Preliminary screening of emulsifiable toxaphene concentrates


Material Information

Preliminary screening of emulsifiable toxaphene concentrates
Physical Description:
5 p. : ; 27 cm.
Sparr, B. I
United States -- Bureau of Entomology and Plant Quarantine
U.S. Dept. of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Administration, Bureau of Entomology and Plant Quarantine
Place of Publication:
Washington, D.C
Publication Date:


Subjects / Keywords:
Toxaphene   ( lcsh )
Insecticides   ( lcsh )
bibliography   ( marcgt )
federal government publication   ( marcgt )
non-fiction   ( marcgt )


Includes bibliographical references (p. 5).
General Note:
Caption title.
General Note:
General Note:
"September 1952."
Statement of Responsibility:
B.I. Sparr.

Record Information

Source Institution:
University of Florida
Rights Management:
All applicable rights reserved by the source institution and holding location.
Resource Identifier:
aleph - 030339292
oclc - 780665019
System ID:

Full Text
September 1952 E-847

STAT United States Department of Agriculture
Agricultural Research Administration
Bureau of Entomology and Plant Quarantine


B. I. Sparr-i
Division of Insects Affecting Man and Animals

In the application of toxaphene emulsions by power spraying, the
stability of the emulsion presents only a minor problem. However,
where the stock is dipped in a vat the stability of the emulsion is of
major importance. Experiments were therefore conducted to develop
emulsifiable toxaphene concentrates that would yield stable emulsions.
A method for screening candidate concentrates containing different
emulsifiers is described, and the results of screening some formula-
tions are reported. Another consideration was the use of agricultural
products in insecticide formulations; hence the testing of turpentine and
pine oil as solvents.

Formulations Tested

Three types of formulations were tested:

(1) Three experimental concentrates containing 50 percent of toxa-
phene, 10 percent of emulsifier, and 40 percent of one of the following
solvents: kerosene, pine oil (sp. gr. 0.9358 at 15.6/15.6C.), or
turpentine (all percentages by weight).
(2) Three commercial concentrates:
(A) Toxaphene 65, aliphatic hydrocarbon solvent 25, alkylaryl
poplyethylene glycol 7.5, and alkylaryl sulfonate 2.5 percent.

1I/ Report of a study made under the Research and Marketing Act of

2/ The author is indebted to H. F. Beckman, R. C. Bushland, H. V.
Claborn, and R. D. Radeleff for advice and occasional assistance in these


(B) To:xarhcne 60, aliphatic hydrocarbon solvent 22, aromatic
hydrocarbon solvent 5, alkylaryl polyethylene glycol 5, poly-
ethylene glycol ester 5, and polyoxyethylene sorbitol oleate-
laurate 3 percent.
(C) Toxaphenre 50, alkylaryl polyethylene glycol 4, phthalic
glycerol ajkyd resin 6, epichlorhydrin 0.2, and petroleum
distillate 39.8.
(3) A miscellaneous group of formulations suggested by various
emulsifier manufacturers.

'ihe specific gravities at 25 C., of the solutions of toxaphene in the
experimental concentrates were determined, and for this work were con-
sidered as constant with respect to temperature. The volume containing
5 grams of toxaphene fcr each solution was used for making the test

Preparation of Emulsions

The following procedure was adopted for preparing the emulsions:

(,re grai;i of emulsifier was weighed into a 50-ml. beaker. The
volume of the kerosene, pine oil, or turpentine solution containing
5 grams (f toxaphene was pipetted into the beaker and the mixture
stirred to dissolve the emulsifier. When necessary, gentle heat was
applied. Distilled water was then added slowly until an oil-in-water
emulsion was formed. This emulsion was poured into a 500-ml. grad-
uated cylinder and diluted with distilled water to 500 ml. to produce a
1-percent toxaphene emulsion. It was then poured into a 1-liter
Erlenmeyer flask, stoppered, and shaken for 30 seconds. Into each
of five calibrated vials, 9.7 cm. long and 2.4 cm. inside diameter,
15 ml. of the freshly shaken emulsion was poured. The emulsion was
further diluted to contain 0.5 percent of toxaphene by adding to each vial
an equal volume of distilled water, tap water (containing 14 grains of
calcium carbonate per gallon), 2-percent acetic acid, ammonium
hydroxide, or sodium chloride. The vials were placed in racks and left
open to the air.

Observations and Screening Criteria

The emulsions were examined after 1 hour, 1 day, and I week.
SObservations were made on the extent of bottom creaming as measur..d
with a millimeter rule, the degree of top clearing, any phase sejr'atio .
the ease of re-emulsification of the separated oil or ease of resus!i'nsion
of the cream, and the discernibility of resuspended particles when the
vials were illuminated by flashlight.

Since for use in dippir' v its a st ablIe emuulsion with a slow rate of
creaming was desirable, the follow i criteria were established fo
choosing the more promising formulations:

(1) The emulsifier was soluble in the toxaphene solution.
(2) No bottom creaming, or only a trace, appeared in any vial at
the end of a week.
(3) There was no oil separation in any of the aqueous media, except
the 1-percent sodium chloride system, at the end of a week.
(4) The cream was readily redispersed on inversion of the vial.
(5) Upon illumination of the vial after inversion, there were no
individually discernible ,.rrticles.
(6) There was either no top clearing or only slight clearing,

Since no pine-oil concentrates conformed to criterion (2), the pine-
oil emulsions chosen for further consideration showed 1 mm. or less
of bottom creaming, but met the other criteria.


Experimental concentrates. --In the course of testing the experi-
mental concentrates 103 emulsifiers were tried. The following were
found to give satisfactory formulations with at least one type of toxa-
phene emulsion, according to the criteria outlined above.

I Emulsifier

Ahco RL 382 (Arnold, Hoffman & Co.) -- -
Ahcowet Anhydrous RS (Arnold,
Hoffman & Co.) - - - - - - - -
Antarox D-100 (General Dyestuff Corp.) - -
Chlorsol (E. F. Drew & Co.) - - - - -
Duponol G (E. I. du Pont de Nemours & Co.) -
Emcol H-77 (Emulsol Corp.)- - - - -
Emulside 75 (Van Dyk & Co.)-- --- - -
Emulsifier 803-M (E. F. Drew & Co.) - -
Emulsifier R (Monsanto Chemical Co) - -
Nopco Agrimul 60 (Nopco Chemical Co.)- -
Nopco 1219-A (Nopco Chemical Co.)- - -
Nopco HBX-2 (Nopco Chemical Co.) -----
Skil 181-A (Gallowhur Chemical Corp.) - -
Tenlo 400 (Griffin Chemical Co.)- - - -
Trex 45 (Griffin Chemical Co.)- - - - -


Kerosene and turpentine
Pine oil
Pine oil and turpentine
Pine oil
Kerosene and turpentine
Kerosene and turpentine

Trex 80 (Griffin Chemical Co.)-

- - - - Turpentine


The kerosene-type concentrates containing Emulsifier R, Tenlo 400,
or Duponol G were stable in 1-percent sodium chloride solution for a
week. Many of the concentrates that did not meet these criteria may be
suitable for other purposes, such as use in sprays.

Commercial concentrates. --The amounts of bottom creaming in
emulsions prepared from the three commercial concentrates after they
had stood for 7 days are shown below.

Diluent A B C

Distilled water Trace 1 mm. 1 mm.
Sodium chloride Broken Trace Broken
Acetic acid Broken 2 mm. 2 mm.
Ammonium hydroxide 2 mm 1 mm. 3 mm.
Tap water 1 mm. Trace 3 mm.

Emulsions A and C showed nearly complete top clearing and particles
were discernible upon resuspension.
It is apparent that concentrates A and C do not meet the criteria
established. Except for extent of creaming, concentrate B does meet
these criteria.
This report does not constitute a condemnation of any of these prod-
ucts. Two of them are being used extensively and successfully in Texas,
although there have been reports (Radeleff and Bushland 1950) of cattle
killed by dipping in vats in which such emulsions had deteriorated.

Miscellaneous formulations. --Of 23 miscellaneous formulations
tested, 19 were either recommended by emulsifier producers or supplied
by them for evaluation; the remaining 4 were arbitrarily compounded in
the laboratory. Forirulations containing the following emulsifiers and
solvents were found to be satisfactory.

Emulsifier Solvent
Percent Percent

Emcol H-66 35 Deodorized kerosene 15
Antarox A-200 50 None
Antarox B-29U 5 None
Antarox B-201 3) Butyl Cellosolve 15
Ahcowet RS 50 None
60 None
Ahco R1L-382 16 Kerosene 2t'
G-891( 'I (\tlas Powder Co.) 50 None
45 Kerosene 10

- 5 -

All formulations except those containing Antarox A-200 ( r Ahc(
RL-382 formed solubilized systems when diluted with water. The
degree of transparency varied, but the most opaque materials showed
no sign of creaming at the end of a week in the vials. Formulations
containing Ahcowet RS and Ahco RL-382 broke in 1-percent sodium
chloride solution.

Experiments in miniature vats. --The validity of this method for
selecting formulations for further development has been supported by
two experiments conducted in miniature (7-allon) concrete dipping vats.
In the first experiment' four formulations prepared in the laboratory and
two commercial concentrates (A and C) were used. Under similar con-
ditions of vat-charging methods, climate, contamination, and time, the
laboratory-prepared formulations showed less deterioration than the
commercial formulations.
Two of the miscellaneous solubilizable concentrates were included
in these tests. Although they showed no oil separation or gumminess,
one of them developed a thick pellicle at its surface. The other concen-
trate showed evidence of creaming, but upon agitation the cream was


These experiments indicate that certain combinations of emulsifier,
solvent, and toxaphene produce emulsifiable concentrates that are more
stable than some commercial formulations when diluted and held under
laboratory conditions. It is to be emphasized that most of the results
were obtained in laboratory glassware. The confirmatory tests with
emulsions held in miniature vats do not represent actual field observa-
tions. However, the formulations that performed better under those
limited experimental conditions merit further testing in ranch vats.

Literature Cited

Radeleff, R. D., and Bushland, R. C.
1950. Acute toxicity of chlorinated insecticides applied to livestock.
Jour. Econ. Ent. 43(3): 358-364.

3/ Conducted by R. D. Radeleff unpublishedl report).


IIi3 1262 09239 6307II I
3 1262 09239 6307