Authenticity in Indigenous Cinema: Colonial Inscriptions and Native Revisions

Material Information

Authenticity in Indigenous Cinema: Colonial Inscriptions and Native Revisions
Lapin, Jesse
Publication Date:
Physical Description:
Undergraduate Honors Thesis


Subjects / Keywords:
Actors ( jstor )
Death ( jstor )
Indigenous peoples ( jstor )
Motion picture industry ( jstor )
Movies ( jstor )
Narratives ( jstor )
Native Americans ( jstor )
Nazism ( jstor )
Westerns ( jstor )
White people ( jstor )


"Authenticity in Indigenous Cinema: Colonial Inscriptions and Native Revisions" traces the history of indigenous representation in North American film culture--particularly as it concerns discourses of authenticity--from the birth of cinema in the late 1800s to the spate of indigenous-made films in the late twentieth and early twenty-first centuries. I divide my thesis into three chapters: "Mythic Images: The American West and the Indian," "Ethnographic Fantasies and Sympathetic Stirrings," and "Re-envisioning Indigenous Authenticity." The first chapter contextualizes the Western's use of the indigenous as an emanation and symbol of the harsh Western landscape and its attendant mythos, a usage epitomized by the films of John Ford. The second chapter examines the relationship between the indigenous and the birth of the documentary film form in Robert Flaherty's "Nanook of the North" (1922). This chapter also explores the possibilities for more humanizing representations through a discussion of H.P. Carver's "The Silent Enemy" (1930). The final chapter focuses on several examples of revisionist representations by indigenous and sympathetic non-indigenous filmmakers. Essential to my thesis is how filmmakers in the dominant culture construct authenticity through the invocation of the indigenous and how the indigenous and their allies attempt to reinscribe indigenous authenticity.

Record Information

Source Institution:
University of Florida Institutional Repository
Holding Location:
University of Florida
Rights Management:
All rights reserved by the source institution and holding location.


This item is only available as the following downloads:

Full Text


Authenticity in Indigenous Cinema: Colonial Inscriptions and Native Revisions by Jesse Lapin The University of Florida Department of English November 2013 ! !


Table of Contents Introduction 1 1 Mythic Images: The American West and the Indian 14 2 Ethnographic Fantasies and Sympathetic Stirrings 29 3 Re envisioning Indigenous Authenticity 41 Conclusion 63 Filmography 67 Works Cited 6 9


INTRODUCTION Indigenous and non indigenous filmmakers have long struggled to reinscribe dominant cultures' imagery and narrative representations of indigenous people on film with more humane depictions that reflect the reality of indigenous history and con temporary life Given that indigenous populations so often suffer from economic marginalization, poverty, lack of access to social services, and discrimination, acquiring the skills and resources necessary for film production has posed a significant challe nge for indigenous filmmakers, to say nothing of the creative and ethical challenges inherent in historically and culturally revisionist filmmaking. These difficulties notwithstanding, indigenous filmmakers around the world have produced works that serious ly challenge dominant con ceptions of indigeneity and the popular imagination's construction of indigenous history and peoples. Non indigenous filmmakers sympathetic to the project of respectful and humane representation have also attempted to counter the r eductive inscription of indigeneity in film. The works of these filmmakers strive to wrest claims of authenticity concerning representations of the indigenous away from the commercial mode of filmmaking. Dominant cultures have traditionally turned to the i ndigenous as a kind of timeless wellspring of authenticity, so indigenous filmmakers and their allies have a particular stake in reclaiming and re inscribing authenticity to express their own experiences and idioms. Mainstream cinema in the United States i nvokes the indigenous in a variety of ways. No single stereotype or image consistently sums up the history of representation. In the Western genre, the indigenous often figure as "savage Indians" who threaten westward expansion and white settlement. This t hreat is epitomized in the possibility of


! miscegenation, a sexual invasion and corruption of whiteness framed as a fate worse than death. 1 The Western genre also features the indigenous as comic relief, or as a more benign threat to westward expansion as p assive obstacles to progress, or as the allegedly sympathetic, but often no less simplistic and racialized, hopeless and pitiful victim destined for death. Though varied in its representations, the Western always narrowly frames the indigenous as a relic of the past pathologically in conflict with modernity symbolized by white expansion and industrial advancement. John O'Connor points out that in t he cycles of Indian picturesat times a romanticized, even glorified, image could coexist with the vicious o ne" (28). Conflicting but equally reductive and pathological representations of the indigenous predate the cinema. Throughout the historical record of contact with indigenous peoples, European observers produced a pattern of diverse, often contradictory re presentation. In the early explorat ion and settlement of Canada, views [of the indigenous] were ambivalent to say the least, ranging from the noble savage' of lawyer historian Marc Lescarbot (ca. 1570 1642) to the brutish, wild and stupid' people portra yed by the RÂŽcollet, Louis Hennepin (1626 1705)" (Dickason 123). By the late nineteenth century, various and contradictory concepts of the indigenous were accepted as common knowledge and codified in historical texts. An 1886 textbook entitled American His tory for Schools expresses the schizophrenic view of the indigenous that pervades cinematic representations: !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! # !$%!&'()!*+(,+-./!-0*. 1 234.44.5!6787!9-'&&',:!'4!)24,!-.4;2%4'3(.!&2-!;2;+(0-'<'%=! !! )'4*.=.%0,'2%!04!0!>&0,.!?2-4.!,:0%!5.0,:7@!A:.!*2%*.;,!0;;.0-4!'%!:'4!.0-(B!$%5'0%! &'()4/!3+,! !"#$%&'("$)*$+$,+(&)-$ C#D#EF!&.0,+-.4!',4!)24,!%2,2-'2+4!0%5!'%&(+.%,'0(! %0--0,'G.!+40=.7!H2:%!I2-5!.*:2.4!9-'&&',:J4!&.0-!2&!-0*. 1 )'K'%=!'%!:'4!&'()4/!%2,03(B .(+/#0)+0"$ C#DLDF!0%5! !"#$.#+'0"#'1 !C#DEMF7


! L They [the natives] were mostly grave and taciturn, hospitable, generous, brave, and possessed of wonderful self control in both bearing pain and repressing all show of joy or sorrow. On the other hand, they were often deceitful and treacherous, always cunning and suspicious, cruel, improvident, and indisposed to labor except in war and the chase. They never forgot either a kindness or an injury They were given to few words, but their language was full of eloquence. Their sight and hearing were remarkably acute. Nothing escaped their observation, and they were singularly sagacious in drawing conclusions from signs which Europeans would not no tice at all. For the hunting grounds and graves of their ancestors they cherished a patriotic attachment. (Quackenbos 19) In cinematic representations of the indigenous and their antecedents, the colonial culture projects on the indigenous whatever attri butes and behaviors that serve the racial supremacist fantasy and expansionist agenda, leading to necessarily amorphous and incoherent characterizations of the indigenous. Beyond the Western, ethnographic films, most prominent among them Nanook of the Nort h (1922), similarly enclose the indigenous in a temporal historical episteme, rendering the indigenous as artifacts of human simplicity and authenticity. In the ethnographic film, documenting the indigenous offers a window into the pre modern that was inev itably swept away by progress. This construct ion is essentially romantic and rarely concerned with the veracity of what appears on screen. The ethnographic film often takes for granted that the indigenous people appearing on film are representative of the typical indigenous lifestyle at the time of filming and that this lifestyle represents a continuation of ancient customs and behaviors.


! N Many films in the later twentieth century attempted to portray a more positive image of the indigenous, representing Na tive Americans as deeply spiritual beings with an unbreakable connection to the natural world. Films such as Dances with Wolves (1990), Pocahontas (1995), and even Avatar (2009) fit into this category as visions of the indigenous symptomatic of what Robe rt Baird calls the "New Age Indian wannabe syndrome" (167). Avatar is not explicitly about Native Americans, but the humanoid alien people in the film bear a remarkable resemblance to the North American indigenous of the cultural imaginary. The invocation of Native American figures is central to the film's clumsy anti colonial allegory. These New Age indigenous films abandon the conventional territory of the Western without challenging the fundamental cultural assumptions that characterize the genre. No lon ger concerned with justifying colonial settlement and expansion against the backdrop of the mythic West, they lament the destruction of indigenous peoples and cultures but fail to supplant or challenge white supremacy or the narrative centrality of the whi te hero. In films, such as The Silent Enemy (1930) 49 th Parallel (1941), and Atanarjuat: The Fast Runner (2001), filmmakers of both indigenous and non indigenous backgrounds have countered popular representations of the indigenous in several ways: 1) the characterization of indigenous people as individuals whose appearance, customs, and actions are not a priori and pathologically determined by their ethnicity; 2) narratives that reclaim authentic history via either pre contact settings and plotlines devoid of the explicit colonial presence or contemporary settings featuring characters of indigenous descent who challenge the status of the indigenous as anthropological artifacts trapped in the past; 3) unconventional narrative structures and technical choices that challenge the


! E dominant mode of filmmaking, thereby rejecting the form and context of popular representation. These filmmakers seek to re envision the history and meaning of indigenous life through cinema. Yet, commercial film culture has not yet acce pted or embraced their revisions in full. This honors thesis originates in an effort to take stock of the different forms of cinematic representation of indigenous peoples in North America. I focus on the most influential examples of the dominant culture's inscription of the indigenous in cinema, before shifting the focus to a group of films ranging from the highly obscure to the widely acclaimed that counter this inscription. Representations of the aboriginal peoples of Australia, the indigenous of South a nd Central America, and indigenous peoples scattered through hundreds of locales throughout the world merit analysis, but the scope of my inquiry is necessarily limited by space. Moreover, the cinema of North America is especially fertile ground for examin ing representations of the indigenous. U.S. and Canadian cinemas invite analysis for several reasons. First, the quantity of production is key. This is truer for the U.S., whose pr olific studio system produced an abundance of indigenous representations on film, mostly in the genre of the Western, in the first half century of cinema. Thomas Schatz describes the Hollywood studio era as, a period when various social, industrial, technological, economic, and aesthetic forces struck a delicate balancethrough four decades to provide a consistent system of production and consumption, a set of formalized creative practices and constraints, and thus a body of work with a uniform style" (8). The productivity and stylistic consistency of this era propelled the "Holl ywood Indian" into its status as the archetypical form of indigenous representation, as a kind of inscriptive default. We still understand


! M representations of the indigenous across the globe as flowing with or against the Hollywood stream of representation. This is especially true when we consider indigenous filmmakers and their sympathetic peers in the dominant culture. Secondly, the U.S. and Canadian cinemas have a special investment in the indigenous as a source of filmic authenticity. Native American per formances were among the first filmed images. 2 The indigenous were literally present at the birth of cinema, and indigenous representations abounded throughout the silent era. 3 The indigenous are also essential to the genesis of the documentary form, as ma ny credit Nanook of the North (1922), an ethnographic film about an Inuit family in Canada, as the first true documentary. No cinematic form or genre is more explicitly invested in authenticity than the documentary. The dominant culture's investment in ind igeneity as a currency of authenticity uniquely positions indigenous filmmakers and their sympathizers in the United States and Canada to challenge and revise indigenous representations through a discourse of authenticity. Before proceeding to a discussi on and analysis of individual films, the topic requires a review and definition of a number of key terms that will recur frequently. First, any discussion of the indigenous necessitates a working definition of the term. Dispute and controver sy surround que stions of who is indigenous. Indeed, official membership in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


! X and acceptance by an indigenous community or tribe depends upon much more than mere self identification and often involves layers of bureaucracy and arbitration. The United Nations Permanent Forum on Indigenous Issues offers a broad definition of indigenous peoples: "the descendantsof those who inhabited a country or a geographical region at the time when people of different cultures or ethnic origins arrived. The new arrivals later became dominan t through conquest, occupation, settlement or other means" ("Indigenous Peoples, Indigenous Voices" 1). Henceforward, my use of the term "indigenous" should be understood in the context of the UN Forum's definition. Attempting to define authenticity engen ders even greater confusion and ambiguity, but we can define some basic assumptions. In standard usage, authenticity denotes truth, reality, originality, conformity to factual consensus, and all such related concepts. Authenticity describes the condition o f adherence to existential truth, of the symbol's fidelity to the reality it purports to represent. This understanding naturally necessitates locating the parameters of true existence. Sigmund Freud provides a psychological foundation for defining authenti city. Freud located the truth of existence in his metaphorical contest between Eros and Thanatos, where the drive for life and the preservation of the species conflicts with the drive for destruction and death. The individual identity is the product of con stant conflict and mediation between these two forces. In his critique of existentialist jargon, Theodor Adorno locates authenticity in the confrontation of personal mortality: "When, by anticipation, one becomes free for one's own death, one is liberated from one's lostness in those possibilities which may accidentally thrust themselves upon one; and one is liberated in such a way that for the first time one can authentically understand and choose among the factical possibilities


! Y lying ahead of that possib ility which is not to be o utstripped" ( Jargon 159). The major world religions' fixation on death and the afterlife exemplified by Abrahamic and Dharmic theologies that exhort the faithful to live their lives in preparation for death and for an existence be yond their physical/temporal presence on Earth provides further evidence supporting the notion that authenticity is best understood as an obsession with mortality. Moreover, societies tend to fetishize the past as a mythic history either glorious or shamef ul/savage as befitting present purposes and ideologies. The past is authentic because it is the final product of the passage of time, and it is the unavoidable and foregone death of all the past's participants that lends weight and meaning to the passage o f time. Film documents time and is always, by the nature of the medium, a record of the past, even if the film in question is a narrative piece set in the present or future. Photography and its kinetic descendant, film, have a connection to representatio nal authenticity unrivaled by the other fine arts and modes of representational production. "Photography and cinemaare discoveries that satisfy, once and for all and in its very essence, our obsession with realism," (161) writes AndrÂŽ Bazin, arguing that previous to the invention of the photographic process, practitioners of other art forms, particularly painting, were obsessed with realism. Photography reproduces reality through a chemical process that no artist, despite their skill or devotion, could mat ch in its objectivity. 4 Therefore, photography's invention and ascendance liberated the non photographic arts from their obsession with realism, allowing them to represent and !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! N !V0<'%!*2%4'5.-4!23R.*,'G',B!P.B!:.-./!0%5!%2,!G.-'4')'(',+5.!2-!S+0(',B7!A:.! ;:2,2*:.)'*0(!;-2*.44!.K*'4.4!,:.!4+3R.*,'G.!:+)0%!.(.).%,!2&!')0=.!-.;-25+*,'2%! '%:.-.%,!'%!;0'%,'%=!2-!4*+(;,+-.7!V0<'% !0-=+.4!;:2,2=-0;:'*!,.*:%2(2=B!0*,+0((B! (0=4!3.:'%5!;0'%,'%=!'%!,-+,:&+((B!-.;-.4.%,'%=!-.0(',B/!;0-,'*+(0-(B!'%!*2%4'5.-0,'2%! 2&!*2(2-/!3+,!,:.!;-2*.44!'4!)2-.!');2-,0%,!,:0%!,:.!S+0(',B!2&!,:.!-.4+(,7!


! D interpret the world around them in new and exciting ways. A photograph is a prec ise documentation of an instant in time and space. Film is a less precise documentation of the motion and alteration of space through time. Russian director Andrei Tarkovsky describes filmmaking as "sculpting in time," locating cinema's essential nature in the rhythm of the appearance of images in the frame, rather than in the content of the images themselves (119) The imprinted temporality of cinema distinguishes it from the still image. Film is less precise than photography due to its increased element al complexity and the editing process, which alters the spectator's understanding of what appears on screen. Nevertheless, both photography and film capture a kind of visual reality and preserve it The aesthetic immortality of the photographic image fulfi lls the impulse to maintain the self beyond physical death. 5 Bazin suggests, "[i]f the plastic arts were put under psychoanalysis, the practice of embalming the dead might turn out to be a fundamental factor in their creation. The process might reveal that at the origin of painting and sculpture there lies a mummy complex" (159). The arts attempt to preserve the living beyond death through accurate representation. Photography and film achieve objective representation, satisfying the requirements for realism where other media necessarily fall short, earning these new forms an innate authenticity. Despite, or perhaps because of, film's natural authenticity, various filmmakers and film movements throughout history have attempted to craft styles that are suppos edly !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! E !A:'4!'4!0.4,:.,'*!&+(&'(().%,!2&!,:.!5.4'-.!&2-!' ))2-,0(',B/!%2,!4;'-',+0(!2-! .)2,'2%0(7!$!52!%2,!).0%!,2!4+==.4,!,:0,!&'()!;-2G'5.4!4;'-',+0(Z.)2,'2%0(! 40,'4&0*,'2%!,0%,0)2+%,!,2!,:.!-.('='2+4!.K;.-'.%*.7!I'()!2;.-0,.4!2%!0!)2-.! 4+;.-&'*'0(!(.G.(/!,:2+=:!*.-,0'%!.K*.;,'2%4!2&!,-0%4*.%5.%*.!)0B!3.!234.-G .5!'%!,:.! :'=:.4,!0*:'.G.).%,4!2&!,:.!0-,7


! #[ more authentic and realistic compared to the normative style of the cinema that they are challenging. In the 1920s, Dziga Vertov and other Soviet filmmakers introduced a concept of cinema called kino pravda, literally "film truth," wherein the filmmak er documented scenes of everyday life involving non actors going about their business, sometimes without the knowledge that they were being filmed. In films, such as Man with a Movie Camera (1929), Vertov experimented with form, breaking with the continuou s editing technique and traditional narrative form of Hollywood and pre revolutionary Russian cinema in favor of a non linear montage technique. Kino pravda influenced many film movements around the world in the decades after its formulation. These movemen ts, including cinÂŽma vÂŽritÂŽ in France, Direct Cinema in the United States, and Italian Neorealism, invested in a stylistic concept of authenticity expressed through the use of several techniques: black and white cinematography often shot with hand held cam eras, location shooting and scorn for the artifice of the studio, the use of non professional actors, and a thematic focus on "real" people, often working class subjects or ethnographic subjects. Other film movements and directors have constructed aesthe tics of authenticity unrelated to or in direct contrast to the concepts and techniques of kino pravda and its descendants. New German Cinema is one of many examples of such movements. Within this movement, Rainer Werner Fassbinder embraced a realism derive d from Brecht's anti representational estrangement effect, while Werner Herzog explicitly rejected the aesthetic and ethical confines of cinÂŽma vÂŽritÂŽ in favor of his own version of cinematic realism, which he termed "ecstatic truth." Herzog's own ideas ab out authenticity are


! ## frequently expressed through his use and invocation of indigenous peoples and cultures in his films. When we understand authenticity as a cult of death in the context of the Western paradigm anyway and contextualize the photographic pr ocess as the mechanical and chemical preservation of the past, then a dominant culture's persistent invocation of the indigenous as authentic seems natural and rational. The indigenous typically figure as part of the mythic past, as symbols of an older era wiped out by the inevitable march of progress and civilization. That the indigenous in most of the world were decimated by disease, starvation, war, dispossession, and various means of marginalization contributes to their status as symbols of death and su ffering a kind of permanent state of death and suffering as it is located in the past and by extension authenticity. The most basic claim or linkage of the indigenous to authenticity resides in the definition of indigeneity, which signifies original inhabi tation of a particular geographical region. The indigenous are always understood as "original people," the ones with a natural historical right to their territory, though that has rarely factored into settlements of legal factual ownership. The indigenous are perceived as the authentic inhabitants of their ancestral territory, regardless of the current legal landowners. Few people among the dominant culture in settler colonial societies will deny the dispossession of the indigenous, even while hesitating to support reparations or any form of remuneration for that dispossession. It is a general truism that cultures tend to derive authenticity from historical originality. Nativist movements are particularly concerned with defining who is part of the "real" cit izenry at the exclusion of the Other, the non real non citizens.


! #" Who is real is dependent upon claims of historical origin, whether accurate or not. Members of European American nativist movements cite their earlier date of immigration as justification fo r their national authenticity in contrast to people who arrived in more recent waves of immigration. Race, class, and religious affiliation complicate notions of citizenship, belonging, and nation, but nativist rhetoric in general is more explicitly concer ned with a chronology of migration that ignores, obviates, or otherwise downplays the presence of an indigenous population. Indigenous nativist movements, such as the pan indigenous Ghost Dance movement, are also fixated on an authenticity derived from a m igratory timeline that validates the members as the original and rightful territorial claimants. Such movements often encompass a spiritual and racial component as well. Even the alternative names for various groups of indigenous, such as the First Nations people of Canada, reflect this notion of authenticity through a temporal geographic originality. Representations of the indigenous whether historical, literary, visual, or political may be traced back through the centuries to the earliest records of con tact. In his journal from his 1492 voyage, Columbus writes, "The natives are an inoffensive people a simple race, and with delicate bodies I could conquer the whole of them with fifty men, and govern them as I pleased" ("Christopher Columbus: Extracts from Journal" n. pag.). Columbus also remarks : the indigenous "would be good servants and I am of the opinion that they would very readily become Christians, as they appear to have no religion." Columbus initiated the view of the indigenous in the Americas as primitive, simple minded, technologically and intellectually inferior heathens ripe for conquest, conversion, and subjugation. They could be useful as slave labor. Otherwise, they should


! #L be cast aside as impediments to progress and enrichment, having no le gal claim to the land they are occupying and its vast resources. Secondary accounts, interpretations, and representations of the indigenous that confirmed these stereotypes abounded over time. Supposedly sympathetic representations of the indigenous hav e also appeared throughout history, but they are equally problematic in their generalizations and reductions, denying to the indigenous the interiority and individuality requisite for humanization. Some of the most famous and influential among these includ e: William Shakespeare's construction of the colonized and subjugated savage, Caliban, in The Tempest (1610 1611), John Dryden's concept of the "noble savage" articulated in The Conquest of Granada (1672), Benjamin West's idealized indigenous warrior in hi s painting The Death of General Wolfe (1770), and Alexander Pope's "poor Indian" in his Essay on Man (1734): Lo, the poor Indian! whose untutor'd mind/ Sees God in clouds, or hears him in the wind." In contrast, i n his 1880 82 Ethnographical Notebooks Ka rl Marx extolled the virtues of the indigenous. In his research on the tribes of the Iroquois Confederacy, Marx describes what he perceives as a pre modern and thriving proto socialist society. His findings lead him to the conclusion that "primitive commun ities had incomparably greater vitality than the Semitic, Greek, Roman and a fortiori the modern capitalist societies" (qtd. in Sayer 13). Imperialists, artists, poets, intellectuals, and politicians have all appropriated indigenous authenticity for their own various ideological purposes. One could continue to trace the roots of indigenous representation in cinema to other historical antecedents, but given that this essay is concerned narrowly with cinematic representation, the focus m ust turn now to the ni neteenth through twenty first centuries.


! #N CHAPTER 1 MYTHIC IMAGES: THE AMERICAN WEST AND THE INDIAN Indigenous representation was linked to authenticity at the birth of cinema. The first films of indigenous peoples were short pieces (well under a minute) that capture supposedly authentic tribal dances. Produced by Thomas Edison in his Black Maria studio, these 1894 demonstrations of the new medium feature Native American performers from Buffalo Bill's Wild West show. The actors include adults and children dressed in what is assumed to be traditional tribal garb engaged in a performance of indigenous authenticity. From the beginning, indigenous actors were required to perform their indigeneity regardless of the performance's correspondence to their lived exp eriences and history. The representation of the indigenous in the United States soon shifted away from this early iteration the indigenous as subject of non narrative curiosities/spectacles to the indigenous as discursive fixtures of American genre films. D.W. Griffith's short films about the indigenous codify the "Indian" as a weak and inferior being fated for destruction at the hands of the white race. In Griffith's work, the indigenous are passive victims who exist at the mercy of the dominant race and are subject to their oppressors' caprice. Griffith's Ramona: A Story of the White Man's Injustice to the Indian (1910) is among the earliest narrative films featuring the indigenous as the main characters and the subject, although Griffith himself directe d a number of short films featuring the indigenous in 1908 and 1909, including The Red Man and the Child, The Red Man's View, and The Red Girl A seventeen minute drama, Ramona tells the story of an orphaned girl of mixed race, Scottish and Native American who endures communal scorn and eventually tragedy, partially because of her indigenous heritage, but mostly as a consequence of her love for an indigenous man.


! #E Mary Pickford plays Ramona and Henry B. Walthall plays her Indian lover, Alessandro. Walthal l would go on to star in Griffith's The Birth of a Nation five years later as Colonel Ben Cameron, the hero of the film, who founds the Ku Klux Klan. Ramona is based on the popular novel of the same name by Helen Hunt Jackson. Jackson was a strong critic o f U.S. policy towards the indigenous population, penning A Century of Dishonor in 1881, a nonfiction tract that excoriates the U.S. government and white settlers for their ill treatment of the natives. Three years later, Jackson wrote Ramona hoping to arou se greater public sentiment and support for the cause of the Indians. Much of the novel's content is abbreviated and simplified in the film. The novel is over three hundred pages long, so the film presents a hurried synopsis of the narrative. On its surfac e, Griffith's Ramona seems to present a sympathetic portrait of the indigenous, but the work is a confused and highly reductive text that promotes many of the worst stereotypes and racial fears of the dominant culture in the early 20 th century United State s. Ramona is the adopted daughter of the wealthy Moreno family in Southern California. Resisting the advances of the rich Felipe, Ramona falls in love with Alessandro, a poor Indian who works around the hacienda. Ramona's adoptive mother confronts her and warns her to stay away from Alessandro. She informs Ramona of her indigenous blood. This knowledge seems to drive Ramona closer to Alessandro. Griffith's plotting is vague here, but perhaps in retribution for Alessandro enticing Ramona and potentially com mitting miscegenation (even though Ramona is partially indigenous), white men destroy his village, and the young lovers are forced to flee. Ramona's racial representation is somewhat amorphous. She is presented to the audience


! #M as white at first, and there is nothing to indicate otherwise in her appearance, class, beliefs, associations, behavior, etc. Her adoptive mother then informs her and the audience that she is indigenous. As soon as she gains this knowledge, she seems spurred to "rejoin" her people, as symbolized by Alessandro, even though she has never considered the indigenous her people and has always occupied a higher social and racial caste in relation to them. Film scholar Chon Noriega argues: The Mexican cum Indian must be made almost the same through miscegenation and assimilation in order to engage the reader's identification, then allowed to return' to her true nature' in a sort of leap of faith that is all too similar to racial masquerade her newfound Indian ness is assumed despite t he racial, linguistic, cultural, and class differences between Ramona and the other Indians she encounters (209). The film cuts to some time later, clearly many months in the future as Ramona and Alessandro have had a baby. They are living in a small hou se. They are soon forced to abandon their home for a pittance by white men. The couple is h omeless and wandering. They are unable to provide adequate care to their newborn child, and the baby dies. Distraught after burying his child, Alessandro lunges at a white man who confronts him for loitering on his property. The man pulls his pistol and shoots Alessandro, murdering him. Though too late to save Alessandro, Felipe soon appears on horseback and comforts the grieving Ramona. After her "indigenous misadve nture," it seems Ramona will return to white society. The subtitle of the film, A Story of the White Man's Injustice to the Indian suggests that Ramona is a progressive revision of the history of westward expansion, but


! #X accepting the subtitle at face val ue would be a superficial and incorrect reading of the film. Ramona's historical revision constructs a binary of the good Indian versus the evil white man, as opposed to the civilized white man versus the savage Indian, bu t this puerile role reversal is in line with Griffith's trademark essentialist racialization. The subtitle is direct and simplistic, and unsurprisingly the film's representation of indigenous people, all of whom are played by white actors, suffers from gross oversimplification. The "Indian Alessandro, is kind and peaceful. He serves white people until he disobeys their wishes, at which point he and his people suffer terribly at their hands. His village is destroyed, he is repeatedly forced off his land, and finally he is murdered. He offe rs little resistance to his treatment, bearing his burdens with cries of anguish, while taking no action in the direction of retaliation. Alessandro Ramona, and the other indigenous people (who are mostly off screen) are passive victims who seem to accept their fate; the white settlers will destroy them, and there is no point in fighting back or even attempting to escape. They are permitted only to mourn for themselves, to lament their weakness and inferiority. In the closing shot, Ramona kneels and sobs over the body of her husband. She allows Felipe, who appears standing upright at her side, to comfort her. Felipe, though not directly responsible for Alessandro's death, is part of the white power structure that routinely exploits and victimizes the indi genous population so he is invariably complicit in this action. Ramona's acceptance of Felipe's consolation signifies several narrative conclusions. First, Ramona returns to the protection and comfort of white society, as well as the safety of her original identity as a white woman. The narrative brutally punishes Ramona for straying from her racial identity and having a child with an indigenous man.


! #Y Ramona commits miscegenation twice over: first by embracing her indigenous ancestry and betraying/abandoning her whiteness, a form of internal or spiritual miscegenation; next through her sexual contact and reproduction with Alessandro, fulfilling the traditional standard of miscegenation. As an indigenous woman, Ramona submits to the temptation of sexual contac t with a member of her own race. As a white woman, Ramona submits to the temptation of sexual contact with the fetishized Other. Owing to Griffith's obsession with a racial purity embedded in femininity and tied to female sexual purity, the narrative must punish Ramona for these offenses. She loses her property, her husband, and her child. Once Ramona is completely destitute, the narrative then allows her to re enter the white communal life she once spurned. Despite the subtitle of the film and the cruelty of the white characters, Ramona functions less as a critique of westward expansion and the dispossession of the indigenous and more as a demonstration of indigenous inferiority and as a cautionary tale about the repercussions of race mixing. In the Unit ed States, the popular apotheosis of indigenous representation is the Western. The Western serves as a warehouse of images and clichÂŽs for American popular culture's imagination of the United States' western territory. This imagined West is "an idea that s himmers with abstractions such as frontier, opportunity, honor, individualism, and justice, and it is often (but not always, to be sure) recognized by visual cues such as the cowboy hat, the horse, vast stretches of open rangeland rimmed by snowy peaks or desert mesas, and the handguna largely rural space populated by ranchers, cowboys (Witschi 4 5) and of course the native population fated to be swept away by the tide of history: the "Indians." Edwin S. Porter's 1903 film, The Great Train Robbery, marks the


! #D inception of the Western genre in cinema 6 though its roots extend to nineteenth and early twentieth century Western fiction, whose conventions were codified in the works of James Fenimore Cooper, Owen Wister, and Zane Grey. The Western ebbed in popula rity with the advent of sound film in the late 1920s, but the genre witnessed a renaissance in popularity and artistry in the late 1930s with the release of the critical and commercial successes Destry Rides Again (1939), Union Pacific (1939), and especial ly John Ford's return to the genre after many productive years working outside of it, Stagecoach (1939). Many prominent directors worked in the Western genre, including Raoul Walsh, Elia Kazan, and George Stevens, but the work of American director John F ord represents the peak of the form. Ford enshrined D.W. Griffith's early thematic contributions to the Western canon: the feckless, weak, and pathologically inferior "Indian" and the fear of miscegenation accompanied by fatal consequences. Ford deviates f rom Griffith in his construction of the indigenous as a dangerous and ruthless threat to white settlement. Ford renders the "Indian" either ineffectual and passive or savage and hyper threatening according to the needs of the plot at the moment. In 2011, t he U.S. National Film Preservation Board added John Ford's 1924 film The Iron Horse to the National Film Registry. In commemorating the work and justifying its preservation, the registry describes the film: "A classic silent film, The Iron Horse introduced to American and world audiences a reverential, elegiac mythology that has influenced many subsequent Western s" ("Library of Congress" n. pag.). The Iron Horse tells the story of the construction of the transcontinental railroad, detailing the difficulties and triumphs of !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! M !U+-'2+4(B/! !"#$2'#+($!'+&-$3)44#'5$ '4!5.G2'5!2&!,:.!'%5'=.%2+4!;-.4.%*.!5.4;',.!',4! 4,0,+4!04!0!&2+%50,'2%0(!8.4,.-%!&'()!,.K,7!!


! "[ westward expansion, ultimately culminating in the joining together of the Union Pacific line with the Central Pacific line in May 1869 at Promontory Summit, Utah. Among the difficulties threatening the path of the railroad is the ever pres ent fear of ambush by Native Americans. In some of the most celebrated Westerns in film history, including Stagecoach (1939) Drums Along the Mohawk (1939) My Darling Clementine (1946) Fort Apache (1948) She Wore a Yellow Ribbon (1949) Rio Grande (195 0) The Searchers (1956), and Cheyenne Autumn (1964), "Ford almost single handedly rewrote American Western history by codifying conventions of the western genre, including those related to the representations of Indians" (Grant 211). Ford codified Native Americans as the omnipresent threat or obstacle to the progress of European American expansion across the continent in fulfillment of the inevitable Manifest Destiny, confirming and perpetuating through the cinematic medium the centuries old stereotype of the "Indian" as a stumbling block to the eventual and proper, indeed preordained, colonization and civilization of the "New World" by European settlers. This broad stereotype does not fully describe the Western's construction of the "Indian" in all its idi osyncrasies but rather serves as an umbrella for a menagerie of images and ideas associated with the indigenous. Stagecoach along with the aforementioned Iron Horse codifies the image of the Native American as, not simply an annoying spatial presence or obstacle, but as a violent threat to expansion. The image of the Native American as violent threat neither was a new idea, nor was this its first appearance in a film. Its roots extend to representations in historical accounts and literature beginning wit h Columbus's record of his interactions


! "# with the indigenous. In the celebrated climax of Stagecoach a band of Apaches attack the titular stagecoach, a harmless civilian transport. The 6 th U.S. Cavalry Regiment rides to the rescue at the last second and ru ns off the Apaches. Here, westward expansion is not represented as conquest or dispossession but rather as the innocent movement of non violent citizens going about their affairs. Ford constructs the indigenous as violent and aggressive, whereas the white characters though they may have personal failings and immoral tendencies are in a wholly defensive position and would appear to pose no threat to the indigenous. Even the cavalry is presented in a purely defensive light; the U.S. military functions as a so rt of latter day Knights Templar, providing safe passage to Christian pilgrims through dangerous territory. Stagecoach also hints at a fear of sexual contact with the indigenous. In the moments before the arrival of the cavalry, it seems certain that the Apaches will be victorious. The Southern gentleman Hatfield prepares to use his last bullet to kill the fragile and respectable Mrs. Mallory, believing that death is preferable to capture by the Apaches. This implies at the very least the potential for se xual violation and echoes a common trope in the definition and practice of Southern masculinity: protecting white women from the threat of sexual contact with members of other rac es. As J.P. Telotte explains, "[t] hroughout the American cinema we can find a n oft recurring scene in which a white woman or in some cases, a child is about to be killed b y a loved one (115). Telotte argues that this kind of action is a transgression of "trust and blood ties" that calls into question the very nature of love, but t hat in the context of the racist nightmare these scenes promote, to deliver death is to provide a merciful and loving escape from the "unspeakably savage violence anticipated from the other" (115). M en of African descent


! "" have historically supplied the Amer ican imagination with fears of sexual violence, depra vity, and miscegenation. These racial fears are not restricted to any single race or ethnicity, however, and there is a tradition of projecting the same fears onto the indigenous. The racial and sexual politics of the film also manifest themselves in an earlier scene, though here the intention is comic relief not intense drama or horror. The whiskey salesman Peacock shouts and recoils upon seeing that the Mexican station keeper Chris's wife is an Apache woman. "Savage!" Peacock cries out, partially in shock and excitation but also in warning to the others. Chris, clearly pleased with himself, responds, "That's my wife, Jacima, my squaw." In disbelief, Peacock continues, "Yes, but she'sshe's savage." Chr is affirms humorously, "S’, se–or, she's a little bit savage, I think." Peacock's reaction exemplifies the dominant white culture's discomfort with the indigenous presence in general and its fear of race mixing/integration via conjugal and domestic relatio ns. Chris somewhat distinguishes the degree of Jacima's ethnic ancestry and satirizes the false dichotomy of savage versus civilized in describing her as "a little bit savage." For Peacock, no such distinction exists. One is either savage or one is civiliz ed, and the difference is racial. My Darling Clementine offers a typical example of the "drunken Indian." Wyatt Earp, played by Henry Fonda, enters Tombstone with his brothers and finds an intoxicated Native American man shooting wildly at passersby from inside a saloon. Earp handles the situation nonchalantly, disarming the man and tossing him outside the building. He proceeds to chastise the gathered townspeople for allowing an Indian to drink. The scene is unremarkable, except perhaps in that it is the only reference to the


! "L indigenous throughout the film, codifying the indigenous as a nuisance with a dangerous predilection for alcohol at the exclusion of any other possible representations. In The Searchers Ford offers the image of the "good Indian," a young man named Martin who is the half white, half Cherokee adopted nephew of John Wayne's Ethan Edwards. Martin is one of the titular searchers. A raiding band of Comanche killed Martin's adoptive family and kidnapped his sisters, Debbie and Lucy, so he joins Ethan and Lucy's fiancÂŽ in a quest for vengeance and to rescue the young girl Debbie and her older sister. Martin is a "good Indian" because he is so effectively whitewashed. Martin is anglicized both biologically and by family upbringing. He joins w hite men in a rage fuelled mission of retaliation against Indians. His function is authorized and mediated through the paternalism of John Wayne's character, the white uncle who is viciously racist and maintains contempt for Martin's Cherokee lineage despi te their familial connection. The Comanche murder and presumably rape Lucy. They keep Debbie alive to raise her as one of their own. After years of searching, Martin and Ethan discover Debbie living in a Comanche camp with a chief named Scar. Debbie does not wish to leave. She considers herself Comanche now. Ethan endeavors to murder her, taking the fear of the sexual violation and corruption of white women to its logical extreme. Debbie has already been tainted by sexual contact with the indigenous male, so she is of no further productive use to white society and will only serve as an object of shame. If Ethan kills her, he eliminates the threat of miscegenation and may still be perceived as "putting her out of her misery" and saving her from the "fate wo rse than death." Ethan's intention to kill Debbie being clear, Martin intervenes, shielding Debbie with his body so Ethan will not shoot her. Enraged


! "N but deterred from his initial murderous intent, Ethan proceeds to kidnap Debbie away from the Comanche and return her to white society. Her initial protests ignored by Ethan, Debbie does not speak again in the film. Whether her silence signifies scorn and melancholy at being stolen from her people yet again or calm acquiescence and even relief is uncertain. The Searchers employs the indigenous as both violent threat and comic relief. In the course of the long search, Martin is presented with a fat Indian bride. He has no interest in her and tries to get rid of her, but she is persistent. She wishes to consumm ate the marriage, but Martin is repulsed. The sequence culminates in Martin kicking her. She rolls down a hill, gratuitously humiliated, and Martin and Ethan return to their quest. Ford's dichotomous gendered representation of the indigenous as both sourc e of terror and source of humor points to the malleability of racial and cultural stereotypes. The Other fulfills the racial fantasies of the dominant culture in all their variety and contradictions. Ford's cinematic antecedent and a major influence on his work, D.W. Griffith, codified this form of racial representation in The Birth of a Nation (1915). White actors in blackface portray African Americans as a range of caricatures: sexual deviants obsessed with raping white women, obsequiously loyal servants totally deferent to white authority, barefoot buffoons with watermelon in hand masquerading as legislators and making a mockery of governance, etcetera. Representation is not limited to a single image or behavior, but the character and actions of the Other is invariably determined by race, not by circumstances, personal his tory, or individual initiative. 7 The indigenous in !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! X Nor is this representative schizophrenia restricted to one or two races. In the nineteenth and early twentieth century, the opium use and supposed suitability to hard labor of Chinese immigrants in the United States was attributed to their "Chineseness." In the


! "E Westerns operate as gears in the machinery of the plot; that is to say, the plot never serves the will and consciousness of the indigeno us, rather the will and consciousness of the indigenous always serve the plot. Whether the indigenous are even represented as possessing free will and consciousness is disputable. Denied interiority and self determinacy, they do not exist as individuals bu t rather as foils to the dominant culture. They function equally well as villains or fools, as obstacles or irrelevancies whatever the plot calls on them to be. Though problematic, The Searchers is far from being a one dimensional white nationalist fantas y in the mode of The Birth of a Nation At times, Ford's lens frames race relations critically. The character of Ethan Edwards may be perceived not as an endorsement of racial hatred and violence but as a qualified critique. Though John Wayne was typecast as the heroic model of nobility, justice, and morality, Ethan Edwards is not a purely heroic character. He functions as an antihero, an antisocial, rage fuelled loner with a mysterious and potentially criminal past and a pathological hatred of the indigeno us. In one scene, he shoots out the eyes of a dead Comanche warrior, explaining that in the Comanche belief system, this will force the man's soul to wander blindly for eternity in search of paradise. For Ethan, it is insufficient that this Comanche's body is dead. Ethan must destroy his soul. As sympathetic as Ethan Edwards may be in other scenes, few audiences are likely to sympathize with the gratuitous and malicious desecration of a body. Ethan's intention to kill Debbie for her assimilation as a Comanc he and probable miscegenation is an even more jarring complication or contradiction of the John Wayne !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!! later twentieth century and early twenty first century, Chinese students' adeptness at math and science and their supposed suitability for careers in such fields are also attributed to their "Chineseness."


! "M image and the Western mythos at large. Moreover, the initial actions of the Comanche raiding party are not presented as the naturally bloodthirsty and sav age behavior of Native Americans, but rather they are explained as retribution for earlier violence visited upon the chief Scar's family. Granted, The Searchers is not about the murder of Scar's family. The film dramatizes the brutal destruction of Ethan's family, not Scar's. Thus it provides powerful narrative and psychological justification for Ethan's brutality, whereas it offers justification for the Comanche atrocities only through brief dialogue, which hardly possesses the same rhetorical impact. Neve rtheless, the film is not as simplistic as Ford's earlier work and the vast majority of films in the genre. Ford somewhat problematizes race and interrogates the binary Western myths of good versus evil, civilized white man versus savage Indian, foreshadow ing his later attempts at more explicitly revisionist representation. In Cheyenne Autumn (1964) released eight years after The Searchers Ford attempted to create an epic revisionist apology and tribute to Native Americans. Ford had always denied any rac ist intent in his films, claiming that his representations were historically accurate. Cheyenne Autumn may be a tacit admission of guilt, but it is at the very least a demonstration of Ford's concern for his reputation and legacy. 8 Despite its good intenti ons, the film is still rife with problematic representations of the indigenous. Not the least of these issues is the casting of white actors to play indigenous characters, a common theme of Western productions. Among the most extreme examples is that of Ir on Eyes Cody, an actor who played small and supporting roles as a Native American in !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Y !6787!9-'&&',:!&2((2?.5!0!4')'(0-!;0,,.-%!5.*05.4!.0-('.-/!'%','0((B!5.&.%5'%=! !"#$ %&'("$)*$+$,+(&)!04!:'4,2-'*0(!,-+,:/! 0%5!,:.%!;-2*..5'%=!,2!)0P.! 6-()7#'+-0#$ C#D#MF/!0%!.;'*!&'()!032+,!,:.!:2--2-4!2&!;-.R+5'*.7!


! "X over 200 films and television productions, though he is perhaps best known for his role as the "crying Indian" in the 1970 public service announcement "Keep America Beauti ful." Though he claimed to be of authentic Cherokee Creek descent, married two different women of indigenous descent, and adopted two sons of indigenous descent, Iron Eyes Cody, born Espera Oscar de Corti to Sicilian immigrants in Louisiana, was in fact of Italian descent. Iron Eyes Cody genuinely identified as indigenous, while refusing to acknowledge his Italian heritage. He seems to have been sincerely devoted to Cherokee Creek culture, so his performances on film and television as an indigenous man were not driven solely by self interest. Cheyenne Autumn features several indigenous characters in prominent roles, but these roles were all filled by non native actors, including Mexican born Gilbert Roland as Dull Knife, Italian American Sal Mineo as Red Shirt, and Mexican born Ricardo Montalban as Little Wolf. Furthermore, the indigenous extras playing Cheyenne were mostly of Navajo descent, and they can be heard speaking in the Navajo language throughout. The pervasive use of "redface" in American Wester ns lingers into contemporary film productions. The Lone Ranger (2013) is the most recent high profile example of this, featuring Johnny Depp in a leading role as Comanche warrior Tonto. Though the actor has made vague claims of indigenous a ncestry (Thompso n n. pag. ), neither Depp nor anyone associated with him or the film production have provided any corroborating evidence for this claim. Cheyenne Autumn 's attempt at reinscribing the Western mythos and its reductive representations of the indigenous are ma rred also by a plot that struggles to allow the indigenous self determination. Film scholar Barry Keith Grant argues that the film


! "Y endorses Manifest Destiny in that the "wilderness must be tamed' by the imprisonment of Cheyenne Indians by the U.S. militar y," and that Ford ultimately fails to present the indigenous in a positive light: "In the film, defeated Indians fight with one another, captured by the army and held captive until their fate is decided by a U.S. official in Washington, D.C." (212). The in digenous of Cheyenne Autumn are no longer the savage aggressors of Stagecoach and The Searchers Ford transforms them into helpless victims, literal prisoners of the U.S. government and figurative prisoners of their fate: Manifest Destiny.


! "D CHAP TER 2 ETHNOGRAPHIC FANTASIES AND SYMPATHETIC STIRRINGS Popular and influential representations of the indigenous on film, particularly representations that emphasize and commodify authenticity, are not limited to the Western. Robert Flaherty's 1922 film, Nanook of the North an ethnographic documentary focused on the daily lives of an Itivimuit family in Quebec, has claims of authenticity far exceeding anything produced within the American Western genre. Ushering in the golden age of ethnographic cinema t he period spanning 1922 to 1932 and including Flaherty's Moana (1926) and his partial collaboration with F.W. Murnau, Tabu (1931) perhaps no film in the first half century of cinema is so bound to concepts of authenticity as Nanook In its subject matter its visual grammar, and its narrative structure, Nanook constructed a model of the authentic, whose influence reverberates throughout contemporary cinema. Few films prior to 1922 even strived for the appearance of authenticity achieved by Nanook Fatimah Tobing Rony describes Nanook as a "point of origin: It has been called the first documentary film, the first ethnographic film, as well as the first art film" (300). It is no coincidence that this reputed "first documentary" features indigenous people. It concretizes the traditional function of the indigenous as repositories of authenticity, as symbols of reality and vitality disconnected from and inaccessible to contemporary audiences due to the indigenous' temporal dislocation in an imagined and hermetic past. Flaherty professed an early fascination with what he describes at seventeen as "the magic land of Indians (qtd. in Griffith xviii). Flaherty's romantic conception of the indigenous seems to have formed already at this young age. It seems contradict ory


! L[ then, at first, that Flaherty does not frame the story of Nanook and his family as the re creation of a ro manticized past, but rather that he seeks to represent these people, their lifestyle, and the events of the film as existing completely in the pre sent. Nanook remains a relic of the past, however, because his ethnicity, his livelihood, and his geography belong firmly to the past irrespective of contemporaneity. The dominant culture extends its hegemony onto the epistemology of t he past, defining his tory through a discourse of civilization, particularly as it concerns social, political, economic, technological, and cultural "progress." That Nanook lives in the present only serves to lend greater vitality to that past to which he belongs and greater au thenticity to his person as a kind of corporeal ghost, an essentialized historical dybbuk haunting the modern screen. In all the copious and wordy intertitles of the film, Nanook never speak s for himself, not without Flaherty's paraphrasing. Inuit individu als' thoughts or statements are absent from the film text, their entire existence contained within Flaherty's silent narration. It appears that these Inuit live in a world devoid of white settlers, and yet a white man exercises absolute control over their representation. The subtitle of Nanook of the North offers the film's first claim to authenticity: "A story of life and love in the actual arctic." The choice of the word "actual" indicates that this film will provide authentic documentation of life and a pparently love in a location that despite whatever previous knowledge and conceptions that the audience may have about it will be presented naturally and scientifically. The phrase "actual arctic" h as at least two meanings though: first, the subtle idea of portraying the arctic accurately in revision of any misconceptions or fantastica l notions the viewer might have, and second, the simple implication that Flaherty shot the film on location in the arctic as opposed to a


! L# studio or less rugged location that b ore some resemblance to the arctic. Robert Flaherty's preface to the film states: "This film grew out of a long series of explorations in the north which I carried out on behalf of Sir William Mackenzie from 1910 to 1916. Much of the exploration was done i n journeys lasting months at a time with only two or three Eskimos as my companions. This experience gave me an insight into their lives and a deep regard for them." Flaherty frames himself as explorer and scientist first, filmmaker second. His preface goe s on to detail his complete inexperience in film production, citing several failed attempts to produce presentable pieces before shooting the footage that would become Nanook of the North. Before the film proper even begins, the preface constructs the dire ctor as a good faith documentarian whose intentions lie in exploration and provides an authentic account of what and whom he encountered. What Flaherty fails to mention is that the sponsor of his five expeditions, Sir William Mackenzie, was a mining baron, and that Flaherty's mission was to search the area for iron and copper ore deposits that could be profitably exploited (Griffith XX). Many of the film's scenes depict a way of life that was outmoded to the Inuit at the time of filming. In famous sequence s, the men use harpoons to hunt, whereas they had already begun using firearms for these purposes by this time. Nanook's apparent shock at hearing a phonograph for the first time was entirely staged. He was already familiar with the technology and had hear d records before. Flaherty is interested in representing authenticity on film, but he is not necessarily concerned wi th authenticity in the mode of cinÂŽma v ÂŽritÂŽ. Nanook's name is not Nanook. It is Allakariallak. Nanook's wife is not his real wife. Most of the scenes in the film were fabricated or modified for cinematic purposes.


! L" Flaherty's prioritization of good cinema over genuine authenticity is reflected in this passage from his journals in which he explains his plan for the walrus hunt to the group o f Inuit men: "Suppose we go,' said I, do you know that you and your men may have to give up making a kill, if it interferes with my film? Will you remember that it is the picture of you hunting the ivuik [walrus] that I want, and not their meat?'" (qtd. in Griffith 38). Typical of any commercial film, capturing the desired footage is of primary concern. Everything else is secondary or irrelevant. In the scene of the seal hunt, Nanook struggles with the seal on the end of his line for an indeterminate leng th of time. Flaherty jump cuts many times during the scene, so the audience has no way of knowing how long the struggle lasted or if anyone assisted Nanook in what appears to be an exhausting task for a single man. We do not see the precise moment when the seal is killed. Why is this climactic moment edited out? Perhaps because someone did assist Nanook off camera, or even used a gun to kill the animal, as was common practice among the Inuit at the time. This is speculation, but the jump cuts and odd deleti on of the actual kill invite questions. Flaherty's editorial interference extends beyond the closing credits of the film, reaching even beyond t he grave. Allakariallak died in bed from an unspecified illness two years after filming, but Flaherty claimed he had been lost in a storm while hunting for deer and died of starvation, a much more romantic death befitting the image of Nanook the brave hunter (Christopher 387 388) Flaherty's documentary style bears more resemblance to the documentary philosophy of Werne r Herzog than any of the cinÂŽma v ÂŽritÂŽ practitioners that he inspired, such as D.A. Pennebaker and the Maysles brothers. Describing the intention of his documentary work in contrast to what he calls "the truth of accountants" Herzog writes,


! LL There ar e deeper strata of truth in cinema, and there is such a thing as poetic, ecstatic truth. It is mysterious and elusive, and can be reached only through fabrication and imagination and stylization" (Herzog 301). 9 Nanook of the North released over two decade s before Herzog's birth, seems to encapsulate this filmmaking ethic. It is rife with fabrication, imagination, and stylization, yet Flaherty frames it all as an authentic revelation of a fascinating subject. That the subject is a group of human beings and not some props or plot details seems to be of little consequence. The first two intertitles of the film directly follow the preface, introducing the location of the film and the subject: "The mysterious Barren Lands desolate, boulder strewn, wind swept i llimitable s paces which top the world," and: "The sterility of the soil and the rigor of the climate no other race could survive; yet here utterly dependent upon animal life, which is their sole source of food, live the most cheerful people in all the worl d the fearless, lovable, happy go lucky Eskimo." Flaherty's simplistic descriptions of the people he documents seem to reflect his genuine, if mildly condescending, fondness for the Inuit, confirmed by his candid journals in which he writes of the Inuit as "the kindly, the brave, the simple Eskimo" (qtd. in Griffith 43). Sandwiched between the first two intertitles is the opening shot of the film, a thirty second tracking shot across a dark bay littered with floating ice. Mountains in the background obscure the sun, casting an eerie and foreboding pall across the already lifeless landscape. This shot confirms the intertitles' verbiage: mysterious, barren, desolate, and sterile. The audience has no way of knowing whether the sun is rising or !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! D !W0%B!2&!\.-<2=J4!&'()4/!'%*(+5'%=! 8+(+$9)'/+-+:$;/<&''#:$("#$='+("$)*$2)> /! 8&(?0+''+7>) /! ="#'#$("#$2'##-$;-(1$@'#+A1 /!0%5! B+CC5$D#)C7#E$;$F#+'$&-$("#$!+&/+$ 0-.! 032+,!,:.!'%5'=.%2+4!2-!'%*(+5.!'%5'=.%2+4!.(.).%,47


! LN setting, further decontextualizing and disorienting the viewer. This exaggerates the idea of this geography as alien and detached from our own existence. Throughout the long tracking shot, the camera bobs up and down, causing the landscape to gently rise and fall and indic ating that this footage was shot from a moving vessel. The motion is not distracting, nor does it make the landscape difficult to discern, but it is noticeable. The involuntary motion of the camera solidifies the impression that this film was shot in the r eal location, the "actual arctic," and not on some Hollywood backlot where conditions could be minutely controlled and the camera would most likely not rise and fall with the current of the sea. Flaherty's description of the indigenous of this region as "the most cheerful people in all the world the fearless, lovable, happy go lucky Eskimo" may seem amusingly unscientific to modern audiences, undercutting the film's purported authenticity as a documentary of life in the "actual arctic." Yet, similarly que stionable pronouncements about entire races of people surface in the modern cinematic descendants of Nanook such as Werner Herzog and Dmitry Vasyukov's ethnographic documentary depicting the daily lives of people in the Siberian taiga, Happy People: A Yea r in the Taiga (2010). The film documents how the indigenous people of a tiny village in the taiga eke out an existence in the face of brutal cold, rugged terrain, and few modern conveniences. The title of the film, Happy People is evidence enough that th e filmmakers are partaking in the dubious generalizing that so often reduces indigenous peoples to a list of vague traits. Herzog provides support for the title in his narration that casts the villagers mostly the men as soldiers on the front lines of the epic eternal contest between man and nature. For Herzog, these are "real men" living deliberately,


! LE struggling for survival, and supposedly rejecting the comforts of modernity for a "traditional" way of life, perhaps with the exception of their snowmobiles. As this way of life belongs to the past, it is implicitly authentic. For Herzog, the indigenous people of the taiga refuse participation in the evil, gloomy, and alienating present, so they are happy. This brief example suggests that Flaherty's mode of do cumenting the indigenous is no relic of a less enlightened era, but rather a model of representation upon which filmmakers continue to rely. Prominent critics continue to praise Nanook for its seeming authenticity, even while acknowledging that much of the production was staged and stylized. In 2005, film critic Roger Ebe rt described the man Nanook as one of the most vital and unforgettable human beings ever recorded on film," ("Nanook of the North" n. pag.). Ebert roots the film's authenticity in its star and corroborates the notion of the indigenous as more vital and alive than a typical human being, even though that vitality and measure of life is necessarily located in the past. The Silent Enemy (1930) is an uneasy companion to Nanook of the North a complementary piece in some regards that also contradicts Nanook's representation of the indigenous. Directed by H.P. Carver (an elusive figure for whom this is his only directing credit), produced by William C. Chanler and one of the heirs to the Vanderbi lt fortune, William Douglas Burden, a hunter and explorer, shot by a majority indigenous crew, and featuring a cast of indigenous actors, The Silent Enemy depicts the lives of a group of Ojibwa living below the tree line of Canada's Hudson Bay region in th e period before contact with European settlers. William Douglas Burden is also credited as the story writer. The Ojibwa struggle against their titular enemy, which is not the white man or another tribe but rather the threat of hunger during the brutal wint er. The first intertitle


! LM explains this surprising fact surprising generally given the rarity of the subject's centrality in any film, but more particularly due to the construction of the indigenous as typically at odds with white people in some way but alm ost never in conflict with nature. Even in depictions of the indigenous that stress their savagery and violent aggression, these visions still stress the indigenous oneness with nature, the notion that the indigenous are an emanation of their environment o r a part of the environment itself. The word "HUNGER" appears in capital letters, introducing the theme and quickly dispelling any speculation as to the identity of the enemy. The Silent Enemy and Nanook of the North deviate significantly on this point. In Nanook where the arctic environment obviously threatens human survival, Flaherty sensationalizes the adaptations of the Inuit, stating that no other people could live in those conditions. In Flaherty's vision, the environment is inhospitable to human h abitation, yet the indigenous possess some essential quality that enables them to survive. Even with nature at its most adversarial, Flaherty envisions some superhuman indigenous connection to it. This conception of the Inuit is an ideological artifact of the romantic fantasy of the noble savage peacefully or even blissfully coexisting with an unspoiled wilderness, the forest primeval untainted by civilization. Embedded in Flaherty's cultural imagination this fantasy finds expression in the implausible cla im that the Inuit live happily and harmoniously in their harsh environment. Whether or not some Inuit people are actually "happy" with their lives whatever that means is irrelevant. Flaherty denies them individuality and interiority. Happiness is part of t heir essence for Flaherty, not the result of pleasant circumstances, self determination, self actualization, or anything that might contribute to an individual's contentment. The Silent Enemy


! LX promotes no such illusory generalizations about indigenous life, dispelling the fanciful notion that indigenous people function in perfect harmony with or as an emanation of nature. When the indigenous are not distinguishable from their environment, they are rendered equally disposable and helpless as that environment, equally de individualized as some trees or birds and equally without consciousness and agency as a river or valley. The Silent Enemy combines multiple genres. It functions as a narrative film with a fairly straightforward and linear plot about the strugg le of the Ojibwa tribe to survive, but it also functions on an ethnographic level. The prologue explains that the film is an effort to preserve this specific indigenous culture before the historical memory of the Ojibwa disappears along with their descenda nts. Whereas Nanook of the North presumes the authenticity of the indigenous on screen and relies on the accepted authenticity of its presentation of the indigenous investing its credibility and generic status as an ethnographic documentary in this authent icity The Silent Enemy engages in a deeper meditation on authenticity. A prologue written and spoken by Chief Chauncey Yellow Robe, who also appears in the film as a wise old chief, problematizes the question of authenticity in The Silent Enemy Directly a ddressing the camera, Chief Yellow Robe asks the audience to consider the performers as authentic indigenous people revisiting their heritage before its destruction by the white man, as opposed to actors inhabiting roles envisioned by the screenwriter and director. This direct address precedes the narrative and exists outside it, but it also contextualizes our viewing and comprehension of the narrative. Chief Yellow Robe acknowledges the performativity of the film, leaving no doubt that it is a work of fict ion featuring actors actors of indigenous descent but actors nevertheless. Yet at the same time, the audience is expected to read the actors as


! LY psycho emotionally sincere members of a community engaged in a performance that functions ritualistically and he nce more authentically than a performance wrought for commercial purposes only and incentivized through monetary remuneration. The actors perform not for the pleasure of the viewer or not exclusively for the pleasure of the viewer but as a means of conne cting with their ancestors through existential imitation, reclaiming a historicity beyond the European and colonial context, and preserving for posterity this Ojibwa community's conception of their pre contact lifestyle and paradigm. This final function le nds the film an ethnographic component, but the ethnography is presented as a re enactment of pre contact authenticity, rather than a performance of authentic contemporary indigeneity. The prologue introduces a concept of authenticity through performative sincerity, as opposed to actuality, that is absent from popular representations of the indigenous, including Nanook of the North The prologue also grants the indigenous some degree of interiority though not to the same extent as Kent MacKenzie's The Exil es (1961) three decades later Chief Yellow Robe delivers the prologue himself, a prologue that he wrote, explaining that he and the other indigenous performers appear in the film as conscientious members of their indigenous community, who respect the mate rial as well as the reality and people it seeks to represent. This projects a sentience and self regard onto the indigenous that precludes their reduction into props or animated backdrop mechanically serving an Anglo expansionist fantasy. Despite Chief Ye llow Robe's claim that the performers were indigenous people partaking in a kind of ritual resurrection of their cultural heritage, the actors' various ethnicities complicate this proposition. In a piece for the San Francisco Silent Film Festival, Benjamin Schrom clarifies the ethnic backgrounds of the key actors in The


! LD Silent Enemy Chief Yellow Robe was Sioux. Molly Spotted Elk, a Penobscot woman from Maine, plays the chief's daughter. Chief Buffalo Child Long Lance plays Baluk the hunter. He was born Syl vester Clark Long in North Carolina and was of mixed Cherokee, Lumbee, African, and European descent. Chief Akawanush plays Dagwan the medicine man. Akawanush, whom Schrom does not comment on and whose heritage remains mysterious due to a dearth of availab le information, was born Paul Benoit in Ontario ("The Silent Enemy, 1930" n. pag.). The extras and film crew may have been mostly Ojibwa, but the stars of the film were not. Buffalo Child Long Lance's deceptive claims about his background would ultimately destroy his career. Donald B. Smith recounts how Long Lance had passed for many years as a man of purely indigenous descent until an investigation conducted by the film production company revealed his mixed heritage, a revelation that scandalized Long Lanc e's white friends and patrons (243 244). Despondent over his ruined reputation, Long Lance committed suicide in 1932. Knowing that the stars of the film are not in fact Ojibwa, we must reconsider the new contextualized meaning of Chief Yellow Robe's prolo gue. If we still accept the performance as a dialogue with or reenactment of the indigeno us past of the performers, that interpretation constructs a vision of indigeneity as an ethnic and cultural monolith wherein the living descendents of any tribe can co nnect with the ancestral experience of any other tribe because of a shared indigeneity. This is an ahistorical, mythologizing premise. Different historical experiences, customs, beliefs, cultures, etc. both before and after European contact mark different tribes. These various tribes constitute distinct and separate nations. To suggest mutability or fluidity among them reduces rigidly separate identities into an imagined melting pot, creating a monolithic indigeneity akin to the


! N[ stereotype of the "India n" p ortrayed in popular cinema. A spectator might accept the premise of English actors portraying French characters in a film about the French Revolution for the sake of entertainment and easier comprehension, but a spectator cannot and would not accept this p remise in terms of authenticity. The same logic applies to a Sioux p laying an Ojibwa. Thus, one is inclined to go beyond the identity of The Silent Enemy 's participants in judging its authenticity On the other hand, The Silent Enemy may be engaging in an early filmic invocation of pan tribalism or pan indigeneity suggesting possibilities for interpretation that do not preclude the acceptance of some notion of indigenous singularity. The narrative excludes the European colonial presence, but hunger may f unction as an allegory for the existential threat of colonialism. This interpretation most likely reflects a postcolonial intellectual framework, however, and by no means accurately describes the intentionality of the filmmakers. Though the representation of the Ojibwa is still at the mercy of the film's white producers, The Silent Enemy manages to articulate an enlightened, humane vision of the indigenous almost a full decade before John Ford's Stagecoach charged to commercial and critical glory with the i ndispensable aid of a menagerie of vicious stereotypes.


! N# CHAPTER 3 RE ENVISIONING INDIGENOUS AUTHENTICITY Several filmmakers from non indigenous backgrounds have participated in the project of reinscribing representations of the indigenous. The Micha el Powell and Emeric Pressburger production 49 th Parallel (1941) counters much of the inscription of the indigenous wrought by cinema in the previous decades. The film is an anti Nazi propaganda picture made at the urging of the British Ministry of Informa tion. A British memorandum to the War Cabinet entitled "Programme for Film Propaganda" outlines the main objects of feature films to be produced by the government: "showing our independence, toughness of fibre, sympathy with the under dogIdeals such as fr eedom, and institutions such as parliamentary government can be made the main subject of a drama or treated historically" (qtd. in Christie, Powell 121). Released October 8, 1941, almost two months to the day before the Japanese attack on Pearl Harbor, 49 t h Parallel presents an ideal of democratic unity in the face of fascist aggression, portraying Nazi Germany and the fascist ideology as a threat to freedom everywhere in an attempt to draw the United States into the war. Ian Christie recounts, "Powell had read an article about how Canada had come into the war on Britain's side despite internal French Canadian hostility, and he understood how the forceful presentation of this issue could help win the most important propaganda battle of all: to bring America into the war quickly" (36). The effort was irrelevant in light of Pearl Harbor, but the film was a critical and commercial success and provides a democratic, multicultural counterpoint to Nazi propaganda. The film follows the clandestine survivors of a N azi U boat that was destroyed by Allied bombers in the Hudson Bay as they make their way through Canada at first


! N" towards the Western coast to catch a Japanese vessel that will provide them safe passage. When the six sailors have been reduced to one lone su rvivor either through violence or apprehension by the Canadian authorities and/or patriotic Canadian civilians, the final Nazi heads towards the U.S. border hoping to gain asylum in neutral territory. The Nazi seamen terrorize and brutalize everyone in the ir path, including a number of Inuit people. The representation of the indigenous in this film differs significantly from Flaherty's work fewer than twenty years earlier. No Inuit or First Nations individual has a particularly large role in 49 th Parallel but Powell and Pressburger still achieve a much more humanizing form of representation by constructing the indigenous as more than an extension or projection of their ethnic origin. A common presence throughout the film, the indigenous are not artifacts fr om the past dislocated in the present, but individuals some of whom are named characters who have adapted to historical shifts and fully participate in modernity. 49 th Parallel includes the indigenous in the Canadian national imaginary as citizens with e qual rights and responsibilities and hence an equal stake in the outcome of World War II, similar to Frank Capra's propaganda film The Negro Soldier (1944), although 49 th Parallel is not directly concerned with recruiting the indigenous to the war effort. In the opening moments of the film, reports stream over the radio of a U boat sighting. "An Eskimo reports seeing a submarine" one announcer exclaims, implicating the indigenous presence at the inception of the film and foreshadowing the importance of the indigenous in the plot throughout. In an early scene shortly following the opening, the Nazis take over a trading post near the Hudson Bay. The denizens of the post include its proprietor, known only as The Factor, a French Canadian fur trapper


! NL named John nie, who is played by Laurence Olivier, and an Inuit man, Nick. Nick is the first victim of Nazi aggression in the film. Diving to protect his friend Johnnie from an attacking sailor, Nick enters a brief scuffle with the man, which ends in the Nazi beating him unconscious with the butt of his rifle. Nick's action and victimization accentuate the argument that World War II is not a limited conflict involving the European continent and its colonial offshoots but rather a global conflict that will determine the future course of all civilization, a great contest between freedom and democracy on one side and authoritarianism and oppression on the other. So great is the scope of the conflict that even the Inuit, seemingly detached from the squabbles of Europe, a re compelled to participate. Ever loyal to its themes of strength through freedom and unity from diversity, 49 th Parallel never constructs the indigenous as somehow outside the Canadian national identity and project. As Johnnie explicitly states, in refere nce to Nick, "He [sic] Canadian." Nick is an Eskimo in the language of the period, and he is referred to as such, yet he is also and more importantly a Canadian. In another scene at the trading post, the Nazi leader, Lieutenant Hirth, quotes from Mein Kamp f describing a racial hierarchy in which Negroes and Eskimos are at the same lowly level, only barely above the Jews. "What's wrong with the Negroes?" asks The Factor, interrogating Nazi racial propaganda and fortifying the film's attempt at projecting an image of racial harmony among the diverse peoples within the allied democracies. As the Nazi seamen prepare to leave the post, they attempt to detain a group of civilians, mostly Inuit women and children. When the civilians turn to flee, Lieutenant Hirth gives the order, and they open fire on the crowd, massacring a number of Inuit. A close up of an Inuit woman and her baby sprawled on the ground provides a potent visual


! NN summation of the crime. At this point in the film, it seems Powell and Pressburger ha ve relegated the indigenous to the role of perpetual victim, but the narrative soon contradicts this one dimensional characterization. As the Nazis attempt to flee via a stolen seaplane, they must unload some of the transport's heavy cargo in order to take off from the water. One of the men stands on one of the plane's pontoons and helps to toss items overboard. As the plane gathers speed, an Inuit rifleman on the shore fires a shot and successfully snipes the German, who proceeds to fall into the water lif elessly. As the film progresses, the location shifts to western Canada and features a number of indigenous people belonging to the First Nations, as opposed to the Inuit peoples of Canada's northeastern and arctic territory or the MÂŽtis people. The Canad ian Constitution Act of 1982 recognizes these three broad groups for classification purposes based on self identification, historical roots, and identification and acceptance by the communities themselves: "In this Act, aboriginal peoples of Canada' inclu des the Indian, Inuit and MÂŽtis peoples of Canada" (Canadian Department of Justice 63). The Nazis, now disguised in civilian clothing, stumble upon a large gathering of people celebrating "Indian Day," a holiday commemorating the history and contributions of the indigenous in Canada that seems to be a precursor to Canada's National Aboriginal Day, first celebrated in 1996. Among the many attendees are a large number of First Nations people, attired in their traditional clothing. A Canadian Mounted Police of ficer interrupts the proceedings to announce that the German fugitives may be among the crowd. He reads a description of each of the men and instructs the crowd to look around for them. The camera cuts between close ups of the Germans and close ups of seve ral indigenous people sifting through the crowd with their intense stares. Close ups of indigenous people


! NE are disproportionate to their demographic presence in the crowd. The editing, consisting of rapid cuts between the native faces and the increasingly d istressed Nazis, suggests that the penetrating stares of the indigenous cause one of the Nazis to lose his nerve and attempt to flee the crowd, at which point he is apprehended by an officer. 10 "Indian Day" offers enlightening contextualization of indigen ous representation. The film includes First Nations people dressed in a traditional style and riding horses, but it provides the proper context for this representation as a performance of indigeneity that is part of the holiday, rather than the typical att ire and behavior of the indigenous. Thus, the film makes an important temporal distinction that so many films featuring the indigenous fail to make: the indigenous are not ossified remnants of the past but rather individuals who adapt to changing historica l and technological idioms, retaining or discarding traditions as it suits their interests as they strive for a dignified existence. As Leslie Howard's character later remarks on Indian Day: "That's just for tourists." This is the context that is absent fr om Edison's 1894 shorts, John Ford's epics, and Robert Flaherty's ethnographic mythmaking. The final sequence of 49 th Parallel involving the indigenous features Leslie Howard as Philip Armstrong Scott, an eccentric English writer and anthropologist study ing the Blackfoot tribe on their ancestral hunting grounds. He is staying in a teepee and living among several indigenous people, including one man named George to whom !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! #[ !A:.!;-.)'4.!2&!]0<'4!,-0G.(('%=!+%5.,.*,.5!,:-2+=:!U0%05'0%!42*'.,B!-.G.-4.4!,:.! ]0<'!234.44'2%!?',:!%2,!-.*2=%'<'%=!H.?4!.K;-.44.5!'%! !"#$G(#'-+7$H#I !C#DN[F!0%5! H#I$.J11 !C#DN[F7!^).-'*!_-.443+-=.-/!?: 2!?-2,.! KL (" $D+'+77#7 /!?04!0!\+%=0-'0%!H.?! ?:2!:05!('G.5!0%5!?2-P.5!'%!9.-)0%B!'%!,:.!#DL[47!\0G'%=!&(.5!,:.!]0<'4!,2!_0-'4! 0%5!(0,.-!`2%52%/!_-.443+-=.-!+%5.-4,225!,:.!;2(','*4!0%5!'5.2(2=B!2&!]0<'! 9.-)0%B/!0%5!:.!&(';4!,:.!4.0-*:'%=!0%5!0**+40,2-B!=0<.!+ 4+0((B!-.4.-G.5!&2-! 4+4;.*,.5!H.?4!2%,2!,:.!]0<'47


! NM he is closest. Having slipped away from the Indian Day festivities, the remaining two N azis stumble upon Scott, who is fly fishing on a lake adjacent to his camp. Scott, assuming these men are lost tourists, invites them for dinner, and they accept. Later in the evening, Scott shares his views on the Blackfoot tribe with his guests, drawing a curious parallel between that tribe and the "modern tribe" of Nazism. Scott suggests that the Blackfoot tribe and the Nazis use similar military tactics, such as employing acts of terror to destroy an enemy's resolve and aggressively attacking their neig hbors, who pose no threat and live in constant fear of attack. Scott also compares Hitler's rhetorical tactic of repetition to the rhetoric of Blackfoot leaders, who also used constant repetition to emphasize a point, relying on emotion and the drilled mes sage as opposed to rationality and wisdom. Scott frames the Blackfoot tribe as savage barbarians, but he is explicit in placing them in the past. Blackfoot descendants are no longer the savages of Scott's research. Even so, comparing the Blackfoot people to the Nazis based on somewhat vague claims of similarity is problematic, indicating that 49 th Parallel has its shortcomings. That an aristocratic Englishman serves as the gatekeeper of indigenous history testifies to the film's imperfections. Driven by t he motivation to present an inclusive, multicultural society living in and deriving its strength from harmony, 49 th Parallel attributes conflicts among indigenous Canadians to savages of the past with no connection to the model citizens of the present. Des pite the unfortunate comparison, Scott describes the Blackfoot tribe as only one among many, deriving their reputation for savagery in contrast to their peaceful neighbors. This is a differentiation among the indigenous that few non indigenous filmmakers h ave managed or even attempted to represent. After the Nazis


! NX reveal themselves to Scott, they tie him up in his teepee and attempt to run away through the woods. George and his companions discover Scott, untie him, and proceed to track one of the Nazis to a cave, where George apprehends the man. Here is another instance where the indigenous play a central role in neutralizing the Nazi threat, casting them in an inclusive and heroic light. 49 th Parallel is explicit propaganda so it ignores the history of mar ginalization and dispossession endured by the indigenous of Canada for the sake of an image of unity and strength a unity and strength derived from embracing ideological and racial diversity in opposition to the Nazi model of unity and strength derived fro m authoritarian control of policy and a vision of ethnic homogeneity. The role of the indigenous in the film as almost mechanically supportive of the anti Nazi effort may seem to deny them individuality and interiority, but Powell and Pressburger construct all of the Canadian characters as noble and reliable exemplars of democratic values regardless of personal history or individual character traits: "Canadian society is shown in all its dramatic diversity, from the Eskimo and French Canadian trappers aroun d Hudson Bay to the German speaking Hutterite communities, the Indians on their reserve and the Anglo Canadians in their cities and wildernesses" (Christie, Arrows 37). Furthermore, Laurence Olivier's bumbling caricature of a French Canadian is far more re ductive and artlessly stereotyped than the representation of the Inuit. Curiously, the only characters who seem to possess free will and an interior monologue are a number of the Germans who are uncertain about the moral rectitude of their actions and ideo logy. One of the Nazi seamen, Vogel, goes so far as to desert his fellow seamen in an attempt to join a Hutterite community outside Winnipeg where they have sought shelter. Vogel's commanding


! NY officer, Lieutenant Hirth, summarily tries and executes the man for his crime. The representation of the indigenous in 49 th Parallel is unique because there is nothing particularly unique about it. The natives are not a threat, an obstacle, an amusement, helpless victims, or a cheap source of authenticity, and though their role is limited in the narrative in the sense that no individual of indigenous descent plays a major character they are not so submerged as to become merely part of the backdrop. In contrast to the use of the indigenous in the Western, the indigeno us of 49 th Parallel are not bound to serve as gears in the machinations of the plot. They are pressed into the service of the film's propaganda themes, but that is true of every character and ethnic or national group in the film. In contrast to Nanook of t he North 's formulation of the indigenous as temporally dislocated symbols of vitality, happily pursuing their pre modern lifestyle, 49 th Parallel formulates the indigenous as very much a part of the immediate present, participating in the fight against fas cism and having as much at stake as any other member of the society. An Inuit man is among the first to fall victim to fascist aggression, the massacre of the Inuit civilians constitutes the single most heinous crime by the band of Nazi sailors, and other Inuit individuals as well as First Nations people are later instrumental in either killing or apprehending the Nazis as they attempt to flee Canada. The film differentiates among the tribes and blocs of indigenous peoples. No single character functions as a reductive symbol for his or her entire ethnicity, nor is any single ethnicity presented as especially superior or inferior to any other ethnicity. Shifts in federal and state policy and the rise of indigenous activism changed the landscape of indigenou s life in the United States after World War II. Part of the explosion of social movements in the 1960s, the American Indian Movement was a pan indigenous


! ND movement that promoted an agenda of renewed spirituality, greater recognition of tribal sovereignty, a nd socio economic empowerment. Many indigenous films in the later decades of the twentieth century reflect this new context. Powwow Highway (1989) is among a class of American films from the post 1960s period that combine a respect for indigenous culture, humanity, and individuality with traditional cinematic grammar, formulas, and genre conventions. Films in this category include: Little Big Man (1970), The Outlaw Josey Wales (1976), Smoke Signals (1998), Skins (2002), and Frozen River (2008). S uch films p robably do not constitute an "indigenous cinema" in the United States but rather remain isolated, though progressive, examples of mainstream films concerning/involving the indigenous Powwow Highway directed by Jonathan Wacks and adapted from a novel b y Huron writer and activist David Seals (Seals adapted the work himself), uses the frequently paired genres of the road movie and the buddy movie to examine the lives of the indigenous in the late twentieth century. Much darker and more politically abrasiv e than Smoke Signals (1998) Powwow Highway follows two friends from the Northern Cheyenne Reservation in Lame Deer, Montana as they make a circuitous journey to Sante Fe, New Mexico. Philbert Bono, a huge and imposing man with a gentle spirit and playfull y philosophical disposition, and Buddy Red Bow, an embittered and quick tempered veteran of the Vietnam War and the American Indian Movement, grew up together on the reservation and drive to Santa Fe together to bust Buddy's long estranged sister out of pr ison. They stop sever al times along the way at landmarks and places of significance to indigenous Americans, including Bear Butte in South Dakota an area sacred to many American tribes and known to the Cheyenne as Noah! vose and Fort


! E[ Robinson in Nebraska, where Crazy Horse sur rendered to the U.S. Army and where the army imprisoned Dull Knife and his tribe of Northern Cheyenne for their refusal to return to Indian Territory after their outbreak from the Red Cloud Agency. Philbert and Buddy also stop at the Pine Ridge Reservati on in South Dakota, a location heavy with historical significance as the site of the last of the ghost dances, the Wounded Knee Massacre in 1890, and the Wounded Knee incident in 1973, where Oglala and AIM activists occupied the town of Wounded Knee for 71 days. Pine Ridge is also notable as one of the poorest places in the Western Hemisphere by several metrics. The Bureau of Indian Affairs reported a tribal unemployment rate of 89% as of 2005 ( Pine Ridge" 5). The life expectancy on the reservation is in t he high 40s, and only 10% of children graduate from high school, according to the New York Times (Kristof n. pag.). Powwow Highway disabuses the spectator of any romantic or fantastical conceptions of the indigenous with its focus on the contemporary stru ggles of indigenous individuals in a landscape of poverty, alcoholism, criminality/criminalization, and inadequate political representation. The film opens with a slow motion tracking shot of a Cheyenne warrior brandishing a spear and riding bareback on a beautiful palomino through the foothills at sunset. A drum beats on the soundtrack as the warrior leads his galloping horse from right to left across the midground, then towards the camera, then turns to move from left to right across the foreground, his f igure occupying one third of the screen before disappearing from the frame. Shot from a low angle and obliquely backlit by the setting sun, the warrior on horseback cuts an impressive figure, entering the frame in partial silhouette and exiting the frame a s if exiting the stage of history. The film immediately provides context and counterpoint to this heroic and mythic image of


! E# indigeneity. T he screen freezes on the unfocused landscape in the background, the title "Powwow Highway" appears in capital bold bl ue letters underlined with a vaguely indigenous design, then it fades to a tracking shot of a somewhat similar landscape marred by the outward sign s of depressed human habitation. We see trailers and abandoned structures in the distance, debris in the fore ground, a broken down bus and many vehicles in various stages of disrepair litter the frame. A subtitle explains the location: "Northern Cheyenne Reservation/ Lame Deer, Montana." This visual juxtaposition the heroic warrior in motion bathed in golden li ght versus the more lifeless muted colors and immobile, discarded objects of the stagnant reservation problematizes the past as the imagined state of the indigenous in perpetuity, while at the same time glorifying this past as a nostalgic image of self rel iance, self determination, and strength. Powwow Highway embraces this contradiction as a hallmark of indigenous life in the United States. Philbert, played by Gary Farmer, a member of the Cayuga nation from Canada, represents the nostalgia for and connecti on to the past. He believes he is on a sacred journey. He buys a rusted and barely functioning car at the beginning of the film and calls it his war pony. He collects scraps of detritus and junk off the ground and considers them tokens from the ancestors, stating that once he collects four tokens, he will have the medicine to become a great warrior and earn a new name. He frequently sings to himself in Cheyenne, and proclaims at one point that the trickster god/creator of the universe will not allow the whi te man to further exploit and marginalize the Cheyenne. To what extent Philbert truly believes in his own stylization as a Cheyenne warrior and has faith in traditional Cheyenne spirituality is ambiguous, but Philbert's ultimate triumph in breaking Buddy's sister out of jail seems to be an


! E" endorsement of his personal ontology. Buddy, played by A Martinez, who is of mixed indigenous, Mexican, and European descent, represents the modern indigenous man. Uneasy with Philbert's obsession with the past and old traditions, Buddy is more actively engaged in the day to day challenges of the reservation. He works within the bureaucracy of the tribal government as the agricultural procurement agent, and regards with suspicion and anger anyone and anything that does n ot serve the immediate interests of his people. He sees little use in ancestral tokens, drum circles, powwows, and the old spiritual constructs or mythos. He participated in the occupation of Wounded Knee and remains staunchly committed to the ideals of th e American Indian Movement, though the extent of his political activism at the time of the film narrative seems limited. A pointed exchange between Philbert and Buddy illustrates their conflicting personalities. Philbert states, "We are Cheyenne. All the s hit of the world cannot change that." Buddy replies, "Do me a favor, when the heat comes down, don't start in with the old legends and all that mystical horseshit, ok? It'll only make things worse." Buddy is disillusioned by his years of activism within th e AIM, as well as his military service to the United States in Vietnam. Philbert maintains an optimism detached, though not ignorant, of reality. Philbert and Buddy's fragile alliance strengthens into a fraternal bond in the course of the narrative, sign ifying a unification of mythic past with modern reality. This unification is visually affirmed when Buddy throws a car window (broken off of Philbert's car) at an approaching police cruiser, transforming for a moment into the Cheyenne warrior swinging a to mahawk, leaping into the air, and throwing it. Buddy/the warrior hit their target, the car flips and crashes, and the small band of outlaws is able to


! EL escape. Powwow Highway dispels the myths of the American Indian with its focus on the legal, political, c ultural, and socioeconomic challenges of contemporary existence as Northern Cheyenne. The characters are not stereotypes, but rather individuals struggling to define a way of being in an often hostile environment and grasping at the various coping mechanis ms available to them, including alcohol, marijuana, political activism, spirituality, criminality, and violence. The film re appropriates the image of the noble and perhaps savage warrior as a point of cultural pride. It recasts this simplistic image, not as reflective of an indigenous reality of the past or present, but as an icon of indigenous independence and strength regardless of its verisimilitude. Powwow Highway remains dependent on the traditional narrative conventions of dominant film culture and the cinematic grammar of the Hollywood production style. The content of Powwow Highway challenges dominant representation, but the form indicates acquiescence on the part of the filmmakers to the mode of oppressive representation. This compromise could be traced to any number of factors, but commercial dictates would likely be overriding in any event. The film follows the formula of the road/buddy movie genre, advances a linear plot driven by a typical David versus Goliath (or outsiders versus the system) b inary clash, and features a soundtrack of mostly non indigenous performers. The only indigenous music is either diegetic or serves to accent the very brief fantasy interludes of the indigenous warrior. In terms of editing, narrative construction, character ization, mise en scene, cinematography, sound, and acting technique, Powwow Highway conforms to the dominant mode of filmmaking of the period. T he film is not unique in this sense. Most of the films discussed here do not attempt to challenge the normative commercial style. So long as public financing for independent indigenous


! EN filmmakers remains severely constrained on the federal, state, and local levels in the U.S., and so long as these filmmakers must struggle for distribution, a vibrant indigenous cinem a that challenges form as well as content is unlikely to arise. Returning to Canada, as a new century of indigenous life dawned in the country that produced Nanook of the North, The Silent Enemy, and 49 th Parallel indigenous filmmakers sought to reclaim representations of themselves from the dominant culture, focusing on indigenous stories and people from the pre contact past through to the present day. Atanarjuat : The Fast Runner (2001) is an Inuit/Canadian film produced and set in Igloolik, which is lo cated in the northern Canadian region of Nunavut in the Arctic Circle. Set in the prehistoric, pre contact past, i t is the first film whose dialogue is exclusively spoken in Inuktitut, one of the principal Inuit languages of Canada. Isuma Igloolik Producti ons, a majority Inuit company founded by Atanarjuat's director Zacharias Kunuk and the film's cinematographer Norman Cohn, produced the film, and it has produced many other narrative and documentary works featuring the Inuit. Since its inception in 1990, I suma Igloolik Productions has focused on fostering a community of indigenous film production and representing the Inuit authentically on film. Isuma's mission statement explains: "Isuma's mission is to produce independent community based media films, TV an d now Internet to preserve and enhance Inuit culture and language; to create jobs and economic development in Igloolik and Nunavut; and to tell authentic Inuit stories to Inuit and non Inuit audiences worldwide" ( "Isuma Productions: About Us" n. pag.). Thou gh Atanarjuat was a major commercial success, Isuma Igloolik Productions filed for receivership in 2011 (Dixon n. pag. ), and film production has stalled.


! EE A temptation exists to locate the authenticity of a work of art mostly, if not completely, in the id entity of the artist. This is a natural temptation given the history of misunderstanding and misrepresentation endemic to the phenomenon of individuals from one culture/ethnicity producing work about a different culture/ethnicity. The logical tendency is t o assume that people can and will represent their own culture/ethnicity effectively, but this is not by necessity an accurate assumption. Several factors complicate this notion, including: the extent to which an individual from a minority group has interna lized the representations of the dominant group; the extent to which an individual will adhere strictly to a principle of authentic representation in consideration of commercial interests; the extent to which any one individual's output may be considered r eflective of any cultural consensus regarding self representation ; and the multi layered, collaborative nature of film production involving dozens of participants and competing interests M any other factors probably complicate the question but these brief examples should demonstrate the pitfalls of assuming authenticity based solely upon the artist's identity. The corollary to this assumption suggests that individuals outside the group in the case of indigenous people, individuals from the dominant majorit y culture are incapab le of authentic representation, which is a lso a questionable notion. Many critics and scholars emphasize Zacharias Kunuk's Inuit heritage and the Inuit majority makeup of Isuma as at least partial proof of Ataranjuat's authenticity. Yet without even addressing the aforementioned complications of identity most fail to acknowledge the contribution of Norman Cohn, who is not of Inuit descent. Cohn co founded Isuma, co produced Atanarjuat co edited the film, and served as cinematographer Isuma offers this short biography: Norman Cohn (b. 1946, New York)


! EM is secretary treasurer and co founder of Igloolik Isuma's collective. Living since 1985 both in Igloolik and Montreal, Cohn developed with Kunuk, elder Pauloosie Qulitalik and the late P aul Apak, Isuma's signature style of re lived' cultural drama, combining the authenticity of modern video with the ancient art of Inuit storytelling" ("Norman Cohn" n. pag.). Norman Cohn may be an intimate member of the Igloolik Inuit community fundamenta lly committed to authentic representation of the indigenous past and present, but he was still born a white man in New York City. No honest account of Ataranjuat's construction of indigenous authenticity can overlook Cohn's contributions. My point is not t o diminish the Inuit achievement here or in any way to credit Ataranjuat's success to the participation of a white man, but Cohn's presence does undermine the claim that the film's authenticity is derived from the Inuit ethnicity of its makers. As is the c ase with assessing the construction of authenticity in The Silent Enemy we must move beyond identity in order to understand Atanarjuat's effectiveness. Atanarjuat challenges its audiences in several ways, and whatever supposed or actual achievement in a ccessing and representing the authentic is bound intimately to these challenges. Atanarjuat runs 161 minutes. The film features several exciting sequences, but it is not heavy with action. In fact, there are long stretches of the film substantially devoid of action. It contains repetitive sequences reflective of the cyclical nature of the Inuit lifestyle, including many scenes of characters eating the raw flesh of seals or walruses and many shots of dog sledding across the ice. Often, these actions do not a dvance the plot. In addition to the actors speaking in Inuktikut, the film also challenges the spectator to grapple with the element of Inuit shamanism, which plays a central role in the narrative. The film provides little context, introduction, or explana tion


! EX of this belief system. In its exclusive use of the Inuktitut language, deliberately slow pace, long running time relative to the substance of the plot, and unfamiliar cultural signage, Atanarjuat challenges the spectator to overcome his or her expecta tions concerning narrative, pacing, and comprehensibility. Despite these difficulties, Atanarjuat achieved notable commercial success, grossing $5,188,289 against a budget of under $2,000,000 ("Atanarjuat" n. pag.). Critics and scholars have praised Atan arjuat for its universality. Kunuk agrees, attributing the film's success to its universal appeal : "First of all, Atanarjuat was a really good film exciting, entertaining, with good action, love, sex, good camera work, good musicOur legend is a universal story: about love, jealousy, murder, revenge, forgiveness the same for everybody everywhere. Not like Hollywood films. It was shot, acted, edited in our own style. Everything is authentic. The audiences really get the story" (Krupat 146). Kunuk claims that the film's universality contrasts with Hollywood films' implied insularity, a curious argument given Hollywood's market driven model that virtually mandates universal appeal as a prerequisite for investment, production, and distribution. Furthermore, the thematic contents of the film love, jealousy, murder, revenge, forgiveness are indeed universal and therefore feature prominently in Hollywood cinema. Also questionable is the degree to which the acting, editing, and cinematography reflect a distinct and i nnovative style of filmmaking. As mentioned above, the story and cultural content of the film do challenge the foreign spectator's comprehension. However, a slow pace, several confusing plot points, and a distinct cultural vernacular do not equate to a uni que style of filmmaking. Does Atanarjuat challenge the cultural hegemony of traditional film technique and forge its own unique,


! EY indigenous style? Or is it manipulating an established film grammar to construct an authentic vision of the Inuit in a language of cinema that is still comprehensible to a mass audience? I argue that the latter appraisal is closer to the truth. Despite Atanarjuat's foreignness, it adheres to the normative cinematic style of the colonial culture. A number of indigenous produced f ilms, such as Tracey Moffat's Night Cries (1989) in Australia and Shelley Niro's It Starts With a Whisper (1993), produced in the Six Nations/Brantford area in Ontario, modify or break entirely with normative technique, substituting radically different fil m language in reflection of the films' anti colonial ethos and in augmentation of story and thematic elements that would be undeserved by the staid style of the Hollywood idiom. Such films stake out indigenous sovereignty through form, as well as content, rejecting the temporal, physical, kinetic, and narrative conventions of the dominant film culture in favor of a film language more expressive of the indigenous culture. The content of Atanarjuat seems authentically derivative of Inuit culture. The story co mes from the oral tradition, and Kunuk et al. conducted interviews with numerous older members of the community, constructing a complete, consistent narrative from their varying accounts of the story of Atanarjuat the fast runner. The authenticity of the f ilm is vested in this traditional story, not in the mode of its telling, despi te the director's claim, "[i] t was shot, acted, edited in our own style." Kunuk's suggestion is not accurate on any count. The film was shot digitally several years before the advent of near celluloid quality digital photography, so this imparts a televisual quality to the film, giving it a more immediate and documentary like feel. The choice to shoot digitally was practical, not artistic however, as the arctic conditions both i n terms of lighting and temperature render the use of celluloid


! ED inordinately expensive and difficult. Aside from this dubious stylistic departure, the cinematography of the film is derivative of cinÂŽma vÂŽritÂŽ and documentary naturalism with its hand held c amera work, frequent long takes, and low level and often completely natural lighting. The acting of the film reflects the dual strains of naturalism and psychological realism that comprise modern film acting. As authentic as the acting may seem in Atanarju at its style is as derivative of Constantin Stanislavksi's contributions to the art (by way of Stella Adler, Lee Strasberg, Robert Lewis, and Elia Kazan) as the acting style in any contemporary film produced by the Hollywood system. The same logic applies to the film's editing. The film's editors Kunuk, Cohn, and Marie Christine Sarda employ continuity editing, the same technique one will find in any Hollywood production. No other influences are apparent, and there is nothing in the editing that might cons titute an innovation in technique. The editing adheres to the 180 degree rule, uses the match on action technique, continuous diegetic sound, and generally constructs the smooth transition of time and space. In Dialectic of En lightenment Theodor Adorno a nd Max Horkheimer articulate the position of the film spectator as passive recipient of content delivered in a form he or she has been conditioned to comprehend: They [films] are so designed that quickness, powers of observation, and experience are unden iably needed to apprehend them at all; yet sustained thought is out of the question if the spectator is not to miss the relentless rush of facts. Even though the effort required for this response is semiautomatic, no scope is left for the imagination. T hose who are so absorbed by the world of the movie by its images, gestures, and words that they are unable to supply what really makes it


! M[ a world, do not have to dwell on particular points of its mechanics during the screening. All the other films and p roducts of the entertainment industry which they have seen have taught them what to expect; they react automatically (126 127). Atanarjuat appears to challenge Adorno and Horkheimer's view on the difficulty of "sustained thought" in the experience of fi lm spectatorship, but it employs the same "mechanics" of the entertainment industry, delivering its challenging content in an unchallenging form. A non indigenous spectator confronted with the cultural exoticism of Atanarjuat is forced to ponder meaning an d search for parallels in his or her own culture in order to divine an understanding of what is represented on screen. Yet, almost in acknowledgment of Adorno and Horkheimer's warning, the film provides the time and space necessary for the spectator to att empt sustained thought. Also, by following narrative and technical cinematic conventions, the film encourages the "semiautomatic" response of the spectator to the material, empowering a process of rapid, subconscious comprehension to be followed and enlarg ed by a process of conscious discernment. The opening moments of the film demonstrate how Kunuk contains the challenging cultural content within the simplifying and accommodating normative style. The film begins with a long establishing shot of the frozen arctic expanse that will serve as the backdrop for much of the narrative. The shot lasts 50 seconds. A man or woman paces in the midground, his or her features indistinguishable due to the figure's distance from the camera and his or her full body attire. Dogs wander about the frame. Some exit the frame then re enter with other dogs near the end of the shot. One dog remains sitting by its master throughout. The dogs bark and howl to accompany the howling of the wind.


! M# A celestial body hangs low in the sky j ust left of the central vertical axis of the frame. Given the quality of natural lighting at this latitude, it could be either the sun or the moon. The landscape is a uniform bluish white with a flat horizon that constitutes a vague demarcation between lan d and sky lying directly on the central horizontal axis of the frame. This shot introduces the theme of a threatening and barren landscape, but the constant presence of both human and canine life dispels the notion that this is some uninhabitable wasteland The length of the shot and the uncluttered mise en scene allow the spectator to acclimate to the foreign environment, to be transported to a distant time and place without immediately confronting the jarring cultural foreignness that is imminently approa ching. The first dialogue of the film begins off screen, the sound of the voices overlaying the establishing shot of the film for ten seconds before the shot cuts to a close up of the main speaker. This aural stitch in the fabric of the two scenes smooth es over an otherwise difficult transition from the reassuringly static world of the established landscape to the foreign world of an Igloolik home lit only by firelight and filled with voices speaking in a strange language through the shadows. "I can only sing this song to someone who understands it," says Tungajuak, the evil shaman from "the north," in the first line of the film again, spoken over the image of the landscape. In this line, Tungajuak assumes the role of the chorus in the epic poetry and thea tre of Western antiquity, providing a prologue for the work that warns the spectator (at least the spectator who is outside of this community) of how challenging the material will be to their understanding. For the disoriented Western spectator, this allus ion to a form of narration ingrained in Western culture provides a comforting segue into the space of cultural and linguistic foreignness.


! M" The Canadian state's social, economic, and cultural support for indigenous communities was and remains an indispensa ble component of the flowering of Inuit media typified by Atanarjuat The production benefited from funding by the National Film Board of Canada, which goes some way to explain the filmmakers' ability to undertake such a substantial project fraught with so many risks and to do so in a manner that at least partially spurns commercial appeal. Saladin d'Anglure explains the Inuit relationship to the Canadian government: "Inuit probably stand alone in having peacefully achieved so many political, economic, and social gains through negotiations with the government they live under" (qtd. in Krupat 157). This model of fruitful interaction with the state organs of the dominant society varies in its applicability across different societies, depending on the widely di vergent political conditions of these societies. Also, while procurement of state funding is productive in the immediate sense, it carries with it the risk that one's artistic vision may be compromised and one's politics neutralized in an effort to maintai n equanimous relations with the source of funding.


! ML CONCLUSION Representations of indigeneity and its association with authenticity remain popular and pervasive staples of commercial cinema. The apparatus of profit driven film production is unlikely to abandon the indigenous as a topic, as they are an easy source of both authenticity and lurid characterizations. The success of Avatar, whose $2,782,275,172 box office take makes it the highest grossing film of all time ("Avatar" n. pag.), confirms the profitability of the indigenous on film. James Cameron deterritorializes the indigenous by creating an alien species to act as a stand in for the indigenous peoples of Earth. Cameron's indigenous aliens play the role of the colonized, oppressed people viol ently resisting military industrial exploitation in a derivative New Age fantasy. Cameron cleverly circumvented the challenge of authentic and respectful representation by in venting a computer generated indigenous people that could not be linked to any sin gle group. By generalizing and decontextualizing the specific struggles of indigenous peoples, Cameron was able to depoliticize the content of his story while preserving the appeal of a narrative that is familiar to a global audience. Whether or not indige nous filmmakers and their creative allies of non indigenous descent will be able to penetrate further into the marketplace and reach a broader audience remains a complicated and uncertain question. Certainly, commercial and/or critical successes such as Atanarjuat in Canada, Powwow Highway (1989) Smoke Signals (1998), and Skins (2002) in the U.S., Once Were Warriors (1994) and Whale Rider (2002) in New Zealand, and Night Cries: A Rural Tragedy (1989) and Ten Canoes (2004) in Australia seem promising examp les of a new indigenous cinema, but these films are already dated, and none managed to usher in


! MN a wave of robust indigenous production in any of their respective nations. While some made money, none were so profitable as to attract significant investment i n indigenous controlled film productions or productions by non indigenous filmmakers who seek to counter reductive, dehumanizing, and seemingly more commercially viable representations of the indigenous. Progress has not been linear in the history of indig enous representation. 49 th Parallel (1941), The Silent Enemy (1930), and The Exiles (1961), while not necessarily reaching the apotheosis of authentic representation, remain much more radical revisions of traditional images and concepts of indigeneity than films like The Lone Ranger (2013) Avatar (2009) The New World (2005), and Pathfinder (2007) that were produced in the last decade. This also indicates Hollywood studios' reluctance to embrace indigenous revisions of history and representation. These com panies have a vested interest in maintaining mythic and stereotypical conceptions of the indigenous, as these representations promise to be the most profitable. So long as private investment remains weak and state support is lacking or nonexistent dependi ng on the region, filmmakers who challenge traditional representation will be limited in their opportunities to produce films and reach an audience beyond the independent circuit and/or the Internet. This is especially true for individuals who seek to chal lenge cinematic form and forge a distinct style outside of the normative conventions that are so burdened by a history of racism and exploitation. I have mentioned a few examples of such works without going into detail. The construction of indigenous authe nticity through unconventional representation and technique is a separate topic that warrants a thorough and comprehensive analysis. I have focused on filmmakers who mostly adhere to normative technique, while using that traditionally reductive style to


! ME ar ticulate revisionist themes and characterizations. These filmmakers' aesthetic fealty to the dominant, colonial culture qualifies and likely mitigates whatever success they might achieve in terms of content. Commenting on the success of Fernando Meirelles and K‡tia Lund's City of God (2002), a film that exploits a mastery of normative technique to explore subaltern life in a Rio de Janeiro favela, Jo‹o Marcelo Melo writes: Fernando Meirelles seems to be naturally a talented commercial director; and there is no shame in this, if it is taken to mean that he wants his work to reach a large, popular audience rather than a clique of acolytes. The usual argument against all such accusations is at once pragmatic yet simplistic: thanks to that mode of represent ation, the film has encouraged the discussion of the problem on a large scale (even if superficially) and a few young people from that slum have had a chance to start a professional career (481). Like Melo, I concede the usual argument for the popular mo de of representation. While the artistic and political integrity of the work may suffer, such films can potentially reach a broad audience, open up a general discourse on relevant indigenous issues, and promote greater opportunity for indigenous filmmakers actors, and technicians in the industry. This essay has focused mostly on the aesthetic history of indigenous representation and the difficulties of reclaiming and reinscribing authenticity, but the practical difficulties faced by indigenous filmmakers are myriad and substantial. In addition to the challenge of securing funding for film projects, people of indigenous descent must contend with a history of repression, marginalization, and destruction a history that is hardly relegated to the past and rema ins a potent present reality for many indigenous communities. The total abandonment of reductive representation in film


! MM culture is unlikely to precede the ascendancy of indigenous populations to equal socio economic status in the societies in wh ich they li ve.


! MX FILMOGRAPHY KL (" $D+'+77#7$ CW'*:0.(!_2?.((!0%5!^).-'*!_-.443+-=.-/!#DN#F! ;/<&''#:$("#$='+("$)*$2)>$ C8.-%.-!\.-<2=/!#DX"F! ;M+(+' !CH0).4!U0).-2%/!"[[DF! %&'("$)*$+$,+(&)-:$!"#$ C6787!9-'&&',:/!#D#EF! N"#5#--#$;<($ CI.-%0%52!W.'-.((.4!0%5!ab,'0!`+%5/!"[["F @+-0#1$I&("$=)7M#1 !Ca.G'%!U24,%.-/!#DD[F! @#1('5$3&>#1$;/+&-$ C9.2-=.!W0-4:0((/!#DLDF GO&7#1:$!"#$ Ca.%,!W0*P.%<'./!#DM#F! 8+1($3<--#':$!"#$ C ;(+-+'P<+( F!Cc0*:0-'0!a+%+P/!"[[#F! 8+(+$9)'/+-+$ C8.-%.-!\.-<2=/! #DX#F 8&(?0+''+7>)$ C8.-%.-!\.-<2=/!#DY"F! 8)'($;C+0"#$ CH2:%!I2-5/!#DNYF! 8')?#-$3&M#'$ CU2+-,%.B!\+%,/!"[[YF! 2'#+($!'+&-$3)44#'5:$!"#$ C^5?'%!Q7!_2-,.-/!#D[LF B+CC5$D#)C7#E$;$F#+'$&-$("#$!+&/+$ C8.-%.-!\.-<2=!0%5!6)',-B!d04B+P2G/!"[#[F! 6')-$B)'1#:$!"#$ CH2:% !I2-5/!#D"NF! 6($.(+'(1$=&("$+$="&1C#'$ CQ:.((.B!]'-2/!#DDLF! >a..;!T).-'*0!V.0+,'&+(@!C_QT/!#DX[F Q&((7#$%&/$9+-$ CT-,:+-!_.%%/!#DX[F! Q)-#$3+-/#':$!"#$ C92-.!d.-3'%4P'/!"[#LF 9+-$I&("$+$9)M&#$N+A#'+:$!"#$ C6'<=0!d.-,2G/!#D"DF! 9)+-+$ CO23.-,!I(0:.-,B/!#D"MF! 95$@+'7&-/$N7#A#-(&-#$ CH2:%!I2-5/!#DNMF ,+-))R$)*$("#$,)'("$ CO23.-,!I(0:.-,B/!#D""F! ,#/')$.)7>&#':$!"#$ CI-0%P!U0;-0/!#DNNF!


! MY ,#I$=)'7>:$!"#$ CA.-.%*.!W0('*P/!"[[EF! ,&/"($N'E$;$3<'+7$!'+/#>5$ CA-0*.B!W2&&0,/!#DYDF! S-0#$=#'#$=+''&)'1$ C`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

! MD Works Cited 2011 National Film Registry More Than a Box of Chocolates ." Library of Congress Government of U.S. Web. 6 November 2013. Adorno, T heodor W. The Jargon of Authenticity Evanston: Northwestern University Press, 1973. Print. Ad orno, Theodor W. and Max Horkheimer Dialectic of Enlightenment New York: Continuum Publishing Company, 1993. Print. "Avatar." Box Office Mojo Internet Movie Database. 21 October 2013. Web. 21 October 2013. Baird, Robert. "Going Indian': Dances with Wolves. Hollywood's Indian: The Portrayal of the Native American in Film Ed. Peter C. Rollins and John E. O'Connor. Lexington: The University Press of Kentuck y, 2003. Print. Bazin, AndrÂŽ. "What is Cinema: The Ontology of the Photographic Image." Film Theory and Criticism: Introductory Readings Ed. Leo Braudy and Marshall Cohen. New York: Oxford University Press, 2009. Print. Canadian Department of Justice. "A Consolidation of The Constitution Acts 1867 to 1982." Justice Laws Website Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Canada, represented by the Minister of Public Works and Government Services, 1 January 2013. Web. 21 October 2013. Carr, Jay. "The Silent E nemy." Turner Classic Movies Turner Entertainment Networks, Inc., 2013. Web. 5 October 2013. Christie, Ian. Arrows of Desire: The Films of Michael Powell and Emeric Pressburger London: Faber and Faber Limited, 1994. Print. Christie, Ian, ed. Powell, Pr essburger, and Others London: British Film Institute, 1978. Print. Christopher Robert J. Robert and Frances Flaherty: A Documentary Life, 1883 1922 MontrÂŽal and Kingston: McGill Queen's University Press, 2005. Print. Collective, Cache. "Cache: Provis ions and Productions in Contemporary Igloolik Video." Global Indigenous Media: cultures, poetics, and politics Ed. Pamela Wilson, Michelle Stewart. Durham: Duke University Press, 2008. Print. Columbus, Christopher. "The Letter of Columbus to Luis de San t Angel Announcing His Discovery (1493)." American Historical Documents 1000 1904 Ed. Charles W. Eliot. Danbury: Grolier Enterprises Corp., 1980. Print. Columbus, Christopher and Paul Halsall Mar compiler. "Extracts from Journal." Internet Medieval So urcebook Fordham University, 1996. Web. 5 October 2013.


! X[ Dickason, Olivia Patricia. "The Many Faces of Canada's History as It Relates to Aboriginal People." Walking a Tightrope: Aboriginal People and Their Representations Ed. Ute Lischke and David T. McNab. Waterloo: Wilfrid Laurier University Press, 2005. Print. Dixon, Guy. "Out in the cold: the struggle of Inuit film." The Globe and Mail The Globe and Mail Inc., 30 December 2011. Web. 7 November 2013. Ebert, Roger. "Nanook of the North." RogerEber Ebert Digital LLC, 25 Sept. 2005. 29 Oct. 2013. Web. Freud, Sigmund. "Beyond the Pleasure Principle." Beyond the Pleasure Principle Ed. Todd Dufresne. Toronto: Broadview Press, 2011. Print. Griffith, Richard. The World of Robert Flaherty New Yo rk: Duell, Sloan and Pierce, Inc., 1953. Print. Herzog, Werner, and Paul Cronin. Herzog On Herzog New York, NY: Faber & Faber, 2002. Print. "Indigenous Peoples, Indigenous Voices: Factsheet." United Nations Permanent Forum on Indigenous Issues. United Nations. Web. 5 October 2013. Isuma Productions. "About Us" Isuma Productions Isuma Distribution International Inc., 2006. Web. 7 November 2013. Kilpatrick, Jacquelyn. Celluloid Indians: Native Americans and Film Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press, 1999. Print. Kristof, Nicholas D. "Poverty's Poster Child." The New York Times 10 May 2012: A29. Print. Melo, Jo‹o Marcelo. "Aesthetics and Ethics in City of God : Content Fails, Form Talks." Third Text 18.5 (2004). Print. Moor, Andrew. Powell and Pres sburger: A Cinema of Magic Spaces London: I.B. Tauris & Co Ltd, 2005. Print. Noriega, Chon A. "Birth of the Southwest: Social Protest, Tourism, and D.W. Griffith's Ramona ." The Birth of Whiteness: Race and the Emergence of U.S. Cinema Ed. Daniel Berna rdi. New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press, 1996. Print. "Norman Cohn." Isuma Productions Isuma Distribution International Inc., 2006. 29 Oct. 2013. Web. O'Connor, John E. "The White Man's Indian: An Institutional Approach." Hollywood's Indian: The P ortrayal of the Native American in Film Ed. Peter C. Rollins and John E. O'Connor. Lexington: The University Press of Kentucky, 2003. Print.


! X# Penn Hilden, Patricia and Shari Huhndorf. Atanarjuat, the Fast Runner and Its Audiences." All That Remains: Var ieties of Indigenous Expression Ed. Arnold Krupat. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press, 2009. Print. "Pine Ridge Indian Reservation." South Dakota Tribal Department of Tribal Relations US Department of the Interior (Bureau of Indian Affairs), 2010. W eb. 5 October 2013. Quackenbos, G.P. American History For Schools. New York: D. Appleton and Company, 1886. Print. Sayer, Derek. Capitalism & Modernity: An excursus on Marx and Weber London: Routledge, 1991. Print. Schatz, Thomas. The Genius of th e System: Hollywood Filmmaking in the Studio Era New York: Metropolitan Books, 1988. Print Schrom, Benjamin. "The Silent Enemy, 1930." San Francisco Silent Film Festival SF Silent Film Festival, 2013. Web. 5 October 2013. Singer, Beverly R. "Native Am ericans and Cinema." Schirmer Encyclopedia of Film Ed. Barry Keith Grant. Vol. 3. New York: Schirmer Reference, 2007. Gale Virtual Reference Library Web. 5 Oct. 2013. Smith, Donald B. Chief Buffalo Child Long Lance: The Glorious Impersonator Markham : Red Deer Press, 1999. Print. Tarkovsky, Andrei. Sculpting in Time: The Great Russian Filmmaker Discusses His Art University of Texas Press, 1989. Print. Telotte, J.P. "A Little Bit Savage': Stagecoach and Racial Representation." John Ford's Stagecoac h Ed. Barry Keith Grant. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003. Print. "The Fast Runner (Atanarjuat)." Box Office Mojo Internet Movie Database. 21 October 2013. Web. 21 October 2013. Thompson, Bob. "Johnny Depp says he drew on his native herita ge to play The Lone Ranger's Tonto." National Post Postmedia Network Inc., 26 June 2013. Web. 7 November 2013. Tobing Rony, Fatimah. "Robert Flaherty's Nanook of the North : The Politics of Taxidermy and Romantic Ethnography." The Birth of Whiteness: Ra ce and the Emergence of U.S. Cinema Ed. Daniel Bernardi. New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press, 1996. Print. Varga, Darrell. "Atanarujuat: The Fast Runner." The Cinema of Canada Ed. Jerry White. London: Wallflower Press, 2006. Print.


! X" Witschi, Nicola s S. "Imagining the West." A Companion to the Literature and Culture of the American West Ed. Nicolas S. Witschi. Chichester, West Sussex: Wiley Blackwell, 2011. Print