Title: Water Supply Work Group Proposed Final Decision Process
CITATION THUMBNAILS PAGE IMAGE ZOOMABLE
Full Citation
STANDARD VIEW MARC VIEW
Permanent Link: http://ufdc.ufl.edu/WL00004660/00001
 Material Information
Title: Water Supply Work Group Proposed Final Decision Process
Physical Description: Book
Language: English
 Subjects
Spatial Coverage: North America -- United States of America -- Florida
 Notes
Abstract: Jake Varn Collection - Water Supply Work Group Proposed Final Decision Process (JDV Box 70)
General Note: Box 24, Folder 5 ( Water Supply Work Group/Planning and Management - 1996/1997 ), Item 5
Funding: Digitized by the Legal Technology Institute in the Levin College of Law at the University of Florida.
 Record Information
Bibliographic ID: WL00004660
Volume ID: VID00001
Source Institution: Levin College of Law, University of Florida
Holding Location: Levin College of Law, University of Florida
Rights Management: All rights reserved by the source institution and holding location.

Full Text
- FL. Conflict.Resolution Fax:904-921-9066 Jan 22 '97 17:44

FSU MAIL CODE: 4161


P. 01/03


lake Yarn
The Florida State University Worklfg Copy
2031 East Paul Dirac Drive, Suite 132
Tallahassee, Florida 32310



Telephone: 904/644-6320 Fax: 904/644-4968
Suncom Telephone: 284-6320 Suncom Fax: 284-4968


Sz zL- 4z o

-2zz- 03,g


#OF PAGES

;" CJ .7 t 37 F


FAX #.

FROM .r .'.1-"1 --

MESSAGE HP <6C A 6,.,4. 4..,,. L.:.,.i c i r v. eV -..L.)



e .. -.- -
^.^.-.J ^<--f ^.>-^ ^ *^v-* JL^ i **.u ^r^^^ Lt -- t(. i-_
^.f.f. {,Ax Allj~f^ a c4,t-.,c {^ t Ay/.1*(J ^ ____


\- 72 "17


p.,.,. < t:


DATE

" ITO


I-I e


--




FL.Conflict.Resolution Fax:904-921-9066


Water Supply Work Group
Proposed Final Decision Process

Definition of Consensus

The definition that the work group has been using is that "consensus," at
best, is when everyone is satisfied they have an acceptable, quality
product, and at worst, everyone feels their concerns have been considered
and they agree to not oppose the package.
Final Decision Rule

The Work Group's goal is to arrive at all substantive decisions on its
recommendations jointly by consensus of the core group members. In
instances where, after vigorously exploring possible ways to enhance the
support for a recommendation or the report as a whole, this is not
achievable, decisions will require support of at least a 80% vote of all core
group members present and voting.

Recommendation Review and Amendment Process
Single recommendations or sections will be considered:
1. Core members may offer amendments to a recommendation (other
participants should ask their representative core group member to
present their proposed amendments).
2. Amendments will be considered in accordance with Robert's Rules of
Order. An amendment, as amended, must be approved by 80% of the
core group members present.
3. The recommendation must then be approved by 80% of the core group
members present.
4. Amendments to other recommendations in the section will be
considered.
5. A vote will be taken on the section as a whole. It must be approved by
80% of the core group members present to be included in the final
report.
After the committees and/or wording resolution groups have had a chance
to formulate consensus amendments for recommendations that do not
receive 80% support the full group will reconvene to:
1. Consider the proposed amendments to recommendations
2. Revote on sections of the work group report
3. Vote on the package of recommendations as a whole (80% approval).


Jan 22 '97 17:44 P.02/03




FL.Conflict.Resolution Fax:904-921-9066


Jan 22 '97 17:44 P.03/03


Water Supply Development
and Funding Work Group Meeting

January 31, 1997

Proposed Objectives
* To seek consensus on development and funding committee
recommendations
* To agree on a strategy and responsibilities for interacting with
the legislature

Proposed Agenda

9:00 Work Group Plan for the Process and the Day
(including adoption of the group decision rule see attached)

9:15 Consider Amendments to Draft Recommendations
(Please propose amendments to the draft recommendations
attached that will enhance acceptability to you and others. These
will be considered at the funding committee meetings on the 29 th.
and 30 th. and the full work group meeting on the 31st.)

11:00 Meetings of committees and/or smaller wording
resolution groups (Lunch ordered in)

1:00 Consideration of Proposed Amendments from
Committees and/or Resolution Groups

2:00 Plenary Discussion of Next Steps


3:00 Meeting Adjourns




University of Florida Home Page
© 2004 - 2010 University of Florida George A. Smathers Libraries.
All rights reserved.

Acceptable Use, Copyright, and Disclaimer Statement
Last updated October 10, 2010 - - mvs