OU OFF. OF ENV. AFF.
executive On"rr or the Governor
Ofrc' of Planning and Budgeting,
The Capiol, Room 1502
Tallahasee, Florida 32399-0001
Fa ften 222- o3q
Number of pa u ineludift: covtr thae 5
PAULA L. ALLEN
8ENO19M GOVaRNMNTA.L AAwwYaV
I 3eWrO. N DMMTAL, COMMUmrI
1 ft EoMMI DXV-LOPMBMT l>UrP0r UITr
oarre or PLANLNIa & EuaerTINM
i mw.oVrPPI r ,O ( ovN, iaCum
PA.: (004) *alHI0
REMARKS: 1U UrEn
9:06 No.003 P.01
0For your rvi.-w
D Reply ASAP
0 Pleas* commn
GOU OFF. OF ENV. AFF. TEL; -904-922-62CC
GLUCKMAN & GLUCKMAN
Attorneys rt I w
641 Old MagnoIo Rood
CrawfordMlle. Foridno 3997
To: Water Funding Core Group
From; Phil Parson, Co-chair
Date: January 22,1997
ihis transmiaon conumin 4 paga inch ding this cover shct.
AA ynur drafling group, we have attempted to include all the ideas and
positions on which thid group reached consensus (or appeared to). This attempt
resulted in the draft which follows. PIaw* review the attached draft and be prepared
to discuss it when we meet on Wednesday, January 29. Please also identify any
issues which we missed in preparing the draft.
9:07 ko.003 P.02
OF ENV. AFF. TELJ:1-904-922-620 Jan 23,97 9:07 No.003 P.03
WATLIR SUPPLY FUNDING CORE GROUP
January 23, 1997
To review existing funding authority for water resource development and water
supply develrpmnent and recommend new funding as necessary.
There is considerable existing revenue-raising authority fur water projecl- at the
local, regional and state levels. However, Increasing water (denrnd and limited
natural resources suggest that limited new revenue m ur.es are needed to meet a
few specific circumstances.
1. General principles:
a. Beneficiaries of water projects should pay the costs of the projects from which
b. Water management districts should take the lead in identifying and
implementing water resource develtpnent projects. Most regionally significant
water resource projects should be paid for through water management district
c. TLocal governments and water utilities should take the lead in identifying and
implementing water supply development projects. Most water supply projects
should continue to be paid for through local water users and other local funding
d. An entity with revenue-raising authority should have tie ability to allocate those
funds and should not be mandated to spend those funds on a particular program or
2. The Regional Water Supply Plans developed and adopted by the water
aianagemenl dislriclt should provide the framework for identifying water resource
development projects, water supply development noods, reasonably available water
GQV- OFF. OF ENV. AFF. TEL j-904-922-6200 Jan 23,97 9:07 No.003 P.04
sources, and options to assist local govenmneni and water supply decision-makers in
identifying funding needs.
3. It appears there is a need for water resources development. These needs are best
identified through the Regional Water Supply Plans. Each water managema.nl
district's Plan should include both existing funding and additional funding needs Lo
carry out their responsibilities as these water ruotuce developmenie goals are
4. Each Regional Water Supply Plan should include the amount of funding; the
source of funds, where appropriate; and the xislence of any funding shortfalls for
the implementation of the water management district responsibilities identified in
5. The water supply and water resource problems of the Lower East Coast are
different from olter areas in the state and may require a unique funding solution.
6. To meet existing and future local capital needs for production of water supply,
local governments and water utilities should be given additional revenue-raising
While local referenda requirements .should not be attached to any additional
authority provided, the following policies should be required to provide
lkcl governments should expressly articulate the public policy
considerations for selecting the new funding source, how the money will be
spent and the relationship to other existing sources of funding for water
local governments may use the new money on projects of primarily local
impact, but, if the project will have interurisdictionnl impacts, the project
must serve a regional purpose and avoid interjurisdicional conflict.
if private water utilities exist in the area, a local government accessing these
new funding sources must allow the private utility to share in these monies
since the utilities' custonmeis will contribute to the payment of these taxes.
these new monies Tmust not be used to replace, supplant or support the
diversikcn of existing levels of funding for water projects for use on projects or
ai:tivities unrelated to water.
7. There should be new funding to allow the districts or state to provide limited
funding for projects which contribute to the greater public good. To be of "greater
public good", a project must be of regional or statewide significance, must support
the strategies of the Regional Water Supply Plan and mux.t:
create a nearby, dependable, sustainable supply of water which is not
otherwise financially feasible through use of other available funding sources,
GOU OFF. OF ENV. AFF.
TEI :I -Q()A-
S.."--_ ---zz-_-u Jan 23,97 9:09 ho.003 P.05
Sbe economically or environmentally superior in preventing or limiting
adverse areawide water resource impacts but which is initially more
expensive than other potential alternatives, or
make significant implementation of reuse or conservation of water in a
manner which contributes to the sustainability of regional water soun:es.
8. It is in the long-term best interest uf Florida for the Legislature adopt enabling
legislation and to appropriate the required 20% matching funds to allow the use of a
revolving loan fund through access to new moneys available under the
amendments to the federal Safe Drinking Water Art.
State appropriation of $8.8 million for federal FY 1997 generates a total of
State appropriation of $6.9 million for federal PY 1998 generates a total of
9. Given the likelihood of limited new funding and recognizing the various types
of problems which need to be addressed, the Legislature should consider providing
further public policy direction on prioritizing the use of new funding.
The drafting group has reviewed the definitions for "water supply development"
and "water resources development" as currently proposed by the Planning
Committee. We suggest thai the Funding Committee adopt the following changes:
"Water resources development" means the formulation and implementation of
regional water resource management strategies, including the collection and
evaluation of surface water and groundwater data; no-st ructural programs to
prd~et water sources: the development of regional water resource implementation
programs; and the construction, operation and maintenance of major public works
facilities to provide for flood control, surface and underground water storage, and
groundwater recharge augmentation; and technical assistance to loal government
and water uLlilties.
"Water supply development" means the planning, design, construction, operation,
and maintenance of public or private facilities for water collection, treatment,
transmission and distribution for sale, resale, or end use.