|
 |
| UFDC Home | Search all Groups | World Studies | Federal Depository Libraries of Florida & the Caribbean | Vendor Digitized Files | Internet Archive | | Help |
|
|
|
| UFDC Home | Search all Groups | World Studies | Federal Depository Libraries of Florida & the Caribbean | Vendor Digitized Files | Internet Archive | | Help |
 Material Information
Subjects
Notes
Record Information
Related Items
|
| Full Text |
|
I ,*.*iI 'I,'. II Lq ITt a C;Efr< ...s .. , ** *: : *. '. *. : *. : * B** : ." 7 1 S. TI llu ... Blv 3 : S": -r .i r^ 4 "ii '; , -. *" : i i S INSECTICIDE I '. ACi! I H! I *i 1-4 u* sss s- j r ji: uaint to section 4" of the insecticide act] ": r;. 1Sh3O -ZfU. .. "11"j '" ': , *!J~ ~~k4' 'I' ** .*.I - ::.! S* i : - .,4iciu re,r Wailpgton,. D. .C.., ,June 24, bat' 1Ar'M w 1' 4kdnsm-sddh ^IJil^ JSoro,-a U.A, v. 1i fomen Smafl-Siud, aclsse., dado, & .Wuasen, deitie of cotadeMMttrps an. for- |. 0 et-...eCl aSdfr bond., (I. & F. No. 1554. 8. No. 227.) .....'the .tiitied States attorney for the District of Colorado, L r ,theytbeeterty of Agile'euttire, filed 'in the District Covrt tates for thie-ditrtict aforesaid"A' libel praying seizure and IdC1R deen nkall-iiied akagdk and 13 'arge-si.ed 'packages of |fldtshAg 1tbhe origiitl uibbrokenl p&ekajs at Denver, Colcd., con- *l$Jf4as Qruz. ,TemioalCo., Minneapolis, Minn., alleging t cieh ad been shipped from Minneapolis, Minn., on or about May 6, li'ed the' ,ttt t e.bp 1 f.t ther'Stfte 'of Mipnesota intO the' tite ..4 ',i gP 4a1F,4e Mt4 twthe- ;i ning of P u A^ f lS fl f *j1 **n i it *! IC IIttI ./s n alleged in the libel that the article was misbranded in that the fol- tpent,.appeardag on the label of the box obtainingg the article and . n| einLse lare (label and circular) "'Non-poisonous," (label? Sinambubrusbhes,; etc. use %%. Immerse for 10 minutes * i.g combs, brushes, etec, empty contents of one Capsule in one quart , iiem.10 minutes. Fmor metal instruments 'Immerse for 5 minutes. t ;A-. .' 9.. Sttilisinge Instruments,.fle. Make a solu- lOfbol/,ob. digsolviz.ageontents of one ,easule in one quart of water. pl aTe sues, wipe arefully.i and place in a dry I^Nia ~I Kille-gerls-- <1 ** ?It? is most power |t|bi sfmfan.y timen the. germicidal power o1 phenol .J. &YiS: .leint. iittually' 'flon-poieonous; * t, A ...z sterilAing combs, brushes, and t. roughly wita hot watet ..and. soap, or hold sterilizer," (cir- ul antiseptic and (carbolic acid)', * Sterilizing various utensils, them under the P l..fl 'Bke. s empty cdnttentS ot one capsule in one quart of teUt e.ededd.Drain .boards and some utensils that can- t1beI.mnr ,iqa, should. first be washeed with hot water and soap ..} 1 wt.(io r k solution; .*'..9* .*t For Dry Steriliuer Empty I Il esalbS Ui __.teoi. r ond the edgedtgaftltie dish.. This should be pushed tp.jt.; olItiotr A ismail amoeot wbtwateu added.: Change solution ; -,.l.P terillisang-.Hads.-BWr :Sterilising hands pre- t -- rmUfmt Stmut at thnranuab -it man andTl 'hat water Thbn * bi recea stceruize or aisinIec hands. , Misbranding was allege partially of inert ingredie sulphon-chloramide, which mitigate insects or fungi, every inert substance wer in lieu thereof, 'were the ;. an 'WOUI( not Wnen usec as air1 1 .-. .. ... d for the further reason that the Artice cpu nts, namely, substances other than so.dim :t 4 i inert ingredifets do not prevent, desfrog rq.E and, the- namentd- percentage amountt ota'id e not stated plainly an'd correctly on the litel name and percentage' amount of the stbit' ingredients having jnsecticidal or fungicidal property . o0 the itnert,& bsatsan sehtM ptiainly and:correctly-,on On December 4, 1930, the Bueger Bros. Supply Co:, having admitted the allegations of the libel and having of a decree, judgment of condemnation and forfeiture ordered by 1the court that the product be released. to payment of costs and, the execution of a bond in the in part that it be relabeled under the supervision of t AnrUus 1202. Misbraading of Margo's bottled tive, and deodoriser. U. S. v. 'Preventative, Imaeet Preventat of condemnation, forfeiture, B. No. 219.) . .. ... H ; ..' ' the- jlabe.,r .na.. w., JDenver, Cooetj 4- g consented'to,tI* was entered, &. the said. elaIdpW't sum otf $2aQ, co "O ti. is dePrtawtcnt.. , M. HYDE, Se oretarw.".... ...v.. moth preventatiye, iAhect hila=" 00 Caker of MargoPpa.S 34t. ive, and Deodorlima. ."1 and destruction. (". -& :,Io , IExamination of the product herein described having showni'thtt tue b..Ibs: represented the article to'possess certain insecticidal and deodorimng .Io2gOtd. which it did not, the Secretary of Agriculture reported the matterto tlte Julitt States attorney for the District of New Jersey. ... -: :; t1:. On or about August 21, 1930, the United States attorney filed in.athe. i.. l Court of the United States for the district aforesaid a libel praying.u.,Sre afl condemnation of 300 bottle-shaped cakes of Margo's bottled knoth peevntaetl% insect preventative, 'and deodorizer. It was alleged in thetibel that thee artitii had been shipped on August 1, 1980, by the Margo Sales o., from P .dla.delph, Pa., to Atlantic City, N. J., and that having been so transported .it rnmdt @i Wa} the original unbroken packages at Atlantic City, N. J., and that it was .a :'i branded insecticide withina.the meaning of the insecticide act of 1910.; .: :. Misbranding of the article was alleged in the libel for the rmsobnt/at .. statements, to wit, "Margo's Bottled Moth PreventatiV e Insect P tevlf. tive Its Bottled strength *, Drivesawdy. moths,KIns.ets_ .1. all vermin Bottled for home, office,store, factorwy,.i'eta.," :and1 .16f bottled strength combats undesirable odors," borne on the label affixed to eaHl. of the cakes of the article, were false and. misleading; ,and by reason Of the Mli statements the article was labeled and branded so as to deceive and itslead tte! purchaser, in t trol for moths, & office, store, facd said article wo iat ill i tory uld they represented that the article would nsects, and all vermin, would prevent all r, etc., and would combat all undesirable not be an effective control for 'moths. be ma Weftetdtve 'cpu ,insects AM. theih ,odors; Whereas "h" all iseet 'a i H:H:. r. I ~,i. *. H *. K: H': 110! ,tPP9INT s and, that it was indorsed.by ap .wbch .cotroI ud was not S- ..- T . ld-i tm e origina ed fip ,ioltion of t th.e aqrtcle was Over 78 Inactiv t eaich pf the bot ctive ingredient ,, . insect, min the ot .mnorW'than 25 p of.the article fel sold, in that it c than 25 per cent otherr reason that 1~ I 1inr was alleged for the reason t o I78.% active Inigredients ..( wqrg false Ind misleading; and b, Sla.beled and branded so as to d f-ticlc e6ntained less than 75 per c .r cent of inactive ingredients. son that the following statements, .@"l~,.. with water, on soil, sod and..turf t 'l"n insects which use the soil, sod an '.s ti 'de when employed on small l 't1] n 'pdty. areas, should be diluted wit $. s..oAd, tur, or ofrals with a spri titns, useand leeds for this merchandise c taates ppartw.ent .of Agriculture for their St..he .6Ittle abel, were false and mislead zfts tht. article was labeled and branded . #..nne ..iii.that they represented that the . ...:'rect ze control of be insects usually tft was recommended, Sad indorsed by tiozed in Department of Agriculture Circu dt.c"ed,,I.t, was an effective control of the Where ;the iaric'e when used as directed a d a h n *. r fot pe4.1,ismt4ct of. Vermont. ure 41ed in the District Court libel, saying: seizure and con- , VYt, allegng. that the article by the Union Control Corpora- ernmont, and that having been l unbroken packages and that the insecticide act of 1910. adulterated in that ,the state- e Ingredients (water) 22% to ties containing the said article, namely, substances that pre- proportion of not less than 75 er cent of inactive ingred I below the professed sta contained less than 75 pe of inactive, ingredients. water had been substitu hat the water) . y reason receive !ent of Misbra "An in control I turf as wn plot 200 gal kling ci Lents; ndard r cent Adul- ted in statements, "Active Ingre- 22% to 25.," borne on the i of the said statements the and mislead the purchaser, active ingredients and more nding was alleged for the secticide to be applied after the larvae, pupae, and egg s a breeding place. * s or ordinary surroundings lIons of water and sprinkled In. * * an be secured by writ Department Circular ng; and by reason of d so as to deceive an article when used as y controlled with such this department; tha lar No. 363 and that insects mentioned in would not be an effec ly controlled with such applications; it was n ths department; it was not mentioned in circu directed it would not be an effective control said. circular. 0, all'.parties in interest having failed to answe and the court having found that. the product he libel, judgment of condemnation was ente art that the product bq destroyed by the United ot Recommenda- ing the United No. 363, borne the said state- d mislead the directed wvonuld 1ap' t it whe said tive rec locationss ; was men- n used as circular.; control of )mmended lar No. 363 and of the insects .r or file a claim was misbranded red and it was States marshal. *. .... ... ..: ARTHUB M. HYD, Uecretary of Agrictutre. * .r" ..J ,J i. .. bAEIni of tia-Way lice and mnite spools for poultry. UI. S. v. T27 a.... ..:r :. 'W... .-la n l a n n. A... a.4 a .~.---- Ind'igl. it was redients and more alleged for the fur trtcle I F ~ iieMjj I ~CTI spools foir ioaltry.' It was' hll by theM-Oniex Labb*htbrWes, ' from thI State of Iowa into transported it remained in the and that it *&s a' misbrand4d the inisecticide eAct df 1910. Misbranding of the article statements, to wit, "Sta-Way'] and Mites off of Poultry. The Fumes Drive off the Lice ahd' Them Under the RooSts," borE training the 'said article, were : statements the article was label purchaser into the belief that it mites, and would disinfect the the said article when used as poultry lice and mites, and woti On March 3, 1931, no claimai condemnation was entered dnd destroyed by the United States !U a9L/. ged in tl ihbetelthatfhe aft edMr Rapids, Iowa, on. or .b6 the State of Kansas, sad 't Signal .unbroken ledkages f#eeticide and f1gicide wil a Alleged in the libel for the " and %Iite Sbools for Poultrf .Zt is sit on thb Roosts ovtr the eo * H ~. fl* H.... ~~u111 'I: .. I*%'* ..ra H H .. .. HH .1 LA I. F:. . .- ,* Disinfects ..t d., i the label"affixed to each of the b x&b. Sand misleading; and by reason. Of the dM and brahded so as to deceive and mislead iti Iuld be an effective control for pouitrjr lice aMn Iltry houses when used as directed; wher4S *ected would not be an effective control k6t lot disinfect poultry houses. aving appeared for the property, judgment of was ordered by the court that the product bE *rshal. A-THUR M. HYDE, Seoretary of Agriculture, tin" 1205. Misbranding of Plea of guillty. Blgler Protecto powder. U. S. v. G. Fine, $10 and costs. (I. & F. No. 1480. . highNer Ca. Ddm. No. 22129.) Examination of samples interstate shipment showed fluoride than represented; claimed to possess; and it f On June 12, 1928, the U Illinois, acting u District Court of against the G. R. by said company 8, 1926, from the Bigler Protecto p It was alleged the statements, Fluoride 1.8%." were fal was cont M "Bi and born "Bi hair T I I of Biglh that it it did ailed to united S pon a report by the United Stat SBigler Co., a co in violation of th er Protecto powder from the herein-described contained less nicotine, sulphur, and sedihfl not possess certain insecticidal propertieC it declare inert ingredients as required by ii, states attorney for the Southern District .f the Secretary of Agriculture, filed in tt2d es for the district aforesaid an infbrmatidn rporation, Springfield, Ill., alleging shitpmnht e insecticide act of 1910, on or about October State of Illinois into the Sta owder which was misbranded. in the information that the "Active Ingredients Nicotine borne on the label affixed to misleadin and by reason labeled so as to deceive and mislead gained less nicotine, sulphur, and sodium isbranding was alleged for the further re: gler Protecto Powder Formerly Put Out Plants of Many Insects and Lice Which ie on the label of the said bags, togeth gler IXL Dry Dip Directions For Hors r. Dust thoroughly places they beds, floors on the floor over night. cracks. Do Dip foi n.-4 :*im in beds into the sleep. ind crack of their For PC not dust r winner .naf^ ta- Sn/ a ha Fo ms sl nl ( and On nd about the ir and blanke r Hogs. Dust of their houses keeping places, try, Sprinkle the poultry. stalls. t over thorot . For and ov about Same Summer," appearing te of Missouri, of a quantity article was misbranded .1%, Sulphur 4.0%, the bags containing the the said statements the the purchaser fluoride than since said labeled. in that Sodium articl0 artikl6 articia ason that the following statements, as I. X. L. Dry Dip Relieves Stocp Retard Growth and Sap Vitality," er with the following statements, es. Brush it thoroughly into the For Cattle. Where lousy, rub night, throw liberally in beds or . ughly over the hogs and in their Colds or Flue. Scatter thoroughly - er the hogs and shut the hogs up tAie>. cicken< hnr Lditntn direction in the c fr- n~~r ^jnn for mangy condition. The ircular accompanying the .nPt-'T,, -, ,.. ,, -d ",v^rta ,t I 1 claimedin the* claimed in the above-quoted statements A.' from the bag label was alleged for the ht rther reason thai the article consisted .un wa- a -.... -. au auaa- .-.,- S. -2 Itnert subutances or ingredients, namely, substances that do not Cstroy, repel, or mitigate insects, and the name and the percentage of each and .every one of the said inert ingredients present in the HBWere not stated plainly and correctly on the label affixed to the bag l.lnb the article; nor, in lieu thereof, were the name and percentage tof each and every ingredient of the article having insecticidal prop- s, and the total percentage of the said inert substances or ingredients ent in the article stated plainly and correctly on the said label. n September 30, 190, a plea of guilty to the information was entered on alof the defendant company, and the court imposed a fine of $10 and costs AaRTHU M. HYnb, Secretary of Agriculture. * I. Zr) A*~ *~ 411M3'i I.. * :~ '~. t .1 I < L~PILUISt .. . 144 Iii di. at Imiis4fl .11. *.r di * It INDEX TO NOTICE OF JUDGMENT 101-12U N. J. No. Bigler Protecto powder: Bigler, G. B., Co..........------- 1205 Chloro-Zol: American Drug & Chemical Co--_ 1201 Margo's bottled moth preventative, in- sect preventative, and deodorizer: Margo Sales Co.- -. ----.... -. 1202 98 N. N. Sta-Way lice and mite pool. for poultry: M-Onez Laboratories__--_-_.. 10S Ucco' Union Control Corporation....... 120 .i "i* 1. I. I * I ' ?kUJ. I jp. * I .,L... he A-..; ~ ~1 * ..si H~ H~. I. IH**. I. j.:h. :~ :=Y'r- .: LI as ~s. .~ *, .--H .~jflji I c.j~HI. ~.. 5 H* H I. t H ~.I.II.. H I.E.. . ... Hj * -~ In H .~ H *I*. . I.IIH II~. W.H~hi H N :r::t. *HI* . HI Pr Al. ~ S. HH* .. I II!: C 4 -. SI.. H ~. ~ III... ... i...1> I... L.fl.i. H it *HIL..j 4EEIb. *HH:.15..rH .. ...!.. i... S.:. V .-.. .... 4 t IF *fl. I.E * .EHh" Hi~ .. *~'hS.h .4. rH. ... A ~ H .. **. *... *1k - i LIH V I. '*1. I .4 1 I. 4. 4.. I.' I. 1* J. I. 4 * C. |