United States foreign trade

a',


.D R .E P O T J U Y E M R 6F O R R E L E A S E
MMART REPORT JANUARY-DECEMBER 1962 October 15, 1963
|l,6 cobr1,16


WATERBORNE FOREIGN TRADE STATISTICS

COVERAGE


This report resents statistical year figures on total United
States waterborne Inbound and outbound shipments made in
foreign trade, with the exception of such elements as are
specified below. Statistical year figures represent the
aggregate of transactions processed during the twelve monthly
Statistical periods January-December including some ship-
ments unladen from and laden on vessels during the latter
part of the previous year and omitting some late shipments
made during the current year for which information was not
received. in time to be included in the statistical year
figures Calendar year figures represent shipments unladen
fSam and laddn on vessels arriving or departing during the
Inateral January 1-December 31 (excluding late transactions
free the previous year which are included in the statistical
yeart figures and including late 'transactions made during the
.current year which are excluded from the statistical year
figures). Both calendar and statistical year issues of
Report FT 985 were published for the years 1952 through 1960;
bowverthe calendar year publication was discontinued after
the 1960 release. For a fuller explanation of thi differences
between statistical and calendar year figures see the July
1952 issue.of Foreign Trade Statistics Notes.

Te waterborne statistics presented in the monthly issues of
this report excluded completely exports of domestic and for-
eign merchandise, and non-Department of Defense shipments of
"Special Category" onmmodities valued at (a) less than $500
through 1955 and beginning with July 1956 and (b) less than
41,000 for the period Januaty-June 1956. In addition, im-
port dbipmenta of under 2,000 pounds regardless of value as
well as shipments Trled at lees than $100 regardless of
shipping weight were excluded from the monthly issues of this
report through 1957. Starting with January 1958 statistics
the import data exclude only those shipments where the value
is less than $100, regardless of shipping weight. In order
to provide users of the vessel statistics with a series of
comparable. annual data on a statistical year basis, this re-
port shows, in addition to the detail for the fully compiled
shipment (comparable to the monthly data), total figures
(combining sample estimates of the low-value export ship-
ments with the complete coverage segments) on the United
States port level and trade area level. The total figures
for 1962, which include the estimates for exports, are com-
parable to the data shown for prior years.

The statistics on low-value-export shipments of domestic and
foreign merchandise are estimated on the basis of a 10 per-
cent sample of such shipments. A discussion of the low-value
export shipments in the vessel statistics is contained in the
November 1953 and February 1956 issues of Foreign Trade Sta-
tisates Notes. In addition, data on the shipping weight and
value of import shipments of under 2,000 pounds with a value
of $100 or more were estimated on the basis of a 2 percent
random sample of import documents through 1957. A discussion
of the low-weight or low-value import shipments in the vessel
statistics is contained in the March 1954 and January-March
1958 issues of the Foreign Trade Statistics Notes.

Veasel export figures in this report,shown in columns 5, 10,
16, and 19 of table I-and in table 3, represent exports of
domestic and foreign merchandise laden at the United States


Customs area (United States and Puerto Rico) for shipment to
foreign countries and include export shipments to United
States civilian government agencies and non-.Department of
Defense controlled foreign aid program shipments as described
below. Excluded from these figures are shipments to the
United States armed forces abroad of supplies and equipment
for their own use as well as the other types of shipments
described below for which information is shown in separate
columns in table 1,.

Department of Defense controlled and "Special Category"
figures, shown in columns 7 and 12 of table 1 and in tables
5 and 6 of this report cover consolidated data for the fol-
lowing types of shipments:

1. Vessel export shipments of Department of Defense
controlled cargo under special foreign aid programs
such as Depart~mee Military Assistance
Program--rant d on commercial or
military ve operated by De-
partment o0

2. Vessel e pments of "Spec tegory" commod-
ities no fled by theepa of Defense for
which de info t own separately
because uril For lanation and
list of i 1 Category" a ti nd their pres-
entation f ign trade stat i see January 1961
issue of Calendar Y issue of IFT 985.



Only shipping weight data in terms of United States port or
coastal district of lading are shown for these classes of
shipments since information on the dollar value of exports
of Department of Defense controlled cargo is not available
at this level of detail. Consequently, the total value fig-
ures shown in columns 15 and 18 of table 1 for dry cargo and
tanker shipments in that order correspond to the shipping
weight figures shown in columns 4 and 9, respectively, of
the same table.

Vessel import figures, shown in columns 3, 6, 10 and 13 of
table 2 and in table 4 of this report, are general imports
and represent the total of imports for immediate consumption
plus entries into customs bonded storage and manufacturing
warehouses made at the United States Customs area from for-
eign countries. Vessel import figures exclude American goods
returned by the United States armed forces for their own use,
import shipments on Army or Navy transports, and shipments
covered by informal entries.

The following types of shipments are excluded from both the
vessel export and import data: (1) All shipments of under
$100 in value, regardless of shipping weight; (2) shipments
of household and personal effects; (3) shipments by mail and
parcel post; and (4) shipments of vessels under their own
power and afloat. Trade between the United States and its
possessions and trade between the possessions are not re-
ported as United States exports and imports.


Prepared by the Bureau of the Census, Foreign Trade Division

For sale by the Bureau of the Census, Washington D.C. 20233. Price 10 copy.
Annual subscription (FT 900, 930, 950. 970, 975, 985, and 986 combined) 55.00.


United States

Foreign Trade


U. S. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
Luther H. Hodges, Secretary

BUREAU OF THE CENSUS
Richard M. Scammon, Director








2

Merchandise shipped in bond through the United States In
transit from one foreign country to another without having
been entered as an import is not included in any of the
figures in the columns previously referred to (imported mer-
chandise cleared through customs and subsequently re-exported
is included in both the import and export statistics). Sep-
arate information for the waterborne portionof thein-transit
trade in terms of shipping weight and dollar value is pre-
sented in this report in tables 1 and 2. Columns 6, 11, 17
and 20 of table 1 reflect in-transit merchandise laden aboard
vessels at United States ports, while columns 4, 7, 11 and
14 of table 2 reflect such merchandise unladen from vessels.
The waterborne outbound and inbound in-transit statistics
include: (1) foreign merchandise transferred from one vessel
to another in the United States port of arrival and shipped
to a foreign country without being released from customs
custody in the United States; and (2) foreign merchandise
arriving by vessel at one United States port,shipped through
the United States under customs bond, and leaving the United
States by vessel from a port other than that at which it
arrived. In addition, the waterborne outbound in-transit
statistics also include (1) foreign merchandise withdrawn
from a general order warehouse for immediate export by vessel
or for transportation and export by vessel (such merchandise
was not recorded as an import when it entered the warehouse),
and (2) foreign merchandise shipped by vessel from a United
States Foreign Trade Zone to a foreign country (such mer-
chandise is deposited in the Foreign Trade Zone without being
entered as an import). Any inbound or outbound in-transit
merchandise moving by methods of transportation other than
vessel is excluded from the in-transit statistics. Thus, in-
transit merchandise arriving at the United States by vessel
and leaving by some other method of transportation is In-
cluded in the inbound data only. On the other hand, in-
transit merchandise arriving by other than waterborne trans-
portation and laden aboard vessels upon departure is included
in the outbound statistics but not in the inbound data. The
inbound and outbound segments, therefore, do not counter-
balance one another and are complementary only insofar as
they involve merchandise carried by vessels to and from the
United States. For a more detailed discussion of the in-
transit trade statistics and the types of shipments excluded
from these data see the February 1953 issue of the Foreign
Trade Statistics Notes.

All types of outbound vessel shipments in tables 1 and 5 are
credited to the coastal districts, customs districts, and
ports at which the merchandise was laden. All types of in-
bound vessel shipments in table 2 are credited to the coastal
districts, customs districts, and ports at which merchandise


was unladen. In the case of vessel general imports this is
not necessarily the same as the customs district in which
the goods were entered into warehouse or entered for Immedi-
ate consumption.

Vessel exports in tables 3 and 6 are credited to the foreign
trade areas at which the merchandise was unladen. Vessel
imports in table 4 are credited to the foreign trade areas
at which the merchandise was laden aboard the vessels carrying
the cargo to the United States. The countries of destination
or origin of merchandise are not necessarily located within
the trade areas to which the merchandise is shipped or from
which it is received. Detailed definitions of foreign trade
areas in terms of the countries and ports included in each
are contained in Schedule R, Code Classification and Defini-
tion of Foreign Trade Areas.

Shipping weight figures represent the gross weight of ship-
ments, including the weight of containers, wrappings, crates
and moisture content. Vessel export values represent the
values at time and place of export. They are based on the
selling price (or on the cost if not sold)and include inland
freight, insurance and other charges to place of export.
Transportation and other costs beyond the United States port
of exportation are excluded. Vessel import values, as well
as the values for in-transit shipments, are generally based
on the market or selling price and are in general f.o.b. the
exporting country. Since in-transit merchandise is not sub-
ject to the imposition of import duties at the United States,
the valuation reported for such shipments is not verified by
customs to the extent applicable in the case of import entries
and may in some cases include transportation costs and in-
surance to the United States as well as other cost elements.

Vessel shipments in tables 1 and 2 are classified as dry
cargo or tanker shipments solely on the basis of the type of
vessel used without regard to the cargo carried. Tanker
vessels are those primarily designed for the carriage of
liquid cargoes in bulk, while all others are classified as
dry cargo vessels. A further segregation of dry cargo vessel
shipments is provided in tables 3-6 on the basis of type of
service, i.e., liner (berth) or irregular (tramp). Liner
service is that type of service offered by a regular line
operator of dry cargo vessels on berth. The itineraries and
sailing schedules of such vessels are predetermined and
fixed. Irregular or tramp service is that type of service
afforded by dry cargo vessels which are chartered or other-
wise hired for the carriage of goods on special voyages.
Vessels in this type of service are not on berth and their
sailing schedules are not predetermined or fixed.


NA






ANNOUNCEMENTS AND SPECIAL NOTICES


SHIPMENTS OF GRAINS ON TANKER VESSELS

In compiling the United States waterborne foreign trade statistics, merchandise imported
or exported on dry cargo (liner and irregular service) vessels and tanker vessels is
shown separately. This distinction between dry cargo and tanker shipments is based
solely on the type of vessel used without regard to the cargo carried.

Although tanker vessels are those primarily designed for the carriage of liquid cargo
in bulk, an examination of the United States waterborne foreign trade statistics
revealed that a number of tanker vessels are departing from the United States with
shipments of grain, which is usually carried on dry cargo vessels. Information on the
amount of grain exported on tanker vessels during 1962 by port of lading is shown in the
following table:

DOLLAR VALUE AND SHIPPING WEIGHT OF GRAINS EXPORTED
ON TANKER VESSELS BY UNITED STATES PORT OF LADING

JANUARY-DECEMBER 1962


U.S. Port of Lading Value Shipping weight
U.S. Port of Lading (dollars) (pounds)


Total........................................ 320,615,549 11,837,588,234

Philadelphia, Pa ................................ 1,405 5,228
Baltimore, Md.................................... 2,891,075 96,983,800
Norfolk, Va..................................... 830,825 37,296,000

Mobile, Ala..................................... 7,647,753 253,194,720
Pascagoula, Miss................................ 16,119,611 602,560,170
New Orleans, La................................. 58,747,195 2,097,399,803
Baton Rouge, La................................. 52,279,290 1,689,348,538
Other ports in New Orleans Customs District..... 65,818,201 2,519,230,574
Port Arthur, Tex................................ 18,926,519 793,958,864
Lake Charles, La....................... ............ 1,584 23,955
Galveston, Tex.................................. 22,264,326 814,268,110
Houston, Tex.................................... 24,896,694 900,274,980
Corpus Christi, Tex............................. 13,310,320 620,190,592

Stockton, Calif................................. 864,553 33,263,000
Martinez, Calif ................................. 2,838 17,529

Portland, Oreg .................... 7,897,878 291,000,800
Longview, Wash.................................. 6,655,177 251,168,800
Vancouver, Wash................................. 7,614,193 279,873,170
Seattle, Wash................................... 1,027,283 38,074,067
Tacoma, Wash................ ................... 2,252,768 83,133,230

Duluth, Minn................................... 1,947,584 79,984,104
Superior, Wis................................... 8,509,027 352,429,240
Chicago, Ill................................ 109,450 3,908,960


be made avail-
Washington,


Monthly totals and port of lading by country of destination detail will
able upon request to the Foreign Trade Division, Bureau of the Census,
D.C. 20233.












Table 1.-SIPPING WEIGHT AND VALUE OF UNITED STATES WATEMBORN EXPORTS OF DOMESTIC AND FOREIGN MERCHANDISE, (UTBOND IN-TRANSIT MERCHANDISE, AND
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE CONTROLLED CARGO, ON DRY CARGO AND TANKER VESSELS, BY CUSTOMS DISTB

(Totals are given for al customs districts at which there are vessel shipments. Only those ports are shown whose combined export and import
Custom district totals are for all ports in the district Including those not show. Totals represent the sums of unounded figure

Shipping weight in millions of pounds

SFully compiled shipment _
u ,l compiled shipments'


Customs district end port


Total all districts:
January-December 1961 ......
January-December 1962..........

North Atlantic Coast Districts.


..-.............I......
.....................
............ 11... ....
H, H. ........
....................
.....................
.....................
.......... :. ::......
......... .....
.....................
................. .

.....................
.....................
.............. I......
I ...................
.....................



.......I..............
....................


Grand
total2


258,574.6
272,092.8

91,114.7

261.2
110.1

'21.2
0.7
22.4
103.4
1,250.5
1,219.5
'30. 0
0.9

0.1
276.7
276.1
415.0
127.2
287.8


Grand
total


257,547.9
270,939.0

90,639.3

260.3
110.0

20.7
0.7
22.4
103.4
1,242,5
1,214.2
27.3
0.9

0.1
276.7
276.1
415,0
127.2
287.8


Dry cargo i


Total


225,864.1
241,955.7

89,096.9

260.3
110.0

20.7
0.7
22.4
103.4
1,242.5
1,214.2
27.3
0.9


Domestic, foreign and
in-transit cargo



Domes- In-
Total tic and trans-
foreign it

(4) (5) (6)


224,956.8
240,802.3

88,794.0

260.3
110.0

20.7
0.7
22.4
103.4
1,241.5
1,213.2


223,646.4
239,429.3

88,188.9

221.5
71.5

20.7
0.7
22.4
103.1
1,240.6
1,212.4
27.2
0.9


1,310.4
1,373.0

605.1

38.8
38.5




0.3
0.9
0.8
0.1


Dept.
of
De-
fense
and
"Spe-
ocal
cate-


(7)


907.3
1,153.4

302.9








1.0
1.0
(*)


Total


(8)


31,683.8
28,983.3

1,542.4


Total


31,407.5
28,631.4

1,539.7


Tanker


Domes-
tic and
foreign

(10)


31,400.7
28,571.6

1,533.0


(11)


6.8
59.8

6.7


DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE CONTROLLED CARGO AND "SPECIAL CATEGORY" NON.
OF LADING:


nth durirt
Wr-Hd-i


year 1961.


2.


_F




Shipping weight in millions of pounds Value in millions or dollars

Fully compiled shipments' Fully compiled shipments n

Dry cargo Tanker Dry cargo Tanker
Doe einnd Dept. Dept.
Domestic, foreign and Dor Domegti, foreign and
Grand tn-transit cargo De- in-transit cargo Grand Do- Do-
Custona district and port total2 Crand ferse -erae total2'3 Grand lea- Inr- mes- In-
total Total Total total Total tic trars- Total tic trans-
"Spe- pe and it and it
Domes- In- ipe- Domes- In- pel for- for-
Total tic and trans- ats- oal forei g nd trns- cae- eign eign
foreign t goryc foreign it

fl) 12) 31 .) t5) 6) (7) (8) (9) (101 (11) (12) (13) (141 (15) (16' (17) (18) (191 '20)

South Atlantic Coast
DIatricts.-Cont Inued

Florida'............................. 1,087.9 1,014.8 996.5 993.8 988.7 5.1 2.7 18.3 18.3 18.3 ... ... 129.2 115.6 114.8 113.3 1.5 0.8 0.8 ...
Jacksonville...................... 574.7 563.3 550.2 5.9.9 548.5 1.4 0.3 13.1 13.1 13.1 ... ... 37,8 36.0 35. 3.9 0.5 0.6 0.6 ...
Miard ............................. 243.7 195.5 195.5 193.2 191.0 2.2 2.3 .. ... ... ... 62.0 51.7 51.7 50.8 0.9... ...
Sweat Palm Beach................... 32.7 27.2 27.2 27.2 26.9 0.3 () ... ... .. .. ... 4.7 4.2 4.2 '.1 0.1...
Port Everglades................... 182.7 174.8 169.5 169.5 168.3 1.2 ( 5.3 5.3 53 ... ... 21.0 19.9 19.7 19.6 0. 0.2 0.2 ...

Gulf Coast Districts........... 88,682.7 E8,429.0 70,152.3 69,934.2 60,286.2 6d8.0 218.1 18,276.7 17,929.5 17,923.0 6,5 347.2 3,939.8 3,910.4 3,306.8 3,194.1 112.7 603.6 603.0 0.6

Florida'.............................. 9,926.2 9,907.3 9,867.1 9,867.1 9,866.5 0.6 (.) 40.2 40.2 40.2 ... ... 119.0 117.< 116.0 115.9 0.1 1.4 1.4
Tampa............................. 8,658.7 8,639.0 8,637,3 8,637.3 8,636." 0.6 () 2.6 2.6 2.6 ... ... 86.1 8.6 84.5 84.4 0.1 0.1 0.1 ..
Key West.......................... k-) ... ... .. ... ... ... ... ... ... f
Pensacola......................... 100.1 100.1 80.5 80.5 80.5 ... ... 19.6 19.6 19.6 ... ... 5 7.5 7.0 70 ... 0.5 0.5 ..
Boca Orande....................... 772.7 772." 772.7 772.7 772.7 ... ... ... ... ... ... 2.9 2.9 2.9 2.9 ... .. .
Panama City....................... 374.9 374.Q 356.8 356.8 356.8 ... ... 18.1 18.1 18.1 ... ... 21.2 21.2 20.4 20.4 ... 0.8 0.8
Port St. Joe...................... 19.8 19 8 19 8 19.8 19.8 ... ... ... ... ... ... ... 1.1 1.1 1.1 1.1..
Mobile............................... 5,813.9 5,8063 ',9573 4,892.4 4,871.0 21.4 64.' 849.0 849.0 849.0 ... ... 220. 219.6 195.' 192.1 3.6 23.9 23.9 ..
Mobile, Ala...................... 3,182.1 3,174.6 2,919.1 2,880.0 2,879.3 0.7 39.1 255.5 255.5 2555 ... ... 142.3 141.6 133. 133.8 0.1 7.7 7.7 ..
dalfport, Miss .................... lo.. .2 263.1 262.4 262.3 241.5 20.8 0.1 0.7 0.7 ." ... ... 14.0 14.0 14.0 10.. 3.6 () () ..
Pascagoula, Miss................... 2,368.7 2,368. 1,775.8 1,750.1 1,750,1 ... 25.7 592. 592.9 592.9 ... ... 64.1 64.1 48.0 48.0 ... 16.1 16.1 ..
New Orleans .......................... 36,773.7 36,600.3 27,528.4 27,.16.9 27,278.4 138.5 111.5 9,071.9 9,071.9 9,71. .,, (.) 1,711. 1,692.3 1,391.4 1,374.7 16." 300, 300.9
New Orleans, La................... 17,661.5 1",.90.0 14,740.0 1.,628,5 14,528.3 100.2 111.5 2,750.0 2,-50.0 2,750.0 ,,. (*) 1,160.4 1,1-1.7 1,021.4 1,005.0 16.4 10,.3 120.3
Baton Ro.ge, La................... 8,555.5 8,553.? 5,381.5 5,381,5 5,343.2 38.3 (") 3,172.2 3,1"2.2 3,172.2 ... ... 264.7 26 ..' ".'1 176., 0.3 87 '.4 ...
Port Sulphur, La.................. 1,130.4 1,130.4 1,130.4 1,130.4 1,130,4 ... ... ... ... 11.4 11.4 11.4 11. ... ... ...
Tennessee............................ 0,4 0.4 0.4 0.'. 0,4 ... ... ... ... ... ... (a) (*j f.) (..
St. Louis............................
SabIne............................... 10,8571 10,845.0 7,990.2 7,9". ",97..2 0.2 15.8 2,854,8 2,831.4 2,831. () 23.4 363,8 363.0 282.3 282.2 0.1 80," 80.7 a)
Port Arthur, Tex.................. 5,6.,.2 5,632.9 3,955.5 3,955.4 3,955.4 ,,. 0.1 1,677.4 1,669.2 1,669.2 ... 8.2 142.5 141.8 95.1 95.1 ... 4f." -6.7
Orange, rex....................... 160.5 160.5 157.5 157.5 157,5 ... ... 3.0 3.0 3.0 ... ... 10.3 10.3 10.1 10.1 ... 0.2 0.2
Beaumont, lTe....................... 3,C0'6.7 3,066.5 2,309.7 2,294.1 2,293.9 0.2 15.6 756.8 741.6 741.6 .,, 15.2 100.9 100.9 80.5 80. 0.1 20.4 20.4
Lake Charles, La.................. 1,985.6 1,985.0 1,567.5 1,567,3 1,56".J (*) 0.2 417.5 417.5 417.5 (a) ... 110.2 1(0.1 96.6 96.6 (") 13.5 13.5 (a)
Galveston............................ 24,714.3 24,o72.8 19,222. 19,199.6 19,159.1 40.5 22.8 5,450.4 5,126.5 5,120.6 5.9 323.9 1,418.1 1,411.0 1,214.6 1,208.2 6.4 196.- 195.8 0.6
Galveston, ex .................... 7,273.8 ",272.1 6,311.8 6,308.8 6,301.8 7.0 3.0 960.3 942.2 942.2 ... 18.1 379.7 379.6 346.6 345.2 1.4 33.0 33.0
Houston, Tex...................... 13,268,8 13,229.4 10,326.6 10,310.8 10,28.0 32.8 15.8 2,902.8 2,698.6 2,692.7 5.9 2C0..2 864.5 85." 764.6 750.8 4.8 93.1 92.5 0.6
Freeport, Tex..................... 221.2 221.2 64.6 64,6 64.4 ... ... 156.6 156.6 156.6 ... ... 19,4 19.4 4.8 A.8 ... 1,6 14. ...
Corpus Christi, lex............... 3,627.0 3,626.7 2,516.6 2,512.6 2,5118 0.8 .0 1,110.1 1,034.8 1,034.8 ... 753 1272 12".0 98.6 98.4 0.2 28.4 28.4 ...
Texas City, Tex................... 323.2 323.2 2.8 ?,8 2.8 ,.. ... 320.4 294.2 294.2 ... 26.2 27.' 2".' 0.1 0.1 ... 2".3 21.3 ...
Laredo............................... 597,1 596.9 586.6 583.6 136.7 46.9 3.0 10.3 10.3 9.8 0.5 ... 107.0 lob.9 106.7 20,9 85.8 0.2 0.2 (*)
Brownsville, Tex.................. 5,7.1 596.9 586.6 583.6 136.7 446.9 3.0 10.3 10.3 9.8 0.5 ... 107.0 106.9 10O." 20.' 85.8 0.2 0,2 (")


South Pacific Coast Districts.. 20,911.4 20,738.8 14,192.3 13,812.7 13,"62.8 49,9 379.6 6,546.5 6,546.5 6,500.3 46.2 ... 1,113.8 1,085.6 1,019.5 1,002.2 17.3 66.1 65.6 0.5

San Diego............................ 10,.5 170.1 170.0 168.0 162.4 5.6 2.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 ... ,,, 26.2 26.2 26.2 24.8 1.' () () ...
Los Angeles.......................... 10,687.3 10,644.8 5,591.7 5,540.6 5,508.3 32.3 51.1 5,053.1 5,053.1 5,050.0 3.1 ... 412.8 406.9 360.6 352.0 8.6 46.3 46.2 0.1
Los Angeles, Calif................ 5,34.3.6 5,311.3 1,868.9 1,859.6 1,842.5 17.1 9.3 3,442.4 3,.2,.4 3,441.9 0.5 ... 231.7 227.t 19'..3 189.6 i.." 33.3 33.2 0.1
Port Sanr Luis, Calif............... 352.6 352.6 ) (a) (*) ... ... 352.6 352.6 352.6 ... ... 2.4 2.4 () ) ... 2.4 2.4 ...
Long Beach, Calif................. 4,557.7 4,548.1 3,651.6 3,610.1 3,594.9 15.2 41.5 896.5 896.5 893.9 2.6 ... 174.4 172.6 163,6 159.6 4.0 9.0 8.9 0.1
El Segundo, Calif................. 361.7 361.7 (' f) (*) ... .,, 361,7 361.7 361." .,, ,,, 1." 1.7 (' i) .. 1.7 1.7 ...
Hueneme, Calif.................... 71.9 71.3 71.3 71.0 71.0 03 ... ... .. ... ... 2.7 2,7 2.7 2.7...
San Franc isco........................ 10,053.6 9,923.9 8,-30.6 8,104.1 8,092.1 12.0 326.5 1,.93.3 1,a.93.3 1,450.2 43.1 ... 674.6 652.' 632.6 625. 7.2 19.8 19.4 0.4
Eureka, Calif..................... 294.9 294.1 294.1 287.9 287, t ) 6.2 ... ... ... ... ... 94 .4 9. 9. ... ... ..
Ean Francisco, Calif .............. 1,218.5 1,157.5 1,155.5 1,139.2 1,128.5 10.7 18.3 .. ... ... .. ... 331.7 318.8 318,8 312.1 6. ... ... ...
Stockton, Calil................... 3,370,2 3,35".5 3,327.0 3,310,4 3,310.3 0.1 16.6 30.5 30,5 30.5 ... ... 111.3 109.8 109,0 109.0 fa) 0.8 0.8 ...
Oakland, Clif .................... 1,351.0 1,318.8 1,318.8 1,089,8 1,089.6 0.2 229.0 ... ,, ... ... ... 133.0 128.4 128.4 128.3 0.1
Richmond, Calir................... 1,385.4 1,382.0 595.9 578,9 578,9 (a) 17,0 786.1 786.1 747.2 38.9 ,. 38.9 38.7 27.1 27.1 (,) 11.6 11.3 0.3
Alameda, Calif.................... 293.4 273,B 25".8 253.9 253.0 0.9 3.9 16.0 16.0 16.0 ... ... 39.3 36.3 35,4 35.0 0.4 0.9 0.9 ...
Martinez, Calif................... 159.9 159.9 1.4 1.4 1.4 ... ... 158.5 158.5 158.5 ... ... 1.8 1.8 .) (a) ... 1.8 1.8.
Redwood City, Calif............... 1,016.7 1,016.7 1,016.7 1,016.7 1,016.7 ... ... ... ... ... ... ... 2.2 2.2 2.2 2.2...
Selby, Calif...................... 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6 ... ... ... ... ... ... ) () () ( )... ...
See footnotes at end of table.












Table 1.-SHIPPING WIGHT AND VAt.W OF WITED STATES VATERBORMB EXPORTS OF DOMESTIC AND FORBIGN HERCHANDISB, 00TBOWD IN-TRANSIT MERCHANDISB, AND SHIPMENTS OF WPARSWNT OF WFZNSB CONTROLLED CARGO AND "SPECIAL CATECORY* 50#-
T NEHTRAPBD OF DEFENSE CONTRG1.LED CASGO BY CUST&JS DISTRICT AND PORT OF LADING-Continued


Shipping weight in millions of pounds Value in millions of dollars

Fully compiled shipments1 Fully compiled shipments1

Dry oargo _anker Dry cargo Tanker

Domestic, foreign and ot Domestil, foreign oand D .
Grand in-transit argo in-transit cargo De- Grand Do- Do-
Custome district and port total Grand fense fense total3 Grand mes- In- mes- In-
total Total and Total and total3 Total tic trans- Total tic tranm-
Dome- In- "Spe- Dome- In- "Spe- and it and it
Total tic and trans- Total tic d trans- n en
foreign It cate- foreign It i e
gory" 3 i gory
(() (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) (9) (10) (11) (12) (13) (14) (15) (16) (17) (18) (19) (20)


North Pacific Coast Districts..

Ore gon...............................
Astoria.................... ......
Newport.........................
Coos Bay.........................
Portland .........................
Longview, Wash...................
Vancouver, Wash...................

Washington..........................
Se ttle.... ......................
Tacoma............................
Aberdeen-Hoquinm.................
Bellingham............... .......
Everett..........................
Port Angeles.....................
Port Townsend ..................
Anacortes.........................

Great Lakes Districtas..........


....................
Y.................



..................
....................


o...................

.l-a, i.............nn...
Y.I.. ... ... ..........
1. Y..................


.or ..................


Fall.-Ranier, Minn..
... .... ..............


15,762.9

10,362.0
175.9
46.3
810.4
5,364.2
2,698.7
1,238, 6

5,400.9
1,708.7
1,989.1
281.8
247.3
405.2
265.9
11.1
56.4

50,454.4

14.2
14.2



3,145.6
506.7
403.4
2,235.6

235.6
235. 6

14,781.7
2,964.3
672.4

6,643.6


15,692.2 14,518.2

10,346.5 9,510.1
175.9 175.9
46.3 46.3
807.3 807.3
5,352.1 5,045.0
2,698.6 2,449.1
1,238.5 958.6

5,345.6 5,008.0
1,704.9 1,636.4
1,987.9 1,732.2
281.0 281.0
247.3 247.3
405.2 405.2
259.1 259.1
11.1 11.1
56.4 44.9

50,388.7 49,532.7

14.2 14.2
14.2 14.2



3,144.2 3,144.2
506.7 506.7
403.3 403.3
2,234.2 2,234.2

235.4 227.8
235,4 227,8

14,776.3 14,405.4
2,964.3 2,884.3
672.4 672.4

6,638.2 6,347.3

1,176.4 1,096.1
973.9 923.5
(*) (*)
106.6 106.6

9S.8 69.9


14,347.1

9,478.9
175.8
34.7
799,3
5,038.2
2,444.4
958.6

4,868.1
1,586.6
1,725.6
240.4
247.3
389.8
242.3
11.1
37.3

49,512.6

14.2
14.2



3,144.2
506.7
403.3
2,234.2

227.8
227.8

14,405.4
2,884.3
672.4

6,347.3

1,095.5
922.9
(*)
106. 6


14,338.6

9,478.7
175.8
34.7
799.3
5,038,0
2,444.4
958.6

4,859.8
1,579.3
1,725.5
240.4
246.9
389.8
242.0
11.1
37.3

49,475.6

14.2
14.2



3,143.8
506.7
402.9
2,234.2

193,1
193.1

14,405.4
2,884.3
672.4


171,1

31.2
0.1
11.6
8,0
6.8
4.7
(*)
139.9
49.8
6.6
40.6

15.4
16.8

7'.6

20.1












(a)
(a)


1,174.0

836.4




249.5
279.9

337.6
68.5
255.7







856.0


1,174.0

836.4



307.1
249.5
279.9

337.6
68.5
255.7





11.5

854.0


1,173.5

836.4



307.1
249.5
279.9

337.1
68.0
255.7





11.5

854.0


0.5

...
...
...
,,,
...
.,,
...

0.5
0.5
,,,
...
...
,,,
n,
...
...

...

...
...



,..
...
...
...

...
...

...
...
...


590.2 586.8

346.4 344.8
1.7 1.7
1.1 1.1
18,3 18,2
204.2 202,7
83.1 83.1
37.6 37.6

243.8 242.0
112.3 111.7
77.5 77.3
13.0 13.0
11.0 11.0
17.3 17?.3
8.3 7,2
0.6 0,6
1.7 1.7

899.4 897.4

1.7 1.7
1.7 1.7



18.4 18.3
3.4 3.4
6.6 6.6
8.4 8.3

8.2 8.2
8.2 8.2

197.8 197.8
68.5 68,5
2.7 2.7

99.7 99.7


557.2

322.2
1.7
1.1
18.2
194.3
76.5
30.0

235.0
109.6
72.7
13.0
11.0
17.3
7.2
0.6
1,4

868.4

1.7
1.7



18.3
3.4
6.6
8.3

8.0
8.0

187.3
66.6
2.7


555.7

322.1
1.7
1.1
18.2
194.2
76.5
30.0

233.6
108.3
72.7
13.0
11.0
17.3
7.2
0.6
1.4

867.1

1.7
1.7


18.3
3.4
6.6
8.3


1.5

0.1



0.1



1.4
1.3
(a)

(*)




1.1


29.6

22.6


29.6

22.6



8.4
6.6
7.6


(a)














Table 1..--MPPING WIOHT AND VALUE OF UNITED STATES tATERBORNE EXPORTS OF DOMESTIC AND FOREIGN MERCHANDISE, OUTBOUND IN-TRANSIT MERCHANDISE, AND SHIPHEMrS OF DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE CONTROLLED CARGO AND "SPECIAL CATEGORY" NON-
TaPA RIMHIT OF DE NSE CONTROLLED CARGO, ON: DRY CAROD AND TANIR VESSELS, BY CUSTCMS DISTRICT AND FORT OF LADING-Continued


Shipping weight in millions of pounds Value in millions of dollars

Fully compiled shipments' Fully compiled shipments

Dry cargo Tanker Dry cargo Tanker

Domestic, foreign and Depo. Domestic, foreign and Dept.
Grand in-transit cargo n-transit cargo De- Grand Do- Do-
Customs district and port totaal2 Grand tense tense total"' Grand mea- mes-
total Total and Total and total' Total tic In- Total tie rn-
Domes- In- "Spe- Dome- I"Sp- Spe- and it and
ial tic and trans ali for- for-
Total tic and tran- Total r tra- gn e
foreign It go" foreign It g
gory" gory"

(1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) (.) (10) (11) (12) (13) (1l) f15) (16) 117) o18) (19) (20)

Great Lakes Districts-Con.

Chicago.............................. 4,520.8 4,513.1 4,391.9 4,389.4 4,389.1 0.3 2.5 121.2 121.2 121.2 ... ... 230.1 229.' 220.9 220.8 0.1 8.5 8.5
Chicago, 111 ...................... 4,438.4 4.,430.7 4,315.9 4,313.4 4,313.1 0.3 2.5 114.8 114.8 114.8 ... ... 228.3 227.6 219.5 219.4 0.1 8.1 8.1 ...
East Chiceego, Ind ................. 82.3 82.3 75.9 75.9 75.9 ... ... 6.A. 6.4 6.& ... ... 1.8 1.8 1.4 1.4 ... 0.4 0.4
Ohio ................................. 22,155.4 22,138.6 22,015.7 22,004..4 22,004.4 (a) 11.3 122.9 120.9 120.9 ... 2.0 246.a 246.4 244.0 243.9 0.1 2.4 2.4 ...
Cleveland......................... 277.3 276.2 256.5 256.1 256.1 (a) 0.4 19.7 19.7 19.7 ... ... 38.8 38.5 37.3 37.2 0.1 1.2 1.2 ...
Toledo............................ 15,539.6 15,524.1 15,'.2.. 15,15,13.2 15,413.2 (-) 10.9 100.0 98.0 98.0 ... 2.0 177.8 177.7 176.6 176.6 (-) 1.1 1.1 ...
Erle, Pa.......................... 801.1 801.0 797.7 797.7 797.7 ... ... 3.3 3.3 3.3 ... ... 4.5 4.5 4.4 4.A ... 0.1 0.1 ...
Sandusaq .......................... 1,242.2 1,242.2 1,242.2 1,2'2.2 1,242.2 ... ... ... ... ... ... .. 5.4 5.4 5.4 5.4 ... ... ......
Ashtabula......................... 2,759.4 2,759.4 2,759.4 2,759.4 2,759.4 ... ... ... ... ... ... ... 13.6 13.6 13.6 13.6 ... ... ...
Conneaut .......................... 459.9 459.9 459.9 459.9 459.9 ... ... ... ... ... ... ... 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.5 ... ...
Fairport.......................... 463.5 463.5 .63.5 463.5 463.5 ... ... ... ... ... ... ... 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.7 ... ...
Huron............................. 6'1.7 41.7 41.7 41.7 41." ... ... ... ... ... ... ... 1.3 1.3 1.3 1.3 ... ...
Loreln............................ 512.2 512.2 512.2 512.2 512.2 ... ... ... ... ... ... ... 2.1 2.1 2.1 2.1 ... ...


Puerto Rico, Hawaii, and
Alaska Districts.............. 1,395.3 1,373.4 865.3 864.8 861.4 3.4 0.5 508.1 508.1 508.1 ... ... 65.q 63.8 56.9 56.6 0.3 6.9 6.9

Puerto Rico........................... ..... 660.0 652.1 2&2.0 242.0 238.6 3.4 C() 410.1 410.1 410.1 ... ... 18.1 17.3 12.9 12.6 0.3 4.4 4.4 ...
Guanice........................... 212.1 212.1 135.0 135.0 135.0 ... ... 77.1 7".1 77.1 ... ... 3.0 3.0 2.2 2.2 ... 0.8 0.8 ...
Mayaguez.......................... 15.1 15.1 3.5 3.5 3.1 0.' ... 11.6 11.6 11.6 ... ... 0.'. 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1
Ponce.............................. 51.5 51.0 27.2 27.2 27.2 ... 23.8 23.8 23.8 ... ... 2.3 2.3 2.0 2.0 ... 0.3 0.3 ...
San Juan .......................... 23".4 230.1 76.7 76.2 73.3 2.9 (-1 153.9 153.9 153.Q ... ... 10.7 10.0 8.' 8.3 0.1 1.6 1.6
Hewall............................... 358.8 345.5 2,.7.4 246.9 .46.8 0.1 0.5 98.1 98.1 98.1 ... ... 26.0 24.7 22.2 22.2 (") 2.5 2.5
Honolulu .......................... 306.1 295.1 197.0 196.5 196.4 0.1 0.5 98.1 98.1 98.1 ... ... 20.9 19.9 17.4 17.4 (C) 2.5 2.5
Alaska............................... 376.8 376.1 376.1 376.1 376.1 ... ... ... ... ... ... ... 21.9 21.9 21.9 21.9
Wrangell.......................... 101.b 100.9 100.9 100.9 100.9 ... ... ... ... ... ... ... 1.9 1.9 1.9 1.9 ...
Sltka............................. 231.7 231.- 231.7 231.7 231.7 ... ... ... ... ... ... ... 17.2 17.2 17.2 17.2 ... ... ...

*Denotes less than 50,000 pounds; less than 50,000 dollars. 'Figures based on complete coverage of shipments valued at $500 or more. 'Figures based on complete coverage of shipments valued at $500 or more and an eestl-
mate based on a 10 percent sample of the $100-$499 shipments. The chances are 2 out of 3 in the long run that the sampling error for the shipping weight figures uhlch include estimates for the low-value shipments is less than
one percent or less than 50,000 pounds unless otherwise noted. The sampling error for the value figures which include estimates for the low-value shipments is less then one percent or less than 850,000 unless otherviae noted.
3The grand totals for value columne 13 and 141 are not strictly relative to the grand toLals for shipping weight (columns 1 and 21 due to The exclusion of value date for exports of Departrrent or Defense controlled cargo and
"Special category" comm'aities. 4Florida Atlantic Coast port totals should be added to Florida Gulf Coast port totals to obtain total exports through the Customs District of Florida. 5T1,e sampling error is between I and 3
percent.


I






Table 2,-SHIPPING WEIGHT AND VALUE OF UNITED STATES WATERBORNE GENERAL IMPORTS AND INBOUND IN-TRANSIT MERCHANDISE, ON DRY CARGO AND TANKER VESSELS,
BY CUSTOMS DISTRICT AND PORT OF UNLOADING:

(Totals are given for all customs districts at which there are vessel shipments. Only those ports are shown whose combined export and import tonnage averaged 5 million pounds or more per nonth during calendar year 1961. Customs
district totals are for all ports in the district including those not shown. Totals represent the sums of unfounded figures, hence may vary slightly from the sums of the rounded amount)

Shipping weight in millions of pounds Value in millions of dollars

Dry cargo Tanker Dry cargo Tanker

CGrand Grand
Customs district d port General In- Total General In- total Total General In- Total General In-
S imports transit Tt imports transit imports transit imports transit


(1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) (9) (10) (11) (12) (13) (14)

Total all districts:
January-Decemter 1961.................. 399,802.0 169,585.5 168,379.5 1,206.0 230,216.5 207,511.9 22,704.6 11,065.3 9,305.7 9,116.1 189.6 1,759.6 1,527.8 231.8
January-December 1962.................... 445,044.5 198,064.5 196,893.5 1,171.0 246,980.0 224,344.1 22,635.9 12,210.0 10,359.8 10,160.9 178.9 1,850.2 1,622.4 227.8

North Atlantic Coast Districts........... 269,778.3 93,300.1 92,472.9 827.2 176,478.2 153,898.2 22,580.0 7,756.9 6,428.6 6,308.6 120.0 1,328,3 1,102.2 226.1

Maine and New Hampshire....................... 27,996.2 772.6 756.5 16.1 27,223.6 4,756.2 22,467.4 267.9 12.2 12.1 0.1 255.7 31.0 224.7
Portlanq, Me ............................... 24,112.4 212.1 196.0 16.1 23,900.3 1,432.9 22,467.4 242.0 8.3 8.2 0.1 233.7 9.0 224.7
Bangor, Me .................................. 289.2 27.8 27.8 ... 261.4 261.4 ... 1.6 0.1 0.1 ... 1.5 1.5
Eastport, Me ................................ 48.1 48.1 48.1 ) ... ... 1.3 1.3 1.3 ()... ...
Portsmouth, N. H............................ 1,305.9 326.1 326.1 ... 979.8 979.8 ... 6.9 0.4 0.4 ... 6.5 6.5
Belfast, Me................................. 662.1 40.9 40.9 ... 621.2 621.2 ... 4.3 0.5 0.5 ... 3.8 3.8 ...
Searsport, Me ............................... 1,314.1 85.9 85.9 ... 1,228.2 1,228.2 ... 9.5 0.7 0.7 ... 8.8 8.8 ..
Massachusetts................................. 14,188.3 3,324.3 3,315.2 9.1 10,864.0 10,864.0 ... 535.7 467.4 465.6 1.8 68.3 68.3 ...
Boston...................................... 12,602.4 3,089.5 3,080.5 9.0 9,512.9 9,512.9 ... 493.8 434.1 432.3 1.8 59.7 59.7
Gloucester.................................. 116.9 116.9 116.8 0.1 ... ... ... 22.9 22.9 22.9 .() ...
New Bedford................................. 114.8 45.5 45.5 (a) 69.3 69.3 ... 6.7 6.3 6.3 (") 0.4 0.4
Fall River .................................. 868.4 64.2 64.2 ... 804.2 804.2 ... 8.2 3.2 3.2 ... 5.0 5.0
Salem....................................... 477.8 0.2 0.2 ... 477.6 477.6 ... 3.3 (a) (a) ... 3.3 3.3
Rhode Island................................... 2,495.8 188.5 188.5 () 2,307.3 2,307.3 ... 19.6 6.0 6.0 (*) 13.6 13.6
Providence.................................. 2,044.0 168.3 168.3 (a) 1,875.7 1,875.7 ... 16.5 5.2 5.2 (a) 11.3 11.3
Connecticut ................................... 4,423.9 884.1 884.1 .. 3,539.8 3,539.8 ... 39.4 16.4 16.4 ... 23.0 23.0 ...
Bridgeport.................................. 1,075.2 436.7 436.7 ... 638.5 638.5 ... 6.7 3.0 3.0 ... 3.7 3.7 ..
New Haven................................... 2,412.0 353.6 353.6 ... 2,058.4 2,058.4 ... 21.1 7.4 7.4 ... 13.7 13,7 ...
New london.................................. 936.7 93.8 93.8 ... 842.9 842.9 ... 11.5 6.0 6.0 ... 5.5 5.5 ...
New York ..................................... 79,205.8 21,390.9 20,681.8 709.1 57,814.9 57,726.3 88.6 4,827.9 4,408.0 4,294.6 113.4 419.9 418.6 1.3
New Yor................................... ...... 77,089.2 20,776.8 20,067.7 709.1 56,312.4 56,223.8 88.6 4,808.4 4,399.1 4,285.7 113.4 409.3 408.0 1.3
Albany..................................... 1,052.7 175.0 175.0 ... 877.7 877.7 ... 14.4 8.2 8.2 ... 6.2 6.2
Philadelphia.................................. 92,661.4 33,096.3 33,046.1 50.2 59,565.1 59,541.1 24.0 1,120.1 674.3 671.2 3.1 445.8 445.6 0.2
Philadelphia, Pa............................ 41,805.4 20,383.1 20,332.9 50.2 21,422.3 21,422.3 ... 742.2 581.1 578.1 3.0 161.1 161.1 ...
Wilmington, Del............................. 10,671.6 1,229.4 1,229.4 ... 9,442.2 9,442.2 ... 92.2 29.2 29.2 ... 63.0 63.0
Pauleboro, N. J ............................. 17,157.8 .46.6 46.6 (a) 17,111.2 17,101.8 9.4 128.3 2.4 2.4 (a) 125.9 125.8 0.1
Camden, N. J................................ 1,851.6 610.7 610.7 (a) 1,240.9 1,240.9 (*) 22.8 14.3 14.3 (a) 8.5 8.5 (*)
Gloucester City, N. J....................... 39.8 6.4 6.4 ... 33.4 33.4 ... 0.5 0.3 0.3 ... 0.2 0.2 ...
Marcus Hook, Pa............................. 10,289.5 0.1 0.1 ... 10,289.4 10,274.8 14.6 86.8 (a) (a) ... 86.8 86.7 0.1
Maryland....................................... 37,238.0 29,457.2 29,416.4 40.8 7,780.8 7,780.8 ... 658.9 605.9 604.5 1.4 53.0 53,0 ...
Baltimore ................................... 36,529.9 29,432.8 29,392.0 40.8 7,097.1 7,097.1 ... 651.6 603.1 601.7 1.4 48.5 48.5 ...
Virginia....................................... 11,568.9 4,186.3 4,184.4 1.9 7,382.6 7,382.6 ... 287.6 238.5 238.2 0.3 49.1 49.1 ...
Norfolk ..................................... 5,575.8 2,147.7 2,146.9 0.8 3,428.1 3,428.1 ... 182.5 158.7 158.5 0.2 23.8 23.8 ...
Newport News.............................. 5,590.7 1,724.8 1,723.7 1.1 3,865.9 3,865.9 ... 87.7 63.1 63.0 0.1 24.6 24.6 ...
Richmond.................................... 108.5 72.2 72.2 (a) 36.3 36.3 ... 3.8 3.5 3.5 ( 0.3 0.3 ...
Alexandria .................................. 207.9 207.9 207.9 () ... ... ... 13.2 13.2 13.2 (,,, ... ...

South Atlantic Coast Districts........... 19,617.7 8,235.5 8,233.9 1.6 11,382.2 11,382.2 ... 566.6 489.8 488.6 1.2 76.8 76.8

North Carolina................................... 1,384.6 644.0 644.0 () 740.6 740.6 ... 51.3 45.7 457 () 5.6 5.6...
wilmineton.---- -- ------- I --1 nq7 r1* Q Al Q f a A ,a I, ( I




















S.. 42 ... 3,. .. .. ... .S2 0.52 .. .









.. ... ..4.. 9.. ................ 3.0 .. .
0..... ... ..... ............ .. .. ... ,9B,. ,.. .. ... 02 2 03.2 .6 .2 .







893 w 6,, ,., .. ..,.,.,........ 5.2 2.7 2.26 2. 9 2.3 6.2 3,3 3 0 ,3 56. 0.5 0), ( 14
:T..................... ... 9.69.9 996 33. 1. 262.0 262.0 ... ..1 5,4



;,.. ... ...... ..............<..... 386.3 69.l 52.9 7 3,2. 3,523.2 .. 27.0 8.3 4,.1 4.2 18.7 .7
La Ch3 e, L........................... 402,8 29.0 289.0,5.2 ... 21138 113,0 49.3 3. 3.8 7 0.1 ,5
1684. 1,9. 1 2'..5. 35 ..3...........13...... 9,060. 2.1 .62 53 2,0. 2,9.03 0.2 454.1 427,14 424,7 2.7 226. 26.1
alveetoxn, Tex................................ 278.0 27.0 2 74.6 3.4 ..4 ... ... 27.9 27.9 27.5 04. 4
IHsto, Tei.. i .........,n................. 26,210.9 3,9927 3,95.4 i7.3 2,T 7.2 2,876.2 ... 357.0 333.8 332.2 1.6 23.2 23.2
Port Tan x ............................ .. 2 2.7 2. ... 2.5 2.3 0.2 0.8 0.3 0.3 ... 0.5 0.5 ...
pu cisti, x..................... ......... 49,69.9 9,40.9 9393.4 14.5 262.0 262.0 ,, 56,6 55.1 5. 7... 1. 1.5
peo City, Taox.............................. 22.8 12,0 12.0 ... 10.8 10.8 ... 11 ... ... 10.2 .. 1.5 1.5
La leo ........................................ 13,566.3 63.1 55.9 72.2 3,523.2 3,523.2 ... 27.0 8,3 4.1 4.2 18.7 187
Bo~vi, a ........ ................... 3,586.3 63.1 55.9 7.2 3,523.2 3,52. ... 27.0 6.3 4.1 4.2 18.7 18.7





.t Pit Coat Distrits............. 38,060.5 9,022.1 8,970.6 51.5 29,034 29,.0 31.4 1,416.5 1,192.2 1,170.8 214 2243 223.1 1.2
San Mis..... ........................... 2896.3 249.1 22,12 7.9 647.2 647.2 ... 3.33.1 3 24.2 4.1 4.8 4.
s aga~ ee.................................... 23,210, 5,176.4 ,12. 33.7 1,034.4 180066 27.8 810.2 66.9 655,4 12.5 1423 11 11
Lo Angeles .. Calif.. ....................... 13,01 ,7 2,523.1 21,496.5 270 10,558.2 10,530.4 27.8 491.0 4028.9 3932 9.7 88.1 7.0 11

Long BOeac, Calif.......................... 7,650.7 2,653.0 2,646.2 6.8 ,99 .1 ... 56 25.1 212 2.5 2.3 21 38 ...3
BEl S Ra o, Cali ............................ 25,478.5 ... ... 1.0 2,47.5 2,478.5 ... 172. ... ... ... 17.7 17.7




u *l Sulehu, ali .................... .... 0.5 8.4 ... ... ... ... 0. 0.6 0.6 .........
an Fancisco........ j....................... .13,93.5 3,596.7 3,56.8 9.9 10,356.8 10,353.2 3,6 573,1 495.9 491.1 4.8 77.2 77.2 (...)



S. us Ce.....ai.............................. 98. 8.0. ., .. ... ... 9., 1..48
San Francieco, Calif.....a .B B..,,....... 2,281.8 2,281. 2,272.3 9.5 ,2 ... ... 431.1 431.1 426.4 4.7 .0 10,
Si on ....a..i.............................. 9242, 202.1 202.1 () 40.7 401. ... 161. 14.7 15.7 (*) 0.4 0.4
Oakland, Calif........................... 306.1 269.7 269.6 0.1 3.4 3... ... 3.7 23.1 23.1 0.6 0
Rieang., Ca............................... 221 221.4 () 3,6978 3,694.2 3,6 359 8,8 () 27.1 27

a ne, Cali.......................... .... () () ,3.7 ,3.7 .. ... 34.2 34.2
a City, Calif..................,........ 180.4 80.4 6. 0, ... ...8 ... 6 0.6 0.6 ... ...... ...








Galvestwn ,...,.............,. ...,.,,.. 25,.20 393.,2 2529.3 ... ,1.3 0. 26.1 42.4 424. 1 .7.... .7
aeoly, Calif................................ 8.3 8.3 8. ... ... .... ... 14 1... 1...
ton ciic Cost ic...t........... ..... 8,199.8 65,992.7 3,939.5 53.2 1,207.1 1,27.1 ... 263.0 253.0 249.0 4.0 10.0 10.0

Or eepo.......................................... 1,96.1 1,586.0 1,235.2 0.2 81.6 81.6 ... 115.3 114.5 114.3 0... 0. 0.8
Astir a ................................ 22.8 22.8 21.8 ,.. ... ... ... 7 3. 0.2 ... .. ...




La ed ...................................... 50.3 363.1 3.6 ... 7.6 ...2 ... 27. 8.3 .. 4. .. .4 ...
Portland...le.............. .............. 1,458.5 1,380.4 1379.9 0. 7.1........ 7..1 ... 81.2 80 80.3 01 0.
Lontview, WasBi............................. 253.2 253.2 252.9 03 ... ,... ... 26.8 26.8 26.7 0.1
Van oDver, Wa.h.......................... 68.5 684.15 68.5 .. .. ... ... 3.6 3.6 3.6 ...
ashi nglton .................................. 36,232.2 3,106.7 5,054.3 524 1,125.5 1,125.5 ... 147.8 138.6 55134,7 3.9 9.2 9.2
Seattle ... Ca............................... 1,989.4 1,752.7 1,701.0 51,7 236.7 2367. ... 99.5 97.2 93.4 3.8 2.13 2,3
Tacoma.................................... 1,623.1 1,131.8 1,131.5 0.3 491.3 491.3 ,.. 26.9 24,9 24.9 (a) 4.0 4,0
Abordean-HCoquifm...............................21,1 21.1 21,1 '.. ... ... ... 2.1 2.1 2.1
BellindBa l..... ........................... 1,259.4 1,241.6 1,241.2 0.4 17.8 17.8 ... 14.8 4.6 4.6 (*... 0.12 0.2
Everetlt............................... 401.2 363,6 363.6 ... 37,6 37.6 ... 6.9 6.5 6.5 .. 0.4 0,4
Part Angeles................................ .176.6 176.8 176.8 ... ... ,., ... 1.2 1.2 1.27...
Port Townsendal ............................. 355.0 3550 3550 .. ., .. 1.1 11 1.1
Anacorte a. ...I........................... 54.81 54.1 54.1 7... ... ,. 0.7 0.7 0.7 ...
Great Lakes Distrift...................... 31,297.9 31,7.1 31,022.9 54.2 220.8 320.8 ... 562.4 555,6 553.7 1.9 6.6 6.8
St. Lawrence.................................. .231.1 213.6 213.6 ... 17.5 17.5 12. 10.4 10.3 10.3 ... 0.1 0.1
Odenaburt N, Y........................... 210.5 193,0 193.0 5, 17.5 17,5 ... 10.3 10.2 10.2 ... 0.1 0.1
Waddwngtod N. Y.......................... 20.6 20.6 20.6 ... ... .,. .. 0.16 ... ...
0 a y .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. at a... Nf ... ...













Table 2.-SHIPPING WIGHT AND VALUE OF UNITED STATES WATERBORNE GENERAL IMPORTS AND INBOUND IN-TRANSIT MERCHANDISE, ON DRY CARGO AND TANNER VESSELS,
BY CUSTOMS DISTRICT AND PORT OF UNLADING-Continued

Shipping weight in millions of pounds Value in millions of dollars

Dry cargo Tanker Dry cargo Tanker

Custo' district ni port Grand Grand
total Total General In- Total General In- total d Ttal General In- Tot General In-
imports transit imports transit imports transit imports transit


__(1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) (9) (10) (11) (12) (13) (14)

Great Lakes Districts-Continued

Rochester...................................... 598.3 598.3 598.3 (a) ... ... ... 7.4 7.4 7.4. (*)......
sego, N. Y................................. 361.8 361.8 361.8 ... ... ... ...2.1 2.1 2.1 ........
Rochester, N. Y ............................. 236.5 236.5 236.5 () ..... ... 5.4 5.4 5.4 (.) .
Sodus Point, N. Y .............................. ..... ... ............ .. .. ... ".
Buffal..................................... 2,796.6 2,757.2 2,704.5 52.7 39.4 39.4 ... 22.2 21.9 20.2 1.7 0.4 0.4
Buffalo, Y............................. 2,769.1 2,729.7 2,677.0 52.7 39.4 39.4 ... 22.2 21.9 20.2 1.7 0.4 0.4
Duluth and Superior............................ 286.2 286.2 285.4 0.8 ... ... ... 6.8 6.8 6.8 (). ...
Duluth, Minn................................. 125.4 125.4 124.6 0.8 ... ... ... 5.5 5.5 5.5 () .
Ashland, WisB ................................ ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ...
International Falls-Ranier, Minn............ 130.1 130,1 130.1 ... ... ,, .,, 0.8 0.8 0.8 ...
Superior, is............................... 12.7 12.7 12.7 ... ... ...... 0.4 0.4 0.4 ... .
Wisconsin.................................... 908.4 897.5 897.5 (1) 10.9 109 57.6 57.5 57.5 (,) 01 0.1
Milwukee.................................. 503.4 503.4 503.4 (*) ... ...... 33.6 33.6 33.6 (*) .. ...
Marinette................................... 166.4 166.4 166.4 ... ,. ... .. 9,6 9.6 9.6 ... ...
Green Bay............................... 187.8 179.6 179.6 ... 10.9 10.9 9.4 9.3 9.3 .. 01 0.1
Manitowoc................................ 8.0 8.0 8.0 ..... ... 0.3 03 0.3 ... ...
Racine ...................................... 24.5 24.5 24.5 ... .... ... 4.6 4.6 4.6 ... .
Michigan ...................................... 6,082.3 6,032.5 6,032.1 0.4 49.8 49.8 127.0 125.7 125.6 0.1 13 1.3
Detroit ................................... 5,387.8 5,365.1 5,364.7 0.4 22.7 22.7 105.3 105.1 105.0 0.1 0.2 0.2
Saginaw-Bay City ............................ 402.8 375.7 375.7 ... 27.1 27.1 .., 11.3 10.2 10.2 ... 1.1 1.1
Es canaba .,. .. ,.. .... ..................... ... ,,, <* ... ... ..: ... ..
Musegon...................................... 53.7 53.7 53.7 ... .. 3.9 3.9 3.9 ... .
Marquette ................................. ...... .... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ...
calcite ..................... ..... .......... ... ... ... ... .. ...... ... ... ... ... ... ...
Presque Isle ................... .... ....... ... ... ... ... .. ......... ... ...
South Haven.............................. 71.0 71.0 71.0 ... .. 3.4 3.4 34
Chicago...................................... 5,752.0 5,724.5 5,724.4 0.1 27.5 27.5 ... 191.5 188.7 188.7 ( 2.8 2.8
Chicago, Ill................................ 2,101.0 2,076.2 2,076.1 0.1 24.8 24.8 ... 174.6 172.1 172.1 (*) 2.5 2.5
East Chicago, Ind........................... 3,595.1 3,592.4 3,592.4 ... 2,7 2.7 ... 16.7 16.4 16.4 ... 0.3 0.3
Ohio........................................ 14,642.9 14,567,1 14,567.0 0.1 75.8 75.8 ... 139.4 137.3 137.2 0.1 2.1 2.1
leseland................................... 8,128.0 8,093.9 8,093.9 () 34.1 34.1 84.6 82.8 82.8 (*)1.8 1.8
Toledo ..................................... 1,046.3 1,004.6 1,004.5 0.1 41.7 41.7 ... 31.8 31.5 31.5 () 03 0.3
Eire, Fa.................................... 94.5 94.5 94.5 ... ... ... ... 1.9 1.9 1.9 ...
Sandusl............ ......................... 91.0 91.0 91.0 ... ,. ... () (*) (*.) ... ...
Ashtabula................................... 3,479.5 3,479.5 3,479.5 ... .. ... ... 14.7 14.7 14.7 ... ... ... ...
Conneaut.......................................... 17.3 17.3 17.3 ... ... ... ... 1.0 1.0 1.0 ...
Fairport.........................,........... 504.1 504.1 504.1 ... ... ... ... 0.2 0.2 0,2 ... ... ...
Huron -------------------.......... ... 9 9 S 1 1










JAMNUAl-DECEMBER 1962


Table 3.-5HIPPINIIG WEIGHT OF UNITED STATES EXPORTS OF DOMESTIC AND FOREIGN MERCHANDISE ON DRY :ARGO AND TANKER VESSELS, BY fRADE AREA, TYPE Of SERVICE, AMD
AMOUNT CARRIED ON UNIITED SIArES FLAG VESSELS:

(Data in millions of pounds. Totals represent the sums of unrounde*a figures, hence may vary slightly from the auma cf the rounded afr.o-ins

Fully compiled shipments'

Total all vessels Dry cargo vessel3 Tanker vessels

Grand Total ary cargo Liner Irregular
Trade area total all United United
VEarels Total States United United United Total States
flag Total State.; Total Statei Total States flag
flag Ila flagrE

(1) (2' (31 (4 i5 (61 (7) i(81 9; (10) 1.11)

Total all trade areas:
January-December 1961.............. 256,069.8 2551,047.2 36,828.2 223,6 -.5 32,,010.7 69,402.1 18,493.2 15-,2'4.. 13,51".5 31,400..7 4,817.5
January-December 1962.............. 269,151.8 268,001.0 39,069.2 239,429.4 33,775.2 b6,333.9 18,535.0 173,095.5 1:,24'0.2 28,37L.6 5,294.0

Foreign trade areas except Canadian... 224,1"8.5 223,120.7 32,482.2 !96,27c,.; 28,139.4 65,985.9 18,509.7 130,293.3 9,629.7 26,8,1.5 -,3.2.P
Caribbean................................... b,-,46.2 6,373.1 1,075.1 5,683.. 972.9 4,252.5 943.8 1,430.9 29.1 689.7 102.2
East Coasa South America.................... 9,936.8 9,921.. 1,890.7 9,335." 1,890.7 2,201.0 872.8 7,L34.7 1,017.9 585.7? ..
Vest Coast South America.................... 3,5-1.,- 3,492.5 1,180.0 3,'18.0 1 ,180.0 2,16.5 984.3 1,301.5 195.7 7'.5 ...
Vest Coast Central America and Merico ....... 558.2 53'..'. 121.8 529.8 121.8 419.6 121.1 110.2 .7? '..6
Gulf Coast Mexico........................... 832.8 829.3 11.8 80,..9 11.8 29q5.0 0,6 509.9 11.2 2'.. ...

United Kingdom and Eire..................... 13,910.2 13,882.0 751.6 12,606.2 751.6 3,876.9 751.6 8,T79.3 ... 1,275.8
Baltic, Scandinavia, Iceland and Greenland.. 8,294.4 8,240.9 7,3.t, 6,940.9 366.3 3,038.3 294..7 3,902.6 71T. 1,300.0 427.3
Bayonne-Hamburg Range....................... 54,917.8 5.,827.2 960.6 4.7,263.7 960.6 10,"59.4 870.7 36,50.,.3 89.9 7,563.5
Portugal and Spanish Atlantic............... 3,385.6 3,381.8 355.0 2,97.1 319.7 632.5 206.5 2,324.6 113. -2-.'1 35.3
Azores, Mediterranean and Black Sea ......... 43,217.2 43,166.7 7,952,0 38,598.5 o,105.1 8,081.0 2,685.6 30,517.5 3,419.5 4-,56F.2 1,8l6.9

West Coast Africa........................... 2,830.8 2,807.0 1,272.1 2,516.2 1,12".0 1,516.2 859.6 l,CO:,.,', 267.4. 290.8 1'5.1
South and East Africa....................... 1,594.8 1,566.5 901.5 1,3,7.9 905.5 1,269.8 882.3 78.1 23.2 218.6 ...
Australasia................................. 2,560.5 2,514.7 373.'. 2,092.5 175.o 1,7'9.2 27).6 3-.3.3 ... 2':..2 97.8
India, Persian Gulf and Red Sea............. 16,076.0 16,011.9 8,;70.6 12,967.2 7,200.9 6,237.0 3,-50.8 6,730.2 3,75C0.1 3,0s.-.7 1,560.7
Malaya and Indoneria........................ 1,431.1 i,13.1 551.5 1,3.0.0 551.5 1,2'78.5 426.1 151.5 125.4 53.1 ...
Far East-Southern Area, including Taiwan and
Philippines ................................ 4,816.8 -,751.3 1,874..6 ,6v.3.5 1,864.1 3,91-.3 1,788.1 729.2 76.': 107.8 10.5
Far East-Northern Area, including Japan..... 49,497,.9 '.9,40c?.1 3,61.' 43,213.9 3,533.- 1',-18.5 3,09.ot 28,795.' -438.8 6,193.2 108.0

Canadian trade areas.................. 45,003.2 44,880.2 6,587.1 -3,150.0 5,,35.9 347.9 25... 42,802.1 5,610.5 1,-30.2 951.2

.Pacific Canada.............................. 2,06-7.7 1,955.3 930.4 803.1 1I3.5 83.5 19.3 719.6 134.2 1,152.2 776.9
Great Lakes Canada.......................... 34,212.2 3-,197.6 5,236.5 33,862.3 5,098.1 122.1 6.1 33,740.2 5,092.0 335.3 138.4
Atlantic Canada and Newfoundland............ .. 8,743.2 8,727.2 4.20.1 8,'8.,5 384.2 142.3 (*) 8,342.2 384.2 242.7 35.9

*Denotes less than 50,000 pounds. 'Figures base on complete coverage of shipments valued at $500 or more. 2Figurea based on complete coverage of slupments
valued at $500 or more and an estimate based on a 10 percent sample of tre 4100-$l99 slupments. The enhances are 2 out of 3 La the lone run that the sampling error for
the figures which include estimates for the low-jalued sarlpamnta Is less than one percent or less than 50,'COX pounds. 'Claosificatlon of dry cargo veesels a&
"liner" or "irregular or tramp" Is based on characteristics of each voyage (whether the voyage is part of a scheduled bertn operation, etc. I using tre classification
criteria of the Maritime Administration.


Table 4.-S-IUPPING WEIGHT OF UNITED STATES GENERAL IMPORTS OF MERCHANDISE ON DRY CARGO AND IAaER VESSELS, BY TRADE AREA, TYPE OF SERVICE, AND AMOUNT CARRIED ON
MUITTE' STATES FLAG VESSELS:

(Data in millions of pounds. Totals represent tne sums of unrounded figure, hence may vary slightly from the sums of the rounded amounts)

Total all vessels Dry cargo vessels' Tanker vessels


Total dry cargo Liner irregular

Trade area United Uni ted
Total States Unitea United Uniaea Total States
flag Total States Total States Total States flag
flag flag flag

(1) (2) ) (41 (5; (61 (7) (8 91 (10)

Total all trade areas:
January-December 1961 ............................ 375,891.'. 30,297.1 168,3"9.5 21,812.5 38,955.3 9,338.8 129,424.2 12,4-3.7 207,511.9 8,484.6
January-December 1962'........................... 421,237.6 36,7-6.4 196,893.5 ?-,710.9 40,468.8 9,747.5 15e,424.7 14,163.- 22',3"A.l 12,035.5

Foreign trade areas except Canadian'................ 355,514.. 27,"17.5 132,001.9 15,789.6 39,138.0 9,571.5 92,863.9 6,118.1 22_3,512.5 11,927.9

Caribbean................................................. 225,585.9 L3,527.7 58,493.8 3,459.7 1,769.7 274.55 56,72'.1 3,185.2 167,092.1 10,068.0
East Coast South America.................................. 7,528.2 1,677.3 6,909,7 1,677.1 2,178.r 838.3 4,731.2 838.8 618.5 0.2
Vest Coast South America.................................. 15,42"7.8 2,557.3 15,130.0 2,557.3 2,838.3 1,231.7 12,291.7 1,325.6 297.8 ...
Vest Coast Central America and Mexico..................... 4,490.3 608.6 3,541.'- 456.7 250.2 31.5 3,291.2 425.2 948.9 151.9
Gulf Coast Mexico......................................... 9,458.1 1.2 2,060.3 1.2 696.1 0.8 1,36 ,.2 0.4 7,397.8

United Kingdom and Eire................................... 2,708.1 654.6 2,384.3 654.6 2,013.1 653.9 371.2 0.7 323.8 ...
Baltic, Standinavia, Iceland and Greenland................ 3,572.5 160.4 3,375.1 160.4 2,572.1 160.3 803.0 0.1 197.4
Bayonne-Haminug Rapge ..................................... 10,991.8 784-.2 10,579.2 78&..2 7,679.2 783.8 2,900.0 0.4 412.6 ...
Portugal and Spanish Atlantic ............................. 722.9 120.1 72;.9 120.1 416.6 119.6 306.3 0.5
Azores, Mediterranean and BMack Sea....................... 10,C09.2 959.0 4,017.2 887.5 2,522.5 771.9 1,494.7 115.6 6,032.0 71.5

Veal Coast Africa......................................... 3,955.8 533.7 3,95j.8 533.7 1,326.2 490.0 2,629.6 43.7
South and East Africa..................................... 3,954.2 1,370.2 3,708.7 1,341.4 1,851.8 1,132.0 1,856.9 209.4 2&5.5 2B.8
Australasia............................................... 2,299.1 408.8 2,298.4 408.1 1,756.9 40P.1 541.5 ... 0.7 0.7
India, Persian Gulf and Red Sea........................... 34,255.8 2,191.1 2,312.3 684.6 1,874.8 6(66.4 '37.5 18.2 31,943.5 1,506.5
Malaya and Indonesia...................................... 8,446.6 519.2 1,019.8 419.0 1,018.5 419.0 1.3 ... 7,426.6 100.2
For East-Southern Area, including Taiwan and Philippines.. 6,125.1 679.0 6,053.8 67Q.0 3,498.5 634.6 2,555.3 44.4 71.3 ...
FPar East-N.orthern Area, including Japan................... 5,940.1 96..7 5,436.5 964.7 4,87?.3 95-.8 56/.2 9.9 503.6 ...

Canadian trade areas................................ 65,723.2 9,028.9 64,891.6 8,921.3 1,330.8 176.0 63,560.8 8,745.3 831.6 107.6

Pacific Canada............................................ 7,458.4 875.6 7,192.0 813.7 199.0 151.3 6,393.0 662.4 266.4 61.9
Great Lakes Canada........................................ 16,737.1 6,729.7 16,638.6 6,691.1 286.1 23.2 16,352.5 6,667.9 98.5 38.6
Atlantic Canada and NeWfomidland.......................... 41,527.7 1,423.8 41,061.0 1,416.6 245.7 1.6 40,815.3 1,.15.0 466.7 7.2
5Cl.eesifcat lo cri dry ergo vessels as "liner" or "irregular or tramp" Is based on characteristics of each voyage (whether the voyage is part of a scneaule berth
OIaticn, ete.) using the classification cri.eTis of the Maritime Administration. 2The totals in this table include 3.0 million poun as which were carried on liner
.WSrce (f whlLch 0.2 million pound were shipped an United States flag vessels) of uranium orea and concentrates (Schedule A contodity number 6270 700) which were not
dlistrribthial by trade area.





UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA



3 1262 08587 9418 .


JAUN MA'-DuiMi Z.


Table 5.--DEPARTMiENT OP DEFENSE CONTROLLED CARGO EXPORTED BY VESSEL UNDER THE UNITED STATES FOREIGN AID PROGRAMS, AND "SPECIAL CAITEGOIY" NGI-I.ARIK OP MRFf
CONTROLLED CARGO EXPORTED BY VESSEL--COASTAL DISTRICT OF LADING BH TYPE OF SERVICE AND AMOUNTS CARRIED ON UNITED STATES FLAG AND FfOSlN IFLAG

(Shipping weight In thousands of pounds. Totals represent the sums of unrounded figures, hence may vary lightly from the sm of the wounded ants) ..


Fully compiled shipments'

Total all vessels United States flag vessels Foreign flag veaselm
Grand
Lotal.
U.S. Coastal district of lading all
vessels2 Irregular Irregular Irregular
Grand Liner or Tan*er Liner or Tanker Liner or
total service tramp vessels service tramp vessels service trmp tair
service service service

(1 I (2) ( 3) (4) "(5) (6) (7) (8) (9) (10) (U

Total all coastal districts:
January-December 1961............. 1,187,718 1,183,572 787,316 119,991 276,265 560,040 111,437 3,338 227,276 8,554 2 M,92
January-December 1962............. 1,508,367 1,505,358 1,033,575 L19,854 351,929 766,159 104,448 2,022 267,416 15,406 349i

North Atlantic parts......................... 307,900 305,588 289,598 13,293 2,698 169,103 12,736 ... 120,495 5S "
South Atlantic ports......................... 61,24.7 61,170 50,103 11,066 ... 7,247 7,058 ... 42,856 4,008 .
Gulf Coast ports............................. 565,523 565,315 205,646 12,461 3.7,208 172,853 4,299 ... 32,793 8,162 34717M
South Pacific porte.......................... 379,843 379,56. 330,056 49,508 ... 272,160 47,212 ... 57,896 2,296
North Pacific ports .......................... 11,181 171,122 140,664 30,458 ... 139,091 30,458 ... 1,573
Great Lakes port. ........................... 22,196 22,121 17,035 3,064 2,022 5,338 2,686 2,022 11,697 37
Puerto Rico, Hawali and Alaska ports ......... '.78 7.?8 473 5 ... 369 ... ... 104 5 o

'Figures oased on complete coverage of ahipmerts valued ac $500 or more. 'Figures based on complete coverage of shipments valued at $500 or more and an eastiate
based on a 10 percent sample of the $100-4-99 shipments. The chances are 2 out of 3 in the long run that the sampling error for the figures which Include esaiBlates.
for the low-value shipments 15 less than one percent or less than 500 pounded.


Table 6.-DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE CONTROLLED CARGO EXPORTED B" VESSEL UNDER UNITED STATES FOREIGN AID PROGRAMS, AND "SPECIAL CATEGORY" NON-IEPART-
MENT OF DEFENSE CONTROLLED CARGO EXPORTED BY VESSEL--TRADE AREA BY TYPE OF VESSEL SERVICE AND AMOUNT CARRIED ON UNITED STATES FLAG VESSELS:

(Shipping weight in thousands of pounds. ToLaLa represent the sums of unrounded figures, hence may vary slightly from the sues of the rounded amounts)


Fully compiled shipments'

lotal all easels Dry cargo vessels3 Tanker veaseli

Grand
Trade area total Total dry cargo Liner Irregular
all lotal United United.
vessels shipping States United United United Total States
weight flag Total States Total Staltes Total States rm .
flag flag flag
'11 12) (3) ft) (5) (6) (7) (8) (9) (10) (U) *


Total all trade areas:
January-December 1961............. 1,187,-18 1,183,572 674,815 907,30" 671,477 787,316 560,040 119,991 111,437 276,265 3,1
January-December 1962 ............. l,08,:b7 1,505,358 872,629 1,153,429 870,607 1,033,575 766,159 119,854 104,448 351,929 2,08

Foreign trade areas escep% Canadian.. 1,4.77,682 1,7.?-,680 841,967 1,L2'.,774 841,967 1,033,556 766b,144 91,218 75,822 349,906

Caribbean..................................... 20,,53 20,190 2,66b 19,820 2,66. 16,a.01 2,048 3,419 616 370 ...
East Coast South America...................... 27,100 27,085 6,429 9,076 6,.29 8,240 5,657 836 772 18,009 .,.
West Coast South America...................... Z,... 8,721 ',26. 8,729 .,26. 8,477 4,198 252 65 ......
West Coast Central America and Mexico ......... "- 72 195 724. 195 684 185 40 10 ... ..,
Gulf Coast Mexico............................. 32,7.5 32,737 ... 2,847 ... 269 ... 2,579 ... 29,890 .. "

United Kingdom and Frie....................... 10,.-'4 10,372 1,112 3,912 1,112 3,515 738 397 374 6,460 ...
Baltic, Scandinavia, Iceland and Greenland.... 24,35r 2.,212 2,68- 16,774 2,684 12,239 2,377 4,535 306 7,438
Be3onne-Hamburg Range......................... 423,786 423,127 18,742 205,410 18,742 198,295 14,240 7,115 4,503 217,717 ...
Portugal and Spanish Atlantic................. 7,115 7,083 6,523 7,083 6,523 6,759 6,199 324 324 ... ...
Unidentified countries in Western Furop ...... 86o 86b 816 866 816 851 8031 15 15 .. ..
Azores, Mediterranean and Black Sea........... 171.5b2 171,255 106,053 127,199 106,053 116,252 95,615 10,947 10,438 44,056 ...

West Coast Afrie ............................. 3,704 3,674 1,596 3,674 1,596 3,650 1,596 25
South and East Afric. ...................... 6,40 6,2.2 2,032 2,4D6 2,032 2,386 2,032 19 ... 3,836 ..j .
Australasia................................... 20,539 20,403 2,484 9,56. 2,484 9,557 2,484 7 ... 10,839 ...
India, Persian Culf and Red Sea.............. 66,205 65,8"7 57,662 65,877 57,662 60,605 52,423 5,273 5,239 ... ..
Malays and Indonesia.......................... 3,870 3,811 2,x24 3,811 2,72. 3,811 2,724 ... ... ... ..
Far East-Southern area, including Taiwan and
Philippines.................................. 265,989 265,790 256,873 262,7?? 256,873 230,576 227,227 31,901 29,647 3,313 ...
Far fast-Northerr. Area, including Japan ....... 382,595 382,501 '69,113 374,52'. 369,113 350,991 3N.5,599 23,533 23,514 7,977

Canadian trade areas.................. .... 30,681 30,676 30,662 28,65,. 28,6.0 17 15 28,636 28,626 2,022 t,022

Pacific Canada................................ 28,6.7 28,6.2 28,6.-0 28,642 28,6.0 ii 15 28,626 28,626 ...
Great Lakes Canada............................ 2,010 2,030 2,22 8 ... ... ... 8 ... 2,022 2,02'
Atlantic Canada and Newfoudland .............. ... ... ... ... ... ..

'Figures based on complete coverage of shipments valued at $500 or more. 'Figures based on complete coverage of shipments valued at $500 or more and an estimate ba a n
on a 10 percent sample of the $100-$.99 shipments. The chances are 2 out of 3 In the long run that the sampling error for the figures which include estimates ror, &4a -
value shJpments is less than one percent or less than 500 pounds unless otherwise noted. 'Classification of dry cargo vessels as "liner'" or "Irregular or tramp'i s t "
on characterisleics of each voyage (whether the voyage is part of a scheduled berth operation, etc.) using the classification criteria or the Maritime Ad etlstration.
'The sampling error Is less than 5 percent.

xml version 1.0 encoding UTF-8
REPORT xmlns http:www.fcla.edudlsmddaitss xmlns:xsi http:www.w3.org2001XMLSchema-instance xsi:schemaLocation http:www.fcla.edudlsmddaitssdaitssReport.xsd
INGEST IEID EO33D2L9D_I9YT9X INGEST_TIME 2013-03-25T15:48:58Z PACKAGE AA00010658_00116
AGREEMENT_INFO ACCOUNT UF PROJECT UFDC
FILES