<%BANNER%>

Ashes to Ashes

Permanent Link: http://ufdc.ufl.edu/UFE0022171/00001

Material Information

Title: Ashes to Ashes Trauma, History, and the Ethics of Allegorical Memory in Post 9/11 Literature
Physical Description: 1 online resource (69 p.)
Language: english
Publisher: University of Florida
Place of Publication: Gainesville, Fla.
Publication Date: 2008

Subjects

Subjects / Keywords: allegory, cormac, katherine, september, the, trauma, triangle
English -- Dissertations, Academic -- UF
Genre: English thesis, M.A.
bibliography   ( marcgt )
theses   ( marcgt )
government publication (state, provincial, terriorial, dependent)   ( marcgt )
born-digital   ( sobekcm )
Electronic Thesis or Dissertation

Notes

Abstract: The post 9/11 era, considered in its development, reveals at least two contradictory political narratives originating from the Bush administration and mass media; each having attempted to situate the sociopolitical magnitude of the event into a coherent framework of signification. While the first strategy has promoted the suggestion of a repetition of history insofar as it associates the event of September 11th with the nationalist rhetoric of World War II, the second strategy has dislocated the event from any historical continuity, claiming that the event, far from having any historical precedent, irreparably alters the present historical situation ('Nothing will ever be the same'). This project argues that while these political narratives have adopted a historical model which situates 9/11's evental site into a framework of 'homogenous' and 'empty time,' recent contemporary novels fictionalizing the historical and political consequences of 9/11 have promoted alternative narratives of historical memory challenging the ethico-political efficacy of this historical framework. In particular, Katherine Weber's Triangle (2006) and Cormac McCarthy's The Road (2007) have allegorized the traumatic upheaval of 9/11 in conjunction with disparate historical traumatic contexts: the Triangle Shirtwaist Fire of 1911, and Hiroshima and Nagasaki, respectively. These particular allegorical representation, then, promote a different modality of history, in which the present is conceived as an uncanny site of uneven temporalities. That is to say, both novels use the allegorical trope of ash and burning as the means by which to represent this collusion of historical temporalities; thus the traumatic rupture of September 11th allows history to be read in new, provocatively unfamiliar ways. I will therefore show how this recent proliferation of allegorical representation also produces a specific ethico-political relation to these different historical traumatic contexts. This particular ethical dimension is, in turn, constructed through the way in which the allegorical trope's formal structure, as an instance of the imaginary register, fails to enact a closure of signification, simultaneously maintaining two disparate historical memories without a final movement of resolution. To the extent that these allegorical narratives highlight rather than occlude the Real of September 11th, these narratives remain ethically sutured to the 'ruins of history,' destabilizing the dominant symbolic narratives by which the Bush administration and mass media have attempted to domesticate this trauma.
General Note: In the series University of Florida Digital Collections.
General Note: Includes vita.
Bibliography: Includes bibliographical references.
Source of Description: Description based on online resource; title from PDF title page.
Source of Description: This bibliographic record is available under the Creative Commons CC0 public domain dedication. The University of Florida Libraries, as creator of this bibliographic record, has waived all rights to it worldwide under copyright law, including all related and neighboring rights, to the extent allowed by law.
Thesis: Thesis (M.A.)--University of Florida, 2008.
Local: Adviser: Wegner, Phillip E.

Record Information

Source Institution: UFRGP
Rights Management: Applicable rights reserved.
Classification: lcc - LD1780 2008
System ID: UFE0022171:00001

Permanent Link: http://ufdc.ufl.edu/UFE0022171/00001

Material Information

Title: Ashes to Ashes Trauma, History, and the Ethics of Allegorical Memory in Post 9/11 Literature
Physical Description: 1 online resource (69 p.)
Language: english
Publisher: University of Florida
Place of Publication: Gainesville, Fla.
Publication Date: 2008

Subjects

Subjects / Keywords: allegory, cormac, katherine, september, the, trauma, triangle
English -- Dissertations, Academic -- UF
Genre: English thesis, M.A.
bibliography   ( marcgt )
theses   ( marcgt )
government publication (state, provincial, terriorial, dependent)   ( marcgt )
born-digital   ( sobekcm )
Electronic Thesis or Dissertation

Notes

Abstract: The post 9/11 era, considered in its development, reveals at least two contradictory political narratives originating from the Bush administration and mass media; each having attempted to situate the sociopolitical magnitude of the event into a coherent framework of signification. While the first strategy has promoted the suggestion of a repetition of history insofar as it associates the event of September 11th with the nationalist rhetoric of World War II, the second strategy has dislocated the event from any historical continuity, claiming that the event, far from having any historical precedent, irreparably alters the present historical situation ('Nothing will ever be the same'). This project argues that while these political narratives have adopted a historical model which situates 9/11's evental site into a framework of 'homogenous' and 'empty time,' recent contemporary novels fictionalizing the historical and political consequences of 9/11 have promoted alternative narratives of historical memory challenging the ethico-political efficacy of this historical framework. In particular, Katherine Weber's Triangle (2006) and Cormac McCarthy's The Road (2007) have allegorized the traumatic upheaval of 9/11 in conjunction with disparate historical traumatic contexts: the Triangle Shirtwaist Fire of 1911, and Hiroshima and Nagasaki, respectively. These particular allegorical representation, then, promote a different modality of history, in which the present is conceived as an uncanny site of uneven temporalities. That is to say, both novels use the allegorical trope of ash and burning as the means by which to represent this collusion of historical temporalities; thus the traumatic rupture of September 11th allows history to be read in new, provocatively unfamiliar ways. I will therefore show how this recent proliferation of allegorical representation also produces a specific ethico-political relation to these different historical traumatic contexts. This particular ethical dimension is, in turn, constructed through the way in which the allegorical trope's formal structure, as an instance of the imaginary register, fails to enact a closure of signification, simultaneously maintaining two disparate historical memories without a final movement of resolution. To the extent that these allegorical narratives highlight rather than occlude the Real of September 11th, these narratives remain ethically sutured to the 'ruins of history,' destabilizing the dominant symbolic narratives by which the Bush administration and mass media have attempted to domesticate this trauma.
General Note: In the series University of Florida Digital Collections.
General Note: Includes vita.
Bibliography: Includes bibliographical references.
Source of Description: Description based on online resource; title from PDF title page.
Source of Description: This bibliographic record is available under the Creative Commons CC0 public domain dedication. The University of Florida Libraries, as creator of this bibliographic record, has waived all rights to it worldwide under copyright law, including all related and neighboring rights, to the extent allowed by law.
Thesis: Thesis (M.A.)--University of Florida, 2008.
Local: Adviser: Wegner, Phillip E.

Record Information

Source Institution: UFRGP
Rights Management: Applicable rights reserved.
Classification: lcc - LD1780 2008
System ID: UFE0022171:00001


This item has the following downloads:


Full Text

PAGE 1

ASHES TO ASHES: TRAUMA, HISTORY, AND THE ETHICS OF ALLEGORICAL MEMORY IN POST 9/11 LITERATURE By CHRISTOPHER COWLEY A THESIS PRESENTED TO THE GRADUATE SCHOOL OF THE UNIVERSITY OF FLOR IDA IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF ARTS UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA 2008 1

PAGE 2

2008 Christopher Cowley 2

PAGE 3

To my GrandfatherH.L. Robinson; your memory is a source of constant inspiration. 3

PAGE 4

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS The completion of this thesis is a testament to the fact that, regardless of however much the writing process feels like a forlorn and solita ry affair, it is really never anything but an engagement and rapport with others This thesis is dedicated to a number of others: for without their commitment, guidance, erudition, and understanding, this thesis could not have even been a remote possibility. First, I would like to tha nk my committee for their unwarra nted and patient direction, without which my development as a writer and scholar would surely have suffered immensely. Specifically, I want to express my deepest grat itude to Phil Wegner, w hose direction as chair pushed this project into avenues I would not have otherwise noted or followed. I would also like to especially thank Stephanie Smith and Eric Kligerman: the many hours spent in their office and classrooms completely altered my image of what being a scholar and mentor means. Finally, I want to acknowledge the entire English Depa rtmentboth faculty and stafffor both allowing me the opportunity to grow as a scholar and fo r making the transition to graduate student and instructor as seamless and as enriching as possible. Next, there is really no way to articulate my indebtedness to all of my peers and colleagues, whose incalculable correspondence a nd support not only helped cultivate my ideas, but who, thankfully, also allowed me to call th em my friends along the way. Thus I give my most earnest appreciation to two of my closest friends, Joshua Coonrod and Richard Paeztheir constant reassurance, advice, humor, hum ility, and home-cooked meals nourished my mind, soul, and, especially, my stomach. And, of course none of my graduate experience would have been possible without the scholarly and friendly counsel of my best friends, Justin Litaker and Lee Hallford, and my undergraduate ment or, Becky McClaughlin, whose insistent encouragement convincing me to pursue my academic interests was the foundation upon which 4

PAGE 5

everything else proceeds. And, finally, I would like to thank my partner, Sara Parsons, for never allowing me to become discouraged during such a stressful period. To close, I would like to give my utmost gratitude and love to my mother, father, and grandmother: without all of th eir love, support, and encouragement over the years, I would not even be a shadow of the person I am now. I can only hope they accept this thesis as an affirmation validating and confirmi ng all of the loving sacrifices th eyve made over the years. 5

PAGE 6

TABLE OF CONTENTS page ACKNOWLEDGMENTS...............................................................................................................4 ABSTRACT.....................................................................................................................................7 1 PROBLEMS AND OBJECTIVES...........................................................................................9 2 ALLEGORIES OF HISTORY OR, BLA STING OPEN THE CONTINUUM OF HISTORY.............................................................................................................................17 3 FROM THE ASCH BUILDING TO THE ASHES OF GROUND ZERO............................30 4 ASHES OF AMERICAN FLAGS..........................................................................................49 LIST OF REFERENCES...............................................................................................................66 BIOGRAPHICAL SKETCH.........................................................................................................69 6

PAGE 7

Abstract of Thesis Presen ted to the Graduate School of the University of Florida in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Masters of Arts ASHES TO ASHES: TRAUMA, HISTORY, AND THE ETHICS OF ALLEGORICAL MEMORY IN POST 9/11 LITERATURE By Christopher Cowley May 2008 Chair: Phillip Wegner Major: English The post 9/11 era, considered in its deve lopment, reveals at least two contradictory political narratives originating from the Bu sh administration and mass mediaeach having attempted to situate the sociopol itical magnitude of th e event into a coherent framework of signification. While the first strategy has promot ed the suggestion of a repetition of history insofar as it associates the event of September 11th with the nationalist rhetoric of World War II, the second strategy has dislocated the event from any historical conti nuity, claiming that the event, far from having any historical precedent, irre parably alters the presen t historical situation (Nothing will ever be the same). This project argues that while these political narratives have adopted a historical model which situates 9/11s ev ental site into a framework of homogenous and empty time, recent contemporary novels fictionalizi ng the historical and political consequences of 9/11 have promoted alternative narratives of historical me mory challenging the ethico-political efficacy of this historical framework. In particular, Katherine Webers Triangle (2006) and Cormac McCarthys The Road (2007) have allegorized the traumatic upheaval of 9/11 in conjunction 7

PAGE 8

8 with disparate historical trauma tic contexts: the Triangle Shirtw aist Fire of 1911, and Hiroshima and Nagasaki, respectively. These particular alle gorical representation, then, promote a different modality of history, in which the present is conceived as an uncanny s ite of uneven temporalities. That is to say, both novels use the allegorical trope of ash and bur ning as the means by which to represent this collusion of historical temporalities; t hus the traumatic rupture of September 11th allows history to be read in new, provocatively unfamiliar ways. I will therefore show how this recent proliferation of allegorical representation also produces a specific ethico-political relation to these different historical traumatic contexts. This particular ethical dimension is, in turn, constructed through the way in whic h the allegorical tropes formal structure, as an instance of the imaginary register, fails to enact a closur e of signification, simulta neously maintaining two disparate historical memories without a final move ment of resolution. To the extent that these allegorical narratives highlight rather than occlude the Real of September 11th, these narratives remain ethically sutured to the ruins of histor y, destabilizing the dominant symbolic narratives by which the Bush administration and mass media have attempted to domesticate this trauma.

PAGE 9

CHAPTER 1 PROBLEMS AND OBJECTIVES The post 9/11 era, considered in its developm ent, reveals at least two conflicting political narratives that have originated from the Bush administration and mass media. Though each narrative has been underscored by a similar political agenda, and while both narratives have attempted to stabilize the sociopolitical ramifications of the even t into a coherent context of signification, their contradictor y content has largely been a re sult of each narratives specific politicization of the present. The first of these strategies has been prin cipally historical in content: this strategy has attempted to draw a distinct correlation between September 11th and the Japanese attack on Pearl Harbor, while the subsequent war on te rror also has been associated with the United States involvement in World Wa r II. This mapping of hi storical equivalences not only immediately codified September 11th as a precipitant act of wareven when the identity of a culprit against which a response was to be made was not immediately at handbut it also inevitability consigned this response to one belonging primarily to a global military operation. Consequently, when the id entification of a culprit solidified into th e distinct yet still vague designation of Al Qaeda, the fundamental link between the ideolo gies of fascism and Islamic extremism was immediately established. Thus only three months after 9/11 the specificity of these historical actualities was erased in order to promote the suggestion of an unequivo cal return to, and repetition of, the historicopolitical situation of World War II. During his media address on Pearl Harbor Day in 2001, President Bush explicitly linked the contemporar y threat of modern terrorism with fascism, stating that American had seen this [threat] before: the terrorists are the heirs to fascism Like all fascists, the terrorists cannot be appeased : they must be defeated. This struggle will not 9

PAGE 10

end in a truce or treaty. It will end in victory fo r the United States, our friends and the cause of freedom. Here a nationalist commemoration of Pearl Harbor is appr opriated in order to construct a tripartite schema c onsisting of the Japanese attack on Pearl Harbor, the terrorist attack of September 11th, and the rise of the Nazi regime in Germanyradically distorting the complexity of the historico-political contexts that constitute each of these events. Indeed, this conflation of modern terrorism with National Socialism not only deploy s a dubious analogy; as Maja Zehfuss argues, it also furt her reinforces the notion that th e United States involvement in the Second World War can be exclusively defined as a Good War, a her oic fight for freedom against the absolute evil of its adversaries effectively obscuring the USs own destructive action in World War II (Zehfuss 101). Likewise, while imagery of Iwo Jima has been incessantly evoked since September 11thin which the deliberate visual association of firefighters hoisting the American flag at Ground Zero directly alludes to the iconic images of the battle of Iwo Jimathe historical memory of both Pearl Harbor and Iwo Jima has coalesced into a historical matrix that effaces the very final solution of this conflict. Ad am Lowenstein argues that, since September 11th, this juxtaposition of historical phenom ena has rewritten the United Stat es role in the Pacific during World War II, once again, into a narrative of milita ry heroism. If, according to Lowenstein, this juxtaposition inevitably codifies Hiroshima as a justified solution to Pearl Harbor, this analogy also effectively occludes Hiroshimas own Ground Zero in the process (Lowenstein 181). Thus despite the lack of salient similarities between September 11th and these disparate historical events, this return and recourse to nationalist memory has been promoted, according to Zehfuss, precisely because it is not certain that the war on terror is a glorious fight for freedom (Zehfuss 102). The political significance of the Bush administra tions invocations of 10

PAGE 11

memory, then, proposes that t he present is like the past an d that therefore doing what was right then will also be right now (Zehfuss 102). Th is rhetorical appeal to the historical memory of World War II also infamously laid the ground work for the eventual war against Iraq, when President Bush referred to the rogue nations of Iraq, Iran, and North Korea as the Axis of Evil. The second dominant narrative, however, co mpletely refuses the suggestion of any historical equivalence in relation to the event and the ensuing war on terror. This secondary strategy attests to the ab solute singularity of the event, main taining that the event of September 11th represents a total break with the past. The part icular rhetoric of this strategy proposes that everything has changed since 9/11, or that America, nay the world, will no longer be the same. The ahistorical content of this strategy, in wh ich any relation with a hi storical framework is discarded, implies that the US was irreparably al tered from the event and that, moreover, the specific formal aspect of the attack has justif ied the drastic modification of the United States domestic and foreign policies. To the extent th at this narrative strategy discards any and all historical contextualization, it similarl y blurs the specificity of September 11th by isolating the event from any historical continuity. As Rex Bu tler and Scott Stephens co ntends, the ahistorical nature of this strategy, far from contending w ith the sociopolitical magnitude of the event, merely reproduces ideological co-ordinates, fo r it is only the hollow attempt to say something deep without knowing what to say (Butler a nd Stephens 2). Analogously, Jacques Derrida, in his interviews with Jrgen Habermas, stressed th e necessity of reflecting on the ideological coordinates which designate 9/11 as an unprecedente d event, since this injunction advocating the categorical, ahistorical nature of the event is less spontaneous than it actually appears (Derrida 86). Rather this response, according to Derri da, has to a large extent [been] conditioned, 11

PAGE 12

constituted, if not actually c onstructedby means of a prodigi ous techno-social-political machine (Derrida 86). The political undertones of each strategy, then, displaces the specificity of September 11th into a politics of memory that blurs the distinct perimeters of the events situated-ness in a precise moment of history, as well as the particul ar sociopolitical forces that contributed to the event. Furthermore, the disparate content of th ese strategieswhich declares that September 11th has historical analogues, while simultaneous ly denying the event hi storical precedence functions not only to legitimize th e current administrations political agendas. It also radically diminishes both the viability and legibility of alternative narratives of memory and history, through the way in which the dominance of th ese strategies has limited the discursive possibilities of contextualiz ation. That is to say, since these rhet orical interpretive strategies both occupy and polarize the event, not only politicizing the memory of September 11th but also, in the process, other significant moments of US hist ory, competing narratives of historical memory become marginalized or suppressed. The rapidity with which these strategies were assimilated into popular discourse attests to this radical reduction of alterna tive narratives. Narratives which promoted the necessity of reflecting on the presen t situation before hurried military retaliation, interrogated the historical events directly im plicating the contemporary, and focused collective mourning on lives lost rather than on tendentious political agendasall of these were relegated outside the prevailing po litical conversation. The past few years, however, have witne ssed a marked increase in a growing body of fictional work that has engaged the cultural and political ramifications of September 11th. Though this increase is not altogether surprisi ng given the considerable geopolitical magnitude of the event, it is sign ificant that each of these novels has at tempted to historicize and politicize 12

PAGE 13

the memory of September 11th against these dominant strategi es and have, conversely, offered alternative narratives of historical memory. Indeed, Jonathan S. Foers Extremely Loud and Incredibly Close (2005), William Gibsons Pattern Recognition (2003), Don Delillos The Falling Man (2007), and Art Spiegelmans In the Shadow of No Towers (2004) have all, to some extent, ventured to locate the cultural a nd historical specificity of September 11th in diverse and politically challenging framewor ks of contextualization. Each of these narratives promotes a model of historical engagement that undermin es the political mystifi cations of the Bush administration. In particular, Foers Extremely Loud and Incredibly Close works to situate September 11th alongside the traumatic historical lineage of the bombings of Hiroshima and Dresden: his confrontation with the underbelly of the United St ates military history seems to suggest that the complexity of September 11th can be significantly confronted only after a direct engagement with, and a return to, Americas own violent past. Foers focus, then, on how collective traumas of the past implicate the present acknowledges that th e present itself is modified as a result of the re-politicization of history that has taken place since September 11th. Conversely, Don Delillos 9/11 novel, The Falling Man has been one of the few narra tives to resist historical contextualization. This resistance, however, is itself deeply politic al gesture, I would argue, since Delillos project appears to be an attempt to return to the tr auma of September 11th without the political rhetoric that has acco mpanied the event. In fact, The Falling Man seems to indicate that we are still too close to the even t to assess its larger sociopolitical significance, to place it into a definitive context of historical meaning. For Delill o, it is the traumatic image of the Falling Man who, forever suspended in horrifying abeyance, works to disrupt the closure of September 11th, reinforcing the historical immedi acy of the event. C ounteracting narratives that have attempted 13

PAGE 14

to domesticate the event through po litically dubious strategies, The Falling Man suggests that the present is still too tenuous and over-determined to consign the tr auma of 9/11 to a historical closure. But whereas these novels have directly dealt with the repercussions of the aftermath of 9/11, along with the events broader context in history, other contemporar y novels have taken up these issues in more oblique, allegorical repr esentations. Novels such as Cormac McCarthys The Road and Katherine Webers The Triangle, in particular, have al legorized the events of September 11th together with past collective trau mas of the twentieth century. Whereas The Road conflates images of Hiroshima and September 11th in the form of an ashen post-apocalyptic America, Triangle draws a distinct relation between th e Triangle Shirtwaist Fire of 1911 and September 11th through allegorical descrip tions of falling, burning bodies. Though each novel differs significantly in both stylistic and thematic approaches, it is this collusion of historical temporality through reoccurring allegorical tropes of ash and burning that place 9/11 along side historically and politically di ssimilar contexts of memory. Ra ther than upholding conventional politics of memory, the use of historical allegory in these novels not only counteracts the proliferation of repeated images that followe d the event but its unfamiliar context of memory undermines the nationalistic rhetoric that has pe rmeated political discourse since September 11th. What specifically sets these tw o allegorical novels from those just discussed is how the immediate historical situation is represented as the eruptive return of past historic al traumas into the present. Additionally these novels suggest a more intimat e relation to history than perhaps those formally discussed: that is, the allegori cal tropes of ash and burning structure a specific ethical dimension through the very textual perf ormance of their allego rical representation. The pervasive use of ash and fire in these novels is allegorical in sofar as they both signify and 14

PAGE 15

coordinate a distinct dialecti cal relation between September 11th and another traumatic historical context: Hiroshima in The Road and the Triangle Shirtwaist Fire in Triangle While fire and burning serve as the tropes of the Real through which both historical traumas are constituted, ash becomes the constituent allegorica l image of the remainder of this Real as traumatic encounter, reconfiguring the memory of each historical trauma in relation to a broader historical context. Thus, the allegorical relationship maintained in these narratives implies that the present is determined and constituted by a process akin to the returned of the repressed, but only insofar as this symbolic return presents new configurations of history. Particularly, both Triangle and The Road promote a modality of history in which the present, blasted open by the traumatic rupture of September 11th, reorients our relationship to th e past in provocatively new, and ultimately more politically ethical, configurations Finally, these allegorical narratives suggest that, through the very intimate correspondences be tween historical traumatic events, an ethicopolitical alternative to current po litical discourse is sheltered. My objective here, then, is twofold: the firs t part of this thesis will lay down the theoretical dimensions of this emergent al legorical tendency, while the second part will demonstrate the various ethicopolitical implications of this allegorical dimension through a detailed discussion of Katherine Webers Triangle and Cormac McCarthys The Road Relying heavily upon Walter Benjamins theo ries of allegory, I will contend that this recent allegorical impulse is not only a result of a counter-narrati ve of political memory that opens up a broader consideration toward past collective trauma, but th at it is also coextensive with a concomitant crisis of representation engendered by the collective trauma of September 11th. My argument will attempt to synthesize the histor ical dimension of allegory via Benjamin with the referential problems of traumatic experience. Insofar as Be njamins notions of allegory are principally 15

PAGE 16

16 historical in character, thereby acknowledging the ruins or the Real of history, this thesis will argue that the allegorical trea tment of history in these novels corresponds to the belated, discontinuous temporality of traumatic experi ence. This synthesis will show the recent proliferation of allegorical re presentation opens up different configurations of historyeach producing a specific ethico-political relation to these histories. This particular ethical dimension is, in turn, constructed through the way in which th e allegorical tropes form al structure, as an instance of the imaginary register, fails to enact a closure of signification, simultaneously maintaining two disparate historic al memories without a final move ment of resolution. To the extent that these allegorical na rratives highlight rather than oc clude the Real of September 11th, these narratives remain ethically sutured to the impasse of this Real, destabilizing the dominant symbolic narratives by which the Bush admini stration and mass media have attempted to domesticate this trauma. In his Shocking Representations, Adam Lowenstein claims that the allegorical encounter with historical trauma entails an opening out to complex and often contra dictory representations, where unexpected recombinations and disfigurements of history can occur (Lowenstein 50). It is, then, this collision between temporalities, between history and fiction, which produces the allegorical moment of defamilia rizationor, as Lowenstein calls it, working off Benjamins theory of allegory, moments of representative s hock. This shock of representation, produced by the uncanny nature of the narratives symbolic repetitionalong with th e eruption of the past into presentreinscribes the sign ificance of previous traumas in to the contemporary, serving as an ethical expansion to, rather than a domesticati on of, the memories of these collective traumas.

PAGE 17

CHAPTER 2 ALLEGORIES OF HISTORY OR, BLASTING OPEN THE CONTINUUM OF HISTORY What these particular descriptions make mani fest is that September 11th signals both the break from the decade following the Cold War which solidified the United States as the uncontested proponent of a global neo-liberal agendaand the emer gence of and entry into a new historical situation1. Needless to say, while the period of the Cold War provided the United States prevailing political narratives with which to forward and legitimize its assorted political programs (despite intermittent historical situations such as the Vietnam War which temporarily disturbed their coherence), the decade of th e 90s similarly marshaled political narratives suggesting the end of history. This political na rrative, articulated most concisely in Francis Fuyuhamas neo-Hegelian study, The End of History and the Last Man contended that the end of the global communist project, i.e. the fall of the Berlin Wall, fu lly sanctions and validates the neo-liberal agenda as the end goal of history. Fu rthermore, this new project, defined by the diffusion of democratization and ca pitalization to the rest of the underdeveloped world, also fully exposed and legitimized capitalisms ultimate dr eam: the desire to unleash the absolute, uncontested deterratorialized flows of capita l throughout the entire world. Though this period announced the installation of a new historical s ituation, where the horizon or objective towards an objective future was perhaps more ambiguous than during the years of the Cold War, September 11th inaugurated a break with both of these political narratives and objectives. Political historian Harry Harootunian, however, provides a diffe rent interpretation of the political narratives of the 1990s, esp ecially as it relates to September 11th. While Harootunian concedes that since 9/11 there has been a sw elling chorus of opinion aimed at demonstrating 1 This point is highly indebted to Phillip Wegners forthcoming book project, Life Between Two Deaths: US Culture, 1989-2001, forthcoming from Duke University Press 2008. 17

PAGE 18

how the destruction of the World Trade towers has constituted an event of world historical magnitude announcing the installation of a new time marked by a boundless present, he argues that the historical and tem poral upheavals of September 11th were nevertheless already present during the 90s following the fall of the communist project (Harootunian 471). Far from affecting the temporal order and upsetting the relationship between history and the tripartite division of past, present, and futu re, the events of September 11th, then, simply exposed further the asymmetry of the temporal order on a larger global scale2 (Harootunian 471). In fact, Harootunian suggests that the na rrative pronouncing the end of history was really only but the exhausted echo of this historical displacement, disclosing a narrative th at has played out its productivity and whose worn and frayed image finds itself reflected in an attempt to position the temporality of the present as endless durati on now that it no longer needs to rely on its relationship to a past and futur e (Harootunian 474). If the end of history narrative was only but a worn and frayed image, September 11th nevertheless allowed the US to once again displace and distort the geopolitical upheaval pr oduced by the fall of communism onto a broader political project connected to the expansion of democratizationthe war on terror. Thus, although Harootunian challenges the opinion that September 11th constituted an event of world historical magnitude, I w ould argue that it wa s indeed September 11th, conceptualized now as a repetition of the Real produced by the fall of the Berlin Wall3, which not only fully exposed the histor ical unevenness of the geopolit ical and economic ordermost explicitly the prevalence of radical fundamentalismsbut also compounded the problem insofar 2 One could argue, however, that Harootunian sees Hurricane Katrina, rather than September 11th, as the event which exposed most fully the problems with the current temporal order, since, according to Harootunian, it was Hurricane Katrina that was able to easily rip off the veneer of the present to reveal an endurin g and deep-seated historical unevenness (Harootunian 475). 3 Again, I must give full credit to Phil Wegner on this point, as his article Periodizing the Cold War in Don Delillos Underworld makes clear the political and historical stakes of Zizeks formulation of symbolic repetition. 18

PAGE 19

as it allowed the US to fully embrace this narra tive and legitimize its political agendas after September 11th. Indeed, Zizek has provided the theoretica l perspective by which to conceptualize the actualization of this retroa ctive accumulation of symbolic meaning. As Zizek argues, the symbolic status of an event changes retroactivel y with its symbolic repetition: whereas the first eruption is experienced as a contingent trauma, it is through its subseque nt repetition that the event is recognized in its symbolic necessity it finds its place in the symbolic network (Zizek 61). In short, I am argui ng that if the fall of the Berlin Wall, as the first eruption of the Real, constituted the initial destab ilization of political narratives describing the historical present and future, it was the repetition of this eventSeptember 11ththat most fully revealed the destabilization and unevenness of this historico-political order. This discussion, then, allows for a different re ading of the narrative threads that I have been delineating. What we have seen since 9/11, both in political discourse and from cultural production, is a hyperactive production of interpretiv e practice beset with contextual strategies attempting to politicize and historicize the pres ent, or what Harootuni an calls the boundless present. Both of these representational prac ticespolitical discourse and literary production re-politicized history in an atte mpt to describe and contextualize the lack of substantive symbolic strategies available to coordina te the effect of September 11th on the present and future. Indeed, from both sides of the political spectrum, the desire to integrate and foreclose September 11th into a stable historical contex t has been one of the primary political agendas having emerged since the aftermath of the event. Thus, the traj ectory that Ive been trying to trace suggests a trenchant polarization of history. On the one hand, the Bush Administrations politicization of September 11th as a return to the political and military struggles of World War IIwhich ultimately and simultaneously negates final hist orical analysissuggests a modality of history 19

PAGE 20

that is strictly homogenous and linear. Far from a return to history, the Bush administrations appeal to the national rhetoric of military victor ies is only but the desperate attempt to advocate the political and military models th at lead to the economic reconstructions after World War II. In effect, this modality views history as a progres sive series of obstacles, a linear movement of perpetual overcoming; its backward glance toward history suggests that th e political strategies that worked then can still be applied to the curr ent historical situation. The Bush administrations recourse to history is really nothing other than the denial of history, insofar as the 90s and September 11th are still consigned to a period of hi story which spans and includes the second World War and its aftermath. The problem of modern terrorism and the w ar on terror is thus modeled off the successful democr atization of Japan, as well as th e reformation of Europe after World War II. Indeed, one could argue that it is this notion of a boundless present of homogenous time has solidified into the new political narrative of the Bush Administration, with its endless war on terror and its call for perp etual vigilance in the face of modern terrorism without providing an alternative narr ative toward a future objective. What is more, the political narratives which have dislocated September 11th from any historical continuity allow the Bush administ ration to obscure the more deep-seated problems that emerged during 1990s. It furthermore allows the plurality of these political issues, spanning from the entry into the 1990s to the aftermath of September 11th, to be consolidated into simplified political narrative focusing al l of its emphasis on the problem of modern terrorismone which now supplements a global m ilitary dimension to the economic component that was always already inscribed in the end of hi story narrative. Consequently, this highlights the fact that, far from treating September 11th as an absolute rupt ure inaugurating a new historical situation, the present is regarded as merely another obstacle toward expanding western 20

PAGE 21

notions of democracy to political and economic spheres which are not only deemed potentially volatile but also archaic compared to the models of modernization valorized by the US and the rest of the Western world. These allegorical narratives, however, appear to politicize the return to history in a completely different fashion. The use of allegory in these novels politicizes history not only to reclaim the past and the present from political appropriation. Indeed, the performative nature of these allegorical representations also offers a completely different model of history, one which utilizes belated, discontinuous models of temporality that destabilize and expose the political narratives championing homogenous modalities of history. Whereas the Bu sh administration has effaced the specificity of historical traumatic events through its politici zation, these narratives attempt to maintain specificity through the way in which the allegorical mode works to form a certain identity in difference, bringing into view a broader framework of historical memory through the dialectical mode of its signification. These allegori cal narratives represent September 11th as a rupture of the Real that makes the sym bolic texture of history readable in new ways. Though they still posit September 11th as an absolute ruptureas an historical rupture that must be politically and ethically re-conceptualizedits reengagement with history nevertheless serves as a political project that not only reconfigures the political dimensi on of US imperialist history. It also paves the way for an alternative poli tics of memory acknowledging the imperative need for a more ethically positioned po litical objective, one which is de dicated to the constitution of a new future horizon. Both of these narrative strategies, however far they diverge, indicate that a reengagement with history is not only imperative, but that it is tantamoun t to a re-orientation of the present, insofar as the present, mark ed as a over-determined and volatile phenomenon, upsets the stability of viably familiar narrative mode s. In short, if these allegorical narratives 21

PAGE 22

highlight and advocate an ethical fidelity to someth ing like a return of the repressed of the real of history, the Bush administration denies a nd suppresses this repressed history through its adoption of a homogenous, con tinuous historical time. It is important to stress, then, the particular theoretical model with which to conceptualize these renewed historicizations opened up by September 11th. To return to the course of Harootunians examination, his description of the temporal unevenness of the historical present is markedly reminiscent of Freuds notion of the return of the repressed, calling this destabilization of homogenous time as the specter that has come back to haunt the present in the form of explosive fundame ntalism fusing the archaic and the modern (Harootunian 475) For Harootunian, nation-states and communities th at experience the upheaval caused by massive conflict or collective trauma inevitably define th e present by historicizi ng and temporalizing the asymmetrical interplay of the past and current s ituation, which suggests th at history is not only the locus of uneven rhythms, the collusion of coexisting temporalitiesit is also the scene where the ghosts of the past comingle [sic] w ith the livingin the ha bitus of a haunted house (Harootunian 478). Later, Harootunian describes the divide be tween the phenomena of history and memory as an uncanny domain, which is ineluctabl y crystallized through the transformation and codification of historiography into historical memory (Harootunian 478). This modification of Freudian concepts into a historical dimension not only approaches the sp ecific description of allegory that will need to be further discussed la ter. It also helps to show how the historical present can itself be conceived as Unheimlich which indicates that this proliferation of historicizations having o ccurred after September 11th reveals the installation of a historical situation fully effected by the unevenness of tempor al orders. Consequentl y, this formulation of 22

PAGE 23

the present as Unheimlich makes manifest the totality of the political stakes of the present, insofar as this return to history itself can be defined, a priori as a struggle to contextualize the present in relation to the September 11th. As Saul Newman convincin gly argues, Freuds return of the repressed, as the repetition through which the effect of th e uncanny is produced, can also be translated into a historical process that harbors a specific political dimension. For Newman, political action takes shapealbeit either ra dical or conservative precisely through the uncanny as a return of the repressed, especial ly when politics is understood as the attempt to construct something new, coupled with somethi ng old (Newman 117). Thus the contestation of this unfamiliar or uncanny histor ical present plays itself out as a struggle over both a politics of memory and a politics of history; to the extent that this struggle is played out through the symbolic modes of discourse, the unheimlich becomes the very site of a crisis of representation. Yet the concepts of the uncanny and the return of the repressed ar e also theoretically and thematically related to the repetition co mpulsion endemic to traumatic experience as described by psychoanalytic discourse. Thus, pe rhaps, the key component linking the phenomena of the return of the repressed, the Unheimlich and traumatic repetition is the Freudian notion of Nachtraglichkeit : the discontinuous tempor ality of traumatic experience, or the belated repetition compulsion that follows the aftermath of a traumatic en counter. History theorized in terms of Nachtraglichkeit would necessarily be one defined by belated rupture and repetition, but it also, according to Michael Rothberg, would be cons titutive of the very r eordering of the past (Rothberg 24). The concept of trauma as a ps ychical phenomenon has, of course, largely been investigated in the context of its effect on the individual. To s uggest, however, that the traumatic event of September 11th has initiated an emergent collec tive practices and production is to project a commonly designated s ubjective category onto a larger social framework. Thus, the 23

PAGE 24

term historical trauma designates and substitute s the psychical effects of traumatic effects onto the imaginary and symbolic framew orks of a collective social body4. Therefore, I am not interested in discussing the individual, subj ective components of traumatic experienced, but rather displacing the referent ial problems opened up by traumatic experience onto the symbolic category of historical production. Indeed my th eoretical framework will use the structural components of traumatic experience as a conceptu al model that helps to elucidate the process whereby historical trauma produces many of the e ffects related to the return of the repressed on the social field, through the Lacanian regist ers of the Real, Symbolic, and Imaginary. This particular schema of trauma would thus necessitate a construc tion of history as an ongoing signifying process, while the collective trauma, here September 11th, would be designated as an eruption of the Real, which w ould disrupt the stability of the symbolic and imaginary orders sustaining the social field. Slav oj izek has shown how history as a signifying process is in no way fixed into a stable framew ork of signification, but rather contends that every historical rupture, ever y advent of a new master-signi fier, changes retroactively the meaning of all tradition, restructures the narratio n of the past, makes it readable in a new way (izek 56). Under this formulation, September 11th, posited as a new master signifier into the signifying chain of history, would modify the mean ing of associated historical eventualities, since, according to Zizek, the pa st exists as it is included, as it enters (into) the synchronous net 4 My concept of collective trauma is largely lifted from Kaja Silvermans definition of historical trauma, which she delimits in her Male Subjectivity at the Margin. Tracing the modifications to dominant representations of masculinity in Hollywood films that immediately follo wed the end of World War II, Silverman defines the categorical specifications of hist orical trauma, here World War II, as a historically precipitated but psychoanalytically specific disruption, with ramifications extending far beyond the individual psyche (Silverman 55). Though Silvermans use of the co ncept is specifically situated in term s of collective traumas effect on categories of gender and sexuality particularly the functio n of masculinity as constitutive of dominant notions of ideology and social formationsthe essential theoretical implications Silverman delineates in her essay are also pertinent to this project: the capacity certain traumatic events have in disrupting the normative function of social practice; the distanciation from the ima ginary relation upheld by the social; and the fact that collective traumatic events not only have the potential to radically a lter facets of subjectivity but also cultural praxis. 24

PAGE 25

of the signifier, retroactively giving the elemen ts [of the historical past] their symbolic weight by including them in new texturesit is this el aboration which decides re troactively what they [historical events] will have been (izek56). Zi zeks theory of historical processes, borrowed from Lacans emphasis on the signifiers perf ormative function in psychical phenomena, provides an effective means by which to explain how the recent proliferati on of historicizations is not merely defined by September 11ths topical si milarities to traumatic historical contexts. Zizeks statements also highlight how September 11th, as a historical rupture, enacts the hyperactive explosion of historicization as an attempt to integrate a nd neutralize this very rupture, altering retroact ively the symbolic contextual field of other historical events. Thus, Zizeks description of history ultimately mirrors the psychical aspect of traumatic experience through the belated return of symbolic meani ng, pointing to the way in which the past and present collide in uncanny and dissimilar ways. For if the rupture of September 11th initiates something like a reordering of history, this reorie ntation, I argue, reinscribes the memory of past collective traumas in to th e contemporary present. It is precisely, here, where Walter Benjamin s theories of allegory and history can be made useful in terms of both th e model of the return of the repr essed as well as this mode of temporal unevenness defining the present. In his Origins of German Tragic Drama Benjamin suggests that allegorical practice is essentially historical in characte r. The historical specificity of the allegorical mode is in stark contrast to the signifying modality of the symbol, which was valorized by the Romantics for its transcendent, ahistorical aspect. Indeed, it is significant to stress that the crux of Benjam in investigation on the baroque Trauerspiels allegorical mode hinges around the historical dimens ion of signifying practice: for th e allegorical tendency arises, according to Benjamin, through a certain relation and attitude toward history. As Jim Hansen 25

PAGE 26

argues, Benjamins emphasis on symbolism and, subsequently, the teleol ogical unity of form and content erases the distinc tion between the transcendental and the material, appearance and essence, subject and object (Hansen 670). For Benjamin, the essentially undialectical interpretation of the symbol by the Romantics co nceals the socio-historical contexts by pointing toward moments of transcendence, in which both idea and material referent are recovered: thus, for the Romantics, the sign always precedes history. Allegory, on the other hand, which was regularly dismissed by romantic critics as fragmentary, anachronistic, and unpoetic, is reclaimed from the Romantics and exonerated by Benjamin for the way in which allegory mourns the failure of history, with its essentially ruinous aspect (H ansen 670). Therefore, one of Benjamins primary concerns is showing how the Baroque Trauerspiel implies a radically different view of history and subjectivity than the redemptive aesthetic components of tragic forms. While the symbol routinely inhabited tragedy as an expression of affirmation, where destruction is idealized and natu re is fleetingly revealed in the light of redemption, in the allegorical moments of the Baroque trauerspiel the observer is confronted with the facies hippocratica of history as petrified, primordial la ndscape (Benjamin 166). The allegorical image, unlike the tragic which emphasizes beau ty, is a fragment or ruin; as Benjamin contends, allegory thereby declares itself to be beyond beautyallegories are, in the realm of thoughts, what ruins are in the realm of things (Benjamin 178). If, for example, aesthetic and historical production for Freud is always the expression of a sublimated working-through of traumatic experience, for Benjamin this producti on is one defined by melancholia, a return of the repressed of history into the present. As an expression of historys ruin, then, Be njamin suggests that if allegories become dated, it is because it is part of their nature to shock [italics mine]. In order to shock, 26

PAGE 27

however, the allegorical represen tation must always be situated in a historically specific dimension; and what shocks is the way in which the allegorys indirect representation signifies an engagement with a historically uneven temporal order. Specifically, it is under the historical gaze of melancholy, Benjamin suggests, that th e allegorical object highlights and emerges in social contexts of transition and transfor mation (Benjamin 183). As Matthew Wilkins convincingly argues, the a llegorical tendency of the Trauerspiel results from the diminutive authority of the religious and sacred representation during th e Baroque period, in which the antagonism between secular, profane institutions and the decay of an existing sacred order begins to take shape (Wilkins 290). Accordi ng to Wilkins, then, the alternations in representational practice during the baroque pe riod areshocking in the way they defamiliarize objects even as those remain recognizable as th e understructure of what they were (Wilkins 290). The shocking aspect of the allegorical representation is engende red through the way in which, during the baroque era, its authors attempted to map out a new relationship between the sacred and the profane (Wilkins 290). This highlights the fact that, for Benjamin, the allegorical mode takes place during times of re presentation crises or social transformation: liminal historical periods in which the symbolic framework used to give cultural and political significance to this transf ormation is disrupted. Could we not suggest, then, that the allegorical tendency that has emerged is a result of an imperative to map out September 11ths impact on history, its relationship between past, present, and future? I would s uggest that, if these particular fictional narratives maintain a similar relation to history as to that which Benj amin designates as alle gorical, the dimension of history of these conservative political narratives is essentially tragic: it is tragic to the extent that these narratives utilize September 11th as a tragic fall that shelters the nostalgic opportunity of a 27

PAGE 28

return to a time of patriotic affirmation and nationalistic unification. While both narratives modes look back to history for politically rede mptive means, these allegorical representations conflation of historical traumatic contexts harbors a more polit ically radical gesture. Both Triangle and The Road work to disrupt both the monopolizati on of historical memory and the unification of heroic nationalist se ntiment inaugurated by September 11th. If Benjamins notion of hi story is not tragic bu t allegorical, then I would suggest that, much like Zizeks formulation of history, it is also one defined by the psychical model of traumatic experience. As Hansen contends, the allegorical form itselfis produced by certain kinds of historical crises (Han sen 672). In his influential The ses on the Philosophy of History, Benjamin posits a conception of history that re futes the reified notion of history as continuous, progressive, or as one of homogenous, empt y time (Benjamin 261) Rather, history, for Benjamin, conforms closely to the psychoanalyti c model of traumatic experience, in which the past blasts open the continuum of history, a collus ion of temporality, of the past and present, in the allegorical moment he calls, jeitztzeit (261). Likewise, in The Origins of the German Tragedy, this language describing histor ical phenomena is foreshowed in a passage which deals with the transition from the symbolic to the a llegorical sensibility, as it is supersedes the mystical, religious paradigm of represen tation practice: The mystical instant [ Nu] becomes the now [ Jetzt] of contemporary actuality; the symbol b ecomes distorted into the allegorical (183). The allegorical moment, much like Benjamins notion of history, engenders moments of uncanny reconfigurations, in which the past and present gain retroactive significance as they relate to one another. Moreover, as Zizek contends, Benjamin is the only Marxist thinker ever to locate the traumatic kernel around which the very opening up historic al signification is located. It is this very formal structure of Benjamin notion of history that, for Zizek, analogizes the 28

PAGE 29

29 Lacanian notion of the return of the repressed while reconceptualizin g Marxist theories of historical materialism as a revolutionary phe nomenon: Benjaminconceived history as a text, as [a] serious of events which will have beentheir meaning, their historical dimension, is decided afterward, through th eir inscription in the sym bolic order (Zizek 136). The important point to underline from this discussion of Benjamins notion of allegory and history is how the use of a llegorical representation in these novels mirrors this modality of historical temporality. The images of burning and ash in these novels function as the allegorical figures by which the past blasts open the contin uum of history, distor ting the narratives of history forwarded in these popular political discourses. In other words, as allegorical images committed to the ruins of history, the rhetoricity of ash and burning promotes a modality of history in contradistinction to the homogenous empty of the Bush administrations political narratives. Consequently, the conflation of Benj amins notion of history and psychoanalytic models of trauma that I have been delineating help s to show how the allegorical images are held in a suspended dialectic of disparate temporalities, and, at the same time, it reveals how this reemergent allegorical tendency, based on the sy mbolic repetition, thus gives new symbolic meaning to both traumatic events. The readings that I will forward will attempt to show how the modality of history represented in these novels, coordinated through the textual performance of these allegorical tropes, harbor s an addition ethical componentone which ultimately advocates the fidelity to the ruins of history.

PAGE 30

CHAPTER 3 FROM THE ASCH BUILDING TO THE ASHES OF GROUND ZERO Before the attacks on September 11th, the Triangle Shirtwaist Fire of 1911 held the notorious distinction of being the worst disaster in New York City history. Trapped on the 9th floor of the burning Asch building, one hundred a nd forty-two workers died attempting to escape from their workspaces, which had quickly become an inferno. Many of the workers, forced to leap from the windows, plummeted to their d eath to evade the intense heat and suffocating smoke, while others were either burned alive or trampled to death trying to escape through the one unlocked exit. Considering that the modern cityscapes of large metr opolitan areas had begun to proliferate all over the US, the specific hor ror engendered by the descriptions and first-hand accounts of the burning, falling bodies of these work ers surely must have severely haunted the collective imaginary of both New York City and th e nation at large. At the time, however, the event became a major catalyst for much needed reform to labor legislation, as the event was largely the result of poor work conditions, lack of proper fire codes, and c onsiderable negligence on the part of the business owners and managers So while the event had significant impact on legislation and reform nation wide, its larger national importance has largely been forgotten; rather it has been relegated to the collectiv e memory of New York City history. With the appalling conditions of the work place as well as the inhumane mistreatment of workers (many of whom having been newly settled immigrants), the event demonstrates yet another kind of political violence endemic to the 20th-century: the violence caused by the expansion of industrial labor. Both September 11th and the Triangle Shirtwaist Fire, I would argue, were underscored and produced by a particular relation to the circ ulation of American cap ital; both events, having occurred in the business district of New York, serve as traumatic book ends of the twentieth30

PAGE 31

century, each illustrating differently the impact of the United States hegemonic influence over socio-economic relations. Of the various contemporary novels that have dealt with September 11th, several have made use of the memory of the Triangle fire as a way to come to terms with this more recent trauma. In particular, Michael Cunninghams Specimen Days (2005) alludes to the Shirtwaist fire without referring to it directly by name. C unningham nevertheless shows how the traumatic memory of the Shirtwaist Fire haunts the contemporary present of the post 9/11 milieu with its explicit images of falling bodies leaping from a turn-of-the-century burning building. In much the same manner as the narrative conventions used in the critically acclaimed novel The Hours, Specimen Days uses the history of the Shirtwaist fire as a trace of traumatic memory that transcends the temporality of its particular histor ical situation, erupting an d returning to the later thematic elements of the novel. But whereas Cunningham uses the Shirtwaist fire as an important trope, Katherine Webers Triangle (2005) places the event in the forefront of her narrative, which allegorizes its significance in relation to September 11th in productively unfamiliar ways. The novel, which details the traumatic experience of the last living survivor of the fire, Esther Gottlieb, not only traces the contradictions implicit between the processes of memory and the construction of history; it also demands a radi cally different understanding of th e interrelationship between past and present. As Cathy Caruth argues, the linking of traumas, or the possibility of communication or encounter through them, demands a different model or a different way of thinking that may not guarantee communicationbut may also allow for an encounter that retains, or does not fully erase, difference (C aruth 124). I would suggest that Webers conflation of the Shirtwaist fire and September 11th, which is constructed through the horrifying 31

PAGE 32

descriptions of burning, falling bodies into an allegorical mode of representation, approaches upon Caruths ethical considerati on. This ethical consideration, how ever, also harbors a specific political dimension insofar as Webers decision to evoke the seemingly forgotten memory of the Shirtwaist fire traverses more popular histori cal contextualizations beset with militaristic connotations. Indeed, it would a ppear that Shirtwaist fires memory not only disrupts and defamiliarizes these historical configurations: it also underscores the politically violent aspect of industrial capitalism, while making a trenchant critique of reified constructions of history5. To return to theoretical i ssues discussed above, the erupti on of the traumatic historical context of Triangle Shirtwaist fire into the pr esent highlights the ways in which the allegorical mode of Webers novel signals the uncanny return of the past. Like the thematic dimensions of the return of the repressed, Triangles narrative strategies give si gnificant valence to the notion of history as a signifying construction. Simultaneous ly able to refer to both the falling, burning bodies of both September 11th and the Triangle Shirtwaist Fire, the allegorical representation in Triangle achieves an ethical relation perhaps beyond the political context of memory the novel directly engages. To the extent that the signifying process of the allegorical moment never closes into a framework of totalized meani ng, the allegorical representation in Triangle remains ethically situated toward the impasse of the Real. Because while the Bush Administrations politics of memory have reinforced a trenchant polarization of September 11ths historicity, 5 Incidentally, Cunninghams Specimen Days also seems to suggest this critique insofar as the chapter containing the allusion to the Shirtwaist fire focuses on the horror and tr auma of instrustrialized labo r. The story, which conforms to the generic conventions of the gothic ghost story, utilizes the machine as a seemingly malevolent entity, which haunts the young protagonist, Lucas, after the death of his older brother, who dies in the opening of the narrative in a factory accident. If the memory of Shirtwaist fire b ears a trace of memory onto th e larger development of the narrative, it is, much like Webers, through the description of the disintegrated, ashen dead: The dead had entered the atmosphere...With every breath Lucas took the dead insi de him. This was their bitter taste; this was how they layashen and hoton the tongue (Cunningham 99). This description, I would argue, is also strikingly evocative of the days after September 11th, thus tying together the two events through the trope of ash but also the trauma related to capitalist expansion. 32

PAGE 33

Webers narrative upsets this formulation through the triangulation of historical phenomena. In effect, through the collusion of these historical traumatic contexts, a new transformative configuration is developed. This collusion of historical traumas is furt her reinforced through the dyadic aspect of the narratives construction, both them atically and formally. While Triangle concentrates on the historical events surrounding the Triangle Shirtw aist Fire, the trajector y of the narrative is divided into multiple switch-points, as each ch apter vacillates between disparate character perspectives and narrative times. As the narr ative opens with the supposed documented account of Esther Gottliebs testimony recounting her experience of the fire from 1962, the novels temporal location rapidly shifts forward to the weeks immediately following September 11th. Punctuated intermittently by the formal accounts a nd interviews of Esthers traumatic experience over a period of decades, the narratives prim ary focus is on Esthers granddaughter, Rebecca, and her life long partner, George Botkin, an eccentrically famous co mposer of avant-garde classical music. The narrative uti lizes these two characters to reve al the ramifications of Esthers secrets regarding the fire, ones which drastically disrupt the very hist orical closure of the Shirtwaist Fire. Thematically, therefore, the narr ative is also divided: on the one hand, the novel is suggestive of the mystery genre, as the narr ative slowly chronicles Rebeccas and Georges discovery of Esthers memories surrounding the shirtwaist fire. On the other hand, this initial reading breaks down and runs parallel to a sec ondary thematic strand whic h is indicative of the historical novel, as it documen ts the conflicting first-hand a ccounts of Esthers traumatic experience. As the narrative progr esses, the final historical closure of the fire is continually deferred, since Esthers personal memory of the event implicates not only the history of the 142 victims who died, but it also effect s and destabilizes the very cons truction of history itself. By 33

PAGE 34

continually escaping the omnipres ent inscription of historiographer Ruth Zion, the clandestine nature of Esthers memory eludes the crystallizing capture of obj ective history, thus leaving the event open for further translation. These ruptur es and destabilizations, caused by Esthers emerging memories, highlight the wa y in which traces of the pasts return to haunt the present, subtly altering it in the process. Before moving on to a more detailed account of these allegorical moments, it is important to stress the thematic significance of this dyadic formal structure. As the text reiterates Esthers narrative at three different point s of the novelwhich references the thematic focus on the figure of the triangleeach of the accounts offers a new, conflicting piece of Esthers traumatic experience. Alternating between past and present, the novels fr agmented structure mirrors the way the novel makes use of the Shirtwaist fire as an allegorical figure of September 11th, that is, as a moment of the past which blasts open th e continuum of history (Benjamin 261). The reiteration of Esthers memory, then, along with the eruption of the past into the narrative space of the novel, is analogous to the psychoanaly tic notion of belatedness, or the repetition compulsion that results in the aftermath of tr aumatic experience. In effect, the temporal fragmentation of the novel postpones and defers the final narrative closure of meaning; but it also stresses the essentially recu rsive nature of histor ical construction, such that the repetition of Esthers various accounts, over several decades, continually circles around the limit of what resists historical foreclosure. As Lacan s hows, in his reformulation of Freuds essay Remembering, Repeating, and Working-Through, the dis tinction between Wiederholen (repeating) and Erinnerung (remembering) is structured by a certain relation to a limit: the subject in himself, the recalling of his biography, all this goes only to a certain limit, which is known as the real (Lacan 49). The Real as a m issed encounter is, th en, that which always 34

PAGE 35

comes back to the same place (Lacan 49). The lim it Esther keeps returning to, and thus repeats, is found in the reoccurring phrase which begins the novel: This is what happened (Weber 1). As the novel opens with this incipient phr ase, Esthers account introduces a more quotidian description of early 20th-century factory labor, in wh ich she recounts the threading process by which she and her sister manufacture the shirtwaists: I was working at my machine, with only a few minutes left before the end of the day, I remember so clearly I can still see it, that I had only two right sleeves remaining in my pilemy sister, Pauline, she did the left sleeves and I did the right sleeves and between us we could fi nish sometimes as many as twenty-four shirtwaists in an hour, three hundred shir twaists on a good day, if the machines did not break too often, and if nobody put a needle through her finger, which happened all the time (Weber 1). This passage, with its colloquial element emphasi zed through the run-on sentence structure, alludes to two important thematic elements. On the one hand, the verbosity of Esthers accounts, which are always transcribed as a series of fr ee-flowing, run-on sentences, points toward a fact that will be illuminated gradually throughout the novel but is only fully re vealed in the novels conclusion: the fact that Esther is really her sister, Pauline, since Esther has appropriated her dead sisters identity to hide the fact of having been raped and impregnated by her boss, Mr. Jacobs. Esthers account of this threading process, which invariably shifts from the right sleeve or left sleeve depending on the spec ific account, attests not only to the precarious complications of her memory. This slippage of memory also indicates how Es ther herself has taken on a kind of allegorical identity, as she incorporates the memory of both herself and her sister. Thus, the run-on sentence structure performatively conflates the memory of both individuals insofar as Esthers first-hand accounts also inscribe the testimonial memory of Pauline, who eventually merges and is subsumed under the designation of one identity. Again, while this dyadic structure forecasts the later allegorical relationship achieved through the descriptions of the burning, 35

PAGE 36

falling bodies, it also reinforces the larger motif endemic to the novel, which is the accordant interplay structured by combina tions of disparate phenomena. Secondly, this opening account of the seemingly banal facts wh ich detail the two sisters threading process modify and become distorted th roughout the narrative, attesting to how this slight mnemonic distortion is connected to the very impossibility of ev er saying exactly what happened. Or, to put it other way, it reveals a certain impossible possibility of saying the event. In his published lectur e that goes by the same name, Jacques Derrida expounds upon the paradoxical element of alterity or secrecy whic h ineluctably occludes the epistemological and ontological constitution of eventual ity. For Derrida, the eventas that which comes, or as that which comes to happenalways conceals an elem ent of impossible singularity that ultimately resists capture, a singula rity not appropriated by the movement from the events occurrence to its index, or through the saying of the event (D errida 443). While Derrida maintains that, to a degree, one produces the event through the very processes of mediation that register a happening or event, he insists that, in fact, the saying of th e event or the saying of knowledge regarding the event lacks, in a certain manner a priori the events singularity simply because it comes after and it loses the singularity in generality (Derrida 443). Derridas concept of the event helps to bring the repetitive, elusive nature of Esthers experience of the fire come into view. Esthers inability to qualify her experience not only necessitates the repetitio n of a narration, which is always st ructured through the phrase this is what happened, but each telli ng also coordinates the emergence of a new formation of the event, either by losing or gaining specifics pertaining to it. This si ngularity of the event, or the limit to which experience can not penetrate, approaches upon the ethical dimension that the allegorical mode harbors As De rrida argues, there is iterabi lity and return in absolute 36

PAGE 37

uniqueness and utter singularity, so that the arrival of the even t is always a coming back, a spectral revenance (Derrida 452). Although the reiteration of the past, through the allegorical mode structures a non-totalized element which re sists a complete saying of the event, it nevertheless produces new combinati ons and configurations that recal l this spectral return. This spectral revenance not only describes the haunting of Es ther memory that repeats itself throughout the narrative, but it also points to the uncanny spectral relation that is maintained in and through the allegorical moments of the novel. And it is at this point that the allegorical moments of the novel need to be discussed in order to illuminate the ethicopolitical dimensions alluded earl ier. The opening chapter of the novel moves from Esthers description of her ar duous workday to her account of the fire, an account which slowly begins to culminate in uncanny allegorical moments recalling the falling bodies of September 11th. As Esther recalls the very aw ful smell of burning hair and flesh, along with the horrific sounds of women burning a live, the testimony shifts to a concentrated focus on the traumatic experience of w itnessing the women jump from the 9th floor of the building to their deaths (Weber 7). The images of the chaos inside th e burning building, where all the women were pushing at once so that gir ls in front maybe even got squeezed to death, are eerily evocative of the mayhem told by survivors of 9/11. Yet it is precisely Esthers extended descriptions of the falling bodies th at offer the greatest allegorical impact: There were girls with their hair on fi re and their dresses on firescreaming, screaming like you cant image, like anim als, not like people anymoreany they were standing in the windows screaming and then they were jumping and the girls watched the ones who jumped, and then they were in the win dow after them, and they jumped, in rows, it was like they waite d their turns, it was just so terrible (Weber 8). 37

PAGE 38

Above and beyond the uncanniness of this account, it is also significant to highlight the particular verb tense of this description: it changes from past tense to an emphasis on the repetition of screaming and jumpi ng in the present perfect, and then back to the past tense, for the verbs screamed and jumped. The shif ting of tense not only indexes the immediacy of Esthers memory of the event; it also gestures toward a synchronic register of the eventone which is, for the reader, all too fa miliar to the present. Later in the description, th e perspective of the falling bodies changes to Esthers viewpoi nt from the ground, who has inexplicably escaped from the rooftop. This perspective from the ground receives the most detailed elaboration, wherein the description of the bodies hitting the pavement is described by Esther as an inassimilable experience: So I crossed the street, and there were all these people looking up and so I looked up, and what I saw was so terrible, the girls jumping, jumping, jumping up from so high up, they werent like people any longer, it was like watching insects or animalsSome people on the street, they said afterwards, thought they were throwing out the goods to save them, in bundles, when they saw the falling girls, but it wasnt bundles of goods falling and making that terrible soundsome of the girls I knew only a few days but othe rs I knew for a while and it was such a big shock, on would be burned black like a cinder but I would know the boots or dress, and then another would be perfect and still beautiful expect dead from the fall (Weber 10-11). Not only does the thrice repeated word jumping correspond to the thematic of the triangle, but it also functions as the repetition which is inscribed into her very language. Again, the traumatic experience is displaced from that of a seeing to a hearing, creating a gap in experience as a result of a shock that can not be integrated into her symbolic framework. Furthermore, notice how the metaphorical connection to the bag of wet laundr y has shifted from her description to that of others. To fully understand how this descripti on also functions as an allegorical moment signaling the imaginary of September 11th, consider a fictional account of September 11th falling bodies. In Don Delillo Falling Man Delillo offers a similar description of the main characters 38

PAGE 39

experience of watching the falling bodies plumme t from the Twin Towerssimilarly the trauma of 9/11 is also registered in the very failure to integrate the experience into a symbolic framework. Incidentally, it is the description s focus on the shirt, not the body, which provides another uncanny correlation to the Shirtwaist Fire: then he saw a shirt come down out of the sky. He walked and saw it fall, arms waving like nothing in this life [italics mine] (Delilllo 246). As this stands as the last line of Delillos novel, it is important to stress how the narrative leaves the reader with a moment of the Real, attesting to, in much the same way as Webers description, the inassimilable experience of the watching the falling, burning bodies plummet from the sky. Able to simultaneously maintain disparate si gnifications under the proximity of a single trope, the allegorical moments here remain faithfu l [to] history in the ve ry indirectness of this telling (Caruth 27). It is here between the rhetoricity of the bu rning bodies and its correlation to historical traumatic contexts that the ethical dimension is coordi nated, a particular ethical domain structured through its relation to the impasse of the Real. My interpreta tion of Lacans Real, though still understood as that which resists symbo lization, nonetheless will locate its theoretical impact by shifting its implication from an ontolog ical and epistemological domain to that which Lacan situates in the Four Fundamental Concepts of Psychoanalysis in terms of an ethical relation. As Cathy Caruth shows, Lacans reformulati on of Freuds interpretation of the famous dream of the burning child resituat es the effect of trauma expe rience in terms of its ethical relation to memory: Lacans reading shows ustha t the shock of traumatic sight reveals at the heart of human subjectivity not so much an epistemological, but rather what can be defined as an ethical relation to the real (Caruth 92). The dream in question involves one that Freud discusses in his Interpretation of Dreams in which a mourning father who, ha ving just fallen a sleep while 39

PAGE 40

keeping vigil over his dead sons body, dreams that his recently deceased son attempts to wake the man from his dream by asking the chilling question, father, dont you see that I am burning?. The uncanny nature of this dream is compounded by the fact that, just before falling asleep, the father leaves a family friend in charge to watch over the childs body. After the family friend falls asleep along with the father, a nearby candle accidentally falls onto the corpse of the child just as the child in the dream reproaches the Father. It is here that dream and reality coincide. Lacan, however, reversing the logic of Freuds analysis, asks a more radical question: is there not more reality in this message [the child s chilling address] than in the noise which the father also identifies the strange reality of what is happening in the room next door? Is not the missed reality that caused the death of the child expressed in these words? (Lacan 58). Reading the dream as an act of homage to the missed re ality, Lacan argues that the Real traumatic kernel of this dream exists precisely between reality and fiction, between the address and the response, at the suspended moment between the dream and awaking (Lacan 58). The ethical relation to this missed encounter with the real is opened up by th is very gap, this non-place of relation, to that which cannot be symbolized or addressed. While, obviously, this rhetoricity of burning provides a precise figural analogue to the allegorical moments in Triangle, it is moreover important to emphasize how the structural impasse of this inaccessible gap in Lacans read ing of the dream transforms the epistemological and ontological problems of th is circumstance to an ethical relation implicating the gap in experience. For it is precisely this fidelity to the impossibly of response, to an missed encounter which nevertheless structures a te lling that is no longer simply his [the father] own, but tells, as a mode of response, the story of the dead chil d, that approaches upon the topology of allegory 40

PAGE 41

not only from an ethical memory which speaks the other of another trauma through the nontotalizeable sign, but also from the suspended dialectic of the allegor ical construction. The allegorical construction, whose et ymological roots litera lly denote a saying of the other, is an act of referentiality which modifies and transf orms its meaning through the very act of its signification. It is precisely the undecidability of its signification that stru ctures the allegorical way of seeing (Lowenstein 13). Just as it is the very structural impossibility of the gap between waking and dreaming which forecloses and modifies the fathers relation to the child as an ethical relation to memory, so too, as Lowenstein argues, does Benjamins allegorical way of seeing transform the objects meaning through the way in which meaning is not presented as a fixed quantity (Lowenstein 13). Rather, the objects meaning exist[s] in the allegorical moment between being and appearance, between subject and object, between life and death (Lowenstein 13). It is through the very suspension of signification that the dialectical relation of the allegorical moment is achieveor, as I woul d argue, through the very impasse of the Real. For if the allegorical moments in Triangle achieve an ethical relation to history, then it is through this very structural gap that does not foreclose the hist ory of either traumatic context. Rather it intensifies the historical specifi city of each historical contex t through their relation. To put it differently, Triangle allegorical representation is ethical to the extent that, through the very failure of allegorys referentiality, the undecida bility of the allegorical moment nevertheless structures a new way of seeing th e past and the present. Ultimate ly it provides the foundation for a transformative politics of history and the future. This process of historical transformation is further envisioned in Webers project through the efficacious quality of music, one which corres ponds to this allegorical way of seeing. To the extent that the allegorical figures of ash and burning coordinate the conflation of disparate 41

PAGE 42

historical contexts, in Triangle it is the ability of music to forgo its dependence on the symbolic order towards an unrepresentable Real that fully reveals Webers project of translating historical memory. For it is precisely musics ability to combine singular tonal qualities into new combinations of chords and harmonies that mirro rs the allegorical performance located in the text. So although Webers project in the Triangle appears to be an atte mpt to resurrect the memory of the Shirtwaist fire while simultaneously allegorizing its relation to September 11th, the novel does so through a very specific function of representation: mimesis. In effect, the novels focus on the mimetic quality of music sugge sts that the dynamic affectation of mimesis more effectively translates the rupture of trauma than accounts of objective history. While Triangle appears to use the concept of mimesis as a signifying operation through which the past and the present become interrelated, it neverthe less does so, not by conceiving of mimesis as the reproduction of the same, but by emphasizing th e relational interplay between the past and present. Mimesis, in Webers novel, achieves its efficacy through the very synchronicity of disparate phenomena, a synchronici ty that recalls the interrelationships maintained in musical tonalities. It is thus the character of George Botk in and his eccentric use of music that best demonstrates the implications of Webers specifi c notions of mimesis, one which, I would argue, corresponds to the allegorical wa y of seeing. Botkin, who we are told was a duel chemistry and music major in college, utilizes the ingenuity of his musical sensib ilities to map strands of human DNA into award-winning symphonies. These sy mphonies, built off the combinations and structures of genetic materials, produce a visceral response in his listener s, even conjuring the scent and presence of the dead w ith the sound of music. While the fantastic element of this plot point perhaps diminishes the verisimilitude of the narratives content, it does nevertheless 42

PAGE 43

coincide with the continued thematic of mimesis that resonances throughout the novel. Much like the aspect of the Real which de fines the Shirtwaist trauma, Botkins extraordinary music talent and compositions are characterized as something beyond language: Genius flowed from George Botkin, or rather, everything in the world somehow flowed through him and came out transmuted into sounds that were unlike any music, unlike anything anyone had heard befo re. If what Flaubert said is true that language is like a cracked kettle on which we hammer crude rhythms to make bears dance, while we long with our music to move the starsthen George Botkins music was what all of huma nkind longed for with every spoken word (Weber 17). Moreover, Botkins musical genius is further described as having the uncanny ability to see connections and anticipate conseq uences that eluded others; that he is able to see and hear patterns, to perceive sameness and the differenc es that other people di dnt notice, and to transpose those patterns and contrasts into musical forms (Weber 19). Nevertheless, it is this telling quote by Botkin that most evocatively describes the way in which mimesis differs from the allegorical function, one wh ich is situated toward differe nce and alterity rather than sameness: its not just two pure pitches, but th e relationship between them that gives it musical meaning. The leap is where we feel the signi ficance (Weber 216). Now while this passage provides an effective description of the allegorical tendency found in Triangle, this quote also, through the way in which it plays off the word l eapwhich is, of course thematically located all throughout the novelattests to the fact that it is through the figure of falling bodies that most precisely registers the impasse of the Real. In Triangle, the dynamic affect of musicality transcends the realm of the symbolic and draws clos er to the register of the Real. Moreover, it is through this very dimension of musicality that Weber transcends the temporal and traumatic distances between September 11th and the Triangle Shirtwaist fire. 43

PAGE 44

This element of musicality is then trenchan tly contrasted to the discursive operation of historiography. For it becomes a pparent through Webers tenden tious representation of the historian Ruth Zion that Weber pr ivileges the emotive affect of artand, above all, musicas the mode of representa tion that more effectively communicat es the trauma of history. As the character Ruth Zion persists in excavating the t ruth from Esthers memory, the historiographic operation is represented in the novel as diamet rically opposed to the function of art, both ethically and pragmatically. While this ideologica lly loaded binary reveals a salient limitation in Webers vision, it nevertheless points to the main object of Webers project For just as the novel depicts Georges translation of the traumas of September 11th and the Shirtwaist fire into music as both an ethical and effective operation, so too does it become apparent that Webers goal is to achieve a process of translation by bringing these two hi storical events into a correspondence. As Botkin suggests in a fictional magazine inte rview later in the novel, ultimately music plays with the connection between tension and rel ease can render a very specific appealing patternand I think thats what we remember bestour emotional reaction to the interplay (Weber 221). But while this quote registers the overall project of Webe rs novel, I would also argue that it also high lights the way in which the allegorica l interplay between the two traumas are joined. It is this emphasis on musicality as a moment of the Real which structures a response to historical trauma that reveals the very efficacy of Triangles configuration of historical temporalities. This thematic motif of musicality in Triangle thus serves to reinforce the thematic of allegorical relationship between the two traumas, such that something like a harmony of traumatic experience is proposed. The trope of mu sicality shows the way in which two disparate traumas are able to simultaneously speak, without eliding the specificity of each event 44

PAGE 45

actuality. Rather, it is precisely th e very interrelation of the two memories which inaugurates and registers the transformative aspect of its textual performance. Perhaps the most significant section of th e novel is located in its conclusion, where Botkins latest symphony is dedicated to the me mory of the Shirtwaist fire and September 11th. Here Weber attempts to transcribe the formal el ements of musicality into the materiality of the text, to go beyond language in order to utiliz e it as a tool emphasizing the rhythms and movements of the symphonic orchestra. To do so Webers use of rhythmic language becomes coextensive with the repetiti on compulsion, thus giving the la st allegorical moments with September 11th: At once the chorus of 146 voices rages a nd begs and pleads and rages again, and the glorious, terrible, destroying music so ars around them and lifts them up, and the chorus pulls the music down, and down, and down, and the timpani and the untuned bass drums crash together with a boom, boom, boom for each body as it falls, and the bodies fall, down and down and down, and the despairing music darkens the Stern Auditorium (Weber 229). Through this description, one can see Weber attemp ting to push representation to its very limit, not only because of how the quality of the prose mimic the rhythmic nature of music, but also because it attempts to find a limit language that adap ts to the excess that is the limit of the Real. Simultaneously commemorating the memory of the Shirtwaist fire and September 11thboth inside the narrative through Botkins dedication, and outside the narrative since it continues the allegorical projectthe final, most devastating, passage conflates the two horrifying images of the trauma with the musicality of Webers prose, while also referring back to the opening phrase of the narrative: Underneath the noise of it all is the relentless boom, boom, boom, of the bodies hitting the pavement one by one, the terrible stopping short of life is there in the dull weight of each impact [of the timpani drums], it repeats and repeats, the swoop of the falling bodies and then the fi nality of that resonant impact, the 45

PAGE 46

terrible stillness that ends each fall, ag ain, and again, and yet again, the crashing bodies hit the ground, the overload fire es capesthe fire burns in diminishing ripples now, with nothing left to consume, no more lives to be lost, Asch Building to ashes, dust to dust, there is nothing now but the looking back and the remembering, the sifting of ashes that will continue for decades, this is what happened, this is what happened, this is what happened, this is what happened (Weber 230). Here, ash serves as the penultimate allegorica l image of the novel, recalling both historical traumas while attesting to the remainder of the R eal that will continue to burn through the symbolic texture of history. It is here that We bers project can seen as an attempt to correspond to Botkins: both work to bear witness to a notion of posterity that embraces the singularity of each historical trauma, and both works ultimately find allegorical resonance in the accordant interplay between the two traumas. But the figur e of ash, as that which endures and retains the memory of September 11th, also bears witness to the impossibili ty of closurethe sifting of ash that will continue for decades. Ash is used, he re, as an allegorical sign which bears on the ethical relation of the Real, a relation that, a lthough structuring the ve ry impossibility of a totalized closure, nevertheless constitutes the imperative to engender a continued call to historical memory. With the final repetitive flourish of the phr ase this is what happened, the narrative shifts once more from the symphonic performa nce to a first person narrative of Esthers experience. This time, however, the full story of Esthers memory of the fire is told, while Esther, revealing her secret relation to Pa uline, becomes unequivocally her self. This overturning, which is punctuated in th e narrative through th e musical term da capo, ends the repetition, pointing to a possible working through of the trauma. Instead of watching her fianc Sam and Pauline jump from the burning buildin g, Esther takes her place alongside them and 46

PAGE 47

imagines a new history: we are together, I am not alone, they are with me, we will always be together, and then we jump (Weber 242). Indeed, while the novel appears to close in a simplistic and redemptive fashion, I would suggest that, if read closely, it actually forwards a series of unanswered questions rather than definitive answers. Each of these alternatives avoids the capture of a historical closure, gesturing toward an opening of history rather than a closur e. Insofar as the novel si gnals the return and the assumption of Esthers original identity through a final, comprehe nsive recollection of the event, this realization culminates in an other, more fundamental repetition: not simply the repetition of a suicidal tendency recalling the opening of the novel, but also, and more broadly, the closing sequence returns to the scene of history, as it were, in that the novels ending suggests a cyclic series rather than a definitive cl osure. More radically, however, Esthers final recollection also points to the emergence and possibility of a new historyone that is not a simple workingthrough of the repetition compulsion of a traumatic history, but rather one which gestures toward the opening of an alternative history through the very trauma of a fall. As this alternative history is constituted through the bifurcation of Esthers identity, whic h ultimately brings into view the specificity of both Pauline and Esthers memory, it provides a way to read the larger implications of Webers project. This alternative history, then, should not be thought of as a dislocation or absolute beginning, from the prospect of a work ing through. Rather, structured through the very impact of a fall, it demonstrates that it is pr ecisely the figure of the falling body by which the histories of September 11th and the Triangle Shirtwaist Fire collide. It is precisely between these two historical traumatic contexts that an altern ative history can be constructed. In other words, the falling bodies of September 11th bring near the specificity of the falling bodies of the Triangle Shirt waist fire, and vice versa, through the way in which this allegorical figure draws 47

PAGE 48

closer to the zone of proximity that exists between the two histories. Remember, as George Botkin suggests, that the leap is where we feel the significance (Weber 216). Finally, these historical traumatic contexts ma p out a different relation to hist ory: one which remains ethically situated toward the Real history, and from whic h ultimately a transformative response can begin. 48

PAGE 49

CHAPTER 4 ASHES OF AMERICAN FLAGS It is significant to note that Cormac McCa rthys fiction has intent ly focused on the long history of American violence. Si nce the beginning of his literary career, and most notably with his critically acclaimed Blood Meridian (1984), McCarthys fiction has dramatized the bloody advance of American imperialist expansion. In particular, Blood Meridian which fictionalizes the violent conquest of North American fr ontier along the tenuously drawn Mexican border during the post-Civil War era, most effectively demystifies the ideology of Manifest Destiny and the heroic ideal of the West. Mu ch like the 9/11 novels that ha ve offered incisive criticisms engaging the Bush administrations idealizat ion of World War II, McCarthys fictional concentration on the American west has similarly attacked the mythic conceptions of westward expansion. Remarkably, the historically specific aspect of McCarthys novels have too often been neglected by McCarthys critics, replaced instead by a more ahistorical approach that collapses McCarthys emphasis on violence into a homogenous ly framed focus on represented violence. While the ubiquity of violence is most definitely a central aspect of Mc Carthys vision, ignoring the ways in which the depiction and intensity of this violence changes with each historical contextalong the various narra tive modes that represent th is violenceobfuscates the particular political dimensions that underwrite this emphasis on violence. Instead of reading McCarthys use of historical violence as a critique of contempo rary political brutality, this thematic is usually ignored for a more existe ntial interpretation, wh ich views McCarthys violence as a transhistorical ph enomenon that runs throughout the trajectory of his canon. Critic Vince Brewton, however, persuasively argues that McCarthys emphasis on violence is not only historically contingent but also politically fo cused on the historical present. Furthermore, 49

PAGE 50

Brewton maintains that McCarthys early novels Children of God, Suttree and Blood Meridianall concurrently critique th e imperialist violence of 19th Century American while also creating a clear and discernable correlation to the era of Am erican history defined by the military involvement in Vietnam (Brewton 121). Likewise, by focusing on the modification to aesthetic violence in McCarthys fi ction beginning in the heralded Border Trilogy Brewton further contends that this shift can be seen as an allegorical engagement with the United States role in the Gulf War (Brewton 129). So, according to Brewton, while the nature of violence in Blood Meridian allegorizes the heart of darkness that was the American experience in Vietnam, its transformation in the 90s conti nues this politically ch arged gesture by mapping the continuation of this violence into anothe r historical horizon (B rewton 121). What Brewton makes clear is that McCarthys fi ction has used history in much the same way as several of the 9/11 focused fiction: that is, Mc Carthys fiction similarly suggests that only with an engagement with the violence of America past can one significantly confront or understand the present historical situation. But while Brewton focuses on the changes in McCarthys representati ons of violence, it is also significant that McCarthys stylistic ap proach modifies with each different change to aesthetic violence. Indeed, Mc Carthys two post-9/11 novelsNo Country for Old Men and The Roadare, in many ways, drastic stylistic departur es from his earlier work. Whereas his prior work was historically located in the distant pa st, with an often prolix style reminiscent of Faulkners florid prose, hi s recent novels have be en set in the present ( No Country for Old Men) and the near future (The Road ). Similarly, McCarthys prose has b ecome increasingly privative and sparse. The Road s narrative structure, in particular is broken into distinct diminutive fragments, each chronicling a specific moment of narrative time, with little to no dialogue 50

PAGE 51

between its characters. Contrary to his effulgent style in Blood Meridian McCarthys prose, no longer redolent with ornate descriptions of the vi rginal American west, transforms the American landscape into one of ruin and decay, drawing a discernable correlation to Benjamins critical focus on the moribund aspect that defined the German Trauerspiel That McCarthys fiction has taken another drastic stylistic turn with the inauguration of another military, political conflict seems to suggest that this departure responds, in various ways, to the hist orical context defined by September 11th. In The Road the expanse of American west has give way to the ashen landscapes of Americas destruction. Rather than a style reminiscent of Faulkner, The Roads minimalist style has become strikingly similar to the sparse style of Samuel Beckett. Indeed, if Becketts oeuvre can been read as the desperate attempt to respon d to the historical demands of World War II and the Holocaust through an engagement with the representational limits of language, it would appear that McCarthys post-apoc alyptic vision of America, wh ich is described in a broken, exhaustive rhetoric, is the vision of anot her radical break in historySeptember 11th. For both authors, it would appear that it is precisely through the very br eakdown of language that disaster is written. As Blanchot hauntingly maintains, the disaster is what escapes the very possibly of experience: the disaster de-scribes, for it is precisely beyond the pale of writing (Blanchot). Through a literary language that omits more than it inscribes, The Road narrates the collapse of the American project. Withdrawing his language to ward literary silence, McCarthy imagines the impact of September 11th as the culmination and re sult of its violent past. Insofar as The Road engages the sociopolitical ramifications of the post-9/11 milieu, it is precisely the narratives uncanny a llusions to traumatic moments of 20th century history that most effectively signal this confrontation with the present. While th e violent depravity of No 51

PAGE 52

Country for Old Man tackles the seemingly hopelessness of th e present, the ashen landscape of the Road, which simultaneously recalls the ashen afte rmath of 9/11 and Hiroshima, squarely positions itself as the result and continuation of No Countrys ambiguously scripted denouement. In effect, No Country for Old Mens irrational trajectory of interpersonal violence functions as the necessary prologue to the impoverished, inhumane dimension of the blood cults and cannibalism that inhabits The Road The ethereal, ahis torical setting of The Roads narrative which, incidentally, is the only work of McCarthys to depict a fictional world outside of historyis engendered through the a represented pastiche of historical traumatic contexts. Though the novel makes no explicit refe rence to either September 11th or Hiroshima, the abundance of imaginary that corresp onds to the aftermath of both th ese historical events is too prominent to ignore. In effect, in The Road the whole of the American landscape has become a veritable Ground Zero. Therefore, the political and ethical dimens ions of McCarthys narrative are maintained through these allegorical recoll ections of both September 11th and Hiroshima. Much like in Webers Triangle it is the collusion of hi story through the allegorical tropes of ash and burning that coordinate the uncanny eruption of the past. This return of the repr essed of history is analogously directed toward the re al of history, as it s ituates the present as a tenuous site that must negotiate the traumas of two distinct historical moments. It is, however, this very collusion of temporality that modifies the presents relations to the past while, at the same time, maintaining the specificity of each historical phenomenon. Ethically situated toward the Real of history, the figure of ash makes manifest, rather than occludes, Americas own violent past. Instead of valorizing the heroic memory of World War II, The Road upsets the viability of this political narrative by imagining Hiroshima as the real Ground Zero of American history, 52

PAGE 53

reinscribing the memory of this atrocity b ack into the national imaginary. Signaling both Hiroshima and September 11th, ash becomes the only thing that holds sway in McCarthys postapocalyptic world, where all was burnt to as h (McCarthy 15). Thus I will attempt to circumscribe this ethical dimens ion of historical memory through the allegorical figure of ash, which draws analogous figurative features to Benjamins notion of the ruin. The Road follows the travails of an anonymous Man and Child, rummaging alone in the blacken landscape of post-apocalyptic America. Remaining nameless while shuffling through the ash, with each the others world entire, the two characters wander desperately, often without provisions, across the only thing that stil l enduresthe interstate and country roads of scorched America (McCarthy 6). Equally nameless is the event that caused this massive devastation: while the narrative gives flashes of indication th at perhaps the disaster was a result of global nuclear war, much like Becketts derelict imagined worlds in Waiting for Godot and End Game the narrative never reveals the explicit causa l factor which lead to the destructive event. And it is precisely this omission which st rengthens the allegorical aspects of the narrative, insofar as this omission reinforces the ahistorical nature of the post-apoc alyptic: the flashes of memory the man experiences throughout the na rrative highlight the dilemma of a boundless present which is nevertheless haunted by the ghost s of the past. The efficacy of this connection between Beckett and McCarthy is stressed here again, because, beyond the nameless act of destruction, both authors confront th e very limits of historical expe rience, limits enacted from the results of historical trauma. Mc Carthys dystopic world, much like Becketts, is barren, silent, godless, without hope for a future (McCarthy 2). E ach author deals with the dilemma of how, in a world severed absolutely from history, to main tain a fidelity to the past and future: both authors work struggles interminably with the que stion of how to confront a limit that imposes an 53

PAGE 54

obstacle to future horizons. Indeed, just as Beckett emphasizes the atemporal modality of apocalypse, dramatizing the contradictions and limitations of modernity, so too does The Roads narrative discard a coherent trajectory: each of th e narratives segments flashes and cuts at random, disorienting the readers awareness of time or place. For at the end of the world, time is of no concern: he thought the month was October but he wasnt sure. He hadnt kept a calendar in years. They were moving south. Thered be no surviving winter he re (McCarthy 2). Though McCarthys earlier novels followed the impending destruction of the indigenous cultures and lands of the west, here, the devastation has alre ady occurred; and the Mans and Childs course south metaphorically suggests a de scent into the bowels of hell. Whereas, in Becketts work, the recursive meaningless of existence is forever deferred, in The Road meaning fully arrives at its destination through the very collapse of all mean ing: he walked out in the gray light and stood and he saw for a brief moment the absolute tr uth of the world. The cold relentless of the interstate earth (McCarthy 130 In McCarthys post-apocalyptic America, wher e time and history no longer exist, there is no later: this is laterall th ings of grace and beauty such that one holds them to ones heart have a common provenance in paintheir birth in grief and ashes (M cCarthy 56). Here, a salient connection is made to th e notion of the present as boundle ss, over-determined by the very lack of a future horizon, which was ruptured by a co llective traumatic event. It is interesting to note, however, that a very similar sentiment is held by a character from Delillos Falling Man, using almost the same rhetoric to describe th e sense of time and movement of history following the attacks of 9/11: nothing is next. There is no next. This was next. Eight years ago they [terrorists] they planted a bomb in one of the towers. Nobody said whats next. This was next. The time to be afraid is where theres no reason to be afraid. Too late no w (Delillo 10). The 54

PAGE 55

connection here is a significant one. While the figurative use of ash has been a prominent trope in these post-9/11 novels, another po pular narrative strategy has been to highlight the change in temporality opened up by the event: either narrativ es defined by a uncertainty of the future, or narratives, such as the Delillos quote, that s uggest a perpetual deferra l of meaning, where the impact of the aftermath is suspended indefinitely. Likewise, McCart hys dystopic world is defined by hopelessness for the future, from an event that not only liquidates all meaning but also emphasizes the limitations of continuing on into the future. Ne vertheless, the two characters endureattempting to struggle toward the Gulf of Mexico in the hopes of reaching drier, warmer land, which is again suggestive of Becketts Unnameables closing line: I cant go on, Ill go on (Beckett 414). Although this shared narra tive thread attesting to the uncertainty of the future could be seen as validation of the rhet orical position that everything has changed, I would argue that these narratives fully indicate the dangers of adopting this rhetorical position. In terms of McCarthys narrative, this narra tive trend allegorizes the way in which the contemporary present is, simultaneously, over-dete rmined with historical significance while remaining unable to situate the event of September 11th into a coherent context of meaning. Strikingly reminiscent of Lacans readi ng of the dream of the burning child, The Road thus begins with an awakening that initiates the r eader into its post-apocal yptic world, one which omits an encounter with this very di saster. This awakening, then, opens The Road and similarly depicts a Man having awakened into a traumatic realitythe trauma of the worlds collapse. Much like the narrative of Freuds dream, the Ma ns awakening corresponds to the impossibility of responding to a child: when he woke in the woods in dark and the cold of the night hed reach out to touch the child sleeping beside (McC arthy 1). For this impossibility of a response to the child is related to the Mans own missed encounter, to the trauma of his loss which can no 55

PAGE 56

longer be communicated by a direct telling: he could not construc t for the childs pleasure the world hed lost without constructing the loss well that he could not enkindl e in the heart of the child what was in ashes in his own (McCart hy 154). While the Man must let go of the loss of his prior history and memory, he remains unconditionally motivated to protect the Child, an individual who completely missed the apocalyp tic event before his bi rth. It is as though McCarthys decision to begin his narrative after the f act of the event is a metaphorical signal pointing to the aftermath of Americans own di saster on September 11th. The catastrophe, left unnamed and unrepresented in the narrative, remain s a moment of the Real; as Blanchot argues, one cannot encounter or experience the disaster, but is that whic h is most separate, for it isalways already past (Blanchot 1). Awakening from a dream where he had wandered in a cave where the child led him by the hand, the Mans dream corresponds to an a pocalyptic reality, which is described by the narrator as one where the Man and the Child ar e pilgrims in a fable swallowed up and lost among the inward parts of a granitic beast (M cCarthy 1). Thus both dream and reality become reminiscent of a nightmare, in which the gap that structures their differentiation constitutes the trauma of an impossibility to respond to either de mand. It is this very inability to escape the Real of history and the nightmares of the imagin ary realm that inaugurates the limit experience that the Man continually experiences throughout the novel. Beginning from this moment of awakening, then, is the continued problem of an et hical relation to the past, a past that no longer exists, to one that is now rende red insignificant but nevertheless endures in the memory of the Man without a possibility of communication: h e thought that if he li ved long enough the world at last would be lost. Like the dying world the ne wly blind inhabit, all of it slowly fading from memory (McCarthy 18). Because whereas the Man keeps tight to his memories, with an 56

PAGE 57

impossible ethical demand to somehow not betray a memory of the pre-ap ocalyptic, of memories which no longer bear any practical significance, the Boy is completely separate from this prior world, a civilized world he has never known: he [the Man] thought each memory recalled must do some violence to its originswhat you alter in the remembering has yet a reality, known or not (McCarthy 131). Much like the ethical relation to historical me mory Cathy Caruth treats in her reading of Hiroshima Mon Amour a similar narrative which concentrates on two traumatized individuals who inhabit an apocalyptic citythe Man in The Road ultimately faces a deeply ethical dilemma: the unremitting problem of how not to betray the past especially when the past has no possibly of shaping the future (Caruth 27). For as the narrative suggests, the past and the future are irreparably lost, especially their imag inative meaning in dreams: what he could bear in the waking world he could not by night and he saw awake for fear that the dream would return (McCarthy 130). A similar problem occurs in The Road wherein the fidelity to a past that no longer exists highlight s a paradoxical structure of historical memory. Passing through a burned, abandoned city allegorica lly reminiscent of New York after 9/11, where cars in the street caked with ash, everything covered with ash and dust, the Man, attempting to protect his child from the overwhelming horror of a corp se in a doorway dried to leatheran image which suddenly switches to the depraved bodies of Hiroshima offers the Child a warning, stating that the things you put into your head are there forever (McCarthy 12). To which the Child replies: you forget some things, dont you (McCarthy 12). The Father, immediately responding with this chilling paradox of memory, responds thus: yes. You forget what you want to remember and you remember what you want to forget (McCarthy 12). Elucidating the paradoxical slippage between memory and forgetti ng, the Fathers reply attests to the burning 57

PAGE 58

necessity of remembering all that which is ruinous and petri fied by historical eventuality, whereby a fidelity to the past is located within the ve ry interstices of this gapnot only to the tenuous gap between memory and forgetting, but also to the gap of the missed encounter with the Real of their trauma. As the narrative progresses and the struggl es against memory and forgetting become more precarious for the Man, the last refuge of memory becomes allegorical connected to the fragile quality of ash, while the ethical relation to the past brings memory closer to the Real: The world shrinking down about a raw core of parsible entities. The names of things slowly following those things into oblivion. Colors. The names of birds. Things to eat. Finally the names of things one believed to be true. More fragile than he would have thought. How much was gone already? The sacred idiom shorn of its referent and so of its reality. Drawing down like something trying preserve heat. In time to wi nk out forever (McCarthy 88-89). It precisely this imperative to keep the memory of history burning alive as well as the notion of the future emblemized in the figures of the child and ash that emphasize th e political stakes of McCarthys critique. Not nearly as pedantic as the tired old idio m, he that forgets history is doomed to repeat it, this injunction to memory and history in The Road seems to suggest that only with an adamant dedication to and remembran ce of the failures of hist ory, to the memory of its ruin, will any type of rede mptive historical moment occur. Just as the ruin for Benjamin remains the transformative, allegorical figure of history, so too, for McCarthy, does the reminder of ash become the remnant of the Real of hist ory. In short, the figure of ash, as that which remains of the memory of history, serves as th e reminder that the future demands a necessary obligation to the memory of a traumatic past. It is precisely this figur e of ash which blasts opened the continuum of history, shocking the hi storical present with an allegorical image linking Hiroshima and September 11th. By placing disparate historic al traumatic contexts into a 58

PAGE 59

backdrop of American apocalypse, The Road acknowledges the dangers of too quickly domesticating the trauma of 9/11 in to a historical closure. Indeed, The Road asks a more pressing question as well, one which is allegorized again through this in tersection between historical memory and the dystopic world of the novel: wha t do the dying bodies of the pasthave to do with living bodies of the present (Caruth 26)? Only th rough a confrontat ion between the violence of Americas past and the present will any type of polit ically responsible future begin. The imperative of this question is precisely registered by the impossibility of a direct response, but it nevertheless demands a fidelity to a historical memory which can not be fully comprehendedan ethical memory to the Real of history. In returning to the opening sequence of The Road one also finds a significant relation to this moment of awakening and the etymological roots of apocalypse, a relationship which informs an important thematic st rand of the novel. In his book American Apocalypses, Douglas Robinson shows how American apocalyptic na rratives present an ongoing challenge to dominant American ideologies a nd to our contemporary ways of th inking (Robinson xii). It is, however, through the philological inve stigation of the word, apocalyps e, that fully highlights this thematic strand in McCarthys novel: The meaning of the eschaton however, is not in fact the last things but the furthermost boundary, the ultimate edge in time or spaceIf the apocalypse is an unveiling ( apo [from or away], kalupsis [covering] from kalupto [to cover], and kalumma [veil]), then clearly the veil is the eschaton that which stands between the familiar and whatever lies beyond. In this sense the apocalypse becomes largely a matter of seeing ; and what one sees by imagining an apocalypse depends chiefly upon how one c onceives the veil. (Robinson xiii). Directly following the Mans awakening, which opens with the touch from one generation onto anther, the novels next sentence concerns itself with the limits of sight, with a mode of seeing that gradually fades away into the complete darkness of the eschaton : nights dark beyond 59

PAGE 60

darkness and the days more gray each one than what had gone before. Like the onset of some cold glaucoma dimming away the world (McCar thy 1). The tripartite arrangement of sight, limit, and burning follow the chaotic trajectory of each characters journey to the material end of the world and, ultimately, to the absolute end of existence: the fathers inevitable death. The unveiling of the apocalypse ha s stripped away every limit a nd boundary which, embodied in the trope of the ashes of the late world, carrie[s] the bleak and te mporal winds to and fro in the void, where everything is uncoupled from its shoringunsupported in the ashen air (McCarthy 11). And, even though the blackness he woke to on those nights was sightless and impenetrable, (McCarthy 15) where waking in the cold dawn it [dreams] all turned to ash instantly, (McCarthy 21) the burning of memory remains: A forest fire was making its way along the tinderbox ridges above them, flaring and shimmering against the overcast like the northern lights.the color moved something in him long forgotten. Make a list. Recite a litany. Remember. (McCarthy 31). It is here that the tripartite rh etoricity of sight, boundary, and burning coalesces into the allegorical image of ash: ash as the trope which alludes to the remains of memory; as that which clouds the field of vision; as that wh ich has no formal structure but skatters with the vagaries of the wind. If the novels only characters, the Man and the Boy, intrepidly travel down the limitless boundary of the road, it is the additional figure of ash that functions almost as an additional character in the novel, continually following the misfortunate pair. Moreover, it is the figur e of ash that, on the level of the narrative, functions as the metaphorical remnant of memoryas that which continues to burn in memory; as that which points to the allegorical moment s of the novel where historical memory and fictional space collide. If the apocalypse concerns a certain limit of experience, this limit is precisely situated in 60

PAGE 61

the figure of ash which, located between the two historical traumas, allegorically points to the very limits of experience and comprehension. Of the numerous descripti ons which recall these two events, one of the most salient allegorical moments is the evocative descrip tion of the grainy air, whose ashen quality becomes so inescapable and pervasive that the ma n and the child are forced to wear protective masks. Moreover, the narrative tells us, the taste of it never left your mouth. This allegorical moment recalls the enumerable refe rences to ominous fog of ashen air that enveloped the city of New York after 9/11, along with terrible notion that this air actually contai ned the remains of the dead. As was seen in an earlier quote from Cunninghams Specimen Days that I quoted earlier, this focus on the sensual sensat ion of the ash has been an eff ective trope of post 9/11 fiction. Consider Jonathon S. Foers use in Extremely Loud and Incredibly Close in which a young child, Oskar Snell, struggles to cope with the realization that his father, whose body was never found, is part of this ashen air. Oskars diffi cult process of mourning is compounded by the very act of breathing: he [his father] had cells, and no w theyre on the rooftops, and in the river, and in the lungs of millions of people around New Yo rk (Foer 169). Whereas the trope of ash is utilized in Foers novel as a problem connected with the missing body, in The Road the figure of ash becomes another character: ash, much like Be njamins ruin, becomes the figure which is suggestive of all that is mournf ul about history. One could ma ke the argument that, if for Benjamin the ruin and the deaths head are the allegorical objects par excellence for the Baroque period, then the 20th centurys equivalent may well be that of ash, which not only recalls Hiroshima and September 11th but also, and perhaps most saliently, the Holocaust.6 As a 6 Indeed, While Derrida does not theorize the figure of ash in terms of allegory, his emphasis on ash, or the cinder, has been a significant point of reference to the trauma of the 20th century, which is seen most prominently in Cinders but also referenced in The Post Card and Dissemination For Derrida, the cinder, as the ineffable remainder of 61

PAGE 62

mournful trope of history, then, the figure of ash also points to the ashen ground zero of Hiroshima and Nagasaki. Immediately following the passage describing the grainy air, the descriptive focus shifts to the landscape, one which, I would argue, recalls the devastation of nuclear holocaust: on the hillsides old crops dead and flattened. The barren ridgeline tress raw and black in the rain (McCart hy 20). Too numerous to quote, The Roads descriptions of the derelict landscape, rather than a focus on di alogue, overwhelms the narrative space of the novel. In effect, the novels emphasis on the lugubrious landscape, which at times seems to conform to the generic conventions of the travel narrative, reinforces the historical references to the collective trauma of Hiroshima. Though never re vealed, the aftermath of the apocalyptic event becomes so reminiscent of nuclear devastation that one is tempted to privilege this interpretation, regardless of other scenes which subtly imply an act of a malevolent divinity. Perhaps the most apparent allegorical mome nt referring to 9/11 occurs during one of the mans many flashbacks. These flashbacks recall the Mans memories which immediately follow the aftermath of the apocalyptic event; more impor tantly, however, these flashbacks allegorically recall images of September 11th, when escaping survivors fled the burning Twin Towers: People sitting on the sidewalk in the da wn half immolate and smoking in their clothes. Like failed sectarian suicides. Others would come to help them. Within a year there were fires on the ridges an d deranged chanting. The screams of the murdered. By day the dead impaled on spikes along the road. What had they done? He thought that in the history of the world it might even be that there was more punishment than crime but he took small comfort from it (McCarthy 32-33). What is particularly interesti ng about this extended quote is th at, if read a llegorically, the trajectory of the passage chronologically summarizes the aftermath of September 11th: the sectarian violence caused by the war on terror, while the screams of the murdered who are signification, becomes another figure among others in a long chain of privileged signifiers that point to the theorization of difference and the trace. 62

PAGE 63

impaled on stakes could metonymically refer to the massive violence inaugurated by the event. The final line, however, could be read, much lik e the rest of the novel, as an elegy for the unquantifiable violence of th e twentieth century. As the Man and Child stagger th rough the ruins cities and towns of America, the images the novel depicts similarly find allegorical moments signaling the aftermath of both 9/11 and Hiroshima. When the two make it further south ou t of the mountains, the Man sees something he had not seen in some while, common the north, l eading out of the looted and exhausted cities, hopeless messages to loved ones lost and dead (McCarthy 181). Immediately following this passage alluding to the innumera ble messages left on the streets of NYC after 9/11, we get a image of the city which, I would argue, recalls both, through the sa lient figure of ash: the soft black talc blew through the stre ets like squid ink uncoiling along a sea floor and the cold crept down and the dark came earlywith their torches tr od silky holes in the drifted ash that closed behind them silently as eyes (McCarthy 181). In one of the more brutal moments of the novel, the aftermath of Hiroshima can no longer be igno red, as the description remarkably collapses historical trauma and represented image into a devastating allegorical moment: In two days time they came upon a country where firestorms had passed leaving mile on mile of burn. A cake of in the roadway inches deep and hard goingA mile on and they began to come upon the dead. Figures half mired in the blacktop, clutching themselves, m ouths howlingthe black skin stretched upon the bones and their faces split and shrunken on thei r skulls. Like victims of some ghastly envacuuming. Passing them in silence down that silent corridor through the drifting ash where they struggled fore ver in the road does cold coagulate (McCarthy 190-191). Consider the imagery of this description with one of the more vi vidly horrifying sections of John Hersheys journalistic tour de force Hiroshima, which provides Japanese eyewitness reports of the aftermath: from a busy city of two hundred and forty-five thousand to a mere pattern of 63

PAGE 64

residue in the afternoon. The asphalt of the streets was still too so soft and hot from the fires that walking was uncomfortable. They encountered on ly one person, a woman, who said to them as they passed, My husband is in those ashes (Hersey 40). Referring back to the Fathers admonition signaling the paradoxical nature of memory earlier, the Child, upon seeing the gruesome scene, forwards a question directed to the imperative of memory: What you put in your head is there forever? (McCarthy 191). Repl ying in the affirmative to the Childs question, the Man demands that the Child not look at the char red corpses, to which the Child replies: its okay PapaTheyre already here (McCarthy 191). The invocation of memory here, which immediately follows the most allegorical images of Hiroshima, points to the fact that, while the urge to forget the atrocities of history is in one sense necessary to any continuance, to remember that they already there (historys ruin) is to in sist on the fact that theyll still be there (the trace of history) to affect th e course of history, regardless of our decision of sight and understanding. It is significant that McCarthy pl aces all three rhetorical coordinates of the novelash, sight, and the limit of the roadas it insists on the point that the negotiation of traumatic memory demands a seeing (an understanding) that must necessary fall shortan ethics to the Real, or an ethics to that which surpasses knowledge. While ultimately it is the figure of ash that brings together the dialectical moments of history, it is its intimate connect ion to the road that effectively politicizes the memory of September 11th. Because insofar as everything else p al[es] away into the murk, where soft ash blow[s] in loose swirls over the blacktop, the figure of the road, as an allegorical figure of Americans open frontier, harkens back to McCart hys earlier fiction deali ng with the violence of Americas western expansion. Bringing together images of Hiroshima in the context of American while also using common tropes of September 11th, The Road works to place each 64

PAGE 65

65 historical trauma into an unfamiliar context. Much like the trope of ash as figure of residue or remainder, the road in the novel becomes met onymically suggestive of the same qualityit is that which endures beyond the destruction of Am erica as an event or ideology. When the child questions his Father about the significance and origin behind the state roads, then asks him how the destruction of the states came about, the fa ther is unable to give a definitive answer: I dont know exactly. Thats a good question. (McCarthy 43). As Benjamin suggests, the allegoricalis at home in the fall (Benjamin 234). Similarly, here, in The Road McCarthy allegorizes the eventuality of a fallthe fall of America itselfsuggesting the way in which the dying bodi es of the past directly implicate the dying bodies of the present. Awakening once again one morning to an ashen American, the Mans relation to the apocalypse finally begins to become his own unveiling unto knowledge: hed come to see a message in each such late history, a message and a warning, and so this tableau of the slain and the devoured did prove to be (McC arthy 91). Ultimately, it is this dedication to the tableau of the slain and de voured of history that works to upset both the heroic idealization of World War II as well as its po liticized connection to September 11th. For it is precisely this dedication to an ethics of a traumatic history that harbors the promise of a foundation developed from an ethically sutured politic al stance: one deeply concerned with the failures of history, rather than the barbarity of th e victors history, as the nece ssary condition for its redemptive articulation in a future horizon.

PAGE 66

LIST OF REFERENCES Benjamin, Walter. Illuminations: Essays and Reflections Trans. Harry Zohn. New York: Schocken Books, 1968. ---------. The Origins of German Tragic Drama. Trans. John Osbourne. New York: Verso, 1998. Blanchot, Maurice. The Writing of the Disaster. Trans. Ann Smock. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press, 1995. Brewton, Vince. The Changing Landscape of Vi olence in Cormac McCarthys Early Novels and Border Trilogy. The Southern Literary Journal 37.1 (2004): 121-143. Bush, George W. Were Fighti ng to WinAnd Win We Will. Remarks by the President on the USS Enterprise on Pearl Harbor Day December 7, 2001: http://www.whitehouse.gov/news /releases/2001/print/20011207.html Butler, Rex, and Scott Stephens. Slavoj i eks Third Way Introduction. Slavoj iek The Universal Exception Volume I. New York: Continuum, 2005. 1-12. Caruth, Cathy. Unclaimed Experience: Traum a, Narrative, and History Baltimore: John Hopkins Press, 1996. Cunningham, Michael. Spectral Days. New York: Picador Press, 2005. Delillo, Don. The Falling Man New York: Scribner, 2007. Derrida, Jacques. A Certain Impossibl e Possibility of Saying the Event. Critical Inquiry 33.4 (2007): 441-461. Derrida, Jacques, and Giovanna Borradori. A Dial ogue with Jacques Derrida Trans. Pascale-Ann Brault and Michael Nass. Philosophy in a Time of Terror: Di alogues with Jurgen Habermas and Jacques Derrida Ed. Giovanni Borradori. Chicago: Un iversity of Chicago Press, 2003. 85-136. Foer, Jonathon S. Extremely Loud and Incredibly Close New York: Mariner Books, 2005.

PAGE 67

Hansen, Jim. Formalism and its Malcontents: Benj amin and de Man on the Function of Allegory. New Literary History. 35.1 (2005): 663-683. Harootunian, Harry. Rememberi ng the Historical Present. Critical Inquiry 33.2 (2007): 471-494. Hersey, John. Hiroshima. New York: Vintage, 1985. Lacan, Jacques. The Four Fundamental Concepts of Psycho analysis: The Seminar of Jacques Lacan Trans. Alan Sheridan. New York: W.W. Norton, 1998. .Lowenstein, Adam. Shocking Representations: Historical Trauma, National Cinema, and the Modern Horror Film New York: Columbia Press, 2005. McCarthy, Cormac. The Road New York: Vintage, 2006. Newman, Saul. Specters of the Unca nny: The Return of the Repressed. Telos: A Quarterly Journal of Radical Social Theory 124.4 (2002): 115-130. Robinson, Douglas. American Apocalypses:The Image of the E nd of the World in American Literature. Baltimore: John Hopkins, 1985. Rothberg, Michael. Traumatic Realism: The Demands of Holocaust Representation Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 2000. Silverman, Kaja. Male Subjectivity at the Margins New York: Routledge, 1992. Weber, Katherine. Triangle New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux, 2006. Wegner, Phillip. Life Between Two Deaths: US Culture, 1989-2001 Durham: Duke University Press, Forthcoming 2008. --------. October 3, 1951 to September 11, 2001: Periodizing the Cold War in Don Delilllos Underworld Amerikastudien, 49.1(2004): 51-64. Wilkins, Matthew. Toward a Benjaminian Theory of Dialectical Allegory. New Literary History 37.1 (2004): 285-298.

PAGE 68

Zehfuss, Maja. Derridas Memory, War and the Politics of Ethics. Derrida: Negotiating the Legacy Ed. Madeleine Fagan and Ludovic Glorieux. Edinburgh: Edinburgh Press, 2007. 97-112. iek, Slavoj. The Sublime Object of Ideology New York: Verso, 1989.

PAGE 69

BIOGRAPHICAL SKETCH Christopher Cowley received a Bachelor of Arts Degree in English and Psychology from the University of South Alabama in 2005. While th is thesis represents the culmination of his work toward the Master of Arts Degree re ceived in 2008, Christopher plans on focusing his PH.D. studies on American literature and critical theory. His plans for doctoral work are to expand his interests in historical trauma and politi cal violence into a larger historical framework.


xml version 1.0 encoding UTF-8
REPORT xmlns http:www.fcla.edudlsmddaitss xmlns:xsi http:www.w3.org2001XMLSchema-instance xsi:schemaLocation http:www.fcla.edudlsmddaitssdaitssReport.xsd
INGEST IEID E20101203_AAAAEE INGEST_TIME 2010-12-03T23:06:47Z PACKAGE UFE0022171_00001
AGREEMENT_INFO ACCOUNT UF PROJECT UFDC
FILES
FILE SIZE 25271604 DFID F20101203_AABRXK ORIGIN DEPOSITOR PATH cowley_c_Page_44.tif GLOBAL false PRESERVATION BIT MESSAGE_DIGEST ALGORITHM MD5
2bcec597323e45e1ae274e2e014db2d8
SHA-1
e7f50806d67e492006759b275167143b7e1c42ed
25411 F20101203_AABRSM cowley_c_Page_01.jpg
c1a6a06621c07eb606515fa32794d5d1
0c78f3204a73cbbf3cf28351b722c355bbab786c
F20101203_AABRXL cowley_c_Page_25.tif
a6312f0db0382bde3102c3ee7ca249d8
2be1f8cc8906ce739316924bf3db09912cb91578
35778 F20101203_AABRSN cowley_c_Page_44.QC.jpg
d39562eb5ef542519f912dda595e592b
b48d2d2c8882fe8458d31c5a56ce9183dcfe6f86
F20101203_AABRXM cowley_c_Page_06.tif
9f262c7608767029db0101f244835c32
28f2242ed06c1ce3d6c6d7f9bf0b2b0aea9357e9
123304 F20101203_AABRSO cowley_c_Page_18.jpg
28f83bfd2c5222fcdacf6bf547dab25b
ccf3f67b9615918e7c73a8badcfcdb81ece2848f
2329 F20101203_AABRXN cowley_c_Page_69thm.jpg
05c5a6f95859db1f79d66a9cd5f1e315
10a86bd1014505fcad9b7ea07d4203e4aaf98594
35943 F20101203_AABRSP cowley_c_Page_11.QC.jpg
b58c27080345a6adddeed31f5f944481
4a52f43e5a01b349c45b3f6cdb16b54158abce7d
109467 F20101203_AABRXO cowley_c_Page_40.jpg
d86a5a2afaedf23afeb1a6a2b40d940a
2c47d8d763c87a875e2fe37510c2eeb396fbdfc6
F20101203_AABRSQ cowley_c_Page_04.tif
6a3424b2cac767c4029110d28426ec5f
4959a5a4b193752279c6810058ff9ac2c8331add
36241 F20101203_AABRSR cowley_c_Page_14.QC.jpg
3b9d786a7eb34a51486e8373de40534c
84c2c6d3d6b288cc1ab4fd78993bf6312b9c652d
1051936 F20101203_AABRXP cowley_c_Page_25.jp2
11332d48280aa3febb0f559af97d0c87
00e7abd53bacb995b8853a126e1c5efd86c14233
123377 F20101203_AABRSS cowley_c_Page_38.jpg
ac99ef5a02a80f8b3a619a3bf43f50b9
e932cdf57d9353d75824fb50ab5ecdca43bf7587
8305 F20101203_AABRXQ cowley_c_Page_66thm.jpg
9fcfbdf833ee485b5b61c204638c21d5
06b954ad0f7c7dc623e1c7391d9596afd5a98b83
F20101203_AABRST cowley_c_Page_35.tif
db1c3697a04738c0810f8f43dec1e034
e9417bf240fbbe40f25793dfc8ee1e6790d97db2
7937 F20101203_AABRXR cowley_c_Page_67thm.jpg
90fed8e6ba0a2c1f6dfe51646d9ef468
42cd313c9abb89d666622ac33f8873d14aee6e0e
1051971 F20101203_AABRSU cowley_c_Page_09.jp2
2251888769a2f69d3c005d9c76c7ad2c
6c4439617342f376e6c92f962e6ca20942e583fd
35138 F20101203_AABRXS cowley_c_Page_22.QC.jpg
1c7665cc4aaa8d34d0dd72ed1abee778
a6dcb4da731380df2d3984beb3327fb05842ee39
171491 F20101203_AABRSV cowley_c_Page_68.jp2
caf3ece6e35a1fdea8dc676bf5f62923
007117c606dbfe49213ed70f92e72f9f5683c6d8
1051950 F20101203_AABRXT cowley_c_Page_41.jp2
846d268a58b20333001e4d57297c0a6e
2cffd0ff5ca45abde7bf638539f1f8fd43e0ae18
30707 F20101203_AABRSW cowley_c_Page_69.jpg
f872de4925b567f3fd3ace78614f5b32
4311f7a759032cf7571aea2ecb3c49030275af06
115578 F20101203_AABRXU cowley_c_Page_55.jpg
3f995c242fdcb80b4d4eeadf7e67fb1a
679947f24525e7de94c54adf28fcf2e32f15fcd0
23925 F20101203_AABRSX cowley_c_Page_08.QC.jpg
278765b0e6c0a22bb1c1295100ab53a0
1c4b8d24532b73b5137da1feae812fe170386eb8
37423 F20101203_AABRXV cowley_c_Page_38.QC.jpg
5710537c13cbd03a82505caf3ef4a4d8
2c0a8e22602fa8e6a44a4260d9f3a4a4e958bf4f
39004 F20101203_AABRSY cowley_c_Page_24.QC.jpg
f1ecd4cc9c6a1afe63882c6cf5985126
42944c63353ecd60ceec5499c52a3dd40211b8a0
35552 F20101203_AABRXW cowley_c_Page_30.QC.jpg
b8f24cc79e2b845df2f872ac37b62c8f
2f6e988a81a5914b7b2fcca9ddbadc689449dadc
36644 F20101203_AABRSZ cowley_c_Page_19.QC.jpg
759152d565748b51003503b65c7edba6
3ac7cdfc8a5d65e4e6d6e02adb82c244d1bccb57
44311 F20101203_AABRXX cowley_c_Page_06.jpg
4e734ffcd3f41d993b450f7d04e0821f
ca9f305a5191a77aa24d8e22412867fc332d7702
F20101203_AABRXY cowley_c_Page_59.tif
0714cc083bf0786c1f54ab535668a59f
2f16f1c3d491b21a3049c7c9ad52e9e087852183
1051908 F20101203_AABRVA cowley_c_Page_26.jp2
5d6f62d96d2f13e7be3cf2cd8966121f
c675079afc6d408644815f2847f10b452dea05f2
36407 F20101203_AABRXZ cowley_c_Page_52.QC.jpg
c8114512e0ecf90ff4790b6ca3cdcaee
dad566a9d97de4bbc1fd427e095945dbb194d3fa
F20101203_AABRVB cowley_c_Page_47.tif
7e855063413084b9f45af78a54ebe23b
a7efaf16d54263321982356ded072ed5b092924b
F20101203_AABRVC cowley_c_Page_54.tif
056d2747d081a4f01ac6327d5b0b1f38
a1b74dcffc3f2c6438515f4b8a7455d950ab9f51
9067 F20101203_AABSCA cowley_c_Page_20thm.jpg
b27383cb9efa743b7b2df05fc8c2841c
f07f879ea12b47d99cabc7e38bf38f09cd0e0d6d
3374 F20101203_AABRVD cowley_c_Page_06thm.jpg
47561ba12ccaa7560d956f45c1bc16dd
4d275f07e7100c3d12b902e25b186676c04f4b49
37191 F20101203_AABSCB cowley_c_Page_61.QC.jpg
c106326b224b6be9f21746126677d758
2fdb59a7daf7a7086b7c63985fa640c901d59f0d
105806 F20101203_AABRVE cowley_c_Page_09.jpg
798374bb33115c0b96ed55bdbb980afc
8536665cc62c7982ad6f7f1df94730fb103b2a7f
9066 F20101203_AABSCC cowley_c_Page_32thm.jpg
bfb87b7d8785b27b056cf79e81a6bb82
b82a83553a0325ccc99344e05946d0999317dcf0
F20101203_AABRVF cowley_c_Page_52.tif
549ea8aef4cb8f33d23ebb7cec81dbae
0b38c04339289ed57d9f5bcfaa48454b8a04f2a9
7296 F20101203_AABSCD cowley_c_Page_29thm.jpg
c53cb0c29fe30503371c6d0c3f1be685
6b8b05942359d9a64f37891e34e84d607aa79209
36780 F20101203_AABRVG cowley_c_Page_13.QC.jpg
955a4e1b4e420287c3979365ccc21ef2
484d89be9aa054650c15b38bbee3bdd01e81fc08
9112 F20101203_AABSCE cowley_c_Page_34thm.jpg
758290d6196d78e568b4a435df34eaba
edafe505a86643655016f56c3af111ccaa56bd60
2682 F20101203_AABRVH cowley_c_Page_05thm.jpg
68a541c4e887f168964f4d929035dfe6
fe908fa678781a8c0a5b6690fc8b5ef5b0b58fb6
39064 F20101203_AABSCF cowley_c_Page_18.QC.jpg
c72ab1911a2e01335d5059684bd99d00
f781014218d31e0d79b674e9ff086d4b6929f1cb
F20101203_AABRVI cowley_c_Page_21.tif
d953e788ac4373344d617a64b403ac1b
d079c03045100d0e8710b64db9b6c8e96727300b
8201 F20101203_AABSCG cowley_c_Page_01.QC.jpg
02a665ed33a885e2060689fd7e5397cc
9439dbb564b32722e48c3761afd1d47efbe4431f
33481 F20101203_AABRVJ cowley_c_Page_16.QC.jpg
a9caf1acb613d6433e208dc64c628e23
bd2be0aaaaf31ebc4ca958443dbdcb9cc0ec0c8f
9284 F20101203_AABSCH cowley_c_Page_64thm.jpg
a16eb0c0d92c2664eee952697a66b8f4
5a999b0a6a5afde49ed191223c76d3ee8fd134bd
7069 F20101203_AABRVK cowley_c_Page_07thm.jpg
5e4d49512c60982b1efe48345394ca93
1dfaf29b179a06fada7faf04ba2b7424d6208549
35284 F20101203_AABSCI cowley_c_Page_04.QC.jpg
97dd8a095ab71622db4a0a27fe04c350
a9c8e4c474e96460538d1c0581c503a92cb56645
1051981 F20101203_AABRVL cowley_c_Page_51.jp2
338f5069f63ebf703eb399e04f98dbbb
6457f7bdad7d5b684ff1548248cb821bc9793295
37132 F20101203_AABSCJ cowley_c_Page_53.QC.jpg
89045c8688647a82177b00040a83d702
eecf37f5b0142e653ff1146e2fadfbc6e7c39f7b
1051948 F20101203_AABRVM cowley_c_Page_43.jp2
afb0b8ea83ba1ab24800acbe8ea40302
d989cf5f7541c609746079dc71694b21d8a17356
29162 F20101203_AABSCK cowley_c_Page_67.QC.jpg
baef4003e6916d88be730f21a6c1f0d8
ff72b2f4e0dc03dcaff2d88615164ebd168cfbbf
34799 F20101203_AABSCL cowley_c_Page_12.QC.jpg
00ef2f7de8e640c73a8badff20c829cd
de38224a5a193cb174add6b48fe367b9d9bfd2c8
108483 F20101203_AABRVN cowley_c_Page_22.jpg
cf8e66646fa3a4ab79e74821b35675b6
38e004b63f4e0babd10870a5e3058f5e2f1d6168
9260 F20101203_AABSCM cowley_c_Page_55thm.jpg
d15c8f65cfdf0da09b84b53668b9621e
5c042b8b163cdcfebc75b98258684625b5f8fd48
33272 F20101203_AABRVO cowley_c_Page_46.QC.jpg
85ac6c93564b488ee16b106657e59bb1
7aab6e3d4f70b24036111958cc3bd58b0bdfc12a
36043 F20101203_AABSCN cowley_c_Page_58.QC.jpg
d7539eb78a2dc89bd966e5458622ca06
50a9db40b7d6e8565edf49fa9e7f4c7d9b531860
109201 F20101203_AABRVP cowley_c_Page_46.jpg
4347cc31fc5dd9ed8f217c9abd345645
3c189d5c244d759df60c33f1cc053890dadf15bc
37068 F20101203_AABSCO cowley_c_Page_35.QC.jpg
a264d1fb759c6a10de1cd6c53c51a22d
9513e5629e824129dbcc502ff22e1b8400f1e4af
8926 F20101203_AABRVQ cowley_c_Page_50thm.jpg
a08ab6b8192787d3e884a2e1448473a2
2fb6007c7115f91736a627ed62d354b91a140101
9298 F20101203_AABSCP cowley_c_Page_24thm.jpg
0c49bdfedf5849aed9c2ec028cc4ce8b
59be8e159bc3fa4e70943c7dde8e743b843a44c7
1051976 F20101203_AABRVR cowley_c_Page_61.jp2
28250e94bfd1d34f0caf9181984c48bd
fef32df6414aae9fc7f30ae25e2ee2a7ef1cc26c
F20101203_AABRQU cowley_c_Page_10.tif
21f7ec9826faee029b81f02502817625
a8c6d1092d97f44124480df068c3b28ccb433ddc
8842 F20101203_AABSCQ cowley_c_Page_17thm.jpg
2f3162e9e9be7bca78fe0ba0eca559a8
f11dbd8bccb46412e022963bdcacc3f67e6f3621
1051941 F20101203_AABRVS cowley_c_Page_47.jp2
5a5c1b46061b09aceebde31e31e3ea3e
fdab9aae0ea5634ef8d7acb3ddf2e04f3f40c6b4
F20101203_AABRQV cowley_c_Page_65.tif
72c5e84dab641677745150500df7f2af
6e758487a90883fd404659072c134ab0edbeb855
36377 F20101203_AABSCR cowley_c_Page_50.QC.jpg
f4c7e01804d9f71ee0cc55b46e4d3d5b
2d7ddb6776c58eb60acc3b49bd54ebdc26b08a7f
1051953 F20101203_AABRVT cowley_c_Page_34.jp2
81f0f4646f8bb0bbdab4c6a811a04f35
ef1fd39b589077a43012e7ecf4c2816699812098
8801 F20101203_AABRQW cowley_c_Page_44thm.jpg
3c14deb7d5d3ebb1e8c05ba37977422d
06ea52b470ac361e3dcaa81e1ac651be3274a0a9
35781 F20101203_AABSCS cowley_c_Page_60.QC.jpg
53ef8be91dd3a84ab1e1da170a7fa427
0cab97539cfbc4ee82cfe3f576168c4559c1a565
1051969 F20101203_AABRVU cowley_c_Page_20.jp2
3b74c16a118d07ea52f2558125bbc617
a9c803eecdc49be61f07018c3bf5067d1c92e939
F20101203_AABRQX cowley_c_Page_20.tif
0a8acc1d770d07e29a0c4a6e34faa93a
f966d0e42bbb49f8bddbd814f395aea49fdc5076
523 F20101203_AABSCT cowley_c_Page_02thm.jpg
486588659a212cee46e2ba3b9665a61a
3ae45e2f6ce83bea24f95bc3cc78ea37f90c9bc4
9322 F20101203_AABRVV cowley_c_Page_53thm.jpg
37890bf10cede0d7e5f2d05c513b66ab
a783ff206d79c0db5612f5d82d8e9c60ebef018f
111289 F20101203_AABRQY cowley_c_Page_11.jpg
933dc72963bf07aa8b7650006755c08a
497b6916c95042f436cd11ce9b182165eb11cded
76995 F20101203_AABSCU UFE0022171_00001.xml FULL
87e718006097839bf6bfa025356d71d4
0ab228b775cce1b7ab77bac321d279b4dfac9c1f
9105 F20101203_AABRVW cowley_c_Page_41thm.jpg
4cb74c45d4d7b8a8d753ad9b3db9d93d
b78ed42bf0cba647589572df05cfa6f7096bb36c
F20101203_AABRQZ cowley_c_Page_69.tif
89d9e4066e837f35876aa5305e9d3ef5
912ebc4d317d6d822e22148e7c174a80dbdb27eb
8626 F20101203_AABSCV cowley_c_Page_04thm.jpg
fbf1741d94587710837a41223ffe2b2f
50361c0504079a5fa84a61d3bd939450cf6ab0ef
F20101203_AABRVX cowley_c_Page_16.tif
ee50c04b66a864ed4b04f6f89cd0f166
6835d9ca1e7a9a427f3f5a339fd771995255ba0a
12366 F20101203_AABSCW cowley_c_Page_06.QC.jpg
8d54863a164010c7429b1bd0c9a190ae
0e5f5475f94a72625cc92d0d8568a05412c627e9
9283 F20101203_AABRTA cowley_c_Page_23thm.jpg
23e61e3be34df54162d7d1284204a181
ce0075bcd08bab4ea8f456956a597a55f8ac9c75
F20101203_AABRVY cowley_c_Page_17.tif
c89624e83b10f55e79ad2efd43f795a4
54efb9d279fa19429af28d1ee1bf655aa41f2226
5957 F20101203_AABSCX cowley_c_Page_08thm.jpg
de57d3ddafca068a19ec2b637b48cf3c
b87df323b9d088f97b54b948026840809d0ec5ed
F20101203_AABRTB cowley_c_Page_38.tif
8cbef4e0e84013543ff7951ca46fc33e
bf1ce37d8840cfa2ca5b719c8b6fcaa9a030c920
F20101203_AABRVZ cowley_c_Page_13.tif
3ecd35a2d53a202f7f418e83b2405695
ce482e74e453cdb8252efd179f56df67d5103f19
36591 F20101203_AABSCY cowley_c_Page_10.QC.jpg
a812cbf86e677fe52f207df8814a282b
a2daf7c038f4f13805567aa473afb964251cad38
8707 F20101203_AABRTC cowley_c_Page_12thm.jpg
3845c59b648ddbda26d27821f713bab9
6dfe0862a78e7f3a61914474d1b57420398a8527
8892 F20101203_AABRTD cowley_c_Page_22thm.jpg
8be5af0e5ae13bc5f10e3bc0d15fa5b2
55ca3168237a5edda25a71d18a37fdda9c2cfb52
9258 F20101203_AABRYA cowley_c_Page_39thm.jpg
32ff133a203ef3a54025aff1a42573a9
a3d112d9bc3b789fdb6a99f7b2fd5e21c0093ed1
1051905 F20101203_AABSAA cowley_c_Page_10.jp2
c505006312c13c494a09fce287f99205
e734e5d00cbb25a84a6101651deb256f997d436f
9221 F20101203_AABSCZ cowley_c_Page_10thm.jpg
56f66b7aa45a078d71306a0b5e7bafa7
a064b6dbe34ad7c5e8aa7a386a9422c48de22089
F20101203_AABRTE cowley_c_Page_57.tif
b46bd3a60315e535e7730a75c34aa924
9570a2ccce3addd40cf004250f6bc42171d18a3a
1733 F20101203_AABRYB cowley_c_Page_68thm.jpg
0b135d03b7ad2d904ec0a1941c8d54d5
8923e7dc4ab83bd9b687778a52ef5e77d7b6cb41
1051952 F20101203_AABSAB cowley_c_Page_11.jp2
db894d3cf6623a1f9410805adb15bd14
2ac1771f9d72d1188e6361d1a8daad1dabe7eecb
114083 F20101203_AABRTF cowley_c_Page_41.jpg
bdbd7b206275a22b6f09247d0bf385ab
7c94dc55d5c84586acefba87f9a697b6d4f3c43d
8335 F20101203_AABRYC cowley_c_Page_09thm.jpg
9d49c2283d5a109be624e0ca1e5b1a99
6030487818c8cc34b4b2b67864daf2dff1e1d8f5
F20101203_AABSAC cowley_c_Page_13.jp2
46e2ad3258d420c9017bd2aaf530c4d0
68fd5232b031dd9e56e08564e72b5eeb24318b95
F20101203_AABRTG cowley_c_Page_14.tif
5d9cf0419d8e8b43a902243062f4d8b6
5035786699f479cbae631db3b4eee117fa7cd259
F20101203_AABRYD cowley_c_Page_40.jp2
8ec5f7c7d74f0eebabb1c701c87499d9
f7914ada54660cf8b715db1c86743a3ae442cfcf
1051975 F20101203_AABSAD cowley_c_Page_16.jp2
5d52473a349919361f2e4250238cf038
212aa854e95bc477eacf1d762f49bcd1fb432619
9161 F20101203_AABRTH cowley_c_Page_11thm.jpg
19caef0b9d67ea819263b3eb1447406d
8ac2bdb2d40fd78b059bb720717df3dd39609e8b
F20101203_AABRYE cowley_c_Page_53.tif
ca571575b17370d62d9c38610303da8e
f76a7e4d17feee856003a4734640a8379831f5d6
1051964 F20101203_AABSAE cowley_c_Page_18.jp2
84a93326760931864c095cf7b3369f97
d1b763233c98e628a409e7e58749c4bdb30b7db9
72504 F20101203_AABRTI cowley_c_Page_08.jpg
6bc8b78c47ca6a4ae5aa8243c2f0e693
ad2782b3d9fe7046e2c6709509ab313cc4ee6318
118063 F20101203_AABRYF cowley_c_Page_59.jpg
2152fc773649e3b4ddefed00edd32ed0
a26d78270a616545bd49bc1eae01f0628ebbfe54
1051984 F20101203_AABSAF cowley_c_Page_19.jp2
d8ecbace3f3cc53089f78a309da0ff0b
daf29c534fc9e264566b3830d2de19aad4bce18d
26779 F20101203_AABRTJ cowley_c_Page_07.QC.jpg
7375604b6aef95edf3e7eb382fddded1
51329b1be8567c514025ea9ce373e5ade39e861c
315740 F20101203_AABRYG cowley_c_Page_05.jp2
ea1d193e1c7a7f9e937ae581023aace0
cc548bc7a83109a279523d60a0c04bc361094938
F20101203_AABSAG cowley_c_Page_22.jp2
803d5f2d0ed0d0aee86e95bbd32a68ab
a3805f64a8ebde9a38127b694f2357ba2f2761eb
8835 F20101203_AABRTK cowley_c_Page_60thm.jpg
089e1cfc1de20283f80c8291b53fd8cd
e8b3f8569d858e59c38c56b46135087b1cfd46ee
113746 F20101203_AABRYH cowley_c_Page_19.jpg
be796d2ac92bf89b174c65c88c9d92e2
3fe390cbb4eeb9057c15f4d07cf483fcc8900b9b
1051916 F20101203_AABSAH cowley_c_Page_28.jp2
b7a1d9861702e4b0222de21b8bda182c
6ad8c9bad3b52d93b19c27d20776112bc5a5dbea
90300 F20101203_AABRYI cowley_c_Page_65.jpg
ec823e9edc12164e064da39a3f7e3c4e
9f5d013b2053d0301f2621c4d7e32dbbfe256ff6
1008231 F20101203_AABSAI cowley_c_Page_29.jp2
d041dc11910be1df2d1cd66018644073
f48cfdb4d3da57bdb2a50994e707236e67214092
36930 F20101203_AABRTL cowley_c_Page_64.QC.jpg
1bad05c788baf5ddba5dc408ff316481
3471ad52ac29718cde1d74f406d68efa8655cc6e
8758 F20101203_AABRYJ cowley_c_Page_31thm.jpg
fbcc8c3bb457c34219acde0a60d15a7b
bddf0936c57806d9d30afbbc0dff814deb930f40
1051930 F20101203_AABSAJ cowley_c_Page_30.jp2
0902bd25b77ea04997d5e3ab1f6953c1
b74f5ba11f0278773203558766714b6e6149effc
111618 F20101203_AABRYK cowley_c_Page_39.jpg
65219394b1f88b98ef9f94a10f6f1583
18ad5eb7a5e1ce31e2128635a02067f01b1be0d4
1051939 F20101203_AABSAK cowley_c_Page_31.jp2
d2ea04b355740ebe79622d6a94c8909d
55601fdcec82647fed9fb45eed31cac3e6a4ac35
9002 F20101203_AABRTM cowley_c_Page_40thm.jpg
4854dfcc98ba9ea7b669213df8a2d7b5
40fa3854cf5b1ee8d0e5afc6f3748ede46837680
2108 F20101203_AABRYL cowley_c_Page_01thm.jpg
2bd75d8055d4ee6a7dc582b0ff852936
89fd3eff01d60402cfb0ae73bf6f15443bd5b956
F20101203_AABSAL cowley_c_Page_32.jp2
1d54e617483bfc2ad1f11ea0a6b96c2f
7c6af8eb2c1778ab596ebc562718b7f9a88c425d
8941 F20101203_AABRTN cowley_c_Page_25thm.jpg
8d0a8ac22e019cde906b91afe5aad8c7
e02b762c655dc172deb176f3699f073fa25a74ae
53354 F20101203_AABRYM UFE0022171_00001.mets
56894f791d1b1ab25693ee8a5921db8f
46f280701e2c9a36f367730bff6b87ab316db0ab
1051954 F20101203_AABSAM cowley_c_Page_33.jp2
d90a7475e6daa1f72fbbd4019f7b396e
44b7ff0bfe1f9cc8e0293a36c229c6a79789bf03
28386 F20101203_AABRTO cowley_c_Page_02.jp2
0a64ac67b017c969162ca2622bc984d3
0192671299a0f76546a388e7bc83541f376737d8
F20101203_AABSAN cowley_c_Page_39.jp2
a31aeedc4fa27037b05db737d00bcd56
cdc643225bdcc88bbfaff3da5c1856980b8e178f
36490 F20101203_AABRTP cowley_c_Page_20.QC.jpg
3807a46949455273482a4387d8726c05
5ae6216ba6c33efb23dc345be2ed5446dd906cf8
1051955 F20101203_AABSAO cowley_c_Page_42.jp2
7511e0868ba834bf0fbf81c64f5061ff
7d72ec19a41912244377b9ce16f6201d729c2d20
35941 F20101203_AABRTQ cowley_c_Page_34.QC.jpg
4511f2e89606e1f00ec861964d7ea724
a9ef273d9efcdbcca71c56b014c19c6684023f24
7636 F20101203_AABRYP cowley_c_Page_03.jpg
abbbf28de2e39204695839f9e4ca7856
fe9ba8b72a5d45f86a189bdf65aa8745da6eb13b
1051973 F20101203_AABSAP cowley_c_Page_44.jp2
cb5318ca161f0c7cbd214533c47029fe
7c3fa4801674d4482b0490248be7ec81e301b84c
1051974 F20101203_AABRTR cowley_c_Page_56.jp2
cd66dc2f740e5d12fc94f2422235eec6
2271568f03f701e54772388d19f4ddf6b592bde5
235193 F20101203_AABSAQ cowley_c_Page_48.jp2
c5e2fc56c8ba8ead82b70e939defa37d
f3637867e8c2140c86831be57fa3d9640846b33d
36834 F20101203_AABRTS cowley_c_Page_39.QC.jpg
b44e029f6a8e43aee1968bf3c00df02d
4b2e18d639b5cc63e871051bfb3a4caeaa541732
110327 F20101203_AABRYQ cowley_c_Page_04.jpg
b6e82350d8929de220a9994e4e4713d8
212d524d15b45c0fa14a24fa7d44bb798359c055
1051935 F20101203_AABSAR cowley_c_Page_49.jp2
251ae512032eaa0fa733dd4ce307c74a
9d5afe2db8a6b7dd78c011b67ffeff51f0bbb918
247130 F20101203_AABRTT cowley_c_Page_01.jp2
28c2a6c642ba4eeed0d73e3dc22c0a82
81f109f305be35baaeb277bc1a6d8b0f91cd38c8
86249 F20101203_AABRYR cowley_c_Page_07.jpg
bc6dc2be2ff27156c065516df73afcb8
82ca3bcc17d4ce698c61b556e531268f6701fa74
1051961 F20101203_AABSAS cowley_c_Page_50.jp2
0797ecf09b3d0aededa292a5eb7b1854
d5b365523c4016ab42d82404b5a4a37d300c87d1
10683 F20101203_AABRTU cowley_c_Page_05.QC.jpg
ce58ce7f99ebff645d8e955872b38549
ff20d76a48d7c02c93091032268f577d1dd44e8e
112301 F20101203_AABRYS cowley_c_Page_10.jpg
42846957853297c72dd843e0584a6e8f
597b6951ef4770876f386ea224677e2729d05bd0
1051979 F20101203_AABSAT cowley_c_Page_54.jp2
3831f9e40b4dc010c33cf2996b19fdae
93d09f151dae36b522e84191ff1612c4c205f189
F20101203_AABRTV cowley_c_Page_36.tif
db679ad4415f8aaeaa396bbe78b0bf91
19def0d1612455765f18230257c30dc67b165a39
108254 F20101203_AABRYT cowley_c_Page_12.jpg
b3d1ba4e4b955b8c94ce09eff479c685
4aec57389693b80e0f20a7c3fb718192179892d4
1051927 F20101203_AABSAU cowley_c_Page_55.jp2
41d12ad5a5b9a87243891d960f6bb17d
0274c77c9ee7a9f75c4a3c2322e9786c07e5d7de
F20101203_AABRTW cowley_c_Page_49.tif
8ba3e976d71f37a20825eef4b3427b68
e7b05d2a3e7448b865c362b31cdadf0a323067c3
111888 F20101203_AABRYU cowley_c_Page_13.jpg
da821ca6d2d4fe8fb0dd4bd65e949012
4f0cdcb967975a5c8d10f29b33be1dbc726be8fd
1051947 F20101203_AABSAV cowley_c_Page_58.jp2
1d6c6fc5c804bbe1e4fb59bb54372d3b
6a4fac09c36ead131b12df7ef7d04f1e09247de4
94741 F20101203_AABRTX cowley_c_Page_66.jpg
b9dfd975f6b677ebbf1d6926fb109674
c7fed0c0d10e664707dcb89a6b9ebd6eb77c7a03
114121 F20101203_AABRYV cowley_c_Page_17.jpg
c522e83a3054d83f6c584d70588115d9
c70f804f0336a6072988c5a300bf4f9501438e07
1051983 F20101203_AABSAW cowley_c_Page_60.jp2
bd1b06f3d4e905b1a3175e968962f805
ce4addc749b6084dad31756f621fc5738775d837
30158 F20101203_AABRRA cowley_c_Page_29.QC.jpg
268f3f304b976aa7bbf416e9df3d55b7
3bfe13dd05a0ff81913287820af0f3cac4521f93
1051911 F20101203_AABRTY cowley_c_Page_14.jp2
0e5f5574787ad23944cd8b44de76094a
ef2e7627d6593e8132d74cb7d9c26c391867f59d
113269 F20101203_AABRYW cowley_c_Page_20.jpg
fce125a16388de7ddc221cd8ca939aa9
a20fdb7ba896d1524dc7ee706bbde6e6215d7453
34707 F20101203_AABRRB cowley_c_Page_31.QC.jpg
0be036a2cc1a7954fb6bada5309a5591
2af599149aed14d28f7117abff36b1c22e518e98
1051982 F20101203_AABRTZ cowley_c_Page_21.jp2
5130647c3e3e91c429af72b2116d0ac6
0a030ac9908ce6c68bfd136d7775aa99829bb39f
115419 F20101203_AABRYX cowley_c_Page_23.jpg
3d677d5732175560fb20273bc52e1fc3
665cf663fe7f83491d750f0fc0691ed13d4e24d1
1051958 F20101203_AABSAX cowley_c_Page_66.jp2
56a9772132258d6d4c143820d5e5118e
b5556ff9eba229f5fb62d9e10fcd369ee5c198df
2017 F20101203_AABRRC cowley_c_Page_03.QC.jpg
c3a06bf330bdc7f8997f06ba8660fae7
3d308ef4d9077a0372aefb8ba84f9583fabb8327
112176 F20101203_AABRWA cowley_c_Page_36.jpg
90560015bedc09f407f9308be63c8dc5
0536d5c1c2228282b27711a8ca53210c9463954f
112339 F20101203_AABRYY cowley_c_Page_27.jpg
0fce7dea3f72672553cdc9145a8bb694
29ab2e7b1c46544fb3f35f4872a52ae7442b541b
300754 F20101203_AABSAY cowley_c_Page_69.jp2
6d334d04e0e53244669afc47deaef5a9
0360393586791c4796eb990a08f4c7dec6c0e42c
F20101203_AABRRD cowley_c_Page_66.tif
1bff5db0f2712cc092a4750c2306e273
aa3e9d8305246750a016a5885d97d701d3490c64
37106 F20101203_AABRWB cowley_c_Page_54.QC.jpg
11988d6b596f370f606db8e01f7b28fe
2957a367271df3e3138ab31ede569a48f17e1332
114779 F20101203_AABRYZ cowley_c_Page_28.jpg
6024c726b1ccced0bb612938cdd776d4
cb1c35d1b390d0ccc6911a84731d2db57d136b3a
F20101203_AABSAZ cowley_c_Page_01.tif
25dc7554159f20c93f2cbdb13e765b3c
0bf3096461d613eb70a2f31576a1323c434bac74
F20101203_AABRRE cowley_c_Page_34.tif
294a1096c5d70f54cd3bce41b232a09f
e2a57a0b5f25c9a04a9fcf8d58cd30615024453a
110272 F20101203_AABRWC cowley_c_Page_60.jpg
4b24ed5934b35fb524493f3313ba51fd
d0166492e18a57d9b4942cdbef9ef25243eba1b6
F20101203_AABRRF cowley_c_Page_24.tif
353ab21e5c34919eb4dc1456ebd84d25
f331431a6c56ff8566dd9a95bb130e2876eddefd
2197 F20101203_AABRWD cowley_c_Page_48thm.jpg
8af1ef97e5f39d7bcb07906f95df0a59
d88b871c87690c88613a3e700c77c691f0f42a48
36404 F20101203_AABRRG cowley_c_Page_25.QC.jpg
499576738c61efb294528747ee073263
41a5d45cf209c2c3d460d4d9d00754595767c0c4
9004 F20101203_AABSDA cowley_c_Page_13thm.jpg
e31515624a1d7c19bdcec2842e97b5a3
39a7b71e322eb8368edc42afcc3b531358cf1103
30719 F20101203_AABRWE cowley_c_Page_05.jpg
b1cd0dd607db829c0205bd404f82d6cd
2b8d0c342d2368dfe8eaa9eed97e535f1fd95a4c
107416 F20101203_AABRRH cowley_c_Page_31.jpg
15f9fa66fe5339e70e4f5ce91f347db0
5b9ec74207ccf995b26502541ddf1cd24a1274fb
9368 F20101203_AABSDB cowley_c_Page_18thm.jpg
9dc85849ed7d5ed18f23b1d39207afc4
28ba888051d91368b65770032f2a3af6bb8cb617
1051919 F20101203_AABRWF cowley_c_Page_53.jp2
c0be1973e546681278be00dae9737199
d5a94b053424cecfc61cd420e7bc32ab44f7841e
35789 F20101203_AABRRI cowley_c_Page_63.QC.jpg
e23e65449e26e8ffbb89bb058e47cfa5
5e0754181148f6cceb3971f1a6f3e78712fa4978
36868 F20101203_AABSDC cowley_c_Page_21.QC.jpg
faa4b17dcbaed18267e05a02b0c9c774
79420617a0c5900c8636f317f671f084fa309e1e
846 F20101203_AABRWG cowley_c_Page_03thm.jpg
15887168249a42b6e0847069d8273c6a
18bc1bb5d7f7d38862de2fc8db2580cca4dd94e3
36303 F20101203_AABSDD cowley_c_Page_26.QC.jpg
13407e4a970bfc33cae91777a8690e65
cb96d46a8bca6d682894b036e49dbc2ffdc5bc0b
F20101203_AABRWH cowley_c_Page_67.tif
a57b40538514a94711cf8cddd7ff386c
950f531b49ec67c26353e2da82ca1bfb580c0ef2
33120 F20101203_AABRRJ cowley_c_Page_37.QC.jpg
d7fb3d3d272f26c59a0858637e3697c8
e0884925f6562dffb9724b105591a0bc1e603046
8973 F20101203_AABSDE cowley_c_Page_26thm.jpg
83876ff8f7fd4c4f2db0ce3abcfb7a42
c62fdcdd4c1fa590d5cc9bff8e67977ec756dc91
8907 F20101203_AABRWI cowley_c_Page_42thm.jpg
fe9ef14df1f39364a7a0f5a95826b8dd
d814143ca9f2ee0687ea0bca5361d9bdf59d01c7
F20101203_AABRRK cowley_c_Page_19.tif
ac7eb29f959536ae2311e612dda27b0f
bf00423676289461db18d4b88b0ea5f10943bb67
36598 F20101203_AABSDF cowley_c_Page_27.QC.jpg
d19b8af472020ae430301d2be5dbcf51
a35bb5f33e1602c4cf5e81f33e59ea557ac9cd85
112979 F20101203_AABRRL cowley_c_Page_15.jpg
b094e8c25f0b58750c38dc4e0e7b2719
132e8aeaa4bc29b199e0f04564e79ab721ba40be
36858 F20101203_AABSDG cowley_c_Page_28.QC.jpg
60f0d239e4197df648b2cd129a38b257
6b828735bb802c65ac8fb1b5d17785caff7e9a31
F20101203_AABRWJ cowley_c_Page_62.tif
353dd2c8fa3bc4cb21351617321ecaee
8e7d1628e05af35bfb0614dc802c5e1f5ab402e9
36661 F20101203_AABRRM cowley_c_Page_15.QC.jpg
cf472104d7682f212a320280936436a6
1320cccb0d22a37e317c04b9c59d13135cd28eba
8743 F20101203_AABSDH cowley_c_Page_30thm.jpg
a1b71afbf51c595d5913bedbd5736aa9
89127b0b2615ce113843fc4911ad76c5d84d687a
36427 F20101203_AABRWK cowley_c_Page_57.QC.jpg
c2b73e0771d5c0b0d760d746541f7867
029b3227b21fb31ef8f05f7683b9a5208121e5b1
1051922 F20101203_AABRRN cowley_c_Page_45.jp2
453a2a3800b3c5b86742fe2ef3dcd0b3
0c0d45eba240a9e7f62d9892a9ec11390fd2fc06
9090 F20101203_AABSDI cowley_c_Page_33thm.jpg
268718cb74581c5da8344aa2a9dbd00b
9bc49446b7cfe6c730b3bac3b7297e3e4499f1fb
111869 F20101203_AABRWL cowley_c_Page_14.jpg
5dc5610bd11e8097f84e14788394942f
4c356e72111e1cf34983666a52e3d1f27cdb6586
F20101203_AABRRO cowley_c_Page_64.jp2
46c81f0556184104bf8835da6b5302e7
eac1d451705a37c897d9a71b2db2a08030fa4d62
8965 F20101203_AABSDJ cowley_c_Page_35thm.jpg
ed26cbec1b4b5fbebf5d11484f54f686
c9438cfc76241283777c284c4a3bd02071dd3d3f
F20101203_AABRWM cowley_c_Page_02.tif
bc129bfbe33e3bc6c6dae159097a26ba
9ac4b8c4d26ee876524bd94544d694db070bccf8
1051972 F20101203_AABRRP cowley_c_Page_63.jp2
0d32a6a9e7b1e90d36c849e88dde4012
29c271b323620754896c7024ac4c741230eb77d6
36351 F20101203_AABSDK cowley_c_Page_36.QC.jpg
068cde7fc1945d48b5f8633550d5d559
244ceb38b06e278ba20a185f7415788f3c88b184
F20101203_AABRWN cowley_c_Page_27.jp2
409964abb15593c1658973f23f696ae3
93ea644c08b32c10cb430fe218fa25efe5febf37
9274 F20101203_AABRRQ cowley_c_Page_57thm.jpg
499f9488a39b8fcfc2878b914e4d0e46
03cd2188038e404d3d3cf8817123873d1e363b3e
8162 F20101203_AABSDL cowley_c_Page_37thm.jpg
0f10c21c8b327203aaaa9ef87d71f510
983c0fd9a2629bb418be6378b2d4d5271fc6ffca
111746 F20101203_AABRRR cowley_c_Page_26.jpg
103b85bbc7a78ca8f7664a7dc771fbeb
8a295e51dd42bf118e4f4bff1f6d0ca6f585d241
9244 F20101203_AABSDM cowley_c_Page_38thm.jpg
a3542712467c98528dd177dd771a6730
1a0724b5a4e20249ab19ee5e8328ef479cad470f
F20101203_AABRWO cowley_c_Page_35.jp2
00ce76634300a98cf8509aa4dd1978ff
f8cb17fe1575c315f981eb35078fd6bd2002d411
F20101203_AABRRS cowley_c_Page_63.tif
94f14ed5f29910267d8776deaf279aa1
acf33e9b1e37080155cce8e8d5244d1f33075b1b
36827 F20101203_AABSDN cowley_c_Page_41.QC.jpg
fbda524897d02cb9093a9038cd59c301
27e572807b3ee297ca7c79e00213d7fcd81c95ba
F20101203_AABRWP cowley_c_Page_50.tif
f8daedd49ddc4e6c62e0412e595492dd
ab238ca578bd4c563342cf52a986009a729a3918
111886 F20101203_AABRRT cowley_c_Page_57.jpg
c507190bbdbd03333fb23c4f637afa16
0d0e5fc367df10d4345cf8e0f751547d9f2b3fee
35329 F20101203_AABSDO cowley_c_Page_42.QC.jpg
5d2070c4204197d688108a00570d3ae7
d4ad86927b4eed18cade25369a15dfa32af092b8
132592 F20101203_AABRWQ cowley_c_Page_24.jpg
55f6dc277fd5b62a9114a0262f796685
273325f1a9f9317e09bff93b58bd5463a50b0013
F20101203_AABRRU cowley_c_Page_52thm.jpg
17f19e47e6395178b2cad54f9127ba04
ee18f5c3413762a717dd7d56386e982aa3eff4a6
34843 F20101203_AABSDP cowley_c_Page_43.QC.jpg
a1600452c079cf11fe788864cb8554ba
1b0aaf85ad1b67873013900488026332ea9c8276
7217 F20101203_AABRWR cowley_c_Page_65thm.jpg
cea73d6cd416f88a044c6a6b39364be1
d3ff27750c2822d73cd8483c0c64dcbc46c4a4e3
9204 F20101203_AABRRV cowley_c_Page_19thm.jpg
7da663022a04c55dea24bfbe50693b76
2488629527c4f6d4917c9bb9e17a6eb1412f9742
34845 F20101203_AABSDQ cowley_c_Page_45.QC.jpg
02920a611935597108d1fc52792fc347
29e2bdc5fcfb576537f977d941ee213c7ec04fb8
9241 F20101203_AABRWS cowley_c_Page_47thm.jpg
d54180a5314125adf2dd0be68b1e3a89
e515d25c1f45d42422d7d339788d40453f00549a
92082 F20101203_AABRRW cowley_c_Page_29.jpg
61c11a3f1350a585bf8da54e6d813017
79ed700311bf6d0cbdb153e75ae286691475e1c0
8136 F20101203_AABSDR cowley_c_Page_46thm.jpg
0811d23cd074ef9907cf2f64970a46df
103e21a892167fcdd8786ac99844c93616928743
34420 F20101203_AABRWT cowley_c_Page_09.QC.jpg
f8c5b9eb0e2c85ab31844e4ac5069255
d69ce96a4c505850c4132ec38df86461208d93d3
F20101203_AABRRX cowley_c_Page_22.tif
da4fc3217afc14e4d9f8600788ea7e71
eb93917d27ce411b8c3157fdeb9b88ebdf8c8a5c
35632 F20101203_AABSDS cowley_c_Page_49.QC.jpg
de94495e5de7202856a4768d67351703
4c0a928cd6db4b356a7e332930d58f5fb2dd5a9a
F20101203_AABRWU cowley_c_Page_33.tif
d25959b73d895ea5aa294aa6598d068e
4bdde6b55d29d84ba06fbc1c41df0819e0b00068
942859 F20101203_AABRRY cowley_c_Page_07.jp2
26462cd2d0cb1757c8c6c34099e34848
b6cbc9c653c47d1e4f0b3a0827a410bb04539efb
8423 F20101203_AABSDT cowley_c_Page_49thm.jpg
904bdeca48114420d77b866c5c253650
681cc0ce809e8ea4655ea6ad331503e72b02a66c
F20101203_AABRWV cowley_c_Page_29.tif
7dbbc6de1854399da1550da1d162ab28
e4dc77157bb36acd01567cb09be74cbae558d054
1051949 F20101203_AABRRZ cowley_c_Page_12.jp2
4ab254e017c874144c1cfc8f7c6741e9
98c6a0b7d75083d28672c1f843d844e7ef2a75bf
8932 F20101203_AABSDU cowley_c_Page_51thm.jpg
c379550b26543e059712e237d17efe92
1ef3cc61a8c64f79594c537dd9f3b89039d3bc7f
8966 F20101203_AABRWW cowley_c_Page_15thm.jpg
75da1414250edd5ccfe4fb37c48f23d4
c5bb488163cbe2b22df48084e233e4e5acab7239
9110 F20101203_AABSDV cowley_c_Page_54thm.jpg
12a4694f37114f5616540e3942e128f1
55ab019db8d3d3719583f61f0803c898471ac4c0
8532 F20101203_AABRWX cowley_c_Page_43thm.jpg
4522bd08581a98c26ee06066f9941496
20accafb19aa0da2b1f114bb070d36bfcd912a7c
37637 F20101203_AABSDW cowley_c_Page_55.QC.jpg
486f36ec8bf10670453e41852cf93d3d
ab91268f432123b992e22008697516087099243d
8922 F20101203_AABRUA cowley_c_Page_61thm.jpg
b6afbdb8659653668ba03976682d4b61
e5b8db7d2a55afe8942a6ebcf12f75d0459a102a
F20101203_AABRWY cowley_c_Page_23.tif
7a88b1d4e15d92505d57782021aeecf8
c67714edd78656d7d810e6cf670ec0d27e2af16d
36521 F20101203_AABSDX cowley_c_Page_56.QC.jpg
ad2a12d4babbfadc4b90562eebbac98a
7938859445230653911be613c96f2e0bce80cf51
1051892 F20101203_AABRUB cowley_c_Page_57.jp2
abaa8fcef0fc83501f38404bdf08ce5f
48593f52996988fd474e54c19904299eae80b865
F20101203_AABRWZ cowley_c_Page_15.jp2
2fb647a0fff5aa8c40829ce5a9a3dde7
99392e0a6596b821587f433ea9e66f8223309a9e
9045 F20101203_AABSDY cowley_c_Page_59thm.jpg
a3633d7cb05da6d2e9eb64e7ddff00b4
11e34ac338b385edd33fc5ed61c494da099e3e64
F20101203_AABRUC cowley_c_Page_36.jp2
765ce3c7df5ddcaee7da766c31abd86f
8f0c269f8ece2c2f3b96e0c418335a58e4469713
110896 F20101203_AABRZA cowley_c_Page_30.jpg
c513c57dbbfc85380f3213e680ae3199
8ba49f258439193ec7cbcda62fea71c34d0bfb30
F20101203_AABSBA cowley_c_Page_03.tif
229feae247fc7da8e80772b3bb1fe5a1
d4c3a0ef1336a53e2cde26eca3bd7f49269abc10
37694 F20101203_AABSDZ cowley_c_Page_62.QC.jpg
be38e9f2bfc1665f378a133f166c8194
bc836caf34cb9bc5d9b68939f40967e9e3244f32
F20101203_AABRUD cowley_c_Page_61.tif
d9b70234231e81b42f1d2e2689178a81
c550bb1d8b9f76bba81ada009b9563cd0ad15035
127993 F20101203_AABRZB cowley_c_Page_32.jpg
fa2d6f2b43449933726ca3ddf0837ac3
44da413b701b7ef4240d4d267a68b6218a4b786c
F20101203_AABSBB cowley_c_Page_05.tif
63dd8d340069a95f763429b8ea0e0bfe
ddeb443f4e9b5451ca09d727c9c4167cbb9bdfae
112971 F20101203_AABRUE cowley_c_Page_25.jpg
6d43f5e5f2aea8a9858c4feb066a25d1
57d86112793763b718ebf859a547c480e23c35eb
111522 F20101203_AABRZC cowley_c_Page_33.jpg
7139362e82b9b20a8fa3bc38200475fb
13afc95af1c490c9e494ff940a844f44e189ccde
F20101203_AABSBC cowley_c_Page_07.tif
900fb4ecdd88ab39feaa01e5de8a3ba1
a3ffd544b6568d94480a6bbf96abf008c17947f8
9165 F20101203_AABRUF cowley_c_Page_21thm.jpg
8ca0a599d7d88c4bc2f8d1852ca78273
2a0b7155d809128c404a0b2b4782df380e773a35
111613 F20101203_AABRZD cowley_c_Page_34.jpg
912156306a0559af1850a23663f72413
0bc4d55141cdde31ae9f26352b2287a71af8c752
F20101203_AABSBD cowley_c_Page_08.tif
97acbff492c005ca5f46b9588b6d8e6a
14a70952ddbfe40eadaff7efdeb13ea281560f01
9188 F20101203_AABRUG cowley_c_Page_28thm.jpg
075a96c1874280726380a4986a1bed50
4ad445b7f24acf8ef7c75013d0b7e7b614b2c4f4
119132 F20101203_AABRZE cowley_c_Page_35.jpg
0e6afc83c481b6b6a142d007c0c75b10
3ac0802da536025880f788d80047c81613b24907
F20101203_AABSBE cowley_c_Page_09.tif
5f0c32413f8c9682743abf4ea1920e45
1e6cd87d25771a3efa1a2450bb862166426ccdda
36316 F20101203_AABRUH cowley_c_Page_33.QC.jpg
87883fb0e1ad5bd393ca73658e6cc9fa
c2ddd6b0d9e79cf51db6f22c454f22ae609c732f
F20101203_AABSBF cowley_c_Page_12.tif
bdef7a0e0599043159ce88aaac213bb6
faa247a559c669a3161f97f9d1e84babed11cf54
F20101203_AABRUI cowley_c_Page_64.tif
32f0c53eea6c69bd43eb69d762062b80
0fecf5743028d49fef6f022d3e13b692a2b13079
107087 F20101203_AABRZF cowley_c_Page_37.jpg
b55683c61ff4e8bb5ac9c03a37fb2fa2
d95c61eefa01e5c30fb14ec7463b364b2233ff42
F20101203_AABSBG cowley_c_Page_15.tif
1aa6c502d82780d6a7abfcd4e605c917
003e342109ff6a25ee83f838c87dba445a8c33cb
110153 F20101203_AABRUJ cowley_c_Page_42.jpg
8ac28a436d3980c5db77de6e3ba7898b
d234c8665295e9788e99a2b3f2ed2363e49f755c
112748 F20101203_AABRZG cowley_c_Page_43.jpg
3975ffcac7cc5fbd144f853e9cff4069
a4417058c40fbbef938c675174d84ebdc989bbf8
F20101203_AABSBH cowley_c_Page_18.tif
851559ff1cddf121a29111b9231b9351
9d11d0f63d557abb0673db2604bb0649c95cfc0a
36413 F20101203_AABRUK cowley_c_Page_59.QC.jpg
0c5de2a33cf791e07c9aa7f2fb625dcb
146d86b203fa268f02157eb1c85d19ea9521ce2f
111192 F20101203_AABRZH cowley_c_Page_44.jpg
9c8618cec74ebb16ff133dabeaf24bba
93c7d6426c750077cf2f6058a1f0d5db092cd291
F20101203_AABSBI cowley_c_Page_26.tif
33d5a5b9ddeabb28295a1173f80b2138
f645d86c24f340f5daf627469b2d4d7c807fd5cc
F20101203_AABRUL cowley_c_Page_40.tif
1e3e913b1641e7e1998245e7f3aa64ee
0f1d2b3ade495fda675b05c87366516929b79716
112367 F20101203_AABRZI cowley_c_Page_45.jpg
ab75ef8c7f9b5d7a8f0c2663127d312a
f77dcc6b1a52f5ad8e896950d65e4ab0dea68c53
F20101203_AABSBJ cowley_c_Page_27.tif
844a59015f166c2e6177008309d8acd3
3e045427cd0accf92deeff699a1756d082a8ffed
113320 F20101203_AABRZJ cowley_c_Page_47.jpg
f9a1e5a49471ec876a2a948b0b3a5480
f40fbb6b7a52b8b0e856595908cb6e1fceedc496
F20101203_AABSBK cowley_c_Page_28.tif
e2d57af2674aedf3514e860b299acf54
072cec4bc68ff2ede52c156145f4ab95d55fdbf3
1001800 F20101203_AABRUM cowley_c_Page_67.jp2
b97e78af60fd9735b00dd39b268d91a6
aabb671d85aefda439a1ce51ab2e33eedbe37019
23665 F20101203_AABRZK cowley_c_Page_48.jpg
e6114e8d382d4ca8a625d5e434e7c8bc
977d431151ff86d82819f1efcd2548b6171b16d5
F20101203_AABSBL cowley_c_Page_30.tif
0eb7bf4a1f659b4c065dbad78456873a
82e90172c26513108ff46e4ffaa952da33a02eee
38223 F20101203_AABRUN cowley_c_Page_32.QC.jpg
d623c6a5105509dc9d31d6d34955f40c
2e1d7cf7ec0d36ea7b838ba9afc3ff8240f1aff6
107979 F20101203_AABRZL cowley_c_Page_49.jpg
daf1351d5fdcc71e012712f51fe4b243
a21802e0e667335106467c18f15750c8ce8f4c67
35497 F20101203_AABRUO cowley_c_Page_40.QC.jpg
47383ef9a5d56565265610767d3780e6
bee05f614a1984ad42c356670200b15347266365
112004 F20101203_AABRZM cowley_c_Page_50.jpg
fda5dbfeed489e17aee5cebb61d15f03
34720a952e986360cedbbbff7b478b17d059b887
F20101203_AABSBM cowley_c_Page_32.tif
afe76191e6bf7f8de287506d2f6a8ca4
372cc1f029e0f794570b760929503419bc3fd967
114130 F20101203_AABRUP cowley_c_Page_58.jpg
e6a3bae0a660d61be6490a656467014b
de8b7ea1239522e302cb04a30df327fe266e7ab8
111577 F20101203_AABRZN cowley_c_Page_51.jpg
b48da8429749c92b0697e8fcd6bc06b6
5ff005f6be201aa32e6e8df503d70e90d8b980c2
F20101203_AABSBN cowley_c_Page_39.tif
7db374d4fd013f30214e1ca95c5fa06a
4e98e6d721f6b63dd5097e74a0fee31cfab990b5
1276 F20101203_AABRUQ cowley_c_Page_02.QC.jpg
780ec13285bd97a9abdf983a3b345747
3f8b6cb584fd66ebb2f22fd1a6aab628046fed28
111373 F20101203_AABRZO cowley_c_Page_52.jpg
d41791053180b6ce48fd892b17e7bb16
11d6a8d76e6f7be10800ae900ef0d7204e76bfd2
F20101203_AABSBO cowley_c_Page_43.tif
108479d0c1d62c373b1e6e513a101721
d6d312ac7f7d1221d2482bc566646cdd04b37b79
1051965 F20101203_AABRUR cowley_c_Page_24.jp2
5b7090f6fe36ccc11eef1fdcbc0aa471
3e83abcb3741be4aa5365ffec67afab3cb6376db
114735 F20101203_AABRZP cowley_c_Page_53.jpg
835c00f50826d455de9bf4277cba3989
19dbc26cb15a8bebce10672d2485058c0d47a88e
F20101203_AABSBP cowley_c_Page_45.tif
042258510c7b6f3986f435da56086a48
3c473619524ca82bdcdf3343f4a08779ee2e73ab
F20101203_AABRUS cowley_c_Page_41.tif
d1e1e575450c2e4448be95cd1517a5da
cb4adb7d1b3e74c9ca58e52c7ecf7b3ead959e70
112287 F20101203_AABRZQ cowley_c_Page_54.jpg
abd397a86dc8dae187cd7b6afd0862fc
837627ca6e0cca11234a9659b4d38d5504826b0d
F20101203_AABSBQ cowley_c_Page_46.tif
24d111aa5dbc275d0c3629fff16f9229
37367fe8daa1003b2b1721159edb828828a0cbfa
F20101203_AABRUT cowley_c_Page_42.tif
7f7b704ab15f321d474c405b653a61e4
9ef45166a6472995e8094123461445fbd5426d5b
F20101203_AABSBR cowley_c_Page_48.tif
a4d8dd04e5881f26692b2d47cc2acb2c
36f2b9714732768c1da2371422d87352fb26c500
8486 F20101203_AABRUU cowley_c_Page_45thm.jpg
2c3d2fdcc677b324cfd08deaf961635a
5252f421ac83cac7864c09ebc0bac99ae8dd8542
112615 F20101203_AABRZR cowley_c_Page_56.jpg
5b42edd36eb3f228ab20e94ad1aec2ec
d25fea752b86a7a481068bde07915e7512582a36
F20101203_AABSBS cowley_c_Page_51.tif
f4069bd558d643763175718070399c27
5f7ea8afb5f250b12a1589018726503582877e2b
7682 F20101203_AABRUV cowley_c_Page_48.QC.jpg
deb20d403a38a24b7c303b637b6d01e9
26cfcb1720090152a2ceda0c5a4eb46b9f058b04
115192 F20101203_AABRZS cowley_c_Page_61.jpg
b871732c4224c4e29682a34d4f8621e6
6576e5dca3bb35fa37e530a9dbc2010efb78da1a
F20101203_AABSBT cowley_c_Page_55.tif
fff2c5b20f648a59c412f73783db57b9
15c6b219db1546cab24e8786f36d1293ef98186a
113174 F20101203_AABRUW cowley_c_Page_21.jpg
d34d784efaa701a2b269ca00cd26f780
ac6c4692d09dc8bfc64ee408a2e9ec6006ce0326
119662 F20101203_AABRZT cowley_c_Page_62.jpg
1da29f56636899da6a7ed10dcfae8970
55af87d90b74d75b151cb22c321e64c608e2e4fe
F20101203_AABSBU cowley_c_Page_56.tif
bd817391fcec1b5df7cd418329f27ae8
7e7f3e8da12ad4f0d5e03791e672ca64c0bffa89
113273 F20101203_AABRUX cowley_c_Page_64.jpg
9b8e0411415357873fabb1834f44377b
5e8ef5196f990d7bcbbd0bed0c5eb5c98f099223
115299 F20101203_AABRZU cowley_c_Page_63.jpg
386c0e487740d5ce80ed17921f29bd43
1e40513e007e0ad3ec8b696e198a60803ea679bf
F20101203_AABSBV cowley_c_Page_58.tif
37b2a81c3bc1f48b0b92c17795eac893
bf03f3c273907fd10efe398460d22a266b93899a
F20101203_AABRUY cowley_c_Page_17.jp2
39b359c39168af0fb589e07f0f71172a
699f04786d7e11c2aec6c1b03cb318f900b43d56
17901 F20101203_AABRZV cowley_c_Page_68.jpg
c85a3880093464b0fe4fbbfaccce85ca
fb8331566686fe77a67e2a1f111428e0c0d17634
F20101203_AABSBW cowley_c_Page_60.tif
477c227ddb6a9a37af3d7bf8b156eeea
4081b75e622c740d9e10e17b158fdf632358d32b
37411 F20101203_AABRSA cowley_c_Page_23.QC.jpg
c916544e27b14a367cf0d422e9d3b732
8e93bc1d587a45c32a4e92f1a9f2202d58fa36c6
36093 F20101203_AABRUZ cowley_c_Page_17.QC.jpg
5f52063b29a348cb493ffaaf6fecb484
7b7255ec72f5cf80d6de8c44c9dad018042ddb5b
61155 F20101203_AABRZW cowley_c_Page_03.jp2
d7b94db065b3bc0d804b5c80db27cf61
856398b60841c6949266e4d4e85722c3c501a158
F20101203_AABSBX cowley_c_Page_68.tif
22e5358f1e39b09f19bff9faed9a61b2
fd64504745526ddfc39c73cef32979bb41d76a8d
9073 F20101203_AABRSB cowley_c_Page_58thm.jpg
0937241eafe6361e3fb72a9762689627
35c228fdd2b548a20c64f41cbb9dc174a7e33777
1051923 F20101203_AABRZX cowley_c_Page_04.jp2
ce360b9de318895e9ff80f0333ea26aa
60cd454caf50037882e9a504b36f4958db9a5cfc
F20101203_AABRSC cowley_c_Page_11.tif
5baab80022adcebb0d5efdd24d4902d9
5118c35ca58215b99b08c39159eecac3bb2aa82c
F20101203_AABRXA cowley_c_Page_36thm.jpg
6728e5f1f5932ab0facfe5d79eeb9e8b
c496cb1b5d1f961994072b8d0b8b9c49e8cb5f15
747569 F20101203_AABRZY cowley_c_Page_06.jp2
cea6b98a0981a4c3e7f754bad847524d
900a0d497d0ebc7b6b646bae28fe1b0684cbb6e7
202011 F20101203_AABSBY cowley_c.pdf
c94b44ad3ed68cc071dbeb54a6d561bc
bf0420b0084a888eca2bd8eddf4dd7149f70ed50
1051968 F20101203_AABRSD cowley_c_Page_62.jp2
b520fcf41201720562816c91e760abb5
e18d7304d6ae72ca9c8ce78dc4ba3f657d763b50
36166 F20101203_AABRXB cowley_c_Page_51.QC.jpg
65caf93f061312777aa23c972d25ad8f
899599b5289fd1865d7b78ad485e0eb45186e0ea
793938 F20101203_AABRZZ cowley_c_Page_08.jp2
a62f1cfc73000ee994e6e20398ece89f
7171348328b055af84ef1e4ffc5044df2cb966b0
9163 F20101203_AABSBZ cowley_c_Page_27thm.jpg
41c98898407e753c56205dd94d9fa4f5
4a1a82d61d2c24ebc64f332271c9575e12619d4b
102320 F20101203_AABRSE cowley_c_Page_16.jpg
02be74c75be14ecc28cad7379156c0bf
daa8bdebd6441722c48d2b73cd18dd57300f551f
1051951 F20101203_AABRXC cowley_c_Page_23.jp2
f11a389fc7cee952fde85da2eb5f5a4c
4e61650941f0c4a9138bd26d9d9bcc773334d68c
4021 F20101203_AABRSF cowley_c_Page_02.jpg
02937a302aa4ae93ef6c210ffe3e3b2d
1db1f8753ac6efc515b0fc23942616559afb6670
8927 F20101203_AABSEA cowley_c_Page_62thm.jpg
2d4c6f545145373cb8f63dbfa698f1a9
39cc438287ede940b2f8022c7518068aace88043
F20101203_AABRXD cowley_c_Page_31.tif
359c743bbffd8887adceccd7faf85d01
3f532db9df59f3b27d7d0c2e13ef27717f3bdc68
88198 F20101203_AABRSG cowley_c_Page_67.jpg
29639aabf18ae58bafb96654e55e2961
2a613060f767cf41b97bbbcbaa7a3e23d346ce96
8813 F20101203_AABSEB cowley_c_Page_63thm.jpg
f2f8a303ea6e4e078ddc7ed18154b503
24e2da3c54ff9e13370f6c68f53a7feb60dd076e
F20101203_AABRXE cowley_c_Page_37.jp2
8660f21810a60181af4ec01165fa252a
2b2554bedd2c400716f3dcada29e89f553a85340
F20101203_AABRSH cowley_c_Page_14thm.jpg
5122781f0ad13e7bc8f439cf977e73ad
6caf531df207ff749ad3c60b11bcb2938018ea93
29600 F20101203_AABSEC cowley_c_Page_65.QC.jpg
b78039ce142e68279e74c3c2b53af122
ca62286d8874aa3b744c0a61829e800938a2a442
F20101203_AABRXF cowley_c_Page_38.jp2
ea93323b50beea34ce725fcfe4760b81
40134497a313ae0a5344b40d45f9a3f50df3df83
1051906 F20101203_AABRSI cowley_c_Page_46.jp2
cb1ba8a5447073a87b7ea5c1fdce7a1f
67ebbb3147cb58714f9ae0c5bb407df8c4802b26
31775 F20101203_AABSED cowley_c_Page_66.QC.jpg
da6d0442e2b083eb79a107ea082ea9de
165a57e902d60b480c647c3eb53a18a365434e3d
1051977 F20101203_AABRXG cowley_c_Page_59.jp2
81d1abdda7e03393c9c2b554e18deb46
3472c60340d78b081ae2e9b4aad00683ef976cd2
9270 F20101203_AABRSJ cowley_c_Page_56thm.jpg
517e7259575cbbf50fcd2e9399621ef9
26de26bb1089d82e45e10925c84edce5df544a54
6430 F20101203_AABSEE cowley_c_Page_68.QC.jpg
d30508d5cf804074d0c82e8a29109d56
62fd0c1b41721a7c941f7acb66eb247153f0b205
36918 F20101203_AABRXH cowley_c_Page_47.QC.jpg
23596872a4edc1cc22bc3798c7e12758
6e17ad9cc402ee72d6ca2a05564352b84aa9f058
10178 F20101203_AABSEF cowley_c_Page_69.QC.jpg
be299b353e7cfd12a39d2e797a25617b
d4ffb85df2740bca468be464c88d0a153d8668f3
F20101203_AABRXI cowley_c_Page_37.tif
a3cca6ef529a3471409a8dca47b25eba
21a29c8e14b57743614e602bee7ee207e7343a53
8087 F20101203_AABRSK cowley_c_Page_16thm.jpg
525d326466fa58e62c0e8a8742897162
6723ddef84ddf9997793071e7640dacfc0666459
991204 F20101203_AABRXJ cowley_c_Page_65.jp2
7ef4a0cf9ec71421b6f4a9a8070bd3e2
23b6aa92447151a2c8c3cc6b07e3982849430b97
1051970 F20101203_AABRSL cowley_c_Page_52.jp2
8bbd8126b7989a1699cbd8cafb29bbe5
78c3f95e37fa23ba09f6fa6075eb61f28ca3837f