JAN-30-19S7 12:35 FROM
r 3BY,ANDERSON,& GREY TO
HOBBY, ANDERSON & GREY, P.A.
5709 Tidalwave Drive
New Port Richey, Florida 34652
Phone: (813) 847-5854
Telecopier: (813) 841-8685
TELECOPIER COVER SHEET
PLEASE DELIVER IMMEDIATELY
January 30, 1997
This transmission consists of 3 page(s) including this cover sheet. If you should
have any problems in receiving this transmission please contact us at our phone
number above. The original wll not follow by mail.
TO: Terry Pride (904) 922-5380
Estus Whitfield (904) 922-6200
Jake Vam (904) 222-0398
Butch Calhoun (904)-877-0981
Eva Armstrong (904) 224-6056
Oel Wingo (904) 629-8391
Wade Hopping (904) 222-7500
Chuck Littlejohn -(904) 681-8796
David Guest (904) 681-0020
Bram Canter (904) 222-2126
John McCue (904) 926-2071
Mike Slayton (561) 687-6200
Janet Llewwellyn (904) 922-5380
Charles Pattison (904) 488-3309
Chuck Aller (904) 488-7585
Fred Rapach (407) 641-3426
JoAnn chase (904) 413-7004
Nancy Stewart (904) 385-9854
Dan Stengle (904) 922-4292
FROM: Frederick T. Reeves, Esq.
Hobby, Anderson & Grey
RE: Subcommittee Report (Consensus Not Reached) and
Alternative Proposal by DEP Sec. 373.1715 minimum flows
and levels legislation
MESSAGE: See attached: MEMORANDUM
If you do not receive all pages, please telephone or telefax immediately. THANK
TO 190422223S8 P.02/03
JAN-30-1997 12:35 FROM "BBY, NDERSON, CGEY
TO: CLYDE HOBBY
FROM: FRED REEVES
DATE: JANUARY 30, 1997
RE: PROPOSED DRAFTS OF SEC. 373.1715
I have reviewed two similar drafts of proposed Sec.
373.1715, one entitled "Subcommittee Report (Consensus Not
Reached)" and the other entitled "Alternative Proposal of DEP".
I. Subcommittee Report
1. Paragraph 1 would unacceptably delay the implementation of
mfls. The language stating that, if mfls are below the minimum
level or projected to fall below the minimum level, water
resource development strategies and other actions are to be
initiated so that mfls will recover "as soon as practicable" will
have the effect of delaying the implementation of adopted mfls
for years, since new or alternative sources of water can take an
extremely long time to bring online.
2. While mfls are delayed in their implementation,
environmental damage would continue to occur in stressed areas
(e.g., areas suffering from overpumpage from wellfields),
significant harm continues to occur to the water resource, and
damage continues to occur to private owners' property and
3. Delay in implementation of mfls is virtually guaranteed by
the requirement in paragraph 1 that "(a)ny such strategies or
actions shall include phasing or a timetable that will allow the
development and implementation of conservation or efficiency
measures and water resource development... in conjunction with,
and to the extent practicable concurrent with, any reductions in
permitted allocations or current withdrawals of existing users."
4. "Phasing" or "timetable" requirements that allow for new
conservation and water sources again could delay implementation
of mfls for years, with the resulting harm to the environment,
water resources, and private property. New water sources are
expensive and take an extremely long time to come online, and
impacted areas such as the wellfield areas in Pasco don't have
that much time to wait.
5. Paragraph 2, requires that preexisting alterations to
surface waters be considered when establishing mfls. This comes
dangerously close to grandfathering impacts which may have
JAN-30-1997 12:36 FROM OmBY,ANDERSON, 8 GrPEY
January 30, 1997
occurred prior to mfl adoption, and should not play a part in mfl
6. Mfls should be established, as presently required by Sec.
373.042, at an environmentally sustainable level, without
considering mitigation, grandfathering of impacts, and related
issues. These issues could be addressed in the permitting
process or other rule criteria.
II. Alternative Proposal by DEP
7. Paragraph 1 changes "water resource development strategies
and other actions" to "a recovery or prevention strategy", but my
same criticisms to the "Subcommittee Report" paragraph 1 would
apply to DEP's paragraph 1.
8. For paragraph 2, my same criticisms to the "Subcommittee
Report" paragraph 2 would apply.
III. Exemption to Legislation
9. If this legislation becomes law, those areas and waters
identified in Sec. 373.042(2), Fla. Stat. (1996 Supp.)(priority
areas and waters for establishment of mfls for surface
watercourses, aquifers, and surface water in Hillsborough, Pasco
and Pinellas counties) should be exempted from the law's
operation and effect so that no delay results in the
implementation of mfls in these highly stressed areas.