<%BANNER%>

Laboring to Uphold the Image of Suburbia

Permanent Link: http://ufdc.ufl.edu/UFE0022246/00001

Material Information

Title: Laboring to Uphold the Image of Suburbia Representations of Deviant Sexual Desire in 'The Virgin Suicides' and 'Middlesex'
Physical Description: 1 online resource (88 p.)
Language: english
Publisher: University of Florida
Place of Publication: Gainesville, Fla.
Publication Date: 2008

Subjects

Subjects / Keywords: deviance, eugenides, middlesex, sexuality, suburb, suburbia, suicides, virgin
Women's Studies -- Dissertations, Academic -- UF
Genre: Women's Studies thesis, M.A.
bibliography   ( marcgt )
theses   ( marcgt )
government publication (state, provincial, terriorial, dependent)   ( marcgt )
born-digital   ( sobekcm )
Electronic Thesis or Dissertation

Notes

Abstract: This paper argues that Eugenides' novels employ instances of deviant sexuality to unmask the efforts of suburbanites to define their living spaces (against the city as the locus of filth) as stable and orderly models of the American Dream. Existing socio-historical scholarship about suburbia contends with a notion of the suburb as a haven for white, middle-class families. Two competing perspectives emerge out of this scholarship: the first critiques the conformist force of the homogeneous American suburb; the second revises the history of suburbia, complicating the picture by providing evidence of Black suburbanization and working-class suburbs. I conclude that while suburbs have historically housed differences of race and class, the collective imagined suburb includes only white middle-class families. This paper seeks to extend the critique of the revisionist scholars by introducing sexuality as a category of analysis and exploring representations of 'deviant' sexuality in suburban literature. My reading of Eugenides' novels suggests that implementing sexuality as a lens through which to interrogate suburban ideologies offers further insight into the ways in which suburbanites define themselves in opposition to the 'filth' (sexual and otherwise) that resides in the city. In The Virgin Suicides, Eugenides demonstrates the suburban impulse to suffocate the sexual desires of five white, middle-class sisters, resulting in their suicides. In Middlesex, he complicates his critique, showing how race and class differences dissolve behind a facade of normative heterosexual family structure, that is, until, evidence of deviance surfaces in the birth of an intersexed child. This intervention into suburban discourse will foreground the process by which individuals hold up for themselves the image of the American suburb and exert an enormous effort to achieve and maintain rightful membership in white, middle-class suburbia. This thesis speculates that further interdisciplinary scholarship about suburbia must be done in order to attend to the dissonance between the image of a white-washed homogeneous suburb and its more complicated experiential counterpart. I conclude that sexuality, as a category of analysis, connects with race and class in order to emphasize the inherent heterosexuality that frames the image of suburbia. An analysis of sexuality offers a more complete picture of the ways in which individuals labor to conceal their various deviations from suburban norms.
General Note: In the series University of Florida Digital Collections.
General Note: Includes vita.
Bibliography: Includes bibliographical references.
Source of Description: Description based on online resource; title from PDF title page.
Source of Description: This bibliographic record is available under the Creative Commons CC0 public domain dedication. The University of Florida Libraries, as creator of this bibliographic record, has waived all rights to it worldwide under copyright law, including all related and neighboring rights, to the extent allowed by law.
Thesis: Thesis (M.A.)--University of Florida, 2008.
Local: Adviser: Travis, Patricia A.

Record Information

Source Institution: UFRGP
Rights Management: Applicable rights reserved.
Classification: lcc - LD1780 2008
System ID: UFE0022246:00001

Permanent Link: http://ufdc.ufl.edu/UFE0022246/00001

Material Information

Title: Laboring to Uphold the Image of Suburbia Representations of Deviant Sexual Desire in 'The Virgin Suicides' and 'Middlesex'
Physical Description: 1 online resource (88 p.)
Language: english
Publisher: University of Florida
Place of Publication: Gainesville, Fla.
Publication Date: 2008

Subjects

Subjects / Keywords: deviance, eugenides, middlesex, sexuality, suburb, suburbia, suicides, virgin
Women's Studies -- Dissertations, Academic -- UF
Genre: Women's Studies thesis, M.A.
bibliography   ( marcgt )
theses   ( marcgt )
government publication (state, provincial, terriorial, dependent)   ( marcgt )
born-digital   ( sobekcm )
Electronic Thesis or Dissertation

Notes

Abstract: This paper argues that Eugenides' novels employ instances of deviant sexuality to unmask the efforts of suburbanites to define their living spaces (against the city as the locus of filth) as stable and orderly models of the American Dream. Existing socio-historical scholarship about suburbia contends with a notion of the suburb as a haven for white, middle-class families. Two competing perspectives emerge out of this scholarship: the first critiques the conformist force of the homogeneous American suburb; the second revises the history of suburbia, complicating the picture by providing evidence of Black suburbanization and working-class suburbs. I conclude that while suburbs have historically housed differences of race and class, the collective imagined suburb includes only white middle-class families. This paper seeks to extend the critique of the revisionist scholars by introducing sexuality as a category of analysis and exploring representations of 'deviant' sexuality in suburban literature. My reading of Eugenides' novels suggests that implementing sexuality as a lens through which to interrogate suburban ideologies offers further insight into the ways in which suburbanites define themselves in opposition to the 'filth' (sexual and otherwise) that resides in the city. In The Virgin Suicides, Eugenides demonstrates the suburban impulse to suffocate the sexual desires of five white, middle-class sisters, resulting in their suicides. In Middlesex, he complicates his critique, showing how race and class differences dissolve behind a facade of normative heterosexual family structure, that is, until, evidence of deviance surfaces in the birth of an intersexed child. This intervention into suburban discourse will foreground the process by which individuals hold up for themselves the image of the American suburb and exert an enormous effort to achieve and maintain rightful membership in white, middle-class suburbia. This thesis speculates that further interdisciplinary scholarship about suburbia must be done in order to attend to the dissonance between the image of a white-washed homogeneous suburb and its more complicated experiential counterpart. I conclude that sexuality, as a category of analysis, connects with race and class in order to emphasize the inherent heterosexuality that frames the image of suburbia. An analysis of sexuality offers a more complete picture of the ways in which individuals labor to conceal their various deviations from suburban norms.
General Note: In the series University of Florida Digital Collections.
General Note: Includes vita.
Bibliography: Includes bibliographical references.
Source of Description: Description based on online resource; title from PDF title page.
Source of Description: This bibliographic record is available under the Creative Commons CC0 public domain dedication. The University of Florida Libraries, as creator of this bibliographic record, has waived all rights to it worldwide under copyright law, including all related and neighboring rights, to the extent allowed by law.
Thesis: Thesis (M.A.)--University of Florida, 2008.
Local: Adviser: Travis, Patricia A.

Record Information

Source Institution: UFRGP
Rights Management: Applicable rights reserved.
Classification: lcc - LD1780 2008
System ID: UFE0022246:00001


This item has the following downloads:


Full Text
xml version 1.0 encoding UTF-8
REPORT xmlns http:www.fcla.edudlsmddaitss xmlns:xsi http:www.w3.org2001XMLSchema-instance xsi:schemaLocation http:www.fcla.edudlsmddaitssdaitssReport.xsd
INGEST IEID E20101203_AAAAEG INGEST_TIME 2010-12-03T23:26:34Z PACKAGE UFE0022246_00001
AGREEMENT_INFO ACCOUNT UF PROJECT UFDC
FILES
FILE SIZE 25271604 DFID F20101203_AABSOC ORIGIN DEPOSITOR PATH szymanski_m_Page_59.tif GLOBAL false PRESERVATION BIT MESSAGE_DIGEST ALGORITHM MD5
1830ef26fac3f4e9a3f7cffcfce2f39a
SHA-1
8a5fb415ba7d67776bbd05981bdddfa00f89389c
7294 F20101203_AABSJE szymanski_m_Page_53thm.jpg
7f65e541ddf45227f0338e1b739847de
6ffcffcb5922da057cf6b7a18a17ebc55535be89
80348 F20101203_AABSOD szymanski_m_Page_23.jpg
0b384afa6a38b0098c7947042788d1e7
f65bd882b0a7e011f973e7af58b5554070374b1d
1051980 F20101203_AABSJF szymanski_m_Page_52.jp2
3cd0a6a48ef26e62f731c4892e23c0d1
8a1d81e95f368ec7e262ffdb72e4c16f305effe0
27316 F20101203_AABSTA szymanski_m_Page_12.QC.jpg
24a6c2775640d097f6a6d7bd5edf47be
6cc3f4b446e1f538467feb9c47e6b1c27ca371bf
26303 F20101203_AABSOE szymanski_m_Page_58.QC.jpg
d608bd084eae8cd5f88e25a010f43f68
ce37b835a5c2ffbcf9a3fd20aec645764366e9aa
14079 F20101203_AABSJG szymanski_m_Page_13.jpg
cd4849750c894e77f65c245662c4ea00
d8977fa82a024c74293b2ec8ad7091e5c032d4d7
26362 F20101203_AABSTB szymanski_m_Page_14.QC.jpg
8769a97e1a3182416acbf13c7318be94
16844cede8dee7dc9559b9cefbf0378c6e031af6
27516 F20101203_AABSJH szymanski_m_Page_43.QC.jpg
31cce38829628c9211919f94023a265b
0eeb232590c70047f00b3e8755b509c0fc48345b
7408 F20101203_AABSTC szymanski_m_Page_15thm.jpg
35be4d117d7d9c023e32ee2d16a6a981
79a695fb0ed32f17b9d82d7eaf3ffb3d04ccdf77
1051968 F20101203_AABSOF szymanski_m_Page_42.jp2
db7aec171947bf6fc1292596e43c7ed3
04453b4f83ddec26d5dc2900e8884d7c7b42e116
7592 F20101203_AABSJI szymanski_m_Page_60thm.jpg
40f74921e2eb163fd789558353a97fbe
46e2027f574befb98e697a8e69abfbf576b11a48
7069 F20101203_AABSTD szymanski_m_Page_17thm.jpg
25c8f2a4d9403a05f8ee2438b608df25
e63debaed086ce1f5494a6267b1042ae006486c5
86217 F20101203_AABSOG szymanski_m_Page_68.jpg
c2632c19a684ecb2f5cfe1bd79cd86fe
3676ebe00fc51f837cf96d7f20d6e32164a97d9d
7454 F20101203_AABSJJ szymanski_m_Page_71thm.jpg
ef7f06a61987c5e80efecad460f0d442
c120ad4ef0ef49acfff836bc1ad940cfcc1cc30b
28191 F20101203_AABSTE szymanski_m_Page_18.QC.jpg
e0e8a51aaa7409240dccbae6344e7141
960125e9cdfd5af98658aa814fb80a13c704b962
F20101203_AABSOH szymanski_m_Page_34.tif
e62e4dc7907bfeaf6a9583fe52d1565a
51a7e287b8d5dd8679656dc6e8d9e9f847c81284
84274 F20101203_AABSJK szymanski_m_Page_52.jpg
3b251c881e422c8c88e97dedf41bad5e
e8954c517f880a46b44748973f3a282eb2d13703
7517 F20101203_AABSTF szymanski_m_Page_18thm.jpg
c941dc480795d2ff0541935b58c7c647
ea4b7d16d70b596504ab94da79602d995d5328a1
1051986 F20101203_AABSOI szymanski_m_Page_62.jp2
d67627ba311d7b3181a3a18d3ceddf2b
63d5aec2adc1e6c299552b2c699875c45bc1f9a1
F20101203_AABSJL szymanski_m_Page_38.tif
8ab4e01d0a3d36a9eb909929d1221c2a
ac2ed4c87f35af2d5bd9cb89eabc785b4cb3d929
25922 F20101203_AABSTG szymanski_m_Page_20.QC.jpg
95722f578e9998cc303b2c9574aedc2a
b0cf12e575bd07d6a2a3be9dd3b2e53c254597fa
273739 F20101203_AABSOJ szymanski_m_Page_01.jp2
29f7ea1dfb054e8c60b71a6894daa007
f5aacc1652041433684c0a463e3c4136a7d76ba9
79457 F20101203_AABSJM szymanski_m_Page_28.jpg
60e9108daf2c95c70419cf574d6a2dc9
9cc1b9165a0466c1ce1cd259057fe34a966a1636
27550 F20101203_AABSTH szymanski_m_Page_22.QC.jpg
f54a8e76e4ae20302edf157bb0bddbad
bce6901075d53606f0a589be73082e5a18802e8d
98046 F20101203_AABSOK UFE0022246_00001.xml FULL
660fb102e7fe41f887f4710db5cd5ba1
36cd8cdda4f16420cbb7bdca60d28ef6371a77d6
26468 F20101203_AABSJN szymanski_m_Page_16.QC.jpg
f04eb4b93fa4addab2c93f7243809d5b
48ddf840f9d3d9246907958751033cccd8d85103
7311 F20101203_AABSTI szymanski_m_Page_22thm.jpg
2600fb2966514e50b4fbcb9e072db783
d037eda1e9ecf66db9a0825798ff87d1de5b6fae
89360 F20101203_AABSJO szymanski_m_Page_32.jpg
0734cb8b654b3aefd14782b02ee3092d
7686d413bfbe5e017dae2d5377bff4a18fc82ef8
24825 F20101203_AABSTJ szymanski_m_Page_23.QC.jpg
878e516dfcfa890ddacf685f9f464ae8
aefe262c60cb33c61cd013b1dcf35841e0750c88
F20101203_AABSJP szymanski_m_Page_33.tif
e67c670c9edba6593131a2c5770b15d5
c18f60dbbad7323f8aaec5e49c64bad2256eb849
7190 F20101203_AABSES szymanski_m_Page_16thm.jpg
16ccd7eb91a07d1db82399a8dbcefea9
75cfcf718f4bcc5c0851067cc201f614c61f12d2
26614 F20101203_AABSON szymanski_m_Page_01.jpg
614316289cd19307b42b5106a2dc8485
71a13a2ce722a0f0f5f0b28dc0032e53dd6808ce
1051975 F20101203_AABSJQ szymanski_m_Page_67.jp2
010cddac1a2af674d12f19a7d52b630d
4bb61da825cb3931604713ef5be0fe37f8043b81
7222 F20101203_AABSTK szymanski_m_Page_23thm.jpg
73f322054e8ed1940f2f32d6e60073a8
091d6e55e1b31efe4019c08fc1d702836776df7e
27869 F20101203_AABSET szymanski_m_Page_40.QC.jpg
e6212d4ff5bbbf59f9825146ae5d1d16
e11094684bb64dbf42ff5d2706234147ba6f80d1
72548 F20101203_AABSOO szymanski_m_Page_04.jpg
3af775f3ff4abd3449d339339c6703af
106c9f7a1defa9076b23a4c8d1459276abf356c7
F20101203_AABSJR szymanski_m_Page_48.tif
5177b8a806ccea61d340c11dd656c9ee
1548b9b6b7f2f1f9c10e1b87fa8a72ccb9d124da
26682 F20101203_AABSTL szymanski_m_Page_24.QC.jpg
5b8e7a2e8dc5178dcc4336284dba7a6d
46755e444389155a5186661132870a3764629be0
1051979 F20101203_AABSEU szymanski_m_Page_57.jp2
e73906f1a4b5e1ac410412e3c910634f
da4b44e03e6d8e770f50e34710078eebf1771685
84240 F20101203_AABSOP szymanski_m_Page_07.jpg
7bc3405f64d2410b544e23285773f555
0d061622cf1e133fa9077835f2c52dae65a39196
7057 F20101203_AABSJS szymanski_m_Page_11thm.jpg
ae292a4967b411d0a3cf8eca067889a3
da5e1aea55b259c68504a1c27db211beb6b7691a
7143 F20101203_AABSTM szymanski_m_Page_24thm.jpg
b87110fec2c8a6eef88e48b9e4d038b1
96c61e2ceada9c86049ba5b013d5ac2032c1d456
F20101203_AABSEV szymanski_m_Page_19.tif
b66bacdf0700138fee2f9adf639d49ba
844db473eaac03abbac7eafae99261457b7ac4a9
93292 F20101203_AABSOQ szymanski_m_Page_08.jpg
789ce86ba5cb0644951c1b0d6d4679a5
d1c2d00c8865c8aa46153e7cb733f35079f5296f
26774 F20101203_AABSJT szymanski_m_Page_29.QC.jpg
72f172a3e4e2abe12c7f3fa6d871d48d
ea8836e65d56355e9469923939e9c5d8bdd3f773
26495 F20101203_AABSTN szymanski_m_Page_25.QC.jpg
ade58f018a29e4e05fa4b3a1258336ac
b3621d194d1430d9d2b4affc7875da005e3269b4
88191 F20101203_AABSEW szymanski_m_Page_87.jpg
b92781be78772b352ef9d03ad1483f0a
674be9de6e903f8ae0c99a420acdcc1d2641ae90
F20101203_AABSJU szymanski_m_Page_21.tif
f6b1a9c9c77b72942e965475116ab390
16de9581bae7a9a23be7d452dea5e0996d1f38d0
7120 F20101203_AABSTO szymanski_m_Page_25thm.jpg
eacf018849c68ec40b8613c08fe2ee82
ad15981ec78ed8786d9b5d5b13bcbe007dd94642
86792 F20101203_AABSEX szymanski_m_Page_75.jpg
bed0d7bf00b7701557994d8e4349ea56
e13fc41587a92d5f03780fe8462e20a0a7290d38
88130 F20101203_AABSOR szymanski_m_Page_10.jpg
1764689f88d6afac2ba92b9a84aeb84e
b45b510868de5faaf938f8e73c55497f893c4875
7100 F20101203_AABSJV szymanski_m_Page_80thm.jpg
e60aec09f2bf0f510a01f76659774149
96e8b0272104ca2012f9347ee37a9080d737c914
27611 F20101203_AABSTP szymanski_m_Page_26.QC.jpg
94ac92fb393a6e80d3c9c95ba6e8df72
e4295136273ee631bd1c614b1e8e9acc1edf4689
6757 F20101203_AABSEY szymanski_m_Page_66thm.jpg
fb10d25719f6391d592c1592c14e02a3
d5614925be8d5242b6ac0a0f6c5c68f3cef1741c
83397 F20101203_AABSOS szymanski_m_Page_12.jpg
c39724f60ef8e3965d73e35b16939f3d
f36d46b9327a674f9824353258d9c791774bc420
25410 F20101203_AABSJW szymanski_m_Page_73.QC.jpg
71b717e13b64e7f6c4e48fbb9fb72bf5
22dd6184e096059627986ca44e136be7400a3e15
7188 F20101203_AABSTQ szymanski_m_Page_28thm.jpg
dc4ac3ce283ac16b973d065cbef96f35
0fcbaad3cc37590351b9d6737843a077e5692930
27645 F20101203_AABSEZ szymanski_m_Page_09.QC.jpg
f3fdd45c672112d1fa64739ad914a794
9411eb29d0667412ce3a19a696d6d30e315b2d74
86758 F20101203_AABSOT szymanski_m_Page_15.jpg
a75f532b723130fd7035a3d6f22f2f64
aa88d52f0488b80f0a205c67db5711aad4c92108
47363 F20101203_AABSJX szymanski_m_Page_06.jpg
2f915213a356a06843dccfccc1d15538
e6efe6cead052d51647e777acbd11cd3dd733ece
7110 F20101203_AABSTR szymanski_m_Page_29thm.jpg
c547dd9438168426d3f39b34ee33c67c
454b2fa67fab05fbbd2c76695e3b3c7cfcc6740b
83137 F20101203_AABSOU szymanski_m_Page_20.jpg
65d825806ef97f0d2fc9fe3ec902726a
bf2c6c90ac7e48cf2716f041f80a28dc8151f589
26270 F20101203_AABSJY szymanski_m_Page_72.QC.jpg
d9f1663b6b94846bbaa329a76ab1375b
49783e153e90cdfe3b96693fecbf4099112fb04d
26522 F20101203_AABSTS szymanski_m_Page_31.QC.jpg
721adef86840ac7376d4fb5366fb4248
1646357c84758c4135a1883b0f3511482cc73e75
83262 F20101203_AABSOV szymanski_m_Page_21.jpg
969192ad91e0033cd33f59c17a7af4c7
e9ab6c20b61889f6b9f6445590cd77952c9b4d52
88105 F20101203_AABSHA szymanski_m_Page_65.jpg
2aa3b2e81ba9b9138e3d1f60c1b02a50
c15691b0936298945db699d244c46443a2a1b4d3
86939 F20101203_AABSJZ szymanski_m_Page_70.jpg
873f424b4dfac0ee27ab8bbf39f638e0
e4c8393350d5ed0d9ef14defa27c0d2297314bce
7076 F20101203_AABSTT szymanski_m_Page_31thm.jpg
905e1d86fd4c31974c3dba75f55df641
58a41b11dae8eb4b73e61b4064ca8178925cf18c
86611 F20101203_AABSOW szymanski_m_Page_22.jpg
f975e52dbc679410c430ce4467e84109
c4f96c8c3848d49d741e31a5b8359124f2c6de5e
6918 F20101203_AABSHB szymanski_m_Page_33thm.jpg
4f75c0bfd72e9617d6b7e453f1b70673
9ad6b2e5fdf187ae32f4fe3d1c64e69c689aca10
27496 F20101203_AABSTU szymanski_m_Page_32.QC.jpg
2b782485005823f64d5b59677d4cf07f
3871e0a5405e4eb7c0eebd35f7105c60eefdb7e2
87731 F20101203_AABSOX szymanski_m_Page_30.jpg
f596a40b99fc2bced5f20a4cbd350801
477845155e60a783123cfc6e19d3043e649efea7
87728 F20101203_AABSHC szymanski_m_Page_71.jpg
f27db217907aee63db8062aa474eea3e
9cf1709ba31295544f2586287fb9a2046a67beb1
27531 F20101203_AABSTV szymanski_m_Page_36.QC.jpg
14dc6675ae5870841edce1efb267cca4
605a8cf72b9160fa17abd0db54868c254994ea22
84740 F20101203_AABSMA szymanski_m_Page_16.jpg
2cbdb5d5aacfe457fb500e06bded927e
5c51e65f6bbbf0a3d8b37b1c169ed937b00a3857
83313 F20101203_AABSOY szymanski_m_Page_31.jpg
37cab89665c9b6f6eca32a3c28f47fbf
ff38cf7bbaac4dfcde507fc5ba3eabc916e97f2f
1051924 F20101203_AABSHD szymanski_m_Page_74.jp2
a0e91b5dd51bec8a3deb68a8e8e68e56
ed3d6e975dc4874e376d68b6a4a85d8e1a1e08cb
7238 F20101203_AABSTW szymanski_m_Page_36thm.jpg
10467d5e3d2b5d508b63be11601ffc59
9ee587ae30c3fa23fb2fa4b4d75de32d18a77e5d
84107 F20101203_AABSMB szymanski_m_Page_72.jpg
36d7d049da534653257be9e81c32c45a
d896ec72cb2c085dae036e097a71dd216224f174
78563 F20101203_AABSOZ szymanski_m_Page_33.jpg
a91ae5aa046c24f39876c8628b1c1f6b
90e38dafdc444a8b04486baa1d47bff785ebaca6
27321 F20101203_AABSTX szymanski_m_Page_38.QC.jpg
dd188ef7f3663ad9648540dc3fd57f4e
318710063d722de057166634cab11948c548a5c6
7307 F20101203_AABSMC szymanski_m_Page_30thm.jpg
33eeb1b526e4059387c74590c2886778
6a8eca3810fbf28477d8581d737f387336a8555d
F20101203_AABSHE szymanski_m_Page_43.tif
a2d1058b30db237363a461d85d79ff6b
2fb31282728e87701aad1169fc1342e32ee1ea10
1051938 F20101203_AABSRA szymanski_m_Page_75.jp2
6a9717734abfb5e4dae5a7de48363748
6f2c87503aff89732ab5cd4d83df02acb0fadfe2
7371 F20101203_AABSTY szymanski_m_Page_38thm.jpg
8771ab8b4eaec6f3b3388ee3e87ef3ec
c46476574d6dddd548987eea391ca82bffc10a27
1051960 F20101203_AABSHF szymanski_m_Page_59.jp2
b524119618ef0b25aec0b2c8f9d21e7a
3f23fb3cfa549ecb08f676dacae35cad0e8fe137
452959 F20101203_AABSRB szymanski_m_Page_78.jp2
acf0a4f6d05b93ef9d2f0d5ed4e59155
9b239529407ffe2a00c8454b5702178ac49584a4
7042 F20101203_AABSTZ szymanski_m_Page_41thm.jpg
fc9a4195c043930210f176ff18557ae0
6deb384527a4f34ca2c3308c3faebfbb3a969aa8
80200 F20101203_AABSMD szymanski_m_Page_39.jpg
ef45ff970fcc3a0fd724e86fc869fbe0
1ca4d8c8ea87dc5e3e1d27200512da3c8e874439
F20101203_AABSHG szymanski_m_Page_30.tif
66db228ec47a0942f0cf500e302dcf11
6c96b2480f197b7f1c5e7c2088cfbc2114af97ab
1051961 F20101203_AABSRC szymanski_m_Page_79.jp2
24360a956833ebb51cb8815fdf7f4ffb
8b2d661db40ccb94299081a72e1d614d53071ba4
83905 F20101203_AABSME szymanski_m_Page_37.jpg
1ee6a8c07be274183d83637dddb4cc75
175d82f26b2a162be16d1d42816f22e8cf17009b
1051974 F20101203_AABSHH szymanski_m_Page_61.jp2
a2ae0ba796800d0f4f596419f9365170
13564048b914c27d9764345eb480a6656cfda3c0
1051976 F20101203_AABSRD szymanski_m_Page_80.jp2
9cc2cfe6af3e5ccf5fafe126c4656cb3
1122bc30e4940c9f239d6acaf4368c32c358df37
26053 F20101203_AABSMF szymanski_m_Page_21.QC.jpg
6f39f4107c98df49ff2d9a00ecbdd305
e492158bff4b06c76de7fae5cacbb082e755870a
27859 F20101203_AABSHI szymanski_m_Page_27.QC.jpg
65bc74dc85bc4e29d5787bda57439e76
e45ee7114d888754e2ef8c142fb18ac14256b2ff
1051983 F20101203_AABSRE szymanski_m_Page_82.jp2
4f6c3beee7f006b337a75112d46151fe
394e584ef29bc1991a1d09f127f7a5d83942e39b
7273 F20101203_AABSMG szymanski_m_Page_20thm.jpg
13c7a72d39dd2ba946b4122a9160c097
c55e0e79e6c8d6045755f9d33047c3aa6497a34d
11402 F20101203_AABSHJ szymanski_m_Page_78.QC.jpg
9336c273f445b0efa10216dceef28d23
e816071a820506ca7ed10db888ab0a3815ace134
F20101203_AABSRF szymanski_m_Page_83.jp2
216dae983fd0200038c07b7e2ce82d45
c322c2a2ab7887a733fee1dede3f4c1e30682871
F20101203_AABSMH szymanski_m_Page_70.tif
d36a93f9989b92a9180bc6c5665b351c
f46c7a6ea2addb10b0481925e278bda25677c204
7313 F20101203_AABSHK szymanski_m_Page_72thm.jpg
0289f5ff895c7abe25d88fc84e80177e
1a05c6b3e83d119dd67658036a5812f748f8af30
1051977 F20101203_AABSRG szymanski_m_Page_87.jp2
7e0f698b53078747fca41f920f8f2562
65f2ce7108cf096c95e5f6248ebaef0685213935
26984 F20101203_AABSMI szymanski_m_Page_51.QC.jpg
6a2ff67cd9996c0022ecf9512635ba9b
c50992dd551426674500a0a8f20e3b27d96cbff1
F20101203_AABSHL szymanski_m_Page_74.tif
066305fdff9b5f77dfe27bf79777e537
87b7a81204585b363848fa4051566b4b9f7fcbb9
F20101203_AABSRH szymanski_m_Page_04.tif
44bae37de8061e00a2e00a27fe6369d9
5c391060348615c5ef568a30505b75bafd66d07b
1051944 F20101203_AABSMJ szymanski_m_Page_32.jp2
0f4bccec2c70dc2986ae47e7abd2b77c
a50df348de71f2e8c61e1fc90813e90f5e6368f2
84867 F20101203_AABSHM szymanski_m_Page_82.jpg
8510159dbaafee317e54dbe1b185cb45
6c4a1e7ac4bf4c07bc3c512fb004d7fa38cd424a
4064 F20101203_AABSMK szymanski_m_Page_03thm.jpg
998f0be063363d602c0500135fbaf990
134276814facaacf4dc60963b198f32870876c01
86156 F20101203_AABSHN szymanski_m_Page_46.jpg
178c2cfe2a85a875a9080f85a002da56
b20e6143a36b353f31922705b6159fa5d0a95244
F20101203_AABSRI szymanski_m_Page_05.tif
2a761ac583c9ce36af51f9816975a5af
1060add93d2f1859a114bdb7d5ed9f9d4337012d
F20101203_AABSML szymanski_m_Page_10.tif
03d8ad5db3db8a0d53f7547db4bda5e2
03fe38e498e503f38964b24a63fc004d6644d1e3
86331 F20101203_AABSHO szymanski_m_Page_77.jpg
e0ac63d72272f9324972217eae0fe031
1d11560742388314da87f389ada9cfd228a28963
F20101203_AABSRJ szymanski_m_Page_06.tif
1bda008b91c329f1189e09350c91260b
6a05ea941112fb55f5ddd260603016485ccefa37
27648 F20101203_AABSMM szymanski_m_Page_30.QC.jpg
88710f30aec838bbca8027e8e149b2e6
5261b396ab9fb2a978c22d3970ccf9d9e6e784b9
85882 F20101203_AABSHP szymanski_m_Page_49.jpg
13e411048cceb6ddf1fa2b7ac9c7ad0b
dbf98ad999c21d535de531604574d69dbd16f1df
F20101203_AABSRK szymanski_m_Page_07.tif
3272bfb1b31f8e8ce415f7e66570ab15
263ad32268fdbc95ef12148116570856841190df
88682 F20101203_AABSMN szymanski_m_Page_57.jpg
0d1704de7d95d98416ae518c16a4b4d5
61eb0015e1edc3ffdbefd07e67c9a1fa92b21816
1051962 F20101203_AABSHQ szymanski_m_Page_27.jp2
9b2580985a56ce1ae31471485d4dd1d5
7b50a261ab7f833d9815188f2a4ba10db0de35f7
F20101203_AABSRL szymanski_m_Page_08.tif
e82534d36085b613a5ff925f67b1f2bc
7ff8a239fca4900c473e8aee2c74b4aa406a5d6f
F20101203_AABSMO szymanski_m_Page_81.tif
7c26c417fd76111165b4c37b6fb582c0
f22cbac3250473f75bb5417437aa3742dfa1e0c1
88753 F20101203_AABSHR szymanski_m_Page_63.jpg
3cb2643352119ed2338cc0ec65d32583
dafb8f2ca50c98cdf5899afe80662c48211ec21f
F20101203_AABSRM szymanski_m_Page_12.tif
9011832d12e596e5f11b68fe602bc1cb
5a7386b52e5619e348e23c6405d8b25c927b4a3d
F20101203_AABSMP szymanski_m_Page_62.tif
e2abe425612f18928da6584d9d421202
aadc7ed2902dfd105bbe5c073a74d3376b946f96
F20101203_AABSHS szymanski_m_Page_76.jp2
fb5e45efa6ceef69af5e06c8d0be83b1
f3d28379b4173b4067975fbe98d37d1626b44eeb
F20101203_AABSMQ szymanski_m_Page_18.tif
3def07561f19b0ffcb3062eafde1a01e
dd49667924d9d3b4d67073871a207ac16400e46f
10173 F20101203_AABSHT szymanski_m_Page_02.jpg
bf82b83a1c199c9c68a17da258c18dd8
2d2b2fd8e638c4cc9df4eee354de2d04d98cc8d6
F20101203_AABSRN szymanski_m_Page_13.tif
748f61984d536d6d5041e5e7d44d8bf7
621e885546b5d8148e5f50e7c55c9622d83a8ece
27888 F20101203_AABSMR szymanski_m_Page_10.QC.jpg
a1adec8b3179d77e75c9b795333fc3b0
0a4fb123946a0a2a4dffcff983ba77e5cb0dd899
F20101203_AABSHU szymanski_m_Page_75.tif
04e5c35bd513388f3788a09767e6a74f
494bc4f9609296d79d104a80a8d5d6ba31d16989
F20101203_AABSRO szymanski_m_Page_14.tif
2ff7d21613d7c41c56155e2fba84f228
e115355b95e94eafc76d6db845db5102d93517b6
13618 F20101203_AABSMS szymanski_m_Page_03.QC.jpg
c6320d8a9c580c4439f74e3d50969ae1
2b561c12d6446c9563806faea933ef91bb3411de
7912 F20101203_AABSHV szymanski_m_Page_01.QC.jpg
f64fe0c1cf37340b956d1b35537e618e
44bf65df9c530a296af20406b44ff596bec41281
F20101203_AABSRP szymanski_m_Page_16.tif
eda2bdafa58f4b76bd2de128fc808e52
106575ccde8c8d8ebc55d58bc0bb72d5690e2dc0
78780 F20101203_AABSMT szymanski_m_Page_66.jpg
edb721a9489e935dcbca7a4d26370d62
4d545c7c15024a81294ca1397d2b5be61e447590
1051981 F20101203_AABSHW szymanski_m_Page_44.jp2
0e389083101311c94fe2bd29020b49ef
95e828c8ad1912f388199af953962da8c3be2c01
F20101203_AABSRQ szymanski_m_Page_20.tif
29b4130bb358afe62b969f5ff5637d27
ce2b2edbc9d3a4aeb5a9da9ee3a6e4611c2ba60f
1051925 F20101203_AABSMU szymanski_m_Page_45.jp2
f0e61cb16b27e5c57513b2dea515ed72
21c0ea2a3305c70dd5213238fc90cea8c986d5e6
F20101203_AABSHX szymanski_m_Page_04.jp2
93f52155ab53852e41d60adc56c7ab0d
21d3f779526915360e9d48f4610c12bbb5aee56f
F20101203_AABSRR szymanski_m_Page_23.tif
87e07865e5ca75e2622e8040f38eb224
3f41678ddf4cfbf0beb70c6dcff147090709deb9
1051913 F20101203_AABSMV szymanski_m_Page_38.jp2
687ecdd371ce55ba116c564124bd56f0
f693fadee47d4953ade1ce40d1dc5deece474541
F20101203_AABSHY szymanski_m_Page_37.tif
2336d8bbea7fd963057d60a299ef1e1a
8052b0afbe92de1f06d6c564509803dc7204fc76
F20101203_AABSRS szymanski_m_Page_27.tif
e83bd27fcbe89778cb043a9d844cd79e
25759d099d7da20d054d4dbb23801b10ae6d4a98
27461 F20101203_AABSMW szymanski_m_Page_46.QC.jpg
cbcd45af0e1eae9a5c22e15678c9c55b
1496bdb60fb8d4a88478d966607d6cd31a470978
85217 F20101203_AABSFA szymanski_m_Page_29.jpg
cd0c5e62b7d3375e9b5b9e3f16b095a8
2c8201dd2a8bc66ce93f9145cb48d66a84be41c0
87143 F20101203_AABSHZ szymanski_m_Page_48.jpg
0b36ab85f8b56d277bfd3425a69feecd
0cdcc719e6e1fa01bfc38d3ec3c1864c70c45260
F20101203_AABSRT szymanski_m_Page_36.tif
913973828c343ee14419ef2d8743288b
665a40e58963e10bf106362ab201fc54d394bea1
82908 F20101203_AABSMX szymanski_m_Page_41.jpg
9e906979cca0b3300e29fe8bf43f89b9
6216989b55771f8520203fc5ed005c0d347669a9
F20101203_AABSFB szymanski_m_Page_78.tif
bda91df7081f88831a41b7172a387abf
99ab425f7dda1b0afd8eba13cbb7cf51af865d74
F20101203_AABSRU szymanski_m_Page_42.tif
404bc25a556e47f65b18fb924e5c3328
3b250f5cd0048c9d1e9d5812515d896fdc7f2eca
90583 F20101203_AABSKA szymanski_m_Page_27.jpg
aa54a398d48117f98aa6e9b9f055642e
4acfec3cb6f0eb5ced5fec9ba0be89677e909075
1051928 F20101203_AABSMY szymanski_m_Page_09.jp2
067bb88c710de41ae1951cb14eddf4bd
b84bfa1bc46e9c1c8bea09d5c1e6a6e7c45b7ba1
25366 F20101203_AABSFC szymanski_m_Page_33.QC.jpg
d8a19738dc57707f9034da7649a12f71
b016eb7b08f9dedd7b3447f180a96dd78515bbcf
F20101203_AABSRV szymanski_m_Page_46.tif
df9eb9ef0d12889d5bfa8e93ea415444
4fc2099479911d63cec9e4da7e417151ca9ba226
F20101203_AABSMZ szymanski_m_Page_31.tif
e092a16c76cb4f6681474a4710e58db2
3eff85ef5f60ea0945226414e92e1defdbe37269
F20101203_AABSFD szymanski_m_Page_01.tif
a6e5669dc0302a2765403b0c5acc5318
ad5d7b06b68690e663b50d640c83622f53862868
F20101203_AABSRW szymanski_m_Page_47.tif
85de9a0eb4405d3af99bd834d46b8aef
d6ec20c8fa35d77b9ab89355d70ab9e072d111a0
F20101203_AABSFE szymanski_m_Page_17.tif
e8b73f51b5a6413fd235cd1d9e5e7d38
887ae5b2ca81ef7664c2853d2cc4b2900b7b5a76
F20101203_AABSRX szymanski_m_Page_50.tif
fa9dbe4b55f81bf1ac4c7aed345101f3
a3e7b81123e321a95d71159f438bb3cbe9f9f686
F20101203_AABSKB szymanski_m_Page_86.tif
e34c30e129378a8ce6551484cc7c6b9f
74c63f22ac9b70bef5b8d712544d18b82468385c
27520 F20101203_AABSFF szymanski_m_Page_48.QC.jpg
7c07cafce5d33d1890b3251113ce21dd
fda1a6b3278b32ddb9a54092d01179c238118750
88696 F20101203_AABSPA szymanski_m_Page_34.jpg
7ffde504a69df4fc8effc8cf0cc9f777
26e65fb885ee693edfa80dc46601327a5c859d9e
F20101203_AABSRY szymanski_m_Page_52.tif
e1003de8c5918378837d8ee0e80eb5bf
db10d2fbf1f31c77894ad09825b7a9dbb96188ec
F20101203_AABSKC szymanski_m_Page_35.tif
d10f3fc9320e0017188d7e0c202047cc
4405715b94c5949de0fc175f3bb63f78edaefbee
F20101203_AABSFG szymanski_m_Page_03.tif
d0027e78f5957745fa6bc6a976c66c7e
86647f0fd9fc73ae8daa4721313d8c8ec6a12526
87980 F20101203_AABSPB szymanski_m_Page_35.jpg
ec00497dee5cd7f2baf3357a8032ec18
b30c56df5fab9c2b07d6485640dd0de2633baeb1
F20101203_AABSRZ szymanski_m_Page_54.tif
066c32158e60c109f747f5064f551603
8f1338cbb905be45e6a368531f39120ebc42e83d
7472 F20101203_AABSKD szymanski_m_Page_37thm.jpg
221d123b7d79286308ecc24ed784837f
4c9311857959b2a240f0fcf4580dcfb32b2b9f7b
86643 F20101203_AABSFH szymanski_m_Page_38.jpg
fff9c4447e2344867df14f285ab3a127
157a8c663300311b6c5b6bb045d790204396fa05
86218 F20101203_AABSPC szymanski_m_Page_36.jpg
f62d900ab2f7c8e741b4e79a382cb8e6
c530a9f512f883cb0e59c8f3bb51ebf5a8903110
F20101203_AABSKE szymanski_m_Page_45.tif
8407318402ec90e87e59645efbd6a3c8
6b8ca82a3751b319fc38b0a24f250018e56e3575
28902 F20101203_AABSUA szymanski_m_Page_42.QC.jpg
7e4a4c59215aa24c90c3671f9027a6a1
8b01a72ad4ca3452f0df0d90d72d1fb2ff74f0e8
1051956 F20101203_AABSFI szymanski_m_Page_71.jp2
ad299251b6c735a46b8a173f078f57a0
f31f9b1da311329ab91c4e498f3f9cf3b2fccb2b
87798 F20101203_AABSPD szymanski_m_Page_40.jpg
857c5835aaf861838acee9ca17f462a2
db990ba881ca2a1cb6d9d1d16bdd25ce2965a247
F20101203_AABSKF szymanski_m_Page_39.tif
6929c3919c1408a88f9c3caa4a912537
b98e04488d2150ef9e3dae19ce67e663ba01cbea
7789 F20101203_AABSUB szymanski_m_Page_42thm.jpg
4efd5752e39e971290f55c52516cd97e
3a039b242c54b5d2530cf21a2a63c8150fbb7563
F20101203_AABSFJ szymanski_m_Page_67.tif
56355ba0a0313f94682a77f39b7ff94c
a7d030a97063e9c9c185f9a725c39f65a041a1bb
86856 F20101203_AABSPE szymanski_m_Page_43.jpg
31dadbb44e06ae0be849242ac27b498a
c709ca7ee4120e98a855be2edd4f55cbea3c3e70
7330 F20101203_AABSKG szymanski_m_Page_26thm.jpg
80a92bfe6f073512d7db07a1ca0d4ae3
7a604884d3935b217f663a876efd18202d1391ae
7429 F20101203_AABSUC szymanski_m_Page_43thm.jpg
77643d5f78547ee726c97afa6085933c
6b40575ec24309d5c4e00b6765b502010417e93d
7550 F20101203_AABSFK szymanski_m_Page_12thm.jpg
22f7eba555dd4a2089f7ed15f39bc8d3
190b79cd03b0d25baf12202937837f7dbefcb27d
86129 F20101203_AABSPF szymanski_m_Page_45.jpg
6aa1f1997755c9744ef93d3d8641ce39
e1ab7f7bee4cbbdaff31b69c67e9276254e98006
F20101203_AABSKH szymanski_m_Page_63.tif
8aa81220356a3a2c6fddf47c60bebe16
87eb57bfdc60ce10c49f7fb20757e1738837ac50
26964 F20101203_AABSUD szymanski_m_Page_45.QC.jpg
a9cf6e3360da72982315d9122c568f05
2c3edf48ab4ff9446ea5ac08df01f3d326794d0f
26223 F20101203_AABSFL szymanski_m_Page_17.QC.jpg
8edd2cbc34aab201031d56bc44691f69
54b596cc92bc272b15f3166fbdc8b853d6fe10aa
F20101203_AABSKI szymanski_m_Page_57.tif
a29e6c541ab0687ff0ca2fddb3833a21
8a6a9e5bd0ed9f3a421de1d5396b1eecc21acf4e
7413 F20101203_AABSUE szymanski_m_Page_45thm.jpg
524f6a1c711adcdf85fe36dc4248d671
abda8e320e9e55469d3fe5064d681bbe2b625b47
1051970 F20101203_AABSFM szymanski_m_Page_29.jp2
f96af938d26facef56c6f74c4e2d78e2
d3e4854ddb4979e95204eaab248cceb0ffd8c87a
83036 F20101203_AABSPG szymanski_m_Page_50.jpg
c48da2b5e0a72f23b86035670cf05dab
6de7de92bd629bfade28ee933bcb7db6c8376265
27834 F20101203_AABSKJ szymanski_m_Page_60.QC.jpg
3e580ace905f7a312ea150b32a258bfc
278a5b193a67a8c58d33a1427fd69aa1a3bf4f55
F20101203_AABSUF szymanski_m_Page_46thm.jpg
de2275937c6c73d4073826f59cf891f3
a9d5074d2a3f14bbf0fec111be9a722dd3ca135c
1051972 F20101203_AABSFN szymanski_m_Page_07.jp2
b194db17dcd9738889011cdfe123f7ef
c67e62ec804d4f44b60d515283ac4e19baddb8a2
87270 F20101203_AABSPH szymanski_m_Page_53.jpg
57986155980c282459ef581e4ddc1f34
1eb52b1ce422303802fcde94cee49335ddcf340f
F20101203_AABSKK szymanski_m_Page_65.tif
476b798f7ab2c65b45393ba33fdc4c88
3b17a315843a6d9f99d14127575eeb84712f6f54
27308 F20101203_AABSUG szymanski_m_Page_47.QC.jpg
66dda3bd2339ab26b7dd603f76be94d9
5a8b420e5d3633281ead70c4fee51066e9f29f33
83961 F20101203_AABSFO szymanski_m_Page_25.jpg
d581a23a3a7aa92c0c103c695c58b2f5
0446b14a1fef09609e63e128d9363d28508bd0a9
20337 F20101203_AABSPI szymanski_m_Page_54.jpg
c642d1bbd5136f91b7e6c3f3abbcd471
d3fb8081248bfb13b1de309fcd948a8a534539b8
84317 F20101203_AABSKL szymanski_m_Page_17.jpg
88b961117b54e1e05181f53c650a31e3
8920cb3985ba857033c883d906050551e9d87825
7353 F20101203_AABSUH szymanski_m_Page_48thm.jpg
cc2d3392abb3bc458d924e9ee888eea8
90db02d95e0d203bad9fc31d20d4e5c02ec775f5
F20101203_AABSFP szymanski_m_Page_68.tif
8c8c0404d14d33b2772e9a5ecb5d1e3a
32cdc1cad96d638ad965ac9a298b6bf67ee69dae
97259 F20101203_AABSPJ szymanski_m_Page_56.jpg
e5e1805f25dfd04082ef535b1d102001
96b97f08560ea22b5952a437e44294f661c18ce7
F20101203_AABSKM szymanski_m_Page_53.tif
64d37bc966411b2b5a9fff22176b51c0
2a0bd68cdc5f5e86515c7ce95bffa290fa0a40b0
26853 F20101203_AABSUI szymanski_m_Page_49.QC.jpg
b2fa911690c273ead3443d8b4186c89d
da40db098a5d6b51a2177899ca77eb38ef4ee8ed
1717 F20101203_AABSFQ szymanski_m_Page_13thm.jpg
4675af7673285add82c64e724013a4a2
32c398d15348195152b10735b0f748ebbe2dbd7e
83529 F20101203_AABSPK szymanski_m_Page_58.jpg
a323238edf40dde64df176075b1a3c77
ab0ce51f41d757ac9cb287ad80c0faa3bae9ded8
F20101203_AABSKN szymanski_m_Page_55.tif
7a278b24472b55f18869c666188ea452
7d40fd8d79b58b8e298f175f874b8cb34b5209c1
7323 F20101203_AABSUJ szymanski_m_Page_49thm.jpg
23e51aedde25c229898c538bb1c136a7
c6f2d82cf15ad0c4be969b6ca35f00180e917f1e
F20101203_AABSFR szymanski_m_Page_68thm.jpg
7aa0b1884fd39bff65fa6eb0308c7602
63f574cadfe10de6c6bd825ee75417f731b031ee
87550 F20101203_AABSPL szymanski_m_Page_60.jpg
fedd8b96a644b5b5e73be24bac433aa6
65d59d89d13f1ae4a394863e204283ec7475de58
6862 F20101203_AABSKO szymanski_m_Page_87thm.jpg
71431a2633924ef25c88e120d60d8423
82ae96cbd5ac79186bcfdaf7c092df8f8623ce10
25703 F20101203_AABSUK szymanski_m_Page_50.QC.jpg
120e1737a3dd86390ba7539b07e8611a
8c9990fe5d5dc360f24d51cc8898ebfd8ca29402
1051978 F20101203_AABSFS szymanski_m_Page_81.jp2
6f1d30708edafd057adcffa5b90eb18a
316b74b97931e8a50807043b9128bd7910b60884
87460 F20101203_AABSPM szymanski_m_Page_62.jpg
aaaa2ae2f5b83296acd2222d74fcf1fe
aa8f1eff14f4f3facf5118bec14c499baa2e1f57
7612 F20101203_AABSKP szymanski_m_Page_57thm.jpg
669475d7c236f0de577992df4250f4c6
ce296fafa77145e2f7ccc8a665d194a35b487cd9
88157 F20101203_AABSFT szymanski_m_Page_69.jpg
08fedcf87f1c294cf13f42c61a1085c9
44cd8c843b243a415690ff528b0d8604578d38f9
85852 F20101203_AABSPN szymanski_m_Page_64.jpg
0e36f4dafe5cce8cebe9063ede3301b2
f31addfbf08603f78bd81b8c555d25837dba007c
44079 F20101203_AABSKQ szymanski_m_Page_03.jpg
936e93ae507aa5e88a0da860338006b2
a79e9cd639b69ecbcff89ee6ab0a7f92afa5d26a
7159 F20101203_AABSUL szymanski_m_Page_50thm.jpg
e59a44c761dff410223b0441c3b85107
dc5fbd688e63fd3ca194d80968d3ee94453c67e1
28408 F20101203_AABSFU szymanski_m_Page_02.jp2
0fa561e513576dd4c06acb1a7094cbe9
80434f6929aeef24749289d8e7aa16139bd8f795
79735 F20101203_AABSPO szymanski_m_Page_73.jpg
7db97b1a64067c84c998edc1b964cf04
50826062ff6198b2bd41edf3f32dfc368687e6af
F20101203_AABSKR szymanski_m_Page_37.jp2
edd5b311f20beb36d0b69733be155908
357d369c56ff7bc625e3fbb644c5ff9e7fc5431a
7090 F20101203_AABSUM szymanski_m_Page_51thm.jpg
43fca7dbb425588451a541c56d54b16d
01b81466f041ad411a8bdd90f732b9601c9f7c45
F20101203_AABSFV szymanski_m_Page_22.tif
62ff3508aabf07afa191c81aa2294097
13adcb1c4c7aa5ac7fbd6085aae0a9d0185d410a
84897 F20101203_AABSPP szymanski_m_Page_76.jpg
d7d02c9536362ece90c529cbf58bc2c4
aaa155670d03bc2fe7650ecc7422524a69b53a89
F20101203_AABSKS szymanski_m_Page_49.tif
a9a8b934cb86cfd959fe6de93a778ae4
078ddb595b00f6090742175d98f1a990a93e9b33
26771 F20101203_AABSUN szymanski_m_Page_52.QC.jpg
deef12953ff7343e4a4d2ef045c9208a
426276dcbfc5b41d8e63a79e8c2609e55a2abe4d
27815 F20101203_AABSFW szymanski_m_Page_61.QC.jpg
708b52403eba7252311a6001a966070e
1e8c1af1a8007ecb583ed7bb893c16da2996e112
36074 F20101203_AABSPQ szymanski_m_Page_78.jpg
e62aa70c913428eac22555dfe99d146f
5a79dcf64e65f125b3340308dd889dd72d089d0f
F20101203_AABSKT szymanski_m_Page_28.jp2
4bef984b46a4edeca3e5c5e466107cbb
e4dd842f0dcf3f8b2620fb57fedf37a5149d3ae2
6627 F20101203_AABSUO szymanski_m_Page_54.QC.jpg
7e9ff662bc1aeff0b89c6d22c002a55a
4abf19747a58866869b8f6e6fa055abb60c6db9e
1389 F20101203_AABSFX szymanski_m_Page_02thm.jpg
c20ed88cdad4bee8d2aeca228bcd3ce6
a4e0b64473af6dc61025dcd1e326a7cc1a59866b
83212 F20101203_AABSPR szymanski_m_Page_79.jpg
92537f17d7fde1733c7655e9cb691695
ca7bf5e7921f3a6933e15b1206305949eb4e7221
F20101203_AABSKU szymanski_m_Page_66.tif
2e4e09a4d504236fe347994152fddc9a
60c4c39609839947ea59ae6bf5255f34f2548c07
7527 F20101203_AABSUP szymanski_m_Page_55thm.jpg
be01c48945d6ebe2447c07d725b7b45b
a49f06b6e5cf60110f5ddfa900cddee573863ebe
1051973 F20101203_AABSFY szymanski_m_Page_58.jp2
aa1432b34cd2a9d5e2d914c8e3fd426f
517f6d0907e55e71550b40fe662180914152e7f8
85808 F20101203_AABSPS szymanski_m_Page_81.jpg
1f1e3699cff5112094c330cdd8d10312
3e1e5680fe46ccda67785bd0edc651804e33f981
25209 F20101203_AABSKV szymanski_m_Page_28.QC.jpg
89b4d0ec1a6d38c23b03ec1a65a449a6
276e8ce994978f54e921c036356ccc013db9621d
7690 F20101203_AABSUQ szymanski_m_Page_56thm.jpg
f12138a1217d8aa4ed2e26375c46c818
ae63e35a5d9523eba44d19a25d1203013a3e4a07
7102 F20101203_AABSFZ szymanski_m_Page_86thm.jpg
e38ad571e469e2d3c8d291f29e6323df
4f255d0d15848c4cf04da16b073d410d58588758
81952 F20101203_AABSPT szymanski_m_Page_83.jpg
fa3caa81ccb6f3cf54f5413352e9301d
6b16e71d2c32fc5ea1acb42779274c036f2b6d07
7309 F20101203_AABSKW szymanski_m_Page_81thm.jpg
7d6962c47dc0224c5850d19f81798597
88554c46161bc636f276c9c19492c1323904c423
28388 F20101203_AABSUR szymanski_m_Page_57.QC.jpg
8c7791a3bb4e5db8540b82f6bea77c90
5df82d1ba74b358cc6fb85437788c03dd977fa35
50830 F20101203_AABSPU szymanski_m_Page_84.jpg
757a28c27a9f41591d3a04c40fde42f2
79e1fb499e27ee4a0a219318fc1ecd148299d091
F20101203_AABSKX szymanski_m_Page_25.tif
cab93bcbe525acdae47fc5a2c4704239
b4de86e3a81a534a6c16e40e2537164443e82f95
7257 F20101203_AABSUS szymanski_m_Page_58thm.jpg
44ec49bd3e7f072175a585ff3a9951d4
42919f1e6f9bc21c9a4ff56ffb72bdcc5c1b16a2
85561 F20101203_AABSPV szymanski_m_Page_86.jpg
e45c2bee951eca78a95c3b7094ae2278
66a0fd13d74e9155fcf25d61ab9ecb141ed9fc0a
F20101203_AABSKY szymanski_m_Page_56.tif
517cdd9dc641fbb02efdc932b136a5e2
f29199b02e769bfa6c75b2885d38b486485636a2
28171 F20101203_AABSUT szymanski_m_Page_59.QC.jpg
ed7d71dd754cc7bd01359ae02d0f24d7
17e5438fd6937dc557d3c2f52af1024954ef664e
560632 F20101203_AABSPW szymanski_m_Page_03.jp2
d22bdd12fda551c61e18482d18bdd7ac
a086f2b2b22054435fc89191bac60c343d4f34b7
4607 F20101203_AABSIA szymanski_m_Page_84thm.jpg
a7215e38a4e49458916e4aa14181abd2
96973a2ee97ed53ac0c208cf4a8a5ab9f949b261
664317 F20101203_AABSKZ szymanski_m_Page_84.jp2
d3e8524808fef2de9a1e4c24b2c5696f
f87688ea28468e0e695cb6298e972a44fb2debd2
7439 F20101203_AABSUU szymanski_m_Page_61thm.jpg
5cb3a2c5a2d582ff4042394c3b4a9cbe
1db966d74e302c0199cf929f8caec2a897a7f1f4
F20101203_AABSPX szymanski_m_Page_05.jp2
2c603ffc64b6af4f35c1e65a396de823
a0a8b1a021a085d65f1eb511468f74fbdc67772c
1051940 F20101203_AABSIB szymanski_m_Page_20.jp2
ec9aef884a853605d3c9a1aa8ea3f7c0
abd351abc87c5965b9459d80a7cbbdcc3a13c3ce
27522 F20101203_AABSUV szymanski_m_Page_62.QC.jpg
d65ae7dfb5cb88f00c1ef844c111a129
57899d804e468096f15930c0d9146eb508258b2d
1051963 F20101203_AABSPY szymanski_m_Page_08.jp2
928bcc14870b3f8ce176da4521c3b3fb
510678afb72af02a005eda8a3d55f39bfecde28e
F20101203_AABSIC szymanski_m_Page_09.tif
53b436b819ec0e3f6b946135bd109740
f459e5b44e1c2e531bd2126d8f35ee6cbd1dd26b
F20101203_AABSNA szymanski_m_Page_73.jp2
b6af56b60663a58804696cbaa12a2866
327627e1e85ad4b023a336b5cc3b205f09f8eec8
F20101203_AABSUW szymanski_m_Page_62thm.jpg
33d82c35bf111eb44ada4af217dc29a5
600c5b020bb37431b87ed2cbfae2d7d1c195b6b0
96827 F20101203_AABSPZ szymanski_m_Page_13.jp2
7c7a1ce68889392eca15cf484b4870ba
a5929add84c351117e9414ecc844108b1c100a48
159409 F20101203_AABSID szymanski_m_Page_88.jp2
6923122e83d42ef51149670306cec63b
07e1747dbea7a7058a5f86e67f46c9f7943c2be0
7557 F20101203_AABSNB szymanski_m_Page_19thm.jpg
c48fdbf838e0d395233657a76fd8bc48
08ff3f115b5665f6e70de9f424679d8f00d7d8a7
28149 F20101203_AABSUX szymanski_m_Page_63.QC.jpg
7e500a9d613dc56a07e0c2ac74c86a80
83f31f9c481c97f780a30392c56130ca9e8bb9d7
87833 F20101203_AABSIE szymanski_m_Page_67.jpg
858fd0044f80aff01d7db096aba4d918
7be67d00c715a1077c720711ca54f4898e278978
1051971 F20101203_AABSNC szymanski_m_Page_31.jp2
eb7a1aa8102e48b7cec6d98b12f9f742
7470c42049cc19d799c8dd88c24f43d7746408e9
7584 F20101203_AABSUY szymanski_m_Page_63thm.jpg
2e5a29a1908968d9f046c570878d5597
54a1c71c522ace6edaca314c7d916cded9e88867
1051930 F20101203_AABSIF szymanski_m_Page_85.jp2
3bd18c66d62e68a1d48c1849a7101a29
ef8d213e54801ed91241356097b0095c2e557f3e
F20101203_AABSSA szymanski_m_Page_58.tif
01a19554f73ce1bfc5e07a3e3b62e3f3
ce4de3b0e7d3ab62ee8c3ef57195f834cb75001e
F20101203_AABSND szymanski_m_Page_18.jpg
83e825ade66d3972e1693eaad0287340
402e8c4153079be7ec4ca9fd0c52b2a3ed71180d
7236 F20101203_AABSUZ szymanski_m_Page_64thm.jpg
f6b842ff505fd3e1946267ba96f09b51
7d7c2bc16a2e6eaea2091ce4a7ead4909bff06ec
25259 F20101203_AABSIG szymanski_m_Page_39.QC.jpg
c780a8cb27e9aed9fe1db5e26be475c2
d1660afe38fef218aab37adf03d349819cb68a05
F20101203_AABSSB szymanski_m_Page_64.tif
d4a0cada9938cd3d255c7221127f2caa
066e69a313a3b323de92da6ff55a1bf222b40681
7424 F20101203_AABSIH szymanski_m_Page_47thm.jpg
2772757c570e50fda831125540c15fb6
b274e9e6896e1cd130c10b90526bd9756182407c
F20101203_AABSSC szymanski_m_Page_69.tif
9b877151422f719dd16e43df5d6b0f95
476426b2f8679b79b59b605c1a8390b57b5a0aaa
7391 F20101203_AABSNE szymanski_m_Page_27thm.jpg
0b8b34f76aea6ef7dc4896374fe5a434
29c75f47151ca0d18d1a9136e058c76a98ef4fea
F20101203_AABSII szymanski_m_Page_12.jp2
db95b3aa52df1df6c4f9e2bca4c6dd68
5029f90c3b8c6ddcac23a21f9efa620cd306b4d6
F20101203_AABSSD szymanski_m_Page_71.tif
17099a7fa0286146b77109206b4ba1c2
6d70f3965286a2c751d30a91ff62721d2e488ae9
F20101203_AABSNF szymanski_m_Page_60.tif
50403fbd5c7c73ee1f7e8b043e1a46e2
07f4f0b16d6617d06f71a2f65bbd5e00d178c67a
7073 F20101203_AABSIJ szymanski_m_Page_14thm.jpg
b35d84e76c69e2a7a8dfa166c2625a12
8e2490ea13a62176607e10406daf1b0d4985ea8e
F20101203_AABSSE szymanski_m_Page_72.tif
34d0c10420bab16faa683479cd1b4b22
d45177a426cf5c141107c3f45c1333b20fe90718
24990 F20101203_AABSNG szymanski_m_Page_85.QC.jpg
c80d32e4e840423e6c58a8068f97cb9e
2fb6219ed1a27ce06377c256c02abdbd4141cc71
F20101203_AABSIK szymanski_m_Page_61.tif
7e4d056d21657bd0904a007b7188a46b
9119dce9b4c88dfe8e8c1e5ba55f0c2ea9bab0ee
F20101203_AABSSF szymanski_m_Page_73.tif
fb52969ee97ef3a1719d224bfa12e14a
068c7757dace4ea3b7f8789975184689851f338a
1051954 F20101203_AABSNH szymanski_m_Page_64.jp2
c1e0be943a2f1a3503f41a90594d0184
241c778663e1b1408d035d57f239c9775e283778
27521 F20101203_AABSIL szymanski_m_Page_74.QC.jpg
b0fa51d83aa1efd438fb58172b8eb8d4
a0a8d3035346903a1ad1e14d74072b855151c77e
F20101203_AABSSG szymanski_m_Page_77.tif
b99440feb3ac088ac0a206a782014011
47c6323d0643fcf1bb0a17c333cb950616787bcd
81683 F20101203_AABSNI szymanski_m_Page_80.jpg
dc52bf0b77df37822575668b65c95885
b7e0bcbf057351a44623d598a677fc48218974c2
7561 F20101203_AABSIM szymanski_m_Page_35thm.jpg
3cc51103586991e27876a2e7691e2eb4
50b06261e07d226df1900bda128fa035fa7ef466
F20101203_AABSSH szymanski_m_Page_79.tif
e3387c6b668b4049a45bbb8159dc0e05
7cb220dacaba1d9bed6d8cd6c38187be79f8ac27
F20101203_AABSNJ szymanski_m_Page_53.jp2
7c1184d3ac8a1dbe5bca4351c70c9bae
06295facf7b6a60ef7ad85b18c575b2ed5da48e2
25650 F20101203_AABSIN szymanski_m_Page_41.QC.jpg
b84ffaeb880a5628352a4df47be9c4c4
577ba6ec58ce8f6c22ae4f4517370ad3082327b5
F20101203_AABSSI szymanski_m_Page_80.tif
079d9bf6f55a74dec0408c337bc45860
72c12fb8d0935fb64d20ecbf523a4aa7688b39e4
2090 F20101203_AABSNK szymanski_m_Page_88thm.jpg
ca8b6d3120a847db624e03becc4b2014
1dab11d82dd36ad51aa91e07afc13fa30df775fb
F20101203_AABSIO szymanski_m_Page_77thm.jpg
6d68940c570941324262a4993b17e415
ed7ede0359dda565211426c435917f87ff698fb3
88899 F20101203_AABSNL szymanski_m_Page_55.jpg
c4fd188fd90eb164dd04b651dee7e49a
4b43278b4a86f2c9e7427eddfdde09f9fa56d64f
27255 F20101203_AABSIP szymanski_m_Page_77.QC.jpg
9eacb50e2662b6a187113545ddede696
055b859ff15497eb33a0d87a1fbd64d417b00c3a
F20101203_AABSSJ szymanski_m_Page_83.tif
57b4d43fdc3f68a7309242001fd6e0d6
9ce7e42182c762123d64fc56a1e78f8e6e69791e
7209 F20101203_AABSNM szymanski_m_Page_74thm.jpg
2a71d4daed24c3735889474fa90a4884
40e194858249e7fdee2d15f5c9d60f20c4fceb8e
20741 F20101203_AABSIQ szymanski_m_Page_04.QC.jpg
77dfd0057be806990f595b865d017abb
7ee98e8a7801d0b24f30086f9403a67432ccb167
F20101203_AABSSK szymanski_m_Page_84.tif
473308115a3f5f0141903a86158154e3
5de82d0e46680d2348d88edddad90ec79c9b2af4
1051945 F20101203_AABSNN szymanski_m_Page_36.jp2
b8fb4995a9d3366bc71ca455dcab66e6
85365b21820a4eb280af7e6b379dd1af27ca9acf
F20101203_AABSIR szymanski_m_Page_40.tif
07f172009f84187e564fa8c2fa4b7336
3f05e2c9fad2b7e2d5bcb0d643f24b877af61de5
F20101203_AABSSL szymanski_m_Page_85.tif
b46c21feb4a7eef517ec819890e412bf
11aa8286aadd18f57fc4842e644c88b8c6629907
86704 F20101203_AABSNO szymanski_m_Page_44.jpg
ea42dcbe6bdc5df1709093fa1e2af3a6
815c3c4f13d699122b8462dc02de736f99a7b622
84973 F20101203_AABSIS szymanski_m_Page_47.jpg
35348fc0e1000a1430265c65a1f3eab4
50fd0cf7190eb88b1129a8a04d4dcbec2d647725
F20101203_AABSSM szymanski_m_Page_88.tif
fda2dc7f2f9801ef4dcaa3755987d6a7
5eb19ea09874e6e2ee0e70a57dcd2d6268cae779
29195 F20101203_AABSNP szymanski_m_Page_56.QC.jpg
dad87540ccd2b0f29ceec5bc50c2b5d2
5f4472f29aa61b2fc1b7f5d949c6df886e9bdbe7
F20101203_AABSIT szymanski_m_Page_32.tif
a871ac20e7acf039926d0558a0dde2c2
ca437172ba53adc1b4482380e9389e2fe562c4b0
218176 F20101203_AABSSN szymanski_m.pdf
c5c07d2ba8149545e8c53172fe05a7ae
55cc4efcaff43c4a9092c423428171a13ab63d1c
88027 F20101203_AABSNQ szymanski_m_Page_19.jpg
fb7ecf9170bfd7e5eae91fcee48f5e9b
22f10bc66f3833ab1f132eb93e7fb0392eb92c9f
7618 F20101203_AABSIU szymanski_m_Page_40thm.jpg
6cea3feeaef366002cd27b209f1780d0
0ceedcd3b2fe0bcce02e7db904b7be2469439604
2380 F20101203_AABSSO szymanski_m_Page_01thm.jpg
9cc0dea9b4b4dcd382c1dd85c5ed48cb
18c633a5b937da0eb25845e18998f105e486475a
85718 F20101203_AABSNR szymanski_m_Page_85.jpg
5410d2f555bfbf448b91feb44b2bc9e0
f8dc5d1b9b9a77af3c5e9b38536a7af57546b59b
F20101203_AABSIV szymanski_m_Page_60.jp2
9d30a703e5ea79fc64ce04e44de3aea1
2d7e206a2be4cb14273e04ea285bcb0c8ef034ef
3111 F20101203_AABSSP szymanski_m_Page_02.QC.jpg
90e43df4920e2229c27b4c7d07ff4637
3f999f4674bfd916e40a25a04e1b8129c4b240d7
27665 F20101203_AABSNS szymanski_m_Page_53.QC.jpg
82038b8f8eca90acc01308de5f034ad2
13665534fd30fab46ad48b913aac001ab1f31587
611985 F20101203_AABSIW szymanski_m_Page_06.jp2
00f6a4de1d6fdda177fdc46dbb8524ba
37bd4906f187bb64410fbc7f99e15dd6d8c8698b
5516 F20101203_AABSSQ szymanski_m_Page_04thm.jpg
cb4bd2e25e74b6e34e595dd0f2b68f6d
b1d568697ac77c420d3329a70cfefd467f83d28d
26556 F20101203_AABSNT szymanski_m_Page_37.QC.jpg
abfd21163dcdf6c159eb28201c3528ca
d89895298e6cfa092ee234d31151dd1c3cb29df5
F20101203_AABSIX szymanski_m_Page_28.tif
70b00f877a25a884713dc59c226cdf2e
fd532799aec19ac3037ffe7533d995ab950dd94a
25359 F20101203_AABSSR szymanski_m_Page_05.QC.jpg
877d4861b737a0f411f5c8d0112cce31
843fb467d1c5276bfcddfd5cdbc004ab054a56b2
1051932 F20101203_AABSNU szymanski_m_Page_10.jp2
77a8762473d9025d8912b73bfa46f58b
7094324a7ad53819c893bf66da74874a569cc99d
F20101203_AABSIY szymanski_m_Page_44.tif
2ca38a8c3922ae376690395c09e59cf2
70e81ebc525959c2533ad84a17128a43842de7c6
6712 F20101203_AABSSS szymanski_m_Page_05thm.jpg
8bddb1cb3db1f6e5622774891957d241
d70e6d7cd060c401bb6ba9263578e53d12e4fc94
F20101203_AABSNV szymanski_m_Page_15.tif
aad44ff4ddd2872dc3fe4cf74d5a66db
55d0981187a0a20f3276fae1e2b67c7f53f3e3c6
15348 F20101203_AABSST szymanski_m_Page_06.QC.jpg
3237bc89f3e1eb8274fcdd90df4fc61a
3fc736619765d5d0939e9646e918b3c5cf3cd097
F20101203_AABSNW szymanski_m_Page_26.tif
a30af6ca6eef7b69eeb1477bb43011dd
04fd0661995a32badcd0117631f1a390b4f159c4
84247 F20101203_AABSGA szymanski_m_Page_51.jpg
0d87a9e33d9bed936c9e9acfcfe98fee
5b630b3893a09ad6b4bcca5b85b6961740e666b8
86417 F20101203_AABSIZ szymanski_m_Page_74.jpg
ef04982bcd9d4d04dca7dd053e937931
dc5c2d52c4e30d951b3f823b7ea2000f21ecc380
4240 F20101203_AABSSU szymanski_m_Page_06thm.jpg
58c560e878320fe98d4bf5463f6e7f2e
5339a109f6b2a3a0721a34ed36371432a39a339a
7522 F20101203_AABSNX szymanski_m_Page_59thm.jpg
8403fd170fb1c8522c8a290bf0989a0a
03d257f55dec7baeae9313ba9865130b9bf62ad2
27976 F20101203_AABSGB szymanski_m_Page_19.QC.jpg
53a2ed7843f3fbdfb35d7e28aba3cef6
4217d52e0ff986cdb37b814e2b08d9dfd8cfb00f
25714 F20101203_AABSSV szymanski_m_Page_07.QC.jpg
396afbd49a4b28d0025e89554b8dd58b
4ea1d34c6e44f256b1bdb32afd9f3039da9a76b2
F20101203_AABSLA szymanski_m_Page_11.jp2
b78d235ffb52612b161fe2ffdaaff42b
64e57b115157b464a3838e8f0b23f0e0534db2ae
F20101203_AABSNY szymanski_m_Page_63.jp2
95e38a8fbd6fd7661f2fed6ead782473
9baef61a9e0cd3f17a96a22ad41d303505823c35
F20101203_AABSGC szymanski_m_Page_25.jp2
a39b6e0933f93ae2c1c24d1e23d419da
6e71cd3bfdccc882e9ffcd7dc1f9381ad6803985
7005 F20101203_AABSSW szymanski_m_Page_07thm.jpg
a5a49788a370d08e1174774eaf1a36a8
bdaa2e0761dcdf7718ac6b04623c9398b6764f40
7025 F20101203_AABSLB szymanski_m_Page_39thm.jpg
e29d137ec80931336ca9e3cfb42a1850
68ef4b304b45c28318dbc7098a0b5232d86951b5
F20101203_AABSNZ szymanski_m_Page_87.tif
9369d55a307ea84c48027dcc62ea58e2
cf0e169d571410f510d1c765b2246a73e8f401fa
28028 F20101203_AABSGD szymanski_m_Page_35.QC.jpg
e6158c3d6228af29b9368074e7e0cddc
e3ecd28d017a6fdf27b096943f096a921e831f9a
28112 F20101203_AABSSX szymanski_m_Page_08.QC.jpg
a8a46112a96d14eee41ee3e369e3a71c
e2746e52cc1fd799ad0eb23cd730bf6ec9ed50d1
F20101203_AABSGE szymanski_m_Page_29.tif
1352293777ac22d96554a4dda4fb0100
e5759c2188b8a1389c35019e0c7db490b59e05f7
F20101203_AABSSY szymanski_m_Page_08thm.jpg
f9b078a7c1dea4f50185f3777b4390ff
a949f9d024d9033db2c3a58f1dbc4b772625fd06
7615 F20101203_AABSLC szymanski_m_Page_65thm.jpg
da6ae81969860d70a27c3bb8980f1062
3676d77c6fad15c90461eb2c88ae4e60ec601491
F20101203_AABSGF szymanski_m_Page_24.tif
36ad41bb715a1e9da7a037061c9c1a9e
3de4555d4268f0a54aa17e0eb4cade562a9dce29
1051943 F20101203_AABSQA szymanski_m_Page_15.jp2
46ae38d065ae3157c912cdad4f9b3247
f4738b8cdf818c16cd80f68d8d1203619d022f52
7463 F20101203_AABSSZ szymanski_m_Page_09thm.jpg
5e9549a9a739487cb8340d3d0f51d886
50246ef80b1f0737a521e399f07a1a733f68e542
2284 F20101203_AABSLD szymanski_m_Page_54thm.jpg
791a363d6ce02ad03bf749e435e1c2ae
429ad97914d521088aefc5443c39d81e3a4b7fd2
89269 F20101203_AABSGG szymanski_m_Page_42.jpg
51e63a9e5dd6542bb99b1a0e1b56f91f
6dd1f3b7c3e7c7f1ced8f26d5b10a2a73efe65cd
F20101203_AABSQB szymanski_m_Page_16.jp2
057c35af5846d9b097fecdae708ca280
e0eecac35ccf74630150103d45ae014451e48af7
7478 F20101203_AABSLE szymanski_m_Page_44thm.jpg
60a80a88c50afc6ffcf0fcae89bc9c3e
0f8455c078710d63f663f5eec929a617c5ea8898
4687 F20101203_AABSGH szymanski_m_Page_13.QC.jpg
a880025f2e8e47200cc1fa79bf413953
19a8863646f4d12088c395a80b22a2fb0c33da41
1051955 F20101203_AABSQC szymanski_m_Page_18.jp2
b816a45132b217005fd791337fc7c50e
8ada35dd50305c59f50b0f4ac2d184c6c9377f53
24985 F20101203_AABSVA szymanski_m_Page_66.QC.jpg
5b952a163c5980b6eeb7778bf1e1b931
c484a36b792de8d3798a8e350f690353d3ef46be
28325 F20101203_AABSLF szymanski_m_Page_65.QC.jpg
90505f0e07cade828e151c7c89ff4fc8
c32a1f197a6b03800d31b73ee220ac9de74a777d
7174 F20101203_AABSGI szymanski_m_Page_21thm.jpg
214d944c862912b5f4318402d381d984
afc7e3f7b460006c907e15efdaa6c6f87fd040b6
F20101203_AABSQD szymanski_m_Page_19.jp2
a7307017886a608c7746f5706fdc9bcb
227434bdd52bd385ac5250dcde2ac8299edad475
27893 F20101203_AABSVB szymanski_m_Page_67.QC.jpg
5f35643c09252347da7d5d15a100cdd8
6a6122678d14605d879176ea7d4b18741001c24e
196688 F20101203_AABSLG szymanski_m_Page_54.jp2
e1dd92bf4eadd39da75b06d5eb5eb8e6
d2fac22341fff2694f3f056f4f6b7b1b835a7e77
F20101203_AABSGJ szymanski_m_Page_47.jp2
f108e5f537b9e8f523311b44a3319046
53ae4bfaa9e37b1993ea5ed13c541ec84df4ea05
F20101203_AABSQE szymanski_m_Page_22.jp2
b816a0d3ebbcacca661b9112c3aa6146
65ddf5b5217e30123a66a61f44ed4c5b8d4589a1
27528 F20101203_AABSVC szymanski_m_Page_68.QC.jpg
0c9e93b84141567886ad84673be05687
d1ab6aa556b7aaada92cb54e3402866664c738bf
81048 F20101203_AABSLH szymanski_m_Page_05.jpg
321ec49aee2869926a746ebfd606edd4
dda74f20a512220e6220f9cea341d00eba45040d
7270 F20101203_AABSGK szymanski_m_Page_52thm.jpg
b6bd938b8b675501cf2244ece8a48ba9
40ddc68beebe7e66d8aa623232bba200629afcb8
F20101203_AABSQF szymanski_m_Page_23.jp2
ee007d78ebd84019a2f68bbca1a7b927
470e42ea49109694383cd5f007c99a0a89814518
28205 F20101203_AABSVD szymanski_m_Page_69.QC.jpg
99a8126d199e364e7c0e310b8be3bf46
fe0ce3a7e9527eeb8826eaaf8f38e4f9d13abf54
F20101203_AABSLI szymanski_m_Page_82.tif
673273f68a5e72a00d439c166520c100
bac782ae2f3d507a5edcb3a6edf3b2e343b2cdbf
7096 F20101203_AABSGL szymanski_m_Page_85thm.jpg
978273667df7460799ef39719c6b122d
12c87e35a3ed1bf43dc3392e92be53fd980eba2b
F20101203_AABSQG szymanski_m_Page_24.jp2
53aa1725ea186337111035bb9afbe46e
6c847b52ce5908b11dc3d25175d9bc5169c0f515
27503 F20101203_AABSVE szymanski_m_Page_70.QC.jpg
e9c073338841d708bac87247db4b6fa1
f8e5be4b7118ec9a30013f8692c604af415cc30a
F20101203_AABSLJ szymanski_m_Page_21.jp2
e9308452a620f5ec18e7a5e2392d3e0a
0dbacd07b1a6a7d48c67421edfc7cac1ed341983
85347 F20101203_AABSGM szymanski_m_Page_09.jpg
1fe12b0d1b4d4de1942fd85fa953e33b
359372cb0e58f90142c431b7527f5bd3bcf60147
28185 F20101203_AABSVF szymanski_m_Page_71.QC.jpg
ddf97bc4a1f8d3b346f4f51ca25c19af
2011f951821ddb0a9ed23394ea2dc9bee2b346d1
87249 F20101203_AABSLK szymanski_m_Page_26.jpg
913d6f85ab82c3b8df2254cfad153ffe
5ebc03ac1c4286f6036fbc2206262dac5fe071a7
7511 F20101203_AABSGN szymanski_m_Page_10thm.jpg
f7541b7102cd55421171710e20d2ed53
c2b45f02633a952680a2ceb7702883758628607a
1051969 F20101203_AABSQH szymanski_m_Page_26.jp2
ade22158b47522e79b234d44993a475d
2a300fa5a56f8471e316efc85c7db796ae736f57
7520 F20101203_AABSVG szymanski_m_Page_75thm.jpg
3729672a78b35f290caa0ab90b307d5b
ea409c39942c221fe652b4e6299aca8974d3a82e
7479 F20101203_AABSLL szymanski_m_Page_70thm.jpg
219f23c27794b22c562ffc61a1ce82ef
a24be3fac8d75cb199b86028aa8e3882be77f58c
27427 F20101203_AABSGO szymanski_m_Page_44.QC.jpg
60dea189b7ab6c3bdce736b6dc7dab61
a303c6b668eaf2d86320accbaed395b7879fb22a
1051942 F20101203_AABSQI szymanski_m_Page_30.jp2
7fef44b06a0afa1d79330b2de6420744
85e68c0d711b4c8009762c3f7428f6e2341f6f53
26190 F20101203_AABSVH szymanski_m_Page_76.QC.jpg
1dd476196c28b08945f0ed6bde26d4b6
e0474a4fa8f389027ee2a342f67ad5958df662aa
F20101203_AABSLM szymanski_m_Page_02.tif
acbe6187df1addad1ea5205b5c10f551
b6c690bb22ed407049979b8e3daf653dee51d5e9
26321 F20101203_AABSGP szymanski_m_Page_11.QC.jpg
d958bf8ee1e44b1611bd937208c7522c
6f03032c09b9efdc1ce02ebe59f365ee90277b5d
F20101203_AABSQJ szymanski_m_Page_33.jp2
ac4946820ae5e59c23e5dcc5383e9797
32428868e4bbd53b8814f62428748ac4adf39a53
7230 F20101203_AABSVI szymanski_m_Page_76thm.jpg
a6d5ff7b31ca594c7a3a97e9cfc1ed06
7462d3c3769e927ae910ac7a7620908ce45ae6f0
7425 F20101203_AABSLN szymanski_m_Page_67thm.jpg
741afe9810668a7473d6ba5386761d18
8738c0b8f2d157f5840ae514b81b367b8a19bd8b
F20101203_AABSGQ szymanski_m_Page_41.tif
1476a3bb3b10d4547636abbdba0bf4ca
45ba0e744b7227a9e576a6ca8f20c1940ed13478
F20101203_AABSQK szymanski_m_Page_34.jp2
bb54c27a63649865ded933eb9b2838a0
ea604ade63ee9a8ca81ea3bf7998d357ca776263
3497 F20101203_AABSVJ szymanski_m_Page_78thm.jpg
4d7344d2ce78769fa8f93b9e1c4e3720
fd722af9a0231468a7511d707bef00512660bf47
F20101203_AABSLO szymanski_m_Page_24.jpg
90a41b76f8794e70b95ced5cc4ca8d85
48ae54a9afb30dd7342ae5295c22645fe4f3b052
7526 F20101203_AABSGR szymanski_m_Page_69thm.jpg
19e0c58bd5a5ea048e255d57060634ea
af9c070818d75bd97c3ca1de90e801be7a5f7ed2
F20101203_AABSQL szymanski_m_Page_39.jp2
0927809dbce6ff02ae99db10929d71dc
6a57a8894f223ff222d4200723d1275dae90218d
25946 F20101203_AABSVK szymanski_m_Page_79.QC.jpg
14481bf84b068541890a6446be0c229b
cccada7b000f1f1be3d73b93707ff525edca7bb8
1051951 F20101203_AABSLP szymanski_m_Page_17.jp2
c5e0b7b98617b298ae55c1f08b097743
b1de18bc349bd1e6e2ec47d97602a9846561cc7e
F20101203_AABSGS szymanski_m_Page_14.jp2
45893253d76a904c4c78f2e4221fdfb5
53b95e9f73c365155e2090fe9436fb84c9cb38fe
1051941 F20101203_AABSQM szymanski_m_Page_40.jp2
a9f57478956777eb1556761ddf7a2ce5
b67391c1ecd049a64830e8a89026c3284ec9a3a7
7147 F20101203_AABSVL szymanski_m_Page_79thm.jpg
3c01ebb7a63c5fb334e5720680d42868
5198401855b2a82c2952028717c58ab8622ae6e2
F20101203_AABSLQ szymanski_m_Page_51.jp2
ca3f9cb369a1f607f21c88aba2c88c9e
c4c2e6ce4586a76089721daf2788de5b458a2b14
F20101203_AABSGT szymanski_m_Page_51.tif
5272b6a87e65940f392a2e2cc047fd61
9c374f657ee1f5e82bad9346e4c90df5b7f0b073
F20101203_AABSQN szymanski_m_Page_41.jp2
36e38aa3fe003060d5417b72fdc56e11
9ed8e69f881c0bdaece68df3658b4046df8aceb6
27260 F20101203_AABSLR szymanski_m_Page_64.QC.jpg
53866d4ee36822b949db5353e12e03b8
8e95af8ff6679ebd9ff8da2e501e61d580b21556
27421 F20101203_AABSGU szymanski_m_Page_75.QC.jpg
ddd787a2f86c0bd74c78c315d0823261
8027b57e9b2313a2a7eeca2be56dd25f08eee1f2
F20101203_AABSQO szymanski_m_Page_43.jp2
f24421c552c76b3f0ef9c0245eb6690d
1f8ddcb25e958431108d835cf5d5ef1cd7742b80
27004 F20101203_AABSVM szymanski_m_Page_82.QC.jpg
b27743cee9bb5318cb768ddcb537bb3f
7b3c36519e75e48c62d6b9f13b91190f2918e978
F20101203_AABSLS szymanski_m_Page_76.tif
7be028313c810cc84ae39efc4bf3489b
8ba7e08490077c2b8c97367157b220cf1d809469
1051985 F20101203_AABSGV szymanski_m_Page_77.jp2
66293132a436628157eb3b6cd2a397fd
980787ebc34ad302156b87c97d7c81bad1fdc293
F20101203_AABSQP szymanski_m_Page_46.jp2
102430838d83c06a0d67b10626c20baa
d30bc790c49fafb36dadfafa0aeef6fcf1dd1f51
F20101203_AABSVN szymanski_m_Page_82thm.jpg
d2884b3bbee645ce3da99e448784eda0
1f43db11c4a32ee2eb3a78502f3675da07e58a1a
F20101203_AABSLT szymanski_m_Page_11.tif
2db5a719c722c4e87ab6bbbac3f73a9e
0e442ff437b32e2584efb776f28e5d881a0a8e87
6962 F20101203_AABSGW szymanski_m_Page_73thm.jpg
d570111b6ccac18d10a69d5baf8743c5
726dcc24af78bad82588a6f06fd9e16b637786f3
1051957 F20101203_AABSQQ szymanski_m_Page_49.jp2
6201b9c0b4782fb01cfbe815a42ab02b
8c4f40c1ad0acdbac382b15f6e32765750bde6c1
25823 F20101203_AABSVO szymanski_m_Page_83.QC.jpg
b4c4b61e1caf4a36e103a9a8eb4666a2
c3a92c613dad9bb70d1d63748568a3175259c662
84205 F20101203_AABSLU szymanski_m_Page_11.jpg
6af25b97d98db89466980204d6e53966
6d922331f82a75c503b80da4f4c0d633b6ef44e0
27885 F20101203_AABSGX szymanski_m_Page_15.QC.jpg
acff14ca28bacdc77e2331cd8351ed4e
8d09bd65cc293b1703a2e536aa28295e867fc0c5
F20101203_AABSQR szymanski_m_Page_50.jp2
2c6979ac34eddb7fefe7006831ac6cb3
9cc8cc3a6b749c53df4b6f2c0319ffc4af58f69e
7267 F20101203_AABSVP szymanski_m_Page_83thm.jpg
c7ab84e04ca24b656910cc2c874c1b45
1a057dd5cb17b24490d2365be45fd3ce6180e92c
86875 F20101203_AABSGY szymanski_m_Page_61.jpg
c85481167cdcbf2551e0d1bfe2261760
12c3b56a4b009721cdc12ac78d030860ae68e290
F20101203_AABSQS szymanski_m_Page_55.jp2
26ba790b6c00ddedd891b76e9d5523af
e9516e08512d11aad2e15743203aa91a7be996de
84316 F20101203_AABSLV szymanski_m_Page_14.jpg
6a6ee0aa33615b7822241251c3de7cac
587c4da3ebd0e196db0ca15758233e84e3f60891
16144 F20101203_AABSVQ szymanski_m_Page_84.QC.jpg
1ac18c158d25862c0b06c9bba6923a9d
58497459a04bc9f50c306dc05e114b83e86fc34b
7523 F20101203_AABSGZ szymanski_m_Page_34thm.jpg
3cc2fc0369e533b5f77d7865b356b975
4ad25718957baab31c763c7e82b6f6781c7c8f7d
1051939 F20101203_AABSQT szymanski_m_Page_56.jp2
657db917816d11b5399785c9bcf4a6a3
cae40208ddb73592e5b0133498ffe8cef7d49002
1051952 F20101203_AABSLW szymanski_m_Page_48.jp2
99667b7744b0065d028a11de5bedc125
ea07018027a5053612af53ee7ce8ee7272663b04
25340 F20101203_AABSVR szymanski_m_Page_86.QC.jpg
6f2608b2a7debcc5e75e62a13c16371f
23edbcde0da481b488286c4bf2159547a69fff10
1051964 F20101203_AABSQU szymanski_m_Page_65.jp2
e5c60412ec581cda6f471a2182c601a5
e578180564d1e028430a715a33a5cf12055e17c7
1051966 F20101203_AABSLX szymanski_m_Page_35.jp2
581858a31a4d95081be9602966925b72
e0447ee14806aa44a712f39ae164e36e50256353
24968 F20101203_AABSVS szymanski_m_Page_87.QC.jpg
ab640ba8ac0c2efca3040177548c9d5e
465a7ab66ecd0fc022bdac7a72e18128d6fafc14
F20101203_AABSQV szymanski_m_Page_66.jp2
d3d779800f71d6aa84574e11d5ce251a
d3d559821f46b3c62649dfb5c8f87b98484b16eb
27744 F20101203_AABSLY szymanski_m_Page_34.QC.jpg
036f9a580f2c264c3ed799778862f3f4
a6cd2c3f3160eada2d555357f41196060d3df0cb
5534 F20101203_AABSVT szymanski_m_Page_88.QC.jpg
6f87d8f92ff8ea771388e6179d574299
a8490bf53581fe0d12fb58c250ad67df1f6e133a
1051947 F20101203_AABSQW szymanski_m_Page_68.jp2
e0f5ca999e11aac8150aba952e2c8af4
366fe419bdf1c2973d7b3d8ca3c4041cc2aa5404
7316 F20101203_AABSJA szymanski_m_Page_32thm.jpg
fbdba46c884be7b330046570524ab8e1
f87acddc190bae8e4bc49a334dc23f3411d883b6
27207 F20101203_AABSLZ szymanski_m_Page_81.QC.jpg
6bbdb99120344f5b2d4c72c254c68466
8893bed21b4614b7508923f95d52a078e6885124
67513 F20101203_AABSVU UFE0022246_00001.mets
4827e89475d812bb7224ed685bd1d213
b56a3ce0ead5b48cad29b7160878c9990a710b75
1051959 F20101203_AABSQX szymanski_m_Page_69.jp2
e6834ddff32038a8ddeb49fda0d26be0
807e920c4647f91de07c1343db5051d62c1cfb23
18373 F20101203_AABSJB szymanski_m_Page_88.jpg
2bb7047b465fac8c818c1dcfbe2fcd2e
87c26d01b449ab4d97433f18bb575c9ce6ffb125
F20101203_AABSOA szymanski_m_Page_86.jp2
23a55c55f4a1400cd20b571ca834ca80
3b76e1088b7df76e3bf043da73a67e3de171ad7a
F20101203_AABSQY szymanski_m_Page_70.jp2
41b89f44ee44dc9d9cce44d67cfbd922
3d2aa6dce0c4c17b97b1aac7464277a9d165c975
87306 F20101203_AABSJC szymanski_m_Page_59.jpg
2b8f64ffcf669d8b33da158045805733
b19353a4d4564f7658087cec2c98ac50ef3ddebb
27828 F20101203_AABSOB szymanski_m_Page_55.QC.jpg
8cc01e0b1d12740becb73702ff2048aa
dfae5f8c5ed84636909ce04435b2c35fa2c45779
1051949 F20101203_AABSQZ szymanski_m_Page_72.jp2
4159f36e3190daec3bd52a08750609b2
aaceda695a0a14da8e07ce25d26b0e5b37e8b8be
25855 F20101203_AABSJD szymanski_m_Page_80.QC.jpg
51b29cd5d0dea928eeea325a62d33580
204d92787829acf17688f0814721c1ac91d6d866



PAGE 1

1 LABORING TO UPHOLD THE IMAGE OF SUBURBIA: REPRESENTATIONS OF DEVIANT SEXUAL DESIRE IN THE VIRGIN SUICIDES AND MIDDLESEX By MALLORY SZYMANSKI A THESIS PRESENTED TO THE GRADUATE SCHOOL OF THE UNIVERSITY OF FLOR IDA IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF ARTS UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA 2008

PAGE 2

2 2008 Mallory Szymanski

PAGE 3

3 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I cannot express enough gratitude for the networ k of support that has m ade this project possible. First, I thank my supervisory committee chair, Trysh Travis, for her dedication to this project. Her rigorous work ethi c and high expectations have insp ired me to settle for nothing less than my best effort. I am grateful to Kim Emery, my second reader, for asking difficult questions and acknowledging the various potential readings of a single text. I am also indebted to Amy Long, a colleague and friend, whose unwavering support has helped me overcome various intellectual obstacles. Her patience, guidance, and rational sense have been incalculable resources for me. Finally, I thank my Mom for helping me to digest each day's difficulties by encouraging me to continually put life into perspective. I thank my Dad for listening with an open mind and often understanding me better than I understand myself.

PAGE 4

4 TABLE OF CONTENTS page ACKNOWLEDGMENTS...............................................................................................................3 ABSTRACT.....................................................................................................................................5 CHAP TER 1 INTRODUCTION....................................................................................................................7 2 AMERICA AND/AS SUBURBIA: CONS TRUCTION AND CONTES TATION OF THE IMAGE OF THE AMERICAN SUBURB.................................................................... 14 Historicizing the Suburb.........................................................................................................14 Critics of American Conformity in Suburbia......................................................................... 18 Revisionist Critique of Suburbia............................................................................................ 24 Searching for Suburbia in Literature...................................................................................... 28 Suburbia and Sexuality......................................................................................................... ..30 3 THE THREAT OF FEMALE HETEROSEXUAL DESIRE IN THE VI RGIN SUICIDES ...............................................................................................................................34 Policing Female Sexuality: Repression of the Lisbon Girls' Desire....................................... 38 Keeping up Appearances: Restoratio n of the Hom e and the Suburb..................................... 42 Misrecognition of City Filth in Suburbia................................................................................ 46 Conclusion..............................................................................................................................51 4 INCEST AND INTERSEX: BECOMING SUBURBAN IN MIDDLESE X ..........................55 Transcending Difference: Race and Class in Suburbia......................................................... 60 Linking Whiteness and Heterosexuality................................................................................. 65 Deviance Revealed: Callie/Cal............................................................................................... 68 Middlesex, Intersex and Suburbia. .......................................................................................... 73 5 CONCLUSION..................................................................................................................... ..79 LIST OF REFERENCES...............................................................................................................85 BIOGRAPHICAL SKETCH.........................................................................................................88

PAGE 5

5 Abstract of Thesis Presen ted to the Graduate School of the University of Florida in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Arts LABORING TO UPHOLD THE IMAGE OF SUBURBIA: REPRESENTATIONS OF DEVIANT SEXUAL DESIRE IN THE VIRGIN SUICIDES AND MIDDLESEX By Mallory Szymanski May 2008 Chair: Trysh Travis Major: Women's Studies This paper argues that Eugenides novels employ instances of deviant sexuality to unmask the efforts of suburbanites to define their living spacesagainst the city as the locus of filthas stable and orderly models of the American Drea m. Existing socio-histor ical scholarship about suburbia contends with a notion of the suburb as a haven for white, middle-class families. Two competing perspectives emerge out of this scholar ship: the first critiques the conformist force of the homogeneous American suburb; the second revises the history of suburbia, complicating the picture by providing evidence of Black suburbanization and worki ng-class suburbs. I conclude that while suburbs have historically housed differences of race and class, the collective imagined suburb includes only white middle-class families. This paper seeks to exte nd the critique of the revisionist scholars by introduc ing sexuality as a category of analysis and exploring representations of dev iant sexuality in suburban literature. My reading of Eugenides' novels suggests that implementing sexuality as a lens through which to interrogate suburban ideologies offers further insight into the ways in which suburbanites define themselves in opposition to th e filth (sexual and otherwise) that resides in the city. In The Virgin Suicides Eugenides demonstrates the s uburban impulse to suffocate the sexual desires of five white, middleclass sist ers, resulting in their suicides. In Middlesex he

PAGE 6

6 complicates his critique, showing how race and class differences dissolve behind a faade of normative heterosexual family structure, that is, until, evidence of devian ce surfaces in the birth of an intersexed child. This intervention into suburban discourse will foreground the process by which individuals hold up for themselves the image of the American suburb and exert an enormous effort to achieve and maintain rightful membership in white, middle-class suburbia. This thesis speculates that further interdisciplinary scholarship about suburbia must be done in order to attend to th e dissonance between the image of a white-washed homogeneous suburb and its more complicated experiential coun terpart. I conclude that sexuality, as a category of analysis, connects with race and class in order to emphasize the inherent heterosexuality that frames the image of suburbia. An analysis of sexuality offers a more complete picture of the ways in which individuals labor to conceal their various deviations from suburban norms.

PAGE 7

7 CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION Am erica in 1951 had a population of 150 million no interstate highways, and only about a quarter as many cars. Men wore hats and ties almost everywhere. Women prepared every meal more or less from scratch. Milk came in bottles. The mailman came on foot. Bill Bryson, The Life and Times of the Thunderbolt Kid The America that Bill Bryson describe s as the setting for his youth in his book, The Life and Times of the Thunderbolt Kid: A Memoir conjures a specific image of a simple, relaxed and content suburban nation. It res onates with the type of family life and moral code present in television shows such as Leave it to Beaver and Happy Days that depicted a time of economic prosperity, political quiescence and social stability (Marcus 25). A commonsense vision of 1950s America includes single family homes, marri ed couples with children and pets, white picket fences, men in gray flannel suits and housew ives in aprons. Centra l to this image is the overwhelming sense of satisfaction this lifestyle effects. Bryson comments: I can't imagine there has ever been a more gratifying time or pl ace to be alive than America in the 1950s. No country has ever known such prosperity (5). Bryson recalls his childhood suburb as a happy place that put the American Dream within reach for more people than ever before. The pos twar period witnessed an influx of Americans to the suburbs who appropriated their own happy Am erican lifestyle by moving to places like Levittown, purchasing appliances, and mowing their lawns. The image of the American suburb has transf ormed slightly over the twentieth century, but it remains linked to the ideas about what constitutes a happy and normal American life that originate from the 1950s suburb. The continuity of the image over time is reflected in Richard Bachman's fictive account of an Ohio suburb at the end of the twentieth century. In his novel The Regulators, he describes a hot July afternoon on Poplar Street:

PAGE 8

8 it's all watermelon and Kool-Aid and foul tips off the end of the bat; it's all the summer you ever wanted and more here in the center of the United States of America, life as good as you ever dreamed it could be, with Chev rolets parked in driveways and steaks in refrigerator meat-drawers waiting to be sla pped on the barbecue in the backyard come evening (and will there be apple pie to follow? What do you think?). This is the land of green lawns and carefully tended flowerbeds; this is the Kingdom of Ohio (20) In this excerpt, Bachman depict s the American suburb as a location where day-to-day existence is happy and carefree. Individuals pursue their own duties and pleas ures but all merge at various points to enjoy a fond sense of community. Life in Bachman's suburb is simple yet uniquely American, fully equipped with baseball and watermelon. These snapshots of the American suburb arti culate the lifestyle it promised for the millions of people who have relocated from urban and rural areas and continue to reside there into the twenty-first century. Noting that the 20 00 U.S. Census reported th at half the American population resides in suburbs, Becky M. Nicolaid es and Andrew Weise at test to the importance of suburbia in the current moment. They conte nd that suburbia is a lands cape that is ubiquitous, a backdrop to life so commonplace that few take cons cious notice of it (1). Thus, while Bryson expresses nostalgia for a happier 1950s suburb, the census shows that 50 percent of Americans still believe in that place and choose to make it their home nearly ha lf a century later. Bachman's description of a 1990s version of America looks very similar to Bryson's memory of his childhood neighborh ood. The fact that 40 years se parates the two indicates the powerful cultural impact the image of the suburb has had over time. Americans' continued desire for suburban life necessitates an interr ogation of the idea of the suburb, specifically because, as Nicolaides and Weise point out, it ha s become so commonplace that to be American means also to be suburban (1). The idea that the suburb serves as a ha ppy refuge for white, middle-class families has indeed been challenged since the middle of th e twentieth century. Two bodies of contestation

PAGE 9

9 have emerged out of suburban socio-historical scholarship and criti que the image of the American suburb. On one side, social critics a nd scholars have derided the suburb for fostering unproductive conformity and rendering an American culture that is wh ite-washed, homogeneous and unimpressive. While they confirm the image of the suburb as white and middle-class, they fear that it lacks aesthet ic value. On the other side, scholars have revised this earlier generation of critique by insisting that suburbia does encomp ass diversity and incorporates racial and class difference. They contend that the image of the suburb does not translate to live suburban experience. Chapter Two, America and/as S uburbia: Construction a nd Contestation of the Image of the American Suburb, traces the orig in of the suburb to ei ghteenth century London, where suburbs developed in order to remove whit e, bourgeois women from the filth inherent in the industrial city. Relying on Robert Fishman's characteri zation of London, this chapter illustrates the central role that proper (hetero)sexu ality played in the construction of suburbia. Then, a review of the diverging discourses in the suburban literature reveals that scholars overlook sexuality, in favor of race and class (and in a few cases, gender), in order to leverage their critique. In this gap, I position my analysis of texts that speak to questions of race and class, but also call attention to sexuality as a central axis of difference for interrogating the image of suburbia. Queer studies scholars emphasize the necessity of considering sexuality as a distinct and integral category of analysis in theorizing about spatial organization. In Queer Phenomenology Sara Ahmed investigates spatial organization thro ugh the lens of sexuality. In a discussion about queer orientations of objects in space, she argues that the desire for connection generates likeness, at the same time that likeness is read as the sign of connection (122). This doubling allows communities to perpetually reinforce the naturalness of their likeness, but Ahmed points

PAGE 10

10 out that shared attributes are retrospectively taken up as evidence of community (122). Thus it becomes naturalized that queer se xualities belong in m obile, diverse and anonymous cities (as is commonly believed) while white, middle-classnormal families are best suited for the suburb. Ahmed employs the metaphor of peas in a pod, reminding us that peas even from the same pod are hardly similar. However their proxim ity to one another erases difference. In other words, the touching of the peas to one anothe r and to the same podtheir contiguityeffects likeness that is linked to the fam ilial, the familiar. (124). Similarly, the avoidance of difference or the refusal to acknowledge it in suburbia allows for it to disappear from view. Thus, critics of suburban conformity are able to see homoge nization in a far more subtly diverse and cosmopolitan neighborhood. They can select Lev ittown as the signifying example of suburban conformity without considering other cont exts that might suggest otherwise. Ahmed also thinks of institutions as orient ation devices that take the shape of what resides in them (132). She argues that instituti onal spaces are shaped by the proximity of some bodies and not others (132). In the context of suburbia, indeed wh ite bodies gather and cohere (132) to form the edges of such spaces Specifically, white, middle-class, heterosexual bodies define the perimeters of their suburban spaces, and reify them with fences, gates and legislation. To those who inhabit the suburbs, these boundaries are permeable and thus, invisible (or at least, inconsequential) to them. Ahmed re minds us that institutions are created over a long period of repetitive decisions ( 133) which, in the cas e of suburbia is clear. Historical, sociological, and urban planni ng studies reveal the myriad ways suburban boundaries were established and maintained according to strict li nes of race and class. Thus, as Ahmed argues about whiteness as an institution applies fully to suburbia: to those inside suburbia, the lines dividing it from the city are invi sible. However, nonwhite an d/or queer bodiesnon-residents

PAGE 11

11 in suburbia are made to feel uncomfortable, exposed, visible and different when they take up this space (133). In order to elucidate the r epetition of decisions (133) th at produce an image of suburbia as distinctly white, middle-cl ass, heterosexual and homogenous I analyze two suburban novels written by Jeffrey Eugenides using sexual ity as a central category of analysis: The Virgin Suicides and Middlesex. These novels take place in subur ban Detroit and foreground instances of deviant sexuality in order to unmask the s uburb as merely an imagined space, one that requires a significant amount of willful labor to perpetuate. The Virgin Suicides tells the story of the five beautiful Lisbon sisters who find them selves suffocated by the normalizing forces of their neighborhood and escape its expectations by committing suicide. Narrated from the perspective of a group of adu lt men who grew up alongside the Lisbon family, the novel recounts the events during the summer between the first girl 's suicide and that of the remaining four. Middlesex is narrated by Cal, an intersexed man who was raised as a girl in a Greek-American family and leads a transient adult life as a member of the Foreign Service. Tracing the incestuous relationship of his grandparents, Cal ou tlines the story of his family's emigration to America and their journey toward becoming memb ers of the American suburb. Ultimately, Cal chooses to leave the suburb in search of hims elf in San Francisco and Berlin, from which he narrates the story. I begin the analysis of Eugenides' novels in Chapter Three, The Threat of Female Heterosexual Desire in The Virgin Suicides, turning to his first nove l to explore the ways deviant female desire disrupts the se xual status quo in suburbia. In The Virgin Suicides we can see that the attempts to contai n the sexualities of the five Lisb on sisters are congruent with the active efforts of suburbanites to perceive their neighborhood as separa te from and superior to the

PAGE 12

12 nearby city of Detroit. Eugenides emphasizes the impulse of suburbanites to continually work to uphold the illusion that subur bia is unaffected by and immune to city filth. It also prompts us to look to Middlesex at the way suburbanite s labor to dissolve se xual deviance alongside differences of race and class. Chapter Four, Incest and Intersex: Suburban Sexual Deviance in Middlesex looks at the ways Eugenides extends his crit ique of the suburban myth in his second novel by tracing the journey of a family of Greek immigrants, who secretly engage in incestuous unions, but are able to access racial and class privilege and eventually gain membership in an American suburb. In Middlesex, Eugenides traces the historical developmen t of suburbia alongside the story of the Stephanides familys attempt to grasp the Am erican (suburban) Dream. The novel shows how Cals intersexed identity bars him from suburba n membership in ways that his familys ethnic and class background did not. Th is elaborates my argument a bout white, middle-class female sexuality in The Virgin Suicides by foregrounding the way the Stephanides family becomes suburban, able to dissolve their differences of race and class in order to conceal their incestuous lineage. Cal is the culmination of two generations of deviant sexual desire, a haunting reminder that sexuality in suburbia exists outside traditional boundaries but is continually covered up and ignored. By way of conclusion, I return to the subur ban discourse and the id eological significance of the suburban image and consider how my read ing of Eugenides' novels elaborates on it. Using sexuality as a central category of analysis illuminates the suburbanites continued efforts to define themselves against the deviance of the city and perpetuate the imagined suburb as a haven for reproductive heteronormativity. I suggest that literature serves as a template on which to imagine alternative conception of American suburba n identity. My work raises larger questions

PAGE 13

13 that further research might hope to answer by in corporating socio-historic al scholarship as well as literary representations of American suburbs.

PAGE 14

14 CHAPTER 2 AMERICA AND/AS SUBURBIA: CONSTR UCTION AND CONTES TATION OF THE IMAGE OF THE AMERICAN SUBURB While the suburban discourse is nuanced and varied, two bodies of thought emerge from the suburban studies literature: those who argue that a homogeneous, white middle-class suburb exists in reality and are fearful (or in some cases, celebratory) of its effects; and those who believe the image to be more complicated and nuanced and that despite the imagined suburb, racial minorities and working-cl ass people have inhabited and c ontributed to the suburbs all along. First, I explore the appr oaches of scholars whose work confirms a homogeneous, whitewashed middle-class landscape in their criticism of th e suburb's tendency to foster conformity. Then, I examine the interventions made in terms of gender, race and class that make a case for diversity in the suburbs. Finally, I evaluate the trend toward lite rature as an ideal location for negotiating suburban identity. I ca ll for the introduction of sexuali ty as a category of analysis through which scholars can expose further grounds for suburban identity formations and also look to literature to illustrate the effects of th e intersections of race, class, gender and sexuality in suburbia. Historicizing the Suburb In order to understand the c onstruction of the suburb as a refuge and haven for white m iddle-class Americans, one must first examine the ideology of filth that ch aracterizes the city in which the suburb defines itself against. Robert Fishman traces the origin of the ideologically filthy city to industr ializing London, calling it birthplace of suburbia, which harbored both literal and figurative dirt that was to be escaped by those who could afford to relocate outside city limits (18). Fishman outlines the devel opment of middle-class suburbs of London that responded to the desire of the British bourgeoisi e to distance themselves from the crowded,

PAGE 15

15 dirty, noisy and unhealthy urban ce nter (23). As early as the ei ghteenth century, the ideological foundation of suburbia was defined in relation to its rejected opposite: the metropolis (27). The dichotomous relationship between city and suburb that emer ged from Victorian attitudes about space and place frames the wa y American suburbs would later become characterized. In contrast to early eighteenth century notions of a caste society in which social distinction was not diminished by proximity to the poor, the idea th at maintaining social status required physical segregation de veloped as the nineteenth cent ury approached (32). Several factors contributed to this tre nd. First, Fishman indicates that growing disparity in lifestyle between the wealthy and the poor facilitated an increas ing repulsion for the city and its lower classes. Next, he states that the bourgeoisie family unit turned inward and began to understand the nuclear family to be the overwhelming fo cus of its members' liv es (33). Third, the Evangelical movement that predominated in the second half of the eighteenth century emphasized moral purity, holding the nuclear fam ily as the desirable model and depicting the evils of city life (such as the lo ttery) as imminent threats to the natural order of family. Here, Fishman begins a brief analysis of female sexualit y. He contends that wh ile association with the city and its potential for sin wa s unavoidable for men because they needed to preserve economic ties with it, women could be protected from te mptation by remaining in their proper domestic sphere. Evangelical Christians perceived wo men as creatures whose passions overpowered their wills, Eves and Jezebels quicker to sin than men and thus required insulation from contact with the potentially dangerous urban dwellers (36). The conception of the city as a threat to the purity of (white) bourgeois women tied directly to the high level of mobility women enj oyed in the urban center. They encountered men of varying social statuses which opened up the potential for sexual transgression. Women

PAGE 16

16 participated in the workplace, which was often located below the family living space and moved somewhat freely in the public realm. By the nineteenth century, as Delo res Hayden points out in Redesigning the American Dream the notion that a woman's place was in the home pervaded and implied that no decent woman was out in city streets, going places where men went (209). Because home and workplace were often located in the same building, separation of spheres in city spaces was nearly impossible. The presen ce of women, especially working women, in public spaces was increasing understood to indicate se xual availability and a failure of the proper gender order. The nineteenth century belief was that because the working woman was no one urban man's property (her father or her husba nd had failed to keep her at home), she was every urban man's property (210). Hayden emphasizes that this Victorian model rests upon gendered assumptions that the proper sphe re of women was the home and th e rightful place for men was in the public sphere. Thus, contac t between white bourgeois wome n with the urban poor caused anxiety about the purity of women and threat ened to tarnish the moral superiority they demonstrated in their homes. Thus, the suburb functioned as both ideologi cal and literal escape from the real and imagined filth of urban London. The suburb originat ed in opposition to the ci ty and the threat of deviance that mobility and exchange fostered. As both Fishman and Hayden demonstrate, this impulse to constrain and protect the sexual pur ity of white bourgeois wo men motivated many of London's elites to relocate to the suburbs in the late eighteenth and early nineteenth century. This has direct implications on contemporary pe rceptions of suburban space into the twentieth and twenty-first centuries. Sociological and hi storical accounts of suburban space indicate that contemporary suburbia continues to rely on the opposition of the suburb to its city with the

PAGE 17

17 implicit, yet central, assumption about the necessity to police middle-class white women's sexuality by controlling their mobility. Suburbanization occurred later in the United States than it did in England primarily because industrialization in Amer ican cities occurred at a different pace. Fishman pinpoints the late nineteenth century railroad suburb as the apotheosis of American suburbs. As cities became increasingly populated and modernized, the land just beyond city limits became ideal residential spacefor those who could afford to travel by railroad between home an d city. The railroad provided remarkably rapid access to the center, yet its relatively high cost insulated the bourgeois peripheries from lower-class invasion (136). Fishman contends that in this historical moment, Americans perfected the classic s uburb (135) which was characterized by the pattern of tree shaded streets, broad open lawns, substantial houses set back from the sidewalks (145). The landscape fostered a union between nature and family lif e that allowed white bourgeois families to enjoy their private lives in a space that was clearly separate from the city. As Fishman notes, while the suburb indicates eco nomic and aesthetic succ ess, it is also a testimony to bourgeois anxieties, to deeply buried fears that transl ate into a contempt or hatred for the 'others' who inhabit the city (154). Elite Americans enjoyed insulation from the undesirable city population until the automobile democratized the suburb in the twentieth century. While scholars confirm that working-class people and racial minorities established residency in suburban spaces near the turn of th e twentieth century, the va lues and standards of the white (bourgeois) American middle class pe rvaded. Through statutory, ideological, and cultural means, they reinforced both the barriers and internal m eaning of their own elite suburb (Nicolaides and Weise 4). Follo wing World War II, widespread economic prosperity made it

PAGE 18

18 possible for more Americans to own homes, but by then suburbia had become imbued with enormous cultural meaning that would only expa nd later in the century. Through a combination of various cultural representations of suburbia an d legislative measures regulating who could live there, 'good' neighborhoods were perceived to be for the white and middle class. Postwar suburbs such as Levittown advertised not only a home but an American lifestyleone that was strictly reserved for white middle-class families. This lifestyle included proscribed gender roles reminiscent of those of Fishman's eighteenth century London. In fact, the suburb relied on an ideology of separate sphe res because it required specific roles to be fulfilled by each member of a nuclear family: husband worked outside the home and provided monetarily for his family, wife kept house and cared for the children, and children took advantage of the leisure opportuni ties available to them in thei r neighborhood. As the twentieth century wore on, observers began to realize th e cultural impact of suburbia, and many became concerned that this prized American lifestyle br ed conformity and lacked any valuable cultural aesthetic. Critics of American Co nformity in Suburbia By the middle of the twentieth century, sc holars of American suburbs were beginning to recognize various consequences of the increasing migration of white middle-class families out of cities and into suburbs. Advertisements in particular championed the suburb as the apex of the American Dream, symbolic of the success of bot h post-war American capitalism and democracy. They offered American G.I.s the opportunity to partake in the American Dream by purchasing a piece of suburbiafully equipped with state-of-the -art appliances in which they could raise a family and live comfortably. Scholars and critic s, however, launched atta cks on this promise of suburbia from two divergent angles. Some, su ch as William Whyte and Lewis Mumford, were skeptical of the homogeneity that tract housing facilitated and argued that this new way of life

PAGE 19

19 imposed conformity upon middle-class America and denied them individuali ty. Other scholars, increasingly as the twentieth century wore on, sought to revise suburban history, claiming that the American suburb is in fact, diverse on severa l levels. These revisionists insist that the conformist suburb is a mere ideology and that people of various race and class backgrounds laid claim to the American suburb. However, propone nts on each side of the polemic understand that the ideology of suburbia has increasingly become synonymous w ith America. But scholars disagree about whether the white, middle-class Amer ican suburb exists in reality or only as a shared perception of such place. The myth of s uburbia arose out of this debate, a phrase used to denote the disparity between the promise of homeownership and material success in places like Levittown and the actual delivery of a false sense of homogeneity and ultimately, a way of life not distinctly different from that in the city (Berger 39). In When America Became Suburban (2006), Robert A. Beauregard combines sociological and historical evidence to retrace the formulation of American national identity that occurred precisely at the collision of suburbanization, dom estic prosperity and global dominance of the United States. He terms this time period betw een the 1940s and the 1970s the short American Century (xiii). He argues th at conceptions of post-war American life were rooted in mass consumption, a new way of living that centere d on commodities and white collar labor. Advertising and television portray ed an uncritical picture of subur bia, citing ads for dishwashers and shows like Leave it to Beaver that insisted the American Dream was attainable in the suburb. Beauregard explains this impulse to presen t an image of the suburban way of life [as] ideologically and substantively clean and uniquely American as opposed to the filthy, racialized and riotous city as a political maneuver to situate American democracy and capitalism uniquely against both communism and their European cultural heritage. The opportunity to

PAGE 20

20 safeguard and insulate the home front and th e nuclear family within suburban boundaries motivated suburbanites distance them selves from the evils fostered in the city and beyond (159). The suburbs symbolized both political freedom and freedom of consumer choice to the industrializing Western European nations and of fered a uniquely American alternative to communism (170). And for many Americans, the s uburb was an alternative that was attainable, even sensible. Suburbanization led to Ameri can exceptionalism because no other nation in the world had made such a lifestyle so desirable and readily available to its citizens as did the United States during the 25 years after World War II. T hus, a national identity arose from the suburban landscape, characterized by freedom, progress and a shared sense that Americans are always in the process of becoming (183). Beauregard foregrounds the intellectual and l iterary critiques of the conformity, boredom and homogenization that resulted from tract housi ng, consumer culture and domestic life. (138). These critiques, ironically, were made at the sa me time families were rushing to the suburbs, namely in the 1960s and 1970s (141). Lewis Mumf ord's often quoted description of the tract housing developments and the lifestyles availabl e to their residents illustrates the powerful cultural force of the suburb. In 1961, he characte rized the suburbs of the United States as: a multitude of uniform, unidentifiable houses, lined up inflexibly, at uniform distances, on uniform roads, in a treeless communal wast e, inhabited by people of the same class, the same income, the same age group, witn essing the same television performances, eating the same tasteless prefabricated f oods, from the same freezers, conforming in every respect to a common mold, manufactured in the central metropolis. [In short] the suburban escape in our time is, ironica lly, a low-grade uniform environment from which escape is impossible. (6)

PAGE 21

21 Mumford's critique indicates the costs of suppos edly achieving the American Dream through the suburban way of life. The result was a social cl ass of organization men who were reduced to mere mechanisms of the Amer ican capitalist, cultural regime. Since Mumford's early characterization of the suburb as vacant of cu ltural or intellectual capital, scholars have continued to attack the suburb as a homogenizing force that fo sters a distinctly powerfulbut ultimately deceptiveimage of what it means to be American. Liberal feminists posited a ge ndered critique of the conformi ty of the suburb, specifically attacking the role of housewife it pr oscribed for women. Betty Friedan's The Feminine Mystique published in 1963, describes a widespread dissatisfacti on among suburban women and its expectations of femininity. Freidan explains that many women did not find fulfillment in housework and appliances as popular images of the suburb suggest they should. Instead, the suburb trapped them in roles that prevented th em from maximizing their abilities outside the home. For Friedan and her readers, the separate spheres that the subur bs encouraged did not bring happiness but resulted in feelings of emptiness and despair. Despite the economic prosperity and general optimism, suburban wome n were haunted in their homes (Clapson 130). Observers of suburbia highlight various consequences of a conformist white middle-class that were not made obvious in the promising depi ctions of suburban lifestyles present in print and visual media. Two crucial phenomena emer ge from homogenizing forces of the American suburb, as represented in the sc holarship: the creati on of a private, non-confrontational moral order and the invisibility of whiteness. An overview of the ways in which scholars articulate the moral order and whiteness poses fu rther critiques of suburb and al so leaves gaps that later, revisionist scholars will take up with evidence of suburban diversity.

PAGE 22

22 The loosely connected social environment of suburbia fosters a sense of indifference that is often read by observers as a peaceable lifestyl e. However, scholars such as M.P. Baumgartner and Lorraine Delia Kenny have understood this as moral minimalism, or the avoidance of conflict that is ultimately damaging. M.P. Baumgartner defines moral minimalism in his book, The Moral Order of a Suburb (1988) as an approach in which people prefer the least extreme reactions to offenses and are reluctant to exercise any social control against one another at all (Baumgartner 3). Baumgartners anthropologi cal study of Hampton, a suburb of New York, reveals the extent to which residents keep conflicts privat e, sometimes resolving family problems quietly and internally but most often avoiding them alt ogether (42). Baumgartner concludes that the custom of moral minimalism in the family is transmitted to the larger context of the suburban communities. Thus, a common practice of avoidance and indifference pervades in the American suburb. This perception is congruent with the beli ef that social control is dirty and unpleasant work (130) and so confrontati on is strongly discourag ed. In fact, staying away from an offensive neighbor becomes the naturalized response of reasonable, mature adults (131). Thus, avoidance becomes the norm and a lienation develops among neighbors. Kennys evaluation of moral minimalism in Daughters of Suburbia results from her ethnographic study of eighth grade suburban white girls. She finds their suburban environment encourages a moral minimalism that does not crea te space for critical consciousness about right and wrong, good and bad, but instead provides for the girls only a cursory understanding of their morals and values. For example, a discussion of abortion in class was quickly diverted to the topic of the only non-white students pretty Korean name as oppos ed to her boring American one (23). This functioned as a scapegoat so th at the girls would not have to firmly claim a

PAGE 23

23 position for themselves or discover that they disagr ee with one another. Kenny labels this sort of avoidance as acting white in that they effo rtlessly and unselfconsciously deracialized the norm (25). This small example serves as an indicator for the ways whiteness functions in suburbia as invisible. Congruent with the preference to avoid confrontation in favor of distant but friendly exchange, Kenny finds that suburban whites fail to acknowledge the cultural capital and social privilege their whiteness provides. Whites are pe rceived to be without race in suburbia which allows them to enjoy their priv ilege through various silences, disavowels, and rationalizations (46). Racial identity, unnamed and inexplic able for Kenny's white, middle-class informants, remains powerfully invisible. Also, in the void of real-lif e Others in suburbia, Kenny finds that suburbanites construct imaginary Others in order to stabilize their norma tivity. Media representations of Otherness, in particular, aid in the ability for suburban dwellers to consider questions of race or issues of reproductive rights as some one elses problem. Ke nnys eighth graders believe themselves to be insulated from these issues and as a result, entirely uncritical about them. They take their privilege for granted, Kenny concludes, because nothing about their greenhouse existence forces them to do otherwise. The girls end up leading storyless (normal) lives that cannot account for difference in any productive way (199). Instead, they reproduce the suburban belief that one is simply born white by disavowing differen ce and telling white lies (198). According to Baumgartner's assessment of moral minimalism and Kenny's critical evaluation of the functioning of whiteness in subu rbia, the ways in which suburbanites come to understand their own identities lies in the security of the knowable and the similar. Thus,

PAGE 24

24 through conventions such as moral minimalism a nd invisible whiteness, suburbia can avoid or ignore any challenges to the homogeneous suburban ideal. The analyses of suburban spaces by scholar s such as Mumford, Beauregard, and Kenny argue for the acknowledgment of the individual investment of suburbanites in upholding an image of the suburban American Dream. Political and social ideologies, perceptions (or, in Kennys case absence of perception) about race, and understandings of community are continually and reciprocally formed and info rmed by suburbia. Thus, according to these scholars, suburbia is a uniform environment (Mumford 6) that encourages conformity, upholding white, middle-class, heterosexual family values. It is established not only through tract-housing and legisla tion but by interpersonal practices that perpetuate the ideological distinction between city filth, di versity and deviance and the ideal suburban way of life. In other words, the ideology of suburbia requires willf ul performances that with enough repetition become normalized and thus, the city-s uburb divide becomes naturalized. Revisionist Criti que of Suburbia While m any scholars denounce suburbs as whitewashed wastelands, ot hers counter this characterization by attending to race and class as categories for analyzing suburbia. Suburban scholars who aim to reveal the commonsense image as unrepresentative of the population of the American suburbs have examined specifically Bl acks and the working class. These scholars do not evaluate the moral, cultural or aesthetic valu e of suburb as the critics of conformity did. Most revisionist scholars write at least a generation after Mumford and Whyte and seek to complicate the connection between the image of a conformist suburbia and its experiential counterpart. Drawing from the ra pid rate of diversification of suburbs that began in the 1970s, suburban scholarship also benefited from a theore tical shift toward multiculturalism in the 1980s.

PAGE 25

25 Scholars began to rewrite the history of the Am erican suburb as a place that fostered some diversity, despite overt attempts to prevent it. While the suburbs offered protection from th e crime and random violence prevalent in the city, Black families were subject to racial discrimination and threats there as well. Despite the passage of Title VIII of the Civil Rights Act in 1968, often referred to as the Fair Housing Act, which prohibits racial discrimination in the sale, rental, and financ ing of housing, racial minorities experienced implicit racism as they m oved to the suburbs (Loewen 136). In other words, throughout the 1970s, Blacks were in the suburbs but not of the suburbs (Lake 3). Writing in the early 1980s, Robert C. Lake argue s that race lines were merely replicated in suburban space, which means, at the individua l level, suburbanization for blacks connotes constrained residential choice, a restricted and less efficient housing search process, and limited opportunities for housing equity and w ealth accumulation (239). Revisionist scholars contend w ith the body of scholar ship that that re ifies the suburb as the locus of racism, redlining and intolerance. They also respond to the criticism of conformity to complicate the gap between those become repr esentative of suburbia (the white middle class) and those who also actually liv e there (which includes racial minorities and poor and working class). If contemporary suburbia [is no longer] the stuff of television reruns (Lang 7), then revisionist scholars aim to r econstruct a suburban collective memory that can account for diverse values and priorities (Mattingly 49). Despite redlining and other discriminatory practices intended to keep African Americans and other racial minorities out of the suburbs, members of the Bl ack middle class did begin to migrate there after 1960 (Clapson 82 ). Several factors enabled Bl ack suburbanization. While overflowing city ghettos and decentr alization legislation of urban slums contributed to the push

PAGE 26

26 of African Americans toward suburban spaces, Ci vil Rights activism and African Americans exercise of choice were centra l vehicles for black suburbaniza tion. The suburban aspiration for African Americans functioned sim ilarly to the ways it did for white Americans. Avoiding the city, procuring a house with a garden and re siding in the suburban neighborhood itself were motives for both Blacks and whites who relocate d from urban or rural areas (51). The burgeoning Black middle class sought after the safety, comfort and privacy that suburbia promised. By 1960, nearly 3 million African Americans resided in suburbia. Black families who did settle in suburbia enjoyed many of the a dvantages of suburban life, particularly better schooling, safety, mob ility and social integration. For those who remained in the suburbs and withstood racial discrimination benefited from the opportunities afforded by the suburban way of life. In some cases, government intervention countered discriminatory practices and encouraged Bl ack suburbanization. For example, Chicago implemented the Gatreaux Assisted Housing Pr ogram in 1976 to desegregate housing areas in the city and relocate racial minorities and work ing-class families to the suburbs (Rubinowitz and Rosenbaum 40). Through legislation such as this, the suburban idealin some form became attainable for many Blacks and working-cla ss people that were previously excluded from it. The declining inner city of Chicago made s uburban life seem an attractive alternative. The program offered an escape to suburbia that prom ised to benefit participants' safety, their children's schooling and social relations, and their own job opportunities (54). Revisionist scholarship often tr eats class as a category of anal ysis that is distinct from (yet related to) race. This body of work illustra tes that not all suburban spaces are reserved for middle-class Americans. In fact working-class streetcar and i ndustrial suburbs proliferated by the end of the nineteenth century (Nicolaides and Weise 3). Co mposed mostly of blue collar

PAGE 27

27 workers who labored in nearby factories, these neighborhoods operated communally. Many residents built their own houses, tended vegetable gardens and raised livestock. These efforts allowed them to experience their own ve rsion of the suburban ideal (3). Working-class and lower-income suburbs continued to grow following World War II. (Muller 74). Sociological evidence also points to suburbia as a home to the poor; they are scattered throughout suburban spaces. While th e imagined suburb relies on a firm boundary between middle-class Americans and the poor and work ing class, this is not the lived reality for many suburbanites. The attitudes and values of working-class suburbanites also differ from their more affluent counterparts. They are characte rized by social interaction through local informal groups, a lively street culture th at fosters community cohesiveness, and a lack of aspiration for upward mobility. This portrait of working-cla ss and poor suburban life contrasts sharply the vision of the middle-class suburb which is ster eotypically vacuous of communal relationships and instead driven by materi al gain and consumerism. Taking into consideration the various interventions posited by revisionist scholars, suburban critic Bennett Berger concludes: Clearly then, one suburb (or one kind of suburb) is likely to differ from another not only in terms of the cost of its homes, the in come of its residents, their occupations and commuting patterns, but also in terms of its educational levels, the character of the region, the size of the suburb, the social and geographical or igin of its residents, and countless more indicesall of which, presumably, may be expected to lead to differences in way of life. (39) Revisionist scholars have interven ed at crucial points to counte r the notion that the suburb is a site of white, middle-class conformity and to ch allenge the predominant image that extends from that perception. Indeed, racial minorities live and have lived in suburbia and working-class families have carved out spaces for themselves as well. This critical juncture in suburban scholarship presses for a revisioning of the American suburb as a multicultural and diverse place

PAGE 28

28 that does incorporate various ways of life. It foregrounds the disparity be tween the image of the suburb and its experiential realit y and creates discursive space for exploring further axes of difference that are present there. Searching for Suburbia in Literature As revisionist scholars point out, the subur b that produces robotic Organization Men in gray flannel suits is an incomplete picture. The suburb as a haven for white middle-class families who occupy identical housing and perpetuate a conformist American culture is not the only model of the American suburb. More recent socio-historical eviden ce proves that suburban populations do include working-class and poor Amer icans as well as Blacks and other racial minorities. Despite these historical interventions, the image of a white, middle-class suburb remains hegemonic. Thus, when Bill Bryson recalls his childhood suburb and Richard Bachman illustrates an Ohio neighborhood, each is really c onjuring a representation of suburbia. This representation does not account for diverse racial identities, cl ass backgrounds or gender roles that clearly exist there. Instead, the image of the suburb functions as a literary construction. The whiteness and middle-class status that presumably formulate the foundation of suburbia do not properly reflect demographic information; it is a narrative about the United States and Americanness. As the polemic within suburban discourse demonstrates, this narrative carries considerable cultural consequences. It helps to shape conceptions ab out what it means to be American throughout the twentieth century and into the twenty-first. The image of the white middle-class suburb stands at odds with the more complicated picture posited by revisionist scholars. Because the suburb represents a place that in actuality, is more subtly diverse that the image accounts for, to begin to understand it, we must examine literature.

PAGE 29

29 Literary texts are appropriate places to i nvestigate the already my thologized setting of suburbia and explore the ways auth ors negotiate with its construc tedness. (Price 126). Suburbia offers a lens through which to examine the deta ils of every day suburban life and the meanings and implications for the fictive suburbanites that are involved. From this analytical standpoint, perfunctory activities su ch as mowing the lawn, cleaning the house or helping out a neighbor become politicized; as part of commonsense vision of suburbia, they become part of the larger dialectic about who lives there versus who gets to be represented Thus, a move from historical and sociological scholarship to literary constructions of suburbi a allows observers to tease out the intrinsic complexity and heterogeneity that characterizes the meaning making of suburbanites' lives. Also, the image is a familiar trope, resonating with readers as part of a shared imagined place. Fictive accounts of suburban life can manipulate that commonsense trope to reveal to readers its inherent incongruity. The impulse to look to literature for a br oader understanding of suburbia, for Roger Webster, stems from the fact that suburbia has no history; its archives are empty. There is no depth from which archeology might exhume its artifac ts. (Webster 2). Referring to the critique of suburban conformity, this perspe ctive of suburbia renders it a dept hless and artifici al site that bears little nuance. In an attempt to complicate this prevailing image, Webster locates literature as the primary site for exploring the complexity of the various intersections suburban space, American identities and meaning making. If suburbia signifies the absence of culture, th e lack of aesthetics, th en that very absence of signification becomes a haunting presence (2 ), a paradox Webster tu rns to narrative to explain. Literary representations unmask the si mulacrum of suburbia by using it as a backdrop for which to craft individuality and subjectivity (4). Due to trends in cultural studies and

PAGE 30

30 interdisciplinary scholarship, litera ture about suburbia has shifted fr om an external perspective to an internal one, allowing those inside suburbia define their subjectivities in relation to it rather, as has been traditionally done since the nine teenth century, in opposition to it (3). If we understand suburbia as simultaneously consumer and producer of culture, as Webster suggests, then literature can provide a discursive space in which to understand it. A recent trend of literary representati ons of suburbia is to characteri ze it as a liminal space, drawing attention to the cond ition of in-betweenness reflecting an uncomfortably rootless position ascribed to the suburbs (Lea 141) Narratives can explore more freely the ways people wrestle personally with their feelings of belonging and alienation in suburbia precisely because their constructedness allows for imaginative repres entations and meaning making (141). Scholars from both sociological and historical traditions suggest literature as a place from which to understand racial and class divisi ons that have shaped and been shaped by the image of the American suburb. Revisionist sc holarship discredits the whit e, middle-class suburb ideal by introducing data about the presence of Blacks and working-class families. Thus, the commonsense vision of suburbiaBryson's childhood neighborhood and Bachman's Poplar Street remains cohesive, despite addition of raci al and class minorities into suburban history. Thus, analysis of literary characte rizations of the suburb facilitates an evaluation of the ways the suburb functions as an ideology. Suburbia and Sexuality The im age of suburbia exists as an ideal mark er of American middle-class identity. In order to make a claim for diversity, some scholar s examine the various racial identities, class backgrounds and gender ideologies that challenge the dominant paradigm of white, middle-class, educated family as only desirable model for suburb ia. Scholars have relied on narrative analyses to nuance the critique of suburbi a and provide commentary on the lived experience of life in the

PAGE 31

31 suburbs. However, in this push to complicate an d revise the discourse, sexuality has remained outside the ever-widening focus. While heterosexual family structure is foundational to the suburban ideology, scholars who challenge ot her normative elements of suburbia (that is, whiteness and middle-class status) fail to interroga te the presumption of heterosexuality. The commonsense vision of the suburb relies on heterosexual marriage a nd proscribes distinct roles for women (wife and mother) as well as men (husband, father and breadwinner). Both the critics of conformity and revisionist scholars neglec t to notice that assump tion of heterosexuality functions similarly as that of whitene ss and middle-class status. Discussion of sexuality within suburban disc ourse is limited to a critique of the repressiveness of traditional gender roles se t in place by heterosexual marriage contracts, invoking the suburban impulse to police female sexuality that Fishman describes in 18th century London. For example, Constance Perin indicates sexual activity in suburbia is perceived to disrupt social life, encouraging a fear and silence around sexuality (Perin 173). As Betty Friedan and Dolores Hayden argue, suburbia has served to maintain Victorian noti ons about gender roles and domesticity, shrouding female sexuality with a cloak of privacy. The suburb relies on a foundational rejection of the sexual availability the city facilitates for white women, yet sexuality remains absent as a critical lens through whic h to contest and complic ate the ideal of the American suburb. The gap in the discourse around female (het ero)sexual desire also calls for further interrogation into other deviat ions from the norm. Lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender identities are instances of se xual deviance that remain unacknowledged by suburban scholars. Queer studies scholars, many drawing from litera ry traditions, advocate a central focus on sexual desire and deviance as well as queer sexualities and identities.

PAGE 32

32 Queer sexualities are often perceived as bel onging in the city. Urban spaces have not only been locations for female heterosexual devi ance, but are also largely conceptualized as meccas for queer sexualities. The belief that the cosmopolitan city supplies a haven for queer identities and desires is evidenced by Judith Ha lberstam's admission that she, too, uncritically conceived of urban space as progressive and fr iendly to queers as opposed to rural spaces that were backward and dangerous pl aces to conduct queer lives. In a Queer Time and Place explores Halberstam's own biases regarding the urban-rural divide and interrogates the pervasiveness of the con cept of metronormativity that, in her analysis, reveals the conflation of 'urban' and 'visible' as opposed to rural and cl oseted (36). She attends to the ways in which rural spaces are perceived as clos ets that are characterized as hostile environments for queer identities. Halberstam discusses specifically the urbanrural divide because she is concerned with the life story and media representations of Brandon Teena, however the suburb aligns ideologically on the side of the rural in this case. Lawrence Knopp points out the portrayal of gentrified gay neighborhoods such as San Fran cisco's Castro district as centres of hedonism and self-indulgence, of other gay entertainment areas (such as San Francisco's South-of-Market) as dangerous sadomasochistic underworlds, of red-light districts as threatening to 'family values', of non-white neighborhoods as centres of rape, or alternatively, of suburbs as places of blissful monogamous (and patriarchal) heterosexuality. (193) Scholarship about queer identities and desires ha s centered on urban spaces primarily because of the institutional representation and visibility of ten available there. However, as Halberstam, Knopp and other scholars ar gue, cities are not the only viable spaces where queer identities are carried out and they are not the quintessential refuge from suburban heteronormativity. Also, as discussed earlier in this chapte r, the perceived proper natural and desirable orientations of space emphasize individual spaces, divided livi ng quarters, homeownership and

PAGE 33

33 the unblemished lawn, free from weeds, dandeli ons, dog feces or planted tires (Perin 31) as symbolic achievement of the American Dream. Implicit in that articulation is the heterosexual family. For example, Delores Hayden remarks on the myriad ways domestic spaces come to shape womens natural roles as wives and mother s. The negation of fema le sexual desire and its ideological relegation to marriage and moth erhood leaves the image of suburban housewife steadfast in the American vision of the suburb. Certainly, the lack of atte ntion to queer sexuality in suburban scholarship also speaks to the ways queers have been discounted as sexual deviants and precluded from active participation in the American suburban imaginary and instead perceived as belonging in and shaped by urban filth. While revisionist scholars sought to comp licate the picture of the American suburb by introducing evidence of Blacks, working-class a nd poor people that have called suburbia home since its inception, the axis of sexual diversity remains invisible. He terosexuality stands unchallenged by suburban critics from both sides of the polemic resulting in a further reified norm. In response to this oversight in the discourse, I invoke queer studies scholarship and introduce sexuality as a category of analysis for understanding the construction of the suburb in Jeffrey Eugenides' novels. Because sexuality inex tricably informs constr uctions of race, class and gender, previous disregard for it results in an incomplete chal lenge and critique to the image of suburbia. Employing an inte rsectional model that accounts fo r a multiplicity of simultaneous identities (race, class, gender, sexuality, and nation) will effect a more nuanced reading of The Virgin Suicides and Middlesex and open larger questions about how the suburban image functions as a regulator of sexuality.

PAGE 34

34 CHAPTER 3 THE THREAT OF FEMALE HETEROSEXUAL DESIRE IN THE VI RGIN SUICIDES Containment and protection of female heterosexual desire motivated members of the white middle class to relocate to suburban spa ces since the eighteenth century. As Robert Fishman illustrates, the foundation for the ideolo gical construction of the suburb as a morally superior alternative to the indus trialized city rests on the percei ved necessity to confine white bourgeois women in order to ensure their sexual purity. Defined in binary opposition to the city, the twentieth-century American suburb is inte rpolated through advertisements, print and televisual media, fiction and so cio-historical schola rship as the realization of the American Dream. While suburban discourse complicates the ideology of s uburb as a sexual refuge through explorations of race and class, it is integral to recognize the ge ndered implications for the suburb that originate in industrializing Victorian London because it is within this tradition Jeffrey Eugenides situates his articulation of late tw entieth-century American female sexuality in The Virgin Suicides. Eugenides constructs an unnamed suburb of De troit as the backdrop for the explanation and critique of the suburb's inhe rent repression of female hetero sexual desire. The decision to leave the suburb unidentified invites two congrue nt interpretations. First, the setting of The Virgin Suicides recalls the Detroit suburb in which Euge nides grew up (Callado-Rodriguez 37). Second, the anonymity of the suburb allows it to stand in as the prototypical suburb, simultaneously ideologically pervasive yet impossibl e to define in certain terms. Furthermore, the city of Detroit carries significant symbolic meaning: As the literal en gine of progress for the twentieth century, Detroit represents the heart of socioeconom ic American culture, the hub of industry for which the suburbs act as a fortifying mechanism and i dyllic shelter for the achievers of the American Dream (Womack and Mallory-K ani 165). Eugenides draws from the cultural

PAGE 35

35 legacy of Detroit as a location in which industr ial development had a close and early link with suburbanization (Kenyon 3). Cultural historian of Detroit Amy Maria Kenyon recognizes the significance of Detroit to the histor y of suburbia but she explicitly de nies that its suburbs stand as a universal model (3). However Eugenides disagrees. He commen ts, Detroit, to my mind, is one of the very important American cities, wh ere things happened that are emblematic of American history: the rise of the auto industr y, the race riots of 1967. In addition, lots of culture has come out of Detroit (qtd. in Schiff 114). Detroit also is a notorious center for poverty, crime, pollution and other filth, an exaggerated space from which to elucidate the city/suburb binary. Thus, the effect of allowing the specific location of The Virgin Suicides to remain nameless precipitates a reading of the novel as addressing the condition of suburbia as both specific to Detroit a nd also indicative of larg er cultural implications. Within this context, Eugenides emerges as a suburban author, situating his narratives first The Virgin Suicides and later, Middlesex within the same socio-historical moment of 1970s suburban Detroit. He invokes a rich history of industrialization, Ford factories, immigration, racial tension and economic decline. The suburb features significantly in The Virgin Suicides forcing the reader to contend with it as Eugenides presents it. It is suburbia that Eugenides seeks to critique and he does so by intervening in the image of the American suburb with instances of deviant sexual desire. The effect is an unravelin g of an image that is tied to an existing place with a narrative of its own: an actualalbeit unnamedsuburb of Detroit. Another function of the nameless setting for The Virgin Suicides is the distance it creates between Eugenides' own childhood on which he draw s in order to create the setting for the novel (qtd. in Schiff 112). In order to launch a meani ngful and poignant critique of the place he comes from, Eugenides must establish a buffer between his lived experience and the fictive one in the

PAGE 36

36 novel. Forcing a gap between himself and the suburb creates discursive space from which he can critique an ideal with which he is intimately familiar. The unnamed suburb coupled with the collective narrator that tells the story retrospectiv ely form a rhetorical duality of the author's distance and proximity to the subject of the novelthe suburb. As a result, Eugenides writes from a well-informed, reliable position to launch a nuanced, careful critique of the American suburb. This question of distance/proximity will recur later in chapter regarding the discussion of the narrators. In The Virgin Suicides Eugenides introduces the narrative of the five Lisbon girls who, as is foreshadowed by the title and revealed in the opening pages of the novel, escape suburbia via suicide. Narrated by a collec tive group of adult men who liv ed nearby the girls as youth, The Virgin Suicides memorializes the death of the Lisbon gi rls by recounting the events during the year between the attempt of the first sister, Cecilia, and the su bsequent suicides of the four remaining girls. The narrators trace the simulta neous deterioration of their neighborhood in an attempt to elucidate both the cause and the conse quence of the tragic lo ss of the virginal yet desirous adolescent girls. They embark on an obsessive journey to capture the memory of the Lisbon girls, piecing together vari ous source materials in order to speculate about the motivation for their suicide. A tension emerges between Detroit and the suburb in which the Lisbon girls serve as a metonym for the sexualized filth of the city that threatens to corrupt and unmask the illusory suburb. This tension is revealed by the various moments in the text in which suburbanites willfully ignore the c itys presence, choosing to reinte rpret its warning signs or to not acknowledge them at all. An analysis of the ways the narrators re construct the memory of the Lisbon girls distills three di stinct methods suburba nites employ in order to perpetuate the suburban image: repression, restoration and misr ecognition. First, Mrs. Lisbon (in addition to

PAGE 37

37 other implicit forces) functions as the repressive guardian over her daughters' sexualities by containing both their desires and their bodies under suffocating le vels of surveillance. Second, they counter the denigration of the Lisbon home th at occurs alongside the grieving process of the family over their loss of Cecilia by cleaning up any visual reminders of instability or deviance. Restoration of the home, the lawn and the neighb orhood figures centrally in the suburb's effort to define itself as a beacon of purityboth sexual and social. Fi rst, suburbanites in the novel continually misrecognize indicators of city presence in their ne ighborhood and inst ead reinterpret or ignore them. In each of th ese instances, suburbanites in The Virgin Suicides choose to ignore the looming presence of Detroit, resulting in an overall schema of willfulyet unacknowledgedlabor performed in order to main tain the ideological boundary between city and suburb. The novel opens with a sense of nostalg ia for a suburban neighborhood that was once idyllic. The narrators introduce their first piece of many pieces of evidence they collect in their memorial of the Lisbon girls. Labeled Exhibi t #1, a snapshot of the Lisbon home, taken by a real estate agent prior to Cec ilia's first suicide attempt suggest s a recent suburban past that existed harmoniously with the image of the Amer ican suburb (5). Described as a comfortable suburban home the Lisbon house was once a prototype of suburban life in a time when the slate roof had not yet begun to sh ed its shingles, the porch was st ill visible above the bushes, and the windows were not yet held together with strips of masking tape (5). The photograph illustrates that at one point, prior to the suicides of the Lisbon girls, life in this suburb of Detroit was stable, even happy. At the very least, life was normal. The photograph is tattered, an indication th at the suburban status quo represented there exists only as a faded memory. The image conjured by the picture is reminiscent of

PAGE 38

38 uninterrupted, pristine lives previously carried out in th e Lisbons' neighborhood but also representative of an extra-dieg etic longing for an American way of life that the suburb no longer delivers. The photograph foreshadows the declin e of both the Lisbon home and the suburb, but also recognizes the necessity fo r the boys to retrace their subu rban histories and recover the memory of a suburb that would otherwise be lo st. Thus, the novel attends, from the beginning, to the competing narratives about the Lisbon girls and the suburb: th e sterilized, nearly forgotten story that the suburb selectively tells and the retelling by the narrators that complicates and contradicts it. An analysis of the various ways suburbanites (fail to) resp ond to the suicides of the Lisbon girls illustrates the na turalized labor required by the pare nts of the suburb to maintain an illusion of an enclosed, regulated space. Th e arduous efforts of the na rrators to reconstruct the past of their childhood suburb, then, reveals their own awareness that the suburb of their parent's generation is a fiction, and while they are complicit in th e reproduction of that fiction, their consciousness of it is, in a small way, also a critique. Policing Female Sexuality: Repressi on of the Lisbon Girls' Desire Eugenides demonstrates the va rious ways the suburbanites in The Virgin Suicides work vigorously to maintain the illusion that their suburb is a safe haven for white middle-class families, defined against the filth and deviance of the city. Their efforts are foregrounded through the active repressi on of the sexuality of Lisbon girls. As discussed in the previous chapter, suburbia hinges upon the control of fema le sexuality, confini ng women to reproductive roles of wife and mother while denying them sexual agency. The suburb in general, but also Mrs. Lisbon specifically, work diligently to ensure the sexuality of the Lisbon girls is controlled because they have a vested interest in the girls virginity. Their suburban imaginary depends on the repression of female sexual de sire and thus, must be policed.

PAGE 39

39 Mrs. Lisbon is the key guardian of her daughters sexualities. Characterized by the neighbors as embodying queenly iciness, she mon itors the girls bodies for signs of make-up and forbids revealing clothing (8). She assemb les homemade dresses that desexualize the girls with their low hems and bagginess and attest to thei r virginity with the accents of lace. Kenneth Womack and Amy Mallory-Kani describe the Lisbon parents as jostled by fears of the rampant promiscuity sometimes desired by pubescent girl s en route to sexual maturity, [and so they] inhibit excessive amounts of social interaction between their daught ers and others in their age bracket of the opposite sex (169). Despite Mrs. Lisbons continued efforts to conceal and the girls bodies from the eyes of adolescent boys, the narrators are fascinated by their beauty. Throughout the novel, the narrators serve as voyeurs, observing the gi rls obsessively while always awar e that the girls were out of their reach, unattainable and impe netrable. They comment, whenever we got a glimpse [of the girls], their faces looked indecently revealed, as though we were used to seeing women in veils (8). Despite this intense obsession with the Lisbon girls, they cannot locat e its origin or explain its significance, even ye ars later as adults. Cecilia's psychiatrist, Dr. Hornicker, offers one explanation for her condition following her initial suicide attempt. He concludes her suicide was an act of a ggression inspired by the repression of adolescent libidinal urges (21). Dr. Hornicker suggests to Mr. and Mrs. Lisbon that they relax their rules and permit the gi rls to interact with boys their own age (21). Momentarily, they reform their restrictive polic ies. Not only did they allow boys allowed to enter the house for the first time (22), but th ey also hosted a chaperoned party to which many neighborhood boys received invitations (24).

PAGE 40

40 The party exists in the boys' memory as a dis tinct turning point for th e Lisbon girls. They recall that as guests nerv ously congregate in the basement, Cecili a excuses herself from the party. She climbs upstairs and leaps from a window ont o the fence. Mrs. Lisbon, recognizing that temporary relaxation of her stringent rules on ly pushed Cecilia over the edge, responds by intensifying the isolation of the remaining four girls. For most of the summer of Cecilias suicide, the girls remain inside, lo cked away from outside influence. They return to school in the fall, but are barred from any extracu rricular activities and do not soci alize with their peers. They stand as a unified body in the memory of the narrators, moving through the hallways of the school almost as if they were apparitions. The narrators recall various sightings of the Lisbon girls who merged into general image of ski rts growing transparent in the light and who would vanish if followed (100). The elusiveness of the Lisbon girls piques the interest of the neighborhood boys. The more Mrs. Lisbon isolated the girls, the more curious the boys became. One classmate of the girls, Trip Fontaine, ta kes particular interest in Lux and convinces Mr. and Mrs. Lisbon to allow him and his friends to take Lux and her sisters to the Homecoming dance. At the dance, each Lisbon girl experien ce their new social freedom differently, but Luxs actions bring about the most seve re consequences for the girls. Crowned Homecoming King and Queen, Trip and Lux sneak out of the dance, away from the surveillance of Mr. Lisbon and escapes to the football field. Trip confesses later to the narrators that jus t got sick of her right then and leave her to find her own way home (138). When Lux arrives home hours after curfew, Mrs. Lisbon is listening to church music, the kind of music they play when you die while she Lisbon disciplines her daughter (135). The music fo reshadows the suicides of the remaining Lisbon girls, but more immediately the death of the newly experienced social freedom they each had tasted that evening.

PAGE 41

41 Luxs disobedience leads Mrs. Lisbon to s hut the house in maximumsecurity isolation (141). She forces the girls to withdraw from sc hool, explaining that it was her motherly duty to shelter them from boys while th ey continued to mourn Cecilia s death (142). The control she exerts on the girls sexualities through shapeless clothing and ex treme isolation exemplifies the level of labor required to plug up the cracks in the suburban my th. Mrs. Lisbon functions in the novel primarily as the guardian of her daughters sexuality. Her obligation as suburban mother is to contain female sexual desire and ensure it is only expressed thr ough the proper avenues of heterosexual marriage and motherhood. Thus, th e Lisbon home transforms into a metaphorical bunker, with canned goods piled up in the basement When Mr. Lisbon resigns from his position at the school, no one entered or left the home. The narrators recall a distinct odor emanating from the house that smelled of decay and rot but also contained too much syrup to be death itself (165). Despite the enormous pressure to remain c ontentedly contained in their home, the Lisbon girls resist in subtle ways. Therese transcended her suburba n isolation by communicating in Morse code through the genderless, nationless medium of a hand radio with an unidentified person in Columbia. The girls experienced the wo rld outside their suburb an prison through travel catalogs. Lux, in particular, rebelled against he r imprisonment, participating in clandestine sex acts with working-class boys on the roof. Mrs. Lisbon put forth her best efforts to contain her daughters sexualities, yet they found ways to imagine themselves out of their prison. Even extreme isolation away from any potential threat of corruption (in school, c hurch, extra-curriculars, etc.), Mrs. Lisbon cannot suffocate the girls desires entirely. They surface anyway, reve aling Mrs. Lisbons efforts to be in vain.

PAGE 42

42 However, Eugenides shows that these mild acts of resistance were insufficient and suggests that the Lisbon girls coul d never truly become agents of their own sexuality within the confines of their suburb. Therese communicated her frustration with the constraints of her suburban life, telling her date at the Homecoming dance: we just want to live. If anyone would let us (132). Suicide offe red the only escape from isolati on for the Lisbon girls. They invite the boys to witness the final moments of their struggle as they imagine together escaping to Florida to start new lives. However, that fantasy is overshadowed by the girls plans for suicide. While they are able to imagine a place where they can exis t outside the confines of their suburb, they can never get there and are le ft only with the opti on of suicide. The repression of female sexualityand the resulting suicides necessitates other forms of labor Because the suicides of the Lisbon girl s signals an escape from th e repressive forces of suburbia, even more labor is required to sustain the image of the suburb. De spite the fact that the Lisbon girls challenge the subur ban status quo, the neighborhood re sponds collectively in order to ensure the image of their subu rb remains outwardly stable. Thei r labor exists on a larger scale than that of Mrs. Lisbon; while policing fema le sexuality forms the core of suburban labor, covering up any deviance requires a group effort. Keeping up Appearances: Restoration of the Home and the Suburb Mrs. Lisbon's failure to repress sexuality successfully (which is first unmasked by Cecilia's suicide) speaks to a larger ineptitude of the suburb to sustain a haven for white women. As Chapter One indicated, exterior maintenance of the suburban home reflects upon the stability of those who inhabit it. In other words, a deteriorating home evidences a crumbling moral standard within itan indication that the subur b as a whole, has faile d to live up to its own image. Thus, the neighborhood in The Virgin Suicides steps in and performs the necessary labor that the Lisbons do not. In this way, Eugeni des emphasizes the amount of willful labor the

PAGE 43

43 suburbanites exert in constructing and mainta ining their id eological suburb by foregrounding their obsessive impulse to restore the deteriorating Lisbon home. Following Cecilias initial suicide attemp t and continuing until Mr. and Mrs. Lisbon move out, the Lisbons neglect to perform the prope r upkeep of their home. In an effort to erase the evidence of the deviant behavior that has plagued their subur b, the Lisbons' neighbors combine efforts to maintain the exterior of thei r home. Some neighbors, the boys report, are not concerned by Cecilias suicide but focus their a ttention instead on the potential threat the fence on which she jumped to her death posed for others A team of men, in a self-serving neighborly favor, attempt to remove the fence free of char ge. (53). They cannot do it themselves and solicit the help of a tow truck, assuming the Lisbons would be grateful. Mr. Lisbon acknowledges the labor with a salute and the neighbors return to their own lives, their obligation fulfilled. Mr. Bates did some edging [and] Mrs. Hessens humped back dove and surfaced amid her swelling rosebushes as she sprayed (56) A sense of normalcy returns momentarily to the suburb. Since everythingaside from an unsightly trench where the fence used to be appears to be in its place once again, suburbanites can return to their imaginary peaceful space. Tidy outward appearance reflects a stable intern al structure and so the Lisbons' neighbors insist upon a return to normalcy by removing the reminder of Cecilias suicide. The suburb unites at other points to clean up the Lisbon home. Following Cecilias death, the house receded behind its mists of youth being choked off, and even our [the narrators'] own parents began to mention how dim and unhealthy the place looked (145). Mr. Lisbon fails to manicure his lawn as well. (85) Parents complain to the headmaster of the school about the worsening condition of the Li sbon house, combining to form a chorus of disapproval (162). They believe that Mr. Lisbon 's lack of attention to his home indicates a

PAGE 44

44 related inability to run his ow n family (162). In other words, an unkempt suburban home represents an unkempt suburban life. In their co ntinued efforts to mask any signs of symbolic filth in their midst, the nei ghbors try to clean up the Lisbons literal filth, hoping that helping them to maintain a front of stability woul d reaffirm for them the imaginary suburb. The neighborhood's response to the army of fish flies that descend upon their homes and die reveals their obsessive impulse to resist filth in their midst. The narrators wonder what got into us that year or what we hated so intensely the crust of de ad bugs over our lives (56). In another collective effort, suburbani tes scrape the veneer of insects from their homes, mailboxes and swimming pools, and tackle the Lisbon house at the end. The narra tors notice the Lisbon house is coated with more bugs than the others walls an inch thick as they sweep their house and bag up fallen tree limbs (57). The suburb ritualizes these processes of restoration, as exemplified by the narrators' account of the neighborhood's annual weekend of l eaf raking. The language Eugenides employs to describe the event conjures images of ca maraderie and triumph. Th e neighbors perform the raking in military ranks, each ac cumulating leaf piles according to their own unique style (91). Raking delivers pleasure [they] felt all the way to [their] bowels. Sometimes the pleasure was so keen [they] raked up the grass itself, leavi ng patches of dirt (91). Having mastered the decaying remnants of nature on their front lawns, the neighbors conclude their ritual by stepping back and admiring their labor (91). This sort of ritualized re storation resonates with sociohistorical accounts of suburban homes and lawn s attest to the neighborly duty of properly maintaining the exterior of one's home in order to project an image of stability and cleanliness. Mr. Lisbon, a usually lone but faithful participan t in the suburban ritu al, failed to rake his yard in the fall following Cecilia's suicide. This time the neighbors do not feel compelled to

PAGE 45

45 compensate for Mr. Lisbon's transgression and leave the leaves to pile up and get soggy, making the Lisbon lawn look like a field of mud (93). His inability to perform the proper labor that maintains a united suburban front further reflect s his ineptitude to head his household. The leaves symbolize the tarnishing effect that the deterioration of the Lisbon home has on the suburb in general; they creep into other, well-kept yards, agita ting the neighbors who upheld their duties. The image of suburbia suffers from the single bl emish of the Lisbon house, which explains the neighbors' first impulse to assist the Lisbons in removing the fence and the fish flies and then their irritation when Mr. Lisbon can not fulfill his oblig ations on his own. The Lisbons fail to contain the sexuality of their daughters within the private space of their home, the first signal of deviance in suburbia. As a result, they cannot maintain the outward appearance of stability, unable to perform the necessary duti es required for acceptance in suburbia. While neighborhood attempts to cove r for the Lisbons' transgression from suburban norms, they eventually conclude that the Lisbons are not capable of keeping up appearances and consequently do not warrant suburban membership. This sense that those who are not worthy of enjoying the privileges suburbia has to offer, and thus do not belong there, suggests that an alternative space where they do be long exists: the city. The Lisbons' inability to enact the suburban fiction disqualifies them from claiming residence there, as if to suggest that anything that does not neatly fit into th e image of the suburb should bea nd almost always iscontained outside the suburban boundaries. Eugenides articulates the American perception of city and suburb as existing in binary opposition; the ne ighborhood's willingness to assist the Lisbons only to a certain point reifies their beli ef that the distinction between these spaces is impermeable. Thus, it allows them to overlook the evidence of the city in their midst that the narrators signal to

PAGE 46

46 throughout the text. The next se ction foregrounds this labor of purposeful misrecognition, as it constitutes the most encompassing layer of labor suburbia performs. Misrecognition of City Filth in Suburbia Eugenides exemplifies the ways suburbani tes misrecognize the pres ence of Detroit in their midst through the narrators' reconstruc tion of their childhood s uburb from an adult perspective. Their retrospectiv e approach to the suburb allows Eugenides to distinguish between the narrators' understanding of its re lationship to Detroit and that of their parents. This temporal distance serves as a narrative strategy to establ ish an ideological distance between the narrators and their childhood suburb. Eugenides can then a llow them to comment somewhat critically on a space that so intimately informed their adoles cent understanding of the world. Out of the narrators' retelling of their yout h through simultaneous lenses of distance and proximity emerges the most subtle, but also the most precarious fo rm of labor performed in novel: misrecognition of city presence in suburbia. The narrators themselves neve r visit the city as boys, onl y observing it from the rooftop, hearing sounds [they] usually c ouldnt hear sounds of the impoverished city [they] never visited, all mixed and muted, without sense, ca rried on a wind from that place (345). For them, the city was a place only partially reflect ed in the setting sun light through the haze and smog emitted from the factories. The occasional shouts (34), gunshots (36) or passing freighters (208) comprised a murmuring soundtrack of city life that the boys kne w nothing about and their parents chose to actively overlook. As a result of the vast ideological dist ance from Detroit, suburbanites could ignore aspects of city life that did not directly affect their daily life. For example, not until Cecilias death did the town reco gnize the strike of cemetery workers occurring in Detroit. The boys explain their ignorance: we didnt think it affected us (36). However, the narrators recognize

PAGE 47

47 that the city looms much closer to the suburb than the suburb is willing to acknowledge. From their roof view, the boys could s ee the abrupt demarcation wher e the trees ende d and the city began (34), suggesting the insulation from the crime, poverty and other filth of the city is actually an imaginary buffer. Suburbanites insisted, however, that the city is distinct and distant from their neighborhood, defining themselves against the filth it represented. For ex ample, the narrators mention that the Mrs. Woodhouse, the headmasters wife, commutes to Detroit to volunteer with inner city children in the Head Start program. While an inconsequential detail to the overall narrative, the relationship between Mrs. Woodhouse and Detroit reveals two suburban assumptions: first, life in suburbia is in order and the children ther e have no need for a Head Start program; and second, city children have something to gain from the influence a white middleclass suburban woman can exert over them in her spare time. Eugenides offers this detail to provide insight into the ways Mrs. Woodhouse (a nd her neighbors) constructs an ideological divide between herself and the co rruption of the city. They actively work toward maintaining the ideological boundary of their subur b in order reaffirm their position of privilege over the less fortunate city dwellers. Implicit in this metana rrative is the demonstration of moral superiority of Mrs. Woodhouse over racial and class others that inhabit crime-ridden, unregulated city spaces. Her relationship to the city reinforces the necessity for insulating white, middle-class, heterosexual women (and their children) from the city environment than engenders troubled, atrisk youth. The fact that she moves freely be tween suburb and city does not diminish the effectiveness of the suburb as a refuge for female sexuality. Rather, her role as mentor to city children intensifies the moral distinction between family life in the cityclearly in turmoiland stable healthy familial relations that the suburb makes possible.

PAGE 48

48 Another instance of choosing to look away from the evidence of the city in the suburbs that contributes to active perpetuation of the subur ban ideology occurs in the incidental treatment of racial others. As Lisbon girls and their Homecoming dates cruise through their suburb, enjoying their sole brief moment of social freedom, they pass a black maid on every corner, waiting for the bus. No one in the car notices them They fade into the suburban landscape as if they dont exist. However, the narrators' retros pective recognition of the presence of black maids serve as a reminder both that the city is only a workers commute away from the suburb and that city residents can and do perm eate the suburbs tree-lined border on a daily basis The children in the car overlook this reality, thus fortif ying the illusion of the impenetrable suburb. The narrator's cognizance of the existence of the black maids signals a development in consciousness from childhood to adulthood. The young people in the car replicate the impulse of their parents, that is, to ignore the maids altogether. The narrat ors, speaking from the position of a generation later, do see the black maids, which is markedly different from their parents perception. However, their retell ing of this scene does not acknow ledge the implications of the intimate inter-racial, cross-class relationships ma de possible by the presence of black maids in a white middle-class suburb. The narrators may see the maids, but they do not recognize them as breaches in the suburban image or evidence of the functioning reciprocal relationship between city and suburb. The distinction between the unquestioned performance of misrecognition on the part of the narrators' parents and the conscious but comp licit attitude the narrators embrace is heightened by the discussion about their lack of experience in the city. Th e narrators characterize their relationship to a Detroit theyd never been to by stating: Occasionally we heard gunshots coming from the ghetto but our fathers insisted in was only cars backfiring (36). The narrators,

PAGE 49

49 looking back on the situation through the lens of adulthood, are cogni zant of the disparity between the real presence of gunshots and their fath ers repackaging of the story to fit within the fictive suburb they perceived. However, they on ly understand the implications of this to the degree that they know the sounds were gunshots, not exploding engines. They do not see their fathers deceptions as attempts to convince them selves of the protection and safety their suburb offered. The narrators accept a certa in level of dishonesty as ineff ectual. Violence and crime are associated with the city and thus out side the concern of suburbanites. Eugenides comments on the irony of the illuso ry divide between city and suburb with the discussion of the cemetery strike. Prior to Ce cilia's death, no one had ever died in the boys suburb and consequently, they lacked any knowledge about or experience with cemeteries. Thus, there was no reason to know that city cemetery workers were on strike until Cecilia commits suicide and the Lisbon family realizes their suburb' s cemetery is full. The narrators excuse their neighborhoods ignorance of the strike, stating they didnt think it affected [them] (36). While most neighbors attend the funeral held in the city, parents leav e the boys at home to protect [them] from the contamination of tragedy (38). This paper later addresses the question of the suburb's effort to disavow tragedy, but in this in stance, parents intend to protect their sons from another type of contamination: the city. By preventing the boys from entering the city parents can protect the boys from the ills of Detroit and perpetuate the illusion of the suburb's detachment from it. Ironically, the cemetery stri ke serves as another announcement of Detroit's presence in suburban space in that it effects real consequences for Cecilia's funeral. Attendees are further confronted by the city at the funeral service when t he hearse had trouble getting through the gate because of the picketing of cemetery workers (38) However, the incident is

PAGE 50

50 dismissed, buried in the back pages of the ne ighborhood newspaper and kept secret from the boys. The suburbanites misrecognition or avoidance of the city's presence in various contexts allows Eugenides to elucidate the extent to which a sort of false consciousness is perpetuated in suburbia. These details of suburban life are normalized, neutralized, and ultimately, unrecognizable as evidence of city filth. Even as adults who cri tique suburbia at various points in the book, the narrators are complicit with the pe rpetuation of the imaginary suburb. However, they are distinct from the suburban generation th at preceded them because they notice the black maids and understand their father's dishonesty. Thei r retelling of the narra tive that includes these details serves as a mechanism through which E ugenides can call attention to the disparity between the suburb of their parent s' and their own understanding of it. In this gap, Eugenides launches his critique of the uncritical complic ity that the suburban ideology requires. The clearest example of suburbias efforts to di stance itself from city life is in the towns response to the Lisbon girls deaths. The Catholic Church documents all the girls suicides as accidents, a term that circumvents any questions of causality (37). The local newspaper neglects to run an article on [Cecilias] suicide attempt because the editor, Mr. Baubee, felt such depressing information wouldnt fit between the fr ont-page article on the J unior League Flower Show and the back-page photographs of grinning brides (14). Even Mrs. Lisbon refused to acknowledge any calamity as neighbors drop by to express polite sympathy (17). Neighbors also delay sending flowers follo wing Cecilias second, successful suicide attempt while they decided whether to let the catastrophe pass in silence or to act as though the death were natural (42). Confronting the reality of suicide is not an option for them. Instead, they struggle

PAGE 51

51 to repackage it as an accident, an aberration that does not disrupt the subu rban status quo and can fade quietly into suburban memory. The suburb encourages the Lisbon girls to al so conceal any outward signs of disruption caused by Cecilia's death and to continue their da ily lives as if unaffect ed. Their school does sponsor a Day of Grieving so as to dedicate appr opriate time for the Lisb on girls and their peers to process their loss. However rather than invoking the memory of Cecilia, the day aims to address grief in general so that tragedy was diffused and univers alized (104). These strategies allow suburbanites to politely dodge the questions about why C ecilia chose suicide and avoid any indictment of the suburban way of life. Th e suburb collectively repackages Ceclia's suicide as an accident and then quickly dismisses it wit hout further interrogation. Thus, she fades into memory not as a rupture in the homeostatic suburb an fiction, but as an un fortunate incident of little consequence. Conclusion The boys recount the story of the Lisbon girls decades after their deat hs. As adults, the narrators continue to piece toge ther the meanings and implicati ons of the suicides, cataloging pictures and interviews into an archive of exhi bits. They spend their lives obsessed with the girls, fantasizing about them even in the comp any of their wives. They are each haunted by shadows of the Libsons, exerting an enormous effort on what might have been the fingerprinting of phantoms that ex ist only in their imaginary (187). The narrators laborious endeavor of uncove ring and sustaining the memory of the Lisbon girls mirrors the willful efforts of the suburbanites to maintain and perpetuate the illusion of a stable and pristine suburb. Eugenides foregrounds the sexuality of the Lisbon girls as the lens through which the suburban myth is revealed to be cracked and permeable. The boys desperate attempts to cling to a memory of beautiful, virgin al, desirous girls is a way for Eugenides to call

PAGE 52

52 attention to the lengths to which people will go to convince themselves their illusion is reality. The narrators recognized the Lis bon girls as human beings at one fleeting moment in the text, while they are on the Homecoming dates with Trip and his friends. Kevin Head is shocked to notice [the Lisbon girls] weren t all that different from [his] sister (123). However, the narrators dismiss this revelation and continue to se arch for a Rosetta stone to provide insight into their mysterious lives (170). At the end of the novel, the narrators reveal that their childhood suburb had recently been razed to put up a subdivision (245). In other words, the very suburb Eugenides has shown to be an illusion, a figment of its residents imaginations, is dest royed and replaced with a fresh version, a new set of homogenous housing, tiny saplings, and most importantly, no memory of the Lisbon girls. While the narrators struggle to sharpen their percep tion of their suburban landscape, looking to the Lisbon girls for inspiration and expl anation, they too are caught up within the suburban imaginary. However, thei r primary function is to foreground the intense labor required to maintain an illusion, to convince one self that the illusion is reality, and then to conduct daily life accordingly. The desperate im pulse of the boys to invest so much of themselves into memorializing the Lisbon girls ma rks a subtle, yet importa nt distinction between their view of the suburb and that of their parents. The subdi vision that replaces the Lisbons' suburb is outwardly the same, a re plication of white, middle-class, heteronormativity. However, as the narrators show throughout the novel, this subdivision is characterized by a consciousness of the fictive suburb, and while its residents (the narrators included) are complicit in its replication, they are indeed awar e of its illusory qualities. Eugenides focuses on the girls sexuality specifically, because as suburban discourse points out, female sexuality is supposed to be cont ained and the suburb has historically been the

PAGE 53

53 place where it is kept safe and secure. The Lisbon gi rls acts of resistance that culminate in their suicide reveals the failure of the suburb to comp letely repress female sexuality. However, the reiteration of suburbia in th e form of a new subdivision, signals to the insistence upon perpetuating the myth that in fact, suburbia can ex ist in a vacuum, away from city deviance. By razing one suburb only to build a subdivision, the memory of the Lisbon girls is erased and the evidence of the cracks between th e city and the suburb can bealm ostcompletely discarded. The narrators point of view, characteri zed by their simultaneous distance from and proximity to their childhood subur b, allows them to pr esent a negative portra it of the American suburb. They stand both as observers and critics of the cultural forces of their suburb that resulted in the death of the Lisbon girls. But they are also characters of the novel that function to leverage Eugenides' critique of the suburbs as well. Eugenides positions the narrators between himself and the unnamed suburb in which presumab ly he grew up in order to rupture his own proximity to the suburb. He removes himself from the narrative, criticizin g it from the outside. As a result, The Virgin Suicides concludes with disdain for the American suburb of the 1970s, but also suggests that it has underg one a slight transformation in th e lifetime of the narrators (and of Eugenides). In other words, the novel's reso lution allows the reader to imagine an outside of suburban normsone in which the narrators a nd Eugenides both report from. While this outside is only subtly different from its prede cessor, it is indeed an improved and self-conscious version of its former suburban self. The distance Eugenides establishes fro m the suburb about which he writes in The Virgin Suicides sets up a template for further critique in Middlesex, his second novel that also takes place in suburban Detroit. Middlesex intensifies the connection be tween the suburb and the city as it historicizes the cultural moment of 1970s De troit and its suburb, Gro sse Pointe, the setting

PAGE 54

54 for the climax of the novel. By tracing the process by which the anta gonists attain suburban membership over the course of the twentieth cen tury, Eugenides complicates the labor required in The Virgin Suicides to maintain the suburban ideal, but also the labor that is needed to become suburban in the first place.

PAGE 55

55 CHAPTER 4 INCEST AND INTERSEX: BECOMING SUBURBAN IN MIDDLESE X In The Virgin Suicides Eugenides critiques American subur bia through the retelling of the suicides of five middle-class white girls. Th e novel renders their suffocated sexualities the unfortunatebut necessaryby-product of the repressive suburban en vironment. Set outside of Detroit in the early 1970s, The Virgin Suicides introduces the Lisbon family as otherwise normative members of their neighborhood: Mr. and Mrs. Lisbon are married, their daughters are heterosexual, Mr. Lisbon is employed and supports his wife and children, and the family attends church regularly. Neither Eugeni des nor the narrators raise questi ons about the family's right to be suburban; it is assumed. As a result, the nove l's central concern lies with the process of perpetuation of the ideology of subur bia rather than its origin. In Middlesex however, Eugenides expands the tempor al reach of the novel to include the process of becoming a white, middle-class, Ameri can member of suburbia. Further cementing his position as a suburban author, he presents a historical trajectory of the development of suburban Detroit alongside the st ory of three generations of the Stephanides family. The suburban destination for the family of immigrants culminates in the 1970s in Grosse Pointe, the suburb of Detroit where Eugenides grew up. Some scholars contend that the The Virgin Suicides and Middlesex can be usefully understood as a single textual entity because of their shared location and temporality (Womack and Ma llory-Kani 157). However, considering these texts as distinct effects a more productive anal ysis of the ways in which each illustrates the American suburb and leverages a critique through different instances of deviance. First, Eugenides addresses intersec tions of race and class in Middlesex that he allowed to remain invisible in the Lisbons' wh ite, middle-class status in The Virgin Suicides Next, the retelling of a past through Cal, the narr ator and protagonist of Middlesex, functions as not only as a memorial

PAGE 56

56 but also as an explanation of his foundation in and rejection of his childhood suburb. Finally, Eugenides' treatment of incest, que er desire and intersexuality th at intersect with marginalized racial and class backgrounds offers a more mu lti-valanced critique of suburbia than the Lisbon girls' deviant heterosexual desi re could provide. While it is indeed useful to examine these novels alongside one another, to conflate them be cause the narratives conv erge within a distinct spatiotemporal moment is to overlook each novel's particular critique (157). Sexual deviance in Middlesex appears in the American subur b in the form of incest and queer adolescent desire. Cal's grandparents and parents enter in to incestuous marriages, a fact that is hidden behind outwardly normal heterosexual unions that yield seemingly average offspring. Queer desire is poten tially present in the metanarrativ e of Cal's adult romance with Julia, however it is more obviously present in Callie's lesbian1 relationship with Obscure Object as a child. The link between these instances of deviant sexuality occurs not in terms of desire, but in Cal's gender, specifically his intersexed gender identity. The chronology of Cal's family history begi ns with the emigration of his grandparents from Asia Minor in 1922 and culminates in the stor y of his present-day life in Berlin. Cal recalls the events that occur between th ese points in time. Through retell ing of both his family's history and his own, he assumes different narrative voic es. At times, he serves as the omniscient narrator that can provide reliable historical context. In other mo ments, he considers his story to be a personal memoir, allowing the reader to engage with and invest in the characters' 1 While Cal presents the gender identity of a man as an adult, it is not until he fully reveals his physical predicament, that is, his non-normative genitalia, to Julia, his romantic interest, that he is able to engage with her sexually (107, 514). The recognition of his intersex identity as it presents itself vis-a-vis his genitals has prevented him from becoming sexually intimate with women for most of adulthood. While Susan Frelich Appleton contends that Cal inherits the privilege of heterosexual men by assuming a male gender identity, I argue that his experience lacks two key characteristics of such privilege: childhood socialization as a boy and normative male genitalia (Gender, Law, and Narrative 436). Al so, because for the duration of Callie's relationship to Obscure Object, she believed herself to be a girl who was sexually attracted to another girl, I choose to describe their interactions as lesbian.

PAGE 57

57 relationships to the suburb ( Middlesex 19). This narrative strategy allows the novel to take on larger questions about suburbia because it forges a relationship between Cal and the reader and allows Eugenides to assume the pos ition of distant social critic. The division of narrative frames effects an image of suburbanites distant enough to allow readers to see the ways in which people buy into the suburban image. Through omniscient na rration, the reader is privy to the anxieties and struggles of the various char acters who labor to become American. Still, it is intimate enough to evoke a sympathetic reading of the Stephanides' family's struggle. Also, because the reader experiences the novel from Cal's point of view the novel encourages support for him along his journey. Cals purpose of beginning with a retelli ng of his grandparents emigration and his parents lives growing up in the U.S. is to locat e the origin of the recessive mutation on his fifth chromosome (that is the cause of his intersexuality ) and archive the rollerc oaster ride of a single gene through time (4). Moving between two voi ces and across time, Eugenides constructs a mythical narrator that is able to recall details w ith impossible, but believable authority. Just as the narrators of The Virgin Suicides provide the vehicle for Eugeni des critique of the suburb, Cal is the intermediary between the author and the reader. Whether Cal is immediately present or subtly narrating events separate from his own e xperience, the reader pe rceives the novel through his perspective. This strategy invites the reader to relate to and sympathize with Cal's condition. Francisco Callado-Rodriguez argues: Cal's role as narrator becomes specifically on e of convincing readers that there is nothing wrong with her/his apparently freaky condi tion . Her/his condition forces the protagonist to carry out a particular quest for sex and gender definition, for a human self that Cal sometimes understands to be a mere social invention. (81) Callado-Rodriguez's interpretation of Cal's constr uction of his memoir results in a celebratory reading of the novel. He applauds Eugenides' depiction of Cal as a textual location where

PAGE 58

58 multiple categorical opposites collide: woman/man, foreigner/native, and character/narrator. This results in Callado-Rodriguez's conclusion that Middlesex works to denounc[e] categorical thinking (75). This reading suggests that Cal' s position at the meeting pl ace of many identities opens an imaginative space where nature and nurt ure exist harmoniously rather than as binary opposites (83). Callado-Rodrigue z suggests that it is categorica l thinking that prevents Cal from achieving full Americanness. Thus, Middlesex reflects a positive suburban space that encourages and incorporates difference as fundament al to its existence. From this perspective, Eugenides' Gross Pointe transce nds categorical thinking and incubates identities that straddle the binary opposition of gender. However, this type of celebratory read ing fails to acknowledg e that Cal narrates Middlesex from Berlin, a city historically perceived to be accepting of sexual and gender deviance. He does not remain in Gross Pointe; he leaves the United States altogether, pursuing a career with the Foreign Service so as to never be forced to rema in in any single place for more than a few years. Cal's stay in Berlin will be temporary as well (Eugenides 106). Stricken with shame about his non-normative gender identity (106) Cal refers to his adult male life as a wandering in the maze these many years, shut away from sight. And from love, too (107). In this way, the suburb has failed to deliver a frac tion of the American Drea m to Cal, rendering him a lonely expatriate whose only remnant of his suburban upbringing is the shame he carries about his non-normative gender. More importantly, a celebratory reading su ch as Callado-Rodriguez's does not account for the two-thirds of the novel Eugenides dedicate s to detailing the considerable effort the Stephanides family exerted in order to obtain wh ite, middle-class status and gain membership into suburbia before Cal's interse xuality interrupted his girlhood.

PAGE 59

59 Race and class are the two major axes of di fference faced by the Stephanides family as they enter the United States and begin to build a life there. Foregrounding the labor performed in order to bury their ethnicity and working-class background and prepare for an American future reveals the ways in which the Stephanides family actively participates in constructing the suburban ideal. Their purpose is to ensure that this ideal includes themselves, which necessitates that they forget about their in cestuous history and reinvent themselves as worthy of suburban membership. A chronological analysis of the ways in which they confront barriers between themselves and the Americanness they seek to achieve will illuminate the interconnections between race, class, sexuality and gender. An overview of the Stephanides family's venture into suburbia and Cal's rejection of it demonstrates that indeed, Eugeni des finds in Cal a triumphant co mpromise. The first-two thirds of the novel illustrate this journey of Desdem ona and Lefty, and then of Tessie and Milton (including other family members on the way) in order to articulate the process of overcoming difference and becoming legitimate members of middle-class Americaand thus, the suburb. The final third, then, shows the narrators journey from Callie to Cal in order to call attention to the types of identities and differ ences the American suburb refuses to subsume and must reject in order to maintain a proper heterosexual family order within its borders. In other words, Cals intersexed and queer identities bar him from suburban membership in ways that his familys ethnic and class background did not Cals rejection of the opport unity to be operated back into normality is more broadly a dismissal of th e conformity suburbia requ ires in terms of gender and sexuality. The denouement of the novel signals to a hopeful future for Cal and Julie. Yet the suburb and its residents remain unchanged, doomed to reproduce the normative forces that inspired Cal's original exodus as an adolescent. The concluding message in Middlesex is similar

PAGE 60

60 to that in The Virgin Suicides : while the consciousness of its residents may have progressed beyond that of their suburban environment (in this case, evidenced by Cal's sexual encounter with Julie), the suburb inevitably reproduces itse lf and the gender and sexual norms contained therein. Cal's compromise, while a victory for himself, does not advance the discourse of the American suburb beyond a mere recognition of de viance and a willingness to curb that deviance back into heteronormative articulations. In order to embody an intersexed identityas opposed to a heterosexual male suburban oneCal must flee not only suburbia, but the United States altogether. Transcending Difference: Race and Class in Suburbia Just as in The Virgin Suicides Eugenides begins Middlesex by revealing the climax. In the very first sentence, Cal discloses, I was bor n twice: first, as a baby girl, on a remarkably smogless Detroit day in January of 1960; and then again, as a teenage boy, in an emergency room near Petoskey, Michigan, in August of 1974 (3). However, the story that precedes Cals birth and rebirth involves the incestuous unions of his grandparents, Lefty and Desdemona and his parents, Tessie and Milton. In order to explain how Cal negotiates his identity as an expatriate living in Berlin, Eugenides first details Greek i mmigrants' journeys from Smyrna to Detroit and the ways in which their children became middle-class Americans. As suburban scholarship notes, white, middl e-class families stand as the ideal suburban residents, yet studies challenge that ideal by insisting that me mbers of marginalized racial identities and working-class people have achieved and continue to aspire to life in suburbia. Eugenides situates his fictive s uburb within this dialectic, sh owing through the suburbanization of the Stephanides family that the social struct ures of twentieth-century America benefit those who most closely approximate the white, middle-cla ss, family ideal. Sara Ahmed's metaphor of peas in a pod explicates th e process by which working-clas s Greeks become middle-class

PAGE 61

61 Americans. Ahmed's argument, as demonstrated in the second chapter of this paper, centers on the retrospective homogenization th at occurs within communities such as the suburb. Close proximity generates a perception of likeness, sh e argues, and the Stephanides family benefits from this in their endeavor to define themselves as white, middle-class, and suburban. They distinguish themselves from Blackness and worki ng-class status and achieve a suburban identity in opposition to Detroit and its deviance. Desd emona and Lefty work actively to reformulate their identities in order to eras e their ethnic and class differen ces and become subsumed under a sort of retrospective hom ogenization that will enhance the social standing of their children. Cal begins tracing this pro cess in 1922, when his grandparents, Desdemona and Lefty take their first steps toward Americanness in thei r flight from Smyrna to the United States. Deserted by the Greek fleet, Lefty convinces a Fr ench official that he and Desdemona (who he claims is his wife) were born in Paris in order to gain access to a French merchant vessel to emigrate to the United States. Accompanie d by their new friend, a bloody and desperate Dr. Philobosian, who Lefty claims is his cousin, three new French citizens set sail, leaving a burning city behind them. In order to earn a pa ssage to the United States, they must whiten themselves slightly, claiming a French identity so that they may escape Smyrna. This passage foreshadows how the flexibility of their racial id entity will benefit them as they assimilate into American culture. Their willingness to be perc eived as French in order to gain access to a privilege unavailable to Greeks in Turkey lays the foundation for the ways the Stephanides family will reinvent themselves in the United States. Once in America, Lefty struggles to overcome class barriers and atta in his portion of the American dream through various avenues. First, he gains employment in a Ford factory in Detroit in 1922. Lefty becomes part of the machine of the assembly line along with many other

PAGE 62

62 non-English speaking immigrants (95). Desdemon a also embraces the assembly line mentality in the home, completing domestic duties perfuncto rily (98). The impact of the Ford English School where Lefty attended mandatory classes reach es into the Stephanides home directly. The various courses educate students in the English language but also provide lifestyle guidelines for the Americans-in-training. They serve to impart American culture onto immigrant workers and specifically center on cleanliness as the most important achievement. For example, Lefty recites in unison with his coworkers phrases like employ ees should use plenty of soap and water in the home and the most advanced people are the cl eanest (97). In anot her instance, two Ford officials visit the Stephanides home to police th e cleanliness of their employee and ensure he was conducting his life properly. They suggest that Lefty obtain a mortgage and inquire about his grooming habits. They provi de a new toothbrush and instruct him how to use it (100). Each of these are transparent efforts by Ford to assimilate their immigrant workers to an American way of life by cleaning up their filth. The purifica tion process culminates in a pageant in which symbols of various nations (i ncluding Greece) are inte grated into the Ford English School Melting Pot (104). As Henry Fo rd looks on approvingly, the immigrant workers are made one step closer to becoming Americans as their ethnic difference is dissolved into a cauldron that unites each of its components in whiteness (104). Following termination from the factory, Le fty seeks out economic success through illegal endeavors. He feels pressured to provide for his expecting wife and begins smuggling alcohol and opens a clandestine basement bar that he name d The Zebra Room (132). He also participates in auto-erotica, supplying female models for a photographer for extra inco me (158). The wealth he gains from these activities allowed him to purchase a building in Detroit and create an above ground Zebra Room [that] was a bar and grill (168).

PAGE 63

63 While Lefty struggles to achieve a middleclass status for himself and his family, Desdemona experiences the binary conceptions of race in Detroit that left her ironically on the Black side. She gains employment at a Muslim Temple, making silk, in which she has to darken her ethnic background in order to be hired. Th e others at the temple are Black, and espouse hatred toward whites (153). Desdemona real izes that part of her becoming a Detroiter necessitates that she [see] everything in terms of black and white. Desdemonas experience at the temple highlights the race relations in Detroit as distinctly black versus white, with no middle ground. Desdemonas ability to be perceived as Black foreshadows the privileged position the Stephanides family will be granted later by this insistence on a binary. Despite Desdemona's ability to pass as Black in this context, she is later interpolated as white, thus transcending her ethnic difference in opposition to African Americans of Detroit. Eugenides traces the changing racial climate of Detroit throughout the 1950s and into the 1960s through the experiences of Milton (Lefty and Desdemona's son) and his wife (and second cousin) Tessie. Milton tries to grasp his portion of the American Dream by using a loan made possible by the G.I. Bill to transform The Zebra Ro om into Hercules Hot Dogs (201). Eventually becoming a chain of restaurants, Hercules Hot Dogs symbolizes the merging of Greek and American identities that is fueled by Ameri can capitalism. Milton commodifies his Greek heritagehis 'difference' and repackages it in a prototypical form of American consumption: fast food (201). Cal narrates a Technicolor image of booming business in motion, with a hint of critical humor, with a close-up of the cash register ringing open and closed, of Miltons hands counting money (204). Milton also purchases a home, its spacious living room a reflection of his material success (204). E quipped with his own business and a new home, Milton extends his grasp of the American dream extends past that of his parents which moves him closer to

PAGE 64

64 permanent membership in the white middle class. As a testament to his parents' increasing immersion into American culture, Cal notes that the television remains turned on and Milton only serves drinks with 'names of people,' such as Tom Collins (223). Despite this new privileged lifestyle, involvi ng entrepreneurship, ho meownership and leisure, the encroaching black population of Detroit tarn ishes the value of their busin ess and their home. Despite overwhelming financial success, Milton experiences 'white flight' in terms of economic loss. The race riots in Detroit in 1967 mark a turning point for the Stephanides family, transforming them almost immediately into member s of the white, middle class. First, the riots solidify a white identity for Milton and his family, a racial category his parents worked to attain a generation earlier. Historically, Detroit has been a central location in which the racial binary between blackness and whiteness was exaggerated. Desdemona's realization that residents are either black or white and that no third racial identity exists is consistent with the socio-historical context of Detroit at the time. To be white mean t simply, to be not black. Thus, ethnic difference dissolves and whiteness becomes a homogenizing racial category that in cludes the Stephanides family. As Valerie Babb points out, whitene ss and Americanness are synonymous (118). Thus, the race riots of Detroit benefit the social status of the Stepha nides family because it defines them as white it also made them more American. The riots not only benefit the racial identity of Milton and his family, but also effect financial gain. Cal comments: Shameful as it is to say, the riots were the best thing that ever ha ppened to us. Overnight we went from being a family desperately trying to stay in the middle class to one with hopes of speaking into the upper, or at least the upper middle. (252) Milton receives a significant porti on of insurance money following th e demise of his diner in the city fires that allow him to purchase two sym bols of upward mobility: a Cadillac (252) and a

PAGE 65

65 home in the suburbs (254). Now securely me mbers of white America, the Stephanides make permanent their place in the middle class by moving to suburbia. He overcomes the racist bias of the real estate agent who attempts to stee r him toward a more appropriate neighborhood for his ethnic background. Milton's ability to pay cash for a home earns him the right to move to Grosse Pointe, a white middle-clas s suburb. In other words, his class status (as expressed in terms of his liquid assets) gran ts him the privilege to transcend his ethnic identity. The Stephanides family then, becomes full-fledged me mbers of white, middle-class American suburb. They have achieved the American Dream and now own a portion of suburbia to prove it. Through the narrative of the Stephanides family's journey to the United States and subsequent acquisition of an American iden tity through whiteness and middle-class status, Eugenides foregrounds the amount of effort each re quires. Neither comes to any member of the family automatically, but each must perform the id entities correctly in or der to be eventually permitted as legitimate white Americans in suburbia. Cal later remembers being referred to as the ethnic girl in her all white prep school, indi cating that her family's membership in suburbia is never guaranteed. It is also applied retrospectively and varies in different locations, as Callie's prep school experience indicates Instead, it is contingent upon the proper intersection of heterosexuality, middle-class status and whitenessa meeting place that Cal's intersexed identity reveals to be predicated on incestuous sexual deviance. Linking Whiteness and Heterosexuality Whiteness studies scholar Mason Stokes conten ds that while central, whiteness is not the only defining characteristic re quired for attaining Americanness. He claims that whiteness works bestin fact, that it works onlywhen it at taches itself to other ab stractions. (13). For his work, the key abstracti on is heterosexuality; he ar gues that both whiteness and heterosexuality work together to form an enorm ous, yet nearly invisible, normative disciplinary

PAGE 66

66 presence (13). The incestuous marriages in Middlesex testify to Stokes' argument. For both Desdemona and Lefty and Tessie and Milt on, incest is obscured by whiteness and heterosexuality. In other words, the sexual devi ance that predicates these unions is buried beneath presentations of white identity and hete rosexual, reproductive marriage. These couples escape social ostracization that could potentially result from their in cestuous relationships because they approximate the normative Ameri can family by projecting proper race (white) and correct desire (heterosexual). Stokes' theoretical apparatus renders previ ous suburban scholarship on race and class incomplete without attention to sexuality. In order to fully understand the multiple dimensions of racial and class differences in the suburbs and the ways they challenge the presupposition of whiteness, we must also consider (hetero) sexuality. Stokes' intervention foregrounds the underlying assumption of heterosexuality on whic h the suburbs function. Thus, heterosexual marriage frames the image of the suburb in c oncert with whiteness and middle-class status, making sexuality an integral component of refashioning oneself as American. In Middlesex, the protagonists grapple with various experiences of deviant desire that they attempt to silence under a guise of hetero sexuality. Incest, the most prominent and taboo form of deviant desire in the novel, begins be fore Desdemona and Lefty arrive in the United States. In Smyrna, the brother and sister struggle with their desire for one another. Stricken with guilt, Lefty seeks alternative outlets, visiting prostitutes who resemble Desdemona (32). He prays to God asking for reprieve from his unnatural desire (31). Desdemona, oblivious to her own sexual desires, is unaware of Lefty's intentions until they depart from Smyrna to the United States.

PAGE 67

67 The duration of the trip to the United Stat es marks a more permanent transformation of their desire for Desdemona and Lefty. In additio n to assuming false nationalities to gain entrance to America, the trip signifies a translation of a sibling relationshi p into a marital one. Lefty was aware that whatever happened now would become the truth, that whatever he seemed to be would become what he wasalread y an American, in other words (67). While on the ship, he engages in a simulated cour tship with Desdemona, enacti ng a proposal and performing a wedding ceremony (67). Cal notes that the marital charade functioned to ensure for themselves that their fictive courtship is not overshadowed by incest (68). Other travelers, as Cal indicated earlier, are too engrossed in their own pursuits of a new life to notice Desdemona and Leftys fictive courtship is predicated by the incestuous love between brothe r and sister (49). Thus, their transatlantic voyage affords them the opportunity to transform th emselves from Greek refugee siblings as they board to a reproductive married couple when they disembark. In other words, no onenot the French officials in Smyrna, th e fellow passengers aboard the ship, or the immigration administrators in New Yorkquesti oned the legitimacy of their marriage and as a result, the incest could be masked and kept secret Declared literate, married to only one person (albeit a sibling), democratically inclined, mentally stable, and authoritatively deloused Desdemona and Lefty are welcomed successfully into the United States as husband and wife, and as potential Americans (74). Ethnic differen ce, masked by a bit of deceit and marriage, is overcome just enough to allow them access to the United States. While outwardly presenting a front of hete rosexual marital normalcy, underneath the surface sexual anxiety brews for Desdemona. She worries that her sexual transgressions would result in deformed children, thereby indic ting her for failure to properly engage in heterosexuality. Desdemona resorts to sexual avoidance to remedy her fears about producing

PAGE 68

68 abnormal offspring. Denying her husband sexual access to her body in order to control her reproductive capacities deviates from the hetero sexual norm. Heterosexual marriage within suburbia (also termed heteronormativity) facili tates procreation; re fusing to engage in heterosexual sex disrupts reproduction and is thus deviant. Desdemona's effort to mask her incestuous marriage by forbidding se xual activity with her husband exemplifies another type of labor involved in the journey towa rd heteronormativity. And, as Stokes points out, this is a central component to claiming an American identity. Deviance Revealed: Callie/Cal The birth of Calliope to Tessie and Milton do es not appear in the primary narrative strand until Book Three (of four) in Middlesex nearly halfway into the nove l (216). Cal marks the day of his birth as a baby girl as a schism between two worlds. He states: Up until now it hasn't been my world. Not my America (217). While he provides no direct explanation, the events that follow suggest that Cal r ecognizes the distance between th e his parents' experience of America and his own, in the same way that the narrators of The Virgin Suicides understood the dissonance between theirs and their parents' unders tandings of their suburb. From this point, Calliope (or Callie) is the central fi gure in the narrative as Cal details his girlhood in Detroit, his adolescence in Grosse Pointe and his eventual escape from suburbia to various urban spaces. Her labor as an adolescent girl to approximate appropriate femi ninity and his labor as both an adolescent boy and adult man to realize a satisfying gender identi ty constitute the remainder of the novel. In the first half of Middlesex, Eugenides emphasizes the labor required for the Stephanides family to achieve white, middle-clas s suburban status, a process that overlaps in the narrative with Callie's birth. However, the second half of the book centers on the willful effort to maintain this position of privilege which, most poignantly, necessitates a complete disavowal of

PAGE 69

69 Callie's intersexed condition. In other words, B ooks One and Two depict the family's journey t oward something, namely, access to white middleclass suburbia. Cals narration of his adolescence, however, re trospectively reveals the Stephanides' journey away from something: their deviant past as it is embodied by Calli ope. Callie's body is physical evidence of the incestuous past of her parents and grandparent s; her genetic mutation announces her family's sexual deviance, exposing their secret in a way th at cannot be ignoredat le ast not for very long. However, the family succeeds in overlooking Callie's condition until she reaches adolescence. Until then, they enjoy an uninterrupted middle-cla ss American lifestyle, able to look away from their deviant historie s and pretend that they are norm al, rightful suburban residents. Until puberty, Callie, her family and their phys ician regard her as a relatively normally developed girl. Cal remembers, I was brought up as a girl and had no doubt s about this (226). Activities such as playing with dolls contri bute to an unquestioned acceptance that Callie was both sexed and gendered correctly, as a girl. Sex and sexuality are issues shrouded in a zone of privacy and fragility, unspoken about in a suburb an space that depended on this silence. Even Tessie bathed her daughter with blinders on, neve r noticing the unusual shape of Callies genitals (226). A beautiful baby, Callie grew into a beau tiful girl. Her harmonious physical attributes perpetuated the illusion that Callie was developing normally (278). As a child, Callie experiences sexual desire for other girls. While she is aware that something is improper about her relationship with neighbor girl, Clementine Stark, she would not have been able to articulate it (265). She knows enough to keep secret her feelings for other girls, but didnt connect this feeling to sex (265). And since sex was something I shouldnt tell my mother about, Callie continues to grow up without any language to describe her desires or guidance about how to understand them (265) This queer desire, understood by Callie as

PAGE 70

70 between herself as a girl and ot her girls, does not prompt her to question her gender identity; for her, these are distinct. It is not until later, in conversation with Dr. Luce, would she be forced to think of her gender and sexuality as related components of her intersexed condition. Due to Dr. Phils decrepitude and Tessies prudishness, [Callie] arrives at puberty not knowing much about what to expect (283). Bu t by age twelve, Callie begins to notice the disparity between her bodys maturation and that of her peers. Her classmates rapidly transform into women and she considers the possibility that she would be l eft behind in the race toward adulthood (285). Callies body does change, but instead of developing breasts and hips, she grows taller and her voice deep ens. In order to counter th e androgynous pull of her body, she grows her hair long, clinging to the only femini ne characteristic she could control. Her problematic body asserts itself to Callie despite he r ardent attempts to hide it behind her hair and ignore it in hopes it would somehow become normal (294). She actively cultivates long hair, laboring to mask her androgynous body behind a marker of femininity so that others can ignore the other indications of maleness. Callie dreams to someday live inside [her hair] (306). It provides a barrier between her a nd the outside world. As she gr ows up, she retreats inside her hair. Meanwhile, Callie works actively to become feminine, shaving her legs and armpits, plucking her eyebrows and applying make-up (311 ). The emergence of a few darkish hairs above [her] upper lip are attributed to her Greek heritage and remedied by a trip to the salon (310). Callie accumulates name brand markers of femininity; products such as Daisy razors, Lip Smacker and Breck Crme Rinse with Body clutte r her bathroom cabinet. Callie assuages her mothers concerns and avoids an appointment with the gynecologist by faking her period. She flushes unused tampons and feign[s] symptoms from headache to fatigue (361). Comparing

PAGE 71

71 her acting talent to Meryl Streep, Callie pe rpetuates the illusion of her transition into womanhood, allowing those around her to easily follo w in that illusion. She acts the part of teenage girl successfully. Her desire to properly occupy her pr oscribed gender role of girl coupled with her family's presumption that sh e was indeed, a girl, l eaves no room for the question that she, perhaps, was not one. Despite her body's insist ence upon androgyny, she accumulates the proper feminine accoutrements in order to convince herself, her peers and her family that she does fulfill the gender id entity assigned to her at birth. Evidence of deviance from gender and sexual norms is ignored or remains unnoticed by Cals family until she suffers from an accident a nd is taken to the hospital and given a physical examination (396). Following physical and psychological examinations at the Sexual Disorders and Gender Identity Clinic, Dr. Luce concludes that Callies clitoris is larger than a normal girls and that a quick operation would fix everythi ng. When she discovers medical files that reported her XY chromosomes, she realizes then th at the intent of Dr. Luces surgery was not to normalize her female body but to castrate her male one. Surgery could re construct her genitals so as to make them resemble normal female ge nitalia, thus affording her a seamless transition into womanhood. In other words, Callie is incap able of masking her own deformity any longer, and surgery is neededand the only optionfor returning her body to the fiction of girlhood. The surgery represents the most obvi ous form of labor required by subur bia. In order to return to suburban normalcy, Callie must restructure the phys ical marker of her gender variance, that is, her genitals. Surgery promises to correct her genetic transgression and facilitate a smooth transition back into suburban heteronormativity asalmosta normal woman. The suburb offers only two opposing roles for its residents: woma n or man. Callie's intersexed body rejects both of t hose options. Instead, it reveals the incestuous relationships that

PAGE 72

72 presumably caused the genetic mutation. A physical testament to the generations of forbidden desire, Callie's body must be transformed in order to conform to suburba n gender ideologies and continue to keep the family's deviance a well-kept secret. But, despite Dr. Luce's insistence upon forci ng her body to cooperate with the gender role she had occupied since birth, Calli e chooses to reject this impulse to fix her deformed body. This rejection of the surgical procedure to co rrect her condition doubles as a rejection of the social structures of suburbia that require adherence to the gender binary. Cal cuts her hair short and hitchhikes west, to the city. At this point in the narrative, a t eenage suburban girl named Callie becomes a wandering intersexed boy named Cal. Cal escapes to Berkeley and San Francisco. In the city, he feels he can reconstruct his identity because in many ways, he is anonymous. The sense of anonymity is heightened by his work at Octopussy, a peep show club that ca pitalizes on his ambiguous genitalia by displaying his body from the waist down to curious viewers. They do not see his face, however, reducing his body to a commodity and allowing him the ideol ogical space to reinvent himself as separate and distinct from his genitals. He severs ties with his family and seeks the comfort of other gender deviants in order to grow into his new self The city serves as a site of rebirth for Cal because the image of the city is not threatened by Cal's intersexuality in the same way the suburb is. Because Cal is the product of incestuous de sirea point that the novel relies on biological determination to explainhis very existence sta nds to threaten the fiction of suburban normality his family had constructed for themselves. Th e city offers anonymity and multiple avenues through which to articulate gender. It is no acc ident that Cal chooses San Francisco, a city perceived to be haven for gender and sexual deviants. Nonetheless, urban space carries less

PAGE 73

73 rigid expectations of gendered ro les, allowing Cal to navigate his own identity outside of the traditional roles of woman or man that suburbia offers. Cal eventually returns to Grosse Pointe after his stay in San Francisco to attend his father's funeral. While Tessie originally percei ves Cal's masculine identity as criminal and a form of punishment for her own deviant sexua l desire, she grows to realize that Cal was essentially the same person as Callie (520). Cal comments, [a]fter I returned from San Francisco and started living as a male, my family found that, contrary to popular opinion, gender was not all that important (520). Middlesex Intersex and Suburbia. Cal's return to a tolerant suburban fam ily metonymically represents the potential suburban membership available to him following his gender conversion. Eugenides concludes Middlesex with a hopeful teenage Cal, standing at the front doorway of his parents' home, happy to be home, weeping for my father, and th inking about what was next (529). The reader knows what follows this scene in Cal's life as he has provided glimpses into his adult life throughout the text: he continues to present a successful male gender identity, he maintains a close relationship with Tessie, he travels with his job in the Foreign Service and, most importantly, he falls in love. Eugenides sets up th e metanarrative of Cal's relationship to Julie in order to frame the entire novel as a prologue to th eir love story. Cal narrates his romance with Julie in the interstices of the novel, rendering it an interesting, but ineffect ual narrative strand until the novel's close. Because the novel ends chronologically prior to the present day from which Cal narrates, the intermittent tale of Cal and Julie serves to va lidate the hopefulness Ca l described in the final pages. Eugenides concludes the novel in this way to force the reader to connect the optimism

PAGE 74

74 Cal feels as a teenage boy to th e romantic breakthrough he experien ces as an adult with Julie. This strategy invites a positive reading of the novel, and consequently, of the suburb. Despite the resolution of the nove l that indicates Cal is happ ily adjusted to his identity, Susan Frelich Appleton questions E ugenides' choice to depict Cal as a heterosexual male. Some scholars applaud the queer-oriente d conclusion [that facil itates] a new type of being through the character of Ca l (Callado-Rodriquez 83), Appleton prefers to view Cal as a straight man. She interprets his choice to trade in a girlhood for a manhood as a decision made [i]n recognition of his chromosomes, hormones, and physical attraction to women (406). While overall offering a positive and productive reading of Middlesex, Appleton explores possible alternatives to Cal's identity, such as a lesbian woman, or a person who repudiates gender and sexual categories altogether. However, Applet on's reading is useful because it acknowledges the successful transition to manhood Cal experiences. She also suggests that readers (especially those she terms gender dichotomists) can mo re readily empathize with a heterosexual male version of Cal. In other words, Cal's other pos sible gender expressions w ould be too deviant to engender the type of rap port with the reader that he is able to do so in Middlesex; a lesbian woman would deter the homophobic reader a nd a gender outlaw would offend the gender dichotomist (434). Because Eugenides portrays Ca l as fitting neatly within the boundaries of heterosexual manhood, his existence does not disr upt the relationship between categories of gender (of which there are two) and sexuality (o ne of which is correctheterosexualand one that is devianthomosexual). While Appleton correctly cont ends that Eugenides' emphasi s on the biological component of Cal's condition portrays Cal and other intersexed individual s as the hapless victims of a condition or abnormality over which they have no control (437), her concern with Middlesex is

PAGE 75

75 in its implications for United States legal decisi ons regarding marriage. Her critique fails to acknowledge that Cal articulates hi s heterosexual male identity outside of the United States. The culmination of his desirethat is the insinuated sex with Julie does not occur in an American context, but in Berlin. In other words, he overc omes the final barrier of shame in a foreign urban space. To redirect Appleton's questions about alte rnative identity choices for Cal within the context of American suburban discourse reveals Cal' s status as a straight man to be considerably less successful. His decision to temporarily abandon his family in search of his identity in San Francisco implies that his suburban environment did not provide a safe haven for this transition. His career path in the Foreign Service as an adul t further reflects the suburb as an insufficient residence for an intersexed man. Finally, his relati onship with Julie that marks his final personal reconciliation with his body, occurs in Berlin, a place he will soon be forced to leave. These details complicate Appleton's reading of Cal as a straight man, specifically because he rejects the role of straight man that could be availabl e to him in the suburbs had he desired it. Just as Cal's parents and grandparents burie d their sexual deviance underneath a facade of white, middle-class heteronormativity, Cal could ha ve refashioned himself similarly, obscuring his gender variation behind his nor mative racial, class and sexual identities. Outwardly, Cal functions as a normal man. Therefore, to 'pass' as a heterosexual man would have granted him membership into the American suburb. With the secrets sexual deviance of his predecessors and his non-normative genital construction properly kept, Cal could perpetuate the Stephanides family's suburban legacy. He would simply n eed to uphold the family's fiction of normativity. Yet, as Appleton fails to note, he rejects that option. He chooses not to embrace a straight male identity in favor of an intersexed one. Because he takes on a queer gender identity that indicates

PAGE 76

76 that his sexual orientation escapes clear demarca tion into the categories of straight or gay, he must abandon the suburban life altogether. Choosing to stay in Grosse Pointe would threaten to undo all the labor his parents and grandparents put forth in achieving suburban status. So, he removes himself as the physical evidence of incest uous desire and aspires toward a straight male identity that incorporates his inters exuality rather than disavow it. Eugenides shows the suburbs to be tolerant of gender variance as long as it can maintain a safe distance from it. Tessie's reaction to Cal's first homecoming following his reinvention of himself as male exemplifies this attitude. At fi rst, she fears his gender identity will reflect poorly on her own behavior. But, she acce pts her child once she realizes th at he is essentially the same person, equally qualified to fill the daughterly role despite a masculine gender presentation (520). Tessie's treatment of Cal symbolizes the larger attitude toward deviation from the norm that characterized the suburb fo r previous generations of the Stephanides family: as long as you do not threaten to unmask the suburb as a mere ideology, you may stay. Cal's desire to love and be loved as an intersexed man precludes suburban membership. For this reason, the suburb that Eugenides wishes to applaud fo r its progressive tolerance of gender variance is instead reified as rigid, traditional, and rooted firmly in white, middle-class heteronormativity. While the Stephanides family is a testament that the suburbs do, in fact, house sexual deviance, they also reveal the necess ity to contain it completelyan endeavor that requires an enormous amount of effort. So wh ile Cal recognizes a slight shift in attitude between the world views of his parents' generati on and his own, he concedes, [s]till, it was not nothing to witness me so changed (515). In ot her words, the Grosse Pointe he leaves behind remains only slightly unchanged after Cal escape s to San Francisco. Despite his hope that his

PAGE 77

77 suburb would become a place designed for a new type of human being, it remained the beacon it was intended to be, a beacon of suburbia (529). The considerable length of Middlesex allows for extensive charac ter development, not only of Cal, but of his family as well. Furtherm ore, the shift between om niscient and first person narration facilitates the humanization of each majo r character in the novel. Because the reader experiences the journey to the American suburb from the perspective of each generation of the Stephanides family, the novel evokes a sympathe tic response to the id eological work that individuals do. Unlike The Virgin Suicides, which concludes with a critical anticlimax, Middlesex invites readers to celebrate Cal's persona l triumph and empathize with his family's struggle for suburban membership. While Eugenides attempts to connect th e critique of suburbia from his first novel to his second, Middlesex ultimately humanizes the labor the suburb requires to the extent that the novel become s a different project altogether. The duality of distance /proximity present in The Virgin Suicides' narrative structure does resonate with Cal's simultaneous intimacy with and rejection of Grosse Pointe. The novel's structure of narrator retrospect ively telling the story of the suburbs anticipates an extended critique of the suburb. Cal's in itial separation from the suburb, as a resident of Berlin, suggests that he rejects the suburb because of the repressive forces that made his intersexed condition possible. But by the end of the novel, Eugenides expects readers to sympathize with each unique member of the family and forgive them for thei r laborious clamoring for suburban membership. Because Cal's story ends with romantic trium ph, the transgression of his grandparents can be forgiven and forgotten. In this forgetting, however, is an American suburb that continues to exert willful labor in order to protect and maintain an image that would not include the Stephanides family had Cal attempted to embody an in tersexed identity in Grosse Pointe.

PAGE 78

78 The resolution of Middlesex advocates an acceptance of th e image of the suburb as an inevitable but manageable obstacle to the American Dream. Transcending this barrier requires sacrifice and deceit, but delivers a satisfying su burban lifestyle that results in permanent belonging in America. Middlesex claims that approaching whiteness, middle-class status and heteronormativity grants access to suburbia. To re fuse is noble, but to accept is normal. Thus Eugenides fails to deliver a seque l to his scathing critique of th e image of the American suburb he poses in The Virgin Suicides because Middlesex celebrates the malleabili ty of race, class and sexuality rather than critiquing the necessity to repress difference in favor of normalization.

PAGE 79

79 CHAPTER 5 CONCLUSION Eugenides' image of suburban Detroit res onates with the pictures painted by both Bill Bryson and Richard Bachman. A distant observer mi ght witness the outward signs of similarity in these illustrations: well-manicured lawns, ch ildren playing outside, single family homes, a sense of neighborhood camaraderie. These detail s provide a rough sketch of the commonsense vision of American suburbia that each of these authors conjures in their fictive settings. Yet the story of suburbia is not as neatly packaged as it se ems to be. Its ubiquity in the American imagination allows for the image of th e suburb to stand as a cultural icon without too much protest. Thus, Bryson can write suburbanites enjoy a good laugh and then sit around drinking iced tea and talking applia nces for an hour or so. No human being had ever been quite this happy beforeand readers believe him (6). It is not that Bryson is intentionally deceitful, because his memoir attests to the fact that fo r him, the happy neighborhood did exist. Rather, Bryson invites the readers to share his nostalgia fo r the suburbs and is successful because he taps into a familiar American trope about the suburb as the apotheosis of the American Dream. Of course, not every reader will relate to Bryson' s childhood experiences of the suburb directly, but they can at least imagine it. The ideology of the Amer ican suburb, while upholding whiteness and middle-class status as quinte ssential suburban qualities, is de mocratic in that it allows anyone to participate in the fantasy. Because the suburb exists only as an image, it becomes repackaged as experience through series of re petitive decisionsficti ons suburbanites tell themselves and each other. Central to this narra tive is a binary mode of thinking that divides urban and rural spaces in opposition to one anothe r and ranks the suburb as the preferred, safe, white middle-class haven over the filthy, crime-ridden and diverse city.

PAGE 80

80 Implementing and maintaining this image and separation from the nearby city requires an enormous amount of labor, as Eugenides demonstrates in The Virgin Suicides and Middlesex The Lisbons and their neighbors repr ess the potential devi ant sexuality of the five sisters, cover up the markers of deterioration of the suburb and willfully ignore evidence of Detroit's presence in their midst. The Virgin Suicides arrives already embedded in the suburban image, unlike Middlesex which traces the laborious process by whic h the Stephanides family gains entrance into suburbia. The labor in Middlesex occurs in many forms over three generations of individuals who are each invested in their own journey toward Americanization. Transcending racial and class differences, the Stephanideses emerge as rightful members of the American suburb. The continued effort to project whiteness, middle-class status, and heteronormativity allows them to imagine themselves as having achieved the American Dream. Each of these novels exemplif ies the inextricable tie between race, class and sexuality, as Mason Stokes contends in The Color of Sex For the protagonists in The Virgin Suicides and Middlesex, the unacknowledged mandate of heteronor mativity in suburbia effects negative consequences. The Lisbon girls escape th e sexual repression in their neighborhood by committing suicide. Cal rejects the suburb's offer to allow him to stay, provided he perpetuates the labor that masks his family's incest and his own intersexuality. While Eugenides specifically contends with the suburb as literary space, his pr oximity to the actual suburb suggests a return to the ramifications the imagined suburb may have on the real, experiential suburb. My reading of Eugenides novels claims that socio-historical scholarship is inco mplete without consideration of sexuality as an avenue by which to interrogate and challenge the commonsense vision of the suburb.

PAGE 81

81 Revisionist scholars have recently be gun to expand on previous work on Black suburbanization and working-class suburbs to incorporate sexuality and queerness in the discourse. For example, Wayne H. Brekhus' work Peacocks, Chameleons, Centaurs: Gay Suburbia and the Grammar of Social Identity (2003) provides ethnographic data about gay men who reside in suburbia and negotia te their sexual identities in various ways. Brekhus finds that the gay men he encountered in a single subur b of New York City ar ticulate suburban gay identities that range from fully visible within the suburb and more private, with a separate gay identity reserved only for city spaces. He outlines three categories of gay identity presentation in terms of duration and intensity: the peacock (the lifestyler), the chameleon (the commuter), and the centaur (the integrator). Brekhus' study relies on a boundary between urban and suburban space and recognizes the distinct expectations an d moral code present in each. He comments, suburbs, for instance, have a sanitizing effect on public displays, while commercial and red light districts of larger ci ties encourage more conspicuous identity displays (20). Brekhus' project is concerned only with the literal experience of the individuals in the suburb. While it is important to adjust suburban history to in clude gay men and other queer identities, this sociological st udy insists on a reality of suburbi a that ignores its literary dimension. Peacocks, Chameleons, Centaurs in focusing on recording and assessing experience, overlooks the looming im age of suburbia that clearly ex cludes gay male identities. As my readings of Eugenides novels show, the imagined suburb powerfully shapes the every day twentieth century details of suburban residents an d imbues perfunctory tasks such as yard work with enormous cultural weight. Brekhus contributes to the growing body of scholarship that seeks to rewrite suburban history, but it cannot be complete without considering the imag ined aspect of the suburb.

PAGE 82

82 Because the image is a literary space, it cannot be captured by so cio-historical research. Thus, suburban scholarship requires an in terdisciplinary approach in or der to account for the complex and subtle reach of the image of the suburb. The image remains pervasive into the tw entieth century neces sitating a continued exploration of its impact on the construction of American identity. Those who chose to reside in the contemporary suburb do so because it promises to provide a particular American lifestyle that they desire for themselves. Characterized by mi ddle-class status, homeownership, material and economic success, idyllic landscapes, convenien t location and friendly neighbors, the suburb serves as a healthy haven from the ills of the densely populated city. The recent trend toward gated suburban communities exemplifies the sens e that the suburb remains both separate and superior from its urban counter part. Fortressing a neighborhood with walls and gates solves Americans' dilemma of how to protect themselv es and their children from danger, crime, and unknown others while still perpetuating open, frie ndly neighborhoods and comfortable, safe homes (Low 462). Implicit in this impulse to erect physical boundaries around a suburb is the ideological distance it establishes from the c ity. The perceived need for di vision of spaces rests on the assumption that the city produces crime, poverty and social disorder. The suburb, then, still exists as a viable alternative, a space constructed in opposition to city filth that offers a safe, stable, American way of life. However, as Se tha Low points out, the distinction between suburb and city results in false secu rity provided by architectural sy mbols such as gates and walls (262). In reality, gated commun ities are not safer than nongated communities . Instead, the logic of symbolism satisfies middle-class understandings of the nature of criminal activity'it makes it harder for them to get in' (462). Low insists the insulation offered by the trappings of

PAGE 83

83 suburbia is false. In other words, gates and wa lls provide ideological se curity and separation but fail to deliver any actual protection from th e threat of crime. Residents simply feel safer when enclosed within a gate. Low's discussion of gated communities sp eaks to an intensified example of the fundamental thrust of suburbia: to protect wh ite, middle-class families from contamination by various forms of city filth. Bryson and Bachman co rroborate this in their de scriptions of blissful suburban life that resonate with a commonsense understandi ng of the American suburb. However, if as Low suggests, the promises of suburbia are false ones, why do these images persist? Why do Americans continue to reside in a suburb that perhaps does not insulate them from the city? What is at stake for those w ho do not fit within the prototypical model of suburbanite? Eugenides novels begin to answer some of these questions through his literary representation of suburbia. Lega l scholar Susan Frelich Appleton merges the questions raised by his critique with contemporary issues about human rights and gay marriage. Using Middlesex as a bridge between fictive identities and the assump tions they reflect in society, Appleton poses a new question: Given his [Cal's] unusual sexual ci rcumstances, what effect does this protagonist with such a winning personality have on our under standing of sex and gender, and in turn, the way the law approaches these categories? (393). Appleton's reading of Cal as a useful tool for humanizing difference shows how literature can be employed to effect real change. She argu es that a mainstream view of American society emerges from the world that people encounter in books, movies, theater and the media (394). Thus they provide discursive space for imagini ng American differently a nd incorporating various deviations from gender and sexual norms. Because Cal is an approachable and likable narrator,

PAGE 84

84 the reader wants him to succeed a nd celebrates his personal triumph. Middlesex humanizes an intersexed character whose actualized counterpa rt remains invisible and marginalized in American society. Appleton ar gues that literary characters such as Cal serve as thought experiments about the forks in the road that lie ahead in the realm of legal change, LGBTQ rights and overall soci al consciousness (396). The readings of Eugenides' novels presented in this paper, along with Appleton's analysis of Middlesex in a legal context suggest that the literary space of suburbia always already informs socio-historical scholarship a bout any actual place. To ignore the constructedness of the image and the intense labor required to maintain it is to miss the central purpose of the image in the first place: to create and sustain an American identity that is white, middle-class, heterosexual and suburban. Further interdisciplinary work promises to elucidate the consequences of perpetuating the image of suburbia and point to new imaginative spaces that account for the diverse population of the American suburb.

PAGE 85

85 LIST OF REFERENCES Ahm ed, Sara. Queer Phenomenology: Orientations, Objects, Others Durham: Duke University Press, 2006. Appleton, Susan Frelich. Gender, Law, and Na rrative: Contesting Gender in Popular Culture and Family Law: Middlesex and Other Transgender Tales Indiana Law Journal 80Ind L.J. 391 (Spring 2005): 391. Baumgartner, M.P. The Moral Order of a Suburb New York: Oxford University press, 1988. Baxandall, Rosalyn and Elizabeth Ewen. Picture Windows: How the Suburbs Happened New York: Basic Books, 2000. Beauregard, Robert A. When America Became Suburban Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 2006. Berger, Bennett M. The Myth of Suburbia. The End of Innocence: A Suburban Reader Ed. Charles M. Haar. Glenview: Scott, Foresman and Company, 1972. Brekhus, Wayne H. Peacocks, Chameleons, Centaurs: Gay Suburbia and the Grammar of Social Identity Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 2003. Chandler, Marylin R. Voices Crying in the Suburbs Suburbia Re-examined. Ed. Barbara M. Kelly. Westport: Ho fstra University, 1989. 215. Clapson, Mark. Suburban Century: Social Change and Urban Growth in England and the United States. Oxford: Berg, 2003. Cohen, Anthony P. The Symbolic Construction of Community. New York: Tavistock Publications, 1985. Collado-Rodriguez, Francisco. Back to Myth and Ethical Compromise : Garcia Mrquezs Traces on Jeffrey Eugenidess The Virgin Suicides Atlantis 27.2 (December 2005): 27. --------. Of Self and Country: U.S. Politics, Cult ural Hybridity and Ambivalent Identity in Jeffrey Eugenidess Middlesex The International Fiction Review 33 (2006): 71. Donaldson, Scott. The Suburban Myth. New York: Columbia University Press, 1969. Eugenides, Jeffrey. Middlesex. New York: Picador, 2004. --------. The Virgin Suicides New York: Warner Books, 1993. Fenton, Steve. Ethnicity: Racism, Class and Culture Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, Inc., 1999

PAGE 86

86 Fishman, Robert. Bourgeois Utopias: The Rise and Fall of Suburbia New York: Basic Books, Inc., 1987. Friedan, Betty. The Feminine Mystique New York: Norton, 1963. Halberstam, Judith In a Queer Time and Place: Tr ansgender Bodies, Subcultural Lives. New York: New York University Press, 2005. Harr, Charles M. Ed. The End of Innocence: A Suburban Reader Glenview: Scott, Foresman and Company, 1972. Hayden, Delores, Redesigning the American Dream: The Future of Housing, Work, and Family Life New York: W.W. Norton and Company, 1984. Kenny, Lorraine Delia. Daughters of Suburbia: Growing up Wh ite, Middle Class and Female New Brunswick, New Jersey: Rutgers University Press, 2000. Kenyon, Amy Maria. Dreaming Suburbia: Detroit and the Production of Postwar Space and Culture. Detroit: Wayne State University Press, 2004. Kramer, John. Ed. North American Suburbs: Politics, Diversity and Change Berkeley: The Glendessary Press, 1972. Lake, Robert C. The New Suburbanites: Race and Housing in the Suburbs New Brunswick: Rutgers, 1981. Langdon, Phillip. A Better Place to Live: Re shaping the American Suburb Amherst: The University of Massachusetts Press, 1994. Lea, Daniel. Urban Thrall: Renegotiating the Suburban Self in Nick Hornsbys Fever Pitch and High Fidelity. Expanding Suburbia: Reviewing Suburban Narratives Ed.Roger Webster. New York: Berghahn Books, 2000. 141. Loewen, James. W. Sundown Towns: A Hidden Dimension of American Racism New York: New Press, 2005. Low, Setha. Behind the Gates: Life, Securi ty, and the Pursuit of Happiness in Fortress America. The Suburb Reader. Eds. Becky M. Nicolaides and Andrew Weise. New York: Routledge, 2006. 461. Marcus, Daniel. Happy Days and Wonder Years: The Fift ies and the Sixties in Contemporary Cultural Politics. New Brunswick, New Jersey: Rutg ers University Press, 2004. Muller, Peter O. Contemporary Suburban America. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall Inc. 1981.

PAGE 87

87 Mumford, Lewis. Suburbia: The End of a Dream. The End of Innocence: A Suburban Reader. Ed. Charles M. Haar. Glenview : Scott, Foresman and Company, 1972. 5. Nicolaides, Becky M. and A ndrew Weise. Introduction. The Suburb Reader. Eds. Becky M. Nicolaides and Andrew Weise. New York: Routledge, 2006. 1. Perin, Constance. Belonging in America: Reading Between the Lines. Madison: The University of Wisconsin Press, 1988. Price, Joanna. Between Subdivisions and S hopping Malls: Signifying Ev eryday Life in the Contemporary American South. Expanding Suburbia: Reviewing Suburban Narratives. Ed. Roger Webster. New York: Berghahn Books, 2000. 125. Report of the Presidents Task Force on Suburban Problems. The End of Innocence: A Suburban Reader. Ed. Charles M. Haar. Glenvi ew: Scott, Foresman and Company, 1972. 13. Rubinowitz, Leonard S. and James E. Rosenbaum. Crossing the Class and Color Lines: From Public Housing to White Suburbia. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 2000. Schiff, James. A Conversation with Jeffrey Eugenides. The Missouri Review 29.3 (2006): 100. Stokes, Mason. The Color of Sex: Whiteness, Hetero sexuality and the Fictions of White Supremacy. Durham: Duke University Press, 2001. Warner Jr., Sam Bass. Introduction: When Suburbs are the City Suburbia Re-examined. Ed. Barbara M. Kelly. Westport: Hofstra University, 1989. 1. Webster, Roger, ed. Introduction. Expanding Suburbia: Reviewing Suburban Narratives. By Webster. New York: Berghahn Books, 2000. 1. Wilson, Sloan. The Man in the Gray Flannel Suit. 1955. New York: Thunders Mouth Press, 1983. Whyte, William H. The Organization Man. New York: Doubleday, 1956. Womack, Kenneth and Amy Mallory-Kani Why don't you just leave it up to nature?: An Adaptationist Reading of the N ovels of Jeffrey Eugenides. Mosaic 40.3 (2007): 157 174. Wood, Robert C. Suburbia: Its People and Their Politics Boston: The Riverside Press Cambridge, 1958

PAGE 88

88 BIOGRAPHICAL SKETCH Mallo ry Szymanski received her Bachelor of Arts degree in English and history from the University of Florida in 2006. This thesis marks the culmination of her work toward a Master of Arts degree in women's studies.