Citation
Analysis of Spatial Information to Improve Retrieval of Cartographic Materials by Providing Geographic Coordinate Information

Material Information

Title:
Analysis of Spatial Information to Improve Retrieval of Cartographic Materials by Providing Geographic Coordinate Information
Creator:
Gonzalez, Jorge A
Place of Publication:
[Gainesville, Fla.]
Publisher:
University of Florida
Publication Date:
Language:
english
Physical Description:
1 online resource (81 p.)

Thesis/Dissertation Information

Degree:
Master's ( M.A.)
Degree Grantor:
University of Florida
Degree Disciplines:
Geography
Committee Chair:
McDade, Barbara E.
Committee Members:
Armstrong, Helenjane
Hurt, Jeff A.
Graduation Date:
12/14/2007

Subjects

Subjects / Keywords:
Cartography ( jstor )
Cataloging ( jstor )
Coordinate systems ( jstor )
Digital libraries ( jstor )
Genetic mapping ( jstor )
Geographic information systems ( jstor )
Information retrieval ( jstor )
Libraries ( jstor )
Maps ( jstor )
Spatial data ( jstor )
Geography -- Dissertations, Academic -- UF
bounding, box, cartographic, cataloging, coordinates, library, map, metadata
Genre:
Electronic Thesis or Dissertation
born-digital ( sobekcm )
Geography thesis, M.A.

Notes

Abstract:
This work presents research findings on how geographic coordinates can improve the retrieval of library materials at the University of Florida Libraries while attempting to provide spatial information to library bibliographic records for more efficient access of cartographic materials. Retrieval and accuracy problems arise because maps are not always published with coordinates. The researcher can follow library cataloging rules in order to provide coordinates on bibliographic records, and interpolate numbers by following strict guideline standards. Bounding boxes and center point coordinates are key components in the library catalog record. Additionally, GIS has universal applications that apply to interdisciplinary studies and international cooperation in regard to establishing standards. The objective proposed in this work is to see how spatial information through the use of geographic coordinates can help not only to read and manipulate cartographic data but also to help organize other library materials. By improving library classification schemes of electronic and digitized materials and also enhancing traditional classification and retrieval mechanisms and standards, University of Florida Libraries' catalogers can keep up with the researchers' demands for better access to materials. The UF Libraries can then attempt to shift to newly created and shared geographic information systems and use spatial data that allow for the retrieval processes to increase usage, access, and metadata integration. This work explores the importance of understanding and applying map cataloging rules to provide the most accurate information possible in the local database. It offers additional methods to help find maps and other cartographic information quickly and accurately from an online retrieval database. A strong need has occurred to standardize spatial data to improve search query responses by providing uniform information and by addressing thematic errors. The work will present the idea of using the digital library to help introduce the concept of spatial reference to enhance retrieval capabilities, teaching, and learning. ( en )
General Note:
In the series University of Florida Digital Collections.
General Note:
Includes vita.
Bibliography:
Includes bibliographical references.
Source of Description:
Description based on online resource; title from PDF title page.
Source of Description:
This bibliographic record is available under the Creative Commons CC0 public domain dedication. The University of Florida Libraries, as creator of this bibliographic record, has waived all rights to it worldwide under copyright law, including all related and neighboring rights, to the extent allowed by law.
Thesis:
Thesis (M.A.)--University of Florida, 2007.
Local:
Adviser: McDade, Barbara E.
Statement of Responsibility:
by Jorge A Gonzalez.

Record Information

Source Institution:
University of Florida
Holding Location:
University of Florida
Rights Management:
Copyright Gonzalez, Jorge A. Permission granted to the University of Florida to digitize, archive and distribute this item for non-profit research and educational purposes. Any reuse of this item in excess of fair use or other copyright exemptions requires permission of the copyright holder.
Classification:
LD1780 2007 ( lcc )

Downloads

This item has the following downloads:


Full Text





land areas. Map librarians must play a bigger interactive role with the users of their map

collections. The advancement of digital mapping into the traditional structure of the paper map

library gives librarians and users the opportunity to discover and learn the functionality of digital

maps. Map librarians will continue the dual role of guides, helping people understand and make

sense of graphic images whether digitized or on paper (Parry, 1995).

A shifting of educational requirements must occur for the professional librarians if there

is any hope to keep up with the technology needed for them to promote library use. Librarians

need to incorporate geographic coordinate representation into metadata for all types of

information obj ects. They need to develop gazetteer services to translate place names in subj ect

headings and coordinates to aid library cataloging to facilitate information retrieval services.

Librarians' involvement and active engagement of researchers can help find the balance needed

to improve organization of materials.

Exigency in Information Science

This work is an opportunity to point out the problems that libraries face with keeping up

with the changes occurring in information science and technology. This opportunity presents a

chance to look at the change that may be identified as the crisis part of an incoming paradigm

shift. Kuhn (cited in Smits, 2002) used the term paradigm to denote a generally accepted set of

assumptions and procedures that serve to define both subj ects and methods of scientific inquiry:

When the assumptions and the procedures which serve them cannot answer
anymore the aim for which they have been formulated or when the aim seems in
need of reformulation as the answers are not adequate anymore, new assumptions
and procedures have to be formulated which might answer the questions posed.

Researchers need to be provided access to library resources in a timely and orderly fashion

Library collections and library cataloging system must be organized using national bibliographic

standards. The catalog or library database provides access for multiple concurrent users and









LIST OF ACRONYMS

Anglo-American Cataloguing Rules (2nd Revision)

Alexandria Digital Earth Prototype proj ect

Alexandria Digital Library

American Library Association

Association for Library Collections and Technical Services

Associations of College and Research Libraries (division of ALA)

U.S. Board of Geographic Names

Environmental Systems Research Institute

United States Federal Geographic Data Committee

Florida Geographic Data Library

Geographic Information Systems

GEOnet Names Server

Geographic Names Information System

Harvard University Library

Joint Steering Committee for revision of AACR

International Conference on the Principles and Future Development of
AACR

Map & Geography Round Table (ALA)

Machine Readable Cataloging

National Research Council

Online Computer Library Center

Resource Description and Access

United States Geological Survey

United States Postal Service


AACR2

ADEPT

ADL

ALA

ACLTS

ACRL

BGN

ESRI

FGDC

FGDL

GIS

GNS

GNIS

HUL

JSC -

ICPFDA


MAGERT

MARC

NRC

OCLC

RDA

USGS

USPS









remote sensing images. To further emphasize the complexity of agreeing to standards, it is

important to point out that they come by way of international cooperative efforts. Such AACR

practices come with input from the United Kingdom, Canada, and Australia.

Prior to 1950 the tradition was to consider the geographic place and date of maps as

important and relevant information for indexing, but soon afterwards more maps began to appear

in catalogs (Lubas, 2003). Furthermore to provide peer group help and exchange ideas, the Map

and Geography Round Table (MAGERT, 2007) is in the American Library Association. It has

been around since 1980, and today is the world's largest map library organization. This group

provides a forum for people interested or involved in any aspect of map or geography

librarianship. Map catalogers can use MAGERT to exchange ideas regarding map collections,

and they can work as an advocate group for the use and control of map collections, can include

regular meetings to discuss informative programs, and can meet other map professionals.

MAGERT publishes is own newsletter, journal, books, and occasional papers. The cooperative

work among geographic librarians is complemented in part by the use of list-serys, such as

Maps-L.

In addition to agreed-upon rules, an important supplement for professionals dealing with

maps is the book World2apping Todaly (Parry & Perkins, 2002). This book provides

information on the production, acquisitions, and distribution of maps and other forms of spatial

data. This publication is one of the primary reference sources and research tools for anyone

involved in maps and spatial data. The book provides access to information about policies and

programs of the mapping industry within each country. Due to the fact that most maps are not yet

digitally available or cataloged, they are difficult to find, which adds to the argument for

providing geographic coordinates to library records of cartographic materials.










pp.363-364). The double-edged sword to all of geography's ails is that overnight GIS created a

huge demand for technical skills from faculty and staff creating a small hiring pool.

Furthermore, the diffusion and advances of information technology have contributed to a

crisis which Pickles identified,

"The crisis of technological science is also a crisis of liberal legal and political
theory. What constitutes appropriate methodology in the social sciences is
thoroughly conditioned by the broader representational systems of political belief
on which liberalism is founded. This is the Pandora' s Box that critical human
geographers opened from the 1970s onwards. ... [The book] Demystify/ing... calls
for the hard work of theory to begin ...the necessity of carrying out this hard work
through the traditions of thought...and ... calls for a theoretical turn in geography
that began in the 1970s." (Pickles, 1997, p. 370)

Jan Smits, noted Dutch cartographer and librarian, and great contributor to the filed

of map and geography librarianship,

The most relevant source of information for researchers in this book is a piece of
software called 'Earth', which "keeps track of every bit of spatial information that
it owns all the maps, weather data, architectural plans, and satellite surveillance
stuff". When this step is taken further, one may also add to these geospatial data
all locational data, which is part of analogue and digital alphanumerical obj ects
and databases, keeping in mind that a lot of spatial phenomena, including human
activity, are constantly monitored (2002, p. 22).

Michael F. Goodchild (2004, p. 10), professor of geography at the University of

California, Santa Barbara; conducted research related to geographic information science, spatial

analysis, the future of the library, and uncertainty in geographic data. Goodchild stated:

The traditional library has relied on author, title, and subj ect as the keys to its
catalog. Although one might imagine using geographic location as a key, the
technical difficulties associated with doing so in a traditional library are profound.
But they are comparatively trivial in a digital library, and several WWW sites
now support search of their information archives using geographic location as a
primary key. One can ... search the site of the Environmental Protection Agency
.. for all information related to a particular area, such as a ZIP code. A geolibrary
is defined as a digital library that is searchable by geographic location, returning
maps, images, reports, photographs, and even pieces of music identified with a
particular location.











Wiegand, Patrick.. 2006. Learning and rleachIinlg nI ith maps. New York: Routledge.

Wood, William B. 2000. "GIS as a tool for territorial negotiations," in IBRUBound aryddd~~~~~~ddddd
and Security Bulletin. (Autumn issue):72-78

Woodruff, Allison Gyle & Plaunt, Christian. 1999. "GIPSY: Automated geographic
indexing of text documents," in Journal of the American Society for Information
Science. 45, no. 9.

Wright, Bruce and Urban-Mathieux, Brigitta. (1996?). Development ofan Electronic
National Atlas Prototyipe, (USGS publication) retrieved Summer 2007 from
http ://www.gis.usu.edu/docs/protected/procs/esi/997/PROC97/TO600/PAP576/
P576.HTM .

University of Florida Libraries Catalog, "Advanced Search,"
http://uf catalog.fcla. edu/uf~jsp

Youngblood, Dawn. 2006. "Map use across the disciplines," in Journal of2ap &
Geography Libraries. 2, no. 2:33-66

Yu, Lixin 1999. "Knowledge discovery in spatial cartographic information retrieval," in
Library Trends. 48, no. 1.









ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

I would like to thank my committee members Dr. Barbara McDade, Dr. HelenJane

Armstrong and Dr. Jeff Hurt for all their support and guidance. Also, would like to thank Joshua

Comenetz, who has been an invaluable source of inspiration, guidance and encouragement.

I would also like to thank everyone who had anything to do with putting up with me while

I took on this wonderful proj ect.

Finally, I thank Sally Dickinson for her encouragement and moral support; Paige Andrew

for his expertise and guidance, and Jimmie Lundgren, for her support and understanding my

school needs and scheduling.









how librarians can assist. One approach that must be taken is the challenge of making use of map

retrieval efficient for the end-user, how education can help this and how library polices must be

aligned with those of its parent institution (Roes, 2001).

Libraries can provide information systems that can effectively deliver quality educational

materials, which are readily accessible and useful. Digital libraries have been called on to take

care of providing search materials. A widely held belief is that digital libraries are the remedy to

improve library information retrieval.

Regarding consequences related to the lack of direct human contact, researchers would

likely want to see improved ways of retrieving information. Sources would be available right

from their desktop. Researchers, as virtual library users accessing online databases, catalogs, and

other Internet resources, are becoming more technologically savvy. It may not be beneficial to

researchers if they are unable to develop search skills and utilize the knowledge and skills of

librarians to help them locate the most appropriate resources. On the other hand, libraries risk

being bypassed by this technology and losing relevance to students and faculty if they do not

establish their presence in bibliographic instruction. Librarians need to be proactive. Then need

to insert links to resources and to library assistance within their classification domain in order to

retain visibility, to increase their relevance with researchers, and to show their ability to find

appropriate materials (Shank, 2006, Intro.).

Number 4: Adjustments to bibliographic content or classification of materials: This

category is essential as a response to users' needs. This category puts together all the tools that

can be reviewed and amended in the classification rules and schema that librarians use. Some

articles attempt to look at old standards in different ways, even how a library classification

system can help with scientific research because of its hierarchical design, thus helping students










Graf, William L. 2004. "In the critical zone: Geography at the U.S. Geological Survey."
The Professional Geographer. 56, no. 1:100-108.

Gluck, Myke. 1996. "Geospatial information needs of the general public: text, maps, and
users' tasks," in Geographic information systems and libraries: patrons, maps
and spatial information (eds. Smith, L. and Guck, M.).

Gurnitsky, Joanna. 2006. Try Google Earth:~~~~EEEEE~~~~EEEE a Magnificent Satellite View of the World.
Retrieved Fall 2006 from
http:.//netforbeginners. about.com/od/readerpicks/a/google_earth.hm

Harvard University Library. 2006. "Records for Geographic Headings," in Biblioguraphic
Standard~~dddsddddd~~~~ (p. 20), retrieved Fall 2006 from
http:.//hul .harvard. edu/cmtes/haac/HULB ibli ographi c_Standards. pdf .

Hiddenway. 2000(?). Map of "Continent of Arthom" from http://hiddenway .tripod.com

Hill, Linda L. 2006. "Representation of Geospatial Location," in Georeferencing: The
Geographic Associations of Information. MIT Press.

Hill, Linda L., et al. 2000. "Alexandria Digital Library: User evaluation studies and
system design," in Journal of the American Society for htfornzation Science. 51,
no.3:246-259.

Hill, Linda L. and Janee, Greg. [ 2004?]. The Alexandria Digital Library Project:
M\~etadat~~~ttttatttt~~~~ Development and Use retrieved Fall 2006 from.
http:.//www.alexandri a.ucsb .edu/~gj anee/archive/2004/metadata-chapter. pdf .

Hill, Linda L. and Zheng, Ki. 1999. Indirect geospatial referencing through place nantes
in the digital library: Alexandria Digital Library Experience 0I ithr Developing and
Insplententing Gazetteers.
http ://www.alexandria.ucsb .edu/~zheng/papers/asis99.pdf.

International Conference on the Principles and Future Development of AACR, 1997,
Toronto, Ont. 1998. The principles and future ofAACR, Jean Weihs, ed.,
Chicago: American Library Association.

John L;s Old Maps. 2000. "Detail from: A Map ofLouisiana and of the River
M~sississppi which appears to be from approx. 1710-20. fron:
http://www.j lindqui st. com/map s.html .

Joint Steering Committee (JSC) for Revision of AACR. April 24-28, 2005. Outcomes of
the M~eeting of the Joint Steering Committee, Chicago. Retrieved Fall 2007 from
http://www.coll ecti onscanada.ca/i sc/0 504out.html.









The spatial coverage of a cartographic source shares attributes with other information

sources, such as books and j ournals and sharing title and subj ect terms. Cartographic materials

will differ from these other formats that usually come in the shape of a rectangle, and they may

contain coordinates to identify the rectangle' s corners. Most, if not all, text-based information

systems have not used geographic codes for retrieving materials. Many map collections still rely

on the knowledge of their librarians to help patrons find what they are looking for. A demand

exists for a new powerful spatial information searching tool for improving the efficiency and

effectiveness of searching geographically referenced materials (Yu, 1999).

This digital age has made cartography and geographic information more integrated than

ever before, making spatial information more critical for representing traditional cartographic

manifestations. Librarians must be able not only to provide data which traditionally represented

cartographic documents, but now provide accompanying metadata from such sources that may

contain any sense of locality (Smits, 1999, p. 304).

Ideally, providing geographic coordinate information depends on the availability and

completeness of the metadata provided and also the discretion of the cataloger following policies

in place. Libraries are on the cusp of not needing to provide long bibliographic records with

publisher information, but must otherwise provide metadata that can be loaded and converted to

a database for indexing purposes (Welch & Williams, 1999, p. 353). But users fail to see that the

metadata has to originate somewhere and that standards must be adhered to.

Accuracy of data is important for maintaining uniformity and easy communication and

transportability/exportation of information. The following factors can all be considered as a

means of reducing errors and increasing accuracy when creating bibliographic information:










(Question 5) How do you think library listing (cataloging,
or description) of geographic materials can be improved
to assure you have done a thorough search of the library
catalog to satisfy your needs or requirements or, what
can be done to help you get the most out of your
search? Providing:
Category Count Percentage
More geographic headings 8 22%
More geographic notes 7 20%
More coordinates (lat/long)
info. 3 7%
Acquiring more print maps 6 15%
Increasing access to staff 2 5%
Improving geographic literacy 8 22%
Other *5 2%
N= 39
Other responses (5):
Create links to
FGDL
I haven't really noticed
Upload more map images to Internet
Digitized maps
Not sure unfamiliar with system







Question 6
Do you find an adequate
amount of materials of a
geographical nature in the
library database?
Category Count Percentage
Yes 9 26%
No 26 74%
N= 35



(Question 7) Would you prefer
searching latitude/Iongitude or
geographic placenames to find maps?
Or both?
Category Count Percentage
Latitudellongitude 2 6%
Place names 14 42%
Both 17 52%
N= 33



































To my family, all graduate students of Geography past and present and all sentient beings
everywhere









Publications of a cartographic nature include: atlases, maps, census documents, aerial

photographs, and satellite images. Geographic information system (GIS) is a system designed to

allow users to collect, manage and analyze spatially referenced information. It is critical to

understand economic development and have an increased awareness and knowledge of

geopolitics. It is a way of capturing, storing, analyzing and managing data which are spatially

referenced to the earth. It is necessary to use GIS to improve our understanding of natural

resources and the environment. Modern technology allows improved acquisition, distribution,

and utilization of geographic and cartographic data. An effort is underway to create an

infrastructure at different levels of government and private sectors to support applications of

spatial data in areas of transportation, agriculture, emergency response, environmental

management, and information technology, museum development and maintenance, and other

research related fields (Onsrud, 1995).

New technology has made the process of information research available through

digitization, which has benefited many disciplines. Without appropriate geographic elements,

bibliographic information will remain dispersed and inaccessible, and also dependent on inexact

description executed by untrained catalogers (Lai & Gillies, 1991).

Place names are readily defined by librarians through geographic subj ect headings, and

they are a way of describing location for library materials. They are useful for identifying spatial

information as locational or place name headings in text form (Woodruff & Plaunt, 1999). As

technology via the Internet has brought the world to our doorstep, people have become

increasingly more aware of what is out there, but usually needing to find out where exactly out

there is. Human activity of every nature requires space and exactitude, location becomes critical










Many developments in new technology and information sciences have formed the

foundation for a growing importance of spatial analysis. This is an exciting frontier that likely

will bring significant gains in the technical and theoretical skills and knowledge associated with

GI science. In order to accomplish some significant advance, data analysis and computation will

continue to be necessary. In addition, these advances are very likely to continue in an

interdisciplinary environment where traditional boundaries are brought down. The GIS and

library science communities can seize this opportunity and provide the means to develop

"spatially integrated" standards.

Outreach

Proposals and can be carried out to evaluate, promote, and increase the use of the library

in general and to advocate the benefits of using professional reference librarians. Users become

aware of the virtually endless availability of research materials accessible to them. Among the

findings from the readings, the research of relevant sources applies mostly to pedagogy,

educational and information technology, and other methods to increase library use, this work will

note the adage that more access points on a bibliographic record will improve query results for

the library user.

The idea discussed is to provide geographic coordinates to all map bibliographic records.

This work will present the problems faced with implementing this presumed helpful tool in

accomplishing the task of improving search queries. No attempt has been made to claim that

providing geographic coordinates to records will reverse the decline of use of libraries in this

new digital age. But there is a need to provide extensive information as more people are not

using librarians' services (Martell, 2005). It is important to note that library patrons and

researchers must learn that the sources exist and that the library has them. The end result is










LIST OF FIGURES


Figure page

4-1 Bounding boxes are shown as the gray (thin) lined boxes; convex hulls are
shown by the black (thick) lines and more closely follow the shape of the state
of California on the left and the city of San Jose on the right .............. ...................36

4-2 Antique map showing parts of Wisconsin and Michigan with unidentified
coordinate system and outdated place names (note "CANADA" over what is
present-day M ichigan)... ........... ...............38......

4-3 Examples of maps lacking conventional coordinate information. From upper
left clockwise: unidentified alphanumeric coordinate system (Attu, Alaska),
fantasy/imaginary map (Continent of Arthom), tourist map (Daman, India),
and aerial photograph of Key West, Fla. ............. ...............40.....

4-4 Sample of a georeferencing calculator for UF Libraries Search for Los
A ngeles. ............. ...............47.....

4-5 Sample screen accommodating link to expand search to geographic
coordinates. ............. ...............50.....

4-6 Sample screens accommodating geographic coordinate searches for points and
for bounding box (Qinchai Province, China)............... ...............50.

5-1 Sample of a border dispute of Kashmir region. Source:GNUFree
Documentation License. .........._.._... ...............52.._.._.. .....

A-1 Users' interest in a variety of formats as a percentage ........._..._... ........_.__........._68










progressive in thinking to move forward with this technology. Through cooperative efforts at

every level, it is important to make the necessary and, in some cases, overdue adjustments in

standards, procedures, cataloging rules, and information retrieval services among the

contributing and authoritative parties. These efforts will be for the benefit of all those needing

access to this information.

One positive--or perhaps negative--aspect to consider about information technology may

be that the user can never consider the work finished because it becomes more a set of

interdependent information. Thus layers upon layers of information will be a fit in different

sources, and these layers of information will need to be constantly updated and revised, as well

as the metadata infrastructure. At the same time, the advent of the Internet, its resource use, and

contribution have expanded beyond all expectations. The Internet is having a significant impact

on research work, thus making for a need to have an inventory of information and consequently

common standards.

The librarians' response to the spread of information, of course, is not free of challenges

which include a lack of familiarity with the technology, and the need to develop appropriate

content for the databases for both defining standards and gathering information while making the

data suitable for comparative work. The information science fields, whether library information

science or geographic information science, will be expanding their use more and more, as in

recent years. Geographers must again be the creators and users of the software programming and

application that will deal with the matter of spatial data. Teachers and librarians will take on the

responsibility of teaching future students and researchers the new skills necessary in conjunction

with the direction that information science is taking.









assumed that metadata and standard issues are of the technical nature. So these two fields must

collaborate to come up with new collaborative ideas or approaches to indexing geographically.

Traditionally, geography has been about gathering information in the field. The spatial

process researched by geographers has been acclaimed and used by closely related disciplines.

For example, urban geography deals with research and information on spatial processes, such as

urbanization and gentrification information that have been used in other academic fields. It is

difficult to deny that geography is a fundamental source of research information with a scientific

approach, but this comes with an expectation and a responsibility to make explanations and

policies regarding spatial processes easily understood. Geography must provide clear answers

and a clear direction to tackle these issues.

Geography can address how the collection, organization, presentation, and retrieval of

digitized information can be processed while at the same time providing and producing

geographic information by means of georeferenced spatial data. Geography curricula can be

developed to concentrate on making it easy to find items of interest and how to manipulate the

information in as many ways as possible, such as being able to re-compute data and create new

maps and datasets. In turn, the digital and physical map library becomes a tool for teaching.

Applied research must explore the potential of the software environment and develop tools by

designing prototypes.

John Pickles, a distinguished geography professor, attempted to answer how geographic

information can help libraries in his paper Demystify/ing the Persistent Ambiguity of GIS a~s 'tool '

vs. 'science '. Pickles states that albeit GIS has arrived and lived up to its promises, new

technologies continue to enhance what is achievable and accessible to more people (1997,









CHAPTER 3
IVETHODS OF ANALYSIS

Approaches Promoting Library Use

This research will demonstrate a need for further proposals and proj ects in order to

evaluate, promote and increase the use of the library, and to advocate the benefits of using

professional reference librarians. This research will also make researchers aware of the

"limitless" availability of materials accessible to them. Librarians and library paraprofessionals,

as with teachers, must see how technology can support standards, facilitate library use, and make

learning interesting for students and researchers. Technology must enhance lessons taught in

order for the lessons to be effective.

Seven maj or themes, or approaches, identified as methods to encourage library patrons to

visit, participate, and use the library with more frequency. Three of the seven categories

(underlined) kept appearing in the course of this research that mostly related to improving access

to and retrieval of materials specifically while simultaneously increasing use of the libraries. The

seven maj or themes are:

1. Improved library/bibliographic instruction
2. Surveys/evaluations and user behavior observations
3. Improving virtual access to materials
4. Adjustments to bibliographic content or classification of materials
5. Usinn non-library, neonraphic technologies -- Need for human factor
6. Promoting (information) literacy -- Promoting policies that encourage use
7. Reviewing/improving physical barriers/design


Number 3: Improvinn virtual access to materials: One of the strongest cases is for user

awareness and acceptance of digital libraries. A promotion of basic terminology and ease of use

navigation must occur. Users must be made to feel less overwhelmed by the increasing number

of materials available. Making users aware of the difficulties of logging into a digital

environment will also help. Looking into the usability issues and challenges, users will encounter










improving users' access to information whether they take it for granted or appreciate it as much

as a librarian.

Researchers need to search for specific locations in a database and to retrieve relevant

items based on coordinates provided. The searching and retrieval has to be done efficiently and

effectively, even when the scale of the database reaches the astronomical terabyte size. Not only

do the items need to be digitized but also indexed appropriately so they can be retrieved (Larson,

1996).

The map librarian have the responsibility of promoting the use of the map library and

increasing the value of the collection. Dawn Youngblood, curator at Southern Methodist

University, outlined the following recommendations:

When new cartographic materials arrive, inform members of the
appropriate discipline.
If you have foreign language maps that no one uses, contact professors
and students in the language departments and make them aware of their
existence and usefulness.
Give public speaking presentations with maps or PowerPoint presentations
with scanned maps at informal talks or brown bags.
When patrons enter the map collection, ask them if they are aware of the
other resources in the collections.
Offer patrons courses on map making or using GIS to create their own
maps (2006, pp 62-63).

Map librarians need to assess their users' needs if they are to find digital solutions to their

inquiries, and they need to think "digital" to start identifying the kinds of queries which can work

better with electronic technology, as opposed to the traditional and conventional paper map-

based solutions. Digitally based electronic cartographic materials have the potential to deliver

more efficient information than the map sheet (Parry, 1995).

Besides queries by geographic coordinates, users may be interested in other measured

information, such as altitudes, orientation, gradient, distances, scale, distance between points and










Geographic coordinates, however, along with the place name feature, are effective in

selecting different places with the same name and associating different names for the same place.

The idea that GIS will allow data with coordinates to be visualized as map layers in a common

coordinate system conversion from other standards. Multiple map layers, showing other

divisions by topic, among them history and topography, for example, will be superimposed in a

single viewing environment. Coordinates for place names in subj ect headings will allow for

retrieving maps by clicking on a referenced dot.

Additionally, geographical coordinates will be calculated in the form of nearby searches

by perhaps defining a radius around a center point, making this useful for border and frontier

studies along with studies of near neighbor effects. With today's technology, the linking of

online library catalogs with online gazetteers alone could transform geographical information

searching throughout the libraries and the Internet (Buckland, 2004).

Searching a geographically indexed database assumes that the searcher is able to specify

what he seeks. Furthermore, the searcher will be able to input the information in some type of

query language or provide coordinates in some way, but not necessarily in some standard query

formulation. Pointing at interactive maps can give the desired results of the coordinates, and they

can be used to formulate the search by providing that information to the spatial query (Larson,

1995, p. 91).

The University of Florida library catalog can include a link to a different window that

will allow the user to search by bounding box or center point coordinates (Figures 4-5 and 4-6).

The researchers using the library catalog would be able to search the database by entering

coordinate information.











Users' interests in a variety of formats as
a percentage
Census data

demographic
information
o digitized data

0 GIS materials

Statistical documents

H aerial photos

satellite images

O other (atlas, cd's, etc


Figure A-1. Users' interest in a variety of formats as a percentage


A strong number of those surveyed also wanted to reinforce their search queries with
both place names and coordinate information. Given an opportunity to express other problems
that they encounter when searching the library database, some recommended more indexing of
topographic maps, creating links to the Florida Geographic Data Library (FGDL), which is
maintained at the University of Florida's GeoPlan Center, plus a GIS Research and Teaching
Facility that is the mechanism for distributing satellite imagery, aerial photographs, and spatial
(GIS) data throughout the state of Florida (FGDL.org).

Clearly the results largely reflect graduate student participation and needs. A significant
amount of inclination is shown toward digital format rather than paper materials, which probably
reflects what most people are looking for these days. So an electronic search by geographic
coordinates or bounding boxes is indeed a logical idea. Unfortunately, faculty and researchers
were not as emphasized, and more information would have been useful from other departments
(i.e., forestry, archeology, anthropology, and other users of GIS).













(Question 8) What other problems do you generally or
specifically encounter when searching the library
database for geographic/cartographic materials?
Have not visited
Need more helpers
Metadata not available before downloading files
Lack of experience with the process
Not adequate materials
Don't use the library
I do not use the library databases. Maybe what is suitable be more widely publicized
I use the Internet, not the library catalog
Keyword searches are pathetic. It is very difficult to find materials.
Mostly perform regional searches so place names work just fine
Lack of certain aerial photographic series
Not knowing where to look or search for information
Should have indexes (online) for togographic sets with just a single record/call number
I'm new, I haven't started to do this too much yet
I used only once the Map Library
Shortage of data
Slow response from server, hard to find some images for different years
Printing/scanning maps
Never really used it, ashamed to say. I always go to FDGL for .shps and other info
on Florida, but my study region is FL.
It's hard to navigate the whole UF catalog system anyways
I work the GeoPlan Center and get most of my data from there or Labins?
Map Library is great!









will be necessary to round out the numbers. These issues can range from what degree of

propagation of errors from an original source that can be minimized to making a decision of what

enumeration and manipulation of data to keep.

Comparing Coordinate Representations

Center point representation contains one latitude line and one longitude line each that

intersect at a single point. It is the standard used within the Geographic Names Information

System (GNIS), developed by the U.S. Geological Survey in cooperation with the U.S. Board on

Geographic Names (BGN). The GNIS also contains information about physical and cultural

geographic features in the United States. The database holds federally recognized names of

features, and defines the location of the feature, including its geographic coordinates. It is easy to

work with the GNIS to find features on maps, but GNIS is not very good for figuring out the size

or shape of a geographic feature or for analytical work that helps describe parts of a larger item,

collected works, or sophisticated data and--including the list of names of topographic maps.

Additionally, GEOnet Names Server (GNS), also from BGN, is the supported database for the

standard names of all foreign places, as GNIS is for domestic. The data contain variant spellings

with cross-references to help in finding place names. The data also continue to add the native

spelling of place names (USGS, 2007).

There are obvious advantages to adding geographic coordinates in a specific library data

field for geographic places but problems that still need addressing include uniformity and a

universal protocol that includes deciding on what system to use. The decimal form may be

supplied instead of degrees, minutes, and seconds of data for sufficient advantages of retrieval

and interoperability. Converting the coded form of degrees, minutes and seconds to decimal form

and including both systems must weighed for benefit of ease of use versus the time and labor

involved in providing such converted or dual information. The Board on Geographic Names









attempts to indicate all resources available. Provisions are to be made for circulation agreements

and access to virtual electronic collections, and also have some way of accessing materials not

owned by the library. Policies regarding access will be appropriately disseminated to library

users (ACRL, 2006).

Anglo-American Cataloguing Rules (AACR) are designed for use in the construction of

library record catalogs. These rules cover the description and access points for all library

materials, including those of a cartographic nature. The publication deals with the provision of

information describing an item being cataloged, and determining what subj ect headings or access

points will be used as descriptive information on the catalog for the users. Since 1967, AACR

has been used by library professionals with highly developed cataloging content standards, or an

agreed upon way of processes and procedures. Revisions in the standards since 1978, known as

AACR2, clearly define and provide and examples of the cataloging process extending with

clearly defined rules and practical examples. These rules and examples represent standards that

apply to all types of resources which now include metadata formats (ALA, 1998).

Unfortunately, as information technology has advanced through recent years leaving

librarians and information people trying to keep up, more information has also tried to keep pace

to help professionals interpret the rules--but with mixed results. Other practical and authoritative

cataloging how-to books were published, designed to interpret and explain AACR2 changes as

information science continued to develop. For instance, Maxwell's Handbook for AACR2 (1997)

illustrates and applies the latest cataloging rules to the MAchine-Readable Cataloging (MARC)

record for every type of information format. Focusing on integrating resources, MARC

addresses programs for cooperative cataloging and the cataloging needs of electronic books and

digital reproductions of physical items, such as books and maps.









CHAPTER 6
SUMMARY AND CONCLUSION

From the findings, library staff needs to work toward a common goal of seeking how to

use information technology to support policy, facilitate library use, and make learning interesting

for students and researchers desiring to use the library as their primary resource of information.

To complement, or rather keep pace with, the increased Internet use and meet users' demands

while lessening existing anxieties or apprehensions, library staff may also have to encourage

users to take the plunge and walk into a library. Educational technology coupled with

information science can be used to enhance teaching and develop methods to increase patron

library use.

This work is written to provide an understanding of the work that is involved in

cataloging and providing metadata for cartographic materials and the factors that contribute to

thematic errors. To demonstrate what is involved in cataloging maps, it is necessary to

understand the need for providing spatial data as the basis for geographic information retrieval.

This work concentrated on one aspect of spatial data: geographic coordinates. The ideal is to

provide coordinate information for the purpose of facilitating document retrieval while

concurrently encountering, resolving, or minimizing any of the following problems: accuracy,

consistency, conversion, and unavailable data.

The development and use of spatial information and metadata cataloging patterns have

depended on and grown along with the advances in information technology--with what computer

memory has allowed. The recent library information shift has created a crisis in the

establishment of standards to keep up with the changes. These information developments in turn

affect the information that is input at the local level at the University Library. The AACR2 rules

have given way to a much delayed introduction to new standards: Resource Description and









As information technology continues to rapidly change with the Internet and digitization

of materials, a strong need has arisen to update standards yet again. While there was a process to

start new revisions to create AACR3, as changes were being addressed, a decision was made to

change the approach and start new standards. Work on the new standard began in 2004 and by

2005 a new approach was agreed to. The decision was made to adopt the title: RDA: Resource

Description and Access. The reason for the change was to approach cataloging from the digital

environment instead of the previous textual analog environment. This change is an attempt to

include guidelines and instructions for description and access for both digital and analog

resources that will also be used in a variety of digital environments (Bowen, 2005).

While new information technologies have raised questions and concerns followed by

calls for fundamental revisions and discussion of the history and principles of AACR, a j oint

steering committee for revisions of these rules addressed these issues. Concurrently, this

committee is taking into account present and future trends in information resources and

information management. Many meetings took place to review the underlying principles of the

rules, with a view to determining whether fundamental rule revision is appropriate and to advice

on the direction of those revisions (ICPFDA, 1998).

Additionally, a separate Anglo-American Cataloguing Committee for Cartographic

Materials is specifically in place to help deal with the collection and description of maps and

other geographic-related materials. Representatives from member institutions and associations

are recognized as experts on the bibliographic control of cartographic materials. The

Calrtoguraphic materials: a manual of interpretation for AACR2 (Mangan, 2005) was produced

by this committee. Its aim is to help catalogers interpret and apply the rules given in AACR2 and

additional information useful for atlases, early cartographic materials, electronic resources, and










may be specified or coupled with a geographic/regional name, usually borrowed from an

important adj acent area along with geographic type to serve as a substitute for regions with no

established, known, or authoritative place name.

Regardless of what form of spatial query the database uses--geographic name or

coordinate, or both--common representations of spatial data can be utilized by developing a well-

defined uniformity in the description of the material. Providing spatial queries will allow

appropriate and consistent treatment of the material to help in development of descriptive

information for researchers and other information seekers while serving as a method to reduce

errors in information. The terms geographic or spatial queries imply querying a spatially

indexed database based on relationships between particular items in the bibliographic or

metadata library index record, such as geographic subj ect headings, class numbers or geographic

area code within a particular coordinate. The query can be defined with other relationships, such

as intersection, containment, boundary, adj acency, and proximity to the area of the relevant map

sought (De Floriani, 1993).

Providing the latitude and longitude with complete degree, minute, and second

information reduces the margin of error and offers the closest approximation to the true

measurement of the area on a map being represented. Maps will sometimes either leave out

coordinates, or if they do include them, they may provide them using different systems than ones

commonly used. The cataloger will have to rely on providing approximations for maps with no

coordinate information, and will have to decide whether or not a conversion is needed to provide

an agreed-upon measurement. The cataloger will also have to consider whether or not to include

information as it appears on the material in addition to converted data (Larson, 1996).









University and research libraries will use their digital collections for class work and

research. With electronic access, libraries and university programs will share information more

effectively with other universities and learned institutions. Geographic cataloging has been

important in describing traditional library materials. However, traditional library cataloging

elements lack certain descriptive information that meets the needs of a new generation of savvy

Internet users who are locating spatial resources and demanding search alternatives. Traditional

library cataloging is struggling to adapt to the needs of locating resources and establishing

standards (i.e., the term wetlandst~t~lt~t~lt~t~lt defined by the United States Geological Society (USGS) as a

vegetated area that is inundated or saturated by surface or ground water for a significant part of

the year). These standards may be identified to other users as: backwaters, bayous, bogs, fens,

mangrove swamps, marshes, mires, mud flats, peat lands, salt marshes, sloughs, and swamps.

They can include broader terms as biogeographic regions or narrower terms, such as bays, guts,

lakes, playas, and streams as found in the Library of Congress Subj ect Headings (LCSH).

However, traditional library cataloging has provided a level of refinement for information

retrieval that is highly successful for manual retrieval of bibliographic items.

A geographic approach to providing coordinates and other spatial information is needed

because a more complex set of requirements than traditional catalog-based systems would be

useful to many experienced spatial data users. The greatest value to this approach will be the

ability to interact with catalog-based systems and simultaneously be used over a global network

environment. The trend in this approach is the development of browsers that allow searchers to

graphically browse datasets from one or more databases.









BIOGRAPHICAL SKETCH

Jorge Gonzalez received a Bachelor of Arts degree in December 2003 from the University

of Florida, Gainesville. He worked full time at the University of Florida, George A. Smathers

Libraries as a science and map cataloger while finishing both his undergraduate and masters

degree.

His academic and professional interests include demographic information and library and

metadata standards.









search engines to retrieve records using coordinates. But currently old systems are being adapted

so more recent library software allows such searches in the collections represented.
















Figure 4-1. Bounding boxes are shown as the gray (thin) lined boxes; convex hulls are shown by
the black (thick) lines and more closely follow the shape of the state of California on
the left and the city of San Jose on the right. Source:Larson & Fronteira, 1994.

Scale information shown on maps is provided by the cataloger in two locations and in

different formats. One of the MARC fields (i.e., components or pieces of information defined for

a specific indexing application) used to display this information is the 034 (Coded Cartographic

Mathematical Data) field, containing data for scale and coordinates. Scale information and

coordinates, when provided, are presented in numerical form, though coordinate values also

include the abbreviation in textual form of the hemispheres being covered (Andrew, 2003, p. 42).

Also, coordinate data values may be given either in the form of hdddmmss (hemi sphere-degrees-

minutes-seconds) or as decimal degrees. The degree, minute, and second sub-elements are each

right justified and unused positions contain zeros (Library of Congress, 2006).

Example of a map covering most of the Earth in degrees/minutes/seconds:

hdddmmss (hemisphere, degree, minutes, seconds)
034 1_ a ||b 22000000 ||d W1800000 ||e E1800000 ||f NO840000 ||g SO700000










APPENDIX B
SURVEY RESULTS





(Question 1) Are you?
Category Count Percentage
Undergrad 1 2%
Graduate 35 85%
Faculty 3 7%
Staff 0
Visitor 2 5%
Other 0
N= 41








(Question 2) While searching the library catalog
do you look for (and find or use) any of the
following information or formats of publication?
Category Count Pe rce ntage
Census data 9 10%
Demographic information 6 7%
Digitized data 13 14%
GIS materials 16 17%
Statistical documents 6 7%
Aerial photos 18 20%
Satellite images 14 15%
Other (Atlas, CD's, etc.) 10 11%
N= 92


(Question 3) Do you find an
adequate amount of materials
of a geographical nature in the
library database?
Category Count Percentage
Yes 11 27%
No 10 24%
Unsure 20 49%
N= 41






























O 2007 Jorge A. Gonzalez










whether the value may have been placed through historical events or other functions that led to

national identification (Wood, 2000). An effort must be made by both librarian and researcher to

identify the geographic coordinates of the disputed area for searching and retrieving said

materials.






~Gilgit Agency
Sha fsam
RT ~Vall









Figre5-. amle f brdr isptofKsmrrgn.Suc:N reDcmnain
License. ~itan 5i
Theabiityto ndestnd eogaphc corinatsi critica tomp edig A hegi

reference remains signific~antt rin asfr oaigpacs orintswl oniu en
useulin hedigtiedreal andavalabe slonsteItresaalbe(igr,20,p

36). ~Zbd Howver man oftesail eaaaeemnsaertree nmnnrnqet
indiidul sstes. herfor, lmittios mustbentedt rvdn ordnt nomto

bohfo wti h crorpic ite an i salse irr sadrs loiutb




notued51 that l adtonal liittons existed onc tahe information i porovied.Ure ouent









indexing will not restrict researchers to just digitized databases but also to the improvement of

analog materials or the physical library (Smits, 2000, p. 509).

Geographic headings consist of two types: jurisdictional and non-jurisdictional.

Jurisdictional headings are most commonly used as corporate body entries. These entries are

names of groups or governments associated as an entity on bibliographic records, making them

capable of being identified as author of a material cataloged while they can also be used as

subject headings. These subj ects are established according to the rules in AACR2, Chapter 23.

Traditionally, names of countries and administrative divisions within countries, such as

provinces, states, counties, and cities, take on a jurisdictional heading entry (HIUL, 2006), (e.g.,

eventually being able to group countries as East and West Germany into one group: Germany).

Geographical information is found in many forms whether visual (maps, aerial photos,

and remote sensing images) or textual (surveys, reports, technical papers). Although geographic

information has been indexed spatially through GIS, reports and other text materials have relied

for decades on the indexing of library catalog methods. As libraries continue to digitize more

visual and textual information, a greater need has arisen to complement this information with

spatially referenced headings. Geography must be viewed as information space for the simple

reason that digitized information is seen as spatial (Cai, 2001).

According to Larsgaard (1996), "With very few exceptions, every reference question for

planetospatial data starts out with location, (p.28)." So, it has quickly been determined that

bounding coordinates are essential. For spatial data in digital form, this information is often in

the header or derivable from inside the digital data. For aerial photographs, deriving spatial

information is a nightmare because you have no geographic references come into play. Software










a polygon within which the searcher would expect the data to exist. Authoritative database

systems, such as the Alexandria Digital Library, U.S. Gazetteer (U. S. Census Bureau), GNS, and

GNIS, offer one or more of these geometric constraint methods to users. Other spatial constraint

methods currently used to specify a satellite path and frame number for remotely sensed imagery

or specify a tile of a hierarchical order (Frank, 1994, p. 90).

The thematic data issues for using and providing metadata include a constant awareness

and knowledge of current data. Data needing revisions and updating pose a challenge with

missing data in regard to compensating or noting the absence of the data.









inclined users. At the same time librarians can pass this knowledge on to those technically

challenged. Digital advances have created a decline in the use of libraries while increasing the

need of real person/real-time help. But libraries will continue their role as research institutions

even with the increase in accessing materials via the Internet. The library will need to adjust by

not just being an immovable building but a dynamic collection of material able to come to the

researcher (Rusbridge, 1998).

Using digital libraries will help in teaching and learning by integrating the use of the

digital library and introducing the concept of spatial reference to facilitate retrieval of

information for researchers. A goal of the Alexandria Digital Earth Prototype proj ect (ADEPT) is

to make primary resources in geography useful for academic instruction in ways that will

promote inquiry learning. The ADEPT education and evaluation team found that professors

desired the ability to search by concept (erosion, continental drift, and glaciation) as well as

geographic location. Resources in spatial digital libraries are typically described by location.

Enhancements regarding searching capabilities will include the ability to contribute and to share

personal collections of resources and capability to manipulate data and images. Students learn

science through inquiries that imitate what scientists practice (Borgman, 2004, p. 179).

Though they are using GIS, few libraries have focused on the technology. New

technology must be used effectively but not without the traditional skills of librarianship. The

library professional must evaluate user needs, select data, prepare and catalog data for users, and

also design, serve, and manage public services. In fact, concerning GIS-based services, librarians

have discovered that they cannot do it alone. More than any other service, GIS requires

collaboration in the library and partnerships with outside entities, specifically geographers, due

to its interdisciplinary approaches.









Access (RDA) to tackle the new challenges in describing digital resources in the new

Information Age (JSC, 2005). However, it may be a long time before the number of solutions

can be reduced or before a single solution can be found or agreed upon in regard to providing

spatial information to library records, and maybe even longer when finally applied at the

University of Florida Libraries. Despite these minor setbacks, library science will continue to

have a workable information infrastructure using the latest methods and sources for providing

and locating spatial resources.

Despite some aforementioned unresolved issues, including competing online geographic

gazetteers and a shortage of new standards to keep up with technology, catalogers can forge

ahead knowing that applying the practices mentioned in this work will be one way to confront

the problems and reduce errors. The ideal query situation includes being able to search most, if

not all, maps in a library collection by way of geographic coordinates, and thus find every map

that can be pinpointed within that coordinate range.

The map collection database at the library must be able to go beyond the service of

gazetteers and provide many layers of maps in an instant. It must be understood that providing

coordinates cannot be a panacea. But the coordinates must work in conjunction with place names

and feature topic names and probably beyond to a subj ect/topic thesaurus and hierarchical

relational data, that is, planet, hemisphere, continent, country, primary level administration,

secondary level administration, city, neighborhood, among other geographic regions.

It is hoped that identifying the hurdles here, as well as those that information providers

and researchers will encounter along the way as they are put into practice, will make it easier in

the near future to keep up with the fast-paced changes in information technology. Librarians

must not be frustrated by the number of problems to be overcome, but instead be resilient and









The creation of print databases, as digitized materials, and the metadata to accompany the

materials, while applying GIS to create databases, have shifted from what was a static geography

of book production to an active spatial form of information. Geographic concepts have taken the

forefront due to the ability of GIS to provide attention to different academic fields by layering

information that contributes to the broader understanding of what is communicated. Conversely

GIS addresses the needs of specific studies, such as demography, economic history, and social

history. Geographic Information Systems would provide a link to disparate sources and allow

comparison and close examination of various print materials.

Map classification is a process that involves an orderly and systematic assignment of

each item to one and only one class number within a system of mutually exclusive and non-

overlapping classes (e.g., where G4410 will be assigned to Mexico or G8200 to Africa and up

and down the geographically related range). This process must be systematic and orderly:

systematic because it mandates consistent application of these principles within a framework of a

prescribed ordering of reality, and orderly because it carries out an established set of principles

that govern the structure of established classes. While a scheme itself can be established by

anyone, purpose and meaningful organization must be considered. Also to be taken into account

a history and tradition of materials indexed under the system with room for amending and

improving as the need arises that librarians most likely are qualified to provide (Smith & Sproles,

2004, p. 23).

Maps are defined mainly by using bounding-box coordinates and point locations within a

radius of a point, in addition to administrative subdivision, or locality description, using, when

necessary, a standard thesaurus such as the Library of Congress Subj ect Headings (LCSH). This









metadata, especially if the information is supplied. Despite their common use, bounding boxes

are more complicated than they first appear. Bounding boxes are one of a number of methods for

describing the extent of a map dataset. The bounding box is supposed to represent "the limits of

coverage of a data set, but the meaning of limits is not clearly specified in the Content Standard

for Digital Geospatial Metadata. The phrase that spatial is special applies to this humble

representation (Caldwell, 2005).

A continual cooperative effort has been made among the national, state, and local library

communities and organizations to identify, address, and solve these problems. Currently, many

bibliographic databases, which use MARC formatted data, limit users to searching for

information based on the spatial metadata supplied. Despite some apparent shortcomings,

MARC continues to be the primary choice for integrating bibliographic data in the library

community due to its versatility and well-established nature, that is, it is true and tested (Frank,

1994, p. 90).

The MARC's geographical searching limitations include restricting the search parameters

to a particular location in space. The searching is done by specifying a place name or by applying

geographic coordinates, if supplied by the cataloger or already available on the record. Place

names can be ambiguous, having different meanings among different users (e.g., Las Malvinas v.

Falkland Islands), and can suffer from variations in spelling (e.g., Colombia v. Columbia). Place

names are commonly used as a retrieval key in most bibliographic systems (Hill et al., 2000).

However, this work is about providing and establishing uniformity in coordinate systems.

For a map, one of the most common methods of describing spatial constraints is to

specify a center point location and search radius, or, preferably, to specify diagonal corner

locations of a minimum bounding rectangle or box, or also to specify the locations of vertices of









Abstract of Thesis Presented to the Graduate School
of the University of Florida in Partial Fulfillment of the
Requirements for the Degree of Master of Arts

ANALYSIS OF SPATIAL INFORMATION TO IMPROVE RETRIEVAL OF
CARTOGRAPHIC MATERIALS BY PROVIDING GEOGRAPHIC COORDINATE
INFORMATION

By

Jorge Antonio Gonzalez

December 2007

Chair: Barbara McDade
Major: Geography

This work presents research Eindings on how geographic coordinates can improve the

retrieval of library materials at the University of Florida Libraries while attempting to provide

spatial information to library bibliographic records for more efficient access of cartographic

materials. Retrieval and accuracy problems arise because maps are not always published with

coordinates. The researcher can follow library cataloging rules in order to provide coordinates on

bibliographic records, and interpolate numbers by following strict guideline standards. Bounding

boxes and center point coordinates are key components in the library catalog record.

Additionally, GIS has universal applications that apply to interdisciplinary studies and

international cooperation in regard to establishing standards.

The obj ective proposed in this work is to see how spatial information through the use of

geographic coordinates can help not only to read and manipulate cartographic data but also to

help organize other library materials. By improving library classification schemes of electronic

and digitized materials and also enhancing traditional classification and retrieval mechanisms

and standards, University of Florida Libraries' catalogers can keep up with the researchers'

demands for better access to materials. The UF Libraries can then attempt to shift to newly










Jue, Dean K. 1996. "Implementing GIS in the Public Library Arena," in Geographic
Information Systems and Libraries: Patrons, Maps, and Spatial Information, "
Smith & Gluck., eds. Urbana-Champagin: Univ. of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign,
Graduate School of Library and Information Science.

Kearns, Robin. 200 1. "(Dis)spirited Geography?," in Journal of Geography in Higher
Education. 25, no. 3:299-309.

Lai, P. and Gillies. C. F. 1991. "The impact of geographical information systems on the
role of spatial data libraries," in hIternational Journal of Geographical
Information Science.

Larsgaard, Mary Lynette. 1978. Map Librarianship: An Introduction. Littleton, CO:
Libraries Unlimited.

Larsgaard, Mary Lynette. 1996. "Cataloging planetospatial data in digital form: Old
wine, new bottles--new wine, old bottles," in Geographic information systems
and libraries: patrons, maps and spatial information (eds. Smith, L. and Gluck,


Larson, R.R. 1996. "Geographic information retrieval and spatial browsing," in
Geographic information systems and libraries: patrons, maps, and spatial
information : [papers presented at the 1995 Clinic on Library Applications of Data
Processing, April 10-12, 1995]: 81-124. Retrieved Fall 2005 from
http://www. ideals. uiuc. edu/bitstream/21 42/41 6/2/Larson. pdf .

Larson, R., and Frontiera, P.. 2004. Ranking and Representation for Geographic
Information Retrieval. Paper presented at the Workshop on Geographic
Information Retrieval, ACM~SIGIR 2004, begic/JI~ UK

Lesk, M. 1989. What to do when there 's too much information from Conference on
Hypertext and Hypermedia '89 Proceedings. New York, ACM Press.

Library of Congress. Network Development and MARC Standards Office. 2006. M~ARC
21 Concise Format for Biblioguraphic Data, Number and Code Fields (01X-04X),
034-Coded Cartographic Mathematical Data.
http ://www.loc.gov/marc/bibliographic/ecbdnumb.html#mrcb034.

Lubas, Rebecca L. 2003. "The Evolution of Bibliographic Control of Maps," Cataloging
and Classification Quarterly, 35:3/4.

Lundgren, Jimmie and Gonzalez, Jorge A. 2004. "Recording geographic coordinates," in
M~ARC Discussion Paper no. 2006-DP01 from
http://www.loc.gov/marc/marbi/2006/2006-dp0.html.









information. This work will therefore focus on the benefits and uses of providing geographic

coordinates to library bibliographic records of a cartographic nature.

The basic information discussed will concentrate on providing geographic coordinates to

library map records. Libraries seek to organize everything, including the geographic nature of

materials, in a way where a researcher will find explicit location classification central to his

queries. Indexing and searching, and--for the researcher--finding are fundamental operations in

making retrieval of materials more efficient. The cataloging goal in libraries, including

cartographic materials, is for the cataloger to prepare the material in hand for its most accurate

accessibility by indexing each document from established nationally and internationally

recognized standards.

Searching for cartographic materials, as with other library materials, may be done directly

by examining shelved items or by searching vicariously via databases in the online catalog.

Cataloging is the most fundamental operation of indexing library materials (Dillon & Jul, 1996).

This action recognizes groups of classes of obj ects, as in cartographic materials, via map cabinet

or shelf placement order and the classification schema. Library classification will help the

researcher use a number of different devices--enhanced with geographic coordinates--for

retrieving materials from the physical collection or from digitized information.

This work will demonstrate a need to react to the changes occurring in information

technology by looking at the way libraries, and cataloging methods specifically, are using spatial

referencing to enhance or improve library research. This work will offer a systematic approach to

providing coordinate information based on established guidelines followed by discussing the

issues involved in providing them.









Geolibraries have both geographic and digital information, while digitization is the

direction that information is headed since the spatial information being produced needs

geographers to organize and access it. The fast movement in technology in regard to spatial-data

infrastructure has brought libraries and geography together like two fast trains about to crash into

each other. This technology has put many ad hoc groups racing to come up with a common

language for new common goals.

With the rapid developments in the digitization of maps and other library print materials

and also the creation of Internet networks and databases, access to geographical information is

increasing at a surprising rate. The technological environment has developed so that it can

facilitate seemingly complicated spatial operations. Digitized maps and spatial data from other

digitized materials have been coded to provide information for general purposes. This basic use

allows the use of the Internet for easily downloaded information from around the world, and it is

not unusual for researchers and other Web users to acquire real-time observational data.

One fact stands out among the discussed pros and cons: geographic referencing is here to

stay and has become a fixture in 21st century libraries just as automated catalogs and multimedia

collections have been available for quite a while. New ways need to be used to index the

information that technology has made available to researchers--but not without the benefits of

traditional skills of librarianship. The library professional must evaluate user needs, select data,

prepare and catalog data for users, and design, serve, and manage public services. In fact, if there

is anything significant that librarians have discovered about georeferencing their materials, it is

that they cannot do it alone. More than any other service, spatial information and GIS are perfect

opportunities for libraries to partner with outside entities, specifically geographers.









The availability of spatial searching capabilities allows for interoperable services. For

instance, Larsgaard (1978) identified four methods of providing geographic coding, or

"geocoding" for spatial representation:

1. Using explicit boundary delineations in mathematical form, (stating plane
coordinates or latitude and longitude values)
2. Using nominal values that do not indicate spatial relationships among entities
(place names)
3. Using ordinal values to indicate relative positions of spatial units within some
defined system, such as census tracts
4. Using unique designations for undefined or implicitly defined locations, such as
zip codes

One of the important contributions to geocoding is the benefit to multiple applications.

All coordinate-based implementations can be translated to other coordinate-based

implementations, albeit with the risk of losing positional accuracy. Although coordinate values

can also be translated to place names by arbitrarily or authoritatively assigning names to sets of

coordinates, many, if not all, cartographic materials, such as aerial photographs, satellite images,

and antique maps, do not have such assigned names. The transportability of the information is

from or to different sources or the information needs to be consolidated to a same location

identified differently by different sources (e.g., USPS, Sanborn, U.S. Census). On the other hand,

a daunting task identifies, digitizes and codes all areas identified on a map. So there is a trade-off

as to the level of accuracy your information can be (Sears, 2004).

Map Services and Mapping Tools

This section will attempt to look at the different available databases to provide a variety

of ways of searching and providing results. This section will also explain how libraries can

benefit from the services they provide to improve a library's online catalog.

Google Maps is a service offering powerful, user-friendly mapping technology. This

technology includes integrated business search results to help find business locations and contact









Cartographic materials, including maps, atlases, and satellite images, are cataloged

according to the latest national standards for descriptive content and punctuation. These national

standards are included, as previously mentioned, in the latest revision of AACR, Second Edition,

Second Revision, and Cartographic Materals: A Manual oflnterpretation for AACR2, 2002

Revision (2003). Local standards and variations to more specific rules are also taken into

consideration, usually applied to special proj ects or formats and recorded online for the benefit

of the department staff and to maintain uniformity and accuracy.

These standards call for taking the information from the map or source itself or the

principal sheet for a set of maps. If finding the source fails, the searcher may use the container or

other accompanying material, in that order, as the source of information. Important information

that is used in the description of a map includes: titless, authorss, geographic subj ect headings

(place names) represented on the map, date(s), physical description, scale, projection, type of

relief, and geographic coordinates.

Geographic coordinates are useful and important in their ability to precisely specify

positions on the earth's surface. Their uses include comparing positions, calculating distances,

and, in general, assistance in navigating from one point or place to another.

Cataloging work and the creation of metadata is detail-oriented. The following factors

must be taken into account in order to reduce the number of errors as much as possible:

a. Exactness of measurement or description of material in hand
b. Degree of correspondence between the data and the real world
c. Authoritative control of the input data
d. Reliable sources for the data and the processing steps it takes to carry out the work
e. Degree to which the data represent the world at the present moment

Accuracy, or completeness, can be measured by the discrepancy between the encoded and the

actual value of an attribute or by the number or lack of errors. In turn, this completeness can


































|Gieoref Calculatnor

Figure 4-4. Sample of a georeferencing calculator for UF Libraries Search for Los Angeles.

ArcGIS contains a tool that allows geographic interfaces to bibliographic citations and

library records offering graphic alternatives to searching text strings of place names. The

ArcView's hotlink tool permits linking to external data utilizing a point for each of the place

names created from the associated latitude and longitude fields. Using this functionality, the user

can look at a map, click on a point in an area, and retrieve relevant bibliographic records in a

new window. The same type of Universal Resource Locator (URL) search can be created for any

library catalog or database that is capable of linking to remotely generated URLs (Wright &

Urban, 1996).

Database Discussion

Maps are an integral part of data researchers' need for emphasizing the relationships

between place, time, and subj ect in the study of culture, environment, architecture, engineering,


Georeferencing Calculator



L**i~ 111T. I*I.1..i .1 .1 ,-il1* I II II I1.1 E


Libraries









S35.37333 -1 18.8406i 8 9.930 I Calcullate
dlegree~s minutes secrnims~nearest seconldCI m1O35.373330-11l8.840680(NAD 27) Northl American












Opt on 1: Search for words


and .-ii -.- MI
[hide other search options]
Lirnit your search further by:
Locatfort lau 5a
Fon-ner: In a
Language:(M.L
Published from (year): 1 10t. I

Option 2: Boolean Searching:
ase OR, NOT Irwbetwee words; AND is 56surised. Use panenltineSes fo. nested lUns1 anni
qunratnions for phrases: "united states" finance nor (history or inwu)
I Iluhumblimm


| Apr.)4 In ElI~


Start 0.er | Basic Search


Isnp FwHUlbad Entry m.
PrI .Jul I I1 c ll*** Mi ~l ~l tlg ) kl I b;~ 11'ljP.. Iij l


Map Facimtated Entry ,
p..III.ILIX 1(1.01 EGo alllll6--J E~ltnip..pll9N1ry. I


Option 3 Search lists of litis, call raurnbers, tc.
Tills thalk will take youl to Ole prevlous catalog,


Figure 4-5. Sample screen accommodating link to expand search to geographic coordinates.


L aLllllinle L9I 100.1.10

C Allhirs


I


Lal.111.e .0 1 i. e






Libraries


r son & ).gs.


ilil4 1


I sP


Figure 4-6. Sample screens accommodating geographic coordinate searches for points and for
bounding box (Qinchai Province, China).


011on4 $g~ a~th~p~ C eed InO tillS g C (0ftliles
Tns inktale8slru to geograpit cooninele search edgle


|UF "-May 4. Kn..ell.e-r"
Libraries









CHAPTER 4

CURRENT PRACTICE IN PROVIDING GEOGRAPHIC COORDINATE INFORMATION

Describing Coordinate Representations

Coordinates that are provided in library bibliographic records allow users to Eind specific

points or areas on the earth's surface, as represented on the map. The labeling and recording of

these points are governed by rules that library catalogers follow to best describe the cartographic

item in hand. The paragraphs that follow will encompass the work behind providing geographic

coordinate information to comply with library and metadata standards and simultaneously be

easy to interpret and useful for the researcher.

A center point or two-point set system of coordinate values identifies a specific point on

the earth's surface, often used to show a point of elevation or the location of a city on a map.

Map catalogers historically have been providing bounding (box) coordinates, or a set of four

points that surround some geographic region, as shown on a map (Andrew, 2003, pp. 94-95). A

number of sheet maps identify the four coordinate points representing the interior area that has

been mapped. The variety of interpretations of map cataloging rules leads catalogers to providing

coordinates whether or not they appear on a map. This is further complicated by asking for

interpolation, or rather the estimate of a coordinate value from other known information from the

map, which may result in faulty measurements and human error. Bounding boxes (Figure 4-1)

are the smallest boxes possible that show longitude and latitude lines with sides that enclose the

extent of the coordinates of the map or the area of coverage. They are also known as nainintun

bounding rectangles (Hill, 2006).

The rule for providing coordinates is considered optional to apply, but when a cataloger

uses this rule practice dictates that the coordinates are provided as a set forming a bounding box

or rectangle. The push for providing coordinate information contributes to the ability of new











A B C D E F G H I J K


Figure" 4-.xmls fmp acigcneninlcodiaeifrmto.Fomuprlf
clc kwise d aunidniid alhnmrccodnt sse AtAak)
fatay/mainryma Cotien o Athm, ouis mp Daa, nda) ad era
phtgrp ofKyWsF a.Sucs(rmuprlfcocnie:AtHmpae
Hide a~rpdcm eot rpisnentoaan opr noaeLd







aiur sensexap of copltee s w acith thvninl oriae information. ofee rom thee maeia nhad noigtheei




otheegrd information mising Wise hoing whtlich, tenumertatifon sanardi crtoc provide rcnveti









CHAPTER 5
CATALOGING ISSUES IN PROVIDING GEOGRAPHIC COORDINATES

Addressing Boundary and Accuracy Issues

This work concentrates on the problem of providing cartographic information, and, more

specifically, coordinate system information, for the cartographic material being described. The

map cataloger is used to providing all kinds of spatial information to describe maps: scale,

projection, source, and place names. Other non-spatial information is also included: title, author,

subj ect (non-geographic) terms, type, edition, and situation date. All these descriptions provide

many of the elements necessary for the needs of spatial resource users, and they do so in a

variety of approaches and interpretations under a uniform standard.

Additionally, boundaries are lines determining the limits of an area and can have many

meanings, usually depending on what function they serve along with the perceptions of those

who live in their proximity. Boundaries are authenticated or legalized by being depicted in

documents or on lines drawn on maps or on land or sea through the placement of markers or

checkpoints. Disputes regarding boundaries come about from broken treaties. From differing

map representations likely from overlapping territorial claims, and from heavily concentrated

militarized areas along disputed borders. The resulting spatial changes from boundary conflicts

are linked to broader processes affecting divided countries and from people not necessarily

wanting to be divided (Wood, 2000). This, in turn, affects search retrieval border, geographic

line identification, and labeling in maps, while both cataloging specialists and researchers try to

avoid taking a political stance or attempt to remain neutral in definition (Figure 5-1).

Boundaries also tend to symbolize the chaotic, frustrating and sometime warring tension

among groups with hopes for self-determination and internationally recognized sovereignty. The

value of a legally recognized boundary can be beneficial for the people affected by its parameters









a. Documentation of the data by way of cataloging
(documenting bibliographic information of library materials helps preserve data, that is,
that data' s legacy and longevity for future use)
b. Viable transfer of data and the data' s documentation through metadata
(metadata is used for improving document retrieval, as well as supporting and transferring
data information from one collection to another)
c. Agreed-upon symbols and numbers for presentation
(using the same kind of symbols and punctuation reduces interpretation of existing symbols
and eliminates duplication of symbols to mean other definitions)
d. What elements of content will be presented?
(agreed-to elements help save time by working with already established terms and help
with communicating in said terminology)
e. Which format(s) it will be distributed in
(materials in the library may include many types of materials; primary sources may also
later be reproduced in another format whether book, photograph, map, atlas, compact
disc, or microform)
f. Intent behind the creator's map
(visual approach: map for instruction or for highlighting statistical information or for re-
creating an event--all may help identify subj ect identification)
g. Consideration for international bodies and open sources
(material copyright or licensing issues versus equal access to all)
h. The dominating approach behind laissez-faire industries driving the preferred or
monopolized use of metadata standards
(legal issues tied to duplication of material or effort to reproduce material in different
formats)

Standards are for facilitating the development, sharing, and use of, in this case, spatial

data. Agencies, such as the U.S. Federal Geographic Data Committee (FGDC), develop

standards for implementation, and sharing and use of spatial data on a national level. The FGDC

does this in consultation and cooperation with state, local, and tribal governments, the private

sector and academic community, and, to the extent feasible, the international community.

Standards and uniformity contribute to common or "agreed-upon" ways of cataloging and

supplying spatial information to bibliographic records and metadata. As such, data built to

standards are more valuable since they are more easily shared, again, through the use of

metadata.












TABLE OF CONTENTS


page

ACKNOWLEDGMENT S .............. ...............4.....


LI ST OF FIGURE S .............. ...............7.....


LIST OF ACRONYMS .............. ...............8.....


AB S TRAC T ......_ ................. ............_........9


CHAPTER


1 INTRODUCTION ................. ...............11.......... ......


2 LITERATURE REVIEW ................. ...............14................


3 METHODS OF ANALYSIS .............. ...............24....


Approaches Promoting Library Use .............. ...............24....
Outreach ................ ... ......... ...............29......
Exigency in Information Science............... ...............31

4 CURRENT PRACTICE INT PROVIDING GEOGRAPHIC COORDINATE
INFORMATION .............. ...............35....


Describing Coordinate Representations .............. ...............35....
Comparing Coordinate Representations ................. ...............41........... ....
Retrieval of Material s ................. ...............42...

Map Services and Mapping Tools .............. ...............44....
Database Discussion ................. .. ......_ ...............47....
Geographi cal S searching in Library C atalogs ................. ...............48........... .

5 CATALOGING IS SUE S INT PROVIDING GEOGRAPHIC COORDINATE S................... .5 1


Addressing Boundary and Accuracy Issues .............. ...............51....
Metadata Language Use .............. ...............57....

6 SUMMARY AND CONCLUSION ................. ...............60.......... ....


APPENDIX


A SURVEY WORK AND ANALYSIS ................. ...............67........... ...


B SURVEY RE SULT S .............. ...............69....


C SAMPLE SURVEY SHEET .............. ...............72....









others. From what has been experienced at libraries, it appears that it may be a long time before

the most appropriate solutions can be found. Maps are often among the largest and least

controlled in a library's collection (Smith & Sproles, 2004, p. 23).

Cataloging has been important in describing traditional library materials. However,

traditional library cataloging elements lack certain descriptive information that meets the needs

of a new generation of savvy Internet users who are locating spatial resources and demanding

search alternatives. Traditional library cataloging is struggling to adapt to the needs of locating

resources and establishing standards. However, traditional library cataloging has provided a level

of refinement for information retrieval that is highly successful for manual retrieval of

bibliographic items.

Map libraries have traditionally relied on place names for geographical searches.

Geographic coordinates using latitude and longitude can complement spatially related searches.

Using these coordinates will allow for established relationships in relation to information near or

between those identified points or lines. Library catalog records are constantly indexed with

geographic data that are provided for future use (Buckland, 2007, p. 376).

Providing geographic coordinates to library bibliographic records can be the requirement

to improve retrieval of digital spatial data cataloging. This geographic information approach

attempts to use the tools of spatial databases and data analysis as a basis for cataloging spatial

metadata. This approach is needed because a more complex set of requirements than traditional

catalog-based systems would be invaluable to many experienced spatial data users. The trend in

this approach is the development of browsers that allow searchers to graphically browse datasets

from one or more databases.










and geology, all of these among others are concerned with a particular location on the planet,

maybe even the universe--including astronomy. In traditional library catalogs, materials are

mainly accessed by subj ect matter or call number, but not always by geographical data (Smits,

2000). Cartographic materials must use the unique mathematical properties they provide in a

time where this information is readily available and becoming more prominent, and they must

consequently integrate or develop geographic information browsers that can perform the

functions to carry out coordinate searches.

This work has demonstrated a need to address the changes occurring at the University of

Florida Libraries in regard to information technology, especially the way cataloging methods

affect metadata production. University librarians and geographers must embrace the changes in

information sciences and work together to improve the way spatially referenced information can

help with the dissemination of information and improve access to research materials that will be

available not only to researchers but of everyone else. The apparent instantaneous changes,

which occur with the availability of immediate documentation results on the Internet, must not

discourage information keepers (librarians) or information seekers from working together to

create better methods for storing and retrieving information. Librarians, who have the rules and

the standards in place, and geographers, who have the tools (GIS) at their disposal, must make

themselves available and make others aware that they have the potential to create a system that

will clarify the muckiness of unrelated results from endlessly wading through full-text searches

on the Internet.









is needed that determines these coordinates, and GIS and image processing software may have

the needed answers.

Because library science has developed under the strictest standards and research rules,

and has been able to integrate, albeit at a slower pace than demanded by the public, the spatial

analysis needed for geographical searches of library materials. The open systems architecture,

application programming, the capability to support integration with other software, and computer

languages and geographic coordinates that GIS supplies have all enabled specific and demanding

application development to go with the greater demand placed on librarians to provide

information.

An essential component of indexing cartographic digitized materials is the processing

functions. What needs to be addressed is how geography as a Hield will play a role in not only

providing geographic data but how GIS technologies fit the model of digital libraries, According

to Jue (1996),

Part of the problem with the introduction of GIS into a public library setting is
that there has been little research on ways to make accessing and use of digital
spatial data easier for the casual data users, a category in which most public
library users fall (p.210).

Specifically, since location is a dynamic and effective way to organize information,

geographic coordinates can be used to interface all cartographic information and digitization

processing in regard to spatial data. Coordinates can help search for geographic information by

way of a graphic interface and text searching of physical locations, and may provide for hard

copy output results from its queried data.

The development of cartographic cataloging schemes needs could benefit from a base in

geography. A spatial component is necessary to classify cartographic materials. Adequate

research is also needed to determine if some methods of locating spatial resources are better than










APPENDIX C
SAMPLE SURVEY SHEET



UF Library catalog GEOGRAPHIC searches survey:


To: ALL Library patrons, specifically researchers using geographical references
From: Jorge A. Gonzalez, Senior Archivist, Smathers Libraries, University of Florida


This survey is to help find problem areas in searching cartographic library materials for academic research. UF library patrons are involved in
study or research that requires use of the library catalog and access to materials of a geographic nature. Your answer to the following survey
questions will help identify problems that come up while searching the library catalog. Please be aware you do not have to answer any question
you wish not to answer. This survey will take about 2-3 minutes to answer. No payment is offered but your participation is appreciated. There
are no risks to you for participating in this study. Your identity will remain anonymous. There are no immediate benefits to the participant, but it
is hoped that this survey will help future library users make better searches of a geographic nature or subject. No one under the age of 18 may
participate in this program.
*** For questions about your rights as a research participant, contact the IRB office at 392-0433 or irb2frufl.edu ***


*** Please circle all choices in bold that apply ***


1. Are you?


Undergrad


Graduate Faculty


Staff


Visitor


Other


2. While searching the library catalog do you look for (and find or use) any of the following
information or formats of publication?


--Census data
materials


--Demographic information


--Digitized data


--GIS


--Statistical documents
etc.)


--Aerial photos --Satellite images


--Other (Atlas, CD's,


3. Do you find an adequate amount of materials of a geographical nature in the library
database?


Yes


Unsure


4. VWhich of the following is your preferred location for searching said materials?


-Mlain branch

-From Home


-Other branch

-From Internet


-Mlap Library

-Elsewhere:


5. How do you think library listing (cataloging, or description) of geographic materials can be
improved to assure you have done a thorough search of the library catalog to satisfy your needs
or requirements or, what can be done to help you get the most out of your search? Providing:

-Mlore geographic headings -Mlore geographic notes -Mlore coordinates (lat/Iong) info.










(BGN), a likely and optimal authoritative source for these data, provides center point

coordinates, as contrasted with bounding box coordinates typically found in sheet maps, again

contributing to the debate of "best fit" numbers in the information allowed by the cataloging

rules. It is also important to discuss a temporal problem regarding coordinates. Should date

information be provided due to the likelihood of changes brought to boundaries because of

political or natural events? Also, as with most researched work, will the sources of information

for these dates be provided with links to trace the origin of the information?

While these issues may be resolved later by the bodies which govern the choices of

content of library bibliographic and authority records, some issues need to be determined sooner

rather than later to keep up with users' needs and their ever-expanding access to information and

technology. Enhancing the power of authority records, those separate records maintained and

linked to various kinds of descriptive records, is a worthwhile endeavor. The enhancement is to

better partner with the problem-solvers who use GIS to address our problems (Lundgren, 2005).

According to the 1994 report titled Promoting the National Spatial Data In~frastructure

through PartnershiPP~~PP~~PPpsPPPP from the Mapping Science Committee of the National Research Council:

The twenty-first century will see geographic information transported from remote
nodes using computer networks to support decision making throughout the nation.
... Timely use of these data would be difficult due to ill-defined format, quality,
and accuracy. National or regional decision making would be severely impaired
because most data sets are not adequately characterized (NRC website).

Retrieval of Materials

The idea behind providing coordinates is to develop a user-friendly way of retrieving

maps from a digital database. Additionally, some systems will allow users to specify census

tracts, city, county, state regions, area codes, or zip codes as a spatial constraint--all ways of

describing something spatially. The retrieval may be done by specifying a geographic name or

by selecting a graphic map representation. Furthermore, areas defined by geographic coordinates












Example in decimal degrees for Fairbanks, Alaska:

hddd.dddddd (hemisphere, decimal number)
034 1_ a ||d E148.7781 14 ||e E146.409811 ||f NO65409163 ||g N64.6000099

The 034 MARC field is directly based on parts of information from another MARC field,

255 (Cartographic Mathematical Data). Present cataloging practice makes it optional to include

bounding coordinates that appear on a map, but when they are included in the bibliographic

record, they must be included in both 255 and 034 fields. The 255 field contains the coordinates

in degree, minute, and second (dms) symbols, with appropriate hemisphere denoted, and the field

must contain a scale statement as either a representative fraction when known or through the

means of a standard phrase such as Scale not given (www.oclc.org).

Examples of coordinates in 255 field:

dms (degrees, minutes, seconds)
255 ||a Scale 1:250,000 ||c (E 72 :71 's I' --E 34031 1'1 2 N 35030'11"--N 35000'00").
Bounding box for Cyprus, or

255 ||a Scale not given ||c (W 1250--W 650/N 490--N 250)
Bounding box for United States.


Both fields are repeatable, meaning they can provide coordinate information for multiple

maps appearing on the same sheet or additional sheets that make up the entire region. The

coordinate information is provided as long as the information is present or can be estimated.

Greenwich is assumed when no prime meridian is identified on the map. If a different meridian

is specified on an antique map (Figure 4-2), the cataloger records the coordinates in Greenwich,

but may choose to give other meridians provided in the notes area of a record (Mangan, 2005).









information retrieval and access. Geographical information science has traditionally been within

the realm of geography departments, but in a number of places GIS programs and degrees are

offered in a multidisciplinary and interdisciplinary environment outside the traditional

departmental boundaries; the question remains whether a restructured GIS approach in

geography will claim this terrain or if this constitutes a threat to its traditional role. These issues

will require considerable debate; they seem far from resolved at this point. In addition to the

matter of who will provide the education, much work remains to be done to integrate even basic

notions of spatial analysis into mainstream social science curricula.

An underlying theme of this work is that "space does matter," although this may not be

immediately evident in the social sciences. An important challenge to the spatial analysis

community consists of demonstrating in clear terms that much is to be gained from the discipline

of geography by a careful and explicit approach that incorporates spatial elements in social

science research.

Many developments in new technology and information sciences form the foundation for

a growing importance of spatial analysis. This is an exciting frontier and it probably brings

significant gains in the technical skills, theoretical skills, and knowledge associated with

geographic information science. In order to accomplish some significant advance, data analysis

and computation will continue to be necessary. In addition, these advances are likely to continue

in interdisciplinary environment where traditional boundaries are brought down. It is a challenge

to the geography and information science communities to seize this opportunity and provide the

means to develop spatially integrated programs.

Information retrieval based on geographic information is just beginning to take a foothold

in information research; therefore little research has been done to evaluate the effectiveness of




























SourcJh LL OdMas
The ;r;c rdinate~~7~ grid information sas roie naunfr a.Prvdnh





way. Te follntqe apsowing litsth rder in whichcoordin ate nd Man maph areiven iinted rcoord:
a) wstermostd ("etosdt") plongitue (ofthe mCap AA vrwa i rsn-
b) easernmos ("righmos" 2 long situde of d the map ie ~issip cra171 -1



This cordiaer isolowd infomattrwareion is blopoie inga describe wanywhereovn theplnt

Asimortiante rasl thel oder stemat hemaia proexpriessioof cthen coordinate agis aelpso iprtant

snethe numbe fericlrepres entationwill omlecoe to pedadudrecsion than if exressed linguistially.

wa.The bound wing box t rers hrentaion works betorprvdingte informat ion n library recordsadi


is easyto nernmstan despigtesthe lneetde to folo ah uiom odrWeondno



coimordinate ar te note aviable ordifiut mtoa determined or cetheron coordinates hsaveo beetnt










provided or found in an authoritative source, then the center point coordinates can be provided

by repeating the latitude and longitude numbers in the above order. Since maps do not always fit

a rectangular bounding box shape and can be any sort of polygon shape, they may be identified

with a center point coordinate. The centroid, or the point at the geometric center of the polygon,

can be used to represent the area.

Since every flat map already misrepresents the surface of the earth, one sheet of a map

data-set represented digitally, as opposed to the bounding box in one map sheet, cannot show the

true distances, areas, and shapes it represents. Additional coordinate information is provided in

two more MARC Hields: 342 and 343. The MARC Hield 342 is specifically created to address the

frame of reference for the coordinates in a data-set, and not a single map. This field includes

enough information so that the user can identify how location accuracy was affected through the

application of a spatial reference method, and then can manipulate the data-set to recover

location accuracy. This field also contains the grid coordinate system indicating (ALCTS, 2006).

Additionally, the plane-rectangular coordinate system is what is used, which is based on

and mathematically adjusted to a map proj section, so that geographic positions can be readily

transformed to and from plane coordinates. Additionally, information about the coordinate

system developed on a planar surface is included in field 343. This field can include enough

information to allow the user of a geospatial data-set to identify the quantities of distances, or

distances and angles. These distances help define the position of a point on a reference plane

onto which the surface of the earth has been proj ected (ALCTS, 2006).

Although strict guidelines need to be followed regarding placement of coordinates, many

maps do not always include the information that is required to provide accurate geographic

coordinates on the metadata (Figure 4-3).










Buckland, Michael and Lancaster, L. 2004. "Combining place, time, and topic: the
Electronic Cultural Atlas Initiative." D-Lib Magazine. 10, no. 5, from
http ://www. dlib .org/dlib/may0 4/buckl and/05Sbuckl and. html

Buckland, Michael, et al. 2007. "Geographic Search: Catalogs, Gazetteers, and Maps," in
College & Research Libraries 68, no. 5:3 76-3 87.

Cai, Guoray. 2001. GeoVIBE: A Visual Interface to Geographic Digital Library from
2001 ACM-IEEE JCDI, Workshop on Visual Interfaces.

Caldwell, Douglas R. 2005. "Unlocking the mysteries of the bounding box,"
Coordinates: Online Journal of the Map and Geography Round Table, American
Library Association (by MAGERT). Series A. no. 2, Retrieved Fall 2006 from
http://www. suny sb .edu/libmap/coordinate s/seri esa/no2/a2.htm.

Compare Infobase Limited. 2007. "Tourist map of Daman" from
http:.//www.mapsofworld. com/

De Floriani, L.; Marzano, P.; & Puppo, E. 1993. "Spatial queries and data models," in A.
Spatial information theory: A theoretical basis for GIS. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.

Dillon, Martin & Jul, Erik. 1996. "Cataloging Internet Resources: the convergence of
libraries," in Cataloging & Classification Quarterly. 22, no. 3/4:197-238.

Ercegovac, Zorona, and Harold Borko. 1992. "Performance Evaluation of Mapper," in
Information Processing & Management. 28.2: 259-268.

Federal Geographic Data Committee. 1994. "Content standards for digital spatial
metadata (Overview)," Federal Geographic Data Committee. Washington, D.C.
http:.//geol ogy.usgs. gov/tool s/metadata/standard/overvi ew. html

Frank, Steven M. 1994. Catalogingparadigms for spatial metttttadta.tttt~~~~~tttt (Ph. D. Thesis:
University of Maine).

Gonzalez, Jorge, "Problems that arise when providing geographic coordinate information
for cataloged maps," Coordinates: Online Journal of the Map and Geography
Round Table, American Library Association, ser. B: 8,
http://purl.oclc. org/coordinates/b 8.pdf (accessed October 16, 2007)

Goodchild, M.F. & Janelle, D.G. 2004. "Thinking spatially in the social sciences" in
Spatially Integrated Social Science. New York: Oxford University Press.

Goodchild, Michael. 1998. "The geolibrary" in Steve Carter (ed.), Innovations in GIS,
Chapter 5. London: Taylor and Francis.









Eind the materials they need. Databases outside the library can be incorporated to complement

the library's own databases.

An attempt needs to be made to Eind a balance between what the users comprehend and

the nuances that metadata quality control requires. Another way to look at quality control is to

rate the database by how well it can answer questions and not just how well it can retrieve a list

of sources. The secret to database improvement appears to be organization. But how can the

database be better organized without the input of the users?

As larger quantities of materials are entered into library databases, users are often

overwhelmed with information. Increasing the total number of items makes it more difficult to

Eind materials. As hypertext increases, the resolution of searching by way of storing many items

increases the complexity of searching. Traditional libraries solve these problems by grouping

them together. Electronically, a similar way is needed to organize this increasing amount of

information. Highlighting frequent words and phrases and grouping related subj ect topics can be

effective in helping retrieve what the user needs. Counterbalancing the displaying of too many

entries using hypertext, the user is left with displaying titles by hierarchical category. The

general idea is to apply techniques that solve attempts at detailed queries and get right results the

first time (Lesk, 1989, Intro.).

One problem that must be overcome is the perception that online catalogs continue to be

difficult to use because their design does not take into account users' searching behavior. A false

belief exists that a "search" is independent of further searches assuming that there is no need to

formulate different options to explore a topic. Ideally, the approach is that online catalogs will

be judged by how well they answer questions and the ease of transferring information to other

systems, and not by how well they match queries. For many years it has been argued which









Furthermore, digitized spatial data see no end in sight because an unwritten directive to is

to digitize every bit of information available, coupled with coming up with more and more layers

of information to integrate to the existing digitized information. Once a spatial data obj ect has

been created or needs to be classified, it will also need to be constantly updated and edited,

depending on the editing of the material or catering to the patrons' needs or requests. Catalogers-

-whether digital or map librarians, or better yet, maybe geographers--will become the GIS

managers occupied with developing, creating, editing, and validating inputs and standards for

spatial data. One uncertainty is how great the growth of databases will relate to the digital spatial

obj ects. Another uncertainty is how far librarians, geographers, and researchers can go

discovering new data and text mining processes.

Today, information technology provides a possible new application for modem

geography. Henry Tom (1994), the GIS director for Oracle Corporation working on metadata

standards, stated that these GIS standards offer an unprecedented means for the GIS world to

interact on an equal and mutually beneficial basis with the world of information technology

standards. The University of Florida Libraries can benefit from more geography and GIS

professionals. But it is important that geography will create an agenda that includes the

appropriate curricula to establish what will serve as a base for uniform spatial information and

library information standards for manipulating, classifying, and retrieving spatial information.

Such an infrastructure serves not only as a standards forum, but it also establishes a community

of concern and ownership in developing specifications to resolve spatial issues common to all.

For a successful collaboration, library digitization and cataloging issues must also be resolved.

Challenges include recognizing how spatial data from digitized materials can be

formulated into the integration of spatial analysis in both the curricula of social scientists and









ANALYSIS OF SPATIAL INFORMATION TO IMPROVE RETRIEVAL OF
CARTOGRAPHIC MATERIALS BY PROVIDING GEOGRAPHIC COORDINATE
INFORMATION





















By

JORGE A. GONZALEZ


A THESIS PRESENTED TO THE GRADUATE SCHOOL
OF THE UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT
OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF
MASTER OF ARTS

UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA

2007









and history. In an effort to enhance map retrieval with better tools and standard practices by way

of digitization, software must be developed and manipulated to allow downloading and editing of

geo-temporal data to manipulate the representation as well as editing the data if needed. This

interface will be improved by the availability of shared data accessible through map-based

interfaces, standards for gazetteers and time period databases, continuous research, studies to

develop and improve geographic aspects in online catalogs, and good practice guidelines for

preparing paper and electronic publications (Buckland, 2004).

In order to display information in geographic tool software, map data must be

georeferenced. To create base maps and contribute additional map layers, the map data must

routinely include data with latitude and longitude attributes, along with the use of place names

collected in the course of research on historical texts or actual material in hand. The Alexandria

Digital Library (ADL) is one powerful player on the authoritative level of selecting place names

for this kind of work (Hill and Zheng, 1999). Regarding thematic concerns, even the flexibility

of converting coordinate information and despite the ideal of uniform data, the information will

be dependent on the researcher carrying out the queries and having an understanding of the

database that provides the necessary information.

Geographical Searching in Library Catalogs

Library catalogs have been designed, or are best known, for searching by author, by title,

and by subject, but they are in the process of developing their spatial searching capabilities

through the application of GIS and providing additional numerical data. The user can search for

place names in titles, keywords, or in subj ect headings, but geographical headings tend to be

political jurisdictions or of an administrative nature. These names tend to depend on current use

and can be burdensome for historical or political changes.










information. The maps can be clicked and dragged that allows viewing of adj acent sections.

Google Maps also provides a layer of satellite images to view desired locations in that format. As

in other address-oriented online maps, it provides detailed driving directions; along with the

standard shortcuts and arrow key use for panning the map in different directions and includes

zooming and scroll abilities. Another Google service, Google Earth, displays 3-D images and

supply coordinates, but it has not made the coordinates a searchable indexed element to date

(Gurnitsky, 2006). The shortcomings are very apparent when its limits are realized by way of the

number of maps it can produce. Google Earth is neither a warehouse nor a collection of different

types of maps as libraries are, and it does not provide a thesaurus or cross-referencing of variant

names.

The Alexandria Digital Library (ADL) includes datasets of U. S. topographic map

quadrangles, and parts of the GNIS data from the U.S. Geological Survey have been added. The

database allows the user to search for place names, which includes both primary names and

variant names for the geographic location. To help with the establishment of one standard place

name from many alternative spellings, ADL provides a general way to specify the type of feature

in the query. Narrower terms of a selected feature type are included, allowing browsing to find

related words; for example, to look for farms in an area, the user can find out that they are given

the general type of agriculturalfeatures (ADLP, 2004).

The Alexandria Digital Library Proj ect (ADLP) has the advantage of developing a

georeferenced digital library that holds both textual and geospatial resources that provide

geospatial description and access for all resources. Coordinates are used to represent the location

of features on the surface of the earth. The coverage of maps, aerial photographs, remote-sensing

images, and datasets of various kinds and coordinate place referencing have been associated with










-Acquiring more print maps -Increasing access to staff -Improving geographic
literacy

-Other:


6. Do you rely on latitudellongitude to help you retrieve cartographic materials?
Yes No


7. Would you prefer searching latitude/Iongitude or geographic placenames to find maps? Or
both.


8. VWhat other problems do you generally or specifically encounter when searching the library
database for geographic/cartographic materials?










include precision which can be described as the degree of detail that can be displayed in time,

space, or topic as subj ect entries, and includes maintaining a consistency which is the absence of

contradictory information in said database. Among the quality issues mentioned regarding

cataloging cartographic materials, the following issues have to be confronted:

a. Spatial precision when providing the actual coordinates
b. Accurate measurement of materials
c. Not providing coordinates (or working with missing data)
d. Consulting current source data for carrying out updated revisions

While simultaneously providing local interpretations to procedural rules, which, in turn

are susceptible to such errors in human definitions as:

a. Uncertainty of measurements
b. Not following up on discrepancies
c. Prioritizing or deciding what information to leave in or out
d. Converting data to internationally accepted standards or other local standards

Accurate information is vital for effective results in the information-providing world. The

information will be relied on by individuals, researchers, and even government agencies.

Accuracy is an essential component in the decision-making process in producing the most

accountable information. Bad decisions contribute to the absence of reliable, accurate

information, and increase the chances of producing a product that will impair or flaw the

scientific process. Data are susceptible to human inaccuracy and conditional to what gets

measured and what gets ignored.

Advances in technology, as in the digitization of materials, are increasing the range of

what can be measured. Since library science has been involved in the business of providing

information, librarians--specifically catalogers--find themselves increasingly involved in

providing more information. The human factor in the increase of providing information makes









created and shared geographic information systems and use spatial data that allow for the

retrieval processes to increase usage, access, and metadata integration.

This work explores the importance of understanding and applying map cataloging rules to

provide the most accurate information possible in the local database. It offers additional methods

to help find maps and other cartographic information quickly and accurately from an online

retrieval database. A strong need has occurred to standardize spatial data to improve search

query responses by providing uniform information and by addressing thematic errors. The work

will present the idea of using the digital library to help introduce the concept of spatial reference

to enhance retrieval capabilities, teaching, and learning.











LIST OF REFERENCES ................. ...............74................

BIOGRAPHICAL SKETCH .............. ...............8 1....


































































6









users susceptible to more inaccurate information. So standards must be constantly reviewed to

decrease errors or at least keep to a minimum the number of errors.

Metadata Language Use

Libraries rely on the MARC (MAchine Readable Cataloging) format, which has been

criticized for some shortcomings relevant to digital spatial data. In reality, no other metadata

scheme is so carefully reviewed, revised, amended, and so universally in place as is the MARC

format for library materials. Ercegovac and Borko argue that use of the MARC format "requires

cataloger' s memorization of a large number of rules, which change frequently" (1992, p. 267 as

quoted in Franks 1994, p. 13) Additionally, MARC contains many variants and interpretations

among different interest groups and committees that have led to a few problems in exchanging

bibliographic data (Frank, 1994, p. 23). While the MARC record format contains fields that

identify spatial data, including map scale, proj section, or map bounding coordinates, the use of

such fields is inconsistent. Some of the information that can be provided is optional for the

cataloger to provide.

Additionally, the Federal Geographic Data Committee (FGDC) initiated work in 1992 via

a forum on geographical metadata standards. Its obj ectives are to provide a common set of

terminology and definitions for the documentation of digital geospatial data. The standard

establishes the names of data elements and groups of data elements. By Executive Order 12906,

Coordinating Geographic Data Acquisition and Access: The National Spatial Data

Infr~astructure was signed in 1994 by President Clinton. The FGDC invites and encourages

organizations, government agencies, and persons to use the standard when documenting

geospatial data (FGDC, 1994).

Few spatial data representations are more basic than the bounding box: a rectangle

surrounding a geographic feature or dataset. Bounding boxes are key components of geospatial









CHAPTER 2
LITERATURE REVIEW

Geographic Information Systems (GIS) may represent a new way of looking at

information (to librarians, not necessarily geographers). Such systems integrate computer

hardware, software, data, and the human mind to bring new perspectives to problem-solving. To

solve spatial-related problems, it is necessary to have georeferenced information or data that can

be layered with more data. As an emerging technology for libraries, GIS raises a host of issues:

cost, a steep learning curve, and a lot of computer space. At the same time, it is an attractive

technology that most proponents claim has revolutionized the way people look at the world and

the way to solve the issues of switching from print to digitization technology.

Writings about geolibraries and access to information, archiving, and collection

development, have tended to over simplify-library issues or focus too much on the computational

aspects of libraries. It is assumed that GIS users regard metadata standards and processes related

to information description as new or unique, or even highly technical (Boxall, 2002).

In regard to neolibraries: geography and spatial information are the catalyst for this new

virtual information repository. But maybe this is the new archetype for the "old" Hields of

geography and library science? Geography and library science are natural partners in this new

development. Technology, chiefly digitized information on the Internet, is the primary operator

in the need for libraries to adapt to this new-found home for GIS and spatial information. The

geolibrary, as defined by Michael Goodchild (1998, quoted in Boxall, 2003, p. 20), is one "Hilled

with georeferenced information" and based upon the notion that information may have a

geographic "footprint." While geographers worked with geographic information, the idea now is

being able to work or contribute to georeferenced information, such as photographs, videos,

music, and literature--all providing a locational variable and needing a locational search.










Roes, Hans. 2001. "Digital Libraries and Education: Trends and Opportunities," D-Lib
Magazine, v.28, no. 6, 2001. Retrieved Fall 2006, from
http://www.dlib.org/dlib/july0 1/roes/07roes.html.

Rusbridge, Chris. 1998. "Towards the Hybrid Library." D-Lib Magazine. July issue.

Sears, Brian. April 10, 2004. "Geocoding challenges: why accuracy matters," in
Directions Magazine http://www.directi onsmag. com/.

Shabaee, Pual. 2002. "Primary multimedia objects and 'Educational Metadata': A
fundamental dilemma for developers of multimedia archives," in D-Lib
Magazine, v.8, no. 6, 2002. Retrieved Summer 2007, from
http://www.dlib.org/dlib/june02/shabaj ee/06shabaj ee.html.

Shank, John D. 2006. "Establishing our presence in courseware: Adding library services
to the virtual classroom," in hIformation Technology and Libraries, v.22. no. 1.
Retrieved June 2007 from
http://news. ala. org/al a/lita/litapubli cati ons/ital/220 1shank. cfm.
Stevenson, Bill. 2000. "Servicing map users at Aalborg University Library," in Liber
Quarterly 10:454-464.

Smith,A., & Sproles, C. 2004. "Don't Get Lost!:The Basics of Organizing a Library's
Map Collecton," in Kentuckry Libraries, 68, no.2:22-27.

Smits, Jan. 2000. Can a map be a geographic information retrieval tool?" in LIBER
Quarterly, the Journal ofEuropean Research Libraries 10, no 4. from http://liber-
maps.kb.nl/articles/12smits.html.

Smits, Jan 1999. "[Digital Cartographic Materials] Metadata: an Introduction," in
Cataloging and' Classification Quarterly. 27, no. 2:303-3 19.

Smits, Jan. 2002. "Geospatial Data Access: Can We Manage To Shift?," in INSPEL. 36.
no. 1:22-48.

Tom, Henry. 1994. "The Geographic Information Systems (GIS) Standards
Infrastructures," in Standard~~dd~dd iew.d~~~dd~ 2, no.3:133-142.

United State Geological Survey, Board of Geographic Names. 2007. BGN Website,
retrieved Summer 2007 from http://geonames.usgs.gov/ .

Welch, Grace D. and Williams, Frank. 1999. "Cataloguing Digital Cartographic," in
Materials Cataloging and' Classification Quarterly. 27, no. 2:343-362.

Wieczorek, John, Guo, Qinghua & Hijmanns, Robert J. 2004. "The point-radius method
for georeferencing locality descriptions and calculating associated uncertainty," in
hIternational Journal of GeographicallInformation Science. 18, no. 8:745-767.









searching by coordinates. For now, place name queries are sensitive to language and grammar

issues, and a name is not available for every place on the planet. The idea for the use of

coordinates is that every place can be identified by geographic coordinates (Hill, 2006).

Robin Kearns (2001, p. 306), from the University of Auckland, New Zealand, summed

up what is being communicated in this work:

At the start of a new century of geographic endeavour, it behoves us to take
seriously what the public thinks of our world, and thinks of us as interpreters of it
for much of our teaching and research is shaped by trends in society at large and
the spirit of our age. While shaped, we should also be shapers and contest the
processes that might otherwise be constructed as inevitable. Ironically perhaps,
geography become history to the extent that we restore the story of geography
and broader perspectives on people and place to our curriculum .... We need to
endorse the primacy of place experience and recognize the university and
community as mutually interdependent sites of geographical education. While we
might doubt our abilities to change the world at large, if we critically influence
the worlds of others, they, in turn and in time, may positively change ours.

The future of the University of Florida Libraries will depend on library science and

geography. Both geographic needs and library information's needs for providing academic

research will only grow and become an increasing part of our information consciousness. It is

necessary to become more familiar and skilled with the technology and be more spatial-literate.

Establishing standards continues to be important, especially standards for metadata. The ability

to use the Internet and GIS continues to grow not just for the ability to access static information,

but also the ability to interact with and manipulate the data online. And librarians must work

with geographers to take on more managerial roles in the design and provision of GIS services,

leaving the technical aspects, ideally, to specially trained geographers.

This work by no means needs to be the end but rather the beginning of a larger proj ect.

Spatial information can be found in many other sources besides cartographic materials. When

looking at documents concerning agriculture, census information, biology, ecology, archeology,









online catalogs are difficult to use because their design does not incorporate sufficient

understanding of searching behavior. In the short term, librarians can help make online catalogs

easier to use through improved training and documentation that is based on information-seeking

behavior, but good training is not a substitute for a good system design. A more permanent goal

will be to design intuitive systems that require a minimum of instruction. Given the complexity

of the information retrieval problem and the limited capabilities of today's systems, librarians are

not close to achieving that goal (Borgman, 1996).

Ideally, an attempt must be made to Eind a balance that serves a diverse range of library

users while making the indexing and management of the database retrievable. The library shall

be able to serve outside campus researchers, extension workers, and correspondence studies

students. Library professionals need to ask researchers to help in the development of an informed

decision-making process that strikes a balance between comprehensibility and metadata

standards. Metadata standards are information content for the purpose of providing a common set

of terminology and definitions for concepts related to the Hield of study. Metadata is also data

about the content, quality, condition, and other data characteristics. Researchers cannot be

overlooked when focusing on the development of a system that tags or indexes metadata to

support its use (Shabaj ee, 2002).

Number 5: Usinn non-library, neonraphic technologies -- Need for human factor: Among

the least topic written about with the largest scope potential is the impact of the increased

availability of information coupled with the advances in information technology retrieval

systems, which is the need for librarians to keep pace with the needs of today's users.

Among issues discussed is the need to incorporate geographic coordinate information to

metadata, using non-traditional library software that will help knowledgeable, technically










Mangan, Elizabeth U. (ed.). 2005. Cartographic materials: a manual of interpretation for
AACR2, 2004 Update prepared by the Anglo-American Cataloguing Committee
for Cartographic Materials, 211d ed. Chicago: American Library Association.

Martell, Charles R. 2005. "The Ubiquitous User: A Reexamination of Carlson' s Deserted
Library", from [Guest Editorial in] portal: Libraries and the Academy. 5, no.
4:441-453.

Maxwell, Robert L. 2004. M~aanell's handbook for AACR2: explaining and illustrating
the Anglo-Anzerican cataloguing rules through the 2003 update. Chicago:
American Library Association.

MAGERT. 2007. The ALA Map and Geography Round Table, retrieved Summer 2007
from http ://www.ala.org/ala/magert/magert.htm .

McEathron, Scott R. 2002. "Cartographic Materials as Works," from Works as Entries
for Information Retrieval, Richard P. Smiraglia, ed. New York, Haworth
Information Press.

National Research Council. 1994. Promoting the national spatial data infrastructure
through partnerships, from: http://www.nap. edu/catalog/4895 .html .

OCLC. 2003. OCLC Bibliographic Formats and Standards. November 2003. [034 versus
255 M4rRC Fields]. Retrieved Fall 2006 from: http://www.oclc. org/bibformats/en.

Onsrud, Harland J. 1995. Role of Law in Impeding and Facilitating the .\lail ing; of
Geographic Infornzation, retrieved Fall 2006 from
http://www. spati al .maine. edu/~onsrud/pub s/rol eoflaw36G.pdf .

Parry, R.B. 1995. "The electronic map library: new maps, new uses, new users," in
LIBER Quarterly, the journal ofEuropean research libraries 5, no 3:262-273.

Parry, Robert B. & Perkins, C. R.. 2000. Worldnzapping today, 211d ed. New Providence,
N.J.: Bowker-Saur.

Pickles, John. 1997. "GIS, Technoscience, and the Theoretical Turn," Annals of the
Association ofAnzerican Geographers. 87, no. 2:263-372.

Rauber, Andreas and Tj oa, A Min. 2000? User interfaces for digital libraries. Retrieved
Summer 2006 from:
http:.//www.ifs.tuwien. ac. at/ifs/general~information/people/tj oa/pub_pdf/raupocg0
1.pdf.

Resort Graphics International. 2000(?). Map of "Key West, Florida" from
http://www. keywe st. com/keywe staeri al/









CHAPTER 1
INTRODUCTION*

The main obj ective of this work is to examine the use of geographic coordinate

information to improve the retrieval and indexing of cartographic materials. The work will touch

upon how the existence of print material libraries--as highly organized information warehouses--

is essential, and how they can help in the organization and presentation of digital and online

libraries. This work will also show how digital libraries can benefit from the established and

uniform way that information is made available (Rauber & Tj oa, 2000). Libraries and their

online catalogs must also compete with search engines and full-text retrieval capabilities that are

taking place on the World Wide Web.

With the need for increasing international collaboration in the delivery of research

materials, library cataloging practices need to be considered to facilitate shared online resources.

Academic and research geographers and librarians must tap into a new technology and impose a

new cultural approach to creating methods suitable for making information retrieval easier.

In order to make good decisions to improve a library database, it is necessary to

understand the process involved in cataloging cartographic information. Current cataloging

mechanisms are not adequate in describing the material in hand due to not putting into practice

rules for providing adequate information. New information retrieval tools are being used to

facilitate the retrieval of information (McEathron, 2002, p. 181). This work will examine how

these can be integrated into current techniques to improve the process of indexing and retrieving

geographic information.



SA significant portion of this thesis appears by permission from Gonzalez, Jorge, (2007) from "Problems that arise
when providing geographic coordinate information for cataloged maps," Coordinates: Online Journal of the Map
and Geography Round Table, 4merican Library association, ser.B, no.8.









APPENDIX A
SURVEY WORK AND ANALYSIS

The survey administered hopes to convey the researcher's dependence on geospatial
information. The survey was distributed to graduate students in geography, placed in the map
library, and handed out in an urban planning GIS class. It is hoped the survey can help provide
feedback and eventually be used to improve search capabilities for cartographic materials, and
also help find additional materials in a more efficient manner. The University of Florida
Libraries may determine which books, magazines, videos, CDs, and maps they acquire, but are
they looking at what researchers need? Should the University Libraries be developing a role with
patrons to adequately provide queried information? Library services have tended to ignore the
traditional needs of the patrons. A study conducted by Gluck (1996) showed a need for
geospatial information,
To connect with others and to imagine and dream. All geospatial
information is not as ideologically or practically based as our
current library services and products seem to dictate. People use
the current products and services but modify them for their needs.
We should be sensitive to those transformations and provide
support for them.

From the survey (Appendices B and C for survey sheet and complete results) carried out
April to May 2007, it was revealed that more than 70% of geography-related researchers at the
University of Florida relied more on the Internet and other sources compared to using the
physical library (~25%) to research and retrieve materials of a cartographic nature. Whatever
independent or across-the-board recent trends or what other subj ect or library branch experiences
may be, the numbers seem to reflect a higher dependence on the non-physical library resources
than on the actual physical buildings where professional help is readily available.

The survey also shows that researchers at the University of Florida look for all types of
cartographic materials when searching the library database: census data, demographic
information, digitized data, GIS materials, statistical documents, aerial photographs, satellite
images, atlases, and other items such as CDs and DVDs containing maps and cartographic
information (Figure A-1). But almost half of those surveyed could not answer if they were
finding an adequate amount of materials of cartographic nature; the remaining half was split
almost evenly between yes and no. A maj ority of those surveyed also responded that they did not
find an adequate amount of materials of a geographic nature in the libraries.

Those surveyed also expressed from a supplied list that a library listing of geographic
materials can be improved by having more geographic headings and more geographic notes,
acquiring more print maps, increasing access to staff, improving geographic literacy, and having
more coordinates information. About 25% of those who responded to the question on whether or
not they rely on latitude/longitude to help retrieve cartographic materials answered yes.
Furthermore, when asked if coordinates or place names would be their preferred searching
method for maps, the maj ority with a preference chose both coordinates and place names as their
answer instead of opting for just one.









resources that have been treated by information management systems whether text-based

systems or GIS (Hill & Janee, pp. 1-2). This service provides a single map for location and does

not produce the plethora of maps that can be found in a map library collection.

An ideal search query is able to integrate a feature type thesaurus into the search interface

for the gazetteer. For querying cartographic materials, they definitely need to be digitized and

geocoded. Georeferencing is the process of taking a street address, by way of a point on a map

identified by geographic coordinates, and converting it into decimal latitude and longitude

coordinates so that they can be displayed in a map database. When trying to locate the segment,

the following geographic references may all be used: street number, street name, street direction,

street type, and the city, state and zip code. The georeferencing is what makes locating addresses

and viewing multiple locations on a map instantly possible.

The benefits of a gazetteer include the use of geographic coordinates, which can provide

the basic structure for named places using map visualization software. Georeferencing is the

intersection of one line of latitude and one line of longitude. As the use of map interfaces

increases, more complex georeferencing, such as using two lines of latitude and longitude to

form a bounding box and polygons approximating actual boundaries, is needed (Buckland, 2007,

p. 381). A georeferencing calculator (Figure 4-4) is a tool to aid in the referencing of localities of

digitized items, such as maps that are found in a library, museum, or similar collections.

Displaying the position of a site geographically can help detect errors and increase data quality.

The GIS tools contain analytical functions which make possible the prediction of spatial

distributions (Wieczorek, 2004, p. 764).










LIST OF REFERENCES


Alexandria Digital Library Proj ect. 2004 Guide to the ADL Gazetteer Content Standard~~ddddddddd~~~~
version 3.2 (2. Overview). Retrieved Fall 2006, from
http://www.alexandria.ucsb.edu/gazetteer/Cnettnadvrin.2/GCS3.2-
guide.htm .

[American Library Association]. 1998. Anglo-Anzerican cataloguing rules prepared under
the direction of the Joint Steering Committee for Revision of AACR, Michael
Gorman and Paul W. Winkler, eds. Chicago: American Library Association.

Andrew, Paige. 2003. Cataloging sheet nzap, the basics. New York: Haworth Information
Press.

Association for Library Collections & Technical Services. 2006. Cataloging and
Description of Cartographic Resources: fCron parchment to pixels, paper to
digital, GIS cataloging (June 23, 2006, ALA Annual Conference), New Orleans,
LA, Larsgaard, Mary, presenter.

Association of College & Research Libraries. 2006. Standar~~dds for~ddd~~ddd~ Libraries in Higher
Education. Approved by the ACRL Board of Directors. Retrieved Summer 2007
from http://www.ala. org/al a/acrl/acrl standards/standardslibrari es.cfm.

Attu Homepage. 2007. Map of "Attu, Alaska" from
http:.//hl swilIliwaw. com/al euti an s/attu-hom ep age. htm

Borgman, C.L., Leazer, G.H., Gilliland-Swetland, A., Millwood, K., Champeny, L.,
Finley, J., Smart, L.J. 2004. How Geography Professors Select Ma'~terials for
Classroom Lectures: Implications for the Design ofDigital Libraries from
Proceedings of the 2004 Joint ACM/IEEE Conference on Digital Libraries. pp
179-185.

Borgman, Christine L. 1996. "Why are online catalogs still hard to use?," Journal of the
American Society for htfornzation Science. 47, no. 7: 493-503.

Bowen, Jennifer. 2005. Report on the JSC meeting, Chicago, April 24-28, 2005,
retrieved Summer 2006 from
http://www.1libraries.psu. edu/tas/j ca/ccda/docs/j sc05 06.pdf .

Boxall, James. 2003. "Geolibraries: Geographers, librarians and spatial collaboration,"
The Canadian Geographer. 47, no.1:18-27.

Boxall, James. 2002. "Geolibraries, the global spatial data infrastructure and digital Earth: a time
for map librarians to reflect upon the moonshot," INSPEL, 36:1










Geography provides the digital library a locational index for facilitating data retrieval, as

allocated by attributes of a georeferenced obj ect. Map and spatial imagery libraries are the

perfect candidates for a geographic approach. Most cataloged material can be geographically

referenced, such as the information from a collection of museum slides entered into a digital

library by location indexing as well as by time period. A collection of butterflies can be

photographed and scanned to produce a collection of Lepidoptera information, including color

images. All the information of any digitized collection can be accessed by many indexes,

including full-text keyword. This collection also includes geographic information such as where

the butterflies migrate and how the species get captured.

Georeferencing relates to items in coordinate systems. A familiar system is expressed as

degrees of latitude (as in north and south) and degrees of longitude (as in east and west). By

using coordinate systems, spatial data from a variety of sources can be compared, organized, and

viewed in combination with one another. Latitude and longitude are commonly expressed as

decimal degrees, and they are commonly used as a coordinate system for digital library

collections.

Geographers who work on geolibraries can become partners, or, better yet, caretakers of

the spatial data. They can develop an increase in access, use, and preservation of cartographic

and other geo-related materials and digitized information. The two sub-disciplines may have had

different paths to their teaching and information gathering approaches, but they have the

potential to become a common ally in providing spatial information. Librarians have focused on

service; the rest of academia has concentrated on research. Yet libraries will remain in place and

continue providing information. While libraries use GIS, their concentration is not on the

technology itself. The focus is the people involved in GIS, in this case geographers, who have




Full Text

PAGE 1

1 ANALYSIS OF SPATIAL INFORMATION TO IMPROVE RETRIEVAL OF CARTOGRAPHIC MATERIALS BY PR OVIDING GEOGRAPHIC COORDINATE INFORMATION By JORGE A. GONZALEZ A THESIS PRESENTED TO THE GRADUATE SCHOOL OF THE UNIVERSITY OF FLOR IDA IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF ARTS UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA 2007

PAGE 2

2 2007 Jorge A. Gonzlez

PAGE 3

3 To my family, all graduate students of Geogr aphy past and present a nd all sentient beings everywhere

PAGE 4

4 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I would like to thank my committee memb ers Dr. Barbara McDade, Dr. HelenJane Armstrong and Dr. Jeff Hurt for all their support and guidance. Also, woul d like to thank Joshua Comenetz, who has been an invaluable source of inspiration, guidance and encouragement. I would also like to thank ev eryone who had anything to do w ith putting up with me while I took on this wonderful project. Finally, I thank Sally Dickinson for her enco uragement and moral support; Paige Andrew for his expertise and guidance, and Jimmie L undgren, for her support and understanding my school needs and scheduling.

PAGE 5

5 TABLE OF CONTENTS page ACKNOWLEDGMENTS...............................................................................................................4 LIST OF FIGURES................................................................................................................ .........7 LIST OF ACRONYMS............................................................................................................... ....8 ABSTRACT....................................................................................................................... ..............9 CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION..................................................................................................................11 2 LITERATURE REVIEW.......................................................................................................14 3 METHODS OF ANALYSIS..................................................................................................24 Approaches Promoting Library Use.......................................................................................24 Outreach....................................................................................................................... ...........29 Exigency in Information Science............................................................................................31 4 CURRENT PRACTICE IN PROV IDING GEOGRAPHIC COORDINATE INFORMATION....................................................................................................................35 Describing Coordinate Representations.................................................................................35 Comparing Coordinate Representations.................................................................................41 Retrieval of Materials......................................................................................................... ....42 Map Services and Mapping Tools..........................................................................................44 Database Discussion............................................................................................................ ...47 Geographical Searching in Library Catalogs..........................................................................48 5 CATALOGING ISSUES IN PROVIDI NG GEOGRAPHIC COORDINATES....................51 Addressing Boundary and Accuracy Issues...........................................................................51 Metadata Language Use.........................................................................................................57 6 SUMMARY AND CONCLUSION.......................................................................................60 APPENDIX A SURVEY WORK AND ANALYSIS.....................................................................................67 B SURVEY RESULTS..............................................................................................................69 C SAMPLE SURVEY SHEET..................................................................................................72

PAGE 6

6LIST OF REFERENCES............................................................................................................. ..74 BIOGRAPHICAL SKETCH.........................................................................................................81

PAGE 7

7 LIST OF FIGURES Figure page 4-1 Bounding boxes are shown as the gray (thin) lined boxes; convex hulls are shown by the black (thick) lines and more closely follow the shape of the state of California on the left and the city of San Jose on the right.....................................36 4-2 Antique map showing parts of Wisc onsin and Michigan with unidentified coordinate system and outdated place names (note CANADA over what is present-day Michigan).. ..............................................................................................38 4-3 Examples of maps lacking conventio nal coordinate information. From upper left clockwise: unidentified alphanumer ic coordinate system (Attu, Alaska), fantasy/imaginary map (Continent of Arthom), tourist map (Daman, India), and aerial photograph of Key West, Fla......................................................................40 4-4 Sample of a georeferencing calculato r for UF Libraries Search for Los Angeles........................................................................................................................47 4-5 Sample screen accommodating li nk to expand search to geographic coordinates...................................................................................................................50 4-6 Sample screens accommodating geographi c coordinate searches for points and for bounding box (Qinchai Province, China)...............................................................50 5-1 Sample of a border dispute of Kashmir region. Source:GNU Free Documentation License. ...............................................................................................52 A-1 Users interest in a variet y of formats as a percentage................................................68

PAGE 8

8 LIST OF ACRONYMS AACR2 Anglo-American Cataloguing Rules (2nd Revision) ADEPT Alexandria Digital Earth Prototype project ADL Alexandria Digital Library ALA American Library Association ACLTS Association for Library Co llections and Technical Services ACRL Associations of College and Re search Libraries (division of ALA) BGN U.S. Board of Geographic Names ESRI Environmental Systems Research Institute FGDC United States Federal Geographic Data Committee FGDL Florida Geographic Data Library GIS Geographic Information Systems GNS GEOnet Names Server GNIS Geographic Names Information System HUL Harvard University Library JSC Joint Steering Comm ittee for revision of AACR ICPFDA International Conference on the Principles and Future Development of AACR MAGERT Map & Geography Round Table (ALA) MARC Machine Readable Cataloging NRC National Research Council OCLC Online Computer Library Center RDA Resource Description and Access USGS United States Geological Survey USPS United States Postal Service

PAGE 9

9 Abstract of Thesis Presen ted to the Graduate School of the University of Florida in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Arts ANALYSIS OF SPATIAL INFORMATION TO IMPROVE RETRIEVAL OF CARTOGRAPHIC MATERIALS BY PR OVIDING GEOGRAPHIC COORDINATE INFORMATION By Jorge Antonio Gonzlez December 2007 Chair: Barbara McDade Major: Geography This work presents research findings on how geographic coordinates can improve the retrieval of library materials at the University of Florida Libraries whil e attempting to provide spatial information to library bibliographic r ecords for more efficient access of cartographic materials. Retrieval and accuracy problems arise because maps are not always published with coordinates. The researcher can follow library cat aloging rules in order to provide coordinates on bibliographic records, and interpolate number s by following strict guide line standards. Bounding boxes and center point coordinates are key components in the library catalog record. Additionally, GIS has universal applications th at apply to interdis ciplinary studies and international cooperation in rega rd to establishing standards. The objective proposed in this work is to see how spatial information through the use of geographic coordinates can help no t only to read and manipulate cartographic data but also to help organize other library materials. By impr oving library classificati on schemes of electronic and digitized materials and also enhancing trad itional classification and retrieval mechanisms and standards, University of Fl orida Libraries catalogers can keep up with the researchers demands for better access to mate rials. The UF Libraries can then attempt to shift to newly

PAGE 10

10 created and shared geographic information syst ems and use spatial data that allow for the retrieval processes to increase usag e, access, and metadata integration. This work explores the importance of unders tanding and applying map cataloging rules to provide the most accurate information possible in the local database. It offers additional methods to help find maps and other cartographic info rmation quickly and accurately from an online retrieval database. A strong need has occurred to standardize spatial data to improve search query responses by providing uniform informati on and by addressing thematic errors. The work will present the idea of using the digital library to help introduce the concept of spatial reference to enhance retrieval capabili ties, teaching, and learning.

PAGE 11

11 CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION* The main objective of this work is to examine the use of geographic coordinate information to improve the retrieval and indexing of cartographic materials. The work will touch upon how the existence of print material librar ies--as highly organized information warehouses-is essential, and how they can help in the or ganization and presentati on of digital and online libraries. This work will also show how digital libraries can benefit from the established and uniform way that information is made availa ble (Rauber & Tjoa, 2000) Libraries and their online catalogs must also compete with search en gines and full-text retrieval capabilities that are taking place on the World Wide Web. With the need for increasing international collaboration in the delivery of research materials, library cataloging practices need to be considered to facilitate shared online resources. Academic and research geographers and librari ans must tap into a new technology and impose a new cultural approach to creating methods suitab le for making information retrieval easier. In order to make good decisions to improve a library database, it is necessary to understand the process involved in cataloging cartographic information. Current cataloging mechanisms are not adequate in describing the ma terial in hand due to not putting into practice rules for providing adequate information. New in formation retrieval tool s are being used to facilitate the retrieval of information (McE athron, 2002, p. 181). This work will examine how these can be integrated into cu rrent techniques to improve the pr ocess of indexing and retrieving geographic information. A significant portion of this thesis appears by permission from Gonzalez, Jorge, (2007) from "Problems that arise when providing geographic coordinate information for cataloged maps," Coordinates: Online Journal of the Map and Geography Round Table, Am erican Library Association ser.B, no.8.

PAGE 12

12 Publications of a cartographi c nature include: atlases, maps, census documents, aerial photographs, and satellite images. Geographic information system (G IS) is a system designed to allow users to collect, manage and analyze spatia lly referenced information. It is critical to understand economic development and have an increased awareness and knowledge of geopolitics. It is a way of cap turing, storing, analyzing and mana ging data which are spatially referenced to the earth. It is necessary to use GIS to improve our understanding of natural resources and the environment. Modern tec hnology allows improved acquisition, distribution, and utilization of geographic and cartographic data. An effort is underway to create an infrastructure at different levels of government and private sectors to s upport applications of spatial data in areas of transportation, ag riculture, emergency response, environmental management, and information technology, museum development and maintenance, and other research related fields (Onsrud, 1995). New technology has made the process of information research available through digitization, which has benefited many disciplin es. Without appropriate geographic elements, bibliographic information will remain dispersed and inaccessible, and also dependent on inexact description executed by untrained ca talogers (Lai & Gillies, 1991). Place names are readily defined by librarians through geographic subject headings, and they are a way of describing locatio n for library materials. They ar e useful for identifying spatial information as locational or place name headi ngs in text form (Woodr uff & Plaunt, 1999). As technology via the Internet has brought the wo rld to our doorstep, people have become increasingly more aware of what is out there, but usually need ing to find out where exactly out there is. Human activity of every nature requir es space and exactitude, location becomes critical

PAGE 13

13 information. This work will therefore focus on the benefits and uses of providing geographic coordinates to library bibliographi c records of a cartographic nature. The basic information discussed will concen trate on providing geogr aphic coordinates to library map records. Libraries seek to organi ze everything, including th e geographic nature of materials, in a way where a researcher will fi nd explicit location classi fication central to his queries. Indexing and searching, an d--for the researcher--finding are fundamental operations in making retrieval of materials more efficient. The cataloging goal in libraries, including cartographic materials, is for the cataloger to pr epare the material in hand for its most accurate accessibility by indexing each document from es tablished nationally and internationally recognized standards. Searching for cartographic materials, as with other library materials, may be done directly by examining shelved items or by searching vicar iously via databases in the online catalog. Cataloging is the most fundamental operation of indexing library material s (Dillon & Jul, 1996). This action recognizes groups of cl asses of objects, as in cartographic materials, via map cabinet or shelf placement order and the classificati on schema. Library classification will help the researcher use a number of different devices --enhanced with geographic coordinates--for retrieving materials from the physical co llection or from digitized information. This work will demonstrate a need to reac t to the changes occurring in information technology by looking at the way libr aries, and cataloging methods sp ecifically, are using spatial referencing to enhance or improve library research. This work will offer a systematic approach to providing coordinate information based on estab lished guidelines followed by discussing the issues involved in providing them.

PAGE 14

14 CHAPTER 2 LITERATURE REVIEW Geographic Information Systems (GIS) ma y represent a new way of looking at information (to librarians, not necessarily ge ographers). Such systems integrate computer hardware, software, data, and th e human mind to bring new perspe ctives to problem-solving. To solve spatial-related problems, it is necessary to have georeferenced information or data that can be layered with more data. As an emerging techno logy for libraries, GIS rais es a host of issues: cost, a steep learning curve, and a lot of comput er space. At the same time, it is an attractive technology that most proponents cl aim has revolutionized the way people look at the world and the way to solve the issues of switching from print to digitization technology. Writings about geolibraries and access to information, archiving, and collection development, have tended to over simplify-library issues or focus too much on the computational aspects of libraries. It is assumed that GIS user s regard metadata standards and processes related to information description as new or unique or even highly technical (Boxall, 2002). In regard to geolibraries : geography and spatial informati on are the catalyst for this new virtual information repository. But maybe this is the new archetype for the old fields of geography and library science? Geography and library science are natural pa rtners in this new development. Technology, chiefly digitized inform ation on the Internet, is the primary operator in the need for libraries to ad apt to this new-found home for GIS and spatial information. The geolibrary, as defined by Michael Goodchild ( 1998, quoted in Boxall, 2003, p. 20), is one filled with georeferenced information and based upon the notion that information may have a geographic footprint. While geogr aphers worked with geographi c information, the idea now is being able to work or contribute to georefer enced information, such as photographs, videos, music, and literature--all pr oviding a locational variable a nd needing a locational search.

PAGE 15

15 Geolibraries have both geographic and digi tal information, while digitization is the direction that information is headed since the spatial information being produced needs geographers to organize and access it The fast movement in technology in regard to spatial-data infrastructure has brought libraries and geography together like two fa st trains about to crash into each other. This technology has put many ad hoc groups racing to come up with a common language for new common goals. With the rapid developments in the digitizati on of maps and other lib rary print materials and also the creation of Internet networks and databases, access to geographical information is increasing at a surprising rate. The technologi cal environment has developed so that it can facilitate seemingly complicated spatial operation s. Digitized maps and spatial data from other digitized materials have been c oded to provide information for general purposes. This basic use allows the use of the Internet for easily downl oaded information from around the world, and it is not unusual for researchers and other Web user s to acquire real-time observational data. One fact stands out among the discussed pros and cons: geographic refe rencing is here to stay and has become a fixture in 21st century lib raries just as automated catalogs and multimedia collections have been available for quite a while. New ways need to be used to index the information that technology has made available to researchers--but not wi thout the benefits of traditional skills of librarianship. The library professional must evaluate user needs, select data, prepare and catalog data for users, and design, serve, and manage public services. In fact, if there is anything significant that libraria ns have discovered about georef erencing their materials, it is that they cannot do it alone. More than any other service, spatia l information and GIS are perfect opportunities for libraries to pa rtner with outside entities, specifically geographers.

PAGE 16

16 The creation of print databases, as digitized materials, and the metadata to accompany the materials, while applying GIS to create databases, have shifted from what was a static geography of book production to an active spat ial form of information. Geographic concepts have taken the forefront due to the ability of GIS to provide attention to diffe rent academic fields by layering information that contributes to the broader understanding of what is communicated. Conversely GIS addresses the needs of specific studies, su ch as demography, economic history, and social history. Geographic Information Systems would pr ovide a link to disparate sources and allow comparison and close examination of various print materials. Map classification is a proce ss that involves an orderly a nd systematic assignment of each item to one and only one class number w ithin a system of mutu ally exclusive and nonoverlapping classes (e.g., where G4410 will be as signed to Mexico or G8200 to Africa and up and down the geographically related range). This process must be syst ematic and orderly: systematic because it mandates consistent applicati on of these principles within a framework of a prescribed ordering of reality, and orderly because it carries out an established set of principles that govern the structure of es tablished classes. While a sche me itself can be established by anyone, purpose and meaningful organization must be considered. Also to be taken into account a history and tradition of mate rials indexed under the system with room for amending and improving as the need arises that librarians most li kely are qualified to pr ovide (Smith & Sproles, 2004, p. 23). Maps are defined mainly by using bounding-box coordinates and point locations within a radius of a point, in addition to administrative subdivision, or locality description, using, when necessary, a standard thesaurus such as the Libr ary of Congress Subject Headings (LCSH). This

PAGE 17

17 indexing will not restrict researchers to just di gitized databases but also to the improvement of analog materials or the physic al library (Smits, 2000, p. 509). Geographic headings consist of two type s: jurisdictional a nd non-jurisdictional. Jurisdictional headings are most commonly used as corporate body entries. These entries are names of groups or governments associated as an entity on bibliographic records, making them capable of being identified as author of a mate rial cataloged while they can also be used as subject headings. These subjects are established according to the rules in AACR2, Chapter 23. Traditionally, names of countries and administ rative divisions within countries, such as provinces, states, counties, and cities, take on a jurisdictional heading entry (HUL, 2006), (e.g., eventually being able to group countries as Ea st and West Germany in to one group: Germany). Geographical information is found in many fo rms whether visual (maps, aerial photos, and remote sensing images) or textual (surveys reports, technical pape rs). Although geographic information has been indexed spatially through GIS, reports and other text materials have relied for decades on the indexing of library catalog met hods. As libraries continue to digitize more visual and textual information, a greater need has arisen to comp lement this information with spatially referenced headings. Geography must be viewed as information space for the simple reason that digitized information is seen as spatial (Cai, 2001). According to Larsgaard (1996), With very few exceptions, every reference question for planetospatial data starts out with location, (p.28). So, it has quickly been determined that bounding coordinates are essent ial. For spatial data in digital form, this information is often in the header or derivable from inside the digi tal data. For aerial photographs, deriving spatial information is a nightmare because you have no geographic references come into play. Software

PAGE 18

18 is needed that determines these coordinates, and GIS and image processing software may have the needed answers. Because library science has developed under th e strictest standards and research rules, and has been able to integrate, albeit at a slower pace than demanded by the public, the spatial analysis needed for geographical searches of lib rary materials. The open systems architecture, application programming, the capabi lity to support integration with other software, and computer languages and geographic coordinate s that GIS supplies have all enabled specific and demanding application development to go with the gr eater demand placed on librarians to provide information. An essential component of indexing cartogra phic digitized material s is the processing functions. What needs to be addressed is how ge ography as a field will pl ay a role in not only providing geographic data but how GIS technologies fit the model of digital libraries According to Jue (1996), Part of the problem with the introduction of GIS into a public library setting is that there has been little research on ways to make accessing and use of digital spatial data easier for the casual data users, a cate gory in which most public library users fall (p.210). Specifically, since location is a dynamic and effective way to organize information, geographic coordinates can be us ed to interface all cartographic information and digitization processing in regard to spatial data. Coordinate s can help search for geographic information by way of a graphic interface and text searching of physical locations, and may provide for hard copy output results from its queried data. The development of cartographic cataloging sche mes needs could benefit from a base in geography. A spatial component is necessary to classify cartographic materials. Adequate research is also needed to determine if some me thods of locating spatial resources are better than

PAGE 19

19 others. From what has been experi enced at libraries, it appears th at it may be a long time before the most appropriate solutions can be found. Maps are ofte n among the largest and least controlled in a library 's collection (Smith & Sproles, 2004, p. 23). Cataloging has been important in describi ng traditional library materials. However, traditional library cataloging elements lack certain descriptive information that meets the needs of a new generation of savvy Internet users w ho are locating spatial resources and demanding search alternatives. Traditional library cataloging is st ruggling to adapt to the needs of locating resources and establishing standa rds. However, traditional library cataloging has provided a level of refinement for information retrieval that is highly successful fo r manual retrieval of bibliographic items. Map libraries have traditionally relied on place names for geographical searches. Geographic coordinates using lati tude and longitude can compleme nt spatially related searches. Using these coordinates will allow for established re lationships in relation to information near or between those identified points or lines. Library catalog records are constantly indexed with geographic data that are provided for future use (Buckland, 2007, p. 376). Providing geographic coordinates to library bi bliographic records can be the requirement to improve retrieval of digita l spatial data cataloging. This geographic information approach attempts to use the tools of spatial databases an d data analysis as a basis for cataloging spatial metadata. This approach is needed because a mo re complex set of require ments than traditional catalog-based systems would be inva luable to many experienced spatial data users. The trend in this approach is the development of browsers that allow searchers to graphically browse datasets from one or more databases.

PAGE 20

20 University and research libraries will use th eir digital collections for class work and research. With electronic access, libraries and university programs will share information more effectively with other universities and lear ned institutions. Geographic cataloging has been important in describing traditional library mate rials. However, traditional library cataloging elements lack certain descriptive information th at meets the needs of a new generation of savvy Internet users who are locating spatial resources and demanding se arch alternatives. Traditional library cataloging is struggling to adapt to th e needs of locating resources and establishing standards (i.e., the term wetlands defined by the United States Ge ological Society (USGS) as a vegetated area that is inundated or saturated by surface or ground water for a significant part of the year). These standards may be identified to other users as: backwaters, bayous, bogs, fens, mangrove swamps, marshes, mires, mud flats, peat lands, salt marshes, sloughs, and swamps. They can include broader terms as biogeographic re gions or narrower terms, such as bays, guts, lakes, playas, and streams as found in the Li brary of Congress Subject Headings (LCSH). However, traditional library ca taloging has provided a level of refinement for information retrieval that is highly su ccessful for manual retrieva l of bibliographic items. A geographic approach to provi ding coordinates and other spa tial information is needed because a more complex set of requirements than traditional catalog-based systems would be useful to many experienced spatial data users. Th e greatest value to this approach will be the ability to interact with catalog-based systems and simultaneously be used over a global network environment. The trend in this approach is the development of browsers that allow searchers to graphically browse datasets fr om one or more databases.

PAGE 21

21 Geography provides the digital libr ary a locational index for fac ilitating data retrieval, as allocated by attributes of a ge oreferenced object. Map and spa tial imagery libraries are the perfect candidates for a geographic approach. Mo st cataloged material can be geographically referenced, such as the information from a colle ction of museum slides entered into a digital library by location indexing as well as by tim e period. A collection of butterflies can be photographed and scanned to produce a collection of Lepidoptera informa tion, including color images. All the information of any digitized collection can be acc essed by many indexes, including full-text keyword. This collection also includes geographic information such as where the butterflies migrate and how the species get captured. Georeferencing relates to items in coordinate systems. A familiar system is expressed as degrees of latitude (as in north and south) and de grees of longitude (as in east and west). By using coordinate systems, spatial data from a va riety of sources can be compared, organized, and viewed in combination with one another. Lat itude and longitude are commonly expressed as decimal degrees, and they are commonly used as a coordinate system for digital library collections. Geographers who work on geolibraries can beco me partners, or, better yet, caretakers of the spatial data. They can develop an increase in access, use, and preservation of cartographic and other geo-related materials and digitized information. The tw o sub-disciplines may have had different paths to their teaching and informa tion gathering approaches, but they have the potential to become a common ally in providing spatial information. Librarians have focused on service; the rest of academia has concentrated on research. Yet libraries will remain in place and continue providing information. While libraries use GIS, thei r concentration is not on the technology itself. The focus is the people involved in GIS, in this case geographers, who have

PAGE 22

22 assumed that metadata and standard issues are of the technical nature. So these two fields must collaborate to come up with new collaborative ideas or approaches to indexing geographically. Traditionally, geography has been about gath ering information in the field. The spatial process researched by geographers has been accl aimed and used by closely related disciplines. For example, urban geography deals with research and information on spatial processes, such as urbanization and gentrification info rmation that have been used in other academic fields. It is difficult to deny that geography is a fundamental s ource of research informa tion with a scientific approach, but this comes with an expectation and a responsibility to make explanations and policies regarding spatial processes easily understood. Geography must provide clear answers and a clear direction to tackle these issues. Geography can address how the collection, or ganization, presentati on, and retrieval of digitized information can be processed wh ile at the same time providing and producing geographic information by means of georeferen ced spatial data. Geogr aphy curricula can be developed to concentrate on making it easy to fi nd items of interest and how to manipulate the information in as many ways as possible, such as being able to re-compu te data and create new maps and datasets. In turn, the digital and phys ical map library becomes a tool for teaching. Applied research must explore the potential of the software en vironment and develop tools by designing prototypes. John Pickles, a distinguished geography profe ssor, attempted to answer how geographic information can help libraries in his paper Demystifying the Persistent Ambiguity of GIS as tool vs. science Pickles states that albeit GIS has ar rived and lived up to its promises, new technologies continue to enha nce what is achievable and ac cessible to more people (1997,

PAGE 23

23 pp.363-364). The double-edged sword to all of geogra phys ails is that ov ernight GIS created a huge demand for technical skills from faculty and staff creating a small hiring pool. Furthermore, the diffusion and advances of information technology have contributed to a crisis which Pickles identified, The crisis of technological science is also a crisis of liberal legal and political theory. What constitutes appropriate methodology in the social sciences is thoroughly conditioned by the broader repr esentational systems of political belief on which liberalism is founded. This is the Pandoras Box that critical human geographers opened from the 1970s onwards. [The book] Demystifying calls for the hard work of theory to begin the necessity of carrying out this hard work through the traditions of thoughtand ... cal ls for a theoretical turn in geography that began in the 1970s. (Pickles, 1997, p. 370) Jan Smits, noted Dutch cartographer and libra rian, and great contri butor to the filed of map and geography librarianship, The most relevant source of information for researchers in th is book is a piece of software called Earth, which keeps track of every bit of spa tial information that it owns all the maps, weather data, archit ectural plans, and satellite surveillance stuff. When this step is taken further, one may also add to these geospatial data all locational data, which is part of an alogue and digital al phanumerical objects and databases, keeping in mind that a lo t of spatial phenomena, including human activity, are constantly monitored (2002, p. 22). Michael F. Goodchild (2004, p. 10), professo r of geography at the University of California, Santa Barbara; conducte d research related to geographi c information science, spatial analysis, the future of the library, and uncer tainty in geographic data. Goodchild stated: The traditional library has relied on author title, and subject as the keys to its catalog. Although one might imagine using geographic location as a key, the technical difficulties associated with doi ng so in a traditional library are profound. But they are comparatively trivial in a digital library, and several WWW sites now support search of their information archives using geogr aphic location as a primary key. One can search the site of the Environmental Protection Agency for all information related to a particular area, such as a ZIP code. A geolibrary is defined as a digital libra ry that is search able by geographic location, returning maps, images, reports, photographs, and even pieces of music identified with a particular location.

PAGE 24

24 CHAPTER 3 METHODS OF ANALYSIS Approaches Promoting Library Use This research will demonstrate a need for further proposals and projects in order to evaluate, promote and increase the use of the li brary, and to advocate th e benefits of using professional reference librarians. This resear ch will also make researchers aware of the limitless availability of materials accessible to them. Librarians and library paraprofessionals, as with teachers, must see how technology can support standards, f acilitate library use, and make learning interesting for students and researcher s. Technology must enhanc e lessons taught in order for the lessons to be effective. Seven major themes, or approaches, identified as methods to encourage library patrons to visit, participate, and use the library with more frequency. Three of the seven categories (underlined) kept appearing in the course of this research that mostly related to improving access to and retrieval of materials specifically while simultaneously increasing use of the libraries. The seven major themes are: 1. Improved library/bibliographic instruction 2. Surveys/evaluations and user behavior observations 3. Improving virtual access to materials 4. Adjustments to bibliographic content or classification of materials 5. Using non-library, geographic tec hnologies -Need for human factor 6. Promoting (information) literacy -Promoting policies that encourage use 7. Reviewing/improving physical barriers/design Number 3: Improving virt ual access to materials : One of the strongest cases is for user awareness and acceptance of digita l libraries. A promotion of ba sic terminology and ease of use navigation must occur. Users must be made to feel less overwhelmed by the increasing number of materials available. Making users aware of the difficulties of logging into a digital environment will also help. Looking into the usabili ty issues and challenges, users will encounter

PAGE 25

25 how librarians can assist. One approach that must be taken is the challeng e of making use of map retrieval efficient for the end-us er, how education can help this and how library polices must be aligned with those of its pa rent institution (Roes, 2001). Libraries can provide information systems that can effectively deliver quality educational materials, which are readily accessible and useful. Digital libraries have b een called on to take care of providing search materials. A widely held belief is that di gital libraries are the remedy to improve library information retrieval. Regarding consequences relate d to the lack of direct hum an contact, researchers would likely want to see improved ways of retrieving information. Sources woul d be available right from their desktop. Researchers, as virtual libr ary users accessing online databases, catalogs, and other Internet resource s, are becoming more te chnologically savvy. It may not be beneficial to researchers if they are unable to develop sear ch skills and utilize the knowledge and skills of librarians to help them locate the most appropria te resources. On the other hand, libraries risk being bypassed by this technology and losing releva nce to students and faculty if they do not establish their presence in bibliogr aphic instruction. Librarians need to be proactive. Then need to insert links to resources and to library assistan ce within their classification domain in order to retain visibility, to increase their relevance with researchers, and to s how their ability to find appropriate materials (Shank, 2006, Intro.). Number 4: Adjustments to bibliographic content or classification of materials : This category is essential as a response to users needs. This category puts together all the tools that can be reviewed and amended in the classification rules and schema that librarians use. Some articles attempt to look at old standards in di fferent ways, even how a library classification system can help with scientific research because of its hierarchical design, thus helping students

PAGE 26

26 find the materials they need. Databases outside th e library can be incorporated to complement the librarys own databases. An attempt needs to be made to find a ba lance between what the users comprehend and the nuances that metadata quality control requires. Anot her way to look at qua lity control is to rate the database by how well it can answer questi ons and not just how well it can retrieve a list of sources. The secret to database improvement appears to be organization. But how can the database be better organized w ithout the input of the users? As larger quantities of materials are entere d into library databa ses, users are often overwhelmed with information. Increasing the to tal number of items makes it more difficult to find materials. As hypertext increases, the resolu tion of searching by way of storing many items increases the complexity of searching. Tradit ional libraries solve these problems by grouping them together. Electronically, a similar way is needed to organize this increasing amount of information. Highlighting frequent words and phras es and grouping related subject topics can be effective in helping retrieve wh at the user needs. Counterbala ncing the displaying of too many entries using hypertext, the user is left with displaying titles by hi erarchical category. The general idea is to apply techniques that solve attempts at detailed queries and get right results the first time (Lesk, 1989, Intro.). One problem that must be overcome is the perc eption that online catalogs continue to be difficult to use because their design does not take into account users searching behavior. A false belief exists that a search is independent of further searches assuming that there is no need to formulate different options to explore a topic. Ideally, the approach is that online catalogs will be judged by how well they answer questions and the ease of transferring information to other systems, and not by how well they match queri es. For many years it has been argued which

PAGE 27

27 online catalogs are difficult to use because their design does not incorporate sufficient understanding of searching behavior. In the short term, librarians can help make online catalogs easier to use through improved training and documen tation that is based on information-seeking behavior, but good training is not a substitute for a good system design. A more permanent goal will be to design intuitive systems that require a minimum of instruction. Given the complexity of the information retrieval problem and the limited capabilities of todays systems, librarians are not close to achieving th at goal (Borgman, 1996). Ideally, an attempt must be made to find a ba lance that serves a di verse range of library users while making the indexing and management of the database retrieva ble. The library shall be able to serve outside campus researchers, extension workers, and correspondence studies students. Library professionals need to ask researchers to help in the development of an informed decision-making process that st rikes a balance between comp rehensibility and metadata standards. Metadata standards are information content for the purpose of providing a common set of terminology and definitions for concepts relate d to the field of study. Metadata is also data about the content, quality, condi tion, and other data characteri stics. Researchers cannot be overlooked when focusing on the development of a system that tags or indexes metadata to support its use (Shabajee, 2002). Number 5: Using non-library, geographic technologies -Need for human factor : Among the least topic written about with the largest scope potential is the impact of the increased availability of information coupled with th e advances in information technology retrieval systems, which is the need for librarians to keep pace with the need s of todays users. Among issues discussed is the need to incor porate geographic coordinate information to metadata, using non-traditional library software that will help knowledgeable, technically

PAGE 28

28 inclined users. At the same time librarians can pass this knowledge on to those technically challenged. Digital advances have created a decline in the use of libraries while increasing the need of real person/real-time help. But libraries will continue their role as research institutions even with the increase in accessing materials via th e Internet. The library will need to adjust by not just being an immovable build ing but a dynamic collection of ma terial able to come to the researcher (Rusbridge, 1998). Using digital libraries will help in teachi ng and learning by integrating the use of the digital library and introducing the concept of spatial referenc e to facilitate retrieval of information for researchers. A goal of the Alexan dria Digital Earth Protot ype project (ADEPT) is to make primary resources in geography useful for academic instruction in ways that will promote inquiry learning. The ADEPT educatio n and evaluation team found that professors desired the ability to search by concept (erosion, continental drif t, and glaciation) as well as geographic location. Resources in spatial digital libr aries are typically described by location. Enhancements regarding searching capabilities will include the abil ity to contribute and to share personal collections of resources and capability to manipulate data and images. Students learn science through inquiries that imitate what scientists practice (Borgman, 2004, p. 179). Though they are using GIS, few librari es have focused on the technology. New technology must be used effectivel y but not without the traditiona l skills of librarianship. The library professional must evaluate user needs, sel ect data, prepare and catalog data for users, and also design, serve, and manage public services. In fact, concerning GIS-ba sed services, librarians have discovered that they cannot do it alone. More than a ny other service, GIS requires collaboration in the library and partnerships with outside entities, specif ically geographers, due to its interdisciplinary approaches.

PAGE 29

29 Many developments in new technology and in formation sciences have formed the foundation for a growing importance of spatial analysis. This is an exciting frontier that likely will bring significant gains in the technical and th eoretical skills and knowledge associated with GI science. In order to accomplish some signifi cant advance, data analysis and computation will continue to be necessary. In addition, these advances are very likely to continue in an interdisciplinary environment where traditio nal boundaries are brought down. The GIS and library science communities can seize this opportunity and pr ovide the means to develop spatially integrated standards. Outreach Proposals and can be carried out to evaluate, promote, and increase th e use of the library in general and to advocate the benefits of using professional reference librarians. Users become aware of the virtually endless av ailability of research materi als accessible to them. Among the findings from the readings, the research of relevant sources applies mostly to pedagogy, educational and information technology, and other met hods to increase library use, this work will note the adage that more access points on a biblio graphic record will improve query results for the library user. The idea discussed is to provide geographic c oordinates to all map bibliographic records. This work will present the problems faced with implementing this presumed helpful tool in accomplishing the task of improving search queries. No attempt has been made to claim that providing geographic coordinates to records will reverse the decline of use of libraries in this new digital age. But there is a need to provide extensive information as more people are not using librarians services (Mar tell, 2005). It is important to note that libr ary patrons and researchers must learn that the sources exist and that the libr ary has them. The end result is

PAGE 30

30 improving users access to information whether they take it for granted or appreciate it as much as a librarian. Researchers need to search for specific locatio ns in a database and to retrieve relevant items based on coordinates provided. The searchi ng and retrieval has to be done efficiently and effectively, even when the scale of the database reaches the as tronomical terabyte size. Not only do the items need to be digitized but also indexe d appropriately so they can be retrieved (Larson, 1996). The map librarian have the re sponsibility of promoting the use of the map library and increasing the value of the collection. Dawn Youngblood, curator at Southern Methodist University, outlined the following recommendations: When new cartographic materials arrive, inform members of the appropriate discipline. If you have foreign language maps th at no one uses, contact professors and students in the language departme nts and make them aware of their existence and usefulness. Give public speaking presentations with maps or PowerPoint presentations with scanned maps at info rmal talks or brown bags. When patrons enter the map collection, ask them if they are aware of the other resources in the collections. Offer patrons courses on map making or using GIS to create their own maps (2006, pp 62-63). Map librarians need to assess their users needs if they are to find digital solutions to their inquiries, and they need to think digital" to start identifying the kinds of queries which can work better with electronic technology, as opposed to the traditiona l and conventional paper mapbased solutions. Digitally based electronic cartographic materials have the potential to deliver more efficient information than the map sheet (Parry, 1995). Besides queries by geographic coordinates, us ers may be interested in other measured information, such as altitudes, orientation, gradie nt, distances, scale, dist ance between points and

PAGE 31

31 land areas. Map librarians must play a bigger in teractive role with the users of their map collections. The advancement of digital mapping in to the traditional stru cture of the paper map library gives librarians and users the opportunity to discov er and learn the func tionality of digital maps. Map librarians will continue the dual role of guides, helping pe ople understand and make sense of graphic images whether digitized or on paper (Parry, 1995). A shifting of educational requirements must o ccur for the professional librarians if there is any hope to keep up with the technology needed for them to promote library use. Librarians need to incorporate geographic coordinate representation into metadata for all types of information objects. They need to develop gazetteer services to translate place names in subject headings and coordinates to aid library cataloging to facilitate information retrieval services. Librarians involvement and active engagement of researchers can help find the balance needed to improve organization of materials. Exigency in Information Science This work is an opportunity to point out the problems that libraries face with keeping up with the changes occurring in information scie nce and technology. This opportunity presents a chance to look at the change that may be identifi ed as the crisis part of an incoming paradigm shift. Kuhn (cited in Smits, 2002) used the term paradigm to denote a generally accepted set of assumptions and procedures that serve to define both subjects and methods of scientific inquiry: When the assumptions and the procedur es which serve them cannot answer anymore the aim for which they have been formulated or when the aim seems in need of reformulation as the answers ar e not adequate anymore, new assumptions and procedures have to be formulated which might answer the questions posed. Researchers need to be provided access to libr ary resources in a timel y and orderly fashion Library collections and library cataloging system must be organized using national bibliographic standards. The catalog or library database provides access for multiple concurrent users and

PAGE 32

32 attempts to indicate all resources available. Provisions are to be made for circulation agreements and access to virtual electronic collections, and also have some way of accessing materials not owned by the library. Policies regarding access will be appropriately disseminated to library users (ACRL, 2006). Anglo-American Cataloguing Rules (AACR) ar e designed for use in the construction of library record catalogs. These rules cover the description and access points for all library materials, including those of a car tographic nature. The publicati on deals with the provision of information describing an item being cataloged, and determining what subject headings or access points will be used as descriptive informa tion on the catalog for the users. Since 1967, AACR has been used by library professionals with high ly developed cataloging cont ent standards, or an agreed upon way of processes and procedures. Revisions in the standards since 1978, known as AACR2, clearly define and provi de and examples of the catal oging process extending with clearly defined rules and practical examples. These rules and examples represent standards that apply to all types of reso urces which now include me tadata formats (ALA, 1998). Unfortunately, as information technology ha s advanced through recent years leaving librarians and information people trying to keep up, more information has also tried to keep pace to help professionals interpret the rules--but with mixed results. Other pr actical and authoritative cataloging how-to books were published, designed to interpret and explain AACR2 changes as information science continued to develop. For instance, Maxwells Handbook for AACR2 (1997) illustrates and applies the latest cataloging rule s to the MAchine-Readable Cataloging (MARC) record for every type of information form at. Focusing on integrating resources, MARC addresses programs for cooperative cataloging an d the cataloging needs of electronic books and digital reproductions of physical it ems, such as books and maps.

PAGE 33

33 As information technology continues to rapidl y change with the Inte rnet and digitization of materials, a strong need has arisen to update standards yet again. While there was a process to start new revisions to create AAC R3, as changes were being addr essed, a decision was made to change the approach and start new standards. Work on the new standard began in 2004 and by 2005 a new approach was agreed to. The d ecision was made to adopt the title: RDA: Resource Description and Access The reason for the change was to approach cataloging from the digital environment instead of the previous textual analog environment. This change is an attempt to include guidelines and instructions for description and access for both digital and analog resources that will also be used in a variety of dig ital environments (Bowen, 2005). While new information technologies have ra ised questions and concerns followed by calls for fundamental revisions and discussion of the history a nd principles of AACR, a joint steering committee for revisions of these rules addressed thes e issues. Concurrently, this committee is taking into account present and fu ture trends in information resources and information management. Many meetings took place to review the underlying principles of the rules, with a view to determining whether fundame ntal rule revision is ap propriate and to advice on the direction of those revisions (ICPFDA, 1998). Additionally, a separate Anglo-American Cataloguing Committee for Cartographic Materials is specifically in place to help deal with the collection and description of maps and other geographic-related material s. Representatives fr om member institutions and associations are recognized as experts on the bibliographi c control of cartographic materials. The Cartographic materials: a manual of interpretation for AACR2 (Mangan, 2005) was produced by this committee. Its aim is to help catalogers interpret and apply the ru les given in AACR2 and additional information useful for atlases, early cartographic mate rials, electronic resources, and

PAGE 34

34 remote sensing images. To further emphasize the complexity of agreeing to standards, it is important to point out that th ey come by way of internationa l cooperative efforts. Such AACR practices come with input from the United Kingdom, Canada, and Australia. Prior to 1950 the tradition was to consider the geographic place and date of maps as important and relevant information for indexing, bu t soon afterwards more maps began to appear in catalogs (Lubas, 2003). Furthermore to provide peer group help and exchange ideas, the Map and Geography Round Table (MAGERT, 2007) is in the American Library Association. It has been around since 1980, and today is the world' s largest map library organization. This group provides a forum for people interested or invo lved in any aspect of map or geography librarianship. Map catalogers can use MAGERT to exchange ideas regarding map collections, and they can work as an advocate group for the use and control of map collections, can include regular meetings to discuss informative progr ams, and can meet other map professionals. MAGERT publishes is own newsletter, journal, books, and occasional papers. The cooperative work among geographic librarians is complemented in part by the use of list-servs, such as Maps-L. In addition to agreed-upon rules, an importa nt supplement for profe ssionals dealing with maps is the book World Mapping Today (Parry & Perkins, 2 002). This book provides information on the production, acquisitions, and dist ribution of maps and other forms of spatial data. This publication is one of the primary reference sources and research tools for anyone involved in maps and spatial da ta. The book provides access to information about policies and programs of the mapping industry within each country. Due to the fact that most maps are not yet digitally available or cataloge d, they are difficult to find, wh ich adds to the argument for providing geographic coordina tes to library records of cartographic materials.

PAGE 35

35 CHAPTER 4 CURRENT PRACTICE IN PROVIDING GEOGRAPHIC COORDINATE INFORMATION Describing Coordinate Representations Coordinates that are provided in library bibliographic record s allow users to find specific points or areas on the earth's surface, as repres ented on the map. The labeling and recording of these points are governed by rules that library catalogers follow to best describe the cartographic item in hand. The paragraphs that follow will en compass the work behind providing geographic coordinate information to comply with library and metadata standard s and simultaneously be easy to interpret and useful for the researcher. A center point or two-point set system of coordinate values identifies a specific point on the earth's surface, often used to show a point of elevation or the loca tion of a city on a map. Map catalogers historically have been providing bounding (box) coordinates or a set of four points that surround some geographic region, as shown on a map (Andrew, 2003, pp. 94-95). A number of sheet maps identify the four coordina te points representing the interior area that has been mapped. The variety of interpretations of map cataloging rules lead s catalogers to providing coordinates whether or not they appear on a map. This is further complicated by asking for interpolation, or rather the estimate of a coordinate value from other known information from the map, which may result in faulty measurements and human error. Bounding boxes (Figure 4-1) are the smallest boxes possible that show longitude and latitude lines with sides that enclose the extent of the coordinates of the map or th e area of coverage. They are also known as minimum bounding rectangles (Hill, 2006). The rule for providing coordinates is consid ered optional to apply, but when a cataloger uses this rule practice dictates that the coor dinates are provided as a set forming a bounding box or rectangle. The push for provi ding coordinate information cont ributes to the ability of new

PAGE 36

36 search engines to retrieve reco rds using coordinates. But currently old systems are being adapted so more recent library software allows such searches in the collections represented. Figure 4-1. Bounding boxes are shown as the gray (thin) lined boxes; co nvex hulls are shown by the black (thick) lines and more closely follo w the shape of the state of California on the left and the city of San Jose on the right. Source:Larson & Fronteira, 1994. Scale information shown on maps is provided by the cataloger in two locations and in different formats. One of the MARC fields (i.e., components or pieces of information defined for a specific indexing application) us ed to display this information is the 034 (Coded Cartographic Mathematical Data) field, containing data for scale and coordinates. Scale information and coordinates, when provided, are presented in numerical form, though coordinate values also include the abbreviation in text ual form of the hemispheres being covered (Andrew, 2003, p. 42). Also, coordinate data values may be given eith er in the form of hddd mmss (hemisphere-degreesminutes-seconds) or as decimal degrees. The degree, minute, and second sub-elements are each right justified and unused positions contai n zeros (Library of Congress, 2006). Example of a map covering most of the Earth in degrees/minutes/seconds: hdddmmss (hemisphere, degree, minutes, seconds) 034 1_ a ||b 22000000 ||d W1800000 ||e E1800000 ||f N0840000 ||g S0700000

PAGE 37

37 Example in decimal degrees for Fairbanks, Alaska: hddd.dddddd (hemisphere, decimal number) 034 1_ a ||d E148.778114 ||e E146.409811 ||f N065409163 ||g N64.6000099 The 034 MARC field is directly based on part s of information from another MARC field, 255 (Cartographic Mathematical Data). Present cataloging practice makes it optional to include bounding coordinates that appear on a map, but when they are included in the bibliographic record, they must be included in both 255 and 034 fields. The 255 field cont ains the coordinates in degree, minute, and second (dms) symbols, with appropriate hemisphere denoted, and the field must contain a scale statement as either a re presentative fraction when known or through the means of a standard phrase such as Scale not given (www.oclc.org). Examples of coordinates in 255 field: d m s (degrees, minutes, seconds) 255 ||a Scale 1:250,000 ||c (E 32'07--E 34'12 /N 3530'11--N 350'00). Bounding box for Cyprus, or 255 ||a Scale not given ||c (W 125--W 65/N 49--N 25). Bounding box for United States. Both fields are repeatable, meaning they can provide coordinate information for multiple maps appearing on the same sheet or additiona l sheets that make up the entire region. The coordinate information is provided as long as th e information is present or can be estimated. Greenwich is assumed when no prime meridian is identified on the map. If a different meridian is specified on an antique map (Figure 4-2), the cataloger records the coordinates in Greenwich, but may choose to give other meridians provide d in the notes area of a record (Mangan, 2005).

PAGE 38

38 Figure 4-2. Antique map showing parts of Wisconsin and Michigan with unidentified coordinate system and outdated place names (not e CANADA over what is present-day Michigan). From: A Map of Louisiana and of the River Mississippi circa 1710-1720. Source:John L;s Old Maps. The coordinate grid information is also provided in a uniform way. Providing the coordinates randomly would defeat the purpose of identification, and this again helps to reduce the number of errors while allo wing people to read and understand the information in a standard way. The following list is the order in which c oordinates on a map are given in the record: a) westernmost (leftmost ) longitude of the map b) easternmost (rightmos t) longitude of the map c) northernmost (topmost) latitude of the map; and, d) southernmost (bottommo st) latitude of the map. (www.oclc.org ) This order is followed no matter what region is being described anywhere on the planet. As important as the order is, the mathematical expression of the coordinates is also important since the numerical representation will come closer to precision than if expressed linguistically. The bounding box representation works best for pr oviding information on library records, and it is easy to understand despite the need to follow a uniform order. When bounding box coordinates are not available or difficult to determine, or center point coordinates have been

PAGE 39

39 provided or found in an authoritative source, then the center point coordinates can be provided by repeating the latitude and longitude numbers in the above order. Since maps do not always fit a rectangular bounding box shape and can be any sort of polygon shape, they may be identified with a center point coordinate. The centroid, or the poi nt at the geometric center of the polygon, can be used to represent the area. Since every flat map already misrepresents the surface of the earth, one sheet of a map data-set represented digitally, as opposed to th e bounding box in one map sheet, cannot show the true distances, areas, and shapes it represents. Additional coordinate information is provided in two more MARC fields: 342 and 343. The MARC fiel d 342 is specifically created to address the frame of reference for the coordinates in a da ta-set, and not a single map. This field includes enough information so that the user can identif y how location accuracy was affected through the application of a spatial reference method, and then can manipulate the data-set to recover location accuracy. This field also contains the grid coordinate system indicating (ALCTS, 2006). Additionally, the plane-r ectangular coordinate system is what is used, which is based on and mathematically adjusted to a map projection, so that geographic positions can be readily transformed to and from plane coordinates. Additionally, information about the coordinate system developed on a planar surface is incl uded in field 343. This field can include enough information to allow the user of a geospatial data-set to identify the quanti ties of distances, or distances and angles. These distances help define the position of a point on a reference plane onto which the surface of the earth has been projected (ALCTS, 2006). Although strict guidelines need to be followe d regarding placement of coordinates, many maps do not always include the information that is required to provide accurate geographic coordinates on the metadata (Figure 4-3).

PAGE 40

40 Figure 4-3.Examples of maps lacking conventiona l coordinate information. From upper left clockwise: unidentified alphanumeric coordinate system (Attu, Alaska), fantasy/imaginary map (Continent of Arthom), tourist map (Daman, India), and aerial photograph of Key West, Fla. Sources (from upper left clockwise): Attu Homepage, Hiddenway.tripod.com, Resort Graphics International, and Compare Infobase Ltd. In regard to thematic data issues in catalo ging, the textual format is critical in providing what is displayed by completely transcribing what is on the material and also coming as close as possible to correcting mistakes by providing accurate information. It is necessary also to provide a sense of completeness with the information of fered from the material in hand, knowing there is other information missing. While choosing which enumeration standa rd to provide or convert, it

PAGE 41

41 will be necessary to round out the numbers. These issues can range from what degree of propagation of errors from an or iginal source that can be minimized to making a decision of what enumeration and manipulation of data to keep. Comparing Coordinate Representations Center point representation cont ains one latitude line and on e longitude line each that intersect at a single point. It is the standard used within the Geographic Names Information System (GNIS), developed by the U.S. Geological Survey in cooperation with the U.S. Board on Geographic Names (BGN). The GNIS also contai ns information about physical and cultural geographic features in the United States. The database holds federally recognized names of features, and defines the location of the feature, including its geographi c coordinates. It is easy to work with the GNIS to find features on maps, but GNIS is not very good for figuring out the size or shape of a geographic feature or for analytical work that helps describe parts of a larger item, collected works, or sophisticat ed data and--including the list of names of topographic maps. Additionally, GEOnet Names Server (GNS), also from BGN, is the supported database for the standard names of all foreign places, as GNIS is for domestic. The data contain variant spellings with cross-references to help in finding place na mes. The data also continue to add the native spelling of place names (USGS, 2007). There are obvious advantages to adding geograp hic coordinates in a specific library data field for geographic places but problems that still need addressing include uniformity and a universal protocol that include s deciding on what system to use. The decimal form may be supplied instead of degrees, minutes, and seconds of data for sufficient advantages of retrieval and interoperability. Converting the coded form of degrees, minutes and seconds to decimal form and including both systems must weighed for bene fit of ease of use versus the time and labor involved in providing such c onverted or dual information. The Board on Geographic Names

PAGE 42

42 (BGN), a likely and optimal authoritative s ource for these data, provides center point coordinates, as contrasted with bounding box coor dinates typically found in sheet maps, again contributing to the debate of best fit numbe rs in the information allowed by the cataloging rules. It is also important to discuss a temporal problem rega rding coordinates. Should date information be provided due to the likelihood of changes brought to boundaries because of political or natural events? Also, as with most researched work, will the sources of information for these dates be provided with links to trace the origin of the information? While these issues may be resolved later by the bodies which g overn the choices of content of library bibliographic a nd authority records, some issues need to be determined sooner rather than later to keep up with users' needs and their ever-expanding access to information and technology. Enhancing the power of authority reco rds, those separate re cords maintained and linked to various kinds of descri ptive records, is a worthwhile endeavor. The enhancement is to better partner with the problem -solvers who use GIS to addr ess our problems (Lundgren, 2005). According to the 1994 report titled Promoting the National Spatia l Data Infrastructure through Partnerships from the Mapping Science Committee of the National Research Council: The twenty-first century will see geographi c information transported from remote nodes using computer networks to su pport decision making throughout the nation. ... Timely use of these data would be di fficult due to ill-defined format, quality, and accuracy. National or regional decisi on making would be severely impaired because most data sets are not ade quately characterized (NRC website). Retrieval of Materials The idea behind providing coordinates is to de velop a user-friendly way of retrieving maps from a digital database. Additionally, some systems will allow users to specify census tracts, city, county, state regions, area codes, or zip codes as a spatial constraint--all ways of describing something spatially. The retrieval may be done by specifying a geographic name or by selecting a graphic map representation. Furthe rmore, areas defined by geographic coordinates

PAGE 43

43 may be specified or coupled with a geographi c/regional name, usually borrowed from an important adjacent area along with geographic type to serve as a substitu te for regions with no established, known, or authoritative place name. Regardless of what form of spatial query the database uses--geographic name or coordinate, or both--common repres entations of spatial data can be utilized by developing a welldefined uniformity in the description of the material. Providing spatial queries will allow appropriate and consistent treatme nt of the material to help in development of descriptive information for researchers and other informati on seekers while serving as a method to reduce errors in information. The terms geographic or spatial queries imply querying a spatially indexed database based on relationships between particular items in the bibliographic or metadata library index record, such as geographi c subject headings, cla ss numbers or geographic area code within a particular co ordinate. The query can be define d with other relationships, such as intersection, containment, boundary, adjacency, a nd proximity to the area of the relevant map sought (De Floriani, 1993). Providing the latitude and longitude with complete degree, minute, and second information reduces the margin of error and offers the closest approximation to the true measurement of the area on a map being represented. Maps will sometimes either leave out coordinates, or if they do incl ude them, they may provide them using different systems than ones commonly used. The cataloger will have to rely on providing approximations for maps with no coordinate information, and will have to decide wh ether or not a conversion is needed to provide an agreed-upon measurement. The cataloger will also have to consider whet her or not to include information as it appears on the material in addition to converted data (Larson, 1996).

PAGE 44

44 The availability of spatial searching capabilities allows for interoperable services. For instance, Larsgaard (1978) identified four methods of providing geographic coding, or "geocoding" for spatial representation: 1. Using explicit boundary delineations in mathematical form, (stating plane coordinates or latitude and longitude values) 2. Using nominal values that do not in dicate spatial relati onships among entities (place names) 3. Using ordinal values to indicate relative positions of spatial units within some defined system, such as census tracts 4. Using unique designations for undefined or implicitly defined locations, such as zip codes One of the important contributions to geocoding is the benefit to multiple applications. All coordinate-based implementations can be translated to other coordinate-based implementations, albeit with the risk of losing positional accuracy. Although coordinate values can also be translated to place names by arbitraril y or authoritatively assigning names to sets of coordinates, many, if not all, ca rtographic materials, such as ae rial photographs, satellite images, and antique maps, do not have such assigned names. The transportability of the information is from or to different sources or the informati on needs to be consolidated to a same location identified differently by differe nt sources (e.g., USPS, Sanborn, U.S. Census). On the other hand, a daunting task identifies, digitize s and codes all areas identified on a map. So there is a trade-off as to the level of accuracy your information can be (Sears, 2004). Map Services and Mapping Tools This section will attempt to look at the differe nt available databases to provide a variety of ways of searching and providi ng results. This section will also explain how libraries can benefit from the services they provide to improve a librarys online catalog. Google Maps is a service offering powerfu l, user-friendly mapping technology. This technology includes integrated busin ess search results to help fi nd business locations and contact

PAGE 45

45 information. The maps can be clicked and drag ged that allows viewing of adjacent sections. Google Maps also provides a layer of satellite images to view desi red locations in that format. As in other address-oriented onlin e maps, it provides detailed dr iving directions; along with the standard shortcuts and arrow ke y use for panning the map in diffe rent directions and includes zooming and scroll abilities. Another Google se rvice, Google Earth, displays 3-D images and supply coordinates, but it has not made the coor dinates a searchable indexed element to date (Gurnitsky, 2006). The shortcomings ar e very apparent when its limits are realized by way of the number of maps it can produce. Google Earth is neither a warehouse nor a collection of different types of maps as libraries are, and it does not pr ovide a thesaurus or cross-referencing of variant names. The Alexandria Digital Libr ary (ADL) includes datasets of U.S. topographic map quadrangles, and parts of the GNIS data from th e U.S. Geological Survey have been added. The database allows the user to search for place names, which includes both primary names and variant names for the geographic location. To help w ith the establishment of one standard place name from many alternative spellin gs, ADL provides a general way to specify the type of feature in the query. Narrower terms of a selected feature type are in cluded, allowing browsing to find related words; for example, to look for farms in an area, the user can find out that they are given the general type of agricultural features (ADLP, 2004). The Alexandria Digital Library Project ( ADLP) has the advantage of developing a georeferenced digital library th at holds both textual and geos patial resources that provide geospatial description and access for all resources. Coordinates are used to represent the location of features on the surface of the earth. The c overage of maps, aerial photographs, remote-sensing images, and datasets of various kinds and coordina te place referencing have been associated with

PAGE 46

46 resources that have been treated by informa tion management systems whether text-based systems or GIS (Hill & Janee, pp. 1-2). This serv ice provides a single map for location and does not produce the plethora of maps that can be found in a map library collection. An ideal search query is able to integrate a feature type thesaurus in to the search interface for the gazetteer. For querying cartographic material s, they definitely need to be digitized and geocoded. Georeferencing is the process of taking a street address, by way of a point on a map identified by geographic coordi nates, and converting it into de cimal latitude and longitude coordinates so that they can be displayed in a map database. When trying to locate the segment, the following geographic references may all be used : street number, street name, street direction, street type, and the city, state and zip code. The georeferencing is what makes locating addresses and viewing multiple locations on a map instantly possible. The benefits of a gazetteer in clude the use of geographic c oordinates, which can provide the basic structure for named places using map vi sualization software. Georeferencing is the intersection of one line of latitude and one lin e of longitude. As the use of map interfaces increases, more complex georeferencing, such as using two lines of latitude and longitude to form a bounding box and polygons approximating act ual boundaries, is n eeded (Buckland, 2007, p. 381). A georeferencing calculator (Figure 4-4) is a to ol to aid in the refere ncing of localities of digitized items, such as maps that are found in a library, museum, or similar collections. Displaying the position of a site geographically can help detect e rrors and increase data quality. The GIS tools contain analytical functions wh ich make possible the prediction of spatial distributions (Wieczorek, 2004, p. 764).

PAGE 47

47 Figure 4-4. Sample of a georefer encing calculator for UF Librarie s Search for Los Angeles. ArcGIS contains a tool that allows geogra phic interfaces to biblio graphic citations and library records offering graphic alternatives to searching text strings of place names. The ArcView's hotlink tool permits linking to external data utilizing a point for each of the place names created from the associated latitude and longitude fields. Using this functionality, the user can look at a map, click on a point in an area, and retrieve releva nt bibliographic records in a new window. The same type of Universal Resource Locator (URL) search can be created for any library catalog or database that is capable of linking to remotely generated URLs (Wright & Urban, 1996). Database Discussion Maps are an integral part of data researchers need fo r emphasizing the relationships between place, time, and subject in the study of culture, environment, ar chitecture, engineering,

PAGE 48

48 and history. In an effort to enha nce map retrieval with better t ools and standard practices by way of digitization, software must be developed and manipulated to allow downloading and editing of geo-temporal data to manipulate the representati on as well as editing the data if needed. This interface will be improved by the availability of shared data acce ssible through map-based interfaces, standards for gazetteer s and time period databases, continuous research, studies to develop and improve geographic aspects in online catalogs, and good practice guidelines for preparing paper and electroni c publications (Buckland, 2004). In order to display information in geogr aphic tool software, map data must be georeferenced. To create base maps and contri bute additional map laye rs, the map data must routinely include data with latitude and longitude attributes, along with the use of place names collected in the course of resear ch on historical texts or actual material in hand. The Alexandria Digital Library (ADL) is one powerful player on the authoritative level of selecting place names for this kind of work (Hill and Zheng, 1999). Rega rding thematic concerns even the flexibility of converting coordinate information and despite the ideal of uniform data, the information will be dependent on the researcher carrying out th e queries and having an understanding of the database that provides the necessary information. Geographical Searching in Library Catalogs Library catalogs have been designed, or ar e best known, for search ing by author, by title, and by subject, but they are in the process of developing their spatia l searching capabilities through the application of GIS a nd providing additional numerical da ta. The user can search for place names in titles, keywords, or in subject headings, but geographica l headings tend to be political jurisdictions or of an administrative nature. These names tend to depend on current use and can be burdensome for hist orical or political changes.

PAGE 49

49 Geographic coordinates, however, along with the place name feature, are effective in selecting different places with the same name an d associating different names for the same place. The idea that GIS will allow data with coordinates to be visualized as map layers in a common coordinate system conversion from other sta ndards. Multiple map layers, showing other divisions by topic, among them history and topog raphy, for example, will be superimposed in a single viewing environment. Coordinates for pl ace names in subject headings will allow for retrieving maps by clicking on a referenced dot. Additionally, geographical coordinates will be calculated in the form of nearby searches by perhaps defining a radius around a center point making this useful for border and frontier studies along with studies of near neighbor effects. With t odays technology, the linking of online library catalogs with onl ine gazetteers alone could tran sform geographical information searching throughout the libraries an d the Internet (Buckland, 2004). Searching a geographically indexe d database assumes that the s earcher is able to specify what he seeks. Furthermore, the searcher will be able to input the information in some type of query language or provide coordinates in some wa y, but not necessarily in some standard query formulation. Pointing at interactiv e maps can give the desired result s of the coordinates, and they can be used to formulate the search by providi ng that information to the spatial query (Larson, 1995, p. 91). The University of Florida library catalog can include a link to a different window that will allow the user to search by bounding box or cen ter point coordinates (F igures 4-5 and 4-6). The researchers using the library catalog would be able to search th e database by entering coordinate information.

PAGE 50

50 Figure 4-5. Sample screen accomm odating link to expand search to geographic coordinates. Figure 4-6. Sample screens accommodating geographi c coordinate searches for points and for bounding box (Qinchai Province, China).

PAGE 51

51 CHAPTER 5 CATALOGING ISSUES IN PROVIDING GEOGRAPHIC COORDINATES Addressing Boundary and Accuracy Issues This work concentrates on the problem of providing cartographic information, and, more specifically, coordinate system information, for the cartographic material being described. The map cataloger is used to providing all kinds of spatial information to describe maps: scale, projection, source, and place names. Other non-spatial information is also included: title, author, subject (non-geographic) terms, type, edition, an d situation date. All thes e descriptions provide many of the elements necessary for the needs of spatial resource users, and they do so in a variety of approaches and interpre tations under a uniform standard. Additionally, boundaries are line s determining the limits of an area and can have many meanings, usually depending on what function they serve along with the perceptions of those who live in their proximity. Bounda ries are authenticated or le galized by being depicted in documents or on lines drawn on maps or on land or sea through the placement of markers or checkpoints. Disputes regardi ng boundaries come about from broken treaties. From differing map representations likely from overlapping terr itorial claims, and from heavily concentrated militarized areas along disputed borders. The re sulting spatial changes from boundary conflicts are linked to broader processes affecting divided countries and from people not necessarily wanting to be divided (Wood, 2000). This, in turn, affects search retrieval border, geographic line identification, and labeling in maps, while both cataloging speci alists and rese archers try to avoid taking a political stance or attempt to remain neutral in definition (Figure 5-1). Boundaries also tend to symbolize the chaoti c, frustrating and so metime warring tension among groups with hopes for self-determination a nd internationally recogn ized sovereignty. The value of a legally recognized bounda ry can be beneficial for the people affected by its parameters

PAGE 52

52 whether the value may have been placed through historical events or other functions that led to national identification (Wood, 2000). An effort must be made by both librarian and researcher to identify the geographic coordina tes of the disputed area for searching and re trieving said materials. Figure 5-1. Sample of a borde r dispute of Kashmir region. Source:GNU Free Documentation License. The ability to understand geographic coordinate s is critical to map reading. As the grid reference remains significant to print maps for locating places, coordinates will continue being useful in the digitized realm a nd available as long as the Inte rnet is available (Wiegard, 2006, p. 36). However, many of the spatial metadata el ements are retrieved in manners unique to individual systems. Therefore, limitations must be noted to providing coordinate information both from within the cartographi c item and via established librar y standards. Also it must be noted that additional limitations exist once the information is provided.

PAGE 53

53 The spatial coverage of a cartographic source shares attributes w ith other information sources, such as books and journals and sharing title and subject terms. Cartographic materials will differ from these other formats that usually come in the shape of a rectangle, and they may contain coordinates to id entify the rectangles corners. Most, if not all, text-based information systems have not used geographic codes for retrie ving materials. Many map collections still rely on the knowledge of their librarians to help patr ons find what they are looking for. A demand exists for a new powerful spatial information s earching tool for improvi ng the efficiency and effectiveness of searching geographi cally referenced materials (Yu, 1999). This digital age has made cartography and ge ographic information more integrated than ever before, making spatial information more critical for representing traditional cartographic manifestations. Librarians must be able not only to provide data which traditionally represented cartographic documents, but now provide accompa nying metadata from such sources that may contain any sense of locality (Smits, 1999, p. 304). Ideally, providing geographic coordinate in formation depends on the availability and completeness of the metadata provided and also the discretion of the cataloger following policies in place. Libraries are on the cusp of not n eeding to provide long bib liographic records with publisher information, but must otherwise provide me tadata that can be loaded and converted to a database for indexing purposes (Welch & William s, 1999, p. 353). But users fail to see that the metadata has to originate somewhere and that standards must be adhered to. Accuracy of data is important for mainta ining uniformity and easy communication and transportability/exportation of information. The following factors can all be considered as a means of reducing errors and increasing accuracy when creating bibliographic information:

PAGE 54

54 a. Documentation of the data by way of cataloging (documenting bibliographic information of libra ry materials helps preserve data, that is, that datas legacy and longevity for future use) b. Viable transfer of data and the datas documentation through metadata (metadata is used for improving document retrie val, as well as s upporting and transferring data information from one collection to another) c. Agreed-upon symbols and numbers for presentation (using the same kind of symbols and punctuati on reduces interpretati on of existing symbols and eliminates duplication of sym bols to mean other definitions) d. What elements of content will be presented? (agreed-to elements help save time by work ing with already established terms and help with communicating in said terminology) e. Which format(s) it will be distributed in (materials in the library may include many t ypes of materials; primary sources may also later be reproduced in another format whether book, photograph, map, atlas, compact disc, or microform) f. Intent behind the creators map (visual approach: map for instru ction or for highlighting statis tical information or for recreating an event--all may help identify subject identification) g. Consideration for international bodies and open sources (material copyright or licensing issu es versus equal access to all) h. The dominating approach behind laissez-fa ire industries driving the preferred or monopolized use of metadata standards (legal issues tied to duplicati on of material or effort to reproduce material in different formats) Standards are for facilitating the development, sharing, and use of, in this case, spatial data. Agencies, such as the U.S. Federa l Geographic Data Committee (FGDC), develop standards for implementation, and sharing and use of sp atial data on a nationa l level. The FGDC does this in consultation and coope ration with state, local, and tribal governments, the private sector and academic community, and, to the ex tent feasible, the in ternational community. Standards and uniformity contribute to comm on or agreed-upon ways of cataloging and supplying spatial information to bibliographic records and metadata. As such, data built to standards are more valuable since they are more easily shared, again, through the use of metadata.

PAGE 55

55 Cartographic materials, including maps, atla ses, and satellite images, are cataloged according to the latest national standards for de scriptive content and punctuation. These national standards are included, as previously mentioned, in the latest revision of AACR Second Edition, Second Revision, and Cartographic Materials: A Manual of Interpretation for AACR2 2002 Revision (2003). Local standards an d variations to more specific rules are also taken into consideration, usually applied to special projects or formats and recorded online for the benefit of the department staff and to maintain uniformity and accuracy. These standards call for taking the informa tion from the map or source itself or the principal sheet for a set of maps. If finding the source fails, the searcher may use the container or other accompanying material, in th at order, as the source of in formation. Important information that is used in the description of a map includes: title(s), autho r(s), geographic subject headings (place names) represented on the map, date(s), p hysical description, scale, projection, type of relief, and geographic coordinates. Geographic coordinates are useful and importa nt in their ability to precisely specify positions on the earth's surface. Their uses incl ude comparing positions, calculating distances, and, in general, assistance in navigati ng from one point or place to another. Cataloging work and the creation of metadata is detail-oriented. The following factors must be taken into account in order to reduce the number of errors as much as possible: a. Exactness of measurement or description of material in hand b. Degree of correspondence between the data and the real world c. Authoritative control of the input data d. Reliable sources for the data and the proces sing steps it takes to carry out the work e. Degree to which the data represent the world at the present moment Accuracy, or completeness, can be measured by the discrepancy between the encoded and the actual value of an attribute or by the number or lack of errors In turn, this completeness can

PAGE 56

56 include precision which can be de scribed as the degree of detail th at can be displayed in time, space, or topic as subject entrie s, and includes maintaining a cons istency which is the absence of contradictory information in said database. Among the quality issues mentioned regarding cataloging cartographic materials, the follo wing issues have to be confronted: a. Spatial precision when pr oviding the actual coordinates b. Accurate measurement of materials c. Not providing coordinates (o r working with missing data) d. Consulting current source data fo r carrying out updated revisions While simultaneously providing local interpretati ons to procedural rules, which, in turn are susceptible to such erro rs in human definitions as: a. Uncertainty of measurements b. Not following up on discrepancies c. Prioritizing or deciding what information to leave in or out d. Converting data to intern ationally accepted standards or other local standards Accurate information is vital for effective re sults in the information-providing world. The information will be relied on by individuals, researchers, and even government agencies. Accuracy is an essential component in the de cision-making process in producing the most accountable information. Bad decisions contribut e to the absence of reliable, accurate information, and increase the ch ances of producing a product that will impair or flaw the scientific process. Data are susceptible to human inaccuracy and conditional to what gets measured and what gets ignored. Advances in technology, as in the digitization of materials, are incr easing the range of what can be measured. Since li brary science has been involved in the business of providing information, librarians--specifically cataloge rs--find themselves in creasingly involved in providing more information. The human factor in the increase of providing information makes

PAGE 57

57 users susceptible to more inaccurate information. So standards must be constantly reviewed to decrease errors or at least keep to a minimum the number of errors. Metadata Language Use Libraries rely on the MARC (MAchine Readab le Cataloging) format, which has been criticized for some shortcomings relevant to di gital spatial data. In reality, no other metadata scheme is so carefully reviewed, revised, ame nded, and so universally in place as is the MARC format for library materials. Ercegovac and Bork o argue that use of the MARC format "requires catalogers memorization of a larg e number of rules, which cha nge frequently" (1992, p. 267 as quoted in Franks 1994, p. 13) Additionally, MARC contains many variants and interpretations among different interest groups a nd committees that have led to a few problems in exchanging bibliographic data (Frank, 1994, p. 23). While the MARC record format contains fields that identify spatial data, including map scale, pr ojection, or map bounding coor dinates, the use of such fields is inconsistent. Some of the info rmation that can be provided is optional for the cataloger to provide. Additionally, the Federal Geographic Data Committee (FGDC) initia ted work in 1992 via a forum on geographical metadata standards. It s objectives are to pr ovide a common set of terminology and definitions for the documentati on of digital geospatial data. The standard establishes the names of data elements and groups of data elements. By Executive Order 12906, Coordinating Geographic Data Acquisition and Access: The National Spatial Data Infrastructure was signed in 1994 by President Clint on. The FGDC invites and encourages organizations, government agencies, and pers ons to use the standard when documenting geospatial data (FGDC, 1994). Few spatial data representations are more basic than the bounding box: a rectangle surrounding a geographic feature or dataset. Bounding boxes are ke y components of geospatial

PAGE 58

58 metadata, especially if the information is supplied. Despite their common use, bounding boxes are more complicated than they first appear. Bo unding boxes are one of a number of methods for describing the extent of a map dataset. The boun ding box is supposed to represent "the limits of coverage of a data set," but the meaning of limits is not clearly specified in the Content Standard for Digital Geospatial Metadata. The phrase that spatial is special applies to this humble representation (Caldwell, 2005). A continual cooperative effort has been made among the national, stat e, and local library communities and organizations to identify, addre ss, and solve these problems. Currently, many bibliographic databases, wh ich use MARC formatted data, limit users to searching for information based on the spatial metadata s upplied. Despite some apparent shortcomings, MARC continues to be the primary choice for in tegrating bibliographic data in the library community due to its versatility and well-established nature, that is, it is true and tested (Frank, 1994, p. 90). The MARC's geographical searching limitations include restricting the search parameters to a particular location in space. The searching is done by specifying a place name or by applying geographic coordinates, if supplie d by the cataloger or already available on the record. Place names can be ambiguous, having different meani ngs among different users (e.g., Las Malvinas v. Falkland Islands), and can suffer from variations in spelling (e.g., Colombia v. Columbia). Place names are commonly used as a retrieval key in most bibliographic syst ems (Hill et al., 2000). However, this work is about providing and es tablishing uniformity in coordinate systems. For a map, one of the most common methods of describing spatial constraints is to specify a center point location and search radius, or, preferab ly, to specify diagonal corner locations of a minimum bounding rectangle or box or also to specify the locations of vertices of

PAGE 59

59 a polygon within which the searcher would expect the data to exist. Au thoritative database systems, such as the Alexandria Digital Librar y, U.S. Gazetteer (U.S. Census Bureau), GNS, and GNIS, offer one or more of these geometric constr aint methods to users. Other spatial constraint methods currently used to specify a satellite pa th and frame number for remotely sensed imagery or specify a tile of a hierarchical order (Frank, 1994, p. 90). The thematic data issues for using and provi ding metadata include a constant awareness and knowledge of current data. Data needing revisions and updating pose a challenge with missing data in regard to compensati ng or noting the absence of the data.

PAGE 60

60 CHAPTER 6 SUMMARY AND CONCLUSION From the findings, library staff needs to wo rk toward a common goal of seeking how to use information technology to s upport policy, facilitate lib rary use, and make learning interesting for students and researchers desiri ng to use the library as their pr imary resource of information. To complement, or rather keep pace with, the increased Internet use a nd meet users demands while lessening existing anxieties or apprehensions, library sta ff may also have to encourage users to take the plunge and walk into a library. Educational technology coupled with information science can be used to enhance teaching and develop methods to increase patron library use. This work is written to provide an unders tanding of the work th at is involved in cataloging and providing metadata for cartographic materials and th e factors that contribute to thematic errors. To demonstrate what is invo lved in cataloging maps it is necessary to understand the need for providing spatial data as the basis for geographic information retrieval. This work concentrated on one aspect of spatia l data: geographic coordinates. The ideal is to provide coordinate information for the purpose of facilitating document retrieval while concurrently encountering, resolv ing, or minimizing any of th e following problems: accuracy, consistency, conversion, and unavailable data. The development and use of spatial inform ation and metadata cataloging patterns have depended on and grown along with the advances in information technology--with what computer memory has allowed. The recent library inform ation shift has created a crisis in the establishment of standards to keep up with the changes. These information developments in turn affect the information that is input at the local level at the University Library. The AACR2 rules have given way to a much delayed introduction to new standards: Resource Description and

PAGE 61

61 Access (RDA) to tackle the new challenges in describing digital resources in the new Information Age (JSC, 2005). However, it may be a long time before the number of solutions can be reduced or before a single solution can be found or agreed upon in regard to providing spatial information to library records, and ma ybe even longer when fi nally applied at the University of Florida Libraries. Despite these minor setbacks, library science will continue to have a workable information infrastructure us ing the latest methods and sources for providing and locating spatial resources. Despite some aforementioned unresolved issu es, including competing online geographic gazetteers and a shortage of new standards to keep up with technology, catalogers can forge ahead knowing that applying the practices mentione d in this work will be one way to confront the problems and reduce errors. The ideal query s ituation includes being able to search most, if not all, maps in a library collection by way of geographic coordinates, and thus find every map that can be pinpointed within that coordinate range. The map collection database at the library must be able to go beyond the service of gazetteers and provide many layers of maps in an instant. It must be understood that providing coordinates cannot be a panacea. But the coordina tes must work in conjunction with place names and feature topic names and probably beyond to a subject/topic thesau rus and hierarchical relational data, that is, planet, hemisphere, co ntinent, country, primary level administration, secondary level administration, city, ne ighborhood, among other geographic regions. It is hoped that identifying the hurdles here, as well as those that information providers and researchers will encounter along the way as th ey are put into practice, will make it easier in the near future to keep up with the fast-pac ed changes in information technology. Librarians must not be frustrated by the number of problem s to be overcome, but instead be resilient and

PAGE 62

62 progressive in thinking to move forward with this technology. Through cooperative efforts at every level, it is important to make the necessa ry and, in some cases, overdue adjustments in standards, procedures, catalo ging rules, and information retrieval services among the contributing and authoritative parties. These effo rts will be for the benefit of all those needing access to this information. One positiveor perhaps negative--aspect to consider about information technology may be that the user can never consider the work finished because it becomes more a set of interdependent information. Thus layers upon laye rs of information will be a fit in different sources, and these layers of information will need to be constantly updated and revised, as well as the metadata infrastructure. At the same time, the advent of the Internet, its resource use, and contribution have expanded beyond all expectations The Internet is having a significant impact on research work, thus making for a need to have an inventory of information and consequently common standards. The librarians response to the spread of info rmation, of course, is not free of challenges which include a lack of familia rity with the technology, and the need to develop appropriate content for the databases for both defining standa rds and gathering information while making the data suitable for comparative work. The information science fields, whether library information science or geographic information science, will be expanding their use more and more, as in recent years. Geographers must again be the cr eators and users of the software programming and application that will deal with the matter of spa tial data. Teachers and li brarians will take on the responsibility of teaching future students and re searchers the new skills necessary in conjunction with the direction that information science is taking.

PAGE 63

63 Furthermore, digitized spatial data see no end in sight because an unw ritten directive to is to digitize every bit of information available, co upled with coming up with more and more layers of information to integrate to the existing digi tized information. Once a spatial data object has been created or needs to be classified, it will also need to be consta ntly updated and edited, depending on the editing of the material or caterin g to the patrons needs or requests. Catalogers-whether digital or map librarians, or bette r yet, maybe geographers--will become the GIS managers occupied with developing, creating, ed iting, and validating inputs and standards for spatial data. One uncertainty is how great the growth of databases will relate to the digital spatial objects. Another uncertainty is how far libr arians, geographers, and researchers can go discovering new data and text mining processes. Today, information technology provides a possible new application for modem geography. Henry Tom (1994), the GIS director for Oracle Cor poration working on metadata standards, stated that these GIS standards offer an unprecedented means for the GIS world to interact on an equal and mutually beneficial basis with the world of information technology standards. The University of Florida Librar ies can benefit from more geography and GIS professionals. But it is important that geogr aphy will create an agenda that includes the appropriate curricula to establish what will serv e as a base for uniform spatial information and library information standards for manipulating, cl assifying, and retrieving spatial information. Such an infrastructure serves not only as a st andards forum, but it also establishes a community of concern and ownership in deve loping specifications to resolve spatial issues common to all. For a successful collaboration, library digitization a nd cataloging issues must also be resolved. Challenges include recognizing how spatial data from digitized materials can be formulated into the integration of spatial analysis in both the curricula of social scientists and

PAGE 64

64 information retrieval and access. Geographical info rmation science has traditionally been within the realm of geography departments, but in a number of places GIS programs and degrees are offered in a multidisciplinary and interdisciplinary environment outside the traditional departmental boundaries; the question remains whether a restructured GIS approach in geography will claim this terrain or if this constitutes a threat to its traditional role. These issues will require considerable debate; they seem far fr om resolved at this point. In addition to the matter of who will provide the education, much work remains to be done to integrate even basic notions of spatial analysis into main stream social science curricula. An underlying theme of this work is that space does matter, although this may not be immediately evident in the social sciences. An important challenge to the spatial analysis community consists of demonstrating in clear terms that much is to be gained from the discipline of geography by a careful and explicit approach th at incorporates spatial elements in social science research. Many developments in new technology and info rmation sciences form the foundation for a growing importance of spatial analysis. This is an exciting frontier and it probably brings significant gains in the technical skills, theore tical skills, and knowledge associated with geographic information science. In order to acco mplish some significant advance, data analysis and computation will continue to be necessary. In addition, these advances are likely to continue in interdisciplinary environment where traditio nal boundaries are brought down. It is a challenge to the geography and information science communiti es to seize this opportunity and provide the means to develop spatially integrated programs. Information retrieval based on geographic inform ation is just beginning to take a foothold in information research; therefore little research has been done to evaluate the effectiveness of

PAGE 65

65 searching by coordinates. For now, place name queries are sensitive to language and grammar issues, and a name is not available for ever y place on the planet. The idea for the use of coordinates is that every place can be identi fied by geographic coordinates (Hill, 2006). Robin Kearns (2001, p. 306), from the Univ ersity of Auckland, New Zealand, summed up what is being communicated in this work: At the start of a new century of geogr aphic endeavour, it behoves us to take seriously what the public thinks of our worl d, and thinks of us as interpreters of it for much of our teaching and research is shaped by trends in society at large and the spirit of our age. While shaped, we should also be shapers and contest the processes that might otherw ise be constructed as inev itable. Ironically perhaps, geography become history to the extent that we restore the story of geography and broader perspectives on people and place to our cu rriculum .... We need to endorse the primacy of place experien ce and recognise the university and community as mutually interdependent si tes of geographical education. While we might doubt our abilities to change the worl d at large, if we critically influence the worlds of others, they, in turn an d in time, may positively change ours. The future of the University of Florida Libraries will depend on library science and geography. Both geographic needs and library informations needs for providing academic research will only grow and become an increasin g part of our information consciousness. It is necessary to become more familiar and skilled w ith the technology and be more spatial-literate. Establishing standards continues to be important, especially sta ndards for metadata. The ability to use the Internet and GIS continues to grow not just for the ability to access static information, but also the ability to interact with and manipulate the data online. And librarians must work with geographers to take on more managerial ro les in the design and provision of GIS services, leaving the technical aspects, ideally to specially trained geographers. This work by no means needs to be the end but rather the beginning of a larger project. Spatial information can be found in many other sources besides cartographic materials. When looking at documents concerning agriculture, census informa tion, biology, ecology, archeology,

PAGE 66

66 and geology, all of these among others are concer ned with a particular location on the planet, maybe even the universe--including astronomy. In traditional library catalogs, materials are mainly accessed by subject matter or call number, but not always by geographical data (Smits, 2000). Cartographic materials must use the unique mathematical properties they provide in a time where this information is readily available and becoming more prominent, and they must consequently integrate or develop geographic information browsers that can perform the functions to carry out coordinate searches. This work has demonstrated a need to addre ss the changes occurring at the University of Florida Libraries in regard to information technology, especially th e way cataloging methods affect metadata production. University librarian s and geographers must embrace the changes in information sciences and work together to impr ove the way spatially referenced information can help with the dissemination of information and im prove access to research materials that will be available not only to researcher s but of everyone else. The appa rent instantaneous changes, which occur with the availability of immediat e documentation results on the Internet, must not discourage information keepers (librarians) or information seekers from working together to create better methods for stori ng and retrieving information. Libr arians, who have the rules and the standards in place, and geographers, who have the tools (GIS) at their disposal, must make themselves available and make others aware that th ey have the potential to create a system that will clarify the muckiness of unrelated results from endlessly wading through full-text searches on the Internet.

PAGE 67

67 APPENDIX A SURVEY WORK AND ANALYSIS The survey administered hopes to convey th e researchers dependence on geospatial information. The survey was distributed to grad uate students in geography, placed in the map library, and handed out in an urba n planning GIS class. It is hoped the survey can help provide feedback and eventually be used to improve search capabilities for cartographic materials, and also help find additional materials in a more efficient manner. The University of Florida Libraries may determine which books, magazines, videos, CDs, and maps they acquire, but are they looking at what researcher s need? Should the University Libr aries be developing a role with patrons to adequately provide queried informati on? Library services have tended to ignore the traditional needs of the patrons. A study conducted by Gluck (1996) showed a need for geospatial information, To connect with others and to imagine and dream. All geospatial information is not as ideological ly or practically based as our current library services and produc ts seem to dictate. People use the current products and services but modify them for their needs. We should be sensitive to thos e transformations and provide support for them. From the survey (Appendices B and C for surv ey sheet and complete results) carried out April to May 2007, it was revealed that more than 70% of geography-relate d researchers at the University of Florida relied more on the Inte rnet and other sources compared to using the physical library (~25%) to research and retrieve materials of a cartographic nature. Whatever independent or across-the-board rece nt trends or what other subject or library branch experiences may be, the numbers seem to reflect a higher dependence on the non-physi cal library resources than on the actual physical buildings where pr ofessional help is readily available. The survey also shows that re searchers at the Univ ersity of Florida l ook for all types of cartographic materials when searching the li brary database: census data, demographic information, digitized data, GIS materials, stat istical documents, aerial photographs, satellite images, atlases, and other items such as CDs and DVDs containing maps and cartographic information (Figure A-1). But almost half of t hose surveyed could not answer if they were finding an adequate amount of materials of cart ographic nature; the remaining half was split almost evenly between yes and no. A majority of those surveyed also resp onded that they did not find an adequate amount of materials of a geographic nature in the libraries. Those surveyed also expressed from a supplie d list that a library listing of geographic materials can be improved by having more ge ographic headings and more geographic notes, acquiring more print maps, increasing access to staff, improving geographic literacy, and having more coordinates information. About 25% of thos e who responded to the question on whether or not they rely on latitude/longit ude to help retrieve cartogra phic materials answered yes. Furthermore, when asked if coordinates or place names would be thei r preferred searching method for maps, the majority with a preference chose both coordinates and place names as their answer instead of opting for just one.

PAGE 68

68 Users' interests in a variety of formats as a percentage Census data demographic information digitized data GIS materials Statistical documents aerial photos satellite images other (atlas, cd's, etc Figure A-1. Users interest in a va riety of formats as a percentage A strong number of those surveyed also want ed to reinforce their search queries with both place names and coordinate information. Gi ven an opportunity to express other problems that they encounter when sear ching the library database, some recommended more indexing of topographic maps, creating links to the Florid a Geographic Data Library (FGDL), which is maintained at the University of Florida's Ge oPlan Center, plus a GI S Research and Teaching Facility that is the mechanism for distributing satellite imager y, aerial photographs, and spatial (GIS) data throughout the st ate of Florida (FGDL.org). Clearly the results largely reflect graduate st udent participation and needs. A significant amount of inclination is shown toward digital form at rather than paper materials, which probably reflects what most people are looking for thes e days. So an electronic search by geographic coordinates or bounding boxes is in deed a logical idea. Unfortunately, faculty and researchers were not as emphasized, and more information w ould have been useful from other departments (i.e., forestry, archeology, anthr opology, and other users of GIS).

PAGE 69

69 APPENDIX B SURVEY RESULTS (Question 1) Are you? Category CountPercentage Undergrad1 2% Graduate 35 85% Faculty 3 7% Staff 0 Visitor 2 5% Other 0 N=41 (Question 2) While searching the library catalog do you look for (and find or use) any of the following information or formats of publication? Category CountPercentage Census data 9 10% Demographic information 6 7% Digitized data 13 14% GIS materials 16 17% Statistical documents 6 7% Aerial photos 18 20% Satellite images 14 15% Other (Atlas, CD's, etc.) 10 11% N=92 (Question 3) Do you find an adequate amount of materials of a geographical nature in the library database? Category CountPercentage Yes 11 27% No 10 24% Unsure 20 49% N=41

PAGE 70

70 (Question 5) How do you thin k library listing (cataloging, or description) of geographic materials can be improved to assure you have done a thorough search of the library catalog to satisfy your needs or requirements or, what can be done to help you get the most out of your search? Providing: Category Count Percentage More geographic headings 8 22% More geographic notes 7 20% More coordinates (lat/long) info. 3 7% Acquiring more print maps 6 15% Increasing access to staff 2 5% Improving geographic literacy 8 22% Other_________________* 5 2% N=39 Other responses (5): Create links to FGDL I haven't really noticed Upload more map images to Internet Digitized maps Not sure unfamiliar with system (Question 7) Would you prefer searching latitude/longitude or geographic placenames to find maps? Or both? Category CountPercentage Latitude/longitude2 6% Place names 14 42% Both 17 52% N=33 Question 6 Do you find an adequate amount of materials of a geographical nature in the library database? Category CountPercentage Yes 9 26% No 26 74% N=35

PAGE 71

71 (Question 8) What other problems do you generally or specifically encounter when searching the library database for geographic/cartographic materials? Have not visited Need more helpers Metadata not available before downloading files Lack of experience with the process Not adequate materials Don't use the library I do not use the library databases. Maybe wh at is suitable be more widely publicized I use the Internet, not the library catalog Keyword searches are pathetic. It is ve ry difficult to find materials. Mostly perform regional searches so place names work just fine Lack of certain aerial photographic series Not knowing where to look or search for information Should have indexes (online) for togographic sets with just a single record/call number I'm new, I haven't started to do this too much yet I used only once the Map Library Shortage of data Slow response from server, hard to find some images for different years Printing/scanning maps Never really used it, ashamed to say. I always go to FDGL for .shps and other info on Florida, but my study region is FL. It's hard to navigate the whole UF catalog system anyways I work the GeoPlan Center and get most of my data from there or Labins? Map Library is great!

PAGE 72

72 APPENDIX C SAMPLE SURVEY SHEET UF Library catalog GEOGRA PHIC searches survey: To: ALL Library patrons specifically researchers using geographical references From: Jorge A. Gonzalez, Senior Archivist, Smathers Libraries, University of Florida This survey is to help find problem areas in searching cartographic library materials for academic research. UF library patrons are involved in study or research that requires use of the library catalog and access to materials of a geographic nature. Your answer to the following survey questions will help identify problems that come up while search ing the library catalog. Please be aware you do not have to answ er any question you wish not to answer. This survey will take about 2-3 minutes to answer. No payment is offered but your participation is appr eciated. There are no risks to you for participating in this study. Your iden tity will remain anonymous. There are no immediate benefits to th e participant, but it is hoped that this survey will help future libr ary users make better searches of a geographic nature or subject. No one under the age of 18 may participate in this program. *** For questions about your rights as a research participant, contact the IRB office at 392-0433 or irb2@ufl.edu *** *** Please circle all choices in bold that apply *** 1. Are you? Undergrad Graduate Faculty Staff Visitor Other 2. While searching the library catalog do you look for (and find or use) any of the following information or formats of publication? --Census data --Demographic information --Digitized data --GIS materials --Statistical documents --Aerial photos --Satellite images --Other (Atlas, CDs, etc.) 3. Do you find an adequate amount of materials of a geographical nature in the library database? Yes No Unsure 4. Which of the following is your preferred location for searching said materials? -Main branch -Other branch -Map Library -From Home -From Internet -Elsewhere: _______ 5. How do you think library listing (cataloging, or description) of geographic materials can be improved to assure you have done a thorough search of the library catalog to satisfy your needs or requirements or, what can be done to help you get the most out of your search? Providing: -More geographic headings -More geographic not es -More coordinates (lat/long) info.

PAGE 73

73 -Acquiring more print maps -Increasing access to staff -Improving geographic literacy -Other: ______________________________________ 6. Do you rely on latitude/longitude to help you retrieve cartographic materials? Yes No 7. Would you prefer searching latitude/longitude or geographic placenames to find maps? Or both 8. What other problems do you generally or spec ifically encounter when searching the library database for geographic/cartographic materials? ____________________________________________________________________________

PAGE 74

74 LIST OF REFERENCES Alexandria Digital Library Project. 2004 Guide to the ADL Gazetteer Content Standard, version 3.2 (2. Overview). Retrieved Fall 2006, from http://www.alexandria.ucsb.edu/gaze tteer/ContentStanda rd/version3.2/GCS3.2guide.htm [American Library Association]. 1998. Anglo-American cataloguing rules prepared under the direction of the Joint Steering Co mmittee for Revision of AACR, Michael Gorman and Paul W. Winkler, eds. Ch icago: American Library Association. Andrew, Paige. 2003. Cataloging sheet map, the basics. New York: Haworth Information Press. Association for Library Collecti ons & Technical Services. 2006. Cataloging and Description of Cartographic Resources: from parchment to pixels, paper to digital, GIS cataloging (June 23, 2006, ALA Annual Conference), New Orleans, LA, Larsgaard, Mary, presenter. Association of College & Research Libraries. 2006. Standards for Libraries in Higher Education Approved by the ACRL Board of Directors. Retrieved Summer 2007 from http://www.ala.org/ala/acrl/acrls tandards/standardslibraries.cfm Attu Homepage. 2007. Map of Attu, Alaska from http://hlswilliwaw.com/aleutians/attu-homepage.htm Borgman, C.L., Leazer, G.H., Gilliland-Swe tland, A., Millwood, K., Champeny, L., Finley, J., Smart, L.J. 2004. How Geography Professors Select Materials for Classroom Lectures: Implications fo r the Design of Digital Libraries from Proceedings of the 2004 Joint ACM/IEEE Conference on Digital Libraries. pp 179-185. Borgman, Christine L. 1996. Why are onlin e catalogs still hard to use?, Journal of the American Society for Information Science 47, no. 7: 493-503. Bowen, Jennifer. 2005. Report on the JSC meeting, Chicago, April 24, 2005 retrieved Summer 2006 from http://www.libraries.psu.edu /tas/jca/ccda /docs/jsc0506.pdf Boxall, James. 2003. "Geolibraries: Geographe rs, librarians and sp atial collaboration," The Canadian Geographer 47, no.1:18-27. Boxall, James. 2002. Geolibraries, th e global spatial data infrastruc ture and digital Earth: a time for map librarians to re flect upon the moonshot, INSPEL 36:1

PAGE 75

75 Buckland, Michael and Lancaster, L. 2004. Combining place, time, and topic: the Electronic Cultural Atlas Initiative. D-Lib Magazine. 10, no. 5, from http://www.dlib.org/dlib/m ay04/buckland/05buckland.html Buckland, Michael, et al. 2007. "Geographic Sear ch: Catalogs, Gazetteers, and Maps," in College & Research Libraries 68, no. 5:376-387. Cai, Guoray. 2001. GeoVIBE: A Visual Interface to Geographic Digital Library from 2001 ACM-IEEE JCDI, Workshop on Visual Interfaces. Caldwell, Douglas R. 2005. Unlocking the mysteries of the bounding box, Coordinates: Online Journal of the Map and Geography Round Table, American Library Association (by MAGERT). Series A. no. 2, Retrieved Fall 2006 from http://www.sunysb.edu/libmap/c oordinates/seriesa/no2/a2.htm Compare Infobase Limited. 2007. Tourist map of Daman from http://www.mapsofworld.com/ De Floriani, L.; Marzano, P.; & Puppo, E. 1993. Spatial queries and data models, in A. Spatial information theory: A theoretical basis for GIS Berlin: Springer-Verlag. Dillon, Martin & Jul, Erik. 1996. Cataloging Internet Res ources: the convergence of libraries, in Cataloging & Classification Quarterly. 22, no. 3/4:197-238. Ercegovac, Zorona, and Harold Borko. 1992. Performance Evaluation of Mapper, in Information Processing & Management. 28.2: 259-268. Federal Geographic Data Committee. 1994. C ontent standards for digital spatial metadata (Overview), Federal Geogra phic Data Committee. Washington, D.C. http://geology.usgs.gov/tools/me tadata/standard/overview.html Frank, Steven M. 1994. Cataloging paradigms for spatial metadata. (Ph. D. Thesis: University of Maine). Gonzalez, Jorge, "Problems that arise when providing geographic coordinate information for cataloged maps," Coordinates: Online Journa l of the Map and Geography Round Table, American Library Association ser. B:8, http://purl.oclc.org/coordinates/b8.pdf (accessed October 16, 2007) Goodchild, M.F. & Janelle, D.G. 2004. Thinking spatially in the social sciences in Spatially Integrated Social Science New York: Oxford University Press. Goodchild, Michael. 1998. The geo library in Steve Carter (ed.), Innovations in GIS, Chapter 5. London: Taylor and Francis.

PAGE 76

76 Graf, William L. 2004. In the cr itical zone: Geography at th e U.S. Geological Survey. The Professional Geographer 56, no. 1:100-108. Gluck, Myke. 1996. Geospatial information need s of the general public: text, maps, and users tasks, in Geographic information system s and libraries: patrons, maps and spatial information (eds. Smith, L. and Guck, M.). Gurnitsky, Joanna. 2006. Try Google Earth: a Magnificent Satellite View of the World. Retrieved Fall 2006 from http://netforbeginners.about.com /od/readerpicks/a/google_earth.htm Harvard University Library. 2006. R ecords for Geographic Headings, in Bibliographic Standards (p. 20), retrieved Fall 2006 from http://hul.harvard.edu/cmtes/haac/HUL_Bibliographic_Standards.pdf Hiddenway. 2000(?). Map of C ontinent of Arthom from http://hiddenway.tripod.com Hill, Linda L. 2006. Representation of Geospatial Location in Georeferencing: The Geographic Associations of Information. MIT Press. Hill, Linda L., et al. 2000. Alexandria Dig ital Library: User evaluation studies and system design, in Journal of the American Socie ty for Information Science 51, no.3:246-259. Hill, Linda L. and Janee, Greg. [2004?]. The Alexandria Digital Library Project: Metadata Development and Use retrieved Fall 2006 from. http://www.alexandria.ucsb.edu/~gjan ee/archive/2004/metadata-chapter.pdf Hill, Linda L. and Zheng, Ki. 1999. Indirect geospatial refere ncing through place names in the digital library: Alexandria Digita l Library Experience with Developing and Implementing Gazetteers http://www.alexandria.ucsb.edu/~zheng/papers/asis99.pdf International Conference on the Principles and Future Development of AACR, 1997, Toronto, Ont. 1998. The principles and future of AACR Jean Weihs, ed., Chicago: American Library Association. John L;s Old Maps. 2000. Detail from: A Map of Louisiana and of the River Mississippi" which appears to be from approx. 1710-20. fron: http://www.jlindquist.com/maps.html Joint Steering Committee (JSC) for Revision of AACR. April 24-28, 2005. Outcomes of the Meeting of the Joint Steering Committee, Chicago. Retrieved Fall 2007 from http://www.collectionscanada.ca/jsc/0504out.html.

PAGE 77

77 Jue, Dean K. 1996. Implementing GIS in the Public Library Arena, in Geographic Information Systems and Libraries: Patrons, Maps, and Spatial Information, Smith & Gluck., eds. Urbana-Champagin: Univ. of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Graduate School of Library and Information Science. Kearns, Robin. 2001. "(Dis)spirited Geography?," in Journal of Geography in Higher Education. 25, no. 3:299-309. Lai, P. and Gillies. C. F. 1991. The impact of geographical information systems on the role of spatial data libraries, in International Journal of Geographical Information Science. Larsgaard, Mary Lynette. 1978. Map Librarianship: An Introduction Littleton, CO: Libraries Unlimited. Larsgaard, Mary Lynette. 1996. Cataloging pl anetospatial data in digital form: Old wine, new bottlesnew wine, old bottles, in Geographic information systems and libraries: patrons, maps and spatial information (eds. Smith, L. and Gluck, M.). Larson, R.R. 1996. Geographic information retrieval and spatia l browsing, in Geographic information systems and lib raries: patrons, maps, and spatial information : [papers presented at the 1995 Clinic on Library Applications of Data Processing, April 10-12, 1995]: 81-124. Retrieved Fall 2005 from http://www.ideals.uiuc.edu/ bitstream/2142/416/2/Larson.pdf Larson, R., and Frontiera, P.. 2004. Ranking and Representation for Geographic Information Retrieval. Paper presented at the Workshop on Geographic Information Retrieval ACM SIGIR 2004, Sheffield, UK. Lesk, M. 1989. What to do when theres too much information from Conference on Hypertext and Hypermedia Pr oceedings. New York, ACM Press. Library of Congress. Network Develo pment and MARC Standards Office. 2006. MARC 21 Concise Format for Bibliographic Dat a, Number and Code Fields (01X-04X), 034-Coded Cartographic Mathematical Data http://www.loc.gov/marc/bibliographic/ecbdnumb.html#mrcb034 Lubas, Rebecca L. 2003. The Evolution of Bibliographic Control of Maps, Cataloging and Classification Quarterly 35:3/4. Lundgren, Jimmie and Gonzalez, Jorge A. 2004. Recording geographic coordinates, in MARC Discussion Paper no. 2006-DP01 from http://www.loc.gov/marc/marbi/2006/2006-dp01.html

PAGE 78

78 Mangan, Elizabeth U. (ed.). 2005. Cartographic materials: a m anual of interpretation for AACR2, 2004 Update prepared by the Anglo-Amer ican Cataloguing Committee for Cartographic Materials, 2nd ed. Chicago: American Library Association. Martell, Charles R. 2005. The Ubiquitous Us er: A Reexamination of Carlsons Deserted Library, from [Gue st Editorial in] portal: Libraries and the Academy. 5, no. 4:441. Maxwell, Robert L. 2004. Maxwell's handbook for AACR2: explaining and illustrating the Anglo-American cataloguing rules through the 2003 update. Chicago: American Library Association. MAGERT. 2007. The ALA Map and Geography Round Table, retrieved Summer 2007 from http://www.ala.org/ala/magert/magert.htm McEathron, Scott R. 2002. Cartogra phic Materials as Works, from Works as Entries for Information Retrieval Richard P. Smiraglia, ed. New York, Haworth Information Press. National Research Council. 1994. Promoting the national spa tial data infr astructure through partnerships, from: http://www.nap.edu/catalog/4895.html OCLC. 2003. OCLC Bibliographic Form ats and Standards. November 2003. [ 034 versus 255 MARC Fields ]. Retrieved Fall 2006 from: http://www.oclc.org/bibformats/en Onsrud, Harland J. 1995. Role of Law in Impeding and Facilitating the Sharing of Geographic Information retrieved Fall 2006 from http://www.spatial.maine.edu/~onsrud/pubs/roleoflaw36.pdf Parry, R.B. 1995. "The electronic map libra ry: new maps, new uses, new users," in LIBER Quarterly, the journal of European research libraries 5, no 3:262-273. Parry, Robert B. & Perkins, C. R.. 2000. World mapping today, 2nd ed. New Providence, N.J.: Bowker-Saur. Pickles, John. 1997. "GIS, Technoscien ce, and the Theoretical Turn," Annals of the Association of American Geographers. 87, no. 2:263-372. Rauber, Andreas and Tjoa, A Min. 2000? User interfaces for digital libraries. Retrieved Summer 2006 from: http://www.ifs.tuwien.ac.at/ifs/gener al_information/peopl e/tjoa/pub_pdf/rau_ocg0 1.pdf Resort Graphics Internat ional. 2000(?). Map of K ey West, Florida from http://www.keywest.com/keywestaerial/

PAGE 79

79 Roes, Hans. 2001. Digital Libraries and E ducation: Trends and Opportunities, D-Lib Magazine v.28, no. 6, 2001. Retrieved Fall 2006, from http://www.dlib.org/dlib /july01/roes/07roes.html Rusbridge, Chris. 1998. Towards the Hybrid Library. D-Lib Magazine. July issue. Sears, Brian. April 10, 2004. Geocoding ch allenges: why accuracy matters, in Directions Magazine http://www.directionsmag.com/ Shabaee, Pual. 2002. Primary multimedia objects and 'Educational Metadata': A fundamental dilemma for developers of multimedia archives, in D-Lib Magazine v.8, no. 6, 2002. Retrieved Summer 2007, from http://www.dlib.org/dlib/june 02/shabajee/06shabajee.html Shank, John D. 2006. Establishing our presence in courseware: Adding library services to the virtual classroom, in Information Technology and Libraries v.22. no.1. Retrieved June 2007 from http://news.ala.org/ala/lita/ litapublications/i tal/2201shank.cfm Stevenson, Bill. 2000. Servicing map users at Aalborg University Library, in Liber Quarterly 10:454-464. Smith,A., & Sproles, C. 2004. Don't Get Lost!: The Basics of Orga nizing a Library's Map Collecton, in Kentucky Libraries, 68, no.2:22-27. Smits, Jan. 2000. Can a map be a geographic information retrieval tool? in LIBER Quarterly, the Journal of European Research Libraries 10, no 4. from http://libermaps.kb.nl/articles/12smits.html Smits, Jan 1999. [Digital Cartographic Mate rials] Metadata: an Introduction, in Cataloging and Classification Quarterly 27, no. 2:303-319. Smits, Jan. 2002. "Geospatial Data Access: Can We Manage To Shift?," in INSPEL. 36. no. 1:22-48. Tom, Henry. 1994. "The Geographic In formation Systems (GIS) Standards Infrastructures," in StandardView. 2, no.3:133-142. United State Geological Survey, Board of Geographic Names. 2007. BGN Website retrieved Summer 2007 from http://geonames.usgs.gov/ Welch, Grace D. and Williams, Frank. 1999. Cataloguing Digital Cartographic, in Materials Cataloging and Classification Quarterly 27, no. 2:343-362. Wieczorek, John, Guo, Qinghua & Hijmanns, Robert J. 2004. The point-radius method for georeferencing locality descriptions a nd calculating associated uncertainty, in International Journal of Geogr aphical Information Science. 18, no.8:745-767.

PAGE 80

80 Wiegand, Patrick.. 2006. Learning and teaching with maps. New York: Routledge. Wood, William B. 2000. GIS as a to ol for territorial negotiations in IBRU Boundary and Security Bulletin (Autumn issue):72-78 Woodruff, Allison Gyle & Plaunt, Christ ian. 1999. GIPSY: Automated geographic indexing of text documents, in Journal of the American Society for Information Science. 45, no. 9. Wright, Bruce and Urban-Math ieux, Brigitta. (1996?). Development of an Electronic National Atlas Prototype (USGS publication) retrieved Summer 2007 from http://www.gis.usu.edu/docs/protecte d/procs/esri/1997/PROC97/TO600/PAP576/ P576.HTM University of Florida Librarie s Catalog, "Advanced Search," http://uf.catalog.fcla.edu/uf.jsp Youngblood, Dawn. 2006. Map use acr oss the disciplines, in Journal of Map & Geography Libraries 2, no. 2:33-66 Yu, Lixin 1999. Knowledge discovery in spatia l cartographic informa tion retrieval, in Library Trends 48, no. 1.

PAGE 81

81 BIOGRAPHICAL SKETCH Jorge Gonzlez received a Bachelor of Arts degree in December 2003 from the University of Florida, Gainesville. He worked full time at the University of Florida, George A. Smathers Libraries as a science and map cataloger while finishing both his undergraduate and masters degree. His academic and professional interests include demographic information and library and metadata standards.