Title: Opinion File 72-11
CITATION PAGE IMAGE ZOOMABLE
Full Citation
STANDARD VIEW MARC VIEW
Permanent Link: http://ufdc.ufl.edu/WL00003320/00001
 Material Information
Title: Opinion File 72-11
Physical Description: Book
Language: English
 Subjects
Spatial Coverage: North America -- United States of America -- Florida
 Notes
Abstract: Buddy Blain's Collections - Opinion File 72-11
General Note: Box 14, Folder 3 ( Opinions 1972 - 1973 - 1972 - 1973 ), Item 5
Funding: Digitized by the Legal Technology Institute in the Levin College of Law at the University of Florida.
 Record Information
Bibliographic ID: WL00003320
Volume ID: VID00001
Source Institution: Levin College of Law, University of Florida
Holding Location: Levin College of Law, University of Florida
Rights Management: All rights reserved by the source institution and holding location.

Full Text






July 11, 1972

KEYWORDS: L
TO: MGG

FR: JWC

RE: Applicability of Chapter 287, FS to SWFWMD


The answer to the question presented necessarily involves
a determination as to whether or not SWFWMD falls within the
definition of "agency" as set out in 287.012. This section
defines agency to mean, "any of the various state officers,
departments, boards, commissions, divisions, bureaus, councils
and any other unit of organization however designated."
Strictly speaking, SWFWMD doesn't fall into any of these categories.

Additionally, 287.032 states that the purpose of the Division
of Purchasing is to "promote efficiency and economy. in the
purchase of commodities for the state." While SWFWMD is in a
sense a creature of the state, the above wording does not suggest
r that one of the purposes of 287 is the regulation of such a
unique public corporation as SWFWMD.

Some vight is given to this last statement when it is remembered
that the only state funds received by SWFWMD are through the
Water Resources Development Account, for the purpose of acquiring
land. The district pays its own bills; they are not paid by the
State Comptroller, as is the case with most state agencies.

You should be aware however, that Forbes Pioneer Boat Line v.
Board of Comm. 77 Fla. 742, 82 So 346 (1919), held that the
Everglades drainage was a public corporation, and, as such, a
governmental agency of the state "for certain definite purposes..."

The question presented in the case was that of tort liability,
but the reasoning could logically be extended.

Thus, while it seems desirable that SWFWMD regulate itself
by Chapter 287, it is not in my opinion, required to do so.


JWC: cs




University of Florida Home Page
© 2004 - 2010 University of Florida George A. Smathers Libraries.
All rights reserved.

Acceptable Use, Copyright, and Disclaimer Statement
Last updated October 10, 2010 - - mvs