![]() ![]() |
![]() |
UFDC Home | Search all Groups | UF Institutional Repository | Sciences | Food and Agriculture | UF Institutional Repository | | Help |
Material Information
Subjects
Notes
Record Information
|
Full Text |
FEASIBILITY OF A STATE FARMERS MARKET IN THE SUWANNEE RIVER VALLEY OF FLORIDA Prepared By: J. R. Rich, T. H. Lashley, C. Hodge IFAS Agricultural Research and Education Center Live Oak, Florida REVISED DRAFT MARCH 14, 1986 In Cooperation With: Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services Florida Farm Bureau Suwannee County Chamber of Commerce Cooperative Extension Services [Columbia, Hamilton, Lafayette, Madison, and Suwannee] FOREWORD The economic survival of North Florida is dependent upon the success of its agricultural industries. While the state as a whole has experienced an economic boom in recent years, those areas where agriculture is the economic base have suffered. Agricultural finance experts estimate that between 1,500 and 2,000 farms in Florida will fail from January 1986 to June 1987, with 80 to 90 percent of these in North Florida. The extent of the crisis in North Florida reaches far beyond the farm family itself, to affect the entire economy of the region. This is the first in a series of studies into alternatives for small farmers and indeed agriculture as a whole in North Florida. The viable alternatives for North Florida would include the addition of a strong vegetable production component to the predominant mixed row crop and livestock systems. A prominent problem in vegetable production has been inaccessiblity to markets. As a result growers in the Suwannee River Valley area of Florida have long sought a State Farmers' Market or a similar facility for their emerging vegetable industry. Efforts from the local Farm Bureaus and Chambers of Commerce of Suwannee, Hamilton, Madison, Lafayette and Columbia counties have resulted in feasibility studies in Columbia (1978), Lafayette (1983), and Suwannee Counties (1984). Attempts at securing assistance over the past 8 years, however, have not led to suitable conclusions. An analysis of the situation indicates that the lack of a consolidated, regional data base might have contributed to the inability of this region to obtain the requested assistance. This study, involving five counties in the area (Columbia, Hamilton, Lafayette, Madison, and Suwannee), was conducted to provide such a base from which appropriate decisions could be made. RESULTS SUMMARY The five county area that this study centered upon includes over 350,000 acres of cultivated land, with over 30,000 of those acres under irrigation (Table 1) Sufficient quantities of vegetables were shown to be produced to qualify for a major State Farmers Market according to DACS guidelines (J. L. McMullen report, watermelon shed report, North Florida feasibility study). The 1985 DACS feasibility study of a State Farmers' Market in North Central Florida states that a minimum of about 200 acres of mixed vegetables are required to support a profitable grading, packing, and shipping business and 600 acres are needed to support a marketing facility. In the five county study area alone growers produced at least 3,414 acres of mixed vegetables (plus 9,000 acres of watermelons) for the fresh market in 1985 (Table 2). Also the profitability of several crops grown in the area can be demonstrated (Tables 3-12). This acreage, then, should provide a basis for a strong, viable, and competitive state marketing facility. Most of the fresh vegetables grown in the area go to the Thomasville, Ga. market; however, without a major regional marketing or shipping/packing facility further expansion of the vegetable industry is doubtful (Figure 1). In addition to the adequate agricultural resources, a marketing facility would benefit from two major advantages inherent to the Suwannee River Valley the name Suwannee and the crossing of major interstates 1-10 and 1-75 (Figure 2). For example, the area near 1-10 and 1-75 has been suggested to be an ideal location for a facility to mix vegetable -oads from other areas of Florida. Additionally, as one looks to the future, statewide population increases have created pressure for the urbanization of agricultural lands. Many of the traditional Florida vegetable producing areas have felt this urban encroachment and, if population projections are realized, will be affected even more in the next ten years. The Suwannee River Valley has large yet unused agricultural acreages and resources, and has not been affected as greatly as have the agricultural areas of south and central Florida. The increasing population coupled with increasing per capital consumption of fruits and vegetables can greatly enhance the market for Suwannee River Valley produce. Data in this report suggest that the area has most of the positive aspects that would support operation of a large facility nearly year-round. Such a facility would require a strong cooperative effort between IFAS, DACS, and the Florida Farm Bureau to assure not only success, but continued economic expansion in North Florida. LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1. The Florida State Farmers' Markets: Small Vegetable Markets are those that have limited vegetable handling facilities, or that handle low volumes of vegetables. Major Vegetable Markets are those that have full vegetable handling facilities and move a variety of vegetables. Figure 2. The Suwannee River Valley of North Florida. S SUWANNEE VALLEY AREA * SMALL VEGETABLE MARKETS O MAJOR VEGETABLE MARKETS * POTENTIAL NEW MARKET SITE 0 WAUCHULA TKA PLANT CITY FORT &C I C? ,vc3,o. LIVE OAK Table 1. Total cropland and irrigated land in five counties of the Suwannee River Valley in 1982.a Acres of Cornt-v Cultivated Land Acres of Trriaated Land Columbia Hamilton Lafayette Madison Suwannee 62,948 40,597 4,036 3,572 35,761 5,250 85,251 5,584 126,832 13,001 Totl 1 31,443A Source of data: 1982 Census of Agriculture. The Cooperative Extension Services in these counties estimate that about 38-45% of that irrigated land was idle in 1985. R1.-IRQ ~__~ -- ---~- 1"-'~V- Table 2. Acreages of vegetables and watermelons grown for market in five counties of the Suwannee River Valley, 1985. County VegetablesA Watermelonsb Columbiac 107 2100 Hamilton 705 300 Lafayette 1000 3000 Madison 490 900 Suwanneed 1112 2700 Total 3414 9000 aSource: Values for Columbia and Lafayette counties are based on estimates from the Cooperative Extension Service, while the other values are based on actual grower contacts. Source: Florida Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services, Division of Marketing. cColumbia County also reported 72 acres U-pic and 75 acres grown on contract. In addition there were 26 acres U-pic and 880 acres grown on contract in Suwannee County. Table 3. Vegetables (fresh) that were rated high in both profitability (50% of score) and the ability of growers to produce (50% of score)*. Vegetable Bell Pepper Collards Eggplant Mustard SOkra Peppers (mixed) Rutabagas Southern peas Turnips Relative Score 23 20 21 16 28 23 20 17 16 Comments Good prospects Experience in the area Good for small acreages Experience, collard companion High value, small acreage Small acreage, bell pepper comp. Good competitive potential Experience in the area Experience, collard companion *Scoring systems based on 0-30, with 30 indicating a very high relative profitability and relative ease of production with farm resources now in place. Profitibility ratings were determined by anticipated income (season long average price/bushel, and bushels/acre) less cost of production based on production and handling budgets. The ability of growers to produce was determined by six criteria (farm infrastructure, biophysical environment, financial risks, required management, handling or packing, and whether demand is continuous or short lived). Table 4. Harvest months and availability of selected vegetables grown in the Suwannee River Valley Area of Florida. CROPS BELL PEPPER COLLARDS EGGPLANTS MUSTARD OKRA RUTABAGAS SOUTHERN PEAS TURNIPS JAN. FEB. MAR. APR. MAY JUNE JULY AUG. SEPT. XX XXXX XX XXXX XX XX XXX XXXX XX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XX XX XXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX YY YY YYY VVVY OCT. XXXX X XXXX XXX XXX XXX YYYY NOV. XX XXXX XXXX X XX X YyYY CIRCULAR 473 UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA PORTFOLIO 11-6M-84 UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA (X) indicates quantity expected to be available due to growing season conditions (e.g., a freeze) or to time of year. Four X's indicate full production expected in any one month. DEC XX XXXX XXXX YYYY DEC. i ^^ ^^ ^^^ ^^^^ PROFITABILITY DATA Staff at the IFAS AREC, Live Oak, have studied over 50 vegetable crops that could be or are presently grown in the Suwannee Valley area of Florida. Studies were predominately based upon crop profitability as determined through published production, shipping and handling charges. Seasonal average prices for the 1984 and 1985 seasons at the Thomasville, GA market were utilized to determine relative gross income from the vegetable crops. Where data were not available, information from Other universities or private concerns was gathered. These data should be utilized as a guide, not as a definitive of either production costs or profitability of crops. Listed on the following pages are some crops that show promise for profitability in the Suwannee Valley area of Florida and are currently grown in varying amounts throughout the area. Table 5. Estimated production costs and income mixed peppers in the Suwannee Valley. for bell peppers or ITEM UNIT QUANTITY PRICE AMOUNT PRE-HARVEST VARIABLE COSTSa PLANTS/SEED 1,000 14.0 9.50 133.00 LIME Ton 0.4 24.00 10.00 FERTILIZER 15-20-20 Cwt. 8.0 8.00 -64.00 SIDEDRESSING 15-0-31 Cwt, 4.0 6.90 27.60 INSECTICIDE Est. 30.00 FUNGICIDE Applic. 5.0 9.30 46.50 NEMATICIDE Est. 50.00 HERBICIDE Est. 16.00 MACHINERY Hourly 6.0 4.00 24.00 LABOR Hourly 8,0 3.50 28.00 IRRIGATION Applic. 5.0 10.00 50.00 INTEREST ON OPER. CAP. (479.10) Annually 0.5 .12 28.75 TOTAL PRE-HARVEST VARIABLE COSTS 507.85 PRE-HARVEST FIXED COSTS MACHINERY Hourly 6.0 6.00 36.00 IRRIGATION Acre 1.0 35.00 35.00 LAND TOTAL PRE-HARVEST FIXED COSTS 25.00 96.00 TOTAL PRE-HARVEST COSTS HARVEST AND MARKETING COSTS PICKING AND HAULING GRADING AND PACKING SrnTANTMP 603.85 Each Each MARKETING Each_ TOTAL HARVEST AND MARKETING COSTS 1.00 1.00 i nn f;nn 1 lnn rnn--------- --1- _- TOTAL ESTIMATED PRODUCTION COSTS PER ACRE (5.01/carton) 600.00 600.00 __6mLOL 2,400.00 3,.003.85 ESTIMATED GROS 9INCQiMEZACREb I2/.74 2aronl ______44iAA ESTIMATED NET INCOME/ACRE 1,040.15 production costs were adapted for the Suwannee Valley Area from Circular 473 "Growing Quality Vegetables in Florida," University of Florida and "1985 Vegetable Enterprise Cost Analysis," University of Georgia. Estimated income is based on the Thomasville, Ga. Market average for 1984 and 1985. - _iAdid--M--__ --- ----- ------- _______ 600 600 cnn Table 6. Estimated production costs Suwannee Valley. and income for collards in the ITEM UNIT QUANTITY PRICE AMOUNT PRE-HARVEST VARIABLE COSTSa PLANTS/ SEED ___lb. 40 2.95 11.80 LIME Ton 0.4 24.00 10.00 FERTILIZER 15-20-20 __ Ct. 7.3 8.00 58.64 SIDEDRESSING 26-0-13 Cwt. 2.3 7.70 17.86 INSECTICIDE Est. 24.00 FUNGICIDE Applic. 3,0 9.30 27.90 NEMATICIDE Q---_________________________0 HERBICIDE Est. 10__, MACHINERY Hourly 3.0 4.00 12.00 LABOR Hourly 3.5 3.50 12.25 IRRIGATION Appli c. 3.0 10.00 30.00 INTEREST ON OPER. CAP. (214.45) Annually 0.5 .12 12.87 TOTAL PRE-HARVEST VARIABLE COSTS 227.32 PRE-HARVEST FIXED COSTS MACHINERY Hourly 3.0 6.00 18.00 IRRIGATION Acre 1.0 35.00 35.00 LAND 25.00 TOTAL PRE-HARVEST FIXED COSTS 78.00 TOTAL PRE-HARVEST COSTS 305.32 HARVEST AND MARKETING COSTS PICKING AND HAULING Dozen 500 .50 250.00 GRADING AND PACKING (Ice) Dozen 500 1.00 500.00 CONTAINER Dozen 500 2.00 1,000.00 MARKETING Dozen 500 1.00 500.00 TOTAL HARVEST AND MARKETING COSTS 2,250.00 TOTAL ESTIMATED PRODUCTION COSTS PER ACRE (5.11/carton) 2,555.32 ESTIMATED GROSS INOEAC l 6.82/carton) 3,410.00 ESTIMATED NET INCOME/ACRE 854.68 production costs were adapted for the Suwannee Valley Area from Circular 473 "Growing Quality Vegetables in Florida," University of Florida and "1985 Vegetable Enterprise Cost Analysis," University of Georgia. Estimated income is based on the Thomasville, Ga. Market average for 1984 and 1985. Table 7. Estimated production costs and income Suwannee Valley. TTRM IINTT PRE-HARVEST VARIABLE COSTS PLANTS/SEED LIME FERTILIZER 15-20-20 SIDEDRESSING 15-0-31 lb. Ton Cwt rwwt OIANPTTTV for eggplant in the PRTCR AMOUNT 92.00 10.00 64.00 27.60 4.0 0.4 8.0 A n INSECTICIDE Est. 24.00 FUNGICIDE Applic. 4.0 9.30 37.20 NEMATICIDE Est. 50.00 HERBICIDE Est. 16.00 MACHINERY Hourly 6.0 4.00 24.00 LABQR Hourly 8.0 3.50 28.00 IRRIGATION _Applic. 4.0 10.00 40.00 INTEREST ON OPER. CAP. (412.00) Annually 0.5 .12 24.77 TOTAL PRE-HARVEST VARIABLE COSTS 436.77 PRE-HARVEST FIXED COSTS MACHINERY Hourly 6.0 6.00 36.00 IRRIGATION Acre 1.0 35.00 35.00 LAND TOTAL PRE-HARVEST FIXED COSTS 25.00 96.00 TOTAL PRE-HARVEST COSTS HARVEST AND MARKETING COSTS PICKING AND HAULING Each GRADING AND PACKING Each CONTAINER Each MARKETING Each TOTAL HARVEST AND MARKETING COSTS 700 700 700 '7n n _ 50 .50 1.00 1.00 350.00 350.00 700.00 700.00 2,100.00 TOTAL ESTIMATED PRODUCTION COSTS PER ACRE (3.76/carton) 2,632.77 ESTIMATED GROSS INCOME/AC Eb (4.96/carton) ESTIMATED NET INCOME/ACRE 3.472.00 839.23 production costs were adapted for the Suwannee Valley Area from Circular 473 "Growing Quality Vegetables in Florida," University of Florida and "1985 Vegetable Enterprise Cost Analysis," University of Georgia. Estimated income is based on the Thomasville, Ga. Market average for 1984 and 1985. 532.77 ''~'' ""' ""~~"~ -- I -- _ I vv - --- -- `r ~-~---- 23.00 24.00 8.00 A_ on Table 8. Estimated production costs and income Suwannee Valley. for mustard in the ITEM UNIT QUANTITY PRICE AMOUNT PRE-HARVEST VARIABLE COSTSa PLANTS/SEED lb. 4.0 2.95 11.80 LIME Ton 0.4 24.00 10.00 FERTILIZER 15-20-20 Cwt. 7.0 8.00 56.00 SIDEDRESSING 26-0-13 Cwt. 1.2 7.70 8.93 INSECTICIDE Est. 24.00 FUNGICIDE Applic. 3.0 9.30 27.90 NEMATICIDE 0.00 HERBICIDE Est. 10.00 MACHINERY Hourly 3.0 4.00 12.00 LA___ Hourly _3.5 3.50 12.25 IRRIGATION Applic. 3.0 10.00 30.00 INTEREST ON OPER. CAP. (202.88) Annually 0.5 0.12 12.17 TOTAL PRE-HARVEST VARIABLE COSTS 215.05 PRE-HARVEST FIXED COSTS MACHINERY Hourly 3.0 6.00 18.00 IRRIGATION Acre 1.0 35.00 35.00 LAND 25.00 TOTAL PRE-HARVEST FIXED COSTS 78.00 TOTAL PRE-HARVEST COSTS 293.05 HARVEST AND MARKETING COSTS PICKING AND HAULING Dozen 300 0.50 150.00 GRADING AND PACKING (Ice) Dozen 300 1.00 300.00 CONTAINER Dozen 300 2.00 600.00 MARKETING Dozen 300 1.00 300.00 TOTAL HARVEST AND MARKETING COSTS 1,350.00 TOTAL ESTIMATED PRODUCTION COSTS PER ACRE (5.48/carton) 1,643.05 ESTIMATED GROSS INOEA b(6.82/carton) ESTIMATED NET INCOME/ACRE 2.046.00 402.95 production costs were adapted for the Suwannee Valley Area from Circular 473 "Growing Quality Vegetables in Florida," University of Florida and "1985 Vegetable Enterprise Cost Analysis," University of Georgia. Estimated income is based on the Thomasville, Ga. Market average for 1984 and 1985. '-~--~ --`r-~~-~~~ -~------ Table 9. Estimated production costs and income for okra in the Suwannee Valley. T]NTT OHiANTTTV PRTCR AMAnNT PRE-HARVEST VARIABLE COSTSa PLANTS/SEED lb. LIME Ton FERTILIZER 15-20-20 Cwt. SIDEDRESSING 26-0-13 Cwt. INSECTICIDE FUNGICIDE NEMATICIDE HERBICIDE MACHINERY Hourly LABOR _Hourly IRRIGATION Applic. INTEREST ON OPER. CAP. (286.36) Annually 0.4 6.0 12.0 ' n 2.40 24.00 8.00 7 70 4.00 3.50 in nn 19.20 10.00 56.00 17.86 Est. 12.00 Est. 9.30 Est. 50.00 Est. 16.00 24.00 42.00 30 00 TOTAL PRE-HARVEST VARIABLE COSTS 303.54 PRE-HARVEST FIXED COSTS MACHINERY Hourly 6.0 6.00 36.00 IRRIGATION Acre 1.0 35.00 35.00 LAND 25.00 TOTAL PRE-HARVEST FIXED COSTS 96.00 TOTAL PRE-HARVEST COSTS 399.54 HARVEST AND MARKETING COSTS PICKING AND HAULING Bushel 300 3.00 900.00 GRADING AND PACKING Bushel 300 1.00 300.00 CONTAINER Bushel 300 1.00 300.00 MARKETING Bushel 300 1.00 300.00 TOTAL HARVEST AND MARKETING COSTS 1,800.00 TOTAL ESTIMATED PRODUCTION COSTS PER ACRE (7.33/cartonl 2.199.54 ESTIMATED GROSS INCOME/ACREb (12.45/carton) 1.73 s n ESTIMATED NET INCOME/ACRE 1,535.46 Production costs were adapted for the Suwannee Valley Area from Circular 473 "Growing Quality Vegetables in Florida," University of Florida and "1985 Vegetable Enterprise Cost Analysis," University of Georgia. Estimated income is based on the Thomasville, Ga. Market average for 1984 and 1985. ITEM _ ___ __ Z , , 0 5 0 12 17 18 ~'" '" "" _ ~ Table 10. Estimated production costs and income the Suwannee Valley. for rutabagas in ITEM UNIT QUANTITY PRICE AMOUNT PRE-HARVEST VARIABLE COSTSa PLANTS/SEED lb. 4.0 2.95 11.80 LIME Ton 0.4 24.00 10.00 FERTILIZER 15-20-20 Cwt. 7.0 8.00 56.00 SIDEDRESSING 26-0-13 Cwt. 1.2 7.70 8.93 INSECTICIDE Est. 24.00 FUNGICIDE Applic. 3.0 9.30 27.90 NEMATICIDE 0.00 HERBICIDE Est. 10.00 MACHINERY Hourly 3.0 4.00 12.00 LABQR_ Hourly 3.5 3.50 12.25 IRRIGATION Applic. 3.0 10.00 30.00 INTEREST ON OPER. CAP. (202.88) Annually 0.5 .12 12.17 TOTAL PRE-HARVEST VARIABLE COSTS 215.05 PRE-HARVEST FIXED COSTS MACHINERY Hourly 3.0 6.00 18.00 IRRIGATION Acre 1.0 35.00 35.00 LAND 25.00 TOTAL PRE-HARVEST FIXED COSTS 78.00 TOTAL PRE-HARVEST COSTS 293.05 HARVEST AND MARKETING COSTS PICKING AND HAULING Bushel 400 .50 200.00 GRADING AND PACKING (Wax) Bushel 400 1.00 400.00 CONTAINER Bushel 400 1.00 400.00 MARKETING Bushel 400 1.00 400.00 TOTAL HARVEST AND MARKETING COSTS 1,400.00 TOTAL ESTIMATED PRODUCTION COSTS PER ACRE (4.23/carton) 1.693.05 ESTIMATED GROSS INCOME/ACREb (6.20/carton) 2. n nn ESTIMATED NET INCOME/ACRE 786.95 production costs were adapted for the Suwannee Valley Area from Circular 473 "Growing Quality Vegetables in Florida," University of Florida and "1985 Vegetable Enterprise Cost Analysis," University of Georgia. Estimated income is based on the Thomasville, Ga. Market average for 1984 and 1985. - --------- Table 11. Estimated production costs and income for southern peas in the Suwannee Valley. ITEM UNIT QUANTITY PRICE AMOUNT PRE-HARVEST VARIABLE COSTSa PLANTS/SEED lb. 20.0 1.20 24.00 LIME Ton 0.4 24.00 10.00 FERTILIZER 15-20-20 Cwt. 4.0 8.00 32.00 SIDEDRESSING 15-0-31 Cwt. 1.0 6.90 6.90 INSECTICIDE Applic. 6.0 8.50 51.00 FUNGICIDE Applic. 1.0 9.30 9.30 NEMATICIDE Est. 25.00 HERBICIDE Est. 10.00 MACHINERY Hourly 6.0 4.00 24.00 LABOQR Hourly 8.0 3.50 28.00 IRRIGATION Applic. 5.0 10.00 50.00 INTEREST ON OPER. CAP. (270.02) Annually 0.5 0.12 16.21 TOTAL PRE-HARVEST VARIABLE COSTS 286.23 PRE-HARVEST FIXED COSTS MACHINERY Hourly 6.0 6.00 36.00 IRRIGATION Acre 1.0 35.00 35.00 LAND 25.00 TOTAL PRE-HARVEST FIXED COSTS 96.00 TOTAL PRE-HARVEST COSTS 382.23 HARVEST AND MARKETING COSTS PICKING AND HAULING Each 200 1.50 300.00 GRADING AND PACKING Each 200 .50 100.00 CONTAINER Each 200 1.00 200.00 MARKETING Each 200 1.00 200.00 TOTAL HARVEST AND MARKETING COSTS 800.00 TOTAL ESTIMATED PRODUCTION COSTS PER ACRE (5.91/carton) 1.182.23 ESTIMATED GROSS INCOME/ACREb (7.68/carton) ESTIMATED NET INCOME/ACRE 1,536.00 353.77 -a production costs were adapted for the Suwannee Valley Area from Circular 473 "Growing Quality Vegetables in Florida," University of Florida and "1985 Vegetable Enterprise Cost Analysis," University of Georgia. Estimated income is based on the Thomasville, Ga. Market average for 1984 and 1985. -- Table 12. Estimated production costs and income Suwannee Valley. for turnips in the ITEM UNIT QUANTITY PRICE AMOUNT PRE-HARVEST VARIABLE COSTSa PLANTS/SEED lb. 4.0 2.95 11.80 LIME Ton 0.4 24.00 10.00 FERTILIZER 15-20-20 Cwt. 7.0 8.00 56.00 SIDEDRESSING 26-0-13 Cwt. 1.2 7.70 8.93 INSECTICIDE Est. 24.00 FUNGICIDE Appli. 3.0 9.30 27.90 NEMATICIDE 0.00 HERBICIDE Est. 10.00 MACHINERY Hourly 3.0 4.00 12.00 LABOR Hourly 3.5 3.50 12.25 IRRIGATION Appli. 3.0 10.00 30.00 INTEREST ON OPER. CAP. (202.88) Annually 0.5 .12 12.17 TOTAL PRE-HARVEST VARIABLE COSTS 215.05 PRE-HARVEST FIXED COSTS MACHINERY Hourly 3.0 6.00 18.00 IRRIGATION Acre 1.0 35.00 35.00 LAND 25.00 TOTAL PRE-HARVEST FIXED COSTS 78.00 TOTAL PRE-HARVEST COSTS 293.05 HARVEST AND MARKETING COSTS PICKING AND HAULING Dozen 300 .50 150.00 GRADING AND PACKING Dozen 300 1.00 300.00 CONTAINER Dozen 300 2.00 600.00 MARKETING Dozen 300 1.00 300.00 TOTAL HARVEST AND MARKETING COSTS 1,350.00 TOTAL ESTIMATED PRODUCTION COSTS PER ACRE (5.48/carton) 1,643.05 ESTIMATED GROSS INCOME/ACREb (6.82/carton) 9 -nA n ESTIMATED NET INCOME/ACRE 402.95 production costs were adapted for the Suwannee Valley Area from Circular 473 "Growing Quality Vegetables in Florida," University of Florida and "1985 Vegetable Enterprise Cost Analysis," University of Georgia. Estimated income is based on the Thomasville, Ga. Market average for 1984 and 1985. -- ----- ---- SOURCES OF INFORMATION Annon. 1984. Regional farmer's market survey. Suwannee County Chamber of Commerce Agribusiness Committee, Live Oak. Brown, T. B., and R. W. Johnson. 1982. Important farmlands of Florida and trends in their use. Proc. Soil and Crop Sci. Soc. of Fla. Vol. 41, p. 18-24. Census of Agriculture, 1982. U. S. Department of Commerce, Bureau of the Census. Vol. 1, Part 9. Degner, R. L. et al. 1985. Evaluation of a multi-vegetable freezing facility for the North Central region. Univ. Fl., IFAS, Gainesville and Quincy. Federal-State Marketing News Service. 1983. California fresh fruit and vegetable shipments. USDA-Ca. Dept. Food and Agric., Sacramento. Federal-State Marketing News Service. 1984. Marketing Florida Vegetables, Summary 1983-84. USDA-Fl. Dept. Agr. and Cons. Ser., Winter Park. Federal-State Marketing News Service. 1984. Marketing California vegetables. USDA-Ca. Dept. Food and Agric., Sacramento. Florida Agriculture in the '80s: Special Issues Committee Reports. 1983. Univ. of Fl.,IFAS, Gainesville. Florida Agriculture in the '80s: Conference Report. 1983. Univ. of Fl., IFAS, Gainesville. Flrida Agriculture in the '80s: Support Commitees: Assessment and Analysis. 1983. Univ. of Fl., IFAS, Gainesville. Florida Crop and Livestock Reporting Service. 1985. Vegetable Summary, 1984. Fl. Dept. Agri. and Cons. Ser., Orlando. Good, J., .t al. 1980. 1979 Irrigation Survey: State of Florida. Univ. of Fl. IFAS, Gainesville. Luke, D. B., P. J. Rathwell, and W. P. Cook. 1985. South Carolina small farm vegetable budgets. Clemson Univ., Clemson, SC. McMullen, J. L. 1980. McMullen Food Bank, Inc. A Prospectus. Live Oak. Olson, S. M. 1984. Management and cultural techniques for small farm vegetable production. Univ. Fl., IFAS, Quincy. Olson, S. M., and M. A. Eason. 1984. Selected vegetable budgets - North Florida, 1984. Univ. Fl., IFAS, Quincy. Perry, A. F. 1978. Columbia County watermelon shed feasibility study. Fl. Dept. Agri. and Cons. Serv., Tallahassee. Perry, A. F. 1979. The feasibility of locating a state farmer's market in the Pensacola area. Fl. Dept. Agri. and Cons. Serv., Tallahassee. Perry, A. F. 1983. Lafayette County marketing opportunities. Fl. Dept. Agri. and Cons. Serv., Tallahassee. Perry, A. F. 1985. Feasibility of a state farmer's market in North Central Florida and the need for additional community markets. Fl. DePt, Agri. and Cons. Serv., Tallahassee. Perry, A. F. 1985. Determination of crops suitable for production in Walton County. Fl. Dept. Agr. and Cons. Serv., Tallahassee. Rathwell, J. P., and D. B. Luke. 1985. South Carolina vegetable budgets for commercial producers 1985 and 1986. Clemson Univ., Clemson, SC. Stephens, J. M. 1982. Know your minor vegetables. Univ. Fl., IFAS, Gainesville. Taylor, T. G. 1984. Projected costs and returns for 1984-1985 production season. Univ. Fl., IFAS, Gainesville. Thomasville State Farmers Market. 1984. Annual Report. Georgia Dept. of Agri., Atlanta. Thomasville State Farmers Market. 1985. Annual Report. Georgia Dept. of Agri., Atlanta. VanSickle, J. J. __ Computer aided marketing of produce a concept no longer waiting for the future. Univ. Fl., IFAS, Gainesville. Westberry, G. 0., and W. O. Mizelle, Jr. 1984. 1985 Vegetable enterprise costs analysis. Univ. Ga. Coop. Ext. Serv., Athens. William, R. D. 1981. Growing quality vegetables in Florida. Univ. Fl., IFAS, Gainesville. |