<%BANNER%>

Quantification of Asymmetrical Stepping Post-Stroke and Its Relationship to Hemiparetic Walking Performance

Permanent Link: http://ufdc.ufl.edu/UFE0022333/00001

Material Information

Title: Quantification of Asymmetrical Stepping Post-Stroke and Its Relationship to Hemiparetic Walking Performance
Physical Description: 1 online resource (163 p.)
Language: english
Creator: Balasubramanian, Chitralakshmi
Publisher: University of Florida
Place of Publication: Gainesville, Fla.
Publication Date: 2008

Subjects

Subjects / Keywords: asymmetry, biomechanics, exercise, gait, quanitification, rehabilitation, step, stepping, stroke, walking
Rehabilitation Science -- Dissertations, Academic -- UF
Genre: Rehabilitation Science thesis, Ph.D.
bibliography   ( marcgt )
theses   ( marcgt )
government publication (state, provincial, terriorial, dependent)   ( marcgt )
born-digital   ( sobekcm )
Electronic Thesis or Dissertation

Notes

Abstract: Asymmetrical stepping is a characteristic feature of hemiparetic walking and a result of sensorimotor deficits post-stroke. Asymmetry measures (that is, relative performance of paretic leg) may characterize hemiparetic gait better than overall gait performance measures (such as gait speed) and can provide insights into underlying paretic leg impairments. Therefore, the major purpose of this dissertation was to quantify the asymmetry in steps post-stroke and understand its relationship to hemiparetic walking performance. Overall, four studies were conducted. Persons with chronic hemiparesis and healthy controls walked overground and over a split-belt instrumented treadmill as spatiotemporal, kinematic and kinetic data were collected. Clinical assessments included lower-extremity Fugl-Meyer grading and Dynamic Gait Index assessments. In study one, step length asymmetry during walking was quantified. Results showed that step length asymmetry related to propulsive force generation during hemiparetic walking. Further, asymmetrical step lengths may not necessarily limit the self-selected walking speed likely due to other compensatory mechanisms. We suggest that step length asymmetry can be utilized as a clinical measure to evaluate asymmetrical stepping post-stroke. In study two, step-by-step variability and its relation to asymmetrical stepping were investigated. Results showed that increased spatiotemporal variability, asymmetry in swing and pre-swing time variability and reduced width variability were related to severe hemiparesis, asymmetrical stepping and poor balance. We suggest that step-by-step variability measures are quantifiable markers of impaired walking performance post-stroke. In study three, asymmetrical stepping was evaluated in a body reference frame. Results showed that anterior-posterior and medial-lateral foot placements relative to body were asymmetrical and this foot placement asymmetry related to step length asymmetry but not step widths. Wider paretic foot placement relative to pelvis than non-paretic also related to reduced paretic leg weight support and lateral instability, suggesting the clinical utility of medial-lateral foot placement relative to pelvis as an outcome to quantify weight support during hemiparetic walking. In study four, mechanisms underlying step length generation were evaluated. Contralateral anterior-posterior and hip impulses during swing explained the step length variability in the majority of participants. However, relationship of the predictors to step lengths differed in the asymmetrical sub-groups. This implies that mechanisms of step length generation were different across persons showing differing step length asymmetry patterns. Based on these mechanisms, we have proposed specific impairments and therapeutic strategies targeted towards these impairments underlying asymmetrical stepping.
General Note: In the series University of Florida Digital Collections.
General Note: Includes vita.
Bibliography: Includes bibliographical references.
Source of Description: Description based on online resource; title from PDF title page.
Source of Description: This bibliographic record is available under the Creative Commons CC0 public domain dedication. The University of Florida Libraries, as creator of this bibliographic record, has waived all rights to it worldwide under copyright law, including all related and neighboring rights, to the extent allowed by law.
Statement of Responsibility: by Chitralakshmi Balasubramanian.
Thesis: Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of Florida, 2008.
Local: Adviser: Kautz, Steven A.

Record Information

Source Institution: UFRGP
Rights Management: Applicable rights reserved.
Classification: lcc - LD1780 2008
System ID: UFE0022333:00001

Permanent Link: http://ufdc.ufl.edu/UFE0022333/00001

Material Information

Title: Quantification of Asymmetrical Stepping Post-Stroke and Its Relationship to Hemiparetic Walking Performance
Physical Description: 1 online resource (163 p.)
Language: english
Creator: Balasubramanian, Chitralakshmi
Publisher: University of Florida
Place of Publication: Gainesville, Fla.
Publication Date: 2008

Subjects

Subjects / Keywords: asymmetry, biomechanics, exercise, gait, quanitification, rehabilitation, step, stepping, stroke, walking
Rehabilitation Science -- Dissertations, Academic -- UF
Genre: Rehabilitation Science thesis, Ph.D.
bibliography   ( marcgt )
theses   ( marcgt )
government publication (state, provincial, terriorial, dependent)   ( marcgt )
born-digital   ( sobekcm )
Electronic Thesis or Dissertation

Notes

Abstract: Asymmetrical stepping is a characteristic feature of hemiparetic walking and a result of sensorimotor deficits post-stroke. Asymmetry measures (that is, relative performance of paretic leg) may characterize hemiparetic gait better than overall gait performance measures (such as gait speed) and can provide insights into underlying paretic leg impairments. Therefore, the major purpose of this dissertation was to quantify the asymmetry in steps post-stroke and understand its relationship to hemiparetic walking performance. Overall, four studies were conducted. Persons with chronic hemiparesis and healthy controls walked overground and over a split-belt instrumented treadmill as spatiotemporal, kinematic and kinetic data were collected. Clinical assessments included lower-extremity Fugl-Meyer grading and Dynamic Gait Index assessments. In study one, step length asymmetry during walking was quantified. Results showed that step length asymmetry related to propulsive force generation during hemiparetic walking. Further, asymmetrical step lengths may not necessarily limit the self-selected walking speed likely due to other compensatory mechanisms. We suggest that step length asymmetry can be utilized as a clinical measure to evaluate asymmetrical stepping post-stroke. In study two, step-by-step variability and its relation to asymmetrical stepping were investigated. Results showed that increased spatiotemporal variability, asymmetry in swing and pre-swing time variability and reduced width variability were related to severe hemiparesis, asymmetrical stepping and poor balance. We suggest that step-by-step variability measures are quantifiable markers of impaired walking performance post-stroke. In study three, asymmetrical stepping was evaluated in a body reference frame. Results showed that anterior-posterior and medial-lateral foot placements relative to body were asymmetrical and this foot placement asymmetry related to step length asymmetry but not step widths. Wider paretic foot placement relative to pelvis than non-paretic also related to reduced paretic leg weight support and lateral instability, suggesting the clinical utility of medial-lateral foot placement relative to pelvis as an outcome to quantify weight support during hemiparetic walking. In study four, mechanisms underlying step length generation were evaluated. Contralateral anterior-posterior and hip impulses during swing explained the step length variability in the majority of participants. However, relationship of the predictors to step lengths differed in the asymmetrical sub-groups. This implies that mechanisms of step length generation were different across persons showing differing step length asymmetry patterns. Based on these mechanisms, we have proposed specific impairments and therapeutic strategies targeted towards these impairments underlying asymmetrical stepping.
General Note: In the series University of Florida Digital Collections.
General Note: Includes vita.
Bibliography: Includes bibliographical references.
Source of Description: Description based on online resource; title from PDF title page.
Source of Description: This bibliographic record is available under the Creative Commons CC0 public domain dedication. The University of Florida Libraries, as creator of this bibliographic record, has waived all rights to it worldwide under copyright law, including all related and neighboring rights, to the extent allowed by law.
Statement of Responsibility: by Chitralakshmi Balasubramanian.
Thesis: Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of Florida, 2008.
Local: Adviser: Kautz, Steven A.

Record Information

Source Institution: UFRGP
Rights Management: Applicable rights reserved.
Classification: lcc - LD1780 2008
System ID: UFE0022333:00001


This item has the following downloads:


Full Text
xml version 1.0 encoding UTF-8
REPORT xmlns http:www.fcla.edudlsmddaitss xmlns:xsi http:www.w3.org2001XMLSchema-instance xsi:schemaLocation http:www.fcla.edudlsmddaitssdaitssReport.xsd
INGEST IEID E20101203_AAAAAW INGEST_TIME 2010-12-03T09:43:31Z PACKAGE UFE0022333_00001
AGREEMENT_INFO ACCOUNT UF PROJECT UFDC
FILES
FILE SIZE 25271604 DFID F20101203_AAAKNI ORIGIN DEPOSITOR PATH kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_147.tif GLOBAL false PRESERVATION BIT MESSAGE_DIGEST ALGORITHM MD5
f7e54184a91aaa382973b84538b526fc
SHA-1
6f0354b77e3941ab62c9572e4776fa28cc46e103
F20101203_AAAKMT kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_042.tif
b921e90fd3e93266c49d421c5dec19ef
cd90dd67b3b9e3e66c16f39c68708a9ef3ebc5b1
28201 F20101203_AAAKNJ kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_142.QC.jpg
442bea76ccb9846b573654122d4cafaf
94bdf981cc1969cf2ea18b4ac2cfd6eb621cc630
581981 F20101203_AAAKMU kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_087.jp2
9fe4a2424b29fe805f83834285d2673b
232062d7efaeecc52c4d492cf1a9bf66e28349ca
27691 F20101203_AAAKNK kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_125.QC.jpg
113e2892e4e0d21e295c4bd047688970
27ce984a4b054f724a6a629e8d9e19187fe35f85
229130 F20101203_AAAKMV kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_136.jp2
cdb344d770c82cfebfd014d08cb39410
1eec5155577cbb177a98e94b914dd64dfcf7031a
1367 F20101203_AAAKMW kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_003thm.jpg
845ef056b607427ee99c4f3447210569
0e76d0515f5c7e5dbfd4202594e43796a0741917
7199 F20101203_AAAKOA kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_094thm.jpg
d7312a1bf81930941640246569138072
d0f468fcd9af75e760529deb1094dff24f433ea3
13845 F20101203_AAAKNL kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_087.QC.jpg
2025a031b4ef3cc30e267fb7fff05139
a603966a35f4dbb50b1e3a3b742663cc0a63226e
7142 F20101203_AAAKMX kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_015thm.jpg
bea50ae2c1213085b633ac606422b62d
125100f8d2bee711478b98e6ed5caf80d935eb6a
87644 F20101203_AAAKOB kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_036.jpg
057d8f1d019e633b343c4aa3a876dfe6
ff735f55335ea8488a06797efcb5e541efce0ba7
45114 F20101203_AAAKNM kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_137.jpg
3c0021d55dd8f909d4e59031c81521fc
c63b2dcaefbedcc4cc4904c54a32706cdac34c81
F20101203_AAAKMY kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_081.tif
1d6bc7a1e43a7c43d403e6d2cf091526
7c9f1b7f2cb1542ebe1948864b60ed7c060bb3b2
1051926 F20101203_AAAKOC kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_059.jp2
10f4892ecd914b11722bc43e3c3f4f11
5ae98e7f4a997fa447507b8093eb0ca2e2bec784
769538 F20101203_AAAKNN kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_066.jp2
eb30bf56b4feb95e0b828cc570dc1768
277f95763c1f057bf33bf0aafb46ddc2e4bba9a6
1001013 F20101203_AAAKMZ kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_010.jp2
2deba5f5e03a3a77f7780fc93785bd6b
333058a317dfe803bae843c5d353cd6b4a8dc653
86525 F20101203_AAAKOD kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_050.jpg
60b25c881e5e1f267cf3c93ff8b686ce
38d537bd17ed620698d02fc6bfcbd84708eddcc1
7268 F20101203_AAAKNO kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_032thm.jpg
77781a74d192534aec99da06150d96ec
efdf4131566766545d559141e2e1254c78439544
4679 F20101203_AAAKOE kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_135thm.jpg
74040080237e664e0f9df992e90adcfa
8fbad672308b245de4ab8160b813b5086481f1c6
22040 F20101203_AAAKNP kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_133.QC.jpg
74b1b81ae163f9f8174cab4a14ab3337
cdf1b4134fdfff3e289aab344672cc00375e75da
649726 F20101203_AAAKOF kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_067.jp2
fe73a69930fcadc8c4b3a96fe0ec837c
e128c03bc1acfef5c72abe4a5c84c79fa9ff1a39
F20101203_AAAKNQ kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_102.tif
3092a9396318edc2fc858053d514b7f0
b06a01c276a7749451b123fbad5a64673e599362
9960 F20101203_AAAKOG kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_064.QC.jpg
d50aa14ccb4ea35065198cbfc59c52c4
a332e2561293659acc070ca41cc120abd3b1fe5b
7544 F20101203_AAAKNR kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_128thm.jpg
0225a0699d74d4c120ea993f203ea6b4
c971f327b28a086dbc4298cf4cf69c22f0eed3f4
849562 F20101203_AAAKOH kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_084.jp2
cc96815c90f9eaa7d142a6009f34827a
e57cc1558bec8f7373c27b0de81ac92a4a7dc8ff
25737 F20101203_AAAKNS kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_054.QC.jpg
d102ca62712feeb2de4f328aada5ee60
036b810eb2deff3f111656aab63a05d603d604c7
11527 F20101203_AAAKOI kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_010.QC.jpg
f7269900bc2a621389d9d28181c1cf50
84070a05ba21802de560f5438502aa88c5f87f12
F20101203_AAAKNT kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_119.tif
e8e5c3e27911713d2dc724789a52dfb0
cb92344d0f8da1680977164c3665da1c2f4acff1
F20101203_AAAKOJ kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_132.tif
dc9fb14afe7147a6309eec268fe3db9e
13fdbd606a90d76041a6951bb0b648bd29e98a17
25202 F20101203_AAAKNU kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_072.QC.jpg
fad4192e7d999f0307092b1157e54c78
ef9e5c3373874673d1892cfdd6259720f1fe843c
21508 F20101203_AAAKOK kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_138.QC.jpg
548cba292ea240e28f7bc051c0f1b622
57fe0199ddc9e9cd103bc87ca65f0ebfafef949b
99058 F20101203_AAAKNV kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_158.jpg
1a237bb5194ca8d7c5e8e0a98964366b
3c1db8a4a221b0023e2f4f8324e7b4b883ec7e2e
103873 F20101203_AAAKOL kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_145.jpg
2b80590cd4510a2449b5b1f25af059ff
112c750d2fb57aaf5337b34adeacd6101c8321ee
F20101203_AAAKNW kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_130.tif
ef386ed8a40f137b2219c70f7562b177
8d388505fc58bb0fea4e5b83d92304e140e6008c
3647 F20101203_AAAKNX kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_067thm.jpg
a568a59c7cb0e8a0cd9807c0d70d3970
9f6b27f89bf1ef63f9c941f08810eafa61de424f
7752 F20101203_AAAKPA kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_126thm.jpg
7297493770990c5ef71ac4c35c8c1146
2d48b0a5af4f01b5da988cc63b36b056343df4cb
7054 F20101203_AAAKOM kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_095thm.jpg
47573a39d445f33e22f012e97be40a4f
4116342604efc6b4710fa122d3f5bdaaaf639c67
7022 F20101203_AAAKNY kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_145thm.jpg
dc98f50f253be66369479ba71c13056d
fbd688508ef07fb1af33f2d12cda500faa998ac6
26556 F20101203_AAAKPB kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_116.QC.jpg
1390d70cb75861674f3acac615378369
fdb38a454092bdd01fb8ecb6f4bf3d3e24f6997b
815458 F20101203_AAAKON kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_108.jp2
124f9a2adfa3b40fbaaec6abddb45914
3a3a7ee2036f5196618594c819b11c2429eb118c
F20101203_AAAKNZ kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_043.tif
109b098e20f3dc81b7eb32594d92c046
d5aeb4e157d08fd3198ec3397c01e90895542fec
69741 F20101203_AAAKPC kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_014.jpg
bff2026d2a97c83851691cd76e649f4c
148c9e0944c60f452ab9edbc7c42a94b459152e8
87699 F20101203_AAAKOO kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_077.jpg
491e545add552161c808c4800eab81a0
27423568b0b2fd17b36993cbcf615cc4a9e3fa04
60181 F20101203_AAAKPD kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_110.jpg
5271544fa98bd6030770b7b9d78658f2
047084cb655ba4282706553ab5c180df22a0f567
87376 F20101203_AAAKOP kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_049.jpg
7050462cbec7ae6b9f4c11a3c2d677f4
7b80c8e62c77048c970726cd7669ce980a0e8a21
25592 F20101203_AAAKPE kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_051.QC.jpg
0d9b343f258021f30c1244d760049fe2
516926371bfbf8ef080e5d765a57bf7acf7e1b5a
7009 F20101203_AAAKOQ kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_160thm.jpg
94a5848ac23a1b8c852d5b2a61a2299d
0c548e35c7b88785067717b9e52e57c2306cf7de
1051961 F20101203_AAAKPF kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_030.jp2
0182e2a24e073847c01be15bf626a305
b8f959f9d9bd5be07dde3950702081dbdc232cd3
845974 F20101203_AAAKOR kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_043.jp2
ac9c7008bf661beede9aa7e64e11473b
e8ab428e4dfa4a9d15a1d673008ed55d6d195b8c
28339 F20101203_AAAKPG kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_097.QC.jpg
3c3ccc8e3c3d9bc62a64c7b41d28d59e
39b96890770be7f95567f7c4ba85684d8312646e
26975 F20101203_AAAKOS kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_161.QC.jpg
abc619fda035d9da5ded854f19292e92
9b058802598cd1d252e5dbb71b4143a8fd368323
7630 F20101203_AAAKPH kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_103thm.jpg
e31f18544354691b653bf76f7b4a02d2
f84b971169c39885d9324a133493d0a6ee34e213
3124 F20101203_AAAKOT kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_003.QC.jpg
f6401a73300d5ec9949084ceff4c2b25
a667691f90b2790d0661f0aba7fa9e5a6fd805f6
7340 F20101203_AAAKPI kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_156thm.jpg
0bb1155c50224192fe8f0f1d6aedce4e
c892229f221837e60079b082364d45829a342e4b
F20101203_AAAKOU kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_075.tif
126beb6c099d6394d12a290fed276b3f
82d1346f2c325fc1fbf3ae778e529975b08068ed
37279 F20101203_AAAKPJ kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_069.jpg
79e3052937b1ed45ccf90121ea31b260
e35b6176cfee9fe1eeb14bd815b7c05a196e59ee
10215 F20101203_AAAKOV kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_003.jpg
6ba95e0c8a289516daa0ded28e89478c
e7ccfb98fe35481fcfb0c67bd46be3a7a40f3da4
1051976 F20101203_AAAKPK kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_033.jp2
d2e31c4cefe076a2829363bf220521d5
54af16a9f0f51c236eba126f1d3ede75965fc63e
19957 F20101203_AAAKOW kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_108.QC.jpg
5cd79e0be203d4e27d18502b26848146
09d66f3716ac9c0623fb9c83236b369a33b485c6
F20101203_AAAKPL kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_007.tif
b9fd17e7e0ae665cdbde2ce0c80a3925
f9e57f006f1c30f0d843df2aa056bb5270d3e8bc
F20101203_AAAKOX kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_050.jp2
71aad9b5aee7cb1040afd7ab2f9eb65d
a249a738e6256b300e8734dfa9c512d130dc8a2c
1051977 F20101203_AAAKQA kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_028.jp2
fcb21b32baf2e9f964f31b499db026fc
de5d2161852eef3369a3de22411f2ddd8b7cdc90
F20101203_AAAKPM kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_092.tif
5f5c152e5186771b371a22324c4e9c13
74fa7cf2b13bd16878bb058ba0fcb5a292babec4
1051914 F20101203_AAAKOY kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_072.jp2
dfce42508a1abc7955925a082a8d755b
61ceb0a4fb4a4709b0f9d5fb7b987267f9d9e741
7339 F20101203_AAAKQB kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_022thm.jpg
95d769bac73e14895836e30a079dce4f
9cecdc30aec9b8ae1912a56062bf3e1fd85c2472
88728 F20101203_AAAKOZ kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_101.jpg
9aec1ff5e79b05642eb1ce81437d43e0
583e96a04ff990d9f949b24b0527cfa36f25dc3a
F20101203_AAAKQC kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_142.tif
bb499a6be93dfb2c10b736765c58f1cd
96070c777bf0e873ee887e02c4af114c9af63846
1051971 F20101203_AAAKPN kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_151.jp2
b6f908546ad20fc7327e690fe5f62960
8cb85b113218678ba1e41c4ffe301007adcc7bbe
130309 F20101203_AAAKQD UFE0022333_00001.mets FULL
684208483fded4b186fc816f2cd87bf6
e84e935c80398b0497e4aa275ed05656aa16d0a3
7828 F20101203_AAAKPO kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_162.QC.jpg
469e5b369a85503eb1b7d6578ce60bf8
6cd33f95a8c322f1b833b80d60120e1871bac3f4
1051943 F20101203_AAAKPP kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_023.jp2
b734c81200b13cb01b64152340bb890f
3dea918e77874d80b8de3b87cebbd946e630229b
F20101203_AAAKPQ kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_074.tif
5f59acb0891396b19fb8079c9a21147c
b9c94a73edd04764d48def3e41dea7ffd2c6e493
28393 F20101203_AAAKQG kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_001.jpg
5f8e1048fc142335d1ca83b72fad7543
88e4f705fd353dbff804315543f8dcbacf9d6c65
27406 F20101203_AAAKPR kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_025.QC.jpg
6bd415b9d643296c6b922d0254644959
f9adc76f77d50d3819273573a02cf16ffaeac7a0
11250 F20101203_AAAKQH kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_002.jpg
21f55d3d4061b956d4060eb6d4725605
5231cabc9f94cb697c3840275aa48137ae5db8ed
1051948 F20101203_AAAKPS kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_099.jp2
6a7b98ffb4fbe97c83b9852a770359ec
97f1ac52d13618f5dea1e2e5c383e67cb93d5278
87979 F20101203_AAAKQI kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_004.jpg
400ef257921728bf5c42dbcda0d850fc
f5567b789383f8de4e3da184229c0af2fbacb64a
F20101203_AAAKPT kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_126.tif
ab44f32ce9fb6db65b5f6b4d2707dde3
687a026a1a48da3e8fa6a1b286ffa741e9eaff30
85680 F20101203_AAAKQJ kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_005.jpg
73f9d1594c0628b20acce90d3abf378c
3f1ea0b4673b696c11bfd5c90f5c32117ba7ba3c
21300 F20101203_AAAKPU kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_082.QC.jpg
f79c21e83ec8bcb82d2e9275c3d77c2f
e785a620927f915fa9af92a230e40ac64c2c6370
100058 F20101203_AAAKQK kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_006.jpg
c5c9f7f96ba9cb46e69ad349db408028
d6f6673d5117ab53df465ee986c7f1b7e284932c
66808 F20101203_AAAKPV kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_009.jpg
e4464dad73e3528b13d10e5a50ca8342
faf2b2854b2720632b0310cfbcc2b2a9b692fd53
112943 F20101203_AAAKQL kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_007.jpg
93b4ddbff07275534d2fd677ddc03747
0c3bde48866420a7322b129a0974dbba5e12fbe2
F20101203_AAAKPW kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_066.tif
a7e9a8f1c11979700c9e97ffa3886cf5
e0d417f37bcfeb14ab599696493db94f689ab9b2
86086 F20101203_AAAKRA kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_027.jpg
93fb4853bb4cfa748fd252aef1fb8c91
380b7653636e859aab984b395bd13e8d5913db1b
107348 F20101203_AAAKQM kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_008.jpg
11e9dbafc398c80f284431e5629b6bf8
bc6c129c1aa85bff5ffecfa365e60df89bf9c8b9
1053954 F20101203_AAAKPX kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_082.tif
adf7ac99dab4b35b538bdde4480a568d
9c63ffc4c165bd60e0df9429b425a3aa8c8acbeb
86181 F20101203_AAAKRB kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_028.jpg
55bafd3a9dd3beaa37e8e960903d5657
7f86500d40a7e5c80d13e127c4e7db2e50480fcd
40351 F20101203_AAAKQN kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_010.jpg
1e67941d6e8df39bec036aa53d46c3f6
cb054a2d8963f8a73276ee6b0c37cfa002f462bd
6906 F20101203_AAAKPY kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_020thm.jpg
274dd6e31c4498bf4f3fc1a7193d0c18
da42c999067eeb1a7135279c2783cfda017351c3
85826 F20101203_AAAKRC kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_029.jpg
c01ae12c9f35f9b16c040bcec6a533e3
f21dabdcde562933f0418f2925930bd2fa4b7758
602699 F20101203_AAAKPZ kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_083.jp2
0d33a55671ef41f4d637770cefefcac0
2146bb909c53b5a679eeaf17ce24e616f1ce8a18
87989 F20101203_AAAKRD kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_030.jpg
395e6222d80aa7f095fa4b4dd18b5134
cbd21d43260f3e7db4718fef2ef953fbea07c930
76394 F20101203_AAAKQO kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_013.jpg
d58f6bda90683f58a1f909f3464715bf
252d47730a09d5700ef81033c70ea23bd6a1aa4b
84447 F20101203_AAAKRE kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_031.jpg
cf5e318614759bda40c8301b905330d6
445255258a19cf01333695df8b5c49fbd5cb71a1
85212 F20101203_AAAKQP kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_015.jpg
73e28ce592a3aedd634d37d853ffe7d7
a809815aa10d7ac34fcfe37b7605ef2e47cfaf04
85792 F20101203_AAAKRF kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_032.jpg
ac27d22a04a9c39663b6026a9cf6d627
5c345342e063c17d2cf5e32939ff22c50228dea7
85666 F20101203_AAAKQQ kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_016.jpg
ef4896fef9803078307247e063beeae4
00368a6611433fea1efcadff89b1afbfd4b0b210
86175 F20101203_AAAKRG kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_033.jpg
52655858ea6858c2dcca346179f72526
17b1e638ca6ff2422b46ca576ed4dc1f954ce006
79854 F20101203_AAAKQR kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_017.jpg
14189b273d64e51c01cd4544cd0b4bc3
9762332033d93fe0f60fb4ac46d75aaa72bd67c4
74944 F20101203_AAAKQS kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_018.jpg
8dd1c2051a468b86cd590f58cfb75c79
759b3081ea49d13b0b8648f0967f79edc58f2cbf
91610 F20101203_AAAKRH kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_034.jpg
9b5ed2b31e4ccc2c2239524d484e2287
b3b81b5bb3c2df4b8e3ead65c99c1928864d7bee
84587 F20101203_AAAKQT kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_019.jpg
376e6241860249069047feb23bb79fc7
b843725381a72f2adb6a8b7bc841dcae8014fd0e
89543 F20101203_AAAKRI kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_035.jpg
61c249e4348991742fc206a644bce589
33c26b23c62f8108557a832b4eb202aefecb4c2e
78971 F20101203_AAAKQU kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_020.jpg
fc5f3905dc807231691b113e1fb53d4d
a563f8da215e7d7a4cff0f6614ff959efa1a8f8d
82033 F20101203_AAAKRJ kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_037.jpg
fbd0f5d84b381ede198b29fe7a3284e1
3e7a643e122c0caca40d7b6ddf347234e31064da
83252 F20101203_AAAKQV kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_021.jpg
e409ff7f16f47eba9441248843a3dc96
9c5a0a01a3ba29c8a11b6222516d265c1b391419
83767 F20101203_AAAKRK kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_038.jpg
268f3a0748323b119a8a433570c73083
9a8fa265d82aae8dc92d86671a49da065b9a7a6a
83757 F20101203_AAAKQW kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_023.jpg
b55fec488c64c9ab60e67b8a7cb75622
623d53779a59610e9b404e3eb3fa4ba8c892e851
87675 F20101203_AAAKRL kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_039.jpg
ec0ee031d352abd29db8173de864ce38
66a9b4be193a83cc61d80b5f4dceb13014deb66f
87694 F20101203_AAAKQX kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_024.jpg
56f5cf250cef7473b9a528c7b5b39ecf
9a36d6361e6d1d7a3c47c0c8cf6013cb5b361b63
87224 F20101203_AAAKSA kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_059.jpg
07a553d90539ef6cd0c1ecfeb89928a8
a833ceeccff131548dc055daec32568dac86e6f2
85523 F20101203_AAAKRM kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_040.jpg
8b12db573e511677de4906b4eeb4b69a
c54a88f2487d0e7b41e42f838762621e21b53c83
84702 F20101203_AAAKQY kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_025.jpg
408e7113ade66a79e036633dfbe4a76e
952e23a2011307773f919f5aab756f0746ff32b6
86980 F20101203_AAAKSB kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_060.jpg
50be5f61cf777af48cfb10cc75ed5253
338327a2534d9fe69d9637147c0072c1f3255253
90190 F20101203_AAAKRN kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_041.jpg
210c9d329cfd77e8cf30a27d12956595
fb3b7ce527e90088699340006d9faaaf8a52a47f
88174 F20101203_AAAKQZ kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_026.jpg
6391168d31104b53c53a9ca7c47221d6
68ab83ad4e2b6b601ae581c4f9557491df4e0c5d
87831 F20101203_AAAKSC kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_061.jpg
c72573c55f8fa8ab0db7fcab08ac67ad
e67c37db57e00447e902f349aa1549f6945c6b26
67492 F20101203_AAAKRO kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_042.jpg
87780cc3cb870ccf4406df41b4104193
9a382cc5ac37bca8492e42f91d155d28cf251c43
85109 F20101203_AAAKSD kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_062.jpg
f3741d161ce7eacda66e3c1b64557f74
8a29351f5e7ab6635edeb7d3740aff4fda0f52b8
79346 F20101203_AAAKSE kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_063.jpg
5c1a537dee48be76e0e4264a5d8b821c
e2f82489e1f06b1cfa6c69ed5da67cf8e6e29a03
40275 F20101203_AAAKRP kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_043.jpg
00e1828c3fdc123cc9d05f6ba2103223
f09f08e6c12bf4e2c5c822511ad7a5d07d1e6622
29963 F20101203_AAAKSF kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_064.jpg
39eaa2cf2cb4be96195b1da32cbd8f71
fbd39e51c05d2ef646d523cc4a0f72635374726b
45870 F20101203_AAAKRQ kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_044.jpg
8a928af9d4dbc87a7d7c61473bc8606e
6ae2dfd0743c5babc76fffde8caf9bbd26f7f314
43243 F20101203_AAAKSG kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_065.jpg
34abb605eb3394e94d73989e6666672e
33d2b86543a9a10bc709885d9174b2d50a8c14cf
64131 F20101203_AAAKRR kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_045.jpg
1a2f302c8c77cf140d137f26624aefdf
6e1d490c101e8c79118afd0438601a6283d26b32
58682 F20101203_AAAKSH kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_066.jpg
7a96233255bf0c907feaae7bc8d5ce43
d19c745f3520fa1ddd83a2605f050a3db2687976
45438 F20101203_AAAKRS kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_046.jpg
b1dc873ea3e4f8dab37f2b932d98e061
79fd9838936bc986c5d4a6ff3048afb6baec924f
40852 F20101203_AAAKSI kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_067.jpg
a88b3cf891cfd3981c0987318b4ac910
3a195771f516807dc20e223693e2ca095d2cfb66
48608 F20101203_AAAKRT kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_048.jpg
821fbba77abb74f522e448411975552c
f333f30b4acf34b4344c985fd0230fe30c743e40
87056 F20101203_AAAKSJ kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_070.jpg
e174bd1cb657d8f9885279a0064cb1fa
3b26c5815d1902ed8becc15d025fa2cbe87f1619
80859 F20101203_AAAKRU kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_051.jpg
0a65e4cda752a41d461ae147cf460988
7c244f6abfd9fbf7a972105dd72f3c615400d29c
83484 F20101203_AAAKSK kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_071.jpg
e0475cc79e8c1a28dcf2a4fe362b75ff
3950d345d0eacd1009a8358bf45716a771c3e4d0
88115 F20101203_AAAKRV kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_053.jpg
e43baaa88bffd4c56960887ebcef88ff
00bffeba6bd4b8e60c9630f9fe339c4794c826af
78994 F20101203_AAAKSL kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_072.jpg
73fbd2a60c9c1a09c8d3766d16acd940
8fc3879cd87fb3cff1b49b3a15e45d002e8b1a35
80245 F20101203_AAAKRW kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_054.jpg
5c01b700f665be021a1fc7f757cf8992
a9a71200c4c8501ed3fac20ce67d00b78deed644
81725 F20101203_AAAKTA kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_090.jpg
94f0246b65eb63703e9ba7f0361fcc45
4ff6fff54c6d55953262a57e98913bfcd36f8fa6
82749 F20101203_AAAKSM kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_073.jpg
d58cae4d2bac30445d737a02e59e4852
c9b9bde943c785bc6f51dd99a8ea757ca3d1cf8a
83098 F20101203_AAAKRX kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_055.jpg
308851153f8f906343cc504df05086e9
a1423e198f9c4d704a96240a99b3f051d76d111f
84808 F20101203_AAAKTB kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_091.jpg
1d2dca0dede92946f13a123a89cd7cee
9fba6e3d005e6fb38c5ebf6a37752326e937b6f1
85676 F20101203_AAAKSN kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_074.jpg
71ccc43bb6dc05b2678df070fef2c3c8
697aa9e50c7d40f821e00573af8cb4b3e3f5073b
87139 F20101203_AAAKRY kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_057.jpg
9688679e550dc45c099d9ce48a0ba973
f89e31fcfe107e2b65746d536f5852152cb26061
80976 F20101203_AAAKTC kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_092.jpg
444c7962220942d1737c7de27f5cf594
9fc85069bb5d7b1d2b94d368bb76b91c3a51b6ef
86704 F20101203_AAAKSO kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_076.jpg
67a337f024dcd747254aa4b4380baef8
fe6df5441269937bc626542cfb19fa999c22bde2
85365 F20101203_AAAKRZ kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_058.jpg
2bfd64fa52ae33320f8f36c6f1417f7f
ac0487bf580c50a6e1f853893c8de435301f88be
88761 F20101203_AAAKTD kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_093.jpg
8277eea329c55f215ba227e5a9d858b7
bed5d7f76633e8f8e1962bd36e632f016f95e7d7
92816 F20101203_AAAKSP kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_078.jpg
b5a07a4763586f0a4f30b5eb7f279750
b6dad170818fe22dea04b25877572105460453a2
85413 F20101203_AAAKTE kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_094.jpg
26b59e83955523e03a7050c52eebe8ba
2e78a0d35d9a6dcd14aaf7d4058bc6265f6d0265
82194 F20101203_AAAKTF kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_095.jpg
440b278ea1155bd861bfde8713f20fb3
34c905b6a45313321a424b612885e4654f12bbd5
89051 F20101203_AAAKSQ kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_079.jpg
e6b85aa1d6668be84bab278997e0a09f
4a2a2c4b1222a02c4becae53739b47c7a0213ebd
84806 F20101203_AAAKTG kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_096.jpg
dc62e9acd69d2a505dd2f5b75975e38f
8250e850c256230fb814bbb392a8409bd32e8eff
86651 F20101203_AAAKSR kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_080.jpg
a9e3f0d63634b97ab2a3588f6f59a0a9
6ac3b86dfbed2e1f31a7c965bd916b6da999bd94
87493 F20101203_AAAKTH kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_097.jpg
a41046a414d0b97d5144007f20613be1
f94966337fcff9ecc71fd573aa5cf5d58b2a74de
89698 F20101203_AAAKSS kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_081.jpg
734621cdaa69170d750f026680d4bd15
895f2e75e7994fec6c3476dfd6abfc7a073355e9
82188 F20101203_AAAKTI kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_098.jpg
f31f6bf4166b73f35e8247c1da80155e
0d8cfeff4ed2c2a221bcd93603960cc43b7ec591
64515 F20101203_AAAKST kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_082.jpg
3ac3967d3898173d889ae340371b7564
b58679e78ce729801ae9b41fdd6f3f9f72ceeda6
87889 F20101203_AAAKTJ kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_099.jpg
0e77eddaa146979209c9663b57c0a834
59a22f80421f19a28fa4147cbe662db3b95c0af7
43398 F20101203_AAAKSU kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_083.jpg
2ec98f42eae1823c460ed1680ef8986d
521c07e344751660f4d83ae52fd5b9c11e0a381b
85294 F20101203_AAAKTK kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_100.jpg
0e5ad3064adbb12c59b3857ac06fc4f2
b232023c29a5405f0f4dcd87304e1e0c49f47f82
45626 F20101203_AAAKSV kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_085.jpg
4ce0bb2e177e93f0d104c4b089fb0ad7
198e73e707cd126e7ae4d69dda66de5f51daaa03
86557 F20101203_AAAKTL kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_102.jpg
53d0885997dad7ece7d7f504753daa65
75711e0f6156964b0cd8d0b9b2e19a6f06c402b8
58241 F20101203_AAAKSW kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_086.jpg
ec646d3efe5731c54b06b82cdd8c5ab6
171e0f51565b549c2a4f88d66a8d9dca409f849f
88985 F20101203_AAAKTM kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_103.jpg
02ac7e13688bf42b387b2d635bdbd92a
b142af7937d469a4b4f567c07178f3eec43f6412
43878 F20101203_AAAKSX kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_087.jpg
4d65285c9f915c20ebacc9b61a191da2
90aff0a766adb888200680818a714f3db6774622
87802 F20101203_AAAKUA kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_124.jpg
45f89739b0e8bd061916f90adb10600d
cea6c064554f0dded5f9e2846087bda161a38041
64895 F20101203_AAAKTN kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_105.jpg
bda4a50023a388fbe3bcfa54bde787b5
3f712a1b0d39f50a7126e9b090565ed9666ad0fc
88129 F20101203_AAAKSY kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_088.jpg
ae85c3733c59d834cd039923af189098
4ecc6a3b4d6184dd44ada8d869073ddb26267d3c
87810 F20101203_AAAKUB kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_125.jpg
3b80fbd9e1b80fe0aa738e0d90dc6218
197a718e790b0c97a3b6ccb1fc8272c365ac4e18
47227 F20101203_AAAKTO kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_107.jpg
839f81541a8358c888bc30c6b86729e9
f9832f5138177b2137483597bc59ef3074f460ff
87026 F20101203_AAAKSZ kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_089.jpg
6bed9dd1422c1197186484da49ff3110
31da8550484ee5e6260ec1bbbde7b5a6e218e69f
92168 F20101203_AAAKUC kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_126.jpg
1715e380fc2801246b448a35eaecf065
c9c727bc3f705e48664e554403e8f6f1f5b3a71e
60723 F20101203_AAAKTP kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_108.jpg
a6752c6e42b649db990513e9b7262248
3525c5b04e9f54e90523a848ab72225ce45fd4f1
89644 F20101203_AAAKUD kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_127.jpg
2f164e634266780fe714a83048f0df98
104b7403bb08d97e2115de98b362e5b9d6535bc0
38938 F20101203_AAAKTQ kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_111.jpg
0a246ad47d60468ccb4b0bab72056fb9
297015044dae8d3f2419d9d8518eb63860204a56
86698 F20101203_AAAKUE kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_128.jpg
0cf441a42c12233b302b70c1e3bb22dc
8c8295832e8ad66f4dbd1f9f210fe99edaa1b250
65706 F20101203_AAAKUF kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_129.jpg
d9b48cedf111ee18f61be24628dfa2fc
0e65f25e641e75bad3296dff5850a642b1eb3f52
86266 F20101203_AAAKTR kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_112.jpg
d5a0602c46d81816b1b656d90c4dcddb
2652cb03038f99f4c805a8300fcf6f08590c3ce4
1051981 F20101203_AAALAA kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_154.jp2
d8e567edfbd755c591c3a947afeb4964
47758bbfd2aadc6a7f832b73a4cc0bd8987bd698
57167 F20101203_AAAKUG kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_130.jpg
7548b8eb357e5cea07e82a2086f68bfa
5ca35260af765f4fae3fe8877a9ad9cc0faf9180
89132 F20101203_AAAKTS kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_114.jpg
bbc7132cddf882901a00a3a6f8e07da3
b584c9794f93d356e4b2b640ebff3c4ee41eb291
1051945 F20101203_AAALAB kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_155.jp2
c56e0a24819728616dd57e00bcb19276
4acc4b3d57db1f591a4815c96f16425124df92d4
70911 F20101203_AAAKUH kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_131.jpg
dc22c9c8a19971d669f182953ab9c40c
9a6e8acbbaac9e7c7705c9b1668e8c9db50dcc96
81561 F20101203_AAAKTT kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_115.jpg
ecf60bbd9ad5ff3fc311a3aa41705bd7
fecbb23aa0ac7a8266957e92552775302ed8a5f5
1051952 F20101203_AAALAC kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_156.jp2
0750f2f1545a1a097d3a27b53f8d612f
07e3214d8ff23f20dc3e7047b227bae40a38594a
67556 F20101203_AAAKUI kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_132.jpg
fbc525135be9b8fce95d80c4957a4757
ff4b0643bfcbf91b2dfefc0e0174826e99a3c431
82911 F20101203_AAAKTU kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_116.jpg
2686be2f16b65d665e26083d16827ea7
45ac7fedd274552f0196feeb709c422736bed3b3
1051978 F20101203_AAALAD kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_158.jp2
63362f15e7829226791f7c2e502b5daf
90c5c11acf1a83590cc3ac9d70800e6eb7958363
72517 F20101203_AAAKUJ kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_133.jpg
f6ea3f41f384a5c4c8f01e62beae71a6
fcbe3bd5ed126828f79afd5e9f40e3328c3bb60e
88888 F20101203_AAAKTV kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_117.jpg
133e21e9c00885dbfd1d3753017c3bf7
8abf61e2317fa8793b333f41e9ac57a055db54d8
1051909 F20101203_AAALAE kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_159.jp2
31015679f4950839f9a43f1650118219
2e3564c1019cdf99d70e4b411d8c6f883c536ba5
34039 F20101203_AAAKUK kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_134.jpg
b908f8976dcbc15108093490d67df937
80406c3b54c6d3a9c40e512a826c2c7796e70997
86982 F20101203_AAAKTW kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_118.jpg
5f26feb5ad061e417c954911fb89d4d1
03a165394626ff29858db1f02eb0e0993f03b2b2
1051972 F20101203_AAALAF kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_160.jp2
4e1bdbed2d8e269cedcfa47e137c39c1
e49082766a98f50c565fd2beb30666e86845e626
48480 F20101203_AAAKUL kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_135.jpg
2c0504c8e25668ed59cc29a2aa506422
8de4b3a1952916c49913f9c9c5743f467311d9d4
83846 F20101203_AAAKTX kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_119.jpg
cddc1565c2b250b172c0cfb7d60f4185
8566ba6ccc4d3d494108dd1a71e634e3c6dbaf77
1051965 F20101203_AAALAG kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_161.jp2
9737df5e109263add6da9a9b238087c1
c97a2815847f11ebf5bb80ec3595926a70ff0bd0
89079 F20101203_AAAKVA kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_155.jpg
eefcd14d1327b1ce54b1b115b7e88050
2c7cc21ba706207313344d1b1a1799008b029104
26149 F20101203_AAAKUM kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_136.jpg
68fde5d782900ba1999d0d18b74650d2
f2e9d274af1d01e8ee0edc523b94bb8d8ff73972
87777 F20101203_AAAKTY kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_122.jpg
86db403dc70ce4e6f4bcd8f63d735898
46254f0890db042fc03d7785ef5c7f2caa55993e
301537 F20101203_AAALAH kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_162.jp2
98a5c09c09d4834b7abe867bcd17d723
f631136e17505c6b02b41a82e9fee1543dec8aa4
91289 F20101203_AAAKVB kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_156.jpg
e83894d6ebcdc3667174a226d305de95
33e0584a78cdf4edc3b44a6be710801286d45c5e
77653 F20101203_AAAKUN kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_138.jpg
d4c0007e46868c282af8d0b9b5792ff2
79b8bb933f313571b86178c10b6119f5ebd28115
90037 F20101203_AAAKTZ kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_123.jpg
a3f32d94d706ff0ee12a781b003ad5c2
60317cf7663d6b795323ce674c3590d666bcbd7d
827069 F20101203_AAALAI kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_163.jp2
3081e46d3ba13323c2dbbac87cf6542d
aa3276fbad9584f8c020f54808f4989b45ab3721
88826 F20101203_AAAKVC kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_157.jpg
68a2916228a58975d5b37e60a1393c51
4d636a2c748c7042cc8a0e01969472ebdb550a56
83273 F20101203_AAAKUO kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_140.jpg
3ecf2147a26a477f824f61a11a2431cc
dbcb8d4dc4f556fc70d2a91b0cae9ef0fb8b64e6
F20101203_AAALAJ kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_001.tif
4d907c8ab2018eea200b4c0d8b4e1f99
0998ae4770a73357bdaecb4631f97fea7e15a973
88900 F20101203_AAAKVD kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_159.jpg
2d67c79a865f15038c16068ec48f76c4
b070e66b4b1a47b491566c4d3dd1a7e7c6c3cc80
91758 F20101203_AAAKUP kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_141.jpg
0394188c4b7644eae02319f89f73863d
96d59bd6cda5ee5fb3490aef54ba905a85d22a28
F20101203_AAALAK kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_002.tif
c83896d576bb8ea6fee34d64a8f82e24
2ede27c05163748c3584665fd13f0cb092f08a85
95241 F20101203_AAAKVE kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_160.jpg
7802dc9788d6843efdaa2c297d0150d7
1b2456ac4172b3b5088f003d47f33c856eb45cd3
89026 F20101203_AAAKUQ kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_142.jpg
73d307f4f1a890a572b56780d419efd1
f180f866a927e6e29317a292dc69786a1ec732bb
F20101203_AAALAL kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_004.tif
68b4654a01b6ac916a809bab8d301aca
05c08c804761ca44f20019a0f3034399b89c71df
95845 F20101203_AAAKVF kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_161.jpg
a6bf41df4cf90366d72ce7ebb70535dc
355bfddf03deaaf9f0e46e69da80619454837559
81354 F20101203_AAAKUR kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_143.jpg
068805c659beeaefaf206e296fd5cf30
ec17e8c20e72730ab2d814b4287f1bbd268fb155
F20101203_AAALAM kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_005.tif
7cad43d14880e373523684668f9be096
4c7ed1db22188fad8abf6a90dcb6b629b961916a
26324 F20101203_AAAKVG kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_162.jpg
6fbaa747e073bfa404c34f4b6f847f7d
13e8f383838b0a3c7e9ff8e7c0aab1a286f44e09
F20101203_AAALBA kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_022.tif
cda7f70b133d57bbe61a693a74dcae5a
f23cd107bab8cfc7adaafbaa41eee73502316865
F20101203_AAALAN kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_006.tif
b7eba4b3b49c879038a2ce9b1228d1ed
60c7170d368bb93d22a6311efe8c76b788de0a62
61742 F20101203_AAAKVH kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_163.jpg
e1c84a56e5451a0aad02cea2a97afc24
0152b97ade873e505aa57523a539dd7d564b68ff
62767 F20101203_AAAKUS kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_144.jpg
f4c1df8e17ed0b7f7151dd232ab42b89
4fd1e9821fa1187116480c87291d2697cc11cb40
F20101203_AAALBB kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_024.tif
0b716598364800de582c8613f2faa3d8
51c49770b8c106a3ed9014744c9e8cff3dd0d670
F20101203_AAALAO kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_008.tif
3040156d6610e749c2ca372e5ff76e77
bba6b81df2b42613ed7b43ec686c7d840498bde9
297088 F20101203_AAAKVI kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_001.jp2
53792f87336c46a1bea7ae9f90bb9c5b
568be03901a5512d1580b3cdc9072c3fe98933e9
77124 F20101203_AAAKUT kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_146.jpg
40f6eaf89f5bf4f656434919cb8c8913
95620f4bfa98961271bde84e89dfff14cb902f0f
F20101203_AAALBC kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_025.tif
99da0662f084233036c62e02cc1d3a80
e996592b21e58313d2eaa1172fa1a6a3c3af7f84
F20101203_AAALAP kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_010.tif
6a41371b09e2d256f340ba1d63117775
a24226af37a1e7f8b176b48cfa5b79dbdf66567d
44667 F20101203_AAAKVJ kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_002.jp2
6c8539159ac7013e1fd90b8a0ad70033
acc3d69663f7c18484ca7845e4de3193de8c27c2
91423 F20101203_AAAKUU kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_148.jpg
4dc3b774c7922847cddb20e0142ea5db
ece0faa57eb82160c6ba542a43a2b5b29a958163
F20101203_AAALBD kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_027.tif
fddf3e0cdf018a95311814352abf8ac9
3d27c452e57d73489651c7d703d6695c2bbe1a3c
F20101203_AAALAQ kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_012.tif
d347d74c6b3b66ce921552f4d126e73e
a1e1f97ee3c47d7a3a721d60c01026e853ff804f
27826 F20101203_AAAKVK kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_003.jp2
0aedbd9be4cb84b7c54b56fb551efec7
fbb86f987cf450dce8f8843c58e8ef51868caaba
93224 F20101203_AAAKUV kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_149.jpg
80fde88e19e57efe97a36b61a013fa57
60553e176ae2cca9583b539f10909af1c1411f96
F20101203_AAALBE kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_028.tif
c87406ab675642faf0d2d2e10f0f67c7
472bed1ca40adc3b55088a0d9c61101b4faa84a3
F20101203_AAALAR kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_013.tif
a2323456968b65093712aca85eae1cdb
2f74abbd36a8773af79abfc53500d80ce8ecdf73
1051975 F20101203_AAAKVL kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_004.jp2
2fdee0e7758f0ca24f94479158c14b18
23b02ae650a184e705219dbc8b78646d2d7829d1
92265 F20101203_AAAKUW kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_150.jpg
c6d113f28e4a80d8e9fd7c62001c43f0
971febcd6759ea867022240d88551d94927d6b41
F20101203_AAALBF kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_029.tif
dc15d8b208e788efcb500dcf46d7c73c
0b29ebc6802ea574d0a4e7fb40c32a8cbb5fe176
1051963 F20101203_AAAKWA kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_021.jp2
bc0b6987a14c820d608f0e515f05f5e5
b80e41718157208700a331f08e1048c221a458c8
F20101203_AAALAS kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_014.tif
f291cb479fec36b85a6d17c29d00e71e
c36be5344da145a98cd51a888530f887aa7c139d
F20101203_AAAKVM kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_005.jp2
39fc65a3b5323270fa660e901202be90
1e1f75f9f715ec5df22f78849f58c4edb0b26eb4
91621 F20101203_AAAKUX kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_151.jpg
7f73c8c1783702868adbc0f05da903f6
8ecf6cdf9bf17e155dc4728be2621b37688aa301
F20101203_AAALBG kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_030.tif
b86a67fe9c1f410098d3e41811f3117b
ab397732b60bf9c7db7c545807838c36bd0d6bf8
1051984 F20101203_AAAKWB kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_022.jp2
b51a29d5e9f7babc9c47e20b0441f672
8df03546d61c9754a4e225757fb7f62214f1848a
F20101203_AAALAT kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_015.tif
34c0c43252114db9537cad01fc8cfc07
02ed530e255bba16452c386411c15668006190a4
F20101203_AAAKVN kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_006.jp2
fad15ea1d3687b7c6c1958ea7f236495
baed013648c192ab556227a8611f25f79324ec58
93860 F20101203_AAAKUY kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_152.jpg
5846cf67b4667c0af7d11d585fd2c14b
d6e209fdc6be4613de84b810276f26181e0b3fa4
F20101203_AAALBH kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_031.tif
38dc2d18ab3edd3bda709785e01ba36c
2991019914fa9ad064cca3107eacaea117beb197
1051964 F20101203_AAAKWC kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_025.jp2
fe1a0d18da082c383cfa99791d6b707b
3c833dc6f112735823dfbea53ea0f4b8520110a8
F20101203_AAALAU kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_016.tif
82a70e2e1f671a2776c7e721660318f8
6216966488f9c83d3591711fd9b7f1adbf3e8e22
F20101203_AAAKVO kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_007.jp2
3f2449961f53b8b9a5e05df1c4de5b28
726d7cf47fc10ca82bb9c18ec1f6a78fdf9bb5d7
93498 F20101203_AAAKUZ kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_153.jpg
a4651672400a818ba16f119e8ec0acdf
2eab3b2197b3e9aae3d18eaae1b5beba29d89253
F20101203_AAALBI kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_032.tif
5a920aead7a947bbb5a49fb3f2dc389d
4bb97a84ff9ead2d4f2822b682a3a9e2cd10cc7d
1051942 F20101203_AAAKWD kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_026.jp2
3e997e3d8907918a602d6b5d8b4d8cd8
3024dd0516386e7537deadde03470b8cc108b713
F20101203_AAALAV kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_017.tif
b750abdc4d28c12dba3ab3749893d310
44b95479efa5b0c6f696848396417c0275b14762
1051980 F20101203_AAAKVP kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_008.jp2
382e98fa8870bcd7ebf7cdca43a874fb
052f87b73bfa6cc1b1defdfa414e1be6a8d5e942
F20101203_AAALBJ kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_033.tif
03eb45c4ec6c8985a3266cdd4f7bbe7c
83caa1f9e4d9da14a476313dc34497acb1c98322
F20101203_AAALAW kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_018.tif
ca74bd9b08029fe8ebde7725f801be58
cc1976c3130076d597e65fa49da45e8bc6877461
1051956 F20101203_AAAKVQ kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_009.jp2
d830210640fa280ecd72f78c83cbeb69
17ec39e111401f0a9fbb79c397b0c26b3b7324aa
F20101203_AAALBK kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_034.tif
9423df263034a0c4828c84235891b4fb
3a624790141f14581f1cf02d9f195b8227edd268
1051939 F20101203_AAAKWE kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_027.jp2
e4d925c331e8dda2f0e7400691f6f4db
2c6af0cf6da242b271faa5f5336495a68ac9b24c
F20101203_AAALAX kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_019.tif
bdf3381a6eda4017a25efc921fea8ea1
4cbd5864ef712547be76784503fa81b22d667d84
F20101203_AAAKVR kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_011.jp2
b1f0c940e74d40781df0edee96f72b9c
d23cbfc31ee7e9ff00c26818ff4dd10f83710b8d
F20101203_AAALBL kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_035.tif
b16fa741e8a2a390f1941dd8cb589409
e72f246a4fab5916c68784c30d6ea01c2143ed96
F20101203_AAAKWF kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_031.jp2
3121917e7c307721734f8b32f2ff3cf8
77cb9023e110e9026fe415be3acfb6d5f0265321
F20101203_AAALAY kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_020.tif
e8d29314db0afe7d49718b8d9f848e2f
978aa140e543db0e3ee6441275f9ae356693728c
1051979 F20101203_AAAKVS kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_012.jp2
440f932ad8053b1e9e007f2756e7bb6b
a745ae669382bc07c6b687e3ac2dab334772bda7
F20101203_AAALCA kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_054.tif
e3512d2d3f37ce1ee3ada78e9042abf8
9a846e132d8989c2c7b53ac94df2236155ac71d5
F20101203_AAALBM kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_036.tif
ae97b48feb046ff33b4c07d694de5963
ba180755a1b3d42c6aaa8ccd96ecd5f146d43090
F20101203_AAAKWG kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_032.jp2
8a9304fdf25848a10e72253b8acbc1f7
e9747648bb6a2ccd7f329c811c2352c2feac7f65
F20101203_AAALAZ kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_021.tif
08d018c5c8bd869e4146b223736cdaac
7e02a83cd583931e09ed5087fd7b45401cf84e6f
F20101203_AAALCB kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_055.tif
bd4bfee92b888925f7ae670da78ac2c0
8ff6b3b047d18f29a6d78d283a5f0bfc2626e379
F20101203_AAALBN kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_037.tif
da88a2cac2314da4d8cf7173b6127734
f1e3261bdb7abf5d200e68a47039ad5f5274d33f
1051959 F20101203_AAAKWH kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_034.jp2
f9ec5dfb19f0946368002cad5964efc5
ebc35b10c972454c4691b7c187a35d660ea7dcf8
1039458 F20101203_AAAKVT kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_013.jp2
894f2afb33dd46ff6948568ec5f53416
1196abaa5487ccd9498c782ab231e2a8bfe827c3
F20101203_AAALCC kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_056.tif
f080be14f64db4fcfad1be283d62a06d
410d1e0905bb49d89d552c6e628d4311ae56c87a
F20101203_AAALBO kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_038.tif
55c41097798252c4e7159dbcd3242a4c
2dab8f31811200ba07553b0bca568f6293b52ece
1051974 F20101203_AAAKWI kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_035.jp2
e178afe5ed49a029fe90a1d35f7cd464
9a9c6b6a2cbc1417aa0228965378b20bb81bc13e
966089 F20101203_AAAKVU kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_014.jp2
28a3e3433fc07a0e5769e5f561443ce9
d29dd4ccff5bf661892a9fbe3a542e19d28ccc3b
F20101203_AAALCD kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_057.tif
be99096fca1ac8f46b1f1550b775b5df
1bed7ddb60843688ac1715dbb5f0483a6a26d921
F20101203_AAALBP kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_039.tif
94eab46352f3cf96eff6a931c2339cc2
7f7963da58e8addd9c26dc0b74e4e458e7baaf74
1051983 F20101203_AAAKWJ kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_036.jp2
61566242369b1d272d94e71f9ab62c94
c6d932ad6118e50dafc57dde856589132153ded2
1051982 F20101203_AAAKVV kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_015.jp2
878b4e77dd724eb1e2fc20508901a81f
d655fb88f4ed5e4990d508f7a2bad72d92f4b30b
F20101203_AAALCE kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_058.tif
e9ebb550fa46c165cf7673ad4b644ffc
2414db2cf4a27e75ab419d79e95590f2267ff53d
F20101203_AAALBQ kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_040.tif
27e2a8cfd4540b35aeb2ab14a30efb76
77156db118e4c9fc72c8d18945fe854bd405ddab
1051940 F20101203_AAAKWK kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_037.jp2
9cd93abbaaa2afe0e54dca0c32a4ca9d
d862ed4b8b6d25fc570328b996f8bff830ddb9c6
1051969 F20101203_AAAKVW kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_016.jp2
6d9989a5161f7fdf5fad018319fccdde
75e35560890375c228c8f6c6c1d5df421c89dc82
F20101203_AAALCF kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_059.tif
4ecb87805a2a285b62263e71020ec256
3f583abd991eb7f3002d258a5e6b12a30acb8c31
F20101203_AAALBR kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_041.tif
397ebe192ba4bc28f989f56bb82df71c
2e8175f89d1f63e076fdd75f0ffc9f69e981b7f2
F20101203_AAAKWL kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_038.jp2
854f84098fb6ace5651533314dba5bdd
f38cec0b727c10729052a7b1570b0048e18646de
F20101203_AAAKVX kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_017.jp2
17c25c1808b4fb51f187dd5f41d5071a
709a9918b6309147b575b122a039a722970ce5f9
F20101203_AAALCG kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_060.tif
a0ae5f0fa18c4104a4e11c6654ba7b93
fc7651fdf03acdb0037458028c9235324c688129
1051962 F20101203_AAAKXA kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_056.jp2
2ec02605e58ca7ef945ff88fedb1ef69
38e6c48fc10108a9db410ebaf1e0ebc545157688
F20101203_AAALBS kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_044.tif
da06a48e34e958deded1823859c65471
e1981cc0ca78879fd53ceab43c987b5b6f2bd0a2
1051950 F20101203_AAAKWM kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_039.jp2
e2e309f85b29149e9218c200c76870a4
a97000b1a851678fe142dea9b39be6a9e0f3058e
F20101203_AAAKVY kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_019.jp2
54184dc401ebe53852aecf9b6835f8d7
72052186028b43451aa0194b3c24c04ff25eb26f
F20101203_AAALCH kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_061.tif
e3329a4ca94a38fa465cc530c67555a9
83263aaaa5c849d2dea3a9cbda4b6d8db879ea41
1051911 F20101203_AAAKXB kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_057.jp2
f6c91abb58521af640681cee9a9dca13
ed063c911754d9027edefcecfc511988eab28bb3
F20101203_AAALBT kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_045.tif
9d693c61dd766228a3690406c5d5f63a
919debb80e6d09c5075c08185506983f49b8b20f
F20101203_AAAKWN kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_041.jp2
1e9b5ca2f4bc897fbedd7dfce8d00e5e
ccaf23a0dc1458c870bfa10249e48eccffbab98e
1051951 F20101203_AAAKVZ kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_020.jp2
21dbf5b6911f10d4a9458f132c66e307
781945d2d06326513cd50a7fd2d720d40fec021c
F20101203_AAALCI kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_062.tif
bf19bf42e2e45c102f2d543459122c1a
3e8c017e28292af46de469a60fcc86146dc015ce
1051986 F20101203_AAAKXC kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_058.jp2
a72e65ae225183acb5594359e2de838f
77217e5d9f8efcf09e9f2effec86e65987f3bc3a
F20101203_AAALBU kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_048.tif
2315e8f7898a5738ab8593d37b9e32b2
722ea079163124d2b05f2ffebdc49444e2a253e9
953960 F20101203_AAAKWO kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_042.jp2
80b390443e0b3a8f9d26f15a799bd4a2
011f255a98a892542eecc2fe8e4c9daf81af24da
F20101203_AAALCJ kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_063.tif
64de2a8447ad9c706f38b8c1a66b8a86
8ee6ff9ab44e74927dfb0703e06581ba0af99352
1051908 F20101203_AAAKXD kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_060.jp2
102239d3dba7ec9821788e4b6a7f85a1
d11aa17a88bd2243fb55a4e8502c0c446144adf6
F20101203_AAALBV kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_049.tif
ae7cbfcef22b7689232e686d81aeaaa7
1c3e161524cd18c1f60e6ddf925165ce03be55be
756096 F20101203_AAAKWP kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_044.jp2
a1593d1d7957e840a2a98a7815b27616
02af28133ff30145bd93f968c3295545f7381cd0
F20101203_AAALCK kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_064.tif
6219a1ce3481ec387d1a1f76e7f33379
05287503f349f23afc0888cb1304d487cb431bfe
F20101203_AAAKXE kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_061.jp2
762591636cb4e7151de30da59ab6ae29
04fab980ac454eb8d20446503ab89bb644ba53ce
F20101203_AAALBW kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_050.tif
7d8d07cfecf51ca27472850956a5fe53
152afa3a2bc64816c67342eb173a7437372229c8
F20101203_AAAKWQ kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_045.jp2
c93dc312a4e2ea512d465a17e6d1e355
5d05a11044e20308e30b832051ff759c393dcc99
F20101203_AAALCL kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_065.tif
85bc92e00a815a2cb6b95b41613a2cf8
d30871e06081b1ec49241ef54e0da8c946f9d290
1051936 F20101203_AAAKXF kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_062.jp2
360026d2f7b70ea1dd3f1cb53497e53d
ba8477b311bb123fb51a5710b1611015587dc29a
F20101203_AAALBX kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_051.tif
810bbf21fd59ef25fa3439e0ad0e61e9
a0f0c5e5e677312f88b42a51c70bef4a23ac385c
624927 F20101203_AAAKWR kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_046.jp2
20faf5613f9505c2b349dff6b82f02d5
972164e4c4f24fbd1170f4f6d8ad85bdf3ebb0c9
F20101203_AAALDA kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_087.tif
b5361ab9b811b0dce9c3be2e8313fb32
0a2903499a28e8d7a97426e082225411ea4bd569
F20101203_AAALCM kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_067.tif
f293a0306b8cbe144e9c00a26422f289
591d62b8341d14bffd7631b9e99b54ec86278a36
F20101203_AAAKXG kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_063.jp2
4b313d73ff16835e9f7a27e8d2189372
a1a66d86591c0d9d92941f6bcedabc80fcab2138
F20101203_AAALBY kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_052.tif
4ae35b4f360fddcdf945383d7bcae61e
3b43d3f04afc8722eeb6a8a70681cc9f428d3336
626732 F20101203_AAAKWS kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_047.jp2
325f6a94c25b31d28b57d8c905d7ac7f
bd5fcdfc0f054b79ce895748522e0bc230bbe784
F20101203_AAALCN kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_068.tif
13d60538b96a9cd14f238f96a859781d
4a011b161ccbd3d8605394c353e5f2c602142996
353406 F20101203_AAAKXH kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_064.jp2
0870cf41cb4a6785aafa86d026d20f1b
9359a6516f036936fdf54e134d3e9ff6ab93c20b
F20101203_AAALBZ kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_053.tif
2b307542d041000a5c7106930334303b
0e4ee288ade6767972df7b9d6432d22f3139fc16
847925 F20101203_AAAKWT kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_048.jp2
4aa4adfbcf45dd348e20a8e6424d1f0a
d16adccd023f8a7cd555c4ac2bcb6859c1dfcb38
F20101203_AAALDB kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_088.tif
36d6d4dce26dd9c6791290a6be0507fb
9d8c0316ac8edb15a2a5dda35c5ae8dcf3028d4a
F20101203_AAALCO kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_069.tif
74f2b9702d10be7fda065d3a55f91239
3a1b47a2a9f648a3ccf979a4722e08fa879906a6
635231 F20101203_AAAKXI kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_065.jp2
ec8ef0252bac460292d6d3f88520a6f3
5a2dfa63543c3531c2baccade342c97ebb380907
F20101203_AAALDC kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_089.tif
33a001ae605bf740740a2e4a6077bec8
6d72d01d23312e42071972b8c237b6ac04afd1ec
F20101203_AAALCP kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_070.tif
c93110778164bdf88edcc98e9fb5d5df
2f35e153d1503ba38795eb5dfdce6454917b443a
722320 F20101203_AAAKXJ kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_068.jp2
1749aedeae84b2b525b05ea3a4351fdc
792c2c4fabf7363577a9dc05a3ad4836f52947b5
F20101203_AAAKWU kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_049.jp2
8b1c578e4ce73bf9ca01433236dd8547
77532934f086ab0dfd714136aed756ff32d885a0
F20101203_AAALDD kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_090.tif
cf3f7686f074b37acf17daf759eb3e22
b56d61ee4c34b8135f72ae6ad43df45f91f89b98
F20101203_AAALCQ kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_071.tif
3a2423dc008e75c7f16c596eeba72683
a6c2ac06a30e181310aae262374cbe08a3ac3f47
379534 F20101203_AAAKXK kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_069.jp2
673769c1c5f894ca9630481a35b64a73
5486de998fbfe945135e7372eeaf272c24cb9b69
F20101203_AAAKWV kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_051.jp2
fe245e08df3a4fc963c1f8d2eabfd65e
37b5b16751240f387ebc629520049fd4e13da560
F20101203_AAALDE kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_091.tif
df7364ea998497469f601ea5617ddfb9
93136a927b2e216fffdfd2705eaaaaf5d09defcc
F20101203_AAALCR kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_072.tif
8fc595a837d571fa2df65101b05c6aff
ec27885086d819f69eb0720c43157245c0a44b52
1051958 F20101203_AAAKXL kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_070.jp2
fa919a6d707926267cf75f76535eb272
ab222a0a944122c5f45173ae7278345ac2142956
1051973 F20101203_AAAKWW kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_052.jp2
3d53cdb503e74a504f94f703297e00a0
6372c32a3957eaffd8af97070bafbc3a8fcb3dcc
F20101203_AAALDF kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_093.tif
e8dac2ab61d05580abc799b2f6915438
92c8998c7b212a3aaa26da215bf12a11f98f62c0
F20101203_AAAKYA kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_091.jp2
71cfb13aa5b36fe53bca58421358385d
7f01af6989c5e52362b780414d6de64a972bf045
F20101203_AAALCS kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_073.tif
ead6d9d6e9c38b890fb97d112dd2166d
f585509680a2d4e019b6b0e9afe7cf1ad60185bf
F20101203_AAAKXM kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_071.jp2
06b35693a774e617523d624f7eef330a
910efa0afc409c1e16c66e284e63e8518a523b00
F20101203_AAAKWX kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_053.jp2
e746a66ef04ceb09507945453db9ddee
1d81278cb32d1c3483a527be5579f5f06ceb469d
F20101203_AAALDG kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_094.tif
83181b0dde0e0008e9cfb2c2b3b8712c
f2374a933b3e28fecbf834509d7e058310850f84
F20101203_AAAKYB kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_092.jp2
d0798a36ef06f4bf2fb651d2ea89c45a
02cf42b8acfc1127d3a022b7c6397d47d47204fa
F20101203_AAALCT kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_076.tif
b7f3fe9244f98b115c29d1a283e4ed51
9df2ec9e7ebbc7d2d48c8b889a3285d1bef2a9ab
F20101203_AAAKXN kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_073.jp2
de65b770f398ec5ef71f255f72168e60
a5b3cfa89f451fe7665bb3411d20a2ac9d6b3d9f
F20101203_AAAKWY kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_054.jp2
0a5daf0a674bb224d6a6f292fe4ca481
ceea0a66c9d955e46664b6c275383c6b7128d918
F20101203_AAALDH kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_095.tif
cb9364e852c0c47c9903564bc016dcc9
a293edc6a12e4dc66e6ece1272589b6f340e4ea4
F20101203_AAAKYC kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_093.jp2
34c0a1569c9d5cb6a8a40c473ae5c332
a7a89d3055a209a59ba993a457d0fe2acfc104cb
F20101203_AAALCU kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_077.tif
4ce92f4cb088b8e76c2264b755b0cb22
4d0177ceb2ac1d1298357eb35a9085a26f841b52
F20101203_AAAKXO kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_074.jp2
26ad4f28bdb6e2e3bf8a44374bb2112b
a9239351d4f40b8e9e1a985b61a68fab0118afc1
F20101203_AAAKWZ kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_055.jp2
d6034f0a7f35d7fa988fcad54c4a6e91
d946b37f40a9d4b0b011996b50fa50610b9ebe21
F20101203_AAALDI kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_096.tif
0c0b0b662af7cbb2d3e57e54369fca7f
523d75f09e2a9d72973d26756a58b60ed92d5797
F20101203_AAAKYD kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_094.jp2
45c4fde34dcce69c5e8b2b1d010e0095
6a1cf8e50003fe2b7a71f5b5f49156013aa7cdd4
F20101203_AAALCV kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_078.tif
77c569e5cffac1751cbd304528cb22cc
722b03fca9abce01fda0dd925555bd501c2b116d
F20101203_AAAKXP kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_075.jp2
c16e83bae00348a452d2b821cbd4a9cc
daa12f5e0e983b2f87ca82edc88475666a04b2cc
F20101203_AAALDJ kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_097.tif
f89cbcdde1372d90eee6494e12c085a3
9abfd64283a15d3f288d046f08bd61b0c33ac82d
F20101203_AAAKYE kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_096.jp2
6fed02af4da549848e25f4e4268dceac
a5e312003c21755b719582aa3850a72d9b74cdd2
F20101203_AAALCW kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_079.tif
5d7ee73e6cde8b3492391c5733593094
cadd5c676e15c665170e26514968f64973225dad
1051938 F20101203_AAAKXQ kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_076.jp2
80f469286aa0e7060cd1893e3016c7cf
559c827e7c83c51262be2acb0d5fce2976ec2186
F20101203_AAALDK kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_098.tif
60e5e0a5b0a13176d1c64d08d11f3c43
5ea5b65b894a0ef00e4784a055b5fb96ab9b4dca
F20101203_AAAKYF kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_098.jp2
1bd76daaccc40e6e40db89797b1dd480
adce413af41c8fcad9f19be60c23ecbce0c79b45
F20101203_AAALCX kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_083.tif
d53b2eff421c44cba4bba573e8483cd0
7a1d8f3693d74888a32502c41bbdfd6cc1ae3cf6
F20101203_AAAKXR kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_077.jp2
26503073f8231dd53122e9bf91f57dd6
18427a1c97fd866302e2d2e2f741d8a3295fc45d
F20101203_AAALEA kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_117.tif
573a42f583a495e1895355cf1f061d0f
ca4ebbec0ac464f2a611ee4b9f2ad070af846c97
F20101203_AAALDL kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_099.tif
f400af7fe6ba41f18ceb4ef2953a061f
7a1799a722dd6925a6a0a66058af8185cc088f3e
F20101203_AAAKYG kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_100.jp2
2e9136da735113957b4610a2855d2bd3
bf3b64cd4830464ac93df6eab6ecc47e2efe5766
F20101203_AAALCY kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_085.tif
77d417cbe37f8cd4f7010b1446bfb872
fe973b96b31640beaa640682f0f333e2f67519f7
1051910 F20101203_AAAKXS kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_078.jp2
b0eecfb4638a086f895d6adb7736af41
e94592203b66e304695b5f731bae89afb1229f5a
F20101203_AAALDM kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_100.tif
b4871e3945918027e7e85f410be10c15
7784b9e1239aa864ccd7d5b4a3d3fc88f626e591
1051967 F20101203_AAAKYH kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_101.jp2
5e2bc122f0023bef678bc2237260ba6a
d4a3d29795d452bbdb03743f147ada9b9809cc12
F20101203_AAALCZ kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_086.tif
f055bfcefb227555ef1bc4b141a99da2
d4091f2fcdf187041f96850092e5098ee5666a94
1051921 F20101203_AAAKXT kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_080.jp2
5b30ec27e099a10b81f96366cf193e5e
37918c156065f190e22b6c26e374a81479a852ed
F20101203_AAALEB kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_118.tif
cd31bc236dae57a216233c0802e2f4d9
11402172f0b4457139b3d0f0edb6429124f20a59
F20101203_AAALDN kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_101.tif
4315ef70b526015d3f44eab5d627ef87
56a7e1e03259516cb0993649fa1e0c7144a51950
1051925 F20101203_AAAKYI kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_102.jp2
41f47643dc57c129f650f46a65b20b54
5feeee131ba818bdaf2acfdedd38e65c505dc2da
F20101203_AAAKXU kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_081.jp2
d59bf21c7b7fe98c890cbfbe7f817fa7
8269c4216de3023acaa16a0d8ffcf0701554f926
F20101203_AAALEC kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_120.tif
1f94208a8d134dd353357b4f60ce32bf
309d78734669a2ab20220b3ab3822f52087c7f29
F20101203_AAALDO kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_103.tif
ce4f32eec5ae393d1015cd7639217ae0
f5376ad4c2660f347cb666d9e647134c49bb363b
F20101203_AAAKYJ kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_103.jp2
777faba0d406866006a45cee5939b8db
7249066c4f2722af8b73263d38371ef0531164fc
F20101203_AAALED kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_121.tif
46a78cb83e8d1c7c12973058feef3268
a237cc83cf0a9c29faac9712c8f6c4c7f3971b77
F20101203_AAALDP kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_104.tif
9dbd8bb06154a7b0a3c2932dd21e89cb
83002b4a312199d4a7e307c2496798a83e3236e7
F20101203_AAAKYK kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_104.jp2
87290041e2774a6f901e293d8b19a2cf
405cdb685356af9d0a9259d49e7878acfea533e9
94957 F20101203_AAAKXV kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_082.jp2
0dbc4961f833a93bdb955ccec33d50c4
4d0c4efcc6518c1250a714a40ab555aeb911682c
F20101203_AAALEE kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_122.tif
d1bddd4ca1e6f34029b5b2ae2cd257c9
4ee3a124bea13aa747fc45129236fe429b365dc1
F20101203_AAALDQ kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_105.tif
7428f01c92132fa026c2acdc7742a968
6d9abcf847da7eaacb933aeb4ba386d75f585df6
87454 F20101203_AAAKYL kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_105.jp2
e663ee9441a5cadb53fefebc39913b4d
51909e3403b27c9f8fa74af32dd17d7112527b59
553416 F20101203_AAAKXW kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_085.jp2
6242d4a9c99cf855e74d0cbfa459012a
10fd61472c9ae23253a46c8d4fcb65b34fb10f3d
F20101203_AAALEF kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_123.tif
d5a915719cdbc8474f7b3fb9207f02d6
6dbc23c631b1bb145cb5104d2c0eee6f547c1055
F20101203_AAALDR kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_106.tif
511c673fa5168c3dcf532652954db0a8
6be08886160689e36fa1d8f76c4c47d22ec96dc6
795731 F20101203_AAAKYM kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_106.jp2
6f741bdb25c7db3f4ddf03521772c388
fc7308ca3ee55674aa15ffa24ece54dbd92a1cb5
806931 F20101203_AAAKXX kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_086.jp2
085c92b17f938ac7f92a13799e30c7af
2d587e52520ac85bac14a4cb8228a9694c2c5e1e
F20101203_AAALEG kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_124.tif
7f13af6d49b3df4f994aae26631b3517
d205b745c3f4b5bda8a9abfa2eb2340649a1bbf8
1051966 F20101203_AAAKZA kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_123.jp2
292d86e1aa6600f0a5b5714479df066b
322354507b7213fb76d4b771e684608c25cfe149
F20101203_AAALDS kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_108.tif
d6e30dc8378d851a72304f51620f83d5
4e8d52dd6b6d298439d1e23ae06527e85d8c901e
858025 F20101203_AAAKYN kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_107.jp2
9a743ab83391c984d16213e3590e060c
bcdeb0921d5b278c87c81c8a000bd9425fd4ae44
F20101203_AAAKXY kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_088.jp2
87434b30c2c0cc531311dd2078396767
f3e589fd436ca82454faf2d36f0877a4c55c4319
F20101203_AAALEH kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_125.tif
0547377f184fdcc2935c8f97839b5a72
9be66025020d8cef7aefc40c52a9871fc9ef54e1
F20101203_AAAKZB kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_124.jp2
04eeaee6b9740c6eb100d87bcaf4fcb1
6b1467c22a8b9349f68cf1a81aa1e7313e92fa61
F20101203_AAALDT kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_110.tif
e3b0ca0872d5fd5d2957c4fe7edbd2ed
283b8a6ac9e1f8a0e9064c96eb9ae9eedf430eb8
807051 F20101203_AAAKYO kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_109.jp2
d712c147eb3935a7e687ca5ba3acaa3e
a4b94674b593554e4faa6dde6c342b8cb0e5e9b8
F20101203_AAAKXZ kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_090.jp2
f4af9bf94def6225eee070d54626f9ac
2f5beea10560e4b9deed7fb4eac7a8658c65adb1
F20101203_AAALEI kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_127.tif
9f965d8bd904fbf88aab0faa58902e9a
52a5ac7de2f7ab685f8a01f0809acd1ced19a491
1051934 F20101203_AAAKZC kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_125.jp2
17081643abc38f3f1f21d63cbacfd25e
0d8d12534e7b785ae3488961e157c3659d714ad6
F20101203_AAALDU kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_111.tif
a0d42c7e520a11ecd518dad83271cff0
99ad75a0c7649f99810f1e77ca04bac7e8bc1231
908908 F20101203_AAAKYP kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_110.jp2
9fd48c607dbaddccc0a304b508999b77
062bb5727cda0f8315ca6eddcfb6126faaf3eac0
F20101203_AAALEJ kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_129.tif
b0877aeecf052f28712ab5e2799022b7
a23b636ff0793940c9248cfc5d9e0145a532e6e0
F20101203_AAAKZD kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_126.jp2
2e7c3fd34dea7637a71d852e5c41fe4b
52cf9f0d09377b7fece0f51ad475b5f3efb5ac38
F20101203_AAALDV kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_112.tif
1e6d49ada0d4a2dcdeda98195e3e878b
f0df7bf7a1a209e8ae254cac78a26a157fdc3deb
555918 F20101203_AAAKYQ kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_111.jp2
aa8e39eb9b83275d55066fd48c4d8b2c
4bb58321e58da729cca86a5b9d25b201ac214add
F20101203_AAALEK kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_133.tif
0b7556884c395df18e0ef058a0957fc9
8313799f14a6defbb438a17133613e661e27bfae
F20101203_AAAKZE kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_127.jp2
a51bc7d9dcce07cfbe50167cd84eb8f8
df7f31a0ba7b25ab78db4e074e385a33dc796138
F20101203_AAALDW kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_113.tif
0215b101d8e90ec4394d69d57fc6e695
ad4208b414e3924566f07fe31d083ae21546f5bd
F20101203_AAAKYR kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_112.jp2
9ffe4ec0ea8f41cd3a012b3f4d54dc06
c38ab62ef413718e24ce1329f41267b01911cec4
F20101203_AAALFA kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_155.tif
907147242036bbd3325b20e38198266b
a1264c55a6cde52b7acbcf0d268993fd45a0280e
F20101203_AAALEL kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_134.tif
bf5eb51e98ae3420f2093ff5d48c1c71
0ffd0981a8a78bbad1ec2c7f402a766c34988837
1051960 F20101203_AAAKZF kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_128.jp2
56793b783c1ed46648395c162787cad5
049c3d6ac62d1dc617c168b2121ba69b3bd59751
F20101203_AAALDX kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_114.tif
0d39a43be9840eb402551e0190a01163
89ab0d71a024ef5bb39195d1edd82d02c6587ae6
1051923 F20101203_AAAKYS kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_113.jp2
042de8057802b02d08dddc5a3595e427
291b3c5825169a53e4264b0ccf35a7d82067dfbb
F20101203_AAALFB kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_156.tif
7c9fa4c595286726b3337f5055822ec3
2775b0cdafeaab8c24055aea3cb116d9d356942e
F20101203_AAALEM kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_137.tif
dd666b2b6e3549e9cb2f872378fed7f9
cb13b2501e76c4202c9ca3d45db8f81709f8cd17
905770 F20101203_AAAKZG kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_129.jp2
fd987ba5707bc00a7c5c67d186f90001
532748dcb57795d39d791a54e97a0d3ae71938c2
F20101203_AAALDY kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_115.tif
1ef2e0b0e326883e067c797fd02607e4
0a58809ac6cdc677b3242de426a8e7a9747b383e
F20101203_AAAKYT kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_114.jp2
d90199733aaeeee5c3cec7223a8391d7
4f9da1d003a5b0c8f2a128694f14c406d238a18a
F20101203_AAALEN kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_138.tif
9af8f1217d3c3534adef2fa325565fa0
fc12b6fc694df25f394ddaa1c8c5fe2c05e384b3
792796 F20101203_AAAKZH kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_130.jp2
2da207733b134d8f37738bde49c6124d
833dd0fc5a82219eaa6b53258d9b4cc7acdd6194
F20101203_AAALDZ kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_116.tif
727f7e58e7608ff5e09b46bfaca58409
add5177b3e542d36e7736f761825dc1fae76abdf
F20101203_AAAKYU kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_116.jp2
9aa41a3bba70bd766c61c62294d99905
eb402048deb258347adf7e6683c057e7708c55c4
F20101203_AAALFC kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_157.tif
7ccd96b799ac80edf1fde327f8058989
39352526b0c1fea98d413aacbe9613b75ddd82d7
F20101203_AAALEO kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_139.tif
bd73440085563622b4d2a2e5c6ca0bea
551a4988abc0a7e176014e6378f48b99c8bac0a2
941297 F20101203_AAAKZI kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_131.jp2
9d5c6c3ec0b5a0fbbfd9e6451236f638
060cd81dd1b58f1766fff56f67cdfc5481af685d
1051924 F20101203_AAAKYV kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_118.jp2
5ef6165b0840d506f04546233658da19
3c38f9fe968b2a1919f9e7f4f8bdfd4b84fac908
F20101203_AAALFD kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_158.tif
00c5add274a0c10a3829f576703ad722
22e5fc77a9fb523a67b99c3b70e965305b2c1402
F20101203_AAALEP kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_140.tif
5f00f1f3fcd1cdc90f00cf1d213ebb4d
0b5e9e2f5d57cf24b1c6c3626b2bde30c2a2b8bf
F20101203_AAAKZJ kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_132.jp2
c39736844dddc598465efef66d64b29e
83332a1f9286a6e0ac46ec7f5aaa463885ec9edd
F20101203_AAALFE kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_159.tif
1b856811221c32bf38ac22bf6a333aa3
5108b7e1e981ce314f724b84e214a867df60a2f6
F20101203_AAALEQ kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_141.tif
c0051d578be68dc73c232e6d4c2cbaad
7c773c37542930d12cd1e08ecef11c64a933d9bd
F20101203_AAAKZK kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_133.jp2
553dc169c6d7be884602e9e64975765f
8af2809f138b3d365edbd0ab11f5072f35ac89b7
F20101203_AAAKYW kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_119.jp2
87438a249ecad9ebdbc8582e475cd1a4
f01153559f56d0c504c7d469106d74b3941bde95
F20101203_AAALFF kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_160.tif
4ea7026bd39b175a9ee596d9e75b810d
eb3d6eb7dcd36b434181e9fafa719d6a475cf5a2
F20101203_AAALER kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_143.tif
6b50491790c7c7ce61fc97897da5a6e6
2d757c330db4e6669e60beb49e0fd16be6883a19
788775 F20101203_AAAKZL kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_134.jp2
ec52c8a38d062c7011b1060b18037ee2
2fb83979ab2203ed085dd9d404265ca90026f696
F20101203_AAAKYX kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_120.jp2
e1a00bd517b949679efe170139dfb681
660a731fb28ee241fd71666276cb6fa01de68422
F20101203_AAALFG kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_162.tif
ca80c3dbab2cbc532302665396062c96
05fffd1dcda6829331c14fdf6377cc187e8d3bb2
F20101203_AAALES kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_145.tif
07b3881e5d8cab4f572ad85248738749
c9b581b54542da2e57af71c80fe97c00d23e2bca
839546 F20101203_AAAKZM kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_135.jp2
29984968cf936e9748a12655e6a90f75
373b3366db70108bb4f5b35a6bb819dd7ae6d3f5
1051922 F20101203_AAAKYY kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_121.jp2
9440a95a0ebd3d862866c8a1e6e2271e
68106bbe57feaf8717b7a67d8f674e41037972f7
F20101203_AAALFH kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_163.tif
26964d3b0bbe211421a37eaf57b34315
ffe8e08f5fde7cdf6ddfea5b1fdc7e8c8b68ad29
F20101203_AAALET kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_146.tif
af4271ce2cb15a63d6032daf3d929c28
cfcb4ac2265e66177b85968aa1b1c75cf45e0ed5
887392 F20101203_AAAKZN kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_137.jp2
bbc229bf55dc02296638516178016f75
82c764dc67eca5089550e60082da175806175f8d
F20101203_AAAKYZ kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_122.jp2
a674a04e4995e9f4f94d421abbcd8339
41e3a1098bf5436d5e6562423f12d5034f8adc7f
2540 F20101203_AAALFI kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_001thm.jpg
dba10155dff96e96bc3f8e5981f7e495
833f789e4d44f26e05a4e649b6140f9327cb6177
F20101203_AAALEU kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_148.tif
4c94b2afb895bcb4b9d450993cdd433c
2ac97cc6ea547f8a0293da4637cf4daacd1fdc6e
F20101203_AAAKZO kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_138.jp2
2ee10e97f353e323514fce6e016fc545
7cb04d414bd85a86c9022899245e88c76f28f3f7
6996 F20101203_AAALFJ kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_150thm.jpg
58302f0c59561bc28df42191447c4ebc
b896b15923bf2de119b72531380fa0db5d8f94a9
F20101203_AAALEV kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_149.tif
102bad4b85720bd8f497f350ae49f7b4
e0d35087f58285e79484a0734ecc7ec42d12d646
F20101203_AAAKZP kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_140.jp2
86e375e665f636c55e366df72639ea3e
d71770831d4334bc6cec3c9c985fd31d1b09df3b
5573 F20101203_AAALFK kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_138thm.jpg
5c9c27526edbe232c360dbb6371362f1
32734fbb66a36e4c32f0f47e3a3d982f3b78d023
F20101203_AAALEW kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_150.tif
70f6f04cb25fe811f40e6fd484ba3623
b107d357982f5b271dadf5c7534326d06813632d
F20101203_AAAKZQ kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_141.jp2
217ca80bba212bbdffb9f1927dbee13b
58223d3d8b6bd1d8da0d53dca8884f8f33884f6f
7503 F20101203_AAALFL kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_079thm.jpg
0489da8fadd3899919ffd29e80b072ba
4643946e0f5322589839101b656875c7a70fcdfb
F20101203_AAALEX kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_152.tif
0ef13c3e169ffc5c4ca56276ab0b34f8
096858173eea201525f6fefd52ce104a8194ab14
1051931 F20101203_AAAKZR kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_143.jp2
949e434b1cb1060fbf8076a717997ab4
57ea83ca39ea08f7d5eacdc7eca1c465bd9ec6d8
24913 F20101203_AAALGA kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_159.QC.jpg
68e372d343ff973abd3eee400b380fdf
168dcf20715a2e91a99ca1e619d8c24d438c46d6
7281 F20101203_AAALFM kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_076thm.jpg
f36d05c84bd7e4cea486e3d5f1f6f168
c69a942468f204ac39fd85e85c6de60e4e6591fb
F20101203_AAALEY kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_153.tif
111ed453aec4c6270f9fb387c747301d
f9e38dba2fc0a9f1b8a74b574d62b7dc917292f3
913603 F20101203_AAAKZS kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_144.jp2
3dfe957cf5c6e9a9b048994c926038fd
4d0ed43fa3a8a3c304ac61031f7989cd7f15a39f
14501 F20101203_AAALGB kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_044.QC.jpg
ced9eda574f035d9e814c2d7302fa330
e67145dce9a7ad37a9c28a4f174ff9536a80372e
7090 F20101203_AAALFN kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_011thm.jpg
2b10172472f22a0e8040cf23dab2c239
c74b3bd8c55492a8a7f6dbb61d3cd81fd0f24661
F20101203_AAALEZ kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_154.tif
4d052b96d54e1cb88d7b78e0617a8434
71caf60d5257cd5560a5394813f56e5fbdbcb228
1051856 F20101203_AAAKZT kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_145.jp2
10ef05ad6b959c47c2168c13151f1ef3
d3b2ec4f6efeaac19efd1ed191a840822dd7795b
27236 F20101203_AAALGC kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_033.QC.jpg
09da98c0a57f1f25f4b0d55ac0ec9dd0
d3c891db7c15a31559fb6f88508e5f29cf1729d1
7635 F20101203_AAALFO kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_091thm.jpg
b3c71d7a7b39e31ee016617796bab90e
06cb74c193bd7ca79252de6c289449d3d04da4fd
F20101203_AAAKZU kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_146.jp2
e6a67383c12f1eba14b91d79d678a9f3
b4135fea7720dec3aaecc62dc042cabb9fbbe902
7363 F20101203_AAALFP kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_116thm.jpg
b48acc83009755fc52b6716c6a1b91f7
a9074d9662c28a772f12971596ee90231e264b77
F20101203_AAAKZV kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_147.jp2
599f6a6f7f4ff86eac9a2e10f1459646
76010a178404628f831af916434ccf8a50499dd5
21553 F20101203_AAALGD kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_146.QC.jpg
e44d271c7602747243b3ee7d66770c6b
9530146ccb1d42e3a3210b29eecbb297d6bcf8fb
14513 F20101203_AAALFQ kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_107.QC.jpg
6fbf7bc3cde5610c929abbb2cb5003a0
8165cb801a62859842d99c6ab25f1360af47c36c
F20101203_AAAKZW kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_148.jp2
c7a9b41746fa52bcc8701eb3aab96b17
f084d0cea23c9056205a8fcf1b4c950a3d7e44ef
7587 F20101203_AAALGE kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_101thm.jpg
6dce64515f357dc4d157ccc2baff869d
3cb1ead7f56806417f542869a84153f7102c7544
7393 F20101203_AAALFR kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_033thm.jpg
347bea4caf9cd1566c3e9a69bccc612b
716b7b75936b4c50dda098c88bb403fdbb9fc094
6968 F20101203_AAALGF kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_115thm.jpg
f080d5e105f4573af7dae2bc2424524e
f582135f6513a89b4012cd23d5e3ecc07a2ab907
6265 F20101203_AAALFS kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_108thm.jpg
6ffd438c6d349e7e4c6332485875d204
7d8b11074b5bf85fa26a35a8216a5de9308ed077
F20101203_AAAKZX kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_149.jp2
904d9b5a0af299b976881ead76e70df1
40532829873959d2670c4cf3b4661ea394e16dd0
27763 F20101203_AAALGG kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_099.QC.jpg
2ef8c9d1bc580842642d75b61c237253
2bb53319c7f4af7c1431033875b056758df58e16
3364 F20101203_AAALFT kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_002.QC.jpg
78efedd6ac0a2fc9f60ee9e90a071d58
bd0063e7e6d621713caaffbe7ff4c00f84527a37
F20101203_AAAKZY kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_152.jp2
787e351b7c655571e1154718b7aab23e
d8ea17f1888db4d4591bce0e8f884a638ab136a7
13560 F20101203_AAALGH kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_043.QC.jpg
74e0e5ec9bff4b77f20cd98af79a8964
c8eca112cdcc0c3463cc7304bf2eb55b19cf7f90
27280 F20101203_AAALFU kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_094.QC.jpg
d5d0914858d71906af7ac09a47d1dc38
e2f734b528bf694714bc20224a7165bff943cc89
F20101203_AAAKZZ kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_153.jp2
71addc6c2a081ee4a07ff2e22799d9b7
9b798d0033f30dd9a2e7be7f48e6ffe08e224fa7
4946 F20101203_AAALGI kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_110thm.jpg
d62806e22417f708a61500c7dd0fa51c
1d9abc21991dff0b95e1846c3630bebdc7489887
27724 F20101203_AAALFV kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_076.QC.jpg
f0921fd4ff9e8b41d968fcbbaa76fcc5
fa67eabf5d6355b9c7a38a0e6f0f5f416d501dc5
27255 F20101203_AAALGJ kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_128.QC.jpg
76889722c602e5d83cecd004fc11f8b7
0844d562e042e38dc05af81cc943194900938e42
26093 F20101203_AAALFW kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_090.QC.jpg
d81704f9f877aacb4440875e33aecbd0
e2f65d91602a39342b351a61bcc433599be7c393
27291 F20101203_AAALGK kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_029.QC.jpg
5bc0d06700f3e0f75873f9f7895ff5f7
cd334160d0f003fc9a80b1e18f6c8789f4ae1e9d
7031 F20101203_AAALFX kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_007thm.jpg
66d2d2580c4d8de0db8dfef42d306bc5
13c3131f880200f70a9a8ba1f39ab0b383e79e88
27664 F20101203_AAALHA kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_158.QC.jpg
db077b15e34518c66a8d362e83ddf6c7
5fe574a9e60361f11d039c85c9948bb23675d0e4
6580 F20101203_AAALGL kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_018thm.jpg
742dd9c569437b55407b00e565ae8b04
695bc39b89b207751ecb6cb991123ec844f9dcfc
7502 F20101203_AAALFY kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_035thm.jpg
0cf0c129247cd0bd04f3230f14ef09ff
4eb2e267f409e793d21769a73bf28aad3d9beaf5
5079 F20101203_AAALHB kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_144thm.jpg
740b2daf60c8c9b3cec2c26e78450bde
8f819b32c0bcf55551ba81cd32dde386b383487a
21421 F20101203_AAALGM kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_042.QC.jpg
fbf303056e909b2343720a45c730b40b
245c42c3ffc9f95d72c153fead19062f1247452d
27199 F20101203_AAALFZ kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_058.QC.jpg
8c05e206683d8cffd70d6c38850f0245
877dd8b8c7b8d16378b75cbb7442c525c75d49d4
7326 F20101203_AAALHC kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_040thm.jpg
75d164eb4cf2188e2d01e2ae3f4615fb
e8acd9601cff58affe6c614e74ebe6ed9c063c06
4122 F20101203_AAALGN kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_085thm.jpg
8fda29803a3a71f6cf3b44d3373a1730
dc958167e7cb5dd95497beada61ed2a41c526154
7261 F20101203_AAALHD kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_152thm.jpg
b094f4c85f5f7f6433dc9827758d1463
c6ddcf7abad7335e451bd234936ceb2668c8c715
17689 F20101203_AAALGO kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_086.QC.jpg
595734ddbb719f608454080b03b8de12
40cb10b86c29d05bdd7488d1ee84a95646fab8c3
7483 F20101203_AAALGP kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_096thm.jpg
ab190f8ce453c3c408a20a177df97e3e
e2a20df8a4362ecc80c7f84bf9d8f0bf57f440d5
21585 F20101203_AAALHE kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_131.QC.jpg
4632d53b653104ccaac01644807155d6
1d91a31f6d4a055b69ef4a0779ad15716873c179
7417 F20101203_AAALGQ kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_059thm.jpg
dc865157cb092eaba4f1e0bbe7fb8542
9b1877c7f038ae1fbcbd6c14f2fe0db8d4276697
7585 F20101203_AAALHF kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_149thm.jpg
5b65ddb18bac79d68c1e16ee1152a1ef
825e480a89636e7afa59711eb82551e9b68b1263
24977 F20101203_AAALGR kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_006.QC.jpg
7252c867c3a8d47fc4d66f04da0f3980
659a3eb0c16508711892f270ddf822c8ddc87535
27408 F20101203_AAALHG kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_100.QC.jpg
58eb94a70048fd86d33795222e487052
96eac56e7bf3368b79ea5632754a71dd59d72361
7408 F20101203_AAALGS kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_100thm.jpg
4330a26c2fb6010e5c65adcf22dc884b
8fe3075d39d2d258f92720ad5a0a4204e26694f4
20403 F20101203_AAALHH kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_132.QC.jpg
c97182d66c3e90a482aea71a15703ac1
dbdfe1098b0ed6e15953877911c62f9f6934e306
26718 F20101203_AAALGT kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_015.QC.jpg
991a9da8d5a701b78ccc8875a81dd861
a7844426b3fe460c622f09c9b681b8b4f030fd8b
7468 F20101203_AAALHI kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_093thm.jpg
cd67542eebea40c7dcec8fd562d509c2
c196e5460728f4c40d05bca1c8a9b3295fec0aa2
24398 F20101203_AAALGU kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_063.QC.jpg
22c49d0a28a0a6afe2694f31e42ca57e
61ed21419441ba25724bb243d35e7e89df47dfb6
7282 F20101203_AAALHJ kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_112thm.jpg
4b74b89f40f2a13ac3946e4e0ca7df70
e7a92387daf53db76d8d6c5ebd66a86d924b8e85
18546 F20101203_AAALGV kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_109.QC.jpg
d6f241e8bb2dc47403fd21545b0eb092
fb12bda575f5cc37c002711632665253c4078c6a
7709 F20101203_AAALHK kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_078thm.jpg
8447874a6b5634879e2d52d3fd652aa3
947433701e3b7246da0316a2fd739e472d9ce7f5
17394 F20101203_AAALGW kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_110.QC.jpg
9899a7b371e719e5de02888a0caa5c35
4c433233febce345f6dc0ad1007ac0612b4f1fff
25829 F20101203_AAALHL kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_150.QC.jpg
b4ef46b393618df5ea5d046b8c9889fb
5bbc936c3e5c82628af656624c86e142027fc211
6900 F20101203_AAALGX kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_054thm.jpg
3e37d9e3dbf8526936f85ac581da2dba
eaf99ffdc948094601033029c2da58011a41d0e3
6201 F20101203_AAALIA kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_013thm.jpg
f1b1ef1e3085e73fc8468b9747afb66c
515b751741acd2bf1421b7de4940b3f594b552a3
4006 F20101203_AAALHM kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_046thm.jpg
ce6906cc6d5a181d2edc6d3a85227943
b34ca66e7bb36dc2bc4e399df8badb1f24a52ba4
4340 F20101203_AAALGY kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_137thm.jpg
83f5b67409e8a3363d570d87e1c69fe0
74c7efed2b2c9afaf3cb778d877574bee229d651
7431 F20101203_AAALIB kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_074thm.jpg
3d9825b6471cb1d3898eca592639b4ec
42b7aaf7d93b2ac13055e784293cdb3573622c3f
7617 F20101203_AAALHN kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_030thm.jpg
dfe1f9ee118d80dbb2fd667cede38d02
76d3ed26fb3dcbdc9c1d46c5f6dffc90c96419d9
7459 F20101203_AAALGZ kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_039thm.jpg
f8af455ce86cf9f29cfd3f6a8601b1c2
455b272aee86073ca812794906241ee25864965b
3187 F20101203_AAALIC kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_064thm.jpg
15d5a4e7a9430392bf42d66d5e27f803
f334b2ed57bf9fc84b2b38751d8ce10a2f06865f
27862 F20101203_AAALHO kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_124.QC.jpg
eec2e1084f56bc0c7bf73e53c2e0ec28
de9dda10c2e8a18929b234f2d706e9067532d1fc
3592 F20101203_AAALID kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_139thm.jpg
6d655e94809f278d7054e8b100f3f7b7
0661d161e89f12fd764d0b86e0a093003c9ee59d
3986 F20101203_AAALHP kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_134thm.jpg
ad7237deaa6716a13f3ac98ccf549a6b
1c0de1f892c6e08889faf7c9a0ae8332c4cacaaf
13794 F20101203_AAALIE kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_083.QC.jpg
78eabb562e0f439b15bb9bfadd4ae962
44ce7b7fdbe2226f5f00b8424b62d5408c451779
6931 F20101203_AAALHQ kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_075thm.jpg
9f4782831e1052e0c7804594a541f960
9f2db1d2c722b2c9fb8b0ccf6602a79eb7bb306d
8490 F20101203_AAALHR kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_136.QC.jpg
09fe4c81a55eda410cf354c5f22fa9dd
4689049eeaca950c174149c554f217ff537ac8cf
4326 F20101203_AAALIF kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_043thm.jpg
1eedbb693477b2799300d9ade0eb71da
89b75063f7c7b00422d4f5e90ab4107e16f7c8f7
28648 F20101203_AAALHS kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_141.QC.jpg
a79f72428367aaa1ed5ecd838d5935fc
f6a98c4a791de69305b517cdf29ddd2eb0b16e22
7316 F20101203_AAALIG kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_102thm.jpg
48ff00da8987786257904a948274550e
141a2672f66d92519ef3d41013d9debfc15e814f
7547 F20101203_AAALHT kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_028thm.jpg
0a61e92f51d9018a35c15a7d95956b74
def43be0a6d70cd155aacc9dba4726e29872f346
27511 F20101203_AAALIH kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_059.QC.jpg
ebf60e45a07575e95c7e7bef76d8702f
961bc6ad6acb9685f56dace037fc642bad3522a7
18768 F20101203_AAALHU kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_045.QC.jpg
9ac4cd914e4ce6c2e90ef35edbd03eb6
9addbd8cb1f7298c3d3e16acbc4cc551914053d1
25362 F20101203_AAALII kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_160.QC.jpg
8d3cc4fe5dba34abf44756cce0bf6c1c
4b9423e71271422770036ab909b944e1bf1e11c4
28766 F20101203_AAALHV kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_101.QC.jpg
ef56d30738fab678339a7f06fe19eaf3
2cd242192ee0708462df2345cf493ca053c28766
7328 F20101203_AAALIJ kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_016thm.jpg
d00a440e85b831bb0eb27595214b4bde
c44e5c4713fea081ab67305039d629eb79b3f2c8
7085 F20101203_AAALHW kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_104thm.jpg
3e8a744577f44cb478b2f2eb2f22c623
b209c86bedec5a733c4fdd7ff303cef14ab803c9
2541 F20101203_AAALIK kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_162thm.jpg
cf85d56ebe46c8c85fb21f5272e72d2a
cdb7e8d7c6116984e3a3e1fc2e33f2a9c80b3e18
7357 F20101203_AAALHX kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_153thm.jpg
eaf031f4a414d45cd8d7da2b93a1cf26
6ad037257f4359e8fc2706e062191159214ec5bb
27090 F20101203_AAALJA kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_060.QC.jpg
3ff4acc2fe1119c932ad25fb582563e7
85b3cc625b9f00fb6a2fd8a3fc43319a5bab8e04
4529 F20101203_AAALIL kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_106thm.jpg
3dc98e913bdb8539c8aa1decfee7ed30
a68cb819c07120d64f09640d322f05e09ce5ee58
7466 F20101203_AAALHY kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_049thm.jpg
51a48cb3dcff730c3484582b4e6c3777
10bc3e11fca1057c331ae46530f14008e6631df5
26839 F20101203_AAALJB kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_062.QC.jpg
1d1e955bc03ebd9e4c89753f44d90489
bfa48c16e18b3614b4307f0b8ca6f7977eeaa77c
7377 F20101203_AAALIM kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_023thm.jpg
4a773e71e78cd40dc98907dac1c4034a
29bc2d36fd19ef4e47e4c5762008f32225332da8
3315 F20101203_AAALHZ kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_010thm.jpg
b0c5b307753f6f89e68672bf56ae0d18
bcd5e9d913f9e9efaaf2b7e75857c8442c5d3997
7175 F20101203_AAALJC kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_021thm.jpg
4056ece6ab7b70623d11c21c98bbe6cb
3374765bdae5c3a7821c72541c5ec38cc966802e
7667 F20101203_AAALIN kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_141thm.jpg
c71276fde70a265321dbbdb389476801
cb46c7bd68dfaeacdf3b9fbe9320bafc4764a04e
22195 F20101203_AAALJD kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_014.QC.jpg
6efd50bd3f46773d9535a0adf6abcc92
15a920ab038df58f4b4477a2e7249242261b39ce
7346 F20101203_AAALIO kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_060thm.jpg
f670795f94aa1f912222e78d5ca5eb51
8d6de135138ea7fc8db821cc0090e3a870808189
27122 F20101203_AAALJE kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_145.QC.jpg
d144acea550d76d1d23b1ba470b96a64
d90e990d45fdf69ee0fabdaa2b14ff391815e49f
3947 F20101203_AAALIP kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_068thm.jpg
fb24a844c821c506d7ddb62ea89edf51
2b9bf381c44485c2baef83143b85a10d4410c4d8
5847 F20101203_AAALJF kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_131thm.jpg
241f7dc94cfecf9d97bf5f20e671da65
c2ccd73fa42bfff69f9aa9b7de935718dd0a5bca
28484 F20101203_AAALIQ kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_035.QC.jpg
e8784b66d46754f393a61b3e2995a878
3a648ced016d01fd61c2b639f0464a0e488435dd
7463 F20101203_AAALIR kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_031thm.jpg
2b9ed3063f8650235c5900dd92b15d8d
03ed735a568f96e4ed364a6f87d9bb5baed03161
27035 F20101203_AAALJG kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_038.QC.jpg
eb28f553f04f29275c38c41ec2f0490f
36349e5a22e295dc9d4aef69e922aa68fd16952d
7552 F20101203_AAALIS kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_114thm.jpg
b9d6fe6637a03e3d43ca72b64c036c31
845b8b1cb69b2e385d56b703a46501dd87140b06
1530 F20101203_AAALJH kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_002thm.jpg
f1943d8398a54484367c38ffe1be89b8
ada405a551d81937dddca87f391f878f316b5363
14691 F20101203_AAALIT kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_012.QC.jpg
c376072596d5f692167acb556b54f2b0
4ab9478ef6c037261faaaec10d5801cf68f8b52e
5221 F20101203_AAALJI kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_105thm.jpg
628aa8dba7caef80fe69856def85b31a
a4bcefff1f4836ff0bd671be8b084176cbf46f2c
12795 F20101203_AAALIU kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_046.QC.jpg
af45c116333297ece439de38a456567a
0807a6e07a981977858007f9bf82a94e08ce694d
7224 F20101203_AAALJJ kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_155thm.jpg
f7aaddf15cd0d5548b9da133c9f4d87a
cb03a68da47470a90bb5f017216c387315bd5567
6793 F20101203_AAALIV kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_121thm.jpg
19a4c096607c3570373114e46fa9ed03
f00e87b84b83d4f8b46a38e43e8d3e4b6a095005
13259 F20101203_AAALJK kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_106.QC.jpg
b2430f5197fd39867d89d0ed21071772
f24e105aee3167ffebd35d414f13a065a1737750
4076 F20101203_AAALIW kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_083thm.jpg
b0b5d57bc21c68571e8182fa6ba9d7c6
eade11fcd89210b676ea615286130876080994a4
7540 F20101203_AAALKA kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_025thm.jpg
4d80bc73cd107e4b98dbd59efe5fdc94
691efafedaba5d223c4c80691942f24df0873078
17573 F20101203_AAALJL kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_066.QC.jpg
6eb2faaa87437bbd1f32e5f4dc38e507
a51357116c596e92c44f3407ed899f88b4c8b36a
6924 F20101203_AAALIX kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_143thm.jpg
c1b2108af1aede5512eed5e0a2073f95
7d7d87453c9f0b896dd86cbd3bd64e7b5aa486ff
4582 F20101203_AAALKB kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_087thm.jpg
926654911cd0eba9a3a7862aad7fe29f
146aedd667707ef916961a0f7108a74ad7a1a37a
7006 F20101203_AAALJM kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_090thm.jpg
98f83c86cdbf8d11efb2545d93ec5b7d
d24acf2aa41b3b3a2ad8dda6b5ff95889f6a6625
5779 F20101203_AAALIY kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_129thm.jpg
24513667e71e2e77332a3a69e8161f35
bdefe8ab9de6b7e452f660e344b0e5d86277b094
8850 F20101203_AAALKC kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_001.QC.jpg
970b2f3e873f12b26149d1fb67bfd770
9c9ade125475167ab1afd6d0ea3b69450aea606a
7342 F20101203_AAALJN kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_056thm.jpg
1f4b0c9e4ca59a65fa49cb9d2edce7a3
9d8074f84550c0c80eb38dd69111568754275aa5
7859 F20101203_AAALIZ kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_034thm.jpg
0339862af4b1c62da9ab425ff36ac144
d0079ea003abd74305be99b153e9122749cd206e
27652 F20101203_AAALKD kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_036.QC.jpg
2f8d8b80af88afea1cc5e61f16ae9778
3f926bbb1a4c3ff126b0a8357fce9041ebe35f2d
7465 F20101203_AAALJO kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_118thm.jpg
2742f7c6015fde6d945c5581bd7f86b5
ed5f629331fb0d18b9c58bb109ce7b9bc04ecef6
3989 F20101203_AAALKE kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_069thm.jpg
485a1339858e5beaa922b7e828d9161f
53ae06bfa8308164f8cbeb361d83fb824f60d6df
7345 F20101203_AAALJP kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_052thm.jpg
b011b572de3c388d64bd54befaa0c1e9
beba8a227ea4d15905e0c5390ae1e92c66a604e9
25496 F20101203_AAALKF kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_095.QC.jpg
90d346e59989fe4dc323264914c649d4
02170c0d85133ad6e06d865d9b52396ca3e9e04b
26721 F20101203_AAALJQ kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_152.QC.jpg
dab8fc76fe7ddf7765265262c015003c
d5a1a69fe08604155f9f6f2f68722f1aaccca919
26582 F20101203_AAALKG kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_055.QC.jpg
8e3c91368414f10463413038fe736c16
71f2c0aaf94bba966428c65ceb45eac25005456e
7729 F20101203_AAALJR kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_122thm.jpg
d2b067726b59710da06216d2cb8c70c6
c2c8b9fe503770c45b729ec37ed1c63bf4bbb6cb
29300 F20101203_AAALJS kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_078.QC.jpg
027359b45cefe638116f01617fdcecec
dad925fa3df236e42ffb896a50a53b8f4d9a888f
26158 F20101203_AAALKH kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_104.QC.jpg
23ddd3d9cb2578206e5c7a10590e0bca
2ce86429b659176a08dda86dba77c8d2d11e8c33
28368 F20101203_AAALJT kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_117.QC.jpg
2afaa13529d6ccc03b9f1561a40665bc
541177b04bce8db6c7db768a34bff7f423976ce1
3690 F20101203_AAALKI kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_047thm.jpg
cac4dfd553a0909ac8b2e18359d12dd9
dd41409df6f750cb3846291b36a38a0e8fc585d9
7771 F20101203_AAALJU kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_142thm.jpg
438136e15c060133f21eb0e88985f5f0
320cd1dc136dcbe7818023d037433b16ab9833bb
12258 F20101203_AAALKJ kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_111.QC.jpg
db7e974f019fe46098dceee25c968d42
bd8d1c8fa1177f5d7b88afd959547efe6d426ba9
25329 F20101203_AAALJV kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_155.QC.jpg
0d434bedbd7f27e45855defe32357bc7
d8c9a99939578b49e85920ad0f7e7cb6d6d306c2
14190 F20101203_AAALKK kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_137.QC.jpg
3bc5b6b9300bfdd292be262b03e0fb15
f96de6e59c036c5507598351269d0bf9781df50f
4680 F20101203_AAALJW kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_048thm.jpg
fb0b684925238ab9717b98f94c1df48c
28ae9aa3d163fe9bf1cfacba91322a2614d977ad
18837 F20101203_AAALKL kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_163.QC.jpg
1396b8de78ca1a360a40eccbc24a7051
ef87e7ce5c3996d8a668ad1b61d8572502353875
7361 F20101203_AAALJX kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_119thm.jpg
842eefbd05ce6565ed690f69aabd4e9e
a7ef6e86e94708c43e12464a0af1011250f8ef7f
7221 F20101203_AAALLA kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_038thm.jpg
5091cb57746a08d195ba541541b11875
135fcc820ac67e5255258300209e67ceb55c6091
27813 F20101203_AAALKM kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_118.QC.jpg
8fbbbd96875bfdad45e1aead28dc01c9
7cc14a7ffe711814c580a1751e932ce61170e8a5
26982 F20101203_AAALJY kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_149.QC.jpg
6a6a02a3b0267e5a06832f4d681e5809
7948db6f872191c71cc7104df58b684fc870901a
7389 F20101203_AAALLB kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_071thm.jpg
9402ce141ed559c6d1268a47e80a9efe
de959659a419f31adecec497bc90f55067607ef4
7472 F20101203_AAALKN kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_061thm.jpg
1bbced798157f49c318ec8a77bc8ce5c
86cc89a42bccc27df102ccb2e5de0af943093e01
23710 F20101203_AAALJZ kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_147.QC.jpg
744de8a690168e903cf3a73f5923af5e
3c418829489b3f9c53d1ecae364e8a4d64e6edad
7554 F20101203_AAALLC kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_004thm.jpg
386156ea56418e99b9ad3493fe98893e
fb470ff0d52808486900b8dcebfe8a83dfadc112
26741 F20101203_AAALKO kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_140.QC.jpg
36bbd1a29bbc7e1c9e4659a7adaad78a
55868ab3f327d2f9095e88f289c03a40e6ff70a9
5477 F20101203_AAALLD kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_045thm.jpg
d5136c9a10948fab7826bf4c53c3285c
6a5771159edc0eb9803b8822aead77e37dbc6d4c
4277 F20101203_AAALKP kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_009thm.jpg
4ef72555a38901aa50cf9ee6ba660116
9bbc8625e8f239cd06ce580d0ee4a03905b7df6a
17217 F20101203_AAALLE kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_144.QC.jpg
441b7fc49bcf0d2e4551ab5f5ffb8937
41455d811b2af28378fab5f0e3bfef90575fd24d
27493 F20101203_AAALKQ kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_005.QC.jpg
9185660d8fa2107e79c1d48b8e194816
e843a5a40e247b149bfeee200e06b6a463a56a1b
27969 F20101203_AAALLF kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_049.QC.jpg
febba9660738c3bb975899e07fb65ea4
00e52d31e9f12797a6c10b217292efdcb99ee4da
26458 F20101203_AAALKR kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_008.QC.jpg
129316d9a7654daeef86174d1539a023
36fe26e9d71a5f752140455d632c18759a2a82e0
27482 F20101203_AAALLG kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_112.QC.jpg
f0e5e796dc833987a7386fd64740427f
d04234f13a9fb6ac50426530c815b41b7457398b
6634 F20101203_AAALKS kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_008thm.jpg
b43c72ec789882994ca887281e661eeb
cda2d91fd8f33904170b61488abe8708ccfb00db
7369 F20101203_AAALLH kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_024thm.jpg
9d4e6d1b0081527baffb75c901b11e57
ba801a7f78a4b0a992710d96633b32de9cc9a616
27402 F20101203_AAALKT kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_096.QC.jpg
dcce323e555c7db6c81b925d764a6efe
1ca510aa49a2c6babe521f110f3ffafa5345122c
4653 F20101203_AAALKU kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_107thm.jpg
4395e112fc2f6fe7e7abba7c206d500b
a6c636132733569013a55658b135421b29dbfc10
28768 F20101203_AAALLI kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_123.QC.jpg
3bab568858ee77fef8acaf3ba026c058
53e870fc829d0d0f32347b796f11cf3393d61b7e
4820 F20101203_AAALKV kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_044thm.jpg
327e7e5a4c5ed170ab39e149ab1c6f0b
855d3d799480ae4be90a7cdca8ace8e27f2f837d
6855 F20101203_AAALLJ kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_147thm.jpg
987467c5c75a95d68daae874492191e1
d04ecdd8de5bd70d7df1301776e5624f06b79145
26443 F20101203_AAALKW kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_011.QC.jpg
7e8a5133c198011514727181f089203d
afba88bfc13aa964830959b0d55da6c037c41cf2
7321 F20101203_AAALLK kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_125thm.jpg
f4466b4ebf9c88e6ce03e01a6e074847
69f8222b5d6e234f0903f62ae95ed82b2effcf3f
28173 F20101203_AAALMA kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_079.QC.jpg
59f487b3ce3ddf8901aa88cdb4e677c1
6959d3c6ef0907ac3d271640d8b114d440b382fa
7338 F20101203_AAALLL kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_161thm.jpg
0e45ffc558bc93eee9b2b037889227d5
51ded042cc903358694f3540f42d0bbe508d1e82
5706 F20101203_AAALKX kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_146thm.jpg
8087ffae6676a0c5f056ec5a69a9f4b7
186b23dfd362c53b598fb69bc4014d1e2d7fe57a
5852 F20101203_AAALMB kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_042thm.jpg
5c7a29aaa80d260ac8178f3ee32a10e2
1a9c530b3adcd758796988b27da616eb5cdce63e
7415 F20101203_AAALLM kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_158thm.jpg
86c23af5911547ab2d64e710e74a3735
0aa9e9ff428520f8d2c5ad06a923525189503339
27845 F20101203_AAALKY kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_070.QC.jpg
1ddc7d32edb54e4947d8620b2dd050b2
913a51c3194b4f27cedcbaf15e4451c863835c67
27769 F20101203_AAALMC kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_089.QC.jpg
19f9b0d5519427831b1edef925312479
310c2c0001d77ceaa79f42de1b108d2c26fbf33d
7441 F20101203_AAALLN kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_113thm.jpg
1fd87c3d5118796a85504c262e15c58b
9d43f814dd49905c9e5fcf9c7b95be95dc67c9ce
28092 F20101203_AAALKZ kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_027.QC.jpg
b7970cdbbab14fb55fa7082e076a828b
49671383f1636b418d332e5d7075c8e051851b54
25460 F20101203_AAALMD kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_017.QC.jpg
10bf951b3df78a7fd7f7e7f653f8d6ec
2b994c50ca08423a92c313f3a9720cd7016159fb
27735 F20101203_AAALLO kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_081.QC.jpg
73b015808bd9ea9d15f56d69d7ef690b
196f328ad87b279b69150a644771d57fbb25effb
7506 F20101203_AAALME kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_057thm.jpg
87ee73944c34aa1f5c04fd8737276f12
fa42dba1cd0688a404de88f1793ec8b36b83163a
28136 F20101203_AAALLP kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_053.QC.jpg
9d91acbd8d1ad60fc32efc3971273068
96a87c289f921e6b1931e0f97a64152032b83fed
27011 F20101203_AAALMF kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_153.QC.jpg
99d1adde10902506ef8b0af5fb82eef2
f57a5e53125bb7cc1b5d890284d5099e8962062f
26641 F20101203_AAALLQ kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_028.QC.jpg
68cac7370091e189087653f04144264f
742cf9d76531749017629b157b85b426fa87776a
28501 F20101203_AAALMG kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_041.QC.jpg
64d6778c5be77974dcc81942b3cf73db
be1660c55511ea0b2272b8105043ab635e0e1182
26526 F20101203_AAALLR kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_031.QC.jpg
9dba34f2b4ad1d1e6b7afe8259ee48b3
52459837b9604a609bd4211e8a9e248710aa23e7
27762 F20101203_AAALMH kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_039.QC.jpg
5efdcae0ad6a3bc96193d9b85468d27c
41fd5d7954a343c887bcc6ab5f3b5218e5db3a71
7685 F20101203_AAALLS kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_123thm.jpg
ad507893f1979d9a20e6e80239167d25
320644296c2754c6ffd88e6055f9fba46085c7cc
7107 F20101203_AAALMI kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_148thm.jpg
6d1ac157728b9a990b5292dea29a2b05
9d9bb25ed4e742bfb2c3cacef216ad784a2ecc00
4209 F20101203_AAALLT kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_065thm.jpg
a39f6e5998f6bcf35d3d780251d452a1
5cd14a11e4fd4106a5eee25f0afbcc3a5b04f5e6
10605 F20101203_AAALLU kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_047.QC.jpg
b7e6d8fe5e968e5d885c1702bd08ade5
0bf859d408979b1826822c04aa65521d3b0e6eed
7412 F20101203_AAALMJ kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_097thm.jpg
b6781886a512bd15c3472ff575ecd889
0d34f6adaef528a4f4359e56d6fb62ebda588dfe
17047 F20101203_AAALLV kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_130.QC.jpg
165d1e445cb12a18d0d5a20267e47928
7bdff6f05d8b4b6488052482670258af681b637f
7447 F20101203_AAALMK kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_026thm.jpg
acc39d7945896b109322b0d6d98c50fa
353971b3420176a42cd204d72587f4566d074928
23319 F20101203_AAALLW kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_013.QC.jpg
f5c35311c1903edb633a5212e418e969
e249e0709d97b16a9369c0666d60dfbafc0b92bc
6054 F20101203_AAALML kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_132thm.jpg
79713bc8092064491c54f122a63fa43a
13ca763944710fbb10a43028e15c762515ed0a36
25194 F20101203_AAALLX kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_092.QC.jpg
c2388bd229921f0504a9b43953b26d71
4457ea7338060bcd70e6b8f105c76bb771413b70
25539 F20101203_AAALNA kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_121.QC.jpg
69098a7ea8020bd0ce7f0cd1694849cc
8e15e3c8af10b9e19c317805cdbd444eb143a94e
27929 F20101203_AAALMM kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_057.QC.jpg
581ad677e2a628409f8c109d47b126be
0ffe5e62ab4f2da0e497342787bed5429cfbff11
7615 F20101203_AAALLY kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_041thm.jpg
fb23d44ae995f449519fc5d643a8f828
1f1e80cf358018736907ac805a1705b1844f03be
F20101203_AAALNB kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_053thm.jpg
ac4a04eb5f2133b92527af617958b51f
2b5d3974d21952ab533e744052fa0e26d04c6827
26663 F20101203_AAALMN kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_098.QC.jpg
428a46f5defddce554e04f2a33a0b396
8aebef3dac55312d3ef4fcfff0de8d2672b0be30
14205 F20101203_AAALLZ kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_135.QC.jpg
bb3f21d0fdb325a69cb2fd0d225bda9d
057d8e8d18411650767e33029c8f8193834afc31
24613 F20101203_AAAKKA kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_120.QC.jpg
82337c69d7d8c23837cb9ab967a166f9
3a56ad4c527d2a0a6f61d0c727b4a78bb1d62e3a
26384 F20101203_AAALNC kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_119.QC.jpg
4cf451116eed963299a0511436c6b563
f983c7d63053b99ed5247f10f3b3368baf8893c1
19412 F20101203_AAALMO kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_105.QC.jpg
1d119026f83f8212a35294dd909abb0b
e1842c188211e1026f80d440cc024151cbba73dd
27457 F20101203_AAAKKB kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_040.QC.jpg
c63a2f1a29794f447870d0bc673db350
2c4b076aa0011a07e3552fb3d20347d79b914efe
11845 F20101203_AAALND kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_067.QC.jpg
c4b37abec33c794a3cafafd1ec2e958c
381ebbef52d2de493a360ed535b70524c3692b13
26481 F20101203_AAALMP kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_021.QC.jpg
264e738606c43404171d67c5f780657a
c499019b75edfe9a2a49fb7e15a68342e467d92c
1051985 F20101203_AAAKKC kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_095.jp2
e906d78afbadc7cd17d77d4eedcab2bf
e7374b1cd6d635b5d740fbfc72555fd293d91402
2895 F20101203_AAALNE kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_136thm.jpg
321b26cb71fb015f8b557602470610b8
44d10d09f9915398205a44020e5f3e7cbe4a2d3d
5538 F20101203_AAALMQ kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_163thm.jpg
d6f98e5d542e7090ec0069cd3e19772e
5565434b50485b77c14d76c547ab7dc5e8e7f4c1
7420 F20101203_AAAKKD kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_140thm.jpg
0aad7171c5b8f70388cef647a924ca88
8bb0a559e30c262f09ac85ba5f01dfaf4014ee3d
7604 F20101203_AAALNF kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_127thm.jpg
8223d0381d99fad39a4241b1146dd656
6a3a00016ae94fa98bda11ecdc7ef9ba19599a7f
F20101203_AAALMR kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_023.QC.jpg
e92206e67d29ac37fe8f638223e6d774
2307483462d8cf3ee488c334937f2733cb273839
6313 F20101203_AAAKKE kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_006thm.jpg
e2800c0b5f1a9a3120c2a7b93b2d88a9
eb9cd380fbb6d83d91c36d874c12ca2d0fe14027
27282 F20101203_AAALNG kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_080.QC.jpg
d67b0463d61f1095fdebe46b557ef98b
eef63bd0d0807dc043706df705a2a5f4d38ebc13
29426 F20101203_AAALMS kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_034.QC.jpg
941bc90ffe9de0fe16b829ee44ac354c
17b0251bbc4fe592d1b754f40d60cc0c596d4ef4
5288 F20101203_AAAKKF kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_130thm.jpg
e9f0a2e0bef7376bdd04fc4fd0587dcd
297890e291362854abcd8fd9468359e99c8361e8
7082 F20101203_AAALNH kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_092thm.jpg
6bac068eee31eb15b632206cd8b1c344
00ec66eae16b00f9466f6c676de6ac5420d5c040
7220 F20101203_AAALMT kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_019thm.jpg
7e5e6fe87d2aaa1b5fae34505cca815a
be9fe8191ce4e05928a6041f670d0e46f7703066
F20101203_AAAKKG kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_080.tif
8e0cee80d98715000e86ae5fb960004f
110f61c886780f9ba55de9a410e6abf12d6a4d26
17250 F20101203_AAALNI kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_009.QC.jpg
d0b6d39ad54ac40f718508f8ef15308c
9eaa16bd10fd374b344fa31f5b5dfcd2823cf80f
26524 F20101203_AAALMU kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_073.QC.jpg
9327cf4bc73c68a9741caa1f2fca9d4c
d4ed2156f2a2778dabe97af244a0ec689027595f
5463 F20101203_AAAKKH kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_086thm.jpg
6f19723e2c1d803081b6e70719a0c41b
c8de067956d3c8800c49796efae15246f560a3cd
25945 F20101203_AAALNJ kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_037.QC.jpg
ce2091c733819475e73e7249829075fc
d14744933ba9372f0602616700d563b88f7c3077
F20101203_AAAKJT kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_109.tif
02314a16e3dc9c861c997671959ea3e5
948d6c45a9100bcbc2ecfbd5a3f6911ff60bc122
7698 F20101203_AAALMV kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_088thm.jpg
71e581614cbc056f9582fd2e3666119a
866723d6994d7ef9e0ea51728db3bd0ce277ce62
84147 F20101203_AAAKJU kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_022.jpg
26d80c6becfb277b7408617654e89279
baea50edac8ec263ad8256ec872f9cd1f2433f71
27082 F20101203_AAALMW kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_102.QC.jpg
015894db0bf2347a61ecbbcc36299388
4e24eb6b9db504ddebcfea61c7f25def5c5e16d1
1515722 F20101203_AAAKKI kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c.pdf
0a96651207a7a4c19aaaf7499ac485f6
a0964cb8e08d7d51cc4dc0a42eb7e85e1bab9091
27707 F20101203_AAALNK kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_050.QC.jpg
e792a4c1ac43af8dcbb2773095cfc498
e61e1ee7846d05351c902c5a5faea842d324ba61
26343 F20101203_AAALOA kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_115.QC.jpg
d438e07f1e5f0ff0cb23700e48da2e86
ec22d8e01627b6a096aaaa455b864e1f6c787950
F20101203_AAAKJV kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_079.jp2
1ac5412adf8f040a5b6f8f7d3d86b065
0b7875af7edbdcab247d6c6a84ea61b887ecff8a
7467 F20101203_AAALMX kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_080thm.jpg
747801c2c2784728a1d1fb5e9f3823f0
d25a973d0523f1c5ed0d50ba1184a048fb884c6d
F20101203_AAAKKJ kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_026.tif
a504245eb088529476b8af71c210c9b7
b61daf3c28b48c938ba9fe2a9e128a3100159508
18003 F20101203_AAALNL kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_084.QC.jpg
dfb505d674a76cf8c7283a340926f87f
4d7af672cd150b8ec8d2f9f8f0163a6cd8fe4e7d
28505 F20101203_AAALOB kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_077.QC.jpg
9fb71811a9a71898085e8a81102d5936
05c5f1b0dd37d80e44bbbfe0362d1401f99e6fef
F20101203_AAAKJW kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_011.tif
85208e168232fff289b13d250526436b
bf6d808e19fc2756c71d01fc40323f7231fdb5fd
28107 F20101203_AAALMY kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_061.QC.jpg
c31b2a35ef532e53baf5e587783d6ea1
cc73785199b9edd74bec9798d5f8e213cd83960e
F20101203_AAAKKK kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_128.tif
0c45cbb943c40c17518b8c9368641b66
e9387439e138131a1d82cb25c8fcafe73a481e57
27419 F20101203_AAALNM kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_074.QC.jpg
b00a16d843b0726249d34edb03f1ebe3
6eae019287b2b8b194d4ff9ad2caff9633e3bf3f
28778 F20101203_AAALOC kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_122.QC.jpg
3dd6beadc6f7bc664d7df3f17e09962d
0730884f181095a316cf953b3d43f67a2df915b7
64719 F20101203_AAAKJX kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_109.jpg
6d66e43f6a090cf16dfc494d5553e026
205519efbf659832ca0536c3b55f4a4bc2ed9d7a
7039 F20101203_AAALMZ kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_159thm.jpg
194d8dc73b822f4a8e46051c464842dd
88c4646a6a844bb7c89e995e22604c5a9660bff4
35792 F20101203_AAAKLA kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_139.jpg
442ec6c5ac589d16dcfc417889b8bb96
6b05af2b63ef5d7d99a3bcee5ac2dc7adc64e132
6930 F20101203_AAAKKL kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_051thm.jpg
33b06f578de4dd1baa9f60104e5f0a1b
37e253ff0b2199cd09010ea12113c233b24cfece
7247 F20101203_AAALNN kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_073thm.jpg
d6f32ea0c562db91f7cef83af7b52676
1832e48bcfd91778c37f5702936204cab52588ba
7379 F20101203_AAALOD kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_151thm.jpg
46095a1623ab08c02456a555b5c4f288
d23777cd21941f894ac72946837d5631dc3e8627
81846 F20101203_AAAKJY kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_104.jpg
47d8264845196a516a3ed970b18ac054
ce3e92fc310bde1ef407c4329d00ee7b6f50e24b
27613 F20101203_AAAKLB kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_004.QC.jpg
e982eb76a1a231be663dded26f40348c
a781fce11583fa35e0273752eac27c6d41431b2c
10903 F20101203_AAAKKM kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_134.QC.jpg
02d5eecea8097a3cf13ffe0571855acb
9913592f47099f357e24534ca03f758d41cf4d0d
26433 F20101203_AAALNO kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_091.QC.jpg
ed3741f088cfc353ba66a42a28f319d4
10c6ee960552220c1e5284023923bb609647eeef
5894 F20101203_AAALOE kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_082thm.jpg
5ff52115ca32dc7515537d5fd3634162
e57fc430c38e0011a30e09c237bfc1fcafcdd326
7259 F20101203_AAAKJZ kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_037thm.jpg
6a2e46051ffb527d47146f3dd6c61c22
4ac2ea31764197f5b0bdd52bee28387b2ed6ce6f
84248 F20101203_AAAKLC kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_056.jpg
6de7a7fb36686022384ab193456d99aa
7e591400eb242048f9d9f44539ebc3575f01b363
28245 F20101203_AAAKKN kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_007.QC.jpg
cfe855a32f163fdc3487ef48dab9336c
4a2707d39cb9a3136c1535c77cd3e2ee0b673ba5
28372 F20101203_AAALNP kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_093.QC.jpg
e02f55a6c81489bb8bc930521f816ac7
666d8f5515c25badfee38f2e5e53cbcb566303f0
11363 F20101203_AAALOF kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_069.QC.jpg
1c57e8b4f96fbd997b1383b26862a715
efb5a53751711a526be51a7b4d344fb990be40d0
517734 F20101203_AAAKLD kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_139.jp2
b4c85f6e89ff2f2cec9743e72ad79ebe
c631284db86ac0b2aa68dd2d6c3643b4db53bc48
6185 F20101203_AAAKKO kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_133thm.jpg
97c4f14d9d267095856eb3fe290a58cd
d4aa3c07c101db49db672eaec4990d5460f3c317
7353 F20101203_AAALNQ kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_050thm.jpg
cf50a0ccc3c76101bc2b950a44af4afb
72110c0d1ae0d51a4fc870b889673a0db354a789
7511 F20101203_AAALOG kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_027thm.jpg
b719b29fddf5f8b494091130bef5a19e
e42fa9a35293c31fc1af2bf9adecfdacd12d514d
7548 F20101203_AAAKLE kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_077thm.jpg
dbc3862d74efa60976c528642124fba1
ccdd189f4bc22728654ada82b0c9e8eda8baeb34
F20101203_AAAKKP kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_024.jp2
3bf41fc9b580c863c54884e8843ec0d3
9592e7fd646406a7723f2cd043f633f8de188cb4
7380 F20101203_AAALNR kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_062thm.jpg
86ff68a8cee049b61ef2f7ce0f315961
3b6abf4897e5ae41892f33c2d437c2e655fb1b34
4884 F20101203_AAALOH kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_109thm.jpg
9d845708226a1f46a47dd33ab1b4d05f
6ed6f24eaae9f2d0341ca2479d03ed4673e70f5d
25763 F20101203_AAAKLF kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_022.QC.jpg
8fa4a4a4fbab4e8284778f103740fccd
ebca7d6a3cae1471fa72f56249d1e6bd5c26ee3d
46375 F20101203_AAAKKQ kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_068.jpg
84dc031ec7719583ff0f32a2a5f92f2f
c40b5be359fb2998815717dcd0d740e0ff7893eb
5458 F20101203_AAALNS kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_066thm.jpg
9e8985f1bda84428ef291a437bc6eedc
21f9255b557766a91ff19acda176e2a094a7e2de
7049 F20101203_AAALOI kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_055thm.jpg
12c821a760f38db78b9bc07025a6f185
492a5045b5165f122937034d6fbee3e5f25e05ab
F20101203_AAAKLG kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_144.tif
feeb38555f15973b31210d564f22c134
775917468f6368e51dac7d614d6dc3a7e68cf4a0
29216 F20101203_AAAKKR kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_126.QC.jpg
46c61fd51d9dab0bb2d97df01d624fdb
216cc7dee7054ed129b7079d800e0263b6d2733f
27087 F20101203_AAALNT kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_019.QC.jpg
4695e5e455d55089c027b1801fd0fefa
c91e7b2e88bd1ef15a35aadcbcdd76db3df2bd1f
4198 F20101203_AAALOJ kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_111thm.jpg
c61d85afcd6e0d8122b55c76955266b6
40860c01b5abfd4de00e93460650f9bb814f4f02
F20101203_AAAKLH kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_117.jp2
4c3ea84b9c9362793cd6912fe17e66e8
ed590631a6c3f43b4c2ae44d87b3d164eed33a34
26250 F20101203_AAAKKS kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_151.QC.jpg
af5b497ca7583e7bdf0a395470edeead
1a3c137fbafe6285b80f992edab55488459f19df
7478 F20101203_AAALNU kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_154thm.jpg
b1a81a8defc2ca1d1fa460b30f92c19e
45df67099d9dad31e72115628dd0533fbadac5a7
25022 F20101203_AAALOK kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_075.QC.jpg
68628f1b47c7d20724e34b204d960057
d891d875ac6c7301d6adbc3ac6a69b285c4fc376
1051927 F20101203_AAAKLI kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_089.jp2
c9e9d8419c63ceeae6abdcd5cc6f93c4
25089fdcb5de2c945709228a58f21e3722cbe5be
63213 F20101203_AAAKKT kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_084.jpg
08d93e26ef63be58e198b383f5171736
380ca5fc6f7b0d77f6ed65a9fae5a48bbab7c45c
28436 F20101203_AAALNV kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_114.QC.jpg
8106c9097fe0804384529ce215c5f161
2ef6d5cbc479521503b49fa3d746e4f069c2f927
F20101203_AAAKKU kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_150.jp2
79079bdc3112d6c4dd689af0d61a67ae
0c43339c053ca216b741bf2f970ccc3f18609c3b
6009 F20101203_AAALNW kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_014thm.jpg
a145c61697c8bcdbb4ec2f9a05e6013b
63f2c9f2461a0d3dc3f548a9016809b31b4928cf
192267 F20101203_AAALPA UFE0022333_00001.xml
9afa3eb6ddf5ca65f5b923cff3e9416f
d0bc4fc91b47ddde271ca3809ff7586d232ca814
26731 F20101203_AAALOL kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_032.QC.jpg
2aa8b8a2e53fb8e53069725db9ca94ae
439de5d33504aa34f0401db329ef0ffdfba7e073
F20101203_AAAKLJ kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_084.tif
44cdf803289ad39cf423f80989b2a80c
6fd9cfb4b1c2b8fe85eff7c29d8496c099c1c7f3
28240 F20101203_AAAKKV kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_103.QC.jpg
6d13e6e58661d0fc0b7d11e27615ea2b
bd2c6cf7e6d04f80caf42f0007784099dab10896
25867 F20101203_AAALNX kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_143.QC.jpg
2ba4a3c48b1e53f665bbefbf0a31079a
f011db5dce0933115cc8e9ee61abc27270a46f71
27756 F20101203_AAALPB kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_026.QC.jpg
2d1eb6a307b3ebe2d01bcd91f04279e9
f482c011e3c28c9a254f8110852fcb919ccb0106
26396 F20101203_AAALOM kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_071.QC.jpg
d29aff2663fbf077f01b7687a6892b46
3ce32c7b6101c26bcd0c2b060bf7c8a237475a68
25501 F20101203_AAAKLK kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_157.QC.jpg
41e8e223d784f26b1891c3d1196eba36
600e1becceaebf1d802033c4931bf2244a8babf2
7269 F20101203_AAAKKW kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_157thm.jpg
55c2c98c78ad186cc760faefb22dde55
6b0da7e36958feb86710f62b4e51fe4b2cb5d33c
7539 F20101203_AAALNY kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_036thm.jpg
62cb55a5c5bd350bb9809fdf4e60c47d
d2bfdc224f85dfed5b203b5eb7295ab7f41b6894
15033 F20101203_AAALPC kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_048.QC.jpg
145eded344c8af1d41b95d29d3169524
f18ebbf1fa80cc4e7fc5ce412102c76d6985ece3
F20101203_AAALON kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_099thm.jpg
5a9b571b0632f322b5185ef286d7b153
a6eff577ad39da6b5e3c28fe8374b92810215151
27981 F20101203_AAALNZ kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_127.QC.jpg
a5d9942044e1bf894037bd08f3f743fc
7529ee007af36b5ee7610d2d1ef8a8504b630d54
28197 F20101203_AAAKMA kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_113.QC.jpg
d27942c260cefaff64767d374e677145
6a4efb513dce9d8cb0e7796bd541d49fef2b36d8
1051933 F20101203_AAAKLL kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_142.jp2
2d26490c66c3b2e3c7b589f5706ea677
ea47ae7e85c11c9977d3cc09498eaf6a8885eb77
53142 F20101203_AAAKKX kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_012.jpg
8f1f24111def82f5d00f49a1d4a0a50e
135c1de0d55bd66529e161bd61182c47308d3bdb
27834 F20101203_AAALPD kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_052.QC.jpg
a6ce250dec30ee976940902b809b4cf9
eff45b1eb6fbd3c34b43a3d73a47c3d79584ff39
7816 F20101203_AAALOO kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_117thm.jpg
649af332dcc527d1f66ebf9b8b66c183
df9c5a3173348a1f1586153fe4c077406795f2ac
87190 F20101203_AAAKMB kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_052.jpg
5e28ef93b711e22409a0daf6b9a2c81c
9631c4a333c73c410422a0ac5e1dd73027ecbf39
7482 F20101203_AAAKLM kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_098thm.jpg
ddebea5f5735d17b3c7b6a0b8251b4f6
2cff92f796f27c45b8628947f7363daeaa7026fc
F20101203_AAAKKY kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_046.tif
2e8e3a523d0dd6d5d058ca8e6cf8192e
a4cfe758b6c06de069d73c89412fdc5338c2a36a
7648 F20101203_AAALPE kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_070thm.jpg
a0e6c09dbae00755618c3e4742036751
109c918d31ba71da1c394d835d471882fd2c493e
F20101203_AAALOP kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_089thm.jpg
6c7a92500d1ee7b717234015c008b407
b43105702bf6ec8fa5323e998cfeac310a9e1229
F20101203_AAAKMC kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_136.tif
f52f05ba6d047f9ebbe38935271fe9b9
106377c77a8e829a410a0bb7158502e702b9d6ea
82744 F20101203_AAAKLN kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_147.jpg
3837105111895daa7f46585dd6ebdd16
346e6a93423f82a9321f20d8774ecccba4948fb4
F20101203_AAAKKZ kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_040.jp2
170b2e74bf78dd267537d0f5e4f202f6
fba21362bc3ddfc057fc0ec944986857add7df04
13446 F20101203_AAALPF kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_085.QC.jpg
1ba3d095fd9a07db3c55f2b9c746d359
55b6ceda8d4cb53d1d17874f08ddd86d8b1adf58
27973 F20101203_AAALOQ kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_024.QC.jpg
ad4e195c8082c85e7ec5596a216dce23
eef03cfa7d34b88799b9fc45e8a8b07bd75db6ae
34105 F20101203_AAAKMD kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_047.jpg
36cbe8d223c84d279deebe08b8059e7b
c291361ffdefa5767819bcbc22b93a34e3189a00
27720 F20101203_AAAKLO kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_030.QC.jpg
e0cef9b0a22dd398dd8437c289f329b2
81516c1cba3d0e930e0a61b4a87efe8a512734d5
F20101203_AAALPG kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_124thm.jpg
d48888fd77bcea9ac949c166538adf48
8a9887d599ba03a61bb3bc559c8c4b2653d69429
27611 F20101203_AAALOR kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_154.QC.jpg
5e6d37c1b3b1401131b350a8300ac254
15d1c975905f2a84d6ce32e1f8a0ef066fb9b611
77518 F20101203_AAAKME kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_120.jpg
9dc6286bc3dc01c54382fe53589af577
2d9e159cbc5208964a18eef06ea0f417d59d556e
F20101203_AAAKLP kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_161.tif
a10ce10e4fb2ac2e397d1f9faea8ac06
350eff34f250ed24b8bfcb0f96fb780794ae7065
7230 F20101203_AAALOS kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_029thm.jpg
d195c4ef963a884231078397107e90ee
a8279326da295a5b805bb622602e4112fe857721
28271 F20101203_AAAKMF kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_088.QC.jpg
86f2fea63179f4a16e5f17e563f3cd3f
580ad67d2ae75366c115aec23371f64b0373e6b7
1036898 F20101203_AAAKLQ kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_018.jp2
15dacb89369fa739f76c2539a4333522
46034dc84c9d4c964341ca4bcc15e9d80f9ff839
6835 F20101203_AAALOT kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_017thm.jpg
5f0ba868771153d5aa926e6633e8ef92
8fd3c2724e0726329840cdf26965086d84832ce7
93778 F20101203_AAAKMG kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_011.jpg
6db3a6ec2e6bfca9aaa2fee232fa4e20
1819bcebaa97fe6279f8c68b013f31baaaae29bc
F20101203_AAAKLR kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_009.tif
05827c66f3a70eeeaaf9a39ed34b23e7
50440bbe60b6784c9fc86957aedff904c8c7d4fd
5047 F20101203_AAALOU kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_084thm.jpg
c6881543232fb89e977dcedd3abee591
77392e57533680411df86a4b169ea34bdc65ae47
7014 F20101203_AAAKMH kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_072thm.jpg
492218bd7f615cb2ea88644bed993cc8
8517b6d9fb2b0bd575ada49327f84d6c227cde83
20473 F20101203_AAAKLS kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_129.QC.jpg
9a57e96cada7f45496255a733d1a6a9b
4a30c589e527a61280991c8de03a1fd652f63e50
6822 F20101203_AAALOV kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_120thm.jpg
9f71e1520ad6eba5ee1dc68aea525616
a9621cc78451c72ed3fc023ca63eab336b375aa5
100327 F20101203_AAAKMI kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_154.jpg
883f6508f3873659aec4740dab565146
8dc4a62f49fa9c31163e83e9c4c970dbdda7aa68
89432 F20101203_AAAKLT kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_113.jpg
47b189788cac0f97c4e2d9c9a6c27b00
baac83db291b704849a5b72f31b857ccc78f714f
25806 F20101203_AAALOW kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_156.QC.jpg
2696ea7871136c3e77103743630d5ec5
d747a8f9da5efb99ab92c7a7446c2d97d272b630
F20101203_AAAKMJ kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_097.jp2
03c0ebb550fa1b8bab8ae5c42ff66c48
9e3f686b0cf926509bf5edd02047de2561aecbe9
27125 F20101203_AAAKLU kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_016.QC.jpg
bbacca551e37b33b0d7d553e3ec71d2b
fae92c417833bb28e0fa5dd47239c1105d10e2f4
6700 F20101203_AAALOX kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_063thm.jpg
a0940d6a87778954dd10b6910966017f
7ad996089ed01c116223b074f1b6d8897264f193
F20101203_AAAKLV kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_135.tif
fb038ad6f9b6e221bb3ae8522d758bf3
18cb32b276abfaff5127b58eef7545a81b96455e
7453 F20101203_AAALOY kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_081thm.jpg
64bc87f60faf708d94f88e3f39536135
6e32444b20317e985a5e2e5de55bac7dde36f527
4062 F20101203_AAAKLW kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_012thm.jpg
65903f045f469795dd07febe9450308e
dd1281f2ea6fdab7d02c1898f830c8713974c637
F20101203_AAAKMK kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_151.tif
0cfda7812cdcdf990ff94be1dacee760
81a45d301b63ff5fba815b322474697f717236b5
12930 F20101203_AAALOZ kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_065.QC.jpg
b47adb31da8b68fd08d8fde0e220085b
61958390b00f8db504f137b08dd4b944affcde8e
F20101203_AAAKLX kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_029.jp2
8c7f4a65f9d6923ad8a44c7539020692
37aa7ce48a61c4af134d67b70d97cbfded7dd6f1
F20101203_AAAKNA kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_115.jp2
b6c335863d6cfd8f4acb00b8066aa232
98ae85210f555423780f022e5e06daf84505acc7
F20101203_AAAKML kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_107.tif
d31e9313042e4dfa1d7571ee4eda42d3
bd055d5defea04efbcf566a584d048926bb0ec82
F20101203_AAAKLY kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_131.tif
1499bc5c53b18f5175e1adeb4826d815
c00d38a12fdc1f822221f0cfc08ec719f045eb8d
F20101203_AAAKNB kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_157.jp2
78a0bc94b627de8ea485444bbe5b5e93
8e744e22593ad406533638d2db525f4652e50ad5
26769 F20101203_AAAKMM kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_056.QC.jpg
0420ecb6deee8d175d55908fb0f155c9
6d56a7e9c79bc949e7f109f7adc2711132d853f5
F20101203_AAAKLZ kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_023.tif
87ba55d44461f882fe5352c5584a69ff
838ca158af1e38395d279edb890e1bc09993d8f8
7476 F20101203_AAAKNC kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_005thm.jpg
a0a85b196ce30e20bb0ee0164f76ebb2
f5b482407d68c95cb848f1dda653c8ede46ecfcf
7322 F20101203_AAAKMN kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_058thm.jpg
9cb2e6f5e9520549b818c2cfa240e7f4
33b19b411129599145adb4a398ac24181f617ecb
36908 F20101203_AAAKND kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_106.jpg
8e83e5730bcd811a213a00307270a68b
b591cd13d430b96eefed0389b7f4ab6a3dd813ec
13222 F20101203_AAAKMO kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_068.QC.jpg
51e427a06e3bcd85e36d92fa986d4104
0c1daf19997f08c0d0cbb21cb760db6b1bec7d00
F20101203_AAAKNE kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_047.tif
e87edc19dfdfe2a87417b7913eb39471
d21d386edd25ab5c51a545742d4cb3befca45a34
24776 F20101203_AAAKMP kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_020.QC.jpg
c9a58dc3199a5250f3c47f7cc73e3bc8
77361fb49d554ab15795c4085accc7e3cbac3a99
23898 F20101203_AAAKNF kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_018.QC.jpg
dbe31c6063efa64b1a1042fb49c58cd2
1e7471cd2a76ebc5b82be75117b5e144f5ec2988
80032 F20101203_AAAKMQ kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_121.jpg
7c6ee376df53df5cc2a7b39485630ddb
6e12cec154557bbae9962593d69489e7c8548a0c
25642 F20101203_AAAKNG kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_148.QC.jpg
8a4d3fbfbbe4485d8907baa33310a5b1
7835a260f55de137e17052a62c71acdd5e2f8a74
11211 F20101203_AAAKMR kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_139.QC.jpg
f76cbb6749bdbe7f5cf2b2420434eed2
904f0a4c4940fddaeb8dafbe2a00439ad579a9da
77619 F20101203_AAAKNH kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_075.jpg
c24b0fab6f19e4761349f13dcc2236c9
2f5188cdbea5975be9a4bed1a174abae4d54cccf
F20101203_AAAKMS kinatinkarabalasubramanian_c_Page_003.tif
33d978f786729f7e5d9b41d24b969b0e
949b70621a8e3eda3474cfebc4b3111765ae6bb7



PAGE 1

1 QUANTIFICATION OF ASYMMETRICAL STEPPING POST-STROKE AND ITS RELATIONSHIP TO HEMIPARE TIC WALKING PERFORMANCE By CHITRA LAKSHMI KINATINKARA BALASUBRAMANIAN A DISSERTATION PRESENTED TO THE GRADUATE SCHOOL OF THE UNIVERSITY OF FLOR IDA IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA 2008

PAGE 2

2 2008 Chitra Lakshmi Kinatinkara Balasubramanian

PAGE 3

3 To Mummy, Appa and Anjan

PAGE 4

4 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I would like to express my hear tfelt gratitude to my advisor Dr. Steve Kautz for opening the doors of science to me, his im peccable scientif ic vision and for kindling the fire of curiosity in me. I cannot thank him enough for his unrelenting support and for his constant belief in me to explore my strengths that I was myself unsure of I am also indebted to the exceptional members on my committee Dr. Andrea Behr man, Dr. Craig Velozo and Dr. James Cauraugh for their invaluable support, belief in my work and for inspiring th e art of being a scientist. Thanks go to each and every person in the lab: Ryan, Kelly and Naresh for all their hard work and assistance in data analyses; Mark and Erin for their help in data collection and for putting in that extra effort on my behalf during the home stretch. A special thanks goes to Erin for being my Angel! I would also like to tha nk Maria Kim and Lise Worthen for collecting and helping me access the data for my first study that jumpstarted my research. I want to thank Dr. Richard Neptune and Dr. Felix Za jac for their invaluable commen ts and contributions to my research. I have learnt a lot from the two of th em! I want to thank all subjects who volunteered to participate in my research studies. None of of my research pursuits would be possible without them. My research pursuits would not be a possibi lity without the str ong infrastructure and resources provided by UF for graduate education. Th anks go to UF also for inspiring the spirit of being a familythe gator family! I am grateful to the UF Alumni Association for granting me the Alumni fellowship that funded my education for four years. I am also thankful to NIH and VA Medical Center for their grant funding to Dr. St eve Kautz that helped build and maintain the HMPL where I pursued all my research. Faculty a nd staff in the Rehabili tation Science Doctoral (RSD) Program and Physical Therapy Departme nt have been an essential support system throughout my doctoral studies. Sp ecial thanks go to fellow RSD graduate students and the

PAGE 5

5 people at Brain Rehabilitation Re search Center mostly for bei ng my home away from home! Thanks go to all my friends here in the US and in India for their wonderful friendships that made this my time as a graduate student so much better. None of this would be possible if it we rent for my parents Drs. Shyamala and Balasubramanian. From the time I can remember, Mummy and Appa have given me the freedom to explore my potential and always encouraged me to seek the best in the academic arena. I want to thank them for selflessly l oving and supporting me and for providing me with everything and much more! Special thanks go to Mummy for the rock of support and love she is to our family and for being my role model in life. My dissertation work is dedicated to her! I am extremely thankful to my loving sist ers Pooja and Vidya a nd my brother-in-law Karthik for always sticking together in times of trials and tribulat ions that have helped me focus and prioritize my education here in the US. They are my backbone! A special thanks goes to my partner in sin.my aunt (Mangalam) for her belief in my abilities and for her love. I also want to thank my parents-in-law Retired Lieutenant Commander Padmalochan Das and Runu Baruah for loving me as their daughter and selflessly en couraging me to pursue my endeavors. I am grateful that my time as a graduate student was shared w ith my darling husband Anjan. His unconditional love and encouragement have been pivotal to keep me going throughout my graduate studies. I am short at words to thank him for putting my dreams before his and constantly moving around the globe (litera lly!) to be with me and help me pursue my education. He has shared with me times of hope and despair, frustrati on and exhilaration, and everything in-between. I thank him for being my best friend throughout this journey! Finally, thank you God for giving me the stre ngth and courage to go after my dreams and for bringing these wonderful people into my life during my doctoral education.

PAGE 6

6 TABLE OF CONTENTS page ACKNOWLEDGMENTS...............................................................................................................4 LIST OF TABLES................................................................................................................. ........10 LIST OF FIGURES.......................................................................................................................11 ABSTRACT...................................................................................................................................13 CHAP TER 1 INTRODUCTION..................................................................................................................15 2 LITERATURE REVIEW.......................................................................................................18 Introduction................................................................................................................... ..........18 Part 1: Overview of Walking Function................................................................................... 18 Neuromotor Control of Healthy Gait..............................................................................18 Quantifying Gait: Phases in the Healthy Gait Cycle....................................................... 19 Walking Capacity after a Stroke...................................................................................... 19 Stroke: incidence and consequences........................................................................ 19 Pathophysiological basis of the lo comotor disorder post-stroke ..............................20 Nature and rate of walking recovery........................................................................ 21 Walking disability in the chronic phase................................................................... 22 Part 2: Asymmetry in Spatiotemporal St ep Characteristics and Ground Reaction Fo rces during Hemiparetic Walking............................................................................................... 22 Spatiotemporal Characteristics of Steps.......................................................................... 23 Temporal asymmetry................................................................................................ 24 Spatial asymmetry....................................................................................................25 Ground Reaction Forces in Hemiparetic Gait................................................................. 26 Relevance of the Reviewed Literature to Study One......................................................27 Part 3. Intra-Subject Vari ability during W alking................................................................... 28 Motor Control and Gait Variability................................................................................. 28 Significance of gait variabili ty: theoretical approach .............................................. 28 Role of variability during walking...........................................................................28 Step-by-Step Variability in Sp atiotemporal Characteristics ............................................ 29 Step Variability as Quantifiable Markers of Impaired Walking..................................... 30 Relevance of Reviewed Literature to Study Two............................................................32 Part 4. Foot Placement in a Body Reference Frame............................................................... 32 Defining Foot Placement Relative to Body..................................................................... 33 Control of Foot during Gait............................................................................................. 33 Body Center of Mass Position and Velocity : Pos tulated Link to Foot Placement.......... 33 Foot Placement Relative to Body and its Relation to W alking Sub-tasks...................... 34 Relevance of Reviewed Literature to Study Three..........................................................35 Part 5. Pre-Swing and Swing Ph ase during Hem iparetic Gait................................................ 36

PAGE 7

7 Introduction to Pre-Swing and Swing Phase during Gait................................................36 Kinematic Characteristics duri ng Pre-Swing and Swing Phase ......................................37 Kinetic Characteristics duri ng Pre-Swing and Swing phase ...........................................38 Moments, Powers, Angular velocities......................................................................38 Interjoint coordinati on during swing phase .............................................................. 40 Muscle Activity during Pre-Swing and Swing Phase...................................................... 41 Relevance of Reviewed Literature to Study Four...........................................................42 3 RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN STEP LENGTH ASYMMETRY AND WALKING PERFORM ANCE IN SUBJECTS WI TH CHRONIC HEMIPARESIS................................ 49 Introduction................................................................................................................... ..........49 Methods..................................................................................................................................51 Participants......................................................................................................................51 Procedures..................................................................................................................... ..52 Data Analyses..................................................................................................................53 Statistical Analyses.......................................................................................................... 54 Results.....................................................................................................................................55 Relationship between Step Length Asymmetry (SLR) and GRFs.................................. 55 Relationship between Asymmetrical Step Lengths, He miparetic Severity and Walking Speed.............................................................................................................57 Relationship between Step Length Asym m etry, Time Spent in Pre-Swing and Swing Time..................................................................................................................57 Relationship between SLR, Change in Gait Speed and Parameters That C ontribute to Change in Speed......................................................................................................57 Discussion...............................................................................................................................58 Relationship between Step Length Asymm etry and Propulsive Forces during Hemiparetic Walking...................................................................................................58 Relationship between Step Length Asym m etry, Walking Speed and Hemiparetic Severity........................................................................................................................61 Relationship between Step Length Asym m etry, Paretic Pre-Swing Time and Vertical GRFs..............................................................................................................62 Conclusions.............................................................................................................................63 4 VARIABILITY IN SPATIOTEMPORAL ST EP CHARACTERISTICS AND ITS RELATIONSHIP TO WALKING PE RFORMANCE POST-STROKE...............................70 Introduction................................................................................................................... ..........70 Methods..................................................................................................................................71 Participants......................................................................................................................71 Procedures..................................................................................................................... ..72 Data Analyses..................................................................................................................73 Statistical Analyses.......................................................................................................... 74 Results.....................................................................................................................................75 Differences in Step Variability betw een Healthy and He miparetic Walking.................. 75 Association between Step Variability, C linical Assessm ents and Asymmetry Index..... 76 Discussion...............................................................................................................................77

PAGE 8

8 Differences in Step Variability between Healthy and He miparetic Participants............ 77 Relationship between Hemiparetic Step Variability and Im paired Performance Post-Stroke...................................................................................................................78 Study Limitations............................................................................................................ 81 Conclusions.............................................................................................................................82 5 FOOT PLACEMENT IN A BODY RE FER ENCE FRAME DURING WALKING AND ITS RELATIONSHIP TO HEMIPA RETIC WALKING PERFORMANCE.............. 88 Introduction................................................................................................................... ..........88 Methods..................................................................................................................................90 Participants......................................................................................................................90 Procedures..................................................................................................................... ..91 Data Analyses..................................................................................................................92 Statistical Analyses.......................................................................................................... 94 Results.....................................................................................................................................95 Quantifying Foot Placement Relative to the Pelvis ......................................................... 95 Relationship between Anterior-Posterior F oot Pla cements Relative to Pelvis, Step Length Asymmetry and Paretic Propulsion................................................................. 96 Relationship between Medial-Lateral Foot Place ments Relative to Pelvis, Step Widths, Paretic Weight Support and Dynamic Stability Margin................................. 97 Discussion...............................................................................................................................98 Anterior-Posterior Foot Placement Relative to Pelvis and its Relation ship to Step Length Asymmetry and Forward Progression............................................................. 98 Medial-Lateral Foot Placement Relative to Pelv is and its Rela tionship to Weight Supported on Paretic Leg and Dynamic Stability Margin......................................... 101 Limitations.................................................................................................................... .103 Conclusions...........................................................................................................................104 6 EVALUATION OF STEP LENGTH GENERATION DURING POST-STROKE HEMIPARE TIC WALKING USING A NOVEL METHODOLOGY OF STEP-BYSTEP VARIABILITY IN GAIT DATA.............................................................................. 112 Introduction................................................................................................................... ........112 Methods................................................................................................................................115 Participants....................................................................................................................115 Procedures..................................................................................................................... 116 Data Analyses................................................................................................................117 Statistical Analyses........................................................................................................ 118 Results...................................................................................................................................120 Predictors of Step Length Variability a nd the Dif ferences in Selected Predictor Variables across the Asymmetrical Sub-Groups....................................................... 120 Shorter paretic group..............................................................................................120 Symmetric group.................................................................................................... 121 Longer paretic group.............................................................................................. 121 Discussion.............................................................................................................................122

PAGE 9

9 Contralateral Stance Leg Ground Reaction Force (AP I mpulse during Ipsilateral Swing) is a Significant Predicto r of Step Length Variability.................................... 123 Ipsilateral Hip Impulse in Early Swing is a Sign ificant Predic tor of Step Length Variability in Persons taking Longer Paretic than Non-Paretic Steps.......................124 Ankle-Joint Center Velocity at Toe-Off is a Significant Predictor of Non-Paretic Step Length Variability .............................................................................................. 126 Leg Orientation at Toe-Off and Pelvis Ve locity at Toe-Off and their Contribution to Explaining Step Length Variability .......................................................................126 Within-Subjects Regression Models............................................................................. 127 Limitations.................................................................................................................... .128 Conclusions...........................................................................................................................129 7 CONCLUSIONS: INTEGRATING THE FINDINGS......................................................... 140 Step Length Asymmetry during Hem iparetic Walking........................................................ 140 Step Variability during Hemiparetic Walking...................................................................... 141 Asymmetrical Stepping in a B ody Reference Fram e Post-Stroke........................................ 142 Step Length Generation during Hem iparetic Walking......................................................... 142 Summary...............................................................................................................................143 APPENDIX A LOWER EXREMITY FUGL-MEYER SCALE.................................................................. 144 B DYNAMIC GAIT INDEX SCALE...................................................................................... 145 LIST OF REFERENCES.............................................................................................................147 BIOGRAPHICAL SKETCH.......................................................................................................163

PAGE 10

10 LIST OF TABLES Table page 3-1. Correlation between SLR and walking variables............................................................... 644-1. Definitions of study variables........................................................................................... .824-2. Step variability (expressed as standard deviation) within the hemiparetic population sub-divided based on thei r performance measures............................................................ 835-1. Definition of study variables............................................................................................ 1056-1. Subject characteristics.................................................................................................. ....1306-2. Average gait characteristic s for individual participants................................................... 1316-3. Regression models for individual partic ipants to predict paretic step length variability.................................................................................................................... .....1326-4. Regression models for individual partic ipants predicting non-p aretic step length variability.................................................................................................................... .....133

PAGE 11

11 LIST OF FIGURES Figure page 2-1. A simplified model demonstrating neural control of gait .................................................. 43 2-2. Division of a gait cycle into phases................................................................................... 44 2-3. Methodology for collection of spatiotemporal characteristics during walking using an instrum ented mat (GAITRite)............................................................................................ 45 2-4. Illustration of ground reaction forces exerted by the lim bs and typical force curves........ 46 2-5. Variability (in stride time) during walking and its relation to risk for falls ....................... 47 2-6. Power profiles in swing phase of a healthy gait cycle ....................................................... 48 3-1. Illustration of horizontal GRF i mpulses............................................................................65 3-2. Comparison of GRFs between the pareti c and non-paretic legs for subjects walking with differing SLR .............................................................................................................66 3-3. Relationship between st ep length ratio and Propulsion Paretic.............................................67 3-4. Relationship between step length as ymmetry, walking speed and hem iparetic severity....................................................................................................................... ........68 3-5. Change in speed, cadence and individual step lengths in subjects walking at different SLR [SLR > 1.1 (n = 21), 0.9 < SLR < 1.1 (n = 21), SLR < 0.9 (n = 4)].......................... 69 4-1. Differences in temporal variability betw een healthy (n = 22) and participants with hem iparesis (n = 94) at Self-selected (SS) walking speeds............................................... 84 4-2. Differences in spatial variability betw een healthy (n = 22) and participants with hem iparesis (n = 94) at Self-selected (SS) walking speeds............................................... 85 4-3. Differences in temporal variability in hem iparetic participants based on their performance on clinical assessments................................................................................. 86 4-4. Differences in spatial variability in hemiparetic participants based on their perform ance on clinical assessments................................................................................. 87 5-1. Illustration of marker positions for kinematic data collection and the SIMM model generated ..........................................................................................................................106 5-2. Calculation of ante rior-posterior and m edial-lateral foot placements relative to pelvis.. 107 5-3. Foot placement relative to pelvis during hemiparetic and healthy gait........................... 108

PAGE 12

12 5-4. Relationship between anterior foot placem ent asymmetry relative to pelv is and step length asymmetry in participants with hemiparesis......................................................... 109 5-5. Relationship between step length asymmetry and anterior-posterior foot p lacement relative to pelvis in participants with hemiparesis........................................................... 110 5-6. Relationship between paretic and non-p are tic lateral foot placement asymmetry relative to pelvis and percent weig ht supported on the paretic leg.................................. 111 6-1. An individual participant walking on the split belt treadmill as kinematic, kinetic and EMG data were recorded ................................................................................................. 134 6-2. Illustration of vari ables used in the study ........................................................................135 6-3. Frequency distribution of step-tostep variability in step lengths. ................................... 136 6-4. Non-paretic AP impulse and Paretic hip im pulse during paretic stepping in the asymmetrical sub-groups................................................................................................. 137 6-5. Relationship between paretic hip impulse in early swing, non-pa retic AP impulse in early and late swing in an individual participant taking longer paretic steps than nonparetic ...............................................................................................................................139

PAGE 13

13 Abstract of Dissertation Pres ented to the Graduate School of the University of Florida in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy QUANTIFICATION OF ASYMMETRICAL STEPPING POST-STROKE AND ITS RELATIONSHIP TO HEMIPARETI C WALKING PERFORMANCE By Chitra Lakshmi Kinatinkara Balasubramanian August 2008 Chair: Steven A. Kautz Major: Rehabilitation Science Asymmetrical stepping is a char acteristic feature of hemiparetic walking and a result of sensorimotor deficits post-stroke Asymmetry measures (that is, relative performa nce of paretic leg) may characterize hemiparetic gait better than overall gait performance measures (such as gait speed) and can provide insights into underl ying paretic leg impairments. Therefore, the major purpose of this dissertation was to quant ify the asymmetry in steps post-stroke and understand its relationship to hemiparetic walkin g performance. Overall, four studies were conducted. Persons with chronic hemiparesis and healthy controls walked overground and over a split-belt instrumented treadmill as spatiotemporal, kinematic and kinetic data were collected. Clinical assessments included lower-extremity Fugl-Meyer grading and Dynamic Gait Index assessments. In study one, step length asymmetry during wa lking was quantified. Results showed that step length asymmetry related to propulsive force generation during hemiparetic walking. Further, asymmetrical step lengths may not n ecessarily limit the self-selected walking speed likely due to other compensatory mechanisms. We suggest that step length asymmetry can be utilized as a clinical measure to evaluate asymmetrical stepping post-stroke.

PAGE 14

14 In study two, step-by-step variability and its relation to asymmetrical stepping were investigated. Results showed that increased spa tiotemporal variability, asymmetry in swing and pre-swing time variability and re duced width variability were re lated to severe hemiparesis, asymmetrical stepping and poor balance. We suggest that step-by-step va riability measures are quantifiable markers of impaired walking performance post-stroke. In study three, asymmetrical stepping was evaluated in a body reference frame. Results showed that anterior-posterior and medial-lateral foot plac ements relative to body were asymmetrical and this foot plac ement asymmetry related to step length asymmetry but not step widths. Wider paretic foot placement relative to pelvis than non-paretic also related to reduced paretic leg weight support and late ral instability, suggesting the clin ical utility of medial-lateral foot placement relative to pelvis as an outcome to quantify weight support during hemiparetic walking. In study four, mechanisms underlying step le ngth generation were evaluated. Contralateral anterior-posterior and hip impul ses during swing explained the st ep length variability in the majority of participants. However, relationship of the predictors to step lengths differed in the asymmetrical sub-groups. This implies that mech anisms of step length generation were different across persons showing differing step length as ymmetry patterns. Based on these mechanisms, we have proposed specific impairments and th erapeutic strategies targeted towards these impairments underlying asymmetrical stepping.

PAGE 15

15 CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION The Am erican Heart Association reports approximately 700,000 cases of stroke or cerebrovascular accident annually [1] Stroke is the number-one cause of long-term disability around the world [2] and is estimated to result in $30 billion in health care costs and lost productivity each year [3]. As the most disablin g chronic disease, the cumulative consequences of stroke are often staggering for individuals, families, and the society [3, 4]. Hemiparesis (unilateral movement dysfuncti on or weakness of one-half of the body) is commonly seen in three-quarters of persons post-str oke [5]. The residual sensorimoto r control deficits of a person with post-stroke hemiparesis involves multiple impairments such as muscle weakness, abnormal synergistic organization of movement, impair ed force regulation, abnormal muscle tone, impaired balance and sensory deficits [2, 5, 6]. Additionally, residual cognitive and visual deficits contribute to the reduced functi onal mobility in this population [7, 8]. Regaining independent walking is the most often-stated goal fo r rehabilitation in patients post-stroke [9]. Walking deficits in those who have sustained a stroke range from complete immobility to independent mobility, with almost a third of stroke survivors showing severe walking impairments [10]. Although post-stroke hemiparesis appears to reflect a single diagnostic category, there is immense heternogenity in the walking perfor mance post-stroke [11], warranting a systematic characterization of walking performance deficits and underlying impairments. Quantification of impairments th at limit functional walking performance and investigation of mechanisms underlying these impairm ents will directly assi st in development of targeted therapies to improve hemiparetic walking function. Asymmetrical performance between lower extremities is a characteristic hallmark that is unique to hemiparetic gait [12, 13] While the asymmetrical nature of hemiparetic walking is

PAGE 16

16 well documented in the literature [12-15], there is insufficient understanding of the underlying mechanisms related to gait asymmetry. One of the primary reasons limiting an integrated understanding of gait asymmetry post-stroke is the heterogene ity in asymmetrical patterns among stroke patients primarily due to the dive rse motor recovery processes and compensatory mechanisms [16]. Furthermore, the relationship of gait asymmetry to functional performance is unclear, primarily because functional performance has been traditionally evaluated using walking speed [17]. Gait asymmetry is reported to show a weak relation to attained walking speed implying that asymmetry may not limit th e functional performance [5, 17-19]. However, faster walking speeds in some persons show ing severe asymmetry can be achieved by compensatory strategies from the non-paretic leg, limiting the specific understanding of the contribution of paretic leg performance to functio nal performance. While it can be argued that compensations post-stroke are central to the wa lking performance due to altered circuitry and limited ability after a neurological injury [18], it is essential to differentiate impairments from compensations such that therapeutic strategies can be specifically designed to improve the paretic leg performance. Furthermore, there is no clear consensus in the literature regarding the clinical relevance of evaluating gait asymmetry [5]. As a clinical m easure, gait velocity reflects overall gait performance but is limited in its value to ev aluate post-stroke gait specific to paretic leg impairments [14]. In turn, asymmetry measures (i .e., relative performance of the paretic leg) can provide insights on the paretic leg performance in relation to the non-pa retic leg. Therefore, asymmetry measures could be deve loped as outcomes that specifica lly reflect the contribution of the paretic leg towards functional walking. The ai m of this dissertation was to systematically quantify asymmetrical performance (specifical ly in stepping measures) during hemiparetic

PAGE 17

17 walking, to explore underlying mechanisms and to understand how asymmetry might relate to walking performance post-stroke. In particular, th is dissertation will focus on stepping (spatialtemporal) asymmetry. A step during walking is the final outcome of all events occurring in the gait cycle [20]. Therefore, spatial-temporal char acteristics of steps (such as step length, swing time, etc.) can be used as quantifiable measures of walking performance reflective of underlying gait processes [21]. Furthermore, stepping parame ters can be easily recorded enhancing their clinical utility as gait performance measures. In this dissertation, four st udies were conducted to quantify asymmetrical stepping and understand its relationship to hemiparetic walkin g performance. In the first study, step length asymmetry during walking was qua ntified and the relationship between spatial asymmetries and hemiparetic walking performance was explained. In the second study, the st ep-by-step variability in selected spatial and temporal characteristics of steps was evaluated and their relation to stepping asymmetry and hemiparetic performa nce was explained. The third study of this dissertation evaluated asymmetri cal stepping in a body reference fr ame to gain insights regarding asymmetrical foot placement relative to the body during hemiparetic walking. Finally, in the fourth study of this dissertation, mechanisms related to initial conditions of the leg and swing phase were investigated to explain step length generation during hemiparetic walking. The overall purpose of studies in this dissertation was to provide a foundation for the development of a framework to use asymmetry measures to asse ss walking impairments post-stroke. Specificity in assessment of walking impairments will, in tu rn, facilitate the development of rehabilitation strategies that are cost -effective and efficient.

PAGE 18

18 CHAPTER 2 LITERATURE REVIEW Introduction The following literature review is composed of six m ain pa rts and provides the background underlying specific aims of this dissertation study. Part one, is an overview of walking function and describes walking deficits of persons who have sustained a stroke In the second part, literature related to motor control mechanisms in hemiparetic walking is presented. This section presents background literature rele vant to Study One (Chapter 3). In the third part, intra-subject variability during walking is discussed in relevance to Study Two (Chapter 4) of this dissertation. Part four describes literature related to foot placement during walking and forms the basis for aims of Study Three (Chapter 5). In part five, pre-swing and swing phase control during walking is discussed and this part focuses on the literature relevant to Study Four (Chapter 6) of this dissertation. Part 1: Overview of Walking Function Neuromotor Control of Healthy Gait Walking is essentially an inter-lim b coordina ted movement in which the limbs move in a symmetrical alternating pattern such that the bod y can progress forward in a stable and efficient manner [22, 23]. Human walking is remarkable in that the healt hy locomotor system integrates input from the motor cortex, cerebellum, and the basal ganglia, as well as synchronizes feedback from visual, vestibular and proprioceptive sensors to produce carefully controlled motor commands that result in coordinated muscle firings and limb movements [24]. Figure 2-1 demonstrates a model of walking from previ ous works [25, 26]. While the spinal pathways (central pattern generators) can generate the basic locomotor rhythm, sensory inputs from higher

PAGE 19

19 centers (through descending pathways as cortic ospinal tracts) and feedback from peripheral mechanisms (afferent feedback) enable a rich variation in the basic locomotor rhythm. Furthermore, the three major requirements for successful locomotion are suggested to be a) progression, defined as the ability to generate a basic locomoto r pattern that can move the body in a desired direction; b) stab ility, defined as the ability to support and control the body against gravity; c) adaptability, defined as the ability to meet the indi viduals goals and the demands of the environment [27]. Quantifying Gait: Phases in the Healthy Ga it Cycle Walking function is usually quan tified as a Gait cycle. A Gait (Stride) cycle is defined as the events occurring from foot stri ke of one limb to the foot strike of the ipsilateral limb [28, 29]. Each gait cycle is further divide d into a stance phase (as when ipsilateral limb is on the ground) and swing phase (as when ipsilateral limb is swinging with no contact on the ground) [29]. Stance and Swing phases of a gait cycle can be fu rther sub-divided into different phases. Figure 2-2 presents these sub-divisi ons of a Gait cycle phase. Walking Capacity after a Stroke Stroke: incidence and consequences OSullivan et al. (2000) has de fined a stroke, o r cerebrovasc ular accident (CVA), as an acute onset of neurological dysfunction due to an abnormality in cerebral circulation with resultant signs and symptoms that correspond to i nvolvement of 19 focal areas of the brain [30]. The American Heart Association reports stroke as a common neurologic al event occurring in 700,000 people annually. Over 4 million people currently live with residual deficits [31]. Stroke is the primary cause of long-term disability and is classified as one of th e most disabling chronic diseases. It has been estimated that one in five stroke survivors need help walking and seven out of ten cannot return to th eir previous jobs [32]. Fifty one perc ent of stroke surv ivors are unable to

PAGE 20

20 return to any type of work [33]. In particular; ability to return to work is primarily shown to relate to walki ng function [34, 35]. Pathophysiological basis of the locomotor disorder post-stroke The pathophysiological basis of walking disability after a stroke is dam age to motor neurons and pathways of the central nervous system caused by interruption of arterial blood supply because of a hemorrhage (hemorrhagic str oke) or thrombus (ischemic stroke) usually on one side of the brain [35]. Consequently, paresis (or paralysis) is observed in opposite half of the body (hemiparesis) [36-38]. The types and degrees of disability that follow a stroke primarily depend upon multiple factors such as location and size of brain lesion, severity of the lesion, individual degree of spontaneous recovery, and the duration of st roke onset [39, 40]. Nonetheless, residual deficits ar e common after a stroke. Typical re sidual deficits after a stroke include sensorimotor, cognitive and visual deficits, all of which can independently or in combination result in reduced or impaired walking ability. Motor control impairments of weakness (paresis) [41], loss of volitional movements of the weaker or paretic side (opposite to lesion) or inappropriately gr aded muscle activations of the weaker side affect locomotor performance imme diately after a stroke [36, 39]. Impairments of spasticity and changes in the mechanical properties of muscles further contribute to walking disability, developing a few weeks after the initial insult [42]. Nonetheless, damage to the motor control system and the re sidual impairments vary with the natu re and extent of brain lesion [35]. Therefore, while there are some common moto r control impairments that affect walking performance after a stroke, several sub-groups within the population can be identified that present differing motor control impairments.

PAGE 21

21 Nature and rate of walking recovery Mechanisms of recov ery: Recovery following a stroke is a complex process involving both spontaneous recovery and recovery due to the effects of a therapeutic intervention that are usually difficult to separate [5]. In general, wh ile the mechanisms of lo comotor recovery after a stroke are largely unknown, it is suggested that co rtical and spinal reorganization [43], functional compensation from existing pathways [44], new ne uronal sprouting [44] a nd spinal and afferent reflex modulation [45, 46] are potential mechan isms that contribute to functional locomotor recovery. Furthermore, motor recovery processes that unde rlie walking recovery specifically can be explained (at least partially) by the step-wise reco very process earlier proposed by Twitchell and colleagues [47]. Twitchell et al. (1951) argued that motor rec overy follows a step-wise and predictable sequence after an initi al stage of areflexia and flaccid paralysis. After this initial stage, reflexes return, become hyperactive, muscle tone increase s and spasticity develops. In the next stage, voluntary movement appears as part of stereotyped, reflexive flexor and extensor muscle synergies, after which voluntary m ovement may be achieved out of synergy. Finally, normalization of muscle tone and reflexes may occur. Rate of recovery: Only 23 37 % of persons who have su stained a stroke are able to walk independently during the first week [11], but th ere is a general agreem ent that 50 80 % of survivors can walk at 3 weeks or at discharg e [48], and by 6 months as many as 85 % of the population can walk [49]. While it is generally assumed that walk ing function recovery plateaus after 3 months, there is some evidence that rec overy may continue up to 2 years (using gait speed as the outcome measure) [50, 51]. Nonetheless, residual walk ing impairments last several months to years after the acute onset. Further, these residual impairments limit walking performance [52].

PAGE 22

22 Walking disability in the chronic phase While, in general, 85% of stroke survivors can walk by 6 m onths of stroke, the quality of walking remains impaired amongst most patients. Wa lking after a stroke is characterized by slow walking speed [53], poor endurance [54] and impaired mu scle coordination [55, 56]. Specifically, the impaired muscle coordination after post-stroke hemiparesis results in the characteristic asymmetrical nature of walki ng commonly referred to as Hemiparetic Gait. Furthermore, impaired muscle coordination after a stroke significantly limits the walking ability of persons and restricts their independent mobilit y about the home and community [57]. Further, difficulty in walking is associated with limited abili ty to return to work [ 58] and deterioration in the quality of life. Risk for falls while walking: Persons who have sustained a stroke are at a high risk for falling [59, 60]. Since gait and balance deficits are primary contributors to falls, risk for falling further increases significantly in those stroke survivors who are ambulatory and have balance deficits [61]. Consequently, a fa ll after a stroke compounds to the post-stroke disability. For most patients with stroke, functional walking ability is rarely regained even at the end point of their rehabilitation and several therapeutic interven tions are aimed at maximizing walking recovery. Nevertheless, there is a lack of targeted interventions to improve walking ability. In part, the problem is because walking impairments are not specifically quantif ied [62]. Therefore, quantification of walking impair ments is necessitated to assist in development of focused therapeutic strategies. Part 2: Asymmetry in Spatiotemporal Step Characteristics and Ground Reaction Forces during Hemiparetic Walking Inter[63] and intra-limb [64] coordinati on deficits are com monly observed during poststroke hemiparetic walking. These coordination deficits along with sensorimotor and motor

PAGE 23

23 control deficits result in the asymmetrical perf ormance after stroke. In fact, asymmetry in motor performance between the paretic and non-paretic le gs is a characteristic feature of hemiparetic gait [12, 65, 66]. In particular, spatiotemporal characteristics of steps and Ki netic (Ground Reaction Forces) parameters during walking are commonly used to characterize both overall walking performance and specifically asymmetrical performance. Spa tiotemporal step characteristics and kinetic parameters are most relevant to studies in this dissertation and therefore are reviewed below. Spatiotemporal Characteristics of Steps Spatial (i.e., length and width) a nd tem poral (i.e., timing of ev ents) characteristics of steps are commonly examined since they represent the final outcome of collective motions that contribute to walking [20, 67]. These parameters are also clinically releva nt since they are both easily observable and quantifiable. Figure 23 shows a common methodology for collecting spatiotemporal (ST) parameters during gait usi ng an instrumented walkway (GAITRite). Given the clinical relevance of the ST parameters of steps, characte rization of these parameters and quantification of underlying mechanisms during hemiparetic gait can provide useful insights regarding hemiparetic gait. The most consistently reported spatiotemporal parameter is slower walking speed. In 17 studies reporting gait speed, the average speeds ranged from 0.23 0.11 m/s [48] to 0.73 0.38 m/s [11]. The attainable maximal speed is also limited by functional limitations imposed due to the pathology of stroke [6]. Consistent with slower walking speeds, persons with hemiparesis take shorter stride leng ths and have lower cadence (number of steps taken per minute) compared to age-matched healthy adults [13, 68]. Slower gait speed after a stroke is also associated with a longer gait cycle duration [13, 68]. Further, the proportion of time spent in stance versus swing is

PAGE 24

24 also altered on both paretic and non -paretic sides, when compared to healthy adults walking at normal speeds [5, 13, 16]. While, gait speed or other unilateral measures reflect overall gait pe rformance; asymmetry in ST parameters of steps can reveal deficits in motor coordi nation between the paretic and nonparetic legs and the performance of the paretic leg relative to the non-pare tic. Literature specific to spatiotemporal asymmetry during hemiparetic gait is reviewed in the following paragraphs. Temporal asymmetry Asymm etries in temporal parameters of steps in persons who have sustained a stroke are well documented [12, 13] and have been consis tently related to disturbances in motor coordination [5]. In particular, it is reported that persons after a stroke spend longer time bearing weight on the stance phase of th e non-paretic leg than paretic [16] Further, stance phase of both paretic and non-paretic sides is l onger in duration and occupies a greater portion of the full gaitcycle [5] as compared to both age-matche d and speed-matched healthy adults [69]. Similarly, it is reported that pe rsons after a stroke spend long er time swinging their paretic leg, likely because they spend longer time bear ing weight on the non-paretic leg (i.e., longer stance time) [15]. This asymmetr y in swing time is reported to be a significant predictor of hemiparetic walking performance (since it strongly correlates with stag es of motor recovery, walking speed and falls) [13, 15]. Furthermore, a greater proportion of cycle time is spent in double support phase of the gait cycle during he miparetic gait. Particularly, of the two double support phases, relatively greater time is spent in the second double support of the paretic gait cycle (paretic pre-swing phase) than the nonparetic [5]. Furt her, Dequervain et al. (1996) reported that the paretic pre-swing phase was markedly prolonged for those persons who had very slow gait velocities [70]. Specifically, it is suggested that this prolonged paretic pre-swing duration indicates a poor progression of hip flexi on during swing phase of patients with slow gait

PAGE 25

25 velocity [69, 70]. In summary, several aspects of temporal asymmetry are well characterized in the literature and temporal asym metry has been consistently rela ted to poor motor performance during hemiparetic walking. Spatial asymmetry W hile temporal asymmetry is well characte rized and the direction of asymmetry is consistently reported in the literature, direc tion of spatial asymmetry varies across studies. It has earlier been reported that, after a stroke, patients may walk with either relatively longer paretic steps or longer non-paretic st eps [19, 65, 69]. In a study by Kim et. al. (2003), considerable variability in step length asymmetry was observed in a sample of 28 chronic stroke survivors. While 14 of these 28 participants walked with longer paretic steps than non-paretic, 14 others walked with relatively longer nonparetic steps. Dettman et al (1987) and Hsu et al. (2003) reported that while, on an average persons with stroke walked with longer paretic than nonparetic steps, step length patterns were inconsis tent within sub-groups of the population [65, 71]. Thus, it is unclear whether person s within the hemipare tic population walk with one or the other pattern or both. Furthermore, reasons for the variability in step length asymmetry patterns and relationship of these variable patterns to walking performance are unexplain ed. For example, Kim et al. (2003) hypothesized that the variability in patterns of step length asymmetry may be due to compensatory strategies that increase or decrease the step length of either paretic or non-paretic limb [19]. However, they were unable to advance the discussion since they found a nonsignificant relationship between step length symmetry and symmetr y in vertical ground reaction forces. Further, in a recent review article, Lamontagne and colleagues [53] suggest that an inconsistency in the direction of asymmetries between paretic and non-paretic legs is the result of differences in walking ability in the subjects, but they do not specifically report these differences.

PAGE 26

26 Another reason for insufficient understanding of the affect of step length asymmetry on hemiparetic walking performance is that the relationship between step length asymmetry and walking speed is not well documented in the cu rrent literature. For instance, shorter stride lengths (bilaterally) have been related to slower walking speed and thereby poor walking performance [70], and yet a non-significant relationship has been suggested between step length asymmetry and walking speed [19] Since kinetic characteristics represent the underlying causes for the kinematic and spatiotemporal patterns [72], it might be useful to examine the kinetic characteristics to quantify the step length asymmetry. Ground Reaction Forces in Hemiparetic Gait Ground reaction forces (GRFs), as measured by f o rce platforms, reflect the net vertical and shear forces acting on the surface of the platform [73]. Forces are exerted by the limbs (due to muscle activity) on the ground while a person walks and is recorded as the equal and opposite reaction force exerted by the for ce platforms in response (Figure 2-4). Mathematically, GRFs are the algebraic summation of the mass-acceleration products of all body segments while the foot is in contact with the platform [ 73]. The net GRF has three compone nts: Vertical, Horizontal and Mediolateral. The vertical force has a characte ristic double-hump (first related to weight acceptance and the second related to push-off), (F igure 2-4). The horizontal force has a negative phase in the first half of stance (indicating a net deceler ation or braking of the body) and a positive phase in the second half (indicati ng a net acceleration or propulsion of the body forward), (Figure 2-4). The vertical force curve is shown to be vari able across subjects and most commonly has an initial low peak. Carlsoo et al. (1974) reported three different patte rns of Vertical GRFs: 1) first peak during heel contact and s econd during push-off, 2) pattern showing continuous plateau, 3) pattern showing single peak in midstance [74] Kim et al (2003) further showed that the

PAGE 27

27 symmetry in vertical GRFs is accompanied by symmetry in temporal parameters but not in the symmetry of distance variable [19]. This is expect ed since the vertical GRFs primarily act on the vertical acceleration of the center of mass and symmetry in distance variables are likely related to a horizontal component of the GR F (i.e., Anterior-Posterior GRF). Conversely, Mediolateral GRFs during hemiparetic walking have not been systematically reported. Rogers and associates study on voluntary leg flexion movements in the hemi paretic persons provides some insight into the relevance of the M-L forces to stepping [75]. The results of their study revealed asynchrony and reversals in usual directions of lateral for ces, suggesting the inter-lim b coordination deficits in this population. In a recent study, A-P GRFs during hemiparetic walking was quantified for the first time [76]. Bowden et al. (2006) showed that anterior (propulsion) for ces by the paretic leg are reduced compared to the propulsive forces by the non-pare tic leg [76]. In this st udy, a measure from the A-P forces was developed that quan tified the coordinated ou tput of the paretic limb to the task of body propulsion during walking. This measure was re ferred to as paretic propulsion (Pp), which represented the percentage of total propulsion generated by the paretic leg during walking. Pp was also found to correlate with both wa lking speed and hemiparetic severity. Relevance of the Reviewed Literature to Study One Overall, current evidence sugge sts that persons after a stroke walk with different patterns of step length asymm etry that may be unrelated to the attained walking speed. However, these spatial asymmetries are not quantified and it is un clear how the different asymmetrical patterns relate to post-stroke hemiparetic walking perf ormance and why asymmetr y in step lengths may not necessarily limit the attained walking speed. Therefore, study one of this dissertation aimed at quantifying the step length asymmetry and explaining its relation to hemiparetic walking performance.

PAGE 28

28 Part 3. Intra-Subject Variability during Walking While variability during walking exists both be tween individuals (inter -subject) and within individuals (intra-subject), intr a-subject variability in the perform ance of tasks has received less attention [77]. Intra-subject vari ability during walking is the vari ation observed in an individuals walking performance (i.e., variability in steps fo r individual participants ). No two steps during walking are exactly similar and there is some natu ral variability from step to step [78]. Walking variability can be quantified usi ng spatiotemporal, kinematic, kinetic and EMG characteristics. Motor Control and Gait Variability Significance of gait variabil ity: theoretical app roach Walking is a rhythmical inter-limb coordina ted task and it is suggested that pattern generators located in the spinal cord generate the basic motor rhythm during walking [79]. These pattern generators are considered to be closely coupled for walk ing movements, suggesting little variability (stability) in the pattern of walking. Nevertheless, walking movements are not strictly rhythmical and emerge as a consequence of th e interaction of neural and mechanical dynamic systems, pattern generators, modulation from supr aspinal neural system and afferent modulation [80, 81]. These multiple modulation in the neur omuscular system may induce variability in walking movements. Walking, specifically, is an ex ample of flexible coordination where stability co-exists with the abundant variability in m ovements [82-84]. Further, the degree of the variability has also been linked to the health of a biological sy stem [78, 85], suggesting that impairments in gait might alter the variabilit y. In summary, coordinati on patterns like walking are highly flexible, being simu ltaneously stable and variable. Role of variability during walking The trad itional approach in motor control is to consider intra-subject variability as an index of noise in the sensorimotor sy stem [86]. More recently, positive aspects of movement variability

PAGE 29

29 have been proposed [87-89]. Such perspectives s uggest that variability in movement constitutes a pattern of stimulation. This pattern of stimula tion provides task-relevant information about the dynamical interaction between a person and the envi ronment [88]. There is also some indication that intra-subject motor variability can well predict performance of motor tasks and that variability is essential for many aspects of motor performance [86] Furthermore, stride-to-stride variability in gait parameters might reflect the in herent flexibility in the locomotor system [90] and therefore might be a re quisite for adaptability. Step-by-Step Variability in Spatiotemporal Characteristics Gait var iability is most commonly quantified as variability in spatiotemporal (ST) characteristics of steps. The concept of variabi lity within the ST parameters, its quantification and relation to falls risk is pres ented in Figure 2-5. Stride-to-stri de variability in stepping patterns during walking is consistently reported to be low in healthy persons [91, 92] during free unperturbed walking at natural walking speeds. Kinetic and EMG va riability is also reported to be low in healthy gait [93, 94], a lthough higher than variability in ST parameters of steps. The magnitude or degree of variability is commonly reported, using parameters like standard deviation (SD) [95, 96] and coefficien t of variation (CV) [97, 98]. However, recent studies suggest the use of measures that can qua ntify not only the magnit ude of variability, but also the structure of va riability (e.g. fractal dynamics of ga it rhythm) [99, 100]. In Study two of this dissertation, only the magnitude of variability will be evaluated. SD reflects the absolute varia tion of a parameter while CV, is the variability computed relative to the mean of the distribution [CV= standard deviation / m ean]. SD and CV are expected to correlate because they are mathematically derived similarly (i.e., CV is defined from SD). SD and CV are also reported to be correlat ed in patient populations [101]. There is no clear

PAGE 30

30 consensus in the literature regarding the measur e suited to quantify variability and there are few reports on reliability and validity of each of these measures. Advantages and disadvantages of gait variability measures: SD is reported to be unrelated to the mean of the parameter distribut ion [102] and therefore, might better quantify the absolute variation across parameters or when comparisons are made within variables across persons. In cases where comparis ons of variability are made acr oss parameters, CV might be more advantageous since it normalizes the variation in reference to the individual mean of each parameter distribution [86]. However, extremel y low parameter means can drive the CVs to infinity and thereby, suggest spuriously large variations. Step Variability as Quantifiable Marke rs of Impaired Walking Increased or decreased variability is co mmonly reported in populations with gait abnormalities like elderly fallers [103, 104], older frail adults [105] and persons with neurodegenerative diseases (e.g, Parkinsons diseas e) [106, 107], suggesting that gait variability strongly associates with gait impairments. It is also suggested that alteration in ga it variability is specific to pathology and that healthy aging might not a lter gait variab ility [108]. Step variability and its rel ation to gait impairments: Altered gait variability has been strongly related to walk ing impairments and is suggested to be a quantifiable biomechanical marker to evaluate impaired performance [77]. Increased gait variability has been related to slower gait speed and poor c ognitive status in adult fallers [77, 96, 109]. Similarly, central nervous system impairments (like cognitive f unctioning and motor performance) have been related to increased stan ce time variability [110], while decreased step width variability has been related to sensory impairments and balan ce deficits during walking [104, 110, 111]. Gait variability is also suggested to predict mobility disability [110]. Increa sed gait variability has also been related to risk for falls, implying that excess variability in steps might relate to balance

PAGE 31

31 impairments [101]. Further, there is a strong sugges tion in the literature that altered (increased or decreased) variability in steps is directly related to dynamic ba lance impairments since altered variability has consistently shown to predict the ri sk for both past and future falls and those falls specific to walking [77, 96, 101, 103]. Direction of alteration in gait variability: Motor control theories (like older hierarchical models and more recent dynamical systems theo ries) support both views of increased and decreased step variability as being beneficial to walking. While older motor control theories suggest that increased motor variability is reflective of decreased motor skill, more recently positive aspects of movement variability have been proposed [86]. It is suggested that stride-tostride variability in gait parame ters might reflect the inherent abundance of the locomotor system and therefore might be a requis ite for adaptability [90]. Variability in step characterist ics like step length, swing time, stride time and stance time is consistently reported to increase during impaired gait [96, 98, 103, 106, 112]. However, there is no clear consensus on the direct ion of alteration in step widt h variability and studies report both increase [91, 112] and decrease in step wi dth variability [96, 98, 113 ] in populations with altered gait patterns. For exam ple, while results of the st udy in healthy elderly population reported that step width variabil ity increased [95], Brach et al (2001) and Maki et al. (1997) reported that older adults with a history of falls show decreased step wi dth variability [96, 98]. Brach et al. (2005) also showed th at there is an optimal variability in step width that might be required and that either too little or too much vari ability might be related to falls risk [104]. One of the reasons for the inconsistency in the literatur e regarding step width variability is due to the differences in the way step width is defined across studies, population groups tested and the testing environment [114] [96].

PAGE 32

32 Relevance of Reviewed Literature to Study Two While alterations in step characteristics duri ng walking are frequently reported (as shorter step lengths, spatiotem poral asymmetries), characterization of gait variability may provide quantifiable measures to evaluate additional aspects of impaired performance (like dynamic balance and risk for falls) post-st roke. Further, in the stroke population, it is unclear whether there would be an asymmetry in step variab ility and how this might relate to walking performance. With the current s uggestion in literature regardi ng the association between step variability and walking impairments, it seems that characterization of variability in step characteristics will provide insights into moto r and balance control mechanisms in a stroke population. Further, investigation of the relati onship between stepping asymmetry and step variability would help determine those persons with asymmetry showing specific performance deficits (as evaluated by their step variability). Therefore, study two of this dissertation characterized the step-by-step va riability in ST characteristic s and explained its relation to hemiparetic walking performance. Part 4. Foot Placement in a Body Reference Frame One of the essential tasks during gait is appropriate positioning of the foot relative to the body [115]. Especially, placement of the foot at the end of swing phase serves to establish a stable base of support such that the body can progress forward efficiently during walking. Therefore, foot placement is closely relate d to trunk/upper body move ments and vice versa. Biomechanical models of trunk movements and foot positions/placements during walking have been earlier presented [114, 116-119]. However, a ssumptions of these models are validated mainly in healthy young subjects and not in neurologically impaired popu lations. Investigation of foot placement in a body reference frame (i .e., relative to the body) in a hemiparetic population can directly assist in examination of parameters underlying generation of a step.

PAGE 33

33 Defining Foot Placemen t Relative to Body Note that sp atiotemporal characteristics of step s that were discussed earlier in this literature review specifically refer to kine matics of one foot as defined rela tive to the other foot (e.g., the spatiotemporal parameter of step length is defined as anterior distance from the leading foot to the trailing foot). Specifically, F oot placement refers to the position of the foot in a step relative to the body. For example, anterior foot position at heel strike relative to the body indicates the instance at which foot was placed anterior to the body in a step. Control of Foot during Gait While basic lim b movements are primarily dete rmined by central pattern generators [79], animal studies suggest that movements of the foot during gait are further fine-tuned and regulated by cortical control [120, 121]. The cortical infl uences on foot during walking contribute to the adaptability of the gait pattern [122, 123]. It is widely accepted that the coordination of multiple degrees of freedom involved in locomotion is constrained by the central nervous system through a small number of be havioral units [79, 124-126]. In human walking, studies also indicate that while control of foot is implemented by ankle, knee and hip rotations, the dynamics of the foot are cen trally coded to generate the coordinated movements of stance and swing phase [127, 128]. David Winter proposed that foot kinematics is a precisely controlled sensorimotor task and is under the multisegmental motor control of both stance and swing phase [127, 128]. Control of the foot during gait can also be understood within the premise of the motor equivalence theory, where a given invariant ta sk goal (as foot cleara nce or foot trajectory) can be achieved through va riable means [129, 130]. Body Center of Mass Position and Velocity : P ostulated Link to Foot Placement Approximately two-thirds of our body mass (head, arm, trunk), which dominates the calculation of the center of mass position, is precar iously balanced over the two legs. Such a

PAGE 34

34 postural state imposes critical demands on the ba lance control system [131]. Unlike upright weight-bearing postures where balance is maintain ed when the vertical projection of body center of mass falls (COM) within the base of support (BOS), stability during locomotion is challenged because both BOS and COM are in motion [132, 133]. COM is within the BOS only during the two double support phases, which constitutes only 20% of a stride [132, 133]. During walking, COM is controlled by support forces generated from the legs [132, 133]. Di rection and point of application of support forces prov ided from the ground acts at the cen ters of pressure on the foot during the stride cycle. Foot placement at th e end of each swing phase provides the primary method of moving the COP in both sagittal a nd frontal plane [132, 133]. Thus, one of the essential functions of foot position relative to body is to maintain the position of COM with respect to the BOS such that dynamic bala nce during walking is maintained [134]. COM velocity during walking: Townsend proposed, through simulation analyses, that stable gaits can be defined by foot placements which are a linear function of the position and velocity of body center of mass at the time of foot placement [ 117]. Especially during walking, the COM velocity, in addition to COM displacement, needs to be considered. Pai and group demonstrated that balance may be impossible if COM velocity is directed outward, even if the COM is above the BOS [135, 136]. As a refinement of this rule, Hof et al. (2007) recently showed that the COM position plus its velocity (extrapolated COM: xCOM ) should be within the base of support [137]. They also suggested a measur e of stability the margi n of stability, which is the minimum distance from the xCOM to BOS [137]. Foot Placement Relative to Body a nd its Relation to Walking Sub-tasks Appropriate foot kinem atics re lative to body is essential to maintain functional sub-tasks during gait. In the stance phase, body center of mass is propelled with in limits of the foot placed (to avoid falling). In the swing phase, trajectory of the foot needs to be appropriately controlled

PAGE 35

35 such that foot positioning at the end of the sw ing phase is appropriately timed and placed. Foot placement relative to body is also related to minimization of energy, conservation of forward momentum or compensation for some musculos keletal deficit [118]. Therefore, given the importance of appropriate kinema tics of the foot to maintain smooth and efficient locomotion, it seems that investigation of foot kinematics during hemiparetic walking will serve as a tool to investigate the unique impairments in this population. Balance during gait, involves controlling m ovement of the whole body COM relative to the BOS (often defined as the area enclosed between the foot placem ents) [132]. Thus, as explained earlier, one of the esse ntial roles of foot placement dur ing gait is believed to be in determining a new base of support at each step and thereby, maintaining the dynamic balance during walking. Foot placements relative to the body and its rela tionship to the maintenance of walking balance have earlier been explained in healthy gait [116-119]. Redfern and Schuman in 1994 postulated that foot placement requires symmetry of the limbs with respect to the pelvis at heel cont act such that the body cen ter of mass is placed equidistant from both feet during double suppor t, creating a stable support base during the transition to the next step [ 118]. Mackinnon et al. (1993) and To wnsend MA (1981) showed that the most important factor affecting frontal whole body balance is the mediolateral foot placement relative to the center of mass established at initial contac t [116, 134]. Therefore, these studies suggest that foot placement relative to body is closely related to dynamic balance during gait. Relevance of Reviewed Literature to Study Three Post-stroke, quantifying where the fo ot is pl aced relative to body could provide a deeper understanding of the mechanisms of hemiparetic walking than is possible when foot kinematics alone are known (as when it is de fined relative to other foot). Fo r example, in persons who take asymmetrical step lengths (relative ly longer or shorter paretic step lengths), it is unclear whether

PAGE 36

36 their foot placements relative to pelvis (or trunk) would also be asymmetrical. Further, since the above literature review suggested that foot placement relative to body is also related to motor and dynamic balance control mechanisms during walk ing, we expected that investigation of foot placement relative to body would provide insights into motor control impairments during hemiparetic walking. Therefore, st udy three of this dissertation quantified asymmetrical stepping post-stroke in a body reference frame and explained its relati onship to hemiparetic walking performance measures. Part 5. Pre-Swing and Swing Ph ase during He miparetic Gait During walking, pre-swing of gait precedes the generation of a step and swing phase occurs as the leg is stepping. Therefore, it is likely that several parameters (muscle activity, kinetics and kinematics) that determine the pre-swing and swing phase of walking directly affect where the foot is placed in the step. Conseque ntly, investigation of mechanisms underlying the generation of the pre-swing and swing phase during hemiparetic walking are likely to enable the evaluation of the underlying cause s of generation of stepping. Introduction to Pre-Swing and Swing Phase during Gait In healthy gait, pre-swing phase occupies 10% of the gait cycle and is more comm only referred to as the second double support [67]. Swing phase occupi es 40% of the gait cycle and begins as the foot takes-off from the ground and ends when the foot strikes the ground again [20, 67]. Essential function of the pre-swing phase is to propel the trunk forward in preparation of leg swing initiation [138, 139]. Essential functions of the swing phase include limb clearance from the floor, advancement and forward progression of the leg and positioning the foot at the end of swing phase in preparation for st ance phase weight-bearing [20, 67]. Swinging motion of the leg is often like ned to the unforced swinging of a compound pendulum, suggesting that swing phase is a ra ther passive phenomenon [140, 141]. Furthermore,

PAGE 37

37 activity in the leg muscles duri ng swing is low [142, 143] and join t torques in the hip, knee and ankle are also small in the swing phase relative to the stance of walking [144]. Nevertheless, while joint torques are small in the swing phase they cannot be disregarded [145-147]. Furthermore, muscle activity is consistently reported during the swing phase of walking suggesting the active constraints during sw ing [139, 148, 149]. Most importantly, precise trajectory of the swinging limb and adequate cl earance of the limb need to be planned and optimized for efficient locomotion [128, 150]. It is also suggested that the swing phase of walking is under fine regulation by the higher corti cal centers in the central nervous system (that are mediated by spinal and in terneuronal networks) [151]. Kinematic Characteristics during Pre-Swing and Swing Phase Pelvis ex cursions: Increased pelvic hiking during swing [ 152] to clear the paretic foot and large lateral pelvis displacements [153] related to impaired side-to-side balance [154] are most commonly reported in hemiparetic gait. Dequervain et al. (1996) also reported that the pelvis was retracted at terminal swing in eleven of the 12 particip ants with slow gait speed and posteriorly tilted throughout swing [70]. Hip excursions: Decreased pre-swing hip extension (b ilaterally), decreased paretic hip flexion (attributed primarily to slower speed) in mid-swing and at terminal swing have been consistently observed in hemiparetic gait [16, 70] Dequervain et al. (199 6) also reported that there was a delay in initiation of paretic hip flexion at toe-o ff and progression of paretic hip flexion during swing, especially in those persons walking at extr emely slow walking speeds [70]. Paretic hip circumduction to clear the foot is also commonly reported in pers ons with stroke [18]. Paretic hip is also shown to be excessively a bducted and externally rotated during the swing phase [152].

PAGE 38

38 Knee excursions: Knee flexion at pre-swing and duri ng swing phase is crucial for toe clearance, which is the primary function of sw ing phase during gait [155]. In hemiparetic gait, reduced paretic knee flexion during swing [ 16, 156, 157] is most commonly observed. Reduced paretic knee flexion at pre-swi ng [69] and slow progression of paretic knee flexion during the swing phase [70] have also been observed. Ankle excursions: In hemiparetic gait, paretic ankle plantarflexion during pre-swing and ankle dorsiflexion during swing [16, 70, 152, 156] are substantially reduced. Further, Kim et al. (2004) reported that the paretic ankle remains in a relatively plantarflexed position even during terminal swing [18]. Paretic ankl e plantarflexion at toe-off is reported to be reduced, especially, in those persons with stroke walkin g at slower walking speeds [70]. Kinetic Characteristics durin g Pre-Sw ing and Swing phase Moments, Powers, Angular velocities Even in healthy gait, m oments, joint torque s and powers are substantially reduced in the swing phase compared to the stance. Therefore, most studies on healt hy and hemiparetic gait report either peaks or averages in these kinetic characteristics. This limits the understanding of kinetic characteristics specifically in the swing phase of hemiparetic gait. There is general consensus that most moments and power bursts are reduced in amplitude throughout the gait cycle in persons with stroke compared to both age-matched [157] and speed-matched healthy adults [158, 159]. Further, the reductions are report ed to be greater on the paretic side than nonparetic [158, 159]. There is much variation in the kinetic (see appe ndix for definition of kinetics) profiles of persons with stroke [18]. In general, different kinetic strategies can be used to achieve similar kinematic outcomes, increasing the challenge in th e quantification of sub-groups that might have specific strategies within the stroke population [160].

PAGE 39

39 Hip, knee, ankle power bursts during swing: In healthy gait, power bursts in the swing phase involve the A2 ankle burst (by concentr ic plantarflexor activity ) during pre-swing and early swing, K3 knee burst (by concentric extensor activity) during pre-swing and early swing, K4 knee burst (by eccentric flexor activity) and H3 hip burst (by concentric flexor activity) occurring in pre-swing and ear ly swing [94, 131, 161]. See Figure 2-6 for explanation of these power profiles. In hemiparetic gait, it is observe d that A2 burst is subs tantially reduced on the paretic side in slow walkers [5]. Whereas, for th ose who walk fast, K3 burst is reported to be even greater than normal on the non-paretic side [5]. Similar to the A2 burst, H3 burst is reported to be considerably reduced on the paretic side [5]. Therefore, the amplitude of these kinetic variables seems to be positively scaled to the gait speed or functional capacity of persons with stroke [158, 159, 162, 163]. Inter-compensations between hip and ankle powers: Slow walkers especially present with a marked reduction in pre-swing ankle pus h-off (A2) and early swing hip pull-off (H3) [159] on both paretic and non-paretic sides. Contra rily, persons walking at faster walking speeds or higher functional capacities show less reduction in these power bursts and even present with larger positive work by bilateral hip extensors in early stance (H1) and by early swing paretic hip flexors (H3) [158, 159]. The greater magnitude of hip bursts (H1 and H3) can assist in propulsion, compensating for the reduction in ankl e push-off (A2) in persons with stroke who walk fast [158, 159]. Similarly, larger K3 burst is reported in the fast walkers [158, 159]. Thus, several kinetic asymmetries are acc entuated between limbs in the fast walkers, suggesting that locomotor capacity is not necessarily recovered through normalization of kinetic profiles but may be directly related to compensatory mechanisms [53]. In the literature, this result is usually interpreted to mean that symmetry should not be a primary focus for rehabilitation [5, 18, 53].

PAGE 40

40 However, investigation and diffe rentiation of impairment from compensation is essential to retrain function maximally. Identification of impairment, on the other hand, will assist in normalization of some of the underlying kinetics (e.g., improving the paretic ankle plantarflexor force generation to improve paretic ankle power burst). Angular velocity of knee in pre-swing determines knee flexion during swing: With regards to angular velocity, dynami c simulations of swing phase in healthy gait performed in the absence of muscle joint torques approximated normal knee kinematics by selecting the initial angular velocities and positions alone [140, 164]. This suggests that the initia l angular velocity is an important determinant of normal knee kine matics during swing. Further, Piazza and Delp (1996) found that the amount of knee flexion ac hieved during swing is decreased by either increasing hip flexion velocity or decreasing kn ee flexion velocity at pre-swing [145]. In hemiparetic gait, Chen et al. (2005) showed that persons with stroke showed impaired paretic swing initiation that they char acterized as inadequate paretic limb propulsion in pre-swing, reduced paretic knee flexion at toe-off and mid-swing [69]. Interjoint coordination during swing phase She mmell and associates (2007) recently showed that dynamic torques generated across hip, knee and ankle are tightly coupled during swing phase of normal gait and that a single kinetic time series can describe the pattern of torque production at each joint during this phase [165]. They proposed that such a flexible inter-joint coupling might serve to simplify the control of the swing phase by the CNS. Inter-joint coordination during swi ng is also revealed indirectly through studies, which report that an increase in hip flexor mome nt during swing also increases knee flexion [166]. Some inter-joint coordination is also expected given that bi-articular muscles that span two joints are physiolo gically capable of affecting segm ents further distally. Further,

PAGE 41

41 the complex inter-segmental dynamics of the body can also explain the in ter-joint coordination of kinetics in the swing phase [167, 168]. Muscle Activity during Pre-Swing and Swing Phase Pre-sw ing and swing phase muscle activity in healthy gait: Although low, muscle activity is consistently reported in swing phase of healthy gait. In general, hip flexors have shown to dominate swing phase [169-171]. Specifica lly, Nene et al. (1999) and Neptune et al. (2001) show that rectus femoris (RF) is respon sible for swing initiation [139, 148]. Furthermore, medial gastrocnemius (MG) is also suggested to aid in swing initiation [148]. On the other hand, Gotschall and Kram (2005) based on their novel methodology of application of external forces during treadmill walking, showed that while both iliopsoas (IP) and RF initiate and propagate swing, ankle extensors do not di rectly contribute to swing init iation [172]. Further, indirect evidence of specific contributions of muscular acti vity in swing phase is revealed in the study by Goldberg et al. (2003) where they evaluate musc les that influence knee flexion velocity in the pre-swing phase (knee flexion ve locity directly influences knee kinematics during swing) [173]. Goldberg et al. (2003) in their study conclude that while MG and IP directly contribute to swing by increasing the knee flexion velocity in pre-swing, vastii, RF and soleus decrease knee flexion velocity thereby reducing knee flexion in swing [173]. Further, Winter DA (1992) suggested that Tibialis anterior (ankle dorsiflexor) were specifically re quired during mid-swing for limb clearance, whereas biarticular hamstrings (long h ead of biceps femoris) decelerates the limb in terminal swing to prepare it for weight acceptance [128]. Pre-swing and swing phase muscle activity in hemiparetic gait: There are much fewer reports on muscle activity in pre-swing and swing phase of hemiparetic gait. In general, large interindividual variability is observed in the EM G patterns that characterize muscle activity in individual patients. Den Otter et al. (2007) reports that paretic TA activity significantly increases

PAGE 42

42 in the swing phase of persons with stroke comp ared to healthy persons [174]. Further, since EMG activity can be observed as premature activation, abnormal coactivation or as compensatory or adaptive coactivation, it is diffi cult to suggest whether observed muscle activity is a sign of impaired motor control or adap tive behavior to prom ote functional walking. Nevertheless, association of EM G activity to walking performan ce might provide insights into the role of observed activity. Relevance of Reviewed Literature to Study Four Overall, the above literature review suggests that several studies ha ve reported kinem atic, kinetic characteristics and muscle activity durin g pre-swing and swing of hemiparetic gait. Nevertheless, a holistic picture of control strategies in hemipa retic pre-swing and swing phase are lacking, primarily because pre-swing and sw ing phase dynamics have not been correlated with walking performance after hemiparesis. It is likely that events during the pre-swing and swing phase determine where the foot is placed in the step. Thus, patterns observed in these phases during hemiparetic gait might explain th e underlying reasons for the variability in stepping asymmetry. Therefore, in study four of this disserta tion specific pre-swing and swing phase variables were used to e xplain step length variability. Speci fically, selected kinematic and kinetic variables corresponding to initial conditions of the leg, swing phase and contralateral stance phase (occurring at the same instance as swing phase) explained step length generation during hemiparetic gait.

PAGE 43

43 Figure 2-1. A simplified model demons trating neural control of gait The central pattern generators in the spinal cord generates the locomotor rhythm that is modified by afferent information from the higher cente rs and the periphery. Abbreviations: CST Corticospinal Tract.

PAGE 44

44 Figure 2-2.Division of a gait cycle into phases The gait cycle is divided into stance (0 60 %) and swing (60-100%) phase. The stance phase can be further sub-divided into two double support phases (10% each) and a single support phase (40%). Source: http://www.vard.org/mono/gait/gaitcov.htm

PAGE 45

45 Figure 2-3.Methodology for collection of spatiotemporal characteristics during walking using an instrumented mat (GAITRite) GAITRite is an electronic walkway with sensors embedded within it that record the spatial and temporal characteristics of steps as a person walks over it. A sample walk that was recorded by GAITRite is presented in this Figure. Note the parameters generated by the software.

PAGE 46

46 Figure 2-4. Illustration of ground re action forces exerted by the limbs and typical force curves This Figure illustrates the 3-D forces applied to the ground from the legs (Fx, Fy, Fz) and the measured Ground reaction forces (Rx, Ry, Rz). Th e plots on the bottom demonstrate these GRF curves from the right (red) and left (blue) legs normalized to the body weight of the person for the three force components [Vertic al GRF (Rz), AP Anterior-posterior GRF (Ry), MLMedialLateral GRF (Rx)].

PAGE 47

47 Figure 2-5. Variability (i n stride time) during walking and its relation to risk for falls Source: Hausdorff, J. M. (2005), Gait va riability: methods, modeling and meaning. J Neuroengineering Rehabil, 2 19

PAGE 48

48 Figure 2-6. Power profiles in swi ng phase of a healthy gait cycle The swing phase begins at appr oximately 60% of the gait cycl e. The arrows show the power bursts in hip (H3), knee (K3) and ankle (A2) during swing phase of healthy gait. Red is right leg and blue is left leg.

PAGE 49

49 CHAPTER 3 RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN STEP LENGTH ASYMMETRY AND WALKING PERFORM ANCE IN SUBJECTS WITH CHRONIC HEMIPARESIS Introduction The asymmetrical nature of he miparetic walk ing is well documented in persons who have sustained a stroke, [12, 13, 175] with the asymmetr ies in spatiotemporal, kinematic and kinetic parameters of walking related to disturbances in motor coordination [5]. Specifically, asymmetry in spatiotemporal parameters have been common ly used in the clinic to examine the walking patterns in patients who have experienced a stroke [19]. Previous studies [13, 176] have reported that temporal (swing time) asymmetry is a si gnificant predictor of hemiparetic walking performance since it strongly correl ates with stages of motor r ecovery, walking speed and falls. However, the relationship between spatial (ste p length) asymmetry and hemiparetic walking performance is unclear. It has earlier been reported that, after a str oke, patients may walk with either relatively longer paretic steps or longer non-paretic steps [19, 65, 71]. Therefore, consiste nt patterns of step length asymmetry have not been observed. Moreove r, the reasons for the variability in step length asymmetry patterns and the relation of the variable patterns with walking performance have not yet been explained. For instance, in the study by Kim et al. (2003), considerable variability in step length asymmetry was observe d in a sample of 28 chronic stroke survivors [19]. While 14 of these subjects walked with longer paretic steps than non-paretic, 14 others walked with relatively longer non-paretic steps. Consequentl y, they hypothesized that the variability in the patterns of step length asymme try may be due to compensatory strategies that increase or decrease the step le ngth of either the paretic or non -paretic leg. However, they were unable to advance the discussion since they f ound a non-significant rela tionship between step length symmetry and symmetry in vertical ground r eaction forces. Further, other studies indicate

PAGE 50

50 that; on an average, individuals w ho have sustained a stroke walk with relatively longer paretic steps [65, 71]. Therefore, neither consistent pa tterns of step length asymmetry have been observed nor have the asymmetri cal patterns been characterize d. Further, the relationship between step length asymmetry and walking sp eed is not well documented in the current literature. This may be another reason for insufficient understanding of the affect of step length asymmetry on hemiparetic walking performance. Fo r instance, shorter stride lengths (bilaterally) have been related to slower walking speed and thereby poor walking performance [70], and yet a non-significant relationship has been suggested between step length asymmetry and walking speed [19]. Overall, curr ent evidence suggests that persons afte r a stroke may walk with different patterns of step length asymmetry that may be unrelated to the attained walking speed. However, it is not clear how the different asymmetrical patterns relate to post-stroke hemiparetic walking performance and why asymmetry in step lengths may not necessarily limit the attained walking speed. We propose that correlating the asymmetry obs erved in step lengths with propulsive ground reaction forces (GRFs) during walking ca n provide a basis to evaluate different asymmetrical patterns and their effect on hemi paretic walking performance. Propulsive GRFs represent the net forces generated by the legs to accelerate (propel) the bodys center-of-mass forward. The propulsive GRFs quantify forward pr opulsion during walking, which is an essential requirement of locomotion along with body support [27]. In our recent work, we have shown that the paretic leg propulsive GRFs can provide a quan titative measure of the coordinated output of the paretic leg during hemiparetic walking [76]. Specifically, we found that the percentage of propulsive forces generated by the paretic leg (Propulsion Paretic) can quantify the contribution of the paretic leg to the coordina ted task of forward propulsion during walking. In our present

PAGE 51

51 study, we hypothesized that the Propulsion Paretic would correlate with asymmetry observed in step lengths since generation of a step requires forces exerted by the legs to propel the bodys center-of-mass. Further, we suggest that correlating the asymmetry observed in step lengths with propulsive GRFs during walking can help understand the relations hip between spatial asymmetry and walking performance after a stroke. Therefore, the primary purpose of our study was to explore the correlation between step length asymmetry and propulsive forces in an attempt to quantify the affect of spatial asymmetry on post-stroke hemiparetic walking performance. Further, we investigat ed how asymmetrical step lengths may be related to hemiparetic se verity (as rated by Brunns trom staging), walking speed, vertical GRFs and other spatiotemporal walking parameters (walking speed, swing time, pre-swing time and ability to change speed) to gain a holistic understanding of the relationship between asymmetrical step lengths a nd hemiparetic walking performance. Methods Participants We recruited 49 subjects with chronic hem iparesis [42 men, 7 women; ages = 62.7 10.2 (SD) years; time since stroke = 4.25 3.67 (SD) years; affected side left = 25, right = 24] were recruited at the Palo Alto Depart ment of Veterans Affairs Medical Center. The data presented in this study were collected as part of a larger study that investigated the links between gait characteristics and bone density in chronic stroke survivors [177]. Inclusion criteria were: at least 6-12 months post stroke, uni lateral weakness, and the ability to walk 10 meters in 50 seconds or less without manual assi stance. Subjects were allowed to use their assistive devices (AFO and/or Cane) during the te sting. Subjects were excluded fr om the study if they had any orthopedic or neurological conditio ns in addition to the stroke, had more than one CVA incident

PAGE 52

52 and were unable to provide informed consent. Br unnstrom motor recovery stages were used to determine the severity of hemiparesis for the s ubjects [178]. Subjects varied in their ability to perform voluntary movements within and outside of flexor and extensor synergy patterns (as assessed clinically by Brunnstrom staging). Base d on their Brunnstrom stage, three groups of subjects with differing hemiparetic severity were identified. Subjects in the Severe hemiparesis group (Brunnstrom stage 3, n=19) were limited to movements within the synergy patterns (e.g., only basic limb flexion or extension synergies can be performed voluntar ily). Subjects in the Moderate hemiparesis group (Brunnstrom stag es 4-5, n=20) were able to produce some movement combinations outside of the synergy patterns. Subjects in th e Mild hemiparesis group (Brunnstrom stage 6, n=10) were able to produce both isolated joint movements and movements in synergy patterns. All participants in the study si gned a written informed consent and the Stanford Administrative Panel on Huma n Subjects in Medical Research approved the protocol. Procedures The subjects walked separately over the GAI TRite and force platform s at their selfselected and fastest safe speeds to collect the spatiotemporal parameters and GRFs, respectively. GAITRite (CIR Systems, Inc) is a portable in strumented electronic walkway 4.3 meter long and is a valid and reliable system for measuring spatiotemporal pa rameters [179]. Force platforms (Advanced Medical Technology, Inc) embedded acr oss a 10 m walkway were used to collect three-dimensional GRFs during the gait cycle. Be fore testing, clear expl anations were provided to the subjects regarding the importance of walk ing in their natural manne r during the testing and avoidance of targeting the force plates. Du ring GAITRite data collection, the GAITRite was placed over the force plates. However, the force pl ate data was not collected while subjects were walking on the GAITRite. Subjects started walki ng 5-6 steps before the GAITRite and stopped

PAGE 53

53 5-6 steps after passing the GAITR ite to get constant speed data over the mat and avoid the effects of acceleration and deceleration. Subjects walked a total distance of 10 meters over the GAITRite. Three good walking trials, each at self-sel ected and fastest safe speeds, were collected over the GAITRite. Some subjects were asked to wa lk 1 or 2 more trials due to problems like tripping during walking. The number of trials collect ed for the force plate da ta were variable and depended on whether both or at l east one leg were determined by visual inspection to have had adequate contact on the force pl atforms. GRF data were acquire d at 200 Hz and the horizontal and vertical forces (normalized to the indi viduals body weight) were used for analyses. A therapist provided close supervision during the walk ing trials. Subjects were allowed to take rests between trials if they needed to. Walki ng speed was calculated by the GAITRite and no estimates of speed were used from the force plate trials. Data Analyses GAITRite data: W e analyzed all the collected trials (3 for each speed). The data from individual trials were averaged together to determine the spatiotemporal variables for each participant. Spatiotemporal vari ables included in this study were self-selected and fastest walking speed, step lengths, swing times and pre-swing ti mes (time spent in double support phase of gait cycle). Paretic and Non-paretic step length, swin g time and pre-swing time data were averaged only from the trials of self-selected walking sp eed. Subjects self-selected walking speed were categorized as: speed < 0.4 m/s (household ambul atory); 0.4 0.8 m/s (limited community); and speed > 0.8 m/s (community ambulatory) [180]. St ep length asymmetry was quantified using a step length ratio (SLR), which was defined as the Paretic step length [181] divided by the Nonparetic step length [181]. The fastest safe walkin g speed data were utilized to calculate the percentage change (from self-selected to fastes t safe speeds) in walking speed, cadence, paretic step lengths, and non-pare tic step lengths.

PAGE 54

54 Force plate data: We collected a minimum of 4 tria ls and a maximum of 15 trials to assure adequate contact on the force platforms to determine the ground reaction force patterns for each participant. The GRF values that were analyzed for individual partic ipants were variable and depended on the number of trials with good f oot contacts on the force platforms. Good foot contacts were determined if both legs made c ontact with the force platforms in entirety. When possible, multiple good foot contacts were averag ed to generate ground re action force values, but in one participant, only one trial could be analyzed. Raw anterior posterior a nd vertical GRF data were normalized to body weight and processed using a custom Matlab program. Note th at anteriorly directed forces are propulsive (positive) and posteriorly direct ed forces are braking (negative) (Figure 3-1). The impulse for each leg was calculated as the time integral of the GRF (the area under the GRF curve) : Ixl = GRFxdt (Equation 1) where I = Impulse, force component x= v (vertical), p(propulsive) or b (braking) and leg l = p (paretic) or n (non-paretic). Paretic propulsion (Pp) was then calculated from the propulsive impulse: PP (%) = Ipp / (Ipp + Ipn) 100 Statistical Analyses A paired sa mple t-test was used to test wh ether the differences be tween the paretic and non-paretic step length were sta tistically significant. Relationships between the step length asymmetry (SLR), GRFs and walking speed we re characterized using Pearsons correlation coefficient (r) and that between SLR and he miparetic severity using the non-parametric Spearmans correlation coefficient ( ). For other walking variab les included in the study, descriptive analyses were conducted to understa nd their relationship with the asymmetrical patterns. All statistical analyses were performed with SPSS 12.0 software.

PAGE 55

55 Results The walking variables were collected at the self-selected walking speeds for all subjects and at the fastest safe speeds for 46 subjects. Da ta were not collected for 3 subjects at their fastest speeds due to safety conc erns. Nineteen of the 49 subjects used a mobility aid [i.e., a cane or an ankle foot orthosis or both] to ambulate. Paired sample t-tests revealed that the paretic step lengths were significantly different from the non-pa retic step lengths (p = .0001). Therefore, step length asymmetry was characterized and three patte rns of step length asymmetry were identified. The symmetrical group were defined as subjec ts with SLR between 0.9 to 1.1 [SLR = 1 0.1 (10%) SD]. Asymmetrical groups were those with SLR > 1.1 (longer paretic steps than nonparetic) and SLR < 0.9 (longer non-pa retic steps than paretic). Relationship between Step Length Asymmetry (SLR) and GRFs Correlation analys is revealed a strong negative correlation between SLR and Pp with Pp explaining 62 % (r = 0.785, p < 0.001) of variance in step length asymmetry (Table 3-1). Subjects that demonstrated impaired paretic leg propulsion (Pp) and in creased non-paretic leg propulsion walked asymmetrically with longer paretic steps th an non-paretic [Figure 3-2, top tracing]. In contrast, subjects generating symmetrical GRFs with the two legs walked nearly symmetrically [Figure 3-2, middle tracing]. Subj ects generating rela tively proportionate or greater Pp walked asymmetrically with longer non-paretic steps than paretic. However, the greater Pp generated by these subjects walking with longer non-paretic steps was lesser in magnitude compared to those walking symmetric ally. Refer to Figure 3-2 and compare the Pp between GRF curves of the bottom and middle tracing. Asymmetrical group with longer paretic step lengths than non-paretic (n = 16): Subjects that generated the leas t paretic propulsion (Pp < 20%) walked with relatively longer

PAGE 56

56 paretic step lengths. Five of these 16 subjects generated 5% or less Pp and walked with the longest paretic steps relativ e to the non-pare tic leg (SLR > 1.5) (Figure 3-3). Asymmetrical group with longer non-paretic step lengths than paretic (n = 4): There were only 4 subjects who were classified as asymmetric and walked with relatively longer nonparetic step lengths. Three of these four subjects generated substantial prop ulsive forces with the paretic leg (Pp > 55%; however one s ubject generated only 25% Pp). Symmetrical group (n = 23): Twenty-three subjects walked symmetrically. Seventeen of these 23 subjects generated almost symmetrical propulsive forces (Pp = 35 57 %) and the rest generated lesser paretic leg propulsion (Pp = 15 30%). Only 10 of 49 subjects in th e study population generated a ne t braking impulse in the preswing (normally propulsive) phase of the gait cy cle and these 10 subjects walked at SLR > 1.1, with 5/10 subjects walking at SLR > 1.5. Nine of these 10 subjects used a mobility aid for ambulation and only one subject walked independe ntly. We separately analyzed the data for subjects who used a mobility aid from those w ho did not to investigate whether the relationship between step length asymmetry and paretic leg propulsion changed by using a mobility aid. Subjects walking with a mobility aid generated less Pp in comparison to those who walked without one. However, the relationship between SL R and Pp was not different for those who did or did not use a mobility aid. With respect to the vertical GRF, all subject s (irrespective of their step length asymmetry pattern) supported a greater percentage of body we ight on the non-paretic le g than the paretic leg during the two double support phases in the gait cy cle. However, moderate correlations (r = 0.447, p < .001) were found only between SLR and pe rcentage of body wei ght supported on the paretic leg during the pre-swing phase of the paretic leg (Table 3-1).

PAGE 57

57 Relationship between Asymmetrical Step Le ngths, Hemiparetic Severity and Walking Speed While SLR correlated weakly with walking speed (r = -0.351, p < .05), a stronger correlation existed between SLR and hem iparetic severity ( = -.526, p < .001) (Table 3-1). Eleven out of the 19 subjects with severe hemi paresis walked asymmetrically with relatively longer paretic steps than non-pare tic and yet walked at differing walking speeds (Figure 3-4). Note that 4 subjects with severe hemiparesis that walked asy mmetrically with longer paretic steps generated much less paretic leg propulsion (Pp < 25%) and yet walked at speeds greater than 0.8 m/s (community ambulatory) [180], (Figure 3-4). In contrast, the 3 subjects (Figure 3-4) with mild hemiparesis (Stage 6) who walked symmetrically or asymmetrically (with longer nonparetic steps) generated much greater paretic leg propulsion (Pp 45%) and yet walked at slower speeds between 0.4 0.8 m/s (limited community ambulatory) [180]. Relationship between Step Length Asymmetry, Time Spent in Pre-Swing and Swing Time Only 8 of 49 subjects spent greater than 20% of cycle tim e during the paretic pre-swing phase (compared to 10-20% cycle time in their non-paretic pre-swing). These 8 subjects walked asymmetrically with longer paretic steps than non-paretic. With respect to swing time, only 2 of 49 subjects spent greater time sw inging their paretic than the nonparetic leg. Subjects walking at SLR > 1.1, on an average, spent the gr eatest time swingi ng their paretic leg. Relationship between SLR, Change in Gait Speed and Parameters That Contribute to Change in Speed Absolute m ean differences were evalua ted for these analyses. Subjects walking symmetrically increased paretic and non-paretic step lengths and cadence at faster walking speeds. In contrast, those walking asymmetrically at SLR > 1.1 had little increase in their paretic step length at the faster walking speeds even th ough they increased their cadence as much as the symmetrical group (Figure 3-5).

PAGE 58

58 Discussion Relationship between Step Length Asymmetr y and Propulsive Forces during Hemiparetic Walking Step length asymm etry during wa lking is related to propulsive forces generated by persons with hemiparesis. Our data revealed that subject s generating relatively le sser propulsive forces with the paretic leg walked as ymmetrically with longer pareti c steps than non-paretic (SLR > 1.1) On the other hand, subjects walking symm etrically (0.9 < SLR < 1.1) generated near symmetrical propulsive forces with the two legs. In Figure 3-2 comparison of PP between subjects with SLR > 1.1, 0.9 < SLR < 1.1 and SLR < 0.9 indicates that there may be distinct differences in paretic leg propul sion between subjects with diffe rent patterns of step length asymmetry. To our knowledge, there is little direct evid ence for the mechanisms that control step length in normal and hemiparetic walking. However, indirect evidence for the control of step length during walking is provided by a few studi es. Varraine et al. (2000) suggests two potential controlling mechanisms for intentio nally lengthening a stride in he althy individual s: control of trunk progression and control of le g trajectory [182]. In their study, subjects were able to lengthen their stride by generati ng greater propulsive forces. The increased propulsive forces enabled the trunk to progress further forward a nd thereby, generate a l onger step. Additionally, subjects took a longer step by holding the leg long er in the swing phase. Fu rther, recent studies have highlighted the causa l relationships between muscle activity in pre-swing and the resulting swing leg trajectory [148, 183, 184]. These studies indicate that kine matics of the leg in its preswing phase affect trajectory of the leg in its swing phase and thereby, magnitude of the step length. This implies that the le g producing greater forward propul sion in pre-swing might take the longer step length. However, the results from our study suggest the op posite. We showed that

PAGE 59

59 persons generating impaired paretic leg propulsion walked with a relatively longer paretic step. These persons generating impaired paretic leg propulsion also generate d relatively greater nonparetic propulsion, likely to compensate for th e lesser paretic leg propu lsion. For example, in Figure 3-2, compare the relative contributions of non-paretic propulsion in the top and middle GRF tracings. These results suggest that a high SL R (i.e., paretic step le ngth > non-paretic step length) is in large part the re sult of the relatively greater non-paretic leg propulsion. For instance, greater forward propulsion by the non-paretic leg in its stance phase will cause the trunk, including the pelvis to move forward. This fo rward motion of the pelvis will increase with increased propulsion and can cause the swinging paretic leg to move forward relative to the ground even if it moves little rela tive to the pelvis. Therefore, greater non-paretic leg propulsion is one mechanism for the longer paretic steps (high SLR). Further, pers ons with high SLR also spent a longer time swinging thei r paretic leg than others who walked with symmetrical steps. Therefore, one might hypothesize either/both gr eater non-paretic leg propulsion or a longer paretic swing phase as potential candidates to explain the mechanisms underlying a relatively longer paretic step length. The strong relationship between the patterns of step length asymmetry and propulsive force asymmetry might suggest a mechanical relation between step length and propulsive force. For example, if the leg were to be an invert ed pendulum, the generation of horizontal forces would be directly related to the position of the foot relative to the bodys center-of-mass. Specifically, foot placement anterior to the cente r-of-mass (as during heel strike) would induce a braking force and foot placement posterior to the center-of-mass (as in pre-swing phase) would induce a propulsive force. In this sense, an asymmetry in the placement of the feet may induce asymmetrical propulsive forces when the foot is placed more anterior to the center-of-mass than

PAGE 60

60 posterior. However, the inability to place th e foot further behind the center-of-mass than forwards (as with longer paretic steps than non-pa retic) suggests specific impairments underlying the asymmetrical step lengths. For example, the inability to achieve adeq uate hip extension may limit the propulsive forces exerte d during the terminal stance. Furthermore, during the terminal stance of the paretic stride the paretic foot is likely posterior to the body s center-of-mass and yet there is no propulsive force genera ted (see Figure 3-2, top tracing). Therefore, it is more likely that there may be an active reduction in pr opulsive force generation. The active reduction in propulsive force generated in the pre-swing may, in turn, suggest impaired uniarticular ankle plantarflexor activity [148]. On the contrary, in the participants walking with relatively shorter paretic steps (SLR < 0.9), the greater paretic propulsive force generati on suggests that plantar flexors may be providing reas onable propulsion. Ste pping, however, depends not only on the ability of the plantarflexors to propel the body forward but also on the ability of the hip flexors to generate power to the swinging leg [184]. Ther efore, having shorter paretic steps relative to non-paretic steps may indicate an inability to ad vance the paretic leg due to impaired swing initiation by the hip flexors. In addition to di rect mechanical effect s of foot placement on propulsive force generation, it is likely that the mechanisms underlying asymmetrical steps reflect distinct muscular impairments that de termine the observed patterns of step length asymmetry during hemiparetic walking. Future studi es targeted at inves tigating the underlying muscular impairments shall further determin e the underlying causes for high SLR. Yet, the strong relationship between SLR and propulsion can be utilized in the clinic as a tool to distinguish persons in their ab ility to generate propulsive forces. Beyond simply promoting symmetry, SLR can be utilized to develop indivi dual goals that train pr opulsive force production,

PAGE 61

61 equalize bilateral biomechanical involvement by improving hip ex tension, or promote paretic step initiation. Relationship between Step Length Asymmetr y, Walking Speed and Hemiparetic Severity W e were also able to investigate the re lationship between walking speed, hemiparetic severity and asymmetry in step lengths. A weak relationship between step length asymmetry and walking speed was observed, indicating that asymme trical patterns need not necessarily limit the attained walking speed. However, hemiparetic se verity (as rated by Brunnstrom staging) seemed to predict step length asymmetry since the majority of subjects with severe hemiparesis walked asymmetrically at SLR > 1.1. Furthermore, differen ces in Pp between the persons with mild and severe hemiparesis were unrelated to the attain ed walking speed. For example, in Figure 3-4, four subjects with severe hemiparesis had impair ed Pp and yet they were walking at speeds > 0.8 m/s. In contrast, three subjects with mild hemiparesis generated greater Pp and yet walked at slower speeds between 0.4-0.8 m/s. The weak re lation between Pp and walking speed indicates that other compensatory mechanisms could help some persons to attain a relatively functional walking speed. Quantification of these compensatory mechanisms may be difficult when speed alone is the outcome measure since walking speed is the net outcome of the two legs. However, asymmetrical step lengths might indicate compensation in those persons walking with a high SLR and faster walking speeds compared to thos e walking with a high SLR and slower walking speeds. This is because subjects with relatively lo nger paretic steps would have lesser paretic leg propulsion, and if they continue to walk at faster speeds they mi ght accomplish these speeds via compensatory strategies. For example, one of the ways to attain a faster speed (i.e., acceleration of the bodys center-of-mass) would be to generate greater propulsive for ces with the non-paretic leg that serves to accelerate the center-of-mass fo rward. Other compensations can also arise from

PAGE 62

62 the paretic leg itself or from the trunk (e.g., forwar d lean) to attain rela tively functional walking speeds despite decreased propulsive force with the paretic leg. Relationship between Step Length Asymmetry, Paretic Pre-Sw ing Time and Vertical GRFs Furthermore, we were able to determine th e relationship between step length asymmetry, other spatiotemporal parameters and vertical GRFs. The evidence that impaired paretic leg function prolongs the paretic pre-swing phase su pports our finding that persons walking at SLR > 1.1 supported less weight on the paretic leg duri ng the pre-swing phase. This finding thereby increases the need to develop compensatory st rategies to overcome these deficits [70]. In particular, note that in our study we allowed partic ipants to walk naturally as they would in the community and 19 persons used some mobility aid for ambulation even during the testing. Although persons walking with a mobility aid generated less Pp in comparison to those who walked without one, the relati onship between SLR and PP did not change while analyzing only the data for those subjects who used an ai d or those who did not. This corroborated our hypothesis that a high SLR was related to specific problems in propelling the body forward with the paretic leg. However, the high SLR may neither necessarily limit the attained speed nor may substantially limit persons from changing their walking speeds. As revealed in Figure 3-5, compared to the symmetrical group persons with high SLR seemed to primarily increase their speed by increasing cadence with much less increase in the paretic step lengths. This indicates that persons walking with asymmetrical step leng ths may utilize different strategies to increase their walking speeds. Further, even though the subjects with SL R > 1.1 walked with relatively longer paretic steps than non-paretic at their self-selected walking speeds, they were unable to change the paretic step length as much as the non-paretic when changing their speed.

PAGE 63

63 Conclusions We were able to provide som e insights into the relationship between asymmetrical step lengths and hemiparetic walking performance. Asym metry in step lengths strongly relates to the propulsive forces generated by the paretic leg. Greater non-paretic leg pr opulsion to offset the impaired paretic propulsion is likely one of the m echanisms for the high SLR (paretic step length > non-paretic step length). Despite mechanical relations between foot placement and force generation that are expected, we believe that there are additional muscular impairments underlying the asymmetrical patterns. However, further research is warranted to confirm this. Yet, the strong relationship betw een SLR and propulsion can be ut ilized in the clinic as a measure to evaluate the propulsive forces genera ted by the paretic leg. We were also able to provide a basis to evaluate the different asym metrical patterns by correlating the asymmetry observed in step lengths with propulsive GRFs during hemiparetic walking. Moreover, the relationship between SLR, speed and hemiparetic severity indicates that SLR, when used along with speed as an outcome measure, can help understand compensatory strategies that some persons (who are asymmetrical a nd yet walk at faster speeds) us e to offset the lesser propulsive force ability of the paretic leg. The relationship between SLR and other spatiotemporal walking parameters further reveals how asymmetrical st ep lengths may affect hemiparetic walking. In summary, we propose that SLR is a promising tool that rehabilitation th erapists might use to further the understanding of hemiparetic walking performance. Clinically, this would enable the identification of walking impairments in hemipare tic individuals and tailor locomotor retraining specifically to address the root causes of impaired ambulation for each individual.

PAGE 64

64 Table 3-1. Correlation between SLR and walking variables

PAGE 65

65 Figure 3-1. Illustration of horizontal GRF impulses Positive values (shaded area) represent propuls ion. Negative values (unshaded area) represent braking. Paretic leg is the bold curve and non-paretic leg is the light curve. Ipp Propulsive impulse by the paretic leg is th e shaded area under the bold cu rve; Ipn -Propulsive impulse by the non-paretic leg is the shaded area under the light curve; Ibp Braking impulse by the paretic leg is the unshaded area under the bold curve; Ibn Braking impul se by the non-paretic leg is the unshaded area under the light curve.

PAGE 66

66 Figure 3-2. Comparison of GRFs between the pare tic and non-paretic legs for subjects walking with differing SLR Abbreviations: PHS = paretic heel strike, NT O = non-paretic toe off, NHS = non-paretic heel strike, and PTO = paretic toe off. Positive va lues (shaded area) represent propulsion, and the positive area under the curve is the propulsive impulse. Subject walking with SLR = 1.47 (i.e, SLR > 1.1) generates decreased paretic leg propulsion (PP). In contrast, the subject walking at SLR = 0.98 (i.e., 0.9 < SLR < 1.1) generates symme trical propulsive impulse and the subject walking with SLR = 0.68 (i.e., SLR < 0.9) genera tes relatively greater pa retic leg propulsion, PP (although low in magnitude). SLR = 1.47 Gait Speed = 0.71 m/s Severe hemiparesis SLR = 0.98 Gait Speed = 0.75 m/s Mild hemiparesis SLR = 0.68 Gait Speed = 0.52 m/s Mild hemiparesis

PAGE 67

67 Figure 3-3. Relationship between step length ratio and Propulsion Paretic Abbreviations: Propulsion Paretic = paretic leg propulsion (in %), P = Paretic leg, NP = Nonparetic leg. Solid vertical line indi cates symmetric steps (SLR = 1), vertical dashed lines indicate the SLR subdivisions at SLR = 0.9 and SLR = 1. 1. Solid horizontal line indicates symmetric propulsive force generation by the paretic leg (PP = 50%), horizontal dashed lines indicate differing levels of paretic leg propulsion (10%, 30% and 70 % PP).

PAGE 68

68 Figure 3-4. Relationship between step length asymmetry, walking speed and hemiparetic severity Abbreviations: P = Paretic leg, NP = Non-paretic leg. Solid vert ical line indicates symmetric steps (SLR = 1), vertical dashed lines indicate the SLR subdivi sions at SLR = 0.9 and SLR = 1.1. Horizontal dashed lines indicate sub-divisions of walking speeds (< 0.4 m/s household walkers, 0.4 0.8 m/s limited community walkers, > 0.8 m/s community walkers). Note that subjects with different SLR walk at all levels of walk ing speeds, yet majority of those with severe hemiparesis walk asymmetrically at SLR > 1.1.

PAGE 69

69 Figure 3-5. Change in speed, cadence and individual step lengths in subjects walking at different SLR [SLR > 1.1 (n = 21), 0.9 < SLR < 1.1 (n = 21), SLR < 0.9 (n = 4)] Abbreviations: P = Paretic, N = Non-Paretic. Subjects walking with SLR > 1.1 increase their speed by primarily increasing their cadence, with little increase in the paretic step length.

PAGE 70

70 CHAPTER 4 VARIABILITY IN SPATIOTEMPORAL ST EP CHARACTERISTICS AND ITS RELATIONSHIP TO WALKING PERFORMANCE POST-STROKE Introduction Gait variability, defined as fluctu a tions in gait characteristics from one step to the next, is reportedly low during walking [108]. However, in creased or decreased va riability is commonly reported in populations with gait abnormalities li ke elderly fallers [103, 104], older frail adults [105] and persons with neuro-degenerative diseases (e.g, Parkins ons disease) [106, 107], suggesting that gait variability strongly asso ciates with gait impairments. Increased gait variability has been related to risk for falls, impl ying that excess variability in steps might relate to balance impairments [101]. Similarly, central nervous system impairments (like cognitive functioning and motor performance) have been rela ted to increased stance time variability [110], while decreased step width variability has been related to sensory impairments and balance deficits during walking [104, 110, 111]. Gait variabil ity is also suggested to predict mobility disability [110]. Therefore, curr ent evidence suggests that gait va riability is rela ted to walking impairments and can be used as quantifiable biomechanical markers to evaluate impaired performance. In persons with post-stroke hemiparesis, ne uromuscular and sensorimotor impairments can influence the generation of a smooth coordinated walking pattern resulting in gait and balance deficits that impair walking performance. Walking performance post-stroke is commonly characterized using average gait characteristics [53]. However, measures of gait variability may provide a sensitive assessment of the motor control system performance reflective of additional aspects of impaired performance. Nonetheless, gait variability has not been evaluated as measures of walking performance in the post-stroke hemiparetic populati on. Specifically, it is unknown whether variability in paretic steps di ffers from non-paretic steps, whether the

PAGE 71

71 variability in steps might relate to severity of hemiparesis, and how gait variab ility might be associated with measures of impaired hemiparetic performance suggesting that a systematic characterization of gait variability is warranted in this population. Therefore, the purpose of this study was 1) to evaluate whether gait variability differs in persons with post-stroke hemiparesis by compari ng their variability patterns with a similarlyaged healthy population and 2) to determine if measures of gait variability may be indicative of impaired walking performance by investigating the association between gait variability and clinical assessments that evaluate im paired hemiparetic performance. Methods Participants Ninety-four participants (A ge = 61.4 11.4 years, 69 m en, 51 left-side hemiparesis, Walking speed = 0.63 0.32 m/s) with chronic he miparesis and twenty-two similarly aged healthy subjects (Age = 66.2 10.0 years, 6 men, Walking speed = 1.29 0.21 m/s) participated in this study (refer to Table 1 for participants demographics). Seventy participants with hemiparesis and the healthy cont rol subjects were part of an ongoing study at the VA-UF Human Motor Performance Laboratory, Gainesville, FL. Tw enty-four participants with hemiparesis had participated in a larger gait study at the Palo A lto Medical Center and un reported data from these participants were retrospectivel y used for analyses. All particip ants signed a written informed consent. University of Florid a Institutional Review Board and Stanford Administrative Panel on Human Subjects in Medical Rese arch approved the protocols. Participants were at least 6 months post-stroke, had unilatera l weakness, could walk 10 m in 50 seconds or less without assistance from another person and had no severe perceptual, cognitive or cardiovascular impairments contrain dicative to walking. Subjects were excluded if they had other neurological conditions in addition to stroke, had more than one cerebrovascular

PAGE 72

72 accident, or were unable to provide informed consent. Healthy participants (serving as similarlyaged controls) were excluded if they had orthope dic or neurological disorders that influenced their walking pattern. Procedures All par ticipants walked at their self-selected speeds over an instrumented walkway (GAITRite) to record spatiotemporal step charac teristics. GAITRite is valid and reliable for measuring spatiotemporal characteristics [179]. All aspects of data collec tion at the two facilities were similar. Participants began walking 2m in front of the GAITRite, continued walking 2m after the mat (overall distance ~ 10m) to get consta nt speed data, and used their assistive devices (if any) during walking. All par ticipants completed at least tw o walking trials (average = 3.4, range = 2 5 trials). Number of trials vari ed across some participants because a) many participants with hemiparesis were unable to wa lk more than 2 trials due to fatigue and low functional performance, and b) some participants walking fast completed more number of trials (4 5 trials) so that the eff ective number of steps were increas ed for comparative analyses. Hemiparetic performance was evaluated using step length asymmetry index and clinical assessments. The asymmetry in step lengths durin g hemiparetic walking was evaluated using an asymmetry index called the Paretic step ratio (PSR ), which is calculated as Paretic step length/ (Paretic + Non-paretic step lengt h) and expressed as a percentage. Asymmetry in the hemiparetic participants was characterized based on symmetr y ranges calculated from the similarly-aged healthy participants in this study and the asym metric groups were defined as follows: Longer paretic steps than non-paretic (PSR > 0.525), Shor ter paretic steps than non-paretic (PSR < 0.475) and Symmetric step lengths (0.475 PSR 0.525).

PAGE 73

73 Clinical assessments in sub-sets of the popul ation were available for analyses. Eighty-one study participants underwent Lower-extremity F ugl-Meyer (LE-FM) evaluations, which is a valid [71] and reliable [185] s cale to evaluate hemiparetic se verity. Only synergy items (22point) of LE-FM were utilized to grade hemipare tic severity similar to earlier st udies [186]. Severity of hemiparesis was graded as: severe (0 14: perform only within-synergy movements), moderate (15 18: perform movements combin ing synergy) and mild (19 22: perform movements out of synergy). Dynamic gait index (DGI) evaluated dynamic balance in thirty-two study participants. DGI rates performance of 8 wa lking-related tasks on an ordinal scale (0-3) (e.g., the ability to change speed and direc tion while walking, obstacle negotiation during walking, etc.). DGI is valid and reliable to ev aluate dynamic balance in ambulatory persons with chronic stroke [187]. Performance on DGI was graded as: DGI score 19 (poor balance performance), DGI score > 19 (good balance perfor mance) [188]. Only subsets were available for LE-FM and DGI assessments since a) only partic ipants in the Gainesville facility underwent DGI assessments and b) since participants in th e Gainesville study were part of a larger gait study, some participants were unable to complete these clinical assessments due to insufficient time. Data Analyses All collected footfalls from all trials were analyzed. This methodology to evaluate gait variability in clinically imp aired populations is similar to earlier works [104, 110, 189-191]. Average number of footfalls collected and an alyzed per subject was 25 steps (range = 12 42 steps) for the hemiparetic population and 13 st eps (range = 9 20 steps) for the control population collected from all trials. Note that, for the same average number of trials, three hemiparetic participants took many more step s than other study participants (48, 50 and 65

PAGE 74

74 steps). The results did not differ when these pa rticipants were removed from the analyses compared to when they were included in the analyses. Therefore, these participants data were included in the study. The number of steps collected and analyzed in this study is similar to that reported in earlier works [91, 92, 98, 104, 110, 111, 192] that have assessed step variability and the relationship of the spatiotem poral variability to falls risk, CNS impairments, gait speed and mobility disability [98, 104, 110, 193]. Swing time, pre-swing (double-suppo rt) time, stride time, step length and stride width were selected for analyses based on a) literature review th at suggests their importance in evaluating walking impairments post-stroke [70, 194], and b) evidence that the chosen variables have earlier revealed meaningful conclusions on walking impair ments in gait variability studies of clinically relevant populations [101, 189, 195]. Stance and step time were not calculated since the aim was also to select mutually independent variables for analyses. Refer to Table 4-1 for definitions of calculated variables. Both stance and step time s include variables that were independently calculated in the study [i.e., stance time is th e two-double support phases pl us single stance time (proportional to the contra lateral swing time) and step time is the swing time plus pre-swing time]. Variability was quantified using the standa rd deviation in spatiotemporal characteristics across steps. Statistical Analyses Kolom ogorov-Smirnov tests revealed departur es from normality for spatiotemporal characteristics in participants with hemiparesis. To allow for the use of parametric statistical processing, the data were log10 transformed to achieve normality. Dependent t-tests revealed that there was no difference in variability between right and left legs for health y participants in step length (p = .32), swing time (p = .51) and pre-sw ing time (p = .22) variability. Therefore, a oneway ANOVA tested differences in step length, swing and pre-swing time variability between

PAGE 75

75 paretic, non-paretic and healthy (l eft) leg. Results did not differ wh en the right leg of the healthy participants were used in the an alyses. For stride time and stride width, independent t-tests were conducted to test differences between population groups (hemiparetic and healthy). Note that since stride time and stride widt h were calculated using both right and left steps, there was only one factor (population) and only paretic strides we re analyzed to avoid redundant steps in the analyses. To test differences in variability across se verity and PSR groups a 3 (group) x 2 (leg) Mixed ANOVA (repeated on leg factor) was conduc ted for step length, swing time, pre-swing time variability and a one-way ANOVA for stride tim e and width variability. To test differences across DGI groups a 2 (group) x 2 (leg), Mi xed ANOVA (repeated on the leg factor) was performed for step length, swing time, pre-swing time variability and an independent t-test for stride time and stride width variability. When significant effects were detected, post-hoc pairwise comparisons were performed using Bonferroni-adj usted t-tests. All statistical analyses were conducted in SPSS (version 13.0). Results Differences in Step Variability betw een Healthy and Hemiparetic Walking Variability in step length, swing, pre-swing a nd stride tim e was increased in participants with hemiparesis compared to he althy control subj ects, while stride width variability (p = .153) was not changed in hemiparetic walking (Figures 4-1 and 4-2). However, if only the slower walkers (speed < 0.4m/s) were compared to cont rols, then width variab ility was significantly reduced (p = .038). For between-leg comparisons, swing time variabil ity was greater in paretic steps than nonparetic and there was a trend fo r paretic pre-swing (PPS) time to show greate r variability

PAGE 76

76 compared to non-paretic pre-swing (NPS) time (p = .065, Figure 4-1). There was no difference in the variability between paretic and nonparetic step lengths (Figure 4-2). Association between Step Variability, C linical Assessments and Asymmetry Index Differences in variability across the three g r oups (determined by the assessments) for each spatiotemporal characteristic are presented belo w. Additionally refer to Figure 4-3 and Figure 44 for presentation of differing patterns of spa tiotemporal variability within the severity, asymmetrical and DGI groups and Table 4-2 for the mean variability across-groups. Swing time variability Main effects (ME) of Group and Leg were significant across severity (p<.01), asymmetrical (p<.01) and DGI groups (p .02). Paretic steps showed greater variability than the non-paretic steps across all groups, with greatest betw een-leg differences in persons with severe and modera te hemiparesis, those taking L onger paretic steps and showing poor balance performance (DG1 19). Pre-swing time variability ME of both Group and Leg were significant across severity (p<.01) groups, ME of leg (p< .001) was significant across asymme trical groups and ME of group was significant across DGI. PPS show ed greater variability than N PS in the severe and moderate groups and across asymmetrical groups. Both PPS and NPS showed greater variability in persons showing poor balance performance compared to those showing good balance performance. Stride time variability differed across severity groups (p < .0001). Severe and moderate groups showed greater stride tim e variability than the mild group (p < .003), but did not differ from each other (p > .05, Table 4-2). Stride tim e variability differed across asymmetrical groups (p = .023) but post-hoc tests showed that asymme trical groups showed only a trend (of greater variability) to differ from the symmetrical group (p .109). Stride time variability (p = .007) was greater in persons showing poor balance performance (DGI 19), (Table 4-2, Figure 4-3).

PAGE 77

77 Step length variability showed a trend to differ acro ss severity groups (p = .069) and asymmetrical groups (p = .094). However, ME of group and leg were significant for step length variability (group: p = .026, le g: p = .03) across DGI groups (p .03), with the non-paretic leg showing greater variabilit y than the paretic leg. Stride width variability showed a trend to differ across severity groups (p = .045) but did not differ across the asymmetri cal or DGI groups (p > .95). Discussion Differences in Step Variability between Healthy and Hemiparet ic Participants We found that, similar to other populations with gait deficits [111, 190, 196], variability in all spatiotemporal characteristics (except stride width) increased in pe rsons with post-stroke hemiparesis compared to healthy controls (Figur e 4-1, 4-2). While increased variability has been related to gait deficits in impaired populations [106, 111, 190, 196], our study is the first to report between-leg differences in step variabil ity. We found between-leg differences in swing and pre-swing time variability s uggesting a direct a ssociation between underlying paretic leg impairments and step variability. Paretic swing time variability was greater than the non-paretic leg and this difference in variability between -legs was greatest for persons showing most impaired performance (severe and moderate hemipa resis, asymmetrical steps and those at risk for falling as predicted by lower DGI scores) (Figure 4-3, 4-4). Increased step variability specifically in the paretic leg might relate to the neuromuscular impairme nts after a hemiparetic stroke, such as altered neural i nputs to the paretic spinal half-cen ters, altered effects of afferent feedback to the paretic leg and impaired inte r-limb coordination during walking. Furthermore, PPS variability showed a trend to be greater than NPS. Prolonged tim e in PPS has been related to impaired progression during hemiparetic walking [70]. The increased variability in PPS relative to NPS suggests that the neurom otor deficits in this phase may limit hemiparetic walking

PAGE 78

78 performance. Step length va riability did not differ between -legs but was greater during hemiparetic walking compared to h ealthy. It is likely that spatia l variables such as step length (that determine the base of suppor t during gait) are inhe rently more tightly coordinated betweenlegs than temporal variables su ch that step-to-step variation in one leg is counter-balanced by variation in the other leg to ma intain steady-state walking. Furthe rmore, stride time variability was also increased during hemiparetic walking compared to healthy. In creased stride time variability is reported to be st rongly related to falls risk [ 101, 103], suggesting that increased variability post-stroke might re late to poor dynamic balance. Relationship between Hemiparetic Step Variab ility and Impaired P erformance Post-Stroke To test the use of gait variability measures as markers of impaired performance, we wanted to investigate the relationship between step va riability and hemiparetic performance. This relationship also provided insi ghts on potential mechanisms underlying the variability patterns. For example, the ability to produce independent voluntary movements of the paretic leg is related to motor recovery of the paretic leg and is graded using the LE FM (higher score greater recovery). The inverse relation between hemiparetic severity and step variability suggests that variability might decrease as motor recove ry progresses. Similarl y, greater step length asymmetry (both Longer paretic and Shorter pare tic groups) has been related to motor control impairments [194]. In support of this hypothesis, our results revealed th at both asymmetrical groups presented with greater swing time variabi lity compared to the symmetrical group but did not differ from each other. Moreover, the associ ation between step variability and hemiparetic performance is revealed in the relation between DGI scores and variab ility (Figure 4-3, 4-4). Since DGI has been used to evaluate dynamic ba lance [187] (lower score lower balance), the inverse relation between DGI scores and step variability suggests that persons showing greater step variability might have poor dynamic balance. Specifically, DGI scores less than equal to 19

PAGE 79

79 are reported to identify persons at risk for falling [188] and participants wi th hemiparesis in our study with scores less than equal to 19 exhibited greater st ep variability. While the overall increased step variability was related to impaired performance (lower LE FM score, greater asymmetry and lower DGI sc ore), the pattern across the sub-groups was not consistent for all spatiotempor al parameters (e.g. between-leg differences in pre-swing time variability was observed across severity groups but not across DGI groups ). Since the stroke population is immensely heterogeneous, we expected the spatiotemporal step variability patterns would differ across sub-groups of participants sugge sting that specific sp atiotemporal measures are more strongly associated with particular as pects of hemiparetic performance. For instance, between-leg differences in swing time variab ility were significant ac ross all sub-groups of participants (severity, asymmetr y and DGI groups) suggesting that between-leg differences in swing time variability were most strongly related to impaired hemiparetic performance (as measured by severity, asymmetry and DGI). St ride time variability differed across all subgroups. In comparison, for step length variability there were no differences between-legs when considering the hemiparetic populati on as a group. However, in pers ons at risk for falling, paretic variability was increased relative to non-pare tic; suggesting that step length differences betweenlegs might be unmasked in the most impaired pers ons. Nonetheless, the relatively small sample size of the DGI subgroups could have pot entially influenced these results. While step variability in different spatiotem poral parameters varied across sub-groups of participants in combination, vari ability in the spatiotemporal parameters seemed to robustly predict impaired hemiparetic performance. For instance, a participant having markedly increased PPS variability (black-bold arrow in Figure 4-3), increased pareti c step length and reduced width variability (black-bold arrow in Figure 4-4) shows impaired he miparetic walking performance.

PAGE 80

80 The inferences from other measures, however, were inconsistent (poor balance performance (DGI = 8), moderate hemiparetic severity, symm etric steps). Similarly, another participant had good balance performance (DGI = 22) but walked asymmetrically with much longer paretic steps, again indicating the contra sting inferences on performance as predicted by these measures. This person had markedly increased stride time variability and reduced width variability (red arrow in Figure 4-4). Overall, these examples exhi bit a marked increase of variability in one or other spatiotemporal characteristic and reduced variability in stride widths, suggesting that although poor hemiparetic performance was not consistently evident across all clinical assessments, gait variability robustly identified impaired walking performance. Unlike other spatiotemporal characteristics, stride width variability was reduced in the slower walkers when compared to controls. Stride width is calculated in the frontal plane unlike other spatiotemporal characteristi cs that are sagittal plane me asures, suggesting an inherent difference in control of this parameter. Furthe rmore, in population groups susceptible to falls (such as elderly fallers, persons with Parkin sons disease and commun ity dwelling elderly), width variability is reported to be reduced and th is reduction in variability is shown to predict falls [104, 107, 189]. In our study, we also observed that participants showing markedly reduced width variability walked with wide strides. A wider step provides a wider base of support for side-to-side motion of the center of mass and mi ght be accompanied by a reduction in variability of medio-lateral foot placement to ensure that st eps are consistently wide Therefore, it is likely that observed reduction in width variability is compensatory to maintain stability. Decreased width variability in comparison to increased variability in other spatiotemporal characteristics implies that altered variability might be speci fic to step characteristics and should not be generalized.

PAGE 81

81 Study Limitations There were som e limitations in our study. Da ta was collected from a limited number of steps that could have influenced the accuracy of our results [95]. However, a major strength of our methodology was the ability to measure spa tial variables as well. Methodologies that capture hundreds of steps are based on reco rding temporal charac teristics only [104]. Furthermore, despite the fewer number of steps collected in our study, observed patterns of gait variability were consistent with those observed in other impaired populations [101, 106, 111]. Further, use of the GAITRite based protocol is cl inically relevant and th erefore, our study results have the potential to rapidly translate to the c linical settings. We also evaluated gait variability using coefficient-of-variation (CV = standard deviation/mean) in step characteristics. Using CV to evaluate variability may result in ques tionable conclusions of increased variability, specifically when the mean value is of low magnitude. It is also likely th at the differences in stride variability could be due to differences in st rategies (i.e., length-frequency combinations) employed to achieve a certain speed [197]. Nonethel ess, several studies have shown that stride variability, could be independent of st ride length and frequency [91, 189]. Furthermore, it is likely that the trial-to-tri al variability in speed resulted in observed changes in the variability. However, the speed variability did not differ (p = 0.268) between hemiparetic and healthy participan ts, suggesting that the trial-to-trial speed variation did not contribute to the observed pattern s of gait variability. Slower walking speeds post-stroke are likely to be associated with greater alterations in step variability. Yet, observed patterns of gait variability cannot be solely attr ibuted to effects of speed beca use if healthy persons walk at slower speeds similar to persons with gait defici ts, gait variability is likely to remain relatively low during healthy gait even at the slower speed s [111]. In addition, while persons walking with assistive devices showed overall greater step variability than th ose not using assistive devices,

PAGE 82

82 the inverse relationship between variability a nd walking performance was apparent when we evaluated the data for those using assistive devices separately from others who did not. Conclusions In conclusion, results of this study suggest th at step variability is altered post-stroke com pared to healthy controls and relates to hemiparetic walking performance. Specifically, between-leg differences in swing time and pre-swing variability, in creased step length and stride time variability and reduced wi dth variability can be indica tive of underlying sensorimotor impairments post-stroke; suggesting these as quantifiable measures of impaired hemiparetic performance. Future studies s hould investigate the underlying cause s of altered variability and the effect of therapeutic interventions on gait va riability to further validate its use to assess hemiparetic performance. Table 4-1. Definitions of study variables STEP LENGTH (cm): measured along the line of progression, from the heel center of the current footprint to the heel center of the previous footprint on the opposite foot. PRE-SWING TIME (sec): Pre-swing (or double suppor t) time occurs from opposite footfall first contact to support footfall last contact. SWING TIME (sec): time elapsed between the Last Contact of the current footfall to the First Contact of the next foot fall of the same foot. STRIDE TIME (sec): time elapsed between the firs t contacts of two consecutive footfalls of the same foot. STRIDE WIDTH (cm): vertical distance from midline midpoint of one footprint to the line formed by midline midpoints of two footprints of the opposite foot.

PAGE 83

83 Table 4-2. Step variability (expressed as standard deviation) within th e hemiparetic population sub-divided based on their performance measures

PAGE 84

84 Figure 4-1. Differences in temporal variability between healthy (n = 22) and participants with hemiparesis (n = 94) at Self -selected (SS) walking speeds The box plots indicate the range in the data. The central horizon tal line is the median of the sample. The length of the box indicates the in ter-quartile range with the upper and lower boundaries of the box indicating the upper and lower quartile, resp ectively. Circles represent sample values that statistically indicate outlier or extreme values (by SPSS software). In impaired populations, these outlier values are true indicators of behavi or and represent those persons showing excessive variability. indica tes statistically signifi cant differences from healthy leg at p < .0001, # indicate s statistically significant differe nce from non-paretic leg at p < .0001. Note that the statistical significance is based on the mean of the logtransformed values of the respective temporal characteristics. Variability in all temporal characteristics was increased during hemiparetic walking. Abbreviations: P Pa retic leg, N Non-paretic leg, HC Healthy control leg, H Hemiparetic walking (v alue includes steps from both legs).

PAGE 85

85 Figure 4-2. Differences in spatia l variability between healthy (n = 22) and participants with hemiparesis (n = 94) at Self -selected (SS) walking speeds The box plots indicate the range in the data similar to Figure1 indicates statistically significant differences from healt hy leg at p < .0001 and the statis tical significance is based on the mean of the log transformed values of the re spective temporal characteristics. Variability in step length characteristics was increased during hemiparetic walking and that in stride width showed a trend to decrease during hemiparetic walking. Abbreviations: P Paretic leg, N Nonparetic leg, HC Healthy control leg, H Hemi paretic walking (value includes steps from both legs).

PAGE 86

86 Figure 4-3. Differences in tempor al variability in hemipareti c participants based on their performance on clinical assessments The box plots indicate the range in the data similar to Figures 1. Blue represents paretic leg and Green represents non-paretic leg for swing time a nd pre-swing time variabili ty. In general, poor performance is indicated by more severe hemipa resis (lower LE-FM scores), asymmetrical gait (longer or shorter paretic steps) and poorer balance performance (lower DGI scores)]. Note the between-leg differences in swi ng and pre-swing time in persons with moderate and severe hemiparesis, those walking asym metrically and in persons showing poor balance performance. Note that while stride time variability diffe rences were observed in sub-groups of the hemiparetic population, these have not been represented in the Figure.

PAGE 87

87 Figure 4-4. Differences in spat ial variability in hemiparetic participants based on their performance on clinical assessments The box plots indicate the range in the data similar to Figures 1. Blue represents paretic leg and Green represents non-paretic leg fo r step length variability. Note that stride width variability does not show a consistent trend to differ acro ss the different sub-groups of the hemiparetic population.

PAGE 88

88 CHAPTER 5 FOOT PLACEMENT IN A BODY REFERE NC E FRAME DURING WALKING AND ITS RELATIONSHIP TO HEMIPARETI C WALKING PERFORMANCE Introduction Foot placem ent during walking is commonly quantified using parameters that are determined relative to the other foot during a step (e.g., step lengt h and step width). Nonetheless, foot placement closely relates to body m ovements [117, 118]. For instance, forward body progression during walking requires controlling the movement of the bodys center-of-mass relative to where the foot is pl aced. Similarly, dynamic stability during walking is established by foot placement in a body reference frame (in re lation to body movement). Specifically, by foot placement in a body reference frame, we imply calcula tion of where the foot is placed relative to the body during walking (and not relative to the ot her foot). For instance, step length in a body reference frame can be calculated as the anteri or distance between the leading foot center-ofmass and the center-of-mass of the pelvis at heel st rike. Patterns of foot placement relative to the body are rarely investigated during gait. In some earlier studies, foot placement relative to body was investigated during healthy gait and rela ted to motor control during gait [116-119, 134]. However, foot placement relati ve to body has not been investig ated in neurologically impaired populations and specifically in an asymmetrical population such as stroke. The observations of asymmetric foot and trunk kinematics in isol ation [198, 199] suggests that foot placement relative to body likely are asymmetric post-stroke but it is unclear whether persons with specific motor control deficits would have particular patt erns of where they place their foot relative to body. Post-stroke, quantifying where the foot is pl aced relative to body could provide a deeper understanding of the mechanisms of hemiparetic walking than is possible when foot kinematics alone are known (as when it is de fined relative to other foot). Fo r example, in persons who take

PAGE 89

89 asymmetrical step lengths (relative ly longer or shorter paretic step lengths), it is unclear whether their foot placements relative to pe lvis (or trunk) would also be asym metrical. It is possible that, in those persons who take longer paretic steps th an non-paretic, while the paretic step is longer relative to the other foot; relative to pelvis both feet are placed symmetrically. Furthermore, in persons taking asymmetrical longer or shorter paretic steps than non-paretic, paretic and nonparetic stride lengths are likely to be the same. This suggests that investigation of foot placement relative to pelvis can reveal differential pattern s of asymmetrical foot placement anterior or posterior to the pelvis and help understand the sp ecific motor control in such asymmetrical subgroups. Similarly, it is unclear whet her there is any asymmetry in la teral foot placements relative to pelvis and whether it relates to step width post-stroke. Therefore, in this study patterns of foot placement relative to body were compared to step length asymmetry and step width to investigate the relation between stepping in a body reference frame to stepping relative to the other foot. Furthermore, we expected that investigation of foot placement rela tive to body will provide insights into forward progre ssion, weight support and dynamic stability during hemiparetic walking. Accurate foot placement in relation to the body during walk ing establishes a stable base for the body to progress forward [118, 132]; impl ying that foot placement during walking is closely related to forward progression. Furtherm ore, lateral balance of the body depends on the mediolateral foot placement [134] suggesting that identification of persons with hemiparesis with specific patterns of mediolater al foot placement can help de termine their dynamic stability. Mediolateral foot placement rela tive to the body can also infl uence the weight shifted and supported on the legs since how far one places th eir foot relative to th e body at ground contact will influence the extent of body displacement. Th erefore, we also investigated the relation

PAGE 90

90 between mediolateral foot placement relative to body and weight supported on the leg to identify persons with disturbances in weight shifting. Therefore, in this study, in addition to quantifying foot placement relative to body during hemipare tic walking, the relationship between foot placement relative to body and walking performance was explored. Walking performance was quantified using step length asymmetry patte rns, paretic propulsi on, weight support and a dynamic stability margin. In summary, the purpose of this study was 1) to evaluate where the foot is placed relative to the body during walking in a post-stroke population and, 2) to understand how foot placement in the body reference frame relates to walking pe rformance. Foot placement relative to body was calculated in the anterior-posterior and medial-l ateral directions during hemiparetic walking and compared to patterns of foot placement in a similarly-aged healthy population (serving as controls) walking at matched slow speeds. Inclusi on of control subjects was deemed necessary to compare the foot placement patterns in the he miparetic gait to that of healthy gait. We hypothesized that the measures of stepping performance (step lengths and step widths), forward progression, weight support and dynamic stability would relate to the asymmetry in foot placement relative to body such that investigat ion of foot placement in a body reference frame will provide insights into essential requireme nts of locomotion and help better evaluate asymmetric gait post-stroke. Methods Participants Data were collected from thirty-nine participants with chronic hem iparesis (Age = 60.21 12.32 years, 20 men, 19 left-side hemi paresis) and twenty age-matche d healthy participants (Age = 66.15 10.03 years, 4 men) at the VA-UF Huma n motor performance laboratory, VA Medical center at Gainesville Florida. Inclusion criteria for the participants with hemiparesis were:

PAGE 91

91 hemiparesis secondary to a single onset unilateral stroke ; ability to ambulate independently with or without an assistive device over 10 m on a level surface; ability to walk on a regular basis at least at home; absence of significant lower extremity joint pain and major sensory deficits; absence of significant lower limb contractures a nd no significant cardiovasc ular or respiratory symptoms contraindicative to walking. Participants from the study were excluded if they had any orthopedic or neurologic conditions in addition to stroke, had signifi cant musculoskeletal problems other than stroke that limit hip and knee extension or ankle planta r flexion to neutral, or were unable to provide informed consent. All participants in the study signed a written informed consent and Institutional Review Board of University of Florida approved the protocol. Procedures Retro-reflective m arkers were attached to the pa rticipant to collect bilateral 3D kinematics using a 12 camera VICON motion analyses system. Markers were attached to the head, trunk, upper extremity, lower extremity and the feet. Clus ters of reflective mark ers attached to rigid bodies were also located on the pe lvis, bilateral thighs, shanks and feet (Figure 5-1). A fixed laboratory coordinate reference fr ame was created within the VIC ON system that was placed at the left corner of the laboratory. At the beginning of the test se ssion, controls and participants with hemiparesis walked for 2-3 trials across a 12 ft long instrumented mat (GaitRite) at their self-selected walking speeds to collect over ground spatiotemporal parameters of steps and estimate their overground walking speeds. Gaitrite is a valid instrument to m easure spatiotemporal parameters during walking [179]. Subsequently, controls and participants with hemiparesis walked on an instrumented splitbelt treadmill (TECMACHINE) for three trials at their self-selected treadmill walking speed. In case of participants with hemiparesis, the treadmill self-selected speeds were 10 30% slower

PAGE 92

92 than the over ground self-selecte d speeds. Participants with hemiparesis completed three 30second walking trials without use of an assistive device or ankle-foot orthosis. A safety harness mounted to the laboratory ceiling was worn across the shoulders and chest to protect the participants in the even t that they loose balance. Note, th at no bodyweight was offloaded by the harness. Additionally, a physical therapist closely guarded the participants as they walked over the treadmill (although no manual support was provided by the therap ist). For healthy participants, treadmill speeds closely appr oximated their over ground speeds. Healthy participants, in addition, walked at fixed slow speeds on the treadmill for a single trial at 0.3 m/s, 0.6 m/s, and 0.9 m/s to provide control data at speeds matched to the slower speeds of the hemiparetic participants. To optimize capture of steady state data on the treadmill, each subject walked for 10 s prior to each of the 30 s of data collection. Three-dimensional GRFs were measured from each half of the treadmill along with the kinematic data collection during the walking trials. Data Analyses Kinema tic data: Raw kinematic data was low-pass filter ed using a fourth-order zero-lag Butterworth filter with a 10 Hz cutoff frequency. Th e joint center and anatomical trajectories was fitted to an eight-segment musculoskeletal model generated using SIMM (MusculoGraphics, Inc.) consisting of a trunk (incl uding the mass of the torso, head and arms), pelvis and legs for each subject (Figure 5-1 presents the SIMM model fr om an individual participants walking trial). Each lower extremity consisted of a thigh, shank and foot. The anthropometrics and inertial properties were based on that of de Leva [200]. Segmental center-of-mass (COM) calculations were used to calculate the whole body COM. In this study, specifically pelvis COM was used to reference the body.

PAGE 93

93 Kinetic data: Three-dimensional GRFs were sampled at 2000 Hz. Ground reaction force data was low-pass filtered using a fourth-order zero-lag Butterworth filter with a 20 Hz cutoff frequency. The SIMM Motion Module (MusculoGraphi cs, Inc.) was used to perform a standard inverse dynamics analysis to determine the inter-segmental joint moments. Kinetic data (GRFs and joint moments) was normalized by subject b ody weight. Kinetic data was time normalized to 100% of the paretic leg gait cy cle (paretic heel strike to paretic heel strike). Calculation of study variables: All variables were calculated by averaging across all complete gait cycles of each of the three trials. The number of steps that ar e used to calculate the averages varied across subjects sinc e they walked at different speeds. Foot Placement and foot position variables: Anterior-Posterior (A P) and medial-lateral (ML) foot placement and position variables relative to pelvis were calculated for individual legs. The body was referenced at the pelvis COM (Figur e 5-2). Calculation of initial foot placement (calculated at ground contact in the 1st doubl e support phase) and terminal foot position (calculated as toe-off in the 2nd double support phas e) in AP and ML direction is presented in Table 5-1. The term foot position was used to di stinguish these variable s from foot placement variables since the foot position variables de scribe how the body movement progressed in a specific positioning of the foot relative to the body. Stepping relative to the other foot: Step length and step widths were calcul ated for individual legs at the same instant as the variables calculated in the body reference frame (Table 5-1). Stepping asymmetry, forward progression, weight support and Dynamic stability: Step length asymmetry was qua ntified using a Paretic step ratio [194], (Table5-1). Asymmetry in the hemipa retic participants was characterized based on symmetry ranges calculated from similarly-aged h ealthy participants walking on the treadmill, as follows: Longer paretic steps than non-paretic ( PSR > 55), Shorter pa retic steps than non-

PAGE 94

94 paretic (PSR < 45) and Sym metric step lengths (45 PSR 55). Forward progression was quantified using paretic propulsion [76], (Table 5-1). Weight support was quantified by the average vertical force supporte d on individual legs during the stance phases (Table 5-1). Dynamic stability was evaluated by a Dynamic Stab ility Margin (DSM) similar to earlier studies [201, 202], (Table 5-1). Specifically, we used th e DSM that we calculated at the instance at which the xCOM reached its maximum value in 1st double-support (DSMmax). Statistical Analyses For contro l subjects, right-left foot placements and positions were similar at all speeds (i.e., no between-leg asymmetry), in both AP and ML direction relative to pelvis (p < .001). Therefore, only control (left) leg was used in the comparisons with par ticipants post-stroke. To compare foot placement and position relative to the body between controls and participants with hemiparesis, a 3 (leg: paretic, non-paretic, control) x 2 (phase: foot-strike, foot-off) Mixed ANOVA was conducted. Median foot placements of control particip ants at varying speeds were compared to participants with hemiparesis walki ng at similar range of speeds in the statistical analyses. Controls participants walked at 3 varying slow speeds: 0.3 m/s, 0.6 m/s and 0.9 m/s. Therefore, the comparisons of hemiparetic particip ants were made for those persons walking less than equal to these speed ranges. Note that each speed group consisted of different hemiparetic participants walking at their self -selected speeds. Since median foot placements were used in the analyses, number of controls was matched to that of the hemipareti c in each speed group. Pearson correlations were conducted to evaluate the relationships betw een foot placements, positions and walking performance measures. Quadratic relations were additionally explored for each of the relationships but it did not improve the explanatory power significantly in any relationship, therefore linear relationships have been presented.

PAGE 95

95 Results Quantifying Foot Placement Rela tive to the Pelvis For control subjects, right-left foot placements and positions were similar at all speeds (i.e., no between-leg asymmetry), in both AP and ML direction relative to pelvis (p < .001). Therefore, the left leg was used as the contro l leg in the comparisons with participants poststroke. AP direction: In control participants, foot placement was anterior at ground contact (GC) and foot position posterior at toeoff (TO) relative to pelvis, with the anterior placement showing greater excursion than posterior at all the varying speeds (40 80 mm, p < .001), (Figure 5-3a). The greater anterior excursion of the foot at GC than posterior at TO relative to pelvis is operationally termed as between-phase asymmetry in this study to differen tiate from between-leg asymmetry. In participants with hemiparesis, the pattern of paretic and non-paretic foot placement varied with their walking speeds. Foot placement in slow walkers ( 0.3 m/s, n = 22) and cont rols walking at matchedspeeds: Both between-leg and between-phase asym metry was observed in those hemiparetic participants walking slowly. Median foot placemen ts were anterior at GC and posterior at TO, with the paretic foot be ing more anterior and less posterior than non-paretic (p=.003). There was increased inter-subject variability in posterior pare tic foot position at TO su ch that at least half the participants in this group never positioned their foot posterior to the pe lvis (Figure 5-3a). The control foot showed grea ter excursion than both th e paretic and non-paretic feet even at matched slow speed (p<.001). However, the difference in anterior foot placement between control and paretic feet was small (~30 mm). Foot placement in Moderate (> 0.3m/s 0.6 m/s, n = 12) and Fast walkers (> 0.6 m/s 0.9m/s, n = 5) and controls walking at matched-speeds: For participants walking at moderate

PAGE 96

96 (0.3 0.6 m/s) and fast (0.6 0.9 m/s) speeds th ere was no between-leg asymmetry but betweenphase asymmetry was apparent (GC TO relative to pelvis = 6 10 cm), (p<.01), Figure 5-3a. Further, for the fast walkers foot placement excurs ions were similar to that of Controls (p<.001), excepting paretic anterior foot placement that was reduced. ML direction: There was no between-phase asymmetry in foot placements in controls and participants with hemiparesis (i .e., same ML distance at GC and TO). Therefore, lateral foot placement at GC is presented. In participants with hemiparesis walking slow and at moderate speeds, the paretic foot was placed lateral to pe lvis compared to both non-paretic (difference range = 30 70 mm) and speed-matched control (d ifference range = 49 74 mm) foot placement (p < .001), (Figure 5-3b). Additionally, Paretic foot was lateral most compared to non-paretic in the slow walkers. In the fast walkers (speed 0.6 0.9 m/s), paretic foot was significantly lateral to the body only relative to speed-matched cont rol foot placement and not non-paretic foot placement (p< .01), (Figure 5-3b). Relationship between Anterior-Posterior Foot Placements Relative to Pelvis, Step Length Asymmetry and Paretic Propulsion Betw een-leg asymmetry (anterior foot placem ent relative to pelvis) and step length asymmetry: Anterior foot placement asymmetry was a ssociated with step length asymmetry (r = .756, p< .001), suggesting that person s taking asymmetrical step le ngths also place their feet asymmetrically relative to pelvis (Figure 54). Nonetheless, asymme try ranges in the two reference frames differed. Note that persons seve rely asymmetric in the global reference frame (PSR > 90%) showed similar patterns in both th e reference frames, however persons showing mild to moderate step length asymmetry (PSR = 60 80%) placed their paretic and non-paretic feet more symmetrically with respect to the pe lvis (asymmetry range in body reference frame = 55 60%), (Figure 5-4).

PAGE 97

97 Anterior-posterior foot placement relative to pelvis and step length asymmetry: Paretic foot placement at TO a nd non-paretic foot placement at GC strongly correlated with step length asymmetry (PSR) even after controlling fo r walking speed (Figure 5-5). Note in Figure 55, participants taking relatively long paretic st eps (PSR > 70%) positione d their paretic foot anterior (opposite to the expected pattern) at TO Similarly, participants taking relatively shorter paretic steps (PSR 40%) positioned their pareti c foot much less posteriorly at TO relative to the symmetric group. Between-leg asymmetry and paretic propulsion: Asymmetrical anterior foot placements relative to pelvis and step length asymmetry were each negatively associated to paretic propulsion (r = -.584 and r = -.520, resp ectively), suggesting that both between-leg anterior foot placement asymmetry in body reference frame and step length asymmetry related to percent propulsion genera ted by the paretic leg. Relationship between Medial-Lateral Foot Pla cements R elative to Pelvis, Step Widths, Paretic Weight Support and Dynamic Stability Margin Lateral foot placement asymme try relative to pelvis, step widths and percent weight supported on the paretic leg: There was no difference in paretic and non-paretic step widths during hemiparetic walking (p = .732) and no re lation between step width and either percent weight borne on the paretic leg (r = .244, p = .135) or lateral foot placements (r = .235, p = .150). However, lateral foot placement was asymmetric and was negatively associated to the percent weight supported on the pa retic leg (Figure 5-6). Lateral foot placement asymmetry relativ e to pelvis, step widths and dynamic stability margins: Pearson correlations control ling for walking speed revealed that Lateral foot placement asymmetry was positively associated to paretic DSMmax (r = .548, p < .001); suggesting that the wider paretic foot placemen t relative to pelvis than non-paretic foot

PAGE 98

98 placement is related to the wider paretic stabil ity margin. Step width was positively associated with both paretic and non-paretic DSMmax (r = .520, p=.001 and r=.360, p= .024; respectively) suggesting that overall a wider step was related to greater stability margin on both paretic and non-paretic legs. Discussion The results of this study show that foot pl acem ent in a body reference frame is asymmetric in AP and ML directions during hemiparetic walk ing and this asymmetry related to hemiparetic walking performance. Anterior-Posterior Foot Placement Relative to Pelvis and its Relat ionship to Step Length Asymmetry and Forward Progression Between-phase asymmetry: Overall, relative to pelvis the foot was placed more anterior at GC and less posterior at TO in both controls and participants with hemiparesis at all speeds. Further, participants post-stroke showed greater between-phase asymmetry in the paretic leg than non-paretic legs and also greater asymmetry than controls walking at matched slow speeds. The excursions of the foot were also greater in AP direction for controls ev en at the matched slow speeds indicating that slower walking speeds alone cannot explain the AP asymmetry in the hemipaertic participants. Further, note that pa retic posterior foot position at TO specifically showed increased inter-subject variability (See Figure 5-3a, speeds 0.3 m/s) suggests that there were persons who never positioned their paretic foot posterior to the pelvis and others who positioned it posterior and yet these two groups were walking at similarly slow walking speeds. Further, we correlated the posterior foot position at TO to step length asymmetry because we hypothesized that the inter-subject variabi lity in posterior foot position would be well explained by relating the AP foot placements to step length asymmetry and could further help explain the motor control impairments in the asymmetrical groups. Redu ced posterior paretic

PAGE 99

99 foot position at TO and anterior non-paretic foot placement at GC relative to pelvis strongly correlated with step length asym metry. Specifically, in persons taki ng Longer pareti c steps than non-paretic (PSR > 55%), the paretic posterior f oot position was either reduced or anterior relative to the pelvis suggesting that paretic leg orientation at pre-swing phase was opposite than that expected (posterior positioning) in this ph ase. Therefore, while these persons with Longer paretic steps had good stepping ability evidenced by the greater paretic anterior foot placement relative to pelvis than non-paretic (see Figure 5-4), an inability to achieve a more posterior paretic foot position at TO sugge sts impaired paretic leg extens ion in the Longer paretic group. A flexed leg orientation at TO versus extended in the paretic pre-swing phase can reduce the mechanical advantage of an extended extremity to propel the trunk forward. This observation is supported by the evidence that the Longer pa retic group shows reduced paretic propulsion [194]. In support of our explanation, we would expe ct that in the Shor ter paretic group the posterior paretic foot position would be relatively greater compar ed to the Longer paretic group since these persons show good paretic propulsion. Wh ile all participants in the Shorter paretic group positioned their paretic foot posterior relati ve to pelvis (Figure 5-5), in the severely asymmetric (PSR < 40%), the poste rior foot position relative to pelvis was much reduced similar to some persons in the Longer paretic group. Ther efore, we additionally i nvestigated their foot position relative to the trunk COM to evaluate if compen satory trunk lean might be the mechanism utilized to propel th e body forward. Relative to the trunk, paretic foot position was much posterior at TO (showing similar excursion as anterior non-paretic foot placement at GC). Since the foot placement relative to trunk depends not only on wher e the foot is placed but where the trunk is positioned, it is possible that at least some of these persons in the Shorter paretic

PAGE 100

100 group generate good body forward pr ogression during the paretic pr e-swing phase by flexing the trunk forward and thereby creati ng a mechanically advantageous position for the propulsive ground reaction forces generated from the paretic leg to propel the body forward. Therefore, by investigating the foot placement relative to the trunk (in additi on to pelvis), compensatory strategies could be diagnosed. Between-leg asymmetry in anterior foot placements: We also correlated anterior foot placement asymmetry to step length asymmetry (Fi gure 5-4) to understand the relation between foot placement in a body reference frame to steppi ng relative to the other foot. Overall, stepping asymmetry in the two reference frames were correlated (for example, persons taking Longer paretic steps relative to non-paretic were also placing their paretic f oot more anterior relative to pelvis). However, the symmetry range in the body reference frame was narrower than step length symmetry range and some persons who were asymme tric taking Longer paretic step lengths than non-paretic (PSR = 55 -65%) were symmetric in the body reference frame. Interestingly, others who were taking symmetrical step lengths were ac tually asymmetric relative to pelvis taking shorter paretic steps than non-paretic The ability to place the foot further anterior to the pelvis suggests good stepping ability and the observation that the borderli ne symmetric persons actually took shorter paretic steps relative to pelvis s uggests their impaired paretic stepping ability. Therefore, we suggest that since some persons [mildly asymmetric (longer paretic) and symmetric] step lengths changed their asymme try in a translating body reference frame, additional investigation of foot placement pattern re lative to pelvis might be necessary to classify them as symmetric or asymmetric. In summary, by relating the foot placement and position relative to the pelvis to step length asymmetry we are able to propose some unde rlying motor control mechanisms in the

PAGE 101

101 asymmetrical groups. Longer paretic group sh owed poor forward body progression likely due to altered initial conditio ns of the leg in their pre-swing phase, whereas the Shorter paretic group showed poor stepping ability due to the inability to place the pa retic foot further anterior to the pelvis. Further, the good forward progression at least in some participants in the Shorter paretic group might be compensatory from lean ing the trunk forward in the pre-swing phase of their paretic gait cycle. Medial-Lateral Foot Placement Relative to Pelv is and its Relationship to Weight Supported on Paretic Leg and Dynamic Stability Margin There was no difference in ML foot placem ent at GC and TO (i.e. no between-phase asymmetry). However, between-legs, the pareti c foot was placed wider relative to pelvis compared to non-paretic and speed-matched control in participants with hemiparesis walking at slow and moderate speeds. Furthe r, this lateral foot placement asymmetry between-leg decreased with increasing walking speed dur ing hemiparetic walking (Figure 5-3b). Furthermore, we found that the lateral foot placement asymmetry was strongly correlated with both weight support and paretic dynamic stability margin. We quantified the percent weight supported on paretic leg as the percentage of Vertical Ground reaction force on the paretic leg during stance compared to the both legs. Overall paretic leg supported lesser we ight compared to non-paretic evidenced by the lower percentages than 50 (Figure 5-6). This we ight-bearing asymmetry is consistently reported in the post-stroke population [19, 154]. However, th e relationship between lateral foot placement and weight supported on the legs has not yet been reported in this population. While we expected that wei ght supported on the leg would be related to lateral foot placement, our results specifically show that the asymmetry in lateral foot placement relative to pelvis (i.e., wider paretic steps relative to pelv is than non-paretic) relate d to the weight supported on the paretic leg during stance. On the other han d, step widths were unr elated to the paretic

PAGE 102

102 weight support suggesting that investigation of late ral foot placement as ymmetry relative to pelvis specifically revealed the impaired paretic leg weight support in persons taking wider paretic steps relative to body. Therefore, we sugg est that close observation of the lateral paretic foot placement relative to the body in comparis on to lateral non-paretic foot placement can provide useful insights to the clinicians rega rding the amount of weight supported on the paretic leg. Moreover, we found that the lateral foot pl acement asymmetry specifi cally related to the dynamic stability margin on the paretic side. We calculated the dynamic stability margin specifically for each foot (at init ial contact) as the ML distance between xCOM and foot COM at the instance when xCOM reached its maximum value in 1st double-support (Table 5-1). Foot placements at heel-strike have earlier shown to be a linear function of COM displacement and velocity and shown to be the most importa nt factor defining stable gaits [116, 117, 134] suggesting the importance of foot placement to dyna mic stability. Specifically, in this study we chose to use DSMmax since it physiologically rela tes to the point of maximum instability. We also calculated DSM at other in stances: first instance of groundcontact (DSM-GC) and at every 20% of 1st double-support. Evaluation of DSM at every 20% of the gait cycle revealed that there was no significant difference between DSM values as the 1st double-support phase progressed suggesting that the DSM doesnt change substa ntially across the double-support phase. Further, DSM-GC and DSMmax revealed the same pa ttern relative to foot placement, although correlations were stronger for DSMmax and foot pl acement. Note that, we did not use the entire area enclosed between foot placements (i.e., base of support) to define th e DSM since we wanted to investigate how foot placement on individual legs affected the margin established at each foot placement. We found that wider paretic foot pl acement relative to pelvis than non-paretic

PAGE 103

103 specifically related to wider stab ility margin established on the pa retic side. However, there was no relation between the lateral foot placement asymmetry and th e non-paretic stability margin suggesting that the wider paretic foot placement relative to non-paretic may specifically establish a wider stability margin at paretic foot placement. As expected, step width related to both paretic and non-paretic stability margins indicating that a wider step in general related to a wider stability margin. A wider margin specifically on one side can predispose lateral instability since the COM was closer to the margin of the base of support on one side than other. Since there was no relation between step width a nd lateral foot placement asymme try, persons taking wider steps may have a wider or narrower margin on the pa retic side relative to non-paretic and it may be difficult to identify those persons with lateral in stability. Further, while the wider step on the paretic side related to decrease weight support it increased the stab ility margin on the paretic side indicating that ML asymmetry might be comp ensatory to increase the dynamic stability. Therefore, we suggest that latera l foot placement relative to pelv is is a useful outcome measure to quantify both paretic leg weight support and dynamic stability. Limitations There are som e limitations in this st udy. The current study was conducted over the treadmill and foot placement relative to body might differ overground. Nonetheless, it is expected that while absolute foot placement (in isolation) might be altered (i.e., longer versus shorter step lengths) while walking overground, its relation to the body movements remain consistent suggesting the functional relevan ce of foot placement relative to body. This hypothesis could be tested in future studies by ex ploring the step-by-step variability in foot placement relative to body and whether this changes from treadmill to overground walking. Hip and knee kinematics were not explored in th e current study. Since the foot is under multisegmental and end-point control, it is expected that the foot kinematics relative to body will be

PAGE 104

104 the end result of different combinations of hi p and knee kinematics such that investigation of foot kinematics relative to body might be a relatively easy method to understand post-stroke walking from a control model viewpoint. Conclusions Post-stroke gait is asym metric when quantifying foot placement relative to pelvis in both AP and ML directions. We suggest that for the AP direction, ch aracterizing stepping relative to the other foot (i.e., step le ngth) was appropriate as outcomes to quantify asymmetrical performance and forward progression because stepping relative to the other foot and stepping in a body reference frame were associated. Nonethele ss, since some borderline asymmetrical (PSR = 55 65%) and other symmetrical persons show differing performance in the translating reference frame, it may be additionally useful to i nvestigate foot placement relative to pelvis in these persons. Further, we could understand motor control mechanisms in the asymmetrical subgroups (impaired initial conditions in the Longe r paretic group versus imp aired stepping ability in the Shorter paretic group) by investigating th e foot position patterns relative to pelvis. For the ML direction, we suggest using foot placem ent relative to pelvis as an outcome to characterize hemiparetic performance. A wider f oot placement of the pa retic foot relative to pelvis than non-paretic can quantify the reduced weight supported on the paretic leg and lateral instability. Overall, we were able to bette r evaluate asymmetrical performance during hemiparetic walking by investigating foot placemen t and position in a body reference frame that was not revealed when investiga ting stepping relative to other f oot. Therefore, we suggest that biomechanical analyses quantifying stepping pe rformance in impaired populations should investigate foot placement in a body reference frame (especially in the ML direction) to understand motor control during gait.

PAGE 105

105 Table 5-1. Definition of study variables Foot placement and position relative to body Anterior-Posterior AP Foot placement relative to pelvis: Distance in AP direction from foot COM to pelvis COM at the initial foot placement (ground-contact in the 1st double-support). AP Foot position relative to pelvis: Distance in AP direction from foot COM to pelvis COM at the terminal foot position (toe-off in the 2nd double-support phase). Medial-Lateral ML Foot placement relative to pelvis: Distance in ML direction from foot COM to pelvis COM at the initial foot placement (ground-contact in the 1st double-support). ML Foot position relative to pelvis: Distance in AP direction from foot COM to pelvis COM at the terminal foot position (toe-off in the 2nd double-support phase). Stepping relative to the other foot Step length: Distance in AP direction from leading mid-foot to trailing mid-foot at the the initial foot placement (ground-contact in the 1st double-support). Step width: Distance in ML direction from leading mid-foot to trailing mid-foot at the the initial foot placement (ground-contact in the 1st double-support). Walking performance measures Step length asymmetry: calculated as a Paretic step ratio (PSR = Paretic step length / (Paretic + Nonparetic step length) and expressed as a percentage. Paretic propulsion: Paretic propulsive impulse / (Pare tic + Non-paretic propulsive impulse). Percent weight supported on the paretic leg: Paretic average vertical force / (Paretic + Non-paretic average vertical force) expressed as a percentage. Dynamic stability margin: ML Distance between the extrapolated COM (xCOM = COM displacement + COM velocity) and foot COM.

PAGE 106

106 Figure 5-1. Illustration of marker positions for kinematic data collection and the SIMM model generated

PAGE 107

107 Figure 5-2. Calculation of anterior-p osterior and medial-lateral foot placements relative to pelvis This figure presents the foot placement and positi on variables calculated relative to pelvis. These variables were calculated as th e AP and ML distance between foot COM and pelvis COM. Note, the yellow arrows present the step length and step width calculated relative to other foot. Anterior foot placement relative to pelvis Posterior foot position relative to pelvis Lateral foot placement relative to pelvis Anterior-Posterior Medial-Lateral

PAGE 108

108 a. Anterior-Posterior foot pl acement relative to pelvis b. Medial-Lateral foot placement relative to pelvis Figure 5-3. Foot placement relative to pe lvis during hemiparetic and healthy gait Abbreviations: GC Ground contact at 1st double-s upport (initial foot placement), TO Toe-off at 2nd double-support (terminal foot position), PParetic foot, N-Non-paretic foot, C-Control foot. The box plots indicate the range in the data. The central horizontal line is the median of the sample. The length of the box indicates the in ter-quartile range with the upper and lower boundaries of the box indicating the upper and lower quartile, resp ectively. Circles represent sample values that statistically indicate outlier or extreme values (by SPSS software).

PAGE 109

109 Figure 5-4. Relationship between anterior foot pl acement asymmetry relative to pelvis and step length asymmetry in participants with hemiparesis This figure shows the relationship between asymme try in foot placements relative to pelvis (body reference frame) and step length asymmetry (relative to the other foot). The vertical dashed lines indicate the st ep length symmetry ranges (45 PSR 55) and the horizontal dashed lines indicate symmetry ranges in the body reference frame (46 PSR 54) calculated similarly from healthy controls. Persons above the range take Longer paretic steps than non-paretic and those below the range take Shorter paretic steps than non-paretic. Note that, four persons (black arrow) taking longer paretic than non-pa retic step lengths placed their paretic and nonparetic feet symmetric with respect to the pelv is. On the other hand, three persons (red arrow) who were taking symmetric step leng ths place their paretic foot clos er to pelvis than non-paretic (i.e. shorter paretic steps in the body reference frame). Step length asymmetry % (PSR)

PAGE 110

110 -300 -200 -100 0 100 200 300 400 3035404550556065707580859095100105110115120Ste p len g th as y mmetr y ( PSR % ) Posterior foot position Anterior foot placement (mm) Non-paretic foot placement (GC) Paretic foot position (TO) Figure 5-5. Relationship between step length asy mmetry and anterior-posterior foot placement relative to pelvis in participants with hemiparesis This figure shows the relationship between step length asymmetry and between-phase asymmetry in foot placements relative to pe lvis. The step length symmetry ranges (45 PSR 55) were calculated similarly fr om healthy controls. Note the pos terior paretic foot position in persons taking Longer paretic steps (PSR > 55). Some persons with severe asymmetry (PSR > 70%) never position their paretic foot posterior to the pelvis in th is phase of their gait cycle (2nd double support). Similarly, severely asymmetric persons taking Shorter paretic steps (PSR < 40%) place paretic foot much ante rior to pelvis than posterior at toe-off. Also, compare the paretic posterior and non-paretic anterior placemen t relative to pelvis between the symmetric and asymmetric persons. r = .607 r = -.467

PAGE 111

111 0.43 0.44 0.45 0.46 0.47 0.48 0.49 0.5 0.51 0.52 0.530.40.450.50.550.60.650.70.75Lateral foot placement asymmetry Average weight supported on paretic leg Figure 5-6. Relationship between paretic and non-paretic latera l foot placement asymmetry relative to pelvis and percent weig ht supported on the paretic leg Note that greater lateral foot placement asymmetry (i.e., paretic foot placed wider relative to pelvis than non-paretic foot pl acement relative to pelvis) le sser the weight supported on the paretic leg during the stance phase. r = -0.560**

PAGE 112

112 CHAPTER 6 EVALUATION OF STEP LENGTH GENERATION DURING POST-STROKE HEMIPARE TIC WALKING USING A NOV EL METHODOLOGY OF STEP-BY-STEP VARIABILITY IN GAIT DATA Introduction While hem iparetic walking is asymmetric, the underlying mechanisms responsible for step length generation during walking ar e not clearly understood in this population. Step lengths are reported to be shorter, asymmetric and variable from step to step during hemiparetic walking compared to healthy walking [5, 18, 69, 198]. Shor ter step lengths are co mmonly associated to the slower walking speeds post-str oke [53]. Nonetheless, it is like ly that underlying sensorimotor and muscular impairments post-stroke directly influence the attained step lengths beyond changes due to the slower walking speeds. In part icular, step lengths are also asymmetric during hemiparetic walking with the direction of asym metry being inconsistent. Reports suggest that there are a greater number of persons taking longer paretic steps than no n-paretic and few take relatively shorter paretic steps than non-paretic [69, 194]. A subcategory of persons also walk with relatively symmetric steps [194]. The inte r-subject variability in step length asymmetry suggests that the underlying neuromotor mechanisms controlling paretic st ep lengths could vary within these sub-groups of the hemiparetic population. Furthermore, there is considerable variability in step lengths on a step-by-step ba sis within individual str oke participants, with greater step-to-step variability reported in the mo re severe participants (unpublished data). This suggests that evaluation of the neuromotor mech anisms controlling step length generation needs to account for the subject-specific step-by-step variability in step length generation. Therefore, in this study, mechanisms of step length genera tion during hemiparetic walking were evaluated using a novel methodology that incorpor ates this within-subjects step -by-step variability in step lengths.

PAGE 113

113 Several potential contributing factors are likely to affect attained step lengths. Current evidence indicates that step length generation can be influenced primarily by the: 1) initial conditions at the initiation of sw ing phase of the ipsilateral leg, 2) biomechanics of the early (primarily accelerating) and late swing phase (pri marily decelerating) of the ipsilateral leg, and 3) contralateral stance leg ground reaction forces during its early and late single-support phase (usually braking and propulsive respectively, in healthy subject s), occurring simultaneously with the ipsilateral swing phase. Initial conditions of the leg (e .g. kinematics, kinetics and musc le activity in the pre-swing phase) are suggested to define the resulting sw ing leg trajectory [173]. For instance, dynamic simulations of swing phase in healthy gait performed in the ab sence of muscle joint torques approximated normal knee kinematics by selecting th e initial angular velocities and positions alone [164, 203], implying that the initial angula r velocity is an important determinant of kinematics during swing. Initial conditions prior to swing also provide the energy to the swinging leg [204, 205]. Therefore, the strong influence of initial conditions on th e ipsilateral swing phase of the gait cycle, can indirectly affect where the leg is placed at the end of the swing phase. Nonetheless, while the init ial conditions of the leg prior to swing phase should be partially predictive of swing phase characteristics, swing phase muscle activity is likely to either augment the leg flexion during swing (presumably by leg fl exors) or decelerate the leg to terminate the swing (e.g., hamstrings muscle activity). Therefor e, events occurring spec ifically during swing phase of the gait cycle can independently control the eventual step length. In support, Varraine et al. (2003) showed that when healthy participants were asked to voluntarily modulate their step lengths, they lengthened the time the leg was held in the swing phase [ 182]. Consequently, they proposed that controlling the swinging leg trajectory by alteri ng the swing phase parameters

PAGE 114

114 enabled the healthy participants to step longer. Therefore, while initial conditions prior to swing phase can indirectly control step lengths (by its influence on the swing phase), events during the swing phase present pote ntially direct mechanisms that can control step lengths. Lastly, contralateral stance leg ground reaction forces occu rring at the same instan ce as ipsilateral swing phase can influence step length generation. Recen t work showed a strong negative relationship between propulsive force asymmetry and step length asymmetry that highlights the causal relationships between ground reactio n forces and step lengths [ 194]. In particular, the finding that persons who take longer pare tic steps than non-pa retic generate lesser paretic leg propulsion; suggests that the greater compensatory non-pareti c leg propulsion might be causing the trunk to progress further forward as the paretic leg is st epping, thereby resulting in the relatively longer paretic steps. Overall, current li terature suggests several potential indirect and direct mechanisms related to the initial conditions of the leg, swi ng phase and contralateral stance phase that might influence step length generation. In this study, we selected kinematic and kineti c measures that independently describe each of these phases of the hemiparetic gait cycle. Leg or ientation at toe-off, pelvis velocity at toe-off and ankle joint center velocity at toe-off determin ed the initial state of the leg and body before the leg begins to swing. Hip Impulse in early and late swing and corre sponding contralateral Anterior-posterior (AP) ground reaction force (G RF) impulses were chosen to represent the events in the ipsilateral swing phase and corr esponding contralateral st ance phase, respectively. We hypothesized that the kinematic and kinetic measures that desc ribe each of these phases of the hemiparetic gait cycle would relate to step le ngths and explain step length variability withinsubjects. In particular, we hypot hesized that contralateral AP GRF impulses would be a strong predictor of step length variability in majority of persons. Whereas, hip impulse in ipsilateral

PAGE 115

115 swing will be a strong predictor of step length va riability in persons taking longer paretic steps than non-paretic. Regression models were built for individual subjects using gait data from each step because we wanted to evaluate the kinematic and kinetic parameters that best predicted the step length variability within-subjects. In summary, the purpose of this study was to comprehensively evaluate the underlying mechanisms of step length generation during hemiparetic gait by determining the predictors that explain the step length (step-by-step) variability within-subjects. Methods Participants Participan ts were a convenience sample of th irty-eight persons with chronic hemiparesis (Average Age = 60.21 12.32 years, 20 men, 19 left -side hemiparesis) and twenty similarlyaged healthy participants (Age = 66.15 10.03 ye ars, 4 men) evaluated at the VA-UF Human motor performance laboratory, VA Medical center at Gainesville Florida. Table 6-1 presents the individual subject characteristics for the hemiparetic participants. Healthy subjects data were used to calculate the step length symmetry ranges for the hemiparetic participants. Inclusion criteria for the participants were: hemiparesis se condary to a single onset unilateral stroke; ability to ambulate independently with or without an assistive device over 10 m on a level surface; ability to walk on a regular basis at least at home; absence of significant lower extremity joint pain and major sensory deficits; absence of signi ficant lower limb contractures and no significant cardiovascular or respiratory symptoms contrai ndicative to walking. Participants from the study were excluded if they had any orthopedic or neurologic conditions in addition to stroke, had significant musculoskeletal problems other than stroke that limit hip and knee extension or ankle plantar flexion to neutral, or were unable to pr ovide informed consent. All participants in the

PAGE 116

116 study signed a written informed consent and Institutional Review Board of University of Florida approved the protocol. Procedures Retro-reflective m arkers were attached to the pa rticipant to collect bilateral 3D kinematics using a 12 camera VICON motion an alyses system. Markers were at tached to the head (top, left, right, front and back), trunk (C7, T10, clavicle sternum and right scapula), upper extremity (bilateral shoulders, elbows and wrists), lower extremity (bilateral knees and ankles) and the feet (tip of the toes, left and right side of forefoot, midpoint of forefoot and calcaneus). Clusters of reflective markers attached to rigid bodies were also located on the pelvis, bilateral thighs, shanks and feet. A fixed laborat ory coordinate reference frame was created within the VICON system that was placed at the le ft corner of the laboratory. At the beginning of the test se ssion, controls and participants with hemiparesis walked for 2-3 trials across a 12 ft long instrumented mat (GaitRite) at their self-selected walking speeds to collect over ground spatiotemporal parameters of steps and estimate their overground walking speeds. Subsequently, participants with hemiparesis walked on an instrumented split-belt treadmill (TECMACHINE) for three trials at their self -selected treadmill walking speed. The treadmill self-selected speeds were 10 30% slower than that over gr ound for participants with hemiparesis. All partic ipants completed three 30-second walking trials without use of an assistive device or ankle-foot or thosis. A safety harness mounted to the laboratory ceiling was worn across the shoulders and chest to protect th e participants in the event that they loose balance. Note, that no bodyweight was offloaded by the harness. Additionally, a physical therapist closely guarded the participants as they walked over the treadmill (although no manual support was provided by the therapist). To optimize capture of steady state data on the treadmill,

PAGE 117

117 each subject walked for 10 s prio r to each of the 30 s of data collection. Three-dimensional Ground Reaction Forces (GRFs) were measured from each half of th e treadmill along with kinematic data that were colle cted during the walking trials. Refer to Figure 6-1 showing a participant walking on the treadmill as kine matic and kinetic data were collected. Data Analyses Kinema tic data: Raw kinematic data was low-pass filt ered using a fourth-order zero-lag Butterworth filter with a 10 Hz cutoff frequency. Th e joint center and anatomical trajectories was fitted to an eight-segment musculoskeletal model generated using SIMM (MusculoGraphics, Inc.) consisting of a trunk (incl uding the mass of the torso, head and arms), pelvis and legs for each subject. Each lower extremity consisted of a thigh, shank and foot. The anthropometrics and inertial properties were based on that of de Leva [200]. Joint positions and velocities were calculated within the SIMM Motion Module. The ki nematic variable calc ulated in this study included the Leg orientation at to e-off that was defined as the a ngle between the vector from the pelvis COM to the foot COM and ve rtical. Leg orientation is negati ve when the foot is posterior to the pelvis (Figure 6-2). Kinetic data: Three-dimensional GRFs were sampled at 2000 Hz. Ground reaction force data was low-pass filtered using a fourth-order zero-lag Butterworth filter with a 20 Hz cutoff frequency. The SIMM Motion Module (MusculoGraphi cs, Inc.) was used to perform a standard inverse dynamics analysis to determine the inter-segmental joint moments. Kinetic data (GRFs and joint moments) were normalized by subject b ody weight and to 100% of the paretic leg gait cycle (paretic heel strike to pare tic heel strike). Kinetic data included the pelvis velocity at toeoff, ankle joint center velocity at toe-off, Hip impulse and AP impulse (Figure 6-2). Hip impulse was calculated as the time integral of the hip mo ment during early swing and late swing. Positive moment indicated flex or moments and negativ e moments indicated extensor moments. AP

PAGE 118

118 impulse was calculated as the time integral of the AP GRF during the si ngle-support phase of the contralateral leg occurring at the same instan ce as the ipsilateral sw ing phase (Figure 6-2). Positive impulses denoted propulsive (anterior) impulse and negative impulses denoted braking (posterior) impulse. Sub-division of the gait cycle: The stance phase of the gait cycle was subdivided into Bins to correspond with: the first double support phase following heel strike (Bin1), the first 50% of single leg stance (Bin 2), the second 50% of single leg stance (Bin 3) and the second double support phase during paretic pre-swing (Bin 4) Bins 1 through 4 were defined from GRF records. Additionally, the swing phase was sub-di vided into two phases: the first 50% of swing phase (Bin 5) and the second 50% of swing phase (Bin 6). The last instance of Bin 4 of stance phase was toe-off and the initial condition variables were calculated at this instance. The early and late hip impulses were calculated in Bin 5 and Bin 6 of swing pha se. The early and late contralateral AP impulses were calculated in Bin 2 and Bin 3 of stance phase. Statistical Analyses Stepwise Regression: Stepwise m odel-buildi ng techniques for regre ssion designs with a single dependent variable are described elsewhere [206]. The basic procedures involve (1) identifying an initial model, (2) iteratively steppi ng, that is, repeatedly altering the model at the previous step by adding or removing a predictor variable in accordance with the stepping criteria, and (3) terminating the search when stepping is no longer po ssible given the stepping criteria, or when a specified maximu m number of steps has been reached. In this study, step length was the dependent variable and the selected kinematic and kinetic variables were the independent vari ables. A stepwise regression mode l was used to select critical predictors (from the 7 hypothesized variables) that could account for the variability in step lengths for individual part icipants and indicate how much variance in step length was explained

PAGE 119

119 by these predictors (indicated by the R2 values ). Two regression models were built for each participants data to predict paretic and non-pa retic step length variability each. Therefore, overall 76 regression models were built for the 38 study participants. The step-wise regression was conducted by pooling individual steps from all trials together for individual participants. Note that for each participant different numbers of steps were analyzed (see Table 6-2 for the minimum number of steps analyzed) since each part icipant walked at their self-selected speed at a specific cadence. Only data from good steps of the participant were utilized (i.e., in the event that there was a crossover of a step these data were deleted for this step and the corresponding step). For some participants, there was a difference of 2-3 steps between paretic and non-paretic legs that depended on which leg took the first and last step. The stepping criteria for th is study was a significant relatio nship between the predictor variable and step length at p < .05. The chosen pr edictors could best expl ain the generated step lengths since they covaried (relat ed) with step lengths on a step-by-step basis. That is; greater or lesser value of the critical predictor variable th at was chosen related to longer or shorter step length in an individual partic ipant and therefore explained th e variability in step length generation in an individual participant. Entry p value for the stepwise regression model was set at less than 0.05 and removal p valu e was set at less than 0.10. Determination of step length asymmetry: St ep length asymmetry groups were determined based on the overground asymmetrical patterns in healthy control participants using a Paretic step ratio [PSR = Paretic step length/(Paretic + Non-paretic step length)] and expressed as a percentage [194]. Asymmetry in the hemiparetic participants was characterized based on symmetry ranges calculated from similarly-aged healthy partic ipants, as follows: Longer

PAGE 120

120 paretic steps than non-paretic (PSR > 52.5), Shorter paretic steps than non-paretic (PSR < 47.5) and Symmetric step lengths (47.5 PSR 52.5). Results Average gait characteris tics for individual part icipants with hemiparesis are presented in Table 6-2. There was no difference in step-by-step variability be tween paretic and non-paretic step lengths (p = .752). Majority of particip ants had paretic and nonparetic step length variability less than 5 cm (Figure 6-3). In general, greater variability was explained for the non-paretic step lengths than paretic for individual participants (com pare the difference in R2 values for individual participants in Tables 6-3 and 6-4). The explanat ory power of the models was also unrelated to the absolute magnitude of step-by-step variabil ity (standard deviation) in pare tic and non-paretic step lengths (p = .233). There were 2 participants for whom no predictor variables co uld explain the paretic step length variability at p < .05. In comparis on, there was no particip ant with unexplained nonparetic step length variability. Predictors of Step Length Variability and th e Differences in Selected Predictor V ariables across the Asymmetrical Sub-Groups Shorter paretic group For the paretic step length m odels, non-paretic AP impulse in late swing (APImp LS) was the most commonly selected variable related to paretic step lengths (Tab le 6-3). Further, it showed a positive association with step lengt hs wherever it was chosen. However, the nonparetic APImp LS occurring during paretic stepping were braking forces for several participants in this group (see Figure 6-4). Note that Pare tic Hip Impulse in early and late swing was not selected as a predictor variable related to paretic step lengt h variability in this group of participants.

PAGE 121

121 For the non-paretic step length models, pa retic APImp LS was the most commonly selected variable related to non-paretic step le ngths (Table 6-4). The paretic APImp LS occurring during non-paretic stepping was propulsive in this phase. Unlik e for the paretic step length models, non-paretic Hip Impulse in early and late swing showed a significant posi tive relation to non-paretic step lengths in 3/6 pa rticipants. Specifically, the nonparetic hip impulse was flexor in these participants. Symmetric group For the paretic step length m odels, non-paretic APImp LS (in 7/10 participants) and paretic leg orientation at toe-off (in 6/10 participants ) were the most commonly selected variables related to variability in i ndividual participants. While non-paretic APImp LS was positively related to paretic step lengths (Table 6-3), pa retic LO was negatively related to step lengths. Further, non-paretic APImp LS was propulsive in all but one pa rticipant (H12) and paretic leg orientation was extension in all participants. For the non-paretic step length models, non-pareti c ankle joint center (A JC) velocity at toeoff (7/10 participants), non-paretic Hip Impulse in early swing and paretic APImp LS (6/10 participants) were most commonly selected vari ables that related to non-paretic step length variability. Further, all these variables were positively relate d to non-paretic step lengths. Specifically, hip impulse was flexor in early swing and paretic AP impulse was primarily propulsive in late swing. Longer paretic group For the paretic step length m odels, paretic hip impulse in early swing and non-paretic AP impulse in early swing (APImp ES) were the most commonly selected variables that related to paretic step length variability (1 2/22 participants selected these variables). Note that, APImp in this group was more commonly selected in the early swing than late compared to the Shorter and

PAGE 122

122 Symmetric persons where APImp LS was more commonly selected (Table 6-3). However, paretic hip impulse in early sw ing showed a stronger relation with paretic step length in participants in this group compar ed to those selectively in the S horter paretic group (indicated in Table 6-3 by significant relations between, also refer to Figure 6-5). Both paretic hip impulse in early swing and non-paretic APImp ES were positively related to paretic step lengths (Figure 65). Note that paretic hip impulse in early swing was flexor in all participants. Non-paretic APImp ES was primarily propulsive in this phas e in majority of the participants (only 2/22 showed en tirely braking in this phase comp ared to most participants in Shorter paretic group who showed braking forces, Figure 6-4). For the non-paretic step length models, pareti c APImp LS and non-paretic hip impulse in early swing were most commonly se lected as predictors that related to non-paretic step length variability (15/22 participants showed significant relations for both of these variables). Both predictors were positively rela ted to non-paretic step lengths Non-paretic hip impulse was primarily flexor. Paretic APImp LS was primaril y braking in 10/22 partic ipants where it showed a significant relationship. Non-paretic AJC velocity at toe-of f (14/22 participants) was also among the commonly selected predic tors that related to non-paret ic step length variability. Discussion The purpose of this study was to comprehe nsively evaluate the m echanisms underlying step length generation during hemipa retic gait by determining those va riables that strongly relate to step length variability within -subjects. While recent work suggests potential mechanisms that might be related to step lengt hs during hemiparetic gait [194], there has been no systematic investigation to understand mechanisms underlyi ng step length generation during hemiparetic walking at a self-selected pace. To improve walking outcomes after a hemiparetic stroke, rehabilitation therapists commonly focus on incr easing the step lengths. Determining the most

PAGE 123

123 significant predictors that relate to step-by-st ep variability in step lengths post-stroke, can provide insights on those parameters that can be ta rgeted to change step lengths (i.e., increase step lengths or even redu ce step length asymmetry). Overall, the range of variance explained by the regression models suggested that our hypotheses that the events occurring during a) th e initial conditions prio r to ipsilateral swing phase, b) ipsilateral swin g phase, and c) contralateral stance phase relates to step lengths. Our current methodology (of individual subject regression models) enabled us to determine several mechanisms underlying step length generation and also helped us to delineate differential mechanisms in sub-groups of this asymmetrical population. Specifically, w ithin-subject analyses as used in our study is specific to our study quest ion where we want to understand kinematic and kinetic variables that relate to step lengths in individual participants. Contralateral Stance Leg Ground Reaction Force (AP Impulse during Ipsilateral Sw ing) is a Significant Predictor of Step Length Variability In majority of participants contralateral AP impulse (pr opulsion mostly) occurring at the same instance as ipsilateral swing was the most commonly selected variable that was related positively to step length variability, suggesting that an increase in the contralateral AP impulse resulted in a longer ipsilateral step length in in dividual participants (Table 6-3, 6-4). However, sub-groups showing asymmetrical performance s howed a difference in selection of either contralateral AP impulse during its early versus late phase. In persons taking Symmetric and Shorter paretic steps, non-pare tic AP impulse during late no n-paretic single-support phase related strongly to paretic step lengths. Contrarily, in persons taking Longer paretic steps several persons showed a strong relation between non-paretic AP im pulse in the early phase and paretic step lengths (Figure 6-5). Further, since compared to the Shorter paretic and Symmetric group, persons in this group primarily showed non-paretic leg propulsion in its

PAGE 124

124 early stance phase, it is likely that persons taking longer pareti c steps show additional increased non-paretic propulsive impulse that begins sooner in the gait cy cle (Figure 6-4). This greater non-paretic leg propulsive impulse might be propelling the tru nk further forward early during paretic leg swing phase resulting in the pare tic leg stepping longer than the non-paretic. Specifically, since impaired pare tic leg propulsion can be compen sated by increased non-paretic leg propulsion, persons in the L onger paretic group show greater compensatory non-paretic leg propulsion to offset the reduced paretic leg propulsion [194]. Therefore, while increased nonparetic leg propulsion in general related to a longer step le ngth; greater compensatory nonparetic leg propulsion that begins sooner resulted in a rela tively longer paretic step than nonparetic in the Longer paretic group. Further, note that comp ared to the non-paretic leg propulsion being selected more in early stance than la te; the paretic leg pr opulsion is selected more in late stance than early and is also primarily braking in nature suggesting the reduced paretic leg propulsion in th e Longer paretic group. Ipsilateral Hip Impulse in Early Swing is a Significant P redictor of Step Length Variability in Persons taking Longer Paretic than Non-Paretic Steps Hip impulse during initial swing showed a str ong relationship to step lengths. It was selected as a significant predictor explaining paretic step length variability specifically in the Longer paretic group of participants and as an important predictor expl aining non-paretic step length variability in majority of participants. No te that in participants taking Shorter paretic steps, paretic hip impulse did not significantly ex plain paretic step length variability (Table 6-3). Whereas, in participants taking Longer paretic steps and Symmertic steps, hip impulse in initial swing was one of the important variab les (Longer paretic > Symmetric) chosen by the regression models. Furthermore, the hip impulse was primarily flexor during early swing (Figure

PAGE 125

125 6-4) suggesting that this flexor moment during early swing was pivotal to accelerating the leg in this phase such that the step is longer. In particular, the weak relation between pare tic flexor moment in early swing and step length suggests that persons taki ng Shorter paretic step s might be at the limit of their paretic hip flexor moment generation ( due to impaired hip flexor ac tivity) such that it no longer correlates with step length on a st ep-by-step basis. Impaired pareti c flexor activity shortens the paretic steps relative to non-pare tic in the Shorter paretic gro up. Note that, the non-paretic hip impulse during early swing showed a significant re lationship to non-paretic step lengths in 3/6 participants further indicating the specific abse nce of relationship between paretic hip impulse and paretic step lengths in the Shorter paretic group (refer to Table 6-4) Therefore, we propose that the impaired paretic hip moment in early sw ing shortens the paretic step length resulting in asymmetrical shorter paretic steps than non-pa retic in this sub-group of participants. Note that while hip flexor moment in initia l swing was consistently positively related to step lengths, direction of relationship between hi p moments in late swing and step lengths was inconsistent. Hip moments during late swing can both accelerate and dece lerate the leg swing Flexor moments (from uniarticular hip flexors) during late swing can hold the leg longer in swing such that the leg steps longer, whereas ex tensor moments (often from biarticular muscles like hamstrings and gluteus maximus [53]) during late swing can terminate the swing phase such that the leg steps shorter. Inte restingly, most participants taki ng Shorter paretic steps showed paretic hip extensor moments, whereas 19/22 (H4 showed flexor activity) taking Longer paretic steps primarily showed hip flexor moments ev en in late swing phase (Figure 6-4). This observation further suggests the greater flexor related activity in the Longer paretic group compared to the Shorter paretic group. Furt her evaluation of EMG activity in individual

PAGE 126

126 participants and similar model bu ilding using EMG activity to expl ain step length variability can help implicate the specific muscles responsible for these observed kinetic relationships. Ankle-Joint Center Velocity at Toe-Off is a Significant Predictor of Non-Paretic Step Length Variability Ankle joint center veloc ity at toe-off was significantly pos itively related to non-paretic step length variability in majority of participants, suggesting that greater AJC velocity at toe-off accelerates the foot forward into swing. Contrari ly, AJC velocity was not as commonly selected to explain paretic step length variability. AJC velocity at toe-off will be affected by ankle excursion (plantarflexion) at toe-off, ankle mu scle paresis, spasticit y, increased antagonist coactivation and increased passive stiffness [207]. This indicate s that the paretic impairments commonly observed in majority of participants post-stroke can aff ect the AJC angular velocity at toe-off. Therefore, paretic AJC velocity at toeoff was not as strongly related to step lengths since majority of hemiparetic par ticipants might be at the limit of their paretic AJC velocity (due to impaired capacity). It is also possible that while there is little variation in AJC velocity withinsubjects, there would be considerable vari ation between-subjects and would contribute significantly to betw een-subject variation in step lengths. Leg Orientation at Toe-Off and Pelvis Velo city at Toe-Off and their Contributio n to Explaining Step Length Variability Leg orientation at toe-off was the second most commonly selected pred ictor variable that was significantly related to paretic step lengths in participants taking Symmetric steps. Note that, while it is expected that leg orientation would be negative at toe-off, there were seven hemiparetic participants (all taking Longer pareti c steps than non-paretic) with the leg oriented anterior to pelvis in this phase (i.e., showing positive values fo r paretic leg orientation for all steps that they walked) and four others who showed positive values for at least half of the steps that they took. Posterior leg orientation implies an extended leg at toe-off. Selection of paretic

PAGE 127

127 leg orientation specifically in the symmetric gro up suggests that these persons might be attaining appropriate leg extension that would acts to direct the ground r eaction forces appropriately to propel the trunk forward at the term inal stance phase. Pelvis veloci ty at toe-off was significantly related to step lengths only in few participants; suggesting that the velocity of the body during the initial conditions prior to ipsilateral swing was not a strong predictor of step lengths. Within-Subjects Regression Models The within-subjects regression methodology as used in our study is different from conventionally used methodology where average data for individual subjects are used to build one regression model. Within-subject analyses as used in our study are specific to our study question where we want to determine parameters that influence the step length variability in individual participants. Since each participant wa lks at their self-selected speed and at a predetermined cadence that differs across participants grouping all subjects data would confound the results if we want to determine those predictors that significantly relate to step-by-step variability in step lengths. For instance, when we averaged the data for individual subjects and ran one regression model to understand paretic st ep length generation between-participants, the predictor variable that related to between-subj ects were leg orientati on at toe-off that was negatively related to step length and hip impulse in early swing that was positively related to step lengths. This result suggests th at longer or shorter paretic step length between-participants related to how their leg was or iented at toe-off and hip impulse in early swing. While this information is valuable to understand why some pe rsons take longer steps than others, in order to effect changes in individual patients' perfor mances, it would be more essential to understand which predictor variables resulted in an increase or decrease in step length. Such an approach of individual-subject anal yses has been highlighted in earlier work [163]. Olney et al. (1994) in thei r attempt to understand the most cr itical variable s that predict

PAGE 128

128 walking speed suggested that the regression analysis done on the subjects deviations from their averages (i.e., the within-subject analyses) is mo re appropriate if the aim were to understand what variables can affect individual persons pe rformance. They suggested that their withinsubjects regression analyses were appropriate because it shows that the walking speed of a subject increases with appropria te changes in the chosen pred ictor variables. They also acknowledged that on the other hand between-subject analyses were more appropriate if the aim were to determine those variables that predict the walking speeds of different subjects. The individual-subject regre ssion analyses as used in our st udy accounted for the step-by-step variability in the initial conditions, swing phase and contralateral stance phase mechanisms that control step lengths and theref ore, provide strong evidence fo r mechanisms of step length generation. Limitations Gait variables are expected to be correlated. This quality of the variables is described as "m ulticollinearity." Although multicollinearity can be a problem in some regression modeling, it does not interfere in our study because 1) we tried to select relati vely independent variables; 2) we only had 7 predictor variables, and 3) Step wise procedures mitigate against the retention of highly correlated predictor variables. It is possible that the step-bystep variability in step lengths was directly related to the e xplanatory power of the models; suggesting that increased or decreased model variance could be simply due to increased or decrea sed step variability. Nonetheless, we found that there was no signifi cant relationship betw een the step-by-step variability in step lengths and the varian ce explained by both the paretic and non-paretic regression models indicating the m odels specificity in selecting those variables that best related to paretic step lengths. Further, extrinsic s ources of error might ha ve increased the step variability (i.e., differences in marker placement from subject to subject). However, since we

PAGE 129

129 used a within-subjects design these sources of variation were minimal. It is possible that there are other predictors that relate to step length va riability (e.g. knee and ankl e moments during initial conditions and during swing, pelvic displacements sp ecifically at the initial conditions prior to swing). Studies are warranted to systematically cons ider other predictors that might relate to step length variability. Conclusions Use of an individual-subjects design incorporat ing step-by-step variability in gait data helped us to determ ine the specific mechanisms that relate to step length generation. Based on chosen predictors that relate to step lengths, we are able to propose specific mechanisms that affect step length generation. Knowledge of thes e mechanisms, in turn, highlights rehabilitation strategies that can be targeted specifically to affect step le ngths and improve walking outcomes post-stroke. In the sub-group of persons taki ng Longer paretic step s than non-paretic, we suggest that improving paretic leg propulsion would increase the non-paretic step length that would reduce their asymmetry. On the other hand, in the sub-group taking Shorter paretic steps than non-paretic, improving the paretic hip flexor activity could lengthen the paretic steps and reduce their asymmetry. Future st udies should evaluate EMG muscle activity and its relation to step length variability to support and furthe r explain the current proposed mechanisms underlying step length generati on during hemiparetic walking.

PAGE 130

130 Table 6-1. Subject characteristics Note that Fugl-meyer grading is based on scores from lower-exremity fugl-meyer scale (synergy portion only maximum score = 22). Severe 14, Moderate = 15 18, Mild 19.

PAGE 131

131 Table 6-2. Average gait characterist ics for individual participants Note that min # of steps indicates the minimum number of good (paretic or non-paretic) steps that were used for data analyses for each participant pooling all trials together. Abbreviations: P Paretic; N Nonparetic; Cad Cadence; SL Step length; SwT Swing time.

PAGE 132

132 Table 6-3. Regression models for individual particip ants to predict paretic step length variability Numbering (1, 2 ,3) indicates the order in which the predictors were chosen for the individual participants. nr indicates no result.Blue represents participants taking S horter paretic steps, Green repr esents participants taking Symmetric steps and Red represents participants taking Longer paretic steps (PSR > 52.5). Abbreviations: Sub ID Subject; PSR Paretic Step ratio; LO Leg orientation at toe-off; PV Pelvis velocity at toe-off; AJC Ankle joint center velocity at toe-off; Hip Imp ES Hip Impulse during Early (1st 50%) swing; Hip Imp LS Hip Impulse during late (2nd 50%) swing; cAPImp ES Cont ralateral AP impulse during ipsilateral early swing; cAPImp LS Contralateral AP impulse during ipsilateral late swing.

PAGE 133

133 Table 6-4. Regression models for individual pa rticipants predicting non-paretic step length variability Numbering (1, 2 ,3) indicates the order in which the predictors were chosen for the individual participants. nr indicates no result.Blue represents participants taking S horter paretic steps, Green repr esents participants taking Symmetric steps and Red represents participants taking Longer paretic steps (PSR > 52.5). Abbreviations: Sub ID Subject; PSR Paretic Step ratio; LO Leg orientation at toe-off; PV Pelvis velocity at toe-off; AJC Ankle joint center velocity at toe-off; Hip Imp ES Hip Impulse during Early (1st 50%) swing; Hip Imp LS Hip Impulse during late (2nd 50%) swing; cAPImp ES Cont ralateral AP impulse during ipsilateral early swing; cAPImp LS Contralateral AP impulse during ipsilateral late swing.

PAGE 134

134 Figure 6-1.An individual participant walking on the split belt treadmill as kinematic, kinetic and EMG data were recorded

PAGE 135

135 Figure 6-2. Illustration of variables used in the study Kinematic and Kinetic profile is illustrated from one step duri ng walking for an individual participant. Note that all variables are normalized to the gait cycle. Red line indicates toe-off. Leg orientation, Pelvis velocity and Ankle joint center velocity calculated at toe-off were the initial condition variables. Hip impulse and Contralateral AP impulse during initial (1st 50%) and late (2nd 50%) swing were the swing phase variables calculated. Note that the impulse is calculated as the area under force curve. Raw profile for the Hip moment and AP GRF are not presented. The AP impulse presented in the figure is from the contralateral leg that is occurring at the same instance as the ipsilateral swing phase.

PAGE 136

136 1.20 1.00 0.80 0.60 0.40 0.20 Paretic step length standard deviation (m) 20 15 10 5 0 Number of subjects MEAN = 0.36 m 1.20 1.00 0.80 0.60 0.40 0.20 Non-paretic step length standard deviation (m) 20 15 10 5 0 Number of subjects MEAN = 0.40 m Figure 6-3. Frequency distribut ion of step-to-step variab ility in step lengths.

PAGE 137

137 A. Non-paretic AP Impulse Figure 6-4. Non-paretic AP impul se and Paretic hip impulse dur ing paretic stepping in the asymmetrical sub-groups

PAGE 138

138 B. Hip Impulse Figure 6-4. Continued. This figure presents the non-paretic AP impulse and hi p impulse from individual steps for the asymmetrical subgroups (n = 28; 22 taking longer paretic steps and 6 taking shorter paretic steps). Each row of data is a simple dot plot of the AP impulse or hip impulse for individual participants. The participants are lined based on the ascending order of the asymmetry (note that symmetric persons have not been presented here). For AP impulse, positive values on the right represent propulsive forces and negative values on the left represent braking forces. For Hip impulse, positive values on the right represent flexor moment and negative values represent positive moments. Note that the non-paretic AP impulse in early swing is pr imarily propulsive for the Longer paretic persons compared to several shorter paretic persons showing braking forces. Similarly, the non-paretic AP impulse in late swing is propulsive for most participants taking longer paretic step s compared to 3 participants in the Shorter paretic group showing more braking. Paretic hip impulse was flexor in early swing for most participants. Conversely, hip impulse was extensor for at least some participants in the late swing. Participants taking shorter paretic steps showed extensor moments (4/6) while the most asymmetric longer paretic persons (bottom rows) showed primarily flexor moments.

PAGE 139

139 0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4 0.220.270.320.37Paretic step length (m)Paretic Hip impulse in early swing 0 0.001 0.002 0.003 0.004 0.005 0.006 0.007 0.008 0.009 0.01 0.220.270.320.37Paretic step lengths (m)Non-paretic AP impulse Early swing Late swing Figure 6-5. Relationship between paretic hip impul se in early swing, non-pa retic AP impulse in early and late swing in an individual participant taking longer paretic steps than nonparetic PSR 69.8 Speed 0.30 m/s

PAGE 140

140 CHAPTER 7 CONCLUSIONS: INTEGRATING THE FINDINGS The asymmetr ical nature of hemiparetic gait is extensively documented [12-15]. Yet, there is considerable disagreement in the literature regarding the clinical relevance of evaluating asymmetrical gait post-stroke. This disagreemen t stems from two conflicting suggestions in the literature. Some authors report that gait symmetry should be an ideal objective in walking rehabilitation post-stroke due to the apparently asymmetrical na ture of hemiparetic walking [12, 208, 209]. While others highlight that since compensatory strategies can promote functional performance, normalization of movement patte rns should not be the primary focus of gait rehabilitation [5, 18]. We suggest that, while gait symmetry need not be the primary focus for walking rehabilitation, gait asymmetry should be evaluated to identify the unique paretic leg motor deficits and to understand how the pareti c leg impairments might limit functional walking performance. This dissertation aimed at quantifying gait asymmetry, understanding its relationship to walking performance and investigating mech anisms underlying gait asymmetry. Specifically, stepping asymmetry was investigated since spatiotemporal characte ristics of steps are the final outcomes of all events occurring in the gait cycl e. Further, since the stepping measures can be easily recorded, transition of our results to clinical settings can be easily facilitated. Step Length Asymmetry during Hemiparetic Walking While tem poral asymmetry is well understood [13], step length asymmetry is not well quantified and its relation to hemiparetic walking performance is unclear. Therefore, in study one of this dissertation, we prim arily quantified the step lengt h asymmetry patterns during hemiparetic walking and proposed some underl ying mechanisms in the asymmetrical subgroups. We were able to quantify the step le ngth asymmetry patterns using a step length

PAGE 141

141 asymmetry ratio and by relating the step length asymmetry to propulsive forces asymmetry. Our results also showed that while step length asymme try related to hemiparetic severity, it did not limit the attained walking speed highlighting ot her compensatory strategies to achieve the functional walking speeds. Our findings also sugg ested differing motor control mechanisms (i.e., ability to change speeds, weight supported on paretic leg) in persons showing different step length asymmetry patterns. Future work is encouraged to understand th e specific sensorimotor impairments related to the step length asym metry patterns and evaluate whether walking rehabilitation directed at these impairme nts can improve walking outcomes post-stroke. Step Variability during Hemiparetic Walking Study two of this dissertation investigated step variability to determ ine how gait variability m ight relate to asymmetrical walking post-stroke and whether measures of variability can be used as markers of impaired performance. Gait variability is shown to be strongly associated with motor and balance control during walking a nd suggested to be a quantifiable biomechanical marker to evaluates walking impairments [77]. Our results revealed that increased variability in most spatiotemporal characteristics and reduced width variability related to poor performance outcomes (severe hemiparesis, asymmetrical gait and poor balance). Specif ically, results showed an asymmetry in swing and pre-swing time step vari ability in participants with the most impaired performance. There was no difference in step length variability between paretic and non-paretic steps, suggesting that the step length asymmetry patterns are relativ ely consistent from step to step during hemiparetic walking. Specifically since step variability is shown to strongly predict the risk for falling [98, 103], the finding that the asymmetrical groups showed greater step variability than the symmetrical persons sugge sts the dynamic balance impairments in these persons. Future research is warra nted to determine specific thres holds of step variability to further validate the use of variability measures as performance markers.

PAGE 142

142 Asymmetrical Stepping in a Body Reference Frame Post-Stroke In study three of this dissertation, stepping asymm etry was quantified in a body reference frame. Literature shows that asymmetry in steps and asymmetry in body movements are investigated in isolation [11, 199] Nonetheless, since foot pla cement (during stepping) closely relates to body movements, it mi ght be essential to investigat e asymmetry in foot placement relative to body (rather th an in isolation). Our results showed that post-stroke anterior-posterior and medial-lateral foot placements were asymmetr ical relative to body and that this asymmetry related to step length asymmetry but not step widths. Wider pare tic foot placement relative to pelvis than non-paretic also re lated to reduced paretic leg weig ht support and lateral instability, encouraging the clinical utility of medial-lateral foot placement relative to pelvis. Since foot placement relative to body can be associated to forward progression and dynamic balance [132, 133], investigation of stepping asymmetry in a body reference frame also helped us propose underlying mechanisms of stepping asymmetry. Futu re studies are encouraged to evaluate the underlying kinematics of hip and knee to develop an integrated understanding of stepping in the asymmetrical groups. Step Length Generation during Hemiparetic Walking In study four of this dissertation, m echanisms of step length generation during hemiparetic walking were evaluated using a novel methodology that incorporated the step-by-step variability in step lengths. Literature sugge sts several potential i ndirect and direct mechanisms relates to step length [173, 182, 194] but there is no clear consen sus on predictors that relate to step length generation. Results revealed that contralateral anterior-posteri or and hip impulses during swing explained the step length variability in majority of participants. Relation of these predictors to step lengths differed based on st ep length asymmetry patterns, im plying differential mechanisms of step length generation across the sub-groups of persons showing differing step length

PAGE 143

143 asymmetries. Compared to persons taking shorte r paretic steps or symmetric steps, persons taking longer paretic steps showed early stan ce phase non-paretic leg propulsion, suggesting increased non-paretic propulsive impulse beginning sooner in the gait cycle. In participants taking shorter paretic steps, paretic hip impulse in initial swing was not st rongly related to paretic step lengths unlike persons in other groups for whom hip flexor impulse was a strong predictor of paretic step lengths. Based on these observations, we suggest that in persons taking longer paretic steps than non-paretic, improving paretic leg propulsion would in crease the non-paretic step length and reduce their asymmetry. While in persons taking shorter paretic steps than nonparetic, improving the paretic hip flexor activity could lengthen the pareti c steps and reduce their asymmetry. Future studies should evaluate EMG muscle activity and its relation to step length variability to support and furt her explain the current propose d mechanisms underlying step length generation in the step length asymmetry groups. Summary Our findings suggest that steppi ng asymm etry is a clin ically relevant measure to evaluate paretic leg performance post-st roke. We propose step length as ymmetry, asymmetry in swing and pre-swing time step variability and medial-lateral f oot placement relative to the pelvis as outcomes of asymmetrical walking performance. Our findings also suggest differential motor control mechanisms in persons walking with differing step length asymmetry patterns. Results of this dissertation highlight the need to evaluate gait asym metry post-stroke which would, in turn, enable us to differentiate physiological restitution from compensation during walking. Clinically, specificity in evaluati on would help to tailor locomotor retraining specifically to address the root causes of impaired ambulation for each individual.

PAGE 144

144 APPENDIX A LOWER EXREMITY FUGL-MEYER SCALE TEST ITEM SCOR ING CRITERIA Achilles 1. Reflex activity Patellar (KNEE FLEXION) 0-No reflex activity can be elicited 2-Reflex activity can be elicited 2. Within synergy Hip flexion (FLEXOR SYN HIP FLEX) Knee flexion (FLEXOR SYN KNEE FLEX) a. Flexor synergy (in supine) (FLEXOR SYN) Ankle dorsiflexion (FLEXOR SYN ANKLE DF) 0-cannot be performed at all 1-partial motion 2-full motion Hip extension (EXTENSOR SYN HIP EXT) Hip adduction (EXTENSOR SYN HIP ADD) Knee extension (EXTENSOR SYN KNEE EXT) b. Extensor synergy (in sidelying) (EXTENSOR SYN) Ankle plantarflexion (EXTR SYN ANKLE PF) 0-no motion 1-weak motion 2-almost full strength comapred to normal Knee flexion beyond 90 (COMBINE SYN KNEE FLEX) 0-no active motion 1-from slightly extended position, knee can be flexed, but not beyond 90 2-knee flexion beyond 90 3. Movement combining synergies (in sitting: knees free of chair) (COMBINE SYN) Ankle dorsiflexion (COMBINE SYN ANKLE DF) 0-no active flexion 1-incomplete active flexion 2-normal dorsiflexion Knee flexion (OUT OF SYN KNEE FLEX) 0-knee cnnot flex without hip flexion 1-knee begins flexion without hip flexion, but does not reach to 90, or hip flexes during motion 2-full motion as described 4. Movement out of synergy (in standing, hip at 0) (OUT OF SYN) Ankle dorsiflexion (OUT OF SYN ANKLE DF) 0-active motion 1-partial motion 2-full motion 5. Normal reflexes (sitting) Knee flexors Patellar Achilles 0-at least 2 of the 3 phasic reflexes are markedly hyperactive 1-one reflex is hyperactive, or at least 2 reflexes are lively 2-no more than one reflex is lively and none are hyperactive Tremor 0-marked tremor 1-slight tremor 2-no tremor Dysmetria 0-pronounced or unsystematic dysmetria 1-slight or systematic dysmetria 2-no dysmetria 6. Coordination/speed (supine : heel to opposite knee; 5 repititions in rapid succession) Speed 0-acticity is more than 6 seconds longer than unaffected side 1-(2-5) seconds longer than unaffected side 2-less than 2 seconds difference

PAGE 145

145 APPENDIX B DYNAMIC GAIT INDEX SCALE Gait level surface _____ Instructions: Walk at your normal speed from here to the next mark (20) Grading: Mark the lowest category that applies. (3) Normal: Walks 20, no assistive devices, good sped, no evidence for imbalance, normal gait pattern (2) Mild Impairment: Walks 20, uses assistive devices, slower speed, mild gait deviations. (1) Moderate Impairment: Walks 20, slow speed, abnormal gait pattern, evidence for imbalance. (0) Severe Impairment: Cannot walk 20 without a ssistance, severe gait deviations or imbalance. Change in gait speed _____ Instructions: Begin walking at your normal pace (for 5), when I tell you go, walk as fast as you can (for 5). When I tell you slow, walk as slowly as you can (for 5). Grading: Mark the lowest category that applies. (3) Normal: Able to smoothly change walking speed without loss of balance or gait deviation. Shows a significant difference in walking speeds between normal, fast and slow speeds. (2) Mild Impairment: Is able to change speed but dem onstrates mild gait deviations, or not gait deviations but unable to achieve a significant change in velocity, or uses an assistive device. (1) Moderate Impairment: Makes only minor adjustments to walking speed, or accomplishes a change in speed with significant gait deviations, or changes speed but has significant gait deviations, or changes speed but loses balance but is able to recover and continue walking. (0) Severe Impairment: Cannot change speeds, or lo ses balance and has to reach for wall or be caught. Gait with horizontal head turns _____ Instructions: Begin walking at your normal pace. When I tell y ou to look right, keep wa lking straight, but turn your head to the right. Keep looking to the right until I tell you, look left, then keep walking straight and turn your head to the left. Keep your head to the left until I tell you look straight, then keep walking straight, but return your head to the center. Grading: Mark the lowest category that applies. (3) Normal: Performs head turns smoothly with no change in gait. (2) Mild Impairment: Performs head turns smoothly with slight change in gait velocity, i.e., minor disruption to smooth gait path or uses walking aid. (1) Moderate Impairment: Performs head turns with moderate change in gait velocity, slows down, staggers but recovers, can continue to walk. (0) Severe Impairment: Performs task with severe disruption of gait, i.e., staggers outside 15 path, loses balance, stops, reaches for wall. Gait with vertical head turns _____ Instructions: Begin walking at your normal pace. When I tell y ou to look up, keep walking straight, but tip your head up. Keep looking up until I tell you, look down, then keep walking straight and tip your head down. Keep your head down until I tell you look straight, then keep walking straight, but return your head to the center. Grading: Mark the lowest category that applies. (3) Normal: Performs head turns smoothly with no change in gait. (2) Mild Impairment: Performs head turns smoothly with slight change in gait velocity, i.e., minor disruption to smooth gait path or uses walking aid. (1) Moderate Impairment: Performs head turns with moderate change in gait velocity, slows down, staggers but recovers, can continue to walk. (0) Severe Impairment: Performs task with severe disruption of gait, i.e., staggers outside 15 path, loses balance, stops, reaches for wall.

PAGE 146

146 Dynamic Gait Index continued. Gait and pivot turn _____ Instructions: Begin walking at your normal pace. When I tell you, turn and stop, turn as quickly as you can to face the opposite direction and stop. Grading: Mark the lowest category that applies. (3) Normal: Pivot turns safely within 3 seconds and stops quickly with no loss of balance. (2) Mild Impairment: Pivot turns safely in > 3 seconds and stops with no loss of balance. (1) Moderate Impairment: Turns slowly, requires verbal cueing, requires several small steps to catch balance following turn and stop. (0) Severe Impairment: Cannot turn safely requires assistance to turn and stop. Step over obstacle ____ Instructions: Begin walking at your normal speed. When you come to the shoebox, step over it, not around it, and keep walking. Grading: Mark the lowest category that applies. (3) Normal: Is able to step over the box without changing gait speed, no evidence of imbalance. (2) Mild Impairment: Is able to step over box, but must slow down and adjust steps to clear box safely. (1) Moderate Impairment: Is able to step over box but must stop, then step over. May require verbal cueing. (0) Severe Impairment: Cannot perform without assistance. Step around obstacles _____ Instructions: Begin walking at normal speed. When you come to the first cone (about 6 away), walk around the right side of it. When you come to the second cone (6 past first cone), walk around it to the left. Grading: Mark the lowest category that applies. (3) Normal: Is able to walk around cones safely without changing gait speed; no evidence of imbalance. (2) Mild Impairment: Is able to step around both cones, but must slow down and adjust steps to clear cones. (1) Moderate Impairment: Is able to clear cones but must significantly slow, speed to accomplish task, or requires verbal cueing. (0) Severe Impairment: Unable to clear cones, walks into one or both cones, or requires physical assistance. Steps _____ Instructions: Walk up these stairs as you would at home, i.e., using the railing if necessary. At the top, turn around and walk down. Grading: Mark the lowest category that applies. (3) Normal: Alternating feet, no rail. (2) Mild Impairment: Alternating feet, must use rail. (1) Moderate Impairment: Two feet to a stair, must use rail. (0) Severe Impairment: Cannot do safely. TOTAL SCORE: ___ / 24 Adapted from: Herdman SJ. Vestibular Rehabilitation. 2nd ed. Philadelphia, PA: F.A.Davis Co; 20

PAGE 147

147 LIST OF REFERENCES 1. Am erican-Heart-Association. 2002 Heart and Stroke Statistical Update http://www.americanheart.org/ downloadable/heart/HS_State_02.pdf Acc essed 12 March 2008. Dallas, Texas. 2. Duncan PW, Stason WB, Adams HP, Adelma n AM, Alexander DN, Bishop DS, Diller L, Donaldson NE, Grager CV, Holland AL. Post-Stroke Rehabilitation: Clincal Practice Guideline. 1995. Rockville, Maryland. 3. Han B, Haley WE. Family caregiving for patients with stroke. Review and analysis Stroke 1999;30(7):1478-85. 4. Stineman MG, Maislin G, Fiedler RC, Granger CV. A prediction model for functional recovery in stroke Stroke 1997;28(3):550-6. 5. Olney SJ, Richards C. Hemiparetic gait following stroke. Part I: Characteristics Gait & Posture 1996;4:136-48. 6. Nadeau S, Arsenault AB, Gravel D, Bourbonna is D. Analysis of the clinical factors determining natural and maximal ga it speeds in adults with a stroke Am J Phys Med Rehabil 1999;78(2):123-30. 7. Bowen A, Lincoln NB, Dewey M. Cognitive rehabilitation for spatial neglect following stroke Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2002;(2):CD003586. 8. Mercier L, Audet T, Hebert R, Rochette A, Dubois MF. Impact of motor, cognitive, and perceptual disorders on ability to perform activities of daily living after stroke Stroke 2001;32(11):2602-8. 9. Bohannon RW, Andrews AW, Smith MB. Re habilitation goals of patients with hemiplegia Int J Rehabil Res 1988;11:181-83. 10. Dobkin BH. Clinical practice. Rehabilitation after stroke N Engl J Med 2005;352(16):1677-84. 11. von Schroeder HP, Coutts RD, Lyden PD, Billings E, Jr., Nickel VL. Gait parameters following stroke: a practical assessment J Rehabil Res Dev 1995;32(1):25-31. 12. Wall JC, Turnbull GI. Gait asymmetries in residual hemiplegia Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1986;67(8):550-3. 13. Brandstater ME, de Bruin H, Gowland C, Clark BM. Hemiplegic gait: analysis of temporal variables Arch Phys Med Reha bil 1983;64(12):583-7.

PAGE 148

148 14. Patterson KK, Parafianowicz I, Danells CJ, Closson V, Verrier MC, Staines WR, Black SE, McIlroy WE. Gait asymmetry in community-ambulating stroke survivors Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2008;89(2):304-10. 15. Titianova EB, Tarakka IM. Asymmetry in wa lking performance and postural sway in patients with chronic unilateral cerebral infarction J Rehabil Res Dev 1995;32(3):236-44. 16. Chen CL, Chen HC, Tang SF, Wu CY, Ch eng PT, Hong WH. Gait performance with compensatory adaptations in stroke patient s with different degrees of motor recovery. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 2003;82(12):925-35. 17. Griffin MPO, S.J.; McBride, I.D. The role of symmetry in gait performance of stroke subjects with hemiplegia Gait & Posture 1995;3:132-42. 18. Kim CM, Eng JJ. Magnitude and pattern of 3D kinematic and kinetic gait profiles in persons with stroke: rela tionship to walking speed Gait Posture 2004;20(2):140-6. 19. Kim CM, Eng JJ. Symmetry in vertical ground reaction force is accompanied by symmetry in temporal but not distance va riables of gait in persons with stroke. Gait Posture 2003;18(1):23-8. 20. Craik R, Dutterer L. Spatial and temporal characteristics of f oot fall patterns. In: Gait Analysis: Theory and Application 1995. Editors: Craik R,Oati s C. Mosby-Year Book, St. Louis, Missouri. 143-58. 21. Mizrahi J, Susak Z, Heller L, Najenson T. Variation of time-distance parameters of the stride as related to clinical gait improvement in hemiplegics Scand J Rehabil Med 1982;14(3):133-40. 22. Prokop T, Berger W, Zijlstra W, Dietz V. Adaptational and learning processes during human split-belt locomotion: interaction betw een central mechanisms and afferent input Exp Brain Res 1995;106(3):449-56. 23. Sadeghi H, Allard P, Prince F, Labelle H. Symmetry and limb dominance in able-bodied gait: a review Gait Posture 2000;12(1):34-45. 24. Hausdorff JM. Gait dynamics, fractals and fall s: Finding meaning in the stride-to-stride fluctuations of human walking Hum Mov Sci 2007;26(4):555-89. 25. Zehr EP. Neural control of rhythmic human movement: the common core hypothesis Exerc Sport Sci Rev 2005;33(1):54-60. 26. Whelan PJ. Control of loco motion in the decerebrate cat Prog Neurobiol 1996;49(5):481-515.

PAGE 149

149 27. Shumway-Cook A, Woollacott M. Motor Control: Theory and Practical Applications. 2001. Lippincott Williams and Wilkins; Philadelphia. 28. Craik R, Oatis C. Gait Analysis: Theory and Application .1995. Mosby-Year Book; St. Louis, Missouri. 29. Perry J. Chapter 2 Phases of gait. In: Gait Analysis: Normal and Pathological Function. 1992. Editor: Perry J. Slack; Thorofare, New Jersey. 9. 30. O' Sullivan SB, Schmitz TJ. Physical Rehabilitation Assessment and Treatment 2000. 4th Edition. Davis Compa ny; Philadelphia. 1168. 31. American-Heart-Association. American-Heart-Association: Heart Disease and stroke statistics 2003 update. 2003. Dallas, Texas. 32. Kannel WB, Wolf PA, Verter J, McNamara PM Epidemiologic assessm ent of the role of blood pressure in stroke. The Framingham study JAMA 1970;214(2):301-10. 33. Black-Schaffer RM, Osberg JS. Return to work after stroke: development of a predictive model Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1990;71(5):285-90. 34. Goldie PA, Matyas TA, Kinsella GJ, Gal ea MP, Evans OM, Bach TM. Prediction of gait velocity in ambulatory stroke patients during rehabilitation Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1999;80(4):415-20. 35. Richards CL, Malouin F, Dean C. Gait in stroke: assessment and rehabilitation Clin Geriatr Med 1999;15(4):833-55. 36. Knutsson E, Richards C. Different types of di sturbed motor control in gait in hemiparetic patients Brain 1979;102(Pt 2):405-30. 37. Richards C, Malouin F, W ood-Dauphinee S. Gait velocity as an outcome measure of locomotor recovery after stroke. In: Gait Analysis: Theory and Applications 1995. Editors: Craik R,Oatis C. Mosby-Ye ar Book, St. Louis, Missouri.355-64. 38. Sahrmann SA, Norton BJ. The relationship of voluntary movement to spasticity in the upper motor neuron syndrome Ann Neurol 1977;2(6):460-5. 39. Alexander MP. Stroke rehabi litation outcome. A potential use of predictive variables to establish levels of care Stroke 1994;25(1):128-34. 40. Thirumala P, Hier DB, Patel P. Motor recovery after stroke: lessons from functional brain imaging Neurol Res 2002;24(5):453-8. 41. Sahrmann SA, Norton BJ. The relationship of voluntary movement to spasticity in the upper motor neuron syndrome Ann Neurol 1977;2(6):460-5.

PAGE 150

150 42. Dietz V, Berger W. Interlimb coordination of posture in patients w ith spastic paresis. Impaired function of spinal reflexes Brain 1984;107(Pt 3):965-78. 43. Teasell R. Stroke recovery and rehabilitation Stroke 2003;34(2):365-6. 44. Barbeau H, Fung J. The role of rehabili tation in the recovery of walking in the neurological population Curr Opin Neurol 2001;14(6):735-40. 45. Wolpaw JR, Carp JS. Adaptiv e plasticity in spinal cord. Adv Neurol 1993;59:163-74. 46. Bouyer LJ, Whelan PJ, Pearson KG, Rossignol S. Adaptive locomotor plasticity in chronic spinal cats after ankle extensors neurectomy J Neurosci 2001;21(10):3531-41. 47. Twitchell TE. The restoration of moto r function following hemiplegia in man Brain 1951;74(4):443-80. 48. Burdett RG, Borello-France D, Blatchly C, Potter C. Gait comparison of subjects with hemiplegia walking unbraced, with ankle-f oot orthosis, and with Air-Stirrup brace. Phys Ther 1988;68(8):1197-203. 49. Wade DT, Wood VA, Heller A, Maggs J, Langton Hewer R. Walking after stroke. Measurement and recovery over the first 3 months Scand J Rehabil Med 1987;19(1):2530. 50. Richards CL, Malouin F, W ood-Dauphinee S, Williams JI, Bouchard JP, Brunet D. Taskspecific physical therapy for optimization of gait recovery in acu te stroke patients Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1993;74(6):612-20. 51. Richards CL, Malouin F, Dumas F, Tardiff D. Gait velocity as an outcome measure of locomotor recovery after stroke. In: Gait Analysis: Theory and Applications 1995. Editors: Craik R,Oatis C. Mosby-Year Book, St. Louis, Missouri. 355-64. 52. Keenan MA, Perry J, Jordan C. Factor s affecting balance and ambulation following stroke Clin Orthop 1984 182):165-71. 53. Lamontagne A, Stephenson JL, Fung J. Physio logical evaluation of ga it disturbances post stroke Clin Neurophysiol 2007;118(4):717-29. 54. Dean CM, Richards CL, Malouin F. Wa lking speed over 10 metres overestimates locomotor capacity after stroke Clin Rehabil 2001;15(4):415-21. 55. Kautz SA, Brown DA. Relationships between timing of muscle excitation and impaired motor performance during cyclical lower extr emity movement in post-stroke hemiplegia Brain 1998;121(Pt 3):515-26.

PAGE 151

151 56. Reisman DS, Wityk R, Silver K, Bastian AJ. Locomotor adaptation on a split-belt treadmill can improve walking symmetry post-stroke Brain 2007;130(Pt 7):1861-72. 57. Higginson JS, Zajac FE, Neptune RR, Kautz SA, Delp SL. Muscle contributions to support during gait in an individual with post-stroke hemiparesis J Biomech 2006;39(10):1769-77. 58. Wagenaar RC, Meijer OG, van Wieringen PC, Kuik DJ, Hazenberg GJ, Lindeboom J, Wichers F, Rijswijk H. The functional rec overy of stroke: a comparison between neurodevelopmental treatment and the Brunnstrom method Scand J Rehabil Med 1990;22(1):1-8. 59. News: Strokes Can Strike at Balance., in Health on the Net Foundation. 1993. 60. Nyberg L, Gustafson Y. Patient falls in stro ke rehabilitation. A challenge to rehabilitation strategies Stroke 1995;26(5):838-42. 61. Harris JE, Eng JJ, Marigold DS, Tokuno CD Louis CL. Relationship of balance and mobility to fall incidence in people with chronic stroke Phys Ther 2005;85(2):150-8. 62. Roberts L, Counsell C. Assessment of c linical outcomes in acute stroke trials Stroke 1998;29(5):986-91. 63. Kautz SA, Patten C. Interlimb influen ces on paretic leg f unction in poststroke hemiparesis J Neurophysiol 2005;93(5):2460-73. 64. Daly JJ, Sng K, Roenigk K, Fredrickson E, Dohring M. Intra-limb coordination deficit in stroke survivors and response to treatment Gait Posture 2007;25(3):412-8. 65. Hsu AL, Tang PF, Jan MH. Analysis of im pairments influencing gait velocity and asymmetry of hemiplegic patients after mild to moderate stroke Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2003;84(8):1185-93. 66. Mizrahi J, Susak Z, Heller L, Najenson T. Objective expression of gait improvement of hemiplegics during rehabilitation by time-distance parameters of the stride Med Biol Eng Comput 1982;20(5):628-34. 67. Perry J. Chapter 20 Stride analysis. In: Gait Analysis: Normal and Pathological Function. 1992. Editor: Perry J. Slack; Thorofare, New Jersey. 431. 68. Nakamura R, Handa T, Watanabe S, Morohashi I. Walki ng cycle after stroke Tohoku J Exp Med 1988;154(3):241-4. 69. Chen G, Patten C, Kothari DH, Zajac FE. Ga it differences between individuals with poststroke hemiparesis and non-disabl ed controls at matched speeds Gait Posture 2005;22(1):51-6.

PAGE 152

152 70. De Quervain IA, Simon SR, Leurgans S, Pease WS, McAllister D. Gait pattern in the early recovery period after stroke J Bone Joint Surg Am 1996;78(10):1506-14. 71. Dettmann MA, Linder MT, Sepic SB. Rela tionships among walking performance, postural stability, and f unctional assessments of the hemiplegic patient Am J Phys Med 1987;66(2):77-90. 72. Kerrigan DC. Introduction/Prologue on gait Anal ysis in the scien ce of rehabilitation Journal of Rehabilitation Research an d Development 1998;Monograph 002(xiii-xv). 73. Winter DA. Chapter 4: Kinetics. In: The Biomechanics and Motor Control of Human Gait: Normal, Elderly and Pathological 1991. Editor: Winter DA. Waterloo Biomechanics. 35. 74. Carlsoo S, Dahlof AG, Holm J. Kinetic analysis of the ga it in patients with hemiparesis and in patients with intermittent claudication Scand J Rehabil Med 1974;6(4):166-79. 75. Rogers MW, Hedman LD, Pai YC. Kinetic analysis of dynamic transitions in stance support accompanying voluntary leg flexi on movements in hemiparetic adults Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1993;74(1):19-25. 76. Bowden MG, Balasubramanian CK, Neptune RR, Kautz SA. Anterior-posterior ground reaction forces as a measure of paretic leg contribution in hemiparetic walking Stroke 2006;37(3):872-6. 77. Hausdorff JM. Gait variability: methods, modeling and meaning J Neuroengineering Rehabil 2005;2:19. 78. Buzzi UH, Stergiou N, Kurz MJ, Hageman PA Heidel J. Nonlinear dynamics indicates aging affects vari ability during gait Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon) 2003;18(5):435-43. 79. Grillner S. Control of locomotion in bipeds, tetrapods, and fish. In: Handbook of Physiology.1981.Editor: Brooks V. American Physiological Society; Bethesda, Maryland. 1179-236. 80. Taga G, Yamaguchi Y, Shimizu H. Self-o rganized control of bipedal locomotion by neural oscillators in unpredictable environment Biol Cybern 1991;65(3):147-59. 81. Abbas JJ, Chizeck HJ. Neural network cont rol of functional neur omuscular stimulation systems: computer simulation studies IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 1995;42(11):1117-27. 82. Baker G, Gollub J. Chaotic Dynamics. 1996: Cambridge University Press, New York. 83. Allgood K, Sauer T, Yorke J. Chaos: An Introduction to Dynamical Systems. 1997. Springer; New York.

PAGE 153

153 84. Li TY, Yorke JA. Period three implies chaos Am Math Mon 1975;82:985. 85. Dingwell JB, Cusumano JP, Sternad D, Cava nagh PR. Slower speeds in patients with diabetic neuropathy lead to improved local dynamic stability of continuous overground walking J Biomech 2000;33(10):1269-77. 86. Newell K, Corcos D. Variability and Motor Control 1993. Human Kinetics; Champaign, Illinois. 87. Thelen E, Smith L. A Dynamic Systems Approach to the Development of Cognition and Action. 1994. MIT Press; Cambridge, Maschuesttes. 359. 88. Riccio G. Information in m ovement variability about the qualitative dynamics of posture and orientation. In: Variability and Motor Control 1993. Editors: Newell K, Corcos D. Human Kinetics; Champaign, Illinois. 317. 89. Shinbrot T, Ott E, Grebogi C, Yorke JA. Us ing chaos to direct trajectories to targets Phys Rev Lett 1990;65(26):3215-18. 90. Latash M. There is no motor redundancy in human movements. There is motor abundance Motor Control 2000;4(3):259-60. 91. Grabiner PC, Biswas ST, Grabiner MD. Age -related changes in spatial and temporal gait variables. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2001;82(1):31-5. 92. Sekiya N, Nagasaki H, Ito H, Furuna T. Op timal walking in terms of variability in step length J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 1997;26(5):266-72. 93. Masani K, Kouzaki M, Fukunaga T. Va riability of ground reaction forces during treadmill walking J Appl Physiol 2002;92(5):1885-90. 94. Winter DA, Crago PE. Biomechanics and Neural Control of Posture and Movement. 2001. 2nd Edition. Editor: Winter JM, Crago PE. Spriger. 95. Owings TM, Grabiner MD. Variability of step kinematics in young and older adults Gait Posture 2004;20(1):26-9. 96. Maki B. Gait changes in older adults: predictors of falls or indicators of fear J Am Geriatr Soc 1997;45(11):1406. 97. Kesler A, Leibovich G, Herman T, Gruend linger L, Giladi N, Hausdorff JM. Shedding light on walking in the dark: th e effects of reduced lighting on the gait of older adults with a higher-level gait disorder and controls J Neuroengineering Rehabil 2005;2:27. 98. Brach JS, Berthold R, Craik R, VanSwear ingen JM, Newman AB. Gait variability in community-dwelling older adults J Am Geriatr Soc 2001;49(12):1646-50.

PAGE 154

154 99. Hausdorff JM, Purdon PL, Peng CK, Ladin Z, Wei JY, Goldberger AL. Fractal dynamics of human gait: stability of long-range corre lations in stride interval fluctuations. J Appl Physiol 1996;80(5):1448-57. 100. Goldberger AL, Amaral LA Hausdorff JM, Ivanov P, Peng CK, Stanley HE. Fractal dynamics in physiology: alterati ons with disease and aging Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2002;99(Suppl 1):2466-72. 101. Hausdorff JM, Rios DA, Edelberg HK. Gait va riability and fall risk in community-living older adults: a 1-year prospective study Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2001;82(8):1050-6. 102. Moe-Nilssen R, Aaslund MK, Helbostad JL. Reproducibility of variability. Proceedings in: International Conference for Gait and Posture Research. 2007. Burlington, Vermont. 103. Hausdorff JM, Edelberg HK, Mitchell SL, Goldberger AL, Wei JY. Increased gait unsteadiness in community-dwelling elderly fallers Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1997;78(3):278-83. 104. Brach JS, Berlin JE, VanSwearingen JM, Ne wman AB, Studenski SA. Too much or too little step width variability is associated with a fall history in older persons who walk at or near normal gait speed. J Neuroeng Rehabil 2005;2:21. 105. Herman T, Giladi N, Gurevich T, Hausdor ff JM. Gait instability and fractal dynamics of older adults with a "cauti ous" gait: why do certain older adults walk fearfully? Gait Posture 2005;21(2):178-85. 106. Hausdorff JM, Cudkowicz ME, Firtion R, Wei JY, Goldberger AL. Gait variability and basal ganglia disorders: stride -to-stride variations of gait cycle timing in Parkinson's disease and Huntington's disease Mov Disord 1998;13(3):428-37. 107. Schaafsma JD, Giladi N, Balash Y, Bartels AL, Gurevich T, Hausdorff JM. Gait dynamics in Parkinson's disease: relationship to Parkinsonian features, falls and response to levodopa J Neurol Sci 2003;212(1-2):47-53. 108. Gabell A, Nayak US. The effect of age on variability in gait J Gerontol 1984;39(6):6626. 109. Hausdorff JM, Doniger GM, Springer S, Y ogev G, Simon ES, Giladi N. A common cognitive profile in elderly fallers and in patients with Parkinson's disease: the prominence of impaired execu tive function and attention Exp Aging Res 2006;32(4):411-29. 110. Brach JS, Studenski S, Perera S, Vansw earingen JM, Newman AB. Stance time and step width variability have unique contri buting impairments in older persons Gait Posture 2008;27(3):431-9.

PAGE 155

155 111. Webster KE, Merory JR, Wittwer JE. Gait variability in community dwelling adults with Alzheimer disease Alzheimer Dis Assoc Disord 2006;20(1):37-40. 112. Owings TM, Grabiner MD. Step width variabil ity, but not step length variability or step time variability, discriminates gait of healthy young and older adults during treadmill locomotion J Biomech 2004;37(6):935-8. 113. Charlett A, Weller C, Purkiss AG, Dobbs SM Dobbs RJ. Breadth of base whilst walking: effect of ageing and parkinsonism Age Ageing 1998;27(1):49-54. 114. Bauby CE, Kuo AD. Active control of lateral balance in human walking J Biomech 2000;33(11):1433-40. 115. Ayyappa E. Normal human locomotion, Part 1:Basic concepts and terminology. J Prosthet Orthot 1997;9:10 -17. 116. Townsend MA. Dynamics and coordination of torso motions in human locomotion J Biomech 1981;14(11):727-38. 117. Townsend MA. Biped gait stabilization via foot placement J Biomech 1985;18(1):21-38. 118. Redfern MS, Schumann T. A mode l of foot placement during gait J Biomech 1994;27(11):1339-46. 119. Zijlstra W, Hof AL. Displacement of the pelv is during human walking: experimental data and model predictions Gait Posture 1997;6:249-62. 120. Drew T, Prentice S, Schepens B. Corti cal and brainstem control of locomotion. In: Brain Mechanisms for the Integra tion of Posture and Movement. 2004. Editors: Mori S, Stuart DG,Wiesendanger M. Elsevier; Amsterdam. 251-61. 121. Beloozerova IN, Sirota MG. The role of th e motor cortex in the control of vigour of locomotor movements in the cat J Physiol 1993;461:27-46. 122. Patla AE, Prentice SD. The role of active forces and intersegmental dynamics in the control of limb trajectory over obs tacles during locomotion in humans Exp Brain Res 1995;106(3):499-504. 123. Patla AE, Rietdyk S, Martin C, Prentice S. Locomotor Patterns of the Leading and the Trailing Limbs as Solid and Fragile Obstacles Are Stepped Over: Some Insights Into the Role of Vision During Locomotion J Mot Behav 1996;28(1):35-47. 124. Bizzi E, Tresch MC, Saltiel P, d'Avella A. New perspectives on spinal motor systems Nat Rev Neurosci 2000;1(2):101-8.

PAGE 156

156 125. Pearson KG, Collins DF. Reversal of the infl uence of group Ib afferents from plantaris on activity in medial gastrocnemius muscle during locomotor activity Journal of Neurophysiology 1993;70(3):1009-17. 126. Rossignol S. Neural control of stereotypic limb movements. In: Handbook of Physiology, Section 12. Exercise: Regulation and Integr ation of Multiple Systems. 1996. Editor: Sheperd J. American Physiological Society. 173-216. 127. Hurmuzlu Y, Basdogan C, Carollo JJ. Pres enting joint kinematics of human locomotion using phase plane portraits and Poincare maps J Biomech 1994;27(12):1495-9. 128. Winter DA. Foot trajectory in human gait : a precise and multifactorial motor control task Phys Ther 1992;72(1):45-53. 129. Lacquaniti F. Central repres entations of human limb movement as revealed by studies of drawing and handwriting Trends Neurosci 1989;12(8):287-91. 130. Hebb O. Organization of Behavior. 1949: Wiley; New York. 131. Winter DA, Patla AE, Frank JS, Walt SE. Bi omechanical walking pattern changes in the fit and healthy elderly Phys Ther 1990;70(6):340-7. 132. Patla AE. Strategies for dynamic stab ility during adaptive human locomotion IEEE Eng Med Biol Mag 2003;22(2):48-52. 133. Woollacott MH, Tang PF. Balance control during walking in the older adult: research and its implications Phys Ther 1997;77(6):646-60. 134. MacKinnon CD, Winter DA. Control of whol e body balance in the frontal plane during human walking. J Biomech 1993;26(6):633-44. 135. Pai YC, Patton J. Center of mass velocity -position predictions for balance control J Biomech 1997;30(4):347-54. 136. Patton JL, Pai Y, Lee WA. Evaluation of a m odel that determines th e stability limits of dynamic balance Gait Posture 1999;9(1):38-49. 137. Hof AL, van Bockel RM, Schoppen T, Postema K. Control of latera l balance in walking. Experimental findings in norma l subjects and above-knee amputees Gait Posture 2007;25(2):250-8. 138. Zajac FE, Neptune RR, Kautz SA. Biomechanics and muscle coordination of human walking. Part I: Introduction to concepts power transfer, dynamics and simulations. Gait and Posture 2002;16:215-32.

PAGE 157

157 139. Nene A, Mayagoitia R, Veltink P. Assessmen t of rectus femoris function during initial swing phase Gait Posture 1999;9(1):1-9. 140. Mochon S, McMahon TA. Ballistic walking. J Biomech 1980;13(1):49-57. 141. McGeer T. Passive dynamic walking The International Journal of Robotics Research 1990;9:62-82. 142. Basmajian JV. Electromyographic investig ation of spasticity and muscle spasm Physiotherapy 1976;62(10):319-23. 143. Crowninshield RD, Brand RA. A physiologically based criterion of muscle force prediction in locomotion J Biomech 1981;14(11):793-801. 144. DeVita P. The selection of a standard c onvention for analyzing gait data based on the analysis of relevant biomechanical factors. J Biomech 1994;27(4):501-8. 145. Piazza SJ, Delp SL. The influence of muscle s on knee flexion during the swing phase of gait Journal of Biomechanic s 1996;29(6):723-33. 146. Whittlesey SN, van Emmerik RE, Hamill J. The swing phase of human walking is not a passive movement Motor Control 2000;4(3):273-92. 147. Selles RW, Bussmann JB, Wagenaar RC, Stam HJ. Comparing predictiv e validity of four ballistic swing phase models of human walking J Biomech 2001;34(9):1171-7. 148. Neptune RR, Kautz SA, Zajac FE. Contributions of the individual ankl e plantar flexors to support, forward progression and swing initiation during walking J Biomech 2001;34(11):1387-98. 149. Meinders M, Gitter A, Czerniecki JM. The ro le of ankle plantar flexor muscle work during walking. Scand J Rehabil Med 1998;30(1):39-46. 150. Nakamura M, Mori M, Nishii J. Traject ory planning for a leg swing during human walking. In: 2004 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man and Cybernetics. 2004. 784. 151. Dietz V. Do human bipeds use quadrupedal coordination? Trends Neurosci 2002;25(9):462-7. 152. Kuan TS, Tsou JY, Su FC. Hemiplegic gait of stroke patients: the effect of using a cane Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1999;80(7):777-84. 153. Dodd KJ, Morris ME. Lateral pe lvic displacement during gai t: abnormalities after stroke and changes during the first month of rehabilitation Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2003;84(8):1200-5.

PAGE 158

158 154. De Bujanda E, Nadeau S, Bourbonnais D, Di ckstein R. Associations between lower limb impairments, locomotor capacities and kinema tic variables in the frontal plane during walking in adults with chronic stroke. J Rehabil Med 2003;35(6):259-64. 155. Gage JR. Surgical treatment of knee dysfunction in cerebral palsy Clin Orthop Relat Res 1990;253:45-54. 156. Lehmann JF, Condon SM, Price R, deLateur BJ. Gait abnormalities in hemiplegia: their correction by ankle-foot orthoses Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1987;68(11):763-71. 157. Kerrigan DC, Karvosky ME, Riley PO. Spastic paretic stiff-legged gait: joint kinetics Am J Phys Med Rehabil 2001;80(4):244-9. 158. Teixeira-Salmela LF, Nadeau S, McBride I, Olney SJ. Effects of muscle strengthening and physical conditioning training on tempor al, kinematic and kinetic variables during gait in chronic stroke survivors J Rehabil Med 2001;33(2):53-60. 159. Olney SJ, Griffin MP, Monga TN, McBride ID. Work and power in gait of stroke patients Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1991;72(5):309-14. 160. Mulroy S, Gronley J, Weiss W, Newsam C, Perry J. Use of cluster analysis for gait pattern classification of patie nts in the early and late r ecovery phases following stroke Gait Posture 2003;18(1):114-25. 161. Winter DA. Chapter 4: Kinetics. In: The Biomechanics and Motor Control of Human Gait: Normal, Elderly and Pathological 1991. Editor: Winter DA. Waterloo Biomechanics. 47. 162. Nadeau S, Gravel D, Arsenault AB, Bourbonna is D. Plantarflexor weakness as a limiting factor of gait speed in st roke subjects and the compen sating role of hip flexors Clin Biomech 1999;14(2):125-35. 163. Olney SJ, Griffin MP, McBride ID. Temporal, kinematic, and kinetic variables related to gait speed in subjects with he miplegia: a regression approach Phys Ther 1994;74(9):87285. 164. Mena D, Mansour JM, Simon SR. Analysis and synthesis of human swing leg motion during gait and its c linical applications J Biomech 1981;14(12):823-32. 165. Shemmell J, Johansson J, Portra V, Gottli eb GL, Thomas JS, Corcos DM. Control of interjoint coordination duri ng the swing phase of normal gait at different speeds J Neuroengineering Rehabil 2007;4:10. 166. Riley PO, Kerrigan DC. Torque action of twojoint muscles in the swing period of stifflegged gait: a forward dynamic model analysis J Biomech 1998;31(9):835-40.

PAGE 159

159 167. Zajac FE, Neptune RR, Kautz SA. Biomechanics and muscle coordination of human walking. Part II: Lessons from dynamical simulations and clinical implications Gait Posture 2003;17(1):1-17. 168. Zajac F, Gordon M. Determining muscle's force and action in multi-articular movement. Exerc Sport Sci Rev 1989;17:187-230. 169. Hill AV. The mechanics of active muscle Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 1953;141:104 -17. 170. Winter DA. Biomechanics and Motor Control of Human Movement. 1990. WileyInterscience; New York. 171. Andersson EA, Nilsson J, Thorstensson A. Intramuscular EMG from the hip flexor muscles during human locomotion Acta Physiologica Scan dinavica 1997;161:361-70. 172. Gottschall JS, Kram R. Energy cost and muscular activity required for propulsion during walking J Appl Physiol 2003;94(5):1766-72. 173. Goldberg SR, Ounpuu S, Delp SL. The importa nce of swing-phase in itial conditions in stiff-knee gait J Biomech 2003;36(8):1111-6. 174. Den Otter AR, Geurts AC, Mulder T, Duysens J. Abnormalities in the temporal patterning of lower extremity muscle activity in hemiparetic gait Gait Posture 2007;25(3):342-52. 175. Turnbull GI, Charteris J, Wall JC. A compar ison of the range of walking speeds between normal and hemiplegic subjects Scand J Rehabil Med 1995;27(3):175-82. 176. Titianova EB, Tarkka IM. Asymmetry in walking performance and postural sway in patients with chronic unilateral cerebral infarction J Rehabil Res Dev 1995;32(3):236-44. 177. Worthen LC, Kim CM, Kautz SA, Lew HL, Ki ratli BJ, Beaupre GS. Key characteristics of walking correlate with bone density in individuals with chronic stroke J Rehabil Res Dev 2005;42(6):761-8. 178. Brunnstrom S. Movement Therapy in Hemiplegia : A Neurophysiological Approach. 1970. Hagerstown: Harper and Row. 179. Bilney B, Morris M, Webster K. Concurre nt related validity of the GAITRite walkway system for quantification of the spatial and temporal parameters of gait Gait Posture 2003;17(1):68-74. 180. Perry J, Garrett M, Gronley JK, Mulroy SJ. Classification of walking handicap in the stroke population Stroke 1995;26(6):982-89.

PAGE 160

160 181. Studenski S, Perera S, Wallace D, Cha ndler JM, Duncan PW, Rooney E, Fox M, Guralnik JM. Physical performance measures in the clinical setting. J Am Geriatr Soc 2003;51(3):314-22. 182. Varraine E, Bonnard M, Pailhous J. Intenti onal on-line adaptation of stride length in human walking. Exp Brain Res 2000;130(2):248-57. 183. Anderson FC, Goldberg SR, Pandy MG, Delp SL. Contributions of muscle forces and toe-off kinematics to peak knee flexion during the swing phase of normal gait: an induced position analysis J Biomech 2004;37(5):731-7. 184. Zajac FE, Neptune RR, Kautz SA. Biomechanics and muscle coordination of human walking. Part II: Lessons from dynamical simulations and clinical applications Gait and Posture 2003;17:1-17. 185. Duncan PW, Propst M, Nelson SG. Reliabili ty of the Fugl-Meyer assessment of sensorimotor recovery following cerebrovascular accident. Phys Ther 1983;63(10):160610. 186. Kautz SA, Brown DA. Relationships between timing of muscle excitation and impaired motor performance during cyclical lower extr emity movement in post-stroke hemiplegia Brain 1998;121(Pt 3):515-26. 187. Jonsdottir J, Cattaneo D. Reliability and validity of the dynamic gait index in persons with chronic stroke Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2007;88(11):1410-5. 188. Shumway-Cook A, Baldwin M, Polissar NL, Gruber W. Predicting the probability for falls in community-dwelling older adults Phys Ther 1997;77(8):812-9. 189. Maki BE. Gait changes in older adults: pr edictors of falls or indicators of fear J Am Geriatr Soc 1997;45(3):313-20. 190. Niechwiej-Szwedoa E, Innessa E, Howeb J, Jaglala S, McIlroya W, Verrier M. Changes in gait variability during different challenges to mobility in patients with traumatic brain injury Gait Posture 2007;25(1):70-77. 191. Rosano C, Brach J, Studenski S, Longstret h WT, Jr., Newman AB. Gait variability is associated with subclinical brain vascular abnormalities in high-f unctioning older adults Neuroepidemiology 200 7;29(3-4):193-200. 192. Katz-Leurer M, Rotem H, Lewitus H, Kere n O, Meyer S. Relationship between balance abilities and gait characteristics in children with post-traumatic brain injury Brain Inj 2008;22(2):153-9.

PAGE 161

161 193. Brach JS, Studenski SA, Perera S, VanSw earingen JM, Newman AB Gait variab ility and the risk of incident mobility disabi lity in community-dwelling older adults J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 2007;62(9):983-8. 194. Balasubramanian CK, Bowden MG, Neptune RR, Kautz SA. Relationship between step length asymmetry and walking performance in subjects with chronic hemiparesis Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2007;88(1):43-9. 195. Frenkel-Toledo S, Giladi N, Peretz C, Herman T, Gruendl inger L, Hausdorff JM. Effect of gait speed on gait rhythmicity in Parkinson's disease: variability of stride time and swing time respond differently J Neuroeng Rehabil 2005;2:23. 196. Crenshaw SJ, Royer TD, Richards JG, H udson DJ. Gait variability in people with multiple sclerosis Mult Scler 2006;12(5):613-9. 197. Danion F, Varraine E, Bonnard M, Pailhous J. Stride variability in human gait: the effect of stride frequency and stride length Gait Posture 2003;18(1):69-77. 198. Chen G, Patten C, Kothari DH, Zajac FE. Ga it deviations associated with post-stroke hemiparesis: improvement during treadmill wa lking using weight support, speed, support stiffness, and handrail hold Gait Posture 2005;22(1):57-62. 199. Tyson SF. Trunk kinematics in hemiplegic gait and the effect of walking aids Clin Rehabil 1999;13(4):295-300. 200. de Leva P. Adjustments to Zatsiorsky-Seluyanov's segment inertia parameters J Biomech 1996;29(9):1223-30. 201. Hof AL, Gazendam MG, Sinke WE. The condition for dynamic stability J Biomech 2005;38(1):1-8. 202. Moraes R, Allard F, Patla AE. Validating de terminants for an alternate foot placement selection algorithm during human locomotion in cluttered terrain J Neurophysiol 2007;98(4):1928-40. 203. Mochon S, McMahon TA. Ballistic walking: an improved model. Mathematical Biosciences 1980;52:241-60. 204. Chen G, Patten C. Joint moment work during the stance-toswing transition in hemiparetic subjects J Biomech 2008;41(4):877-83. 205. Neptune RR, Zajac FE, Kautz SA. Muscle force redistributes segmental power for body progression during walking Gait Posture 2003;19(2):194-205. 206. Portney LG, Watkins MP. Foundations of Clinical Research : Applications to Practice. 1995. 2nd Edition.Prentice-Hall.

PAGE 162

162 207. Lamontagne A, Malouin F, Richards CL, Dumas F. Mechanisms of disturbed motor control in ankle weakness during gait after stroke Gait Posture 2002;15(3):244-55. 208. Hesse SAJ, M.T., Schreiner, C; Mauritz, K-H. Gait symmetry and functional walking performance in hemiparetic patients prior to and after a 4-week rehabilittaion program. Gait & Posture 1993;1:166-71. 209. Dewar ME, Judge G. Temporal asy mmetry as a gait quality indicator Med Biol Eng Comput 1980;18(5):689-93.

PAGE 163

163 BIOGRAPHICAL SKETCH Chitra Laks hmi K.Balasubramanian received her Bachelor in Phys ical Therapy from College of Allied Health Sciences, Manipal A cademy of Higher Education, Karnataka, India. She worked for one year imparting physical thera py to adults and children with disabilities in New Delhi, India. Her strong interest in an inte rdisciplinary approach to rehabilitation encouraged her to pursue the Rehabilitation Science Doctoral progra m at University of Florida. She was funded by the Alumni fellowship for four years of her graduate education and from an National Institutes of Health research grant for the final eight m onths of her doctoral education. Her research employed biomechanical measures to understand asym metrical nature of walking in persons who have had a stroke and she was guided under th e expert tutelage of Dr. Steve Kautz. In the near future, Chitra plans to use her doctoral education to actively pursue teaching and research in neurologically im paired populations. She is specifi cally interested in developing a scientific framework that will aid in designing efficient rehab ilitation strategies to improve walking function. In the long-term, she plans to re turn to India and aims to establish a strong foundation for rehabilitation education and relate d research and facilita te development of a common academic structure in rehabilitation.