Title: Errata Sheet for Governor's Water Supply Development and Funding Report and Survey Sheet
CITATION THUMBNAILS PAGE IMAGE ZOOMABLE
Full Citation
STANDARD VIEW MARC VIEW
Permanent Link: http://ufdc.ufl.edu/WL00004781/00001
 Material Information
Title: Errata Sheet for Governor's Water Supply Development and Funding Report and Survey Sheet
Physical Description: Book
Language: English
 Subjects
Spatial Coverage: North America -- United States of America -- Florida
 Notes
Abstract: Jake Varn Collection - Errata Sheet for Governor's Water Supply Development and Funding Report and Survey Sheet (JDV Box 39)
General Note: Box 29, Folder 3 ( Water Supply Funding & Development - 1997 ), Item 6
Funding: Digitized by the Legal Technology Institute in the Levin College of Law at the University of Florida.
 Record Information
Bibliographic ID: WL00004781
Volume ID: VID00001
Source Institution: Levin College of Law, University of Florida
Holding Location: Levin College of Law, University of Florida
Rights Management: All rights reserved by the source institution and holding location.

Full Text
ECOSYSTEM MANAGEMENT F-<:904-922-53


EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF tI!E GOVERNOR
The Capitol, Room 1501
Tallahassee, Florida 32399-0001
(904)488-5551, FAX: (904) 922-.200


MEMORA ND I TM ., -I
TO: All Interested Parties and
Water Supply Development and Fn ding Work Group

FROM: Estus WhitfielP '

SUBJECT: Governor's Water Supply DevelboIent aad Funding Report

DATE: March 4 1997
? ;' 7


By now you should have received your bound copy of.l
Development and Funding Report. Regrettably, we bay,
technical corrections that we would like to make. You, 9
the attached Errata sheet.

I am interested in your views on process. The facilitate
report had a number of unique features that we had never
that I hope you will complete and return by March 14, 1
Consortium by FAX or by mail. The Conflict Resolutio
send these to us and to all of you in March.


e Governor's Water Supply
found 4 few typographical errors and
ill find these corrections identified on


process we used to accomplish this
seen implemented. Attached is a survey
97, to the Conflict Resolution
L folks will compile your responses and


Should you have any questions, please contact Paula AlIn, Terry Pride or me at (904) 488-5551.


EDW/jd


Attachments


Mar 6 '92,, 16:18 P.33/05




ECOSYSTEM MANAGEMENT F-<:904-922-53


ERRATA SHEET FOR

GOVERNOR'S WATER SUPPLY DEVELOPMENT AND
FUNDING REPORT T


Pg. 14 R-42
recommendations "3 and 36" should be,'"



Pg. 19 R-48- last line:
"recommendation 47" should be "recomq



Apdx C-2 Substitute:

Fred Rapach
Palm Beach Co. Board of Commissioners
Water Utilities Department
West Palm Beach, Florida 33416
407-641-3429 phone
407-641-3462 fax



Apdx F-l Ist paragraph, 11th line:
"reviewed" not review



Apdx F-2 #2
(See Appendix G for Work Group Guid4











I .. .


t and 36".




tendation 42".





















lines)


Mar 6 '9, 16:19 P. 05/05


a *


I




ECOSYSTEM MANAGEMENT W-K:904-922-53

WATER SUPPLY DEVELOP


Mar 6 '9 16:18 P.04/05

ENT & FUNDING WORK GROUP


FAX BAC K SURVEY

Please take a moment to fill out the FAXC or (m il) back this survey to the Conflict
Resolution Consortium by C.O.4. March 14, 1997 to


Please indicate whether you are a Core Group Representative:

As a member of the Work Group, we are seeking your ing
between October. 1996 and February, 1997. The Governor's office
consensus on water supply development and funding issues. Your
process and your ideas for improving it if the Work Group were to
Governor's office and others interested in the utility of this approa
this stakeholder process in developing consensus on other legislati'
responses received from all members and send to the Govemor's 0

1. Was the facilitated work group process succe;


Providing information needed for members to participate
Giving all members an opportunity to participate
S Eliciting input from different stakeholder perspectives
S Providing balanced discussion of key issues and ideas
* Minimizing repetitive comments & keeping to the agenda
S Generating useful, constructive recommendations
through the committees that were adopted as consensus
items by the Work Group

2. Please assess the usefulness of the following;

S Initial process for stakeholders selecting representatives
to serve on the Work Group
* Consensus ranking of proposed committee
recommendations
* Facilitated committee discussion and development of
recommendations Nov. Jan.
* The single text and final amendment and consensus
adoption process on February 14, 1997


68


SYES NO

ut in the Work Group process conducted
, convened this new approach to seeking
candid valuation of your experience with this
be conveyed after the 1997 session will help the
h. In addition, it may offer insight for the use of
e initiatiVes. We will produce a summary of the
office andiback to you in March.


sful in::
f Successful


Unsuccessful


5-4--3-2-1
5--4-3---2---1
5--4-3-2-1
5--4-3--2---1
5-4---3--2--- I1


E Effective


Not Effective


5--4--3--2-1


What did you like best about the facilitated Work Group process?


4. What suggestions or recommendations do yoq
future or for its application in other legislative


have fqr improving the process in the
consensus building efforts?


(use reverse side Ifyou need more room)


FAX 1 904-644.4




University of Florida Home Page
© 2004 - 2010 University of Florida George A. Smathers Libraries.
All rights reserved.

Acceptable Use, Copyright, and Disclaimer Statement
Last updated October 10, 2010 - - mvs