasuk, and Sungsidh Piriyarangsan. 1994. Corruption and Democracy in Thailand. Chiang Mai, Thailand: Silkworm Book. Pongpaichit, Pasuk, Sungsidh Phiriyarangsan, and Nualnoi Tre erat. 1998. Guns, Girls, Gambling, Ganja: Thailands Illegal Economy and Public Policy. Chiang Mai, Thailand: Silkworm Books. Pongsudhirak, Thitinan. 2008. Thailand since the Coup. Journal of Democracy 19 (4): 14053. Pureza, Jose Manuel. 2005. Defensive a nd Oppositional Counter Hegemonic Uses of International Law: From the International Criminal Court to the Common Heritage of Mankind. In Law and Globalization from Below: Towards a Cosmopolitan Legality eds. Boaventura de Sousa Santos and Cesar A. Rodrigu ezGaravito, 267 80, New York: Cambridge University Press. Pye, Oliver, and Wolfram Schaffar. 2008. The 2006 Anti Thaksin Movement in Thailand: An Analysis. Journal of Contemporary Asia 38 (1): 3861. Quinney, Richard. 1973. Critique of Legal Order; Crime Control in Capitalist Society. Boston: Little, Brown. Rananand, Pirongrong R. 2007. Freedom of Expression in Thailand during the Thaksin Administration. In Human Rights in Asia Series: Communication and Human Rights ed. Mike Hayes, 12861, Nakornpathom, T hailand: Office of Human Rights Studies and Social Development, Mahidol University. Reinarman, Craig, and Harry G. Levine. 1997a. The Crack Attack: Politics and Media in the Crack Scare. In Crack in America: Demon Drugs and Social Justice eds. Craig Reina rman and Harry G. Levine, 18 52, California: University of California Press. 1997b. Crack in Context: Americas Latest Demon Drug. In Crack in America: Demon Drugs and Social Justice eds. Craig Reinarman and Harry G. Levine, 1 17, California: Univ ersity of California Press.

PAGE 247

247 Ro binson, Darryl. 1999. Defining Crimes against Humanity At the Rome Conference. American Journal of International Law 93(1) (1): 43 57. Ross, Fiona C. 2003. Using Rights to Measure Wrongs: A Case Study of Method and Moral in the Work of the South African Truth and Reconciliation Commission. In Human Rights in Global Perspective: Anthropological Studies of Rights, Claims and Entitlements eds. R.A. Wilson and Jon P. Mitchell, 163 82, New York: Routledge. Rothe, Dawn, and Stephe n L. Muzzatti. 2004. Enemies Everywhere: Terrorism, Moral Panic, and U.S. Civil Society. Critical Criminology 12: 327 50. Rubin, Herbert J., and Irene Rubin. 1995. Qualitative Interviewing: The Art of Hearing Data. Thousand Oaks, California: Sage. Samudava nija, Chi -Anan. 1982. The Thai Young Turks. Singapore: Institute of Southeast Asian Studies. 1990. The Military and Modern Thai Political System. In Development, Modernization, and Tradition in Southeast Asia: Lessons from Thailand, ed. Pinit Ratan akul and U. Kyaw Thau, 18589, Bangkok, Thailand: Mahidol University Press. Sarat, Austin. 1990. ...The Law Is All Over: Power, Resistance, and the Legal Consciousness of the Welfare Poor. Yale Journal of Law & the Humanities 2: 34379. Sarat, Austin, an d William L. F. Felstiner. 1986. Law and Strategy in the Divorce Lawyer's Office. Law & Society Review 20 (1): 93134. Sattah, M S Supawitkul, T J. Dondero, P H. Kilmarx, N L. Young, T D. Mastro, S Chaikummao, C Manopaiboon, and F van Griensven. 2002. Prevalence of and Risk Factors for Methamphetamine Use in Northern Thai Youth: Results of an Audio Computer -Assisted Self -Interviewing Survey with Urine Testing. Addiction 97 (7): 80108. Sayre, Francis B. 1928. The Passing of Extraterritoriality of Siam. American Journal of International Law 22 (1): 70 88. Sherman, S., C. Sutcliffe, D. German, B. Sirirojn, A. Aramrattana, and D. Celentano. 2009. Patterns of Risky Behaviors Associated with Methamphetamine Use among Young Thai Adults: A Latent Class An alysis. Journal of Adolescent Health 44 (2): 16975. Siamwalla, Ammar. 2000. Anatomy of the Thai Economic Crisis (Thailand Development Research Institute). unpublished/anatomy.pdf (accessed July 17, 2009). Smith, Jonathan A. 1995. Semi Structured Interviewing and Qualitative Analysis. In Rethinking Methods in Psychology eds. Luk V an Langenhove Rom Harr and Jonathan A. Smith, 9 26, Thousand Oaks, C alifornia : Sage.

PAGE 248

248 Spradley, James P. 1979. The Ethnographic Interview. Belmont, C alifornia : Wadsworth/Thomson Learning. Sribanditmongkol, P., M. Chokjamsai, and S. Thampitak. 2000. Methamphetamine Overdose and Fatality: 2 Cases Report. Journal of t he Medical Associa tion of Thailand 83 (9): 11203. Stammers, Neil. 1999. Social Movements and the Social Construction of Human Rights. Human Rights Quarterly 21: 9801008. Stanton, M. Duncan. 1976. Drugs, Vietnam, and the Vietnam Veteran: An Overview. American Journal of Dr ug Alcohol Abuse 3 (4): 55770. Steiner, Benjamin D. 2001. The Consciousness of Crime and Punishment: Reflections on Identity Politics and Lawmaking in the War on Drugs. Studies in Law, politics, and Society 23: 187214. Steiner, Henry J., and Philip Alsto n. 2000. International Human Rights in Context: Law, Politics, Morals: Text and Materials. New York: Oxford University Press. Suvarnajata, Supa luck. 1994. Thai Military Coup d etat: Origins, Withdrawal/Civilian Control, and Perspectives. PhD diss. Departme nt of Political Science, Claremont Graduate School, Claremont, C alifornia Thailand Development Research Institute. 1995. Estimates of Numbers of Drug Traders in Thailand (in Thai). The Nation 1999. Narcotics Board Seeks Closure of More Checkpoints, August 6. 2000. Drug Raid Nets 1.8 Millions Amphetamines, October 3. 2001. Thirty Million Asians Are Addicted to 'Ya Ba', March 10a 2001. Three Major Gangs, 87 Production Plants, March 10b 2001. Intelligence Report: 30 Drug Fact ories Spotted, May 9. 2001. Judges in Own War against Drug Traffickers, July 27 2001. Smuggling Unabated, August 22. 2003. Feb 1 Is Drugs D Day, PM Says, January 17. 2003. Pm Launches War on Illegal Drugs, February 1. 2003. Drug War Starts, 2 Shot Dead, February 2. 2003. Monday 4 Suspects Shot Dead on Day 1 of Drug War, February 3.

PAGE 249

249 2003. Drug Crackdown: C ampaign Will Make a Difference : Sant, February 4. 2003. Nationwide Review of Drug War, February 9. 2003. Anti Drug Campaign: Thaksin Threatens Poor Performers, February 12. 2003. PM Orders Probe into Drug Killings, February 14. 2003. Narcotics Crackdown: Innocents on Blacklist, February 15. 2003. Cash for Kin of Dead Drug Suspects, February 17. 2003. War on Drugs: Respite for Governors, February 19. 2003. War on Drugs: Blacklisted Suspects Uncertain Future, February 23. 2003. War on Drugs: Strong Support for Crackdown, February 24. 2003. War on Drugs: Police Chief: Govt. Blacklist Flawed, February 26. 2003. War on Drugs: Blacklists under Review, February 27. 2003. Thaksin Sets Up 2 Panels to Monitor Drug War, March 1. 2003. Govt M ay Face Intl Court, Marc h 3. 2003. Drug Killings: Let UN Come and See, Says Thaksin, March 4 a 2003. Drug Related Killings: Verify the Toll, March 4 b 2003. In a State of Fear, March 5. 2003. I Was Just Doing My Job: NHRC s Pradit, March 7. 2003. War on Drugs: Scholars Plead for Restraint, March 10. 2003. Jail or Death for Dealers March 24. 2003. Drug Suppression: Police, Informants to Get Cash Rewards, April 9. 2003. Drug War Casualties: Couples Silencing Queried, May 22. 2003. War on Drugs the Victims Nation, December 13. T reerat, Nualnoi, Noppanun Wannathepsakul, and Daniel Ray Lewis. 2000. Global Study on Illegal Drugs: The Case of Bangkok, Thailand. The Research Project Supported by the United Nations D rug Control Programme. (accessed January 15, 2009).

PAGE 250

250 Tuijl, Peter van. 1999. NGOs and Human Rights: Sources of Justice and Dem ocracy. Journal of International Affairs 52 (2): 493512. Turk, Austin T. 1976. Law as a Weapon in Social Conflict. Social Problems 23 (3): 27691. Tyler, Tom R. 1990. Why People Obey the Law. New Haven: Yale University Press. U.S. Department of Justice, N ational Drug Intelligent Center. 2003. National Drug Threat Assessment for 2003. U.S. Department of State, Bureau of Democracy, Human Rights, and Labor. 2004. Thailand: Country Reports on Human Rights Practices for 2003. United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime. 2002. Global Illicit Drug Trends for 2002. and analysis/global_illicit_drug_drug_trends.html (accessed January 1 9, 2009). 2003. Global Illicit Drug Trends for 2003. and analysis/global_illicit_drug_drug_trends.html (accesse d January 19, 2008). Verachai, V., A. Patarakorn, S. Dechongkit, and L. Lukanapichonchut. 2001. Drug Addicts Treatment for Ten Years in Thanyarak Hospital (1989 1998). Journal of the Medical Association of Thailand 84 (1): 2429. Weber, Max. 1949. The Meth odology of the Social Sciences. Translated and edited by Edward A. Shils and Henry A. Finch, New York: Free Press Welch, Michael. 2003. Trampling Human Rights in the War on Terror: Implications to the Sociology of Denial. Critical Criminology 12: 1 20. Wi lson, Richard A. 1997. Representing Human Rights Violations: Social Contexts and Subjectivities. In Human Rights, Culture and Context: Anthropological Perspectives ed. Richard A. Wilson, 134 60, Illinois: Pluto Press. 2006. Is the Legalization of Human Rights Really the Problem? Genocide in the Guatemalan Historical Clarification Commission. In The Legalization of Human Rights: Multidisciplinary Perspectives on Human Rights and Human Rights Law Cali and Saladin Meckled Garca, 151 85, New York: Routledge. Wilson, R.A., and Jon P. Mitchell. 2003. Introduction: The Social Life of Rights. In Human Rights in Global Perspective: Anthropological Studies of Rights, Claims and Entitlements eds. R.A. Wilson and Jon P. Mitchell, 1 15, New York: Routledge. Winichakul, Thongchai. 2008. Toppling Democracy. Journal of Contemporary Asia 38 (1): 1137.

PAGE 251

251 Woodiwiss, Anthony. 2006. The Law Cannot Be Enough: Human Rights and the Limits of Legalism. In Th e Legalization of Human Rights: Multidisciplinary Perspectives on Human 49, New York: Routledge. Yawnghwe, Chao Tzang. 1993. The Political Economy of the Opium Trade: Implications for Shan State. Journal of Contemporary Asia 23 (3): 30626. Yoshifumi, Tamada. 2008. Myths and Realities: The Democratization of Thai Politics. Kyoto, Japan: Kyoto University Press THAI STATUTES CITED Act on Measures for the Suppression of Offenders in a n Offense Relating to Narcotics B.E. 2534 (1991) Anti -Money Laundering Act B.E. 2542 (1999) Constitution of t he Kingdom of Thailand B.E. 2540 (1997) Constitution of t he Kingdom of Thailand B.E. 2550 (2007) Criminal Procedure Code Narcotics Control Act B.E. 2519 (1976) Narcotics Act B.E. 2522 (1979) National Human Rights Commission Act B.E. 2542 (1999) Psychotropic Substances Act B.E. 2518 (1975) THAI OFFICIAL DOCUMENTS CITED Ministry of Interiors O rder No. Mor Tor 0211.1/Wor 343 dated 30 January 2003, c on cerning the implementation of the Prime Ministers instructions Ministry of Interior s Order No. Mor Tor 0211.1/Wor 378 dated 3 February 2003, c oncerning the identification of indicators for narcotic prevention and control. Mi nistry of Interiors Order ( m ost urgent ) No. Mor Tor 0211.1/Wor 436 dated 5 February 2003, c oncerning the change and renewal of indicators or targets of the implementation Ministry of Interior s Order ( most urgent ) N o. NCCB MOI/Wor 24 dated 15 February 2003, c oncerning clarification on the methods to combat drugs of NCCB Province/Provisional district.

PAGE 252

252 Ministry of Interiors Order ( most urgent ) N o. NCCB MOI/Wor 78 dated 21 February 2003, s pecifying that only three methods are allowed for reducing the numbers of drug dealers and producer s including arrest, extrajudicial execution or death Notification o f the Ministry of Public Health No. 135 B.E. 2539 (1996)

PAGE 253

253 BIOGRAPHICAL SKETCH Suchat Wongsinnak received his Bachelor of Arts (Public Administration) from Chiang Mai University and Bachelo r degree of L aw from Ramkhamhaeng University, Thailand. A fter graduation, he had worked as a lawyer at the Office of Administrative Courts, Bangkok, Thailand, for almost three years before reward ed the Royal Thai Government Scholarship to study Master and Ph.D. degrees in the United States. After completing the Master of Arts in political s cience from University of Florida, he enrolled in the d octoral program at the same university but in Department of Criminology, Law, and Society in 2005. His research interests include state crimes, critical criminology, law and society, human rights, and administrative justice.