Title: Water Resources Analysis Using Electronic Spreadsheets, Figure 5: Simulated vs. Measured Flows Heads at Well 4
CITATION THUMBNAILS PAGE IMAGE ZOOMABLE
Full Citation
STANDARD VIEW MARC VIEW
Permanent Link: http://ufdc.ufl.edu/WL00000701/00001
 Material Information
Title: Water Resources Analysis Using Electronic Spreadsheets, Figure 5: Simulated vs. Measured Flows Heads at Well 4
Physical Description: Photograph
Language: English
 Subjects
Spatial Coverage: North America -- United States of America -- Florida
 Notes
Abstract: Water Resources Analysis Using Electronic Spreadsheets, Figure 5: Simulated vs. Measured Flows Heads at Well 4
General Note: Box 7, Folder 1 ( Vail Conference 1987 - 1987 ), Item 94
Funding: Digitized by the Legal Technology Institute in the Levin College of Law at the University of Florida.
 Record Information
Bibliographic ID: WL00000701
Volume ID: VID00001
Source Institution: Levin College of Law, University of Florida
Holding Location: Levin College of Law, University of Florida
Rights Management: All rights reserved by the source institution and holding location.

Full Text





13. Ridington, R.W. and M.M. Williams. 1985. The Hidden Power
of Lotus 1-2-3: Using Macros, Brady Communications
Company, Inc. Bowie, Maryland.

14. Rouhani, S. 1985. Variance Reduction Analysis, Water
Resources Research, v. 21, no. 6. 837-846.

15. Sampson, R.J.1978. Surface II Graphics System, Kansas
Geological Survey Series in Spatial Analysis, No. 1,
University of Kansas, Lawrence, Kansas.

16. South Florida Water Management District. 1984. Permitting
Information Manual, Volume IV. Management and Storage of
Surface Waters, Resource Control Department, West Palm
Beach, Florida.

17. Tabios, G.Q. III, and J.D. Salas. 1985. A Comparative
Analysis of Techniques for Spatial Interpolation of
Precipitation, Water Resources Bulletin, v. 21, no. 3,
365-380.































34

S73s-






































400


0 100 200 300
DAYS (1979)


SIMULATED


MEASURED


Simulated vs Measured Heads at Well 4 (Heaney et al., 1986).


Figure 5.










Antonio are good. The most sensitive calibration parameters are

the storage coefficient and the rain gage weighting factors.

The results of these simulations are instructive in two

ways. First, they indicate that sets of plausible parameter

estimates can be found for this study area such that a good

simulation of the surface-groundwater hydrology can be obtained.

Secondly, it is also apparent that this solution is not unique.

Many other combinations of parameter estimates could have

provided similar or even better solutions. Thus, it is important

not to take these results too literally.

While it is possible to develop a very large surface-

groundwater model that could give much improved temporal and

spatial information, it appears to be more beneficial to use a

spreadsheet analysis approach to conform to the local problem.

The basic idea is to focus the effort on those components of the

hydrologic cycle that are most important for this area and this

problem. Also, the sophistication of the modeling should depend

on the available data. Lastly, it is very desirable to use

models that can be understood and used by technical people who

are not computer experts.

This model does sensitivity analysis very well. The user

only has to change the assumed parameter estimates) and the new

answer is automatically recalculated in about ten seconds. Thus,

it is possible to run a few hundred test cases in a single day.

These tests can be run by the experts who are most knowledgeable

about the technical aspects of the problem. The sensitivity


30


5.3/









analysis shows the limits of accuracy that are achievable, and

that it is possible to get reasonable calibrations with numerous

plausible assumptions regarding the parameter estimates.

SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS

The microcomputer has revolutionized the way that

engineering problems will be analyzed in the future. The

electronic spreadsheet is the most popular piece of computational

software for microcomputers. The spreadsheet can be considered

to be a giant sheet of electronic paper, capable of data

manipulation, mathematical and statistical calculations, and

graphics. With a wide variety of commands, automated functions,

and programming options, the electronic spreadsheet allows the

user to quickly perform tasks on a single file that would other-

wise require hours of hand calculations and reams of paper. This

paper has described how these spreadsheets can be used to solve a

variety of water resources problems. These applications are

summarized below.

Data may be easily imported, exported, and stored on spread-

sheets, and can be manipulated in a variety of ways through the

use of the many functions and commands. Of particular use are

the Copy and Move commands that allow quick data entry,

maneuverability, and analysis. Other commands that allow a

variety of analytical techniques are the Data and Graph commands.

By using a variety of spreadsheet options, well organized and

fully documented knowledge bases can be constructed. Each type of
data may be reserved as a separate file, with all references,


31

s32










explanations, and local data maps. Elementary statistics may

also be included in the knowledge base, and the data may be

exported for use in other computer programs. This spreadsheet

data handling technique was used in a large hydrologic study in

Florida with much success.

The spreadsheet may be used as a pre- and/or post-processor

for main-frame computer models. Alternatively, spreadsheets can

be used to create simpler hydrologic models that are not only

easy to understand, but can be customized to the local

conditions. Spreadsheet models constructed on the Lotus 1-2-3

spreadsheet include a runoff simulation, flood routing

simulation, and a continuous surface-groundwater model.

Copies of the spreadsheet files used in this paper can be

obtained by sending a check for $10.00, payable to the University

of Florida.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

The original impetus for this paper was a water resources

study sponsored by the Southwest Florida Water Management

District, Brooksville, Florida. Subsequent phases of the study

were supported by Florida Water Resources Research Center under

the USGS Water Institute program. Numerous ideas on how to use

spreadsheets were generated by Professor Wayne C. Huber and

graduate students working on related problems, including Wayne C.

Downs, S. Wayne Miles, Thomas G. Potter, and Robert C. Dickinson.
We thank them for their support. Lastly, we would like to

acknowledge the helpful suggestions of the referees.


32


5733









APPENDIX-REFERENCES


1. Anderson, D. and D.F. Cobb. 1984. 1-2-3 Tips, Tricks, and
Traps, Que Corporation, Indianapolis, Indiana.

2. Cruetin, J.D. and C. Obled. 1982. Objective Analysis and
Mapping Techniques for Rainfall Fields: an Objective
Comparison, Water Resources Research, v. 18, no. 2, 413-431.

3. Golden Software. 1985. Golden Graphics Systems, Version
2.00, Golden Software, Golden, Colorado.

4. Hancock, M.C. 1986. Analysis of Water Resources Problems
Using Electronic Spreadsheets. Publcation No. 92,Florida
Water Resources Research Center, University of Florida,
Gainesville, Florida.

5. Heaney, J.P., W.C. Huber, W.C. Downs, M.C. Hancock, and C.N.
Hicks. 1986. Impacts of Development on the Water Resources
of Cypress Creek North of Tampa, Florida Water Resource
Research Center, Report No. 89, University of Florida,
Gainesville, Florida.

6. Hicks, C.N. 1985. Continuous Simulation of Surface and
Subsurface Flows in Cypress Creek Basin, Florida, Using
Hydrological Simulation Program-Fortran (HSPF). Master's
Thesis, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida.

7. Johnson, L.E. 1986. Water Resource Management Decision
Support Systems, Journal of Water Resources Planning and
Management, ASCE, V. 112, No. 3, July, 308-325.

8. LeBlond, G.T. and D.F. Cobb. 1983. Using 1-2-3, Que
Corporation, Indianapolis, Indiana.

9. Lotus Development Corporation. 1985. Lotus 1-2-3. Release
2, Cambridge, Massachusetts.

10. McDonald, M.G. and A.W. Harbaugh. 1984. A Modular Three-
Dimensional Ground-Water Flow Model. USGS, Reston, Virginia.

11. Miles, S.W., J.P. Heaney, W.C. Huber, and T.G. Potter.
1986. Application of Lotus 1-2-3 to SWMM Preprocessing.
Proc. Fourth Conference on Computing in Civil Engineering,
Boston.

12. Olsthoorn, T.N. 1985. The Power of the Electronic
Worksheet: Modeling Without Special Programs. Ground Water
Journal, v. 23, no. 3, 381-390.




33




University of Florida Home Page
© 2004 - 2010 University of Florida George A. Smathers Libraries.
All rights reserved.

Acceptable Use, Copyright, and Disclaimer Statement
Last updated October 10, 2010 - - mvs