![]() ![]() |
![]() |
UFDC Home | Search all Groups | World Studies | Federal Depository Libraries of Florida & the Caribbean | Vendor Digitized Files | Internet Archive | | Help |
Material Information
Subjects
Notes
Record Information
Related Items
|
Full Text |
li:, .. N.J., I.F.R 317-331 /47 23 Issued August 1961 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH SERVICE PLANT PEST CONTROL DIVISION NOTICES JUDGMENT FUNGICIDE, UNDER AND THE FEDERAL RODENTICIDE INSECTICIDE, Nos. 317-331 The following notices of judgment relate to cases arising in the United States District Courts and are approved for publication as provided in section 6 of the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act (7 U.S.C. 135d). L. R. CLARK Acting Administrator, Agricultural Research SON, Service. WAsHINGTON, D.C., June 15,1961. $1t. Laelk of registration and misbranding of "STAPH 12 HOSPITAL TESTED BACTERIACIDE." U.S. v. 13 one-pint bottles, more or less, of "STAPH 12 HOSPITAL TESTED BACTERIACIDE." Default decree of condem- nation, forfeiture and destruction. (I.F. & R. No. 369. I.D. No. 38512.) The p4ruct reslerM wunde examination of were false and whmn used as di "STAPH 12 r the Federal the product misleading si reacted, could idiseae or kill all germ - -..t November 1, 196( bla, acting upon a repo States District Court a 1 15 one pint l bottles, 1 BACTERIACIDE" at economic poison which bfy Save-Mor Drugs, on It was allIed that -Agrieutuir 'as required It mas' tllegWd that HOSPITAL T Insecticide, I showed that nce they impli be relied upon I t ii is, whereas it would ), the United States irt by the Secretary ibel praying seizure i more or less, of " DSTED I ungicide, he label ed or rep to prevent not be e Attorney of Agric or conde. STAPH Washington, D.C., alleging had been offered for sale in or about November 4, 1960 i the product was not register by section 4 of the act. 'the product was misbrande the act in'that its labeling bore the statements "Staph 12 HOSPITAL 3ACTERIACIDE" was not and Rodenticide Act. An ing bore statements which presented that the product, it all human infections and effective for these purposes. for the District of Colum- ulture, filed in the United nation and confiscation of 12 HOSPITAL TESTED that the product was an I the District of Columbia in violation of the act. red with the Secretary of ,d within the meaning of ONE PINT ACT 246 INSECTICIDE, FUNGICIDE, AND RODENTICIDE ACT [I.F.R.N.J. FOR BACTERIACIDAL CLEANLINESS GENERAL CHEMICAL CORPORATION, WASHINGTON, -t . D.C. USE STAPH 12 to disinfect-kill germs -deodorize hat.hrooms-sick rooms, baby's room-scrub diaper pails. WASH-walls, woodwork, furniture. 4% oz. per gallon of waiter MOP UP-public rooms, floors, linoleum, tile. 1 oz. per gallon of water. SLSH--toilet bowls--tubs kitchen drains garbage disposal installation. 1 oz. per gallon of water. LAUNDRY-babies' diapers, bed linen. % oz. per gallon of water. ANIMAL AREXAS-pet kennels and other areas. 1,4ox per gallon of water. SICK ROOM-toilet seats, bed pans, beds, .... all washable articles. ;i Sosz. per gallon of water. :|i and such statements were false or misleading since they implied or represented 1 that theprodlu when used as directed, could be relied upon to prevent all human infections and iUseases r kill all germs, whereas, the product, when used as J directed, could not be relied upon to prevent all human infections and diseases . or kill all .germu p.: On January 11, 1901, no ciimant having appeared, a decree of condemnation, forfeiture and destruction Wr "entered, and the United States Marshal was . ordered to destroy the produce 318. Lack of registration of "NEW POOLENE POOL PURIFIER" U.S. v. 515 sixteen-ounce containers, more or less, of "NEW POOLENE POOL PURFIIEBL Default dtest of condemnation, forfeiture and destruc- H tion. (I3.E & R. No. 364. I.D. No. 38320.) The product "NEW POOi ElN POOL PURIFIER" was not registered under .iI the Federga Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act. On September 19, 4I9, ~ Tnited States Attorney for the Etasrn sic of New ark acting upen a report by the-.Secretary of Agriculture, filed in the United States District Court a libel praying seizure for condemnation and :Hi confiscation of 515 sixteen-ounce containers, more or less, of "NEW POOLENE . 1p0o, PURIIERy'. at Jamaica, Long Island, N.Y., alleging that the product was an economic poison which had been transported interstate on or about April 14, 1960, by Home Products Division, Edsal Manufacturing Company, from Hightstown, N.J., in violation of the act. i It was alleged that the product was not registered with the Secretary of . Agriculture as required by section 4 of the act. .. Jr *1. H. *""":! EE" 1:" EiEEi 81T-s81.31 NOTICES JUDGMENT ~24?' On June 21, 1960, the United States Attorney for the District of Madsaehetts, acting upon a report by the Secretary of Agriculture, filed hi thi Unlited Stats District Court a libel praying seizure for condemnation and colseation df: 1,581 fourteen-ounce containers, more or less, of "NEW IMPTIOVED DIAPER- WITE," at Boston, Mass., alleging that the product was an economic poison which had been transported interstate, on or about March 30, 19f0; 'y Diaper- wite, Inc., from New York, N.Y., in violation of the Federal Inseeicide, Fgi- cide, and Rodenticide Act. It was alleged that the product was misbranded within tie meaning of the act in that its labeling bore the statements: WITH "NEW, IMPROVED DIAPERWITE HEXACHLOROPHENE TO STOP DIAPER RAMI the Complete DIAPER WASH 1 DISINFECTS 2 WASHES NO SOAP O; BLEACH REQUIRED a a K ; 1 < B / DIAPERWIT The Double-Duty. (s perfect for ALL :WWVIE THIN*4Se;. * Nylon, roen, gd K allS yii14eSs I: DIREOTIONS SBY SOAKING Rinse out soiled matter from V" j t~li I(i;:vr diapers before drb1ppirg them in D lt fiite solwtione Prepare solution Diaperwite in a gallon pail of hot water while tfirl g. Drop diapers in this solution to soak ver night.. Rinse soaked diapers twice in hot water and twice in cold water. After 4ryg, diapers. are-ready to use. FOR First wite Then mach otEher perw other of Di nload A," WASHING MACHINE , soak diapers in Diaper- solution for one hour. place diapers in washing line (do not mix with Stings in wash). Use pia- ite as you would any * powder (about cup iaperwite to a regular . No noan n r hblnr-h i v:x T:""r~i~x bj~, :" :I1":~, ~ r : B",,,,l~g,: ...:;: i~ kk~L r e, r i " """I a r i :I" r .... EE. %, ::" ":" ""B I "1 * A"~~****Pi: iuNwtN ~ 248 INSECTICIDE, FUNGICIDE, AND RODENTICIDE ACT [I.t.R.N.j. It was alleged further that the product was misbranded within the meaning : of the act in that its label did not bear an ingredient statement giving the name and percentage of each of the active ingredients, together with the total per- centage of the inert ingredients, or an ingredient statement giving the names of each of the active and each of the inert ingredients in the descending order of the percentage of each present in each classification, together with the total percentage of the inert ingredients. On October 10, 1960, no claimant having appeared, a decree of condemnation and forfeiture was entered and it was ordered that the product be destroyed, by the United States Marshal or given by him to a public or charitable institution for use, and not for sale, as a waspin powder and not a disinfe4aSe .1 320. Lack of registration, misbranding, and adulteration of "NEW AQUALENE POOL SANITIZER." U.S. v. 212 eight-ounce bottles, more or less, of "NEW AQUALENE POOL SANITIZER." Default decree of condem- nation, forfeiture, and destruction. (I.F. & R. No. 365. I.D. No. 37080.) The product "NEW AQUALENE POOL SANITIZER" was not register. under the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act. An examination of the product showed that it contained less than 6 percent of sodium hypo- chlorite and more than S9 percent of inert ingredients and that the labels ofe .. containers bore an ingredient statement which set forth variable percentage for the active and inert ingredin .sa On September 17, 1960, the Unit;i states Attorney for the Eastern District of South Carolina, Chrleston Division, acting upon a report by the Secretary of Agriculture, filed in the United States District Court a libel praying seizure for condemnation and conflscationa 2 prf g-. bottles, more or less, of "NE_ AQUALENE POOL SANITIZ.R," at Chatiest6n, S.C., alleging that the product was an economic poison which had been transported interstate, on or about May 31, 1960, by lodent Chemical"[aptu, Inc., from Detroit, Mich, in viola- tion of the act, It was alleged that the product was not registered with the Secretary of Agri- culture as required by section 4 of the act. It was alleged that the product was misbranded within the meaning of the act in that its labeling bore the statements: ... "New Aqualene POOL SANITIZER OC6MPLET 4-AY P00 4i n; ; KEEPS SAFE, Disinfectant Algaecide Bactericide Fungicide POOLS CLEAN, GERM-FREE PROTECT YOUR CHILDREN'S HEALTH USE Aqualene I I art-f-dlu NOTICES JUDGMENT 44f~ SMALL PLAYPOOLS Approximately 4 feet to 6 f capfuls. LARGE PLAYPOOLS Approximately 8 feet to 14 fi capfuls. On exceptionally warm or sunny days, double the 4 first treatment, then treat pool with above amour on usage of pool. With heavy bathing loads use i hours. Aqualene is harmless to children and pets. will provide a safe, clean pool throughout the summer Contains: Active Ingredients-Sodium Hypochlorite, Inert Ingredients, 92%-94% Iodent Chemical Co., eet In length, use 4 eet ixi lcith, tse 10 above osage on the its dailf, depending Aqualene every four If used as directed r. %-%ichigan petroit 1, IMichigan" and such statements were false or misleading since they implied or represented (1,) that the product may contain 8 percent but not less than 6 percent of sodium hypochlorite, (2) that the product contained not more than 94 percent of inert ingredients, and (3) that the product, when used as directed, would make pools germ-free; whereas, (1) the product contained less than 6 percent of sodium hypochlorite, (2) the product contained more than 94 percent of inert ingredients, and (3) the product, when used as directed, wouli not make pools germ-free. It was alleged further that the product was adulterated in that its strength or purity fell below the professed standard or quality under which it was sold, in that it contained less than 6 percent of sodium hypochlorite and more than 94 percent of inert ingredients. On December 1, 1960, no claimant having appeared, a decree of condemnation and forfeiture was entered, and the United States Marshal was ordered to destroy the product. r 321. Lack of registration, lack of required information, and misbranding of '"GARDENLITE INSECT REPELLANT" and "BAN-O-BUG INSECT REPELLANT." U.S. v. 264 containers, more or less, of "GARDENLITE INSECT REPELLANT" and 1.816 containers, more or less, of "BAN-O- BUG INSECT REPELLANT." Default decree of condemnation, for- feiture, and destruction. (I.F. & R. No. 367. I.D. Nos. 37925 nid 87926.) The products "GARDENLITE INSECT REPELLANT" and "BAN-O-BUG IN- SECT REPELLANT" were not registered under the Federal Insecticide, Fuaz cide, and Rodenticide Act, and an examination of the products showed that the labels affixed to the containers of the products did not bear statements of net weight or measures of contents of the containers. The g~amination further showed that the labels did not bear ingredient statements as required by the act and the labels affixed to the containers of the products did not beat state- ments giving the name and address of the manufacturer, registrant, or person for whom the products were manufactured. On October 24, 1960, the United States Attorney for the Northern District of Illinois, Eastern Division, acting upon a report by the Secretary of Agriculture, filed in the United States District Court a libel praying seizure for condemnation and confiscation of 264 containers, more or less, of 'fGARDENLITE INSECT REPELLANT" and 1,816 containers, more or less, of "BAN'O-BUG INSECT REPELLANT," at Franklin Park, Ill., alleging that the products were economic poisons which had been transported interstate on or about July 20, 1959 by the :::. **... :.. .. ': ... 250 INSECTICIDE, FUNGICIDE, AND RODENTICIDE ACT [LF.B.N.J, . .i.H. iHi.: 323. Misbranding of "SURE PURE WATER PURIFIER." U.S. v. 5 articles, more or less, of "SURE PURE WATER PURIFIER." Default decree of condemnation, forfeiture and destruction. (Q.F. & R. No. 371. I.D. No. 38452.) Te device' sURi PiR W'wnrmJFI "' was recommended for purify- ing water on business pleasure, adqthp! types of trips. The purpose was to assure safe water *en trelg in where only unsafe water was available. However, when tested, the product wap ineffetive for these purposes. On December 15, 1960, the United Stat Axney for the District of Columbia, acting uponra repotrbyite Secretury of Agriculture, 1fiied in the United States District Court a libel, praying seizure for condemnation and confiscation of 5 articles, more or less, tt prodte "SURE PURE WATER PURIFIER" at Washington, D.C., d tleig that the product was a device which had been sold in the Distriet of olumtnbia by Surplus Sales Co., on or about September 1, 1960, in violation of the act. It was aIfhgef that thl uet was misbranded within the meaning of the act in thatQit lkAbeing st t lni p.rt: jURE A Guarantee dof SafeSweet Water " Dat Spoil tha Business oi Pleasure I a SURE PURE Water Fill Trip ter X x ""~rIBtPS KEEt:, .i total percentage of the inert ingredients, or, in the alternative an ingredient statement giving the names of each of the active and each of the inert ingredients in the descending order of the percentage of each present in each classification, together with the total percentage of the inert On November 18, 1960, no claimant having.appeared, a default depe of ;; condemnation and forfeiture was entered, and it was ordered that the United - States Marshal destroy the products. 322. Lack of registration of "COMAR MUSKET." U.S. v. 524 two-pound con- tainers, more or less, of "COMAR MUSKET." Default decree of con- demnation, forfeiture and destruction. (I.F. & R. No. 377. I.D. No. 39123.) Thte "poAduct O.AR MUSKET," was not registered under the FederaL- n secticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act. On F&itary l4 1t the T United States Attorney for the Districtn f Mfni land, A~tiig upon a irepot tby the Secretary of Agriculture, filed in the United States Dtstrlet COrt a libel, praying seizure for condemnation and confiscation of 524 t-pmund containers, more or less, of "COMAR MUSKET" at Hebron, Md., a~ig that the prect was an economic poison which had been trans- ported intstate on or about October 25, 1960, by Comar Industries from White- stbiii &4J in violation of the act. It was alleged that the product was not registered with the Secretary of Agri- culture as retired uidter secftin 4 t he act. On March 2, 1961, ino claimant having appeared, a decree of forfeiture and condemnation was entered and the United States Marshal was ordered to destroy the product. 3 .7-ai1] NOTICES JUDGMENT 25i Why risk debilitating sickness, discon ness or pleasure time, take a SURE PUR system to pure, clean and sweet drinl travel. SURE PURE uses a filter system that tested and in use in many parts of the is used to protect the potable water United States on his personal airplane 65 of the world's major airlines. Safe Water for the Traveler To the Sportsman One of the most troublesome detai enthusiast, hunter, fisherman or just So-called safe water may be turbid, s Spring, stream, river and lake water Getting, carrying and keeping drin the sportsman. All of this can be in your pocket. You next stream, pond, lal ing pure, clean, sweet The SURE PURE stomach to wander containers. avoided siphon ke or ra water. purified where fort and loss of valuable busi- IE water purifier and treat your king water wherever you may has been repea tq laboratory world for 30 yes. This filter used by the President of the and is standard equipment on Safe Water for Sportsmen Is confronting a camper, boating plain hiker is his water supply. ;alty and odiferous. can be anything. king water is usually a chore to by tucking a SURE PURE water purifier your drinking and cooking water from the in puddle and rest assured that you are us- r gives you you peace o will without mind and peace of encumbering water Your SURE PURE water purifier has been tested by an independent laboratory to determine te efficiency of the filter elements in removing bacteria, coliforms, turbidity, odors, chlorine and salt water. These tests proved that your SUR)E PURE filter will protect you and assure safe sweet drinking water from all normal sources. 7The test program was severe and the results assuring. The results are compared for your information. River water-6300 to 2 Bteria/O to 2olim Shallow wells-1500 Bacteria/mi Deep wells-84 to 160 Bacteria/ml Unpolluted Springs-50 Bacteria/mi City water (acceptable) Less than 100 Bacteria/ml Coliforms 1 or 2 colomnes.100ml Your SURE PURE filter was tested wth water containing 190,00 Ba teria/mi and 31,0(0 coli/ml. No Ba2 ppa and N o Coliforms were found in the water flowing from the ~B5E PURE unit. Other tests proved that SlUBI PURiE moves all odors, all objee- tionable tastes and even most of the slt m tidal waters. SURE PURE removes all chlorine from heavily treated water. Your SURE PURE filter gives prnfrom the first to the last drop. It needs changing only when the flow is ireued to a trickle. HOW'TO USE'YOUR SURE PURE FILTER IThere is a filter element in your SURE PURE I itL It is properly x ~"x~ 252 INSECTICIDE, FUNGICIDE, AND RODENTICIDE ACT [ I.F...NJ: and such statements were false or misleading since they implied or represented that the product, when used as directed, (1) would assure safe, pure drinking water from all normal sources, (2) would purify water from streams, ponds, l lakes, rain puddles, wells, and other normal sources, and (3) would remove all . bacteria and coliforms from water; whereas, the product, when used as directed, (1) would not assure safe, pure drinking water from all normal soarece, (2) ' would not purify water from streams, ponds, lakes, rain puddles, wells, or other normal sources, and (3) would not remove all bacteria and coliforms from water..1 On January 17, 19,11, no claimant having appeared, a default decree of condemnation and destruction was entered and the United States Marshal was ordered to, destroy the product. 324. Lack of registration of a product, paper vacuum cleaner bags labeled in part "TREATED WITH NOMORGERM." U.S. v. 84,950, more or less, i taper vacuum cleaner bags labeled in part "TREATED WITH NOMOR- GERM." Default decree of condemnation, forfeiture, and destruction. S(I.F. & R. No. 376. I.D. No. 38385.) iL; The product, paper vacuum cleaner bags labeled in part "TREATED WITH .ii NOMORGERM" was not registered under the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act. On January 27, 1961, the United States Attorney for the District of New Jersey, acting upon a report by the Secretary of Agriculture, filed in the District Court a libel, praying seizure for condemnation and confiscation of 84,950, more or less, paper vacuum cleaner bags labeled in part "TREATED |;: WITH NOMORBItM"" at .Nw Brunswick, N.J., and alleging that the product *! was an economic poison which had been transported interstate on or about January 11 and January 12, 1961, by Paper Products, Inc., from Saugerties, N.Y., and Broklp N.YJ ino latlon of the act. It was alleged that the product was not registered with the Secretary of Agriculture as r rel section 4 of the act. On April 4 196 o pt ing appeared, a decree of condemnai on a forfeiture was et0red, ait he United States Marshal was ordered to destroy - the product. : 325. Lack of registration and misbranding of "M.E.D. MYCOBACTERIAL 4 ETHICAL DISINFECTANT." U.S. v. 163 eleven-ounce containers, more '. or less, of "M.E.D. MYCOBACTERIAL ETHICAL DISINFECTANT." Consent decree of condemnation and release under bond. cI.. & .. 339. I.D. No. 97586.) The product "M.E.D. MYCOBACTERIAL ETHICAL DISINFECTANT" was , not registered under the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act. An examination of the product showed that the labels borne by the product did not bear an tingreent state nt i~ a l Mited by the act. On December 16, 1U9 t TUnited States Attorney for the Western District ,i of Missouri, Western ivii acting upon a report by the Secretary of Agri- culture, filed in th District Court a libel, praying seizure for condemnation r and confiscation of 163 eleven-ounce containers, more or less, of "M.E.D. MYCO- I BACTERIAL ETH I AL DISINFECTANT" at Kansas City, Mo., and alleging that the product was an economic poison which had been transported interstate:. on or about November 18, 1959, by M.E.D. Corporation of America, from Chicago, Ill., in violation of the act. 2: Tf two, ao a llnnnAn 4l< 4, 4 an A.n t a.. ti nJ c4-a..aaI ..i4 43. a Onn-n4. .w.. aC A-S .' I.* I .31" r31]-' NOTICES OF JUDGMt ruary 20, 1961, a decree of condemnation was e the product be released to the claimant under suck CENT 253 entered and it was ordered that Bond. 32. Misbranding of "STAPHEX BACTERICIDE DEODORANT FUNGICIDE AEROSOL SPRAY." U.S. v. 140 containers, more or less, of "STAPHEX BACTERICIDE DEODORANT FUNGICIDE AEROSOL SPRAY." Con- sent decree of condemnation and release under bond. (I.F. & R. No. 370. I.D. No. 38288.) The product "STAPHEX BACTERICIDE DEODORANT FUNGICIDE AEROSOL SPRAY" was recommended as a bactericide for disinfecting arti- cles and equipment in hospitals. found to be ineffective for these pu On November 28, 1960, the United of New York, acting upon a report the District Court a libel, praying of 140 containers, more or less, of " FUNGICIDE AEROSOL SPRAY," a was an economic poison which had June 3, 1960, by Thomasson of Pet violation of the act. It was alleged that the product w act in that its labeling bore the stall However rposes. States by the seizure STAPH when tested, the product Attorney for the Southern District Secretary of Agriculture, filed in for condemnation and confiscation EX BACTERICIDE DEODORANT t New York, N.Y., alleging that the product I been transported interstate on or about insylvania, Inc., from Norristown, Pa., in ras misbranded within the meaning of tements: "STAPHEX is a Bactericide and Fungicide lasting residual activity. STAPHEX may b economically when applied according to direct lasting effect against organisms makes it outs there is danger of re-infestation. Due to the cation, many hidden areas not before reached can now be fully protected. iith amazing and )e used effectively ons. STAPHEX's standingg in areas aerosol method of with aqueous solu long- and long- where appli- itions S * DIRECTIONS FOR HOSPITAL ROOMS: After discharge of patient and following usual checkout cleaning. Spray mattress, pillows, bed frames, toilet, and other accessories. A systematic spraying program will kill many bacteria, fungi, and odors. SUGGESTED USES: Operating room equipment, nursery cribs, linen closets, labor rooms, utility tables, telephones. Daily spraying of the shoe soles of Doctors, Nurses, and Key Personnel. ALSO SPRAY OUTER TO SIDE OF ALL SURGICAL DRESSINGS PREVENT ODORS. * S 5" and such statements were false or misleading since they implied or represented that the tericide room eq phones, implied directed, product, when used as directed, could be ri for disinfecting mattresses, pillows, bed uipment, nursery cribs, linen closets, labor shoe soles of doctors, nurses, and key person by the term "other accessories;" whereas, could not be relied upon to act as a b mattresses, pillows, bed frames, toilets, operating lied upon frames, t rooms, ut nnel, and the produ actericide room eqi to act as a bac- :oilets, operating ility tables, tele- all other articles ct, when used as for disinfecting lipment, nursery )I, L I 254 INSECTICIDE, FUNGICIDE, AND RODENTICIDE ACT [I.F.B.N.JI 327. Misbranding of "D.G.F. SPRAY DEODORIZER GERMICIDAL FUNGI- CIDAL." U.S. v. 188 containers, more or less, of "D.G.F. SPRAY DE- ODORIZER GERMICIDAL FUNGICIDAL." Default decree of condem- nation, forfeiture, and destruction. (I.F. & R. No. 368. I.D. No. 38041.) The product "D.G.F. SPRAY DEODORIZER GERMICIDAL FUNGICIDAL" was recommended as a germicide, fungicide for use on surgical instruments, operJing tables, and other equipment. It was also recommended For coDptio varis types of bacteria. However, when tested, the product was found to be ineffctive for these purposes. On br 23, 1960, the United States Attorney for the Northern District of Calltkrnia, acting upon a report by the Secretary of Agriculture, filed in the United States District Court a libel, praying seizure for condemnation and confiscation of 188 Tontainers, moe or leps, of "D.G.F. SPRAY DEODORIZER GERMIQIDAL FUNGIOIDATL" t Oakland, Calif., alleging that the product was an Ceonoie poison which had been transported interstate on or about June 190, Iby Chase Products Co., from Broadview, Ill., in violation of the act. It was alleged that the product was misbranded within the meaning of the act in that its labeling bore the statements: "D-G-F SPRAY DEODOIZER-ECG I DA L- -FUNG ICIDAL D-G-F Deqdprizer, Geric ideal gFdEungicidal Spray is a powerful space and surface ermicidal--etiv against both gram positive and gram negative bacteria. D-G-F effectively controls resisanta strains of staphylococci; salmonella typhosa; shiella paradysenteriae; salmonella schottmuelleri; eschericia coli (Colon infections) microcossus pyogenes var. aureus, streptococcus pyogenes, mycobacterium smegmatis. 'It is also effective, against gigLi such as trichophyton interidigitale. D-G-F is an excellent deodorizer and chemically destroys odor producing bacteria. Reduces hazards of arborne infectious viruses. Use D-G-F to disinfect surgical instruments, operating tables and other equipment. Use D-G-F to sanitize and deodorize waiting rooms, laboratories, oper- ating rooms, examination rooms, kennels and other confinement areas. DIRECBTIONS FOR USE Clean object to be sprayed using usual cleansing methods. As a germicidal surface spray, hold >spenser Upright and spray 6 to 8 inches from surface until surface is wet. Avoid contamination of food stuff. As a deodorizer and air sanitizer, hold can upright and point valve opening away from face. Spray upwards into corner of room as well as center of room, filling room with mist. CAUTION The contents of this container are under pressure. Do not puncture container nor dispose of same in fire or incinerator. Container not be stored in direct sunlight or where temperature exceeds 120 degrees F. Do notwet ar sh painted or plastic surfaces with this spray. a** n QO rl C@lift c h~a4-ta~v4e a xjw~ TE PChT*A cirA A^ha Wi^-alj a jlvft AnM9#a-S we ran +TA-W 4 wwa d1 u dkwa *M^vunwhomm na -j 317-331] NOTICES JUDGMENT 25~ senteriae, salmonella schottmuelleri, eschericia coli (Colin infections) miCrocos- sus pyogenes var. aureus, streptococcus pyogenes, mycobacterium smegmatis, and trichophyton interidigitale in spaces or on surfaces. On May 1, 1961, no claimant having appeared, a decree of condemnation and forfeiture was entered, and the United States Marshal was ordered to destroy the product. 328. Lack of registration, misbranding and adulteration of "DAVIS KAPUT." U.S. v. 460 ten-pound bags, more or less, of "DAVIS KAPUT." Default decree of condemnation, forfeiture, and destruction. (I.F. & R. No. 375. I.D. No. 35864.) The product "DAVIS KAPUT' cide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide that it contained 0.24% of disc 2.25% disodium methylarsonate such that when used as directed vention of crabgrass nor would i of crabgrass seeds. On January 31, 1961, the Uni of Illinois, acting upon a report was not registered under k Act. An examination of idium methylarsonate hex hexahydrate as claimed. the product would not be t kill crabgrass or prevent ted .by States A the Sec United States District Court a libel, praying fiscation of 460 ten-pound bags, more or less. Ill., and alleging that the product was an ecoi ported interstate on or about June 12, 1959, Brunswick, N.J., in violation of the act. It was alleged that the product was not Agriculture as required by section 4 of the act. The product was alleged to be misbranded that its label bore the statements: the Federal Insecti- the product showed ;ahydrate instead of The deficiency, was effective for the pre- further germination attorney for the Northern District retary of Agriculture, filed in the seizure for condemnation and con- , of "DAVIS KAPUT" at Chicago, nomic poison which had been trans- by W. A. Cleary Corp., from New registered with the Secretary within the meaning of the act in "ACTIVE INGREDIENTS **Disodium Methylarsonate hexahydrate **Total Arsenic as Elemental,,all in Water Soluble Form 2.25%' 0.r58%6 and such statements were false misleading since they implied or represented that the product contained 2.25% of disodtoi methylarsonate hexahydrate and 0.58% of water soluble arseni .whereas, the product contained less than 2.25% of disodium methylarsonate hexahydrate and less than 0.58% of water soluble arsenic. : It was alleged that the product was further misbranded within the meaning of the act in that its label bore the statements DAVIST~ 1!: 117 PT 0 "" A r ^^ 4, "f KILLS d'1-i A' 'N .L~ r nccE 1" :: h Vy,8 i "": xg I ""f i:i i ~ "~"B rrslE~ , 256 INSECTICIDE, FUNGICIDE, AND RODENTICIDE ACT [I. F.r.NS. When may KAPUT be used? Any time of the year!! (see chart below) IONS FOR USE OF KAPUT Apply evenly the contents of bag by mechanical spreader ov of lawn area : (50 ft. x 50 ft or 25 ft. x 100 ft. etc.). (Rins grass after application). In rare instances a second application may be necessary. is apparent within 10 days, make second application. THESE DIRECTIONS APPLY TO APPLICATIONS AT OF THE YEAR TIME TABLE OF MAY 1 TO JULY er 2500 sq. ft. e granules off If no "kill' ANY TIME APPLICATION - 1. Will kill existing crabgrass and will prevent further germination of crabgrass seeds. S.. /JL 1 t:' o~tk 15 Some crabgrass prevention will be in- dicated the following summer from this treatment. OCTOBER 15 TO APRIL 30 - :1. ivnssa~m f Will prevent crabgrass for the fol- lowing summer. *** :;. S I ... 3 < and such statement *6te false or misleading since they implied or represented that the product, whef t ub S iArectp (1) would effectively prevent crabgrass, (2) would effectively kill crabgrass, an (3) would effectively prevent germina- tint trabgraSs ds; .e the product, when used as directed, (1) would i not efetively prevent craibgrass, (2) would not effectively kill crabgrass, and (8) wotd t effectively prevent germination of crabgrass seeds. It was allged that e hpd~ket was further misbranded within the meaning ,,, of the act in that the ingredient statement did not appear on that part of the immediate container of the retail package which is presented or displayed under customary conditions of purchase, that is, on the front panel. It was further alleged that the product was adulterated within the meaning of the act in that its strength or purity fell below the professed standard or quality as expressed on its labeling since its labeling bore the statements: , "*** ACTIVE INGREDIENTS **Disodium Methylarsonate hexahydrate 2.25% S.. *Ftantl- Arannir an flarinantal sail in Wa tc Rnlnhal, DIRECT :trj NOTICES OF j l--431i NOTICES OF JUDGMENT 329. Misbranding and adulteration of "DIAMOND G-P-K DISINFEC 'ANT" U.S. v. 173 one-gallon cans, more or less, of "DIAMOND GA-K DISI1, FECTANT." Consent decree of condemnation and release under bond. I T T& flR NTo nIn Tf l1n7t * a. a w *L. .t 5 The label of the p phenol coefficient of .5 for floors, walls, base However, when used a tested it was found to On September 12, 1 ware, acting upon a r States District Court of 1783 one-gallon cans, Wilmington, Del., alle been transported intej tional Chemical Labo violation of the act. It was alleged that act in that its labeling product ) and w ments, s direct possess 960, the report b, a libel, , more o going th: state o ratories "DIAMOND G-P-K DISINFECTA T" claimed a as recommended for use as a general disinfectant sinks, bathrooms, and other places and surfaces ed, it was not effective for these purposes and what a phenol coefficient of less than 5., . United States Attorney for the District of Detl II a 11 the Secretary of Agr rayingg seizure for con less, of "DIAMOND ( t the product was an i or about February 2Z of Pennsylvania, Inc., the product was misbranded bore the statements: icultu idemn 3-P-K econo 3 and from with re, filed in the United action: a0 confiseati DISINFECTANT" at mie pojtAs which had Apri 11 tk60, by Na- Phladelphia, Pa. in n the meaning f tfli "DIAMOND G-P-K DISENFECTANT PHENOL COEFFICIENT 5 F.D.A. METHOp PINE OIL DISINFECTANT Phenol Coefficient 5 F.D.A. METHOD Disinfectant-Deodorant--Germicide--Cleaner A POWERFUL PLEASANT DISINFECTANT, GEMI: CIDE AND DEODORANT WHICH IS GUARANTEED TO BE 5 TIMES STRONGER THAN PURE CARSBOLI ACID WHEN TESTED AGAINST THE E. TYPHQSA GERM BY THE F.D.A. METHOD ESPECIALLY RECOMMENDED FOR: GENERAL DISINFECTING OF FLOORS, WALLS iU8 BASEMENTS, SINKS, BATHROOMS, TOILETS, UIti OUTHOUSES, STABLES, KENNELS, CO OR ANY SURFACE, TO PREVENT THE TERIA. AS A DEODORANT WHICH IS N 1 TO 3 HOURS AFTER USE. OPS, CUnDO iy w SPREAD OF BAC1, hOT1CEAFlj jft hi A" E /4 ii j < aw4f ~l * DIRECTIONS FOR USE GENERAL DISINFECTING: Remove all filth premises and use a solution of one part Pine Oil - .- parts of water. This mixture acts a4 a disinfectant ',,germ. SS, and such statements were and 1::t Disinfeata against E .*^ ~ / . the nt7100r . Typhesa i,1 rTh false or misleading since there implied or represented IlUI VIV`IVII IN S EUTCIB FUNGICIDE, AND BODENTIOIDE ACT [I.P.a.NJ. It was further alleged that the product was adulterated within the meaning Of the act in that its strength or purity fell below the professed standard or quality as expressed on its labeling, since its labeling bore ,the statement, "Phenu Coefficient 5 F.D.A. METHOD," whereas the product had a phenol coeficient of less than 5 F.D.A. method. Catini chemicall Laboratories of Pennsylvania, Inc., Philadelphia, Pa., claimed ownership of the product and requested its release under 'bond pursuant to the' act and consented&6 the entry of a condemnation decree. On January 7, 1961, a decree of condemnation was entered and it was ordered that the product be released to the claimant under such bond for bringing the product into confliwliknce wth the act 3M0. Mbrafddin and adrlteration of "CHEMCIDE SODIUM HYPOCHLO- RITE SOLUfIlOT~ U.S. v. 76 one-gallon containers, more or less, of i EfMCIDE SODIUM HYPOL~EORIDH SOLUTION." Decree of con- i de*iation and forfeiture (fL.t & IL No. 373. I.D. No. 37788.) SThe trituct 'd ifMCIDr si) M HYPOHLORITE SOLUTION" was 3prq eintefl to contain 40% sodium hyporite. However, upon examination two samples were found to contain SA and 5.60'%, respectively, of sodium hypochlorite. On January 19, 1961, the United BStates Attorney for the District of Kansas, acting upon a report by the Secretary of Agriculture District Court a libel, praying seizure for condemn a one-gallon containers, more or less, of ~'OHEFCID RITE SOLUTION"'.t tWihita, Kan., ape" aihath th poison which had been transported interstate on o Chemco Products, Inc., from Tulsa, Okla., in violation It was alleged that te product wa.y Psbrandild act in that its labeling bore the statements "***S~oiujj Iypochlorite t / *:^-- I^n : r9(*. filed in t on and SODIUM product about J Fthe act. ivithin ;he con IM wa ruli United States fiscation of 76 HYPOCHLO- Ls an economic 7 13, 1960, by the meaning of the 0% 09.*4*" and such M~ oent were fI iisleaddtince they implied or represented that the ~rodu4et Mctsited 10 6fsbdittim ~titrite and 90% of inert ingre- dients; whereas th' product contained l es thiki i0% of sodium hypochlorite and more ian 9A'of 4ni~ nigredi ts. It was alleged that the product was adulterhted within the meaning of the act in that its strength or parity felt od:eH po~i feesed standards or quality as expressed pth it0 labeling sined i bei boii the statement, "Guaranteed Active Izrditis; <iHypohlde 1 ,"Whereas~ the product contained less that lodinmi hpdhl rte. On Marc b %de t of c emuntfon and forfeiture was entered, and it was o6Aiied that tle^ Anct be: delivered to the Institute of Logopedics, Wichita, Kans. 831. Lack of registration gf ?'thER'S CHEESE FLAVORED WARFARIN RAT & MOUSE KILt*R PELLETS," "TYLER'S READY MIXED WAR- FARIN EAT & MOUSE KILLR BAIT," and "TYLER'S WARFARIN CONCENTRATE RAT AND MOUSE KILLER." U.S. v. 162 one-pound eintainers, more or oIs, of ER'S CHEESE FLAVORED WAR- FARIN RAT & MOUSE KILLER PELLETS;" 186 one-pound containers, more or less, and 42 five-pound containers, more or less, of "TYLER'S iii r UIATlV MiTRii WAUWARITN RAT. A MOIITE KITI.I.RR RAiTI" an fl J 17-al31] NOTICES JUDGMENT 259 containers, more or less, of "TYLER'S CHEESE FLAVORED WARFARIN SRAT & MOUSE KILLER PELLETS ;" 186 one-pound containers, more or less, and 42 five-pound containers, more or less, of "TYLER'S READY MIXED WAR- FARIN RAT & MOUSE KILLER BAIT;" and 38 four-ounce containers, more or less, and 5 one-pound containers, more or less, of "TYLER'S WARFARIN CONCENTRATE RAT AND MOUSE KILLER," at Portland. Oreg., and alleging that the products were economic poisons which had been transported interstate on or about December 16, 1960, January 3, January 11, January 19 and February 7, 1961, by Tyler Products, from Puyallup, Wash., in violation of the act. It was alleged that the products were not registered with the Secretary of Agriculture as required by section 4 of the act. Subsequent to the seizure action the products were registered with the Secre- tary of Agriculture. C. Frank Tyler, an individual, claimed ownership of the products and on May 12, 1961, a consent decree of condemnation was entered and the products were released to the claimant. INDEX TO NOTICES OF JUDGMENT 317-331 N.J. No. Ban-O-Bug Insect Repellant Penn Wax Works, Inc.-. Chemeide Sodium Hypochlor- ite Solution Chemco Products, Inc_-_ Comar Musket Comar Industries - D.G.F. Spray Deodorizer Chemical Fungicidal Chase Products Co .. - Davis Kaput W. A. Cleary Corp ... Diamond G-P-K Disinfectant 'National Chemical Lab- oratories of Pennsyl- vania, Inc--..--- Gardenlite Insect Repellant Penn Wax Works, Inc-.. M.E.D. Mycobacterial Ethical Disinfectant M.E.D. Corporation of America New Aqualene Pool Sanitizer KIodent Chemical Co., Inc. New Improved Diaperwite Diaperwite, Inc...... N.J. No. New Poolene Pool Purifier Home Products Division, Edsal Manufacturing Co. -m m- a- -m -m m -m -m - Staph 12 Hospital Tested Bacteriacide Save-Mor Drugs----. Staphex Bactericide Deodor- ant Fungicide Aerosol Spray Thomasson of Pennsyl- vania, Inc..---------- Sure Pure Water Purifier Surplus Sales Co. ---. Treated with Nomorgerm Paper Products, Inc...--.. Tyler's Cheese Flavored War- farin Rat & Mouse Killer Pellets Tyler's Ready Mixed War- farin Rat & Mouse Killer Bait Tyler Products ........-- Tyler's Warfarin Concentrate Rat and Mouse Killer Tyler Products...----....... :E,::" 18: ""E:"EE: "--" : " .I**** 4ti I i. I . h .'c.*., '-.1 ..n 1. .4%.S 4::i ?:1 I = kt ;' .7! * 'tjn : *4 2i. I I ~ a I. ,.... ...:' .:;:E: " .." iii. .: IH II*I. " """ " """ ,,i,,i, ::JEE:J:::J :i ~" :"" UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA o i i ii UI HIII 111liiI1 IB 11111111ii 3 1262 08588 8377 PX ;;I ;iji I~r' |