![]() ![]() |
![]() |
UFDC Home | Search all Groups | World Studies | Federal Depository Libraries of Florida & the Caribbean | Vendor Digitized Files | Internet Archive | | Help |
Material Information
Subjects
Notes
Record Information
Related Items
|
Full Text |
Q9Z A\/W
laL. ( I-) "I I AT ST Crop Reporting Board -r~ Released: March 3:00 P.M. asu - ^ Economics, Statistics, & Cooperatives Service pP. I. * ' . Ir~;us US. Department of Agriculture Washington, D.C 20250 -PERCENT MORE POTATO STOCKS ON MARCH 1979 An the fall lier and estimated 129 million cwt producing areas 13 percent more on March potatoes 1979. Th for all s was 6 us pe es were recent ab( 1977. in storage ove a year ear- The regional 111ion cwt. 1977. year. above Stocks Stocks yea last percent from breakdown storage, down in Maine amounted in the eight Cent r. The eiaht Wes 1978 due mo as follows: The 10 percent from a ral tern stly seven year 12.3 million cwt States totaled 2 states larger astern earlier but states ., 15 percent 1 5.7 million cwt had 86.4 million cwt. holdings Idaho and Wa have 16.4 percent above ss than last , 16 percent in storage, shington. Disappearance of (excluding USDA' cwt. farms s pota Nevada to div of potatoes ) the 1978 which version that we includes program. re dumped , discarded without grading crop potatoes The total to March diverted 1979 was to March disappearance during grading, and lo due to 185 million cwt. 1979 indcuaes to lives shrinkage tock under the 24.9 million on potato (moisture The quantity of States amounted to 66 potatoes .5 m process 11ion cwt to March percent 1979 than in th last seven major year r I I I I * - - I @ j ! I NOTE: Stocks are defined uses, as the quantity remaining in storage for including shrinkage and waste and other after the date of each report. generally acco Shrinkage and losses all purposes that occur Sales of fall potatoes for all purposes unt for about 90 percent of the total fall production. loss and home use account for the remaining 0 percent. TABLE . FALL POTATOES: AND APRIL PRODUCTION TOTAL STOCKS, , DECEMBER 1, JANUARY 1, FEBRUARY 1 CROPS OF 1968-78 IN THE FALL STATES MARCH 1, _: :TOTAL STOCKS YEAR PRODUCTION FOLLOWING YEAR : DEC 1 JAN 1 FEB 1 MAR 1 APR 1 1,000 CWT 1968 234,832 152,810 130,350 104,995 81,940 1969 252,561 162,800 138,140 111,510 87,620 1970 267,827 175,145 150,030 122,230 96,780 1971 1/ : 266,707 176,390 151,435 124,375 98,485 1972 2/ : 249,320 158,565 134,420 107,310 83,380 58,250 1973 254,379 157,837 133,665 106,615 81,165 55,870 1974 289,342 187,935 163,095 133,425 104,116 75,905 1975 278,391 185,965 159,140 131,685 104,050 71,640 1976 307,427 201,980 174,775 143,925 114,140 81,875 1977 307,064 206,690 178,205 149,690 120,970 89,215 1978 : 318,702 218,685 190,480 159,141 128,524 1/ BEGINNING WITH 1971, LATE SUMMER PRODUCTION FOR N Y-L I, WIS AND WASH HAS BEEN CLASSIFIED AS FALL. 2/ APR 1 STOCKS EFFECTIVE WITH 1972 CROP YEAR. TABLE 2. POTATOES USED FOR PROCESSING 1/, SEVEN STATES 1977 AND 1978 CROP STATE STORAGE TO TO TO TO TO STORAGE : SEASON : DEC 1 JAN 1 FEB 1 MAR 1 APR : SEASON :--1.000 CWT IDAHO AND MALHEUR CO., OREG MAINE 2/ WASH AND OTHER AREAS, OREG OTHER STATES 3 TOTAL 1977-78 1978-79 1977-78 1978-79 1977-78 1978-79 1977-78 1978-79 1977-78 1978-79 16,761 15.660 4,185 3,670 17,745 18.060 36,846 35.323 47,507 45,595 5,405 4,420 58,570 56,045 39.070 4,980 4,390 30.280 6,230 5,290 70,283 66,515 82,695 61.261 8,040 44,460 9,855 123.616 1/ TOTAL QUANTITY RECEIVED AND. USED FOR PROCESSING REGARDLESS OF THE STAT IN WHICH THE POTATOES WERE PRODUCED. DOES NOT INCLUDE QUANTITIES USED FOR POTATO CHIPS IN MAINE, MICH OR MINN. 2/ INCLUDES MAINE GROWN POTATOES ONLY. 3/ MICH, MINN AND N DAK. TABLE 3. POTATOES: HELD BY GROWERS, PROCESSORS PRODUCTION AND TOTAL STOCKS OF FALL POTATOES AND LOCAL DEALERS ON MARCH 1, 1978 AND MARCH 1, CROP OF 1977 CROP OF 1978 : TOTAL :MIAR 1 STOCKS : TOTAL I : MAR 1 STOCKS STATE PRODUCTION STOCKS : AS % OF PRODUCTION: STOCKS : AS % OF : MAR 1. 1978 : PRODUCTION : : MAR 1. 1979 : PRODUCTION 1,000 CWT PERCENT 1,000 CWT PERCENT CALIF 5,950 1,700 29 6,055 1,880 31 COLO 9,490 3,400 36 9,750 3,050 31 CONN 2/ 2/ 2/ 2/ IDAHO 88,200 46,Q00 53 96,980 50,000 52 IND : 1,128 75 7 936 55 6 MAINE 28,320 14,400 51 26,180 12,300 47 MASS 888 105 12 810 145 18 MICH : 8,800 2,400 27 8,670 3,000 35 MINN 12,960 5,700 44 14,910 7,600 51 MONT 2,016 1,770 88 2,088 1,750 84 NEBR : 1,440 550 38 1,680 750 45 NH 1/ : 2/ 2/ N Y L I : 7,T82 00 11 6,175 600 10 UPSTATE 5,356 1,200 22 6,500 1,200 18 N DAK 21,600 8,800 41 22,400 9,900 44 OHIO 2,744 330 12 2,215 260 12 OREG 25,550 10,800 42 28,488 9,900 35 PA 6,375 1,600 25 6,250 2,150 34 RI : 2/ 2/ 2/ 2/ S DAK 1,062 3b5 29 1,Tg90 T80 15 UTAH 1,416 285 20 1,127 280 25 VT 2/ 2/ 2/ 2/ WASH 50,00 15,r00 31 50,85 19,200 38 WIS 18,038 4,000 22 17,325 4,000 23 WYO 1,474 220 15 1,360 190 14 OTH STS 1,715W 130 8 1,488 34 2 23 STATE TOTAL 3/ 302,304 120,970 40 313,262 128,524 41 I/ ESTIMATES DISCONTINUED AFTER 1977 CROP. 2/ INCLUDED IN "OTHER STATES". 3/ EXCLUDING UEV FOR WHICH NO STOCKS ESTIMATES ARE MADE. NEV 1977 PRODUCTION 4,760,000 CWT AND 1978 PRODUCTION 5,440,000 CWT. To assist use Mean Square Error" puted by percent period. statement final en those in expression of the fin The square ts can be i d of season fluencing 1 rs in evaluating the reliabili , a statistical measure based g the deviations between the M al estimate and averaging the e m n r root ade c esti recent of this oncerning mate, ass years' p average be expected I uming that rel iminary ty of the March 1i 1979 p on past performance, has arch 1 preliminary estima squared percentage deviat statistically the "Root s in the current prelimin ors affecting this year's mates. otato stocks been calculate te and the fi ions for the Mean Square E ary estimate estimate are estimates, the "Root ed. This is com- nal estimate as a 1959-78 twenty-year rror". Probability relative to the not different from The "Root Mean Square Error" for the March 1, 1979 potato stocks estimate:is 3.8 percent. This means that chances are 2 out of 3 that the current estimate of 129 million hundredweight will not be above or below the final estimate by more than 3.8 percent or approximately 4.88 million hundredweight. Chances are 9 out of 10 (90 percent confidence level) that the difference will not exceed 6.6 percent or approxi- mately 8.48 million hundredweight. During the past 10 years, the difference between the March 1 preliminary and the final estimate aver- aged 2.9 million hundredweight. The largest deviation was 6.3 million hundredweight and the smallest was .3 million hundredweight. The preliminary March 1 estimate was below the final estimate 9 times and above the final estimate once during the past 10 years. UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA 1II11111 llI IIIIIIIl 3 1262 08862 1080 POTATO STOCKS QUALITY SURVEY MINNESOTA AND NORTH DAKOTA (RED RIVER VALLEY) The potato stocks quality information contained in this report is based on a survey conducted by the Economics, Statistics, and Cooperatives Service in the Red River Valley of North Dakota and Minnesota. Sample bags.of potatoes selected on a random basis issued each month during the 1978-79 storage season for potatoes at the time of removal from storage. Association, samples were selected only for process n were placed in storage at harvest time. Reports are showing the cumulative average grade and weight loss At the request of the Red River Valley Potato Growers sing potatoes. recovered before March 1, 1979 continue t slightly higher and the after storage qual period a year ago. For Russet varieties, however, a vest and after storage potatoes compared with March 1 for white varieties while in storage was only 8 point decline a year earlier. Russet samples removed from 1's versus a 10 point decline last March 1. The percent of white varieties graded storage culls, at the percent of Rus for after storage March 1. 1978 for 11 percent set culls potatoes. white var "i S were points r o indicate that the quality of white varieties at ity was significantly higher than for the comparable education in quality was reflected for both at har- 1978. The decline in No. 1 grade (including B's) i as of March 1, 1979 compared with a 12 point storage to date as culls at harv below March 1, at harvest was below the comparab The total weight loss while in s eties but 1 point lower than a ye The cooperation of the many potato growers greatly appreciated. est was 1978. indicate a same as Samples date 1 storage wa recov ast season s 1 point ar ago for Russets and storage operators who ass 14 point decline in No. a year ago, but after ered to date indicate that n but was 2 points higher higher this year than ted on this project is POTATO STOCKS QUALITY SURVEY, RED RIVER VALLEY, AVERAGE GRADE OF POTATOES 1978-79 SNO. 1 INCLUDING B'S : AT : AFTER HARVEST : STORAGE CULLS : AT : HARVEST : AFTER : STORAGE : AT : HARVEST PERCENT : AFTER : STORAGE : AT HARVEST S 1/ : AFTER STORAGE : WEIGHT * LOSS"" SAMPLES RECOVERED BEFORE MARCH 1979 2/ WHITE RUSSET SAMPLES RECOVERED BEFORE MARCH 1978 2/ WHITE RUSSET ALL SAMPLES 1977-78 STORAGE SEASON-FINAL WHITE RUSSET I/ NO. 1 B'S ARE POTATOES THAT MEET THE U S NO. I GRADE BUT DO NOT MEET MINIMUM AREA: RED AND WHITE VARIETIES 1 2 INCHES IN DIAMETER AND RUSSET VARIETIES DIAMETER OR LESS THAN 4 OUNCES. 2/ MATCHED SAMPLES, QUALITY AT HARVEST COMPARED WITH QUALITY AFTER STORAGE. SIZE STANDARDS FOR THE - UNDER 2 INCHES IN harvest was t |