|
Citation |
- Permanent Link:
- http://ufdc.ufl.edu/AA00002118/00001
Material Information
- Title:
- Thermodynamic aspects of gas-phase electron attachment to transition metal tris (Beta-diketonate) complexes
- Creator:
- Sharpe, Paul, 1958-
- Publication Date:
- 1990
- Language:
- English
- Physical Description:
- vi, 139 leaves : ill. ; 29 cm.
Subjects
- Subjects / Keywords:
- Anions ( jstor )
Electron attachment ( jstor ) Electronics ( jstor ) Electrons ( jstor ) Energy value ( jstor ) Enthalpy ( jstor ) Entropy ( jstor ) Ions ( jstor ) Ligands ( jstor ) Solvation ( jstor ) Chemistry thesis Ph. D Complex compounds ( lcsh ) Dissertations, Academic -- Chemistry -- UF Ketones ( lcsh ) Thermochemistry ( lcsh ) Transition metal compounds ( lcsh )
Notes
- Thesis:
- Thesis (Ph. D.)--University of Florida, 1990.
- Bibliography:
- Includes bibliographical references (leaves 130-138).
- General Note:
- Typescript.
- General Note:
- Vita.
- Statement of Responsibility:
- by Paul Sharpe.
Record Information
- Source Institution:
- University of Florida
- Holding Location:
- University of Florida
- Rights Management:
- Copyright [name of dissertation author]. Permission granted to the University of Florida to digitize, archive and distribute this item for non-profit research and educational purposes. Any reuse of this item in excess of fair use or other copyright exemptions requires permission of the copyright holder.
- Resource Identifier:
- 024458978 ( ALEPH )
23725757 ( OCLC ) AHP3867 ( NOTIS )
|
Downloads |
This item has the following downloads:
|
Full Text |
THERMODYNAMIC ASPECTS OF GAS-PHASE ELECTRON
TO TRANSITION METAL TRIS(BETA-DIKETONATE)
By
PAUL SHARPE
-" a>
ATTACHMENT
COMPLEXES
A DISSERTATION PRESENTED TO THE GRADUATE SCHOOL
OF THE UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA IN PARTIAL
FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS
FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY
UNIVERSITY
OF FLORIDA
1990
^- -.w
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
First
I must
thank my research director
Dr. David E.
Richardson
for his
understanding,
guidance
and support
throughout my graduate
career.
Dr. John R.
Eyler
and Dr.
Cliff Watson
also deserve
considerable
recognition
for their many
contributions
useful
discussions,
especially on
help with
the instrumentation.
No dissertation would be complete without
acknowledging
all the
friends
loved-ones
for their
support.
Foremost
in my mind
in this
regard
Stephanie Weinstock,
whose
love
understanding
have been
constant
source of
encouragement
over the
last
two years.
Also,
would
like
to thank my mother,
and my
late
father whom
know would
have been
proud.
Finally,
at the
will
University of
always
Florida
remember my
colleagues
especially Matt,
Casey,
in Graduate
Mike
School
T.M.
greatly
enhanced the enjoyment
of graduate
school
at Florida.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
pa*e
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS........................................-.-...........-.ii
CHAPTERS
INTRODUCTION.
Overview of Research.
Introduction to Metal
Properties a
Description
EXPERIMENTAL
B-Diketonate C complexes.
G-Dn^ike'/^toateo Complexes.va
nd Applications of Metal
of the FTICR Technique..
PROCEDURES
B-Diketoi
. .. ..1
. .8
nates .......12
............. 18
AND RESULTS
Preparation of
Cnmle ets a
Tris(hexafluoroacetylacetonate)
omphjJa x ...... ............................~
Preparation of Tris(acetylacetonate) Complexes.
Preparation of Ruthenium Tris(B-Diketonates)...
Organic Compounds..............................
Electron Attachment Studies....................
Gas-Phase Spectrophotometry of Cr(hfac)3.......
. .........23
...........25
S .25
...........26
. ..... .. .26
S.......... .37
TERMINOLOGY AND CONVENTIONS
ION THERMOCHEMISTRY......
USED
Introduction.....................
Electron Affinities and Adiabatic
Potentials.....................
Stationary and Thermal Electron C
IN GAS-PHASE
... .. ... .
.... .... ..* ...
...........
Ionization
conventions.
.. ... 39
.. ...........40
INTRAMOLECULAR ENTROPY CHANGES FOR REDOX COUPLES
INVOLVING COMPLEX METAL IONS...........................48
Introduction.......
Statist
of Ga
Redox
Compari
Chang
Metal
The Rel
of Ga
ical
Mechanics Applied
s-Phase
Couple
son of
es for
Comple
ationsh
s-Phase
Intr
s Inv
Solut
Some
xes..
ip Be
Elec
to the Determination
molecular Entropy Changes for
olving Complex Metal Ions........
ion-Phase and Gas-Phase Entropy
Redox Couples Involving Octahedral
....
twee
tron
Mthfae1.- Comnleres...
. .51
.... ..-............................72
n The Free Energy and Enthalpy
Attachment to M(acac)3 and
- a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a -' 80
ABSTRACT......................... .... .. .......... .... *-*.*
.........................48
METAL-LIGAND BOND ENERGIES AND SALVATION ENERGIES
GAS-PHASE TRANSITION METAL TRIS(ACETYLACETONATE
COMPLEXES AND THEIR ANIONS.....................
)
...... ..
Introduction..............................................84
Electron Attachment Energy Relationships.................85
Homolytic and Heterolytic M-0 Bond Enthalpies in
M(acac)3(g) Complexes and M(acac)3"(g) Ions.............90
Relative Solvation Energies of M(acac)3(g)
and M(acac)3" (g)".*....................................99
Relative Solvation Energies of Ru(tfac)3(g) and
Ru(hfac)3 and Their Negative Ions......................108
Conclusions..............................................111
INTERPRETATION OF THE TRENDS ON THE ELECTRON ATTACHMENT
FREE ENERGIES OF THE TRIS(ACETYLACETONATE) AND
TRIS(HEXAFLUOROACETYLACETONATE) COMPLEXES OF THE
METALS Ti-Co USING THE SIMPLE LIGAND FIELD MODEL.......
Introduction.....................................
Thermochemical Relationships and Periodic Trends.
Conclusions......................................
........113
........114
S. ..128
REFERENCES.
BIOGRAPHICAL SKETCH..................................................
Abstract
of Dissertation
of the University
Requirements
of Florida
Presented
to the Graduate
in Partial
for the Degree of
Doctor
Fulfillment
School
of the
of Philosophy
THERMODYNAMIC ASPECTS OF GAS-PHASE ELECTRON
TO TRANSITION
METAL
TRIS
(BETA-DIKETONATE)
ATTACHMENT
COMPLEXES
Paul S
August
harpe
1990
Chairman:
Major
David E
Department:
Estimations
Richardson,
Chemistry
of the free
Ph.D.
energies
gas-phase electron
attachment
to several
transition metal
tris(8
-diketonate)
complexes
at 350 K are
reported.
compounds
studied
are the tris(acetylacetonate)
complexes
(M(acac)3)
the tris(hexafluoroacetylacetonate)
complexes
M(hfac)3
of the
data
series
for the
of first
row transition metals
ruthenium complexes
Ru(acac)3,'
= Ga Co.
Ru(tfac)3
In addition,
and Ru(hfac)3
are
reported,
first
where
tfac
trifluoroacetylacetonate.
reliable estimations
of thermal
gas-phase
This work
electron
represents
attachment
energies
for a class
of coordination
compounds.
Electron
using
attachment
Fourier transform
free energies
ion cyclotron
for the
complexes
resonance mass
were obtained
spectrometry
(FTICR)
to monitor
charge-transfer
bracketing
and equilibrium
reactions
involving parent
negative
ions
trapped
in a mixture
of two gases.
gas mixture consisted of
a metal
complex
an organic
reference
compound,
for which
the electron
attachment
free
energy
is established
Theoretical
intramolecular
entropy
changes
some
redox
couples
involving
coordination
complex
ions
are estimated
and compared,
where
electron
thermochemical
attachment
data
energy
energy
cycles
data are combined
that
lead
with
to estimations
other
of the
changes
in heterolytic M-O bond enthalpies
and solvation
free energies.
The observation
acetylacetonate
of charge-transfer
anions
bracketing
reactions
led to the determination of
involving
heterolytic
homolytic
Published
M-0 bond
estimatio
enthalpies
ns of the
for M(acac)3
absolute
neutrals
potential
of the
their al
standard
onions.
hydrogen
electrode
led to estimations
electron attachment
of the
to the complexes
free energy
in several
for solution-phase
solvents.
For
Ru(acac)3,
single
ion solvation
free energy
is estimated,
result
is discussed
comparison
to a
similar
estimation based on a
dielectric
continuum theoretical model.
results of
this
investigation
serve to
illustrate
relative
importance of
changes
in bond energies
and solvation
energies
that
determine
the magnitude of
redox
couples
involving
reduction
of tris(B-
diketonate)
complexes.
CHAPTER 1
INTRODUCTION
Overview of Research
Many methods
have
been
used
for the determination
of gas-phase
electron attachment
energies
of atoms
and molecules.
These methods
be categorized
into theoretical,
semiempirical
and experimental,
these
various
approaches
have been
reviewed.
1 Although
some
of the
published data on
gas-phase electron
attachment
energies
has been
determined
from
solution-phase
studies
such
as polarography
and reaction
calorimetry,
the majority
experimental methods
that
of the
study
published work
gas-phase
negative
to date
stems
from the
ions directly.
These
methods were actively
developed
during the early
1970s.
Gas-phase
methods
rely
on a ready
source of
ions,
which
is by
far most
easily
accomplished by the
determinations
have
ionization of
been
performed
a gas.
on ions
Hence,
formed
the majority o
from volatile
precursors.
In the case of
metal-containing
compounds,
studies
negative
ions
have been
restricted
to those
formed
from metal
halides,
especially
are
metal
hexafluorides,
all gases or volatile
hexafluorides
have
oxyhalides,
liquids or
received
and carbonyls.
solids.
a great
deal
These
In particular,
of attention.
compounds
transition
It has
long
been
known
that
these
compounds
are the most
highly
oxidizing
compounds
known,
typically
having
electron
affinities
in the
range of
eV to 10 eV.
The majority
of experimental methods
involving
gas-phase
negative
inns
ths
t. l *IJVr- L ]i*si [ I i fl"( i
Is. ewa
k a a -
. a a s2
tn d~tarmi no
the ci orO-rnn
nt-I- nr.hrnonl-
can
4-
energy
an impinging
particle
that
causes
formation
or breakdown
of a negative
ion.
In the atom
impact
method,
beams of
energy
selected
neutral
alkali
atoms
are collided
with
a neutral
target
gas.
translational
energy
dependence of
the alkali
atom beam
is monitored
a function of
the relative
cross
section
for the
formation
of the
parent
anion
of the
target
molecules.
Using
this
method,
Compton
workers
have provided
estimates
for the
electron
affinities
of MoF6,
ReF6,
SeF6,
TeF6
and WF6.
A related method
involves
colliding negative
the negative
endothermic
ions
ions
into
is varied
electron-transfer
a target
gas.
and the threshold
reaction
translational
energy
for the
energy
onset o
is detected by the observation
formation
charge-transfer
transfer.
of product
or may
enthalpy
ions.
ion-molecule
be accompanied by
of formation
atom
of the
reaction may
transfer,
anion
such
of interest
be simple
as proton
can be
determined
from the enthalpies
of formation of
all other
species
involved
in the
reaction,
combined
with
the threshold
value
of the
translational
atomic
energy
and negative
of the negative
ion beams
ion beam.
in these methods
Although
can be
the energy of
controlled
within
a range of
energy of
0.1
, there
are
several
problems
encountered
prominent
in obtaining
are
distribution
accurate electron
sensitivity
of the
of the
translational
attachment
threshold
energies
energies.
energy to
the target
Most
thermal
gas,
weakness
of the
signal
around
the threshold
energy
lack
information on
initial
and final
states
of the neutral
molecules
product
results
ions.
Due to
for electron
the inherent
affinity values
problems
these methods
for transition metal
have
produced
hexafluorides
that
are
in considerable disagreement
For example,
range of
- 1 an~ -nfl
a
- CC 4 n 4-. 1 .. a
- a A~ a -2
A- ~ ~ ~* __ ^ -- _- A- ----A -
co-
the detachment
using photons
an electron
known
from a
energy
negative
generated by
ion,
according to
a laser,
or light
eq 1-1,
source
with monochromator.
+ hv
= AB +e
Photodetachment methods
use a variable
frequency
laser to detach
electron
from the negative
ion AB
threshold
energy
can be
obtained by using
a variety
of physical
methods
that
detect
either the
detached electrons or the
formation
of neutral
molecules
from the
anions
as a function
of photon
flux
and wavelength.
interaction
of the
negative
ions with
the photon
flux
has been
accomplished
in crossed
photon-molecular
beam experiments,
drift
tubes
and in ion traps.
In photoelectron spectroscopy
frequency
of the
photon
source
is fixed and
the energy
spectrum of
the emitted
electrons
is recorded.
For simple molecular
anions,
composed
a few atoms,
the energy
spectrum can be resolved
the detachment process.
into the vi
Determining
brational
transitions
the energy of
accompanying
the ejected
electrons
from the ground
vibrational
states
of the neutral
anion
leads
very
accurate determinations
of the electron
affinity
of molecules.
Using the photoelectron
spectroscopy method,
Lineberger
co-workers
have
determined
the electron
affinities of
several
carbonyl
complexes
Fe and Ni,
which are
in the
range of
0.6 2.4 eV.8'9
A limitation
extending the technique
to high
electron
affinity
compounds
such as
volatile metal
hexafluorides
is that
although
it may
poss
ible
identify
the energy transitions
in the spectra,
producing
a light
source
required wavelength
and flux
impractical
for compounds
such
Since
about
1982,
techniques
in mass
spectrometry that
are
capable
of following
the time
dependence of
ion-molecule
reactions
have
been
used
to determine
the electron
attachment
energies
of polyatomic
molecules.
In these methods
the equilibrium constant
for a gas-phase
charge-transfer
reaction
involving two
neutral
reactants
their
parent
negative
ions
is measured.
These methods
have
therefore been
described
as equilibrium methods.
techniques
in mass
spectrometry
that
have
been
used
for this
purpose
are pulsed
high
pressure mass
spectrometry
(PHPMS)1 0-15
and ion cyclotron
resonance mass
spectrometry
(ICR)
16-19
Electron
attachment
energies
for many
different
organic
compounds
have been
reported,
and values
are
in the
range
of 0.5 3
types
determinations
new
compounds
are reported each
studied
year.
is still
One
of the
expanding
advantages
and many more
of the
equilibrium method
over threshold methods
for determining
electron
attachment
energies
is that
the moleular
ions
formed after
ionization
are cooled
to the
same temperature
as the neutral molecules
from which
they
are
formed,
usually by
a thermalizing
bath
gas.
Electron
attachment
energies
are
therefore obtained
a definite
temperature
be combined with other
attachment
energies
thermochemical
in condensed-phases.
data,
especially
For example,
many
electron
of the
organic
compounds
studied
exhibit
reversible electrochemical
behavior
this
has led to estimates
of the
change
in solvation
energy
solution
phase reduction of
these compounds
14,15,20
A relatively
recent
technique
in mass
spectrometry that
also
capable of
monitoring the
time dependence of
ion-molecule
reactions
versatile
mass
spectrometry
powerful
(FTICR).
Fourier
transform
An important
ion cyclotron
difference
resonance
between FTICR
-A- ~-. -A.- -t. -~
. A
reactions
research
of metal
considers
containing
ion-molecule
compounds.
processes
21-43
Much
of the
involving metal
published
containing
ions
(mostly derived
from organometallic
precursors)
or bare metal
ions
(produced
by techniques
such
as laser
vaporization
of metal
targets)
The bulk of
this work has
centered
on the reactions
of bare metal
ions or
highly
coordinatively unsaturated metal
ions
with
bonds
21-34
Relatively
little
attention
has been
given,
however,
coordinatively
saturated metal
complexes
with non-carbon
donor
ligands,
such
as coordination
complexes
There were two principal
objectives of
the present
work.
first
was
to determine
the free energies of
thermal
electron
attachment
for a series
of coordination
complexes by using the
FTICR
technique,
thereby
extending the established
the determination
of free energies
charge-transfer
of electron at
equilibrium method
tachment
coordination
complexes.
The compounds
studied
in the
present
work were
tris(acetylacetonate)
(M(acac)3)
tris(hexafluoroacetylacetonate)
(M(hfac
complexes
complexes
Ru(acac)3,
of the series of metals M
Ru(hfac)3
and Ru(tfac)3
= Sc
were
- Co and
also
included
(where
tfac
= trifluoroacetylacetonate).
These
complexes
are
pseudo-octahedral
tris
chelate
coordination
complexes
in which
ligands bind
to metal
centers with
oxygen
atom donors.
Estimates
of the
free energies
electron
attachment
for these complexes
were obtained
in the
present
work,
this
represents
the first
reliable determination
of the gas-
phase electron attachment
energies
of coordination
complexes
under
thermal
conditions.
second
objective was
to determine
the changes
average
heterolytic metal-oxygen
(M-O)
bond
energies
that
occur
during
-phase
i
obtained
incorporating the electron
attachment
free
energy
data
complexes
into energy
cycles35
that
relate
the energy
for this
process
to the energy
for electron
attachment
to the
free metal
ions
the coordinated
heterolytic
attachment
bond
ions
in solution.
enthalpies
to the complex
To obtain
a value of
change
the entropy
change
average M-O
for electron
required.
Estimates
of entropies
could
be obtained,
in principle,
determining the
temperature dependence of
the equilibrium constants
the gas-phase
FTICR
instrument
charge transfer
used
in this
reactions.
There
study to determine
s no provision
the temperature
on the
dependence of
was
used
ion-molecule
to attempt
phase electron
reactions.
Therefore,
to provide estimates of
attachment
to coordination
entropy
statistical
changes
compounds.
mechanics
gas-
results
of the
calculations
reported
in this
study
have
provided
insights
into
magnitudes
involving
of entropy
coordination
changes
complexes,
for electron
both
attachment
in the gas-phase
processes
in solution
have enabled estimates
to be made
for the change
in heterolytic M-O
bond
energies.
M(H20)
represent
Data
and M(H20)
one of
of this
ions,
type
are scarce
where M are
series
first
complex
for metal
transition
ions
complexes.
series metals,
for which metal-ligand
bond
energies
and solvation
energies
are known
for both
ions
that
form
the redox
couple.
Generally,
even
less
is known
of the
thermodynamics
of redox
processes
at metal
centers
involving negative
ions.
data
obtained
for the
B-diketonate
complexes
in the
present
work
therefore
broaden
present
understanding
of the thermodynamics
of redox
processes
that
occur
at transition metal
centers
in different
coordination
environments.
enthalpy of
uncertainty
the enolic O-H bond
since
no experimental
in acetylacetone
data
introduces
are available.
From
the greatest
results
of thermal
presented
gas-phase cha
in the present
enolic O-H bond
enthalpy.
rge-transfer
work,
From
reactions
an improved
the original
involving
estimate i
1 reaction
aca
s made
c' ions,
for the
calorimetry
data
improved
estimates
are made
for the average M-0O
homolytic
heterolytic
bond
dissociation
enthalpies
for M(acac)3
complexes.
data,
when
combined with
the gas-phase electron attachment
energy
data
for the M(acac)3
complexes,
has allowed
the average heterolytic
homolytic bond
dissociation
enthalpies
for the
corresponding
gas-phase
M(acac)3
" ions
to be determined.
It has been
shown for M(H20
redox
couples of
first
transition metal
series
ions
that
the trend
in the magnitudes
reduction
potentials
for these couples
can be related
quite
successfully
to the
trend
in the electron
attachment
energies of
free M+3
ions
(the negative value of
the third
ionization
potential
of M(g))
correcting the reduction
potentials
for the difference
between
heterolytic M-0
bond
enthalpies
in the oxidized and
reduced
form of
each
redox
couple.
35-37
Although
the difference
in absolute magnitudes
electron
solution
attachment
can only b
energies
e accouted
between M+3
for by adc
ions
in the gas-phase
litionally
considering
solvation
energies
, nephelauxetic
effects
in the
completed
ions
and the
absolute
potential
variance
neglected
of the electrochemical
of the
when
sums of
compared
reference electrode
these quantities
to the difference
is generally
used,
small
in heterolytic
bond
periodic
enough
to be
energies.
trend
energies
in the difference between metal
between
the ions
that
form redox
-ligand
couples
heterolytic
bond
can be estimated
from
3+/2+
line
for the electron attachment
energies of
free
ions.
In this
way,
a simple explanation
is provided
for the
trends
in the
reduction
potentials.
the M(acac)3
The trend
complexes
in the gas-phase electron
in the
present
work
attachment
energies
explained by using
similar
approach
to that
taken
for the M(H20) 32
couples.
Introduction
to Metal
B-Diketonate Complexes
transition metal
belong to
great
many
the general
B-diketone
class
ligands
complexes
of metal
that
investigated
in the
B-diketonates.5,39
coordinate
present
There
to metals.
work
are
general
structure
of B-diketones
is shown
in Figure
1-1.
The most
common
ligands
hydrogen,
have R1
and R2
but several
= alkyl,
other
perfluoroalkyl
ligands
have been
and aryl
reported
groups,
which
and R3
R3 is
also
alkyl
or aryl.
?R2
0
Keto
Form
Enol
Forms
Figure
1-1.
Structure of
B-diketones
in keto and
enol
forms.
Figure
1-1 illustrates
the the keto-enol
tautomerism
that
exists
in many
B-diketones.
hydrogen
atom at
the B
ring
carbon
atom
S. ^^
\ R, R
C
0
0
\ /
Ligand
Abbrev.
Acetylacetonate
acac
Trifluoroacetylacetonate
Hexafluoroacetylacetonate
tfac
hfac
(cisoid)
conformation.
The proportion
of the enol
tautomers
generally
increases when
an electron withdrawing
group
such
as a halogen
atom
present
as R3.
The enolization
also
increases when
ligands
fluorinated or
contain
an aromatic
ring.
Substitution by
a bulky
group
(e.g.
alkyl)
at the
ring a or
carbon
atoms
causes
steric
hindrance
between R3
and RI
particularly
in the enol
tautomer,
this
together with
significantly
the inductive effects of
reduce
the proportion of
the alkyl
the enol
groups may
tautomer
at equilibrium.
Since
complexation
to a metal
is believed
to occur through
enol
form
ligand,
result
poor
attempts
yields.
to obtain metal
complexes
of these
ligands
often
complexes
transition metal
investigated
complexes
in the
of the ligands
present
hfac,
work are
tfac
tris-chelate
acac.
structures
structure
of the
of the
coordinated
complexes
ligands are given
themselves
are
shown
in Figure
in Figure
, which
shows
the two optical
isomers
that
exist
in tris
B-diketonate
complexes.
are
Table
1-1.
Structural
Details
of Metal
Tris
(B-Diketonatesj
Complex
V(acac)
V(acac)3(
Cr(acac)3
Mn(acac)3
Fe(acac),
Co(acac)3
Co(acac
(Bu4N*
Average
O-M-O
Angle
88.0
87.3
91.1
97.2
87.1
97.3
91.5
c)
salt)
acac)3
Cr(hfac)3
Fe(hfac)3
94.0
87.0
87.0
Bite
M-O
Average
Bond
Length/A
.979
.982
.952
.901
.992'
.898
.981
.000
.987
.999
aData
bData
CData
dData
eData
Data
Data
hData
'Data
taken
taken
taken
taken
taken
taken
taken
taken
from ref
from ref
from ref
from ref
from ref
from ref
from ref
from ref
taken from ref
3(a)a
For symmetrical
two optical
isomers
ligands
are possible
and R2
(Figure
in Figure
1-3).
are
The d
and 1
same),
optical
isomers
of Cr(hfac)3
have been
isolatated by
gas-chromatographic
techniques
by using
an optically
active
support.
For unsymmetrical
ligands
can exist
and R2
in a
cis or
Figure
trans
are not the
conformation.
same)
each
It has been
optical
found
isomer
using
gas-chromatograph equipped with
an electron
capture dectector
that
Cr(hfac)3
gas-phase.
unsymmetrical
investigations
intramolecular
undergoes
dynamic
cis-trans
Tris(B-diketonate)
ligands
have
intramolecular
transition metal
received
of the mechanisms
structural
that
isomerism
considerable
have been
isomerism
complexes
attention
in the
regarding
proposed
in tris-chelate
complexes.
50-52
several
X-ray
are
of the
crystal
tris-chelate metal
structures or
available.
"bite"
complexes
gas-phase
angle of t
studied
electron
ligands
in this
diffraction
and the M-0O
report,
structures
bond
lengths
obtained
from these
investigations
are presented
in Table
1-1.
"bite"
angle of
the oxygen donor
atoms
is in all
cases
is quite
close
, which
gives
a pseudo-octahedral
arrangement
about
central metal
atom of
0 donor
atoms.
Properties
and Applications of
Metal
B-Diketonates
In this
section
some
background
is given
of the
chemical
physical
properties
and applications
transition metal
B-diketonates.
The emphasis
on the M(acac)3,
M(tfac)3
and M(hfac)3
complexes
of the
first
study,
transition metal
although other
series,
complexes
which
are the
are included.
subject
Much
of the
of the
present
relevant
* ~1 nL a a a A.. t. .7 --A S S -
i i
u.^
_ *
Rather,
this
section deals
with
the more
interesting
relevant
miscellaneous
literature on
transition metal
B-diketonates
that may
serve
to acquaint
The physical
reader with
and chemical
these
properties
compounds.
transition metal
B-diketonates
have generated
a great
deal
of research
interest
since
they were
compounds
properties
first
stems
synthesized
not only
as coordination
in the
year
from their
complexes,
1887.
spectroscopic
but also
from
interest
in these
structural
their
remarkable
physical
properties.
Many metal
B-diketonates
are volatile,
which
Morgan
and Moss
in the
year
1914
to describe B-diketones
as the
ligands
that
"gave wings
to metals"
The factors
that
determine
volatility
octahedral
of metal
complexes,
B-diketonates
an increasing
have
been
amount
discussed.
of fluorination
Generally,
in the
ligand
leads
to greater volatility.
Hence,
for the complexes
studied
in the
present
work,
the order
of increasing volatility
is M(acac)3
< M(tfac)3
< M(hfac)3.
The M(tfac)3
complexes
are usually
only marginally more
volatile
than M(acac)3 due
to the dipole moments
present
in the
cis and
trans
forms
of M(tfac)3
complexes.
volatility
of transition metal
B-diketonates
has enabled
them
to be
applied
studied by
a variety of
to ligated metal
centers
physical
that
methods
exist
that
as ions.
are not readily
vapor-phase
He(I)
photoelectron
spectra
of M(hfac)3
and M(acac)3
complexes
have
been reported.
54,55
The spectra
were
interpreted
in terms
of elementary
molecular
orbital
theory,
which
yielded
information
concerning the
details
of the metal-ligand
bonding,
and in the
case
of transition metal
comply
exes
, information about
the the relative energies of
the metal
ligand
orbitals.
method
does
not require
high
vacuum and
accordingly
has the
advantage of
relative ease
for large
scale
application
with
poss
ibility of
coating
complicated
shapes.
Thin
films of
superconducting
YBa2Cu307
have
been
prepared
a process
that
involves
thermal
decomposition
flow of
a vapor mixture of
B-diketonate
precursors of
, Cu and
Ba in
argon.
There
are several
comply
exes
of yttrium and
copper that
sufficiently
volatile
and thermally
stable
to be used
for this
purpose
These
include
Y(dpm)3
Cu(acac)
and Cu(dpm)
". Barium
complexes
are
less
thermally
stable
experimental
and decomposition has
conditions.
The most
been
success
reported
this
under
respect
the
has been
obtained
with
Ba(fod)2,
where
fod = 2,2
dimethyl-6,6,7
7,8,8,8-
heptafluoro
octadionate.
B-diketonate precursors
volatilized
controlled
the gas mix
in separate
to give
ture before
sources
the desired
it reaches
and their
flow rates
stoichiometric
a high
ratio.
temperature
are
carefully
Oxygen
reactor
is added
containing
substrate onto which
the superconducting
layer
to be deposited
Water vapor
has been
added
to the oxygen
flow to
aid in the decompostion
of the complexes
hydrolysis.
Substrates
used
so far have
been
rTiO3,
Al203
and yttria
stabilized
zircona
(YSZ),
deposited
films
are
usually
5-10
pm thick.
After the decomposition
period,
variety
of annealing processes
have been
used
(depending
on the
B-diketonate
precursors
used)
to convert
initially
deposited
layer
into
superconducting
YBa2Cu307.
By this method,
films
of good
compositional
and dimensional
uniformity
are produced.
A similar method
has been
type
used
These
to produce
thin-film
thin
superconducting
superconductors
films of
have critical
TI-Ba-Ca-Cu-0
temperatures
range
of 90-120
K with
the onset
zero
resistance
at 65-100
-. S .t a
are
are
I a
The volatility
of metal
1-diketonates
has allowed
several
investigations
of their
gas-phase
positive
and negative
ions
using
mass
spectrometry
Much
of the work with
positive
ions
has concerned
the determination
appearance
potentials62
and mechanisms
fragmentation
subsequent
interesting work has
to electron
been reported by
impact
Pierce
ionization
Some
and co-workersM
investigation
of the secondary
ion mass
spectrometry
(SIMS)
laser
desorption
of solid
samples
transition metal
B-diketonates.
of the
aims of
the study was
compare
the ionic
species
formed by
conventional
El ionization
to to
those
formed
from
SIMS
and LD.
SIMS
spectra revealed
catonization of
intact
neutral M(acac)3
complexes
ionic
fragments
produced
in the plasma,
as well
as the
ionic
fragments
themselves.
Ions
masses
corresponding to the
following
stoichiometries were observed M(acac) +
, M(acac)2
, M2(acac)3
M2 (acac) +. These
species
had also
been
observed
in a
study
of M(acac)3
complexes
using
high
pressure mass
spectrometry.65
Catonization
neutral
chloride
M(acac)3
of these
, Ag
cations
and NH4+
was also
were mixed with
found 1
Solid
to occur when
sample of
metal
diketonate.
SIMS
spectra
of mixed
samples
of M(acac)3
complexes
of two
different metals produced mixed metal
clusters
of the
same general
formula.
When
certain mixtures of
a metal
B-diketonate,
a chloride
different
transition metal
and a cationizing
agent
were vaporized,
ligand
exchange was
and NH4C1
found
produced
to occur.
Cr(acac)*
For example,
, Cr(acac)2
a mixture
SFe(acac) +
of Fe(acac)3,
CrCl3
, Fe(acac)2
acac)-CH3 ]
For other mixtures
no ligand
exchange
fragments
were
detected.
spectra
of laser
desorbed
samples
produced many
of the
same
fragment
ions
observed
in the
SIMS
experiments.
Interestingly,
rn a rr-nrao ni tho nroaoni -hfl1r-~ 1 4nnnd ovr'hnnrwo Ii a boon nhantvnd
* ---1-
S
nfl
1 < nan
h hoon
rnaoi~xror
&
LJI i r ar _
f-
T n
exchange was
found not
to occur.
To probe the
structure of
bimetallic
clusters,
Pierce
and co-workers
used
collisional
dissociation
to observe
pathways
for fragmentation.
The resulting
spectra
indicated
that
the cluster
ions
could
not be considered
simply
as metal
cations.
Rather,
a stable
structure
involving metal
atoms
was
invoked
with
possible metal-metal
bonding.
Reports
on the negative
ion mass
spectra
of metal
B-diketonate
complexes
volatility
have
focused
very
largely
large
cross
on M(hfac)
sections
complexes
for electron
due to their
high
capture.
thrust
of the work has
been
to determine
the fragmentation
pathways
the parent
ions
following
70 eV ElI
ionization.
66-71
possibility
using negative
ion mass
spectra
some metal
B-diketonates
as an
analytical
technique
in the field of
ultra
trace metal
analysis
has been
investigated.67
Some results of
previous
investigations
of negative
ions
formed
from metal
B-diketonate
precursors
are discussed
in the
experimental
section
this
dissertation,
in comparison
to the
results
obtained
in this
work.
A large number of
metal
tris(B-diketonate
complexes exhibit
reversible electrochemical
behavior,
especially those containing the
metals
Ru and
There
are numerous
reports
on the
effect
of the
ligand R
substituents
(Figure
1-2)
on experimentally
observed E1/2
values
for electrochemical
reduction
of these complexes
72-76.159-164
substituent
effects
are quite
pronounced.
For example,
values
reported
for Ru(dpm)
and Ru(hfac)3 differ
1.84
V in
dimethylformamide.
For series
of tris(B-diketonate)
complexes
of the
same metal,
the trends
in reduction
potentials
correlate
predictably
with
the electron
releasing or withdrawing
nature of
ligand
ring
aithal- 4 Fnort4- a 4-ho nrAor V.,; OOO .aaA..n. 4 an Ca.. n am 1 a.. an a LItt
- -
LJ
f~hl l o
*/-/4 /^+ /^.*"
aromatic"
character
It has been
shown
that
there
a strong
correlation between
the trends
values
for the reduction
series
of tris(B-diketonate)
complexes
of the same metal
and Hammett
parameters
that
have been
derived
from observations
of the effect
ring
substituents
on the
thermodynamics
and kinetics
involving
reactions
of organic
aromatic
compounds.
Interestingly,
for complexes
varying
with R3
= H (Figure
1-2),
there
is generally
a closer
correlation between El/2 potentials
a para
parameters
than meta
parameters
despite
the meta
position,
with respect
to the metal
center,
of the carbon atom that bears
the ring
substituent.
However,
since
oxygen
donor
atoms
in the
ligand
are para
to the
substituted
ring
carbon
atoms,
the phenomenon has
been attributed
to the distribution
electron density
values
at the oxygen
can be explained
atoms.
in terms
From this
of ligand
standpoint
field
value of
theory
considering the varying magnitude of
the spherical
component
of the
ligand
field
The
manifest
produced by the oxygen
quasi-aromatic
nature of
by the occurence of
donor
atoms.
coordinated B-diketonate
electrophillic
substitution
ligands
reactions
metal
B-diketonate complexes.
These
reactions
produce
complexes
that
are not
easily
formed by normal
reaction
routes.
Substitution
occurs
B carbon
electrophiles.
halogenation,
formylation.
atom of
The wide
nitration,
The reaction
ligand
variety
(Figure
1-1)
of reactions
diazotization,
conditions must
with
a variety
can be classified
thiocyanation,
be chosen
into
acetylation and
so that
acid
labile
B-diketonate
rings
are not
degraded.
The most
widely
studied
complexes
are therefore
ruthenium(III)
which are
those of
chromium(III)
not hydrolyzed
in acid
cobalt(III)
solution.
and R2
Description
of the FTICR
Technique
Production,
traopinQ,
and mass
analysis of
ions
In 1974
Marshall
and Comisarow77
developed
a method
of applying
Fourier transform technique
to the analysis
of the masses
relative
abundances of
ions
trapped
an ion cyclotron
cell.
simultaneous
detection of
many
ions
over
a wide mass
range
circumvented
many
mass
of the
limitations of
spectrometry
ICR)
the original
technique.
Since
scanning
then,
ion cyclotron resonance
Fourier
transform
method,
known
as Fourier transform
ion cyclotron
resonance mass
spectrometry
(FTICR)
has developed
into
a powerful
versatile
technique
in mass
spectrometry.
FTICR
technique
is based
on the
classical motion
of ions
described by elementary
laws
of electromagnetism.
The magnetic
force
(Lorentz
force,
= q(VxB)
acting
on a particle of
mass
M, charge q,
initial
velocity
V in
a field of magnetic
induction
B causes
follow
a helical
path
Figure
1-4.
The constrained
circular motion has
frequency
frequency
in Hz given by v
falls
in the
= qB/2irM.
range of
This
radio wave
frequency
is the cyclotron
frequencies
(0.01
- 2.00
MHz)
for magnetic
fields
on the order
of 1
tesla.
To prevent
ions
from
travelling
along the
helical
path
and being
lost
, ions
are
produced
between
two trapping
plates perpendicular
to the magnetic
field.
These
plates
are maintained
at a repulsive
potential
(typically
or -1 volt
for positive and negative
held
in a
defined
ions,
region between
respectively), a
the two plates.
ions
thereby
Excitation
sets
of plates
magnetic
and detection of
(transmit
field between
and receive
trapped
plates)
ions
lying
n tho
require
along the
additional
axis
of the
the tranoino nlateB.
are
heavl
proT
electron
collector
receiver
plate
trapping
plate
transmitter
receiver
grplate
grid
filament
tra pping
plate
used
in the
present
study
has a 2
tesla
superconducting magnet).
Ions
can be
formed
the cell
from the
low background
pressure
admitted
sample by
an ioni
zing electron
beam
passing
through
small
holes
in the
trapping plates or
by photoioni
zation
via irradiation
through
semi-transparent
grids
one or more
plates
. Application
external
oscillating
electric
field
across
transmit
plates
at the
characteristic
cyclotron
frequency
an ion
causes
ions
of that
mass
cell
orbits of
to move
larger
into resonance with
radius.
The kinetic
the applied
energy of
field
spiral
ion is given by
= 27r2
into
2 2
where
resonance with
r is the radius
the applied
electric
of the orbit.
field
As the
their motion
ions move
is shifted
from having
a random distribution
simultaneously moving
phase with
of phases
to that
the applied
field
of all
as a "packet"
ions.
If the
applied
field
is turned
or moves
out of phase with
ions,
ion packet
persists
long enough
to induce
an image
current
the detect
plates80 before
collisions with
neutral
molecules
restore the
initial
cyclotron
random distribution
frequency
of phases
of the ion packet
induced
contains
image
information
current
in the
at the
time
domain
about
the frequency
(mass)
of the
ion,
inten
sity of
signal
produced
is dependent
on the
ion population.
In order to
simultaneously detect
the masses
populations
many
different
ions
present
in the cell
, a fast
radio
frequency
sweep
applied
to the transmit
plates
corresponding to
the mass
range of
interest.
As each
ion of
a particular mass
moves
into
resonance
superposition
signal
stored
of image
is amplified
a computer.
currents
digitized b
The rapid
is generated
y an analog
sweep/detect
in the detect
to digital
circuit.
converter
is repeated many times
a mass
spectrum.
magnitude of
The high mass
the magnetic
field
range
, with
ais determined
increasing
primarily
resolution
by the
toward
lower
masses.
tesla
field
yields good mass
resolution
up to approximately
3000
amu.
Thus,
FTICR technique
has the
high
resolution
at large
values
complexes.
required
to study many
The lower mass
limit
higher molecular weight metal
is governed by the maximum rate of
signal
digitization.
With
a 5.2 MHz digitizer
and a 3
tesla magnet,
this
limits
the detectable masses
to >17
amu.
A lower magnetic
field
allows
the detection of
accompanying decrease
important
high mass
lower mass
ions
such
as OH"
with
resolution.
Manipulations
of ions in the trao
Between
the ionization
and detection
events
any one
ionic
mass
be kinetically
excited by
application
a single
frequency pulse
transmit
plates.
A range
of masses
can be excited by
a frequency
sweep.
absorb
Selected
sufficient
ions
can be ejected
energy
to spiral
from
the cell
out to orbits
completely
of such
large
if they
radius
that
they
strike
the cell
plates
ion ejection).
a low amplitude
pulse or
sweep
is applied,
the kinetic
energy
ions
can be
increased without
ejecting them
from the cell
technique
can be
used
to explore endothermic
of reactants,
and this
reaction
translational
channels by
excitation
increasing the
one way
energy
by which
structural
and thermodynamic
information
can be obtained.
An important
factor
contributing to the great
versatility of
FTICR
is that
tailored
pulse
sequences
can be
applied
in almost
combination.
can
CHAPTER
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
AND
RESULTS
Preparation of Tris(hexafluoroacetylacetonate)
Scandium and
Complexes
Qallium tris(hexafluoroacetvlacetonate)
aqueous
chloride,
solution
containing
an excess of
ammonia
approximately
solution
was
gram of
added,
scandium or
which
gallium
precipitated
Sc(OH)3 or Ga(OH)3
respectively.
The precipitate was
filtered,
washed
and dried and
then
refluxed
one hour with
a 3-fold molar
excess
hexafluoroacetylacetone
(20%
in light
petroleum ether).
When
cool,
reaction mixture was
filtered,
and the
filtrate evaporated
to yield
colorless
crystals
(Sc(hfac)3)
or pale orange
crystals
(Ga(hfac)3
crystals were
purification.
sublimed at
torr
and 40-50C to effect
further
Titanium and
vanadium tris(hexafluoroacetvlacetonatei.
Both
these
complexes
standard
manifold.
light
TiCl3
are air
techniques
sensitive
involving
A 3-fold molar
petroleum ether)
a Schlenk
tube
was
and preparation
Schlenk tubes
excess
added
against
was
achieved by using
and a Schlenk argon/vacuum
of hexafluoroacetylacetone
to approximately
a flow of
argon.
gram of
(20%
VCl3 or
The mixture was
refluxed
for three
hours
under
a blanket
argon
then
allowed
cool.
solvent
containing the
dissolved
product
was
decanted
from
any unreacted
solids
into
a second Schlenk
tube,
which
had been
purged
with
argon,
prior to the
transference
using
a cannula
with
filter
attachment.
solvent
was
removed
by vacuum
to yield
chocolate
Chromium
tris(hexafluoroacetylacetonate).
This
compound
available
commercially
from Strem Chemicals
Ltd,
was
used
received.
ManManese trislhexafluoroacetvlacetonate).
The most
convenient
and simple method
of preparation
for this
complex was
found
to be that
reported by
Evans
and co-workers.55
Approximately
gram of
Mn203
added
to a
Schlenk tube,
followed by
a 3-fold molar excess
hexafluoroacetylacetone
(20%
in light
petroleum ether).
The mixture was
refluxed
for 48 hours
under
an argon
atmosphere
then
allowed
cool.
The resulting
black
solution
was
filtered
concentrated
yield
dark
green
crystals,
which
were
purified by vacuum
sublimation.
Only moderate
yields
of Mn(hfac)3
are obtained by this method,
since
it is
simple
for the gas-phase
and convenient,
studies
and only milligram
reported
amounts were
in this dissertation,
required
procedure
adequate.
Cobalt
tris(hexafluoroacetvlacetonate).
The most
convenient
method
for the
preparation
of Co(hfac)3
was also
found
to be that
reported by
Evans.
To approximately
gram of
cobalt
trifluoride
(CoF3)
which
in a Schlenk tube was
in this
reaction acts
added
gram of
as a hydrogen
anhydrous
fluoride
sodium
scavenger.
fluoride,
A 6-fold
molar
excess
(to the
amount
of CoF3)
of cooled
hexafluoroacetylacetone
added slowly to
powder mixture and
then
reaction mixture was
refluxed
one
hour.
Note that
no solvent
is added
to the
reaction
mixture.
During the
reflux period
the solution
turned
deep green.
Approximately
20 cm3
of light
petroleum ether was
then
added
to the
reaction mixture
, which was
stirred
and then
filtered.
solution
concentrated
to yield
dark green
crystals
of Co(hfac)3,
which
were
was
was
was
was
Preparation of
Tris(acetvlacetonate)
Complexes
except
11 the M(acac)3
for Ti(acac)3.
sublimation.
complexes
were
purchased
The compounds were
The Ti(acac)3
complex,
it is necessary to exclude
like
atmospheric
(Strem
purified
Ti(hfac)3
oxygen
Chemicals
before
is air
from
use
Ltd.)
vacuum
sensitive,
reaction
mixture during preparation by using
Schlenk apparatus
as was
done
V(hfac
Ti(hfac)3.
The complex was
prepared by
slowly
adding
mixture of
solution o
grams
of acetylacetone
f approximately
gram of
and 2
TiCl3
grams of
stirring
triethylamine
in 25 cm3
to a
of ethanol,
under an
addition
argon
atmosphere
and refluxing
accompanied by
reaction mixture
is not
a dark blue
necessary.
coloration
Formation
in the
becomes
of the
solution.
hot during the
complex
After
stirring
for 1
hour the
solution
containing the dissolved
product
was
transferred
to a second Schlenk tube
that
had been
purged with
argon.
solvent
removed by vacuum to
yield
dark blue crystals of
Ti(acac)3.
Purification was
ethanol/water mixtures
sublimation before use
Preparation
effected by repeated recrystallization
The product
was
of Ruthenium
from degassed
further purified by vacuum
Tris(B-diketonates)
ruthenium B-diketonate
complexes
investigated
in the
present
work
are
Ru(hfac)3,
Ru(tfac)3
and Ru(acac)3
complex
hfac)3
available
from Strem Chemicals
Ltd and was
used
as received.
The other
two complexes
reported by E
were
ndo
prepared by
and co-workers.
using the
rutheniumm blue"
Approximately
grams
method
of hydrated
-7
was
this
time
initial
orange
color of
solution
became
almost
black.
A 9-fold molar
excess
of ligand
(trifluoroacetylacetone or
acetylacetone)
was
added
to the
reaction mixture which
was
then
allowed
to continue
refluxing
for an additional
hour,
during which
time
solution became
red.
Next,
12 grams of
potassium hydrogen
carbonate
dissolved
in 50 cm"3
de-ionized water was
added
to the
flask
dropwise
over
a period
of 10 hours
while the
reaction mixture was
continued
to be
refluxed.
flask was
cooled
and the
solvent
was
evaporated by using
a rotary evaporator.
Benzene was
added
to the
flask
to dissolve
residue,
which
was
then
washed
with
three
portions
of 1 M
sodium hydroxide
solution.
The washed benzene
solution
was
dried
standing
over
purified by
anhydrous
sodium
loading onto a
1/2"
sulfate.
Finally,
chromatography
column
product
packed
was
with
mesh
alumina.
The column
was eluted with benzene
resulting
solution
crystals
concentrated
(Ru(tfac)3).
to yield or
No further
ange crystals
purification
(Ru(acac)3)
or red/orange
of these compounds
was
found
to be necessary.
OrQanic
Compounds
The organic
compounds
employed
in the
present
study were
purchased
from
commercial
sources
and used
without
further
purification.
extraneous or
fragment
ions were detected
in their
negative
ion mass
spectra.
Electron Attachment
Studies
J i D L m
dependence of
populations
of parent
negative
ions
formed
from a
mixture of
known
partial
pressures
of two
reactants
are monitored
they
charge
transfer with
the neutrals.
For the reactions
indicated
2-1,
free energy
involved
for electron
capture
species
be bracketed
within
the lower
limit
of the
known
value
for A and
upper
limit
of the
known
value
+ B
+ C
+ B"
+ C
When
the free energy
change
is small
kcal
with FTICR)
as in the case
, the equilibrium populations
the ions
can be measured.
+ B"
neutral
reactants
are in large
excess
and their partial
pressures
not vary during the
reaction
The equilibrium constant
for the
reaction
in equation 2-2
can be obtained
from the ratio of
the equilibrium
population
reactant
spectrometer
calibrated
of the two ions,
gasses.
and the ratio of
Measurement
is achieved by using
for each reactant
the partial
pressures
an ion
by using
gauge.
an external
pressures
on the mass
gauge was
baratron
capacitance manometer
in the
pressure
range of
torr.
- 10-5
Special
pressure
calibration
procedures
developed
for the FTICR
systems were
used
that
ensure
uniform reactant
gas pressure throughout
system by
adjusting the
relative
pumping
rates of
the two diffusion
pumps
connected
to the
high
vacuum
chamber.83
The equilibrium
constant
a a a S S
can
I I
m
A
*
charge-transfer
equilibrium method has
been
used
in ICR
experiments16-19
and PHPMS experiments10d15
to provide electron
attachment
energies
organic
enthalpy
for a large
compounds st
change
number
died,
(AHrxno)
of organic
compounds.
the corresponding
have been obtained by
entropy
For many of
change
following the
temperature
dependence of
the equilibrium.
11,12,14,15
The results
have
produced
ladders
of multiple overlapping values
AGrxn'
AHrxn
and AS
pairs
of organic
reactants
such as
substituted benzophenones,
nitrobenzenes,
10,11,13,17-19
quinones14,19
and dicarbonyls.
absolute
values
for electron
capture
by each
compound,
(defined by
AGa
for the
reaction A
= A')
are obtained by
including
an external
standard
in the
ladders
for which AHa
and AS
are well
established.
For example
EA of
SO2 has
been accurately determined
to be 1.097
0.036 eVM
and 1.107
photoelectron
0.0008 eV85
spectroscopy of
in two
SO2",
independent
ind SO?
investigations
is the reference
compound
chosen
in the EA
investigations
of Kebarle.
value
evaluated by the methods of
statistical mechanics
from
structural
and spectroscopic
data.
Electron attachment
and electron
transfer
ecuilibrium
studies
using the
Nicolet
FT/MS
1000.
Gas-phase
charge-transfer
reactions
type outlined
2-1 and in
were
studied
in the
present
work by using
a Nicolet
FT/MS
1000
Fourier
transform
ion cyclotron
resonance mass
spectrometer
(FTICR
A diagram of
instrument
used
given
in Figure
2-1.
The technique used
in the
present
work was
similar to
that
reported
previously
in ion cyclotron resonance mass
spectrometry
(ICR)
investigations.
and pulsed high
e temperature of
pressure
mass
the reaction
spectrometry
cell
(PHPMS)
was measured
under
was
Ion Gauge
Superconducting Magnet
II
SSorxjs Prb
* I
Inlet System
-. -- ..-.-..--- .-.--.-..- ..
Ion Trap
Gate Valve Baratron
Mechanical Pumps
Diffusion Pump
Inlet Diffusion Pump
measured
equilibrium constant,
and a value of
for the
organic
compound
compound
organic
to admit
at the reaction
from the
compounds
tabulated
temperature
values of
and the M(hfac)3
into the mass
spectrometer
of 350 K (obtained
and AS ).
complexes
through
were
for each
Most
organic
of the
sufficiently volatile
leak valves
without
heating.
Less
volatile organic
and the M(acac)3
complexes
were
sublimed
tip of
a solids
temperature of
probe
- 350 K.
placed well
Negative
away
ions
from the
were
ion trap,
produced
which
was
from neutrals
FTICR
capture by
trap by
the metal
capture of
low energy
complexes was,
electrons
in most
cases,
Electron
accompanied
varying
amounts
of fragmentation.
Parent
ions were
selected
from
these
fragments
ion ejection
techniques.
To approach
collisional
thermalization
ions
prior
to the
ion/molecule
reaction,
FTICR relies on a
set thermalization
period
between
pressures
ionization
in this
and detection
study were
of product
in the 10"6 torr
ions.
range,
Typical
reaction
but a bath
such
as argon
or cyclohexane
can be
added
to reactant mixtures
if lower
reactant
pressures
are used.
For both bracketing
and equilibrium
experiments
a thermalization
period
of 1
s was
used
Assuming
a second
order
collision rate constant
pressure of
10o6 torr,
each
molecule"1
ion collides
sec
an average of
about
at a total
it 30 times
with
neutral
reactant
molecules
before
charge-transfer
reactions
were
followed.
populations
When
a charge-transfer equilibrium was observed,
were determined by measuring the
relative
abundance of
parent
ions over
suitable
time
intervals
until
they
reached
constant
value.
The equilibration
could
be followed
for long
reaction
times
" 20
s) ensuring
complete
thermalization.
At the
reactant
equilibrium.
The electron
attachment
energies
for all the
compounds
studied
are presented
in Table
2-1.
results
are also presented
Figure
in the
2-2 to illustrate
present
the organic
reference compounds
that
were
used
work.
Table
for M(
2-1.
acac)
Free
Energies
of Electron Attachment
3, M(tfac)3 and M(hfac)3
Complexes.
(kcal
mol'-)
at 350 K
Sc(hfac)3
hfac)3
V(hfac)3
Cr(hfac)3
Mn(hfac)3
Fe(hfac)3
Co(hfac)3
Ga(hfac)3
Ru(hfac)3
Ru(tfac),
-64 3c
-69 3c
-73 2b
Sc(acac)3
Ti(acac)3
V(acac)3
Cr(acac),
-67 3c
-109
-93)
(-97)a
-60.4
(-89)a
-64.0 b
Mn(acac)
a Fe(acac)
Co(acac)
0.5b
-24.9
-20 1c
-59 3c
-43.0
0.5b
-47 2c
Ga(acac)
Ru(acac)
-38.7
0.5b
t 0.5b
aEstimated
value
values
for M(acac)3
obtained by
complex
adding
50 kcal
mol-1
to corresponding
(see text
bValue obtained from
Reference compounds
measured equilibrium constant.
given
in Figure
CValue
obtained by
bracketing
(see eq
2-1).
.--Mn(hfac)3 (109)
-*Co(hfac)3 (97)
Fe(hfac)3 (93)
Ru(hfac)3 (89)
Chlorine atom 83.4
CN
C
CN
V(hfac)3
73 4
Ti(hfac)3 69
Ru(tfac) 64.0
Cr(hfac)3 67
Sc(hfac)3 64
F F
Ga(hfac)3 60.1
Mn(acac)3 59
-56.0-
Co(acac)3 47
- 45.3
Fe(acac)3 43.0
NO2-6 CN -- 38
.8 -
26.3-
Ru(acac)3 38.7
V(acac)3
- 21.3--
Cr(acac
CH3 CH3
19.5-
48.7- -
42.7 --
CN
= CS
Electron
attachment
enerav
acac"
radical.
electron
attachment
energy
of acetylacetonate
radical
was
determined by the
bracketing method,
in which
occurrence or non-occurrence
of charge
transfer
reactions
involving
acac
- ions
with
organic
reference
compounds
were observed
2-1).
acac
" ions were generated by
heating
Co(acac)3
pressure
tip of
(-10"7
torr)
a solids
of Co(acac)3
probe
in the
to produce
FTICR main
a low partial
chamber.
Acetylacetonate
anions
were
produced
following
electron
impact
ionization
of the gas.
following the
time dependence of
population
acac
- ions
in the
presence of
approximately
torr
each
a series
of organic
reference compounds,
it was determined
that
acac
charge-transferred to
2,6-dichlorobenzoquinone,
tetrafluorobenzoquinone,
which
sets
limits
of the electron
attachment
energy
at 59 3
kcal mol"
(see
Figure
2-2).
Consistency
of Electron Attachment
Energy Determinations.
Although
lower
operating pressures
of ICR and FTICR,
compared
to PHPMS,
enable
low volatility
compounds
to be studied,6
this
also
introduces
greater uncertainty
in the measurement
of reactant
pressures.
To check
consistency
of the
results obtained
in the
present
work with
those
of previous determinations,
AGrxn
for the reaction
= 1,4-
dicyanoben
zene;
= 3-fluoronitrobenzene was measured.
For this
reaction
at 423 K Kebarle
has found
AGmrxn
= -3.2
kcal
cal mol
FTICR at
giving
a value
350 K we obtained
AGrxn
of AHrxn'
= -2.8
of -2.1 kcal mol"1
kcal
mol-1
which
In the
together with
the previous
determined entropy
change gives
AHrxn = -1.9 kcal
The discrepancy
temperature of
of 0.2 kcal
mol
the neutral
probably
error
arises
from
in measuring
uncertain
equilibrium
ann n A. -a J-I--~ --a -, --- A--- A- ~- 1 2.....2A. -r -3-,-~-- A a- -
not
mol
A
I i L
A-, 1l-
estimate of
the expected error
for free
energies
determined
equilibrium reactions,
and conservative
uncertainties
of 0.5 kcal
mol-1
assigned
to values
of AG
a
determined by equilibrium to
account
experimental
uncertainties
uncertainties,
in the assigned
including
temperature,
pressure
thermodynamic quantities
for most
of the
reference
compounds.
Electron
attachment
to tris (hexafluoroacetvlacetonate)
complexes
The M(hfac
complexes
studied
in this
investigation
were
those of
first
row transition metals
from Sc-Co,
Ga and Ru.
These
complexes
particularly volatile
and are easily
admitted
into
FTICR through
leak
valves on
inlet
system.
It has been
shown
previously70',71
that
for a series of
fragmentation f
first
row transition metal
following electron
capture
M(hfac)3
increases
complexes
from
that
left-to-right
row.
same general
trend
was observed
in the
FTICR
in this
work.
The major pathway to
fragmentation
was loss of
a ligand
ion,
this
ion predominated
in the mass
spectra
Fe and Co complexes
immediately
after
electron
capture.
A few hundred milliseconds
after
ionization,
the parent
was formed by
charge
transfer
to the
neutral
complex
from the
fragment
ions.
After
a suitable
period
time,
any remaining
By observing
fragment
ions
charge-transfer
were ejected
reactions
from the
cell.
involving M(hfac)3
complexes
organic
reference
compounds,
was
found
that
few had
-AG values
complexes
reported.
Fe(hfac)3,
that
as high
d values
as that
of the complexes.
greater than
Although AG a values
Co(hfac)3
the order of
any of the organic
could
and Mn(hfac)3
a AG values
Co and Mn
compounds
so far
not be experimentally measured
estimates
runs
parallel
were obtained by noting
to the
series
are
are
was observed
which
of the two parent
negative
ions
predominated
after
a charge
complexes
transfer period.
was determined.
relative order
The difference
for the
in AG values
series
between
V(acac)3
results
and V(hfac)3
of two
was determined
to be
-50 kcal
separate equilibrium reactions.
mol"'1
Assuming
from the
a constant
difference of
50 kcal mol1
the other metals
between
series,
the M(acac)3
estimates coi
and M(hfac)3
uld be made
complexes
for the
M(hfac)3
complexes
= Ru, Fe, Co, Mn)
since
those
for the M(acac)3
complexes of
in this way
same metals were measurable.
have been
in parentheses
Values
of AG
obtained
in Table
substance with
chlorine
atom,
the highest
Cl-(g)
accurately
was included
known
electron
in the
study
affinity
of charge
transfer
reactions
with
the metal
complexes.
Electron
capture by
background
pressure of
Fe(hfac)3
with a
small
partial
pressure
of benzyl
chloride
produced
complex.
was
Cl (g
found
in addition
that
when all
to the ions
ions
except
formed
from
chloride were
the metal
ejected
from the cell
and its subsequent
reaction
with Fe(hfac)3
was
followed,
chloride
ion regenerated Fe(hfac)3
" by
charge transfer,
indicating that
the electron
attachment
energy
of Fe(hfac)3
> 83.4
kcal mol"1
accord
with
value estimated
above.
Charge
transfer occurred
from tetrachlorobenzoquinone
(C14BQ)
Cr(hfac)3,
an equilibrium reaction
was
not observed
in the
reaction
with
Sc(hfac)3
as the reaction
was
hampered
rapid
formation
of adduct
ions
(hfac)3.Cl4BQ]
Sc(hfac)3]2
Electron
attachment
to tris(acetylacetonate)
complexes.
M(acac)3
complexes
has been
were
studied
previous
for the series
noted
that
of metals
cross-section
Sc-Co,
Ga and Ru.
for electron
capture by
U
$4 ref ar., 4- -a ^ ne 4 4- 4 an mns4- n 1
r'^
^" ^IaVTi
I
substituents
in the
former.
The same general
effect
was
observed
this
report
for the complexes of
the metals
Cr to Co
The only
produced
from
ionization
of the
neutral
with
the electron beam was
ligand
charge
anion,
transfer
but unlike
the M(hfac)3
to the neutral
complexes
complex to
form
, the
ligand
the parent
ion did
-on.
Parent
negative
ions
of these complexes
could only
be obtained
in reasonable
yields
electro
following ch
n attachment
emical
energy
ionization by an
. In performing
organic
compound
experiments
with
of lower
these
compounds,
of ligand
detectable
therefore,
anion
from
fragment
was necessary to
the cell.
ions
The Ti
and had large
eject
relatively
and V complexes
cross
sections,
large
amounts
produced
in accord with
trends
in stability of
the ions
noted above.
The difference
in the electron
withdrawing
effect
between
in the
series
of complexes was
also observed
to markedly
reduce
values
of AG
for the M(acac)3
series
relative
to the M(hfac)3
series,
and the values
of AG
fall
well
within
range of
those
the organic
compounds
in the reported
electron
transfer
free energy
ladder,
which
extends
from
approximately
10-75 kcal mol1
This
enabled
bracketing
and equilibrium reactions
2-1 and
2-2 to be
followed
for the entire
series
of M(acac)3
complexes.
The Cr(acac)3
ion, although
initially produced
in the FTICR
cell,
was
unstable
underwent
rapid
loss of
ligand
a rate
that
increased with
total
pressure of
dissociation.
previously. 8
the system,
instability
Bracketing this
indicating
a collisionally
of the Cr(acac)3
compound
through
has been
induced
observed
charge-transfer
reactions
was therefore hampered by
competitive
ligand
loss,
produce
greater uncertainty
in the
result.
Parent
negative
ions
could
A value of
In contrast
for the
to all the other
Ti(acac)3
complexes
complex
studied,
could
not be obtained.
Ti(acac)3
or its anion
did not
undergo detectable
electron
exchange
in the
time
scale
obtainable with
the FTICR,
even
with
relatively
high
pressures
neutral
gas.
Exothermic
charge
transfer
reactions
involving
Ti(acac)3
with
10"4)
various c
over the
)rganic rE
range of
sactants were too
to 1
slow to
eV of driving
follow
force
(krxn/kco
llision
The cause of
this
unexpectedly
slow ga
s-phase
charge transfer
not known
and would not
have
been
predicted
for a dl/d2
redox
process.
Charge-transfer
equilibria
were observed
for the
V and
complexes
, and results
for Cr
Mn and Co were obtained by the
bracketing
technique outlined
Gas-Phase
Spectroohotometrv
of Cr(hfac)3
gas-phase
visible
spectrum of
Cr(hfac)3
was
determined
order
to compare the
spectrum to
that
of Cr(hfac)3
in solution
(see
chapter
designed
The ga
sample
cell
s-phase
with
spectrum was
10 cm path
obtained by using
length
and fitted
with
a specially
heated
quartz
windows
a temperature
and separately
a few degrees
heated
cell
cooler than
body.
that
The body was maintained
cell
windows
ensure
that
crystals
of Cr(hfac)3
did not form on
windows
render
them opaque.
Crystals of
Cr(hfac)3
were
added
to the
cell,
which
then
evacuated and
positioned
in the
cell
compartment
an IBM
UV/visible
9430
spectrophotometer.
The cell
was gradually
heated
about
C to
produce
a practical
concentration of
vapor.
was
CHAPTER 3
TERMINOLOGY
AND CONVENTIONS
USED
IN GAS-PHASE
ION THERMOCHEMISTRY
Introduction
Values
for the energy
required
remove
an electron
from
isolated
atom,
molecule or
ion are often
obtained by using
spectroscopic
methods
that
yield
the minimum energy
required
for this
process.
This
energy
is the
adiabatic
ionization
potential
(alP)
for neutral
positively
charged
species
and the electron
affinity
for anionic
species.
used
Mass
spectrometric methods
to estimate values
for electron
and other techniques
attachment
energies
have
also been
ionization
energies
at T
K as well
for T > 0
In combination
with
other
thermochemical
data,
alP
and EA
values
provide
fundamental
information
concerning
the thermochemistry
of ionic
processes
such
as charge-
transfer
reactions
and ion solvation.
For example,
extensive
compilations
of enthalpies of
formation
of ions
at 298
K (AHf)
derived
from
spectroscopic
and mass
spectrometric
data
are
available.
Tabulated
values
for AHf
of ions
depend
on the
convention
used
to treat
the gas-phase electron.
consistently to avoid
90e,91
errors
Therefore,
in derived
a convention must
data.
be used
convention,
thermal
electron
convention
TEC),
is widely used by
thermodynamicists
treats
the electron
as a classical
ideal
gas.
stationary
electron
convention
(SEC)
"ion
convention"
is more
commonly used by
mass
spectrometrists
and treats
the electron
as a subatomic
particle
Presented
here
are definitions
some
important
terms
frequently
use.
stationary
electron
convention
is adopted
throughout
present
work,
the free energies
of electron
attachment
to the metal
complexes
obtained
in the present
work
conform to
this
convention.
Since a discussion of
energies of electron
the stationary
attachment
electron
and ionization
convention
processes
applied
to free
apparently
not appeared
in the
literature,
a discu
ssion
is give
here.
Electron Affinities
and Adiabatic
Ionization
Potentials
The electron detachment
process
for a monoatomic
or polyatomic
species Mn"
positive or
shown
(where
n is
charge
zero
negative).
M"(g)
= M(g)
The enthalpy
change
for electron
detachment
can be
expressed
as the
sum of
the enthalpy
change at
K and
the difference
heat
contents of
the products
and reactants
at temperature
T, given by
difference
in the
integrated heat
capacities
over
range
KtoT
3-2).
AHo(Mn..Mfnll)
T T
- AEo..o+ fCp(Mn+1) dT+ Cp
0 0
term AE00
is the energy
required
to form M"1
in its ground
electronic,
rotational,
and vibrational
states
from M"
in its ground
state.
When M"
a negative
ion,
AE0-0
defines
the electron
affinity
When Mn
is a neutral
or positively
charged
species,
can
- Cp(M0
0
of M"
AH(M" n M"n
If the geometries
of Mn
and M"1
differ,
will
be formed
excited
state
and the energy
required
for the
vertic
processes
be greater
than
for the
adiabatic
cess
Stationary
and Thermal
Electron
Conventions
Usually,
though
not always,
Mn and M"n
are
chemically
similar
neglect
and the difference
d with respect to
in their
that
integrated
of the electron.
heat
The
capacitie
thermal
can be
electron
convention,
however treats
the electron
as an ideal
which has
while
an integrated heat
under the stationary
electron
set to
zero.
capacity
electron
at constant
convention
pressure of
heat
relationship between
5RT/
capacity of
enthalpies o
electron
detachment between
two conventions
is given
AH(TEC)
- AH(SEC)
= 5RT/2
free energy
change
for the
process
eq 3-1 at a temperature
be written
in terms of
assoc
iated
enthalpy
entropy
changes
3-4).
AG(Mn
=- AH0Mn
- TASo(M"
-* Mn+')
value of
n in
3-4 for free
energy values derived
from
experimental
charge-transfer
The total
ASo M
entropy
is equal
to products
equilibrium
change
studies10-19,92
for the electron
- Sreactants
limited
detachment
+ S
to 0
process
(Mn+1f) -
can
- Mn+1
Mn+
SM +
Since the masses
of MI1
and Mn only
differ
the mass
an electron,
strains
for Mn1
and Mn will
be virtually
identical
these
terms
3-5 will
essentially
cancel.
eq 3-1 AStrans
is therefore
negligibly
different
from
tra 0
trans
(e-).
The translational
entropy
an ideal
particles
mass m can be
predicted
from
statistical
mechanics
by the
Sackur-Tetrode equation93
(eq 3-6)
where
V is the volume of
gas,
is the
Boltzmann
constant,
L is Avagadro
s constant
is Planck's
constant
the temperature.
5 +i (2inmkT
2 \ h2}
term A
given by
eq 3-7,
where QeLec
is the electronic
partition
function.
ASetec
= R In (Qeec(products)/QeLec(reactants))
The electron has
an electronic
degeneracy
of 2,
can
therefore
be rewritten
as eq
3-8.
ASelec
= R in (Qelec(M
/QeLec(Mn)
+ R ln2
free energy
for electron detachment given
3-2 can now be
given
according
to the two conventions.
thermal
electron
convention
includes
terms
for the
electron
, and AG
for electron
achment
is given by
Although t
experiment
Sackur-Tetrode equation
and theory
gives
for the translational
good agreement
entropy
. .
between
an atomic or .
0
Straw
AGo(TEC)
- AEo.o+ cCp(Mn1
0
T
- Cp(M)dT+ -RT
0
- T(ASrot
+ vib
+ R ln(Qeec (Ml1)/Qe ec(Mn
+ Strans(e
+ R In 2)
stationary
electron
convention
neglects
all terms
for the
electron
and AG
electron
detachment
given by eq
3-10.
AG(SEC)
- AEo.o+fCp(Mn1) dT
0
-JCp(Mn) dT
0
ASrot
+ ASvib
+ R in(Qelec(M
/Qet (Mn
3-10
temperature
at which
two conventions
give
same
value
AG(Mn -4 Mn+1
any spe
cies
can be
found by
subtracting the
right
side of
3-10
from
the right
side of
3-9 and
setting the difference
equal
zero
(eq 3-11).
5RT/2
- T(Strans
+ R In 2
3-11
Coll
ecting
the constant
terms
from the
Sackur-Tetrode equation
gives
diff
erence
between AG values
for each
convention
temperature,
-12).
[(AG(TEC)
- AG(SEC)]/J
= T(118
.3145
ln(T)5/2)
3-12
At 0
, AG
of electron detachment
is equal
to the
alP or
EA values,
there is no difference between the two
conventions
However
3-11
also
eaual
at 296.96
zero
and the two conventions
nive
identical
- T(
sw
A.
this
system the
heat
capacity terms
for H atom and
ion cancel,
ASrot
are equal
zero.
intersection
of the
lines
occurs
at 296.96
K where
the two conventions
give
same
value.
values
for each
convention
at 298 K are within
-0.02
kJ mol1
so can
be assumed
to be approximately
equal
at this
commonly
used
standard
temperature.
significance of
the result
for the
hydrogen
atom
can be
seen
in calculations
hydrogen
electrode
of the absolute
94.95
given
thermodynamic
by the
standard
potential c
free energy
standard
change
H (aq)
e (g)
= 1/2
3-13
value of
for eq
3-13
can be expressed
as the
sum of
values
for three
elementary
steps,
94,95
one of which
involves
ioni
nation
a gaseous
hydrogen atom,
eq 3-14.
H-(g
= H+(g
e (g)
3-14
value
for this
process,
and hence
value
for the
absolute
electrode
potential
(or "single
ectrode
potential")94,95,96-98
depends
ultimately on
which
electron
convention
is used.
absolute
value of
standard hydrogen electrode
used
to obtain
absolute
electron
attachment
to molecules
solution.
As noted
above,
coincidence there
is virtually no difference between
conventions
at 298 K (absolute
comparison between
= 4.44
data
This
allows
for free energies
for example
of electron
direct
attachment
to gas-
t
Also
process
to allow
shown
in Figure
appropriate
calculation
3-1 (b)
spectroscopic
a plot
data
of the relevant
of AG
is available9-101
heat
capacities,
for I2+
for 12
For this
0o
rot
The obvious
difference between
the plots of
for the
ionization
of H
atom and
is that
slope
for the
ion convention
values
opposite
and M I
of H
Under
the ion convention
is considered
results in
the SEC)
For I
a loss
a 211
and so ASOeec
of electronic
state
is formed
only the electronic
never
equal
degeneracy
from
a 'g
degeneracy
zero.
ASelec'
state,
Ionization
= R In 1/2
and ASetec
In 3
in the
SEC.
For most
small
molecules
such
as I
TAS
term
aris
from a
difference
change
between
in electronic
the alP of
degeneracy will
a polyatomic molecule
produce
and AG
largest
ionization
at T > 0
K. The difference
in the
integrated
heat
capacities
of I
differ
only
0.09
kJ mol
at 298 K and
combined
values
of TAS
only
amounts to
-0.5
kJ mol
at 298 K
somewhat
smaller than
the contribution
from
TASelec
. Further,
enthalpy
capacities
these
change
will
will
terms
arising
always
cancel
from
have
in the
the change
same
final
sign
in the
integrated
as the entropy
expression.
heat
change
The predominance of
the AS
eco0
etec
term produces the almost
linear
change
in free energy
SEC)
with
temperature
as shown
in Figure
Exactly
analogous
plots
of AG
of electron
attachment
an ion
neutral molecule under the
two electron
conventions
can be obtained by
plotting the
negative of
electron
detachment
values
given
3-10.
of electron
capture
has been
calculated
Chowdhury
combined wit
and co-workers11
spectroscopic
at 423 K from
and theoretical
the electron
data
affinity&
for the
of SO2
geometries
and
are
of Mn
The electronic degeneracy
change
is dominant
in the stationary
electron
convention,
and the dependence
of AG(SEC)
on T deviates
only
slightly
from
linearity
over
the temperature
range
shown.
13.68
13.66
13.64
13.62
13.60
13.58
13.56
13.54
a
297 K
i SEC
I
>Adiabatic
ionization
potential
9.24-
9.22 -
9.20 -
9.18 Adiabatic
ionization
9.16 potential
9.14-
9.12 -
9.10 -
9 .0 8 ,, ,, ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,1 11 11 11 11
* | *I | I I* S | I uI*'| I I I I *U *JI I...s|
TEC
O
C
LU
Ld
(U
-1.04
-1.06
-1.08
-1.10
-1.12
-1.14
-1.16
TEC
-(EA
297
SEC
-1.18
0 100 200 300 400
Temperature/K
500
600
CHAPTER
INTRAMOLECULAR ENTROPY
COUPLES
CHANGES
FO
INVOLVING COMPLEX METAL
R REDOX
IONS
Introduction
Entropy
changes
that
occur
for electron
attachment
to gas-phase
polyatomic molecules (ASa
temperature dependence of
have been
equilibrium
obtained by
constants
determining the
for gas-phase
charge-
transfer
reactions
eq 2-1)
by the
procedures
described
chapter
The entropy change
is obtained
from a
Van't
Hoff
plot
of the
data.
types
of compounds
studied
to date
have been
predominantly
organic
compounds with
delocalized
t systems,
often
containing electron
withdrawing substituents.
typically
fall
For these
in the range of
compounds,
4 cal mol1
values
of ASa0
a
are
small
An important
consequence of
equal
values
this
and constant
result
over
for the organic
is that
a wide
compounds
range of
that
and AHao values
temperatures.
have
been
studied,
are approximately
In fact,
which
are
usually measured
at temperatures
above
300 K, are typically within
kcal mol
of their
values
at 0
that
their
electron affinities
The electron
attachment
energy
data may therefore be combined with
other
compiled
without
enthalpy or
introducing
free energy data
serious
at 298 K or
at other
temperatures
errors.
It is useful
to obtain
data
for the temperature
dependence of
gas-
phase charge-transfer
reactions
involving
organometallic
coordination
compounds
since
a more
complete
understanding
of the
variety
of calorimetric
thermochemical
data
for metal-containing
compounds
difficult
energy
cycles
to obtain by more
that
provide
thermodynamic
conventional methods.
data
Examples
that
are
of the
application
of gas-phase electron
attachment
energies
energy
cycles
are given
in chapter
Organometallic
coordination
compounds
are chemically
dissimilar
to the
types of
organic
compounds
that
have been
studied
it can not
be assumed
that
values
for these
types
of compounds will
also
small
in all
cases.
Temperature dependent
gas-phase charge-transfer
equilibrium
n4-butadiene
studies
iron
involving metal
tricarbonyl
AS has
containing
been
compounds
quoted
are
rare.
to be 10 3
mol-1
considerably
higher
than
typical
values
found
for the
organic
compounds
that
have been
studied.
In principle
similar
data
could be obtained
from FTICR studies
some means
were
available
control
temperature of
the reaction
cell
and main
chamber
(Figure
2-1).
Unfortunately,
in the determination
of AG
a
for the metal
complexes
reported here,
such a
facility was
not available
and entropy
changes
could not
be measured.
Despite
the general
lack of
experimental
data
for gas-phase electron
attachment
entropies
for coordination
complexes,
data
are
available
from
other
sources.
Estimates
for certain
couples
can be obtained
from
statistical
thermodynamics
calculations
when
there are
sufficient
structural
vibrational
data.
example,
Lowenschuss
and Marcus102
have
used
statistical
mechanics
calculations
to calculate
standard gas-phase entropies
large
number of
polyatomic
ions,
including the members
of the
redox
couples
IrC63-"2/
Another
source of
data
for entropy
changes
involving
reduction
of metal
complexes
electrochemical
changes
from
values
for half-cell
redox
studies
by using
couples
of the temperature d
Scyclic voltammetry.
involving
several
ependence of
Entropy
octahedral
tris
chelate
complexes
have been
obtained
in the
laboratories
of Weaver
and co-workers,
103-105
These
studies
have
been
primarily
concerned
with
relationship between
the rate of
electron
transfer
processes
between
metal
centers
to the overall
in solution and
driving
force of
the enthalpic
reaction.
entropic
Entropy
contributions
changes
redox
half-cells
consistent
with
(ASrc0)
the sta
obtained
by the cyclic voltammetry method
tionary electron
convention
are
for dealing with
entropies
electron
of electron attachment
in the reduction originates
to gas-phase molecules,
from
the electrode
since
cannot
considered
as an "electron
Comparison o
for a particular
f data
for gas-phase
redox couple
leads
and solution-phase entropy
to the separation of the ob
changes
served
entropy
change
in solution
into an
intramolecular
contribution,
plus
contribution
from
solvent
polarization.
Such
comparisons
can not
only
provide
electron
considerable
attachment
insight
to gas-phase
into the magnitudes of
coordination
entropy
complexes,
changes
also
lead
to a greater understanding
of the role of
the solvent
in determining the
overall
change
in entropy
for a particular
redox
couple.
Presented here
are the results
statistical mechanics
calculations
of the entropy
changes
involved
for electron attachment
some gas-
phase octahedral
complexes.
The examples
given
are for complexes
that
form stable
redox
couples
in solution.
__ t- i2-
Calculations
are
repeated
- J f
and Fe(CN) 4/3"
B
performed
WCI 6
data
for the
aions
. Comparisons
obtained
here
in the couples
are made,
where
and the experimental
Ru (NH3) 63+/2+
possible,
data
, CO(NH) 3+/2+
between
reported
the theoretical
in the
literature.
insight
gained
used
to provide estimates
for the
gas-phase
entropy
M(hfac)3
changes
that
occur
for electron
attachment
to M(
acac)3
complexes.
Statistical
Gas-Phase
Redox Couples
Mechanics Applied to
Intramolecular
the Determination
Entropy Chanoes
Involving Complex Metal
Ions.
Electron attachment
to coordinated
transition metal
centers
is often
into
a metal
based molecular
orbital.
changes
in metal-ligand
bonding that
vibrations,
result
change
can shift
the moment
the frequencies
of inertia of
of metal-ligand
the molecule
skeletal
shifting
metal-ligand bond
lengths
and change ground
state
electronic
degeneracies.
These
internal
rearrangements
redistribute
internal
energy
change
solvent
of the molecule or
(gas)0).
ion and lead
total
can be expressed as
vibrational
electronic
change
an intramolecular
in entropy
sum of
entropy
in the
translational,
contributions
entropy
absence of
rotational,
(eq 4-1)
AS,(gas)0
= As
trans)0
+ ASi(rot)0
+ AS1(vib)0
+ AS (elec)0
contributions
AS1 (trans)0
, ASi (vib)0
, etc.
for ideal
gases
can be
evaluated by
Thermodynamic
using
the methods
functions
can be
of statistical
readily
thermodynamics.
calculated
from
appropriate
partition
function
Svib'
etc.)
which
a summation over
available energy
states
that
are thermally populated,
4-2.
( qt rans'
value of
q in eq
4-2 at
a given
temperature
is dependent
on the
degeneracy
of the energy
states,
and the energy
separations
between
states,
The term k
is the Boltzmann
constant.
The general
express
sion for the
rotational,
vibrational
electronic entropies
a system of
ideal
gaseous
particles
given
4-3.
(E-E0)
+ R lnq 4-3
values
of AS4(rot)0
, AS4(vib)0
and AS
elec)
for gas-phase
electron
attachment
Si(rot)
to a molecule can be
, S(vib)
and S
-(elec)
found
for both
from eq
4-3 by
the oxidized
calculating
and reduced
species and
obtaining the difference between
the values
for each
species
the two
STo evaluate the
terms on
is the thermal
energy
various
right of
and may
contributions
eq 4-3
also be
must
to ASi (gas)0
be evaluated.
separated
into
, therefore,
The term
(E-E0)
(E-E0) trans'
(E-EO)rot,
partition
etc.
Thermal
energies
function given by eq
are calculated
from the
appropriate
4-4.
(E-E0) -RT2 dln
a dT
In statistical
thermodynamics
calculations of
entropies,
expressions
treating the
oscillators.
accuracy of
used
for AS (rot)0
complex as
a rigid
and ASi(vib)0
rotor
Corrections can be made,
the calculations is small
are
approximations
and the normal modes
but the
improvements
are not included
based
as harmonic
in the
in the
discussion
here.
The contributions
from ASi(trans)0
rot)0
Chances
In Translational
Entropyv
The tr
particular
particles.
anslational
entropy
temperature and
a system of
volume
Electron attachment
related
to a molecule
ideal
particles
to the mass
of the
has a negligible
effect
the mass
the resulting
change
in AS
(trans)0
is also negligible.
evaluate
gas)0
, therefore,
no consideration need be given
AS. (trans)0
However,
values
of gas-phase entropies
of single
ions
given
this
below
purpose.
for completeness
The values
and a
reported
value of
(trans)0
in the present
required
work are
given by the
Sackur-Tetrode equation given
Stan
trans
4-5.
/3
5( 2i-mkT T
--2
2 \lh2
m is the mass
of the particle
k is the
Boltzmann
constant,
is Plank's
constant
, V i
volume of
the gas
and N
Avagadro's
constant.
Chances
in Rotational
Entropy
The expression
is obtained by
substituting
the quantum
mechanical
expression
for rotational
energy
spacings
into eq
4-2.
Since
rotational
energy
space
ings
are very
small
compared
to kT,
summation
can be
replaced by
an integral.
The result
is given
4-6.
- 82 (IBC) 3/2(2xkT)3/2
oh2
Octahedral
molecules
are classed
as spherical
tops
three
principle moments of
inertia
are the
same.
term
4-6 is
are
r(
L
octahedral molecule.
Substitution
eq 4-6 into eq
4-4 yields
following expressions
for the rotational
thermal
energy
((E-Eo)rot)
mole
degree of
freedom.
[E-E0 rot
= RT/2
For all but
the lightest
ions
and molecules
the moment
of inertia
large
value
enough
of RT/2
that
the rotational
per degree of
thermal
freedom.
energy
attains
For molecules
with
its classical
a low moment
inertia
integral
summation
and must
4-2 cannot
be evaluated
be accurately
either manually,
replaced by
or by using the Euler
Maculaurin
summation
formula.
For this
case the
thermal
energy of
is slightly
less
than
the value
4-7.
For molecules
rotational
3RT/2
applies
such as
freedom
to both
octahedral
the thermal
energy
the oxidized
complexes
is 3RT/2
and reduced
that
have
Since
complex,
degrees
value of
only
ARln
4-3 contributes
to ASi
rot)0
Substituting
eq 4-6 into eq
4-3 gives
an express
ion for AS
roto
for electron attachment
to octahedral
molecules
, eq
- 1i (Inc( (ed)-I c(ox)
( 8xkT
\ 2 )
terms
IABC (red)
and IABC
3(ox)
are the moments
of inertia
for the
reduced
and oxidized metal
complex
respectively.
In Figure
4-1 a plot
is shown
of the
rotational
entropy
, given by eq
4-3,
for the molecules MF6,
MC16
and MBr6
as a function
of increasing
distance
at 298 K.
It can be
seen
that
all the
plots
are
AStor
the plots
is close to
at 2
A and
varies
little over the
range
shown.
This
sets
an approximate upper
limit
of AS-(rot)0
- 0.6
cal mol
for octahedral metal
complexes
precise
value
can be calculated
from eq
4-8.
For the complexes
considered
in thi
chapter the M-L
bond
lengths
required
literature
data
for the evaluation
sources
are from X-ray
of rotational
and the data are given
crystallography
studies
entropies
in Table
except
were
4-1.
W-Cl
obtained
bond
bond
from
length
length
in WC16,
which
was obtained
in the ga
s-phase by
an electron
diffraction
study.
Values
are not available
for the M-L distances
in IrCl6
WC16
values
given
for the
ions
in Table 4-1
are estimated
values,
obtained by
adding 0.05
to the
values
for IrCl6
WCl5
respectively.
For both
ions the
electron
in the
lower
oxidation
state
complex
accommodated
in the
t2g non-bonding
orbital
set.
Where
structural
data
are available,
this
change
in M-L bond
length
is typical
ions
that
are stable
in oxidation
states
of similar
electronic
configuration.
these estimates
The error
is small.
introduced
in the
value
For the hexacyanoferrate
for AS (rot)0
from
complexes
rotational
entropy was
calculated
considering
each
cyano
group as
having
an atomic mass
of 26.02
amu and
situated
at the
average distance
of the C
and N
atoms
from the metal
center
(see
Table
4-1)
ammine
complexes,
rotational
entropies were
calculated
from an
effective M-L
bond
mass
distance obtained
amu.
by treating the
ammine group as
The effective M-L distance was
calculated
a single
atom of
from
appropriate M-N
and N-H bond
lengths
given
in Table
4-1.
for MX6
Table
4-1.
Metal-Lipand
Bond LenQths
in Metal
Complexes.
Complex
IrC162-
IrC1 3-
WCl6
WCl6
Co(N16 )
Co(NH3);
Bond Length/A
(M-L)
(M-L)
.307a8
.357 0
(M-L)
(M-L)
(M-N)
(N-H)
(M-L)
.114e
.010g
.173h
Co(NH3
(M-L)
(N-H)
(M-L)
8Values
taken
.936'
.010g
.995h
from ref.
Complex
Fe(CN)6
(M-C)
(C-N)
Fe(CN)6
(M-C)
(C-N)
Ru(NH3)6
(M-N)
(N-H)
(M-L)
Bond Length/A
.936a
.191a
.9008
.138a
.144f
.010g
.203h
NH3)6
(M-N)
(N-H)
(M-L)
.104f
.010*
.163h
Value
CValue
value
value
estimated by
in gas-phase
estimated by
fValue of
Value of
hEffective
distance
distance
distance
value
adding 0
from ref
adding
.05 A
value for IrCl6
(see
text)
107.
.05 A
to value
for WCl6
from
from
from
center
mass
calculated
from M-N
and N-H
distances.
.26c
.31d
29-
28-
27
26-
'i
o 245
'*24
- 23-
0
22,
21
20,
1.8
Slope
2.98
1.9 2.0 2.1 2.2 2.3 2.4 2.5
- MBr6
-MCI6
2.MF6
2.6
M-L
Distance/A
Resulting values
Table
, with
of rotational
values
entropies
the total
for the
standard
complexes
gas-phase
are given
entropies,
ASi(gas)0
Chances
in Vibrational
Entropyov
expression
given
in eq
1
m
1-e -x
Vibrational
summation
given
energy
in eq
spacings
4-2 can not be
from a binomial
are typically
replaced by
expansion
larger than
an integral.
In eq
kT and
Equation
term x
4-9 the
hcu/kT,
in which
U is
the frequency
of the
vibrational mode
C iS
speed
can be
of light.
found by
vibrational
substituting
thermal
energy per
into eq
4-3.
degree of
result
freedom
is given
4-10.
[E-Eo
vib
x RT
ex-1
x*"
4-10
Since
the magnitude of
vibrational
energy
spacings
are typically
close
or larger than
value of
(E-EO)vib
some
fraction of
RT per
mol,
occur
per degree of
on electron
freedom.
attachment
Changes
cause
in vibrational
a change
frequencies
that
in both
and both
terms on
the right
4-3 therefore
contribute
to ASi(vib)0
Substituting
the expressions
for (E-E0)vib
into
-4 gives
expression
for As.(vib)0
4-11
w r,[
xR Xo
,_ 1
1
If
|1
E-E)Ovib
n n
R
5.5
5.0
4.5
4.0
3.5
I
2.0
- 2.5
o
o
01.5
1.0
0.5
0.0
0 200 400 600 800 1000ob
1200
Vibrational freq./cm
oxidized and
reduced
species,
the frequencies
of which are
included
The definitions
and x0
are the
same
as that
given
but apply to the
reduced and
oxidized
species
respectively
The vibrational
characteristics
of metal
complexes
suggests
that
vibrational
entropy
changes
can be
significant
in certain
cases.
Figure
4-2 vibrational
entropy
is plotted as
a function
of vibrational
frequency
at 298 K.
It can be
seen
that
S,(vib)
increases
dramatically
as the
frequency
a vibrational mode decreases.
For
organometallic
coordination
compounds,
vibrations
associated
with metal-ligand
skeletal modes
are typically
in the
range of
100-700
-1. Shifts
these
frequencies,
oxidation
state at
of the magnitude
the metal
center,
that
can
occur
cause
for a change
significant
in formal
changes
entropy
vibrational mode,
especially
at low frequencies.
Moreover,
a non-linear molecule has
3N-6
vibrational
modes
(where N
is the
number
of atoms
in the molecule)
For MX
octahedral
complexes
there
therefore
a total
of 15 skeletal
vibrations
that
enter
into
summation
4-11.
Vibrational
frequencies used
to calculate the
vibrational
entropies
for the
complexes
considered
in thi
chapter
are given
in Tables
4-2 to
4-4.
assumption
is used
throughout
that
vibrational
frequencies
reported,
observed
in solution and
in the solid
state,
are
same
their
gas-phase values.
Since
a small
dependency
on the polari
zing
nature of
counter
ions
observed
for solid
state
spectra,
solution-
phase data
are used
wherever possible.
The only
frequencies
used
that
are obtained
from solid
state
spectra
are for the
IR active Tu modes.
These
possible
are the only
skeletal modes
IR active vibrations
for MX6
complexes
and account
for 6
12 of the
33 possible
S 0 0 0
are
* -
1
Table
4-2.
Assignments
Hexachloride Metal
of~~ ~ ~ Virrn( rrin aIi1'
Complexes
IrCl6'
IrCl6
a 353
WC16a 437
WCl6
aFrequencies
taken
from ref
111.
bThe T2 bend
16 "J6-12),
a infrared
see text.
and Raman
inactive;
value obtained
from
CFrequencies
taken
from ref.
112.
dValue
from
ref.
113.
129b
c^m~1\
of Vibrational
Fre uencies
139b
168d
Table
Metal
4-3.
Assignments
of Vibrational
Frequencies
(cm~1)
for Hexacvano
Complexes
Fe(CN
Skeletal M-C
Vibrations
M-C-N
Vibrations
C-N
Vibrations
2136
2136
2105
Fe(CN)6
Skeletal M-C
Vibrations
M-C-N
Vibrations
C-N
Vibrations
2080
2048
2033
351b
381b
350b
402b
Table 4-4.
Metal
ComIol
Assignments
of Vibrational
Frequencies
fcmn 1)
in Hexammine
exes
NH3) 6
Skeletal M-N
Vibrations
Ammonia
Rocking
Vibrations
788c
788c
Ru(NH3)6
Skeletal M-N
Vibrations
Ammonia
Rocking
769c
769c
769c
170e
270e
170e
270e
175b
788c
409d
120b
190b
Table 4-4
continued.
Co ( NH3 ) 63' a
Skeletal
Vibrations
Ammonia
Rocking
Vibrations
Co(NH3)62+,a
Skeletal M-N
Vibrations
830c
830c
187f
Ammonia
Rocking
Vibrations
654c
654c
654c
aFrequencies
taken
from ref
balue
for 06 obtained
from
6 = U5(2"1/2)
see text.
CT and T
value may
as the T
rocking vibrations
* unavailable. Fre
mode given
in ref.
are infrared
quencies
given
and Raman
inactive
are assumed
to be the
Tsme
dime
116.
Only
available
frequency
, from
, others
estimated.
228b
132b
__
k
limit
placed
on all estimated
frequencies
is 10%.
The most
potentially
serious
error
in the calculation of
vibrational
entropies
comes
from the estimated
frequency
of the inactive
skeletal
bending
mode.
The frequency
of this mode
is typically
in the
region
or so and any uncertainty produces
a large error
in the
vibrational
entropy
(see
Figure
4-2)
For most
the complexes
in Tables
4-2 to 4-
the skeletal
Tu mode was
obtained
from the
relationship
relationship
correctly predict
predicted
values
theoretically
some XY6
and has been
compounds
shown
in which
central
atom has
a closed
shell
electronic
configuration.
octahedral
transition metal
hexafluorides,
for which
is available
from combination bands
relationship
is generally
or resonance
observed
phosphorescence
to hold
to within
spectra, t
the error
limits
10% given
here.
Ru(NH3)6
data
not been reported,
for the
except
frequencies of
for the Tu mode
(see
skeletal modes
Table
have
4-4)
frequencies
given
Table
4-4 are estimations
based
on calculations
observed
frequencies
for other
hexaammine complexes of
ions.
addition
to the skeletal modes
given
for the
hexaammine
complexes
Table
4-4,
frequencies
are reported
for the
ammine
ligand N-H
rocking
vibrations.
Unlike
skeletal
modes,
these
frequencies
are
available
for Ru(NH3)62.+ 116
The N-H rocking vibrations
are
the only
other
vibrations
of low enough
frequency to contribute
significantly to
vibrational
entropy
for these complexes.
There
are a total
of 12 modes
and T2 )
of which only the
and T2g modes
are
infrared
Raman
inactive.
These
frequencies
are observed at
830cm
respectively
for Co(NH3)63
but only the
infrared
active
Tu modes
1/2)
are
= u5(
(Tlg,
Chances
in Electronic
EntroDv
Electronic energy
separations
are usually
large
compared
to kT
exponential
term
4-2 is therefore close
zero
usually
equal
to the degeneracy
the ground
electronic
state
maximum possible degeneracy
an electronic
state
is given by
product
of the
total
spin
and orbital
degeneracies.
required
information
carried
in the
spectroscopic term
symbol
for the
state.
Under the octahedral
symbol
point
group the orbital
singly degenerate
, doubly
degeneracy
degenerate;
denoted by
, triply
degenerate.
total
spin
degeneracy
(multiplicity
given by
2S+1
where
S is the
total
spin
angular momentum and
is denoted
in the
superscript
preceding the orbital
symbol.
spectroscopic
term
symbols
the metal
for octahedral
d orbitals
complexes
in an
are derived
octahedral
ligand
purely
field.
from
symmetry of
In reality
, the
degeneracy of
the electronic
ground
state
a particular
complex
can be
split
of the
n energy
complex
The extent
the nature of
the splitting
the electronic
depends
state
on the
structure
itself.
ground
state
electronic
degeneracy
of the complex may therefore
be less
than
value
suggested by the
spectroscopic
term symbol,
since
it is
dependent
on the thermal
population
the energetically
split
states.
There
are two
principle effects
that
contribute
to the
splitting
orbital
degeneracies,
spin-orbit
coupling
and distortions
from perfect
octahedral
symmetry.
Spin-orbit
couplin.
coupling of
spin
and orbital
angular
moment
of the d
electrons
results
a splitting of
electronic
degeneracy
For A and E ground
states
there
no orbital
angular
momentum
consequently
no spin
-orbit
coupling
For T ground
states
qetec
state,
value of
the Racah
electronic
repulsion
parameter
the magnitude of
ligand
field
(10Dq)
For second
third
metals
the effect
is greater
and orbital
splitting
are generally
in the
range
of 500 5000
Distortions
from octahedral
symmetry.
Molecules
that
have orbitally
degenerate ground
states
have
a tendency to
physically
distort
to move
to a
state of
lower
energy
and lower
symmetry,
removing the
orbital
degeneracy
Jahn-Teller
of the state.
theorem.
119,120
This
statement
The effect
a simplified
is observed
form of
to occur
octahedral metal
ground state
complexes
not purely
For example,
octahedral
Ti(H20) 6
and the
which
has a 2Tg
orbitals
are
split
into a
set of bl,
states.
single electron
resides
in the lowest
energy
orbital.
Similarly,
for ions
such
, a pure octahedral
ligand
field
would
produce
a degenerate
of orbitals
containing three electrons.
From experiment,
the orbitals
found
to be split
such
that
the unpaired
electron
resides
a state
single
orbital
degeneracy.
The magnitude of
the orbital
splitting
typically
in the
range of
about
several
hundred
wave
numbers
up to
about
2000
(observed
for Cu2+
complexes)
so are comparable
to the
magnitudes
complexes
of splitting
symmetry)
due to spin-orbit
a trigonal
distortion
coupling.
is possible
tris-chelate
if the
"bite
angle"
of the ligand
not precisely
In this
case,
the degenerate
set (octahedral
symmetry
is split
into a
set of
orbitals.
set in octahedral
symmetry.
M(acac)3
An example of
complexes
has been
symmetry remains
the degree of
reported
a doubly
trigonal
Co(acac)3
degenerate
splitting
E set in
crystal
structure of
Co(acac)3
reveals
an average O-Co-O bite
angle
of 97.3
A'
. S 1 -.
row
are
+ eg
q
4R
The geometry
of the complex
in the gas-phase
has not been
reported.
The entropy
an electronic
state can
be evaluated
from
4-3.
the absence of
a thermally
acce
ssible
higher
lying
states,
entropy
of a ground
degeneracy
states
of the
electronic s
of the ground
is possible,
thermal
tate
is given by
state.
the entropy
population
If thermal
of the
of the split
= R In
population
state must
states;
where g
of higher
be considered
that
the
lying
in terms
electronic
partition
function
(qetec)
must
be evaluated.
An orbitally
split
state
that
can be
thermally populated
will
also
posess
a thermal
energy
((E-Eo) etec)
This
thermal
energy must
also be
considered when
evaluating the entropy
of the state
, as defined by equation
4-3.
example of
the relationship between
the entropy
an electronic
state
and the
splitting of
temperatures
AE = 0
is given
entropy
the degeneracy
in Figure
given by
of the
state
4-3 for the example of
= R In
and for a 2E
an energy
a 2E
state
at two
state
this
equal
shown
to R In 4
75 cal
in Figure
mol"
As AE
splitting of
increases
value
state
gelec'
given by
approaches
+ e-ERT),
a value of
rapidly decreases
R In
(1.38
and R
cal mol
rapidly
as shown
in Figure 4-3
AE > 0
approaches
thermally
(E-Eo) etec
as AE becomes
accessible.
increases
so large
value of
, reaches
that
(E-EO)elec
a maximum
upper
value,
state
and then
no longer
is given by
+ e(AERT))]
AE and has been
shown by
Lias
and Ausloos92c
reach
a maximum of
-0.2
kcal
mol-1
for a 2E
state.
contribution
the entropy
is given
from
(E-E0)etec/T,
which
is also
shown
in Figure
overall
effect
on the entropy
of the
state
is that
it also
converges
on the value of
R In
, but retains
a significant
amount
= 2(
qelec
qe te
[(e(-AE/RT)) /
350
298
U-
R Inq
(R
(E-Eo)/'T
- -
a- -t
- a-
C--
0 200
a
e-...
=
splitting.
states is
At absolute
possible
zero
no thermal
and the entropy
of the
population
state
of higher
given
lying
the
degeneracy of
lowest
lying
state.
Assess
inar the entropies
of electronic .round
states.
combined
effects
give
of spin-orbit
a characteristic
coupling
splitting
and distortions
of electronic
from octahedral
symmetry
degeneracy
particular metal
complex that
dependent
on the metal
ion,
oxidation
state
and the nature of
coordinated
ligand.
Since
energy
spacings
are typically
on the order
of magnitude
of kT,
a range
of states
in the electronic manifold
can be thermally populated,
depending
on the
resulting
energy
spacings
and the temperature.
increasing population
particularly manifest
susceptibility
of higher
lying
states
with
temperature
in the temperature dependence of
transition metal
the magnetic
complexes.
In Table
4-5,
estimates
are given
for the
change
in electronic
entropy
for the redox
couples
containing the
octahedral
ions
cons
idered
here.
For the
complexes with A and E
ground
states,
the orbital
angular
momentum
spin-orbit
electronic
function
orbital
is quenched
coupling.
state was
equal
and so the electronic
For A ground
estimated by
to the spin
degeneracy may
be split
states,
degeneracy
therefore,
assuming that
degeneracy.
by distortions
is not split
the entropy
the electronic
For E ground
partition
states,
from octahedral
symmetry.
The entropy of
state depends on
the thermal
population
of the
upper
state.
separation
As shown
in Figure
between
4-3,
states
for typical
, the
upper
values
state
of the
can be
energy
accessible
ordinary
temperatures.
Since the
energy
spacings
between
split
states
are not known,
the entropy of
E states was
estimated
from
Table 4-5
Electronic
Entropy Chanqes
For Redox Couples.
Change in
Electronic
Redox
Couple
Ground
State
soln)
(elec)'
.78 1
IrCl6
WCl60
(soln)
(soln
-1.78 1
1 -0.58 2
Co (NH3 ) 63+/2+
Ru (NH3) 63+/2+
(soln)
(soln)
1 2
1 -1
.48 2
.78 1
Sc(acac)
acac
V(acac)
Cr(acac)
Mn(acac)
Fe(acac)
acac)
(gas)
"(gas)
(gas)
.78 1
.41 3
.58 2
.15 0
.34 0
0/-(gas)
(gas
(gas)
.87 + 2
.48 2
(gas)
8Values
are
convention.
in cal mol"1
Entropy of
Calculated
the free
electron
ox + e
- red
is not included
in the
'e(CN)63-/4-
-, 3T
- 4T
2T2
-* 3TI
4 A2
- 5E
-, 6A1
- 4T1
states
split
spin-orbit
coupling
can have
a lower
degeneracy than
spin
degeneracy122
and a realistic evaluation
of the
range of
values
the electronic partition
function
is difficult
to estimate.
For the
complexes
that
have
ground
states
in Table
4-5,
the electronic
entropy
estimated
from a
value
the partition
function
taken
as the
average of
appropriate
to the maximum degeneracy of
term symbol.
Estimates of
state,
electronic
as given by the
energy
spacings,
hence
the electronic
partition
function,
can be obtained
from matching
the observed
complex
temperature dependence of
to the theoretical
temperature
the magnetic
dependence,
susceptibility
derived
from
theoretical
energy
spacings,
but such
data
are scarce.
Comparison
of Solution-Phase
Redox
Couples
and Gas-Phase Entropy
Involving Octahedral
Metal
Changes
Complexes
for Some
Entropy Chanaes
for Solution-Phase Redox Couples
The experimental method
for obtaining
entropy
changes
for half-cell
redox
couples
involves
the use
of cyclic
voltammetry
in a non-thermal
cell
arrangement
that
permits
temperature of
half-cell
containing
the redox couple of
interest
to be varied,
while the
temperature of
the other
half-cell,
containing the
reference
electrode
is held
constant.
The method
provides
a simple means
to evaluate
difference between
the absolute
ionic
entropies
of the
reduced and
oxidized
halves
of the couple
given
AS,
0
- Srad -
4-12
Interpretation
of entropy
changes
for redox
couples
involving
was
complex
ion.
However,
dielectric
continuum models
have not
provided
adequate description
of observed
o values.
In particular,
anomalous
entropy
changes
assoc
iated with
Co(III)/Co(II)
couples
comparison t
quantitative
for redox
mechanics,
estimated.
o analogous
explanation
couples
Ru(III)/Ru(II)
involving
intramolecula
y calculating
coordination
r and solvent
couples)
have evaded
intramolecular
complexes
satisfactory
entropy
by using
contributions
changes
state istical
to ASrc
can be
Several
values
have
been
determined by
various
workers
selection of
results
for various
redox
couples
are given
in Table
4-6.
solvent
for all redox
couples
in Table
4-6 is
water.
Also
given
in Table
4-6 are the
theoretical
values of
0 predicted by the
Born
equation
(ASBorn0).
Born equation124
is based
on a purely
electrostatic model
can be used
to obtain
the change
in free energy
entropy when a
charge
is transferred
from a
conducting
sphere
vacuum to
an identical
sphere
in a medium of
dielectric
constant
e (eqs
4-13
4-14).
AGnorn
- -_ 21--
2r\ e
4-13
AS Brn
- -P
^ BoX 1
" t aT ) p
- q2 1ne
2iTe 81nT J p
4-14
In eqs
4-13
4-14,
the charge on
the conducting
sphere
e iS
the dielectric
constant
of the medium.
When
the medium
water
at 25C
written
spheres
in the
are
ions
convenient
of absolute
forms of
charge
4-15
ze, eqs
4-13
4-14
can be
4-16.
Table
4-6.
Experimental
and Theoretical
Entropies
Redox Couples.
Redox Couple
ASBorn
0
ASBorn0)
A (M-La .)
D iasance
Ru (NH3) 63+/2+' C
Os(NH3)63+/2+
Co (NH3) 63+/2+
Ru(en)33
Co(en)33
Ru(H20)6
18.5
18 0
d 45
+/2+
13 0
37 2
3+/2+,c
38 3
14.6
14.6
14.6
13.0
13.0
14.6
14.6
CO(H20)3+/2+,d
Fe(H20)33+12+,b
bipy) 33+12+
14.6
28.4
c 1
-0.048f
Fe(bipy)33+12+,c
Co(bipy)33+/2+, c
Fe ( CN) 63" 14 -, c
22
-41.5
aAll
values
given
in cal mol
bata
CData
from ref
from ref
dFrom ref
eData
Data
103.
104.
. 105 (value estimated by
from Tabi
from ref.
authors)
4-1.
123.
.040e
0.178e
+/2+,b
-0.036e
ASforn
z2
- -9.649 -z-
r7A
cal mol-1
4-16
Born
equation
is most
successfully
applied
to large
approximately
solute/solvent
spherical
ions
interactions
of low charge,
are absent.
and where
For these
specific
ions,
the effect
changes
in size of
the ion with
changes
in the oxidation
state of
metal
the effect
of dielectric
saturation
are both minimized.
should be
noted
that
for the
reduction of
a complex
bearing
a positive
charge
bearing
sign
of ASBorn
a negative charge,
positive.
sign
For neutral
of ASBorn
complexes
is negative.
those
A more
positive entropy
can be associated
with
ions
of lower
charge,
since
there will
be less
"ordering"
of the surrounding
solvent
molecules.
Comparing the experimental
and theoretical
entropy
changes
for the
redox
couples
in Table
4-6,
it is
seen
that
there
is generally
a poor
agreement
between the
two values.
However,
the theoretical
value
serves
as a reference
point
to which
the experimental
values
can be
compared
absence of
specific
solute-solvent
interactions.
sign
magnitude of
information
the deviations
about
the nature and
of experimental
the extent
results
of the
from ASBorn
changes
o provide
in specific
solute-solvent
interactions
that
occur
on reduction
a particular
metal
complex.
The difference between
ASBorn
for each
couple
is included
in Table 4-6
for this
purpose.
It is particularly
interesting to
note
in Table
4-6 that
for the
couples
Ru (bipy) 3+/2+
(where bipy
'-bipyridine)
which
bonding,
the nature of
that
the M-L bonding
value of
is more
- ASBorn
complex
than
is negative.
simple
For each
of these
Fe(CN) 3-4-
energy match
with
ligand
r orbitals,
and subsequently
an overall
increase
in the degree of
and Weaver
to account
(M-L)
for the
bonding.
negative
A related
value
argument
of ASrc
was
used by
- ASBorn
the Ru(bipy)332
are in operation.
couple.
was suggested
The water molecules
close
that
to the
competing
effects
ruthenium center,
including
therefore
those
less
surrounding the
"ordered"
ligands,
in the lower
will
oxidation
be less
n state,
polarize
giving
rise to
positive
contribution
to ASr
However
, the water molecules
adjacent
to the bipyridine rings may experience
an increase
in polar
ization
going to
the Ru(II)
state
since
the added
electron
will
significantly delocalized
around
aromatic
rings,
acting to
increase
their
net charge den
sity.
The latter
contribution
would
give
a negative
contribution
to ASrc
An opposite
effect
was
used
'to describe
anomalously
large value of
for Co (bipy) 33+/2+
Co(III)
Co(II)
reactions
involve
the electronic
convers
ion t2g
- t29g
which
should minimize
the extent
of electron
delocaliz
action
in the
reduced
state
and therefore discourage
crease
solvent
polarization
the vicinity of
the bipyridine
rings.
Further,
the expansion
at the
metal
center was
suggested
to lead
an especially
large decrease
polarization
for the
negative
of nearby water molecules.
value of
- ASsBorn
It seems that
o for the Ru(bipy)33+/2+
e arguments
couple are
not without merit,
conceive.
since
The explanation
an alternative explanation
for the Co(bipy)33+/2
is difficult
couple may
questionable,
cal mol"1
however,
between
since
the large difference of
the Ru (bipy)33'+/2
and Co (bipy) 33+12+
approximately
couples
consistently
found
for other
couples
involving
reductions
at Ru(III)
CO(III)
centers where only
M-L
o bonding
is possible.
seems
that
Intramolecular
Contributions
to ASrc
rc-
Single
ion hydration
entropies
have
been
obtained
for many monatomic
polyatomic
ions
by evaluating the
entropy
change
for the
transference
a gas-phase
ion M of
charge
n to the
solution
phase
according to
the reaction
the reaction Mn(gas
- Mn(aq
) 125-128
value of
given by
AS (hyd
i (gas)
i(aq
4-17
o+ 6.35 cal mol-1 K-1
value of
6.35
cal mol-1 K-1
(R In 24.41)
arises
from the different
standard
Si(gas)0
states
and Si(aq)
for the gas-phase
for a particular
and the
solution
phase.
ion are typically
value of
quite
different,
value of
S1(aq) being
smaller
and often
negative.
Translational
freedom
is restricted
and it is uncertain how
rotational motion will
affected.
Also
the difference
polarization
in entropy of
of the solvent may
an ion between
contribute greatly to
phases.
Although
aq)
data
are available
for a large number
polyatomic
ions,
there
are apparently no
aq)
for ionic
reports
species
on comparisons made between ASi(gas)0
in redox
couples.
results
of the
calculations that
yield
gas-phase
entropies of
the octahedral
complexes
considered
in the
present
work are
presented
in Table
From
the results
of the calculations
it can be
seen
that
trans)0
same
within
for the oxidized
cal mol
and reduced
(Figure
4-1)
species,
that
Si (rot)0
can be anticipated
that
these
terms
will
also
remain
constant
between
the oxidized
and reduced
species
in solution.
Much
larger
differences
in entropy
can potentially
arise from S
vib)
and Si
elec)0
, and the
calculated
gas-phase
values
AS
- ASi(vib)
o + ASi(elec
0+ ASoolv
4-18
4-18,
ions
in the
ASsolv
redox
is the difference
couple.
There
in the entropy
are two situations
solvation
of the
where the
contribution
o to
can be
separated
from ASrc
so that
contributions
of large
radii
from AS.
, ASsoLv
vib)
and AS.(elec)0 may be estimated.
in water
predicted by the
Born
equation
ions
(4-16)
to be small
comparing
and therefore
two redox
couples of
= AS1(vib
different
+ AS4(elec)
metal
ions
Also,
when
coordinated by the
same
ligand,
and undergoing the
same
change
in oxidation
states,
Assolv
is constant
and AASrc
= AAS.(vib)0
+ AAS.(elec)0
It is illuminating to
calculations,
obtained
which
aqueous
compare the
are given
solution,
in Table
which
results of
4-7,
are given
gas-phase
to the experimental
in Table
4-6.
results
For the
ions that
form
the redox
couples
Ru (NH3) 63+12+
, IrC12"
, WCl6
the difference
in gas-phase entropies
is small
therefore
only
Ssolv0 will
ASi(gas)0
value of
= 17.8
gas)0
contribute
cal mol"1 E
can be
to ASrc.
For the Co(NH ) 3+/2+
The origin
traced
of the
to the difference
couple
comparatively
in spin
large
states
between
bonding
result
the oxidized
and reduced
significantly weakened
of the doubly
occupied
species.
relative
In Co(II)
to Co(III)
antibonding e metal
comply
exes
complexes
based
orbitals
the M-L
as a
in the
Co(II)
state.
As a result,
the skeletal
vibrational
modes
are shifted
to substantially
lower
frequencies
and a large
increase
in vibrational
entropy re
also gives
sults.
rise
The greater
a significa
electronic
nt increase
degeneracy
ASi(elec)0
of the Co(II)
(Table
state
4-6).
1wL I -. *
t I e~.
S U
Fe(CN) 3"/4"
C o
M -
1 0
w in
-4 9.-
o
rS Ca
to o
* .
0,4
OH-M
40 (^ r-4
,-* I
e1
0I I
CE
r-i |
I I
rEO u
+ +1"
(Ned
n9 (n -
(1,10-phen)
frequencies
observed at
complexes
of the
For Fe(bipy
384 and 367 cm-1
same metal
infrared
ion have
active M-N
For Fe(bipy)32+
similar M-L
vibrations
these
vibrational
are
frequencies
are
shifted
slightly to
386 and 376
respectively.
Co(1,10-phen)3
similar
frequencies
to these
are observed at
378 and
cm-1,130 but
frequencies
for Co(bipy)3
are shifted to
at 266 and 228 cm"1
Large
substantially
contributions
lower
to vibrational
entropy
can be generally
expected
for cobalt
couples
that
undergo
same change
vibrational
reduced
in spin
stat
frequencies
species
are
e, although a
that
required
complete
are different
set of data
between
to quantitatively
for all the
the oxidized
evaluate As
(vib)
all the
same
redox
spin
couples
change
involving Co(III)/Co(II)
involved
and values
reductions
for As rc
are
in Table
constantly
25 cal mol
higher than
corresponding Ru(III)/Ru(II)
couples.
The difference
and Ru(NH3)+2
15.4
in the values of
obtained
cal mol1
intramolecular
ASi (gas)0
for the
from the calculations
result
entropy
changes
demonstrates
for Co(III)/Co(II)
couples
Co(NH3)63/2
in the present
importance of
redox
work
couples,
offers
a feasible explanation
and Co(III)/(II
of the large differences
redox
couples
studied
in ASrc
aqueous
for the
solution.
Relationship
Between
Free Enercv
and Enthalov of
Gas-Phase Electron Attachment
to M(acac)3
and M(hfac)3
Complexes
The electron
attachment
energies
quoted
for the M(acac)3
M(hfac)3
at 350 K.
complexes
The data
in the present
would
serve a
work are
wider
free energies
range of
(AG )
obtained
applications
I- harmnr~hom nr Ae0 RnA AR0 nan I A ha nhl- ni nail n* al-bar
if vanluia nf
Ru(III)/(II)
A o n/I AW 0
data.
Values
for AH
at 298.15
K can be
readily
combined
energy
cycles
with
compiled
data
for other
processes.
The relationship between
an experimental
temperature
(Texp)
and AHl
a
and AG0
different
temperature
is given
in equations
4-19
4-20
AG (T
- AG(T
+ AS0 [Texp
T
- Cp(M)dT+
T
T1
fCp(M-) dT
T
4-19
AH (T)
- AG(Te,
+TexpAS
T
f Cp (M) dT
T
T
fCp(M-) dT
T
4-20
It is often assumed
that
temperature dependence
and AS
electron
attachment
or ionization
a neutral molecule
is negligible
For example,
for electron
= the electron
used by
capture
affinity
Kebarle to quote electron
a species
affinities
M to
form M ;
equation
E organic
4-20
AGe(0
been
compounds,
neglecting
the integral
terms.
Lias
and Ausloos92c
have explored
validity
of this
assumption by performing
statistical
thermodynamics
calculations
on several
organic
and inorganic
compounds
from
spectroscopic data.
As shown
above,
and stated more explic
itly
Lias
and Ausloos, t
energy between
he difference
a species M a
in translational
nd its ion (M o:
and rotational
r M')
thermal
is negligible.
Differences
can only
arise
from
(E-Eo)vib
(E-EO)etec
Under the
convention
volume of
the electron
zero
so for electron
attachment
AP =AV
= 0.
Therefore,
- Cp
and AE
= AH.
Lias
Ausloos
showed
difference
that
between
from the compounds
adiabatic
they
ionization
studied,
potential
largest
enthalpy
of ionization of
enthalpy
at 350
arose
for ethylene,
which
a a- o 1 -
4-20
can be
expected
to be significantly
greater than
absolute
magnitude of
sum of
the integral
terms.
From
calculations given
above
for pairs of
octahedral
transition metal
complex
ions
that
form
redox
couples
(Table
4-7)
can be
seen
that
where
acceptor
orbital
is a non-bonding metal
is 3
cal mol -1
This
value
is comparable
determined
capture
From the
to the organic
experimental
the M(acac)3
results
of the
compounds
for which As a
can be expected
and M(hfac)3
calculations
to apply
complexes of
given
in Table
Sc, Ti,
been
for electron
V and
4-7, for the gas-
phase
Co (NH3 ) 63+/2+
couple a
larger value
of ASao
cal mol"1
obtained
, which
was
attributed
a consequence
of the difference
in d
electron
difference
Co(acac)3
range of
electron
configuration between
in electronic
the oxidized
configuration
Co(hfac)3
20 cal mol"1
capture
results
couples
For the
acac
in the following
and reduced
is expected
and ASa may
and hfac
changes
forms.
to exist
also
complexes
same
for the
be in the
of Cr and Mn
in d electron
configuration;
Cr t2g
-t29
Mn, t2g
In each
case the
additional
electron
is accommodated
in the antibonding
set and
be in the
range of
- 20 cal mol"1
Conclusions
results
of the
calculations
presented
here demonstrate
importance of
intramolecular
entropy
changes that
occur
on electron
attachment
to coordination
complexes.
For solution-phase
redox
couples,
intramolecular
entropy
changes
are generally
smaller
than
entropy
change occurring
in the surrounding
solvent
However,
in special
cases
was
-t2g
such
as the Co(III)/(II)
changes
redox
contribute
couple,
even
couples
considered
significantly to
lons
of quite
here,
the total
small
radii.
intramolecular
entropy
In the
change
case
entropy
for the
of redox
couples
involving
large
ions
such
as Co(bipy)33+/2+
differential
solvation
effects
are expected
to be
relatively
small
probably
change.
cal mol-
be attributed
almost
For example,
and 22 cal mol
entirely to
for [
-1 K-1
Fe(bipy)3]
in water,
an intramolecular
3+/2+
entropy
[Co(bipy)3]3+/2+
respectively.
Although
extensive calculations
of the vibrational
partition
functions
cannot
carried
-20 cal mol
view of
out for these
-1 K-1
ions
difference
changes
in M-N
to the
in the ASr
stretching
lack of
o values
(and
spectroscopic data,
is understandable
presumably bending
frequencies
that
occur
for these two
couples.
Essentially no
change
vibrational
frequencies occurs
for (Fe(bipy)3 ]3++
while
frequency
change
for [Co(bipy)3]3]+2+
couple
amounts
an average
-130
insight
changes
that
gained
has enabled rough
occur
from the
calculations
estimates
for gas-phase electron
to be made
attachment
for intramolecular
for the entropy
to the
entropy
changes
transition metal
1-diketonate complexes
investigated
in this
study.
can
are
CHAPTER
METAL-LIGAND
FOR GAS-PHASE
BOND
ENERGIES
TRANSITION METAL
AND SOLVATION
ENERGIES
TRIS(ACETYLACETONATE
COMPLEXES
AND THEIR ANIONS
Introduction
There
have been
several
attempts
to determine
average
homolytic
and heterolytic
M-0 bond energies
in M(acac)3
complexes.
most
reliable
are obtained
through a
thermochemical
cycle based
on the
enthalpy of
calorimetry.
hydrolysis
the complexes,
In the auxiliary thermochemical
obtained by using
data required
reaction
in the
cycle,
value
for the
homolytic
bond
enthalpy
of the enolic O-H bond
in acetylacetone
introduces
the greatest
uncertainty,
since no
experimental
data
is available.
From
the results of
thermal
gas-phase
charge-transfer
reactions
involving
acac
Sions
presented
here,
proton
of this
affinity
acac
bond energy.
previously
reported,
From the original
reaction
a new estimate
calorimetry
can be made
data,
better
estimates
heterolytic
bond
can
then be made
energies
for M(ac
for the average
ac)3 complexes.
e M-O
This
homolyti
s data,
combined
with
the gas-phase electron attachment
data
for the M(acac)3
complexes
and the free gas-phase
ion,
leads
to the
average
heterolytic
bond
energies
in the corresponding M(acac)3
Sions.
Several
the M(acac)3
complexes
for which
electron
attachment
data
were obtained
also exhibit
reversible
electrochemical
behavior
one electron
reduction.
From El2
data,
estimates
can be made of
single
a 1 a 4. aA a a -. A 1 a fl ante a --- I .L. t.
L -- A L --
^ _- _< _
essential for
processes at
contributions
a complete
understanding
coordinated metal
of the changes i
of the
centers.
n solvation
thermodynamics
Consideration
energies
of th
and bond
of redox
e relative
energies
that
occur
for electron
attachment
to M(acac)3
complexes
provides
overall
related
appreciation of
to the magnitude of
how ionization
a particular
potentials
M(acac)3
M+3(g)
redox
ions
are
couple.
Electron Attachment
Enerov Relationships
The general
thermochemical
cycle
in Figure
5-1 is the basis
most
of the
thermochemical
results
presented
in this
report.
The cycle
shows
the general
functions
thermochemical
for M-L bond
formation
relationships between
or solvat ion
thermodynamic
a complex
electron attachment
three
thermodynamics
physically different
(AXa)
environments
for a metal
(reactions
ion in essentially
b and
given
temperature.
A cycle of
this
type
and crude estimates of
various
thermodynamic quantities
were discussed by
Buckingham and
Sargeson
some
years
ago.
In reaction
electron
attachment
to a metal
ion M with
charge
z in the free gaseous
state,
MZ(g
electron
attachment
is to the gas-phase
complex
of charge
n in which
the metal
ion M
is equivalently
ligated by
anionic
ligands
In (c)
solvated metal
complex
is reduced
to (MLy]n-1(soln)
For the M(acac)3
complexes
considered
here,
L=acac,
= 3,
= 0.
In the
upper
part
of Figure
, labelled
the difference
for the electron
attachment
reactions
(a) and (b),
given by
AXao[MZ(g
and AX[ MLyn(g)
are thermochemically related
to the
= +3,
W.>.
J
In the
part
of the cycle
labelled
II the difference
in AXa
for the
electron
attachment
reactions
AXa [(MLyn(g
and AXao[MLyLn(soln)]
thermochemically related
to the difference
between AX
solvation
the oxidized
and reduced
forms of
the complex
AXso v[MLY
AXsotv [MLy
(n-1)])
Experimental
ionization
results
of a neutral
for reaction
or electron
usually
attachment
involve
a neutral.
incorporate
the energies
for these
processes
into
thermochemical
cycles,
the values must be determined
under thermal
conditions.
Such
data
be obtained by using mass
spectrometry through
studies
of electron-
transfer
equilibrium reactions
and are often
used
to estimate
adiabatic
ionization
energies or
the electron
affinities
of polyatomic
species
(these quantities
of formation
The method
of the neutral a
d can be applied
strictly the
nd its ion at
equally well
differences between
as discussed
to reactions
the heats
in chapter
involving
positive or negative
ions,
but such
data
for metal
complexes
scarce.
Vertical
ionization
data
are more widely
available
for volatile metal
complexes
photoelectron
adiabatic
from studies of
spectroscopy
and vertical
ionization
(PES).
appearance
56,131
processes
potentials
The energy difference between
can be
relatively
small
if the
geometry
adiabatic
of the neutral
ionization
is similar to
energy
that
for ferrocene
ion.
has recently
been
example,
estimated
.69 eV by
FTICR133
(Mautner134
suggests
6.81
eV from
pulsed
high
pressure mass
spectrometry
studies),
while
vertical
IP value
obtained
from PES
6.88
Significant
differences between adiabatic
verti
cal energies
arise,
however,
when geometry
changes
upon
electron
attachment
can
7.0 eV
For metal
complexes,
therefore,
vertical
ionization
data
only
be used
in thermochemical
cycles
such
as Figure
5-1 for those
cases
where
it is known,
or can be
reasonably
assumed,
that
the geometries
the neutral
and the ion
are not too dissimilar.
It should be
noted
that
even
if the
0-0 transition
energy
(the
adiabatic energy)
can be obtained
from the
PES spectrum,
a statistical
mechanical
calculation must
be used
to derive enthalpy,
temperature. Spect
entropy,
and free
roscopic data
needed
energy
changes
for such
a given
calculations
are often
unavailable or
incomplete
for transition metal
complexes.
On the other
hand,
electron-transfer equilibrium
studies
provide data
that
can be
used
directly
in thermochemical
calculations
involving
ioni
zations
electron
attachments
near
room temperature.
Combining cas-phase electron
attachment
energi.es
with
other
thermochemical
data.
In order to
combine thermal
gas-phase
electron
attachment
energy data
for M(acac)3
complexes with
other thermochemical
data
it is useful
to know the
temperature dependence
of Ke
2-2)
since
such
data
leads
to values
of ASa
and AHa
Estimates
of AG
a
other
temperatures
can then be made.
From
the conclusions
drawn
from
chapter
concerning the magnitudes
of ASa0
for gas-phase
coordination
compounds,
a maximum
value of
= 20 cal mol'
for the
reaction
Co(acac)3(g)
- Co(acac)3
is assumed.
value
for AHa
a
at 298
K is
-7 kcal
mol"1
higher
than AG8
at 350 K (assuming
independent
of temperature).
For the other
M(acac)3
couples
where
less
change
in vibrational
and electronic
entropies occur,
ASaO
should
be smaller
Values
similar
for the
to the values
total
reported
for organic
metal-ligand heterolytic
bond
compounds.
dissociation
enthalpies
for M(acac)3
complexes
(AHhet
(M-(acac)3]
of the
first
S
can
using the
approximation AG
= AHa
(298
K) is small,
since
these
bond
enthalpies
have
values
in the range of
-600-650
kcal
(see
below)
When quoting
an average energy per
bond,
AXhet
(M-O)
error
introduced by
assuming
- AHa
is probably
kcal
cases
As discussed above,
throughout
dissertation
stationary
ectron
entropy
of AHa
convention
zero
is adopted,
to the
for monoatomic
which
free electron.
ions
at OK
apply
assigns
a heat
Under this
capacity
convention
at all temperatures,
values
since
heat
capacities
of Mz
and M(z'1)
are always
equal.
Therefore,
values
AHa M+3(g)
potential
are given by the
for the metal. T
negative
value of
stationary electron
third
ionization
convention
is adopted
to maintain
organic
consistency with
reference
the original
compounds on which
AGa values
the results
quoted
presented
for the
Ln this
dissertation
are based.
From cycle
II of Figure
5-1, AG0 M(acac)3(g)
data
can be
compared
with AGa
between t
for the
same process
solvation
free
in solution
energies
to yield
of a M(acac)3
the difference
neutral
its anion.
Values
of AGa M(acac)3(soln)
can be estimated
from electrochemical
values
for M(acac)3
AG8[M(acac)3(g)]
couples
data
(see discussion below).
at 350 K is valid at
Assuming
other temperatures
again
introduces
an approximation,
but using the
upper
limit
of -20 cal
for ASa0
a
, the error
introduced
in quoting values
AAG sov
acac)3
In the
at 298 K is again
thermochemical
used
typically
kcal
in this work
mol"1
to obtain
values
the bond
dissociation
enthalpies
for M(acac)3
and M(acac)3
complexes
value
for AHa
at 298 K for
acac"
radical
is needed.
value obtained
Homolvtic
and Heterolvtic
Bond
Enthalpies
in M(acac)ygql
Complexes
and M(acac)3
(c) Ions
The difference
total
heterolytic
or homolytic metal
-ligand bond
dissociation
enthalpies
between
any M(acac)
complex
and its
negative
ion can be obtained
from the relationships
AAHhet [M-(acac)
- AHhet
[M-(acac)3]
- AHhet[M-(acac)3
= AHa[M+3(g)]
- AHa[M(acac)3(g)]
AAHhom,[M-(acac)3
= AHho[M-(acac)3]
= AHa[M(g
- AHhmo[M-(acac)3 ]
- AHa[M(acac)3(g) ]
5-1 (b)
Values
for the
electron
attachment
energies
required
eq 5-1
given
in Table
Before deriving the
average bond
dissoc
nation
enthalpies
for the gas
-phase M(ac
ac)3 ions
by using
5-1 (a)
and 5-1
available data
for the
corresponding neutral
bond
enthalpies
critically
assessed
SInaccurate
assumptions made
in the
literature
derivations
revise the
required
published
us to generate new experimental
enthalpies
as discussed
in the
data
and thereby
following.
For M(acac)3
complexes
average
homolytic metal-oxygen bond
enthalpy,
AhoMn (M-O),
can be
found
from the
thermochemical
cycle
Figure
5-2.
The relationship between
various
thermochemi
values
is given
5-2.
AHhom
(M-O)
= 1/6
3AH (Hacac
+ 3AHvap
(Hacac)
+ 3AHhm(H-acac)
+ AHsub
- AHf[M(acac)
- AHsub([M(acac)3
- 3/2AHf[H(g)]
5-1 (
was
are
91
O
ra
0x
i-4
of
0
0 oa
C)
2 o
OD I
0 0)'
u 0) x N
0) _____ o0o__^
*mP
o+C
U a
aa
o> 0
-m +
o 0
o a. 4-- I"
U X + Ilo
Sc 0 0__ _
10
8 0
3c ^^ ) 'U
2 eJ
,C
t a)
0
-5-..
0C *s^o^
U' 0) S
0-' -.4-
3= =
)C
4-- U..
Table
5-1.
Free
M(acac1 complexes
ions an M(Qa.
Energies
of Electron Attachment
and Enthalpies
(kcal
of Electron Attachment
mol"
to Free M+3
AGa [M(acac)3
(g) ]
AHao[M+3 bg)]
AHao[M(g) ]c
-633.53
-24.9
-675.45
-713.5
-12(
-15(
-775.9
-43.0 0.5
-47 2
-38.7
-706.35
-772.0
0.5
-656
8(4.6)
-16(5)
-25(7)
aAll
values
taken
from Table
(temperature
= 350 K)
bValues
metals
given are negative of
taken from ref. 137.
CElectron affi]
in parenthesis
na
ity data
is the u
the third
Conversion
for atomic metal
uncertainty
ionization
factor
taken
in the last
potentials
= 23.065
from ref.
Kcal
138.
of the
mol"
Number
figures)
v
between
AHho0(M-O)
and the
average
heterolytic metal
oxygen
bond
enthalpy
AHhet
given
5-3.
M-O)
The summation
- -
6
term
M-O) +
^iIP(M)
i-i
5-3 is the sum of
+3AHa
first
(acac
three
ionization
potentials
for the metal M.
Values
for AHf0
for M(acac)3
complexes
first
transition metal
series
are available
in the
literature
from
results
results
of Wood
of reaction
and Jones
using
calorimetry.
bomb calorimetry139
140-143
Reaction
from
calorimetry
considered
to be the more
reliable method
for M(acac)3
compounds
144,141a
this
technique
has been applied
to M(acac)
complexes
of interest
here
for M
= Cr, Mn,
Fe and Co.
141,142
Reaction
calorimetry
been
used by
Ribeiro
Da Silva
and co-workers
to determine values
of AHf0
AHho ( M-O
technique
for other tris
B-diketonate
to transition metal
complexes,
B-diketonates
application
has been
reviewed.
Their work
AHhno(M-O)
included
derived
a reappraisal
from the original
of of the
reaction
values
of AHf0
calorimetry
studies,
values
have
been
revised
here
using the
latest
values
of the
auxiliary thermo
chemical
data
required
for their
determination.
values
that
introduce
the greatest
uncertainty
in derived
bond
phase
enthalpies
homolytic
for the M(acac)3
bond
dissociation
complexes
enthalpy
are
values
of the O-H
of the gas-
bond
enol
form of
acetylacetone
(AHh" (H-acac)
eq 5-2)
and the enthalpy
sublimation
of the M(
acac)3
complex
Values
for AHsub0[M
acac)3]
difficult
volatility
to measure
such
prec
isely
as M(acac)3
for compounds
complexes.
of relatively
For example
values
for AHsub
fnr Crtacaci
noted
.1.. I r~ r1f~s. r rIlrrl n nfl rr~ I r*~r1 '1 aot4
--- -
CT !'A
I--- -
- I
are
(M-O
AHhet
16A hom
n1 Cob
I
I |
q
r nn u r-rn nTT nar^
earlier work
was recognized
in the reappraisal
Ribiero
Da Silva
co-workers.
From
a review of
the results
available
in the
literature,
values
of AH [M(acac)3]
chosen by these workers were
in the
range
of -28-33
kcal
1 The
same
values
were
used
in this
report
are given
in Table
5-2 along with
the other
auxiliary
data
used
in Figure
5-2.
No experimental
values
have
been available
for the
value of
AHho(H-acac),
and values
used
previously
have been
estimated.
difficulty
assess
ing the contributions
to the relative
stability
acetylacetone
due to
intramolecular
hydrogen bonding
in the
enol
form
the effects of
electronic delocalization
in the
acetylacetonate
radical
led to estimated
values
ranging
from 87-110
kcal
-1 139,1I
A value of
AHho0 (H-acac)
can be obtained
from the
gas-phase
proton
affinity
AHpA)
acac
-,146
9
acac"
and the
ioni
zation
potential
H atom.
The relationship
given by
AHhon (H-acac)
= AHpA(acac
- IP(H(g))
- AHao(acac-)
Substituting the
available
data
from the
literature
and AHa
acac"
determined
in this
report
(Table
5-2)
into eq
yields
a value
AHho(H-acac)
of 90 + 5
kcal mol
The new value
for the
AHho ( H-acac
combined
with
reaction
calorimetry
data
leads
to new values
of AHh,o(M-o)
AHhet
(M-O)
the M(
acac)
complexes
of Cr, Mn,
Fe and Co
, and these
values
are
given
in Table
5-3.
Also given
in Table
are the values
AAHhet
(acac)
obtained
from eq
the data
Tabli
resulting
AHhet
(M-O)
and AHh0 (M-O)
values
from eqs
r 4-b
af~
U -. n
S
- .
5 *% n -S a.an 1 nn~ m.. 1 a C.
5-1 (
A
ik *
[M-
C- -1
Ik J
s *". i
|
Full Text |
PAGE 1
7+(502'<1$0,& $63(&76 2) *$63+$6( (/(&7521 $77$&+0(17 72 75$16,7,21 0(7$/ 75,6%(7$',.(721$7(f &203/(;(6 3$8/ 6+$53( $ ',66(57$7,21 35(6(17(' 72 7+( *5$'8$7( 6&+22/ 2) 7+( 81,9(56,7< 2) )/25,'$ ,1 3$57,$/ )8/),//0(17 2) 7+( 5(48,5(0(176 )25 7+( '(*5(( 2) '2&725 2) 3+,/2623+< 81,9(56,7< 2) )/25,'$
PAGE 2
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
PAGE 3
7$%/( 2) &217(176 SDJH $&.12:/('*0(176 $%675$&7 &+$37(56 ,1752'8&7,21 2YHUYLHZ RI 5HVHDUFK ,QWURGXFWLRQ WR 0HWDO %'LNHWRQDWH &RPSOH[HV 3URSHUWLHV DQG $SSOLFDWLRQV RI 0HWDO %'LNHWRQDWHV 'HVFULSWLRQ RI WKH )7,&5 7HFKQLTXH (;3(5,0(17$/ 352&('85(6 $1' 5(68/76 3UHSDUDWLRQ RI 7ULVKH[DIOXRURDFHW\ODFHWRQDWHf &RPSOH[HV 3UHSDUDWLRQ RI 7ULVDFHW\ODFHWRQDWHf &RPSOH[HV 3UHSDUDWLRQ RI 5XWKHQLXP 7ULV%'LNHWRQDWHVf 2UJDQLF &RPSRXQGV (OHFWURQ $WWDFKPHQW 6WXGLHV *DV3KDVH 6SHFWURSKRWRPHWU\ RI &UKIDFf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f DQG 0KIDFf &RPSOH[HV &RQFOXVLRQV
PAGE 4
0(7$//,*$1' %21' (1(5*,(6 $1' 62/9$7,21 (1(5*,(6 )25 *$63+$6( 75$16,7,21 0(7$/ 75,6$&(7$&(721$7(f &203/(;(6 $1' 7+(,5 $1,216 ,QWURGXFWLRQ (OHFWURQ $WWDFKPHQW (QHUJ\ 5HODWLRQVKLSV +RPRO\WLF DQG +HWHURO\WLF 02 %RQG (QWKDOSLHV LQ 0DFDFfJf &RPSOH[HV DQG 0DFDFfnJf ,RQV 5HODWLYH 6ROYDWLRQ (QHUJLHV RI 0DFDFfJf DQG 0DFDFfnJf 5HODWLYH 6ROYDWLRQ (QHUJLHV RI 5XWIDFfJf DQG 5XKIDFf DQG 7KHLU 1HJDWLYH ,RQV &RQFOXVLRQV ,OO ,17(535(7$7,21 2) 7+( 75(1'6 21 7+( (/(&7521 $77$&+0(17 )5(( (1(5*,(6 2) 7+( 75,6$&(7$&(721$7(f $1' 75,6+(;$)/8252$&(7$&(721$7(f &203/(;(6 2) 7+( 0(7$/6 7L&R 86,1* 7+( 6,03/( /,*$1' ),(/' 02'(/ ,QWURGXFWLRQ 7KHUPRFKHPLFDO 5HODWLRQVKLSV DQG 3HULRGLF 7UHQGV &RQFOXVLRQV 5()(5(1&(6 %,2*5$3+,&$/ 6.(7&+ LY
PAGE 5
$EVWUDFW RI 'LVVHUWDWLRQ 3UHVHQWHG WR WKH *UDGXDWH 6FKRRO RI WKH 8QLYHUVLW\ RI )ORULGD LQ 3DUWLDO )XOILOOPHQW RI WKH 5HTXLUHPHQWV IRU WKH 'HJUHH RI 'RFWRU RI 3KLORVRSK\ 7+(502'<1$0,& $63(&76 2) *$63+$6( (/(&7521 $77$&+0(17 72 75$16,7,21 0(7$/ 75,6%(7$',.(721$7(f &203/(;(6 %\ 3DXO 6KDUSH $XJXVW &KDLUPDQ 'DYLG ( 5LFKDUGVRQ 3K' 0DMRU 'HSDUWPHQW &KHPLVWU\ (VWLPDWLRQV RI WKH IUHH HQHUJLHV RI JDVSKDVH HOHFWURQ DWWDFKPHQW WR VHYHUDO WUDQVLWLRQ PHWDO WULV%GLNHWRQDWHf FRPSOH[HV DW DUH UHSRUWHG 7KH FRPSRXQGV VWXGLHG DUH WKH WULVDFHW\ODFHWRQDWHf FRPSOH[HV 0DFDFff DQG WKH WULVKH[DIOXRURDFHW\ODFHWRQDWHf FRPSOH[HV 0KIDFff RI WKH VHULHV RI ILUVW URZ WUDQVLWLRQ PHWDOV 0 *D &R ,Q DGGLWLRQ GDWD IRU WKH UXWKHQLXP FRPSOH[HV 5XDFDFf 5XWIDFf DQG 5XKIDFf DUH UHSRUWHG ZKHUH WIDF LV WULIOXRURDFHW\ODFHWRQDWH 7KLV ZRUN UHSUHVHQWV WKH ILUVW UHOLDEOH HVWLPDWLRQV RI WKHUPDO JDVSKDVH HOHFWURQ DWWDFKPHQW HQHUJLHV IRU D FODVV RI FRRUGLQDWLRQ FRPSRXQGV (OHFWURQ DWWDFKPHQW IUHH HQHUJLHV IRU WKH FRPSOH[HV ZHUH REWDLQHG E\ XVLQJ )RXULHU WUDQVIRUP LRQ F\FORWURQ UHVRQDQFH PDVV VSHFWURPHWU\ )7,&5f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
PAGE 6
7KH HOHFWURQ DWWDFKPHQW HQHUJ\ GDWD DUH FRPELQHG ZLWK RWKHU WKHUPRFKHPLFDO GDWD LQ HQHUJ\ F\FOHV WKDW OHDG WR HVWLPDWLRQV RI WKH FKDQJHV LQ KHWHURO\WLF 0 ERQG HQWKDOSLHV DQG VROYDWLRQ IUHH HQHUJLHV 7KH REVHUYDWLRQ RI FKDUJHWUDQVIHU EUDFNHWLQJ UHDFWLRQV LQYROYLQJ DFHW\ODFHWRQDWH DQLRQV OHG WR WKH GHWHUPLQDWLRQ RI WKH KHWHURO\WLF DQG KRPRO\WLF 02 ERQG HQWKDOSLHV IRU 0DFDFf QHXWUDOV DQG WKHLU DQLRQV 3XEOLVKHG HVWLPDWLRQV RI WKH DEVROXWH SRWHQWLDO RI WKH VWDQGDUG K\GURJHQ HOHFWURGH OHG WR HVWLPDWLRQV RI WKH IUHH HQHUJ\ IRU VROXWLRQSKDVH HOHFWURQ DWWDFKPHQW WR WKH FRPSOH[HV LQ VHYHUDO VROYHQWV )RU 5XDFDFf WKH VLQJOH LRQ VROYDWLRQ IUHH HQHUJ\ LV HVWLPDWHG DQG WKH UHVXOW LV GLVFXVVHG LQ FRPSDULVRQ WR D VLPLODU HVWLPDWLRQ EDVHG RQ D GLHOHFWULF FRQWLQXXP WKHRUHWLFDO PRGHO 7KH UHVXOWV RI WKLV LQYHVWLJDWLRQ VHUYH WR LOOXVWUDWH WKH UHODWLYH LPSRUWDQFH RI FKDQJHV LQ ERQG HQHUJLHV DQG VROYDWLRQ HQHUJLHV WKDW GHWHUPLQH WKH PDJQLWXGH RI UHGR[ FRXSOHV LQYROYLQJ UHGXFWLRQ RI WULV GLNHWRQDWHf FRPSOH[HV YL
PAGE 7
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r H9 WR H9 7KH PDMRULW\ RI H[SHULPHQWDO PHWKRGV LQYROYLQJ JDVSKDVH QHJDWLYH LRQV WKDW KDYH EHHQ XVHG WR GHWHUPLQH WKH HOHFWURQ DWWDFKPHQW HQHUJLHV RI PHWDO FRPSOH[HV FDQ EH FODVVLILHG DV WKUHVKROG PHWKRGV ,Q WKUHVKROG PHWKRGV HOHFWURQ DWWDFKPHQW HQHUJLHV DUH LQIHUUHG IURP WKH PLQLPXP
PAGE 8
HQHUJ\ RI DQ LPSLQJLQJ SDUWLFOH WKDW FDXVHV WKH IRUPDWLRQ RU EUHDNGRZQ RI D QHJDWLYH LRQ ,Q WKH DWRP LPSDFW PHWKRG EHDPV RI HQHUJ\ VHOHFWHG QHXWUDO DONDOL DWRPV DUH FROOLGHG ZLWK D QHXWUDO WDUJHW JDV 7KH WUDQVODWLRQDO HQHUJ\ GHSHQGHQFH RI WKH DONDOL DWRP EHDP LV PRQLWRUHG DV D IXQFWLRQ RI WKH UHODWLYH FURVV VHFWLRQ IRU WKH IRUPDWLRQ RI WKH SDUHQW DQLRQ RI WKH WDUJHW PROHFXOHV 8VLQJ WKLV PHWKRG &RPSWRQ DQG FRn ZRUNHUV KDYH SURYLGHG HVWLPDWHV IRU WKH HOHFWURQ DIILQLWLHV RI 0R)Â 5H) 8) 8) 6H) 7H)Â DQG :)n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s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n 0RUH DFFXUDWH GHWHUPLQDWLRQV DUH SRVVLEOH ZLWK SKRWRGHWDFKPHQW DQG SKRWRHOHFWURQ VSHFWURVFRS\ PHWKRGV %RWK RI WKHVH PHWKRGV DUH EDVHG RQ
PAGE 9
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
PAGE 10
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f DQG LRQ F\FORWURQ UHVRQDQFH PDVV VSHFWURPHWU\ ,&5f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nn $ UHODWLYHO\ UHFHQW WHFKQLTXH LQ PDVV VSHFWURPHWU\ WKDW LV DOVR FDSDEOH RI PRQLWRULQJ WKH WLPH GHSHQGHQFH RI LRQPROHFXOH UHDFWLRQV LV WKH YHUVDWLOH DQG SRZHUIXO )RXULHU WUDQVIRUP LRQ F\FORWURQ UHVRQDQFH PDVV VSHFWURPHWU\ )7,&5f $Q LPSRUWDQW GLIIHUHQFH EHWZHHQ )7,&5 DQG RWKHU WHFKQLTXHV LQ PDVV VSHFWURPHWU\ LV WKDW RQO\ YHU\ ORZ RSHUDWLQJ SUHVVXUHV RI UHDFWDQWV DUH UHTXLUHG 7KLV IHDWXUH PDNHV )7,&5 SDUWLFXODUO\ VXLWDEOH IRU WKH VWXG\ RI ORZYRODWLOLW\ FRPSRXQGV )7,&5 KDV EHHQ H[SORLWHG LQ WKH VWXG\ RI JDVSKDVH LRQPROHFXOH +HQFH
PAGE 11
UHDFWLRQV RI PHWDO FRQWDLQLQJ FRPSRXQGVnA 0XFK RI WKH SXEOLVKHG UHVHDUFK FRQVLGHUV LRQPROHFXOH SURFHVVHV LQYROYLQJ PHWDO FRQWDLQLQJ LRQV PRVWO\ GHULYHG IURP RUJDQRPHWDOOLF SUHFXUVRUVf RU EDUH PHWDO LRQV SL B SURGXFHG E\ WHFKQLTXHV VXFK DV ODVHU YDSRUL]DWLRQ RI PHWDO WDUJHWVf ]r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f 0DFDFff DQG WULVKH[DIOXRURDFHW\ODFHWRQDWHf 0KIDFff FRPSOH[HV RI WKH VHULHV RI PHWDOV 0 6F &R DQG *D 7KH FRPSOH[HV 5XDFDFf 5XKIDFf DQG 5XWIDFf ZHUH DOVR LQFOXGHG ZKHUH WIDF WULIOXRURDFHW\ODFHWRQDWHf 7KHVH FRPSOH[HV DUH SVHXGRRFWDKHGUDO WULV FKHODWH FRRUGLQDWLRQ FRPSOH[HV LQ ZKLFK WKH OLJDQGV ELQG WR PHWDO FHQWHUV ZLWK R[\JHQ DWRP GRQRUV (VWLPDWHV RI WKH IUHH HQHUJLHV RI HOHFWURQ DWWDFKPHQW IRU WKHVH FRPSOH[HV ZHUH REWDLQHG LQ WKH SUHVHQW ZRUN DQG WKLV UHSUHVHQWV WKH ILUVW UHOLDEOH GHWHUPLQDWLRQ RI WKH JDV SKDVH HOHFWURQ DWWDFKPHQW HQHUJLHV RI FRRUGLQDWLRQ FRPSOH[HV XQGHU WKHUPDO FRQGLWLRQV 7KH VHFRQG REMHFWLYH ZDV WR GHWHUPLQH WKH FKDQJHV LQ DYHUDJH KHWHURO\WLF PHWDOR[\JHQ 02f ERQG HQHUJLHV WKDW RFFXU GXULQJ JDVSKDVH HOHFWURQ DWWDFKPHQW WR WKH GLNHWRQDWH FRPSOH[HV $OVR IRU WKH FRPSOH[HV WKDW H[KLELW UHYHUVLEOH RQHHOHFWURQ HOHFWURFKHPLFDO UHGXFWLRQ LQ VROXWLRQ GHWHUPLQH WKH FKDQJHV LQ VROYDWLRQ HQHUJLHV WKDW FRQWULEXWH WR WKH PDJQLWXGH RI WKH UHGXFWLRQ SRWHQWLDO 7KHVH HQHUJLHV ZHUH
PAGE 12
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f DQG 0+f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f FRPSOH[HV ,Q WKH DX[LOLDU\ WKHUPRFKHPLFDO GDWD UHTXLUHG LQ WKH F\FOHV XVHG WR REWDLQ WKHVH YDOXHV WKH YDOXH IRU WKH KRPRO\WLF ERQG GLVVRFLDWLRQ
PAGE 13
HQWKDOS\ RI WKH HQROLF + ERQG LQ DFHW\ODFHWRQH LQWURGXFHV WKH JUHDWHVW XQFHUWDLQW\ VLQFH QR H[SHULPHQWDO GDWD DUH DYDLODEOH )URP WKH UHVXOWV RI WKHUPDO JDVSKDVH FKDUJHWUDQVIHU UHDFWLRQV LQYROYLQJ DFDFf LRQV SUHVHQWHG LQ WKH SUHVHQW ZRUN DQ LPSURYHG HVWLPDWH LV PDGH IRU WKH HQROLF + ERQG HQWKDOS\ )URP WKH RULJLQDO UHDFWLRQ FDORULPHWU\ GDWD LPSURYHG HVWLPDWHV DUH PDGH IRU WKH DYHUDJH 02 KRPRO\WLF DQG KHWHURO\WLF ERQG GLVVRFLDWLRQ HQWKDOSLHV IRU 0DFDFf FRPSOH[HV 7KLV GDWD ZKHQ FRPELQHG ZLWK WKH JDVSKDVH HOHFWURQ DWWDFKPHQW HQHUJ\ GDWD IRU WKH 0DFDFf FRPSOH[HV KDV DOORZHG WKH DYHUDJH KHWHURO\WLF DQG KRPRO\WLF ERQG GLVVRFLDWLRQ HQWKDOSLHV IRU WKH FRUUHVSRQGLQJ JDVSKDVH 0 f LRQV WR EH GHWHUPLQHG ,W KDV EHHQ VKRZQ IRU 0+f UHGR[ FRXSOHV RI WKH ILUVW WUDQVLWLRQ PHWDO VHULHV LRQV WKDW WKH WUHQG LQ WKH PDJQLWXGHV RI WKH UHGXFWLRQ SRWHQWLDOV IRU WKHVH FRXSOHV FDQ EH UHODWHG TXLWH VXFFHVVIXOO\ WR WKH WUHQG LQ WKH HOHFWURQ DWWDFKPHQW HQHUJLHV RI WKH IUHH 0 LRQV WKH QHJDWLYH YDOXH RI WKH WKLUG LRQL]DWLRQ SRWHQWLDO RI 0Jff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f LRQV GLIIHUHQFHV LQ OLJDQG ILHOG VWDELOL]DWLRQ HQHUJLHV KDYH EHHQ GHULYHG VSHFWURVFRSLFDOO\ DQG KDYH EHHQ XVHG WR FRUUHFWf WKH YDOXHV RI WKH UHGXFWLRQ SRWHQWLDOV WR JHQHUDWH WKH WUHQG
PAGE 14
OLQH IRU WKH HOHFWURQ DWWDFKPHQW HQHUJLHV RI WKH IUHH LRQV ,Q WKLV ZD\ D VLPSOH H[SODQDWLRQ LV SURYLGHG IRU WKH WUHQGV LQ WKH UHGXFWLRQ SRWHQWLDOV 7KH WUHQG LQ WKH JDVSKDVH HOHFWURQ DWWDFKPHQW HQHUJLHV IRU WKH 0DFDFfA FRPSOH[HV LQ WKH SUHVHQW ZRUN LV H[SODLQHG E\ XVLQJ D VLPLODU DSSURDFK WR WKDW WDNHQ IRU WKH 0+f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fH[LVW LQ HTXLOLEULXP ZLWK HDFK RWKHU DQG VWUXFWXUDOO\ WKH\ SRVVHVV D FLV FRQILJXUDWLRQ DQG D V\Q
PAGE 15
5 U 5 /LJDQG $EEUHY FK FK + $FHW\ODFHWRQDWH DFDF FK FI + 7ULIOXRURDFHW\ODFHWRQDWH WI DF &) JI + +H[DIOXRURDFHW\ODFHWRQDWH KI DF WEXW\O WEXW\O + 'LSLYDOR\OPHWKDQDWH GSP SKHQ\O FK + %HQ]R\ODFHW\ODFHWRQDWH E]DF )LJXUH 6WUXFWXUH DQG QRPHQFODWXUH RI %GLNHWRQDWH OLJDQGV
PAGE 16
FLVRLGf FRQIRUPDWLRQ 7KH SURSRUWLRQ RI WKH HQRO WDXWRPHUV JHQHUDOO\ LQFUHDVHV ZKHQ DQ HOHFWURQ ZLWKGUDZLQJ JURXS VXFK DV D KDORJHQ DWRP LV SUHVHQW DV 5 7KH HQROL]DWLRQ DOVR LQFUHDVHV ZKHQ WKH OLJDQGV DUH IOXRULQDWHG RU FRQWDLQ DQ DURPDWLF ULQJ 6XEVWLWXWLRQ E\ D EXON\ JURXS HJ DON\Of DW WKH ULQJ D RU \ FDUERQ DWRPV FDXVHV VWHULF KLQGUDQFH EHWZHHQ 5 DQG 5 RU 5f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f FRPSOH[HV
PAGE 17
7DEOH 6WUXFWXUDO 'HWDLOV RI 0HWDO 7ULV IO'LNHWRQDWHVf 202 %LWH 02 %RQG &RPSOH[ $QJOH /HQJWO 9DFDFfDfD r 9DFDFf%fD r &UDFDFfE r 0QDFDFfF r )HDFDFfG r &RDFDFfH r &RDFDFfn %X1 VDOWfI r 5XDFDFf r &U KIDFfK r )HWKIDFfA r D'DWD WDNHQ IURP UHI A'DWD WDNHQ IURP UHI F'DWD WDNHQ IURP UHI G'DWD WDNHQ IURP UHI H'DWD WDNHQ IURP UHI I'DWD WDNHQ IURP UHI 'DWD WDNHQ IURP UHI K'DWD WDNHQ IURP UHI f f'DWD WDNHQ IURP UHI
PAGE 18
)RU V\PPHWULFDO OLJDQGV 5 DQG 5Â LQ )LJXUH DUH WKH VDPHf WZR RSWLFDO LVRPHUV DUH SRVVLEOH )LJXUH f 7KH G DQG RSWLFDO LVRPHUV RI &UKIDFf KDYH EHHQ LVRODWDWHG E\ JDVFKURPDWRJUDSKLF WHFKQLTXHV E\ XVLQJ DQ RSWLFDOO\ DFWLYH VXSSRUWA )RU XQV\PPHWULFDO OLJDQGV 5 DQG 5 LQ )LJXUH DUH QRW WKH VDPHf HDFK RSWLFDO LVRPHU FDQ H[LVW LQ D FLV RU WUDQV FRQIRUPDWLRQ ,W KDV EHHQ IRXQG E\ XVLQJ D JDVFKURPDWRJUDSK HTXLSSHG ZLWK DQ HOHFWURQ FDSWXUH GHFWHFWRU WKDW &UKIDFf XQGHUJRHV G\QDPLF FLVWUDQV LQWUDPROHFXODU LVRPHULVP LQ WKH JDVSKDVHA 7ULV*GLNHWRQDWHf WUDQVLWLRQ PHWDO FRPSOH[HV RI XQV\PPHWULFDO OLJDQGV KDYH UHFHLYHG FRQVLGHUDEOH DWWHQWLRQ UHJDUGLQJ LQYHVWLJDWLRQV RI WKH PHFKDQLVPV WKDW KDYH EHHQ SURSRVHG IRU LQWUDPROHFXODU VWUXFWXUDO LVRPHULVP LQ WULVFKHODWH FRPSOH[HV )RU VHYHUDO RI WKH WULVFKHODWH PHWDO FRPSOH[HV VWXGLHG LQ WKLV UHSRUW ;UD\ FU\VWDO VWUXFWXUHV RU JDVSKDVH HOHFWURQ GLIIUDFWLRQ VWUXFWXUHV DUH DYDLODEOH 7KH ELWH DQJOH RI WKH OLJDQGV DQG WKH 02 ERQG OHQJWKV REWDLQHG IURP WKHVH LQYHVWLJDWLRQV DUH SUHVHQWHG LQ 7DEOH 7KH ELWH DQJOH RI WKH R[\JHQ GRQRU DWRPV LV LQ DOO FDVHV LV TXLWH FORVH WR r ZKLFK JLYHV D SVHXGRRFWDKHGUDO DUUDQJHPHQW DERXW WKH FHQWUDO PHWDO DWRP RI 2 GRQRU DWRPV 3URSHUWLHV DQG $SSOLFDWLRQV RI 0HWDO IL'LNHWRQDWHV ,Q WKLV VHFWLRQ VRPH EDFNJURXQG LV JLYHQ RI WKH FKHPLFDO DQG SK\VLFDO SURSHUWLHV DQG DSSOLFDWLRQV RI WUDQVLWLRQ PHWDO LGLNHWRQDWHV 7KH HPSKDVLV LV RQ WKH 0DFDFf 0WIDFf DQG 0KIDFf FRPSOH[HV RI WKH ILUVW WUDQVLWLRQ PHWDO VHULHV ZKLFK DUH WKH VXEMHFW RI WKH SUHVHQW VWXG\ DOWKRXJK RWKHU FRPSOH[HV DUH LQFOXGHG 0XFK RI WKH UHOHYDQW PDWHULDO ZKLFK VKRXOG DSSHDU LQ WKLV VHFWLRQ LV GLVFXVVHG RU UHIHUHQFHG LQ ODWHU FKDSWHUV DQG LV QRW SUHVHQWHG KHUH
PAGE 19
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f 0WIDFf 0KIDFf 7KH 0WIDFf FRPSOH[HV DUH XVXDOO\ RQO\ PDUJLQDOO\ PRUH YRODWLOH WKDQ 0DFDFf GXH WR WKH GLSROH PRPHQWV SUHVHQW LQ WKH FLV DQG WUDQV IRUPV RI 0WIDFf FRPSOH[HV 7KH YRODWLOLW\ RI WUDQVLWLRQ PHWDO %GLNHWRQDWHV KDV HQDEOHG WKHP WR EH VWXGLHG E\ D YDULHW\ RI SK\VLFDO PHWKRGV WKDW DUH QRW UHDGLO\ DSSOLHG WR OLJDWHG PHWDO FHQWHUV WKDW H[LVW DV LRQV 7KH YDSRUSKDVH +H,f SKRWRHOHFWURQ 3(f VSHFWUD RI 0KIDFf DQG 0DFDFf FRPSOH[HV KDYH EHHQ UHSRUWHGAn 7KH VSHFWUD ZHUH LQWHUSUHWHG LQ WHUPV RI HOHPHQWDU\ PROHFXODU RUELWDO WKHRU\ ZKLFK \LHOGHG LQIRUPDWLRQ FRQFHUQLQJ WKH GHWDLOV RI WKH PHWDOOLJDQG ERQGLQJ DQG LQ WKH FDVH RI WUDQVLWLRQ PHWDO FRPSOH[HV LQIRUPDWLRQ DERXW WKH WKH UHODWLYH HQHUJLHV RI WKH PHWDO G DQG OLJDQG RUELWDOV 6RPH LQWHUHVWLQJ DQG LPSRUWDQW ZRUN KDV UHFHQWO\ EHHQ UHSRUWHG RQ WKH XVH RI PHWDO %GLNHWRQDWHV LQ WKH ILHOG RI RUJDQRPHWDOOLF FKHPLFDO YDSRU GHSRVLWLRQ 20&9'f LQ WKH IRUPDWLRQ RI WKLQ ILOP KLJK WHPSHUDWXUH VXSHUFRQGXFWRUVn ,Q FRQWUDVW WR SK\VLFDO YDSRU GHSRVLWLRQ WKH
PAGE 20
PHWKRG GRHV QRW UHTXLUH KLJK YDFXXP DQG DFFRUGLQJO\ KDV WKH DGYDQWDJH RI UHODWLYH HDVH IRU ODUJH VFDOH DSSOLFDWLRQ ZLWK WKH SRVVLELOLW\ RI FRDWLQJ FRPSOLFDWHG VKDSHV 7KLQ ILOPV RI VXSHUFRQGXFWLQJ <%D&X KDYH EHHQ SUHSDUHG E\ D SURFHVV WKDW LQYROYHV WKHUPDO GHFRPSRVLWLRQ RI D IORZ RI D YDSRU PL[WXUH RI %GLNHWRQDWH SUHFXUVRUV RI < &X DQG %D LQ DUJRQ 7KHUH DUH VHYHUDO FRPSOH[HV RI \WWULXP DQG FRSSHU WKDW DUH VXIILFLHQWO\ YRODWLOH DQG WKHUPDOO\ VWDEOH WR EH XVHG IRU WKLV SXUSRVH 7KHVH LQFOXGH
PAGE 21
7KH YRODWLOLW\ RI PHWDO %GLNHWRQDWHV KDV DOORZHG VHYHUDO LQYHVWLJDWLRQV RI WKHLU JDVSKDVH SRVLWLYH DQG QHJDWLYH LRQV E\ XVLQJ PDVV VSHFWURPHWU\ 0XFK RI WKH ZRUN ZLWK SRVLWLYH LRQV KDV FRQFHUQHG WKH GHWHUPLQDWLRQ RI DSSHDUDQFH SRWHQWLDOV DQG PHFKDQLVPV RI IUDJPHQWDWLRQ VXEVHTXHQW WR HOHFWURQ LPSDFW (Of LRQL]DWLRQ 6RPH LQWHUHVWLQJ ZRUN KDV EHHQ UHSRUWHG E\ 3LHUFH DQG FRZRUNHUV LQ DQ LQYHVWLJDWLRQ RI WKH VHFRQGDU\ LRQ PDVV VSHFWURPHWU\ 6,06f DQG ODVHU GHVRUSWLRQ /'f RI VROLG VDPSOHV RI WUDQVLWLRQ PHWDO %GLNHWRQDWHV 2QH RI WKH DLPV RI WKH VWXG\ ZDV WR FRPSDUH WKH LRQLF VSHFLHV IRUPHG E\ FRQYHQWLRQDO (O LRQL]DWLRQ WR WR WKRVH IRUPHG IURP 6,06 DQG /' 7KH 6,06 VSHFWUD UHYHDOHG FDWRQL]DWLRQ RI LQWDFW QHXWUDO 0DFDFf FRPSOH[HV E\ LRQLF IUDJPHQWV SURGXFHG LQ WKH SODVPD DV ZHOO DV WKH LRQLF IUDJPHQWV WKHPVHOYHV ,RQV RI PDVVHV FRUUHVSRQGLQJ WR WKH IROORZLQJ VWRLFKLRPHWULHV ZHUH REVHUYHG 0DFDFf 0DFDFf 0DFDFf DQG 0DFDFfA 7KHVH VSHFLHV KDG DOVR EHHQ REVHUYHG LQ D VWXG\ RI 0DFDFf FRPSOH[HV XVLQJ KLJK SUHVVXUH PDVV VSHFWURPHWU\ &DWRQL]DWLRQ RI QHXWUDO 0DFDFf E\ 1D $J DQG 1+A ZDV DOVR IRXQG WR RFFXU ZKHQ WKH FKORULGHV RI WKHVH FDWLRQV ZHUH PL[HG ZLWK WKH VROLG VDPSOH RI PHWDO % GLNHWRQDWH 6,06 VSHFWUD RI PL[HG VDPSOHV RI 0DFDFf FRPSOH[HV RI WZR GLIIHUHQW PHWDOV SURGXFHG PL[HG PHWDO FOXVWHUV RI WKH VDPH JHQHUDO IRUPXOD :KHQ FHUWDLQ PL[WXUHV RI D PHWDO %GLNHWRQDWH D FKORULGH RI D GLIIHUHQW WUDQVLWRQ PHWDO DQG D FDWLRQL]LQJ DJHQW ZHUH YDSRUL]HG OLJDQG H[FKDQJH ZDV IRXQG WR RFFXU )RU H[DPSOH D PL[WXUH RI )HDFDFf &U&O DQG 1+A&O SURGXFHG &UDFDFf &UDFDFf )HDFDFf )HDFDFf DQG >)HDFDFf&+@fI )RU RWKHU PL[WXUHV QR OLJDQG H[FKDQJH IUDJPHQWV ZHUH GHWHFWHG 7KH VSHFWUD RI ODVHU GHVRUEHG VDPSOHV SURGXFHG PDQ\ RI WKH VDPH IUDJPHQW LRQV REVHUYHG LQ WKH 6,06 H[SHULPHQWV ,QWHUHVWLQJO\ GXULQJ WKH FRXUVH RI WKH SUHVHQW ZRUN OLJDQG H[FKDQJH KDV EHHQ REVHUYHG LQ JDVSKDVH LRQPROHFXOH UHDFWLRQV LQYROYLQJ QHJDWLYH LRQV IRUPHG IURP PL[WXUHV RI 0DFDFfA DQG 0KIDFfA FRPSOH[HV RI YDULRXV PHWDO DQG OLJDQG FRPELQDWLRQV +RZHYHU IRU FRPSOH[HV RI WKH PHWDOV &U DQG 5X OLJDQG
PAGE 22
H[FKDQJH ZDV IRXQG QRW WR RFFXU 7R SUREH WKH VWUXFWXUH RI WKH ELPHWDOOLF FOXVWHUV 3LHUFH DQG FRZRUNHUV XVHG FROOLVLRQDO GLVVRFLDWLRQ WR REVHUYH WKH SDWKZD\V IRU IUDJPHQWDWLRQ 7KH UHVXOWLQJ VSHFWUD LQGLFDWHG WKDW WKH FOXVWHU LRQV FRXOG QRW EH FRQVLGHUHG VLPSO\ DV PHWDO FDWLRQV 5DWKHU D VWDEOH VWUXFWXUH LQYROYLQJ PHWDO DWRPV ZDV LQYRNHG ZLWK SRVVLEOH PHWDOPHWDO ERQGLQJ 5HSRUWV RQ WKH QHJDWLYH LRQ PDVV VSHFWUD RI PHWDO %GLNHWRQDWH FRPSOH[HV KDYH IRFXVHG ODUJHO\ RQ 0KIDFf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f FRPSOH[HV H[KLELW UHYHUVLEOH HOHFWURFKHPLFDO EHKDYLRU HVSHFLDOO\ WKRVH FRQWDLQLQJ WKH PHWDOV )H 5X DQG &U 7KHUH DUH QXPHURXV UHSRUWV RQ WKH HIIHFW RI WKH OLJDQG 5 VXEVWLWXHQWV )LJXUH f RQ H[SHULPHQWDOO\ REVHUYHG ( YDOXHV IRU HOHFWURFKHPLFDO UHGXFWLRQ RI WKHVH FRPSOH[HVf 7KH VXEVWLWXHQW HIIHFWV DUH TXLWH SURQRXQFHG )RU H[DPSOH WKH ( YDOXHV UHSRUWHG IRU 5XGSPf DQG 5XKIDFf GLIIHU E\ 9 LQ GLPHWK\OIRUPDPLGH )RU VHULHV RI WULV%GLNHWRQDWHf FRPSOH[HV RI WKH VDPH PHWDO WKH WUHQGV LQ UHGXFWLRQ SRWHQWLDOV FRUUHODWH SUHGLFWDEO\ ZLWK WKH HOHFWURQ UHOHDVLQJ RU ZLWKGUDZLQJ QDWXUH RI WKH OLJDQG ULQJ VXEVWLWXHQWV 7KXV WKH RUGHU RI HDVH RI UHGXFWLRQ IRU FRPOH[HV RI 5X DQG &U LV 0GSPf 0DFDFf 0WIDFf 0KIDFf 7KH GHORFDOL]HG Q V\VWHP LQ WKDW H[WHQGV RYHU WKH PHWDO FHQWHU DQG WKH OLJDQG EDFNERQH DWRPV LQ PHWDO %GLNHWRQDWHV KDV EHHQ GHVFULEHG DV SRVVHVVLQJ TXDVL
PAGE 23
DURPDWLF FKDUDFWHU ,W KDV EHHQ VKRZQ WKDW WKHUH LV D VWURQJ FRUUHODWLRQ EHWZHHQ WKH WUHQGV LQ ( YDOXHV IRU WKH UHGXFWLRQ RI D VHULHV RI WULV%GLNHWRQDWHf FRPSOH[HV RI WKH VDPH PHWDO DQG +DPPHWW D SDUDPHWHUV WKDW KDYH EHHQ GHULYHG IURP REVHUYDWLRQV RI WKH HIIHFW RI ULQJ VXEVWLWXHQWV RQ WKH WKHUPRG\QDPLFV DQG NLQHWLFV LQYROYLQJ UHDFWLRQV RI RUJDQLF DURPDWLF FRPSRXQGV ,QWHUHVWLQJO\ IRU FRPSOH[HV RI YDU\LQJ 5 DQG 5 ZLWK 5A + )LJXUH f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f ZLWK D YDULHW\ RI HOHFWURSKLOHV 7KH ZLGH YDULHW\ RI UHDFWLRQV FDQ EH FODVVLILHG LQWR KDORJHQDWLRQ QLWUDWLRQ GLD]RWL]DWLRQ WKLRF\DQDWLRQ DFHW\ODWLRQ DQG IRUP\ODWLRQ 7KH UHDFWLRQ FRQGLWLRQV PXVW EH FKRVHQ VR WKDW WKH DFLG ODELOH %GLNHWRQDWH ULQJV DUH QRW GHJUDGHG 7KH PRVW ZLGHO\ VWXGLHG FRPSOH[HV DUH WKHUHIRUH WKRVH RI FKURPLXP,,,f FREDOW,,,f DQG UXWKHQLXP,,,f ZKLFK DUH QRW K\GURO\]HG LQ DFLG VROXWLRQ
PAGE 24
'HVFULSWLRQ RI WKH )7,&5 7HFKQLTXH 3URGXFWLRQ WUDSSLQJ DQG PDVV DQDO\VLV RI LRQV ,Q 0DUVKDOO DQG &RPLVDURZ GHYHORSHG D PHWKRG RI DSSO\LQJ WKH )RXULHU WUDQVIRUP WHFKQLTXH WR WKH DQDO\VLV RI WKH PDVVHV DQG UHODWLYH DEXQGDQFHV RI LRQV WUDSSHG LQ DQ LRQ F\FORWURQ FHOO 7KH VLPXOWDQHRXV GHWHFWLRQ RI PDQ\ LRQV RYHU D ZLGH PDVV UDQJH FLUFXPYHQWHG PDQ\ RI WKH OLPLWDWLRQV RI WKH RULJLQDO VFDQQLQJ LRQ F\FORWURQ UHVRQDQFH PDVV VSHFWURPHWU\ ,&5f WHFKQLTXH 6LQFH WKHQ WKH )RXULHU WUDQVIRUP PHWKRG NQRZQ DV )RXULHU WUDQVIRUP LRQ F\FORWURQ UHVRQDQFH PDVV VSHFWURPHWU\ )7,&5f KDV GHYHORSHG LQWR D SRZHUIXO DQG YHUVDWLOH WHFKQLTXH LQ PDVV VSHFWURPHWU\ 7KH )7,&5 WHFKQLTXH LV EDVHG RQ WKH FODVVLFDO PRWLRQ RI LRQV GHVFULEHG E\ HOHPHQWDU\ ODZV RI HOHFWURPDJQHWLVP 7KH PDJQHWLF IRUFH /RUHQW] IRUFH ) T9[%f f DFWLQJ RQ D SDUWLFOH RI PDVV 0 FKDUJH T DQG LQLWLDO YHORFLW\ 9 LQ D ILHOG RI PDJQHWLF LQGXFWLRQ % FDXVHV LW WR IROORZ D KHOLFDO SDWK )LJXUH 7KH FRQVWUDLQHG FLUFXODU PRWLRQ KDV D IUHTXHQF\ LQ +] JLYHQ E\ Y T%U0 7KLV IUHTXHQF\ LV WKH F\FORWURQ Z IUHTXHQF\ DQG IDOOV LQ WKH UDQJH RI UDGLR ZDYH IUHTXHQFLHV 0+]f IRU PDJQHWLF ILHOGV RQ WKH RUGHU RI WHVOD 7R SUHYHQW LRQV IURP WUDYHOOLQJ DORQJ WKH KHOLFDO SDWK DQG EHLQJ ORVW LRQV DUH SURGXFHG EHWZHHQ WZR WUDSSLQJ SODWHV SHUSHQGLFXODU WR WKH PDJQHWLF ILHOG 7KHVH SODWHV DUH PDLQWDLQHG DW D UHSXOVLYH SRWHQWLDO W\SLFDOO\ RU YROW IRU SRVLWLYH DQG QHJDWLYH LRQV UHVSHFWLYHO\f DQG WKH LRQV WKHUHE\ DUH KHOG LQ D GHILQHG UHJLRQ EHWZHHQ WKH WZR SODWHV ([FLWDWLRQ DQG GHWHFWLRQ RI WKH WUDSSHG LRQV UHTXLUH WZR DGGLWLRQDO VHWV RI SODWHV WUDQVPLW DQG UHFHLYH SODWHVf O\LQJ DORQJ WKH D[LV RI WKH PDJQHWLF ILHOG EHWZHHQ WKH WUDSSLQJ SODWHV VR WKH KHDUW RI WKH )7,&5 LV D ER[ VKDSHG FHOO RI SODWHV &HOOV DUH W\SLFDOO\ FXELFA ZLWK HDFK SODWH RI DSSUR[ VTXDUH LQFK )LJXUH f 7KH FHOO LV PRXQWHG LQ D KLJK YDFXXP FKDPEHU LQ D VWURQJ PDJQHWLF ILHOG WKH 1LFROHW )7,&5
PAGE 25
fm )LJXUH ,RQV ZLWK LQLWLDO YHORFLW\ 9 DUH FRQVWUDLQHG WR D KHOLFDO SDWK DORQJ WKH D[LV RI WKH PDJQHWLF ILHOG
PAGE 26
HOHFWURQ FROOHFWRU WUDSSLQJ UHFHLYHU SODWH WUDQVPLWWHU WUDSSLQJ SODWH WUDQVPLWWHU UHFHLYHU ILODPHQW )LJXUH &XELF DQDO\VLV FHOO RI WKH )7,&5
PAGE 27
XVHG LQ WKH SUHVHQW VWXG\ KDV D WHVOD VXSHUFRQGXFWLQJ PDJQHWf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f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f WKHUHE\ SURGXFLQJ
PAGE 28
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fILHOG DOORZV WKH GHWHFWLRQ RI LPSRUWDQW ORZHU PDVV LRQV VXFK DV 2+n ZLWK DQ DFFRPSDQ\LQJ GHFUHDVH LQ KLJK PDVV UHVROXWLRQ 0DQLSXODWLRQV RI LRQV LQ WKH WUDS %HWZHHQ WKH LRQL]DWLRQ DQG GHWHFWLRQ HYHQWV DQ\ RQH LRQLF PDVV FDQ EH NLQHWLFDOO\ H[FLWHG E\ DSSOLFDWLRQ RI D VLQJOH IUHTXHQF\ SXOVH YLD WKH WUDQVPLW SODWHV $ UDQJH RI PDVVHV FDQ EH H[FLWHG E\ D IUHTXHQF\ VZHHS 6HOHFWHG LRQV FDQ EH HMHFWHG IURP WKH FHOO FRPSOHWHO\ LI WKH\ DEVRUE VXIILFLHQW HQHUJ\ WR VSLUDO RXW WR RUELWV RI VXFK ODUJH UDGLXV WKDW WKH\ VWULNH WKH FHOO SODWHV LRQ HMHFWLRQf ,I D ORZ DPSOLWXGH SXOVH RU VZHHS LV DSSOLHG WKH NLQHWLF HQHUJ\ RI WKH LRQV FDQ EH LQFUHDVHG ZLWKRXW HMHFWLQJ WKHP IURP WKH FHOO 7KLV WHFKQLTXH FDQ EH XVHG WR H[SORUH HQGRWKHUPLF UHDFWLRQ FKDQQHOV E\ LQFUHDVLQJ WKH HQHUJ\ RI UHDFWDQWV DQG WKLV WUDQVODWLRQDO H[FLWDWLRQ LV RQH ZD\ E\ ZKLFK VWUXFWXUDO DQG WKHUPRG\QDPLF LQIRUPDWLRQ FDQ EH REWDLQHG $Q LPSRUWDQW IDFWRU FRQWULEXWLQJ WR WKH JUHDW YHUVDWLOLW\ RI )7,&5 LV WKDW WDLORUHG SXOVH VHTXHQFHV FDQ EH DSSOLHG LQ DOPRVW DQ\ FRPELQDWLRQ
PAGE 29
&+$37(5 (;3(5,0(17$/ 352&('85(6 $1' 5(68/76 3UHSDUDWLRQ RI 7ULVKH[DIOXRURDFHW\ODFHWRQDWHf &RPSOH[HV 6FDQGLXP DQG JDOOLXP WULVKH[DIOXRURDFHW\ODFHWRQDWHf 7R DQ DTXHRXV VROXWLRQ FRQWDLQLQJ DSSUR[LPDWHO\ JUDP RI VFDQGLXP RU JDOOLXP FKORULGH DQ H[FHVV RI DPPRQLD VROXWLRQ ZDV DGGHG ZKLFK SUHFLSLWDWHG 6F2+fM RU *D2+f UHVSHFWLYHO\ 7KH SUHFLSLWDWH ZDV ILOWHUHG ZDVKHG DQG GULHG DQG WKHQ UHIOX[HG IRU RQH KRXU ZLWK D IROG PRODU H[FHVV RI KH[DIOXRURDFHW\ODFHWRQH b LQ OLJKW SHWUROHXP HWKHUf :KHQ FRRO WKH UHDFWLRQ PL[WXUH ZDV ILOWHUHG DQG WKH ILOWUDWH HYDSRUDWHG WR \LHOG FRORUOHVV FU\VWDOV 6FKIDFff RU SDOH RUDQJH FU\VWDOV *DKIDFff 7KH FU\VWDOV ZHUH VXEOLPHG DW f WRUU DQG r& WR HIIHFW IXUWKHU SXULILFDWLRQ 7LWDQLXP DQG YDQDGLXP WULVKH[DIOXRURDFHW\ODFHWRQDWHf %RWK WKHVH FRPSOH[HV DUH DLU VHQVLWLYH DQG SUHSDUDWLRQ ZDV DFKLHYHG E\ XVLQJ VWDQGDUG WHFKQLTXHV LQYROYLQJ 6FKOHQN WXEHV DQG D 6FKOHQN DUJRQYDFXXP PDQLIROG $ IROG PRODU H[FHVV RI KH[DIOXRURDFHW\ODFHWRQH b LQ OLJKW SHWUROHXP HWKHUf ZDV DGGHG WR DSSUR[LPDWHO\ JUDP RI 9& RU 7L&O LQ D 6FKOHQN WXEH DJDLQVW D IORZ RI DUJRQ 7KH PL[WXUH ZDV UHIOX[HG IRU WKUHH KRXUV XQGHU D EODQNHW RI DUJRQ DQG WKHQ DOORZHG WR FRRO 7KH VROYHQW FRQWDLQLQJ WKH GLVVROYHG SURGXFW ZDV GHFDQWHG IURP DQ\ XQUHDFWHG VROLGV LQWR D VHFRQG 6FKOHQN WXEH ZKLFK KDG EHHQ SXUJHG ZLWK DUJRQ SULRU WR WKH WUDQVIHUHQFH E\ XVLQJ D FDQQXOD ZLWK ILOWHU DWWDFKPHQW 7KH VROYHQW ZDV UHPRYHG E\ YDFXXP WR \LHOG FKRFRODWH b FRORUHG FU\VWDOV 9KIDFff RU GHHS EOXH FU\VWDOV 7LKIDFff 7KH SURGXFWV ZHUH SXULILHG E\ YDFXXP VXEOLPDWLRQ DV DERYH
PAGE 30
&KURPLXP WULVKH[DIOXRURDFHWYODFHWRQDWHf 7KLV FRPSRXQG LV DYDLODEOH FRPPHUFLDOO\ IURP 6WUHP &KHPLFDOV /WG DQG ZDV XVHG DV UHFHLYHG 0DQJDQHVH WULVKH[DIOXRURDFHWYODFHWRQDWHf 7KH PRVW FRQYHQLHQW DQG VLPSOH PHWKRG RI SUHSDUDWLRQ IRU WKLV FRPSOH[ ZDV IRXQG WR EH WKDW UHSRUWHG E\ (YDQV DQG FRZRUNHUV $SSUR[LPDWHO\ JUDP RI 0Q ZDV DGGHG WR D 6FKOHQN WXEH IROORZHG E\ D IROG PRODU H[FHVV RI KH[DIOXRURDFHW\ODFHWRQH b LQ OLJKW SHWUROHXP HWKHUf 7KH PL[WXUH ZDV UHIOX[HG IRU KRXUV XQGHU DQ DUJRQ DWPRVSKHUH DQG WKHQ DOORZHG WR FRRO 7KH UHVXOWLQJ EODFN VROXWLRQ ZDV ILOWHUHG DQG FRQFHQWUDWHG WR \LHOG GDUN JUHHQ FU\VWDOV ZKLFK ZHUH SXULILHG E\ YDFXXP VXEOLPDWLRQ 2QO\ PRGHUDWH \LHOGV RI 0QKIDFf DUH REWDLQHG E\ WKLV PHWKRG EXW VLQFH LW LV VLPSOH DQG FRQYHQLHQW DQG RQO\ PLOOLJUDP DPRXQWV ZHUH UHTXLUHG IRU WKH JDVSKDVH VWXGLHV UHSRUWHG LQ WKLV GLVVHUWDWLRQ WKH SURFHGXUH ZDV DGHTXDWH &REDOW WULVKH[DIOXRURDFHWYODFHWRQDWHf 7KH PRVW FRQYHQLHQW PHWKRG IRU WKH SUHSDUDWLRQ RI &RKIDFf ZDV DOVR IRXQG WR EH WKDW UHSRUWHG E\ (YDQV 7R DSSUR[LPDWHO\ JUDP RI FREDOW WULIOXRULGH &R)f LQ D 6FKOHQN WXEH ZDV DGGHG JUDP RI DQK\GURXV VRGLXP IOXRULGH ZKLFK LQ WKLV UHDFWLRQ DFWV DV D K\GURJHQ IOXRULGH VFDYHQJHU $ IROG PRODU H[FHVV WR WKH DPRXQW RI &R)Af RI FRROHG KH[DIOXRURDFHW\ODFHWRQH ZDV DGGHG VORZO\ WR WKH SRZGHU PL[WXUH DQG WKHQ WKH UHDFWLRQ PL[WXUH ZDV UHIOX[HG IRU RQH KRXU 1RWH WKDW QR VROYHQW LV DGGHG WR WKH UHDFWLRQ PL[WXUH 'XULQJ WKH UHIOX[ SHULRG WKH VROXWLRQ WXUQHG GHHS JUHHQ $SSUR[LPDWHO\ FP RI OLJKW SHWUROHXP HWKHU ZDV WKHQ DGGHG WR WKH UHDFWLRQ PL[WXUH ZKLFK ZDV VWLUUHG DQG WKHQ ILOWHUHG 7KH VROXWLRQ ZDV FRQFHQWUDWHG WR \LHOG GDUN JUHHQ FU\VWDOV RI &RKIDFf ZKLFK ZHUH SXULILHG E\ YDFXXP VXEOLPDWLRQ
PAGE 31
3UHSDUDWLRQ RI 7ULVDFHWYODFHWRQDWHf &RPSOH[HV $OO WKH 0DFDFf FRPSOH[HV ZHUH SXUFKDVHG 6WUHP &KHPLFDOV /WGf H[FHSW IRU 7LDFDFf 7KH FRPSRXQGV ZHUH SXULILHG EHIRUH XVH E\ YDFXXP VXEOLPDWLRQ 7KH 7LDFDFf FRPSOH[ OLNH 7LKIDFf LV DLU VHQVLWLYH DQG LW LV QHFHVVDU\ WR H[FOXGH DWPRVSKHULF R[\JHQ IURP WKH UHDFWLRQ PL[WXUH GXULQJ SUHSDUDWLRQ E\ XVLQJ 6FKOHQN DSSDUDWXV DV ZDV GRQH IRU 9KIDFf DQG 7LKIDFf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f 3XULILFDWLRQ ZDV HIIHFWHG E\ UHSHDWHG UHFU\VWDOOL]DWLRQ IURP GHJDVVHG HWKDQROZDWHU PL[WXUHV 7KH SURGXFW ZDV IXUWKHU SXULILHG E\ YDFXXP VXEOLPDWLRQ EHIRUH XVH 3UHSDUDWLRQ RI 5XWKHQLXP 7ULVIOGLNHWRQDWHVf 7KH UXWKHQLXP %GLNHWRQDWH FRPSOH[HV LQYHVWLJDWHG LQ WKH SUHVHQW ZRUN DUH 5XKIDFf 5XWIDFf DQG 5XDFDFf 7KH FRPSOH[ 5XKIDFf LV DYDLODEOH IURP 6WUHP &KHPLFDOV /WG DQG ZDV XVHG DV UHFHLYHG 7KH RWKHU WZR FRPSOH[HV ZHUH SUHSDUHG E\ XVLQJ WKH UXWKHQLXP EOXH PHWKRG UHSRUWHG E\ (QGR DQG FRZRUNHUV $SSUR[LPDWHO\ JUDPV RI K\GUDWHG UXWKHQLXP FKORULGH ZDV SODFHG LQ D FP WKUHH QHFNHG URXQG ERWWRP IODVN SXUJHG ZLWK DUJRQ $ GHJDVVHG PL[WXUH RI FPf RI GHLRQL]HG ZDWHU DQG FP RI HWKDQRO ZDV DGGHG 7KH PL[WXUH ZDV UHIOX[HG RQ D VWHDP EDWK IRU DSSUR[LPDWHO\ KRXUV XQGHU D EODQNHW RI DUJRQ 'XULQJ
PAGE 32
WKLV WLPH WKH LQLWLDO RUDQJH FRORU RI WKH VROXWLRQ EHFDPH DOPRVW EODFN $ IROG PRODU H[FHVV RI OLJDQG WULIOXRURDFHW\ODFHWRQH RU DFHW\ODFHWRQHf ZDV DGGHG WR WKH UHDFWLRQ PL[WXUH ZKLFK ZDV WKHQ DOORZHG WR FRQWLQXH UHIOX[LQJ IRU DQ DGGLWLRQDO KRXU GXULQJ ZKLFK WLPH WKH VROXWLRQ EHFDPH UHG 1H[W JUDPV RI SRWDVVLXP K\GURJHQ FDUERQDWH GLVVROYHG LQ FP RI GHLRQL]HG ZDWHU ZDV DGGHG WR WKH IODVN GURSZLVH RYHU D SHULRG RI KRXUV ZKLOH WKH UHDFWLRQ PL[WXUH ZDV FRQWLQXHG WR EH UHIOX[HG 7KH IODVN ZDV FRROHG DQG WKH VROYHQW ZDV HYDSRUDWHG E\ XVLQJ D URWDU\ HYDSRUDWRU %HQ]HQH ZDV DGGHG WR WKH IODVN WR GLVVROYH WKH UHG UHVLGXH ZKLFK ZDV WKHQ ZDVKHG ZLWK WKUHH FPn SRUWLRQV RI 0 VRGLXP K\GUR[LGH VROXWLRQ 7KH ZDVKHG EHQ]HQH VROXWLRQ ZDV GULHG E\ VWDQGLQJ RYHU DQK\GURXV VRGLXP VXOIDWH )LQDOO\ WKH SURGXFW ZDV SXULILHG E\ ORDGLQJ RQWR D FKURPDWRJUDSK\ FROXPQ SDFNHG ZLWK PHVK DOXPLQD 7KH FROXPQ ZDV HOXWHG ZLWK EHQ]HQH DQG WKH UHVXOWLQJ VROXWLRQ FRQFHQWUDWHG WR \LHOG RUDQJH FU\VWDOV 5XDFDFff RU UHGRUDQJH FU\VWDOV 5XWIDFff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
PAGE 33
GHSHQGHQFH RI WKH SRSXODWLRQV RI SDUHQW QHJDWLYH LRQV IRUPHG IURP D PL[WXUH RI NQRZQ SDUWLDO SUHVVXUHV RI WZR UHDFWDQWV DUH PRQLWRUHG DV WKH\ FKDUJH WUDQVIHU ZLWK WKH QHXWUDOV )RU WKH UHDFWLRQV LQGLFDWHG LQ HT WKH IUHH HQHUJ\ LQYROYHG IRU HOHFWURQ FDSWXUH E\ VSHFLHV % FDQ EH EUDFNHWHG ZLWKLQ WKH ORZHU OLPLW RI WKH NQRZQ YDOXH IRU $ DQG WKH XSSHU OLPLW RI WKH NQRZQ YDOXH IRU & $f % $ %f %f & % &f :KHQ WKH IUHH HQHUJ\ FKDQJH LV VPDOO NFDO ZLWK )7,&5f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
PAGE 34
7KH FKDUJHWUDQVIHU HTXLOLEULXP PHWKRG KDV EHHQ XVHG LQ ,&5 H[SHULPHQWVn DQG 3+306 H[SHULPHQWV WR SURYLGH HOHFWURQ DWWDFKPHQW HQHUJLHV IRU D ODUJH QXPEHU RI RUJDQLF FRPSRXQGV )RU PDQ\ RI WKH RUJDQLF FRPSRXQGV VWXGLHG WKH FRUUHVSRQGLQJ HQWURS\ FKDQJH $6 rf DQG HQWKDOS\ FKDQJH $+ U[Q f KDYH EHHQ REWDLQHG E\ IROORZLQJ WKH WHPSHUDWXUH GHSHQGHQFH RI WKH HTXLOLEULXPnnAn 7KH UHVXOWV KDYH SURGXFHG RI PXOWLSOH RYHUODSSLQJ YDOXHV RI $*A $+ DQG $6 U[Q U[Q SDLUV RI RUJDQLF UHDFWDQWV VXFK DV VXEVWLWXWHG EHQ]RSKHQRQHV U[Q QLWUREHQ]HQHVnnnn TXLRQHVAn DQG GLFDUERQ\OV 7KH DEVROXWH YDOXHV IRU HOHFWURQ FDSWXUH E\ HDFK FRPSRXQG GHILQHG E\ $* r $+ DQG G $6Dr IRU WKH UHDFWLRQ $ H $nf DUH REWDLQHG E\ LQFOXGLQJ DQ H[WHUQDO VWDQGDUG LQ WKH ODGGHUV IRU ZKLFK $+ DQG $6 r DUH ZHOO HVWDEOLVKHG D D )RU H[DPSOH WKH ($ RI 6 KDV EHHQ DFFXUDWHO\ GHWHUPLQHG WR EH s H9A DQG s H9 LQ WZR LQGHSHQGHQW LQYHVWLJDWLRQV RI WKH SKRWRHOHFWURQ VSHFWURVFRS\ RI 6f DQG 6 LV WKH UHIHUHQFH FRPSRXQG FKRVHQ LQ WKH ($ LQYHVWLJDWLRQV RI .HEDUOH 7KH YDOXH IRU $6Br D ZDV HYDOXDWHG E\ WKH PHWKRGV RI VWDWLVWLFDO PHFKDQLFV IURP VWUXFWXUDO DQG VSHFWURVFRSLF GDWD (OHFWURQ DWWDFKPHQW DQG HOHFWURQ WUDQVIHU HTXLOLEULXP VWXGLHV XVLQJ WKH 1LFROHW )706 *DVSKDVH FKDUJHWUDQVIHU UHDFWLRQV RI WKH W\SH RXWOLQHG LQ HT DQG LQ HT ZHUH VWXGLHG LQ WKH SUHVHQW ZRUN E\ XVLQJ D 1LFROHW )706 )RXULHU WUDQVIRUP LRQ F\FORWURQ UHVRQDQFH PDVV VSHFWURPHWHU )7,&5f $ GLDJUDP RI WKH LQVWUXPHQW XVHG LV JLYHQ LQ )LJXUH 7KH WHFKQLTXH XVHG LQ WKH SUHVHQW ZRUN ZDV VLPLODU WR WKDW UHSRUWHG SUHYLRXVO\ LQ LRQ F\FORWURQ UHVRQDQFH PDVV VSHFWURPHWU\ ,&5f DQG SXOVHG KLJK SUHVVXUH PDVV VSHFWURPHWU\ 3+306f LQYHVWLJDWLRQV 7KH WHPSHUDWXUH RI WKH UHDFWLRQ FHOO ZDV PHDVXUHG XQGHU QRUPDO RSHUDWLQJ FRQGLWLRQV WR EH )RU WKH HOHFWURQWUDQVIHU UHDFWLRQV VWXGLHG LQ ZKLFK D FKDUJHWUDQVIHU HTXLOLEULXP ZDV REVHUYHG EHWZHHQ DQ RUJDQLF UHIHUHQFH FRPSRXQG DQG D PHWDO FRPSOH[ WKH YDOXH RI $* IRU WKH FRPSOH[ ZDV REWDLQHG IURP WKH YDOXH RI $* JLYHQ E\ WKH p U [Q
PAGE 35
)LJXUH 6FKHPDWLF GLDJUDP RI WKH 1LFROHW )706
PAGE 36
PHDVXUHG HTXLOLEULXP FRQVWDQW DQG D YDOXH RI $* r IRU WKH RUJDQLF R FRPSRXQG DW WKH UHDFWLRQ WHPSHUDWXUH RI REWDLQHG IRU HDFK RUJDQLF FRPSRXQG IURP WKH WDEXODWHG YDOXHV RI $+Jr DQG $6Jrf 0RVW RI WKH RUJDQLF FRPSRXQGV DQG WKH 0KIDFf FRPSOH[HV ZHUH VXIILFLHQWO\ YRODWLOH WR DGPLW LQWR WKH PDVV VSHFWURPHWHU WKURXJK OHDN YDOYHV ZLWKRXW KHDWLQJ /HVV YRODWLOH RUJDQLFV DQG WKH 0DFDFf FRPSOH[HV ZHUH VXEOLPHG RII WKH b WLS RI D VROLGV SUREH SODFHG ZHOO DZD\ IURP WKH LRQ WUDS ZKLFK ZDV DW D WHPSHUDWXUH RI a 1HJDWLYH LRQV ZHUH SURGXFHG IURP QHXWUDOV LQ WKH )7,&5 WUDS E\ FDSWXUH RI ORZ HQHUJ\ HOHFWURQV 9f (OHFWURQ FDSWXUH E\ WKH PHWDO FRPSOH[HV ZDV LQ PRVW FDVHV DFFRPSDQLHG E\ YDU\LQJ DPRXQWV RI IUDJPHQWDWLRQ 3DUHQW LRQV ZHUH VHOHFWHG IURP WKHVH IUDJPHQWV E\ LRQ HMHFWLRQ WHFKQLTXHV 7R DSSURDFK FROOLVLRQDO WKHUPDOL]DWLRQ RI LRQV SULRU WR WKH LRQPROHFXOH UHDFWLRQ )7,&5 UHOLHV RQ D VHW WKHUPDOL]DWLRQ SHULRG EHWZHHQ LRQL]DWLRQ DQG GHWHFWLRQ RI SURGXFW LRQV 7\SLFDO UHDFWLRQ SUHVVXUHV LQ WKLV VWXG\ ZHUH LQ WKH n WRUU UDQJH EXW D EDWK JDV VXFK DV DUJRQ RU F\FORKH[DQH FDQ EH DGGHG WR UHDFWDQW PL[WXUHV LI ORZHU UHDFWDQW SUHVVXUHV DUH XVHG )RU ERWK EUDFNHWLQJ DQG HTXLOLEULXP H[SHULPHQWV D WKHUPDOL]DWLRQ SHULRG RI V ZDV XVHG $VVXPLQJ D VHFRQG RUGHU FROOLVLRQ UDWH FRQVWDQW RI n FP PROHFXOHn VHF DW D WRWDO SUHVVXUH RI n WRUU HDFK LRQ FROOLGHV DQ DYHUDJH RI DERXW WLPHV ZLWK QHXWUDO UHDFWDQW PROHFXOHV EHIRUH FKDUJHWUDQVIHU UHDFWLRQV ZHUH IROORZHG :KHQ D FKDUJHWUDQVIHU HTXLOLEULXP ZDV REVHUYHG WKH LRQ SRSXODWLRQV ZHUH GHWHUPLQHG E\ PHDVXULQJ WKH UHODWLYH DEXQGDQFH RI WKH WZR SDUHQW LRQV RYHU VXLWDEOH WLPH LQWHUYDOV XQWLO WKH\ UHDFKHG D FRQVWDQW YDOXH 7KH HTXLOLEUDWLRQ FRXOG EH IROORZHG IRU ORQJ UHDFWLRQ WLPHV WR f Vf HQVXULQJ FRPSOHWH WKHUPDOL]DWLRQ $W WKH UHDFWDQW b SUHVVXUHV LQ WKLV VWXG\ HTXLOLEULXP ZDV XVXDOO\ HVWDEOLVKHG ZLWKLQ a VHFRQGV DQG LRQ ORVV IURP WKH FHOO ZDV QHJOLJLEOH GXULQJ WKLV WLPH (MHFWLRQ RI HDFK SDUHQW LRQ SULRU WR HTXLOLEULXP ZDV WR VKRZ WKDW HTXLOLEULXP FRQVWDQWV REWDLQHG GR QRW GHSHQG RQ GLUHFWLRQ RI DSSURDFK WR
PAGE 37
HTXLOLEULXP 7KH HOHFWURQ DWWDFKPHQW HQHUJLHV IRU DOO WKH FRPSRXQGV VWXGLHG DUH SUHVHQWHG LQ 7DEOH 7KH UHVXOWV DUH DOVR SUHVHQWHG LQ )LJXUH WR LOOXVWUDWH WKH RUJDQLF UHIHUHQFH FRPSRXQGV WKDW ZHUH XVHG LQ WKH SUHVHQW ZRUN 7DEOH )UHH (QHUDLHV RI (OHFWURQ $WWDFKPHQW NFDO IRU 0DFDFf 0WIDFf DQG 0KIDFf &RPSOH[HV 6FKIDFf s & 6FDFDFf 7LKIDFf s & 7LDFDFf 9KIDFf s E 9DFDFf s E &UKIDFf s & &UDFDFf s OF 0QKIDFf fD 0QDFDFf s & )HKIDFf fD )HDFDFf s E &RKIDFf f &RDFDFf s & *DKIDFf s E *DDFDFf 5XKIDFf fD 5XDFDFf s E 5XWIDFf E s E DW (VWLPDWHG YDOXHV REWDLQHG E\ DGGLQJ NFDO PRO WR FRUUHVSRQGLQJ YDOXH IRU 0DFDFf FRPSOH[ VHH WH[Wf A9DOXH REWDLQHG IURP PHDVXUHG HTXLOLEULXP FRQVWDQW 5HIHUHQFH FRPSRXQGV JLYHQ LQ )LJXUH F9DOXH REWDLQHG E\ EUDFNHWLQJ VHH HT f
PAGE 38
&KORULQH DWRP 0QKIDFf f &RKIDFf f K )HKIDFf f -f§5XKIDFf f &1 &1 &1 & & &1 9KIDFf ) ) &O &O 7LKIDFf U 5XWIDF@WM 2 &UKIDFf 6FIKIDFA 2 ) ) &1 &O r r &O *DKIDFf 0QDFDFfA 12RY 1&! 2 2 &RDFDFf 2 )HDFDFf 2 &1 f§ 5XDFDFf 1+ 2 9DFDFf QR! FK FK FK &ULDFDFA )LJXUH )UHH HQHUJLHV RI HOHFWURQ DWWDFKPHQW NFDO PROff WR 0DFDFfA DQG 0KIDFfA FRPSOH[HV DW f DQG UHIHUHQFH FRPSRXQGV XVHG $ FRQWLQXRXV OLQH OLQNLQJ DQ RUJDQLF FRPSRXQG DQG D PHWDO FRPSOH[ LQGLFDWHV WKH YDOXH IRU WKH FRPSOH[ ZDV REWDLQHG IURP D PHDVXUHG HJXLOLEULXP FRQVWDQW $UURZV LQGLFDWH WKH FRPSRXQGV RI JUHDWHU DQG ORZHU $*Dr YDOXHV XVHG WR EUDFNHW WKH YDOXH IRU WKH PHWDO FRPSOH[ HT f 9DOXHV IRU 0KIDFf ZLWK 0 0Q &R DQG )H DUH HVWLPDWHV VHH WH[Wf
PAGE 39
(OHFWURQ DWWDFKPHQW HQHUJ\ RI DFDFr UDGLFDO 7KH HOHFWURQ DWWDFKPHQW HQHUJ\ RI DFHW\ODFHWRQDWH UDGLFDO ZDV GHWHUPLQHG E\ WKH EUDFNHWLQJ PHWKRG LQ ZKLFK WKH RFFXUUHQFH RU QRQRFFXUUHQFH RI FKDUJH WUDQVIHU UHDFWLRQV LQYROYLQJ DFDF LRQV ZLWK RUJDQLF UHIHUHQFH FRPSRXQGV ZHUH REVHUYHG HT f 7KH DFDF LRQV ZHUH JHQHUDWHG E\ KHDWLQJ &RDFDFf RII WKH WLS RI D VROLGV SUREH WR SURGXFH D ORZ SDUWLDO SUHVVXUH WRUUf RI &RDFDFf LQ WKH )7,&5 PDLQ FKDPEHU $FHW\ODFHWRQDWH DQLRQV ZHUH SURGXFHG IROORZLQJ HOHFWURQ LPSDFW LRQL]DWLRQ RI WKH JDV %\ IROORZLQJ WKH WLPH GHSHQGHQFH RI WKH SRSXODWLRQ RI DFDFn LRQV LQ WKH SUHVHQFH RI DSSUR[LPDWHO\ n WRUU RI HDFK RI D VHULHV RI RUJDQLF UHIHUHQFH FRPSRXQGV LW ZDV GHWHUPLQHG WKDW DFDFn FKDUJHWUDQVIHUUHG WR GLFKORUREHQ]RTXLQRQH EXW QRW WHWUDIOXRUREHQ]RTXLQRQH ZKLFK VHWV WKH OLPLWV RI WKH HOHFWURQ DWWDFKPHQW HQHUJ\ DW s NFDO PRO VHH )LJXUH f &RQVLVWHQF\ RI (OHFWURQ $WWDFKPHQW (QHUJ\ 'HWHUPLQDWLRQV $OWKRXJK WKH ORZHU RSHUDWLQJ SUHVVXUHV RI ,&5 DQG )7,&5 FRPSDUHG WR 3+306 HQDEOH ORZ YRODWLOLW\ FRPSRXQGV WR EH VWXGLHG WKLV DOVR LQWURGXFHV D JUHDWHU XQFHUWDLQW\ LQ WKH PHDVXUHPHQW RI UHDFWDQW SUHVVXUHV 7R FKHFN WKH FRQVLVWHQF\ RI WKH UHVXOWV REWDLQHG LQ WKH SUHVHQW ZRUN ZLWK WKRVH RI SUHYLRXV GHWHUPLQDWLRQV $* IRU WKH UHDFWLRQ $ $, GLF\DQREHQ]HQH % IOXRURQLWUREHQ]HQH ZDV PHDVXUHG )RU WKLV UHDFWLRQ DW .HEDUOH KDV IRXQG $*UY NFDO PROf DQG $6 U[Q U[Q FDO PRO .f JLYLQJ D YDOXH RI $+ RI NFDO PRO ,Q WKH $, )7,&5 DW ZH REWDLQHG $*S[Qr NFDO PRO ZKLFK WRJHWKHU ZLWK WKH SUHYLRXVO\ GHWHUPLQHG HQWURS\ FKDQJH JLYHV $+ NFDO PRO A 7KH GLVFUHSDQF\ RI NFDO PRO SUREDEO\ DULVHV IURP WKH XQFHUWDLQ WHPSHUDWXUH RI WKH QHXWUDO JDV DQG HUURU LQ PHDVXULQJ HTXLOLEULXP b FRQVWDQWV WKDW DUH FORVH WR WKH OLPLW RI GHWHFWLRQ .. f RQ U[Q RXU LQVWUXPHQW 7KH YDOXH RI $*S[Qr IRU WKLV UHDFWLRQ WKHUHIRUH UHSUHVHQWV D YDOXH FORVH WR WKH XSSHU OLPLW RI WKH UDQJH RI YDOXHV WKDW PD\ EH FRQILGHQWO\ PHDVXUHG 7KH GLVFUHSDQF\ FDQ EH FRQVLGHUHG DQ
PAGE 40
HVWLPDWH RI WKH H[SHFWHG HUURU IRU IUHH HQHUJLHV GHWHUPLQHG IRU HTXLOLEULXP UHDFWLRQV DQG FRQVHUYDWLYH XQFHUWDLQWLHV RI NFDO PRO DUH DVVLJQHG WR YDOXHV RI $*Dr GHWHUPLQHG E\ HTXLOLEULXP WR DFFRXQW IRU H[SHULPHQWDO XQFHUWDLQWLHV LQFOXGLQJ WHPSHUDWXUH SUHVVXUH DQG XQFHUWDLQWLHV LQ WKH DVVLJQHG WKHUPRG\QDPLF TXDQWLWLHV IRU PRVW RI WKH UHIHUHQFH FRPSRXQGV (OHFWURQ DWWDFKPHQW WR WULVKH[DIOXRURDFHWYODFHWRQDWHf FRPSOH[HV 7KH 0KIDFf FRPSOH[HV VWXGLHG LQ WKLV LQYHVWLJDWLRQ ZHUH WKRVH RI WKH ILUVW URZ WUDQVLWLRQ PHWDOV IURP 6F&R *D DQG 5X 7KHVH FRPSOH[HV DUH SDUWLFXODUO\ YRODWLOH DQG DUH HDVLO\ DGPLWWHG LQWR WKH )7,&5 WKURXJK OHDN YDOYHV RQ WKH LQOHW V\VWHP ,W KDV EHHQ VKRZQ SUHYLRXVO\ WKDW IRU D VHULHV RI ILUVW URZ WUDQVLWLRQ PHWDO 0KIDFf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f FRPSOH[HV DQG RUJDQLF UHIHUHQFH FRPSRXQGV LW ZDV IRXQG WKDW IHZ KDG $*Dr YDOXHV DV KLJK DV WKDW RI WKH FRPSOH[HV 7KH )H &R DQG 0Q FRPSOH[HV KDG YDOXHV JUHDWHU WKDQ DQ\ RI WKH RUJDQLF FRPSRXQGV VR IDU UHSRUWHG $OWKRXJK $*Jr YDOXHV FRXOG QRW EH H[SHULPHQWDOO\ PHDVXUHG IRU )HKIDFf &RKIDFf DQG 0QKIDFf HVWLPDWHV ZHUH REWDLQHG E\ QRWLQJ WKDW WKH RUGHU RI WKH $*Dr YDOXHV UXQV SDUDOOHO WR WKH VHULHV RI 0DFDFf FRPSOH[HV )RU WKH VHULHV RI 0KIDFf FRPSOH[HV WKH RUGHU RI LQFUHDVLQJ YDOXHV RI $*Dr DW ZDV IRXQG E\ EUDFNHWLQJ WKH FRPSOH[HV DJDLQVW HDFK RWKHU 5RXJKO\ HTXDO SUHVVXUHV RI YDULRXV FRPELQDWLRQV RI WZR 0KIDFf FRPSOH[HV ZHUH DGPLWWHG LQWR WKH )7,&5 DQG
PAGE 41
LW ZDV REVHUYHG ZKLFK RI WKH WZR SDUHQW QHJDWLYH LRQV SUHGRPLQDWHG DIWHU D FKDUJH WUDQVIHU SHULRG WKH UHODWLYH RUGHU IRU WKH VHULHV RI FRPSOH[HV ZDV GHWHUPLQHG 7KH GLIIHUHQFH LQ $*Dr YDOXHV EHWZHHQ 9DFDFf DQG 9KIDFf ZDV GHWHUPLQHG WR EH a NFDO PROf IURP WKH UHVXOWV RI WZR VHSDUDWH HTXLOLEULXP UHDFWLRQV $VVXPLQJ D FRQVWDQW GLIIHUHQFH RI NFDO PRO EHWZHHQ WKH 0DFDFf DQG 0KIDFf FRPSOH[HV RI WKH RWKHU PHWDOV LQ WKH VHULHV HVWLPDWHV FRXOG EH PDGH IRU WKH 0KIDFf FRPSOH[HV 0 5X )H &R 0Qf VLQFH WKRVH IRU WKH 0DFDFf FRPSOH[HV RI WKH VDPH PHWDOV ZHUH PHDVXUDEOH 9DOXHV RI $* r REWDLQHG LQ WKLV ZD\ KDYH EHHQ SXW LQ SDUHQWKHVHV LQ 7DEOH 7KH VXEVWDQFH ZLWK WKH KLJKHVW DFFXUDWHO\ NQRZQ HOHFWURQ DIILQLW\ LV WKH FKORULQH DWRP DQG &OnJf LRQ ZDV LQFOXGHG LQ WKH VWXG\ RI FKDUJH WUDQVIHU UHDFWLRQV ZLWK WKH PHWDO FRPSOH[HV (OHFWURQ FDSWXUH E\ D EDFNJURXQG SUHVVXUH RI )HKIDFf ZLWK D VPDOO SDUWLDO SUHVVXUH RI EHQ]\O FKORULGH SURGXFHG &OfJf LQ DGGLWLRQ WR WKH LRQV IRUPHG IURP WKH PHWDO FRPSOH[ ,W ZDV IRXQG WKDW ZKHQ DOO LRQV H[FHSW FKORULGH ZHUH HMHFWHG IURP WKH FHOO DQG LWV VXEVHTXHQW UHDFWLRQ ZLWK )HKIDFf ZDV IROORZHG FKORULGH LRQ UHJHQHUDWHG )HKIDFff E\ FKDUJH WUDQVIHU LQGLFDWLQJ WKDW WKH HOHFWURQ DWWDFKPHQW HQHUJ\ RI )HKIDFf NFDO PROf LQ DFFRUG ZLWK WKH YDOXH HVWLPDWHG DERYH &KDUJH WUDQVIHU RFFXUUHG IURP WHWUDFKORUREHQ]RTXLQRQH &OA%4f WR &UKIDFf EXW DQ HTXLOLEULXP UHDFWLRQ ZDV QRW REVHUYHG LQ WKH UHDFWLRQ ZLWK 6FKIDFf DV WKH UHDFWLRQ ZDV KDPSHUHG E\ UDSLG IRUPDWLRQ RI DGGXFW DQG >6FKIDFf@f (OHFWURQ DWWDFKPHQW WR WULVDFHWYODFHWRQDWHf FRPSOH[HV 0DFDFf FRPSOH[HV ZHUH VWXGLHG IRU WKH VHULHV RI PHWDOV 6F&R *D DQG 5X ,W KDV EHHQ SUHYLRXVO\ QRWHG WKDW WKH FURVVVHFWLRQ IRU HOHFWURQ FDSWXUH E\ ILUVW URZ WUDQVLWLRQ PHWDO 0DFDFf FRPSOH[HV LV PXFK ORZHU WKDQ IRU WKH FRUUHVSRQGLQJ 0KIDFf DQDORJV ,QGHHG &UKIDFf ZDV VKRZQ WR KDYH DQ HOHFWURQ FDSWXUH FURVVVHFWLRQ VRPH WLPHV JUHDWHU WKDQ &U DFDF-M 7KLV ZDV DWWULEXWHG WR WKH VL[ HOHFWURQ ZLWKGUDZLQJ &) ULQJ LRQV >6FKIDFf&OA%4@
PAGE 42
VXEVWLWXHQWV LQ WKH IRUPHU 7KH VDPH JHQHUDO HIIHFW ZDV REVHUYHG LQ WKLV UHSRUW IRU WKH FRPSOH[HV RI WKH PHWDOV &U WR &R 7KH RQO\ LRQ SURGXFHG IURP LRQL]DWLRQ RI WKH QHXWUDO JDV ZLWK WKH HOHFWURQ EHDP ZDV OLJDQG DQLRQ EXW XQOLNH WKH 0KIDFf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r IRU WKH 0DFDFf VHULHV UHODWLYH WR WKH 0KIDFf VHULHV DQG WKH YDOXHV RI $*Dr IDOO ZHOO ZLWKLQ WKH UDQJH RI WKRVH RI WKH RUJDQLF FRPSRXQGV LQ WKH UHSRUWHG HOHFWURQ WUDQVIHU IUHH HQHUJ\ ODGGHU ZKLFK H[WHQGV IURP DSSUR[LPDWHO\ NFDO PRO 7KLV HQDEOHG WKH EUDFNHWLQJ DQG HTXLOLEULXP UHDFWLRQV LQ HT DQG HT WR EH IROORZHG IRU WKH HQWLUH VHULHV RI 0DFDFf FRPSOH[HV 7KH &UDFDFf LRQ DOWKRXJK LQLWLDOO\ SURGXFHG LQ WKH )7,&5 FHOO ZDV XQVWDEOH DQG XQGHUZHQW UDSLG ORVV RI OLJDQG LRQ DW D UDWH WKDW LQFUHDVHG ZLWK WKH $ WRWDO SUHVVXUH RI WKH V\VWHP LQGLFDWLQJ D FROOLVLRQDOO\ LQGXFHG GLVVRFLDWLRQ 7KH LQVWDELOLW\ RI WKH &UDFDFf KDV EHHQ REVHUYHG SUHYLRXVO\ %UDFNHWLQJ WKLV FRPSRXQG WKURXJK FKDUJHWUDQVIHU UHDFWLRQV ZDV WKHUHIRUH KDPSHUHG E\ FRPSHWLWLYH OLJDQG ORVV SURGXFLQJ D JUHDWHU XQFHUWDLQW\ LQ WKH UHVXOW PDGH IRU WKH 6F DQG *D FRPSOH[HV 3DUHQW QHJDWLYH LRQV FRXOG QRW EH ? b $VVXPLQJ D SDUDOOHO WUHQG EHWZHHQ WKH 0KIDFf VHULHV DQG 0DFDFf VHULHV WKHQ WKH 6F DQG *D FRPSOH[HV ZRXOG EH H[SHFWHG WR KDYH $*D YDOXHV WRR ORZ IRU IRUPDWLRQ RI D VWDEOH D DQG H[SHULPHQWDOO\ QR SDUHQW LRQV ZHUH REVHUYHG DQLRQ
PAGE 43
$ YDOXH RI $*Dr IRU WKH 7LDFDFf FRPSOH[ FRXOG QRW EH REWDLQHG ,Q FRQWUDVW WR DOO WKH RWKHU FRPSOH[HV VWXGLHG 7LDFDFf RU LWV DQLRQ GLG QRW XQGHUJR GHWHFWDEOH HOHFWURQ H[FKDQJH LQ WKH WLPH VFDOH REWDLQDEOH ZLWK WKH )7,&5 HYHQ ZLWK UHODWLYHO\ KLJK SUHVVXUHV RI QHXWUDO JDV ([RWKHUPLF FKDUJH WUDQVIHU UHDFWLRQV LQYROYLQJ 7LDFDFf ZLWK YDULRXV RUJDQLF UHDFWDQWV ZHUH WRR VORZ WR IROORZ N N L 1LO OX E L XQ fAf RYHU WKH UDQJH RI XS WR H9 RI GULYLQJ IRUFH 7KH FDXVH RI WKLV XQH[SHFWHGO\ VORZ JDVSKDVH FKDUJH WUDQVIHU LV QRW NQRZQ DQG ZRXOG QRW KDYH EHHQ SUHGLFWHG IRU D GFO UHGR[ SURFHVV &KDUJHWUDQVIHU HTXLOLEULD ZHUH REVHUYHG IRU WKH 9 DQG )H FRPSOH[HV DQG UHVXOWV IRU &U 0Q DQG &R ZHUH REWDLQHG E\ WKH EUDFNHWLQJ WHFKQLTXH RXWOLQHG LQ HT *DV3KDVH 6SHFWURSKRWRPHWU\ RI &UKIDFf 7KH JDVSKDVH YLVLEOH VSHFWUXP RI &UKIDFf ZDV GHWHUPLQHG LQ RUGHU WR FRPSDUH WKH VSHFWUXP WR WKDW RI &UKIDFf LQ VROXWLRQ VHH FKDSWHU f 7KH JDVSKDVH VSHFWUXP ZDV REWDLQHG E\ XVLQJ D VSHFLDOO\ GHVLJQHG VDPSOH FHOO ZLWK FP SDWK OHQJWK DQG ILWWHG ZLWK KHDWHG TXDUW] ZLQGRZV DQG VHSDUDWHO\ KHDWHG FHOO ERG\ 7KH ERG\ ZDV PDLQWDLQHG DW D WHPSHUDWXUH D IHZ GHJUHHV FRROHU WKDQ WKDW RI WKH FHOO ZLQGRZV WR A HQVXUH WKDW FU\VWDOV RI &UKIDFf GLG QRW IRUP RQ WKH ZLQGRZV DQG UHQGHU WKHP RSDTXH &U\VWDOV RI &UKIDFf ZHUH DGGHG WR WKH FHOO ZKLFK ZDV WKHQ HYDFXDWHG DQG SRVLWLRQHG LQ WKH FHOO FRPSDUWPHQW RI DQ ,%0 89YLVLEOH VSHFWURSKRWRPHWHU 7KH FHOO ZDV JUDGXDOO\ KHDWHG WR DERXW r & WR SURGXFH D SUDFWLFDO FRQFHQWUDWLRQ RI YDSRU
PAGE 44
&+$37(5 7(50,12/2*< $1' &219(17,216 86(' ,1 *$63+$6( ,21 7+(502&+(0,675< ,QWURGXFWLRQ 9DOXHV IRU WKH HQHUJ\ UHTXLUHG WR UHPRYH DQ HOHFWURQ IURP DQ LVRODWHG DWRP PROHFXOH RU LRQ DUH RIWHQ REWDLQHG E\ XVLQJ VSHFWURVFRSLF PHWKRGV WKDW \LHOG WKH PLQLPXP HQHUJ\ UHTXLUHG IRU WKLV SURFHVV 7KLV HQHUJ\ LV WKH DGLDEDWLF LRQL]DWLRQ SRWHQWLDO DO3f IRU QHXWUDO RU SRVLWLYHO\ FKDUJHG VSHFLHV DQG WKH HOHFWURQ DIILQLW\ ($f IRU DQLRQLF VSHFLHV 0DVV VSHFWURPHWULF PHWKRGV DQG RWKHU WHFKQLTXHV KDYH DOVR EHHQ XVHG WR HVWLPDWH YDOXHV IRU HOHFWURQ DWWDFKPHQW HQHUJLHV DQG LRQL]DWLRQ HQHUJLHV DW 7 DV ZHOO IRU 7 ,Q FRPELQDWLRQ ZLWK RWKHU WKHUPRFKHPLFDO GDWD DO3 DQG ($ YDOXHV SURYLGH IXQGDPHQWDO LQIRUPDWLRQ FRQFHUQLQJ WKH WKHUPRFKHPLVWU\ RI LRQLF SURFHVVHV VXFK DV FKDUJH WUDQVIHU UHDFWLRQV DQG LRQ VROYDWLRQ )RU H[DPSOH H[WHQVLYH FRPSLODWLRQV RI HQWKDOSLHV RI IRUPDWLRQ RI LRQV DW $+Irf GHULYHG IURP VSHFWURVFRSLF DQG PDVV VSHFWURPHWULF GDWD DUH DYDLODEOH 7DEXODWHG YDOXHV IRU $+Ir RI LRQV GHSHQG RQ WKH FRQYHQWLRQ XVHG WR WUHDW WKH JDVSKDVH HOHFWURQHn 7KHUHIRUH D FRQYHQWLRQ PXVW EH XVHG FRQVLVWHQWO\ WR DYRLG HUURUV LQ GHULYHG GDWD 2QH FRQYHQWLRQ WKH WKHUPDO HOHFWURQ FRQYHQWLRQ 7(&f LV ZLGHO\ XVHG E\ WKHUPRG\QDPLFLVWV DQG WUHDWV WKH HOHFWURQ JDV DV D FODVVLFDO LGHDO JDV 7KH VWDWLRQDU\ HOHFWURQ FRQYHQWLRQ 6(&f LRQ FRQYHQWLRQf LV PRUH FRPPRQO\ XVHG E\ PDVV VSHFWURPHWULVWV DQG WUHDWV WKH HOHFWURQ DV D VXEDWRPLF SDUWLFOH 3UHVHQWHG KHUH DUH GHILQLWLRQV RI VRPH LPSRUWDQW WHUPV IUHTXHQWO\ HQFRXQWHUHG LQ GLVFXVVLRQV RI WKH HQHUJLHV RI HOHFWURQ DWWDFKPHQW RU GHWDFKPHQW SURFHVVHV IRU JDVSKDVH LRQV DQG QHXWUDO PROHFXOHV $OVR LQFOXGHG LV D GLVFXVVLRQ RI WKH WZR WKHUPRFKHPLFDO FRQYHQWLRQV LQ FRPPRQ
PAGE 45
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f 0QJf Hn 7KH HQWKDOS\ FKDQJH IRU HOHFWURQ GHWDFKPHQW $+r0Q 0Qf f FDQ EH H[SUHVVHG DV WKH VXP RI WKH HQWKDOS\ FKDQJH DW DQG WKH GLIIHUHQFH LQ KHDW FRQWHQWV RI WKH SURGXFWV DQG UHDFWDQWV DW WHPSHUDWXUH 7 JLYHQ E\ WKH GLIIHUHQFH LQ WKH LQWHJUDWHG KHDW FDSDFLWLHV RYHU WKH UDQJH WR 7 HT f $K r0Q 7 M &S 0 Qf G7 7KH WHUP $(TBT LV WKH HQHUJ\ UHTXLUHG WR IRUP 0Q LQ LWV JURXQG HOHFWURQLF URWDWLRQDO DQG YLEUDWLRQDO VWDWHV IURP 0Q LQ LWV JURXQG VWDWH :KHQ 0Q LV D QHJDWLYH LRQ $HTB GHILQHV WKH HOHFWURQ DIILQLW\ ($f RI 0Q :KHQ 0Q LV D QHXWUDO RU SRVLWLYHO\ FKDUJHG VSHFLHV WKH HQHUJ\ LV GHILQHG DV WKH DGLDEDWLF LRQL]DWLRQ SRWHQWLDO DO3f 7KH YHUWLFDO HQHUJ\ IRU WKH SURFHVV LQ HT XVXDOO\ REWDLQHG IURP WKH UHVXOWV RI SKRWRHOHFWURQ VSHFWURVFRS\ LQYROYHV WKH IRUPDWLRQ RI 0Q ZLWK WKH VDPH JHRPHWU\ DV WKDW IRU 0Q
PAGE 46
,I WKH JHRPHWULHV RI 0Q DQG 0r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r7(&f $+6(&f 57 7KH IUHH HQHUJ\ FKDQJH IRU WKH SURFHVV LQ HT DW D WHPSHUDWXUH 7 FDQ EH ZULWWHQ LQ WHUPV RI WKH DVVRFLDWHG HQWKDOS\ DQG HQWURS\ FKDQJHV HT f $*r0Q 0Qf $+r0Q 0Qf 7$6r0Q 0Qf 7KH YDOXH RI Q LQ HT IRU IUHH HQHUJ\ YDOXHV GHULYHG IURP H[SHULPHQWDO FKDUJHWUDQVIHU HTXLOLEULXP VWXGLHV LV OLPLWHG WR DQG 7KH WRWDO HQWURS\ FKDQJH IRU WKH HOHFWURQ GHWDFKPHQW SURFHVV $6r0Q 0Qff LV HTXDO WR 6SURGXFWVr 6SHDFWDQWVr 6rHf 6r0f r 6r0Qf f DQG FDQ EH ZULWWHQ DV WKH VXP RI WKH WUDQVODWLRQDO URWDWLRQDO YLEUDWLRQDO DQG HOHFWURQLF HQWURS\ FKDQJHV HT $6r0Q A 0rf $6WUDQVr $6URWr $6YMEr $6HOHFr
PAGE 47
6LQFH WKH PDVVHV RI 0r DQG 0Q RQO\ GLIIHU E\ WKH PDVV RI DQ HOHFWURQ 6WUDQVr ARU DQG EH YLUWXDOO\ LGHQWLFDO DQG WKHVH WHUPV LQ HT ZLOO HVVHQWLDOO\ FDQFHO ,Q HT $6WUDQVr LV WKHUHIRUH QHJOLJLEO\ GLIIHUHQW IURP 6WUDQVrH ff 7KH WUDQVODWLRQDO HQWURS\ RI DQ LGHDO JDV RI SDUWLFOHV RI PDVV P FDQ EH SUHGLFWHG IURP VWDWLVWLFDO PHFKDQLFV E\ WKH 6DFNXU7HWURGH HTXDWLRQ HT f ZKHUH 9 LV WKH YROXPH RI WKH JDV N LV WKH %ROW]PDQQ FRQVWDQW / LV $YDJDGURnV FRQVWDQW K LV 3ODQFNrV FRQVWDQW DQG 7 LV WKH WHPSHUDWXUHr T r AWUDQV LQIQPN7@_ 9 ?^ K 1 7KH WHUP $6 HOHF LV LYHQ E\ HT ZKHUH 4HO HF WKH SDUWLWLRQ IXQFWLRQ $6HOHFr 5 OQ 4HOHF3URGXFWVf4HOHFUHDFWDQWVf f 7KH HOHFWURQ KDV DQ HOHFWURQLF GHJHQHUDF\ RI DQG HT FDQ WKHUHIRUH EH UHZULWWHQ DV HT $6HOHFr 5 OQ 4HOHF0Q!4HOHF0Q!! 5 OQ 7KH IUHH HQHUJ\ IRU HOHFWURQ GHWDFKPHQW JLYHQ LQ HT FDQ QRZ EH JLYHQ DFFRUGLQJ WR WKH WZR FRQYHQWLRQV 7KH WKHUPDO HOHFWURQ FRQYHQWLRQ LQFOXGHV WKH WHUPV IRU WKH HOHFWURQ JDV DQG $*r IRU HOHFWURQ GHWDFKPHQW LV JLYHQ E\ HT r$OWKRXJK WKH 6DFNXU7HWURGH HTXDWLRQ JLYHV JRRG DJUHHPHQW EHWZHHQ H[SHULPHQW DQG WKHRU\ IRU WKH WUDQVODWLRQDO HQWURS\ RI DQ DWRPLF RU f PROHFXODU JDV WKH HTXDWLRQ SUHGLFWV QHJDWLYH HQWURSLHV IRU 7 IRU D SDUWLFOH ZLWK WKH PDVV RI DQ HOHFWURQ 7KH DVVLJQPHQW RI WKH HOHFWURQ JDV DV DQ LGHDO JDV LV D FRPSOHWHO\ DUELWUDU\ FRQYHQWLRQ VLQFH LW LV ZHOO NQRZQ WKDW D PROH RI JDVHRXV HOHFWURQV LV PRUH UHDOLVWLFDOO\ GHVFULEHG E\ )HUPL'LUDF VWDWLVWLFV UDWKHU WKDQ %ROW]PDQQ VWDWLVWLFV XQGHU DOPRVW DOO H[SHULPHQWDO FRQGLWLRQV
PAGE 48
7 7 $* r 7(&f $(B &S0QfOf G7 MFS 0 Qf G7 _U7 7$6URW $6YLE 5 OQ4HOHF0Qf4HOHF0Qff 6WUDQVHf 5 ,Q f 7KH VWDWLRQDU\ HOHFWURQ FRQYHQWLRQ QHJOHFWV DOO WHUPV IRU WKH HOHFWURQ JDV DQG $*r RI HOHFWURQ GHWDFKPHQW LV JLYHQ E\ HT 7 7 $* r 6(&f $(B -FS0frf G7 &S 0 Qf G7 7 $6URW $6YME 5 OQ4HOHF0Qf4HOHF0Qf f f 7KH WHPSHUDWXUH DW ZKLFK WKH WZR FRQYHQWLRQV JLYH WKH VDPH YDOXH IRU $*0Q 0Qf IRU DQ\ VSHFLHV 0 FDQ EH IRXQG E\ VXEWUDFWLQJ WKH ULJKW VLGH RI HT IURP WKH ULJKW VLGH RI HT DQG VHWWLQJ WKH GLIIHUHQFH HTXDO WR ]HUR HT f 57 76WUDQVrHff 5 ,Q f &ROOHFWLQJ WKH FRQVWDQW WHUPV IURP WKH 6DFNXU7HWURGH HTXDWLRQ JLYHV WKH GLIIHUHQFH EHWZHHQ $*r YDOXHV IRU HDFK FRQYHQWLRQ DW DQ\ WHPSHUDWXUH HT f >$*r7(&f $*r6(&f@PROn 7 OQ7ff $W $*r RI HOHFWURQ GHWDFKPHQW LV HTXDO WR WKH DO3 RU ($ YDOXHV DQG WKHUH LV QR GLIIHUHQFH EHWZHHQ WKH WZR FRQYHQWLRQV +RZHYHU HT LV DOVR HTXDO WR ]HUR DW DQG WKH WZR FRQYHQWLRQV JLYH LGHQWLFDO YDOXHV IRU $* DW WKLV WHPSHUDWXUH 7KH WZR FRQYHQWLRQV DSSOLHG WR VLPSOH V\VWHPV DUH VKRZQ JUDSKLFDOO\ LQ )LJXUHV DQG )RU 0 K\GURJHQ DWRP $*r+ +f YDOXHV JLYHQ E\ HTV DQG DUH SORWWHG LQ )LJXUH Df )RU
PAGE 49
WKLV V\VWHP WKH KHDW FDSDFLW\ WHUPV IRU + DWRP DQG + LRQ FDQFHO DQG $6SRWr DQG $6 Er DUH HTXDO WR ]HUR 7KH LQWHUVHFWLRQ RI WKH WZR OLQHV RFFXUV DW ZKHUH WKH WZR FRQYHQWLRQV JLYH WKH VDPH YDOXH 7KH YDOXHV IRU HDFK FRQYHQWLRQ DW DUH ZLWKLQ f NPRO DQG VR FDQ EH DVVXPHG WR EH DSSUR[LPDWHO\ HTXDO DW WKLV FRPPRQO\ XVHG VWDQGDUG WHPSHUDWXUH 7KH VLJQLILFDQFH RI WKH UHVXOW IRU WKH K\GURJHQ DWRP FDQ EH VHHQ LQ FDOFXODWLRQV RI WKH DEVROXWH WKHUPRG\QDPLF SRWHQWLDO RI WKH VWDQGDUG K\GURJHQ HOHFWURGHnrn JLYHQ E\ WKH VWDQGDUG IUHH HQHUJ\ FKDQJH IRU HT +DTf H Jf + Jf 7KH YDOXH RI $*r IRU HT FDQ EH H[SUHVVHG DV WKH VXP RI WKH $*r YDOXHV IRU WKUHH HOHPHQWDU\ VWHSVn RQH RI ZKLFK LQYROYHV WKH LRQL]DWLRQ RI D JDVHRXV K\GURJHQ DWRP HT +J! +Jf HJf 7KH YDOXH RI $*r IRU WKLV SURFHVV DQG KHQFH WKH YDOXH IRU WKH DEVROXWH HOHFWURGH SRWHQWLDO RU VLQJOH HOHFWURGH SRWHQWLDOfnn GHSHQGV XOWLPDWHO\ RQ ZKLFK HOHFWURQ FRQYHQWLRQ LV XVHG 7KH DEVROXWH YDOXH RI WKH VWDQGDUG K\GURJHQ HOHFWURGH LV XVHG WR REWDLQ WKH DEVROXWH $*r RI HOHFWURQ DWWDFKPHQW WR PROHFXOHV LQ VROXWLRQ $V QRWHG DERYH E\ FRLQFLGHQFH WKHUH LV YLUWXDOO\ QR GLIIHUHQFH EHWZHHQ WKH WZR FRQYHQWLRQV DW DEVROXWH (r 9f 7KLV DOORZV IRU H[DPSOH GLUHFW FRPSDULVRQ EHWZHHQ GDWD IRU IUHH HQHUJLHV RI HOHFWURQ DWWDFKPHQW WR JDV r SKDVH PROHFXOHV XVXDOO\ REWDLQHG XQGHU WKH VWDWLRQDU\ HOHFWURQ FRQYHQWLRQ WR WKH DEVROXWH HOHFWURGH SRWHQWLDO RI WKH VDPH V\VWHP LQ VROXWLRQ XVXDOO\ GHULYHG XQGHU WKH WKHUPDO HOHFWURQ FRQYHQWLRQ ZLWK QR VLJQLILFDQW HUURU IRU 7 GXH WR PL[LQJ RI FRQYHQWLRQV
PAGE 50
$OVR VKRZQ LQ )LJXUH Ef LV D SORW RI $*r ,f )RU WKLV DSSURSULDWH VSHFWURVFRSLF GDWD LV DYDLODEOHn IRU A DQG WR DOORZ FDOFXODWLRQ RI WKH UHOHYDQW KHDW FDSDFLWLHV $6 r DQG $V r URW n YLE 7KH REYLRXV GLIIHUHQFH EHWZHHQ WKH SORWV RI $*r IRU WKH LRQL]DWLRQ RI + DWRP DQG LV WKDW WKH VORSH IRU WKH LRQ FRQYHQWLRQ YDOXHV DUH RSSRVLWH 8QGHU WKH LRQ FRQYHQWLRQ RQO\ WKH HOHFWURQLF GHJHQHUDF\ RI 0Q DQG 0Q LV FRQVLGHUHG DQG VR $6Br LV QHYHU HTXDO WR ]HUR ,RQL]DWLRQ HOHF RI + UHVXOWV LQ D ORVV RI WKH 6(&f )RU D ,,J HOHFWURQLF GHJHQHUDF\ $6HOHFr 5 ,Q LQ LV IRUPHG IURP D (f VWDWH DQG $6r r 5 J Z HOHF ,Q LQ WKH 6(& )RU PRVW VPDOO PROHFXOHV VXFK DV WKH 7$6 WHUP DULVLQJ IURP D FKDQJH LQ HOHFWURQLF GHJHQHUDF\ ZLOO SURGXFH WKH ODUJHVW GLIIHUHQFH EHWZHHQ WKH DO3 RI D SRO\DWRPLF PROHFXOH DQG $*r RI LRQL]DWLRQ DW 7 7KH GLIIHUHQFH LQ WKH LQWHJUDWHG KHDW FDSDFLWLHV RI DQG GLIIHU E\ RQO\ NPROn DW DQG WKH FRPELQHG YDOXHV RI 7$6SRW DQG 7$6YEr RQO\ DPRXQWV WR NPROn DW VRPHZKDW VPDOOHU WKDQ WKH FRQWULEXWLRQ IURP 7$6HOHFr )XUWKHU WKH HQWKDOS\ FKDQJH DULVLQJ IURP WKH FKDQJH LQ WKH LQWHJUDWHG KHDW FDSDFLWLHV ZLOO DOZD\V KDYH WKH VDPH VLJQ DV WKH HQWURS\ FKDQJH DQG WKHVH WHUPV ZLOO FDQFHO LQ WKH ILQDO H[SUHVVLRQ 7KH SUHGRPLQDQFH RI WKH $6HOHFr WHUP SURGXFHV WKH DOPRVW OLQHDU ZLWK WHPSHUDWXUH DV VKRZQ LQ )LJXUH FKDQJH LQ IUHH HQHUJ\ 6(&f ([DFWO\ DQDORJRXV SORWV RI $*r RI HOHFWURQ DWWDFKPHQW WR DQ LRQ RU QHXWUDO PROHFXOH XQGHU WKH WZR HOHFWURQ FRQYHQWLRQV FDQ EH REWDLQHG E\ SORWWLQJ WKH QHJDWLYH RI WKH HOHFWURQ GHWDFKPHQW YDOXHV JLYHQ LQ HT DQG 7KH $*r RI HOHFWURQ FDSWXUH IRU 6 KDV EHHQ FDOFXODWHG E\ &KRZGKXU\ DQG FRZRUNHUVn DW IURP WKH HOHFWURQ DIILQLW\A RI 62 FRPELQHG ZLWK VSHFWURVFRSLF DQG WKHRUHWLFDO GDWD IRU WKH JHRPHWULHV DQG YLEUDWLRQDO IUHTXHQFLHV 6 DQG 6 7KH FDOFXODWLRQ ZDV UHSHDWHG KHUH ERWK HOHFWURQ FRQYHQWLRQV RYHU D UDQJH RI WHPSHUDWXUHV XVLQJ WKH VDPH GDWD )LJXUH f
PAGE 51
7KH HOHFWURQLF GHJHQHUDF\ FKDQJH LV GRPLQDQW LQ WKH VWDWLRQDU\ HOHFWURQ FRQYHQWLRQ DQG WKH GHSHQGHQFH RI $*r6(&f RQ 7 GHYLDWHV RQO\ VOLJKWO\ IURP OLQHDULW\ RYHU WKH WHPSHUDWXUH UDQJH VKRZQ b
PAGE 52
)UHH (QHUJ\ RI ORQL]DWLRQH9 7HPSHUDWXUH. )LJXUH 3ORW RI WKH IUHH HQHUJLHV RI LRQL]DWLRQ FDOFXODWHG E\ XVLQJ WKH WKHUPDO HOHFWURQ FRQYHQWLRQ 7(&f DQG WKH VWDWLRQDU\ HOHFWURQ FRQYHQWLRQ Df $WRPLF K\GURJHQ Ef 'LDWRPLF LRGLQH
PAGE 53
$* RI (OHFWURQ $WWDFKPHQWH9 )LJXUH 3ORW RI WKH IUHH HQHUJ\ RI HOHFWURQ DWWDFKPHQW WR 62 FDOFXODWHG E\ XVLQJ WKH WKHUPDO HOHFWURQ FRQYHQWLRQ 7(&f DQG WKH VWDWLRQDU\ HOHFWURQ FRQYHQWLRQ 6(&f
PAGE 54
&+$37(5 ,175$02/(&8/$5 (17523< &+$1*(6 )25 5('2; &283/(6 ,192/9,1* &203/(; 0(7$/ ,216 ,QWURGXFWLRQ (QWURS\ FKDQJHV WKDW RFFXU IRU HOHFWURQ DWWDFKPHQW WR JDVSKDVH SRO\DWRPLF PROHFXOHV $6Drf KDYH EHHQ REWDLQHG E\ GHWHUPLQLQJ WKH WHPSHUDWXUH GHSHQGHQFH RI HTXLOLEULXP FRQVWDQWV IRU JDVSKDVH FKDUJH WUDQVIHU UHDFWLRQV .HT LQ HT f E\ WKH SURFHGXUHV GHVFULEHG LQ FKDSWHU 7KH HQWURS\ FKDQJH LV REWDLQHG IURP D 9DQnW +RII SORW RI WKH GDWD 7KH W\SHV RI FRPSRXQGV VWXGLHG WR GDWH KDYH EHHQ SUHGRPLQDQWO\ RUJDQLF FRPSRXQGV ZLWK GHORFDOL]HG Q V\VWHPV RIWHQ FRQWDLQLQJ HOHFWURQ ZLWKGUDZLQJ VXEVWLWXHQWV )RU WKHVH FRPSRXQGV YDOXHV RI $6Jr DUH VPDOO DQG W\SLFDOO\ IDOO LQ WKH UDQJH RI s FDO PROn .f $Q LPSRUWDQW FRQVHTXHQFH RI WKLV UHVXOW LV WKDW $*Jr DQG $+Dr YDOXHV DUH DSSUR[LPDWHO\ HTXDO DQG FRQVWDQW RYHU D ZLGH UDQJH RI WHPSHUDWXUHV ,Q IDFW $*Jr YDOXHV IRU WKH RUJDQLF FRPSRXQGV WKDW KDYH EHHQ VWXGLHG ZKLFK DUH XVXDOO\ PHDVXUHG DW WHPSHUDWXUHV DERYH DUH W\SLFDOO\ ZLWKLQ NFDO PROn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r GDWD IRU RUJDQRPHWDOOLF DQG FRRUGLQDWLRQ FRPSRXQGV ZKLFK LV REWDLQHG IURP VXFK VWXGLHV FDQ EH FRPELQHG ZLWK D
PAGE 55
YDULHW\ RI FDORULPHWULF WKHUPRFKHPLFDO GDWD IRU PHWDOFRQWDLQLQJ FRPSRXQGV LQ HQHUJ\ F\FOHV WKDW SURYLGH WKHUPRG\QDPLF GDWD WKDW DUH GLIILFXOW WR REWDLQ E\ PRUH FRQYHQWLRQDO PHWKRGV ([DPSOHV RI WKH DSSOLFDWLRQ RI JDVSKDVH HOHFWURQ DWWDFKPHQW HQHUJLHV LQ HQHUJ\ F\FOHV DUH JLYHQ LQ FKDSWHU 2UJDQRPHWDOOLF DQG FRRUGLQDWLRQ FRPSRXQGV DUH FKHPLFDOO\ GLVVLPLODU WR WKH W\SHV RI RUJDQLF FRPSRXQGV WKDW KDYH EHHQ VWXGLHG DQG LW FDQ QRW EH DVVXPHG WKDW $6Dr YDOXHV IRU WKHVH W\SHV RI FRPSRXQGV ZLOO DOVR EH VPDOO LQ DOO FDVHV 7HPSHUDWXUH GHSHQGHQW JDVSKDVH FKDUJHWUDQVIHU HTXLOLEULXP VWXGLHV LQYROYLQJ PHWDO FRQWDLQLQJ FRPSRXQGV DUH UDUH )RU QEXWDGLHQH LURQ WULFDUERQ\O $6Dr KDV EHHQ TXRWHG WR EH s FDO PROn .fr FRQVLGHUDEO\ KLJKHU WKDQ WKH W\SLFDO YDOXHV IRXQG IRU WKH RUJDQLF FRPSRXQGV WKDW KDYH EHHQ VWXGLHG ,Q SULQFLSOH VLPLODU GDWD FRXOG EH REWDLQHG IURP )7,&5 VWXGLHV LI VRPH PHDQV ZHUH DYDLODEOH WR FRQWURO WKH WHPSHUDWXUH RI WKH UHDFWLRQ FHOO DQG PDLQ FKDPEHU )LJXUH f 8QIRUWXQDWHO\ LQ WKH GHWHUPLQDWLRQ RI $*r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
PAGE 56
FRXSOHV ,U&Ofr DQG )H&1fAff $QRWKHU VRXUFH RI GDWD IRU HQWURS\ FKDQJHV LQYROYLQJ WKH UHGXFWLRQ RI PHWDO FRPSOH[HV LV IURP VWXGLHV RI WKH WHPSHUDWXUH GHSHQGHQFH RI YROWDPPHWU\ (QWURS\ FKDQJHV IRU KDOIFHOO UHGR[ FRXSOHV LQYROYLQJ VHYHUDO RFWDKHGUDO DQG WULV FKHODWH FRPSOH[HV KDYH EHHQ REWDLQHG LQ WKH ODERUDWRULHV RI :HDYHU DQG FRZRUNHUVf 7KHVH VWXGLHV KDYH EHHQ SULPDULO\ FRQFHUQHG ZLWK WKH UHODWLRQVKLS EHWZHHQ WKH UDWH RI HOHFWURQ WUDQVIHU SURFHVVHV EHWZHHQ PHWDO FHQWHUV LQ VROXWLRQ DQG WKH HQWKDOSLF DQG HQWURSLF FRQWULEXWLRQV WR WKH RYHUDOO GULYLQJ IRUFH RI WKH UHDFWLRQ (QWURS\ FKDQJHV IRU UHGR[ KDOIFHOOV $VBrf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f DQG )H&1fBAf ZKLFK ZHUH RULJLQDOO\ UHSRUWHG E\ /RZHQVFKXVV DQG 0DUFXV EXW WKH UHVXOWV DUH GLVFXVVHG LQ WKH FRQWH[W RI WKH IDFWRUV WKDW JRYHUQ WKH PDJQLWXGH RI LQWUDPROHFXODU HQWURS\ FKDQJHV LQ UHGR[ FRXSOHV &DOFXODWLRQV DUH DOVR
PAGE 57
SHUIRUPHG IRU WKH LRQV LQ WKH FRXSOHV 5X 1+Mf IU &R 1+f DQG :&OrA &RPSDULVRQV DUH PDGH ZKHUH SRVVLEOH EHWZHHQ WKH WKHRUHWLFDO GDWD REWDLQHG KHUH DQG WKH H[SHULPHQWDO GDWD UHSRUWHG LQ WKH OLWHUDWXUH 7KH LQVLJKW JDLQHG LV XVHG WR SURYLGH HVWLPDWHV IRU WKH JDVSKDVH HQWURS\ FKDQJHV WKDW RFFXU IRU HOHFWURQ DWWDFKPHQW WR 0DFDFf DQG 0KIDFf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ff 7KH WRWDO FKDQJH LQ HQWURS\ LQ WKH DEVHQFH RI VROYHQW FDQ EH H[SUHVVHG DV WKH VXP RI WKH WUDQVODWLRQDO URWDWLRQDO YLEUDWLRQDO DQG HOHFWURQLF HQWURS\ FRQWULEXWLRQV HT f $6JDVf $VAWUDQVf $6URWf $6A YLEfr $6HOHFf 7KH FRQWULEXWLRQV $6WUDQVfr $6YLEf HWF IRU LGHDO JDVHV FDQ EH HYDOXDWHG E\ XVLQJ WKH PHWKRGV RI VWDWLVWLFDO WKHUPRG\QDPLFV 7KHUPRG\QDPLF IXQFWLRQV FDQ EH UHDGLO\ FDOFXODWHG IURP WKH DSSURSULDWH SDUWLWLRQ IXQFWLRQ WUDQV TYOWfI HWFfI ZKLFK LV D VXPPDWLRQ RYHU DOO DYDLODEOH HQHUJ\ VWDWHV WKDW DUH WKHUPDOO\ SRSXODWHG HT
PAGE 58
7KH YDOXH RI T LQ HT DW D JLYHQ WHPSHUDWXUH LV GHSHQGHQW RQ WKH GHJHQHUDF\ RI WKH HQHUJ\ VWDWHV J DQG WKH HQHUJ\ VHSDUDWLRQV EHWZHHQ VWDWHV $( 7KH WHUP N LV WKH %ROW]PDQQ FRQVWDQW 7KH JHQHUDO H[SUHVVLRQ IRU WKH URWDWLRQDO YLEUDWLRQDO DQG HOHFWURQLF HQWURSLHV RI D V\VWHP RI LGHDO JDVHRXV SDUWLFOHV LV JLYHQ LQ ((Sf 7 5 OQT 7KH YDOXHV RI $6URWf $6YLEfr DQG $6A HOHFf IRU JDVSKDVH HOHFWURQ DWWDFKPHQW WR D PROHFXOH FDQ EH IRXQG IURP HT E\ FDOFXODWLQJ 6URWf 6YLEf DQG 6HOHFf IRU ERWK WKH R[LGL]HG DQG UHGXFHG VSHFLHV DQG REWDLQLQJ WKH GLIIHUHQFH EHWZHHQ WKH YDOXHV IRU HDFK VSHFLHV 7R HYDOXDWH WKH YDULRXV FRQWULEXWLRQV WR $6JDVf WKHUHIRUH WKH WZR WHUPV RQ WKH ULJKW RI HT PXVW EH HYDOXDWHG 7KH WHUP ((Tf LV WKH WKHUPDO HQHUJ\ DQG PD\ DOVR EH VHSDUDWHG LQWR ((4fWUDQV ((Tf URW HWF 7KHUPDO HQHUJLHV DUH FDOFXODWHG IURP WKH DSSURSULDWH SDUWLWLRQ IXQFWLRQ JLYHQ E\ HT ((f 57 GLQJ G7 ,Q VWDWLVWLFDO WKHUPRG\QDPLFV FDOFXODWLRQV RI HQWURSLHV WKH H[SUHVVLRQV XVHG IRU $VA URWf DQG $6YLEf DUH DSSUR[LPDWLRQV EDVHG RQ WUHDWLQJ WKH FRPSOH[ DV D ULJLG URWRU DQG WKH QRUPDO PRGHV DV KDUPRQLF RVFLOODWRUV &RUUHFWLRQV FDQ EH PDGH EXW WKH LPSURYHPHQWV LQ WKH DFFXUDF\ RI WKH FDOFXODWLRQV LV VPDOO DQG DUH QRW LQFOXGHG LQ WKH GLVFXVVLRQ KHUH 7KH FRQWULEXWLRQV IURP $6WUDQVfr $6URWf r $6YLEf DQG $6HOHFf WR $6JDVf IRU HOHFWURQ DWWDFKPHQW WR RFWDKHGUDO WUDQVLWLRQ PHWDO FRPSOH[HV DUH GLVFXVVHG EHORZ
PAGE 59
&KDQJHV ,Q 7UDQVODWLRQDO (QWURS\ 7KH WUDQVODWLRQDO HQWURS\ RI D V\VWHP RI LGHDO SDUWLFOHV DW D SDUWLFXODU WHPSHUDWXUH DQG YROXPH LV UHODWHG WR WKH PDVV RI WKH SDUWLFOHV (OHFWURQ DWWDFKPHQW WR D PROHFXOH KDV D QHJOLJLEOH HIIHFW RQ WKH PDVV DQG WKH UHVXOWLQJ FKDQJH LQ $6WUDQVf LV DOVR QHJOLJLEOH 7R HYDOXDWH $6AJDVf WKHUHIRUH QR FRQVLGHUDWLRQ QHHG EH JLYHQ WR $6WUDQVf +RZHYHU YDOXHV RI JDVSKDVH HQWURSLHV RI VLQJOH LRQV DUH JLYHQ EHORZ IRU FRPSOHWHQHVV DQG D YDOXH RI 6WUDQVf LV UHTXLUHG IRU WKLV SXUSRVH 7KH YDOXHV UHSRUWHG LQ WKH SUHVHQW ZRUN DUH JLYHQ E\ WKH 6DFNXU7HWURGH HTXDWLRQ JLYHQ LQ HT WUDQV ,Q HT P LV WKH PDVV RI WKH SDUWLFOH N LV WKH %ROW]PDQQ FRQVWDQW K LV 3ODQNnV FRQVWDQW 9 LV WKH YROXPH RI WKH JDV DQG 1 LV $YDJDGURnV FRQVWDQW &KDQJHV LQ 5RWDWLRQDO (QWURS\ 7KH H[SUHVVLRQ IRU TU4W LV REWDLQHG E\ VXEVWLWXWLQJ WKH TXDQWXP PHFKDQLFDO H[SUHVVLRQ IRU URWDWLRQDO HQHUJ\ VSDFLQJV LQWR HT 6LQFH URWDWLRQDO HQHUJ\ VSDFLQJV DUH YHU\ VPDOO FRPSDUHG WR N7 WKH VXPPDWLRQ FDQ EH UHSODFHG E\ DQ LQWHJUDO 7KH UHVXOW LV JLYHQ LQ HT AURW r1 4Q RK ,$%Ff[N7f 2FWDKHGUDO PROHFXOHV DUH FODVVHG DV VSKHULFDO WRSV DQG WKH WKUHH SULQFLSOH PRPHQWV RI LQHUWLD DUH WKH VDPH 7KH WHUP $%& LQ HT LV WKH SURGXFW ,$,%,& DQG LV JLYHQ E\ ,$%& P5 ZKHUH P LV WKH PDVV RI WKH SHULSKHUDO DWRPV DQG 5 LV WKH GLVWDQFH EHWZHHQ WKH FHQWUDO DWRP DQG DQ\ SHULSKHUDO DWRP ,Q HT N LV WKH %ROW]PDQQ FRQVWDQW K LV 3ODQFNnV V\PPHWU\ QXPEHU IRU DQ
PAGE 60
RFWDKHGUDO PROHFXOH 6XEVWLWXWLRQ RI HT LQWR HT \LHOGV WKH IROORZLQJ H[SUHVVLRQV IRU WKH URWDWLRQDO WKHUPDO HQHUJ\ ((JfURWf 3HU PROH SHU GHJUHH RI IUHHGRP W (f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f 6XEVWLWXWLQJ HT LQWR HT JLYHV DQ H[SUHVVLRQ IRU $6 URWf IRU HOHFWURQ DWWDFKPHQW WR RFWDKHGUDO PROHFXOHV HT $6 URW ,Q $%& U f f§ ,DEF f f UN7 K 7KH WHUPV ,ffUHGf DQG ,$%&R[f $%& DUH WKH PRPHQWV RI LQHUWLD IRU WKH UHGXFHG DQG R[LGL]HG PHWDO FRPSOH[ UHVSHFWLYHO\ ,Q )LJXUH D SORW LV VKRZQ RI WKH URWDWLRQDO HQWURS\ JLYHQ E\ HT IRU WKH PROHFXOHV 0) 0&O DQG 0%U DV D IXQFWLRQ RI LQFUHDVLQJ 0; GLVWDQFH DW ,W FDQ EH VHHQ WKDW DOO WKH SORWV DUH DSSUR[LPDWHO\ OLQHDU RYHU WKH UDQJH RI W\SLFDO PHWDOOLJDQG ERQG OHQJWKV IRXQG LQ RFWDKHGUDO FRPSOH[HV 'LIIHUHQFHV LQ ERQG OHQJWKV REVHUYHG IRU PHWDO FRPSOH[HV WKDW FDQ SRVVHVV PRUH WKDQ RQH IRUPDO R[LGDWLRQ VWDWH DW WKH PHWDO FHQWHU UDUHO\ H[FHHG s ƒ )URP )LJXUH WKH VORSH RI
PAGE 61
WKH SORWV LV FORVH WR DW ƒ DQG YDULHV OLWWOH RYHU WKH UDQJH VKRZQ 7KLV VHWV DQ DSSUR[LPDWH XSSHU OLPLW RI $6URWf RI s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ƒ WR WKH YDOXHV IRU ,U&OAf DQG :& UHVSHFWLYHO\ )RU ERWK LRQV WKH HOHFWURQ LQ WKH ORZHU R[LGDWLRQ VWDWH FRPSOH[ LV DFFRPPRGDWHG LQ WKH WJ QRQERQGLQJ RUELWDO VHW :KHUH VWUXFWXUDO GDWD DUH DYDLODEOH WKLV FKDQJH LQ 0/ ERQG OHQJWK LV W\SLFDO IRU 0; LRQV WKDW DUH VWDEOH LQ R[LGDWLRQ VWDWHV RI VLPLODU HOHFWURQLF FRQILJXUDWLRQ 7KH HUURU LQWURGXFHG LQ WKH YDOXH IRU $6AURWf IURP WKHVH HVWLPDWHV LV VPDOO )RU WKH KH[DF\DQRIHUUDWH FRPSOH[HV WKH URWDWLRQDO HQWURS\ ZDV FDOFXODWHG E\ FRQVLGHULQJ HDFK F\DQR JURXS DV KDYLQJ DQ DWRPLF PDVV RI DPX DQG VLWXDWHG DW WKH DYHUDJH GLVWDQFH RI WKH & DQG 1 DWRPV IURP WKH PHWDO FHQWHU VHH 7DEOH f )RU DPPLQH FRPSOH[HV URWDWLRQDO HQWURSLHV ZHUH FDOFXODWHG IURP DQ HIIHFWLYH 0/ ERQG GLVWDQFH REWDLQHG E\ WUHDWLQJ WKH DPPLQH JURXS DV D VLQJOH DWRP RI PDVV DPX 7KH HIIHFWLYH 0/ GLVWDQFH ZDV FDOFXODWHG IURP WKH DSSURSULDWH 01 DQG 1+ ERQG OHQJWKV JLYHQ LQ 7DEOH
PAGE 62
7DEOH 0HWDO/LJDQG %RQG /HQJWKV LQ 0HWDO &RPSOH[HV &RPSOH[ %RQG /HQJWKƒ &RPSOH[ %RQG /HQJWKƒ ,U&On )H&1f 0/f D s E 0&f &1f D D ,UFOn 0/f )H&1fn 0&f D :& 0/f F &1f D ZFL 0/f G 5X 1+f 01f I &R 1+f 1+f 0/f K 01f H 5X 1+f 1+f 0/f K 01f I &R 1+Mf I 1+f 0/f K 0/f b 1+f 0/f 9DOXHV WDNHQ IURP UHI A9DOXH HVWLPDWHG E\ DGGLQJ ƒ WR YDOXH IRU F9DOXH LQ JDVSKDVH IURP UHI f9DOXH HVWLPDWHG E\ DGGLQJ ƒ WR YDOXH IRU H9DOXH RI 01 GLVWDQFH IURP UHI I9DOXH RI 01 GLVWDQFH IURP UHI 9DOXH RI 01 GLVWDQFH IURP UHI ,U&OaVHH WH[Wf :& (IIHFWLYH YDOXH LV FHQWHU RI PDVV FDOFXODWHG IURP 01 DQG 1+ GLVWDQFHV
PAGE 63
&DO PRO L r L 6ORSH 0%U 0&, 0) 9 0f§/ 'LVWDQFH$ )LJXUH 3ORW RI URWDWLRQDO HQWURSLHV IRU RFWDKHGUDO 0) 0&, DQG 0%U FRPSOH[HV DV D IXQFWLRQ RI PHWDOOLJDQG ERQG GLVWDQFH
PAGE 64
5HVXOWLQJ YDOXHV RI URWDWLRQDO HQWURSLHV IRU WKH FRPSOH[HV 7DEOH ZLWK WKH YDOXHV RI WKH WRWDO VWDQGDUG JDVSKDVH $6M JDVf DUH JLYHQ LQ HQWURSLHV &KDQJHV LQ 9LEUDWLRQDO (QWURS\ 7KH H[SUHVVLRQ IRU TYLE LV JLYHQ LQ HT AYLE 9LEUDWLRQDO HQHUJ\ VSDFLQJV DUH W\SLFDOO\ ODUJHU WKDQ N7 DQG WKH VXPPDWLRQ LQ HT FDQ QRW EH UHSODFHG E\ DQ LQWHJUDO (TXDWLRQ LV JLYHQ IURP D ELQRPLDO H[SDQVLRQ RI HT ,Q HT WKH WHUP [ LV KFXN7 LQ ZKLFK X LV WKH IUHTXHQF\ RI WKH YLEUDWLRQDO PRGH DQG F LV WKH VSHHG RI OLJKW 7KH YLEUDWLRQDO WKHUPDO HQHUJ\ SHU GHJUHH RI IUHHGRP FDQ EH IRXQG E\ VXEVWLWXWLQJ HT LQWR HT 7KH UHVXOW LV JLYHQ LQ HT ,((r@ f >LK 57 6LQFH WKH PDJQLWXGH RI YLEUDWLRQDO HQHUJ\ VSDFLQJV DUH W\SLFDOO\ FORVH WR RU ODUJHU WKDQ N7 WKH YDOXH RI ((Tf E LV VRPH IUDFWLRQ RI 57 SHU PRO SHU GHJUHH RI IUHHGRP &KDQJHV LQ YLEUDWLRQDO IUHTXHQFLHV WKDW RFFXU RQ HOHFWURQ DWWDFKPHQW FDXVH D FKDQJH LQ ERWK TYE DQG ((4fYOE DQG ERWK WHUPV RQ WKH ULJKW RI HT WKHUHIRUH FRQWULEXWH WR $6YLEf 6XEVWLWXWLQJ WKH H[SUHVVLRQV IRU ((fYOE DQG T E LQWR HT JLYHV DQ H[SUHVVLRQ IRU $6YLEf HT f (TXDWLRQ LQFOXGHV WKH VXPPDWLRQ RYHU DOO QRUPDO PRGHV LQ WKH
PAGE 65
&DO PRO b 9LEUDWLRQDO IUHTFP )LJXUH WKH YLEUDWLRQDO IUHTXHQF\ 3ORW RI WKH HQWURS\ RI D YLEUDWLRQDO PRGH DV D IXQFWLRQ RI
PAGE 66
R[LGL]HG DQG UHGXFHG VSHFLHV WKH IUHTXHQFLHV RI ZKLFK DUH LQFOXGHG LQ [5 DQG [4 7KH GHILQLWLRQV RI [5 DQG [4 DUH WKH VDPH DV WKDW JLYHQ IRU [ LQ HT EXW DSSO\ WR WKH UHGXFHG DQG R[LGL]HG VSHFLHV 7KH YLEUDWLRQDO FKDUDFWHULVWLFV RI PHWDO FRPSOH[HV VXJJHVWV WKDW YLEUDWLRQDO HQWURS\ FKDQJHV FDQ EH VLJQLILFDQW LQ FHUWDLQ FDVHV ,Q )LJXUH YLEUDWLRQDO HQWURS\ LV SORWWHG DV D IXQFWLRQ RI YLEUDWLRQDO IUHTXHQF\ DW ,W FDQ EH VHHQ WKDW 6 YLEfr LQFUHDVHV GUDPDWLFDOO\ DV WKH IUHTXHQF\ RI D YLEUDWLRQDO PRGH GHFUHDVHV )RU RUJDQRPHWDOOLF DQG FRRUGLQDWLRQ FRPSRXQGV YLEUDWLRQV DVVRFLDWHG ZLWK PHWDOOLJDQG VNHOHWDO PRGHV DUH W\SLFDOO\ LQ WKH UDQJH RI FPf 6KLIWV LQ WKHVH IUHTXHQFLHV RI WKH PDJQLWXGH WKDW RFFXU IRU D FKDQJH LQ IRUPDO R[LGDWLRQ VWDWH DW WKH PHWDO FHQWHU FDQ FDXVH VLJQLILFDQW FKDQJHV LQ HQWURS\ SHU YLEUDWLRQDO PRGH HVSHFLDOO\ DW ORZ IUHTXHQFLHV 0RUHRYHU D QRQOLQHDU PROHFXOH KDV 1 YLEUDWLRQDO PRGHV ZKHUH 1 LV WKH QXPEHU RI DWRPV LQ WKH PROHFXOHf )RU 0;Â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
PAGE 67
7DEOH $VVLJQPHQWV RI 9LEUDWLRQDO )UHTXHQFLHV FPnf IRU +H[DFKORULGH 0HWDO &RPSOH[HV 8 $ m (J f 7X 7X p 7J 7X ,U&OD E ,U&OnrF ZFLD E :&OnD G E IUHTXHQFLHV WDNHQ IURP UHI E7KH 7 EHQG LV LQIUDUHG DQG 5DPDQ LQDFWLYH YDOXH REWDLQHG IURP X L!f VHH WH[W IUHTXHQFLHV WDNHQ IURP UHI KYDOXH IURP UHI
PAGE 68
7DEOH 0HWDO &RPSOH[HV LDQPHQWV RI 9LEUDWLRQDO FP )H&1frnD 6NHOHWDO 0& X L! 9LEUDWLRQV $ (f LJ J 0&1 L! X 9LEUDWLRQV 7J 7X E &1 9LEUDWLRQV )H&1f D 6NHOHWDO 0& 9LEUDWLRQV X $ LJ X ( X 7 X 0&1 L! Lf 84 9LEUDWLRQV 7J 7X 7J E &1 X 9LEUDWLRQV $OJ D$OO IUHTXHQFLHV WDNHQ IURP UHI E$OO 7J DQG 7X PRGHV DUH ERWK LQIUDUHG DQG 5DPDQ LQDFWLYH YDOXHV JLYHQ DUH IURP WKH QRUPDO FRRUGLQDWH DQDO\VLV LQ WKH UHIHUHQFH LQ IRRWQRWH D
PAGE 69
7DEOH $VVLJQPHQWV RI 9LEUDWLRQDO )UHTXHQFLHV FPf LQ +H[DPPLQH 0HWDO &RPSOH[HV 5X1+fnD 6NHOHWDO 01 X L! L! L! 9LEUDWLRQV $J (J 7X 7X 7J 7X E 7J 7X 7J 7X $PPRQLD 5RFNLQJ F F F 9LEUDWLRQV 5X1+f D 6NHOHWDO 01 9LEUDWLRQV Lf $ LJ L! ( X 7 X O! 7 X Of 7 J X 7 X H H H H E E F F F $PPRQLD 5RFNLQJ 9LEUDWLRQV
PAGE 70
7DEOH FRQWLQXHG &R1+fD 6NHOHWDO 01 9LEUDWLRQV XL $LJ X ( X 7X X 7X X 7J X 7X E 7LJ 7X 7J 7X $PPRQLD 5RFNLQJ F F 9LEUDWLRQV &R1+fnD 6NHOHWDO 01 L! L! 9LEUDWLRQV $ (f @ J $PPRQLD 5RFNLQJ 9LEUDWLRQV F F F )UHTXHQFLHV WDNHQ IURP UHI 9DOXH IRU REWDLQHG IURP L! L!nf VHH WH[W &7 DQG 7 URFNLQJ YLEUDWLRQV DUH LQIUDUHG DQG 5DPDQ LQDFWLYH DQG 7 YDUXH PD\ EH XQDYDLODEOH )UHTXHQFLHV JLYHQ DUH DVVXPHG WR EH WKH VDPH DV WKH 7X PRGH JLYHQ LQ UHI G2QO\ DYDLODEOH IUHTXHQF\ IURP UHI RWKHUV HVWLPDWHG H1R GDWD DYDLODEOH YDOXHV IRU &G1+f IURP UHI )UHTXHQFLHV JLYHQ UHSUHVHQW HVWLPDWHG ORZHU OLPLWV f DQG XSSHU OLPLWV YDOXHV IRU 5X1+ff WDNHQ A9DOXH REWDLQHG IURP DSSUR[LPDWH SDUDOOHO UHODWLRQVKLS EHWZHHQ YDULDWLRQV LQ IUHTXHQFLHV IRU &R DQG &R FRPSOH[
PAGE 71
OLPLW SODFHG RQ DOO HVWLPDWHG IUHTXHQFLHV LV s b 7KH PRVW SRWHQWLDOO\ VHULRXV HUURU LQ WKH FDOFXODWLRQ RI YLEUDWLRQDO HQWURSLHV FRPHV IURP WKH HVWLPDWHG IUHTXHQF\ RI WKH LQDFWLYH 7X VNHOHWDO EHQGLQJ PRGH 7KH IUHTXHQF\ RI WKLV PRGH LV W\SLFDOO\ LQ WKH UHJLRQ RI FP RU VR DQG DQ\ XQFHUWDLQW\ SURGXFHV D ODUJH HUURU LQ WKH YLEUDWLRQDO HQWURS\ VHH )LJXUH f )RU PRVW RI WKH FRPSOH[HV LQ 7DEOHV WR WKH VNHOHWDO 7 X PRGH ZDV REWDLQHG IURP WKH UHODWLRQVKLS L! X f 7KH UHODWLRQVKLS LV SUHGLFWHG WKHRUHWLFDOO\ DQG KDV EHHQ VKRZQ WR FRUUHFWO\ SUHGLFW YDOXHV RI L! IRU VRPH ;< FRPSRXQGV LQ ZKLFK WKH FHQWUDO DWRP KDV D FORVHG VKHOO HOHFWURQLF FRQILJXUDWLRQ )RU G Q RFWDKHGUDO WUDQVLWLRQ PHWDO KH[DIOXRULGHV IRU ZKLFK L! LV DYDLODEOH IURP FRPELQDWLRQ EDQGV RU UHVRQDQFH SKRVSKRUHVFHQFH VSHFWUD WKH UHODWLRQVKLS LV JHQHUDOO\ REVHUYHG WR KROG WR ZLWKLQ WKH HUURU OLPLWV RI s b JLYHQ KHUH )RU 5X1+f GDWD IRU WKH IUHTXHQFLHV RI WKH VNHOHWDO PRGHV KDYH QRW EHHQ UHSRUWHG H[FHSW IRU WKH 7X PRGH VHH 7DEOH f 7KH IUHTXHQFLHV JLYHQ LQ 7DEOH DUH HVWLPDWLRQV EDVHG RQ FDOFXODWLRQV DQG REVHUYHG IUHTXHQFLHV IRU RWKHU KH[DDPPLQH FRPSOH[HV RI 0 LRQV ,Q DGGLWLRQ WR WKH VNHOHWDO PRGHV JLYHQ IRU WKH KH[DDPPLQH FRPSOH[HV LQ 7DEOH IUHTXHQFLHV DUH UHSRUWHG IRU WKH DPPLQH OLJDQG 1+ URFNLQJ YLEUDWLRQV 8QOLNH WKH VNHOHWDO PRGHV WKHVH IUHTXHQFLHV DUH DYDLODEOH IRU 5X1+f 7KH 1+ URFNLQJ YLEUDWLRQV DUH WKH RQO\ RWKHU YLEUDWLRQV RI ORZ HQRXJK IUHTXHQF\ WR FRQWULEXWH VLJQLILFDQWO\ WR WKH YLEUDWLRQDO HQWURS\ IRU WKHVH FRPSOH[HV 7KHUH DUH D WRWDO RI PRGHV 7J 7LXn 7J DQG 7Xf ZKMFK RQO\ WKH 7DQG 7J PRGHV DUH LQIUDUHG RU J 5DPDQ LQDFWLYH IUHTXHQF UHVSHFWLYHO\ IRU &R1+f EXW RQO\ WKH LQIUDUHG DFWLYH 7OX PRGHV DUH r REVHUYHG IRU WKH RWKHU FRPSOH[HV ,W LV DVVXPHG WKDW WKH LQDFWLYH PRGHV VDPH IUHTXHQF\ 7KHVH UHODWLYHO\ KLJK IUHTXHQF\ PRGHV RQO\ FRQWULEXWH D IHZ FDO PRO .n WR $6YLEfr
PAGE 72
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f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r WKH RUELWDO DQG DQJXODU PRPHQWD FRXSOH DQG WKH HOHFWURQLF GHJHQHUDF\ LV OLIWHG )RU FRPSOH[HV RI WKH ILUVW WUDQVLWLRQ VHULHV PHWDO LRQV RUELWDO VSOLWWLQJV DUH W\SLFDOO\ LQ WKH UDQJH RI FPn fN7 N7f 7KH DFWXDO YDOXH GHSHQGV RQ WKH PHWDO LWV R[LGDWLRQ
PAGE 73
VWDWH WKH YDOXH RI WKH 5DFDK HOHFWURQLF UHSXOVLRQ SDUDPHWHU %f DQG WKH PDJQLWXGH RI WKH OLJDQG ILHOG O2'Tf )RU VHFRQG DQG WKLUG URZ PHWDOV WKH HIIHFW LV JUHDWHU DQG RUELWDO VSOLWWLQJV DUH JHQHUDOO\ LQ WKH UDQJH RI FP 'LVWRUWLRQV IURP RFWDKHGUDO V\PPHWU\ 0ROHFXOHV WKDW KDYH RUELWDOO\ GHJHQHUDWH JURXQG VWDWHV KDYH D WHQGHQF\ WR SK\VLFDOO\ GLVWRUW WR PRYH WR D VWDWH RI ORZHU HQHUJ\ DQG ORZHU V\PPHWU\ UHPRYLQJ WKH RUELWDO GHJHQHUDF\ RI WKH VWDWH 7KLV VWDWHPHQW LV D VLPSOLILHG IRUP RI WKH -DKQ7HOOHU WKHRUHP 7KH HIIHFW LV REVHUYHG WR RFFXU IRU RFWDKHGUDO PHWDO FRPSOH[HV )RU H[DPSOH 7L+f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f DQG VR DUH FRPSDUDEOH WR WKH PDJQLWXGHV RI VSOLWWLQJV GXH WR VSLQRUELW FRXSOLQJ )RU WULVFKHODWH FRPSOH[HV V\PPHWU\f D WULJRQDO GLVWRUWLRQ LV SRVVLEOH LI WKH ELWH DQJOH RI WKH OLJDQG LV QRW SUHFLVHO\ r ,Q WKLV FDVH WKH GHJHQHUDWH WJ VHW RFWDKHGUDO V\PPHWU\f LV VSOLW LQWR D VHW RI $ DQG ( RUELWDOV 7KH ( VHW LQ RFWDKHGUDO V\PPHWU\ UHPDLQV D GRXEO\ GHJHQHUDWH ( VHW LQ V\PPHWU\ $Q H[DPSOH RI WKH GHJUHH RI WULJRQDO VSOLWWLQJV LQ 0DFDFf FRPSOH[HV KDV EHHQ UHSRUWHG IRU &RDFDFf 7KH FU\VWDO VWUXFWXUH RI &RDFDFf‘err UHYHDOV DQ DYHUDJH 2&R2 ELWH DQJOH RI r )URP VWXGLHV RQ WKH SRODUL]HG FU\VWDO VSHFWUD RI &RDFDFf WKH $ 7 WUDQVLWLRQ ZDV IRXQG WR EH VSOLW E\ WKH WULJRQDO ILHOG LQWR FRPSRQHQWV DW FPn $f DQG FPn (f WKDW LV D VSOLWWLQJ RI FP
PAGE 74
7KH JHRPHWU\ RI WKH FRPSOH[ LQ WKH JDVSKDVH KDV QRW EHHQ UHSRUWHG 7KH HQWURS\ RI DQ HOHFWURQLF VWDWH FDQ EH HYDOXDWHG IURP HT ,Q WKH DEVHQFH RI D WKHUPDOO\ DFFHVVLEOH KLJKHU O\LQJ VWDWHV WKH HQWURS\ RI D JURXQG HOHFWURQLF VWDWH LV JLYHQ E\ 6 5 ,Q J ZKHUH J LV WKH GHJHQHUDF\ RI WKH JURXQG VWDWH ,I WKHUPDO SRSXODWLRQ RI KLJKHU O\LQJ VWDWHV LV SRVVLEOH WKH HQWURS\ RI WKH VWDWH PXVW EH FRQVLGHUHG LQ WHUPV RI WKH WKHUPDO SRSXODWLRQ RI WKH VSOLW VWDWHV WKDW LV WKH HOHFWURQLF SDUWLWLRQ IXQFWLRQ THLHFf PXVW EH HYDOXDWHG $Q RUELWDOO\ VSOLW VWDWH WKDW FDQ EH WKHUPDOO\ SRSXODWHG ZLOO DOVR SRVHVV D WKHUPDO HQHUJ\ ((TfHOHFf 7KLV WKHUPDO HQHUJ\ PXVW DOVR EH FRQVLGHUHG ZKHQ HTXDW $Q DPSOH DQG WKH VSOLWWLQJ RI WKH GHJHQHUDF\ RI WKH VWDWH E\ DQ HQHUJ\ $( DW WZR WHPSHUDWXUHV LV JLYHQ LQ )LJXUH IRU WKH H[DPSOH RI D ( VWDWH )RU $( WKH HQWURS\ LV JLYHQ E\ 6 5 ,Q J DQG IRU D ( VWDWH WKLV LV HTXDO WR 5 ,Q FDO PROf .nf 7KH VSOLWWLQJ RI WKH VWDWH LV VKRZQ LQ )LJXUH Df $V $( LQFUHDVHV WKH YDOXH RI T JLYHQ E\ Y O &/ r-HO HF Hf$(57ff UDSLGO\ GHFUHDVHV DQG 5 ,Q T UDSLGO\ & O &/ DSSURDFKHV D YDOXH RI 5 ,Q FDO PRO .ff DV VKRZQ LQ )LJXUH Ef )RU $( (f(RfHOHF OQFUHDVHV UHDFKHV D PD[LPXP YDOXH DQG WKHQ DSSURDFKHV DV $( EHFRPHV VR ODUJH WKDW WKH XSSHU VWDWH LV QR ORQJHU WKHUPDOO\ DFFHVVLEOH 7KH YDOXH RI ((RfHOHF AYHQ E\ > H$(57ff Hn$(57ff@ $( DQG KDV EHHQ VKRZQ E\ /LDV DQG $XVORRVF WR UHDFK D PD[LPXP RI m NFDO PROf IRU D ( VWDWH 7KH FRQWULEXWLRQ WR WKH HQWURS\ LV JLYHQ IURP ((4fHOHF7 ZKLFK DOVR VKRZQ LQ )LJXUH Ef 7KH RYHUDOO HIIHFW RQ WKH HQWURS\ RI WKH VWDWH LV WKDW LW DOVR FRQYHUJHV RQ WKH YDOXH RI 5 ,Q EXW UHWDLQV D VLJQLILFDQW DPRXQW RI r LWV RUELWDOO\ GHJHQHUDWH YDOXH HYHQ IRU RUELWDO VSOLWWLQJV DV KLJK DV FPf ,W FDQ EH VHHQ WKDW DW UHODWLYH WR WKH HQWURS\ RI WKH VWDWH LV OHVV GLPLQLVKHG IURP LWV RUELWDOO\ GHJHQHUDWH YDOXH IRU WKH VDPH RUELWDO
PAGE 75
. 5 ,Q r )LJXUH 7KH HOHFWURQLF HQWURS\ RI D ( VWDWH Df 7KH HOHFWURQLF VWDWH VSOLW E\ DQ HQHUJ\ $( Ef 3ORW LOOXVWUDWLQJ WKH FRQWULEXWLRQV RI WKH WHUPV LQ HT WR WKH HQWURS\ RI D ( VWDWH DV D IXQFWLRQ RI WKH VSOLWWLQJ HQHUJ\ $(
PAGE 76
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b DYHUDJH YDOXH REWDLQHG IURP WKH VSLQ GHJHQHUDF\ DQG WKH WRWDO GHJHQHUDF\ )RU 7 VWDWHV WKH VSOLWWLQJ SDWWHUQ EHFRPHV PRUH FRPSOH[ GXH WR WKH HIIHFW RI VSLQRUELW FRXSOLQJ HVSHFLDOO\ IRU ILUVW WUDQVLWLRQ VHULHV PHWDO LRQV 7KH ORZHVW HQHUJ\ PDQLIROG IRU HOHFWURQLF RI WKH VWDWH
PAGE 77
7DEOH (OHFWURQLF (QWURS\ &KDQJHV )RU 5HGR[ &RXSOHV &KDQJH LQ (OHFWURQLF 5HGR[ &RXSOH *URXQG 6WDWH $6M HOHFfD )H&1fffVROQf 7 $ $ ,U&OnVROQf 7 IW :&Of VROQf IW r 7L s &R1+fVROQf D W 5X1+fVROQf W } D s 6F DFDFff JDVf A $ W 7LDFDFfn JDVf 7 r W 9DFDFfn JDVf 7 D & s &U DFDFfn JDVf D } £ H s 0Q DFDFf f JDVf H D $ s )HDFDFfn JDVf D $ W s &R DFDFf JDVf $ $ 7L s D9DOXHV DUH $6 LQ FDO PROn .n &DOFXODWHG IRU F UHG LQ WKH LRQ FRQYHQWLRQ (QWURS\ RI WKH IUHH HOHFWURQ LV QRW LQFOXGHG
PAGE 78
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rf JLYHQ LQ HT $6UrF 6UrHG 6r[ ,QWHUSUHWDWLRQ RI HQWURS\ FKDQJHV IRU UHGR[ FRXSOHV LQYROYLQJ FRRUGLQDWLRQ FRPSOH[ LRQV WR GDWH KDV FHQWHUHG RQ WKH GLIIHUHQFH LQ WKH GHJUHH RI VROYDWLRQ RI WKH R[LGL]HG DQG UHGXFHG IRUPV RI WKH LRQV LQ WKH UHGR[ FRXSOHV &KDQJHV LQ VROYDWLRQ HQWURSLHV DUH H[SHFWHG VLQFH UHGXFWLRQ RI D FRPSOH[ LV DFFRPSDQLHG E\ D FKDQJH LQ WKH FKDUJH RQ WKH
PAGE 79
FRPSOH[ LRQ +RZHYHU GLHOHFWULF FRQWLQXXP PRGHOV KDYH QRW SURYLGHG DQ DGHTXDWH GHVFULSWLRQ RI REVHUYHG $6SFr YDOXHV ,Q SDUWLFXODU WKH DQRPDORXV HQWURS\ FKDQJHV DVVRFLDWHG ZLWK &R,,,f&R,,f FRXSOHV LQ FRPSDULVRQ WR DQDORJRXV 5X,,,f5X,,f FRXSOHVf KDYH HYDGHG VDWLVIDFWRU\ TXDQWLWDWLYH H[SODQDWLRQ %\ FDOFXODWLQJ LQWUDPROHFXODU HQWURS\ FKDQJHV IRU UHGR[ FRXSOHV LQYROYLQJ FRRUGLQDWLRQ FRPSOH[HV E\ XVLQJ VWDWLVWLFDO PHFKDQLFV WKH LQWUDPROHFXODU DQG VROYHQW FRQWULEXWLRQV WR $6UFr FDQ EH HVWLPDWHG 6HYHUDO $6 r YDOXHV KDYH EHHQ GHWHUPLQHG E\ YDULRXV ZRUNHUV DQG D UF X VHOHFWLRQ RI WKH UHVXOWV IRU YDULRXV UHGR[ FRXSOHV DUH JLYHQ LQ 7DEOH 7KH VROYHQW IRU DOO UHGR[ FRXSOHV LQ 7DEOH LV ZDWHU $OVR JLYHQ LQ 7DEOH DUH WKH WKHRUHWLFDO YDOXHV RI $6UFr SUHGLFWHG E\ WKH %RUQ HTXDWLRQ $6%RUQrf 7KH %RUQ HTXDWLRQ LV EDVHG RQ D SXUHO\ HOHFWURVWDWLF PRGHO DQG FDQ EH XVHG WR REWDLQ WKH FKDQJH LQ IUHH HQHUJ\ DQG HQWURS\ ZKHQ D FKDUJH LV WUDQVIHUUHG IURP D FRQGXFWLQJ VSKHUH LQ D YDFXXP WR DQ LGHQWLFDO VSKHUH LQ D PHGLXP RI GLHOHFWULF FRQVWDQW H HTV DQG f R %RUQ $6 $* %RUQ %RUQ G7 T QH? L7H?Q7 ,Q HTV DQG T LV WKH FKDUJH RQ WKH FRQGXFWLQJ VSKHUH DQG H LV WKH GLHOHFWULF FRQVWDQW RI WKH PHGLXP :KHQ WKH PHGLXP LV ZDWHU DW r& DQG WKH VSKHUHV DUH LRQV RI DEVROXWH FKDUJH ]H HTV DQG FDQ EH ZULWWHQ LQ WKH FRQYHQLHQW IRUPV RI HTV DQG $*%rRUQ U$ NFDO PRO L
PAGE 80
7DEOH ([SHULPHQWDO DQG 7KHRUHWLFDO (QWURSLHV IRU 5HGR[ &RXSOHV 5HGR[ &RXSOH $6UFnD $VG rnD %RUQ $6UFr $6%RUQrf $0/ f n DYJ D 'LVWDQFH$ 5X1+fnF H 2V1+fnE s &R1+fnG H 5XHQfE s &RHQfE s 5X+ f nF s &R+fnG )H+fnE 5XELS\fnF s I )H ELS\ fF s &RELS\fF s )H&1ffrnF H D$OO YDOXHV JLYHQ LQ FDO PROf & ADWD IURP UHI F'DWD IURP UHI G)URP UHI YDOXH HVWLPDWHG E\ DXWKRUVf H'DWD IURP 7DEOH I'DWD IURP UHI
PAGE 81
$6 %RUQ Uƒ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r DQG $6'r UF %RUQ IRU HDFK FRXSOH LV LQFOXGHG LQ 7DEOH IRU WKLV SXUSRVH ,W LV SDUWLFXODUO\ LQWHUHVWLQJ WR QRWH LQ 7DEOH WKDW IRU WKH FRXSOHV 5XELS\f ZKHUH ELS\ f ELS\ULGLQHf DQG )H&1fnn IRU ZKLFK WKH QDWXUH RI WKH 0/ ERQGLQJ LV PRUH FRPSOH[ WKDQ VLPSOH D ERQGLQJ WKDW WKH YDOXH RI $6UUr $V%RUQr LV QHJDWLYH )RU HDFK RI WKHVH FRXSOHV WKH DYHUDJH 0/ ERQG OHQJWK LQ WKH UHGXFHG IRUP RI WKH FRPSOH[ LV VKRUWHU WKDQ LQ WKH R[LGL]HG IRUP 7KH DUJXPHQWV JHQHUDOO\ LQYRNHG WR H[SODLQ WKLV SKHQRPHQRQ LV WKDW WKH HQHUJLHV RI WKH PHWDO RUELWDOV DUH UDLVHG LQ WKH UHGXFHG IRUP RI WKH FRPSOH[ ZKLFK SURYLGHV D EHWWHU
PAGE 82
HQHUJ\ PDWFK ZLWK OLJDQG Q RUELWDOV DQG VXEVHTXHQWO\ DQ RYHUDOO LQFUHDVH LQ WKH GHJUHH RI 0/f ERQGLQJ $ UHODWHG DUJXPHQW ZDV XVHG E\
PAGE 83
,QWUDPROHFXODU &RQWULEXWLRQV WR $6 6LQJOH LRQ K\GUDWLRQ HQWURSLHV KDYH EHHQ REWDLQHG IRU PDQ\ PRQDWRPLF DQG SRO\DWRPLF LRQV E\ HYDOXDWLQJ WKH HQWURS\ FKDQJH IRU WKH WUDQVIHUHQFH RI D JDVSKDVH LRQ 0 RI FKDUJH Q WR WKH VROXWLRQ SKDVH DFFRUGLQJ WR WKH UHDFWLRQ 0QJDVf 0QDTf 7KH YDOXH RI $6 IRU WKH UHDFWLRQ LV JLYHQ E\ HT $6L K\Gf r 6L JDVf r 6L DTf r FDO PROB .n 7KH YDOXH RI FDO PROf .f 5 ,Q f DULVHV IURP WKH GLIIHUHQW VWDQGDUG VWDWHV IRU WKH JDVSKDVH DQG WKH VROXWLRQ SKDVH 7KH YDOXH RI 6M JDVf DQG 6DTfr IRU D SDUWLFXODU LRQ DUH W\SLFDOO\ TXLWH GLIIHUHQW WKH YDOXH RI 6DTfr EHLQJ VPDOOHU DQG RIWHQ QHJDWLYH 7UDQVODWLRQDO IUHHGRP LV UHVWULFWHG DQG LW LV XQFHUWDLQ KRZ URWDWLRQDO PRWLRQ ZLOO EH DIIHFWHG $OVR SRODUL]DWLRQ RI WKH VROYHQW PD\ FRQWULEXWH JUHDWO\ WR WKH GLIIHUHQFH LQ HQWURS\ RI DQ LRQ EHWZHHQ WKH WZR SKDVHV $OWKRXJK $6DTf GDWD DUH DYDLODEOH IRU D ODUJH QXPEHU RI SRO\DWRPLF LRQV WKHUH DUH DSSDUHQWO\ QR UHSRUWV RQ FRPSDULVRQV PDGH EHWZHHQ $6JDVf DQG $6DTf IRU LRQLF VSHFLHV LQ UHGR[ FRXSOHV 7KH UHVXOWV RI WKH FDOFXODWLRQV WKDW \LHOG WKH JDVSKDVH HQWURSLHV RI WKH RFWDKHGUDO FRPSOH[HV FRQVLGHUHG LQ WKH SUHVHQW ZRUN DUH SUHVHQWHG LQ 7DEOH )URP WKH UHVXOWV RI WKH FDOFXODWLRQV LW FDQ EH VHHQ WKDW 6WUDQVf LV WKH VDPH IRU WKH R[LGL]HG DQG UHGXFHG VSHFLHV DQG WKDW 6URWf LV ZLWKLQ s FDO PROf .f )LJXUH f ,W FDQ EH DQWLFLSDWHG WKDW WKHVH WHUPV ZLOO DOVR UHPDLQ FRQVWDQW EHWZHHQ WKH R[LGL]HG DQG UHGXFHG VSHFLHV LQ VROXWLRQ 0XFK ODUJHU GLIIHUHQFHV LQ HQWURS\ FDQ SRWHQWLDOO\ DULVH IURP YLEfr DQG 6XHOHHf DQG WKH FDOFXODWHG JDVSKDVH YDOXHV b VKRXOG UHPDLQ XQFKDQJHG EHWZHHQ WKH WZR SKDVHV ,Q FRQVLGHULQJ WKH WRWDO GLIIHUHQFH LQ HQWURS\ IRU D UHGR[ FRXSOH LQYROYLQJ RFWDKHGUDO WUDQVLWLRQ PHWDO LRQV LQ VROXWLRQ WKHUHIRUH HT ZLOO DSSO\
PAGE 84
$6UrF $6L YLEf r $6L HOHFf r $6VRLY ,Q HT AV6LYr LV WKH GLIIHUHQFH LQ WKH HQWURS\ RI VROYDWLRQ RI WKH LRQV LQ WKH UHGR[ FRXSOH 7KHUH DUH WZR VLWXDWLRQV ZKHUH WKH FRQWULEXWLRQ RI $6VROYr WR $6SFr FDQ EH VHSDUDWHG IURP $6SFr VR WKDW WKH FRQWULEXWLRQV IURP $6YLEf DQG $6HOHFf PD\ EH HVWLPDWHG )RU LRQV RI ODUJH UDGLL $6VROYr LQ ZDWHU LV SUHGLFWHG E\ WKH %RUQ HTXDWLRQ f WR EH VPDOO DQG WKHUHIRUH $6UFr $6YLEf $6HOHFf $OVR ZKHQ FRPSDULQJ WZR UHGR[ FRXSOHV RI GLIIHUHQW PHWDO LRQV FRRUGLQDWHG E\ WKH VDPH OLJDQG DQG XQGHUJRLQJ WKH VDPH FKDQJH LQ R[LGDWLRQ VWDWHV $6VROYr LV FRQVWDQW DQG $$6UFr $$6YLEf $$6AHOHFf ,W LV LOOXPLQDWLQJ WR FRPSDUH WKH UHVXOWV RI WKH JDVSKDVH FDOFXODWLRQV ZKLFK DUH JLYHQ LQ 7DEOH WR WKH H[SHULPHQWDO UHVXOWV REWDLQHG LQ DTXHRXV VROXWLRQ ZKLFK DUH JLYHQ LQ 7DEOH )RU WKH LRQV WKDW IRUP WKH UHGR[ FRXSOHV 5X 1+f ,U&On :&f DQG )H&1ff=rf WKH GLIIHUHQFH LQ JDVSKDVH HQWURSLHV LV VPDOO DQG WKHUHIRUH RQO\ $6VROYr ZLOO FRQWULEXWH WR $6SF )RU WKH &R1+f FRXSOH $6JDVf FDO PRO .f 7KH RULJLQ RI WKH FRPSDUDWLYHO\ ODUJH YDOXH RI $6MIJDVf FDQ EH WUDFHG WR WKH GLIIHUHQFH LQ VSLQ VWDWHV EHWZHHQ WKH R[LGL]HG DQG UHGXFHG VSHFLHV ,Q &R,,f FRPSOH[HV WKH 0/ ERQGLQJ LV VLJQLILFDQWO\ ZHDNHQHG UHODWLYH WR &R,,,f FRPSOH[HV DV D UHVXOW RI WKH GRXEO\ RFFXSLHG DQWLERQGLQJ HJ PHWDO EDVHG RUELWDOV LQ WKH &R,,f VWDWH $V D UHVXOW WKH VNHOHWDO YLEUDWLRQDO PRGHV DUH VKLIWHG WR VXEVWDQWLDOO\ ORZHU IUHTXHQFLHV DQG D ODUJH LQFUHDVH LQ YLEUDWLRQDO HQWURS\ UHVXOWV 7KH JUHDWHU HOHFWURQLF GHJHQHUDF\ RI WKH &R,,f VWDWH DOVR JLYHV ULVH WR D VLJQLILFDQW LQFUHDVH LQ $6HOHFf 7DEOH f b 7KH FKDQJH LQ VSLQ VWDWH IRU &R,,,f,Of FRXSOHV KDV EHHQ REVHUYHG WR JUHDWO\ VKLIW VNHOHWDO YLEUDWLRQDO IUHTXHQFLHV IRU RWKHU RFWDKHGUDO DQG SVHXGRRFWDKHGUDO FRPSOH[HV RI FREDOW )RU H[DPSOH IRU WULV FRPSOH[HV RI nELS\ULGLQH DQG WKH UHODWHG OLJDQG SKHQDQWKUROLQH
PAGE 85
n 7DEOH *DV3KDVH 6WDQGDUG 0RODU (QWURSLHV RI 2FWDKHGUDO ,RQV &RPSOH[ 6M YLEfD 6MURWf rD 6M HOHFf 6 f WUDQVfD 6M JDVfD ,U&On 6NHO s s s ,U&O 6NHO s s s :& 6NHO s s ZFL 6NHO s s s s )H&1ff 6NHO s s 0&1 s &1 )H&1fn 6NHO s s 0&1 s &1 5X 1+Mf 6NHO s s 1+Uf s 5X 1+f 6NHO s s 1+Uf s &2 QK f 6NHO s s 1+Uf s &2 QK f 6NHO s s s 1+Uf s D$OO YDOXHV DUH JLYHQ LQ FDO PROn YR
PAGE 86
SKHQf FRPSOH[HV RI WKH VDPH PHWDO LRQ KDYH VLPLODU 0/ YLEUDWLRQDO IUHTXHQFLHV )RU )HELS\f LQIUDUHG DFWLYH 01 YLEUDWLRQV DUH REVHUYHG DW DQG FPn )RU )HELS\f WKHVH IUHTXHQFLHV DUH VKLIWHG VOLJKWO\ WR DQG FP UHVSHFWLYHO\ )RU &RSKHQf VLPLODU IUHTXHQFLHV WR WKHVH DUH REVHUYHG DW DQG FP EXW IRU &RELS\f DUH VKLIWHG WR VXEVWDQWLDOO\ ORZHU IUHTXHQFLHV DW DQG FP /DUJH FRQWULEXWLRQV WR YLEUDWLRQDO HQWURS\ FDQ EH JHQHUDOO\ H[SHFWHG IRU FREDOW FRXSOHV WKDW XQGHUJR WKH VDPH FKDQJH LQ VSLQ VWDWH DOWKRXJK D FRPSOHWH VHW RI GDWD IRU DOO WKH YLEUDWLRQDO IUHTXHQFLHV WKDW DUH GLIIHUHQW EHWZHHQ WKH R[LGL]HG DQG UHGXFHG VSHFLHV DUH UHTXLUHG WR TXDQWLWDWLYHO\ HYDOXDWH $6AYLEf )RU DOO WKH UHGR[ FRXSOHV LQYROYLQJ &R,,,f&R,,f UHGXFWLRQV LQ 7DEOH WKH VDPH VSLQ FKDQJH LV LQYROYHG DQG YDOXHV IRU $6 UF DUH FRQVWDQWO\ FDO PROn KLJKHU WKDQ WKH FRUUHVSRQGLQJ 5X,,,f5X,,f FRXSOHV 7KH GLIIHUHQFH LQ WKH YDOXHV RI $6JDVf IRU WKH FRXSOHV &R1+f DQG 5X 1+fnI REWDLQHG IURP WKH FDOFXODWLRQV LQ WKH SUHVHQW ZRUN LV FDO PRO 7KH UHVXOW GHPRQVWUDWHV WKH LPSRUWDQFH RI LQWUDPROHFXODU HQWURS\ FKDQJHV IRU &R,,,f&R,,f UHGR[ FRXSOHV DQG RIIHUV D IHDVLEOH H[SODQDWLRQ RI WKH ODUJH GLIIHUHQFHV LQ $6UFr IRU WKH 5X,,,f,,f DQG &R,,,f,,f UHGR[ FRXSOHV VWXGLHG LQ DTXHRXV VROXWLRQ 7KH 5HODWLRQVKLS %HWZHHQ 7KH )UHH (QHUJ\ DQG (QWKDOS\ RI *DV3KDVH (OHFWURQ $WWDFKPHQW WR 0DFDFf DQG 0IKIDFfA &RPSOH[HV 7KH HOHFWURQ DWWDFKPHQW HQHUJLHV TXRWHG IRU WKH 0DFDFf DQG 0KIDFf FRPSOH[HV LQ WKH SUHVHQW ZRUN DUH IUHH HQHUJLHV $* rf REWDLQHG Z DW 7KH GDWD ZRXOG VHUYH D ZLGHU UDQJH RI DSSOLFDWLRQV LQ WKHUPRFKHPLVWU\ LI YDOXHV RI $* DQG $+ FRXOG EH REWDLQHG DW RWKHU D WHPSHUDWXUHV ,W LV SDUWLFXODUO\ XVHIXO WR REWDLQ $+ GDWD DW DQG G DW 9DOXHV IRU $+Dr DW DUH WKH HOHFWURQ DIILQLWLHV RI WKH FRPSOH[HV ZKLFK PD\ EH XVHG DQG FRPSDUHG ZLWK RWKHU HOHFWURQ DIILQLW\
PAGE 87
GDWD 9DOXHV IRU $+ DW FDQ EH UHDGLO\ FRPELQHG LQ HQHUJ\ F\FOHV ZLWK FRPSLOHG GDWD IRU RWKHU SURFHVVHV 7KH UHODWLRQVKLS EHWZHHQ $*Dr DW DQ H[SHULPHQWDO WHPSHUDWXUH 7H[Sf DQG $+Dr DQG $*Dr DW D GLIIHUHQW WHPSHUDWXUH 7f LV JLYHQ LQ HTXDWLRQV DQG AH[S $+Dr7f $*Dr7H[Sf 7H[S$6D I &S 0f G7 I &S0rfG7 7 7 ,W LV RIWHQ DVVXPHG WKDW WHPSHUDWXUH GHSHQGHQFH RI $+Dr DQG $6Dr IRU HOHFWURQ DWWDFKPHQW RU LRQL]DWLRQ RI D QHXWUDO PROHFXOH LV QHJOLJLEOH )RU H[DPSOH IRU HOHFWURQ FDSWXUH E\ D VSHFLHV 0 WR IRUP 0f $*Dr .f $+Dr .f WKH HOHFWURQ DIILQLW\ RI 0f DQG HTXDWLRQ KDV EHHQ XVHG E\ .HEDUOH WR TXRWH HOHFWURQ DIILQLWLHV RI RUJDQLF FRPSRXQGV QHJOHFWLQJ WKH LQWHJUDO WHUPV /LDV DQG $XVORRVF KDYH H[SORUHG WKH YDOLGLW\ RI WKLV DVVXPSWLRQ E\ SHUIRUPLQJ VWDWLVWLFDO WKHUPRG\QDPLFV FDOFXODWLRQV RQ VHYHUDO RUJDQLF DQG LQRUJDQLF FRPSRXQGV IURP VSHFWURVFRSLF GDWD $V VKRZQ DERYH DQG VWDWHG PRUH H[SOLFLWO\ E\ /LDV DQG $XVORRV WKH GLIIHUHQFH LQ WUDQVODWLRQDO DQG URWDWLRQDO WKHUPDO HQHUJ\ EHWZHHQ D VSHFLHV 0 DQG LWV LRQ 0r RU 0ff LV QHJOLJLEOH 'LIIHUHQFHV FDQ RQO\ DULVH IURP (f§(4fYLE DQFr (f(RfHOHFr 8QFrHU WKH LRQ FRQYHQWLRQ WKH YROXPH RI WKH HOHFWURQ JDV LV ]HUR DQG VR IRU HOHFWURQ DWWDFKPHQW $3 $9 7KHUHIRUH & & DQG $( $+ /LDV DQG Y S $XVORRV VKRZHG WKDW IURP WKH FRPSRXQGV WKH\ VWXGLHG WKH ODUJHVW GLIIHUHQFH EHWZHHQ WKH DGLDEDWLF LRQL]DWLRQ SRWHQWLDO .f DQG WKH HQWKDOS\ RI LRQL]DWLRQ RI HQWKDOS\ DW DURVH IRU HWK\OHQH ZKLFK ZDV NFDO PROn OHVV H[RWKHUPLF DW WKH KLJKHU WHPSHUDWXUH ,Q RUGHU WR GHWHUPLQH $+Dr7f IRU WKH PHWDO FRPSOH[HV LQ WKLV VWXG\ $6Dr PXVW EH NQRZQ $Q\ XQFHUWDLQW\ LQ WKLV YDOXH ZLOO OHDG WR WKH ODUJHVW HUURU LQ $+Dr7f VLQFH WKH DEVROXWH PDJQLWXGH RI 7H[S$6Dr LQ HT
PAGE 88
FDQ EH H[SHFWHG WR EH VLJQLILFDQWO\ JUHDWHU WKDQ WKH DEVROXWH PDJQLWXGH RI WKH VXP RI WKH LQWHJUDO WHUPV )URP WKH FDOFXODWLRQV JLYHQ DERYH IRU SDLUV RI RFWDKHGUDO WUDQVLWLRQ PHWDO FRPSOH[ LRQV WKDW IRUP UHGR[ FRXSOHV 7DEOH f LW FDQ EH VHHQ WKDW ZKHUH WKH DFFHSWRU RUELWDO LV D QRQERQGLQJ PHWDO WJ $6Jr LV s FDO PRO LV FRPSDUDEOH WR WKH RUJDQLF FRPSRXQGV IRU ZKLFK $6 KDV EHHQ 7KLV YDOXH GHWHUPLQHG H[SHULPHQWDOO\ DQG FDQ EH H[SHFWHG WR DSSO\ IRU HOHFWURQ FDSWXUH E\ WKH 0DFDFf DQG 0KIDFf FRPSOH[HV RI 6F 7L 9 DQG )H )URP WKH UHVXOWV RI WKH FDOFXODWLRQV JLYHQ LQ 7DEOH IRU WKH JDV SKDVH &R1+f FRXSOH D ODUJHU YDOXH RI $6Dr FDO PROf .ff ZDV REWDLQHG ZKLFK ZDV DWWULEXWHG WR D FRQVHTXHQFH RI WKH GLIIHUHQFH LQ G HOHFWURQ FRQILJXUDWLRQ EHWZHHQ WKH R[LGL]HG DQG UHGXFHG IRUPV 7KH VDPH GLIIHUHQFH LQ HOHFWURQLF FRQILJXUDWLRQ LV H[SHFWHG WR H[LVW IRU WKH Jf DQG &R KI DFf n Jf FRXSOHV DQG $6Dr PD\ DOVR EH LQ WKH &RDFDFf UDQJH RI FDO PROf .fr )RU WKH DFDF DQG KIDF FRPSOH[HV RI &U DQG 0Q HOHFWURQ FDSWXUH UHVXOWV LQ WKH IROORZLQJ FKDQJHV LQ G HOHFWURQ FRQILJXUDWLRQ &U W J W J HB 0Q W H n J J WT H J J ,Q HDFK FDVH WKH DGGLWLRQDO HOHFWURQ LV DFFRPPRGDWHG LQ WKH DQWLERQGLQJ HJ VHW PD\ EH LQ WKH UDQJH RI FDO PROf .f DQG $6Dr &RQFOXVLRQV 7KH UHVXOWV RI WKH FDOFXODWLRQV SUHVHQWHG KHUH GHPRQVWUDWH WKH LPSRUWDQFH RI LQWUDPROHFXODU HQWURS\ FKDQJHV WKDW RFFXU RQ HOHFWURQ DWWDFKPHQW WR FRRUGLQDWLRQ FRPSOH[HV )RU VROXWLRQSKDVH UHGR[ FRXSOHV LQWUDPROHFXODU HQWURS\ FKDQJHV DUH JHQHUDOO\ VPDOOHU WKDQ WKH HQWURS\ FKDQJH RFFXUULQJ LQ WKH VXUURXQGLQJ VROYHQW +RZHYHU LQ VSHFLDO FDVHV r,W LV QRW SURILWDEOH WR DWWHPSW VLPLODU FDOFXODWLRQV GLUHFWO\ IRU 0DFDFf DQG 0DFDFff FRPSOH[HV 7KHUH LV FRQVLGHUDEOH GLVDJUHHPHQW LQ WKH OLWHUDWXUH FRQFHUQLQJ WKH LQWHUSUHWDWLRQ RI WKH UDWKHU FRPSOH[ LQIUDUHG DQG 5DPDQ VSHFWUD IRU 0DFDFf FRPSOH[HV
PAGE 89
VXFK DV WKH &R,,,f,,f FRXSOHV FRQVLGHUHG KHUH LQWUDPROHFXODU HQWURS\ FKDQJHV PD\ FRQWULEXWH VLJQLILFDQWO\ WR WKH WRWDO HQWURS\ FKDQJH IRU WKH UHGR[ FRXSOH HYHQ IRU LRQV RI TXLWH VPDOO UDGLL ,Q WKH FDVH RI UHGR[ FRXSOHV LQYROYLQJ ODUJH LRQV VXFK DV &R ELS\ fnI GLIIHUHQWLDO VROYDWLRQ HIIHFWV DUH H[SHFWHG WR EH UHODWLYHO\ VPDOO DQG $6SFr FDQ SUREDEO\ EH DWWULEXWHG DOPRVW HQWLUHO\ WR DQ LQWUDPROHFXODU HQWURS\ FKDQJH )RU H[DPSOH $6UFr IRU >)HELS\f@ DQG >&RELS\f@ DUH FDO PROf .f DQG FDO PROf .f LQ ZDWHU UHVSHFWLYHO\ $OWKRXJK H[WHQVLYH FDOFXODWLRQV RI WKH YLEUDWLRQDO SDUWLWLRQ IXQFWLRQV FDQQRW EH FDUULHG RXW IRU WKHVH LRQV GXH WR WKH ODFN RI VSHFWURVFRSLF GDWD WKH f FDO PROf .f GLIIHUHQFH LQ WKH $6UFr YDOXHV LV XQGHUVWDQGDEOH LQ YLHZ RI WKH FKDQJHV LQ 01 VWUHWFKLQJ DQG SUHVXPDEO\ EHQGLQJ IUHTXHQFLHVf WKDW RFFXU IRU WKHVH WZR FRXSOHV (VVHQWLDOO\ QR FKDQJH LQ 01 YLEUDWLRQDO IUHTXHQFLHV RFFXUV IRU >)HELS\f@ ZKLOH WKH IUHTXHQF\ FKDQJH IRU >&RELS\f@ FRXSOH DPRXQWV WR DQ DYHUDJH RI f FPf 7KH LQVLJKW JDLQHG IURP WKH FDOFXODWLRQV IRU LQWUDPROHFXODU HQWURS\ FKDQJHV KDV HQDEOHG URXJK HVWLPDWHV WR EH PDGH IRU WKH HQWURS\ FKDQJHV WKDW RFFXU IRU JDVSKDVH HOHFWURQ DWWDFKPHQW WR WKH WUDQVLWLRQ PHWDO %GLNHWRQDWH FRPSOH[HV LQYHVWLJDWHG LQ WKLV VWXG\
PAGE 90
&+$37(5 0(7$//,*$1' %21' (1(5*,(6 $1' 62/9$7,21 (1(5*,(6 )25 *$63+$6( 75$16,7,21 0(7$/ 75,6$&(7$&(721$7( &203/(;(6 $1' 7+(,5 $1,216 ,QWURGXFWLRQ 7KHUH KDYH EHHQ VHYHUDO DWWHPSWV WR GHWHUPLQH WKH DYHUDJH KRPRO\WLF DQG KHWHURO\WLF 02 ERQG HQHUJLHV LQ 0DFDFf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r SUHYLRXVO\ UHSRUWHG D QHZ HVWLPDWH FDQ EH PDGH RI WKLV ERQG HQHUJ\ )URP WKH RULJLQDO UHDFWLRQ FDORULPHWU\ GDWD EHWWHU HVWLPDWHV FDQ WKHQ EH PDGH IRU WKH DYHUDJH 02 KRPRO\WLF DQG KHWHURO\WLF ERQG HQHUJLHV IRU 0DFDFf FRPSOH[HV 7KLV GDWD FRPELQHG ZLWK WKH JDVSKDVH HOHFWURQ DWWDFKPHQW GDWD IRU WKH 0DFDFf FRPSOH[HV DQG WKH IUHH JDVSKDVH LRQ OHDGV WR WKH DYHUDJH KHWHURO\WLF ERQG HQHUJLHV LQ WKH FRUUHVSRQGLQJ 0DFDFfn LRQV 6HYHUDO RI WKH 0DFDFf FRPSOH[HV IRU ZKLFK HOHFWURQ DWWDFKPHQW GDWD ZHUH REWDLQHG DOVR H[KLELW UHYHUVLEOH HOHFWURFKHPLFDO EHKDYLRU IRU RQH HOHFWURQ UHGXFWLRQ )URP ( GDWD HVWLPDWHV FDQ EH PDGH RI VLQJOH b HOHFWURGH SRWHQWLDOV &RPSDULVRQ ZLWK WKH JDVSKDVH GDWD OHDGV WR WKH FKDQJH LQ VROYDWLRQ HQHUJ\ IRU 0DFDFf FRXSOHV 5HOLDEOH GDWD IRU VROYDWLRQ HQHUJLHV RI FRPSOH[ PHWDO LRQV DUH YHU\ VFDUFH \HW DUH
PAGE 91
HVVHQWLDO IRU D FRPSOHWH XQGHUVWDQGLQJ RI WKH WKHUPRG\QDPLFV RI UHGR[ SURFHVVHV DW FRRUGLQDWHG PHWDO FHQWHUV &RQVLGHUDWLRQ RI WKH UHODWLYH FRQWULEXWLRQV RI WKH FKDQJHV LQ VROYDWLRQ HQHUJLHV DQG ERQG HQHUJLHV WKDW RFFXU IRU HOHFWURQ DWWDFKPHQW WR 0DFDFf FRPSOH[HV SURYLGHV DQ RYHUDOO DSSUHFLDWLRQ RI KRZ LRQL]DWLRQ SRWHQWLDOV RI 0Jf LRQV DUH UHODWHG WR WKH PDJQLWXGH RI D SDUWLFXODU 0DFDFfn UHGR[ FRXSOH (OHFWURQ $WWDFKPHQW (QHUJ\ 5HODWLRQVKLSV 7KH JHQHUDO WKHUPRFKHPLFDO F\FOH LQ )LJXUH LV WKH EDVLV IRU PRVW RI WKH WKHUPRFKHPLFDO UHVXOWV SUHVHQWHG LQ WKLV UHSRUW 7KH F\FOH VKRZV WKH JHQHUDO WKHUPRFKHPLFDO UHODWLRQVKLSV EHWZHHQ WKHUPRG\QDPLF IXQFWLRQV $; IRU 0/ ERQG IRUPDWLRQ RU VROYDWLRQ RI D FRPSOH[ DQG HOHFWURQ DWWDFKPHQW WKHUPRG\QDPLFV $;Drf IRU D PHWDO LRQ LQ HVVHQWLDOO\ WKUHH SK\VLFDOO\ GLIIHUHQW HQYLURQPHQWV UHDFWLRQV D E DQG Ff DW D JLYHQ WHPSHUDWXUH $ F\FOH RI WKLV W\SH DQG FUXGH HVWLPDWHV RI WKH YDULRXV WKHUPRG\QDPLF TXDQWLWLHV ZHUH GLVFXVVHG E\ %XFNLQJKDP DQG 6DUJHVRQ VRPH \HDUV DJR ,Q UHDFWLRQ Df HOHFWURQ DWWDFKPHQW LV WR D PHWDO LRQ 0 ZLWK FKDUJH ] LQ WKH IUHH JDVHRXV VWDWH 0]Jf ,Q Ef HOHFWURQ DWWDFKPHQW LV WR WKH JDVSKDVH FRPSOH[ >0/\@QJf RI FKDUJH Q LQ ZKLFK WKH PHWDO LRQ 0 LV HTXLYDOHQWO\ OLJDWHG E\ DQLRQLF OLJDQGV /f ,Q Ff WKH VROYDWHG PHWDO FRPSOH[ LV UHGXFHG WR >0/\ @QB VROQf )RU WKH 0DFDFf FRPSOH[HV FRQVLGHUHG KHUH / DFDF < ] DQG Q ,Q WKH XSSHU SDUW RI )LJXUH ODEHOOHG WKH GLIIHUHQFH LQ $;Dr IRU WKH HOHFWURQ DWWDFKPHQW UHDFWLRQV Df DQG Ef JLYHQ E\ $;Dr>0]Jf @ DQG $;Dr>0/\QJf @ DUH WKHUPRFKHPLFDOO\ UHODWHG WR WKH r GLIIHUHQFH LQ $[r IRU KHWHURO\WLF FOHDYDJH RI WKH WKH PHWDOOLJDQG ERQGV IRU WKH R[LGL]HG DQG UHGXFHG IRUP RI WKH FRPSOH[ $[KHWr>0/\fQ@ DQG $[KHWr> 0/\fQ !@ r $ VLPLODU F\FOH FDQ EH XVHG WR GHULYH $$;KRPr> 0/\f @ YDOXHV IRU KRPRO\WLF ERQG GLVVRFLDWLRQ
PAGE 92
)LJXUH 7KHUPRFKHPLFDO F\FOH UHODWLQJ WKHUPRG\QDPLF IXQFWLRQV $; IRU HOHFWURQ DWWDFKPHQW SURFHVVHV UHDFWLRQV D E DQG Ff DQG KHWHURO\WLF ERQG HQHUJLHV DQG VROYDWLRQ HQHUJLHV IRU WKH FRPSOH[HV 0/\ DQG 0/\n
PAGE 93
,Q WKH SDUW RI WKH F\FOH ODEHOOHG ,, WKH GLIIHUHQFH LQ $; IRU WKH HOHFWURQ DWWDFKPHQW UHDFWLRQV $;Dr>0/ 0/YQ VROQf @ LV WKHUPRFKHPLFDOO\ UHODWHG WR WKH GLIIHUHQFH EHWZHHQ $;r IRU VROYDWLRQ RI WKH R[LGL]HG DQG UHGXFHG IRUPV RI WKH FRPSOH[ $; $;VROYr>0/0/YQ@ DQG ([SHULPHQWDO UHVXOWV IRU UHDFWLRQ Ef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f DV GLVFXVVHG LQ FKDSWHU 7KH PHWKRG FDQ EH DSSOLHG HTXDOO\ ZHOO WR UHDFWLRQV LQYROYLQJ SRVLWLYH RU QHJDWLYH LRQV EXW VXFK GDWD IRU PHWDO FRPSOH[HV LV VFDUFH 9HUWLFDO LRQL]DWLRQ GDWD DUH PRUH ZLGHO\ DYDLODEOH IRU YRODWLOH PHWDO FRPSOH[HV IURP VWXGLHV RI LRQL]DWLRQ DSSHDUDQFH SRWHQWLDOV DQG SKRWRHOHFWURQ VSHFWURVFRS\ 3(6f 7KH HQHUJ\ GLIIHUHQFH EHWZHHQ WKH DGLDEDWLF DQG YHUWLFDO SURFHVVHV FDQ EH UHODWLYHO\ VPDOO LI WKH JHRPHWU\ RI WKH QHXWUDO LV VLPLODU WR WKDW RI WKH LRQ )RU H[DPSOH WKH DGLDEDWLF LRQL]DWLRQ HQHUJ\ IRU IHUURFHQH KDV UHFHQWO\ EHHQ HVWLPDWHG DV H9 E\ )7,&5 0DXWQHUÂI VXJJHVWV H9 IURP SXOVHG KLJK SUHVVXUH PDVV VSHFWURPHWU\ VWXGLHVf ZKLOH WKH YHUWLFDO ,3 YDOXH REWDLQHG IURP 3(6 LV H9 6LJQLILFDQW GLIIHUHQFHV EHWZHHQ DGLDEDWLF DQG YHUWLFDO HQHUJLHV PD\ DULVH KRZHYHU ZKHQ JHRPHWU\ FKDQJHV XSRQ HOHFWURQ DWWDFKPHQW RU LRQL]DWLRQ DUH VLJQLILFDQW DQG VXFK VXEVWDQWLDO UHDUUDQJHPHQWV DUH FRPPRQ LQ WUDQVLWLRQ PHWDO FRPSOH[ UHGR[ FKHPLVWU\ )RU H[DPSOH WKH DGLDEDWLF LRQL]DWLRQ HQHUJ\ RI PDQJDQRFHQH LV f H9 ZKLOH WKH YHUWLFDO LRQL]DWLRQ HQHUJ\ REWDLQHG IRU WKH KLJKVSLQ VWDWH E\ 3(6 LV
PAGE 94
H9 )RU PHWDO FRPSOH[HV WKHUHIRUH YHUWLFDO LRQL]DWLRQ GDWD FDQ RQO\ EH XVHG LQ WKHUPRFKHPLFDO F\FOHV VXFK DV )LJXUH IRU WKRVH FDVHV ZKHUH LW LV NQRZQ RU FDQ EH UHDVRQDEO\ DVVXPHG WKDW WKH JHRPHWULHV RI WKH QHXWUDO DQG WKH LRQ DUH QRW WRR GLVVLPLODU ,W VKRXOG EH QRWHG WKDW HYHQ LI WKH WUDQVLWLRQ HQHUJ\ WKH DGLDEDWLF HQHUJ\f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f FRPSOH[HV ZLWK RWKHU WKHUPRFKHPLFDO GDWD LW LV XVHIXO WR NQRZ WKH WHPSHUDWXUH GHSHQGHQFH RI .HT HT f VLQFH VXFK GDWD OHDGV WR YDOXHV RI $6Dr DQG $K r (VWLPDWHV RI $* r DW D D RWKHU WHPSHUDWXUHV FDQ WKHQ EH PDGH )URP WKH FRQFOXVLRQV GUDZQ IURP FKDSWHU FRQFHUQLQJ WKH PDJQLWXGHV RI $6 IRU JDVSKDVH FRRUGLQDWLRQ FRPSRXQGV D PD[LPXP YDOXH RI $6 r FDO PROn .n IRU WKH UHDFWLRQ &RDFDFfJf H &RDFDFffJf LV DVVXPHG 7KH YDOXH IRU $+Dr DW LV NFDO PROn KLJKHU WKDQ $* DW DVVXPLQJ $+ LQGHSHQGHQW RI WHPSHUDWXUHf )RU WKH RWKHU 0DFDFfn FRXSOHV ZKHUH OHVV FKDQJH LQ YLEUDWLRQDO DQG HOHFWURQLF HQWURSLHV RFFXU $6 VKRXOG G EH VPDOOHU DQG VLPLODU WR WKH YDOXHV UHSRUWHG IRU RUJDQLF FRPSRXQGV 9DOXHV IRU WKH WRWDO PHWDOOLJDQG KHWHURO\WLF ERQG GLVVRFLDWLRQ HQWKDOSLHV IRU 0DFDFf FRPSOH[HV $+KHWr>0DFDFf@f RI WKH ILUVW WUDQVLWLRQ PHWDO VHULHV DUH IRXQG WR EH f NFDO PROn VHH GLVFXVVLRQ EHORZf 6LQFH YDOXHV RI $*Dr DW DQG $+Dr DW IRU 0DFDFf FRPSOH[HV PD\ GLIIHU E\ VHYHUDO NFDO PRO LQ WKH ZRUVW FDVH WKH SHUFHQWDJH HUURU LQWURGXFHG LQWR GHULYHG YDOXHV RI $+KHWr0DFDFff f
PAGE 95
XVLQJ WKH DSSUR[LPDWLRQ $* .f $+ .f LV VPDOO VLQFH RI $+Dr ERQG HQWKDOSLHV KDYH YDOXHV LQ WKH UDQJH RI f NFDO PROf VHH EHORZf :KHQ TXRWLQJ DQ DYHUDJH HQHUJ\ SHU 02 ERQG $;KHW02f WKH HUURU LQWURGXFHG E\ DVVXPLQJ $* r a $+ LV SUREDEO\ NFDO PROn D D DOO FDVHV $V GLVFXVVHG DERYH WKURXJKRXW WKLV GLVVHUWDWLRQ WKH VWDWLRQDU\ HOHFWURQ FRQYHQWLRQ LV DGRSWHG ZKLFK DVVLJQV D KHDW FDSDFLW\ DQG DQ HQWURS\ RI ]HUR WR WKH IUHH HOHFWURQ 8QGHU WKLV FRQYHQWLRQ WKH YDOXHV IRU PRQRDWRPLF LRQV DW 2 DSSO\ DW DOO WHPSHUDWXUHV VLQFH WKH KHDW FDSDFLWLHV RI 0] DQG 0]ff DUH DOZD\V HTXDO 7KHUHIRUH YDOXHV RI $+Dr 0Jf DUH JLYHQ E\ WKH QHJDWLYH YDOXH RI WKH WKLUG LRQL]DWLRQ SRWHQWLDO IRU WKH PHWDO 7KH VWDWLRQDU\ HOHFWURQ FRQYHQWLRQ LV DGRSWHG WR PDLQWDLQ FRQVLVWHQF\ ZLWK WKH RULJLQDO $*Dr YDOXHV TXRWHG IRU WKH RUJDQLF UHIHUHQFH FRPSRXQGV RQ ZKLFK WKH UHVXOWV SUHVHQWHG LQ WKLV GLVVHUWDWLRQ DUH EDVHG )URP F\FOH ,, RI )LJXUH $*Dr 0DFDFfJf GDWD FDQ EH FRPSDUHG ZLWK $*Dr IRU WKH VDPH SURFHVV LQ VROXWLRQ WR \LHOG WKH GLIIHUHQFH EHWZHHQ WKH VROYDWLRQ IUHH HQHUJLHV RI D 0DFDFf QHXWUDO DQG LWV DQLRQ 9DOXHV RI $*Dr 0DFDFfVROQf FDQ EH HVWLPDWHG IURP HOHFWURFKHPLFDO ( YDOXHV IRU 0DFDFfMAn FRXSOHV VHH GLVFXVVLRQ EHORZf $VVXPLQJ $* r >0DFDFfJf @ GDWD DW LV YDOLG DW RWKHU WHPSHUDWXUHV DJDLQ LQWURGXFHV DQ DSSUR[LPDWLRQ EXW XVLQJ WKH XSSHU OLPLW RI f FDO PROf .n IRU $6Dr WKH HUURU LQWURGXFHG LQ TXRWLQJ YDOXHV RI $$*6R/YrW0DFDFff @ DW LV DJDLQ W\SLFDOO\ NFDO PROf ,Q WKH WKHUPRFKHPLFDO F\FOH XVHG LQ WKLV ZRUN WR REWDLQ YDOXHV IRU WKH ERQG GLVVRFLDWLRQ HQWKDOSLHV IRU 0DFDFf DQG 0DFDFfMf FRPSOH[HV D YDOXH IRU $+ DW IRU DFDF G UDGLFDO LV QHHGHG 7KH YDOXH REWDLQHG IURP WKH JDVSKDVH VWXGLHV LV D IUHH HQHUJ\ EXW $6Dr LV H[SHFWHG WR EH W\SLFDOO\ VPDOO DV REVHUYHG IRU RWKHU RUJDQLF FRPSRXQGV HVSHFLDOO\ VLQFH WKH JHRPHWULHV RI DFDFf DQG DFDFf DUH SUREDEO\ TXLWH VLPLODU
PAGE 96
+RPRO\WLF DQG +HWHUROYWLF 02 %RQG (QWKDOSLHV LQ 0DFDFfATf &RPSOH[HV DQG 0DFDFfTf ,RQV 7KH GLIIHUHQFH LQ WKH WRWDO KHWHURO\WLF RU KRPRO\WLF PHWDOOLJDQG ERQG GLVVRFLDWLRQ HQWKDOSLHV EHWZHHQ DQ\ 0DFDFf FRPSOH[ DQG LWV QHJDWLYH LRQ FDQ EH REWDLQHG IURP WKH UHODWLRQVKLSV LQ HJ $$+KHW>0 fn@ $+ r f rf R $+ rfn KHW >0DFDFf@ $+KHWr>0DFDFf @ >07-Jf@ $+J >0DFDFfMJf@ Df $$+KRPr >0DFDFfr@ K $+KRPr>0DFDFf@ $+KRPr>0 DFDFff @ $+Dr>0Jf@ $+Dr>0DFDFfJf@ Ef 9DOXHV IRU WKH HOHFWURQ DWWDFKPHQW HQHUJLHV UHTXLUHG IRU HT DUH JLYHQ LQ 7DEOH %HIRUH GHULYLQJ WKH DYHUDJH ERQG GLVVRFLDWLRQ HQWKDOSLHV IRU WKH JDVSKDVH 0DFDFfn LRQV E\ XVLQJ HTV Df DQG Ef WKH DYDLODEOH GDWD IRU WKH FRUUHVSRQGLQJ QHXWUDO ERQG HQWKDOSLHV ZDV FULWLFDOO\ DVVHVVHG ,QDFFXUDWH DVVXPSWLRQV PDGH LQ WKH OLWHUDWXUH GHULYDWLRQV UHTXLUHG XV WR JHQHUDWH QHZ H[SHULPHQWDO GDWD DQG WKHUHE\ UHYLVH WKH SXEOLVKHG HQWKDOSLHV DV GLVFXVVHG LQ WKH IROORZLQJ )RU 0DFDFf FRPSOH[HV WKH DYHUDJH KRPRO\WLF PHWDOR[\JHQ ERQG HQWKDOS\ $+KRPr0f FDQ EH IRXQG IURP WKH WKHUPRFKHPLFDO F\FOH LQ )LJXUH 7KH UHODWLRQVKLS EHWZHHQ WKH YDULRXV WKHUPRFKHPLFDO YDOXHV LV JLYHQ LQ HT $+KRQr 02f ^ $+Ir+DFDFOf f $+YDSr+DFDFf $+ KRP +DFDFf $+VXEr0! $+Ir>0DFDFfFf@ $+ r VXE >0DFDFf@ $+Ir>+Jf @ ,Q )LJXUH $+YDSr+DFDFf LV WKH HQWKDOS\ RI YDSRUL]DWLRQ RI DFHW\O DFHWRQH DQG $+VXEr>0DFDFf@ DQG $+VXEr0f DUH HQWKDOSLHV RI VXEOLPDWLRQ RI 0DFDFf DQG WKH PHWDO 0 UHVSHFWLYHO\ 7KH UHODWLRQVKLS
PAGE 97
'+DFDFf $+I+Jf +Jf 0DFDFfJf $+OXEr0DFDFff 0DFDFfFf f $+Ir0DFDFff 0Ff &Ff Jf +Jf )LJXUH 7KHUPRFKHPLFDO F\FOH XVHG WR GHWHUPLQH WKH +f§DFDF HQROfJf $+YDSr+DFDFf $+XEr0f +DFDFOf 0Ff [ $+Ir+DFDFf &Ff Jf +Jf HQWKDOSLHV RI IRUPDWLRQ RI 0DFDFf FRPSOH[HV
PAGE 98
7DEOH )UHH (QHUJLHV RI (OHFWURQ $WWDFKPHQW NFDO PROf WR 0DFDFf FRPSOH[HV DQG (QWKDOSLHV RI (OHFWURQ $WWDFKPHQW WR )UHH 0r Tf LRQV DQD 0Tf 0 $*Dr>0DFDFfJf @D $+Dr>0Jf @E $+Dr>0Jf@F 7L f 9 f &U s f 0Q s )H s LQ f R f &R s f 5X s R f FQ f D$OO YDOXHV WDNHQ IURP 7DEOH WHPSHUDWXUH .f A9DOXHV JLYHQ DUH QHJDWLYH RI WKH WKLUG LRQL]DWLRQ SRWHQWLDOV RI WKH PHWDOV WDNHQ IURP UHI &RQYHUVLRQ IDFWRU .FDO PRO H9 F(OHFWURQ DIILQLW\ GDWD IRU DWRPLF PHWDOV WDNHQ IURP UHI 1XPEHU LQ SDUHQWKHVLV LV WKH XQFHUWDLQW\ LQ WKH ODVW ILJXUHVf
PAGE 99
EHWZHHQ $+KRPr0f DQG WKH DYHUDJH KHWHURO\WLF PHWDO R[\JHQ ERQG HQWKDOS\ $+KHWr0f LV JLYHQ LQ HJ $+KrHW0f ? 0f eL,30f $+DrDFDF ff LL 7KH VXPPDWLRQ WHUP LQ HT LV WKH VXP RI WKH ILUVW WKUHH LRQL]DWLRQ SRWHQWLDOV IRU WKH PHWDO 0 9DOXHV IRU $+Ir IRU 0DFDFf FRPSOH[HV RI WKH ILUVW WUDQVLWLRQ PHWDO VHULHV DUH DYDLODEOH LQ WKH OLWHUDWXUH IURP WKH UHVXOWV RI :RRG DQG -RQHV XVLQJ ERPE FDORULPHWU\ DQG IURP WKH UHVXOWV RI UHDFWLRQ FDORULPHWU\ 5HDFWLRQ FDORULPHWU\ LV FRQVLGHUHG WR EH WKH PRUH UHOLDEOH PHWKRG IRU 0DFDFf FRPSRXQGVn DQG WKLV WHFKQLTXH KDV EHHQ DSSOLHG WR 0DFDFf FRPSOH[HV RI LQWHUHVW KHUH IRU 0 &U 0Q )H DQG &R 5HDFWLRQ FDORULPHWU\ KDV EHHQ XVHG E\ 5LEHLUR 'D 6LOYD DQG FRZRUNHUV WR GHWHUPLQH YDOXHV RI $+Ir DQG $+KRPr0ff IrU RWKHU WULV %GLNHWRQDWH FRPSOH[HV DQG WKH DSSOLFDWLRQ RI WKH WHFKQLTXH WR WUDQVLWLRQ PHWDO -GLNHWRQDWHV KDV EHHQ UHYLHZHG 7KHLU ZRUN LQFOXGHG D UHDSSUDLVDO RI RI WKH YDOXHV RI $+Ir DQG $+KRPr0f GHULYHG IURP WKH RULJLQDO UHDFWLRQ FDORULPHWU\ VWXGLHV DQG WKH YDOXHV KDYH EHHQ UHYLVHG KHUH XVLQJ WKH ODWHVW YDOXHV RI WKH DX[LOLDU\ WKHUPRFKHPLFDO GDWD UHTXLUHG IRU WKHLU GHWHUPLQDWLRQ 7KH WZR YDOXHV WKDW LQWURGXFH WKH JUHDWHVW XQFHUWDLQW\ LQ GHULYHG ERQG HQWKDOSLHV IRU WKH 0DFDFf FRPSOH[HV DUH WKH YDOXHV RI WKH JDV SKDVH KRPRO\WLF ERQG GLVVRFLDWLRQ HQWKDOS\ RI WKH + ERQG LQ WKH HQRO IRUP RI DFHW\ODFHWRQH $+KRPr+DFDFf LQ HT f DQG WKH HQWKDOS\ RI VXEOLPDWLRQ RI WKH 0DFDFf FRPSOH[ 9DOXHV IRU $+VXEr>0DFDFf@ DUH GLIILFXOW WR PHDVXUH SUHFLVHO\ IRU FRPSRXQGV RI UHODWLYHO\ ORZ YRODWLOLW\ VXFK DV 0DFDFf FRPSOH[HV )RU H[DPSOH YDOXHV IRU $+ VXE XVHG IRU &UDFDFf TXRWHG LQ WKH OLWHUDWXUH UDQJH IURP NFDO PRO LQ WKH ERPE FDORULPHWU\ VWXG\ RI :RRG DQG -RQHV WR NFDO PRO REWDLQHG PRUH UHFHQWO\ IURP GLIIHUHQWLDO VFDQQLQJ FDORULPHWU\ 7KH DSSDUHQW XQUHOLDELOLW\ RI WKH YDOXHV RI $+VXEr>0DFDFf@ XVHG LQ WKH
PAGE 100
HDUOLHU ZRUN ZDV UHFRJQLVHG LQ WKH UHDSSUDLVDO E\ 5LELHUR 'D 6LOYD DQG FRZRUNHUVA )URP D UHYLHZ RI WKH UHVXOWV DYDLODEOH LQ WKH WKH YDOXHV RI $+VXEr>0DFDFf@ FKRVHQ E\ WKHVH ZRUNHUV ZHUH LQ WKH UDQJH RI n NFDO PROf 7KH VDPH YDOXHV ZHUH XVHG LQ WKLV UHSRUW DQG DUH JLYHQ LQ 7DEOH DORQJ ZLWK WKH RWKHU DX[LOLDU\ GDWD XVHG LQ )LJXUH 1R H[SHULPHQWDO YDOXHV KDYH EHHQ DYDLODEOH IRU WKH YDOXH RI $+KRPr+fDFDFfI DQG YDOXHV XVHG SUHYLRXVO\ KDYH EHHQ HVWLPDWHG 7KH GLIILFXOW\ RI DVVHVVLQJ WKH FRQWULEXWLRQV WR WKH UHODWLYH VWDELOLW\ RI DFHW\ODFHWRQH GXH WRLQWUDPROHFXODU K\GURJHQ ERQGLQJ LQ WKH HQRO IRUP DQG WKH HIIHFWV RI HOHFWURQLF GHORFDOL]DWLRQ LQ WKH DFHW\ODFHWRQDWH UDGLFDO KDV OHG WR HVWLPDWHG YDOXHV UDQJLQJ IURP NFDO PROfA $ YDOXH RI $+KRPr+DFDFf FDQ EH REWDLQHG IURP WKH JDVSKDVH SURWRQ DIILQLW\ $+S$f RI DFDFnA $+Dr DFDFn DQG WKH LRQL]DWLRQ SRWHQWLDO RI + DWRP 7KH UHODWLRQVKLS LV JLYHQ E\ HJ $+KRIQr+DFDFf $+S$DFDFnf ,3+Jf f $+DrDFDF f 6XEVWLWXWLQJ WKH DYDLODEOH GDWD IURP WKH OLWHUDWXUH DQG $+Jr IRU DFDFr GHWHUPLQHG LQ WKLV UHSRUW 7DEOH f LQWR HT \LHOGV D YDOXH RI $+KRPr+fDFDFf RI NFDO PRO 7KH QHZ YDOXH IRU WKH $+KRPr+DFDFf FRPELQHG ZLWK WKH UHDFWLRQ FDORULPHWU\ GDWD OHDGV WR QHZ YDOXHV RI $+KRPr0f DQG $+KHWr0f IRU WKH 0DFDFf FRPSOH[HV RI &U 0Q )H DQG &R DQG WKHVH YDOXHV DUH JLYHQ LQ 7DEOH $OVR JLYHQ LQ 7DEOH DUH WKH YDOXHV RI $$+KHWr>0DFDFf@ REWDLQHG IURP HT Df DQG WKH GDWD LQ 7DEOH 7KH UHVXOWLQJ $+KHWr0f DQG $+KRPr0f YDOXHV IURP HTV Df DQG Ef IRU WKH 0DFDFf DQLRQV DUH OLVWHG LQ 7DEOH 7KH UHVXOWV IRU WKH DYHUDJH 0 KHWHURO\WLF ERQG HQHUJLHV REWDLQHG LQ WKLV UHSRUW 7DEOH f DUH VKRZQ JUDSKLFDOO\ LQ )LJXUH GLDPRQG SRLQWVf 7KH KHWHURO\WLF ERQG GLVVRFLDWLRQ HQWKDOSLHV IRU WKH 0,,,f
PAGE 101
QHXWUDO FRPSOH[HV DUH DSSUR[LPDWHO\ WZLFH WKH YDOXHV RI WKRVH IRU WKH 0,,f DQLRQV ,QWHUHVWLQJO\ WKLV DSSUR[LPDWH IDFWRU RI LV DOVR IRXQG LQ FRPSDULQJ WKH KHDWV RI K\GUDWLRQ RI 0 DQG 0 LRQVnA DV ZHOO DV WKH PHDQ KHWHURO\WLF ERQG GLVVRFLDWLRQ HQWKDOSLHV RI WKH 0,,,f PHWDOORFHQLXP LRQV DQG 0,,f PHWDOORFHQHV >&S0@ Jf DQG &S0Jf 2Q WKH EDVLV RI WKHVH OLPLWHG FRPSDULVRQV WKH UDWLR RI DYHUDJH KHWHURO\WLF ERQG HQHUJLHV IRU WKHVH W\SHV RI 0,,,f DQG 0,,f FRPSOH[HV VHHPV WR EH DVVRFLDWHG PRUH ZLWK WKH IRUPDO R[LGDWLRQ VWDWHV RI WKH PHWDO WKDQ ZLWK WKH FKDUJHV RQ WKH FRPSOH[HV RU WKH QDWXUHV RI WKH OLJDQGV 7KH UHVXOWV LQ 7DEOH LQGLFDWH WKDW WKH PHDQ KRPRO\WLF ERQG GLVVRFLDWLRQ HQWKDOSLHV IRU WKH PHWDO,,f DQLRQV DUH LQ DOO FDVHV KLJKHU WKDQ WKH YDOXHV IRU WKH PHWDO,,,f FRPSOH[HV 7KHUPRFKHPLFDOO\ WKLV UHVXOW FDQ EH WUDFHG WR WKH KLJKHU HOHFWURQ DIILQLWLHV RI WKH QHXWUDO FRPSOH[HV FRPSDUHG WR WKH IUHH PHWDO DWRPV 7DEOH f 7KH WUHQGV LQ KRPRO\WLF ERQG HQHUJLHV IRU PHWDO FRPSOH[HV ZLOO JHQHUDOO\ EH OHVV LQWXLWLYH WKDQ IRXQG IRU RUJDQLF FRPSRXQGV EHFDXVH VLJQLILFDQW HOHFWURQLF UHDUUDQJHPHQWV FDQ RFFXU XSRQ ERQG IRUPDWLRQ LQ WKH PHWDO FRPSOH[HV $V H[SHFWHG KHWHURO\WLF HQHUJLHV IROORZ D IDU PRUH SUHGLFWDEOH WUHQG ZKHQ WKH PHWDO R[LGDWLRQ VWDWH LV YDULHG $OWKRXJK LW PD\ EH FRQVLGHUHG WKDW WKH UHVXOWV LQ 7DEOH IRU WKH 0 ERQG GLVVRFLDWLRQ HQWKDOSLHV RI WKH QHXWUDO 0DFDFf FRPSOH[HV DUH PRUH UHOLDEOH DOVR VKRZQ LQ )LJXUH DUH WKH UHVXOWV IRU WKH FRPSOH[HV WDNHQ GLUHFWO\ IURP WKH SXEOLVKHG ERPE FDORULPHWU\ VWXG\ XSSHU SORW FLUFOH SRLQWVf ZKLFK LQFOXGHG DQ HVWLPDWHG YDOXH IRU 7LDFDFf 7KH FRUUHVSRQGLQJ YDOXHV IRU WKH 0DFDFfn DQLRQV GHULYHG IURP WKHP DUH DOVR VKRZQ ORZHU SORW FLUFOH SRLQWVf 7KH QHZ YDOXHV RI $+KHWr0f WULDQJOHV )LJXUH f DUH ORZHU WKDQ WKRVH GHULYHG IURP ERPE FDORULPHWU\ UHVXOWV EHFDXVH RI WKH ORZHU YDOXH XVHG IRU $+KRPr+DFDFf DQG D PRUH KLJKO\ H[RWKHUPLF YDOXH IRU $+DrDFDFff D YDOXH RI NFDO PRO ZDV XVHG SUHYLRXVO\f 7KH FDOFXODWHG YDOXHV XVLQJ WKH ERPE FDORULPHWU\ UHVXOWV SURYLGH DQ LOOXVWUDWLRQ RI WKH
PAGE 102
1HXWUDO 0DFDFf FRPSOH[HV )LJXUH $YHUDJH KHWHURO\WLF 0 ERQG HQHUJLHV IRU 0DFDFf FRPSOH[HV DQG 0DFDFff LRQV 8SSHU SORW FLUFOHVf DUH UHVXOWV IURP DQ HDUO\ UHSRUW XVLQJ ERPE FDORULPHWU\ 8SSHU SORW GLDPRQGVf IURP WKLV ZRUN 7KH ORZHU SORW VKRZV WKH FRUUHVSRQGLQJ YDOXHV IRU 0DFDFfn LRQV 7KH WUHQGV IURP HDFK VWXG\ IROORZ WKH FODVVLFDO GRXEOH SHULRGLF YDULDWLRQ ZLWK UHODWLYH PLQLPD RFFXULQJ IRU Gr DQG G PHWDO LRQV 6F DQG )H XSSHU 0Q ORZHUf
PAGE 103
7DEOH $X[LOLDU\ WKHUPRFKHPLFDO GDWD NFDO PROnf IRU 0DFDFf FRPSOH[HV DQG DFHWYODFHWRQH &U 0Q )H &R $+6XEr W0 DFDFf @ s D s D s D s E $+VXEr0! s & s & s & s & $+IrFRPSOH[f s D s D s D s E $+KRP+DFDF! $*Dr DFDFrf $+YDSr+DFDF! $+Ir+DFDF f $+Ir+IJf s G s G s H s I s F D7DNHQ IURP UHI E7DNHQ IURP UHI F7DNHQ IURP UHI G)URP WKLV ZRUN VHH WH[W H7DNHQ IURP UHI I7DNHQ IURP UHI
PAGE 104
7DEOH $YHUDJH PHWDOR[YTHQ ERQG HQHUJ\ GDWD NFDO PRO IRU JDVSKDVH 0DFDFf FRPSOH[HV DQG 0LDFDF8n DQLRQV 0 $$+KHWR D >0DFDFf n @D $+KRPr0rf 0DFDFf $+KHW0rf $+KHWr0f Â+A02f 0DFDFf 0DFDFf 0DFDFf 9 f§ f§ r &U E s & s G 0Q s E s & s )H E s & s G &R E s & s s G 5X D9DOXH REWDLQHG IURP HT DQG JDVSKDVH HOHFWURQ DWWDFKPHQW GDWD JLYHQ LQ 7DEOH GDOXH REWDLQHG IURP UHDFWLRQ FDORULPHWU\ GDWD LQ UHIV DQG FRUUHFWHG IRU YDOXH RI $+KRPr+DFDFfJff VHH WH[Wf F9DOXH REWDLQHG XVLQJ $+Dr RI DFDFr IURP WKLV ZRUN GHWHUPLQHG IURP YDOXH RI $+KRP02f XVLQJ HT Ef
PAGE 105
IRUPDWLRQ RI D SDUW RI WKH FODVVLF GRXEOH SHULRGLF YDULDWLRQ 7KLV WUHQG LV JHQHUDOO\ REVHUYHG IRU KHWHURO\WLF ERQG HQHUJLHV IRU 0 DQG 0 FRPSOH[ LRQV RI WKH ILUVW WUDQVLWLRQ PHWDO VHULHV 7KH UHODWLYH PLQLPD DW 6F DQG )H IRU WKH QHXWUDO FRPSOH[HV MRLQHG E\ D GDVKHG OLQH FRUUHVSRQG WR WKH Gr DQG G FRQILJXUDWLRQV IRU ZKLFK WKH FU\VWDO ILHOG VWDELOL]DWLRQ HQHUJ\ LV ]HURn $Q DQDORJRXV UDWLRQDOH DSSOLHV WR WKH WUHQG REVHUYHG IRU WKH 0DFDFf DQLRQV ZKHUH WKH G FRQILJXUDWLRQ IRU 0DFDFf DQLRQV RFFXUV IRU 0Q DQG D PLQLPXP YDOXH LV DJDLQ REVHUYHG 5HODWLYH 6ROYDWLRQ (QHUJLHV RI 0DFDFfATf DQG 0LDFDFf Tf 7KH GLIIHUHQFH LQ $*VRO\r YDOXHV EHWZHHQ D 0DFDFf FRPSOH[ DQG LWV DQLRQ $$*VRW\r>0DFDFf @ fr LV GHILQHG E\ HT DQG DSSOLHV WR WKH UHDFWLRQ LQ HT $$*VROYr>0DFDFfnf $*VROYr>0DFDFf@ $*VROYr>0DFDFf@ 0DFDFfVROQf 0DFDFfnJf 0DFDFfJf 0 DFDFf VROQf 7KHUPRG\QDPLF GDWD IRU UHYHUVLEOH HOHFWURQ DWWDFKPHQW WR HOHFWURDFWLYH VSHFLHV LQ VROXWLRQ DUH QRUPDOO\ JLYHQ DV VWDQGDUG HOHFWURGH SRWHQWLDOV (r YDOXHVf PHDVXUHG UHODWLYH WR WKH VWDQGDUG K\GURJHQ HOHFWURGH 6+(f )RU PDQ\ VSHFLHV WKLV GDWD FDQ EH FRQYHQLHQWO\ HVWLPDWHG IURP ( YDOXHV PHDVXUHG DJDLQVW D UHIHUHQFH HOHFWURGH E\ XVLQJ IRU H[DPSOH SRODURJUDSK\ RU F\FOLF YROWDPPHWU\ ,Q RUGHU WR EH DEOH WR GLUHFWO\ FRPSDUH (A GDWD REWDLQHG IRU 0LDFDFfA FRXSOHV WR WKH FRUUHVSRQGLQJ r7KH WHUP $$*VRAYr >0DFDFff@ LV LQWHQGHG WR UHSUHVHQW WKH IUHH HQHUJ\ FKDQJH RFFXULQT LQ WKH UHGR[ FRXSOH 0DFDFfn DQG QRW WKH TXDQWLW\ $*VROY>0DFDFf7f@ $*VROYr>0DFDFff @ ZKLFK QDV WKH RSSRVLWH VLJQ
PAGE 106
JDVSKDVH $*Dr YDOXHV WKH ]HUR RI SRWHQWLDO IRU WKH IUHH HOHFWURQ LQ UHDFWLRQV E DQG F RI )LJXUH PXVW EH VHW WR WKH VDPH UHIHUHQFH VWDWH $GRSWLQJ WKH VWDWLRQDU\ HOHFWURQ FRQYHQWLRQ DV GRQH IRU JDVSKDVH $*Dr YDOXHV GHILQLQJ DEVROXWH PDJQLWXGHV RI HOHFWURQ DWWDFKPHQW HQHUJLHV LQ VROXWLRQ UHTXLUHV WKDW WKH SRWHQWLDO RI WKH UHIHUHQFH HOHFWURGH EH UHGHILQHG RQ WKLV DEVROXWH VFDOH WR \LHOG DQ (DEVrUHIf YDOXHf 7KH DEVROXWH HOHFWURQ DWWDFKPHQW HQHUJ\ IRU 0DFDFf FRPSOH[HV LQ VROXWLRQ $*Dr>0DFDFfVROQf @ LV WKHQ HVWLPDWHG E\ HT ZKHUH ) LV WKH )DUDGD\ FRQVWDQW $*Dr>0DFDFffVROQf@ ) ^(>0DFDFf @ (DEVrUHIf` :LWK D YDOXH IRU $*Jr>0DFDFff VROQf @ D YDOXH IRU $$*VROYr>0DFDFff@ FDQ EH REWDLQHG IURP HT DV LOOXVWUDWHG E\ F\FOH ,, LQ )LJXUH $$*VRWYr>0DFDF!nf $*Dr>0DFDFff VROQf @ $*Dr>0DFDFff Jf @ 7KH DEVROXWH YDOXH RI WKH HOHFWURFKHPLFDO SRWHQWLDO RI D JDOYDQLF KDOIFHOO LV WKHUPRG\QDPLFDOO\ UHODWHG WR VLQJOH LRQ VROYDWLRQ HQHUJLHV $OWKRXJK UHODWLYH VLQJOH LRQ VROYDWLRQ HQHUJLHV DUH UHDGLO\ REWDLQDEOH IURP %RUQ F\FOHV DQG HPI PHDVXUHPHQWV WKH DEVROXWH FRQWULEXWLRQ IURP HDFK LRQ WR WKH VROYDWLRQ HQHUJ\ RI s LRQ SDLUV LV GLIILFXOW WR HYDOXDWH 7KHUH KDYH EHHQ DWWHPSWV WR HVWLPDWH WKH DEVROXWH YDOXH RI WKH HQWKDOS\ DQG IUHH HQHUJ\ RI K\GUDWLRQ RI WKH SURWRQ $ YDULHW\ RI GLIIHUHQW PHWKRGV KDYH EHHQ XVHG ZKLFK KDYH EHHQ FDWHJRUL]HG LQWR WKUHH JURXSV E\ +DOLZHOO DQG 1\EXUJ DQG WKH YDULRXV PHWKRGV WKDW KDYH OHG WR OLWHUDWXUH YDOXHV IRU WKH WKHUPRG\QDPLFV RI + VROYDWLRQ KDYH EHHQ FULWLFDOO\ UHYLHZHG E\ &RQZD\ $ UHFHQW YDOXH IRU WKH IUHH HQHUJ\ RI K\GUDWLRQ RI WKH SURWRQ RI s NFDO PROf KDV EHHQ SURYLGHG E\ )DUUHOO DQG 0F7LJXH EDVHG RQ PHDVXUHPHQWV RI YROWD SRWHQWLDO GLIIHUHQFHV 7KLV PHWKRG KDV WKH DGYDQWDJH WKDW LW
PAGE 107
SURYLGHV WKH PRVW GLUHFW PHWKRG IRU WKH GHWHUPLQDWLRQ RI UHDOf IUHH HQHUJLHV RI VROYDWLRQ RI LRQV DQG LQWULQVLFDOO\ LQFOXGHV WKH ZRUN UHTXLUHG WR SDVV D FKDUJH DFURVV WKH VXUIDFH SRWHQWLDO $[f WKDW H[LVWV DW WKH VXUIDFH RI OLTXLGV 7KLV ZRUN LV QRW LQFOXGHG LQ WKH YDOXHV RI DSSURDFKHVn $+VROYr RU $*VROYr REWDLQHG E\ DSSO\LQJ SK\VLFDO PRGHO DQG VXFK YDOXHV DUH WHUPHG FKHPLFDO IUHH HQHUJLHV RI K\GUDWLRQ $ GUDZEDFN RI WKH YROWD SRWHQWLDO PHWKRG LV WKDW WKH UHIHUHQFH VWDWH RI WKH HOHFWURQ LV VWDWLRQDU\ DW D SRLQW LQ D YDFXXP FORVH WR WKH VXUIDFH RI WKH VROXWLRQ XQGHU WKH LQIOXHQFH RI WKH YROWD SRWHQWLDO RI WKH VROXWLRQ 0DFDFffVROQf@ DQG DDJVRYr>P f@
PAGE 108
7DEOH 3RODURTUDSKLF 'DWD DQG 6ROYDWLRQ )UHH (QHUJLHV RI 0DFDF FRPSOH[HV LQ YDULRXV VROYHQWV 0DFDFf &RXSOH $*Dr>0 DFDFf VROQf @ $$*VROYr>0DFDFff@E $FHWRQLWULOH &U 2 U+ &2 f U+ 5X L R f R 4B )H F &R H 0Q I 'LPHWK\OVXOIR[LGH 9 &0 f LQ Ur L 'LFKORURPHWKDQH 5X G :DWHU 5X K nf D9DOXHV JLYHQ LQ YROWV PHDVXUHG XVLQJ 0 7($3 DV VXSSRUWLQJ HOHFWURO\WH DJDLQVW 6&( H[FHSW G Q%X1%) 9V $J$J&O DQG K VHH UHI A9DOXHV JLYHQ LQ NFDO PRO REWDLQHG IURP HTV DQG F7DNHQ IURP UHI G7DNHQ IURP UHI H7DNHQ IURP UHI I7DNHQ IURP UHI V7DNHQ IURP UHI K7DNHQ IURP UHI @9DOXH RI VLQJOH LRQ VROYDWLRQ IUHH HQHUJ\ LQ ZDWHU
PAGE 109
3RODURJUDSKLF GDWD DUH JLYHQ LQ 7DEOH IRU WKH UHYHUVLEOH HOHFWURFKHPLFDO UHGXFWLRQ RI VHYHUDO 0DFDFf FRPSOH[HV LQ DFHWRQLWULOH FLWHG IURP YDULRXV OLWHUDWXUH VRXUFHV 7R IDFLOLWDWH FRPSDULVRQ GDWD DUH TXRWHG ZKHUHYHU SRVVLEOH IURP UHVXOWV REWDLQHG XQGHU FRPPRQ HOHFWURFKHPLFDO FRQGLWLRQV DFHWRQLWULOH ZLWK 0 WHWUDHWK\ODPPRQLXP SHUFKORUDWH DV VXSSRUWLQJ HOHFWURO\WHf )RU 9DFDFf KRZHYHU ( GDWD LV RQO\ DYDLODEOH IRU '062 DV WKH VROYHQW 7R DOORZ D FRPSDULVRQ RI VROYDWLRQ IUHH HQHUJLHV LQ GLIIHUHQW VROYHQWV GDWD IRU WKH UHGXFWLRQ RI 5XDFDFf LQ GLFKORURPHWKDQH DQG ZDWHU DUH LQFOXGHG 7KH ( GDWD OHDG WR YDOXHV RI $*Jr> 0DFDFff VROQf @ DQG $$*VRAYr>0DFDFf @ ZKLFK DUH b DOVR LQFOXGHG LQ 7DEOH 7KH DFFXUDFLHV RI WKHVH YDOXHV DUH GLIILFXOW WR DVVHVV VLQFH WKH\ UHO\ RQ WKH YDOXH FKRVHQ IRU WKH VLQJOH LRQ VROYDWLRQ HQHUJ\ RI WKH SURWRQ DQG WKH DSSUR[LPDWLRQ RI ( WR WUXH (r YDOXHV 8QIRUWXQDWHO\ GXH WR WKH ORZ VROXELOLW\ RI 0DFDFf FRPSOH[HV LQ ZDWHU WKH ODWWHU DSSUR[LPDWLRQ LV PDGH ZRUVH IRU WKH PDMRULW\ RI WKH GDWD LQ 7DEOH VLQFH WKH ( YDOXHV TXRWHG DUH PHDVXUHG LQ QRQDTXHRXV VROYHQWV DJDLQVW DQ DTXHRXV UHIHUHQFH HOHFWURGH &RQVHTXHQWO\ DQ\ MXQFWLRQ SRWHQWLDO WKDW H[LVWV DW WKH VROYHQWUHIHUHQFH HOHFWURGH LQWHUIDFH ZLOO EH LQFOXGHG LQ WKH REVHUYHG ( YDOXHV 7KLV SUREOHP ZDV PLQLPL]HG E\ 6KDOHY DQG (YDQV LQ REWDLQLQJ $$*VROYr YDOXHV IRU RUJDQLF FRPSRXQGV E\ LQFOXGLQJ D FREDOWRFHQLXPFREDOWRFHQH LQWHUQDO VWDQGDUG 7KH DEVROXWH VWDQGDUG SRWHQWLDO RI WKLV &S&R FRXSOH ZDV DVVXPHG WR EH ODUJHO\ VROYHQW LQGHSHQGHQW DV LV DVVXPHG IRU WKH &S)H FRXSOH EXW WKLV DVVXPSWLRQ LV NQRZQ WR EH VRPHZKDW XQVDWLVIDFWRU\ EHFDXVH RI GLIIHUHQW VROYHQW RUGHULQJ HIIHFWV IRU YDULRXV SRODU VROYHQWVA 7KH YDOXH RI $$*VROYr>5XDFDFf@ REWDLQHG LQ ZDWHU KRZHYHU PD\ EH FRQVLGHUHG WR EH D UHDVRQDEOH HVWLPDWH VLQFH MXQFWLRQ SRWHQWLDOV DUH PLQLPL]HG DQG ( ZLOO FORVHO\ DSSUR[LPDWH (r )LJXUH VKRZV D SORW RI JDVSKDVH $*Jr>0 DFDF f Jf @ YDOXHV YHUVXV $*Jr>0DFDFfVROQf@ YDOXHV LQ DFHWRQLWULOH IRU WKH 0DFDFf FRPSOH[HV IRU ZKLFK GDWD DUH DYDLODEOH 7DEOHV DQG f 7KH YDOXH
PAGE 110
)LJXUH 3ORW RI HOHFWURQ DWWDFKPHQW HQHUJLHV IRU 0DFDFf FRPSOH[HV LQ WKH JDVSKDVH YHUVXV WKH HVWLPDWHG YDOXHV LQ DFHWRQLWULOH 7KH HOHFWURQ DWWDFKPHQW HQHUJ\ IRU 9DFDFf LQ WKH JDVSKDVH YHUVXV LQ '062 LV DOVR VKRZQ
PAGE 111
FDO PRO L 6ROXWLRQ SKDVH 7 7 7 7 )LJXUH 3ORW VKRZLQJ SHULRGLF WUHQGV RI HOHFWURQ DWWDFKPHQW HQHUJLHV LQ WKH JDVSKDVH DQG LQ VROXWLRQ 6ROXWLRQSKDVH GDWD DFHWRQLWULOH FLUFOHVf DQG '062 VWDUf
PAGE 112
IRU 9DFDFf LV DOVR VKRZQ VLQFH ( YDOXHV IRU 0DFDFf FRPSOH[HV LQ '062 DUH W\SLFDOO\ VLPLODU WR WKRVH LQ DFHWRQLWULOH JHQHUDOO\ EHLQJ VRPH P9 RU VR PRUH SRVLWLYH $V FDQ EH VHHQ WKHUH LV D VWURQJ OLQHDU FRUUHODWLRQ EHWZHHQ WKH WZR GDWD VHWV 7KH VORSH RI WKH EHVW ILW OLQH LV FORVH WR XQLW\ f LQGLFDWLQJ WKDW GLIIHUHQWLDO VROYDWLRQ HQHUJLHV IRU 0DFDFfrf FRXSOHV DUH HVVHQWLDOO\ FRQVWDQW 7DEOH f ,W VKRXOG EH QRWHG WKDW WKLV FRQFOXVLRQ LV LQGHSHQGHQW RI WKH FKRLFH RI WKH DEVROXWH HOHFWURGH SRWHQWLDO 7KH VDPH GDWD LV SUHVHQWHG LQ )LJXUH DV D SHULRGLF WUHQG WR LOOXVWUDWH WKH UHODWLYH PDJQLWXGHV RI HOHFWURQ DWWDFKPHQW HQHUJLHV LQ WKH JDVSKDVH DQG LQ VROXWLRQ ,W LV LQWHUHVWLQJ WR FRPSDUH WKH H[SHULPHQWDO YDOXHV RI $$*VROYr>0DFDFfn@ LQ 7DEOH WR WKH YDOXHV SUHGLFWHG IURP GLHOHFWULF FRQWLQXXP WKHRU\ 7KH %RUQ HTXDWLRQ $* SUHGLFWV WKH FKDQJH LQ HOHFWURVWDWLF IUHH HQHUJ\ $*HOr ZKHQ D FKDUJH LV WUDQVIHUUHG IURP D FRQGXFWLQJ VSKHUH RI HIIHFWLYH WKHUPRFKHPLFDOf UDGLXV UHII LQ D YDFXXP WR D VSKHUH RI HTXDO UDGLXV LQ D PHGLXP RI GLHOHFWULF FRQVWDQW $ FRQYHQLHQW IRUP RI WKH HTXDWLRQ IRU LRQV LQ VROXWLRQ LV JLYHQ LQ HT $*HOr ]UHIIf 'f NFDO PROn ,Q HT ] LV WKH LQWHJUDO XQLWV RI HOHFWURQLF FKDUJH DQG LV WKH GLHOHFWULF FRQVWDQW RI WKH VROYHQW ,W FDQ EH VHHQ IURP WKH DERYH GHILQLWLRQ WKDW WKH %RUQ HTXDWLRQ DSSOLHV WR WKH SURFHVV LQ HT DQG WKHUHIRUH $* r FDQ EH UHODWHG GLUHFWO\ WR $$J r 7KH %RUQ HTXDWLRQ O 6 9 LQFOXGHV FKHPLFDOf VLQJOH LRQ IUHH HQHUJLHV RI VROYDWLRQ VLQFH WKH ZRUN RI WUDQVIHUULQJ DQ LRQ DFURVV WKH VXUIDFH RI WKH VROYHQW LV QRW FRQVLGHUHG 7KH DGGLWLRQDO ZRUN LV SUREDEO\ VPDOO KRZHYHU ZKHQ FRPSDUHG ZLWK W\SLFDO YDOXHV RI $$*VROYr DQG VR XVHIXO FRPSDULVRQV PD\ VWLOO EH PDGH WR WKH $$*VROYr>0DFDFfn@ REWDLQHG LQ WKLV ZRUN 8VLQJ WKH YDOXH RI $$*VRO\r>5XDFDFf @ RI NFDO PROn LQ ZDWHU WKH %RUQ HTXDWLRQ JLYHV D YDOXH RI UHII RI ƒ ZKLOH WKH
PAGE 113
PD[LPXP UDGLXV IRU 5XDFDFff LV H[SHFWHG WR EH a ƒ WKH PD[LPXP UDGLXV RI 5XDFDFf 7KH VPDOOHU %RUQ WKHUPRFKHPLFDO UDGLXV FRPSDUHG WR WKH FU\VWDOORJUDSKLF UDGLXV LV QRW XQH[SHFWHG VLQFH WKH PROHFXODU VKDSHV DQG FKDUJH GLVWULEXWLRQV LQ WKH 0DFDFf FRXSOH DUH SRRUO\ DSSUR[LPDWHG E\ QHXWUDO DQG FKDUJHG VSKHUHV 7KH WULV FKHODWH FRRUGLQDWLRQ HQYLURQPHQW FDQ DOORZ WKH ILUVW VROYDWLRQ OD\HU WR SHQHWUDWH WKH n ƒ VSKHUH EDVHG RQ WKH GLVWDQFH EHWZHHQ PHWDO FHQWHU DQG PHWK\O K\GURJHQV 7KH UHODWLYH H[WHQWV WR ZKLFK VROYHQW SHQHWUDWLRQ DQG VSHFLILF VROYDWLRQ RI WKH SRODU PHWDOOLJDQG LQWHUDFWLRQV LQIOXHQFH WKH VROYDWLRQ HQHUJLHV FDQQRW EH GHGXFHG IURP WKH SUHVHQW UHVXOWV ,W LV QRWDEOH WKDW WKH GHGXFHG $$*VROYr>5XDFDFf @ YDOXHV IRU GLFKORURPHWKDQH DQG DFHWRQLWULOH VROYHQWV DUH NFDO PRO ORZHU WKDQ WKH YDOXH IRU ZDWHU *LYHQ WKH DSSUR[LPDWLRQV LQKHUHQW LQ WKH PHWKRG XVHG KRZHYHU WKLV PDJQLWXGH RI GLIIHUHQFH FRXOG DULVH IURP HLWKHU DFWXDO YDULDWLRQV LQ VROYDWLRQ IUHH HQHUJLHV IRU WKH QRQDTXHRXV YV ZDWHU VROYHQWV RU HUURUV LQWURGXFHG E\ WKH HOHFWURFKHPLFDO SRWHQWLDO GHWHUPLQDWLRQV 6LQJOH LRQ VROYDWLRQ IUHH HQHUJLHV IRU 0DFDFf LRQV FDQ EH REWDLQHG IURP $$*VRWYr>0DFDFf @ YDOXHV SURYLGHG WKDW WKH VROYDWLRQ HQHUJ\ IRU WKH JDVSKDVH QHXWUDO LV NQRZQ HT f 7KH VROYDWLRQ IUHH HQHUJ\ IRU WKH QHXWUDO FDQ EH REWDLQHG IURP WKH UHODWLRQVKLS $*VOY>0DFDFfJff $* VR ,Q >0DFDFfFf @ $*VXEr>0DFDFfFf @ ZKHUH WKH WHUP $*BBBr>0DFDFfFf @ LV WKH IUHH HQHUJ\ RI VROXWLRQ RI VROQ FU\VWDOOLQH 0DFDFf 9DOXHV RI $* VXE DUH QRW DYDLODEOH IURP WKH OLWHUDWXUH EXW HVWLPDWHV FDQ EH REWDLQHG IURP $+VXEr>0DFDFfFf@ E\ DVVXPLQJ WKDW $6VXEr>0DFDFfFf @ LV HTXDO WR WKH WUDQVODWLRQDO HQWURS\ RI WKH YDSRU SURGXFHG 7UDQVODWLRQDO HQWURSLHV FDQ EH SUHGLFWHG TXLWH DFFXUDWHO\ IURP WKH 6DFNXU7HWURGH HTXDWLRQ VHH FKDSWHU f )RU FRPSRXQGV VXFK DV 0DFDFf FRPSOH[HV IRU ZKLFK WKH FU\VWDO ODWWLFH LV KHOG E\ HVVHQWLDOO\ 9DQ GHU 9DDOV IRUFHV HVWLPDWHG YDOXHV RI $*VXEr H[SHFWHG WR EH TXLWH UHOLDEOH IRU H[DPSOH WKH H[SHULPHQWDO YDOXH RI $6 VXE IRU QDSKWKDOHQH LV FDO PRO .f ZKLOH WKH 6DFNXU7HWURGH
PAGE 114
UDQV IRU QDSKWKDOHQH WR EH FDO PRO f HTXDWLRQ SUHGLFWV $6W &RQVLGHULQJ WKH 5XDFDFf FRXSOH IURP DQ HVWLPDWHG YDOXH RI $+ VXE RI s NFDO PRO EDVHG RQ WKH YDOXHV IRU RWKHU 0DFDFf FRPSOH[HV WRJHWKHU ZLWK DQ HVWLPDWHG YDOXH RI $6VXEr>5XDFDFfFf@ RI FDO PROn .n D YDOXH RI $*VXEr RI s NFDO PROn LV REWDLQHG $ YDOXH RI $*6ROQr NFDO PRO IRU 5XDFDFfFf LQ ZDWHU FDQ EH FDOFXODWHG IURP LWV VROXELOW\ ZKLFK JLYHV NFDO PROf &RPELQLQJ WKHVH $* VROY RI 5XDFDFfJf LQ ZDWHU RI s GDWD ZLWK $$*VROYr>5X DFDFff@ LQ ZDWHU 7DEOH f JLYHV $*VROYr>5X DFDFfA Jf @ RI s NFDO PRO 7KH YHUWLFDO LRQL]DWLRQ HQHUJLHV RI VHYHUDO UXWKHQLXP WULV% GLNHWRQDWHVf KDYH EHHQ FRPELQHG ZLWK SRODURJUDSKLF GDWD E\ RWKHU ZRUNHUV WR REWDLQ LQIRUPDWLRQ DERXW UHODWLYH VROYDWLRQ HQHUJLHV )RU WKHVH 5X FRPSRXQGV WKH LRQL]DWLRQ LV IURP D PHWDOEDVHG DSSUR[LPDWHO\ QRQn ERQGLQJ RUELWDO DQG WKH 3(6 GDWD PD\ EH MXVLILDEO\ XVHG LQ SODFH RI WKH DGLDEDWLF YDOXHV ZLWK UHODWLYHO\ VPDOO HUURUV 5HODWLYH 6ROYDWLRQ (QHUJLHV RI 5XWIDF:Tf DQG 5XKIDFfATf DQG 7KHLU 1HJDWLYH ,RQV 0DQ\ UXWKHQLXP WULV%GLNHWRQDWHVf DUH VWDEOH ZLWK UHVSHFW WR UHYHUVLEOH RQH HOHFWURQ HOHFWURFKHPLFDO UHGXFWLRQ DQG ( YDOXHV IRU WKHVH FRPSOH[HV KDYH EHHQ UHSRUWHG IRU D YDULHW\ RI GLNHWRQDWH OLJDQGV E\ XVLQJ F\FOLF YROWDPPHWU\n 7KH HVWLPDWHV REWDLQHG LQ WKH SUHVHQW ZRUN IRU JDVSKDVH $*Dr YDOXHV IRU WKH FRPSOH[HV 5XKIDFf 5XWIDFf DQG 5XDFDFf FDQ EH FRPELQHG ZLWK WKH DSSURSULDWH HOHFWURFKHPLFDO GDWD WR \LHOG YDOXHV RI $$*VROYr IRU WKH UHGR[ FRXSOHV 5XWIDFf DQG 5X KI DFfn DQG $*Dr> 5X WI DFf VROQf @ DQG $*Dr>5XKIDFfVROQf @ DV ZDV GRQH DERYH IRU 5XDFDFf DQG WKH RWKHU 0DFDFf FRPSOH[HV 'DWD IRU ( YDOXHV LQ DFHWRQLWULOH DUH DYDLODEOH IRU WKHVH FRPSOH[HV DQG VR WKH YDOXHV REWDLQHG PD\ EH FRPSDUHG WR WKH UHODWHG GDWD LQ 7DEOH )RU 5XWIDFf YDOXHV RI NFDO PROn IRU $$*VROYr>5X WIDFfn@ DQG NFDO -
PAGE 115
PROn IRU $*Dr>5XWIDFfVROQf @ DUH REWDLQHG )RU 5XKIDFf YDOXHV RI NFDO PRO IRU $$*VROYr>5X KIDFfn@ DQG NFDO PROn $*Jr> 5X KI DFf VROQf @ DUH REWDLQHG 7KH YDOXHV RI $$*VROYr VWHDGLO\ GHFUHDVH IRU WKH VHULHV 5XDFDFf 5XWIDFf 5XKIDFf DV WKH GHJUHH RI IOXRULQDWLRQ RI WKH OLJDQG LQFUHDVHV 7KH $*DrVROQf YHUVXV $*DrJf GDWD IRU WKH WKUHH FRPSOH[HV DUH SORWWHG LQ )LJXUH LQ WKH VDPH ZD\ DV ZDV GRQH IRU WKH 0DFDFf FRPSOH[HV LQ )LJXUH 7KH VORSH RI WKH OLQH LV IRU WKH VHULHV RI UXWKHQLXP FRPSOH[HV ZKLFK FDQ EH FRPSDUHG WR WKH YDOXH RI IRU WKH VHULHV RI 0DFDFf FRPSOH[HV 7KH VPDOOHU YDOXH UHIOHFWV WKH GHFUHDVLQJ VROYDWLRQ HQHUJ\ RI WKH 5X%GLNHWRQDWHf DQLRQV ZLWK LQFUHDVLQJ IOXRULQDWLRQ 7KLV UHVXOW LV DQDORJRXV WR WKH REVHUYDWLRQ PDGH IRU D VHULHV RI VXEVWLWXWHG EHQ]R QDSWKR DQG DQWKUDTXLQRQHV WKDW WKH JUHDWHU WKH HOHFWURQ DWWDFKPHQW HQHUJ\ WKH VPDOOHU WKH FRUUHVSRQGLQJ LQFUHDVH LQ WKH (r YDOXHAn ,W ZDV QRWHG WKDW WKH FRPSRXQGV ZLWK JUHDWHU HOHFWURQ DWWDFKPHQW HQHUJLHV DUH WKRVH PRUH DEOH WR GHORFDOL]H WKH QHJDWLYH FKDUJH %\ WKH VDPH DUJXPHQW KRZHYHU WKLV OHDGV WR D FRUUHVSRQGLQJO\ ORZHU VROYDWLRQ HQHUJ\ DV SUHGLFWHG E\ GLHOHFWULF FRQWLQXXP PRGHOV=r $ SORW RI ( YHUVXV $*DrJf YDOXHV IRU WKH RUJDQLF DFFHSWRUV OHG WR FXUYDWXUH LQ WKH VORSH OLQH DW KLJKHU HQHUJLHV ZLWK WKH VORSH RI WKH OLQH EHFRPLQJ OHVV WKDQ XQLW\ $Q DQDORJRXV UDWLRQDOH FDQ EH DSSOLHG WR WKH GLIIHUHQFH LQ WKH VORSH RI WKH $*DrVROQf YHUVXV $*DrJf YDOXHV IRU WKH 0DFDFf DQG 5X% GLNHWRQDWHf FRPSOH[HV )RU WKH 0DFDFf LRQV WKH GLVWULEXWLRQ RI QHJDWLYH FKDUJH LV SUREDEO\ DIIHFWHG OLWWOH E\ WKH QDWXUH RI WKH PHWDO ZKLFK DFFRXQWV IRU WKH UHODWLYHO\ FRQVWDQW YDOXH RI $$* REWDLQHG IRU Z8 Y 9 WKH VHULHV RI 0DFDFff UHGR[ FRXSOHV )RU WKH VHULHV RI 5X WULV% GLNHWRQDWHf FRPSOH[HV WKH QHJDWLYH LQGXFWLYH HIIHFW f RI WKH IOXRULQH DWRPV ZLOO VHUYH WR GHORFDOL]H WKH QHJDWLYH FKDUJH 7KH UHVXOWDQW HIIHFW LV WKDW WKH JDVSKDVH HOHFWURQ DWWDFKPHQW HQHUJLHV LQFUHDVH ZLWK
PAGE 116
$*Dr5Xf§GLNHWRQDWHAVROQff NFDO PROf $*D5X6f§GcNHWRQDWHfJff NFDO PRO )LJXUH 3ORW RI HOHFWURQ DWWDFKPHQW HQHUJLHV IRU 5X%GLNHWRQDWHf FRPSOH[HV LQ WKH JDVSKDVH YHUVXV VROXWLRQ DFHWRQLWULOHf
PAGE 117
,OO LRQV GHFUHDVH 6LQFH WKH YDOXHV RI ( IrU WALH FRXSOHV EHFRPH PRUH LQFUHDVLQJ IOXRULQDWLRQ ZKLOH WKH VROYDWLRQ HQHUJLHV RI WKH QHJDWLYH SRVLWLYH LQ YDOXH PRUH VWURQJO\ R[LGL]LQJf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f WKDW FDQ EH GLUHFWO\ LQFRUSRUDWHG LQWR WKHUPRFKHPLFDO F\FOHV 2WKHU PHWKRGV RI GHWHUPLQLQJ VXFK HQHUJLHV VXFK DV SKRWRHOHFWURQ VSHFWURVFRS\ DUH OHVV JHQHUDOO\ XVHIXO VLQFH WUDQVLWLRQ PHWDO FRPSOH[HV RIWHQ XQGHUJR ODUJH JHRPHWU\ FKDQJHV XSRQ R[LGDWLRQ RU UHGXFWLRQ WKDW FDQ OHDG WR HUURQHRXV HVWLPDWHV RI WKHUPDO HOHFWURQ DWWDFKPHQW RU LRQL]DWLRQ HQHUJLHV ,Q DGGLWLRQ ZKHQ FRPELQHG ZLWK VROXWLRQ HOHFWURFKHPLFDO GDWD WKH $*Dr YDOXHV IRU WKH JDVSKDVH QHXWUDO FRPSOH[HV KDYH OHG WR WKH PRVW H[WHQVLYH HYDOXDWLRQ WR GDWH RI GLIIHUHQWLDO VROYDWLRQ HQHUJLHV $$*VROYr IRU WUDQVLWLRQ PHWDO FRPSOH[ UHGR[ FRXSOHV ,Q FRQWUDVW WR WKH UHVXOWV IRU WKH PHWDOORFHQHPHWDOORFHQLXP FRXSOHV UHSRUWHG HOVHZKHUH WKH %RUQ FKDUJLQJ PRGHO GRHV QRW SURYLGH D UHDVRQDEOH HVWLPDWH RI WKH GLIIHUHQWLDO VROYDWLRQ IUHH HQHUJ\ IRU WKH WULV FKHODWH FRPSOH[HV VWXGLHG KHUH $OWKRXJK WKH LQDGHTXDF\ RI WKH %RUQ PRGHO FRPELQHG ZLWK FU\VWDOORJUDSKLF UDGLL IRU SUHGLFWLQJ VROYDWLRQ IUHH HQHUJ\ FKDQJHV IRU UHGR[ SURFHVVHV IRU PDQ\ WUDQVLWLRQ PHWDO FRPSOH[HV KDV EHHQ VXJJHVWHG
PAGE 118
LQ RWKHU FRQWH[WV HJ LQ DWWHPSWHG ILWV RI RSWLFDO HOHFWURQWUDQVIHU SKHQRPHQD XVLQJ WKH GLHOHFWULF FRQWLQXXP PRGHOf GLUHFW WKHUPRFKHPLFDO HYDOXDWLRQ RI WKHVH HIIHFWV KDV EHHQ ODFNLQJ XQWLO WKLV VWXG\ )LQDOO\ WKH $$*VTYr YDOXHV FDQ EH XVHG WR GHULYH VLQJOH LRQ VROYDWLRQ IUHH HQHUJLHV IRU FRPSOH[ LRQV LI WKH IUHH HQHUJ\ RI VROYDWLRQ IRU WKH QHXWUDO FRPSOH[ LV DYDLODEOH ,Q FRQVLGHULQJ WKH GDWD LQ 7DEOHV DQG LW LV VWULNLQJ WR QRWH KRZ JUHDWO\ WKH WKH UDQJH DQG PDJQLWXGH RI WKH HOHFWURQ DWWDFKPHQW HQHUJLHV IRU WKH IUHH 0Jf LRQV H9f DUH GLPLQLVKHG LQ FRUUHVSRQGLQJ WKH 0DFDFf FRPSOH[HV H9f 6ROYDWLRQ RI D JDVSKDVH 0DFDFf FRPSOH[ LQFUHDVHV WKH HOHFWURQ DWWDFKPHQW HQHUJ\ E\ D UHODWLYHO\ FRQVWDQW DPRXQW f 9 IRU DFHWRQLWULOH DV WKH VROYHQWf 7KH UROH RI VROYDWLRQ LV WKHUHIRUH VRPHZKDW VHFRQGDU\ WR WKDW RI OLJDWLRQ F\FOH LQ )LJXUH f LQ GHWHUPLQLQJ WKH PDJQLWXGH RI WKH HOHFWURGH SRWHQWLDO IRU D SDUWLFXODU 0DFDFff UHGR[ FRXSOH +RZHYHU ZKHQ FRQVLGHUHG RQ WKH VFDOH RI W\SLFDO IUHH HQHUJ\ FKDQJHV IRU KRPRJHQHRXV UHGR[ UHDFWLRQV RI WUDQVLWLRQ PHWDO FRPSOH[HV FKDQJHV LQ VROYDWLRQ HQHUJLHV LQ UHDFWDQWV DQG SURGXFWV FOHDUO\ FDQ KDYH D SURIRXQG LQIOXHQFH RQ WKH UHDFWLRQ WKHUPRG\QDPLFV $V PRUH JDVSKDVH GDWD EHFRPH DYDLODEOH D PRUH FRPSOHWH TXDQWLWDWLYH XQGHUVWDQGLQJ RI VROYDWLRQ DQG ERQG HQHUJLHV LQ FRRUGLQDWLRQ FKHPLVWU\ ZLOO FHUWDLQO\ UHVXOW
PAGE 119
&+$37(5 ,17(535(7$7,21 2) 7+( 75(1'6 ,1 7+( (/(&7521 $77$&+0(17 )5(( (1(5*,(6 2) 7+( 75,6$&(7$&(721$7(f $1' 75,6+(;$)/8252$&(7$&(721$7(f &203/(;(6 2) 7+( 0(7$/6 7L&R 86,1* 7+( 6,03/( /,*$1' ),(/' 02'(/ ,QWURGXFWLRQ 3UHYLRXV DFFRXQWV LQ WKH OLWHUDWXUH WKDW FRPSDUH SHULRGLF WUHQGV LQ HOHFWURQ DWWDFKPHQW HQHUJLHV IRU VHULHV RI WUDQVLWLRQ PHWDO LRQV LQ D JLYHQ FRRUGLQDWLRQ HQYLURQPHQW KDYH EHHQ UHVWULFWHG WR VWXGLHV RI WUHQGV LQ HOHFWURFKHPLFDO UHGXFWLRQ SRWHQWLDOV (r RU ( YDOXHVf VLQFH JDV SKDVH HOHFWURQ DWWDFKPHQW HQHUJ\ GDWD ZHUH QRW WKHQ DYDLODEOH ,Q WKHVH HDUO\ UHSRUWV OLJDQG ILHOG WKHRU\ ZDV XVHG WR H[SODLQ WKH REVHUYHG WUHQGV LQ HOHFWURFKHPLFDO UHGXFWLRQ SRWHQWLDOV 2QH RI WKH PRVW ZHOO NQRZQ DQG FRQWLQXRXV VHULHV RI UHGR[ FRXSOHV LV WKH 0+fDTf VHULHV ZKHUH 0 UHSUHVHQWV D ILUVW URZ WUDQVLWLRQ PHWDO DQG WUHQGV LQ UHGR[ SRWHQWLDOV IRU WKLV VHULHV KDYH SHUKDSV UHFHLYHG WKH PRVW DWWHQWLRQ LQ WKH OLWHUDWXUH $ FORVH FRUUHODWLRQ KDV EHHQ GHPRQVWUDWHG EHWZHHQ WKH WUHQGV LQ WKH WKLUG LRQL]DWLRQ SRWHQWLDO RI WKH VHULHV RI 0Jf LRQV DQG WKH R[LGDWLRQ SRWHQWLDOV IRU WKH VHULHV RI 0+fDTf FRXSOHV DIWHU FRUUHFWLRQ IRU OLJDQG ILHOG HIIHFWV LQ WKH FRPSOH[HV 7KH GLIIHUHQFH LQ DEVROXWH PDJQLWXGHV KDV DOVR EHHQ TXLWH DFFXUDWHO\ DFFRXQWHG IRU E\ WKH XVH RI WKHUPRFKHPLFDO F\FOHV WKDW LQYROYH WKH KHWHURO\WLF PHWDOOLJDQG ERQG HQHUJLHV LQ WKH R[LGL]HG DQG UHGXFHG FRPSOH[HV VROYDWLRQ HQHUJLHV DQG DQ HVWLPDWH RI WKH DEVROXWH SRWHQWLDO RI WKH VWDQGDUG K\GURJHQ HOHFWURGH 7KHVH UHODWLRQVKLSV ZHUH GLVFXVVHG IRU 0DFDFf FRPSOH[HV LQ FKDSWHU $ PRUH FRPSOHWH XQGHUVWDQGLQJ RI WKH HOHFWURQLF HIIHFWV WKDW GHWHUPLQH WKH PDJQLWXGHV DQG WUHQGV RI HOHFWURQ DWWDFKPHQW HQHUJLHV IRU
PAGE 120
PHWDO FRPSOH[HV FRXOG EH JDLQHG IURP GHWDLOHG PROHFXODU RUELWDO FDOFXODWLRQV SHUIRUPHG RQ ERWK WKH R[LGL]HG DQG UHGXFHG IRUPV RI D VHULHV RI FRPSOH[HV +RZHYHU WKH FU\VWDO ILHOG PRGHO ZKLFK KDV SUHYLRXVO\ EHHQ XVHG WR H[SODLQ WUHQGV LQ HOHFWURFKHPLFDO UHGXFWLRQ SRWHQWLDOV LV DSSOLHG KHUH WR WKH WUHQGV LQ JDVSKDVH $*Dr YDOXHV IRU WKH 0DFDFf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f LQ )LJXUH WKH GLIIHUHQFH LQ HOHFWURQ DWWDFKPHQW IUHH HQHUJ\ EHWZHHQ D IUHH LRQ DQG D JDVSKDVH FRPSOH[HG LRQ LV JLYHQ E\ HT DQG WKDW EHWZHHQ D IUHH LRQ DQG D FRPSOH[HG LRQ LQ VROXWLRQ E\ HT $*Dr>0/\QJf@ $*Dr>0]Jf@ $$*KHWr> 0/\fQQ @ $*Dr>0/0QJf @ $$*KHWr> 0/\fQQn @ $$*VROYr> 0/\f QQ @ ,Q HTV DQG WKH WHUP $$*KHWr> 0/\fQQf @ LV WKH GLIIHUHQFH EHWZHHQ WKH WRWDO KHWHURO\WLF PHWDOOLJDQG ERQG IUHH HQHUJLHV LQ WKH
PAGE 121
R[LGL]HG DQG UHGXFHG FRPSOH[ DQG $$*VRO\r> 0/\fQQn` @ LV WKH GLIIHUHQFH EHWZHHQ WKH IUHH HQHUJLHV RI VROYDWLRQ IRU WKH R[LGL]HG DQG WKH UHGXFHG FRPSOH[ 6XEVWLWXWLQJ 0/\QJf 0DFDFf IRU WKH FRPSOH[HV VWXGLHG LQ WKH SUHVHQW ZRUN LQWR HT DQG VHSDUDWLQJ IUHH HQHUJ\ WHUPV LQWR HQWKDOSLF DQG HQWURSLF FRQWULEXWLRQV HT OHDGV WR HT (OHFWURQ DWWDFKPHQW HQHUJLHV IRU IUHH PHWDO LRQV DUH JLYHQ E\ WKH QHJDWLYH YDOXH RI WKH WKLUG LRQL]DWLRQ SRWHQWLDO ,3f RI WKH PHWDO DQG DSSO\ WR D WHPSHUDWXUH RI DEVROXWH ]HUR 7KURXJKRXW WKLV GLVVHUWDWLRQ WKH VWDWLRQDU\ HOHFWURQ FRQYHQWLRQ LV DGRSWHG IRU GHDOLQJ ZLWK WKH WKHUPRFKHPLVWU\ RI HOHFWURQ DWWDFKPHQW WR JDVSKDVH VSHFLHV 7KLV FRQYHQWLRQ DSSOLHG WR IUHH HQHUJLHV RI HOHFWURQ DWWDFKPHQW ZDV GLVFXVVHG LQ FKDSWHU 8QGHU WKH VWDWLRQDU\ HOHFWURQ FRQYHQWLRQ WKH HOHFWURQ KDV QR KHDW FDSDFLW\ RU HQWURS\ DQG WKHUHIRUH ,3 DQG $+Dr>0/\QJf@ DUH HTXLYDOHQW DW DOO WHPSHUDWXUHV 6LQFH WKH $*Dr>0DFDFfJf @ YDOXHV REWDLQHG LQ WKH SUHVHQW ZRUN DUH IRU WKH PHWDOV 7L&R IURP HT DQG )LJXUH WKH\ FDQ EH UHODWHG WR WKH YDOXHV RI $+Dr>0]Jf@ IRU WKH FRUUHVSRQGLQJ IUHH LRQV 7L&Rf 9DOXHV RI $+Dr>0Jf @ IRU WKH PHWDOV 7L&R LQ 7DEOH DUH SORWWHG LQ )LJXUH Df 7KH RULJLQV RI WKH FKDUDFWHULVWLF WUHQG OLQH DUH ZHOO HVWDEOLVKHG DQG KDYH EHHQ VHPLTXDQWLWDWLYHO\ GLVFXVVHG E\ *ULIILWK XVLQJ WKH 6ODWHU&RQGRQ6KRUWO\ PRGHO RI WKH HOHFWURQLF VWUXFWXUH RI IUHH DWRPV DQG LRQV ,Q )LJXUH Df WKH RYHUDOO LQFUHDVH LQ $+Dr>0Jf@ YDOXHV ZLWK LQFUHDVLQJ DWRPLF QXPEHU RI WKH PHWDO LV DWWULEXWHG WR WKH LQFUHDVH LQ QXFOHDU FKDUJH 7KH YDULDQFH ZLWKLQ WKH XSZDUG WUHQG LV D UHVXOW RI GLIIHUHQFHV LQ HH H[FKDQJH DQG UHSXOVLRQ HQHUJLHV RSHUDWLQJ LQ HDFK 00 FRXSOH 7KH DEUXSW GHFUHDVH LQ
PAGE 122
)LJXUH 3ORW RI WUHQGV LQ HOHFWURQ DWWDFKPHQW HQHUJLHV 8SSHU SORW OLQH Df VKRZV WKH HOHFWURQ DWWDFKPHQW HQHUJLHV IRU IUHH 0Jf LRQV /RZHU SORW OLQH Ef VKRZV WKH HOHFWURQ DWWDFKPHQW IUHH HQHUJLHV IRU WKH 0DFDFf FRPSOH[HV DQG WKH YDOXHV FRUUHFWHG IRU OLJDQI ILHOG HIIHFWV OLQH Ff
PAGE 123
$+D>0Jf@ IURP 0Q WR )H SURYLGHV D JRRG LOOXVWUDWLRQ RI WKHVH HIIHFWV )RUPLQJ 0Q Gf IURP 0Q Gf UHVXOWV LQ WKH VLQJOH ODUJHVW LQFUHDVH LQ WKH QXPEHU RI VWDELOL]LQJ HOHFWURQ H[FKDQJH LQWHUDFWLRQV 7KH HQKDQFHG VWDELOLW\ RI WKH G FRQILJXUDWLRQ LV FRPPRQO\ UHIHUUHG WR DV WKH VSHFLDO VWDELOLW\ RI WKH KDOIILOOHG VKHOO 2Q IRUPLQJ )H Gf IURP )H Gf WKH DGGHG HOHFWURQ HQWHUV D VLQJO\ RFFXSLHG RUELWDO ZLWK VSLQ DQWLSDUDOOHO WR WKH ILYH HOHFWURQV DOUHDG\ SUHVHQW 7KH HIIHFW RI WKH HOHFWURQ UHSXOVLRQ FDQQRW EH VWDELOL]HG E\ H[FKDQJH LQWHUDFWLRQV VLQFH WKHUH DUH QR RWKHU G HOHFWURQV RI WKH VDPH VSLQf DQG WKH UHVXOW LV WKDW $+D LV DSSUR[LPDWHO\ NFDO PRO OHVV HQHUJHWLF IRU )H WKDQ IRU 0Q GHVSLWH WKH JUHDWHU QXFOHDU FKDUJH RI )LJXUH Ef VKRZV D SORW RI WKH YDOXHV RI $*Dr>0DFDFfJf @ REWDLQHG LQ WKH SUHVHQW ZRUN ZKLFK DUH JLYHQ LQ 7DEOH 2Q FRPSDULVRQ WR WKH SORW RI $+Dr>0Jf @ YDOXHV LQ )LJXUH Df WKH PRVW VWULNLQJ GLIIHUHQFH LV WKDW WKH YDOXHV RI $* r>0DFDFfJf DUH LQ WKH UDQJH RI H9 OHVV H[RWKHUPLF WKDQ WKH YDOXHV RI $+Dr>0Jf@ $OVR DOWKRXJK WKH LQFUHDVLQJ WUHQG LQ $+Dr>0Jf @ YDOXHV IURP RQ JRLQJ IURP OHIWWRULJKW LV DOVR GLVFHUQHG LQ WKH WUHQG IRU WKH FRPSOH[HV WKH UDQJH LQ YDOXHV LV UHGXFHG IURP f H9 WR aH9 FRXSOHG ZLWK VRPH SURPLQHQW GLIIHUHQFHV EHWZHHQ WKH WZR WUHQG OLQHV )URP WKH ULJKWKDQG VLGH RI HT WKH GLIIHUHQFH EHWZHHQ HOHFWURQ DWWDFKPHQW HQHUJLHV IRU $+Dr>0Jf@ DQG $*Dr>0DFDFf Jf @ FDQ EH DWWULEXWHG WR WKH WHUPV $$+KHWr>0DFDFf @ DQG 7$6Dr>0DFDFfJf @ 7KH HQWURS\ FKDQJH DFFRPSDQ\LQJ HOHFWURQ DWWDFKPHQW WR 0DFDFf FRPSOH[HV ZDV GLVFXVVHG LQ FKDSWHU ZKHUH VRPH HYLGHQFH ZDV SUHVHQWHG WKDW VXJJHVWV WKDW $6Dr>0DFDFfJf @ LV SUREDEO\ EHWZHHQ FDO PRO +HQFH DV GLFXVVHG LQ FKDSWHU WKH H[SHULPHQWDO YDOXHV RI $*Dr>0DFDFfJf @ DW a REWDLQHG LQ WKH SUHVHQW ZRUN DUH H[SHFWHG WR EH D IHZ NFDO PROn JUHDWHU WKDQ IRU $+Dr>0DFDFfJf @ 7KLV GLIIHUHQFH LV VPDOO FRPSDUHG WR WKH YDOXHV RI $$+KHWr>0DFDFff@ m
PAGE 124
NFDO PROn VHH 7DEOH f DQG VR WKH YDOXH RI $$+KHWr>0DFDFfn @ DUH WKH SULQFLSOH FDXVH RI WKH ODUJH GLIIHUHQFH LQ HOHFWURQ DWWDFKPHQW HQHUJLHV EHWZHHQ WKH IUHH LRQV DQG WKH FRPSOH[HV )XUWKHU WKH LUUHJXODULW\ LQ WKH SHULRGLF YDULDQFH RI $$+KHWr>0DFDFff@ YDOXHV FDQ EH LGHQWLILHG DV WKH PDMRU FDXVH RI WKH SURPLQHQW GLIIHUHQFHV EHWZHHQ WKH SHULRGLF YDULDQFH RI $*Dr>0DFDFfJf @ DQG $+Dr>0Jf @ YDOXHV 7UHQGV LQ KHWHURO\WLF 0/ ERQG HQHUJLHV LQYROYLQJ WUDQVLWLRQ PHWDO 0 DQG 0 LRQV GLVSOD\ D FKDUDFWHULVWLF GRXEOH SHULRGLF YDULDQFH RYHU WKH HOHFWURQLF FRQILJXUDWLRQV GrG DW WKH PHWDO FHQWHU )RU H[DPSOH )LJXUH VKRZV WKH WUHQGV LQ WKH HQWKDOSLHV RI K\GUDWLRQ $+K\Grf IRU WKH VHULHV RI LRQV 6F *D DQG &D =Q ZKLFK VSDQ WKH HOHFWURQLF FRQILJXUDWLRQV Gr G 9DOXHV IRU 6F 1L &X DQG =Q DUH XQNQRZQ )RU ERWK VHULHV D UHODWLYHO\ VWUDLJKW OLQH FDQ EH GUDZQ WKURXJK WKH SRLQWV IRU WKH Gr G DQG G LRQV $ VLPSOH LQWHUSUHWDWLRQ RI WKH GHYLDWLRQV IURP D OLQHDU LQFUHDVH LQ $+K\Gr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
PAGE 125
)LJXUH 3ORW RI WKH HQWKDOSLHV RI K\GUDWLRQ RI WKH ILUVW WUDQVLWLRQ PHWDO VHULHV DQG LRQV Df 0 LRQV Ef 0 LRQV
PAGE 126
327(17,$/ (1(5*< 8r (OHFWURQ DWWDFKPHQW HQHUJ\ RI IUHH LRQ &RUUHFWHGf (A0DFDFf 0DFDFf &RPSOH[ )UHH ,RQ )LJXUH (IIHFW RI DQ RFWDKHGUDO OLJDQG ILHOG RQ WKH HQHUJLHV RI WKH G RUELWDOV RI 0 DQG 0 LRQV
PAGE 127
WKH SRLQW FKDUJHV WKDQ WKH RUELWDOV RI WJ V\PPHWU\ ZKLFK DUH GLUHFWHG EHWZHHQ WKH D[HV 7KHUHIRUH WKH H VHW OLH DW KLJKHU HQHUJ\ UHODWLYH WR WKH WJ VHW 7KHVH HIIHFWV DUH LOOXVWUDWHG IRU 0 DQG 0 LRQV LQ )LJXUH 7KH OLJDQGILHOG SDUDPHWHU WKDW H[SUHVVHV WKH PDJQLWXGH RI WKH VSOLWWLQJ LQ HQHUJ\ RI WKH G RUELWDOV LV 'T 7KH WJ RUELWDOV OLH DW DQ HQHUJ\ RI 'T ORZHU WKDQ WKH HQHUJ\ EDU\FHQWHU UHVXOWLQJ IURP WKH VSKHULFDO FRPSRQHQW RI WKH HOHFWURVWDWLF ILHOG DQG WKH H VHW OLH 'T KLJKHU )LJXUH f 7KH HQHUJ\ GLIIHUHQFH EHWZHHQ WKH WZR VHWV RI RUELWDOV LV WKHUHIRUH O2'T 1RWH WKDW WKH HQHUJ\ RI WKH G RUELWDOV IRU WKH 0 LRQ DUH UDLVHG LQ HQHUJ\ WR D JUHDWHU GHJUHH WKDQ IRU WKH 0 LRQ ,Q WKH FU\VWDO ILHOG PRGHO WKLV LV FDXVHG E\ WKH VWURQJHU DWWUDFWLRQ RI WKH QHJDWLYH SRLQW FKDUJHV WR WKH FKDUJH WKDQ WKH FKDUJH DQG LV WKH LQWHUSUHWDWLRQ RI WKH JUHDWHU PHWDOOLJDQG ERQG VWUHQJWK LQ WKH 0DFDFf FRPSOH[HV WKDQ 0DFDFfn 9DOXHV RI O2'T FDQ EH REWDLQHG TXLWH FRQYHQLHQWO\ IURP DEVRUEDQFH VSHFWUD XVXDOO\ LQ WKH YLVLEOH UHJLRQ 7KLV FDQ EH GRQH JUDSKLFDOO\ E\ XVLQJ WHUP GLDJUDPV 7KH PHDVXUHG VSHFWUXP LV ILWWHG DV FORVHO\ DV SRVVLEOH WR WKH GLDJUDP DQG WKH 'T RU 'T% YDOXH LV UHDG IURP WKH DEVFLVVD ,Q VRPH FDVHV G G DQG Gf WKH PD[LPXP RI WKH ILUVW VSLQDOORZHG EDQG \LHOGV WKH YDOXH RI O2'T GLUHFWO\ ,Q RWKHU FDVHV G G ORZ VSLQf DQG Gf O2'T FDQQRW EH REWDLQHG GLUHFWO\ DQG FRQILJXUDWLRQ RU WHUP LQWHUDFWLRQ PXVW EH FRQVLGHUHG ,Q WKH FU\VWDO ILHOG PRGHO IRU DQ\ KLJKVSLQ GHOHFWURQ FRQILJXUDWLRQ VXEMHFW WR WKH VDPH RFWDKHGUDO OLJDQG ILHOG WKH HQHUJLHV RI WKH FRQILJXUDWLRQV Gr G DQG G DUH XQDIIHFWHG E\ WKH YDOXH RI O2'T VLQFH WKH VWDELOL]LQJ HIIHFW RI RFFXS\LQJ WKH WJ RUELWDO VHW LV RIIVHW E\ DQ HTXLYDOHQW ORVV RI HQHUJ\ E\ RFFXS\LQJ WKH HJ VHW $OO RWKHU JURXQG VWDWH FRQILJXUDWLRQV DUH VWDELOL]HG UHODWLYH WR WKH K\SRWKHWLFDO FDVH ZKHUH WKH G RUELWDOV DUH GHJHQHUDWH LQ WKH FRPSOH[HV GXH WR SUHGRPLQDQW RFFXSDQF\ RI WKH ORZHU HQHUJ\ WJ VHW 7KH ORZHULQJ LQ HQHUJ\ LV WHUPHG WKH OLJDQG ILHOG VWDELOL]DWLRQ HQHUJ\ /)6(f )RU
PAGE 128
W\SLFDO YDOXHV RI O2'T /)6( FDQ EH VLJQLILFDQW DQG JLYHV ULVH WR WKH FKDUDFWHULVWLF GRXEOH SHULRGLF WUHQG REVHUYHG LQ )LJXUH )RU H[DPSOH 'T IRU WKH FRPSOH[ &U+f ZKLFK KDV D G FRQILJXUDWLRQ LV FP 7KH WKUHH G HOHFWURQV LV 'T NFDO PROn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f &RUUHODWLQJ WUHQGV LQ $*DrU0DFDFf Tf DQG $+DrU0rTQ XVLQJ VSHFWURVFRSLF /)6( YDOXHV ,W LV FRQYHQLHQW WR VHSDUDWH WKH WKH GLIIHUHQFH LQ KHWHURO\WLF ERQG HQWKDOSLHV IRU WKH 0DFDFf DQG 0DFDFf FRPSOH[HV LQWR WZR FRPSRQHQWV DFFRUGLQJ WR HT $$+KHWr>0DFDFfn@ $$+KHWR>0DFDFfn@ $/)6( ,Q HT WKH WHUP $$+KHWR>0DFDFf @ LV WKH GLIIHUHQFH LQ KHWHURO\WLF ERQG HQWKDOS\ WKDW ZRXOG DULVH IURP WKH SXUHO\ VSKHULFDO FRPSRQHQW RI WKH OLJDQG ILHOG LQ WKH FU\VWDO ILHOG PRGHO DQG LQFOXGHV HOHFWURVWDWLF FRYDOHQW SRODUL]DWLRQ DQG VWHULF HIIHFWV QRW SUHVHQW LQ $/)6( &RPELQLQJ HTXDWLRQV DQG JLYHV HTXDWLRQ
PAGE 129
$*Dr>0DFDFfJf @ $/)6( $+Dr>0Jf@ $$+KHWr>0 f@ 7$6Dr>0DFDFfJf @ f 6LQFH WKH SHULRGLF YDULDQFH RI $$+KHW>0DFDFfXf @ B FDQ EH H[SHFWHG WR EH HVVHQWLDOO\ VPRRWK DQG WKH HIIHFWV RI 7$6Dr>0DFDFfJf @ f DUH UHODWLYHO\ PLQRU IURP HT D SORW RI $* r>0DFDFfJf @ $/)6( FDQ EH G H[SHFWHG WR UHSURGXFH WKH WUHQG OLQH JHQHUDWHG E\ WKH YDOXHV RI $+Dr>0Jf@ LQ )LJXUH Df +RZHYHU LQ RUGHU WR FDOFXODWH $/)6( LW LV QHFHVVDU\ WR REWDLQ YDOXHV RI 'T IRU ERWK WKH 0DFDFf FRPSOH[HV DQG WKH 0DFDFf LRQV 7KHUH KDYH EHHQ VHYHUDO UHSRUWV LQ WKH OLWHUDWXUH RQ WKH OLJDQG ILHOG SDUDPHWHUV IRU 0DFDFf FRPSOH[HV GHWHUPLQHG IURP DQDO\VHV RI YLVLEOH VSHFWUD 8QIRUWXQDWHO\ WKH SUHVHQFH RI LQWHQVH FKDUJH WUDQVIHU EDQGV SDUWO\ REVFXUH WKH GG WUDQVLWLRQV PDNLQJ LW GLIILFXOW WR REWDLQ UHOLDEOH YDOXHV +RZHYHU -RUJHQVHQ I SDUDPHWHUV FDQ EH GHULYHG IRU %GLNHWRQDWH OLJDQGV DQG YDOXHV RI O2'T RI VXIILFLHQW DFFXUDF\ PD\ EH REWDLQHG IRU 0DFDFf DQG 0DFDFff FRPSOH[HV ZKHQ FRPELQHG ZLWK HVWDEOLVKHG J SDUDPHWHUV IRU WKH 0,,,f DQG 0,,f LRQV UHVSHFWLYHO\ 9DOXHV RI I IRU D VHULHV RI WULV%GLNHWRQDWHf FKURPLXP FRPSOH[HV KDYH EHHQ GHWHUPLQHG E\ GHWHUPLQLQJ WKH DEVRUEDQFH PD[LPXP RI WKH $ J 7J WUDQVLWLRQ IRU HDFK FRPSOH[ LQ D VROXWLRQ RI $IW FKORURIRUPn 7KH HQHUJ\ RI WKLV WUDQVLWLRQ JLYHV D YDOXH RI O2'T GLUHFWO\ 9DOXHV RI I IRU &UDFDFf DQG &UKIDFf ZHUH FDOFXODWHG WR EH DQG UHVSHFWLYHO\ DQG ZHUH IRXQG WR EH DOPRVW LGHQWLFDO IRU DOO WKH RWKHU FRPSOH[HV VWXGLHG 7R GHWHUPLQH ZKHWKHU WKHVH I YDOXHV DUH DSSOLFDEOH WR JDVSKDVH FRPSOH[HV WKH DEVRUEDQFH PD[LPXP RI WKH A$J } 7J WUDQVLWLRQ ZDV PHDVXUHG IRU &UKIDFf LQ WKH JDVSKDVH DW a. DQG LQ HWKDQRO VROXWLRQ 7KH UHVXOWV DUH SUHVHQWHG LQ )LJXUH
PAGE 130
)LJXUH &RPSDULVRQ RI WKH EDQG PD[LPD IRU WKH 7J WUDQVLWLRQ LQ &UKIDFfA /LQH D LV WKH DEVRUEDQFH RI &UKIDFf LQ WKH JDVSKDVH DQG OLQH E LV WKH DEVRUEDQFH LQ VROXWLRQ HWKDQROf
PAGE 131
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fFRXSOH VLQFH &RDFDFfM KDV D ORZVSLQ GA FRQILJXUDWLRQ )URP WKH DSSURSULDWH OLJDQG ILHOG H[SUHVVLRQV 7DQDEH DQG 6XJDQR KDYH VKRZQ WKLV HQHUJ\ WR EH HTXDO WR % & ZKHUH % DQG & DUH WKH 5DFDK HOHFWURQ UHSXOVLRQ SDUDPHWHUV IRU WKH PHWDO FRPSOH[ 9DOXHV RI 'T DQG $/6)( IRU WKH JDVSKDVH 0DFDFf FRXSOHV DUH JLYHQ LQ 7DEOH 7KH YDOXH RI $/)6( IRU WKH &RDFDFf LQFOXGHV WKH YDOXH RI % & UHTXLUHG WR FRUUHFW IRU WKH SDLULQJ HQHUJ\ LQ ORZVSLQ G &RDFDFf 9DOXHV RI WKH 5DFDK SDUDPHWHUV % DQG & IRU &RDFDFf KDYH EHHQ GHWHUPLQHG E\ 7VLDPLV DQG FRZRUNHUV WR EH % FP DQG & FP 7KH YDOXH RI $/)6( IRU WKH &RDFDFf FRXSOH LV JLYHQ E\ 'T&R,,ff 'T&R,,,fff % &f H9 7DEOH f ,Q )LJXUH Ef OLQH F WKH WUHQG OLQH LV VKRZQ WKDW UHVXOWV IURP VXEWUDFWLQJ WKH DSSURSULDWH YDOXHV RI $/)6( IURP WKH H[SHULPHQWDO $* r >0DFDFfJf@ YDOXHV $V FDQ EH VHHQ WKHUH LV D VWULNLQJ
PAGE 132
7DEOH /LJDQG )LHOG 3DUDPHWHUV IRU 0DFDFfn &RPSOH[HV 0 J O2AFPrn $/6)(H9E 9,,f 9,,,f &U,,f &U,,,f 0Q,,f 0Q,,,f )H,,f )H,,,f &R,,f &R,,,f r D$ IJ ZLWK IDFDFf NRLIIHUHQFH LQ OLJDQG ILHOG VWDELOL]DWLRQ HQHUJLHV VWURQG ILHOG OLPLWf IRU WKH SURFHVV 0DFDFf r 0DFDFff $ QHJDWLYH YDOXH LPSOLHV WKDW WKH HOHFWURQ DWWDFKPHQW LV IDYRUHG E\ /)6( F,QFOXGHV SDLULQJ HQHUJ\ % & VHH WH[Wf UHVHPEOHQFH WR WKH WUHQG OLQH IRU WKH $+Dr>0Jf@ YDOXHV VXJJHVWLQJ WKDW WKH VLPSOH FU\VWDO ILHOG PRGHO LV DGHTXDWH WR H[SODLQ WKH GLYHUJHQFH RI WKH IHDWXUHV RI WKH WUHQG OLQHV IRU WKH $+Dr>0nJf @ DQG $*Dr>0DFDFfJf@ YDOXHV 7UHQGV LQ $*r YDOXHV IRU 0KIDFf FRPSOH[HV 7KH RUGHU RI WKH PHWDOV 0f LQ WKH VHULHV RI 0KIDFf FRPSOH[HV IRU LQFUHDVLQJ YDOXHV RI $*Dr>0KIDFfJf @ KDYH EHHQ GHWHUPLQHG LQ WKLV ZRUN WR EH WKH VDPH DV WKDW IRU WKH VHULHV RI 0DFDFf FRPSOH[HV 6LQFH $*Dr IRU 9KIDFf ZDV IRXQG WR EH DSSUR[LPDWHO\ NFDO PRO JUHDWHU WKDQ IRU 9DFDFf LW KDV EHHQ DVVXPHG WKDW $*J IRU DOO RWKHU 0KIDFf FRPSOH[HV DUH DOVR a NFDO PRO WKDQ WKH 0DFDFf FRPSOH[HV RI WKH VDPH PHWDO 7KH
PAGE 133
YDOXHV RI $6Jr IRU 0DFDFfA FRPSOH[HV FDQ EH H[SHFWHG WR EH VLPLODU WR WKH YDOXHV IRU WKH FRUUHVSRQGLQJ 0KIDFfM FRPSOH[HV DQG VR IURP HT WKH KLJKHU $*Jr YDOXHV IRU WKH 0KIDFf FRPSOH[HV PXVW UHVXOW IURP $$+KHWr>0DFDFf@ EHLQJ JUHDWHU WKDQ $$+KHWr>0KIDFf@ E\ NFDO PROn ,Q WKH 0KIDFf FRPSOH[HV WKH IOXRULQH DWRPV H[HUW D VWURQJ QHJDWLYH LQGXFWLYH f HIIHFW $V D UHVXOW WKH HOHFWURQ GHQVLW\ LQ WKH KLJKHVW RFFXSLHG PROHFXODU RUELWDO +202f RI D 0KIDFff FRPSOH[ ZLOO EH PRUH GHORFDOL]HG DQG FRQWDLQ PRUH OLJDQG FKDUDFWHU WKDQ WKH FRUUHVSRQGLQJ +202 RI D 0DFDFfn FRPSOH[ 7KH ORZHU HHf UHSXOVLRQ LQ WKH 0KIDFf FRPSOH[HV FDXVHV WKH VPDOOHU FKDQJH LQ PHWDOOLJDQG ERQG HQHUJLHV DQG WKH JUHDWHU HOHFWURQ DWWDFKPHQW HQHUJLHV &RUUHODWLQJ WUHQGV LQ (r IRU 0 +-'f DTf FRXSOHV DQG $+DrU0rTf ,W LV LQWHUHVWLQJ WR FRPSDUH WKH DERYH WUHDWPHQW IRU WKH JDVSKDVH HOHFWURQ DWWDFKPHQW HQHUJLHV IRU WKH 0DFDFf FRPSOH[HV WR WKDW XVHG E\ SUHYLRXV ZRUNHUV WR FRUUHODWH WKH WUHQG LQ WKH YDOXHV RI WKH VWDQGDUG UHGXFWLRQ SRWHQWLDOV IRU 0+4f DTf FRXSOHV WR WKH WUHQG LQ $+Dr>0Jf @ YDOXHV 6WDUWLQJ ZLWK HTXDWLRQ IRU 0/0+fDTf @ $/)6( $+ r>0Jf @ $$+ $$+VROYr>0+rf@ 7$6 KHW > 0 +f @ D >0+fDTf @ f 9DOXHV RI 'T DUH DYDLODEOH LQ WKH OLWHUDWXUH IRU 0+'f DQG 0+'f LRQV IURP VSHFWURVFRSLF VWXGLHV DQG $/)6( LV UHDGLO\ HYDOXDWHG ,Q FKDSWHU WKH UHODWLRQVKLS EHWZHHQ $*Dr>0/\QVROQf@ DQG (r IRU WKH 0/\QQf VROQf UHGR[ FRXSOH ZDV VKRZQ WR EH $*Dr>0/\Q VROQf @ )(r>0/\Q&QnfVROQf @ (DEVr6+(f @ ZKHUH (DEVr6+(f LV WKH DEVROXWH SRWHQWLDO RI WKH VWDQGDUG K\GURJHQ HOHFWURGH DQG ) LV WKH )DUDGD\
PAGE 134
FRQVWDQW 8VLQJ WKLV UHODWLRQVKLS HTXDWLRQ FDQ EH ZULWWHQ LQ WHUPV RI WKH VWDQGDUG UHGXFWLRQ SRWHQWLDO RI WKH 0+f UHGR[ FRXSOH HT )(r $/)6( $+Dr>0Jf@ $$+KHWr>0+f@ $$+VROYr>0+J2f@ 7$6Dr>0+ f DTf@f (DEVr6+(f 7KH WHUPV $$+KHWr>0+ f @ $$+VROYr>0+ f @ RQ WKH ULJKWKDQG VLGH RI HT FRUUHVSRQG WR WKH GLIIHUHQFH LQ HQWKDOS\ VHSDUDWHG E\ WKH WZR GDVKHG OLQHV GUDZQ WKURXJK WKH VHULHV RI $+K\Gr>0Jf @ DQG $+K\Gr>0Jf @ YDOXHV LQ )LJXUH ZKLFK LV D JHQHUDOO\ VPRRWK WUHQG 7KH WHUP $6Dr>0+fDTf @ FRQWDLQV WKH LQWUDPROHFXODU HQWURS\ FKDQJH GLVFXVVHG LQ FKDSWHU ZKLFK LV H[SHFWHG WR EH VLPLODU LQ PDJQLWXGH WR WKH YDOXHV RI $6Dr>0DFDFfJf@ DQG WKHUHIRUH VPDOO DQG WKH HQWURS\ FKDQJH UHVXOWLQJ IURP WKH GLIIHUHQFH LQ SRODUL]DWLRQ RI WKH VROYHQW 7KH ODWWHU FRQWULEXWLRQ LV D IXQFWLRQ RI WKH FKDUJH DQG UDGLXV RI WKH LRQV LQYROYHG LQ WKH FRXSOH DQG LV SUHGLFWHG E\ WKH %RUQ HTXDWLRQ HTV DQG f WR YDU\ VPRRWKO\ 7KH UHPDLQLQJ WHUP LV WKH FRQVWDQW (rDEV6+(f DQG WKHUHIRUH DOO WHUPV H[FHSW $+ U Z >0 Jf@ RQ WKH ULJKWKDQG VLGH RI HT YDU\ LQ D VPRRWK SHULRGLF PDQQHU 7KH VXP RI WKH WHUPV RQ WKH ULJKWKDQG VLGH RI HT VKRXOG WKHUHIRUH UHIOHFW WKH VDPH R U Z SHULRGLF WUHQG DV $+ Jf @ 7KH GHYLDWLRQV LQ WKH SHULRGLF WUHQG OLQHV EHWZHHQ WKH YDOXHV RI (r IRU WKH 0+f FRXSOHV DQG $+r>0Jf@ FDQ WKHUHIRUH EH DWWULEXWHG WR $/)6( DV ZDV VKRZQ DERYH IRU WKH WUHQG LQ $*Dr>0DFDFfJf @ YDOXHV &RQFOXVLRQV 7KH FKDQJH LQ WUHQGV LQ HOHFWURQ DWWDFKPHQW HQHUJLHV IRU FRPSOH[HV LQ FRPSDULVRQ WR WKH FRUUHVSRQGLQJ IUHH LRQV FDQ EH TXDOLWDWLYHO\ H[SODLQHG WKURXJK FRQVLGHUDWLRQ RI WKH HIIHFWV RI OLJDQG ILHOG VSOLWWLQJ RI WKH SULPDULO\ YDOHQFH G RUELWDOV ,Q SDUWLFXODU WKH PXFK UHGXFHG
PAGE 135
UDQJH RI YDOXHV IRU $*Dr IRU 0 7L&R a H9f LQ FRPSDULVRQ WR WKH IUHH LRQV a H9f UHVXOWV IURP SUHIHUHQWLDO VWDELOL]DWLRQ RI WKH UHGXFHG IRUPV RI WKH 0DFDFf FRPSOH[HV IRU 0 &U 0Q DQG &R UHODWLYH WR WKH 0DFDFf 7KH PDJQLWXGHV RI WKH $*Dr YDOXHV IRU WKH 0KIDFf FRPSOH[HV DUH a NFDO PROn KLJKHU WKDQ WKRVH IRU WKH FRUUHVSRQGLQJ 0DFDFf FRPSOH[HV DQG WKLV FDQ EH FRQVLGHUHG D UHVXOW RI D VPDOOHU FKDQJH LQ KHWHURO\WLF ERQG HQHUJ\ DVVRFLDWHG ZLWK WKH UHGXFWLRQ RI WKH 0KIDFf FRPSOH[HV
PAGE 136
5()(5(1&(6 f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f &KULVWRGRXOLGHV $ $ 0F&RUNOH / &KULVWRSKHURX / (OHFWURQ0ROHFXOH ,QWHUDFWLRQV DQG 7KHLU $SSOLFDWLRQV &KULVWRSKHURX / (G $FDGHPLF 1HZ
PAGE 137
f )UHLVHU % 6 $QDO &KLP $FWD f f -DFREVRQ % )UHLVHU % 6 $P &KHP 6RF f f 6TXLUHV 5 5 &KHP 5HY f f 6DOODQV / /DQH 6TXLUHV 55 )UHLVHU % 6 $P &KHP 6RF f f +DOO / ) +RXULHW 5 .DSSHV 0 6WDOH\ 5 + %HDXFKDPS / $P &KHP 6RF f f 0DQGLFK 0 / +DOOH / ) %HDXFKDPS / $P &KHP 6RF f f $OOLVRQ 5LGJH 3 $P &KHP 6RF f f $OOLVRQ /RPEDUVNL 0 ,QW 0DVV 6SHFWURP ,RQ 3URF f f f $ULVWRY 1 $UPHQWURXW / $QDO &KHP f $P &KHP 6RF f f :HLO $ :LONLQV & / $P &KHP 6RF f f 7HZV ( & )UHLVHU % 6 $P &KHP 6RF f f $OOLVRQ 3URJ ,QRUT &KHP f f f f 6 7DODQWD f %XFNLQJKDP $ &KHODWHV 'Z\HU ) f 6DUJHVRQ $ 0 ,Q &KHODWLQJ $JHQWV DQG 0HWDO 3 0HOORU 3 (GV $FDGHPLF 1HZ
PAGE 138
f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f 7KRPDV % 0RUULV 0 / +LOGHUEUDQGW 5 / ,QRUT &KHP f 3IOHXJHU & ( +DUDGHP 3 6 ,QRUT &KLP $FWD f 6LHYHUV 5 ( 0RVKLHU 5 : ,QRUT &KHP f .XWDO & 6LHYHUV 5 ( ,QRUT &KHP f )RUWPDQ 6LHYHUV 5 ( &RRUG &KHP 5HY f 6HUSRQH 1 %LFNOH\ 3URJ ,QRUT &KHP f +XWFKLVRQ 5 *RUGRQ +ROP 5 + ,QRUT &KHP f 0RUJDQ 7 0RVV + : &KHP 6RF f %HUJ ( 7UXHPSHU 3KYV &KHP f (YDQV 6 +DPQHWW $ 2UFKDUG $ ) /OR\G 5 'LVFXVV )DUDGD\ 6RF f (YDQV 6 +DPQHW $ 2UFKDUG $ ) &ARUG &KHP f 5LFKHVRQ 6 7RQJH / 0 =KDR 0DUNV 7 :HVVHOV % : .DQQHZXUI f =KDQJ 0DUF\ + 2 & 5 $SSO 3KYV /HWW =KDQJ .ZDN $SSO 3KYV /HWW % 6 f :ULJKW $ & (UELO $ =KDR :HVVHOV 'DKPHQ + 0DUF\ + 2 7RQJH / 0 % : .DQQHZXUI & 5 $SSO 3KYV /HWW 0DUNV 7 f 'LFNLQVRQ 3 + *HEDOOH 7 + $SSO 3KYV f 3DQVRQ 0DFKLNR $ &KDUOHV 5 %UDJLQVNL $ 6FKPLGW 1 6]HGRQ 5 $SSO 3KYV /HWW f %DQFURIW 0 5HLFKHUW f 0DFGRQDOG & 6KDQQRQ 3LHUFH / %XVFK / f 6FKLOGFURXW 6 0 3KYV 5HLFKHUW & %DQFURIW f 'DNWHUQLHNV 5 )UDVHU 2UT 0DVV 6SHFWURP f *DUQHWW / *UHJRU f & :HVWPRUH % ,QRUT &KHP 6 $XVW &KHP f &RRNV :DOWRQ ,QRUT &KHP &KHP f 0 :HVWPRUH &DQ &KHP : *DUQHWW / *UHJRU . *XLOKDXV 0 2UT 0DVV 6SHFWURP
PAGE 139
f 'DNWHUQLHNV 5 )UDVHU : *DUQHWW / *UHJRU 2UT 0DVV 6SHFWURP f f 'DNWHUQLHNV 5 )UDVHU : *DUQHWW / *UHJRU 2UT 0DVV 6SHFWURP f f )UDVHU : *DUQHWW / *UHJRU &KHP &RPP f f+DQG\ 5 ) /LQGYHGW 5 / ,QRUT &KHP f f (QGR $ 6KLPL]X 6DWR 3 &KHP /HWW f f (QGR $ +RVKLQR < +LUDNDWD 7DNHXFKL < 6KLPL]X )XUXVKLPD < ,NHXFKL + 6DWR 3 %XOO &KHP 6RF -SQ f f (QGR $ %XOO &KHP 6RF -SQ f B f 3DWWHUVRQ 6 +ROP 5 + ,QRUT &KHP f f Df &RPLVDURZ 0 % 0DUVKDOO $ f Ef &RPLVDURZ 0 &KHP 3KYV /HWW f 0DUVKDOO $ &DQ &KHP f 3KYV /HWW &KHP % 0DUVKDOO $ Ff &RPLVDURZ 0 )RU D UHFHQW UHYLHZ RI WKH WHFKQLTXH VHH Df %XFKDQDQ 0 9 &RPLVDURZ 0 % ,Q )RXULHU 7UDQVIRUP 0DVV 6SHFWURPHWU\ %XFKDQDQ 0 9 (G $&6 6\PSRVLXP 6HULHV f Ef (\OHU + %D\NXW 7UHQGV LQ $QDO\WLFDO &KHPLVWU\ f Ff 0DUVKDOO $ $FF &KHP 5HV f ,4 f &RPLVDURZ 0 ,QW 0DVV 6SHFWURP ,RQ 3URFHVVHV f f f &RPLVDURZ &RPLVDURZ f &KHP 3KYV f *UDVVL 9 3DULVRG &KHP 3KYV /HWW f (QGR $ 6KLPL]X 6DWR 3 0XNDLGD 0 &KHP /HWW f f 5\DQ 0 ) 0DVWHUV 'LVVHUWDWLRQ 8QLYHUVLW\ RI )ORULGD f f &HOORWD 5 %HQQHWW 5$ +DOO / &KHP 3KYV f f 1LPLRV 0 5 (OOLVRQ % 3KYV &KHP f f 6KDUSH 3 5LFKDUGVRQ ( &RRUG &KHP 5HY f B f 0H 'HUPLG 6 :HEVWHU & 5 'H 3K\VLTXH f & f 3UHVFRWW 6 5 &DPSDQD ( 5LVE\ 7 + $QDO &KHP f f .XJH < +DWWRUL < $VDGD 6
PAGE 140
f Df :DJPDQ ' (YDQV : + 3DUNHU 9 % +DORZ %DLOH\ 6 0 6FKXXP 5 + 6HOHFWHG 9DOXHV RI &KHPLFDO 7KHUPRG\QDPLF 3URSHUWLHV 1%6 7HFKQLFDO 1RWH f Ef -$1$) 7KHUPRFKHPLFDO 7DEOHV 1DW 6WDQG 5HI 'DWD 6HU %XU 6WDQG 86f f  Ff 5RVHQVWRFN + 0 'UD[O 6WHLQHU % : +HUURQ 7 3KYV &KHP 5HI 'DWD 6XSSOHPHQW f Gf )UDQNOLQ / 'LOODUG 5RVHQVWRFN + 0 +HUURQ 7 'UD[O )LHOG ) + 1DW 6WDQG 5HI 'DWD 1DW %XU 6WDQG 86f f B Hf *DV3KDVH ,RQ DQG 1HXWUDO 7KHUPRFKHPLVWU\ /LDV 6 %DUWPHVV ( /LHEPDQ ) +ROPHV / /HYLQ 5 0DOODUG : (GV $PHULFDQ ,QVWLWXWH RI 3K\VLFV 1HZ
PAGE 141
f .HWFODDU $ $ 9DQ 2RVWHUKRRW : 5HF 7UDY &KLP 3DYV%DV f f %DUQHW 7 &UDYHQ % 0 )UHHPDQ + & ,EHUV $ &KHP &RPPXQ f f 6W\QHV + & ,EHUV $ ,QRUT &KHP f B f f f f f .LPH 1 ( ,EHUV URZQ f O RVZRUWK 0H 'XJOH &ODUN 5 $$FWD &U\VWDOORTU 6HFW % f : .HQW / $P &KHP 6RF + &KHP 6RF 'DOWRQ 7UDQV f &UHLJKWRQ $ 6LQFODLU 7 6SHFWURFKLP $FWD f $ 1DNDJDZD 6KLPDQRXFKL 7 6SHFWURFKLP $FWD f f 6FKPLGW + 0XOOHU $ ,QRUT &KHP f f 1DNDPRWR ,QIUDUHG DQG 5DPDQ 6SHFWUD RI ,QRUJDQLF DQG &RRUGLQDWLRQ &RPSRXQGV :LOH\ 1HZ
PAGE 142
f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f 6DLWR < 7DDNHPRWR +XWFKLQVRQ % 1DNDPRWR ,QRUT &KHP f +XWFKLQVRQ % 7DNHPRWR 1DNDPRWR $P &KHP 6RF f Df :HVWPRUH % &KHP 5HY Ef & 6WUXFW %RQGLQJ *UHHQ (YDQV 6 *UHHQ 0 / + -HZLWW % .LQJ + 2UFKDUG $ ) &KHP 6RF )DUDGD\ 7UDQV f &f 5LFKDUGVRQ ( &KULVW & 6 6KDUSH 3 5\DQ 0 ) (\OHU 5 $&6 6\PSRVLXP 6HULHV %RQG (QHUJHWLFV LQ 2UJDQRPHWDOOLF &RPRXQQGV 7 0DUNV (G f 0HRW1HU 0DXWQHUf 0 $P &KHP 6RF f %DU 5 +HLQLV 7 1DJHU & -XQJHQ 0 &KHP 3K\V /HWW f 5LFKDUGVRQ ( &KULVW & 6 6KDUSH 3 (\OHU 5 $P &KHP 6RF f 0RRUH & ( 1DWLRQDO 6WDQGDUG 5HIHUHQFH 'DWD 6HULHV 86*RYHUQPHQW 3ULQWLQJ 2IILFH :DVKLQJWRQ '& f +RWRS + /LQHEHUJHU : & 3K\V &KHP 5HI 'DWD f :RRG / DQG -RQHV 0 0 ,QRUT &KHP f Df +LOO 2 DQG ,UYLQJ 5 &KHP 6RF $f f Ef +LOO 2 DQG ,UYLQJ 5 &KHP 6RF $f f Ff +LOO 2 DQG ,UYLQJ 5 &KHP 6RF $f f Df 5LEHLUR 'D 6LOYD 0 $ 9 DQG )HUUDR 0 / & & + &DQ &KHP f Ef 5LEHLUR 'D 6LOYD 0 $ 9 DQG )HUUDR 0 / & & + &KHP 7KHUPRG\QDPLFV f Ff 5LEHLUR 'D 6LOYD0 $ 9 DQG )HUUDR 0 / & & + &KHP 7KHUPRG\QDPLFV f 5LEHLUR 'D 6LOYD 0 $ 9 DQG )HUUDR 0 / & & + 0DJDOKDHV $ 0 / 7KHUPRFKLP $FWD f f 5LEHLUR 'D 6LOYD 0 $ 9 ,Q 7KHUPRFKHPLVWU\ DQG ,WV $SSOLFDWLRQV WR &KHPLFDO DQG %LRFKHPLFDO 6\VWHPV 5LEHLUR 'D 6LOYD 0 $ 9 (G 1$72 $6, VHULHV 5HLGHO 'RUGUHFW f &DYHO 3LOFKHU &KHP 6RF )DUDGD\ 7UDQV f 0XUUD\ 3 +LOO 2 7KHUPRFKLP $FWD f f f &XPPLQJ % DQG .HEDUOH 3 &DQ &KHP f
PAGE 143
f 0F&OXUH 6 ,Q 6RPH $VSHFWV RI &U\VWDO )LHOG 7KHRU\ 'XQQ 7 0 0F&OXUH 7 0 3HDUVRQ 5 (GV +DUSHU DQG 5RZ 1HZ
PAGE 144
f /LQGYHGW 5 / .HUQLWVN\ / ,QRUT &KHP f f 5LFKDUGVRQ 6KDUSH ,QRUT FKHP LQ SUHVV f 7DQDEH < 6XJDQR 6 3K\V 6RF -DSDQ f
PAGE 145
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
PAGE 146
, FHUWLI\ WKDW KDYH UHDG WKLV VWXG\ DQG LQ P\ RSLQLRQ LW FRQIRUPV WR DFFHSWDEOH VWDQGDUGV RI VFKRODUO\ SUHVHQWDWLRQ DQG LV IXOO\ DGHTXDWH LQ VFRSH DQG TXDOLW\ DV D GLVVHUWDWLRQ IRU WKH 'RFWRU RI 3KLORVRSK\ 'DYLG ( 5LFKDUGVRQ $VVRFLDWH 3URIHVVRU RI &KHPLVWU\ FHUWLI\ WKDW KDYH UHDG WKLV VWXG\ DQG LQ P\ RSLQLRQ LW FRQIRUPV WR DFFHSWDEOH VWDQGDUGV RI VFKRODUO\ SUHVHQWDWLRQ DQG LV IXOO\ DGHTXDWH LQ VFRSH DQG TXDOLW\ DV D GLVVHUWDWLRQ IRU WKH 'RFWRU RI 3KLORVRSK\ 5 (\OHU IHVVRU RI &KHPLVWU\ FHUWLI\ WKDW KDYH UHDG WKLV VWXG\ DQG LQ P\ RSLQLRQ LW FRQIRUPV WR DFFHSWDEOH VWDQGDUGV RI VFKRODUO\ SUHVHQWDWLRQ DQG LV IXOO\ DGHTXDWH LQ VFRSH DQG TXDOLW\ DV D GLVVHUWDWLRQ IRU WKH 'RFWRU RI 3KLORVRSK\ 5XVVHOO 6 'UDJR *UDGXDWH 5HVHDUFK 3URIHVVRU RI &KHPLVWU\
PAGE 147
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
PAGE 148
81,9(56,7< 2) )/25,'$
THERMODYNAMIC ASPECTS OF GAS-PHASE ELECTRON ATTACHMENT
TO TRANSITION METAL TRIS(BETA-DIKETONATE) COMPLEXES
By
PAUL SHARPE
*â– * tm>
A DISSERTATION PRESENTED TO THE GRADUATE SCHOOL
OF THE UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA IN PARTIAL
FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS
FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY
UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA
1990
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
First I must thank my research director Dr. David E. Richardson
for his understanding, guidance and support throughout my graduate
career. Dr. John R. Eyler and Dr. Cliff Watson also deserve
considerable recognition for their many contributions and useful
discussions, especially on help with the instrumentation.
No dissertation would be complete without acknowledging all the
friends and loved-ones for their support. Foremost in my mind in this
regard is Stephanie Weinstock, whose love and understanding have been a
constant source of encouragement over the last two years. Also, I would
like to thank my mother, and my late father whom I know would have been
proud.
Finally, I will always remember my colleagues in Graduate School
at the University of Florida especially Matt, Casey, Mike and T.M. who
greatly enhanced the enjoyment of graduate school at Florida.
ii
TABLE OF CONTENTS
page
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS ii
ABSTRACT v
CHAPTERS
1 INTRODUCTION 1
Overview of Research 1
Introduction to Metal B-Diketonate Complexes 8
Properties and Applications of Metal B-Diketonates 12
Description of the FTICR Technique 18
2 EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES AND RESULTS 23
Preparation of Tris(hexafluoroacetylacetonate)
Complexes 23
Preparation of Tris (acetylacetonate) Complexes 25
Preparation of Ruthenium Tris(B-Diketonates) 25
Organic Compounds 26
Electron Attachment Studies 26
Gas-Phase Spectrophotometry of Cr(hfac)3 37
3 TERMINOLOGY AND CONVENTIONS USED IN GAS-PHASE
ION THERMOCHEMISTRY 38
Introduction 38
Electron Affinities and Adiabatic Ionization
Potentials 39
Stationary and Thermal Electron Conventions 40
4 INTRAMOLECULAR ENTROPY CHANGES FOR REDOX COUPLES
INVOLVING COMPLEX METAL IONS 48
Introduction 48
Statistical Mechanics Applied to the Determination
of Gas-Phase Intramolecular Entropy Changes for
Redox Couples Involving Complex Metal Ions 51
Comparison of Solution-Phase and Gas-Phase Entropy
Changes for Some Redox Couples Involving Octahedral
Metal Complexes 72
The Relationship Between The Free Energy and Enthalpy
of Gas-Phase Electron Attachment to M(acac)3 and
M(hfac)3 Complexes 80
Conclusions 82
iii
5 METAL-LIGAND BOND ENERGIES AND SOLVATION ENERGIES FOR
GAS-PHASE TRANSITION METAL TRIS(ACETYLACETONATE)
COMPLEXES AND THEIR ANIONS 84
Introduction 84
Electron Attachment Energy Relationships 85
Homolytic and Heterolytic M-O Bond Enthalpies in
M(acac),(g) Complexes and M(acac)3'(g) Ions 90
Relative Solvation Energies of M(acac)3(g)
and M(acac)3'(g) 99
Relative Solvation Energies of Ru(tfac)3(g) and
Ru(hfac)3 and Their Negative Ions 108
Conclusions Ill
6 INTERPRETATION OF THE TRENDS ON THE ELECTRON ATTACHMENT
FREE ENERGIES OF THE TRIS(ACETYLACETONATE) AND
TRIS(HEXAFLUOROACETYLACETONATE) COMPLEXES OF THE
METALS Ti-Co USING THE SIMPLE LIGAND FIELD MODEL 113
Introduction 113
Thermochemical Relationships and Periodic Trends 114
Conclusions 128
REFERENCES 130
BIOGRAPHICAL SKETCH 139
iv
Abstract of Dissertation Presented to the Graduate School
of the University of Florida in Partial Fulfillment of the
Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy
THERMODYNAMIC ASPECTS OF GAS-PHASE ELECTRON ATTACHMENT
TO TRANSITION METAL TRIS(BETA-DIKETONATE) COMPLEXES
By
Paul Sharpe
August 1990
Chairman: David E. Richardson, Ph.D.
Major Department: Chemistry
Estimations of the free energies of gas-phase electron attachment
to several transition metal tris(B-diketonate) complexes at 350 K are
reported. The compounds studied are the tris(acetylacetonate) complexes
(M(acac)3) and the tris(hexafluoroacetylacetonate) complexes (M(hfac)3)
of the series of first row transition metals M = Ga - Co. In addition,
data for the ruthenium complexes Ru(acac)3, Ru(tfac)3 and Ru(hfac)3 are
reported, where tfac is trifluoroacetylacetonate. This work represents
the first reliable estimations of thermal gas-phase electron attachment
energies for a class of coordination compounds.
Electron attachment free energies for the complexes were obtained
by using Fourier transform ion cyclotron resonance mass spectrometry
(FTICR) to monitor charge-transfer bracketing and equilibrium reactions
involving parent negative ions trapped in a mixture of two gases. The
gas mixture consisted of a metal complex and an organic reference
compound, for which the electron attachment free energy is established.
Theoretical intramolecular entropy changes for some redox couples
involving coordination complex ions are estimated and compared, where
possible, to experimental solution-phase results in order to gain an
appreciation of the entropy change and enthalpy change for gas-phase
electron attachment to the coordination compounds in the present study.
v
The electron attachment energy data are combined with other
thermochemical data in energy cycles that lead to estimations of the
changes in heterolytic M-O bond enthalpies and solvation free energies.
The observation of charge-transfer bracketing reactions involving
acetylacetonate anions led to the determination of the heterolytic and
homolytic M-O bond enthalpies for M(acac)3 neutrals and their anions.
Published estimations of the absolute potential of the standard hydrogen
electrode led to estimations of the free energy for solution-phase
electron attachment to the complexes in several solvents. For
Ru(acac)3, the single ion solvation free energy is estimated, and the
result is discussed in comparison to a similar estimation based on a
dielectric continuum theoretical model.
The results of this investigation serve to illustrate the relative
importance of changes in bond energies and solvation energies that
determine the magnitude of redox couples involving reduction of tris(13-
diketonate) complexes.
vi
CHAPTER 1
INTRODUCTION
Overview of Research
Many methods have been used for the determination of gas-phase
electron attachment energies of atoms and molecules. These methods can
be categorized into theoretical, semiempirical and experimental, and
these various approaches have been reviewed.1 Although some of the
published data on gas-phase electron attachment energies has been
determined from solution-phase studies such as polarography and reaction
calorimetry, the majority of the published work to date stems from the
experimental methods that study gas-phase negative ions directly. These
methods were actively developed during the early 1970s. Gas-phase
methods rely on a ready source of ions, which is by far most easily
accomplished by the ionization of a gas. Hence, the majority of
determinations have been performed on ions formed from volatile
precursors. In the case of metal-containing compounds, studies of
negative ions have been restricted to those formed from metal halides,
especially hexafluorides, oxyhalides, and carbonyls.2 These compounds
are all gases or volatile liquids or solids. In particular, transition
metal hexafluorides have received a great deal of attention. It has
long been known that these compounds are the most highly oxidizing
compounds known, typically having electron affinities in the range of
“ 3 eV to 10 eV.
The majority of experimental methods involving gas-phase negative
ions that have been used to determine the electron attachment energies
of metal complexes can be classified as threshold methods. In threshold
methods electron attachment energies are inferred from the minimum
1
2
energy of an impinging particle that causes the formation or breakdown
of a negative ion. In the atom impact method, beams of energy selected
neutral alkali atoms are collided with a neutral target gas. The
translational energy dependence of the alkali atom beam is monitored as
a function of the relative cross section for the formation of the parent
anion of the target molecules. Using this method, Compton and co¬
workers have provided estimates for the electron affinities of MoF6,
ReF6, UF6, UF5, SeF6, TeF6 and WF6.3,4 A related method involves
colliding negative ions into a target gas. The translational energy of
the negative ions is varied and the threshold energy for the onset of an
endothermic electron-transfer reaction is detected by the observation of
the formation of product ions. The ion-molecule reaction may be simple
charge-transfer or may be accompanied by atom transfer, such as proton
transfer. The enthalpy of formation of the anion of interest can be
determined from the enthalpies of formation of all other species
involved in the reaction, combined with the threshold value of the
translational energy of the negative ion beam. Although the energy of
the atomic and negative ion beams in these methods can be controlled to
within a range of energy of ± 0.1 eV, there are several problems
encountered in obtaining acurate electron attachment energies. Most
prominent are the sensitivity of the threshold energy to the thermal
distribution of the translational energies of the target gas, the
weakness of the signal around the threshold energy and the lack of
information on the initial and final states of the neutral molecules and
product ions. Due to the inherent problems these methods have produced
results for electron affinity values for transition metal hexafluorides
that are in considerable disagreement. For example, the range of
electron affinity values reported for tungsten hexafluoride extends from
2.75 - 5.5 eV.5'6
More accurate determinations are possible with photodetachment and
photoelectron spectroscopy methods. Both of these methods are based on
3
the detachment of an electron from a negative ion, according to eq 1-1,
by using photons of known energy generated by a laser, or light source
with monochromator.
AB' + hv = AB + e' 1-1
Photodetachment methods use a variable frequency laser to detach the
electron from the negative ion AB’. The threshold energy can be
obtained by using a variety of physical methods that detect either the
detached electrons or the formation of neutral molecules from the anions
as a function of photon flux and wavelength. The interaction of the
negative ions with the photon flux has been accomplished in crossed
photon-molecular beam experiments, drift tubes and in ion traps.7
In photoelectron spectroscopy,1 the frequency of the photon source
is fixed and the energy spectrum of the emitted electrons is recorded.
For simple molecular anions, composed of a few atoms, the energy
spectrum can be resolved into the vibrational transitions accompanying
the detachment process. Determining the energy of the ejected electrons
from the ground vibrational states of the neutral and the anion leads to
very accurate determinations of the electron affinity of molecules.
Using the photoelectron spectroscopy method, Lineberger and co-workers
have determined the electron affinities of several carbonyl complexes of
Fe and Ni, which are in the range of 0.6 - 2.4 eV.8,9 A limitation of
extending the technique to high electron affinity compounds such as
volatile metal hexafluorides is that although it may be possible to
identify the energy transitions in the spectra, producing a light source
of the required wavelength and flux is impractical for compounds of such
high electron affinities.
The picture that emerges is that due to the volatility and/or high
electron affinity restrictions imposed by metal containing compounds,
few reliable data are currently available.
4
Since about 1982, techniques in mass spectrometry that are capable
of following the time dependence of ion-molecule reactions have been
used to determine the electron attachment energies of polyatomic
molecules. In these methods the equilibrium constant for a gas-phase
charge-transfer reaction involving two neutral reactants and their
parent negative ions is measured. These methods have therefore been
described as equilibrium methods. The techniques in mass spectrometry
that have been used for this purpose are pulsed high pressure mass
spectrometry (PHPMS)10-15 and ion cyclotron resonance mass spectrometry
(ICR).16-19 Electron attachment energies for many different organic
compounds have been reported, and values are in the range of 0.5 - 3.2
eV. The types of new compounds studied is still expanding and many more
determinations are reported each year. One of the advantages of the
equilibrium method over threshold methods for determining electron
attachment energies is that the moleular ions formed after ionization
are cooled to the same temperature as the neutral molecules from which
they are formed, usually by a thermalizing bath gas. Electron
attachment energies are therefore obtained at a definite temperature and
may be combined with other thermochemical data, especially electron
attachment energies in condensed-phases. For example, many of the
organic compounds studied exhibit reversible electrochemical behavior
and this has led to estimates of the change in solvation energy for
solution phase reduction of these compounds.14,15,20
A relatively recent technique in mass spectrometry that is also
capable of monitoring the time dependence of ion-molecule reactions is
the versatile and powerful Fourier transform ion cyclotron resonance
mass spectrometry (FTICR). An important difference between FTICR and
other techniques in mass spectrometry is that only very low operating
pressures of reactants are required. This feature makes FTICR
particularly suitable for the study of low-volatility compounds. Hence,
FTICR has been exploited in the study of gas-phase ion-molecule
5
reactions of metal containing compounds.21'43 Much of the published
research considers ion-molecule processes involving metal containing
ions (mostly derived from organometallic precursors) or bare metal ions
pi _
(produced by techniques such as laser vaporization of metal targets).
34 The bulk of this work has centered on the reactions of bare metal
ions or highly coordinatively unsaturated metal ions with C-H and C-C
bonds.21'34 Relatively little attention has been given, however, to
coordinatively saturated metal complexes with non-carbon donor ligands,
such as coordination complexes.
There were two principal objectives of the present work. The
first was to determine the free energies of thermal electron attachment
for a series of coordination complexes by using the FTICR technique,
thereby extending the established charge-transfer equilibrium method for
the determination of free energies of electron attachment to
coordination complexes. The compounds studied in the present work were
the tris(acetylacetonate) (M(acac)3) and tris(hexafluoroacetylacetonate)
(M(hfac)3) complexes of the series of metals M = Sc - Co and Ga. The
complexes Ru(acac)3, Ru(hfac)3 and Ru(tfac)3 were also included (where
tfac = trifluoroacetylacetonate). These complexes are pseudo-octahedral
tris chelate coordination complexes in which the ligands bind to metal
centers with oxygen atom donors. Estimates of the free energies of
electron attachment for these complexes were obtained in the present
work, and this represents the first reliable determination of the gas-
phase electron attachment energies of coordination complexes under
thermal conditions.
The second objective was to determine the changes in average
heterolytic metal-oxygen (M-O) bond energies that occur during gas-phase
electron attachment to the fi-diketonate complexes. Also, for the
complexes that exhibit reversible one-electron electrochemical reduction
in solution, determine the changes in solvation energies that contribute
to the magnitude of the reduction potential. These energies were
6
obtained by incorporating the electron attachment free energy data for
the complexes into energy cycles35 that relate the energy for this
process to the energy for electron attachment to the free metal ions and
the coordinated ions in solution. To obtain the change in average M-O
heterolytic bond enthalpies a value of the entropy change for electron
attachment to the complex is required.
Estimates of entropies could be obtained, in principle, by
determining the temperature dependence of the equilibrium constants for
the gas-phase charge transfer reactions. There is no provision on the
FTICR instrument used in this study to determine the temperature
dependence of ion-molecule reactions. Therefore, statistical mechanics
was used to attempt to provide estimates of entropy changes for gas-
phase electron attachment to coordination compounds. The results of the
calculations reported in this study have provided insights into the
magnitudes of entropy changes for electron attachment processes
involving coordination complexes, both in the gas-phase and in solution,
and have enabled estimates to be made for the change in heterolytic M-0
bond energies. Data of this type are scarce for metal complexes. The
M(H20)63+ and M(H20)62+ ions, where M are first transition series metals,
represent one of the few series of complex ions for which metal-ligand
bond energies and solvation energies are known for both ions that form
the redox couple. Generally, even less is known of the thermodynamics
of redox processes at metal centers involving negative ions. The data
obtained for the fi-diketonate complexes in the present work therefore
broaden the present understanding of the thermodynamics of redox
processes that occur at transition metal centers in different
coordination environments.
Several attempts have been made to determine the average homolytic
and heterolytic M-0 bond dissociation enthalpies in M(acac)3 complexes.
In the auxiliary thermochemical data required in the cycles used to
obtain these values, the value for the homolytic bond dissociation
7
enthalpy of the enolic O-H bond in acetylacetone introduces the greatest
uncertainty since no experimental data are available. From the results
of thermal gas-phase charge-transfer reactions involving acac’ ions,
presented in the present work, an improved estimate is made for the
enolic O-H bond enthalpy. From the original reaction calorimetry data
improved estimates are made for the average M-0 homolytic and
heterolytic bond dissociation enthalpies for M(acac)3 complexes. This
data, when combined with the gas-phase electron attachment energy data
for the M(acac)j complexes, has allowed the average heterolytic and
homolytic bond dissociation enthalpies for the corresponding gas-phase
M(acac)j' ions to be determined.
It has been shown for M(H20 ) 63+/2+ redox couples of the first
transition metal series ions that the trend in the magnitudes of the
reduction potentials for these couples can be related quite successfully
to the trend in the electron attachment energies of the free M+3 ions
(the negative value of the third ionization potential of M(g)) by
correcting the reduction potentials for the difference between the
heterolytic M-O bond enthalpies in the oxidized and reduced form of each
redox couple.35*37 Although the difference in absolute magnitudes of
electron attachment energies between M+3 ions in the gas-phase and in
solution can only be accouted for by additionally considering solvation
energies, nephelauxetic effects in the complexed ions and the absolute
potential of the electrochemical reference electrode used, the periodic
variance of the sums of these quantities is generally small enough to be
neglected when compared to the difference in heterolytic bond energies.
The trend in the difference between metal-ligand heterolytic bond
energies between the ions that form redox couples can be estimated from
the appropriate spectroscopic data, when used with the crystal field"
model. For M(H20)63+72+ ions, differences in ligand field stabilization
energies have been derived spectroscopically and have been used to
"correct" the values of the reduction potentials to generate the trend
8
line for the electron attachment energies of the free ions. In this
way, a simple explanation is provided for the trends in the reduction
potentials. The trend in the gas-phase electron attachment energies for
the M(acac)j complexes in the present work is explained by using a
similar approach to that taken for the M(H20 ) 63+/2+ couples.
Introduction to Metal B-Diketonate Complexes
The transition metal complexes investigated in the present work
belong to the general class of metal B-diketonates.38,39 There are a
great many B-diketone ligands that coordinate to metals. The general
structure of B-diketones is shown in Figure 1-1. The most common
ligands have R1 and R2 = alkyl, perfluoroalkyl and aryl groups, and R3 =
hydrogen, but several other ligands have been reported in which R3 is
also alkyl or aryl.
Rj H
\ /
C
0 0
Keto Form
R,
R3
I
c
/ 0%
R,
0
X
I
0
Enol Forms
R3
i
c
X p \
I
0
\
Figure 1-1. Structure of B-diketones in keto and enol forms.
Figure 1-1 illustrates the the keto-enol tautomerism that exists
in many B-diketones. The hydrogen atom at the B ring carbon atom is
activated by the adjacent C=0 groups and a conjugate system can arise
from the prototropic shift. These tautomers exist in equilibrium with
each other, and structurally they possess a cis configuration and a syn
9
R1
R2
R3
Ligand
Abbrev
ch3
ch3
H
Acetylacetonate
acac
CHj
cf3
H
Trifluoroacetylacetonate
tf ac
cf3
cf3
H
Hexafluoroacetylacetonate
hf ac
t-butyl
t-butyl
H
Dipivaloylmethanate
dpm
phenyl
ch3
H
Benzoylacetylacetonate
bzac
Figure 1-2.
Structure
and
nomenclature of fi-diketonate
ligands.
10
(cisoid) conformation. The proportion of the enol tautomers generally
increases when an electron withdrawing group such as a halogen atom is
present as R3. The enolization also increases when the ligands are
fluorinated or contain an aromatic ring. Substitution by a bulky group
(e.g. alkyl) at the ring a or y carbon atoms causes steric hindrance
between Rj and R1 (or R2), particularly in the enol tautomer, and this
together with the inductive effects of the alkyl groups may
significantly reduce the proportion of the enol tautomer at equilibrium.
Since complexation to a metal is believed to occur through the enol form
of the ligand, attempts to obtain metal complexes of these ligands often
result in poor yields.
The complexes investigated in the present work are tris-chelate
transition metal complexes of the ligands hfac, tfac and acac. The
structures of the coordinated ligands are given in Figure 1-2. The
structure of the complexes themselves are shown in Figure 1-3, which
shows the two optical isomers that exist in tris B-diketonate complexes.
Figure 1-3. Structure and optical isomers of tris(B-diketonate)
complexes.
11
Table 1-1. Structural Details of Metal Tris (fl-Diketonates).
Average Average
O-M-O Bite M-0 Bond
Complex
Angle
Length
V(acac)3(a)a
88.0°
1.979
V(acac)3(J3)a
87.3°
1.982
Cr(acac)3b
91.1°
1.952
Mn(acac)3c
97.2°
1.901
Fe(acac)3d
87.1°
1.992
Co(acac)3e
97.3°
1.898
Co(acac)"
(Bu4N+ salt)f
91.5°
1.981
Ru (acac )39
94.0°
2.000
Cr(hfac)3h
87.0°
1.987
Fe(hfac)3'
87.0°
1.999
aData taken from
ref. 40.
hoata taken from
ref. 41.
cData taken from
ref. 42.
dData taken from
ref. 43.
eData taken from
ref. 44.
fData taken from
ref. 45.
9Data taken from
ref. 46.
hData taken from
ref. 47.
'Data taken from
ref. 48.
12
For symmetrical ligands (R1 and R2 in Figure 1-2 are the same),
two optical isomers are possible (Figure 1-3). The d and 1 optical
isomers of Cr(hfac)3 have been isolatated by gas-chromatographic
techniques by using an optically active support.1*8 For unsymmetrical
ligands (R1 and R2 in Figure 1-2 are not the same) each optical isomer
can exist in a cis or trans conformation. It has been found by using a
gas-chromatograph equipped with an electron capture dectector that
Cr(hfac)3 undergoes dynamic cis-trans intramolecular isomerism in the
gas-phase.49 Tris(B-diketonate) transition metal complexes of
unsymmetrical ligands have received considerable attention regarding
investigations of the mechanisms that have been proposed for
intramolecular structural isomerism in tris-chelate complexes.50'52 For
several of the tris-chelate metal complexes studied in this report,
X-ray crystal structures or gas-phase electron diffraction structures
are available. The "bite" angle of the ligands and the M-O bond lengths
obtained from these investigations are presented in Table 1-1. The
"bite†angle of the oxygen donor atoms is in all cases is quite close to
90°, which gives a pseudo-octahedral arrangement about the central metal
atom of O donor atoms.
Properties and Applications of Metal B-Diketonates
In this section some background is given of the chemical and
physical properties and applications of transition metal B-diketonates.
The emphasis is on the M(acac)3, M(tfac)3 and M(hfac)3 complexes of the
first transition metal series, which are the subject of the present
study, although other complexes are included. Much of the relevant
material which should appear in this section is discussed or referenced
in later chapters and is not presented here.
13
Rather, this section deals with the more interesting and relevant
miscellaneous literature on transition metal B-diketonates that may
serve to acquaint the reader with these compounds.
The physical and chemical properties of transition metal
B-diketonates have generated a great deal of research interest since
they were first synthesized in the year 1887. The interest in these
compounds stems not only from their spectroscopic and structural
properties as coordination complexes, but also from their remarkable
physical properties. Many metal B-diketonates are volatile, which led
Morgan and Moss in the year 1914 to describe B-diketones as the ligands
that "gave wings to metalsâ€.53 The factors that determine the
volatility of metal B-diketonates have been discussed.31 Generally, for
octahedral complexes, an increasing amount of flúorination in the ligand
leads to greater volatility. Hence, for the complexes studied in the
present work, the order of increasing volatility is M(acac)3 < M(tfac)3
< M(hfac)3. The M(tfac)3 complexes are usually only marginally more
volatile than M(acac)3 due to the dipole moments present in the cis and
trans forms of M(tfac)3 complexes.
The volatility of transition metal B-diketonates has enabled them
to be studied by a variety of physical methods that are not readily
applied to ligated metal centers that exist as ions. The vapor-phase
He(I) photoelectron (PE) spectra of M(hfac)3 and M(acac)3 complexes have
been reported.54,55 The spectra were interpreted in terms of elementary
molecular orbital theory, which yielded information concerning the
details of the metal-ligand bonding, and in the case of transition metal
complexes, information about the the relative energies of the metal d
and ligand orbitals.
Some interesting and important work has recently been reported on
the use of metal B-diketonates in the field of organometallic chemical
vapor deposition (OMCVD) in the formation of thin film high temperature
superconductors.56'60 In contrast to physical vapor deposition, the
14
method does not require high vacuum and accordingly has the advantage of
relative ease for large scale application with the possibility of
coating complicated shapes. Thin films of superconducting YBa2Cu307
have been prepared by a process that involves thermal decomposition of a
flow of a vapor mixture of fi-diketonate precursors of Y, Cu and Ba in
argon. There are several complexes of yttrium and copper that are
sufficiently volatile and thermally stable to be used for this purpose.
These include Y(dpm)3 Cu(acac)2 and Cu(dpm)2. Barium complexes are less
thermally stable and decomposition has been reported under the
experimental conditions. The most success in this respect has been
obtained with Ba(fod)2, where fod = 2,2 dimethyl-6,6,7,7,8,8,8-
heptafluoro 3,5 octadionate. The B-diketonate precursors are
volatilized in seperate sources and their flow rates are carefully
controlled to give the desired stoichiometric ratio. Oxygen is added to
the gas mixture before it reaches a high temperature reactor containing
the substrate onto which the superconducting layer is to be deposited.
Water vapor has been added to the oxygen flow to aid in the decompostion
of the complexes by hydrolysis. Substrates used so far have been
SrTiOj, A1203 and yttria stabilized zircona (YSZ), and the deposited
films are usually 5-10 pm thick. After the decomposition period, a
variety of annealing processes have been used (depending on the
B-diketonate precursors used) to convert the initially deposited layer
into superconducting YBa2Cu307. By this method, films of good
compositional and dimensional uniformity are produced. A similar method
has been used to produce thin superconducting films of the Tl-Ba-Ca-Cu-O
type.57 These thin-film superconductors have critical temperatures in
the range of 90-120 K with the onset of zero resistance at 65-100 K.
The metal-ligand bond energy data of the type obtained in the present
work may be useful in these investigations.
15
The volatility of metal fi-diketonates has allowed several
investigations of their gas-phase positive and negative ions by using
mass spectrometry. Much of the work with positive ions has concerned
the determination of appearance potentials and mechanisms of
fragmentation subsequent to electron impact (El) ionization.63 Some
interesting work has been reported by Pierce and co-workers64 in an
investigation of the secondary ion mass spectrometry (SIMS) and laser
desorption (LD) of solid samples of transition metal /3-diketonates. One
of the aims of the study was to compare the ionic species formed by
conventional El ionization to to those formed from SIMS and LD. The
SIMS spectra revealed catonization of intact neutral M(acac)3 complexes
by ionic fragments produced in the plasma, as well as the ionic
fragments themselves. Ions of masses corresponding to the following
stoichiometries were observed M(acac)+, M(acac)2+, M2(acac)3+ and
M2(acac)^+. These species had also been observed in a study of M(acac)3
complexes using high pressure mass spectrometry.65 Catonization of
neutral M(acac)3 by Na+, Ag+ and NH^+ was also found to occur when the
chlorides of these cations were mixed with the solid sample of metal B-
diketonate. SIMS spectra of mixed samples of M(acac)3 complexes of two
different metals produced mixed metal clusters of the same general
formula. When certain mixtures of a metal J3-diketonate, a chloride of a
different transiton metal and a cationizing agent were vaporized, ligand
exchange was found to occur. For example, a mixture of Fe(acac)3, CrCl3
and NH^Cl produced Cr(acac)+, Cr(acac)2+, Fe(acac)+, Fe(acac)2+ and
[Fe(acac)-CH3]+. For other mixtures no ligand exchange fragments were
detected. The spectra of laser desorbed samples produced many of the
same fragment ions observed in the SIMS experiments. Interestingly,
during the course of the present work, ligand exchange has been observed
in gas-phase ion-molecule reactions involving negative ions formed from
mixtures of M(acac)3 and M(hfac)3 complexes of various metal and ligand
combinations. However, for complexes of the metals Cr and Ru, ligand
16
exchange was found not to occur. To probe the structure of the
bimetallic clusters, Pierce and co-workers used collisional dissociation
to observe the pathways for fragmentation. The resulting spectra
indicated that the cluster ions could not be considered simply as metal
cations. Rather, a stable structure involving metal atoms was invoked
with possible metal-metal bonding.
Reports on the negative ion mass spectra of metal fi-diketonate
complexes have focused largely on M(hfac)3 complexes due to their high
volatility and very large cross sections for electron capture. The
thrust of the work has been to determine the fragmentation pathways for
the parent ions following 70 eV El ionization.66'71 The possibility of
using negative ion mass spectra of some metal B-diketonates as an
analytical technique in the field of ultra trace metal analysis has been
investigated.67 Some results of previous investigations of negative
ions formed from metal fi-diketonate precursors are discussed in the
experimental section of this dissertation, in comparison to the results
obtained in this work.
A large number of metal tris(fi-diketonate) complexes exhibit
reversible electrochemical behavior, especially those containing the
metals Fe, Ru and Cr. There are numerous reports on the effect of the
ligand R substituents (Figure 1-2) on experimentally observed E1/2
values for electrochemical reduction of these complexes.72-76,159-164
substituent effects are quite pronounced. For example, the E^2 values
reported for Ru(dpm)3 and Ru(hfac)3 differ by 1.84 V in
dimethylformamide.76 For series of tris(B-diketonate) complexes of the
same metal, the trends in reduction potentials correlate predictably
with the electron releasing or withdrawing nature of the ligand ring
substituents. Thus, the order of ease of reduction for comlexes of Ru
and Cr is M(dpm)3 < M(acac)3 < M(tfac)3 < M(hfac)3. The delocalized n
system in that extends over the metal center and the ligand backbone
atoms in metal fl-diketonates has been described as possessing "quasi-
17
aromatic" character. It has been shown that there is a strong
correlation between the trends in E1/2 values for the reduction of a
series of tris(fi-diketonate) complexes of the same metal and Hammett a
parameters that have been derived from observations of the effect of
ring substituents on the thermodynamics and kinetics involving reactions
of organic aromatic compounds. Interestingly, for complexes of varying
R1 and R2 with R3 = H (Figure 1-2), there is generally a closer
correlation between E1/2 potentials and a para parameters than meta
parameters despite the meta position, with respect to the metal center,
of the carbon atom that bears the ring substituent.72 However, since
the oxygen donor atoms in the ligand are para to the substituted ring
carbon atoms, the phenomenon has been attributed to the distribution of
electron density at the oxygen atoms. From this standpoint the value of
the E^2 values can be explained in terms of ligand field theory by
considering the varying magnitude of the spherical component of the
ligand field produced by the oxygen donor atoms.
The quasi-aromatic nature of coordinated fi-diketonate ligands is
manifest by the occurence of electrophillic substitution reactions in
metal B-diketonate complexes.39 These reactions produce complexes that
are not easily formed by normal reaction routes. Substitution occurs at
the B carbon atom of the ligand (Figure 1-1) with a variety of
electrophiles. The wide variety of reactions can be classified into
halogenation, nitration, diazotization, thiocyanation, acetylation and
formylation. The reaction conditions must be chosen so that the acid
labile B-diketonate rings are not degraded. The most widely studied
complexes are therefore those of chromium(III), cobalt(III) and
ruthenium(III), which are not hydrolyzed in acid solution.
18
Description of the FTICR Technique
Production, trapping, and mass analysis of ions
In 1974 Marshall and Comisarow77 developed a method of applying
the Fourier transform technique to the analysis of the masses and
relative abundances of ions trapped in an ion cyclotron cell. The
simultaneous detection of many ions over a wide mass range circumvented
many of the limitations of the original scanning ion cyclotron resonance
mass spectrometry (ICR) technique. Since then, the Fourier transform
method, known as Fourier transform ion cyclotron resonance mass
spectrometry (FTICR), has developed into a powerful and versatile
technique in mass spectrometry.78
The FTICR technique is based on the classical motion of ions
described by elementary laws of electromagnetism. The magnetic force
(Lorentz force, F = q(VxB) ) acting on a particle of mass M, charge q,
and initial velocity V in a field of magnetic induction B causes it to
follow a helical path Figure 1-4. The constrained circular motion has a
frequency in Hz given by vc = qB/27rM. This frequency is the cyclotron
frequency and falls in the range of radio wave frequencies (0.01 - 2.00
MHz) for magnetic fields on the order of 1 tesla. To prevent ions from
travelling along the helical path and being lost, ions are produced
between two trapping plates perpendicular to the magnetic field. These
plates are maintained at a repulsive potential (typically +1 or -1 volt
for positive and negative ions, respectively), and the ions thereby are
held in a defined region between the two plates.
Excitation and detection of the trapped ions require two additional
sets of plates (transmit and receive plates) lying along the axis of the
magnetic field between the trapping plates, so the heart of the FTICR is
a box shaped cell of 6 plates. Cells are typically cubic7^ with each
plate of approx 1 square inch (Figure 1-5). The cell is mounted in a
high vacuum chamber in a strong magnetic field (the Nicolet FTICR-1000
19
Figure 1-4. Ions with initial velocity V are constrained to a helical
path along the axis of the magnetic field.
20
electron trapping
collector plate
Figure 1-5. Cubic analysis cell of the FTICR.
21
used in the present study has a 2 tesla superconducting magnet). Ions
can be formed in the cell from the low background pressure of an
admitted sample by an ionizing electron beam passing through small holes
in the trapping plates or by photoionization via irradiation through
semi-transparent grids in one or more plates. Application of an
external oscillating electric field across the transmit plates at the
characteristic cyclotron frequency of an ion causes ions of that mass in
the cell to move into resonance with the applied field and spiral out to
orbits of larger radius. The kinetic energy of the ion is given by
Ek = 27t£ Mvc‘ r , where r is the radius of the orbit. As the ions move
into resonance with the applied electric field their motion is shifted
from having a random distribution of phases to that of all
simultaneously moving in phase with the applied field as a "packet" of
ions. If the applied field is turned off or moves out of phase with the
ions, the ion packet persists long enough to induce an image current in
the detect plates80 before collisions with neutral molecules restore the
initial random distribution of phases. The induced image current at the
cyclotron frequency of the ion packet contains information in the time
domain about the frequency (mass) of the ion, and the intensity of the
signal produced is dependent on the ion population.
In order to simultaneously detect the masses and populations of
many different ions present in the cell, a fast radio frequency sweep is
applied to the transmit plates corresponding to the mass range of
interest. As each ion of a particular mass moves into resonance a
superposition of image currents is generated in the detect circuit. The
signal is amplified, digitized by an analog to digital converter and
stored in a computer. The rapid sweep/detect is repeated many times to
improve the signal-to-noise ratio by signal averaging. The computer
then performs a Fourier-transform on the stored data. This mathematical
procedure can analyze any complex time domain signal to present
graphically a plot of amplitude vs. frequency (mass), thereby producing
22
a mass spectrum. The high mass range is determined primarily by the
magnitude of the magnetic field, with increasing resolution toward lower
masses. A 3 tesla field yields good mass resolution up to approximately
3000 amu. Thus, the FTICR technique has the high resolution at large
m/z values required to study many higher molecular weight metal
complexes. The lower mass limit is governed by the maximum rate of
signal digitization. With a 5.2 MHz digitizer and a 3 tesla magnet,
this limits the detectable masses to >17 amu. A lower magnetic field
allows the detection of important lower mass ions such as OH' with an
accompanying decrease in high mass resolution.
Manipulations of ions in the trap
Between the ionization and detection events any one ionic mass can
be kinetically excited by application of a single frequency pulse via
the transmit plates. A range of masses can be excited by a frequency
sweep. Selected ions can be ejected from the cell completely if they
absorb sufficient energy to spiral out to orbits of such large radius
that they strike the cell plates (ion ejection). If a low amplitude
pulse or sweep is applied, the kinetic energy of the ions can be
increased without ejecting them from the cell.81 This technique can be
used to explore endothermic reaction channels by increasing the energy
of reactants, and this translational excitation is one way by which
structural and thermodynamic information can be obtained. An important
factor contributing to the great versatility of FTICR is that tailored
pulse sequences can be applied in almost any combination.
CHAPTER 2
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES AND RESULTS
Preparation of Trisfhexafluoroacetvlacetonate) Complexes
Scandium and gallium tristhexafluoroacetvlacetonate). To an
aqueous solution containing approximately 1 gram of scandium or gallium
chloride, an excess of ammonia solution was added, which precipitated
Sc(OH)j or Ga(OH)j respectively. The precipitate was filtered, washed
and dried and then refluxed for one hour with a 3-fold molar excess of
hexafluoroacetylacetone (20% in light petroleum ether). When cool, the
reaction mixture was filtered, and the filtrate evaporated to yield
colorless crystals (Sc(hfac)3) or pale orange crystals (Ga(hfac)3). The
crystals were sublimed at 10'3 torr and 40-50°C to effect further
purification.
Titanium and vanadium tris(hexafluoroacetvlacetonate). Both these
complexes are air sensitive and preparation was achieved by using
standard techniques involving Schlenk tubes and a Schlenk argon/vacuum
manifold. A 3-fold molar excess of hexafluoroacetylacetone (20% in
light petroleum ether) was added to approximately 1 gram of VC13 or
TiClj in a Schlenk tube against a flow of argon. The mixture was
refluxed for three hours under a blanket of argon and then allowed to
cool. The solvent containing the dissolved product was decanted from
any unreacted solids into a second Schlenk tube, which had been purged
with argon, prior to the transference by using a cannula with filter
attachment. The solvent was removed by vacuum to yield chocolate
colored crystals (V(hfac)3) or deep blue crystals (Ti(hfac)3). The
products were purified by vacuum sublimation as above.
23
24
Chromium tris(hexafluoroacetvlacetonate). This compound is
available commercially from Strem Chemicals Ltd, and was used as
received.
Manganese trisfhexafluoroacetvlacetonate). The most convenient
and simple method of preparation for this complex was found to be that
reported by Evans and co-workers.55 Approximately 1 gram of Mn203 was
added to a Schlenk tube, followed by a 3-fold molar excess of
hexafluoroacetylacetone (20% in light petroleum ether). The mixture was
refluxed for 48 hours under an argon atmosphere and then allowed to
cool. The resulting black solution was filtered and concentrated to
yield dark green crystals, which were purified by vacuum sublimation.
Only moderate yields of Mn(hfac)3 are obtained by this method, but since
it is simple and convenient, and only milligram amounts were required
for the gas-phase studies reported in this dissertation, the procedure
was adequate.
Cobalt trisfhexafluoroacetvlacetonate). The most convenient
method for the preparation of Co(hfac)3 was also found to be that
reported by Evans.56 To approximately 1 gram of cobalt trifluoride
(CoF3) in a Schlenk tube was added 1 gram of anhydrous sodium fluoride,
which in this reaction acts as a hydrogen fluoride scavenger. A 6-fold
molar excess (to the amount of CoF3) of cooled hexafluoroacetylacetone
was added slowly to the powder mixture and then the reaction mixture was
refluxed for one hour. Note that no solvent is added to the reaction
mixture. During the reflux period the solution turned deep green.
Approximately 20 cm3 of light petroleum ether was then added to the
reaction mixture, which was stirred and then filtered. The solution was
concentrated to yield dark green crystals of Co(hfac)3, which were
purified by vacuum sublimation.
25
Preparation of Tris(acetvlacetonate) Complexes
All the M(acac)3 complexes were purchased (Strem Chemicals Ltd.)
except for Ti(acac)3. The compounds were purified before use by vacuum
sublimation. The Ti(acac)3 complex, like Ti(hfac)3 is air sensitive,
and it is necessary to exclude atmospheric oxygen from the reaction
mixture during preparation by using Schlenk apparatus as was done for
V(hfac)3 and Ti(hfac)3. The complex was prepared by slowly adding a
mixture of 2 grams of acetylacetone and 2 grams of triethylamine to a
solution of approximately 1 gram of TiClj stirring in 25 cm3 of ethanol,
under an argon atmosphere. The reaction mixture becomes hot during the
addition and refluxing is not necessary. Formation of the complex is
accompanied by a dark blue coloration in the solution. After stirring
for 1 hour the solution containing the dissolved product was transferred
to a second Schlenk tube that had been purged with argon. The solvent
was removed by vacuum to yield dark blue crystals of Ti(acac)3>
Purification was effected by repeated recrystallization from degassed
ethanol/water mixtures. The product was further purified by vacuum
sublimation before use.
Preparation of Ruthenium Tris(B-diketonates)
The ruthenium B-diketonate complexes investigated in the present
work are Ru(hfac)3, Ru(tfac)3 and Ru(acac)j. The complex Ru(hfac)3 is
available from Strem Chemicals Ltd and was used as received. The other
two complexes were prepared by using the "ruthenium blue" method
reported by Endo and co-workers.82 Approximately 2 grams of hydrated
ruthenium chloride was placed in a 500 cm'3 three necked round bottom
flask purged with argon. A degassed mixture of 100 cm'3 of de-ionized
water and 150 cm'3 of ethanol was added. The mixture was refluxed on a
steam bath for approximately 2 hours under a blanket of argon. During
26
this time the initial orange color of the solution became almost black.
A 9-fold molar excess of ligand (trifluoroacetylacetone or
acetylacetone) was added to the reaction mixture which was then allowed
to continue refluxing for an additional hour, during which time the
solution became red. Next, 12 grams of potassium hydrogen carbonate
dissolved in 50 cm'3 of de-ionized water was added to the flask dropwise
over a period of 10 hours while the reaction mixture was continued to be
refluxed. The flask was cooled and the solvent was evaporated by using
a rotary evaporator. Benzene was added to the flask to dissolve the red
residue, which was then washed with three 100 cm'3 portions of 1 M
sodium hydroxide solution. The washed benzene solution was dried by
standing over anhydrous sodium sulfate. Finally, the product was
purified by loading onto a 1/2" chromatography column packed with 180
mesh alumina. The column was eluted with benzene and the resulting
solution concentrated to yield orange crystals (Ru(acac)3) or red/orange
crystals (Ru(tfac)j). No further purification of these compounds was
found to be necessary.
Organic Compounds
The organic compounds employed in the present study were purchased
from commercial sources and used without further purification. No
extraneous or fragment ions were detected in their negative ion mass
spectra.
Electron Attachment Studies
The electron transfer equilibrium method. In this section the
general method for the determination of free energies of electron
attachment of volatile polyatomic molecules by means of the charge-
transfer equilibrium method is discussed. Basically, the time
27
dependence of the populations of parent negative ions formed from a
mixture of known partial pressures of two reactants are monitored as
they charge transfer with the neutrals. For the reactions indicated in
eq 2-1, the free energy involved for electron capture by species B can
be bracketed within the lower limit of the known value for A and the
upper limit of the known value for C.
A* + B -* A + B"
B* + C -» B + C 2-1
When the free energy change is small (<3 kcal with FTICR) as in the case
of eq 2-2, the equilibrium populations of the ions can be measured.
A' + B =xn a + b" 2-2
The neutral reactants are in large excess and their partial pressures do
not vary during the reaction. The equilibrium constant for the reaction
in equation 2-2 can be obtained from the ratio of the equilibrium
population of the two ions, and the ratio of the partial pressures of
the reactant gasses. Measurement of gas pressures on the mass
spectrometer is achieved by using an ion gauge. The ion gauge was
calibrated for each reactant by using an external MKS baratron
capacitance manometer in the pressure range of ~ 10"5 torr. Special
pressure calibration procedures developed for the FTICR systems were
used that ensure uniform reactant gas pressure throughout the system by
adjusting the relative pumping rates of the two diffusion pumps
connected to the high vacuum chamber.83 The equilibrium constant Kpxn
leads to the difference in adiabatic free energy of electron attachment
for the two reactants (AG_°), by substituting K _ into eq 2-3.
AGrXn° = -RT ln(Krxn)
2-3
28
The charge-transfer equilibrium method has been used in ICR
experiments16'19 and PHPMS experiments10'15 to provide electron attachment
energies for a large number of organic compounds. For many of the
organic compounds studied, the corresponding entropy change (ASrxn°) and
enthalpy change (AHrxn°) have been obtained by following the temperature
dependence of the equilibrium.11 <12<1^»15 The results have produced
ladders of multiple overlapping values of AGrxn°, AHrxn° and ASrxn° for
pairs of organic reactants such as substituted benzophenones,19
nitrobenzenes,10,11,13,17-19 quiñones14,19 and dicarbonyls.15 The absolute
values for electron capture by each compound, (defined by AGa°, AHg° and
ASa° for the reaction A + e- = A') are obtained by including an external
standard in the ladders for which AH 0 and As ° are well established.
a a
For example the EA of SC>2 has been accurately determined to be 1.097 ±
0.036 eV84 and 1.107 ± 0.0008 eV85 in two independent investigations of
the photoelectron spectroscopy of S02‘, and S02 is the reference
compound chosen in the EA investigations of Kebarle. The value for ASg°
was evaluated by the methods of statistical mechanics from structural
and spectroscopic data.11
Electron attachment and electron transfer equilibrium studies
using the Nicolet FT/MS 1000. Gas-phase charge-transfer reactions of
the type outlined in eq 2-1 and in eq 2-2 were studied in the present
work by using a Nicolet FT/MS 1000 Fourier transform ion cyclotron
resonance mass spectrometer (FTICR). A diagram of the instrument used
is given in Figure 2-1. The technique used in the present work was
similar to that reported previously in ion cyclotron resonance mass
spectrometry (ICR) and pulsed high pressure mass spectrometry (PHPMS)
investigations. The temperature of the reaction cell was measured under
normal operating conditions to be 350 K. For the electron-transfer
reactions studied in which a charge-transfer equilibrium was observed
between an organic reference compound and a metal complex, the value of
AGa° for the complex was obtained from the value of AGrxn° given by the
29
Diffusion Pump
Inlet Diffusion Pump
Figure 2-1. Schematic diagram of the Nicolet FT/MS 1000.
30
measured equilibrium constant, and a value of AGa° for the organic
compound at the reaction temperature of 350 K (obtained for each organic
compound from the tabulated values of AHg° and Asa°). Most of the
organic compounds and the M(hfac)3 complexes were sufficiently volatile
to admit into the mass spectrometer through leak valves without heating.
Less volatile organics and the M(acac)3 complexes were sublimed off the
tip of a solids probe placed well away from the ion trap, which was at a
temperature of " 350 K. Negative ions were produced from neutrals in
the FTICR trap by capture of low energy electrons (< IV). Electron
capture by the metal complexes was, in most cases, accompanied by
varying amounts of fragmentation. Parent ions were selected from these
fragments by ion ejection techniques.
To approach collisional thermalization of ions prior to the
ion/molecule reaction, FTICR relies on a set thermalization period
between ionization and detection of product ions. Typical reaction
pressures in this study were in the 10'6 torr range, but a bath gas such
as argon or cyclohexane can be added to reactant mixtures if lower
reactant pressures are used. For both bracketing and equilibrium
experiments a thermalization period of 1 s was used. Assuming a second
order collision rate constant of 10'9 cm3 molecule’1 sec’1, at a total
pressure of 10'6 torr, each ion collides an average of about 30 times
with neutral reactant molecules before charge-transfer reactions were
followed. When a charge-transfer equilibrium was observed, the ion
populations were determined by measuring the relative abundance of the
two parent ions over suitable time intervals until they reached a
constant value. The equilibration could be followed for long reaction
times (to " 20 s) ensuring complete thermalization. At the reactant
pressures in this study equilibrium was usually established within "3
seconds, and ion loss from the cell was negligible during this time.
Ejection of each parent ion prior to equilibrium was to show that
equilibrium constants obtained do not depend on direction of approach to
31
equilibrium. The electron attachment energies for all the compounds
studied are presented in Table 2-1. The results are also presented in
Figure 2-2 to illustrate the organic reference compounds that were used
in the present work.
Table 2-1. Free Energies of Electron Attachment (kcal mol'1) at 350 K
for Mlacaclj, Mftfac^ and M(hfac), Complexes.
Sc(hfac)3 -64 ± 3C
Sc(acac)3 > 0
Ti(hfac)3 -69 ± 3C
Ti(acac)3 < 0
V(hfac)3 -73 ± 2b
V(acac)3 -24.9
Cr(hfac)3 -67 ± 3C
Cr(acac)3 -20 ±
Mn(hfac)3 (-109)a
Mn(acac)3 -59 ±
Fe(hfac)3 (-93)a
Fe(acac)3 -43.0
Co(hfac)3 (-97)a
Co(acac)3 -47 ±
Ga(hfac)3 -60.4 ± 0.5b
Ga(acac)3 > 0
Ru(hfac)3 (-89)a
Ru(acac)3 -38.7
Ru(tfac)3 -64.0b ± 0.5b
Estimated values obtained by adding 50 kcal mol"1 to corresponding
value for M(acac)3 complex (see text).
'Value obtained from measured equilibrium constant.
Reference compounds given in Figure 2-1
cValue obtained by bracketing (see eq 2-1).
32
CN
:c=c; -
CN CN
Chlorine atom 83.4
CN
j Mn(hfac)3 (109)
| Co(hfac)3 (97)
h Fe(hfac)3 (93)
j—Ru(hfac)3 (89)
73
• V(hfac)3 73-
Cl Cl
Oi/Vo-^ ,— Ru(tfac]ij 64.0 t
J. C. - - 1
°y°
F F
Cl Cl
•62.8
61.1
-Ti(hfac)3 69
-Cr(hfac)3 67
• Scfhfac^ 64
Cl
O^0=°-56.O-
CN Cl
\_Ga(hfac)3 60.1
Mn(acac),j 59
Co(acac)3 47
Fe(acac)3 43.0
Ru(acac)3 38.7
V(acac)3 24.9
Crfacac^ 20
/
Figure 2-2. Free energies of electron attachment (kcal mol'1) to
M(acac)j and M(hfac)j complexes at ~350 K and reference compounds used.
A continuous line linking an organic compound and a metal complex
indicates the value for the complex was obtained from a measured
eguilibrium constant. Arrows indicate the compounds of greater and
lower AGa° values used to bracket the value for the metal complex (eq
2-1). Values for M(hfac), with M = Mn, Co, and Fe are estimates (see
text).
33
Electron attachment energy of acac radical. The electron
attachment energy of acetylacetonate radical was determined by the
bracketing method, in which the occurrence or non-occurrence of charge
transfer reactions involving acac' ions with organic reference compounds
were observed (eq 2-1). The acac' ions were generated by heating
Co(acac)3 off the tip of a solids probe to produce a low partial
pressure (~10'7 torr) of Co(acac)3 in the FTICR main chamber.
Acetylacetonate anions were produced following electron impact
ionization of the gas. By following the time dependence of the
population of acac" ions in the presence of approximately 10‘6 torr of
each of a series of organic reference compounds, it was determined that
acac" charge-transferred to 2,6-dichlorobenzoquinone, but not
tetrafluorobenzoquinone, which sets the limits of the electron
attachment energy at 59 ± 3 kcal mol"1 (see Figure 2-2).
Consistency of Electron Attachment Energy Determinations. Although
the lower operating pressures of ICR and FTICR, compared to PHPMS,
enable low volatility compounds to be studied,86 this also introduces a
greater uncertainty in the measurement of reactant pressures. To check
the consistency of the results obtained in the present work with those
of previous determinations, AGrxn° for the reaction A = 1,4-
dicyanobenzene; B = 3-fluoronitrobenzene was measured. For this
reaction at 423 K Kebarle12 has found AG.® = -3.2 kcal mol*1 and AS 0 =
rxn rxn
2.5 cal mol"1 K"1 giving a value of AHrxn° of -2.1 kcal mol"1. In the
FTICR at 350 K we obtained AGrxn° = -2.8 kcal mol"1 which together with
the previously determined entropy change gives AHrxn° = -1.9 kcal mol"1.
The discrepancy of 0.2 kcal mol'1 probably arises from the uncertain
temperature of the neutral gas and error in measuring equilibrium
constants that are close to the limit of detection (0.01
our instrument. The value of AGrxn° for this reaction therefore
represents a value close to the upper limit of the range of values that
may be confidently measured. The discrepancy can be considered an
34
estimate of the expected error for free energies determined for
equilibrium reactions, and conservative uncertainties of 0.5 kcal mol"1
are assigned to values of AGg° determined by equilibrium to account for
experimental uncertainties, including temperature, pressure and
uncertainties in the assigned thermodynamic quantities for most of the
reference compounds.
Electron attachment to trisfhexafluoroacetvlacetonate) complexes.
The M(hfac)3 complexes studied in this investigation were those of the
first row transition metals from Sc-Co, Ga and Ru. These complexes are
particularly volatile and are easily admitted into the FTICR through
leak valves on the inlet system. It has been shown previously70,71 that
for a series of first row transition metal M(hfac)3 complexes that
fragmentation following electron capture increases from left-to-right in
the row. The same general trend was observed in the FTICR in this work.
The major pathway to fragmentation was loss of a ligand ion, and this
ion predominated in the mass spectra of the Fe and Co complexes
immediately after electron capture. A few hundred milliseconds after
the ionization, the parent ion was formed by charge transfer to the
neutral complex from the fragment ions. After a suitable period of
time, any remaining fragment ions were ejected from the cell.
By observing charge-transfer reactions involving M(hfac)3
complexes and organic reference compounds, it was found that few had
-AGg° values as high as that of the complexes. The Fe, Co and Mn
complexes had values greater than any of the organic compounds so far
reported. Although AGg° values could not be experimentally measured for
Fe(hfac)3, Co(hfac)3 and Mn(hfac)3 estimates were obtained by noting
that the order of the AGg° values runs parallel to the series of
M(acac)3 complexes. For the series of M(hfac)3 complexes, the order of
increasing values of -AGa° at 350 K was found by bracketing the
complexes against each other. Roughly equal pressures of various
combinations of two M(hfac)3 complexes were admitted into the FTICR, and
35
it was observed which of the two parent negative ions predominated after
a charge transfer period, the relative order for the series of
complexes was determined. The difference in AGa° values between
V(acac)3 and V(hfac)3 was determined to be "50 kcal mol’1 from the
results of two separate equilibrium reactions. Assuming a constant
difference of 50 kcal mol'1 between the M(acac)3 and M(hfac)3 complexes
of the other metals in the series, estimates could be made for the
M(hfac)3 complexes (M = Ru, Fe, Co, Mn) since those for the M(acac)3
complexes of the same metals were measurable. Values of AG ° obtained
in this way have been put in parentheses in Table 2-1.
The substance with the highest accurately known electron affinity
is the chlorine atom, and Cl'(g) ion was included in the study of charge
transfer reactions with the metal complexes. Electron capture by a
background pressure of Fe(hfac)3 with a small partial pressure of benzyl
chloride produced Cl"(g) in addition to the ions formed from the metal
complex. It was found that when all ions except chloride were ejected
from the cell and its subsequent reaction with Fe(hfac)3 was followed,
chloride ion regenerated Fe(hfac)3' by charge transfer, indicating that
the electron attachment energy of Fe(hfac)3 > 83.4 kcal mol’1,87 in
accord with the value estimated above.
Charge transfer occurred from tetrachlorobenzoquinone (C14BQ) to
Cr(hfac)3, but an equilibrium reaction was not observed in the reaction
with Sc(hfac)3 as the reaction was hampered by rapid formation of adduct
ions [Sc(hfac)3.Cl4BQ]', and [Sc(hfac)3]2'.
Electron attachment to tris(acetvlacetonate) complexes. M(acac)3
complexes were studied for the series of metals Sc-Co, Ga and Ru. It
has been previously noted that the cross-section for electron capture by
first row transition metal M(acac)3 complexes is much lower than for the
corresponding M(hfac)3 analogs.88 Indeed, Cr(hfac)3 was shown to have an
electron capture cross-section some 5000 times greater than CriacacJj.88
This was attributed to the six electron withdrawing CF3 ring
36
substituents in the former. The same general effect was observed in
this report for the complexes of the metals Cr to Co. The only ion
produced from ionization of the neutral gas with the electron beam was
ligand anion, but unlike the M(hfac)3 complexes, the ligand ion did not
charge transfer to the neutral complex to form the parent ion. Parent
negative ions of these complexes could only be obtained in reasonable
yields following chemical ionization by an organic compound of lower
electron attachment energy. In performing experiments with these
compounds, therefore, it was necessary to eject relatively large amounts
of ligand anion from the cell. The Ti and V complexes produced no
detectable fragment ions and had large cross sections, in accord with
the trends in stability of the ions noted above.
The difference in the electron withdrawing effect between CF3 and
CH-j in the two series of complexes was also observed to markedly reduce
the values of AGg° for the M(acac)3 series relative to the M(hfac)3
series, and the values of AGg° fall well within the range of those of
the organic compounds in the reported electron transfer free energy
ladder, which extends from approximately 10-75 kcal mol'1. This enabled
the bracketing and equilibrium reactions in eq 2-1 and eq 2-2 to be
followed for the entire series of M(acac)3 complexes. The Cr(acac)3
ion, although initially produced in the FTICR cell, was unstable and
underwent rapid loss of ligand ion at a rate that increased with the
total pressure of the system, indicating a collisionally induced
dissociation. The instability of the Cr(acac)3‘ has been observed
previously.89 Bracketing this compound through charge-transfer
reactions was therefore hampered by competitive ligand loss, producing a
greater uncertainty in the result. Parent negative ions could not be
\
made for the Sc and Ga complexes. Assuming a parallel trend between the
M(hfac)3 series and M(acac)3 series, then the Sc and Ga complexes would
be expected to have AGg values too low for formation of a stable anion,
and, experimentally no parent ions were observed.
37
A value of AGa° for the Ti(acac)3 complex could not be obtained.
In contrast to all the other complexes studied, Ti(acac)3 or its anion
did not undergo detectable electron exchange in the time scale
obtainable with the FTICR, even with relatively high pressures of
neutral gas. Exothermic charge transfer reactions involving Ti(acac)3
with various organic reactants were too slow to follow (k /k ... . <
10'4) over the range of up to 1 eV of driving force. The cause of this
unexpectedly slow gas-phase charge transfer is not known and would not
have been predicted for a d1/d2 redox process.
Charge-transfer equilibria were observed for the V and Fe
complexes, and results for Cr, Mn and Co were obtained by the bracketing
technique outlined in eq 2-1.
Gas-Phase Spectrophotometry of Cr(hfac),
The gas-phase visible spectrum of Cr(hfac)3 was determined in
order to compare the spectrum to that of Cr(hfac)3 in solution (see
chapter 6). The gas-phase spectrum was obtained by using a specially
designed sample cell with 10 cm path length and fitted with heated
quartz windows and separately heated cell body. The body was maintained
at a temperature a few degrees cooler than that of the cell windows to
ensure that crystals of Cr(hfac)3 did not form on the windows and render
them opaque. Crystals of Cr(hfac)3 were added to the cell, which was
then evacuated and positioned in the cell compartment of an IBM
UV/visible 9430 spectrophotometer. The cell was gradually heated to
about 80° C to produce a practical concentration of vapor.
CHAPTER 3
TERMINOLOGY AND CONVENTIONS USED IN GAS-PHASE ION THERMOCHEMISTRY
Introduction
Values for the energy required to remove an electron from an
isolated atom, molecule or ion are often obtained by using spectroscopic
methods that yield the minimum energy required for this process. This
energy is the adiabatic ionization potential (alP) for neutral or
positively charged species and the electron affinity (EA) for anionic
species. Mass spectrometric methods and other techniques have also been
used to estimate values for electron attachment energies and ionization
energies at T = 0 K as well for T > 0 K. In combination with other
thermochemical data, alP and EA values provide fundamental information
concerning the thermochemistry of ionic processes such as charge-
transfer reactions and ion solvation. For example, extensive
compilations of enthalpies of formation of ions at 298 K (AHf°) derived
from spectroscopic and mass spectrometric data are available.90
Tabulated values for AHf° of ions depend on the convention used to treat
the gas-phase electron.90®'91 Therefore, a convention must be used
consistently to avoid errors in derived data. One convention, the
thermal electron convention (TEC), is widely used by thermodynamicists
and treats the electron gas as a classical ideal gas. The stationary
electron convention (SEC) ("ion convention") is more commonly used by
mass spectrometrists and treats the electron as a subatomic particle.
Presented here are definitions of some important terms frequently
encountered in discussions of the energies of electron attachment or
detachment processes for gas-phase ions and neutral molecules. Also
included is a discussion of the two thermochemical conventions in common
38
39
use. The stationary electron convention is adopted throughout the
present work, and the free energies of electron attachment to the metal
complexes obtained in the present work conform to this convention.
Since a discussion of the stationary electron convention applied to free
energies of electron attachment and ionization processes has apparently
not appeared in the literature, a discussion is give here.
Electron Affinities and Adiabatic Ionization Potentials
The electron detachment process for a monoatomic or polyatomic
species Mn is shown in eq 3-1 (where n is the charge and can be zero,
positive or negative).
Mn(g) = M0*1 (g) + e' 3-1
The enthalpy change for electron detachment (AH°(Mn -» Mn+1)) can be
expressed as the sum of the enthalpy change at 0 K and the difference in
heat contents of the products and reactants at temperature T, given by
the difference in the integrated heat capacities over the range 0 K to T
(eq 3-2).
T T T
Ah °(Mn-Mn*1) - AE0_0+JcpiM"*1) dT + Jcp(e-) dT-|cp(Mn) dT 3_2
0 0 0
The term AEq.q is the energy required to form Mn+1 in its ground
electronic, rotational, and vibrational states from Mn in its ground
state. When Mn is a negative ion, AE0_0 defines the electron affinity
(EA) of Mn+1. When Mn is a neutral or positively charged species, the
energy is defined as the adiabatic ionization potential (alP). The
vertical energy for the process in eq 3-1, usually obtained from the
results of photoelectron spectroscopy, involves the formation of Mn+1
with the same geometry as that for Mn.
40
If the geometries of Mn and M^1 differ, Mn+1 will be formed in an
excited state and the energy required for the vertical processes may
be greater than for the adiabatic process.
Stationary and Thermal Electron Conventions
Usually, though not always, Mn and M0*1 in eq 3-1 are chemically
similar and the difference in their integrated heat capacities can be
neglected with respect to that of the electron. The thermal electron
convention, however treats the electron gas in eq 3-1 as an ideal gas,
which has an integrated heat capacity at constant pressure of 5RT/2,
while under the stationary electron convention the heat capacity of the
electron is set to zero. The relationship between the enthalpies of
electron detachment between the two conventions is given in eq 3-4.
AH°(TEC) - AH(SEC) = 5RT/2 3-3
The free energy change for the process in eq 3-1 at a temperature T can
be written in terms of the associated enthalpy and entropy changes
(eq 3-4).
AG°(Mn -» Mn+1) = AH°(Mn -» Mn+1) - TAS°(Mn -» Mn+1) 3-4
The value of n in eq 3-4 for free energy values derived from
experimental charge-transfer equilibrium studies10'19,92 is limited to 0
and -1. The total entropy change for the electron detachment process
(AS°(Mn -» Mn+1)) is equal to Sppoducts° - Speactants° (= S°(e') + S°(Mn+1) -
S°(Mn) ), and can be written as the sum of the translational, rotational,
vibrational and electronic entropy changes eq 3-5.
AS°(Mn -» M^1) = AStrans° + ASrot° + ASvjb° + ASelec° 3-5
41
Since the masses of M"*1 and Mn only differ by the mass of an electron,
Strans° *or Mn+1 and virtually identical and these terms in eq
3-5 will essentially cancel. In eq 3-1 Astrans° is therefore negligibly
different from Strans°(e )• The translational entropy of an ideal gas of
particles of mass m can be predicted from statistical mechanics by the
Sackur-Tetrode equation93 (eq 3-6) where V is the volume of the gas, k
is the Boltzmann constant, L is Avagadro’s constant h, is Planck’s
constant and T is the temperature.*
q °
^trans
3-6
The term ASetec° is given by eq 3-7, where Qeiec is the electronic
partition function.
ASelec° = R ln (Qelec(Products)/Qelec > 3-7
The electron has an electronic degeneracy of 2, and eq 3-7 can therefore
be rewritten as eq 3-8.
ASelec° = R ln /Qelec> + R ln2
3-8
The free energy for electron detachment given in eq 3-2 can now be
given according to the two conventions. The thermal electron convention
includes the terms for the electron gas, and Ag° for electron detachment
is given by eq 3-9.
*Although the Sackur-Tetrode equation gives good agreement between
experiment and theory for the translational entropy of an atomic or .
molecular gas, the equation predicts negative entropies for T < 89 K for
a particle with the mass of an electron. The assignment of the electron
gas as an ideal gas is a completely arbitrary convention since it is
well known that a mole of gaseous electrons is more realistically
described by Fermi-Dirac statistics rather than Boltzmann statistics
under almost all experimental conditions.
42
T T
AG ° (TEC) - AE0_0 + I Cp(Mn*1) dT- JcpiM") dT + -|rT
0 0
- T(ASrot + ASvjb + R ln(Qelec(Mn+1)/Qelec(Mn)) + Strans(e-) + R In 2) 3-9
The stationary electron convention neglects all terms for the electron
gas and Ag° of electron detachment is given by eq 3-10.
T T
AG ° (SEC) - AE0_0 + JCp (Mn+1) dT - f Cp (M n) dT
0 0
- T( Asrot + ASvjb + R ln(Qelec(Mn+1)/Qelec(Mn)) ) 3-10
The temperature at which the two conventions give the same value for
AG°(Mn -» Mn+1) for any species M can be found by subtracting the right
side of eq 3-10 from the right side of eq 3-9 and setting the difference
equal to zero (eq 3-11).
5RT/2 - T(Strans°(e’) + R In 2) =0 3-11
Collecting the constant terms from the Sackur-Tetrode equation gives the
difference between AG° values for each convention at any temperature,
(eq 3-12).
[AG°(TEC) - AG°(SEC)]/J mol'1 = T (118.35 - 8.3145 ln(T)5/2) 3-12
At 0 K, AG0 of electron detachment is equal to the alP or EA values, and
there is no difference between the two conventions. However eq 3-11 is
also equal to zero at 296.96 K, and the two conventions give identical
values for AG at this temperature.
The two conventions applied to simple systems are shown
graphically in Figures 3-1 and 3-2. For M = hydrogen atom, Ag°(H -> H+)
values given by eqs 3-9 and 3-10 are plotted in Figure 3-1 (a). For
43
this system the heat capacity terms for H atom and H+ ion cancel, and
ASrot° and ASvib° are equal to zero. The intersection of the two lines
occurs at 296.96 K where the two conventions give the same value. The
values for each convention at 298 K are within '0.02 kJ mol'1 and so can
be assumed to be approximately equal at this commonly used standard
temperature.
The significance of the result for the hydrogen atom can be seen
in calculations of the absolute thermodynamic potential of the standard
hydrogen electrode,94,95 given by the standard free energy change for eq
3-13.
H+(aq) + e* (g) = 1/2 H2 (g)
3-13
The value of AG° for eq 3-13 can be expressed as the sum of the AG°
values for three elementary steps,94,95 one of which involves the
ionization of a gaseous hydrogen atom, eq 3-14.
H-(g) = H+(g) + e’ (g)
3-14
The value of AG° for this process, and hence the value for the absolute
electrode potential (or "single electrode potential")94,95,9®'9® depends
ultimately on which electron convention is used. The absolute value of
the standard hydrogen electrode is used to obtain the absolute AG° of
electron attachment to molecules in solution. As noted above, by
coincidence there is virtually no difference between the two conventions
at 298 K (absolute E° = 4.44 V) This allows, for example, direct
comparison between data for free energies of electron attachment to gas-
phase molecules, usually obtained under the stationary electron
convention, to the absolute electrode potential of the same system in
solution, usually derived under the thermal electron convention, with no
significant error for T = 298 K due to mixing of conventions.
44
Also shown in Figure 3-1 (b) is a plot of AG0 (I2 -» I2+). Fot this
process appropriate spectroscopic data is available99’101 for I2 and I2+
to allow calculation of the relevant heat capacities, ASrot°, and ASvib°.
The obvious difference between the plots of AG° for the ionization of H
atom and I2 is that the slope for the ion convention values are
opposite. Under the ion convention only the electronic degeneracy of Mn
and Mn+1 is considered and so ASelec° is never equal to zero. Ionization
of H results in a loss of electronic degeneracy (ASelec° = R In 1/2 in
the SEC). For I, a 2H state is formed from a 12„ state, and As^. ° = R
In 3 in the SEC. For most small molecules such as I2 the TAS0 term
arising from a change in electronic degeneracy will produce the largest
difference between the alP of a polyatomic molecule and AG° of
ionization at T > 0 K. The difference in the integrated heat capacities
of I2 and I2+ differ by only 0.09 kJ mol'1 at 298 K and the combined
values of TASrot° and TASy-b0 only amounts to "0.5 kJ mol’1 at 298 K,
somewhat smaller than the contribution from TAS , °. Further, the
elec
enthalpy change arising from the change in the integrated heat
capacities will always have the same sign as the entropy change and
these terms will cancel in the final expression. The predominance of
the ASe^ec° term produces the almost linear change in free energy (SEC)
with temperature as shown in Figure 3-1.
Exactly analogous plots of Ag° of electron attachment to an ion or
neutral molecule under the two electron conventions can be obtained by
plotting the negative of the electron detachment values given in eq 3-9
and 3-10. The AG0 of electron capture for S02 has been calculated by
Chowdhury and co-workers11 at 423 K from the electron affinity8^ of S02
combined with spectroscopic and theoretical data for the geometries and
vibrational frequencies S02 and S02'. The calculation was repeated here
both electron conventions over a range of temperatures, using the same
data (Figure 3-2).
45
The electronic degeneracy change is dominant in the stationary electron
convention, and the dependence of AG°(SEC) on T deviates only slightly
from linearity over the temperature range shown.
Free Energy of lonization/eV
46
Figure 3-1. Plot of the free energies of ionization calculated by using
the thermal electron convention (TEC) and the stationary electron
convention, (a) Atomic hydrogen; (b) Diatomic iodine.
AG of Electron Attachment/eV
47
Termperature/K
Figure 3-2. Plot of the free energy of electron attachment to S02
calculated by using the thermal electron convention (TEC) and the
stationary electron convention (SEC).
CHAPTER 4
INTRAMOLECULAR ENTROPY CHANGES FOR REDOX
COUPLES INVOLVING COMPLEX METAL IONS
Introduction
Entropy changes that occur for electron attachment to gas-phase
polyatomic molecules (Asa°) have been obtained by determining the
temperature dependence of equilibrium constants for gas-phase charge-
transfer reactions (KeC) in eq 2-1) by the procedures described in
chapter 2. The entropy change is obtained from a Van't Hoff plot of the
data. The types of compounds studied to date have been predominantly
organic compounds with delocalized n systems, often containing electron
withdrawing substituents. For these compounds, values of ASa° are small
and typically fall in the range of ± 4 cal mol'1 K'1. An important
consequence of this result is that AGa° and AHa° values are approximately
equal and constant over a wide range of temperatures. In fact, AGg°
values for the organic compounds that have been studied, which are
usually measured at temperatures above 300 K, are typically within 2
kcal mol'1 of their values at 0 K; that is, their electron affinities.
The electron attachment energy data may therefore be combined with other
compiled enthalpy or free energy data at 298 K or at other temperatures
without introducing serious errors.
It is useful to obtain data for the temperature dependence of gas-
phase charge-transfer reactions involving organometallic and
coordination compounds since a more complete understanding of the
thermodynamics of electron attachment at metal centers can be gained.
Additionally, gas-phase AHg° data for organometallic and coordination
compounds, which is obtained from such studies, can be combined with a
48
49
variety of calorimetric thermochemical data for metal-containing
compounds in energy cycles that provide thermodynamic data that are
difficult to obtain by more conventional methods. Examples of the
application of gas-phase electron attachment energies in energy cycles
are given in chapter 5.
Organometallic and coordination compounds are chemically dissimilar
to the types of organic compounds that have been studied and it can not
be assumed that ASg° values for these types of compounds will also be
small in all cases. Temperature dependent gas-phase charge-transfer
equilibrium studies involving metal containing compounds are rare. For
n4-butadiene iron tricarbonyl, ASa° has been quoted to be 10 + 3 cal
mol'1 K'1,* considerably higher than the typical values found for the
organic compounds that have been studied. In principle similar data
could be obtained from FTICR studies if some means were available to
control the temperature of the reaction cell and main chamber (Figure
2-1). Unfortunately, in the determination of AGa° for the metal
complexes reported here, such a facility was not available and entropy
changes could not be measured.
Despite the general lack of experimental data for gas-phase electron
attachment entropies for coordination complexes, data are available from
other sources. Estimates for certain couples can be obtained from
statistical thermodynamics calculations when there are sufficient
structural and vibrational data.
For example, Lowenschuss and Marcus102 have used statistical
mechanics calculations to calculate standard gas-phase entropies for a
large number of polyatomic ions, including the members of the redox
Private communication with G. W. Dillow
50
couples IrCl63'^2' and Fe (CN)6^"/3‘.
Another source of data for entropy changes involving the reduction
of metal complexes is from studies of the temperature dependence of
electrochemical E1/2 values by using cyclic voltammetry. Entropy
changes for half-cell redox couples involving several octahedral and
tris chelate complexes have been obtained in the laboratories of Weaver
and co-workers,103*103. These studies have been primarily concerned with
the relationship between the rate of electron transfer processes between
metal centers in solution and the enthalpic and entropic contributions
to the overall driving force of the reaction.106 Entropy changes for
redox half-cells (Asrc°) obtained by the cyclic voltammetry method are
consistent with the stationary electron convention for dealing with
entropies of electron attachment to gas-phase molecules, since the
electron in the reduction originates from the electrode and cannot be
considered as an "electron gasâ€.
Comparison of data for gas-phase and solution-phase entropy changes
for a particular redox couple leads to the separation of the observed
entropy change in solution into an intramolecular contribution, plus a
contribution from solvent polarization. Such comparisons can not only
provide considerable insight into the magnitudes of entropy changes for
electron attachment to gas-phase coordination complexes, but also lead
to a greater understanding of the role of the solvent in determining the
overall change in entropy for a particular redox couple.
Presented here are the results of statistical mechanics calculations
of the entropy changes involved for electron attachment to some gas-
phase octahedral complexes. The examples given are for complexes that
form stable redox couples in solution. Calculations are repeated for
the ions that form the couples IrCl62*^3’ and Fe(CN)63"^*, which were
originally reported by Lowenschuss and Marcus, but the results are
discussed in the context of the factors that govern the magnitude of
intramolecular entropy changes in redox couples. Calculations are also
51
performed for the ions in the couples Ru (NHj)63+/^+, Co(NHj)^3+/^+ and
WC16°^’. Comparisons are made, where possible, between the theoretical
data obtained here and the experimental data reported in the literature.
The insight gained is used to provide estimates for the gas-phase
entropy changes that occur for electron attachment to M(acac)j and
M(hfac)3 complexes.
Statistical Mechanics Applied to the Determination of
Gas-Phase Intramolecular Entropy Changes for
Redox Couples Involving Complex Metal Ions.
Electron attachment to coordinated transition metal centers is often
into a metal based molecular orbital. The changes in metal-ligand
bonding that result can shift the frequencies of metal-ligand skeletal
vibrations, change the moment of inertia of the molecule by shifting
metal-ligand bond lengths and change ground state electronic
degeneracies. These internal rearrangements redistribute the internal
energy of the molecule or ion and lead to an intramolecular entropy
change (ASj(gas)0). The total change in entropy in the absence of
solvent can be expressed as the sum of the translational, rotational,
vibrational and electronic entropy contributions (eq 4-1).
ASj(gas)0 = ASj(trans)0 + ASjirot)0 + ASj(vib)0 + AS^elec)0 4-1
The contributions ASj(trans)0, AS-(vib)0, etc., for ideal gases can be
evaluated by using the methods of statistical thermodynamics.
Thermodynamic functions can be readily calculated from the appropriate
partition function (
available energy states that are thermally populated, eq 4-2.
<3 - £ 9ie
4-2
52
The value of q in eq 4-2 at a given temperature is dependent on the
degeneracy of the energy states, g-, and the energy separations between
states, AE. The term k is the Boltzmann constant.
The general expression for the rotational, vibrational and
electronic entropies of a system of ideal gaseous particles is given in
eq 4-3.
S
(E-E0)
T
+ R lnq
4-3
The values of As^rot)0, ASj (vib)° and As^elec)0 for gas-phase electron
attachment to a molecule can be found from eq 4-3 by calculating
Sjfrot)0, Sj (vib)° and Suelee)0 for both the oxidized and reduced
species and obtaining the difference between the values for each
species. To evaluate the various contributions to AS1-(gas)0, therefore,
the two terms on the right of eq 4-3 must be evaluated. The term (E-Eg)
is the thermal energy and may also be separated into (E-Eg)trans,
(E-Eg)rot, etc. Thermal energies are calculated from the appropriate
partition function given by eq 4-4.
(E-E0) -RT2 d-j)n^
In statistical thermodynamics calculations of entropies, the
expressions used for As^(rot)0 and ASj(vib)0 are approximations based on
treating the complex as a rigid rotor and the normal modes as harmonic
oscillators. Corrections can be made, but the improvements in the
accuracy of the calculations is small and are not included in the
discussion here. The contributions from ASj(trans)0, ASj(rot)0,
ASj(vib)° and As.(elec)0 to ASj(gas)0 for electron attachment to
octahedral transition metal complexes are discussed below.
53
Changes In Translational Entropy
The translational entropy of a system of ideal particles at a
particular temperature and volume is related to the mass of the
particles. Electron attachment to a molecule has a negligible effect on
the mass and the resulting change in AS-(trans)0 is also negligible. To
evaluate ASj(gas)0, therefore, no consideration need be given to
ASjftrans)0. However, values of gas-phase entropies of single ions are
given below for completeness and a value of (trans)0 is required for
this purpose. The values reported in the present work are given by the
Sackur-Tetrode equation given in eq 4-5.
In eq 4-5, m is the mass of the particle, k is the Boltzmann constant, h
is Plank's constant, V is the volume of the gas and N is Avagadro's
constant.
Changes in Rotational Entropy
The expression for qrot is obtained by substituting the quantum
mechanical expression for rotational energy spacings into eq 4-2. Since
rotational energy spacings are very small compared to kT, the summation
can be replaced by an integral. The result is given in eq 4-6.
<3rot " -^(IABC)3/2(2nkT)3/2
oh* 4-6
Octahedral molecules are classed as spherical tops and the three
principle moments of inertia are the same. The term IABC in eq 4-6 is
the product IAIBIC and is given by IABC = 4mR2 where m is the mass of the
peripheral atoms and R is the distance between the central atom and any
peripheral atom. In eq 4-6, k is the Boltzmann constant, h is Planck's
constant and a is the rotational symmetry number, which is 24 for an
54
octahedral molecule. Substitution of eq 4-6 into eq 4-4 yields the
following expressions for the rotational thermal energy ((E—EQ) rot) Per
mole per degree of freedom.
[E"E0]rot = RT/2
4-7
For all but the lightest ions and molecules the moment of inertia is
large enough that the rotational thermal energy attains its classical
value of RT/2 per degree of freedom. For molecules with a low moment of
inertia the summation in eq 4-2 cannot be accurately replaced by an
integral and must be evaluated either manually, or by using the Euler
Maculaurin summation formula. For this case the thermal energy of the
gas is slightly less than the value in eq 4-7.
For molecules such as octahedral complexes that have 3 degrees of
rotational freedom the thermal energy is 3RT/2. Since the value of
3RT/2 applies to both the oxidized and reduced complex, only ARln q in
eq 4-3 contributes to AS-(rot)0. Substituting eq 4-6 into eq 4-3 gives
an expression for As. (rot)0 for electron attachment to octahedral
molecules, eq 4-8.
4-8
The terms IABC3(red) and IABC3(ox) are the moments of inertia for the
reduced and oxidized metal complex respectively.
In Figure 4-1 a plot is shown of the rotational entropy, given by eq
4-3, for the molecules MF6, MCl6 and MBr6 as a function of increasing
M-X distance at 298 K. It can be seen that all the plots are
approximately linear over the range of typical metal-ligand bond lengths
found in octahedral complexes. Differences in bond lengths observed for
metal complexes that can possess more than one formal oxidation state at
the metal center rarely exceed ± 0.2 Ã. From Figure 4-1 the slope of
55
the plots is close to 3 at 2 Ã and varies little over the range shown.
This sets an approximate upper limit of ASj(rot)0 of ± 0.6 cal mol'1 K'1
for octahedral metal complexes. The precise value can be calculated
from eq 4-8.
For the complexes considered in this chapter the M-L bond lengths
required for the evaluation of rotational entropies were obtained from
literature sources and the data are given in Table 4-1. All bond length
data are from X-ray crystallography studies except the W-Cl bond length
in WC16, which was obtained in the gas-phase by an electron diffraction
study. Values are not available for the M-L distances in IrCl63' and
WCl6'. The values given for the ions in Table 4-1 are estimated values,
obtained by adding 0.05 Ã to the values for IrCl62* and WC16
respectively. For both ions the electron in the lower oxidation state
complex is accommodated in the t2g non-bonding orbital set. Where
structural data are available, this change in M-L bond length is typical
for MX6 ions that are stable in oxidation states of similar electronic
configuration. The error introduced in the value for ASj(rot)0 from
these estimates is small. For the hexacyanoferrate complexes the
rotational entropy was calculated by considering each cyano group as
having an atomic mass of 26.02 amu and situated at the average distance
of the C and N atoms from the metal center (see Table 4-1). For ammine
complexes, rotational entropies were calculated from an effective M-L
bond distance obtained by treating the ammine group as a single atom of
mass 17 amu. The effective M-L distance was calculated from the
appropriate M-N and N-H bond lengths given in Table 4-1.
56
Table 4-1. Metal-Ligand Bond Lengths in Metal Complexes.
Complex
Bond Length/Ã
Complex
IrCl62-
(M-L)
2.307a
Fe(CN) 3'
(M-C)
IrCl63-
(M-L)
2.357 ± 0.05b
(C-N)
Fe(CN)64’
wci6
(M-L)
2.26c
(M-C)
(C-N)
wci6'
(M-L)
2.31d
Ru(NH3)62+
(M-N)
Co (NH3)2+
(M-N)
(N-H)
2.114e
1.0109
(N-H)
(M-L)
Ru(NH3) 3+
(M-L)
2.173h
(M-N)
Co(NH3)3+
(M-L) 1.936f
(N-H) 1.0109
(M-L) 1.995h
aValues taken from ref. 102.
(N-H)
(M-L)
'Value estimated by adding 0.05 Ã to value for IrCl62"(see
cValue in gas-phase from ref. 107.
'Value estimated by adding 0.05 Ã to value for WCl6
eValue of M-N distance from ref. 108.
Value of M-N distance from ref. 109.
9Value of M-N distance from ref. 110
hEffective value is center of mass calculated from M-N and
Bond Length/Ã
1.936a
1.191a
1.900a
1.138a
2.144f
1.0109
2.203h
2.104f
1.0109
2.163h
text) .
N-H distances.
'eoueqsTp puoq puB6T-[--[Bjaui jo uoTjounj b be saxajduioo 9jgw
pua 9iow 9dW TEJPsMEjoo joj saxdojjua jbuotjbjo.1 jo jofd "I-t' Q-znbTj
V/aouD^Q -|-(«|
0
58
Resulting values of rotational entropies for the complexes
Table 4-7, with the values of the total standard gas-phase
AS1- (gas)°.
are given in
entropies,
Changes in Vibrational Entropy
The expression for qyjb is given in eg 4-9.
^vib
1
1-e ~x
4-9
Vibrational energy spacings are typically larger than kT and the
summation in eg 4-2 can not be replaced by an integral. Equation 4-9 is
given from a binomial expansion of eq 4-2. In eq 4-9 the term x is
hcu/kT, in which u is the frequency of the vibrational mode and c is the
speed of light. The vibrational thermal energy per degree of freedom
can be found by substituting eq 4-9 into eq 4-3. The result is given in
eq 4-10.
[E-E0] vib
4-10
Since the magnitude of vibrational energy spacings are typically close
to or larger than kT, the value of (E-Eo)vib some fraction of RT per
mol, per degree of freedom. Changes in vibrational frequencies that
occur on electron attachment cause a change in both qyib and (E-E0)yjb
and both terms on the right of eq 4-3 therefore contribute to ASj(vib)0.
Substituting the expressions for (E-E0)yjb and 3vib into etJ 4-4 gives an
expression for ASj(vib)0 (eq 4-11).
4-11
Equation 4-11 includes the summation over all normal modes in the
59
Figure 4-2. Plot of the entropy of a vibrational mode as a function of
the vibrational frequency.
60
oxidized and reduced species, the frequencies of which are included in
xR and xQ. The definitions of xR and xQ are the same as that given for x
in eq 4-7, but apply to the reduced and oxidized species respectively.
The vibrational characteristics of metal complexes suggests that
vibrational entropy changes can be significant in certain cases. In
Figure 4-2 vibrational entropy is plotted as a function of vibrational
frequency at 298 K. It can be seen that S^vib)0 increases dramatically
as the frequency of a vibrational mode decreases. For organometallic
and coordination compounds, vibrations associated with metal-ligand
skeletal modes are typically in the range of 100-700 cm"1. Shifts in
these frequencies, of the magnitude that occur for a change in formal
oxidation state at the metal center, can cause significant changes in
entropy per vibrational mode, especially at low frequencies. Moreover,
a non-linear molecule has 3N-6 vibrational modes (where N is the number
of atoms in the molecule). For MX6 octahedral complexes there are
therefore a total of 15 skeletal vibrations that enter into the
summation in eq 4-11.
Vibrational frequencies used to calculate the vibrational entropies
for the complexes considered in this chapter are given in Tables 4-2 to
4-4. The assumption is used throughout that the vibrational frequencies
reported, observed in solution and in the solid state, are the same as
their gas-phase values. Since a small dependency on the polarizing
nature of counter ions is observed for solid state spectra, solution-
phase data are used wherever possible. The only frequencies used that
are obtained from solid state spectra are for the IR active T1u modes.
These are the only IR active vibrations and account for 6 of the 15
possible skeletal modes for MX6 complexes and 12 of the 33 possible
vibrational modes in M(XY)6 complexes. The Raman active vibrations are
Alg, Eg and T2g. The T2u and Tlg modes are inactive. Frequencies for
these modes are either estimated or are obtained from the results of
reported force-field calculations (see Tables 4-2 to 4-4). The error
61
Table 4-2. Assignments of Vibrational Frequencies (cm~1) for
Hexachloride Metal Complexes.
A1
Aig
Eg
«3
T1u
>
T1u
«5
T2g
^6
T2u
IrCl62'*a
353
225
333
184
196
139b
IrCl63'
323
303
309
200
161
144
wci6a
437
331
373
160
182
129b
WCl6*'a
378
318
330
158
168d
127b
frequencies taken from ref. 111.
bThe T2 bend is infrared and Raman inactive; value obtained from
u6 = u5(2"1/2), see text.
frequencies taken from ref. 112.
hvalue from ref. 113.
62
Table 4-3. Assignments of Vibrational Frequencies (cm'1) for Hexacvano
Metal Complexes.
Fe(CN)63'»a
Skeletal M-C
u2
u4
u7
U9
U11
u13
Vibrations
E9
T
x1u
rp
T2g
i2u
390
324
511
95
102
to
XT
M-C-N
Vibrations
T19
u8
T1u
>
T2g
u12
T2u
351b
387
410
381b
C-N
Vibrations
"l
A19
^3
Eg
*6
T1u
2136
2136
2105
Fe(CN)64'
Skeletal M-C
u2
u4
u7
u9
U11
u13
Vibrations
Aig
E
9
T1u
T1u
T2g
T2u
410
390
585
95
102
to
XT
M-C-N
Vibrations
«5
Tlg
>
T1u
>
T2g
T2u
350b
414
420
402b
C-N
Vibrations
O)
u3
E9
u6
T1u
2080
2048
2033
aAll frequencies taken from ref. 114.
bAll T1g and T2u modes are both infrared and Raman inactive; values given
are from the normal coordinate analysis in the reference in footnote a.
63
Table 4-4. Assignments of Vibrational Frequencies (cm'1) in Hexammine
Metal Complexes.
Ru(NH3)63+-a
Skeletal M-N u
Vibrations
1
*19
L1u
L1u
L2g
l2u
500
475
463
273
248
175c
Lig
L1u
2g
L2u
Ammonia
Rocking
Vibrations
788c
788c
788
788c
Ru(NH3)62+>a
Skeletal M-N u1 i>2
Vibrations A,_ E
ig 9
450 430
409d 170e 170e 120b
270e 270e 190b
ig
L1u
2g
2u
769c 769c
769c
Ammonia
Rocking
Vibrations
769
64
Table 4-4 continued.
Co(NH3)63+'a
Skeletal M-N
Vibrations
U1
Alg
u2
E9
u3
T1u
u4
T1u
u5
T2g
u6
T2u
494
442
475
331
322
228b
Tl9
T1u
T2g
T2u
Ammonia
Rocking
830c
831
830
830c
Vibrations
Co
(NH3)
2+.a
Skeletal M-N
Vibrations
ig
L1u
1u
L2g
l2u
357
255
325
192
187’
132c
ig
L1u
2g
l2u
Ammonia
Rocking
Vibrations
654c
654
654c
654c
aFrequencies taken from ref. 115.
kvalue for u6 obtained from u6 = i>5(2‘1/2), see text.
CT^ and T- rocking vibrations are infrared and Raman inactive and T2
value may be unavailable. Frequencies given are assumed to be the same
as the T1(J mode given in ref. 116.
dOnly available frequency, from ref. 117, others estimated.
eNo data available. Frequencies given represent estimated lower limits
(values for Cd(NH3)62+) and upper limits (values for Ru(NH3),3+) taken
from ref. 115.
fValue obtained from approximate narallel relationship between
variations in frequencies for Co3 and Co2+ complex.
65
limit placed on all estimated frequencies is ± 10%. The most
potentially serious error in the calculation of vibrational entropies
comes from the estimated frequency of the inactive T2u skeletal bending
mode. The frequency of this mode is typically in the region of 100 cm"1
or so and any uncertainty produces a large error in the vibrational
entropy (see Figure 4-2). For most of the complexes in Tables 4-2 to 4-
4 the skeletal T2u mode was obtained from the relationship u6 = i>5(2‘1/2).
The relationship is predicted theoretically and has been shown to
correctly predict values of u6 for some XY6 compounds in which the
central atom has a closed shell electronic configuration.118 For dn
octahedral transition metal hexafluorides, for which u6 is available
from combination bands or resonance phosphorescence spectra, the
relationship is generally observed to hold to within the error limits of
± 10% given here.
For Ru(NH3)62+ data for the frequencies of the skeletal modes have
not been reported, except for the T1u mode (see Table 4-4). The
frequencies given in Table 4-4 are estimations based on calculations and
observed frequencies for other hexaammine complexes of M+2 ions. In
addition to the skeletal modes given for the hexaammine complexes in
Table 4-4, frequencies are reported for the ammine ligand N-H rocking
vibrations. Unlike the skeletal modes, these frequencies are available
for Ru(NHj)62+.116 The N-H rocking vibrations are the only other
vibrations of low enough frequency to contribute significantly to the
vibrational entropy for these complexes. There are a total of 12 modes
(T1gf T1u, T2g and T2u) of which only the T1(J and T2g modes are infrared or
Raman inactive. These frequencies are observed at 831 cm"1 and 830cm"1
respectively for Co(NH3)63+, but only the infrared active T1u modes are
observed for the other complexes. It is assumed that the inactive modes
are of the same frequency within the error limits given. These
relatively high frequency modes only contribute a few cal mol'1 K"1 to
AS1- (vib)°.
66
Changes in Electronic Entropy
Electronic energy separations are usually large compared to kT. The
exponential term in eq 4-2 is therefore close to zero and qelec is
usually equal to the degeneracy of the ground electronic state. The
maximum possible degeneracy of an electronic state is given by the
product of the total spin and orbital degeneracies. The required
information is carried in the spectroscopic term symbol for the state.
Under the octahedral point group the orbital degeneracy is denoted by
the symbols A, singly degenerate; E, doubly degenerate; and T, triply
degenerate. The total spin degeneracy (multiplicity) is given by 2S+1
where S is the total spin angular momentum and is denoted in the
superscript preceding the orbital symbol. The spectroscopic term
symbols for octahedral complexes are derived purely from the symmetry of
the metal d orbitals in an octahedral ligand field. In reality, the
degeneracy of the electronic ground state of a particular complex can be
split in energy. The extent of the splitting depends on the structure
of the complex and the nature of the electronic state itself. The
ground state electronic degeneracy of the complex may therefore be less
than the value suggested by the spectroscopic term symbol, since it is
dependent on the thermal population of the energetically split states.
There are two principle effects that contribute to the splitting of
orbital degeneracies, spin-orbit coupling and distortions from perfect
octahedral symmetry.
Spin-orbit coupling. The coupling of spin and orbital angular
momenta of the d electrons results in a splitting of electronic
degeneracy. For A and E ground states there is no orbital angular
momentum and consequently no spin-orbit coupling. For T ground states
the orbital and angular momenta couple and the electronic degeneracy is
lifted. For complexes of the first transition series metal ions,
orbital splittings are typically in the range of 100 - 1000 cm'1
(~kT/2 - -5kT). The actual value depends on the metal, its oxidation
67
state, the value of the Racah electronic repulsion parameter (B), and
the magnitude of the ligand field (lODq). For second and third row
metals the effect is greater and orbital splittings are generally in the
range of 500 - 5000 cm'1.
Distortions from octahedral symmetry. Molecules that have orbitally
degenerate ground states have a tendency to physically distort to move
to a state of lower energy and lower symmetry, removing the orbital
degeneracy of the state. This statement is a simplified form of the
Jahn-Teller theorem.119,120 The effect is observed to occur for
octahedral metal complexes. For example, Ti(H20 ) 63+, which has
ground state is not purely octahedral and the t2g + eg orbitals are
split into a set of b1g, alg, b2g and eg states. The single electron
resides in the lowest energy blg orbital. Similarly, for ions such as
Cu2+, a pure octahedral ligand field would produce a degenerate Eg set
of orbitals containing three electrons. From experiment, the orbitals
are found to be split such that the unpaired electron resides in a state
of single orbital degeneracy. The magnitude of the orbital splitting is
typically in the range of about several hundred wave numbers up to about
2000 cm'1 (observed for Cu2+ complexes), and so are comparable to the
magnitudes of splittings due to spin-orbit coupling. For tris-chelate
complexes (D3 symmetry) a trigonal distortion is possible if the "bite
angle" of the ligand is not precisely 90°. In this case, the degenerate
t2g set (octahedral symmetry) is split into a set of A1 and E orbitals.
The Eg set in octahedral symmetry remains a doubly degenerate E set in
D3 symmetry. An example of the degree of trigonal splittings in
M(acac)3 complexes has been reported for Co (acac) 3.121 The crystal
structure of Co(acac)344 reveals an average O-Co-O bite angle of 97.3°.
From studies on the polarized crystal spectra of Co(acac)3 the 1A1 -> 1T1
transition was found to be split by the trigonal field into components
at 16200 cm’1 (1A) and 17000 cm'1 (1E);11 that is, a splitting of
800 cm’1.
68
The geometry of the complex in the gas-phase has not been reported.
The entropy of an electronic state can be evaluated from eq 4-3. In
the absence of a thermally accessible higher lying states, the entropy
of a ground electronic state is given by S = R In g, where g is the
degeneracy of the ground state. If thermal population of higher lying
states is possible, the entropy of the state must be considered in terms
of the thermal population of the split states; that is, the electronic
partition function (qeLec) must be evaluated. An orbitally split state
that can be thermally populated will also posess a thermal energy
((E-E0)e^ec) . This thermal energy must also be considered when
evaluating the entropy of the state, as defined by equation 4-3. An
example of the relationship between the entropy of an electronic state
and the splitting of the degeneracy of the state by an energy AE at two
temperatures is given in Figure 4-3 for the example of a 2E state. For
AE = 0 the entropy is given by S = R In g and for a 2E state this is
equal to R In 4 (2.75 cal mol'1 K'1). The splitting of the state is
shown in Figure 4-3 (a). As AE increases the value of qelec, given by
qelec = 2(1 + e("AE/RT>), rapidly decreases and R In qelec rapidly
approaches a value of R In 2 (1.38 cal mol’1 K’1) as shown in Figure 4-3
(b). For AE > 0 (E-Eo)eiec i-ncreasesf reaches a maximum value, and then
approaches 0 as Ae becomes so large that the upper state is no longer
thermally accessible. The value of (E-Eo)eiec ^"s 9^-ven
[ (e( 4E/RT)) / (1 + e('AE/RT))] AE and has been shown by Lias and Ausloos92c to
reach a maximum of “0.2 kcal mol"1 for a 2E state. The contribution to
the entropy is given from (E-EQ)elec/T, which is also shown in Figure 4-3
(b). The overall effect on the entropy of the state is that it also
converges on the value of R In 2, but retains a significant amount of
its orbitally degenerate value, even for orbital splittings as high as
800 cm'1. It can be seen that at 350 K, relative to 298 K the entropy
of the state is less diminished from its orbitally degenerate value for
the same orbital
69
(a)
t
Ã
U
i
(b)
= 350 K
= 298 K
Figure 4-3. The electronic entropy of a 2E state, (a) The electronic
state split by an energy AE; (b) Plot illustrating the contributions of
the terms in eq 4-3 to the entropy of a 2E state, as a function of the
splitting energy AE.
70
splitting. At absolute zero no thermal population of higher lying
states is possible and the entropy of the state is given by the
degeneracy of the lowest lying state.
Assessing the entropies of electronic around states. The combined
effects of spin-orbit coupling and distortions from octahedral symmetry
give a characteristic splitting of electronic degeneracy for a
particular metal complex that is dependent on the metal ion, its
oxidation state and the nature of the coordinated ligand. Since the
energy spacings are typically on the order of magnitude of kT, a range
of states in the electronic manifold can be thermally populated,
depending on the resulting energy spacings and the temperature. The
increasing population of higher lying states with temperature is
particularly manifest in the temperature dependence of the magnetic
susceptibility of transition metal complexes.122
In Table 4-5, estimates are given for the change in electronic
entropy for the redox couples containing the octahedral ions considered
here. For the complexes with A and E ground states, the orbital angular
momentum is quenched and so the electronic degeneracy is not split by
spin-orbit coupling. For A ground states, therefore, the entropy of the
electronic state was estimated by assuming that the electronic partition
function is equal to the spin degeneracy. For E ground states, the
orbital degeneracy may be split by distortions from octahedral symmetry.
The entropy of the state depends on the thermal population of the upper
state. As shown in Figure 4-3, for typical values of the energy
separation between the states, the upper state can be accessible at
ordinary temperatures. Since the energy spacings between the split
states are not known, the entropy of E states was estimated from the
average value obtained from the spin degeneracy and the total degeneracy
of the state. For T states, the splitting pattern becomes more complex
due to the effect of spin-orbit coupling, especially for first
transition series metal ions. The lowest energy manifold for electronic
71
Table 4-5. Electronic Entropy Changes For Redox Couples.
Redox Couple
Change in
Electronic
Ground State ASj(elec)0,a
Fe(CN)63'/4‘(soln)
IrCl62'/3’(soln)
WC160/' (soln)
Co (NHj) 63+/2+ (soln)
Ru(NH3)63+/2+(soln)
Sc (acac) 30/' (gas)
Ti(acac)30/f‘ (gas)
V(acac)30/" (gas)
Cr (acac) 30/' (gas)
Mn (acac) 30/" (gas)
Fe (acac) 30/' (gas)
Co (acac) 30/‘ (gas)
1,
'1
-1.78 ± 1.78
-1.78 ± 1.78
-0.58 ± 2.20
2.48 ± 2.48
-1.78 ± 1.78
1.78 ± 1.78
0.41 ± 3.98
0.58 ± 2.19
1.15 ± 0.69
-0.34 ± 0.69
-0.87 ± 2.71
2.48 ± 2.48
aValues are AS0 in cal mol*1 K"1. Calculated for ox + e’ -* red in the ion
convention. Entropy of the free electron is not included.
72
states split by spin-orbit coupling can have a lower degeneracy than the
spin degeneracy122 and a realistic evaluation of the range of values of
the electronic partition function is difficult to estimate. For the
complexes that have T ground states in Table 4-5, the electronic entropy
was estimated from a value of the partition function taken as the
average of 1 to the maximum degeneracy of the state, as given by the
appropriate term symbol. Estimates of electronic energy spacings, and
hence the electronic partition function, can be obtained from matching
the observed temperature dependence of the magnetic susceptibility of a
complex to the theoretical temperature dependence, derived from
theoretical energy spacings, but such data are scarce.
Comparison of Solution-Phase and Gas-Phase Entropy Changes for Some
Redox Couples Involving Octahedral Metal Complexes
Entropy Changes for Solution-Phase Redox Couples
The experimental method for obtaining entropy changes for half-cell
redox couples involves the use of cyclic voltammetry in a non-thermal
cell arrangement that permits the temperature of the half-cell
containing the redox couple of interest to be varied, while the
temperature of the other half-cell, containing the reference electrode
is held constant. The method provides a simple means to evaluate the
difference between the absolute ionic entropies of the reduced and
oxidized halves of the couple (ASrc°), given in eq 4-12.
ASr°c - Sr°ed - S0°x 4-12
Interpretation of entropy changes for redox couples involving
coordination complex ions to date has centered on the difference in the
degree of solvation of the oxidized and reduced forms of the ions in the
redox couples. Changes in solvation entropies are expected, since
reduction of a complex is accompanied by a change in the charge on the
complex ion. However, dielectric continuum models have not provided an
adequate description of observed ASrc° values. In particular, the
anomalous entropy changes associated with Co(III)/Co(II) couples (in
comparison to analogous Ru(III)/Ru(II) couples) have evaded satisfactory
quantitative explanation. By calculating intramolecular entropy changes
for redox couples involving coordination complexes by using statistical
mechanics, the intramolecular and solvent contributions to ASrc° can be
estimated.
Several AS ° values have been determined by various workers and a
rc J
selection of the results for various redox couples are given in Table
4-6. The solvent for all redox couples in Table 4-6 is water. Also
given in Table 4-6 are the theoretical values of ASpc° predicted by the
Born equation (ASBorn°). The Born equation124 is based on a purely
electrostatic model and can be used to obtain the change in free energy
and entropy when a charge is transferred from a conducting sphere in a
vacuum to an identical sphere in a medium of dielectric constant e (eqs
4-13 and 4-14).
4-13
q2 /dine\
2zTe\dlnT/p
4-14
In eqs 4-13 and 4-14, q is the charge on the conducting sphere and e is
the dielectric constant of the medium. When the medium is water at 25°C
and the spheres are ions of absolute charge ze, eqs 4-13 and 4-14 can be
written in the convenient forms of eqs 4-15 and 4-16.
AGB°orn - -163.89
kcal mol"1
4-15
74
Table 4-6. Experimental and
Theoretical
Entropies
for Redox Couples
Redox Couple
AS °'a
rc
As„ °*a
Born
- AS 0
abBorn
A(M_L^g.)
) Distance/A
Ru(NH3)63+/2+'c
18.5
14.6
3.9
0.040e
Os(NH3)63+/2+'b
18 ± 0.5
14.6
3.3
Co(NH3)63+/2+'d
45
14.6
30
0.178e
Ru (en)33+/2+,b
13 + 0.5
13.0
0
Co(en)33+/2+,b
37 + 2
13.0
24
Ru(H20 ) 63+/2+>c
38 ± 3
14.6
23
Co(H20)63+/2+'d
60
14.6
45
Fe(H20)3+/2+'b
43
14.6
28.4
Ru(bipy)33+/2+>c
1 ± 2
7
-6
-0.048f
Fe(bipy)33+/2+'c
2 ± 2
5
-5
Co (b ipy) 33+/2+»c
22 ± 3
7
14
Fe(CN)63'/4'«c
-41.5
-15
-27
-0.036e
aAll values given in cal mol'
1 K'1.
hoata from ref.
103.
cData from ref.
104.
dFrom ref. 105 (value estimated by authors).
eData from Table 4-1.
fData from ref. 123.
75
AS
o
Born
-9.649
cal mol_1 K 1
4-16
The Born equation is most successfully applied to large and
approximately spherical ions of low charge, and where specific
solute/solvent interactions are absent. For these ions, the effect of
changes in size of the ion with changes in the oxidation state of the
metal and the effect of dielectric saturation are both minimized. It
should be noted that for the reduction of a complex bearing a positive
charge the sign of Asgorn0 is positive. For neutral complexes and those
bearing a negative charge, the sign of ASBorn° is negative. A more
positive entropy can be associated with ions of lower charge, since
there will be less "ordering" of the surrounding solvent molecules.
Comparing the experimental and theoretical entropy changes for the
redox couples in Table 4-6, it is seen that there is generally a poor
agreement between the two values. However, the theoretical value serves
as a reference point to which the experimental values can be compared in
the absence of specific solute-solvent interactions. The sign and
magnitude of the deviations of experimental results from ASBorn° provide
information about the nature and the extent of the changes in specific
solute-solvent interactions that occur on reduction of a particular
metal complex. The difference between ASrc° and ASBorn° for each couple
is included in Table 4-6 for this purpose.
It is particularly interesting to note in Table 4-6 that for the
couples Ru(bipy)3+/2+ (where bipy = 2,2' -bipyridine) and Fe(CN)63'/4', for
which the nature of the M-L bonding is more complex than simple a
bonding, that the value of Asrc° - AsBom° is negative. For each of these
couples the average M-L bond length in the reduced form of the complex
is shorter than in the oxidized form. The arguments generally invoked
to explain this phenomenon is that the energies of the metal orbitals
are raised in the reduced form of the complex, which provides a better
76
energy match with ligand tt orbitals, and subsequently an overall
increase in the degree of (M-L) bonding. A related argument was used by
Yee and Weaver to account for the negative value of ASrc° - ASBorn° for
the Ru(bipy)33+/2+ couple.10^ It was suggested that two competing effects
are in operation. The water molecules close to the ruthenium center,
including those surrounding the ligands, will be less polarized and
therefore less "ordered" in the lower oxidation state, giving rise to a
positive contribution to ASrc°. However, the water molecules adjacent
to the bipyridine rings may experience an increase in polarization in
going to the Ru(II) state since the added t2g electron will be
significantly delocalized around the aromatic rings, acting to increase
their net charge density. The latter contribution would give a negative
contribution to ASrc°. An opposite effect was used to describe the
anomalously large value of ASrc° for Co(bipy)33+/2+. The Co(III) -»
Co(II) reactions involve the electronic conversion t2g6 -» t2g5 eg2, which
should minimize the extent of electron delocalization in the reduced
state and therefore discourage any increase in solvent polarization in
the vicinity of the bipyridine rings. Further, the expansion at the
metal center was suggested to lead to an especially large decrease in
the polarization of nearby water molecules. It seems that the arguments
for the negative value of Asrc° - ASBorn° for the Ru (bipy)33+/2+ couple are
not without merit, since an alternative explanation is difficult to
conceive. The explanation for the Co (bipy )33+/2+ couple may be
questionable, however, since the large difference of approximately 22
cal mol"1 K"1 between the Ru (bipy)33+/2+ and Co(bipy)33+/2+ couples is
consistently found for other couples involving reductions at Ru(III) and
Co(III) centers where only M-L a bonding is possible. It seems that
whatever mechanism is operative in causing a negative value of ASrc°
- ASBorn° for the Ru (bipy )33+/2+ couple is also operative for Co(bipy)33+/2+
and alternative explanations of the large observed differences in ASrc°
must be considered.
77
Intramolecular Contributions to ASrc°
Single ion hydration entropies have been obtained for many monatomic
and polyatomic ions by evaluating the entropy change for the
transference of a gas-phase ion M of charge n to the solution phase
according to the reaction Mn(gas) -» Mn(aq).125*128 The value of AS0 for
the reaction is given by eq 4-17
4-17
ASj (hyd) ° - Si (gas) ° - S* (aq) ° + 6.35 cal mol "1 K'1
The value of 6.35 cal mol’1 K'1 (R In 24.41) arises from the different
standard states for the gas-phase and the solution phase. The value of
S1- (gas)0 and Sj(aq)° for a particular ion are typically quite different,
the value of Sj(aq)0 being smaller and often negative. Translational
freedom is restricted and it is uncertain how rotational motion will be
affected. Also polarization of the solvent may contribute greatly to
the difference in entropy of an ion between the two phases. Although
AS^aq)0 data are available for a large number of polyatomic ions, there
are apparently no reports on comparisons made between ASj(gas)0 and
ASj (aq)° for ionic species in redox couples. The results of the
calculations that yield the gas-phase entropies of the octahedral
complexes considered in the present work are presented in Table 4-7.
From the results of the calculations it can be seen that S-(trans)0 is
the same for the oxidized and reduced species, and that S-(rot)0 is
within ±0.5 cal mol’1 K'1 (Figure 4-1). It can be anticipated that
these terms will also remain constant between the oxidized and reduced
species in solution. Much larger differences in entropy can potentially
arise from S^vib)0 and Suelee)0, and the calculated gas-phase values
should remain unchanged between the two phases. In considering the
total difference in entropy for a redox couple involving octahedral
transition metal ions in solution, therefore, eq 4-18 will apply.
78
ASt°c - AS^vib) ° + ASi(elec) ° +AS°olv 4-18
In eq 4-18, ASsoly° is the difference in the entropy of solvation of the
ions in the redox couple. There are two situations where the
contribution of ASsoly° to ASrc° can be separated from ASrc° so that the
contributions from ASj(vib)0 and ASj(elec)0 may be estimated. For ions
of large radii, ASsoly° in water is predicted by the Born equation (4-16)
to be small and therefore ASrc° = ASj(vib)0 + ASj(elec)0. Also, when
comparing two redox couples of different metal ions coordinated by the
same ligand, and undergoing the same change in oxidation states, Assoly°
is constant and AASrc° = AAS^vib)0 + AASj(elec)0.
It is illuminating to compare the results of the gas-phase
calculations, which are given in Table 4-7, to the experimental results
obtained in aqueous solution, which are given in Table 4-6. For the
ions that form the redox couples Ru (NHj) 63+/2+, IrCl62"/3', WC160/" and
Fe(CN)63*/4' the difference in gas-phase entropies is small and therefore
only ASsolv° will contribute to ASpc. For the Co(NH3)63+/2+ couple
ASjfgas)0 = 17.8 cal mol"1 K’1. The origin of the comparatively large
value of ASj (gas)0 can be traced to the difference in spin states
between the oxidized and reduced species. In Co(II) complexes the M-L
bonding is significantly weakened relative to Co(III) complexes as a
result of the doubly occupied antibonding eg metal based orbitals in the
Co(II) state. As a result, the skeletal vibrational modes are shifted
to substantially lower frequencies and a large increase in vibrational
entropy results. The greater electronic degeneracy of the Co(II) state
also gives rise to a significant increase in ASj(elec)0 (Table 4-6).
The change in spin state for Co(III)/(ll) couples has been observed
to greatly shift skeletal vibrational frequencies for other octahedral
and pseudo-octahedral complexes of cobalt. For example, for tris
complexes of 2,2'-bipyridine and the related ligand 1,10-phenanthroline
Table 4-7. Gas-Phase Standard Molar Entropies of Octahedral Ions
Complex
Sj (vib)0,a
Sj (rot)0,3
Sj(elec)0
ia
Sj(trans)3
Sj (gas)0,a
IrCl62"
Skel.
30.6
+
0.7
25.0
1.8
+
1.8
43.9
101.3 ± 2.5
IrCl63"
Skel.
30.5
±
0.3
25.2 ± 0.3
0
43.9
99.6 ± 0.6
wci6
Skel.
30.0
±
0.6
24.9
2.8
43.8
101.5 ± 0.6
wci6-
Skel.
31.2
±
0.6
25.0 ± 0.3
1.8
±
1.8
43.8
101.8 ± 2.7
Fe(CN)63"
Skel.
34.6
±
0.6
24.7
1.8
+
1.8
42.0
115.8 + 3.4
M-C-N
12.7
+
1.0
C-N
<0.01
Fe(CN)64"
Skel.
34.3
+
0.6
24.5
0
42.0
112.1 ± 1.6
M-C-N
11.3
±
1.0
C-N
<0.01
Ru(NH3)62+
Skel
25.4
±
3.8
22.6
0
41.6
92.4 ± 4.8
NH3(r)
2.8
±
1.0
Ru(NH3)63+
Skel.
21.5
±
0.7
22.5
1.8
+
1.8
41.6
90.0 ± 3.5
NH3(r)
2.6
±
1.0
Co(NH3)63+
Skel.
17.9
±
0.6
22.0
0
41.1
83.2 ± 1.4
NH3(r)
2.2
±
0.8
Co(NH3)62+
Skel.
30.5
±
1.2
22.5
2.5
+
2.5
41.1
101.0 ± 4.9
NH3(r)
4.4
±
1.2
aAll values are given in cal mol"1 K"1.
80
(1,10-phen) complexes of the same metal ion have similar M-L vibrational
frequencies. For Fe (bipy )33* infrared active M-N vibrations are
observed at 384 and 367 cm'1.129 For Fe(bipy)32+ these frequencies are
shifted slightly to 386 and 376 cm'1 respectively.129 For
Co(1,10-phen)3+ similar frequencies to these are observed at 378 and 370
cm'1,130 but for Co(bipy)32+ are shifted to substantially lower
frequencies at 266 and 228 cm'1.129 Large contributions to vibrational
entropy can be generally expected for cobalt couples that undergo the
same change in spin state, although a complete set of data for all the
vibrational frequencies that are different between the oxidized and
reduced species are required to quantitatively evaluate ASj(vib)0. For
all the redox couples involving Co(III)/Co(II) reductions in Table 4-6
the same spin change is involved and values for ASrc° are constantly 22-
25 cal mol'1 K'1 higher than the corresponding Ru(III)/Ru(II) couples.
The difference in the values of ASj(gas)0 for the couples Co(NH3)63+^2+
and Ru(NH3)63+/2+ obtained from the calculations in the present work is
15.4 cal mol"1 K'1. The result demonstrates the importance of
intramolecular entropy changes for Co(III)/Co(II) redox couples, and
offers a feasible explanation of the large differences in ASrc° for the
Ru(III)/(II) and Co(III)/(II) redox couples studied in aqueous solution.
The Relationship Between The Free Energy and Enthalpy of
Gas-Phase Electron Attachment to MfacacK and M(hfac)3 Complexes
The electron attachment energies quoted for the M(acac)3 and
M(hfac)3 complexes in the present work are free energies (AGg0) obtained
at 350 K. The data would serve a wider range of applications in
thermochemistry if values of AG ° and AH 0 could be obtained at other
temperatures. It is particularly useful to obtain AHa° data at 0 K and
at 298.15 K. Values for AHa° at 0 K are the electron affinities of the
complexes, which may be used and compared with other electron affinity
81
data. Values for AHg° at 298.15 K can be readily combined in energy
cycles with compiled data for other processes. The relationship between
AGg° at an experimental temperature (Tgxp) and AHg° and AGg° at a
different temperature (T) is given in equations 4-19 and 4-20
Texp
AGa°(T) - AGa°(Texp) + ASa°[Texp-T] - f Cp (M) dT + fcp(M‘)dT 4-19
T T
Texp T^jjp
AHa°(T) - AGa°(Texp) + TexpASa - I Cp (M) dT + f Cp(M')dT 4-20
T T
It is often assumed that temperature dependence of AHg° and ASa° for
electron attachment or ionization of a neutral molecule is negligible.
For example, for electron capture by a species M to form M"; AGg°(0 K) =
AHg° (0 K) = the electron affinity of (M), and equation 4-20 has been
used by Kebarle to quote electron affinities of organic compounds,
neglecting the integral terms. Lias and Ausloos920 have explored the
validity of this assumption by performing statistical thermodynamics
calculations on several organic and inorganic compounds from
spectroscopic data. As shown above, and stated more explicitly by Lias
and Ausloos, the difference in translational and rotational thermal
energy between a species M and its ion (M+ or M') is negligible.
Differences can only arise from (E-E0)vjb and (E—EQ)eiec* Under the
convention the volume of the electron gas is zero and so for electron
attachment AP =AV = 0. Therefore, C = C and Ae = AH. Lias and
V p
Ausloos showed that from the compounds they studied, the largest
difference between the adiabatic ionization potential (0 K) and the
enthalpy of ionization of enthalpy at 350 K arose for ethylene, which
_ ^ *
was 0.22 kcal mol less exothermic at the higher temperature.
In order to determine AHg°(T) for the metal complexes in this study
ASg° must be known. Any uncertainty in this value will lead to the
largest error in AHg°(T), since the absolute magnitude of TexpASg° in eq
82
4-20 can be expected to be significantly greater than the absolute
magnitude of the sum of the integral terms. From the calculations given
above for pairs of octahedral transition metal complex ions that form
redox couples (Table 4-7), it can be seen that where the acceptor
orbital is a non-bonding metal t2g, ASg° is ± 3 cal mol"1 K’1. This value
is comparable to the organic compounds for which ASg° has been
determined experimentally and can be expected to apply for electron
capture by the M(acac)3 and M(hfac)3 complexes of Sc, Ti, V and Fe.
From the results of the calculations given in Table 4-7, for the gas-
phase Co(NH3)63+/2+ couple a larger value of ASa° (17.8 cal mol’1 K"1) was
obtained, which was attributed to a consequence of the difference in d
electron configuration between the oxidized and reduced forms. The same
difference in electronic configuration is expected to exist for the
Co(acac)30/" (g) and Co(hfac)30/" (g) couples and ASa° may also be in the
range of 20 cal mol’1 K’1.* For the acac and hfac complexes of Cr and Mn
electron capture results in the following changes in d electron
configuration; Cr t2g3 -» t2g3 eg1; Mn, t2g3 eg1 -» t2g3 eg2. In each case the
additional electron is accommodated in the antibonding eg set and ASg°
may be in the range of 0 - 20 cal mol’1 K*1.
Conclusions
The results of the calculations presented here demonstrate the
importance of intramolecular entropy changes that occur on electron
attachment to coordination complexes. For solution-phase redox couples,
intramolecular entropy changes are generally smaller than the entropy
change occurring in the surrounding solvent. However, in special cases
*It is not profitable to attempt similar calculations directly for
M(acac)3 and M(acac)3' complexes. There is considerable disagreement in
the literature concerning the interpretation of the rather complex
infrared and Raman spectra for M(acac)3 complexes.
83
such as the Co(III)/(II) couples considered here, intramolecular entropy
changes may contribute significantly to the total entropy change for the
redox couple, even for ions of quite small radii. In the case of redox
couples involving large ions such as Co(bipy)33+/2+ differential
solvation effects are expected to be relatively small and ASrc° can
probably be attributed almost entirely to an intramolecular entropy
change. For example, ASrc° for [Fe(bipy)3]3+/2+ and [Co(bipy)3]3+/2+ are 2
cal mol'1 K'1 and 22 cal mol’1 K"1 in water, respectively. Although
extensive calculations of the vibrational partition functions cannot be
carried out for these ions due to the lack of spectroscopic data, the
-20 cal mol'1 K*1 difference in the ASrc° values is understandable in
view of the changes in M-N stretching (and presumably bending
frequencies) that occur for these two couples. Essentially no change in
M-N vibrational frequencies occurs for [Fe(bipy)3]3+/2+ while the
frequency change for [Co(bipy)3]3+/2+ couple amounts to an average of
-130 cm'1.
The insight gained from the calculations for intramolecular entropy
changes has enabled rough estimates to be made for the entropy changes
that occur for gas-phase electron attachment to the transition metal
/3-diketonate complexes investigated in this study.
CHAPTER 5
METAL-LIGAND BOND ENERGIES AND SOLVATION ENERGIES
FOR GAS-PHASE TRANSITION METAL TRIS(ACETYLACETONATE
COMPLEXES AND THEIR ANIONS
Introduction
There have been several attempts to determine the average
homolytic and heterolytic M-O bond energies in M(acac)3 complexes. The
most reliable are obtained through a thermochemical cycle based on the
enthalpy of hydrolysis of the complexes, obtained by using reaction
calorimetry. In the auxiliary thermochemical data required in the
cycle, the value for the homolytic bond enthalpy of the enolic O-H bond
in acetylacetone introduces the greatest uncertainty, since no
experimental data is available. From the results of thermal gas-phase
charge-transfer reactions involving acac' ions presented here, and the
proton affinity of acac" previously reported, a new estimate can be made
of this bond energy. From the original reaction calorimetry data,
better estimates can then be made for the average M-O homolytic and
heterolytic bond energies for M(acac)3 complexes. This data, combined
with the gas-phase electron attachment data for the M(acac)3 complexes
and the free gas-phase ion, leads to the average heterolytic bond
energies in the corresponding M(acac)3" ions.
Several of the M(acac)3 complexes for which electron attachment
data were obtained also exhibit reversible electrochemical behavior for
one electron reduction. From E^2 data, estimates can be made of single
electrode potentials. Comparison with the gas-phase data leads to the
change in solvation energy for M(acac)30/" couples. Reliable data for
solvation energies of complex metal ions are very scarce, yet are
84
85
essential for a complete understanding of the thermodynamics of redox
processes at coordinated metal centers. Consideration of the relative
contributions of the changes in solvation energies and bond energies
that occur for electron attachment to M(acac)3 complexes provides an
overall appreciation of how ionization potentials of M+3(g) ions are
related to the magnitude of a particular M(acac)30/' redox couple.
Electron Attachment Energy Relationships
The general thermochemical cycle in Figure 5-1 is the basis for
most of the thermochemical results presented in this report. The cycle
shows the general thermochemical relationships between thermodynamic
functions Ax for M-L bond formation or solvation of a complex and
electron attachment thermodynamics (AXg°) for a metal ion in essentially
three physically different environments (reactions a, b and c) at a
given temperature. A cycle of this type and crude estimates of the
various thermodynamic quantities were discussed by Buckingham and
Sargeson some 25 years ago.35 In reaction (a), electron attachment is
to a metal ion M with charge z in the free gaseous state, Mz(g). In
(b), electron attachment is to the gas-phase complex [MLy]n(g) of charge
n in which the metal ion M is equivalently ligated by anionic ligands
(L"). In (c) the solvated metal complex is reduced to [MLy]n_1 (soln) .
For the M(acac)3 complexes considered here, L=acac, Y = 3, z = +3, and
n = 0.
In the upper part of Figure 5-1, labelled I, the difference in
AXg° for the electron attachment reactions (a) and (b), given by
AXg°[Mz(g) ] and AXa°[MLyn(g) ] , are thermochemically related to the
difference in Ax° for heterolytic cleavage of the the metal-ligand bonds
for the oxidized and reduced form of the complex, AXhet°[(M-Ly)n] and
AXhet°( (M-Ly)(n'1)). A similar cycle can be used to derive AAXhom°( (M-Ly) ]
values for homolytic bond dissociation.
AXa° Mn(g)
(a) Mz(g) + (YxL“)(g) + e
AXhet° (M-U)n
(b) MLYn(g) + e'
AXa°(MLYn(g))
AX„,V°(MLV")
(c) MLYn(soln) + e'
AXa°(MLYn(soln))
M("1)(g) + (YxL-)(g)
AXh
MLY("-'>(g)
AX^/CMLy'"-â€)
MLY^â€"(soln)
Figure 5-1. Thermochemical cycle relating thermodynamic functions Ax for electron attachment
processes (reactions a, b and c) and heterolytic bond energies and solvation energies for the
complexes MLy and MLy’.
87
In the part of the cycle labelled II the difference in AXa° for the
electron attachment reactions AXa°[MLyn(g) ] and AXa°[MLyn( soln) ] is
thermochemically related to the difference between AX° for solvation of
the oxidized and reduced forms of the complex (AXgotv°[MLyn] and
AXsolv°tMLY
Experimental results for reaction (b) usually involve the
ionization of a neutral or electron attachment to a neutral. To
incorporate the energies for these processes into thermochemical cycles,
the values must be determined under thermal conditions. Such data can
be obtained by using mass spectrometry through studies of electron-
transfer equilibrium reactions and are often used to estimate the
adiabatic ionization energies or the electron affinities of polyatomic
species (these quantities are strictly the differences between the heats
of formation of the neutral and its ion at 0 K) as discussed in chapter
3. The method can be applied equally well to reactions involving
positive or negative ions, but such data for metal complexes is scarce.
Vertical ionization data are more widely available for volatile metal
complexes from studies of ionization appearance potentials and
photoelectron spectroscopy (PES) .56.131.132 The energy difference between
the adiabatic and vertical processes can be relatively small if the
geometry of the neutral is similar to that of the ion. For example, the
adiabatic ionization energy for ferrocene has recently been estimated as
6.69 eV by FTICR133 (Mautner134 suggests 6.81 eV from pulsed high
pressure mass spectrometry studies), while the vertical IP value
obtained from PES is 6.88 eV.135
Significant differences between adiabatic and vertical energies
may arise, however, when geometry changes upon electron attachment or
ionization are significant, and such substantial rearrangements are
common in transition metal complex redox chemistry. For example, the
adiabatic ionization energy of manganocene is '6.2 eV, 136,133 while the
vertical ionization energy obtained for the high-spin state by PES is
88
17p
7.0 eV. For metal complexes, therefore, vertical ionization data can
only be used in thermochemical cycles such as Figure 5-1 for those cases
where it is known, or can be reasonably assumed, that the geometries of
the neutral and the ion are not too dissimilar. It should be noted that
even if the 0-0 transition energy (the adiabatic energy) can be obtained
from the PES spectrum, a statistical mechanical calculation must be used
to derive enthalpy, entropy, and free energy changes at a given
temperature. Spectroscopic data needed for such calculations are often
unavailable or incomplete for transition metal complexes. On the other
hand, electron-transfer equilibrium studies provide data that can be
used directly in thermochemical calculations involving ionizations and
electron attachments near room temperature.
Combining gas-phase electron attachment energies with other
thermochemical data. In order to combine thermal gas-phase electron
attachment energy data for M(acac)3 complexes with other thermochemical
data it is useful to know the temperature dependence of Kgq (eq 2-2)
since such data leads to values of As ° and Ah °. Estimates of AG ° at
ad a
other temperatures can then be made. From the conclusions drawn from
chapter 4 concerning the magnitudes of ASa° for gas-phase coordination
compounds, a maximum value of ASa° = 20 cal mol'1 K'1 for the reaction
Co(acac)3(g) + e' -» Co(acac)3'(g) is assumed. The value for AHg° at 298
K is *7 kcal mol"1 higher than AGg° at 350 K (assuming AHg° is
independent of temperature). For the other M(acac)30/* couples where
less change in vibrational and electronic entropies occur, ASg° should
be smaller and similar to the values reported for organic compounds.
Values for the total metal-ligand heterolytic bond dissociation
enthalpies for M(acac)3 complexes (AHhet°[M-(acac)3)) of the first
transition metal series are found to be *1300 kcal mol'1 (see discussion
below). Since values of AGa° at 350 K and AHg° at 298 K for M(acac)3
complexes may differ by several kcal mol'1 in the worst case, the
percentage error introduced into derived values of AHhet°[(M-(acac)3*) ]
89
using the approximation AGa° (350 K) = AHa° (298 K) is small, since these
bond enthalpies have values in the range of “600-650 kcal mol’1 (see
below). When quoting an average energy per M-0 bond, AXhet°(M-0), the
error introduced by assuming AGg0 = AHg° is probably < 1 kcal mol’1 for
all cases .
As discussed above, throughout this dissertation the stationary
electron convention is adopted, which assigns a heat capacity and an
entropy of zero to the free electron. Under this convention the values
of AHa° for monoatomic ions at O K apply at all temperatures, since the
heat capacities of Mz and M(z'1) are always equal. Therefore, values of
AHa° M+3(g) are given by the negative value of the third ionization
potential for the metal. The stationary electron convention is adopted
to maintain consistency with the original AGg° values quoted for the
organic reference compounds on which the results presented in this
dissertation are based.
From cycle II of Figure 5-1, AGg° M(acac)3(g) data can be compared
with AGa° for the same process in solution to yield the difference
between the solvation free energies of a M(acac)3 neutral and its anion.
Values of AGa° M(acac)3(soln) can be estimated from electrochemical E1/2
values for M(acac)30,/* couples (see discussion below). Assuming
AGa°[M(acac)3(g)] data at 350 K is valid at other temperatures again
introduces an approximation, but using the upper limit of "20 cal mol’1
K’1 for Asa°, the error introduced in quoting values of
AAGsolv°[M(acac)30/’] at 298 K is again typically < 1 kcal mol*1.
In the thermochemical cycle used in this work to obtain values for
the bond dissociation enthalpies for M(acac)3 and M(acac)3* complexes a
value for AHa° at 298 K for acac1 radical is needed. The value obtained
from the gas-phase studies is a free energy, but ASa° is expected to be
typically small as observed for other organic compounds, especially
since the geometries of acac- and acac’ are probably quite similar.
90
Homolvtic and Heterolvtic M-O Bond Enthalpies in M(acac),(q)
Complexes and M(acac)-,'(g) Ions
The difference in the total heterolytic or homolytic metal-ligand bond
dissociation enthalpies between any M(acac)3 complex and its negative
ion can be obtained from the relationships in eg 5-1.
AAHhet°[M“(acac>30/'] s AHhet°[M-(acac)3] - AHhet°[M-(acac)3']
= AHa°[M+3(g)] - AHa°[M(acac)3(g) ] 5-1 (a)
AAHhom°rM-30/'] H AHhom° tM_ (acac) 31 " AHhom0[M-(acac)3']
= AHa°[M(g)] - AHa°[M(acac)3(g) ] 5-1 (b)
Values for the electron attachment energies required for eq 5-1 are
given in Table 5-1. Before deriving the average bond dissociation
enthalpies for the gas-phase M(acac)3' ions by using eqs 5-1 (a) and 5-1
(b), the available data for the corresponding neutral bond enthalpies
was critically assessed. Inaccurate assumptions made in the literature
derivations required us to generate new experimental data and thereby
revise the published enthalpies as discussed in the following.
For M(acac)3 complexes the average homolytic metal-oxygen bond
enthalpy, AHhom°(M-0), can be found from the thermochemical cycle in
Figure 5-2. The relationship between the various thermochemical values
is given in eq 5-2.
AHhom°(M-°) = 1/6 < 3AHf°(Hacac (1) ) + 3AHvap°(Hacac) + 3AHhom°(H-acac)
+ AHsub°(M> †AHf°[M(acac)3(c)] - AHsub°[M(acac)3] - 3/2AHf°[H(g) ] ?-2
In Figure 5-2, AHvap°(Hacac) is the enthalpy of vaporization of
acetylacetone and AHsub°[M(acac)3] and AHsub°(M) are enthalpies of
sublimation of M(acac)3 and the metal M, respectively. The relationship
3D(H-acac)
-3/2 AH,°(H,g)
3/2 H2(g) + M(acac)3(g)
AHlub0(M(acac)j)
M(acac)3(c)
AHf°(M(acac)3)
3 H—acac
(enol)(g)
M(g)
AH °(Hacac)
AH.ub°(M)
3 Hacac(l)
M(c)
3 x AHf°(Hacac)
M(c) + 15 C(c) + 3 02(g) + 10.5 H2(g) 15 C(c) + 3 02(g) + 12 H2(g)
VO
Figure 5-2. Thermochemical cycle used to determine the enthalpies of formation of M(acac)3 complexes.
92
Table 5-1. Free Energies of Electron Attachment (kcal mol'1) to
Hlacacl-, complexes and Enthalpies of Electron Attachment to Free M*3 (a)
ions ana M(q).
M
AGa°[M(acac)3(g)]a
AHa°[M+3(g)]b
AHa°[M(g);
Ti
< 0
-633.53
-5(5)
V
-24.9
± 0.5
-675.45
-12(5)
Cr
-20 ±
1
-713.5
-15(1)
Mn
-59 ±
3
-775.9
> 0
Fe
-43.0
± 0.5
-706.35
-5.8(4.6)
Co
-47 ±
2
-772.0
-16(5)
Ru
-38.7
± 0.5
-656.1
-25(7)
aAll values taken from Table 1-2 (temperature = 350 K)
^Values given are negative of the third ionization potentials of the
metals taken from ref. 137. Conversion factor = 23.065 Real mol’1
= 1 eV
cElectron affinity data for atomic metals taken from ref. 138. Number
in parenthesis is the uncertainty in the last figure(s).
93
between AHhom°(M-0) and the average heterolytic metal oxygen bond
enthalpy, AHhet°(M-0), is given in eq 5-3.
AHh°et(M-0) -
6 AHhom (M-0)
¿iIP(M) + 3AHa°(acac-)
i-i
5-3
The summation term in eq 5-3 is the sum of the first three ionization
potentials for the metal M. Values for Ah^° for M(acac)3 complexes of
the first transition metal series are available in the literature from
the results of Wood and Jones using bomb calorimetry139 and from the
results of reaction calorimetry.140'143 Reaction calorimetry is
considered to be the more reliable method for M(acac)3 compounds,144,1413
and this technique has been applied to M(acac)3 complexes of interest
here for M = Cr, Mn, Fe and Co.141,142 Reaction calorimetry has been
used by Ribeiro Da Silva and co-workers to determine values of AHf° and
AHh0m0(M-O) for other tris J3-diketonate complexes, and the application of
the technique to transition metal J3-diketonates has been reviewed.141
Their work included a reappraisal of of the values of AHf° and
AHhom°(M-0) derived from the original reaction calorimetry studies, and
the values have been revised here using the latest values of the
auxiliary thermochemical data required for their determination.
The two values that introduce the greatest uncertainty in derived
bond enthalpies for the M(acac)3 complexes are the values of the gas-
phase homolytic bond dissociation enthalpy of the O-H bond in the enol
form of acetylacetone (AHhom°(H-acac) in eq 5-2) and the enthalpy of
sublimation of the M(acac)3 complex. Values for AHsub°[M(acac)3] are
difficult to measure precisely for compounds of relatively low
volatility such as M(acac)3 complexes. For example, values for AHS(jb°
for Cr(acac)3 quoted in the literature range from 6.64 kcal mol'1, used
in the bomb calorimetry study of Wood and Jones,139 to 33.8 kcal mol'1
obtained more recently from differential scanning calorimetry.145 The
apparent unreliability of the values of AHsub°[M(acac)3] used in the
94
earlier work was recognised in the reappraisal by Ribiero Da Silva and
co-workers.142 From a review of the results available in the
literature,143 the values of AHsub°[M(acac)3] chosen by these workers were
in the range of '28-33 kcal mol"1. The same values were used in this
report and are given in Table 5-2 along with the other auxiliary data
used in Figure 5-2.
No experimental values have been available for the value of
AHhom0(H-acac), and values used previously have been estimated. The
difficulty of assessing the contributions to the relative stability of
acetylacetone due to intramolecular hydrogen bonding in the enol form
and the effects of electronic delocalization in the acetylacetonate
radical has led to estimated values ranging from 87-110 kcal mol"1.139,144
A value of AHhom°(H-acac) can be obtained from the gas-phase proton
affinity (Ahra) of acac",146 AHg° of acac- and the ionization potential of
H atom.137 The relationship is given by eq 5-4.
AHhon,°(H“acac) = AHpA(acac") - IP(H(g)) - AHa°(acac) 5-4
Substituting the available data from the literature and AHg° for acac*
determined in this report (Table 5-2) into eq 5-4 yields a value of
AHhom°(H-acac) of 90 ± 5 kcal mol'1.
The new value for the AHhom°(H-acac) combined with the reaction
calorimetry data leads to new values of AHhom°(M-0) and AHhet°(M-0) for
the M(acac)j complexes of Cr, Mn, Fe and Co, and these values are given
in Table 5-3. Also given in Table 5-3 are the values of
AAHhet°[M-(acac)30/" ] , obtained from eq 5-1 (a) and the data in Table 5-1.
The resulting AHhet°(M-0) and AHhom°(M-0) values from eqs 5-1 (a) and 5-1
(b) for the M(acac)3" anions are listed in Table 5-3.
The results for the average M-O heterolytic bond energies obtained
in this report (Table 5-3) are shown graphically in Figure 5-3 (diamond
points). The heterolytic bond dissociation enthalpies for the M(III)
95
neutral complexes are approximately twice the values of those for the
M(II) anions. Interestingly, this approximate factor of 2 is also found
in comparing the heats of hydration of M3+ and M2+ ions122,147 as well as
the mean heterolytic bond dissociation enthalpies of the M(III)
metallocenium ions and M(II) metallocenes, [Cp2M]+(g) and Cp2M(g).133 On
the basis of these limited comparisons, the ratio of average heterolytic
bond energies for these types of M(III) and M(II) complexes seems to be
associated more with the formal oxidation states of the metal than with
the charges on the complexes or the natures of the ligands.
The results in Table 5-3 indicate that the mean homolytic bond
dissociation enthalpies for the metal(II) anions are in all cases higher
than the values for the metal(III) complexes. Thermochemically, this
result can be traced to the higher electron affinities of the neutral
complexes compared to the free metal atoms (Table 5-1). The trends in
homolytic bond energies for metal complexes will generally be less
intuitive than found for organic compounds because significant
electronic rearrangements can occur upon bond formation in the metal
complexes. As expected, heterolytic energies follow a far more
predictable trend when the metal oxidation state is varied.
Although it may be considered that the results in Table 5-3 for
the M-0 bond dissociation enthalpies of the neutral M(acac)3 complexes
are more reliable, also shown in Figure 5-3 are the results for the
complexes taken directly from the published bomb calorimetry study139
(upper plot, circle points), which included an estimated value for
Ti(acac)j. The corresponding values for the M(acac)3" anions derived
from them are also shown (lower plot, circle points). The new values of
AHhet0(M-0) (triangles, Figure 5-3) are lower than those derived from
bomb calorimetry results because of the lower value used for
AHhom0(H-acac) and a more highly exothermic value for AHa°(acac') (a
value of -34 kcal mol'1 was used previously). The calculated values
using the bomb calorimetry results139 provide an illustration of the
96
l_
O
E
o
(J
O
o>
Figure 5-3. Average heterolytic M-0 bond energies for M(acac)3
complexes and M(acac)3' ions. Upper plot (circles) are results from an
early report using bomb calorimetry. Upper plot (diamonds) are results
from this work. The lower plot shows the corresponding values for
M(acac)3' ions. The trends from each study follow the classical double
periodic variation with relative minima occuring for d° and d5 metal
ions (Sc and Fe upper, Mn lower).
97
Table 5-2. Auxiliary thermochemical data (kcal mol'1) for M(acac)3 complexes
and acetvlacetone.
Cr
Mn
Fe
Co
AHsub° tM Ãacac) 31
29.4 ± 0.7a
28.7 ± 2.4a
32.3 ± 2.4a
28.2 ±
1.2b
AHsub°
94.79 ± 1.0C
67.09 ± 1.0C
99.50 ± 1.0C
101.5 ±
O
O
rH
AHf°( complex)
-374.0 ± 2.1a
-329.6 ± 0.9a
-314.2 ± 0.7a
-294.9 ±
0.9b
AlWH-acac)
AGa°(acac‘)
AHvap°
AHf°(Hacac, 1)
AHf°(H,g)
90 ± 5d
-59 ± 3d
9.99 ± 0.05e
-101.7 ± 0.3f
52.104 ± 0.003c
aTaken from ref. 141.
bTaken from ref. 142.
cTaken from ref. 148.
dFrom this work, see text.
eTaken from ref. 149.
fTaken from ref. 150.
98
Table 5-3. Average metal-oxygen bond energy data fkcal mol ^) for gas-phase
M(acac), complexes and Miacac',' anions.
M
AAHheto/- a
[M-(acac)3u/ ]a
AHhom°(M-°)
M(acac)3
AHhet°(M-0)
M(acac)3
AHhet0(M-0)
M(acac)j
JV":0-1
M(acac)3
V
651
“
Cr
694
46
+
3b
Mn
717
34
±
3b
Fe
663
37
+
3b
Co
725
34
+
3b
Ru
617
225
+
5C
109
±
8
47
+
3'
223
+
5C
103
±
8
>
44
217
±
5C
107
±
8
43
±
3'
230
±
5C
108
±
8
39
±
4'
aValue obtained from eg 5-3 and gas-phase electron attachment data given in
Table 5-1.
dalue obtained from reaction calorimetry data in refs. 141 and 142 corrected
for value of AHhom°(H-acac)(g)) (see text).
cValue obtained using AHa° of acac from this work.
determined from value of AHhom°(M-0) using eg 5-1 (b)
99
formation of a part of the classic double periodic variation.147® This
trend is generally observed for heterolytic bond energies for M+3 and M+2
complex ions of the first transition metal series. The relative minima
at Sc and Fe for the neutral complexes, joined by a dashed line,
correspond to the d° and d5 configurations for which the crystal field
stabilization energy is zero.122,147a An analogous rationale applies to
the trend observed for the M(acac)3" anions, where the d5 configuration
for M(acac)3‘ anions occurs for Mn and a minimum value is again
observed.
Relative Solvation Energies of M(acac)-,(q) and M( acac )(q)
The difference in AGsolv° values between a M(acac)3 complex and its
anion (AAGsolv°[M(acac)307" ] )* is defined by eq 5-5, and applies to the
reaction in eq 5-6.
AAGsolv°[M
M(acac)3(soln) + M(acac)3*(g) -» M(acac)3(g) + M(acac)3'(soln) 5-6
Thermodynamic data for reversible electron attachment to electroactive
species in solution are normally given as standard electrode potentials
(E° values), measured relative to the standard hydrogen electrode (SHE).
For many species this data can be conveniently estimated from E1/2
values, measured against a reference electrode, by using, for example,
polarography or cyclic voltammetry. In order to be able to directly
compare E1/2 data obtained for M(acac)307‘ couples to the corresponding
*The term AAGgolv0 [M(acac)3®7'] is intended to represent the free energy
change occurinq in the redox couple M(acac)3°7' and not the quantity
AGsolv°[M(acac)3 1 †AGsolv°[M(acac)3 "1 ' wh:*-ch “as the opposite sign.
100
gas-phase AGg° values, the zero of potential for the "free" electron in
reactions b and c of Figure 5-1 must be set to the same reference state.
Adopting the stationary electron convention, as done for gas-phase AGg°
values, defining "absolute" magnitudes of electron attachment energies
in solution requires that the potential of the reference electrode be
redefined on this absolute scale (to yield an Eabg°(ref) value). The
absolute electron attachment energy for M(acac)3 complexes in solution
(AGa°[M(acac)3(soln)] is then estimated by eq 5-7, where F is the
Faraday constant.
AGa°[M(acac)3)(soln)] = F {E1/2[M(acac)30/'] + Eabs°(ref)} 5-7
With a value for AGa°[M(acac)3) (soln) ], a value for AAGsolv°[M(acac)30/‘]
can be obtained from eq 5-8, as illustrated by cycle II in Figure 5-1.
AAGsotv°[M30/'} = AGa°[M(acac)3) (soln) ] - AGa°[M(acac)3) (g) ] 5-8
The absolute value of the electrochemical potential of a galvanic
half-cell is thermodynamically related to single ion solvation energies.
Although relative single ion solvation energies are readily obtainable
from Born cycles and emf measurements, the absolute contribution from
each ion to the solvation energy of ± ion pairs is difficult to
evaluate. There have been attempts to estimate the absolute value of
the enthalpy and free energy of hydration of the proton. 151-155,94-98 A
variety of different methods have been used, which have been categorized
into three groups by Haliwell and Nyburg,153 and the various methods
that have led to literature values for the thermodynamics of H+
solvation have been critically reviewed by Conway.156 A recent value
for the free energy of hydration of the proton of -260.0 ± 0.5 kcal
mol’1 has been provided by Farrell and McTigue,96 based on measurements
of volta potential differences. This method has the advantage that it
101
provides the most direct method for the determination of "real" free
energies of solvation of ions, and intrinsically includes the work
required to pass a charge across the surface potential (Ax) that exists
at the surface of liquids. This work is not included in the values of
AHsolv° or AGsolv° obtained by applying "physical model" approaches,153,156
and such values are termed "chemical" free energies of hydration. A
drawback of the volta potential method is that the reference state of
the electron is stationary at a point in a vacuum close to the surface
of the solution, under the influence of the volta potential of the
solution (Ys). As shown by Trasatti,157 an amount of work equal to zFYs
must be done to move the electron away to field free space (the
reference state used to define single ion solvation energies in accord
with the stationary electron convention). The magnitude of this work is
uncertain. As no experimental procedure has directly led to the single
ion solvation free energy of the proton with the necessary free electron
reference state, one is left with choosing a value based on a method for
which the assumptions and principles are the least unsatisfactory.
The value of AGhyd° (H+) quoted by Farrell and McTigue is in good
go
agreement with an earlier determination by the same method by Randles,
and is not dissimilar to estimated values based on physical models.
154 This value has been used by Heinis and co-workers14 and by Shalev
and Evans20 in a cycle similar to II in Figure 5-1 to determine the
solvation energies of a variety of quiñones and nitrobenzenes. Adopting
the recommended value156 for AGhyd° (H+) allows the absolute potential of
the standard hydrogen electrode to be evaluated,94'98,155,157 and a value
of -102.6 kcal mol'1 (4.44 eV) is obtained as the absolute potential for
the SHE. Values for Eabs°(ref) based on this scale are used with E^2
data in eqs 5-7 and 5-8 to obtain values for AGa°[M(acac)3) (soln) ] and
AAGsolv°[M30/']-
102
Table 5-4. Polaroqraphic Data and Solvation Free Energies of M(acac),^
complexes in various solvents.
M(acac)30/"
Couple
e1/23 AGa°[M(acac)3(soln) ]b AAGsolv°[M(acac)30/']b
Acetonitrile
Cr
-1.81c
-66.3
-46
Ru
-0.70d
-91.3
-52
Fe
-0.67c
-92.6
-50
Co
-0.34e
-100.0
-53
Mn
-0.09f
-110.6
-52
Dimethylsulfoxide
V
-1.429
-75.2
-50
Dichloromethane
Ru
-0.71d
-91.1
-52
Water
Ru
-0.51h
-96.2
-58
(-75')
aValues given in volts measured using 0.1 M TEAP as supporting
electrolyte against SCE, except d, n-BuNBF, Vs Ag/AgCl and h, see ref
158.
Valúes given in kcal mol'1, obtained from egs 5-9 and 5-10.
cTaken from ref. 159.
dTaken from ref. 160
eTaken from ref. 161.
*Taken from ref. 162
sTaken from ref. 163.
hTaken from ref. 158.
'Value of single ion solvation free energy in water.
103
Polarographic data are given in Table 5-4 for the reversible
electrochemical reduction of several M(acac)3 complexes in acetonitrile
cited from various literature sources. To facilitate comparison, data
are quoted wherever possible from results obtained under common
electrochemical conditions (acetonitrile with 0.1 M tetraethylammonium
perchlorate as supporting electrolyte). For V(acac)3, however, E1/2 data
is only available for DMSO as the solvent. To allow a comparison of
solvation free energies in different solvents, data for the reduction of
Ru(acac)3 in dichloromethane and water are included. The E1/2 data lead
to values of AGg0[ (M(acac)3) (soln) ) and AAGsoiv°[M(acac)30/‘], which are
also included in Table 5-4. The accuracies of these values are
difficult to assess since they rely on the value chosen for the single
ion solvation energy of the proton and the approximation of E1/2 to true
E° values. Unfortunately, due to the low solubility of M(acac)3
complexes in water, the latter approximation is made worse for the
majority of the data in Table 5-4, since the E1/2 values quoted are
measured in non-aqueous solvents against an aqueous reference electrode.
Consequently any junction potential that exists at the solvent/reference
electrode interface will be included in the observed E1/2 values. This
problem was minimized by Shalev and Evans20 in obtaining AAGsolv° values
for organic compounds by including a cobaltocenium/cobaltocene internal
standard. The absolute standard potential of this Cp2Co couple was
assumed to be largely solvent independent as is assumed for the Cp2Fe+/0
couple, but this assumption is known to be somewhat unsatisfactory
because of different solvent ordering effects for various polar
solvents.16^ The value of AAGsolv°[Ru (acac)3] obtained in water, however,
may be considered to be a reasonable estimate since junction potentials
are minimized and E^2 will closely approximate E°.
Figure 5-4 shows a plot of gas-phase AGa°[M(acac)3(g)] values
versus AGa°[M(acac)3(soln)] values in acetonitrile for the M(acac)3
complexes for which data are available (Tables 5-1 and 5-4). The value
104
Figure 5-4. Plot of electron attachment energies for M(acac)j complexes
in the gas-phase versus the estimated values in acetonitrile. The
electron attachment energy for V(acac)3 in the gas-phase versus in DMSO
is also shown.
105
V Cr Mn Fe Co
Figure 5-5. Plot showing periodic trends of electron attachment
energies in the gas-phase and in solution. Solution-phase data are for
acetonitrile (circles) and DMSO (star).
106
for V(acac)3 is also shown since E1/2 values for M(acac)3 complexes in
DMSO are typically similar to those in acetonitrile, generally being
some < 100 mV or so more positive. As can be seen, there is a strong
linear correlation between the two data sets. The slope of the best fit
line is close to unity (1.1), indicating that differential solvation
energies for M(acac)30^" couples are essentially constant (Table 5-4).
It should be noted that this conclusion is independent of the choice of
the absolute electrode potential. The same data is presented in Figure
5-5 as a periodic trend to illustrate the relative magnitudes of
electron attachment energies in the gas-phase and in solution.
It is interesting to compare the experimental values of
AAGsolv°[M(acac)30/‘] in Table 5-4 to the values predicted from dielectric
continuum theory. The Born equation12** predicts the change in
electrostatic free energy AGel° when a charge is transferred from a
conducting sphere of effective (thermochemical) radius re^ in a vacuum,
to a sphere of equal radius in a medium of dielectric constant D. A
convenient form of the equation for ions in solution is given in eq 5-9.
AGel° = - (166zz/reff) (1 - 1/D) kcal mol'1 5-9
In eq 5-9, z is the integral units of electronic charge and D is the
dielectric constant of the solvent. It can be seen from the above
definition that the Born equation applies to the process in eq 5-6, and
therefore AGel° can be related directly to AAGgoiv°. The Born equation
includes "chemical" single ion free energies of solvation, since the
work of transferring an ion across the surface of the solvent is not
considered. The additional work is probably small however, when
compared with typical values of AAGgolv0,157 and so useful comparisons may
still be made to the AAGgolv°[M(acac)30/'] obtained in this work.
Using the value of AAGsolv°[Ru(acac)30/‘] of 57.5 kcal mol"1 in
water, the Born equation gives a value of reff of 2.9 Ã, while the
107
maximum radius for Ru(acac)30/' is expected to be ' 6 k, the maximum
radius of Ru(acac)3.^5 The smaller Born thermochemical radius, compared
to the crystallographic radius, is not unexpected since the molecular
shapes and charge distributions in the M(acac)30/’ couple are poorly
approximated by neutral and charged spheres. The tris chelate
coordination environment can allow the first solvation layer to
penetrate the "6 k sphere based on the distance between metal center and
methyl hydrogens. The relative extents to which solvent penetration and
specific solvation of the polar metal-ligand interactions influence the
solvation energies cannot be deduced from the present results. It is
notable that the deduced AAGsolv°[Ru(acac)30/'] values for dichloromethane
and acetonitrile solvents are 6 kcal mol'1 lower than the value for
water. Given the approximations inherent in the method used, however,
this magnitude of difference could arise from either actual variations
in solvation free energies for the nonagueous vs. water solvents or
errors introduced by the electrochemical potential determinations.
Single ion solvation free energies for M(acac)3' ions can be
obtained from AAG^^tMiacac)^’ ] values, provided that the solvation
energy for the gas-phase neutral is known (eq 5-7). The solvation free
energy for the neutral can be obtained from the relationship
AGsolv°[M3
the term AGsoln°[M(acac)3(c) ] is the free energy of solution of
crystalline M(acac)3. Values of AG$ub° are not available from the
literature, but estimates can be obtained from AHsub°[M(acac)3(c)] by
assuming that ASsub°[M(acac)3(c) ] is equal to the translational entropy
of the vapor produced. Translational entropies can be predicted quite
accurately from the Sackur-Tetrode equation (see chapter 3). For
compounds such as M(acac)3 complexes, for which the crystal lattice is
held by essentially Van der Vaals forces, estimated values of AGS(jb° are
expected to be quite reliable (for example, the experimental value of
Assub° ^or naPhthalene is 40.3 cal mol"1 K'1 while the Sackur-Tetrode
108
equation predicts Astrang° for naphthalene to be 40.5 cal mol"1 K"1).
Considering the Ru(acac)3 couple, from an estimated value of AHgub° of
34 ± 3 kcal mol'1, based on the values for other M(acac)3 complexes,
together with an estimated value of ASgub°[Ru(acac)3(c) ] of 43.8 cal
mol’1 K'1, a value of AGS(jb° of 21 ± 3 kcal mol"1 is obtained. A value of
^Gsoln° 3.1 kcal mol"1 for Ru(acac)3(c) in water can be calculated from
its solubilty,158 which gives AGgolv° of Ru(acac)3(g) in water of -17.7 ±
3 kcal mol"1. Combining these data with AAGgolv°[Ru (acac)30/" ] in water
(Table 5-4) gives AGg0^v°[Ru (acac)3" (g) ] of -75 ± 10 kcal mol"1.
The vertical ionization energies of several ruthenium tris(fl-
diketonates) have been combined with polarographic data by other workers
to obtain information about relative solvation energies.165 For these
Ru compounds, the ionization is from a metal-based approximately non¬
bonding orbital, and the PES data may be jusifiably used in place of the
adiabatic values with relatively small errors.
Relative Solvation Energies of RuftfacUfg) and RufhfacWfq)
and Their Negative Ions
Many ruthenium tris(fi-diketonates) are stable with respect to
reversible one electron electrochemical reduction and E1/2 values for
these complexes have been reported for a variety of 8-diketonate ligands
by using cyclic voltammetry.72'76 The estimates obtained in the present
work for gas-phase AGa° values for the complexes Ru(hfac)3, Ru(tfac)3 and
Ru(acac)3 can be combined with the appropriate electrochemical data to
yield values of AAGgotv° for the redox couples Ru(tfac)3°7’ and
Ru(hfac)30/", and AGg°[Ru (tf ac) 3 ( soln) ] and AGa°[ Ru (hf ac )3 ( soln) ] , as was
done above for Ru(acac)3 and the other M(acac)3 complexes. Data for E1/2
values in acetonitrile are available for these complexes and so the
values obtained may be compared to the related data in Table 5-4. For
Ru(tfac)3, values of 38 kcal mol'1 for AAGsolv0[Ru(tfac)07'] and 102 kcal
J
109
mol"1 for AGa°[Ru(tfac)3(soln)] are obtained. For Ru(hfac)3 values of 30
kcal mol"1 for AAGsolv°[Ru(hfac)0/" ] and 119 kcal mol"1
AGa°[Ru(hfac)3(soIn)] are obtained. The values of AAGsolv° steadily
decrease for the series Ru(acac)3, Ru(tfac)3, Ru(hfac)3 as the degree of
fluorination of the ligand increases. The AGa°(soln) versus AGg°(g) data
for the three complexes are plotted in Figure 5-6 in the same way as was
done for the M(acac)3 complexes in Figure 5-4. The slope of the line is
0.55 for the series of ruthenium complexes, which can be compared to the
value of 1.1 for the series of M(acac)3 complexes. The smaller value
reflects the decreasing solvation energy of the Ru(fi-diketonate)3 anions
with increasing fluorination.
This result is analogous to the observation made for a series of
substituted benzo-, naptho- and anthraguinones that the greater the
electron attachment energy, the smaller the corresponding increase in
the E1/2° value.14,15 It was noted that the compounds with greater
electron attachment energies are those more able to delocalize the
negative charge. By the same argument however, this leads to a
correspondingly lower solvation energy, as predicted by dielectric
continuum models.124 A plot of E1/2 versus AGa°(g) values for the organic
acceptors led to curvature in the slope line at higher energies with the
slope of the line becoming less than unity.
An analogous rationale can be applied to the difference in the
slope of the AGa°(soln) versus AGa°(g) values for the M(acac)3 and Ru(B-
diketonate)3 complexes. For the M(acac)3‘ ions the distribution of
negative charge is probably affected little by the nature of the metal,
which accounts for the relatively constant value of AAGso1v° obtained for
the series of M(acac)30/" redox couples. For the series of Ru tris(B-
diketonate) complexes the negative inductive effect (-1) of the fluorine
atoms will serve to delocalize the negative charge. The resultant
effect is that the gas-phase electron attachment energies increase with
AGa°(Ru(/3—diketonate)3(soln))
(kcal mol-1)
no
—AGa°(Ru(/S—diketonate)3(g))
(kcal mol-1)
Figure 5-6. Plot of electron attachment energies for Ru(J3-diketonate)j
complexes in the gas-phase versus solution (acetonitrile).
Ill
ions decrease. Since the values of f°r t*le couP^es become more
increasing fluorination, while the solvation energies of the negative
positive in value (more strongly oxidizing) with increasing
fluorination, the increase in gas-phase electron attachment energy is
greater than the loss of solvation energy in the redox couples, and this
results in the slope of the line in Figure 5-6 of less than unity.
Conclusions
The availability of free energies of electron attachment for a
series of gas-phase metal tris acetylacetonate complexes has allowed the
first systematic thermochemical evaluation of average bond dissociation
enthalpies as a function of metal and oxidation state in gas-phase
coordination complex ions. The thermal electron-transfer gas-phase
equilibrium method yields free energies of electron attachment (or
ionization) that can be directly incorporated into thermochemical
cycles. Other methods of determining such energies, such as
photoelectron spectroscopy, are less generally useful since transition
metal complexes often undergo large geometry changes upon oxidation or
reduction that can lead to erroneous estimates of thermal electron
attachment or ionization energies. In addition, when combined with
solution electrochemical data, the AGg° values for the gas-phase neutral
complexes have led to the most extensive evaluation to date of
differential solvation energies, AAGsolv°, for transition metal complex
redox couples. In contrast to the results for the
metallocene/metallocenium couples reported elsewhere,133 the Born
charging model does not provide a reasonable estimate of the
differential solvation free energy for the tris chelate complexes
studied here. Although the inadequacy of the Born model combined with
crystallographic radii for predicting solvation free energy changes for
redox processes for many transition metal complexes has been suggested
112
in other contexts (e.g., in attempted fits of optical electron-transfer
phenomena using the dielectric continuum model166), direct
thermochemical evaluation of these effects has been lacking until this
study. Finally, the AAGsoly0 values can be used to derive single ion
solvation free energies for complex ions if the free energy of solvation
for the neutral complex is available.
In considering the data in Tables 5-1, 5-3 and 5-4 it is striking
to note how greatly the the range and magnitude of the electron
attachment energies for the free M3+(g) ions (29.3 - 33.7 eV) are
diminished in corresponding the M(acac)3 complexes (0.9 - 2.6 eV).
Solvation of a gas-phase M(acac)3 complex increases the electron
attachment energy by a relatively constant amount (“2.2 V for
acetonitrile as the solvent). The role of solvation is therefore
somewhat secondary to that of ligation (cycle I in Figure 5-1) in
determining the magnitude of the electrode potential for a particular
M(acac)j0/" redox couple. However, when considered on the scale of
typical free energy changes for homogeneous redox reactions of
transition metal complexes, changes in solvation energies in reactants
and products clearly can have a profound influence on the reaction
thermodynamics. As more gas-phase data become available, a more
complete quantitative understanding of solvation and bond energies in
coordination chemistry will certainly result.
CHAPTER 6
INTERPRETATION OF THE TRENDS IN THE ELECTRON ATTACHMENT
FREE ENERGIES OF THE TRIS(ACETYLACETONATE) AND
TRIS(HEXAFLUOROACETYLACETONATE) COMPLEXES OF THE
METALS Ti-Co USING THE SIMPLE LIGAND FIELD MODEL
Introduction
Previous accounts in the literature that compare periodic trends
in electron attachment energies for series of transition metal ions in a
given coordination environment have been restricted to studies of trends
in electrochemical reduction potentials (E° or E1/2 values), since gas-
phase electron attachment energy data were not then available. In these
early reports, ligand field theory was used to explain the observed
trends in electrochemical reduction potentials. One of the most well
known and continuous series of redox couples is the M(H20)63+72+(aq)
series, where M represents a first row transition metal, and trends in
redox potentials for this series have perhaps received the most
attention in the literature. A close correlation has been demonstrated
between the trends in the third ionization potential of the series of
M(g) ions and the oxidation potentials for the series of M(H20 ) 63+/2+(aq)
couples, after "correction" for ligand field effects in the
complexes.35"37 The difference in absolute magnitudes has also been
quite accurately accounted for by the use of thermochemical cycles that
involve the heterolytic metal-ligand bond energies in the oxidized and
reduced complexes, solvation energies, and an estimate of the absolute
potential of the standard hydrogen electrode. These relationships were
discussed for M(acac)3 complexes in chapter 5.
A more complete understanding of the electronic effects that
determine the magnitudes and trends of electron attachment energies for
113
114
metal complexes could be gained from detailed molecular orbital
calculations, performed on both the oxidized and reduced forms of a
series of complexes. However, the crystal field model, which has
previously been used to explain trends in electrochemical reduction
potentials, is applied here to the trends in gas-phase AGa° values for
the M(acac)3 complexes.
Thermochemical Relationships and Periodic Trends
The amount of energy released when an electron reversibly binds to
a ligated metal ion is dependent on the metal ion and its oxidation
state, the change in the total metal-ligand bond energy, and for
electron attachment in solution, the change in solvation energy. For
complexes with metal-based redox orbitals, the relationship between the
thermodynamic quantities involved is illustrated by the energy cycle in
Figure 5-1. Electron attachment energies for gas-phase metal complexes
obtained from the charge-transfer equilibrium technique described in
this dissertation are free energies. For complexes in solution, data
obtained from polarography using the relationships described in
chapter 5 are also free energies. For X = G (free energy) in Figure
5-1, the difference in electron attachment free energy between a free
ion and a gas-phase complexed ion is given by eq 6-1, and that between a
free ion and a complexed ion in solution by eq 6-2.
AGa°[MLYn(g) ] - AGa°[Mz(g)]= AAGhet°[ (M-LY)n/(n'1) ] 6-1
AGa°(MLYn(soln) ] - AGa°[Mn(g)]= AAGhet°[ (M-LY)n/<"-1> ] - AAGsolv°[ (M-Ly ) n/(n'1 > ]
6-2
In eqs 6-1 and 6-2 the term AAGhet°[ (M-Ly)n/(n'1)) is the difference
between the total heterolytic metal-ligand bond free energies in the
115
oxidized and reduced complex and AAGsol y°[ (M-Ly)n/(n'15 ] is the difference
between the free energies of solvation for the oxidized and the reduced
complex. Substituting MLyn(g) = M(acac)3 for the complexes studied in
the present work into eq 6-1, and separating free energy terms into
enthalpic and entropic contributions, eq 6-1 leads to eq 6-3.
AGa°[M(acac)3(g) ] - AHa°[M+3(g) ] = AAHhet°[M(acac)3(g) ]
- T(ASa°[M(acac)3(g) ]) 6-3
Electron attachment energies for free metal ions are given by the
negative value of the third ionization potential (IP3) of the metal, and
apply to a temperature of absolute zero. Throughout this dissertation,
the stationary electron convention is adopted for dealing with the
thermochemistry of electron attachment to gas-phase species. This
convention, applied to free energies of electron attachment, was
discussed in chapter 3. Under the stationary electron convention the
electron has no heat capacity or entropy, and therefore IP3 and
-AHa°[MLyn(g)] are equivalent at all temperatures.
Since the AGa°[M(acac)3(g) ] values obtained in the present work
are for the metals Ti-Co, from eq 6-3 and Figure 5-1 they can be related
to the values of AHa°[Mz(g)] for the corresponding free ions (Ti+3-Co+3).
Values of -AHa°[M3+(g)] for the metals Ti-Co in Table 5-1 are plotted in
Figure 6-1 (a). The origins of the characteristic trend line are well
established and have been semi-quantitatively discussed by Griffith167
using the Slater-Condon-Shortly model of the electronic structure of
free atoms and ions. In Figure 6-1 (a), the overall increase in
-AHg0[M+3(g)] values with increasing atomic number of the metal is
attributed to the increase in nuclear charge. The variance within the
upward trend is a result of differences in e-/e- exchange and repulsion
energies operating in each M2+/M3+ couple. The abrupt decrease in
116
Figure 6-1. Plot of trends in electron attachment energies. Upper plot
(line a) shows the electron attachment energies for free M+3(g) ions.
Lower plot (line b) shows the electron attachment free energies for the
M(acac), complexes, and the values corrected for liganf field effects
(line c).
117
-AHa(M+3(g)] from Mn3+ to Fe3+ provides a good illustration of these
effects. Forming Mn2+ (d5) from Mn3+ (d^*) results in the single largest
increase in the number of stabilizing electron exchange interactions.
The enhanced stability of the d5 configuration is commonly referred to
as the "special stability of the half-filled shell." On forming Fe2+
(d6) from Fe3+ (d3) the added electron enters a singly occupied orbital
with spin antiparallel to the five electrons already present. The
effect of the electron repulsion cannot be stabilized by exchange
interactions (since there are no other d electrons of the same spin),
and the result is that -AHg is approximately 70 kcal mol'1 less
energetic for Fe3+ than for Mn3+, despite the greater nuclear charge of
Fe3+.
Figure 6-1 (b) shows a plot of the values of AGa°[M(acac)3(g)]
obtained in the present work, which are given in Table 1-1. On
comparison to the plot of AHa°[M+3(g)] values in Figure 6-1 (a), the most
striking difference is that the values of AGa°[M(acac)3(g)] are in the
range of 30 eV less exothermic than the values of AHa°[M+3(g)]. Also,
although the increasing trend in -AHa°(M+3(g)] values from on going from
left-to-right is also discerned in the trend for the complexes, the
range in values is reduced from ~7 eV to ~2eV, coupled with some
prominent differences between the two trend lines.
From the right-hand side of eq 6-3, the difference between
electron attachment energies for AHa°[M+3(g)] and AGa°[M(acac)3(g)] can
be attributed to the terms AAHhet°[M(acac)30/" ] and TASa°[M(acac)3(g) ] .
The entropy change accompanying electron attachment to M(acac)3
complexes was discussed in chapter 4, where some evidence was presented
that suggests that ASa°[M(acac)3(g) ] is probably between 2-20 cal mol'1
K . Hence, as dicussed in chapter 5, the experimental values of
-AGa°[M(acac)3(g)] at "350 K, obtained in the present work, are expected
to be a few kcal mol'1 greater than for -AHa°[M(acac)3(g) ]. This
difference is small compared to the values of AAHhet°[M(acac)30/'] (“700
118
kcal mol'1 see Table 5-3), and so the value of AAHhet°(M(acac)30/'] are
the principle cause of the large difference in electron attachment
energies between the free ions and the complexes. Further, the
irregularity in the periodic variance of AAHhet°[M(acac)30^’] values can
be identified as the major cause of the prominent differences between
the periodic variance of AGa°[M(acac)3(g) ] and AHa°[M+3(g)] values.
Trends in heterolytic M-L bond energies involving transition metal
M3+ and M2+ ions, display a characteristic double periodic variance over
the electronic configurations d°-d10 at the metal center. For example,
Figure 6-2 shows the trends in the enthalpies of hydration (AHhyd°) for
the series of ions Sc3+ - Ga3+ and Ca2+ - Zn2+, which span the electronic
configurations d° - d10. Values for Sc2+, Ni3+, Cu3+ and Zn3+ are unknown.
For both series, a relatively straight line can be drawn through the
points for the d°, d5 and d10 ions. A simple interpretation of the
deviations from a linear increase in AH^0 is provided by the crystal
field model.
The crystal field model. In the crystal field model, the energies
of the degenerate d orbitals in a free transition metal ion are
considered in terms of the perturbing effect of points of negative
electrostatic charge located at the same spatial positions occupied by
ligand donor atoms in complex metal ions. For octahedral ML6 complexes,
the six point charges lie equidistant from the metal ion along the three
cartesian axes. The electrostatic field generated by the six point
charges can be resolved into spherical and octahedral components. As
the point charges are positioned nearer to the metal, the spherical
component of the electrostatic field raises the energy of all the d
orbitals due to a repulsive effect with the negatively charged
electrons. The effect of the octahedral component splits the energy of
the five degenerate d orbitals into two sets. The orbitals of eg
symmetry lie along the cartesian axes and interact more strongly with
(kcal mo
119
1150-3
1100-E
1 050 i
1000Ã
950
900 ^
■>° Ga+3
/
O
"O
0 1 2345678910
dn Configuration
Figure 6-2. Plot of the enthalpies of hydration of the first transition
metal series M+^ and M+^ ions, (a) M+ ions; (b) M+ ions.
120
POTENTIAL
ENERGY
M(acac) 3
Complex
"Corrected"
4EfcM(acac)3
M*2
Electron
attachment
energy of
free ion
Free Ion
Figure 6-3. Effect of an octahedral ligand field on the energies of the
d orbitals of M+3 and M+2 ions.
121
the point charges than the orbitals of t2g symmetry which are directed
between the axes. Therefore, the eg set lie at higher energy relative
to the t2g set. These effects are illustrated for M+2 and M+3 ions in
Figure 6-3. The ligand-field parameter that expresses the magnitude of
the splitting in energy of the d orbitals is Dg. The t2g orbitals lie
at an energy of 4Dq lower than the energy barycenter resulting from the
spherical component of the electrostatic field, and the eg set lie 6Dq
higher (Figure 6-3). The energy difference between the two sets of
orbitals is therefore lODq. Note that the energy of the d orbitals for
the M+3 ion are raised in energy to a greater degree than for the M+2
ion. In the crystal field model this is caused by the stronger
attraction of the negative point charges to the +3 charge than the +2
charge and is the interpretation of the greater metal-ligand bond
strength in the M(acac)3 complexes than M(acac)3'. Values of lODq can
be obtained quite conveniently from absorbance spectra, usually in the
visible region. This can be done graphically, by using term diagrams.
The measured spectrum is fitted as closely as possible to the diagram
and the Dq or Dq/B value is read from the abscissa. In some cases (d3,
d6, and d8) the maximum of the first spin-allowed band yields the value
of lODq directly. In other cases (d2, d6 (low spin) and d7) lODq cannot
be obtained directly and configuration or term interaction must be
considered.
In the crystal field model, for any high-spin d-electron
configuration subject to the same octahedral ligand field, the energies
of the configurations d°, d5 and d10 are unaffected by the value of lODq,
since the stabilizing effect of occupying the t2g orbital set is offset
by an equivalent loss of energy by occupying the eg set. All other
ground state configurations are stabilized relative to the hypothetical
case where the d orbitals are degenerate in the complexes, due to
predominant occupancy of the lower energy t2g set. The lowering in
energy is termed the ligand field stabilization energy (LFSE). For
122
typical values of lODq, LFSE can be significant and gives rise to the
characteristic double periodic trend observed in Figure 6-2. For
example, Dg for the complex Cr(H20 ) 63+, which has a d3 configuration, is
1770 cm 1. The three d electrons all occupy the t2g orbital set and LFSE
is 12Dq = "60.7 kcal mol*^
An important question concerns the type of thermodynamic state
function that should be compared to spectroscopic energy parameters.
Since state energies are obtained from Franck-Condon transitions, it
would appear that in the absence of pressure-volume work the relevant
thermodynamic quantity derived spectroscopically would be enthalpies.
However, values of lODq are temperature dependent since they derive from
band maxima, which are temperature dependent as a result of changes in
the population of ground state vibrational levels with temperature and
structural changes that may occur as the temperature changes. Thus, the
"proper" thermodynamic quantity to be identified with spectroscopic
parameters is not rigorously defined (unless the experiments are all at
0 K, where TAS is zero).
Correlating trends in AG^°rM(acac)3(g)l and AH^fM^an using
spectroscopic LFSE values. It is convenient to separate the the
difference in heterolytic bond enthalpies for the M(acac)3 and M(acac)3’
complexes into two components according to eq 6-4.168
AAHhet°[M(acac)30/‘] = AAHhet,o[M(acac)30/'] + ALFSE 6-4
In eq 6-4 the term AAHhetl°[M(acac)30/* ] is the difference in heterolytic
bond enthalpy that would arise from the purely spherical component of
the ligand field in the crystal field model, and includes electrostatic,
covalent, polarization and steric effects not present in ALFSE.
Combining equations 6-3 and 6-4 gives equation 6-5.
123
AGa°[M(acac)3(g) ] - ALFSE = AHa°[M3+(g) ] + AAHhet,o[M(acac)30/-]
- T(ASa°[M(acac)3(g)]) 6-5
Since the periodic variance of AAHhet,°[M(acac)30/" ] can be expected to be
essentially smooth, and the effects of T(ASa°[M(acac)3(g) ]) are
relatively minor, from eq 6-5 a plot of AGg°[M(acac)3(g) ] - ALFSE can be
expected to reproduce the trend line generated by the values of
AHa°[M3+(g)] in Figure 6-1 (a). However, in order to calculate ALFSE it
is necessary to obtain values of Dq for both the M(acac)3 complexes and
the M(acac)3' ions.
There have been several reports in the literature on the ligand
field parameters for M(acac)3 complexes, determined from analyses of
visible spectra. 169,170 Unfortunately, the presence of intense charge
transfer bands partly obscure the d-d transitions, making it difficult
to obtain reliable values. However, Jorgensen f parameters can be
derived for fi-diketonate ligands, and values of lODq of sufficient
accuracy may be obtained for M(acac)3 and M(acac)3’ complexes, when
combined with established g parameters for the M(III) and M(II) ions
respectively. Values of f for a series of tris(B-diketonate) chromium
complexes have been determined by determining the absorbance maximum of
the 4A2g -* 4T2g transition for each complex in a solution of
chloroform100. The energy of this transition gives a value of lODq
directly. Values of f for Cr(acac)3 and Cr(hfac)3 were calculated to be
1.05 and 1.03 respectively, and were found to be almost identical for
all the other complexes studied. To determine whether these f values
are applicable to gas-phase complexes, the absorbance maximum of the
^A2g -» ^T2g transition was measured for Cr(hfac)3, in the gas-phase at
-350K, and in ethanol solution. The results are presented in Figure
6-4.
124
Figure 6-4. Comparison of the band maxima for the %» "VS transition
in Cr(hfac)^. Line a is the absorbance of Cr(hfac)3 in the gas-phase
and line b is the absorbance in solution (ethanol).
125
It can be seen that the absorbance maxima occur at approximately the
same wavelength, suggesting that the effect of the solvent has
apparently little affect on the relative energies of the electronic
states in fi-diketonate complexes.
The difference in electron attachment energy between the complexes
and the free ions that results from differences in e-/e- interactions
are ignored in the simple ALFSE approach. The method is therefore only
directly applicable to high-spin complexes, since the multiplicities of
the ground states for the complex and the free ion are the same.
However, the nephelauxetic effect of the ligands will reduce electron-
electron repulsion effects in the complex. The success of the simple
field approach in successfully accounting for the trends in electron
attachment energies for series of transition metal complexes relies,
therefore, on this effect being small compared to the changes in
heterolytic bond energies for the complexes.171 For low spin complexes,
large pairing energies must also be included in the the value of ALFSE.
This additional correction must be included in the value of ALFSE for
the Co(acac)307' couple, since Co(acac)3 has a low-spin d^ configuration.
From the appropriate ligand field expressions, Tanabe and Sugano172 have
shown this energy to be equal to 5B + 8C, where B and C are the Racah
electron repulsion parameters for the metal complex. Values of Dq and
ALSFE for the gas-phase M(acac)307' couples are given in Table 6-1. The
value of ALFSE for the Co(acac)30/‘ includes the value of 5B + 8C
required to correct for the pairing energy in low-spin d6 Co(acac)3.
Values of the Racah parameters B and C for Co(acac)3 have been
determined by Tsiamis and co-workers to be B = 425 cm'1 and C = 3650 cm'
1.1^1 The value of ALFSE for the Co(acac)3 couple is given by -
8Dq(Co(II)) - (-24Dq(Co(III))) - (5B + 8C) = 1.1 eV (Table 6-1). In
Figure 6-1 (b), line c, the trend line is shown that results from
subtracting the appropriate values of ALFSE from the experimental
AGa°[M(acac)3(g)] values. As can be seen, there is a striking
126
Table 6-1. Ligand Field Parameters for M(acacK0/~ Complexes.
M g 10^ 'em’''3 ALSFE/eVb
V(II)
12.3
12.9
V(III)
18.6
19.5
Cr(II)
14.1
14.8
Cr(III)
17.0
17.9
Mn(II)
8.5
8.9
Mn(III)
21
22.1
Fe(II)
10.0
10.5
Fe(III)
14.0
14.7
Co(II)
9.3
9.8
Co(III)
19.0
19.8
0.01
1.56
1.64
-0.52
1.10°
aA = f.g, with f(acac) = 1.05.
hoifference in ligand field stabilization energies (strond field limit)
for the process M(acac), -» M(acac),’. A negative value implies that the
electron attachment is favored by XFSE.
cIncludes pairing energy 5B + 8C (see text).
resemblence to the trend line for the AHa°[M+3(g)] values, suggesting
that the simple crystal field model is adequate to explain the
divergence of the features of the trend lines for the AHa°[M+3(g)] and
AGa°[M(acac)3(g)) values.
Trends in AGa° values for M(hfac)3 complexes. The order of the
metals (M) in the series of M(hfac)3 complexes for increasing values of
AGa°[M(hfac)3(g)] have been determined in this work to be the same as
that for the series of M(acac)3 complexes. Since -AGa° for V(hfac)3 was
found to be approximately 50 kcal mol'1 greater than for V(acac)3, it
has been assumed that -AGg0 for all other M(hfac)3 complexes are also
"50 kcal mol"1 than the M(acac)3 complexes of the same metal. The
127
values of ASg° for M(acac)3 complexes can be expected to be similar to
the values for the corresponding M(hfac)3 complexes, and so from eq 6-3
the higher -AGa° values for the M(hfac)3 complexes must result from
AAHhet°[M(acac)3] being greater than AAHhet°[M(hfac)3] by *50 kcal mol'1.
In the M(hfac)3 complexes, the 18 fluorine atoms exert a strong
negative inductive (-1) effect. As a result, the electron density in
the highest occupied molecular orbital (HOMO) of a M(hfac)3‘ complex
will be more delocalized and contain more ligand character than the
corresponding HOMO of a M(acac)3‘ complex. The lower e'/e’ repulsion in
the M(hfac)3 complexes causes the smaller change in metal-ligand bond
energies and the greater electron attachment energies.
Correlating trends in E° for M(H..0) (ao) couples and
AH3°rM'f3Ãa^ 1. It is interesting to compare the above treatment for the
gas-phase electron attachment energies for the M(acac)3 complexes to
that used by previous workers to correlate the trend in the values of
the standard reduction potentials for M(H20 ) 63+/2+(aq) couples to the
trend in AHg0[M+3(g) ] values. Starting with equation 6-2 for MLyn(soln)
= M(H20)63+(aq) and following the same procedure for the gas-phase
M(acac)3 complexes above, an equation relating the difference in
electron attachment energies between M(H20 ) 63+(aq) complexes and M+3(g)
ions is given in eq 6-6.
AGa°[M(H20)63+(aq) ) - ALFSE = AHa°[M+3(g)] + AAHhet,°[M(H20)63+/2+]
†AAHsolv°[M(H2°)63+/2+] " T(ASa°[M(H20 ) 63+(aq)]) 6-6
Values of Dq are available in the literature for M(H20)63+ and M(H20)62+
ions from spectroscopic studies and ALFSE is readily evaluated. In
chapter 5 the relationship between AGa°[MLyn( soln) ] and E° for the
MLyn/(n'15 (soln) redox couple was shown to be -AGa°[MLyn( soln) ] =
F(E°[MLyn/
potential of the standard hydrogen electrode and F is the Faraday
128
constant. Using this relationship, equation 6-6 can be written in terms
of the standard reduction potential of the M(H20)63+/2+ redox couple, eq
6-7.
-FE° - ALFSE = AHa°[M+3(g)] + AAHhet,°[M(H20)63+/2+] - AAHsoly°[M(HgO)63+/2+]
-T(ASa°[M(H20 ) 63+(aq)]) + Eabs°(SHE) 6-7
The terms AAHhet,°[M(H20 ) 63+/2+] - AAHsolv°[M(H20 ) 63+/2+] on the right-hand
side of eq 6-7 correspond to the difference in enthalpy separated by the
two dashed lines drawn through the series of AHhyd°[M+3(g) ] and
AHhyd°[M+2(g) ] values in Figure 6-2, which is a generally smooth trend.
The term ASa0[M(H2O)63+(aq)] contains the intramolecular entropy change
discussed in chapter 4, which is expected to be similar in magnitude to
the values of ASa°[M(acac)3(g)] and therefore small, and the entropy
change resulting from the difference in polarization of the solvent.
The latter contribution is a function of the charge and radius of the
ions involved in the couple and is predicted by the Born equation (eqs
4-13 and 4-14) to vary smoothly. The remaining term is the constant
E°abs(sHE), and therefore all terms except AHa°[M+3(g)] on the right-hand
side of eq 6-7 vary in a smooth periodic manner. The sum of the terms
on the right-hand side of eq 6-7 should therefore reflect the same
periodic trend as AHa°[M+3(g)]. The deviations in the periodic trend
lines between the values of E° for the M(H20 ) 63+^2+ couples and
AHa°[M+3(g)] can therefore be attributed to ALFSE, as was shown above for
the trend in AGa°[M(acac)3(g)] values.
Conclusions
The change in trends in electron attachment energies for complexes
in comparison to the corresponding free ions can be qualitatively
explained through consideration of the effects of ligand field splitting
of the primarily valence d orbitals. In particular the much reduced
129
range of values for AGa° for M = Ti-Co ("2 eV) in comparison to the free
ions ('7 eV) results from preferential stabilization of the reduced
forms of the M(acac)3" complexes for M = Cr, Mn and Co relative to the
M(acac)3. The magnitudes of the AGg° values for the M(hfac)3 complexes
are "50 kcal mol"1 higher than those for the corresponding M(acac)3
complexes and this can be considered a result of a smaller change in
heterolytic bond energy associated with the reduction of the M(hfac)3
complexes.
REFERENCES
(1) Christodoulides, A. A.; McCorkle, D. L.; Christopherou, L. G.
Electron-Molecule Interactions and Their Applications,
Christopherou, L. G., Ed.; Academic: New York (1984), 423.
(2) Siderov, L. N. Russ. Chem. Rev. (1980), 52., 356.
(3) Compton, R. N.; Reinhardt, P. W.; Cooper, C. D. J. Chem. Phvs.
(1978), 68/ 2023
(4) Compton, R. N. J. Chem. Phvs. (1977), 66, 4478.
(5) Page, F. M.; Goode, G. C. Negative Ions and the Magnetron, Wiley:
New York (1969)
(6) Burgess, J.; Haigh, I.; Peacock, R. D.; Taylor, P. J. Chem. Soc.
Dalton Trans. (1974), 1064
(7) Janousek, B. K.; Brauman, J. I. Gas-Phase Ion Chemistry, Bowers,
M. T., Ed.; Academic: New York (1979), Vol 2, 53.
(8) Engelking, P. C.; Lineberger, W. C. J. Am. Chem. Soc. (1979),
101, 5569
(9) Stevens, A. E.; Feigerle, C. S.; Lineberger, W. C. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. (1982), 104/ 5026.
(10) Grimsrud, E. P.; Caldwell, G.; Chowdhury, S.; Kebarle, P. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. (1985), 107, 4627.
(11) Chowdhury, S.; Heinis, T.; Grimsrud, E. P.; Kebarle, P. J. Phvs.
Chem. (1986), 90, 2747.
(12) Kebarle, P.; Chowdhury, S. J. Am. Chem. Soc. (1986), 108, 5453.
(13) Chowdhury, S.; Kishi, H.; Dillow, G. W.; Kebarle, P. Can. J.
Chem. (1989), 67, 603.
(14) Heinis, T.; Chowdhury, S.; Scott, S. L.; Kebarle, P. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. (1988), 110, 400.
(15) Paul, G.; Kebarle, P. J. Am. Chem. Soc. (1989), 111. 464.
(16)Me Iver, R. T.; Fukuda, E. K. In Lecture Notes in Chemistry.
Hartman, H., Wanzek, K. P., Eds.; Springer: Berlin (1982) 164.
(17)
Fukuda,
E.
K. ;
Mclver,
R. T. J.
Chem.
Phvs. (19822. 77.
4942
(18)
Fukuda,
E.
K.;
Mclver,
R. T. J.
Phvs.
Chem. (19832. 87.
2993
(19)
Fukuda,
E.
K.;
Mclver,
R. T. J.
Am. Chem. Soc. (19852.
107,
(20)
Shalev,
H.
; Evans, D.
H. J. Am.
Chem.
Soc. (19892, 111,
2667
130
131
(21) Freiser, B. S Anal. Chim. Acta. (1985), 178, 137-58.
(22) Jacobson, D. B.; Freiser, B. S. J, Am. Chem. Soc. (1983), 105,
5197.
(23) Squires, R. R. Chem. Rev. (1987), 87., 623-46.
(24) Sallans, L; Lane, K.; Squires, R.R; Freiser, B. S. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. (1985), 107, 4379-85.
(25) Hall, L. F.; Houriet, R.; Kappes, M.; Staley, R. H.; Beauchamp,
J. L. J. Am. Chem. Soc. (1982), 104/ 6293.
(26) Mandich, M. L.; Halle, L. F.; Beauchamp, J. L. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
(1984), 106, 4403.
(27) Allison, J.; Ridge, D. P. J. Am. Chem. Soc. (1979), 101, 4998.
(28) Allison, J.; Lombarski, M. Int. J. Mass. Spectrom. Ion. Proc.
(1983), 49, 281.
(29) Peake, D. A.; Gross, M. L. Anal. Chem. (1985), 57., 115.
(30) Aristov, N.; Armentrout, P. B. J. Am. Chem. Soc. (1984), 106,
4065.
(31) Weil, D. A.; Wilkins, C. L. J. Am. Chem. Soc. (1985), 107, 7316.
(32) Tews, E. C.; Freiser, B. S. J. Am. Chem. Soc. (1988), 109, 4433.
(33) Allison, J. Prog. Inorq. Chem. (1986), 34, 628.
(34) Freiser, B. S. Talanta (1985), 32, 697.
(35) Buckingham, D. A.; Sargeson, A. M. In Chelating Agents and Metal
Chelates, Dwyer, F. P.; Mellor, D. P., Eds.; Academic: New York,
(1964), 237.
(36) Jorgensen, K.; Acta Chem. Scand. (1956) 9, 1505.
(37) George, P.; McClure, D. S. Prog. Inorq. Chem. (1959), 1, 381.
(38) Fackler, J. P. Prog. Inorq. Chem. (1966) 2/ 361.
(39) Mehrotra, R. C.; Bohra, R.; Gaur, D. P. Metal-fl-diketonates and
Allied Derivatives. Academic: New York (1978).
(40) Morosin, B.; Montgomery, H. Acta Crvstalloqr. (1969), B25. 1354.
(41) Morosin, B. Acta Crvstalloqr. (1965), 19, 131.
(42) Morosin, B.; Brathovde, J. R. Acta Crvstalloqr. (1964), 17, 705.
(43) Iball, J.; Morgan, C. H. Acta Crvstalloqr. (1967), 2¿, 239.
(43) Hon, P. K.; Pfluger, C. E. Coord. Chem. (1973), 3, 67.
(44) Granoff, B. Ph.D. Thesis Piss. Abs. (1964) 4341-B.
(45) Kung-Jou Chao, G.; Sime, R. L.; Sime, R. J. Acta Crvstalloqr.
(1973), B29, 2845.
132
(46) Thomas, B. G.; Morris, M. L.; Hilderbrandt, R. L. Inorq. Chem.
(1978), 10, 2901.
(47) Pfleuger, C. E.; Haradem, P. S. Inorq. Chim. Acta (1983), 69,
141.
(48) Sievers, R. E.; Moshier, R. W. Inorq. Chem. (1966), 1, 966.
(49) Kutal, C.; Sievers, R. E., Inorq. Chem. (1974), 4, 897.
(50) Fortman, J. J.; Sievers, R. E. Coord. Chem. Rev. (1971), 6, 331.
(51) Serpone, N.; Bickley, D. G. Prog. Inorq. Chem. (1972), 17, 391.
(52) Hutchison, J. R.; Gordon. J. G.; Holm, R. H. Inorq. Chem. (1971),
10, 1004.
(53) Morgan, G. T.; Moss, H. W. J. Chem. Soc. (1914), 105. 189.
(54) Berg. E; Truemper, J. J. Phvs. Chem. (1960), 68, 487.
(55) Evans, S.; Hamnett, A.; Orchard, A. F.; Lloyd, D. R. Discuss.
Faraday Soc. (1972), 54, 227.
(56) Evans, S.; Hamnet, A. Orchard, A. F. J. C¿ord. Chem. (1972), 2,
57.
(57) Richeson, D. S.; Tonge, L. M.; Zhao, J.; Zhang, J.; Marcy, H. O. ;
Marks, T. J.; Wessels, B. W.; Kannewurf, C. R. AppI. Phvs. Lett.
(1989), 54, 2154.
(58) Zhang, K.; Kwak, B. S.; Boyd, E. P.; Wright, A. C.; Erbil, A.
Appl. Phvs. Lett. (1989), 54, 381.
(59) Zhao, J.; Dahmen, K. H.; Marcy, H. O; Tonge, L. M.; Marks, T. J.;
Wessels, B. W.; Kannewurf, C. R. Appl. Phvs. Lett. (1989), 53,
1750.
(60) Dickinson, P. H.; Geballe, T. H. J. Appl. Phvs. (1989), 66, 444.
(61) Panson, A. J.; Charles, R. G.; Schmidt, D. N.; Szedon, J. R.;
Machiko, G. J.; Braginski, A. I. Appl. Phvs. Lett. (1988), 53,
1756.
(62) Bancroft, G. M.; Reichert, C.; Westmore, J. B. Inorq. Chem.
(1967) 2, 870.
(63) Macdonald, C. G.; Shannon, J. S. Aust. J. Chem. (1966), 19, 1545.
(64) Pierce, J. L.; Busch, K. L.; Cooks, G.; Walton Inorq. Chem.
(1982) 21, 2597.
(65) Schildcrout, S. M. J. Phvs. Chem. (1976), 80, 2834.
(66) Reichert, C.; Bancroft, G. M.; Westmore, J. B. Can. J. Chem.
(1970), 48, 1362.
(67) Dakternieks, D. R.; Fraser, I. W.; Garnett, J. L.; Gregor, I. K.
Orq. Mass Spectrom. (1979), 14, 677.
(68) Garnett, J. L.; Gregor, I. K.; Guilhaus, M. Orq. Mass Spectrom.
(1978), 13, 591.
133
(69) Dakternieks, D. R.; Fraser, I. W.; Garnett, J. L.; Gregor, I. K.
Ora. Mass Spectrom. (1977), 12, 370.
(70) Dakternieks, D. R.; Fraser, I. W.; Garnett, J. L.; Gregor, I. K.
Ora. Mass Spectrom. (1979), 14, 330.
(71) Fraser, I. W.; Garnett, J. L.; Gregor, I. K.; Chem. Comm. (1974),
365.
(72) Handy, R. F.; Lindvedt, R. L. Inora. Chem. (1974), .13, 893.
(73) Endo, A.; Shimizu, K.; Sato, G. P. Chem. Lett. (1985), 581.
(74) Endo, A.; Hoshino, Y.; Hirakata, K.; Takeuchi, Y.; Shimizu, K.;
Furushima, Y.; Ikeuchi, H.; Sato, G. P. Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn.
(1989), 62, 709.
(75) Endo, A. Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn. (1983), 56, 2733.
(76) Patterson, G. S.; Holm, R. H. Inora. Chem. (1972), 11. 2285.
(77) (a) Comisarow, M. B.; Marshall, A. G. Chem. Phvs. Lett.
(1974), ¿4, 282; (b) Comisarow, M. B.; Marshall, A. G.;
Chem. Phvs. Lett. (1974), 26, 489; (c) Comisarow, M. B.;
Marshall, A. G. Can J. Chem. (1974), 52, 1997.
(78) For a recent review of the technique see (a) Buchanan, M. V.;
Comisarow, M. B. In Fourier Transform Mass Spectrometry;
Buchanan, M. V., Ed.; ACS Symposium Series 359 (1987), 1; (b)
Eyler, J. H.; Baykut, G. Trends in Analytical Chemistry (1986),
5, 44; (c) Marshall, A. G. Acc. Chem. Res. (1985), .18, 316.
(79) Comisarow, M. B.; Int. J. Mass. Spectrom. Ion Processes. (1981),
37, 251.
(80) Comisarow, M. B.; J. Chem. Phvs. (1978), 37, 251.
(81) Comisarow, M. B.; Grassi, V.; Parisod, G. Chem. Phvs. Lett.
(1978), 57, 413.
(82) Endo, A.; Shimizu, K.; Sato, G. P.; Mukaida, M. Chem. Lett.
(1984), 437.
(83) Ryan, M. F. Masters Dissertation. University of Florida (1990).
(84) Cellota, R. J.; Bennett, R.A.; Hall, J. L. J. Chem. Phvs. (1974),
60, 1740.
(85) Nimios, M. R.; Ellison, G. B. J. Phvs. Chem. (1986), 90, 2574.
(86) Sharpe, P.; Richardson, D. E. Coord. Chem. Rev. (1989), 93, 59.
(87) Me Dermid, I. S.; Webster, C. R. J. De Physique (1983), C7, 461.
(88) Prescott, S. R.; Campana, J. E.; Risby, T. H. Anal. Chem. (1977),
49, 1501.
(89) Kuge, Y.; Hattori, Y.; Asada, S.; Yamada, S. Chem. Lett. (1979),
3, 207.
134
(90) (a) Wagman, D. D; Evans, W. H; Parker, V. B; Halow, I; Bailey, S.
M.; Schuum, R. H. Selected Values of Chemical Thermodynamic
Properties. NBS Technical Note (1968), 270-3; (b) JANAF
Thermochemical Tables, Nat. Stand. Ref. Data Ser., Bur. Stand.
(U.S.) (1971), 37; (c) Rosenstock, H. M.; Draxl, K.; Steiner, B.
W.; Herron, J. T. J. Phvs. Chem. Ref. Data 6, Supplement 1
(1977); (d) Franklin, J. L.; Dillard, J. G.; Rosenstock, H. M.;
Herron, J. T.; Draxl, K.; Field, F. H. Nat. Stand. Ref. Data
Series. Nat. Bur. Stand. (U.S.) (1969), 26; (e) Gas-Phase Ion and
Neutral Thermochemistry. Lias, S. G.; Bartmess, J. E.; Liebman,
J. F. Holmes, J. L.; Levin, R. D.; Mallard, W. G., Eds.; American
Institute of Physics: New York, 1988.
(91) Rosenstock, H. M. In Kinetics of Ion Molecule Reactions; Ausloos,
P., Ed.; Plenum: New York, 1979, p 246.
(92) For positive ions see (a) Meot-Ner (Mautner), M. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. (1989), 111. 2830; (b) Nelsen, S. F.; Rumack, D.; Meot-Ner
(Mautner), M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. (1988), 110. 6303; (c) Lias, S.
G»; Ausloos, P. J. Am. Chem. Soc. (1978), 100. 6027; (d) Meot-Ner
(Mautner), M; Nelsen, S. F.; Willi, M. R.; Frigo, T. B. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. (1984), 106, 3784.
(93) Sonntag, R. E.; Van Wylen, G. J. Fundamentals of
Statistical Thermodynamics; Wiley: New York (1966).
(94) Trasatti, S. Electroanal. Chem. Interfac. Electrochem.
(1974), 52, 313.
(95) Parsons, R. In Standard Potentials in Aqueous Solution.
Bard, A. J.; Parsons, R.; Jordan, J., Eds.; Marcel Dekker:
New York (1985), Ch 2.
(96) Farrell, J. R.; McTigue, P. J. Electroanal. Chem. (1982),
139. 37.
(97) Trasatti, S. Pure Appl. Chem. (1986), 58, 955.
(98) Randles, J. E. B. Trans. Faraday Soc. (1956), 52, 1573.
(99) Potts, A. W. and Price, W. C. Trans. Faraday. Soc. (1971),
62, 1242
(100) Davies, C. G.; Gillespie, R. J.; Ireland, P. R. and Sowa, J. M.
Can. J. Chem. (1974), 52, 2048.
(101) Gillespie, R. J. and Morton, M. J. J. Molec. Spectrosc.
(1969), 30, 178.
(102) Lowenschuss, A.; Marcus, Y. Chem. Rev. (1984), 84, 89.
(103) Yee, E. L.; Cave, R. J.; Guyer, K. L.; Tyma, P. D.; Weaver,
M. J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. (1978), 101, 1131.
(104) Yee, E. L.; Weaver, M. J. Inora. Chem. (1980), 19, 1077.
(105) Hupp J. T.; Weaver, M. J. Inora. Chem. (1984), 23, 256.
(106) Brown, G. M.; Sutin, N. J. Am. Chem. Soc. (1979), 101.
4096.
135
(107) Ketclaar, J. A. A.; Van Oosterhoot, G. W. Rec. Trav. Chim.
Pavs-Bas (1943), 62, 197,
(108) Barnet, T.; Craven, B. M. ; Freeman, H, C.; Ibers, J. A.
Chem. Commun. (1966), 307.
(109) Stynes, H. C. ; Ibers, J. A. Inorq. Chem. (1971), 1C), 2304.
(110) Kime, N. E.; Ibers, J. A.Acta Crvstalloqr., Sect. B (1969),
25, 168.
(111) Brown, T. L.; Me Dugle, W. G.,; Kent, L. G. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
(1970), 92, 3645.
(112) Bosworth, Y; Clark, R. J. H. Chem. Soc., Dalton Trans.
(1974), 1749.
(113) Creighton, J. A.; Sinclair, T. J. Spectrochim. Acta (1978),
35A. 507.
(114) Nakagawa, I.; Shimanouchi, T. Spectrochim. Acta (1962), 18,
101.
(115) Schmidt, K. H.; Muller, A. Inorq. Chem. (1975), .14, 2183.
(116) Nakamoto, K. Infrared and Raman Spectra of Inorganic and
Coordination Compounds. Wiley: New York (1978).
(117) Templeton, J. L. Inorq. Chem. (1980), 19, 1075.
(118) George, P.; Hanania, G. I.; Irvine, D. H. J. Chem. Soc.
(1959), 2548.
(119) Jahn, H. A.; Teller, E. Proc. Rov Soc. (1938), A164, 117.
(120) Ballhausen, C. J. Introduction to Ligand Field Theory;
McGraw-Hill: New York (1962), p 193.
(121) Piper, T. S. J. Chem. Phvs. (1961), 35, 1240.
(122) Figgis, B. N. Introduction to Ligand Fields; Wiley
Interscience: New York (1966).
(123) Rillema, D. P.; Jones, D. S.; Levy, H. A. J. Chem. Soc.
Chem. Commun. (1979), 849.
(124) (a) Born, M. Z. Phvs. (1920), 1, 45. (b) For a concise
review of Born models applied to solvation, see Gomez-
Jeria, J. S.; Morales-Lagos, D. J. Phvs. Chem. (1990), 94.
3790.
(125) Altschuler, A. P. J. Chem. Phvs. (1956), 24, 642.
(126) Altschuler, A. P. J. Chem. Phvs. (1958), 28, 1254.
(127) Vasilev, V. P.; Zolotarev, E. K.; Kapustinskii, A. F.;
Mishchenko, K. P.; Podgornaya, E. A.; Yatsimirskii, K. B.
Russ. J. Phvs. Chem. (Engl. TransÃ.) (1960), ¿4, 840.
(128) Krestov, G. A. Russ. J. Phvs. Chem. (Engl. TransÃ.) (1968),
42, 452.
136
(129) Saito, Y.; Taakemoto, J.; Hutchinson, B.; Nakamoto, K.
Inora. Chem. (1972), 13., 2003.
(130) Hutchinson, B.; Takemoto, J.; Nakamoto, K. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. (1970), 92, 3335.
(131) (a) Westmore, J. B. Chem. Rev. 1976, 6, 695 (b) Green, J.
C. Struct. Bonding 1981, 43, 37.
(132) Evans, S.; Green, M. L. H.; Jewitt, B.; King, G. H.;
Orchard, A. F. J. Chem. Soc. Faraday Trans. 2 (1974), 20,
356.
(133) Richardson, D. E.; Christ, C. S.; Sharpe, P.; Ryan, M. F.;
Eyler, J. R. ACS Symposium Series 428 Bond Energetics in
Orqanometallic Comounnds, T. Marks, Ed. (1989), 70.
(134) Meot-Ner (Mautner), M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. (1989), 111, 2830
(135) Bar, R.; Heinis, T.; Nager, C.; Jungen, M. Chem. Phys.
Lett. (1982), 91, 440.
(136) Richardson, D. E.; Christ, C. S.; Sharpe, P.; Eyler, J. R.
J. Am. Chem. Soc. (1986), 109, 3894.
(137) Moore, C. E., National Standard Reference Data Series 34
U.S.Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C. (1970).
(138) Hotop, H; Lineberger, W. C. J. Phvs. Chem. Ref. Data
(1975), 4, 539
(139) Wood, J. L. and Jones, M. M. Inora. Chem. (1964), 3, 1553
(140) (a) Hill, J. O. and Irving, R. J. J. Chem. Soc. (A) (1967),
1413.; (b) Hill, J. O. and Irving, R. J. J. Chem. Soc. (A)
(1968), 1052.; (c) Hill, J. O. and Irving, R. J. J. Chem.
Soc. (h) (1968), 3116.
(141) (a) Ribeiro Da Silva, M. A. V. and Ferrao, M. L. C. C. H.
Can. J. Chem. (1988), 66, 651.; (b) Ribeiro Da Silva, M. A.
V. and Ferrao M. L. C. C. H. J. Chem. Thermodynamics
(1987), 19, 645.; (c) Ribeiro Da Silva, M. A. V. and
Ferrao M. L. C. C. H. J. Chem. Thermodynamics (1988), 20,
79.
(142) Ribeiro Da Silva, M. A. V. and Ferrao, M. L. C. C. H.;
Magalhaes, A. M. L. Thermochim. Acta. (1988), 129 (2) .
229.
(143) Ribeiro Da Silva, M. A. V. In Thermochemistry and Its
Applications to Chemical and Biochemical Systems. Ribeiro
Da Silva, M. A. V., Ed.; NATO ASI series, Reidel: Dordrect
(1984), 317.
(144) Cavel, K. J.; Pilcher, G. J. Chem. Soc. Faraday Trans. I
(1977), 73, 1590.
(145) Murray, J. P.; Hill, J. O. Thermochim. Acta. (1984), 72
(3), 341.
(146) Cumming, J. B. and Kebarle, P. Can. J. Chem. (1978), ¿6, 1.
137
(147) McClure, D. S. In Some Aspects of Crystal Field Theory,
Dunn, T. M.; McClure, T. M.; Pearson, R. G., Eds.; Harper
and Row: New York (1965); (b) Burdett, J. K. Molecular
Shapes; Wiley-Interscience: New York (1980); Ch. 10.
(148) The N. B. S. Tables of Chemical Thermodynamics Properties.
J. Phys. Chem. Ref. Data (1982), 1¿. Supplement no. 2.
(149) Irving, R. J. and Wadso I. Acta Chemica Scandinavia (1970),
24, 589.
(150) Hacking, J. M. and Pilcher, G. J. Chem. Thermodynamics
(1979), 11, 1015.
(151) Latimer, W. M.; Pitzer, K. S.; Slansky, C. M. J. Chem.
Phys. (1939), 2, 108.
(152) Noyes, R. M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. (1962), 84, 513.
(153) Haliwell, H. F.; Nyburg, S. C. Trans. Faraday Soc. (1963),
59, 1126.
(154) Morris, D. F. C. Structure and Bonding (1968), 4, 63.
(155) Reiss, H.; Heller, A. J. Phvs. Chem. (1985), 89, 4207.
(156) Conway, B. E. J. Solution Chem. (1978), 1_, 721.
(157) Trasatti, S. Pure Appl. Chem. (1986), 58, 955.
(158) Endo, A; Watanabe, M; Hayashi, S; Shimizu, K.; Sato, G. P.
Bull. Chem. Soc. Japan. (1978), 51. 800.
(159) Murray, R. W.; Hiller, L. K. Anal. Chem. (1967), 39, 1221.
(160) Tocher, J. H.; Fackler, J. P. Inora. Chim. Acta. (1985),
102, 211.
(161) Tsiamis, C.; Cambanis, S.; Hadjikostas, C. Inora. Chem.
(1987), 26, 26.
(162) Yamaguchi, K.; Sawyer, D. T. Inora. Chem. (1985), 24, 971.
(163) Mohd, A. N.; Riechel, T. L. Inora. Chem. (1981), 20, 1974.
(164) Sahami, S.; Weaver, M. J. J. Solution Chem. (1981), 10,
199.
(165) Satsu, Y.; Endo, A; Shimizu, K.; Sato, G. P.; Ono, K.;
Watanabe, I.; Ikeda, S. Chem. Lett. (1986), 585.
(166) Brunschwig, B.; Ehrenson, S.; Sutin, N. J. Phys. Chem. (1986),
90, 3657 and references therein.
(167) Grifith, J. S. The Theory of Transition Metal Ions;
University Press: Cambridge (1964).
(168) Orgel, L. E. An introduction to Transition Metal Chemistry.
Methuen: London. (1960).
(169) Fatta, A. M.; Lindvedt, R. L. Inora. Chem. (1971), 10, 478.
138
(170) Lindvedt, R. L.; Kernitsky, L. K. Inorq. Chem. (1970), 9, 491.
(171) Richardson Sharpe, Inora chem. in press.
(172) Tanabe, Y.; Sugano, S. J. Phvs. Soc. Japan (1954) 9, 766.
BIOGRAPHICAL SKETCH
The author was born in Warrington, Lancashire, England, in
November of 1958. After attending Appleton Grammar School, he left to
work as an analytical chemist at Warrington effluent treatment works for
a period of three years, while attending St. Helens Technical College on
a day release basis. In 1980 he obtained the higher national
certificate in chemistry. Feeling a desire for an academic environment,
the author became a full-time student in 1980 at Preston Polytechnique
Institute, studying for Graduateship of the Royal Society of Chemistry
examinations parts I and II. After gaining a pass at the examinations
in 1982, he returned to work for one year before being accepted into the
graduate chemistry program at Auburn University, Alabama, USA. Aiming
his goals still higher, the author was accepted into the graduate
chemistry program at the University of Florida in 1984.
139
I certify that I have read this study and in my opinion it
conforms to acceptable standards of scholarly presentation and is fully
adequate, in scope and quality, as a dissertation for the Doctor of
Philosophy.
David E. Richardson
Associate Professor of Chemistry
I certify that I have read this study and in my opinion it
conforms to acceptable standards of scholarly presentation and is fully
adequate, in scope and quality, as a dissertation for the Doctor of
Philosophy.
I certify that I have read this study and in my opinion it
conforms to acceptable standards of scholarly presentation and is fully
adequate, in scope and quality, as a dissertation for the Doctor of
Philosophy.
Russell S. Drago
Graduate Research Professor of
Chemistry
I certify that I have read this study and in my opinion it
conforms to acceptable standards of scholarly presentation and is fully
adequate, in scope and quality, as a dissertation for the Doctor of
Philosophy.
I certify that I have read this study and in my opinion it
conforms to acceptable standards of scholarly presentation and is fully
adequate, in scope and quality, as a dissertation for the Doctor of
Philosophy.
Chemical Engineering
This dissertation was submitted to the Graduate Faculty of the
Department of Chemistry in the College of Liberal Arts and Sciences and
to the Graduate School and was accepted as partial fulfillment of the
requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy.
Dean, Graduate School
August 1990
UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA
3 1262 08556 8102
xml version 1.0 encoding UTF-8
REPORT xmlns http:www.fcla.edudlsmddaitss xmlns:xsi http:www.w3.org2001XMLSchema-instance xsi:schemaLocation http:www.fcla.edudlsmddaitssdaitssReport.xsd
INGEST IEID E1XPC0T89_526VW9 INGEST_TIME 2017-07-11T21:06:24Z PACKAGE AA00002118_00001
AGREEMENT_INFO ACCOUNT UF PROJECT UFDC
FILES
|
|