![]() ![]() |
![]() |
|
UFDC Home |
myUFDC Home | Help | ![]() |
Historic note | |
Main |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Full Citation | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Table of Contents | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Historic note
Historic note Main Page 1 Page 2 |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Full Text | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
HISTORIC NOTE The publications in this collection do not reflect current scientific knowledge or recommendations. These texts represent the historic publishing record of the Institute for Food and Agricultural Sciences and should be used only to trace the historic work of the Institute and its staff. Current IFAS research may be found on the Electronic Data Information Source (EDIS) site maintained by the Florida Cooperative Extension Service. Copyright 2005, Board of Trustees, University of Florida North Florida Research and Education Center IFAS, University of Florida Route 3 Box 4370 Quincy, FL 32351 Central Science Library NFREC Research Report- 90-20 MAY 2 1990 Tomato Cultivar Evaluation, Fall 1989 ty of Florida J. M. Snell and S. M. Olson Biological Scientist III and Associate Professor INTRODUCTION Fall tomato production has been on the increase in northwest Florida. In 1989 season almost 2000 acres were planted compared to about 800 acres 3 years ago. Much of the increase was because of the release of 'Solar Set'. This trial evaluated 13 entire for'potential production for the fall season. Materials and Methods This evaluation was conducted at the North Florida Research and Education Center on Orangeburg loamy fine sand. Tomatoes were seeded in 2 in. X 2 in. expanded polystyrene flats on June 6, 1989. Transplants were placed in the field on July 26,. 1989. Plant spacing was 20 in. in row and 6 ft. between rows (7,260 linear ft/A). The tomatoes were grown with white on black polyethylene mulch and trickle irrigation. Total fertilizer applied was 181-148-211 lb/A N-P 0r-K20. Plots were one row 20-ft long and were arranged in a randomized complete block with four replications. Weeds, insects and diseases were controlled with timely applications of registered chemical products. Plots were harvested from October 3 to October 24, 1989, and were graded according to size and marketability. There were four harvests. There were thirteen entries in the evaluation. Results and Discussion Table 1 is a listing of yield (25 lb cartons/A), percent marketable fruit and average fruit weight (oz.) for all entries evaluated. Yield is shown for medium, large, extra large and total fruit production. Extra large fruit sells for the highest price per carton. The majority of fall tomato acreage in north Florida is currently planted in the variety 'Solar Set'. 'Heat Wave' produced higher total yield (1990 cartons/A) than all other entries except 'Solar Set' (1620 cartons/A). 'Heat Wave' produced higher extra large yield (1148 cartons/A) than all other entries. 'Solar Set' (903 cartons/A) was second in extra large yield. 'Heat Wave' (73%) and 'Solar Set' (71%) had the highest percentage of marketable fruit. There was very slight difference in average fruit weight for all entries. Average fruit weight ranged from 5.3 to 6.1 oz./fruit. Table 1. Yield, percentage marketable fruit and average fruit size for fall 1989 tomato evaluations. Marketable Average Marketable yield (25 lb cartons/A) fruit fruit weight Entry medium large extra large total (%) (oz.) Heat Wave 248 b-dz 594 ab 1148 a 1990 a 73.0 a 6.1 a Solar Set 277 a-c 440 b-e 903 b 1620 a-c 71.0 a 5.9 ab 7209 234 b-d 410 c-e 861 bc 1505 b-d 60.8 bc 5.6 ab 7211 291 ab 555 a-c 637 c-f 1483 b-d 61.3 bc 5.4 b NVH 4466 228 b-d 480 a-d 775 b-d 1483 b-d 58.6 b-d 5.8 ab PSR 80087 253 a-d 377 de 672 b-e 1303 c-e 61.8 bc 5.8 ab 7293 183 cd 412 c-e 686 b-d 1282 c-e 62.8 b 5.9 ab PSR 89787 194 b-d 371 de 636 c-f 1201 c-f 53.9 c-e 6.1 a 7249 149 d 300 e 709 b-d 1158 d-f 58.7 b-d 6.1 a Sunny 172 cd 381 de 585 d-f 1139 d-f 51.0 de 5.7 ab 7248 227 b-d 356 de 435 e-g 1018 ef 57.5 b-d 5.4 b PSR 80187 202 b-d 309 e 409 fg 920 ef 59.7 bd 6.0 a Flora-Tom II 207 b-d 294 e 313 g 814 f 46.9 e 5.3 b ZMean separation by Duncan's Multiple Range Test, 5% level. Table 2. Entries and'seed sources for fall 1989 tomato evaluation. Entry Seed Source Flora-Tom II Petoseed Company, Inc. Heat Wave Petoseed Company, Inc. NVH 4466 Northrup King Co. PSR 80087 Petoseed Company, Inc. PSR 80187 Petoseed Company, Inc. PSR 89787 Petoseed Company, Inc. Solar Set Asgrow Seed Co./University of Florida Sunny Asgrow Seed Co. 7209 Gulf Coast REC, University of Florida 7211 Gulf Coast REC, University of Florida 7248 Gulf Coast REC, University of Florida 7249 Gulf Coast REC, University of Florida 7293 Gulf Coast REC, University of Florida |