Implicit Assumptions, Methodology, and the Digital Humanities - Laurie E. Gries ( Mar. 2012 )


Material Information

Implicit Assumptions, Methodology, and the Digital Humanities - Laurie E. Gries ( Mar. 2012 )
Series Title:
Digital Humanities Working Group Announcements and Agendas
Physical Description:
Mixed Material
Taylor, Laurie N.
Acord, Sophia
George A. Smathers Libraries
Place of Publication:
Gainesville, FL
Publication Date:

Record Information

Source Institution:
University of Florida
Holding Location:
University of Florida
Rights Management:
All rights reserved by the source institution.
System ID:

This item is only available as the following downloads:

Full Text


Imp l Dig i Laur i MARCH 1 SMATH E Digital H Descript i Personal anythin g For som e trying to One pro m humanis t and mak ‘method o In this b r method o “buildin g humanis t humanit i the DH W organize digital h u making c ourselve s scholars To get a t "buildin g method o forward a of our b r Bio: Lau r Digital H l icit A i tal H u i e E. Gr 1 4, 12 1PM RS LIBRAR Y umanities W i on: ly, I think Di g g you are n o e time now, distinguish m inent argu t s are conc e ing. After al l o logization’ r own bag se s o logy in rela t g ” as a meth t s be makin g i es means c r W orking Gro analyze, a n u manists in t c onsidering t s working in in moving f r t these ques t g in the digi o logy and di g a specific ar g r own bag se s r ie E. Gries i s umanities @ A ssum p u man i ies, De p Y (formerly L W orking Gr o g ital Huma n o t … a digita l scholars fro w hat make s ment, impli e e rned with r e l "if you are of the hum a s sion, I wan t t ion to the d odological i m g ? For Ram s r afting digit a u p Listserv). n d present d t he busines s t he econom i ? And perh a r om reading t ions and to tal humanit i g ital resear c g ument, I in s sion will be s Assistant P @ UF: http:/ / p tion s i ties p artme n L ibrary East) o up brown b n ities is abo u l humanist. m inside an d s the digital h e d in Steph e e ading/criti c n’t building a nities.” t to interrog d igital huma n m perative f o s ey and ma n a l born prod Such prod u ata as well a s of making ? i c, political, a a ps, more i m to making a complicate i es, I will dr a c h methods f tend to for w spent in pr o rofessor in t / www.hum a s Met h n t of E n 1st Floor C o b ag discussi o u t building t h Stephen R d outside “t h h umanities d e n Ramsey’s c ism, digital ” Ramsey a r ate the ass u n ities and t h o r the digita n y others, b u ucts (as Ter r u cts typicall y a s publish r e ? What ough a nd environ m portantly, w a s a "new ki n governing m a w on my o w f or rhetoric a w ard a serie s o ductive co n t he Depart m a nities.ufl.e d hodo l n glish o nference R o n h ings. […] If amsey h e digital h u d istinct fro m quote abo v humanists a r gues, “you u mptions un h e humaniti e l humanitie s u ilding and m r y Harpold h y afford ne w e search find i t digital hu m n mental cli m w hat exactl y n d of herme m ethodolog i w n experien c a l and visual s of questio n n versation. m ent of Engl i d u/digitalhu l ogy, a R oom you are not u manities cl u m the traditi o v e, is that w h a re concern e are not eng a derlying su c e s in genera s what exa c m aking in th h as also rec e w means to c o i ngs. But w h m anists be i n m ate we curr y is at stake f e neutic"? i cal assump t ce creating b studies. Ra t n s in hopes t i sh m.html a nd th e making u b” have be e o nal human h ile traditio n e d with buil d a ged in the c h claims ab o l. If we acc e c tly should d e digital e ntly noted o o llect, store h at else are n the busine ently find f or humanit i t ions about b oth t her than t hat the ma j e e n ities. n al d ing o ut e pt igital o n ss of i es j ority