Title: Letter of Comments on Agenda for Water Supply Development and Funding Group via The Sierra Club Legal Defense Fund, Inc.
CITATION THUMBNAILS PAGE IMAGE ZOOMABLE
Full Citation
STANDARD VIEW MARC VIEW
Permanent Link: http://ufdc.ufl.edu/WL00004967/00001
 Material Information
Title: Letter of Comments on Agenda for Water Supply Development and Funding Group via The Sierra Club Legal Defense Fund, Inc.
Physical Description: Book
Language: English
 Subjects
Spatial Coverage: North America -- United States of America -- Florida
 Notes
Abstract: Jake Varn Collection - Letter of Comments on Agenda for Water Supply Development and Funding Group via The Sierra Club Legal Defense Fund, Inc. (JDV Box 39)
General Note: Box 29, Folder 12 ( Water Supply Planning and Funding Committee - 1996 ), Item 5
Funding: Digitized by the Legal Technology Institute in the Levin College of Law at the University of Florida.
 Record Information
Bibliographic ID: WL00004967
Volume ID: VID00001
Source Institution: Levin College of Law, University of Florida
Holding Location: Levin College of Law, University of Florida
Rights Management: All rights reserved by the source institution and holding location.

Full Text


OCT 03 '9 06:O2PM SCLDF-FLORIDA P.2/3



SIERRA CLUB LEGAL

DEFENSE FUND, INC.
The Law Firm for the Environmental Movement,

Sumir. Mr erMSa. d Maalm ni S. Martin Luther King, Jr. Blvd., Tallahazsee, Florida 3?oi (o904) 68i-oox FAX (o904) 68r- 0020
P.O. Box x329, TallahascS Florida 3z3o EMail: sdfforida@igc.apc.org


Memorandum

To: Estus Whitfield
Executive Office of the Governor

Prom: Ansley Samson
David Guest
Sierra Club Legal Defense Fund, Inc...

.DATE October 3, 1996

Re: Comments bn Agenda for Water Supply Development
and .Funding'Group


We suggest the following changes to the proposed four-page:agenda
that you distributed at our September 30,. 1996, meeting.

In Section I.A(1) (a), we suggest specifying that any discussion
regarding the use of public lands for water, supply projects
should be specific about what species of public land is proposed
for use (e.g., state sovereignty lands would be inappropriate for.
such projects).

We strongly support the discussion included in Sections I:A(i)(b)
Sand I.A(1)(c).regarding-water conservation as a means of
increasing water supply..

In Section I.A(l)(d), we suggest adding.discussion'regarding
development of reuse sources-and the possibility of preferring
such reuse sources .to new sources.

We support.discuss.ion of sustainability.of ecosystems in the
context of water supply development -- Section I.A(3) (b). We
further suggest including discussion of water quality issues in
the context of supply development.

Currently Section II.A.(1) suggests three specific long-term
funding mechanisms. Of these, only water use fees are a
realistic.means of funding water supply development. Moreover,
no discussion:of the possibility of impact fees is highlighted --


SBozeman, Mo.nina De vcr. Colorado Honolulu, Hawaii .Junw Al ik New Orlean, Louisiana
san Francisco. California Smattle, Wahingtoa 'Washington, D.C.





OCT 03 '96 06:03PM SCLDF-FLORIDA F'-;



the only other feasible way of:raising funds. We thus suggest
deleting II.A(l)(a) and II.A.(1)(c), and adding a reference to
discussion of impact fees.

We do not believe that this group should discuss the possibility
of interjurisdictional water transfers -- specifically.alluded to
in II.A(2)(c) and II.C(l-)(c). Such discussion-would require
significant additional time and resources to understand
adequately environmental consequences.

.Finally, we suggest that Section II.C should be moved,to precede
discussion of funding,(currently Section II.A). A discussion of
how much water costs,' or should cost, and who should pay for
water, logically precedes a discussion of how to generate money
to pay for water supply development.




University of Florida Home Page
© 2004 - 2010 University of Florida George A. Smathers Libraries.
All rights reserved.

Acceptable Use, Copyright, and Disclaimer Statement
Last updated October 10, 2010 - - mvs