xml version 1.0 encoding UTF-8
REPORT xmlns http:www.fcla.edudlsmddaitss xmlns:xsi http:www.w3.org2001XMLSchema-instance xsi:schemaLocation http:www.fcla.edudlsmddaitssdaitssReport.xsd
INGEST IEID E5ODX0R2Y_G8TQ4J INGEST_TIME 2017-08-16T21:07:09Z PACKAGE AA00013393_00001
AGREEMENT_INFO ACCOUNT UF PROJECT UFDC
GO OUTSIDE 1 GO OUTSIDE: ENGAGING ELEMENTARY ART STUDENTS IN OUTDOOR EXPLORATION By MELINDA TURNBULL SUPERVISORY COMMITTEE LESLIE GATES, CHAIR CRAIG ROLAND, MEMBER A CAPSTONE PROJECT PRESENTED TO THE COLLEGE OF FINE ARTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA IN PARTIAL FULFILLMET OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF ARTS UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA 2012
GO OUTSIDE 2 Table of Contents List of Figures pg. 3 Abstract pg. 4 Chapter 1: Statement of the Problem pg. 5 Chapter 2: Literature Review pg. 8 Chapter 3: Research Methods pg. 14 Chapter 4: Results pg. 21 Ch apter 5: Discussion p g. 41 References pg. 48 Appendix A pg. 54 Appendix B pg. 58 Appendix C pg. 60 Appendix D pg. 61 Biographical Sketch pg. 64
GO OUTSIDE 3 List of Figures 4.1. Drawing the Creek pg. 25 4.2. Flower Observations pg. 29 4.3. First Gr ader Drawing a Tree pg. 31 4.4. Insect and Animal Observations pg. 33 4.5. Using Dirt to Cre ate Art pg. 36 4.6. Kindergarten Building and Pastel Collage pg. 38
GO OUTSIDE 4 Abstract This action research study examined how to incorporate the learning strategy of out door exploration into a forty five minute class period, and what role that strategy could play in student understanding of art concepts. This research is consistent with pr ofessional liter ature concerning the benefits for children of exploring the natural world, the role nature plays in aesthetic experiences, the role inquiry plays in integrating natural science and art concepts, and current studies of eco art education. Through this study, I realized the importance of setting limits, minimizing materials, preparing for the predictable while expecting the unexpected, listening more, observing more, directing less, and learning to follow the students' lead when using the strategy of outdoor exploration. I also discovered how exploring nature could engage the students in aesthetic experiences imaginary adventures, inventing names, sketching from observation, and building an empathetic relationship with nature. Students demonstrated an understanding of how artists work by making personal choices, experimenting wit h tools and materials, collecting and incorporating found objects in their work, and planning projects This study confirmed my belief s that inquiry based learning helps children understand art concepts, that nature can inspire even the youngest artists and that the exploration of nature needs to be a part of the elementary art curriculum.
GO OUTSIDE 5 Chapter 1: Statement of the Problem Exploring the natural world has become a rare e vent in children's daily lives, and yet this form of exploration leads children to new observations, new ideas, and new questions. Outdoor exploration is a learning strategy that has many benefits, and yet it is seldom used in the public school district where I teach. In discussing this with my colleagues, they C ited lack of time, lack of natural environment, and absence of the strategy in their existing curriculum as reasons they rarely take their students outside ( J. Leiknes, J. Glaza, T. Kresser, B. Doud M. Bebout personal communicat ion, April 2012) This troubled me, as the natural world is a massive database that can inspire and inform the artwork of children. Exploring nature is an important aesthetic experience that first adds to children's knowledge of the world, and second to t heir knowledge of art practices; of concepts, subject matter, processes, and materials (Song, 2010) These types of experiences outside the classroom allow students to construct knowledge of their environment which is vital in developing artworks that are divergent and personal (Blandy & Hoffman, 1993; Cowan & Dolgoy, 1984; Kauppinen, 1990; Neperud, 1973; Purser, 1978; Tatarchuk & Eick, 2011). Artists and scientists have long been inspired by their observations of the natural world. Educational research advocates for the integration of art and science as inquiry is at the root of both disciplines (Chessin & Zander, 2006; Dirnberger, 2006; Krug & Cohen Evron, 2000; Weigand, 1985) By using the teaching strategy of outdoor exploration, elementary children c an experience the connection between art and the natural sciences ( Marshall, 2004, 2005 2010; Nelson & Chandler, 1999 )
GO OUTSIDE 6 Exploring nature also serve s as a base for young children to learn the rudiments of eco art concepts which include interdependence, bi odiversity, conservation, restoration, and sustainability. Inwood (2010) concluded that the reason eco art education is not part of elementary art education is a lack of professional development for teachers and the absence of available curriculum. Recen t research by Louv (2 007 ) pointed to the problems of "nature deficit disorder." He correlated childhood anxiety, depression, and obesity with a lack of unscheduled time spent in n ature. The exploratory, inquiry based element of outdoor education can introd uce children to the joy and excitement of discovering their natural surroundings for themselves. As I came to understand the powerful reasons for children to explore nature, I reflected upon my own choices when it came to art education. Even though my personal art practi ce revolved around time spent in nature, I had not attempted to integrate outdoor exploration into my teaching. Staying on the easier road of tried and true lesson plans focused on the elements of art and famous artists let my students p roduce visually appealing artworks, but their drawings, paintings, and sculptures held little personal meaning. Certainly I took my students outside to sketch on days when the weather was nice but I was for the most part, not building on the concept s of inquiry and meaning making. T he goal of this capstone research project wa s to initiate a change in my approach to teaching art Through action research, I sought to answer two questions about implementing outdoor exploration into my teaching practice. First, w hat are the essential factors for implementing outdoor exploration as a form of artistic
GO OUTSIDE 7 inquiry at an elementary level? And second i n what ways will outdoor exploration engage students in artistic inquiry and how will it inform their art practice s? I wanted to know how to purposefully engage my own young students in the learning strategy of outdoor exploration and understand how it could play a vital role in switching from a formal ist ic art education program to a n inquiry based program. By putti ng this strategy into practice, by researching the process and the results, and by sharing the outcome with other elementary art teachers, I hope to inspire others to take their students outside to explore.
GO OUTSIDE 8 Chapter 2: Literature Review This literature review organizes selected scholarly literature that addresses the need for outdoor exploration and the possible im plications of this form of experiential learning to art education around six key concepts. The review does not include an exha ustive synopsis of all literature about outdoor education, the environmental and place based art movements, or the integr ation of art and science, but seeks to synthesize the important ideas behind incorporating outdoor exploration into the art curriculum. The first key concept is that o utdoor exploration of nature is a well documented learning strategy to teach observation, inquiry, and environmental awareness. The strategy is not a curriculum in itself, but a practice that may be applied across many disciplines (Gillenwater, 1969; Tatarchuk & Eick, 2011). Exploring nature as a method of inquiry has been an important part of education for hundreds of years and was promoted by several educational philosophers in the past (Chambers, 2011). Most were inf luenced by the writings of Jean Jacques Rousseau whose novel Emile (1762) told of a child that learned by experience and natural observation, using his senses to construct knowledge and understanding. ideas into educational practice in 1775. Pestalozzian principles, as they came to be known, are foundational to educational systems in Europe and the United States These principles include child centered methods where children are actively involved in dir ect experiences thereby learning through their senses, without being told information they can gather on their own (NCU, 2009). Pestalozzi's student,
GO OUTSIDE 9 Friedrich Wilhelm August Froebel, founded the kindergarten system based on these principles (Chambers, 2011). Froebel believed that all human beings are creative and learn through activities such as storytelling, music, and art making. Nature study was an important aspect of childhood play ( Strauch Nelson, 2012 .) The idea of learning through sen sory experience was promoted strongly in the United States by the educational philosopher s Edward A. Sheldon in the 19th century and John Dewey early in the 20 th century (Chambers, 2011; Dewey, 1934) In the 1960's the Central Midwestern Regional Education al Laboratory (CEMREL) developed a federally supported framework for integrating aesthetics, or sensory experiences, into the general education program. Similar to the current interdisciplinary approach to elementary education this model was based on sensory learning through the arts (Madeja, 1976). Today, technological advancements and social changes have separated children from nature's wealth of sensory experiences by bringing children of the 21st century inside (Louv, 2007). This lack of time spent exploring nature leads to a second key concept, that c hildren and nature can have a mutually beneficial relationship. Lo uv's research (2007) illustrated that excessive time spent indoors has been detrimental to children's well being. Unstruct ured time spent in nature calms anxiety while reducing childhood depression and obesity (Louv, 2007). Furthermore, by staying in side children lack informed empathy for the natural world and are less likely to develop habits of stewardship towards the earth (Center for Ecoliteracy, 2011; Louv 2007 ; Waite, 2011 ). The need to develop environmental stewards through art is the third key
GO OUTSIDE 10 concept. The current environmental awareness movement began in the late 1960's and early 1970's when people noticed that air and water quality w ere being compromised (CNNtech, 2011). The understanding of ecosystems and sustainable habitats, along with a sensibility about the effect humans have on their environment evolved and grew over the past forty years and was coined ecoliteracy in the 1990's. In the 21st century, climate change and environmental destruction have led to an ecoliteracy educational movement to teach the populace about the role humans play in maintaining and restoring the health of the environment (Center for Ecolite racy, 2011 ). Ecoliteracy is not specific to art education ; rather it is an interdisciplinary approach to applying environmental conservation principles to the entire school system. There is a related cont emporary art movement that focuses on environmental health called eco art Artists engaged in eco art center their work on restoring the ba lance between nature and humans, focusing on the interdependency of all life forms and the importance of sustainable systems. Instead of making works of art for viewing, these artists use their creativity to build outdoor habitats an d interactive installations that build awareness of environmental issues (Carter, 1975; Greenmuseum.org, 2010; Thurber, 1997). Eco art education is an offshoot of this movement that brings th e concepts, activities, and art works into the educational system, preparing young people to participate in this contemporary art practice (Blandy, Congdon & Krug, 1998; Hawkins & Vinton, 1970; Inwood, 2010; Miraglia & Smilan, 2009; Neperud, 1997; Thurber, 1997; Ulbricht, 1998). N ot well supported by professional development and teacher preparation the principles of eco art
GO OUTSIDE 11 education remain relatively unknown to many elementary art educators (Inwood, 2 010.) Eco art constructs are depende nt upon an understanding of both artistic and scientific principles. That children are able to connect art and science through observation and inquiry into the natural world is the fourth key concept. Artists and scient ists have traditionally turned to nature for information and inspiration. There is significant research that demonstrate s how art and science share the common practices of observation and inquiry, and how these practices can be used to integrate the two su bjects (Chessin & Zander, 2006; Dirnberger, 2006; Krug & Cohen Evron, 2000; Marshall, 2004, 2005, 2010; Nelson & Chandler, 1999; Weigand, 1985). Several art teachers, particularly at the secondary level, t each the connection thematically, using concepts su ch as camouflage and metamorphosis (Chessin & Zander, 2006; Krug & Cohen Evron, 2000; Nelson & Chandler, 1999; We igand, 1985) Their research however, is limited to the con nections of art and science to process and subject matter; it d oes not address the possible connection of materials between the two disciplines. The fifth key concept is that student art practices may be inspired and informed by the natural world around them. Contemporary art practices focus on the uniqueness of the art ist's location, and how that sense of place inspires the artist in his or her creation (Greenmuseum.org, 2010; Hansen, 2009; Lai & Ball, 2002). The idea of teaching art students to observe the natural areas nearby, as opposed to areas they do not have a pe rsonal connection with is called place based art education (Hansen, 2009) Developing a connection to the environment in which the
GO OUTSIDE 12 student lives leads to a greater variety of artwork and more significant meaning within student created pieces (Blandy & Hoffman, 1993; Cowan & Dolgoy, 1984; Kauppinen,1990; Neperud, 1973; Purser, 1978; Song, 2010; Tatarchuk & Eick, 2011;). This new found connection, or relationship, has led students to use materials and processes found in nature (Hansen, 2009; Song, 2010) Despite the stated advantages of incorporat ing outdoor exploration into elementary art practices the last key concept is that t here is a shortage of current elementary art curriculum and teacher resources for doing so (Inwood, 2010) Some contributing f actors for not using the strategy of outdoor exploration include d mandates from No Child Left Behind that emp hasize reading and testing leaving little time for teachers to use open ended strategies (Sabol, 2010), and the problem of public schools situated in unsafe environments (Zhu & Lee, 2008). Waite (2011) suggested a fear or discomfort with the element of the unknown, or uncontrolled outdoor spaces may influence teachers decisions not to venture outdoors. In summary, o utdoor exploration is an effective learning strategy for teaching the art and science skills of observation and inquiry. When children spend time in nature it can lead to a mutually beneficial relationship between the two if children are taught to become better stewards of the earth. This stewardship is the goal of the ecoliteracy and eco art education movements. Students are better engaged in learning when they notice the connections between their lives, their place in the world, and the subject matter. O utdoor exploration inspires and informs student art practices; for subject m atter, processes, and materials, however the strategy is not well integrated into the public school system for a number of reasons including lack
GO OUTSIDE 13 of teacher resources, concern over teaching students in uncontrolled environments, and educational systems focused on NCLB mandates.
GO OUTSIDE 14 Chapter 3: Research Method The methods used in this research were an attempt to address a disconnect between how I taught art and what I believe d would be a better approach. Like most art educators in Iowa I was follow ing a fo rmal istic art education model that wa s teacher centered rather than inquiry based. Students learn ed about the elements and principles of art, art history and the art of many cultures I would instruct them in a process and a concept, and they would apply the strategy and idea to their artwork. I knew in my heart however, that art education, even at the ele mentary level, should be inquiry based. An inquiry based, experiential model requires students to have experiences that prompt their own questions into art processes and the meaning of their own work (Art21, 2012) The stra tegy of outdoor exploration fit this model of art educati on, and importantly, it connected students to both historic and contemporary art practices and concepts (Inwood, 2010). In order to reflect on and change the way I t aught I engaged in action research. Action research is a relatively new form of research that is well suited to art educators (McFarla nd & Stansell, 1993 ). The systematic, cyclical design of acti on research has been ada pted by many public school districts for professional development and is commonly referred to as reflective practice (Osterman & Kottkamp, 1993) Simply put, action resea rch in education involves recognizing the need to change something in the teaching practice, creating a plan towards that change, taking action and collecting data based on the plan, analyzing the data from the action, revie wing or reflecting upon tho se re sults modifying the plan as need be, a nd implementing it ( taking action) again ( Ferrance, 2000; Painter, 2009; Waters
GO OUTSIDE 15 Adams, 2006) Because this method is a flexible form of research it is important for art educators to employ several different forms of data collection from different perspectives, commonly referred to as triangulation, to verify the results. Ferrance (2000) suggests several possibilities for collecting data to capture various perspectives many of which would be applicable to outdoor exp loration, such as videotapes, photographs, samples of student work, student journals, student interviews and the educator 's field notes. One art educator that has been using action research to reveal the importance of outdoor based art ed ucation at the el ementary level is Dr. Hilary Inwood. She has written extensively about the need for better teacher preparation and curriculum in the field of eco art education (Inwood, 2010), as well as her own collaborative action research base d on the following question s; H ow do teachers define eco art education and apply it in their classrooms? How do they weave together art and environmental education in a cohesive way to learn about environmental issues and concepts? What curricular content and structure strikes a cho rd with teachers and students in elementary eco art lessons? Is a specific pedagogy necessary to present eco art content, and if so, what are its features? What can eco art education look like in elementary classrooms? (Inwood, 20 0 7 p. 4 ) Inwood worked with a team of fou r art educators, who collected their experiences with their students in journals, field notes, and photographs, and then gathered to discuss and analyze their findings. After nine months, they concluded
GO OUTSIDE 16 that further analysis of th eir research was necessary, y et the results were impressive. She states; Students have utilized a range of environmentally friendly materials, from ones found in nature to consumer products that are reusable and recyclable. They have experimented with a w ide variety of techniques, including traditional ones such as drawing and painting, to more challenging ones such as papermaking, clay modeling, basket weaving and ice sculpting. Their creative products have been equally innovative: writing, plantings, sca recrows, murals, performance art, garden installations and a video have all been created over the course of the project. It has been inspiring and exhilarating to both observe and participate in the development of the lessons, as students so often demonstr ated a level of engagement and innovation that we had not anticipated (Inwood, 2007, p.1 2 ) She concluded that they had created an extensive database of elementary eco art lessons studying "the roles of collaboration, place based learning, systems think ing and stewardship in eco art learning, as well as the importance of using biodegradable materials and natural processes in making eco art with children. (Inwood, 2007 p.13 ). Reflecting on In wood's research, I saw parallel s to my own desire to engage s tudents in their local environment. Her interest, however, is specific to developing an eco art education curriculum, while mine is how to incorporate the exploration of nature into an inquiry based art education model. As I considered my own research, I r ealized that o ne drawback of using action research wa s that my findings may not be applicable beyond my individual
GO OUTSIDE 17 location as they will reflect my personal perspectives and beliefs (Riel, 2 011). However, action research wa s valuable in improving my teaching practices as well as my understanding o f that practice (Ferrance, 2000; Painter, 2009; Riel, 2011; Water Adams, 2006). Two serious limitation s I faced in the research were time and class size Inquiry and exploration require s students to follow th eir observations to a natural conclusion, yet we had to work within a time frame of student's scheduled art class periods that took place for 45 minutes, once every eight days. E ach group consisted of 24 28 students, limiting my ability to personally discu ss the exper ience with individual students. A valuable follow up study to this project would be to research the experiences of students who did not have to explore nature within artificial time constraints Nav i gating the Action Research Process In thinki ng about how to start this study, I found guidance in six questions posed by Waters Adams (2006) which were derived from Barrett and Whitehead (1985) to guide the educator in starting his or her own action research. This section describes the ways that I a pplied these questions to my own teaching practice. What was your concern? I was concerned that my teaching practices did not focus on exploration and inquiry and my elementary art students were not engaged in exploring the natural world around them. Why were you concerned? I was concerned because I did not believe my students understood the basic concepts of art. When asked to explain art, they said it was drawing and painting; making something, but they did not view art as a way to create meaning bot h for themselves and others. Most had as little understanding
GO OUTSIDE 18 of the natural world as they did of art (Turnbull, 2011). As stated earlier, there are great benefits for all when elementary students engage with the natural world. Artists have been inspired f or generations by the diversity and beauty of nature and my students were missing this experience. Children benefit physically, emotionally, and mentally from time spent in nature as shown by Richard Lo uv (2007 ). Time spent in nature builds children's empa thy for the natural world and a desire to see it maintained, while giving them a sense of belonging to their environment (Waite, 2011). Considering our rapidly deteriorating global environment, this symbiotic relationship be tween children and nature needed to be developed and nurtured. What did you do about it? I designed and implemented a unit of outdoor explorations for my students, then documented our joint experiences. Teacher planning was an important first step. Prior to taking my students outside, I interpreted and altered my district s elementary science inquiry objectives into art inquiry objective s (Appendix A) From these objectives, I created possible outdoor exploration prompts for kindergarten through fifth grade (Appendix B ) Next I determin ed the supplies I needed to take outside, and put together backpack exploration kits for the studen ts to take with them (Appendix C ), drafted a schedule and wrote lesson plans to communicate my expectations for the outdoor explorations (Appendix D ). I walked the area students would explore to check for safety hazards and conferred with the school nurse about any health concerns. I sent a note to parents and posted information on my school blog about this project as we ll as updates for students an d parents to read during the research period
GO OUTSIDE 19 Putting the plan into action was an exciting moment for both myself and my young explorers. With many stages of planning complete, I took my students outside to explore their school grounds. Although not large in scale, there is a butterfly garden, a restored prairie habitat with walkways, a green space with young trees, and a rambling creek alongside the school property. Th is area w as a relatively safe environment for even the youngest students to explore. I explained the area s boundaries, safety factors including a buddy system, acceptable behavior, observations to be collected, communication signals, and what objects (such as pois on ivy) to avoid I gave them the age appropria te prompts to guide their steps, and then observed their explorations and questioned them about what they were doing When we regrouped I asked the students how they could apply their experiences to their art making processes. Some of those ideas were developed in follow up lessons. For example, the kindergartener's tried building structures with the small objects they had collected, the first graders tried painting with sticks and leaves, and the fourth grade rs experimented with mud as an art medium. What kind of evidence did you collect to help you make some judgment about what was happening? How did you collect such evidence? I observed and daily reflections, through photographs, videos, interviews and then collected the to photograph. How did you check that your judgment about what happened was reasonable, fair and accurate ? My primary goals for the research were to docu ment student engagement in exploring the natural world and to discern how
GO OUTSIDE 20 the learning strategy of outdoor exploration and inquiry would fit into the elementary art curriculum. I reflected on the experiences and analyzed my collected data prompted by thes e questions: Were the students engaged in exploring ? What did that look and sound like? Did their explorations lead students to engagement in the art making process in a different way than before the explorati In what ways did their art processes and projects reflect an understanding of inquiry and meaning making? What steps needed to be in place to have a successful exploration in a short window of time? What type of prompts gave students enough focus to be productive in exploring, yet open ended enough to engage them in their own questions and observations? How could I assess inquiry based artistic processes? In summary, I chose to engage in action research to better inform my choice to include outdoor ex ploration in my teaching. I was inspired by the research of Hilary Inwood (2010) and advised in how to proceed by Stephan Waters Adams (2006) I facilitated my students' explorations into nature, collected evidence of those explorations, and analyzed that data to discover the steps needed to successfully integrate inquiry based outdoor exploration into my teaching practice.
GO OUTSIDE 21 Chapter 4: Results Taking my students outside to observe them exploring nature altered my long held beliefs about the role of a teacher in student learning. Instead of being the authority, I found myself prompting the children with questions that I myself couldn't answer, an d discovered nature with new found wonder, as if from the eyes of my youngest students In looking at my own questions that led to this action research, I was often surprised by the a nswers. My first research question ; W hat are the essential factors for i mplementing outdoor exploration as a form of artistic inquiry at an elementary level?" led me to the following conclusions. Essential Factors for Outdoor based Art Exploration Set limits, both physical boundaries and behavioral expectations, with conseque nces attached for breaking those limits. When working with a large group of children, their safety is paramount. Setting physical boundaries that defined the area in which they could wander safely gave my students the freedom to explore. Giving them a set of behavior al expectations (Appendix D ) and the duty of keeping track of their buddy made them responsible for their actions. As expected, a few students disregarded these behavioral expectations. After some brainstor ming, I fell upon the idea of a Tree Stop Students not following the rules had to stand with one hand on a given tree until I told them they could return to their explorations. This worked surprisingly well in giving the wayward student s a short break to consider their actions. Minimize the number of tools and materials. When my students first went outside, I gave them an entire pack of things to be responsible for and to use in their
GO OUTSIDE 22 explorations (Appendix C ). This was a sizable mistake in that the studen ts had difficulty putting the material pack s on their back s and the packs tore as they were swung about. In taking tools out of the pack, students often drop ped crayons, pencils, and viewfinders and left them behind. They would run, creating the possibility of injury from the pencils in the pack. I eventually whittled down the amount of tools and materials to a clipboard with paper for each student and a sealable plastic bag filled with crayons to be shared bet ween the two partners. With fewer items to be responsible for, and a partner to share in that responsibility, the students spent less time fumbling with their materials and more time engaged in exploring the area. In the future, my students will make perso nal sketchbooks to bring on their trips outside, but time did not allow for that during this study. I carried the pencils in a box, and if the grass was damp, I had two students carry oilcloth squares ( for sitting on ) to our nature area. Th e items in the t eacher's pack (A ppendix C ) however, remained consistent and useful throughout the time spent outside. Prepare for what you can predict, and then be ready for the unknown. As stated previously, I took my students outside only after preparing lessons, materials, and checking the area for safety. What I wasn't prepared for was my students' palpable excitement, active engagement in their surroundings, joy in having an exploring partner, and abject fear of insects. Because this was such an exciting experience, after the first classes went outside, I found I needed to give some brief directions prior to exiting the building. I instructed t he children to listen for two different whistle signals; one chirp meant to listen to me, and a series of
GO OUTSIDE 23 three blasts meant to gather together to return to the art room. Next we discussed two important questions about our explorations: Why are insects and animals outside? And what should you do wh en you meet an insect or animal? The discussion led to students' understanding that nature was home to plants and animals, and that we needed to imagine ourselves as guests. There was a great deal of apprehension when I mentioned snakes, spiders, and bees Students needed to discuss what they should do and came to understand that the best plan was to remain calm. New to them was the idea of quietly observing the insects and animals, and even taking their picture, sketching them, or handling them gently. This handling was a happy surprise as my students became comfortable enough with nature to pick up pill bugs and worms, and observe flying insects that landed on their skin. Not only did I need to prepare my stude nts for the unkno wn, I needed to prepare myself. Teaching in a relatively controlled environment, such as a classroom, is completely different than teaching outdoors. Students had more varied experiences with more varied objects. This led me to another con clusion. Listen and observe more, direct less. When exploring outdoors, I discovered that I needed to observe what my students were doing, not direct what they were doing. Having given the children instructions on how to stay safe, we exited the building then sat in a circle within the nature area as I introduced the concept of aesthetic exploration through a short group exercise in sensory awareness (Appendix D ). My last element of group instruction was a p rompt to engage their thou ghts (Appendix D ). As they wandered away from the group circle, I
GO OUTSIDE 24 wat c hed what they were doing, asked them to explain their thinking, and answered most questions with another question. For example, I asked the first graders, "If a tree could talk, what qu estion would you ask it?" Their answers were surprisingly creative: Do you have a sister? Can you slam dunk a basketball? Can you make Without direct instruction, my students were engaging in creative thought. However, the lac k of direction also illuminated the problem of student misconceptions about art and nature. I found that my questions helped them think through a problem more deeply than if I simply put them straight on the matter. T o illustrate, the thi rd graders were asked to sketch or photograph the creek from their favorite viewing location. Several students colored the water with a blue crayon During our next class, I asked the students to tell me the color of water After an array of responses (blu e! teal! no, it's baby blue! clear!) they looked at several artist's interpretations of water and then at a picture taken of the creek during the previous class. Soon the discussion changed to how to draw something that is clear, and as they returned to sk etch the creek again, they paid closer attention to the colors they were observing (Figure 4.1)
GO OUTSIDE 25 Figure 4.1. Drawing the Creek
GO OUTSIDE 26 Another example of student misconceptions c ame from a discussion I had with one of these third graders. Boy: (pointing at a piece of cement in the creek) like the way it feels. Me: You like the texture? How does it feel? Boy: Bumpy and smooth. Me: Is it a rock? Boy: Yeah. It looks like a rock and feels like a rock. Boy 2: (joining the conversation) Hey, this rock (pointing at another piece of cement in the creek) has a piece of metal stuck in it. Me: Is it a rock? Boy 3: (joining the conversation) It s cement. Boy 1: What do you mean? Why is there cement in the creek? Instead of explaining the phenomena my students were observing, I observed their actions and formulated questions; question s that would engage them in either creative or critical thought, to discover what impressions of nature they were making on their own. As I obse rved and listened to my student s responses I also discovered for myself the importance of using multiple forms of questions in inquiry based learning.
GO OUTSIDE 27 Follow the student's lead Over the course of this project, I was often confronted with the question, "What should my students be doing while they a re exploring?" Here is a reflection I wrote after our second day outside: How much do I reign in students who are not focused on the prompt, who instead have taken flights of fancy based on what they are finding? A group of fourth grade boys, instead of gathering soils and making observational drawings, engaged in role play of adventuring into the wild. They had a storyline started and had gathered water in plastic bags, because, as we all know, you need water in the wilderness. Some of the kindergarteners were sure they had found Bigfoot's footprint and others argued ov er whether they had found a dinosaur fossil or a tree root. To what extent do I try to refocus these students, or do I let them follow their imaginations? I eventually came to the conclusion that if students were engaged in observation or creative thought brought about from their experience in nature, their activity met the criteria of exploration; whether or not it had to do with the prompt they were given. The prompt became a jumping off point instead of an absolute. Student Engagement As this project p rogressed it became clear to me that the second question; "In what ways will outdoor exploration engage students in artistic inquiry and how will it inform their art practices?" needed to be broken down into two distinct parts The first was the impact of the discovery phase where the students explor ed observ ed and imagin ed.
GO OUTSIDE 28 The children discover ed the aesthetic attributes of objects and experiences As students explore d the area, they became very in tune with their surroundings. In reflecting on the objects they were drawn to, I was surprised by how much their sense of touch and smell played a role in the experience. First and for e most they were drawn to the creek. Several students commented on how much they enjoyed climbing down the bank, touc hing the water, or simply sitting and listening to it run. A close second was a plant commonly called lamb's ear, a groundcover that looks and feels like velvet. But the students were not just drawn to objects that felt good. T hey would touch the thistles to see if th ey pricked their fingers and were surprised when they touched them very softly, they didn't hurt at all. Some of the plants in the nature area we re herbs, planted by parent volunteers. I showed students how to rub their fingers on the undersi de of leaves, rather than pick them, to experience the intense smells of oregano, thyme, and lemon mint. They found this thrilling and quickly shared the experience with other students. Since the predominant colors in the nature area were shades of green a nd brown, any flowers blooming dre w the children in (Figure 4.2.) Dame's Rocket and Daisies were declared to be incredibly beautiful. Even knowing how children enjoy color, their response was surprising to me; these things seemed so simple, so ordinary. I t reminded me that artistic inquiry can start from the simplest of sensory experiences.
GO OUTSIDE 29 Figure 4.2 Flower Observations The children engaged in imaginary adventures. Exploring the nature area led several students to make up stories and act them out. One group of fourth grade boys imagined themselves lost in the wilderness, collected water in sealable bags made walking sticks, and covered their arms in mud as camouflag e. Walking the creek captured their imaginations as they climbed along the stones that line the bank. The boys spoke as if the creek was a trail leading to a magical place. The children sketche d from direct observation. I have not required my students to do very much observational drawing in the past, instead favoring learnin g through various art processes. I now see this as a mistake. Not only did the students enjoy drawing from nature several showed greater persistence in their work and a desire to und erstand what the objects looked like, what they were
GO OUTSIDE 30 called, and what their purpose was. Careful observation engaged the students in deeper inquiry and their drawings showed a greater understanding of structure. One first grader spent the entire class peri od focused on drawing a tree. He had started at ground level, and worked his way slowly up towards the leaves. As we headed back to the classroom, he told me that the tops of trees were very complicated and hard to draw (Figure 4.3) No wonder young children simplify trees to straight lines and circles. Simply contemplating drawing so many leaves was difficult, yet this first grader was trying to understand how it could be done.
GO OUTSIDE 31 Figure 4.3. First Grader Drawing a Tree The children i nvent ed names for plants and animals I perceived these dreamed up names as students' creative thought a claim to ownership and the beginning of a personal connection between the child and the object. For example, t he first graders, with a partner, choose a tree to study through their senses. I was surprised that most of the children, after choosi ng a tree, gave the tree a name,
GO OUTSIDE 32 similar to a name a child might give a pet animal; such as Bob, Treeme, or Fluf fy Whenever the students found insects or small animals, they spent some time giving them pet name s I thought about the connection between naming, titling, and ownership. My students both enjoy and struggle through titling their works of art and they se e this as a very important aspect of finishing their piece At conference time, telling their parents the title of a work is always the first chosen step; before even showing their parents the work of art. I saw this naming as an important step towards the children connecting with the natural world. The children built empathetic connections with nature and within the ir learning community. Having the freedom to explore, with the knowledge that they were to not harm the animals or plants, led my students to exhibit greater sensitivity both for the natural world and for each other. Instead of running and yelling, the children tread ed carefully, looked closely at nature, and became increasingly interested in natural patterns and systems. The second graders, gi ven the prompt to sketch patterns they found, came to the conclusion that all things in nature have pattern s ; you simply needed to be observant. The children were particularly gentle with the insects they found. They were empathetic towards ants carrying t heir eggs, which they discover ed when turning over some rocks. The children insisted that no one interfere wi th the ants' activity, and then gently placed the rock back in its original spot. Fifth grade girls adopted earthworms they found, named them, and placed them back in the soil after holding and petting them (Figure 4.4)
GO OUTSIDE 33 Figure 4.4 Insect and Animal Observations
GO OUTSIDE 34 This sensitivity towa rds nature carried over into personal relationships. Not once did I have a problem with students arguing, hurting each other, or feeling left out. I did however, have difficulty with several fifth graders being more interested in each other than in exploring the area. In my daily ref lections I wrote: Frustration with fifth graders again. Several never settle in to draw or even engage with their surroundings; instead they engaged with each other I witnessed several small bumps and abrasions all caused by a lack of observation. Of course, fifth grade students are very social, growing quickly and can be less coordinated at times. At fifth grade, the social component is huge. I overcame this problem by giving th e fifth graders a group project to create a plan to rejuvenate the nature area. When their focus was on working together, they paid closer attention to the task at hand. All of the students became more aware of the art istic process through their explora tions. The second part of the question, "In what ways will outdoor exploration engage students in artistic inquiry and how will it inform their art practices?" dealt with applying their discoveries to the ir understanding of art From this st udy, I found my students constructin g knowledge of how artists think and work. Artists make personal choices in what they create. In my daily reflections I wrote: I am seeing my students through new eyes. What interests them? I am focused on what they do what they lear n, instead of what I teach. In studying
GO OUTSIDE 35 what they do, I learn to adjust what I do. Of course I have done this as a matter of course, but somehow this is different. Before I was interested in improving student behavior and the quality of their trying to see what will engage them in the creative process because they WANT to be engaged in it. Explor ing nature offered the students choice s in subject matter. They gravitated to different areas, engaged in different activities, observed different phe nomena, and gathered differ ent objects. This is how artists work; choosing ideas and materials from personal experience. Materials have both multiple uses and limitations. Nature is a great resource for art materials and my students began to see the creat ive potential for using natural resource s in their work. Having charged them with not harming any living thing, they quickly gleaned that what they could use were objects lying on the ground, water from the creek, and loose dirt. After exploring the area, the fourth graders wanted to make what they labeled Mud Art during their next art class I was very apprehensive about allowing this activity, with thoughts of angry parental e mails, but it was one of the highlights of this study. With minimal materials, the students showed great diversity in their approac hes to using dirt to create art. They pour ed water down a mud encrusted board mimicking a river through mountains, used sand and clay modeling techniques added fallen objects, adher ed fallen leaves to a tree, made hand stam ps and painted designs on the trees, and stenciled leaves onto paper combining printmaking with painting techniques. Most interesting to me were their created habitats for b irds and worms which I saw as an opening to
GO OUTSIDE 36 introduce eco art principles to the students. However, the children also learned what dirt could not do ; they discovered that the mud objects fell apart as they dried, to paint with dirt they needed to mix it with a lot of water, and only certain types of dirt worked well at adhering objects (Figure 4.5) Figure 4.5 Using Dirt to Create Art
GO OUTSIDE 37 Materials can be found objects. M y students were quite used to me providing them specific materials and tools in their art maki ng. Exploring the natural world let them see that art materials do not need to be purchased or provided but can be found in the environment. Several students realized the potential of disca rded litter which they could recycle into art objects Collected objects and ob servations can be used in what you create. Artists are collectors, and their collections play an important role in what they create. The kindergarteners went on a sensory scavenger hunt, gathering small objects off the ground that appealed to their senses. They brought these objects, which became very precious to them, back to the art room. During the c lass after their scavenger hunt they built structures from their collected objects, and then chose one or two to adhere to a drawing they made which illustra ted their outdoor exploration (Figure 4.6.) I was surprised that these natural objects held their meaning from week to week, as the children knew what they had collected and wanted to take them home.
GO OUTSIDE 38 Figure 4.6 Kindergarten Building and Pastel Collage Planning and/or mapping can be an important step in the creative process. Artists work in many different ways, and creating a plan is one method. The fifth grade rs planned out and mapped improvements to our nature area. I asked them to
GO OUTSIDE 39 think both realistically, and fancifully. They worked in small groups, and then shared their ideas with the class. Several girls came up with the idea of forming a nature club that would come to the area and help with the actual renovations. This led to an interesting discussion about the ro le humans play in forming and maintaining natural areas a nd questioning which was better; to leave nature alone or play a role in sustaining a certain environ ment. The fifth graders realized, a s artists working wi thin nature, careful planning would be an important first step for improving the school's nature area. They would need to consider the resources, agree on a design, and plan a work schedule. Lessons Learned This action research study answered many of my questions about using outdoor exploration in the framework of inquiry based art education model I had long used a format of direct instruction for introducing art projects and processes to my student s. I perceived this method to be flawed, but was not sure what direction I should take to improve my teaching. By implementing exper iential, discovery, and inquiry based learning strategies, my students developed a better understanding of the creative proc ess, and I improved my teaching practice. The children learned that art involves engagement in sensory experiences, personal choice in activity, sensitive observation s imagination and discovery By switching my role as teacher to fellow explorer, I discovered that "teaching" art requires loosening my perception of control over what students do and what students learn By embracing the unknown, the uncertain, the ambiguous we became fellow explorers, which revitalized my desire to teach. This study helped me reconcile my beliefs about
GO OUTSIDE 40 teaching and learning with the methods I use in the classroom, and within my newfound outdoor arena.
GO OUTSIDE 41 Chapter 5: Discussion A Needed Strategy in Art Education The premise of this study began with my belief that children need to spend more time in nature for their own well being, for their understanding of art concepts, and to help them develop an empathetic stance towards the natural world. Taking children outside to explore seemed such a simple strategy for learning these things, yet I did not know how to implement the strategy successfully. In reflecting back on this study, I went through several revisions of how to present the concept of artistic exploration to the students, how to prepare for learning outside the classroom, how to keep students focus ed on that learning, and how to assess what they had learned. Outdoor exploration required a great deal of preparation and flexibility combined with caref ul observation and reflection on student activity. The ambiguity of this strategy in that students we re not given specified learning methods or outcomes required my students to be bo th responsible and thoughtful. In my mind, t he results were profound in that they changed my understanding of how to teach elementary art, they showed how inquiry led my stud ents to better comprehend artistic concepts and processes, and demonstrated a way for children to reconnect with nature. For several years I struggled with students viewing art as a time when they get to make something and nothing more The experience of exploring and observing helped them see the role that nature can play in their art and aesthetic encounters As I interviewed individual students, I saw how these experiences led the students to view art as meaningful and experimental. Switching from the role of presenter and advisor to fellow inquirer and explorer took a shift in
GO OUTSIDE 42 my thought process about how children learn and what they need to learn. Exploring nature with its varied sensory experiences piqued my students' curiosity captured their imagination, and engaged them in careful observation of environmental phenomena By providing learning opportunities through creative prompts instead of through direct instruction, my students and I discovered an alternative and exciting app roach to learning about both art and nature In looking back at the first research question about the essential factors needed to engage students in outdoor exploration I had understood the importance of safety at the outset, but not my need to embrace t he ambiguous situations that arose during those explorations. Implementing an exploratory strategy in an uncontrolled environment made precise planning difficult; instead I had to prepare my students and myself for the unknown. I had to change my point of view from seeing my students as an age defined group that would benefit from learning specific art concepts and processes, to a diverse group of ind ividual artists T he second research question that asked how outdoor exploration would engage the chi ldren i n artistic inquiry and understanding of art processe s helped me see my students as artists who could make their own choices in what they created Nature was the bearer of sensory experience s which inspired these artists much more than a concept or process I had chosen to meet a specific learning target. The children had the freedom to explore and experiment with their own ideas which sparked greater creativity in the artistic process. Verifying of the Value of Outdoor Exploration
GO OUTSIDE 43 In considering the pr ofessional literature written about the importance of outdoor exploration, this study confirmed that this strategy engage d children in observation, inquiry, and environmental awareness. Although conducted over a short period of time, the students made visu al and verbal observations about sensory experiences, questioned these experiences, and developed greater empathy for living things. It was also apparent, as seen in the results section of this study, that students drew inspiration from nature for their ar twork, and developed a better understanding of the role natural objects and processes play in creating art. The results also suggested that the students' experiences could be interpreted as the beginning steps towards develop ing a mutually beneficial relat ionship with nature, as found in Louv's study (2007 ) and that the students started learn ing to be environmental stewards as found in Inwood's research (2010) For instance, t he students showed concern about the garbage t hey found in the creek and planned how to make the nature area more attractive to both humans and animals. The pr ofessional literature also focused on how outdoor exploration could help students make connections between science and art concepts through inquiry. In order to examine this theory, I looked at my interpreted science objectives used in creating the lesson plans for this st udy (Appendix A ). My students were actively engaged in asking ques tions about the natural world with questions such as : W h y do insects live under rocks ? W hy don't they get squished by the rock? Why does the thistle plant have thorns? Students had many questions about how nature worked They conducted simple investigations, such as lifting and replacing the rocks several times to see how that a ffected the insects. They observed how different objects
GO OUTSIDE 44 thrown in water behaved differently. The kindergarteners took great delight in collecting and curating the natural objects that they found. Students were interested in learning the common names of natural objec ts, and I could hear them sharing that knowledge amongst their peers. Several fourth graders described their mud creations as "habitats" for birds and worms, supplying their interpretations of shelter, food, and water. I overheard first graders talking abo ut the life cycle of their adopted trees and the seed "babies" the trees were dropping. In many ways, this study revealed the close connection between artistic and scientific inquiry. Potential Bias and Limitations of the Study T his study was conducted as a form of action research, meant to improve the way I teach, so the results are personally valid in that they opened my eyes to a very different way to approach art education. As a result of this study, I plan to implement inquiry based outdoor exploration regularly into my teaching, giving students sensory experiences on which they can form their own artistic creations Their interest in examining natural phenomena will help them understand the principles of eco art, and hopefully begin to build a symbioti c relationship with the natural world. It is my desire that other elementary art teachers analyze this research in order to implement outdoor exploration into their own practice I obviously have a strong bias towards developing a thoughtful, sensitive co mmunity of learners that will come to understand the need to sustain and protect our natura l world. There are many artist educators such as Inwood (2010) and ( Strauch Nelson 1012) that share this desire. I tried to design this study, however, to allow my students to draw their own conclusions and investigate art and nature
GO OUTSIDE 45 without being told the issues of environmental conce rn. Waite's ( 2011 ) study supports the theory that children first needed to hold an empathetic view of nature before exposing them to the concerns of climate change. Applying the results of this research to other elementary teachers situations and students is possible with several limitin g factors. My school's location was optimal for safety, accessibility to a natural environment, and allowing for classes to explore with in a limited time frame. This is certainly not the case for all elementary schools. The natural environment was specific to central Iowa, so the study would have looked very different in another location such as a coastal, desert, or inner city environment The student body studied reflected children from diverse backgrounds, although none had physical disabilities that ke pt them from participating. Our nature area would not have been accessible to students using wheelchairs although a student on crutches managed to maneuver through the area with the help of friends Questions for Further Study I am left, however, with two known unresolved issues The first pertains to the assessment of student learning during their explorations, and the second to the possible detrimental effects their explorations could have on the area Although I collected anecdotal reflections photographs, and video of the children during this study, I did not assess the students individually beyond asking them questions about what they were doing and documenting their activities through photographs Although I have collected formative assessmen ts through discussions with students in the past, my primary mode of assessing student achievement has been through
GO OUTSIDE 46 the examination of their art projects. The production of art was not the aim of this study; it was to engage students in artistic inquiry. A s objectives are tied to assessments, I needed to place a value on student engagement in the experience, not on the final product, and document the learning that occurred during that experience. I did not have the students individually self assess their ex periences during the study, and I see this as a possible validity issue as to the results of the study. Student engagement could be assessed by having the children complete a checklist or short answer form about their experiences. Th e issue of student asse ssment require s more research evaluation and reflection on my part The second unresolved issue pertains to the students effect on the nature area. Taking over six hundred children into a relatively small area led to some deterioration of the soil and gr asses in the area. This may seem a trivial point, in that grasses in Iowa grow quickly, but in the grander scheme of nature, overuse has led to many problems of erosion and damage to the environment. How ironic then, that in an attempt to reconnect childre n with the natural world their presence, in large numbers, c ould lead to environmental destruction This issue needs further examination. The Big Picture This was a small study of one elementary school's population engaging in outdoor exploration during the month of May, 2012 The research that was conducted and interpreted played an important role in changing the way that I teach; shift ing from a direct instruction al format to an experiential, inquiry based model that considers how students learn above t rying to disseminate information to
GO OUTSIDE 47 them. Other elementary art teachers may benefit from this study and learn to incorporate outdoor inquiry based learning into their own programs. Outdoor exploration needs to be reintroduced into the art education practic e not just to improve elementary teaching methods although that is a worthy goal, but for the benefit of future generations. Today's c hildren lead lives that are filled with scheduled and media driven activities, with little time or encouragement to develo p their own questions and ideas ; while the natural world is in need of a sensitive, informed humanity. Improving the lives of children by allowing them to explore the natural world through artistic inquir y, and creating sensitive environmentalists at the same time, is an idealistic premise, and not easily implemented in a school system based on standardized testing, time units and large class sizes. Yet, as this study finds, it is possible to incorporate aesthetic experience s in nature into the time f rame of an elementary art class engaging children once more in the wonder that is our natural world.
GO OUTSIDE 48 References Art21 (2012). S tarting the conversation [Website]. Retrieved from http://www.art21.org/teach/on contemporary art/starting the conversation Blandy, D., Congdon, K. G., & Krug, D. H. (1998). Art, ecological restoration, and art education. Studies in Art Education, 39 (3), 230 243. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/1320366 Blandy, D., & Hoffman, E. (1993). Toward an art education of place. Studies in Art Education, 35 (1), 22 33 Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/1320835 Carter, D. (1975). Annihilating Environmental Anesthesia. Art Education. 28 (2). 2 5. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/3192031 Center for Ecoliteracy. (2011). Discover [Website]. Retrieved http://www.ecoliteracy.org/ Chambers, J. ed. (2011) Encyclopedia of American education [Online]. Retrieved from http://american education.org/20 42 sheldon edward a 18231897.html Chessin, D., & Zander, M. (2006). The nature of science and art. Science Scope 29 (8), 42 6. Retrieved from Education Full Text database Cowan, D. & Dolgoy, R. (1984). Educating vision. Art E ducation, 37 (5), 30 31. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/3216164 Dewey, J. (1934). Art as experience New York: Perigee Books.
GO OUTSIDE 49 Dirnberger, J. (2006). Drawing on nature. Science Scope 29 (8), 47 8. Retrieved from Education Full Text database Dykstra, P. (2008 Decembe r 10 ). History of environmental movement full of twists turns. CNNTech Retrieved from http://articles.cnn.com/2008 12 10/tech/ history.environmental.movement _1_fierce green fire american environmental movement philip shabecoff? _s= PM:TECH Ferrance, E. (2000). Action research [PDF]. Providence: Brown University Retrieved from http://www.lab.brown.edu/pubs/themes_ed/act_research.pdf Gillenwater, M. (1969). Outdoor education: A coat of many colors! Peabody Journal of Education, (46) 5, 311 315. Ret rieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/1491405 Greenmuseum.org. (2010). What is environmental art? [Website]. Retrieved from http://greenmuseum.org/ Hansen, E. (2009). Island ecology: An exploration o f place in the elementary art curriculum. Art Education 62 (6), 46 51. Retrieved from Education Full Text database Hawkins, D. & Vinton, D. (1970). Environmental education. Art Education, 23 (7), 48 52. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/3191505 Inwood, H. (2007) Artistic approaches to eco logical literacy: Developing eco art education in elementary classrooms [PDF] Retrieved from http://www.uiowa.edu/~srae/workingpapers/2007/documents/07_ Inwood_Hillary Paper.pdf
GO OUTSIDE 50 Inwood, H. (2009). Artistic approaches to environmental education: Developing eco art education in elementary classrooms Retrieved from http://www.hilaryinwood.ca/research_menu.html Inwood, H. (2010). Shades of green: Growing environmentalism through art education. Art Education 63 (6), 33 38. Retrieved from Education Full Text database Inwood, H. (2010). Hilary Inwood.ca: Art, education and environment [Website]. Retrieved from http://www.hilaryinwood.ca/ Kauppinen, H. (1990). Environmental Aesthetics and Art Education. Art Education 43 (4), 12 21. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/3193211 Krug, D. & Cohen Evron, N. (2000). Curriculum integration positions and practices in art education. Studi es in Art Education, 41 (3), 258 275. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/1320380 Lai, A. & Ball, E. (2002). Home is where the art is: exploring the places people live through art education. Studies in Art Education, 44 (1), 47 66. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/1321048 Louv, R. (2007). No child left inside. [O nline exclusive]. Orion magazine Retrieved from http://www.orionmagazine.org/index.php/articles/article/240 Madeja, S. (1976). The CEMREL aesthetic education program: A report Journal of Aesthetic Education 10 (3/4), 209 216. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/3332073
GO OUTSIDE 51 Marshall, J. (2004). Articulate images: Bringing the pictures of science and natural history into the art curriculum. Studies in Art Education 45 (2), 135 152. Retrieved from Education Full Text database Marshall, J. (2005). Connecting art, learning, and creativity : a case for curriculum integration. Studies in Art Education, 46 (3), 227 241. Retrieved from Education Full Text database Marshall, J. (2010). Five ways to integrate: Using strategies from contemporary art. Art Education 63 (3), 13 19. Retrieved from Education Full Text database McFarland, K. P., & Stansell, J. C. (1993). Historical perspectives. In L. Patterson, C. M. S anta, C. G. Short, & K. Smith (Eds.), Teachers are researchers: Reflection and action Newark, DE: International Reading Association Miraglia, K., & Smilan, C. (2009). Lessons learned from the landscape: an integrated approach. International Journal of Education Through Art 5 (2/3), 169 85. doi: 10.1386/eta.5.2and3.169/1 NCU (2009). Foundations of agricultural and extension education. Retrieved from http://www.cals.ncsu.edu/agexed/aee501/pestalozzi.html Nelson, M. & Chandler, W. (1999). Some tools common to art and science. Art Education, 52 (3), 41 47. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/3193803 Neperud, R. (1973). Art Education: Towards an Environmental Aesthetic Art Education. Art Education 26 (3), 6 10. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/3191886 Neperud, R. (1997). Art, ecology, and art education: Practices & linkages. Art
GO OUTSIDE 52 Education, 50 (6), 14 20. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/3193683 Osterman, K. & Kottkamp, R. (1993). Reflective practice for educators: Improving schooling t hrough professional development [PDF]. Newbury Park, California: Corwin Press, Inc. Retrieved from http://www.fgse.nova.edu/edl/secure/mats/rdgelach2.pdf Painter, D. (2 009). Teacher and action research [W ebsite]. Retrieved from http://gse.gmu.edu/research/tr/ Pur ser, R. (1978). The Historical dimension of environmental design e ducation. Art Education 31 (4). 13 15. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/3192265 Riel, M. (2011). Understanding action research. Center for Collaborative A ction Research [Website]. Retrieved from http://cadres.pepperdine.edu/ccar/define.html Sabol, F. (2010). No child left behind: A study of its impact on art education. The AEP Wire [O nline exclusive] Retrieved from http://www.aeparts.org/AEP%20WIRE/AEP%20Wire%20092010%20Sabo l%20 NCLB.pdf Smith, K. (2008). H ow to be an explorer of the w orld New York: Penguin Group. Song, Y. (2010). Art in nature and schools: Nils Udo. The Journal of Aesthetic Education 44 (3), 96 108. doi: 10.1353/jae.2010.0003 Strauch Nelson, W. (2012). Transplanting Froebel into the present. International Journal of Education through Art, 8 (1). D oi: 10.1386/eta.8.1.59_1
GO OUTSIDE 53 Tatarchuk, S. & Eick, C. (2011). Outdoor integration. Science and Children 48 (6), 35 9. Retrieved from Education Full Text database Thurber, F. (1997). A site to behold: creating curricula a bout local urban environmental art. Art Education, 50 (6), 33 39. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/3193686 Turnbull, M. (2011). Seed gathering. Unpublished study. Twenty first Century Schools. (2010). Ecoliteracy Retrieved from http://www.21stcenturyschools.com/index.htm Ulbricht, J. (1998). Changing c once pts of environmental art education: Toward a broader d efinition. Art Education 51 (6). 22 34. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/3193748 Waters A Waite, S. (2011). C hildren l earning o utside the c lassroom London, England: Sage Publications Inc. Waters Adams, S. (2006) Action research in education [Website]. Retrieved from http://www.edu.plymouth.ac.uk/resined/actionresearch/arhome.htm Weigand, H. (1985). From science into art. Art Education, (38) 6, 18 21. Retrieved from http ://www.jstor.org/stable/3192873 Zhu, X. & Lee, Chanam. (2008) Walkability and safety around elementary schools : Economic and Ethnic Disparities. American Journal of Preventive Medicine 34 (4), 282 290.
GO OUTSIDE 5 4 Appendix A The Waukee, Iowa elementary science c urriculum standard, Science as Inquiry as I i nterpreted it for art inquiry into nature. 1 Kindergarten: Use tools to gather data and extend the senses. Name and use simple tools. Use simple tools to explore nature. Use data to construct reasonable explanations. Make predictions. Make observations about nature. Communicate investigations and explanations orally, in writing, or through drawings. Communicate investigations and explanations orally and through drawings. Communicate observations of nature through artistic processes. First Grade: Ask questions about objects, organisms, and events in the environment Ask questions about the natural world Ask questions about the natural world. Plan and conduct simple investigations. C onduct simple investigations. Conduct simple investigations in the natural world. Use tools to gather data and extend the senses. Name and use simple tools and gather data. Collect, curate, and present sensory images and objects from nature. Use data to construct reasonable explanations. Make predictions based on observations. Make observations about nature. Communicate investigations and explanations orally, in writing, or through drawings. Communicate investigations and explanations in writing. Communi cate observations of nature through artistic processes. 1 Color coded black for Waukee science curriculum standard Science as inquiry and corresponding benchmarks. Color coded blue for Waukee science curriculum objectives. Color coded green for interpreted, corresponding art inquiry into nature objectives.
GO OUTSIDE 55 Second Grade: Ask questions about objects, organisms, and events in the environment. Seek answers by making careful observations. Ask questions about natural objects and events. Plan and conduct simple investigations. Plan and conduct simple investigations. Plan and conduct simple investigations of nature. Use tools to gather data and extend the senses. Name and use simple tools and gather data to construct reasonable explanatio ns. Collect, curate, and present sensory images and objects from nature. Use data to construct reasonable explanations. Make predictions based on observed patterns. Observe, collect, and analyze patterns in nature. Communicate investigations and explana tions orally, in writing, or through drawings. Communicate observations of nature through artistic processes. Third Grade Identify and generate questions that can be answered through scientific investigation. Create questions from explorations in nature. Plan and conduct simple investigations. Plan and conduct simple investigations of nature. Use appropriate tools and techniques to gather, process, analyze and interpret data. Experiment using tools and scientific techniques. Experiment with natural art tools, materials and processes. Use evidence to develop reasonable explanations. Curate artwork made from natural objects and observations. Communicate scientific procedures and explanations. Communicate observations of nature through artistic processes. Recognize that scientists perform different types of investigations. Recognize that artists perform different types of investigations.
GO OUTSIDE 56 Fourth Grade Identify and generate questions that can be answered through scientific investigation. Identify question s that can be answered through scientific investigations. Create questions from explorations in nature. Plan and conduct simple investigations. Plan and conduct simple investigations of nature. Use appropriate tools and techniques to gather, process, ana lyze and interpret data. Experiment with natural art tools, materials and processes. Use evidence to develop reasonable explanations. Curate and present artwork made from natural objects and observations. Communicate scientific procedures and explanations Communicate observations of nature through artistic processes. Recognize that scientists perform different types of investigations. Generate an inquiry question; identify an investigation to answer the question. Recognize that artists perform different types of investigations. Fifth Grade Identify and generate questions that can be answered through scientific investigation. Create questions to explore in nature. Plan and conduct simple investigations. Design and conduct a scientific invest igation to answer questions. Plan and conduct simple investig ations of nature to answer questions. Use appropriate tools and techniques to gather, process, analyze and interpret data. Use tools and scientific techniques to make better observations. Experi ment with natural art tools, materials and processes. Use evidence to develop reasonable explanations. Use data to construct reasonable explanations. Curate and present artwork made from natural objects and observations. Communicate scientific procedures and explanations. Analyze scientific procedures and explanations. Communicate observations of nature through artistic processes.
GO OUTSIDE 57 Recognize that scientists perform different types of investigations. Recognize that artists perform different types of investigations.
GO OUTSIDE 58 Appendix B Here are some s uggested prompts for outdoor exploration These prompts are divided into grade levels, however many could be used at any grade level. Some were i nspired by Keri Smith 's How to be an Explorer of the World (2008) Prompt s were devised based on the concept that both artists and scientists observe, collect, analyze, compare, and notice p atterns. Kindergarten: Go on a sensory scavenger hunt. Collect small objects and sort by shape, texture, color, etc. Use to create a mosaic or collage. Make colored goggles. Take a walk and see the world like an artist Collect sounds, smells, sights, and textures. Paint with water on different surfaces. Put a painting out in the rain and watch it change. Curate and present collections of natural objects First Grade: Befriend a tree. Use all your senses to explore the tree. Make a rubbing from the bark and leaves Gather fallen tree parts and experiment with them as tools and materials. Document faces you find in nature using a camera or sketchbook. Collect a certain natural object in abundance (for example: fallen leaves). Play with them and create from them. Cover paper with Vaseline. Take a walk on a windy day, holding up the paper to create a chance collage of windblown objects. Gather pinecones or burrs and make a sculpture from them. Second Grade: Explore in an altered state: through colored goggles and from a topsy turvy viewpoint. Collect and document found patterns. Incorporate found patterns in artworks. Match a paint chip color to a natural object. Draw the object on the paint chip. Collect several. Take a sensory trust walk. One friend leads another blindfolded friend to feel natural objects. Make shapes from cardboard. Place in the grass for several days. Remove the cardboard. Or place natural objects on construction paper outside in the sun to create a sun print. Artists notice things. Collect shadows in a sketchbook. Third Grade:
GO OUTSIDE 59 Experiment with water as a process, a tool, and a medium. Collect stream and/or pond water in a jar. Bring inside and place it in the sun. Document the changes with a camera or sketchbook. Watch water. Sketch the motion, light, and reflections. Document the shapes you see in water. Find art in natu re. Take a photograph of what is beautiful to you. Gather seeds and use them to make a mosaic. Fourth Grade: Explore natural dirt and mud. Use them to create something. Combine them with other natural objects. Make pigments from found natural materials. U se them to paint and draw. Compare found objects that are nature made, human made, and a combination of the two. Gather different types of leaves and make prints. Look at nature upside down. Try drawing upside down. Lie down under a tree and look up. Draw what you see. Make an outdoor weaving from natural found objects. Fifth Grade: Sketch what is seen within a viewfinder. Create an artwork from these observations. Choose a one cubic foot area of nature. Sketch the space over several days and weeks. Record your thoughts and questions about what you see, hear, and touch. Record everything you consume in one day in writing and images. Create a tactile map of a natural area from found natural objects. Collect natural objects and make up a story about the m. Design and construct and artwork made from natural materials.
GO OUTSIDE 60 Appendix C Teacher Kit: To be brought by the art educator: A c ell phone or Walkie Talkie to communicate with building administrator or classroom teacher A whistle A f irst aid kit A s et of labeled digital cameras for students to check out Several buckets with trowels and cups for collecting A camera, video camera, digital voice recorder, and tripod for recording explorations S ome s tring A pair of s cissors A p encil sharpener Several magnifying g lasses Some r ubber gloves S ome s mall garbage bags for collecting trash Some old towels for wiping off hands Exploration kits for each student: A bag or backpack to carry materials An o ilcloth squares to sit on if ground is w et or damp A clipboard with stock of sketch paper A case for pencils, erasers, and crayons Two or three pencils and erasers A s et of crayons Two or three gallon sealable bags A viewfinder Note: After two days of student explorations, the student kits were no longer used. To make materials more manageable for children, each child carried a clipboard with paper and each pair of students shared a sealable bag of crayons. Extra bags, viewfinders, and pencils were added to the teacher kit. When it was damp, two students carried the oilcloth squares to the area.
GO OUTSIDE 61 Appendix D Lesson Plan Rationale: Students at my school were not familiar wi th outdoor art explorations. This first lesson was designed to orient students to the area, explain the expectations for behavior and learning, and included a brief inquiry based art lesson Each grade level was given different, age appropriate prompt s followed by time to observe and explore the natural areas near our school building. Objective: Artistic inquiry through outdoor exploration Supplies: Teacher kit, a box of pencils, oilcloth squares if the ground is wet, sealable bags with crayons for each pair of students, and a clipboard with paper or a sketchbook and a gallon seala ble bag for each student. Step by Step: 1. Gather supplies. 2. Prior to leaving the building, explain the whistle signals for both listening to instruction and regrouping and discuss these two questions : Why are insects and animals outside? What shoul d you do when you meet an insect or animal? 3. Lead the students outside, briefly touring the area to be explored, and then form a group circle for instruction. 4 Have students sit and close their eyes in silence. Ask them what they hear, and what they smell. T ell them to touch the ground next to them. Ask them what they feel. Have t hem open their eyes and look up towards the sky and ask what they see. 5 Explain the idea of exploring things in nature that attract our senses. Have the students run their fingers through the grass again. Tell them when they find something they like to as k themselves: Why do I like this or why don't I like this? Which of my senses does it affect ? 6. Ask the students w hich sense they shouldn't us e when exploring. Discuss why tasting natural objects is not allowed. 7 Explain and discuss the prompt s Kindergarteners will explore the nature a rea in a sensory scavenger hunt.
GO OUTSIDE 62 PROMPTS: What do you notice first? Which natural objects in the nature area are you attracted to? Which ones can you collect? First Graders will explore the nature area and arboretum to discover and sketch the uniqueness of a single a tree. Model drawing a tree from your mind's eye compared to drawing a specific tree from o bservation. Have students practice making branch shapes with their arms by looking at a specific tree. PROMPTS: What makes your tree special? What question would you ask your tree? How can you draw your tree so that others see what makes it special to you ? Second Grade rs will explore the nature area and arboretum looking for and documenting natural patterns. Model finding and sketching a natural pattern. PROMPTS: What is a pattern? On what natural objects do you find patterns? How many different natural patterns c an you sketch on your paper? Third Graders will explore, observe and sketch the water in the creek area. Ask students to solve this riddle: What do we need to survive that artists use but find challenging to dra w and paint ? Then discuss the q uestion : Why are artists fascinated by water? Explain that they are to observe the stream carefully and try to draw what they see. Model drawing water from your mind's eye compared to drawing from observation. PROMPTS: How can you dra w the water in the creek? What color is water? Fourth graders will explore the nature area, arboretum, and creek to collect and experiment with dirt in making artworks. (They will need some extra supplies including buckets, trowels, and old paintbrushes.) Ask the students where clay comes from. What is clay? What do artists do with clay? Are there other types of dirt ? How do you think artists could use dirt? PROMPT: How can yo u use dirt in making an artwork? Fifth graders will explore the nature area, ar boretum, and creek to plan and design improvements to the area. Discuss the following questions: What makes this a nice place to be sitting? Could we improve it? Could we make it worse? PROMPT: How can you improve this area in a way that will benefit the p lants and animals that live here AND make it more appealing to your senses?
GO OUTSIDE 63 8 Show the students the area boundaries. 9 Give the expectations: Stay with your buddy. Stay in the boundaries. Be responsible for your supplies Be gentle with nature. Do not pick any plants or hurt any creatures. Think about what you are exploring what do you see? What do you hear? What do you touch? Be aware of what is around you. Regroup at the meeting spot when you hear the whistle. 10 Give the consequences of not f ollowing the expectations. Students not following the expectations will be given a tree stop They must put one hand on a tree chosen by the teacher and remain there until the teacher instructs them to return to their exploration. Students that continue t o not follow the expectations after a tree stop will be sent inside to sit in the office. 11. Restate the prompt. 12 Students explore the area based on the prompt or other creative or artistic experience. 13 Regroup at the whistle signal. 14 If ti me, s hare favorite objects sketches or experiences. Discuss how they can apply what they learned to creating art. 15 Return to the classr oom and put away the materials and supplies
GO OUTSIDE 64 Biographical Sketch Melinda Turnbull has been teaching elementary art in the Waukee, Iowa Community Schools District since 2003. She is a graduate of West High School in Madison, Wisconsin, The University of Wisconsin with a degree in Art History in 1982, and Iowa State Unive rsity with a degree in Elementary Education in 2002. A lifelong participant in the arts, Melinda has enjoyed a variety of creative experiences, from drawing and painting to wheel throwing, and from playing the piano to directing children's theater producti ons. Melinda lived for six years in Hungary and Thailand where volunteer work in the international schools inspired her to become a teacher. Her hobbies include hiking with her two dogs, commuting to school by bicycle, gardening with her husband, and vol unteering at a local outdoor museum of agriculture.