Citation
Public Relations and Public Diplomacy for Plan Colombia

Material Information

Title:
Public Relations and Public Diplomacy for Plan Colombia
Creator:
Botero, Juan
Molleda, Juan Carlos ( Mentor )
Place of Publication:
Gainesville, Fla.
Publisher:
University of Florida
Publication Date:
Language:
English

Subjects

Genre:
serial ( sobekcm )

Record Information

Source Institution:
University of Florida
Holding Location:
University of Florida
Rights Management:
All applicable rights reserved by the source institution and holding location.

Downloads

This item has the following downloads:


Full Text








Journ31l of uni.nerr.3adua.- Res--earch

..Oluin-e 4, ic.ue 12 - Selen-l-er 12i: :



Public Relations and Public Diplomacy for Plan Colombia

Juan Bolero


The purpose of this study1 is to identify and evaluate the public relations strategies and tactics used by
the Colombian Government and related organizations to gain the support of the U.S. government and people for

the approval of "Plan Colombia." The data for this study was gathered through primary and secondary

research. Primary research consisted of four intensive interviews conducted via telephone and face-to-face

meetings with government officials, political analysts, and public relations professionals. Secondary data

includes newspaper articles, website contents, and literature pertaining to the convergence of public relations

and public diplomacy.



Information on public relations and public diplomacy used by Latin American governments is scarce, yet it is

a growing practice in this part of the world. The present article attempts to contribute to the body of

knowledge available and to increase the understanding of the region, its practices, and interactions with the

world's publics.



LITERARY REVIEW


Even though the literature on Latin American public relations is limited, the importance of the inclusion of

foreign publics is well documented. Signitzer and Coombs (1992) indicate how the advances on technology and

the ability to reach audiences create a greater need to "include foreign publics as part of their public

relations targets" (p.137). However, the areas of political science and international relations address

most communications between nations today.



Nevertheless, the functions of public relations and public diplomacy are merging into a more suited field for

the international communication of nations and their need to convey a message to their foreign publics.



A parallel between Latin America and Africa is a good example of the use of public relations and public diplomacy

for developing nations:


President [Robert] Mugabe decided to organize a campaign against the imposition of possible sanctions





against Zimbabwe by the international community. He was lobbying the international community against

the sanctions by involving his ambassador to the United States, Washington and the European Union. They talked

to United States congressmen [sic] and the Black Caucus to try and reject the Zimbabwe Bill.

Zimbabwe's representatives in the US [sic] have also been lobbying and persuading African diplomats based

in Washington to oppose the Bill, while former American ambassador to the UN, Andrew Young and a public

relations firm, Cohen & Woods International, have been enlisted by the Zimbabwe government to fight the

impending sanctions. (Rensburg, 2002, p. 40)



Foreign diplomats compete for the attention of American decision makers to influence the decisions made

in Congress. Therefore, countries use a range of activities to fulfill this goal. In 1991, the government of

Colombia paid $3.1 million in consulting fees to the Sawyer/Miller Group to produce newspaper ads, pamphlets,

and letters to the editor which were sent to journalists all around the United States (Zaharna & Villalobos, 2000).

The premise of Sawyer/Miller Group's campaign was to change Colombia's image "from the villain to the victim,

then turn the victim into a hero, and then define the hero as a leader in the war on drugs" (Zaharna &

Villalobos, 2000, 34).



These tools being used by foreign governments and interests exemplify the close relationship between

public relations and public diplomacy. The overlapping of these two branches of communication is creating

an identifiable procedure in which it becomes more adroit for foreign governments and different types

of organizations to communicate.



Gruning (1993) reiterates this point when he claims that modernen governments and other

international organizations thus find themselves using public relations strategies as they conduct what

political scientists have called public diplomacy" (141). Furthermore, he points out the importance of the

personal influence model of public relations2. The government of Colombia in its dealings with the U.S.
Congress through ambassador Moreno exemplifies this practice.



PLAN COLOMBIA


A strong public relations/public diplomacy campaign was developed during Ernesto Samper government (1994-

1998), when the U.S. government decertified Colombia in its war on drugs. This was done with the assistance of

the Kelley Swofford Roy, Inc. Company (KSR), whose goal was "to reinstate Colombia's 'certified' status, to lower

the risk of economic sanctions and to correct the impression that Colombia was not doing enough"3.


KSR developed a comprehensive plan targeting a range of constituencies including the American public at

large, policy-makers in Washington and Colombian Americans. The project included: seminars, policy "white"

papers, lobbying, targeted constituency direct mail, press briefing materials, media relations, public

speaking engagements, and a targeted newspaper advertising campaign. After two years, Colombia was






certified again by the Bill Clinton administration4


In 1998, when Andres Pastrana was elected president, he presented a plan that would address the violence and

the drug trafficking that had created such severe damage to his country (Garcia, 2001). The plan was intended

to become something of a Marshall Plan for Colombia to rebuild its institutions and the areas that had been

forgotten for so long leaving them to the authority of the guerrilla. With the approval of the plan, the government

of Colombia becomes one of the largest recipients of American security aid after Israel and Egypt

("Dangerous times," 2000).



To convince the U.S. Congress to approve the plan, the government of Colombia had to develop an extensive

public relations and public diplomacy effort. The Ambassador of Colombia in Washington D.C., Luis Eduardo

Moreno, played an essential role in securing the confidence of the U.S Congress in the efforts of the

Colombian government in fighting against drugs.



In his term as ambassador for the Pastrana government, Moreno visited more than 162 times the U.S.

Congress (Martinez,2002). As a result, Moreno convinced 50 senators and other important decision makers to go

to Colombia and look at the situation first hand. Among those who visited the anti-narcotics teams, the illicit

crops areas, and different regions of Colombia were Attorney General Janet Reno, Secretary of Energy

Bill Richardson, Senator Christopher Dodds from Connecticut, Driana Feinstein from California, Bob Graham

from Florida, the president of the New York Stock Exchange Richard Grasso, owner of The Washington Post

Katherine Graham, along with many others (Martinez, 2002).



Through the Akin Gump and Strauss lobbying firm the ambassador arranged meetings with the top decision

makers in Washington to achieve the approval of the plan (Martinez,2002). It was finally passed by a very

narrow margin in June 2000, opening the way to the allocation of 1.3 billion dollars to the government of Colombia.



DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION


This article had the purpose of studying the way the Colombian Government has used public relations and

public diplomacy with the goal of gaining the economic support to develop "Plan Colombia." Here is illustrated

the way in which international communications in the form of public relations and public diplomacy are merging

to best fulfill the necessities of nation states to communicate a message and influence the public opinion of a

foreign public.



The research, although concerns the particular case of Colombia, provides an example to the way in which

foreign governments utilize the available public relations and public diplomacy tools that in the past have

been considered more of the political science realm. As public relations practitioners and the entire field develop,

a stronger tendency to specialize in the field of international public relations is created.






With the opportunity and the tools available, the field of international public relations is becoming a mayor area

of study and of importance for the decision makers everywhere. Latin America in particular has a great deal

of potential for practitioners and for academics to study and to develop with the public relations practices around

the world.



METHODOLOGY


The qualitative research involved a content analysis of advocacy advertising published in newspapers like The

New York times, The Washington Post, The Chicago Tribune, Los Angeles Times, Miami Herald, among others.

The boundaries for the analysis were the period of January 1, 1994 to December 31, 2000. In-depth interviews

where carried out via telephone and face-to-face with agencies and Colombian government officials.


FOOTNOTES



1. University of Florida Institutional Review Board approval was sought and granted for the study's primary

research stage. Back

2. Sriramesh (1992, 1996) first introduced the personal influence model to the public relations literature. Back

3. Personal interview with Rafael Lamo-Gomez, October 25, 2002. Back

4. Personal interview with Rafael Lamo-Gomez, October 25, 2002. Back


REFERENCES


Arana, A. (1992). The Colombian connection. Columbia Journalism Review. Retrieved October 13, 2002, from:

http://www.cjr.org/

Bardos, A. A. (2001). 'Public Diplomacy:'An old art a new profession. The Virginia Quarterly Review, 77(3), 434-437.

Carnes, L. (1998). The past and future of diplomacy. Orbis, 42, 49-72.

Clyde, B. (2001). Daring to be heard: Advertorials by organized interests on the Op-Ed

page of the New York Times,1985-1998. Political Communication, 18(1) 23-51.

Ctc-TribLetter. (2000, March 12). Are we fools rushing into Colombia? Message posted to http://www.

chicagotribune.com/interact/boards/.

De La Garza, P. (2000, October 16). Congress takes stock in Colombia's war on cocaine. St. Petersburg Times, p. 1A.





Dangerous plans for Colombia. (2000, February 13). [Editorial]. The New York Times, Section 4, p.16.


Dudley, S. (2000, August 23). Colombian groups say U.S. aid endanger them. The Washington Post, p. A04.


Ferrer, Yadira. (2000, December 20). Review 2000-Colombia: Anti-drug plan fans flames of war. Inter Press

Service, Retrieved November 10 from: Lexis-Nexis Academic Universe.


Garcia, A. (2001). Plan Colombia y la ayuda estadounidense: Una fusion traumitica. In L.A. Restrepo (Ed.), El

Plan Colombia y la internacionalizaci6n del conflict (pp. 193-297). Bogota, Colombia: Editorial Planeta Colombiana.


Grunig, J.E. (1993). Public relations and international affairs: Effects, ethics and Responsibility. Journal

of International Affairs, 47(1), 138-161.


Hallin, D. C., & Papathanassopoulos, S. (2002). Political clientelism and the media: Southern Europe and

Latin America in comparative perspective. Media, Culture and Society, 24, 176-195.


Hines A. (1997). Preventing war and disorder: "preventive diplomacy" emulates public-health strategies. The

Futurist, 31(5), 14-16.


Kunczik, M. (1997). Images of nations and international public relations. Mahwah, NJ: Laurence Erlbaum Associates.


LaFranchi, H. (2002). What's at stake? The Christian Science Monitor, World, Retrieved December 20, 2002

from: http://www.csmonitor.com


Martinez, F.M. (2002). El pequeho gran negociador. Revista Diners, Retrieved November 20, 2002, from: http://

www.revistadiners.com.co


Nyhan, D. (2000, July 7). Vietnam all over again: The Colombian drug war. Boston Globe, p. ?


Peterson, J. (2000, January 15). Albright pushes anti-drug plan in visit to Colombia. Los Angeles Times, p. A9.


Rensburg, R. (2002, June). The Bled manifesto on public relations: An African perspective and vision. Proceedings

of BledComm 2002 in conjunction with 2002 Euprera Annual Congress. Bled, Slovenia.


Signitzer, B.H., & Coombs, T. (1992). Public relations and public diplomacy: Conceptual Convergences.

Public Relations Review, 18, 137-147.


Sriramesh, K. (1992). Societal culture and public relations: Ethnographic evidence from India. Public

Relations Review, 18, 201-211.


Sriramesh, K. (1996). Power distance and public relations: An ethnographic study of southern Indian

organizations. In H.M. Culbertson &N. Chen (Eds.), International public relations: A comparative analysis (pp.

171-190). Mahwah, NJ: Laerence Erlbaum Associates.


Vaquez, R. L. (2001). Opportunities and challenges for the 21st century. In R.L. Heath (Ed.), Handbook of

Public Relations (pp. 629-637). Thousand Oaks, Ca: Sage Publications.


Wilson, S. (2000, November 21). U.S. drug chief tries to boost Colombian resolve; Mcaffrey vows long-term

support. The Washington Post, Pg. A22.







Yes on aid to Colombia. (2000, February 10) [Editorial]. The Washington Post, p. A22.


Zaharna, R.S., &Villalobos J.C. (2000). A public relations tour of embassy row: The Latin diplomatic

experience. Public Relations Quarterly, 45, 33-37.


--top--



Back to the Journal of Undergraduate Research


College of Liberal Arts and Sciences I University Scholars Program I University of Florida I


UP| UNIVERSITY of
U |FLORIDA
TWP imstl s f," Shrr Gyor Nahou


� University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611; (352) 846-2032.