Presidential leadership in Latin America


Material Information

Presidential leadership in Latin America the cases of Bolivia, Dominican Republic and Peru
Physical Description:
1 online resource (498 p.)
De la Quintana, Ana María
University of Florida
Place of Publication:
Gainesville, Fla.
Publication Date:

Thesis/Dissertation Information

Doctorate ( Ph.D.)
Degree Grantor:
University of Florida
Degree Disciplines:
Political Science
Committee Chair:
Anderson, Leslie E
Committee Members:
Dodd, Lawrence C
Schwartz, Katrina Z. S.
O'dwyer, Conor
Dallery, Jesse


Subjects / Keywords:
america -- bolivia -- democracy -- dominican -- latin -- peru -- politics -- presidents -- republic
Political Science -- Dissertations, Academic -- UF
Political Science thesis, Ph.D.
Electronic Thesis or Dissertation
bibliography   ( marcgt )
theses   ( marcgt )
government publication (state, provincial, terriorial, dependent)   ( marcgt )


This dissertation addresses the interplay between democracy and its actors. It seeks to answer the question on how the politics of presidential power can advance or setback new democracies. By looking at three presidents in three Latin American countries who in turn exercised the presidency twice non-consecutively, it argues that experienced leaders are not necessarily good for democracy. The idea that leadership is key for democracy has a long tradition in the study of politics. It is easy to see the absurdity of the belief in the healing power of leadership - it is strong belief in the power of one - but people fall for it again and again and they are not entirely wrong to do so. If it is a mistake to think that a leader can mend a country, the opposite is also false. That is, leaders are irrelevant to our lives. By placing the presidencies in a larger historical context this dissertation traces the evolution of a political order happening in a democratizing country and observes the structural opportunities and constrains presidents have. It argues that seldom do historical conditions present themselves so that a president has the opportunity to have a deep impact in democracy. While virtually all presidents seek to differentiate from the previous administration, all of them seek to affirm their authority and to transform politics; all of them do so in different ways. However, most of them contribute only marginally. By analyzing presidents’ leadership styles based on personality traits at two different times, this dissertation evaluates key actors capacity for democratic political learning. It argues that experienced presidents do not always respond adequately to new developments. They do not act in the best interest of the people. Unless they adapt their leadership styles and keep in tune with the demands of the current conditions, there is no guarantee that experience leads to an effective presidency.
General Note:
In the series University of Florida Digital Collections.
General Note:
Includes vita.
Includes bibliographical references.
Source of Description:
Description based on online resource; title from PDF title page.
Source of Description:
This bibliographic record is available under the Creative Commons CC0 public domain dedication. The University of Florida Libraries, as creator of this bibliographic record, has waived all rights to it worldwide under copyright law, including all related and neighboring rights, to the extent allowed by law.
Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of Florida, 2012.
Adviser: Anderson, Leslie E.
Statement of Responsibility:
by Ana María De la Quintana.

Record Information

Source Institution:
Rights Management:
Applicable rights reserved.
lcc - LD1780 2012
System ID:

This item has the following downloads:

Full Text




2 2012 Ana Mara De la Quintana


3 To Anita, Marcelo and Miki


4 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS During the making of this dissertation as w ell as during my graduate years the most important people who were unconditionally supporting me were my parents. I am and mother Marcelo and Anita kept me going, withou t their love, encouragement, and support a Ph.D. would not have been possible. I am greatful to m y siblings Jimena and Roberto and to my extended family Ana Cristina, Eddy, Csar and Olga for believing in me and making sure I reach my goal. M y advisor, L eslie Anderson was always supportive of me in my quest to focus on relevant questions, her advice not only help ed me seek for the most rigorous ways of addressing my inquires but also stimulated me so I did not to shy away from useful and valuable scholar ship. She is certainly a wonderful adviser and academic mentor. T he members of my committee: Larry Dodd, Katrina Schwartz, Connor O'Dwyer, Jesse Dallery have been invaluable to me in helping me to improve this dissertation, their advice and encouragement s upported me in this journe y I am thankful t o my wonderful professors and friends Richard Scher, Aida Hozic, Richard Conley, and to all my devoted professors at the Department of Political Science at the University of Florida in particular to Philip Willi ams, Ben Smith, Patricia Wood, Lynn Leverty, Be th Rosenson and Goran Hyden. Sue Lawless Yanchisin and Debbie Wallen are the soul of the department with their professionalism, warmth and friendship they helped me navigate the agitated waters during my grad uate years I want to thank m y friends and colleagues for enriching my life and reminding me that life is more important than work and the world of ideas: Yael Harari, Evelina Jagminaite, Aaron Hale, Majid Sharifi, Karina Vazquez, Parakh Hoon, Jonathan Jo nes,


5 Javier Aguayo, Guillermina Seri, Miriam Mutmabudzi, Greg Markowski, Sonia Ruiz, Eric Moody, Kenly Fenio, Fredline McComack, Iran Rodrigues, Jonathan Wadley, Matt Caverly, Norman Loayza, Ximena del Carpio, Andy Loomis, and Jason Parker My friends Ta tiana Ergueta, Viviana Novillo, Carmen Machicado, Todd Walters, Majid Gorji, Harry Abu Saeedi, Valeria Di Fiori, Victorio Carpintieri, Pilar and Thomas Kohler, Teresa and Carlos Pacheco, C esar Carranza, Patrick Terrell, Mary Dager Luis Azurduy and Marjan ne Sevenant, Maria Elba de Grandchandt, Janee Rambocous, Krissi Mevis and Fernando Quiros kept me sane and helped me in ways that I cannot even describe, thank you Cutolo, Esperanza Lagabaster, Eva Gutierrez, Minna Matero and Mariana Wettstein, contriburted enormously with their friendship, camaraderie helping me get some balance my life S pecial thanks to Kitty Williams, my editor and friend and one of the kindest persons I know. Throughout the fiel d research I received great cooperation from Bolivia, Peru and Dominican Republic political leaders in granting interviews. When one is dealing with political issues such as those presented in this dissertation the question of whether or not to reveal sour ces immediately arises. There is an apprehension between a simultaneous desire to both recognize and protect, all of which has prompted me to divide these sources into two groups. The first group is comprised of party functionaries, members of government, shared with me their personal opinions about their president and thankful t o these individuals for agreeing to be interviewed; they are not identified by name here. Th e second group is comprised of those who went above and beyond the


6 call of duty to ensure that I found appropriate information and various types of records. On specific details mentioned in this dissertation, I appreciate the help of Frank Moya Pons in the Dominican Republic and Richard Webb in Peru. Last but not least this dissertation is dedicated to my husband Miguel Angel Ostos. Miki you are my rock. I do not have enough words to thank him, his contributions I cannot possibly describe accurately. He a allowed me to finish this dissertation. Without him I would have given up on this dissertation long ago and probably tortured myself for the rest of my life. This dedication is but a small reward for all of his love patience, and forgiveness. I hope that Amelia, who was born as this dissertation was on its making, will read it someday with interest and amusement.


7 TABLE OF CONTENTS page ACKNOWLEDGMENTS ................................ ................................ ................................ .. 4 LIST OF TABLES ................................ ................................ ................................ .......... 11 LIST OF FIGURES ................................ ................................ ................................ ........ 13 ABSTRACT ................................ ................................ ................................ ................... 14 CHAPTER INTRODUCTION ................................ ................................ ................................ ........... 16 Research Questions ................................ ................................ ............................... 19 Argument ................................ ................................ ................................ ................ 19 Importance ................................ ................................ ................................ .............. 23 Methods, Case Selection and Source Materials ................................ ..................... 26 Plan ................................ ................................ ................................ ......................... 36 PRESIDENTIAL POLITICS ................................ ................................ ........................... 41 Definition of Leadership ................................ ................................ .......................... 41 Political Leadership and Democracy ................................ ................................ ....... 44 The Study of Political Leadership ................................ ................................ ........... 52 Presidential Leadership in Democracies ................................ ................................ 54 America n Presidential Studies ................................ ................................ ................ 57 Skowronek's Approach to Presidential Leadership ................................ ........... 63 ................................ ................. 72 Discussion ................................ ................................ ................................ .............. 81 PRESIDENTIAL POLITICS IN LATIN AMERICA ................................ .......................... 86 Discussion of Presidentialism ................................ ................................ ................. 86 The Presidentialist Tradition in Latin American Studies ................................ .......... 88 Discussion ................................ ................................ ................................ ............ 106 PRESIDENCIES ................................ ................................ ................................ ... 109 Popular Nationalistic Political Order ................................ ................................ ...... 111 The Hernn Siles Disjuctive Presidency (1982 1985) ................................ .... 113 Neoliberal Political Order ................................ ................................ ...................... 1 18 The Victor Paz Estens soro Reconstructive Presidency (1985 1989) ............. 121 The Jaime Paz Zamora Articulative Presidency (1989 1993) ......................... 127 The Gonzalo Snchez de Lozada Articulative Presidency (1993 1997) ......... 131


8 The ADN Administration: The Articulative Presidency of Hugo Banzer and Jorge Quiroga (1997 2002) ................................ ................................ ......... 144 The Gonzalo Snchez de Lozada Disjuctive Presidency (2002 2003) ........... 153 Discussion ................................ ................................ ................................ ............ 179 GONZALO S NCHEZ DE LOZ S LEADERSHIP STYLES ................................ .. 189 About Gonzalo Snchez de Lozada ................................ ................................ ..... 190 Leadership Style ................................ ................................ ................................ ... 192 Constraints ................................ ................................ ................................ ..... 192 ................... 193 d influence ................................ .................... 196 Information ................................ ................................ ................................ ..... 198 ................................ ................................ 201 confidence ................................ ................................ .......... 203 Motivation ................................ ................................ ................................ ....... 208 .................. 210 Degree of in group bias ................................ ................................ ........... 210 Discussion ................................ ................................ ................................ ............ 215 ENCIES ................................ ........ 219 Clientelistic Political Order ................................ ................................ .................... 220 The Antonio Guzmn Preemptive presidency (1978 1982) ............................ 228 The Salvador Jorge Preemptive presidency (1982 1986) .............................. 233 The Joaqun Balaguer Articulative presidency (1986 1990) ........................... 237 The Joaqun Balaguer Articulative presidency (1990 1994) ........................... 240 The Joaqun Balaguer Articulative Presidency (1994 1996) ........................... 244 The Leonel Fernndez Articulative Presidency (1996 2000) .......................... 250 The Hiplito Meja Articulative Presidency (2000 2004) ................................ 270 The Leonel Fernndez Articulative Presidency (2004 2008) ......................... 277 Discussion ................................ ................................ ................................ ............ 291 ................................ .......................... 300 About Leonel Fernndez ................................ ................................ ....................... 301 Leadership Style ................................ ................................ ................................ ... 303 Constraints ................................ ................................ ................................ ..... 303 ................... 303 ................................ .................... 306 Information ................................ ................................ ................................ ..... 310 ................................ ................................ 311 confidence ................................ ................................ .......... 313 Motivation ................................ ................................ ................................ ....... 318 .................. 319 Degree of in group bias ................................ ................................ ........... 321 Distrust of others ................................ ................................ ...................... 324


9 Discussion ................................ ................................ ................................ ............ 326 .................. 333 Oligarchic Political Order ................................ ................................ ...................... 334 Popular Nationalistic Political Order ................................ ............................... 337 The Fernando Belaunde Preemptive Presidency (1980 1985) ....................... 340 The Alan Garca Disjuctive Presidency (1985 1990 ) ................................ ...... 346 Neoliberal Political Order ................................ ................................ ...................... 358 The Alberto Fujimori Reconstructive and Articulative Presidencies (1990 2000) ................................ ................................ ................................ ........... 360 The Valentn Paniagua Articulative Presidency (2000 2001) ......................... 368 The Alejandro Toledo Articulative Presidency (2001 2006) ............................ 369 The Alan Garca Articulative Presidency (2006 2011) ................................ .... 375 Discussion ................................ ................................ ................................ ............ 386 ALAN GA ................................ ................................ ... 400 About Alan Garca ................................ ................................ ................................ 400 Leadership Style ................................ ................................ ................................ ... 402 Constraints ................................ ................................ ................................ ..... 402 ................... 403 ................................ .................... 407 Information ................................ ................................ ................................ ..... 410 ................................ ................................ 412 elf confidence ................................ ................................ .......... 413 Motivation ................................ ................................ ................................ ....... 415 .................. 415 Degree of in group bias ................................ ................................ ........... 418 Trust vs. distrust ................................ ................................ ....................... 422 Discussion ................................ ................................ ................................ ............ 423 CONCLUSIONS ................................ ................................ ................................ .......... 429 Results ................................ ................................ ................................ .................. 432 Disjunctive Presidencies ................................ ................................ ................. 432 Articulative Presidencies ................................ ................................ ................ 433 Reconstructive Presidencies ................................ ................................ .......... 434 Personality Traits ................................ ................................ ............................ 434 Leadership Styles ................................ ................................ ........................... 437 Political Learning in Democratizing Countries ................................ ....................... 441 Other Cases ................................ ................................ ................................ ... 445 Final Observations and Contributions ................................ ................................ ... 448 APPENDIX VARIATION IN DEMOCRATIZATION VARIABLES IN LATIN AMERICAN COUNTRIES ................................ ................................ ................................ ......... 455


10 DATA COLLECTION ................................ ................................ ................................ ... 456 SEMI STRUCTURED INTERVIEW GUIDE FOR PRESIDENTS ................................ 460 SEMI ........ 462 SEMI STRUCTURED INTERVIEW GUIDE FOR SCHOLARS, ANALYSTS, JOURNALISTS ................................ ................................ ................................ ..... 463 LIST OF REFERENCES ................................ ................................ ............................. 46 4 BIOGRAPHICAL SKETCH ................................ ................................ .......................... 498


11 LIST OF TABLES Table page 2 1 ............................... 83 2 2 ................................ ... 84 2 3 ................................ ................... 85 3 1 Presidential leadership in American Politics and Comparative Politics ............. 108 4 1 Bolivia Presidents, types of presidencies and political orders (1982 2003) .... 182 4 2 Bolivia Economic performance variables: economic activit y, fiscal sector and inflation (in percentages) ................................ ................................ ........... 182 4 3 Bolivia Economic performance variables: population, employment and income ................................ ................................ ................................ .............. 183 4 4 Bolivia Seats by party (1980 2002) ................................ ................................ 184 4 5 Bolivia Vote share by party blocks in general elections 1985 2002 (in percentages) ................................ ................................ ................................ ..... 184 4 6 Bolivia Vote share by party in presidential elections 1980 2006 (in percentages) ................................ ................................ ................................ ..... 185 4 7 Bolivia Electoral data in presidential elect ions (1980 2002) ............................. 185 5 1 ......... 218 6 1 Dominican R epublic Presidents, types of presidencies and political orders (1978 2008) ................................ ................................ ................................ ...... 295 6 2 Dominican Republic Vote Share by party in presidential elections (1978 2008) (in percentages) ................................ ................................ ..................... 295 6 3 Dominican Republic Seats by party (1978 2010) ................................ ........... 296 6 4 Dominican Republic Electoral data in presidential el ections (1978 2008) ...... 296 6 5 Dominican Republic Economic performance variables (in percentages) (1990 2008) ................................ ................................ ................................ ...... 299 7 1 ........................... 332 8 1 Peru Presidents, types of presidencies and political orders (1980 2011) ....... 390


12 8 2 Peru vote share by party in presidential elections 1980 2006 (in percentages) 390 8 3 Peru Seats by party (1980 2006) ................................ ................................ ... 391 8 4 Peru Vote share by party in municipal and regional elections 1980 2010 (in percentages) ................................ ................................ ................................ ..... 392 8 5 Peru Economic performance varia bles: economic activity, fiscal sector and inflation (1981 2011) (in percentages) ................................ .............................. 393 8 6 Peru Electoral data in presidential elections 1980 2006 ................................ .. 394 8 7 Peru Economic performance variables: population, employment and income (1981 2011) ................................ ................................ ................................ ...... 396 8 8 Peru Economic performance variables: social secto r (1981 2010) ................ 399 9 1 ................................ .... 428 10 1 Presidents in political and secular time ................................ ............................. 453 10 2 ................................ ....... 453 10 3 s as a response to constraints, information and motivation ................................ ................................ ................................ ......... 454 10 4 Presidencies, presidents and democratization ................................ ................. 454


1 3 LIST OF FIGURES Figure page 4 1 Bolivia Presidential approval rating (2001 2003) ................................ ............ 186 4 2 Bolivia Vice presidential approval rating (2001 2003) ................................ .... 186 4 3 Bolivia Presidential campaign vote tracking (2001 2002) ............................... 187 4 4 Bolivia Approval rating of government in general (2001 2003) ....................... 187 4 5 Bolivia Approval rating of opposition (2001 2003) ................................ .......... 188 6 2 Dominic an Republic Personal opinions of presidential performance (1991 2008) ................................ ................................ ................................ ................ 298 6 3 Dominican Republic Personal opinions of Leonel Fernndez (1994 2008) .... 298 8 1 Peru Approval ratings of Alan Garca as president of Peru during his first presidency (1985 1990) ................................ ................................ .................... 394 8 2 Peru Approval ratings of Al 1990) ................................ ................................ ................................ ................ 395 8 3 Peru Approval ratings of Alan Garca as president of Peru during his second presidency (2006 2011). ................................ ................................ ...... 397 8 4 Peru Presidential approval ratings (1985 2011) ................................ ............. 397 8 5 Peru (2006 2011) ................................ ................................ ................................ ...... 398


14 Abstract of Dissertation Presented to the Graduate School of the University of Florida in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy PRESIDENTIAL LEA DERSHIP IN LATIN AMERICA: THE CASES OF BOLIVIA, DOMINICAN REPUBLIC AND PERU By Ana Mar a De la Quintana December 2012 Chair: Leslie Anderson Major: Political Science This dissertation addresses the interplay between democracy and its actors. It seeks to answer the question on how the politics of presidential power can advance or setback new democracies. By looking at three presidents in three Latin American countries who in turn exercised the presidency twice non consecutively, it argues that experienc ed leaders are not necessarily good for democracy. The idea that leadership is key for democracy has a long tradition in the study of politics. It is easy to see the absurdity of the belief in the healing power of leadership it is strong belief in the power of one but people fall for it again and again and they are not entirely wrong to do so. If it is a mistake to think that a leader can mend a country, the opposite is also false. That is, leaders are irrelevant to our lives. By placing the presidenc ies in a larger historical context this dissertation traces the evolution of a political order happening in a democratizing country and observes the structural opportunities and constrains presidents have. It argues that seldom do historical conditions pre sent themselves so that a president has the opportunity to have a deep impact in democracy. While virtually all presidents seek to differentiate from the previous administration, all of them seek to affirm their authority and to transform


15 politics; all of them do so in different ways. However, most of them contribute only different times, this dissertation evaluates key actors capacity for democratic political learning It argues that experienced presidents do not always respond adequately to new developments. They do not act in the best interest of the people. Unless they adapt their leadership styles and keep in tune with the demands of the current conditions, there i s no guarantee that experience leads to an effective presidency.


16 CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION In July of 1995, at the to its excluded segments of society, especially the majority indigenous population, by implementing decentralization reforms that involved transferring decision making power and economic resources to rural and urban municipalities as well as to participat ory local communities. He aimed to integrate Bolivians in a way that the state would be closer to citizens, understanding their needs and providing better responses. Despite intense questioning of his intentions and policies, and facing growing public disc ontent that led to violent demonstrations by opposition political parties, leftist groups, labor were adopted. The process that led to the enactment and implementation of the decentralization reforms was not well received. Many skeptics maintained that the reforms were imposed by global powers and aimed to maintain the concentration of power and privilege in the hands of few Bolivians. Indeed, the so r However, they comprised policies that not only deepened liberal economic policies characterized by the transfer of partial ownership of state companies to the private sector but also included social and political policies that witnessed greater political participation at the local levels, enhanced representation at the national level, decentralized the country through regional governments and municipalities, and fostered soc ial development.


17 Snchez de Lozada, who was considered one of the richest individuals in the dominant white aristocracy, who even spoke Spanish with an American accent, was an unlikely redeemer for Bolivia, whose in digenous people comprise 70 % of the population. During those difficult days of reform, be kept out of the mainstream, because for many years my family was banne d from this country." 1 Until recently, these reforms were not only considered successful decentralization policies that changed the traditional distribution of resources and put marginalized rural areas on the map, but also touted as being responsible for the political dynamics Certainly, the reforms empowered citizens and contributed to build popular power at the local level, allowing the emergence of new leaders who have successfully challenged the status quo at the national and regional levels. Six years after the end of his first term in October 2003, Snchez de Lozada was administration. Unable to finish his second term, he resigned shortly after his first year in office. Snchez de Lozada aimed to provide Bolivia a secure and consistent source of income derived from the export of its vast natural gas reserves. But this required construction of a costly p ipeline to transport the gas to a seaport, where it would be liquefied and packed in a way that could be exported to energy hungry California, which had already expressed interest in buying gas and guaranteed loans for the construction 1 At age one, Gonzalo Snchez de Lozada moved to the U.S where his father Enrique served as a Bolivian diplomat of the Bol ivian legation. His family had to remain in the U.S. when in 1930 a military coup deposed the democratically elected president and political instability remained the norm. Snchez de Lozada returned to live in Bolivia when he was twenty one.


18 of the project. 2 Sn chez de Lozada planned to build it quickly and at the lowest cost in order to leave a working system and to receive credit for it. The immediate issue that led Snchez de Lozada's approval of the controversia l plan linking natural gas fields to a terminal on the Chilean coast, instead of a more costly alternative plan that involved a Peruvian route to the sea. Bolivians felt that the President chose economic considerations over historical wounds (Chile had tak underlying issue included several factors: first, the perception that the newly found vast gas reserves would mostly benefit foreign interests; second, the perception that Snchez de Lozada, his coalition and his collaborators, given their adherence to a but instead would benefit a coalition of interests that had long dominated the country; particularly since he started his second term in a very precarious position. Ultimately, constitu tional reform, which would have added direct democratic tools for citizens to decide important issues, cost him the presidency. At that time, he stated, decide over complex 3 During his short lived second administration, Snchez de Lozada tried to keep strategic policymaking strictly under his direction. Just as he did in his first term, he 2 During the p revious administration, the project was planned and negotiations with Chile and the U.S. started. However, no decisions were made because of the lack of time and the massive problems his administration faced. 3 Boyton, Rachel "Our Brand Is Crisis," docum entary 85 min. United States: Koch Lorber Films, 2005.


19 resisted change, given his understanding of the presidential role and his need to be in control. In his second presidency he lacked sensitivity to the political context, and he collided with political constraints which he viewed as something he could overcome. S ones he revealed during his first term. It is rare for powerful politicians in Latin America to rearrange politics so as to draw in those who are normally marginalized and exc luded. It is equally rare for the powerful to propose power sharing with the powerless, only to renege upon such progressive policies. And yet power sharing and inclusion are key ingredients for democracy to work in Latin America. Research Questions Wha t causes a leader to take visionary steps toward democracy, even when these are not in his immediate self interest and are not the actions we would normally expect? What causes a president to renege on his leadership steps? These are some of the questions that this dissertation addresses, which also include: why do presidents who return to office take divergent actions when conditions are similar? Conversely, which conditions make presidents take similar actions? Argument It is easy to see the absurdity o f the belief in the healing power of leadership it is strong belief in the power of one but people fall for it again and again and they are not entirely wrong to do so. If it is a mistake to think that a leader can mend a country, the opposite is also false. That is, leaders are irrelevant to our lives. Unlike the assumptions adopted by some scholars of Latin American politics who see presidential power as dangerous, I argue that presidential leadership is not necessarily detrimental to democracy. I con sider presidential leadership a unique opportunity to influence the


20 democratization processes. This is a calculated response based on individual assessment of the costs and benefits of presidential action at specific moments in time. Political leaders are successful when they can advance their political project by taking their mission to the public, when they are able to align their incentives with those of the people, understanding the needs of the times. Following Skowronek (1993) in this dissertation, resolve the inherently disruptive consequences of the exercise of their power: order shattering, order affirming, and order creating. Leaders deal with the paradox of destroying and saving, of affirming and repudiating. The recognition of the importance of political timing, as well as of how leaders think, needs to take a first row seat if we are to understand a) why democracies develop the way they do in Latin American countries, an In this dissertation I seek to identify the conditions under which presidents can positions with regards to their a dherence to politics as usual or their fight for change through their leadership styles and the influence in the development of events that require presidential a ction. A president is more likely to act in a certain way, that is to exercise a certain leadership style, when the different commitments of ideology and interests which presidents bring to the challenge of exercising power are challenged or threatened, wh en he is open to learn, and when normative dimensions are considered. In my research, I seek to unveil the positions and premises that individuals bring to accomplish meaningful political change. Individuals' leadership pretensions carried into


21 the presid ency infuse their tenure in office with political purpose. As opposed to rational choice explanations, I do not assume that presidents are merely self interested individuals. Ideology, values, traditions, and agenda are of consequence since they reveal the presidents are at the personal level, we can understand not only the motivations but also the strengths and weaknesses of their characters, all of which infuse every decision they m ake. I agree with Aberbach et al. (1975) that in order to understand elite behavior one has to make the basic assumption that political attitudes, values and beliefs are important determinants of the ways in which governments respond to social change and t o the pressures brought to bear on them by groups in society. By determining how presidents react to political constraints, how open they are to incoming information, and what motivates them to act, I predict what they are likely to urge on their administr ations. In order to understand their own perceptions of their roles in By looking at two time non consecutive presidents, I argue that the extent to which presidents are able to exerc ise leadership is constrained not only by the environment, but also by their own visions and their previous experiences in office. The paths they take do not guarantee democratic learning. 4 Indeed, there are presidents who make risky choices that can help expand possibilities or bring constraints to democracy in their countries the first time they assume office and have the opposite effect on the 4 Political learning at the individual level has been addressed as the most important source of democratic change (Balz 2010, McCoy 2000, Karl 1991). The stimuli in each individual's learning environme nt differ. The timing and nature of the learning experience may vary between individuals, as well as between political groups. The scope of the political groups that make up a society undergoing political learning is an important factor in predicting wheth er and when democratization will take place (Bermeo, 1992).


22 second presidency. Presidents with two non consecutive terms provide the possibility of polit ical learning, unlearning and over learning I hypothesize that, when first term presidents fail to engage in constructive democratic actions and they have the chance to become presidents for a second time, they reassume office humbled and become more fle xible in their actions; they learn the limits of their actions and therefore adapt to the constraining environment, getting to a point where they can even change their attitudes and perhaps their beliefs. The understanding of their personal limits is in it self beneficial to democracy, since it opens the door for negotiation, consensus and support seeking. Ultimately presidents are able to see opportunities for leadership working within the range of permissible choices. This type of case is what McCoy (2000) calls democratic learning which is the modification mistakes and capacity to change their political behavior. The positive impact of mocratization processes occurs when the country has an opportunity to deepen democracy as political leaders align their own incentives with those of the people, understanding the needs of the times, and they are able to engage in democratic learning. A se cond hypothesis looks at a converse situation: presidents whose leadership involved constructive democratic actions in their first term are likely to reassume office with an established vision. They become more conservative and try to control the pace of t he democratic learning of their societies. Second term presidents often find themselves at odds with the processes in which their societies are engaged, and their governance efforts may fail to deepen democracy, because social processes unfold


23 faster than changing political environment which imposes new challenges to their leadership. This type of case I call democratic unlearning 5 which is the inability of political actors to adapt to new situa tions, using the same vision and tools as in the past to deal with new incentives are at odds with those of the people, as presidents are unable to understanding the needs of the times and therefore incur in democratic unlearning. A third hypothesis considers presidents whose actions in both their first and second terms bring change to the de mocratic politics of their countries, but their imprint in the democratic history of their countries is less drastic than in the two previous cases. Their leadership actions are guided by situational boundaries and their own predispositions in incremental ways. This is the type of case that McCoy (2000) calls democratic over learning For her, it is a type of learning that impedes or slows subsequent learning for new situations. Importance issertation expands knowledge of the role of presidents in new democracies. As opposed to older democracies, which count on established liberal institutions, where changes tend to be gradual, where presidents are seen as leaders who operate in pluralist en vironments system; this dissertation seeks to illuminate knowledge of the role of presidents in developing democracies. Given the 5 Although not considered by McCoy, I argue that there could be cases were political actors do not learn; in fact they unlearn, as there is an inescapable likelihood of flawed performance.


24 the political system, making politics more dependent on their authority and decision making, than on interactions with sys The impact of presidential action on recognized. However, t he current lit erature in Latin American politics has not addressed presidential leadership systematically. Research on institutions such as the presidency, as well as on how cognitive processes affect political behavior, are subjects studied extensively in the United S tates but rarely in Latin America. However, as Latin America democratizes and democracy ages there, the study of leadership demands our attention. To date, all Latin American countries have chosen or stayed with a presidential system, making our understa nding of presidential leadership imperative. The choice of a presidential democracy, combined with the strong centralized historical tradition in Latin America, means that presidents, even when elected, wield extensive power and often face fewer checks on that power than is the case in older democracies. While there are few studies on Latin America focused on agency, there is a call to study the role of actors in political dynamics. There is a lack of analysis of the role of presidents and of presidential power in terms of how these key players of the political system lead their countries and of their impact on democratic politics. All over Latin America, presidents have played the role of both savior and endangerer in the history of their countries. Intere stingly enough, the prevalent trend in studies on the region has been to cast them as hellions regardless of whether they analyze leaders in individual biographies, testimonial accounts, or historical accounts. Very few studies have examined presidential action conceived as leadership, as the opportunity to further Latin


25 American democracy, despite all the attention that the region has received with regards to democracy, democratizations, transitions and consolidations. In fact, the initial optimism of the literature after the transition from authoritarian regimes has been obscured by theories positing the unfeasibility of certain Latin American countries to create and strengthen enduring liberal democratic institutions. The non evanescent delegative democr and 2002 ) delegative powers and no ho rizontal accountability. Moreover, the institutional design 1992; Mainwaring and Schugart 1997; Kenney 2004; Sondrol 2005) has also expressed concerns about the likelih ood of democratic consolidation in the region, since the presidential model only exacerbates the personalistic style of ruling. Mainwaring, limited due to several factors, including presidential systems that encourage populism and zero sum game competition that makes coalition building precarious. It is surprising to find little research devoted to addressing presidential leadership, and such research usually lacks the abi lity to explain democratic change across countries, more so in a comparative manner. The time is ripe and the region presents a surprisingly unexplored ground to study presidential leadership and its relation to the political order, as well as to the learn ing of democracy of the societies that presidents seek to govern. This dissertation fills that void; it is a comparative study of a small group of presidents who have been elected and then re elected non


26 consecutively in their countries. The dissertation addresses what circumstances matter and who counts when it comes to context of deepening liberal democracy. The personal power of the president stresses elements and strategies of power and interests without neglectin g the sources of that power: formal authority, hierarchical styles, as reflected in their political actions, are important parameters for democracies, since presidents h ave the capacity to impose, set limits, define what constitutes legitimate and illegitimate, direct inquiry and thought, influence the interpretation of events, and guide the framing of problems and the response to them. Moreover, the decisions presidents make, the way they conduct politics, the powers they have, their beliefs, their values, the norms these leaders hold, and the challenges they face, in addition to the discourse and image they create to secure legitimacy, all influence the way democracy dev elops in a country. Furthermore, they influence in distinct ways the Methods, Case Selection and Source Materials In this section the reasons for choosing historical institutionalism as the research strategy to guide this dissertation are explained. The selection of three presidents from three Latin American countries, who in turn exerted the presidency of their respective countries twice in a non consecutive manner in new democracies, is also explai ned. Finally, a case for the choice of source materials is made.


27 The nature and conceptualization of the research question largely determine the appropriate methods of data collection and analysis. 6 The political phenomenon of study in this dissertation is power. Since my interest is to explain the intersection between democracy in the making and presidential leadership, the level of analysis moves along agency, institutions and processes in time, with variables that consider individual actors (presidents a s key political players), decision making processes (choices made at critical junctures and in normal times and tactics, as well as strategies pursued by This is a theoretically informed historical research 7 with methodological emphasis on the sequence of events, particularly the timing of political actions. 8 Power relations in this dissertation are expressed in the roles of presidents in democratization processes as they make a p lace for themselves in history while trying to lead their countries in a democratic context. Even though it is recognized that presidential politics at any specific moment in time is, to a large extent, an extension of previous presidential politics, there is an emphasis on the causal significance of ideas, or more precisely of actors that in practice articulate and vindicate new ideas about their own roles in the politics of their countries. Presidents have particular readings of what is needed in the cou ntry. They come to office with particular skills and their actions have relevance as they rise to the occasion. For this reason the theoretical framework needs to be both flexible and 6 Polit ical methodologists have debated actively about the trade offs between political science methods, tools and levels of analysis. See for instance Almond and Genco (1977), Geddes (2003), King, Keohane and Verba (1994), and more recently; Laitin (2002) Brady and Collier (2004) and George and Bennett (2005). 7 I constructed an events data base that consists of all important events as covered repeatedly in the three main newspapers by country for each president throughout his term. This data base is similar to data bases of presidential actions that scholars of the U.S. presidency construct and use in order to understand presidential power. 8 For the importance of time in causal explanations for qualitative methods, see Bates et al. (1998) and Pierson (2004).


28 precise enough to allow comparisons and to capture micro political behav ior. Because of the questions this dissertation seeks to answer, the research strategy that was found most appropriate is historical institutionalism. The power of this analytical perspective is demonstrated along the way as episodes of presidential histor y are reinterpreted. When the political development of Bolivia, Dominican Republic and Peru is reviewed, the constant feedback and layering between: 1) political institutions and procedures, 2) social changes, and 3) presidential actions, are emphasized. B ecause the presidents of interest in this research exercised power in two separate terms, their goals and capacities may or may not have changed throughout time. This means that their goals and capacities may or may not have matched those of the society, o r that their capacities may not have been sufficient to achieve their goals. The case selection has both theoretical and methodological bases. Although this dissertation uses qualitative methods for the core of the analysis, it also takes a mixed methodolo gical approach, using combined qualitative and quantitative assessments for the selection of cases. Building from the Database of Political Institutions (DPI) (Keefer, 2001) that covers the total universe of countries with presidential systems in the world from 1975 to 2006, four variable s were added to the 113 countries coded with presidential systems, and the coverage was extended to 2008. 9 An assessment of the number of presidents who 1) were directly elected in competitive elections, 2) had a fixed term in office, and 3) assumed power twice non consecutively, revealed ten presidents in nine countries, five of which were remarkable cases of political leadership 9 Appendix A includes a list of all countries on the database. For the addition and coding of the variables, the author used: The Political Handbook of the World, Political Database from the Americas, worldstatesme n rulers cidob and psephos


29 in democratizing countries in Latin America. 10 Although it would have been ideal to be able to s tudy in depth the five presidents in the five countries, a selection was needed s President Leonel Fernndez. These cases represent to some extent the range of variation of democratic politics in Latin America. 11 The selected cases fulfill methodological concerns in order to assure causal temporal homogeneity and conditional independen ce. 12 The cases present variation in levels of democracy to avoid bias in the selection of the dependent variable. 13 There is variation within each case, which results in six term cases as well as variation across cases: 14 Gonzalo Snchez de Lozada of Bolivia with his first and second terms 1993 1997 and 2002 2003, respectively; Leonel Fernndez of the Dominican Republic with first and second terms 1996 2000 and 2004 2008, respectively; and Alan Garca of Peru, whose first term was 1985 990 and second term was 2006 2011. Degrees of democratization matter, especially in relation to presidential regimes, for life is clearly not the same under the government of a president who bypasses 10 From the 113 countries of the DPI, 9 countries with two term non consecutive presidents were Bolivia, Costa Rica, Dominican Republic, Lithuania, Madagascar, Nicaragua, Peru, Uruguay and Venezuela. The fact that seven countries are Latin American is the result of a regional natural bias. Only Venezuela, with Carlos A ndrs Prez Rodrguez and Rafael Caldera Rodrguez, has two presidents who governed twice non consecutively. However, Venezuela is not considered in this study since it is not a third wave democracy. Costa Rica was not considered either since it made its t ransition to democracy in 1949. 11 I focus on Latin America for several additional reasons. The region encompasses many of the early third wave democracies as defined by Huntington (1991) and updated by Munck (2007) and Hagopian and Mainwaring (2005). Even though each of the selected countries has a separate story to tell, most of Latin American countries are linked by a common historical and structural framework; they are part of a historical block. Additionally, they are characterized by constitutional arr angements that make the region have the most presidential systems in the world. They share similar colonial heritage and similar postcolonial influence and an average of two decades of electoral experience. All share a common international context confront ing the same external influences to different degrees. 12 For a discussion of case s election see Brady and Collier ( 2004) 13 For discussions of selection bias of the dependent variable, see King, Keohane and Verba (1992). 14 For case selection considerations see George and Bennet (2005), Ragin (2004), and Mahoney (2003a, 2003b).


30 parliament and rules by presidential decree, as life in more subtle forms of democracies that fail to protect an individual's autonomy and dignity, or life in democracies that and in different ways, these practices undermine and corrode d emocratization. This dissertation uses Polity IV and Freedom House democratization scores 15 to show variation within each case and variation across cases, considering the years before, during and after the terms of the handful of presidents who have been r eelected non consecutively during the third wave of democratization in Latin America. For the purposes of this dissertation when using the Polity IV scores, 16 a presidency is considered successful when the score changed from the previous year or when the sc ore increased showing positive variation at the end of the tenure. Utilizing the Freedom House scores, 17 a successful presidency occurred when, during the tenure of a president, the scores were unchanged from the previous year or decreased showing positive variation. A presidency is considered unsuccessful when the Polity IV score decreased from the previous year or during the term, showing negative variation. Likewise, the Freedom House scores have increased from the previous year, showing negative variatio n. An intermediate presidency is one in which neither of the Polity IV or Freedom House scores changed from the previous year in either the first or second term. 15 For Polity IV (2011), Freedom House (2011) scores for any year are based on the data from the previous calendar year. 16 For Polity IV, this dissertation used the variable polity2, that ranges from +10 (strongly democratic) to 10 (strongly autocratic). 17 For Freedom House this dissertation uses the variables political rights and civil liberties on a scale from 1 (most free) to 7 (least free). Depending on the ratings, the countrie s are then classified as "Free", "Partly Free", or "Not Free."


31 1997) is considered a successf ul presidency as it maintained consistently a high Polity IV score, which is the same as the democracy score of the year previous to his inauguration. During the first year of his fourteen month second presidency (2002 2003), henceforth called Snchez de Lozada II, the score decreased. His second presidency is therefore considered an unsuccessful presidency. The Freedom House scores increased during the second year of Snchez de Lozada I (i.e., his first presidency). In 1995 the status decreased from Free to Partially Free because of a state of emergency. The following year there was an increase in the civil liberties score. In 1996 the scores changed back to the ones in 1993 and 1994, but in 1997 they decreased by going back to those of the free status, a nd the political rights score improved. Given that the overall score in Snchez de Lozada I increased during his tenure, Snchez de Lozada I am considered a successful presidency. For Snchez de Lozada II, there was deterioration in the two years of his un finished presidency. Freedom House scores from the previous year to his first year increased in the political rights category. In 2002 there was a further increase and the status changed from Free to Partially Free. The overall assessment of Snchez de Loz ada II is an unsuccessful presidency. The Polity score for the first Fernndez presidency (1996 2000), called Fernndez I, increased dramatically signaling positive variation from the year previous to the start of his term, and remained with the same sco re until the end of the 2008), Fernndez II. Freedom House scores changed during Fernndez I from Partially Free to Free. Furthermore, both the political rights and the civil liberties scores decreased, signaling more fr eedom resulting in a


32 successful presidency assessment. During Fernndez II no changes occurred. Taken nor unsuccessful. In Peru, during the first Garca presidency (1985 19 90), Garca I, there was a positive variation in the Polity IV score for the last year of his term. Garca I am 2011), Garca II, maintained a consistent high score. As in Garca I, Garca II also is considered successful, since no increase was registered in Garca II. Freedom House scores for Peru decreased showing negative variation during his first presidency, changing from Free to Partially Free. There were also changes in the civil lib erties score. The two classifications of Polity IV and Freedom House provide contradictory results for Garca I: while Polity IV showed improvement of the democratic score, Freedom House showed deterioration of democracy in all its variables. Because of th e negative variation in Freedom House, in this dissertation Garca I is considered an unsuccessful presidency. During Garca II, none of the Freedom House scores changed. However there was a positive variation from his first to his second presidency. Moreo ver, the positive trend that started with Toledo was maintained during Garca II, making his second term a successful presidency. The three country cases included in this research represent to a certain extent the possibilities of successful and unsucces sful political leadership of new democracies, as evidenced by the variation over time in democratic scores. 18 Since the time periods 18 of Latin American leaders with two non consecutive terms during the Third Wave. The other two cases not analyzed in this dissertation, Nicaragua and Uruguay, have also experienced variation in each term. While scholars agree that Uruguay became a consolidated democracy in the 1980s, the case is considered a stable case as Uruguay has a long


33 in which these presidents governed in their respective countries differ considerably, the cases represent substantial varia tion in the democracy variable within the Latin American region. There is also variation over time within each case, as well as across the cases. A more thorough look at the democratic history of these countries also shows the different paths in the democ ratization processes they experienced. Bolivia, with its large indigenous population has remained until recently a limited representative democracy. The Dominican Republic has a mixed record of success in some important aspects of democratic governance, su ch as rapid economic growth, and deficiencies in others, such as widespread clientelism. It has a long tradition of an elite pacted democracy limited due to its rece nt background of democratic authoritarianism and the lack of development of robust and stable party politics. The collapse of the Fujimori administration has led to a significant opening in political competition. The post Fujimori administrations have perm itted a greater degree of political expression and have made a concerted effort to establish a more competitive electoral system. was to go behind the public policies, the media portraits and the carefully depicted public appearances to see what leaders actually do, to hear what they really think of their jobs, and to try to understand their goals and aspirations. I was able to interview personally two of the three presidents; wi th Gonzalo Snchez de Lozada I had four history of democratic experience previous to the authoritarian regime (1973 84) (Mainwaring and Perez Linan, 2008). Among Latin American nations, Nicaragua is a difficult case, having received low scores by Polity IV due to the difficulty to rank t he revolution and its aftermath. Furthermore it is also a country that exhibits pronounced shifts in Freedom House scores with regards to political rights and civil rights, while it has consistently remained a Partly Free country.


34 interviews in the space of three years (November 2007, August 2009, April 3 and 15 2010); with Leonel Fernndez, she held one four hour interview (July 2007). Unfortunately, I could not interview Alan Garca despite various attempts, yet I feel confident that the information gathered through interviews with people close to him allows her to make an informed assessment. As they talked openly about their jobs, their path to the top, and their hopes for their fellow coun trymen, I felt that I could at least penetrate behind the mask of inscrutability, which is the common perception of leaders. All other information gathered for the dissertation relied on interviews with people that were close to the presidents, either thro ugh work or through family and friendship connections. I also relied on interviews with persons who held the most diverse views on political phenomena: politicians, scholars, journalists and political analysts from both genders, who held public, private se ctor and NGO positions, and 19 The sample is purposive, and was consistent in the selection of the most diverse cases until the collection of data 19 The author received s ome institutional sponsorship in Peru (Instituto del Per, IDP) and the Dominican Republic (Fundacin Global Democracia y Desarrollo, FUNGLODE), but she was able to count on the help of key persons who facilitated her obtaining interviews with high profil e politicians, some holding public offices at the time when both Peru and Dominican Republic leaders exercised the presidency. Initially, it was extremely difficult to gain the attention from those targeted for interviews. Despite her informative requests and guarantees on the anonymity of the interviews, and credentials, for months she waited for responses with no positive results. Once she was referred by these key individuals she was treated cordially and was able to schedule interviews. Once she intervi ewed some high ranked government officials, she asked for their help to obtain interviews with other persons. The rest of the interviews were relatively easy to obtain as one interviewee contacted another. Because of time constraints associated with the le ngth of her research trips, she was not able to interview all the targeted persons. In the case of Bolivia, because of President S public discourse, obtaining interviews was more difficult. In most cases targeted individuals who held offices during S trust of individuals in order to obtain interviews. Proof of the difficulty in ge tting interviews is reflected in the time gaps between interviews. Since the author is Bolivian, she was able to use some personal and family connections in order to obtain some interviews. However, most interviewees asked not to be identified or to be con sidered off the record.


35 20 I also used secondary sources such as newspaper articles and public opinion data. 21 Fascinating characters in their own right, the three presidents allowed me to glimpse power through their eyes, and t o understand them as forces that shape democracy in Latin American countries. The case of Snchez de Lozada in Bolivia is a presidency, when Snchez de Lozada was able t o push his agenda and rally forces behind him, Snchez de Lozada II was a disaster, as he was not able to finish his term. Leaders are most vulnerable when they are most successful, because they stick to their formulas and refuse to see change as it is. So ciety learned about participation and decision The case of Leonel Fernndez in the Dominican Republic is a forceless leadership case; both of his presidencies made incremental and timid changes in democratic politics of his country. Fernndez lacked the energy and strength to move the pace of change faster. The successes were counterbalanced with the permissiveness he exhibited toward his party men, who focused on perfecting the clientelistic net works. The case of Alan Garca is the history of the phoenix firebird. By his own accounts he had a disastrous first presidency, with economic turmoil that traumatized Peruvians. His second presidency was the antithesis of the first, in terms of discourse 20 The author is aware of the problems, such as response validity and receptivity and reluctance of the respondents posed by relying on interviews as data (See Stouthamer Loeber and Van Kammen, 1995; Adler and Adler, 2002; Rubin and Rubin, 1995), as well as the problems of obtaining and conducting interviews (See Warren, 2002; Odendahl and Shaw, 2002; Peabody et al., 1990; Aberbach et al., 1975) 21 Details about the code, date, and importance of the interviewees and secondary data can be found in Appendix B.


36 policies, personnel and the economic results. It seems that Garca learned from his past and made sure he would not make the same mistakes. Plan The dissertation is organized in two parts. Part I is comprised of two chapters in which the main concepts and the theoretical framework of this dissertation are discussed. Chapter 2 discusses the concept of leadership. This concept is then applied to the political arena, and presidential leadership patterns are viewed within the theoretical frame offered by St ephen Skowronek. Leadership traits are assessed using on leadership in the U.S. presidency by scholars of the subfield. Chapter 3 discusses presidential leadership in Lat in America and its importance for new democracies, including a review of the existent literature on presidentialism and presidential action in the region, and identifying issues that this literature fails to address. Part II is comprised of six chapters, with two chapters for each of the three case terms, Chapter 5 focuses on a trait an administrations; Chapter 7 focuses on trait analysis of President Leonel Fernndez. chological traits.


37 Skowronek (1993) explains changes in the politics of the country (within one continuing democratic regime) as a function of the role of presidents, which in turn depends on their place in the sequential order they occupy in a political regime. However, in this dissertation, changes in the democratization of the country occur within different political orders, both as a function of the role of presidents, which is constrained by the force of the recurrent cycle of leadership in which they find with change. The slow moving changes that occurred in Bolivia, Peru and the Dominican Republic are described in Chapters 3, 5 and, 7 respectively, employing his torical institutionalist approaches. 22 The aim is to provide an understanding of the political order in place when the successive democratic presidents exercised authority. The cases of Bolivia and Peru start with a short narrative of the oligarchic politi cal order, followed by the popular nationalistic political order, and the neoliberal political order. The Dominican case is circumscribed in the logic of these orders, but its political order was unique since there was no breakdown. The unfolding of events was controlled by Joaqun Balaguer, who gradually adapted his leadership and the governing logic of the driven by internal events, but by international pressures. Whil e most of the scholarly work in Latin American democracy has focused on explaining the presidentialist system, political parties, and support for democracy at the 22 When making a case for the role of leadership in democratization processes, this dissertation pays particular attention to the narrative when describing the causal relations of the context for each of the cases (Bates, 1 998). The facts and explanations presented in the narrative, both at the methodological level and in the narrative style, are carefully selected and weighted, taking into consideration what S tarke (2010) considers are the criteria that make a good process tracing narrative.


38 public opinion level, this dissertation focuses on key presidential actions that contributed to the advances and setbacks of democracy. Considering that a democratic president is not the person chosen in a fair election, but also one who acts according to two important democratic principles: he does not attempt to extend the possibility to be imme diately reelected, and he increases the possibility of power sharing during his term. Although this dissertation acknowledges the importance of other institutions and int erest groups, the details of interactions such as decrees, veto points and executive orders are beyond the scope of this dissertation. In this dissertation, presidents Gonzalo Snchez de Lozada, Leonel Fernndez, and Alan Garca are assessed based on the a nalysis of personality traits in Chapters 4, 6 and 8, respectively. The aim is to understand the motivations behind their choices and strategies, as well as their successes and defeats, all of which are considered decisive to explain regime transformation. These chapters illustrate the importance of decisions taken by political actors at specific moments 23 in order to identify the challenges, difficulties and hindrances, as well as how these problems were addressed by the presidents. The explanations offered institutional factors and structural forces properly situating actors in macro historical trends. First, I introduce systematically sequences of macro structural and domestic structural components. Second, I introdu ce institutional parameters including, analysis of the macro structural and domestic structural levels incorporates structural explanatory variables and temporally re 23 In methodological terms these are critical junctures as well as both punctuations and equilibrium.


39 temporally proximate causes and specific features for each of the cases. The leadership level is analyzed at the end because it is the lowest level of aggregation and the range of possible outcomes is narrowest. In path dependence analysis, political institutions are of special importance because they serve as an intermediate level of analysis, since it considers the ca usal impact of actors on institutions and the causal impact of institutions on actors, explaining both the creation of institutions during critical junctures and the endurance of those structures after junctures. To assess the personal characteristics, pre ferences, motivation and decision making style of presidents, responsiveness to constraints, openness to information, and motivation. 24 When there is understanding of presidential preferences, the things that they believe in and work for and the way they go about making decisions, it is possible to learn about the images they portray in public. If there is something this dissertation tries to convey it is that there are neither def strategies and tactics, this research emphasizes how they self consciously (or not) deploy resources and modify (or not) their behaviors in response to the changes from their first to their second mandates. Each success involves new challenges, including learning (and over learning), and each defeat brings with it chances for political learning (and over learning). 24 According to Hermann leadership styles refers to the ways in which leaders relate to those around them and how they structure interact ions and the norms, rules and principles they use to guide such interactions (Hermann 2003:180).


40 The leadership of each president with non consecutive terms is analyzed via of the game and for horizontal and vertical mechanisms, and accountability for his acts. 25 Particular attention is paid to presidential acts that attemp t to take over legislative as the actions that slander and curb opposition, whether as political parties or in active civil society, step over freedom of speech and i gnore crimes against human rights. Attempts to seek reelection against the constitutional order in place are considered key conditions and at different points in time, the during his first and second terms; i.e. it is a comparison across time. This allows for investigation of political learning at the level of key political actors. Furthermore, while respect for institutions, politics, abilities, policy and judgment are important, a normative dimension needs to be considered as key for good leadership. The normative arguments require a leader to have a vision of a better country and the belief in the right thing to do (Anderson 2011:88 89). As a former UK Prime Minister argues, the supreme test for leadership is whether, in the final analysis, the leader puts the country first. It does not mean th at the leader does something people agree with or even what is objectively right. It means that the leader is ultimately prepared to put what he perceives to be the common good of the nation before his own political self (Blair, 2010). 25 Respect for the rules as the only the game in town as understood by Przeworski (1991: 26). Tanaka (2005) argues not mean compliance with each and every one of its laws, but the degree to which party actors behave strategically within the democratic limits.


41 CHAPTER 2 PRESIDENTIAL POLITIC S This chapter discusses the concept of leadership and the distinction between political leadership and leadership. In addition, it provides an overview of the ways political leadership has been studied, in particular preside ntial leadership. This chapter also discusses the utility of the framework offered by Stephen Skowronek with his leadership styles and personality traits for the purposes of t his dissertation. Definition of Leadership Leadership at the highest levels of complex social organizations has been an object of fascination and study in many disciplines. 1 Scholars, policymakers and pundits recognize human agency, particularly leadershi p, as key to understanding origins, transformation and prospects of outcomes, processes and institutions. 2 The concept of leadership is problematic as it is both socially (Morell, 2006) and relationally constructed (Elgie 1995). Political leaders are indi viduals and, as such, each one is unique. The concept of leadership is socially constructed since leaders require consent from those whom they govern and serve. It is relationally constructed since it involves a relationship between leaders and their insti tutional settings. While some scholars think of leadership as a position of authority given hierarchies, orderings and regulations, most agree that there could be no leadership without followers, without the influence of one person over others. Leaders and followers forge their relationship in a 1 Scholarly literature on leadership is found in disciplines and sciences as diverse as political science, psy chology, sociology, business and management studies, anthropology, history, military studies, education, and gender studies. 2 emphasize variabl Margaret Levi (2006) stressed leadership as one of the least understood ingredients in the study of dynamic theory of change.


42 particular circumstance. As a consequence, the type of context can ease or hinder the selection of the leader or the development of the relationship between leader and followers. Indeed, with regard to political lea dership, constituents opt for different types of leaders: in times of crisis than compared to the choice in times of peace (Hermann and Kegley, 1995); in democracies and in authoritarian political systems (Downs 1957, Key 1966, Fiorina 1981, Aldrich 1995, Nathan 2003, Levitsky and Way 2010, Slater 2010); in boom times and in recessions. They also choose leaders to guide revolutions or to institutionalize change (Bueno de Mezquita 2003, Hermann 2003). what events and decisions mean to people. By understanding their peoples and acting considering their well being, leaders legitimize their actions, and they develop a particular relation with their followers (Zalenik, 1992). As Machiavelli stated, a leade r should try to be both loved and respected, building a bond of affection that allows the leader to build up loyalty reserves, so when leaders make mistakes they get the benefit of the doubt or at least are able to muddle through in times of trouble. Ther e is no consensus about how to conceptualize and measure leadership for meaningful comparisons through time and across individuals. This may account for the numerous definitions of leadership that try to capture its nature with descriptive and normative ov ertones. 3 Given the uniqueness of individuals and circumstances, skeptics question if comparisons on leadership are possible at all, but without systematic comparison we are left with no system to mark the influence of leadership on societal outcomes. 3 For a compilation of various d efinitions of leadership see Yukl (2010).


43 A d efinition of leadership appropriate for the purposes of this dissertation was proposed by Richard Samuels: [leadership is] that constrained place where imagination, resources and opportunity converge. The imaginings need not be original to the leader, but he is the one who can control their use for his ends. The resources need not be entirely of her making, but she must be able to commandeer them for her own use. Opportunities will flow past individual entrepreneurs from time to time, and the successful lea der will seize them. Most important of all, the constraints need not be determinant, and the change need not be serendipitous. Determined individuals will demonstrate a range of creative ways to combine resources and ideas and to seize opportunity. 4 As por stresses the nature of a complex activity that requires balanced characteristics in diverse situations. As Zarefsky puts it, "there are no rules for sizing up a situation or respon ding to it; rather these skills are developed in particular contexts and through practice" (Zarefsky, 2002: 22). Leadership is about running a wave of continuous change. Since change involves risks, leaders must take risks, the things that make them uncomf Political leaders are ambitious themselves, and they send towering expectations and hop They are complicated individuals with complicated motives, ambitions, and with many flaws. They struggle with deep disillusionment that tests them personally and calls into question their abilities to succeed in their central political mission and in their own lives. They struggle and work intensely to carry forward their objectives, both the political rk and govern 4 Richard J. Samuels (2003:6) cited by Keohane (2005:707)


44 many of the choices they make. Democratic leaders act because they have a mandate to move forward with their projects that have been affirmed by voters. Keeping their promises is a matter of honor. But once in office they realize how difficul t it is to carry on their promises, and they face big political and economic forces that leave them weak and struggling to honor the mandate. In this regard, political leaders can change the terms of the debate precisely because they not only ride the poli tical tides, but sometimes they also create political waves in the sense that they construct and shape the political debate to make changes people are eager to see. Political leadership is not only about setting the terms of debate and establishing agenda s; it also involves guiding and educating citizens. Although leadership depends upon the relation between the leader and his people, it also has a normative connotation. Leaders are responsible for the outcomes his guiding actions produce. It is under the normative dimension, that the three Latin American presidents with two non consecutive terms are assessed in this dissertation. Political Leadership and Democracy Political le adership has a unique position among all forms of leadership, considering its saliency and its influence in polities such as states. Even though political leaders can be found at all levels of power, the most important are heads of state and government. 5 I ndeed, a great deal depends upon leadership, as countries, organizations and all sorts of collectivities place their hopes on individuals in order to develop and survive. Political leadership is a phenomenon of power, but not just any power. It entails the ability of one or a small number of individuals who are on top to 5 Elgie (1995:5)


45 encourage others to act. Such power is exercised on the society that affects ostensibly the destiny of mankind (Blondel 1987: 4 5). Political leadership involves a societal context that giv es authority to a particular person in order to make decisions and distribute resources. Those under that authority provide legitimacy to the person holding such an important role. No other person has the same opportunities and obligations. However, having power does not necessarily guarantee leadership. To be in a position of political leadership involves achieving some collective goal while being, in some way, responsive to followers. Many of the questions about political leadership refer to its meaning a nd its important role in society in helping overcome collective action problems. 6 Indeed, elections throughout the world intending to select the best statesmen are contingent upon judgments on how well candidates could lead at that point in time, given the and political rights. As demonstrated by many democracy scholars, leadership has been decisive for the establishment of democracy and for democratic consolidation. 7 extent that those who exercise power in the world and individual countries want it to de mocratization can hardly dispense with an analysis of how leaders arise and the in th e process have a great impact in enhancing or weakening the prospects of 6 See Elgie (1995:9), Brooker (1995:16 17) 7 Stefan (1978, 1996)


46 democratically elected or or iented leaders in state building and economic development 8 Bermeo also asserts institutions (2010). The asse rtion of leadership as a requisite in democracy stems from the need for political authority and direction, from everyday problems to strategic vision, in order to achieve collective purposes swiftly and efficiently. As Levi has correctly pointed out: [Demo cratic] leadership aligns incentives, helps design and redesign institutions, provides the learning environment that enables individuals to transform or revise beliefs, and plays a major role in inducing preferences. Most importantly, leadership both of go vernment and within civil society provides the human agency that coordinates the efforts of others 9 Indeed, leaders know that th ey sometimes need to compromise their principles; they recognize they often have to gratify special interests that have supported them. Leaders know that compromise is necessary to reflect the times so they can work with disparate interests that need to be held together. Furthermore they know that negotiation and compromise are essential to democracy. From the Nevertheless, citizens cons ider that leaders are legitimate and worth their trust when each citizen is assured that everyone is held to the same legal obligations, and when 8 See also Diamond et al. (1988). 9 Levi (2006: 10).


47 citizens get political goods in return for their acquiescence. Thus, democratic leaders need to be guarantors of egalitarianism. practical issues, even above theoretical reckoning. 10 Practical matters include establishing priorities, identifying problems, allocating precious resources choosing among courses of action and selecting those who will carry decisions forward. A pivotal issue here is the definition of what is important for a given country at a specific time. According to Schattschneider (1960:66) "he who determines what poli tics is about runs the country, because the definition of the alternatives is the choice of conflicts, and the choice of conflicts allocates power." A nother key feature of democratic leadership is vision, which inspires followers and other political actors who otherwise would not [vision] is a very difficult subject to study. Elusive, intangible, impossible to quantify, vision or the lack of it, lies at the very heart of good leaders their task a broad view of greater good have a power to sway us that they would not otherwise have. They can inspire us, energize us, rally us and urge us onward and in doing so they accomplish more than we can reasonably expect to understand by looking only at institutional context and constraints. Vision is key to good leadership and it allows leaders to go further and do more than they otherwise could do. 11 The link between leaders and followe rs is a symbolic frame through which leaders transmit their vision by influencing the interpretation of events and by guiding the definition of problems and the response to them. Leaders develop symbolic frames to rally people to support their agenda. Thes e frames are ubiquitous, providing people 10 cornerstone for successful presidencies; see Dorsey (2002). 11 Anderson (2011: 79 80)


48 with shortcuts for interpreting the world, for locating blame, and for proposing new courses of action (Pappas, 2008). Leaders consider that public sentiment is very important. Much of what elites attempt to do in new democratic regimes is heavily conditioned by their judgments of how ordinary people will behave (Rose, Mishler, and Haerpfer 1998; Bermeo 2003). For instance, consider how the high or low approval ratings of democratic presidents can shape their action s, the scrutiny of their decisions, the room for maneuver in their negotiations, and the influence on their political campaigns. It is usually assumed that political leadership has a positive connotation, that political leadership is something admirable. B ecause leaders have tended to be held in high status, sometimes they are attributed hero qualities. 12 But it is also true that leadership brings opportunities to accomplish terrible deeds and that leaders can be dangerous creatures. Thus, societies have dev power. Even autocratic leaders, dictators and tyrants who seem to have complete control, are responsive to some degree to others who help keep them in power and in their positions. 13 Throughout history, scholars, philos ophers and political observers have discussed the ways in which leadership can be controlled. Perhaps the best known analysis of leadership is the systematic study of leaders drawn from history in The Prince He holds a pessimistic view about the nature of man, and this pessimism is exacerbated when considering leadership. Law originates from this danger 12 extraordinary indiv iduals. 13 See Gandhi and Przeworski (2007) maintain that authoritarian rulers also rely on political institutions by soliciting the cooperation of outsiders to avoid the threat of rebellion.


49 modern studies of political leadership have aimed to understand the nature, opportunities and constraints of political leadership. 14 T he rel ationship between leadership and democracy has often been viewed as challenging since the preeminence and power of leaders can pose a threat to the democratic norms of equality, liberty and representation. There is a fundamentally anti democratic nature in leadership. Because leadership entails relationships, its unbalanced influence 2010). Furthermore, the democratic dilemma is exacerbated by the discretionary power leaders u se in order to provide solutions. In modern liberal democracies the claim is that nobody rules not the people, not the government, not the executive at the most, it is thought that i n democracy executive power is exercised in the name of someone. Repre sentative democracy is characterized by the protection of individual rights and liberty, and it emphasizes popular sovereignty as a particular feature of the relationship between leaders and followers. Moreover, in liberal democracies citizens elect leader s who represent their interests. The assumption is that linkages of accountability and responsiveness work 15 Leaders are expected to act in the best interests of the people. Democratic norms of accountability help keep the legitimacy and viability of the political system from being undermined by distributional conflict among social and economic actors. Furthermore, since they want 14 For a thorough discussion on the dangers of leadership see Bl ondel (1993). 15 Kitschelt (2000) correctly points out that new democracies often have direct exchange linkages, such as personal charisma of political leaders and selective material incentives (clientelism).


50 to be reelected leaders are accountable to the people. As put not governments perform well, citizens must perceive that their elected leaders are governing in a clean, transparent, and effective way, and above all, that their voices are ng in one's own name is that all exercise of power is thought to be unjust, and therefore no one wants to claim responsibility for it. The resistance to ruling and being ruled lies in human nature, which is why liberal democratic theory justifies executive power by arguing that the president is formally an agent, while the people are the principal. 16 Representative democracies assume that leaders represent and act considering the interests of their followers. Yet, as many scholars have argued, leaders have their own goals and do not necessarily follow those of their constituencies (Przeworski et al., 1999). In addition citizens cannot Democracies have developed constraint mechanisms against use of discretiona ry power, particularly executive power, in the form of institutional configurations. 17 The very concept of democratic leadership entails the need of a license to provide guidance with actions that can only be assessed ex post. In times of crisis the need fo r strong leadership with discretionary power that grasps the larger picture is even more pronounced, as the polity expects rapid solutions to alleviate suffering. 18 However, the concept of leadership possesses most meaning under conditions of institutional and political constraint. Without constraint, the concept of 16 Fukuyama entertains an interesting account of the need of humans to dominate (1992). 17 For a theoretical discussion on executive power and its comprehensive character, see Mansfield (1993). 18 s duration is by definition short term. In the long term, the stability of the political system will prevail and the rule of law will be above the rule of men. (Pearson, 2006). In times of crisis citizens tend to have more favorable perceptions of charism


51 leadership and its assessment is reduced to a judgment on the quality of decisions and choices. Without constraint, we are left without explanations of the ends, of the process of persuasion, ba rgaining and coalition building (Keohane, 2010). In this regard the incongruity between democracy and leadership is ameliorated. On one hand, democracies have other institutions that compete for power and public support and that guarantee popular governmen t and accountability; on the other, elections, government turnover and popular mobilization are also effective in restraining executive authoritarianism. 19 Furthermore, l democracy are also powerful constr aints. Throughout world history we know of leaders who have shown how personality matters, for instance in the U.S. we have contrasting examples. For example Franklin Delano Roosevelt pushed the limits of what a president could do at the same time that he chose to keep his own behavior constrained within the democratic boundaries (Burns, 1970), on the other hand, Dwight D. Eisenhower was careful in the forms and made it seem that he strictly observed his exercise of formal power, however he exercised leader ship with a hidden hand (Greenstein, 1982). The challenge for a democratic leader is to move his agenda forward while demands, and encouraging followers to carry out hi s decisions. A democratic president has prerogatives that may force others to follow, but he should not need to use force. A democratic president has the capacity to articulate convincingly what he envisions and to influence others, so that they see his go al as their own. For this the leader builds consensus, negotiates with congress and with other groups, mobilizes different groups and appeals to the public at large. 19 For a discussion of horizontal and vertical accountability mechanisms, see Anderson (2006).


52 The Study of Political Leadership Political leadership has often been framed in atomistic terms either by focusing on the individual or by focusing on the conditions in which leadership was exercised. 20 On one hand, political leadership scholarship focuses on character, including psychological profiling, leadership styles and political behavior. In this tradition, outcomes are a by product of larger social forces. 21 Examples of this type of view are the great man theory of leadership in the tradition of Carlyle and in works like personal conditions for leadership include the work of scholars who have provided a variety of psychological theories and classifications to understan d the quality of leadership, from personality traits (Hermann, 2003), to individual qualities (Dewan and Myatt, 2008; Levi, 2006; Keohane, 2005) to a combination of ingredients (Keohane, 2005). On the other, political studies consider the events and histor y in which leaders held their lead roles, considering leaders as subjects with marginal importance. Situational theory, for instance, posits that leadership depends on the situation in which actors find themselves. 22 For a long time the atomistic understand ing of leadership tended to oversimplify associated phenomena, such as charisma or effectiveness, and precluded systemic perspectives and accounts that acknowledge the interplay between structural and agent explanations of social phenomena. A call for inte rpretivist perspectives, offering the exploration of meaning, and intentionality derived into 20 For a complete review of political leadership theories, see Morell and Hartley (2006) 21 Consider biographical acc ounts of political leaders. 22 determinism and his famous words; Men make their own history but not in


53 constitutive theory, which acquired importance as it considered the role of interpretation in the symbiotic relationship between the leader and followers. For ins tance, scholars have analyzed how leaders use different leadership styles according to the constituency and the scenario. 23 In recent years, contingency theory has acquired importance, maintaining that leadership results from the synthesis of situational fa vorability and leadership traits and takes seriously the role of motivations and intentions. This dissertation draws from the comprehensive approach of contingency for the study of leadership. This approach posits that effective leadership entails the sync events and the choices of political elites could be decisive in shaping regime outcomes, not only in the short run but also in the long term, as leaders may change the course of history, but only if and to the degree that the environment permits (Levitsky and Way, 2006). By considering that leadership involves not only the leaders, but also th e followers, the relationships between them, and the nature of the context in which presidential action takes place, this dissertation provides a view to better understand the possibilities of change at a certain time. This study assumes that the course o f democratic politics in new democracies is shaped by purposeful political leaders. However, it does not assume that leaders have complete freedom to shape political outcomes, particularly in changing democratic contexts. Instead, this study takes as its b asic assumption that presidents are constrained in the extent to which they are able to act freely. Constraints arise from historic configurations in which they exercise their presidency, democratic institutions, 23 See Fenno (1978, 2003); Ing all (2001), and Mansbridge (2009).


54 ethical and moral considerations, and from their previous experiences in office. Although leaders add their own value to democracy through their fresh ideas and ability to seize opportunity, they are still expected to play their part in an institutionalized epends on personality, political skill, time, Presidential Leadership in Democracies In democracies with presidential systems, presidents have particular characteristics that distinguish them from other heads of state in non democracies. In a presidentialist system, a president by stature exercises the highest role in a country; he is the ultimate leader. 24 Since presidentialist s ystems are characterized by strong chief executives, who are elected separately from the legislature (with no direct legislative accountability except presidential impeachment, which requires a majority in the parliament) and who have their own base of pow er and legitimacy, presidents have traditionally been, and continue to be, the single most important individual actors in their political systems. Moreover, in most countries the president is the only democratically elected person in the system whose const ituency is the entire country. This provides him with popular legitimacy that exceeds that of any other elected official. This is the justification for arguing that the president represents the will of the people, as well as the reason why democracy develo ped mechanisms to constrain the leader. Anderson presidential system produces a strong and independent leader and societies demand 24 A basic definition of presidentialism states that the major characteristic of the presidential system is the separate election of the executive and the legislative for a fixed term, usually in a direct election.


55 rapid solutions to problems, there is a cl that would prevent power abuses. 25 The systematic study of presidential leadership has received more attention in established democracies than in any other political context. Furthermore, presidential studie s literature, in the tradition of American politics, has long looked at leadership as a decisive arena that challenges political structures in the margins of established democracies. As Stepan and Linz (2011) correctly point out, after World War II most o f the academic works in American politics happened in analytic isolation from external comparative democratization. Even those concerned with American political development with a mission to engage in comparative approaches, have produced little research t hat indeed compares the United States democracy with other democracies. While this lack is certainly problematic, as it impoverishes modern political science, this dissertation is an opportunity to test the wealth of theories, materials and specializations that exist in American politics and broaden our perspective on democratization. The same can be said about the input that democratization studies in other polities, such as the cases in this dissertation, can bring to American politics. 26 In American pres idential scholarly literature, the exercise of presidential leadership is problematized as the principal empirical puzzle of the sub discipline, whether understood as the exercise of power per se, the role of the presidency, the role 25 In th e scholarly discussion of the best system for democracy, there are those who see presidentialism as a threat to democracy and those who see it as an opportunity. This discussion is addressed in Chapter 2. For Jones the American system is more "separationis t" than presidentialist, in the sense that American political development has 26 up call for incorporating the United States into democr atization standing democracy among industrialized countries.


56 of a particular presid ent, or the executive (see Rockman, 1984; Cronin and Genovese, 2004). Since the beginning of the creation of the American political system, the executive, in particular presidential leadership within the executive, has been a subject of controversy. The f ounding fathers could not agree on the desirability of a powerful presidency or a powerful president, because they aimed for limited government and limited discretionary power of a single individual. As Mansfield (1993) contends, the new republicanism impo rted for the executive both the strength of monarchy and some of the techniques of tyranny. For Mansfield the incorporation of a strong presidency not only republicanized English monarchy, but it also constitutionalized the anti constitutional Machiavellia n prince, so that there is impulse to get results. Indeed, one has to regards to constitutional power sharing among government branches. He was expressing his doubts about the w orking of a new political system with an ambiguous Constitution, vague enough to allow one powerful person at the top of the system and to have a system of checks and balances untested. Moreover, on one hand the Federalists argued in favor of the special r ole of the president. Alexander Hamilton the constitution. Madison (Federalist # 51) thought that presidential power could be counterbalanced in practice by a powerful opposition in Congress. On the other hand, the Anti Federalists were hesitant to consider that the Constitution could constrain a


57 strong executive, which by nature tende d to monarchic type of rule, especially during crises. As the studies of the American government developed, scholars have not agreed on the constitutional and actual position of the executive with regards to the legislative branch. Despite having a libera l constitution that sought to construct institutions for proper administration, there has been no guarantee of the virtue required for the effect. 27 In practice, the American presidency has seen both a strong and a feeble executive that was able to remain a s such, depending on the circumstances, given the effective separation of powers that is a characteristic of the American system, as well as the particular presidents who have imprinted their own mark in U.S. history. American Presidential Studies There ar e several schools of thought in American Presidential studies. Although they emphasize different aspects, all provide explanations on how and why presidential leadership came to be important, why presidential leadership declines and rises, and the variabl es that affect and are affected by presidential leadership. Moreover, presidential studies offer interesting explanations for the analysis of American politics, since such studies heighten the importance of leadership, both as dependent and independent var iables in the explanation of political phenomena. For instance, we find presidential leadership mattering in topics as diverse as the structure of power and the distribution of the effects of presidential leadership in public policy. The classic work of Richard Neustadt's (1960; 1990), in which presidential leadership is conceived as persuasion, has provided researchers the principal 27 For an account on the effects of institutions on policy outcomes, see the edited volume of Weaver and Rockman (1993)


58 framework to study the executive. Among the processes and arrangements that have been typically studied in the institutiona l approach, there are numerous works in decision making processes, organization of executives, and the relationship between the executive and the legislature, judiciary, interest groups and the media. In Neustadt's words: 'powers' [formal authority] are n o guarantee of power; clerkship is no guarantee of leadership. The President of the United States has an extraordinary range of formal powers, of authority in statute law and in the Constitution. Here is testimony that despite his 'power' he does not obtai n results by giving orders -not, at any rate, merely by giving orders. He also has extraordinary status, ex officio, according to the customs of our government and politics. Here is testimony that despite his status he does not get action without argumen t. Presidential power is the power to persuade. Neustadt considers presidential leadership to be the capacity of chief executives to fulfill their tasks, exercise their powers, and utilize their organizational structures in the formulation, coordination, promotion and implementation of the president's agenda. leadership because the institutional tools provided through the exertion of formal authority, do not preclude t he use of tools of political power that can go well beyond strategically asserting and manipulating authority. In the same manner, but applied to other democracies, Elgie asserts: the degree of status and prestige that is afforded to the President is partly offset by the concomitantly high level of responsibility which is incumbent on the officeholder. The greater the legitimacy that Presidents enjoy, the greater the expectations th ey face and the greater the expectations they face, the greater the difficulty they will have in exercising leadership. 28 28 Elgie (1995:118)


59 Furthermore, as Mansfield (1993) argues, the essence of presidential power is ality enhances his informal strength, and as a result the president is usually much stronger than we think. Despite Neustadt's suggestive efforts to expose the differences that an individual president of unusual personality, skill and clarity of political purpose can make, many subsequent empirical studies have depicted the inadequate capacity for persuasion as ompelling explanations for presidential success in the legislative arena are congressional centered (Bond and Fleisher 1990; Jones 1997), in particular the partisan and ideological composition of Congress and the power, strength and institutional position of potential veto players (Edwards, 1989, 2000, 2003; Bond and Fleisher, 1990; Peterson, 1992). While scholars may disagree about the specific and precise impact of variables centered in Congress (see Mayhew, 1991; Howell, 2003), the centrality of the tool s of presidential persuasion, such as skill and approval ratings, are only considered as tangentially decisive. Much of the work of George Edwards has illustrated the helplessness of the president to manage his approval ratings (Edwards, 1983, 2007). Simi larly, the analysis of Stephen Skowronek (1993, 2000, 2008) has demonstrated that most presidents cannot create or determine the opportunities and contexts for leadership. Their chances of success are largely determined by their place specifically whether they are associated with a political order that is in ascendance or whether they are inextricably linked to one in decline. Yet, as Seymour Lipset (1978) has demonstrated, the period in which a new democratic regime starts to


60 function makes great opportunities available for political leadership to shape the disposition of politics and the emerging political institutions. Scholars have developed a number of tools and theories and have adopted three different approaches to understand the capacity for presidential leadership: 1) the institutional approach, 2) the agency approach, and 3) the structural approach. The institutional approach studies the impact of institutions on politics as the center of analysis. Institutions are considered p ersistent patterns for political outcomes. The early presidential studies focused on the legal aspect of the presidential roles. Presidential power was seen as a formal position of authority that derived from constitutional ambiguity. Moreover, the early s tudies discussed the president's place in government as well as the normative dimensions of the presidency. With the rise of the behavioral revolution in political science, the institutional approach changed its legalistic focus to one centered on politica l outcomes; the role of the president in the political system was no longer questioned. Subsequent analyses considered presidential leadership to the extent to which presidents could obtain or maintain the support of other political actors for presidential policies, all within the arrangements of a working system of checks and balances. The approach recognizes that, although institutional prerogatives have changed greatly over time, the main structure of presidential action has remained basically the same. The agency approach emphasizes the impact of individuals in politics. The orderings of relationships and preferences are the recurrent patterns that explain political outcomes. Presidential power is considered a function of personal politic s rather than of position, ideas, interests, goals and vision at the center of analysis. Presidential


61 leadership is the capacity of the individuals to influence the workings and beliefs of other political actors: On assuming office, the leader brings to the job a set o f emotions, cognitions and predispositions, which is different from that of his or her predecessor. The individuality of these clusters of personality traits means that each leader has the potential to affect the outcome of the policy process in a differen t way. There is the possibility that a change of leader will bring about a change in the nature of the governmental decision making process. It is partly for this reason that voters are sometimes motivated to place their trust in new leaders. There is the belief that a new leader may be better suited to cope with the prevailing leadership personality and the environment with which the leader is faced. 29 Among the variables considered in the sc holarly literature are personality and psychological traits, principles and convictions, and cognitive processes. The structural approach is concerned with historical development and time cycles emphasizing more systematic aspects of the presidency and it s relation to the broader political order. This approach is different from the previous types of studies on the presidency, which focused on the actions of individual presidents, and where the most analyzed variables in the scholarly literature are skills, decisions, strategies and tactics. The structural approach stresses the conditions under which leadership is exercised. Historical conditions and time cycles are the emergent patterns that explain political outcomes. Presidential power constitutes the leg itimacy attributed to the individual president, whose power is context dependent. This dissertation combines structural and agency approaches. Because I am interested in the role of democratic presidents in the politics of their countries, I consider that presidents are not successful because they are elected, but because they can advance their political projects. They take their mission to the public and fight to 29 Elgie (1995: 9).


62 accomplish their goals; they choose strategies to reach those goals in a way that will maximi ze the chances to reach them while at the same time they are able to align with 30 I consider a democratic president one who demonstrates his democratic conviction in his acts. He operates and respects th e rule of law and the constitutional and legal framework, namely Congress 31 A president who takes over the legislative and judicial powers, who applies the law to his own convenien ce, who slanders and spies on opposition, and who steps over freedom of speech and ignores crimes against human rights cannot be called democratic. It is not democratic a president who seeks reelection against the constitutional order in place. A democrati c president is one whose political survival depends on his legitimacy; he risks defeat in elections (if consecutive reelection is allowed) and retires from office at the end of a limited term (unless non consecutive reelection is allowed). The following tw o sections explain the two theoretical frameworks that guide this dissertation and that correspond to the structural approach and agency approach, I know that is concern ed about explanations of political change. It recognizes that presidential politics at a specific moment in time is, to a large extent, an extension of previous presidential politics. Skowronek places emphasis on the causal significance of ideas, or more p recisely, of actors that in practice articulate and vindicate new ideas about their own roles in the politics of their country. Unlike Howell (2003), who is 30 Anderson reminds us that leaders, besides being evaluated for their power management and their responses to crisis and toward problem solving are also assessed on the normative basis of their conduc t and vision or the lack 31 This does not necessarily mean that presidents have a deep normative commitment to democracy per se.


63 un ilateral action, Skowronek is interested in the dilemma of presidents to shape the politics of the existing political system, as well as the constraints derived from the forces they create. ve of personality was found useful, as she provides a typology of political personalities based on the relationship between needs, traits and perceptions. Her approach does not fall into traditional clinical personality type assessments that are often foun d in other move beyond rationality assumptions in decision making and consider emotional responses as a result of endogenous processes. The combination of the approaches of leadership allows comparisons to capture macro political trends, political events and micro political behavior in new democracies. Skowronek provides the tools to understand the larger historical context that helps trace de mocratization as a process within the rise and fall of political orders. With an understanding of the context, the political events are viewed as both constraints and opportunities for leaders during each of their two terms. Assuming that the general goal s and vision of the presidents do not actions as the results of his reactions to constraints and opportunities, information processes and motives. Skowronek's Approach to Presidential Leadership The Politics Presidents Make (1993) and later work stands out in presidential studies because he combines the structural approach with elements of the


64 agency approach emphasizing the former. He provides a framework to understand leadership in time, where the politics presidents make depends upon presidential impulse to secure a place in history and on the political impact of his efforts to do so. The context y for the exercise of power. Presidential leadership is not a free will or a matter of character or skill; presidential leadership is largely determined by the context. Context repeats itself, and a leader must understand each context and master each confi guration endlessly makes us appreciate human agency as a measure of each individual effort. Attention is s of ideology, interest, and authority in what that presidents can be separated by great spans of time and yet share the same context, having more in common with each other than with either their immediate predecessors or successors. Skowronek emphasizes the incremental development of institutional capacities and the particular position of an individual president within the sequential rise and 32 Sko wronek speaks directly toward a the idea that the only thing that makes a president great is his capacity to regenerate politics, to reconstruct a new political order. I waiting for the next Franklin Delano Roosevelt, because the contextual conditions are 32 be used as defined by Robert C. Lieberman (2002), who, building on the work of David Plotke (1996), maintains ideologica


65 rarely apt for a leader to change the order of things altogether (Skowronek 1995). For Skowronek a great president is not a hero, or o ne that inspires his fellow countrymen, or leadership pretensions and the capacity of delivering his assumptions that make a president good; a president is first as fascinat ing whether he is a leader or a clerk, 33 because the most important changes presidents make happen in secular time rather than in political time. Indeed, simple activities such as staffing the executive branch and specifying a political project for his admi nistration are in them formative acts that readjust the terms of national debate and the conditions of political action. The principal premise of this work is that each president comes to office with a disruptive force, which is a paradox of leadership; be ing at the same time order shattering (different from the predecessor), order affirming (seeking his own legitimation) and order creating (seeking his own place in history). For Skowronek, presidents justify the reasons they were elected. Because they need to distinguish themselves from the previous president, there is an impulse of rupture with the past. As they try to make their own s in office, they have an impulse to construct their own rule and to maintain their work as they verify their places in hist ory. Even though the nature of presidential action is always disruptive, it is also embedded in a political order, and it nevertheless seeks the reproduction of a political order by reestablishing legitimacy on action, by default, a transformative and preservative endeavor. Skowronek argues that, despite the individual preferences success is therefore dependent on his relation of affiliation or opposition to established 33 Skowronek does not see presidents as public opinion movers or as dutiful clerks who lead the bureaucracy.


66 political commitments, whether those commitments are resilient or vulnerable. When a president assumes power, he faces either a resilient or a vulnerable political order. If the order is resilient, his leadership ty pe will either reinforce it or undermine it, according to his established commitments of ideology and interests. However, if the order is vulnerable, his leadership type will reveal a desire to change the order or prevent it from changing, depending on whe ther his affiliations are driven by ideology or by a particular interest. In his analysis of American presidents, Skowronek describes the dominant political coalition at a given moment in "secular time," as well as where in the sequence of "political time the president exercises leadership. "Political time" for Skowronek refers to recurring cycles in American political history that exhibit particular patterns of politics. He finds four types of political orders throughout U.S. constitutional history: patr of the president that emerges from the interaction of the presidency with institutions (formal or informal). Secular changes are emergent patterns of institutional orderings, which in turn are embedded in recurrent patterns that exist in history. By asking whether a president is affiliated with or opposed to established commitments, and whether those commitments are resilient or vulnerable, Skowronek generates four basic types of political leadership found in American political history: reconstruction, articulation, disjunction and preemption, all of which follow a sequential institutional logic of political disruption. Table 2 1 shows the types of political leaders hip illustrated by some U.S. presidencies. The combination of political and secular time, expressed respectively in


67 the strength of the political order and the contingent dominant political coalition, results in four basic types of political leadership, al l of which represent the lifecycle of a political order. 1) reconstructive presidents (opposed to the existing contingent dominant political coalition in a time when the political order is vulnerable), begin a political order cycle characterized by new int erests and commitments. Reconstructive presidents are usually followed by. 2) Articulative presidents (affiliated with the existing contingent dominant political coalition, at a time when the political order is resilient). These presidents are challenged t o innovate from within an established political order. 3) Disjunctive presidents (affiliated with the existing contingent dominant political coalition at a time when the political order is vulnerable), struggle to assert interests and commitments that are cycle. After disjunctive presidents, the cycle is repeated with the return of reconstructive presidents, who seek to build a new political order. 4) Preemptive presidents (opposed to the existing contingent dominant political coalition when the political order is resilient), to completely discredit the order. Preemptive presidents do not follow a strict order in articulative president. (1993) qualifies his presiden cy as disjunctive; because Carter was a feebly affiliated the New Deal order, which was an order initiated by reconstructive president Franklin Delano Roosevelt. Al l other successive presidents after Roosevelt and up to Ronald


68 Reagan were affiliated specifically with the New Deal, with the exception of Dwight Eisenhower and Richard Nixon. These two presidents exercised their presidencies when the New Deal was resilie dominant political coalition. With its established commitments and a structured authority, and they questioned the existing model for development as well as the type of relation between the state and society provided by the tenets of the New Deal. Carter was the last of the presidents of the New Deal. By the time he arrived to office the tenets of the New Deal did not provide a solution to the problems of the day. By then society was looking for an alt started with an order shattering impulse to fix the inefficient, red taped and multilayered state apparatus. Carter took charge of the independent powers conferred to him and exercised them in his own right. His administration became the embodiment of technicalities, scientific management, and professional expertise. His order affirming impulse consisted not in changing altogether the state apparatus but on making it work under his watch. He exercised his power and justified his way of protecting, preserving and defending the existent emblematic values. The order creating impulse was his attempt to provide a new set of tools. Carter tried to create a new political arrangement that could stand the test of legitimacy within the other institutions of government as well as the nation at large. However, there were underlying currents with profound tensions tried to control, the more he achieved the precise opposite. Because Carter did not 2003:365), his credibility as a national leader was challenged. It was Reagan, who


69 started a new politi cal order. He provided a new discourse, which articulated the need for profound change. This discourse was based not on a particular alternative Reagan proposed, but on his denunciation of the tenets of the New Deal. Indeed, the guiding ideas and principle s of the New Deal no longer offered solutions to the changing polity. Reagan became a reconstructive president, by first repudiating the very tenets of the New Deal. Skowronek recognizes that the authority to repudiate is the most expansive and extensive of all political resources for the disruptive exercise of leadership, since it blends language and action, intention and effect, in the construction of political order. Without authority to repudiate a president finds it difficult to keep the political imp act of the exercise of power aligned which his own definition of the moment at hand. Having authority to repudiate can lend moral support to a coherent public discourse. Even though all presidents arrive in office promising change and denouncing the proble ms of previous administrations, only reconstructive presidents find themselves with sufficient authority to repudiate and start a new political order altogether. leadership per se For him, any president has the potential of presidential leadership, but the strength of such leadership depends more on the president's political authority than on institutional resources. Presidential leadership depends less on personal character than on the historically contingent ability to balance the order shattering, order affirming, and order creating impulses of presidential action. This conception of leadership is useful when comparing presidencies across time and across national boundaries. In th


70 comparing leaders across time because it provides the opportunity to test the idea that presidents are persistent agents of change embedded in particular contexts following historical cycles fo und everywhere. Interestingly, in his analysis and classification of presidents from John Adams to Bill Clinton, Swokronek classifies Grover Cleveland, the only president who served twice non consecutively in the history of the United States, as one of hi s three hard cases. Swokronek refuses to label him as either a reconstructive or a disjunctive president. Indeed, a two time president with a second term separated from the first by an intervening term is difficult to categorize, since, depending on the ti me, his presidency seems to be of one type and then another. Having presidents with non consecutive presidencies actually provides the rare opportunity to look at how the same person displays his leadership style in two different political moments, when hi s own affiliation is shaped with the passing of time. political coalition which has c umulatively appropriated the modes in which government operations function. These two concepts introduced by Skowronek are pivotal for my research, because they aid in the understanding of presidential leadership dynamics and permit comparisons across coun tries histories, across individual presidents, and political time illum inates historical patterns, and the non consecutiveness of the presidential terms illuminates patterns of political learning. These in turn help explain


71 confronting a political order, and the individual political learning of a president based on his previous experience, all of which informs the impact of an individual president in the democratic process of his country. 34 Since Latin American presidents are decisive acto rs, understanding their actions, the political moment, and presidents' own personal struggles to secure a place in history may shed light in understanding the development of democracy in Latin America. My research considers the problem of political timing and how presidents exercising different types of leadership in their first and second terms can hinder or strengthen democracy. The crucial question is not how well presidents actions fit the various leadership styles, but what the implications of leaders hip styles are for Latin American developing democracies. This topic is explored in chapter 3. contemporary research on the American presidency agrees that the imperfect functi oning of the system of checks and balances is an important factor in limiting 1989, 1993, 2003; Howell 2003, 2005; Jones 1997; Peterson 1992). In Latin America, presidentia l leadership is often regarded as located at the center of the political system model was conceived for the American presidency but because all large collectivities require l eadership to function, particularly those that are in the process of developing 34 American politics, and it is understood as the change in the structure of the institution of the presidency that arises from extra constitutional forces, but that makes resources routinely available to incumbents in the exercise of their powers. For Skowronek, political time happens within a single and continuous democratic regime. In this dissertation the author understands political time as the change in the political resources available to incumben ts at any point of a regime, within (or not) a continuous democratic regime.


72 their democracies after the third wave, the appropriateness of this model in studying new democracies could potentially serve to compare presidents across nations and historica l periods. a new challenge with different resources at hand than those of his predecessors or successors. By looking at the same politician at two moments in his political life this dimensional personality traits are addressed. Furthermore, while Skowronek abstains from making an assessment on what good leadership is, in this dissertation moral and ethical arguments are considered key to understand leadership. Every president comes to office with his own perception of the common good. In this dissertation particular atte 35 This dissertation relies on the typology of leaders developed by Margaret Hermann (2001, 2003) as an analytic tool to assess leadership styles. 36 Lea dership how they structure interactions and the norms, rules and principles they use to guide as implications for democracy, as presidents are more or less likely to respond to certain events, and 35 On the importance of moral and ethical arguments, see Anderson (2011), particularly Chapter 2. 36 To create this typology, Hermann profiled more than 122 world political leaders through analysis of speeches and media interviews. 36 whom the Presidents had long term personal contact, journalists specialized in the Pre sidency, and scholars. Other sources were speeches, videos, published books and articles, and press interviews and reports.


73 challenges and to opportunities to achieve their goals in similar ways throughout their tenures. A study on presidential politics entails learning about way they conducted politics, the decisions they made and the events and history in which they held their lead roles. Political psychology rests on the belief that political structures and actions are shaped and channeled by peo 2003). Post has argued that particular personality types tend to be associated with particular belief systems and particular leadership styles (Post 2003: 80). Thus, textually, is particularly useful when we compare non connotes a systematic pattern of functioning that is consistent over a range of behaviors personality affects political behavior is in part a function of the nature and flexibility of the political system (Greenstein, 1987). For this research, it implies that context matters for shaping personalities, and different type s of personality have implications for leadership. Personalities are particularly important when power is concentrated, when institutions are in crisis, or when there is great change (Byman and Pollack, 2001) Political outcomes can be better understood w psychology. 37 to ride the inevitable waves of change that come with the times. Likewise, when countries seek to make their societies more democratic, it greatly matters who the leader is. In debates about whether leaders are born to be leaders or if they rise to the 37


74 occasion, scholars have produced a number of classifications. 38 For this reason constructing a profile of the leader requires considering early influences such as family wants. Post (2003) argues that traditional elements of particular importance to political personality include: intelligence, knowledge, drives and affects, including anxiety, aggression, hostility, activity and passivity, shame and guilt, evaluation of reality, judgment, interpersonal relations, identity and ambivalence and ego defenses. According to Post, personality types understood through cognit ive factors, organizational preferences, and policy preferences are important for political functioning. He contends that the features of a leader with narcissistic personality are a grandiose sense of self importance, preoccupation with unlimited success, need of constant attention and admiration, exaggerated charm, and a sense of entitlement, among others (Post 2003, 83 87). The features of an obsessive compulsive personality in power are outstanding organizational ability, attention to detail, emphasis o n the rational process, and preoccupation with matters of rules and order (Post 2003, 88 93). Leaders differ in their degree of responsiveness to context and the goals that drive their actions. Hermann asserts those in leaders the images leaders have of themselves and their perceptions of where their behavior is validated. Hermann stresses that the differences between leaders result from three combinations of traits: a) responsiveness envir onments, as an indicator of the importance for a leader to exert control and influence over the environment, or his adaptability to situations and his response to demands; b) self other orientation, signaling how open a leader is to receive input from 38 For an account of leadership style ty pologies see Hermann (2001).


75 oth ers in the decision making process and from the political environment in general, and c) motivations for seeking leadership position, which relates to the relevance of the groups with whom he identifies. Categorizing leaders on these three combinations of traits facilitates placing them into a three by three cube denoting their general orientations to the political context. Hermann found seven valuable personality traits for assessing leadership styles. a) A leader is a Challenger or a Respecter of constra ints according to his 1) belief in his own capacity to control events and 2) need for power. b) A leader is Open or Closed to information depending on his 3) self confidence and 4) conceptual complexity. c) Finally, a leader is either Problem focused or Re lationship focused, depending on his 5) focus on task, 6) in group bias and/or 7) distrust of others. Table 2 2 summarizes the to constraints, his ways of dealing wit h information from the environment, and the type of motivation focus he is more likely to have. Presidents have a dominant leadership style, since personality traits are dimensions that make up typologies. They move across dimensions depending on situatio nal and contextual variables. Because the nature of decision changes and the nature of problem changes, leadership styles are linked to characteristics of the context. It is the degree that matters, not that leaders have personalities with absolute presenc e or absence of traits. responsiveness to political constraints in their environments is determined in part by the b elief he can control events. It is a view of the world and a self perception that a presid ent can influence what


76 happens. Leaders who score high in this trait are generally active in policy making and want to maintain control over decision making. They are therefore less likely to delegate authority for tasks they consider important for achievi ng their goals. They are also less likely to compromise and deal with others. They convey strength and confidence in their decisions. The need for power indicates a concern for establishing, maintaining or Hermann argues that leaders who score high in this trait are generally daring and charming and they prefer face to face interaction. They generally see people in terms of usefulness to his ends. When leaders score high in both traits, they are likely to take charge of any situation and test the limits of what is possible before taking action. To see how far they can go in negotiations, they push the rules they themselves set and change to their convenience or whenever their interests or goals change. When leaders score low in both t raits, they understand the importance to work within constraints in their leaders score moderate in both, they generally respect constraints, but they take charge under threats t o their leadership positions and under national crisis. They are consensus builders, and compromise achievers, and they tend to be reactive rather than take initiative. When the belief to control events is higher that their need for power, leaders are chal lengers. They do not hide well their intentions well, making their influence less effective. The opposite, higher in the need of power than in the belief of controlling events is indicative of leaders who do not like to show off their power and are more wi lling to delegate and put others in the spotlight.


77 The second combination of two traits suggests that the likelihood of presidents to be open or closed to contextual information depends on conceptual complexity the degree of self confidence. When it com es about conceptual complexity, Hermann states that leaders high in the conceptual complexity trait see more shades of gray instead of blacks and whites; and they receive more stimuli from the environment than more assertive leaders. They are less willing to trust their instincts and are highly attuned to contextual information. Their high conceptual complexity pushes them to search for information from a variety of perspectives. Situationally responsive leaders gather information through a large network th at alerts them of public opinion, and they are more responsive to the needs and wants of others. reality is certainly important, as it is a source of reference for decision making. Mintzberg (1990) assures that leaders wit h high conceptual complexity are typically better informed than everyone else. Leaders have formal and easy access to information, and they know how to obtain and use it. They are at the nerve center of the political world, not only of state administration matters, but of the political world in general. Although they may not know everything that goes on, they typically know more than subordinates and rivals. Leaders with low scores in contextual complexity perceive information from the environment more sele ctively, and they are less likely to change their attitudes and beliefs with ease. Leaders high in self confidence interpret and filter information based on their high sense of worth. They are more resistant to incoming information, and do not reach out to new material for self evaluation. These leaders believe they know what is right and what should happen and set about to persuade others of the appropriateness of their courses of action. Such leaders are fairly


78 unresponsive or insensitive to cues from the environment. Instead they reinterpret the environment to fit their view of the world. These leaders are likely to organize the decision making process in a hierarchical manner to maintain control over the nature of the decision. Leaders with low scores in self confidence are easily buffeted by the in order to know what to do and how to conform to the demands of the circumstances in which they find themselves. When leade rs score high in both traits, they are open to information and strategic in their behavior, focusing on what is feasible at any point in time. Their high confidence facilitates having patience. While they want to take action, they have the capability to ch eck the environment and see how it will work. They are the center of the information network; for them information is power. One problem that results from these traits is the appearance from the outside of erratic and opportunistic behavior. When they scor e low in both traits they are closed to information and they seem to reflect the views of those around them. Many of these leaders show narcissistic signs, and enjoy attention. When they are moderate in these traits their behavior will change according t o the are more open and pragmatic to the needs, ideas, and interests of others. In the opposite situation, when self confidence is higher than contextual complexity, l eaders tend to be close to contextual information. They seem to be ideologues and advocate strongly for causes. Hermann contends that leaders are driven in general either by an internal focus or by the quest for legitimacy by seeking appreciation by other s. In the former case, the


79 drives are usually ideas, images causes or particular problems. In the latter, the drive is to be accepted gain approval, get support, seek acclaim. Three traits provide evidence roblems vs. relationships, leaders care about problems but also care about the support of their leadership. In this regard problem driven presidents manage relationships with the main goal of solving problems, while relationship driven presidents are conce rned about the feelings and needs of their constituencies, emphasizing group maintenance, loyalty and support. Leaders who are expectations. The combination of in group bias and perception of the world. Leader with high in group bias put their own group (social, political, ethnic, etc) at the center of the world. Leaders are more identified with group attachments. Their decisions favor their group and the leader is generally interested in maintaining its separate difficulties. Leaders with low scores on thes e traits are less strongly tied to specific groups. Leaders with low group more fluid, and they reached out with others to enhance relationships. The seventh trait is distrust of others, is related to the feelings of doubt and suspicion of the motives and experience with people involved and on the nature of a current situation. Leaders with scores high in distru st are constantly vigilant and want to anticipate. They do things on motives in perspective. As Diamond (2010) argues when people feel threatened, they


80 tend to act emotio nally and are often unable to see things objectively as to effectively achieve their goals. Threats activate the emotional side of leaders instead of appealing to rationality, which in turn lead to failed negotiations. When leaders have low in group bias a nd distrust of others, they do not perceive the world as a threat but simply as a series of constraints. They focus on taking advantage of opportunities and relationships. When they score high in both scores, they confront problems as zero sum game. They t end to behave aggressively and to focus their attention on eliminating menaces and problems, seeing adversaries as constant group bias and low in distrust for others, they tend to focus on threats as problems an d to see that situations also offer opportunities. Leaders with the opposite scores are more flexible and focus on building relationships while remaining vigilant. When the three dimensions challenge or respect of constraints, openness to information and motives and focus are interrelated, eight leadership styles result as shown on Table 2 3: expansionist, evangelistic, actively independent, directive, motives mak e them tackle problems, develop ideas, establish goals and priorities in particular ways. Furthermore, they define policies by reinterpreting and redesigning situations guided by their goals and principles. The personality portraits of presidents are valu able if we are to understand not only historical actions and events, but also how personality predicts future behavior and policy choices given certain scenarios. In fact, when selecting candidates, voters are systematically exposed to candidate background s, because the formation of an image


81 of the person is important for voters. It is easy to think of leadership as a test of character. But while good intentions matter, so does the capacity to follow through on them. Exercising presidential power in practic e, as well as delivery and implementation of presidential agendas, is important for democracy, whether it is about state building, power sharing, 39 or strengthening existing institutions It is critical to count on the capacity of the leader, to make and im plement major strategic decisions. It is not unusual to have leaders with good ideas, but these ideas make little difference if the systems are not in place to move decisions to delivery. Without capacity, even the greatest visionaries find it hard to turn aspirations into actions. On the other hand, no effort carried out with deep conviction can be qualified as fruitless. Therefore, when analyzing the democratic behavior of a leader the process of turning a goal into a decision is as important as the decis ion itself. Discus sion This chapter discussed the various meanings of leadership and the difficulties in capturing its main characteristics. However, this dissertation considers as democratic presidents those leaders who are at the same time constrained b y historic configurations, democratic institutions, and ethical and moral considerations, as well as by their previous experience in office. 39 predicated on agency. Political inclusion entails the accession to the political sphere by those groups tradit ionally absent from it, and it can take on more or less intense forms. The indicators of agency suggested here are three, ranging from weakest to strongest. Individual agency involves the appearance in the political arena of persons from excluded categorie s of the population as candidates and representatives in their own right, and the demonstration of their agency is their successful election to local office. Collective agency is manifested through the creation of a political vehicle in which persons from marginalized categories together constitute a channel for influencing local politics directly. The third indicator is the nature of the demands and policies put forward by these new agents in the local sphere and the degree to which they reflect collective


82 After reviewing the many ways in which political leadership has been studied, this dissertation has adopted two th eoretical frameworks that complement each other in order to have a complete understanding of political change in new democracies. While one emphasizes structure and explains macro political trends to provide an account for political events, the other empha sizes agency and explains micro political behavior the concepts of political and secular time. These concepts help situate the three presidents studied in depth, in the history of their countries as well as in the life of understand leadership in psychological terms, as the result of personal responses to political constraints, as perceptions of context and as motivations.


83 Table 2 Strength of the political order Relation with the contingent authority Opposed Affiliated Vulnerable 1) Reconstructive presidency Thomas Jefferson Andrew Jackson, Abraham Lincoln, Franklin Roosevelt 3) Disjunctive presidency Quincy Adams, Franklin Pierce, Herbert Hoover, Jimmy Carter Resilient 4) Preemptive presidency Woodrow Wilson, Dwight Eisenhower, Richard Nixon, Bill Clinton 2) Articula tive presidency James Monroe, James Polk, Theodore Roosevelt, Lyndon Johnson


84 Table 2 Traits Rank Characteristic Challenger/respecter 1. Belief can control events High in 1 and 2 Chall enger Respecter Challenger/respecter according to situation 2. Need for power Low in 1 and 2 Moderate in 1 and 2 High in 1 and low in 2 Challenger, but too direct in the use of power Low in 1 and high in 2 Challenger, but their power is behind the scenes Openness information 3. Contextual complexity High in 3 and 4 Open 4. Self confidence Low in 3 and 4 Close Moderate in 3 and 4 Open/close according to situation High in 3 and low in 4 Open, pragmatic and responsive to others Low in 3 and high in 4 Close, unresponsive, insensitive, driven by own ideas Motives: Problems/relationships 5. Task focus High/low Focused on problems/relationship 6. In group bias High in 6 and 7 Focus on problems 7. Distrust of others Low in 6 and 7 Focus on relationships High in 6 and low in 7 Focus on problems Low in 6 and high in 7 Focus on relationships


85 Table 2 3 s Responsiveness to constraints Openness /closeness to information Motivation Problem f ocus Relationship focus Challenger Closed Expansionistic: Focus is on expanding Evangelistic: Focus is on persuading others Challenger Open Actively independent: Fo cus is on maintaining and flexibility while avoiding obstacles that limit both Charismatic/Directive: status and acceptance by others, seeking to enhance reputation Respecter Closed Incremental: Focus is on improving incrementally while avoiding obstacles Influential: Focus is on building cooperation in order to gain a leadership role Respecter Open Opportunistic: Focus is on assessing what is possible in the current situ ation given what one wants to achieve and what is permitted by the environment Collegial: Focus is on reconciling differences and building consensus, empowering others while gaining prestige for oneself, and sharing accountability


86 CHAPTER 3 PRESIDENTIA L POLITICS IN LATIN AMERICA This chapter examines the pertinence of existing theories of presidential leadership applied to Latin America It ar gu es that the institutional perspective, in particular classic presidentialism, needs to be revisited and move b eyond the emphasis on formal political institutions. T he focus should be instead on democratic governance, understood not onl y as political performance but also as the behavioral dispositions of actors. Given the focus of this dissertation, this chapter la ys the ground to understand ing the role of presidents in Latin America Scholars of presidential politics can benefit by incorporating theories and frameworks developed in the American context to understand presidential leadership and the use of presidenti al power in the region. Discussion of Presidentialism Linz (1990) initiated the discussion of the perils and benefits of presidentialism, advocating instead for parliamentarism. Early studies had a negative view of the political architecture of Latin Am erican countries, given the presidentialist system existent in all countries. 1 In scholarly discussions of the best system for democracy, there are those who saw presidentialism as a threat to democracy and those who saw it as an opportunity. The most comm 1992, 1994) argument that presidentialism has been detrimental to a stable democracy and that parliamentary systems were better in terms of promoting democratic consolidation for four reasons. 1) The 1 After its independence from Portugal, for a brief period of time (1822 1889), Brazil became a representative parliamentary constitutional monarchy under Pedro I and Pedro II. Mexico s tarted its independent life as a monarchy (1822 1824) but quickly became a presidentialist country. These two nations are the only ones that experienced a non presidentialist system.


87 the executive and legislative provides the executive with an independent mandate resulting more frequently than not in provocative plebiscitarian, populist and nationalistic pleads. Thus the president has more power and discretion than his executive counterparts in other systems, making the presidency prone to power abuses. 2) Presidentialism fosters zero sum competition, producing policy gridlock with the legislative branch. The lack of a direct link with Congress can lead to political stalemate when the party of the president lacks a majority in congress, and governing can be difficult since opposition parties in congress lack real incentives to cooperate. They do not benefit much from policy successes and could be blamed for policy failures. 2 3) Because presidents have fixed terms and the process of constitutional removal of a president tends to be difficult, the political system can be paralyzed for a long time when there is an incompetent president or on e who lacks popularity. There is a lack of accountability of the government because the president can be dismissed only through complicated impeachment procedures. 3 4) Because presidents are directly elected though a winner take all election system, often without a congressional majority, there is a disproportional sense of legitimacy, which often avoids coalition and consensus building, besides being a problem of representation 4 Counterarguments by those who hold that presidentialism also offers opportu nities for democratic advancement include rebuttals to each of these issues. 1) Presidential institutions satisfy democratic aspirations by producing executive and legislative institutions arising from elections. Presidentialism also has mechanisms of cont rol to prevent tyranny through power diffusion, and presidentialism can provide a 2 For the relationship between the executive and legislative in American Politics literature, see also Jones (1997) 3 See also Shugart and Carey ( 1992). 4 See also Lijphart (1992).


88 balance between direct popular sovereignty and representative government (Mettenheim, 1997). 2) The separation of powers and the tensions between the executive and legislativ e branches allow citizens to hold the administration accountable vis a vis congress. Partisan powers provide an opportunity for the president to use his power to rally party support in congress to move his agenda forward. 3) Fixed terms provide more stabil ity to governments than a parliamentary system. Moreover, most of the constitutions in presidential systems include impeachment and/or congressional interpretation of the capacity of the president to continue governing. Although impeachment is not a power of the president, but rather of the legislature to remove the president, it affects the relations between the executive and legislative branches and is used as a safeguard mechanism when the president is alleged to be guilty of serious charges, including v iolation of the constitution, crimes and abuse of authority. 5 4) Presidential mechanisms can foster inter branch cooperation by making informal legislative coalitions through mechanisms such as bargaining, cabinet appointments, policy trades, and pork barr el spending (Negretto, 2006). The Presidentialist Tradition in Latin American Studies Whether one prefers one system or the other, as time passed the negative scholarly assessments changed, 6 and the reality is that Latin American countries are very unlikel y to change their presidentialist systems. Not only is presidentialism part of their political traditions, but there is no clear empirical example of a country that moved 5 For instance, the Ecuadorian constitutions provide congress with impeachment authority when there are allegations of poor performance of duties. 6 In his review of the evolution of the debate on the merits of presidentialism and parliamentarism, Elgie (2005) considers that the third wave of presidentialism studies made clear that, while institutions matter, there is a number of other factors that affect how they matter, including the number of veto players, the ideological distance between them and the degree of cohesion within the main groups of players.


89 from presidentialism to parliamentarism, at least not in the region. 7 That is why it is important to understand where presidentialism emerged and why Latin America has not developed into liberal democracies, and consolidated as such, at earlier times, as did the United States. Starting in 1978 all Latin American countries, with the except ion of Cuba, began to return to democratic politics. The democratic experience of the region has seen advances and setbacks. Common arguments about the deficiencies of the democratic regimes in the region refer to persistent privilege, corruption, injustic e and inequality. The question about the choice of political system, along with its institutions and actors, is important in the contemporary social sciences, and it is even more important when considering democratic performance. But, above all, it is impo rtant for the millions of citizens who live in Latin America under a democratic regime and under leadership that helps to shape the future of democracy in the region (UNDP, 2005). Many institutional layers of political systems, such as presidentialism vs. parliamentarism, the electoral system, and federalism, have compelled scholars to look inside the components and outside formal institutions, and to assert that there is no optimal political system. 8 While there is little doubt about the importance of pres identialist institutions as such, the results for democratic politics have been mixed. Most of the scholarly literature has 7 Over time some countries have tried slight variation s from presidential governments. Peru h as the figure of the Prime Minister, albeit he acts as a chief of staff. Uruguay at some point had a collegiate presidency in the Swiss tradition. Mexico and Brazil experimented with monarchical models in the 19th century. Outside the region while there i s no general consensus on the list of countries which are presidential, semi presidential, or parliamentarian, there has been a tendency in recent years for some countries to move from presidentialism to approach at least a semi presidential status in orde r to achieve governability and stability. For instance Poland in the 1990s made its transition from presidentialism toward parliamentarism but the result has been characterized as semi presidential (Elgie, 2007), as a dual system (Easter, 1997) or as limit ed presidentialism (Derbyshire and Derbyshire, 1996). The same problems of classification pertain to Moldova, Romania, Croacia and Lithuania. For a discussion of countries classification and changes in their political systems, see Elgie (2007). 8 For an ac count of country studies on the components of the institutional arrangements in Latin America, see Carroll and Shugart (2007). The institutional layers argument was made after substantive scholarship. See for instance the edited volumes by Weaver and Rockm an (1993) and more recently Haggard and McCubbins (2001).


90 focused on the deficiency of democratic regimes in the region, finding institutions as important aspects in the understanding of dem ocratization. Nevertheless, attitudes of both the elite and the citizenry as well as the role of agency were found to be extremely important. 9 The rest of this chapter reviews the common explanations for deficiencies of democratic regimes in the region. F rom the institutionalist perspective, even though the experiences of Latin American countries after the immediate return to democratic politics have provided strong evidence of the negative assessments of presidentialism described above, the stable and dem ocratic U.S. presidentialist system remained an exception. Yet, all of the Latin American countries have presidential systems as the basis of their constitutional designs. When the countries became independent they adopted the presidentialist system. The n adopted the untested new model of government structure based on the experience of the American neighbor in the north. The hierarchical government structure of the Spanish colony made its way in the new nations, but the rhetoric helped to include notions of civil liberties and political rights (Montaner, 2009). Since then, none of the countries has engaged in a serious attempt to change the presidentialist system. Th e political leadership of presidential democracies has not proposed an altogether different system. Only the electoral rules have changed, but the basic structure of the formal institutions has remained basically the same. The U.S. experience, as well as t hat of several Latin American countries, undermines the argument that presidentialism is faulted per se There have been only 9 democratization. Karl (1986, 1995), in her analysis of democratization in Centr al America, emphasizes the role that elites have and shows how these pacts can undermine democratization efforts.


91 three democratic breakdowns in Latin America: Peru in 1992 and Haiti in 1991 and 2004, and research shows that presidentialist dem ocratic performance depends on how it interacts with other institutional arrangements. 10 Among the constitutional powers of Latin American presidents, decree making and agenda setting are often considered as excessively used by presidents. Yet, as Payne (2 007) warns, there is a difference between the power to issue decrees of regulatory and administrative nature and the power to legislate by decree. 11 Most presidents enjoy the former, but it is rare to find in Latin American constitutions presidents with unl imited decree making power. In practice, it is common for presidents to have the exclusive right to introduce budgetary laws, international treaty agreements, and trade tariff legislation, but for other areas, such as exclusive initiatives, special provisi ons are required. On the issue of inter branch conflict, scholars have found that the difficulty of forming coalitions is often related to poor incentives to keep a stable party discipline. The danger of having to govern under a minority government is det erminant for democratic consolidation. 12 Moreover legislatures that are made up of weak parties, as opposed to those made up of stable parties; tend to delegate powers to the president, suggesting that party system strength has a key role to play in democra tic stability. 13 Presidents in Latin America, in contrast to the congress driven initiative and enactment in the U.S., are the ones who initiate the budget bills. The degree of maneuver to change and increase the budget by congress is diverse, but the execu tive manages this 10 See Shugart and Carey (1992), Mainwaring, Shugart (1997) and, Weaver and Rockman (1993). 11 For a recent study on decree making and the use o f power in Argentina, see Anderson (2011). 12 See Cheibub (2007). 13 See Shugart and Carey (1992).


92 bill, given its importance in the workings of the government. Decree making usually involves power to make decrees in specific policy areas or in exceptional inte rpretation, because of the inherent ambiguity of the definition of emergency. On the issue of p residential politics encouraging personalistic leadership and presidential dominance over congress, leading to decisions that do not reflect the interests and de mands of the majority of citizens, Payne reminds us that, in such circumstances, there is also a greater probability that laws and policies will not be executed fairly and efficiently and that public funds will be mismanaged or directed toward private ends (Payne and Zavala, 2007). Further more, different electoral systems combined with presidentialism produce different outcomes in terms of political system effectiveness. 14 Practical experiences that question the presidentialism argument include a broad spec trum from countries like Chile, Costa Rica and Uruguay that have developed robust democracies under presidentialism to Venezuela and Guatemala with severe deficiencies in democratic practice under presidentialism. The argument about presidentialism being faulted per se can also be undermined when we look at the historical development of the system in the U.S. and in Latin America. While the formal institutions of the United States were deliberately designed to inhibit strong political action and to limit t he power of government due to distrust of state power, in Latin America more inclusive features were adopted and adapted to assure the effectiveness of decision making. While in the U.S., the individual states sought the least amount of intervention from t he federal government in local issues, in Latin 14 See Lijphart (1992), Payne (2007)


93 America the aim was the contrary. It was thought to be necessary to provide the reins of the state to the president, so he would make sure that the country could provide for its citizens, making the state ass Anderson, U.S. presidentialism was conceived for a context quite different from than in Latin America: The process of democratic development in the United States has been a negotiated movement fro m decentralized power, resting with the states, to more centralized power residing on the federal government. The opposite has happened in Latin America; the move was from the central administration toward decentralization/deconcentration. Anderson (2011:6 0). Having this in mind, it is not surprising that in the American political system the separation of powers works, as consensus and compromise are considered the essence of democracy. Even if power is concentrated in the president during a crisis, it las would become a permanent part of the polity, because he cannot sustain organized support as power is distributed between institutions. The system is flexible enough to assure long why scholars of the American presidency have affirmed that leadership in the U.S. is at the margins of the democratic system (Edwards 1989, 1993, 2000, 2003). This i s certainly not the case in Latin America, where there are new democracies, and leadership is not at the margins of the political system, but at the very core of it (Anderson 2005; Weyland 2004; Siavelis 2004; Munck 2004; Encarnacion 2000). As in the U.S. system, most Latin American constitutions legitimize, support and authorize


94 presidential leadership, 15 providing considerable leeway to the presidents in order to make decisions for reasons of unified decision making, activity, expediency and secrecy. Still he is bounded by the constitution; the most important appointments need congressional approval, and certain foreign and defense policy issues need congressional approval of two thirds of the chambers. However, despite the experience with authoritarianism, the democratic wave did not assure that the newly written constitutions would eliminate the possibility of autocratic leadership. The President is endowed with a large set of constitutional powers that allow democratic leadership, as well as the possibili ty of autocratic leadership. Like U.S. presidents, Latin American presidents can be agenda setters, and they usually lead policy making. They also have veto power, although the veto may still be overridden by two thirds of congress. Also similar to the US, the organization of the executive is entirely a decision of the president. Presidents are free to choose their advisers and to fill the posts where trust is essential for governmental functioning and fluid relations. Unlike the U.S. where the cabinet is n ot a decision making body, most Latin American presidents appoint a cabinet that acts as a unified team to promote, defend and implement the President's policy agenda. As with U.S. presidents, their Latin American colleagues appoint bureaucrats, but these prerogatives traditionally have been used as patronage, rewarding with posts as well as utilizing the appointments to guarantee the loyalty of certain groups. Although this practice is becoming less common as countries modernize with technocrats and civil servants, the practice is still widespread. 15 For a detailed description of presidential powers and a comparison in Latin American countries, see Payne (2007 chapter4 : 87 110)


95 Unlike the U.S., where the presidency is viewed in a wider context, the system of divided government is strong and political parties add coherence to political action, in Latin America the rest of the system is less coherent, less organized and less capable of achieving coordinated action across institutions. It has been argued that the reason lies not in the system of divided government itself, but in the weakness of party systems across the region (Mainwaring and Scully, 1995). Mainwaring and Scully (2010) have suggested that good governance under democracy seems to be more important than the structure of formal political institutions. Under this perspective, there is no need to worry about democratic breakdown because democracy in the region from the minimalist perspective of competitiveness is here to down phenomenon that refers to how well democratic government and the state in a de 16 Indeed, the authors argue that democratic setbacks are attributable in part to lack of effective government performance, having failed to promote growth, reduce poverty, ameliorate inequalities and address rampant crime. Another argument concerning the deficiencies of democratic regimes in the region refers to authoritarian culture. Huntington has pointed out the centrality of the identities of the actors and their culture in the shaping of institutions: would America be the America it is today if in the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries it had been settled not by the British Protestants but by the French, Spanish, or Portuguese Catholics? The answer is no. It would not be America; it would be Quebec, Mexico or Brazil. (Huntington, 2004: 59). 16 Mainwaring and Scully (2008) p. 113.


96 Indeed the development and maintenance of democracy are greatly facilitated by values and the behavioral dispositions of compromise, flexibility, tolerance, conciliation, moderation and restraint, especially at the elite level. In contrast, the absence or disappearance of accommodation norms and democratic values is clearly associated with democratic failures. The ability and behavior of political actors is therefore regarded as an essential condition for good governance (Diamond e t al., 2008). Before the turn of the millennium, tolerance for presidential authoritarianism was widespread, since Latin American voters cared mostly about economic development (Przeworski et al., 2000). However, regime performance in addressing citizen ne eds makes satisfaction with democracy to be a wavering issue, and it has opened the doors for antiestablishment populists whose commitment to democracy is blurry (Mainwaring and Hagopian, 2005). New research suggests that the beliefs in a strong hand have diminished, while support for democracy as a regime type have increased, suggesting that Latin Americans are learning to distinguish between democracy as a system and democratic government (Chu et al., 2008). Another set of explanations about deficiencies of democratic regimes in the region has been attributed to the lack of commitment of key political actors. Political will has been recalled to bring necessary democratic change and see political leaders as not fungible. 17 For instance in the recent history of Venezuela, it is unlikely to conceive a different path for Venezuela in the last twelve years without the controversial and consummate narcissist, [who] envisions himself as the savior of Venezuela; likely to do 17 Political culture and shared historical experience are often cited as determinant for development outcomes. For a recent defense on leadership over other factors, see Fukuyama (2008).


97 2007: 4). Th e slow deterioration of its economy was leading to financial turmoil, a corrupt and inefficient managerial class and consistent efforts to deliberately undermine I ndeed all over Latin America, presidents have played the role of both savior and endangerer in the history of their countries. Interestingly enough, the prevalent trend in studies on the region has been to cast them as menaces, whether they analyze leaders in individual biographies, testimonial accounts, or historical accounts. Very few studies have seized the opportunity to study presidential leadership in Latin American democratic contexts, despite all the attention that the region has received with regar ds to democracy, democratization, transitions and consolidation studies. 18 In fact, the initial optimism of the literature, after the transition from authoritarian regimes, has been obscured by theories positing the impossibility of certain Latin American c ountries to create and strengthen enduring democratic institutions. The non evanescent delegative t characteristic is the existence of a strong executive with delegative powers and no horizontal accountability: whoever wins the election for the presidency is entitled to govern as he or she sees fit, constrained only by the hard facts of existing power relations be the embodiment of the nation and the main custodian and defender of whole nation, his p court and legislatures, for instances are nuisances that come attached to the domestic and international advantages of being a democratically y in those 60). 18 For the contributio ns of Latin American studies to democratic politics, see Geddes (1999), Bunce (2000), and Shapiro (2002).


98 As stated previously, this and the institutional design literature in the tradition of 1997 ; Kenney, 2 004; Sondrol, 2005), have also expressed concerns about the likelihood of democratic consolidation in the region, since the presidential model only (1992) argue that the pr ospects of democratization were very limited due to several factors, including presidential systems that encourage populism, 19 and zero sum game competition, making coalition building precarious. Diamond argues that: In Latin America as a whole, both the d egree of delegativeness and its impact on democracy have varied. But its fundamental ills personalism, concentration of power, and weak, unresponsive political institutions have prominently contributed to the turbulence and poor quality of democracy an d to the consequent political cynicism, and apathy among In Latin American societies, presidents are elected based on their rhetoric, on and particular issues. However a common theme is that all presidential platforms intend to improve the social and economic conditions of their polities. 20 Given these stakes, at the practical level, it is not reasonable to deem presidents either as incons equential or simply perilous or, on the other hand, as being the great movers and shakers of society that some theorists posit. Quite the opposite, leadership should be viewed as constantly playing a constructive part in developing societies. The case stud ies in this dissertation will look at political leadership action as the purposeful acts of politicians who further 19 Populism is an ideological stance that does not fit what has been traditionally known as right or left. It is a way of being and acting in politics that emotionally aligns the immediate needs and the lack of citizen culture in benefit caudillos, which do not have a country project but mainly a project for themselves. 20 Blondel (1993) argues that for leaders in all societies the most important aspect appears to be a daily concern for the improvement of society, where long term developments are balanced with the recognition of current problems, and where technical and economic progress is associated with a major interest in the well being of citizens.


99 liberal democracy in their countries, whether consciously or not, and who behave in a democratic manner. In Latin American democracies, pres idents face the challenge to respond to the overwhelming demands of their people, dealing at the same time with weak institutions and skeptical citizens. In recent times, globalization and mass media (which tends to present images of better life) have incr have stressed the failures of weak democratic institutions. Furthermore, there is a common belief among Latin Americans that the region is rich in resources and that the state should somehow provide for its citiz ens. Therefore citizens expect leaders to act swiftly to deliver tangible improvements, even if this means disregarding democratic mechanisms and principles. Indeed, citizens have a distorted view of democracy, expecting it to be a mechanism for rapid and efficient solutions. They fail to understand that democracy is a system that offers, at best, effective solutions and it requires accommodation and negotiation that take time and unrelenting work. Moreover, the rise of inequality and corruption and the ero sion of meritocracy have affected the leadership image. In this context, democratic leaders need to address realistic promises in order to demands into reasonable on es and to combine a government response with a symbolic solution. Moreover, leaders must facilitate political participation in governance by empowering citizens and making them part of the solution. It is true that presidents have a formal authority that vests them with great potential power. However, leadership determines in large part how much power they will

PAGE 100

100 realize. Economic conditions play an important role, as they constrain or enable governments. However, evidence of the various directions and possi bilities that elected politicians have taken when conditions are similar preclude us from falling into reductionist views. In the same vein, the political system provides room for problems and opportunities given a similar set of rules, but good rules do n ot guarantee good institutions can be made to work well, while no set of rules will fully compensate for bad 21 Presidents can take advantage of the opportuniti es in the electoral cycle, as well as other contextual events such as popularity and electoral honeymoons, to channel popular support into policies and stances (Canes Wrone and de Marchi, 2002). These informal powers are not exclusive to Latin American cou ntries, and many authors have pointed out the importance of presidents knowing when to use formal and informal powers (Kernell, 1997). It has been suggested, that it is in crisis time when one can tell y, and demonstrate if he can exercise restraint or choose not to stay within the democratic limits. According to Anderson, not only in Latin America, but crisis everywhere usually results in greater concentration of presidential power (Anderson, 2011:61). Indeed, all Latin American countries with a Spanish colonial legacy have experienced authoritarianism. Thus, conventional presidential leadership has not been considered as an opportunity to advance democracy. Quite the contrary, the use of presidential p ower has been vilified, given the authoritarian tradition in the region. Moreover, the question of the use of presidential power speaks to all presidential democracies which, besides 21 Fukuyama (2008) p. 216.

PAGE 101

101 the U.S. have not experienced the consolidation of liberal democracy. Bes ides dealing with the desire to constrain strong power, the new presidentialist democracies also face the challenge of using a copied democratic institutional framework, which has been made to work in older democracies whose political development has been quite desire to constrain it is more pronounced in new democracies where the institutional s of strong presidents with authoritarian tendencies challenge new democracies, particularly in countries with an authoritarian heritage. Thus the importance of having democrats in leadership positions is pivotal for democratizing countries. The problems of the concentration of power in the hands of the president take a consider the emotional relationship between the president and the people detrimental for democracy w hen he becomes the embodiment of the state and uses his power to further personal goals, we can consider his emotional relationship as an enhancement for democracy, because the president can inspire to achieve a common goal. Furthermore, this dissertation concurs with the assumption that politicians seek the continuation and improvement of their political careers, 22 but the fact that there are leaders with sincere policy preferences that seek to enhance people's lives cannot be ruled out. 23 The idea of pure self centered behavior, particularly when it comes to 22 This dissertation concurs with Strm (1990) in considering that politicians are self interested rational maximizers who seek three different types of gain: vote seeking, office seeking, policies seeking, or a combination of th ese. 23 See for instance Fenno (1978), Ames (1987) and Skowronek (1993). The latter sustains that even though the nature of presidential action is disruptive and embedded in a political order, it nevertheless seeks the reproduction of a political order rees tablishing legitimacy on his own terms, making the action, by default, a transformative endeavor. Presidential action is at the same time order shattering and order affirming.

PAGE 102

102 politicians, is a common skeptical view which ultimately minimizes leaders and their decision making without recognizing the plethora of motivations that move them as human beings living in a society. A s Sen (2006) argues, individuals have various affiliations and commitments that make up their identity. Therefore, to think that politicians have a cynical one sided premise of political action makes fools out of people who enter the public arena moved by the desire of make people's lives better. There are few studies on Latin American democracy that focus on agency and its role after the transition from authoritarian regimes on the 1980s in furthering democratization at high levels of power. The transitio ns from authoritarian rule toward democracy have not been results of an inevitable development process, nor have they been chance consequences. Such transitions have been politically led and managed. Democracy studies in Latin America that acknowledge the role of actors simply tend to see presidents as too powerful. Despite accounts of executive authority in Latin America since the beginning of the Third Wave of democratization, Latin American politics has yet to develop anything approaching a sub disciplin e of leadership or executive studies. In the 1990s, owing to the growing bifurcation of political and economic policy studies, presidents in the region have received some scholarly attention with regard to their link to the implementation of economic polic ies. 24 When talking about democratic problems, factors such as the influence of social and economic factors have received most of the attention, leaving presidential action aside. 24 For instance see Llanos and Margheritis (1999, 2006), Grindle (2000), Burges s and Levitsky (2003) and Murillo et al. (2011).

PAGE 103

103 Recently, some literature in Latin American politics has begun to address pr esidential leadership. 25 Generally there is a lack of analysis of the role of presidents, the institutionalization of the presidency, and presidential power. There is a need for more research on how these key players lead their countries and what impact th ey have on democratization, more so in a comparative manner. This void stands in stark contrast to presidential studies in American politics, where presidents are seen as leaders who, as agents of change, operate in a pluralist environment helping the deve lopment of a consolidated democracy. This understanding of presidential leadership and presidential power is sorely needed to understand the challenging times that democratizing countries face. The time is ripe, and the region presents a surprisingly unexp lored ground to study presidential leadership and its relation to the political order, as well as the learning of democracy by the societies that presidents seek to govern. Table 3 1 summarizes the differences between the study of presidential leadership i n American Politics and Comparative Politics. Given the absence of strong democratic political institutions in most Latin American countries, it is surprising to know that scholarship has focused on the problems of the institutions and the choices of acto rs in making these institutions. But there has been little study of leaders as opportunities to deepen democracy and as part of the solution. When explaining the varied experiences with democracy in Latin America, Diamond argued: the style of political lea accommodative, consensual leadership style is more successful in developing and maintaining democracy than a militant, uncompromising, 25 Anderson (2011, 2006) in Argentina and Nicaragua; Levitsky (2008, 1999) in Argentina and Peru; McCoy (1999) in Venezuela; Sola (2008) in Brazil; Conaghan (2008) in Ecuador.

PAGE 104

104 from consensus to confrontation, from accommodation to polarization regimes. Diamond (1999: 33). Consider, for instance, the issue of charisma, which is the ability to convince people, thro ugh sheer force of personality, to do things which they could not be persuaded to do by rational argument. Charisma, for example, has been a focus of leadership studies since Weber, but has not been studied in the region as an opportunity. 26 In and of itse lf, charisma is neither good nor bad. Most leaders are not charismatic, but the rare leaders who are can have extraordinary positive influence, wishes (Willner, 1984:8). Narcissistic leaders in particular often display remarkable degrees of charisma, and they can often take their organizations to great successes or equally great failures (Maccoby, 2003). The capability and integrity of leaders can either endanger or enhan ce the success of their policies and the social fabric of trust and hopeful expectations. This is important for several reasons. Voters want to be informed about their choices for hat most as economists understand the importance of expectations in the behav ior of economic agents, political scientists can also benefit from incorporating the role of expectations when understanding the exercise of authority. American countries state that presidents be limited to only one consecutive re election, 26 See Weber (1965).

PAGE 105

105 with the notable exceptions of Mexico and Chile. But constitutional and electoral reforms have provided presidential power to be extended by allowing immediate re election. There are many rea sons why incumbent presidents are inclined to cling to power. Unfortunately, the practical experience in the region has seen many of these cases. Some of this inclination can be attributed to clientelism and to fear of the unknown after the presidency. 27 Ma ny leaders fear prosecution after their mandates and they would better do anything to remain in power, even if they are not the official figures. Furthermore as political parties have weakened and fragmented, in many Latin American democracies presidential relatives benefit, partially, from name recognition at the polls and from the power of incumbency. As a result, many presidents have groomed wives, children and relatives to take over from them. For example Violeta Chamorro (1995) attempted unsuccessfully to change the constitutional ban of relatives to allow her son in law Antonio Lacayo to run for election in Nicaragua; Nestor Krishner (2007) successfully handed the presidency to his wife Cristina in Argentina; Alvaro Colom (2011) expediently divorced hi s wife Sandra Torres in an attempt to make her eligible to run for the presidency in Guatemala; Daniel Ortega (2011) was about to launch the candidacy of his wife if he was not granted the possibility to run for reelection in 2012 in Nicaragua; the daughte r of Alberto Fujimori (2011) ran unsuccessfully for the Peruvian Presidency, making it to the run off. Moreover, as the constitutional limit on the term of office approached, 28 a number of leaders launched political campaigns to 27 In some c ountries, presidents are required to declare their assets when they assume office but not when they leave. When they do (if at all) they tend to be ambiguous about the increase of their fortunes. (Anderson 2010) 28 Most Latin American Constitutions before t he reforms allowed non immediate re election; Colombia (1991) changed from non immediate to prohibited, Paraguay (1992) from immediate to prohibited, Dominican Republic (1994), Nicaragua (1995) and Peru (2000) changed from immediate to non immediate, and E cuador (1996) changed from prohibited to non immediate,.

PAGE 106

106 their parties: Alberto Fujimori (Peru 1993), Menem (Argentina 1994), Fernando Henrique Cardoso (Brazil 1998), Hugo Chavez (Venezuela 1998 and 2009 elimination of term limits), Alvaro Uribe (Colo mbia 2004), Rafael Correa (Ecuador 2008), Evo Morales (Bolivia 2009), and Leonel Fernndez (Dominican Republic 2010). After changing the constitution to be able to run for reelection Hiplito Meja (2002) had to concede defeat and leave office when he lost the 2004 election in the Dominican Republic. In Brazil and Argentina, term limits were set only after Cardoso and Menem were re elected. Alvaro Uribe, who successfully pushed for a constitutional change for a first re election (2004), could not repeat the exploit for a third term (2009) despite his attempts. The same thing happened to Menem in Argentina, who contended that his first term did not count under the new or reformed constitution, but in the end he did not pursue another extension of his mandate. Daniel Ortega (Nicaragua 2010) was able to secure a place in the 2012 presidential ballot after a Supreme Court reinterpretation of the electoral laws. In several other countries, including Guatemala, Ecuador, and Panama, attempts to lift the prohibition on immediate reelection were unsuccessful. According to Payne and Allamand (2007), comeback presidents undermine the development of a more pluralistic and institutionalized mode of exercising political authority. Despite good intentions, the attempt to be reelected, even with a lapse of at least one presidential term, show a tendency inherent in presidentialism toward individualistic leadership. Discus sion This chapter has revisited the common negative views of presidentialism and presidential power applie d to Latin America, arguing that assessments on the role of

PAGE 107

107 presidents from the institutional perspective have limitations. It also argued that assessments from the political performance perspective that look at policies to solve specific issues only provi de partial answers. The chapter advocates for an integral view of the role of presidents, as has been developed for the study of American presidents, but has not been applied in Latin America. This view considers that political leaders are not fungible. I argue that, while it is true that a first look at Latin American presidents can show the detrimental role of presidents in providing stability and predictability, by not conceiving presidential leadership as an opportunity to enhance de mocratization the regional scholarship has overlooked presidents as possible positive indeed instances of political disruption, not all instances of political disrupti on constitute instances of presidential action. Disruption is a broader term that takes a variety of forms and shapes, from small, incremental, and incidental to large scale, discontinuous and transformative. The chapter does not suggest that in a democrat izing context a strong leader is needed as opposed to institutions; nor does it imply that leadership is a shortcut to deepening democratization. I argue that presidents do not have complete freedom to shape political change. In democratic contexts they ar e constrained by the interplay of institutional, historical and social forces, as well as by their own personal limitations. The behavioral dispositions of actors are key in the analysis of leadership, for instance the issue of reelection and the attempts to remain in power certainly demonstrate lack of democratic conviction.

PAGE 108

108 Table 3 1. Presidential leadership in American Politics and Comparative Politics American Politics Comparative Politics Latin America Within system Across systems Presidentia lism and the system of checks and balances Various types of presidentialism characterized by both eclipsing figure of the president and sporadic significant legislative action Derives from their constitutional design Derived from the changing constituti onal designs as well as informal political practices. Within a political regime. Contentious matter over regime principles: executive energy vs. Legislative dominance Persistent conflict in terms of political regime. Succession of democratic regimes, sem i democratic regimes and authoritarian regimes Presidential leadership was grounded in behavioral persuasion Presidential leadership grounded in; a) rhetorical style since democratic institutions are see n as far from being consolidated b) constitutional design with focus on policy outcomes and informal political practices During the progressive era separation of powers seen as an arrangement designed to thwart democracy. Energy in the executive viewed a s something independent of constitutional form and structure Energy in the executive seen as detrimental because it exacerbates populist claims. Multi layered authority model, characterized by executive/congressional competition. Infrequent social unrest Executive centered authority model, in which the executive style of ruling is characterized by the need to control congress, and have access to security agencies that can help control social unrest.

PAGE 109

109 CHAPTER 4 GONZALO SNCHEZ DE L E AND DISJUNCTIVE PRESIDENCIES Until 2001, Bolivia was considered one of the greatest success stories in the Andes of the past generation in the remaking of political institutions (Whitehead 2001). In prior years, Bolivia was a showcase of stability and c oalition building (Mayorga 1997), and was even regarded as a consolidated polyarchy (Centellas 1999). By 2003, a democratically elected President, Gonzalo Snchez de Lozada, with previous experience in office, was ousted and the existing political arrangem ents collapsed. What could have gone so wrong? An easy answer would be to look at the previous two years to determine the events or political actors that made the political system collapse. However, a broader view finds the explanation in the lives of poli tical cycles, in what Skowronek calls political and secular times. The lengths of the cycles and the intensities of the changes between cycles are given by historical turning points, as well as by political leaders. This chapter reviews the emergent struc tures of democratization in Bolivia from the return to democratic politics in 1982 until 2003 to give a backdrop for Gonzalo consecutive presidencies, SDL I and SDL II. The presidencies are located in the life cycles of th e popular nationalistic order and neoliberal political order. Table 4 1 summarizes the classification of the presidencies in Bolivia during the two political orders and classifies each type of presidency according to its relation with secular and politica order, and through his leadership he contributed to deepen changes within this order.

PAGE 110

110 articulative presidency and his second term was disjunctive Sn chez de Lozadas presidencies receive these categorizations because in his first presidency he was affiliated with the existing powerful coalition of interests, and he sought to improve upon actions of the previous two administrations, rather than rejectin g them entirely. I assigned his second presidency to the disjunctive category because in his second term SDL faced criticism of his own first term and the political order became vulnerable. 1 He sought to legitimize his own political priorities in his seco nd term. disruption of the status quo ante and every president that assumes office has a built in impulse of order shattering Because each president comes to power with his own lead ership project, presidential action is formative, as it carries with it an order creating impulse, and since it seeks its reproduction, actions are also order affirming (Skowronek 1993). In this logic, each president leaves a unique imprint on the dynamics of the political order, since he exercises authority in both political and secular time. When history that was reconfigured by his predecessor, the impact of the pol itical order in place is marked by the degrees of alteration in the democratization patterns. The contexts of presidential power are anchored in political time, which corresponds to recurrent slow changes over time. 2 Presidential power is also anchored in secular time, 1 My understanding of political order includes a set of assumptions, common goals and concepts that form a core orientation of societies. A political order usually provides a set of standards for in tra elite debate over specific and equilibrium in politics. Institutions integrate the actions of the polity, coordinate its interests, and make it cohere as an organized system. Institutions constrain or channel the actions of self interested individuals by prescribing actions, constructing motives, and asserting legitimacy (Skowronek 1995: 92 94). 2 This is what Pierson (2003) identifies as a macro social process.

PAGE 111

111 corresponding to the contingent authority of the president that emerges from his interaction with formal and informal institutions. This makes him dependent on the existing space for maneuver, given his affiliation with or rejection of a coal ition of interests. As Skowronek reminds us, the most common changes derived from a incremental changes can have long term consequences. Popular Nationalistic Politi cal Order The Bolivian revolution of 1952 was one of the 20 th social and political transformations in Latin America (Skocpol, 1979; Huntington, 1968). The revolution, which marked the start of the popular nationalistic order, brough t an end to oligarchic rule characterized by the control of political, economic and social power by the tin barons. A succession of civil and military governments used the state to maintain the privileges of the white Spanish speaking elite. 3 Although the revolutionary process took years to mature, the catalyst was the unrecognized electoral victory in 1951 of the Revolutionary Nationalistic Movement (MNR Movimiento Nacionalista Revolucionario) by the military. 4 The following year, the MNR led a revolution joining forces with miners, (1952 1956; 1960 1964) and Herman Siles (1956 1960), sweeping changes to the relationship between state and society were implemented in an effort to modernize and build the nation state. These included: the incorporation of women and the indigenous majority as full citizens with political rights, redistribution of land, nationalization of 3 At the time, voters needed to qualify in order to exercise their rights. They needed a certain income and the ability to read and write in Spanish. Most of the population was disenfranchised with women and indigenous peoples unabl e to participate in politics. 4 The MNR was founded in 1941 and was active in politics, being an ally of the military government of Gualberto Villarroel in 1945.

PAGE 112

112 mines, free and mandatory Spanish speaking education, and pol itical participation by quotas of Marxist oriented unions and peasant organizations. The state expanded rapidly and drastically and became the most important economic agent. It planned and regulated the economy, produced the main sources of revenue, and es tablished development priorities. 5 With little democratic experience, political groups yearned to capture the state to pursue their interests. From 1964 to 1982, Bolivia went through several periods of military rule with episodes of civilian governments. T he different administrations governed the country through heavy state interventionism that involved degrees of socialist romanticism to massive state ownership. The transition from authoritarian rule started in 1978, but almost four years elapsed before an elected civilian assumed the presidency. 6 General Hugo Banzer Suarez (1971 1978) started a controlled transition to democratic politics, but the transition process became a muddle of disputed elections, with weak and fragmented political parties unable to reach consensus. 7 The military regained control, first with the military coup of Luis Garca Meza, followed by liberalized authoritarianism. 8 times, with increasing repressi on, corruption, association with cocaine trafficking mafias, and excessive borrowing. 9 By 1982 the military regimes were discredited due to poor economic management, the accumulation of foreign debt, repression of human rights, the rise of cocaine trade, an d isolation from the international community. These 5 These changes were made with almost complete ignorance of state organization (Whitehead 2010 ) 6 For a detailed account of the failed transition of 1977 1982, see Whitehead (1986). 7 There were three presidential elections between 1978 and 1980, called by Hugo Banzer (military) in 1978, Juan Pereda (military) in 1979, and Lidia Gueiler (civilian) in 1980. 8 dictablandas ) tolerates liberalization without being accountable to the citizenry. 9 Military forces assassinated civilian opposition political figures, closed Congress, took over the Judiciary and established a governmental system based on terrorizing and killing civilians.

PAGE 113

113 problems led to the recognition of the 1980 electoral results and the final transition to civilian rule in 1982. 10 The Hernn Siles Disjuctive Presidency (1982 1985) After a pact between military leaders and influential politicians, the restoration of Constitutional procedures was agreed. On October of 1982, Hernn Siles became the first democratically and constitutionally elected president after eighteen years of military rule. 11 His rise to power marked the beginning of the third wave of democratization in Bolivia. 12 The transition was at best a fairly unplanned and disorderly affair, or even worse, it happened due to lack of a better option. 13 Like that of Herbert Hoover, 14 to a national economic catastrophe, which, despite his efforts to counter the effects of hyperinflation, the Bolivian people hold as his legacy. The images of unrest, disorder, scarcity, long queues to access basic goods, combined with the image of Siles as incompetent, aloof was already on the verge of collapse. He was a political innovator, who advocated for fiscal responsibility and remained active, methodologically testing a range of different 10 Powerful economic groups that supported the military in the failed transition eventually handed the presidency to Hernn Siles, who won the 1980 el 11 By 1979 Siles had resigned from the MNR and formed his own party, MNRI. In the 1980 elections Siles led the Popular Democratic Unity (UDP Unidad Democr tica Popular), an alliance between the MNRI and MIR. 12 Bolivia made its transition a few years later than other Andean countries, but it transitioned before any of the countries in the southern cone. Argentina, with its dictatorial authorities, was afraid of a contagion effect that a civil administration in Bolivia could have in its politics (Whitehead, 1986). 13 Political leaders of the divided left supported Siles as an acceptable solution, not out of democratic conviction, but only to preclude the political right appropriating the mantle of democracy for itself (Whitehead, 1980). The experience of failure of the transition from authoritarian rule in 1977 1980 taught democratic leaders to make greater efforts for adaptation and to construct more ambitious broad visioned arrangements to safe guard political freedom (Whitehead, 1980). 14 See Skowronek (1993).

PAGE 114

114 responses. Furthermore, he tried to bring parties in Congress together to develop a solution, but the opposition acted negligently and left him alon e. disjunctive presidency He was affiliated with a vulnerable political order already in decomposition during the military regimes, and he was furthered exacerbated by permanent social protests. Siles was. When he returned to politics after the democratic transition, his ideas and style of politics were still under the sway of populist based state capitalism. 15 He believ ed that government had a role to play in controlling the dismal cycles of boom and bust. Since hopes were high, and social actors of all ideologies and productive sectors d emanded participation in Siles administration. At worst, they presented impossible demands. that the events of his day called to question. He became the foil of a resurgent opposition that, after so many years of dictatorship, was willing to test its influence. When he suspended payments of foreign debt until refinancing arrangements could be made, he was repudiated by the vulnerable establishment of the political order in pl ace. The long period of military dictatorship left acute problems for the new government: a disastrous economy with high inflation, an enormous foreign debt, and growing production of coca. 16 T he Siles administration was a disaster in terms of efficiency at the political, social and economic levels. If he encountered serious governability difficulties due to political and social pressure from the very start, at the 15 See Malloy (1991). 16

PAGE 115

115 As sh own in Table 4 2, GDP growth was negative during his administration, with an average of 2.48 % and inflation rose exponentially with an average rate of 3,357 % As shown in Table 4 3, there was even higher negative growth C onsidering GDP per capita with an average of 4.55 % Moreover, Siles displayed poor conflict management skills 17 with a Congress that challenged him constantly. 18 own leadership project, as revealed in his order shattering impulse, was short lived. O n one hand, Siles believed leftists could contribute to his administration with their participation, since he was an advocate of grassroots input to create a state run decentralized economic democracy. On the other hand, Siles tried to maintain control of his administ ration with cabinets that included independent technocrats, who were at odds with leftist ideas. S part of his austerity program were resisted by labor unions, which opposed economic stabili Central Obrera Boliviana), insisted on co governing with Siles, as they did during the MNR administration (1952 196 4), demanding pay raises, welfare policies and more benefits, at a time when the state was in default. When Siles refused, t hey engaged in broad mobilizations, strikes, and blockades. 19 Siles and his UDP party assumed governmental functions with no strategi c plan on how to confront the crisis. The solutions they proposed were 17 president, Jaime Paz Zamora from the MIR, turned his back on him Leadership disagreements manifested in changes in key leadership posts and policies; some ministers did not last even for a day. 18 Siles was asked by Congress to step down in 1983. In 1984, he survived conspiracies to remove him from office, two coup att empts, and was the victim of twice the level of horizontal and vertical challenges than Paz Estenssoro (Leivstrendet, 2009). 19 As Siles became increasingly besieged by protest, the coalition he led split into factions as disagreements over the handling of social protest and power distribution intensified.

PAGE 116

116 patchwork instead of substantive, and they were formalist and contrived in nature (Bedregal 1999). order affirming impulse led him to maintain his position as he tried to assert his authority even with angry labor unions and a hostile Congress, despite having a plurality of seats in Congress, as shown in Table 4 4. 20 For Siles, t he economic failure of his government did not arise from his own political inability and lack of trust i n his administration, but from faulted economic recipes that could not stop the spiral of hyperinflation. 21 After unsuccessful attempts to stabilize the economy, including the policy to de dollarize the economy, Siles was pressed to step down in the wake o f a general strike and one of the highest 22 order creating impulse emerged from his own downfall. By deciding to shorten his term and to call for new elections in 1985, Siles p recluded the country from experiencing a power vacuum and the return to the instability and trauma of the past 23 Even in times of the worst chaos, Siles refused to adopt extra Constitutional measures or to call the military back. With this behavior he cont ributed to preserving democracy, regardless of the personal cost to himself. He kept his inaugural those who do not believe in democracy and have interrupted it many tim es, depriving 20 Union Democr tica Popular) had a plurality of seats, but its capacity to pass legislation was strongly resisted by the alliance between opposition part ies: MNRH led by Victor Paz Estenssoro and its allies, the Christian Democracy Party (PDC Partido Demcrata Cristiano) and the Marxist Leninist Bolivian Communist Party (PCB ML Partido Comunista Boliviano Marxista Leninista), as well as; and Hugo Banze Accin Democrtica Nacionalista). Furthermore, after only three months in office, the MIR was excluded from the coalition taking along six ministries. 21 By 1984 there was still no successful market oriented strategy that could serve as referent in the region. 22 Inflation soared to an annual rate of 23,500%, Torrico (2006). 23 The negotiated scheduled date for the next presidential and Congressional term was mid 1986, but in the midst of rising hyperinflation and the destab ilizing forces pressing constantly, Siles cut short his administration by a year.

PAGE 117

117 people of their liberties, should reflect and understand that their time has come to end." 24 As Whitehead (1986) reminds us, the social meaning of democracy, despite its appeals and the obstacles, depends on the effective subordination of the military to during his weak administration the military remained in the barracks. 25 Other less moderate sectors of the military tolerated the lack of order during the S iles administration and the strong influence of the communists in the administration (Gamarra and Malloy, 1995). If there is something that the Bolivian politicians learned, both from the failed transition of 1977 1980 and the governability problems of th e Siles administration, it was to value stability and predictability and to make greater efforts for adaptation to safeguard political freedom (Whitehead, 1980). 26 to the unfortunate situation of other late political order affiliates, his accomplishments became more transcendental. The most remarkable result of the national calamity that going. As did Hoover during the Great Depression, Siles took charge of a political order that was breaking up after decades of frustrated attempts to make it work. He trusted technocrats to implement austerity policies at the same time that he endured extreme political pressures while preserving democracy 24 Presencia, 11 Octubre, 1982. 25 Three coup attempts against Siles by dissident officers in April and December 1984 and in January 1985 were thwarted because the military, i ncreasingly commanded by younger, more professional officers, remained loyal to the government. In the April 1984 failed coup, Siles was abducted for a few hours by drug dealers, but even the military spoke out against this action. The ex dictator General Hugo Banzer with some military sectors transformed its force into ADN, a political party, which participated in the 1980 elections and became the third most voted political party, behind UDP and MNR, as shown in Table 4 4. 26 As Coopedge (1998) noted, party polarization that torn the Siles administration apart taught political moderation. However, after a few years, polarization outside the party system emerged. Moreover, new populist parties emerged in 1989 with a discourse at odds with the establishment.

PAGE 118

118 control over the political definition of his actions preceded the total collapse of the economy. However, he was able to continue largely on a personal course, and in the end to redirect government in a new directio n from which it would not depart even after he himself had been painstakingly repudiated. During his administration, civil society reorganized, not only by strengthening its independence from political parties, but also by increasing in complexity and hete rogeneity (Crabtree, 2005). As a result, society became an important political player that added to representation in Bolivia under democratic politics. Neoliberal Political Order From 1985 to 2003, stability and governance in Bolivian politics rested in t he political elites of three political partie s : Revolutionary Nationalist Movement (MNR Movimiento Nacionalista Revolucionario), Leftist Revolutionary Movement (MIR Movimiento de Izquierda Revolucionario), and Democratic Nationalist Action (ADN Accin De mocrtica Nacionalista). These parties established coalitions with minor parties (Gamarra and Malloy, 1995; Mayorga 1997; Birnir, 2004) and alternated power. The three political parties held similar stances with regards to the economic orientation of the c ountry, considering liberal democracy and neoliberalism the adequate path for commitment to free markets, governability based on political coalitions and a reduced state. As shown in Table 4 5, the three parties made up 73 % in the general elections of 1985 and 1989, 57 % in 1993 and 1997, and 42 % in 2002. The electoral system reform of 1992, with its post electoral coalition making process, produced par liamentarized

PAGE 119

119 presidentialism. 27 After a painful and traumatic structural adjustment, the political and economic agents were able to stop operating in survival mode. Although they differed in details, the three major political parties were committed to eco nomic growth with market oriented policies that would pull Bolivia out of poverty, political stability based on democratic representation, and a legitimate state that intervened efficiently between society and the markets. Once macroeconomic stability was achieved, it became one of the most precious values by major players, who saw it as worth preserving, thus reducing the possibility of radical changes in economic policy. This broad agreement allowed political parties to compromise and cooperate, thereby p reempting major political conflict. As shown in Tables 4 2 and 4 3, higher rates of economic growth were achieved with a 3.10 % increase in GDP between 1985. oriented policies. As shown in Table 4 3, GDP per capita during those years grew only 0.88 % often perceived as leading to greater disparities in incomes (Graham, 1997). To a large extent, inequality in Bolivia had been the result of state capture by predatory elites. I f coalition building allowed stability and the passing of legislation, it also led to sharing of the spoils of electoral victory. The three parties that formed short term patronage based alliances with smaller parties treated state offices as possessions, and public service as such seemed to be largely forgotten. Those in the coalition dominated national politics, and although they created mechanisms to expand 27 Parliamentarized presidentialism is a variation of presidentialism in which the president is elected in a second round by parliament. Since none of the candidates reach the minimum threshold to be directly elected in the first round, the president is elec ted by parliament from the two most voted candidates in the popular vote. It was institutionalized in the Constitutional reform of 1994 and was the source of governability and political stability (Mayorga, 1997).

PAGE 120

120 participation, they did so at the local level. 28 repeated use of the pact making strategy, s eemed relatively stable, alternating power between those parties. I nclusion in decision making was controlled by the three parties, each leading at different times. However, the three parties were challenged by waves of civil unrest that emerged from violent protests, blockades, and strikes. The feeble economic growth achieved in the 1990s was followed by recession, aggravated by an American backed drive to eradicate coca (the raw material for cocaine). Starting in Gonzalo Snc government installed some kind of social policy as a way to directly distribute resources, but the programs were timid and short scale in relation to the aggressive policies to attract investment. Socia l discontent kept accumulating as the economy made small political parties to represent society and make convincing ideological appeals. Over the years, successes and democracy was in need of credible political alternatives to maintain its legitimacy, not only among the disadvantaged but also in the middle class, which was disgusted with the political class. Over time the political elites had become comfortable with their grab of power. Th e once praised coalitions that allowed governability did not represent much, and privileges, corruption and injustice remained the norm. The stability and elite 28 Decision making became tightly linked to decision making was composed of the most important business groups that were best linked with the external sector, state enterprises with higher productivity and a new technocracy linked to international financial organizations, with international companies and American universities, whose system of reference was given by the external sector and a neoliberal vision of the economy and society. This sector took partially the place of some p arty leaders that had traditionally managed the state, particularly in the economic area .The demands for perks and positions could only Lozada po inted out that 80% of the people seated at the main public policy decision making table during the Paz Estenssoro administration were graduates from the German Bolivian school, most of whom had studied in the US.

PAGE 121

121 pacting, inc reased the disaffection of the electorate, which saw in each administration that the vote was distorted by political leaders who responded to their own interests and who exchanged constituency support for state posts. The Victor Paz Estenssoro Reconstruct ive Presidency (1985 1989) The administration of Victor Paz Estenssoro was a reconstructive presidency, and it made possible the beginning of a new political order. Even though Paz Estenssoro and Siles grappled with the same crisis, the latter was able to turn it to his political advantage and to emerge from it as the master Bolivian politician of the twentieth century. Much as Skworonek (1993) asserts that Thomas Jefferson reconstructed the terms and conditions of legitimate national government, the presi favorably situated in political time and were able to manipulate the order shattering, order affirming and order creating components of presidential action in a consistent and mutual ly reinforcing way. Paz Estenssoro harmonized these elements in his initial leadership posture and kept this coherence throughout his administration. He secured a political formation entirely his own by standing apart from all the policies that immediately preceded him. Indeed, the fragile return to democratic politics that quickly degenerated in the Siles presidency needed strong political action to make the regime survive. Paz Estenssoro repudiated the previous actions, including his own (1952 1956; 1960 1964), and he brought a creative advantage for his government. 29 As in the previous elections, for the 1985 elections, the former dictator Banzer was the ADN candidate representing the political right. He ran for office with the support 29 but also for his capacity to lead (Whitehead, 1991).

PAGE 122

122 of the small powerfu l economic group and an emerging urban middle class (Romero et al., 19XX). 30 The MNR and the MIR raised Paz Estenssoro and Paz Zamora as presidential candidates, respectively, and other minor parties also participated. As shown in Table 4.6, Banzer received the plurality of the vote but he was not elected. The presidency went to Victor Paz Estenssoro who received the Congressional votes of the MIR and other small leftist parties. 31 After the poor economic and political management of the Siles administration w ith various corruption scandals, confrontations between legislative and executive that led to permanent impasse, as well as protests and rampant hyperinflation there was little or no trust in politicians. The environment in which Paz Estenssoro 32 became Pre sident was the least propitious possible. Because expectations were low, he used this opportunity to display his order shattering impulse. Bolivia had never found itself in such deep economic trouble. Paz Estenssoro made bold decisions, in a critical momen t when clarity and determination were needed. Having little to lose and with extensive political experience, Paz Estenssoro had the political backbone and will to tackle the 30 dictatorship when his administration propelled the expansion in infrastructure, opening productive opportunities part of the small but emerging urban middle class, that to large extent depended on the state apparatus for wages and salaries to maintain its position, and which benefited from the steady rise in public employment during his administration (Malloy and Gamarra 1988). 31 MIR refused to become part of the ad ministration given the experience with the UDP administration. For some, the leftist leaning parties that supported Paz Estenssoro intended not only to return the bold leader of the National Revolution to office, but also to obstruct the accession of Banze r, a former military dictator (Mayorga,1997). Others perceived as a democrat. Two interviewees said Banzer was afraid of becoming president. Bein g hunted by his dictatorial past, with social turmoil and economic uncertainty, Banzer preferred to become an enabler than to take full responsibility of government. He allowed the rise of Paz Estenssoro and even shared ideas of his economic plan (Intervie this; the MNR has taken full credit for the stabiliz 32 At the time he assumed the presidency, Paz Estenssoro was in his mid 70s, and he referred to this presidency as

PAGE 123

123 problems. Although he did not have a political plan to fix the economy or a cohere nt platform during the campaign, his order shattering impulse told him not to give in, as Siles had, to the demands of the unions, particularly the powerful labor union organization, Central Bolivian Labor (COB Central Obrera Boliviana). Paz Estenssoro kne w the importance of restoring authority, even if it involved using force to control social unrest. Using his order creating impulse he changed the state orientation, as well as the development model and the way the state related to society. With a bankrupt state, there was no room for populism, and Paz Estenssoro tried an experiment without any certainty of the outcome. Only three weeks after his inauguration, Paz Estenssoro approved through a decree 33 the New Economic Policy (NPE Nueva Poltica Econmica) i n order to change 34 In a very emotional speech, Paz Estenssoro e dying patient. Indeed, the NEP not only stopped hyperinflation abruptly and successfully, but it remained the landmark that formally established a shift of gears from a state run and controlled command economy to a market economy, leaving prices to the f ree market, including labor, imports, exports, interest rates, and exchange rates. 33 Supreme Decree No. 21060. 34 With no sup p ort from international agents, as Bolivia was in default, Paz Estenssoro s et up two small teams to develop an economic plan to stop hyperinflation, and he personally oversaw the making of the plans. One team was led by his Minister of Planning and Coordination, Guillermo Bedregal. Bedregal was the second most important leader of the MNR at the time; his team included technocrats who advocated for economic gradualism (heterodox plan) to stop hyperinflation. The other team was led by the President of the Senate, Gonzalo Snchez de Lozada, who was the most prosperous Bolivian busine ssman and relative a neophyte in politics, and who had never worked in public administration. The first group was the most visible one, exposed to the demands of the press, while the second group worked in secrecy. Snchez de Lozada worked with three other ministers, two lawyers, two businessmen and two economists, all who advocated for radical actions (orthodox plan), and this second team produced the NEP. Harvard professor Jeffrey Sachs helped the team by recommending the policies that would follow the in itial economic shock (Bedregal 1999, Commanding Heights 2001).

PAGE 124

124 The order affirming impulse was best displayed after only two months in office, when the MNR sought a formal alliance with ADN 35 to enact s evere policies a fter the world ma and the 36 T he administration closed mines and fired over t wenty thousand miners, dramatically reducing the size and scope of its main source of income, managed through the Mining Bolivian Corporation (COMIBOL Corporacin Minera de Bolivia). 37 Organized unions, which the government had previously deemed as corporatist institutions, came under relentless attac partisans as well. But Paz Estenssoro persisted and employed police forces and even the military to stop protests and marches. The order creating impulse materialized with t he implementatio n of strict austerity measures, a restructuring of the Central Bank and the banking system, and tax reform. The legislature passed a new currency and tax reform law, which in turn succeeded in curbing inflation, restoring confidence, both domestic and inte rnational and establishing a steady source of state income. All of these policies led to economic growth in 1987 38 for the first time in ten years, as shown in Table 4 2. However, the new policies also left citizens unprotected from market forces and led t o excessive concentration of income in few hands, widening the already deep income gap. Furthermore, the increasing urban 35 On October 17, 1985 the Pact for Democracy (Pacto por la Democracia) was signed. There was a secret Banzer in the 1989 support for the NEP to pass in Congress. 36 I n October 1985 the world market price for tin crashed. 37 The government set out to privatize state tin mines and to "relocate" mining families to the outskirts of Oruro, Cochabamba, El Alto and the lowlands of the Chapare region. 38 All numbers shown as economic indicators correspond to the previous year; therefore 1987 actually shows GDP growth in 1986.

PAGE 125

125 and rural poverty, growth of the informal economy, inability to develop a competitive productive system due to the recessionary condit ions of the economy, and the weakness of the private sector left citizens vulnerable and g enerated great social unrest. Paz Estenssoro confronted labor and social protests by imposing three states of siege and banishing labor union leaders to the north of Bolivia in order to prevent sabotage. Although the NEP was first conceived as an economic policy, it brought with it a new political order oriented toward liberalization, and substantially changed the course of Bolivian politics. With state and economic mo dernization through liberalization, there was indeed a reordering of the relations between state, society and the economy (Lazarte, 1993). The main political parties supported liberal policies, and representative democracy replaced the kind of direct democ racy that had been exercised under labor union pressure. The old logic of confrontation changed with trends toward coalition formation, which in turn facilitated governance, and power no longer depended on social hyperinflation, structural adjustment and the massive layoff of miners weakened the once powerful labor unions, enlarged the informal sector and weakened the capacity to protest and mobilize. 39 Opposition leftist groups, which had deeply rooted relations w ith social actors and interested groups, could not effectively mobilize or protest. order shattering impulse involved making decisions that were the exact opposite of the ideology that the MNR had held for decades. Paradoxically, they subs equently destroyed what Paz Estenssoro had helped to create during his previous three administrations. 39 This however did not stop protesters from exercising pressure, which Paz Estenssoro resisted. The labor movement that coalesced in COB, broke into pieces when its more powerful branch, the Union Federation of Bolivian Mine Workers (FS TMB Federacin Sindical de Trabajadores Mineros de Bolivia) saw its ranks shrink.

PAGE 126

126 As president of reconstruction, Paz Estenssoro broke with the politics of the past ed the NEP and established an alliance with Banzer, the prospects of democracy, the future of his administration and the effects of structural adjustment policies were very uncertain, because Bolivia was the first country in the world to implement shock th erapy. Paz Estenssoros decisions were bold and risky. He was ready to fight his last political battle, which did not include a secure place for his party after his administration. 40 With new politics in place, the government garnered credibility and power on new terms. Pushing Bolivia past the old troubles and envisioning a new set of opportunities altogether, he put together a new coalition of power, one that favored a market driven economy with limited state intervention. Paz Estenssoro recaptured the aut hority of being first again, and he had the unique opportunity to set up new foundations for Bolivia. Successive administrations worked within the framework provided by the NEP. 41 At the end of Paz Estenssoros administration, his party urged him to go fur ther was done. As a reconstructive President he did not need to solve further problems. The MNRs role was to continue the spirit of his policies but without him. 42 I ronically, although Paz Estenssoro did not intend to remake his party, he ended up doing it 40 Paz Estenssoro had no intention to change the Constitution to run again for office, nor did he have a plan for his party, the MNR, after his administration. After the elect oral success of ADN and MIR in the 1987 municipal elections (See Table 4 6) at the expense of the MNR, which was punished for the enormous social cost of the NEP, the prospects for the MNR to be successful in the next general election of 1989 became dim. 41 Nationalistic political order. 42 saw the success of the NEP, he embraced it as a legacy and urged the party leadership to continue with his economic program (Interview with Anonymou s BOL#11)

PAGE 127

12 7 anyway. 43 By solving the problems of the politics of the past, he provided new opportunity for politics to reconnect with society in new terms. 44 At the end of Paz Es during the Siles government, benefited from the return of power and authority to the state, with a role for political parties, instead of the barracks or the streets. The establishment of the rule o f law allowed, at least in appearance, a political system that could potentially produce binding decisions. The Jaime Paz Zamora Articulative Presidency (1989 1993) 1989. Early in the race, he announced he would not honor the secret agreement established in 1985 by Paz Estenssoro and Banzer. 45 Such agreement involved the campaign season in many regards, with ca mpaign professionals and efforts by some of was also characterized by negative campaigning which alienated voters and, as shown in Table 4 7, absenteeism rose by 8 % 46 Snchez de Lozada of the MNR the candidate with a problematic image, won the popular vote, as shown in Table 4 4. 47 Banzer was second by only 0.4 % 43 To some, Paz was not concerned about the future of his party. They affirm that Paz Estenssoro did have a preference for Snchez de Lozada over Bedregal as successor, as he saw in the former an opportunity to modernize the party, while perceivi ng Bedregal as a gatekeeper (Personal interview with Anonymous BOL#11). 44 Paz Estenssoro is considered one of the most outstanding Latin American political and economic figures (Whitehead, 2010). 45 See footnote 29. 46 hyperinflation, long queues, food shortages, and chaos, and they promised never to go back to such a situation. 47 Bolivians ( Personal interview with President Gonzalo Snchez de Lozada).

PAGE 128

128 % below the front runner The election was t horny, as thousands of votes were nullified. Moreover, an interpretation of the electoral law d eprived SDL of the presidency when Banzer of the political right supported Paz Zamora of the left. 48 Until the election, the my, Although throughout the 1989 campaign Paz Zamora strongly expressed the intention to suspend all policies related to the NEP, the Paz Zamora presidency was one of articulation of the political order. In this way, his order shattering impulse was thwarted, given that he did not reject any major commitments of the existing power sought to make. Durin keep an ordered economy and a liberal market were not modified, and a number of laws were enacted to deepen state modernization and to boost the private sector in Bolivia. The 1990 Hydro carbons Law regulated contracts and sought to attract private investment, while the 1992 Privatization Law ordered the privatization of 37 state order affirming impulse. The most important issue during the Paz Zamora administration was not related to economic policy or state modernization but rather, about strengthening democratic 48 Bolivia's Constitution required Congress to choose the president when no candidate received 50 percent of the vote. Four out of the seven members of the National Electoral Court (CNE Corte Nacional Electoral) were loyal to ADN and MIR. Because the court ruled in favor of MIR, the four members o f the court were each rewarded with a one year post as head of the customs office, which allowed them to enrich themselves. Personal interview with President Gonzalo Snchez de Lozada. See also Ultima Hora, May 29 1989; Presencia May 29, 1989 and El Mundo June 21, 1989.

PAGE 129

129 February 1992 accords between the main political parties, with the participation of the Catholic Church and other civil society organizations, specified reforms agreed upon by the three main parties. The sweeping political system reforms aimed to create institution s and ultimately to provide a long term vision for the country. These included Constitutional reform 49 modernization of the judiciary, an independent National Electoral Court (CNE), education reform, decentralization, election of the National Comptroller, trial of former dictator Garca Meza, coca industrialization and political party regulations, all of which were created but not necessarily implemented immediately. The consensus brought a new life and legitimacy to the political system (Toranzo, 2003). Ov erall, the Paz Zamora administration was able to maintain political, economic and social stability, but it refused to implement unpopular policies. Under his leadership Bolivia achieved continuous insubstantial economic growth. The strong order affirming i mpulse resulted in issuing decrees aimed at improving the conditions of growth, giving the lead role to the private sector 50 although it did not privatize any major industry. It also issued policies to reduce foreign debt, boost savings, lower interest rat es and make economic policy management more efficient. Moreover, the administration issued policies that regulated energy exports and promoted joint ventures aimed at strengthening the weak external sector in Bolivia. Although the private sector increased 49 Congress approved a law declaring the necessity of Constitutional Reform, but the reform itself was to be discussed (and passed) in the next term. 50 Besides the traditional mining and commercial businesses in the western regions of Bolivia, a new agro government, the society that developed in this region was boosted with the growth of illicit trade from cocaine and with new industrie s in the 1980s.

PAGE 130

130 its participation in the GDP, it was far from being competitive. Other steps regarding macroeconomic management were designed to reduce the fiscal deficit, rationalize public expenditures, resize the public sector, and implement infrastructure projects and social improvement. The order creating international image, was effective at the foreign relations level. His administration allowed Bolivia to be included in regional market agreements, and it strengt hened relations with neighboring countries and other multinational blocks. Moreover, through accords with Peru, his administration opened access for the country to the Pacific. Peru granted Bolivia free port status in the coast town of Ilo, a step toward t time dream to return to the Pacific. Another order creating impulse rested in the wever, the proposed legislation did not progress. 51 While most of the program was not implemented effectively, the administration addressed the issue in the context of the NEP, thereby committing to the order created by the Paz Estenssoro administration. Alt hough Paz Zamora was a President of articulation, he was not a particularly orthodox innovator, despite his timid attempts to modernize the state. But his administration was innocuous to the political order already in place, although in practice 51 The issue of decentralization, a long time desire that regional elites demanded for decades, was brought to discussion. Bolivia had a tradition of strong centralization, in which all important political issues were decided in La Paz, and each administration considered costs and benefits in terms of its patronage and clientelistic network. In 1988 there was an attempt to decentralize social services, but it did not progress. In 1990 the administration formally proposed decentralization to the departments, which was discussed and approved in 1993 by the Senate. But it did not pass the deputies chamber due to opposition by Congressmen led by the MNR. The Fiscal Administration System and Control Law (SAFCO Sistema de Administracin Fiscal y C ontrol) of 1990 law passed, and its regulations were passed two and a half years later, in November of 1992. However, little was done to actually implement and enforce the laws.

PAGE 131

131 the admini technocrats and damaged the political system further (Lozada and Saavedra, 1998). The Gonzalo Snchez de Lozada Articulative Presidency (1993 1997) In his first administration Gonzalo S nchez de Lozada was an articulative president. His affiliation with the political order that started with Paz Estenssoro (1985 1989) was rooted in the belief that the work of Paz Estenssoro could be continued by deepening reforms and even taking them to a whole new level. That was the focus of his first administration. Yet, SDL had been sensitized by his experience, after losing the congress vote in 1989, traveling throughout Bolivia and witnessing first hopelessness after hearing politicia ns repeat the same promises and not seeing their lives improve. Indeed, indigenous peoples in remote areas of the country transmitted their sense of disconnection with the state, but SDL envisioned Bolivia as a modern country, where people would feel part of the country, a country economically viable and politically stable. He came to believe that direct governmental action was not an option. As an alternative, he adopted a more overtly political and institutional approach toward change. As shown in Table 4 garnered an uncontested plurality of the vote with 36 % of the valid votes. 52 Moreover, as shown in Table 4 4 in Congress, the MNR held almost two thirds of the Senate seats and a large plurali With fifteen points ahead of second place Banzer, SDL had a strong mandate. After the election, SDL forged a coalition with two other parties, along with the Revolutionary Movement of Liberation 52 Snchez de Lozada ran again for the presidency after being denied the presid ency in 1989. With a dusky personal history in party politics, he had being active through his party in Congress in proposing institutional reforms, and he

PAGE 132

132 Tupac Karari (MRTKL Movimi ento Revolucionario Tupac Katari de Liberacin) that was already part of the presidential ticket. The coalition formed by the MNR, MRTKL, MBL (Movimiento Bolivia Libre) and Civic Solidarity Union (UCS Union Cvica Solidaridad) allowed him to count on more than the required two thirds of Congressional votes to pass laws. 53 Because the leaders of the coalition parties represented to some extent the range of traditional social sectors the administration had an extensive network of contacts in critical sectors. 54 Snchez de Lozada arrived in office determined to modernize Bolivia, and to it able to withstand competition in globalized markets. The strategy was to boost the economy by carrying out vast reforms for an inclusive, sustainable structure and employment opportunities. He also came to office seeking to integrate Bolivians who felt the state was an artificial construction completely out of touch with their lives and needs. In order to set up his administration in a way that would allow him to pursue his l eadership project, SDL started by changing the traditional way in which the executive was organized and the logic under which it operated. This was his order shattering impulse. He changed the underlying organizational mode of governance, from control by p olitical parties to reliance on technocrats. While he did not dismiss political calculations, these were not discussed with the party but with personal advisors and 53 The coalition wa s not free from problems. In September 1994, UCS left the coalition after disagreements regarding its role in the administration. However, seven UCS members broke ranks and remained in the government coalition, still giving Snchez de Lozada a majority in the Chamber of Deputies. In June 1995, Max Fernndez, the UCS founder and leader, brought his party back into the administration. The UCS was a coalition partner in ied, UCS remained in the coalition under the leadership of his son, Johnny Fernndez, whose opportunism led him to ascribe to the 54 Snchez de Lozada represented the business elite, the vice president was a long time fighter for indigenous demands, and Free Bolivia Movement (MBL leftist traditions in Bolivia. MBL was an excision of MIR that split in 1984. Max Fernndez was the lea der of the personalistic party UCS, which lacked a clear ideology, had populist roots to assure favors to its constituents, and held a significant clientelistic network.

PAGE 133

133 international consultants. 55 He reduced the number of ministries in his cabinet, from 18 to 10, emphasizing three areas (ministries) that became his priorities: economic development, human development, and the ministry of the environment and sustainable development. 56 It took at least two months for the executive branch to start functioning under the new design. The distribution of duties, hierarchies and organizational levels brought it to near paralysis as conflicts between the three independent ministries emerged, each of which struggling to defend its area of influence. The lack of cohesion and consistency impaired the work of the administration, which lost time while still on a honeymoon with the electorate. The state bureaucracy remained staffed with party loyalists. The administration distributed state offices between the coalition partners, but for top cabinet positions SDL hired technocrats 57 who shared his vision. 58 Snchez de Lozada also relied on the ideas and expertise of the Millennium Foundation (Fundacin Milenio), a think tank he created after his electoral defeat of 1989. 59 The founda tion became the most important place where public policies were NPE, SDL emulated the process of policy making for his own administration by relying on technocrats, young professionals, international consultants, 60 and top scholars like Juan Linz and Dieter Nohlen. The former were hired to advice on Constitutional reform. 55 Snchez de Lozada was the first president of Bolivia to govern by testing messages a nd measuring public opinion based on scientific tools with constant polls and focus groups. 56 Bolivia was the first country in Latin America to include explicitly the concept of sustainable development in its organizational structure, taking into consider ation environmental issues linked to development. 57 See Toranzo (2009). 58 The expansion of public sector white collar workers in the previous administration resulted in a new class of professionals. 59 Snchez de Lozada himself was an innovator (See Graha m, 1997; Mesa, 2008; Grindle, 2000; Greenberg 2009). He grew up with progressive ideas because of his family and education. However, the most important experience that shaped his vision for the country happened during his extensive travels around Bolivia b etween 1989 and 1993 ( Personal interview with President Gozalo Snchez de Lozada). 60 reform in the early 1980s, see Weyland (2005).

PAGE 134

134 Another renowned scholar was Jeffrey Sachs who advised on macroeconomic issues. order creating imp ulse consisted precisely in the policy making that emerged outside Congress and his coalition partners, including his own party. Despite the fast making style focused minutely on p roposals. This allowed him to control decision making but slowed implementation. He participated actively in policy presentations, where technocrats offered different proposals for him to choose, buy the proceedings were not open to debate or to the public 61 Following his order affirming impulse, SDL emboldened secular changes at work and engaged in an aggressive campaign for political maintenance. He grasped the potential of the neoliberal era for building new kinds of institutions, and he harnessed that potential to the cause of rearticulating the commitments of the established political order at a higher level of achievement. There were two sets of reforms: institutional with Constitutional and Judicial reforms, 62 and a broad program to deepen economic an d political reforms. With the benefit of a majority in both chambers of congress, t he enactment of the laws was rapid. After the laws were drafted in isolation and their content and implementation were briefly discussed with stakeholders (Grindle, 2000). S everal factors played favorably for SDL and allowed him to become a strong president: lack of other political alternatives, leaving his coalition with a comfortable majority; weak opposition in Congress; and the rapid timetable of the reforms which stunned opponents, the media, analysts and public opinion. Indeed, as we will see in the 61 Snchez d e Lozada participated actively in the making of the laws, attending some meetings and setting out the tone of the laws, which aimed to be irreversible and radical in decentralizing political and economic power. 62 Opposition to Judicial reform surfaced fro elimination of political patronage slots in the Judiciary; see Van Cott (2000).

PAGE 135

135 following paragraphs, these sweeping reforms were launched one after the other in a relatively short period of time. The dynamic overwhelmed the opposition in Congress, as we ll as media and critics, all of whom were not able to suggest alternatives, or to keep up, simply because they were too intricate legislation. According to constitutional reform procedures, the Constitutional reform process was initiated in the Paz Zamora administration. But during SDL I the content of the Constitutional reform was drafted, discussed and approved. The first chapter of the new Constitution stated a new definition of Bolivia, recognizing its multiethnic and pluralistic cultural identity. More over, it acknowledged the overlapping cultural traditions of the West with indigenous traditions and stated that Bolivia was not only a unitary country, but also a diverse one, a place where different cultures, ethnic groups and ecosystems live under the p rotection of the Republic. Formal recognition in the highest legal document of the country was a major step to legally acknowledge the coexistence of several cultures in the country, and it required government policy to address and respond to the dispariti es and distinctions of the country. This formal recognition provided legitimacy, not only to the administration that passed the Constitution, but to the entire political system (Albo, 2008). However, even though this specific aspect of the Constitutional r eform garnered support from the indigenous by empowering them, it was a top down approach which did not effectively represent their interests (Madrid 2005). 63 The reform, which was enacted in August 1994, included: the election of the President by the Cong ress among the two most voted candidates when no candidate 63 The traditional political parties ADN, MNR, and MIR did not represent the indigenous. Political parties sometimes addressed their concerns but they did not truly represent the people. In successive elections, the indigenous were part of electoral lists but were not in top positions, with only CONDEPA and UCS having some indigenous representatives. Only in the electio ns of 2002 did political parties address indigenous representation seriously, as the lists of NFR, Asamblea de la Soberania de los Pueblos (ASP), MIP, and MAS demonstrated.

PAGE 136

136 reached 50 plus 1 % of the vote; the extension of the presidential and Congressional terms from four to five years; provisions to restrain changes to the Constitution; the direct election of half of the 130 member Chamber of Deputies, making members of Congress more accountable to their districts and less dependent on the parties and the executive branch. The Constitutional change also incorporated elective local government at the municipal le vel and extensive judicial reform. The Constitutional Reform was side lined for a while in March 1994, when Congress passed the Capitalization Law. In the months that followed its approval, there was strong opposition, particularly by unions. Indeed, this law touched national interests by establishing that half of the Bolivian state investors, angering unions, which for years had enjoyed privileges whether or not state companies were efficient or productive. Furthermo re, when it was found that the investors interested in buying the stock were foreigners, a campaign of disinformation Snchez de Lozada who spoke Spanish with an America n accent, was identified with those foreign interests. Despite attempts to show how Bolivian he was, his image was quickly tarnished, leading to opposition outside Congress for every law subsequently The broad agenda of reforms 64 included an innovative type of privatization that was a strategy to attract investments. Parts of the state owned government, through private pension funds, held 50 % of the stock of the capitalized 64 For a comprehensive account of the reforms see Fundacin Milenio (1998).

PAGE 137

137 companies, with the investors (all foreign), holding the other 50 % and remaining in cont rol of the companies. The capitalized companies were telecommunications (ENTEL ), electricity (ENDE Empresa Nacional de Electricidad), railroads (ENFE Empresa Nacional de Ferrocarriles), petroleum (YPFB Yacimientos Petrolferos Fiscales Bolivianos), and th e national airline (LAB Lloyd Areo Boliviano ), while the national foundry (ENV Empresa Metalrgica Vinto) was left to be capitalized in the next administration. When the law of capitalization passed, the state changed in size and role, no longer serving a s economic planner or as producer. Instead, the state was transformed into a regulator of services, with superintendencies responsible for the regulation of specific sectors (energy, water, transportation, telecommunications and forestry among others) and for the quality of the services. The Law of Popular Participation, enacted in April 1994, was the next most significant and politically innovative reform after the Constitutional Reform. Popular Participation effectively decentralized the country by trans ferring power to 311 municipal governments across the country, with elected mayors and councils. Moreover, it transferred resources using a distributive criterion based on population count. It was a leap of giants, considering that before the reform the st ate resources were distributed mostly to the capitals of the departments. For some observers, this experiment was one of the most far reaching and ambitious achievements to expand democracy at local levels in Latin America (Seligson, 1999a, 1999b; Thede 20 11). At the national level the Popular Participation was also one of the most ambitious attempts in the history of the country to break the traditional centralism. Indeed, it was a revolution in the sense that it

PAGE 138

138 took the state to all the regions of the co untry, but at the same time it also increased the appetite for autonomy in the regions. Snchez de Lozada was opposed to complete regional autonomy. In a country as frail as Bolivia, with a history of wars with resource hungry neighbors who stripped from i ts territory, and with strong centrifugal tendencies, providing autonomy to the d ecentralization was not to grant autonomy to regional governments; on the contrary, it was a way for the central government to have control over the departments. Prefectures (the name of the regional administrative authority) depended on the central government for their resources, which derived from state revenue, as well as from a percentage of the mining, oil and hydrocarbon revenue existent in some producer departments. The law opened a new layer of bureaucracy that could benefit the MNR, MRTKL and MBL parties but it kept pivotal appointments at the regional level under presidential control. 65 Regional political e lites, which sought independent regional power, not local power, were strong opposition for the administration. 66 Somewhat tied to popular participation was the June 1994 Education Reform, which gave municipalities and local communities greater control over their schools. However, before transferring responsibility to municipalities, the administration and knowledge, provide training opportunities, and eliminates the requisite of being unionized to work in public schools. 65 (2003) argues that when national parties believe that sub national offices will be important to them in the future, they seek to make these offices more attractive and powerful by devolving powers from the national level. Bolivia decentralized in the 1990 s when the parties judged their chances of holding on to the national executive branch to be quite slim. 66 For an account of regionalism in Bolivia, see Roca (2008).

PAGE 139

139 Capitalization was related to pension and social security reform, in that it allowed for a distribution of dividends of the capitaliz ed companies in the form of pension payments for Bolivians who at the time of the capitalization were older than 65 years of age. According to SDL, BONOSOL as it was called, it was not only a fair deal for the elderly, but it was an outstanding mechanism of cash transfer for investment or consumption. Since the structure of the typical Bolivian family involved grandparents living with their children, grandchildren and so on, the BONOSOL not only dignified the elderly but also provided the entire family wit h a reasonable sum to use for their needs. 67 Two additional important reforms were approved by Congress in October 1996: the National Institute of Agrarian Reform (INRA Instituto Nacional de Reforma Agraria), which regulated land tenure and continued agrari an reform; and the Forestry Law of July 1996, which regulated use and exploitation of forestry resources. T leader, Hugo Banzer, retired from politics in December of 1993, and in March 1994 Jaime Paz resigned from politics after accusations of campaign finance by drug dealers implicated party members. 68 While the reforms passed without complications, the MIR scandal placed ADN as the most important opposition force and strengthen ed its position in the political arena. Banzer, returned to the political arena and announced his presidential bid for 1997, less than eight months after a dramatic resignation from politics, and Jaime Paz resumed leadership of the MIR and also announced h is candidacy. The rest of the opposition parties were too small to have a strong stance 67 Personal interview with President Gonzalo Snchez de Lozada. 68 s withdrawn by the Embassy because of allegations of links to drug traffickers. Two MIR ministers were involved in corruption scandals, and a four year sentence was placed upon the head of the party, Oscar Eid, for having maintained links with drug traffic kers. In January 1996, the U.S. permanently withdrew visas

PAGE 140

140 against the administration. M otherland Consciousness (CONDEPA Conciencia de Patria), under its populist leader Carlos Palenque, was the only political party that openly criticized the reforms. 69 which wanted to maintain c ontrol, coca growers who resisted coca eradication and drug trafficking policies; and regional governments and councils, whi ch demanded the extension of autonomous powers. Anti imperialist slogans became appealing as the presence and influence of the U.S. Drug Enforcement Agency (DEA) was defended by the administration. The attempts to compromise were difficult and perceived by the strikers as a sign of weakness in the administration (Gamarra, 1996: 72 98). Police and military repression occurred several times during SDL I, most frequently involving coca eradication. In April 1995, opposition to reforms led the three protesting groups to engage in marches, blockades, and strikes, effectively paralyzing the country. With congressional approval, SDL ordered a state of emergency which lasted six months, and hundreds of teachers and union leaders were banished to remote areas. Among the first three articulative presidencies analyzed up to this point, SDL I became the zenith of the political order, making it more robust. SDL pushed all of the reforms with courage and stubbornness, to the point that his assurance of the rightfulness of the reforms often bordered on arrogance. 70 A characteristic of his administration was the particular attention placed on the legality of the presidential 69 CONDEPA was founded in 1988 by its charismatic leader Carlos Palenque. It was a person alistic populist party with class appeals that denounced the lack of state policies to provide welfare for citizens living in poverty. Part of its leadership consisted of a recycled group of leftist politicians who held strong nationalistic views. These he lped 70 The use of police and military force at times caused more problems than solutions. For example in a deathly event in December 1996, miners of Amayapam pa and Capacirca clashed with police forces after taking control of a mine that was exploited by a foreign company. Police defended the property of the foreign investors, and the result was 11 deaths.

PAGE 141

141 actions. Even though at times SDL seemed too powerful and forceful, his actions were backed by laws an d even obscure rules, which the administration was quick to point to as way keep legitimacy. considered the governm ent had a hidden agenda. As he built new national supervising institutions, he finished dismantling statism. Capitalization and privatization raised cared for his people. His communication skills did not help him either, or his lack of instinct to bond with people. Because SDL found opposition when trying to assert authority, he had to ref ashion legitimacy on his own terms. He was an orthodox innovator. As Skowronek (1993) asserts, articulative leaders such as SDL exercise power without projecting a political alternative to what had come before, but they grasp new possibilities without impu gning the existing political foundations. He completed the second generation reforms, a long pending political agenda, without igniting dissent from those committed to the prior consensus. He also planted the roots of a more participative democracy at the local level, and he sought to boost a national identity by making it more diverse and inclusive. However, at the national level, policies and state orientation remained determined by the ruling elite. Courting some of the most aggressive innovators of his day in Bolivia (i.e. Carlos Hugo Molina, Guillermo Justiniano, Victor Hugo Cardenas, and Miguel Urioste) and in the world (i.e. Jeffrey Sachs, Stanley Greenberg, and Juan Linz), at the end of his administration Bolivia became a showcase of reform. S nchez

PAGE 142

142 de Lozada stamped Bolivia with the dreams and ideas of these Bolivians and top professionals and after SDL term these individuals went all over the world to spread reforms. S nchez de Lozada was prompted to exercise power as a continuation of the Paz Este nssoro administration. But, with his own brand of leadership, he took a greater leap forward along the path already traced. His political authority rested in demonstrating the integrity of the political order and its relevance in new circumstances. If Paz Estenssoro was able to return credibility to the idea of Bolivia as a nation, laying job was to restore the belief that Bolivia was a viable nation. His first presiden cy focused on that goal by continuing with further neoliberal policies that aimed to integrate Bolivia into the globalized world, as well as to strengthen Bolivia as a nation state with political inclusion, cultural integration and power sharing. S nchez de Lozada administration sought venues to integrate Bolivia into emerging economic trends and to provide opportunities for commerce at a time when free trade agreements started to become the norm. In preparation for further steps, Bolivia joined the Worl d Trade Organization (WTO) in 1995 and became an associate member of Mercosur in 1997. With regards to foreign relations, the most important issue was a deal with the U.S. embassy to maintain strict coca eradication policies in exchange for aid and credit. Virtually all presidents since the return to democratic politics have been strained by the U.S. and its war on drugs. Except for unions and coca growers, most citizens came to appreciate the reforms, realizing that the reforms were better than the status quo. However, this

PAGE 143

143 acceptance did not necessarily translate into political support for SDL, because his persona produced strong negative reactions. He lacked the capacity to empathize and was perceived as arrogant, domineering, overconfident, condescendin g and patronizing. The most important and positive outcome of the reforms was the opening of the local political sphere. This created space for greater political agency on the part of previously excluded groups of citizens, i.e. the indigenous and women. N eoliberal politics transformed concepts and the ways of thinking: constitutional reform turned the o citizens; capitalization turned workers into owners and dignified elders, and provided better services to Bolivians; privatization turned users into clients; and educational reform improved social opportunities by providing better education. In one way o r another, all of these reforms strengthened the state, whether by taking away functions that could be better performed by the private sector, by opening state posts to professionals, by organizing the multiple bureaucratic layers, by making the state more responsive to virtually no state presence. Bolivia became a case study for policy makers and multilateral creditors. SDL did not copy development recipes from others. rapid enrichment made Bolivians suspicious of the immediate benefits of the reforms. In one of his last actions as President, SDL signed a d ecree transferring full ownership of Bolivia's hydrocarbon processes to multinational corporations. The state action was

PAGE 144

144 limited to supervision and collection of 18 % on taxes on exploration and exports. With the enactment of these laws and decrees, the idea of state control of a strategic resource, particularly its most important natural resource, was abandoned. 71 S nchez de Lozada articulative at the same time, without being reconstructive. Bolivi an politics were changed because of the actions of SDL in his first presidency; some of the reforms he led were not pressing demands that he happened to answer. Most of the issues the reforms brought to the table were not in the public discourse but were n ecessities that needed to be addressed, but that had been neglected for too long. At the time of his presidency the country did not have a clear route. With the structural reforms in 1989 1992, the country became a stable patient, but there was no certaint y of when and if the surviving country could be actually cured. The SDL presidency brought hope back to the ailing country, not rhetorically, but factually. Despite the negative side effects of the reforms particularly with distribution of benefits, the sh attering effect democratization. His reforms cleared the route the country was taking. The ADN Administration: The Articulative Presidency of Hugo Banzer and Jorge Quiroga (1997 2002) The stakes were high for the general elections of 1997. For the first time in the senate and the other half of Judiciary Council. 71 The 1990 hydrocarbons law, declared that the state ow ned the reserves, production and distribution of gas and therefore benefited from the production, distribution and use of the surplus.

PAGE 145

145 Banzer (ADN) led a pre electoral alliance with the New Republican Force (NFR Nueva Fuerza Republica na) 72 and the Christian Democratic Party (PDC, Partido Democrtico Cristiano). 73 Paz Zamora (MIR) led a coalition with the Revolutionary Left Front (FRI Frente Revolucionario de Izquierda). 74 Re election was banned, and MNR reduced its chances to win the ele ctions after it changed the nomination of an independent candidate, Rene Blattman, to Juan Carlos Duran. 75 With the death of its founders, U CS and CONDEPA, the two populist parties that had increasingly gained had two patch candidates Ivo Kuljis and Remedios Loza, respectively. 76 The electoral results separated the two top contestants by 4 % but the difference between the second, third and fourth was very small. Banzer (ADN) led the vote with 22 % J uan Carlos Duran (MNR) 18 % Remedios Loza (CONDEPA) 17 % and Paz Zamora (MIR) 17 % almost tied to Kuljis (UCS) 16 % As shown in Table 4 4, in om having control of either of the chambers. Hugo Banzer was elected President by Congress after he forged unlikely alliances with MIR, UCS, and CONDEPA. With these alliances, Banzer was able to 72 NFR was founded in 1995 to run in municipal elections in the city of Cochabamba. The leader, Manfred Reyes Villa, becam e major and used the party as a personal vehicle. Previous to the election, he was a military partisan of ADN. 73 The PDC was a small party that had not participated in general elections since 1985. Since then it was part of the ADN electoral lists. 74 The F a strong hold in Tarija, having won the municipal elections on various occasions. 75 Snchez de Lozada designated Ren Blattmann as the MNR presidential candidate, and the decision was ratified at the MNR national convention of January 1997 By some accounts the rivalry of two strong party leaders, Juan Carlos Duran and Carlos Snchez Berzain, forced Blattmann to resign, as he was an independent and found no support in the party (Interviews with Anonymous BOL#7, and Anonymous BOL#15) Others argued that and Snchez de Lozada withdrew his suppo rt perceiving him as a potentially formidable political rival. 76 Both leaders died unexpectedly; Fernndez died in a plane crash in November 1995, and Carlos Palenque died of a heart attack in March 1997, only a few months before the presidential election.

PAGE 146

146 garner two thirds of the congressional seats, making it easy for his administration to pass most legislation. The nature of the governing coalition was problematic, because the parties did not share a programmatic view, nor was the coalition a coherent alliance with a strong guidance from either Banzer or his party. After assuming power, Banzer spent his first six months distributing power quotas, trying to meet the coalition rom the very start, CONDEPA created tensions by demanding control of Santa Cruz, the most powerful regional government, and by threatening to vote against its partners unless it was granted the presidency of either the lower or upper chambers. Less than a year in office, i n August 1998 CONDEPA was expelled from the governing coalition. CONDEPA contributed little to policy makin g, 77 but its contradictions in the legislature, 78 rent seeking behavior, and pressure for more government positions aggravated Banzer. 79 In February 2000, the NFR was also forced out of the coalition because of its constant criticism of the administration, its refusal to pass legislation to raise taxes, and its constant pressure for more state posts. From then on, the Banzer administration depended on the support of opposition deputies in order to maintain its majority in the Deputies chamber, although it st ill held a two thirds majority in the Senate. The administration engaged in two National Dialogues which were the utmost order creating efforts, with the objective to draft a poverty reduction strategy, to become eligible for debt write off, and to coordin ate foreign aid. The dialogues involved the 77 Ballivian, 2003:91). 78 One of the clearest examples occurred when the administration proposed the elimination of the BONOSOL. First CONDEPA voted f 79 By the 2002 elections, CONDEPTA had lost base support and become a patronage vehicle for the urban Aymara counter elite of La Paz.

PAGE 147

147 participation of various sectors of political and civic organizations, creating expectations that the administration could not fulfill the need. Moreover, it bypassed political system institutions such as Congres dialogues, including poverty reduction, coca eradication, fight against corruption and institutional reforms. To a large extent the dialogues addressed the demands of donors and external veto players, in particular the U.S. government and multilateral institutions, so that Bolivia could become eligible for debt relief. 80 As a result of the dialogues, most President, Jorge Quiroga who emerged as a power figure in the administration. He was a good communicator and an efficient administrator. 81 Furthermore, it gave the impression that ADN was a party undergoing generational renewal. As shown in Figures 4 1 and 4 2, vice presidential approval was almo st double the approval of the President. 82 The Banzer (and Quiroga) administration was an articulative presidency because it was committed to continue the established path since 1985. Banzer assumed office less to make his reputation than to embellish it w ith a democratic aura. He continued with the neoliberal path of reducing the size of the state by granting greater resources to regions and autonomy to local communities, selling off nearly all state enterprises, and broadening schooling, pensions and land ownership. While the administration increased spending on social policies, infrastructure, and low debt incentives for small businesses, it maintained a strict macroeconomic discipline already 80 By 1998 Bolivia was part of the Heavily Indebted Poor Countries strategy (HIPC), it received debt relief in accordance to World Bank and IMF initiatives. After the second National Dialog in 2000 Bolivia became eligible for a second, enhanced HIPC initiative. 81 Historically, the vice president was a pol itical figure that did not play a key role in policymaking. 82 Some interviewees argued that there was indeed a strong current of change in ADN when it was led by Quiroga. time party comrades. The internecine struggle Particularly salient were the differences over fighting corruption and the 1999 Customs Law.

PAGE 148

148 in place and achieved moderate growth, as shown in Tables 4 2 and 4 administration, GDP grew an average of 2.47 % and GDP per capita grew an average of 0.35 % However, the ADN administration was challenged by a world economic recession starting in 1999 that resulted in increased unemploym ent and lower living standards. 83 (Nogales, 2001). The order shattering impulse of the Banzer adminis tration consisted in trying to imprint its own brand on the reforms of the SDL I administration (Garca Montero, 2001). However, some of the changes were more than cosmetic variations. The reforms of the previous administration did not stand on their own. For instance, the great emphasis and resources held by popular participation during the MNR administration were scant changed the meaning of the reforms without alterin g their spirit. Such was the case of the BONOSOL, which was transformed into BOLIVIDA. The sources of the cash transfer that elder Bolivians received distorted the way the capitalization dividends were 84 As shown in Table 4 2 and Table 4 3, the pace of the economy slowed year, GDP growth decreased by 4.60 % formal unemployment increased by 3.0 % an d 83 The Brazilian devaluation and Bolivian economy. 84 The BONOSOL program, because the Banzer administration considered that the assignment of resources generated by Capitalization Funds was arbitrary, and f avored other social projects instead. The BOLIVIDA was a cash transfer program that did not resemble the BONOSOL. It paid elders above 65 years of age a monthly sum that was not intended for investment but merely for consumption (Martinez, 2004).

PAGE 149

149 GDP growth per capita decreased by 4.59 % The combined effects of poor capacity for recuperation deficient living conditions and economic performance led to increasing natural resources to the benefit of foreign interests, led to violent confrontations between government forces and citizens. 85 Even though protests, blockades and riots had been common since 1982, they reappeared with renewed strength during th e Banzer/Quiroga presidency. Four sources of protests besieged the ADN administration urban protesters affected by tariff increases. Three of the four leaders of the prote sts formed their own parties and openly contested the establishment. 86 Of the four types of protests, the one that caused the most shocking reaction involved the water users. With April, 2000 in the city of Cochabamba and again in Septemb er 2000, along with indigenous protests that started on the Bolivian Altiplano, a new wave of protests appeared, signaling the awakening of new social movements (Van Cott, 2003, 2007; Toranzo, 2009). These protests disrupted not only the final two years o f the ADN administration under the presidencies of Hugo Banzer (1997 2001) and Jorge Quiroga (2001 02), but also the next administration. Three key moments shifted the way politics evolved. The first was in April 2000 with the protests over the increase of water services tariffs. Behind the initial reaction of the population, there was a growing sense of discontent with the administration that seemed too outwardly oriented and more 85 Conflic ts increased for a second time during the democratic period, starting in 1997 2005, (Evia et al., 2008). 86 Felipe Quispe was the leader of highland peasants who founded their own party, the Indigenous Movement Pachacuti (MIP Movimiento Indgena Pachacuti ). He protested the lack of state attention in the rural areas, proposing that the state was racist and a new indigenous and authentic state should exist instead. Evo Morales, leader of the coca growers also founded his MAS party. Oscar Olivera became the leader of Cochabamba water users, but he transformed the original protest of tariff into an antiglobalization movement. Wilma Plata was a long time leader of the teachers union. The government gave in to teachers demands, and her actions were restricted to the union (Rojas 2007).

PAGE 150

150 legitimized by the international community than by Bolivian citizens. Bolivi ans did not see the administration effectively implementing the National Dialog recommendations, particularly in the social areas. The second moment occurred during the September October protests, which revealed a new political dynamic, in which administra tion promises and hopes no longer found support. Social movements displayed their frustrations in protests, marches and blockades, questioning the validity of the called attention to ongoing problems such as the lack of running water in rural knowing that these demands could not be met, protesters realized that the administration was extremely we ak and that they could take action on their own. The third moment was the transfer of presidential power from Banzer to Quiroga, who stood legitimacy, and he insisted on politics as usual but with a twist. The lack of economic resources or the state capacity to fulfill government commitments left his actions hollow. order affirming initial impulse was to protect investments and to stop protes ters to keep order in a violent repression. 87 Initially, the administration declared a state of emergency, but it eventually conceded to a reduction international business c onsortium. Between April and September 2000 the Banzer administration reluctantly signed over 100 agreements, which it did not fulfill, with 87 The Water War of April 2000 was a local massive protest in the city of Cochabamba. It started when the utility company, which was a foreign company with some domestic participation, dramatically raised the price for the service and supply of water. The aftermath of the clashes between protesters and government resulted in 10 dead, 22 injured and 135 arrested.

PAGE 151

151 different social sectors, each with its own demands. Even though the ADN administration was articulative when the demands, the fragility of the political authority appeared clearly, giving the administration the appearance of a disjunctive presidency. The cracks in the political order became even more evident with simultaneous prote sts from different groups, escalating from increasing salaries and benefits to challenges to the white/mestizo political and social identity of the Bolivian state and the basis and logic of the development model. Protesters demands included pay raises, rej ection of coca 88 increase of resources for education and other services, land tenure legalization, and welfare demands. Although the gravity of the conflicts was softened by the intervention of t he Catholic Church, the new agreements, questions over the fragility of democracy arose as protesters and politicians started to call for a new Constituent Assembly, one t hat would renew the relationship between state and society and provide a new base of legitimacy. 89 Because of the poor political management, even establishment leaders questioned the existing authority. 90 The permanent discourse of the new social movements which attacked neoliberalism, denounced clientelistic practices, alleged corruption at all levels, and renewed the nationalistic sentiment, slowly carved into the social psyche, convincing citizens that the development model itself and the system of repr esentation in place 88 econo my, and aid conditioned by the U.S. Embassy, etc. 89 In April 2001 another conflict took place as the administration was about to launch another phase of coca eradication. Several groups joined the coca producers and made their own demands. 90

PAGE 152

152 were failures. 91 Moreover, with Banzer trying to erase his dictatorial past by seeking conciliation and giving in easily, presidential authority was weakened. In August 2001, Banzer resigned as President of Bolivia. Although a power vac 92 As the Constitution established, he was replaced by Vice President Jorge Quiroga, President w as an attempt to reassert his authority. He ordered the militarization of the coca growing region of Chapare, resulting in deadly clashes between military and coca producers which peaked in October 2001. Furthermore, the administration sought to delegitimi ze Evo Morales, the leader of the coca growers and the single member district most voted representative in Congress (De la Quintana, 2000). 93 The ADN administration of Banzer and Quiroga was articulative with strong signs of a disjunctive presidency. Becau se of their political identity and affiliation with the status quo, they were prompted to render their terms as repetitions of the received premises. By implementing their program and trying to fashion their place in history, they enervated the political o vision that included both received commitments and present possibilities, leaving behind 91 As Laserna (2003:11) correctly points out "social conflicts do not emerge from given situations, even if they are unjust and unequal, but from social saliency and visibility, and from th e perception that they can be modified". See also Gamarra (2002). 92 A public opinion survey asked about an evaluation of the Banzer presidency. While he ended his presidency with 18% approval, his administration received lukewarm credit for certain policie s. The five most recognized positive aspects were coca eradication 39%, the contract to sell gas to Brazil 18%, BOLIVIDA 8%, Judicial reform 6%, and fight against poverty and anticorruption 3%. On the other hand, the worst aspects were; economic management 28%, anticorruption 15%, fight against poverty 13%, conflict management 9%, contract to sell gas to Brazil 8% (IPSOS Apoyo, September 2001). 93 At the beginning of 2002, Congress overwhelmingly approved a unique measure to expel Morales for his participati Sin La Rgida Poltica De Erradicacin De La Hoja De Coca No Habra Habido Evo Morales", Observatorio Electoral Latinoamericano (2002),

PAGE 153

153 confusion and recrimination. By facilitating the implementation of new policies, they (more Banzer than Quirog a) caricatured the irrelevance of the political pacts. By Banzer was somehow obsessed with matters that involved seeking personal approval of and showing proper democratic comportment, but he had little else to offer by way of parties in Congress were not constructive, nor did they act responsibly. Particularly disappointing was the MNR, which did not offer alternative solutions to the conflicts of the ADN administration. Moreover, the MNR was not an opposition that offered input to strengthen political institutions and long term policies; instead the MNR focused on criticism as a politica l tactic. The MNR tried so hard to differentiate from the administration that it did not defend the spirit of its own policies. The Gonzalo Snchez de Lozada Disjuctive Presidency (2002 2003) The second presidency of Gonzalo Snchez de Lozada was disjunct ive As the previous section suggested, the neoliberal political order in place was already in peril. Over time the enacted policies did not stand on their own. Since they were implemented top down instead of being socialized and supported at the grassroo ts level and their legitimacy corroded when promises were not delivered. Snchez de Lozada second administration did not preempt the demise of the order; it actually upheld the establishment commitments by affirming political continuity. 94 The alliances he 94 Decomposition of the political order was evident as early as 1999. In the December m unicipal elections, the three mainstream parties, MNR (20%), ADN (15%) and MIR (16%) garnered 51% of the national vote. However the results could be misleading when the support for the parties is seen as a percentage of the national vote share. By 1999, ma ny local candidates, from either new regional political organizations or independents, had won key won municipal elections. This has also bee n the case in Santa Cruz since 1997 and in Cochabamba since 1993.

PAGE 154

154 established contributed to expand an already vulnerable set of government commitments. June 2002 general elections is necessary, as it explains the fragile legitimacy with whic h he started his term. As in the previous election in which SDL participated, he was the candidate who best represented the establishment. Not only did he campaign promising to continue his work, but his affiliation with the party that brought to life the neoliberal political order made him the upholder of what was wrong in politics and the development model that promised so much and delivered so little. Candidates of eleven he avyweights as presidential hopefuls: two former presidents with Gonzalo Snchez de Lozada (MNR) and Jaime Paz Zamora (MIR); three former mayors of the most important departmental capital cities with Manfred Reyes Villa (NFR), Ronald McLean (ADN), and Johnn y Fernndez (UCS), 95 and the most important leaders of the anti system movements, Evo Morales (MAS) and Felipe Quispe (MIP). 96 At the start of the campaign, the issues focused on: Constitutional reform, particularly referring to the end of the monopoly of re presentation held by political parties; 97 questions over the appropriate role of the state in the economy, particularly in land legislation and the administration of the recently found hydrocarbon wealth. As the campaign progressed, 95 Cochabamba, La Paz and Santa Cruz, respectively. 96 Other candidates were the independents Rene Blattmann Bauer (MCC) and Alberto Costa Obregn (LyJ); and candidates of two parties that had participated in elections for over a decade: Rolando Morales Anaya (PS ) and Nicols Valdivia Almanza (CONDEPA) For a comprehensive account of the rise of the anti system movements, see Van Cott (2003). 97 After the events of 2000, there were some isolat ed calls for a Constituent Assembly. However most parties agreed in reforming the Constitution not from a clean slate process but based on the existent procedures that required three Presidential periods. During the ADN administration, Congress passed a la w authorizing a Constitutioal reform in the next presidential period.

PAGE 155

155 the division between th e establishment parties; the systemic parties (MNR, ADN and MIR); 98 and the anti systemic parties (MAS and MIP), with other parties combined elements of the past, because they had previously formed coalitions (UCS, CONDEPA and NFR) and repudiated the issues championed by their former allies in an odd in between position. However, as shown in Figure 4 3, during most of the campaign pre election polls, public opinion focused on SDL and Reyes Villa; the latter was ahead in the polls during the last three months of the campaign. Platforms of all parties except MNR and ADN promised revisions to the state role as a supervisor over capitalized and privatized companies. The MAS and MIP platforms were more radical, as they promised re nationalization of those compani es. The poverty relief, job creation, end of corruption and social discrimination. For example, He avoided confrontations during most of the campaign and used effective political general and vague. Along with the MAS and MIP candidates, NFR had an anti systemic discourse, it was against the establishment, opposing the way economic policy was handled by systemic parties but not opposing neoliberalism as the path to follow. 99 Calls 98 From the start of the campaign, the polls showed the wearing out of the party in government, forecasting a poor electoral performance for ADN at both national and local levels (IPSOS A poyo, 2001 2002). 99 Manfred Reyes Villa was the wild card candidate. The NFR was a personalistic party, with origins in local politics. Reyes Villa was an ADN partisan until 1993, resigning from ADN not for ideological reasons but to form his own party to respond to no one but himself. He successfully ran as major for Cochabamba. During his administration his political stances were not anti systemic. He favored technocratic decision making, seeking efficiency in the municipality administration. He signed, a long with Banzer, the privatization of the water company adopted an anti systemic stance. The NFR played the roles of both the anti systemic party from the rhetorical perspective and the systemic party, given the political history and the policies implemented at the local level by its leader.

PAGE 156

156 for a constituent assembly were part of the campaign platforms of both the NFR and M AS (Singer 2004). Paz Zamora (MIR) led a national negative campaign which blamed SDL for the unachieved economic prosperity and for selling the country to foreign s administration (in which MIR was its most important ally) were his own: promise of a constituent assembly, nationalization of hydrocarbons, and greater social inclusion. At the local level, the MIR was the party with a strategy to raise the profile of it s and unwavering support and resources from powerful coca growers unions. He did not have a clear plan for Bolivia, but he was the most vocal repudiator of neoliberalism. interests in the coca eradication policy and with those of transnational corporations. imperialist rhetoric was radical and nationalistic, an d it displayed racist elements. It sought to ignite the marginalized Bolivians, those who had little access to a capitalist economy, and the indigenous majority (60 % of the population). wn actions, 100 His candidacy appeared to have no chance for success despite various attempts to improve his image. Private polls demonstrated that, regardless of the hopeful messag es his 100 Especially demonizing were those by the MIR which consistently accused Snchez de Lozada of being the ngo who sold the country out to foreigners

PAGE 157

157 2007). For his presidential bid SDL counted on world renowned consultants, 101 and a popular running mate, 102 not to mention his personal fortune. 103 As shown in Figure 4 3, in the last months of the campaign Reyes Villa was first, with SDL and Paz Zamora in a dead heat for second place. Negative campaigning was brutal during the last weeks, and the top three candidates attacked each other with all sorts of arguments. In an un expected turn of events, just ten days before the election the comments of the U.S. ambassador changed the political scenario in a way that the polls were not able to fully capture. The U.S. ambassador threatened to cut off aid to Bolivia if Morales was el ected. His comments backfired and made possible the rise of Morales, who took most of the votes from Reyes Villa (Mesa 2007, Van Cott, 2003; Mayorga, 2003). As shown in Table 4 6, SDL was first with 22.46 % of the vote, 104 Morales was the unexpected se cond with 20.94 % followed by Reyes Villa with 20.91 % and Paz Zamora with 16.32 % 105 O nly 0.03 points below Morales, Reyes Villa alleged voter fraud and discredited the work of the National Electoral Court (CNE). However, by all standard s, national and international, the elections were considered free and fair. 106 Since no candidate achieved more than 50 % of the vote, the election between the top two 101 Greenberg, Quinlan and Rosner was the political campaigning company that helped Bill Clinton, Tony Blair, Ehud Barak and Nelson Mandela among others. Mesa (2007) argues that d espite the wrong idea that the images Rachel Boynton presents in Our Brand is Crisis Bolivian, not American. 102 Carlos Mesa was regarded as the most respected and influential journalist in Bol ivia at the time. He was image. 103 SDL was the candidate with most practical experience in managing a steadily growing economy. He showed proven capacity to resolve crises, knowledge of the state, and he had an established national political party. 104 For a complete analysis of the 2002 election from an institutionalist perspective, see Mayorga (2003). He argues that the reason why Snchez de Lozad a was able to come first was not due to his campaign or Snchez de Lozada as the candidate, but to the organizational strength of the MNR. 105 ADN di m inished its support dramatically with 3.40% of the vote, UCS 5.51%, MIP 6.09% and CONDEPA 0.37%. 106 See OEA Informe Final (2002)

PAGE 158

158 candidates rested in Congress. As shown in Table 4 4, MNR had 36 out of 130 deputy s eats and 11 out of 27 senate seats, while MIR had 26 deputy seats and 5 senate seats, and UCS had 5 deputy seats. T he non systemic parties (MAS, MIP, and PS) garnered 34 seats in the lower chamber and 10 seats in the Senate. As shown in Table 4 5, by 2002 systemic parties had the support of 44.90 % of voters while the two anti systemic parties had 55.10 % making it clear that anti systemic tendencies outweighed the political system in place. 107 Indeed, the non systemic parties held their greatest compounding challenges to governability and making evident the diminishing support for the establishment Desperate for a reliable post election ally, SDL and his political operatives engaged in an ext raordinary array of political chicanery and arm twisting to install him as President. This process took place not privileging agenda consensus, but via door meetings. After the unexpected election res ults, for the first time since 1985, the three dominant parties, that had competed against each other (MNR, MIR, and ADN), confronted and formed coalitions in order to prevent the election of the anti systemic candidate. Snchez de Lozada became President by forming a coalition with MIR and UCS, and he received the votes of ADN, although the latter party did not to participate in the administration. 108 The refusal by the two other major vote winning parties, NFR and MAS, to form a pact with the MNR gave MIR a strong hand in negotiating a power sharing deal. Having been the traditional political rivals, the post election coalition MNR MIR 109 was an odd 107 For a comprehensive analysis of systemic and anti systemic parties in Bolivia, see (Mayorga 2003) 108 ADN 109 Mesa (2008) affirms that the alliance with MIR was forged under the pressure of the U.S. ambassador. The c oalition involved MNR, MIR plus minor partners, UCS and MBL (in a pre electoral pact). Although ADN was not

PAGE 159

159 combination. 110 However, ideologically both parties were in the center of the political spectrum, and the differenc es were more in emphasis than in content. While the MNR promoted market oriented policies, the MIR advocated for a greater role of the state in the economy within a market orientation. The other coalition partner, UCS was a passive associate of the last tw o administrations and exhibited great ideological flexibility. Its support depended on the access it had to patronage opportunities. 111 At the outset, SDL knew his administration was handicapped, given his lack of two thirds of Congressional support. Moreove r, SDL's authority originated mainly in political party dealings. His legitimacy was fragile, with less than a quarter of the vote and a mere 44.29 % among the three coalition parties. He had a weak political base as an affiliated leader in a vulnera ble political order and turning his poor electoral performance into a mandate for government was a monumental task. To have a two thirds majority in Congress, it would have made sense to include NFR in the coalition, given its political stances and the fac t that it was part of the contribute to make alliances easy, nor did oor bargaining skills and in the coalition it supported the administration and often voted with the government. In an August 2002 poll, t he alliance MNR MIR was perceived as negative by 55% of those interviewed and 39% positive (IPSOS Apoyo 2002). 110 MI R had supported the election of Paz Estenssoro in 1985, but it was limited to the election of the President, and MIR was not part of the governing coalition. 111 CONDEPA and UCS, that once seemed to represent the frustration and promised economic inclusion, were coopted when they formed alliances in 1993 and 1997 (Mayorga 2002). The 2002 elections marked the end of that type of party politics. Moreover, ADN, CONDEPA and UCS imploded after the deaths of their founders, whose absences left the parties with mini mal internal institutionalization, commensurate with the nature of the parties. Furthermore, the implosion left no doubt, particularly in the last two cases, that the parties were electoral machines functioning as vehicles for patronage. Added to this wer e the internal divisions that weakened the parties, eventually causing them to lose public support.

PAGE 160

160 next to a radical left opposition. At first, SDL assumed he would have a honeymoon period during which he sought to implement his leadership projec t quickly and forcefully, as he had done at the start of his first term. He displayed his order shattering impulse by reorganizing the executive to have an organizational structure. Three new ministries were created: Hydrocarbons and Energy, Financial Serv ices, and Municipal Government. A novelty in the administration was the anticorruption role SDL assigned to the office of the Vice corruption and impunity. 112 However, SDL sp ent too much time making appointments and distributing posts, which were fiercely disputed among coalition parties, family members and his own entourage, thus highlighting the dismissal of members of the MNR as well as the spread of cronyism. 113 MIR had one third of the government posts and a strong presence in the cabinet, holding key ministries, 114 and four prefectures. 115 In the months that followed, the SLD administration slid into a deep state of incompetence, while opposition parties rushed to fill the void with accusations, and continued criticism over the President's leadership project. Snchez de Lozada proceeded to set up commissions to negotiate with the opposition on three sensitive 112 As in the previous administration, the role of the vice president was salient, given the personality and influence of the man in the post. The Bolivian Co nstitution did not assign a particularly important role to the Vice presidency besides acting as President when he is not in the country or assuming the Presidency when the President can no longer govern. 113 As in his previous administration, Snchez de Lo example: his brother, who in the previous administration was National Comptroller, became senator and chair of an important senate committee; his daughter was congresswoman and head of the deputies r epresenting La Paz. Her father in in law was a personal adviser to the President. 114 See Appendix Cabinet member. 115 See Arequipa (2010).

PAGE 161

161 issues which also were his priorities; first, economic restructuring a nd reactivation, along with social policies; second, coca eradication; and third, Constitutional reform. However, as shown in Figure 4 1, SDL had no honeymoon period. His approval ratings were already negative by the end of his first month in office, and h approval ratings were positive for only two months, as shown in Figure 4 4. Snchez de Lozada faced other major challenges. After four years of lean economic growth, there was a crippling shortfall of revenue and slow economic dynamic. Boli via was running under a growing deficit. Citizens were eager to see short term outlook in the region, the immediate alleviation of poverty was necessary but extremely di fficult to attain. While the structural adjustment and reforms of the previous seventeen years provided long term sustainable growth, it was lean. In the short term, Further more, there was a perception that the parties in the coalition became increasingly centralized, corrupt and out of touch with the needs of the country, bringing Bolivia to a state of unacceptable inequality (Lazarte 2000, Seligson 2001, Mansilla, 2002). Wh ile the policies of SDL in his first administration distributed political power and economic resources at the local levels, the coalition he formed in his second administration was yet another example of the political elite that had dominated politics at t he national level since 1985. Indeed, Popular Participation, and Constitutional Reform delivered democratic gains at the local level, but they also created unanticipated

PAGE 162

162 challenges for the MNR, particularly the weakening of its traditional sources of natio nal control over regional and local officials. 116 In his first administration, SDL addressed the deepening of neoliberal economic policies to strengthen the economy simultaneously with, or even prior, to the implementation of full decentralization (both regi onal and local). With only an ill equipped state, SDL sought to shrink the state, decentralize, and empower local politics in a context of globalization. This political strategy proved highly unsuccessful in the setting up of national democratic institutio ns. It meant that both institutions and agents were shaped by the process. As politics developed, the problems of the past were not resolved. SDL pursued his leadership project reproducing neoliberalism without it. He took neoliberalism to a new level and subordinated the state, within the existing parties but not with society at large. In this context, the economically dominant class affiliated with the state or benefiting from liberalization gained political ce ntrality, while other segments of society were left to deal administration recasted relations between the political center and periphery in a way that some of the strong est challenges to his authority in his second presidency originated locally. That the democratic institutions in Bolivia were so strongly disconnected from the state had far reaching implications for the future. On the one hand, the early expansion 116 Decentralization is likely to occur when regional par ties are strong and the national party depends on them (Willis et al., 1999). To a certain extent, that was the MNR situation in the mid 1990s, when regional parties became still depended on national was a desirable strategy for MNR for its long term horizons because the subnational level was more secure than the

PAGE 163

163 of po pular participation locally meant that it was at odds with neoliberalism, which assumed that the issue of the nation state was resolved. On the other hand, the fact that popular participation at the local level was conceded from the state at an early stage meant that the relationship between local politics and state politics was constituted from above. 117 The state appeared as an instrument of the dominant classes, instead of as the object of institutional alliances and compromises of all sectors of society. Despite all of this, decentralization was positive for local politics. The demands for political participation independent of centralized decision making were not addressed at the moment, as the decentralization process maintained regional leadership under the power of national politics. When the newly discovered natural gas emerged, the resistance to centralized power became extremely powerful. However, the challenges to centralized decision making did not come from the regions but from the recently empowe red local leaders. 118 These demands for participation in policy making went beyond the limits of the existing neoliberal order and included opposition to neoliberalism by those not benefiting from foreign investment and corruption of the state. The nature of these demands was in many ways similar to those advocated by UCS and CONDEPA in the late 1980s and 1990s. However, as those parties were co opted, very different political forces emerged in the early 2000s. The Constitutional Reform did not truly incorpor ate or represent indigenous demands. In Bolivia, the process of enlargement of the political system was conducted from the state and 117 Decentralization and popular participation were controlled processes that did not risk central authority. For ointed and not elected authorities that depended on the President. 118 Morales became nationally known when he became congressman from a congressional district in Cochabamba in 1997. Quispe was elected local authority in the La Paz Altiplano after 1997, than ks to the enactment of Popular Participation and the elections of majors. Quispe merged local leadership with peasant union leadership.

PAGE 164

164 disconnected from society. Their evolving processes developed separately to the point that it was no longer possible to mai ntain the existing political arrangements to satisfy disenchanted citizens. In this regard, the SDL administrations became a case of late modernization with weak institutionalization. The social and political movements that arose during the ADN administra tion demonstrated that protesters would not easily let those interests prevail. Citizens were wary of governmental institutions and were tempted by populist calls, as demonstrated by the unexpected election results. As in his first administration, 119 riority in his second administration became economic growth as the precondition for jobs and economic dynamism. Committed as he was to economic neoliberal policies in his first administration, in his second presidency, SDL proceeded to implement policies t o dynamize the economy. Moreover, with the positive experience of his previous immediate objectives aimed to achieve efficiency, not equity. However, equity as a developmental obj ective was necessary in order to lessen the sense of unfairness that undermined the legitimacy of these policies. 120 Like Siles and other counterparts in political time with disjunctive presidencies, was so fragile that it fell apart as he tried to assert his authority. Disjunction was the result of changes in the existing 119 and distribution of growth. Citizens became doubtful that the so called necessary austerity policies were good in the long run, more so when they perceived that both capitalization and nor privatization were transparent processes. These efforts were exacerbate earlier reforms and other policies, as described earlier. 120 In his assessment of the impact of the Washington Consensus in Latin America, Birdsal et al. (2008) considers not a ddressing equity as a developmental goal to be a failure.

PAGE 165

165 way it is important to look at politica l and secular change as part of the same reconstruction. The case is not new in itself; it is the outcome of superimposition of cyclical crises, and with them of political and economic transformations. The onset of the anti system social movement already u nder ADN, did not help SDL resolve his legitimation problem. In fact, he was seen as the problem. Upon taking office in his second presidency, SDL called for a 90 day truce to roll out his Plan Bolivia. The truce expired on November 6th, and frailly remain ed in place until February 2003, when it broke down. The IMF had a poverty reduction and growth facility agreement with Bolivia. However, in order to renew the agreements, the new administration had to reduce the deficit. As shown in Table 4 2, the ADN ad ministration held the worst deficit on record since the return to democratic politics, particularly the last two years with 6.82 % and 8.46 % respectively. The only way to reduce the deficit was via spending cuts, given the impossibility for Bolivians to pay higher taxes when they were hardly surviving in a depressed economy. As shown in Table 4 3, by 2002 GDP growth per capita was the November 2002, SDL traveled to the U.S. for financial help, but his visit with President George Busch did not result in getting American aid or loans. Instead, Bush reminded him that the U. S. policy towards eradication was inflexible and that the possibility to extend a trade preference agreement to Bolivia depended on continuing with coca eradication.

PAGE 166

166 On the domestic front, social policies tested the ability of the coalition to gain votes f rom the opposition. As part of his order affirming efforts, SDL tried to recover of his allies, he asserted power amidst conspiracies of his own cabinet members, ma ny of whom received instructions directly from other party leaders with their own agendas. With the support of NFR congressmen, SDL was able to reinstall BONOSOL in November 2002. Another social policy that barely passed was a health care program for mothe rs and infants (SUMI Seguro Universal Materno Infantil). The NFR proved to be more flexible than the other two parties in the opposition, and for this reason it was accused of having joined the coalition. Just as there were divisions in the governing coal ition, the opposition was also divided. Continuing the work of previous administrations, and confirming his affiliation with established commitments, SDL maintained a belligerent policy to eradicate coca. As a response, inside and outside of Congress, Mora les (MAS) led a strong opposition, encouraging and reinforcing the already existing pressures in a polarized society. Morales sought to channel growing frustration over socioeconomic conditions and corruption in traditional parties. As leader of the MAS, h e consistently obstructed not only coca eradication efforts, but all government policy initiatives in the legislature. 121 After the first 100 days of SDL II, a public opin ion poll captured two interesting views about the difficult political dynamics of the disjunctive order. With regards to SDL, 60 % 121 From August to December 2002, SDL and Evo Morales held five meetings trying to find common grounds. Not only did cultural and ideological differences become evident, but organizationally it was dif ficult to make binding deals. Slippery leaders of the MAS claimed and unclaimed capability to speak on behalf of the opposition, with the MAS functioning more as a social movement than as a political party. Morales was skillful in tying all government prop osals to the issue of coca eradication, leading attempts to reach consensus to dead ends.

PAGE 167

167 % ational approach, 56 % of the respondents said they did not like it, and 38 % liked it. There was no possibility of improvement in public opinion, given Apoyo 2002). On the other, citizens also held negative views of the opposition, which did not receive positive ratings either, as shown in Figure 4 5. As early as October 2002, the cond emned the behavior of all politicians (the President, the government and the opposition) and found no hope of seeing real change. In the face of a strong opposition led by MAS, the government suspended coca eradication in December of 2002 and announced a d elay in the Constitutional Reform. 122 In such precarious governance, would make a mistake difficult to reverse. This event happened in February 2003. The most important Constitutional Reform. The debate over constitutional reforms went beyond the framework established in the ADN administration. The outgoing Congress had passed a law authorizing Constitutional Re form, but the opposition advocated for the incorporation of a referendum on key issues because most of the political parties advocated for a revision of the capitalization law. The new situation required the President and his administration to compromise c ontinually with other actors, whether in Congress, with local and regional authorities, or with protesters. 122 Coca growers called for wider protests starting in January 2003 if the government did not agree to proposals to cato grown by each family living in the Chapare region.

PAGE 168

168 sustained economic reforms and yet tepid economic growth performance, again came to rest in its natural resources. As the capitalized corporations. 123 caused enormous outcry and a terrible sense of unease. 124 At the time, even after losing several issues to SDL, the opposition found a stronghold in YPFB (Campero, 1996). Ironically as a result of capitalization allowing investment in exploration, in the late 1990s and early 2000s it was discovered that Bolivia held vast reserves of nat ural gas. 125 In a country that was constantly reminded of its wealth in resources and yet remained one of the poorest in the hemisphere, YPFB became the promise for a better transferring control and co ownership to foreign investors. Bolivians were bitter then and reloaded their anger when SDL, only a few months into his second presidency, The SDL I I administration found markets for Bolivian gas in Mexico and the US, but a pipeline that connected Bolivia with a port needed to be constructed in order to export the gas, and because of their geographical proximity Peru and Chile were the only reasonable options. The administration advocated for building a pipeline to Chile, arguing that it was the most economically feasible option. A decision over this issue was supposed to be 123 The importance of YPFB was not only economic, but also historical. Bolivia went to war against Paraguay (Chaco War, 1932 1935) to defend its petroleum rich territory. Moreover, since its nationalization in 1937, the Bolivian state had two strategic corporations, COMIBOL and YPFB. Both companies made up more than 80% of the Bolivian state income up to the 1980s, but with systematic deficits and the collapse of the international tin prices, COMIBOL was clo sed. YPFB remained as a state owned service company for the hydrocarbon sector but lacked the required capital for exploration, exploitation and commercialization. By 1994 it was estimated that Bolivia would run out of reserves in ten years (Barja,1999). 124 The first calls for a referendum happened in 1996, when workers, the military, and civil society demanded areferendum in order to decide about the future of its most important source of energy and income. 125 Andersen and Faris (2003).

PAGE 169

169 made in November 2002, but due to difficult negotiations with the opposition o n other issues, it was delayed until April 2003. The opposition, and even the MIR in the coalition, promoted a referendum to allow the citizens to decide. The choice of port became a sensitive issue, as the opposition insisted on building a pipeline and an industrializing port in Peru, due to 1883 war with Chile. 126 Moreover, because of the long history of natural resource extraction by foreign companies with little benefit to Bolivians, the opposition pressed for a revision of the capitalization of the YPFB. By December 2002 the administration had lost three battles: it stopped coca eradication, delayed Constitutional Reform, and delayed the choice of port for the export of n administration in its order affirming efforts, as splits in the NFR provided the opportunity to gain the support of like minded NFR congressmen. Moreover, negotiations with the NFR leadership to join the coalition were opened. However, such negotiations were not welcomed by the MIR, as competition threatened to reduce its influence in the coalition. In addition to this, difficulties arose when a U.S. envoy successfully threatened to cut aid if coca eradication was not resumed. Protests and blockades by the coca growers in the Chapare region followed, and confrontations with anti drug forces proved to be deadly. 127 Besides the coca issue, animosity towards the U.S. among many Bolivians 126 The first public opinion poll that asked Bolivians about the preferred country port to export Bolivian gas was published when the ADN administration was coming to an end, and new issues were raised about the future of Bolivia and its newly found natural resources. Response s were; 40% preferred Peru, 10% Chile, and 35% did not care which country to export from (IPSOS Apoyo 2002). Although of no major consequence at the time, the poll provided evidence about the ambiguity of positions over an issue that became key in the col lapse of Gonzalo 127 Eleven people died in January 2003 (Informe Defensor del Pueblo, 2004).

PAGE 170

170 grew when it became public that an American company with interests in the Bolivian gas market advocated for construction of the gas pipeline through Chile. Morales and and requiring some kind of accountability. 128 Snchez de Lozada exercised his authority as if his mandate were broad, seeking to implement his leadership project in the same fashion he did in his first term. He imposed on his coalition to pass legislation a nd sought support from those opposition Congressmen willing to take an independent stand or to break with their parties. In February 2003, in its attempt to raise revenue to reduce the budget deficit, the government introduced a new income tax of 12.5 % on an already distressed population. Public sector workers, including health care workers, teachers and police, protested. With the police on strike and no law enforcement on the streets, violence exploded. The military intervened and SDL withdrew his tax policy, ordering the military to go back to their barracks. With the military on retreat and the police on strike, mobs and vandals attacked and looted public offices, businesses and political party offices. After 30 people died as a result of the viol ence, the government finally succumbed to police demands and order was restored. The press showed a confusing scenario, in which protesters, high school students, snipers, military officers, medical personnel and events almost brought the government down, and instead of taxing the lower end of the middle class, the administration taxed the oil a nd gas companies. After February 2003, 128 Pressure escalated as the opposition called for investigations involving minister of foreign relations, Carlos Saavedra (MI R) and President Snchez de Lozada himself, on corruption regarding privatization of mining companies.

PAGE 171

171 the administration seriously entertained conspiracy theories and accused opposition parties, MAS and NFR, of attempting to destabilize the democratic regime. 129 Although y helped to divert attention from government and the opposition, building consensus became extremely difficult. The opposition became stronger and called for indepen dent investigations of the events, since there was no credibility in the investigations by the police and military. 130 While the military responded to the call of the President to provide security, the administration raises while military salaries remained the same, causing even more animosity. In the following days some members of both the military and the police privately demanded more participation in the decision making processes. 131 Another consequence of the deadl decision to reduce the size of the executive in an attempt to be coherent with its austerity plan. The ministries were reduced from 18 to 13 and vice ministries from 38 to 20. There was also a reshuffle of the Cabinet, while still maintaining the balance of power between the coalition members. 132 Government critics, inside and outside the 129 Reyes was a former army captain who remained acrimonious after losing the election. SDL also claimed that there was a military plot to assassinate him. 130 The OAS published the preliminary c onclusions about the events of the February crisis in June. The police was held responsible for insubordination within its ranks, and therefore for the institutional failings. The military was cleared from accusations of attempting to kill Snchez de Lozad a, but it was acknowledged that his life had been put in danger. More investigations were recommended by the OAS. 131 Interview with Anonymous BOL#16. 132 zain, the crisis made him an unpopular figure. However SDL appointed him to another cabinet post, Minister of Defense.

PAGE 172

172 opposition, were dissatisfied with the changes, and they pushed for more changes in the selection of appointees and in economic policie s. 133 ratings. Vice president Mesa, who was one of the few government officials still popular fort to concerns. Mesa scored agreements with some opposition members, but despite his attempts to reach agreements with Morales, the coca leader remained uncompromising. The unexpected events of February allowed the administration to make a new and extended the stand by agreement. Fearing a popular backlash after the crisis in mid February, SDL agreed on making a decision on the port for gas export through some form of public consultation, although he failed to specify how. He was reluctant to have a referendum or plebiscite. In his opinion, representative democracy should not inclu de direct democratic mechanisms, because those who frame the questions have the capacity to manipulate the issues. In addition, tendencies, he considered it necessary to keep decision making centralized in national i ns titutions. 134 However, given his damaged reputation, this was perceived as an attempt to protect interests and keep decision making under his control. The opposition parties MAS, MIP and NFR called for early elections as public confidence in the President an d his government kept declining. Opinion polls showed an increasing number of Bolivians frustrated by the lack of progress in socio economic conditions. 133 For a complete account of the February events, see Report of the Ombudsman (2004: 20). 134 Personal interview with President Gonzalo Snchez de Lozada.

PAGE 173

173 Citizens believed that the government was more responsive to the IMF than to Bolivians, and they also b elieved that the administration was likely to enact more adjustment policies (IPSOS Apoyo, April 2003). Time eroded the government when there were no positive deliveries to the population. As time went by, neither SDL nor the opposition, represented by Mor ales and Quispe, were willing to concede. For SDL negotiating was synonym of convincing (Mesa 2008), he and his negotiators lacked the credibility to make people think that a step back taken by the administration was permanent. With regards to the coalitio n, the February events caused the MIR leader, Paz Zamora, to distance himself from the government, thereby complicating the already attention from brokering a better re lationship with the opposition in Congress and from engaging with protesters. 135 In mid March the government released a study led by a U.S. company, which recommended building a port in Patillos in Chile as the least expensive route. The idea that Chile mig ht benefit from the sale of Bolivian gas inflamed the already sensitive nationalist sentiments. Morales capitalized on this situation and declared that the gas reserves should be kept in the ground before benefiting Chile. Furthermore, Morales accused the administration of planning to sell gas to Chile through Argentina, convincing dissatisfied Bolivians. The controversy escalated with a series of strikes and blockades which paralyzed the country. The turmoil was such that SDL had to speak on 135 SDL spent plenty of time and effort in resolving conflicts between coalition members and in attempting to create and to maint ain some sort of cohesive government line on policy. The MIR complained that the president and his party acted independently, and without proper consultation. The MNR believed that constant bombardment of criticism from the MIR was detrimental to further g

PAGE 174

174 national telev ision explaining that there was no plan to sell gas to Chile. Lacking credibility, Bolivians remained skeptical about the words of the President. After the February events, SDL lost control of his actions and did not regain control over their meaning, the reby adding to the political order breakdown. As a disjunctive President, he was far more powerful than Hernn Siles, his counterpart in political time. For most of his presidency, Siles found himself with no party or supporters, but he maintained the pers onal course he set for his administration. On the contrary, despite Snchez de Lozadas disapproval in public opinion, he still counted on the support of his structured and strong party, with the shaky support of members of his coalition and the military, all of whom allowed him to move forward strongly and steadily. Furthermore, he did not have relentless media coverage attacking him. In the context of a general slowdown in economic activity, a pressing fiscal deficit, a refusal by external creditors and f riend countries to provide SDL with money, there was nothing he could show as accomplishment, nor did he have with money to distribute. In terms of the state as a mediator between markets and society, the capitalization of public companies in his previous administration weakened the image of the state as a legitimate institution. It was perceived that traditional politicians and a small group of Bolivians had benefited greatly from the capitalization transaction, while leaving the majority out. The state o mediators, and eventually some agreements were reached. Evo Morales and the MAS, with the support of some N FR and MIP leaders, called off a hunger strike, asking in

PAGE 175

175 exchange that some proposed legislation sponsored by Morales pass in Congress. In an extraordinary session, Congress passed a MAS campaign pledge to indemnify the February victims of police brutalit y and a domestic workers law. The administration strengthened its position after fixing its relations with the military and police, and it showed a more accommodating behavior. It was able to pass other laws including budget, new tax code and bankruptcy la w, after it agreed on the appointment of several top public posts in the judicial branch, thereby benefiting both the administration and the opposition, particularly MAS. Public policies continued to be written by independent technical experts with little coalition members, and with no real participation from the rest of Congress. SDL thought inter party negotiations directly between party leaders were enough to pass legislation. The release of press investigations on details of undisclosed large expenditures from 1990 to 2002 to pay for security forces and government personnel added to the already damaged reputation of systemic parties and led to further attacks by MAS and MIP. The administration res ponded, not by promising to end these types of expenditures, but only to increase transparency. In other circumstances, these revelations would have been part of the political games. However the proposed changes seemed mainly cosmetic, when the growing sen se of dissatisfaction required at least the repudiation of those practices. In August of 2003, NFR joined the coalition to attain the desired two thirds of seats in Congress to enact legislation. The arrival of the NFR made coalition

PAGE 176

176 management more diffi cult, 136 resulting in the withdrawal of the UCS from the coalition. 137 Furthermore, rivalry and quarreling among the members of the coalition over control of a range of Congressional commissions and public institutions did not r did it guarantee any loyalty towards the President or the success of the administration. Although the minor coalition parties enjoyed the benefits of holding office, their own political interests prevailed. In September, the social pact with all parties collapsed. Negotiations over a broad range of issues reached a dead end when MAS refused to budge over its unrealistic demands to raise tax royalties on hydrocarbon production from 18 % to 50 % In addition, Quispe led a hunger strike over the arrest of an indigenous leader who went against state law by applying customary laws on rustlers. Even though this might not seem a major issue, it added an ethnic and cultural dimension to the conflict. It also served as an excuse to launch more protests given the refusal of the administration to 138 approved by civil society and political parties was rejected by MAS and MIP, resulting instead in more protests. A series of road bl ockades in rural highland areas followed, isolating La Paz from the rest of the country. Public sector workers and members of trade associations rallied to calls for an indefinite national strike, staging protests and hunger strikes of their own. Some orga nizations had specific grievances, but many did not, presenting the government with a wide range of demands, and tying them to the protests against the 136 The shuffling of the cabinet re distributed the 15 ministerial posts and added 2 more. Eeight went to the MNR, four to the MIR and three to the NFR with minimal upheaval and without any major policy concessions to the NFR. 137 Despite this, UCS continued to support the administration in Congress. 138 signif icantly different from the existing policy.

PAGE 177

177 issue of gas exports. Blockades and strikes continued in October, only this time they were more virulent as the issue of the choice of port became more salient. Protests were led by MAS, MIP, unions, peasants, and miners, as well as by students. Opposition and protesters took the issue further by calling for radical actions that included nationalization of hydrocarbons, direct government intervention in the economy and a better distribution of income. Snchez de Lozada initially refrained from suppressing protesters, wary of provoking them. Nevertheless, hundreds of protesters blocked the main connecting roa ds between La Paz and El Alto, effectively laying siege to La Paz, and SDL called the military to break the blockades and to restore law and order. As a result of the clashes, sixty people were killed; it was the bloodiest episode since the return to democ ratic politics. 139 High profile members of civil society joined the array of strikes, demanding an end to the confrontations. Snchez de Lozada was asked to resign by the opposition and protesters, and eventually members of his own coalition withdrew their s upport, including his own Vice president. 140 On the morning of October 17, after three weeks of uninterrupted blockades, strikes and protests, Snchez de Lozada was forced to resign. On the same day, Vice President Carlos Mesa was sworn in as the new Preside nt, 141 Toward the end of his days in the presidency, SDL came to personify everything that was wrong with the country: he insisted on affirming an order that was no longer strong; his patch solutions became irrelevant to the problems of the day; he continue d 139 Ombudsman Office report (2004). 140 The MIR, however, supported the president until the end. 141 call ear ly elections, but after three months in office he announced he would serve out the rest of the presidential term. He confronted virulent blockades and strikes but was unwilling to use force to restore order. In early 2005 he resigned for the first time and then definitely on June 2005.

PAGE 178

178 the work of the past, without compromise, lacking the authority to affirm the integrity of the governmental commitments. In his second presidency SDL lacked credibility, and his ousting was seen as part of the solution to open the country to new possibil ities. Snchez de Lozada harvested an unforeseen type of participation that he could not accept. In his second term, SDL led a disjunctive presidency. The political order and the commitments with which he was affiliated with were both vulnerable. Even thou gh there were underlying structures that signaled the decline of the political order starting with the Banzer presidency, it was from the very outset of SDL II that the decay became clear. Moreover, the coalition of interests that SDL represented stopped b eing credible to most Bolivians. There was discontent with the economic model of development and the lack of economic and social progress. Snchez de Lozada served only 14 months of a five year term. His second presidency was a long succession of strategi c and tactical mistakes. The strategic order. The tactical mistakes were the momentous decisions he made at critical times. 142 The fact that SDL marked the nadir of the neoliberal political order was no reason 142 observed, all South American presidents who were forced from office lost legitimacy when security forces killed p rotesters. Furthermore, when Argentine and Brazilian presidents pressured SDL to step down, he realized that it boundaries. SDL chose to t ake refuge in the US, the country in which only months earlier he had warned that without its economic support he was likely to ask for refuge (See Lehman, 2006 and Sachs 2003).

PAGE 179

179 The offered solutions were not legitimate alternatives to the existing demands. The high levels of protest contributed to a sense that SDL had lost control of the political situation and was unable to govern. However it was more than just perception, as the high level of social contestation prevented the normal state of political and economic activities. 143 Such lack of governability, perceived and real, motivated protesters to challenge fice. Indeed, grievances and mobilization increased when organized interests of coca growers and radical leftist peasants under Evo Morales and Felipe Quispe articulated compelling arguments to remove the President. 144 Both leaders were repudiators of the ex isting arrangements and they found national leadership opportunities in the political vacuum created after the demise of Snchez de Lozada. The 2003 events were not the result of a crisis solely of economic origin. They signaled the end of neoliberalism as model of development, as a way to understand the relation between the state and society, as well as a crisis of the structure of authority. Discus sion The third wave of democratization in Bolivia occurred during the fall of the popular nationalistic orde r and the rise and fall of the neoliberal political order in Bolivia. This chapter provided an account of the challenges and advances of democratization as a result of the role of each of the successive presidents in the duration and the intensity of the l ives of the political cycles. In particular, this chapter looked at the two non consecutive presidencies of Gonzalo Snchez de Lozada in order to explain how his actions contributed to the rise and fall of the neoliberal order. 143 The highest level of vertical conflicts (street challenges) since 1996 took place during the Snchez de Lozada second administration (Leivstrendet, 2009). 144 From the start of the administration, Evo Morales said he would preside over a government not from the achieve his goals. See "El MAS Quiere Presidir Un Gobierno Desde Las Calles." La Razn, July 5, 2002.

PAGE 180

180 During these years the neo liberal order was championed by the MNR with the Paz Estenssoro and two SDL administrations. Paz Estenssoro was the reconstructive President who in 1985 started a new political order, leaving behind the statist and corporatist inheritances, and negotiating several formidable hurdles at once. The and Jorge Quiroga were articulative presidencies, which supported the governing ing the institutional arrangements that satisfied the ruling elite. At the outset of this chapter, it was suggested that SDL first and second presidencies represented an articulative and a disjunctive presidency, following Skoroneks second and third cate gories, respectively. His first presidency was articulative because he sought to reform from the previous administrations but not to reject their policies entirely. His second administration was a disjunctive presidency because he sought to reconfirm, ulti mately unsuccessfully, his previous term. The rejection of his presidency shows that his second term efforts were not successful. The case of Snchez de Lozada suggests that as first time President he had a unique opportunity for almost unconstrained lead ership, and he made risky choices by democratic power sharing and state building. This brought into question some of the basic tenets of the status quo by encouraging simultaneo usly both political decentralization and increased globalization, assuming that Bolivia was an established nation state. In his second term, he reassumed office with an established vision. He became more conservative as he defended the legacy of his first term, and tried to

PAGE 181

181 term President, Snchez de Lozada found himself out of touch with the processes in which Bolivians were engaged. His efforts failed to deepen democracy because social processe s unfolded faster than his understanding of the changing environment. He could not provide Taken together, Snchez de Lozadas two presidencies demonstrate that re e lected leaders are not necessarily beneficial for deepening democracy. On the contrary, they show that presidential leadership is not suitable for democracy when leaders fail to understand their own place in the political order in which their terms occur. Moreover, it shows that presidential actions can be turning points in history. However, as Anderson and Dodd (2009) remind us, democratic advancements and setbacks happen at specific moments in time or at specific levels or offices of government, without necessarily permeating all tiers or institutions. As the case of Bolivia shows, democratization became a force of its own. It advanced more in the polity, while it regressed at the level of national decision makers. Experienced presidents are not necessar ily beneficial for democracy, particularly after a significant length of time had passed between terms. While they might be re out of office may preclude them from retu rning to power in tune with the needs of the country and the evolving processes of democratization. Based on their past experiences, in their second terms their order affirming impulse takes precedence, and they ignore the fact that in their second term t hey are in a different position in the life of a political order.

PAGE 182

182 Table 4 1. Bolivia Presidents, types of presidencies and political orders (1982 2003) Years President Type of presidency Political order 1982 1985 Hernn Siles Disjunctive Popular nation alistic 1985 1989 Victor Paz Estenssoro Reconstructive Neoliberal 1989 1993 Jaime Paz Zamora Articulative Neoliberal 1993 1997 Gonzalo Snchez de Lozada Articulative Neoliberal 1997 2002 Hugo Banzer & Jorge Quiroga Articulative Neoliberal 2002 2003 G onzalo Snchez de Lozada Disjunctive Neoliberal Table 4 2 Bolivia Economic performance variables: economic activity, fiscal sector and inflation (in percentages) Year GDP growth Deficit/Superavit (of GDP) Public expenditure (of GDP) Inflation growth 1982 3.93 N/A N/A 32.05 1983 4.05 N/A N/A 123.54 1984 0.20 N/A N/A 275.24 1985 1.68 N/A N/A 1,281.37 1986 2.57 N/A N/A 11,748.80 1987 2.46 N/A N/A 276.35 1988 2.91 N/A N/A 14.58 1989 3.79 4.67 32.71 16.00 1990 4.64 4.80 34.03 15.17 1991 5.27 3.52 34.21 17.12 1992 1.65 4.85 36.51 21.44 1993 4.27 5.99 35.83 8.53 1994 4.67 2.99 36.45 7.88 1995 4.68 1.81 34.27 10.19 1996 4.36 1.94 32.38 12.43 1997 4.95 3.46 33.92 4.71 1998 5.03 4.65 35.95 7.67 1999 0.43 3.47 36.0 8 2.16 2000 2.51 3.74 37.43 4.60 2001 1.68 6.82 37.32 1.60 2002 2.49 8.46 36.17 0.92 2003 2.71 7.52 36.45 3.34 2004 4.17 5.54 33.00 4.44 Source: Economist Intelligence Unit

PAGE 183

183 Table 4 3 Bolivia Economic performance variables: population, emplo yment and income Year Population (millions) Formal unemployment (percent) GDP per capita ($US) GDP growth per capita 1982 5.60 N/A N/A 5.99 1983 5.72 N/A N/A 6.06 1984 5.84 N/A N/A 2.25 1985 5.97 N/A 1,091.40 3.82 1986 6.10 N/A 649.10 4.65 1987 6.23 N/A 697.90 0.32 1988 6.37 N/A 721.80 0.65 1989 6.52 N/A 723.30 1.40 1990 6.67 N/A 729.80 2.28 1991 6.83 N/A 782.30 2.80 1992 6.99 N/A 807.40 0.68 1993 7.15 N/A 802.10 1.94 1994 7.32 N/A 817.10 2.24 1995 7.48 3.60 897.80 2. 44 1996 7.65 3.80 966.90 2.04 1997 7.82 3.70 1,013.50 2.67 1998 7.98 4.20 1,064.80 2.92 1999 8.15 7.20 1,016.60 1.67 2000 8.32 7.40 1,009.40 0.41 2001 8.49 6.40 958.90 0.35 2002 8.66 6.70 912.90 0.47 2003 8.84 7.20 914.30 0.62 2004 9.01 7.00 973 .70 2.21 Source: Economist Intelligence Unit

PAGE 184

184 Table 4 4. Bolivia Seats by party ( 1980 2002 ) 1980 1985 1989 1993 1997 2002 Party Dep Sen Dep Sen Dep Sen Dep Sen Dep Sen Dep Sen MNR 1 34 10 43 16 40 9 52 17 26 5 36 11 MIR 15 1 33 8 25 6 2 6 5 ADN 25 5 41 10 38 8 33 11 4 1 UDP 2 47 10 AP 3 35 8 MRTKL 2 UCS 20 1 21 2 5 MNRI 8 MBL 7 4 PS 1 9 2 5 1 CONDEPA 9 2 13 1 17 3 MAS 27 8 NFR 25 2 MIP 6 PDC 3 FSB 3 3 MNRV 6 FPU 4 IU 10 4 EJE 1 ARBOL 1 ASD 1 Other 12 Source: Corte Nacional Electoral (CNE) 1 MNR and MRTKL run as the M NR MRTKL coalition in 1993 2 MNRH and MIR run as Union Democr tica Popular (UDP) in 1980 3 MIR and ADN run as Acuerdo Patri tico (AP) in 1993 Table 4 5. Bolivia Vote share by party blocks in general elections 1985 2002 (in percentages) 1985 1989 1993 19 97 2002 Presidential vote share of the MNR, ADN and MIR 73.37 72.71 56.61 57.23 42.18 Presidential vote share systemic parties 93.70 77.14 68.20 61.26 44.90 Presidential vote share of CONDEPA and UCS 12.25 28.05 33.27 5.88 Presidential vote share M AS and MIP 27.03 Presidential vote share anti systemic parties 6.30 22.11 31.80 39.21 55.10

PAGE 185

185 Table 4 6. Bolivia Vote share by party in presidential elections 1980 2006 (in percentages) Party 1980 1985 1989 1993 1997 2002 MNR 1 20.15 30.36 25.65 35.55 18.20 22.46 MIR 10.18 21.83 16.77 16.32 ADN 16.83 32.83 25.24 22.26 3.40 UDP 3 38.74 AP 2 21.05 MRTKL 2.11 1.62 UCS 13.77 16.11 5.51 MBL 5.36 3.09 CONDEPA 12.25 14.29 17.16 0.37 MAS 20.94 NFR 20.91 MNRI 5.48 IU 0.72 8.02 0.98 3.71 MIP 6.09 PLJ 2.72 PS 1 8.71 2.58 2.81 MNRV 4.80 1.28 FPU 2.53 Other 15.57 8.41 2.59 7.72 3.17 1.28 Source: Corte Nacional Electoral (CNE) 1 MNR and MRTKL run as the MNR MRTKL coalition in 199 3 2 MNRH and MIR run as Union Democrtica Popular (UDP) in 1980 3 MIR and ADN run as Acuerdo Patritico (AP) in 1993 Table 4 7. Bolivia Electoral data in presidential elections ( 1980 2002 ) Year Eligible voters EV Increase in EV Valid votes Blank Null To tal cast Absenteeism 1980 2,004,284 87 % 7 % 5 % 75 % 25 % 1985 2,108,458 5 % 87 % 7 % 6 % 82 % 18 % 1989 2,136,587 1 % 90 % 4 % 6 % 74 % 26 % 1993 2,399,197 11 % 95 % 2 % 3 % 72 % 28 % 1997 3,252,501 26 % 94 % 3 % 3 % 71 % 29 % 2002 4,155,055 22 % 93 % 4 % 3 % 72 % 28 % Source: Corte Nacional Electoral (CNE)

PAGE 186

186 Figure 4 1. Bolivia Presidential approval rating (2001 2003) Source: APOYO Opinin y Mercado Bolivia 2001 2003 Figure 4 2 Bolivia Vice presidential approval rating (2001 2003 ) Source: APOYO Opinin y Mercado Bolivia 2001 2003

PAGE 187

187 Figure 4 3 Bolivia Presidential campaign vote tracking (2001 2002) Source: APOYO Opinin y Mercado Bolivia 2001 2002 Figure 4 4. Bolivia Approval rating of government in general (2001 2 003) Source: APOYO Opinin y Mercado Bolivia 2001 2003

PAGE 188

188 Figure 4 5. Bolivia Approval rating of opposition (2001 2003) Source: APOYO Opinin y Mercado Bolivia 2001 2003

PAGE 189

189 CHAPTER 5 GONZALO S S LEADERSHIP STYLES As seen in Chap relevant constituencies, the demands of the times, and the nature of the relationship between leader and followers all move in concert then we have successful leadership (Winter, 1987). If it administration was a success, and his second administration a failure. While in the previous chapter context, in this chapter we move away from the structural patterns and focus on agency. As we defined earlier, presidential leadership is a calculated response based on individual assessment of the costs and benefits of presidential action at specific moments in time. Those assessments originate in two sources; one is the political reality of the day and the other is the lens through which presidents perceive political this chapter characterizes Gonzalo Snchez de Lozada presidential lea dership style. Hermann (2003) suggests that a particular leadership style adopted by a leader affects the way in which he makes decisions. As explained in Chapter 2 leadership style is best revealed when we look at three aspects of personality: 1) leader to act. Every President assumes office with a political project in mind. His pretensions are carried into the presidency infusing his tenure in office with political purpose. To the presidency leaders bring motivations, ideology, values and traditions.

PAGE 190

190 In order to explore these personality aspects in this chapter, as well as in chapters 7 and 9 this dissertation uses interviews conducted by the author with the presidents and with relevant actors, as well as media interviews, media reports, and relevant literature. 1 Although the profiling of the leadership style of S nchez de Lozada by no means constitutes a psychological study, it provides an understanding about why can shed light on when changes in decision making and interperson al interactions are likely, considering changes in the context and the nature of problems. About Gonzalo Snchez de Lozada Gonzalo Snchez de Lozada Snchez Bustamante was born in La Paz, Bolivia in 1930. He went to live in the U S at the age of one, whe re his father served as a Bolivian diplomat. After a few years, his family had to remain in the U S ., because there was a military coup in Bolivia and a democratically elected president was put out of power. His father became an exile and worked in the U S as a university professor. Gonzalo (known as Goni) grew up and received most of his education in the United States; including the University of Chicago where he stud ied Philosophy and English Literature at. 2 During his years in the U.S. he peridodically visited Bolivia. the U S as a university professor, and his family privileged position in Bolivia Goni 1 and with sixteen persons with whom Sn chez de Lozada had long term personal contact, including; family members, public office holders elected and appointed, journalists specialized in the Bolivian Presidency, and Bolivian scholars and analysts. Other sources are official speeches and decrees, public appearances, press interviews and special reports and a documentary. 2 Solz Rada contends that Snchez de Lozada never really graduated from college (2004: 99), as did a family finishing school. He is a college dropout, and he was never able to come to terms with that. Even though he is such an accomplished man, he felt he nishing high school, and then he returned to Bolivia after finishing classes but missing one last exam that he took (and passed) in Bolivia with an American teacher. He did not care to pick up his diploma until he sent his sister (when he was already presi dent elect in 1993) to get it at Chicago. (Personal interview with President Snchez de Lozada).

PAGE 191

191 enjoyed the advantages of education and social connections in both t he U S and in Bolivia. professional life started when he went to Argentina in the and worked as a movie producer. At the age of 21 he returned to Bolivia to work as a businessman, eventually becoming the successful owner of Bolivia's largest mining group. From 1965 1980 the S nchez de Lozada bothers, Gonzalo and Antonio, saw their fortunes grow as small and middle sized mining businesses bloomed and international tin prices reached a peak. Their Mining Company of the South (COMSUR Compaa Minera del Sur) founded in 1962 with participation of U S capital, was one of the most successful companies in Bolivia (Arze, 2002). In 1954 Snchez de Lozada became a member of the MNR. When the Banzer government was over, and starting in 1978 Snchez de Lozada became an active MNR political operative H e was involved in the highest levels of becoming a high profile politician since 1979 as part of the team that negotiated the transition from authoritarian rule. For the July 1979 elections, Snchez de Loz ada was a candidate, a fundraiser and finances manager for the MNR political campaign H e gained a seat as representative for Cochabamba but was not able to assume his representative role because the military took over. He was able to return to Congress i n October 1982, when the last military government transferred power to civilians. During Siles Zuazos administration, Snchez de Lozada became an active member at the Deputies Chamber. He organized a group of progressive minded businessman that supported Paz Estenssoro in the 1985 elections. He became senator for Cochabamba and the President of the National Senate in 1985. As such he led a group of experts that

PAGE 192

192 Plannin g and Coordination a post that allowed him to influence the national agenda and to negotiate legislation in Congress. In 1988 Snchez de Lozada became the MNR candidate for the presidency and the leader of the party after winning the primaries. Snchez d e Lozada married Ximena Iturralde Monje ( early 1960s ) ; they have two children Ignacio and Alejandra. Leadership Style Constraints events, but low in his need for power. Herman n argues that such leaders take charge of what happens, and they challenge directly or indirectly the constraints of the environment. But, often, she contends, they are not very successful in challenging the environment, because they tend to be too dir ect and open in their use of power. They are not good at reading how to manipulate people and in working smoothly out of the spotlight to have the desired influence. Leaders with these traits send signals to others without really meaning to. During both o f his presidencies, SDL was a leader who consistently challenged constraints as demonstrated in his political decisions. Even though he lost political support as a result of this he preferred to step into the unknown, as opposed to other types of leaders who are adaptable to the situation and remain open to respond to the demands of the constituency and circumstances. In SDL I the conditions were such that allowing him to fo cus on the implementation of his agenda. In SDL II, the political conditions were not favorable and most of his actions were attempts to maintain himself in power and to achieve governance.

PAGE 193

193 his control and influence over events The perception that presidents can influence what happens. Leaders strong in this trait are active in the policy making process as well as in the implementation phase. These leader s are less willing to compromise or to make deals with others. SDLs inclinations fall into what Wasserman (2009) calls being unusually, and sometimes excessively, confident as a leader. Leaders are convinced that, against the odds, they are able to turn t heir ideas into reality. This sometimes allows them to accomplish goals at which most people fail, but it also means they hardly ever hit the forecasts in their plans. According to Wasserman, this type of leader is strongly attached to his project. This mo tivates to give his all to the project, whether he keeps their popular support or not. But it can also be an Achilles heel. Once such leaders get started, t he y hate giving up control of the process in which the project evolves, even if they lose all. Henc e, they are also risk takers, and are bolder than their regular counterparts. him, and that luck and opportunity both affected his leadership, he also said that he felt he had a r modernize the country. His entrepreneurial experience, his personal economic success, as well as beliefs and will, enabled him to envision and create a series of proposals for politi cal reform. 3 3 He carried this piece of advice for years and wa s determined to become a successful businessman. After finding himself in a comfortable economic position, he engaged in public service. Being from a traditional and powerful family and having been exposed to progressive ideas from a young age, he took to heart another advice his father of change

PAGE 194

194 In his first presidency Snchez de Lozada believed he was in complete control of the political process. Indeed, as we saw in Chapter 4, the political moment was favorable for him. Having received 35.55% of the vote the highest percentage sin ce the return to democratic politics, he started his administration with a strong mandate, which allowed him to pick his coalition associates knowing that they would support his policies he formed a coalition that had the effective controlled of Congress H e was able to put forward a political project to modernize Bolivia that he was determined to accomplish from the very start. Snchez de Lozada has been described as someone who left e conducted 4 Knowing that he would seek the presidency for a second time after a fail ed attempt in 1989, he hired the same campaign strategy team that helped Bill Clinton win the presidency. I n 1990 Snchez de Lozada established the Millennium Foundation (Fundaci n Milenio), a private think tank intend ed to research, analyze, and propose policies to modernize Bolivia. Among the policies that this foundation produced and that were the basis of the laws passed during his first administration were : the Popular Participation (Participacin Popular), Education Reform (Reforma Educativa) Capit alization, 5 6 and one of the richest men in Bolivia, he did not hesitate to hire and s eek advice on how to use state of the art technologies, from running political campaigns to rewriting the 4 Interview with Anonymous BOL#2. 5 Interview with Anonymous BOL#6 6 Interview with Anonymous BOL#2.

PAGE 195

195 Constitution. 7 Having the will and the economic resources, he was confident that with the expertise and with the right tools, he and his administratio n could have great impact: In his second presidency, his belief in being in control proved to be lethal, as he was reticent to sof ten his position and allow citizens to make decisions through referendum. This time it was not about hiring the best people for the job, but about being credible and willing to compromise. Snchez de Lozada was not ready to abandon his technocratic concept ion of what was needed for Bolivia. His approach was deeply grounded in his previous experience, reinforced by an entrenched coalition, and underpinned by the intensity of his ties with multilateral organizations. When Snchez lenged by th e opposition and on the streets as king for referendum, he held on to the belief that it was undemocratic to let Bolivians decide about the production and distribution of the recently discovered hydrocarbons, the resources that allegedly would ta ke Bolivia out of poverty. He fiercely defended the capacity of the President to decide o n standing political arrangements, were not enough to sustain an approach that appeared to have less and less grounding in reality. Centrifugal forces gained strength month by month. Snchez de Lozada became more and more focused on his own problems while anti systemic forces increasingly found new partn ers, and determinedly pursued their own course. 7 Guillermo Bedregal, long ti me political rival, asserted that he lost the candidacy for the leadership of the party and for the presidency because he could not compete monetarily with Snchez de Lozada, one of the most powerful businessmen in Bolivia (Bedregal, 2010).

PAGE 196

196 The long awaited popular consultation, no matter how it was later announced could not o slow or reverse these trends. The need for power and influence is another trait tha t indicates whether a President will challenge or respect the constraints he perceives in the setting of his presidency. As described in Chapter 2, Hermann asserts that leaders high in the need for power are generally daring and charming, but they have lit tle real regard for those around them, or for people in general. In effect, other people and groups are viewed as followers to feel strong and responsible. They are willing to sacrifice their own interests for those of the group, since in their view, what is good for the group is good for themselves (Hermann 2003:190). Snchez de Lozada seemed to have relatively low to moderate need for power, he did not display an interest in personally appearing as a winner of arguments, nor did he try to test the limits of what could be done before adhering to a course of action out of pride. He has been depicted as an arrogant man, as someone extremely self assured and persevering, a passion ate man with a pragmatic spirit, a man who could be among several who have influence and have others taking credit for policies. His vanity was not reflected in a need to stand out, but he boasted about his capacity to pick the best team available. He empo wered others, enabling his technocratic team to feel strong and responsible, not only when making policies, but also when implementing them. His need for power was oriented toward challenging the status quo in order to implement his agenda. H e was not will ing to act timidly within the framework of what seemed possible.

PAGE 197

197 He was a visionary as an entrepreneur a nd he brought the same vision to politics; it was a vision that tested the limits of what was possible. Although some interviewees said Snchez de Loz others to adopt his ideas, it was his reasoning that was even more persuasive. Because of his background, money and accent, at the personal level Snchez de Lozada, was not someone an average Bolivian could relate to. Moreover he was described as 8 For most of the interviewees who know him well at the personal level, he did not feel the need to be liked in or der to have power and influence. In his view, the way to have power and influence did not rely on likability as a person but on economic status, and he was very aware of this. for power is best manifested in SDLI, by the path he did not take to seek re election; he did not try to change the constitution that would have allowed him the chance to remain in office. When the Law of Necessity for Constitutional reform was under discu ssion in 1992, Snchez de Lozada, who led the opposition, suggested that the application of changes in the Constitution would require three constitutional terms to be implemented: one term to propose changes, one term to ratify the legitimacy of the propos ed changes, and a third term to apply the changes. When the leader of the ADN, Hugo Banzer, insisted that the application of changes in the Constitution would require only two terms, Snchez de Lozada argued that Banzer did so because he wanted to be presi dent under the reformed Constitution. By the time the changes took place in 1994, then President Snchez de Lozada said he secretly 8 Interview wit h Anonymous BOL#2.

PAGE 198

198 received a proposal that would allow for him to run for reelection. 9 Paz Zamora, who at the time had problems with the U.S. E mbassy for his alleged ties with drug trafficking, let Snchez de Lozada know that he would support a proposal to allow immediate re election in exchange for being left alone. Such a change would have benefited Snchez de Lozada, but he refused to change t he rules in the middle of the game. I f I would consolidated the reforms I worked for, but I did not accept for ethical reasons, I could not change the constitution to benefit myself L ooking back I made a big mistake because my reforms were dismantled during the Banzer administration, and now we 10 There is no reason to believe that what Snchez de Lozada affirmed was false. He had not tried to cha nge the constitution during SDL I, when there was little opposition, since the main leaders including Banzer, had resigned. 11 Information openness to contextual information is based on the intensity of self confidence an d conceptual complexity. These are indications of making process, as well as the incentives they use with their advisers and other subordinates. Based on their levels of sel f confidence and conceptual complexity, leaders differ in their degree of openness to contextual information. 9 Personal interview with President Gonzalo Snchez de Lozada. 10 Personal interview with President Gonzalo Snchez de Lozada. 11 By December 1993, after losing the election to Snchez de Lozada and right before ADN headed toward a humili was withdrawn given allegations of having received support from drug dealers during his 1989 campaign. By March 1994, he resigned from politics. Tw o MIR ministers resigned with corruption scandals and a four year sentence was placed upon the head of the party Oscar Eid for having maintained links with drug traffickers. Other MIR party fellows were accused of strong ties with drug trafficking and reti red from politics.

PAGE 199

199 Even though Snchez de Lozada com e to office with a well established vision and agenda in both of his presidencies, perhaps the biggest differenc e between his first and second administration s was the different degrees of openness he displayed in each. In SDL I, he was more open to information than in the second. While in SDL I he was more willing to listen, but in SDL II he sought assurance. In SDL I, he had a coherent set of ideas during both of his presidencies. I n SDL I he had the legitimacy to implement those ideas, and he also had a good information strategy to explain the policies But in SDL II there was an absence of careful attention to th e process of legitimation itself, in particular to the precise relationship between ideas and practices, and he did not engage in an effective information strategy. In 1993 coalition making was a legitimate practice which SDL used to rally his reforms. However, in his second term coalition making grew stale as the coalition partners no longer enjoyed support. In SDL I, s rhetorical practices were technocratic; his explanations focused on the econo mic rationality of the policies and pointed to the ne ed to try something new, as the old practices were unbearable. The same emphasis on rationality was employed in SDL II, but this time people no longer believed in the rhetoric because corruption had paid its toll on the credibility of the political class. Moreover, economic growth was small and Bolivians ran out of patience waiting for the promises that the trickledown effect would reach them. The making of the Popular Participation law during his first term has been highly documented. 12 Those who particip apparent openness to hear ideas surrounded himself with the smartest and the top of line, he listened to them, and at the 12 Grindle (2000, 2003), Molina (1999), Milenio Fundation (1998).

PAGE 200

200 end he did what he really thoug ht was right; he was 13 Carlos Hugo Molina said regarding When he did not have in depth k nowledge of a particular theme, he asked questions and listened. His open and receptive attitude allowed him to gain much from the 14 In a similar fashion as Dwight Eisenh ower, the organizational leadership style of Snchez de Lozada was to bring all responsible policy makers together, listen to their different viewpoints and have them debate issues in front of him, thereby gaining a broad view of possibilities and subseque ntly deciding on the best course on his own. 15 Hermann (1994:78) describes the active independent leader as someone interested in discussing and innovating issues but on his own terms T his was the style that best descri bes Snchez de Lozada in SDL I. TE ve n though he was interested in learning about options different than his own, he was the ultimate decision maker, and he was involved in every aspect of policy making and was uncomfortable whenever he was not in charge. In contrast to his first presidency in SDL II, Snchez de Lozada surrounded was elected president was quite different from the first and did not allow him to have room for maneuverability. With a weak coa lition, he ended up with a divided cabinet that did not pledge any loyalty to him, nor did they necessarily share the goals of his 13 Interview with Anonymous BOL#7 14 Grindle (2000) p. 233. Goni was his family nick name, but it became his political name in an effort to portray him as someone familiar and closer to the average Bolivian. 15 For a discussion of the importance of debate in presidential advisor systems, see George (1972).

PAGE 201

201 administration. Even within ministries, there was party division by hierarchical level, making the implementation of policies extremely difficult, because each level served as a veto point for the others. With only thirteen of his own party and six independents amnt the 31 ap pointments in ministerial posts, Snchez de Lozada chose to value loyalty over other considerations. His inner circle was formed by two close dependable advisers: the two time minister Snchez Berzain and son in law Mauricio Balczar. They have been depicted in the press, as well as by several sources, as individuals with enormous ambitions, who tended to react instead of deliberate or reflect first. Moreover, they had vigilant attitudes and held similar views and readings on the social conflicts. Other levelheaded advisers and friends, such as Guillermo Justiniano and Fernando Illanes, were relegated to the issues of the ministries they led, and they views were not heeded particularly those who confronted the President and tried to tell him he was making poor decisions. Hermann (2003) asserts that leaders high in the conceptual complexity trait see things in shades of gray, compared to those with lower contextual complexity, who tend to see the world in black and white. As described in Chapt er 2, highly contextually complex leaders receive more stimuli from the environment than more assertive leaders. They are less willing to trust their instincts and are highly attuned to contextual information. it seemed to lean toward high in his first term and low in his second. For the development of public policies, in his first presidency he sought multiple opinions and assembled several groups that developed

PAGE 202

202 public policies and sponsored debates about them. He was more open to receive information and counterbalance views than in his second term, when he was more assertive. Snchez de Lozada has been described as a very intelligent man with a great capacity to bring historical facts to debate and to compare t hem with current events Several interviewees mentioned that he could critically engage in discussions with highly specialized experts, recalling names, opinions, and the context in which certain ideas were discussed. 16 Snchez de Lozada considered himself points of view, always being the leading character. 17 Using his vast knowledge of world and Bolivian history, current events, anecdotes, popular sayings proverbs and even jokes, Snchez de Lozada weighted reasons, propositions and postures, as long as these deliberations would help him enhance the ideas he already had in mind. This seems to be part of his style, as a person, a politician and a president, but it also reveals a complex mind. Moreover, he seemed to take pride in his abstract and non experiential knowledge of people. In his own words T here are two types of dialogs: with people and with books. One of the main problems of the politi cal class is that only few read. Dr. Paz is a man who reads, even now [at 92 years]; that is why he is so up to date. If you ask me what do you have to do to be a politician, I would answer that first you need to read, to educate yourself because knowledge is in th e books, and the truth is in discussion. 18 His deeds and disposition during his first presidency were convincing to many who followed him In the words of Mesa, 16 Various interviews. 17 Interview with Anonymous BOL#3 18 Molina (1999).

PAGE 203

203 I surrendered to his intelligence, his determination (a suicidal weapon during his second gove rnment), his creative capacity, his legislative spirit (which ended up being a liability in times of weakness and urgency), his innovative proposals that were daring and courageous, a leap toward modernity, not the liberal modernity: the INRA law, Popular Participation, bilingual education, BONOSOL. But from the inside, I learned about his pettiness and mistakes, and I understood that he ha d never stopped being a liberal 19 During SDL I, Snchez de Lozada advanced his program too far ahead of his time to be realistic, and he did not garner adequate public support from those affected by the policies. In SDL II, Snchez de Lozada displayed a different intensity in contextual complexity H e was low in this trait a nd never doubted that that he had pursued the ri ght path, the just course for Bolivia, even after the deathly events of February 2003. 20 By April 2003, he made it plain that he was a deeply disappointed and frustrated man H e was not ready to shake off the impediments the Presidency came to represent. L elf c onfidence Leaders whose self confidence is high interpret information according to their own sense of worth (Hermann, 2003). As described in Chapter 2, these leaders are fairly unresponsive or insensitive to cues from the environment. Inste ad they reinterpret the environment to fit their view of the world. These leaders are likely to organize the decision making process in a hierarchical manner to maintain control over the nature of the decision. (Hermann 2003:194 195) Snchez de Lozada was high in self confidence, and he displayed this feature in both presidencies. However, in SDLI he was more moderate than in SDL II. When it 19 Mesa (2008: 75) 20 In February 2003, protest ers threatened to besiege La Paz. With the police on strike, looting mobs and vandals the result was the death of more than thirty people

PAGE 204

204 came to envisioning the issues he wanted to put forward, he spent time learning about options available, thinking, cr eating strategies, deciding, planning, organizing and personally leading discussions with experts. His belief that his agenda needed to be followed with precision, that the course of action he proposed was the most doable, and that the experts he hired wer e the best worked well in his first administration, but not in his second. There was a sizable difference between the amount and quality of the information, as well as the way Snchez de Lozada garnered it, between his first and second presidencies. After his 1989 electoral defeat in Congress, Snchez de Lozada traveled through the regions of Bolivia. Between 1989 and 1993 he visited Bolivia traveling extensively mainly on the road. At first, the main goal was to build a strong he realized that he could build his party by ensuring support at the grassroots level, and that at the same time that he could learn about the needs and wants of Bolivians. He could do so by listening to those to whom he had not listened previously. Up to then, his knowledge and perception of the Bolivian voters originated in a top down perspective. His social position, and later his economic position, clearly revealed his adherence to the Bolivian elite. His ideas and attitudes were very influenced by his exposure to progressive people, 21 in his family and personal relations, as well as during his formative years in 21 Progressive people display spirit and enthusiasm for social activism and political reform, including reform of local government, public education, medicine, finance, insurance, industry, railroads, churches, and many other areas. They seem committed t o changing and reforming every aspect of the state, society and economy. They are believers in science, technology, expertise and especially education as the grand solution to society's weaknesses. Characteristics of progressives include a favorable attit ude toward modern society based on principles of solidarity, the belief in mankind's ability to improve the environment and conditions of life. It also includes belief in the obligation to intervene in economic and social affairs, as well as a belief in t he ability of experts and in efficiency of government intervention. They hold liberal views about the role of government spending programs, government programs, welfare state and redistribution of wealth.

PAGE 205

205 lands that my fami ly had in Cochabamba, where my father's family owned land. When land reform came along, we were not affected by it because we had become of Bolivia was very theoretical and was also based on his experience as businessman. 22 The eye opening experience of traveling throughout Bolivia or talking to people, as in preparation for the 1993 campaign, was not repeated for the 2002 campaign. For his last campaign Snchez de Lozad a traveled throughout Bolivia mainly by plane, and he made road trips only to targeted places as required by the campaign. Instead of traveling to gather information about the needs and wants of Bolivians, he traveled to spread a tailor made message to key voters in order to garner support. In his own words once the polls showed that I was garnering more support, I let myself be led by it [immediate campaign needs], I made a mistake, and I relied on it [campaign strategy] and did not realize that there wa did not spend time listening to voters for the 2002 campaign, he said made a big mistake. For the 2002 campaign, I was fully absorbed by politics ; I made a huge mistake by not going back to listen to people. 23 22 Roca affirms that when Snchez de Lozada returned Spanish, given that English was his native language and the one spoken regularly at home. Despite his profound and distinguished roots that made him biologically Bolivian, culturally and mentally h e was a foreigner, which is a characteristic that he has kept, given that it is not easy to turn around the spirit. He did not have a human referent that would relate in Bolivia. He did not have childhood friends, he did not put a foot on a school, or inst itute, or therefore intellectual, as any other foreigner that becomes citizen has, even if there is commitment to the country, he ignores how is 23 Personal interview with President Gonzalo Snchez de Lozada.

PAGE 206

206 Indeed, with his experience as a candidate, as a politician, and as former President he was self confident about h is knowledge of Bolivia. He failed to realize that politics and society were not static, and that during the Banzer/Quiroga administration profound changes took place in the conditions, needs, and the hearts and minds of Bolivians. He considered his bigges t mistake was: in my second administration I people, I would have figured it out, but I did of ideas and concepts matched th ideas through the use of technology. 24 Snchez de Lozada also said that one of the many things he regretted, and to which he attributed h is failure in SDL II, was his lack of distrust. He said he was very ingenuous and he did not realize that politicians with hidden agendas conspired against him and against the whole political system. 25 From the beginning of his second mandate his fixed ideas of what ought to be instead of what was possible, did not i nclude constitutional reform that involving referendum. In his view a referendum opened the door for direct democracy which he was against than plebiscite or referendum. That is what the authoritarians have used throughout history. Hitler used it; Pinochet used it; it is a manipulative instrument, it all depends on how the question is asked and how you persuade people to vote one way or another in 24 Personal interview with President Gonzalo Snchez de Lozada. 25 Personal interview with President Gonzalo Snchez de Lozada.

PAGE 207

207 26 He said that he was holding this view, the fact that he refused at all costs to even entertain al ternatives, to show willingness to listen to people, backfired on him. With thin legitimacy, with his refusal for dialog, the accusations of being nsensitive to people selling the country to foreigners wanting to accumulate power for himself a nd his clique truths, particularly since corruption charges and murkiness during the process of capitalization during his first administration were never properly investigated. confidence had negative implication for his leadership, not only because it precluded him from listening, but also because the events that unfolded during the last months of his administration made him entrench even more in his views. He has been described as a stubborn man, often so obstinate t hat he would not entertain answers other than the ones he already thought on his own. Two descriptions illustrate that this trait that had both positive and negative implications for his decision making. The first description was given by his party rival G uillermo Bedregal: there was an almost scholastic obstinacy well rooted in technical and Gonzalo Snchez de Lozada is his stubbornness and his enormous capability to find arguments that compensate for his tremendous political defect [not seeming Bolivian] Added to this is his arrogance and pride, which are not what people think they are; these are part of his complex personality. Many party fellows and close friends of Goni understood t he obstinacy (Bedregal 2010: 820). 26 Personal i nterview with President Gonzalo Snchez de Lozada.

PAGE 208

208 The second was offered by former Vice President during his second term and successor in the presidency, Carlos Mesa. Recalling a conversation that he held with the president five days before his ousting, 27 at a time when most peo ple did not dare to speak to SDL, and when those who did found themselves unable to lay down their arguments, Snchez de Lozada was not willing to listen when he was told he err ed or if he did not like the position. To Mesa: [Snchez de Lozada] is pigheaded; he is the biggest pighead I have known. He is a tremendous manipulator, willing to guide the interlocutor through the intellectual path if necessary, followed by a long and p atient reasoning, using the same instruments of Cartesian logic. That is how the more circles, concentric circles that ended up in labyrinths that would inexorably end up in his terrai n. The arbitrariness and discretion that once were the most powerful weapons to change the country, despite the odds, became [during the second presidency] an endless swamp that condemned us all to the terrible outcome of October 17th. 28 Motivation Hermann (1998, 2001, and 2003) contends that leaders are driven in general by either of two factors: i internal focus, in which the drives are: ideas, images, causes or a particular problem, or by the desire to g ain feedback as a way to be accepted, get approval, obtain support, and for seek acclaim. is described as the ultimate political animal, whose goal was power for the sake of power, Gonzalo Snchez de Lozada was the ultimate businessman who turned to pol itics not because it was part of his essence but because his conviction told him it was the right thing to do. He was 27 Snchez de Lozada sent his resignation to Congress from Santa Cruz on October 17, 2003, right before taking a commercial plane with his family to the United States, where he was living at the time of the writing of this research. He remained living in Washington, DC, and did not return to Bolivia. He has been accused of several crimes and corruption. He did not face Bolivian justice courts, since he alleged he would not receive a fair trial, given the con ditions of the judicial system in Bolivia and the witch hunt the Morales government held. 28 Mesa (2008:71).

PAGE 209

209 driven by an internal focus, believing that Bolivia could and should become a modern country. His quest was to implement policies that w ould modernize Bolivia according to his own vision of modernity, which had been heavily influenced by his exposure to progressive people within his own family 29 and in his formative years in the US. 30 Because of his background, his progressive vision, his U.S. connections and his accent, image was one of a foreigner, an outsider who could not connect with the average Bolivian and who seemed too distant to fully understand the needs of his people. Recalling the Snchez de Lozada he met in the 1980s, Mes Furthermore, Mesa considered him a politician with a different style than the conventional, a different personality and new outlook to tackle problems Snchez de 31 Snchez de of who he was and whether or not he fit in was not a concern. 29 Snchez de Lozada said that his family was always identified with progressives in Bolivia. His grandfather, Daniel Snchez Bustamante, was a pion eer of the educational system in Bolivia involving holistic approaches to education in the humanities and technical skills. His father, Enrique Snchez de Lozada, was member of the Leftist Revolutionary Party (PIR Partido de Izquierda Revolucionario) and was considered an avant garde man in politics. His mother, Carmen Snchez Bustamante was a feminist and an advocate for social reform of conviction. Snchez ll as being friends with intellectuals like Leon Trotsky, Max Lerner (liberal) and Frederick Schuman (outspoken liberal and suspected communist) at Williams College. (Personal interview with President Gonzalo Snchez de Lozada) 30 As the son of a Bolivian d iplomat, exiled and intellectual, Gonzalo Snchez de Lozada Snchez Bustamante lived with his family in Washington DC and then Boston and Williamstown Massachusetts, where his father taught at Harvard University. His father became an outspoken proponent of Policy and an associate of Nelson Rockefeller (Guthrie, 2009). When he was 10 years old, he was sent to Scattergood Friends School for Junior High,a Quaker school in Iowa. His parents were admirers of the Quake ideas of responsibility, meaningful work, including working on the farm, discipline, and work ethic. Snchez de Lozada studied Philosophy and English Literature at the University of Chicago, which at the time was regarded as one of the foremost progres sive universities in the US. (Personal interview with President Gonzalo Snchez de Lozada). 31 Mesa (2008:34).

PAGE 210

210 n problem solving vs. focus on r elationships Snchez de Lozada had high interest in achievement as opposed to concern with the feelings and sensitivities of others. Because his focus was on problems instead of on relationships, his need for approval or su pport was not high. Those who know Snchez de Lozada well at the personal level assure that his beliefs and respect for rules of conduct were reinforced by his personal experience with the Anglo Saxon 32 When he talked about his approach to political problems, he emphasized substance over approval; he was focused on issues rather than personalities: One never knows [one has found the truth]. The only thing one can be sure of is that yo u will never find the truth, but one has to seek it. People always argue what is feasible I nstead I ask: what is it that should be, not what could be. If one looks at what could be and not what should be, there is no objective to look for; one does not ad government ended up being different than what I sent to Congress, not because we negotiated nor because we looked for consensus, but because we sought the truth. Many times we changed things to make them better, to enrich them, yet it did not always happen. I had to negotiate; but, in general only seeking the truth is conducive to making something acceptable. 33 Degree of in group b ias This trait has been described as a sense of nationalism when it is outward looki ng, but it can a lso be applied to national politics. This trait is reflected in the and it is also related to the use of scapegoats to blame for the ills of the moment. Leaders with high scores are very protective of t heir own kind, and they have a strong emotional attachment to their group, 32 Interview with Anonymous BOL#8 33 Molina (1999).

PAGE 211

211 and they tend to be patriotic. However, l eaders with low scores on in group bias by no means are less patriotic that those leaders who are high on in group bias. Leaders who combin e a not so strong sense of nationalism with a low sense of distrust of others are likely to conceive politics as a space of opportunities. Hermann contends that these leaders are proactive as opposed to reactive. For them, the world is not a dangerous plac e and the political conflicts are not constant threat s if taken in context. Moreover, they are focused on taking advantage of opportunities and relationships. Snchez de Lozada displayed a low degree of in group bias in his first term and a high degree in his second. Because he grew up in exile, his attachments to Bolivia were more abstract than personal. With escape he looked foreign and, like rural indigenous Bolivians, he was an outsider in his own country: while I looked like a camba [people from the north and east part of Bolivia], I spoke Spanish like an American, but I was actually a colla [people from the west part of Bolivia]. I was a good combination for all regional interests, but my weakness was th e popular side because I did 34 At no point did Snchez de Lozada tr y to fit in or change his image in order to be accepted as president and politician. He was very aware of his businessman image, whether or not he wanted to project it. H e was also aware of his inescapable American accent when he spoke Spanish, of his elite upbringing, education and personal relations. He made no apologies for who he was, where he came from, or even of how he made his fortune. Snch ez de Lozada said that given the fact that he won the highest number of votes in three elections, 1989, 1993 and 2002, his acceptance by the 34 Personal interview with President Gonzalo Snchez de Lozada.

PAGE 212

212 population as a leader in Bolivia is proven. 35 His lack of attention to conformity indicates that he was not inter ested in protecting a certain group he represented; instead he understanding of the world was not of a dangerous place that poses a threat. For him conflicts were to be tackled one by one since they depended on context. Moreover, for him the world brought opportunities and relationships, and therefore, by nature, his political stances were non confrontational. Indeed, Snchez de Lozada himself acknowledged the reasoning behind his acti ons: I have not changed [to fit in]; unfortunately people do not change much. I have always believed in debate and discussion, but I do not look for consensus ; I seek the truth. It is dialectic O ne has to accept that others can be right; one has to be ab le to make a thesis, an antithesis and then a synthe sis. In Bolivia there is always talk about consensus building, which means do nothing or change everything without changing anything. The dynamic I follow is dialectic and guides all the issues I deal wit h whether business related, intellectual or political. 36 After the turmoil of February 2002 a bullet was found in his presidential chair and he became more protective of the ideas and the inner circle of people with stances similar to his He started to feel threaten ed by those who called for referendum and adopted a defensive position. Distrust of others Hermann argues that the trust and distrust trait is likely to be based on past experience with the people involved and on the nature of a current situa tion. Leaders high in this trait are constantly vigilant and want to anticipate because the y see the world as a threat and problems are confronted as a zero sum game. Leaders who are 35 Personal interview with Preside nt Gonzalo Snchez de Lozada. 36 Personal interview with President Gonzalo Snchez de Lozada.

PAGE 213

213 more trustful see the world as source of opportunities, and instead of l ooking at adversaries as threats, they put them in perspective. Snchez de Lozada seemed to be more distrustful in his second term given the constant opposition to his actions, while he was moderate in his first. He was not a person that saw the world as a threat; he saw challenges and acted accordingly. He not using empathy but using logical reasoning. Since he was not a man driven by emotions or blind beliefs but rather on logic and r easoning he was not distrustful in a paranoid way. administration he relied on the same leadership style, both to make decisions and to interact with followers and advisors. As Barber (1972) suggested political success es shape the leadership style they will depend on in the future. As the context and the nature of the problems changed, when Snchez de Lozada reassumed office with an established vision he found himself out of touch with the functioning of Bolivian society. His efforts failed because social processes unfolded faster than his understanding of the changing environment. He could not prov ide leadership because The second presidency of Gonzalo Snchez de Lozada is an example of politics of disjunction. His response to the impossible situation that a disjunctive presi dency encounters one of affiliation with the governing coalition with a vulnerable political order is revealing, for it shows how a president familiar with forming coalitions could not deploy new resources on his own behalf, making his administration o ne that

PAGE 214

214 became paralyzed. He lacked creativity, and his legacy as Bolivian president became tarnished. The following description of Snchez de Lozada by Vice President Carlos Mesa in SDL II, illustrates that his decisions and his decision making process w ere shaped by attributes that define his personality traits: Gonzalo Snchez de Lozada has a flawless logic, a clear vision of what he wants and how he wants it. But there is a problem. The column on which his logic relies is out of balance; his gravity c enter is out of center; his building is falling. He fell because he assumed that intellectual designs can be applied mechanically to daily life in a crazy Bolivia, in which the relation between state and society is broken and in which the rule of law is st ill an exoticism. His economic logic, his sense of what Bolivia should do, his close outlook to what the world wanted actually, to what international organizations wanted ended up alienating him from reality. His idea of how to exercise power was twiste d. He was an emperor ; there was no room for sensible dialog and dialectic contrasts. He was a great seducer who conquered the best Bolivians who became active in his first administration I n his second administration he was isolated from the outside world he lived locked in the Government Palace and the reets for over a year his government, as much as the MNR defeated with his gov ernment, which Carlos Snchez inevitably geared up by its acquiescence. His government was defeated by MIR, its constant blackmail, and systematic corruption. He defeated his own administration with his sluggishness, his pigheadedness, his arbitrariness an d his dry style, which was polished in the hands of Washington advisers who mastered tactics and strategy. He was defeated also because his family was seduced by power while his entourage was swayed between anomy, astonishment and cowardice. In October 20 03 he was trapped in his own consciousness of power with a sense of destiny and a sense of mission that a lost bullet shot in February 2003 against the presidential chair had converted into an obsessive certainty (Mesa 2008, 74). Based on the intensity and combination of the personality traits displayed by Snchez de Lozada, Table 5 de Lozada was a president who challenged constraints

PAGE 215

215 and was moderately open to information, and whose motivations centered on problems as opposed to relationships. His focus of attention was on independently maintaining his own maneuverability, as well as he challenged constraints, but this time he was c losed to receive information he interpreted events according to his established understanding of what ought to be instead of what really making rticipation in referenda. As such, he was unable to change his strategy in a timely manner, and when he did, events had already developed too far from his control. Discus sion This chapter characterized Gonzalo Snchez de Lozada presidential leadership sty le based on trait analysis. Hermann (2003) suggests that the differences between where their behavior is validated. She will probably agree with the idea that Snchez de L information. While in his first term he was open to information, in the second his understanding of the polity was much less flexible. These perceptions are suggesti ve of how sensiti ve leaders are and how likely they are to act in particular political contexts. The more goal driven leaders, such as Snchez de Lozada, as opposed to environment driven leaders, interpret the environment through lenses structured by their beliefs, attitu des, motives, and passions. While Snchez de Lozada was able to

PAGE 216

216 environment did not allow him to see that consensus and yielding were necessary. Leaders like Snche z de Lozada live with a sense of self that is determined by the congruence between who they are and what they do, as opposed to being responsive to a particular situation. They act on the basis of a set of personal standards and seek out leadership positio ns where their standards generally are reinforced, as opposed to leaders who tailor their behavior to fit the demands of the situation and who maintain extensive networks to gather information. Because leaders like Snchez de Lozada tend to selectively per ceive information from their environment s, they have difficulty changing their attitudes and beliefs, as opposed to more flexible contextually driven leaders. Moreover, leaders like Snchez de Lozada choose associates who define issues as they do and who g enerally share their goals. As we saw, in SDL II, his mindset did not allow him to make allowances for those opposed to his views and when he did, it was too late and his reputation was already damaged. Furthermore, his opponents were quick to frame him a s someone defending foreign interests and the he needed to be flexible with the demands of the politic al time. His reading of reality was faulted because he had fixed ideas of what was needed for Bolivia and how to accomplish these goals. His image was so badly tarnished that he did not have the legitimacy to move forward on an ambitious agenda in the face of opposition. He was convinced that his plans and the way he would implement them were the only ones acceptable. This conviction led him to oppose a referendum when Constitutional

PAGE 217

217 reforms were being discussed, and this unmovable conviction was the immedi ate cause institutions a vision of a long term greater good. What he did not bring was flexibility; he thought his logic was faultless and that political conditions would not change. He was wrong.

PAGE 218

218 Table 5 s cores on seven traits Characteristic First presidency: Actively independent Second presidency: Expansionistic Challenger/respecter Challenger Challenger Belief ca n control events High High Need for power Low Moderate Openness information Open Close Contextual complexity High Low Self confidence Moderate High Motivation Problem/relationship Problem Problem Task vs. interpersonal focus Problem Problem In group bias Low High Distrust of others Moderate Leaning high

PAGE 219

219 CHAPTER 6 TICULATIVE PRESIDENC IES The Dominican Republic has a political tradition of domination under a single individual. In the twentieth century, besides Rafael Trujillo who ruled the country for thirty one years (1930 1961), there was Joaqun Balaguer, who demonstrated three incarnations: the authoritarian corporatist in the 1930s, the advocate for a freer but still controlled constitutional government in the 196 0s; and a kind of patrimonialist democrat in the 1980s and 1990s winning consecutive elections since 1986 (Wiarda, 1998). Despite this tradition, starting in 1996 the Dominican Republic experienced new leaderships under the presidencies of Leonel Fernnd ez and Hiplito Meja of the Dominican Liberation Party (PLD Partido de la Liberaci n Dominicana), and Dominican Revolutionary Party (PRD Partido Revolucionario Dominicano), respectively. Since the egarded as more institutionalized and consolidated than previously (Krykanek, 1996). Indeed, the 1994 held elections since 1978 (Skelley, 2007; Hartlyn, 1998; Jimenez Polanco, 1999). Although new leadership is considered paramount in bringing about significative change, the new developments have actually been characterized by the absence of change. By 2010, the country still remained a delegative democracy (Marsteintre det, 2010). Moreover, the idea that Dominican society did not destroy or dismiss social, economic and psychological commitments of the dominant class in order to adopt new ways of socialization and behavior still remains true (Jimenez Polanco, 1993). In th through chronological narrative, from the return to democratic politics in 1978 up to

PAGE 220

220 2008 with a each of the presidencies placed in the life cycle of one stable political order. T he conventional structural and institutional explanations of the Dominican explanatory power is complemented with the analysis of presidential leadership in the two non c onsecutive terms of Leonel Fernndez. Table 6 1 summarizes the classification of Dominican presidencies in the aforementioned time frame within one long lasting clientelistic political order, and classifies each presidency in its relation with secular and political time. Both of hored in the clientelistic order, and with his actions he contributed to deepen changes within this order. T his chapter suggest s articulative presidencie s because he did not reject the previous order but sought to reform it from within the pre existing political order. Clientelistic Political Order ed from that of most other L atin American countries, as it was an isolated outpost of the Spanish empire lacking in agricultural and mineral wealth. It also had only a small indigenous population as a result of decimation during the colonial period. Yet the country did not benefit fr om the leveling effects of poverty and isolation shared by all. International influences including the Haitian control, 1 annexation attempts by the U.S. economic crisis and the lack of national integration, all played decisive roles in the rise and fall of governments (Hartlyn 1998, 1999; Wiarda, 1992) It was not until well into the 1 The Dominican Republ i c is the only former Spanish colony that did not break free from Spain but from Haiti. Thus, the anti Haitian sentiment has a long tradition

PAGE 221

221 twentieth century that the Dominican Republic experienced political stability, albeit 30 1961). Trujillo was the de facto ruler for over 30 years; he formally assumed power for the first time in 1930 until 1938, and again from 1942 to 1952. Yet Trujillo remained in power by having several nominal presidents acting in his behalf; Jacinto Pe ynado (1938 1940), Manuel Troncoso de la Concha (1940 (1952 1960) and Joaqun Balaguer (1960 1962). Trujillo did not le a d a military regime, although he used his army to rule the Dominican Republic with an iron fist His power was based on a praetorian guard as his personal instrument (Hartlyn and Espinal, 1988). The military was not a professional institution; it was a force that supported a personality cult to Trujillo. Given the political violence, political activ ities against Trujillo developed overseas. 2 Trujillo sentiments developed, and the sitting president Balaguer was forced to resign. There was a short period of civilian government under Juan Bosch o f the PRD was restored, 3 only to be the attempts to maintain the status quo. Bosch had engaged in social reform that went trujillistas the military, the Catholic Church and the commercial bourgeoisie whose power was based in extensive land tenure and trade and who sought to maintain the control of the state and public corporations. The military 2 For instance, the PRD was funded in Cuba by Juan Bosch and other Dominican exiles. The Democratic Dominican Union (UDD) was funded in Venezuela. 3 In the 1962 elections, Juan Bosch the presidential candidate for the PRD, garnered most of the vote by receiving 58.7 percent.

PAGE 222

222 that was set to follow Trujillo was not pa rticularly prepared to protect and lead a nation. With no leader to follow, the elite became divided and the U.S. intervened directly in the island by sending more than 20,000 U.S. troops to crush the civil war in 1965. In its quest to prevent any communis t flare, the U.S. had a special interest in the Dominican Republic. 4 Through a pact between the military, the oligarchy, and the U.S, in 1966 president. 5 The Dominica n Republic was unable to develop, much less to institutionalize, any kind of partial oligarchic competition after the assassination of Trujillo. The end of the Trujillo regime did not lead to transfer of power to other social sectors. It was a time of cont inuities, in which the persistence of traditional ways of doing things overlaps of modern and traditional, of authoritarian and democratic was the rule (Wiarda, 1998), state 6 reconcile [democracy and strong government] opposing tensions for over th ree 7 Indeed, he was President of the Dominican Republic for over 22 years, inaugurated seven times, and was the dominant political figure up to his death in 2002. 4 During the 1950s and 1960s, the region became friendly to communist tendencies. In an attempt to counterbalance these and assure loyalty, the U.S. deployed several strategies, from military to imm igration policies (i.e. opening of a United States consulate in the city of Santiago in 1962, which later became key for the mass emigration of Dominicans to the US, particularly to New York.) 5 Ironically, the U.S. that had helped oust him from power in 1 962 also helped Balaguer win the 1966 elections. After his resignation in 1962, Balaguer settled in exile in the U.S., witnessing from afar the election of Bosch, the revolutionary build up, the civil war and the U.S. intervention. The Organization of Amer ican States intervened during the civil war by sending a peace force and becoming a negotiation facilitator. 6 Wiarda 1998: 189. 7 Idem p.194.

PAGE 223

223 The between 1966 and 1978 did not break completely with the past T herefore his administration was articulative The despotic rule of Trujillo was gradually transformed under the control of Balaguer, but it remained authoritarian in nature. The orientations of this clientelistic political order were give n by the beliefs in fairness and justice held by Trujillo, and then by Balaguer. These ideas were absent, since they did not fit their interests; namely, to remain in power at all cost. actions, nor was any regard for human rights or democracy. Balaguer was a conservative economic modernizer with a paternalistic view of the state. He wante d the Dominican Republic to become a modern country and the way to reach that goal was to build so ciety through the state. He considered that society was unable to come up with its own solutions T hus the role of the state, and his role as President, was to civilize the Dominican society through imposed modernization, no matter the cost. This is what d efined his order creating project involved nation project was self serving. The institutional logic was to satisf y the interests of the elite, thereby servicing their own interests by establishing personal relations. Balaguer also extended small clientelist benefits to the poor. order affirming in that Bal aguer kept an even smaller group of loyalists that acted as a praetorian guard. While subtle manner, by providing them access to state resources and favoring them with s pecial privil eges to satisfy their appetites, and he created a larger clientelistic network

PAGE 224

224 Similar to Trujillo, Balaguer believed that order emerged from above, from him slef alone. The structure of the state and its po licies followed this orientation. Furthermore, like Trujillo, Balaguer perceived Haiti as the biggest obstacle for the develo pment of the Dominican Republic. T herefore, political stances were of strong nationalism and anti Haitian with a horrifi c racist discourse. 8 Balaguer's rule was marked by corruption, attempts of military coups, right wing terrorism, assassinations and activity of left wing guerrilla groups. 9 As opposed to ined with strong state society. Balaguer owed the U.S. for his reinstatement to power in 1966 and for much of the political and economic support, particularly during t he first years. He reduced the direct influence of U.S. officials and advisers 10 soon after taking office in 1966. Nevertheless, in order to rule the country, he relied on U.S. aid in the form of donations, and on multilateral organizations in loans and dev elopment programs. This U.S. dependence was so important, in 1973, at a critical point when the U.S. negotiated the sugar quota, 11 Balaguer offered his resignation to President Richard Nixon instead of the Dominican people. Moreover, the U.S. was the guaran tor of business ventures that 8 oathed H aitians and considered 9 ary operatives to terrorize the population. More than three thousand Dominicans died as a result of its actions. In addition the military was used to assassinate opposition figures (Moya Pons, 2010). 10 As the civil war had left a power vacuum, the U.S. man aged the country, providing enormous economic aid, and virtually ruling the country. 11

PAGE 225

225 ranged from mining and industry to service provision, while Balaguer offered generous concessions to attract foreign investment to the Dominican Republic. l parties, with the exception of Marxist organizations, but politics was limited by the military, police and paramilitary forces tha t engaged in repressive tactics and violence to restrain opposition figures, trade unionists and peasants. However, Balaguer was careful to distance himself, so that no direct connection could be drawn between suppression and his exercise of power H reelected, thereby keeping the appearance of constitutionality. In addition, Balaguer kept Congress completely subordinated to the presidency, which in turn was supported by the high command of the military and the business elite (mainly associated with the Balaguer undertook policies that expanded the size of the state, developed infrastructure, and promoted economic diversification in the manufacturing area, by offering state credit and promoting public investment. He developed a relationship of dependence with foreign investors and an elite business sector, which participated as contractor and provider for the state. Balaguer offered incentives for operations, provided benefits and protection to those who engaged in business with the state, even when some p rivate companies competed with the public companies. His personalized arrangements incorporated selected businessmen into advisory councils and state agencies (Conaghan and Espinal, 1990). Government officials and military officers benefited with contracts for public works, tax exemptions, and credit, all contributing to make market competition unfair. He was able to co opt the small middle class by means

PAGE 226

226 of targeted economic policies and clientelistic practices, which allow ed him to maintain control over p olitical participation. In 1972 Balaguer enacted an agrarian reform, which did not aim to favor or change the dependent condition of the peasants, even though it marked the end of large holdings in rice producing areas. Instead, it was a policy designed to promote urban and industrial growth at the expense of the rural areas. The administration controlled the prices of agricultural products, keeping them low to encourage large land tenants to sell their land and to diversify their investments. His patronage and personalistic way of doing politics also extended to other groupings through the use of his Reformist Party (PR Partido Reformista) as the instrument to distribute favors from land titles to charity for children and a vast array of public works. Ove 1978) was a mix of guile, judiciary and military corruption, and widespread voter fraud. His extensive clientelistic network allowed him to remain in power because thousands of workers and families depended on his personalist ic apparatus for their well being, jobs and livelihoods. In 1978, the Dominican Republic made its transition to democracy, but the process was ambivalent, as it was led by an ambivalent politician who personified Dominican politics. Just as in the three p revious elections, in the 1978 presidential sice he appointed the Electoral Central Board (J NE Junta Central Electoral), was backed up by the military and had absolute control of the state resources and government. 12 However, over time the o pposition PRD grew in popularity among the 12 The state was the owner of 60 percent of the sugar pr oduction. It was the only producer of electricity and the only importer of oil. It had the monopoly of services, as well as nearly 50 commercial and industrial companies (Moya Pons, 2010)

PAGE 227

227 lower, and middle class, particularly among urban dwellers. 13 The coup against Bosch in 1963 and the consecutive events that led to civil war and U.S. intervention strengthened during Balaguer ruling the PRD leadership was persecuted, but it was ultimately able to challenge Balaguer in the electoral contest of 1978 with its candidate, Antonio Guzman. As shown in Table 6 2, the election resulted in a strong PRD electoral performance and the victory of Guzman over Balaguer by over 9 % Balaguer fo rces provoked a strong reacti on with no historical precedent. Civil organizations launched widely attended peaceful protest s and a campaign for resistance (Moya Pons, 2010). Balaguer admitted defeat only after considerable international and domestic mobilization over the rigged elect ions. 14 With pressure by emphasis on democracy and human rights intervention, 15 npopularity, the sharp decline in price of sugar and the sudden opportunity for a change of leadership, as well as U.S. pressure, made possible the transition to democracy. 13 The PRD was founded in Cuba in 1939 by Juan Bosch and other Domini can exiles during the Trujillo dictatorship, and it was founded again in the Dominican Republic in 1962. It was a leftist party that established deep roots in society. 14 The support of the business elite for democracy only became explicit when important bu siness leaders rejected the coup. 15 The 1978 elite consensus was the result of secret negotiations between the dominant political party (Joaqun Party or PRD). Elite behavior in the Dominican Republic changed with regard to respecting electoral democracy, where political and military leaders refrained from challenging the regime (Snchez, 1992). These agreements were of paramount importance in dep oliticizing the Dominican armed forces and provided Joaqun Balaguer, who had won the presidency in the three previous elections through coercion and manipulation, a graceful exit from power.

PAGE 228

228 whic h the PR was granted a majority in the senate and a large minority in the Chamber of Deputies, as shown in Table 6 3 in exchange of the presidency. This deal protected Balaguer and his officials, who also managed to keep control of the judicial branch. Bal aguer sought a graceful exit from power as he accepted the defeat and became the main opposition. it an outcome pushed for by the middle class or even the business elite. It was an unexpected turn of events of an electoral procedure and political pacts that sought to quell growing domestic discontent and foreign pressures. The Antonio Guzmn Preemptiv e presidency (1978 1982) In Skowroneks original work (1993), no case study illustrates a preemptive presidency. 16 However, he considers a preemptive president to be one who is not aligned with the popular polices of the day or the coalition that has been in control of government. A president in this situation faces the challenge to try to place his stamp on politics while being constrained by the incongruence between his political identity and the political interests prevalent in a resilient political ord er. This is precisely the case of the two PRD presidencies that inaugurated democracy in the Domin ican Republic in the third wave: Antonio Guzmn (1978 1982) and Salvador Jorge (1982 1986). Until 1978, communist parties in the Dominican Republic were banne d and opposition parties had suffered sy 16 Only in the after word of the 1997 edition does Skowronek des cribe some features of American preemptive presidents (Tyler, Andrew Johnson, Wilson, Nixon and Clinton).

PAGE 229

229 intimidation. Even though t he PRD was never illegal nor communist, by doctrine and principle it was a leftist party. 17 Over the years, the PRD garnered support from the p oor, especially the urban poor who had no particular connection to the clientelistic arrangements of Balaguer. The PRD was considered the party of the masses while the PR was the conservative party with support from the business elite and the military wit h a large clientelistic and patronage network. Dominicans voted for the PRD based on the ideology it professed and the image it built as the party that opposed authoritarianism. lived exper ience with Bosch the party did not have in office experience with policies. But expectations were high, and social pressure for economic and social benefits was enormous. At first, Guzman enjoyed vast political support, but the newly organized actors voice d enormous demands for liberty, redistribution and development. Willing to detach his political to that of the established system. He led a party seeking major social a nd economic changes, but his leftist rhetoric did not coincide with his own social position or his actions. 18 When he assumed office it was not clear how he was going to harness the existing mood and guide it in a more positive direction. Guzman had a stro ng mandate, as shown in Table 6 2, with nine points over Balaguer. The economic uncertainties of the time and the failure of Balaguer in enhancing social conditions opened the door for Guzman. Guzman was an opposition leader forthrightly com mitted to chang e the course. A t first it seemed that he had an opportunity to be president of reconstruction and that he was attempting to establish a 17 The PRD did not participate in the 1970 and 1974 elections due to systematic political violence against its leaders and supporters (Moya Pons, 2002 ; Hartlyn, 1998; Wiarda, 1998). 18 Guzman was a moderate landowner and a long time member of the PDR.

PAGE 230

230 new order by rolling back the terms of the existing conservative political and socio economic establishment. However, d e to shift the political orientations of the state and society. His leadership and the timing of his presidency did not allow him to assemble a new majority coalition or to institutionalize a new political or der. The existing institutions were molded to keep Balaguer in power. These institutions which ranged from state employees to the extensive clientelistic network, responded to Balaguer, only proving that the political order he transformed was resilient. G uzman was a preemptive president who had to navigate a course in the face of adverse ideological currents. He tried to develop a viable political strategy that accommodated the continuing, unsympathetic, ideological framework of the Balaguer system, and si multaneously he needed to create a new and sustainable political coalition that worked at both elite and popular levels. He did so by spending (Keefer, 2005). Guzman comm itted a series of fatal errors starting with his order shattering actions which involved his attempt to establish his presidency above the fray by taking a highly pragmatic approach to politics and distancing himself from his ow n party. As Skowronek affir ms, it is a feature of a preemptive president to state his independence from the received party mandate. It did not help that upon taking office Guzman controlled the administration, dismissing his party comrades I nstead his inner circle, composed of fami ly, relatives and friends took the most important government positions. Inside the PDR, things were not easy for Guzman I n order to get the nomination of his party he confronted his rival Salvador Jorge who supported him in

PAGE 231

231 the general elections, but o nly to defeat Balaguer. Rivalries in the PDR showed a fragmented party that Guzman was unable to manage after the election; personalism, rivalries, and abusive clientelism plagued his administration (Lozano, 2002). The conservative business elite, that ha d supported the transfer of power, to make sure its business interests would not be threatened, 19 relying on senate control of With an anti communist stance and facing a government decision making style that disregarded their interests the business elite attacked the government permissiveness of growing unions. I n addition to elite opposition, intraparty rivalries weak and unable to focus on the long a waited reforms Lacking the authority to challenge fundamentally the terms in which the state operated, he made little progress government by putting party leaders and activists on th e payroll, as part of his order affirming efforts. With a large number of state employees a major fraction of the national budget went to pay salaries, with a payroll that grew by 50 % during his administration (Kryzanek and Wiarda, 1988), thus lea ving little room for social investment. As fiscal accounts deteriorated, his economic policies sought to compensate for the lack of revenue. The administration printed money and became highly indebted to multilateral organizations. In order to satisfy his order creating efforts tried to fuel rural development projects that historically lacked financing, and he tried to implement 19 The elite established the National Council of Businessmen (CNHE Consejo Nacional de Hombres de Empresa), which became an active political player.

PAGE 232

232 agrarian reform, ignoring existing laws. He also tried to revive the Dominican agricultural sector that wa s disregarded during the last years of the Balaguer presidency. Like Balaguer, Guzman subsidized food as a way to build his own clientelistic network. He also subsidized the vast inefficient state companies. In an effort to differentiate himself from Balag uer, his order creating impulses led him to nationalize public transport and to raise the minimum wage. As a response to these policies, the private sector increased prices leading to increased increased and causing a reduction of the purchase power with the given wages. provide sound economic, social or institutional policies, nor could it sustain the clientelist relationships it built. In addition, in 1979 two hurricanes left thousand s homeless and caused widespread damage, both amidst economic deterioration that included high fuel s oon as Guzman assumed power, he sta r ted to work towards reelection, when his own party was by tradition the political force that had always opposed presidential reelection. Throughout this time s vice president Jacobo Majluta, and instead chose Salvador Jorge as its presidential candidate. In t T he faction led by Jorge beat Majluta and pressured the party leader, Francisco Pea, to organize his

PAGE 233

233 unsuccessfully th e help of Balaguer and the military to prevent him from assuming power. Finding himself isolated, accused of corruption and of favoring the enrichment of cronies, and faced with the prospect of legal charges, Guzman committed suicide in July 1982, only a mo nth before finishing his term. Indeed, one of the characteristic risks of preemptive presidencies is that in trying to char t a different way to govern, president s appear to wholly lack political principles and are often branded as unscrupulous and cynicall y manipulative (Skowronek 1993: 449). Despite the failure of his leadership, in terms of democracy the Guzman administration was a step forward in sending signals to quell authoritarianism P olitical prisoners were released and political exiles were able to return. However, these was eased, and Congress was granted more leeway. Furthermore, contributions to democracy was the depoliticizing of the Dominican military and he purged Balaguer military supporters from government (Moya Pons, 2010) as an attempt to affirm his own preemptive leadership. Guzman failed in building a s ustainable political coalition, because he could not cou nt on hi s own party for support, he did not include professionals in the state administration to create institutions, nor did he gain support by the business elite. The Salvador Jorge Preemptive pres idency (1982 1986) I n 1982 another PRD candidate, Salvador Jorge won the elections, and for the presidency was preemptive although it seemed to have the opportunity to become reconstructive. He rode into power with a party opposed to a previously dominant rule.

PAGE 234

234 urban masses as well as with the business community. He was determined not to make the mistakes of Guzman by isolating his party order shattering actions started by establishing a close relation with leading businessmen. At that time, businessmen realized they needed state support for policies to benefit the growing private sector. They also realized that having a war with the Balaguer dominated state administration would result in increasing social mobilization and uncertain results. A dramatic shift in the tone of the relationship between business and government took place with the inauguration of the new president. Jorge assumed office in an unfavorable economic climate. The Guzman administration had left a country serious ly indebted, with high inflation and declining promised to restore confidence in the country. His criticism of the previous administration was less important politically t alternative. However, he did not make explicit the policies that he eventually implemented: extreme austerity measures, a contraction of public and private credit, and arrangements with the IMF. Indeed, as part of his order shuttering actions, the Jorge administration appealed to the IMF for financial aid which was conceded only after the government agreed to implement adjustment policies. His order affirming actions undermined support for its own program, as the admi nistration maintained an ambivalent discourse by denouncing the IMF impositions at the same time that it implemented them.

PAGE 235

235 Economic adjustment caused great economic pressure on the government and society since the measures involved reducing the fiscal deficit and devaluation of the domestic currency. This led to disturbances with food riots. To order affirm his actions and to control the situation, Jorge called the military to repress the population. The most came the crushing of protesters in April party platform were favorable to labor, 20 his adjustment policies caused high unemployment and the growth of the informal sector, maki ng the already weakened labor unions more vulnerable (Conaghan and Espinal 1990). 21 For these reasons, Jorge did not provide a coherent alternative as a leader opposed to the previous rule, nor was he able to cut deeply into the political, institutional or ideological bedrock of the Balaguer apparatus. The mounting economic hardships added to widespread PRD clientelism, and with regards to wage increases led to riots and general strikes. 22 In addition, creditors suspended loans to the Dominican around the ideological spectrum, zigzagging in t heir policy commitments and crafting a nek calls a a situation in which the president tried to be independent, but at the same 20 In 1 984, more than 100 new unions were certified by the Labor Ministry (Espinal, 1995). 21 Due to disagreements, the most important labor unions, the General Central of Workers (CGT Central General de Trabajadores) and the General Union of Dominican Workers (UG TD Union General de Trabajadores Dominicanos), were divided. Thus the labor movement had no chance to obtain concessions. 22 In 1984 there were 103 protest movements; in 1986 there were 293 (Espinal 1995, 69 71).

PAGE 236

236 policies Jorge became isolated. This leadership stance is characteristic of preemptive presidents, such as the cases of U.S. came to be a personal and constitu tional test of will that culminated in a devastating collapse of presidential authority. Moreover, just as under Guzman, when Jorge became president, his party was Jor party in Congress. Majluta was the president of the senate and controlled the party faction in Congress which opposed Jorge consistently preventing the approval of laws for the implementation of his economic program. The division, violence and fraud presidential elections. Party factions distributed state posts in exchange of support for Majluta, who became the PRD presidential candidate and provided the opportunity for Despite the negative performance of the Jorge administration in providing solutions to the problems of the day, the Jorge presidency contributed to the efforts order creating efforts h elped to institutionalize and professionalize pockets within the military by dismissing and replacing both top and middle rank officials. At first, this allowed him to build a support group within the military, but as more firings continued, due to Jorge of the influences of the U.S. military policy also led adversaries to suspect him of building a military force loyal only to himself. Jorge did little to dispel this idea and t he press was quick to learn of Jorge

PAGE 237

237 lavish gifts to military and some civilian supporters. Moreover, his administration was also plagued with accusations of corruption orchestrated by Balaguer supporters. eemptive presidency, and in the end Jorge reproduc ed inability of Guzman and Jorge to develop a new political space for their party agenda illustrates the complex and highly uncertain nature of p reemptive leadership. The two PRD administrations saw an increase of legislative activity (more independent) with real debates over policy, to the extent that Congress became a moderate force in challenging the executive. But these administrations suffered from overwhelming intraparty rivalries and disputes that went from policy to corruption. The Balaguer system proved to be resistant to both PRD administrations, as public support was strong for an activist government that would deliver through clientelist ic channels. Balaguer appeared to be the only Dominican leader able to impose political authority in the state, society and the economy. The Joaqun Balaguer A rticulative presidency (1986 1990) The tough, brilliant old president who shaped and directed th e old system once again returned to office to reinforce it. As explained previously, Balaguer had founded the conservative rightist PR in 1964, and he refurbished his political machine in 1985. This allowed him to return to power for the second time in 198 6 under the recently funded Social Christian Reformist Party (PRSC Partido Reformista Social Cristiano), only this time under the democratic mantle. The PR became the PRSC after it associated with the Revolutionary Christian Democratic Party, establishing international convey it was a democratic party, it remained a personalistic and clientelistic vehicle for

PAGE 238

238 aut horitarian Balaguer. However, moderate 23 Traditionally the PR/PRSC had maintained support from the economic elite and the peasantry, but with the growth of the cities and the implementation of the import substitution industrialization model, peasant support was undermined, as the rural areas did not receive the necessary attention from the state. The conservative and upper middle classes supported Balaguer (Lozano, 2002), but Balaguer did not have the military that had accompanied him in his twelve years of previous ruling. Aft er eight years of PRD administration, civil society in the Dominican Republic had acquired more importance, particularly business and the middle class. But hopes diminished for change through electoral means, and social movements question ed the country's a uthoritarian structure and, above all, the dizzying fall of living standards (Cassa, 1997). 1990 ) was articulative, as he was able to continue the essential authoritarian outlines of the state system that he left in 19 78 he maintained the support of the business community via economic favors and advantages, as part of his order affirming impulse. order shattering actions led his administration ch consisted in persecuting his predecessor return to the presidency Balaguer used both the justice system, which he controlled, and the media to discredit Jorge and his c ollaborators (Lozano, 2002). The PRD administrations were branded as the most corrupt and inefficient in the Dominican 23 Wiarda (1998: 192).

PAGE 239

239 24 His campaign was successful in isolating Jorge, who was abandoned by friends, collaborators and party comrades, sinc e any association with Jorge made individuals into deplorable persons. 25 In 1987 Jorge was tried in absentia and sentenced to 20 years in prison. He served several months in prison and spent most of the rest of his life fighting in courts. 26 Balaguer manage d not only to destroy the prestige and influence of Jorge and of the PRD, but also to policies. His order shattering impulses also led him to bring back the military officials that were dismissed during the PRD administrations. Fearing Jorg sympathizers and instead appointed radical rightists. Balaguer also reversed the few liberal economic policies that were implemented under the PRD administrations and replaced them of the economy to the government. 27 I nherit ing an economic mess, he sought to carry infrastructure as part of his order creating efforts, but a spiraling budget deficit led to rising inflation and deteriorating external balances. At first he sought to run the economy the way he used to, but with deteriorating conditions he had to back up, and eventually he app ealed intermittently to the IMF for help. In 1989, the IMF sponsored policies that sharply reduced inflation and stabilized the exchange rate, but it also resulted in a deep 24 Former ministers an d government officials during the Jorge administration were also accused of crimes and corruption, the most salient being corruption over the overpriced sale of military supplies that included unlawful commissions. 25 Jorge sought asylum in the Venezuelan E mbassy, but his request was denied. After several regrettable vicissitudes, he was granted permission to travel to the U.S. to receive medical treatment when his health deteriorated. 26 2004), Salvador Jorge was vindicated of charges of corruption during his administration. 27 See Moya Pons (2010), particularly chapter twenty one.

PAGE 240

240 recession. 28 By the end of the decade, the economy was stagna nt with low growth, ri sing inflation, food shortages, and capital flight. Most dramatic was the emigration of thousands of hopeless poor and middle class Dominicans to the US, Puerto Rico, and Venezuela. 29 For those who stayed, the adjustment provoked a strong reaction in the po pulation Pr otests emerged everywhere, with unions, professional organizations, urban poor, peasants and agricultural workers demanding better salaries and conditions. Protests were violently crushed, particularly i n February 1988, June 1988, February 1989 and May 1989, resulting in the death s of dozens of citizens. The movements were never well organized, and they generally suffered from a lack of clear direction (Cassa, 1997). The Joaqun Balaguer A rticulative presidency (1990 1994) The 1990 presidential elections took place in a period of solid party identification with strong leaders, embodied by Joaqun Balaguer, Juan Bosch, 30 and Francisco Pea. 31 Indeed, t he most important contenders were the historical leaders of the three most important parties. With PLD, gained prestige in the wake of the discredit the PRD suffered after its eight years 28 dependence on impor ted energy, the exhaustion of the import substitution model, the inadequacy of adjustment measures adopted and persistent fiscal deficits. 29 The rural Dominicans were not necessarily the poorest, since the Dominican Republic has traditionally relied on Hai tians for harvests and country labor work. The rural Dominicans owned their land which was considered very valuable. Local production has consistently been insufficient to meet internal consumption and in later years the tourists (Interview with Anonymous DR #3). 30 Juan Bosch founded the PLD in 1973 after splitting from the PRD. It was founded as a Marxist party, and in its early years it was quite radical with and anti it was a cadre party, with partisans subjected to rigorous training and disciplinary actions. 31 Francisco Pea was former protg of Bosch, and he became one of the leaders of the PRD after Bosch left the as a key figure in the party; he was black and of Haitian origin. Conscious of the racism in the political class and the difficulties to overcome an anti Haitian societal discourse, he stepped back, allowing Guzman (1978), Jorge (1982) and Majluta (1986) t presidential candidates. After surviving a heart attack, Pea believed it was his destiny to become Dominican

PAGE 241

241 in the presidency from 1978 to 1986. Moreover, the PRD went to the elections particularly weakened, due to the internal disputes between Pea and Majluta; the latter left the party only months previous to the election. Bosch had moderated his discourse and gained appeal to the poorest groups of the nation to the point of seriously challenging Balaguer in the 1 990 elections. However, Balaguer was reelected in 1990 in an irregular electoral process. 32 The PRD under the leadership of Francisco Pea recognized irregularities but considered the elections legitimate overall, while the PLD argued fraud. The fraud was q uite evident as it took 58 days for a Balaguer controlled Electoral Central Board (JCE Junta Central Electoral) to declare Balaguer the winner. His authority, although con tested in the elections was not contested by the state, and he had no intention to deviate from his way of ruling. Hence, in this presidency he sought to continue reinforcing its articulative nature, but without resources to import oil and with deteriorat ing conditions H e was able to remain in office despite enormous domestic political and social pressure only after he announced possible resignation and free elections for 1992. 33 This maneuver created confusion among the opposition, giving time to threat en and bribe politicians and union leaders. Balaguer also promised reforms to confront the economic crisis without really knowing how to tackle it. He agreed on the thorough implementation of reforms only after the Cardinal Archbishop warned Balaguer of t he dangers of continuing with his monetary and economic policies 32 cards at high prices. Thousands of peasants and urban poor sold their cards, effectively depriving the PLD of their votes. 33 The country was paralyzed from September to November of 1990 without fuel, as the governme nt could not Pons (2010), particularly chapter twenty one.

PAGE 242

242 and the imminent danger of being ousted by popular protests (Moya Pons 2010). It was hard for Balaguer to accept the blame for the crisis and to back off from his stance against the IMF, but he had no choice but to accept its demands for fiscal discipline. He created the Pact of Economic Solidarity (PSE Pacto de Solidaridad Econ mica), signing it with the business community and purposefully excluding the opposition parties. This was the order shattering platform of the PLD and was designed by business groups consisted of structural adjustment policies and the liberalization of the economy. By 1991, the Balaguer administration switc hed the rationale of its economic policies, implementing them with the aid of the IMF and the international community without all the systems and processes that he had created in all his previous years as president. He kept responding to the same social in terests as before, protecting the institutional wid ening the tax base and controlling exchange rates and inflation, all of which caused hardship on the population. Howev er, with time and a favorable international economic environment, he was able to revitalize the economy. Moreover, with liberalization several sources of power and clientelism were reduced giving the impression that there was a new, and less corrupt, poli tical order altogether. However, Balaguer (1990 1994) remained an articulative president only changing his position with regards to keeping the Dominican Republic isolated from the global trends. In his effort to modernize the country, his order creating impulse led him to open the country to foreign investment, and he created export processing zones seeking to attract foreign investment. He transformed the country into a premier tourist

PAGE 243

243 destination 34 and targeted his efforts to showing development in visib le areas (electricity, water, housing, transportation) through state corporations. With massive infrastructure works, fewer black outs, irrigation, and Santo Domingo looking more modern with roads and monuments, the country was dynamized. The liberal monet ary policies that included the liberalization of the currency remained stable until 1994 when a growing trade deficit increased. Since there was a new economic order, a neoliberal one, the relationship between the state and society seemed to have changed in the eyes of many, particularly the international community. However, this change was superficial ; the s neoliberalism changed in economic terms but politically remained the same. The Balaguer controlled state reduced its role in econ omically supporting the poor. It reduced food subsidies, and the opportunities for the private sector opened with fewer restrictions and controls. The state bureaucracy with its activity in sugar, electricity and construction was the major employer in the country (Kryzanek, 1996). However as the economy grew to other sectors the private sector provided more jobs, reforms were not followed by public administration reforms, and the administration order affirming impulse. 35 The state remained captured by the strong executive of Balaguer with weak administrative laws, a high degree of political clientelism, and insufficient With regards to the military Balaguer continually reshuffled military officers and turned a 34 Puerto Plata and La Romana (1980s), as well as later developments targeted for other areas such as Bavaro (1990s and 2000s), became top world tourist destinations. 35 Despite timid policies to formalize public administration service in 1991, the quality of administration remained compromised by the discretionary presidency.

PAGE 244

244 blind eye on corruption, remaining personally untouched. As the 1994 elections approached, political uncertainty made the market rates increase substantially. Furthermore, problems in servicing the foreign debt were remedied by intermittent assistance from the IMF, which advised austerity measures that caused strong public discontent and civil disorder. The recession affected busine sses, and Balaguer had to placate the private sector, particularly the financial system, tourism and duty free zones with bribes and promises. 36 The Joaqun Balaguer Articulative Presidency (1994 1996) In the 1994 election the historical leaders faced each other for a second time, with Balaguer and Bosh being the most senior candidates. 37 To counterbalance their images as patriarchs, each chose a younger running mate: Balaguer with Jacinto Peynado for the PRSC, 38 Pea with Fernando Alvarez for the PRD, and Ju an Bosch with Leonel Fernndez for the PLD. 39 By 1994 the PRD was no longer fragmented. Pea united all factions and became a challenging contender, not only for his political discourse, but also for what he s presidency with the potential to create disorder. 40 The party with less chance of success was the PLD, as the leadership of Bosch had lost electoral appeal. 36 Intervie w with Anonymous DR #8. 37 Balaguer was 88 years old, he was blind and physically weakened. Bosch was 85 years old showing signs of mental weakness (Interview with Anonymous DR #7, Anonymous DR #5, and Anonymous DR #9). At 55, Pea was the youngest. 38 Jacin to Peynado was a businessman with good connections in the military. 39 portrayed as smart young lawyer who spent his childhood and youth in New York 40 For Pea, as opposed to Balaguer and Bosch who had a top down view for development, the Dominican Republic had a society capable to bring social democracy and development; he believed change would emerge from the bottom up.

PAGE 245

245 As shown in Table 6 4, these elections registered the lowest levels of absenteeism in the country since Balaguer had been losing popularity, particularly due to the adjustment policies and his continued disregard for social reforms. As in previous elections Balaguer attempted reelection using widespread electoral fraud, but this time the evidence was better documented by the opposition parties, and there was a larger and better prepared group of international observers monitoring the elections. 41 Furthermore, pressure from the international comm unity with the OAS, UN and the U.S. Embassy was extensive. 42 On the verge of major turmoil, Balaguer was elected president only after party elites and a number of relevant social groups, including the Catholic Church, 43 private sector and military signed th shortened and the constitution was amended. 44 As shown in Figure 6 1, personal opinions of Balaguer were negative until the economy recovered during the summer of 1992, when opinions became positive until the elections. However, after the attempts to remain in power, opinions became negative again, becoming positive only after the agreement on constitutional reform. For the rest of his term they remained negative. 41 Voter disenfranchisement became evident after the JCE admitted the existence of two national lists of voters, clean and altered one. The latter was a voter list that purged PRD registered members and the one that was used on Election Day. 42 With the Haitian crisis next door resul ting in a large emigration of Haitians, particularly to the U.S and a subsequent fragile return of Aristide, international pressure was enormous. 43 The majority of the traditional conservative leadership of the country, including the Catholic Church with t he bishops and business leaders, openly favored Balaguer. 44 The original agreement was to have elections in November 1995, but then the date was moved to May 1996. Pea Gomez was advised of the maneuver but after the fierce battle he was tired and in poor health (Interview with Anonymous DR #5).

PAGE 246

246 O followed the same pattern, as shown in Figure 6 2. The 1994 compromise altered substantially the political landscape, as it showed that Balaguer was not unbeatable and that he needed the collaboration of ot her politicians in order to legitimate his ruling. The constitutional reform positively affected the political system as it established clear electoral rules. However, t he changes responded to a political crisis situation and did not represent a planned st rategy. For this reason, the constitutional reform was not designed to change the structure of the country. The constitutional changes facilitated the removal of a president believed to have gained office through fraudulent means and abolished immediate r e election for an incumbent president. Initially it included the election of the president in a first round if the candidate reached 45 % of the total vote. However, at the last minute the draft was changed by PRSC and PLD politicians to raise the th reshold to 50 % because it was thought to be easy for Pea Gomez to garner 45 % in the next election. Other constitutional reforms included non concurrent Congressional and municipal elections, to reduce the tail gate effect of presidential ca ndidates in the composition of Congress, and the establishment of the National Council of Magistrates ( CNM Consejo Nacional de Magistratura), responsible for the selection of judges to the Supreme Court. 45 Like the 1966 Constitution, the 1994 Constitution provided the legal framework for the a strong presidency, effectively undermining the chances to create horizontal checks and balances. 46 45 Marsteintredet (2010) considers the 2004 judicial reforms the most important result of the pact between Balaguer and Bosch, as the guarantee for Balaguer to keep control of the country. 46 Constitutional articles include: governing by decree when there is a need of national importance (which can be loosely interpreted), the

PAGE 247

247 The agreement that permitted Balaguer to continue gover ning also stated that the elected Congressional candidates were to be sworn and occupy their positions as senators and deputies until 1998, despite all the flaws found in the electoral process. As shown in Table 6 3 the PRD had a plurality of seats in both one senate seat and 13 in the chamber of deputies. As in his previous pres idencies, Balaguer's final term (1994 96) was an articulative presidency, characterized by more of the same in political terms. Balaguer did not repudiate any of his previous actions, nor did he try to modernize the institutional arrangements he had set up and maintained throughout the years. His presidency registered better economic performance with sustained economic growth, and the d There were also increases in public spending, including lavish public works projects (parti cularly in Santo Domingo), as well as increases in public sector wages, distributi on of land to the poor, and the construction of roads, schools and hospitals. Despite attempts to halt the deterioration of the fiscal accounts, the Balaguer administration m aintained ownership and operation of inefficient businesses and industries. In the run up to the 1996 presidential election, only a small fiscal surplus was maintained, keepi ng the public companies behind on their payments. right of veto over Congressional decisions (although any presidential veto could be overturned by a two thirds vote in both chambers), suspension of basic rights in times of emergency. The president appointed and removed government ministers and virtually all other high level public officials, although in pract ice the president has used his powers to appoint all sorts of officials from ministers to a gastronomic adviser (Interview with Anonymous DR effec tiveness largely depended on the discretionary appointments of the president. The president controled the

PAGE 248

248 consecutive term since the 19 78 elections, he had shifted an exclusively state led economy to a neoliberal one, which became stable, changing the engine of the country from agriculture to manufacturing and tourism, and improving conditions for tourism inve leadership project was to be statesman who brought modernity to the country. For him modernity meant infrastructure development, as opposed to a focus on human development. There was no sense of investing heavily in social areas, such as education and health care. Construction of schools and hospitals was a response to the necessity of keeping society calm, so that he could remain in power. Interestingly, he did not live a lavish life. He benefited relatives, friends and loyalists with favors and wealth, but his elf interest was power for the sake of power. articulative Balaguer reinforced and maintained the order and commitment s he helped establish and modify, but with a striking similarity to the authoritarian order prior to 1978 at the political level. He maintained programmatic and clientelist linkages that facilitated continuity (Hartlyn, 1998). The neoliberal policies he im plemented from 1990 onward would have predicted that social restructuring would transform the political order in place, but it did not happen. democracy, democratic procedure s and anything that had to do with transparency and were masterful ability to adapt to the times. As an illustration of the Latin American

PAGE 249

249 authoritarian tradition, Balaguer gove rned the country by creating and adjusting domination mechanisms that guaranteed his ruling, and when electoral democracy became the only game in town, he made sure he would remain influential in all Dominican matters. The system he created was based on cl ientelistic relationships with informal rules which s tress ed vertical aspects of authority and dominance and highlight ed the social aspects of loyalty and reciprocity. 47 This relationship assured that Balaguer could change the laws at his own convenience. Another characteristic of his rule was the lack of professionalism. The tactic he used to prevent anyone from acquiring sufficient experience to menace his interests was high turnover in state posts. The same can be said with regards to the private sector; Balaguer allowed limited leeway for initiative and dynamism and he made businesses flourish and decay because he made them dependable of the central government. All economic activity was depen dent on the state, when providing supplies, when trading in th e domestic and external market, and when requesting permits, thereby making the state the most important source of employment. Additionally, his view of a centralized state went hand in hand with the development of a powerful presidency and the highly auth oritative presidential regime he helped to establish. As he was the ultimate decision maker, he did not allow an effective system of checks and balances, Congress under Balaguer was a rubberstamp of the executive decisions (Espinal, 2004), and the Judiciar y was a formal authority that he used to his convenience to persecute and control politicians. There was no reliable guarantee of fair rules for political competition. In order to please the international community, Balaguer made the Dominican Republic see m 47 On clientelism and political dominance see Eisenstadt and Le marchand, 1981; Eisenstadt and Roniger, 1981; Auyero, 2000; Kitschelt, 2006: Kitschelt and Wilkinson, 2007; Stokes, 2001; Schrter, 2008.

PAGE 250

250 constitutional with an electoral democracy. He enacted a tailor made Constitution in 1 Electoral Board and the rules to become reelected. Not even in local elections did he allow the development of new leaderships. The culture of clientelism and favoritism needed to maintain his rule was reinforced permanently. W hen he saw his popularity declining he provided benefits and favors to the leaders of the organizations opposed to his policies. The Leonel Fernndez Articulative Presidency (1996 2000) articulative presidency. Even though his political identity and affiliation w ere different from his predecessor, upon taking office he enc ountered a strong political order that had a set of political commitments difficult to disregard. Fernndez was not a president who broke significantly with the past nor did he bring a whole new vision for the country H e believed that the path Balaguer c hose for the country was the correct one, his leadership project involved making history by continu ing to strengthen the economy and to provid e better conditions to attract foreign investment. administration focused on trying to change the order set up by Balaguer on his own terms, without altering the power structures. However, th e omnipresent influence of Balaguer frustrated the president who ended up surrendering to his power. As previously explained, th e combination of the Ce ntral Electoral Board (JCE Junta Central Electoral) as a professional election agency and domestic and international observers helped remove Balaguer and the advent of the first untainted elections created great expectations. The process between 1978 an d 1996 was certainly a step toward democratization, but it did not convert the Dominican Republic

PAGE 251

251 into a liberal democracy. Free and fair elections were not established until 1996 P reviously there had been no broad protection of civil liberties or levelin g of the political playing field for fair competition. Through clientelism, threat and intimidation, Balaguer kept dominating access to the state, the media, and other critical resources. Regarding the constitutional changes of 1994, the 1996 elections we re the first elections that could be held in two rounds. Once again, in the 1996 presidential campaign the three major parties presented candidates for the presidency. As Balaguer ormer vice president, as its candidate The former vice presidential candidate, who was party. 48 platforms were almost identical T hey were vague on the implementation of policies, but both promised to fight corruption and poverty and to end authoritarianism. 49 Leonel Fernndez was young and friendly, contrasting dramatically with his sical decrepitude and old style. He also contrasted with Pea, the veteran politician, whose rhetoric was powerful but whose identity and personal history were at odds with the ideal image of a leader that was created throughout the years in imaginary. Early in the campaign, it was evident that Peynado did not have 48 After the 1994 elections Bosch announced he would no longer run for president, but he remained being nominally the P election negotiations of 1994, he had already given up contro l of the party and was forced by his own comrades to retire from active politics (Moya Pons, 2010). 49 The PLD was originally a leftist party in the late 1970s and 1980s, but by 1996 it was backed by conservative elements of society. The PRD was the party with more tradition in the Dominican Republic, with factions that ranged from the radical left to the right. However, by 1996 it was a center right party that received support from all groups of society, while the conservative PRSC was on the right (Espina l and Jimenez, 1998; Morgan et al., 2011).

PAGE 252

252 Peynado attempted to have independent action that Balaguer was not willing to accept. 50 Balaguer had a personal issue with Pea, who in the 1994 elections was widely seen as the true winner, and up to 1996 remained his strongest political competition Political polls indicated that for most of the campaign the PRD candidate was the clear front runner. Balaguer and Bosch/Fernndez reached an implicit understanding to prevent a runoff victory of Pea, using the argument that the it was clear that Bosch was no longer in charge of the PLD 51 Fernndez wanted to captur e the presidency among other things, as a way to demonstrate that he coud be the leader who accomplished the presidency and offered to his party. At the beginning of the race Pea tried to focus on his social democrat cr edentials and the political ideology behind the policies he proposed B ut the 1996 elections were among the most anti Haitian, racist and anti black political campaigns ever experienced in the Dominican Republic. 52 The first round of the election failed to produce a winner with an absolute majority. As shown in Table 6 2, Pea placed first with 41.06 % of the valid vote against Fernndez who had 38.93 % ; Peynado, was a distant third with 15 % For the run off the PLD entered into a formal alliance with PRSC, which helped Fernndez to secur e a victory. The run off became a fight not on ideas but on identity and ancestry. Pea received all sorts of attacks due to his race and Haitian origin. 53 Balaguer used state 50 Interview with Anonymous DR #12. 51 Some interviewees assured that before the first round there was a secret accord between Fernndez and Balaguer with the sole objective of stopping Pea. 52 Interview with Anonym ous DR #3. 53 an ape as part of the program. The images where captured on TV and shown on national television (Interview with Anonymous DR #9)

PAGE 253

253 resources to mount a ferociou s campaign against Pea, who was forced to spend the rest of the campaign trying to assure voters he was not Haitian but Dominican. These actions effectively weakened Pea ing Fernndez. Balaguer made public st for anything in return. 54 As shown in Table 6 2 Fernndez won the run off with 51.25 % of the vote and Pea obtained 48.75 % of the vote. L eaders of the PRD u rged Pea to reject the results and file a claim for fraud, but deadly clashes between party sympathizers on election day, similar to those of 1994, made Pea concede the victory. 55 The results of the elections stressed the importance of the 1994 elite pact between the PRSC and PLD, while it prevented the PRD from gaining the presidency such an alliance weakened governance and inhibited Fernndez from carrying on a leadership project with freedom. Moreover, w hen Fernndez assumed office the PLD held the m inority in both houses of Congress, given that the constitutional reform of 1994 made Congressional and presidential elections non concurrent, thereby postponing congressional elections until 1998. For this reason, at the outset in his first presidency Fer the institutional order Balaguer championed. Fernndez I was an articulative president, who could not exercise power in his own right or articulate his own vision for the country. Fer notarized identity documents proving his place of birth, and in defending himself from accusations of outrageous voodoo practices, as opposed to Fernndez, who sent hop eful messages spreading his ideas about modernization of the state, including privatization of state companies and the end of corruption. 54 Two interviewees (Anonymous DR #5 and Anonymous DR #7) asserted that Balaguer did not ask PLD to return the favor f or his support, at least not before the run off. 55 By then Pea was sick, recovering from pancreatic cancer, and tired of the intense two year political fight with Balaguer (Interview with Anonymous DR #5).

PAGE 254

254 but the hopes were raised as he heralded a new generation of political leaders. He was the first president of the PLD, the party that occupied government for the first time in history. His discourse was optimistic and positive. Un like the presidential image Dominicans were used to, Fernndez image did not transmit fear. However, b ecause of his image and his lack of political experience, in comparison to Balaguer he was perceived as soft. At the beginning of his presidency, Fernn dez tried to break free from the commitments established by Balaguer. Balaguer had said he did not ask anything in return for his electoral support, but if Fernndez wanted to pass legislation he had to seek support from the PRSC. Fernndez order shatteri ng impulse was evident at his inauguration, at which he expressed his commitment to fight corruption and to discard authoritarian habits of the reports on the condition of t virtually all of them. 56 Balaguer ended his alliance with Fernndez not only because of the investigations but also because the new president had refused to allow Balaguer's party to continue controlling judicial appointments. 57 Wanting to avoid prosecution, PRD in Congress. The two parties distributed directive posts in the senate and the themselves. 58 Balaguer had virtual veto power over 56 Interview Juan Bolivar Diaz 57 Interview with An onymous DR #14. 58 Starting in 1996, the benefit for the opposition in the legislative coalitions has been to obtain the presidency of the lower chamber of Congress and the leadership of the Municipal League (Liga Municipal Dominicana, LMD).

PAGE 255

255 Fernndez, as he show ed from the start. It was difficult for the most powerful politician in contemporary Dominican history to let go of power and make himself vulnerable. ower broker and continued to pull strings. Fernndez saw his leadership project blocked and quickly learned that the encroached interests were too powerful for him to defy. Instead of fighting them, he focused on the most urgent issues which included laun ching economic reforms and imposing strong sanctions for drug trafficking. 59 At the time there were many scandals involving drug trafficking performed by Dominican mafias in the U.S., and the pressure from the U.S. Embassy to prosecute and break the mafias was enormous. 60 During the campaign Fernndez pledged to supervise tight fiscal and monetary policies as part of his program to reform and modernize the economy. His plan included privatization of state enterprises and reform of the tax and tariff system. With only three days in power, the Fernndez administration announced its plan for privatization and reform of the main state production corporation, 61 most of which had been operating with deficits for decades. Fernndez inherited a difficult economic situ ation. Balaguer left mounting international debts and a growing deficit I n his last years Balaguer had increased expending on his public works, particularly in Santo Domingo, and in the maintenance of the state electricity and sugar industries. Although B alaguer had opened the economy, and the country had continuous GDP growth since 1990, as 59 Personal inte rview with President Leonel Fernndez. 60 Interview with Anonymous DR #12. 61 Dominican Corporation of Electric Enterprises of the State (CDEEE Corporacin Dominicana de Empresas Elctricas Estatales), Sugar State Council (CEA Consejo Estatal del azucar), and the Corportation for the Promotion of the Hotel Industry (CORPHOTEL Corporacin de Fomento de la Industria Hotelera), as well as the twenty four companies that made up the Dominican Corporation of State Enterprises (CORDE Corporacin Dominicana de Emp resas Estatales).

PAGE 256

256 shown in Table 6 5 with an average of 3.2 % there were many state economic controls that distorted the economy, such as the subsidies for fuel and electricity. Fernndez asked the PRD and PRSC to join the PLD in an effort to pass necessary legislation for political and economic reforms and particularly for privatization. But a fter a short honeymoon period in Congress difficulties emerged. Fernndez announced a tax and tariff reform that caused problems with some of his support groups. To come to power Fernndez attracted some of the most important businessmen who backed his candidacy through campaign contributions, 62 but when he tried to raise taxes the business elite lobbied the PRSC and PRD to block his proposals in Congress. For months Fernndez sought to negotiate legislation with Balaguer, but days turned into weeks and then into months I were intended to frustrate Fern ndez. collapse at the beginning of 1997 but h is offer affirming efforts became evident when Fernndez found other ways to raise revenue without interfering with longstanding arrangements. Eventually he successfully implemented a campaign to increase tax collection by expanding the taxpayer universe, which initia lly produced impressive results, with government income f rom taxes growing 31 % at the end of his mandate. 63 In another instance, during the first year of his administ ration, Fernndez submitted a budget in order to kick start the administration, but Congress was unwilling to cooperate. In an unexpected tactical move, but Fernndez managed to acquire substantial resources for his discretionary spending. In the Dominican Republic, if a budget is not approved, the previous year's budget applies, 62 For an excellent study of political campaign contributions see Espinal and Jimenez Polanco (1998). 63 World Bank indicators.

PAGE 257

257 and any surplus resulting from higher tax revenue can be freely administered by the presidency. The Congressional majority thus had two choices: either approve the proposed budget, or reject it. Choosing the latter, provided the President with enormous funds for discretional spending (Keefer, 2002). Even though at times Fernndez found ways to outwit the opposition, he realized that the norms of affiliated leadership failed to guid e his presidential action when the old politics his predecessor established and the state institutions remained intact. From then on, Fernndez adopted a partial reform strategy and set his attention on the midterm elections, hoping to break the Congressio nal impasse. As many articulative presidents who step on others footprints, Fernndez did not have his own long term agenda T he pressing issues involved deepening of economic reform. 64 As his order creating impulse, h e managed to pass a number of laws tha t aimed to modernize the state and to dynamize the private sector in the Dominican Republic. In 1997 many relevant laws were approved with support of all parties: an bra nches, a general law of education, the creation of the General Office of Internal Revenues, a law that regulated the National Council of the Judiciary. Fernndez sought to advance the economic liberalization agenda to boost trade, intending to eliminate th e distortions created by the protectionist policies in place and to establish a strategy based on exports. In June 1997, Congress passed a law to partially privatize the electricity and sugar companies, following the Bolivian capitalization model. A follow up law regulating foreign investment passed in September 1997. Privatiz ation of state companies was a particularly long and difficult process and required a one on one 64 For a complete account of legislation passed during Fernndez I, see Espinal (2004)

PAGE 258

258 discussion with many of the opposition members of Congress, as well as a strong govern mental media campaign to explain privatization. 65 While most of these laws were not implemented effectively, the fact that the administration addressed the issue in the context of liberalization proves his commitment to the economic order in place started by Balaguer. If on one hand Fernndez tried to modernize the state by passing certain laws on the other h and h is administration sent mixed messages that undermined its own intentions of modernization. For instance, u pon his inauguration he announced sign ificant salary increases between 300 and 2,500 % for ministers and senior officials, resulting in outrage since most of the public sector wages remained low. During Fernndez I 31 out of 37 cabinet appointments were reserved for PLD partisans, and state jobs held by PLD sympathizers increased dramatically, to the extent that the PRD controlled Supreme Court issued a ruling stating that the Pr esident could not appoint lower level public officials by decree, as he was doing with national secretaries, and directors. 66 He followed the same behavior as Balaguer with regards to employing clientelistic practices. By doing this Fernndez became cozy with the existing arrangements, and undermined his chance of being a true orthodox innovator and at the same t ime an articulative president. Fernndez failed to be the leader who would shake things up and bring transparency and openness to the state. He failed to bring the state closer to the people I nstead, in a very quiet manner, he and his collaborators reprod uced the system set up his predecessor to benefit his own clientelistic network. In democratic terms he failed to represent the people and contributed to the disaffection 65 Personal interview with President Leonel Fernndez. 66 See El Nacional, December 5 1997.

PAGE 259

259 that has traditionally characterized the relationship between state and society in th e Dominican Republic. Having realized his real strength, Fernndez adopted a hidden hand style political style that became characteristic of both of his administrations. It consisted in seeming innocuous at the same time that he achieved governance for h is presidency. For instance, he protected Balaguer and the encroached interests indirectly, by letting time pass to avoid mak ing a decision and risking confrontation. Only six tion administrations. Fernndez could not bring Balaguer to justice and see the rest of his administration collapse with confrontations. He was to weak to bri ing Balaguer to justice Instead, his administration opened investigations of former officials close to Balaguer, causing only some resentment and irritation. Fernndez said that he would not interfere with justice whether the accused was Balaguer or any other former official, 67 arguing that the executive had to let the judicial system work, while knowingly 68 As Balaguer, Fernndez developed a personalistic presidential style, which was evid ent at home when he visited poor neighborhoods, hospitals, and schools and brought state resources, as if they were personal benefits he was granting. The difference lay in Fernndez personality and charm which constrasted sharply with nd imperious demeanor Fernndez sought to govern in a more inviting manner but without fostering true participation F or instance, he invited regular 67 Personal interview wit h President Leonel Fernndez 68 During the Fernndez administration only three military high ranked officers; Joaqun Antonio Pou Castro, Salvador Lluberes Monts and Jo s Isidoro Martnez Gonzlez, were arrested and condemned for participating in crimes committed before the transition to electoral democracy. There were no sentences for corruption or misbehavior (Interview with Anonymous DR #11).

PAGE 260

260 citizens who wrote letters to him to visit the presidential palace and spend time with the president, bu t he did not empower people to seek their own solutions. He also showed tolerance and approachability by meeting often with leaders of the opposition. His contact with the media was also distinct from his predecessor. H e went public permanently to try to g ather support. 69 Like many other articulative presidents, (e.g., George H. W. Bush immersed in the order created by Ronald Reagan), who were content to defend the existing order at home, or who recognize d they ha d to govern pledging to adhere to orthodoxy (Skowronek, 1993), Fernndez saw an opportunity to be creative in the foreign policy arena. Indeed, the most obvious order creating actions of Fernndez I were in foreign relations, which he personally managed. In contrast to Balaguer, who was known for hi s disdain for foreigners and who kept the country isolated for decades, Fernndez changed Dominican foreign policy by having a much more visible and active role for his country in Caribbean affairs and international forums, and by calling attention to inve stors to show how different the Dominican Republic was under his administration. Fernndez had a special interest in attracting foreign investment, impl ementing privatization and increasing trade. He also made several visits to other countries, signaling h is willingness to seek closer relations with the U S the E U and Caribbean and Latin American countries. Of particular importance was the shift in the relations with Haiti, 70 and a greements on tourism, taxes, postal service and cultural exchange were 69 For instance, at the en d of November 1997, Fernndez's response to rising food and gas prices was broadcast so the public could see working sessions of the Electricity Company (CDE) and the difficulties in reaching agreements. 70 During his first administration Fernndez traveled abroad 33 times. At the first Caribbean summit he attended in the Antilles in February 1997, Fernndez met with Haitian president Rene Preval. The media was attentive to the tense situation that such an encounter would entail, after Fernndez' predecessor held such a long hatred toward his neighboring country. In early 1997, the deportation of around 15,000 people of Haitian descent took place, and as a result the relations with Haiti were further deteriorated Yet Fernndez gave Preval a hearty hug, a ges ture that

PAGE 261

261 re ached. Fernndez and Preval discussed the lax border policing that allowed illegal immigrants and drugs to enter the Dominican Republic without any impediment from Haiti. For the rest of his term Fernndez personally managed relations with Haiti, having be come friends with Preval. 71 continental integration, as exemplified in the signing of the 1999 free trade agreement with the Caribbean Community and Common Market (CARICOM) and with Central America. Indeed, u in Caribbean affairs H e restored diplomatic ties with Cuba, participated in top level international meetings and hosted two international summits. 72 One of the most praised presidential act ions in the political arena was On November 1995 after three months in office, Fernndez forced high officials to retire on charges of insubordination and corruption O f the 70 generals in the Dominican military 24 gener als retired early. The president asked his military Secretary of state for the Armed Forces to arrange for the civilian Attorney General to question the high command, and when he refused Fernndez fired him as well for insubordination. The firing caused fe ar in the population and rumors of retaliation, but nothing happened. Fernndez talked to Balaguer and other stake holders, provoked a public discussion and successfully imposed civil rule over the military. 73 Other changes followed as Fernndez was able t o re structure the Dominican police and the judiciary by purging many corrupt officials (McClintock, 2007) If would previously have seemed unthinkable. Indeed it was an historical encounter, which began high level contacts with Haiti (See ES/politica1.html ). 71 Fernndez visited Haiti in June 1998; the historic visit was the first time after 65years that a Dominican president had made such a visit to the country. This event aimed to restore a more cordial atmosphere between the two countrie s. 72 The two summits sought to speed the process for the signature of the Central American and Caribbean Free Trade Agreements, one in 1997 and the second in 1998. 73 Personal Interview with President Leonel Fernndez and interview with Anonymous DR #1.

PAGE 262

262 transparency and trust are key elements for the creation of social capital in democracies, the appointment of new officers responded more to Fern count on loyal officers than his intention to modernize the military and the police. In the midterm elections of May 1998, as shown in Table 6 3, the PRD was the biggest winner with a large majority of legislative seats: 24 senators and 8 3 deputies and municipalities The PLD won 3 senate seats and 49 seats at the chamber of deputies. The PRSC gained 3 senators and 17 deputies. The PRD political sweep first and foremost was a rejection of the Fernndez administration that by then had alrea dy lost its shine. Citizens saw the PRD as the only political party that could offer change from the status quo. It was also a posthumous recognition of Pea, who died just before the election. Right after the elections, but before the new Congress assume d office, some PLD and PRSC sympathizers inside and outside Congress made public statements election. It was a way of seeking affirmation of the order, a clear attempt to allow Fernndez to be re elected, taking advantage of the circumstances while the PRSC held the majority in Congress The public statements and unofficial discussions in Congress, 74 if not a strategy to test public opinion and the media with the idea, were maneuvers to opp ose the upcoming PRD dominated Congress. 75 The PRD profusely opposed reelection, and civil society opinion leaders voiced their opposition on the media, strongly criticizing the re election proponents. When the proposal did not prosper, Fernndez and some PLD 74 I nterview with Anonymous DR #15 75 age nda. This phrase has remained in the political imagery every time Fernndez was perceived as too soft.

PAGE 263

263 leaders said publicly that he would not accept such a proposal and violate the constitutional order. After the elections, the Fernndez administration made a new alliance with the PRSC. Although old, blind, sick, and with less electoral support for hi s party, Balaguer kept his role as a powerbroker. He affirmed his political authority by offering the balance for a congressional ly powerful PRD. The alliance was another affirmation of the continuity in the policies and the politics that Fernndez expande d with his adherence to orthodoxy. It helped to solve some issues that Fernndez sought to address, in particular to continue the implementation of economic reforms. Indeed, the administration devaluated the currency in order to promote exports, a positive move since it allowed the government to pay external debt, accumulate reserves and improve The alliance bribed some PRD members to vote with them on crucial issues; ten August 1998 the PRD had already lost its absolute m ajority. With the scandal over bribes, the PRD retaliated and used i ts plurality in Congress to appoint a new JCE board dominated by PRD s ympathizers in August 1998. I n order to avoid another takeover of key public agencies by the PRD in January 1999 the alliance counterattacked with undemocratic maneuvers to wrest control and successfully pathizers to the Dominican Municipal League (LMD Liga Muncipal Dominicana). 76 When t he dispute was taken to court, the rulin g was favorable to the alliance, and Amable Aristy from the PRSC was 76 The police surrounded the headquarters of the LMD, which was the entity through which the central Government transferred money to municipalities. It wa s a powerful tool for parties to control expenses at local levels, even though it lacked autonomy until the Meja administration, when a new process for decentralization was launched.

PAGE 264

264 appointed General Secretary of the LMD. 77 Despite negotiations be tween the three parties, legislative activity was paralyzed, and the bitter dispute between the alliance and the PRD remained unresolved until the end of April 1999. In an attempt to legitimate his weak government and improve governability, the administrat the opposition, private sector, unions and civil society were called to establish nati onal priorities ( Dor Cabral, 1998) medium term agenda, since protests had badly damaged the image of the government and the President. The PRD refused to participate in the dialog, as it was perceive d as an attempt to distract attention while parties prepared for the upcoming presidential elections. Civil society was also reluctant to participate since the economic advances were not shared by most of the population. Constant criticism of the governm ent involved the enormous expenditure s on projects 78 and the Cyber park, as part of an attempt to move beyond traditional export industries Fernndez insisted o n turning the country into a computer services economy, in hopes of becoming a major Internet data processing center. 79 Indeed, those projects were twaddle if the point was to fight poverty. O ther project s that caused strong criticism w ere s to leave his own mark in the country in the form of infrastructure, including ren ova tion of the presidential palace and the boulevard in the center of Santo Domingo. He made explicit his dream to make Santo 77 Aristy became the manager of one of the largest budgets in the countr y, a budget that was supposed to be distributed among the 115 municipalities of the country. 78 Interview with Anonymous DR #1. 79 Fernndez launched the Cyberpark zone as part of his ambitious plan to expand the country's 43 free trade zones. It housed near ly 500 manufacturing assembly plants, with the creation of a high tech zones in Santo Domingo.

PAGE 265

265 capital. Undeniably, Dominicans saw their ca pital city Santo Domingo transformed as the construction of tunnels and vehicle overpasses were finished, but it was estimated that the administration paid more than 30 % excess for most of the public works focused in Santo Domingo. Fernndez was suc cessful in achieving steady economic growth as shown in Table 6 4. Indeed, the Dominican Republic grew at impressive levels, with an average of 7.9 % Increasing activities in the free trade zone, tourism and non traditional exports grew strongly alo ng with manufacturing. Mining and agriculture were the stragglers. Foreign investment rose, tourism boomed, and the Dominican Republic became the Latin American country with the highest GDP growth for most of his term. It was an economic boost after the de vastation of Hurricane Georges, 80 with growth and increase in government revenues mainly coming from the fruits of the campaign against tax evasion. Imports, telecommunications and a low oil price differential at the time weighed heavily in straightening th e economy. Not only did the o utward turning economy gr o w, but construction and commerce also increased activity. The economy also benefited from the remittances sent by Dominicans in the US. The administration was also able to accomplish privatization, wh ich brought fresh resources to the state. 81 The most important privatization was the Dominican Corporation of Electricity (CDE Corporaci n Dominicana de Electricidad). After years of 80 On September 22, 1998, Hurricane Georges devastate d the Dominican Republic leaving a death toll of nearly 350. It destroyed half of the power grid, damaged 70 percent of the country's bridges, and ruined 90 percent of the operating budget. International experts estimated $US 2.6 billion in damages ( New Yor k Times October 4, 1998; Miami Herald, May 17, 1999) 81 Dominican Mills (Molinos Dominicanos) were privatized in December 1998, airports were privatized in March 1999, and other state companies followed, including tourist developments, sugar and tobacco com panies

PAGE 266

266 failures in the provision of electricity, the corporation was divided into production, transmission and commercialization. 82 But despite efforts to make transmission more efficient, the demand for electricity outstripped the supply. Moreover there were no clear regulations on the pricing for electricity services leading to high prices for consumers and the government. Although the economy stayed temporarily fiscally secure with low interest rates, the economic success was short term, public finances deteriorated, as the oil subsidy became a bur den for the administration, and public expenditures for infrastructure projects rose. On the issue of reform of the judiciary branch, the accomplishments were only formal. In practice justice remained a promise, as the Fernndez administration experience d the same ills that plagued the previous presidencies. This problem is closely related to the last issue, the end of authoritarianism, as institutionalization, transparency and accountability were more part of the rhetoric than reality. Despite the econo mic growth, voters did not vote for Danilo Medina, the PLD candidate in the following elections, choosing the opposition PRD candidate instead. Corruption scandals had tainted the administration and the PLD lost credibility 83 The Fernndez administration s aid the allegations were politically motivated. The government's anti corruption unit acknowledged that millions of dollars had vanished from state companies, but the judiciary absolved the accused, all of whom held party 82 In April 1999, the distribution operations privatized 50 percent of the shares. In May 1999 the production part was privatized and large investments in new generators eased immediate problems. Transmission was set to remain under the Dominican Re public state. 83 The Program of Minimum Employment (PEME Programa Mnimo de Empleos), a fund intended to create jobs, and the Program for Neighborhood Action (PRODABA Programa Accin Barrial), a program to head off labor unrest, were among the most salien t and infuriating cases of corruption and cronyism during the Fernndez administration. The issue involved two cabinet members who were accused of the disappearance of millions in government funds. Analysts and critics argue that there were many more cases but they were less documented. (Several interviews, see also,21883,html )

PAGE 267

267 leadership positions in the PLD an d PRSC. 84 During the Meja administration the accusations were re opened and Fernndez, in the opposition, said on national radio pay or kill order to maintain governability and pea ce. 85 As in previous presidencies, public administration and finances lacked transparency during the Fernndez administration. Moreover, social policies (See Appendix Tables Economic Performance Variables) were weak, and Dominicans protested for lack of at tention. The most salient social policies of the Fernndez administration were related to education, where his administration engaged in massive spending, in comparison with previous administration. However, the educational system remained one of the poore modernization was to provide computers and breakfast for children. Both of which benefited the private sector. In general, public spending was biased toward tangibles that were easy to target to specific voters or groups of voters, such as jobs, buildings and highways. Public investment whose results were harder to grasp was not a priority such as higher teacher salaries, improved school curricula, or regulatory predictability (Keefer 2002). irst term was challenged with 300 strikes, including some with a death toll, a higher number of strikes and protests that in previous administrations. 86 84 Diandino Pea was Minister of Public Works, Simn Lizardo was the adminis trative secretary of the President, Haivanjoe Ng Cortias was a party member and No Camacho Ovalles was a businessmen with strong links with the PLD. 85 An investigative reporter, Juan Jose Ayuso (2002), wrote the book Pagar or Matar providing convincing p roofs of the deals. During the Fernndez administration, there were no sentences for corruption to any government official of his administration or of previous ones. 86 Particularly salient were the June 1997 and October 2007 protests; demonstrations over s kyrocketing food and gas prices controlled by the government took place. The strike was organized by a coalition of leftist groups, grass roots activists, public transportation drivers and students, and it reflected people's frustration with the changes th at were

PAGE 268

268 The protests paralyzed the Dominican Republic after much disappointment with the unfulfilled promises th at Fernndez brought into office when he became president. In the meantime, Dominicans kept risking their lives by taking boats toward Puerto Rico and e mmigrating to the US; by the end of 1997, 15 % of the Dominican population lived abroad with abou t a half million living in New York City. Justice and accountability were certainly not signatures of the Fernndez midterm elections but before the inauguration of the new congress, Balaguer exchanged the PRSC support in Congress for favors, either in the form of posts in the public sector, or through the de facto granting of immunity from prosecution for PRSC admini strations. The PLD PRSC alliance passed an amnesty law that exonerated all state employees from accusations and charges of corruption since 1978. As th ese actions demonstrate, Fernndez incremental changes in the political order in place actually strength ened it even more. Instead of defying the order, Fernndez put the order to his service. At the end of his administration The as Balagu support Fernndez candidacy guaranteed his own reign over Dominican politics. would have thought that he would not have to pay for it. The electoral pact, as well as the subsequent actions of the Fernndez administration, proved to be a convergence considered too slow in coming. The October protests were over chronic blackouts. In both occasions Fernndez promised to find quick solutions (Marsteintredet, 2010, i nterviews with Ramon Tejada Holguin, Juan Bolivar Diaz, Lozano).

PAGE 269

269 toward conservatism. Fernndez continued the direction of the economic policies, state management, and infrastructure projects, without upsetting established inte rests (Keefer, 2002). When Balaguer allied again with Fernndez after the 1998 elections, one more time Balaguer balanced the political forces in the country by counterweighing the PRD. As in the previous occasion Fernndez was passive as in his actions wi th Balaguer and did no undertake leading political initiatives. role as president was constrained not only by institutions but by his own inability to make credible promises of targeted use of state resources to the legislature, and by his unwi llingness to delegate discretion to potential competitors within his own party. 87 Because of these conflicts of interest among different players in the Dominican government, the legislature was unwilling to authorize, and the president preferred to decrease total government al use of resource s to low levels. Fernndez suffered from lack of credibility during most of his term, as shown in Figure 6 3, even with positive economic performance. From the start, his alliance with Balaguer made Dominicans suspicious of Fernndez, even when he enjoyed higher support than his own party. 88 To a large extent during his administration, freedom of speech and human rights were respected, but discrimination against Haitians and Dominican Haitians remained grave. Contestation was allowed and the whole political system started to open, but the three main parties gave little room for other organizations to succeed, even at the local level (Jimenez, 1999). Fernndez was able 87 Keefer (2002) a rgues that the Dominican Republic had considerably lower levels of spending than other comparable countries, because the president and the stalemate created in the competition with Congress generated downward pressures on spending. 88 Various interviews, pa rticularly with Anonymous DR #12.

PAGE 270

270 a long trajectory in key military posts, by effectively sending the military to the barracks. Fernndez was able to exercise fully his presidency since he could not run for re election. This is particularly important because his presidency, at the time, was a one shot opportunity. He actively supported the candidate of his party, Danilo Medina, but he did not spend the last year of his presidency focusing on the presidential campaign. Instead, one accomplishment of his last year was the establishment of h is own foundation, knowing that he could remain influential in Dominican politics, not because of his party or his presidential legacy, but by establishing a think tank that would provide a space to discuss public policy and other relevant issues through a private endeavor. The Hiplito Meja Articulative Presidency (2000 2004) Joaqun Balaguer of the PLD but a candidat e with no charisma. His closeness to Fernndez and other connections played an important role in the campaign. Despite the appearance of attempts to modernize the internal party structure of the PRSC though primaries, the party continued under the overwhel ming dominance of Balaguer. Hiplito Meja, was a respected politician and was part of the presidential ticket in 1994 with Pea. His campaign was based on strong personal contact of the candidate with voters. Meja was portrayed as foreman and fight seeke r, a disruptor of the established order who would shake things up. He was described as impulsive, business oriented and an intelligent politician but not a soft spoken one. He was not a cultured man, but of straightforward

PAGE 271

271 manners, often on the rude side. 89 He proved to be a good negotiator as he had to had personal ties with agribusinesses, and the Catholic Church, as well as strong support in the Cibao region. 90 His e lectoral program was in the tradition of the PRD, including social, political, and economic reform. He planned to remake the state through decentralization, institutionalization and efficient management of public finances. Meja, won the presidential elec tions by a large margin almost reaching the 50 % required for achieving the presidency. The second most voted candidate was Medina with less than 25 % of the vote. Furthermore, Balaguer had previously announced that this time the PRSC would not make a pact with the PLD to oppose the PRD, leaving no chance for the PLD to win a second round. The elections of 2000 were broadly considered free and fair. Meja assumed office with a strong mandate because of his landslide victory. The PRD had held a majority in Congress since 1998. Despite not having a formal alliance, Meja could depend on the PRSC for votes. Meja and Balaguer were personally close, and they formed a personal pact which maintained support of the PRSC deputies during the Meja admini stration I n exchange the PRSC obtained immunity from prosecution for PRSC misdeeds during its administrations, as we ll as some posts to be held by PRSC members. As with Fernndez, the pact with Balaguer guaranteed co ntinuity of the political order; hence his presidency was also articulative As Wiarda (1998) correctly points out, Balaguer was not only the ultimate decision maker, but even when 89 Several interviews. 90 Cibao is the second most important region in the Dominican Republic after Santo Domingo. It is also the most productive agricultural zone.

PAGE 272

272 not in power, he made other politicians respond to his actions and run around his circles. order shatteri ng actions consisted in trying to secure the possibility to remain in office by changing the constitution to allow immediate reelection. Taking rushed to present a proposal that would modify the constitution in order to allow the extension of the terms for both the presidency and Congress. Although the proposal did not prosper, the fact that the PRD wanted to change the constitution for its own benefit signaled a negative st art. Moreover, Meja himself appointed a commission to work on the proposal. In the economic arena, Hiplito Meja began his presidency by announcing austerity measures that included public during the campai gn for far reaching political, economic and state reform, during his first year in office he did not deliver much. Moreover his plan to give the private sector a larger role in providing health care services was not put into action, nor did his plan for t ariff reform. In his second year, Meja evened domestic and international oil prices obviating the need for fuel subsidies. In addition the Meja administration introduced tax changes to increase revenue, including increasing taxes widening the tax base, and imposing luxury taxes. Tax revenue grew, but no important reforms were passed and high levels of spending were maintained, especially on government and public works projects and reducing the f iscal surplus thereby repeating the patterns of the other PRD presidents. Those were affirming impulses, trying to establish his own clientelistic network

PAGE 273

273 using state posts. Meja pompously continued many of the infrastructure projects be gun under Balaguer, who died at the age of 95 in mid projects that were promise d to them (Keefer, 2005). By the beginning of 2002, the economi c decline was evident, due to the strong connection of the Dominican economy to the U.S., and after September 2001 tourism was reduced as well as remittances, foreign investment and the demand of Dominican products. In an attempt to reduce the external inf luence the Meja administration implemented expansionary public investment and appealed to multilateral institutions for loans. As a result interest rates escalated leading to a reduction in private investment. In the midterm elections held in May 2002, the PRD continued to dominate the Chamber of Deputies, where it held 73 of the 150 seats, and it also gained 29 of the 32 seats in the Senate. 91 support from other parties in the Chamber of De puties to pass constitutional amendments. The PRSC strengthened its support by doubling its seats in the Chamber of Deputies. On the other hand, the PLD which based its campaign on attacking the government without offering an alternative program, saw a red uction of its seats in both chambers. A few months later after the death of Balaguer, the PRD led Congress voted in favor of a constitutional amendment that reinstated consecutive presidential re election. 92 It was rumored that large payments were offered to several legislators in 91 The PRD also wo n 104 of 125 municipalities. 92 The other i mportant change was the reduction from 50 to 45 percent the minimum vote required to win presidential elections in the first round. The reform also included an increase in the chamber of deputies that went from 120 to 149 seats.

PAGE 274

274 exchange for their support. 93 extended domination of politics were revived. Having repea tedly insisted that he would not seek re election, the issue of the amendment created intra party conflict and PRD leadership, which historically had advocated for the elimi nation of immediate re election, regarding it as an important step toward greater democracy. 94 The reelection issue was minor compared to the banking crisis that aroused per iod of unprecedented fraud. The economic and financial problems with the bank turned into a major scandal when it was found that several politicians of all parties, management which had contributed for years to the presidential campaigns of the three most important parties in the Dominican Republic. 95 The government committed itself to clients. Th e losses were severe, calculated to be about two thirds of the national government's entire annual budget. 96 The banking crisis jolted Dominican society, igniting struggles between powerful families. More importantly, as the economy kept declining and Meja failed to deliver on his campaign promises, the public became skeptical of the entire political class. 93 Interviewees confirmed th e rumors. 94 Some PRD members of Congress, as well as party president Hatuey de Camps, were opposed to reelection. 95 BANINTER had been running a parallel software system removed from the scrutiny of the bank superintendence. Nearly 80 percent of the depos its belonged to one percent of the bank's customers, which included generals, government officials, and political figures. 96 http://w bankers linked to embezzlement.html?ref=leonel_Fernndez

PAGE 275

275 The liquidity in the economy as a result of the bailout, the capital flight, currency depreciation and growing inflation deteriorated fiscal and financi al accounts, forcing the government to seek financial assistance from the IMF to stabilize the economy. The Meja administration received an aid package but the program was suspended twice as the administration continued with ill practices. In a desperate move to control the situation, the government returned to price controls, creating scarcity as a parallel market emerged and inflation rose. Moreover, the Meja administration nationalized the electricity companies in an attempt to counteract for inflation By the end of 2003, all trust in the Meja administration was lost. In early 2004, the government committed again to the IMF economic recipes by introducing a series of new measures, including new temporary taxes and higher interest rates. Diligent appli led to increasing social tensions, protests and national strikes. To make matters worse the government also defaulted on payments and was unable to invest in electricity generation. The electricity blackouts that consistently h ad lasted many hours a day were hour blackouts became commonplace. In the last year of the Meja administration, Dominicans protested violently, and confrontations with police forces resulted in several deaths, particularly after the government announced new taxes and the end of subsidies for electricity. At the end of Meja term, vote rs had many reasons to be angry. T hey were discontent over the increase of the cost of living, the persistent long blackou ts and the bailout, as well as the rise in delinquency and corruption. 97 97 a friend get a job.html?ref=Hiplito_Meja ), and was also plagued with corruption scandals. Upon leaving office in

PAGE 276

276 98 during his first two years in office were obscured by the negative aspects of this presidency, particularly the economic mismanagement and the per ception of widespread corruption. Dominicans were fearful of the return to authoritarianism and abuse of power. The constitutional amendment allowing successive terms was certainly a setback for the democratization process. Moreover political pacts that Me ja established with Balaguer only reinforced the political state and society was virtually untouched. Dominicans were very negative over the prospects of reelecting Mej a and they expected change. It was no surprise that Leonel Fernndez would become president for a second term, as the PRSC did not provide a strong contender. Indeed, for the first time in history, the PRSC had a new presidential candidate, Eduardo Estrel la. But his candidacy did not appeal to Dominicans and in the pre election polls Estrella consistently placed third. 99 With no credibility, Meja criticized Fernndez, saying that Meja had granted immunity to Fernndez when he left power in 2000, but with the economic crisis, the 2004, he reported an increase in his assets to more than double than twice the amount when he first assumed the presidency. o_Meja 98 In 2 implement to cover pensions, health and workplace risks. Although redistributive policies were supposed to be tion started the government lacked the necessary resources to launch a successful program. 99 Since the death of Balaguer the PRSC struggled to ma i ntain its unity. In March 2003 the PRSC held its first primaries; Eduardo Estrella won 52 percent of the vote Peynado, the PRSC presidential candidate in the 1996 general elections, garnered 48 percent of the vote and refused to concede defeat, alleging fraud. After an internal investigation and appeals, the PR SC officially declared Estrella was thought to be a faade. The party was looking for identity and leadership, making the candidacy of E strella weak from the start.

PAGE 277

277 better past. With similar platforms, presidential experience, a track record of corruption in all parties, and the absence of truly representative parties, the election focused on trust and personalities. While Fernndez was serious, polite, calm and soft spoken, during the Meja administration Dominicans learned that Meja suffered from coprolalia, compulsive use of profanity, often uttering socially inappropriate, obscene words, and derogatory en sense of humor and buoyant personality, also worked against him. In times of deep economic crisis and deteriorating living conditions, Dominicans were looking for a dignified president who would tackle problems earnestly and offer proven solutions. 100 As shown in Table 6 2 voters supported Fernndez, with 57 % of the vote in the first round making a run off unnecessary. Meja received 34 % and Estrella 9 % of the vote. Fernndez received overwhelming support from Dominicans living in the United States with 73 % of the overseas votes. 101 The Leonel Fernndez Articulative Presidency (2004 2008) transition of leadership since 1978, with no claims of electoral fraud, and from that perspective it was a sign of democratic strengthening in the country. The results Fernndez could repeat the economic success of his first presidency. Voters expected Fernndez again to become an articulative president, as his campaign implied. Not only 100 Moya Pons (2010) p. 469. 101 The 2004 elections were also unique, since it was the first time that registered Dominican voters in the U.S. could cast overseas votes.

PAGE 278

278 did Fernndez occurred amidst turmoil in the other two parties. With the dea th of the three historical leaders, it was the first time that a real opportunity opened for new leadership B ut the parties were immersed in rivalries and intraparty divisions. 102 Thus although the challenges were huge, in political terms Fernndez new pr esidency had the advantage of having virtually no opposition. The PRD 103 and the PRSC 104 remained divided with factions pulling the parties in different directions, while Fernndez had a unified PLD under his leadership. In addition although the PLD formally held only two seats in the S enate and 41 seats in the chamber of deputies, Fernndez received the support of the 13 PRD Congressmen loyal to Hatuey de Camps, as well as the support of the 36 PRSC Congressmen. Without Balaguer, for the first time the count ry had space for new leadership and the possibility to detach from the ills of the past. However, Fernndez once again lost the opportunity to create a new way of conducting politics or to transform significantly the received orthodoxy. Fernndez assumed o ffice with the backing of the business community, because many of the elite former supporters of the PRSC shifted their s electoral base (Hartlyn and Espinal, 2009). Most importantly when he reassumed power, most of his cabinet members were recycled officials who held important posts in the past. Even though the 102 Pea G omez (PRD) died in 1998, Bosch (PLD) in 2001, and Bal aguer (PRSC) in 2002. 103 When Meja lost the election, he also lost grounding in the PRD. Even before the election, Meja dealt with opposition to his candidacy from of his own Vice president, Milagros Ortiz Bosch, his powerful minister of tourism, Fello Su 104 The PRSC had put Estrella forward but he was not the uncontested leader. The divided PRSC was able to remain deputies still had a margin for maneuver under the new administration.

PAGE 279

279 appointments, were reserved for his party; 41 out of 51 appointments were either PLD members or some former PRSC partisans who switched allegiance. 105 The government was stuffed one more time with party men who had been involved in corruption and nepotism s candals, it was a sign of the reactivation of a clientelistic network that supported the PLD and Fernndez, and also swelled the payroll. In general, Dominicans were skeptical of politics, because of the widespread corruption and poor economic management. 106 But Fernndez, whose first term in office was marred by scandals involving the disappearance of millions in government funds, 107 made fighting corruption one of his pillars. From the very start, Fernndez II faced major challenges. The country was experien cing its worst economic crisis in recent history (a mounting $6 billion debt, 32 % inflation rate, 33 % unemployment rate) and therefore waves of Dominicans headed to the ocean in boats seeking to reach the United States (Moya Pons, 2010). The Dominican Republic was close to a default spending it s resources in subsidies to electricity, and there was no immediate solution to the energy crisis. Right before his inauguration Fernndez held a meeting with Meja, in which they agreed to cooperate i n order to pass needed tax reforms. In his inaugural address, Fernndez announced fiscal austerity measures for his government and promised large cuts in borrowing, in government hiring, and in heavy spending, all of which had 105 Minister of economy Vicente Bengoa was the former banking superintendent, and Temistiocles Monts chief of staff in both administrations. Fernndez also appointed Daniel Toribio, the former finance minister, to the position of the chief executive of the Central Bank, and Alejandrina German, former secretary of the presidency, became minister of education. 106 See public opinion studies by Brea et. al (1995, 1996, 1998, 2002) 107 Some of t he most publicized cases were: $100 million PEME, lottery, Institute of Hydraulic Resources, Agricultural Bank, Secretary of State for Public Works, Secretary of State for Sports, Secretary of State for Public Health, Metropolitan Transportation Office, Su gar Corporation.

PAGE 280

280 characterized Meja's preside ncy. To restore confidence in the markets, he pledged not ould negotiate a new IMF aid package and release funds for immediate use. Effectively, in the first months of his administration Fern measures to stop the economic mess. His strategy to reassure Dominicans of his ability to restore macroeconomic stability and the international markets of capacity to provide a better business and investment environment was successful. It led to the return of flight capital, currency stabilization and recovery of the economy, and eventually to a reduction in interest rates and an increase in international reserves. order creating impulses led him to enlist top executives and professionals from among the close to one million Dominicans living in the U .S. States to engage in joint ventures in the Dominican Republic. It was a strategic move, to use his political and ec onomic support in the U S and thus helped the Dominican Republic speed the pending free trade agreement with the U.S. Indeed Fernndez' return to office helped to regain confidence not only on economic actors, but on politics as well. With support of his own party, the PRSC and some PRD Congressmen, he was able to enact important legislation to implement tax measures to increase government revenues with concomitant cuts in expenditure, including a 10 % reduction of the government pay roll and remov al of price controls. The result was almost an overnight reversal in fortunes. Once again the Dominican Republic experienced an economic upswing, linked to the U.S. economic

PAGE 281

281 recovery, 108 which provided tourists, remittances, and foreign direct investment. Some analysts contended that Fernndez was able to reap from the benefits of the economic recovery without any particularly brilliant strategy or effort of his own. 109 six months in comrades initially co operated with the government. Tax reform had passed quickly through Congress, since it was a pending issue from the Meja administration. The corruption alle gation involving some PRD officials of the former administration. As soon as the PRD felt threatened, it became an active opposition. Fernndez compromised his No o fficials from either his first or second administrationswere taken to justice (Morgan et al., 2009). In economic terms, during the first three years of Fernndez II, the Dominican Republic experienced strong economic growth of 7.42 % on average, as shown in table 6 5, well above the Latin American and Caribbean regional average. 110 With the international financial crisis in 2008, growth was about 5.3 % still above the regional average of 4.6 % Positive internal and external factors suppo rted this economic expansion. Besides implementing structural reforms in the first year, in the following 108 th attacks and its negative effects on the U.S. economy. The administration. 109 Inte rview with Anonymous DR #7, Anonymous DR #15. 110 World Bank Indicators (2010).

PAGE 282

282 years revenue collection and debt management were improved, the budgetary process was institutionalized, and the financial system was strengthened. Th e National Council of Private Entrepreneurs (CONEP Consejo Nacional de la Empresa Privada) openly supported Fernndez, particularly after his first year with the success of the stabilization. Later the CONEP lobbied actively and successfully for tax cuts. As in his his political affiliation at the center right of the political spectrum, another demonstration of the continuities in Fernndez II. Despite the positive tax changes, overall the tax base remained narrow, and public expenditures rose in order to subsidize mainly electricity and gas in large and poorly targeted subsidy programs. Problems with Haiti following the ouster of Jean Bertrand Aris tide by an armed revo lt in 2004 escalated in political crisis, and bilateral relations reached a low point in December 2005. 111 If this was a regrettable situation Fernndez was able to find other successful events to counterbalance his international image. For instance, the gov ernment adapted its legal framework in preparation for the Caribbean Free Trade Agreement DR CAFTA requirements by increasing taxes for income and for car imports. Even with a PLD minority, the Congress approved the legislation in December 2005 making onl y minor modifications. After years of negotiations and political turmoil, the long awaited Dominican Republic Central American Free Trade Agreement (DR CAFTA) was passed by the U.S. Congress on July 27 th 2005 and came into force in 2007. 111 The historically difficult relations with Haiti due to illegal emigration to the Dominican Republic and the deplorable conditions and treatment received by Haitians, received considerable attention in 2005. The Dominican government forced repatriations of Haitian migrants, including 4,000 people in May and another 1,000 people in August. Furthermore, human rights organizations denounced persistent violations to Haitians and Do minican Haitians. The latter were (and still are) denied citizenship.

PAGE 283

283 The Dominican Repu the supply and conservation of energy. However, these were not more than cosmetic changes since the improvement s did not meet the demand. The government continued to subsidize electricity throughout his second term however, by a strategic move that surprised Dominicans and international lending institutions Fernndez str uck a deal with Venezuela to buy oil at pre ferential prices in June 2005, 112 effectively freeing resources to be invested elsewhere. Fernndez also promised to increase social protection by improved targeting of social programs, but putting a stop to rising violence and organized crime required more than good intentions. Another pledge at the start of Fernndez administration was war on crime, and in particular on drug trafficking. Armed clashes between drug gangs and drug shipment seizures became common To achieve c congressional support for his re forms, Fernndez had to renege on his pledge to combat corruption although t he U.S. withdrew visas to several Meja collaborators that held important positions during his offi cials A s a trade off, Dominican courts dismissed 80 % of narcotics cases on technicalities. 113 General crime which increased sharply between 2004 and 2005, has been contained somewhat since 2006, in part by the public safety programs (Morgan et al., 2009) In November 2005, it was discovered that $US 380 million were misappropriated at the fifth largest bank, Banco Progreso, by a former president of its board of directors. 112 Venezuela supplied up to 75 percent of oil to the Dominican Republic during the Meja and Fernndez administrations. 113 Interview with Anonymous DR #14.

PAGE 284

284 This renewed concerns about internal controls and corporate governance were larg ely ignored by the administration Moreover, the vulnerability of the public finances was put in evidence again when it was revealed that the government engaged in heavy spending up to the midterm elections. Fernndez did not exercise his leadership force fully; he preferred a non polemic presidency, in which his ministers had considerable leeway. The positive economic policies and knowing that both the PRSC and PRD were split and weakened with intraparty rivalries, Fernndez strengthened his leadership. He saw an opportunity for the PLD to increase its share in Congress and in the provinces, reversing its minority in Congress in the midterm 2006 elections, 114 Seeing their prospects for votes reduced, the PRD and part of the PRSC leadership made an historical alliance forming the Great National Alliance to stop the PLD in the 2006 midterm elections. However ano ther significant faction of the PRSC openly the PRD and the PRSC, as they saw their numbers of S enators and Congressmen both reduced. The alliance itself was perceived as a mere political strategy to get votes, with no coherent discourse. Several leaders of the PRSC had left the party before the ele ctions, leaving the PRSC even more weakened. In the Congressional and local elections of 2006, the ruling PLD and its allies formed the progressive block. They were re warded with a comfortable majority in both houses of Congress. The PLD received 52,4 % of the votes, with 96 deputies and 22 114 In preparation for the midter m elections, the PRSC held primaries in June 2005. As a result, Federico Antn Batlle became the new party leader. However his leadership did not unify the party, and in fact it created more animosity between the leadership faction and some Congressmen. In the same month the PRD also held its primary elections, electing Ramon Albuquerque as the party leader.

PAGE 285

285 senators; the PRD held 60 deputies and 6 senators, and the PRSC was third with 22 deputies with 4 senators. The midterm elections strengthened governability in the second half of Fernndez II and provided a unique window of opportunity to engage in solving the building institutions, and improving competitiveness in the investment climate. With the strong performance in the elections Fernndez wa s guaranteed an easier time, but wasted a unique opportunity to make important changes. The enacted reforms were not so much of Fernndez making or a carefully planned strategy. Rather, they originated in the need to prove that the country had sound econom ic management in order for CAFTA to enter into force. A few months after gaining Congressional majority, in October 2006 Fernndez announced he would introduce constitutional reform. His proposals included removing the limit on holding presidential office to two terms, making Congressional and presidential election s concurrent, and extending legal rights for citizens. A series of public consultations were held, but there was considerable controversy in the media and in public opinion, 115 particularly over pr esidential re election. None of the proposals passed before the end of his term, but the effort revealed a less democratic side of Fernndez. In his first administration, he had a chance to change the constitution for his own benefit with the support of th e PRSC, but he did not, thus retaining his democratic credentials intact. However, his proposal in Fernndez II revealed his real leadership project to retain power for himself. 115 Various interviews including a personal interview with President Leonel Fernndez.

PAGE 286

286 During the second half of Fernndez II he devoted an enormous amount of tim e and effort to his reelection and to constructing infrastructure with his own signature. In December 2006, the PLD majority in Congress approved a fiscal reform to increase revenue by raising taxes on gasoline, vehicle licenses, insurance services, casino s and lottery, banking transactions and alcohol and tobacco. The reform was opposed by the PRD and PRSC, as well as by the business community, which up to that point was supportive of Fernndez. However, unmoved by lobbyists and critics, Fernndez made an agreement with the IMF in which fiscal consolidation was prioritized and the financial sector was set to be strengthened. The IMF was concerned about the lack of attention to state and institutional reform, especially when it became evident that there wer e institutional weaknesses in the banking superintendence. With persistently high oil prices and the policy of fiscal transfers to the electricity sector the budget was out of the agreed target range, forcing the administration to cut spending items for p ublic sector in 2006. Part of the reform included a change in the state budget management that reduced the share of resources controlled by the president from 20 % to 15 % Although this move was supposed to reduce the arbitrary allocation of p ublic spending, under special ill defined circumstances when Congress was not in session, the president could move resources between different spending items by decree. In practice, the president continued to control the budget, as there was virtually no o pposition to oversee the executive. Protests took place in early July and again in October 2007, concerning the lack of attention to social needs, low wages, high gas prices, rising prices of basic products and ties with the IMF. Social progress in areas such as education and health lacked

PAGE 287

287 priority and necessary presidential support. In discourse, education was the area that the President seemed to care for the most, but spending on education as a percentage of GDP was still very low, 116 reaching 2 % 117 A number of initiatives were launched to improve public education, including scholarships and awards, the installation of computers in nearly every school, the creation of the Cyber Park, and the promotion of reading skills through the so called Reading Olympics. Public school enrollment rates have improved in recent years and as of 2008 they were high by regional standards, ranking s (PNUD, 2008). A conditional cash t ransfer (CCT) program that targeted the poor was highly regarded for providing poor families with targeted subsidies. 118 The conditional cash transfer program called Solidaridad, was created in 2005, aiming to rationalize social expenditure towards efficien t and effective programs. Using the PLD control of Congress, by the end of 2006 a new electoral board (JCE) was appointed by Fernndez. It was perceived as relatively independent, but with the control by the executive and legislative there was suspicion of the JCE, particularly since the battles could move from Congress to the JCE as ground for political party pressures. Only a few months after the 2006 midterm elections, the main political parties in the Dominican Republic started preparing for the 2008 presidential election, and both PRD and PRSC held primary elections. As in the past, intraparty personal rivalries and 116 During the Meja administration, a law mandating spending on edu cation of at least 4 percent of GDP was passed. Nevertheless, none of the Meja and Fernndez administrations obeyed the law. 117 PNUD 2008: 218. 118 See World Bank Country Partnership Strategy 2009 Dominican Republic.

PAGE 288

288 struggles continued. 119 As opposed to the first half of Fernndez II, Fernndez need ed to prove himself A strong gain in the midterm elect ions would lead to Fernndez nomination as a given. Since the three party platforms varied little and personal clienteles were key to political competition, intra party competition also arose in the ncy, challenged him in the Congressmen and at the grassroots level, whereas Fernndez had greater backing among rank and file party members and the general public. It became a bitter race as Medina denounced the use of state resources in favor of the incumbent President, and he eventually realized that the party could not fight back the p ower of the state in the Medina declared. 120 Fernndez won 71.5 % of the party vote, with the remainder going to Medina. Fernndez retained his party favor through the activation of a clientelisti c network directly connected to him. Starting in May 2007, Fernndez became focused on his reelection instead of making significant changes, as reflected in the expansion of public expenditures. Even though during the first three years government spending remained low in comparison to other countries, it was higher than in other administrations, as shown in Table 6 5. In 2006 and 2008, government increased expenditures leading up to the midterm and presidential elections, respectively. Fernndez increased public expenditures in projects 119 ldonado, who was a minister of Meja, became the presidential candidate. The party became divided, as Milagros Ortiz Bosch was supposed to be the candidate according to the intraparty deals when Meja became the candidate in 2000. The PRSC elected the Dom inican Municipal League President, Amable Aristy, as its presidential candidate on June 2007with 55 percent of the vote over Eduardo Estrella. The election was controversial, as Estrella denounced the outcome as fraudulent, and eventually left the party. 120 republica/2007/5/6/11957/Danilo Medina admite que el presidente Leonel Fernndez gano primarias PLD

PAGE 289

289 that were highly visible and did not necessarily resolve urgent matters, in particular the construction of the Santo Domingo metro, which he saw as a symbol of his legacy in modernizing the country. 121 Fernndez was accused of focusing more on constructing a subway than on leading the disaster reconstruction efforts after two deadly hurricanes in 2007. 122 Fernndez articulative presidency experienced economic rebound, while addressing crime, corruption, the chronic electricity crisis and improving the quality of life for its citizens became increasingly necessary. Progress in the latter areas was much slower than expected. Fernndez policies were cautious, orthodox and market friendly, but his successes were overshadowed by corr uption scandals that the president denied, only to later acknowledge and even justify. As in Fernndez I, his second administration was plagued by cases of corruption and clientelism. For example, the case of watered caugh t the media attention as one of the most outraging corruption scandals. The education minister, Alejandrina German, a close friend and party colleague of Fernndez, was asked to resign, but she did not receive any punishment. 123 121 By February of 2008, a single line of the metro system in Santo Domingo with only two working stations was tested. The project was pushed to be finished before the elections. Fernndez announced that if reelected he would build a second li ne. The initial $470 million estimate of the cost of the project spiraled to nearly $750 million according to some and much higher according to others. No transparent information has been released over the total cost of the first line of the Santo Domingo metro. 122 On the last days of November 2007and after heavy rain, Hurricane Noel hit the island, causing an estimated $30 happened, when tropical storm Olga hit the Dominican Republic causing floods in highly populated areas. During the storm a dam was negligently opened, devastating extensive areas and killing more than 30 people. A report absolved the government of any responsibility, after being heavily criticized for the lack of immediate action, poor preparation, and loss of life and property. The report was criticized because the commission responsible was appointed by the government, and it was clear that it served to deflect criticism. 123 In fact most of the scandals did not involve any kind of penalty for those government officials or politicians involved. Such was the case of Sun Land in which promissory notes for $130 million dollars were given by the state in exchange for public works that were never delivered. The contract was cancelled after the media discovered the obscure deals, but the state paid what it supposedly owed to the company as stipulated in the contract (see,

PAGE 290

290 ive presidency was no differently led than previous administrations including his own. Both the political order and the commitments that he was affiliated with were resilient. In his second administration, the underlying structures of the political order were much stronger than in Fernndez I. Having mastered the art of politics in his first administration, and being supported by the established commitments, he had no interest in changing the status quo. Fernndez did not try to fight the establishment an d he did not upset the dominating interests. To the contrary, he took the commitments to a level of making the fears aroused during the Meja administration disappear. In his second presidency, Fernndez showed commitment to free markets, governability bas ed on clientelism and a subsidizing state, especially for energy consumption. The product for each of these features was supposed to be economic growth strongly linked to international markets such as CAFTA. Political stability was based on the expansion o f clientelistic networks and a culture of patronage that included modern tools such as social programs for the poor like Solidaridad. Social because they had an inherent value, but because they were helpful in avoiding the These programs provided evidence that the state was working toward the protect ion of consumers and industries from the rising oil prices In addition, public administration high us e of o paque accounting and public expenditure practices serve d vested interests such as the use of public contracts to reward political allies and financial contributors resulted in inefficient public resource use and corruption. htt p:// ). Moreover, it was a common practice in Fernndez first and second administration fro business to to overcharge for goods bought by the state, such as the Project E Portal Dominicano, software for Imposdom, tec hnical equipment for the National Police, and Tucano planes for the military (see p/news/1188/56/La corrupcion se acrecienta en los 10 anos del presidente Leonel Fernndez.html ).

PAGE 291

291 Clientelism was the principal m eans of managing state resources, benefiting the administration was nepotistic; he rewarded friends, supporters and party comrades instead of seeking the most qualifie d people for the job. As Kitschelt and Wilkinson (2007) theorize, in the Dominican Republic clientelism is considered part of the political culture and the way the state relates to society. As Balaguer and Meja, Fernndez and even ordinary Dominicans did not consider the patron client relationship as clientelistic, as a quid pro quo exchang e of scarce and desirable goods. I nstead they interpreted it in flowery terms as an enactment of community relations and civic solidarity. Discus sion The third wave o f democratization in the Dominican Republic occurred as part of the clientelistic political order. This chapter provided an account of the advancements and setbacks of democratization in the country as a result of the role of each of the successive preside nts in the duration and the intensity of the life of the political cycle. Specifically, in this chapter the two non consecutive presidencies of Leonel Fernndez explain how his actions contributed to the continuation of the clientelistic political order. Since 1978 the politics of articulation was clear in six out of the eight maintaining the continuity that characterizes the Dominican Republic. The changes that too k place since then have been incremental as opposed to radical or significant. There were battles that Balaguer lost, such as the Jorge and Guzman presidencies. Both establis hed commitments but they faced a resilient order, and for these reasons their presidencies were preemptive. Their authority was repudiative of the institutional and

PAGE 292

292 ideological supports that the old establishment maintained. Not only were their presidencie s weak in relation to the formidable set of institutional developments that were strengthened and consolidated by Balaguer, but there was no orientation among the citizenry for radical change and the ruling elite was quite satisfied with the situation at the time as he personified the establishment, and he orchestrated a political order that was strong and resilient to political and social pressures .P olitical actors who pressed for change were co opted by Balaguer through clientelistic practices that characterized his rule. The presidencies of Leonel Fernndez I and II and Hiplito Meja are also considered articulative because they were characterized by the absence of significant change both at t he level of affiliation with the ruling interests and support for the basic tenants of the order. The case of Fernndez suggests that leadership can be constrained by other acked a vision for democratic advancement. Pushing for the participation of the historically excluded and fostering debate w ere not in his agenda. In his first term, Fernndez leadership limited itself to minor actions that did not question the status quo In fact Fernndez actions contributed to make the clientelistic order stronger as he reproduced the practices employed by Balaguer and set up his own clientelistic network. As in his order in place and continued to support and be supported by the established commitments. He did not break with the attachments he established in his first presidency.

PAGE 293

293 tw o presidencies demonstrate that re elected leaders are not necessarily pos political order whose guiding ideas and organized interests do not have a referent in the population, the ill oriented political order becomes hazardously stronger, delaying even more the pos sibility of democratic advancement. In a case like this, presidential interventions are negative for the politics of country as they den y the authentic representation of interests and participation. As Mitchell (2009) correctly points out, despite the vulnerability to external factors, the country has show n a remarkable ability to maintain certain internal aspects that have reinforced its particular brand of political system, namely clientelistic with vertical decision making a nd cooptation, but no new mechanism for conflict resolution. Politics in the Dominican Republic seem to be maintained by groups that favor the status quo. The patrimonial nature of the state that started with Trujillo (Hartlyn, 1998), has been maintained b y all successive administrations. Furthermore, all of the Dominican parties have employed clientelist strategies and maintained clientelistic networks, as Dominicans see their demands somehow met though the network, with the popular sector remaining weak a nd with few chance s to initiate change from below. All administrations faced popular discontent and all confronted the masses, but the popular sector has never been strong enough to organize and become a serious threat. Dominican society is extremely compl ex, and their living conditions. Even though all Dominicans interviewed for this dissertation were open to frank conversations about sensitive topics, the idea tha t the government offers

PAGE 294

294 rewards by making clients out of citizens was not outrageous to most of them. There are certainly some Dominicans eager for change and the political system did not seem to be ready for change but there is no sign of the burning popular unrest which has challenged governments elsewhere in Latin America.

PAGE 295

295 Table 6 1. Dominican Republic Presidents, types of presidencies and political orders (1978 2008) Years President Type of presidency Political order 1978 1982 Antonio Guzman Preemptive Clientelistic 1982 1986 Salvador Jorge Preemptive Clientelistic 1986 1990 Joaqun Balaguer Articulative Clientelistic 1990 1994 Joaqun Balaguer Articulative Clientelistic 1994 1996 Joaqun Balaguer Articulative Clientelistic 1996 200 0 Leonel Fernndez I Articulative Clientelistic 2000 2004 Hiplito Meja Articulative Clientelistic 2004 2008 Leonel Fernndez II Articulative Clientelistic Table 6 2 Dominican Republic Vote s hare by party in presidential elections (1978 2008) ( in percentages) PARTY 1978 1982 1986 1990 1994 1996 (I) 1996 (II) 2000 2004 2008 PLD 1.11 9.82 18.37 33.77 13.12 38.93 51.25 24.94 57.11 53.83 PRD 51.69 46.70 33.46 22.96 39.41 41.06 48.75 49.87 33.65 40.48 PR(SC) 42.65 36.55 40.51 33.48 41.89 15.00 24 .60 8.65 4.59 PRI 7.01 2.29 1.02 0.11 0.04 Other parties 4.55 6.92 7.68 2.77 3.29 3.99 0 0.59 0.48 1.06 Source: Junta Central Electoral (JCE)

PAGE 296

296 Table 6 3. Dominican Republic Seats by party (1978 2010) PLD PRD PR(SC) PRI TOTAL 1978 Deputie s 0 48 43 91 Senators 0 11 16 27 1982 Deputies 7 50 63 120 Senators 0 17 10 27 1986 Deputies 16 48 56 120 Senators 2 7 21 30 1990 Deputies 44 33 41 2 120 Senators 12 2 16 30 1994 Deputies 13 57 50 120 Senators 1 14 15 30 19 98 Deputies 49 83 17 149 Senators 3 24 3 30 2002 Deputies 41 73 36 150 Senators 2 29 1 32 2006 Deputies 96 60 22 178 Senators 22 6 4 32 2010 Deputies 105 75 3 183 Senators 31 0 1 32 Source: Junta Central Electoral (JCE); Jos n gel Aquino (2010); Espinal (2004) Table 6 4 Dominican Republic Electoral data in presidential elections (1978 2008) Year Registered Voters Increase RV Valid Votes Null Total Cast Absent 2 In percentages 1978 2,178,562 94.94 5.06 80.05 24 1982 2 ,456,757 11.32 95.25 4.75 78.23 26 1986 2,933,333 16.25 96.22 3.78 74.83 28 1990 3,223,333 9.00 98.05 1.95 61.21 40 1994 3,506,977 8.09 97.85 2.15 87.88 14 1996 (I) 3,735,443 6.12 98.40 1.60 79.03 21 1996 (II) 3,740,843 0.14 99.38 0.67 76.96 23 2000 4,251,218 12.01 98.70 1.30 76.14 24 2004 5,020,703 15.33 98.82 1.16 72.84 27 2008 1 5,764,387 12.90 99.34 0.66 71.36 29 Source: Junta Central Electoral (JCE) ; 1 JCE Boletn no. 9, no.10; 2 Hartlyn & Espinal (2008); Mitchell (2009)

PAGE 297

297 Figure 6 1. Dominican Republic Personal opinions of Joaqun Balaguer (1991 2008) Source : Hamilton Campaigns Dominican Republic, 1991 1996

PAGE 298

2 98 Figure 6 2. Dominican Republic Personal opinions of presidential performance (1991 2008) Source: Hamilton Campaig ns Dominican Republic, 1991 2008; CID Gallup Opini n Pblica Repblica Dominicana #17 Figure 6 3. Dominican Republic Personal o pinions of Leonel Fernndez (1994 2008) Source: Hamilton Campaigns Dominican Republic 1994 2008

PAGE 299

299 Table 6 5 Dominican Republic Economic performance variables (in percentages) (1990 2008) Year GDP growth GDP growth per capita Deficit (of GDP) Public expenditure (of GDP) Inflation growth 1990 5.80 7.80 0.61 10.86 80.28 1991 0.90 1.10 0.82 7.42 7.87 1992 8.00 5 .90 2.61 9.76 5.16 1993 3.00 1.00 0.18 12.35 55.39 1994 4.20 2.20 0.38 12.26 14.32 1995 4.80 2.90 0.82 11.09 9.22 1996 7.30 5.30 0.23 11.43 3.95 1997 8.20 6.30 0.76 12.12 8.37 1998 7.40 5.60 0.68 11.81 7.82 1999 8.00 6.20 0.35 13.14 5.10 2000 7. 90 6.20 0.88 12.44 9.02 2001 4.00 2.40 0.34 14.17 4.38 2002 4.30 2.70 0.05 14.53 10.51 2003 0.25 1.76 1.07 11.97 42.66 2004 1.31 0.19 0.54 14.65 28.74 2005 9.26 7.68 0.14 15.84 7.44 2006 10.67 9.10 0.02 16.14 5.00 2007 8.48 6.90 0.64 17.09 8.88 2008 5.26 3.70 3.78 19.63 4.52 Source: Economist Intelligence Unit

PAGE 300

300 CHAPTER 7 ADERSHIP STYLE actions by looking at: a) his reactions to political constra ints in his environment, b) his openness to information and c) his motivations for seeking his positions. In order to do this I use a leader to assess his leadership styles. A s stated in Chapter 2, motivations, perceptions and worldview hold significant importance for the politics of new democracies when the person in the highest office in the country makes decisions that affect current politics as well as democratization pros interests. was explained, this chapter adds to the analysis of political and secular time, introducing personal level variables in order to u trait analysis. When the three aspects, political time (structural patterns), secular time country has a better chance at deepening democratization. A necessary caveat is to remember that the concept of leadership that guides this dissertation includes moral and ethical arguments that put the search of common good above the personal. This chapter demonstrates the importance his actions during both of his administrations. 1 1 that include one w ith the President, and the rest with people with whom Fern ndez had long term personal contact They include elected and appointed scholars and analysts. Other sources were official speeches, public app earances, Fernndez published articles and press interviews, and special reports.

PAGE 301

301 an opportunity to understand his actions and observe an example of political learning/over learning. About Leone l Fernndez Leonel Fernndez Reyna was born in the neighborhood of San Carlos in Santo Domingo in 1953. During his early years he lived in the neighborhood of Villa Juana, a low middle class neighborhood with his family. His father was an army officer, a nd his mother a school teacher.At the age of nine, the Fernndez family moved to the Bronx, New York. As many other immigrants, Dominican families looking for a better future. His mother worked as seamstress and nurse's aide and Fernndez attended p ublic School in the city of New York. The young Fernndez used to play baseball and basketball and enjoyed American pop culture. He held a U.S. green card until at least 2002. 2 He returned to Santo Domingo at the age of sixteen and studied law at the Autonomous University of Santo Domingo (UASD Universidad Autnoma de Santo Domingo). participation in political events. In 1978 he graduated a s lawyer and worked in his prof e s sion in journalism and as university professor. In his law practice at a legal firm he specializ ed in civil law, and he also worked at various courts of the Dominican Republic. In 1979 h e started teaching various courses in social sciences, law and phi losophy at UASD, as well as in other foreign universities such as FLACSO (Facultad Latinoamericana de Ciencias Sociales). 2 The Dominican Republic allows dual citizenship due to the large Dominican population living in the US, and traveling back and forth between the U.S. and the Dominican Repub lic. Unlike other countries in the Dominican Republic it is not an issue to hold a green card, not even for high profile politicians like Fernndez.

PAGE 302

302 Although some sources highlighted his participation along with Bosch in the founding of the PLD in 1973, 3 there is no evidence he was an active member of the PLD. I n fact he was very young to be of salient influence. Only after graduation did he bec o me an active member of the PLD, first as committee secretary in charge of distributing propaganda, then a central committee member in 1983, and a member of secretary and secretary of foreign affairs. In addition Fernndez worked as chief editor of the party magazine and newspaper. In the tradition of Juan Bo s c Fernndez published three books: The United States of the Caribbean: From the Cold War to the Reagan Plan (Los Estados Unidos del Caribe; de la Guerra Fria al Plan Reagan), Roots of the Infringed P ower ( Raices de un Poder usurpado ) (1 991) and New Paradigm ( Nuevo Paradigma ) in 1999. He wrote newspaper and magazine articles on communication, culture, history and law. In 1994 Fernndez was part of the presidential ticket when Juan Bosch r a n for the Presidency and selected him to accompa ny him as his vice americanism/imperialism posture was softened by Fernndez who had great sympathy for the U.S. and its culture, and his spoke n English resembled more a person from the Bronx than a native Spanish speaker. In April 1995 Fernndez was chosen by the PLD to become its presidential candidate. In the mid 1980s Fernndez married Roco Domnguez; they had two children: Dominican lawyer Margarita Cede o, they have a daughter Yolanda Amrica. 3 http:/ /

PAGE 303

303 Leadership Style Constraints at two traits: the belief that he can control events and his need for power. n his control and influence over events As opposed to Gonzalo Snchez de Lozada and Alan Garca, who in Chapters 5 and 9 respectively, are described as high in believing in their abilities to control and influence events, Leonel Fernndez was low. Thus he enabled others, either followers or officials working for him, to make decisions or to act as emissaries. From the start of his rise to leadership positions Fernndez was aware of his inability to control events. This self awareness worked in his favor, a s he was regarded as a moderate and innocuous by his party fellows. Juan Bosch, the historical leader of the PLD, saw Fernndez as a good running mate for the 1994 presidential elections as ndez did not step over anyone nor did he seem over 4 Fernndez let other factors play a role in his rise to national politics F or instance his E nglish language skills were important assets for the PLD at the time of his candidacy, as he was one of the few members of the party who could relate to the U.S. and the Dominican diaspora in the US. Moreover, he was articulate and able to communicate his controversial past 4 "A quien no hago un bien, tampoco hago un mal" soluta/elpepiint/20040518elpepiint_18/Tes

PAGE 304

304 as well as his non controversial behavior gained him the favor of th e PLD leadership, as well as Bosch, the Catholic Church, and of the U.S. Embassy. Fernndez provided a 5 and was a better choice for vice president than the other party leader, Danilo Medina. 6 Another display of his lack of interest in controlling events occurred in the 1996 elections when Fernndez let his party choose his running mate, Jaime David Fernndez, instead of imposing someone himself. Even when he became the presidential candidate he knew he could not control his party. At this point in time Bosch was practically retired and ill. While other party leaders were active in the politics of succession, Fernndez remained calm. After stepping aside to give the party a chance to win the presidency Danilo Medina, the other competitor, helped Fernndez gain the spotlight and took charge of the party operations and the running of the campaign. Medina effectively became the PLD strategist for the campaign, as well as the architect, along wi th Fernndez, for the future pact, formally established in June 2 1996, right before the run off between the PLD and the PRSC. 7 Another example of Fernndez ease at letting events unfold without his intervention occurred d uring the fi rst round of the 199 6 elections when Fernndez mildly B ecause of its timid criticism the PLD clearly became an accomplice of the PRSC. The immediate aspirations to win the 1996 election became 5 Bosch was one of the founders of the PRD while living in Cuba and had identifie d with Marxist views. Throughout his life Bosch developed a political doctrine against imperialism, in a clear quarrel with the US. Moreover his 6 Many interview ees and political analysts considered Medina the natural leader to succeed Bosch, as he was the strongest man in the party after Bosch. Medina was one of the early leaders of the PLD but he had a personal history that made his appointment as the successor of Bosch difficult. Medina was a radical leftist in his youth and h e had lived in Cuba being politically active as a member of communist groups. 7 Many interviewees who were party colleagues as well as political analys ts, contend that since then, Medina felt Fernndez owed him a favor for standing on the sidelines and making Fernndez rise within the PLD possible.

PAGE 305

305 instead of the elaboration of a well designed government plan. without directly denouncing 8 Since Balaguer could not run for the 1996 presidential elections, Fernndez said i n an interview that many voters that would have voted for Balaguer switched to Fernndez because of the distance by Balaguer voters without any commitment. Balaguer voters sp ontaneously chose me as I suddenly became the only available candidate that would oppose Pea 9 The closeness to Balaguer and the PRSC elections all parties but the PRSC had a discourse that identified Balaguer as the figure preventing real democratization in the Dominican Republic. Wit h the support of Balaguer for his candidacy, Fernndez stopped his anti Balaguer discourse, which thwarted him from criticizing the PRSC on moral grounds In stead he focused his Pea Gomez. support for Fernndez in rhetoric was supposed to be unconditional. However, when Fernndez was declared the winner of the elections, he knew his power was limited and he approached Balaguer to ask him which secretaries of state and 8 Fernndez represented a new generation of politicians. The vitality of the 42 year old Fernndez astonished an audience accustomed to his pr edecessor, a blind and partly deaf octogenarian. By 1996, Fernndez was already an inveterate internet surfer and he used computer driven presentations to persuade Dominican businessmen as well as urse in 1996 was centered on the modernization of the country; he skillfully articulated a promising look to the future with true liberties and new beginnings without addressing how or which interests were to be touched. 9 Personal interview with President Leonel Fernndez. This statement is consistent with those of other interviewees, as well as with press articles.

PAGE 306

306 government offices Bala guer wanted for his partisans. Surprisingly Balaguer repeated that he did not want any post, and that he was satisfied with stopping Pea Gomez. During both of his administrations Fernndez did not become involve in controversies ; he let others fight the battles. He was not a ubiquitous president, caring instead for his image. His strategy was not to be overexposed or wear out his popularity R ather he spoke at limited times when he felt people should really pay attention. Regular explanations of his gov members. Fernndez said he tried to coach his administrative officials on prudence and timing, because he felt that citizens cared more about their own pocket books than administration policies involving techni calities. Indeed, interviewees that were part of his administrations did not refer or perceive Fernndez as a micromanager, but as a skillful politician who knew how and when to use middlemen, and when to get involved himself. 10 influence In this personality trait, Fernndez ranked higher than in his belief that he could control and influence events. When he first became an active member of the PLD, although Fernndez repeatedly said that he did not have a particular interest in politics, some party colleagues assure d that Fernndez did want to participate actively in politics, and that he had asked the party leadership to be included in the lists for congress on several occasions. 11 Most who know him as a politician agree that Fer nndez would step aside when asked, in order to allow others to become public 10 Interviews with Anonymous DR #2, Anonymous DR #13. 11 Interview with Anonymous DR #2, Anonymous DR #13,and Anonymous DR #1.

PAGE 307

307 party leadership. He remained in his role as party member at the same time that he pursue d careers as a lawyer and a university professor. He impressed Bosch with his press secretary, secretary of foreign affairs and press secretary of the party. 12 In additi on, Fernndez worked as chief editor of the party magazine Politics, Theory and Action (Poltica, Teora y Accin) Similar to Bosch, Fernndez said that he personally wa s always preoccupied with the happenings in the Dominican Republic, but when it came to actively seeking office Fernndez stated: to be presid imply I could not be impassive to inj ustice or to abuse. I wanted to be involved in politics, because I wanted to defend causes that 13 Fernndez was described as an accidental President, as someone who was lucky enough to have things fall in his lap. As stated above, Fernndez was a politician who did not seek power openly or vehemently. Fernndez accepted political one else in his party able 14 He was an intellectual who happened to have the right life story in a moment of time whe n the old leadership needed to be replaced. Fernndez accepted first the vice presidential (1994) and later 12 Without doubt the biggest influence in his life, he contends, was Juan Bosch. Later on, when Bosch became his mentor Fernndez was able to discuss political ideas with him. According to Fernndez in the aforementioned n Dominican thinker that has a finished theory of the Dominican Republic, where he explains wh y we Dominicans are the way we had an exuberant lthough he made mistakes, Dominicans have forgiven him because his merits eclipse the faults he asserted Fernndez. (Personal interview with President Leonel Fernndez) 13 Personal interview with President Leonel Fernndez. 14 Personal interview with President Leonel Fernndez.

PAGE 308

308 the presidential candidacy (1 996), responding to a personal challenge, and at the insistence of the PLD leaders who could not become candidates themselves. He surprised even himself when his style of communication and his ability to empathize, maintain and establish personal relation ships made him likable and approachable to voters. These were the exact traits that party leaders had lacked throughout the that he shared the benefits with his party an d with a reduced group of followers who developed a spirit of camaraderie, loyalty and commitment. Fernndez made people feel that t hey were part of a bigger story, abd he made sure others felt their views were appreciated and considered. He led by mobiliz ing and empowering others. 15 His apparent lack of interest in power made Leonel Fernndez an impervious leader, distant from accusations and resistance that his party colleagues and technocrats confront When corruption scandals arose during his presidenc ies, very few people dared to point the finger directly at him. Fernndez built an image of someone oblivious to power, which protected him from the bad reputation of others in his administration. His collegial decision making style made cabinet members, a s well as other government officials, feel empowered and responsible for their own acts. According to Fernndez, as well as most of those interviewed for this research, an Garca, Fernndez is not a political animal who lives to and for politics. Politics does not 15 nisters to do something he does not call them directly. He personally makes phone calls them and greets them by first name. He then asks the secretaries [or assistants] to tell the minister s that he would like this or that to happen with an established deadline (usually around the corner). When the ministers call back the President to ask for details, he becomes unreachable, leaving the ministers to figure out on their own how to deal with t

PAGE 309

309 seem to come naturally to him. In fact, when asked about his early interests and his coming into politics, he said he did not have a clear view of the role that politics would play in his life until the circumstances presented themselves. He did not grow up with the idea of becoming a politician; he became a politician based on his intellectual curiosity and discipline, aspects that gained him respect and attenti on. Moreover, he publicly said he was not conscious of possessing any special skill for politics. power for the sake for power at least not in his first presidency was the l ost opportunity to change the constitution to run for re election. A phrase that has remained in the public discourse since 1998 and that is commonly used to depict Fernndez as weak and indecisive was coined by PRSC opposition senator Amado Aristy, who in constitutional amendment that would have allowed Fernndez to run for re election in 2000. Indeed, right before the elected congress (1998 2002) assumed office in August 1998, s ome members of the old congress (1994 1998), mainly PRSC and PLD congressmen, sought to move forward a constitutional amendment for re election that would have clearly benefited Fernndez. It was said that the PLD machine offered money in exchange for pass ing the amendment. However, Fernndez refused to pursue the constitutional change; he cited democratic principles, as well as the need to focus on finishing a good administration without the distractions of a presidential campaign. Whether or not those all egations were true at the time, the fact is that even though he could, he did not change the constitution.

PAGE 310

310 Fernndez tried to keep the image of a democrat, but he effectively remained the party boss despite contested primaries. Medina challenged Fernnd 2007, when he pursued the PLD nomination for the presidential elections of 2008, but e that Fernndez did not seek re election during his first presidency because of his fear of Balaguer, but during the second administration when Balaguer was no longer on the political scene Fernndez made explicit his desire to amend the Constitution in order to lift term limits altogether. This was controversial, to say the least, in a country with a history of dictatorship and authoritarianism. 16 Information When it comes to openness to contextual information, Fernndez was the paradigm of an open decis ion maker, who was willing and eager to receive input from others and from the political environment in general. Newness and surprises did not affect him greatly, because his style was to be accepting and he was accustomed to the ups and downs of an enviro nment he knew he could not control and had no wish to control According to Herman, leaders who continuously seek out information from the environment in order to know what to do and how to conform to the current situation do not have a strong sense of who they are. Often, leaders who are low in the self confidence trait try to compensate by being open to contextual information. However, leaders who are open to receive information from the environment without a fixed idea of what to expect are more sensitiv e to the environment and more responsive to the 16 The Dominican Constitution was changed and Fernndez won a third term (2005 2008, but after the constitutional change re election remained possible for a fourth term. Fernndez desisted from running for re election in 2012.

PAGE 311

311 needs and wants of others than their self confident and obstinate counterparts. Fernndez was the type of leader who made others feel that they had his complete attention and that he cared for them, coming ac ross as a person who could empathize with, relate to and reflect the views of those around him. Fernndez was a good decision maker when he was not under pressure. He was studious, thorough and engaged when making policy de cisions. He was independent to the point of being perceived as a loner. More than been described as intelligent, the interviewees referred to Fernndez as disciplined, knowledgeable, well rounded and a voracious reader of Dominican history the classics a nd current worldwide publications. 17 It seemed that he learned about problems from the environment, while at the same time he sought answers in books. Fernndez has been described as someone whose attention and efforts focus on processes and not on outputs. 18 To a certain extent, the idea of being interested in knowledge more than power fits his own assessment of his masterpiece, his foundation. FUNGLODE (Fundacion Global para la Democracia) was a source of generation of knowledge, a think tank, and a library ; I left office the first time. I needed breathing space .M y party was pressuring me to take full control of it, but I did not feel it was right. It was s boss. I am not interested in power ; I am 17 The books and authors that have greatly impacted Fernndez were not necessarily political but he regarded them I MyL ife volume bio graphy of Trotsky : The Prophet Armed (1954), The Prophet Unarmed (1959) and The Prophet Outcast expression and it made a very deep impression on me, also for the political c literary value more than non fictional content. They include; Shakespeare's The Merchant of Venice and Othello; and The 9 3 ; Joseph Fouch and the Beware of Pity of Stefan Sweig, the tales of Personal i nterview with President Leonel Fernndez). 18 Interview with Anonymous DR #2.

PAGE 312

312 interested i n life and society; was not in office, I put a lot of effort in the foundation, and I a lso needed 19 Several sources have confirmed his inclination for learning and knowledge, from an early age to the tim e of the writing of this research. On the one hand, Fernndez had a complex personality that often led him to intellectual isolation. On the other, he received harsh criticism for not reacting against corruption quickly enough because he had turned a blin d eye to his partisan administration, often perceived as corrupt and protected by the president. This led some analysts to question his ethical and moral principles. To some his privacy and isolation were unnerving, while for others it was his sense of pra cticality that was upsetting. habit of studying various alternatives when making decisions: ess it respectfully to make it resonate with people. That is what I do and the reason why I established friendship with diverse political forces; I do not believe anyone possesses the absolute truth, but that what matters are the valuable experiences from the 20 With effort and talent he gained the image of a capable professional and a politician knowledgeable, serene and correct in his manners. On the other hand, he descends into rh etorical abstraction, spends too much time thinking about what he is doing wrong, and comes across as distan t distracted, aloof, and even phony. But 19 Personalo interview with President Leonel Fernndez. 20 04elpepiint_17/Tes

PAGE 313

313 when he acts like a r eal politician. One of his colleagues said that this attitude has been well studied, and is constantly rehearsed. 21 His complexity is also evident when people describe his natural curiosity, his dedication to learn and his ability to move back and forth bet ween two cultures, Dominican and American. Indeed his experience as a S. He admire s the American way of life, the American practical outlook to the world. Fernndez believes that growing up in New York City shaped his thinking and his life because the U.S. became a reference point that allowed Fernndez to compare realities, to come up with proposals and to dream big. confidence and events in the environment. Leaders who are low in self confidence easily change their positions and continual ly seek out information from the environment in order to know what to do and how to conform to the demands of the circumstances in which they find themselves (Hermann 2003:194 195). As explained earlier, the biggest obstacle for Fernndez during his first presidency was the overwhelming power of Joaqun Balaguer approval for governing decisions. To overcome this, Fernndez chose to shy away from domestic politics; he was success ful in leading an active agenda in the foreign policy arena, to the point that his Foreign Relations minister was more a figurehead than a decision maker. foreign policies allowed the Dominican Republic to be part of the international community and made himself an active player in regional affairs. It 21 Interview with Anonymous DR #1

PAGE 314

314 was not only important for the future of the country, but it was also a process that allowed Leonel Fernndez to display his sharp diplomatic skills, congeniality and knowledge. The very clever stra tegy envisioned by Fernndez involve gaining personal recognition and respect at the international level in order to be validated domestically, particularly in a context still dominated by Balaguer. His capacity as mediator was welcomed, particularly in La tin American affairs. For instance, at the XX Rio Group Summit held in Santo Domingo in March 2008 he helped to ease tension between Ecuador, Venezuela and Nicaragua against Colombia, after Colombian military forces shot a Colombian guerrilla leader in Ec uadorian territory. Thanks to his mediation efforts, the Latin American presidents shook hands and moved on. His strategies at the Fernndez conformed within the limited oppor tunities that the political landscape allowed him, and he adapted to it. Fernndez was described as admitting he 22 what others said, making people think he agreed with them, which made him likeable. Fernndez beca me informed, made decisions and evaluated issues by tackling them by sector, via temporary councils or seminars with small groups of people. The groups he organized worked as small cabinets: social cabinet, economic cabinet, public works cabinet, electrici ty cabinet and provincial council. Other sources of information were groups formed by members of civil society. The dynamic in the groups was debate, 22 Interview with Ano nymous DR #2 which was confirmed by Anonymous DR #1.

PAGE 315

315 where he listened, asked questions and used the discussions to make decisions on his own at a later time. In both administrations, there were initiatives to define the endless discussions on what to do were perceived as lack of decisiveness. Some attribute this perception to his c ollegial style of decision making, while others contend that he was passive and slow in making decisions. Although none of the interviewees indicated that Fernndez was low in self esteem, nor that there was any evidence that he lacked self assurance, som e leaders with similar behavioral characteristics similar to those of Fernndez compensate their low self accommodating and to avoid conflict. employed articulate language at all times. Fernndez liked to think that the word that 23 Indeed, a lthough he often came across as modest and unassuming, some people asserted that h would not waste an opportunity to exhibit how knowledgeable he was. Possibly that was his biggest asset, to appear smart and sure about his positions. However in this decision making process he seemed more dubitative. Fer nndez was often perceived as soft due to his style of communication which allow ed more participation and dialogue ; his seminar like method where people discussed points of views and where he mainly listened ; his taking time to make decisions and not ann ouncing his decisions directly. But these characteristics paid off as he garnered support during his first presidency, which ended with favorable high ratings as shown in Figure 6 3. 23 Personal i nterview with President Leonel Fernndez.

PAGE 316

316 When things go wrong in a country, the tendencies in public opinion ar e usually reflected in a drop in the ratings of presidential performance, government performance and personal opinions of the president. An interesting quality of Fernndez as a president was his likeability amongst Dominicans, 24 who held favorable opinion s of Fernndez, while his government w as seen unfavorably as shown in Figure 6 2 and Figure 6 and his ability to remain in high esteem can be understood in terms of his personal characteristics, which made him popular and like able. Indeed, from the beginning of his political career on the national stage he proved to be a good communicator. He came across as capable, and vehement about civic duty and personal correctness As candidate and politician, Fernndez displayed his ex traordinary gifts as a communicator, 25 and his image contrasted strongly with Meja second presidency). While the PRSC and PRD presidents incited strong negative reactions, trans mitting fear, aggressiveness, and toughness Fernndez came across as innocuous, decent, of fine manners, approachable, and respectful of his adversaries and the citizenry. Fernndez used the clientelistic network developed by the PLD as a communication ch annel with the party and society in general. As discussed in chapter 6 the party network informed Fernndez about the needs not only of party colleagues, leadership or sympathizers, but also of society. Citizens in the Dominican Republic tend to establish their economic and social needs. At the political participation level the clientelistic 24 Interview with Anonymous DR #12 and with Anonymous DR #15 25 Interview with Anonymous DR #3, Anonymous DR #6, and Anonymous DR #12.

PAGE 317

317 network also served to extend the party influence in the regions of the country by co opting and supporting local leaders. Furthermore, Fernndez created a very effective information system as part of the presidential office, which provided strategic ana lysis of daily data and world trend s as well as public opinion and focus group research This modern tool was the first unit created in the Dominican Republic during his first administration. During the inter presidency period this information system was moved to his foundation FUNGLODE, and during the second presidency it remained in FUNGL ODE as an entity separate from the party and the administration. According to Fernndez, his presidential needs were so vast that in order to govern, he tried to learn directly as much as he could from society. He said he was always in constant communicat ion with average Dominicans. 26 Moreover, he said he was innately curious and that he tried to become an expert (he said he was passionate) filters to process information. How ever, he tried to obtain his own information when 27 as a presidential resource. Start ing in 1998 the political logic in the Dominican Republic switched from class oriented parties to a logic dominated by the media. Fernndez took advantage of the new means of communication by using the power of the media to magnify his image. Particularly in his second administration, he used the media very efficiently, and there was a permanent campaign to improve his image. He went public in a very interesting manner. He was not the politician of mass rallies; he regularly 26 Personal int erview with President Leonel Fernndez. 27 Personal interview with President Leonel Fernndez

PAGE 318

318 communicated through TV, by only on key decisions. There was also considerable advertisement of public works started and finished during his administrations. Besides his capacity to communicate in a very direct way, his style made people feel the messages were individually crafted. Fern persuasive, often although he was not a populist. Fernndez was very aware of the attempts to manipulate him, and his remedy against manipulation and misinformation was direct knowledge. His way of learni ng y myself 28 Furthermore, in his second presidency he said that despite being in office and being in a position somehow distanced from citizens, he tried to maintain contact with average people: I have not lost touch with the people, I travel to the interior three times a week and I ask for their insights. Dominicans are talkative. During my visits people often leave their names on pieces of paper that they hand to me I use that personal information to call the people (at least several dozens per week) and ask for their situation P eople are often surprised when they learn that it is me, their president who is calling them. I like to keep things personal, I ask abou complaints as much as I can. 29 Motivation As Hermann contends, leaders are motivated by two factors: problems or relationships. The former refers to being moved by a cause or a specific goal, while the second refer s to a desire to be accepted and feel that one is part of a group. 28 Personal interview with President Leonel Fernndez. 29 Personal interview with President Leonel Fernndez.

PAGE 319

319 realm of issues. While it true that Fernndez considers himself a modernizer above all, it arises from his e xperience in New York, which provided him with a transnational vision of the Dominican Republic. With one foot in the Dominican Republic and the other in the U.S., he felt equally comfortable in both countries. 30 He often expressed that he would like to ma modernizing the Dominican Republic was not modernization at the institutional level, nor at the cultural level. Fernndez was concerned about joining Balaguer and Trujillo in t which has more to do with building modern infrastructure as the basis for development. Certainly Fernndez was harshly criticized for seeking to fulfill his own dreams at the expense of solving more pressing needs. Such is the case with the metro he fought for and effectively built in Santo Domingo. When asked what he took pride in achieving as President of the Dominican Republic, Fernndez spoke about the people he met who he called friends, 31 from poor Dominicans in the remote corners of the Hispaniola Island to famous people in the domestic and international realm. Among the latter, he mentioned Dominican baseball players Juan Marichal, and Sammy Sosa, businessm a n Donald Trump, and hotel magnate Boykin Curry media celebrities Charlie Rose and Fareed Zakaria, and other heads of state. Almost in an anthropological way, he referred to his fascination with 30 None of the interviewees was able to provide informat they point out anyone who knew Fernndez during those years. Fernndez has kept his personal life away from the public eye. Most of the information from his early life in this dissertation comes from a n article published in Listin Diario in April 2009 31 Persoanl i nterview with President Leonel Fernndez.

PAGE 320

320 people. However, this fascination is d etached; it has nothing to do with empathy. His chief concern is having a place in history along with the modernizers of the Dominican Republic. If Trujillo had been the moderniz ing dictator and Balaguer the authoritarian modernizer, Fernndez sought to be the modernizer in democratic times. Fernndez pushed for specific projects that he sought to make happen at the expense of economic rationale during his second administration. His projects did not respond to the immediate needs in the Dominican Republic. Instead they focused mainly on infrastructure, a nd his administration embarked o n expensive infrastructure projects, such as the Metro, bypasses, roads and highways. The urgent needs during both his first and second administration were poorly addressed, p articularly when it came to affordable public health care services, social security and improved educational programs. To this type of criticism Fernndez contends: I am aware of the criticisms of the Metro. It was not my narcissistic project. I can see t hat the price of oil will keep going up in coming years, and we need to be prepared for the future and look for alternative sources. This is what my administration is doing; I am not governing for the next elections in the modernization agenda, because the gaps will be even wider if we do not tackle both. 32 His focus was also on relationship, as he was concerned about garnering the support and the approval of the powerful organized interests D uring his first term t his and in the second toward keeping the members of his party and the large clientelistic network he built strong and dependable. 32 Personal interview with President Leo nel Fernndez.

PAGE 321

321 Degree of in group bias Hermann asserts that leaders who have low in group bias also have a low sense of distrust of others and are likely to view politics as opportunities. Hermann contends that these leaders are proactive as opposed to reactive. Moreover, they are focused on taking advantage of opportunities a nd relationships. This seems to be the case of Fernndez, who did not have strong emotional attachment to a specific group, displaying this trait as moderate in his first term and low i f at the personal level Fernndez was a loner, at the political level he displayed an enormous capacity to cooperate with the traditional political class and to be tolerant of excesses, corruption and misbehaviors, particularly by his party colleagues. It is unclear if this tolerance is a political strategy for survival, or if there is a personal need to feel part of something or if he wants to feel he is part of an elite to compensate for his humble origins. His focus on processes and not outcomes, taki ng into consideration stakeholder s and decision makers, made those involved feel empowered, in both his first and second administrations. Fernndez was re elected in 2004, not so much as a recognition of his own qualities, but because his hugely unpopular predecessor and rival, Hiplito Meja had poorly managed the economic and political crisis of 2003. Since Fernndez had presidential experience, the people knew what to expect, and what kind of politician he was. For many Dominicans the presidential image of Fernndez was the reassuring evidence of moderation, discretion and eloquence as compared to Meja whose outbursts, vulgarity and impetuous behavior had lowered the presidential image. Indeed, upon his return, Fernndez prudently managed Dominican pub lic opinion,

PAGE 322

322 something he did easily after his first government and that he accentuated after Meja 33 Fernndez came back to power on a platform of reinstalling economic order. But he was also in charge of a voracious party that wanted to be back in govern ment and to take advantage of power. He knew that he was going to be judged more on his ability to manage the economy than o n his capacity to reform the state and the political institutions. Whatever the goal, he used the same style to seek support and to bring adversaries to his camp. At the start of his second term Fernndez assembled a team that quickly signaled an economic shift and implemented austerity policies. In his cabinet he kept many of the people from his first administration mostly PLD partis argument was that his cabinet worked well the first time governing. 34 However the support he provided to his party colleagues weakened his own public support as corruption scandals came to light, particularly during Meja s administration a nd Fernndez second administration. The biggest disappointment of Fernndez was the lack of a noticeable decrease in corruption compared to his predecessors or between his first and second administrations. Like other politicians, Fernndez did not follow through on his promises to reform the state and to stop corruption. Moreover, he was perceived as a feeble decision maker, a permissive president who pretended not to see corruption. During his first administration he supposedly had an excu se for not prosecuting Balaguer and his officials because he owed Balaguer the support to win the 33 Some analysts contend that the PLD second administration had a pay slip of at least forty journalists and media persons in order to get favorable coverage http://w 34 Personal interview with President Leonel Fernndez.

PAGE 323

323 presidency. 35 But he did not have that excuse the second time around. Some critics say that he was even more permissive in his second administration than in h is first. Corruption scandals plagued both of his administrations, but little was done to actually prosecute and punish the accused. Thus Fernndez became an accomplice to the ethical faults of his political colleagues. During his first presidency many f riends, colleagues and family members were given state position s, thus continuing the nepotism which was a characteristic of all previous administrations. 36 This practice continued during his second presidency. Fernndez contended that in both of his presid encies he tried to promote the isolation of Civil Service from party influences, but that it was virtually impossible because the dominating political culture forced parties to appoint state employees at the expense of meritocracy. Party members in state j obs, he said, are important in order to prevent state workers from leaking information which would weaken the administration in place. Moreover, he asserted that the private sector ha d not developed sufficiently to provide alternative jobs. 37 He admitted th at despite his personal will to change behaviors it was difficult for his party to deny access to state jobs to those party members who had worked on the campaign. He said he could fight his own party and be unrewarded. He also talked about the difficult y of bringing technocrats to key state positions on political merit 35 Fernndez appoin ted Abel Rodriguez del Orbe as A ttorney G eneral in both administrations, and in 1997 he stated, "I am willing to use the discret ionary power that I am entitled by law in order to archive any criminal investigation against Dr. Joaqun Balaguer if I think that a public action can bring any type of political or social problem." RUMBO 163 36 Portuaria Dominicana) and then consul in Panama. His sisters ngela Fernndez and Josefina Fernndez did not hold high ranking positions but managed budgets for charities associated with the state. Other examples include his colleague and law firm partner, Radhams Jimnez Pea, who was Director General of Airports, as well as his former employer and partner Abel Rodriguez Del Orbe who was General Attorney. 37 Personal interview with President Leonel Fernndez.

PAGE 324

324 said. 38 development of private sector and state policies is required in order to professionalize civil service in the Dom inican Republic. I t will take a lot of time and a change of during bot h of his administrations, there was a proliferation of committees of diverse nature which created multiple layers that complicated hierarchies and decision making. Distrust of others e helped him see possibilities for win win agreements, and to build relationships through opportunities instead of threats. However, as President he shared with Balaguer the policy of rejection of the Haitian influence in the country. Because of the histor y of hostilities between the two nations, Dominican politicians have blamed Haitians for the ills of the country, and Fernndez was no exception. With the country being the poorest in the western hemisphere, Haitians look for better opportunities in the Do minican Republic and Haitian immigrants comprise a significant portion of agricultural and cheap labor in the country. During his two administrations Fernndez has considered Haitians a source of distrust for the country, and often times he has employed a n anti Haitian discourse. Hermann argues that leaders high in distrust are constantly vigilant and want to anticipate, as they see the world as a threat P roblems are confronted as a zero sum game. Fernndez said that in his first presidency he was nave and too trustful; his personal challenge as a politician and President was to learn to trust only a handful of people. Fernndez believed that the small battles won on a daily basis contributed to 38 Personal interview with President Leonel Fernndez.

PAGE 325

325 give him a myth like image. He said that people around him did not believe he could not have a small group of advisers; instead I have councils that specialize in different sectors. The presidency is a lonely job. I take the tim e to think and to read, and to figure out how to express my views. I try not to be influenced by everyday burdens. I take time all has he trusted someone enough to ask for personal advice on political matters. When Fernndez asked other s he used them as reference; he was not seeking their advice. 39 Even though this behavior indicates that Fernndez was not overly trustful, it does not imply that he saw threats in people. Fernndez made use of a vast information network and teams. However at the end of the day, it was Fernndez who made decisions alone over the course of events and policies. His positive outlook on problems combined with his power of persuasion allowed Fernndez to pass legislation and to be perceived as a listener instead of as a threat. He said that after dealing with an opposition dominated Congress during his first administration, he felt that ict 40 In fact, at the beginning of both of his mandates, he assumed office with his party PLD in th e minority in both chambers of C ongress as shown in Table 6 3. In his first year in office Fernndez faced close to four hundred strikes, protes ts, and blockades. Despite the res istance in Congress, as well as in the streets he was able to pass important legislation that reformed fiscal accounts and ordered state finances. His 39 One group that he often met during his second presidency, because of the importance of the sector was Temistocles Montas, Hector Valdez Albizu, Daniel Toribio, all secretaries of state in the economic sector during his second administration; two of them are PLD members and the other independent. Another person in this sec tor was 40 Personal interview with President Leonel Fernndez.

PAGE 326

326 consensus seeking managerial style meant inviting people with differen t points of view to the discussion table, to listen to them and entertain different scenarios. His patience was also a weapon to wear out adversaries, as demonstrated when applying and approving a set of policies for fiscal reform advised by the IMF to ope n the Dominican economy and liberalize economic factors. He outwitted opposition Congressm e n by calling for a National Dialogue that lasted several months to establish the Dominican term development strategy. 41 nsensus 42 But it was also a survival mechanism. He called for the national dialog not only because he needed a legitimacy boost, but also to gain time. His administration i nvited all stakeholders and asked for their opinions, an unprecedented action in Dominican history. While stakeholders discussed their views for the Dominican Republic, the administration engaged in seeking more support. In his position as President of the country, Fernndez sought to meet the leaders and representatives of economic and social organizations at the one on f 43 Discus sion This chapter characterized Leonel Fernndez presidential leadership style based on trait analysis. In both terms Fernndez displayed a behavior that made him a respecter of the constraints of his envir onment H e also demonstrated that he was a leader open to receiv ing information from the environment and willing to incorporate that 41 Dore Cabral (1998). 42 Personal interview with President Leonel Fernndez. 43 Personal interview with President Leonel Fern ndez.

PAGE 327

327 information as a key part of his decision making. When it came to motivations lationship rather than problems. Thus collegial (in his first and second presidency) and at times opportunistic (mainly during his second presidency). Fernndez displayed a behavior that was respo nsive to constraints in that he did not challenge the constraints, but respected them. With regards to openness to innovation, he demonstrated a great capacity to tune into the environment, as he welcomed information and adjusted his thinking and behavior to the incoming information. His focus of attention has been on assessing what is possible in the current situation and context and finding the necessary support to govern G iven that he consider ed he wa s concerned in leaving a legacy in infrastructure that was tangible and visible (not institutional). He was sensitive to his constituents and activated the clientelistic network built by the PLD during his tenure. The collegial aspect of Fernndez style of leadership resides in his focus on reconciling differences and building consensus, on gaining personal prestige and status by empowering others and sharing accountability. Table 7 1 presents a I n his first term, Fernndez respected the political constraints set to fit the exist ing clientelistic network that Balaguer developed and fed throughout his tenure. politic those constraints could have been challenged, but his openness to receive the cues of the environment dictated passivity and accommodat ion which in turn he lped to maintain the status quo H is focus

PAGE 328

328 was on reconciling differences and building consensus among his support group not did not lead to democratic enhancement. T he Dominican Republic experienced instead dem ocratic stagnation The fostering/hindrance of slight democratic p rogress did not change amid the timid presidential impulses. Democratic transformation was not substantial in the Dominican Republic. The biggest disappointment of Fernndez was his permiss iveness of corruption. Like other politicians, Fernndez did not follow through on his promises to reform the state and to stop corruption. His collegial and sometimes opportunistic style of leadership provided the necessary flexibility to accommodate dem ands from his political rivals and from his party, and to a was able to forge a political image of a serious politician, who was knowledgeable, calm, and correct in his manners. Wheth er or not these features were all studied, trained and rehearsed as has been claimed, Fernndez came across as an astute politician who learned quickly from Bosch, as well as from Balaguer, the art of politics: how to calculate, predict, and act. Instead o f imposing, his accepting style helped release tensions and allow dialog, which was beneficial to him and to those who sought to maintain the status quo From the perspective of fitting in with the political and secular time and place, both presidencies w ere successful. There was no friction between the political order, the power coalition of interests and his goals and agenda. In fact, Fernndez agenda was of continuation, he was more concerned with staying in power than touching on highly entrenched inte rests. Fernndez did not seek to change the structures of power

PAGE 329

329 altogether; rather, he sought to enhance the political apparatus created by Balaguer. He also relied on his party organization to transform the practice of patrimonialism into clientelism, eff ectively manipulating the distribution of patronage. While clientelism is something that hinders democratic improvement, at least i t was a step ahead of the Balaguer system, because the network expanded. But it did not constitute a democratic advancement. Moreover Fernndez fostered debate among people, but the results were far from satisfactory. With Fernndez, an opportunity opened for people to air their views, but the debate and the ideas did not necessarily become public policies. Like Eisenhower, Fer nndez had what Greenstein (1982) describes as hidden hand leadership, referring to the quiet manner in which he eliminated his rivals and kept a low profile to enforce his executive orders. He obtained results by leading indirectly and by delegating much of the political side of his leadership to cautiously planned officials. During his administrations, freedom of speech was not called into question H owever, his party and the state apparatus were able to co opt journalists and media outlets through patron age. Participation and contestation were expanded, but they remai ned limited. Fernndez could not get rid of the clientelistic practices that his party had maintained as a feature of the political system. The media reproduced and magnified clientelism mak ing people believe that they would benefit from closeness to the leader or his entourage. Moreover, urban clientelism showed a president not Personality is an aspect that tends to be consistent over time (Post, 2003; Greenstein, 1987). However, research on personality suggests that people also use

PAGE 330

330 across a period of time, across topics and audiences (Hermann, 2003). Bet ween his first and second administrations Fernndez showed a distinct shift at the personal level due to the influence of Balaguer. In his first government he was concerned about his capacity to govern, while in the second he was more assured in his style and leadership. faire political style during his second presidency, allow ed maximum freedom to subordinates, as well as letting decisions or events pass him were less the result of his character than of lessons learned from his first p residency. Fernndez benefitted from having an administration that was not confrontational. He lacked strength in Congress, and he made effective use of persuasion and precaution to keep from disturbing the existing political arrangements, becasue challeng ing the status quo could have worked against him. of the main differences between Fernndez and other powerful Dominican politicians is that he did not come across as an auth oritarian president. He used clever and indirect methods to achieve his goals through persuasion, passiveness and patience. Indeed, Fernndez had enormous personal persuasive power, from the time of his first involvement in politics to his administration a s president. He had a capacity to ask for and often obtain what he wanted. It seemed that human level, making himself see m trustworthy and sociable. Those who know Fernndez, often mention his preference for dialog ue in order to address problems. As president he showed a preference for avoiding conflict and promoting debate as a tool to propose long term solutions. On the one hand, this is a

PAGE 331

331 sign of the leadership needed in the twenty first century; on the other it shows a weakness of character. Fernndez understood that some policies needed to move away from Foreign relations during both of inistration. Fernndez launched a foreign policy of openness H e started negotiations for the Free Trade Agreement with Central America, and he became active in international forums and in international organizations.

PAGE 332

332 Table 7 ship styles: s cores on seven traits Characteristic First presidency: Collegial Second presidency: Collegial Challenger/respecter Respecter Respecter Belief can control events Low Low Need for power Moderate Moderate Openness information Open Open Contextual complexity High High Self confidence High High Motivation: Problem/relationship Relationship Relationship Task vs. interpersonal focus Relationship Relationship In group bias Moderate Low Distrust of others Low Low

PAGE 333

333 CHAPTER 8 A TIVE AND ARTICULATIV E PRESIDENCIES the third wave of democratization in 1980. This background is needed to understand the political impact of Alan Garca consecutive presidencies in shaping democratization and driving its transformation. 1 Each of the Peruvian presidencies is characterized in the life cycle of three political orders; oligarchic, popular nationalistic and neoliberal political order disjunctive presidency and second articulative presidency As in chapters 4 and 6 this chapter follows order shattering, order affirming and order creating Table 8 1 summarizes the classification of the presidencies in Peru during the popular nationalistic and the neoliberal orders. It also classifies each of the presidencies in its relation to secular and political time. To provide an account of the two political ord ers that existed in Peru since 1980, it is helpful to understand the oligarchic political order and the origins of the popular nationalistic order, which is the order in place during the first democratic presidency What makes the case of Alan Garca uniq ue, both within the history of Peru, as well as when compared to other presidents with non consecutive presidencies, is authority in only one order. In his first p residency Garca was affiliated with the popular 1 Even though 1980 is broadly considered the year in which the third wave started in Peru, the length of the third wave has been questioned, as many characterize the Fujimori regime a reversal of the trend, making Peru the first case in which a demo cratically elected president openly restricted th e system of checks and balances and severely restricted civil liberties and political rights (Tanaka, 1998; McClintock, 1999; Crabtree, 1999).

PAGE 334

334 nationalist ic order when it was vulnerable. I n his second presidency he was affiliated with the neoliberal order when it was resilient. Oligarchic Political Order From the nineteen century up to the 1960s, power were concentrated in the hands of a few privileged: rural white landowners, whose behavior was characterized by political bossism; commercial and financial elites of the coastal region; and a small group supporte d by foreign capital that exploited raw materials. 2 Control of public resources took place at the local and regional level, while actions at the national level were aligned with the immediate interests of the oligarchy. The presidential strategy consisted in avoiding an upset to the oligarchs and acting in the name of the nation, despite the lack of legitimacy among the majority of the population. The presidential resources were characterized by personal reputation among the oligarchs and the military. Pol itical parties were formed in the offering alternatives. The American Popular Revolutionary Alliance (APRA Alianza Popular Revolucionaria Americana) was the first reformist and mass party and it became a threat to the oligarchy as the party gained many sympathizers. 3 Given its 2 The vast majority of the population, mainly Indian and mestiz os, lived in rural areas and were not considered citizens. The economic and social arenas were also controlled by the oligarchy which had a monopoly on the means of production and commerce T he relation with the rest of the population was of dependence. T his relation of dominance was racist and violated all principles of justice. Illiterates, women and indigenous peoples had no social or political rights. Women did not receive the right to vote until 1955. Scholars specialized in Peru often refer to this k 3 APRA was founded in 1924 by Victor Raul Haya de la Torre. It started as a pan american political organization that postulated anti imperialism, Pan Americ anism, international solidarity and economic nationalism, but not Marxism. Haya de la Torre did not support Russian like socialism, and he also rejected capitalism. It became a party as the Peruvian branch of the APRA in 1930. Haya and other Apristas (refe rring to APRA members and / or sympathizers) did not believe in class parties and claimed that APRA was an all class party. It gradually emerged as nging a new state of affairs in Peru was to fix both the state and the political system to allow greater mass representation,

PAGE 335

335 international postulates of making an indo american sub continental party, it was rejected in the Peruvian constitution of 1933, which explicitly did not recognize international political parties. Its leaders were repressed and sent to exile and for many years they operated underground. The Socialist Party also posed a threat since it called for a socialist revolution 4 A series of conservative military governments allied with the oligarc hy for intermittent short periods of civilian rule, which in turn advocated for moderate reform The common denominator between civilian and military rule was the resistance to political and social incorporation and the inclusion of the majority of the pop ulation. In economic terms, over the years Peru accumulated a significant external debt; its model of development was capitalist based on exports, and this model lasted until 1968. 5 As the population grew, pressed for land reform and migrated to the citie s, the coastal regions of Peru developed and modernized much more than the sierra. Important social changes took place as economic growth and migration allowed the development of a small and professional middle class. The last government before the period Belaunde (1963 1968) with his Popular Action party (AP Accin Popular), 6 which along with APRA led by Haya de la Torre and the Popular Christian Party (PPC Partido while restraining oligarchic privilege, eradicating corruption from public life and establishing a more e fficient bureaucracy to s peed development though an interventionist state (Taylor, 2007). 4 The Socialist Party (PS Partido Socialista) which asserted Marxism was founded in 1928 by Carlos Maritegui. Maritegui contended that democratic and liberal institutions did not exist in Peru due to the ruling of the coastal elite who were in power only for themselves. The writings of Maritegui had considerable influence in Latin America n political thought, as well as in leftist organizations in Peru, including Shining Path and MRTA. Aft er the death of the party leader in 1930, it became the Communist Party of Peru, and throughout the rest of the twentieth century the party suffered from numerous divisions. 5 In 1931 Peru lost its access to U.S. capital markets due to its inability to p ay its debt. 6 In 1956 APRA, but its appeal was greater with the middle class, salaried professionals and non labor workers. For most of its history, the par ty depended on the figure of its founder Fernando Belaunde (president in 1963 1968 and 1980 1985). Previous to the return to civilian rule, the AP pressured the most for free and fair elections. Moreover, it is the only party in Peru that produced three pr esidents.

PAGE 336

336 Popular Cristiano), 7 received mainly the support of the middle class, urban population and voters in the coastal regions. 8 The Belaunde government sought to carry out a reformist leadership project of nationalization and democratization. Initially this hile debilitating support for Haya de la Torre with APRA, the main contender. However, in the end it did not carry out major reforms I t tried modest agrarian reform and focused on colonization and infrastructure projects. As peasant discontent grew and e xports were affected negatively by the end of the world recession when war battered countries started producing domestically, support for the Belaunde administration eroded. 9 Moreover, his market orientation of the economy was seen by many as a way to favo ring foreign capital interests above those of the population. This structural account of the oligarchic order could not be complete without including an agency approach that explains the behavior of political actors who contributed to the poor performance of the Belaunde presidency. An important set of to the Belaunde government. In 1956 Haya de la Torre, in alliance with conservative groups supported an oligarchic gover status. In the process, APRA lost the support of many nationalist and reformist 7 In 1956, Hector Cornejo Chavez founded the Christian Democrat Party (PDC Partido Demcrata Cristiano). The PPC, a dissident faction of the PDC was founded by Luis Bedoya Reyes in 1966. He was also a founder of the PDC, but separated from it a support of Cornejo for the military government. The PPC remained as an important political force in Peruvian politics despite its unimpressive support in the vote share. Am ong it s members were experienced politicians such as Congressmen and mayors, and it managed to make meaningful alliances at important times. In 1978, thanks to its alliance with APRA, the PPC played an important role in writing the constitution of 1979 and sharing leadership in PPC remained an ally of APRA, forming a majority in Congress and becoming an important opposition. 8 At this time the S ocialist Party and other Marxist parties did not play a major role. 9 In 1965 the Movement of the Revolutionary Left (MIR Movimiento de Izquierda Revolucionaria), a guerrilla movement was formed.

PAGE 337

337 10 Haya de la Torre won the 1 962 elections by 1 % over Belaunde. However Haya de la Torre was not able to assume office, because the military intervened, only to call for elections a year later. In the 1963 elections, the alliance AP and PRD with Belaunde as presidential candidate defeated APRA. The APRA leader strengthened its all iance with more conservative groups in a 11 The APRA of no confidence to several ministers, and c ut funds to important projects. With an undermined and weak administration, the Belaunde administration was interrupted by a Popular Nationalistic Political Order Compared to previous Peruvian presidents Velasc o (1968 1975) was an effective political leader. He gave an enormous, unprecedented boost to the radical politics of reconstructive, because he broke with the politics of the past, di sengaging the state the liberal export model of development. His populist aut horitarian military government provided a new power structure to Peru at the political, economic and social levels: an authoritarian power, state led economy and corporatist social organization. 12 His 10 Over the years, APRA created a culture characterized by a cult to its leader Haya de la Torre and by the suffering of apristas during the years of persecution. This culture included the cultivation of a pervasive opposition mentality (Graham, 1990). 11 Together APRA and Odriist National Union (UNO Unin Nacional Odriista), the political front of former president Manuel Odria, became the first majority in Congress. 12 The combination of an authoritarian rule, personalistic style

PAGE 338

338 administration implemented policies that were significan tly redistributionist and mobilizing. The popular nationalistic vision for the country was to promote rapid economic development led by the state to end Peru's dependence on the industrial ca pitalist powers. It also aimed to build a strong nation state in which social justice was achieved and those excluded in the previous political order become feel part of the country (Malloy, 1974:60). The presidential strategy consisted in appealing for political support directly to the people at large and becoming the steward of national policymaking. The presidential resources were characterized by personal leadership backed by the political assistance. The Velasco administration wa s revolutionary in its tactics as it effectively implemented many of the ideas that AP and APRA had on their reformist agendas: agrarian reform, regulation of foreign capital, nationalization, promotion and protection of industrial development, import sub stitution, and state controlled commerce, all achieved via a significant expansion of the state. His government was corporatist, as it created an organization, the National System of Social Mobilization (SINAMOS Sistema Nacional de Movilizacin Social) to maintain order and regulate group relations and rally support for its reforms. The reforms sought to produce economic growth, redistribute resources, and relieve enormous and historical social and economic problems. But the delivery was not through an exp ansion of political rights, but only through improvement in social and economic rights, was the main authoritarian

PAGE 339

339 of the administration were persecuted during the Velasco government. There was censoring in broadcast and print news media, and although at the time no party was illegal, the institutional spaces were closed and the official discourse was anti party (Tuesta, 1995). The greatest contribution of Velasco to Peruvian society was the end of servitude, the recognition of the Peruvian identity as opposed to a class identity, and the possibility to be oneself (Cotler, 1978; McClintock, 1989; Stokes, 1995; Tuesta, 1995; loped a relation between state and society that was authoritarian in nature, in a patrimonialist fashion with corporatist features of interest representation (Klaren,1993). While the control of political power was in the hands of the military, the overall support rested not in the force threat but in the masses. However, with a state ill prepared to deal with its huge new tasks, natural catastrophes, an oil embargo and increasing foreign debt new problems rapidly developed. By 1970, Velasco was accused of bringing economic collapse in the face of rising inflation and diminishing growth. Velasco became seriously ill in 1973, and with his health deteriorating he went into voluntary seclusion and stopped governing. 13 Convalescent and away from Lima, in 1975 he was ousted by his Prime Minister, Francisco Morales Bermdez At that time, the rivalries within the military bureau had deviated the state apparatus attention from public policy. The Bermudez administration could not reverse the negative economic trend I t focused on trying to control inflation and implement austerity programs. Despite the economic problems, the popular nationalistic order 13 His right leg was amputated in March 1973 due to gangrene derived from an abdominal aortic aneurysm.

PAGE 340

340 presidencies, thos e of Franc isco Morales Bermdez Fernando Belaunde and Alan Garca, were part of this political order. Over time, the social actors Velasco empowered found their own voice and started a set of wide scale popular protests. Added to this was the increasing wearing dow n of the military government (Tuesta,1995). Since 1977, the Morales Bermdez government pursued a controlled exit from power, and the military designed a strategy (Plan de Transferencia a la Civilidad) to transfer political power to civilians. 14 The milita ry considered APRA as not only the only party able to manage unions and the Marxist left as well as the le ast extreme of the political options. 15 I n 1978 elections were called for a Constituent Assembly, of which Haya de la Torre became the president. 16 W hile there was participation from the right with PPC, Belaunde with the AP decided not to participate in the elections, arguing that the conditions necessary for an independent and sovereign Assembly were lacking due to the influence of the military. The f ollowing year national elections were held. The Fernando Belaunde P reemptive Presidency (1980 1985) The general elections of 1980 inaugurated the third wave of democracy in Peru. 17 In fifty years, from 1930 to 1980, the country experienced only seventeen years of interrupted rule of elected governments with thirty three years of dictatorships and s eventeen years since the last elections A system of political parties from all 14 For an extensive account of the transition see Cotler (1986) and Dietz (1986). 15 Although APRA had a history of reactionary alliance s, betrayals, and political deals with the military and civilians, the military put its trust in APRA as a lack of another choice. APRA was to manage the transition from authoritarian rule, although APRA lost the monopoly of the social movement organized b y the left. Both the Catholic Church and the U.S. under President Jimmy Carter played a role in promoting the transition. 16 At the age of 83, terminal ill, Haya de la Torre became the most voted member of the Assembly. He was able to sign the new Constitut ion and died in 1979. 17 The elections were considered free and fair; these were also the first elections in which all Peruvians of appropriate voting age were able to participate.

PAGE 341

341 inclinations of the political spectrum emerged, consisting mainly in three block s. 18 On the left there was the United Left (IU Izquierda Unida); in the center left was the APRA, and on the right there were the PPC and AP. The political system in this new atmosphere interacted actively with civil society, which was represented by busine ss interests, workers and new social movements. The transition to democracy also coincided with the inauguration of violent antigovernment actions by Shining Path. 19 On e more time, Belaunde returned to power after winning the elections with 45 % of t he vote, while APRA received 27 % of the national vote with Armando Villanueva as its presidential candidate as shown in Table 8 2. The results were surprising, since AP did not participate in the 1978 elections, but the results showed that the AP h ad since grown in political strength, particularly because Belaunde appeared as the catalyst of a deeply rooted anti military sentiment (McClintock, 1983; 1989; Cotler, 1986; Tuesta, 1995). ign for the presidency was centered in his charisma and in ambitious promises for employment and liberty. Two aspects that worked against APRA in the elections was its closeness to the military junta, and the death of Haya de la Torre with no clear success or. The new administration enjoyed legitimacy but a pile of problems demanded urgent attention. Belaunde inherited a country that was quite different from the one he 18 The three blocks had roots in important traditions of political and intel lectual ideologies and tendencies dating back to the 1920's. 19 At first Shining Path was thought to be a radical wing of the Communist Party of Peru, but later it was considered a guerrilla movement that seriously contested and challenged the very existen ce, nature and legitimacy of the Peruvian state. Its ideology was of Maoist tendency. H owever it was more than a doctrine ; the group assassinated local authorities to the extent that police action was surpassed. Years later the state labeled it as a terror ist organization It developed its organization and support in the Ayacucho region of Peru for over eight years before it began its violent operations in 1980. I t started with violent isolated actions in Ayacucho but soon the extent was such that police act ion was surpassed. In 1982, Belaunde ordered military intervention in the region, only to be extended to other regions as time went on In mid August 1984 signs of massacres were found (fifty bodies were found near Huanta, Ayacucho). The government attrib uted the massacre to Shining Path, although reports on missing people from Ayacucho pointed to government troops. In 1985 violent actions started in the main cities of Peru.

PAGE 342

342 governed in his first administration: an enormous and inefficient state apparatus, a huge external debt, the immediate problem of rising inflation which in turn deteriorated living standards. 20 In terms of powerful groups and main stakeholders, the elite he once new was debilitated and the expansion of political rights effectively incorporated hopeful and active masses. 21 would plant the seeds for democracy and to accomplish the unfinished development agenda from his first term. For this reason, his presidency was preemptive ; he op posed the basic premises of the popular nationalistic order and th e established arrangements, at a time when political order was still resilient. His plan to go back to his old politics, with the same political attachments and political ways debilitated t he existing order at into a descent. The order shattering impulse in Belaunde was perceived as soon as Belaunde assumed office. For example newspapers were returned to their owners, effectively restoring freedom of speech and the press. E xcitement about the new political atmosphere was so great that only four months after the new administration assumed office, also swept the municipal elections. The A while elections remained weak, United Left (IU Izquierda Unida) became the second political force, winning important mayoral elections in the south of Peru. 22 20 Stokes (1995) contends that even though the economic prospects were doomed, the Peruvian state was not in financial trouble T he military regime left a positive current account balance and more than $US 1 billion in foreign reserves. 21 308 strikes were registered involving 192, 654 workers and 2,970,682 man hours lost (Desco, 1980:12) 22

PAGE 343

343 As in his first administration, Belaunde attempted to reform and liberalize the economy, and his order affirming and order creating impulses become more clear when more conservative, his authority and policies can hardly be considered as a neoliberal revolution (Stokes, 1995). He surrounded himself with advisers and technocrats with experience in international financial organizations. They were ready to install a liberal economic program t 1993). These decision makers were affiliated with conservative interests of the once powerful oligarchs and the coastal white elite particularly with liberal economy policies. Belaunde made efforts to attract foreign investment, promote mining and oil exports, infrastructure, instead of alleviating poverty via food subsidies initiated by Velasco. Belaunde economy afloat and to continue a development model based on an isolated export sector. S governm ent, and the two parties formed a majority in Congress with a strong opposition for the Belaunde administration as shown in Table 8 3. Despite good intentions, the accumulated economic problems, natural catastrophes and adverse international environment took their toll in public support for the administration. 23 By 1983, th e surmounting problems included an increase in 23 In 1983 a particularly severe El Nio phenomenon disrupted fisheries and agriculture triggering an economic crisis which originated in accumulated debt and was exacerbated by plunging commodity prices in the international market. The Belaunde administr ation refused to meet the terms of the back in IMFs programs but it did not follow through. Trade credits w ere cut and banks withheld disbursements. Peru could not pay its debts starting in March of 1983, and did not pay loan interests starting in July of 1984. Belaunde

PAGE 344

344 violence with growing leftist terrorism, 24 a wave of human rights violations, increased narcotics trafficking and new fears of military int ervention. 25 Moreover, in the months 26 The second municipal elections of November 1983 served as an assessment o unable to solve s I n the nationwide municipal vote AP candidates were rejected and received only 18 % of the vote as shown in Table 8 4. In general, voters supported leftist parties, which made significant gains. The municipal elections also signaled a revival of APRA, which won the municipalities of the main cities, becoming the single most important political force 27 Alan Garca appeared for the first time as a real leadership alternative in the political spectrum. 28 29 the newly elected mayor of Lima, the clear leader of the once dispersed Peruvian left. 30 maintained investment in electrification and housing projects and assigned one third of the budget to the armed forces, approving the purchase of Mirage fighter airplanes from France. 24 A year later in 1984 the Tpac Amaru Revolutionary Movement (MRTA Movimiento Revolucionario Tupac Amaru) started its violent actions in the northeastern region of Peru. Like the Shining Path it assassinated local authorities, but it also engaged in kidnapping of entrepreneurs and politicians in exchange for large amounts of money and was closely related to drug trafficking. 25 t star ted in Ayacucho spread to other regions, sporadically reaching Lima and other larger cities. Violence was attributed not only to Shining Path, but since 1984 also to Tupac Amaru Revolutionary Movement (MRTA Movimiento Revolucionario Tupac Amaru), as well a s the counterrevolutionary fight. The Truth and Reconciliation Commission (CRV) 2003 Report calculated that between 1980 and 2000 there were 69,280 deaths; two thirds were caused by Shining Path and the rest by state and paramilitary agents. 26 litical language, the President of the Council of Ministers, who has the role of the American Premier) make s the title holder the second mos t powerful official after the President (See El Poder en el Peru, results 1980 2011) 27 The turnout was 64 percent, despite terrorist attempts to frighten the public with bombings in the days just before the vote AP, the party in government won 35 of 159 municipalities A winning 78. While in 1980 the IU and APRA had garnered 46 percent of the national municipal vote, in 1983 they garnered 62 percent (ONPE: Electoral results various years). 28 Starting in 1983, Alan unevenly remained the most powerful politician (See El Poder en el Peru, results 1981 2011). Garca, who was 1985), em to 1985 Garca traveled throughout Peru building the party and recruiting members. His efforts were fruitful as the

PAGE 345

345 Fernando Belaunde was a preemptive president; he was independent fro m the opposition as well as from the establishment. While he had freedom of independence from the established commitments of the still resilient popular nationalistic order, his repudiative authority was manifestly limited by the political, institutional a nd ideological supports that the establishment maintained. Moreover, as the first president of the new democracy, the stakes were extremely high for him T here were many hopes in democracy at all levels. With a glooming economic environment, exemplified b y the negative GDP growth rates, as shown in Table 8 5 t he economic situation, which was pretty much out of his voiced open d iscontent and high expectations, and a newly for med and active political party system, his leadership could not channel the democratic burst and overcome an adverse economic scenario. Furthermore, the d ebt crisis all over Latin America, global demonstration effects, and increasing levels of social mobili zation tested the ability of centers and changes in the economic structure placed severe loads on the political national results of the 1983 municipal elections were favorable to APRA. In his public interventions he was able to present an intelligent, articulative and a revolutionary message wrapped in sparkling rhetoric that promised a social revolution. His social rain party activists had a flavor of hopefulness and redemption for the long waited APRA participation in government. Although young and an a mateur in Congress, Garca was also confident. He became nationally known after an intervention in September 16 of 1982, when Prime Minister Ulloa was impeached and questioned. Garca put the over powerful an d intimidating Ulloa on the spot T he media responded to this act and elevated the young leader to a position equal to the second most powerful man in the governme nt. 29 He engaged the Catholic Church, major industries, foreign aid, and banks to donate and organize the distribution of the milk in 8000 committees throughout the poor neighborhoods of Lima. 30 For an account of the ee Rubio ( 1982).

PAGE 346

346 system. 31 Belaunde assumed the priorities already establishe d by previous governments and tried unsuccessfully to carry out his own leadership project. His but Belaunde failed to build new personal bases of support outside the r egular alliances with the military and the masses. At the end of his government (1980 1985) Peruvians had ambivalent feelings toward Belaunde. He was seen as ineffective and indecisive, and yet he was respected as a symbol of morality and decency. 32 The Al an Garca Disjuctive Presidency (1985 1990) This section describes the general characteristics of the first Alan G arca administration in order disj unctive presidency. If at first it seemed that he order affirmed the popular nationalistic order started by Velasco Alvarado by providing a renewed strength to a sta te led model of development, at the same time he order shattered policies. In the second part of his administration, Garca contributed only to accelerate the nadir of the order, not because he no longer believed he could influence politics, but because of it. His attempt to control banking and finances in 1987 in order to strengthen his economic model of development soon became an improvisation of policies that actually contradicted the very meaning of his order creating efforts. For instance, when Garca started his presidency wever, good politics drives political calculus above the rationality of sound economic policies. At the social level 31 By 1985 less th Investment and Population found in the annex. 32 See APOYO (April 1985)

PAGE 347

347 Garca started his government with unbeatable popularity and legitimacy, but his politics and the failure of his policies played a major role in the demise of the order. More importantly his discourse and oratory contributed to the escalation of aspirations that were not matched with results, eventually leading to a decline in expectations with the sharp economic downturn. The enormous gap between aspirations and expectations is what politically made his administration a failure. In the 1985 elections there was a sense of hopelessness, compounded by the politic al experimentation of four years with democracy preceded by twelve years of military rule. Given the poor performance of the Belaunde administration, Peruvians had high expectations for change. Early in the race and throughout the election campaign, Garca became the favorite among nine candidates. The other two main contenders Izquierda Unida) who led a leftist coalition that lacked coherence and called for the installation of socialism in Peru, 33 and Javier Alva Orlandini of the salient rightist party, AP. 34 In his intensive and extended campaign, Garca traveled throughout Peru leading massive rallies and meeting with special interest groups 35 His disc were the general themes of integration of the indigenous, agricultural development, and decentralization (Dietz, 1986). The campaign focused on providing hope and relied on 33 nd not the coast al white elite. He was popular and percieved as a person who could ignite enthusiasm among the poor and the non politicized population. 34 Alva had an image of a party professional who cared more for partisan activities than reaching out. 35 ess he presented his government strategy to tackle the difficult economic situation called CONAPLAN. Even though some of the APRA interviewees participated in the formulation of the plan and asserted that there had been a plan since 1983, the official plan was only made public in 1985. The plan itself was known by a reduced number of APRA leaders (See Lopez, 1989). See also Diehl, Jackson. "Pragmatic Leader Emerging in Peru." Wash ington Post Dec 31 1984, A8.

PAGE 348

348 Gar project. As seen in Table 8 6, election results signaled a strong sense of belief in the political system With 91 % of registered voters effectively vot ing the 1 985 presidential elections resulted in the highest turnout in the period of study. The election results shown in Table 8 2 signal the strength of the political forces O n one hand there was a turn to the left as APRA and IU garnered 78 % of the vot e but on the other, badly weakened moderate and conservative forces that had dominated Peru for decades, which together received 19 % It also signaled a strong mandate for Garca, who doubled the votes of his closest rival, garnering 53 % of Barrantes received 25 % of the vote and % of the total votes. 36 As per the 1979 constitution there was supposed to be a run off in April since Garca did not get 50 % plus one vote. 37 However, Barrantes conceded making the run off unnecessary. 38 The coalition of interests that supported Garca in power was not highly organized. To a large extent, the voters Garca claimed to represent were those who once applauded Vel Garca supporters also included businessmen who contributed to his campaign and those disenchanted with the first democratic experiment. 39 He received support from the poor urban and rural population, from those who did not have mu ch to lose, as well as from businesses and those who 36 After the elections the AP engaged in restructuring but was never again able to remain as an important contender, as later municipal elections confirmed. 37 A 1985 electoral law was passed interpreting that valid votes incl uded the null and blank votes T herefore APRA was obliged to go to a run off despite winning more than fifty percent of the vote in the first round. 38 During the elections there were countless terrorist attacks. Before the scheduled run off vote and after an attempt to assassinate the National Elections Board president, Barrantes withdrew from the race 39 Reyna (2000) contends that powerful businessmen like Dionisio Romero contributed to the campaign and became close to Garca. However Reyna points out th at they also contributed to other candidates as businessmen tend to distribute risk.

PAGE 349

349 chose to put their faith in an inexperienced politician, whose nationalistic democratic and popular vision was preferred to the more radical option that Barrantes personified. Burguess and Levistky (200 3) argue that economic and electoral environment shape the incentives for party leaders to undertake adaptive strategies, whereas party strategies. Garca had no incent ive to change toward the right or a market oriented strategy because IU was still strong when Garca competed I n 1983 the IU candidate Alfonso Barrantes defeated APRA in the Lima mayoral election. This defeat caused APRA to maintain its leftist tenden cy since it needed to compete for the popular sector vote. Moreover, by 1985 there was no successful market oriented strategy that could serve as referent in the region. When Garca assumed office the situation was delicate, but it was not critical Garc a faced a moderate crisis inherited from an orthodox administration. A t the social level there were massive protests 40 and rising violence; 41 at the economic level there were reduced international r eserves and inflation eating away Peruvian s s hr inking the living standards. Moreover, the country was about to become ineligible for international credit, as it was unable to pay its debt. However, po litically the new administration was in a better position. As shown in Table 8 3, APRA was able to control both legislative chambers with 32 of 60 senate seats and 60 of 107 house seats, 40 Social turmoil due to the deteriorating living conditions was such that during the week prior to the inauguration over, four hundred thousand state employees went on str ike. 41 From 1981 to 1985, seventy states of emergency were declared, fi r st by the police and since 1982 by the military. Rumors about suppression of liberties and military intervention increased, given the existing declared by the Arme d Forces in six departments due to terrorist violence ( See "La subversion se extiende como una mancha de aceite. Alto mando militar declara para EFE". La Republica June 18 1985, 2)

PAGE 350

350 providing an opportunity to govern without major opposition. Moreover, Garca had the opportunity to o rder create ; he was given a mandate to control political definitions. To order create Garca needed to first order shatter some of the existing arrangements. He gained international attention when he unilaterally decided to stop as he assumed office H e also rescinded the operating contracts of three foreign oil companies. At the time, his actions were considered heroic by other highly indebted countries and a blunt defiance to industrialized countries and the international finan cial system. This made Peru a leader to the non aligned countries and a pariah to the financial markets. 42 order shattering impulses as well as his order affirming Garca was able to c urb the military. 43 One of the most delicate issues that Garca confronted was his relationship with the military and the police. While the Belaunde government almost invariably yielded to military requests, Garca did not (McClintock, 1989). From the begin ning of his mandate, he systematically sought to reduce the power of the military and the police. T he most dramatic demonstration was the case of the Mirage jets of 1985. 44 He 42 In order to address the pressing issue of the international debt, partic ularly with the U S Specifically, he announced that the Peruvian government would pay only the equivalent of 10 percent of its exports towards his international debt, and would refuse to negotiate its economic policies with the IMF. One of the most important oil companies, Belco, left the country and the government seized its assets and passed unattractive foreign investment legislation. A year later Garca rescinded all contracts with foreign oil companies ( El Peruano, Normas Legale s August 1985 July 1986). 43 in Peru was the military, above the Presidency and the rest of the executive. From 1985 to 1990 the military took a back seat and in its place the Presidency and the Executive became more powerful. The Catholic Church also increased its power, along with the Legislative and Judicial Branches of the government. (El Poder en el Peru results 1980 2006) 44 Not only did he red uce the budget, particularly in 1986, but he also reduced acquisitions of military guns. Garca partially stopped an overpriced acquisition of Mirage planes by the Belaunde administration. During the nd police officers were retired. ( "Cesan a 37 Generales De La Gc Y De La Policia De Investigaciones." La Republica August 20 1985, 2 3; El Peruano September 1985 May 1986).

PAGE 351

351 budget an d replaced the existing War, Navy and Air Force ministries by creating the Ministry of Defense in 1987. 45 At the domestic level, he also caused a shock when he implemented his working activities for two days while the new officers managed to freeze all banking accounts in foreign currency. 46 The plan also included reducing the size of government by firing of h rank ing government salaries. order creating impulse led him to implement a heterodox economic experiment in which the government stimulated the demand and controlled prices. It also increased salaries for state workers (i.e. teachers, blue col lar workers of state corporations and social expenditures, at first the experiment produced dynamism in the economy, achieving impressive growth as shown in Table 8 5, with 12.10 GDP growth in 1986. The government was assigned the delicate task of distrib ut ing and allocat ing resources to the poor masses, even if it meant affecting the interests of the middle class and the economic elite, including foreign capital. In this sense he displayed his order affirming impulse. 47 Instead of creating a corporatist s making style involved the participation of his party as a vehicle to rally his own personal leadership. As explained in the next chapter, Garca made sure that all important (and 45 There were rumors of after ministry. See "Noches (Y Dias) De Ronda." Caretas 948 March 30 1987. 46 This policy affected mostly the middle class which depended on their savings for future consumption. On the other hand, it made national and foreign investors wary of the administratio n. 47 (1982)

PAGE 352

352 often times less important) decisi ons would involve his personal involvement. The cabinets and top leadership positions of the administration that accompanied Garca rather than on their professional experienc e. Indeed most of his cabinet members had never held important public offices. 48 awaited gain of power was 61 years in the making, during which many generations of APRA members stri ved for the power to put their ideas into action. As a result, the executive was under overwhelming pressure for government jobs, from high ranking officials to less important and even unnecessary public positions. Garca promised he would put into practic and liberty that Haya de la Torre had drafted 49 Meaning that Peru would break free terms. As explained earlier, Velasco implemented ma ny of the vindications that APRA had historically supported. As the APRA principles involved redistributive plans, when the party was in control it sought to continue the work of the popular nationalistic government. Indeed, in the following months Garca did what he said he would. Not only did he act assuming the role of a decisive president, but he also assumed an i deologue posture controlled by the state apparatus through policies. The positive results of his order affirming economic experiment lasted for more than a year, but the experiment was unsustainable, because economic agents did not 48 During his firs t administration 33 out of 55 ministers were APRA members. In his first cabinet thirteen out of eighteen ministers were APRA members The other five ministers were: an ally from the Christian Democracy, the foreign relations minister who was a career dip lomat and the three defense ministers who were members of the military. A table with all cabinet positions and members can be found in the appendix 49 Speech Transcript El Peruano July 29 1985. P. 2

PAGE 353

353 behave the way the Garca administration predicted. In order to oblige economic agents to inv est in Peru in 1987 the administration sought to nationalize the banking industry. His affiliation was not so much to a coalition of interests, but rather it was to the popular nationalistic ideology. When he launched a frontal assault on the mainstays of economy to nationalize banks in 1987, he did not try to shake a strong pillar of his own support. His obstinacy in seeing his state led development model succeed overshadowed the reality that his model was unsustainable given the lack of coherence and the breeding distrust of economic agents. The faulted economic policies of Garca produced the opposite effect of what they were intended to achieve (e.g. unintended reduction of private investment ) Most importantly, the decision to nationalize the rumors provoked strong economic and political uncertainty. During the last three years of his administration, the economy entered into recession with an average of 9.30 % GDP growth and an average of 3 82 % in inflation growth as s hown in Table 8 5. If the political right had been weak since Garca assumed the presidency, from 1987 on it rallied and organized behind the world famous Peruvian writer Mario Vargas Llosa. 50 A personal rivalry started in 1 987, and Vargas Llosa's opposition was decisive in stopping political right reorganized and became a strong opposition to the administration for the rest of his ter m. 50 1993) after he publicly opposed bank nationalization. His personal fame as a writer launched his becoming the spokesperson of the opposition when he wrote an influential editorial in a conserv ative newspaper s (See Vargas Llosa, Mario. "Hacia El Peru Totalitario." El Comercio August 2 1987.) Vargas nationalization as a way of curb ing economic and politic al freedom. He received enormous support from the powerful national business co mmunity and the political right. N ewspapers and other media outlets were highly indebted, and therefore governmental control over the banks meant control of the freedom of the p ress.

PAGE 354

354 argo oth tested the resolve of their nations in standing be hind their leaders. In the case of Garca it backfired completely as the nation turned against him when the political right organized and regained strength. In the case of Jefferson, his vision allowed the United States to emerge as an important world pla yer independent of England (Skowronek, 1993). The approval ratings in Figure 8 1 and 8 administration. In the first phase the approval ratings were above the disapproval ratings, when the order shattering and order affirming impulses of his presidency were more evident. As shown in Figure 8 1 Garca as President maintained continuous approval ratings until October of 1987, and even some approval ratings until January of 1988. The data for the overall Peruvian gover nment shown in Figure 8 2 indicate that the government started to receive disapproval ratings as early as March 1987. As we saw in other chapters, personal approval ratings of other presidents tend to be higher approval ratings. This effect is telling of the C itizens attribute successes and failures more to persons than they do to the workings of governments or administrations. While many scholars on Peru have noted that negative economic indicators raised red flags on the direction of the country as early as 1986, Peruvian public opinion of Garca himself gave him room to maneuver until the end of 1987.

PAGE 355

355 Figure 8 2 also shows the impact on public opinion of the rumors and then the his decision to back off from nationalization once he faced a strong opposition. Both rumors and his decision reversed public opinion, tuning it ag ainst him for the rest of his administration. In Figures 8 1 and 8 2 the second phase of the Garca Presidency is marked by disapproval ratings being higher than approval ratings. ch to terrorism, one of the most pressing and dramatic issues suffered by Peru. Like ulted from the beginning. T errorism was conceived as a response to the poor social and economic conditions of the population i n the rural areas, particularly in the Andean south. The order shattering impulse was the importance of the Ministry of Agriculture and by passing laws that provided credit to peasants. The order creating impulse was exemplified by a series of policies toward establishing a direct relationship between his administration and peasant organization with the Rimanakuy meetings, the relaunching of Agrarian Bank, and the dec entralization attempt being the most salient. 51 The order affirming impulse led to the implementation of an anti insurrection strategy that called for the respect of human rights and social development in the most violent areas. However as the economy beca me unmanageable and terrorists increased attacks in the cities, the government deviated its attention from rural areas and even paralyzed the process of 51 Rimanakuy meetings were encounters between Garca, his cabinet and peasant communities in rural areas. The administration became aware of demands and the Rimanakuy meeting served for the development of decentralization policies (Reyna, 2000).

PAGE 356

356 decentralization (Schmidt, 1989). It was only toward the end of his administration that a specialized c ounterterrorism unit was created. 52 The first Garca presidency was disjunctive As explained in Chapter 2, with an existing authority structure while being embedde d to a vulnerable political order. Indeed Garca was an affiliated leader in a vulnerable political order T authority and structure were set up during the military regimes and the political order bega Garca exercised h is first presidency unaffiliated with the structure of authority that Belaunde had left. However, because of links to the coalition of interests that had once supported Velasco, Garca was able to gain support temporarily. When Garca assumed the presidenc y in 1985, the political order at first sight did not seem vulnerable. However not only were the Morales Bermdez and Belaunde presidencies calling into question the w ay the state related to society. Garca tried to resurrect the the guiding ideas did not suit reality and the conditions for its implementation had changed dramatica lly. If at the beginning of his mandate, Garca possessed the ability to be heard, after 1987 he struggled to keep his leadership project, and with the rise of the political right a new project was envisioned. 52 In March 1990 a special intelligence group (GEIN Grupo especial de Inteligencia), was created as part of a police Agency against Terrorism (DIRCOTE Direccin contra el terrorismo). Its task was to focus on intelligence operations that sought to capture the m ain leaders. In June 1 st 1990 GEIN found a house in Lima where Shining which according to many led to his final capture and therefore to the to the defeat of Shining Path (Personal interview with Anonymous PER#2).

PAGE 357

357 by V elasco, no longer held much hope for effectively addressing the most pressing questions of his day. The end of the 1980s signaled the demise of an era throughout the world. 53 Disappointment associated with state intervention was exacerbated with the new bal ance of forces that the municipal elections of 1989 revealed and that the presidential election of 1990 confirmed. Table 8 4 shows the growing importance of independent candidates and platforms during those years 54 s contradictions were more clearly manifested in his economic policies H e ordered his economic team to launch more orthodox policies in order to control inflation but disregarding its effects in the population. The magnitude of the economic disaster was s o great that all the social conquests, such as higher salaries, enhanced working rights, and even low guaranteed prices of basic goods, were disregarded. However, his own lack of conviction to the policies guaranteed their failure from the very start. As Figures 8 1 and 8 2 show extremely low approval ratings for both Garca and the government. The same can be said about his party; in the next three elections electoral support for APRA dramatically decreased f rom 22.5 % in 1990, to 4.14 % and 1.38 % in 2000. During these elections Garca did not participate as a candidate I n 1990 there was a constitutional ban on reelection, and in 1995 and 2000 he was exiled, because a legal campaign was lau nched against him. 53 In the U.S. the New Deal lasted about 50 years. Keynesian welfare capitalism was ubiquitous in Nordic countries and industrialized democracies with social democrat ic development models. 54 In the 1989 Municipal Elections, the right ist coalition FREDEMO became the strongest political force at the national level. FREDEMO received 32 percent of the vote, APRA 20 percent, IU 18 percent and ASI 2.3 percent. capital, Lima, Ricardo Belmont, an independent who launched a new party OBRAS, became the mayor obtaining 45percent of the vote.

PAGE 358

358 Neoliberal Political Order The neoliberal order in Peru emerged as a real alternative during the 1990 election campaign and the election results marked a transformation in the thinking. The popular nationalistic order, based on state l ed development, inward orientation, and social and infrastructure investment programs that disregarded macroeconomic balance, gave way to change. In a context of crisis, the political actors who proposed economic stability, even if it meant having an unkno wn type of relationship between state and society, were granted a chance to achieve a new balance. The neoliberal political order stems from economic policies associated with the Washington Concensus. 55 However, it is much more than a set of economic polic ies. I t is a way of understanding development, the role of the state and the political ordering of With priorities shifting toward economic soundness, new policies that followed included a combination of fiscal prudence and monetary restraint, greater openness to foreign trade and investment, privatization and deregulation. Tacitly it also included financial deregulation and improved property rights (Fraga, 2004). The policy goals were economic, with financial stability as a sine qua non condition for development. There was a conviction that economic growth would translate into the social front through investment in human capital, particularly in the provision for better education 55 On one hand, the Washington Consensus was a doctrine of economic freedom that suited new Latin American democracies after the rule of military dictatorships (Williamson, 1993). On the other, it was perceived as an unjust set of policies imposed by multilateral Washington based international financial institutions (Williamson, 2002).

PAGE 359

359 and health. Eventually the trickle down effect of growth was supposed to reduce pover ty and inequality. The interventionist role of the state became reduced to one that facilitated market ians who lived impulsive president affected economic, social and political expectations, embraced the proposal of a non interventionist state. The new paradigm relied on open market s to solve the relevant development challenges and viewed any state interference in the economy with suspicion (Birdsal et al., 2010). Political Parties were no longer appealing to the electorate T heir doctrines and platforms lacked ideological cred ibility, and the new political players relied on direct appeal of the leader to the masses disregard ing party structures and stances. Instead they relied on their personal credentials whether it was charisma or a proven directly to citizens. 56 After the acute economic and social crisis of the 1980s manifested in outstanding hyperinflation, rising violence the deterioration of living conditions, lack of trust in the political class, and de legitimization of the state, Peru was prepared for change. A new 56 Kernell (1997) makes an argument concerning the tendency for American presidents to increasingly resort to "going public" or promoting themselves and their policies by appealing directly to the public for support. I believe his argument is appropriate when explaining the ways in which Latin American presidents relate to their fellow citizens. Kernell argues that this strategy is a break from pluralist explanations of behavior, asserting that presidents in the last few decades have preferred to "go public," because it offers a better prospect of succe ss than it did in the past. The result of this change is a decrease in bargaining amongst Washington leadership. Kernell utilizes case studies to demonstrate that presidential success is dependent on the ability to "go public" effectively and knowing when to use traditional bargaining methods.

PAGE 360

360 social contract with its concomitant political order and development paradigm was necessary. The Alberto Fujimori Reconstructive and Articulative P residencies (1990 2000) presidency in that he made a clean break along both organizational and political time lines of order and secular cha nge. With Fujimori, there was a categorical change in the and interest. On one hand he reduced the role of political parties in government by relying on technocrats instead; on the other he ushered a new era i n the way the state and society related. While hyperinflation and the political and social crisis called for immediate decisive action, Vargas Llosa insistence on implementing shock therapy to achieve economic stabil ization made voters fearful of his leadership. In contrast, Fujimori proposed gradual change and portrayed himself as an independent minded person absent from the political battles between the traditional parties that overwhelmed Peruvians. A skeptical ele presidency as an outsider. Lacking the support of an established political party and with the positive results of the Lima municipality in the hands of another outsider, the election of Fujimori in Ju ne 1990 came as a surprise This was especially true, because a month prior to the first round, he was virtually an unknown agronomist, dean of a private university, and a second generation Japanese immigrant. 57 During most of the 57 In the Municipal Elections of 1989, the rightist coalition FREDEMO became the strongest political force at the national level. FREDEMO received 32 percent of the vote, APRA 20 percent, IU 18 percent and ASI 2.3 per cent. FREDEMO won in most of the districts but lost in important cities. In Lima Ricardo Belmont, an independent who launched a new party OBRAS became the mayor obtaining 45 percent of the vote. Among the other candidates,

PAGE 361

361 1990 long presidential ca mpaign Mario Vargas Llosa was consistently the favorite, but not with a sufficient margin to win the election. 58 While Vargas Llosa was on the political right, and Alva Castro, there was political space in the center that Fujimori was able to fill with the support of Garca (Werlich, 1991). After the first round, in which Vargas Llosa, of the FREDEMO coalition garnered most of the vote, Fujimori, under the banner of Change 90, 59 became the beneficiary of Gar to wi n the run off. 60 exacerbated the elitist and oblivious image of the FREDEMO candidate. Fujimori was attacked for his e vangelical fellowship, his Japanese ancestry, and his seeming weakness, but his response highlighted a tradition characterized by hard work, courage and honesty Th ese were the characteristics needed for a leader in Peru at a time when there was so much h opelessness. Moreover, his campaign highlighted his connection with Japan and the possibility to obtain loans from Tokyo, as well as his warrior background with a black belt and a samurai sword. As Table 8 2 shows, the Inchaustegui of FREDEMO garner ed 27 percent of the vote, Henry Peace with IU 11.54 percent, Mercedes Cabanillas with APRA obtained 11.53, and Enrique Bernales with the Socialist Accord gained 2.16 percent. 58 The 1990 election campaign started as early as 1987 for the Peruvian political right. Opposition to Garca made Vargas Llosa the official candidate, and the most significant leader of the opposition, because was able to mobilize and get the political right behind him. For almost three years, the pre election polls pointed at Vargas Llosa as the next likely president of Peru. However, to many Peruvians Vargas Llosa seemed snobbish and distant (Tanaka, 1997). 59 Fujimori and his loyal candidates participated in other elections under different names: New Majority NM (Nueva Mayoria) in 1 995, Peru 20 00 in the 2000 elections, Yes, I t honors (Si Cumple) in 2006, and Force 2011 (Fuerza 2011). 60 Garca did not support the candidacy of Alva Castro who was his main rival inside the party. Being unable to run for re election and with the fear of losing grasp in his party, Garca actively supported Barrantes until March 1990 when polls indicated that Alva Castro started to trail Vargas Llo sa. This is when Garca shifted his support and candidacy (i.e. tax reports) t, since no one attention (Vargas Llosa 1993).

PAGE 362

362 elections result were: traditional pa rties won 68 % in the first round; Mario Vargas Llosa, running for the FREDEMO coalition garnered 32.57 % ; Fujimori with Change 90 (Ca mbio 90) received 29.09 % ; % ; and the Socialist Left (Izqui erda Socialista) of Alfonso Barrantes was divided between a 61 In the run off, Fujimori obtained 62.38 % of the vote and Vargas Llosa 37.62 % s not strong; he faced a great challenge passing legislation with an APRA and FREDEMO dominated Congress, as shown in Table 8 3. 62 With little to lose, as he was not affiliated with any political party and had no p articular allegiances to groups, and lackin g experience, a government plan, and a team that would join him in his presidency, Fujimori was able to take advantage of an opportunity for a reconstructive presidency. He dared to test the limits of what was possible in an environment where hopelessness was the rule and where any action would be better than the unbearable status quo characterized by growing violence, rampant hyperinflation, an economy in shambles and a collapsed state. The crisis stressed the accumulated problems of the old order. His imm ediate political concern was governance A t first he sought support in parties with government experience and organized his first cabinet comprised by members of other parties. Upon his inauguration, Fujimori realized he needed to implement an orthodox app roach of structural adjustment if he wanted to have a successful economic program. 63 In 61 62 APRA and the two leftist parties, IU and Socialist Party (IS) held 182 of 242. FREDEMO held 84 seats in hamber and 20 in the senate and APRA 72 seats with 53 in the lower chamber and 18 in the senate. Cambio 90 held 46 seats in total, 32 seats in the lower chamber and 14 seats in the senate. 63 This realization came as a result of his travels as president ele ct to the U.S. and Japan, where he contacted multilateral institutions that convinced him to implement a program easy to administer (Tanaka, 1997).

PAGE 363

363 order shattering opportunity to implement a new program even if it implied high costs. order shattering impulse surprise d everyone, as he broke his campaign promises only a week after his inauguration in August 1990; and enacted neoliberal reforms via shock therapy. Although initially initially Fujimori maintained significant approval ratings throughout 1990 in 1991 shock therapy for economic stabilization reversed the trend until October. 64 Although initially shock therapy caused riots, looting and social protests, by late 1991 it started to pay off, and Fujimori managed to stabilize the economy in time before his administ ration started to wear out (Tanaka, 2005). Public opinion was very positive for Fujimori from October 1991 to June 1997, his order affirming period. There was a perception that his strategy was successful in stabilizing the economy and in achieving signifi cant advances in internal security by defeating the Shining Path terrorist movement. 65 reconstructive presidency social and economic structures and their relation to t he state. As described in the previous section, he set the country on the path of the neoliberal order H is first government initiated an aggressive privatization of state companies, professionalization in the economic public sector, and implementation of liberal policies. Order and a sense of direction were welcomed by the majority of Peruvians, who valued stability in their 64 See Figure 3 Approval Rating of Alberto Fujimori as President of Peru, and Figure 4 Approval Rating of Alberto the Appendix. 65 Fujimori retired hundreds of police generals and allied with the military in order to have control in the fight ruitment became turned tougher. Perhaps the biggest victory for Fujimori after his authoritarian venture was the capture of Abimael Guzman, Shini specialized unit of the police created during the Garca government, Fujimori capitalized on it and solidified his assertive image.

PAGE 364

364 daily lives, particularly after many years of turmoil. With the help of new loans and economic growth, the state reorganized its fina nces and was able to invest in image of a charismatic leader who seemed to care and who was close to his people. 66 approval ratings peaked in April 1992 when he launched a self coup gained to power through legal means, he dissolved the national congress and unlawfully assumed extraordinary powers that would have not be possible without the coup. Contrary to what could be expected fro m someone who writes off fragile democratic institutions, the self ratings. 67 In fact it allowed him to continue with bold decisions destined to stabilize the economy and curb terrorism. This period highlights the o rder creating impulse of his presidency, although he received an overwhelmingly negative international response. 68 His high popularity allowed Fujimori to change the Constitution, extend the power of the executive and be re elected. 69 With a strong mandate, Fujimori started his second term with a strong order affirming impulse, with a carte blanche to continue governing without 66 Particularly helpful we re his frequent visits to projects and trips to remote regions, in which he personally supervised public works such as road repairs and school construction and gave the impression of a father figure. 67 From the self coup until the election of a new const ituent Congress dictatorship. For the authoritarian nature of the Fujimori administration and the consistent actions that debilitated the existent political institutions most academics and political analysts conc elected president but not one that behaved in a democratic way]. Moreover, Mainwaring and Perez Linan (2005) consider the end of the expansive democratic cycle in Latin America. 68 reinsertion to the international markets was threatened when m any international financial organizations delayed planned or projected loans ed to withdraw their support. 69 After the enormous international pressure Fujimori called for elections for a Democratic Constituent Congress (CCD) that produced a legislature that served both to craft a new constitution and as a Congress. APRA and AP boycotted the constituent assembly becaused they alleged fraud and manipulation since there were no constitutional guarantees. With a Congressional majority remained marginalized. Peruvians granted Fujimori another five years in the presidency in the 1995 elections, even though in the municipal elections of 1993, 1995 and 1998 official candidates did not make major gains in the largest cities.

PAGE 365

365 constraints. In the following months the administration issued more harsh measures against subversive activities. Under this measure, suspected guerillas and their whose members wore hoods to conceal their identities. Even though the government orism, it soon became apparent that Fujimori and Vladimiro Montesinos, his obscure political operative and head o f the National Intelligence System (SIN Sistema de Inteligencia Nacional), had pushed beyond the bounds of legality by launching a clandestine campaign of widespread human rights violations. However, it was not until November 1996 that his approval ratings reversed. 70 His increasing authoritarianism, manifested in his control of a ll four branches of government ( thanks to his formidable intelligenc e service ) extended to his decisive influence in the media, the judiciary and eventually the Constitutional Court, which gave him a legal route to a third term. Peruvians gradually started to withdraw support from him and his administration and from June 1997 his disapproval ratings were much higher than his approval ratings. This public opinion trend continued until January 2000. It was only through a massive fabricated campaign engineered by Montesinos that Fujimori was able to reach positive approval ra tings in the second half of his last year in office, eventually winning a third term. 71 In addition to this, public 70 See Figure 3 Approval Rating of Alberto Fujimori as President of Peru, and Figure 4 Approval Rating of Alberto n Appendix. 71 In preparation for the 2000 elections, Fujimori undertook socio economic programs that benefitted the poorest Peruvians. While his prudent macroeconomic policies had endeared him to the business class, once more the opposition was divided wit h nine candidates under separate banners. Intimidations to the media and targeted opposition figures were discredited by the work launched from the SIN, especially when it could not turn media into tools of the administration. As in the previous election F Congressional majority yet it was not an absolute majority. At the time, extreme abuse of state resources and control of the media through public ads, tax investigation threats, bribery and blackmail during the campaign, and signature forging and lack of transparency in the first round vote count, led the OAS observers to withdraw before

PAGE 366

366 expectations of job creation were thwarted by slowing economic growth and increasing s ocioeconomic gaps, as shown in T able 8 7. Four months i nto his third administration, a massive corruption operation recorded in thousands of videos was aired by the press I t showed Montesinos bribing Congressmen to desert the opposition and to support Fujimori. Fujimori started his third term with an adverse public opinion amid allegations of ballot rigging. 72 Angry citizens grew by the day, Fujimori called for new elections in September and tried to distance himself from Montesi nos. In a desperate attempt to save himself, in October Fujimori engaged in talks sponsored by the OAS about democratic reforms, but weeks later he flew abroad in search of protection from possible legal sanctions at home. He resigned in mid November. The Fujimori presidency is characterized as reconstructive. He was the president who inaugurated the neoliberal order in Peru, not a new era of democracy. The change in the organization of government and the relationship between state and society that followe d were of great significance since he altered the terms of prior governmental commitments and the conditions under which previously established interests were served. The transformation of the neoliberal order started with the enactment of economic polici first showed that his survival depended on immediate results in the economic realm and in his success combating terrorism. When public opinion became adverse he relied on the run off and the opposition to boycott the run off. Without a contestant in the run off Fujimori was declared by the N ational Electoral Jury (JNE) as the winner of the election. 72 See Figure 3 Approval Rating of Alberto Fujimori as President of Peru, and Figure 4 Approval Rating of Alberto ppendix A.

PAGE 367

367 Montesinos to maintain power. The order Fujimori created was not based on political institutions or higher ethical and moral goals, and it did not follow an envisioned strategy for the country. It surged as a survival mechanism of a leader who assumed office extremel y weakened, and whose ambition was to remain in power. His modernization of the state apparatus was a pragmatic action, as he needed to rely on an efficient institution in order to implement populist policies. Fujimori could have used his economic reforms simultaneously to advance social causes and to strengthen state institutions. The only institutionalized area he left was the state economic sector, which responded to the needs of the market. The dramatic fall of the Fujimori regime revealed the mixed nat populism with economic reform, as well as guile and manipulation. On one hand, there were mixed economic achievements under the appearance of a capable, efficient apparatus. He was feted a t home and abroad for his resolute commitment to market economic reform. But the s e achievements occurred under the cloud of authoritarian power relations and massive corruption. In this regard, Fujimori's political legacy in Peru is unequivocally illiberal 73 Not only did he systematically attempt to exclude his technocratic ranks but largely limited their activity to produce technical efficiency, his actions also weakened t he political system at the expense of socialization and incorporation of citizen demands through democratic channels. 73 ian political system transformed from a fragile democracy to a competitive and authoritarian regime (Levistky, 1999; Levitsky and Way, 2002, 2006, 2010), although not really cal actor, effectively discouraging political opposition and curtailing the rise of political alternatives. Furthermore, his administration also engaged in electoral fraud in the general elections of 2000.

PAGE 368

368 What is striking about Fujimori is that his authoritarianism was perceived by many Peruvians as necessary in order to stabilize the econo my and fight efficiently against terrorism. Considerations such as human and civil rights, transparency and legality were secondary to the sense of order his regime provided. Moreover, his centralism prevented decentralization and the opening of political spaces in the regions. 74 The Valentn Paniagua Articulative P residency (2000 2001) The eight month Paniagua presidency was a transitional administration that emerged as a tempor With the presidency and the Congress badly tarnished, the AP Congressman rose to power based on his personal reputation. Paniagua and his brief administration helped to bring democratic procedures and institutions to the forefront of reform I t also started judicial and court reform and engaged efficiently in filing corruption charges, bringing to light the obscure dealings of the Fujimori regime and investigating human right s abuses. How ever, the steps taken during his eight month administration pointed toward practical solutions and agreements for the short term. The Paniagua presidency was a continuation of the neoliberal order, and in this sense it was an articulative presidency. He d id not project a political alternative; H e knew his task had an expiration date, although he was a candidate for the 2001 elections. He did not impugn his own mandate, and his reputation as a decent man 74 In 2005 Fujimori was detained in Chile; in 2007 he was extradited to Peru to face trial, the same year he was sentenced to six years in jail for abuse of power. In 2009 he was found guilty of human rights abuses and corruption and sentenced to 25 years in prison. Alberto Fujimori was considered one of t he most powerful men in Peru i n the last thirty years, after businessman Dionisio Romero and Alan Garca who was second (El Poder en el Peru, 1980 2011). More recently, one of the issues that divided voters in the 2011 polarized presidential election was the announcement by Keiko Fujimori, the daughter of the former presid ent, that she would pardon her father if she were elected president.

PAGE 369

369 who did not have ambition s of political power for hi mself remained untouched. He helped to enhance the relationship between the state and society by restoring credibility to government. His legacy is one of political institutions; he brought back credibility to the government by appointing a cabinet of prom inent Peruvians, and he pushed for transparency laws in government action as well as national reconciliat ion. These were not minor tasks, but they did not shake the nature of the political order already in place. Paniagua accomplished his objectives while he received wide public support. 75 His administration lived a honeymoon period as the political elites and society groups rallied behind him. Paniagua did what he was assigned to do H e called general elections that allowed the return to multiparty politic al competition and pluralism. After regionalization in preparation for the 2002 regional municipal and provincial elections. Traditional parties reemerged with APRA in the center, AP and PPC on the right, and the party system remained dramatically weak (T anaka, 1998, 2005; Levitsky and Cameron, 2003; Kenney, 2003). The Alejandro Toledo Articulative P residency (2001 2006) During the 2001 presidential campaign p oliticians lived in fear of appearing on TV. For months, Peruvians had watched videos of Congress men from each party accepting bribes from Montesinos, along some of the corrupt politicians were also journalists and businessmen. Discredit was widespread in the eyes of the electorate and almost all politicians were presumed guilty. The campaign was abo ut credibility as 75 See Figure 5 Approval Rating of Valentn Paniagua as President of Peru in Appendix.

PAGE 370

370 well as capability to continue the economic path traced by Fujimori. The preferred candidates were Alejandro Toledo with his party Possible Peru (PP Per Posible) and Lourdes Flores, the former Christian democrat Congresswoman from PPC le ading the National Unity (UN Unidad Nacional) coalition. Toledo was the strongest candidate from early polls. His participation in the first round of the 2000 rigged elections and his refusal to participate in the run off made him the front runner the fo llowing year. Moreover, Toledo had no ties to any established party and remained the most vocal politician after his challenge of Fujimori. Most of the campaign happened amid name calling and scandalous personal revelations between Toledo and Flores. Amids t these confrontations, the APRA candidate, Alan Garca benefited as his campaign skillfully defined Toledo and Flores as leftist and rightist, respectively, placing Garca in the middle. 76 This smart move proposals aimed to portray him as an assured, restrained and experienced candidate, who had made mistakes before as President, but who learned from them and was the most prepared candidate as a result. The election results of the first round were surprisi ng, as Garca received more votes than Flores by just over 1 % Although he did n ot eventually win the run comeback as a politician was astonishing. Peruvians were left to choose between an experienced candidate with an awful past and a n inexperienced candidate. Because of 76 coup in April 1992 government forces pursued of Garca to arrest him and prosecute him for corruption charges. Garca escaped and went into hiding, eventually making his way to Colombia. He lived in by the corruption cases that hunted him during his absence. Throughout the Fujimori regime, Garca came to personalize corruption as several charges were filed against him and multiple investigations were opened primary while he was in exile. He alleged that the various charges against him were false and politically motivated. The opportunity to return to Peru came precisely because of the way the Fujimori regime fell. Garca ran for president after the courts ruled in his favor, and after Congress repealed t

PAGE 371

371 rewarded with the presidency. By the time Toledo assumed office, the honeymoon period that Paniagua enjoyed was coming to an end There was a need for a long term vision for the years to come. While Peruvians expected effective leadership to get Peru back on track, Toledo did not provide a plan for government. What Toledo promised during the presidential campaign was an intense war on poverty, and he did not seize the opportunity of the political moment. The positive experience, during the Paniagua administration of reaching responsible political agreements among the political elite and other influential sectors of society prompted Toledo to call a National Accord to establish the long term goals for Peru. From 2001 to 2002, the government, political parties, private sector, labor interests, the Catholic Church and other society groups were engaged in the development of a strategy t hat established priorities for the next twenty years in the areas of democracy, justice, competitiveness and transparency. If at first this was a positive action, as time passe d the population became increasingly impatient. Peruvians did not wait to make l ong held demands and Toledo faced increasing protests as society groups pressured the government to provide solutions to their needs. 77 The Toledo presidency was a set of trials and errors. T he inherent impulses of a presidency were at best inconsequentia l, since Toledo himself was an irresolute president. The order shattering impulse was at the best, weak. Toledo did not want to break with the legacy of Paniagua, since it provided the only institutional framework the country had, and he did not want to a 77 Garay and Tanaka (2009) assert that the highest number of protests in Peru occurred during the Toledo administration with 2002 as the year with worst labor related protests. The most co nflictive years were 2003 and 2005, as protests against his economic model reached a peak.

PAGE 372

372 neoliberalism was the only option he considered to be available at the time. He was not a populist president either, as he was interested in being accepted by the elite, more than on relating to the masses. Unlik e U.S. President Eisenhower, whose seeming lack o f in active leadership (Greenstein, 1982), Toledo was indeed an apathetic president who let his mostly capable cabinet gov ern while he spen t considerable time and energy dealing with personal issues. There was disenchantment with the economic model, economic performance in a context of int ernational crisis. Lacking a plan, but trying to order affirming impulse, as it did not want to disturb the existing economic and political arrangements. The Toledo administrati on was plagued by personal scandals, personal disputes and allegations of corruption H e asserted his authority with an incorrect idea of what presidential authority is, using it to defend personal feuds instead of leading the country. Disenchantment with Toledo grew quickly; only five months into his administration Toledo disapproval ratings were much higher that his approval ratings, a tendency that remained for the rest of his term. 78 as his lack of organization and vision, did not contribute to a firm stand in government and it prevented him from giving reign to order creating impulses. These characteristics early in his presidency. Toledo had to rely on the opposition and his feeble block in Congress to launch liberal economic policies and the long overdue decentralization 78 See Figure Approval Rating of Alejandro Toledo as President of Peru in Appendix.

PAGE 373

373 process. In the first regional and municipal elections of 2002, the p poor electoral perf ormance as shown in T able 8 4. 79 Given the internal problems of the impression that the stability of the political system depended not on institutions or ship but on the opposition leader Alan Garca and his chance to sense that party leaders proposed and negotiated state institutional reforms, agreed on passing key le gislation, especially laws aimed at furthering trade and commerce and at keeping the economy growing steadily, as well as transparency laws. 80 When the opposition took control of Congress after the internal elections in July of 2004, it s party, the PP, was on the verge of disintegration. 81 Moreover, leading some analysts to believe that democracy would collapse again. 82 ical scandals and corrupt activities, at the economic level it was diligent in opening opportunities for order creating actions. As shown in Table 8 5, during the Toledo administration the ec onomy grew steadily by over 5 % annually from 2002 to 2006. Particularly important were the efforts 79 PRA controlled 12 independent regional groupings seven, and the left leaning Unin por el Per (UPP) two. Nuevo Izquierda, Somos Per and the Frente Independiente Moralizador (FIM ) each won one region. Unidad Nacional won the Lima Municipality. For Toledo this was unwelc ome news, because it meant the strengthening of APRA, not only as the main opposition in Congress but also at the regional and municipal level. 80 Between 2001 and 2006 Congress maintained a legislative initiative producing 80 percent of the laws and delega ting legislative faculties only twice (Moron and Sanborn, 2007: 57). 81 Peru Posible lost control of the leadership of Congress after the resignation from the party of two of its founding members, thereby reducing its Congressional representation to 36, 11 fewer than in 2001. 82 Toledo narrowly survived impeachment in May 2005 when Congress was prompted to vote against him. A order to register Peru Posible for the 2000 elections.

PAGE 374

374 leading to free trade agreements with the United States, Common Southern Market (MERCOSUR Mercado Comn del Sur), the Andean Community, and Thailand For the 2006 elections, once again t he party in government showed its weakness by not being able to present a presidential candidate. PP invited two independents to run for office but, given the lack of unity and pressures from the party, they eventuall y backed down. 83 The Toledo presidency benefited from fluky events that happened almost Toledo was better by default H e presided over five consecutive years of economi c growth in a favorable international environment with no question s about his democratic party falsified signatures to register as a legal party back in 2000, was not in fluenced by government was able to receive an apology from Chile, which sold guns to help Ecuador during the brief border war with Peru in 1995. These propitious ev ents allowed him to survive to complete his term. articulative of the political order in place; he did not move from the political frame established by those before him. He left basic commitments of ideology intact, even with a disc for long term economic growth and poverty reduction. 83 In December of 2005, only five days after Jeannete Emanuel Tejada became the official PP candidate, she backed down. Carlos Bruce, the candidate for the first vice presidency, also resigned after receiving criticisms from the first vice president David Waisman. Another announced presidential candidate, Rafael Belaunde Aubry, also resigned

PAGE 375

375 him to manage a steadily growing economy which benefited the usual powerful interests while redistributing little. Although he put together a capable team, he failed to construct managerial capability for the government; his vision was for the short term. Th e trickle down effect was hardly felt by the lower segments of society. Like Fujimori, Toledo defended and propelled market principles taking a step further by pushing for free trade agreements and preparing the country to become a player in the global ma rkets. With regard to the state, beyond the successful decentralization with the elections of regional and provincial authorities, the intention to undertake a profound reform was abandoned. There were a few areas where professional officials were able to increase efficiency and transparency, but the state failed as provider of services and safety network. The Alan Garca A rticulative P residency (2006 2011) articulative presidency is characterized b authority structure while being embedded to a resilient political order T his is precisely antithesis of his first disjun ctive presidency. Structural conditions were different than in Garca I, and Garca was able to read the times i n the light of their own term, he seemed to have learned from the past and strived not to repeat the same mistakes In the 2006 general electi ons, there were twenty candidates competing for the presidency. While this number reflected political pluralism it also confirmed party fragmentation. From the start, the main contenders who enjoyed name recognition and solid party backing were Lourdes Fl ores Nano of the right wing National Unity Party

PAGE 376

376 (UN) and Alan Garca with the APRA. But Ollanta Humala of the Peruvian Nationalist Party (PNP Partido Nacionalista Peruano) who ran under the banner of For Perus Union (UPP Union por el Per ) became the surprise candidate, as he quickly rose in the polls starting in December 2005 (McClintock, 2006). The challenge for the presidential candidates was to bridge a divided society. There was an emphasis on nal and cultural levels. On one hand, there w ere Lima, its surroundings, and the north coast that were more prospero us, modern, and racially whiter. O n the other, there were the poorer, marginalized and more indigenous Amazonic and southern regions. The la tter regions supported Ollanta Humala and other leftist candidates, while for the former supported the systemic and pro market candidates. Alan Garca was the charismatic contender with a difficult past, and Peruvians were very wary of him. Garca campaig ned on the premise that he was a different man, apparent maturity of a fifty year old politician, a state reformer and a committed social democrat Luiz Incio Lula da Silva seemed upright and reliable. He was quick to acknowledge the mistakes of his first presidency, and he promised to pursue more careful and moderate economic policies, especially to prevent inflation. He also explained that he had changed his thinking in the era of economic globalization, having realized the need to reassure international investment n an interview just before the first round. The Garca campaign was skillful in branding Flores as the candidate of the rich and in

PAGE 377

377 raising the fear of instability if Humala were to become president. 84 Garca displaced Flores to third place in the first rou nd, making him eligible for the run off. The campaign was dominated by an atmosphere of disillusionment with government, and the rise of Humala to near victory signaled growing discontent with the prevailing political system of the contemporary ruling clas s. Furthermore, not only were voters disenchanted with an economic growth that did not produce visible results in poverty alleviation, but Peruvians were also clearly affected by six years of scandals during the Fujimori and Toledo presidencies. After a l ong and bitter campaign, the choices at stake in the run off between wither continuation with the current path or stepping into the unknown. With a recent history of authoritarianism, and the accusation that received funds from nt Chavez, Garca came to represent the political order in place, while Humala represented a radical change. articulative from the start. 85 In the run off, Garca became the anti populist candidate who, by def ault was supported by the elite who had supported Flores in the first round; they had no choice but give him a chance. During the campaign he acknowledged mistakes during his first gov ernment. H owever many questioned his sincerity, particularly after Gar ca made strenuous efforts to maintain an ambiguous stance against the free trade agreement with the US; saying he was skeptical and advocat ing for a re evaluation of the agreement. Although 84 Humala had campaigned calling for a constituent assembly to write a new constitution and to change the rules of the game. 85 Humala was the populist outsider, who stood for a doc t rine so called ethno cacerism which was racist in nature He sought a vindication of nationalistic principles and called fo r the return of strategic industries and natural resources to state management. His liberal democratic credentials were dubious, particularly coming from a military tradition and accused of human rights violations in the 1990s, and for leading a military u prising in 2000 against Fujimori.

PAGE 378

378 it was not clear where he stood on many issues, Garca made clear he was not a Chavez sympathizer. At the time 86 and like s of left leaning candidates, such as Evo Morales in Bolivia in 2005, and the enormous amount of attention to leftist candidates that extend ed to Ecuador with Rafael Correa and Daniel Ortega in Nicaragua. 87 ontrast, instead of a win based on his own weight. Unlike his successful run in 1985, and like his unsuccessful run in 2001, in 2006 Garca was far from controlling the events that eventually le d to his victory. Fear and the economic scenario helped him wi n, but his mandate was fragile. When he took office he needed to strengthen the economy and the market oriented policies to prove to his once unlikely supporters that they did not make a mistake. Garca was fearful himself, but his fear was that he woudl b e seen as the same person he was in the past. Garca started his second presidency with auspicious circumstances. As table 8 price of the commodities Peru exported were on the rise. However, Peruvians were yearning for more jobs and to see the benefits of growth in their daily lives. At the social level there was growing social discontent for the lack of attention to services, especially in the education and health sectors. As Figure 8 2 shows Garca started his administration in a weak position, with relatively low approval ratings, and a honeymoon period of about a year. With a 58 % of 86 See Weintraub (2006). 87 Rafael Correa was elected at the end of 2006 and assumed office in January 2007. Ortega was elected in 2007.

PAGE 379

379 approval rating, Garca tried to move quickly to demonstrate that he was about to preside over a different administration than his first, with a different leadership project and orientation. As shown in Figure 8 3 he started his second administration with much lower ratings than those of any other president at the start of his term. H e also tried to portray himself as moderate, and as a changed man. In this regard, his order shattering impulse was an effort to vindicate from his own past and to mark a contrast with his predecessor. The contrast with Toledo was stark; while Peruvians pe rceived Toledo as on top of the political game, with many initiatives and at the political center stage. After he was declared the winner of the 2006 presidential election and before his inauguration, Garca sought to gain legitimacy, among Peruvians as well as his immediate peers in other countries. 88 Once in office, Garca realized he needed to garner allies in Congress as shown in Table 8 3 of the seats by party for the 2006 election. Although APRA (2006 2011) Nacional (UN) and in the pro Fujimori Congressmen of Alliance for the Future ( Alianza por el Futuro ) in order to pass legislation an d gain the needed majority. Opposition forces in Congress were not strong A fter the collapse of the party system under Fujimori, party discipline was weak, and due to the personal zeal of certain individuals, tions at the domestic and international levels aimed at constructing an image of a president who compromised with the 88 Garca traveled to Brazil, Chile, Colombia and Ecuador and met with the presidents. His trips aimed to garner political support from his peers, as well as to assure them his democratic credentials and his willingness to contribute to regional peace and economic development.

PAGE 380

380 neoliberal order, an indication of his order affirming impulses. While he differed from Toledo in his style, in terms of content and the i nterests he represented his administration was an extension. As shown in Figure 8 3 divided into four stages: the honeymoon period from his inauguration until June 2007, this is when the order shatte ring and order affirming impulses were manifested more the negative ratings surpassed the positive ratings; the period starting in June 2009 with social conflicts in th e Amazonic region of Bagua; 89 and the second half of 2010, when his approval ratings began to improve only to go down again in March 2011, when he made unfortunate comments over the election. In the last two stages his meager order creating impulses were m ostly articulated. During the honeymoon period Garca sought to give assurance, as exemplified by his inaugural speech, in which he was careful not to give frightful announcements as he did in his first presidency. He pledged to maintain macroeconomic mana gement, to continue the positive economic growth trend by boosting investment and production, and to make Peru a competitive country. While his discourse aimed to calm citizens, his supporters and investors about the direction of the economy, as he had re peatedly said during the campaign, his second presidency aimed to be revealing his affiliation with a structure of authority that was already in place. He also declared the four major emphases of his administration: state reform thr ough fiscal 89 Police and indigenous forces clashed over the approval of regul ation of the use of amazonic resources

PAGE 381

381 austerity measures, decentralization, cut of red tape, and transparency; 90 poverty reduction through creation of jobs and opportunities for investment; increase of social opportunities by implementing policies targeted to specific groups (women children, youth) ; and security by increasing citizen security policies. Garca learned from Toledo that instead of qualified party colleagues, he needed technocrats in his cabinet and in key government positions. Toledo appointed independent technocra ts of rightist orientation to manage the economy and leftist professionals for social issues T he latter became critics and opposition once they left their posts. (Tanaka, 2008). Garca appointed a 16 member cabinet, which included 9 independent profession als, 6 APRA ministers including the Prime Minister, and a minister from the conservative party PRN. 91 If in his first administration he governed using advice from friends, in the second he was more isolated, he made little effort to reach out except to f ew people with key economic posts. 92 Garca avoided appointing independent professionals with leftist leanings in the social sectors to avoid criticisms, particularly since many of them were promoters of human rights trials for violations committed during G first administration These appointments denied the possibility to implement important social reforms (Tanaka, 2008). solved and to see the promises become reality. A series of protests started in 2007, 90 He announced immediate executive proposals for Congress to pass in order to reduce the salaries of the president, his ministers and other governmental salaries such as Congressmen. 91 A complete list of ca binet members can be found in the Appendix. 92 Some of the interviewees for this dissertation pointed out that in his second government Garca did not have a close group of advisers or party loyalists as he did in his first term. Among his informal adviser s in the second term, there were businessmen who were personal friends of Garca. They did not represent big business but they provided a view on the private sector and the economy. This is particularly relevant since it signals that Garca was alone in th e decision making process.

PAGE 382

382 oriented and US friendly stance started by Alberto Fujimori and maintained by Toledo. Some critics asserted that his vision of the state was deliberately racist and that infrastructure projects were preferred over social policy. 93 While Fujimori built schools and health posts, Garca preferred more ambitious and l arger scale schemes, such as roads, ports, massive irrigation developments and natural resource exploitation projects. addressed other aspects such as education, effectively curbing the once powerful teachers union. He worked to attract domestic and international investment grade for Peru but the administration also passed several laws that curbed the right to protest, that lifted responsibility from police action in confron activities. These added to several corruption scandals in the executive and in Congress, erod ing support for Garca and his government. exc eeding positive, Garca sought to rally Peruvians to his cause and plan for exacerbated reformist voluntarism to hyper administration economically conservative poorly ambitious and with no impetus for redistribution at the social level (Tanaka, 2008). Garca renewed the political project that considered capitalist leanings as the only acceptable way to greater levels of development. The role of the state as market facilitator was to a large extent also a 93

PAGE 383

38 3 vision of development that imposed a capitalist/globalizing state discourse over the backwa rd environmentalist/protectionist anti not moderate; he wrote a series of newspaper articles that portrayed his lack of and identifying them as those whose backward mentality went against progress and improvement. He saw his interests and those of his constituency threatened by the views of the indigenous, human rights advocates and environmentalists who joined forces to obstr uct the path of his development friendly leadership project. Garca the point of the protest. Peruvians, like the indigenous of the Amazonic region, who had traditionall y been out of the scope of the state, expressed their frustration with the way the central government handled the resources in the region. They were not consulted when the central administration passed laws to increase exploitation of natural resources, an d the lives of the population living in the areas of exploitation were overtaken by the effects of mining, logging, and hydrocarbons. Protesters opposed t he use and distribution of resources that pertained directly to them. During 2008 and 2009 social di reinforce liberal economic policies and to promote businesses interests. Protestors the people. The third phase of his sec ond administration started in June 2009 with the violent confrontation in the Amazonic region of Bagua. This was the pinnacle of the tensions between the of development. The latter did not ide ntify with the political system and did not see the

PAGE 384

384 benefits of the economic growth proudly touted by the Fujimori, Toledo and Garc a administrations. As shown in F igures 8 3 and 8 5, Garca and his government respectively were not able to recover positi ve ratings for the rest of his term. Moreover other protests against administration policies included strikes, marches and road blockades in other regions of Peru: Moquegua (2008 and 2009), Quillabamba (2010), Puno (2010 and 2011), Arequipa (2010 and 2011 ), Cuzco and Piura (2008 2010) and the use of their natural resources, such as water and land, and over the distribution of royalties and future state income. Despite t he ongoing tensions between the two visions of development, the once seemingly insurmountable political and economic problems of the past seemed to be ameliorated. A comparison of public opinion at the beginning and end of the Garca administration demonst rated a sizable shift in public sentiment starting in 2006. While poverty and inequality remained a challenge, the most important pressing issues in public opinion changed from employment and poverty to corruption and citizen insecurity. 94 While the latter involved delinquency and gun violence, the sources of insecurity involved more complex phenomena such as a dysfunctional political culture, corruption, lack of civility, institutional weakness, and social polarization. Garca presided over a period of a gr owing economy and prosperity, but inequality was not reduced significantly. As Table 8 7 shows, the GINI coefficient was 49.5 in 2006, by 2009 it was almost 2 % lower. At the end of his presidency there was a booming economy with soaring commodity prices, GDP growth, rising incomes, and poverty reduced from 45 to 31 % However, no significant social policies had been implemented 94 See Ipsos Apoyo mont h ly polls (2006 2010)

PAGE 385

385 T a conditional cash transfer program, was a timid public policy considering the cou Despite economic growth the Peruvian state remained weak during the Garca administration. S tate weakness was also persistent given the independence of technocrats from parties and the state. There were management of the economy and monetary policy, but the technocrats were orthodox and emphasized the functionality of the market with little commitment to the solution of social needs (Tanaka, 2011). During the Garca admini stration, Peru also enjoyed relative political stability, but the distortion or extinction of moral welfare and ethics were as negative as inequality. Garca did not create a culture of trust and respect for the rule of law, and overall the corruption and abuse of state power continued. The presidential election of 2011 showed once again a polarized country, between regions and between rich and poor. For most of the 2011 election campaign, it was almost unthinkable for observers (Tanaka, 2011; Levitsky, 20 11) to envision the run off candid ates Keiko Fujimori and Humala, favored strengthening the state. According to Levitsky (2011), in general state weakness has been the root discontent and the reason they expressed their rejection of the establishment. In this social demands was not accomplished. Dissatisfaction with democrati c institutions remained high in Peru compared to other Latin American countries (Levitsky, 2011). If democracy is to deepen, the ones that were in most need of the rule of law and

PAGE 386

386 institutions are the poor. The democratic agenda for the subsequent presiden cy under Humala included once again the strengthening of the state, with transparent decision making in all areas of the public sector. As opposed to his first disjunctive articulative Garca continued to enforc e neoliberal order, to the point that he seemed a completely different president when it came to defending the guiding principles of the distinct political, economic, and cultural trends of the neoliberal order, the pursuit of free market policies in a glo resilience to high inequality. During his term, the state engineered policies that were implemented from the top down, and did not upset the traditional structures of power allied with APRA. 95 Gar through revolution or reform; it was a mere adaptation to the order in current time. He tackled issue by issue with a pro market mentality, instead of adhering explicitly to the neoliberal ord er. Perhaps that was his biggest mistake: failure to provide a future society as an alternative to the liberal Peruvian capitalist society. Even more, he discredited those who questioned the order and sought an alternative to neoliberalism as the only type of capitalism. Discus sion This chapter has shown that the two Garca administrations fit two different political orders. Moreover, it showed that the ingrained impulses of all presidencies 95 Not only did APRA made an ideological transition to the political right during the 1990s, there were also common interests with pro Fujimori forces. Even though Garca lived in exile during the Fujimori years, starting in 1998 widely published rumors of ar rangements between Garca and pro Fujimori operatives were aired (See ) At the end of the 1990s it was speculated that Fujimori would allow Ga out corruption charges against h im, and later Fujimori by providing him privileges that improved his jail conditions.

PAGE 387

387 result in different politics that presidents make within the rise and fall of a political order. This applicability becomes clearer when the Garca administrations are compared with those that came before and after his. All other administrations were part of only one place in different stages in the li ves of two political orders. political order. While Belaun as it took place when the order was resi s Garca encountered an order in decay that he was temporarily able to bring back to life by purposely trying to revive it on his own terms. Indeed, G arca failed to exploit the reconstructive opportunities that were initially handed to him when he encountered enervated political conditions. 96 Garca did not realize that political will was not suff icient to make his project work. B y insisting o n the curr ency of his project he contributed to add uncertainty to an already difficult situation. Garca was the disjunctive president, as no other, who demonstrated that pressing the most extensive warrants imaginable for independent action, even with his great p opularity he could not simply revamp his leadership project at will. He committed political suicide in his effort to jump over the limits of his initial warrants for action and assume a reconstructive posture. His first presidency was a failure precisely because he tried to renew the order with a coalition of interests whose political project was no longer appropriate because the guiding ideas did not suit reality and the conditions for its implementation had changed dramatically. The impact of 96 work (Nichols and Myers 2010).

PAGE 388

388 ecisions for democracy was severe, as he alienated those who could have helped to create a new project. He enacted erratic policies that responded timidly to the spiral of economic turmoil H needed p ainful economic policies, which would have required his administration to stop legitimacy, as he reached the point where his political maneuvers were exceeded by econom ic deterioration; with hyperinflation no populist policies could compensate for the lost stability. As we know, missed conditions for reconstructive leadership do not disappear; they remain available for others, in this case for Fujimori, to exploit (Nich ols and Myers, to acquiesce to the critical economic circumstances at the expense of democracy. ies were all articula tive and embedded in the neoliberal political order. brief presidency and reinforced by Tole when the political order was resilient H owever there have been signs of erosion, as the model of development and the state itself were contested. In his second presidency Garca became affiliated with the coa lition of interests that were in place and powerful. Garca learned to adapt to those interests to maintain the status quo Toledo and Garca did not mak e major reforms to the political order in place T hey re sponded to immediate needs and continued the p olicies that overemphasized

PAGE 389

389 markets. Each sought to transform the country without changing its politics. As affiliated leaders in a robust order, they both grappled with the problem of trying to coordinate change. s, Garca has been the only president who transited two distinct orders and who identified completely with them at two can transit the politics of a country in two p olitical orders, and disrupt its politics differently each time, is extraordinary to say the least. Skowronek has not encountered such a case in the history of the United S tates, to my understanding, nor has he mentioned this possibility for other countrie s. From all the presidents studied in depth, as well as the other presidents that provide context in this dissertation, Alan Garca is the only one who fit this transitional model. The next chapter, takes the analysis to an agent level to understand the pe rsonality traits that allowed Garca to make this transition.

PAGE 390

390 Table 8 1. Peru Presidents, types of presidencies and political orders (1980 2011) Years President Type of presidency Political order 1980 1985 Fernando Belaunde Preemptive Popular national istic 1985 1990 Alan Garca Disjunctive Popular nationalistic 1990 2000 Alberto Fujimori Reconstructive Neoliberal 2000 2001 Valentn Paniagua Articulative Neoliberal 2001 2006 Alejandro Toledo Articulative Neoliberal 2006 2011 Alan Garca Articulati ve Neoliberal Table 8 2 Peru vote share by party in presidential elections 1980 2006 (in percentages) Party 1980 1985 1990 1990 1995 2000 2000 2001 2001 2006 2006 I II I II I II I II APRA 27.24 53.10 22.50 4.14 1.38 25.89 46.92 24.37 52.63 A P 1 44.93 7.25 1.70 0.42 5.76 UPP 21.64 0.33 30.67 47.37 PPC 2 9.58 11.90 IU 2.93 24.69 8.20 0.58 Cambio 90 3 29.09 62.38 64.61 49.87 74.33 7.45 PP 4 3.27 40.24 25.67 36.51 53.08 FREDEMO 5 32.57 37.62 UN 24.30 23.86 PRT 4.03 UIR 3.37 UDP 2.47 IS 4.74 FIM 9.86 RES.NAC. 4.39 Other 5.46 3.06 2.88 4.57 7.75 3.55 3.50 Source: Oficina Nacional de Procesos Electorales (ONPE), Tuest a (2001) 1 Run as Frente de Centro (FC) in 2006 2 Run as Convergencia Democrtica (CODE) in 1985 3 Changed names in different elections; Cambio 90 (1990) Nueva Mayora/Cambio 90 (1995) Per 2000 Alianza por el Futuro (2006) 4 CODE and Pas Posible were an alliance in 2000 which changed name to Per Posible 5 Run as an alliance between AP, PPC and Movimiento Libertad

PAGE 391

391 Table 8 3 Peru Seats by party ( 1980 2006 ) 1980 1985 1990 1995 2000 2001 2006 Party Deput Senat e Deput Senate 1 Depu t Senat e 2 Congress* APRA 58 18 107 32 53 18 8 6 28 36 AP 98 26 10 6 4 3 3 5 UPP 17 3 6 45 PPC 10 6 7 5 IU 16 6 2 Cambio 90 32 14 67 52 3 13 PP 12 7 29 45 2 FREDEMO 63 20 UN 17 17 IS 4 3 FIM 7 9 11 FREPAP 6 2 AVANCEMOS 3 3 SP 7 4 SN 4 Left Parties** 12 9 43 16 1 Other 2 1 1 5 1 8 2 2 2 Source: Jurado Nacional de Elecciones (JNE), Oficina Nacional de Procesos Electorales (ONPE), Dietz (1986), Tanaka (1998), Tanak a (2001) *The 1993 constitution established a single chamber Congress. **Leftist parties with small share of votes and Congressional representation. 1 The 1979 constitution established the former presidents became senator for life. Fernando Belaunde becam e senator for life after serving his 1980 1985term. 2 Alan Garca became senator for life after serving his 1985 1990 term.

PAGE 392

392 Table 8 4 Peru Vote share by party in municipal and regional elections 1980 2010 (in percentages) Municipal Regional Party 1980 1983 1986 1989 1993 1995 1998 2002 2006 2010 APRA 22.49 33.08 47.13 19.74 11.67 4.94 24.1 18.8 9.5 IU 23.33 28.95 30.53 17.86 4.02 AP 35.74 17.45 12.33 5.07 4.64 5.9 2 2.8 PPC 11.05 13.86 14.63 5.3 0.12 FREDEMO 31.61 ASI 2.29 FNTC 3.26 2.77 MOV.IZ. 0.48 SL 20.4 2.3 4.4 CAMBIO 90 18.8 24.74 SP 25.45 6.2 0.5 1.9 UPP 2.89 5.6 3.7 0.9 UN 8.6 4.5 3 PP 13.5 1.6 3 FD 3.1 3.2 PNP 8.6 5.4 Other 7.39 6.66 3.85 28.51 37.38 11.1 14.8 14.2 Independent 3.86 25.56 52.79 37.34 21.9 40 54.9 Source: Tuesta (2001), ONPE (2005). ONPE various years. Tanaka and Guibert ( 2011). Includes other parties and independent political organizations

PAGE 393

393 Table 8 5 Peru Economic performance variables: e conomic activity, fiscal sector and inflation (1981 2011) (in percentages) Year GDP growth Deficit/Superavit (of GDP) Public expenditure (of GDP) Inflation growth 1981 5.50 3.91 N/A 72.70 1982 0.3 0 6.73 N/A 72.90 1983 9.30 7.36 N/A 125.10 1984 3.80 9.88 N/A 111.40 1985 2.10 6.16 N/A 158.30 1986 12.10 2.40 N/A 62.90 1987 7.70 4.95 N/A 75.00 1988 9.40 6.51 N/A 585.71 1989 13.40 5.83 N/A 3409.03 1990 5.10 8 .72 2.08 7478.55 1991 2.11 2.80 9.30 409.53 1992 0.43 3.90 16.08 73.53 1993 4.77 3.08 23.45 48.58 1994 12.82 2.80 33.00 23.74 1995 8.61 3.22 40.71 11.13 1996 2.52 1.08 42.75 11.55 1997 6.86 0.07 45.35 8.55 1998 0.66 0.99 47.40 7.26 1999 0 .91 3.22 51.98 3.47 2000 2.95 3.32 57.94 3.76 2001 0.22 2.48 54.38 1.98 2002 5.02 2.25 56.12 0.19 2003 4.04 1.72 59.97 2.26 2004 4.98 1.03 65.98 3.66 2005 6.83 0.30 73.93 1.62 2006 7.74 2.07 82.28 2.00 2007 8.91 3.16 90.61 1.78 2008 9.80 2. 22 105.93 5.79 2009 0.86 1.88 114.55 2.94 2010 8.80 0.60 128.42 1.53 2011* 6.20 0.90 131.60 3.30 *Estimated values Source: Economist Intelligence Unit

PAGE 394

394 Table 8 6 Peru Electoral data in presidential elections 1980 2006 Year Eligible voters EV Inc rease in EV Valid votes Blank Null Total cast Absenteeism 1980 6,471,105 77.13% 7.88% 15.00% 79.97% 20.03% 1985 8,333,433 22.35% 86.16% 6.53% 7.31% 90.54% 9.46% 1990(I) 10,013,225 16.78% 84.72% 8.00% 7.28% 78.13% 21.87% 1990(II) 10,007,614 90.45% 1.95% 7.60% 79.52% 20.48% 1995 11,974,396 16.38% 82.09% 9.17% 8.75% 73.52% 26.48% 2000(I) 14,567,468 17.80% 91.88% 5.87% 2.25% 82.83% 17.17% 2000(II) 14,567,467 68.88% 1.19% 29.93% 81.00% 19.00% 2001(I) 14,906,233 2.27% 86.44% 10.2 8% 3.28% 82.28% 17.72% 2001(II) 14,906,233 86.19% 2.75% 11.06% 81.37% 18.63% 2006(I) 16,494,906 9.63% 83.89% 11.87% 4.23% 88.71% 11.29% 2006(II) 16,494,906 91.48% 1.09% 7.43% 87.71% 12.29% Source: Jurado Nacional de Elecciones (JNE), Oficina Nacional de Procesos Electorales (ONPE), Tuesta (2001) Figure 8 1. Peru Approval ratings of Alan Garca as p resident of Peru during his first presidency (1985 1990) Source: APOYO Opinin y Mercado S.A Peru, 1987 1990

PAGE 395

395 Figure 8 2. Peru Appr 1990) Source : APOYO Opinin y Mercado S.A Peru, 1985 1990

PAGE 396

396 Table 8 7. Peru Economic performance variables: population, employment and income (1981 2011) Year Population (millions) Unempl oyment (% ) GDP per capita ($US) GDP growth per capita (%) 1981 17.18 N/A N/A 1982 17.64 N/A N/A 3.00 1983 18.12 N/A N/A 11.70 1984 18.59 N/A N/A 1.20 1985 19.06 N/A N/A 0.40 1986 19.51 N/A N/A 9.50 1987 19.96 N/A N/A 5.30 1988 20.42 N/A N/A 11.50 1989 20.89 N/A 1,992.70 15.40 1990 21.38 8.30 1,355.30 0.01 1991 21.88 5.90 1,579.00 0.24 1992 22.39 9.40 1,611.60 2.71 1993 22.91 9.90 1,520.80 2.41 1994 23.42 8.80 1,917.40 10.33 1995 23.84 8.30 2,251.40 6. 72 1996 24.26 7.10 2,303.40 0.74 1997 24.68 7.70 2,395.80 5.03 1998 25.10 7.80 2,260.70 2.33 1999 25.53 8.00 2,019.70 0.75 2000 25.94 7.40 2,056.20 1.31 2001 26.35 9.23 2,047.90 1.34 2002 26.75 8.90 2,122.60 3.44 2003 27.15 9.70 2,260.00 2.50 2 004 27.55 8.80 2,530.30 3.46 2005 27.95 7.60 2,840.70 5.30 2006 28.35 7.50 3,256.50 6.21 2007 28.75 7.00 3,730.80 7.38 2008 29.15 8.10 4,352.50 8.29 2009 29.56 8.90 4,300.00 0.50 2010 29.96 6.60 5,140.00 7.30 2011* 30.36 7.10 5,640.00 4.80 Estim ated values Source: Economist Intelligence Unit

PAGE 397

397 Figure 8 3. Peru Approval ratings of Alan Garca as p resident of Peru during his second presidency (2006 2011). Source: Ipsos APOYO Opinin y Mercado S.A Peru 2006 2011 Figure 8 4. Peru Pr esidential approval ratings (1985 2011) Source: Ips os APOYO Opinin y Mercado S.A. Peru 1987 2011

PAGE 398

398 Figure 8 5. Peru (2006 2011) Source: Ipsos A POYO Opinin y Mercado S.A Peru 20 06 2011

PAGE 399

399 Table 8 8 Peru Economic performance variables: social sector (1981 2010) Year Poverty (% of pop.) GINI index Social expenditure* (% of government expenditure) Rural population (% of pop.) 1981 N/A N/A N/A 34.9 1982 N/A N/A N/A 34.4 198 3 N/A N/A N/A 34.2 1984 N/A N/A N/A 33.5 1985 N/A N/A N/A 33.1 1986 N/A 45.7 N/A 32.7 1987 N/A N/A N/A 32.3 1988 N/A N/A N/A 31.9 1989 N/A N/A N/A 31.5 1990 N/A 43.8 N/A 31.1 1991 N/A N/A N/A 30.8 1992 N/A N/A N/A 30.5 1993 N/A N/A N/A 30.2 1994 N/A 44.8 N/A 29.9 1995 N/A N/A N/A 29.7 1996 N/A 46.2 N/A 29.6 1997 N/A N/A N/A 29.5 1998 N/A N/A N/A 29.4 1999 47.5 N/A N/A 29.3 2000 48.4 N/A 35.7 29.3 2001 54.8 53.0 N/A 29.2 2002 54.3 54.6 36.6 29.1 2003 52.2 N/A 39.0 29.0 2004 48.6 N/A 37.0 28.9 2005 48.7 51.9 32.3 28.9 2006 44.5 49.5 36.7 28.8 2007 39.3 N/A 36.2 28.7 2008 36.2 N/A 32.0 28.6 2009 34.8 47.9 36.3 28.5 2010 31.3 N/A 31.7 28.4 This variable combines public expenditure in education and health. Source: World Development I ndicators of the World Bank Group.

PAGE 400

400 CHAPTER 9 SHIP STYLES historic al canvas, as a particular rendition of a disjunctive presidency in his first term and an articulative presidency in the second, was useful in terms of placing his leadership in political and secular time. Drawing from Chapter 8, particularly regarding Ga time, across political orders, across different relations with the establishment, this to his political stance in both of his administration s. 1 specific personality traits that involve the ways in which Garca responded to constraints, information and his motivations and drives, in this chapter we will see that itical advantages in the moment at hand, but they were also reflections of aspects of the man's character that permitted him to vindicate his place in history. About Alan Garca Alan Garca Perez was born in Lima to middle class parents in 1949. He grew up in a highly ideological APRA political family as his parents were political activists. For the first four years of his life he was raised by his mother only because his father was in jail as a result of his clandestine political activities. As a child and later in his youth Garca was part of APRA organizations in Lima where he was indoctrinated into the 1 raits assessment is based on twenty one interviews T hey include: public office holders elected and appointed, journalists specialized in the Peruvian Presidency, analysts and Peruvian scholars. Other sources are official speeches, public appearances, Gar reports.

PAGE 401

401 2 Early in his life Garca stood out for his exceptional lligence, 3 Victor Raul Haya de la Torre, the utmost APRA leader, selected him to be tutored as part of an elite group. He studied law first at the private Catholic University of Peru (PUCP Pontificia Universidad Catlica del Peru) but graduated from the San Marcos National University (UNMSM Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos) a public university. As a student he became a salient member of the APRA University Command (CUA Comando Universitario del APRA buffalo 4 For gradu ate school he went to first study law at the Universidad Complutense de Madrid and later sociology at Sorbonne University in Paris after being sponsored Torre. With his recommendations and contacts, young Garca was exposed to i nfluential intellectual and political figures from around the world and he obtained a doctorate in (Secretario Nacional de Organizacion), a post that allowed him to take effecti ve control of the party at the grassroots level. 5 He became a member of the Constituent Assembly (1978 1979) and remained close to Haya de la Torre until death. Alan Garca displaced contenders for the leadership of the party with the hel p of Armando Villanueva. H e relied heavily on the old radical populist school rather than the 2 Organizacin de Nios del APRA), and later he joined the APRA youth group (JAP Juventud Aprista Peruana). 3 Cavero, Elizabeth. "Retratos Del Poder: Alan Garca Prez. No Una, Sino Dos Veces." La Republica, March 12th 2006. 4 APRA Buffalo is a term commonly used to refer to APRA members who were part of clash groups and who defended the party interests at all cost, ofte n using violence. Interviews with Anonymous PER#7, PER#8 and PER#9. 5 The APRA national secretary of the organization is one of the three top leadership positions of the national executive committee of the party, and it is charge of coordination of the act ivities all regional committees engage in, its main function is to preserve and maintain the structure of the party to keep it up with the times, it is key since it keeps the official registration of party membership.

PAGE 402

402 retreating moderate stance (Graham, 1992). In 1980 Garca was elected national 1985) where he became nationally know n for his d aring interventions i secretary. During th at time he traveled throughout the country recruiting members wrapping APRA messages in sparkling rhetoric and displaying a charismatic personality. He be came the APRA presidential candidate and from early in the race he was described as a mover and shaker with modernizing ideas. 6 Garca is married to Pilar Nores an Argentinean national. He has six children; Carla from his first marriage. Josefina, Gabrie la, Luciana y Alan Ral with Nores, and Dante a son born out of wedlock. Leadership Style Constraints Garca was a leader who at first sight would rank high in the belief he can Leaders with these traits portray themselves as leaders in charge, overconfident that they know what needs to be done. An illustration of the strength of these traits in Garca can be appreciated in his own words on November 27, 1989 after more than two y ears of polls indicating that Vargas Llosa would be the likely next president of Peru for the 1990 elections, Alan Garca announced during a press conference that since no one was 7 reas serting his influence in the outcome of the election. The second example is a quote from January a President cannot make someone he wants to win [the 6 The Washington Post Dec 31, 1984 pg Pragmatic Leader Emerging in Peru Jackson Diehl 7 Press conference November 27th 1989. "Presidente Garca Anuncia Dura Batalla." El Peruano, Noviembre 27 1989

PAGE 403

403 presidency], but he can make someone he does not like lose s belief in his own influence in making the presidential elections of 2011 tip the way he wanted. 8 Garca was certainly a leader who generally challenge d directly or indirectly, the constraints of the environment, and pushe d the limits of what can be don However, he softened these traits during his second administration. After a failed first presidency he learned that it was not possible to control the environment. More over, he also learned that having less control also made him less accountable and he could shift or distribute the blame to his cabinet. his control and influence over events As described in Chapter 2, when lead ers have a view of the world believ ing they can control events, they tend to control policy making and implementation. What is particularly interesting is that there is a self fulfilling prophecy with these leaders, given that they are more likely to initiate policy making and make sure that policies are enacted and executed. Those who believe they can control the environment are less likely to delegate authority for tasks they consider important for the achievement of their goals. They are also less likely to compromise and deal with others and they convey strength and confidence in their decisions. In his first administration microman ager urge during his first presidency, such as calling businessmen personally 8 alan Garca dice quepuede evitar que sea presidente quien no quiere

PAGE 404

404 asking them about the magnitude and success of their investments. Moreover, they mentioned how Garca visited hospitals in the middle of the night to check personally how emergen extensive travels to inaugurate medical posts, schools, drainage systems, and other public works, \ that would show Peruvians they had a President who cared for them and who fulfilled his promises. (2009) description of a confident leader, someone who is convinced that, despite the difficulty, with will he can convert his ideas into reality. Neustadt (1960) desc ribed Franklin Delano Roosevelt as an overconfident leader who, as no other U.S. President in the t wenty c where it comes from; none has had more hunger for it 9 While this confidenc e occasionally allows leaders to accomplish what most people would not dare to do, it also means that it is difficult to predict whether or not their plans will be successful. d challenging authority were particularly positive in dealing with the military and police. During his first three years of government, in addition to restructur ing the military leadership and negotiat ing civil power over the military to decrease the milit ary budget, he also purged the police. At times boldness and defiance can have terrible consequences, and it is difficult for other s to make leaders change their minds or convinc e them of the fragility of their plans. For instance his lack of public servi ce and managerial experience added to his youthful impetus led to a toxic combination, as his 9 Neustadt (1960: 135 136)

PAGE 405

405 voluntarist approach to problems did not mean that there was governmental economic coherence and capacity to effectively manage public policies. f he could influence events was evident from the start of his first mandate, i.e., free rein. Major reforms followed quickly, but they created fiscal, monetary and currency imbala nces that eventually led to hyperinflation. Garca term measures. After the second year of his administration, this deficiency allowed the mounting problems to thorn th e government from many directions. The country became increasingly split about Garca At first his voluntarism was welcomed, but over time his intemperance, quick decision making and almost blind belief in his development program made things worse. His ha ughtiness did not help, as it was often reported that no one could tell him he was doing wrong. 10 Over the years, the sectarianism of Garca and his team led to his own marginalization Garca came to be the only center of decision making. His centralizatio n of power did not have a counterweight in his Cabinet or in Congress. The underlying logic was to put political considerations over economic matters. The bureaucracy beneath the economic team was not up to the task of the administration of the economy T h ere was no reservoir of institutional or personal skills, since the public administration was plagued with party members and sympathizers. As Greenstein (2003) reminds us, emotional intelligence is critical for a president in that his public actions canno t be distorted by uncontrolled passions. In times of crisis it is crucial to have a level head, a president with the ability to control emotions. Ga lack of impulse control as president was lethal for monetary policy, as witnessed by 10 Interview with Anonymous PER#2, and PER#4.

PAGE 406

406 some of the int erviewees, who assured that when they presented sound policies to stop hyperinflation, Garca changed the numbers in the formulas without considering the technicalities. H e did so out of his need to favor personal support over policy soundness. For some, Garca was a dreamer, with grandiose ideas. They described him as someone who has an ability to dream big dreams and who is a risk taker. To others, Garca was irresponsible and impulsive. Indeed, in his first government he was often seemed to have tempered with time, since no one described him in those terms in his second administration. Yet impulsiveness with animated outbursts and bad temperament may be part of his p ersonality, leading some people to refer to him as H e was thought to be manic depressive; 11 due to his apparent need for lithium to placate his mood. 12 In his second te rm, he was criticized for his visible and uncontrollable anxiety for food. Despite all the mechanisms of control he set up in his second administration there were still making impulses. Some think that he still believes voluntary actions can change destiny, with good will or a change of paradigm [of] social justice rather than investment. I am among those who believe it is cumulative ch ange that generates historical transformation 13 Garca attempted to speed up public policies by creating regulations that would make implementation more relaxed. An example of this occurred in 11 Interview with Anonymous PER#5, and PER#9 12 Jaime Bayly interview with Alan Garca. 2001 El Francotirador. 13 2010 Financial Times interview with Alan Garca.

PAGE 407

407 December, 2006 and January, 2007 when then E conomy Minister Ca rranza was out of the country and Garca pressed to loosen the restrictions on the National System of Public Investment (SNIP Sistema Nacional de Inversion Pblica). 14 Leaders whose need for power is high put signific ant effort into manipulating the environment. They are inclined toward strong and forceful actions in order to have control and influence and to appear successful and charismatic (House et al., 1991). Hermann main tains that these leaders are generally dar ing and charming, and they prefer face to face interaction. They generally like to test the limits before taking action. To see how far they can go, on the way they negotiate, pushing the rules they themselves set and changing them to secure their current interests or goals. They see people in terms of their usefulness to ends. It is almost impossible to separate Alan Garca the person from the politician, into a political family, grew up suffering persecution, and spent most of his active life in politics, he is the archetype of the political animal. Garca was someone who has lived olitics is all he has ever really done, and he has used his political savvy to be close to power. 15 There are dozens of anecdotes that illustrate the discipline and the personal sacrifices he chose to have, from Haya de la Torre, 16 to dealing with the ups and downs of poli tics; from skipping social 14 Interview with Anonymous PER#15. 15 Garca had little experience working outside of politics. After graduation from UNM SM he worked as a lawyer and won a few cases. I n 1971 Garca graduated as lawyer, and a year later he went to study law in Europe. A fter his return from Europe he taught law at the Federico Villarreal University briefly. 16 Garca deeply admired and respe cted Haya de la Torre throughout his life Garca said that as a child, knowing about the party and from the leader. Once he saw Haya de la Torr

PAGE 408

408 life during his university years, 17 to not prioritizing his family, 18 to spending nine years in exile. 19 What would seem as mere anecdotes are not really isolated stories. They reveal a drive for politics, a character whose life exp erience has been political inside and out, and whose personality lean s toward power. Garca has been widely depicted as someone whose quest and need for power is instinctive. With a life that was forged in the political fires, Garca had a drive as an inte nse dynamo; he was mover, shaker, and highest country office. 20 Once there, other goals development and modernization for Peru would follow. There are many reasons why people engage in politics O n one hand there is a narcissist element in which people consider t hemselves chosen to lead others. O n the other, there is a sense of duty, the need to serve. Friends, sympathizers and foes who knew Garca since his early days in politics think of him as a man whose major interest was not an unselfish devotion to his country, but an aim for political power. Similar to American President Lyndon Johnson, he was an energetic man who brought to the but to get to know him (...) when I was two meters away from [Haya de la Torre] this demi god, I felt like I was in the Sistine Chapel. He was stunning: a Basque old, white and bearded, with a hooked nose and a huge head that for me could only be synonymous with a solid intelligence ." It is no exaggeration to say that Haya de la Torre shaped la Torre in political meetings, Alan was deprived of any teen fun. Alan said that between the ages of 18 and 22 he had Switzerland, Peruvi say that the leaders stopped be ing leaders once they married (Quotes From: Cisneros, Renato "Elecciones 2006. Perfil Del Candidato Alan Garca." El Comercio, Ma rch 25th 2006. 17 According to Carlos Roca, a close friend of Garca and a party comrade, the selected youngsters that Haya de la Torre mentored personally were required to attend party meetings every day including weekends and nights and to carry out par tisan obligations. Cavero, Elizabeth. "Retratos Del Poder: Alan Garca Prez. No Una, Sino Dos Veces." La Republica, March 12th 2006. 18 Elizabeth. Retratos Del Poder: Alan Garca Prez. No Una, Sino Dos Veces." La Republica, March 12th 2006. 19 coming back to Peru even knowing that Fujimori co Interview with Anonymous PER#4. 20 Interview with Anonymous PER#7, PER#8 and PER 11.

PAGE 409

409 Presidency a genuine love of politics, of the bickering and conniving and the sense of public interest (Walker and Shafer, 2000). Some critics believed he did not interiorize the concept of public service or civic action as conviction, but that he sought power simply because he liked power. 21 There is a consensus that Garca was not an accidental politician. Rather, he prepared himself to become a politician, 22 which in his mind meant that a successful politician reaches the highest office in his country, the pres idency. Those who know him well at the personal level, say that he had a vocation for politics. H e was often described as a professional politician with a great advantage politics came naturally to him; he was made for politics. For his friends and for people who developed a cl ose working relationship with him, Garca the politician was very different from Garca the person. 23 As a person, they described Garca as very unpretentious and even considerate, funny and witty, charming and delightful to be with. But i n public he had tw o attitudes, one as candidate or politician, and the other as president. The President was more dis tant, more serious, and solemn. H e maintained an emotional distance which seemed rooted in self sufficiency and that often transmitted grandeur, even despoti sm. The politician or candidate was more approachable; he seemed to listen and pay careful attention before he spoke. Friends and foes agree that Garca was a mesmerizing speaker, with a powerful oratory. He had a swaggering gait and charisma with a great capacity for 21 Interview with Anonymous PER#3, PER#6, PER#11, PER#14. 22 When Garca returned to Peru, after the Morales contacts, young Garca was exposed to influential intellectual and political figures. In 1974 Garca went to France to study at Paris Sorbonne University, he also established relationships at high level politics with members of the Socialist International. In Europe Garca developed his intellect further and sharpened his political skills. After his return, the old Haya de la Torre became proudly impressed with Garca, who quickly became part of the new generation of APRA leaders. 23 Interview with Anonymous PER#4, PER# 8, PER#10 and PER#15.

PAGE 410

410 persuasion. By capturing the atmosphere in public events, Garca seemed to devote his energy to social ly productive endeavors, being talkative and seeming to understand and say what people needed to hear. 24 This is not to say that he empathize d sincerely ; it had a political skill and he knew how to use it. Information Hermann (2003) contends that, when self confidence is high and conceptual complexity low, leaders tend to be closed to information. They feel they know what is right and what sho uld happen, and they seek to persuade others o f the correctness of their decisions. They believe their interpretation of reality is the appropriate one. Usually their decision making processes are organized in a vertical manner to maintain control over the nature of the decision. While Garca seemed to be less open to information in his first administration, in the second he became more strategic and focused his attention on what was doable. In his first presidency, he moved quickly and too far for the pol itical temper of Peru, as a result, he ended his term with extremely low ratings. His first year in office was an exercise of political excess, but with high popularity ratings and positive economic results he felt confident. In the last two years, the sit u ation was the complete opposite. H owever he did not change his views and insisted on applying policies that he thought c ould save his political program, the heterodox economic policies which he manipulated to make them seem populist. After his return to Peru in 2001, he spent four years stumping the country, assuring others that he had changed his ways and promising that 24 In an October 2005 a public opinion poll ask ing : 1) He is a good communicator and knows how to get to people ; 2) he is a leader; 3) he is smart and capable ; 4) he is likable and charismatic ; 5) he is democratic ; 6) has a vision ; 7) is brave ; 8) is efficient ; 9) is a hard worker ; 10) loves his country ; 11) is socially sensitive ; 12) is calm and reflexive. Among the least mentioned qual ities were honesty, truthfulness, sincerity, and responsi bility

PAGE 411

411 he was in tune with globalization. He returned to office in 2006, and from then on his political comportment was by all accounts more me asured and responsive to political reality. 42 % approval rating when he left office after his second term compared to 14 % at the end of his first. In his first admini stration Garca fought the restrictive economic international environment reflected in the external shocks that hit Peru. His response to the economic crisis of the 1980 s was a voluntaristic approach to the immediate problems. He held grimly to the convic tion that the course he had chosen was one of honor and national interest, and that the ordeal simply had to be borne. In his second administration, he adjusted his beliefs and understood that structural economic considerations were as important as politi cal considerations, but still he failed to acknowledge the relevance of social considerations. When elected in 2006, his administration adopted market discipline and deepened neoliberal reforms in several critical areas, keeping the economy growing under o rthodox economic management. But Garca failed to implement substantive social policies that should have intended t o provide poor families a safet net was limited because it lac ked the received. Moreover, primary and secondary education and public health services did not improve substantially A s shown in Table 8 7 social expenditure during the Garca administration was lower than during with average 3 4.05 % and 36.32 % respectively

PAGE 412

412 omplexity The contextually complex leader who ranks high, explores and sees a variety of reasons for a particular posit ion, and finds the environment ambiguous responding to a wider array of stimuli in the environment compared to someone who tends to use shortcuts and stereotypes. Within the contextual complexity continuum, Garca leaned toward low contextual complexity i n contrast to other leaders. H e tended to see things in black and white more than in shades of gray. T his allowed him to make decisions quickly, which can be useful particularly in times of crisis However relying on his intuition and preferring action ra ther than planning or to gathering information was counterproductive, particularly in his first presidency. Garca was regarded as an extremely intelligent person by friends and foes, and he seemed to be very aware of his intelligence. For the behavior di splayed during his first presidency he ranks low in contextual complexity but higher in the second. In general, Garca was a public figure at the top of the game H e was a politician who knew who he was and how to sell himself. He was perceived as a man o f steadfast resolve, who was politically intelligent, and shrewd, and one who knew how to manage the public agenda. Some saw him as an artful manipulator, as someone who could misinform and li e with a straight face, a trust unworthy politician who would go into ideological falsehood and opportunism and create s a lot of resistance. Despite the noteworthy personal characteristics and skills, the political animal in him seemed to prevent him from having a long term vision, particularly in his first adminsitra tion. 25 His sense of politics was in the short term W hen describing him during his first term some 25 Garca supported Fujimori against all other candidates including the candidate of his own party, in the 1990 elections. Particularly in the run off, Garca contributed with the use of the state apparatus to prevent Vargas Llosa from winning.

PAGE 413

413 interviewees referred to Garca as an opportunist and a pragmatist, but not as a statesman. Some people thought he was a pedestrian politician, a clever one a witty nature. The immediate events and the day to day politics seemed to hold most of his attention, particularly when he was in office. His self perception as an intelligent leader was particularly damaging in his first term when it made him a lonely thinker and the ultimate decision maker who was not used to teamwork. However, in his secon d he showed noticeable at tempts to reach out by seeking advice, seriously considering othe viewpoints and brainstorming with others. Leaders c onfidence Garca remained low to moderate in self confident during his two presidencies. Even though a c onfident president is desirable, the over confident leader ranks low becase he does not search for more information on which to evaluate his decisions and worth. Accord ing to friends, colleagues and foes, as well as those who had followed him closely, Garca saw his role in political history as someone whose duty was to make the great changes in Peru. According to one account who has a pro the bad experience of his first government, he not only wanted to make up in his second

PAGE 414

414 26 Garca a imed to finish his second term in good standing, not only for vindication but also because he was already thinking of a successful reelection in 2016. 27 Moreover as Garca has said on 28 G s personal goals are more aligned with his self perception of being a chosen one president he once said, "being 35 years old and bringing the victory to the party af ter 55 years out ofgovernment was like crossing the Red Sea. I felt it was my destiny 29 Indeed, for many Garca comes across as arrogant, proud and haughty. 30 He has been described as extremely self 31 For most, Garca was extr emely ambitious to reach th e top, and he did not necessarily choose the scrupulous road. Those who knew him well personally said that Garca thought he had a personal and he would use what he could in order to achieve it. This does not mean that he sought personal benefits from the alleged corruption in his party, especially after his first government. 32 His ethics and morals were secular and formal. From early in his life Garca expressed his desire to become president of Peru. Most agree that Garca 26 Interview with Anonymous PER #8. 27 See Financial Times 2010 interview with Alan Garca. 28 Interview with Anonymous PER #4.. 29 Cisneros, Renato "Elecciones 2006. Perfil Del Candidato Alan Garca." El Comercio, March 25th 2006. 30 Interview with Anonymous PER#1, PER#6, PER#13, PER#14, and PER#17. 31 cable disclosed by Wikileaks. See /20101216elpepuint_17 /Tes 32 Five major corruption charges h a unted Garca during the interpresidency period: of illicit enrichment causing detriment to the Peruvian state, possible overseas bank accounts, intervention regarding reserves of the Reserve Central Bank (Banc o Centr al de Reserva BCR), irregular purchase of mirage planes. Mirage Planes case, see Caretas (1180), and, and the Electric Train. Electric Train case see Caretas (1180) atti/zanatti.htm and Caretas (1361, 1645)

PAGE 415

415 enjoys the exercise of power, as part of his narcissistic personality as well as his personal belief that he has been handed a mission and has a call, almost a mystical call, to be president. He did not seem to be afraid of power and, even aft er a traumatic first presidency, Garca was not traumatized by responsibilities. Some of the interviewees think that Garca genuinely feels he is the best person to be the president of Per u. Even Mario presidency, refers to Garca as a self assured and likable pe impression when he first met Garca was of someone smart but tremendously ambitious and willing to do anything to get to power (Vargas Llosa, 1993). Motivation In his second presidency Garca approached problems differently than in h is first and he was more careful about testing what was possible than in imposing his threats and problems display ing highly assertive and aggressive behavior. L f ocus on p roblem s olving vs. f ocus on r elationships Regarding task focus, Alan Garca demonstrated a preoccupation with relationships over particular problems. In his first presidency, the feelings and needs of relevant constituencies took precede nce over dealing with the problems faced by the government. This preoccupation was more notorious in the first presidency, as he sought to establish relationships with those who did not vote for him, to keep the loyalty of his constituents, and to keep hig h morale and the spirit in his political party. Garca seems to fit what Post (2003) calls a narcissistic personality, one in which the leader makes a sustained effort to seem selfless to his countrymen, while he actually seeks to gain recognition, fame a nd glory. The self absorbed leader has intense

PAGE 416

416 ambitions, and in his interpersonal relationships there is a quality of personnel exploitation by surrounding himself with admirers, as Garca did in his first term, and dropping them when they are no longer n eeded. This is evident from his teacher like and condescending attitude, as well as his self perception as indispensable. 33 The implications in decision making of this type of personality can be severe, as made him assemble a cabinet to obey Garca and not to question his decisions, and he relied on a team of advisers who held views similar to his own 34 When making decisions it was always Garca deciding, usually alone, b ehind closed doors. Although Garca enjoyed intellectual discussions, there were very few people he considered intellectually worthy of his conversations. 35 The way to captivate Garca was through creative thinking that c ould challenge him, and to contribu te to setting challenging policy objectives. 36 Some people who worked closely with Garca, particularly in his second administration, said he often had a teacher like attitude, a need to explain to others almost as if he wanted to convince them. In his s econd term, Garca attempted to become more open to others ideas and to be convinced. He seemed to be more passive and had learned to control his temper and his impulsive behavior. At least he played the part of a president in control. In his 33 guests and technocrats who witnessed ca binet meetings the behavior they saw was a president mistreating his own people with no apparent objective, and it seemed that Garca rejoiced by bullying his own people and fe lt superior by putting them on the spot. The cabinet meeting atmosphere was des cribed as similar to a royal court; Garca showed little respect for social norms, and he did not see his teammates as equals or even as worth y of his respect. 34 The small group of advisers surrounding Garca during the first three years was led by Daniel Carbonetto, an Argentinean engineer who led the economic plan designed according to a model developed in the leftist phase by circle was formed mainl y of an APRA group that worked on the electoral program (CONAPLAN) and that had ministerial posts: Gonzales Posada, Enrique Cornejo, and image specialist, Hugo Otero. 35 Interview with Anonymous PER#5. 36 Interview with Anonymous PER# 10 and PER#15.

PAGE 417

417 second term he created mechanisms with venues of control where he tested his ideas first, much like a very private consulting system. Each of these outlets had its own format and included a variety of people with different professions that ultimately he trusted. One g roup was formed by his closest personal friends, about five of them includ ing businessmen, long time friends, and citizens who were not necessarily involved in politics. Another group was a younger generation of APRA members known ere was also group of technocrats that he respected and listened to, 37 including his two time economy minister, Luis Carranza, who is regarded credentials, and they were al so creative thinkers, who challenged Garca and contributed to make his dreams even bigger. His style for negotiation leaned more on the attempt to c onvince side than on the giving in side. He has been described as the negotiator with the advantage and h e let the other part y know. Therefore, when agreements were reached, it seemed like he Some of the interviewees thought Garca had an authoritarian personality, while others beli eved that he had a domineering style without seeming despotic. Most agree that, in general, that Garca has remain ed bossy and often manipulative. However, even though Garca had the personal characteristics of an authoritarian, for the most part he has re mained respectful of democratic forms, if not for conviction, at least for practical reasons. Whether he was a convict ed democrat remains questionable, but he respected the principles of democracy in his behavior. In contrast with other Peruvian presidents 37 This g roup of technocrats included three time minister Mercedes Araoz, former minister Veronica Zavala and prime minister (and former minister of education) Jose Antonio Chan.

PAGE 418

418 namely Belaunde and Fujimori, Garca did not participate in coups of any sort. Nor did he utilize authoritarian mechanisms to curb the press. It also did not appear at any point that Garca himself sought to change the constitution to allow his own reele ction. Part of this may be attributed to respect to democratic principles, but Garca was also a realist who understood the political cost and tedium of such an endeavor. Although there were attempts to change the constitution in 1987, when the non APRA de puty Hector Marisca released the idea of constitutional change allowing reelection, it seems that Marisca did so to ingratiate himself with the President. Clearly, though, if Garca had wanted to change the constitution, he could have done so At the time his popularity was still high circumstances were in his favor, and there was no organized opposition to stop him in congress. The 1987 event involving Marisca and the rumors in 1989 of an attempt to extend his first term to 1992 w ere not substantive T her e were discussions in the media, but there was no sustained effort from APRA or from Garca himself to strive for an extension of unconstitutional power. Garca understood that APRA needed to play by the rules and accept the results of the democratic game, important to maintain a working democratic system in order to be able to come back, as 38 Degree of in g roup b ias Hermann discussed in group bias as a onstrate a high concern to protect his own kind A leader with high in group bias has a strong emotional attachment to his group. The extent of his in group bias provides evidence concerning the leader s motivations, particularly whether the leader is driv en by perceived threats or problems, or by perceived opportunities to form cooperative relationships (Hermann, 38 Interview with Anonymous PER#4.

PAGE 419

419 1991, 1998, 2001, 2003). Garca ranked high in the in group bias trait in both presidencies in his first presidency however this bias was more n oticeable. He displayed his concern when other groups or organizations tried to meddle in what he perceived as internal affairs. This is illustrated by the strong reaction he had toward the IMF at the peak of the debt crisis during his first administration Garca became an overnight international phenomenon when he spoke at the United Nations and at forums of the non aligned countries, where showed a n excess of zeal when it came to defending Peru, accusing multilateral organizations of keeping their own selfish interests above those of the countries they were supposed to help Another illustrat ion that highlights his effort to keep others out occurred in 1986 at a summit of nonaligned countries in Zimbabwe where the Cuban president Fidel Castro advised Garca on how to make a presentation and what to say. Garca replied to Castro ommendations, as what? I do not like b eing held by the 39 Hermann (1998, 20 01, 2003) contends that leaders whose personality reveals high in group bias are prone to perceive only the good aspects of their own group and to see others groups as threats. Moreover, they can become aware relatively late of problems that undermine thei r authority when they are too protective of their kind. Another group bias is the cabinet dynamic and loyalty he expected 39 Cavero, Elizabeth. "Retratos Del Poder: Alan Garc a Prez. No Una, Sino Dos Veces." La Republica, March 12th 2006.

PAGE 420

420 from his members, especially during Garca I. Furthermore, while he sought to portray an outside imag e of one cohesive cabinet, he was protective of advisers and partisan ministers in his cabinet, but only to the extent that they showed loyalty. In his first presidency, Garca selected people who he perceived as loyal and who identified with his immediate group, choosing advisers on the basis of their partisanship and sense of community; 33 out of 55 of his cabinet members were mostly APRA colleagues. 40 Garca himself, the advisers, and his party were soaked in ideology, and their reading of reality was thr ough ideological lenses. Garca used his personal popularity to provide autonomy to his team. The contrast between cabinet management and decision making in his first and second terms is stark. For his second term he put together a politically independent technocratic group of cabinet members W hile he did not protect them zealously, he did protect the image he thought the cabinet should have. Most of his ministers during Garca II had long careers that dealt with the public and private sector and had a pro ven track record. In his second administration only 22 out of 64 cabinet posts were party colleagues. 41 Even though Garca had more respect for his cabinet during Garca II, he among policy makers were cabinet meetings. During these meetings, ministers and other participants exchanged ideas and opinions freely, yet the way in which they addressed disagreement could not highlight the President could alert him of t he dangers of taking certain positions. It was at the private level, at one on one encounters when Garca showed he could be persuaded to change his ideas, but not when there 40 Cabinet composition and membership can be found in the Appendix. 41 Cabinet composition and membership can be found in the Appendix.

PAGE 421

421 were others present. At the private level, he seemed open to learn more H e was c urious, asked questions and revised the logic and consistency of his and the others ideas on the table. 42 In his second term he was more willing to analyze government and policy errors. At cabinet meetings he made his government errors and mistakes a shar ed responsibility. In this regard he was very formal and spoke in the plural, describing the scenarios but not assigning specific responsibility to individuals. He has often been depicted as a condescending boss, as someone overbearing and denigrating. But he disciplined himself to listen, maintaining a paternalistic style that often generated fear, respect and also admiration. 43 Early in his second term, he reprimanded his ministers severely for disagreeing with him in public (after a public disagreement over the death penalty for rapists). He instructed his ministers to keep a unified government public image, and he was not willing to tolerate behaviors that would diminish his leadership stature. He maintained the tendency, as he did in his first term, to oversee everything and he made the important decisions. Garca recognized in private that he tended to micromanage, yet he thought that 44 To a certain extent the same groups where he tested his ideas were the groups that he trusted to keep him in sync with the happenings. These were the people that became his radar, because he was in office and while there he could not relate to the common citizen. 42 Interview with Anonymo u s PER#10. 43 Interview with Ano nymous PER#15. 44 Interview with Jaime Bayly in El Francotirador.

PAGE 422

422 Despite G encountered more difficulties in the implementation of his leadership project than he did in Garca I. As a comeback president Garca did not c ome t, as he did in his first term, wi th a strong mandate or with high popularity ratings. His still gripping oratory did not had passed since he left office. T he times were different, and so was the response of the citizenry to politicians. There was a noticeable change in him, wh ich apparently developed slowly; he was more open to ideas that were different from his, and he was at ease in breaking the molds he had created and moving out of his comfort zone. This change caused him problems as his discour se, campaign promises and aims we re different from what he actually d id in government. While his ambiguous stance was good for the campaign, it also made him less trustworthy. Trust vs. distrust world and its problems largely determines the confrontational attitude of the country and the likelihood of taking initiative. When this trait is high the leader perceive s the actions of others to be detrimental to his project (Hermann, 2003). Garca disp layed high distrust with others in first presidency and more moderate in the second H ence he preferred to do things on his own. Moreover, his inherent distrust for others prevented him from envisioning a successor, as well as from benefiting from the idea s of others whom he perceived as challenges to his authority. Both as president and as party leader, he did not have a program to promote new helping those he considered va luable. But he liked to be in control of the situation in which his protgs were developing, and as long as they did not become a threat he did

PAGE 423

423 not intrude. He seemed to care genuinely for those in the cabinet whom he considered his closest team members H e taught and advised on issues as diverse as public image to personal ways to deal with public responsibilities. In Garca II his most successful cabinet members developed a different relationship with him compared to those in Garca I. Despite not being when they showed audacity and innovation. They were able to arouse his enthusiasm by proposing daring objectives that he would support in full force. Discus sion Like Snchez de Lozada, Alan Garca was a comeback president with two leadership styles, one in each of his presidencies. However, in contrast to Snchez de Lozada, Garca demonstrated positive political learning because he was open to new information. He would fit evangelistic As shown in Table 9 1, during environmental constraints that he encountered and remained closed in his ideas. His focus on relationships took precedence over his attentio n to problems. He focused on persuading others to accept his message and sought to have them join his cause. Driven by self confidence, at first Garca exploited his good relationship with his constituency, making himself the star p erformer in the national drama, and not be ing strongly affiliated with the establishment. In his first administration Garca displayed a behavior that made him a challenger of the constraints of his environment H owever in his second administration he became a respecter, not for conviction but because he understood that it was what people expected from him. H is openness to receive information was limited during his first administration, but in the second he became more open. Regarding motivations,

PAGE 424

424 st administration were mainly oriented to relationships, while in the second they were oriented to problems. Thus Garca is a president with an evangelistic style in his first administration and opportunistic style of leadership in the second. Garca was a case of democratic learning his perceptions of what Peru needed T he way he reacted to circumstances and his drives were of paramount importance, as in his first presidency he speeded up the end of a political order I n the second p residency, instead of obstructing the political process in place he contributed to the maintenance of the political order, albeit at a high cost. During his first term Garca tried to rally the economica l l y powerful interests to join him in his mission to save Peru and to mak e it an example for others and f or a short period it seemed that he was succeed ing. However, when he realized that powerful economic interests took advantage of the loopholes of his economic plan, he reacted fiercely and alienated the elites. He also alie nated his supporters, as Peruvians experienced one of the highest hyperinflations in the world, eventually worsening the economy failed, not only as a result of bad economic policy, but mainly because Garca was so fixed in his own ideas. He was convinced that his voluntaristic approach to problems was sufficient and he failed to have a reading of reality, which required that he change his ideological mind and become open to new ways to approach problems. After his attempt to nationalize the banking industry and his popularity plummeted, his presidency became focused on the negative relationship with the newly formed opposition. Garca focused his efforts on blocking the success of his political rivals,

PAGE 425

425 especially of his archenemy, the leader of the united political right, Vargas Llosa and opportunistic e; he focused on assessing what was possible as the situation presented and as the context permitted. After his disastrous first administration, Garca had learned that it was impossible to control the environment effectively. He also learned that if he wa nted to succeed he needed to ride the wave started by others, in order to vindicate a positive different leadership style in his second administration. This contribute democracy, as his behavior favored dialogue over confrontation, compromise over a zero sum battleground of ideas vs. ideologies, moderation over extremism. His approach on the economy is perhaps the most salient example of this a clear shift f rom his first famously disastrous foray into the issue. Garca learned that willingness to produce changes in society was not sufficient and that soundness, continuation and consistency are at the core of governance. at he became the only Peruvian president who against all odds exercised the presidency twice non consecutively since the return to democratic politics. His two terms were separated by sixteen years, during which three other presidents ruled the country. Gi ven the poorly institutionalized system that Garca encountered upon his return, he could have chosen to build on the legacy of his predecessors or begin anew. Garca chose to build on the existing policies, demonstrating that political learning is possibl e when political time, secular time and the

PAGE 426

426 by staying within the limits of the neoliberal model are indicators of the weakness of his leadership the second time in office. A big difference between the two presidencies is that, while in his first presidency there was rhetoric over what fostered common good, but in his second presidency this moral argument was entirely absent from the discourse. The continuation of neoliberal policies and th e embracement of global competition were taken as a given. Garca expected that the market efficiency arguments provided by the neoliberal order would be embraced by all whether or not people benefited from the development model. The historical context pr ovided the perfect opportunity to make a moral argument over the benefits of liberalism. He needed to be explicit about the reasons behind his enforcement of the neoliberal order and his leadership project, particularly since he was able to return to the p recidency as a default choice when compared to the moral arguments Ollanta Humala made during the election campaign. Garca wrongly interpreted that his return as President holding the neoliberal flag was a carte blanche for the continuation of the develo wake up call to the viability of the model. behavior in his second presidency signaled greater resp ect for democratic politics than Peru did not have a clear road to follow. He did not contribute to develop credible new leadership inside his party. His faint attempt to support a n independent candidate to run under his in the 2006 general elections, in 2011 the first round of the vote did not result in a clear

PAGE 427

427 mandate for the next president. To the surprise of many, Humala, once considered radical candidate, won the elections over the conservative candidate Keiko Fujimori. Indeed, by then Humala had softened his anti neoliberal rhetoric, but he still affirmed that the neoliberal framework impo sed by Fujimori should be abandoned. Uncertainty was such that skeptical investors panicked and the Lima stock market capitalization dropped dramatically following the first round of balloting. 45 c environment. Despite the financial crisis of 2008, Peru continued to have an economy in good standing, and the unprecedented bonanza widened the scope of discretion for Garca. He could have opted for a spending spree and to increase his popularity towar d the end of his mandate (as it is common with other leaders about to step down), however he did and to adopt softer tones and middle ground solutions. His behavior se t an example for other politicians. The benefits of containing oneself and recognizing that the constraints of the environment contribute to moderation, far outweighs the tendency for grandiose ideas and outbursts. The fact that Garca became more predicta ble in his behavior, let the door open for his return in a very likely 2016 presidential run. 45

PAGE 428

428 Table 9 Characteristic First presidency: Evangelistic Second presidency: Opportunistic Challenger/r especter Challenger Respecter Belief can control events High Moderate Need for power High High Openness information Close Open Contextual complexity Low High Self confidence Low Moderate Motivation: Problem/relationship Relationship Problem Task vs. interpersonal focus Relationship Problem In group bias High Moderate Distrust of others High Moderate

PAGE 429

429 CHAPTER 10 CONCLUSION S In the absence of strong institutions in Latin America, and with politics developing in a context of democratization, this research examined the role of presidents in the process of democratization. While recent scholarship in the region has been prolific with regards to the enactment and implementation of policy under certain presidents, this dissertation has focused on the role of presidents acting within a democratic regime struggling to exercise their authority. Therefore, it is not an analysis of policies per se but an analysis of the way presidents act to legitimate their actions. In this regard, this dissertation adopted a Skowronekean approach; it was not about the policies that presidents make but about the politics that presidents make. Because the dissertation centered on the impact of individuals in politics, the issues of experience in office and re election, which are often claimed as necessary for leadership effectiveness, were analyzed. By designing a study that involved what seemed dissimilar cases, at different times, this research looked at three presidents who held office twice non consecutively, operat ing in three different countries. In turn, the selected case studies offered three advantages: 1) by placing the presidencies in a larger historical context it was possible to trace the evolution of a political order in a country and its impact o n democrat ization; 2) by identifying the place in time in which their presidencies occurred it was possible to observe structural opportunities and the constrain t s presidents experience while they are in office leadership styles based on personality traits at two different times, it was possible to

PAGE 430

430 The explanation of political dynamics in new democracies, the process of democratization, through an account of three presidents acting in three countr ies, cannot be undertaken in term s of a straightforward structure or an agency explanation. This study demonstrates the advantages of an approach that combines the two. Asserting that presidential leadership depends upon political conditions, historical fo rces, and leaders own vision s is a complex matter. When an d how they affect d emocratization is a multidimensional issue I t involves different levels of interaction between micro and macrosocial phenomena, from leadership projects being in tune with social forces, to decisions that vary in nature and whose impacts are hard to gra sp The three case studies suggest that most leadership challenges are shared by all presidents. Experience in office does not guarantee a s capacity to enhance democracy. P roblems with implementing policy are ubiquitous; most leaders have articulative presidencies as they are reluctant to oppose powerful organized interests and to reject the guiding ideas, institutions and existing tools of the political order. Party, opposi tion and social conflict is all too common. By evaluating whether or not experienced presidents have better second presidencies than firsts, I suggested that presidents returning to office after an inter presidency period do not necessarily have a better s econd term than their first. As time goes by, polities change, and experienced presidents do not always respond adequately to new developments. They do not act in the best interest s of the people. Unless they adapt their leadership styles and keep in tune with the demands of the current conditions, there is no guarantee that experience leads to an effective presidency that can contribute positively to deepen ing democratization. Moreover, the sources for political learning are all different and can

PAGE 431

431 happen at different times. For instance, for Snchez de Lozada one instance of democratic learning happened after he lost his first presidential election O ne similar instance for Garca happened after he lost the election on his second attempt to reach the preside ncy. Fernndez did not lose an election but his chosen successor did. These findings are similar to s tudies that look at re election and suggest that second term presidencies tend to be less enriching than first term experiences (Amorim Neto, 2006; Baliev, that few presidents are able to maintain control over the political changes they have set in motion and that presidents alter the political landscape whether or not they succeed in keeping control. The findings described below, derived from data gathered through interviews, archival research and survey data, support hypothesis. I analyzed context and leadership styles, first, situating presidencies across time and plac e, and second, characterizing leadership between individuals, using two frameworks. First, following Skowronek (1993), I considered presidencies within extended political cycles. Each presidency was placed in either a rise or fall of a political order, and each president was assessed according to his affiliation or opposition to the prevailing structure of authority. These dynamics, which involved four different scenarios of successive incumbents coming to power in new situations, helped me to indentify sim ilar conditions. In this regard, I have demonstrated that what may seem as dissimilar : different presidents, acting in different countries at different times are in fact comparable. In each country chapter there is a description of the different ways in which each president sought to reconcile the inherent problem s that his actions created: t hat is, the preservative

PAGE 432

432 purposes, the transformative purposes and the affirming purposes. While all of them struggled to reconcile these impulses, they did so within differently configured situations. I have also used tools offered by political psychology, specifically trait analysis as situations that required their decisions. While I cannot claim to predict the actions s leadership style helps to understand the type of reactions he is likely to have given certain events Some presidential actions influence unidirectionally, strongly, an d directly. Some are consistent over time. Most are subtle or indirect and are contingent in strength and direction upon the presence of other factors. Results As shown in Table 10 1 Alan Garca I and Gonzalo Snchez de Lozada II had more in common with e ach other than with their respective other presidencies or with their immed iate predecessors or successors. Both le d disjunctive presidencies : Garca I in the context of the popular nationalistic order, and Snchez de Lozada II in the context of the neoli first term Leonel Fernndez both terms and the second term of Garca also have commonalities as all wer e articulative presidencies in the context of the neoliberal order. Disjunctive Presidencies Indeed the two disjuncti ve presidencies in this dissertation, Garca I and Snchez de Lozada II, share the fact that they were presidents in the most unfortunate contexts, they were affiliated with vulnerable political orders Garca with the popular nationalistic and Snchez de Lozada with the neoliberal order.

PAGE 433

433 As in the presidencies of John Quincy Adams, Franklin Pierce, Herbert Hoover and Jimmy Carter in the US, Garca I and Snchez de Lozada II were presidents whose actions seemed inconsequential to solve the problems of the day. The instinctive stance of these presidents to remain affiliated with the establishment became a threat for the vitality of their nation s and their leadership collapsed as they lost credibility. These two presidents and Hern n Sile s (1982 1985) are the only dis junctive presidents found in the three countries of study. While Garca was initially handed reconstructive opportunities, he failed to exploit these reconstructive possibilities, because he insisted on continuing politics o f the past. Lozad a did not have this possibility. T he results of the 2002 elections revealed from the start that his political capital was scarce. Articulative Presidenc ies According to Skowronek, the majority of the U S presidencies have been articulative with James Monroe, James Polk, Theodore Roosevelt, and Lyndon Johnson as examples of this type. The characterization in this dissertation seems to confirm this tenden cy. Four out of the six presidencies studied in depth, as well as most of the other presidencies in Bolivia, Dominican Republic and Peru since the return to democratic politics, were found to be articulative pres innovative orthodoxy. As Skowronek (1993) reminds us, innovation, albeit orthodox, is intrinsically destabilizing. The merely constructive leadership project is a chimera because the affiliated leader cannot deem independent ground without eventually taking on the ro le of the heretic. The only way to be a president in own right is to become a great repudiator and go against the buttress of received power In this context,

PAGE 434

434 political disruption be comes equivalent to presidential significance, which in turn is res erved for reconstructive leaders. The presidencies of Snchez de Lozada I, Leonel Fernndez I and II, and Alan Garca II suggest that new achievements depend on established foundations, as well as on the personal work of the presidents, who need to assert their own legitimac ies continuously Reconstructive Presidencies Seldom do historical conditions present themselves so that the opportunity to reconstruct the politics of a country is possible. While virtually all presidents seek to differentiate from the previous administration, and all of them seek to affirm their authority and to transform politics; they do so in different ways. However, most of them contribute only marginally. Only a handful of presidents were effective in changing politics altogether and these we re the reconstructive presidents. These are the ones because they persuade and shake politics those whose goals of leadership lead to fundamental and comprehensive change in political structures, society, and values. According to Skowronek (1993), in the U.S. these presidents were: Thomas Jefferson, Andrew Jackson, Abraham Lincoln, and Franklin D. Roosevelt. In the co untries and period analyzed in this dissertation those presidents were Victor Paz (1985 1989) in Bolivia, and Alberto Fujimori (1990 2001) in Peru. None of these presidents w as studied in depth in this study. Personality T raits As Winter reminds us (2003) the effects of leaders personalities will always depend on the situation s in which they find themselves. Personality trait analysis itself cannot predict exact situations, but it can tell about the types of reaction certain leaders

PAGE 435

435 tend to have at certa play a role particularly under extreme conditions. This dissertation has demonstrated that the identity of the presidents is important because the types of considerations required for dec ision making depend on a whether he nourishes from the information on the environment or selectively pick s information that suits his views. In this regard, this disse rtation speaks to the issue of reelection. As the case of Leonel Fernndez in his second administration shows, when immediate re election is the goal the and the president campaigns his decision making changes because t he electoral calculus demands that he stop, postpone or make certain decisions that he would not normally make. Moreover, when immediate re election is not possible, but there is a possibility to return to power in future times, a president do es ucceed, as demonstrated in the cases of Snchez de Lozada and Garca after their first term s ; and Fernndez after his second. The quality of presidential decisions does not, however, increase with fewer elections; on the contrary it requires more and bette r democracy. As shown in Table 10.2 both Snchez de Lozada II and Garca I were crusaders, in the sense that they challenged the constraints of the environment while remaining basically closed to receive information. They stuck to their beliefs that the y could control events. This combination of traits proved toxic for their disjunctive presidencies. Not only were they unable and unwilling to compromise, but they insisted on imposing their own views. By doing so they failed to perceive that the conditio ns of their presidencies were not incidental. They also failed to perceive that the conditions

PAGE 436

436 were not prone to their management, but that the conditions had changed and required flexib le leaders willing to negotiat e and compromise. Both Fernndez I and II, and Garca I, took advantage of the opportunities presented to them. Not only were they accommodative, but they also let the environment inform them T hey were able to engage in consensus building and in finding compromise. These leaders realized that there was little room for them to make structural changes, because the constraints in which they f ound themselves were strong, and their goals were modest as a result The im plications for democracy of the leadership style of Fern ndez and Garc a are at best mixed. While they each provided predictability to the process their countries democracy as he maintained the status quo politics corrupt and clientelistic. He replaced and extended the clientelistic network held by the PRSC and transferred it to his own party. While Fernndez teamed and reached consensus with other powerful players, this consensus maintained political control in the hands of dominant players and did not benefit the population at large. The Dominican political pla yers. Since it had found ways to cope with political frustrations through clientelism and immigration, there was no positive change t o allow more inclusion, contestation and social progress for the masses. While civil rights for Dominican nationals have re mained largely respected, the same cannot be said for thousands of citizens of Haitian origin or ancestors who cannot exercise political rights and wh o remain powerless.

PAGE 437

437 Leadership Styles Leadership style is thought to be one the most permanent character istics of a leader, given its stable association with constraints, motivations and perceptions of reality (Hermann, 2003). As shown in Table 10 3, two of the three presidents analyzed in this dissertation present fairly stable leadership styles Snchez de Lozada was basically a challenger whose focus was solving problems that he considered priorities; the main difference between his two terms was the degree of openness to incoming information. Leonel Fernndez was essentially a respecter whose focus was in developing/maintaining a relationship with the powerful interests in place so that he could govern without fright; the main difference between his two presidencies was the identity of the keeper of those powerful interests : in his first term it was Balagu er and in the second the political and economical establishment. Garca was the president whose leadership style varied the most, which makes his case the most striking as he changed his re sponsiveness to constraints, his degree of openness to incoming i nformation and his focus. Fernndez exhibited a collegial leadership style whose focus was on reconciling differences and building consensus, on retaining power and authority by building relationships and taking advantage of opportunities. He was predis posed to compromise, depending on others to work with him to make things happen. As a hub for information, Fernndez was involved in all aspects of policy making without being a micro manager. This allowed him to share o n the accountability and the blame w ith others. Fernndez a summed the presidency under the shadow of Balague r the overpowerful incumbent and assumed his non confrontational position by becoming

PAGE 438

438 flexible positio n that involved building relationships via extensive communication with the threat of Balaguer in the opposition. his first presidency to his second In his first presidency he was generally more strategic ; he was an actively independent leader, interested in discussing and innovating issues but on his own terms and without compromising his power. In his second presidency his style shifted to expansionistic H e showed less willingness to receive input from the environment, while keeping his drive to achieve his policy goals. While being focused on solving problems, expansionistic style is manifested in his defensive reactions at a perceived threat W hen a bullet was found on the presidential chair after the confrontations of February 2003, he became aware of his precarious position, and was a conspiracy to remove him from power. Determined to continue with his agenda Snchez de Lozada exercised his authority and ad opted an intransigent position with protesters H is reaction to a blockade that involved extreme violence was broadly condemned. also changed from one presidency to the other. While in the first one he displayed an evangelistic leadership evangelistic style combined with impulsiveness played a significant role in the escalation of inflation during his first government, as he refused to assume the political costs of economic shock therapy. Because Garca perceived as a threat, he support ed for an obscure candidate, eventuall y catapulting Fujimori to

PAGE 439

439 the presidency. In his second administration Garca became more opportunisitic according to Hermann (2003) leaders with an opportunistic style have abilities to move between relationship building and openness to information from the environment. They predisposition leaned toward an evangelistic style of leadership, his learning experience after persecutions, sixteen years out of office, exiles and a lost e lection led him to beco more flexible in letting specialists do the job, and more sensitive to what was feasible and doable given the constraints. Being at the center of the information n etwork, he took advantage of what he perceived as opportunities from the environment and adapted his behavior accordingly. He understood that in order to be politically effective he needed to become more flexible and open. The ideal leadership style of a president for democracy is the actively independent leader. He is open to in formation and is able to read the cues of a changing the environment. He is a challenger of the constraints of the environment but he does not change the rules to benefit h im self since he puts the country first. Such p resident is guided by the desire to solve problems even at the expense of losing popularity and affecting those who supported h im in the first place. He listens, takes risks, and has the courage to be on h is own idea s. This kind of leader will probably be misunderstood in the short term; however h is legacy will be one of institutions because the ideas that guided h is actions envisioned the common good. While this kind of leader would navigate well at any point in th e life of a political order, h is impact will be more noticeable if h is presidency ocurrs at the beginning of a

PAGE 440

440 political order. H is presidency will therefore be a reconstructive presidency. The actively independent leader will have less impact during an ar ticulative presidency because he will need to challenge fewer constraints than in the reconstructive case, as the political order is resilient. In an articulative presidency t he problems of the day do not require solving major issues, and the leader will s eek to solve day to day problems. If the actively independent leader finds h is presidency at the end of a political order he will sacrifice h im self as he will realize t hat the ideas and the problems he considers im portant require solutions that he cannot provide. He will lose the support of those organized interests that he is affiliated with, but as he puts the country first, he will accept the fact th at new leadership is required. H e will step aside and let the political order disintegrate. He will real ize he is fungible and with his example democracy will benefit demonstrating that the ideals he held were mo re important than the policies he sought to implement, and the politics he had to fight. A president with the second most desirable leadership sty le for democracy is the opportunistic leader. As this leader is a respecter of constraints h is impact will always be less significant than the impact of a challenger. A president with any of the other leadership styles is either close d to information or f ocused on keeping or maintaining a relationship with his constituents. A leader closed to information is perhaps the most damaging trait for democracy as the leader stops representing his people since he does not receive feedback. A leader who is focuse d o n a relationship rather than on solv ing H e will care more about being popular than solving problems.

PAGE 441

441 Political Learning in Democratizing C ountries Table 10 4 summarizes the fi ndings of the dissertation. It shows the type of democratization process that the countries experienced as a consequence of the administration of each featured president during his two non consecutive terms, as well as t he types of political learning as a consequence of the variation (or not) in presidential leadership style between ter ms. The combination of the type of presidenc y based on political and secular time with the type of political learning at the individual level based on a acit y to learn from his experiences suggests that a if he learns from his mistakes. But it can be negative if he cannot adapt his behavior to new political dynamics, or if dela y s democratic advancement by reinforc ing a deleterious status quo. articulative and a second disjunctive presidency, illustrates that even though a first presidency was positive ove rall and the president led the country in a positive direction, there was no guarantee than his return to power would produce similar results. L ead ing a country by articulating commitments of ideology, and with the support of institutionalized interests is less problematic than lead ing a country when the political order and the coalition of interests that support his authority are both vulnerable. Although willing presidents may be guided by noble motives, they have no control over the direction and magnitu de of the approaching tide of change. They may be able to delay change and buy time for themselves, but in practical terms they cannot stop the tide. Structural conditions are stronger than voluntaristic efforts. For this reason, non

PAGE 442

442 immediate re election, often seen as a way to reduce the power of the president, should be reconsidered. political learning. When he returned to office, he was equipped with the same sets of motiva shaped the leadership style he used in his second term. B ut the context and the nature of the problems changed, and when Snchez de Lozada reassumed office with his establish ed vision, he found himself out of touch with the processes in which Bolivians were engaged. His efforts failed, because social processes unfolded faster than his understanding of the changing environment. He could not provide leadership, because he lacked to the cues of the environment, selecting only the information that fitted his established ideas, Snchez de Lozada failed to perceive the need for change. Snchez de Lozada is a case of political unlearning. Confrontation, inflexibility, and overuse of the monopoly presidency exacerbated an enervated political order. While these were actions th at democratic regression as he lost legitimacy, his own legitimacy as well as the legitimacy of the presidential office and the institutional architecture of the political system With an already weak political coalition from the presidency, and a power vacuum was created which eventually was f illed by political actors who opposed the institutional architecture in place an d held different

PAGE 443

443 The case of Leonel Fernndez in the Dominican Republic serves as an example of a president whose two articulative presidencies did not change the patterned arrangements of politics, nor did they change the structure of authority institutionalized by Balaguer. As a political actor, Fernndez exhibited political over learning which impedes or slows subsequent learning for new situations. In his first term he respected and maintained the political constraints that fit the existent clientelistic network developed by Balaguer. Although in his second term those constraints could have been challenged, his openness to receive the cues of the environment dictated passivity and accommodation, which in turn helped to m aintain the status quo. For this reason, during his presidencies the country experienced democratic stagnation The meager democratic progress did not change amid the timid presidential impulses and democratic transformation was not substantial in the Domi nican Republic. that of disjunctive presidency, with negative consequences for his country as well as for his own personal life, became an important lesson for Garca as a political player. After prosecutions, exiles and an a case of positive learning, as in his second administration he was ab le to recognize that the impact of his actions w as limited by the opportunities available within the structural patterns. With a robust order in place and with no intention to reinvent politics, his second presidency was articulative of both the existent c ommitments and of the patterns of politics. In his second presidency Garca adapted his behavior so that he respected political constraints. H e seemed to be more open to information from the

PAGE 444

444 environment and became less focused on strengthening relations w ith others than on attempting to erase the memories of his past administration. Moreover, he sought to build the image of a statesman who could attune to his country, and by doing so he may have open ed an opportunity for a third return to the presidency. T he consequences of positive learning helped democratic advancement, because he respected the existent democratic institutions that were gradually evolving since Valent n Paniagua (2000 2001) resuscitated them. While the three presidents with two non consecutive terms analyzed in this dissertation had disjunctive and articulative presidencies, the results suggest that presidents can strengthen or corrode democratic politics at any point in the life cycle of a political order. However, the president ial action effect is usually short term and marginal. The opportunities for leaders whose presidencies are disjunctive are more limited, as the room for maneuverability is more reduced, than in articulative presidencies. Seldom do historical conditions pre sent themselves so that the opportunity to reconstruct politics is possible. While virtually all presidents seek to differentiate from the previous administration and to affirm their authority and to transform politics all of them do so in different ways, but contribute only marginally. As Skowronek (1993) suggested, only a handful of U S presidents were effective in changing politics altogether; these are the reconstructive presidents: Jefferson, Jackson, Lincoln and F.D. Roosevelt. For the three countri es analyzed in this dissertation reconstructive presidents were Victor Paz (1985 1989) in Bolivia and Alberto Fujimori (1990 2001) in Peru, neither of whom were analyzed in depth in this dissertation.

PAGE 445

445 Other C ases A study of the other three Latin America n leaders, whose presidencies were circumscribed in the third wave with non consecutive presidencies but were not analyzed in this dissertation, is likely to confirm that comeback presidents are not necessarily good for democratization. At first sight, the second presidencies of Costa Mara Sanguinetti seemed to be more democratically challenging in comparison with their first terms. Costa Rica is widely considered the oldest and most stable democracy in Latin America. However, Oscar Arias who was president from 1986 to 1990 was able to have the Supreme Court interpret the Constitution in his favor so that he could run for re election. 1 Arias returned to power in 2006, sixteen years after h is first election, at the time when Costa Ricans were disappointed with politics by a sequence of corruption scandals and the imprisonment of two former presidents. Rafael Calderon (1990 1994) and Miguel ngel Rodrguez (1998 2002) Even though Arias had a highly regarded first term, 2 in which he pursued an aggressive liberalization leadership project that formed 3 he won a narrow victory over his rival after a manual recount of the votes and a series of legal challe nges. During his second administration Arias spent most of his political capital pushing for the approval of the Central American Free Trade Agreement (CAFTA) with the U S Under his lead, Costa Rica experienced the highest political polarization since 19 49, which was resolved with 1 The 1969 Costa Rican constitutional amendment banned re election, but Arias challenged the ban unsuccessfully in 2000 and then again in 2003 (Martinez Barahona 2010). 2 Despite slow progress in reducing economic disparity, Arias stepped down with close to 80 percent approval rating. See Gruson, Lindsey. "Costa Rica Elects New Leader Today New York Times (1990), available at rica elects new leader today.html 3 Arias agenda included trade and privatization, with only few deficitary State corporations being privatized.

PAGE 446

446 voters narrowly approving a referendum over the signing of CAFTA (Vargas Cullell, 2008). In Nicaragua, Daniel Ortega became president for the first time in 1984 H is first administration led to a mix of advancements and limita tions toward liberal democracy (Kampwirth, 2008; Anderson 2006; Anderson and Dodd, 2009, 2005; Hoyt, 1997). On one hand, it established the procedural foundation to contest power through elections and permitted the inclusion of the electorate, thereby allo wing vertical and horizontal mechanisms of accountability to expand. On the other, it granted vast executive authority that Ortega used to implement land reform among other sweeping land and social reforms. Toning down his former revolutionary rhetoric to seem moderate, after sixteen years and three electoral losses, in 2006 Ortega was narrowly re elected. 4 In his second term Ortega (2006 2011) benefited from an economic boost 5 H owever his administration moved increasingly toward centralization of power with a solid if ication of Barahona, 2010), the electoral tribunal and the police, as well as manipulati on of the political system (Anderson and Dodd, 2009; Bay, 2010). Ortega was re elected in 2011 for a third te rm after the Supreme Court interpreted that he was eligible for consecutive re election. 6 In Uruguay, Julio Mara Sanguinetti (1985 1990) was the first democratically elected president after thirteen years of military rule. In his first presidency, even t hough 4 The 1995 Nicaraguan constitutional reform allowed non consecutive re election only once. 5 Ortega maintained a market approach and kept close ties with leftist populists leaders, which allowed the country to receive substantial help from Venezuela's Hugo Chavez, who provided massive loans and cheap oil. 6 resisted. See Schmidt, Blake, "In Nic See also Hernandez, Javier C. "Nica raguan Leader Elicits Disgust and Support, Often from the Same People New York Times (2011), available at htt p:// leader ortega has wide support before election.html?_r=1&pagewanted=all

PAGE 447

447 he did not have a majority in Congress, he forged political agreements to pass key legislation 7 and to unify diverse parties against the specter of a military threat (Gillespie, 1992). He received informal support of the opposition figures, some of w hom participated in the cabinet without explicit support of their parties (Blake, 1998) Most importantly, he sought consensus when he sensed that Uruguayans were deeply concerned over the issue of human rights after one of the most repressive military gove rnments in Latin America, by pushing for amnesty for political prisoners and the military. 8 Unable to run for immediate re election, Sanguinetti waited for the next presidential cycle and was re elected for a second term in 1995 in a near three way dead he at without a plurality of popular vote. 9 His Colorado Party negotiated the 1996 constitutional reform, which strengthened executive power against the legislature and undertook a profound reform of the electoral system. 10 The reforms were later approved by a plebiscite. 11 During his second administration the social security system became a mixed, state private system, the country was decentralized and the central administration was reformed (Panizza, 2004). These three cases suggest that non consecutively re elected presidents have a harder time in their s econd terms than in their first terms, because the conditions they managed and the tenets they defended in their first terms changed during the time they were out of office in a way that they fail to grasp. 7 Economic reforms included liberalization of trade and fiscal discipline but did not include privatization. 8 The plebiscite passed in April 1989 (Altman, 2000). 9 Ley de Lemas stipulated that the winner was the most voted candidate from the most voted political party, which post elect ion gathered all party factions vote (De Riz, 1986). Sanguinetti was elected under the banner of the Colorado party made up of seventeen factions (Altman 2000). 10 It included a second round for the presidential race, which reduced factionalism and separati on of regional elections from national elections (Eaton, 2004). 11 The plebiscite took place in December 2006.

PAGE 448

448 Final Observations and C ontributions which are reflections of their personalities and which are expressed in their political actions shape and channel political structures bec ause their decisions at critical junctures shift the course of events. Presidential leadership style matters as it enables presidents to understand their roles in political time and the necessities of the times. With globalization and technological change, there is a great divide between the times in immediate consequences for current politics, it takes a long time for a country to democratize. This dissertation suggests that countries have different traject ories of democratic development, and that d emocratization is not a linear process in new democracies, as it was not for established democracies; it has periods of progress and backsliding, 12 as well as possibilities of stagn ation. If we are able to step back and conceive history cyclically, then democratic deepening is possible. However, it is necessary to remember that democracy takes more than a president, more than two terms, more than a generation, and more than a politic al order to develop. While the chances for democratic breakdown in Latin America are still possible, democratic breakdown does not happen when a president is simply deposed or replaced, or whether deposition or replacement occurs with military intervention or with civilian the past may teach that in order to understand democracy, we not only need to look at democratic waves, but rather, we should look at democracy as a slo w process that comes in tides. As Anderson (2005) reminds us, authors with negative perspectives of 12 Tilly (2007) calls these democratic changes democratization and de democratization.

PAGE 449

449 Latin American democracies who tend to idealize democracies elsewhere usually tend to be impatient with the long term processes and imperfections that democ racy entails. Democracy took a long time to develop in other regions and other times and is still continuously problematic. This dissertation has focused on the extent to which continuity is part of the democratization process. Most studies of democratiza tion emphasize the newness of continuities such that no new presidency is entirely a new slate. Neither in Latin America nor in the United States are presidents completely free to write their own slate. Instead they write upon a slate already filled with past events. There are assets and problems for their own agendas. Every presidency is in some way shaped by the context that preceded it. Recognizing the power of legacies is particularly important in Latin America today because democracy in most countries has approached a democracies are begin ing to resemble presidencies in established democracies. The conclusions of this dissertation draw from the empirical evidence of three cases. To some extent they are limited in perspective to Latin America, given tha t the region comprises more presidential systems that any other region in the wo rld. However the results speak in general terms to other developing democracies in three contexts. developed to understand American presidents, in countries other than the United States. To consider politics as cyclical helps compare leaders across time and space. Leadership is not limited to presidents, but it can be extended to the role of prime

PAGE 450

450 ministers and other heads of states, such as kings and princes. But such studies must avoid r i gid application of fr ames of analysis refined in the study of American Politics to Latin America or any other country The understanding of political orders, particularly in democratization, requires a broad sensitivity to the structure of the sta te and its policies and cultural specificities, 13 the notion of a relatively long period of political stability punctuated by brief but intense political upheavals. 14 The role of economic and soci al trends can also be regional or global; however a political orders length and timing depend on elites, programs, and ideologies, and the legitimacy granted by citizens, all of which are country specific. Second, this dissertation also suggests that Herm personal psychology is useful to unde and goals, as well as their views of their roles and the limits of their personal possibilities. While s or in the international actions in domestic politics. Third, aside from the formal powers of the president usually expressed in a constitution this dissertation demonstrate s that the roles of most presidents go beyond constitutional prerogatives. In this sense, presidents shape democratic contours instead of remaking politics altogether. Politics and the feasibility of leadership projects cannot escape circumstance, whether it is the slowly changing character of the political order or a rapidly moving call for reform. But politics is also about choice, about how elites 13 Defined as idiosyncratic customs and traditions. 14 In the case of de m ocratic political orders, periods of electoral stability (Key 1949, 1966) need to be taken into account, as the vote is the fairest institutional arrangement for coordinating political activity.

PAGE 451

451 behave in ways that affect the public realm, and how citizens respond to legitimacy claims. I n addition, this dissertation raises a red flag to those politicians, reformers and constitution designers who advocate for the extension of term limits. For instance, s ince the return of democratization in Latin America, many presidents have reformed the constitutions arguing their personal indispensability for comprehensive social and political change. 15 Among those who have promoted constitutional changes in order to allow immediate reelection are: Fernando Henrique Cardoso in Brazil, 16 Alvaro Uribe in Co lombia, 17 Evo Morales in Bolivia, 18 Rafael Correa in Ecuador, 19 Daniel Ortega in Nicaragua, and Hugo Chvez in Venezuela. 20 This dissertation also raises questions about recycled presidents who seek election after a hiatus, often preventing new party leader ship from emerging. Former presidents who used their name recognition and influence to run again unsuccesfully for office are: Eduardo Frei in Chile in 2009, Hiplito Meja in the Dominican Republic in 2004, Lucio Gutirrez in Ecuador in 2009, Daniel Orteg a in Nicaragua in 1990, 1996 and 2000, and Luis Alberto Lacalle in Uruguay in 1999 The question is not that re election per se undermines democracy (Navia, 2009); in fact arguments about public opinion supporting re election and even 15 See Penfold (2010). 16 In June 1997 the Senate a pproved a Constitutional amendment amid opposition denouncing vote buying and corruption. 17 In February 2010 the independent Colombian Constitutional Court ruled against the attempt of Uribe to succeed himself, after his successful maneuvers of the legisl ature, party system and public opinion. 18 In December 2007, 164 out of 255 members of the constitutional assembly passed a constitutional text by pressure of the Bolivian executive. Amid protests and an opposition boycott, the text was slightly changed, b ut in January 2009 a referendum passed a new constitution allowing immediate presidential election. Morales benefited from the constitutional change, being reelected in the elections of December 2009. 19 In September of 2008, a referendum passed the new con stitution, in which immediate reelection is possible. Correa has already benefited with this change, as he was reelected in April of 2009. The constituent assembly passed the text in July 2008 with pressure from Correa. 20 mediate re election after his first re election was defeated in the referendum of 2007. When he extended the re election prerogative to other elected posts in the referendum of 2009 the proposal passed, allowing any elected official the chance to run for o ffice indefinitely.

PAGE 452

452 improving accountabil ity have been put forward (Griner, 2009). But as time passes, conditions change and leaders need to adapt to the changes. L eaders need to retool and continue listening to their constituencies. In turn, citizens grant legitimacy both to project s and to the political order in which leaders seek to be re elected.

PAGE 453

453 Table 10 1. Presidents in political and secular time Strength of political order Relation with the contingent authority Order Opposed Affiliated Vulnerable Reconstructive Presidency Disjunctive presidency Alan Garca I Gonzalo Snchez de Lozada II Popular nationalistic Neoliberal Resilient Preemptive Presidency Articulative presidency Gonzalo Snchez de Lozada I Leonel Fernndez I and II Alan Garca II Neoliberal Neoli beral Neoliberal Table 10 Characteristic Snchez de Lozada Fernndez Garca First presidency Actively Independent Collegial Evangelistic Challenger/respecter Challenger Respecter Challeng er Belief can control events High Low High Need for power Low Moderate High Openness information Open Open Close Contextual complexity High High Low Self confidence Moderate High Low Motivation: Problem/relationship Problem Relationship Rel ationship Task vs. interpersonal focus Problem Relationship Relationship In group bias Low Moderate High Distrust of others Moderate Low High Second presidency Expansionistic Collegial Opportunistic Challenger/respecter Challenger Respecter Respecter Belief can control events High Low Moderate Need for power Moderate Moderate High Openness information Close Open Open Contextual complexity Low High High Self confidence High High Moderate Motivation: Problem/relationship Problem Relationship Problem Task vs. interpersonal focus Problem Relationship Problem In group bias High Low Moderate Distrust of others Leaning high Low Moderate

PAGE 454

454 Table 10 moti vation Motivation Responsiveness to constraints Openness to information Problem focus Relationship focus Challenger Closed Expansionistic Snchez de Lozada II Evangelistic Alan Garca I Challenger Open Actively independent Snchez de Lozada I Charismatic/Directive Respecter Closed Incremental Influential Respecter Open Opportunistic Alan Garca II Collegial Leonel Fernndez I and II Table 10 4 Presidencies, presidents and d emocratization Bolivia Dominican Republic Peru Preside nt Gonzalo Snchez de Lozada Leonel Fernndez Alan Garca First presidency Articulative Articulative Disjunctive Second presidency Disjunctive Articulative Articulative Leadership style (1 st Term) Actively independent Collegial Evangelistic Leadershi p style (2 nd Term) Expansionistic Collegial Opportunistic Unlearning Over learning Learning Democratization Democratic regression Democratic stagnation Democratic advancement

PAGE 455

455 APPENDIX A VARIATION I N DEMOCRATIZATION VARIAB LES I N LATIN AMERICAN COUNTRIES Freedom House Polity IV Freedom House Polity IV Year PR CL Status Polity 2 Year PR CL Status Polity 2 Bolivia Snchez de Lozada I (1993 1997) Bolivia Snchez de Lozada II (2002 2003) 1992 2 3 F 9 2001 1 3 F 9 1993 2 3 F 9 2002 2 3 F 9 1994 2 3 F 9 2003 3 3 PF 9 1995 2 4 PF 9 2004 3 3 PF 8 1996 2 3 F 9 1997 1 3 F 9 1998 1 3 F 9 Dominican Republic Leonel Fernndez I (1996 2000) Dominican Republic Le onel Fernndez II (2004 2008) 1995 4 3 PF 5 2003 3 2 F 8 1996 3 3 PF 8 2004 2 2 F 8 1997 3 3 PF 8 2005 2 2 F 8 1998 2 3 F 8 2006 2 2 F 8 1999 2 3 F 8 2007 2 2 F 8 2000 2 2 F 8 2008 2 2 F 8 2001 2 2 F 8 2009 2 2 F 8 Nicaragua Daniel Ortega I (1985 1990) Nicaragua Daniel Ortega II (2007 2012) 1984 5 5 PF 1 2006 3 3 PF 8 1985 5 6 PF 1 2007 3 3 PF 9 1986 5 5 PF 1 2008 4 3 PF 9 1987 5 4 PF 1 2009 4 4 PF 9 1988 5 5 PF 1 2010 4 4 PF 9 1989 1 2011 1990 3 3 PF 1 2012 1991 3 3 PF 6 2013 Peru Alan Garca I (1985 1990) Peru Alan Garca II (2006 2011) 1984 2 3 F 7 2005 2 3 F 9 1985 2 3 F 7 2006 2 3 F 9 1986 2 3 F 7 2007 2 3 F 9 1 987 2 3 F 7 2008 2 3 F 9 1988 2 3 F 7 2009 2 3 F 9 1989 2 4 PF 7 2010 2 3 F 9 1990 3 4 PF 8 2011 1991 3 5 PF 8 2012 Uruguay Julio Mara Sanguinetti I (1985 1990) Uruguay Julio Mara Sanguinetti II (1995 2000) 1984 5 4 PF 7 1994 2 2 F 10 1985 2 2 F 9 1995 2 2 F 10 1986 2 2 F 9 1996 1 2 F 10 1987 2 2 F 9 1997 1 2 F 10 1988 2 2 F 9 1998 1 2 F 10 1989 1 2 F 10 1999 1 2 F 10 1990 1 2 F 10 2000 1 1 F 10 1991 1 2 F 10 2001 1 1 F 10

PAGE 456

456 APPENDIX B DATA COLLECTION IN DEPTH INTERVIEWS The empirical materials supporting this dissertation consist of 51 face to face semistructured interviews and 2 telephone interviews Even though most interviewees agreed to be recorded many expresse d uneasiness in having their names revealed, therefore the author treated all interviews but those of the presidents as anonymous. The questionnaires in English and Spanish are included. Code Gender/relationship/occupation/status Interview date Pres ident Leonel Fernndez 7/27/2007 Anonymous DR #1 Male/Close adviser to the president 6/15,16/2007 Anonymous DR #2 Male/Close adviser/Friend/Private sector 6/4/2007 Anonymous DR #3 Male/Scholar/Former Minister not under Fernndez 5/16,18,20/2007 Anonymo us DR #4 Male/Scholar/Columnist 6/14/2007 Anonymous DR #5 Male/Scholar/Columnist 6/6/2007 Anonymous DR #6 Female/Scholar 6/6/2007 Anonymous DR #7 Male/Journalist/Former Public office holrder 6/5/2007 Anonymous DR #8 Male/Journalist/Private sector/Polit ical analyst 6/11/2007 Anonymous DR #9 Male/Journalist/Private sector/Political analyst 6/16/2007 Anonymous DR #10 Male/Journalist 6/11/2007 Anonymous DR #11 Male/Columnist/Political analyst 6/12/2007 Anonymous DR #12 Male/Researcher/International Orga nization 6/14/2007 Anonymous DR #13 Male/Journalist 6/6/2007 Anonymous DR #14 Male/Opposition politician 6/11/2007 Anonymous DR #15 Male/Journalist/Private sector/Political analyst 6/12/2007 President Gonzalo Snchez de Lozada 11/15/2007,8/7/2009, 4/3,15/2010 Anonymous BOL#1 Male/Opposition politician 5/2/10, 1/20/2011 Anonymous BOL#2 Male/SDL family member/adviser 3/17/2009 Anonymous BOL#3 Male/Scholar/Public office holder during SDL I 5/26/2010 Anonymous BOL#4 Male/Scholar 3/24/2011 Anonymou s BOL#5 Male/Scholar/Public office holder during SDL I 3/21/2011 Anonymous BOL#6 Male/Public Office holder/Political analyst 2/24/2010 Anonymous BOL#7 Male/Journalist/Private sector/Political analyst 9/17/2008 Anonymous BOL#8 Male/SDL family member 12/4 /2007 Anonymous BOL#9 Male/Opposition politician 6/7/2010 Anonymous BOL#10 Male/Journalist/High ranking position in 3/16/2010

PAGE 457

457 SDL government Anonymous BOL#11 Male/Politician/MNR 9/10/2008 Anonymous BOL#12 Male/Political analyst/NGO 6/30/2008 Anonymou s BOL#13 Males/Coalition politician 9/23/2008 Anonymous BOL#14 Male/Public Office holder/Political analyst 9/15/2008 Anonymous BOL#15 Female/Political scientist/Private sector 9/11/2008 Anonymous BOL#16 Male/SDL family member/adviser 3/5/2010 Anony mous PER#1 Male/Scholar 11/24/2009 Anonymous PER#2 Male/Former APRA leader 11/21/2009 Anonymous PER#3 Male/Journalist/Private sector/Political analyst 11/25/2009 Anonymous PER#4 Male/APRA/Minister 11/27, 30/2009 Anonymous PER#5 Male/Private sector/Pub lic office holder 11/23/2009 Anonymous PER#6 Male/Journalist/Private sector/Political analyst 11/24/2009 Anonymous PER#7 Male/APRA leader/Former Minister/Congressman 11/18/2009 Anonymous PER#8 Male//Public office holder/Close friend 11/24/2009 Anonymou s PER#9 Male/Private sector/Political analyst 11/20/2009 Anonymous PER#10 Female/Minister/independent 11/20/2009 Anonymous PER#11 Male/Journalist/Private sector/Close friend 11/26/2011 Anonymous PER#12 Male/Political analyst/Private sector 11/18/2009 A nonymous PER#13 Female/Scholar 11/19/2009 Anonymous PER#14 Male/Scholar/Public office holder 11/26/2011 Anonymous PER#15 Female/Former Minister/Independent 3/4/2010 Anonymous PER#16 Male/Public Office holder/Political Analyst 11/18/2009 Anonymous PER# 17 Male/Journalist/Private sector/Political analyst 11/25/2009 Anonymous PER#18 Female/PP Leader/Opposition 2/25/2010 Anonymous PER#19 Male//Public office holder 6/9/2009 Anonymous PER#20 Male/Scholar 7/9/2009 Anonymous PER#21 Male/Scholar 11/19/2009

PAGE 458

458 Newspapers and Magazines Listin Diario Diario Libre Hoy Ultima Hora Presencia El Diario Caretas La Republica El Peruano

PAGE 459

459 List of Countries on Database Afghanistan Guinea Bissau ROK Algeria Haiti Russia Angola Honduras Rwanda Arg entina Iran Saudi Arabia Armenia Iraq Senegal Azerbaijan Israel Sierra Leone Bahrain Jordan Somalia Belarus Kazakhstan Spain Benin Kenya Sri Lanka Bhutan Kuwait Sudan Bolivia Kyrgyzstan Suriname Brazil Lebanon Swaziland Brunei Lesot ho Syria Burkina Faso Liberia Taiwan Burundi Libya Tajikistan C. Verde Is. Lithuania Tanzania Cameroon Madagascar Timor Leste Cent. Af. Rep. Malawi Togo Chad Maldives Tunisia Chile Mali Turk Cyprus Colombia Mauritania Turkmenistan Comor o Is. Mexico UAE Congo Moldova Uganda Costa Rica Mongolia Ukraine Cote d'Ivoire Morocco Uruguay Croatia Mozambique USA Cyprus Myanmar Uzbekistan Djibouti Nepal Venezuela Dom. Rep. Namibia Yemen (AR) Ecuador Nicaragua Yemen (PDR) El Sal vador Niger Yugoslavia Eq. Guinea Nigeria Zaire (Dem. Rep. of Congo) Ethiopia Oman Zambia Gabon Pakistan Gambia Panama GDR Paraguay Georgia Peru Ghana Philippines Guatemala Poland Guinea Qatar

PAGE 460

460 APPENDIX C SEMI STRUCTURED INT ERVIEW GUIDE FOR PRE SIDENTS Introduce myself, explaining why it is important that I talk to him, being explicit about the objectives of my dissertation and the interest in learning about his particular case. Read and handle informed consent form (when ap plied) 1. Tell me about your early life and how you became interested in politics. 2. Tell me about the most influential events that shaped your political views. 3. Tell me about the most influential people that shaped your political views. 4. Tell me about how you g o making decisions with regard to whom to surround yourself with. 5. Tell me about your view of democracy. 6. Tell me about the difference between the president as a public person and the private person. 7. Tell me when, where, and how did you learn the most impor tant things to be a president. 8. while also describing what makes a bad president? 9. statesman? A businessman First te rm 10. Tell me about the process of making the decision to run for President the first time. 11. Tell me about the reasons why you think you won the presidency the first time. 12. Tell me about the ways in which you learned about the needs and wants of the people. 13. Te ll me about the ways in which you connected with voters and people in general. 14. Tell me about the toughest decisions you made in your first term. 15. Tell me about the state of the State, and the country when you first assumed office, how different things were from what you expected? 16. Tell me about the things/policies/decisions that you are most proud of accomplished or done during your first term. 17. Tell me about the most critical moments during your first term. 18. Tell me about the vision you had for your country wh en running the first time. 19. Tell me about the team members that were most helpful and critical during your first term. 20. Tell me what you thought your countrymen needed and were asking for in your leadership during your first term. 21. Tell me about the biggest o bstacles you encountered in the implementation of your plans during your first term. 22. Tell me about how was your life, your personal life or personal space during your first term. 23. How do you think was your image your countrymen kept of you after your first term?

PAGE 461

461 24. What did you felt you left out in your first term? 25. After your first term, what did you think changed on you as a person? 26. Tell me about the best lessons you learned from governing the first time. Second term 27. Tell me about the process of making the de cision to run for President the second time. 28. Tell me about the reasons why you think you won the presidency the second time. 29. Tell me about the ways in which you learned about the needs and wants of the people. 30. Tell me about the ways in which you connected with voters and people in general. 31. Tell me about the most though decisions you made in your second term. 32. Tell me about the state of the State, and the country when you assumed office for the second time, how different things were from what you expected? 33. Te ll me about the things/policies/decisions that you are most proud of accomplished or done during your second term. 34. Tell me about the most critical moments during your second term. 35. Tell me about the vision you had for your country when running the second ti me. 36. Tell me about the team members that were most helpful and critical during your second term. 37. Tell me what you thought your countrymen needed and were asking for in your leadership during your second term. 38. Tell me about the biggest obstacles you encounte red in the implementation of your plans during your second term. 39. Tell me about how was your life, your personal life or personal space during your second term. 40. How do you think was your image your countrymen kept of you after your second term? 41. What did you felt you left out in your second term? 42. Tell me about the best lessons you learned from governing the second time. 43. After your second term, what did you think changed on you as a person?

PAGE 462

462 APPENDIX D SEMI STRUCTURED INTERVIEW GUIDE FOR PRESIDENTS Introduce myself, explaining why it is important that I talk to him, being explicit about the objectives of my dissertation and the interest in learning about his particular case. Read and handle informed consent form (when applied) 1. Tell me about how you got to know the president. 2. Tell me about your position or relationship with the [president's administration] during his first and second terms. 3. Tell me about the difference between the president as a public person and the private person. 4. Tell me about your experience and your assessment about the style of making decisions of the president. 5. Tell me about your experience and your assessment about the way the president communicates with his countrymen, and his sources of input. 6. Tell me about the hardest m oments you experienced as part of the circle of the president, and the hardest moments you think the president experienced during his first and second terms. 7. Tell me about the biggest obstacles you think the president encountered in the implementation of h is plans during his first and second terms. 8. Tell me your opinion about personal characteristics of the president that might have contributed to give a special character to his presidency, first and second terms. 9. Tell me your opinion about the president's biggest successes and regrets in the first and second terms. The differences between terms. 10. Tell me about the legacy you think the president wanted to be remembered for in his first and second terms, and as his legacy as a statesman.

PAGE 463

463 APPENDIX E SEMI S TRUCTURED INTERVIEW GUIDE FOR SCHOLARS, ANALYSTS, JOURNALISTS Introduce myself, explaining why it is important that I talk to him, being explicit about the objectives of my dissertation and the interest in learning about his particular case. Read and han dle informed consent form (when applied) 1. Tell me about your general view of [president's name] presidency during his first and second terms. 2. Tell me about your position or relationship with the [president's administration] during his first and second term s. 3. Tell me about the difference between the president as a public person and the private person. 4. Tell me about your experience and your assessment about the style of making decisions of the president. 5. Tell me about your experience and your assessment abou t the way the president communicates with his countrymen, and his sources of input. 6. Tell me about the hardest moments you think the president experienced during his first and second terms. 7. Tell me about the biggest obstacles you think the president encount ered in the implementation of his plans during his first and second terms. 8. Tell me your opinion about personal characteristics of the president that might have contributed to give a special character to his presidency, first and second terms. 9. Tell me your opinion about the president's biggest successes and regrets in the first and second terms. The differences between terms. 10. Tell me about the legacy you think the president wanted to be remembered for in his first and second terms, and as his legacy as a st atesman.

PAGE 464

464 LIST OF REFERENCES Aberbach, James, James D. Chesney, and B.A. Rockman. "Exploring Elite Political Attitudes: Some Methodological Lessons." Political Methodology 2 (1975): 1 27. Adler, Patricia A., and Peter Adler. "The Reluctant Respondent." In Handbook of Interview Research: Context & Method edited by Jaber F. Gubrium and James A. Holstein, xiii, 981 p. Thousand Oaks, Calif.: Sage Publications, 2002. Albo, Xavier. "The "Long Memory" Of Ethnicity in Bolivia and Some Temporary Oscillations." I n Unresolved Tensions : Bolivia Past and Present edited by John Crabtree and Laurence Whitehead, ix, 309 p. Pittsburgh, Pa.: University of Pittsburgh Press, 2008. Aldrich, John. Why Parties? The Origin and Transformation of Political Parties in America C hicago: The University of Chicago Press, 1995. Aleman, Eduardo, and Thomas Schwartz. "Presidential Vetoes in Latin American Constitutions." Journal of Theoretical Politics 18 (2006): 98 120. Alexander, Robert J. "Bolivia's Democratic Experiment." Current H istory 84, no. 499 (1985): 73 76. Almond, G. A., and S. J. Genco. "Clouds, Clocks, and Study of Politics." World Politics 29, no. 4 (1977): 489 522. Altman, D. "The Politics of Coalition Formation and Survival in Multi Party Presidential Democracies the Case of Uruguay, 1989 1999." Party Politics 6, no. 3 (2000): 259 83. Ames, Barry. Political Survival : Politicians and Public Policy in Latin America California Series on Social Choice and Political Economy Berkeley: University of California Press, 1987. Amorim Neto, Octavio. Presidencialismo E Gobernabilidade Nas Americas Rio de Janeiro: FGV Konrad Adenauer, 2006. Andersen, Lykke E., and Robert Faris. "Natural Gas and Inequality in Bolivia." 28: Andean Competitiveness Project, 2003. Anderson, Leslie. The Authoritarian Executive? Horizontal and Vertical Accountability in Nicaragua." LATIN AMERICAN POLITICS AND SOCIETY 48, no. 2 (2006): 141 69. "Democracy, Executive Power and the Welfare State." 2011. Anderson, Leslie, and Lawrence Dodd. "Nicaragua : Progress Amid Regress?" Journal of Democracy 20, no. 3 (2009): 153 67.

PAGE 465

465 Anderson, Leslie, and Lawrence C. Dodd. Learning Democracy : Citizen Engagement and Electoral Choice in Nicaragua, 1990 2001 Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2005. Anderson, Les lie E. "Idealism, Impatience, and Pessimism: Recent Studies of Democratization in Latin America." Latin America Research Review 40, no. 3 (2005). Anderson, Lisa. "The Ex Presidents." Journal of Democracy 21, no. 2 (2010): 64 78. Anthony Faiola, Washington Post Foreign Service. "Bolivia's Ex President Regains Post;Legislature Picks U.S. Educated Millionaire over Leader of Coca Farmers." The Washington Post August 5, 2002, A09. APOYO. "Encuestas." April 22 27. Lima APOYO, 1985. "Resultados Encuestas." L ima APOYO, 1985 2011. Aquino, Jose Angel. "Cuota Femenina Y Representacion Politica En Republica Dominicana Elecciones Del 2010." In V Congreso Latinoamericano de Ciencia Politica Buenos Aires: ALACIP 2010. Arequipa, Marcelo "Composicin Y Estructura De L as lites Parlamentarias En Bolivia a Travs De Sus Caractersticas Sociodemogrficas (1985 2005)." In Universidad Autnoma de Madrid Madrid, 2010. Arze Cuadros, Eduardo El Programa Del Mnr Y La Revolucin Nacional La Paz: Plural Editores, 2002. "Ases or De Percovich Vinculado a La Mafia Del Narcotrafico". La Republica August 5 1985, 2 3. Avil s, Jaime. "El Problema De Bolivia ''Es Que Se Qued Sin Proyecto Nacional''." Jornada July 25th 2005. Ayuso, Juan Jose. Pagar O Matar Santo Domingo: Libreria T rinitaria, 2002. Baliev, Mikhail. "Presidential Power and Consolidation of New Post Communist Democracies." Comparative Political Studies 39, no. 3 (2006). Balz, John. "Ready to Lead on Day One: Predicting Presidential Greatness from Political Experience." PS: Political Science & Politics 43, no. 03 (2010): 487 92. Barber, James David. The Presidential Character; Predicting Performance in the White House 1992 ed. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.,: Prentice Hall, 1972. Barja, Gover. "Bolivian Structural Reforms and T heir Impact on Investment." (1999). Bates, Robert H. Analytic Narratives Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 1998.

PAGE 466

466 Bay, Kelly. "The Return of the Left in Nicaragua: Citizen Power Councils, Pro Poor Social Services and Regime Consolidation." In A PSA 2010 Washington, DC, 2010. Bedregal, Guillermo. Bolivia Como Problema La Paz Instituto de Investigaciones, Capacitacin y Formacin Democrtica "Carlos Montenegro", 2008. De Buhos, Politicas Y Exilios: Mis Memorias Edited by Capacitacion y Forma cion Democratica Carlos Montenegro Instituto de Investigacion. La Paz Juckumarka, 2010 Victor Paz Estenssoro, El Politico: Una Semblanza Critica 1. ed. Mexico: Fondo de Cultura Economica, 1999. Bermeo, Nancy. "Democracy and the Lessons of Dictatorsh ip." Comparative Politics 24, no. 3 (1992): 273 91. "Interests, Inequality, and Illusion in the Choice for Fair Elections." Comparative Political Studies 43, no. 8/9 (2010): 1119 47. Bermeo, Nancy Gina. Ordinary People in Extraordinary Times : The Ci tizenry and the Breakdown of Democracy Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 2003. Biffi, Pablo "Entrevista Exclusiva Alan Garca: Yo Era Un Agitador Continental Pero Ahora Tengo Mas Modestia." Clarin June 11 2006. Birdsall, Nancy, Augusto de la To rre, and Felipe Valencia Caicedo. "The Washington Consensus: Assessing a Damaged Brand." Washington, DC Center for Global Development, 2010. Birnir, Jhanna Kristn. "Stabilizing Party Systems and Excluding Segments of Society?: The Effects of Formation C osts on New Party Foundation in Latin America." Studies in Comparative International Development 39, no. 3 (2004): 3 27. Blair, Tony. A Journey My Political Life New York: Alfred A. Knopf, 2010. Blake, C. H. "Economic Reform and Democratization in Argentin a and Uruguay: The Tortoise and the Hare Revisited?" Journal of Interamerican Studies and World Affairs 40, no. 3 (1998): 1 26. Blondel, Jean. Political Leadership : Towards a General Analysis London ; Beverly Hills: Sage Publications, 1987. Blondel, Jean and Michael Curtis. Introduction to Comparative Government 3rd ed. New York, N.Y.: HarperCollins College Publishers, 1993. Bond, Jon R., and Richard Fleisher. The President in the Legislative Arena Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1990.

PAGE 467

467 Boyton, Ra chel "Our Brand Is Crisis ", documentary 85 min. United States: Koch Lorber Films, 2005. Brady, Henry E., and David Collier. Rethinking Social Inquiry : Diverse Tools, Shared Standards Lanham, Md.: Rowman & Littlefield, 2004. Brea, Ramonina, Isis Duarte, R amon Tejada, and Clara Bez. "Estado De Situacin De La Democracia Dominicana (1978 1992)." Santo Domingo, 1995. Brea, Ramonina, Rosario Espinal, and Fernando Valerio Holguin, eds. La Repblica Dominicana. En El Umbral Del Siglo Xxi. Cultura, Poltica Y C ambio Social. Santo Domingo, 1999. Brooker, Paul. Leadership in Democracy : From Adaptive Response to Entrepreneurial Initiative Houndmills, Basingstoke, Hampshire ; New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2005. Bueno de Mesquita, Bruce, Alastair Smith, Randolph Siverson, and James D. Morrow. The Logic of Political Survival Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, 2003. Bunce, Valerie. "Comparative Democratization: Big and Bounded Generalizations." Comparative Political Studies 33, no. 6/7 (2000): 703 34. Burdman, Julio "En trevista a Mayorga, Rene Antonio "Sin La Rgida Poltica De Erradicacin De La Hoja De Coca No Habra Habido Evo Morales"." Observatorio Electoral Latinoamericano (2002), 20a Burgess, Katrina, and Steven Levitsky. "Explaining Populist Party Adaptation in Latin America: Environmental and Organizational Determinants of Party Chan ge in Argentina, Mexico, Peru, and Venezuela." Comparative Political Studies 36, no. 8 (2003): 881 911. Burns, James MacGregor. Leadership 1st ed. New York: Harper & Row, 1978. Roosevelt: Soldier of Freedom 1940 1945 : Houghton Mifflin Harcourt, 1970. Byman, D., and Pollack K. "Let Us Now Praise Great Men: Bringing the Stateman Back In." International Security 25, no. 4 (2001): 107 46. Caballero, Gerardo. "Generaciones Apristas Enfrentadas." El Comercio May 3, 2009. Caldern Gutirrez, Fernando Ahora Si Que Si Y Si No Por Que. Gobernabilidad, Competividad E Integracin Social La Paz, Bolivia: CEDLA, Centro de Estudios para el Desarrollo Laboral y Agrario, 1996. "Cancha Incierta." In Caretas Lima 2009.

PAGE 468

468 Canes Wrone, B., and S. de Marchi. "Presidential Approval and Legislative Success." Journal of Politics 64, no. 2 (2002): 491 509. "The Caribbean: Hurricane Georges." Miami Herald May 17 1999. Carroll, Royce and Matthew Soberg Shugart. "Neo Madisonian Theory and Latin American Institutions Cassa, Ro berto and Fred Murphy. "Recent Popular Movements in the Dominican Republic." Latin American Perspectives 22, no. 3 (1995): 80 93. Cavero, Elizabeth. "Retratos Del Poder: Alan Garca Perez. No Una, Sino Dos Veces." La Republica March 12th 2006. Centella s, Miguel. "The Consolidation of Polyarchy in Bolivia, 1985 1997." In 57th Annual Meeting of theMidwest Political Science Association Chicago, 1999. "Cesan a 37 Generales De La Gc Y De La Policia De Investigaciones." La Republica August 20 1985, 2 3. Chei bub, Jos Antnio. Presidentialism, Parliamentarism, and Democracy Cambridge Studies in Comparative Politics. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press, 2007. Cheibub, Jos Antonio, and Adam Przeworski. "Democracy, Elections, and Accountability for Econom ic Outcomes." In Democracy, Accountability and Representation edited by Adam Przeworski, Susan Carol Stokes and Bernard Manin. Cambridge Cambridge University Press, 1999. Chu, Yun han. Michael. Bratton, Marta. Lagos Cruz Coke, Sandeep. Shastri, and Ma rk A. Tessler. "Public Opinion and Democratic Legitimacy." Journal of Democracy 19, no. 2 (2008). Cisneros, Renato "Elecciones 2006. Perfil Del Candidato Alan Garca." El Comercio March 25th 2006. CNE, Corte Nacional Electoral Resultados Electorales L a Paz, Bolivia: CNE, 1980 2007. "Con El Cuco En Paris ". Caretas 1536 1998. Conaghan, Catherine M. "Ecuador: Correa's Plebiscitary Presidency." Journal of Democracy 19, no. 2 (2008): 46 60. Conaghan, Catherine M. and Rosario Espinal. "Unlikely Transi tions to Uncertain Regimes? Democracy without Compromise in the Dominican Republic and Ecuador Journal of Latin American Studies 22, no. 3 (1990): 553 74.

PAGE 469

469 Contreras, Carlos and Marcos Cueto. Historia Del Per Contemporneo Lima: Red para el Desarrollo de las Ciencias Sociales en el Per, Universidad del Pacifico, 1999. Coppedge, Michael. "The Dynamic Diversity of Latin American Party Systems." Party Politics 4, no. 4 (1998): 547 68. Cortez, Julie. "'I'm a Great Believer'; Ousted Bolivian President Sees Globalization as Key to Latin American Salvation." El Hispanic News October 6 2004, Pg. 1,2. Cotler, Julio. "Building Democratic Institutions: Party Systems in Latin America." In Building Democratic Institutions: Party Systems in Latin America edited by Scott Mainwaring and Timothy R. Scully, 323 53. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1995. "Military Interventions And "Transfer of Power to Civilians" In Peru." In Transitions from Authoritarian Rule: Latin America edited by Guillermo O'Donnell, P hilippe Schmitter and Laurence Whitehead, xii, 244 p. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1986. Cotler, Julio Clases, Estado Y Nacin En El Per 2005 ed. Lima: Instituto de Estudios Peruanos 1978. Crabtree, J. Perfiles De La Protesta: Politica Y M ovimientos Sociales En Bolivia La Paz: Fundacion PIEB, 2005. Crabtree, J., and Jim Thomas, eds. El Per De Fujimori: 1990 1998 Lima: Universidad del Pacifico, Centro de Investigacin, 1999. Crabtree, John. "Neopopulismo Y El Fenomero Fujimori In El Per De Fujimori: 1990 1998 edited by John Crabtree and J. J. Thomas, 45 71. Lima Per: Universidad del Pacifico, Centro de Investigacin, 1999. Cran, William, and Daniel Yergin. "Interview: Juan Cariaga." In Commanding Heights 2001. Cran, Wil liam, and Danie l Yergin. "Interview: Gonzalo Snchez De Lozada." In Commanding Heights 2001. Cronin, T., and Michael Genovese. The Paradoxes of the American Presidency 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2004. Cruz, Edmundo. "El Poder De Vega Vega." La Republica August 2 2009. De la Quintana, Ana Mar a. "El Proceso De Toma De Decisiones En La Comision De Constitution, Justicia Y Policia Judicial De La Camara De Diputados." Licenciatura, Univeridad Nuestra Seora de La Paz, 2000.

PAGE 470

470 De la Rosa, Adalberto. "Mayora Mie mbros Comit Poltico Pld Han Sido Funcionarios En Sus Gobiernos." Hoy 15 Agosto 2009. De Paz, Maribel. "Luis Bedoya Reyes Noventa (Y Pico)." In Caretas Lima 2009. De Riz, Liliana. "Politics and Parties Exercise of Comparative Analysis in Argentina, C hile, Brazil and Uruguay." Desarrollo Economico Revista De Ciencias Sociales 25, no. 100 (1986): 659 82. De Sousa Santos, Boaventura. "El Foro Social Mundial Y La Izquierda Global In Repensar La Poltica Desde Amrica Latina edited by Raphael Hoetmer. L ima Programa Democracia y Transformacin Global, 2009. "A Deadly Spree for Georges." New York Times October 4 1998. "Defensa Y Desafio." Caretas 947 March 23 1987. Desco. "Resumen Semanal." 12. Lima Desco 1980. Dewan, Torun, and David Myatt. "The Qualitie s of Leadership: Direction, Communication, and Obfuscation." American Political Science Review 102, no. 3 (2008): 351 68. Di Palma, Giuseppe. To Craft Democracies : An Essay on Democratic Transitions Berkeley: University of California Press, 1990. Diamond Larry J., Jonathan Hartlyn, Juan J. Linz, and Seymour Martin Lipset, eds. Democracy in Developing Countries: Latin America 2nd. ed. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner Publishers, 1999. Diamond, Larry Jay. Developing Democracy : Toward Consolidation Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1999. Diamond, Larry Jay, Juan J. Linz, and Seymour Martin Lipset. Democracy in Developing Countries: Latin America Boulder, Colo. London: L. Rienner; Adamantine Press, 1988. Diamond, Larry Jay, Marc F. Plattner, and Diego Abente Brun. Latin America's Struggle for Democracy Baltimore, Md.: Johns Hopkins University Press, 2008. Diamond, Stuart. Getting More: How to Negotiate to Achieve Your Goals in the Real World New York: Random House 2010. "Diario Tiempo Argentino Public a Entrevista a Esposa Del Presidente." El Peruano March 14 1986, 3. Diehl, Jackson. "Pragmatic Leader Emerging in Peru." Washington Post Dec 31 1984, A8.

PAGE 471

471 Dietz, Henry. "Electoral Politics: In Peru, 1978 1986." Journal of Interamerican Studies and World A ffairs 28, no. 4 (1986): 139 63. "Discurso Pronunciado Por El Primer Mandatario De La Nacion, Dr. Alan Garca Perez En La Ciudad De Ica." El Peruano May 4 1986. Dore Cabral, Carlos and Esther Hernandez Medina. "Un Proyecto De Nacion: Propuestas Elaboard as Por La Sociedad Dominicana ", edited by Documento Base para el Dialogo Nacional. Santo Domingo 1998 Downs, Robert A. An Economic Theory of Democracy New York: Harper and Row, 1957. Drinot, Paulo. "The Meaning of Alan Garca: Sovereignty and Government ality in Neoliberal Peru Journal of Latin American Cultural Studies 20, no. 2 (2011): 179 95. Dulles, John W. F. Vargas of Brazil: A Political Biography Austin: University of Texas Press, 1967. Eaton, K. "Risky Business: Decentralization from above in C hile and Uruguay." Comparative Politics 37, no. 1 (2004): 1 +. Edwards, George. "Neustadt's Power Approach." In Presidential Power : Forging the Presidency for the Twenty First Century edited by Robert Y. Shapiro, Martha Joynt Kumar and Lawrence R. Jacobs New York: Columbia Univeristy Press, 2000. Edwards, George, and Andrew Barrett. "Presidential Agenda Setting in Congress." In Polarized Politics : Congress and the President in a Partisan Era edited by Jon R. Bond and Richard Fleisher, 123 25. Washingto n, D.C.: CQ Press, 2000. Edwards, George C. At the Margins : Presidential Leadership of Congress New Haven: Yale University Press, 1989. "Presidential Rhetoric: What Difference Does It Make?", 1993. The Public Presidency : The Pursuit of Popular Support New York: St. Martin's Press, 1983. Edwards, George C., John H. Kessel, and Bert A. Rockman. Researching the Presidency : Vital Questions, New Approaches Pitt Series in Policy and Institutional Studies. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press 1993. Edwards, George C., and Stephen J. Wayne. Presidential Leadership: Politics and Policy Making 6th ed. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth/Thomson Learning, 2003. EFE. "Alan Garca Wins Peruvian Presidency ", Monday, June 5, 2006 2006.

PAGE 472

472 Eisenstadt, S. N., and Lu is Roniger. "The Study of Patron Client Relations and Recent Developments in Sociological Theory." In Political Clientelism, Patronage, and Development edited by S. N. Eisenstadt and Renee Lemarchand, 332. Beverly Hills: Sage Publications, 1981. "El Apra Partido De Proyeccion Continental En El Gobierno." El Peruano July 29 1985. "El Mas Quiere Presidir Un Gobierno Desde Las Calles." La Razon July 5 2002. "El Peru Avanzo 100 Metros En Dos Anos Pero En Estos Ultimos Meses Reotrdecdio Cincuenta Dijo El Presi dente"." El Peruano June 30 1987. El Poder en el Peru. "Los 10 Peruanos Mas Poderosos." 1983 2011. "Los 10 Peruanos Mas Poderosos." 1980 2011. "El Reventon Del Setimo." Caretas 1471 June 6 1997. Electoral, Junta Central. "Boletin No.9." (JCE) "Boletin No.10." (JCE) Elgie, Robert. Political Leadership in Liberal Democracies Comparative Government and Politics. New York: St. Martin's Press, 1995. "What Is Semi Presidentialism and Where Is It Found?" In Semi Presidentialism Outside Europe edited by Robert Elgie and Sophia Moestrup. New York: Routledge, 2007. Encarnacion, Omar. "Beyond Transitions: The Politics of Democratic Consolidation." Comparative Politics 32, no. 4 (2000): 479 98. "Erre Con Erre, Corrupcin ". Caretas 1645 November 16 2000. ""Escandalo "One Dolar" Remece a La Pip" ". La Republica August 1 1985, 18 19 "Especulaciones Sobre Lac." Caretas 927 Ocotber 27 1986. Espinal, Rosario. "Autoritarismo Y Democracia En La Poltica Dominicana." San Jos, Costa Rica: Ediciones Capel 1987. "Economic Restructuring, Social Protest and Democratization in the Dominican Republic." Latin American Perspectives 22 (1995): 63 79. "Limited Engagement in Policy Making: Legislative and Civil Society in the Dominican Republic." 21. New York, 2004. Espinal, Rosario, and Jacqueline Jimnez Polanco. "El Financiamiento De Los Partidos Politicos En El Republica Dominicana." 1998.

PAGE 473

473 Evia, Jose Luis, Roberto Laserna, and Stergios Skaperdas. Conflicto Social Y Crecimiento Economico En Bolivia Co chabamba, Bolivia: CERES, 2008. Fenno, Jr. Richard F. Going Home: Black Representatives and Their Constituents Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2003. Home Style: House Members in Their Districts New York: Harper Collins Publishers, 1978. Ferrey ros, Cecilia Rosales. "a Quines Escucha El Presidente?" El Comercio September 10, 2007. Fiorina, Morris. Retrospective Voting in American National Elections New Haven: Yale University Press, 1981. Forero, Juan. "Economic Crisis and Vocal Opposition Tes t Bolivia's President ", February 16, 2003 2003, 3. "Unrest Clouds Bolivia Leader's Future The New York Times March 10th 2003, 6. Forero, Juan "U.S. Aid Foe Is in Runoff for President of Bolivia The New York Times July 10 2002, Pg. 5. Fraga, Arm inio. "Latin America since the 1990s: Rising from the Sickbed?" Journal of Economic Perspectives 18, no. 2 (2004): 89 106. Freedom, House. "Freedom in the World 2011." Freedom House 2011. Fukuyama, Francis. The End of History and the Last Man New York Tor onto: Free Press ; Maxwell Macmillan Canada ;Maxwell Macmillan International, 1992. Falling Behind : Explaining the Development Gap between Latin America and the United States Oxford ; New York: Oxford University Press, 2008. Fukuyama, Francis, Bjorn Dressel, and Chang Boo Seung. "Facing the Perils of Presidentialism?" Journal of Democracy 16, no. 2 (2005). Fundacion, Milenio, ed. Las Reformas Estructurales En Bolivia Temas De La Modernizacion La Paz Fundacion Milenio, 1998. Gamarra, Eduardo A. "Boli via on the Brink." The Center of Preventive Action, 2007. "Bolivia: Managing Democracy in the 1990s." In Structuring Democratic Governance:South America in the 1990s edited by Jorge Dominguez and Abraham F. Lowenthal, 72 98. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1996. "Has Bolivia Won the War?" In Working Paper Miami: Florida International University, 2002.

PAGE 474

474 Gamarra, Eduardo A. "Cuando La Innovacin No Es Suficiente: Ruptura Democrtica En Bolivia In Nuevos Horizontes Andinos. Escenarios Regionales Y Polticas De La Unin Europea edited by Christian Freres and Karina Pacheco. Caracas: AIETI/RECAL/Ed. Nueva Sociedad. 2002. Gamarra, Eduardo A., and James M. Malloy. "The Patrominial Dynamics of Party Politics in Bolivia In Building De mocratic Institutions : Party Systems in Latin America edited by Scott Mainwaring and Timothy Scully, xix, 578 p. Stanford, Calif.: Stanford University Press, 1995. Gandhi, Jennifer, and Adam Przeworski. "Authoritarian Institutions and the Survival of Aut ocrats." Comparative Political Studies 40, no. 11 (2007): 1279 301. Garay, Carolina, and Martn Tanaka. "Las Protestas En El Peru Entre 1995 Y El 2006." In Entre El Crecimiento Economico Y La Insatisfaccion Social: Las Protestas Sociales En El Peru Actual edited by Romeo Grompone and Martn Tanaka, 59 124. Lima: Instituto de Estudios Peruanos 2009. Garca, Alan. Modernid@D Y Politic@ En El Siglo Xxi : Globalizacion Con Justicia Social 1st American pbk. ed. Rockville, MD: Red & White Publishers, 2005. Garc a, Alan. El Futuro Diferente: La Tarea Historica Del Apra Lima, Per: JALSA, 1982. El Mundo De Maquiavelo : Drama Y Comedia De Una Dictadura 1. ed, Temas De Actualidad. Bogot: Tercer Mundo Editores, 1994. Para Comprender El Siglo Xx Y Comenza r El Siglo De La Juventud Lima: Universidad San Martn de Porres, 2004. Garca Montero, Mercedes. "Bolivia." In Partidos Politicos En America Latina: Paises Andinos edited by Manuel Alcntara Sez and Flavia Freidenberg, 33 137: Ediciones Universidad de Salamanca, 2001. Garca Perez, Alan. Mi Gobierno Hizo La Regionalizacion: Fujimori La Destruyo En Un Ano : Editorial Presente, 1999. Garca Prez, Alan. La Revolucion Regional Lima, Peruu: DESA, 1990. "Garca Se Despide." El Peruano July 26 1990. Geddes, B arbara. Paradigms and Sand Castles: Theory Building and Research Design Ann Harbor: University of Michigan Press, 2003. "What Do We Know About Democratization after Twenty Years?" American Political Science Review 2 (1999): 115 44.

PAGE 475

475 George, Alexander. "The Case for Multiple Advocacy in Making Foreign Policy." American Political Science Review 66 (1972): 751 85. George, Alexander, and Andrew Bennett. Case Studies and Theory Development in the Social Sciences Bcsia Studies in International Security. Cam bridge, Mass.: MIT Press, 2005. Gillespie, Charles Guy Negotiating Democracy: Politicians and Generals in Uruguay Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1992. Glaser, Barney. G and Anselm L. Strauss. The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qual itative Research New York: Aldine Publishing Company, 1967. Graham, Carol. "Building Support for Market Reforms in Bolivia: The Capitalization and Popular Participation Programs." In The Deepening of Market Based Reform: ed ited by Latin American Program Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars. Washington, DC 1997. "Peru's Apra Party in Power: Impossible Revolution, Relinquished Reform." Journal of Interamerican Studies and World Affairs 32, no. 3 (1990): 75 115 Greenberg, Stanley B. Dispatches from the War Room : In the Trenches with Five Extraordinary Leaders 1st ed. New York: Thomas Dunne Books/St. Martin's Press, 2009. Greenstein. "The Leadership Style of George W. Bush." In The Bush Presidency: An Early As sessment Woodrow Wilson School, Princeton University, 2003. Greenstein, Fred I. The Hidden Hand Presidency : Eisenhower as Leader New York: Basic Books, 1982. Personality and Politics : Problems of Evidence, Inference, and Conceptualization New Y ork: Norton, 1975. Personality and Politics : Problems of Evidence, Inference, and Conceptualization : With a New Preface Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 1987. Grindle, Merilee Serrill. Audacious Reforms : Institutional Invention and Dem ocracy in Latin America Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 2000. Grindle, Merilee Serrill, and Pilar Domingo. Proclaiming Revolution : Bolivia in Comparative Perspective David Rockefeller Center Series on Latin American Studies, Harvard Universit y 10. London Cambridge, Mass.: Institute of Latin American Studies; David Rockefeller Center for Latin American Studies, Harvard University, 2003.

PAGE 476

476 Griner, Steven "Term Limits Can Check Corruption and Promote Political Accountability." Americas Quarterly no Spring (2009). Guthrie, Jason. "Enrique Snchez De Lozada, the Andean Indian Program, and Teh Rockefeller Archive Center (Rac): A Report on Research at the Archives." 8. Baltimore: University of Maryland, 2009. Haggard, Stephan, and Mathew D. McCubbins. Presidents, Parliaments, and Policy Political Economy of Institutions and Decisions. Cambridge, UK New York: Cambridge University Press, 2001. Haggard, Stephan, Mathew D. McCubbins, and Matthew Soberg Shugart. "Policymaking in Presidential Systems." In Pr esidents, Parliaments, and Policy edited by Stephan Haggard and Mathew D. McCubbins, xv, 359 p. Cambridge, UK New York: Cambridge University Press, 2001. Hagopian, Frances, and Scott Mainwaring, eds. The Third Wave of Democratization in Latin America : Ad vances and Setbacks Cambridge ; New York: Cambridge University Press, 2005. "Halcones Y Palomas." Caretas 1928 June 8 2006. Hartlyn, Jonathan. The Struggle for Democratic Politics in the Dominican Republic H. Eugene and Lillian Youngs Lehman Series. Chap el Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 1998. Hartlyn, Jonathan and Rosario Espinal. "Dominican Republic: The Long and Difficult Struggle for Democracy." In Democracy in Developing Countries: Latin America edited by Larry Jay Diamond, Juan J. Linz and Seymour Martin Lipset, 469 517. Boulder, Colo. London: L. Rienner; Adamantine Press, 1988. Hartlyn, Jonathan, and Rosario Espinal. "The Presidential Election in the Dominican Republic, May 2008." Electoral Studies 29 (2009): 322 45. Hermann, Margaret G. "Assessing Leadership Style: A Trait Analysis In The Psychological Assessment of Political Leaders edited by Jerrold D. Post. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 2003. "Exploring Foreign Policy Behavior Using the Personal Characteristics of Leaders." International Studies Quarterly 24, no. 1 (2001): 7 46. "Sadam Hussein's Leadership Style." In The Psychological Assessment of Political Leaders edited by Jerrold D. Post. Ann Arbor: Michigan University Press, 2003. "William Jeffers on Clinton's Leadership Style." In The Psychological Assessment of Political Leaders edited by Jerrold D. Post. Ann Arbor: Michigan University Press, 2003.

PAGE 477

477 Hermann, Margaret G., and Charles W. Kegley. "The Political Psychology of Peace through Democratiz ation." Cooperation and Conflict 30 (1995): 5 30. Hermann, Margaret G., and Thomas Preston. "Presidents, Advisers, and Foreign Policy: The Effect of Leadership Style on Executive Arrangements." Political Psychology 15, no. 1 (1994): 75 96. Hermann, Margar et G., Thomas Preston, Baghat Korany, and Timothy M. Shaw. "Who Leads Matters: The Effects of Powerful Individuals." International Studies Review 3, no. 2 (2001): 83 131. Higley, John, and Richard Gunther. Elites and Democratic Consolidation in Latin Ameri ca and Southern Europe Cambridge; New York: Cambridge University Press, 1992. "Historica Ley De Regionalizacion Promulgo Ayer Alan Garca." El Peruano March 20 1987. Hochstetler, Kathryn. "Rethinking Presidentialism: Challenges and Presidential Falls in South America." Comparative Politics 38, no. 4 (2006): 401 18. Hochstetler, Kathryn, and Margaret E. Edwards. "Failed Presidencies: Identifying and Explaining a South American Anomaly." Journal of Politics in Latin American 1, no. 2 (2009): 31 57. Hochste tler, Kathryn, and David Samuels. "Crisis and Rapid Reequilibration: The Consequences of Presidential Challenge and Failure in Latin America." Comparative Politics 43, no. 2 (2011): 127 45. House, Spangler, and Waoycke. "Personality and Charisma in the U.S Presidency: A Psychological Theoryof Leader Effectiveness." Administrative Science Quarterly 36 (1991): 364 96. Howell, W. G. "Unilateral Powers: A Brief Overview." Presidential Studies Quarterly 35 (2005): 417 39. Howell, William G. Power without Pers uasion : The Politics of Direct Presidential Action Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 2003. Hoyt, Katherine The Many Faces of Sandinista Democracy Athens: Ohio University Press, 1997. Huntington, Samuel P. Political Order in Changing Societies New Haven,: Yale University Press, 1968. The Third Wave : Democratization in the Late Twentieth Century Norman: University of Oklahoma Press, 1991.

PAGE 478

478 Who Are We? : The Challenges to America's National Identity New York: Simon & Schuster, 2004. Ingall, Rachael, and Brian Crisp. "Determinants of Home Style: The Many Incentives for Going Home in Colombia." Legislative Studies Quarterly 26, no. 3 (2001). JCE, Junta Central Electoral Resultados Elecciones Santo Domingo, Republica Dominicana: JCE, 1978 2010. Jimenez Polanco, Jacqueline. "El Nuevo Liderazgo Poltico En La Repblica Dominicana: Del Liderazgo Carismtico Al Liderazgo Contingente." Nueva Epoca 7 (1999): 153 93. "Los Partidos Politicos En El Autoritarismo Y En La Transicion Democra tica En La Republica Dominicana." Universidad Complutense de Madrid, 1993. Jimenez Polanco, Jacqueline. Los Partidos Politicos En La Republica Dominicana: Actividad Electoral Y Desarrollo Organizativo Santo Domingo: Editora Centenario, 1999. Jones, Ch arles. "The American Presidency: A Separationist Perspective." In Presidential Institutions and Democratic Politics : Comparing Regional and National Contexts edited by Kurt von Mettenheim. Baltimore, MD: The Johns Hopkins University Press, 1997. Kampwirt h, K. "Abortion, Antifeminism, and the Return of Daniel Ortega: In Nicaragua, Leftist Politics?" Latin American Perspectives 35, no. 122 (2008): 122 36. Karboo, J., and Margaret G. Hermann. "Leadership Styles of Prime Ministers: How Individual Differences Affect the Foreign Policymaking Process." Leadership Quarterly 9 (1998): 243 63. Karl, Terry Lynn. "The Hibrid Regimes of Central America." Journal of Democracy 6, no. 3 (1995): 72 86. "Imposing Consent: Electoralism Vs. Democratization in El Salvador ." In Elections and Democratization in Latin America, 1980 1985 edited by Paul W. Drake, Eduardo Silva and Kevin J. Middlebrook, xi, 335 p. San Diego: Center for Iberian and Latin American Studies, University of California, San Diego, 1986. Karl, Terry Ly nn, and Philippe C. Schmitter. "Modes of Transition in Latin American, Southern and Eastern Europe." International Social Science Journal 43, no. 2 (1991): 269 84. Keefer, Philip E. "The Political Economy of Public Spending Decisions in the Dominican Repub lic: Credibility, Clientelism and Political Institutions." In World Bank 25. Washington, DC, 2002.

PAGE 479

479 Keefer, Philip E., Thorsten Beck, George R. Clarke, Alberto Groff, and Patrick Walsh. "New Tools in Comparative Political Economy: The Database of Political Institutions." World Bank Economic Review 15, no. 1 (2001): 165 76. Keefer, Philip, and Razvan Vlaicu. "Democracy, Credibility and Clientelism." In Policy Research Working Paper Washington.: World Bank, 2005. Kenney, Charles. "The Death and Rebirth of a Party System, Peru 1978 2001." Comparative Political Studies 36, no. December (2003): 1210 39. Kenney, Charles Fujimori's Coup and the Breakdown of Democracy in Latin America Edited by Helen Kellogg Institute for International Studies. Notre Dame, Ind.: U niversity of Notre Dame Press, 2004. Keohane, Nannerl. "On Leadership." Perspectives on Politics 3, no. 4 (2005). Keohane, Nannerl O. Thinking About Leadership Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2010. Kernell, Samuel. Going Public: New Strategies of P residential Leadership 3rd ed. Washington, D.C.: Congressional Quarterly Press, 1997. Key, V. O., and Alexander Heard. Southern Politics in State and Nation New ed. Knoxville: University of Tennessee Press, 1949 [1984]. Key, V.O., Jr. The Responsible Ele ctorate Cambridge: Belknap, 1966. King, Gary, Robert O. Keohane, and Sidney Verba. Designing Social Inquiry : Scientific Inference in Qualitative Research Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 1994. Kitschelt, Herbert. "Linkages between Citizens a nd Politicans in Democratic Politics ). ." Comparative Political Studies 33, no. 6/7 (2000): 845 79. Klaren, Peter. "Historical Setting." In Peru : A Country Study edited by Rex A. Hudson, lvi, 422 p. Washington, D.C.: Library of Congress. Federal Researc h Division, 1993. Kramnick, Isaac. The Federalist Papers Penguin Classics. Harmondsworth, Middlesex, England New York: Penguin Books ; Viking Penguin, 1987. Kryzanek, Michael J. "The Dominican Republic: The Challenge of Preserving a Fragile Democracy." In Latin American Politics and Development edited by Howard J. Wiarda and Harvey F. Kline. Boulder, CO: Westview Press, 1996. Kryzanek, Michael J., and Howard Wiarda. The Politics of External Influence in the Dominican Republic New York Praeger Publishers, 1988.

PAGE 480

480 "La Subversion Se Extiende Como Una Mancha De Aceite. Alto Mando Militar Declara Para Efe". La Republica June 18 1985, 2. Laitin, David D. "Comparative Politics: The State of the Subdiscipline." In Political Science : The State of the Discipline ed ited by Ira Katznelson and Helen V. Milner, 630 59. New York, Washington, D.C.: Norton; American Political Science Association, 2002. "Larco Cox Presidente Del Consejo De Ministros." El Peruano June 27 1987. Laserna, Roberto. "Bolivia: Entre Populismo Y D emocracia." Nueva Sociedad 88, no. November/December (2003). Lazarte, Jorge. Bolivia: Certezas E Incertidumbres De La Democracia Vol. I. La Paz: Los Amigos del Libro ILDIS, 1993. Lazarte, Jorge R. Entre Dos Mundos: La Cultura Politica Y Democratica En Bol ivia La Paz: Plural 2000. Lehman, Kenneth. "A "Medicine of Death"? U.S. Policy and Political Disarray in Bolivia, 1985 2006." In Addicted to Failure: U.S. Security Policy in Latin America and the Andes edited by Brian Loveman. Plymouth, UK: Rowman & Lit tlefield Publishrs, 2006. Levi, Margaret. "Why We Need a New Theory of Government." Perspectives on Politics 4, no. 1 (2006): 5 19. Levinson, Brian "Ousted Bolivian President Speaks Out." University Wire The Hoya Georgetown University October 31 2003. L evitsky, Steven. "A Surprising Left Turn." Journal of Democracy 22, no. 4 (2011): 84 94. Levitsky, Steven "Fujimori and Post Party Politics in Peru." Journal of Democracy 10, no. 3 (1999): 78 92. Levitsky, Steven, and Maxwell A. Cameron. "Democracy withou t Parties? Political Latin American Politics and Society 45, no. September (2003): 1 33. Levitsky, Steven, and Mara Victoria Murillo. "Argentina: From Kirshner to Kirshner." Journal of Democracy 19, no. 2 (20 08): 16 30. Levitsky, Steven, and Lucan Way. Competitive Authoritarianism : Hybrid Regimes after the Cold War Problems of International Politics. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2010.

PAGE 481

481 Levitsky, Steven, and Lucan A. Way. "Competitive Authoritarianism : Origins and Evolution of Hybrid Regimes in the Post Cold War Era." In Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association 51 65, 2006. "The Rise of Competitive Authoritarianism." Journal of Democracy 13, no. 2 (2002): 51 65. Lieberman, Rob ert. "Ideas, Institutions, and Political Order: Explaining Political Order American Political Science Review 96 no. 4 (2002): 697 712. Lijphart, Arend. "Parliamentary Versus Presidential Government: Introduction In Parliamentary Versus Presidential Gov ernment edited by Arend Lijphart, 1 27. Oxford ; New York: Oxford University Press, 1992. Linz, Juan. "The Perils of Presidentialism." In Parliamentary Versus Presidential Government edited by Arend Lijphart, 118 27. New York: Oxford University Press, 19 92. "The Perils of Presidentialism Journal of Democracy 1, no. 1 (1990): 51 69. "The Virtues of Parliamentarism In Parliamentary Versus Presidential Government edited by Arend Lijphart, 212 16. Oxford ; New York: Oxford University Press, 199 2. Linz, Juan and Arturo Valenzuela. The Failure of Presidential Democracy: Comparative Perspectives & the Case of Latin America Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1994. Linz, Juan J., and Alfred C. Stepan. The Breakdown of Democratic Regimes B altimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1978. Linz, Juan, and Alfred Stepan. Problems of Democratic Transition and Consolidation Baltimore and London: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1996. Lipset, Seymour Martin. The First New Nation : The United States in Historical and Comparative Perspective 2000 ed. New Brunswick, N.J.: Transaction Publishers, 1978. Llanos, Mariana, and Ana Margheritis. "Liderazgo Presidencial Y Dinamica Institutional Durante El Primer Periodo Presidencial De Menem. El Caso De Las Pr ivatizaciones." Politica y Gobierno VI, no. 2 (1999): 441 75. "Why Do Presidents Fail? Political Leadership and the Argentine Crisis (1999 2001)." Studies in Comparative International Development 40, no. 4 (2006): 77 103. no,El Mismo Equipo De Hace 10 Aos." El Barahonero Agust 22 2010.

PAGE 482

482 "Los Cambios Que Se Vienen." Caretas 925 Ocotber 13 1986. "Los Precandidatos." Caretas 936 December 29 1986. "Los Que Se Van...Y Los Que Se Quedan." Caretas 912 July 7 1986. Lozada, Blit hz, and Marco Antonio Saavedra. Democracia, Pactos Y Elites: Genealogia De La Gobernabilidad En El Neoliberalismo Primera ed. La Paz: Instituto de Investigaciones de Ciencia Politica, 1998. Lozano, Wilfredo. Despues De Los Caudillos Edited by FLACSO. Sant on Domingo Libreria La Trinitaria, 2002. Maccoby, Michael. The Productive Narcissist: The Promise and Peril of Visionary Leadership New York: Broadway Books, 2003. Machiavelli, Niccol o, Peter E. Bondanella, and Mark Musa. The Portable Machiavelli The Vi king Portable Library. Harmondsworth, Eng. ; New York: Penguin Books, 1979. Madrid, Raul "Ethnic Cleavages and Electoral Volatility in Latin America." Comparative Politics 38, no. 1 (2005): 1 20. Mahoney, James. "Knowledge Accumulation in Comparative Histo rical Research: The Case of Democracy and Authoritarianism In Comparative Historical Analysis in the Social Sciences edited by James Mahoney and Dietrich Rueschemeyer, xix, 444 p. Cambridge, U.K. ; New York: Cambridge University Press, 2003. "Strat egies of Causal Assessment in Comparative Historical Analysis." In Comparative Historical Analysis in the Social Sciences edited by James Mahoney and Dietrich Rueschemeyer, xix, 444 p. Cambridge, U.K. ; New York: Cambridge University Press, 2003. Mainwari ng, Scott. "Presidentialism in Latin America." In Parliamentary Versus Presidential Government edited by Arend Lijphart. Oxford ; New York: Oxford University Press, 1992. Mainwaring, Scott and Timothy R. Scully. "Democratic Governance in Latin America: Eleven Lessons from Recent Experience Journal of Democracy 19, no. 3 (2008): 113 27. Mainwaring, Scott, Guillermo A. O'Donnell, and J. Samuel Valenzuela. Issues in Democratic Consolidation : The New South American Democracies in Comparative Perspective Notre Dame, Ind.: Published for the Helen Kellogg Institute for International Studies by University of Notre Dame Press, 1992.

PAGE 483

483 Mainwaring, Scott, and Anibal Perez Linan. "Latin American Democratization since 1978: Democratic Transitions, Breakdowns and Er osions." In The Third Wave of Democratization in Latin America : Advances and Setbacks edited by Frances Hagopian and Scott Mainwaring, xviii, 413 p. Cambridge ; New York: Cambridge University Press, 2005. "Regime Legacies and Democratization: Explai ning Variance in the Level of Democracy in Latin America 1978 2004." 2008. Mainwaring, Scott, and Timothy Scully. Democratic Governance in Latin America Stanford, Calif.: Stanford University Press, 2010. Mainwaring, Scott, and Matthew Soberg Shugart. Pres identialism and Democracy in Latin America Cambridge Studies in Comparative Politics. Cambridge ; New York: Cambridge University Press, 1997. Malloy, James M. "Authoritarianism, Corporatism and Mobilization in Peru." The Review of Politics 36, no. 1 (1974 ): 52 84. "Democracy, Economic Crisis and the Problem of Governance: The Case of Bolivia." Comparative International Development 26, no. 2 (1991). Malloy, James M. and Eduardo A. Gamarra. "The Transition to Democracy in Bolivia." In Authoritarians a nd Democrats: Regime Transition in Latin America edited by James M. Malloy and Mitchell Seligson, 93 120. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburg Press, 1987. Malloy, James M., and Eduardo A. Gamarra. Revolution and Reaction: Bolivia 1965 1985 New Brunsw ick: Transaction Books, 1988. Mansbridge, Jane. "A Selection Model of Political Representation." Journal of Political Philosophy 17, no. 4 (2009): 369 98. Mansfield, Harvey Claflin. Taming the Prince: The Ambivalence of Modern Executive Power Johns Hopkin s paperbacks ed. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1993. Mansilla, H. C. F. "La Mentalidad Tradicional Como Obstaculo a La Democratizacion En El Caso Boliviano: Factores Historicos Y Culturales En Los Procesos De Modernizacion Revista de Estudio s Politicos Nueva Epoca 118 (2002). Mansilla, H.C.F. "La Percepcin Ciudadana Con Respecto a La Poltica Y a Los Partidos Polticos En Bolivia." Mundo Nuevo IAEAL USB 92 93 no. Julio Diciembre (2002). "Mar a Fondo: Tren Electrico." Caretas 1180 19 98. "Mar De Fondo. Entusiasta Proposicion." Caretas 930 March 30 1986.

PAGE 484

484 Marshall, Monty G., and Research Societal Systems Inc. "Political Regime Characteristics and Transitions, 1800 2010." edited by Polity IV Project: Center for Systemic Peace, 2011. Marst eintredet, Leiv. "Political Institutions and Their Effect on Democracy in the Dominican Republic: A Critical Assessment." The University of Bergen, 2004. "Rendicin De Cuentas Horizontal Y Preponderancia Presidencial: Una Combinacin Difcil. El Caso De Repblica Dominicana, 1967 2009." Amrica Latina Hoy 56 (2010): 85 109. Marsteintredet, Leiv "Presidential Interruptions in Latin America: Concepts, Causes, and Outcomes." University of Bergen, 2009. Martinez Barahona, Elena. "Las Cortes Supremas Como M ecanismo De Distribucin De Poder: El Caso De La Reeleccin Presidencial En Costa Rica Y Nicaragua." Revista de Ciencia Poltica 30, no. 3 (2010): 723 50. Martinez, Sebastian. "Pensions, Poverty and Household Investments in Bolivia." 49. Berkeley 2004. M ayhew, David R. Divided We Govern: Party Control, Lawmaking, and Investigations, 1946 1990 New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1991. Mayorga, Fernando. Avatares: Ensayos Sobre Poltica Y Sociedad En Bolivia La Paz CESU UMSS, 2003. "Neopopulismo Y D emocracia En Bolivia." Revista de Ciencia Poltica 23, no. 3 (2003): 99 118. Neopopulismo Y Democracia: Compadres Y Padrinos En La Poltica Boliviana La Paz Ed. Cesu, Ceplag y Plurales, 2002. Mayorga, Fernando "Elecciones En Bolivia: Lo Nuevo Y Lo Vi ejo." Anuario Social y Poltico de Amrica Latina y el Caribe. Flacso /Unesco / Nueva Sociedad 6 (2003): 9 17. Mayorga, Rene Antonio. "Bolivia's Silent Revolution Journal of Democracy 8, no. 1 (1997): 142 56. McClintock, Cynthia. Peru: Precarious Regimes Authoritarian and Democratic Edited by Larry Jay Diamond, Juan J. Linz and Seymour Martin Lipset. 2nd. ed, Democracy in Developing Countries: Latin America. Boulder, Colo. London: L. Rienner ; Adamantine Press, 1999. McClintock, Cynthia "Plurality Versu s Runoff Rules for the Election of the President in Latin America: Implications for Democracy." In APSA Chicago, 2007.

PAGE 485

485 "The Prospects for Democratic Consolidation in A "Least Likely" Case: Peru." Comparative Politics 21, no. 2 (1989): 127 48. "A n Unlikely Comeback in Peru." Journal of Democracy 17, no. 4 (2006): 95 109. McClintock, Cynthia, and Abraham F. Lowenthal. The Peruvian Experiment Reconsidered Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 1983. McCoy, Jennifer. "Chavez and the End Of "Pa rtyarchy" In Venezuela." Journal of Democracy 10, no. 3 (1999): 64 77. Political Learning and Redemocratization in Latin America : Do Politicians Learn from Political Crises? Coral Gables, Fla. Boulder, CO: North South Center Press 2000. Merolla, Jenn ifer L. Jennifer M. Ramos, and Elizabeth J. Zechmeister. "Crisis, Charisma, and Consequences: Evidence from the 2004 U.S. Presidential Election." Journal of Politics 69, no. 1 (2007): 30 42. Mesa G, Carlos D. Presidencia Sitiada: Memorias De Mi Gobiern o La Paz Plural Editores 2008. Mettenheim, Kurt von. Presidential Institutions and Democratic Politics : Comparing Regional and National Contexts Baltimore, MD: The Johns Hopkins University Press, 1997. Fact." Harvard Business Review no. March/April (1990): 163 76. Mitchell, Kenneth. "Democratization, External Exposure and State Food Distribution in the Dominican Republic." Bulletin of Latin American Research 28, no. 2 (2009): 204 26. Molina, Sergio. "I Have Not Changed; Interview with Gonzalo Snchez De Lozada." La Prensa August 1 1999. Montaner, Carlos Alberto. Latin Americans and the West Miami: InterAmerican Institute for Democracy, 2009. Morell, Kevin and Jean Hartley. "A Model of Political Lead ership." Human Relations 59, no. 4 (2006): 483 504. Morgan, Jana, and Rosario Espinal. "Cultura Poltica De La Democracia En La Repblica Dominicana, 2008: El Impacto De Gobernabilidad." Nashville: U.S. Agency for International Development, 2009.

PAGE 486

486 Morgan, J ana, Jonathan Hartlyn, and Rosario Espinal. "Dominican Party System Continuity Amid Regional Transformations: Economic Policy, Clientelism, and Migration Flows." Latin American Politics and Society 53, no. 1 (2011). Morn, Eduardo and Cynthia Sanborn. L os Desafos Del Policymaking En El Per: Actores, Instituciones Y Reglas De Juego Vol. Documento de Trabajo 77 Universidad del Pacifico. Lima: Centro de Investigacion de la Universidad del Pacifico (CIUP), 2007. Moya Pons, Frank. Dominican History: A Nati onal History Third Edition, updated and expanded ed. Princeton: Markus Wiener Publishers, 2010. The Dominican Republic : A National History 3rd updated and expanded ed. Princeton, N.J.: Markus Wiener Publishers, 2010. El Siglo Xx Dominicano : E conoma, Poltica, Pensamiento Y Literatura Coleccin Popular Codetel ; V. 2. Santo Domingo, Repblica Dominicana: CODETEL, 2002. Moya Pons, Frank "Antihaitianismo De Estado." Diario Libre December 8th 2009. "Fraude Electoral, 1994." Diario Libre M ay 22 2010. Munck, Gerardo. "Democratic Politics in Latin America: New Debates and Research Frontiers." Annual Review of Political Science 7 (2004): 437 62. Munck, Gerardo Regimes and Democracy in Latin America : Theories and Methods New York: Oxford Univ ersity Press, 2007. Murillo, Mara Victoria, Virginia Oliveros, and Milan Vaishnav. "Economic Constraints and Presidential Agency." In The Resurgence of the Latin American Left edited by Steven Levitsky and Kenneth M. Roberts. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkin s University Press, 2011. Nathan, Andrew J. "Authoritarian Resilience." Journal of Democracy 14, no. 1 (2003): 6 17. Navia, Patricio "Limit the Power of Presidents, Not Their Term in Office." Americas Quarterly no. Spring (2009). Negretto, Gabriel L. "Mi nority Presidents and Democratic Performance in Latin America." Latin American Politics and Society 48, no. 3 (2006). Neustadt, Richard E. Presidential Power and the Modern Presidents: The Politics of Leadership from Roosevelt to Reagan New York: Free Pre ss, 1990. Presidential Power, the Politics of Leadership New York,: Wiley, 1960.

PAGE 487

487 Nichols, Curt, and Adam Myers. "Exploiting the Opportunity for Reconstructive Leadership: Presidential Responses to Enervated Political Regimes." American Politics Resea rch 38, no. 5 (2010): 806 41. "Noches (Y Dias) De Ronda." Caretas 948 March 30 1987. Nogales, Xavier. "Perspectivas De La Economa Boliviana 2001 2005." (2001). "Nota De Rajiv Gandhi Para Alan Garca." El Peruano September 4 1986. O'Donnell, Guillermo A. "Delegative Democracy." Journal of Democracy 5, no. 1 (1994): 55 69. "Horizontal Accountability in New Democracies." In Self Restraining State: Power and Accountability in New Democracies edited by Andreas Schedler, Larry Diamond and Marc F. Plattne r, 29 51: Boulder: Lynne Reinner, 1999. "Illusions About Consolidation Journal of Democracy 7, no. 2 (1996): 34 51. "In Partial Defense of an Evanescent "Paradigm"." Journal of Democracy 13, no. 3 (2002). Modernization and Bureaucratic Aut horitarianism; Studies in South American Politics Politics of Modernization Series, No. 9. Berkeley,: Institute of International Studies University of California, 1973. "Transitions, Continuities and Paradoxes." In Issues in Democratic Consolidation : The New South American Democracies in Comparative Perspective edited by Scott Mainwaring, Guillermo A. O'Donnell and J. Samuel Valenzuela, vii, 357 p. Notre Dame, Ind.: Published for the Helen Kellogg Institute for International Studies by University of Notre Dame Press, 1992. O'Donnell, Guillermo A., and Philippe C. Schmitter. Transitions from Authoritarian Rule. Conclusions About Uncertain Democracies Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1986. O'Donnell, Guillermo A., Philippe C. Schmitter, Laur ence Whitehead, and Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars. Latin American Program. Transitions from Authoritarian Rule. Latin America Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1986. O'Neill, Kathleen "Decentralization as an Electoral Strategy Comparative Political Studies 36: (2003): 983 1006. Odendahl, Teresa, and Aileen M. Shaw. "Interviewing Elites." In Handbook of Interview Research: Context & Method edited by Jaber F. Gubrium and James A. Holstein, xiii, 981 p. Thousand Oaks, Calif.: Sa ge Publications, 2002.

PAGE 488

488 ONPE, Oficina Nacional de Procesos Electorales "Los Procesos Electorales En El Per: 1978 1986 Problemas Y Lecciones." In Documento de Trabajo 11 edited by ONPE CIE: Oficina Nacional de Procesos Electorales, 2005. "Resultado s Electorales." edited by ONPE. Lima Oficina Nacional de Procesos Electorales, 1980 2011. "Palabras Del Presidente Alan Garca En La Reunion De Vivienda Y Construccion Civil En Palacio De Gobierno." El Peruano February 20 1986. Panizza, Francisco. "A Refo rm without Losers: The Symbolic Economy of Civil Service Reform in Uruguay 1995 96." Latin American politics and society 46, no. 3 (2004): 1 28. Pappas, Takis S. "Political Leadership and the Emergence of Radical Mass Movements in Democracy." Comparative P olitical Studies 41, no. 8 (2008). Payne, J. Mark. "Balancing Executive and Legislative Prerogatives: The Role of Constitutional and Party Based Factors." In Democracies in Development : Politics and Reform in Latin America edited by J. Mark Payne, Daniel Zovatto G. and Mercedes Mateo Daz. Washington, DC: Inter American Development Bank and International Institute for Democracy and Electoral Assistance, 2007. Payne, J. Mark, and Andres Allamand Zavala. "The Effects of Presidential Election Systems on D emocratic Governability." In Democracies in Development : Politics and Reform in Latin America edited by J. Mark Payne, Daniel Zovatto G. and Mercedes Mateo Daz. Washington, DC: Inter American Development Bank and International Institute for Democracy and Electoral Assistance, 2007. Peabody, Robert L., Susan Webb Hammond, Jean Torcom, Lynne P. Brown, Carolyn Thompson, and Robin Kolodny. "Interviewing Political Elites." PS: Political Science & Politics 23, no. 3 (1990): 451 55. Pearson, Sidney A. "Pres idential Leadership Society 43, no. 3 (2006). Penfold, Michael. "Re Election in the Andes: Politics and Prospects." In Working Paper Washington, DC Inter American Dialogue, 2010. Peterson, Mark "The Presidency and Organized Interests: White House Patter ns of Interest Group Liason." American Political Science Review 86, no. September (1992): 612 25. Piaggio, Gino. "La Pesadilla De Todo Ministro." El Comercio July 28 2009. Pierson, Paul. Politics in Time: History, Institutions and Social Analysis Princet on: Princeton University Press, 2004.

PAGE 489

489 Pierson, Paul "Big, Slow Moving, And...Invisible: Macrosocial Processes in the Study of Comparative Politics." In Comparative Historical Analysis in the Social Sciences edited by James Mahoney and Dietrich Rueschemeye r, xix, 444 p. Cambridge, U.K. ; New York: Cambridge University Press, 2003. Pierson, Paul D., and Theda Skocpol. "Historical Institutionalism in Contemporary Political Science." In Political Science : The State of the Discipline edited by Ira Katznelson and Helen V. Milner. New York, Washington, D.C.: Norton; American Political Science Association, 2002. Post, Jerrold D. "Assessing Leaders at the Distance: The Political Personality Profile." In The Psychological Assessment of Political Leaders edited b y Jerrold D. Post. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 2003. Post, Jerrold M. ""El Fenomeno Chavez": Hugo Chavez of Venezuela, Modern Day Bolivar." Maxwell Air Force Base, Alabama, 2007. "Presidente Garca Anuncia Dura Batalla." El Peruano Noviemb re 27 1989. Przeworski, Adam. Democracy and the Market : Political and Economic Reforms in Eastern Europe and Latin America Studies in Rationality and Social Change. Cambridge ; New York: Cambridge University Press, 1991. Przeworski, Adam, Michael A. Alva rez, Jose Antonio Cheibub, and Fernando Limongi. Democracy and Development : Political Institutions and Well Being in the World, 1950 1990 Cambridge Studies in the Theory of Democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000. Przeworski, Adam, Susan C arol Stokes, and Bernard Manin. Democracy, Accountability, and Representation Cambridge Studies in the Theory of Democracy. Cambridge, U.K. ; New York: Cambridge University Press, 1999. Pueblo, Defensora del. "Informe Anual Al Congreso Nacional." La Paz Defensoria del Pueblo de Bolivia, 2004. Pugh, Tony. Knight ridder newspapers "Bolivia Change Resisted by U.S. No Congratulations for New President." Pittsburgh Post Gazette October 19 2003, A 8. Ragin, Charles C. "Turning the Tables: How Case Oriented Res earch Challenges Variable Oriented Research." In Rethinking Social Inquiry: Diverse Tools, Shared Standards edited by Henry E. Brady and David Collier, xx, 362 p. Lanham, Md.: Rowman & Littlefield, 2004. "Remueven a 8 Jefes Pip De La Division De Narcotico s. Otras 10 Casas De Cambios Pertenecen a Policias". La Republica August 4 1985, 19 "Resolucion Suprema N. 0065 85 In." El Peruano September 19 1985, 38614.

PAGE 490

490 "Resolucion Suprema N. 0068 85 In." El Peruano October 29 1985, 39443. "Resolucion Suprema N. 0 077 85 in/Dm." El Peruano November 30 1985, 40232. "Resolucion Suprema No. 0065 86 in, 0068 85 in/Dm, 0077 85 in/Dm, 0073 85 in/Dm, 0074 85 in/Dm, 0008 86 in Dm, 0009 86 in/Dm, 0010 86 in/Dm, 0019 86 in/Dm, 0036 86 in/Dm." El Peruano September 1985 May 1986 1985 1986. "Resolucion Suprema No. 389 85 Ef, 105 82 Efc, 106 82 Efc, 308 82 Efc, 601 83 Efc, 303 85 Ef." El Peruano August 1985 July 1986 1986. Reyna, Carlos. La Anunciacin De Fujimori : Alan Garca, 1985 1990 Lima: DESCO, 2000. Riding, Alan "Pa ct on Peru's Debt Not Expected Soon." The New York Times Dec 25, 1984 1984. "Tensions Continue for Peru's Leader." The New York Times April 12 1987. Roca, Jos Luis "Regionalism Revisited." In Unresolved Tensions : Bolivia Past and Present edited b y John Crabtree and Laurence Whitehead, ix, 309 p. Pittsburgh, Pa.: University of Pittsburgh Press, 2008. Rockman, Bert The Leadership Question New York: Praeger, 1984. Rohter, Larry. "Bolivia's Poor Proclaim Abiding Distrust of Globalization The New Yo rk Times Ocotber 17th 2003, 3. "Bolivian Leader's Ouster Seen as Warning on U.S. Drug Policy The New York Times October 23 2003, Foreign Desk. p.1. Rohter, Larry "Bolivian President Remains Defiant as Protests Intensify The New York Times Octobe r 14, 2003 2003, 3. Rojas, Cesar. Democracia De Alta Tension Edited by Plural Editores. La Paz, 2007. Romero Ballivin, Salvador. "C ONDEPA y U CS : El Declive Del Neopopulismo Boliviano." Revista de Ciencia Poltica 23, no. 1 (2003): 67 98. Rose, Richa rd, William Mishler, and Christian W. Haerpfer. Democracy and Its Alternatives: Understanding Post Communist Societies. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1998. Rosner, Jeremy D. and Mark Feierstein. "Hindering Reform in Latin America." The Wa shington Post August 6 2002, A15.

PAGE 491

491 Rother, Larry "Dominican Republic Holds Runoff, Capping Fierce Race." New York Times July1 1996. Rubin, Herbert J., and Irene S. Rubin. Qualitative Interviewing: The Art of Hearing Data Thousand Oaks: Sage, 1995. Rubio, Marcial. "La Crisis De La Izquierda En El Peru Nueva Sociedad no. 61 (1982): 81 86. Sachs, Jeffrey. "Call It Our Bolivian Policy of Not So Benign Neglect." Washington Post October 26 2003, B02. Snchez, Peter. "The Dominican Case." In Elites and Democra tic Consolidation in Latin America and Southern Europe edited by John Higley and Richard Gunther, xiv, 354 p. Cambridge ; New York: Cambridge University Press, 1992. Schattschneider, E.E. The Semisoverign People; a Realist View of Democracy in America 1s t ed. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston, 1960. Seligson, Michael A. La Cultura Politica De La Democracia En Bolivia: 2000 La Paz, Bolivia Universidad Catolica Boliviana, 2001. Seligson, Mitchell A. Auditoria De La Democracia: Bolivia 2002 La Paz, Boliv ia: Universidad Catolica Boliviana, 2003. Seligson, Mitchell A., and John A. Booth. "Political Culture and Regime Type: Evidence from Nicaragua and Costa Rica." Journal of Politics 55, no. 3 (1993): 777 92. Sen, Amartya. Identity and Violence : The Illusi on of Destiny 1st ed. New York: W. W. Norton & Co., 2006. Shapiro, Ian "The State of Democratic Theory." In Political Science: State of the Discipline edited by Ira Katznelson and Helen V. Milner: American Political Science Association, 2002. Shifter, Mic hael. "A Conversation with Alan Garca Interview with Michael Shifter." Washington Post June 4, 2006 2006, B02. Shugart, Matthew, and John Carey. Presidents and Assamblies: Constitutional Design and Electoral Dynamics Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 1992. Siavelis, Peter M. "Democracy and Political Institutions in Latin America: Reconciling Approaches." Latin America Research Review 39, no. 2 (2004): 275 90. Sims, Calvin "Bolivia's Chief Struggles to Fulfill Promise to Indians." The New York Times July 16, 1995 "Sin Marco Legal Para Obras." Hoy April 8th 2005.

PAGE 492

492 Skelley, Esther. "The Dominican Republic: A Winding Road to Democracy and Development." In Latin American Politics and Development edited by Howard J. Wiarda and Harvey F Kline, 534 New Yor k: Westview Press, 2007. Skocpol, Theda. States and Social Revolutions : A Comparative Analysis of France, Russia, and China Cambridge ; New York: Cambridge University Press, 1979. Skowronek, Stephen. "Leadership by Definition: First Term Reflections on G eorge W. Bush's Political Stance." Perspectives on Politics 3, no. 4 (2005): 817 31. "Order and Change Polity 28, no. 1 (1995): 91 96. The Politics Presidents Make: Leadership from John Adams to Bill Clinton. Cambridge: Belknap/Harvard Universi ty Press, 1993. "The Presidency : A New Undestanding Review of Politics 49, no. 3 (1987). "Presidential Leadership in Political Time." In The Presidency and the Political System edited by Michael Nelson. Washington, D.C: Congressional Quarterl y Press, 2000. Presidential Leadership in Political Time : Reprise and Reappraisal Lawrence, Kan.: University Press of Kansas, 2008. Slater, Dan. Ordering Power : Contentious Politics and Authoritarian Leviathans in Southeast Asia Cambridge Studies in Comparative Politics. Cambridge ; New York: Cambridge University Press, 2010. Journal of Democracy 19, no. 2 (2008). Sondrol, Paul. "Intellectuals, Political Culture and the Roots of the Authoritarian Presidency in Latin America." Governance 3, no. 4 (1990): 416 37. "The Presidentialist Tradition in Latin America." International Journal of Public Administration 28, no. 5/6 (2005): 517 30. Starke, Peter. "Anecdotal Evidence: The Role o f Narrative in Process Tracing." In APSA 2010 : SSRN, 2010. Stepan, Alfred, and Juan J. Linz. "Comparative Perpectives on Inequality and the Quality of Democracy in the United States." Perspectives on Politics 9, no. 4 (2011): 841 56. Stokes, Susan Carol. C ultures in Conflict : Social Movements and the State in Peru Berkeley: University of California Press, 1995.

PAGE 493

493 Mandates and Democracy: Neoliberalism by Surprise in Latin America Cambridge Studies in Comparative Politics. Cambridge ; New York: Cambridg e University Press, 2001. Stouthamer Loeber, Magda, and Welmoet Bok Van Kammen. Data Collection and Management: A Practical Guide Applied Social Research Methods Series ; V. 39. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications, 1995. Strm, Kaare. "A Behavioural Theory o f Competitive Political Parties American Journal of Political Science 34 (1990): 565 98. "Suprema Da Golpe Bajo a Fernndez ". El Nacional December 5 1997. Tanaka, Martn. "Crnica De Una Muerte Anunciada? Determinismo, Voluntarismo, Actores Y Poderes E structurales En El Per, 1980 2000." In Lecciones Del Final Del Fujimorismo edited by Jane Marcus Delgado and Martn Tanaka. Lima Instituto de Estudios Peruanos, 2001. "Democracia Sin Partidos: Per 2000 2005. ." In Los Problemas De Representacin Y Las Propuestas De Reforma Poltica edited by Instituto de Estudios Peruanos. Lima, 2005. Revista de Ciencia Poltica 28, no. 1 (2008): 347 65. Los Espejismos De La Democracia : El Colapso Del Sistema D e Partidos En El Per, 1980 1995, En Perspectiva Comparada 1. ed, Serie Ideologa Y Poltica 9. Lima, Peru: IEP, Instituto de Estudios Peruanos, 1998. "Los Estudios Polticos En Per: Ausencias, Desconexin De La Realidad Y La Necesidad De La Ciencia Poltica Como Disciplina." Revista de Ciencia Poltica 25, no. 1 (2005): 222 31. "Peru 1980 2000: Chronicle of a Death Foretold? Determinism, Political Decisions and Open Outcomes." In The Third Wave of Democratization in Latin America : Advances a nd Setbacks edited by Frances Hagopian and Scott Mainwaring. Cambridge ; New York: Cambridge University Press, 2005. "A Vote for Moderate Change." Journal of Democracy 22, no. 4 (2011): 75 83. Tanaka, Martn, and Yamile Guibert. "Entre La Evaporacion De Los Partidos Y La Debilidad De Los Movimientos Regionales." In Peru Debate edited by Departamento de Ciencias Sociales, 18 28. Lima Pontificia Universidad Catolica del Peru, 2011. Tanaka, Martn, and Sofia Vera. "Per: Entre Los Sobresaltos Electorale s Y La Agenda Pendiente De La Exclusin Revista de Ciencias Polticas 27, no. Edicion Especial, Santiago (2007).

PAGE 494

494 Tavera Hernandez, Juan. "Dictadura Y Democracia." Diario Libre 2010. Taylor, Lewis. "Politicians without Parties and Parties without Politici ans: The Foibles of the Peruvian Political Class, 2000 2006." Bulletin of Latin American Research 26, no. 1 (2007): 1 23. Thede, Nancy. "Democratic Agency in the Local Political Sphere. Reflections on Inclusion in Bolivia." Democratization 18, no. 1 (201 1): 211 35. Tilly, Charles. Democracy New York: Cambridge University Press, 2007. Toranzo, Carlos F. "Bolivia: Nuevo Escenario Politico." Nueva Sociedad 182 (2002): 12 20. "Partidos Politicos Y Think Tanks and Bolivia In Dime a Quien Escuchas; Part idos Politicos Y Think Tanks En America Latina edited by Enrique Mendizabal and Kristen Sampler, 59 96. Stockolm, Lima, London: IDEA, 2009. Torrico Teran, Mario "Qu Ocurri Realmente En Bolivia?" Perfiles Latinoamericanos 028, no. July December (2006). Tuesta Soldevilla, Fernando. Per Poltico En Cifras Tercera Ed. ed: Fundacin Friedrich Ebert, 2001. Sistema De Partidos Polticos En El Per, 1978 1995 1. ed. Lima: Fundacin Friedrich Ebert, 1995. UNDP. Democracy in Latin America: Toward a Citiz New York: : United Nations Development Programme, 2005. Van Cott, Donna Lee. "Bolivia: The Constuction of a Mutiethnic Democracy." In Latin American Politics and Development edited by Howard J. Wiarda and Harvey F Kline, 534 New York: Wes tview Press, 2007. The Friendly Liquidation of the Past: The Politics of Diversity in Latin America Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press, 2000. "From Exclusion to Inclusion: Bolivia's 2002 Elections." Journal of Latin American Studies 35 ( 2003): 751 75. Vargas Cullell, Jorge. "Costa Rica: An Strategic Decision in Uncertain Times." Revista de Ciencia Poltica 28, no. 1 (2008): 147 69. Vargas Llosa, Mario. El Pez En El Agua: Memorias Barcelona: Seix Barral., 1993. "Hacia El Peru Total itario." El Comercio August 2 1987. Vidal Rodriguez, Tomas. "Leonel Cumple Dcada Con El Mismo Equipo." El Nacional Agosto 21 2010.

PAGE 495

495 Villegas, Rene Reuters. "Bolivia's President Halts Controversial Gas Project; 15 Reported Killed as Violent Protests Spre ad." The Washington Post October 14 2003, A 16. Walker, S., and M. Schafer. "The Political Universe of Lyndon Johnson and His Advisors: Diagnostic and Strategic Propensities in Their Operational Codes." Political Psychology 21 (2000): 529 43. Warren, Caro l A.B. "Qualitative Interviewing." In Handbook of Interview Research: Context & Method edited by Jaber F. Gubrium and James A. Holstein, xiii, 981 p. Thousand Oaks, Calif.: Sage Publications, 2002. Wasserman, Noam "All in the Mind: A Different Breed of Ma nager." The Economist March 14 2009. Weaver, R. Kent and Bert A. Rockman. "Assessing the Effects of Institutions." In Do Institutions Matter? Government Capabilities in the United States and Abroad edited by R. Kent Weaver and Bert A. Rockman. Washingt on D.C.: The Brookings Institution, 1993. "When and How Do Institutions Matter?" In Do Institutions Matter? Government Capabilities in the United States and Abroad edited by R. Kent Weaver and Bert A. Rockman. Washington D.C.: The Brookings Instituti on, 1993. Webb, Richard. "Conozca El Peru El Comercio April 25 2005. "La Modernidad De La Pobreza." El Comercio August 2 2004. "Orden." El Comercio January 3 2005. Weber, Max "Politics as a Vocation." In Social Ethics Series edited by Frank lin Sherman. Philadelphia, PA: Fortress Press, 1965. Issues in International Political Economy Washington Center for Strategic and International Studies, 2006. Weitzman, Hal. Peru 'S Comeback King in the Spotlight Alan Garca Financial Times Monday, July 24, 2006 2006. Werlich, David P. "Fujimori and The "Disaster" In Peru Current History 90, no. 553 (1991): 61 64. Weyland, Kurt. "Critical Debates Neoliberalism and Democracy in Latin Amer ica: A Mixed Record." Latin American Politics & Society 46, no. 1 (2004): 135 57. "The Diffusion of Innovations: How Cognitive Heuristics Shaped Bolivia's Pension Reform." Comparative Politics 38, no. 1 (2005): 21 42.

PAGE 496

496 Whitehead, Laurence. "Bolivia's F ailed Democratization, 1977 1980." In Transitions from Authoritarian Rule: Latin America edited by Guillermo O'Donnell, Philippe Schmitter and Laurence Whitehead, xii, 244 p. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1986. "Bolivia and the Viabilit y of Democracy." Journal of Democracy 12, no. 2 (2001). "The Drama of Democratization." Journal of Democracy 10, no. 4 (1999): 84 98. "High Anxiety in the Andes: Bolivia and the Viability of Democracy." Journal of Democracy 12, no. 2 (2001): 6 16 Latin America: A New Interpretation Studies of the Americas. New York: Palgrave Mcmillan, 2010. Whitehead, Lawrence. "The Viability of Democracy: The Bolivian Experience." In Towards Democratic Viability edited by J. Crabtree and Laurence Whitehead. Hampshire Palgrave 2001. Wiarda, Howard J. "The Dilemmas of Democracy in the Dominican Republic: A Paradigm for All of Latin America?" In Assessing Democracy in Latin America edited by Philip Kelly, 185 95. Boulder: Westview Press, 1998. Wiarda, Howard J ., and Michael J. Kryzanek. The Dominican Republic, a Caribbean Crucible 2nd ed, Westview Profiles. Nations of Contemporary Latin America. Boulder: Westview Press, 1992. Williamson, John. "Democracy and the Washington Consensus." World Development 21, no. 8 (1993): 1329 993. "Did the Washington Consensus Fail." edited by Peterson Institute for International Economics. Washington, D.C., 2002. Willis, Eliza, Christopher Garman, and Stephan Haggard. "The Politics of Decentralization in Latin America." L atin American Research Review 34 (1999): 7 57. Willner, Ann Ruth. The Spellbinders: Charismatic Political Leadership New Haven: Yale University Press, 1984. Winter, David G. "Leader Appeal, Leader Performance, and the Motive Profiles of Leaders and Follow ers: A Study of American Presidents and Elections." Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 52 (1987): 196 202. "Measuring the Motives of Political Actors at a Distance." In The Psychological Assessment of Political Leaders edited by Jerrold D. Post, 153 77. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 2003.

PAGE 497

497 Winter, David G. Margaret G. Hermann, Walter Weintraub, and Walkerm Stephen G. "The Personalities of Bush and Gorbachev Measured at a Distance: Procedures, Portraits, and Policies." Political Psychology 12, no. 2 (1991): 215 45. Wiseman, John A. The New Struggle for Democracy in Africa Aldershot, Hants, England ; Brookfield, Vt., USA: Avebury, 1996. Wolff, Jonas. "Postliberal Democracy Emerging? A Conceptual Proposal and the Case of Bolivia." In Working Paper 11 18: Peace Research Institute Frankfurt, 2012. "Ya Se Invent La Rueda... Inventar La Plvora?". Caretas 1834 November 16 2004. Yukl, Gary A. Leadership in Organizations 7th ed. Upper Saddle River, N.J.: Prentice Hall, 2010. Zakari a, Fareed. "The Rise of Illiberal Democracy." Foreign Affairs 76, no. 6 (1997): 22 43. Zaleznik, Abraham. "Managers and Leaders. Are They Different?" Harvard Business Review no. March April (1992). Zarefsky, David "The Presidency Has Always Been a Place fo r Rhetorical Leadership In The Presidency and Rhetorical Leadership edited by Leroy G. Dorsey, [viii], 270 p. College Station: Texas A&M University Press, 2002.

PAGE 498

498 BIOGRAPHICAL SKETCH Ana Mar a (Ani) De la Quintana was born during dictatorship in La Paz, Bolivia She grew up surrounded by fa mily; her parents, two siblings, grandparents and extended family From an early age she started playing the piano and riding horses. She went to a Catholic school in La Paz, after graduation she became an exchange stu dent in the United States For four years Ani took e conomics classes at both Universidad Catolica Boliviana and Univesidad Mayor de San Andres, but not satisfied decided to cha p olitical s cience from Universidad Nuestra Se ora de La Paz instead Learning about power was only the start. In order to have a hands on approach to solving problems s degree in p ublic p olic y in Bolivia, but a life twist prompted to move to the United States in 2002. She became interested in learning about the best ways to get leaders elected through democratic means and she in political science with a certificate in political campaigning in 2004 from Universtity of Florida With more questions in her head she became a doctorate student at Universtity of Florida Political Science Department. In the fall of 2007, she moved to Washington, DC to work for Hamilton Ca mpaigns, a political campaigning firm. She currently resides in the District of Columbia with her husband Miki and daughter Amelia.