Permanent Link: http://ufdc.ufl.edu/IR00003289/00001
 Material Information
Title: Irrigating With High Salinity Water
Physical Description: Fact Sheet
Creator: Haman, Dorota Z.
Publisher: University of Florida Cooperative Extension Service, Institute of Food and Agriculture Sciences, EDIS
Place of Publication: Gainesville, Fla.
Acquisition: Collected for University of Florida's Institutional Repository by the UFIR Self-Submittal tool. Submitted by Melanie Mercer.
Publication Status: Published
General Note: "Original publication date February 1997. Reviewed April 2009."
General Note: "BUL322"
 Record Information
Source Institution: University of Florida Institutional Repository
Holding Location: University of Florida
Rights Management: All rights reserved by the submitter.
System ID: IR00003289:00001

This item is only available as the following downloads:

AE09100 ( PDF )

Full Text


Dorota Z. Haman2 1. This document is BUL322, one of a series of the Agricultural and Biological Engineering Department, Florida Cooperative Extension Service, Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences, University of Florida. Original publication date February 1997. Reviewed April 2009. Visit the EDIS Web Site at http://edis.ifas.ufl.edu. 2. Dorota Z. Haman, Associate Professor, Agricultural and Biological Engineering, Gainesville, FL, Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences, University of Florida, Gainesville, 32611. In humid areas such as Florida, salinity concerns are different than in arid areas since large amounts of rainfall will wash out salts concentrating in the soil profile. However, management may be required close to the coast where groundwater salt content is frequently high. Salinity management also may be required during extended drought periods. In arid climates, where most of the crop water requirement is supplied through irrigation and the water often contains large amounts of dissolved salts, salinity control is frequently a major objective of irrigation management. Irrigation with various types of waste water (municipal, industrial, etc.) can also create salinity hazards or toxicity problems. Above certain concentrations, sodium, chloride, boron, and other ions are toxic to many plants. Since water is a very good solvent, all irrigation waters contain some dissolved salts. Electrical conductivity is a reliable index of salt concentration in the water. A conductivity of 1 dS/m (decisiemens per meter) indicates a salt concentration of approximately 700 ppm (parts per million)(Soil and Container Media Electrical Conductivity / IFAS Circular 1092). This value will vary to some extent with temperature and type of salts. Salinity is also frequently expressed in mg/l (milligrams per liter). The number of mg/l is equivalent to ppm. Decisiemens per meter is the SI unit for conductivity. The common English unit is millimhos per centimeter (mmho/cm). One dS/m is equal to one mmho/cm. The salt concentration in the plant root zone is usually higher than that of irrigation water. Salts are concentrated due to evaporation and plant transpiration which selectively remove water leaving salts in the soil. These salts can be removed from the plant root zone by leaching. Salinity restricts the availability of water to plants by lowering the total water potential in the soil. Salinity also has an impact on crop physiology and yield. Visible injury can occur at high salinity levels. Usually, crop yield is independent of salt concentration when salinity is below some threshold level, then yield gradually decreases to zero as the salt concentration increases to the level which cannot be tolerated by a given crop. This relationship is presented graphically in Figure 1


Irrigating With High Salinity Water 2 A general function of yield response to salinity. Various crops show different sensitivities to different salinity levels. Some crops are much more tolerant than others. Plants are generally divided into four salinity rating groups: sensitive, moderately sensitive, moderately tolerant, and tolerant (Table 1). Threshold and zero yield salinity levels for four salinity groups. dS/m dS/m Sensitive 1.4 8.0 Moderately Sensitive 3.0 16.0 Moderately Tolerant 6.0 24.0 Tolerant 10.0 32.0 (adopted from Jensen, 1980) Example of crops in four salinity rating groups. almond alfalfa red beet sugarbeet applebroccolisafflower cotton avocadocabbageolive date palm beantomatosoybean bermudagrass carrotlettucewheat grapefruitcorn ryegrass orangecucumberwheatgrass lemongrapewildrye okrapeanut onionpotato strawberryradish peachrice plum sugarcane (adopted from Jensen, 1980) Table 2 lists examples of crops in each of those tolerance rating groups. In saline conditions, soil water availability to the crop can be accomplished through several strategies such as; leaching salts from the soil profile, maintaining high soil water content in the root zone, selecting more salt tolerant plants, improving drainage in the field, changing irrigation method, and adjusting planting practices in some cropping systems. In arid climates irrigation must supply all water requirements of the crop for the growing season. Additional water must be applied to remove the salts from the root zone in order to avoid a build-up of salts which will exceed the threshold level for a given crop and result in yield reduction. The amount of additional water is usually expressed as a leaching fraction which is a dimensionless number. The leaching requirement for sprinkler and surface irrigation can be expressed by ( Equation 1 ). where: LF -leaching fraction (dimensionless) Dd -depth of water drained (inches or mm) Di depth of water applied through irrigation (inches or mm) Eci electrical conductivity of irrigation water (mmho/cm or dS/m) ECd -electrical conductivity of drainage water (mmho/cm or dS/m) In humid areas the rainfall partially reduces the salinity problems due to irrigation with saline water. Total depth of water applied is a sum of irrigation depth and the rainfall depth minus runoff as seen in, Equation 2


Irrigating With High Salinity Water 3 where: Di -depth of irrigation (inches or mm) Dr -depth of rainfall minus runoff (inches or mm) Da -depth of the total water application (inches or mm) The weighted average electrical conductivity for the water applied through irrigation and the rainfall which percolates through the root zone must be taken into consideration. The weighted average electrical conductivity of the total water applied can be calculated from Equation 3 : In humid climates such as Florida's, there are many large rainfall events. Most of the water infiltrates quickly due to the sandy texture of the soils. During the rainy season the depth of rainfall in Equation 3 is much larger than the depth of irrigation, and the electrical conductivity of the weighted average is low. As a result, salts and fertilizer nutrients are washed from the root zone before salinity concentration can significantly increase. However, salinity may be a problem during extended dry periods when water is applied only through irrigation. During this time, an additional amount of water should be applied with each irrigation event to assure salt removal from the plant root zone. The amount of additional irrigation water can be calculated using Equation 1. Example 1: Calculate the leaching requirement for broccoli during an extended dry weather period in Florida (assume that all the water requirement is supplied through irrigation) knowing: Amount of water that must be applied to fulfill crop water requirement (CR) is 1 inch (25 mm) per irrigation event. Irrigation water conductivity is 1.5 dS/m. From Table 2, we know that broccoli is a moderately sensitive crop which will be affected by the soil saturated extract salinity level ECe in the root zone higher than 3.0 dS/m (Table 1). This will allow us to calculate LF (Equation 1). The total water applied through the irrigation system during each irrigation event (Di) is the croop water requirement (CR) plus a drinage depth (Dd) due to the leaching requirement: Di = CR + Dd. Using Equation 1: LF = Dd/Di = ECi/(5ECe ECi) = 1.5/13.5 = 0.11 and since: Dd = Di x LF and Dd = Di x LF and Di = CR+Dd Dd = (CR + Dd) x LF = (CR + Dd) x 0.11 Dd = 0.11 + 0.11 Dd 0.89 Dd = 0.11 Dd = 0.12 in Di = 1 + 0.12 = 1.12 in. A simple check of calculations can be performed using equation (1): Dd/Di = LF 0.12/1.12 = 0.11 Answer: During dry season, the total amount of irrigation water which must be applied during each irrigation event in order to maintain the soil salinity level below 3.0 dS/m is 1.12 inch (28 mm). From this total amount, 0.12 inch (3 mm) will drain due to the required leaching fraction LF = 0.11. Due to the continous high water content in the root zone under microirrigation, higher salt content can be tolerated in the soil than under sprinkler irrigation without yield reduction. Equation 4 is used to calculate leaching fraction under microirrigation.


Irrigating With High Salinity Water 4 where: Max ECe can be found in Table 3. LF calculated from Equation 4 can be used in Equation 1 to calculate Dd (depth of additional water to be applied). Under high frequency irrigation (microirrigation) salts that accumulate below the emitters can be almost continuously flushed. When LF > 0.1, it is recommended that additional water is used for flushing to keep salts from concentrating in the plant root zone. The minimum ECe is a useful parameter for estimating the effect of microirrigation on crop yield. If ECi <= min ECe, there will be essentially no reduction in yield. Reclamation is defined as a procedure required to restore productivity loss of the soil due to severe salinity problems. The only proven solution to a high concentration of soluble salts in a soil profile is leaching. Leaching requires good drainage so that the salts can be removed from the field. Depending on the condition, if the natural drainage is not adequate, artificial drains (surface or subsurface) must be constructed. A general rule is that to remove 80% of soluble salts initially present in a soil profile, the depth of water equal to the depth of this profile must be applied. A reclamation should be done by application of water over the entire area as uniformly as possible through flooding or sprinkling. Jensen, M.E. 1980. Design and Operation of Farm Irrigation Systems. An ASAE Monograph. American Society of Agricultural Engineers, 2950 Niles Road, St. Joseph, MI 49085. James, L.G. 1988. Principles of Farm Irrigation System Design. John Wiley & Sons, Inc. New York. Hanlon, E.A., B.L. McNeal and G. Kidder. 1993. Soil and Container Media Electrical Conductivity Interpretation. Florida Cooperative Extension Service, IFAS, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL. Circular 1092. Available online: http://edis.ifas.ufl.edu/SS117.


Irrigating With High Salinity Water 5 Specific minimum and maximum balues of ECe for Various crops. ECe,dS/m ECe,dS/m Crop Min1 Max2 Crop Min1 Max2 Field crops Cotton 7.7 27Corn 1.7 10 Sugar beets 7.0 24Flax 1.7 10 Sorghum 6.8 13Broadbeans 1.5 12 Soybean 5.0 10Cowpeas 1.3 8.5 Sugarcane 1.7 19Beans 1.0 6.5 Fruit and nut crops Date palm 4.0 32Apricot 1.6 6 Fig, olive 2.7 14Grape 1.5 12 Pomegranate 2.7 14Almond 1.5 7 Grapefruit 1.8 8Plum 1.5 7 Orange 1.7 8Blackberry 1.5 6 Lemon 1.7 8Boysenberry 1.5 6 Apple, pear 1.7 8Avocado 1.3 6 Walnut 1.7 8Raspberry 1.0 5.5 Peach 1.7 6.5Strawberry 1.0 4 Vegetable crops Zucchini squash 4.7 15Sweet corn 1.7 10 Beets 4.0 15Sweet potato 1.5 10.5 Broccoli 2.8 13.5Pepper 1.5 8.5 Tomato 2.5 12.5Lettuce 1.3 8 Cucumger 2.5 10Radish 1.2 9 Cantaloupe 2.2 16Onion 1.2 7.5 Spinach 2.0 15Carrot 1.0 8 Cabbage 1.8 12Beans 1.0 6.5 Potato 1.7 10Turnip 0.9 12 after Ayers and Wescott (1985). 1Minimum ECe does not reduce yield. 2Maximum ECe reduces yield to zero.