![]() ![]() |
![]() |
|
UFDC Home |
myUFDC Home | Help | ![]() |
Historic note | |
Title Page | |
Table of Contents | |
Main | |
Reference |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Full Citation | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Table of Contents | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Historic note
Unnumbered ( 1 ) Title Page Title Page Table of Contents Page i Main Page 1 Page 2 Page 3 Page 4 Page 5 Page 6 Page 7 Page 8 Page 9 Page 10 Page 11 Page 12 Reference Page 13 |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Full Text | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
HISTORIC NOTE The publications in this collection do not reflect current scientific knowledge or recommendations. These texts represent the historic publishing record of the Institute for Food and Agricultural Sciences and should be used only to trace the historic work of the Institute and its staff. Current IFAS research may be found on the Electronic Data Information Source (EDIS) site maintained by the Florida Cooperative Extension Service. Copyright 2005, Board of Trustees, University of Florida Daniel S. Tiiiey Economic information Report 53 Estimated Costs of Picking and Hauling Florida Citrus Fruits, 197, -75 ( `-----.- Season Food and Resource Economics Department Agricultural Experiment Stations institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences University of Florida, Gainesville 32611 June 1976 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page LIST OF TABLES . . . . SUMMARY . . . . . . . SAMPLE FIRMS . . . . . DATA COLLECTED AND COST DISTRIBUTION PROCEDURES . . PICKING AND HAULING COST ESTIMATES . . . COST TRENDS . . . . SELECTED REFERENCES . . . . LIST OF TABLES . 13 Table 1 Estimated average cost per box for picking and hauling citrus fruits for fresh packing and processing, 1974-75 season . . . . . . . 2 Average cost per box for picking and hauling citrus fruits, 25 seasons, 1950-51 to 1974-75 . . . 3 Relationship of picking and hauling cost to the per-box price of oranges used for concentrate, 16 seasons, 1960-1975 . . . . . . 4 Index of citrus picking and hauling costs, 1960-61 through 1974-75 seasons (1960-61 1964-65 = 100) . Page 4 7 8 9 5 Changes in the cost items that make up estimated total picking and hauling costs for oranges, 15 seasons, 1960-61 through 1974-75 (Index = 1960-61 to 1964-65 average) . ... ... ... . 10 * * COSTS OF PICKING AND HAULING FLORIDA CITRUS, 1974-75 ;r.c.i, Daniel S. Tilley and Alvin H. Spurlock SUMMARY Florida citrus picking and hauling cost estimates for the 1974-75 season are presented. Data used to develop the estimates were collected from 21 citrus handling firms. Orange picking and roadsiding costs in the 1974-75 season were 84 cents per box--a decrease of about 8 percent from the figure estimated for the 1973-74 season. Grapefruit and tangerine picking and roadsiding costs were estimated to be 68 and 158 cents per box. Hauling costs for all types of fruit were estimated to be 15 cents per box, a 2 percent decrease from 1973-74 levels. Total citrus picking and hauling costs declined somewhat in 1974-75 but were higher than in any preceding season except 1973-74. Total picking and hauling cost estimates for oranges and grapefruit were lower by 7 and 2 percent respectively from 1973-74 season estimates, and tan- gerines were the same. Picking labor cost decreases accounted for the largest share of the total decrease. SAMPLE FIRMS Estimates of the cost of picking, roadsiding and hauling oranges, grapefruit and tangerines were developed by summarizing accounting records available from 21 citrus handling firms. Of the 21 firms in the sample, 19 were located in the Interior and two were located in DANIEL S. TILLEY is assistant professor of food and resource economics, and ALVIN H. SPURLOCK is emeritus professor of food and resource economics. the Indian River area. Four of the firms were independent citrus dealers and 17 were packinghouses and/or processors. The larger firms in the sample handled fruit from throughout the citrus-producing regions. The five firms with the largest picking volume in the sample were responsible for 57 percent of the total boxes of fruit represented in the sample. The five firms with the largest hauling volume in the sample accounted for 51 percent of the fruit represented in the sample. On the other hand, the five firms with the lowest picking volume accounted for only 6 percent of the fruit represented in the sample, and the five firms with the lowest hauling volume accounted for only 5 percent of the fruit represented in the sample. Picking cost information was available on 35 million boxes of fruit, or approximately 15 percent of total Florida production [4, p. 6]. Hauling cost information was available on 49 million boxes of fruit, or approximately 21 percent of total Florida production [4, p. 6]. Picking cost information was provided on an average of 1.8 million boxes per firm and hauling cost information was provided on an average of 2.3 million boxes per firm. Four firms provided data on less than 0.6 million boxes while ten firms provided data on over 2 million boxes. Most firms contracted with other operators to pick and haul some of their total volume. The costs of contract crews, if data pertaining to them could be separated, were not included because it was difficult to determine the services performed, the kind of fruit and the number of boxes hauled. However, in many firms, costs for contracting were inseparably mixed with the information on services performed by firms' own crews; hence, the averages represent total costs for all labor and equipment. DATA COLLECTED AND COST DISTRIBUTION PROCEDURES2 The data supplied by most firms in the sample were accounting information from their auditors' reports. Some auditors' reports Some firms were responsible for picking and hauling more fruit than was represented in the sample. The procedures described are the same as those described by Tilley [5]. provided cost information for picking and a separate series of costs for hauling. Other auditors' reports included only the combined costs of picking and hauling. Only three firms in the sample provi ',- infor- mation by type of fruit. For those firms providing only to:al' dollar amounts for each expense item for picking, roadsiding and hailing oper- ations, it was first necessary to determine how much of each expense item should be allocated to picking and to hauling. Then it was neces- sary to allocate picking expenses among types of fruit. It was assumed that hauling cost per box does not vary by type of fruit hauled. In general, the allocations of expenses between picking and hauling and among types of fruit are based on personal knowledge of a firm's operation or on information provided by other firms in the sample, Quite often it was also necessary to separate a total labor figure into the five labor categories shown in the following tables. None of the sample firms provided information in a form comparable with that shown in Table 1. Therefore, the validity of the comparisons among types of fruit depends on information provided by the firms that do provide comparisons. It has been documented that distance [2], hauling method [ij, truck size [1] and other factors affect picking and hauling costs. The data used to develop the averages presented in this report were not provided in sufficient detail to analyze the effects of these factors on total picking and hauling cost because the auditor's report for each firm summarizes the cost results for a variety of distances, hauling methods and truck sizes. Also, fruit delivered to processors is handled dif- ferently than fruit delivered to packinghouses. It is not known if the sample firms properly represent the industry distribution of type of fruit by method or destination. Picking costs include all amounts paid for direct labor for picking and delivery to the roadside, field truck and tractor expense, and a portion of overhead and administrative expenses. Picking labor costs, when not available by type of fruit, were allocated to the various types of fruit by estimated piece rates. Fuel and repairs were allocated equally per box for all kinds of fruit picked. Certain other expenses, which do not fluctuate directly with changes in volume, were distributed such that the per-box costs would be in the ratio of 1.00 for grapefruit, Table 1.--Estimated average cost per box for picking and hauling citrus fruits for fresh packing and processing, 1974-75 season Service performed and commodity Item of cost Picking to Oran Grape- Tanigr- an fruit ne plant fruit ines Hauling Total pick & haul Hauling rgs Grape- Oranges Nu:'ber of operators 19 19 18 21 rui_ ines Average volume 1,262,451 379,512 78,784 2,327,279 -Cents er ox - - - Labor Supervisorya 5.55 Pickers 51.87 Loaders & drivers 3.84 Secl:-drivers -- Other Labor 1.24 Subtotal b 62.50 Payroll taxes 7.09 Total labor 69.59 Other Costs Tuel & oil 2.07 Repairs & maintenance 4.83 Licenses & taxes .18 Depreciation 2.11 Insurance .49 Supplies .59 Equipment rental .39 Migratory labor expense .27 Miscellaneous .27 Administrative 3.37 Total other costs 14.57 Total costs 84.16 Range in costs--low 65.71 --hi g 95.12 Standard deviation 8.75 6.84 38.54 3.81 1.00 50.19 5.72 55.91 1.93 4.65 .12 1.60 .37 .37 .33 .12 .22 2,32 12.03 67.94 51.80 79.70 7.47 11.89 104. 19 8.18 .78 125.04 14.01 139.05 2.01 4.56 .32 4.21 .90 .74 .48 .41 .52 5.03 19.18 158.23 .04 4.01 .56 4.61 .54 5.15 1.80 3.50 .60 2.22 .45 .05 .28 .20 1.11 10.21 15.36 128.83 10.25 193.80 22.65 19.40 2.96 aIncludes foremen. Also includes workmen's compensation. CIncludes management and office salaries, office supplies, auto, travel and entertain- ment, interest paid, legal and audit, advertising, dues and subscriptions, donations and telephone and telegraph. A range of one standard deviation above and below the mean usually includes about two- thirds of the observations. Ninety-five percent of the firms are within the range of two standard deviations from the mean. Tange r- 5.59 51.87 3.84 4.01 1.80 67.11 7.63 74.74 3.87 8.33 .78 4.33 .94 .64 .67 .27 .47 4.48 24_ 78 99.52 75.96 115,15 10.47 6.88 38.54 3.81 4.01 1.56 54.80 6.26 61.06 3.73 8.15 .72 3.82 .82 .42 .61 .12 .42 3.43 22.24 83.30 62.80 99.73 9.23 11.93 104.19 8.18 4.01 1.34 129.65 14.55 144.20 3.81 8.06 .92 6.43 1.35 .79 .76 .41 .72 6.14 29.39 173.59 147.69 212.07 20.32 1.50 for oranges and 3.00 for tangerines. Expenses in this group include licenses and taxes, depreciation, insurance, miscellaneous items and administrative expense. PICKING AND HAULING COST ESTIMATES Picking and loading refers to all activities involved in getting the fruit from the tree to roadside. Itemized average picking costs per box for oranges, grapefruit and tangerines and hauling costs are shown in Table 1. The numbers reported in the tables are calculated by summing the total dollars spent for each item by the sample firms and dividing by the total boxes of fruit harvested by the sample firms (i.e., the averages are weighted averages where the weights are the number of boxes picked by the firms). Buyers' salaries, commissions and expenses for fruit procurement and sale are omitted. Costs such as telephone and auto expenses, which are associated with selling as well as harvesting operations, are diffi- cult to assign to specific operations and may still be included in the information obtained from a few firms. The largest item in the cost of picking citrus is labor. All labor including payroll taxes and workmen's compensation insurance was 82 per- cent of the total cost of picking and loading oranges and grapefruit and 88 percent for tangerines. The amount paid the fruit picker was more than three-fourths of the labor cost. Total picking cost in 1974-75 declined from the previous season by 7.6 percent for oranges and 2.1 percent for grapefruit. Tangerine picking cost remained almost the same. The hauling operation refers to the transportation of fruit from the roadside to the processing plant or fresh packinghouse. Labor, in- cluding payroll taxes and workmen'.s compensation insurance accounted for 34 percent of the total hauling cost. Other items of cost were repairs 23 percent, depreciation 14 percent, fuel 12 percent and admin- istration 7 percent. Hauling cost for 1974-75 declined 1.9 percent from the previous season. The combined picking and hauling costs for 1974-75, shown in Table 1, were obtained by adding the picking cost for each type of fruit to the hauling cost. Labor costs accounted for 75, 73 and 85 percent of total picking and hauling costs for oranges, grapefruit and tangerines respectively. COST TRENDS Citrus picking and hauling costs declined in the 1974-75 season from the preceding season--which was the highest for which data are available (Table 2). Total picking and hauling costs for oranges and grapefruit decreased 6.8 and 2.0 percent, respectively, from the 1973-74 season costs; and tangerine costs remained the same. Some of the season- to-season variation in cost for each service is due to change in the firms in the sample. However, as shown in Table 2, the long-term trend shows that costs have increased almost steadily over the past 18 seasons before 1974-75. Also, orange picking and hauling costs have increased relative to the delivered-in value of oranges. Table 3 shows the relationship be- tween picking and hauling cost and the per-box delivered-in price of oranges reported by the Florida Canners Association. During the first five seasons reported in Table 3, picking and hauling costs averaged 16.6 percent of the per-box delivered-in price of oranges. During the last five-year period, picking and hauling costs averaged 38.0 percent of the delivered-in price for a box of oranges used in concentrate. In the 1974-75 season, picking and hauling costs represented 41 percent of the delivered-in value of fruit. Table 4 shows show total picking and hauling costs have changed compared with the average reported figure for the 1960-61 through 1964-65 seasons--the base period. With few exceptions, the increases for all types of fruit have been very steady. For the 1974-75 season, orange and grapefruit picking and.hauling costs are about twice the levels during the base period, while tangerine costs are estimated to be 1.7 times the average level reported during the base period. Table 5 shows how the components of total orange picking and hauling costs have changed in absolute magnitude and relative to their base-period levels. Note that picking labor, the largest component, has shown the greatest increase relative to the base period. While Table 2.--Average cost per box for picking and 25 seasons, 1950-51 to 1974-75 hauling citrus fruits, Total picking, Picking & loading loading & hauling Season Sample Haul- loading Season firms ing Grape- Tanger- Grape- Tanger- Orangesfu Oranges is fruit ines fruit ie 1950-51 1951-52 1952-53 1953-54 1954-55 1955-56 1956-57 1957-58 1958-59 1959-60 1960-61 1961-62 1962-63 .1963-64 1964-65 1965-66 1966-67 1967-68 1968-69 1969-70 1970-71 1971-72 1972-73 1973-74 1974-75 No. 9 26 29 37 36 36 34 34 32 33 37 33 32 30 29 27 29 29 29 26 29 25 23 25 21 -- - Cents per 10.31 9.81 9.71 9.61 9.38 9.47 9.27 11.31 11.46 11.23 11.17 10.41 12.94 13.73 11.66 11.96 10.74 13.32 11.98 13.18 13,04 13.61 14.70 15.66 15.36 28.36 28.42 29.12 28.87 28.93 30.52 31.36 33.30 33.30 34.17 34.96 33.79 39.57 43.04 43.43 46.12 46.25 54.09 57.77 61.12 64.86 70.86 82.16 91.08 84.16 18.62 19.51 21.98 20.58 20.91 21.73 23.46 24.09 24.16 25.16 26.69 25.75 28.32 31.47 33.08 37.77 37.65 41.45 42.99 46.98 48.61 52.41 59.11 69.37 67.94 56.93 61.93 59.62 60.86 64.72 66.39 73.96 75.53 74.90 83.68 83.53 81.66 95.97 100.71 102.63 107.47 113.47 118.46 120.55 129.82 134.51 140.46 147.15 158.09 158.23 box - 38.67 38.23 38.83 38.48 38.31 39.99 40.63 44.61 44.76 45.40 46.13 44.20 52.51 56.77 55.09 58.08 56.99 67.41 69.75 74.30 77.90 84.47 98.86 106.74 99.52 28.93 29.32 31.69 30.19 30.29 31.20 32.73 35.40 35.62 36.39 37.86 36.16 41.26 45.20 44.74 49.73 48.39 54.77 54.97 60.16 61.65 66.02 73.81 85.03 83.30 67.24 71.74 69.33 70.47 74.10 75.86 83.23 86.84 86.36 94.91 94.70 92.07 108.91 114.44 114.29 119.43 124.21 131.78 132.53 143.00 147.55 154.07 161.85 173.75 173.59 aData for seasons prior to 1974-75 are from Tilley [5]. Table 3.--Relationship of picking and hauling cost to the per-box price of oranges used for concentrate, 16 seasons, 1960-1975 Delivered-in Estimated per Picking and Season ending per box price box pick and hauling cost as in July for oranges used haul costbfor a percentage of (col. 1) for concentrate oranges delivered-in price (col. 2) (col. 3) (col. 4) Dollars per box Percent 1960 2.54 .45 18 1961 3.47 .46 13 1962 2.26 .44 19 1963 2.71 .56 21 1964 5.25 .57 11 1965 3.37 .55 16 1966 2.28 .58 25 1967 1.29 .57 44 1968 2.76 .67 24 1969 2.70 .70 26 1970 1.94 .74 38 1971 2.07 .78 38 1972 2.91 .84 29 1973 2.36 .97 41 1974 2.58 1.07 41 1975 2.41 1.00 41 p[3, p. 10A]. From Table 1. CCol. 4 (col. 3 + col. 2) X 100. Table 4.--Index of citrus picking and hauling costs, 1960-61 through 1974-75 seasons (1960-61 1964-65 = 100) Total picking, loading and hauling Season index for Oranges Grapefruit Tangerines 1960-61 1961-62 1962-63 1963-64 1964-65 1965-66 1966-67 1967-68 1968-69 1969-70 1970-71 1971-72 1972-73 1973-74 1974-75 91 87 103 Index - 92 88 101 110 109 121 118 133 134 147 150 161 180 207 203 Table 5.--Changes in the cost items that make up estimated total picking and hauling costs for oranges, 15 seasons, 1960-61 through 1974-75 (Index = 1960-61 to 1964-65 average) Season Picking labor c/box Inde; 1960-61 18.90 85 1961-62 19.64 88 1962-63 22.50 101 1963-64 24.24 109 1964-65 26.38 118 1965-66 28.54 128 1966-67 29,53 132 1967-68 33.42 150 1968-69 37.51 168 1969-70 38.54 173 1970-71 38.70 173 1971-72 40.92 183 1972-73 52.60 236 1973-74 57.86 259 1974-75 51.87 232 Other labor C/box 12.52 12. 17 13.29 14.17 13.35 14.43 13. 79 36.96 15.69 17.00 17.99 22.34 22.00 23.10 22.87 Index 96 93 101 108 102 110 105 129 120 130 137 171 1.68 176 1.75 Fuel, oil, repairs, depreciation C/box 8.37 7.56 9.98 10.33 9.72 9.88 8.42 10.88 10.82 12.32 12.75 13.38 15.06 1.6.57 16.53 Index 91 82 109 11.2 106 -107 92 118 118 134 139 146 164 180 180 Administrative and other C/box 6.34 4.83 6.74 8.03 5.64 5.23 5.25 6.15 5.73 6.44 8.'46 7.83 7.20 9.21 8.25 Index 100 76 107 127 89 83 83 97 91 102 134 124 114 146 131 aIncludes supervisory, loaders, drivers, semi-drivers, miscellaneous and payroll taxes and workmen's compensation. Includes licenses, taxes, insurance, supplies, equipment rental, migratory labor expense and miscellaneous costs. 11 Table 4 shows that total picking and hauling costs for oranges in 1974-75 were 195 percent of the base-period level, picking labor has increased to 232 percent of the average in the base period. From the 1960-61 period, total picking and hauling costs for oranges are esti- mated to have increased 53.39 cents and picking labor costs have in- creased 32.97 cents; that is, 62 percent of the increase is accounted for by picking labor cost increases. Labor costs have increased rela- tively more than any other component and also account for a major share of the total absolute increase. SELECTED REFERENCES [l n- .., Earl X-, 1, i, Sourlock, Scott Hedden and William Grierson. i *oderni. -lj I;z" S"ystems for Florida Citrus from Picking to Packing Lini, USDA Marketing Research Report No. 914. ashincgon: U.n Government Printing Office, December 1971, [21 Chern, Wen-Shyong. "Diterwmincation of the Optimal Number, Size and Location ofr Oraige F asking and Processing Plants in Florida." U published H.. chesis. University of Florida, Gainesville, [31 Floridi C.an,:rs A.ss:or.J-cio-n Statistical Summary, 1974-75 Season. [4] Floiida Division of '_uii: tad Vegetable Inspection. 1974-75 Season. _.nal._;/. ionta Wir Haven: 1975. [5] Tilley, Dane S. Estimated Costs of Picking and Hauling Florida Cit-" Fu:ts.. '', Season Food and Resource Economics Departmoni. Economic m information Report 27. Gainesville: University of Florida, May 1975. |