Title: Opinion File 61-4
Full Citation
Permanent Link: http://ufdc.ufl.edu/WL00003215/00001
 Material Information
Title: Opinion File 61-4
Physical Description: Book
Language: English
Spatial Coverage: North America -- United States of America -- Florida
Abstract: Buddy Blain's Collections - Opinion File 61-4
General Note: Box 14, Folder 2 ( Opinion File 1961-1971 - 1961-1971 ), Item 3
Funding: Digitized by the Legal Technology Institute in the Levin College of Law at the University of Florida.
 Record Information
Bibliographic ID: WL00003215
Volume ID: VID00001
Source Institution: Levin College of Law, University of Florida
Holding Location: Levin College of Law, University of Florida
Rights Management: All rights reserved by the source institution and holding location.

Full Text

Mr. AEred M. McKethan
Page Two
October 3, 1961

opinion would be inapplicable. It is to be noted that the
recognition of this particular account as a service trans-
action rather than a contractual one, is based upon the
particular facts and circumstances involved and such
recognition is not intended to extend to any and all
banking transactions or relationships which may arise
between the governing body of the District and the named
bank. Each transaction will, under the test set forth
in the enclosed Attorney General opinion, of necessity
stand or fall on its own facts. In those situations
clearly determinable as a servicearrangement, it would
appear that your dual membership on the District Board
and as an officer of the bank would not be improper.
There may well be, however, situations where such would
not be the case.

With kind personal regards, I am

Richard W. Ervin
Attorney General

cc: Honorable Ray E. Green
State Comptroller

cc: Honorable Bryan Willis
State Auditor

University of Florida Home Page
© 2004 - 2010 University of Florida George A. Smathers Libraries.
All rights reserved.

Acceptable Use, Copyright, and Disclaimer Statement
Last updated October 10, 2010 - - mvs