![]() ![]() |
![]() |
UFDC Home | Search all Groups | World Studies | Federal Depository Libraries of Florida & the Caribbean | Vendor Digitized Files | Internet Archive | | Help |
Material Information
Subjects
Notes
Record Information
Related Items
|
Full Text |
C S.S-wTTrA- 9 9 C)
[A Til U.S. Department of Commerce BUREAU OF THE CENSUS BUREAU OF DOMESTIC BUSINESS DEVELOPMENT The statistics in this publication are based on a survey CURRENT INDUSTRIAL REPORTS anium Ingot, Mill Products, and Castings SEPTEMBER 1979 ITA-991 (79)-9 formerly DIB-991 Issued December 1979 ose reports were not received in time for tabu. manufactures and represent total U.S. shipments of titanium t t35 more complete description of this survey appears ingot, mill products, and castings. Estimates are included for on page 4. THIS REPORT INCLUDES DATA COMPARING DOMESTIC OUTPUT, EXPORTS, AND IMPORTS TITANIUM INGOT AND MILL PRODUCTS. 1974 TO 1979 (in Thousands of Pounds) Producilan of Ingot 1974 1975 1976 1977 1978 1979 Address inquiries concerning these figures to the US. Department of Commerce, Industry and Trade Administration, Bureau of Domestic Business Development, Materials Division, Washington, D.C. 20230, or to the Bureau of the Census, Industry Division, Washington. D.C. 20233, or call Stephen M. Pope, (301) 763-7476. For sale by the Subscriber Services Section (Publications), Bureau of the Census, Washington, D.C. 20233, or any U.S. Department of Commerce district office. Postage stamps not acceptable: currency submitted at sender's risk. Remittances from Ioreian countries must be by international money order or by a draft on a U.S. bank. Price 25 cents per copy, $3 25 per year. N.o Shipmnlent of Mil Produces Table 1. TITANIUM INGOT, MILL PRODUCTS, AND CASTINGS: 1977 To 1979 (Thousands of pounds) Ingot MIIl Month and year products CaItlne. Production Connumpt Ion Ending net shipment, stocks shipmentsI 1979 September...................................... 6,279 6,84i -.60' j,5-.. 0. August........................................ 6,359 5,.-. -.*. j, 7 .' 9.8 July............................................. 5,032 4,o88 31.- jlu 2. June............................................ 6,579 5,856 4,401 *..,f 9 27.8 May............................................... 6,095 5,449 4,367 3,573 25.1 April.......................................... 5,345 5,577 4,197 3,266 2..9 March........................................... 6,983 6,349 4,368 3,571 16.5 February........................................ 5,858 5,447 3,947 3,170 34.9 January......................................... 6,582 6,767 4,039 3,464 30.3 1978 December ......................................... 5,784 5,532 4,310 3,207 25.5 November ......................................... 5,546 5,717 3,886 3,160 28.3 October......................................... 6,141 6,740 4,654 3,279 25.5 September....................................... 5,660 5,305 5,122 3,474 37.. August ........................................... 6,336 4,956 5,452 2,603 29.9 July............................................. 4,004 3,903 3,685 1,866 33.4 June .............................................. 5,792 5,360 4,186 3,534 28.6 May............................................. 5,224 4,985 4,111 2,847 32.0 April........................................... 5,138 5,272 4,266 2,560 25.2 March........................................... 5,985 5,443 4,079 3,623 31.9 February ......................................... 4,024 4,585 3,480 2,743 35.2 January......................................... 4,388 4,530 3,973 2,401 26.5 1977 December........................................ 4,441 4,276 3,795 2,847 28.7 November........................................ 3,897 4,081 3,863 2,473 28.4 October......................................... 4,439 4,822 3,713 2,333 25.3 September....................................... 5,652 4,812 4,318 2,778 19.1 August.......................................... 4,016 3,836 3,722 1,965 27.4 'See table 2 for more detailed data. Table 2. NET SHIPMENTS OF TITANIUM MILL PRODUCTS (Thousands of pounds) September August September 1979 1979 1978 Total........................ ........... 3,544 r3,702 3,474 Sheet and strip................................. 691 846 71 Plate ............................................ Forging and extrusion billet..................... 1,040 r1,548 1,600 Rod and bar...................................... 947 516 604 Fastener stock and wire.......................... 240 174 160 Extrusions (other than tubing)................... Pipe and tubing ....................... ......... 626 618 392 Other............................................ rRevised by 5 percent or more from previously published figures. Table 3. NiT SHIPMENTS, EXPORTS, IM iRTiS, AND APPARENT CONSUMPTION OF TITANIUM MILL PRODUCTS: 1970 TO 1979 IQuantity in thousand: of pounds: value in thou'3ndT of dollar?) Exports of domestic Percent Imports for Percent Manuric- rerchandiisel 2 exports to consumption' 4 Calculated Apparent imports turer net m anufac- import consump- prt Month or shipments, Value at Estimated turers' net duty, tion, 6 capparnt (quantityl Quantity t producers' shipments Quantity Value5 (value) (quantity) (qantiy) S value3 (quantity) (uatt 1979 September .................... 3J,s-. (NA) (NA) (NA) (NA) (NA) (NA) (NA) (NA) (NA) August....................... 3,702 165 1,829 1,743 4 153 701 104 3,690 4 July.................... .... 3,149 145 2,092 1,994 5 80 799 127 3,084 3 June......................... 4,029 222 2,269 2,162 5 102 673 119 3,909 3 May ......................... 3,573 281 2,693 2,566 8 210 1,087 185 3,502 6 April.................. .......... 3,266 65 873 831 2 229 1,048 186 3,430 7 March ...................... 3,571 155 1,851 1,763 4 234 1,187 208 3,650 6 February ..................... 3,170 66 817 778 2 90 375 62 3,194 3 January...................... 3,464 49 605 576 1 124 656 102 3,539 4 1978 December.... ............... 3,207 94 817 778 3 125 526 94 3,238 4 November..................... 3,160 109 1,089 1,038 3 83 351 62 3,134 3 October..................... .. 3,279 62 586 558 2 237 804 137 3,454 7 September..................... 3,474 82 799 761 2 161 658 117 3,553 5 August....................... 2,603 78 685 653 3 154 744 118 2,679 6 July....................... 1,866 116 987 940 6 256 1,063 188 2,006 13 June........................ 3,534 152 1,072 1,021 4 207 867 153 3,589 6 May........................... 2,847 217 1,786 1,702 8 214 962 164 2,844 8 April........................ 2,560 74 630 600 3 191 817 144 2,677 7 March....................... 3,623 242 1,943 1,851 7 64 207 38 3,445 2 February.............. .... 2,743 73 661 630 3 282 1,053 176 2,952 10 January...................... 2,401 80 713 679 3 276 1,145 200 2,597 11 1978, total .................. 35,129 1,379 11,768 11,213 4 2,250 9,197 1,591 36,000 6 1977, total.................. 30,932 1,368 11,821 11,263 4 708 2,958 483 30,272 2 1976. total .................. 28,995 1,604 12,970 12,358 6 647 2,939 510 28,038 2 1975, total.................. 31,256 2,445 20,760 19,840 8 417 2,221 400 29,228 1 1976, total.................. 34,886 2,233 17,197 16,485 6 415 1,659 297 33,068 1 1973, toral.................. 29,057 954 7,099 6,826 3 366 918 148 28,469 1 1972, total .................. 25,254 609 4,285 4,133 2 423 1,087 190 25,068 2 1971. corta. ....... ........ 22,481 417 3,016 2,909 2 548 1,354 197 22,612 2 1970, total......... ........ 28,960 560 3,962 3,821 2 1,104 2,976 519 24,504 4 (NA) Not available. 'See r ole 4 for comparison of Standard Industrial Classification (SIC) codes, export (Schedule B) codes, and import (TSUSA) codes. 5Source: Bureau of the Census Report FT-410, U.S. Exports, Commodity by Country. 3These values were derived by use of adjustment factors to exclude freight insurance, and other charges incurred in moving goods to the port of export. This adjustment is made to convert the values to an approximation of the producers' value of exported goods. Current adjustment factors are based on data for 1976 which are published in "Origin of Exports of Manufacturing Establishments" M76(AS)-8, appendix A. Comparable adjustment factor- for earlier years are based on similar factors developed for 1971 and 1972. The adjustment factor for this report is .953. 'Source Bureau of the Census Report IM 145-X, U.S. Imports for Consumption and General Imports. 5Beginning with 1978 the dollar value represents the c.i.f. (cost, insurance, and freight) value at the first port of entry in the United States plus U.S. Import duties. 'Apparent consumption is derived by subtracting exports from the total of net shipments plus imports. Table 4. COMPARISON OF STANDARD INDUSTRIAL CLASSIFICATION (SIC) CODES, EXPORT (SCHEDULE B) CODES, AND IMPORT (TSUSA) CODES 1979 1979 1979 1979 SIC SIC code description Export code Export code description Import code Import code description product (Schedule B) (TSUSA) code 33562 74 Forging and extrusion billet....... Wrought titanium metal, including Wrought titanium metal, including t 630.6570 alloys (excludes sponge, ingots, 629.2000 alloys (excludes waste and scrap 33562 79 Other (sheet, plate, tubing, bar, billets, blooms, sheet bars, and unwrought metal) etc.).............................. slabs, waste and scrap) DESCRIPTION OF SURVEY Scope of Survey-This survey covers firms engaged in manufacturing titanium ingot and mill products, including castings. Sampling Description-The statistics in this publication were collected on the Bureau of Domestic Business Development Form ITA-991,iTitanium Metal. The mailing panel for this survey includes all known titanium ingot, mill product, and castings producers. Survey Error-Figures for the current month include esti- mates for respondents whose reports were not received in time for tabulation. Such missing figures are "imputed" from month-to-month movements shown by reporting firms and are generally limited to a maximum of 10 percent for any one item. Individual items with imputation rates greater than 10 percent are footnoted. The imputation rate is not an explicit indicator of the potential error in published figures due to nonresponse, because the actual monthly movements for nonrespondents may or may not closely agree with the imputed movements. The probable range of difference between the actual and imputed figures is unknown. The degree of uncertainty regarding the accuracy of the data, however, increases as the percentage of imputation increases. Figures with imputation rates above 10 percent should be used with caution. Revision to Previous Period Data-Statistics for previous months may be revised due to receipt of corrected data from respondents, including late reports for which imputations were previously made as described above, and other corrections. Figures which have been revised by more than 5 percent from previously published figures are indicated by footnotes. Seasonal Adjustment-The data are not adjusted for seasonal variation or number of working days. EXPLANATION OF TERMS Net Shipments-Derived by subtracting the sum of pro- ducers' receipts of each mill shape from the industry's gross shipments of that shape. Gross Shipments-Include the quantities of mill shapes con- sumed in rolling mills in the production of fabricated products such as forgings, etc. Also includes the quantities of mill shapes shipped between producers. COMPARISON OF EXPORT, IMPORT, AND DOMESTIC OUTPUT DATA The Standard Industrial Classification (SIC) system used for domestic output and the statistical export and import com- modity classifications were developed independently and are based on somewhat differing systems of classification. This results in considerable difficulty in comparing the three types of data for many commodity areas. The domestic output classifi- cation is based on type of industry; whereas, the export and import classification system is more materials oriented. Aside from the differences in the basic commodity classifications, there are additional problems involving import data, since there are a substantial number of imported commodities which are not produced in the United States or which are produced only in very small quantities and which, therefore, have no com- parable domestic output classification. The relationships shown in this report should be considered only as approximations. since, in addition to those mentioned above, there are also the following problems affecting the comparability of the three sets of data: a. Valuation-There are different methods of valuation for the three types of data. Domestic Output-Valued at the point of production. It includes the net sales price, f.o.b. plant, after discounts and allowances, exclusive of freight charges and excise taxes. Exports-Valued at the point of exportation. It includes the selling price, or cost if not sold, and inland freight, insurance, and other charges to the export point. Estimated producers' values of exports have also been devel- oped. These values more closely approximate the values re- ported for domestic output because they exclude freight, in- surance and other charges applied from the producing plant to the export point Imports-Valued at the first port of entry in the United States. It includes c.i.f. (cost, insurance, and freight), duty, and other charges to the import point. b. Duplication in Quantity and Value of Output-Because producers' shipments of some commodities may be used as materials for incorporation into other commodities, combina- tions of data for such commodities may contain a certain amount of duplication. Thus, percentages of exports to output or imports to apparent consumption (output plus imports minus exports) at four-digit or broader levels may be understated. Where duplication is known to be substantial, the output data are appropriately noted in the table. c. Low-Valued Export and Import Transactions-Commodity information is not shown for individual imports valued under $251. For exports, commodity information is not reported for shipments individually valued under $251 effective October 1969 and for shipments valued under $100 prior to October 1969. This is believed to have only negligible effect on the statistics for most commodities. d. Manufacturers' Shipments, Not Specified by Kind-The value of manufacturers' shipments at the four-digit industry level often includes a small amount which is not distributed among the individual five-digit product classes. Export and import percentages at the more detailed levels might, therefore, be slightly overstated. e. Time Lag Between Output and Exports-There will be a lag between the time a commodity is produced or shipped by the producer and the time it is actually exported, especially when intermediaries (wholesalers, exporters, etc.) are involved. Ordinarily, this type of discrepancy is insignificant in annual figures. f. "Direct" vs "Total" Commodity Export and Imports- Export and import data do not include materials which are incorporated into other more finished products and exported or imported in finished form. Thus, by showing only direct exports and imports, the relation of exports to output and imports to apparent consumption for intermediate products is considerably understated. g. Used Commodities-With a few exceptions, used or rebuilt commodities are classified in the same import or export codes as is new merchandise. Percentages are thus overstated to the extent that used or rebuilt products are significant in trade. RELATED REPORTS An annual Current Industrial Report is published in this series. The annual report summarizes monthly figures and incorporates all known revisions in the series for both current and previous year, thus providing a single reference copy to replace the monthly publications. This annual summary pro- vides additional information on the history of this survey. The Bureau of the Census also publishes reports on related products as follows: Series Frequency Title Current Industrial Reports M3.1 Monthly Manufacturers' Shipments, Inven- tories, and Orders M33-2 Monthly Aluminum Ingot and Mill Products Series MA-33G MA-33B M33A M33E Frequency Annually Annually Monthly Monthly Foreign Trade Reports FT-410 Monthly IM 145-X Monthly Title Magnesium Mill Products Steel Mill Products Iron-and Steel Castings Nonferrous Castings U.S. Exports-Schedule B-Com- modity by Country U.S. Imports for Consumption and General Imports CONTACT FOR DATA USERS Subject Area Current Industrial Report ITA-991 formerly DIB-991 Foreign Trade publications Bureau of Domestic Business Development To order a Census Bureau publication To order Census Bureau microfiche Contact Stephen M. Pope Juanita Noone James Manion Daisy Williams Phone Number (301) 763-7476 (301) 763-5140 (202) 377-2692 (301) 763-7472 Maria Brown (301) 763-5511 Digitized by the Internet Archive in 2011 with funding from University of Florida, George A. Smathers Libraries with support from LYRASIS and the Sloan Foundation http://www.archive.org/details/currentindustria91979unit CURRENT INDUSTRIAL REPORTS Keep up to date with Bureau of the Census data covering over 5,000 products representing 40% of all manufacturing in the United States! The Bureau of the Census issues a continuing series of more than 100 monthly, quarterly, and annual reports on industrial production...inventories... and orders. Broad categories listed in the Current Industrial Series include: All Manufacturing Industries Manufacturers' Shipments, Inven- tories, and Orders Manufacturers' Export Sales and Orders Shipments of Defense -Oriented Industries Processed Foods Textile Mill Products Apparel and Leather Lumber, Furniture, and Paper Products Chemicals, Rubber, and Plastics Stone, Clay, and Glass Products Primary Metals Intermediate Metal Products Machinery and Equipment For further information on all reports in- cluded in these categories, frequency of reports, subscription prices, and a publica- rtons order form, free of charge, write to the Subscriber Services Section IPublicarions), Bureau of the Census. Washingron. D.C. 20233 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE BUREAU OF THE CENSUS U.S. Department of Commerce BUREAU OF THE CENSUS Washington. D.C. 20233 Official Business Penalty tor Private Use. S300 UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA SILHIii HIIIIIIiiUIIIi 3 1262 08589 2304 COM-202 L First Class Mail |