<%BANNER%>

Ethnicity and Jewish Identity in Josephus

Permanent Link: http://ufdc.ufl.edu/UFE0021949/00001

Material Information

Title: Ethnicity and Jewish Identity in Josephus
Physical Description: 1 online resource (297 p.)
Language: english
Publisher: University of Florida
Place of Publication: Gainesville, Fla.
Publication Date: 2008

Subjects

Subjects / Keywords: ethnicity, jewish, josephus
Classics -- Dissertations, Academic -- UF
Genre: Classical Studies thesis, Ph.D.
bibliography   ( marcgt )
theses   ( marcgt )
government publication (state, provincial, terriorial, dependent)   ( marcgt )
born-digital   ( sobekcm )
Electronic Thesis or Dissertation

Notes

Abstract: Flavius Josephus was a Jewish historian who lived in the first century CE. When the First Jewish War began in 66 CE, Josephus was given a leading role in the defense of Galilee in northern Palestine. He was captured by the Roman forces and accompanied them to Jerusalem where he witnessed the fall of the city in 70 CE. After that Josephus was taken to Rome where he wrote an account of the Jewish war with Rome (the Bellum Judaicum), a history of the Jews (the Antiquitates Judaicae), a short autobiography (the Vita), and a defense of the antiquity of the Jews (the Contra Apionem). All of these works were intended for a non-Jewish audience. Josephus wrote at a time when anti-Jewish sentiments were common, and the recent defeat at the hands of Rome only exacerbated the negative image ascribed to Jews. It is the thesis of this dissertation that Josephus produced his literary works not simply to satisfy the curiosity of interested Gentiles concerning Jewish origins and customs, but to craft and negotiate an ethnicity for the Jews that would portray them as a people worthy of Roman respect. Ethnic identity is a social construct that is shaped in a complex matrix of psychological and social factors, and often in response to a perceived crisis that threatens a person?s or group?s sense of social belonging. Josephus lived under the kinds of conditions in which groups typically feel the need to adjust and reassert their social identity. I suggest that this lens can provide a useful way of reading Josephus, and can account for the shape and purpose of his works. Josephus' strategy for creating this ethnic portrait was to depict the Jews as having essentially the same qualities of the noble Greeks of the past, whom the Romans respected. In this undertaking Josephus was participating in a long-standing debate within Jewish circles over the limits and extent of Hellenization among them. What was new was that Josephus used the vehicle of Greek historiography to accomplish his purpose. All of his literary works drew heavily on well-known Greek historiographical models for their presentations of the events, their characterizations of the Jewish people, and their refutations of Gentile slanders. The result was a picture of Jewish history and piety in which the Jews are seen to embody well-respected Greek ideals. It is not known how widely Josephus? works circulated in his own day or shortly thereafter, nor do we know how successful they were in their purpose of creating a bold, new picture of Jewish identity. There are indications that Josephus? works did not effect much change in how Gentiles viewed Jews in the Roman empire. However, the success of the project (measured in terms of social acceptance) is not the object of this study, nor is it a criterion for judging the importance of what Josephus wrote. One of the enduring values of Josephus? works is that they demonstrate, in antiquity, an attempt by a marginalized group to negotiate an ethnicity, and thus they provide an important window into the complexities of Jewish life in the Roman empire.
General Note: In the series University of Florida Digital Collections.
General Note: Includes vita.
Bibliography: Includes bibliographical references.
Source of Description: Description based on online resource; title from PDF title page.
Source of Description: This bibliographic record is available under the Creative Commons CC0 public domain dedication. The University of Florida Libraries, as creator of this bibliographic record, has waived all rights to it worldwide under copyright law, including all related and neighboring rights, to the extent allowed by law.
Thesis: Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of Florida, 2008.
Local: Adviser: Kapparis, Konstantin.

Record Information

Source Institution: UFRGP
Rights Management: Applicable rights reserved.
Classification: lcc - LD1780 2008
System ID: UFE0021949:00001

Permanent Link: http://ufdc.ufl.edu/UFE0021949/00001

Material Information

Title: Ethnicity and Jewish Identity in Josephus
Physical Description: 1 online resource (297 p.)
Language: english
Publisher: University of Florida
Place of Publication: Gainesville, Fla.
Publication Date: 2008

Subjects

Subjects / Keywords: ethnicity, jewish, josephus
Classics -- Dissertations, Academic -- UF
Genre: Classical Studies thesis, Ph.D.
bibliography   ( marcgt )
theses   ( marcgt )
government publication (state, provincial, terriorial, dependent)   ( marcgt )
born-digital   ( sobekcm )
Electronic Thesis or Dissertation

Notes

Abstract: Flavius Josephus was a Jewish historian who lived in the first century CE. When the First Jewish War began in 66 CE, Josephus was given a leading role in the defense of Galilee in northern Palestine. He was captured by the Roman forces and accompanied them to Jerusalem where he witnessed the fall of the city in 70 CE. After that Josephus was taken to Rome where he wrote an account of the Jewish war with Rome (the Bellum Judaicum), a history of the Jews (the Antiquitates Judaicae), a short autobiography (the Vita), and a defense of the antiquity of the Jews (the Contra Apionem). All of these works were intended for a non-Jewish audience. Josephus wrote at a time when anti-Jewish sentiments were common, and the recent defeat at the hands of Rome only exacerbated the negative image ascribed to Jews. It is the thesis of this dissertation that Josephus produced his literary works not simply to satisfy the curiosity of interested Gentiles concerning Jewish origins and customs, but to craft and negotiate an ethnicity for the Jews that would portray them as a people worthy of Roman respect. Ethnic identity is a social construct that is shaped in a complex matrix of psychological and social factors, and often in response to a perceived crisis that threatens a person?s or group?s sense of social belonging. Josephus lived under the kinds of conditions in which groups typically feel the need to adjust and reassert their social identity. I suggest that this lens can provide a useful way of reading Josephus, and can account for the shape and purpose of his works. Josephus' strategy for creating this ethnic portrait was to depict the Jews as having essentially the same qualities of the noble Greeks of the past, whom the Romans respected. In this undertaking Josephus was participating in a long-standing debate within Jewish circles over the limits and extent of Hellenization among them. What was new was that Josephus used the vehicle of Greek historiography to accomplish his purpose. All of his literary works drew heavily on well-known Greek historiographical models for their presentations of the events, their characterizations of the Jewish people, and their refutations of Gentile slanders. The result was a picture of Jewish history and piety in which the Jews are seen to embody well-respected Greek ideals. It is not known how widely Josephus? works circulated in his own day or shortly thereafter, nor do we know how successful they were in their purpose of creating a bold, new picture of Jewish identity. There are indications that Josephus? works did not effect much change in how Gentiles viewed Jews in the Roman empire. However, the success of the project (measured in terms of social acceptance) is not the object of this study, nor is it a criterion for judging the importance of what Josephus wrote. One of the enduring values of Josephus? works is that they demonstrate, in antiquity, an attempt by a marginalized group to negotiate an ethnicity, and thus they provide an important window into the complexities of Jewish life in the Roman empire.
General Note: In the series University of Florida Digital Collections.
General Note: Includes vita.
Bibliography: Includes bibliographical references.
Source of Description: Description based on online resource; title from PDF title page.
Source of Description: This bibliographic record is available under the Creative Commons CC0 public domain dedication. The University of Florida Libraries, as creator of this bibliographic record, has waived all rights to it worldwide under copyright law, including all related and neighboring rights, to the extent allowed by law.
Thesis: Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of Florida, 2008.
Local: Adviser: Kapparis, Konstantin.

Record Information

Source Institution: UFRGP
Rights Management: Applicable rights reserved.
Classification: lcc - LD1780 2008
System ID: UFE0021949:00001


This item has the following downloads:


Full Text
xml version 1.0 encoding UTF-8
REPORT xmlns http:www.fcla.edudlsmddaitss xmlns:xsi http:www.w3.org2001XMLSchema-instance xsi:schemaLocation http:www.fcla.edudlsmddaitssdaitssReport.xsd
INGEST IEID E20101111_AAAABI INGEST_TIME 2010-11-11T13:58:50Z PACKAGE UFE0021949_00001
AGREEMENT_INFO ACCOUNT UF PROJECT UFDC
FILES
FILE SIZE 6639 DFID F20101111_AAAZSF ORIGIN DEPOSITOR PATH mcclister_d_Page_257thm.jpg GLOBAL false PRESERVATION BIT MESSAGE_DIGEST ALGORITHM MD5
0ef4dd6d43b1dd93b23644a6d86166c8
SHA-1
120d111c3315debc6c81358877271b903c85ff7c
26951 F20101111_AAAXYT mcclister_d_Page_093.QC.jpg
9708ff78b1795a998f86b8d3682ae3b1
c596fbf1e264fd230898cbfa005c5bd7cfe8fded
63039 F20101111_AAAYVM mcclister_d_Page_080.pro
4f1f51eb9faf482b0f0f1204b2f5b125
0fbc393e20871def1df2b5fe3e4e0dca0ab71170
27436 F20101111_AAAXLI mcclister_d_Page_049.QC.jpg
15579d927558dd9e5bef238bce550189
72d624b2f79dfd3d8ad50a553a2abc1b954061dc
96752 F20101111_AAAYIB mcclister_d_Page_262.jpg
c5eb9841718be0cfc064b4fe6b37bcaf
e4f0a364f2b3b64151c4cfaf687025aaf1067cc9
6652 F20101111_AAAZSG mcclister_d_Page_263thm.jpg
c58e9b5513ba775a534d949826e102ff
ef176adefdfded8de1c1352a8958db203e3d9146
5950 F20101111_AAAXYU mcclister_d_Page_078thm.jpg
1830180550b7409b0582f8b64a212631
9fe0b099986c1d0dafc6b4172ca2180658b8978f
53085 F20101111_AAAYVN mcclister_d_Page_081.pro
19fa453e7365800c54837fb049a9dd69
38e9f2aef78c71df144a7f0319f66555eb2558a8
2524 F20101111_AAAXLJ mcclister_d_Page_288.txt
e83925a6c85313edf5cf9c72c1b7fc21
4037a25fc5dc3aaffec9676c1bcc68cb77b4d5ed
101086 F20101111_AAAYIC mcclister_d_Page_263.jpg
800aaead82c99ce1fcfc8d6ec61b75a5
7e4343c8a8983d58a79fcf03856f2fa94da52075
27899 F20101111_AAAZSH mcclister_d_Page_265.QC.jpg
278b418434ebf0661a496eb3bec420d7
2282fd37c959e854b3200b8ed90f0cbfbe5a70ed
131915 F20101111_AAAXYV mcclister_d_Page_095.jp2
3d9f10bedbdcae49261dd0b006424903
c17286edc6fb680bccdd572bedbe66dae49e8076
54240 F20101111_AAAYVO mcclister_d_Page_082.pro
cd553fbee3de8b63cb4b74d42baeba17
aa5552ac5f24c8710d22fa7a1fcc08d858cd2c20
2176 F20101111_AAAXLK mcclister_d_Page_157.txt
2cd6e559ba2577d77ba6954b15217020
1f0e0943377aa805faa9b53c680fc0c2d310aecd
96848 F20101111_AAAYID mcclister_d_Page_266.jpg
97d969d2e7832d7d735269aaaed0703d
ab686ac68123c2d6702a1df249f8f3bed90f629a
28258 F20101111_AAAZSI mcclister_d_Page_268.QC.jpg
4987263b8863b891049e2a08608fb1cc
807d85581c060515bb294df19df757a027caddbd
1053954 F20101111_AAAXYW mcclister_d_Page_154.tif
6ff2c850315dc51fe9f48d4a3d29d188
d7b399b4366a3fe9b86d9a6966f5b7ae5d4deace
59069 F20101111_AAAYVP mcclister_d_Page_084.pro
4e5bc427f6d81859312252b53aa90fc1
6d314f88c2ff05e53b9d1f379bbdb993c38e7b8c
54210 F20101111_AAAXLL mcclister_d_Page_221.pro
e8d23356bcc6d9d5412f0d8652afe900
5baca55773b0925c589cd5a911999523f088c53f
91300 F20101111_AAAYIE mcclister_d_Page_268.jpg
367eb8409854424155803dd32359cd79
b1104d4e12e41040fa3d4aabab8427c2a7bbe628
28761 F20101111_AAAZSJ mcclister_d_Page_269.QC.jpg
b169c10367e031cd7a6a959741871230
b549ab02249d011f2122d41d692113634d31e2ef
2267 F20101111_AAAXYX mcclister_d_Page_149.txt
99b5b0e051b3d75ad32bd422674ed14f
a27414cb7e1ae02ce338fe7feaf689ff1599071e
59559 F20101111_AAAYVQ mcclister_d_Page_085.pro
40f8fa92e460c24077986980e3fa0a58
27027e1f082331e6cf8e1fbbee7dd2fc1bc48752
F20101111_AAAXLM mcclister_d_Page_280.tif
031160d1f0e808d9baa2d6ea5c86b8c8
32ad041ab241d63333ecd22cd4d4ed24abd126b3
92813 F20101111_AAAYIF mcclister_d_Page_269.jpg
bea51e968d6ffa8853988848adc50da2
0117c7d9991201f9a1b8f48cc089ac474af8bcfb
6759 F20101111_AAAZSK mcclister_d_Page_272thm.jpg
5f417b556b761db1413144c234a26e25
d7f6bc242381e68436c189832a197689054c43fa
118950 F20101111_AAAXYY mcclister_d_Page_051.jp2
093c1d658a925a14614d9fb2af19ac03
e8558e35c3e7d3938c8abef9c74d45bcddc26819
56547 F20101111_AAAYVR mcclister_d_Page_086.pro
598d94da880db04905166e162d6ec121
c4d16b7b6926044dcfb066c0f772e49dc349b6c3
48699 F20101111_AAAXLN mcclister_d_Page_248.pro
0d15d551b4f8f8871f9a323645d7a826
777fea986b11f5a23ff25d7bdd6603b298801249
91808 F20101111_AAAYIG mcclister_d_Page_271.jpg
3b4cd79fede860c29f878fbcd04f61e6
2fd140f3d403f497a75e1835baad2e400e628562
27410 F20101111_AAAZSL mcclister_d_Page_276.QC.jpg
687d27b1e7550ed43a1c947b438ad34d
f71a967cbc421299e41c0c5c5eeb33d5f9921832
2237 F20101111_AAAZFA mcclister_d_Page_239.txt
19c7e4efa8a3661b09bb708851efd2a3
385e29ec0d8e5ddb454da7423d18cb8e6c00bca4
2303 F20101111_AAAXYZ mcclister_d_Page_009.txt
dbf3c765115ebf06ab95756837719a90
05fab429826c7e05fe67598feee9b001b72afa76
54730 F20101111_AAAYVS mcclister_d_Page_087.pro
bbf30b3a9240e42801afe8cf88ec2234
9c2c1af9b4df40e9ab5dfb3347b3a615e67b1017
2197 F20101111_AAAXLO mcclister_d_Page_089.txt
d6494af65e47798c23773f4be916b071
361e33ae0228697f67b6190b4191eff6bdcd5f2b
91681 F20101111_AAAYIH mcclister_d_Page_272.jpg
2e68fa379079e22a9b082bd93e1d29a3
a209a09dd2f82bf3032ebcec2bbfe4812e104c3a
22814 F20101111_AAAZSM mcclister_d_Page_278.QC.jpg
b7015fc6d825f9b683389660d32b97a0
e9c2180b577bf254948abbc6556b4b9986f7af44
F20101111_AAAZFB mcclister_d_Page_241.txt
b20626e2916fcae5653e481c5487df2c
e0121f4640f62bd7e91bd908ae4abefed8901379
55597 F20101111_AAAYVT mcclister_d_Page_088.pro
a28ad7fbe0d198d3ab353364ae345112
18e78c6acf67a2805e99bf35277fbe920a253a20
135385 F20101111_AAAXLP mcclister_d_Page_257.jp2
40206f19c1d976dac0fe7ef5b771896c
2362263a55e1b242fb2ef66bb756a1d4912c6c75
86584 F20101111_AAAYII mcclister_d_Page_275.jpg
daa32e9eb4d3a9891b7d5117a25fa9d5
a7612813ef0ec064b6dbf2e98cd1308c37b379ef
6919 F20101111_AAAZSN mcclister_d_Page_289thm.jpg
94b494fa895f5b9394e07ab0f356b985
a958e3afd700b9301a0323c47932f55be47b0b0a
2272 F20101111_AAAZFC mcclister_d_Page_242.txt
0879170b81bdf0bf411ceea4e91587c0
68002ae6ed9a21979fbe4919f4bec503e7ac0f9b
54282 F20101111_AAAYVU mcclister_d_Page_089.pro
02eab4b776d759e3f805e23a6b5f5422
82e27ac9699ab8e54c8a9f6ba452d5265c089b52
126953 F20101111_AAAXLQ mcclister_d_Page_176.jp2
a081cd22d30850b95c465cfe59893a9e
1295c0f50c55ecc14989864542176c9a33f0113d
72183 F20101111_AAAYIJ mcclister_d_Page_278.jpg
1ec77958c99e26d1a19b820a3399985a
f6a541d171550f8bb50e8730d97af6c91b8d36e0
29912 F20101111_AAAZSO mcclister_d_Page_291.QC.jpg
f347893c9bc6f7ca2643aa811227ee9d
492ce329bd531f44f563e70a91973d2a981cc86d
2131 F20101111_AAAZFD mcclister_d_Page_244.txt
f984ec937de866fccb725420ded8558f
392ce303ee54f52e7724f4a4fc9421e52dc64efd
44186 F20101111_AAAYVV mcclister_d_Page_092.pro
109ac5f3fd0b1030ce43cce54b08c49c
7c4d2abeba43ca83f7a882f716570b783d380097
65029 F20101111_AAAXLR mcclister_d_Page_070.pro
83e1987141604fa20e91ffa80b64fa26
a7e2fbdfb7bf50938134ca3758d8c7080413a459
105421 F20101111_AAAYIK mcclister_d_Page_280.jpg
6da3ee089882f30e23726f4320026aea
941096a621fa70978214b564c9bcaa6c1ca815e6
7160 F20101111_AAAZSP mcclister_d_Page_292thm.jpg
68893ddf549e9a743de9ca8db4535649
3af14aada0a46c5068ec305a30c81b91c4ece69e
2009 F20101111_AAAZFE mcclister_d_Page_246.txt
9dbd5b75ee913666a124f107a18b920d
98a618b5125a790b725729802c02ed231c6e6bc0
58483 F20101111_AAAYVW mcclister_d_Page_094.pro
1ca51682703fc94473f70a29dab28378
90af3f7c33c93976a2b41a492c2cc1c28486bd0e
63118 F20101111_AAAXLS mcclister_d_Page_292.pro
b856f1497df28d6c3075735e5451503f
f5256cfff529fb35fc857177d57faa5dc46cfa0f
96621 F20101111_AAAYIL mcclister_d_Page_281.jpg
50b99fc15d88f90b0ad26493ce3652dc
c8e459d9ed5049d0be3754a791da805588a3919e
26301 F20101111_AAAZSQ mcclister_d_Page_293.QC.jpg
1d4538c83062d42e26effd696063774e
66baca5c9a3c0ad3d7366eb2e1065f67971a91ab
2374 F20101111_AAAZFF mcclister_d_Page_247.txt
dcd983f1923c8890b11aa5d3130b8f63
aa10158c9abc32979d0fc02786083cae096674cf
58418 F20101111_AAAYVX mcclister_d_Page_096.pro
cbef75de2f72ca1b67601a92977f346d
8121bbded2dd6176278f13e75116cc497a3d2895
6658 F20101111_AAAXLT mcclister_d_Page_261thm.jpg
c4dd7ee77d713c2e6d369be824c0addc
94f08949768dd567d108a1b58c61f1d1e81e9b79
95370 F20101111_AAAYIM mcclister_d_Page_282.jpg
8b4a13e1fb112b4ae40e9cf7baec25ff
682f6fe70c72f8386fff7327af22d6b27dd8e361
29358 F20101111_AAAZSR mcclister_d_Page_295.QC.jpg
9c9285610442c148d5cbd29683359bcb
dc6aad173c4d7febe44b4121474023b253681b41
1987 F20101111_AAAZFG mcclister_d_Page_248.txt
742427a189e1fd63e67e702c63e9354d
e681ee68d6dd92dea8946b8777ba251eb68f5b41
75033 F20101111_AAAYVY mcclister_d_Page_098.pro
77374c36da9df15aa04a7609ebdc74cf
17f007b04d80823c3e713a8593bd4c57ab2fbbc1
F20101111_AAAXLU mcclister_d_Page_240.tif
50ffd121d9a3a9c5fb92694c4e7b1057
956207d859e2e8f5685c555c9de60329dd42e0ce
100537 F20101111_AAAYIN mcclister_d_Page_283.jpg
23545c161dde85c311f3e41cfdd7f35c
8684b742a442725a53dc886bde9ecc79a10f7558
1993 F20101111_AAAZFH mcclister_d_Page_249.txt
8b9f16e963e415f78578ccd3d6bbc219
72a1d816cb988fe48589cb2afe4daf8684aa9c2e
56486 F20101111_AAAYVZ mcclister_d_Page_099.pro
4ffda8a7c4c48d86708e1cbefe4fbd2f
8b9c15807491dd7ac004400d8bba99b22e5a41e0
F20101111_AAAXLV mcclister_d_Page_086.tif
0297f45d34c5bd7ac5cf4f686d3f655e
618a030eb8f48e5898b9d7de02aa69f9bb2923e7
90551 F20101111_AAAYIO mcclister_d_Page_284.jpg
2d044dcd0cd9e5e87e4bc02a777928d0
9be8b6bedc5a30e8ebcb83ba00e191d79c487597
2001 F20101111_AAAZFI mcclister_d_Page_251.txt
735fa61bc195358ee67a38582db86d7e
7540c3144e4a63ae45013f534b00b12220419fdc
2566 F20101111_AAAXLW mcclister_d_Page_292.txt
4dde3e38955f327192f5dc78e7cb33c3
64073fcc0c9ef758e43bc43825b4e9034fe03ed4
94102 F20101111_AAAYIP mcclister_d_Page_285.jpg
cee4f4cc8fd66bd596cd26f375626bc6
c470def094b1ff32ec896f7b49262978de6c55d5
2569 F20101111_AAAZFJ mcclister_d_Page_252.txt
7d7a952feec77ff9678a537acf701473
1a01327539055b727e3adb7c8738ba0fb2c6aff1
2162 F20101111_AAAXLX mcclister_d_Page_265.txt
4c375ac6ced33524ac01f0dd32d1c8a3
b6af17fb7c968239b4c900e702eb0222a02c584c
106146 F20101111_AAAYIQ mcclister_d_Page_289.jpg
7f0ed6830801c5b12e9d5e24e5f13133
f4f1385d3d78c025c43a26dc72d0475c7312a2bf
2181 F20101111_AAAZFK mcclister_d_Page_254.txt
24e3777d600dec900d22667d86bcb5ca
52ff571920644b70b75590a00e7a653db79aec0c
103049 F20101111_AAAYIR mcclister_d_Page_292.jpg
c742b48454c971eeb6979ae21f5a19c1
8b753794f8f4a37082206fc0ae15dc4b3a505710
2527 F20101111_AAAZFL mcclister_d_Page_255.txt
d7c81745a74ced98bb8f6cbebaae6044
30ebda20f50f455070c428767197ae3cfa292294
95344 F20101111_AAAXLY mcclister_d_Page_140.jpg
a8f22145aa362478974698a192d451ca
c66fc059e16b6f92f2267265890bfa28b3408ac4
95553 F20101111_AAAYIS mcclister_d_Page_294.jpg
273ac49911f5e45bcbbe595872441d88
7177a817c41f0ee1aecd7a0219ee78626f849658
2213 F20101111_AAAZFM mcclister_d_Page_256.txt
6105f31decbb53df095a375ac6b06045
5bf09ad8f719e822ca04ee34fed848fc46736df1
129650 F20101111_AAAXLZ mcclister_d_Page_209.jp2
177c3c94ca5a78df950c14c9ea83fa9a
f6fa4cc89aebd541c06f8c4d8756236097191b8d
98606 F20101111_AAAYIT mcclister_d_Page_295.jpg
20fa8701917266ad16300bfbd1e1431b
ee0a6b89b795feafd8f8347538691697acd4eae7
2720 F20101111_AAAZFN mcclister_d_Page_257.txt
30e94672ad8a8098f087725459cf877d
f7dec703d3f0aff1ecc6df167b078d6b30c95fd1
1513 F20101111_AAAWUA mcclister_d_Page_267thm.jpg
6ad14eee99dca20cba760c988b7aa181
23cd92967b44bc18a7f7f036364466ab1bee20a1
2277 F20101111_AAAZFO mcclister_d_Page_259.txt
a177f5e739031d733a6ffcee73dbceae
ea58588b95b8b741aabc9d10d1bb300938690c55
31896 F20101111_AAAWUB mcclister_d_Page_055.QC.jpg
1dfca51bad7ba4a3a76c919756f4d339
5d91af57de61b9fb0b4c231ecba45d05ab7863b4
63243 F20101111_AAAYIU mcclister_d_Page_297.jpg
d6065b7bb5df95c99c8f4a803b8f758f
1dbb5cb7a339780c5fb277c3dc2d29d257eaba76
2228 F20101111_AAAZFP mcclister_d_Page_261.txt
a496c3ad7599b6c907e149f14ec30f0a
847edfad9c1713b962e8a51589d39be538a6bac0
21312 F20101111_AAAYIV mcclister_d_Page_001.jp2
da5bb3d6fa54b8cc6dc359fdb52a929b
fae79d2cea924a3e549f88a312e30f08f6d7d1ca
92442 F20101111_AAAWUC mcclister_d_Page_233.jpg
8d700df45cf5cd3bbfec5e7e05bc8a70
c0dead574fc0e044479e56a25bf306efcb3d33bd
63477 F20101111_AAAYIW mcclister_d_Page_004.jp2
fc334a9a3f7e76393fb24e498a47462e
adccf6f008a0662b7555a300486b72f348a0a513
2521 F20101111_AAAZFQ mcclister_d_Page_263.txt
5bc885b9c12bf86b1aaa01ed366278ea
2fe4b466514f9d1d8f5e111f465b18dda339f39b
27298 F20101111_AAAWUD mcclister_d_Page_181.QC.jpg
e6aeb6d2a34156ce9a92a2a9bd961799
53993a5439a92db5df9db0c945ac7767d9e904de
1051976 F20101111_AAAYIX mcclister_d_Page_005.jp2
04e9dbfef767a10df411e3d7c71c405a
d8a77a64bbab18d91c671eae901da7abbb7a02fd
2345 F20101111_AAAZFR mcclister_d_Page_264.txt
d41eb7e474b43fad3c202c648741b754
abac080dd5f795c38801f45c70e930ca4c66a376
F20101111_AAAWUE mcclister_d_Page_173.tif
8cf5f04f392d5d9380b33b34c519ad0c
ce8baa6e42777ead7464935d62ced5a9fcbfe5c9
117619 F20101111_AAAYIY mcclister_d_Page_009.jp2
5fb05e1e5afd16817702e8434854ecc9
b898b5e2f0d1daf8d398d62e7732031af876f3c8
2317 F20101111_AAAZFS mcclister_d_Page_266.txt
de4caf5b1147bf4b0303c83331187f52
531fa456ded159ec8564bf749cb783c44b6fd094
112941 F20101111_AAAWUF mcclister_d_Page_121.jp2
a98a8128fea9b5bc1fba42b97a61b41b
a00df431adab63fe5939e9fbe23c05d401510bdc
160635 F20101111_AAAYIZ mcclister_d_Page_010.jp2
e3124ea1ac3869b400ab3e1ab69b394b
f200bc41b0864761e784bdacafca311b039dd548
2221 F20101111_AAAZFT mcclister_d_Page_268.txt
71ac7f17d18b671d05ec79de25591758
9a172dbf5db9a358c2ecf1581379adf18ba36278
F20101111_AAAWUG mcclister_d_Page_265.tif
4560a49ceb05431adfc235afd1049066
ee7015766f86e8237b4998d4ef7a6a1d13ceab47
2261 F20101111_AAAZFU mcclister_d_Page_273.txt
b4609c72983020a8902bc12f4e2cff37
817c7b5d13f602b4a9f819ad209f1531344d75c2
135885 F20101111_AAAWUH mcclister_d_Page_020.jp2
d79f03fdd2cdada20485850fcb5bace7
6c54b635c70f235f2a11feda872d88e8b05a6561
2143 F20101111_AAAXRA mcclister_d_Page_270.txt
ad63e2aaaf3a9987457b00dc57f0c130
7f695c3cc4cdca7ccdc98d0143fa04f49983ff80
2160 F20101111_AAAZFV mcclister_d_Page_274.txt
a55fe2c87a14c7383b30400ce5a470c0
12d036aef32be6cf587d24e082cc1459911d98a6
73751 F20101111_AAAWUI mcclister_d_Page_008.jpg
3335a48b77912fa655f6d60288f892d5
ab3aabc8ac89241106e27088492d51939bbf5148
90320 F20101111_AAAXRB mcclister_d_Page_270.jpg
0937613c0141b5ef165b39f85a7615b0
91d20d27e7f2417ac60cf8e4fb7b8212c29daf1e
2110 F20101111_AAAZFW mcclister_d_Page_275.txt
d2a118319f289116b25f423614099c14
e6205c925ddc3e88c932c40fe8f44e868e2ae687
F20101111_AAAWUJ mcclister_d_Page_062.tif
b265be465930ea686de1e5cd62ed9d32
a8044b87a3245ffeffd8fa5f19e58d55d4eb5df9
6413 F20101111_AAAXRC mcclister_d_Page_229thm.jpg
b540c716aeb6a62d2d7cdc61a8c188d0
b58845166ea3cea4e64dac518c0103c1531dd291
2210 F20101111_AAAZFX mcclister_d_Page_277.txt
f476ced0ed659d4c220d6f96f5363214
7356bc52c06b613b5ea4d82355018e75c7236e8e
2394 F20101111_AAAWUK mcclister_d_Page_139.txt
a606838f2b338ea0180fedbededb666c
4a69e4dc493f5b9dfaad12828007dcf3235f97de
27905 F20101111_AAAXRD mcclister_d_Page_169.QC.jpg
7542b57becbc4c4f5c6312e18d1353dd
37fe1a7cc20951a72c05d37058bbe149ee6f60a0
1757 F20101111_AAAZFY mcclister_d_Page_278.txt
a106c2099f3d900c263414682eb8f78c
2f20bebbc4041931c8da40e8c832a4f0a623eb14
6252 F20101111_AAAWUL mcclister_d_Page_068thm.jpg
aa19ac5cbf304373c90de207dbd4563a
9a5289979eb4ee3ff99287a587d66827ce03c859
2217 F20101111_AAAXRE mcclister_d_Page_271.txt
228f2fd5b918dce485d19bef972981cd
8c8ca5837256122d6d8f1ce136d9dceae80d41d8
2360 F20101111_AAAZFZ mcclister_d_Page_279.txt
8e984719239b15c9cf51356dee515905
c97474c84732a48ce7884890de7df5b6322473cc
27673 F20101111_AAAWUM mcclister_d_Page_122.QC.jpg
b3bcf9b22eb34c618b197231526b0385
0b3350052b132ce517c48c7e5b55b3f01c453eae
59715 F20101111_AAAXRF mcclister_d_Page_091.pro
267a558b2a5fd160528f6a36114e92a2
e8df119d8bd7a38b750f10cf4fbf1312c3fde981
111118 F20101111_AAAWUN mcclister_d_Page_205.jp2
247ad21f2c9a5f587bd81f992a8e0f42
ffdac19c401ec24242e42f35ea1bd07908f2cfea
897659 F20101111_AAAXRG mcclister_d_Page_006.jp2
ff515881fd51c24328d9c548140f8bf1
28d01b70792cb43abe665d1d5dab7fa17bd6a2f4
56822 F20101111_AAAWUO mcclister_d_Page_016.pro
83b4d8c9f898cd1e4c9fad55477826a4
58f4a9db0bdab4badaabd9ebbc9c1d6046733c85
2536 F20101111_AAAXRH mcclister_d_Page_107.txt
ca8017bbbcb4859e617c406187fb855e
66e2d63c3934cb2d211791a2ee679f32a9b2c34e
1051956 F20101111_AAAYOA mcclister_d_Page_288.jp2
9ab9fce8dcb6e4bbddf62db1c19dd372
cdaf01cd5f45d041a20c65984d0ec9602afbb3c7
6453 F20101111_AAAWUP mcclister_d_Page_293thm.jpg
316d1e36866c53847f47a2c2d4efced8
61cc1a8191599c4a6b2c8ca53fa28aec0742ecc9
139250 F20101111_AAAXRI mcclister_d_Page_175.jp2
8f8eb90891cac1ef1b6d9784ed28bc18
4b4760afd8a9e9c36c342ba1a7d31f5846ea159a
138970 F20101111_AAAYOB mcclister_d_Page_289.jp2
989d2d385f9bc6bc13d21b44c5a6090f
459489d07e9c9008a828c978c1ae6f692c16752a
93173 F20101111_AAAWUQ mcclister_d_Page_207.jpg
adb86028b6de956a486eec47e21833a2
af7ddf2e89dfa69676c6071e8b9c44cc4fab5771
F20101111_AAAXRJ mcclister_d_Page_014.tif
61e9c32cb7fbd3712dab02e0f32c7a85
c1694e275d3ae84f7d21979efe803a1649533a2c
115214 F20101111_AAAYOC mcclister_d_Page_293.jp2
e6fe9765f9081ff25a65eab6eebb9c87
ccadeb4fcae1ac3a6bccf6e3efc019b55d4f3586
27526 F20101111_AAAWUR mcclister_d_Page_056.QC.jpg
a46d6b929b02c335d99d55a7aa910400
2ff17facbbe0fc4c2ce2ecb8f5ef2e90669aeea0
25271604 F20101111_AAAXRK mcclister_d_Page_006.tif
c16cd5172b9cd88cb30ccd36d936c0e7
a3fd0a53d456f348c3b3513400d1707c0190c1e6
129135 F20101111_AAAYOD mcclister_d_Page_294.jp2
6c8da8073b656345611f5d0e17078945
8f09db31e964a273c4b73a6eb2c5cdd75550aa16
28868 F20101111_AAAWUS mcclister_d_Page_077.QC.jpg
8e23d8d0584847e149688ae904ff158d
4f3a726a5c93b949bcc4dff9b59f28645bf6e5e0
6754 F20101111_AAAXRL mcclister_d_Page_101thm.jpg
5408f5f9583eba3f7d424de44b4e6869
9cc5724682a8ed31720b6e03399e36ae5a1fcb88
130089 F20101111_AAAYOE mcclister_d_Page_295.jp2
ae7303d15d1ae59e7b6e33a9fcebe511
f05edddf6639060d27bef0f44cf47f61306fa21f
2327 F20101111_AAAXEA mcclister_d_Page_211.txt
aeb65a4acc0eb8cf412b6efedc5f8215
109754970fa26b8364ec2b7a4843c4ceebb6de12
31157 F20101111_AAAWUT mcclister_d_Page_027.QC.jpg
0080690b28479916b21c865a2ae96638
87ba2ddcef0acc4358f386abe92d604169c4b42b
F20101111_AAAXRM mcclister_d_Page_278.tif
501d4a7aca6fb69f20dc9a7d503dadf1
c35dfe90213bed6bb5b3bfd5a0835ae5e2648b06
50510 F20101111_AAAYOF mcclister_d_Page_296.jp2
0da06aa2bb98a86259b4ffa3348001cc
963356c1ebb4c898817988cbd2edc830a3981090
2314 F20101111_AAAXEB mcclister_d_Page_042.txt
207cc173a0fa17f415f19e4e56c6def5
95b32dc8756a208c43c178cf94f47131f26ad1b8
23663 F20101111_AAAWUU mcclister_d_Page_092.QC.jpg
c73a8e90af0c571b3d4de37c67558752
059d8c92ceb51ee054b35888c66c068c2245f94e
94994 F20101111_AAAXRN mcclister_d_Page_011.jpg
67107749b83b247dd6f197d4a1b23ccd
f80280a5cc5529c69539df180b8f3af801a4918a
F20101111_AAAYOG mcclister_d_Page_002.tif
e746fecddb0da1b5eb3be64d1ce37ea6
769704f12f9e1b127a7b641000cc5156e0e5a176
105736 F20101111_AAAXEC mcclister_d_Page_248.jp2
59716b08bc99e597b3f73bc44f784949
f7b42b192dbd1f1da128dfd37e1b1a2208900551
6373 F20101111_AAAZLA mcclister_d_Page_061thm.jpg
cfa101fa236df243623396d9ef9c2390
0b4d9ab374c720b79fea5707062ce5ced6a21673
6846 F20101111_AAAWUV mcclister_d_Page_253thm.jpg
ad6eb3e09efd73b9f2f34605e0994290
77582c9d78e6ee888a19e9a8b3e3a74634b66b58
2152 F20101111_AAAXRO mcclister_d_Page_056.txt
fbdc5f20ab4ed56f949b6e7ac442c7e6
2bc28e4b167343bd67230af075b6512a678fa2f8
F20101111_AAAYOH mcclister_d_Page_005.tif
ebe2414dc8d86b2d1590e1fec518bd25
1a87a89efc22f68b614ee9f682a7db4159e32f81
6587 F20101111_AAAXED mcclister_d_Page_089thm.jpg
9b49a76127649eb3d144a3396b4fcadd
6f828ca98e62bb976202567024f5efdeb859076e
6570 F20101111_AAAZLB mcclister_d_Page_171thm.jpg
101ab52b6fde7016e1dec36f9e9a941d
df22fcea87f12b047ff0c2b03775926e53e18f60
6719 F20101111_AAAWUW mcclister_d_Page_140thm.jpg
85e91ecb4edb3eef7980c0ee2748a169
f7192877d874be716d6a4ce89059319de2e89859
25769 F20101111_AAAXRP mcclister_d_Page_083.QC.jpg
c966ccc060876ae5cdd2690d93558752
f3d12a3e338596a874d4a2d84538e6e7cdb0c3e4
F20101111_AAAYOI mcclister_d_Page_007.tif
4bd0599f91b74005612082697da6bc07
22f8dcfb4f967417e418a0c271cbd477c4e0e4b7
123247 F20101111_AAAXEE mcclister_d_Page_196.jp2
9d0311da2ddcdca31eade70149318c8e
9734cff179f51eadc42892b1d93a1625e026c531
31721 F20101111_AAAZLC mcclister_d_Page_023.QC.jpg
eb2fc3bd90548d23c85dc8352eacea21
f9e56d38069969c7f55154ad66c6e1b7f8ba8ba2
F20101111_AAAWUX mcclister_d_Page_171.tif
27248a8729a5ac823004e4965dade132
2719c06b93e505efc85184cab0653331c8d08623
F20101111_AAAXRQ mcclister_d_Page_088.txt
00d6502f7ba649b7b1fe34ae41e868e5
9aacdb5ef722ec19e04a26d2e54780364b2ff38c
F20101111_AAAYOJ mcclister_d_Page_008.tif
b0a90631cb14945e172edc8a8e272a22
cd26264690f8d08255b5752d6860ff7dde299320
125345 F20101111_AAAXEF mcclister_d_Page_128.jp2
3710b4dde90bbfdb814287e4b913ae5c
67bfa5fca3485ce478866889a97b6abf0d7e33d6
6537 F20101111_AAAZLD mcclister_d_Page_228thm.jpg
bcfd8326e01cda1e71025b9099c75b02
ca5c37bb1e7b11c030fd474f624f931452649146
92884 F20101111_AAAWUY mcclister_d_Page_099.jpg
01188cb0908d578f5cdce88a0be88f74
c391ebe655135e68ddb3eac60696fe28c862463c
49581 F20101111_AAAXRR mcclister_d_Page_004.jpg
08099d39113a9fd7d5af89d7f73e27e8
0776acaa9d6955ff6b9543db7d705538b133b505
F20101111_AAAYOK mcclister_d_Page_010.tif
83202779b823965a4ead9f97c27c7d78
de7cac65c6696cc7175209f03723e99f3e9278f2
117443 F20101111_AAAXEG mcclister_d_Page_239.jp2
06ec5cacf698176ae9cf786c849b1dd6
def5db5b4302347737ce399506685130851bf0a2
30059 F20101111_AAAZLE mcclister_d_Page_065.QC.jpg
395987803639881b1621ae9b634ac742
45e34a1582bc0994847b32cf2fd4b4d1271a47ae
6637 F20101111_AAAWUZ mcclister_d_Page_123thm.jpg
f8ea1afc0bbafef3e0416121d2a73404
866e74246cd52479ed04f154fb6f5bdbf9014a85
29210 F20101111_AAAYBA mcclister_d_Page_243.QC.jpg
32b1cdecab5485b4429d3fdaa848e578
4d8471371a978c3883599a979170d85e66c635a6
6638 F20101111_AAAXRS mcclister_d_Page_244thm.jpg
e5d50b53b6a8d7f0168e08c7a07046ef
d673cd3e98697ca3bc89b9150edae966a7a31bce
F20101111_AAAYOL mcclister_d_Page_012.tif
fffcbe6a541e3b682f3c98d66f1ffe48
c5de64314ea08ab00d0951b585fc6229ef10b2c5
1051967 F20101111_AAAXEH mcclister_d_Page_042.jp2
79f33f534897d901be1876d12e7d6f10
0bc720a17dd60d67dbf0a1edc80cc63738191665
7268 F20101111_AAAZLF mcclister_d_Page_055thm.jpg
72d0010ced6c8b681f412e647ddf2c3a
f1fb4e7db15f0ae331819fb2cea10f5e084ab03e
6792 F20101111_AAAYBB mcclister_d_Page_218thm.jpg
c4a017b15a3a2d01f22a59121ff6f285
38c512595927a549183abde928e7d46e14760725
64103 F20101111_AAAXRT mcclister_d_Page_238.jpg
c3dfa0be386d2354bd4c44b38a3332fb
21798c8bd6e94ee7a95679cd6059a6a1678a233b
F20101111_AAAYOM mcclister_d_Page_019.tif
c9dfd39f4d64a2845549c879235e8802
93f2152ef8dc52784c4549795332ac738b8ff775
6560 F20101111_AAAXEI mcclister_d_Page_225thm.jpg
8f5d8d8b5bac1f7426d408d0300abfeb
b11a03dd7d8c349fc9eca5ae35f12e7b658e3bed
6868 F20101111_AAAZLG mcclister_d_Page_294thm.jpg
fc71a74f66b6a0f74e5c21d6be7479d1
55300aae4366a64eca1a60a805869d096218b4df
2296 F20101111_AAAYBC mcclister_d_Page_110.txt
6efec95a0cf93d5cef150acf969668b5
817b58e076ef3502e64db13d337f0a0e20528657
123390 F20101111_AAAXRU mcclister_d_Page_084.jp2
e5f6c38633c3cb3bcda73f7f7386f48a
5d90662732ecb73cb8bdfc8c93e673994b9796e9
F20101111_AAAYON mcclister_d_Page_020.tif
cd8d52897a122684f7ed03ee1e6cbcfa
1b62b61127eef294b563ab2115d1fb6cc21755a2
90841 F20101111_AAAXEJ mcclister_d_Page_102.jpg
6044f931e3e3f9b2410c5f73de555d81
f7801b11907988593395c4013f39c053aed50e5e
28093 F20101111_AAAZLH mcclister_d_Page_087.QC.jpg
122bd80fa05543d141005448d4d62e9c
f68e339cc57cbf89575a41e9fb000ce691bf87e7
F20101111_AAAYBD mcclister_d_Page_164.tif
d46b872d62ebed687aaef18dbec43b29
b4798b92ea4cc04d4d7ed32340841c877d77e5d9
F20101111_AAAXRV mcclister_d_Page_244.tif
cd4442b6f3b2ab92f51e1e7562ee16d4
4f67ea84df183a34958263f46c92b505f9a9d676
F20101111_AAAYOO mcclister_d_Page_021.tif
4fd4f302485d95b2f2268ea949510311
cdb2f034761626659450537750c183739ce44f8e
95420 F20101111_AAAXEK mcclister_d_Page_008.jp2
968941a5cda41e25c3eefe965b692ceb
af3f96c3a892d379f97a020060848a512fbe3a47
6234 F20101111_AAAZLI mcclister_d_Page_136thm.jpg
149e86cefc909d145b8ebfbfc3b30dc2
d6a5524d1cd7ec5c2aa209bbe935ac20d705f663
90765 F20101111_AAAYBE mcclister_d_Page_005.jpg
5ec9af6b40411431190687d80f6054be
d1b73b5aeeace5c76a73b0b3b937cf1de7b8368a
28602 F20101111_AAAXRW mcclister_d_Page_071.QC.jpg
6e6ef0bad473ef5f65eb1ebd24a098de
3088fc7ea8f9916c6b6454bab824e0ba7c5a13ec
F20101111_AAAYOP mcclister_d_Page_024.tif
0a8a7e4d363caa64d58a3c9385c770bb
e018da6ef3b7d48e59374da1de2438820fc9d46d
27104 F20101111_AAAXEL mcclister_d_Page_114.QC.jpg
a6b6944abc33c7814f75c4296dc8ef4b
34941563f21528f19d331a07efbe0e7d0318228e
6253 F20101111_AAAZLJ mcclister_d_Page_133thm.jpg
5b1af390b8eb160d151b3584d70ed521
edeb5abe4a669022bc532086b585a3bf6410e0b0
6561 F20101111_AAAYBF mcclister_d_Page_080thm.jpg
346be29a94201a9b25dda33cb5bc3edc
712ea19cd4cda0d0f846ab8ae5dd7f04266eb13a
6822 F20101111_AAAXRX mcclister_d_Page_163thm.jpg
8f291bcd8f1610450437cf74836ca728
bb4ec5fe1389497813b936bdd9e7031377823b0e
F20101111_AAAYOQ mcclister_d_Page_029.tif
3d187fc4a5643692cb65c8f171c22a88
fe8cca65db9b5c2a1d60ed949dd3d8ca05c36350
121667 F20101111_AAAXEM mcclister_d_Page_214.jp2
e4073be1a50f0fbb846fcd5269349376
9ac27087808e11b8632963ac9e636a88e32e1307
6961 F20101111_AAAZLK mcclister_d_Page_095thm.jpg
7b2c35702806b8fbabb35c7636e414ac
56f561ffa459c1300a2b21bab34d7d8ec2189c2d
F20101111_AAAYBG mcclister_d_Page_046.tif
13732075ba4adb73fc5bf4945530b71c
1494aa16f3a4e26f9599c23b24dcd228778c5224
F20101111_AAAXRY mcclister_d_Page_078.tif
e94bec32c9225a800f777fea9646e55b
8acbd3c4bb5a27578f85ceda2c0c4d6fe4d140c7
F20101111_AAAYOR mcclister_d_Page_031.tif
e512db6ce5672442911beeb13b35c776
40fc683adf16a34024591cb8be34b9d66e7a0888
28428 F20101111_AAAXEN mcclister_d_Page_074.QC.jpg
5b69aa5d5577c7b4d76ae1f6e51b10b7
0f74dcb1cf386ceed272eaccd399738b8308a733
6489 F20101111_AAAZLL mcclister_d_Page_057thm.jpg
ca8c66612ee0f4cfb4b003f1789cd652
cdd34c65c1cfb0ea76eeb6a252dcc359b80e3e58
2202 F20101111_AAAYBH mcclister_d_Page_233.txt
45f4d274bbf571451c59416a19812f97
d4b24e93d0e570e1c832d77aa774d913d29d8349
56341 F20101111_AAAXRZ mcclister_d_Page_169.pro
1a1b330216dea682c670ea5351e68900
73ba0baa8204eef2da24eb7c56558cd7f8052437
F20101111_AAAYOS mcclister_d_Page_038.tif
9f34d54c1ea87fb3357cf0e3e2f01ab7
fef0040a3a1750f15103f32092cae652ab95d72c
F20101111_AAAXEO mcclister_d_Page_245.tif
01a07aed6d43f8c46d69ef20e0d3f6a0
d8f0c19bf676f66976ad62ec0e473f173b87b4bb
6521 F20101111_AAAZLM mcclister_d_Page_227thm.jpg
dfb79b166400c25ef55f67a4d0415d1d
3a19240b61a13ebb047303b4461d50887b28793b
57508 F20101111_AAAYBI mcclister_d_Page_150.pro
35f7fc0f3837f245cda3da47508922a3
32494b8f728c4f93bd22711fa11dad7506bb1665
F20101111_AAAYOT mcclister_d_Page_039.tif
0f1069cb670e6156b94211d57f83a39f
603f79ab345638f1f402a5a02a5cdc6cd28fe55a
28900 F20101111_AAAXEP mcclister_d_Page_094.QC.jpg
59bc0f7b861d05867ce9a99b0a4ceda0
b779de7979766f3ee07768bd32fb0e0935dead57
28549 F20101111_AAAZLN mcclister_d_Page_118.QC.jpg
dc51d60c78e2fb3d7b323f71077c470d
125d778d6e9ec8ac4ee30f8eec207828cf6d9f57
85729 F20101111_AAAYBJ mcclister_d_Page_159.jpg
ce5542122f3b410a965a369fc5e7bf26
934201fc4cc463e977b2022fddbaa1cd4d97df42
F20101111_AAAYOU mcclister_d_Page_040.tif
4c04cd50686f65b259715b6ba07b2132
b9eee201d607fefd52c97e4d69e870f5ceb46e92
6526 F20101111_AAAXEQ mcclister_d_Page_118thm.jpg
3880355dd382e67b4b0863cbc7a6b1f6
80e1bdb27c58841ca341e2185acaf808d9d00653
24271 F20101111_AAAZLO mcclister_d_Page_153.QC.jpg
5959e89c71f9a7b94b5675024b499551
6570529bcc6185bc8b79802ef7cc7aaf1f8b9645
2105 F20101111_AAAYBK mcclister_d_Page_155.txt
e3f6fcae1dd8ce09565946aabacb6b61
97851168e45eaaf5d2c80b80e4afe76aea220c1a
F20101111_AAAYOV mcclister_d_Page_041.tif
9dd5d405cf1304adece0c60f93b440c0
95b9400586b8170d3d424a2f59b7c205b87f36e9
30054 F20101111_AAAZLP mcclister_d_Page_015.QC.jpg
31872e799f70bdac34be911ce82742b9
08e8d91068ffcdcfcd4b38f424795b6161ed8f9d
61623 F20101111_AAAYBL mcclister_d_Page_031.pro
bc7d7b87e3f5639891ccab0a4ea28a82
dd4c0aef8100a4cf662b0944bdde155cef829fee
F20101111_AAAYOW mcclister_d_Page_044.tif
302eb7cfed846f5c2ef6cf3372b3a4ec
ae742e4acb5de296dea9617fc306b19b4dc43aef
6912 F20101111_AAAXER mcclister_d_Page_269thm.jpg
23b2145a68386d9756fe14698f03f0e0
83fc99bce52381754415aa2f86477080619125fb
6601 F20101111_AAAZLQ mcclister_d_Page_237thm.jpg
a4668971c926bb6e1da6e3d407e32390
09196f66b1032356f766edff2c0e917705473c6d
F20101111_AAAYBM mcclister_d_Page_209.tif
a23cbe800021199f031c6d4ac650dbff
b36e90704aafcea4e77ac6ecbb307a421460206a
F20101111_AAAYOX mcclister_d_Page_047.tif
a101b91625d2e5733d2ab66d58aef7e5
e8b1ff3028236e3155fca9c04fc7b09b7a50ca5b
68687 F20101111_AAAXES mcclister_d_Page_105.pro
a42d93138dc5dfafb371447beea0fffb
a5aa073a29b2d1964ed8e943145653c149d1988f
6359 F20101111_AAAZLR mcclister_d_Page_156thm.jpg
0e94a34d27ecba65223aa07450fc0438
ca65db1d9c9271bfb1c64527a46fd22f7d514a19
F20101111_AAAYOY mcclister_d_Page_051.tif
a4aa74600a7b3412e5bbdb13a8463747
a7de6d332127c9fd005584676c3b5ba8b87de49f
115685 F20101111_AAAXET mcclister_d_Page_082.jp2
c7ccc848f9c11eedcb511b6af4a8c066
65951736dddef30c10003834d597593b01658eec
6884 F20101111_AAAZLS mcclister_d_Page_254thm.jpg
eeda3b5a2356440be8484d775389e3a3
f3b0326cda435123177e028495afb4e062a08a00
F20101111_AAAYBN mcclister_d_Page_003.tif
f3da4aba4ab7346298e727dafaf70e25
abd92a9cd167f55164cc8603999b03ea87bf7f60
F20101111_AAAYOZ mcclister_d_Page_052.tif
00867556c3c8b442fc29abcd90795367
ea4bc07cab3c4a294d1255c6d3eb41921dd4bd5d
1979 F20101111_AAAXEU mcclister_d_Page_045.txt
6fb954075f896d2400381ac58fa879f5
f4937e062e8d5c68211c256566356b0e5dd7438d
5973 F20101111_AAAZLT mcclister_d_Page_187thm.jpg
7d8283e7b673e66576f66add4741d8d8
a867e7db725a443642112df0573d92bcf87ae108
88101 F20101111_AAAYBO mcclister_d_Page_063.jpg
f2adefd549c7ff0442cde30fffca9d8c
87a08786e903fb7ee1b8f154d6b471eba84450aa
6738 F20101111_AAAXEV mcclister_d_Page_235thm.jpg
debe9801dd7bfcba0740aedb172f0a02
7f30ab214cff3e6ae27f5ee216e688c25da6ad35
28458 F20101111_AAAZLU mcclister_d_Page_041.QC.jpg
3cf020b17c595a71cf37f7ac79438108
201080038b39023e6ebad8d7cc8fe8f6deac2488
2716 F20101111_AAAXXA mcclister_d_Page_118.txt
8bea3e20857254b6857c0adf9cf2b887
226094b451a60a7ddd31e68544a93ea754b06a02
6411 F20101111_AAAYBP mcclister_d_Page_050thm.jpg
8f5050b1042ebfabb28e0184096dfeeb
679781efd853d74f61811c6ca6e34b78f08d436f
1172 F20101111_AAAXEW mcclister_d_Page_002.QC.jpg
6170ec27bd347b0ba560a7e80adc0167
3d1d6fa4feb46e579853ba99d1b53783dfa176da
6787 F20101111_AAAZLV mcclister_d_Page_195thm.jpg
502220bade0bdfb826bb2a7640d47e86
4534df56cd92651948f287e954a8b54b7429d2bb
F20101111_AAAXXB mcclister_d_Page_183.tif
a02802c9211f565bb1f5365ecb2efc6f
8d3bfabcc020fc757da9b02a885202a10af63294
52567 F20101111_AAAYBQ mcclister_d_Page_229.pro
fc6205222ca42c0bcee4d351122f2024
db40d248628df83809cfc9fab88caba2817f1227
2214 F20101111_AAAXEX mcclister_d_Page_133.txt
875c0b0412ab8e94bcad0f1d1999e618
5c53d28484d7f6346e91c6262c1563aeb460dfd2
92832 F20101111_AAAXXC mcclister_d_Page_277.jpg
d57d3eeebdefec4422ef01e3b7ddea21
5a48e70f1dc0a906ff91a4409d27026900864dec
3500 F20101111_AAAYBR mcclister_d_Page_005.txt
e3bcf8b98915c81639b1d21359147f89
d93be50efbf183cff5c4fc2e4752b540d57ffe49
88541 F20101111_AAAXEY mcclister_d_Page_231.jpg
6d494d0893b12bc9a4469f4ea7aac0ef
5ca674fc62e7c4c4d7689cff7472324f87980bd7
28247 F20101111_AAAZLW mcclister_d_Page_294.QC.jpg
5381df0a0202810a76300323421ab13a
ad7c189cefcd7645ba7bb0ad92ddb45febe52d4c
120463 F20101111_AAAXXD mcclister_d_Page_086.jp2
9bd9f6b323546f15339263e107d29d93
8ad1d464b58d4e455cdf92087b1d1d9c9f280621
85303 F20101111_AAAYBS mcclister_d_Page_205.jpg
9f207e02ca76f81be7b03fa1b19dac5c
bc6bc1abe89221d12fb564c497e7dd37b5e74fe9
67509 F20101111_AAAXEZ mcclister_d_Page_058.pro
63682c2b06855f21d9ac4eca9c067fbf
6b1295cc33224d074a1430dd95e9e90f06d96c53
29966 F20101111_AAAZLX mcclister_d_Page_266.QC.jpg
6facecc9300bfe774f681d9158469f0f
8748ea8aa000874c580078b69ed671391597c2bb
27532 F20101111_AAAYBT mcclister_d_Page_136.QC.jpg
ce76a17b19268460162003affedfefd9
4b263e6a182257eef6fd46765284be885435405c
26163 F20101111_AAAZLY mcclister_d_Page_275.QC.jpg
4c9eb1ee81098488349324ff9d05f51e
c2949933a83f9aa485847bb364be289883f55406
6501 F20101111_AAAXXE mcclister_d_Page_097thm.jpg
f091c6623ccceef5238256a217d3cf12
b309db44350791e5756abb455e885223b0cf4f12
6829 F20101111_AAAYBU mcclister_d_Page_268thm.jpg
f43133bf166a29755225498138ab40ca
8eb1031a51c33ff6856b57a58b2ce4ab865381bf
F20101111_AAAZLZ mcclister_d_Page_276thm.jpg
bd0150c1de882f477b746dc81f9bb927
81fb7fc3f796ee3f53f96910bc8de54437b5b9cb
F20101111_AAAXXF mcclister_d_Page_100.tif
e9fb72b3d77cf1d6f9291e3540310e5e
2ecb51e1f3ea78a5e57bafb19ef7d32b5435df98
F20101111_AAAYBV mcclister_d_Page_273.tif
f45c370d6c1c1cbc532797110c39df91
b34cc66152e07d3716c2eb3a52f957e7ec2fe5e0
28662 F20101111_AAAXXG mcclister_d_Page_206.QC.jpg
ae065016915e6f388b932243ebc6bdda
d544f72bca3882c98258cce321977d5425b5fb2d
27883 F20101111_AAAYBW mcclister_d_Page_200.QC.jpg
04d588bcefe5542d388394c7dc3dd960
2635d21d231dbe708af84a592309f97e5e9ad350
2187 F20101111_AAAXXH mcclister_d_Page_024.txt
cb607dfce4fcbeededd5fd8d04357c32
6a5a0fcdff67473d31acd16ccc274b1f813c288a
116811 F20101111_AAAYBX mcclister_d_Page_135.jp2
574850f788f59f89d96de120a9bd411d
301f204fa8754380a97282b10630b30e033f9b95
27593 F20101111_AAAYUA mcclister_d_Page_004.pro
b4735f80c7c7598eeaa8255aab8bb667
1024e1dca2f957a3a4e3e1f0a7eda288aff39436
111062 F20101111_AAAXXI mcclister_d_Page_189.jpg
690e75f819abaf202e85791e75e8c4b1
78c16a44a49e11e29fbd64dd59f8caaad1e08b9a
62946 F20101111_AAAYBY mcclister_d_Page_195.pro
f4fa39c3c9ca8c0ceda29f0798344c73
13cfebc708c5fe14c796859189025f70e21f237d
85057 F20101111_AAAYUB mcclister_d_Page_005.pro
c3eca199a50b448e1d04ec83c4649ad5
0f376f71a036c7af58e48edc9ae66921948137a3
F20101111_AAAXXJ mcclister_d_Page_109.tif
168fc8104fdd79bd8ab71bd8abe943ca
c6b8655c4eaabacc6b4b7616d2f264e3ecd7c54f
122631 F20101111_AAAYBZ mcclister_d_Page_124.jp2
226a457a501341595c9ca3d3f50b5719
c3d6df2f70f43761a6867a0fe3341446ee65c0a0
45663 F20101111_AAAYUC mcclister_d_Page_007.pro
329ba83848dd4706977dddb7816cae6c
d39f527e504e9602f90a507af9bfc3a451f1187e
98233 F20101111_AAAXXK mcclister_d_Page_054.jpg
62207897be7f1698a14eb9401fd48d9d
e2b49903cd1e38dc92b467e7b8cd35ee5231f25b
50065 F20101111_AAAYUD mcclister_d_Page_013.pro
af3a9df1c607e55913583a2b17e260a1
9dcec535d48608093db139b975db7c29a3c7a672
30315 F20101111_AAAXXL mcclister_d_Page_048.QC.jpg
893b18bdd5025e44e5022f6376becf95
b2396e4e5e58ea40d5a5e367e58a5fa749e58376
69725 F20101111_AAAYUE mcclister_d_Page_015.pro
4ecaba8f42a417905fe6c4d2afc3a335
e29760029bc7aaa0d09ebc9d9093d90b3fa58b50
90789 F20101111_AAAXKA mcclister_d_Page_213.jpg
0c2d3909805cefc40545a107b2988080
039e22e6e9e98195e7cf282c904dd870966e88d7
7242 F20101111_AAAXXM mcclister_d_Page_001.pro
712f5a038c6dc684c33f460ea145ed79
3ec64b1e6afca6eb18f5cb864f0b81efa6d7ada2
56704 F20101111_AAAYUF mcclister_d_Page_017.pro
8451dcdc01ba349feee275625837a9c2
30cf57fe126e136014a6b89b31ce3434a3c07161
114250 F20101111_AAAXKB mcclister_d_Page_197.jp2
f8e676e87bf77476000a78d5e05e4c4a
c8a376b6904c6ef0ece1c4c1452554fe46dd7310
103354 F20101111_AAAXXN mcclister_d_Page_219.jpg
7902aa04d09f19dd9fa3e11dd988447b
4d1f946757d9bf10d5dbee165d1b5115a714a045
49948 F20101111_AAAYUG mcclister_d_Page_019.pro
430eb96a853b9a551dfefdc8b7855051
0ec39e2d908c11f5efce86a609fea4070eb36b3d
27148 F20101111_AAAXKC mcclister_d_Page_128.QC.jpg
adb6707f5c6d784788bfd6640571ba2e
f2083b96b397fc7ad4043bacc9aff05c91138aae
6354 F20101111_AAAZRA mcclister_d_Page_128thm.jpg
d5723df5f94fec72fc2acb074e077d67
d8a3bec72ec264c93d6f82cf6cb712832cec9c89
61822 F20101111_AAAXXO mcclister_d_Page_097.pro
5e39cd32be0277f7ff733967ac2f0c04
79e034fbf7856a6e265b15933994edeefae76e79
70549 F20101111_AAAYUH mcclister_d_Page_021.pro
5b04a46cf96d58fdb526149e0c7da25e
c7dd32f4750d91c5d1ec009d3f222043ab3f6d19
28414 F20101111_AAAXKD mcclister_d_Page_258.QC.jpg
8abef6e7531683114158634419f0e92d
1d38b1a7dcd9bd340711a2c64f48fba0d9617562
6681 F20101111_AAAZRB mcclister_d_Page_130thm.jpg
7f1029972bb15d4a17a5dca585c8d5a9
57a463314a0efa62917d3620c89a7893330a515d
2284 F20101111_AAAXXP mcclister_d_Page_115.txt
8cebe92d9b39d7203e70b4727acc6c10
d09d99d4d594e56b6a9eb1e7ff2b3a57cfc70e99
58719 F20101111_AAAYUI mcclister_d_Page_025.pro
bba99c3047fcd9ece76c96a677472848
18c4fa8bdacad1780c0f8c8757aade04f89f6138
2215 F20101111_AAAXKE mcclister_d_Page_060.txt
c386c80ba9584079dbd146643e980317
df67caca9403e7472250fc1f16451b5d6c4d7aba
7031 F20101111_AAAZRC mcclister_d_Page_131thm.jpg
a6465414378f95c60fdced586eafb664
bf6ebfab55120e33fd4cdfda548eaae205e4e083
F20101111_AAAXXQ mcclister_d_Page_043.tif
3cf3ec92bdb94379a45867a96d7279af
ccb71b68e93df374a5e2530c26cbe30c4adb91f4
59228 F20101111_AAAYUJ mcclister_d_Page_026.pro
9e509188e267b0afb13f2001f10682b4
cec0ac3b34154dd7c98e12efe7d4cc571092ef79
2251 F20101111_AAAXKF mcclister_d_Page_216.txt
4dca2f8a2f5e53839c39d521b834809e
7f6daca319dbf0e75420971e586bad7ee29052aa
28792 F20101111_AAAZRD mcclister_d_Page_145.QC.jpg
002203e5cf590b252e1ebdaaf9d1e7ac
9599efa29963fe2ceb67a293a1a5c34f81edede1
F20101111_AAAXXR mcclister_d_Page_030.tif
a709fb20f536725375a684e792a3e240
1e4ab45435fe602a930b0869d498499369202948
57731 F20101111_AAAYUK mcclister_d_Page_029.pro
f61c7a4f5dbb6708f621131bb8e4d5cf
54060e6d7536ff32c03fc5aeb37d2f7f0e3a758b
2426 F20101111_AAAXKG mcclister_d_Page_059.txt
5176f9de97898b92b8a34363e7469ec1
08de8ad3f244481f85e70d57ea2c920b0120cc7d
16411 F20101111_AAAZRE mcclister_d_Page_146.QC.jpg
78f744b98d2699ce824913a08d2cac9c
550a932ed50580efc6d36e41644b005a9361d21d
112267 F20101111_AAAXXS mcclister_d_Page_229.jp2
430b4902c09604ad4cdd99d82ade7e72
4c5ec669ce9f6dd6e96c4db1aad655b83a96c53f
59867 F20101111_AAAYUL mcclister_d_Page_030.pro
d37f9af1365aa7e6afde0437ea678534
192feed685e362a05e7f8e7985c8d6f1352fdb85
2046 F20101111_AAAXKH mcclister_d_Page_158.txt
810dc6edfb353fb7fedbb6fc1b443085
ad85c367f08c5d747f12e04f7cf81df4d3c43986
80370 F20101111_AAAYHA mcclister_d_Page_203.jpg
0516a3a5f6956a4a0d9ccb22e6eeb8ee
ae69cbeda88f9bb86d70920fcdbbd9f1f7ce0c8b
6721 F20101111_AAAZRF mcclister_d_Page_147thm.jpg
6d104b95e03a5fcf07572e24038d9750
52c3c1a4f58bc2cfb1bb46be56d2ea5851a60cb7
F20101111_AAAXXT mcclister_d_Page_022.tif
f906666e1e25cebfab8a8b49bca7166c
8c6c26070812a58dd134ff8830ee2896119ac097
69399 F20101111_AAAYUM mcclister_d_Page_032.pro
d2386bea435c19c3204db56a4283dc80
49e4c862df651e5e6fc53c3a5018863479ea8b39
88839 F20101111_AAAXKI mcclister_d_Page_052.jpg
6918560f42b99a475811d160fd30672c
98696d7b1278e47a6a50c05811c52f8dc30113af
78294 F20101111_AAAYHB mcclister_d_Page_204.jpg
219fb836db6ab301bec6b2646268ae7d
5e8d8ae3600b44baad85d7f1ff4e31111a0665c1
6795 F20101111_AAAZRG mcclister_d_Page_165thm.jpg
eef4ca53c5da532faa6c8d90f62f84d3
54b0eafff9b74826c90a6d74591725091b19c4ba
2403 F20101111_AAAXXU mcclister_d_Page_132.txt
e8f7b95cc51d10b9d1571be34bb15be6
6638006fe3afd291f0284400f8f16e93a515e561
54477 F20101111_AAAYUN mcclister_d_Page_033.pro
7348b3d908f6ca1531a1bddbcb3ff017
fae90ea88bd80473bbd16926b9191caea1f558eb
29281 F20101111_AAAXKJ mcclister_d_Page_062.QC.jpg
0b6517e6d490dd8045569278f00d8d4a
9b1229509e5a31baf217cd8b7340269478e72ce3
94551 F20101111_AAAYHC mcclister_d_Page_206.jpg
aff58218a6305bc34c690d5886993e2f
491562c7bead118e7090f8ffa77ef50c5473e137
6249 F20101111_AAAZRH mcclister_d_Page_168thm.jpg
88bfcf29f1092c9b8070566834b94aed
6788391995bf5bc8fb4cee59adc1d5be940be27e
54152 F20101111_AAAXXV mcclister_d_Page_035.pro
4092b231db2b2e864e7c9f39294f7767
155cfb89906497a45dd53832f4423758a19050af
51847 F20101111_AAAYUO mcclister_d_Page_036.pro
d44a3d76a53f6deaba1adf8b1d2ff5da
831dad1ed335805a152c56b59a1f8270ceffffe3
2827 F20101111_AAAXKK mcclister_d_Page_296thm.jpg
72cb9113dac5990715e16b774a44cf50
340abc052ee31cfee10dc7c7114a02db510c5875
100358 F20101111_AAAYHD mcclister_d_Page_209.jpg
7e3c2ea76c3c9618fcf3462f6e47b498
b55c16f4d5e2e287a6b50b3b085c392cfb93b499
29614 F20101111_AAAZRI mcclister_d_Page_175.QC.jpg
f0dac273a8667b620e3f00b2a95cf596
09f6e5703aa2e27ec459e14597ac4c6fc3135139
F20101111_AAAXXW mcclister_d_Page_152.tif
578ab4bc08ffa43ae869928edc8f630a
6a9cee79378d10281e9e15c4c324db120af9bbc6
62650 F20101111_AAAYUP mcclister_d_Page_038.pro
2eba764c39e7833b756015f32a74cb22
653fc7613b1e1d60d329b6381b38ef621993f8a6
6451 F20101111_AAAXKL mcclister_d_Page_207thm.jpg
86df9078484740dc3d9cbc5a9f5d7582
2f3d1ce99f45280f4212f3ad2bf93e017777935e
95609 F20101111_AAAYHE mcclister_d_Page_211.jpg
2c1fc94ea1a0bd7af3dab1c01c71df2a
a3316f8bf0d26405f5d027be37512089f6c6a7ec
6826 F20101111_AAAZRJ mcclister_d_Page_178thm.jpg
17d1303cc2e9ec8dd2dec87069818ada
40b5da6eddf0daca398b0f795a06d1b60c84ec8f
68003 F20101111_AAAXXX mcclister_d_Page_012.pro
04c7f49e89c20960ff39d4287d15c03c
2942b71c21040074bdae44f134b65fe84f7656a3
53217 F20101111_AAAYUQ mcclister_d_Page_039.pro
8342bf52e455ad28dd60ee3fa538ae98
f069edf268829c32726484419e84e2b2a8dc38e7
110546 F20101111_AAAXKM mcclister_d_Page_032.jpg
eba0f752c079a74d2e66deca571710fd
a80754d39c571a0e64560e54a10a519b3dfbbb5b
95667 F20101111_AAAYHF mcclister_d_Page_214.jpg
10dbb639714255255fbd8cfb1d2ee4c6
61c64da45e7509c5596824fa69fdfa25f5688236
29419 F20101111_AAAZRK mcclister_d_Page_179.QC.jpg
3f955fb732a8aa75fc0a0720968c2cb4
dbeb97a3b776371ba0d336a7ad73caf684a13e82
118350 F20101111_AAAXXY mcclister_d_Page_172.jp2
769a7044d8c4ee528a2dee8f6c0226d7
19be1f5b06ce8994fdec22afd5485586888eb85b
57836 F20101111_AAAYUR mcclister_d_Page_044.pro
65b67b2f2a23929e798a67b5ffacff8e
4f32fc00a853eaa5a2fd5ffd029c596aa6dae002
7034 F20101111_AAAXKN mcclister_d_Page_179thm.jpg
4c0f2ddeaaced876c7c7c1ddfe61b09d
65fbd84f8e209edc4bf4c058a6f199f0c180db0b
82335 F20101111_AAAYHG mcclister_d_Page_215.jpg
269a2b05f5be76ba53158cc37e80e0c4
a1efddc41eabb0b7aa033f0cc3b883f6c2e8d56d
14893 F20101111_AAAZRL mcclister_d_Page_180.QC.jpg
fed29451e685ef80a4992856371ae110
22ae256aa41da50a41d2133d35392cef2de99f5c
2350 F20101111_AAAZEA mcclister_d_Page_193.txt
2bee33bb0f580dc6705a591a67ae69de
76dddd7f8dc013a1f483f0357e0cc51075f7501e
89317 F20101111_AAAXXZ mcclister_d_Page_221.jpg
1492a39547d9166821787603f3f35575
bad44116759d43ca21c7fc9916aede0f4e53f3fb
50055 F20101111_AAAYUS mcclister_d_Page_045.pro
3d4d3086d616d0d101fba80b70ba4656
5b13a112a002c204ab9201a319a6448914e34ff4
29903 F20101111_AAAXKO mcclister_d_Page_034.QC.jpg
05d4571792de79d89e53007fe805deee
1dc43468e952b8bbc01f2fa8ee066ff72608fb7d
89680 F20101111_AAAYHH mcclister_d_Page_223.jpg
f6c96b94a2efe2ffd53fced85b450d76
25e54dea89554da874e5289669164deb25ff962e
29088 F20101111_AAAZRM mcclister_d_Page_193.QC.jpg
17409c724eb9e8acf36748cb30800bea
a7815b733cbaab11c75cd079a9b1005c6097ecde
2182 F20101111_AAAZEB mcclister_d_Page_194.txt
7940a88a795f0145f276c5ceb18d371d
d88dee7b738dc868732274296ab2b5af95e72bd5
53533 F20101111_AAAYUT mcclister_d_Page_050.pro
18b0196adee8efff689095f2c7fe2d4d
4e50200d3fdc05cde87e6d34923b25eb82d97939
6692 F20101111_AAAXKP mcclister_d_Page_185thm.jpg
d584d9666365b0ceb57dae50c1e4f821
040245ddd1e98355a99402229307a14e1c4c8e46
88061 F20101111_AAAYHI mcclister_d_Page_225.jpg
5dd2d45b6ca3a1ac06909f4ff6a1dde3
41d46c172065b91097a87f6537f9335d310dff04
6126 F20101111_AAAZRN mcclister_d_Page_197thm.jpg
7043f6a525d7815ac36bd9c40f27bc49
7797cd6bce8b1a302f9d43915da9b84018a074bd
2241 F20101111_AAAZEC mcclister_d_Page_198.txt
4b4350db07a8c20b557388f8f4c4bd1f
b59d9096f57a688e0ad79f73e7d6032f97ed5d61
56988 F20101111_AAAYUU mcclister_d_Page_051.pro
c82b1c9ca0bca916f4a220fef9c7d0d6
05d60c6a8f0df7e702b9d98d86d5d8ff658f6c44
107137 F20101111_AAAXKQ mcclister_d_Page_260.jpg
8237b39cd53657b9a011026dbbcc1e99
28be0dcfd487215badd21b8ff89f55bedb26bc8d
87185 F20101111_AAAYHJ mcclister_d_Page_228.jpg
2ed129bc40d2ee09e607f7f18ccdd943
9cd2d3ef67f817e91561d0e163ed1508ff79e5d4
6511 F20101111_AAAZRO mcclister_d_Page_201thm.jpg
15520744e54c84183fb4c589b6f06f25
cec862010231fbe3d3a734996e244d94a6bf5d07
F20101111_AAAZED mcclister_d_Page_199.txt
467dec30f5114ab6d8d77ef2d001cf7b
7ce5fe80b2353220b7629a0b7a53b3c484954b6c
62114 F20101111_AAAYUV mcclister_d_Page_054.pro
76171d7391f7e29f2cb68002a705bb29
3a4c66a5be3a3120ff31d4f1a4a9782cac6692e6
28294 F20101111_AAAXKR mcclister_d_Page_177.QC.jpg
a5ba97ac99605ee64e1e5971bc7b3d88
0240ea8a4c9db3cf48b3226cf7c029195db6beb9
89200 F20101111_AAAYHK mcclister_d_Page_232.jpg
8f792753ba9fc2f15b6d0897cc6cd2c6
700528e59e9bfbdecbb51d69bb18310aad28d3e2
6973 F20101111_AAAZRP mcclister_d_Page_202thm.jpg
fbd1b33a8f84b5a5e39c5e3b3e187ed2
5926750e9f75ce43f9fba956a58728c8cacc1d28
2122 F20101111_AAAZEE mcclister_d_Page_200.txt
3c63b210533d210edc43ee0c32cf180b
313dadcd3e98acd51445037553270bf521ec8369
54350 F20101111_AAAYUW mcclister_d_Page_056.pro
714c59c6667a6bcb5bc1d1c34d0b26f3
9687137e455c76e5acb072509b879288b60c7197
113933 F20101111_AAAXKS mcclister_d_Page_057.jp2
94149a77675aa5326cf2607c13ae346e
a9630a1549fac704ef3419ec7aaf61959c618847
107217 F20101111_AAAYHL mcclister_d_Page_234.jpg
b46aa5a01c709d03092def56cb166f49
49536b69a922cb8767e18e74512f8c17edd01098
23407 F20101111_AAAZRQ mcclister_d_Page_204.QC.jpg
ffae5d710610f43fccdb789d5a0f2b13
7162487c6e3c1fc7643b88ed04a28d57d2f07636
2568 F20101111_AAAZEF mcclister_d_Page_201.txt
30ec8c362d3db0a7101cbd56bd316a0d
ba01352a3db0a357f004ecfa23373818a19da820
61230 F20101111_AAAYUX mcclister_d_Page_059.pro
52685bf547c8f20a35972f18fc12e403
02b99aa6345be4fa946740fe6c04ebaaf635c420
F20101111_AAAXKT mcclister_d_Page_289.tif
12dccb290031eb974f8b40d29433ed61
b2d5d79e439040635a2c72e8cb6e0197ef4d6cb6
95633 F20101111_AAAYHM mcclister_d_Page_235.jpg
84ede340bf7d3a7dbe6e56b48a4379dc
3c7d71dcd32e4b7f201984d32b6e0a1fc9a25396
5508 F20101111_AAAZRR mcclister_d_Page_204thm.jpg
74d2fc197ee706c49e17bdf8664dc429
6329ddc1a70444f62a64755b8a44c35fd39c91a9
1887 F20101111_AAAZEG mcclister_d_Page_204.txt
8f137a9e46a09b6241b5a977dc588b1f
96fb8facacacfc1af76c8aa7b5e6b19e94b9dd89
61005 F20101111_AAAYUY mcclister_d_Page_062.pro
5700628be623edc5b3bf9f14fc2bdd0f
c48561a08e5312744cfca5f8c87936011da6d7a4
2547 F20101111_AAAXKU mcclister_d_Page_080.txt
d39ecc087823bdb915f49650fa253520
bdb5eff1225f3e21eda7a333094ac57aba2d10c8
91315 F20101111_AAAYHN mcclister_d_Page_236.jpg
79801f457b6c0d37a0056d294d839fcb
4f81a8c31640cdb964cbcb13a2445d37a423f4e7
6545 F20101111_AAAZRS mcclister_d_Page_210thm.jpg
b14d56c783314d2c4f3c0436c086bf14
8ce5bf9fe85d2a52c26ea841eb3ed516dbdb265b
2084 F20101111_AAAZEH mcclister_d_Page_205.txt
9394f213c48501d5e40f8f72137f57e6
653bf2680b07438b9531a529c67f8a54c2c258e0
54122 F20101111_AAAYUZ mcclister_d_Page_063.pro
55ff477595ca1d7366bbe8e2cb4c598b
c5df41cd07cfd20cefee1abe7f8d533f00be2835
6944 F20101111_AAAXKV mcclister_d_Page_134thm.jpg
ee83ce9c82bed732ec534cddc02b9bb6
eac0a0593de2e553b8c32656d92f3e58674418da
86505 F20101111_AAAYHO mcclister_d_Page_237.jpg
dab8466ca9d1cbdd409c02a3cebad2c2
3794e235864eb4e571715d3b280dd86ea82570d1
6783 F20101111_AAAZRT mcclister_d_Page_211thm.jpg
1a372ae76bcd185b51fe1ed38da0d4c9
6e27450da978f78e8ad3b668418c6869129d7c3a
2248 F20101111_AAAZEI mcclister_d_Page_206.txt
be4832ee76ed3cf727ae1312dc1c35eb
d81dffe169b011dfe48add5c2bf3b79b2f15f72d
5814 F20101111_AAAXKW mcclister_d_Page_001.QC.jpg
338a810ee2a422dfce41f5fd23675758
f4d50f1bc6d30937a275ddd31ef59e5a4559ae9e
89332 F20101111_AAAYHP mcclister_d_Page_240.jpg
1419804c12f5263a97743aeff95fce12
53359b1933b9e718a5540e01742eb6b385cb67b2
6599 F20101111_AAAZRU mcclister_d_Page_221thm.jpg
f44c06936a8fbf7f499f8b8c6bd7b2d7
8f2ac6929620742ce7a2c40e23fcee1af6eb1fd6
2456 F20101111_AAAZEJ mcclister_d_Page_209.txt
01ca2f9943bf6397fcd44d5370265130
e8350127a4207bb687815f9e127e9a8bd185210c
89420 F20101111_AAAYHQ mcclister_d_Page_241.jpg
0934b7aa79cc20ac53027c153f38acc3
368eb0308f89a78571ad842f5fc87980783fa2ae
27488 F20101111_AAAZRV mcclister_d_Page_228.QC.jpg
9c3e17e13dc60ce0ac05f105fcf9f63b
d5389491bc9e4b318a2690fd611c4157edfb693e
2114 F20101111_AAAZEK mcclister_d_Page_212.txt
f60993889f253ce561a209f7cc5d1466
2b4907468c3813ca2ef454049600f894bb2e7d9a
F20101111_AAAXKX mcclister_d_Page_095.tif
2b70772ab9e1ffa6437eded6969ed695
1a1f0a4c173ba059fd0b5f532cec3a4321d88e4d
87704 F20101111_AAAYHR mcclister_d_Page_244.jpg
57398b6ea85c81892b9ec1649b7a32d6
6a62929b020b6f0d75568714505b3994cc0b64fc
28827 F20101111_AAAZRW mcclister_d_Page_230.QC.jpg
bdd07ffef8c5ec19598d3f74a9940449
d5c0164c8c0696f86d3c1bce49d3f84539ade651
2171 F20101111_AAAZEL mcclister_d_Page_213.txt
b9202443d090ac9b9a2a883eba4d1eaf
36f1e46ab8317ac84925c5d42d0997216cb77c55
29203 F20101111_AAAXKY mcclister_d_Page_029.QC.jpg
9540b7344a33dd383df79ca96e1acc4f
4c96334902e8c91fac376ba4b45d24301a822d7a
96120 F20101111_AAAYHS mcclister_d_Page_245.jpg
db4b9f611f1e1b0b236d23ce7db7bd72
a685e466dae30b91a6259ed63f49fd14c5bb2f45
6703 F20101111_AAAZRX mcclister_d_Page_231thm.jpg
09095fb18fefbbb82a0dec2c532f079a
d0478a56fa1bd09ffc79d5cefe41a727751ac9db
2273 F20101111_AAAZEM mcclister_d_Page_214.txt
33940deb476ba5d3dd45a4d82f76ef95
41e27ac59a4ced07a9f979ae6ac6ff78621b6751
27882 F20101111_AAAXKZ mcclister_d_Page_061.QC.jpg
afb5a7036d56e1d867a9c97093b62622
63186c0de4a3c57f53913d88fe64d85d0395bc63
6693 F20101111_AAAZRY mcclister_d_Page_232thm.jpg
c379e8bed32f584775d41b4ea606b372
3279563c2f3f333946d54cbc289ad33006484fba
2533 F20101111_AAAZEN mcclister_d_Page_219.txt
80b79211852b323c7fbd1f277e5ad224
ef864866732243e2ba47a2dd41a85b23397fcff2
121183 F20101111_AAAWTA mcclister_d_Page_022.jp2
8a488ade710013fe841647cddef77d81
778899e2ee055a0b6e29c46b6125d6ca953113b9
96272 F20101111_AAAYHT mcclister_d_Page_247.jpg
8e3005eff16b0055a364a170b8765fae
fb19dc76d5dac4a7bfabe956689dbab90cf8843d
F20101111_AAAZRZ mcclister_d_Page_233.QC.jpg
077625aed9fb825df179475ac72ede68
c03fa8f3afca9a8823272fde40b4e40fda7d730a
2209 F20101111_AAAZEO mcclister_d_Page_220.txt
cd8c2fa72b508100c2d913afc749f5eb
e80e3713c2fab09c0f1c22a8fc8fb35755e0cc68
85301 F20101111_AAAYHU mcclister_d_Page_249.jpg
bdc27e11be5d22ec7dd5b4cc7bae61c5
79a74119f138d9e49fb1220a136df784e2e8a60a
2196 F20101111_AAAWTB mcclister_d_Page_138.txt
469fda7e2e516b4c550b3714011d36c3
8be3496f8d5cc73d03e3967bfb40f797eb6f1081
97320 F20101111_AAAYHV mcclister_d_Page_253.jpg
f86903339d13fb40c88fa6fb5d29a3ad
8b688a61a87f1f16f84dc77ec20ea293465391f7
2055 F20101111_AAAZEP mcclister_d_Page_224.txt
1412b9e44b7fa08b4bc30fcbe58c00d2
c7a933ce54ec616ba0902284879031f48dd57e45
6993 F20101111_AAAWTC mcclister_d_Page_111thm.jpg
a14362916cdfeb41327bc9d8ab1d87a4
aea3ae7113c084ec51b048f9ad6ee68a3d6c767b
91933 F20101111_AAAYHW mcclister_d_Page_254.jpg
c4d5c0142341adc00a554f9745e2570c
5ce1f778c4d00f4566fcf7561acc9715e9ef2536
2094 F20101111_AAAZEQ mcclister_d_Page_225.txt
a4801b83a6eb6a0d60603bb67fa4f01a
46e08a52d48c9c8f2ff5f40089abb4f96fed479d
F20101111_AAAWTD mcclister_d_Page_226.tif
c2b8dfe5c5b28a748a5794937f6d7dd5
1e9eb41f389765fd8c6ca00affd34329209c9b02
92422 F20101111_AAAYHX mcclister_d_Page_256.jpg
3a33e2177070218e6512d9cdbf404a4d
3845414bc9dfd8b1b7bda3a56fc02ff123bfc1ee
2201 F20101111_AAAZER mcclister_d_Page_226.txt
c993b54707332f7628117f0f46f5860c
5e02e020f5c79a11992910a83ead35792e03dc30
30990 F20101111_AAAWTE mcclister_d_Page_260.QC.jpg
a4deeb206929a82dc5b3000352c5e608
4d9af27c0758cd8e3513359e9ef32c46155044e8
105460 F20101111_AAAYHY mcclister_d_Page_257.jpg
077923312cd8475d0941fb57c1fa5f0d
614d5b504a44a58b8b4efc35c9bc4a4feee06a35
2097 F20101111_AAAZES mcclister_d_Page_228.txt
ed083faa0aad2c81d028bef2a4815f4d
2e2750057b8e5d8e3770d6b1267fee62b452c771
53412 F20101111_AAAWTF mcclister_d_Page_156.pro
9c2097fb8444026f19104110549dfbcf
aa98e56e6062abeea536e3027cc7d60857a0536a
92153 F20101111_AAAYHZ mcclister_d_Page_258.jpg
f3df92089d39c2dffceb65f4da558dcd
80c45b714e61a769e086e19b4af400901322a109
2087 F20101111_AAAZET mcclister_d_Page_229.txt
10d990ad4a7801172440084d0201ac01
23834fd50067fc604bf34b0572489c075192bde9
113198 F20101111_AAAWTG mcclister_d_Page_081.jp2
fbc2dde2615d59bc35f7825777bc8b02
7a83d47305cd5d197e8084988c2a3851e5c7355b
2227 F20101111_AAAZEU mcclister_d_Page_230.txt
523be7e56b383c25b692627a4c30e376
e9099695797c8eebc1f73c83663cb90acf355c9c
2454 F20101111_AAAWTH mcclister_d_Page_143.txt
9f598edf0b3e3cee0d082f54183726de
0e1ec331dc31cf4ecf4775abf708dcfa9cd481f2
123470 F20101111_AAAXQA mcclister_d_Page_079.jp2
2423201707e514b37149571c050ebdcd
afce41aadc25a5e0d5797331369e0b58431acf12
2123 F20101111_AAAZEV mcclister_d_Page_232.txt
0f34b0fac0963fa94727f97ea4bf727c
503e31621cbdd5fa229d10c003f7145e8c55b37e
28157 F20101111_AAAWTI mcclister_d_Page_156.QC.jpg
84f9c1c293f6ccd2250d0390c6c524c3
cc3e17a79b17a38e8dd32e6abbd73bf9ec0d5251
F20101111_AAAXQB mcclister_d_Page_208.tif
dd6614949ab2d1f168c51330b67467fd
29806365d3c9693a4ce5a027da900f8e94a3a453
2780 F20101111_AAAZEW mcclister_d_Page_234.txt
a987c32e0152fcc09be5f0cd0cab06ab
76e98d2c11c6461a04566d3168ff0bf292c4d83f
18142 F20101111_AAAWTJ mcclister_d_Page_003.jp2
a920f3e192197566a14de847ddafa423
7a5035d3cecf0903bf779059746c9f313cbf363f
43945 F20101111_AAAXQC mcclister_d_Page_008.pro
5ad514f78829e49ae6534855361d0ebb
c82fb5a52d131bb9c08ce366214356cff2c1be50
2331 F20101111_AAAZEX mcclister_d_Page_235.txt
d4de2536205e8fcbe3e14ae8ef780e44
d2b441458d1926775751e1e81f89021dc19197b1
28447 F20101111_AAAWTK mcclister_d_Page_089.QC.jpg
814d0265163512d55e33e466c1c6cf26
22c61d67a1c09ca0b14c252141d141ec2c8850b0
F20101111_AAAXQD mcclister_d_Page_051.txt
9f21be485b7451533fc136e23d09ad51
74f50d4ef9dfb03ccca05bc3d53ad7a084353df8
2177 F20101111_AAAZEY mcclister_d_Page_236.txt
4fd72e936624c7756087ee34b1d0b4e8
7f56650ed1098443ebf17fc58451256aa3afbbf2
97800 F20101111_AAAWTL mcclister_d_Page_154.jpg
2ca34272de0c1b7ece503c55b718ec93
246b15d102d6fd1a18db15c8beea77a1d90ba060
F20101111_AAAXQE mcclister_d_Page_294.tif
f882576266c4ac87f44bf13f302c18f9
a0addf9480054a0d7e9031bc1c1441118c66b15c
1508 F20101111_AAAZEZ mcclister_d_Page_238.txt
c4376ad16705c85516a89e78a8815304
0ee06a4782a58b2e64861821f331f8b11f594ecb
35112 F20101111_AAAWTM mcclister_d_Page_006.pro
63527264f93b0563d3be7f6607367544
16db42f682227003e786d3fe64fcedfb281c8c3d
7014 F20101111_AAAXQF mcclister_d_Page_183thm.jpg
7920a94fcb339f6204362ce7a28aa087
f01e9b793f613dc690e7f1e37ab5fad28ed253e6
100657 F20101111_AAAWTN mcclister_d_Page_097.jpg
f20113e8d0e559ed6c473743d2dfe8e8
b1c6b9689635c59a97ca40afb3d4e37ccc5c9fbe
132862 F20101111_AAAXQG mcclister_d_Page_031.jp2
fa258e1b21479fd0da455b3d9286d57a
35372df1bb715a5c4188f81b2284da187a73bb15
6811 F20101111_AAAWTO mcclister_d_Page_274thm.jpg
e3e50531134113ca68cbf0fb1dc01e38
b4624c8d3032004a84534cc79cb060f1020c5726
29845 F20101111_AAAXQH mcclister_d_Page_132.QC.jpg
1c78f9766ca96b210bf16bc9cc44b2be
fd322d73b66abe24ef2e41579b4cdb5bc583762b
114649 F20101111_AAAYNA mcclister_d_Page_241.jp2
4f2a11c40cd37da8b200613f4bb51768
599dc30c5936abbf069f17af89d98860cea61089
134980 F20101111_AAAWTP mcclister_d_Page_058.jp2
745357a80af089c994215a28aecc78d7
eb196a82a403e13b11d151a80b58465da0f644c4
119627 F20101111_AAAXQI mcclister_d_Page_165.jp2
4b3f308553ca53793beb8ec0aa4ce2d3
016db8883a36c004b4b45498f0c5477673b5a108
121644 F20101111_AAAYNB mcclister_d_Page_242.jp2
0718b4f461940257d9d06f8e38259aa5
6ba8dd020c756b0e5ef2010f45de4695900fb1b2
F20101111_AAAWTQ mcclister_d_Page_018.tif
00a35b85c6ead5a9589526718ea067c6
82b0ddc0f2daf677fdfd6d337859267f506f75cc
29183 F20101111_AAAXQJ mcclister_d_Page_218.QC.jpg
dc7b122e569485fe6dd5ddd4e29e86f7
b374c9a51ee86742d1bf199dc3802409e20a1e56
125522 F20101111_AAAYNC mcclister_d_Page_245.jp2
fbffa0cb18278ce6989e0d9317e8045c
17a7136a17f3d06122ef19cec6c17a6329205b9d
51694 F20101111_AAAWTR mcclister_d_Page_122.pro
2d895b8a7bdb7c760a11013191f08d11
77b54163bf890dc13e3fe9258da5a7a26bdf7312
F20101111_AAAXQK mcclister_d_Page_087.tif
20107639674ea1d849793a8306f718d0
53c3581e7cf54e83e5ca9e691fd03be99bd17b24
108045 F20101111_AAAYND mcclister_d_Page_246.jp2
2feaa0d3a6c2d15219a381aea6fca6dc
b8a7d969fa1f4a7ab3a17191c43dd490a661bdcb
114834 F20101111_AAAXDA mcclister_d_Page_043.jp2
e1b83bc43fa3b3125a729ed71a652620
82f6a9778507fbca7489a228d0bdd3711d315d56
54956 F20101111_AAAWTS mcclister_d_Page_061.pro
4a987cc5751e1b90d963b93853e2fbc2
b3535f68a56d497986989863fd572605da877712
F20101111_AAAXQL mcclister_d_Page_048.tif
7c9a4f47569fb3730435c6bd201c432f
eab73c7c994a855e9c1597dc8b1141dbe214ddaa
109100 F20101111_AAAYNE mcclister_d_Page_249.jp2
3c66b9d27073c03a4cd9900571dee817
0060c413602febcdcda376c24e4b198e9b807ba2
28280 F20101111_AAAXDB mcclister_d_Page_157.QC.jpg
7c8a89530834ed9ff4f5c450d7e0f117
72d13fd2528444905ea29003aa09b9662451c15c
F20101111_AAAWTT mcclister_d_Page_124.tif
c1b3aea5c931fb3fd6860b5b9e98182d
2f3e152ac1de8686dbe020964dc13af2c6b0f72e
F20101111_AAAXQM mcclister_d_Page_013.tif
4a8ac157a8fe91ddde4dc11c3b6897b2
334d5849934241c1c8b55725cd9919497c2a23b3
110295 F20101111_AAAYNF mcclister_d_Page_250.jp2
f10eccd952c13a1cf1f34bffa7adcf86
181278ded474bb1981a3462ed6e192d696da7d54
93921 F20101111_AAAXDC mcclister_d_Page_150.jpg
15771518ef8ea695b584e9e7230a0141
5ea997ab247fdc8398271c2f8e97f0d092d8aca5
2654 F20101111_AAAWTU mcclister_d_Page_058.txt
266bf8d4cffb890814698b4a67288d47
2623d50eb8e7229e8438ddf2bc8b6353ef18c8fe
64998 F20101111_AAAXQN mcclister_d_Page_291.pro
67bbfb47ee29158dcdd90bc7c45b9a14
22f8a3480646243499f383bb0c6b73883b859fd1
135095 F20101111_AAAYNG mcclister_d_Page_252.jp2
ab31e4ce55ca2e5a391500269f70fdb4
946c03f2b7c8e992ba207a7f2cd9d3b42b3a8dec
6833 F20101111_AAAZKA mcclister_d_Page_264thm.jpg
71ad31dfc1c5f47e857b81c148cfd6d3
8192fab6be7f486200a2bf4d1ff9124aa014bb60
F20101111_AAAXDD mcclister_d_Page_168.tif
4095bbc1cb30371e8e49cc2182625328
c96de5323e69597dd3301620b63432eb54a5b79e
F20101111_AAAWTV mcclister_d_Page_153.tif
74aef9a5a020b5cd30d1efe92cfff72f
c092a59b7001220430fb851264115d1ce22fa511
2752 F20101111_AAAXQO mcclister_d_Page_105.txt
7261dfbf2e49269ee9974f6f8d6421a0
c43eb66fe0128ff291a34298e416658e1073ee9b
118451 F20101111_AAAYNH mcclister_d_Page_254.jp2
67732025b4addd2f2161115f2211a865
3160dd71f3c4d2715977b4d377a56ccaaea3377f
6604 F20101111_AAAZKB mcclister_d_Page_047thm.jpg
6743cbaece2824d0b1ce6ab6b51b136b
7ba9382b0d5ea9ba9d0f94f90a8ecfcdd54ca775
139272 F20101111_AAAXDE mcclister_d_Page_291.jp2
4c7d30c9c48c2f25b36eb991dd79b5c0
f0c18824ffef60a559e4cbfb0134c9de20d004eb
F20101111_AAAWTW mcclister_d_Page_250.tif
ee50275c7210668cc1b44575a7638642
f5906a2d363ec4deaa11649007f4d6e377307457
57095 F20101111_AAAXQP mcclister_d_Page_152.pro
165147b6c2edcb99229d06f16adae91d
9c4d1c4372ea121bb4471347d8ddccba81e7bed9
131025 F20101111_AAAYNI mcclister_d_Page_255.jp2
ff53b75d0b24b9d296c7e4dafd5c3220
5b14773c54ab157a8b0637392d5947ad3e9c9fd4
6852 F20101111_AAAZKC mcclister_d_Page_098thm.jpg
c603f73fe6333e845a5cccc42d34ceca
f16a6032e2aadd06f4deeed82e9f5f19ac62371e
2191 F20101111_AAAXDF mcclister_d_Page_148.txt
76176e3e525a3cd3a8c3de374255a6f4
12c13ce424c89687f34a7e983359bf913312dd51
F20101111_AAAWTX mcclister_d_Page_207.tif
1b2262ee60a3de175dfbb69ccce025a8
9a286c7246f0bcb6479a7fd47867ed463c4cd3ee
117304 F20101111_AAAXQQ mcclister_d_Page_194.jp2
d2ca70673042fa3ccb4bdc6056472e27
c275173bc4f3878c00852ed54bb795ced8c3b63a
122057 F20101111_AAAYNJ mcclister_d_Page_259.jp2
37bb0f8a4a6859308e2f7b8eae8e4b64
aae294ccd4df58f30ab679604e76a4ca7541fb82
F20101111_AAAZKD mcclister_d_Page_159thm.jpg
2b50185de8a2ed7d3e244c9807d8f161
b126b4a29864de012a6167abc1d14f1b143368da
25019 F20101111_AAAWTY mcclister_d_Page_170.QC.jpg
8b5d912b794960656873af4462a6cb04
29351c3968e047cf80469fd403463fc41cfa6cf6
F20101111_AAAXQR mcclister_d_Page_032.tif
76cbb758294ed487e9ce0d0e774d3dbc
3be124e34ecc7f6186298492ae3a6fde51505acb
119833 F20101111_AAAYNK mcclister_d_Page_261.jp2
51a85a5cd17f4add17028cd359380870
6d0f790db1f9cde04badd3da0a90090a8552d5e2
29013 F20101111_AAAXDG mcclister_d_Page_176.QC.jpg
ba035c2b46a63a050df6c940b0ec5b21
3c90464ca803b9e919ac44baba75f5648b80aa00
30323 F20101111_AAAZKE mcclister_d_Page_106.QC.jpg
c87d22398aa6c29f7c4e1f1c924e7da4
40b27beac051f8ca936cbfb84434f1dd3297d1d2
F20101111_AAAWTZ mcclister_d_Page_094.tif
2e04e32791528fca4159ec553bfe0122
e207e2b93dc9453ce448b5aa2ff6a50862f816ee
56377 F20101111_AAAYAA mcclister_d_Page_271.pro
5f30bab8195fc55780187a5415284609
72d2ec17ab5211460268f66049a68f2cc2cb4021
125138 F20101111_AAAXQS mcclister_d_Page_104.jp2
8c57782cf60c1b062c235bba7f6c7062
34bf428f61a03de5f35d3f7089b7bca09649bb6e
125794 F20101111_AAAYNL mcclister_d_Page_262.jp2
e6a8a841bb2c82445906df416eb166ab
5927d263e4b06582159cbd86a4b1c397517c1815
2098 F20101111_AAAXDH mcclister_d_Page_223.txt
98123229ee60c3683e168a93dc1198c3
91b572f863dedb8dfec760c9948037a8ffeed11e
30910 F20101111_AAAZKF mcclister_d_Page_058.QC.jpg
dc7d26ce65766504fcb5a6d0e824e77d
0650a03508a17602fc28fc7fef3b11639eed5673
F20101111_AAAYAB mcclister_d_Page_254.tif
4474d017f0ab3e3f5d3942c74d03e154
06f1f4a730766713ae43cf232c539b59edd55ece
F20101111_AAAXQT mcclister_d_Page_026.tif
cdc19e01dc96a61eb0bd25bc72fa87d1
1b316579ca9090452b3b29f3241aee6965f1cc62
117289 F20101111_AAAYNM mcclister_d_Page_265.jp2
351e46c6602c6f06dc0a33bb9b74b9b0
29c8e9570e26456c685afe8e91432137ffce7e5f
114703 F20101111_AAAXDI mcclister_d_Page_232.jp2
9a266a69dba054f7b590aad4a81806c2
e1de103ccbb7293cdf17c0c5f603b338a338d4b6
6907 F20101111_AAAZKG mcclister_d_Page_143thm.jpg
379abeab6e6b9e81ee9f56462460473f
339e1e86154061cf908f92add2b040b428a69a4d
68569 F20101111_AAAYAC mcclister_d_Page_106.pro
9bb16a0f88ebcee4d0345f8a7f8539da
b26b68f342d6175244c84efefb96d3b9b919114f
65186 F20101111_AAAXQU mcclister_d_Page_146.jp2
1343948b8568a36358b05970fa815540
206c4045fcd9f69045d9fe4d4cab1d1340abdb32
21533 F20101111_AAAYNN mcclister_d_Page_267.jp2
458f1105e328d3ddd010bf9d114e68bd
d194165b6e24f8666596bd4458adb7984fc5069d
1504 F20101111_AAAXDJ mcclister_d_Page_001thm.jpg
ba176cfd1c00f4f444b01c1a4191d7ae
e8beb8b910d7278385df14916045f1384b6f295c
7006 F20101111_AAAZKH mcclister_d_Page_044thm.jpg
7965de6b19f4c9a3f0cad2e4b1a1a385
7ecfac1b46052c314a9158812f3f5f68c9d806bf
93305 F20101111_AAAYAD mcclister_d_Page_259.jpg
8b93d14b87d3c86665dc7b9361d6060d
fc662f92f6842b65c871bfe217e99cedebe44887
56463 F20101111_AAAXQV mcclister_d_Page_041.pro
598f55fe56af80fc5c9d05cc6585382f
bbad21991d4ffd473be7f4c9267a536350eef0b1
118033 F20101111_AAAYNO mcclister_d_Page_271.jp2
eef6365a68386a4c629261a5fa8845a6
c394e12c2e29482b80987bfa5ee1d98da9902dc6
419 F20101111_AAAXDK mcclister_d_Page_001.txt
812839bb8fdb9cc48834c6a56bd186d9
26f89a0f82a91aa6eb3c57345c115aebe05a85a9
28629 F20101111_AAAZKI mcclister_d_Page_272.QC.jpg
b3a5f43f3477c7b7ee43671676cbb0ac
8b8dde00914c11f00c417a271c2ca57e4851e9c2
93710 F20101111_AAAYAE mcclister_d_Page_273.jpg
df9aef8d60ff2d56a6c28f9e0ab4db55
0539d0278f2de6300c4c7c04cc3ddbb8eec73df4
137435 F20101111_AAAXQW mcclister_d_Page_234.jp2
933c23824a6aa120edc8616b16b5eb81
ece38f70b33e566c01ad5e7f8f73f7f69b432299
120098 F20101111_AAAYNP mcclister_d_Page_272.jp2
1316d2e93da19cdb31b6f3ad00619d7a
dfd2dc59449078c9cfa1c515c01a1af28019a747
11229 F20101111_AAAXDL mcclister_d_Page_296.QC.jpg
167ef0e5fd15a689485d1dcb3affffc6
fb761e85b9c856099b20101aab6fbd16c737f241
6853 F20101111_AAAZKJ mcclister_d_Page_079thm.jpg
b879b47e4550ddad4ff9024b2d203478
ececc0e6a6e0688b1209a4542d8fa0ea2ebb767c
62191 F20101111_AAAYAF mcclister_d_Page_288.pro
8dbcb3f6525100f8e73e7c2ebf26c400
0068e2fdb6a17145e09454e0fa27cf4e75a8d084
117113 F20101111_AAAXQX mcclister_d_Page_047.jp2
f4bf6f364fba1b3d0f643c3c75fd5094
3efb76de79f9cbc028038b2d227deaf7abdcfde4
120925 F20101111_AAAYNQ mcclister_d_Page_273.jp2
a9905f8419841603b81521cb4e9a53ef
4e0c91b07692aa38c1f1ba9b70a706871dafe173
F20101111_AAAXDM mcclister_d_Page_080.tif
c2cabfbbf0186ddfbdf7a9f573c47251
e758ed8eb4eb44f4b79c99e86502b3bd01984ec3
27830 F20101111_AAAZKK mcclister_d_Page_043.QC.jpg
1b9457dd01ab7e64b620bf987242e179
4bf80727128a7005ed3d7a57d078b29226a89cb6
102328 F20101111_AAAYAG mcclister_d_Page_107.jpg
855e70a13b0102996b8f507831c2b115
dc81263d0b0a3b39b069084c308629adba743069
52873 F20101111_AAAXQY mcclister_d_Page_114.pro
32cdf955dbac0a31d86a3bddf09e1bb1
ee3eb1e4e6e2faff535dba538f6d2dc6eabe3f45
114650 F20101111_AAAYNR mcclister_d_Page_274.jp2
63a099ad034a5e2292f0595dc52771f8
511668353dfcefcf48498378777fab76dc5761b6
84489 F20101111_AAAXDN mcclister_d_Page_069.jpg
bc5f183afad4e9e0abd54e961cf50e90
a8d9453b7f3038ab5f791b745f17db4b51a2a323
7008 F20101111_AAAZKL mcclister_d_Page_014thm.jpg
039bfb039855aa164a8d5a182a0ae6b2
fc1dba8ac46d6e86fa21587faa2c520cacab302a
136255 F20101111_AAAYAH mcclister_d_Page_166.jp2
c02653b3f2cda336c4e288139d0a24f0
b64e84aec6e2293e296943e1fceec4c1afebf11d
F20101111_AAAXQZ mcclister_d_Page_157.tif
9648823d6fbb437e3f6d4a5f10e1eea0
1965d8900e8572334e6a04cde94bf95d30d37eb7
93901 F20101111_AAAYNS mcclister_d_Page_278.jp2
655e24502fff7b8c2433009170a2b0ed
01b6c172593473e943c6836541ba6b4bd15d093b
116464 F20101111_AAAXDO mcclister_d_Page_181.jp2
503c36266970525d345e8c095c250e63
487608f0c1228d098f08d5c859a218329380e37a
28888 F20101111_AAAZKM mcclister_d_Page_115.QC.jpg
736dacd5f149071e43cf8e6198f8020b
60ade84e9b00c2d93c7eca044fdb636dfa60a02b
26151 F20101111_AAAYAI mcclister_d_Page_068.QC.jpg
a45c461bc47a57cc08cab0e93af3a744
8e339db33f56200748f7bcd0d96a2bc2d06b7dbc
125228 F20101111_AAAYNT mcclister_d_Page_279.jp2
7efae74330ab9e2a26208e443b48c332
0fd14c743d5d62fee72a0ba364e4e91341123a12
F20101111_AAAXDP mcclister_d_Page_025.tif
75eee39cbb068301f4d4db485e96341e
682c392ed324214e3a603f3417d974d2f15d619a
27723 F20101111_AAAZKN mcclister_d_Page_221.QC.jpg
0b2837acce06cad789edea64af5ffca2
28bd7a9e3c8e906aa2dd676a8e3ff23ac04b59a4
27276 F20101111_AAAYAJ mcclister_d_Page_279.QC.jpg
772c3bd453a88e76d3192cc6f0b41ce6
85d2fe6494c003f6319883dfb5536b5356e7ae83
128481 F20101111_AAAYNU mcclister_d_Page_281.jp2
183116c5710e5bf8727fbc70ddd03807
d82ffe717ab95181c72949bb3e0a5aa4bfe64ad6
90250 F20101111_AAAWZA mcclister_d_Page_181.jpg
fba4bb89d6c9052c1080259ab574754b
a74afbba283100265a3ea3d7630ae11524f0b6ef
28580 F20101111_AAAZKO mcclister_d_Page_286.QC.jpg
55b1653835b28ff864a1f697949ebf03
7abb7e2e0e2a512e7102241dcde0c0b389a2b627
370 F20101111_AAAYAK mcclister_d_Page_003.txt
0eaa3b6807f915cd0366656fa6fab747
d28d2d46c27ad189790c4e1f48b66ebc6b7739e9
131950 F20101111_AAAYNV mcclister_d_Page_283.jp2
204bcd33439c1701f795865b4a32d249
57d2fce2e7112c6f0d6d5f62d2e91e9d9108d9a5
28201 F20101111_AAAWZB mcclister_d_Page_210.QC.jpg
315b572f2e214c6c0d4e2beb06c2b86c
09c38361f95e869d4a011e54000231b79ad0c3c3
101383 F20101111_AAAXDQ mcclister_d_Page_143.jpg
0a5d823b2b6f3b94fefc64b69b9a760c
2f52b72bd37417e56e72ddcb72e4fbbbc8b6f279
28308 F20101111_AAAZKP mcclister_d_Page_160.QC.jpg
90bdf3dd1ad67b5ec6c802056b095169
0a25ca7430d7b8402e6bec7f67f6e307e8ec6538
64218 F20101111_AAAYAL mcclister_d_Page_095.pro
c7efc6cc59f4facbad1a7795c87315aa
4b8896f42c818b40a127e1d19bc9f72c5dd88ae6
116506 F20101111_AAAYNW mcclister_d_Page_284.jp2
ab136aa388939e49ce4b89308f915fc0
10b6beb6ddae38b8d516f9bef23134e2240dd0fa
2116 F20101111_AAAWZC mcclister_d_Page_081.txt
9157e8c3759fccd26d18b61360d5c8a1
d72e1c1b5655cf2ad65d4ec64da8f4e971384d77
51941 F20101111_AAAXDR mcclister_d_Page_158.pro
fd5a3555c668681f33e4ee5dba7deab8
99eb6b147065f631395854154f10113cf945b4ba
6968 F20101111_AAAZKQ mcclister_d_Page_288thm.jpg
2116a5f54a0f9b5c7e121c27a393bd62
de242a4e14f611f3ddded5b7f5c8877e791dd26f
125783 F20101111_AAAYNX mcclister_d_Page_285.jp2
74faa60f333d42669da33c3594280d8b
7404b2c9cb517d31e95a3252328e36d590269400
1983 F20101111_AAAWZD mcclister_d_Page_188.txt
67462a55f1d623838fe536d663547022
933c3ef4d82d7960bee882c4de3cbf12bce12235
F20101111_AAAXDS mcclister_d_Page_119.tif
b273587c2bb6dee5efe3a203a7ce7fc2
03810b1250d4a08c5baab78bede6a4c28481ad1f
28505 F20101111_AAAZKR mcclister_d_Page_222.QC.jpg
2b81f89a0fc05dfe795b9d1017d5ae12
de859e611ebc3f6cb8b17534852b554143041813
135227 F20101111_AAAYAM mcclister_d_Page_167.jp2
be3e5f88d1af55bef4b0de8ba156a5b7
30af62135db46b76521204e1e805cbb2ef3b43c0
131928 F20101111_AAAYNY mcclister_d_Page_286.jp2
a37ddc33333084d9a4adb5dc3efac1bc
337e65b247c8945adbfcaa5ed1d88a04d171a19b
129263 F20101111_AAAWZE mcclister_d_Page_290.jp2
9b9693e29b348b4de8d6195bb6caa7c2
a9ccc749d0b67da1356b7037740d33338181ffd0
29302 F20101111_AAAXDT mcclister_d_Page_124.QC.jpg
d5ec64f6b7d5b7d26969ddd48ee524ee
71e2fc2661cfc9deb1b21137e18cd4f5e4706d2a
6785 F20101111_AAAZKS mcclister_d_Page_031thm.jpg
7a4d9b80d843152b04e29b2a1950829e
00614e73b2ff1653c6777e364eae0f850c263ebb
F20101111_AAAYAN mcclister_d_Page_243.tif
538565b0a7debfebba9bc34e2daac9bb
d238ec973ecae070ea4b0aa18603b0ccc8fe7e41
104990 F20101111_AAAWZF mcclister_d_Page_108.jpg
89e0dfe7e5e71d3afa6abca1d6b38197
c6bfdca6f06f48d73f794ee5769dcdc7e1da9937
28475 F20101111_AAAXDU mcclister_d_Page_271.QC.jpg
b645dc1078f87aee0a62ec02d090c146
f073288a272e0501cc5e1ab915e8d4b37d32f12e
6012 F20101111_AAAZKT mcclister_d_Page_248thm.jpg
2e3121019c0476a8e5d2c3bad9ede30e
f22a2972ccbf9747933546afaa8d43e9e110d0f8
26454 F20101111_AAAYAO mcclister_d_Page_069.QC.jpg
6cf5f356f235a6954f73cd9070122f0f
b5c99660147f7a3339b9bbf023dd553628f1ab92
140670 F20101111_AAAYNZ mcclister_d_Page_287.jp2
e6e1757ad9678b0dd69c38a0fef5f4e6
7ec4600731a15282fb2f0b576ddf6672a564d31e
86556 F20101111_AAAWZG mcclister_d_Page_224.jpg
63710e6d618999de5489bef231ef16bc
4b347a8372ba392bbc26d9aec340d51fe05b76ea
106456 F20101111_AAAXDV mcclister_d_Page_184.jpg
aca71332453bc967cebabc08061bdcd2
e9cd78f0d374221446fb788e7c95dc3a3c96edcf
6765 F20101111_AAAZKU mcclister_d_Page_086thm.jpg
3cb63d8df3ea55a0170f63f8bad5e673
800e183f2f0bae4e6d40df8dfe14547703832787
F20101111_AAAXWA mcclister_d_Page_235.tif
16d729b271509ce09f8fef84941374cd
b982715b1baf07aabc3b654d87624d68717fbcb4
F20101111_AAAYAP mcclister_d_Page_286.txt
d5003148715b928de6ba0616098c2bc3
c130f8f5b9b14f4b6db87b41bddf16caa8996178
116766 F20101111_AAAXDW mcclister_d_Page_270.jp2
f9f5b2d2f2236e8f711fd185177989b4
05acdd774db019ba66a6110f3f579807bbee6bcc
136723 F20101111_AAAXWB mcclister_d_Page_108.jp2
23daae59412fbbe46ee2df37b35285b3
3c4a57bef316f42980103348d72b85fbd9e24a27
F20101111_AAAYAQ mcclister_d_Page_296.tif
6bfc1c8dd358023227f20fab0cade070
f7ec097b62f4f052a6f5bc615251f64ef610b3ba
26920 F20101111_AAAWZH mcclister_d_Page_182.QC.jpg
3c0527a4f44db2d80229c9613d2ec08e
ce8af5aed97b9fea4220246c6b0e2272e11bd609
121603 F20101111_AAAXDX mcclister_d_Page_076.jp2
e4f9cd6df494adf05110d115a4a8658d
34a4645cd9a4948cb57608d9c713916c2f85e4b0
30816 F20101111_AAAZKV mcclister_d_Page_154.QC.jpg
9f4a77d2574398c1669bf02111bcf7e5
8a99483d110d02982d2a7f455f7595c0658f50ec
92246 F20101111_AAAXWC mcclister_d_Page_226.jpg
7cf1b633d98651c4198b4cb555ed18c8
a767f18e35364245b40c0dcc61d455ecf636b4e3
106334 F20101111_AAAYAR mcclister_d_Page_286.jpg
cfd1f0dc89f3b718b57800a34dc175e4
7712f381fc923b12b2271f27cacdf6fe5819f378
6725 F20101111_AAAWZI mcclister_d_Page_054thm.jpg
4408942a4e433cb3037243e61c42c08b
54024e308d37f04e129e2fac773f3c07357a2d11
94570 F20101111_AAAXDY mcclister_d_Page_242.jpg
6468d0376b7da3a0549b9e374953ce0e
7866698aa2b8427b8d10c399cc4d843145e578c1
26625 F20101111_AAAZKW mcclister_d_Page_067.QC.jpg
76376416c091d7d63e87cd5b691f0510
7bb6c66a674fcddf11773424768d106389ab1a6d
F20101111_AAAYAS mcclister_d_Page_234.tif
2ceb81d69e75185ffa3a2025d786d0f8
790cd97c44aa67ff82f2e1e4e0fa50164c58a71a
27653 F20101111_AAAWZJ mcclister_d_Page_186.QC.jpg
e14e0c4317774e99284b25d07009ca24
0d67c71a91800751d9da756baa8230f88bbcc45b
6430 F20101111_AAAXDZ mcclister_d_Page_135thm.jpg
7c04892755ee721f72547c7bace916fd
05558bff44c56edc3ed3192f78c37e41c2ecc453
27299 F20101111_AAAZKX mcclister_d_Page_159.QC.jpg
02dde174e0630faefb932f32fcfc4fd9
3f1e61995ab67f6e549a38258df84f9cde443f01
27392 F20101111_AAAXWD mcclister_d_Page_137.QC.jpg
2f9e134af83a98ba9001299016a4d264
58ac495e7f89a48ea2b9abd86fb3a6e275148e8a
48826 F20101111_AAAYAT mcclister_d_Page_083.pro
d4ef1ebc06e17f097c7cb6a17318dc2b
c65b861e96f8f8af37db945338cd144b0eb907d1
54872 F20101111_AAAWZK mcclister_d_Page_133.pro
c300754ad2be5732e43eb04421e734ae
dc7861f5752942e09f57c51b358f921b536101c2
6458 F20101111_AAAZKY mcclister_d_Page_192thm.jpg
01ab31600f6c56fed0ba1ae06847c342
49b7deba1d3f4d6a13dd94a797992bb7f41806a2
6425 F20101111_AAAXWE mcclister_d_Page_174thm.jpg
803f116b5b8e943d12f0be931a048aa4
44255267c7da2a53d2b0f0724f531fec615a209c
2050 F20101111_AAAYAU mcclister_d_Page_250.txt
e40626aeed3e45b0cf0492a371f1951b
11d497d12cfdf5859674e648df79e7fcd67d72f9
2815 F20101111_AAAWZL mcclister_d_Page_161.txt
b509dc8242e51c59244b45b3acb5488f
13359f859d1360c154928e80cb175a1b5c2c5645
26294 F20101111_AAAZKZ mcclister_d_Page_246.QC.jpg
05febd362510d06df2f8450d127773a6
922c19ca36df64138ab9d4db455fce8b373b8226
94597 F20101111_AAAXWF mcclister_d_Page_084.jpg
1850498e6b8394b6fe4d1872bb754358
d7ae09f22072c9548fbf4182252fb2c29c020acc
F20101111_AAAYAV mcclister_d_Page_099.tif
2683c963be9f442c8e15447d7692d7a7
6f8e0507b514877cb766fef7494478d7b5306b12
49574 F20101111_AAAWZM mcclister_d_Page_251.pro
37e2c457dc1062275489b881ede9efbe
b556681bc16f081ca9da24bcbac17a89a1e2b6fb
2299 F20101111_AAAXWG mcclister_d_Page_025.txt
be442b26757cf9ffa37203619614d531
d9c32508cd28e47f88f1448e57fae99b219535ae
6722 F20101111_AAAYAW mcclister_d_Page_208thm.jpg
cce3b34c1adccf63d971fd09ef47fdc8
7a178ba4af890d1ec7c611baf42bfbe38ffed1b0
6812 F20101111_AAAWZN mcclister_d_Page_115thm.jpg
86651425b41d621bed22967263a8e447
146cb020ad0ba65ee7da994414bde38b8d907a29
87083 F20101111_AAAXWH mcclister_d_Page_276.jpg
3c3b093dedc577d7634ceaa9f0309d80
92250c5385b963dd08793627e5f2bf308c9275a3
56833 F20101111_AAAYAX mcclister_d_Page_100.pro
accf2290f284ab31d25d9b08bdbeb0e6
5b028a723cebb32c88109dabf3d3d5a105e40054
F20101111_AAAYTA mcclister_d_Page_252.tif
20302f48c43942fff8aea5e4a033747f
0d346a9315dd780722fc6a4cdfb4cdcde6b65049
2145 F20101111_AAAWZO mcclister_d_Page_192.txt
9a52398dc9a44fcf3b8e2337c2a7848b
be0857a81af4c50e2fec284abbb5cee9508d50c5
118393 F20101111_AAAXWI mcclister_d_Page_090.jp2
7ca889f076b810e9e7c8c1d4bb62891f
b4f54313afd45f227584128872983fb0c2bc6dcf
97183 F20101111_AAAYAY mcclister_d_Page_092.jp2
c304985df310ee3a9a42b3b75ffd3e36
f825fc4c55d2044e4ea186b2ae9d21410e2fadf3
F20101111_AAAYTB mcclister_d_Page_253.tif
80ad72d68a5309912bff1e15c05ffdae
ac4e9e2fe06a9d5df67929221bd3ad579604bd96
126995 F20101111_AAAWZP mcclister_d_Page_010.jpg
4979aab6eb6ef269abb0151524bb60bb
877d0c5dbb748cb75baa7bd79818cf753971ea54
87509 F20101111_AAAXWJ mcclister_d_Page_155.jpg
47f191f40af30f5f3f59d4a5f8567e25
5c7fa8a210825b17347fdc9fa1a4d4f576a9b6d3
125837 F20101111_AAAYAZ mcclister_d_Page_059.jp2
fcd5def79088b5042f272efcc93db53f
51107221a377af10402f2eaf9dd546a0c35d3634
F20101111_AAAYTC mcclister_d_Page_255.tif
cd2bcca49287af51c3a3f9816a3cd893
ab68d70104eb51d2cf6d17e899a11748557f6cb4
53205 F20101111_AAAWZQ mcclister_d_Page_225.pro
d058b2fd56e50c87f9dd2668614aea0d
20b21864c1d1e42c62ae5915c6aea2665d87ddad
53672 F20101111_AAAXWK mcclister_d_Page_121.pro
431c049f32c8f5eb83d0177ae4d29547
cb1ec5f3c91d6c19e3db52a0dcab4a99f85aabed
F20101111_AAAYTD mcclister_d_Page_256.tif
1e482dd1c0bc9e602a3f457aed8e1b17
7ea386d16a30d47b588981da2b7ff4d6433bf8ca
F20101111_AAAWZR mcclister_d_Page_109thm.jpg
7f3eadafb96a3fc65d1bba47eb3a3732
5c64821130a11b16b96c4cd4b9adfb72e7947b24
F20101111_AAAXWL mcclister_d_Page_116.tif
4be3977294d7f6cb2e50305cde7263f0
d0d07a0518d622b66c501a16348f7b4602e1406b
F20101111_AAAYTE mcclister_d_Page_258.tif
f6dfeddfd4013e517cf23b4073d4d998
55823d7c76a68c1d53dd507c18c3237aa94166a0
6596 F20101111_AAAXJA mcclister_d_Page_270thm.jpg
7593c687c8d08ef6ac66845deb215cf8
81ef584e133e7ab83fbb49d301493571efc3e06e
32382 F20101111_AAAWZS mcclister_d_Page_032.QC.jpg
d074b574340de2193f669eba2b263b1d
70bd3dbb1d6da7cf1a8e5c64123ef81b58bac72b
59278 F20101111_AAAXWM mcclister_d_Page_042.pro
d002844ba51516e77021be97e047ec80
c60f26c37ce128f81ab7d14ae77c267c5f2ed98c
F20101111_AAAYTF mcclister_d_Page_261.tif
74aa3dbab72c1b8d13499d4b36a81b45
dda8a4f5618eaf396a38dd7db9976f06c93d9765
F20101111_AAAXJB mcclister_d_Page_199.tif
8bc0914fc0f51261e8c21971d46984bc
822fdd2e8bd8480d7b3e87f9e9c71bb5989b585a
91505 F20101111_AAAWZT mcclister_d_Page_174.jpg
467029b96da7e43f365808be88b007b9
d2dbc823b7720a90c003dc79406b817464f81e36
48940 F20101111_AAAXWN mcclister_d_Page_203.pro
f5d4ce5a067532c78951066e0e61ee41
c9e357afa55a85db9a110f730f2af351d93fee79
F20101111_AAAYTG mcclister_d_Page_267.tif
17a5f42a80ffb2f525385308cdee9081
f7dd9c7ed1472e6f114e736be238b8039bc3d144
F20101111_AAAXJC mcclister_d_Page_128.tif
996b4af630ecf85a3a9d2280439147c2
e7cd642be05954632102772f6dde2d643cb19371
2163 F20101111_AAAWZU mcclister_d_Page_066.txt
71ede7784bbedd06731e1766cc7fdff6
a3b3b14ff5f181ccf8b7651fb0750dfcbb5c96b2
6534 F20101111_AAAZQA mcclister_d_Page_033thm.jpg
3c8f43465902c5e8ff6f7f782d019369
9a2164c215e23fa9cb4ede18aa93a08c73a01080
121016 F20101111_AAAXWO mcclister_d_Page_152.jp2
78811cb4b408ef82480e86ea90d933ab
b0f83c398ee8d45ae635d414289664b35e724931
F20101111_AAAYTH mcclister_d_Page_268.tif
d7c6d831ceaf8ebf94f6a108e0b20c12
74b25357f97ebc0601937b5666e80e4e52ea0caf
83598 F20101111_AAAXJD mcclister_d_Page_045.jpg
52c53da03b9928af85cdda2f8ed87f91
1ff3e74be0730ccee89bf8f8a64822f37525f497
2100 F20101111_AAAWZV mcclister_d_Page_276.txt
1063fb96ebad507914e9aae7c88a9d03
dd1a94dc608c6e189d0001642772279a9b5d9b13
F20101111_AAAZQB mcclister_d_Page_043thm.jpg
8c409155e8f71a956fac1a14af71c0a3
038b90cf9a575cb637404daac6da6ad62bba5f67
125597 F20101111_AAAXWP mcclister_d_Page_139.jp2
097a29e108161ed511574772acb0cca9
5906624deba7351057750d037604ee7e0266dcbc
F20101111_AAAYTI mcclister_d_Page_269.tif
b5d26d33a9acadd691730b49a3325242
3d39d284a5f8f82d7f0a98e942514b3c33568ab8
6746 F20101111_AAAXJE mcclister_d_Page_220thm.jpg
6958c84ad7e797dcd3befa74e5897f6c
47c5a157241f10d61835120ec345027987778669
F20101111_AAAWZW mcclister_d_Page_079.tif
01a08c507dc910c31a85fc2f56d947cb
3a337c3c98f112fc258be8f47605e49df9fcdcf6
26840 F20101111_AAAZQC mcclister_d_Page_050.QC.jpg
1e47655229d1f91581012344eabdbd96
3a09cc55b8a926179b50a0eadffe3cb16e567e3e
114263 F20101111_AAAXWQ mcclister_d_Page_221.jp2
1505a2e5a9d0509c2fa38a8bbd6a4970
32adc1d86c990982ccd2fc44d98357306fe6d252
F20101111_AAAYTJ mcclister_d_Page_270.tif
0ce5436e9868a7a123c83450fd1099f0
ca6108f1d07e18c3c6ddca8b09cd684b7f4d6e2b
48760 F20101111_AAAXJF mcclister_d_Page_188.pro
fb04ef6a1aa6e93bf02083656a0d1e09
a2324df5d1f0de7ffc788b094ea3f23cc81219af
30876 F20101111_AAAWZX mcclister_d_Page_131.QC.jpg
a12f62b7dfdcd30f258c685810f2a61d
37d8cd34493754a0bc43b3b8b467de7daa32e497
6407 F20101111_AAAZQD mcclister_d_Page_056thm.jpg
646168876c9f40cf55496c2eb4bc685f
a34461890bace99abe94d3857a644eb423d2abd0
121229 F20101111_AAAXWR mcclister_d_Page_269.jp2
4afb310afbafbd56ea80fd86eaeb30d3
353b9d22d2f627595e477e2c61eaddf51a60dd77
F20101111_AAAYTK mcclister_d_Page_272.tif
ca5afe593fe8cf787dc94e5d82734bd9
2787dbbbf6801ad4e1cff6d5d006c001078947c5
74888 F20101111_AAAXJG mcclister_d_Page_023.pro
3712902995fabc5f0cc0d1eae541385d
7686b9d76db7d3cd28f2768cd3c0588334825fa6
2593 F20101111_AAAWZY mcclister_d_Page_108.txt
b697f7ade94c8e626f0a741840f3bd43
c8f9db17023f62ea7b63516abd5c5bf4b5c5f7a1
26359 F20101111_AAAZQE mcclister_d_Page_063.QC.jpg
f39440bef875e8e29cf10b149a9df55d
0c4ceb3ba2037722230dbde1aee8702dd706236b
95810 F20101111_AAAYGA mcclister_d_Page_164.jpg
0f2696f9c88e4b866bad79bb1f4a8ac7
ad6b6591e8e7a3b1136b31556f602163618de53c
2348 F20101111_AAAXWS mcclister_d_Page_091.txt
162adb09d995b7c968e26acd9414a538
9ead34de2ecb77c12cb7382985b17ad9d5a7b2ea
F20101111_AAAYTL mcclister_d_Page_275.tif
4433e015ab223b1850d07226cd97b4de
4a8c530b13514ee210c592267bf1f3ec3d41ebca
6309 F20101111_AAAXJH mcclister_d_Page_045thm.jpg
b4e6168cbb6810f995f410186e319c29
9503b1af19056cf14535e705afd6ac5c6b7dd65a
84626 F20101111_AAAWZZ mcclister_d_Page_068.jpg
fcf11062d4d428c2a95f99bac944791e
b7f5e349ea814206457e7257544578cd801a9c0f
F20101111_AAAZQF mcclister_d_Page_065thm.jpg
ae67ef635077dad9ebf73192bbc5c465
241f77f21299b637ad4789546867d672d3c2e135
92639 F20101111_AAAYGB mcclister_d_Page_165.jpg
b891c5ad70931de5902ce9cd658df637
d32c3aaac7ae1a9d8cf2b1ef73fc14541dcaa642
104912 F20101111_AAAXWT mcclister_d_Page_118.jpg
dc0f1926a9d74267e08e77812cc9c48a
a45aa22bc985b3e983f5fcffe2a5a5f9120498ba
F20101111_AAAYTM mcclister_d_Page_276.tif
c7773eaaae52c677ef777b86148a62c5
580853f99cc4d1e6f833744e1cead571ec34f702
124533 F20101111_AAAXJI mcclister_d_Page_094.jp2
e32af9144c410b7e0849d591031c40d0
0abab1757a78c03d90930d68743a468af52dc0af
25464 F20101111_AAAZQG mcclister_d_Page_066.QC.jpg
5cfecf429d1679014d930bb40ee270aa
6de666c19eb3f15c76fb3e1f59eb60a9f7be4609
102806 F20101111_AAAYGC mcclister_d_Page_167.jpg
0465f8275d46a4b5ebcd0d60e7b69903
7a18a7e30cbd663c2d4eebdcae702d5f72923aca
58308 F20101111_AAAXWU mcclister_d_Page_235.pro
2860033379f4b4ddd82313f0c1e5fce2
bc6476b0fe96dc4c17f2b8b3822a21d6370566d8
F20101111_AAAYTN mcclister_d_Page_277.tif
3dd6074a058ffc0c4745bc5fbf30856d
0e729a51be80fc80d47cc862a2f33f6be59a1b4a
57348 F20101111_AAAXJJ mcclister_d_Page_028.pro
449c88f88d86c2262938a294a0fd4b7d
7c30b13b022a8f0a01aeda2b8dd1c12e9f87ed4b
6894 F20101111_AAAZQH mcclister_d_Page_072thm.jpg
d9bcc4b0b59ca4e73f96bcbe96f88188
5c7298787eece1fd05f22768a87c140ad671ec70
87011 F20101111_AAAYGD mcclister_d_Page_168.jpg
c97eb097fe4097c28d8ad9ea753f9cee
70eabbe813543ad8cea9f9d363f0519961e37d58
66351 F20101111_AAAXWV mcclister_d_Page_260.pro
1dc1e2e9865db8057230de55b5bc781e
479cb927601494cd4cdfa7476fbcb46f034f6473
F20101111_AAAYTO mcclister_d_Page_279.tif
87bb3a0eb121520f21ed22978f92728a
ef0ca5f6378101361bc1f93c48c5717509f50688
1610 F20101111_AAAXJK mcclister_d_Page_116.txt
81d9f0517d2c20999fc1de1e42bd2472
37ccb541fc054d46a380990915de864e2b596a6f
6686 F20101111_AAAZQI mcclister_d_Page_073thm.jpg
3c985a827e03a765ffabd18094c62293
65fa4dcaf1c0636b2c8bc7b55b485579baa6507c
91896 F20101111_AAAYGE mcclister_d_Page_169.jpg
e9d1e4bceb8b15f0d691382e0f09f542
00ab07ad274ca8e752c86bfeae759fa1c8c62e3b
F20101111_AAAXWW mcclister_d_Page_156.tif
de3fb3906207d506dc4cdfe466ad114f
91ce6c8c352c787979f44376fa3ffdb4c7bf1f7d
F20101111_AAAYTP mcclister_d_Page_281.tif
797f899d305c6fb873ca7f30b2064e41
6f3f2df0aff634d6d24b2a20ebedc41605dce971
2291 F20101111_AAAXJL mcclister_d_Page_078.txt
92c5e71e293e63805b95514c4c3d9a06
65a120fe2739686d01ec3cfd869dbe320b615245
6630 F20101111_AAAZQJ mcclister_d_Page_077thm.jpg
c416868378b599ae5ad14cf0bb5ee659
adde93cadf07d27dd5d1bde199742d316896aec3
79991 F20101111_AAAYGF mcclister_d_Page_170.jpg
364fbd179620db80d3702b7bd2d42eae
8810345b49430e718268faea71bcd62da93fff62
116893 F20101111_AAAXWX mcclister_d_Page_033.jp2
2d08130c621fb80991a00452732ac456
f091c201f4b2daf83243bc051a25f5d3a38db6a7
F20101111_AAAYTQ mcclister_d_Page_282.tif
872ce88d87ec96c4db73b7051ebb8070
a0c5fc71b2240d33703632cc1dab783694e1a262
30200 F20101111_AAAXJM mcclister_d_Page_091.QC.jpg
381e9f7b72a1e2fa18ab610da09000be
1c8b55f341688f9a26fe55f682a523a47ac36b91
28937 F20101111_AAAZQK mcclister_d_Page_080.QC.jpg
03b9f0ee56af85ff8625786aa0988bb2
433703a6eaa4ee32be4261582c493b6fad039d49
94428 F20101111_AAAYGG mcclister_d_Page_171.jpg
635811d49b5b0f84fcf4d9b6cce85bad
17d403235713f4c6139cd9c24d9adbafff0b7a11
28746 F20101111_AAAXWY mcclister_d_Page_226.QC.jpg
38a9a616fc742526a60427ac7f14fe96
7024b26fdd6ca93d72bd54c5422e9ab1e87a4d63
F20101111_AAAYTR mcclister_d_Page_283.tif
189dd6b5520d44e8de98acef82bcaa2b
7a76cca3eb1b0a7c18d1b2bf7bd3c9d1a2809ac6
111249 F20101111_AAAXJN mcclister_d_Page_069.jp2
e94c6ea6f7b8ab453061d3d92c69c75a
ce7ac2d1d498fbc523d89b286340f23073e5167b
27355 F20101111_AAAZQL mcclister_d_Page_084.QC.jpg
f01f5444e850d2cbc53aece8e2ec5c69
53ef7ec00e9822379c846915f3ec4ec5fe55b8eb
92086 F20101111_AAAYGH mcclister_d_Page_172.jpg
79558ec01ad52809bd4de0e628a9e1f9
af9e5cc0132c4cf81e13e4af6218a538250e1596
7003 F20101111_AAAXWZ mcclister_d_Page_214thm.jpg
947575a1eab184c3d7d4f6126a36f267
b819399931635fd12e11e97f8e6a21aed526bb94
2310 F20101111_AAAZDA mcclister_d_Page_136.txt
35a2fd5599ddc06979eaf8c26a75c90b
e9b7a3455c0344df22f3cad66ef72d6a40b8a299
F20101111_AAAYTS mcclister_d_Page_284.tif
db7283ebf0152c110d0c948b15ccd093
abe2bd3918804925c199a07d75757711f6b0d24f
6935 F20101111_AAAXJO mcclister_d_Page_164thm.jpg
6e768bd71b06667da80a0366b3b2d789
4bda8b2e82f38c3fc04343392436bfcbb7abfae8
29109 F20101111_AAAZQM mcclister_d_Page_086.QC.jpg
7cba6f99978287859b34f0672fa28c6b
8ebca532dfb37b3eb484b7582f9aaab89f74683b
2344 F20101111_AAAZDB mcclister_d_Page_140.txt
4ac5ea31781028db3d99ae81ab9cfc42
e9dfd9bcdca08d030298cc3d23b5853f4d6160b2
F20101111_AAAYTT mcclister_d_Page_286.tif
000208247690b1800701b9d231a186b1
becc15bc1d8f91bc1155dd31c6a7743dbeafa245
F20101111_AAAXJP mcclister_d_Page_060.tif
09a54e73695244170743ffd753267a19
0adc673590d91b1aa7712bc7004da9d6fdc4dde0
107047 F20101111_AAAYGI mcclister_d_Page_175.jpg
110c7f7673b09152d0e36cbdcdbfe9e7
0a9eec37956b85fee359783e443870270fcf2784
6502 F20101111_AAAZQN mcclister_d_Page_087thm.jpg
1f24db97a9f2142681357b6618a8e125
53bbf4144be6f3f012dbe2f35db15e35107441f7
2776 F20101111_AAAZDC mcclister_d_Page_141.txt
bd7debde8c43396a07398e1d791d03dc
e63424da08e8ea3ee21f4ac306c367bc08ee2c94
F20101111_AAAYTU mcclister_d_Page_287.tif
3686faa9e28f7873642ec599b65d85ec
b059945423281cb8da16bf1ab2c282689426dd1e
6888 F20101111_AAAXJQ mcclister_d_Page_230thm.jpg
3d05135dee197b9bc3ae789abe4dd831
29140de0121c43eeb00c4e3924e2b5da618daf7c
97864 F20101111_AAAYGJ mcclister_d_Page_176.jpg
6dc58872d2b6e8d607b19f9307c409d3
612371b431c6a55fa06342dd809bae2fc21fc862
6756 F20101111_AAAZQO mcclister_d_Page_088thm.jpg
8b31e577f75e674beb7b48ad5c9c1a43
a8808aecb9335d3ed488d837ec65133c1452a3bf
2144 F20101111_AAAZDD mcclister_d_Page_142.txt
a1412cdb5caeae177260984b4af3a4d8
9b9ed2ce9172fb90990b81358cbcced40a0091c4
F20101111_AAAYTV mcclister_d_Page_288.tif
56209bdba86baa6b9e59b1fc838b443d
63021468f48285d25064c5c654ffe22369045cdf
28087 F20101111_AAAXJR mcclister_d_Page_274.QC.jpg
82e150c18d9dab01c1b4410356fd45ff
144ebb8221f7c6de4f330ee63aa06d740ae357c9
90913 F20101111_AAAYGK mcclister_d_Page_177.jpg
c2e1adb6138cd4c0bed800beeac40d00
d6d731c4ff57b0f5e0160a8c670c40a280121dcd
6939 F20101111_AAAZQP mcclister_d_Page_091thm.jpg
80b43753d2fd9142ed43449673fd5ba8
a9c2c080a8a3ca179741a8fd906ac8febbb6e134
F20101111_AAAZDE mcclister_d_Page_144.txt
96bfcc901e1910760541936fd45854f3
d4954fdc88604da2314cdc8dd19ea406b9841d4f
F20101111_AAAYTW mcclister_d_Page_290.tif
cef65cb59e7849acc887d35e94aabdcc
e443b2761da2e2347c731115254cbf92768b24c4
87496 F20101111_AAAXJS mcclister_d_Page_050.jpg
d48f8fbf02d20dec2cd3a8bf70c7850c
f40df6ce86d761b0fb5557f0705cb57f250cec91
94780 F20101111_AAAYGL mcclister_d_Page_179.jpg
aa935179408b623fe40b970154905280
34ca0622922935af5d6664907e887333dfa8c271
6849 F20101111_AAAZQQ mcclister_d_Page_094thm.jpg
d6837963e4e99d6ec77563723fa0d5c6
b36d815b4daebfbda7355d9395e88d03ae9672a7
F20101111_AAAZDF mcclister_d_Page_145.txt
4211d413c32466f94e8e5c857fa96c71
2c2fbd87156c5b3f1bac3ef18fd9fa20114ed4c5
F20101111_AAAYTX mcclister_d_Page_297.tif
db75e12755d9274b6a0000a66feedcbe
19a11dbdc59997ff1c6c4fd63b8f7e03606a5359
28987 F20101111_AAAXJT mcclister_d_Page_217.QC.jpg
ff87ccb2a73f92bea5a87aeafefd3a02
2e0d8b384ad81687fc8976d58c70fa9b7ddea430
87652 F20101111_AAAYGM mcclister_d_Page_182.jpg
fc0036c1fa376b306e83825cc4738bf5
17383bb6eb3817ff7d7a223ac93a2a817fe7189e
6924 F20101111_AAAZQR mcclister_d_Page_099thm.jpg
75e5f54c80b179fa23f9d346e7722811
516e159ad690aa43c18ba5bfe4c0be01ad403605
1204 F20101111_AAAZDG mcclister_d_Page_146.txt
c9e15b9a91ca593d91ddf207f6b78fa4
31206477d093804297e306cebbf9439b165c8dee
864 F20101111_AAAYTY mcclister_d_Page_002.pro
7ed920c602eb372bdc2cf137625dc20f
9a6ca1f4d37dbddc0ce6f78a3cdefe711e602434
80112 F20101111_AAAXJU mcclister_d_Page_153.jpg
63165fa887577aa08349fd184dea2522
3f30f6a2cfdba29bb1edb3bc53b0a042f1ae85af
102921 F20101111_AAAYGN mcclister_d_Page_183.jpg
7b33bf828d3b4bf29069a47c6e31297d
fbb3e2f39406b3891b3bc5544cafa381703edad1
29173 F20101111_AAAZQS mcclister_d_Page_100.QC.jpg
afc2544d1ae048fe2ac49335b0f2a22b
80c12ca5f57fc1e3e8d0dde059e20c94b9356ab5
2424 F20101111_AAAZDH mcclister_d_Page_147.txt
eced5921f5b125ce290159c608cc5074
52db9414d74fcbdd5aaeb3ad36b44d2167287c87
7173 F20101111_AAAYTZ mcclister_d_Page_003.pro
6f4c84ca8be86cdfac31cf62ace15863
b27c92c2dacf9445739cc9be19c0aa24c393ddfa
92872 F20101111_AAAXJV mcclister_d_Page_041.jpg
a1634a2392f9020777a382658b319b08
b9d4331d94d9c0683f19b429a452cf942a84acd6
89156 F20101111_AAAYGO mcclister_d_Page_186.jpg
f24dd9c46df7b38fd3dd52d1c21855f6
32561e59826eb83b18f2cc628f72a580bee61130
6897 F20101111_AAAZQT mcclister_d_Page_102thm.jpg
b4fc90ed9dff6e34f2bb7e9a42ed2d1b
39126fe10229d3b23a831acc5353a6c4d987265f
2259 F20101111_AAAZDI mcclister_d_Page_150.txt
328a9c0f5e8ca7956e2f28a12f6a3680
cfe8a3b3e064f7ffb4ab9707cd79207d39e91f8b
79435 F20101111_AAAYGP mcclister_d_Page_187.jpg
dafa49dd1059612893b569266792d4c6
f828cb64346f0c49dc3303a7de48b32bc31da256
31488 F20101111_AAAZQU mcclister_d_Page_103.QC.jpg
71e36b81bc3a57da83a6705c02095b3c
e7f0d36f4c293ccd1b5b7cb85f7d090f67c44f21
F20101111_AAAZDJ mcclister_d_Page_151.txt
54d1eac11dada3d5603af476772adb19
55c2a7635c70499760e554a1341bca6958e35522
29553 F20101111_AAAXJW mcclister_d_Page_031.QC.jpg
41c67a69d312452b63cee8ad2625a1ca
bafe69e31fa7270a2e25ad42fd7647d7b8e7e175
83356 F20101111_AAAYGQ mcclister_d_Page_188.jpg
2fc57257d700ccd3f15984eeda0be9ea
bf24655169ff01030738ae9dc5bb3e12c75587c5
6602 F20101111_AAAZQV mcclister_d_Page_104thm.jpg
d516f70184a36eab1ad83c0b61e73d97
9c1445d6fc3a26c76da1d2fdfa30bdab84308ca5
1914 F20101111_AAAZDK mcclister_d_Page_153.txt
6c4bfef7fd59a644c7c4af3d43fa4ebf
d5ab2f76ff8a3f130a808736e1cb2895027e3cb8
54529 F20101111_AAAXJX mcclister_d_Page_047.pro
a72b0031185894a15cac07fb336c733b
9fd350b839e53c2e55eb536adc23ebfa4a7ef1aa
99248 F20101111_AAAYGR mcclister_d_Page_191.jpg
9df0fd00c4c77ecd20de5bc38ad13afe
a6631ebdcac039635e79f3164b40792d76056011
19571 F20101111_AAAZQW mcclister_d_Page_116.QC.jpg
21aad2ffaf447870a9f87ba4cf5e333f
255edcc3b9c7d3572c94f024a93c0051d2b6f834
2361 F20101111_AAAZDL mcclister_d_Page_154.txt
32e206c447dd6231238d4525e761d8bb
43d7f3cc92f7e5ebd135748782dd67a515b18b42
67457 F20101111_AAAXJY mcclister_d_Page_101.pro
7cffd0c7b3e0a4fdbf5a8b28c3b3358c
d3e5ee02d5648c1e7e9131ba63de368212944a78
6541 F20101111_AAAZQX mcclister_d_Page_117thm.jpg
65d1b218cbb8d423bdce8cf2285dd528
6e2684c2ff278c758706f8e5bb4d89040e424878
2121 F20101111_AAAZDM mcclister_d_Page_156.txt
4adb6fbac224a8c1958c1824758c4a76
591cf350cc6b54d639e0d49f21b457c005f18d90
2032 F20101111_AAAXJZ mcclister_d_Page_159.txt
c1b782f176e218e29b9a97c1e734217e
547eeb749de1c5e32d10b88a52c7e7e57b7bbdba
88699 F20101111_AAAYGS mcclister_d_Page_192.jpg
25f87eed4290310956dca1ecaa720bd1
9b92515cc96fbf3cf5dbdecbfd6ff371d494be73
6740 F20101111_AAAZQY mcclister_d_Page_124thm.jpg
1a82080a31ba84832d2594dfdfeb9bf5
9a36e0f4ef250c0b669f5f3a04337e97b970a211
F20101111_AAAZDN mcclister_d_Page_165.txt
7a4064b8e4627aba5b35ec3cd6f8c23c
6511920d012bf756d53d29f950dc1702fe626fa2
90102 F20101111_AAAYGT mcclister_d_Page_194.jpg
7e7b9f7f7690fef7d3ffe5ed4e3c706a
64bf1d1269e2af22ebcf5eee90b9428dcfc648e6
6656 F20101111_AAAZQZ mcclister_d_Page_125thm.jpg
be88b4f1daea7703d8d481f744fb7b8c
3b4ab27245f9ca88084654359a96dbb23d92dd8b
119235 F20101111_AAAWSA mcclister_d_Page_041.jp2
8ed35903e4c4552a284b3b5f8d4e2e07
87d7ee1a45adcdbda738fc8d9724f8681d90e00c
87434 F20101111_AAAYGU mcclister_d_Page_197.jpg
b84458ba9c6e2e26b2cf0767b43308f6
a569b3ebf7db13996dfaf3c7401c6fffd757be69
2580 F20101111_AAAZDO mcclister_d_Page_167.txt
eb449bf90f2d7effd3163f17f000781c
8cf81eb2b741bbad7efef3f0f789a39f27fe84f8
F20101111_AAAWSB mcclister_d_Page_177.txt
9849971ee3d730403ca2c97bcdfc8c24
21faffadbb2f425d4a3524dfa2612564587eb7e2
93029 F20101111_AAAYGV mcclister_d_Page_198.jpg
346a8411033c21bf71433e45cd2233a5
5b0588c8795bdefbeb8d37160cf16a7285105ef4
52727 F20101111_AAAYZA mcclister_d_Page_237.pro
2cc5cfdf4ac22b51433c7404f0fed706
353a4c5df0d8edb81a112663130323cfc7d1a9c9
2236 F20101111_AAAZDP mcclister_d_Page_169.txt
ac6a5635fd4b2aaa8303588c3fecda90
31bd0e60aea9575f0bb73b2533dedfcd6c87db19
F20101111_AAAWSC mcclister_d_Page_137.tif
d2e93ed6df4cad03be602627e93d753e
70bf145de6c4cd73c6c8fdb47c78a232e2606003
93999 F20101111_AAAYGW mcclister_d_Page_199.jpg
590a9452c8955b4468564bc95871e951
839fb43f0105b088a20a90393110ac6cc02e5aa2
37865 F20101111_AAAYZB mcclister_d_Page_238.pro
fd6ef9ce5e24b7ddea48d1467201e5bd
cf6d61b65b3d67162345af32dcae8ccb48f405f9
2252 F20101111_AAAZDQ mcclister_d_Page_174.txt
6436560f7aaafac9804d222c84d362c9
c1e7214b6caaba09f111868ebe067afb0b39b67f
6730 F20101111_AAAWSD mcclister_d_Page_127thm.jpg
ca1cc6053eb9d8b3d1a624885a894dd0
2e028d466e259d94474195cab3ca7834ff8b0ede
89090 F20101111_AAAYGX mcclister_d_Page_200.jpg
a2ee71437d98ccae72a4c63e21b2c4c0
9221689d66898b5652d9dd75fe0fe72e1a65bd32
55182 F20101111_AAAYZC mcclister_d_Page_241.pro
6c1cb7f0aa3e9c34b4a0389fb58d3f4f
8171fd0e7038c0ed1d7fe0537994f7fabe71b198
2801 F20101111_AAAZDR mcclister_d_Page_175.txt
50f0160e7dadd5c2fe792694c8b6dae6
7bad910355f5b0019cb0fee5186dacb796451ba4
105429 F20101111_AAAWSE mcclister_d_Page_101.jpg
eff845031a1d36dbb9c77e4444514c8d
48f64b8830f665c93d02f0ffdb5d68c9c92a8cd3
101512 F20101111_AAAYGY mcclister_d_Page_201.jpg
6f6698c1d1867464fdd452022aeb8033
d5303776703d8ebaa006bb5207c0d931a4de2d1d
57723 F20101111_AAAYZD mcclister_d_Page_242.pro
8e7e85c2beb672bc517ce6645eb98c1b
5980c6f71b0b4ebda63f649a0057df4931d7ae6e
F20101111_AAAZDS mcclister_d_Page_176.txt
ebafafda16ef166238800d33657ce3c1
f5f920bc29f695ed8df0f3bfb9393f39ffe5f8d0
63431 F20101111_AAAWSF mcclister_d_Page_129.pro
41738bde58d761dd617780be3d25aeaa
46cca514aee9bc318bb8e16aef07e2c0388822c7
104755 F20101111_AAAYGZ mcclister_d_Page_202.jpg
c397a502f45bbe707280631f19661d19
5793fa56929e4fe97505d3a2ef22b522ebc2cd0e
55762 F20101111_AAAYZE mcclister_d_Page_243.pro
9b5a84785b1286d1fbe77aedfd10d725
9d0f191e9b1a14de06fd6e92965f5084e18ce8f0
2634 F20101111_AAAZDT mcclister_d_Page_183.txt
1bad142c98464c3791d189d68a00898e
f4e2aa4119321a4ce3b34832c0c61600a6022784
69528 F20101111_AAAWSG mcclister_d_Page_046.jpg
57f948db0b6408fd0287076bd3ea575b
4e3c1f20c14e0d8f2c81bb8871dee8e92c9912a2
F20101111_AAAZDU mcclister_d_Page_184.txt
cc9b4d7e11df99ee2d1ac3ae3a2a51ac
3044cb82f065a7a475dbfc04554426f980e55a01
3063 F20101111_AAAWSH mcclister_d_Page_010.txt
481bb3239947193a9cd2c44846204a88
6eff27fdb79b5a20318d8f2b6f5124974185f732
91854 F20101111_AAAXPA mcclister_d_Page_088.jpg
49e91f162870eff20b0294ef5b0b4932
7596076dad45e6a123001f4ee937f2eea3fa70b4
50217 F20101111_AAAYZF mcclister_d_Page_246.pro
b399d226ea6cce1850075de9504fa406
35c54cff334e23c8c39ba32c934a2106ed2039a0
2346 F20101111_AAAZDV mcclister_d_Page_185.txt
9479436b3f7fdf4c87fb211fc866ca54
b5cda80f172373a643b1d06e6c7d89b640cfe14b
133199 F20101111_AAAWSI mcclister_d_Page_219.jp2
ca4e203d548b2dec48f331ac7d6f6c6c
0e309452f6fc96916e38f8ae9a06dbf7d8cd06f9
131392 F20101111_AAAXPB mcclister_d_Page_129.jp2
56918d98b4ee6c2937ab52c4d36f26dc
98d929a51f8304901db4aee39dcbebd25a5c9762
2166 F20101111_AAAZDW mcclister_d_Page_186.txt
7928a3622d2505716ab84bfb48a139ca
968d300702d5a716a0fbe090a70a6e73679504bf
50542 F20101111_AAAYZG mcclister_d_Page_249.pro
ea73bf3b144faab34422ba7d694091a9
1e8f2f55f0472a6d0655d308356f9b6493400559
F20101111_AAAWSJ mcclister_d_Page_027.tif
2bde9e8aeb1856fda2c87255b7b6e0b3
0326062157f96673d1e4858f392709cef028dbe7
53105 F20101111_AAAXPC mcclister_d_Page_182.pro
587c76a7a81d1b798e5fff0bd245772f
cb89da3d5e341b60df53b830577ad1696463cacc
1902 F20101111_AAAZDX mcclister_d_Page_187.txt
06e7c34195aeb3ec3a2f4c977c4fdb3e
5e75a08cebd2af333657a7ac082d526bb0d0e701
52064 F20101111_AAAYZH mcclister_d_Page_250.pro
1a7636ff9d20cc05936f3d0796737775
e72a9b5b2948b0816def636bc403b11b1d1960f3
27549 F20101111_AAAWSK mcclister_d_Page_135.QC.jpg
3bebf850f18633fe4dc24c2eb8a0f5ce
dcf325e1b10c1a2199e6a7d2cecc362ae741ac2c
29691 F20101111_AAAXPD mcclister_d_Page_101.QC.jpg
81f73b399553149f8c9062df46086614
3ffa0596a5699b88a60d93a01022b46df4d93a84
2969 F20101111_AAAZDY mcclister_d_Page_189.txt
014e58f8c93630f9fddec35f162f4345
1191f5f5bae1bf212ae108d9d5deb80b91cd7873
64490 F20101111_AAAYZI mcclister_d_Page_255.pro
be25c10b1f44da8e3d5f66205e620a61
dc0bb218a3d376e949dc3273803f84e55ceca1b6
16287 F20101111_AAAWSL mcclister_d_Page_267.jpg
a790a7f1ea258db4770ffda043d3e818
63a53b475c3dc3fdb436a38889cc272dc9262977
95437 F20101111_AAAXPE mcclister_d_Page_264.jpg
71460b77f42ba3e7c0143be1da4f3f31
e97f1d8f02af70937cf2ee6384cc20bc079cd37c
2380 F20101111_AAAZDZ mcclister_d_Page_190.txt
16262ea98bf47fd4b6b652c2cf4b4e97
1424ad69afc9d431b24213ac8c669c542106379b
57422 F20101111_AAAYZJ mcclister_d_Page_259.pro
22564466a1207afbcf3303862c2e5640
97ddf1fd7edd4b78318b36e3840212d82da614e6
F20101111_AAAWSM mcclister_d_Page_230.tif
bd93cfa59d87614e30a87536370ffe1d
396d479ffc13fe9506ea48c7b777f715f06eadc8
55831 F20101111_AAAXPF mcclister_d_Page_172.pro
1b4b5f52758224cf0e59e3c4f8ee730a
df5f490bf5a75f3c8768a24f8847ff344adf6a73
59884 F20101111_AAAYZK mcclister_d_Page_262.pro
27a574e3f7db94438d7e51175d114585
af2f954f6759d00dac4d0b670b5f91faebc9f075
F20101111_AAAWSN mcclister_d_Page_084thm.jpg
1c217b545ce9c873ee8d320ce9604b70
9b4c690f5d7b4f65c0f73261f342a6c0f316d666
2142 F20101111_AAAXPG mcclister_d_Page_117.txt
b4e364f6f85ca30d33fe640a1abacd99
1871967119f89415c3aa7e0e3977f0390110cdd4
63258 F20101111_AAAYZL mcclister_d_Page_263.pro
682f698097f3f3539b6885fa33d18481
c5cf6e535190647af74efd3566be714b44d3ea84
F20101111_AAAWSO mcclister_d_Page_084.tif
b999f12151938ec285f1960f9f9b719a
1632c184b8af236962981dd1ffb5cd8337d06cf0
6971 F20101111_AAAXPH mcclister_d_Page_167thm.jpg
a448af6407b077de58810234d89cca47
2f35af3a17b15e77469bb69513069ae1d799591f
147841 F20101111_AAAYMA mcclister_d_Page_189.jp2
48cfac8d705560716cbb87ccb3b2742d
1a470a0dd534493933f17537e20c925ada9b50d8
59095 F20101111_AAAYZM mcclister_d_Page_266.pro
ccc3d91c606c38beecdfa29fad57119d
cb54a4209eadbdd8667d29ee3093b0ddea4363d4
42377 F20101111_AAAWSP mcclister_d_Page_046.pro
d2526c5037b7a18170c0789d277a6c44
30b33eb9df6bb6fab493642b6467ade0bbbe788e
30249 F20101111_AAAXPI mcclister_d_Page_014.QC.jpg
6c80a4e28400dbb5cea6aabd610fd596
d3e2a8fc75c286bc4391fa96a65c84d8e497823f
124906 F20101111_AAAYMB mcclister_d_Page_190.jp2
ebfb5278f80335c4f9cf145c85750979
3f5b5d6b5715ba83c2176fb02f152ce0aaa45e0d
8291 F20101111_AAAYZN mcclister_d_Page_267.pro
68071b4d6ef752b15ca3ee8e82165409
f9d980c47de9c44c71785d79556cbd9654538564
28782 F20101111_AAAWSQ mcclister_d_Page_216.QC.jpg
d00551aa03bc4542155c09f3be68f7a0
16919ea81a84dd104cdd0a2c23e17e82e288ef5d
58990 F20101111_AAAXPJ mcclister_d_Page_245.pro
087cb4b22cd9622ae2319fb5e61cf6e7
4f061a700f8ce3df4fce117796b38d0dc6101266
115785 F20101111_AAAYMC mcclister_d_Page_192.jp2
5bb12dfc0f8d12d22fb1cc504b27fd4a
7a106e3a83ea3e2182760a85d73e29b60c912246
56510 F20101111_AAAYZO mcclister_d_Page_269.pro
51c8f85216b56fcbd42bf25d28a10b4c
2ecb70122b02797609c62f3349249ae8317cd07c
6869 F20101111_AAAWSR mcclister_d_Page_129thm.jpg
84ab6fd964f5ae0fbc4a5cbd256ac19d
52b44b946db7a7d83d218dd83ebca757429e643b
86935 F20101111_AAAXPK mcclister_d_Page_212.jpg
307712379c35b13e43de186ca79c6222
4222c3b43d20498bc55a89b15543889bd5d2d999
130395 F20101111_AAAYMD mcclister_d_Page_195.jp2
744b4a98b29d50ad1989b2940198c8d6
9ee2c6e3b24a7bb134db4a148ce38046515e05fe
2195 F20101111_AAAXCA mcclister_d_Page_243.txt
dc2d635dc7e6c8309cfc55c03b3a522d
abd589fc911f945d5f401db0b46b827d9d62e92b
54789 F20101111_AAAYZP mcclister_d_Page_270.pro
e4c2a0ccfaac3679530dc3bdab407d21
24773884312248a29a1d815b66d4db438636a10f
133011 F20101111_AAAWSS mcclister_d_Page_280.jp2
3eb47684ab7901c600a3925f3d2da2ef
1eab50ba422dcc75f1e4163140af9e9650a99c5b
66827 F20101111_AAAXPL mcclister_d_Page_131.pro
e743723d78b37fbcb22941969cb31635
0b4be829014dcc1615fd78e081199c36a62c9503
120084 F20101111_AAAYME mcclister_d_Page_198.jp2
984c7f584209c4e680b8a3dff260d8be
a713364f3bd3de5eb34fdbfc4aa732b1dd6c0d31
5843 F20101111_AAAXCB mcclister_d_Page_162thm.jpg
b2ade1c3df7e15b097424aee916d9806
7b35c91eb334ed0b24b447af72e7229977058e56
55884 F20101111_AAAYZQ mcclister_d_Page_272.pro
00ca599a980cf945e938ba844086651c
b3f45bd4e99f9b2ecc760c68789f51bc01fae429
6675 F20101111_AAAWST mcclister_d_Page_026thm.jpg
9c7f406a4f0fc10d23936917e2b58d99
5edbdc52a8d4dbc9b8f4a49437bdaea6b6fdc10e
6723 F20101111_AAAXPM mcclister_d_Page_157thm.jpg
367998ec316f882cd8ceb6713abf357a
962a73110bef4840b659cb51a6399a5829d989f2
122222 F20101111_AAAYMF mcclister_d_Page_199.jp2
653d5783ce9e4a079d168fd3a2196cc2
739efd145bbe54e6294139c423f85b9e88497858
118258 F20101111_AAAXCC mcclister_d_Page_148.jp2
4e1359ec14e184514b0bdd8f65b3850c
5735a008606f614a02e9ed26de3e23f04f28967b
54917 F20101111_AAAYZR mcclister_d_Page_274.pro
b9b06ea3ba6f3e8c42fcdf0e70f4fd58
839cd4dd4cb4efff46249fda821aceadcfc5aeae
51892 F20101111_AAAWSU mcclister_d_Page_093.pro
26b61be5a80e4926b4ac84809c1e0558
bae6df1c42e34c01ad7b8b844343bfa9bf9623eb
118977 F20101111_AAAXPN mcclister_d_Page_243.jp2
2d025e56a9d9d0e9138a0f6a9ead542e
c5b1074f334050cf4d3e845161c3e8d970edfad7
116005 F20101111_AAAYMG mcclister_d_Page_200.jp2
213dfe2591aae8b84ff959467d189760
6a7cc66b662f514fe4767c8606e0566b45ae3118
25882 F20101111_AAAZJA mcclister_d_Page_019.QC.jpg
c8446c780787eccb2ecc17efe6fe9157
17a3bf7285bdecabf28694ffe17dc75d4617311d
55395 F20101111_AAAXCD mcclister_d_Page_022.pro
66c0acb751bb2ccfe3b602a6a17738cb
ad6d66c9429a8816765728d023ff98c8761056d7
55934 F20101111_AAAYZS mcclister_d_Page_277.pro
ff7efe9f476fa8b7325572216725568a
5ebe6b25f8fef332a896e7fe5df4c2d87748cd39
58310 F20101111_AAAWSV mcclister_d_Page_048.pro
b5429b0429cf48286a999845f6abfa63
4d89a4be30258af0d8a02c41d8e954bf3dc781a7
66678 F20101111_AAAXPO mcclister_d_Page_040.pro
ddc6f12b5853a8c7fca50412c7f667a9
385b6920139ecdfa2422061094d6f170fe52b683
133946 F20101111_AAAYMH mcclister_d_Page_201.jp2
8be9602b604383f90178bc6103bf1c8d
ff5139517763252da3cbaca106a655d8f2d072bc
6990 F20101111_AAAZJB mcclister_d_Page_058thm.jpg
b20c8c589d5fbe42c7b173f405fd5ca9
ab2b4cb9ddb52d4dd44807e6edcb63e0c8d520ad
F20101111_AAAXCE mcclister_d_Page_187.tif
49db23bbfa43fdf28f0e522921d8e3fa
b33bffe042036b974c7663da440c69c4fe2c0b3d
F20101111_AAAYZT mcclister_d_Page_281.pro
add24384c84f3bab9970118238a0e51b
a9f060eadf9759185c39c05bfbe521f5748d59fa
F20101111_AAAWSW mcclister_d_Page_233.tif
6d8eb79a8b39377920ad106fb1825314
c5f15b5df567340dd61276c53524274e5bae16d4
F20101111_AAAXPP mcclister_d_Page_042.tif
7dab66255851aefbd0c40353b4807bb8
1587ffeae54e7c2b26615a74e2061d74da84c035
1051977 F20101111_AAAYMI mcclister_d_Page_202.jp2
c19dd15680ae62da51674dbce74b9e2c
47229f3207c01ac0fb181a72f6a553fc3dbc63cb
29228 F20101111_AAAZJC mcclister_d_Page_273.QC.jpg
eef91f88c4c84756a952fd40a7d3a6f6
db6d3931c6c6dcf4a9d196264f9ce62394ff94b6
88887 F20101111_AAAXCF mcclister_d_Page_265.jpg
3439d1e7b96c524696627337ae6902f4
6ff2746bb19db483df23720346f82635d7cc9437
56435 F20101111_AAAYZU mcclister_d_Page_282.pro
d4107c90aa9b6ed933d692cb63013804
a3138ae7a137b4152663dc26794776797dcc8cca
F20101111_AAAWSX mcclister_d_Page_292.tif
bde9c5c342af09db8b9cbcd9ad45c4f3
6aca92fcfddd5482acf2524ad7162eb77b9120b0
28326 F20101111_AAAXPQ mcclister_d_Page_256.QC.jpg
d010abf3c20508eadd688e91e7e2c27d
a70e93006389b0f9dd947b28dc7cfd341bf87690
102857 F20101111_AAAYMJ mcclister_d_Page_204.jp2
f135c748f0b0f2b7c3a134360392dbb5
841c2936471483b0108cde37f4d7bdc7eac2fbc3
24776 F20101111_AAAZJD mcclister_d_Page_203.QC.jpg
5ac4e76716d0402201f42e2a4ed1e17a
8431a3ce441bff695280a58a8862d947f7aa275d
F20101111_AAAXCG mcclister_d_Page_110.tif
95d0dc7e93b7dc41639404ad5100ac80
8a0fe949e9c88ae3c7a3de883dd3412b0bacd593
53959 F20101111_AAAYZV mcclister_d_Page_284.pro
bd967bdb4efd53491cecd798baaa6a3c
49780f7b0b7d016ef81b185d4eaa4504e2454c7e
59097 F20101111_AAAWSY mcclister_d_Page_136.pro
6171917ef088756e50d308b5f1b83a50
f8c4fbfdc0f99a0d95ab3e79e9f8aca1d570cd37
113560 F20101111_AAAXPR mcclister_d_Page_036.jp2
f41958514eaedcd4cdaea73ed6033083
39d95e09f20b6d87d64f189dae035dbc7ec43973
121217 F20101111_AAAYMK mcclister_d_Page_208.jp2
93eb092a79d9496f55c0734f90750b56
29f78121c1afc4fbec61674e0f170432f374908c
6024 F20101111_AAAZJE mcclister_d_Page_203thm.jpg
37220484b6400044706ccf23404a6fff
79cde8c87ba741e70f63e2a8b8c588030cbe818f
F20101111_AAAXCH mcclister_d_Page_055.tif
cf55eb64f5d39ec3b59342aaacea9419
3a7429f1f9b5b451ecd558aebd13b425ef9332f7
61788 F20101111_AAAYZW mcclister_d_Page_286.pro
0430304d83daae8e6e4b0a16cb4f8c70
3abc10a14250b74d99292eccd9766beb52dd0441
6851 F20101111_AAAWSZ mcclister_d_Page_175thm.jpg
0e4ce9a48f20b5fb307dabf5fd4248c3
fd3f578ca9dcc13ba96f970b79946b8081781cbb
29660 F20101111_AAAXPS mcclister_d_Page_161.QC.jpg
7c62a2b77726bc5b8f64b5b28f853a04
d7c9624e257c387b689c8c5c7457bede7439fa26
124209 F20101111_AAAYML mcclister_d_Page_211.jp2
20279ecaa6b0a9f3b8fef5477778fde1
72bf747f567ad7801d3e6acca7a0e3ad2ac08295
7038 F20101111_AAAZJF mcclister_d_Page_242thm.jpg
a5db921b53cf90b57d69b66c1d26abbf
85440c8b5dc531cac27bd7df81fdf98e3e8c2207
85641 F20101111_AAAXCI mcclister_d_Page_250.jpg
6355774e76c34bb9bdf416c77cecc7eb
e0f3e618cf93b8e113375fa9cd2f81ef53b4a48e
66378 F20101111_AAAYZX mcclister_d_Page_287.pro
341f29b7d23c9978183f007754633d3b
3c91df799bb939b2116bc3505d52a14bb269af4c
29092 F20101111_AAAXPT mcclister_d_Page_140.QC.jpg
05c7d66516cc4bb84e9b120adece57dc
5e703ab9c41e0b5c059188994fd0ef077216b86d
117191 F20101111_AAAYMM mcclister_d_Page_213.jp2
5b785b54001b8c412fb760e52c62dee7
a11943790a614e73532aa9acba301ff058ef3e8c
6963 F20101111_AAAZJG mcclister_d_Page_209thm.jpg
b62f5828e9c4f08625856e763fcbbe16
81d559b0421d4dd0e7e8e5c2b2de9a3d9f94b087
F20101111_AAAXCJ mcclister_d_Page_025thm.jpg
02f3fb3ee3d780e6a15a09cc0c740163
73a989cb0aa45f74ea68b672d1db14700e817088
65073 F20101111_AAAYZY mcclister_d_Page_289.pro
906df4738d7516d2f25ea6eca9a46289
ad6f77cc59f102932484d1e747f4fd1347410e0c
96961 F20101111_AAAXPU mcclister_d_Page_094.jpg
3026b48631e4832b862e4648df5bbe38
a48a4c60e240238d739b7670efab2c878c2f9316
104838 F20101111_AAAYMN mcclister_d_Page_215.jp2
9a3cfaff2c1caa3e119c91013a455b0d
bc55ca7e6a330161c17bc05dfed984d81a63bb32
6879 F20101111_AAAZJH mcclister_d_Page_243thm.jpg
0213bc510fe82b411d4e8a6dd625e577
3eb09b482e0c5e91bef2f4976ed23e61dd633f6e
56054 F20101111_AAAXCK mcclister_d_Page_060.pro
eeaa7c04f32aa105980109c39c1d8ab7
91c44260041186b259e043b2ed4575e3c8effa56
59369 F20101111_AAAYZZ mcclister_d_Page_295.pro
0e32ba276cf502a5ea4967d5c9613d6d
d535eb91549e4572159c391d18690fd2bbb5721d
F20101111_AAAXPV mcclister_d_Page_271.tif
3c01ecf472e2bd875898fe2287e213f9
2e8d54937ab867a14e8d9605efd0631b4c057be3
120770 F20101111_AAAYMO mcclister_d_Page_217.jp2
f5b39e740d0387b525b72e61e3a8eb55
d523a58a08965db76f66ddd9df13afc8ce0bf001
4606 F20101111_AAAZJI mcclister_d_Page_116thm.jpg
26103034bdeb7c8478262be63611f840
050d475c42e0c33af31c28438587b47e89445341
122610 F20101111_AAAXCL mcclister_d_Page_127.jp2
60e1b92ef86008c2ab9d993fc1f6372b
cfbc452fee48460eedcc1a0f5a589b7f37eb6b17
6727 F20101111_AAAXPW mcclister_d_Page_060thm.jpg
4a60e3f16b5058e8e86d917c566cdf53
c487d4bee2d47f06a81e9084d907cdf562c110af
121542 F20101111_AAAYMP mcclister_d_Page_218.jp2
decc1c0905e912ce39e3c0aad0b654f2
b67ac65b03a302bffaff120781a51bf304f3cd37
6803 F20101111_AAAZJJ mcclister_d_Page_148thm.jpg
79c0459273651b3da2e89d1bfd1bca91
712d25d4b0b9741968769734dd0be260824d48fe
F20101111_AAAXCM mcclister_d_Page_178.txt
9886c84d182469348db41da02f6b10b4
23b8e5e57391ed93c8d3dbb0c65089208ca99ea9
28112 F20101111_AAAXPX mcclister_d_Page_227.QC.jpg
74e514201b1a8b345af4eba29d7f58ff
e48c53baed25ef24ff07d6372932a4b61efea26c
117482 F20101111_AAAYMQ mcclister_d_Page_220.jp2
8285acc66a67a377ec02ba97cca4e7d0
41a5919bdbbe3b0f822e3b567c37bb74e1aa75d6
23720 F20101111_AAAZJK mcclister_d_Page_007.QC.jpg
965bde6f269970c7c342464759a3dda5
de7e5182fd9ffc5e93d3a5dda8acec8e84cce976
54187 F20101111_AAAXCN mcclister_d_Page_265.pro
86d99160e0b89d5b8242242335de4fa7
a73c9c7c3ba3ed49a360ed045aefcdf24d6e8738
113763 F20101111_AAAXPY mcclister_d_Page_156.jp2
b5e15c3eaff2d6f9bbd75dca5ac760e9
1d2547fd6f2e81e2285fca4ceb06a0516c6748c4
115617 F20101111_AAAYMR mcclister_d_Page_223.jp2
206e57bda80f8702ef4fc6da16c8ac0d
e7bee9438bdacd155c048693229d4168c9cea075
6357 F20101111_AAAZJL mcclister_d_Page_052thm.jpg
8609315199a464e4049f0e3f85d41dd4
95eda8b99b174540f463f82f50471266e85eccbb
99116 F20101111_AAAXCO mcclister_d_Page_064.jpg
4a903948c22fdad808f226e5200eaded
0a55f5d60275c1d3e54dfd56cdec80d2ebb81ea7
F20101111_AAAXPZ mcclister_d_Page_160.tif
f381a34fd1ce2391cb2c241d6ca31694
e8cd8014f89de235d877489d50667610099c4038
114460 F20101111_AAAYMS mcclister_d_Page_225.jp2
28572986096c34f2ff743bb0b04605b7
b9a718aed45a68fe979ee750b05f14ddc98f7ff4
5182 F20101111_AAAZJM mcclister_d_Page_046thm.jpg
6b08617896e9e489d18820af27312f4c
9304250e70b0ee070e00a54112158b378fdc382f
118763 F20101111_AAAYMT mcclister_d_Page_226.jp2
66b57af3a611891d1c334e26dd2017ff
855871109b339e5ec002a7bf56ceba7a5a47f5bd
28925 F20101111_AAAZJN mcclister_d_Page_196.QC.jpg
8c49ed8e8086834114bb158796939970
3bb2f3dc4953d7cb52e5ac367add19a011ff091b
104497 F20101111_AAAXCP mcclister_d_Page_166.jpg
14cb1cb4ce68df8cd27b72b0348db861
f5b3fed85774bbd4c8b2eebd9402d562b14586d4
115649 F20101111_AAAYMU mcclister_d_Page_227.jp2
5c22c9ceeb8ba746b8f37f6f5f244cda
e94e51a195fc6d843a4b37552ce396570c187652
1977 F20101111_AAAWYA mcclister_d_Page_215.txt
c060a5fdd4e608646b5606cfdb8bcbbe
bbbb7e80dcd5090cd00eae6e9455b1056e7e1260
6947 F20101111_AAAZJO mcclister_d_Page_154thm.jpg
9de97e35e4d9b19c6352f87ea0e00890
90aebc8e324d267dfd34631a178b768a3f5e7083
115024 F20101111_AAAXCQ mcclister_d_Page_231.jp2
c348116440441ed7bc86e532e8d7ab4c
081c64cd02033d1cbea49d49abcaa943a2c7ec3e
111503 F20101111_AAAYMV mcclister_d_Page_228.jp2
840256427fcaa44385534b04d81e3d19
2c7f7396b4ea438388d27cf3f1c54afcdb04e0a3
60673 F20101111_AAAWYB mcclister_d_Page_190.pro
dad0c01b95c15a26b10e900df5564c7d
3ac4070e8daa14c1d0211a4f13460c7107f09974
29141 F20101111_AAAZJP mcclister_d_Page_280.QC.jpg
4a19293cc13eaa227423956357271c61
70fe0f6cfd492a9c59a4661d387ee7680d8eaf05
121908 F20101111_AAAYMW mcclister_d_Page_230.jp2
138c64615863c56a66028a816fac2b99
a73a20ec19077eff5f5a569ce8bb660f263ca96b
F20101111_AAAWYC mcclister_d_Page_017.tif
6411b3d5c0e2b1f92c0c120ef41e73df
8e42c06ef1d0866bd08868511a2f3cda4400b103
148427 F20101111_AAAXCR mcclister_d_Page_023.jp2
c42caff10adfa55434ff72bfc1993834
511abaa0803f971439e495072fb6b0d53e07fc96
6685 F20101111_AAAZJQ mcclister_d_Page_051thm.jpg
4ef35ee2daaf394d328c9ec9dbd72fc2
d07734727589c4bc31108012b0234144caf0c87c
118104 F20101111_AAAYMX mcclister_d_Page_233.jp2
76e62c4ce038554a8ef3e8ef459d0576
ccbcc42d908c82ccdbdaefebacc3d5db694e8603
46613 F20101111_AAAWYD mcclister_d_Page_180.jpg
3829b8b96af12f1d178b4b075972d17c
ad50c1af517353a105c3755d322dcf589f35cf7c
137436 F20101111_AAAXCS mcclister_d_Page_134.jp2
53ea7a73b85ed127e25585cf0cc743d4
50c2b6194b181e6d16b8ee7e78dae4b4b15824ac
29303 F20101111_AAAZJR mcclister_d_Page_257.QC.jpg
df6c7ff6526a9f117e6432baf0f1c0dc
bfe2421d436bb2acf4c70d44fe865144f4119d92
7041 F20101111_AAAWYE mcclister_d_Page_112thm.jpg
17c4c0a56d9b010e5b06146ed8ea44fe
3146eb7d7cccbefac6093c2d5c3a593fa0644244
F20101111_AAAXCT mcclister_d_Page_291.tif
6e54508a193f07e69a149fcc8bd9c74d
68b6c669ed0f9a9d922e1c1d5b3ac3283f169276
29206 F20101111_AAAZJS mcclister_d_Page_150.QC.jpg
551b2d5d000855fec9263e114ba3b018
fc94ec40d7a7bda782a1209a85d88851d062f919
84656 F20101111_AAAYMY mcclister_d_Page_238.jp2
4c49e2d56ef32cb69a11747b7bba21a6
890b59426a4870c912360d97246d3fa6a9ce58fb
142088 F20101111_AAAWYF mcclister_d_Page_161.jp2
50d8de4f1162f5ff7319bb07b2236744
f588367dcabe78aaf841617ebb65c2fd11f0130f
113947 F20101111_AAAXCU mcclister_d_Page_244.jp2
dd210b941fbb84d032f74feba374454a
7246cc0444eb8fd7e714a460ac10cf6d82e2b435
6773 F20101111_AAAZJT mcclister_d_Page_259thm.jpg
da1d2559e4c62f7439b8fa0a4d468bc3
c9af699c43168de8cedd84216ce06c41f5b4fcb5
116012 F20101111_AAAYMZ mcclister_d_Page_240.jp2
d57de261abe197b3719962844b1aa428
ecdfb0cf10836b07b51ce676adff13ee8881bf16
91737 F20101111_AAAXCV mcclister_d_Page_024.jpg
215c4ceb82bce6b0b704ca584037a259
d84ce89456d81d57b99254ba815aed6f5ae5eb05
116432 F20101111_AAAXVA mcclister_d_Page_210.jp2
8038ed61600fa6bb5444b8df6185ba1b
a8e3efccb2c64c8615d71890d6f38273c9687f27
65611 F20101111_AAAWYG mcclister_d_Page_027.pro
042f648e57848a8d5e50f5edf9100fde
7f47f916b1de9076e23e39bc91c786e5ff1fceae
2400 F20101111_AAAXCW mcclister_d_Page_295.txt
9469cf2df21450b8ae4fb223249a95c9
67c7fda170bf6a72cfcf05578f9bb6fc58119d85
5531 F20101111_AAAZJU mcclister_d_Page_267.QC.jpg
50c6b55b31109200210e025e7caf7dea
62e0b68c4b604c83914cdf663a3b836383aee40f
137725 F20101111_AAAXVB mcclister_d_Page_040.jp2
4cf34efb89b294b63d6b715b2b3caf07
f14a043bfa9a6bcda489dd735d14f4435825a305
126400 F20101111_AAAWYH mcclister_d_Page_062.jp2
e10bd57186f70841295716d0c7c89d87
b590bf52c58aa25a712fdf598000d8f03fa61fea
87942 F20101111_AAAXCX mcclister_d_Page_036.jpg
3242a598da68feaba383b048be930c51
161b5cbbc79a66a375fb8153353eb4e6f26b3c73
6497 F20101111_AAAZJV mcclister_d_Page_155thm.jpg
33a65f49f82fcf4ebe38e8d334982906
5411371388ea962dc178b6323ffc59fafda53514
95538 F20101111_AAAWYI mcclister_d_Page_124.jpg
f273e52231707e75b4bd7d2433cc26fb
2d6779de6099a64a028e2df389ffc826a0431157
2318 F20101111_AAAXCY mcclister_d_Page_127.txt
5158e4894e6ef99c47db756caf7eb325
edc94e7f47e98edfcea47bc6fe375918e526de54
6038 F20101111_AAAZJW mcclister_d_Page_126thm.jpg
a374241f4ea32c38fbdb83f3dca78b23
645cd11167a1240d995c3796018b3a7479f7b002
F20101111_AAAXVC mcclister_d_Page_092.tif
80f36c607350b5359a719fe0a8b608cf
5f2abb7e633c9e5945dd3eaf307a81d9a30d5b0b
27836 F20101111_AAAWYJ mcclister_d_Page_033.QC.jpg
2cf2d16fcc9aa35cb5aaa42d046b7c77
42874ef0c4b801e00a2f444bd203e3a397e32443
55688 F20101111_AAAXCZ mcclister_d_Page_220.pro
7a0e61c4f9b2c8df4ff342e1f38a688a
6fe7b73c345b120dad07909698baeecbda9e8d54
3829 F20101111_AAAZJX mcclister_d_Page_146thm.jpg
cbe927e11ec3c2c264dbcc2feeb389fb
c64b804de001477fd484c57a809eb30b1255925b
110900 F20101111_AAAXVD mcclister_d_Page_021.jpg
eb9bf632023ad1964d271009dfdb2c88
92ded0c071b56cdfb27821b28c2d718f94ad550c
121301 F20101111_AAAWYK mcclister_d_Page_028.jp2
501f6985905974c1d4512b28f16427a4
3f120009de63ca3a26db7cfef9d422c560cfa05b
6902 F20101111_AAAZJY mcclister_d_Page_177thm.jpg
ef0508c30c8c17ed33548ea04c16c1ce
094f9fcfa59a4b6393344163ca6f42c419e20d7e
122842 F20101111_AAAXVE mcclister_d_Page_164.jp2
9d67b5b106030c559c9d9840705b950e
6f36cd87a7831f1b555c4ebf8b8daa04c657e163
57622 F20101111_AAAWYL mcclister_d_Page_053.pro
affe8f57a036748d410060ea8d05c5ec
077f5dd35d49b1104bd5d9136e510debce258e0f
29858 F20101111_AAAZJZ mcclister_d_Page_095.QC.jpg
bbd5bf673e43e36837013128fdc1df28
414ee3bb75eda24abdbbdb48de3e3e0b328dbae9
29664 F20101111_AAAXVF mcclister_d_Page_209.QC.jpg
aff2deb331bd7210668f0c669c170d77
7069bcecac02c6955d42f70a14b61ce9a4923a1f
6965 F20101111_AAAWYM mcclister_d_Page_184thm.jpg
a139f4140775a0df3f0c8016ec4ae60c
042c847c665c83251e272ebfa1e0cc7b701267ea
116921 F20101111_AAAXVG mcclister_d_Page_138.jp2
cb7a55dd3bec32f4a737acf2c4026af2
a922d83373167459c4a006d9f9497de0a12a401b
104011 F20101111_AAAWYN mcclister_d_Page_163.jpg
f82db6b42e43846ccf31c3d780965d55
2fbb9e3a66be6e7836208f7785cf9edcbc4afcca
125154 F20101111_AAAXVH mcclister_d_Page_253.jp2
fb7801f952b164f6187b13121667b7da
96b52deba3453ad27298a16d4d5afdc06665ebb0
F20101111_AAAYSA mcclister_d_Page_204.tif
ec12a9f3449775aeb14b72e19751acc5
3ecea4f4768bfb62cf9cae5f547b3cdb374391ea
28306 F20101111_AAAWYO mcclister_d_Page_028.QC.jpg
75a9f34de1da0510cc1528bb9aee1278
dd63ae46dedec02ed3cbfa0b8916e221ce7d6f07
51974 F20101111_AAAXVI mcclister_d_Page_168.pro
5ec4b7a0e213ce234b44fa72800a39eb
a228b7ad9c233b49cb85f8ce154f14414096f015
F20101111_AAAYSB mcclister_d_Page_205.tif
c95263b2a196d0a6890fbef54f61a3e2
60be458bd1b4655ca38281a040929678c47e9b73
6590 F20101111_AAAWYP mcclister_d_Page_241thm.jpg
626f1c661a617e86953cd1900ef911ea
d2c7e94c6bec27e05f1bf76142af77bb8e2f97bf
F20101111_AAAXVJ mcclister_d_Page_137.txt
32832da7e27a3fa126a367f577481da2
f16fe403c20c42bf36bbe1d0a0e98f50fd9629d5
F20101111_AAAYSC mcclister_d_Page_206.tif
d8c0b41186ef16cd1f5529d720c997dd
89791263134cfc3786b28baf42600530733abe46
F20101111_AAAWYQ mcclister_d_Page_262.tif
867960b5765909331883b437d72edcab
faa66357a052550f3d1ea7fb0bb0485042f631b1
27445 F20101111_AAAXVK mcclister_d_Page_158.QC.jpg
4420ee649f8d81685152195f48bc862c
2b3d851eb82c9c572e961f5455ffb447d5dbd347
F20101111_AAAYSD mcclister_d_Page_210.tif
c9ca79c368d7e3c24cef25f897b6b0e0
980803856e21888ac33ea441804faa1cbbbcf0f1
74137 F20101111_AAAWYR mcclister_d_Page_189.pro
37c0c3160122e0ed5e94817e282f3401
f16b19f0b14b01de74422889868edc66b8e5a73e
6805 F20101111_AAAXVL mcclister_d_Page_222thm.jpg
ea7e22320da29c6e617012ae97a66211
070357f851ddb3a9745ea5cbcd5d6e65450dda19
F20101111_AAAYSE mcclister_d_Page_212.tif
27b7b1042aedafb1b072ffc57813275a
3ff7a5341d633f316b82c54813708655e58b20a4
57880 F20101111_AAAXIA mcclister_d_Page_290.pro
1f7da39abe262306b4df56e08e361c4e
51a780ad952d7dd4b246e95c5954f854776f73f7
101919 F20101111_AAAWYS mcclister_d_Page_113.jpg
9d67788a1251dbe45f084918583df787
24f166a8a9eed375aee37dcc321d6f0d18274c9c
6660 F20101111_AAAXVM mcclister_d_Page_193thm.jpg
a7c355b7b0dc682601efd75843aec1e8
c75509e8f3cce868b179a41d7bb7ff2c512044c1
F20101111_AAAYSF mcclister_d_Page_213.tif
cbf79ec9b17ea7d3295d19e896e0d9c1
e7b0667d633507a449289096b9e4261dd9796a3b
F20101111_AAAXIB mcclister_d_Page_023.tif
9c8173926c9298a6ad37d0b014194ba1
a3ba5109ed982900e99b776e3b0bcb561c8ef469
2954 F20101111_AAAWYT mcclister_d_Page_023.txt
89892915621068ab8f5b393cd18bcb21
e51627cdb3f578939e70bc40ac8fb6d7c37fd6d0
89494 F20101111_AAAXVN mcclister_d_Page_239.jpg
efb2f9d2fb6faf6fd459237c7ada4f4e
d539d17bad5c244436ddc64ae2d7d0f92860a50c
F20101111_AAAYSG mcclister_d_Page_214.tif
8b742de9aae0a091dc1da61ebec24058
09b99ff35ba1ff12a61a8da25a2c547c44cf8441
2475 F20101111_AAAXIC mcclister_d_Page_195.txt
b0cfe2ff5eed5ec12efcee72396ec655
47cdcadaa5cca322fa55b7c4163f19580dd88c68
2141 F20101111_AAAWYU mcclister_d_Page_227.txt
40fe7a40fb71d8da5c0e9294f87da560
8afa6431fa918631df21a7840f44f5a97efcd969
29939 F20101111_AAAZPA mcclister_d_Page_064.QC.jpg
f6be2e219ad15918be7366d9913019f1
b556ccd4b993b061c27aeba827b7183fa05b82ac
27846 F20101111_AAAXVO mcclister_d_Page_231.QC.jpg
1b0264dea165eb515eb2c4de80336dfd
6edb10f34e38e91339bf55c9480a2e531fc092dd
F20101111_AAAYSH mcclister_d_Page_215.tif
1dd5212fbcab414cb7fe061e8f52a308
80c42039611ae2460c34644f9a832d367ff51a62
2362 F20101111_AAAXID mcclister_d_Page_290.txt
7986f828b131693224fecb0f43d1a153
247e8bf58d28f8db94466a6d5359bd2aad3b4d6f
62101 F20101111_AAAWYV mcclister_d_Page_209.pro
21a400ac949329a5dd3f6776d714541b
66939b5c95584394a64cf239d1a62087d42bb210
27970 F20101111_AAAZPB mcclister_d_Page_076.QC.jpg
484277bda7b8f44f8832aa6f3e079778
4f0318d3bea496c49cb733d5db357071b54603ac
64527 F20101111_AAAXVP mcclister_d_Page_107.pro
2bb2261acdc0c99a91b1e7238d082b2d
d2f93e31c932b53686578838a28bed81f3ae3013
F20101111_AAAYSI mcclister_d_Page_216.tif
f8720c0b766b8acd8a92f5d0adb9b9c7
06ecc92f0962a87781ae432af2b9fd1246e3a4a1
F20101111_AAAXIE mcclister_d_Page_137thm.jpg
ae2d76c30a93f9706ef5fc79e3406d06
8fba204caf7669769378677d39e0382bf60ee99b
F20101111_AAAWYW mcclister_d_Page_102.tif
876a18634196e97c59b04bec7a3c35b3
42caca21f75987fc5e1782485f53a4d440ea3bb8
5960 F20101111_AAAZPC mcclister_d_Page_284thm.jpg
779293874667238ef228a99df29f36ff
a2aa0544562e6720ecc268bc65e530523c3200df
98639 F20101111_AAAXVQ mcclister_d_Page_190.jpg
7f9ff4ba05e0ba3b77c6ddad7b1d3e55
301c218591a3f0f97beba58b29789607f5d0ea7c
F20101111_AAAYSJ mcclister_d_Page_217.tif
abf34b0f78c92384ca63bf13ada52934
07afa15ad52bc223572f90af842e8424cef2f1a1
6744 F20101111_AAAXIF mcclister_d_Page_213thm.jpg
9d563e7b025a07ab3ea8d8c255af7311
6a0f7274e50f118f54bd84a7f8e7c34059d021e6
2382 F20101111_AAAWYX mcclister_d_Page_120.txt
170503e7f9c7a6644f5b8c1a0622f6eb
c73e45e961eb0b4e41b1404912ed329741525b4b
29617 F20101111_AAAZPD mcclister_d_Page_070.QC.jpg
cf95898cf1fe7d21c0ef627540ebe449
2e1e0da687eaa0af039d1af3d111028a7818829a
106526 F20101111_AAAXVR mcclister_d_Page_251.jp2
9b2fece7772e9d68bdc500d83e377989
557327b948d8cf98499aaa190f76c7e42710a691
F20101111_AAAYSK mcclister_d_Page_218.tif
b992f49f09f3f28ec874605bbfb04d8a
1f5828c4527abc1269fcc87e0ad45b25834a4d03
28684 F20101111_AAAXIG mcclister_d_Page_235.QC.jpg
6bf145fb38d0a662b8b0d09038a35c50
c9a1d6b0dd5bbae51e3143fbc4170d3c007d956e
F20101111_AAAWYY mcclister_d_Page_147.tif
7329a1980a41e6e49fd5d22f3111385c
b34a79e3a462c430be2c99a9efe4b8402f478c99
F20101111_AAAZPE mcclister_d_Page_152thm.jpg
a56bca48e1a6daa35cefcbe54c47aa39
a06ffdc6ce8b2cf2f726e27484b04cc90b434ff7
102069 F20101111_AAAYFA mcclister_d_Page_111.jpg
0c172afdecf7531c11732c92fb30d3f6
db8bb31fb83a5f41bf9e3ddf9b7c9bb0e56730fd
55485 F20101111_AAAXVS mcclister_d_Page_024.pro
18f1ca4cf577aa0420b7da7a09e66e7f
81a870a6243f1ed7d6f0374bac76217f013d5dea
F20101111_AAAYSL mcclister_d_Page_220.tif
e946e71f7be5ca25136af582e2597290
c542d5607cbc47830ca472290066323f2c73c916
1954 F20101111_AAAXIH mcclister_d_Page_083.txt
eb6edb183d4fbf07a8cf41856e579775
2452e4e838be867092a5cb4937c8ee854706a6bc
2404 F20101111_AAAWYZ mcclister_d_Page_077.txt
2373fd9e5dc1ac69624ab7d1ee624d45
408e0d7a2de4089a883d8fe14ce6e86b19c515ac
F20101111_AAAZPF mcclister_d_Page_021thm.jpg
7ddd1d081b784da4cc356a6b67d6cdea
2b67362d7fceb1aff285be2c4081dbb99daecfce
105384 F20101111_AAAYFB mcclister_d_Page_112.jpg
3eba942e9270b3e33021678036a8aa9a
c2033df0cfdd6fbb53547ebc44da38b4631d76f5
F20101111_AAAXVT mcclister_d_Page_145.tif
db6978e377617a7085f859967e57e378
1cc4e12d6b49f3ea8fbf3fa36b9e4b50fb297aa3
F20101111_AAAYSM mcclister_d_Page_222.tif
4c7478f638031b5567a91269fa10a58d
a8d78199a8b0cae237fc29ee4cbdf8eb728ac74b
2106 F20101111_AAAXII mcclister_d_Page_182.txt
8e9ec719e95b18a85bf6ab5759e0d1f2
60ba15e999525b7468a28ae969182f9c34e5ceed
4722 F20101111_AAAZPG mcclister_d_Page_297thm.jpg
35c3177916d13e69810c7ecac7852da7
26975068bdf0e0d47744d73f1ec48c83b9ba8d35
87512 F20101111_AAAYFC mcclister_d_Page_114.jpg
8c73a6c7fa5139bed5487b01e297a7dc
9837515e16baf2a12460f495750a5cf2f31d451e
55538 F20101111_AAAXVU mcclister_d_Page_254.pro
4ad94fa1aa8f84e2f30520ae3b5868a3
fcde2f2b305ffc53eb50e72913abf463aeb966fe
F20101111_AAAYSN mcclister_d_Page_224.tif
78f62d25e1bc4a47b8929165220b8404
0626d53695e8aeb7bd8ef102fe8442bea1cde318
27963 F20101111_AAAXIJ mcclister_d_Page_016.QC.jpg
33fbd4336b5cec4b4ae40086ea788c67
fd48a6c57ccd1e22d2e54e10b273dee153c7c92e
5589 F20101111_AAAZPH mcclister_d_Page_092thm.jpg
4ed3f78a053a8279aa071dd1964b162c
d33f90313f1757eedef08274e4f07ede2791ce15
95730 F20101111_AAAYFD mcclister_d_Page_115.jpg
88c3b2f705ecc4ad6fff7dbb3d7e4c42
5a34ecf63e3688ab9dc5bff01ee0a114e2418662
90976 F20101111_AAAXVV mcclister_d_Page_135.jpg
0812f9b9ac42f89e8046e3e76d2ae372
760d2609bb7d8c320b2fea6fc4f6196dd0419ad7
F20101111_AAAYSO mcclister_d_Page_225.tif
fa418587dd39ea231ad9cce5b25734e2
50396188533b88055776968416a7f60f903bc3ff
F20101111_AAAXIK mcclister_d_Page_165.tif
b88d60a0900b88d8cea32278f0faa2fc
431b06fb44af335dd8ee0e9cf9c74639b9fbfefe
19811 F20101111_AAAZPI mcclister_d_Page_297.QC.jpg
77a4272c8f7746f11d899ec585ce83f4
83eb69a6dddf2e3caabe62d7da440c370d197359
86024 F20101111_AAAYFE mcclister_d_Page_117.jpg
66927d37501b66759249b7e678d1bd38
dc1e67a67759eb999ad81cd5908dffd5d3184298
93647 F20101111_AAAXVW mcclister_d_Page_218.jpg
7daa29aaeef4efd373cf064fba88b40a
8635df895f267cbc2a517e8e5fd47f84d75d5d07
F20101111_AAAYSP mcclister_d_Page_228.tif
b601c529b01144890447f0ebb57b5b6a
fe9235fb71f670a6bb833ebe3820cae25e266bba
6263 F20101111_AAAXIL mcclister_d_Page_110thm.jpg
2db7920a086c5faa3a3370bbfba6fc64
bb72ac2a429901aba35c1520cfeea173db175dab
6704 F20101111_AAAZPJ mcclister_d_Page_160thm.jpg
0c1e76fd2e86e0f7652588f51e72005a
2cc190a390023fc69ecdf8a2481ecec3b5c32553
108186 F20101111_AAAYFF mcclister_d_Page_119.jpg
7761027ce19c9dbf6fa227297bfaaf71
9e528d13177120407064f962111f0125c301737f
6951 F20101111_AAAXVX mcclister_d_Page_107thm.jpg
63a8eb5c037527c81b9283b2fa7aa3b6
6c966e837b6fdc2ac2816229540d85f6ba1b7619
F20101111_AAAYSQ mcclister_d_Page_229.tif
cc8884397124f147301df32f91931299
19dd52e263edf6681ddb7a903a4226a10d9e02c1
52293 F20101111_AAAXIM mcclister_d_Page_212.pro
330282cad4594d8fe925e884df912efa
117c6f7e5c32321770420bfaa42068e4bb73015a
F20101111_AAAZPK mcclister_d_Page_015thm.jpg
d2f23650f24465dc57b9f6d9403a8f5a
3cfdfbadc4340b99e9882a82eff77ac421265c81
97164 F20101111_AAAYFG mcclister_d_Page_120.jpg
f0362d99cdad102fc55913bb86602964
2952299fa3e0cdc9c33ef6a4ba282b066d257ce1
26519 F20101111_AAAXVY mcclister_d_Page_250.QC.jpg
450e8f88443464aeae1cca469c7facd6
076b71046fe4643525cc99bc53fd3ce6cbecf16d
F20101111_AAAYSR mcclister_d_Page_232.tif
f95e84548a4a593920e774975c5242ef
4a851147fe569ce1dfecb4834ee1163522c9aa3c
28249 F20101111_AAAXIN mcclister_d_Page_241.QC.jpg
3e44cc96268287ffd61addb92171ed20
470499bd0902eda9dc670ed406f07f741464631c
6945 F20101111_AAAZPL mcclister_d_Page_247thm.jpg
f6b3b4563dda2b12b454c39ce8fceed7
ac2b4c5f6bff5d859c512ca1dd60028fb3347103
90530 F20101111_AAAYFH mcclister_d_Page_123.jpg
5c4f1b0c7e503db5f9f5f83d00e654fb
0171a6ddb3e79d68baf3b326824f0c4ecd7825ea
F20101111_AAAXVZ mcclister_d_Page_216.jp2
7be2a359ab3579c0ac94c24dcdb88c70
a63ff1a0722a0b808f0f92e495365836f8c68d9c
F20101111_AAAZCA mcclister_d_Page_082.txt
db7c802fa8ec80dff7920c6ae1a31d30
efd47c6592410414dd5f27816952fa906b9edd93
F20101111_AAAYSS mcclister_d_Page_236.tif
13fc4155048d8fa20d56c3f9e16af7d2
9fffede2bf00cf5b9e7e30d23fea170935635cb0
15002 F20101111_AAAXIO mcclister_d_Page_004.QC.jpg
d2eecd797124632e5101c7ba9eb7052e
df6e19fb5e98712da1cd5f9a751fa0383052a659
28512 F20101111_AAAZPM mcclister_d_Page_178.QC.jpg
e3ccc0e75eb8493837170c819f7a4302
0764f8ba41b3aee10a78895d688e2f9fc4595c47
96894 F20101111_AAAYFI mcclister_d_Page_125.jpg
bc11727343c130299c2691d2094fef03
ba6399af4edab8dbeac6350499ae21e24e00a80f
2368 F20101111_AAAZCB mcclister_d_Page_085.txt
2a0a6c2cb1c6b996988e6cc11ec7f5ea
e2f6b20bbd3d496eeaf73ea5d48d9620a6da5bff
F20101111_AAAYST mcclister_d_Page_237.tif
4855a5dcb84f2590b31f13d6461965b0
29e02a8b6f2582bff8e778c88a1742d96bf1d4fe
F20101111_AAAXIP mcclister_d_Page_089.tif
0953d6b203338f24da1f0dfe05ddf45c
3dcef749db4e096f5b07daa13a5be35de7c5b5f0
27615 F20101111_AAAZPN mcclister_d_Page_224.QC.jpg
4a4a0bb6a005a4b8684facab17820919
4630f450bd5bbadacd9636f1b299d7daed314809
94867 F20101111_AAAYFJ mcclister_d_Page_126.jpg
2cd7a26b0e9e7cf46c650554fc63a9d7
3903562fc2b68ac2ea460a55be8a1cc990ef6816
2169 F20101111_AAAZCC mcclister_d_Page_087.txt
391f541966ea58ef90d27c7cdf6e4315
65a4ad0b8c5aa56c4bd4953057e113772e9ddac1
F20101111_AAAYSU mcclister_d_Page_238.tif
0188074e9d5185a32ba3b2f4f2351f17
dc490112177a66ca46a551380ed9fa6c5bbcb9f0
28795 F20101111_AAAXIQ mcclister_d_Page_051.QC.jpg
8a463695996f9f75fadcf6f701953a0a
c52ba7c0c2e82b860ca9ae59e8bc79778815cc09
6053 F20101111_AAAZPO mcclister_d_Page_083thm.jpg
12842221a332d1e5172033bb1d0f7d08
e553badca882251cd67734d957b623e782bad3e4
95433 F20101111_AAAYFK mcclister_d_Page_127.jpg
73d154db980cfafba3703479d5f0e2c9
73d735c069866b0eaf243e27453d2c9dcb0e8d1d
2226 F20101111_AAAZCD mcclister_d_Page_090.txt
d15a628afd432ef930d7aa6020526861
4f3ff90242622b9c07d5048022dde2d31073de7f
F20101111_AAAYSV mcclister_d_Page_241.tif
8f6442c06def778a1a334a0c645c53a4
739b4a53dbde97c1acfeabe1707e66d891e6310a
56908 F20101111_AAAXIR mcclister_d_Page_072.pro
1f9204a41ee833287433035e97feb967
530d4198b935863bf5fd9b23af5d27b7ea6f54d8
28697 F20101111_AAAZPP mcclister_d_Page_165.QC.jpg
0db5544ae0fa017412c7f537ddec2f40
b89bf130e3ffcab9afe347d643ae78eb2b82e8dd
94955 F20101111_AAAYFL mcclister_d_Page_128.jpg
d43be48e866acf95c334d7abf46ac8a7
6c4c783d41ec930d50b2c368d78fbb00227cd267
1780 F20101111_AAAZCE mcclister_d_Page_092.txt
c77cf7b476747dfc8acda92f88bf3038
218b6a0b4d83bbb1f8c08c6c5d62c482481f2aa0
F20101111_AAAYSW mcclister_d_Page_242.tif
34a3037407d2b9e20565da077eaa1eef
6d34342a1533c139874d082ec138ec73fff5ed1f
F20101111_AAAXIS mcclister_d_Page_257.tif
b4a4c0a24fe82914a9696f1e25f2d434
6897e355126586b5893002a13ca55a8043a956d1
F20101111_AAAZPQ mcclister_d_Page_295thm.jpg
c6e19c4d3103a2dacf748a2fae5f405e
a10b92a8345f026070509b28d0bd8affde39e419
99114 F20101111_AAAYFM mcclister_d_Page_129.jpg
6826e27d52699f4e0fb5c2206d346c63
e14d3b2ccbfd54d76263caedc6b6a24b61a58bdb
2301 F20101111_AAAZCF mcclister_d_Page_094.txt
4f801187022bcdce43a951160804cacc
53d922d668ea3467264cc8012ab08336f98af7a1
F20101111_AAAYSX mcclister_d_Page_248.tif
eff6825a460ba7cea6a1d0ce70b4aaaf
55a71c1d23b6fe374bdbd9645dc3655b862e334a
129803 F20101111_AAAXIT mcclister_d_Page_080.jp2
ad800a359df55f510cf27c854366c158
18c1e0758a86e20b529ea0b671d345d5ee2da767
6294 F20101111_AAAZPR mcclister_d_Page_246thm.jpg
c8142443a1a569009691547e6d0254f4
5c30404162f026c7c8d1716e0bc49ea29b7938f7
108369 F20101111_AAAYFN mcclister_d_Page_131.jpg
6b668125f897905be593db52fce2d19e
f48b314b5e74964afd54d1ca6ca182a1bccd4a9d
2520 F20101111_AAAZCG mcclister_d_Page_095.txt
2cf21a00467c69b682c495e45cfd4335
faf0b8c616552368cd8c7eb596452b8aaea9f788
F20101111_AAAYSY mcclister_d_Page_249.tif
4ced9725a069b7415a0d71ed3a75111a
706ea2100985cfe57daa4c3a60bb479a65c4d343
26937 F20101111_AAAXIU mcclister_d_Page_057.QC.jpg
cc2f00b37157925bdaf9770497153cde
2996a660d97dd2de8bc6a669bf7b3b1647ca8689
6615 F20101111_AAAZPS mcclister_d_Page_285thm.jpg
1a9803f471fc993119eb6a09ca025e8e
18947228fd8b1405d9733eb8635a123e37e2c72a
87270 F20101111_AAAYFO mcclister_d_Page_133.jpg
c570f1bd634015f9f12fba2f9ad0f078
3342522c65fa2ac99444922b26518edfba4658a2
2496 F20101111_AAAZCH mcclister_d_Page_097.txt
8ad265bc853d41843e7236410d460f36
782e09baf75d61070d287087e58384aaa948dc39
F20101111_AAAYSZ mcclister_d_Page_251.tif
c09ab046c55853a99f64c66c5b26f21c
108bd05b4ee297b6c7db58a26363b41085cd59e9
6839 F20101111_AAAZPT mcclister_d_Page_132thm.jpg
7be9e1f6f3666a5f7476e85299f66587
f64efbb9e96ce1f0c5474843b8c85f7c52b76b0c
94086 F20101111_AAAYFP mcclister_d_Page_136.jpg
6326ad0cb79b6a54e55dd7d135a7a38e
18ddce834314a20c8795964669365a668ce03897
3007 F20101111_AAAZCI mcclister_d_Page_098.txt
1506dc04654c78f966c02c4c83d7cbbf
0be879283bdf81ae92fbe16d488532164a7f5329
90124 F20101111_AAAXIV mcclister_d_Page_222.jpg
a158ecd32ae00d4c653571f71183fe62
983ea3a4b64ee1753bc42ca168aa7162879cee69
6698 F20101111_AAAZPU mcclister_d_Page_062thm.jpg
f11fcf387f1c58ebc2fc424054dc3451
068c7a48a0a9eb1f2159f371ab7b8bf8d3623fb6
91424 F20101111_AAAYFQ mcclister_d_Page_137.jpg
7647fdfc07e0a7c279d0a0176ce8ecda
1b592f3c00442128ae57ccfb94fc670c62239909
2250 F20101111_AAAZCJ mcclister_d_Page_100.txt
1baf8bdc7933a8cf035a3e6832503e57
4a0782a37ac7d2d2c53567b63bf6e2350c3243d8
120439 F20101111_AAAXIW mcclister_d_Page_150.jp2
e83bb43b7aeb42295e1162a9be4b4cc1
29cb638345c475028b00b2cb21f6ec21870430d3
446463 F20101111_AAAZPV UFE0021949_00001.xml FULL
d386d4b054fc78eb8e67acbc8eb998a3
ed2c9118b2f4b1c8e01653a95fccf07b067788f1
F20101111_AAAZCK mcclister_d_Page_101.txt
bb953beffb58606bae043fd6671bac84
03a55c9a4e628eb3f5cc2cdee023a52145c25c0b
93625 F20101111_AAAXIX mcclister_d_Page_217.jpg
3bb1dac4c8a81658a0060bddb0cb25f3
c2cf82e11980bbd223bd1594f7c40580f451aedb
29239 F20101111_AAAZPW mcclister_d_Page_011.QC.jpg
e1b7e88fe9786e3e0568a1880b0c191d
cf781abccddf494672cb6fb172d688f8534c6c4d
89242 F20101111_AAAYFR mcclister_d_Page_138.jpg
e59ab88e91acfcd2ee7398f19192e39c
5ab97f4a03b1912db18b9e341963aa91900ed0aa
F20101111_AAAZCL mcclister_d_Page_102.txt
243d4dcc7f0532a5e84f7bcfcba61d35
d22cc603d2bc1cd5604f66c6c55fa68b9f12272b
F20101111_AAAXIY mcclister_d_Page_219.tif
e9c0b25c08eb246a7329626023a28c7c
6371dff46a506d4a2bf6f44311a668f14b0c9fb9
6871 F20101111_AAAZPX mcclister_d_Page_017thm.jpg
5e83b4f96694714168c0f5632ea2375f
91a5569b1ef75c361a5877c8df09436eb1067187
97548 F20101111_AAAYFS mcclister_d_Page_139.jpg
6bab1a4d6ef4e6d66f96ebb109e33255
6be085579248992d55a2321e9c18daeba27233fe
3022 F20101111_AAAZCM mcclister_d_Page_103.txt
a6a42aa1d66147060e1d02457e87d016
14a455b0e84eba24d2c872a561473fa6450e609c
F20101111_AAAXIZ mcclister_d_Page_219thm.jpg
0e1fd4161774a4d43194b5e2f992f411
ef16f09f314136f90f7cc7c07cab20cf272dbbbe
6460 F20101111_AAAZPY mcclister_d_Page_022thm.jpg
7d2a3f7893bd658a9b1cb8456fa00df1
6844ae404b1d8d108df8744e397ed0b7019f4f6f
92378 F20101111_AAAYFT mcclister_d_Page_145.jpg
832cbd189583a018fdc82ce08e775ae0
e51583ddf25566faa00c9941576a00f5e5e83d67
6726 F20101111_AAAZPZ mcclister_d_Page_029thm.jpg
bbf13b72f3dc8c2dac581e63c300d440
5976247535d4130389631b44f2c0cfebd8e0e195
2444 F20101111_AAAZCN mcclister_d_Page_104.txt
93c5ca366a0cfc8edda70b79a1cb0774
fc0260742f8823921823509a587abb2598412bab
113333 F20101111_AAAWRA mcclister_d_Page_237.jp2
7c1e06e116a8e56bc70579ba29885f0d
22efe8be0501d47d28c3c55d66b3ae16df85d65d
92865 F20101111_AAAYFU mcclister_d_Page_149.jpg
2088e1e78d6321f7bed56dcb12c9db16
281d7aec2c8488667aae144613c79e1e4172828a
2681 F20101111_AAAZCO mcclister_d_Page_106.txt
0b542ce115ca408d6f6e887537faaa9d
a6e50ac5b5df0940bf7774ca0596ec618ce24bb1
30627 F20101111_AAAWRB mcclister_d_Page_112.QC.jpg
fdb9daaac808b5416c5aff2c981ad7f3
37766e612fb292f270e8318394a8dbeed2a42a04
95561 F20101111_AAAYFV mcclister_d_Page_151.jpg
45e774326a001e68b71cf0659075f1f9
273cb5fb0ec5a4db79409311d2d0104903cadfc2
47501 F20101111_AAAYYA mcclister_d_Page_187.pro
940efecc740dd9eb5ce0fb56fec90a1f
c78a642569cdf5f585068f73093eef8088c352f4
2814 F20101111_AAAZCP mcclister_d_Page_109.txt
b2b1d4d3773d5b4768244a1653d6aeaf
d40eb6d64cf05d8c534056466042b240987dc7ab
59279 F20101111_AAAWRC mcclister_d_Page_125.pro
03b105b9187b3b52bd2ed1d3bb312cd0
99d623dc9af16aae8e17900c47730c9131b6d9f1
90705 F20101111_AAAYFW mcclister_d_Page_157.jpg
f4daecc6652b925d048a35c153f5a54d
aa4f462556b8c4f62bc9f918e08f310c49df4fc4
59066 F20101111_AAAYYB mcclister_d_Page_191.pro
318cf3735bdf5bc1d6f63dd3d68a022f
02e747c69a21e4dacddecc7b263ad1b46ede4106
2582 F20101111_AAAZCQ mcclister_d_Page_112.txt
8e0a6bf12f5ce1690103aa340a30a03a
10b138a8a2bbd3598246f8b85d89b1a932e0e998
2320 F20101111_AAAWRD mcclister_d_Page_245.txt
3f9e3c2cb8a5fae43d529da5363f1756
18759f8169fda3a325a96b989d45fa803bfd6adc
86385 F20101111_AAAYFX mcclister_d_Page_158.jpg
16cb05fbc45ba06bcbe53b9bdc4564eb
130f2ac9711ab0c0663bfdf9842265e26f5e017e
53770 F20101111_AAAYYC mcclister_d_Page_192.pro
3a0d7bc7d35548cd929a2b6632e2fdf8
248bf7268023053d8672761c52e3131e573a2341
2499 F20101111_AAAZCR mcclister_d_Page_113.txt
92e857fcecea7b426007ce31c1a57294
e190505d45824b87c076fdcd2c27f142edea4f89
110389 F20101111_AAAWRE mcclister_d_Page_287.jpg
219a86cd5984df2d6250131b8d780f26
70da8e94d830c8db6f30cbba8f36ece0f602b4d1
93729 F20101111_AAAYFY mcclister_d_Page_160.jpg
36b9fa3f78dd96763d53fed2f5e2c8a8
1aed657a09fa9075ce81a2b9e05dd9f1809419e6
55244 F20101111_AAAYYD mcclister_d_Page_194.pro
b3e547781dca79327113af73b2da67d0
f34b0bba0bca397a9e992bae822ea36086baaf92
2648 F20101111_AAAZCS mcclister_d_Page_119.txt
e16b6e2672d26ecbe3be44d860b98d1b
d02d33e6710fecca0e5b5a5aea08454e6bb8fd64
59547 F20101111_AAAWRF mcclister_d_Page_154.pro
edd1db69af16b0825d306ee2cf3dd56a
6d701d7f35dcd888d1dc4b54d414e99d46d49530
88508 F20101111_AAAYFZ mcclister_d_Page_162.jpg
4a5773da86d6246b4bc6d9e8e854e5a6
0fcba823f465f52befac04f8d99da2e8757649d7
2054 F20101111_AAAZCT mcclister_d_Page_122.txt
3029e383d6503c07b17b353df1d9bf2e
86fd194e3d978684ae32c40278e9c8a262c31ac3
97645 F20101111_AAAWRG mcclister_d_Page_193.jpg
0909586c748707e6f25a84696b2a97dc
afdfc5568b703312eb51041fca2c55d21d42ae51
56690 F20101111_AAAYYE mcclister_d_Page_198.pro
a23c0d48bf24309bf8879184674023b5
6f30ba4ab7d080e2ea9f1dbabd0a630d9f9f9f5f
F20101111_AAAZCU mcclister_d_Page_123.txt
3791c16c11cefa83f6c7872b134013bf
8f2190415fc1b734ee3832e75983d2941c65aa6d
59692 F20101111_AAAWRH mcclister_d_Page_196.pro
4d1aa2a8b611583ef4dee68d279e2b38
738d15cce39610078991a85da0ce7495948835ae
98537 F20101111_AAAXOA mcclister_d_Page_130.jpg
d8ffd66bd40d559165192a61ac41f0c6
0683550783223dda8615d5f4943baa8d607e09f6
56852 F20101111_AAAYYF mcclister_d_Page_199.pro
67f4f03dcf4c25da222841b09cef0563
34d455826daebfae89dd63eeab386dd5c68c410e
2465 F20101111_AAAZCV mcclister_d_Page_128.txt
6501034dce69e05f580d7a730f34a37f
844cbd6805b354ff2181fc3ebf81508d2e7a945a
6364 F20101111_AAAWRI mcclister_d_Page_151thm.jpg
e2f765475f8caab3a43e0c92247da382
7a7b6c9d6a8c56d4dea7b3f9f8c166ce6359b0c4
1906 F20101111_AAAXOB mcclister_d_Page_170.txt
576e95dae5da631332145429aebc857b
f7ac3c28539094a5f6efb657139e8298d7dbf9bc
53639 F20101111_AAAYYG mcclister_d_Page_200.pro
565e6a69579a28a3e94e5fd5d815d953
a15bc9ce39123da314237babbf87b73afc6c89fb
2526 F20101111_AAAZCW mcclister_d_Page_129.txt
f3d2af1c8a34679cdfefa0d961eb0121
2ad200d632ea1efb6b0ee6072562daac5ee00d24
31166 F20101111_AAAWRJ mcclister_d_Page_021.QC.jpg
bb0d9bea861ebd3eb3a8501a45841583
1a1f1e14708c97d7780fca7f34f3ef1fb9f32dc2
117140 F20101111_AAAXOC mcclister_d_Page_103.jpg
1361e17ed0d34880d614ba2639e9bd3c
3894cd1b4b686f8cb9a3ba7ff7ca19587a731708
63872 F20101111_AAAYYH mcclister_d_Page_201.pro
1012d18c766c75bc50ed0fe13aa4cb38
fd3926cc61c0a7e5294480e58cd46f9edc7aeb0e
F20101111_AAAZCX mcclister_d_Page_130.txt
2f0cc1971c08759faf1301ef8f62e226
61c6eadb6816e3b5bb7fd33c76703c6a2a5f3c50
26202 F20101111_AAAWRK mcclister_d_Page_126.QC.jpg
e9a830d5735f2109c7d8d02747478d47
22080054dcdfa44f621befffaa5802e7e8598000
49296 F20101111_AAAXOD mcclister_d_Page_018.pro
a91c3a6edea8f39d6ad3497b17731cb6
726ae46dbbdf87971cf58fc56b4195489b679df5
66055 F20101111_AAAYYI mcclister_d_Page_202.pro
dbf86ca5f7e261e49e3339c36304de97
bd8acf300ea5698270cc56e841f9492521b72a85
2620 F20101111_AAAZCY mcclister_d_Page_131.txt
ab54e6b77bcf140bac31487cb1e67d00
7ae65acabfdf59af890544af59aba127cd35e408
F20101111_AAAWRL mcclister_d_Page_016.tif
fd2ce5ad497529db5bcbfe60f2499337
680b3e276e86684a7d2bb1264557d0165328b771
111543 F20101111_AAAXOE mcclister_d_Page_141.jpg
aeb488f0f58185fc1bc5433b72d19908
e7299e78ba62d72677b8be1ae0fd359ba9ac49d0
56758 F20101111_AAAYYJ mcclister_d_Page_206.pro
244564c69f469bd0f341446f30c5b640
4c6b618e30f591506c887942d649635b7eb743fc
2175 F20101111_AAAZCZ mcclister_d_Page_135.txt
5875e513a45dcbd3af4ce1f4ef2bd9fd
9f2f6096cef1dfa80de1e315fd8d808750bea15f
112897 F20101111_AAAWRM mcclister_d_Page_276.jp2
750de1d6406e2c7c9e7d7a4bd963e9ab
22781e00eb7ba5b9b6baeb58991ee676e5521f19
116647 F20101111_AAAXOF mcclister_d_Page_074.jp2
63c6cc9443c31ed576a389356600e5bf
49df097458cdc49bdf0630cb1e4e784bc9118769
56344 F20101111_AAAYYK mcclister_d_Page_207.pro
6bed88d059aa87fd28faeb6204696487
ba1f839262b49f634b68da092e599a6eac7b5d84
60002 F20101111_AAAWRN mcclister_d_Page_253.pro
8212d27d5e22e6af3301ec663159cc39
3a3a998cb5bfbf430767facea5cee81a3031b3f9
2477 F20101111_AAAXOG mcclister_d_Page_111.txt
0e6c6f354c9efca142860ba578a4afc3
e8870ed8fc64b0d655aaee0cc8505253945e2fe0
56963 F20101111_AAAYYL mcclister_d_Page_208.pro
51ffba24e904b23cf315c87d12c4a387
dfdd9fa8fbec87d83975628d829ca41f6adf2721
99000 F20101111_AAAWRO mcclister_d_Page_062.jpg
b24e34e13dd25d469b55a06a6b69edde
2d29cf99f604d24a5c1ac11562bac26959d2686c
28757 F20101111_AAAXOH mcclister_d_Page_088.QC.jpg
fa0bd9d133a0129e54de748e3015aea8
44c0dbfbf802033025e0dcabbe3734a29b5b7a49
127269 F20101111_AAAYLA mcclister_d_Page_130.jp2
3c056c2f0b3e79bce1eb464d3c36dd64
a61d877729fdcf495f279bfc02b8267cbf1e5d2e
54528 F20101111_AAAYYM mcclister_d_Page_210.pro
4ce975db57fd289dc7638c07f81516dd
5a7b811750d3314bec0088c64f3a581056be5217
2147 F20101111_AAAWRP mcclister_d_Page_240.txt
5b27c06086d13d4a67a3f03b5c6bc0fc
7e026fa30ec07d24f908acabf81a74a6d1114ad1
F20101111_AAAXOI mcclister_d_Page_011.tif
8dd089ddeec5609f1de403d9bd41264c
efce1595d65e8f03ae059506ddcb1fd5fe9a84a5
139755 F20101111_AAAYLB mcclister_d_Page_131.jp2
b744d5fa2efc34a41eec7e7865d612ed
1d2c207403e3dfe035357cfc8e36b7e9dcfe6bd8
58692 F20101111_AAAYYN mcclister_d_Page_211.pro
9a5a3850f95c7d3c23bfbb402ae23983
7280de0ea6563349244c65fa04444685f47f29c6
100541 F20101111_AAAWRQ mcclister_d_Page_080.jpg
b6f3fbae677080dfbd194a9c0650a08d
97c7c9e26b2162eba57d1a45ca1901296f7a50d9
77551 F20101111_AAAXOJ mcclister_d_Page_007.jpg
d4a0858dc520e26ac54ffeb09cdce56f
7d0fd5e61c3af5a0f3def42349ac341b386f5075
126833 F20101111_AAAYLC mcclister_d_Page_132.jp2
70194f5a611e9cf7df12ea9ffd25536d
71a9bd5f0d70abecc4c2c8f98f84a8a835ed7c3b
55054 F20101111_AAAYYO mcclister_d_Page_213.pro
269763ebf7e914b55cd2a1aa3140f6c8
2d46f8791fa92511f7d96081d975bd621ea2b638
131260 F20101111_AAAWRR mcclister_d_Page_113.jp2
43b74f295a93ba5eefaf339f2a275266
71122906a240c3d231a2d185f3438854d5eb62bf
65957 F20101111_AAAXOK mcclister_d_Page_108.pro
f857bfb81a4ba8097b774ab11288370f
314992d8ed1babad20168a1c38f862a887f2bb5a
114792 F20101111_AAAYLD mcclister_d_Page_133.jp2
dfc98c098b5703bc5c5f1ed66e1c22e7
79caf8359697c37e3180b7b1e96842adec285314
25213 F20101111_AAAXBA mcclister_d_Page_248.QC.jpg
75821c536074173201674969471fda22
3c8a611f2d87b75a1a051eb4b867242de7c5f9c0
58026 F20101111_AAAYYP mcclister_d_Page_214.pro
db07859c5a34974057d3d5d2d8e7d691
02b574796500ae47c8dd3860216c29b6894ea72f
F20101111_AAAWRS mcclister_d_Page_227.tif
b90d9b313561650410e4d9936ed0c93e
5d91532549ff46cb200067ad6aa417b55b3b74e1
21825 F20101111_AAAXOL mcclister_d_Page_046.QC.jpg
2ed7ac53201abb790b42b747125e4c91
4a62e5b8c6119b52145b9adab7aea44a4f1ba98e
121436 F20101111_AAAYLE mcclister_d_Page_136.jp2
cc5f16c4916f16f2da297f5699f60a0e
7f9460f5572131c4b9124833ed01c690628112ac
89803 F20101111_AAAXBB mcclister_d_Page_047.jpg
f9cb3ff2ef1049c15347a55034a06682
337e35ac3e9164723c7e1898eee937d66d22e060
48942 F20101111_AAAYYQ mcclister_d_Page_215.pro
fc380b59554b4ec05c9e8d490a5beab2
d7f6de4d11995529293048e71ceb98c9c2ee5c3a
119434 F20101111_AAAWRT mcclister_d_Page_053.jp2
4ac6ba19a5913349c13a15a7077013af
f8b384d887e0c03479901577b256365f193bdf21
5956 F20101111_AAAXOM mcclister_d_Page_251thm.jpg
362a93fd2217f942e3600fdd3121e00a
6e0eb4c466dfd401c823e7c3276cff73e2674582
118846 F20101111_AAAYLF mcclister_d_Page_137.jp2
fb1fbf75119477000d392e29f7031319
6953bd9bf742b7293eb29bc73fa8bf5fb265592e
F20101111_AAAXBC mcclister_d_Page_222.txt
92a06564fa19974f42df403266d7b3ca
0f3ea7b06fa1db48b02f7e9196922440e7885074
57128 F20101111_AAAYYR mcclister_d_Page_218.pro
afbe672abd3598c74b0537e63b679d93
9e9407e4e4bdbf21e522178ad00f9c926a9850cd
30734 F20101111_AAAWRU mcclister_d_Page_098.QC.jpg
bf89013dca613e8ee6c1b28a1060e2a4
fc69eef8e42e894bd4a8b21a41cc7e1375154040
2275 F20101111_AAAXON mcclister_d_Page_124.txt
fa5fac84643a04846cd0642962f4341e
749aa57e960b7d4dcb1fe8370cb10f04f1cbb5b7
114658 F20101111_AAAYLG mcclister_d_Page_142.jp2
03e72c834b6a7f5719e973f3c371d905
1cc0ddae9484dd87929d3facd0f63bdf20350254
29925 F20101111_AAAZIA mcclister_d_Page_113.QC.jpg
4efe3af410fdb19ce4f89cca5a89c5ce
b8e19a29465a2858940b1603244eafc722c590a9
123968 F20101111_AAAXBD mcclister_d_Page_140.jp2
9be183b0580bd0aad06085aa3957aa16
14290dd6ed4b9b654a220393bb79a7402428f2d5
63831 F20101111_AAAYYS mcclister_d_Page_219.pro
bb299b9090b2f431475856848094ca3b
02acf84530d811724fa73be216736fb0138ed32e
2231 F20101111_AAAWRV mcclister_d_Page_099.txt
c176eca80f0a250ef74febef617a6546
b71ac7713bb3341a0f22c8bda4386765b83c2e0a
28064 F20101111_AAAXOO mcclister_d_Page_047.QC.jpg
99e5f0648065bd8ba5a282c698418ec4
a0efc48633e8e4c29e6579118c7e890855a4afce
130546 F20101111_AAAYLH mcclister_d_Page_143.jp2
81f4accfb35aa41ae91d96ff40997849
5a6450a73953ae529fae01a500279853ed74380c
27642 F20101111_AAAZIB mcclister_d_Page_212.QC.jpg
b263dbe44187af4699a41db47b3a9479
0beeae92a87609abc530cbe2785934da1f62a6de
136907 F20101111_AAAXBE mcclister_d_Page_184.jp2
d5547e7a3ccffc7cb055ba744bb3a126
ed555b8db9d80469067d2fc99ac2482986d55807
54812 F20101111_AAAYYT mcclister_d_Page_222.pro
aa0c0a0ebb489e40601bb15fe6c50712
1f3084b00e3f3ec7f66b21884c356ad040336f94
55964 F20101111_AAAWRW mcclister_d_Page_009.pro
6f86474b3690f69e1f7313d3e52823a4
387e489d5080a87f97542ec4b94b100a8334c87f
F20101111_AAAXOP mcclister_d_Page_030thm.jpg
1655d8cd4cabc78ddbbea43fdaedbdc3
0288fe5d17c593f16a1057b4797fe364523941f1
116210 F20101111_AAAYLI mcclister_d_Page_144.jp2
6fe1f22e2d03759be13d9af5055878cd
53ff9096131269b827582302fad968bb4c1b2582
28720 F20101111_AAAZIC mcclister_d_Page_024.QC.jpg
ba4cc288e29dcfc369927fca9d9320fa
2d23e5b1f24f07593c00c835317f0d83200c585f
55670 F20101111_AAAXBF mcclister_d_Page_256.pro
82aa0c5ffffbdc5594915925135cdde0
4d0e52a515822218c2caacc07e527af8095a56e6
53078 F20101111_AAAYYU mcclister_d_Page_223.pro
a620d6166eb746d9cfce0c11906c2301
560495c4a855909aeeaa88b74a9f8f751d2ad7c1
27314 F20101111_AAAWRX mcclister_d_Page_035.QC.jpg
5e773ad8704f610e9c847b89549c409f
49318d2bc7c343135eb43e9315f374f19a6ab7cf
115258 F20101111_AAAXOQ mcclister_d_Page_089.jp2
314d02a7f186e97dbff70bb43073fca6
0e467f4b81bb2a6121baf42fcc94a520f3faec2e
121992 F20101111_AAAYLJ mcclister_d_Page_149.jp2
8b2e8518d37b9cf6cb9894606d1c425b
bd23cc429fdf19703a755fb14aa1f8617880a2d3
29329 F20101111_AAAZID mcclister_d_Page_044.QC.jpg
618e6eaa82664df4768f41135bfe2436
b5830cc53def09fb8c7b874b97794ac61df7b1cf
89099 F20101111_AAAXBG mcclister_d_Page_156.jpg
04eead3e10af4fc8728393f064aeaad2
eee53af44e02696523f1a8920dda80b581307f16
51976 F20101111_AAAYYV mcclister_d_Page_224.pro
a0ff27e75f9c4940867af1d6713f7f69
168d7c6dec152a553202f018a3d94dbb34f6ecde
6728 F20101111_AAAWRY mcclister_d_Page_038thm.jpg
b51bca36674b4b6d9fbe2eb665d5a968
ce606a12a1774aa8e0c4c6d432f1707de7821f31
67368 F20101111_AAAXOR mcclister_d_Page_257.pro
830bbc2ba34d0a336df156974a4fcfec
6fadfd1a282095819bd57b4ec0ac1ea42cc3bcba
124585 F20101111_AAAYLK mcclister_d_Page_151.jp2
3964223ad6e05111c9e75599dde2cc9c
6430e55e266bb1d7c6b724bfa9dd5c1b85322258
27990 F20101111_AAAZIE mcclister_d_Page_234.QC.jpg
6db4768603221c951e1fe004deb5c754
50ea6b111eb7c49c56b5b90b49b9ac77f39c9280
6406 F20101111_AAAXBH mcclister_d_Page_186thm.jpg
a08a3dff7aec85a502c857e0ed65f571
2a431f47e2c9dcde2c41febc36f4c3711a45be9b
F20101111_AAAYYW mcclister_d_Page_226.pro
3e1cc1468a91264fe60283cf458a64a8
e7d06242017e0ce67b2c3af8b63ac94349b30dda
2120 F20101111_AAAWRZ mcclister_d_Page_093.txt
1ce6f9b6e5edc37fd67ddf6cf639239b
d387e7c0c0c1765e535b8ebe3b9e84d07fa16b23
F20101111_AAAXOS mcclister_d_Page_263.tif
d8fd05cfc6a4e43b1567fe5d291b337c
95618eddd9d038f3bc226ca183c7119c8600b7fe
102428 F20101111_AAAYLL mcclister_d_Page_153.jp2
ceff821c125845e3f88b9c64cb4aa7c2
82548da8dcbebf1b447ea01566ddcfd02d26aaa9
29168 F20101111_AAAZIF mcclister_d_Page_147.QC.jpg
1d380a307ae04b77d829028453d02091
cbbe7383fcc96fc07875faba60945252c4ed0540
F20101111_AAAXBI mcclister_d_Page_155.tif
2652331bb5eb6c2db10e32a02e12c6a8
e75725be3a6e0ad33a9f7449c4678c3d8f6257da
56752 F20101111_AAAYYX mcclister_d_Page_230.pro
4d3bd0e580181a4f62e9ddbcdfa0c32b
9231094897bbf88163578e2599cfb5e5f8d3ece5
81861 F20101111_AAAXOT mcclister_d_Page_297.jp2
2087aa7b4d33f86bbbcd27922906d77c
6f73199538a24dcf6019033463b54cc20c3d7f30
114471 F20101111_AAAYLM mcclister_d_Page_155.jp2
14d80744c4703f47ee32b30ee525a155
c1ac791f85dc66e38711999942d373f3085d28ca
6763 F20101111_AAAZIG mcclister_d_Page_011thm.jpg
2533a9202760ebfb42059cfea56df989
5538c5d756ce933e74f654d9e5b797e0a3a111d6
80795 F20101111_AAAXBJ mcclister_d_Page_018.jpg
b82ba396f089ecd61d2fcb5ce234ce42
576b4ca2b40c7bc0958ad64f0d64fe4f8aa09394
53589 F20101111_AAAYYY mcclister_d_Page_232.pro
a5c0b16f711e33326357921744b25651
2a6e9ca0ccb5bc70850c0f45f24143d3019ed38a
57733 F20101111_AAAXOU mcclister_d_Page_124.pro
01d4c1d6dc449748a028fa2ad01b437d
df391e333cbbbdfb3b2095542566c1343511850b
117556 F20101111_AAAYLN mcclister_d_Page_157.jp2
a6d01916cfddc2a4821d9293b3a9f83e
82891614f82a44c3936f929f291766af6267ef59
28758 F20101111_AAAZIH mcclister_d_Page_208.QC.jpg
cb7576a751ea69f1156f6e2c55913f07
2d4b2abde8ff7bb9c9aa4c34e65d8b778dd1a429
F20101111_AAAXBK mcclister_d_Page_195.tif
d5f82d186264774cbf3c5f7324b640d7
3f76f52fb031eb4c11f50dfa7834cf829cfae04a
67999 F20101111_AAAYYZ mcclister_d_Page_234.pro
81994ab822e844d68fa6b482525dee23
1eb2ee046001b2ece8d63c05a43e338fc4ac159e
6538 F20101111_AAAXOV mcclister_d_Page_144thm.jpg
88f0970e9670404243a43ff3355715cc
27b72bf0b852591714ec6ee3c8e9a43efc12741d
112092 F20101111_AAAYLO mcclister_d_Page_159.jp2
c5727ad74dfbf591c78d844b20d1c4ac
ddc65238da868e38a544a2c88abfd4a1cbff1281
6925 F20101111_AAAZII mcclister_d_Page_176thm.jpg
16f316ce7c2a10b45942c7f7df86cc9c
a559cc88858021415b1f66e13fd53b9fedfb06cf
55813 F20101111_AAAXBL mcclister_d_Page_052.pro
2f90d1c40eaf8bf708f05650144b83a7
573b05ce740ae4f64c46d35333f3e57d26eceea6
62729 F20101111_AAAXOW mcclister_d_Page_143.pro
e3e55138c15b39baff512c12813bc4c2
8ef31bc373b435f3582e15bda08056d2752fe312
121805 F20101111_AAAYLP mcclister_d_Page_160.jp2
af8e5f01a6f5169c767667ee022ff71e
78469f467add2bc04f586613027ac4953759c068
6969 F20101111_AAAZIJ mcclister_d_Page_161thm.jpg
418df119cac89c40a9f57a778b0aeb96
9b40fcd1398b8a910f83d3499f601c1b29131b7b
2132 F20101111_AAAXBM mcclister_d_Page_221.txt
ebafb67e65b653e978199d020fda7fce
567c2c19bdedeaa3b43ca412e17d99f9d77af286
99755 F20101111_AAAXOX mcclister_d_Page_195.jpg
f11677d1c0a97efce49c2cca2e1e207e
f7fac8b9fbf77e705cf9f83aec4c2cbac07622fc
114401 F20101111_AAAYLQ mcclister_d_Page_162.jp2
566c8e444089ca56a5d1954a2baf0b76
bc47f9f5a25022b1e294e8cdfcdd4547b3222c9a
29950 F20101111_AAAZIK mcclister_d_Page_255.QC.jpg
ab138e26bb61762c8f549601ff4868b6
956347eafc12584b860f36a05550b938f21070d3
64553 F20101111_AAAXBN mcclister_d_Page_252.pro
fa8aceae4a05357fc654ca4149ccaae5
a174bd6898f2edf088c66f024d9d7eec1ab3e8db
43676 F20101111_AAAXOY mcclister_d_Page_278.pro
e6f9c62df45d9d7bb73845599d3252fe
af02568885bd2ea3942076405fdfc2ffe059d42b
133976 F20101111_AAAYLR mcclister_d_Page_163.jp2
bb06ecdee0662dddb25c16899ddc6384
1046261c23ead374780f10eb48fb005143530709
6831 F20101111_AAAZIL mcclister_d_Page_236thm.jpg
292cbd5f4e337b15e9bb162aeccf4446
eff414fb873f78585b07398f39c71e7c6cb7092f
21073 F20101111_AAAXOZ mcclister_d_Page_005.QC.jpg
7ef6fe1c69b94a74e0d212ba0ce78329
91ddf631d07eb8516d718fad4c26fc09776f7b13
111442 F20101111_AAAYLS mcclister_d_Page_168.jp2
68a20f457eb4e38a199213a5b8cc17fb
b7a41ac8348fa82966627e52577121b4d1febf5e
6524 F20101111_AAAZIM mcclister_d_Page_169thm.jpg
0092bf7bcf9b05ded6bf8db7cbb86213
d27afc81425cbbee718f58f54058f55513030f9c
63769 F20101111_AAAXBO mcclister_d_Page_113.pro
b185a851ee65935d85a0d0a51d206de1
7dbed24259dc6d34f09f9835a60b70aade30e414
120296 F20101111_AAAYLT mcclister_d_Page_169.jp2
83188cc75675066d04641e5a50658961
8310d7f1c107e2b4aca9afcacf05ddd38391a13a
27680 F20101111_AAAZIN mcclister_d_Page_282.QC.jpg
c7c7697246f62b5ec1491172f07ef071
1a642da4aa5321d76a71393730bd3aa950c14aea
F20101111_AAAWXA mcclister_d_Page_175.tif
528ad92d7410f47b0d48d1bc8caf6aa6
d31b3344a25d7cbfdacc5498ee70d72632a28634
52679 F20101111_AAAXBP mcclister_d_Page_276.pro
0236a7ad1de1a454f73aaba3e62f78b6
31d3815a30724247bfbaac026e53ad78eb9d1402
123488 F20101111_AAAYLU mcclister_d_Page_179.jp2
fe6195231f6bfc4a503eb4d1633792cf
ef0c8ea90b4ae8cb2962d694fd366e5498422fba
F20101111_AAAZIO mcclister_d_Page_006thm.jpg
007c761b478037cc818cfc8ec30aa5bf
c6bb1b7a8a15b582ca2f514f4f85ae986c31a244
92554 F20101111_AAAWXB mcclister_d_Page_076.jpg
4cb6359d55e6c5f4adc198d078f89f10
cbb899865c93101a04da4275aed3da2200462ddf
101710 F20101111_AAAXBQ mcclister_d_Page_288.jpg
82df5a478f63470fab87ef08fc0f5d18
c90dfd2d0f01ca9a349ed8bacb2a5f5ac3c7ca88
59836 F20101111_AAAYLV mcclister_d_Page_180.jp2
658b516a076a357c31aa2196fdf47274
75fd565b814ffc78a9ce0adc7261774db03ad94e
29266 F20101111_AAAZIP mcclister_d_Page_292.QC.jpg
dd87e643b8686b1c3b73f735d9890b51
ab0f5fa5fc5ca0357bbc5764ad17450d96110e0d
60088 F20101111_AAAWXC mcclister_d_Page_247.pro
94ff2ca4ccdb9567601042a54dbf2434
ab40fccf28acf0cb29920c8fddfaf8a14a422896
2513 F20101111_AAAXBR mcclister_d_Page_038.txt
cf88c6f44bc9c25fecc202caec0d6f6d
51ed6d795ab4f869f3649ee8bc93fa2d74f559c5
135893 F20101111_AAAYLW mcclister_d_Page_183.jp2
3ef7e6881b8661b63fecbd5bc5c932a3
406dcdfb9b8234abe6ca25387a0501a22fbc5864
29575 F20101111_AAAZIQ mcclister_d_Page_247.QC.jpg
5d9f73ca213267e11c2bc10d135c94bf
d6dba207069b1749141a2101626adc3f672a5fbb
6589 F20101111_AAAWXD mcclister_d_Page_119thm.jpg
dee95526a9a07dcfabc42a18271af1ee
10fce2ab4aa70e9f979905d9ab65f4c5f70237e2
63756 F20101111_AAAXBS mcclister_d_Page_034.pro
d16089e0fe91c742e25223fe7a8c35e3
a2a0023046321b36eb518342f05d5820ed9f9718
F20101111_AAAZIR mcclister_d_Page_020thm.jpg
05503b5caff021dcae1e7371f59dc8e3
942890827da2d982fe7d92b2e5c22a96a4aaaa7b
F20101111_AAAWXE mcclister_d_Page_033.tif
302b62d4bf09975c88686ed482855ac5
4193628bf78c22482b829b444b7ae69053a8d338
5653 F20101111_AAAXBT mcclister_d_Page_007thm.jpg
479ed9cd04382140cd326c4e9593aa29
d67bef10a9876155082e553cc72ba808109160bd
123773 F20101111_AAAYLX mcclister_d_Page_185.jp2
d00d1a901a886f369ffd974c9c556a07
30d887347f7cdf21f4aa255fb17dc197c89ff460
26627 F20101111_AAAZIS mcclister_d_Page_078.QC.jpg
10895d81c78e2ad9424003a77f1fb1a2
ed303b30b053e7670068dc0c21f9ec29282c28ff
29501 F20101111_AAAXBU mcclister_d_Page_059.QC.jpg
3ac4afd6c39a116e19f34ea96bc88071
f91aba9d74f18ba60c6e082741fe16c5245daa7e
114607 F20101111_AAAYLY mcclister_d_Page_186.jp2
6c8a528e3670e6570de47c5bd14edfcf
27f6aadf105e525f833e99de0c1c2dc340378479
99219 F20101111_AAAWXF mcclister_d_Page_173.jpg
071623aaa0c9a3bd94e8f81ed2c58188
8a9864aa919d2c2250e457e1165a624a31f356c7
56267 F20101111_AAAXBV mcclister_d_Page_090.pro
7629bd6a8d35ef6f3d315c6589695571
3b0bdf50e69686a0d5b9d0da016a272e6c97e5c0
106459 F20101111_AAAYLZ mcclister_d_Page_188.jp2
d4d2bd0ae01fa91082311372c2897364
43209f2877b7068ae01ef690493080676fc48580
6691 F20101111_AAAZIT mcclister_d_Page_076thm.jpg
f7d3fce6b9f70bf73f2e06bb1b32e823
7c645395ba13368c39f74e0983b494f4f4ad7817
113427 F20101111_AAAWXG mcclister_d_Page_055.jpg
62d9c55737790789c5cd0d553c410b32
b51802530b3123750bf9500740a344062e438fb0
F20101111_AAAXBW mcclister_d_Page_101.tif
7cc25d80e29915df19629a351e2607f9
2f44c0fe93471d9a0ca6cdb9b24f34e515a9fa61
127663 F20101111_AAAXUA mcclister_d_Page_193.jp2
f20255c499922765e9f4044aeb4bfaa3
9b01ff05cb2d35068b00148c9c5fc50e941c99ac
6479 F20101111_AAAZIU mcclister_d_Page_035thm.jpg
90e4a5d927387b74b34a1e461ec80f61
c7132a375f505cb94cc472a74d861dade2416495
90248 F20101111_AAAWXH mcclister_d_Page_144.jpg
2a9b116ca7784e8b5106ac66ff7f1281
518bd7a7200f5ad10238b4205f2b3e2677641bcc
2266 F20101111_AAAXBX mcclister_d_Page_171.txt
43d90e33e52ea5dcccd8af972c40fd8f
4af6724d28319d1958110ebfa68b2f044165585e
26859 F20101111_AAAZIV mcclister_d_Page_155.QC.jpg
6566bd87cd048e46ba7b9609b626f959
3ac93f69698639e7e4082caba32ec4d42a0f182f
92057 F20101111_AAAWXI mcclister_d_Page_243.jpg
e2086bd50b8e985e102e5fae3c2e950c
4faf4b5abacc154a7786ad50bde9f988d9eda99b
54427 F20101111_AAAXBY mcclister_d_Page_227.pro
a8bb363999f2c6711330fa020635b771
0439b2dd68e3995a632ed46f58edb81c7e2894af
F20101111_AAAXUB mcclister_d_Page_141.tif
8e2a00cba1a8d61e2dd72d8798a2bacf
6510722ee2bad69fdec484f12d9496c196fd409e
6483 F20101111_AAAZIW mcclister_d_Page_142thm.jpg
e4ba9ba8fcc9c388b82f89c3312033c3
f3b08f73ff84458a746013c9748b0842557dbe8c
91735 F20101111_AAAWXJ mcclister_d_Page_220.jpg
6d29a63de433fdde0b28ab999fded678
04287a535450e7e294cfc8ffd44ddf29f7f2c4f4
3564 F20101111_AAAXBZ mcclister_d_Page_180thm.jpg
5bd604ee58987d85769fd408d28a27a4
4ee09e322f5c6fcfd92e7882b9a1e60e83deeb11
26767 F20101111_AAAXUC mcclister_d_Page_168.QC.jpg
428ec700c825b425acc5e78d74aae179
17346abf29bdc96ea520d88bc9838738db343113
29465 F20101111_AAAZIX mcclister_d_Page_054.QC.jpg
90e217d766d97d36339ba9231c744165
e17651bb9952e4177a69f8bdcac57871e631b65b
F20101111_AAAWXK mcclister_d_Page_160.txt
502ebcba671bd049d35ce73af70c943a
f5585355352e65586603f21c8e935eeafa5a5ede
93136 F20101111_AAAXUD mcclister_d_Page_208.jpg
d068ccf197dd9fc64213b1cc70b5b8d9
4063af2eadec398f67a74dff538c6db0c03eee15
6796 F20101111_AAAZIY mcclister_d_Page_206thm.jpg
512279c4b04ce6b9402aa2c4494c6c39
01e17ccf246cba90d3646defb3c3d4daff19a8df
54328 F20101111_AAAXUE mcclister_d_Page_186.pro
ee48c7fdcc9be1ac8204c3c91063f28d
1be1e13e4cc3bd21bf2d8a6b0a9cff9418714426
6462 F20101111_AAAWXL mcclister_d_Page_250thm.jpg
c661db406517a56d398c540522a196d7
adfa9acec9e90c93be25a84545a75b3fc2cee820
6432 F20101111_AAAZIZ mcclister_d_Page_122thm.jpg
bbf5ca6d8f130364aa5220578f388d77
8a45a270785b2e98005b178f32a95eaaf30816b0
154378 F20101111_AAAXUF mcclister_d_Page_103.jp2
e1705023d6b18b98a3783981f2884afb
1390590d55495281b01cd9bbf4667c94ce3ff523
6103 F20101111_AAAWXM mcclister_d_Page_063thm.jpg
1ee9aa46fa96a179222835252a04f94e
2a04ac0ffc8e142b81d2f482911161a926115dd4
119157 F20101111_AAAXUG mcclister_d_Page_277.jp2
d15d7460ec8255f4b6d481dfb71393ee
93fd50745ec59ee9306b600b011117e4f97fa83d
1051778 F20101111_AAAWXN mcclister_d_Page_055.jp2
8a8a74c31736677382aad507a25635f9
628a21291b4d47bba83ab10ffcbb8d5367b28d9b
F20101111_AAAXUH mcclister_d_Page_150.tif
0ce6ec0b7d3f3a6bf89b652b572f6441
281861dac2f59652d16d2d1a525de96e3adaa2ce
F20101111_AAAYRA mcclister_d_Page_162.tif
639d47ee7d88b860851cf41cce6e3a0c
47b04c28aaf293c1cb9598d4d3ef15401fc616b2
6514 F20101111_AAAWXO mcclister_d_Page_265thm.jpg
444f87fd067f5ec86e7259abc9dd4b03
497b8bf7347ee21ef92deb1eaedc3cf3c7b75523
117885 F20101111_AAAXUI mcclister_d_Page_268.jp2
76a841321766ae106b473391ca0b9b53
ed0a1f24e24baadb6be69a32c0a5869564b5d5eb
F20101111_AAAYRB mcclister_d_Page_166.tif
c6827e4770f2e8c37fd7c3177cb5a1e1
e1d1eeda30401a996b4f4ccda4b0c6666bd510a9
6429 F20101111_AAAWXP mcclister_d_Page_158thm.jpg
cd7ab30b67848258f7e2ba63441b9891
92d693d57dd070a8f2a7d631a9f18594338ec169
30458 F20101111_AAAXUJ mcclister_d_Page_202.QC.jpg
f11b8b00bc13cac5d869639d1653adca
c99695ab6038b3d9816022a069dee0d0a83ca5a5
F20101111_AAAYRC mcclister_d_Page_167.tif
d6cbb93f7e5e940a8e359cc98ec21a08
ce795c2e841913caa2418ae296d5aeb3065405fb
54822 F20101111_AAAWXQ mcclister_d_Page_197.pro
28bd1cb859a79812867c6f58f78aae81
c853989ce69c09586c37e9518975273c840c207e
5937 F20101111_AAAXUK mcclister_d_Page_170thm.jpg
1f283a2ad6fe52d2c396ab1b99b896be
da5d07c20acbb53642275b81d8e081a9a673468d
F20101111_AAAYRD mcclister_d_Page_169.tif
4aed72e577994e4c2be94b35711467c5
d33530efbd9be61931af4fe78254e887e46901ff
97449 F20101111_AAAWXR mcclister_d_Page_290.jpg
41559baacd25878a862a07d7c93b32f8
6d99d173c315ee81f7cdd2e26470c4302bc241d3
118994 F20101111_AAAXUL mcclister_d_Page_258.jp2
68f023719118316ee0c54a5dc5ba181c
735c65075a73c7edb3c371750a482d561a0bc454
F20101111_AAAYRE mcclister_d_Page_170.tif
e24c768937f56b52afc91381b014b870
f0fc9a2d09f17848e1cfbe29e4b14926912c43a6
29896 F20101111_AAAXHA mcclister_d_Page_190.QC.jpg
911063ed0ec54b6096bae2b2900e8223
ad75ce93ff68224e7236a51cbc95f7b0d0cc9c15
6789 F20101111_AAAWXS mcclister_d_Page_199thm.jpg
9060f430d8fe2fc898484c153b07b892
1a2beaa9386e038460933e6fac02c0b86b7ca17a
37610 F20101111_AAAXUM mcclister_d_Page_296.jpg
dbc641f6f7a32ff4f349063546184a4b
8105fdf0f7385ac18ac0b00bda8677fef2b15707
F20101111_AAAYRF mcclister_d_Page_172.tif
e3663f6fa11f61144a9afe8a2346f195
4646d2ef5d00720974ae93a733baaa1085fed558
F20101111_AAAXHB mcclister_d_Page_285.tif
2b98ec59b69f33b4ee7648200daaf8e7
e4988a39de6d16e8a103477f00f34ae5fc62e02c
58354 F20101111_AAAWXT mcclister_d_Page_264.pro
6ef08baa5dcdc6b1d5a0f84be5aee1c8
5ad50be3bd1925f1e2ff434d154164677627553c
1965 F20101111_AAAXUN mcclister_d_Page_203.txt
6f2964dc6136d66e93b31923308a4ffa
759188998eedf835c4e8b27ed2c20f8e8bd56406
F20101111_AAAYRG mcclister_d_Page_174.tif
270929a497401f56b57b07aeefdc557b
44650d8b8afb94448a1bad322451f273669cd0d1
108257 F20101111_AAAXHC mcclister_d_Page_068.jp2
e2d3f8da5dad2d8de959f4b858365615
0b079fed85c46e9306345bb326fd9d3a1d7f6e5c
F20101111_AAAWXU mcclister_d_Page_140.tif
1fd49d53be024212b1bc242f287adbce
79ab2c2a3fd3ad5ab9419256c2cefc141f2fbe04
26335 F20101111_AAAZOA mcclister_d_Page_188.QC.jpg
71d95ce26a581f258a91a78b91a34679
0a4ce8c30e2ca76daffee1e22197ea99f3179e13
F20101111_AAAXUO mcclister_d_Page_193.tif
c02ee57643661fb3e41a62830fc22ad2
20ea065e52cfaddf1778bd391fb5e95a358d4b4b
F20101111_AAAYRH mcclister_d_Page_176.tif
60db679cf99afc00a359131235c7386c
f22cbb3f1df2302d51bcb8bef85279b6aa283599
115611 F20101111_AAAXHD mcclister_d_Page_061.jp2
28751249e8ceec7e10aa058f017716b9
68d99d034387c7178c9888f8fb57a6d86a2e0da4
96405 F20101111_AAAWXV mcclister_d_Page_185.jpg
9498c7a7cb5dab694fced7876df6a9d8
7de245d4ff386ac0344d5d7a11e1fbb37af65a8e
31377 F20101111_AAAZOB mcclister_d_Page_189.QC.jpg
e6bbb0d5d61b16e9d1abd3927d5b5f3d
4e04f1d672e2353f5c274f0921c902988235ef78
105920 F20101111_AAAXUP mcclister_d_Page_134.jpg
5cfc8346e3d9bdf3c3d4320523c75b98
ed989f5ca054b256faab255207bb935b84cd8045
F20101111_AAAYRI mcclister_d_Page_177.tif
a28f26d795034be5cfcd19dccc718464
06b750cdef512a97b77be0ba1e23299e698e014b
27466 F20101111_AAAXHE mcclister_d_Page_075.QC.jpg
cb7931a7a3f677153f91bfcddd88ec4a
76b86727460be0b6fe65d13f69079b1e5808b9fd
28903 F20101111_AAAWXW mcclister_d_Page_185.QC.jpg
8a102946c2c6c2982a54b7a3ed53947b
6baa227f0fd11c3bc3e76333530395774e0219bd
6916 F20101111_AAAZOC mcclister_d_Page_277thm.jpg
0d7792a7a28dd46597acb8f91f0d59f3
d5811f2278c92ab0dd901bd60e001a64d50690cf
61913 F20101111_AAAXUQ mcclister_d_Page_280.pro
a2110c633fa75e96831c47c905a7ffc8
316a4a7fa679ff6d14e6b9cdfeddf669c3579870
F20101111_AAAYRJ mcclister_d_Page_178.tif
692c979aac8c62516a4d6ca4c40a81f0
38c3d557504e3294e5feb300d831bcad23c26920
129881 F20101111_AAAXHF mcclister_d_Page_111.jp2
501b0e7c0b6cf77d97abda2e515ead46
dfa700cbfb5d6043e309faca9466fe7e7eb9c70f
140961 F20101111_AAAWXX mcclister_d_Page_109.jp2
7ddba80673b0a7b7ca7ed8f4bdd53a99
9253a8eea53bfb204414d18278a995c0efaa3172
27465 F20101111_AAAZOD mcclister_d_Page_036.QC.jpg
5e6e80a7680e789b599e5e359efbb548
96f4848426532380760428e094ff86922dfa0a91
128120 F20101111_AAAXUR mcclister_d_Page_037.jp2
eab895858d2525a17cacb19138d2b0e5
bcfee25fe65decd11df9c05557013ec56ffa458f
F20101111_AAAYRK mcclister_d_Page_180.tif
20c967631faa40268fc86c8200ebf829
455880516973e4a279aae2ac011d27e7bdf3418d
2309 F20101111_AAAXHG mcclister_d_Page_164.txt
7925e61bf2a4c4939f5031b010042e76
5f16d38b399a9ba3f3ac352c448cf57c56e62364
2369 F20101111_AAAWXY mcclister_d_Page_281.txt
930353b39b22ff8f410dfe74a5c2b013
0f81e0237e38551e5ad5109ce399eaa3da29b940
7066 F20101111_AAAZOE mcclister_d_Page_103thm.jpg
6a3b9712276c5db460b77d08f916a14d
a6b89d47d4f20a4a1fe0cdea1cf4b218defce8e8
89858 F20101111_AAAYEA mcclister_d_Page_061.jpg
8cdc656c162d260e37fcff2909bfd564
811288c33aa6b47f11a0c9648d361e65d68eadea
124521 F20101111_AAAXUS mcclister_d_Page_266.jp2
6b7dc938306f27832d721c03ee5ae295
2354ca1925652b165cfa396b070cf4880fd431c3
F20101111_AAAYRL mcclister_d_Page_181.tif
3671ecd611ff2285fbef40bdb6852230
78ae765702fcba157e1723cc0e76874bdeb7eaab
29454 F20101111_AAAXHH mcclister_d_Page_042.QC.jpg
1ec05768480ca4778baa7c9361a3278b
3ab97ab60de4c6d123a5d238834566979a2b1d8b
7076 F20101111_AAAWXZ mcclister_d_Page_291thm.jpg
68f933e9799e851d80e643873ba2a954
9184e684044dd7b07ad879f4cc2b8b4a054c2cd5
6598 F20101111_AAAZOF mcclister_d_Page_042thm.jpg
aa4c3cef5c03ba8b68bdefd4d670768d
41e02820eeb23fe8992534946b183d9527f7ff33
97903 F20101111_AAAYEB mcclister_d_Page_065.jpg
7ea7f923add679a14957773513034640
6715ff4482b171f25b54ec5978401bb669e992a2
332 F20101111_AAAXUT mcclister_d_Page_267.txt
344f1867475370e22a3eb5e5f850f0f5
b8338bca5f858e7a10e0331892e15d0adc4e474e
F20101111_AAAYRM mcclister_d_Page_182.tif
4e2a48afb8a0a0c1e3b8424e31d81a19
5f16080a25699ac177b759ee9dd09197c10068c2
94810 F20101111_AAAXHI mcclister_d_Page_279.jpg
79ae5e590d484ee2fbb43ed74f3e5cc2
e10f79d64d5f1750bb7e8823edcf8cda6e37edcf
34864 F20101111_AAAZOG mcclister_d_Page_010.QC.jpg
5446ef796fdbf9c27581418d1a62f108
23aba437fa6a096cc5407d3a6fdfdc7288a0cb16
86568 F20101111_AAAYEC mcclister_d_Page_066.jpg
a9bd7b4a545a220f5771672f89f77c45
5b7798f4a5a7ecdb87bd34d8400a3f2387efca54
2154 F20101111_AAAXUU mcclister_d_Page_197.txt
aa0010d8cb55fde217ea02269a577157
ca80d4d6085abf26c9206f5a288cc030a6bb6f15
F20101111_AAAYRN mcclister_d_Page_184.tif
05390b4102b0ea16529effa29888032e
31821f8f87d8520addafcbfb8a12868237ff1b13
F20101111_AAAXHJ mcclister_d_Page_103.tif
48e2953a7805c8903676eadb9e6a4047
d7319638faa86b802196022fd5ed0686beac4628
30498 F20101111_AAAZOH mcclister_d_Page_173.QC.jpg
16a7659a229dbabff9691978dbcd2542
f9609d8793f67fdf0c44fd4ee2220f6f818b2399
86774 F20101111_AAAYED mcclister_d_Page_067.jpg
458de28ce7eba3d84f2813af0953d4fe
2bc9951c826a31938bde1301950c6e6182400c5d
120175 F20101111_AAAXUV mcclister_d_Page_207.jp2
7440767303f5c34549eb7fa03995f238
6c022af106f0b1101ef4d6084f54d53917b8db0a
F20101111_AAAYRO mcclister_d_Page_185.tif
6fc74208723c85ac1f2886e1c2e013ba
0a0af1e1cc7406bb6fb9f5c6ed1ae115c1376571
116296 F20101111_AAAXHK mcclister_d_Page_222.jp2
7dcde20e3e2010e1d917bc17ffd1113c
691ac64246e53b8b06084e6a99c16f4aee1db42b
F20101111_AAAZOI mcclister_d_Page_216thm.jpg
6883ec8ac4bd2f1a481ab15d647f2a0d
dc0189dabaec6729b3cdf271ccf2ac08a610a401
104033 F20101111_AAAYEE mcclister_d_Page_070.jpg
4345aa0c85d38b4cf9ccb58d6e80b9ea
31660bd44a67da7e5bb8692e2126e94f2b0eddf3
140130 F20101111_AAAXUW mcclister_d_Page_106.jp2
fd359c3d2b84d7434f8e124a4689bfe0
aa3bf98ffd87e13c8a5db513ee0da7dca5fdc3f1
F20101111_AAAYRP mcclister_d_Page_186.tif
679c9f0ac562daf2324ce9069f92a75f
0c041cfe4321e6faf0864da6a51235b361e65dd1
119262 F20101111_AAAXHL mcclister_d_Page_236.jp2
0efd8362893604ba9c85e425f5d102e2
42a7aaee10d67ed96003b29599926a9fad4c87b8
1097 F20101111_AAAZOJ mcclister_d_Page_003thm.jpg
b0b4e0e62fa2cf6b75fb694965a36bd0
c63401a7265d0386b9c7085553f785f4cf50f426
92038 F20101111_AAAYEF mcclister_d_Page_073.jpg
b9bd5e4c0dc9192a820cb1029825d2d2
2245d514d725abd562f9879bf2065207fca68c68
F20101111_AAAXUX mcclister_d_Page_151.tif
4b3b542a7b5e402928a2ec29893c3018
6cfc5b4425783632281426c8c4109e34e1777552
F20101111_AAAYRQ mcclister_d_Page_188.tif
692eec6badf83decc2c469c5d72d711d
1effa86e95947a53a7f84139b873d040728aaae0
F20101111_AAAXHM mcclister_d_Page_223.tif
f882f95ae95a85722fe97076699d2667
7e78842433d46f8b062b27e77752f1181bc47a36
29026 F20101111_AAAZOK mcclister_d_Page_038.QC.jpg
b1728fe3d650f3560cca78a8908f4634
3831dc911e5e1fe7929324b5b993383cec8f1714
90256 F20101111_AAAYEG mcclister_d_Page_074.jpg
a9081cea891e364a4ac20020fabdf511
c85d581f942453486f8ce4c86d6a720369b3ed8f
136231 F20101111_AAAXUY mcclister_d_Page_112.jp2
ba68281d048d4067994ac915f7813f87
47bb2f010ec9c7a976d5e6e32cc5337b6abb8184
F20101111_AAAYRR mcclister_d_Page_189.tif
927aef45f04212988703e024a9540188
45c851cf18eaf3611931fde82938184142409697
61630 F20101111_AAAXHN mcclister_d_Page_283.pro
f743f5a97afaeba941cedd6afbd9301c
f09bc839961552d4cc006a00c7475ec9bead5e7a
462 F20101111_AAAZOL mcclister_d_Page_002thm.jpg
64573e398dcd35e0829d2f7607c00230
bc3a8b54bc25227ec23bbf911d3e556c97344e6a
98198 F20101111_AAAYEH mcclister_d_Page_077.jpg
dc474069fe9aa29bd58b751669303633
0ea0cb139b25896ab2b503087dc40b4d6578ca9f
6616 F20101111_AAAXUZ mcclister_d_Page_258thm.jpg
87e0ef21ffb5ea6385db2b234df4d702
462c13f189b5d20c22048dba78884f4ef51451b9
2623 F20101111_AAAZBA mcclister_d_Page_040.txt
42db3afe127133e44dada66dbcc56937
2eceec74b0f03ef5a00474eb90610fb1684635b9
F20101111_AAAYRS mcclister_d_Page_191.tif
d0ef893c369f73895e253b109ee0cfd6
d1c9b34434b03d297977f4133042c99596913ca1
144267 F20101111_AAAXHO mcclister_d_Page_021.jp2
d0a1ed3c0a41592e094956cc082c08bc
d03cd6a8ddfc60827b1aa26e04610464cc0c6f19
29360 F20101111_AAAZOM mcclister_d_Page_263.QC.jpg
db11923862284409bd9bc5a819977187
2f4e159c7e4ba9e819ef9e1d9fcecaacd1d8c947
90074 F20101111_AAAYEI mcclister_d_Page_078.jpg
9cf02b8d86a12a3dee1b42e06c4c2265
49ee429de0bea36b06259d76904defa51e0dc37b
F20101111_AAAZBB mcclister_d_Page_041.txt
87433b29a568a6d836e4ada23a8c7be9
ebeaae270e8a1702c9733ad07acf235c7ac9b8d1
F20101111_AAAYRT mcclister_d_Page_196.tif
cbcb21d975c489b91ac79e3d5821233c
66dd6a5703ab51d501712f1af3470cffd8933a54
52035 F20101111_AAAXHP mcclister_d_Page_205.pro
b92d8ce682150b7610b7f1e5d4cb634e
6a06c6506f642e4670599014f45f8790ae7822e8
26861 F20101111_AAAZON mcclister_d_Page_142.QC.jpg
8bee8a2156dc1e96b52894d70ec6d53a
3ec35b24ba8e7e8e6b90fb728b4a06d9214de4fe
95508 F20101111_AAAYEJ mcclister_d_Page_079.jpg
7fdfec1bcc446b3786c378d20fdaee6d
7a8c45659f8b5ae0624ccc9a5c8747068a35a809
2126 F20101111_AAAZBC mcclister_d_Page_043.txt
a04346a1fb0bcf24fef5cee4b213b42c
b7b5d5f906a58879afddef95e9178c205eb47ab6
F20101111_AAAYRU mcclister_d_Page_197.tif
67ad131c81293518e40c66d2da730a1e
748745e2308d9360d4b2054a2922bada0eaccfac
6845 F20101111_AAAXHQ mcclister_d_Page_024thm.jpg
5afd63c7a6837c1787bdad3e9916a41b
a30ca59941d94e6b482a0e6264754bdf8616c869
28251 F20101111_AAAZOO mcclister_d_Page_009.QC.jpg
beba3772fb24cdea988161e67a11a876
4fc26b9973f32761fd112fa7940317f7b6243814
90359 F20101111_AAAYEK mcclister_d_Page_082.jpg
0a120dfb9dfd21e435bc80f0a4d59e76
5bf21dbbcc1e3ed4307a2da85b3d77dcec95ead1
F20101111_AAAZBD mcclister_d_Page_044.txt
efed74475f700c2c3352d81c5c2e4472
1d4a5ceb50168d052bcf6e9c03ee7c3e103a1e76
F20101111_AAAYRV mcclister_d_Page_198.tif
711de3eda826b9a82541f39a60eec2a6
06fe4c3b301b6de122eec3700fe8e50f244542b8
114743 F20101111_AAAXHR mcclister_d_Page_114.jp2
1f8f4888a1f186e04bfab5dd79efb43b
8bc141b7ee7a3225f56ebeaea2523b9eceb58aa5
7271 F20101111_AAAZOP mcclister_d_Page_032thm.jpg
f75c822e051583bf41b190121c0a9728
59a147fc60cdb23aa38ee8e1234261fe010842d9
81970 F20101111_AAAYEL mcclister_d_Page_083.jpg
9221f3eb69928d47d6fd485eafbba157
a37ec1fc9bae85b965d01ec35bdb173084a41f15
1701 F20101111_AAAZBE mcclister_d_Page_046.txt
997efa79dd36fdce59599c8ac36f5246
45f06786f518fa60c16ac37e926ffde632f63e57
F20101111_AAAYRW mcclister_d_Page_200.tif
293f334d4ff9dec3a740aa9bc4fa66a8
a7433d5bddd736fe8b8838c17f5436de62456e4d
111603 F20101111_AAAXHS mcclister_d_Page_275.jp2
a11b44a7456ff8740b566259ba737f95
8d9dc37e79275186e9641554318a24966bfe9267
28839 F20101111_AAAZOQ mcclister_d_Page_120.QC.jpg
2746f3ef21c48d2f643208bd02b2b905
11689323897bdb14214a3325feed3f6386f0a6d8
97151 F20101111_AAAYEM mcclister_d_Page_085.jpg
39bf429548cdaae2ef2edf500bab10d8
2bff5d1e1a286e5bafc55a01177bbb7171280b3b
2245 F20101111_AAAZBF mcclister_d_Page_047.txt
cb386809b3d8819b714b9d915b8bd354
83e876ae1aa83a90e885a1dca14f9dbca4210e26
F20101111_AAAYRX mcclister_d_Page_201.tif
b26a1a7dae0a40bbea30cbc65602e12c
c9c9ba4e6f4bd7def65c0628c3b4eea10d24c95b
100456 F20101111_AAAXHT mcclister_d_Page_034.jpg
17e45e72f5059af20aebca0de317cd51
d2bc36a6d70a1e7af1d6f708afe363c9f4fe58f8
5044 F20101111_AAAZOR mcclister_d_Page_238thm.jpg
f81c206254e81c1215ba55fb01fd792d
d3fd16f357b6fc13286ed7315ce0ee3b580c750b
89175 F20101111_AAAYEN mcclister_d_Page_089.jpg
51139ea841a012dd02d22569f9ef88c5
7c48cdfee77e7a4744b6830de44d4f52c6dafabb
2286 F20101111_AAAZBG mcclister_d_Page_049.txt
d250d7e8cb60c431afbd320c177f189f
4b0750639c01a8284066c3f8790a0ed46cbd93fc
F20101111_AAAYRY mcclister_d_Page_202.tif
6042353d0d8917839fe82c2aa706f001
b43a89d7b3de407ac809ebb5f7c8ee340519dd4a
6948 F20101111_AAAZOS mcclister_d_Page_273thm.jpg
80b48b3ab16ab6432d0ce30b0766bc0f
118b7be45de14cb9baa5b7cd4b13cdaee2de5a2a
91491 F20101111_AAAYEO mcclister_d_Page_090.jpg
1c63b5a0fa2501c56f2df234b8b70b8a
1ab11962644577c4e7c4463b4e1143100825e704
2219 F20101111_AAAZBH mcclister_d_Page_052.txt
5414a2168d262e9dc614be21435221b5
38ff40b73442ed116576f20f73b4a9ac1f854c10
F20101111_AAAYRZ mcclister_d_Page_203.tif
2fcc981188436f10e729be5278a64887
3a1f8948713d741233447c667b3aafcc8cf5978a
113669 F20101111_AAAXHU mcclister_d_Page_182.jp2
2fcad4bf9e8c93d1c1e5a26500fc3e86
c58a9c034c31dfda9583fc6b801d95e889e43ba1
6850 F20101111_AAAZOT mcclister_d_Page_064thm.jpg
36dee3ce46147deacafd19356ad288c8
2fcd1d1951dbf64b1415418153c2acac72e84bda
99095 F20101111_AAAYEP mcclister_d_Page_091.jpg
ebdb89b574b78dfd3a9404ec8a04b003
c22303524bf2e7f793f70b63e8fe063322c03365
F20101111_AAAZBI mcclister_d_Page_053.txt
000a8592aac9207b831baf5b105c2d48
1488e7f8de18cf75fb4bbb1163467ec35365a729
1499 F20101111_AAAXHV mcclister_d_Page_006.txt
e6902ae7010446e5765c70897b5e4555
8dd18cff851ac3485bb82da836218f7674ddd427
F20101111_AAAZOU mcclister_d_Page_286thm.jpg
1fac2523b620b115573f13271a184e2e
c8c10f0c6047c9ea60f2c8b999a0159b1d3bba5e
2438 F20101111_AAAZBJ mcclister_d_Page_054.txt
72b47963921b00dca2e0343ea9f7cf3f
f68a7462b81d11a56e5aa9e25f98ea019c598db0
6966 F20101111_AAAXHW mcclister_d_Page_252thm.jpg
8044aa783f61f5d2f6c72b13b074d85a
6db6272fa3fa52cb156739d593220220b70d713f
29831 F20101111_AAAZOV mcclister_d_Page_253.QC.jpg
da72320dff2b692087c28e2e0c0b1abd
a253c90e2996b9dc3bed7befb128beb08be94153
74750 F20101111_AAAYEQ mcclister_d_Page_092.jpg
699db90bb220cc5cfd4a002592f39b56
b632312ba13bdc882123f6e0b43ca9232768b4f6
2828 F20101111_AAAZBK mcclister_d_Page_055.txt
2534a3cbd63a95418af9bc068f77f34c
b530e64e22b1e97e0f824ae0726b68e3c4300876
7187 F20101111_AAAXHX mcclister_d_Page_023thm.jpg
91981a4df18668df5f7cd805295e6c76
b5900d5a9fc1099f5bd812657ec041a7083f99b9
28581 F20101111_AAAZOW mcclister_d_Page_172.QC.jpg
ad7409935e5cc6f183f57351b05694b0
0ae4bf32901cf69c5df45d91c1fe94a4359e0a9c
85349 F20101111_AAAYER mcclister_d_Page_093.jpg
d0841923678d4ed8952820b13328e35e
41213b95d268435592bbabdb04bd9d011a793615
F20101111_AAAZBL mcclister_d_Page_057.txt
635f193c94832d6f048fa18ea2758c09
40ed5ff99bdca317e4c096f6204404a32838f309
F20101111_AAAXHY mcclister_d_Page_181.txt
d7850413e9e06e5d62b53e71da87220a
b3fbf9851f9806ae5dea7b5f7b8f8d39b783bf29
5801 F20101111_AAAZOX mcclister_d_Page_153thm.jpg
7f3d9a4a302f3a962d63fb5e2bf17d74
7e2744fa3d8e31dbdba74372f4fb68535ae061c3
100324 F20101111_AAAYES mcclister_d_Page_095.jpg
5c3e60b1a0801f2a8da1c2e2debb2b0e
efd93ba89e6854acef3543e99b6e1b14703f1f35
6376 F20101111_AAAXHZ mcclister_d_Page_138thm.jpg
b04e22f987bfa3dcd229bf5da7d41cd5
a7f1699778d824ab8cc56e16f11c46f248c0d9b2
6737 F20101111_AAAZOY mcclister_d_Page_279thm.jpg
d2da6ca8ee872333b98618c36c462c51
83c4ea2e4df37ce30aeb9123ec56a3ae5dc2dcaf
96285 F20101111_AAAYET mcclister_d_Page_096.jpg
a2a723a34603a90f39595cb25e7b2ce0
0dd4eb54038a5ddb3c897e2aea290b85608b2585
2186 F20101111_AAAZBM mcclister_d_Page_061.txt
259098fd2dc0e4dd64b51d614945998d
143f685f31014b7f4186910091c466a9243b5ee3
113477 F20101111_AAAYEU mcclister_d_Page_098.jpg
c556e16028fe55531a71beae8f2aa1e6
f83fa1bbca21ac6a43e2ffcb062b0000772a7157
2385 F20101111_AAAZBN mcclister_d_Page_062.txt
7e953268375391b251834d8984e184e0
2912ca45e4921d57f628879a428108d3de5be48e
31193 F20101111_AAAZOZ mcclister_d_Page_166.QC.jpg
1ca093202893994371c24bad69a7d354
6541b283a15efba0e4b1be58504e320ba97f4554
92470 F20101111_AAAYEV mcclister_d_Page_100.jpg
d948a3e3c9e6f9719cda49992264f516
414667b611d2e6cddaabd73d134e6cef1b14bdce
2431 F20101111_AAAZBO mcclister_d_Page_064.txt
2797c28a3b42c0d019561d2c96deda18
d9273406f4a54e633350d6feda639a20c0ec2445
95651 F20101111_AAAYEW mcclister_d_Page_104.jpg
8cb414d2341aa2c1c29c119c72617071
0b1ba3a7e7526a26be5226f42235779bc66e34db
57338 F20101111_AAAYXA mcclister_d_Page_149.pro
de7fa4b11168c7d99c2637756e964465
a3219fd6ba3f08d8b172e7e3d488223061cfecd7
2378 F20101111_AAAZBP mcclister_d_Page_065.txt
a55eeb7dd80bfa4a0cbc341e847192bf
5cfbc70baccb8b1652ee1b6660b365240d61a110
109266 F20101111_AAAYEX mcclister_d_Page_105.jpg
5791e14e1c7fb3b9c940d33d5e535cce
51f019374cddaed4967b3056a3fc5ca27db0fd05
59395 F20101111_AAAYXB mcclister_d_Page_151.pro
64377688edbdf462a4be5d0577b79e38
59c93b73c741ab1600619e89bec4c070addca7f3
2249 F20101111_AAAZBQ mcclister_d_Page_067.txt
947af3e8775421219ab5d44b70eebb49
28e26db25c6c1559cc3ff6c781692f30dad1849d
109786 F20101111_AAAYEY mcclister_d_Page_109.jpg
3ca144cf3684ed8bb042547eeaef6654
47c75f7caf39854c738a86fbda47882389557cef
47449 F20101111_AAAYXC mcclister_d_Page_153.pro
5bc4a8a0e15883aa103afff859d3ba9d
f85344e606d97d83cf897f70549a265c951b4f40
2060 F20101111_AAAZBR mcclister_d_Page_069.txt
437d9113a9841435f380f4862c96bf57
69be3e87464598292d3f511d6ba9b149c2ddce39
91327 F20101111_AAAYEZ mcclister_d_Page_110.jpg
f652de4e60b47f2a63cc715b8d739586
c5c4b09ffd0aa0fdea123a7ef3576009626ef460
2602 F20101111_AAAZBS mcclister_d_Page_070.txt
2d39983a48d01c4e9584eb79645f489b
5af878a9210281a14f2b571809fbcd49e8c45d87
54908 F20101111_AAAYXD mcclister_d_Page_157.pro
431443e412a2ee063ae3a7eea2c75e33
c0e316b7d46d4f719c3e244fd382006709e38387
2207 F20101111_AAAZBT mcclister_d_Page_071.txt
3c0b6c24c56c26b0b753f35954902a76
093d3ac389f22fb0abef1673eae5f65fca226ac5
51441 F20101111_AAAYXE mcclister_d_Page_159.pro
a339b36558052cb0068dbce77a4a0da6
d87309d902163493f00729a7f7c8f194149e2b6c
F20101111_AAAZBU mcclister_d_Page_072.txt
aad9f7f88e7b10ab14cbcf698cf11517
12394b684ca7fe984083c397a90f1f9346a7c1c8
2645 F20101111_AAAXNA mcclister_d_Page_260.txt
62c793c06001e8bd6bf4574fa76700b6
0fda91adb43e6e098afea16ce0c3af4e9896b522
57629 F20101111_AAAYXF mcclister_d_Page_160.pro
890b1d209aa03735519fca72dac966ca
91492ed6c305d55cbf73202588158043409ae7c6
2167 F20101111_AAAZBV mcclister_d_Page_073.txt
028e929f27616dae7b84a79ce4d5411f
35b9e973e6c80a0bc51f5a56281ddacb6d931994
96667 F20101111_AAAXNB mcclister_d_Page_042.jpg
09134f2e7a37ab3e1e35489313f7192e
cea88f51c04d83545698824c00b38cc7a51d52de
71501 F20101111_AAAYXG mcclister_d_Page_161.pro
2e079a46ebb835b29ccd24abd262feab
a587f3887a40f31f4ee6765f08a62bbccf6976a1
F20101111_AAAZBW mcclister_d_Page_074.txt
30c9691bb79ba5328e45795a1df340f0
a06345a9930848589ccf0762f29ae7de477971eb
F20101111_AAAXNC mcclister_d_Page_218.txt
84a03d0df2cc9f5dc639bcd92bfc6407
6759fcb4e2bf9aac07c60ffce27fc1a394c229c0
51481 F20101111_AAAYXH mcclister_d_Page_162.pro
d6a03141e52a81f474cc80fd42b551d2
6027bb9820d799d361f160d49fbbf7e0109f5955
2482 F20101111_AAAZBX mcclister_d_Page_075.txt
1a0be26b56fa0730d437472157a7e649
b57e5025be7e8e3769e707efab77b0ec730e7f1d
7149 F20101111_AAAXND mcclister_d_Page_012thm.jpg
90d56d4889c02b78a8c138c4877b5b27
1ec6afe9c5c1df1eecdf288ac49dc49bba18f758
68684 F20101111_AAAYXI mcclister_d_Page_163.pro
9f4f049d8389598e4acc4fe149d12297
d7b3dd7e05a5d9a4d7bb197eee600697ac0c3b67
F20101111_AAAZBY mcclister_d_Page_076.txt
6bec18c2ffcd7ab8d473499b89f84696
d317eba63efd5ad2e5b71c74081283216a12254b
99079 F20101111_AAAXNE mcclister_d_Page_007.jp2
7447468a1da2893fa4feff639751c55a
27ed73c37edee5796a5d32690bebb83bf131fb0f
58821 F20101111_AAAYXJ mcclister_d_Page_164.pro
18317d9cf8f6caf9b11ccab10dbfcd54
02a6be5c3652375bea16ae5b3f028f8e332b271e
F20101111_AAAZBZ mcclister_d_Page_079.txt
107f95d3e300da9e792e7498e53155ee
376fe6eec2b4083c2b5d7e6c0a5e6944be4f32f9
7402 F20101111_AAAXNF mcclister_d_Page_010thm.jpg
f57033d992a0297e4a73fafe73e88f7d
564c59e64d8fabb3e850e2609d28a7fb7098ea6d
55846 F20101111_AAAYXK mcclister_d_Page_165.pro
6b2c6e67ca6c57c6548cb62ff920483f
64a7c9ecaadd8c20c2bf42501a12ad42b324cfaa
127083 F20101111_AAAXNG mcclister_d_Page_247.jp2
1cb11c8526276fd8d589e3e81d201d90
aac6888842935aba5745d6b05d1b571d0956fd95
65270 F20101111_AAAYXL mcclister_d_Page_166.pro
c3013f18c15b3acbcd99c191875e61e6
89e3c1ba409435d9b828b666fb3590d973a9ab7f
124285 F20101111_AAAWQO mcclister_d_Page_077.jp2
239569439d62f05be793eba313f47215
540ff2f6d6d7a77abf83f509569fb1f91f275f69
6753 F20101111_AAAXNH mcclister_d_Page_139thm.jpg
7bb15caae10a64a8e7eb9849f0de5273
be159488dd7eb20d1b560771d0a5c88096dca5ea
133355 F20101111_AAAYKA mcclister_d_Page_070.jp2
41be04bb71f4e339123fc1573783e61f
3f5a6ec5fc74199cb58731f319663086bdc8fb12
65784 F20101111_AAAYXM mcclister_d_Page_167.pro
acec8f799639581763edcb0d8d2def3e
01ef7a63610e6c6a2e412553ef4cf2dd340e1292
90096 F20101111_AAAWQP mcclister_d_Page_210.jpg
ea638f1949adb70aaeeefffea2a9bb3e
281d3398dbdf785e1abaa6155ca88781280fa621
2077 F20101111_AAAXNI mcclister_d_Page_168.txt
5596a103abf2c5e02df033fef242c04f
45cfecfbc3c3299c445a8660f83ed564c8cbe902
120773 F20101111_AAAYKB mcclister_d_Page_072.jp2
9b2486694656451cfecb82b8611ba4e6
82ca7d86666acfe3e182bf2424ad736bc4052144
47156 F20101111_AAAYXN mcclister_d_Page_170.pro
fbc12b1e985457b8514d4f504cd6850d
508b88f70db67c50f2249873eb87e2133fa501fe
F20101111_AAAWQQ mcclister_d_Page_013thm.jpg
da50cb175779fcf6aeefe6c3dfc19b58
25a319329ed0a3c6065a6b6602ddea798028acdc
F20101111_AAAXNJ mcclister_d_Page_088.tif
7587e22bd781706ed746bc624678c636
186e2e520e1a6b2e1b3268d22880f5f1bb8b35cd
118877 F20101111_AAAYKC mcclister_d_Page_078.jp2
a67b3d3964fc85fe1e176db74fa509e7
0d62e79dd9761cb6e3daa3a17b3953df9a04a580
57531 F20101111_AAAYXO mcclister_d_Page_171.pro
cef33856f27ffbd66bc4bffe086950c2
e35803832f5050d2bed7f3e7c9c1e5e24f5645ee
F20101111_AAAWQR mcclister_d_Page_226thm.jpg
d0ba336a469380b43b204562fe4a6371
7152457e8e544516750a07b14603b4c04a7c5bad
2717 F20101111_AAAXNK mcclister_d_Page_032.txt
ce103fab68adcdc11512b5dc150efced
9b7cef72ff6b4fad18fad008c1f0354813f3553c
106261 F20101111_AAAYKD mcclister_d_Page_083.jp2
18ae89c49fd3a17a9994267e38d27640
ce8a67376f9598e507d0b37aac592c79a0a5296a
87188 F20101111_AAAXAA mcclister_d_Page_116.jp2
393d47f0c4e54f3eb66e2765fed9f271
5e94f0a809df7c7824c245e7568d1984058488a1
61932 F20101111_AAAYXP mcclister_d_Page_173.pro
bd55823f5090a1d495b26d37174ed203
2b432628a012663ee96fbe004bf74bc6eef84bb8
54731 F20101111_AAAWQS mcclister_d_Page_239.pro
49aaf338e32cf09d6647c51510d5a314
ac18554e30f6d17a8065a2b492070f79397ef747
104384 F20101111_AAAXNL mcclister_d_Page_018.jp2
eb67def3b313ee6c59528f885801b6f8
e0eeb7984a09db38e3797195917cbf2dd3af6a62
125267 F20101111_AAAYKE mcclister_d_Page_085.jp2
d03eb86cd77d0d04c02c902c9c8fa034
076de84c7f69409d40d03f5e07e4f7daa4c6412a
F20101111_AAAXAB mcclister_d_Page_096.tif
d3acf60afe21daf0b61cf2297b53eb24
8621ec099f577b9db9f5f1229111961c33f8817d
57353 F20101111_AAAYXQ mcclister_d_Page_174.pro
9ca80afbf8c23864787da5bd42e32444
547378ef309236ed7fe764f1452a1e9ebce5ebe3
26554 F20101111_AAAWQT mcclister_d_Page_192.QC.jpg
cc6ca6dd45393606efc2b4d663feea25
491b7e7da7b298eec304934fcd6fb54cfac58030
6279 F20101111_AAAXNM mcclister_d_Page_019thm.jpg
c89a032042bc0ab1ed45a97324374e82
bac783bd83979b6aefc5c8f597a8ed9db3ffe938
117429 F20101111_AAAYKF mcclister_d_Page_087.jp2
31f535576d5e51d26af69fc529da76e1
fdc02faa4978f1a18ee29ba4a24d078520dd696e
38081 F20101111_AAAXAC mcclister_d_Page_006.jpg
b7c8d83e006b83170dd79ca85edfbe77
e8930e8085d24dfd595f60269757868c89f196e6
61049 F20101111_AAAYXR mcclister_d_Page_176.pro
05150e7731f75235f3062a0e9070a5d9
659edc5a86a1c06dcadf7099dcc24ba9da91a410
54323 F20101111_AAAWQU mcclister_d_Page_057.pro
895c6396300039e991eb11f33e1793c3
b30b430433f02777b3adf6a2820affbb760231b7
90389 F20101111_AAAXNN mcclister_d_Page_071.jpg
2a0d32a875e7091d07d73bcc566113ac
8b6ab362f4f4c6c2f7d4ea427b70bce4f085e87d
117946 F20101111_AAAYKG mcclister_d_Page_088.jp2
6d05115883d7fa0273810be768367aea
01dccd7bde69f51b8a712a8453db3a7aec8c6427
28992 F20101111_AAAZHA mcclister_d_Page_149.QC.jpg
84acd563a6f80629774b02a63e80faf4
e82c8af4783fa7d16ab763b95eccd4e5b0b1a4ce
2313 F20101111_AAAXAD mcclister_d_Page_125.txt
48f7140c7f066c88a4a019b492b511ca
f59df87b5a1732704b319a301812ae92d5257f53
55744 F20101111_AAAYXS mcclister_d_Page_177.pro
2e063bb14c637d228b8fb7d801b2952f
00392a03e4da4e5b0059f8242c3ba633936d3e7a
89443 F20101111_AAAWQV mcclister_d_Page_043.jpg
87273876bff664b2713ae55d85a7fa99
86be6e5235b796d3393cc3800b6ae820e50da84a
27328 F20101111_AAAXNO mcclister_d_Page_081.QC.jpg
7edc02bec0adab2b9d6abae3fd6ed1fb
7684052d541f36e7101b99bc56d9570228eeca2d
127338 F20101111_AAAYKH mcclister_d_Page_091.jp2
b7e1e718569bae80a77c3d3b2ecaa721
c271571aa96772f0e771cb5f0776faae852f746d
30622 F20101111_AAAZHB mcclister_d_Page_141.QC.jpg
2191cba2d59cf74a93621a443a3e5e3b
d31a02af4c5a113252da6cb4f0c630447fd0cd2b
F20101111_AAAXAE mcclister_d_Page_025.QC.jpg
d92bc3e6531a490964e8b4a9a3be2be5
c44c4439e3723fcb7cd36272b2e563eef9ad0bd1
58804 F20101111_AAAYXT mcclister_d_Page_178.pro
745cddd68a1c9271931ab4b1e9d7f5a8
b83f86b39223dc4d305adb257db8fc2af53ac948
6644 F20101111_AAAWQW mcclister_d_Page_200thm.jpg
03f74c249ea84460e3e76a64dd1962e8
608f9b38444b74898345aaa710593ebab59e00b2
30497 F20101111_AAAXNP mcclister_d_Page_119.QC.jpg
61775f9100402cb0b507e9f4deb9fc63
5606fc0bce0f49e70d07b99385c555350fe86195
F20101111_AAAYKI mcclister_d_Page_093.jp2
cecfe503071a4c3c2f9b3a8b7b4308e0
d6222ba8cfdf89491530e9b613fa72c67f3d520e
6824 F20101111_AAAZHC mcclister_d_Page_282thm.jpg
1f33f6aba4bf83e8712749489bc3de94
c33971f8d80f4c349ae177982f2994b6b0c8fb51
57835 F20101111_AAAXAF mcclister_d_Page_285.pro
cc9527c17caff11efe61dfa26d7f1651
0652e76dafa92c35407a0a71a01bb318c6216770
58089 F20101111_AAAYXU mcclister_d_Page_179.pro
c9371e04cd1f626eb73010ac971f15be
ec66131d91cba10705c0736deca119df32c68695
25094 F20101111_AAAWQX mcclister_d_Page_018.QC.jpg
5032abf9b6b801ad5c782499688dab58
049236d777c6cd63263cb128ee0be0b97ac926d6
7035 F20101111_AAAXNQ mcclister_d_Page_108thm.jpg
7865a9f1d790c169b98e7f454ef0c336
075c1253139cbf74ff41d806ea2a9a4d84c47888
124257 F20101111_AAAYKJ mcclister_d_Page_096.jp2
5717c0c9fe7bd9752217f090246a12be
2dc4c7e5a0bb0dda47a628b10f9d3637703edeaa
6701 F20101111_AAAZHD mcclister_d_Page_149thm.jpg
5790f4bb698ba33e78644482b69fe77d
6500ccd1896d757024ab63554f12e6bb4d6e3966
F20101111_AAAXAG mcclister_d_Page_247.tif
c22da9df86f8195cd728ac2224dd49e2
082cb6643e59bffc4c7b58eb45d3af9189dedae1
26467 F20101111_AAAYXV mcclister_d_Page_180.pro
de13986bc50e59a16f4ac58c1a29ef51
ef4c398b66efa13172b23f6b1fe55f3c270f7a15
29037 F20101111_AAAWQY mcclister_d_Page_139.QC.jpg
285d2e312086ff9caa13611d433237fb
bbe149136ebfd9ca9a5df5a8515db876227a7bd0
2184 F20101111_AAAXNR mcclister_d_Page_210.txt
4d029aab01033e9b72147eda779aab09
09f78009f20201811cf4ed83eb85f68978601c78
128647 F20101111_AAAYKK mcclister_d_Page_097.jp2
70e84eb7236f6c48a04896b584c56f22
b28e618cba1357cdebbcf1f84402c86d69d9fb8f
25618 F20101111_AAAZHE mcclister_d_Page_013.QC.jpg
91ad798336485a6a02f9443809aac3f8
51896fe4c1a114b67b1c3f35d6dda0a0b1c51d24
28745 F20101111_AAAXAH mcclister_d_Page_289.QC.jpg
3f687707ca52ff9596e0692488fab8b4
14ed2fc78f873871ac6605748e2e1bae9e364939
53574 F20101111_AAAYXW mcclister_d_Page_181.pro
c39725af558e07b92253c9ab834dddd2
3d50c450e655e7a0107131c564af1e6cdafb3285
F20101111_AAAWQZ mcclister_d_Page_118.tif
64f4957884f9e5dd597227aedecc0db6
30a9483ed2b182d3ae357f6ef404f423588ddf87
54607 F20101111_AAAXNS mcclister_d_Page_240.pro
98d591a2857a7a5e3202dad3b306da76
de5a59ddc49bd24726e757861c8ccba83eff612c
120377 F20101111_AAAYKL mcclister_d_Page_099.jp2
1e6b9cde84369667fe3081a50c955934
d9c877e53baa2c6cd326ea1840e9e7c30145d94f
29195 F20101111_AAAZHF mcclister_d_Page_211.QC.jpg
991006f6d3a2d7113ed9557ca313126f
83c146c3de0747e2e168a3ffdddde4b2e63e2cb5
2194 F20101111_AAAXAI mcclister_d_Page_258.txt
4630796743977c780d6f2c9232d465c1
696c39c991c59866ccbddf71e7b0b92ba5fd0fa5
66446 F20101111_AAAYXX mcclister_d_Page_183.pro
1670779abd0f4bf49c7ccee3713e5dcb
ff88d9ee9dc34f6666d9102f052fdca4a1ffdadc
61449 F20101111_AAAXNT mcclister_d_Page_130.pro
b42f44323f8db7f6e98b66d8e855e47e
26b1ba892f8db74087a8956a16a40a3190469b85
120405 F20101111_AAAYKM mcclister_d_Page_100.jp2
f4d50d354ca5f5a26bd13b36ce47c212
eff1457179b7fc739b423cca5499072c6b39cb0a
26104 F20101111_AAAZHG mcclister_d_Page_045.QC.jpg
201d8c99edfb0faeeba38fad31b98dfd
c51b493fd387deadb4c56aa5e0d514fed625df44
104576 F20101111_AAAXAJ mcclister_d_Page_203.jp2
6dba74de913e0e84e403924e98536d59
8ce2fe396a84d428deb64347a4b3f92b0d3cfb01
64963 F20101111_AAAYXY mcclister_d_Page_184.pro
c91e6e8098312ab2a1266c0622b87db0
6e81621a8f6f724187257b2a46ca3feed9241e25
118269 F20101111_AAAXNU mcclister_d_Page_256.jp2
1f32fec42c1f880859b25d46bb442592
94f806300d50281a1831adabbc69587999a791b0
137932 F20101111_AAAYKN mcclister_d_Page_101.jp2
2cd3ea2def384213c1f87d870e850e42
8a196c7bc0889c9845c371e5a0af50a7fca4c344
7185 F20101111_AAAZHH mcclister_d_Page_189thm.jpg
fca1b24c18b4212b9bbd99f6ab7721c6
1c9cb2c49d5657e07df4ed683f247da16d86c53a
F20101111_AAAXAK mcclister_d_Page_123.tif
311c9c7375fb2739980e1638ad678b89
2fc3af40627a064137f06b12f92e9219603a6fd3
58753 F20101111_AAAYXZ mcclister_d_Page_185.pro
f814fd719924da14796a1322dca94fdc
1647d6f42338e8721c8d450a9774d6e72f3c8675
6964 F20101111_AAAXNV mcclister_d_Page_255thm.jpg
572bdda73f2aa839140bbb55c2fad764
06ea4f99f93d9c83e67d730f2f763ec5499c75a4
118811 F20101111_AAAYKO mcclister_d_Page_102.jp2
67964468b9b4f2e1022c16db8a081840
2382cc07a1231491a5f08a6506786a2858e8fa30
28075 F20101111_AAAZHI mcclister_d_Page_283.QC.jpg
8c92720e472dc05dfbe253470a8e2b21
51d5d1794ad2e42f7915e751b622ae9157dae2bc
6029 F20101111_AAAXAL mcclister_d_Page_018thm.jpg
6e5836d04c18e25375185b550ada92f0
a0400ced5785c6fd8700d83569d8a018fb8ada0c
124930 F20101111_AAAXNW mcclister_d_Page_025.jp2
fb3dcbe72eadc11376c5380fd83db7a9
58ce1bc9f6d85efd021348326ae822933f8c9120
138694 F20101111_AAAYKP mcclister_d_Page_105.jp2
a21082212f7a2097399ab474d159f596
d0912c339420840099db74231f86bd7f4ffdc471
6689 F20101111_AAAZHJ mcclister_d_Page_016thm.jpg
d52c198d3c23fa69e428f1bfbd7ace8c
3dba1d8b71f0817f0d4b0fa60c55243c04cfd9f2
2059 F20101111_AAAXAM mcclister_d_Page_068.txt
418b1051097954da20626dc1a0c5bb04
d7a9f5668f32a4e900cfb5028c69c7a54ac6a5c0
80853 F20101111_AAAXNX mcclister_d_Page_248.jpg
f3e6b499c71565e588fd5d3983145da3
62b98f902ed83cc49066bdd9047fd0f2e4a86f12
118648 F20101111_AAAYKQ mcclister_d_Page_110.jp2
057e8b6386f21bf76ab2a9ee05a428fe
a9aa9fc131660644979caa9d7cde7250c3dab650
28400 F20101111_AAAZHK mcclister_d_Page_082.QC.jpg
a25b97d96799b778ccec3b28331d1237
405bb54107087ea126eebc68b8a20f6aa2835aea
F20101111_AAAXNY mcclister_d_Page_191thm.jpg
7be55704c682155b027f2fb634feec48
cd660d8e987651918d4fe6875cbef05009e44179
121274 F20101111_AAAYKR mcclister_d_Page_115.jp2
2a66d046a0c2319c603ff19bd372e900
45713357efc34af85d87f5e37faaea11eac4ebf1
31231 F20101111_AAAZHL mcclister_d_Page_219.QC.jpg
be945649833a992d754f71f4d6917220
45a4b1c00abef5c96e4c7857106ecf4e7239cfd5
61015 F20101111_AAAXAN mcclister_d_Page_120.pro
3eea2c9de860d68d43440f6ea0188143
d7482552a135a10aaae44451d16fd74c7eaf250f
F20101111_AAAXNZ mcclister_d_Page_065.tif
4ab5959cfb06fa77039c4a0264cb08c6
f8249f477c5e438274c3e0fa4f2be65832583223
109901 F20101111_AAAYKS mcclister_d_Page_117.jp2
7b0de7c5e531f9f7792db80745497850
312eddbf2844c3fd6a4f534d8e7b2c83153fe154
5631 F20101111_AAAZHM mcclister_d_Page_008thm.jpg
865d55436eccf2f6c909cce4c441a9d3
0d5a87cc32304308a112320cd7fdcb304737c59a
53720 F20101111_AAAXAO mcclister_d_Page_231.pro
da50deb30ada6ce50191fc802cf9bcd3
4f9b682a58765b78d751ad072194258fbc6559ec
137048 F20101111_AAAYKT mcclister_d_Page_118.jp2
e21c268323ab1019e09c5871544a39e3
214c0c0d1861586cc192f4dacd912424e3f1da24
6776 F20101111_AAAZHN mcclister_d_Page_100thm.jpg
0736ee5b9cd01855965a23d758d189f9
6747fc4eaddfbeca32e42a94038ee482adc62493
F20101111_AAAWWA mcclister_d_Page_190.tif
f6e9bcb8ba5342338e3d231957b24d1e
fbc0c4e2f60fb1760b6172d864a552f490ad954b
56778 F20101111_AAAXAP mcclister_d_Page_216.pro
5b6754d1d84bbe821eeca2da6da83836
3adc3b6f9e136449b5c0c9020cf79d8e1c0740bb
136960 F20101111_AAAYKU mcclister_d_Page_119.jp2
bf202d5312850a72bf276edd1260079e
2f1fa1ce01ac3c5b30495204c212bb867289048d
6433 F20101111_AAAZHO mcclister_d_Page_049thm.jpg
0005671be898ce1e4054e2ba4c1e7c50
f4bbccdb6a2dc521db095b74cffc47d6bbcfa5b0
2063 F20101111_AAAWWB mcclister_d_Page_162.txt
174c8fd85319e227d2c7f1f8bdfad857
c148aab173626cc314ae763a121564dd91502a65
F20101111_AAAXAQ mcclister_d_Page_127.tif
9e8f17c64472e18429da5205e2d09b28
107d8f206e16ca6f0e6659b797bd36e881349172
126043 F20101111_AAAYKV mcclister_d_Page_120.jp2
d9074d3eda480a04d0396594cb18acfa
33891ec800cd528fd63b8b5a0d614eb25064e336
F20101111_AAAZHP mcclister_d_Page_120thm.jpg
2bbf52cc8c485b804938ab2a82d7f2c2
76e9b39f58e23378830f32a012ab35850e6b34b8
53308 F20101111_AAAWWC mcclister_d_Page_155.pro
0cce4a7422a28f2205c321c15495cc45
5240b53723e7a42421620b7efd6b52786a47748a
87882 F20101111_AAAXAR mcclister_d_Page_227.jpg
5157996a00b302db2b4f8175f3570b64
8325c52207a4cf176d3d0e5b1088895a49a3cd77
30336 F20101111_AAAZHQ mcclister_d_Page_040.QC.jpg
30be24efc5ad073ffc954a22b2926805
f816b71de9887adc9447bcdc964560821a6a23a5
58906 F20101111_AAAWWD mcclister_d_Page_127.pro
bad330d66d0891b346f4907ac49793b8
e0f41268b5e24428706f0a3b75338bc85e44ed7f
98225 F20101111_AAAXAS mcclister_d_Page_075.jpg
da9e6230955474677bc8dfd275815483
aed231831fb410b941a82cea690b5db3b31b001f
112169 F20101111_AAAYKW mcclister_d_Page_122.jp2
630e171a7f9064cdbf25bb82574db28f
2a6f178b8fd2f9ee727cec9699bcff86fcb54ff9
28704 F20101111_AAAZHR mcclister_d_Page_152.QC.jpg
563171d7dc406879e91f0de57c357e8c
641fb112cdf7dafd7a23c297fd255250c81a1192
F20101111_AAAXAT mcclister_d_Page_067.tif
831f6f7dfbbf67e28caac7fabc38354c
944517e49186bd7bc61fd5f4123a2c9767076fa4
119127 F20101111_AAAYKX mcclister_d_Page_123.jp2
4dd68670edfd461ce31ea40f7e664b57
a0a0e49dba81fb0e74a4faf814ecf35f23f389fd
2353 F20101111_AAAWWE mcclister_d_Page_253.txt
e9347f448a771ed39497b289f300bf67
c136572cf3a91dd630e50ec52adba3eaec9caa19
F20101111_AAAXAU mcclister_d_Page_179.tif
3cdad9ab38c3151d263ba21bfc06ca91
42c0bbaa3e654a820c997a4d39ffbd06cb627014
124465 F20101111_AAAYKY mcclister_d_Page_125.jp2
dbc465b5af9e762ea954c93aca794844
1db1e4ff8e957fc1f74350f9777f380383087726
24426 F20101111_AAAZHS mcclister_d_Page_162.QC.jpg
18a773ad393f2b03d0b33eb6cb2cfac7
297ace77177cbd2a5415913efa61325443f3987a
F20101111_AAAWWF mcclister_d_Page_049.tif
ba9b0c89279a3ad9263e7d18492d0adc
2a93d6be30e2a5ac4a608b3943fe874aaa2a33af
95494 F20101111_AAAXAV mcclister_d_Page_048.jpg
e19f383933b8871ed6bb0d2f74019c43
e35a37e60206c00ae2a3fada736c2af573cc9f6c
122636 F20101111_AAAYKZ mcclister_d_Page_126.jp2
25de98139010f143b0c3d923bb5dc4e9
8055f515a874d104c353cb83e4ab6f3cf0f414de
27606 F20101111_AAAZHT mcclister_d_Page_223.QC.jpg
332bdf3acde84a29ae2bb32653bbe256
1159e7a7eb5cb0af8a03ad83ffbd19229691992e
29052 F20101111_AAAWWG mcclister_d_Page_262.QC.jpg
384e1abdba3b43e3ef4b7b56bb1afa24
4d43fc31e77cb317a58d01ad752321f53ed1e0e0
20695 F20101111_AAAXAW mcclister_d_Page_238.QC.jpg
f1222adc61b0b85b5476a4fcacafa525
ca69b04a60ef31e48e73518cf8a98ce967701e7e
29244 F20101111_AAAZHU mcclister_d_Page_017.QC.jpg
9df21e59e60dbdf325da7a9218fab3cc
03da82e276d19b732ce5575c0aad677f435424f4
6906 F20101111_AAAWWH mcclister_d_Page_172thm.jpg
b6a06bd1987ce03d18621e28ed67cf89
2fb6ba58d89f2be0085ff838e7ca090e9f04984f
86577 F20101111_AAAXAX mcclister_d_Page_121.jpg
16ca453be8fe6623e37be1ffcabb1848
a36320a6d0583614fef4eb585abbc8a1db55c972
2419 F20101111_AAAXTA mcclister_d_Page_173.txt
0ac3dbf3c52596feb29512fadf395caf
7bfd0a43ad6f63c46d4c77264e330d7c574c8d86
6827 F20101111_AAAZHV mcclister_d_Page_196thm.jpg
b0bc1a64bc86f75bc35539251648dc16
3b7476663a4fbfa077f11795204514f9151ed859
F20101111_AAAWWI mcclister_d_Page_194.tif
b3f392a37b3027c355eaf1319cff7a38
9951ef120ee88b15aadd2cabf35626ca1a88bccd
2590 F20101111_AAAXAY mcclister_d_Page_166.txt
1055611411763ce7908b9365a313d1d8
dd8496f335388fb32ac70b6540956550507edf93
127418 F20101111_AAAXTB mcclister_d_Page_064.jp2
cff3855cde743c10c4ad7a26a33da7e8
ea9dc58050acbffd202d423e0df737b5f2f0f7ce
28726 F20101111_AAAZHW mcclister_d_Page_072.QC.jpg
3278b422514d6cbe84c12b34ba6bad1a
1ad9decf2ab7a5f1297644f5a21a1cd025319d49
87063 F20101111_AAAWWJ mcclister_d_Page_142.jpg
85bf5bbb5910a6ad26ab9964412c10b1
e4ca22256dd37a0ba3e91dce09e671a406e4265a
1048 F20101111_AAAXAZ mcclister_d_Page_180.txt
6388a03195963efc64b3d8c0f9066170
45cfb9d21974f29a837e36ee74c383cfc551fc46
89920 F20101111_AAAXTC mcclister_d_Page_293.jpg
d9492374cbd0d4745cc32c4878b5e5e5
fad49a97e72b753012a7cc23100b77d5aab737f2
6324 F20101111_AAAZHX mcclister_d_Page_066thm.jpg
e833e92b0de70cc6d1ba0d2ba722d757
e97a8818ed7986423245ef1575f6aa76af590301
F20101111_AAAWWK mcclister_d_Page_115.tif
2a3479670448681991beb9b10fe927b2
0620a3b2b9f702d4a88658f8ca428fea8dd94ea8
3867 F20101111_AAAXTD mcclister_d_Page_003.QC.jpg
9274944ce5021b765a123a1f71c370ca
97242bb3fb4b93b90e4a61422b3ae40b5c44ecc5
28174 F20101111_AAAZHY mcclister_d_Page_022.QC.jpg
ab4418d88926059074f9bc626a817163
5230a58920eaade8e110c0fab656f31485e81c22
52696 F20101111_AAAWWL mcclister_d_Page_275.pro
bf3a1fd2234cb2bf77fb64cce202b1d0
faae6a908d1b9f47409f853db83851a20ab0d216
66595 F20101111_AAAXTE mcclister_d_Page_020.pro
35beba4c7e015794fa4270c7d3dd2dd1
8e54809d46950a897191d7295d74220f7a59f3b0
6544 F20101111_AAAZHZ mcclister_d_Page_234thm.jpg
2fbcdd8a1e29dcd5e3d06bc4d59c63dd
2292ad3c841a30cc752818ba8cd3c0bbda2e535d
61311 F20101111_AAAWWM mcclister_d_Page_037.pro
aa5da597050f2561af951669141b5597
97175e5cb80bfa50f6b20f8cc002820d39bd2c52
F20101111_AAAXTF mcclister_d_Page_293.tif
7f59a42c8a24c1efc7b724618e581816
86f083900a9e8ea9b919c292cfa810ef5bb64ddb
6484 F20101111_AAAWWN mcclister_d_Page_114thm.jpg
be4d0baf89d20b27631c408e722d9fbe
d15611aab54df1c5ce4bb3696d59072a0d4d23f4
F20101111_AAAXTG mcclister_d_Page_074.tif
e1941e0f2d623404ffe732a60b0848af
89e0eeb6bced86ca1c800e4e9678aec2fe2fa673
F20101111_AAAWWO mcclister_d_Page_237.QC.jpg
c793e420da5b8f0edc9218d57fbe4c8d
81661f5d9f71ea89abf3ceea55d79c856e6ed51d
F20101111_AAAXTH mcclister_d_Page_114.tif
788696869e728819b9f38e2233bbba0c
0ad6a5b2d51eeca34a15b0c40d2d56044bdf5982
F20101111_AAAYQA mcclister_d_Page_107.tif
e9731c87fb7265f348c08bb3b7f73a9b
9ca2419c289831b20a39f6b5e765a085c910547a
52465 F20101111_AAAWWP mcclister_d_Page_293.pro
dba2b05f169479814fe2979a1f05448f
b61a5fb0bdf613a53f67a54c4096f4391dbfafc9
107713 F20101111_AAAXTI mcclister_d_Page_012.jpg
d67241d271590828c49f84b1492cc96a
6e745e41597887801eff03e73348db781720bc16
F20101111_AAAYQB mcclister_d_Page_108.tif
7166d2146490b8fd119af4a6a794643f
a436e2c5c2f70dfa989284a33187ad5156a5c574
55200 F20101111_AAAWWQ mcclister_d_Page_148.pro
12bacc81d77ae00911f11f1647bfd179
ea40804ec10ead05310fb9179ed90dbb038cfa1c
142735 F20101111_AAAXTJ mcclister_d_Page_141.jp2
a839941b668fd982f2e085d033558788
112dab008244b33bbd22d95e84b4d10c4afc5d85
F20101111_AAAYQC mcclister_d_Page_111.tif
cdbcbea68a921c0ff842b7c846096cea
88dbd5c815876784d4349f31a20b6de1f0abf527
98157 F20101111_AAAWWR mcclister_d_Page_132.jpg
b349188ca4d35c7eb61851cb049ec4e3
b62b82c2ad8535e5544f069dc1e07119b5ab6e73
57243 F20101111_AAAXTK mcclister_d_Page_217.pro
57d5cdf6a155c8f3f9f3b1dad53093c3
155adc339312446dbd050c3e5f5caf14a7aae507
F20101111_AAAYQD mcclister_d_Page_113.tif
7bb2939bcfe7a40eab28ac63ff9be94c
9ee53037f2fe40a5471946a11464e23cea5c69eb
92157 F20101111_AAAWWS mcclister_d_Page_230.jpg
c4addf77649450f76aacded21127e0c9
2a23c2c2eb07a064db5b75d36f3a033378cd7a51
28291 F20101111_AAAXTL mcclister_d_Page_144.QC.jpg
f9de25dc84e5d638f9252345ee3e3bd1
98d558047ebf8036fae600dc3de905c5e5f562e8
F20101111_AAAYQE mcclister_d_Page_117.tif
c1ddad4d27e32de3026d799bab146b5c
0471766d9538ecc626d08e7d442ae5048ee925b7
81566 F20101111_AAAXGA mcclister_d_Page_251.jpg
32367e9eb2fa1ae90774124181cc1ff5
1619cee2f83170dd9b1c8273c1248b744a4393a1
53864 F20101111_AAAWWT mcclister_d_Page_043.pro
20ea16debdf604fde447601e5abef258
f981748bdd01e72500eb117bba76535f96557d2c
108737 F20101111_AAAXTM mcclister_d_Page_106.jpg
f1768d159e67cfaa3aa8f94599dff663
774ebe40ac4ed163d39f3fd6511902a7bbb9519f
F20101111_AAAYQF mcclister_d_Page_120.tif
b21cb0e6408647a0f1d5178817860ceb
fe5a09c4df96a6a0a65e21d5ce7a2256416f9822
2113 F20101111_AAAXGB mcclister_d_Page_050.txt
b184f619fa2bfa8a54cd2ad40d35ff8d
939cad9336a48e9c49706b32d2b60131193c4233
90543 F20101111_AAAWWU mcclister_d_Page_022.jpg
0e8d5abbeb7f2a0eb7c844151fcf0379
afbeb9bac4b408a7b2a19b80c228a412270aab34
6496 F20101111_AAAXTN mcclister_d_Page_039thm.jpg
ab40176024677efc8425b0596cf3724e
5eb097cea9498548d5ebcca5225b095f72e19bcf
F20101111_AAAYQG mcclister_d_Page_121.tif
fdfb300548db9bf1f0deab5dd9624d28
9f33b4ffcb4dfb38598bd725ae6fca101631440f
F20101111_AAAXGC mcclister_d_Page_085thm.jpg
71889fcba903fb850f93d8d938c44646
c795a867dc21b9083e31dd929c604362ca0f096d
F20101111_AAAZNA mcclister_d_Page_198thm.jpg
a284a73e9d3317fef3e70a573218ae63
53f835e8be3bc62f5c3a167d85438cc45cf420f6
6452 F20101111_AAAWWV mcclister_d_Page_009thm.jpg
84cf80a71bf81a83f83e00e2866548c8
0041808f9ee59c76ddfa5595b860c597467adc66
23019 F20101111_AAAXTO mcclister_d_Page_008.QC.jpg
e6fae8a1aaa9349e6ac6a4f7fc5d7dba
b7aef250c1ad6059f1c33ad2b032697e749bbe93
F20101111_AAAYQH mcclister_d_Page_122.tif
692e6d710fd9ae92ec427667fd937877
649a90700e23422e37ae7748aeee92e28fb1bd1e
29431 F20101111_AAAXGD mcclister_d_Page_102.QC.jpg
95a553f6a7eae0dc5d17e0c63433a537
8d72f67bb9155ebc83cdc32127fe1ca0a0ae62cc
28196 F20101111_AAAZNB mcclister_d_Page_270.QC.jpg
45055100f17bd7f3c39fca5c3a9a82a6
ae405c02b4bb0098a1e3ea32c176864da3feb5da
F20101111_AAAWWW mcclister_d_Page_259.tif
87439a29c601da5dc4266eb621fca0db
808a9957bb3f44d2cc77231370b323aadb1e8166
60929 F20101111_AAAXTP mcclister_d_Page_104.pro
64e3f78039ab0c2e893487ea2af5d7eb
b2e412ace55bc9e220e7edd80078e56488b26f40
F20101111_AAAYQI mcclister_d_Page_125.tif
ec1639704dba0ab6a99f38baf4cfe881
4ac78f030df969f0bdd9b3924273b17a4739b4b5
6508 F20101111_AAAXGE mcclister_d_Page_081thm.jpg
d1fadaf7aab6fc6966b9a5312905c2b1
c0993d7de6f5344a37356117d33f195573b0ccef
7017 F20101111_AAAZNC mcclister_d_Page_048thm.jpg
7957a622db178550bbbd5cb72f6e6596
323a55d0b92b20e77efeec39c9c06ba6e3f96eb3
124045 F20101111_AAAXTQ mcclister_d_Page_264.jp2
c4b6f00381b10a633f74e733c37dc8b6
de976d42bc85cdb78718ae0a1f01f24660d72f7d
F20101111_AAAYQJ mcclister_d_Page_126.tif
2b9b71778142f3200c8d52f080b82f03
53ab4f89091effa65bdeaacba89727d5d4a6414a
6141 F20101111_AAAXGF mcclister_d_Page_188thm.jpg
711e48726bb7a8944d92c4d90e938216
fd8cbe86d8c503bbedf68b64775be350f935176c
28840 F20101111_AAAWWX mcclister_d_Page_277.QC.jpg
b6a09bd9a39e249530a3237bc0a87f07
6986788c73f8f401bac78a51ac2675b3319ba2f1
6979 F20101111_AAAZND mcclister_d_Page_096thm.jpg
3fcfe71000d464b499e757823e44bbfe
fce28141ace07be71de79473b286d2f2a6f7ff95
F20101111_AAAXTR mcclister_d_Page_112.tif
6e591e63d04b767f7f875ed529a23a52
62e2bd2799b65f8ec460937289552f0637fb65cf
F20101111_AAAYQK mcclister_d_Page_129.tif
a341254230a6d39394d73c69b1688b81
4c48a5b4e0c2fb0c8de5b5a54bbb6866c05857e9
F20101111_AAAXGG mcclister_d_Page_163.tif
03f96cbf2262f96ac3d2efd8f1eb7c4e
f8821958714657044adb1b17393c45667354d2fe
96152 F20101111_AAAWWY mcclister_d_Page_178.jpg
337c1d8411fd2d780f42da9e41cd1148
63b840262eb07584c37248b8bfacc415932ae722
29047 F20101111_AAAZNE mcclister_d_Page_198.QC.jpg
7cad0c758f26c7bc3cc3e28bb20ea8c1
2869e3b0b23949523a379c61462934481fa90d77
83280 F20101111_AAAYDA mcclister_d_Page_013.jpg
0a1dae3b877c40cbc98a74c5b35925f2
66381cc81e24ac37cdfdc8ad376b49b831fa2cde
83483 F20101111_AAAXTS mcclister_d_Page_246.jpg
fb57ca8a38bf8be80c9d047f44e42c5a
615cc62dc978843ae0ee1a9c2aa82a07d896bb16
F20101111_AAAYQL mcclister_d_Page_130.tif
752916344bc618235429d7cc8ee33da0
6e7b93fca542b5ad77d4cdb6a31fb5118666f21b
F20101111_AAAXGH mcclister_d_Page_036.tif
a5c58f0c337e518345556e913cc0c4d4
8e7b955a77a3ec45815efab6a5b4ae6c431fc598
102713 F20101111_AAAWWZ mcclister_d_Page_170.jp2
eb888aded9d7808c8334658a38b089d2
07a055c21b52a738c6bbcc1b4d2b4be0b6087921
6518 F20101111_AAAZNF mcclister_d_Page_182thm.jpg
29ccb1a781f038d4a7de94839e1f080b
8c0969d97912a1f828e3ca0a08a962137575c3c3
102609 F20101111_AAAYDB mcclister_d_Page_014.jpg
de610ad330d858ac3a015341c5b8b61e
f97a0604603cadc5c6cdb71034b7728ce260c8ba
28432 F20101111_AAAXTT mcclister_d_Page_060.QC.jpg
c82993f6259d2e3c934d523ae31dfaf2
b31ac5e822b91a59711e2b7cba916a6f740b6a3b
F20101111_AAAYQM mcclister_d_Page_131.tif
eea561951d1a2402e1402ddfe3c86d1a
ef76b0a8338cb0c42d96cfb6657a198eefa86c5e
94312 F20101111_AAAXGI mcclister_d_Page_029.jpg
fe66cc4cf6fab98ba19387d21d8cb5fa
7ce27da0b053b150241774c1c7f8e9af0893d744
6920 F20101111_AAAZNG mcclister_d_Page_141thm.jpg
f9170018bc020af8e8272acdd9bef75f
c85e3e5f43ae0200558f8bb0796c18a15ddb89c6
109630 F20101111_AAAYDC mcclister_d_Page_015.jpg
8d3abc1d9768b3a98291b8fe1819577b
724ece63f7d51b129a8953126b482af37dce9ea5
27663 F20101111_AAAXTU mcclister_d_Page_285.QC.jpg
160120b86f4668fb073e0ca9d90fe9d9
35df8dcccefabbd685474cc0f13154cfaef295d4
F20101111_AAAYQN mcclister_d_Page_132.tif
6587bc2b25b2b213c4f09fdb3c1ae7db
a1bad209783db8d72508890f2c3a17c308b954c9
113269 F20101111_AAAXGJ mcclister_d_Page_212.jp2
57560508bb29dece3d5d6d3060a045c4
11d1ba81cbbd40409c537d58a65344bb4c2eaf40
6788 F20101111_AAAZNH mcclister_d_Page_190thm.jpg
d67059de726dac1ab6656dc67fb5017c
2de0bce064f94f2bff2fbbbadddf87a8fc159362
93365 F20101111_AAAYDD mcclister_d_Page_016.jpg
11a40229cfefa79499ac63778e6d991d
9745a914b550ccd3ae460a104502dc90686a19d6
107422 F20101111_AAAXTV mcclister_d_Page_045.jp2
fb4ae7b4cb94154465506c03547ee86b
71eac923b9678b81380312bbe89a491a80d89688
F20101111_AAAYQO mcclister_d_Page_133.tif
31c26b27a964d633c286ac73987f9b74
6b79ed473fdb78e513e25ad130234acac24ff86d
F20101111_AAAXGK mcclister_d_Page_072.tif
663c7fc2598f923fc73522cf9e7d6c3b
f77637b9cb4139cdb3e609757cafe6a3562e2ca3
F20101111_AAAZNI mcclister_d_Page_280thm.jpg
5ae665a5f6637e39e41f2027d39e9900
770c322c7fdefa699d6c2de815ea6dee41dd406f
91865 F20101111_AAAYDE mcclister_d_Page_017.jpg
0385434cdf67b8408711576809cfdd18
4f33815190d52db1ff7bc27b9027859a9f4488f9
F20101111_AAAXTW mcclister_d_Page_037.tif
08b409ff456feface2755d7f5e00ff6e
a859f0375d8b6ff004c83b5f6ad08962017d9139
F20101111_AAAYQP mcclister_d_Page_135.tif
29b5ac8d0f05de0c375dc27909a1d336
6483397465d2d18c74bf11d5b62bbc8ebbb78246
31885 F20101111_AAAXGL mcclister_d_Page_012.QC.jpg
1a2130f9ccd5607d3919280aaebf8699
5736f6e58e0d6f64ddce5596094e9821ae37d3dd
30366 F20101111_AAAZNJ mcclister_d_Page_111.QC.jpg
ab90e66140e1ef0c5c7b7e561c137a77
6c7b5a6450b1ed6401e4124ba31dfa49581d0886
81265 F20101111_AAAYDF mcclister_d_Page_019.jpg
76d4955a7ae86d12e25678234caa15e3
9c58fc86d0ae77429afddf2c960a9ae574e56463
5307 F20101111_AAAXTX mcclister_d_Page_278thm.jpg
5f051393aa558c06a7093ecdda414583
819b477fe240499c82419e8aa0786c7dead8b347
F20101111_AAAYQQ mcclister_d_Page_136.tif
dbc5abbe695c2a08c84a7c70b77f7561
84ac74443d0862569f85af63cc39ab1c42beb60a
F20101111_AAAXGM mcclister_d_Page_192.tif
007bfa8b2f4d429cf3483ae40a587f5f
ff45b837b0870d9ad4a8195e4f27464d503456de
6643 F20101111_AAAZNK mcclister_d_Page_090thm.jpg
692dc8df0a5f9e45835608b9dc25cb98
cebcdca2f159d37240ce884556b4bb93451384bb
105859 F20101111_AAAYDG mcclister_d_Page_020.jpg
c5475aad98a4c1e380cda7d6e4808b88
b351ce0426429944486b3d740d2999730db865a4
112336 F20101111_AAAXTY mcclister_d_Page_158.jp2
d92f7701eb6c7132da620d8274cfb715
07b0689326bc1110d73e8d27bed9cd956cf5283c
F20101111_AAAYQR mcclister_d_Page_138.tif
09226cda9e7d781302c212604f34f97b
594d6e1915c7a7c58efdc6209e1c65e7cf4a0f7f
6318 F20101111_AAAXGN mcclister_d_Page_239thm.jpg
c7b672ef0c29a9ea492839322b634001
edfa51803c8706d0dbce8c71168809daba0757e0
F20101111_AAAZNL mcclister_d_Page_264.QC.jpg
5d220c0b8e43aa7f4dbaaaa5ee67fd25
89b3f5b1790f6b177145402a74589b0cb2bb39dc
112996 F20101111_AAAYDH mcclister_d_Page_023.jpg
20fc64ba49a30a004c4fcc959d6d82fa
34b54a425184e5a1005863c8341f100c0a46a84f
92385 F20101111_AAAXTZ mcclister_d_Page_086.jpg
f8ea828315145b2b2f14b649d37e4f99
c10f85fe37b4540ace4380c1d8824094eb9fb4dc
21568 F20101111_AAAZAA mcclister_d_Page_296.pro
49ed503e88f253a35bb48f4c18300a92
3b7fc7a0790b225471d00cca025ec05abb17a470
F20101111_AAAYQS mcclister_d_Page_142.tif
e80b34615bd045d49e3569e072045c4f
4eca7cb01e25e9848db40b284e0d8fa9b6b19ee1
5360 F20101111_AAAXGO mcclister_d_Page_002.jp2
137ade14ccfad09d7d740e72cd5b46cf
971bc0b7f5948254553ecdea0a12f33c9e5c01ae
29309 F20101111_AAAZNM mcclister_d_Page_099.QC.jpg
fa3545197718f33f7803f4fa57f74c01
f77f32bb5f76ad1203eab326b7402e705db5067f
96702 F20101111_AAAYDI mcclister_d_Page_025.jpg
4cf79c5f1a6dc6dbb5d8d03eb1f232bf
601875fdf250e3e11ffe1167a36ae8e732b0d53d
87 F20101111_AAAZAB mcclister_d_Page_002.txt
765833be907a7beb0e97ccb385ce5253
1b6f00bc46b72a30a703c766959db1a43f3e2c48
F20101111_AAAYQT mcclister_d_Page_143.tif
794737b2cdd9a0ed131e9ce0c0466f39
aefd9eef3ad934cfa0ad6220c8e7aa62bd640921
3770 F20101111_AAAXGP mcclister_d_Page_004thm.jpg
9576de3f0fb2186279d07cd1a37541e1
a805367203ea0bf54c6975fe9b22fabbbd57aa7e
29981 F20101111_AAAZNN mcclister_d_Page_214.QC.jpg
96a392bb69fd4885fbde6031ab65e143
d2f16f8a9e789b1ae5d1a8ea5532b26cfdb2f555
96259 F20101111_AAAYDJ mcclister_d_Page_026.jpg
7c8691bb36322ec9556a14cda8c3a4d2
bb38dc977d9f9c85c3edf1dd8353acee43a16ec8
1142 F20101111_AAAZAC mcclister_d_Page_004.txt
1b14ba48e79848af128c9405c922a94f
97f01c828f3eaf5356389f907dc555df0a78d451
F20101111_AAAYQU mcclister_d_Page_144.tif
c1d28eab98490865cda58af503598548
b7a18a156f4c7e15be92c87fe99eb8bcc1331618
27325 F20101111_AAAXGQ mcclister_d_Page_117.QC.jpg
71aa8b31e5807b0168d7f9bf0bd3be1e
e3ef00e9ac34a549b902a29cdb0d3ea394250802
6317 F20101111_AAAZNO mcclister_d_Page_205thm.jpg
2fdeab2415531d7943ee38de2cdc2028
718952ef07e955ad6543af7f3b2cb869867ad80f
92923 F20101111_AAAYDK mcclister_d_Page_028.jpg
3e7e15da696a3169e701225b50b0d533
d918fc47e794c4d5d009cc6e34877b6d396ad270
1997 F20101111_AAAZAD mcclister_d_Page_007.txt
bdc795c5bade1cf3a74186bf63bd30ba
54f10e27d96cf1b7485b61a02255463f89941a59
F20101111_AAAYQV mcclister_d_Page_148.tif
cb51f63c572e8027b538c3ab7c3f0dc0
66ca35b4468d3224eff1a01ba84423930114706a
28606 F20101111_AAAXGR mcclister_d_Page_026.QC.jpg
169fb5da73e6b7bd996637f2d1f8a1ad
4163f6aca8ab6682003c387548f6ceb046a33a09
7010 F20101111_AAAZNP mcclister_d_Page_266thm.jpg
cae5c74942c89e40ade919eeaa87652d
1ad9466076310d65903543a64729d9308120ab94
100047 F20101111_AAAYDL mcclister_d_Page_031.jpg
2140ceff4011c63372dd5fb2ab92d6c0
d7820cf31c904276333436946f6ee5a40b3b5c65
1753 F20101111_AAAZAE mcclister_d_Page_008.txt
d0820c2ac2693b41554e58b9f0b78e9c
b96b0fc0cf69db67aadda5be37480fe8b0bff170
F20101111_AAAYQW mcclister_d_Page_149.tif
802dea428311e86c242308bce3c439ae
c4dafce8bc0c6e6b700a9a7740881c55d5253196
7069 F20101111_AAAXGS mcclister_d_Page_105thm.jpg
403b78775a5ee4a668c5fb293c339d74
3b0342fc7c5a9059f8811b96cfd50dd75c40553d
F20101111_AAAZNQ mcclister_d_Page_224thm.jpg
d2554331f7ee94ff46dc65477ef39b6f
a1e0b6c89e38f26289cdb9bb464480c67368dc5a
90026 F20101111_AAAYDM mcclister_d_Page_033.jpg
2b2c648fd704742dc5a058a54f5f9ab0
6a8014517022ee535f4dbaf3ed0f91e8ff58a6a4
2319 F20101111_AAAZAF mcclister_d_Page_011.txt
3355dc97d35a3474c4beefbbb13dea74
64f8768e8d7e87e669a491830c303703db35fa9a
F20101111_AAAYQX mcclister_d_Page_158.tif
b924618b6eb8fecd9c0d02fd09968b1e
6f718bbdb6794c1f6d733c87183b64f429dd0a2a
30589 F20101111_AAAZNR mcclister_d_Page_287.QC.jpg
69e83b55580795301b934ff45542aad2
fdd8ff5d809844bf80323ffd6c64dda810ed9ae7
89060 F20101111_AAAYDN mcclister_d_Page_035.jpg
2c18d7611523bcc166c242dde66bc9aa
d4d9fd68ccc96524f41ec2708354fdd19a5fc3e4
2659 F20101111_AAAZAG mcclister_d_Page_012.txt
8b53dc22909999aa8557bc11fa93216a
01975816e75a8073d2c28712e70dc2bd158993e7
F20101111_AAAYQY mcclister_d_Page_159.tif
062b628f7639aef0df29125a45971639
8928fc6c45a4443287e6128f2e868e615f1c8609
68405 F20101111_AAAXGT mcclister_d_Page_116.jpg
1c3e82f75e1c76812467549239ce39e0
f88fdde5a7b3fb8a3c72858cb4ad4102c2641a8f
6801 F20101111_AAAZNS mcclister_d_Page_113thm.jpg
f75bd75d995fec9e838f6707a6703340
8bde83f79bca8600886f2243f14c6630126bc971
98500 F20101111_AAAYDO mcclister_d_Page_037.jpg
ab65b8909ba5b515109b1b3d6adf4e89
a5124b842e64c16205d1bfe81416077c5cdccd7d
2022 F20101111_AAAZAH mcclister_d_Page_013.txt
5d03581e9fb3afe1366a7ed4634448e2
3e6faf36ca8f9f258c2e5e837ad973463b622dd1
F20101111_AAAYQZ mcclister_d_Page_161.tif
99daf76a0e7b7cf973ddad929351ce40
f05baaeec1e2d7a3f8f4e1a47c539179c9284995
89940 F20101111_AAAXGU mcclister_d_Page_274.jpg
587ff0e18a0fc16818c3c836244eeb0c
d85397a6cd345f759699ce856215a2cc4a3fcef6
30429 F20101111_AAAZNT mcclister_d_Page_108.QC.jpg
989c6c99327b9641844ac881d2af0f5a
272c8aeb7f6b963758392d83e26ce120e1e782c2
2489 F20101111_AAAZAI mcclister_d_Page_014.txt
d2c7dddd035a61ad95912560bef79b4a
0d8bf04d83a2c81a82edb1b437a0d404e7d0dff8
124181 F20101111_AAAXGV mcclister_d_Page_282.jp2
6a33a7a616a8572e333ad894a680c4b9
9aab5c714d85c748a54bf3d9c3f660343d318c56
27886 F20101111_AAAZNU mcclister_d_Page_053.QC.jpg
c9bbde092927fcf7d9f51afb8626ebe1
1caef2d30f0ead8fba2f8e858915c0c81e77c7ad
64001 F20101111_AAAXZA mcclister_d_Page_014.pro
875c930511a1db6cb1bb17aaefe9f69a
5f72e367bc3e610fa7f504f4e8e581e732bea84e
101671 F20101111_AAAYDP mcclister_d_Page_038.jpg
cadf073876416f4df6e1e42d234ea18f
a537c546c252fba96eed0fb8c2351d0fc067e37b
2741 F20101111_AAAZAJ mcclister_d_Page_015.txt
0d0bf1fa3b82c8d129ae10cb5ec06129
af8b7293791b0674f4297fcccadd6ce4ba3cc22a
F20101111_AAAXGW mcclister_d_Page_239.tif
fb9322926efecd603c6d3993e61a14b7
4c730a4966788907a16da4dda547b360bebc1246
28986 F20101111_AAAZNV mcclister_d_Page_129.QC.jpg
f26d5b508e87a7b4f30e2f9cf4497a84
35656d30c0a5be1570b5e6cccff28c6fe6205182
57988 F20101111_AAAXZB mcclister_d_Page_279.pro
140de7436534353b749ac0f64fccf6a2
b7d29fa154e1ebf8f290f528f03487a89d6ce618
87462 F20101111_AAAYDQ mcclister_d_Page_039.jpg
2f56e0cc9df5748b3f092dc9a1747180
af50530509e43757998798de4a324a25ef075aae
2240 F20101111_AAAZAK mcclister_d_Page_016.txt
a92033127fd1ad8ddd43dfb2ebe28ef1
f1a84e49d52f732d2d5605f9e8451aabe6683303
6267 F20101111_AAAXGX mcclister_d_Page_249thm.jpg
17a2093c9d7a5687bc6c25e873491606
0ee1aa4a495342b1710cc6505fa04992ccaade06
F20101111_AAAZNW mcclister_d_Page_283thm.jpg
d423a9d4905fbc41fbcf63877aed1614
5d2f6a7b0cf67955588394f2b01a8ee4581df7b3
6887 F20101111_AAAXZC mcclister_d_Page_082thm.jpg
e00c3eb1709ccdffae1ec4443271ca57
e829ad7dc42597a378e5ac7df0661514bccc2653
106309 F20101111_AAAYDR mcclister_d_Page_040.jpg
a5a770165161f5860e68744ebb6c2080
e3dfcaaee3b656e0fbca8171e4db0a211f459544
880 F20101111_AAAXGY mcclister_d_Page_296.txt
01ead3c7ba22423f4829adb40fc8e8f3
2b5168c86f5bf12621c6b1cee5b84654a875ba8b
5520 F20101111_AAAZNX mcclister_d_Page_005thm.jpg
033ced37cd84b921cb665bb643103acb
2ea4ae5349402311f78f337c3105414689a01343
55535 F20101111_AAAXZD mcclister_d_Page_258.pro
48d1575ea5ce2bdcf1541148f2734452
a6eee38c49566e84b0e3aa7efd0faaf7c3420466
95755 F20101111_AAAYDS mcclister_d_Page_044.jpg
cbb96469e3bdfa1aff5e26cbbaff2b19
dd69dd8aa4a26a0bfbcf261d3a4a38c1df3d6acc
2229 F20101111_AAAZAL mcclister_d_Page_017.txt
1e8546713bc9caa8dd97c4a2abfd82a4
9d18a3004d2742b154c2f4e97c2b6d702f9f1b1c
30976 F20101111_AAAXGZ mcclister_d_Page_105.QC.jpg
c08c543930c5521a42d938da20dd7c0e
a0f11386ae58beb3dee0b3cc6502729ae68805ef
55985 F20101111_AAAXZE mcclister_d_Page_233.pro
6844fcd501edf8fb71c45f54886c57de
f6e92313e54c3b15e25c5a600aac00905283cdd1
93101 F20101111_AAAYDT mcclister_d_Page_049.jpg
d17ca811cf365118d709ab6870c787c0
34d6119eeb159b0fb7a5e771e062c8ca2e479bf1
F20101111_AAAZAM mcclister_d_Page_018.txt
a1cccbebddf0a1e600749612b29f50a9
5caae26e680d9edca259b005d42c65893c3e4344
29847 F20101111_AAAZNY mcclister_d_Page_143.QC.jpg
fb786ab595adb7068e62822cccb11dcc
73b5fb85fc40e3d18df9bd585600e07e0fe3466e
28693 F20101111_AAAXZF mcclister_d_Page_151.QC.jpg
51640891e3ecfd608edf5a3d7960c235
9a71d8f7ab154ef7c5259662e7e7a4b924797dd2
91960 F20101111_AAAYDU mcclister_d_Page_051.jpg
d8098c97193fb4c0c85c8f6aec12dabe
02e21737ecf91bc58abc0544127cf74f4de7a9eb
2006 F20101111_AAAZAN mcclister_d_Page_019.txt
a2ae8b7de93f1d08cfa1ac47a553a5e6
c39fac4aeb8cc8956063cd8d6a0919c8c60b4ed5
26460 F20101111_AAAZNZ mcclister_d_Page_197.QC.jpg
84a92be7c28ef54149af973414c2a39d
a4fc97d25ef2aad386647b1ac0f2f480bdb4bccd
91715 F20101111_AAAYDV mcclister_d_Page_053.jpg
8a95d872967e21262b9007f3ebca5043
c19df8f4d026f0bd66835afd853073a64de38a18
2596 F20101111_AAAZAO mcclister_d_Page_020.txt
58fe4bfcd277170e8d8a46b907c10d6b
9a26496ae3d92b0e481c7f690374a96294a56769
F20101111_AAAXZG mcclister_d_Page_034.tif
7f07bd9019bcbbbac3493761d589d892
35084db17284b1f001127d0877cdfa855c712c24
88069 F20101111_AAAYDW mcclister_d_Page_056.jpg
74b99c983e99c69190afaf2892e35e79
7947af8ac989005260bf0cdad1c3dbe5e16e10f3
55726 F20101111_AAAYWA mcclister_d_Page_102.pro
cd70738a3f0645ef82891ebdf27910f2
4a5a453c1cb10203cea01c97940f1134843d09ac
2732 F20101111_AAAZAP mcclister_d_Page_021.txt
fa51f04baef6daca3c58db6c841edfd6
cea99c852f241b08b08244dc29b403d3e8876621
2306 F20101111_AAAXZH mcclister_d_Page_048.txt
1fbd0d05087612d0e33805484c5ef494
ce2648b0699e27ef15d39eb7ccd470e050987618
87887 F20101111_AAAYDX mcclister_d_Page_057.jpg
952df888484646eef003909e1aaa3736
cf0f0e4e45fd5670bae79443ab6040e3a8eb6d6d
76085 F20101111_AAAYWB mcclister_d_Page_103.pro
bbd6b9526d359ec2b2481eb9db8b4ed8
db31dec627419ee5647a717c5af59df095529c07
2198 F20101111_AAAZAQ mcclister_d_Page_022.txt
866c5315d3580aed363368498f66c672
2f87eb206a9bd2dd77eb7d026a664fff907e84e1
F20101111_AAAXZI mcclister_d_Page_281thm.jpg
009da39c649ca5fd9a9c32abb376dce7
f4748ebef0bd159d6423b626f917ce60309103c8
105738 F20101111_AAAYDY mcclister_d_Page_058.jpg
9bad7a778d3673fe4e5c900310faaa68
217b850ad5408f2ef06e2daff456e63591fd7fee
F20101111_AAAZAR mcclister_d_Page_026.txt
1f36b337ce24882040741bcce4225e4d
1cb61cbcd30606d7c455d97d7e2ee699d9ecedd9
29809 F20101111_AAAXZJ mcclister_d_Page_037.QC.jpg
d661ea77901fb12e87d9dcc62bacf272
346cf8f72d6a3ec86a736504503eb17f3def89c2
91208 F20101111_AAAYDZ mcclister_d_Page_060.jpg
21b0cf6785a25d286f6d9bc8892ad582
e15c1e28e70ab27eec95572b7607a1c44277ceb2
69642 F20101111_AAAYWC mcclister_d_Page_109.pro
e2ed9822ef2cf0c07df64907f04313b7
687f5713371be511b4163792a8f7a24619aa0bf1
2555 F20101111_AAAZAS mcclister_d_Page_027.txt
b584574e93d4692d6c3d9c1f61718acf
afe22a3ba027abb43ea8a840f8d26e32baf35357
F20101111_AAAXZK mcclister_d_Page_272.txt
292a9663dc2df27c8406c110da4982b0
25aa726176d2eca9a1ab2c57f72cdaf5732d2c0a
57384 F20101111_AAAYWD mcclister_d_Page_110.pro
471bc28099573b61be41ac0d4d41cc15
694029aa8289258fd95460bd438d421b5ec8924c
2270 F20101111_AAAZAT mcclister_d_Page_028.txt
eaa701dbcd7b523395b7f137ec5635ec
4a2765d7dca27440cb21b8f0f0cdb3b9d5e82569
27341 F20101111_AAAXZL mcclister_d_Page_284.QC.jpg
f35f044082df9a0cabb8996fdcbf8c9e
90e506a48436abe763036f802a2931092765fbfc
62960 F20101111_AAAYWE mcclister_d_Page_111.pro
db8a39cbd532292d43ed4b1abe2b5c73
4fb33b8d9facb7353f3b2c1ca95d0d9f273eb309
2293 F20101111_AAAZAU mcclister_d_Page_029.txt
d39909e04358c8832c7c57ac807bfd97
9f77679df7bea6cfabb009b86bf195ad97a6dcc7
121541 F20101111_AAAXMA mcclister_d_Page_029.jp2
71b27900c6ad10e0110b33e7052cb788
99eed3bd7c389b3a61ab3624d1cd767b008e2ef4
29561 F20101111_AAAXZM mcclister_d_Page_245.QC.jpg
018f122a3e4aba35fc0d07b2a319dce6
137d7b07fd9b870f8b1b86e880bb8a5107b422b9
66082 F20101111_AAAYWF mcclister_d_Page_112.pro
ecce5b158aff8dd09942956fa6dc1fd9
c48530f49e5638942d4b2877350e06e05b9dbef5
F20101111_AAAZAV mcclister_d_Page_031.txt
0db0599651fc2d62da1e73710ac50d51
e845d2ab4f8b0fc01c170194bb11f183d42b6449
91161 F20101111_AAAXMB mcclister_d_Page_087.jpg
b2357695dcc7e5e72fed6475a60c7480
3e39be80e726d1182d54d835a77c79412d3d633a
70044 F20101111_AAAXZN mcclister_d_Page_141.pro
7a3c7cd309be8e70f6979fe6b78f9da7
8e06ad6b6cef21ab99c38603cd690e45e3db1e43
57587 F20101111_AAAYWG mcclister_d_Page_115.pro
0ee72a5a6614c84f66a2da5abf0f1b87
f9aa427fc01ff8138126bc7a2815f78f9d8f368f
2485 F20101111_AAAZAW mcclister_d_Page_034.txt
0e8a3a7f42d4c935e5c47daae66c317a
ef3f14555eba8298165e8d67d24fe2f1b1b6c4e9
F20101111_AAAXMC mcclister_d_Page_274.tif
da1d0340cff1431b47b4572032af0383
9cfb7ae4fa9d07a9c2193bd127e28651bd145ebc
F20101111_AAAXZO mcclister_d_Page_191.txt
77dfb57cadb9af944f17943978d109cd
3b7fee7842fa4c8a6d69c1c58055b71486b3d5be
40917 F20101111_AAAYWH mcclister_d_Page_116.pro
ba1fb413d6084a2889784a93cfacd84a
bcea99636960abdba49a24a878ef8e5dac3f85b6
2137 F20101111_AAAZAX mcclister_d_Page_035.txt
b19ef75c7555a4f7847771b179ca365c
1fd68115e503a5c2f4b99393a66f9684ee4620b6
27755 F20101111_AAAXMD mcclister_d_Page_239.QC.jpg
741a442e191c0901ce25b54a8eb69acb
c0a8aea404e283faeb62bfe8422ce7bd7999320f
27894 F20101111_AAAXZP mcclister_d_Page_052.QC.jpg
e4867a7fc9e3bde7dad263e32ad6cc38
41a0af4f9d4a31dc5231100d780434d7d724ad4c
52052 F20101111_AAAYWI mcclister_d_Page_117.pro
48aa2fff454e5145969516438ea479f6
7f2f7ac88e642e0b29377fb9c8fcb249fac5d596
F20101111_AAAZAY mcclister_d_Page_037.txt
23459717ca7b0fbd286e43e8180ad0be
f8a3eb222f22ffb9e9866d5fe2f1aa0aa56c19cb
F20101111_AAAXME mcclister_d_Page_086.txt
3a122d7b31be4e789020260062c7aae6
5c00af4a45e012a601ca23f0478065ac62beeb0b
2359 F20101111_AAAXZQ mcclister_d_Page_262.txt
13d795a9bb6f511e2e65da02f2ad62d1
52c3e8723268e108208e3736b8f38b9c02180042
67857 F20101111_AAAYWJ mcclister_d_Page_118.pro
7400596444a9810b159629db0e16481a
2362517dc267cfc86b8865afc23fa286613efb8d
F20101111_AAAZAZ mcclister_d_Page_039.txt
bf398f56e9298eaead89d5905aef3c6f
87b659c2d31b283fbbcc03a2fd6b4c04f20a7543
97016 F20101111_AAAXMF mcclister_d_Page_147.jpg
500ed77770d6d8bc33c7640a7c112946
d800fb2a13587e82dbded2282a79535de02c9956
68652 F20101111_AAAXZR mcclister_d_Page_175.pro
84895915b2c342265ba12290a11a8c06
07704c32bcdf3543445b74a9d19924d0615b37a2
66956 F20101111_AAAYWK mcclister_d_Page_119.pro
d35ab81592a7c2aeae5bce2efb26e161
b0285e430badbb689784d6f02042f5f715d4f7e1
28304 F20101111_AAAXMG mcclister_d_Page_104.QC.jpg
48bdd78e48d29b7dae6a5a25d3e49791
4f4a0b76074026f991c0c936ec9cf0cc26224404
53445 F20101111_AAAXZS mcclister_d_Page_228.pro
7b1785d949204d6d0a17528081c81ac8
5cd39b4d47d1be0da5d832ff4eae620884e1bf10
55995 F20101111_AAAYWL mcclister_d_Page_123.pro
8d58df000e73edfb0b46ebbd68bb0892
67cf251df5f5af8af542c0c2ce1832ceb38137b1
125998 F20101111_AAAXMH mcclister_d_Page_075.jp2
89d7287290531433aec8d9cb1563d65b
098419e63ab8645f3e868ce09ff6ba3d2e1805a1
125035 F20101111_AAAYJA mcclister_d_Page_011.jp2
08fe9af258401b9f8374b542eeb2a611
0d41e2005b6e6c3dad3a27ce098019a9c9bc1678
F20101111_AAAXZT mcclister_d_Page_015.tif
c7c9acc3f3e0b1c2b916fe513783fcc0
677d45cef1dd15f64f0257e658a6bf09a9ba47ba
58542 F20101111_AAAYWM mcclister_d_Page_126.pro
8d5d51673af4071a5973c254463a8366
939de071014608a69ca1f7148c86b20d9f79c871
135685 F20101111_AAAXMI mcclister_d_Page_292.jp2
d927167aa9687e131884ca8c9db607d3
f39ebd2fc09851e4e1228e5137f43ce8a39f1cce
139688 F20101111_AAAYJB mcclister_d_Page_012.jp2
7ae45132b72b85c67cd832dd046e6996
1480b9d5e988391935b1778189c508e1fe17d4a8
6421 F20101111_AAAXZU mcclister_d_Page_075thm.jpg
a10631ce18b210cc4b2078e1137a367a
9f5017896dfca1c34c3b2ddeb8ba66b4848dac3e
61006 F20101111_AAAYWN mcclister_d_Page_128.pro
cf26ad0b043c9791dc9f39613a85d402
7d1bc27038a71a297a070c3c25b8d038ead5747c
F20101111_AAAXMJ mcclister_d_Page_096.txt
70f3dc05902d01113f434bbc4921967b
0268bd9dfe54882686dcb73eb6be242d2fb5b35a
109495 F20101111_AAAYJC mcclister_d_Page_013.jp2
4228d5ce3b4ab2ba5c2ead6999240dcd
0022987a45c104b1c33f6d1696b9be95da25a9c5
F20101111_AAAXZV mcclister_d_Page_090.QC.jpg
95c6ce4ec7146895aaa83e8c41072228
66333f3a9c74e0ae8d61d715caf0d8024fc135f1
61124 F20101111_AAAYWO mcclister_d_Page_132.pro
513efd9640a7755c24fd1a82aa64e207
d64af08885ec73e4277fe9aab7ac00b871928d32
6655 F20101111_AAAXMK mcclister_d_Page_106thm.jpg
0926913976026d56f9dba434e16b0f9c
9a74f956eea2626e1e1afdc5ffbe83c34955ed14
134103 F20101111_AAAYJD mcclister_d_Page_014.jp2
3fc254d71d714dfbc8d631d2a5af6b7c
ac87163a75812fe8c3cdf03c66ea6643c9528f38
128626 F20101111_AAAXZW mcclister_d_Page_173.jp2
4c5b223abc399c52480c357011885aa5
b8f9e752c9ce85efbbc307ddf39154412c19010d
65034 F20101111_AAAYWP mcclister_d_Page_134.pro
32a8a10b8b974e1eeb5490844e55e5a3
d6b9d4224462623cb489c43ebd43c5b7c23d0f1a
28278 F20101111_AAAXML mcclister_d_Page_073.QC.jpg
6071fc9388d5ca048b2d16bd60393aab
75e039a9d5720534c044acc6852c389bddc5681d
141827 F20101111_AAAYJE mcclister_d_Page_015.jp2
d24480ae6b15e33bbcd52d3ee6ab7e1a
912ae9177b2e764e263eaf686becb31b67253717
6166 F20101111_AAAXZX mcclister_d_Page_275thm.jpg
d67a229a21633f159ab371128a01af02
ef037946e5c7a671528eb33fd59b93679f0c0172
54979 F20101111_AAAYWQ mcclister_d_Page_135.pro
2d4a36e044ae28ba3b9583cd671bfd78
4943e91a8ba86b2e9827e7f2a3c18e3c569ccaf0
102318 F20101111_AAAXMM mcclister_d_Page_027.jpg
86453321d9b28326dafc0a9582936e0c
4d1658424fcaf90b54f5ee3099de3c13908cd499
119312 F20101111_AAAYJF mcclister_d_Page_016.jp2
27ac292a720aaa439f7c3fae8b762f17
2e0193a48bed9db698b54f0158656840b184b779
F20101111_AAAXZY mcclister_d_Page_231.tif
0f3701328fa92f3fdf0fa18d1c4decf1
668ea8e1ab09e130842087ada1013c357aebab32
54777 F20101111_AAAYWR mcclister_d_Page_137.pro
1ce4aa7bc28046f06087a168bda811fc
cf72ef30a88f0d0bc9319088f09db5c5fd1373d7
F20101111_AAAXMN mcclister_d_Page_050.tif
a893f311bb55692484d44351c350d4e1
75987527aab391696daf3a247d9e7a665b255259
119266 F20101111_AAAYJG mcclister_d_Page_017.jp2
7dfbedbf2cd6809157f259bea12fa9a1
d931deee8a231433ae9166b5f808e23ea1ffe162
F20101111_AAAZGA mcclister_d_Page_280.txt
4dbcdc5b13339f6156c1e32477c08428
294c91df9a8ca667d81601bc5a7549741cf7488f
54980 F20101111_AAAYWS mcclister_d_Page_138.pro
0720bc5c71a1ce38e82341af21948a30
f00d74610ee964b17eeeff5f9ca75dc47e1e3807
55656 F20101111_AAAXMO mcclister_d_Page_236.pro
f5627e2d34d72e696fffb97252872a9f
b227e5f06fed2d91da510d98bf57c83129ee695b
108067 F20101111_AAAYJH mcclister_d_Page_019.jp2
3a5de303d8bf69a131262fca1d53099e
55a9343b49bca3a44777fbe7bd90a08617a0a6b7
F20101111_AAAXZZ mcclister_d_Page_202.txt
f96a1b4bd4a12b9ba2307c5ce5ddc2e9
214c80939308d9d2ab64abe5567ac8b5011e0639
2522 F20101111_AAAZGB mcclister_d_Page_283.txt
89debe845dd90d75efc847aa737ac43e
cf76a0d50818d12ae660e137e9a1a890d910d460
60140 F20101111_AAAYWT mcclister_d_Page_139.pro
e95d4a24bca39178915cf8602e943406
3afd958bf02b03f3e6d95b5c9c1270529dfa4228
F20101111_AAAXMP mcclister_d_Page_105.tif
db4d0de2127ea2b2e071f9712f64d938
6e6302a6f54323bd6ab3c225e718fd7be610a448
118256 F20101111_AAAYJI mcclister_d_Page_024.jp2
6b6b6d6ffa0f70370b6ff93a03b91e39
04b8699086083ce7765ac2222befa59b1442c32b
2179 F20101111_AAAZGC mcclister_d_Page_284.txt
eddc4eb0c344246c0e107920d2951a2b
c65abd8f3cf9cb9dbfb0ee5e21797ff1d3be00ec
59440 F20101111_AAAYWU mcclister_d_Page_140.pro
888d77b0624faf142b4da2aa2bd06433
ac3b8f450404b1c3a02f7a7e4d9326f9daedf44c
6618 F20101111_AAAXMQ mcclister_d_Page_067thm.jpg
3dd190bced1a4bc44d19505a75228490
b7e8f7adbdb1fe5245aa5ce6412fe149b6ea1078
125118 F20101111_AAAYJJ mcclister_d_Page_026.jp2
c23f1be55af377bf9f03e376593cd1c5
8f367e5e919926ef5a1121009dae6a744f8b7538
2341 F20101111_AAAZGD mcclister_d_Page_285.txt
5b474bcd31adbcfc386a37eb41b9177a
31ee0fff1b3102a475a66df4953b7fd2dce1b0cf
53757 F20101111_AAAYWV mcclister_d_Page_142.pro
b4b17a00aeee0a7de4cd1f9504e9fffb
f867a502bb0ffd74cf62b25f4c7ce92aff546f17
F20101111_AAAXMR mcclister_d_Page_134.tif
e35e2077d8c4de74a76541f13cadba1f
e8cd7eb7c05bebb6f83fba0433e21ee2657be9f0
126386 F20101111_AAAYJK mcclister_d_Page_030.jp2
8aba632e46293b1c173f0ea76c214161
a96f590aa01c081c2cc35342431f90b135a8cd0c
2691 F20101111_AAAZGE mcclister_d_Page_287.txt
75264ef51d816c85467655e179a2a418
dbe934ba621a754d4b05101347c1ace24fb78c8f
55222 F20101111_AAAYWW mcclister_d_Page_144.pro
ea764bf0f9bc5d4742984c3833641a47
9129a3790445f6a5f3b6645181f28399051ec519
2242 F20101111_AAAXMS mcclister_d_Page_208.txt
dd8fca5f1939ebb65f87d6eed2644f3d
9be4a0657d5089c2f58c794d2783e39be1e9cd3d
146639 F20101111_AAAYJL mcclister_d_Page_032.jp2
807dd607bafc74dbdd1df5c580b7962d
b5ab899bb46b0a0458094a272f944044371444df
2669 F20101111_AAAZGF mcclister_d_Page_289.txt
94a959702dd77ae456d6c2d7b210f071
354d02cf4b9a4cfb34f2ce3722731437ce3ab224
55955 F20101111_AAAYWX mcclister_d_Page_145.pro
0b2707f20ae1270689125001f229079b
255a3d565cb926e82f16c8ac52a7a14af44755bd
26609 F20101111_AAAXMT mcclister_d_Page_110.QC.jpg
9b2206e18824d41a782ebbd0df136685
3ee92d906d3b29137bdbba1002ebaa0aecb480d7
131948 F20101111_AAAYJM mcclister_d_Page_034.jp2
968b71e419795fb9df135ba17acea669
7e99b2433742854a75deef0353a85101f8f3734f
2107 F20101111_AAAZGG mcclister_d_Page_293.txt
c0c851aaff7249398f83e29d1b637e51
811121801a420d9c05939cb6111b5dd93300c087
29036 F20101111_AAAYWY mcclister_d_Page_146.pro
596ffd93f11051898d224e34e05b726c
15d4a4a358ce798a93a7f5c823801246e0449efc
54231 F20101111_AAAXMU mcclister_d_Page_074.pro
73e150862e46b1f42cb728dc75432484
3c5c4630eaa443a4845b3f555e151531e6aaab8a
115980 F20101111_AAAYJN mcclister_d_Page_035.jp2
95dbd845e47c5fcc97e6e07e76937c4f
676e3fc4a625dcd6ee60c2770511b2f65a23934b
F20101111_AAAZGH mcclister_d_Page_294.txt
b703884609e7c89088eef9a8378897f3
b31e79e25c8a29550c8b2cade479101130e76963
59205 F20101111_AAAYWZ mcclister_d_Page_147.pro
f3eab34db8f4b713643f3f0c9a7cd326
138ca5ba3cb5bb9742303698864432a349fd739f
87559 F20101111_AAAXMV mcclister_d_Page_122.jpg
738af5ba8f28a26af73452ec1b36e2ee
1ebd9282147a7141478bb8c63450559b6ead33b2
131297 F20101111_AAAYJO mcclister_d_Page_038.jp2
c0d3fe8f2c18c029725b74a67af1e2e8
e20ac772735f256f3c290ec1c690db0de93e72f9
29669 F20101111_AAAZGI mcclister_d_Page_030.QC.jpg
4951b4bc15231ffed52fdecd54fba222
6294caad5ea08d37330e5212c4bd1700ba6c22fa
6932 F20101111_AAAXMW mcclister_d_Page_040thm.jpg
07c622912283fd262ae9309f87b2ef08
9cf6dbb8abecc9bf86fbbf34a72b75ba3bf85f79
113434 F20101111_AAAYJP mcclister_d_Page_039.jp2
f54231a6c6719b22e09c17fd2ff6c11e
9257190172a92da819286fb079b227791631c612
28269 F20101111_AAAZGJ mcclister_d_Page_261.QC.jpg
1e74aa03fc70bdd95367a8e91ffd1eec
47e5aedb087c072e914301fa4bb0330caa8de75c
28163 F20101111_AAAXMX mcclister_d_Page_290.QC.jpg
74f13740a8025e4ad8519e0cb34192ae
8d32189f8a80447904a2d5fde157c21b01dff9d6
123831 F20101111_AAAYJQ mcclister_d_Page_048.jp2
d952b107a2aca88de00069e68ae9b443
9070c9d25bf550751042cfc00bcfc97eade1041b
28062 F20101111_AAAZGK mcclister_d_Page_281.QC.jpg
8a1eec8a8f4edd70380c34d44f20f2db
07ff0b4f8636e77975be72363d6df09542f79302
91898 F20101111_AAAXMY mcclister_d_Page_072.jpg
7b2fdb6cc26a37f86368dbd4f66678bc
25622f953be083991240b9a50242a9e0a68c4f7f
121219 F20101111_AAAYJR mcclister_d_Page_049.jp2
34e13f81fabb0faeee86d6d60862c185
c36885fdbd7846406f431596a20c84f3b5d2d2ed
30077 F20101111_AAAZGL mcclister_d_Page_109.QC.jpg
56e7300f4ca46ff1feff8d5683848e70
bc3a6b65b7a4dbe468ab58556fddfcfb02ea3706
F20101111_AAAYJS mcclister_d_Page_050.jp2
cabe784740b93bf4ecbf62a8cdd79f9a
842c16817314b236e5af4bfc90b400cf2bb185a9
28523 F20101111_AAAZGM mcclister_d_Page_148.QC.jpg
f99da7bbce3355be1d22cc434d524de0
9bf764fdf6a5290e0d198aea6eaa7d33e359aa6a
78824 F20101111_AAAXMZ mcclister_d_Page_010.pro
b0804906827709b7ffd4445e2b940b7e
778b0d005805c6e85801c3a7a4458fca0fe9ed15
116566 F20101111_AAAYJT mcclister_d_Page_052.jp2
13e3ab24488566375a0d32763afd0d7e
7332c09d7cab4649e1ff3d7a92fcecf58553737e
28492 F20101111_AAAZGN mcclister_d_Page_220.QC.jpg
f3e639c87b87d01d1c578c62472ad1f4
44a883462025bd2ac3ff85a95da4d35cd246667f
27506 F20101111_AAAWVA mcclister_d_Page_138.QC.jpg
aa0f2f14f331112e04a07fc2b5781ae8
aff4865b46c26b1582ad31b149139be5367dc783
128063 F20101111_AAAYJU mcclister_d_Page_054.jp2
d05ec9dbc8a138de6eb74b44dd5509d3
9eea264b3fe030a22c42da19f262c1183872fd7a
26841 F20101111_AAAZGO mcclister_d_Page_133.QC.jpg
e63eb6ba59dacc1c769ce68beef934e4
cbfa924dd64a8943705d347b1d94855742c96482
86707 F20101111_AAAWVB mcclister_d_Page_229.jpg
38d110b959b35e19a567a4a72df71464
39eeae5c68eee16083fe45d7d79b20d9b51bb4e6
30035 F20101111_AAAZGP mcclister_d_Page_079.QC.jpg
8e3f7f20db9dcaa83b77a1d0978067f2
97278f83aff61dd684dc56b02743c5d5bef4990b
104058 F20101111_AAAWVC mcclister_d_Page_291.jpg
fef523a986b504fd6faa24c18f253e25
313b3a9acc3c351590a9f0afc5076b1bbd7c86ca
115201 F20101111_AAAYJV mcclister_d_Page_056.jp2
1f04ee85cac97893969d5e3809b87f6a
0c053e391ccb4a5d8554e5a14c54baae4a96075d
27541 F20101111_AAAZGQ mcclister_d_Page_121.QC.jpg
2550de09f96256c48687b37b4eddb05e
2350ba4d8e75a3d3884087aad46db7d4c1bdfc6d
119311 F20101111_AAAYJW mcclister_d_Page_060.jp2
ee5dda5615d54d3f9529855310611e12
bead07bb5b3a1277f27695313be1233e50d82cd6
132237 F20101111_AAAWVD mcclister_d_Page_263.jp2
f4a31e045e05f61c2b523df306aab73c
6a03e51754ff51cba6dd84c16310e247a94a10f7
113352 F20101111_AAAYJX mcclister_d_Page_063.jp2
ee7d933055b5aec4565d420903838ebb
fca2e502b6d4c60147ace2bd2155b84c0ae6a3df
6492 F20101111_AAAZGR mcclister_d_Page_053thm.jpg
54dfb87954f21d0ae00a99814bdf2e4f
92a58f6d864afd6980645d4c8f18f7de0037ce16
2139 F20101111_AAAWVE mcclister_d_Page_121.txt
6f001ca86ba3f0b7f3c4a619d7f40b2c
634ef3e746578e9eddf0aae2eddeff2fa8ed9754
125719 F20101111_AAAYJY mcclister_d_Page_065.jp2
e4be30a5d2dcbdf521cbbaffa23abc14
3692838bf82c6f091d76b3481b2744b148279f80
30424 F20101111_AAAZGS mcclister_d_Page_191.QC.jpg
59c6a494445c8b1b387fdf2afb28d52b
a92ab2938bccf7a2bc15a43be3cc1572fd477203
109569 F20101111_AAAWVF mcclister_d_Page_066.jp2
8c8d958576cea87f5434e31bcc840dd4
4e46983d6831634bb7466cd466be56d4219b6d76
117253 F20101111_AAAYJZ mcclister_d_Page_067.jp2
ca7aeee38e6e306a31c939b9165447d0
468ee339815ab25560101afc3674bea258e1d95c
7181 F20101111_AAAZGT mcclister_d_Page_027thm.jpg
c90d5eea33309067a4265c5125867c15
2143ce37bf293ada73b8261cb27c987574625e14
F20101111_AAAWVG mcclister_d_Page_196.txt
389bdc5cd5316f2a211eb6dfbc0a0fc7
b4a73bf0cb7154e96cdb450109263e8127036171
6254 F20101111_AAAZGU mcclister_d_Page_036thm.jpg
a69863a1c3fea13f910661b7a366dbd1
9efb94600e582de1c2d60e8cbf16a213e8b0ea16
28962 F20101111_AAAWVH mcclister_d_Page_085.QC.jpg
54de5c37072a0fce3bb596406cc69856
4d91529cf6f37712397cd3b2cbc4ae4aba585827
2134 F20101111_AAAXSA mcclister_d_Page_231.txt
93472095d1567d8c1e396d0e066f080b
7f3d4c555b6a116e799e13706b683cd35c895520
28194 F20101111_AAAZGV mcclister_d_Page_236.QC.jpg
10a8420911fbc2c24c80bc45095a9af2
cf6d809b8f1867a77c39b5ce9b703314e1d59483
98453 F20101111_AAAWVI mcclister_d_Page_059.jpg
849cb3c5fc05ab8fa5843da20993195a
3d3aefa4c65863eccd8a4dd31241f15d73a3d6b4
54891 F20101111_AAAXSB mcclister_d_Page_268.pro
2ae0010cad7f78e721a7c5d6ef5837f1
b60e96f6fd0f9950e0eba1a7ceb6a847c1bfe98e
30658 F20101111_AAAZGW mcclister_d_Page_167.QC.jpg
eebbbe1de9fcf46f66659ed237391aac
8234cdefce1ec7c5a10eb335a2bd404c1d528273
2211 F20101111_AAAWVJ mcclister_d_Page_269.txt
752011b18b54b36b82c169a05df898a7
cda4816bedbda203504cb6701e3ac0abdb509d9f
F20101111_AAAXSC mcclister_d_Page_114.txt
9d1aaf76e578a8d6b1ac5e472bfc12d1
37cc3bf349b37d69564aea65f41b30798d59422a
25776 F20101111_AAAZGX mcclister_d_Page_215.QC.jpg
5ffd6a62eff1878a9ebd498caace1a8c
644f86a59fb8f1fe4c43e3288e130785f0af2bd9
118872 F20101111_AAAWVK mcclister_d_Page_145.jp2
418940578ee5d60f3206779e59857bdb
24b91c2499db3db3a061fc8f5155cab5f213cfde
93088 F20101111_AAAXSD mcclister_d_Page_216.jpg
6ac3e599f0ac42a03f0318290769a061
d9194d22de210add0e9c4f9d55efb54d4bd2be71
27223 F20101111_AAAZGY mcclister_d_Page_039.QC.jpg
d69354c24d9901580c5edb6cb9f59510
8dde9c8cbbb62c12b0e3f65e6a97f06276f98245
6699 F20101111_AAAWVL mcclister_d_Page_150thm.jpg
281d68d334ec03e6a6e2b0ab12d84d05
afd356b05fd51481d68ad644fef2bafb5878e1c5
F20101111_AAAXSE mcclister_d_Page_266.tif
da83d75af3e9440a9ba3b5c0cbe803da
bdf50c845e28262397e7b8a225c1a08db3f4747c
27650 F20101111_AAAZGZ mcclister_d_Page_123.QC.jpg
61225977fcdddabddfecab81c4e7e312
23ef9a38c84024ab64321e88c693fa35b6851f24
53093 F20101111_AAAWVM mcclister_d_Page_244.pro
16ff7e70c2796f882ac6e988b009840f
f33dadaacfa56eea20049bccbdcdb2fe311a64ed
9005 F20101111_AAAXSF mcclister_d_Page_006.QC.jpg
5bf4b8229d1d1ffe7e40eaee3530a0cd
37565baba12b7cb151e8d680f32e9e9b442773b3
F20101111_AAAWVN mcclister_d_Page_001.tif
b59005ee434e5d1942448300de6cb398
3736ffc7875064164db1142b5ac4d445de57c247
104209 F20101111_AAAXSG mcclister_d_Page_252.jpg
829e4c05896960a35afc17e398af4c43
7e94a4d5e32a4dd0c0dbda711722c01b4e508cd7
F20101111_AAAWVO mcclister_d_Page_056.tif
6c2a5d150af26666152c2885d2dc0fc6
4eb8ed77b335af17282c30f4e867f9d787573d68
29139 F20101111_AAAXSH mcclister_d_Page_194.QC.jpg
5b71c98dea645f9b6175ecec0f7e5203
7ff911aaa3248570aebf98ccb163dbce32123291
F20101111_AAAYPA mcclister_d_Page_053.tif
d3887712a57b5856fcefa304d95c7567
6a8a2f5b450f60a22488be2045e9756de26ded7b
F20101111_AAAWVP mcclister_d_Page_271thm.jpg
3400931515ae5da1eba738dd1cae92d0
230879b4c1d2fa60b971734c8dfcf119396221c0
6733 F20101111_AAAXSI mcclister_d_Page_194thm.jpg
36a0be7b791c01d1fd1b34f43764286d
eaac8b39e3c14eeb36f6e4409f456a0bc8ffd6d5
F20101111_AAAYPB mcclister_d_Page_054.tif
e12779e4973ce85a5b71419505b8967a
2fc785ffc1771f8c0ce269cb8ac47d53f295af2b
72551 F20101111_AAAWVQ mcclister_d_Page_055.pro
bfa5ffa43014a02d2842135f4fd661d2
a1f075c44b6c95a328c9a6db3ae894a9ad4ef1d7
F20101111_AAAXSJ mcclister_d_Page_126.txt
0dbf52a5e9eee99d30613215cbfc34b2
60c6789348a7e4fa388bbe667029e688d8c526cb
F20101111_AAAYPC mcclister_d_Page_057.tif
2c1e6bd0c78e310071e660b098d3ea50
a19a6cfcff53f96d509f74d52196479c6866f833
2759 F20101111_AAAWVR mcclister_d_Page_163.txt
0710abc8456567ff00adb0f94bc6b233
01880dd7afd13d97d1c8ed4066c3aec65745f705
2204 F20101111_AAAXSK mcclister_d_Page_172.txt
c2dc565d73822ae13e69eb9027c627f8
919f1f68c81b6890d6634d92cd5eee20e2c6e23e
F20101111_AAAYPD mcclister_d_Page_058.tif
44e02a3b3f3e818244931158f8e51dd3
49f0a3e29f2dad2b880c4705c3793da58c8a2436
90661 F20101111_AAAWVS mcclister_d_Page_148.jpg
143c3baaed86e75dc179f4d71d3568f1
b8e729c7d3c5579c4603b9d9f59001e5f6d80e87
92138 F20101111_AAAXSL mcclister_d_Page_046.jp2
84d5040107eace3e042e747d22240c23
154f0c5739290623bd5e5cb8583eadf2201efadf
F20101111_AAAYPE mcclister_d_Page_059.tif
3aa4c61f66e0e7ef435ecb624ccd2bac
c27b3addef297bcb31aca3315ece49833aa618ec
F20101111_AAAXFA mcclister_d_Page_085.tif
77ab035f48615b019020ce957385d0ce
e585c66ee1e699734cdafb603743cdf4b836b4b6
125599 F20101111_AAAWVT mcclister_d_Page_154.jp2
981f2deb29dd29475a5d9ea43a42b9bf
176d1b0e66a4f50289abd6ffcaa59e0503a27ab1
F20101111_AAAXSM mcclister_d_Page_295.tif
dbf1a534a6ef8c4c1835fcb284c02bc9
c7944ca1daa6b2e140eac67569c39422802dd6ac
F20101111_AAAYPF mcclister_d_Page_061.tif
76bfc4c2d8a6e082728df7930409b18f
76b749676ed4d2d9a688279ac8e2a959dc80df36
123277 F20101111_AAAXFB mcclister_d_Page_178.jp2
cbae225b1818844a77eb60bfbb1e9ba6
40c9312a441f0722b6e4ed61f8d9a69b3b178c40
123898 F20101111_AAAWVU mcclister_d_Page_235.jp2
3b00118a97c6a1c8b90b03ea6a3f7ac5
9f1a78e2db5fb5ba7e92a13103162ac3a402db78
28013 F20101111_AAAXSN mcclister_d_Page_097.QC.jpg
517556f10acc767b4fb664b6c0468085
27112733a102a926616161107437fb4929cb42f9
F20101111_AAAYPG mcclister_d_Page_063.tif
3c30c90f88238ed559ab30700a7cf853
f663f422f2d7fbea8c77cdd5a593f083a2ddf3da
F20101111_AAAXFC mcclister_d_Page_064.tif
fdc3b1824930481d74f8141fd7d054db
2f99d65aed97e6a5d247852cdac90c9af4ecf436
30983 F20101111_AAAZMA mcclister_d_Page_134.QC.jpg
8e7c1e9efa54295941cb448f59d30108
8f2bf3bf75e864353e89b0f18ec6a4a5bbc13c18
F20101111_AAAWVV mcclister_d_Page_071thm.jpg
0f02c5b393aa25f79cd1231f8878d53e
f742fb2c65ffdc5697a15d822c5be7c294147aa9
F20101111_AAAXSO mcclister_d_Page_030.txt
3d01a713e9e4324bd087ced88050cab0
6b94b9d95bf6f4ec92de0b24331783bacfab19c1
F20101111_AAAYPH mcclister_d_Page_066.tif
640fee467d26bc2f88011dada036f0cc
aab5f0563b7ee1479137c473501537d84a1aeeb3
F20101111_AAAXFD mcclister_d_Page_223thm.jpg
e442bb7802a6638966006268b2c136cd
9072b8dc9b363d8ffd564fe1b6d257f5d156601a
26449 F20101111_AAAZMB mcclister_d_Page_205.QC.jpg
0efe3cccd4220d38d4a21cec8b95ca02
49bbc3c900adf59ba08871d3eb9d5b1cc28e4589
F20101111_AAAWVW mcclister_d_Page_035.tif
83d588c897d05279cc1669d7e4ac5dfa
3d7335d6e0ca013ec8e5bd0d16a76dc5fcd3492a
F20101111_AAAXSP mcclister_d_Page_221.tif
d4b0d3837704278681c80e51688880dd
ddabcfbd3903d8671c4d59a008e5a35f4fb83e56
F20101111_AAAYPI mcclister_d_Page_068.tif
788ac85875c40f6a565c1e390733b811
0c335b17778b6c8d65e0a9f2b4e4f82a2384e081
29386 F20101111_AAAXFE mcclister_d_Page_242.QC.jpg
41b86c54350aace3f8522ba2866a46c6
922e24159e9e7999608b2a176ce1855b2d1a4d37
6706 F20101111_AAAZMC mcclister_d_Page_074thm.jpg
8eb391a733bb2e2dd03deb472c3ac228
7817ab428187a17dd37337386e71055660789f98
118067 F20101111_AAAWVX mcclister_d_Page_174.jp2
1e9882122af51ba67bcf2203257cd6d2
015cad9a07f4668663966034cf118b2a464d6f41
30482 F20101111_AAAXSQ mcclister_d_Page_252.QC.jpg
c3adc294bd5bc3418d3375d4cd7ac2c4
99a13967ca870d80437960ad238d835d416bc5b6
F20101111_AAAYPJ mcclister_d_Page_069.tif
8c925409cb52a8d7d63c6ac7195935ce
89457ed7305f5d77962832b8c3fcf7b8da14c8ea
58097 F20101111_AAAXFF mcclister_d_Page_049.pro
889531594332f0f9a5b58d41685ab68a
164b0fc228c67869b533f5781bbbdf09b2214cef
6398 F20101111_AAAZMD mcclister_d_Page_121thm.jpg
c5fea649e8ce91f8489b54305bb73cb7
a10209a885c8e2672d05f200a344f088df6b49f7
149511 F20101111_AAAWVY mcclister_d_Page_098.jp2
a5da8097a87b7b1c21f87689529934e2
ab72bcd6060f6c3d7eb2901cb5375ccb423b717f
56363 F20101111_AAAXSR mcclister_d_Page_261.pro
7c09de723396806e599a04587b7018f3
a03e3466edbb77f889d2cb352aa68ba0303385be
F20101111_AAAYPK mcclister_d_Page_070.tif
50a791fa5c8a73aad920b62b5c1861ba
970b65fea2651de784fa8485155defad3f020552
6985 F20101111_AAAXFG mcclister_d_Page_059thm.jpg
18816aacaf2ed8e85127f846fc94f694
7f20a1e1766a965dba843ff3d3779a7b1987a845
6995 F20101111_AAAZME mcclister_d_Page_287thm.jpg
8d416f322e2e8222d547e68ce9971242
449a9c934c603067851a7783886952285b1716f8
F20101111_AAAWVZ mcclister_d_Page_264.tif
c476ded721d97f43ea720445e7f19619
6c366bf87faffe6cea52bf1557bdfd11809f1cae
F20101111_AAAYCA mcclister_d_Page_004.tif
8330825f5e8f0cd12a2f94ee0510eb21
2c641ca562abcbc24b592a9c57329b9074fe4d40
30477 F20101111_AAAXSS mcclister_d_Page_107.QC.jpg
78d8b3a9ec1cd8cca305e1398e4bf05f
2bff28f9af972e68789b825128deda2037fa1ba6
F20101111_AAAYPL mcclister_d_Page_071.tif
43b4b62eaa245661cd0e100aa7ce4d59
9f7a7f9f6c402138bf49823bd9bc79d7ca61a7a9
F20101111_AAAXFH mcclister_d_Page_211.tif
2edfdddee3e6c1029c637e7d5541b6c8
a0848f590883438393df319db94aed58aca3a9bd
27256 F20101111_AAAZMF mcclister_d_Page_229.QC.jpg
7b11526a1e87eee1a881e8c97df622b5
70bf41b01be0fd6e23d3d415d2b5d9fdf8a71402
28664 F20101111_AAAYCB mcclister_d_Page_207.QC.jpg
1a1d40dca8170073bb5cec27f70a4d95
a97faee8219004a7123368a5d416424a40d037ba
121152 F20101111_AAAXST mcclister_d_Page_206.jp2
eabf670e7e19e716e25986f82c8267f5
fb0addeee9560395fcb3560e56b2bd4df14ce8d4
F20101111_AAAYPM mcclister_d_Page_073.tif
e48fd64715e8f0bae4d17200b3f44449
aca6b85c1c4e546a53dfd615b2cfcd6912ee9c5b
F20101111_AAAXFI mcclister_d_Page_201.QC.jpg
688e18d53afd85dd19fb486041f9a154
93dd617234fb60be6c38117bf52d59020210cff9
6778 F20101111_AAAZMG mcclister_d_Page_217thm.jpg
0541660050ad6926594b6e282598e5d5
8835817b5f9dc8e3e7cef483ea0fc5e5407d4eb1
F20101111_AAAYCC mcclister_d_Page_139.tif
2ec8e0251083dccf6880fb64af8aa3c7
9c7b77a5bcb058e3937d90ca89f7411c3730c5a6
28430 F20101111_AAAXSU mcclister_d_Page_259.QC.jpg
d85a4d5d18417baff88cde529c4b0b46
b221575ec97fa81ac03b155f5afd1c7a407feae0
F20101111_AAAYPN mcclister_d_Page_075.tif
1239e687b15ce789a6c634a62dc27532
cec2163da8655574d9a0856389d471d4a99c1b7d
F20101111_AAAXFJ mcclister_d_Page_093thm.jpg
67e9181779f2cb829684225464d24646
a7507b000529abee5f7748526761959e68c3e175
27626 F20101111_AAAZMH mcclister_d_Page_174.QC.jpg
5f97d5b40b84e5b6809f8df5c7936190
eb564bc71e9bd55b5bc4146868d09503bb8c1005
6523 F20101111_AAAYCD mcclister_d_Page_212thm.jpg
cc8c823b03d3789d63cbc7efab8d440e
42a51b5511fbf748222e5b04b616f55ff411c26d
117742 F20101111_AAAXSV mcclister_d_Page_073.jp2
609542164eb7d015898718b7a1d836ac
453826ecea622c3c0b8387c9c63743eb1fa86095
F20101111_AAAYPO mcclister_d_Page_076.tif
0b80c3c0c1b8431ef5dd98f5647ad582
76fef7db91b8906ef872267520794fd1ea98c435
27767 F20101111_AAAXFK mcclister_d_Page_225.QC.jpg
78217be034491ddbddd4e33f502ca69a
01bbdeeaf4ec2465b317a6dc7aebe5b0d2dd1c67
29335 F20101111_AAAZMI mcclister_d_Page_127.QC.jpg
249d88b5f46f51a19f50bc059992864f
9801de2ebd3fe90fedd2f6e7704acbb7f7190854
28369 F20101111_AAAYCE mcclister_d_Page_288.QC.jpg
a863e97478feaae504a3a26913175f50
ae160cac9877eddca31e7860fae254b4f7391830
111548 F20101111_AAAXSW mcclister_d_Page_224.jp2
8ea69eccb5ec9ac84b8dca788c790a10
13dcfef7e62323bbfe25472160c90554a35c52dd
F20101111_AAAYPP mcclister_d_Page_077.tif
956417922fa028fdce23186ef09af4ef
58f2b50103c52428b9b6fd31a741439d11c8ccbf
F20101111_AAAXFL mcclister_d_Page_145thm.jpg
57a194ac9c563d7cb8e5ccdac28ec4f1
b179c74a50ef9239b8b463298dac0b358faffd53
26952 F20101111_AAAZMJ mcclister_d_Page_249.QC.jpg
909227f1356f29b8f1016045f985e4df
0dd316f92228e4b44948ca3df9faee1211bdc0c9
F20101111_AAAYCF mcclister_d_Page_254.QC.jpg
83ddf3fbf41c51f43c772fccde203526
9ddc8df9cb7599e0f80ba54c1cc744222a587d76
2651 F20101111_AAAXSX mcclister_d_Page_291.txt
d7d38f485b3538ff6d3cf65b84c3c3c1
3d035edb859a8aa7cb642f27bc439d3da7467929
F20101111_AAAYPQ mcclister_d_Page_081.tif
6408b818782c496b132bf1809e04b1eb
e1faabab27f1e8e5ae6ccca69038937946ddc16e
50745 F20101111_AAAXFM mcclister_d_Page_146.jpg
a95145b23357129ce56a4111a7b88004
0f574fa85cfc7deee19b10c23a1d320b2ad7fb1a
31310 F20101111_AAAZMK mcclister_d_Page_020.QC.jpg
176cb6fa33d100099555b62ea910f146
87867cd279a508c35409effdb5c27e0f9092d541
59634 F20101111_AAAYCG mcclister_d_Page_294.pro
a18b7d985f2a1eee98ea1cdc81bb2c49
bc32f136f26a817d1411470867814ea9b3f9bd8c
96459 F20101111_AAAXSY mcclister_d_Page_030.jpg
3b39f4f14f1b472e634cd1347dd67a30
74e649741e4f00af363b8fd25f28078d5ea58e67
F20101111_AAAYPR mcclister_d_Page_082.tif
f0a80c519f2dad60b4ae4279d15d5cb3
c8410974813885a0081d4a4c648fe5c81c91765f
6195 F20101111_AAAXFN mcclister_d_Page_215thm.jpg
cf6e56c3068fbeebf805e8509aeac8d6
1133b0ea7d237681482bd9dad329028b281046e2
6890 F20101111_AAAZML mcclister_d_Page_037thm.jpg
bdc8e66d4c9568096901e24ec0cd2e9a
3831d710e8549cbeecc7329b8671bc268786944d
46648 F20101111_AAAYCH mcclister_d_Page_204.pro
2488c20122b9fc81530059159051a6ec
ae174147fcc10a616c89bd2a6fa2310659a7bb89
6774 F20101111_AAAXSZ mcclister_d_Page_262thm.jpg
b9f0c37aa55106b85bf45afafc49c29e
b0407baad94e0606f302de9803ed690b0df60f31
F20101111_AAAYPS mcclister_d_Page_083.tif
459134b9cc38a6ff57e8e5697d58b715
2d01b698cceea977f620b5cb478904952fa7d069
59314 F20101111_AAAXFO mcclister_d_Page_011.pro
c85457bf5a9f4d61c8d92bc15ca11148
7c3fedefd93000872293ee1245e7ce33aa2a0e23
24594 F20101111_AAAZMM mcclister_d_Page_187.QC.jpg
59603cd3622f438c785f40b28df0c620
d8e173b8c33702bfba328945960e1c95472c9bd5
87229 F20101111_AAAYCI mcclister_d_Page_081.jpg
5ac15388fd281f98a3b6f90954d63ded
fba35dad496c7a15637968e16a4bde7c8cb17617
F20101111_AAAYPT mcclister_d_Page_090.tif
4951053b8340e974e092402bc06a4a8b
513920a20b4af3bdd857d2e3ac920b915b0b6ba3
121035 F20101111_AAAXFP mcclister_d_Page_171.jp2
968288685081aab13715b7e60394ffc9
247eddb1b83a0b19e24539440e918f1b54eda5e6
6611 F20101111_AAAZMN mcclister_d_Page_070thm.jpg
709f53d96317eed3b8c1aeaa83fed021
1e44e1f673ffbf945f2a2d07ae4f08e07a0d899f
2127 F20101111_AAAYCJ mcclister_d_Page_237.txt
8cbaea5a729d380d05f2df34aa1e02c8
893e797984f96d17dc5c62eed4596da7aeaebdc0
F20101111_AAAYPU mcclister_d_Page_091.tif
0749ecba1c89adb731813b62e13fbf0e
d7e857dc0e14a2751775e4afa1db88693ffc1f3e
7039 F20101111_AAAXFQ mcclister_d_Page_173thm.jpg
e120ea76dc5ad606c03b296e830afcf1
4237fa1ab11aaf817780a39d4915d7e083e95012
28754 F20101111_AAAZMO mcclister_d_Page_171.QC.jpg
5db37526381997549a6ae272e7bdbdc7
c1730c4a5305d2d8edbefca8dae54204c4da8094
29783 F20101111_AAAYCK mcclister_d_Page_096.QC.jpg
07cbfc3e5b19cf33364135192afb343f
0196100b90c06b91c42b0ff8de06ba9fac6df6f4
F20101111_AAAYPV mcclister_d_Page_093.tif
52ed028eb92019151a63c9ae15df3bac
ebfb1c91b96d25f7ebc2975d73eb3797e3bb6542
F20101111_AAAXFR mcclister_d_Page_207.txt
313547e97ef6b65bcc633874f32c3838
2afce78e19a55574f99cf1d6901a6ea427cf387e
6757 F20101111_AAAZMP mcclister_d_Page_181thm.jpg
cab6fb71f8d6ec3ada61942e7c69e172
a3e083316b4e75804cbf563963d4e0bdbb0976ae
57525 F20101111_AAAYCL mcclister_d_Page_273.pro
7a769bb93da757336e007b080334bdb1
f5a012a55d996ff80f6db3b2b9c43220659be819
F20101111_AAAYPW mcclister_d_Page_097.tif
121f244a58b7aa1dafe76c28db599a8d
4e5f567e0784cceba6c0186cb9635ef31b6aa9fb
6334 F20101111_AAAZMQ mcclister_d_Page_069thm.jpg
abef14c284ac6cd71eabe420cc8638f2
23d332a2086213f65fd2be15d2394dfdd9f622e6
117961 F20101111_AAAYCM mcclister_d_Page_177.jp2
f67ab7452886078cc683474422881456
6f4545f00b57b4bfdb9b5798806158d9e61cb872
F20101111_AAAYPX mcclister_d_Page_098.tif
a70f9257680a76ecaae0a89a4409f2a7
fecc849c158002fb52c4c5336a5546b8c0916bbf
25426 F20101111_AAAXFS mcclister_d_Page_251.QC.jpg
1bb5e771e6536f7e4817e0a482626971
875319a37ae8ca8a76ea7840891ad5c4df2a983a
28386 F20101111_AAAZMR mcclister_d_Page_125.QC.jpg
6a28188b0f3490bf262439259a64d23b
c186f83a8b50e355a25ef6878916f2666c406234
2271 F20101111_AAAYCN mcclister_d_Page_179.txt
3dcd033e39557021c56261c17787bf1b
295953f1b89a20849ea3b34308e9bb5d43e58e10
F20101111_AAAYPY mcclister_d_Page_104.tif
c2aa97f535d9092852acb2aec9869a47
aa72abec945a9087018bb276735ca3ad39dd3332
F20101111_AAAXFT mcclister_d_Page_009.tif
b5b7c90750913382f17cff039ededbde
a6e5902923061f42f708a4af14eebd1863c1a6d0
30636 F20101111_AAAZMS mcclister_d_Page_183.QC.jpg
bdee42f7b768b5a1736d6b4ef6b423f7
2eef7f72b5a39c80ae8f15958ce8b09200668854
F20101111_AAAYPZ mcclister_d_Page_106.tif
a07f8b6a275cb414e924edbc76b2d1a0
86713d25da3777b5b928c445805768a42da4c3bd
92436 F20101111_AAAXFU mcclister_d_Page_009.jpg
b859a7a079a4c5faf9dc8195691e9bf1
23efcd17f3c84534431b27cf9abd06ac023d2754
29583 F20101111_AAAZMT mcclister_d_Page_195.QC.jpg
ea234ae0e85af881b7b3684a60dde5c7
1af85200c9d1678563676597afd6799ba0c87d3d
103473 F20101111_AAAYCO mcclister_d_Page_187.jp2
f998548337c689d0c169927173aa8ea6
c51917ee40e8c30292f6f5d8ce2b062df92bb1fa
137863 F20101111_AAAXFV mcclister_d_Page_260.jp2
324ca926591a0b490d2d5ad62e3e7d76
d7548ca47ec09781b31dd33a7b415a0dc2591e1b
28594 F20101111_AAAZMU mcclister_d_Page_199.QC.jpg
bd6326935c6749fb04339d79625cc0f8
cb14bba6774c6f539aa7ac749c42466b4a28b567
F20101111_AAAXYA mcclister_d_Page_246.tif
90852a2ce3e3e45ca33adbf568b826d2
f976f50e2344e915457bd3cc878519752fd7bdf4
109686 F20101111_AAAYCP mcclister_d_Page_161.jpg
3e9915fa3e94ec9653db5b10c14f04c5
43a43e57e31a71782c1d23e5f66eaa8ccc627a03
60138 F20101111_AAAXFW mcclister_d_Page_193.pro
6b0607de5ba37ef230244420501be94c
10a236692ecdd93214f0f03a14284ced3690075c
6997 F20101111_AAAZMV mcclister_d_Page_166thm.jpg
f3414d445f92a9248902e5c02f1ab3f3
02e33cc1b808165c6c1aea31d85d344d980c0d4a
2373 F20101111_AAAXYB mcclister_d_Page_084.txt
b72f7d3fa15a3f344ffc25ec112f0625
5e487cfdb3600dec9ef46c644e92be3d978dc89a
99628 F20101111_AAAYCQ mcclister_d_Page_255.jpg
907aee42b242cd7e9416bb0fcac96c44
894839e489f376f6b43e6c11aff4e680cdccb0a0
29673 F20101111_AAAXFX mcclister_d_Page_164.QC.jpg
bbd6c30aceea4eb3ff92b68d39d3e229
d5cb61883ca4d1781116c1528b1b33a1e9668306
30661 F20101111_AAAZMW mcclister_d_Page_184.QC.jpg
cf919774c5d4b8736558d85ed00674bb
0bf25d16d86ce662b4f9b7a837336df05026aed4
F20101111_AAAXYC mcclister_d_Page_282.txt
9e55fe3ee7e26d59253b76a07f7cab78
bab4c4d886f6893ae6a8b4781ad0c2c00c1471c3
6866 F20101111_AAAYCR mcclister_d_Page_290thm.jpg
9f40c4f043a248d01fe8f783d83454b3
e46cc9bc708970c5b943b9e65d9ffe15cd0dd524
125477 F20101111_AAAXFY mcclister_d_Page_191.jp2
f3f691f2594b2ecd6ac773d7120f2f6c
d29792268f20cad734ca61d1c0ef3a3e5622d806
122086 F20101111_AAAXYD mcclister_d_Page_044.jp2
9af046eff71713b9aebec23c124e373a
2b31ef49b9a603dbc9337a7d2b4bccf0dddf48d4
6653 F20101111_AAAYCS mcclister_d_Page_028thm.jpg
9aa68435b81b517d80f6ce1fcf725910
502474cf11678bfa4a0baa2bf6774671538e84ee
35746 F20101111_AAAXFZ mcclister_d_Page_297.pro
3b5358ab8fab9f5a809bc4bcf734d94c
6f1608b573c9821b4a12673decd1008a7c957494
6573 F20101111_AAAZMX mcclister_d_Page_233thm.jpg
ea258d6027d89e16c3f248f57326b711
92056c1f3d205404873edccd95ceef786266f918
55051 F20101111_AAAXYE mcclister_d_Page_073.pro
5ffb0660fbf83e731cefbe8464556cad
a477e7ee285eefbf317730d8beb4aee51e62b236
1070399 F20101111_AAAYCT mcclister_d.pdf
06815d33c035813c782ba53d369e8cc3
197549c47a26f9c84b34f6c45892d0a719746f97
29234 F20101111_AAAZMY mcclister_d_Page_130.QC.jpg
9194918d2729899b99fe05faeb15db2a
0a1fe0a49018620e9fd1e311a75cf52895e2429c
344068 F20101111_AAAYCU UFE0021949_00001.mets
eec8c9c945d706c372dc52f84411c730
68c6845e31e8733bfe8a7013c9ea61a1d8c89099
6998 F20101111_AAAZMZ mcclister_d_Page_260thm.jpg
300ad4251ad9742dd5a2111b8e24ac67
bdf7fa91c943ba7d9a6c02af75388946489572cd
F20101111_AAAXYF mcclister_d_Page_260.tif
650a6610132d52cc7f6a02fc6ad35181
56256703962700edb5671ee9e1290fc137554756
29077 F20101111_AAAXYG mcclister_d_Page_163.QC.jpg
c9e8d068e748b81d28b9441de99023b4
aeb241b4c195786450cf4c624659754ac236e2d1
61859 F20101111_AAAYVA mcclister_d_Page_064.pro
7fe3aac40e0be361b6f85b0b6489d287
81d0bf88f0ad5383b9703f47c13e6eb4a8801a30
2282 F20101111_AAAXYH mcclister_d_Page_217.txt
98235e6cadb1c51c6993f542d10f556e
d231af13e8bb274a9a776953ecf31c1b078ce419
18967 F20101111_AAAYCX mcclister_d_Page_001.jpg
86a452dfb11f61589bdbf1bc51651b7c
8f4a734c47586356cb0c0a543e88e2c65dfbdcf8
92794 F20101111_AAAXYI mcclister_d_Page_152.jpg
2adea0831dfc6588caabf1ddfaf5112a
6e3979015b55624e50a639119213ffab0df3fb41
3426 F20101111_AAAYCY mcclister_d_Page_002.jpg
007a7b66988c78502e6f7bd646655504
35492dc701b57e4b15f80ded5078b52c9dbf677d
60672 F20101111_AAAYVB mcclister_d_Page_065.pro
8211d15c69cffd9dd14decaea2e265f0
c6fb63a4d7b7fbdca935904b93a0f3423a30fdc2
2065 F20101111_AAAXYJ mcclister_d_Page_036.txt
da97f5be21ebf9966225740edc1a42db
1e7d3638aeb3c1cfbe4ab2c01580b191bef0cfdb
14066 F20101111_AAAYCZ mcclister_d_Page_003.jpg
a1a9c9ea03ce08ae32ae01a2d08bc897
f64747141e66364f854ab57628b77b78e0458269
53137 F20101111_AAAYVC mcclister_d_Page_066.pro
952f0fed90d97549706f3d3b8c5190b8
7941659deeb1577a9c33dc2b651cd0b08118af30
122944 F20101111_AAAXYK mcclister_d_Page_147.jp2
a0601f81a30026dc9100e5c2a791b7ca
48857c21ae4392071f5f2eede14809efc2aeb17e
55084 F20101111_AAAYVD mcclister_d_Page_067.pro
1c99fbfa45e54b07c028e768e070f4d7
9d3b6426b6619dd45a79a60f1712f2eb8cf9a15d
116345 F20101111_AAAXYL mcclister_d_Page_071.jp2
b44c7a20d6e62bad1b70bdb03ca54399
a6f39df8a5afb8cba326f79c94ac7c0b38f0f8a1
50352 F20101111_AAAYVE mcclister_d_Page_068.pro
40bb947f7491843bc50557d19dc01119
f30cb8676c2b81ab7ac05c2df20bd8631739a26f
F20101111_AAAXLA mcclister_d_Page_045.tif
1f50a2bc77a3961e92b0889610df21a9
307f162a687c1ba42b404a65dbca541b17099efa
27699 F20101111_AAAXYM mcclister_d_Page_232.QC.jpg
0ed3ee4eb062faec2dc93f1d6a28be72
b0fdb41e086905bed90f48b11cfa6a6a3be30efb
51222 F20101111_AAAYVF mcclister_d_Page_069.pro
8e418656df8f17c89fcc38342120d064
979a5f8d91209af514b17df84654c2120ec1e3ff
133352 F20101111_AAAXLB mcclister_d_Page_107.jp2
baa0415c0397f250e03a6adebe72961e
4964a63c0aabaa7f97aa507394abc82aa6ef306b
6672 F20101111_AAAXYN mcclister_d_Page_041thm.jpg
697203fe8e92084a88d6150504fde326
9a692c4b7f9f82020c18b01e70933252d6d6819b
55842 F20101111_AAAYVG mcclister_d_Page_071.pro
cd88ecfa0b6bd32865f5e7548bff0d11
b04d21ac850bf281ce7d43bfcadce251cbf097f9
F20101111_AAAXLC mcclister_d_Page_063.txt
ea59b7de8f406bf6cdde630e3371d9e5
87d1ed07ac777d1d898276d988f84ff52d4e1043
27557 F20101111_AAAZSA mcclister_d_Page_240.QC.jpg
ad7459b21dd9d7ad55b46cfbb02effcd
70709083315924f7e0b6ee3fb730bd13b0043558
137473 F20101111_AAAXYO mcclister_d_Page_027.jp2
8ecb1bbe46bb26d86a23ff1cd33adfb3
72a2d24b0ed0910069e9a5b203bb02fb5c020f58
60385 F20101111_AAAYVH mcclister_d_Page_075.pro
c1bc1ccb43659de6822d0f00b70ed862
7ce55c68b9a6010a2958c501800f6373196c0c19
1462 F20101111_AAAXLD mcclister_d_Page_297.txt
9c74c251073027052442ec576538c045
f1a0e3c77de178ed10bf71988d83f20b0d9cf412
6614 F20101111_AAAZSB mcclister_d_Page_240thm.jpg
b243d63d795bdd8bcecd5be457bd2b7e
e4cc61e6fa991838b7d32afa21ae6e2d92e24e43
F20101111_AAAXYP mcclister_d_Page_146.tif
e63d4300d0be62fd8fa42e678bf792e5
3d78a27b9ca563e344049114b6d32bbd7c274bb0
56491 F20101111_AAAYVI mcclister_d_Page_076.pro
ca3ae5677e5b8e1df61fc8390d19230f
fc0a538ac1d8aa0b8b68d516f93328069808d322
F20101111_AAAXLE mcclister_d_Page_152.txt
a2c9efbc37ff8e8a31a1e5b26761c121
4863dfef6326780e04f7daad681ea28280ca9eaa
27285 F20101111_AAAZSC mcclister_d_Page_244.QC.jpg
a4998408f5e433b9fe79ae2b1fd4a25a
7ce2eb80f09a96a03a4bd886043b181bdfc86556
F20101111_AAAXYQ mcclister_d_Page_034thm.jpg
be6c1e60d47ff9ad9da0e1da689d1021
be8af619d6d2da022f06651e9709f29d9adfc064
59185 F20101111_AAAYVJ mcclister_d_Page_077.pro
208ec28859a47c25be41a4d980826246
96ac786471d3a2b73ceb16480f6c83817a4e2b82
95363 F20101111_AAAXLF mcclister_d_Page_196.jpg
a3b7bb8f5f73847ddbed23e5e8066bfe
e7522c190dedae80d3c3a6ac36ef91f533fca9d9
6918 F20101111_AAAZSD mcclister_d_Page_245thm.jpg
7a2e4a6f802661fff7eea989f618186c
addf138a16f5dd565255d5ce0f46ef670c1535fe
F20101111_AAAXYR mcclister_d_Page_028.tif
e83ee078901d41b787c03df906b1084e
629191b6907341c3bedf3edb4476566eb59e2dfa
56328 F20101111_AAAYVK mcclister_d_Page_078.pro
474516524fb384a939eb23527b42208b
7b4c6bad251d03d16078a42921e32980a03abdeb
2595 F20101111_AAAXLG mcclister_d_Page_134.txt
4795ab6bafa0dfbd800951eb617ba012
cc32e43b9487a25b39fdfefc3b394a998bd6b4bd
6724 F20101111_AAAZSE mcclister_d_Page_256thm.jpg
b2da44739ce9704469efff0d8be83dad
0a5906a309e70128682a3f4e362ad96bcd449ad8
2159 F20101111_AAAXYS mcclister_d_Page_033.txt
8a83a3f2ff9458127e56191a50c14d28
c95c5ec4efb47d7a8a0ac1976edf1bf4bf88073e
57779 F20101111_AAAYVL mcclister_d_Page_079.pro
768c8f51307a231752c6501b5c072c6e
970afb244e2499c2d5f17c3ec0fc659ebaf23fdd
28097 F20101111_AAAXLH mcclister_d_Page_213.QC.jpg
ed482b485688fd57d9ba863c2f97fea1
f789632141af36042aa679334e98e311a04c6c68
93288 F20101111_AAAYIA mcclister_d_Page_261.jpg
f4f51e3423bd2605ecc6fc77b1fc0e99
a77072f5c5f19a3cf2d2bd1063b3f1d6ee287f9b







ETHNICITY AND JEWISH IDENTITY IN JOSEPHUS


By

DAVID McCLISTER























A DISSERTATION PRESENTED TO THE GRADUATE SCHOOL
OF THE UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT
OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF
DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY

UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA

2008
































2008 David McClister
































To the memory of my father, Dorval L. McClister, who instilled in me a love of learning;
to the memory of Dr. Phil Roberts, my esteemed colleague;
and to my wife, Lisa, without whose support this dissertation, or much else that I do,
would not have been possible.









ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

I gladly recognize my supervisory committee chair (Dr. Konstantinos Kapparis, Associate

Professor in the Classics Department at the University of Florida). I also wish to thank the other

supervisory committee members (Dr. Jennifer Rea, Dr. Gareth Schmeling, and Dr. Gwynn

Kessler as a reader from the Religious Studies Department). It is an honor to have their

contributions and to work under their guidance. I also wish to thank the library staff at the

University of Florida and at Florida College (especially Ashley Barlar) who did their work so

well and retrieved the research materials necessary for this project. I also wish to thank my

family for their patient indulgence as I have robbed them of time to give attention to the work

necessary to pursue my academic interests.

BWGRKL [Greek] Postscript Type 1 and TrueTypeT font Copyright 1994-2006

BibleWorks, LLC. All rights reserved. These Biblical Greek and Hebrew fonts are used with

permission and are from BibleWorks, software for Biblical exegesis and research.









TABLE OF CONTENTS

page

A C K N O W L E D G M E N T S ..............................................................................................................4

ABSTRAC T .......................................................................... 7

CHAPTER

1 INTRODUCTION ............... ................. ........... ................................ .9

Josephu s and H is W ritings...................................................................... ......................... 9
The Bellum Judaicum ............................................................ ........ .... 13
T he A n tiquita tes Judaicae ............................................ ............................................. 19
The Vita and the Contra Apionem ............................................................................. 25
A Brief H history of Research ............................................................................ 29
The Present Study and Its C ontribution................................................................................40

2 ETHNICITY, SELF-DEFINITION, AND THE ANCIENTS ............................................47

T h e C on cept of E th n city ............................................................................. ....................4 7
Greek Ethnicity and the Rom an W orld ............................................................................ 67
Josephus and E ethnicity .......................... ...................... .. .. .... ........ ........... 84
C o n c lu sio n ............ ..................... ................. ....................... ................ 8 9

3 THE MILIEU IN WHICH JOSEPHUS LIVED AND WROTE............................... 93

M istreatm ent of Jew s in Greco-Rom an Society ......................... .................. ..................93
Josephu s' O w n E experiences ............................................... ...................... ......................110
C o n clu sio n ...... ... ................... ......... .......................................................1 14

4 HELLENISTIC CULTURE AND JEWISH ACCULTURATION ...............................1.17

The Q question of Jew ish H ellenization .................................................................................117
C o n c lu sio n ................... ......................................................... ................ 14 4

5 JEWISH ETHNICITY IN JOSPEHUS' BELLUMJUDAICUM................................. 147

The Bellum Judaicum and the Greek Tradition of Historiography .................................... 147
Some Greek Elements Within the Bellum Judaicum ............................... ..................167
C on clu sion ......... .. ......... ....... ......... ....... ........................................................17 8

6 JOSEPHUS' PRESENTATION OF THE JEWS IN HIS ANTIQUITATES JUDAICAE ....181

The Fluid Nature of Foundational History/Myth................ .... ...............181
Examples of Josephus' Positive Portrayal of Jews and Jewish History
by M eans of G reek M odels............................................... .................................. 188









Use of Greek Forms, Paradigms, and Terms .............. ............ ..................... ..........188
Exempla ............. ...... ... .................. ........... ............... 204
Stories of Positive Impressions on Non-Jews ......... .......................... ......213
Management of Negative Impressions ................................. ........................... 217
C o n c lu sio n ........................................... .. .............................................................................2 3 7

7 JEWISH ETHNICITY IN JOSEPHUS' VITA AND CONTRA APIONEM........................239

T h e V ita .............. ............................................................................................ ............. ..... 2 3 9
The C ontra Apionem ............................ ........................ ..... ............ .. ............. 244
C o n clu sio n ................................64.............................

8 SUM M ARY AND CONCLUSION S............................. .. ............................................. 268

REFERENCE LIST ............................. .................................. 279

B IO G R A PH IC A L SK E T C H ............................................................................. ....................297





































6









Abstract of Dissertation Presented to the Graduate School
of the University of Florida in Partial Fulfillment of the
Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy

ETHNICITY AND JEWISH IDENTITY IN JOSEPHUS

By

David McClister

May 2008

Chair: Konstantinos Kapparis
Major: Classical Studies

Flavius Josephus was a Jewish historian who lived in the first century CE. When the First

Jewish War began in 66 CE, Josephus was given a leading role in the defense of Galilee in

northern Palestine. He was captured by the Roman forces and accompanied them to Jerusalem

where he witnessed the fall of the city in 70 CE. After that Josephus was taken to Rome where he

wrote an account of the Jewish war with Rome (the Bellum Judaicum), a history of the Jews (the

Antiquitates Judaicae), a short autobiography (the Vita), and a defense of the antiquity of the

Jews (the Contra Apionem). All of these works were intended for a non-Jewish audience.

Josephus wrote at a time when anti-Jewish sentiments were common, and the recent defeat

at the hands of Rome only exacerbated the negative image ascribed to Jews. It is the thesis of this

dissertation that Josephus produced his literary works not simply to satisfy the curiosity of

interested Gentiles concerning Jewish origins and customs, but to craft and negotiate an ethnicity

for the Jews that would portray them as a people worthy of Roman respect. Ethnic identity is a

social construct that is shaped in a complex matrix of psychological and social factors, and often

in response to a perceived crisis that threatens a person's or group's sense of social belonging.

Josephus lived under the kinds of conditions in which groups typically feel the need to adjust and









reassert their social identity. I suggest that this lens can provide a useful way of reading

Josephus, and can account for the shape and purpose of his works.

Josephus' strategy for creating this ethnic portrait was to depict the Jews as having

essentially the same qualities of the noble Greeks of the past, whom the Romans respected. In

this undertaking Josephus was participating in a long-standing debate within Jewish circles over

the limits and extent of Hellenization among them. What was new was that Josephus used the

vehicle of Greek historiography to accomplish his purpose. All of his literary works drew heavily

on well-known Greek historiographical models for their presentations of the events, their

characterizations of the Jewish people, and their refutations of Gentile slanders. The result was a

picture of Jewish history and piety in which the Jews are seen to embody well-respected Greek

ideals.

It is not known how widely Josephus' works circulated in his own day or shortly

thereafter, nor do we know how successful they were in their purpose of creating a bold, new

picture of Jewish identity. There are indications that Josephus' works did not effect much change

in how Gentiles viewed Jews in the Roman empire. However, the success of the project

(measured in terms of social acceptance) is not the object of this study, nor is it a criterion for

judging the importance of what Josephus wrote. One of the enduring values of Josephus' works

is that they demonstrate, in antiquity, an attempt by a marginalized group to negotiate an

ethnicity, and thus they provide an important window into the complexities of Jewish life in the

Roman empire.









CHAPTER 1
INTRODUCTION

Josephus and His Writings

Joseph ben Matthias, more commonly known by his Roman name, Flavius Josephus, was

born in Jerusalem in 37/38 CE.1 He grew up among the Jewish aristocracy and dabbled in the

various Jewish religious sects, ultimately deciding to identify himself with the Pharisees. When

he was twenty-six years old (c. 63/64 CE), he participated in a delegation to Rome to plead for

the release of Jewish priests who had been imprisoned by the procurator of Judea, Marcus

Antonius Felix. There he came into contact with influential people in Roman society and

government, including Poppea, Nero's wife. He returned to Palestine and became caught up in

the early stages of the First Jewish War, and in the fall of 66 CE he was put in charge of the

defense of Galilee. Vespasian and the Roman fifth, tenth, and 15th legions arrived in Galilee from

Syria and laid siege to the town of Jotapata where Josephus was serving as general. The town fell

but Josephus was spared because he predicted that Vespasian, as well as his son Titus, would

become emperor. Josephus then accompanied the legionary forces to Jerusalem and witnessed

the fall of the city in 70 CE. After that he was removed to Rome, granted citizenship, and wrote

several literary works.

Josephus' first literary product was an account of the First Jewish War in seven books; his

Jewish War ('IoTopia 'Iouc''Kou TroXEiou T rp6b 'Po~aiou; known later by the Latin title Bellum

Judaicum) was written between 75 and 81 CE,2 possibly under imperial patronage. This work



1 The first year of the emperor Gaius. Vit. 2; BJ 1.3.
2 M. Brighton, The Sicarii in Josephus' Judean War (PhD Diss. University of California,
Irvine, 2005) 58. In Vit. 361 Josephus says amrolt ieTr~6)K TOro ccuTOKpcropot T~& PLPXL'a [d6vov
o v TwV 'pyOv ')i PETro T vV ("I gave the books to the emperors themselves while the events
were all but still being seen"). Parts of the work thus must have been finished before the death of
Vespasian in June of 79 CE. The book seems to show signs of later revision. S. Schwartz, 'The









was first written in an Aramaic version, which has not survived, but Josephus then composed a

version of it in Greek.3 Next he wrote a history of the Jewish people, the Antiquities of the Jews

('Iou6iL'Kfi 'ApXLcaooyL( ; later known by the Latin title Antiquitates Judaicae), in twenty

books, which was published in 93 or 94 CE.4 Josephus' autobiographical work, the Life

('IwooFTrou PLo(; later known as the Vita), which mostly deals with his time as commander in

Galilee, was written between 94 and 96 CE5 and made an appendix to the Antiquitates Judaicae.

The purpose of this short treatise was to defend himself and his conduct during the war against

criticisms that had been leveled by a political rival, Justus of Tiberias. His last literary

production,6 a polemical apologetical treatise in two books, came to be called Against Apion

(Ilepi 'ApXaLTrL6TO 'Iou6aia)v Aoyo; later known by the Latin title Contra Apionem). While

this later Latin title singles out Apion (a well-known Egyptian scholar and literary critic; died c.

45 CE) as the object of the work's response (&vTLpprlotL), he is actually only the subject of the


Composition and Publication of Josephus' "Bellum Judaicum" Book 7', HTR 79 (1986) 373-86.
All translations in this study are my own unless otherwise noted.
3 Josephus says TrpouOietrlv y ToL Karc rilv 'PoU4caov YE0ioviLav 'EXXU&6L yXooi.
[EtrapcPXV 'a TOL &v) pappapoL TO TrccrpL'c ouvrTacL U'VE'TrE4i*a TrpoTEpov 4rly'lo(xoUca ("I
have proposed to relate in the Greek language, for those under Roman rule, translating those
things which I formerly sent to the upper barbarians, having first laid them out in my native
language"). However, e'trapcLdv here is best understood as rewriting instead of translating. The
Greek reads like an original composition and not simply a translation from an Aramaic source.
G. Hata, 'Is the Greek Version of Josephus' "Jewish War" a Translation or a Rewriting of the
First Version?', JQR 66 (1975) 90-6.
4 In AJ20.267, Josephus says "the present day" (Tfj v6v ... Tl~ppa) was the 13th year of
Domitian and Josephus' 56th year. Some scholars working with source-critical tools have
suggested that the AJmay have gone through more than one edition, but the internal evidence for
two editions is slim. D. Barish, 'The "Autobiography" of Josephus and the Hypothesis of a
Second Edition of His "Antiquities",' HTR 71 (1978) 61-71.
5 Barish 75.
6 It has sometimes been suggested that AJ 20.267 indicates that Josephus intended to
write another account of the First Jewish War. The context, however, shows that Josephus was
speaking of the Vita. H. Petersen, 'Real and Alleged Literary Projects of Josephus', AJP 79
(1958) 259-62. Josephus then mentioned (20.268) plans for a theological treatise. Petersen (263-
5) identified it with the Contra Apionem, but Feldman thinks a different work was envisioned (L.
Feldman, Josephus, 9: Jewish Antiquities Books 18-20 (Cambridge, MA 1969) 531.









second book. The treatise addresses claims of several critics of Jews and of Judaism that were

circulating in Josephus' own day, of whom Apion was the most outspoken. As the Greek title

indicates, the basic focus of the work is a defense of the antiquity of the Jewish people, a topic

that had already been addressed in the Antiquitates Judaicae.

The writings of Josephus were transmitted in antiquity by Christian scribes (as all classical

works were), and the edition of Niese, published in seven volumes from 1885 to 1895, has

generally remained the standard scholarly critical edition to the present day. Later editions have

not strayed far from Niese in spite of the fact that his text relied too heavily on too few textual

witnesses. In particular, Niese relied heavily on Codex Palatinus Graecus 14 (P; Vaticanus, 10th

century) for the Vita, and did not give enough consideration to later manuscripts that appear to

have preserved better readings. Similarly, he basically relied on Codex Parisinus Graecus 142

and Codex Ambrosianus (A; Mediolanensis), both from the 10th century, for the Bellum

Judaicum, and Codex Regius Parisinus (R; 14th century) and Codex Oxoniensis (15th century) for

the Antiquitates Judaicae. 8 The Contra Apionem survives in a single exemplar, Codex

Laurentianus (L), which lacks 2.52-113. The missing section is extant in an Old Latin translation

produced under Cassiodorus, c. 550 CE, which has yet to be fully exploited for purposes of

textual criticism of the Greek text.9 The present study uses the Niese edition, and consults the





7 Flavii, Josephi, Opera. Edidit et apparatu critic instruxit Benedictus Niese. 7 vols.
(Berlin 1885-1895). This was the first truly critical Greek text of Josephus. A concise history of
editions appears at the end of E. Schiirer, 'Josephus, Flavius' in S. Jackson (ed.), Schaff-Herzog
Encyclopedia of Religious Knowledge, 6 (Grand Rapids 1953) 236.
8 L. Feldman, 'Flavius Josephus Revisited', in ANRWII.21.2 (New York 1984) 765. The
new commentary on Josephus published by Brill (not yet complete) is based on the Niese text
with few emendations.
9 G. Richards and R. Shutt, 'Critical Notes on Josephus' Antiquities', CQ 31 (1937) 170-
77.









eclectic text of Thackeray, which generally follows Niese and the Teubner edition by Nabero1

and is printed in the Loeb volumes of Josephus.11

Josephus' literary output has secured him a prominent place in later Greek historiography.

The Vita is the only extant pre-Christian autobiography.12 The Bellum Judaicum is our sole

source for most of our knowledge of the First Jewish War,13 and has also long been of interest to

historians for its portrayal of the political situation behind the revolt, to scholars of Judaism and

Jewish history as an important source of information for a key moment in that history and for the

diverse nature of Judaism in the first century CE, and to New Testament scholars as a source of

information for an important period of earliest Christianity. The monumental Antiquitates

Judaicae is the only complete, full-scale secular account of Jewish history to survive antiquity14

and was a remarkable attempt to introduce Jewish history and religion to the Gentile world. The

Vita and Contra Apionem provide striking examples of direct apologetic confrontation with

Hellenistic culture. Together the writings of Josephus provide us with an invaluable and wide

view of the complexities of Jewish life within the Roman empire. Most significant for this study

is the fact that Josephus stands in a unique place among the ancient Hellenistic historiographers

because he had a foot in three different worlds at the same time: Jewish, Roman, and Greek.


10 S. Naber, Flavii losephi opera omnia. 6 vols. (Leipzig 1888-1896).
11 H. Thackeray, R. Marcus, and L. Feldman (trans.), Josephus. 9 vols. (Loeb Classical
Library; Cambridge, MA 1956-1969). Of this text, Feldman says "there have been few reasons
for challenging, in any substantial way, the readings of that text." L. Feldman, Judean Antiquities
1-4: Translation and Commentary (Leiden 2000) xxxvii.
12 S. Cohen, Josephus in Galilee and Rome. His Vita and Development as a Historian
(Boston 2002), 101.
13 Dio Cassius' description of the siege of Jerusalem (66.4.1-7.2) is the only other
substantial account. Tacitus has a short account of the war in Hist. 5.1-13, and Suetonius'
biographies of the Flavian emperors mention scattered details. A summary of the non-Josephan
data is in S. Cohen, Josephus in Galilee and Rome, 243-60.
14 The only other work that comes close is the Liber Antiquitatum Biblicarum by Pseudo-
Philo, written some time in the first century CE, and which selectively covers the Biblical
narrative from Genesis to the death of king Saul.









The Bellum Judaicum

The questions of the original target audience of Josephus' works, and why he felt

compelled to write them, are complicated. Josephus says that the Aramaic version of the Bellum

Judaicum was written roLt &vvo pUppUdpoL; ("to the upper barbarians").15 These people could be

the same ones mentioned a few lines later, Ii&p0ouv ptv Ka~ BapuXwovouo 'Ap&pov rU Toi~

TroppWordTo K~L TOb irTp Ei6ppdnTrv 6[6()uXov tiiv 'A6Laprlvot; ("the Parthians and the

Babylonians, the farthest Arabians and our fellow-countrymen beyond the Euphrates, and the

Adiabenenes").16 It seems easier to believe that Josephus wrote his original account in Aramaic

for Palestinian Jews, since that was their (and his) native language, and to conclude with Rajak

that "We have, then, to take it that Josephus is fancifully exaggerating or engaging in a certain

amount of wishful thinking when he extends his prospective readership beyond his own people

to the oriental world at large.""17

Josephus never specifically identifies the intended audience of his Greek version of the

Bellum Judaicum other than to say that KdyG) l)v &VXOA[Lc4aoL KcdL TrOvoL 4teyioLTOL d&XXduXoO

c(3v "EXX1iOL TE KUCL 'PW4icLOL rTi4v ~vTI~Tri T^iV KaropOWaciTov &'v(OerlIOL ("I, with great

expenses and labors, being a foreigner, am presenting this record of accomplishments to both

Greeks and Romans")18 and TrpouOiTrlv EyY TotoL Kar& Tiv 'PoLacaov liy't~ovav ("I have set

forth [an account] for those under Roman rule").19 Mason has suggested a Roman audience was

particularly in view,20 and Josephus says that the emperor Titus himself gave the work his




15 BJ1.3.
16 BJ 1.6.
17 T. Rajak, Josephus: The Historian andHis Society (Philadelphia 1983) 181.
18 BJ 1.16. He similarly mentions both Greeks and Romans as his target audience in 1.6.
19BJ 1.3.
20 S. Mason, Josephus and the New Testament (Peabody 1992) 64.









approval.21 However, a wider audience cannot be ruled out and, in fact, seems warranted.

Josephus was well aware of the differences between Greeks and Romans; he distinguished

between them often enough in his writings. Thus when he says that he wrote for both Greeks and

Romans, it must mean that he had more than just a Roman audience in mind. He aimed his work

at the general Hellenistic reading public made up of both groups. It is most reasonable to believe,

then, that the Bellum Judaicum was intended generally for the Greek-speaking world of the

Roman empire which would include Romans, Greeks, and Josephus' own people, the Jews, most

of whom were conversant in Greek as well.22 The fact that the emperor gave it his approval need

not mean that Josephus' account was aimed only at a Roman audience. It simply means that the

emperor judged it to be appropriate reading for the general public of the empire.

What purpose was the Bellum Judaicum intended to serve? Josephus does not explicitly

say why he wrote his first, Aramaic account. Many earlier scholars believed it was written to

discourage further rebellion in the east,23 and that the Greek version of the Bellum Judaicum

served the same purpose for Palestinian Jews. However, this view has increasingly come to be

questioned by modem scholars. The approach that the Bellum Judaicum served as Roman

imperial propaganda first does not do justice to the nature of Josephus' account, which does not

portray the revolt as stemming from the Jewish people generally nor from the Jews in Palestine

as a whole. Josephus lays the blame for the war on a minority of Jews who were bent on causing



21 Ap. 1.50-52; Vit. 1.363.
22 Rajak concludes that "the Jewish Diaspora was always the primary setting for Josephus
as a writer" and "what Josephus wrote was a report on a tragic event, issued for those who were
interested" (Josephus: The Historian and His Society 178 and 184).
23 Thackeray's suggestion was typical: "Josephus was commissioned by the conquerors
to write the official history of the war for propagandist purposes. It was a manifesto, intended as
a warning to the East of the futility of further opposition and to allay the after-war thirst for
revenge, which ultimately found vent in the fierce out-breaks under Trajan and Hadrian." H. St.
John Thackeray, Josephus: The Man and the Historian (New York 1929) 27.









trouble and who defiled the Jewish temple in doing so. He also depicts the Romans as having had

good relations with the Jews until the war, and reluctant to destroy the city during the war.24

Even more, the Bellum Judaicum was designed to show that Judaism and Roman power were not

incompatible, as the Jewish God used the Romans to punish the rebels in Jerusalem. This is

hardly imperial propaganda.25 These considerations make it unlikely that his account was

designed for application to politics on the larger level of the client kingdom26 or for application

to those nations that had hostile intentions toward Rome.

The Greek version of the Bellum Judaicum did not have a (Roman) propagandist purpose

either, as Josephus' own statements in his introduction show. Josephus was well aware that

historiography could be, and regularly was, written for purposes other than recording the events,

or was exploited for political purposes. He notes:

ol iv ou TrUxpUXTuXO6vTE TOL; Trpcy[txoJLV ULXX' C(KOT oUXXEyovTE EKiC(L Kc(L &Cdt(XOVX
6LTryilJXTaa CO0LOTLKG;) 'VxypUd(OU)OLV, ol TrcapayEv1JEvo L 6e KOXCaKiEL- T TI Trp6(
Poaicaou "i [JLLOCEL TO) TrTp6 'Iou6aLOUi Kaa(XEU6OvTaXL 'TUV TTpayt(Xl)v TTEPLE'XEL 6 ai)TOiL
O7TOIu tV KaTIryopLCav O"TrOu 6e E'yKG 4Lov rTC ouyypY[aL4Ua TO 6' 'lKpLPe Ttr LoopTaPL(X


("Those who were not present for these events, but having gathered random and discordant
bits from rumor, write narratives sophistically, and those who were present, either for



24 See, e.g., BJ 1.10.
25 M. Goodman, "Josephus as Roman Citizen," in F. Parente and J. Sievers (eds.),
Josephus and the History of the Greco-Roman Period: Essays in Memory of Morton Smithi
(Studia Post-Biblica 41, Leiden 1994) 337-8.
26 Cf Rajak, Josephus: The Historian and His Society, 181: .. it is hard to see how
Josephus' subject-matter could ever have served to deliver a short, sharp message to the east. It is
hardly plausible that the news of Rome's effective suppression of a petty province in revolt
would have much impressed the ruler of a great empire like Parthia." Thus when Josephus says
(3.108) Tac0Ca ev olv 6t &e0XOv ou 'PPoucLouI E'Trcavioa( Trpoa(pokU[evo; TOOOUTOV Ooov 'EL; T
TrOapa uOLav TWoV KEXELp OEvov) KL EL( UTroTroTriV Tv T VEw veo tpLCt(6ov ("I have therefore
recounted these things, not as preferring to commend the Romans, but for the comfort of those
who have been conquered and for the prevention of those who make insurrection"), we should
probably understand this to mean that he hoped any surviving radical faction in Judea would not
attempt a second revolt.









flattery to the Romans or hatred against the Jews, falsely report the events, and their
writings contain either accusation or encomium, but nowhere historical accuracy").27

In the Antiquitates Judaicae, he referred to the Bellum Judaicum saying EpLUo'rIv EK6Lr y oacoacL

6tL Tobi) v TO yp)eitLv AuLcatvopvoui trv d~&XOLtav ("I was compelled to set out the truth in

detail on account of those who are doing harm in their writings"). He therefore made a careful

point that he was aware of the extremes to which historiography was subject. While he claimed

that T6v 'Iou6calv Trp6b 'Po4Uioui TrOlXElov ouoTivr 4[EYLoTov ou 46vov TGrV KcO' 'i4i& oXE66v

6 KcL o)v d(KOT TrcapELXl4 ~tv ev Ti TroXEWv Trpb6 Tr6OXEL( ij EOvc6v 'EOveoL ouppcayvuov ("the war of

the Jews with Rome constituted the greatest war, not only of those which have been in our time

but also nearly the greatest of which we have received a report, either of city fighting with city or

nation with nation"),28 he also criticized other historians and their accounts of the war saying

pouAovTcaL Fev y&p teyay'ou Toib 'Pwoicaou dULTro6ELKVUtLV KaWErapXXouoLV 6i dU'L Tr& 'Iou6i5 v

KaL TaTrTLvoOUoLV ouX 6opG 6E TrT(; aV ELvaCL t 5EYdXOL 6OKOEV OiL LKpOi) VEVLKrIK6OtE ("they

wish to demonstrate Roman greatness, but they constantly put down and lessen the actions of the

Jews, but I do not see how those who have defeated the little might be considered to be great").29

He gives further notice that Ob pT iv ey T otL ; eTTrpouoiL & .'Paio.CLv VTL..XOVELKG)V cuELv T&

TU6V 64io01Xvv 6Li~yvV ("I for my part have determined not to exalt the deeds of my fellow-

countrymen out of jealousy against those who exaggerate the deeds of the Romans"). It seems

clear that Josephus did not see himself as writing military or political propaganda for either side.

The theory that Josephus wrote to discourage rebellion also puts him in a compromising

position personally, since he himself participated in the rebellion in Palestine, and discouraging

rebellion would make him look like a traitor to his own people. There was definitely a tension in


27 BJ 1.1-2.
28 J 1.1.
29 BJ 1.7-8.









which Josephus found himself as he wrote under Roman sponsorship. He had to take care not to

offend his imperial patron, and at the same time he felt loyalty to his people and homeland. The

degree to which this compromised Josephus' portrayal of things is an ongoing debate. However,

it is clear that Josephus himself was aware of this tension, and he addressed it at the beginning of

his work. He says Toik 6' EiTr TO p&yTpayc CL X6youi &d(miOT1 L r 6iacOeoEL KcL TOlt( EiauTro

TrOaeoL 6i60Ob) oTT~opeoOcaL Ti T~i rarpL6oa ou( opait ("but I attribute my words on the

events to my disposition and to my own feelings, being given over to lament for the calamities of

my homeland")30 and el 6' TuL; oca Trpbc Toi) rupavvouv ij ~b orpoTLKbV CdmTV KCrTIyopLKw(5

XEYOL[EV "i TOL 6U5OT)UXULCxo L Trf| TrrXpL6o0 ETTrLoiTEvovUE ouiKO4)vVTOLrT 6L66T r Trap&U TObv Tr

LoTopiCLa v6Lov ouyyvylv rv Tc TracOEL ("if indeed there should be someone who with complaint

might slander what we might say accusingly about the tyrants or their piracy or the ill fortune of

my homeland, let him give sympathetic indulgence for what is outside the standard of the

historian").31 Either Josephus was feigning patriotism, or he truly lamented the recent calamity.

And if he was a traitor, then why write an account that attempted to absolve the majority of Jews

of blame? The nature of the account itself suggests that Josephus was no traitor to his people. He

thought that the best policy for him was not to deny that his closeness to the events affected his

portrayal of them. Josephus was aware of his delicate position, personally and politically, and

thought of himself neither as a traitor to his people nor as the author of imperial propaganda.

Josephus' purpose in the Greek Bellum Judaicum was instead corrective and apologetic.

The passages quoted above repeatedly refer to inaccuracies of other accounts of the war due

largely in part to a desire either to flatter the Romans or to denigrate the Jews (or both). Of other

accounts he says KaclOL ye LGoopiap a(c M& TTLypdeLVL T'OXtLooLV E v ale Trpopbc TO~ ti6ev iyLi~


30 BJ 1.9.
31 BJ1.11.









6rlXouv KcL TOl GKOTrOU 6OKOUOLV 'E'OLyE 6LaUaprUveLv ("Although they [other historians of the

war] presume to entitle their accounts 'histories,' in which additionally they set forth nothing that

is sound, they seem to me to miss their own mark completely").32 He also remarks &roTrov

Tyrlodivo[EVO TrepLL6tLV TrXCa(o[ivv EiTrI TirrLKOuToL( TrpUy4Uao[ L Triv &XAd'OELcv ("I thought it

improper to ignore the straying from the truth on such great matters")33 and r& p v 'ipya ErT'

U&KpLPELXa &0q oTEpov Gi EEL[L ("I am setting forth the deeds of both sides with precision").34

Such bold claims invite public scrutiny and are not the kinds of things one would normally

propose if he were writing slanted political propaganda knowingly filled with historical

inaccuracies.

Josephus may have been refuting a wide-spread view that the Jewish populace of Palestine

as a whole started and actively participated in the war, or that Jews everywhere were the enemies

of the Romans. As cases in point, Tacitus prefaced his account of the Jewish revolt with a

polemic against Jewish character (Hist. 5.5), and in Philostratus' biography of Apollonius of

Tyana we hear Euphrates say EKELVOL [EV y&p TraXca 4eorTaoLV oi [6ovov TPwo[laov, UXX& Kc d

Trrowv T vOpGpTrwov ("For they [Jews] have long been in revolt not only against the Romans, but

against all men").35 Josephus was careful to note that this idea, that all Jews everywhere were

united in anti-Roman sentiment, belonged to the rebels alone, and it never materialized: TrEL6il

'IouGaio6 L [iv &Trrcv TO iTrrp Ei)4p&Trlv 6d6ul)XOv ouveTrrpO'CFEoeoca o LoV iVrrLocav ("these Jews

hoped that all their kinsmen beyond the Euphrates would join with them"),36 and in the

Antiquitates Judaicae he says TOv TreEuraETov KovrE Trpboc 'P[uLaioUc KaCTorIoav ("[the Jews]



32 BJ 1.6.
33 BJ1.6.
34 BJ 1.9.
35 5.33.
36 BJ 1.5.









unwillingly engaged this last [war] with the Romans").37 His sympathetic, almost forgiving

picture of Titus further suggests that Josephus was also hoping to temper Jewish attitudes toward

Rome.38 Such an apologetic approach fits well with what we know about Josephus' other

writings (discussed below) and with the conclusion drawn above about the intended audience of

the account. I will suggest below that there is another function of this account, but it is necessary

to discuss Josephus' other writings first.

The Antiquitates Judaicae

Concerning the Antiquitates Judaicae, Josephus claimed that he wrote for interested

persons in the Greek-speaking world: TaUcrlv 6' Ti~v E'veoT oav EYKEXELpLoCaL TrpayarTEiav

vopI(ov iTracoL axvetLoUa L TotL "EEXXTIrOL &&iav oTrou6fji ("I have taken this present work in

hand believing that it will appear worthy of attention to all the Greeks").39 In 16.8 he says

leXXouoLV aL T'L)V it[ETEPov TTrpOEWV Ud'vyp'cL TrO TrXEov eL Tuoik "EXrlXvaw L~EivL ("the

records of our deeds are intended to be mostly for the Greeks"), and at the end of that work he

says again X'yo) 6i OQapoa ca iM6rl 6tL Tiiv TGOv TrpoteO vrov ouvri eLtLV OT6L r6eti; v 'eTEpo(

Ti6uv-'Oir OEXA'-oca iT "r 'Iou56XLo( 4t'iT E XXOdiuXo( Triv Trpxy4xiEL'xv TaTUTr-v oT1 UwV ULKpLP63(; EL

"EXArvaX EeveyKEiV ("I indeed say boldly now at the completion of this task that no one else

could be so willing, neither among Jews or foreigners, to carry out this undertaking so accurately

for the Greeks").40

An examination of the introduction to the Antiquitates Judaicae reveals Josephus' purpose

for the work. The first thing the reader encounters is a different kind of statement of the motive

for writing the history from that found in the Bellum Judaicum. In that previous work there were


37 AJ 1.6.
38 Cf Mason, Josephus and the New Testament, 61.
39AJ 1.5.
40 AJ20.262.









several references to faulty accounts of the war with Rome, and Josephus said he wrote to correct

them. Here in the Antiquitates Judaicae, however, there are no explicit references to other works

that stand in need of correction. What Josephus emphasized instead for the Antiquitates Judaicae

is that he wrote to meet a public interest in Jewish history. He reports that others, including his

patron, Epaphroditus, also encouraged the work: 'oav 6E TLve o1' Tro6Go Tf(; i[oopia, iTr' aUrnv

tE TrpoU'pETrOV KUCL 4t x.LOTc 61 Tra Tov 'ETrrapdGLTro( ("There were some who, with desire for

our history, urged me upon it, and especially more than all, Epaphroditus").41 Besides this,

Josephus added' TL KUCKELVU Trp6o TotL; elpT[livot; XoyLtodtevoc 0o Tr(pEpyi)o TrEpi T TOJv

T14ieTEpov TrpoyOvov EL ET 6L6OVUcL TUJV ToLoUlOV ijOEXov KMIL TrEpi TJ;v 'EXX'Avov E'L TLVEt

amtuv yvcvaLt T& Trap' rt\iv EavoroG6aav ("and in addition to these reasons I was thinking not

cursorily about whether our ancestors wished to share these things and about whether some of

those among the Greeks were eager to know the things concerning us").42 In fact, Josephus

portrayed himself as responding to the same kind of interest in Jewish things and the general

Hellenistic love of knowledge43 that supposedly prompted the production of the Septuagint in the

third century BCE for Gentile readers, and drew a parallel between himself and the Antiquitates

Judaicae on the one hand, and Eleazar the priest and the Septuagint on the other hand.44




41 AJ 1.8. Epaphroditus is mentioned as the patron of the AJ, Vit., and Ap. His identity
cannot be correlated with certainty with others of the same name who are known to us from
antiquity. See H. Cotton and W. Eck, 'Josephus' Roman Audience: Josephus and the Roman
Elites', in J. Edmondson et al (eds.), Flavius Josephus andFlavian Rome (Oxford 2005) 49-52.
42 AJ 1.9.
43InAJ 1.12 he says Ev6OiLto ... T( paotCLXE 6e Tro oi0u 6oiLGX) iUTroXapetL KMaL V)V ELvaL
LXo[ao^OELt ("and I likewise thought ... to suppose that, there are many even now who, like the
king, are lovers of learning").
44 AJ 1.10-12. Josephus knew the so-called Letter ofAristeas, which purports to narrate
the circumstances behind the production of the Greek Torah in Alexandria in the time of Ptolemy
II. He gives his version of the story, closely following the Letter, in AJ 12:11-118. According to
the Letter, Eleazar was the name of the Jewish high priest whom Ptolemy contacted in order to









Josephus even suggested that his service to the Greek-speaking world in the Antiquitates

Judaicae was greater than that of the Septuagint, since the Septuagint produced under Eleazar

contained only the first five books of the Hebrew Bible, but his own account covered the entire

history of the Jews.45

All of this was certainly an ambitious picture given that Gentiles were, by all indications,

generally uninterested in the history or customs of the Jews. As Tcherikover noted, "the

translation of the Holy Scriptures into Greek made no impression whatsoever in the Greek world,

since in the whole of Greek literature there is no indication that the Greeks read the Bible before

the Christian period."46 We may therefore characterize Josephus' picture of a general public that

is hungry to learn of Judaism as a rhetorical touch designed to generate interest in his account. It

is the same kind of ambitious promotion of his work that was noticed above in the Bellum

Judaicum.47 However overstated this was, it is clear that Josephus wrote the Antiquitates




translate the Hebrew Scriptures into Greek. Since Josephus was himself a priest, the comparison
no doubt seemed natural.
45 AJ 1.12-13.
46 V. Tcherikover, 'Jewish Apocalyptic Literature Reconsidered,' Eos 48 (1956) 177. Cf
also J. Barclay, 'Apologetics in the Jewish Diaspora,' in J. Bartlett (ed.), Jews in the Hellenistic
Roman Cities (London 2002) 141.
47 The claim may be exaggerated but not wholly untrue. Some Gentiles in Rome were
interested in Judaism, for Tacitus mentions Jewish proselytes in Rome in Hist. 5.5. Philo and
Josephus both speak of proselytes with sufficient regularity to give the impression that they
could be found everywhere, and proselytism was the reason given for Jewish expulsions in Rome
in 139 BCE and 19 CE (D.C. 57.18.5a). Mason says that the evidence shows that "the only
reasonable hypothesis seems to be that gentile attraction and also full conversion to Judaism
were easily observable phenomena during Josephus' residency in Rome at the end of the first
century." S. Mason, "The Contra Apionem in Social and Literary Context: An Invitation to
Judean Philosophy," in L. Feldman and J. Levison (eds.), Josephus' Contra Apionem: Studies in
its Character and Cniieii\ ith a Latin Concordance to the Portion Missing in Greek (Leiden
1996) 193. It was one of the paradoxes of the ancient world that Judaism held an attraction for
some and a repulsion for others. J. Sevenster, The Roots ofPagan Anti-Semitism in Ancient
Times (NovTSup 41, Leiden 1975) 191-218; L. Feldman, Jew and Gentile in the Ancient World
(Princeton 1993) 288-382.









Judaicae for a general audience, mostly Gentile, whom he assumed, or at least hoped, would find

his account worth the reading.

Although Josephus did not explicitly say so in the Antiquitates Judaicae, a case can be

made that it was written to address then-current misconceptions about Judaism.48 His own

narrative comments throughout the work "suggest he is concerned to address a real threat to the

Jews: denigration of them as a people."49 Josephus composed the work in Rome where there

were significant anti-Jewish sentiments based on superstitious misconceptions about Judaism.

One example of such misconceptions may be found in the description of Tacitus (fl. c. 75-120

CE), who feared foreign influences in Rome and whose views must have reflected a segment of

popular opinion. He described Jewish customs in general as "sinister and disgusting" (sinistra,

foeda), he said that they harbor hatred and enmity toward all other people (adversus omnis alios

hostile odium), and that among themselves nothing was considered unlawful (inter se nihil

inlicitum). Because the Jews believed in an invisible God, Tacitus charged that they disdained

anyone who worshipped an image of a god made from perishable materials in human form

(profanos qui deum imagines mortalibus materiis in species hominum effingant), and for this

same reason they had no statues in their cities and refused to pay honor to their kings or to the

emperor (Igitur nulla simulacra urbibus suis, nedum templis sistunt, non regibus haec adulatio,

non Caesaribus honor)50 -a complaint Josephus also took up later in his Contra Apionem. F. F.

Bruce has suggested that Tacitus preferred to paint the Jews in the worst possible light because

"Tacitus simply shared a widespread prejudice, as did his younger contemporary Juvenal."51



48 1 will attempt to establish this context more thoroughly in a subsequent chapter.
49 J. McLaren, Turbulent Times?: Josephus and Scholarship on Judea in the First
Century CE (JSPseudSup 29, Sheffield 1998) 108.
50 Hist. 5.5.
51 'Tacitus on Jewish History', JSS 29 (1984) 33, 40.









Furthermore, the Jews had been expelled from Rome twice, once under Tiberius in 19 CE out of

fear of the foreign nature of Jewish religious rites,52 and later under Claudius in 49 CE for

rioting.53 Such moves on the part of the emperor surely must have fueled popular suspicion, if

not ill-will, towards the Jews in Rome.

That Josephus wrote to counter and correct such a negative public image of Judaism seems

apparent in light of his expressed aim to show, through the Antiquitates Judaicum, that Judaism

was all about a just God who rewards the faithful and punishes the disobedient. He says:

Tb ouvoXov 65 [4UXLOT' TLt &V EK Ta Srl. tx0oL ~fi [ToTopL'aX OEX AoaF acr'iv 6LEXOEtLV OTL
TotL; p v OEo0 yvoi)1 KaTUCKOXUOOUOBL KUCL T& Ka L0( votOETrlO9evTRx 4i1 TOtX14oL
TrCapapLaVELV TrTVTr Karopou0ca T rEpa TrLOTE'C( KCL yipac eUUL6aLtovLa TTpoKELTcL Trap& OEO6
KaO' ooov 6' &v C(TTOOTTOL Tr~| TOUTO6V (lKpLPOuf EiTrtLEXELc cta Tropa [Lv yLVETC'(L ~r TrOCpLLa'
TpiTrE'tra 6e el; out4)op&c &vKrlKeOOui 3 TL TroT' &v e & ya96bv 6pav oTrou6oG)otLV

("On the whole, whoever especially wishes to go through it would learn from this history
that for those who obey the purpose of God and do not dare to transgress the appropriately
ordained things, they succeed in all things beyond belief, and good fortune lies ahead as a
reward from God; but to whatever extent they withdraw from exact attention to these
things, the possible becomes impossible and whatever they are zealous to do as good turns
into incurable calamities").54

This portrait of the God of the Jews is then set in contrast to what can only be a reference to the

gods of the Greeks and Romans: oi ptev y&p XXoiL vo[o00tat ToiL [6uOoLt kE$aKOXOUvO'aUvTE TUV

dvOp(o)Trriv(v U&dxp[Trlt(o T)v EL( ToI0 OEoib TU; XA6yQ TiV cLoOXvrlv tieTUOEoav KC K TroXXiv

iUTroLtirloLV TOiL TTovTIpotL 'EOKCKV ("But other legislators, following myths, have in their account



52 Tac. Ann. 2.85; Suet. Tib. 36; D.C. 57.18.5a.
53 Suet. Cl. 25.4.
54 AJ 1.14. Josephus was not alone in this view among the ancient Jews. The same
approach to respect for divine institutions drives the history of 2 Maccabees. Cf especially 2
Mac 4:16-17: 6'v KUCL XptLv TrepEioX'v acVJroiU X~lXE.eTi TrepLOTrCOL KKCL Uv i(rouv Tm&e dayoya
KCL KaO' &TrUv ijOEXov E'OtoLoBO9eL TO6rTOUI TrOXELiOU KCL TL (oprIT&( 'ioXov doCepeLV y&p EL'
Toi) OELoui v6Otou) o0 p6tLOV &lXX& Tau6Ta 6 &KodlOUOOG KtLpbC 65iXWAoeL ("For this reason a
painful circumstance overcame them, and those whom they emulated wished to assimilate their
culture in every way became their enemies and punishers. For it is not a light matter to be
impious toward the divine laws-and the following period will make these things clear"). This
was the general view of the rabbis as well.









ascribed to the gods the shame of human sins and have given the wicked much excuse").5 By

such a portrait of God, set so starkly against the Hellenistic gods, Josephus would hope to show

that the Jews themselves were not the scoundrels they were commonly thought to be but were

actually the devoted people of a respectable and noble deity, a deity more upright than those of

the Gentiles. Given this picture of God, goodness consists first of all in piety toward God, which

can regularly be seen in Jewish praxis when it is understood correctly and divorced from

slanderous prejudice.56 If the Gentiles could see this, Jewish religious practices and customs

would then be viewed in an entirely different light. If pagans could see the true nature of the God

of the Jews, they would also see the true character of the Jews themselves. The means to

accomplish this understanding was a full-scale presentation of the history of Judaism,

highlighting the origin of its customs, its laws, its great figures, and above all, the nature of its

God.

The second major work of Josephus thus also, like the Bellum Judaicum, had an apologetic

purpose. In the Bellum Judaicum Josephus wrote to correct faulty accounts and impressions of

the war with Rome, but especially those that denigrated the Jews and himself. In the Antiquitates

Judaicae he wrote to correct misconceptions about the Jewish people that came as a result of

misinformation about Jewish origins, customs, and laws. What united both works was a common

concern to present a positive picture of the Jewish character to the world. It is important to note

that in the Antiquitates Judaicae Josephus shows no sign of distancing himself from the

particular view of God he has come to hold as a Jew (and more particularly, as a Pharisee). For

example, there is no attempt to identify the God of the Jews with a Hellenistic deity. He had no

intention of assimilating Jewish ways to others, but of explaining them. His refusal to


55 AJ 1.22. Cf Ap. 2.239.
56 AJ 3.49. EUoe PLa and its cognates appears 110 times in the AJ. Cf Ap. 2.171.









compromise on this essential point further refutes any idea that Josephus' personal situation led

him to compromise himself, his people, or his religion before the Romans.

The Antiquitates Judaicae gave Josephus a different kind of platform for his apologetic

concerns, and allowed him to present a much more comprehensive apologetic than was possible

through a vehicle like the Bellum Judaicum alone. Josephus thus wrote both a contemporary

history (the Bellum Judaicum) and a history of the distant past (the Antiquitates Judaicae), for

each could provide a unique way of demonstrating Jewish character, and together the

combination of literary topoi afforded him a larger canvas on which to paint his picture of the

Jewish people. In undertaking both kinds of accounts he actually anticipated his younger

contemporary Tacitus, who wrote both a history of recent times of war (the Histories) and later

an account of the formative period before his own day (the Annales).

The Vita and the Contra Apionem

The Vita was written primarily in response to charges from Justus of Tiberias, a rival who

had written an account of the First Jewish War (published perhaps in the early 90's CE,57 but

now lost) that was critical of Josephus and his conduct during the war. Because of the nature of

the accusations, the Vita concentrates on the period of Josephus' life, spanning about six months,

when he commanded Jewish rebel forces in Galilee. Justus' account was apparently designed to

discredit Josephus before his Roman patrons and before leading Jews in Palestine. Josephus does

not quote any direct accusations from his rival, but a mirror reading of the Vita suggests that he

was accused of actively promoting the revolt in Galilee, especially in the city of Tiberias, as a

kind of corrupt renegade who lacked both the support of the Jewish authorities in Jerusalem and


57 Based on Josephus' statement in Vit. 359 that Justus had delayed the publication of his
account until after the deaths of Vespasian, Titus, and the Jewish ethnarch Herod Agrippa II.
Agrippa either died or was deposed in 88/9 CE. See A. Kushner-Stein, 'The Coinage of Agrippa
II', Scripta Classica Israelica 21 (2002) 123-31.









popular support in Galilee, and of using his position as military leader for personal gain.58 The

target audience, therefore, of the Vita must have been a wide one, including the Roman imperial

household with its network of patrons and clients, Justus and his supporters, and Jews who may

have been exposed to stories of Josephus' treason and impiety.

The fact that this work was appended to the Antiquitates Judaicae is significant. What was

at stake in the slanders of Justus was not just Josephus' own reputation, but the credibility of the

accounts he wrote. For ancient historians, credibility was a matter of the historian's character.

Marincola speaks of

the importance in antiquity of character in rhetoric and real life: the highly stratified
societies of Greece and Rome cared a great deal about the status of the speaker. The proof
that things are as the historian says they are depended not a little on the audience's
perception of the narrator's character: to believe an historical account, it was necessary to
believe the historian himself59

For Romans, this consideration was more important than it was for Greeks.60 Josephus' self-

defense is therefore a defense of the history he wrote.

The Contra Apionem was Josephus' last literary work, published in two books perhaps

near the end of Domitian's reign. Its original title is uncertain. Eusebius refers to it as On the

Antiquity of the Jews,61 and Porphyry knew it as Against the Greeks.62 Jerome seems to have

been the one who gave it the title Contra Apionem.63 The treatise is generally a defense of the

antiquity of the Jewish people, but responds to many other charges against the Jews as well.

Authors of works on Egyptian history (Manetho, Chaeremon, and Lysimachus) who had


58 H. Attridge, "Josephus and His Works" in M. Stone (ed.), Jewish Writings of the
Second Temple Period (CRINT 2.2, Philadelphia 1984) 190; T. Rajak, "Justus of Tiberias," CQ
n.s. 23 (1973) 354-8; S. Cohen, Josephus in Galilee andRome 126.
59 J. Marincola, Authority and Tradition in Ancient Historiography (Cambridge 1997) 6.
60 Marincola 130.
61H.E. 3.9.4.
62 De abst. 4.11.
63 Adv. Iou. 2.14, where he quotes Porphyry and replaces Porphyry's title with this one.









transmitted outlandish stories about the Jewish people are mentioned, and answered, in the first

book. Manetho (fl. third century BCE) was a native Egyptian who wrote a history of Egypt in

Greek which has survived only in fragments quoted in other authors.64 Chaeremon of Alexandria

was a Stoic philosopher, a tutor of Nero, and also wrote a history of Egypt in Greek, again

known only in fragments.6 Lysimachus was a Greek grammarian and mythographer66 who

flourished some time after the second century BCE and wrote treatises on Jewish history and

laws.67 Apion was an Alexandrian rhetorician, literary critic, and outspoken detractor of the Jews

in the first century CE, who also wrote a history of Egypt. He attracted Josephus' ire by telling

the same kinds of stories about the origins of the Hebrews as the other authors he refutes, but

also by maligning the Jews as a low, rebellious people who refused to worship the same gods as

most others in the Hellenistic world. He also represented the Alexandrians before Caligula

against the Jews in the delegation that went to Rome over ethnic riots in that city in 38 CE. In the

Contra Apionem, then, Josephus was directly responding to leading sources of anti-Jewish

rhetoric and polemic, especially those who had maligned the Jews using historiography. The aim

of this work was therefore in keeping with the aims of both the Antiquitates Judaicae and the

Bellum Judaicum in that it shared a concern to present a positive picture of the Jewish people in



64 R. Laqueur, 'Manethon', in A. Pauly and G. Wissowa, et al (eds.), Paulys
Realencyclopadie der classischen Altertumswissenschaft: neue Bearbeitung (Stuttgart 1894-
1980) 1060-1106.
65 M. Frede, 'Chaeremon der Stoiker', inANRWII.36.3 (1989) 2067-103.
66 G. Damschen, 'Lysimachos [6]', in H. Cancik and H. Schneider (eds.), Der neue
Pauly. Enzykloptdie der Antike. Das klassische Altertum und seine Rezeptionsgeschichte, 7
(Stuttgart 2003) 608.
67 Josephus says 'ETrEL 6e KUCL 'ATroXX6UVLo0 6 M6OWov K(CL AUOi ( LXO KUL TLVE( XXoiL T&
tv 6TT' CyvoLiac T TrXE- tloTov 6e Kar& 6U5oiEVEtLaV TrEpL TE TOi vot.oQr aOav'oUO ti.ttV MowFO
KUCL Trepi Th)V v6O')V TTrTTOLrIVT(XL X6you OiT 6LKcaOUi Oi"TE (dXT)r9eL ... ("And since Apollonius
Molon and Lysimachus and some others, partly from ignorance and mostly from enmity, have
produced treatises which are neither fair nor true concerning both our lawgiver Moses and the
laws ..."). Ap. 2.145.









light of popular suspicions and to correct inaccurate elements in then-circulating reports about

the Jews. He addressed his work to TawicTX 6OOoL T&Xrl9Oe el6Eiva po6UovTra Trepi Tr T i ETEripac

px(cat6TrlTO ("all who wish to know the truth concerning our antiquity").68

How widely Josephus' works actually circulated in his day cannot be determined. In

antiquity books were mostly read by and circulated among a limited group within (local)

society.69 Authors normally wrote under patronage, and their works would have been most well-

known by the patron, the people within his social circle, and his other clients. However, Josephus

says that his account of the Jewish war had circulated among Romans who had participated in

the campaign and that he sold copies of the work to some fellow-Jews, including Julius

Archelaus and Herod Agrippa II.70 In the Antiquitates Judaicae he refers to the Bellum Judaicum

as if it were commonly available and as if his readers were acquainted with it.7 We may assume

that proselytes72 in Rome and elsewhere were interested in his works, and it has been suggested

that Tacitus and Suetonius used Josephus as their source for the idea that the Jewish Scriptures

predicted the rise of a great world leader from Judea.73 Given what is known about the

publication of books in antiquity, it is not unlikely that Josephus' works were first, and perhaps

mainly, read by those in literary circles in Rome. Yet we may certainly believe that any author





68 Ap. 1.3.
69 L. Reynolds and N Wilson, Scribes and Scholars (3rd edn, Oxford 1991) 19; S. Mason,
'Of Audience and Meaning: Reading Josephus' Bellum Judaicum in the Context of a Flavian
Audience', in J. Sievers and G. Lembi (eds.), Josephus and Jewish History in Flavian Rome and
Beyond (SupJSJ 104, Leiden 2005) 71-91.
70 Ap. 1.51.
71AJ1.4, 203; 13.72, 298; 18.11; cf Vit. 413.
72 As noted (n.47 above). Proselytism was apparently successful enough to warrant
imperial attention. Sevenster, The Roots ofPagan Anti-Semitism, 195-9.
73 Bruce 42. Tacitus mentions this in Hist. 5.13.4f, and Suetonius in Ves. 4.5. Josephus
describes the prophecy in BJ6.312f.









hoped that his work would eventually attain a much wider circulation, as Josephus' own words

have already shown.

This brief survey of Josephus' publications shows that, in contrast to the great amount of

Jewish literature that had been produced since the Maccabean revolt and into Josephus' time, his

Greek writings were not aimed exclusively at fellow-Jews. He does not engage in an "inside"

conversation, but in all his works he writes for a wider audience. In fact, none of his works in

Greek could be described as having been written primarily for fellow-Jews. They were instead

written with non-Jewish readers in mind first. Additionally, his works were written with the

purpose of informing the general public about the facts concerning the recent war with Rome, the

Jewish religion, and the general character of the Jewish people. His writings reveal that he was

perhaps the leading apologist for Judaism of his day. This dissertation is an inquiry into a

particular aspect of this larger purpose, and how Josephus went about accomplishing it.

A Brief History of Research

In order to describe the contribution of the present inquiry it is necessary to sketch briefly a

history of investigations into the writings of Josephus that have examined his purpose and

methods. Since Christians took interest in Josephus' works soon after their publication, Josephan

studies have a long history. Much of that history, however, involved the use of Josephus in anti-

Jewish theological polemics.74 This is sadly ironic, for as I have shown above, Josephus hoped

that his writings would present a positive picture of the Jews to his readers. Nevertheless the

Bellum Judaicum proved to be an irresistible proof text for Christians who wished to demonstrate

the superiority of Christianity over Judaism through the results of the First Jewish War. Having a

contemporary Jewish author declare that God was on the side of the Romans against the Jews in

74 See Mason, Josephus and the New Testament, 8-24; H. Schreckenberg, 'The Works of
Josephus and the Early Christian Church', in L. Feldman G. Hata (eds.), Josephus, Judaism, and
Christianity (Detroit 1987) 315-21.









that war was an admission that lent itself easily to pro-Christian politics and propaganda. It was

not until the modem era that Josephus began to be read seriously as an author in his own right.

Modem scholarship on Josephus went through a mostly negative phase in the late 1800s

and early 1900s, with an emphasis on source criticism that resulted in the view that Josephus'

own contribution to his works was minimal.75 The cue for this came from Josephus himself, who

mentioned that he used assistants in connection with writing the Bellum Judaicum: Tmor|C [oiL TT;

Trpxy[LXTELX( EV TTrUpaoKEUr yeyev'rLevrT1 XprToci4Ev6OU TLOL Trp6o tiv 'ErXX|v5(xa ()VTiv ouVEpyoiL

oiUTWr ETOLroctrv LV TTpeowV Tiv TT apl600Lv ("when all my materials were prepared, I made

use of some assistants for the Greek language, and thus I prepared the account of the events").76

He also admitted for the Antiquitates Judaicae that Xp6vou 6' Trpo'6vroV iTrep Lx~e To UL

[EycXUov ciTrTeGaOL 6L5vooUiEvoLL OKVO [OL KCUL EiXXTjrOL( EyivETO UTiTXLKUxTTIrV [LETEVEYKELV

6dOEeoLv el[; &XX0o6UTrrv t41v KCCL Evrv 6La EiKTou ouvAOELav ("as time went on, as it likes to

take hold of those who contemplate great things, there developed for me a hesitation and delay to

translate such a great purpose into a usage of language that is foreign and strange to us").77

Thackeray's studies emphasized the role he believed the literary assistants had,78 and many

scholars, following his lead, came to view Josephus merely as a redactor who relied heavily on

written sources and literary assistants instead of as an author in his own right. Scholars also

viewed Josephus with great suspicion personally for two main reasons: 1) it was generally

believed that Josephus' patronage by the imperial Flavian family stood at odds with his loyalties

to the Jews, and 2) the accounts in the Bellum Judaicum and Vita seem to give two different

pictures of Josephus' loyalties during the First Jewish War. Josephus was thus seen not only as a

75 Bilde calls this the "classic conception of Josephus." 'Main Trends in Modern Josephus
Research', Nordisk Judaistik. .\kA, Inlin, vi iii Jewish Studies 8 (1987) 74-6.
76 Ap. 1.50.
77 AJ 1.7.
78 Thackeray, Josephus: The Man and the Historian 100-24.









plunderer of other works, but also as an opportunist who manipulated his circumstances to his

favor without regard for personal integrity. Representatives of this view were Bentwich,79 von

Destinon,80 Holscher,81 Laqueur,82 and Foakes-Jackson.83 One of the products of this phase of

research was a high degree of skepticism concerning the historical reliability of Josephus' works

(since Josephus himself was viewed as a scoundrel), and vestiges of this view and its conclusions

remain in the works of some scholars of the present day.

There has been a shift in the direction of Josephan studies since the mid-1900s. Many

scholars today are more open to seeing Josephus as an independent author with creative skills of

his own. The way for this new direction was paved by the studies of scholars such as Druner,84

E. Stein,85 Richards,86 and Shutt,87 who argued for the linguistic and stylistic unity of Josephus'

writings. This perspective suggested that Josephus did much more than simply excavate material

from other sources. A notable contribution was Attridge's 1976 Harvard dissertation on the

Antiquitates Judaicae, which argued that Josephus was adding his own individual (and

theological) perspective to the forms and categories of Greek historiography that were current in




79 N. Bentwich, Josephus (Philadelphia 1914). "Josephus hardly merits a place on his
own account in a series of Jewish Worthies, since neither as a man of action nor as man of letters
did he deserve particularly well of his nation" (p.5).
so J. von Destinon, Die Quellen des Flavius Josephus in der Jidische Archaeologie, Buch
xii-xvii (Kiel 1882).
8G. Holscher, 'Josephus', in Pauly A. and G.Wissowa, et al (eds.), Paulys
Realencyclopadie der classischen Altertumswissenschaft: neue B,-arbleitulng. 9 (Stuttgart 1894-
1980) 1934-2000.
82 R. Laqueur, Der jidische Historiker Flavius Josephus. Ein biografischer Versuch auf
neuer Quellenkritischer Grundlage (Geissen 1920).
83 F. J. Foakes-Jackson, Josephus and the Jews (Grand Rapids 1977).
84 H. Druner, Untersuchungen fiber Josephus (Marburg 1896).
85 E. Stein, De Woordenkeuze in het Bellum Judaicum van Flavius Josephus (Amsterdam
1937).
86 G. Richards, 'The Composition of Josephus' "Antiquities"', CQ 33 (1939) 36-40.
87 R. Shutt, Studies in Josephus (London 1961).









his day so that the result was anything but a mere cutting-and-pasting of sources.88 The result of

this new approach is that Josephus is generally now given more credit as a skillful author who

shaped his sources for definite aims. Pessimism concerning Josephus' personal motives

continues in the work of S. Cohen,89 Schalit is severe in his judgment of him as a person in his

Encyclopedia Judaica article,90 and O'Neill has defended Thackeray's thesis that Josephus'

assistants (and later editors) played a major role in the composition of his works.91 Nevertheless,

several attempts have been made to see Josephus as operating with purer motives. Farmer

compared Josephus with Polybius and concluded that the pro-Roman elements of Josephus'

works were an outgrowth of his zeal to serve his own people.92 Braun read the Bellum Judaicum

as Josephus' own attempt to explain (like a theodicy) the destruction of Jerusalem and the

temple.93 Both scholars attributed to Josephus a nobler aim that absolved him of outright

duplicity. In a similar way, Rajak, Bilde, and Jossa have each proposed that Josephus' role in the

Jewish revolt in Galilee is not presented in two different ways in the Bellum Judaicum and Vita.

Instead, these scholars argue that the differences in the accounts are due to the different natures

and purposes of those works, and that together they present the same picture in principle.94 Such

views tend not to see Josephus as an unscrupulous manipulator of his circumstances. Bilde has


88 H. Attridge, The Interpretation of Biblical History in the Antiquitates Judaicae of
Flavius Josephus (Harvard Dissertations in Religion 7, Missoula 1976).
89 S. Cohen, Josephus in Gallee andRome.
90 A. Schalit, 'Josephus, Flavius', in Encyclopedia Judaica, 10 (Jerusalem 1972) 251-65.
91 J. O'Neill, 'Who Wrote What in Josephus' Contra Apionem?', in J. Kalms and F.
Siegert (eds.), Internationales Josephus-Kolloquium Brissel 1998 (Minster 1998) 270-77.
92 W. Farmer, Maccabees, Zealots, and Josephus: An Enquiry into Jewish Nationalism in
the Greco-Roman Period (New York 1956).
93 M. Braun, 'The Prophet Who Became a Historian', Listener 56 (1956) 53-7.
94 Rajak, Josephus: The Historian andHis Society, 183-222; see also her "Justus of
Tiberias," 351-4; P. Bilde, Flavius Josephus Between Jerusalem andRome (JSPseudSup 2;
Sheffield 1988) 176-82; G. Jossa, 'Josephus' Action in Galilee During the Jewish War', in F.
Parente and J. Sievers (eds.), Josephus and the History of the Greco-Roman Period: Essays in
Memory of Morton Smilh (Studia Post-Biblica 41, Leiden 1994) 265-78.









also concluded, after carefully examining Josephus' various statements about the causes of the

First Jewish War, that "Josephus cannot be reduced to an apologist for the Romans, or even the

Flavian dynasty. It is completely wrong then to see his main concern as primarily apologizing

and justifying his own dubious activities during the war."95 Moehring's portrait of Josephus in

his 1984 ANRW essay is also positive along the same lines.96 He attempts to break away from the

older pessimistic approach and to understand Josephus on his own premises. He sees the ancient

historian as being motivated by an issue with which Josephus wrestled personally, namely, a

desire to reconcile Jerusalem and Rome. The result is a view of the man and his works that does

not posit a fundamental contradiction at the foundation.

Two more things may be added to the observations of these scholars. First, the writings of

Josephus themselves do not support the view that Josephus's personal circumstances

compromised him personally or as a historian. As noted above, Josephus' writings show him to

be a staunch apologist for Judaism. If he was the Roman collaborator and lackey that he has so

often been made out to be,97 he surely would not have spent a good portion of his life trying to

present a positive picture of Jewish character to outsiders. We would expect him to have

abandoned his heritage and taken up literary themes that were more laudatory of the Romans.

Rather than see his situation as compromising his veracity, the texts themselves show that

Josephus used his situation to the advantage of his people. His position in Rome became a pulpit,

as it were, for the defense of Judaism. There is no personal compromise here.





95 P. Bilde, 'The Causes of the Jewish War According to Josephus', JSJ 10 (1979) 201.
96 H. Moehring, 'Joseph ben Matthia and Flavius Josephus: the Jewish Prophet and
Roman Historian', in ANRW II.21.2 (1984) 864-944.
97 Cf S. Cohen, Josephus in Galilee andRome, 86: "If any historian was a Flavian
lackey, it was Josephus."









Second, there is nothing inherently odd nor suspicious about a non-native speaker of Greek

seeking assistance with Greek composition. No one today would charge that an author writing in

a language not native to him was not the true author of what he wrote because he had editorial

assistance. Josephus' use of assistants in Greek composition should not, therefore, lead us to

assign a minimal role to Josephus himself in shaping the character of his publications. In fact, if

large tracts of Josephus' works were mostly the product of his presumably non-Jewish

assistants,98 it would be difficult to explain the thoroughly pro-Jewish, apologetic nature of those

works. Feldman has examined several of the stories in the Antiquitates Judaicae and has shown

they are often cast in a way to make them more amenable to Hellenistic audiences, by reshaping

the characters and their actions to conform to Hellenic models.99 None of this would be expected

from texts written largely by outsiders unless we are prepared to say that Josephus cared little

for, or was unable to control, the final character of the works bearing his name, or that the

assistants are in the end solely responsible, even quite apart from Josephus' own aims, for the

thoroughly Greek character of the accounts. Josephus tells us that he took pains to acquaint

himself with Greek language and literature.100 For an author living in Rome, this would have

been a personal necessity, not something delegated to subordinates. Attributing much of the





98 Thackeray was noted for having claimed to have detected the work of at least two
different assistants in the AJ. Josephus: The Man and the Historian, 100-24. He nowhere
ventures a guess about the ethnicity of these assistants, but what he attributes to them would be
most fitting only for Greek assistants.
99 See especially his Studies in Josephus' Rewritten Bible (SupJSJ 58, Atlanta 1998) and
Josephus'Interpretation of the Bible (Hellenistic Culture and Society 27, Berkeley 1998).
100AJ20.263: ... KUc (;Lv 'EXXTIVLK(;v 65 ypUct/[rov EoETroU5xoa tE TcoX^eLC V lUiv
yp lLtuK1iV Ei'TrELpLcUv dVLXAapcwv 5 Tv 6E TrEpi trTv Trpogop&cv UKpLPELUav rcrpLox E'Ko6)uoEV
ouvwlOELa ("... and I was eager to share in the writings and the scholarly experience of the
Greeks, although my ancestral usage hindered my acquiring precision concerning the
pronunciation").









character of Josephus' works to his assistants only creates more difficulties than it purports to

solve.

An important contribution to the question of Hellenistic Jewish literature was

Tcherikover's 1956 essay "Jewish Apologetic Literature Reconsidered," where he argued that

Jews, not pagans, were reading this literature, because pagans would not have been interested in

it in the first place.101 The result for Josephus studies was that an attempt was made to understand

his works in light of a Jewish audience. A few scholars have followed this lead, but it does not fit

Josephus' own statements about his target audience (noted above), nor does it explain why

Josephus was constantly explaining Jewish customs to his readers. Most modem scholarship has

concluded, instead, that Josephus was writing for non-Jews. What remains, however, is

Tcherikover's important question of why Josephus thought non-Jews would have been interested

in Jewish history and customs. The usual answer is that his works answered an implicit and

ongoing public debate over the value of Judaism. That is, Josephus' works were primarily

apologetic in character and purpose. Mason has noted, however, that this solution does not

answer all the questions. If, for example, the Antiquitates Judaicae is designed to refute slanders

about Jewish origins and customs, then why does that topic not take up more of the work? And

why would Josephus write an account that is only implicitly, but not explicitly, apologetic? And

what Gentile would have waded through 60,000 lines on the subject?102 Clearly, more research

can be done.

The modern positive view of Josephus has led to a more serious study of how Josephus

crafted his literary works. Several studies, in which the emphasis is on Josephus in his cultural


101 See n.46 above.
102 S. Mason, '"Should Any Wish to Enquire Further" (Ant. 1.25): The Aim and
Audience of Josephus' Judean Antiquities', in S. Mason (ed.), Understanding Josephus: Seven
Perspectives (JSPseudSup 32, Sheffield 1998) 68-72.









and literary context, have investigated his works in comparison with classical Greek literary

paradigms. Many scholars have demonstrated clear Thucydidean influences on the Bellum

Judaicum.103 Rajak argues that the Antiquitates Judaicae shares many common elements with

Livius, Diodorus Siculus, Manetho, Hecataeus of Abdera, and Berosus,104 and Eckstein has

demonstrated Josephus' conscious use of Polybius in the Bellum Judaicum.l05 In fact,

comparison of Josephus and earlier Greek historiographers has become a well-explored facet of

Josephan studies. Also, as noted above, Feldman has investigated the Hellenistic shape of many

of the Biblical stories in the Antiquitates Judaicae. As a result of such studies, recent scholarship

on Josephus is less concerned with attempting to reconstruct (and condemn) Josephus' personal

motives, or to discover the sources he used. Instead scholars are concerned with Josephus'

shaping of his materials according to the traditions of Greek historiography and the results this

shaping produced.

The interplay between Josephus' apologetic concerns and his shaping of his material was

explored in a 1981 dissertation at Rutgers University entitled "Apologetics in Josephus" by J.

Daniel. He argued that Josephus wrote the Antiquitates Judaicae with an eye on enhancing the

image of Jews and Judaism before the Greco-Roman culture at large, and this involved extensive

reshaping of the materials of the Biblical stories to the point that the resulting picture of the Jews

is hardly recognizable compared to the stories in the Hebrew Bible. Daniel also emphasized the

cultural situation in which Josephus wrote his works and claimed that intense anti-Jewish

sentiments in the Greco-Roman world motivated Josephus.





103 E.g., Mader, Stein, Thackeray, and Druner.
104 'Josephus and the "Archaeology" of the Jews', JJS 33 (1982) 465-77.
105 A. Eckstein, 'Josephus and Polybius: A Reconsideration', CA 9 (1990) 175-208.









Daniel's work is, in a way, typical of how scholars continue to view Josephus. While there

has been a shift in how Josephus himself has been viewed, investigations into Josephus'

extensive use of Greek literary topoi have produced their own skepticism about the historical

value of the end results, often suggesting that the models are more important for Josephus than

historical accuracy. As Rhodes has observed, however, just because an author employs a well-

known topos does not mean that he is somehow being insincere or untruthful.106 It is true that

anyone who would use Josephus as a source for the events in Palestine in the first century CE

must acknowledge that in Josephus we have a tightly woven and highly selective combination of

fact and interpretation.107 It is, after all, Josephus' version of the events. On the whole, however,

recent scholarly work on Josephus has a higher regard for the historical credibility of his writings

(or of scholarship's ability to get to the unbiased historical facts) than those of the early twentieth

century.108 Yet, as the survey of Josephus' work presented above has shown, modern scholarship

generally agrees that there is more than a simple reporting of facts going on in Josephus.

It has come to the attention of some modem scholars that Josephus' efforts to present the

Jews favorably to a Hellenistic audience can also be viewed as an exercise in self-definition. In

particular, Sterling's study, Historiography and Self-Definition, argues that Josephus was writing

in a genre he identified as apologetic historiography. He argues that this genre has roots going

back to the sixth century BCE and has these characteristics:

All of the authors [in this genre] were natives or "insiders" who related the story of their
own group in an effort to offer a self-definition of that group (function). The texts were
addressed to outsiders in some cases and to members of the same group in others. The
common element in all cases was the need that each author felt to relate his/her group to



106 P. J. Rhodes, 'In Defense of the Greek Historians', G&R 41 (1994) 157-8.
107 McLaren 179-218.
108 Some noted problems in Josephus' BJ are discussed in T. Ilan and J. Price, 'Seven
Onomastic Problems in Josephus' "Bellum Judaicum"', JQR 84 (1993) 189-208.









the larger world. The works are therefore apologetic, but may be either directly or
indirectly apologetic depending upon the primary audience.109

By "self-definition" Sterling meant:

... the attempt of an author to provide identity for the group to which the author belongs in
contrast to outside perceptions. It is not intended to convey the impression that the author's
proposal was normative for the group, but that the author offered it as a normative
understanding. In each instance, this definition represents a shift from previously held
views since the group in question is now seen as a subgroup within a larger body rather
than as an isolated unit. The phrase thus connotes an effort to shape as well as to
describe.110

Sterling's discovery of the genre of apologetic historiography is significant for the present

study. By the first century CE, Greek historiography already had a long association with

ethnography. The works of Hecataeus and Herodotus in particular devoted much of their space to

description of foreign people and their customs. Historiography easily became the venue by

which a people could be described or by which a people could describe themselves in relation to

others. That is, it became a vehicle for presenting, or constructing, an ethnic identity. That

construction could also have an apologetic purpose. Concerning apologetics, Kasher notes

"From the viewpoint of the literary genre and especially from the psychological viewpoint, the

use of apologetics may at times be interpreted as an expression of lack of confidence, the

manifestation of a position of weakness and inferiority relative to the rival, as if it were an

excuse with some regret or as if it were conciliatory in nature."111 Kasher also observes that

"there is usually a direct connection between apologetics and controversial personal or social

phenomena in certain circumstances of time and place, and ... apologetics is intended to defend



109 G. Sterling, Historiography and Self-Definition: Josephos, Luke-Acts, and Apologetic
Historiography (NTSupp 64, Leiden 1992) 17.
110 Sterling 17.
111 A. Kasher, 'Polemic and Apologetic Methods of Writing in Contra Apionem', in L.
Feldman and J. Levison (eds.), Josephus' Contra Apionem: Studies in Its Character and Context
i ith a Latin Concordance to the Portion Missing in Greek (Leiden 1996) 145.









persons or groups in respect of their actions or opinions and views."112 When apologetics are

undertaken on the group level, this collective apologetics has close connections with ethnical

discussions.

Sterling's study, and to a certain extent also Daniel's, anticipated a growing interest in the

subject of how peoples in ancient times viewed and portrayed themselves, particularly in literary

texts. Such studies draw upon the phenomenon of ethnicity. The study of ethnicity, or the way in

which people define themselves, is a modern one. However, scholars have begun to apply

questions about ethnicity to peoples in ancient times, and to read ancient texts with an eye to

discerning their ethnic components or ethnic information. Hall's book Ethnic Identity in Greek

Antiquity was first published in 1997,113 and has become regarded as a kind of benchmark in its

field. Other examples of such studies are R. Laurence's essay "Territory, Ethnonyms, and

Geography: The Construction of Identity in Roman Italy,"114 the volume edited by A. Bulloch,

E. Gruen, A. Long, and A. Stewart entitled Images and Ideologies: Self-Definition in the

Hellenistic World,115 and Ethnicity in Hellenistic Egypt, edited by P. Bilde, T. Engberg-Pedersen,

L. Hannestad, and J. Zahle.116

Study in the self-definition particularly of Jews in ancient times has been encouraged by

long-standing scholarly interests in the character of formative Judaism and the conditions

surrounding the rise of early Christianity. Josephus is an important source for both, and he also

fits Sterling's model of an author who wrote apologetic historiography. Also, as noted above,

Josephus has a foot in three worlds at the same time. The matters of ethnicity and self-definition


112 Kasher, 'Polemic and Apologetic Methods', 146.
113 J. Hall, Ethnic Identity in Greek Antiquity (Cambridge 1997).
114 In R. Laurence and J. Berry (eds.), Cultural Identity in the Roman Empire (London
1998) 95-110.
115 (Berkeley 1994).
116 (Aarhus 1992).









are a large part of the man and his circumstances, and several streams of modem scholarly

inquiry therefore converge in Josephus.

The Present Study and Its Contribution

It is common in the scholarship on Josephus for his writings to be described as an

apologetic retelling of traditional Jewish stories in order to make them more amenable to a Greek

audience. This retelling has often been viewed as a degrading of those stories,17 motivated by

missionary zeal.118 There are at least three problems, however, with this approach. First, such a

description of his writings assumes the perspective of an insider whose chief concerns were

primarily religious in nature, and further tends to assume a dichotomy between an imaginary and

monolithic "normative" Judaism and a corrupted, Hellenized form of it-assumptions that can

hardly stand.119 Josephus' literary portraits of the Jews looked like rewritings only if one knew

what the originals looked like (which his Gentiles readers did not), and it is questionable whether

we should assume that religious zeal was the primary concern of people like Josephus120 or that

anti-Jewish sentiments centered around Jewish religion. Second, it is not generally agreed that

Judaism was a missionary religion in Josephus' day, nor does writing in the mode of apologetics




117 E.g., J. Daniel, 'Apologetics in Josephus' (PhD Diss. Rutgers University, 1981) iii,
212-15; M. Hengel, Judaism andHellenism, trans. J. Bowden (Philadelphia 1981) 1.313.
118 A. Kraabel refers to this as the "old consensus," characterized by paganizing Jewish
religion to make it more attractive to Gentiles and by a longing for the ancestral homeland, and
viewed primarily as a religious endeavor. 'The Roman Diaspora: Six Questionable
Assumptions', in J. Overman and R. MacLennan (eds.), Diaspora Jews and Judaism: Essays in
Honor of and in Dialogue / i/h, A. Thomas Kraabel (Atlanta 1992) 5-6.
119 S. Jones, 'Identities in Practice: Towards and Archaeological Perspective on Jewish
Identity in Antiquity', in S. Jones and S. Pearce (eds.), Jewish Local Patriotism and Self-
Identification in the Graeco-Roman Period (JSPseudSup 31, Sheffield 1998) 29-30.
120 S. Cohen, 'Respect for Judaism by Gentiles According to Josephus', HTR 80 (1987)
423: "In his view Judaism is not a missionary religion." Some scholars, however, still defend the
idea that Josephus' aim was to win adherents to Judaism. Cf S. Mason, "The Contra Apionem in
Social and Literary Context', 208-16.









necessarily imply a missionary purpose.121 The question of how successful Judaism was in

winning converts in the first century CE is still open, and the lack of a definitive answer

precludes using it as a basis for suggesting that Josephus had a missionary purpose in his literary

works. Third, the word "apologetic" has been so stretched in scholarly usage that it is barely a

useful term any more.122

The known facts point in another direction. Two things in particular stand out. First, there

is more than defense of Jewish religious customs going on in Josephus. Although Josephus knew

how to defend his people from misconceptions and wild derogatory rumors, his writings also

went well beyond these kinds of apologetics. Gruen's observation about Jewish Hellenistic

literature is especially appropriate to the works of Josephus: "These works go beyond what is

conventionally termed apologetic writing. They do not represent mere defensive, rear-guard

action by a beleaguered minority in an alien world. What stands out is the aggressive

inventiveness of the stories."123 Second, Josephus' Greek writings were qualitatively different

from the majority of works produced by Jews from Maccabean times to his own day in that he

wrote about Jewish history and culture to inform non-Jewish readers. All of his literary works

had a non-Jewish target audience, but a Jewish subject-matter.

What might these facts tell us about the purposes of those works? Surely there is a

connection between the intended audience of Josephus' writings, the nature and subject of those

writings, and the context in which he wrote them. Any interpretation must take into consideration

that his writings were a response to what Josephus saw as the practical concerns of the situation,



121 Barclay, 'Apologetics in the Jewish Diaspora', 136, 147f.
122 Barclay, 'Apologetics in the Jewish Diaspora', 135.
123 E. Gruen, 'Fact and Fiction: Jewish Legends in a Hellenistic Context', in P. Cartledge
et al (eds.), Hellenistic Constructs: Essays in Culture, History, and Historiography (Hellenistic
Culture and Society 26, Berkeley 1997) 87.









namely the enormity of anti-Jewish sentiment in the Roman world. The Romans had drawn a

clear line between Hellenes (in which the Romans included themselves) and Jews, and Josephus

was trying to re-draw it. The recent war with Rome had exacerbated a long-standing negative

image of Jews in the ancient world, an image of Jews as rebels and, ultimately, losers. That

image needed repair, and the ideology that had fueled the rebels in the recent war with Rome,

and that had bred a perception of wide-spread Jewish animosity toward Rome, needed to be

repudiated and replaced.

To an outsider (to whom the texts were aimed), Josephus' writings were literary portraits

of Jewishness that were intended to be normative for understanding all Jews, and the nature of

these portraits is that they are not wholly, or even primarily, religious in character. The sum

effect of Josephus' writings, which always had non-Jews in view, was to shape a positive picture

of Jews not only religiously, but also historically and socially. Josephus was well-aware of the

sentiments of Gentiles towards Jews in his day. He knew that the rebels who had, in his view,

caused the war had promoted an image of Jewishness that led directly to violence,124 and he

aimed to replace that view with one that was more amenable to Roman tastes. He knew the

rumors and the popular unkind interpretations that had been placed on the behavior and customs

of his people, and he wrote to confront and to correct the untruths and misconceptions. He did

this not only by offering counter-facts, but also by crafting a new cultural portrait of Jews.

Furthermore, in constructing this new positive image he used the paradigms of the very people

who had created, received, and fostered the negative rumors and misconceptions. These



124 For this phenomenon, see J. Fearon and D. Laitin, 'Violence and the Social
Construction of Ethnic Identity', International Organization 54 (2000) 845-77. One may
compare this with the ethnic constructions behind the riot in Alexandria in 38 BC. See K.
Goudriaan, 'Ethnical Strategies in Graeco-Roman Egypt', in P. Bilde et al (eds.), Ethnicity in
Hellenistic Egypt (Studies in Hellenistic Civilization 3, Aarhus 1992) 79-95.









paradigms were often secular, not merely religious, in character, and by using them Josephus

demonstrated that he had more than Gentile religious sympathy in view. He had a larger, social

agenda.

Josephus' circumstances, and the content of his writings, suggest that his works were

designed to present a positive image of Jewish culture which served as a correction to the

prevailing, mostly negative image. The present investigation stands in the trajectories of recent

Josephan studies and of explorations into the ethnicities of ancient peoples and the texts that

reflect them. I propose that, given the historical context in which Josephus wrote, Josephus was

attempting a transformation in the way non-Jews viewed and understood Jews. That is, Josephus

was not simply accommodating Jewish history and customs to pagan points of view so they

could understand it or that they would be attracted to it. He was instead accommodating Jewish

ethnicity to Hellenism so that the Jews would be perceived as a people who possessed Greek

qualities. This was more than explaining the Jewish way of life to outsiders, and it was more than

simple apologetics. Josephus was re-inventing Jewish identity to conform with Greek identity.

The best way to describe this is that he was in the business of constructing an ethnicity for the

Jewish people of his day through his literary works.

The construction of an ethnicity is more than an exercise in self-defense125 (even though

ethnicities can be, and often are, constructed in response to some perceived social

marginalization), let alone religious self-defense. It is instead to make a claim in the world, to

make a statement about "who we are," to provide a rationale for fitting into a larger society. The

goal of the present study is to read and describe Josephus' literary works from the perspective of

ethnicity. I wish to view his writings not from the Jews' perspective simply as a retelling of



125 Cf E. Gruen, 'Cultural Fictions and Cultural Identity' TAPA 123 (1993) 13.









traditional stories, nor primarily as a religious undertaking with a missionary purpose, but as

carefully crafted products for Gentile readers whose aim was to broker a respectable social

position for Jews within Greco-Roman society at large in the first century. Specifically, I will

attempt to explore the writings of Josephus to discern the picture of Jewish self-definition and

ethnicity that emerges from them. This study will also, following the lead of modern Josephus

scholarship, look into how Josephus used Greek literary models to craft his works. The

combination of these two perspectives will construct the basic thesis of this dissertation, that

Josephus used these models to create a picture of Jewish ethnicity and self-definition that hoped

to present the Jews to the Greco-Roman world at large as having the best characteristics of the

noble Greeks of the past.

Josephus was not the only, nor first, Jew in ancient times to attempt to show that Jews

exhibited qualities that were essentially Greek in character. Philo of Alexandria (f/. first century

BCE) attempted to show the compatibility between the teachings of the Hebrew Scriptures and

those of Greek philosophy.126 Josephus' contribution lay in building a large-scale ethnicity

through the tool of historiography. It was not, in Josephus' view, only that Jewish theology could

compete with the best of pagan philosophy (the basic approach of Philo). Josephus wanted his

audience to see that the Jews also shared the Greek spirit in their experiences and in their great

historical figures, and historiography was the vehicle of choice for presenting these ideas. He

saw fertile opportunities in the rich diversity of Jewish history to demonstrate the essentially

Greek character of his people (the ethnic thrust of the Antiquitates Judaicae), he told the story of

their war with Rome in such a way that a reader would see Greek qualities in the Jews and their

experiences (the ethnic thrust of the Bellum Judaicum), and he demonstrated that the Jews and


126 P. Borgen, 'Philo of Alexandria', in M. Stone (ed.), Jewish Writings of the Second
Temple Period (CRINT 2.2, Philadelphia 1984) 233-82.









their religious beliefs are every bit as old as (and even older than) those of the Greeks, and

wholly compatible with them (the ethnic thrust of the Contra Apionem).

Josephus' foray into historiography must no doubt be seen as an ambitious move on his

part. Even if it was commonly expected for authors of accounts of wars to imitate Thucydides,

and to engage in mimesis of the tradition as a whole,127 to put oneself in such famous company

was surely always a bold step. Yet even here we may be witnessing another aspect of Josephus'

overall plan. It appears that Josephus hoped to present the Jews as possessing the respected

elements of the Greek cultural heritage, including a preeminent national historian: himself. He

presented himself, therefore, as the Jewish Thucydides (even to the point that, just like

Thucydides, he was criticized concerning his actions in the war), the Jewish Herodotus, the

Jewish Polybius, but also more: a Jewish prophet whose understandings were divinely guided.

Given the political and cultural climate in which he wrote, this must have been an audacious step

indeed. However, we can see Josephus' posturing of himself as the great historian of a people

whom he wanted to compare favorably to the Greeks as completing the broad picture he aimed to

present. Of course, it also served the function of presenting himself favorably to his patron and

the literary elite of Rome.

I will not argue that the construction of an ethnicity was the exclusive purpose of Josephus'

works. There is plenty of self-encomium and nationalistic propaganda in them as well. However,

reading Josephus's writings from the perspective of ethnicity reveals another important

dimension of them. To my knowledge, while it is well-known that Josephus presented the Jews

to his readers in Greek models, no study has yet interpreted this phenomenon in terms of


127 Marincola 12.









ethnicity.128 What I propose to do, then, is to use the insights of modem studies of ethnicity as a

way of interpreting the overall aim and purpose of Josephus' literary output. I hope to

demonstrate that this method can provide a satisfactory answer for the questions of what

Josephus was doing and why he was doing it. I do not presume that this approach explains

everything about Josephus' editorial activity, because it is probably not possible to argue that

Josephus followed a single rationale consistently.129 His works are complex materials generated

in a complex situation. I do hope to show, however, that approaching Josephus from the

perspective of ethnicity can provide a new perspective on his works.

The approach of this dissertation also shares the concern of recent scholarship to read

Josephus as seriously as possible in his own right and to locate Josephus firmly within the

Hellenistic cultural and literary milieu. It is within that milieu that we can expect to find not only

evidence of Josephus' method but also the reason that prompted the effort and the concern

Josephus addressed and hoped to answer, namely, the wide-scale social rejection of Jews in the

Greco-Roman world and the corresponding desire, at least among Jews like Josephus, to find a

legitimate, accepted place within that culture.















128 Rajak authored a short essay on 'Ethnic Identities in Josephus', but it is only a sketch
of how Josephus views the difference between Greeks and Jews. The Jewish Dialogue i/ il
Greece andRome (Boston 2002) 137-46.
129 S. Cohen, Josephus in Galilee and Rome 37.









CHAPTER 2
ETHNICITY, SELF-DEFINITION, AND THE ANCIENTS

The Concept of Ethnicity

The word "ethnicity" was coined in modern times,1 but the concept has a history going

back into ancient times. The English word is derived from the Greek word 'evo(, which

originally referred to a group of people (or even animals) who lived together, and then acquired

the sense of a group of people who comprise a nationality (i.e., they lived together as a nation),

whether it was stated positively (a group of people belonging to the same nation) or negatively (a

group of people not belonging to a particular nation under consideration). In this latter usage, T&

EOvrl came to mean "foreigners." Among Greeks, therefore, the term could mean "non-Greek."

Similarly, Jewish literature in Greek regularly refers to Gentiles as T& 'evrl. The word could also

be used in a narrower sense to denote the people who comprised smaller social units, and could

be applied to groups such as guilds, classes of people, the people in a geographical area such as

"the provincials," or the people under a particular ruler.2 The basic idea was of a group that

shared some common characteristics, especially some level of social life together. An EOvo( was

a geographical, political, or cultural group.3

Even though the phenomenon of ethnicity has become the object of modern scholarly

inquiry only relatively recently, approaches to this subject have changed over recent years as the

social and political climate in which modern scholars' work has changed. The result is that

debate persists over several issues in the study of ethnicity. It is beyond the scope of the present



1 In 1953, according to J. Hall 34. The term did not enter English dictionaries until 1972.
N. Glazier and D. Moynihan, Ethnicity: Theory and Experience (Cambridge, MA 1975) 1.
Ground-breaking discussions were E. Leach, Political Systems ofHighland Burma (London
1954) and F. Barth, Ethnic Groups and Boundaries (Boston 1969).
2 LSJ480.
3 C. Jones, '"Ovo( and y'vo( in Herodotus', CQ 46 (1996) 316.









study to attempt to formulate a new critical theory of ethnicity that is in dialogue with current

scholarly viewpoints or to attempt a new working model. I will instead attempt the more modest

task of taking a current, generally-accepted understanding of ethnicity and applying it to the

works of Flavius Josephus in the context of the world of the first century BCE.

The term "ethnicity" denotes a socio-political self-understanding. The subject of this self-

understanding may be an individual or a group of people. Although Weber despaired that the

term was so nebulous that it ought to be abandoned,4 most modern scholars are more optimistic,

and there is widespread agreement that the basis of an ethnic community is a shared belief in a

common descent. So Weber proposed that "We shall call 'ethnic groups' those human groups

that entertain a subjective belief in their common descent because of similarities of physical type

or custom or both, or because of memories of colonization or migration; ... it does not matter

whether or not an objective blood relationship exists ...."5 This is what others have called a

putative myth of shared descent.6 Ethnicity is not an objective category, but a subjective one. A

person lays claim to an ethnicity on the basis of what he or she believes, whether that claim is

grounded in (historical) fact or not. "Ethnicity is based on mythical beliefs about the

genealogical facts, not the genealogical facts themselves."7 The story of shared descent may

indeed have basis in historical fact or in blood relationships, but it need not have. Belief in this

story is chosen, not necessarily innate, and the basis for choosing to believe for oneself one story

of origins over another is complicated by many factors, not all of which are rational. "This belief

is of course never finished but always subject to reinterpretations and adjustments, depending on


4 M. Weber, Economy and Society: An Outline ofInterpretive Sociology (New York
1968) 385.
5 M. Weber 389.
6 Cf G. Bentley, 'Response to Yelvington', Comparative Studies in Society andHistory
33 (1991) 169.
7 A. Abizadeh, 'Ethnicity, Race, and a Possible Humanity', World Order 33 (2001) 25.









the present circumstances. In that sense, ethnicity is dynamic, changeable, and socially

constructed."8

This understanding of ethnicity means that a person or group may define themselves as

they choose. Since ethnicity is not purely a function of actual genealogy, but of the adoption of a

wider set of symbols, a person or group may construct their ethnicity more broadly than

nationalistic or genealogical lines alone would allow.9 Some people prefer to define themselves

more narrowly, as they may refer to themselves as African Americans, Irish Catholics, or French

Canadians. This was also common in the ancient world, as in the designation "Hellenistic Jews."

Ethnicity, then, has no fixed essence or boundaries that are somehow inherent to a particular

people. Instead the boundaries of ethnicity are mutable, subject to revision, adaptation, or

abandonment in favor of other ones. "... ethnicity is a bundle of shifting interactions rather than

a nuclear component of social organization. ... The primary characteristics of ethnic boundaries

is attitudinal. In their origins and in their most fundamental effects, ethnic boundary mechanisms

exist in the minds of people."10

The creation or adoption of an ethnicity is an act of self-definition. It allows a person or

minority group to situate themselves within the larger world and create a unique identity for

themselves. "Ethnic identity can be a fundamental element of self-understanding, rooted in

notions of loyalty and a sense of consistency across time and contexts."11 As noted above, Weber



8 M. Verkuyten, The Social Psychology of Ethnic Identity (New York 2005) 75.
9 Cf "Fewer Americans Call Themselves Multiracial" USA Today < http://www.usa
today.com/news/nation/2007-05-04-multiracialN.htm?csp=34 > 4 May 2007. Although the
article title suggests that it is reporting on racial identification, the fact that this phenomenon is
changing (based on comparison with earlier Census Bureau data) suggests that this is also a
matter of ethnicity.
10 U. Ostergird, "What is National and Ethnic Identity?," in P. Bilde et al (eds.), Ethnicity
in Hellenistic Egypt (Aarhus 1992) 36-7.
11 Verkuyten 78.









also included in his definition the idea that ethnicities are accompanied by a sense of sharing in

visible things like physical types or customs. His "or" reflects that there is more than one way

into a specific ethnicity. However, the inclusion of customs in the definition means that a person

who does not share physical characteristics associated with a particular ethnicity may still lay

claim to that ethnicity by belief in some kind of connection with the origins of those in the group,

and also by adopting the customs that have come to be associated with the ethnic group. In this

way ethnicities are negotiable. However, most sociologists today would probably agree that

Weber's inclusion of custom unnecessarily limits the concept of ethnicity, because customs are

themselves a negotiable element in the construction of an ethnicity.

Fundamental to the idea of an ethnicity, as reflected in Ostergird's words above, is the

drawing of a boundary that either demarcates "us" from "them" or that identifies "us" with

"them" (or that does both simultaneously). I will discuss below what factors serve to achieve that

demonstration. The fact that an ethnicity is a social construct that is chosen by a group or

individual means that the composition and maintenance of any ethnicity, that is, of the boundary,

is a task that confronts each successive generation. Every generation must decide what to do with

the ethnicity it has inherited, whether it be to change it, abandon it, or reaffirm it. Because people

chose an ethnicity, there is nothing about an ethnicity itself that is self-maintaining; ethnicities

must be maintained-boundary-lines must be determined-by the people who adopt them. The

decisions a group makes concerning the maintenance of its ethnicity are collectively called an

ethnical strategy.12

Since the myth of shared descent that lies at the heart of an ethnicity can be real or

mythical, ethnicity has been viewed either in a primordial way or in an instrumental way. The


12 Goudriaan 76.









primordial view sees ethnicity as "a basic and natural unit of history and humanity,"13 often with

a deterministic role in things. Those who view ethnicity in this way see it as a kind of force of

nature, almost biological. The instrumentalist view sees ethnicity as a tool that social groups use

for the pursuit or advancement of their political and economic agendas or interests. As such it

has a situational quality. That is, the primordialist view emphasizes the emotional attachment

generated from actual blood ties, while the instrumentalist view sees the adoption of an ethnicity

as a means to political or economic ends, leaving the truth of any claims to common origin as

another matter. Which approach is the better description of how ethnicity actually operates is a

matter of current debate.14 Given the phenomenon of ethnic malleability, the instrumentalist

approach seems to be able to mount the stronger case and is the predominant view among

modern sociologists. However, the two approaches need not be understood as exclusive of each

other, as most sociologists would also argue that ethnicity has roots in nationality. Smith has

therefore suggested that ethnicities are best described as having both historical and symbolic-

cultural attributes.15 That is, ethnicity and concepts of race or "nation" can be, and often are,

related, but they need not necessarily be.

There is a dialectic between the social and individual levels in the construction of ethnicity.

From the level of society, it is clear that sociocultural circumstances and structures are an

important part of the dynamics of ethnicity. People are affected by their social environment.

However, individuals are also strong forces in the matrix of factors that go together to forge an

ethnicity. When approached from this perspective, it is equally clear that "people are not passive



13 J. Hall 17.
14 See G. Bentley, 'Ethnicity and Practice', Comparative Studies in Society andHistory
29 (1987) 25-7.
15 A. Smith, Nationalldentity (Reno 1991) 20. Cf Verkuyten (88): "Primordial and
circumstantial approaches ... are complimentary rather than contradictory."









victims of circumstance. They are able to think about their situation, do something about it,

reflect, assert, react, and create."16 Forces from both levels must therefore be recognized.17

People function in, and in response to, specific socio-political contexts, but these same people

are also contributors to those contexts. The dynamic and negotiable nature of ethnicity and the

multi-dimensional character of ethnicity-building does not mean, however, that all elements in

the matrix of factors are capable of the same kind or level of manipulation. The role of individual

choice is, nonetheless, "important among ethnic minority groups with a more collectivist cultural

background."18

The way that individuals can posture themselves within society is limited by the more

stable nature of social institutions. "The continuous negotiation on the level of everyday

interactions does not imply a similar level of flexibility and variability on the level of society."19

In other words, change at the institutional and cultural level does not occur easily. It is, generally,

the nature of institutions to resist change. What this means is that there can be a real difference in

how an individual chooses to define himself, and how the society into which he hopes to fit

perceives his attempt. The social nature of ethnicity means that an ethnical strategy is practiced

within a dialogue with a society that is "other," and that "other" may not view an ethnic group

the way the group views itself. The differences between those two views can create tension.

These two factors-the dynamic, negotiable quality of ethnicities, and the resistance of

social institutions to change-have a bearing on the success of a given ethnic agenda. Together

they make ethnicities especially susceptible to falsification. Negotiation into an ethnicity, if it


16 Verkuyten 17.
17 See S. Jones, 'Discourses of Identity in the Interpretation of the Past', in P. Grave-
Brown, et al, (eds.), Cultural Identity andArchaeology: The Construction ofEuropean
Communities (London 1996) 67-8.
18 Verkuyten 25.
19 Verkuyten 25.









hopes to be accepted, requires some semblance of credibility. Verkuyten has observed that ethnic

constructions must not stray too far from reality if they are to serve as emotionally convincing

and satisfying self-definitions.20 One cannot invent, or attach oneself to, an ethnicity out of thin

air. As an exercise in historical reconstruction, an ethnicity must ostensibly be believable,

especially by the larger group into which an ethnic group seeks admission. Since the purposes of

constructing or attaching oneself to an ethnicity are to enjoy a sense of unique identity and to

provide a means by which others may view and understand oneself or the group, the ethnicity

has to maintain some kind of connection with the real world. Ultimately, the success of the

enterprise relies on the quality of the dialectic between the larger social level and the smaller

individual or minority group level. "Ethnic identities are not simply the products of ethnic

assignments imposed by others or assertions made by people themselves, but the result of the

interaction between the two."21

The drive to situate oneself (as an individual or a minority group) within the larger social

context involves psychological factors, especially the sense of self-esteem. Here Verkuyten notes

that "People prefer identifications that bring positive social identities, and thereby positive

collective self-esteem. ... Identification and self-esteem are assumed to be closely related, and

often they are not distinguished but taken as indicators for each another."22 Also relevant to this

study is his observation that "A sense of identity implies an awareness not only of who and what

one is, but also of the value, recognition, and respect that particular identities bring. Self-esteem




20 "Justification ... is necessary both for in-group members and for outsiders. Ethnic
claims have to be 'proven' if they are to become meaningful identities. Many things are possible
here, but not every possibility is intellectually plausible and morally acceptable. Although ethnic
identities are malleable, they are not complete fabrications." Verkuyten 75.
21 Verkuyten 18.
22 Verkuyten 67.









develops in interaction with others and is strongly dependent on the esteem granted socially."23

While these observations do not constitute absolute "rules" of how ethnic identities must, or

always, develop, they acknowledge the important fact that the need to feel accepted, to achieve a

sense of belonging, is a legitimate factor in the formation of an ethnic identity. Furthermore, the

degree to which one thinks ethnic identity is negotiable is directly related to one's current

position in the larger society. "... members of marginalized and minority groups are more likely

to hold a constructionist point of view in which empiricist claims are criticized and multiple

interpretations of reality are considered valid."24

Ethnicity is not the same thing as what we might loosely call nationalism25 or patriotism.

Nationalism is a sense of pride in one's perceived heritage, or "the attitude that the members of a

nation have when they care about their national identity."26 Nationalism often carries with it the

sense of promotion and defense of one's heritage in the face of some perceived crisis or threat,

whereas patriotism "denotes an identification with a loyalty towards a peculiar combination of

territory and nation."27 The two, are however, closely related. When these are driven by a

perceived threat, that threat may come from outsiders whose different values and lifestyles are

seen as a menace to the survival and the very existence of the group, or the perceived threat to

the heritage may come from within the group itself, from members who are judged to have

compromised key elements of the group's collective identity. It may even involve both, when


23 Verkuyten 68.
24 Verkuyten 28. Cf J. Hall 18.
25 I am not using the term in the same way some anthropologists use it, to describe an
attitude of which the goal is the formation of a political nation-state. I am using the term here
more in accordance with its popular usage.
26 'Nationalism', Stanford Encyclopedia ofPhilosophy. < http://plato.stanford.edu/
entries/nationalism/ > 23 May 2006.
27 S. Pearce and S. Jones, 'Introduction: Jewish Local Identities and Patriotism in the
Graeco-Roman Period', in L. Grabbe and J. Charlesworth (eds.), Jewish Local Patriotism and
Self-Identification in the Graeco-Roman Period (Sheffield 1998) 22.









some members of a group see other members as having compromised or identified with an

external threat. Since nationalism may be ignited by the perception of others within the same

ethnic group, nationalism is not ethnicity. This is not to say that nationalistic concerns are

unrelated to ethnic self-definitions. Indeed, they are.28 It is instead to say that nationalism should

be viewed as an element or catalyst in the formation of an ethnicity.29

A significant study of ethnicity among the ancient Greeks is Ethnic Identity in Greek

Antiquity by Jonathan Hall, who proposes that ethnicity is characterized chiefly by three things:

1) a putative myth of shared descent, 2) a dynamic, negotiable quality, and 3) expression through

written and spoken discourse.30 This description follows the basic understanding of ethnicity laid

out above, that what chiefly makes for ethnicity is the belief or the assertion shared by a group of

people that they have a common origin. The putative character of this basic element of ethnicity

makes it dynamic and negotiable. Also, like others, Hall posits that ethnicities are maintained

through a dialectic between the individual and a collectivity.31 What he adds to the discussion

here is that ethnicity can be negotiated through texts (oral or written) that create a narrative


28 "Specific social identities can also become overwhelming or unidimensional when the
society obliges people to place a particular identity in the forefront of their minds and central in
their behavior. A simple example is a nation at war when national identity forcibly takes
precedence to almost all other ones." Verkuyten 52.
29 Modern discussions of national identity are identical in many ways to discussions of
ethnicity, and some scholars have not differentiated clearly between the two. This is because
there seems to be general agreement that national identities are rooted in ethnicities. See A.
Smith, National Identity, 19-42. Similarly, B. Anderson referred to nations as "imagined
communities," yet the attributes of "nation" as he described them are much the same as the
attributes of ethnicity (Imagined Communities: Reflections on the Origin and Spread of
Nationalism (London 1983)). The same is true of M. Bruner's description of the formation of
national identity in Strategies ofRemembrance: The Rhetorical Dimensions ofNational Identity
Construction (Columbia 2002) 1-11. Nevertheless, ethnicity and nationhood are different
(although related) social constructs. The perspective of this dissertation is not that Josephus was
forging a national identity for Jews. They already had that. Instead, Josephus was forging a new
ethnic identity for Jews.
30 J. Hall 2.
31 J. Hall 29.









connection of shared origin, in the past, between people. Texts create and communicate a

narrative thought world that is interpretive of the myth of descent of the people who use and

transmit those texts. The creation of texts (whether they be deme membership lists, literary texts,

genealogies, etc.) is thus a significant moment in the creation of an ethnicity. Through these texts

elements of identity can be described, denied, or polarized in relation to competing or alternate

elements. However, while recognizing the role of texts in the construction of ethnicity, we

should not go to the extreme of reducing ethnicity solely or purely to a function of self-

definitional literary discourse. While an ethnicity may utilize texts, ethnicity is not a literary

construct. The realities are more complex and flexible than that, and self-definition is

accomplished in specific contexts that bring varied and unique collections of circumstances to

bear on the shape and outcome of the exercise and that affect how an ethnicity actually translates

into a mode of being. "Whilst ethnicity always involves active processes of performance and

interpretation in the objectification of cultural difference, it is still constituted in the context of

specific cultural practices and historical experiences which provide the basis for the perception

of similarity and difference."32

A fuller description of ethnicity is offered by Smith, who has suggested that there are six

characteristics of the ethnic group as opposed to other kinds of social groups: 1) a collective

name, 2) a common myth of descent, 3) a shared history, 4) a distinctive shared culture, 5) an

association with a specific territory, and 6) a sense of communal solidarity.33 This description

adds precision to those of Weber and Hall. Smith's description recognizes the importance of a

collective name for the ethnic group. Names have always been one of the most powerful means




32 Jones, "Discourses of Identity', 56.
33 A. Smith, The Ethnic Origins of Nations (New York 1987) 22-46.









of self-definition known to people, arguably more so among the ancients than among peoples in

modern times.

Smith's description also adds to the fundamental notion of a shared myth of origins the

important idea that an ethnicity includes a shared history that enjoys a traditional status among

those who subscribe to it. This is not contradictory to the fact that the putative myth is subject to

modification or revision, because traditions are themselves fluid things, and a shared history may

certainly change over time as it is transmitted and retold for new generations. However, even as

the story may take new nuances or shapes, the thing that survives is the ethnicity codified or

institutionalized in the story. This results in what Smith calls the paradox of ethnicity, viz., "its

mutability in persistence, and its persistence through change."34 Although the precise contours of

an ethnicity change over time, the ethnicity itself remains viable. Furthermore, it is easy to see

how this role of tradition works hand-in-hand with the presence of literary texts. As the texts are

preserved and transmitted, the ethnicity they portray comes to have a codified, or institutional,

quality that eventually becomes tradition.

Smith further suggests that an ethnic group will have a distinctive shared culture. This is

not, however, to equate ethnicity with culture. To say that ethnicity is the product of a perceived

or believed, and hence negotiable, putative myth of common descent is to say that ethnicity is

neither determined nor necessarily expressed by symbols of material culture. No ethnic group is

defined by markers (including cultural ones) that are objectively absolute, because ethnicity is a

social construct. Hall therefore distinguishes between ethnic criteria and ethnic indicia. The

former are those attributes that are chosen by the group as deterministic of membership within

the ethnic group. The latter are merely operational attributes "which people tend to associate



34 A. Smith, The Ethnic Origins of Nations 32.









with particular ethnic groups once the criteria have been established."35 These kinds of identifiers

can change over time and thus are not formally determinative of ethnicity. More importantly,

both the criteria and the indicia may vary from one group to the next. Thus, for example, a

specific religion may be a criteria for one ethnicity, but religion may serve only as an indicia in

another ethnicity. Or, use of a specific language may be a criteria for one ethnicity, but language

may not be crucial to the ethnicity of another person or group.36 The determinative factor is

whether or not something contributes to the creation and maintenance of the putative myth of

common descent that lies at the heart of the ethnicity.37 It is thus also context-sensitive.

The existence of a shared culture within an ethnicity is a product of the fact that ethnicity is

a subset of culture. Culture, like ethnicity, is an attempt at identification, but is conceptually

different38 and broader. There are usually various ethnicities within a culture. Friedman

delineates the two thusly: "If cultural identity is the generic concept, referring to the attribution

of a set of qualities to a given population, we can say that cultural identity that is experienced as

carried by the individual, in the blood, so to say, is what is commonly known as ethnicity."39

Ethnicity thus involves how an individual, or a group, appropriates the elements of their culture

into their own contexts. As Verkuyten describes it,

Acculturation as the process of becoming more similar culturally does not have to imply a
change of group membership and self-definition .... People often hold on to their ethnic
group identity, to what they feel is a continuity with the past, although their culture


35 J. Hall 21.
36 For example, J. Hall argues (168-81) that even among the ancient Greeks, dialectical
differences were not determinative of ethnic groups.
37 Verkuyten 75. It is for this reason that it is methodologically unsound to attempt to
determine the ethnicity of a people solely or primarily from the archaeological examination of
material cultural remains. See S. Jones, The Archaeology ofEthnicity: Constructing Identities in
the Past andPresent (New York 1997); idem, "Identities in Practice', 48.
38 S. Jones, 'Discourses of Identity', 67. She notes that the realization that ethnic groups
are self-defined "reveals a critical break between culture and ethnicity."
39 J. Friedman, Cultural Identity and Global Process (London 1994) 26.









becomes intermingled with that of others. Contact between ethnic groups almost always
leads to an exchange of cultural characteristics and mutual adjustments, but at the same
time it often results in enhanced ethnic consciousness and stronger group differentiation.
... Cultural content and ethnic identity are, to an important degree, functionally
independent.40

So a person or group may assimilate elements of a culture near to them, but these assimilated

elements do not essentially change a group's understanding of their own ethnicity. In fact, such

cultural elements are often redefined to attain a new and special meaning within a particular, new

ethnic context. It is in this sense, then, that an ethnicity will have a distinctive shared culture.

The last two of Smith's elements, association with a specific territory and a sense of

communal solidarity, prove to be flexible in practice. Concerning territory, it is entirely possible

for a person or group to maintain their ethnicity outside of their ancestral homeland and retain

only the most nominal connection with it. For example, it is commonplace among many native-

born U.S. citizens that they know where their ancestors came from outside of the U.S., but they

have never visited those ancestral homelands and have no personal ties to them. Yet they often

still proudly claim a heritage from outside U.S. territories. A group may even adopt a place as a

new homeland. The myth of Aeneas leaving Greek lands to establish a people in Latium

immediately comes to mind, as well as the fact that many people in Roman imperial times lived

in lands other than their ancestral homelands. There were several diasporas in antiquity, caused

by war, famine, and other such things. The Jewish diaspora was one of these. However, many of

these diasporas managed to adjust their understanding of their relation to an ancestral homeland

in such a way as to survive well outside of it. Smith's last element, communal solidarity, is a

difficult thing to define. It should not be surprising, therefore, if it proves to be quite variable in

its application. However, he states that one form in which this element of ethnicity is manifested

is in institutional philanthropic expression. The power of this element is that it may overcome

40 Verkuyten 77.









things such as territorial dislocation or internal factionalism or sectarianism. Community

solidarity provides a sense of togetherness which can override internal social stratifications or

ideological disputes.41

Organized religion can play a particularly powerful role within an ethnicity in that it is able

to reinforce an ethnicity in a unique way. Some would even go as far as to say that a shared

religion is a fundamental element of an ethnicity.42 Smith has identified three aspects of the

relationship between organized religion and ethnicity that make the combination especially

potent.43 First, religions often embody some kind of story of origins, often in close connection

with a creation story. These stories of origins are closely related to ethnicity's myth of common

descent, and serve to define that myth in cosmic terms so that the people who subscribe to the

ethnicity feel that they have a special place in the cosmos, leading to a sense of separation and

superiority. Second, religions regularly succumb to political and cultural agendas. Even those

religions which are in theory universalistic and teach a salvation that transcends ethnic, social, or

national boundaries regularly become associated, in time, with specific communities and

succumb to forces that forge new forms and contents for the religion, with the result that the

religion and the specific ethnic community become closely linked. Third, organized religion

often has a ready-made apparatus for the diffusion of ethnic myths and symbols. Typically this

apparatus consists of things like a priesthood and channels of communication (such as regular

assemblies of the social group) through which groups are regularly taught the symbols. In

addition, religious clergy (whether they are called such or not) serve to guard and codify sacred



41 A. Smith, The Ethnic Origins of Nations 30.
42 C. Renfrew, "Prehistory and the Identity of Europe," in P. Grave-Brown, et al (eds.),
Cultural Identity and Archaeology: The Construction ofEuropean Communities (London 1996)
130.
43 A. Smith, The Ethnic Origins of Nations 34-7.









texts and legal codes which reflect the self-understanding of the group. Religion becomes

especially important for diaspora communities: "Religion here plays a dual role, at once

conservative as with resident ethnic, and innovatively adaptive to meet a variety of changing

conditions while retaining its central promise."44

It must be understood that the description of ethnicity I have given above is a composite

construct. The model is descriptive, not prescriptive. Not all of the elements need to exist for a

people to have an ethnicity, nor must they formally recognize them in order for their ethnicity to

be genuine. All that is essential is some sense of "us" that is construed as being in some sense

different from "them." The sociological study of a people's ethnicity may therefore, for the sake

of description, impose categories on that people which they themselves do not actually use to

define themselves. It is in this sense that Renfrew says that "ethnicity is a matter of degree."45

However, the formal elements are useful as analytical tools if it is remembered that they are

theoretical, categorical descriptions that do not necessarily directly reflect how a people thinks or

speaks about themselves.

Whenever an ethnic group is confronted (by whatever means) with another, dominant

culture, a crisis in self-understanding often results. "A crisis of confidence often develops in a

less developed community when it comes into prolonged cultural contact with a more developed

power. Imperial expansion, for example, carries an almost magnetic attraction for the threatened

or conquered peoples in its path."46 In such a situation that weaker group has limited options for

maintaining its ethnicity.47 One option is to effectively ignore the dominant culture altogether



44 A. Smith, The Ethnic Origins of Nations 114.
45 Renfrew 130.
46 A. Smith, The Ethnic Origins of Nations 56.
47 J. Hall 31; cf G. Bohak, 'Ethnic Continuity in the Jewish Diaspora in Antiquity', in J.
Bartlett (ed.), Jews in the Hellenistic Roman Cities (London 2002) 180.









and reject things that would be considered ethnic dilution. There is more than one way to do this.

One method would be to continue to speak one's native language, or to continue to reckon time

by the calendar of one's homeland. Another method would be to create new dimensions of

comparison with the dominant group that enable the disadvantaged group to bypass its social

dislocation.48 If possible, a group may attempt to reacquire its traditional territory and

homeland,49 or it may try to reestablish itself by placing renewed emphasis on genealogical

legitimation.50 Such circumstances may even breed apocalypticism. The practical difficulties

involved in implementing such strategies often result in the failure to maintain this stance as a

permanent option. A second option is to assimilate culturally with the dominant group on the

largest scale possible. This entails a breach of the group's ethnic boundaries in order to adopt

new ones that are acceptable to the dominant culture, and often requires some kind of

management of a subjective or intellectual transcendence of nationality. The ancient Thracians

are an example of this. They flocked into Egypt in droves as mercenaries for Ptolemy II and

Ptolemy III and within a few generations had taken up Greek names, and typical Thracian names

(like Seuthes) eventually passed into the stock of common Greek names. They so fully

assimilated to Greek culture that they erased their own distinctive ethnicity. "In the end, there

was no cultural feature left by which they could (or, for that matter, would) distinguish

themselves from the Greeks. At that moment they vanished from history."51 The chief problem



48 J. Hall 31.
49 This was one of the goals of the Zealot party among the Jews. A. Smith, The Ethnic
Origins of Nations 57. We should remember that land-holding, especially in the Roman
provinces, was a form of economic power, although the land also had a religious significance for
ancient Jews.
50 A. Smith, The Ethnic Origins of Nations 50-3.
51 Goudriaan 79. Cf also S. Honigman, 'The Birth of a Diaspora: The Emergence of a
Jewish Self-Definition in Ptolemaic Egypt in the Light of Onomastics', in J. Cohen and E.
Frerichs (eds.), Diasporas in Antiquity (Brown Judaic Studies 288, Atlanta 1993) 102-4.









with pursuing this option is that it will, if pursued fully, result in the subversion and loss of one's

original identity by the complete absorption into the dominant group.

The third option is to attempt to establish some kind of dialectic in which one negotiates

some self-definitional elements that will be shared with the surrounding culture while keeping

other elements intact. In practical terms, this may entail living in a new place, in a different

culture, but retaining certain ethnic markers from one's homeland, making trips back to the

homeland,52 maintaining correspondence with others in the homeland, continuing to practice

traditional religion, becoming bilingual, etc. Some ethnic markers that are negatively perceived

in the dominant culture are thus remodeled or adapted and presented positively. In this option,

existing ethnic markers are conserved (but not in pristine condition). Depending on which

strategy the group adopts, identities may be obliterated, transformed, or revived. However, the

strong force of assimilation operative in the ancient world meant that groups that adopted the

first option probably began a process by which their descendants would eventually practice the

third.

For those who pursued the third option, especially for a prolonged period of time, the

phenomenon of ethnicity was further complicated when self-definition was practiced in the

context of an overarching imperialistic politico-commercial structure (such as the Roman

empire). In such a context

As the accumulation and possession of abstract wealth plays a central role in the definition
of social position, ascribed ethnic categories are not directly constitutive of the social order
.... Ethnic categories cannot function as categories of social structure in a system were
social position is not ethnically described, but economically and politically achieved. It is





52 There are several reports in the ancient literature of Jewish pilgrimages to Palestine in
Roman times. Cf. Philo, De Provid. 2.64; Euseb. PE 8.14.









in such circumstances that ethnicity or cultural identity becomes salient, insofar as it is
clearly separate from social position.53

Ethnic groups that lie outside of the political and economic mainstream therefore find that their

ethnicity, no matter how well-defined it is, is insufficient to purchase them a place within the

social structures where power is brokered. The ethnicity that perhaps once served as a powerful

marker of social status becomes relativized and marginalized within a larger, "foreign" system

where social position is determined otherwise. A people's sense of ethnicity may be a comfort to

them in other ways, but it certainly can be divorced from social status. Of course, this would be

more acute for those who were once considered elites within their own (previous) ethnic self-

understanding. Indeed, radical changes of status on many levels are possible in such a scenario,

and the rise of an apocalyptic mindset to interpret the changes of the present is sometimes not far

behind.54

Modem scholarship in post-colonial theory has explored the complex negotiation between

a group and the structure of power that has come to dominate it. When one culture dominates

another, the result is often a kind of hybrid situation which entails "the ambivalence of the new

cultural formation which results from cultural contact in conditions of unequal power."55 Both

the dominant culture and the dominated culture experience change in this process. The contours

of this change are not static, and thus many possibilities for confrontation, compromise,

assimilation, syncretism, or dialogue become possible all at once. Authors within the dominated

culture may "negotiate complex paths of self-expression through the adapted medium of the

53 J. Friedman, "Notes on Culture and Identity in Imperial Worlds," in P. Bilde et al
(eds.), Religion and Religious Practice in the Seleucid Kingdom (Studies in Hellenistic
Civilization 1, Aarhus 1990) 30.
54 J. Sorensen, 'Native Reactions to Foreign Rule and Culture in Religious Literature', in
P. Bilde et al (eds.), Ethnicity in Hellenistic Egypt (Studies in Hellenistic Civilization 3, Aarhus
1992) 164, 180.
55 J. Barclay, 'Josephan Rhetoric in Flavian Rome', in J. Edmondson et al (eds.), Flavius
Josephus and Flavian Rome (Clarendon 2005) 317.









dominant discourse"56 resulting in what some have called transculturation. The permeability and

mutability of ethnic boundaries thus becomes both a means of survival for an ethnic group and at

the same time a threat to its unique identity or even its existence. On the one hand, this

permeability makes it possible for one ethnic group (like the Jews) to assimilate and lay claim to

a status within a larger dominant culture (such as Hellenistic culture) and, in the process, to

change that culture to some degree. On the other hand, this same openness to culture carries with

it a certain dilution of the existing ethnic identity (which was a concern of some ancient

Romans). Too little assimilation keeps the group on the "outside," and too much assimilation can

make for the disappearance of the distinctive of the group altogether. Decisions about what

elements are to be retained as ethnic criteria and which ones may be reduced to the status of

ethnic indicia are often complex and hotly debated. This is to be expected, because a traditional

self-understanding is at stake. The situation is further complicated by the fact that language of

assimilation or acculturation may mask a subversive, revolutionary spirit.57

An ethnicity has political dimensions to the extent that it is a declaration of how a person

or group wishes to be perceived or treated by others with regard to social power. Ethnicity can

become a powerful motivator in political causes when an ethnic group believes its political rights

are being denied or suppressed so as to produce a situation of inequality or oppression, and

especially when the denial of those rights or privileges runs counter to elements of one's

ethnicity. To the extent that ethnicity can lay claim to a place or status within a larger culture, the

assertion of ethnicity can amount to a reaffirmation of political status. Sometimes the struggle

may be for political power without the element of inequality, and sometimes the goal may simply


56 Barclay, 'Josephan Rhetoric', 318.
57 N. Elliot, 'The "Patience of the Jews": Strategies of Resistance and Accommodation to
Imperial Cultures', in J. Anderson et al (eds.), Pauline Conversations in Context: Essays in
Honor of Calvin J. Roetzel (JSOTSup 221, London 2002) 32-41.









be equality, not superiority. The modern term for this phenomenon is "identity politics."

Verkuyten describes it this way:

Identity politics is about the recognition of one's status as rightfully belonging and the

public manifestation of modes of belonging. In addition, identity politics is about recognition by

others of who and what one is.... It is concerned with the emancipation from repressive, ignored,

or denied social identities, and with the equal value of groups and the equal respect to which they

are entitled. For many, this does not simply imply equal treatment but rather that specific

experiences, histories, cultures, and contributions of groups are publicly affirmed and

recognized.58

The following points summarize the features of the concept of ethnicity I have described:

* The term "ethnicity" denotes a socio-political self-understanding held either by individuals
or groups. The term is modern, but the concept is a historical phenomenon.

* The fundamental element of ethnic self-understanding is a putative myth of common
origin.

* Ethnicities are constructed and maintained in a dialectic, or matrix of relationships,
between the individual or minority group and the larger society. However, not all elements
in the matrix are equally malleable.

* As a social construct based on a putative myth, an ethnicity is negotiable, yet it must
maintain some semblance of credibility within a dialogue between insiders and outsiders.
This is a function of the dialectic in which an ethnicity works.

* Ethnicity is not the same thing as race, nationalism, or patriotism.

* Ethnic criteria are not static. Instead they are chosen because they support in some
significant way the putative myth of common origin.

* Cultural elements may be assimilated in the service of an ethnicity, but ethnic identity and
acculturation are separable.

* Ethnicity can be expressed through texts, which often impart an institutional and traditional
quality to the ethnicity.


58 P.69.









* Religion can be a powerful force in the maintenance of an ethnicity, especially for diaspora
communities.

* Ethnic groups are sometimes called upon to manage their self-understanding in the face of
a larger, dominant culture. They may manage this by ignoring the dominant culture, by
completely assimilating to it, or by attempting to negotiate some level of participation in it
while retaining elements or markers of their own distinctive self-definition.

* Ethnicity does not necessarily buy power within a social structure. In fact, it may buy
marginalization.

* The negotiable quality of ethnicity creates a situation in which the negotiation risks the
loss (through assimilation or otherwise) of elements that some may have considered as
ethnic criteria.

* One motive for constructing an ethnicity is the psychological need for self-esteem and a
sense of belonging. "Identity politics" is the politicizing of this psychological need.

Greek Ethnicity and the Roman World

Questions of ethnicity may be applied to ancient peoples, and have been so applied by

classical scholars for some time (although the sociological models and definitions of ethnicity

have changed throughout the history of classical scholarship on this subject). This becomes a

useful way to explore what people in ancient times thought of themselves, and may help explain

historical processes, events, and literature.

Ethnic self-understandings were just as flexible in the ancient world as they are in our

world today. Multiple ethnic designations were certainly possible in ancient Greco-Roman

society. Josephus spoke of one group of Jews saying *oav 6~ 'IouWaloL AlyUTrroL ("they were

Egyptian Jews").59 These Jews had survived in Egypt and had maintained a high degree of

separateness from the larger culture of which they were a subset, enough to still call themselves

Jews, but had also managed a degree of assimilation by which they could be called "Egyptian."

Bohak cites60 as other examples the 'EXXT1vooK6O0L (Greco-Scythians), the ALPULOLVLKOL (Libyan


59 BJ 1.190.
60 P.189.









Phoenicians),61 the EupoOL'VLKOL (Syro-Phoenicians),62 the Gallograeci (Phrygian Gauls,

Galatians),63 and the Celtiberi (Iberian Celts, in Hispania).64 Of special interest are the

OOLVLKcLyuTrTLOL (Phoenician Egyptians),65 the 'EXX1votE4L cLa (Greco-Memphites),66 and the

KapotE4(iL at (Carian Memphites), all of whom were neighbors of the Jews whom Josephus

designated as 'Iou6aiot A'yUirroL. All of these groups had been allocated land and had

permission to build temples for themselves. That is, Egypt became their new homeland, and this

important element of ethnic identity became transposed, as it were.67

In spite of the fact that some people managed to achieve a kind of dual-ethnicity, the norm

was that most people continued to be associated with a single ethnicity, whether that association

was hereditary or negotiated. Thus in Euripides' Phrixus, we hear of a (fictional) man who left

Sidon and settled in Thebes, and Fotvi TrEUKU5, EK 6' d&cEL ETcL yEvoc 'EXXrIVLK6v ("having

been Phoenician originally, he changed his genos to Greek"),68 and in Heliodorus' Aethiopica a

Tyrian character offers to exchange his cilinm and hispatris for another ('vo5 6e KaL Trarp~6a

tiv 6~terpav &XXdo'cLat) if it means he can marry the Egyptian girl with whom he has fallen in

love.69 Strabo's opinion in the early first century CE was that the Greek cities of the part of Italy

known to him as Magna Graecia (except Tarentum, Rhegium, and Naples) had become

completely barbarized (EKPEtPPappacooat) and thus lost their Greek character.70 In a similar vein,


61 The term is used by Polybius (e.g., 3.33.15), whose works were known by Josephus.
62 Used in the New Testament, Mark 7.26.
63 E.g., Tac. Ann. 15.6; Caes. Civ. 3.4; Liv. 38.12.1. The Greek version of the word
appears in D.S. 5.32.
64 E.g., Caes. Civ. 1.38.
65 PSI 5.53 1.1.
66 PSI 5.531.6.
67 Bohak 190.
68 Fr. 819.
69 5.19.
70 6.1.2.









Dionysius of Halicarnassus, a generation earlier, spoke unapprovingly of Greeks who had

forgotten their Greek heritage, ceased speaking the language, and no longer acknowledged the

ancient gods.71 To him, they were no longer Greek. In Ptolemaic Egypt, Jews took on the

designation "Macedonian" when they joined the military unit that was originally comprised of

ethnic Macedonians,72 a point which Josephus was eager to mention.73 Similarly, he mentions

the case of queen Helena: Karc& Tofov 6' 6vTV KcLpov iTv 'A6LTpr|vi4v pa3oLt; 'EEXvrli KCL 6

Trcimc a&Tfji 'IC(~rln EL rT& 'Iou6calov 'rl bv T 1V ov letripovX ("about this time Helena, queen of

the Adiabenenes, and her son Izates, changed their life to the custom of the Jews"),74 and KaL

"ilv 'EX ivrv OLtLoc 6d4' eCTpou TLVOb 'Iou6Gaou 6L6X6Oa-Lav EeL TOUc EKEKdLv)

eTCaKeKOp[o0a0L v6oiouc ("and Helena likewise was taught by another Jew and was brought over

to their laws"),75 IIu06t1evoc 6i TrTvu TOTL 'Iou6caov 'eeoLv Xa(peLV Tiv V riTpaE Tiv EauTou

eoTrEuoE KUL amoUT ELc EKElva Ut eTixeo9(L VOLLC(,)V TE 4il &v ELvaL pEPUpaLG 'IoU6cao( El 'iLr

TrepLTEivoLTo TrpTTELV Iv 'vTOL[Lo ("when he [Izates] learned that his own mother was quite

happy with the Jewish customs, he also changed to them, and thinking that he would not truly be

a Jew unless he was circumcised, he was ready to do it").76 A similar case appears in 3

Maccabees 1.3: Aooi'O Ap ou APydLtEvob TO YEvoc Iou6aioc borUpov 6' terapaUXOv r&

VO4Lta KCL Tv TrarpLowv 6oyTi t v dXTrrlXorTpLo~w vo ("Dositheos, the one called the son of

Drimulus, later changed his customs and estranged himself from the ordinances of his fathers").

The fact that ethnicities could be changed or adopted is also reflected in a statement

recorded in Arrian's Discourses ofEpictetus, concerning Jews:

71 1.89.4.
72 Tcherikover, CPJI.14; II nos. 142 and 143.
73 BJ2.487f; AJ 12.8. Ap. 2.35f.
74 AJ20.17.
75 AJ20.35.
76 AJ20.38.









TL oUVv CO)LK6V ,XEyEL oe(aurOV, TL Ea, TaTcLT TOki TiroXOUi, TL UTioKpivr 'Iou6(iov (c3v
"EXXriv; oui 6pac vuc, 'KEoLTO XAEyETca 'Iou)5do(, Trr;) h'vpoc, Trr;) ALyUlTrTLo; KCUi omv
TLVc E'Trqa4OTEpLCOVTx 'UL5odEV, ELjAU4EV AXEYELV OUK E'OTLV 'Iouc.Lo., /AXA' UiTOKpLVETcaL.
OTCV 5' xvaUXpiP T6 Tra'o0 T6 TOU PEpaUiEvoU KMIL TipTr1ivoU, TOTE KCL 'EOTL T6) OVTL KUL
KXEALT LL 'Iou( 0Lo(.

("Why, then, do you say you are a Stoic, why do you deceive the majority, why do you
play the part of a Jew although you are a Greek? Do you not see how each is called a Jew,
a Syrian, or an Egyptian? For whenever we see someone acting both ways, we customarily
say 'He is not a Jew, but he is only playing the part.' But whenever he takes up the pathos
of the of who has been immersed and joined it, then he is called by the name 'Jew'.")77

Four things stand out about this statement. First, it shows that adopting a different ethnicity for

oneself was common enough that it could be used as a real-life illustration of Epictetus' point

about the need for consistency between one's profession and one's practice. Interestingly, the

statement apparently reflects Jewish proselytism. Second, it shows that a person could present

himself before others in any way he chose. What makes a person an Egyptian is not his physical

parentage, but that he adopts and lives by Egyptian customs; so also for Syrians and Jews

respectively. Third, at the core of the matter, a person becomes a "Jew" when he consciously

adopts the mentality (TraOo) of a Jew. It is a conscious, deliberate choice to define oneself, and to

be known by others, in a particular way and according to an already-known ethnicity. Fourth,

simply imitating the ethnicity of another, while holding on to customs or practices normally

associated with a different ethnicity, or while thinking in a way incongruous with that imitation,

was considered disingenuous. Being Jewish and merely acting Greek (or vice versa) fooled no

one. To become a Jew is to take up the Jewish pathos, not merely to participate in external ethnic

indicia.





77 2.9.19-20. W. Oldfather ((trans.), Epictetus: The Discourses as Reported by Arrian, the
Manual, and Fragments, 1 (Loeb Classical Library, Cambridge, MA 1956) 272) notes that the
reading TI 6UTOKpLVI 'IouGaiov c3v "EEXXIrv; is an emendation, "for the MS. says 'the part of
Greeks when you are a Jew'." For the purposes of this study, the point is made either way.









Smith's six elements of ethnicity were noted above. By the first century, all of these

elements were in place for the group commonly called the "Greeks." 1) They had a group name,

"Greeks." 2) They believed in a common myth of descent, which extended back into the heroic

past. The fact that the Greeks themselves seem to have been mostly uninformed about the

historical particulars of their own national history much prior to the beginning of the first

millennium BCE does not diminish anything. As I noted above, it is the belief, not necessarily

the proof, of common descent that lies at the heart of an ethnicity. What matters was not that they

knew all the details of their common descent, but that they believed they had one and were

conscious of it. 3) They had a shared history that had been well-chronicled in its latter days

through literary historiographies. 4) Greek culture was distinctive, and well-known and well-

recognized into and through the Roman period. 5) The Greeks had a long association with a

particular geographical place, and it could be argued that they had created 6) a sense of

communal solidarity among themselves. While it might be a matter of debate as to the level and

success of this solidarity, this seems to be what Aristotle had in mind as he described Greek life

together: IIodIL tiev oiv OLKLd)V TrXr6 Od( OTL KUCL XOpci KCL KT~[rL4Tov aUumpKE Trpb6 TO eU

rCTV. (Exvepb6v 6E" (orav yap [i4 6UVwU5oI CoL To'TAOU O 'UYXyVELV, 56LVueTaL KI '. KOLVvia. 'ETL

5e EVEKC TOUTOUI) uvEPXOVrcL" O) 6o 'EVEKC 'EOTL KUCL yEyovE, KCUi ri OUOLC.a (UTOU UuyXU'VEL arU1TI

ouoa ("By a Nation we mean an assemblage of houses, lands, and property sufficient to enable

the inhabitants to lead a civilized life. This is proved by the fact that when such a life is no longer

possible for them, the tie itself which unites them is dissolved. Moreover, it is with such a life in

view that the association is originally formed; and the object for which a thing exists and has

come into being is in fact the very essence of that particular thing").78



78 Oec. 1.1.2. Armstrong's translation.









The existence of these six elements is not to say that there was anything like a standard

uniformity across the ancient world of how Greek ethnicity was perceived, experienced,

practiced, or described. What does seem fairly constant, however, is that the cultural aspect of

this ethnic identity was particularly strong. This was due in part to the great power of classical

Greek culture. Ironically, it was so pervasive that the concept of Greek identity became diluted.

This is reflected as early as c. 380 BCE in Isocrates, Panegyricus 50: Tb uT;v 'EXXT~w)v 6vo[a

TrETTrroirlKe tilKE4iTL TO) yEVOUi &WlXC Ter 6LCLVO'iac 6KKEtV ELVCUL, KCL t[L&Xov "EErlv(XJV KcLXEiLOcL

TOi) Tr TrL(aL6toCeo ) Tr T,'rETEpca r" TOi) Tr~ KOLVf( (jMuO)eGx lE't0rovTc( ("the name of the

Greeks seems to have been made no longer the name of the nation, but of the thought, and those

who share our learning are called 'Greek' rather than those who share a common nature"). Nor

am I suggesting that Smith's six elements are a precise description of the way the ancients

viewed and described themselves. Their categories were not completely the same as ours. For

example, Herodotus speaks of Tb 'EXX1VLKbV 6v o0i4aL4iV TE KCL 64LdyX(oooO KCL OE(0V

L6piXT, d TE KOLV& KCa BOuoiL (iiOE& TE 646tpoTra ("the kinship of Greeks in the same blood, and

the same language, and their common shrines of the gods, and customary sacrifices, and habits")

(8.144). I am instead saying that it is possible to see Smith's six elements among the ancient

Greeks. Furthermore, by the time of Josephus Greek ethnicity was mediated through widespread

Hellenism, and there were many variants of what could be called "Greek" as these elements of

ethnicity took on local colorings. However, it is clear that the semantic field of the word "Greek"

was sufficiently defined in antiquity, the term was readily understandable as denoting an

ethnicity, and it can be described in terms of these six elements.

As I noted above, ethnical strategies are often born in situations where an ethnicity is

confronted with a more powerful social reality that threatens it in some way. For example, the









causes of war often involve some element of ethnicity, but questions of ethnic self-understanding

are also prompted by other, and larger, phenomena. The rise of Hellenism in the ancient,

classical world was such a phenomenon. With the influx of Greek culture throughout the ancient

world, many peoples found themselves in need of reaffirming their unique identities, and much

of their literature in the Hellenistic period reflects a consciousness of the need for self-definition.

The growth and eventual domination of Roman power throughout the ancient world occasioned

another, and simultaneous, crisis for many peoples. By Roman times, although Hellenism was

arguably the most prominent feature of the larger socio-political situation, it was mediated

through the experience of Roman imperium. Long-standing political structures and hierarchies

were dismantled or relativized by Roman conquest. Groups needed to maintain some sense of

identity in the face of the new situation. As social structures changed, ethnicities needed

modification, revision, and renegotiation. In classical antiquity, this renegotiation of ethnic

identity was expedited partly because ancient culture was characterized by assimilation in almost

every aspect of life.

The power of the Greek cultural heritage, coupled with both a thorough-going assimilation

within society and the plastic, negotiable nature of ethnicity, enabled Greek culture and ethnicity

to survive in the Roman world. There was, however, a change in the notion of "Hellenic" as

Greek power weakened and Roman power grew. So, "...the Romans of the Republic and later

were usually content with the term Graecus to denote both ethnic Greeks and Hellenised peoples

of non-Greek origin."79 As I noted above, in the negotiation of an ethnicity within the context of

a dominant culture, both the dominant culture and the minority culture experience change. Greek

ethnicity was able to survive through means of an extensive and influential dialogue with Rome.



79 N. Petrocheilos, Roman Attitudes to the Greeks (Athens 1974) 18.









In that dialogue the Roman world was profoundly affected by Greek culture, but the definition of

Greek identity changed also. Furthermore, this change was imposed from without, by a new and

dominant culture. This resulted in wide-scale changes in how people were defined by others and

in how they defined themselves. This is not the place to enter into a discussion of how Romans

defined themselves vis-a-vis Greeks. The approach, as well as the answer, to that question is

complicated, but it remains that the Roman world of the first century was a world largely adapted

from Greek models.

This is not to say, however, that Greek culture was static over its history in ancient times.

The Hellenistic world had witnessed great political and cultural changes. As early as 405 BCE

Aristophanes (in The Frogs) was lamenting the end (in his opinion) of high Athenian culture

with the passing of Euripides and Sophocles, and the sense of Greek superiority generated in the

wake of the Persian wars was relativized by the conquests of Alexander III and their aftermath.

"From the point of view of the Greeks, or at least the majority of them, the rise of Macedonia

and the conquest of the East was not a victory of Hellenism over the barbarians; they could not

identify themselves with the Macedonians and their kings."80 As Polybius tried to point out to his

fellow-Greeks, there simply was no stopping Roman imperialism. By the time of Cicero, the

orator could speak of Athens as "weakened and virtually broken."81 Control of Greek affairs

moved from Greece to new Hellenistic centers of power (places like Pella, Alexandria, and

Antioch), and with the coming of Roman imperialism power shifted again to Rome. Yet in spite

of the political decline of Greece, Greek things were still highly respected in the Roman world,

and Greek ethnicity itself survived.



8o A. Giovannini, 'Greek Cities and Greek Commonwealth', in A. Bulloch et al (eds.),
Images and Ideologies: Self-definition in the Hellenistic World (Berkeley 1993) 265.
81 QFr. 1.1.28.









... despite these vicissitudes and misfortunes, the Greeks were able to preserve their
identity remarkably well. Even in the worst conditions, even as exiles or as slaves, they
preserved the awareness that they were the heirs to a great culture that was different from
all others. They were proud of their way of living and thinking. The humiliation of
economic and political decline was to a certain degree compensated for by the admiration
for Greek civilization. Hellenism was extraordinarily attractive, and the Greeks were
conscious of this attractiveness.82

Conscious, but also guarded. The Roman admiration for Greek culture did not run in the opposite

direction.

This feeling was not reciprocated. Some Greeks might admire the political wisdom of the
Romans and all were impressed by their military power, but they never ceased to regard
them culturally as barbarians. The Greeks were supremely satisfied with their own
language and literature, and, except for a few antiquarians like Plutarch, who were curious
about Roman history and institutions, felt no call to learn the barbarous Latin tongue or
read its uncouth and imitative literature. The result was that the Greeks had no impulse to
Romanize themselves, and the Roman government felt no mission to impose their
civilization on the East.83

The basic effect of Roman domination was to make the maintenance of an ethnicity outside

of its original context even more difficult. The dominant culture was always quick to remind

such people that they were outsiders. "...foreign immigrants could expect their host society ... to

note their peculiar appearances, customs and accents, and to remind them of their 'barbarian'

origins."84 With Greeks in the Roman world this difficulty was strongly mitigated by the fact that

their culture was the source of much that was now called Roman. Greeks thus had fewer reasons

to feel like outsiders. In fact, the Romans seem to have extended sympathy toward contemporary

Greeks out of a sense of Roman debt to Greek culture. "The former glories of Greece are seen as

still compensating for its reduced state, and ... the achievements and services of Athens in





82 Giovannini 267.
83 A. H. M. Jones, 'The Greeks Under the Roman Empire', Dumbarton Oaks Papers 17
(1963)4.
84 Bohak 178-9.









particular, and of the other old states in some degree, are held to justify, and indeed to demand,

specially considerate treatment of the contemporary Greek world."85

The Roman stance toward the Greeks, although mostly positive, was an uneasy one. As

noted earlier, ethnicity does not necessarily buy status, even if that ethnicity has managed to

pervade a large part of the larger society. The Greeks were a conquered people and received the

scorn normally accorded to those who were vanquished. The Latin verb pergraecor acquired a

contemptuous nuance ("self-indulgent"),86 as did the term Graeculus ("Grecian"),87 which was

accompanied by such adjectives as levis ("capricious"), loquax ("talkative"), insulsus ("boring,

stupid"), andfallax ("deceitful").88 Latin authors ascribed to Greeks the qualities of volubilitas

("too talkative"), ineptia ("immoderate behavior or speech"), arrogantia ("haughtiness"),

impudentia ("shamelessness"), levitas ("instability"), as well as deceit, luxury, and a lack of

manliness.89 None of this rhetoric, however, could hide what was obvious, and, in truth, only

sarcastically confessed it: that the Romans owed a tremendous debt to Greek culture in almost

every way. Cato the Censor (M. Porcius Cato; c. 243-149 BCE) was famously opposed to the

influx of Greek things in his day, fearing them as a corrupting influence.90 Gruen has argued,

however, that it would be a mistake to see in Cato's invectives some kind of wholesale

repudiation of Hellenic excellence. He was, after all, quite knowledgeable in all things Greek

himself. Instead, Cato was interested in asserting Roman superiority over Greek culture. "Cato's

knowledge of Greek and Greek culture, on the one hand, and his disparaging attitude, on the



85 Petrocheilos 67.
86 As in P1. Mos. 64. Cf J. Balsdon, Romans andAliens (Chapel Hill 1979) 38.
87 This word was used to express a variety of attitudes towards Greeks, "from the mildly
patronising to the openly contemptuous." Petrocheilos 53.
88 H. Hill, 'Dionysius of Halicarnassus and the Origins of Rome', JRS 51 (1961) 90.
89 Petrocheilos 35-48.
90 Plu. Cat. Ma.









other, were mutually reinforcing."91 By criticizing Greek achievements, the surpassing quality of

the Roman achievements in the same areas would become more apparent. That is, Cato objected

not to philhellenism in general, but to a philhellenism that suggested Roman inferiority.

Post-Cato rhetoric against Hellenism seems to have softened considerably. After the

second century BCE, "Romans tended to idolize not only Greece's past glory, but those Greeks

whose creation it was, as well,"92 and "the anti-Greek current in Republican Rome perished

virtually without a trace."93 Cicero was an admirer of Greek culture and styled himself a

philhellene.94 He expressed regret that Corinth had been destroyed (146 BCE),95 and he spoke

approvingly of Greek cities of his day as cultural centers96 as well as the cultural superiority of

Athens.97 This is no surprise, since Cicero himself received a Greek education. Guite has

surveyed Cicero's references to Greeks and has concluded, however, that Cicero's praise of

Greek things is also tempered by his patriotism.

He was fighting, as Scipio had fought, to give the Roman spirit a chance to declare itself in
letters as well as in life. It was the Greeks who had made him aware of what Roman
literature could be, it was they who had nourished its earliest growth; it was they who even
now furnished his mind, exercised his intelligence, and sharpened his pen. And yet it was
these same Greeks who by their terrible dominance were preventing Roman literature from
ever achieving its rightful stature.98

Here we see that a strong sense of Roman ethnicity continued to play a formative role in the face

of the power of Greek culture and dominated the dialogue, just as it had in Cato the Censor's

criticisms of Greek culture. As much as Cicero was indebted to Greek culture, he envisioned the

day in which Romans would know an even better culture built on its foundations. Until that day

91 E. Gruen, Culture and Identity in Republican Rome (Ithaca 1992) 74.
92 A. Henrichs, 'Graecia Capta: Roman Views of Greek Culture', HSCP 97 (1995) 244.
93 Henrichs 246.
94 Att. 1.15.1.
95 Off 1.35.
96 QFr. 1.1.27-8.
97 Flac. 62.
98 H. Guite, 'Cicero's Attitude to the Greeks', GR 9 (1962) 157.









dawned, Cicero seems to have harbored a kind of love-hate relationship with Greek culture. The

often-quoted line about literature by Horace, Graecia captaferum victorem cepit et artis intulit

agresti Latio ("captured Greece seized her fierce conqueror and brought the arts into uncivilized

Latium"), latently admits an inferiority to Greek things, an attitude that apparently was both

widespread and humiliating at the same time.99 Vergil, a contemporary of Horace, also paid

hesitating homage to Greek culture in Aeneid 6.847-53:

Excudent alii spirantia mollius aera
(credo equidem), vivos ducent de marmore vultus,
orabunt causa melius, caelique meatus
describent radio et surgentia sidera dicent:
tu regere imperio populos, Romane, memento
(hae tibi erunt artes), pacisque imponere morem,
parcere subiectis et debellare superbos

("Others will fashion more softly-breathing bronzes
(I truly believe), and will bring out fresh faces from marble,
they will plead their cases better, and the movement of the heavens
they will trace with a rod and designate the rising stars:
you, Roman, remember to rule peoples with supreme power
(these will be your arts), and to establish the order of peace,
to spare those who have been subjected and to subdue the arrogant").100

Again, the Greek heritage is summoned only to become the foil for Roman excellence. While the

Greeks had excelled in artistic achievements, they did not achieve anything like the Roman

empire with its impressive display of political power. In the comparison, Rome wins.

Rome's debt to Greece was undeniable, and yet the Romans despised the implication that

Greece was therefore the greater culture, and they detested certain qualities among the Greeks.




99 The statement appears in Ep. 2.1.156-7. Hill (92) refers to the sentiment of these words
as "the conventional theory" in its day. Saunders suggests that Horace was echoing the words of
Cato ('The Nature of Rome's Early Appraisal of Greek Culture', CP 39 (1944) 209). Cf Liv.
34.4.3.
100 However, the Aeneid still reflects a good amount of tension between Greece and
Rome. See Hill 90-2.









This tension was managed in three ways.101 One strategy was to claim that Greeks throughout the

ages possessed both good qualities and bad ones.102 Another strategy made a distinction between

the Greeks of the past and the Greeks of the present, the former being noble, the latter being

contemptible.103 Yet another way around the tension was to distinguish between good ones and

bad ones among contemporary Greeks.104 It could be argued that the second of these approaches

was the most common. By Roman imperial times, Greek things, especially from the golden age

of Athens, were considered, in many ways, to represent an ideal. This was especially apparent in

the influence Greek culture had on Roman art, architecture, and literature. Many of the temples

in Rome were built using Greek craftsmen and after archaic Greek models, Roman villas were

built in Greek style,105 and Greek works of art had flooded Italy since the second century BCE.106

With the coming of the Augustan age and the flowering of a truly national literature, there was

little, if any, doubt that Roman culture, and thus an increasing sense of Roman ethnicity which

was different from that of the Greeks, had come into its own. Yet even in that time many of

Rome's best literati still looked back to Greek culture with a sense of debt, as evidenced by the

lines from Horace and Vergil quoted above. And there were other, more general, indicators that

Greek culture and ethnicity survived well under Roman domination. In imperial times literature

continued to be written in Greek, even literature designed for the eyes of Roman elites who daily

conversed in Latin, and within the Greek language itself there was an Atticizing movement

which attempted to mimic the style and rhetoric of classical Athens. Josephus wrote in the time

of the Second Sophistic, a kind of renaissance of Greek culture. What is important here is that


101 Balsdon 38-40.
102 Cic. Flac., 9.
103 Cf Cic., De Orat. 3.197; D.Chr., Or. 31.157-60.
104 Cic. Ver., 2.2.7.
105 P. Zanker, The Power oflmages in the Age ofAugustus (Ann Arbor 1990) 25-31.
106 E. Gruen, The Hellenistic World and the Coming ofRome (Berkeley 1984) 259.









there was among some a distinction to be drawn between contemporary Greeks and Greeks of

the past. The ideal lay with the latter, not the former.107 Furthermore, Romans spoke well of

Greek culture because they saw themselves as standing on the shoulders of that culture, as it

were, and having surpassed it. "A widespread consensus held that command of Greek learning

was not only respectable but fundamental in projecting Rome's own cultural ascendancy."108

Greek ethnicity was thus able to survive the Roman crisis in large part because the Romans

themselves had a use for it, even if ultimately to claim superiority to it.

Hellenistic authors, presumably driven by the wants and needs of their audiences, found

legitimation in establishing connections between themselves and the mythic, heroic Greek past.

That is, ethnicities were reinvented by appeal to the epic age. "... in the competitive atmosphere

of the Hellenistic world, a claim to heroic associations became one ritual means by which to

articulate local histories and local strengths to outside authorities."109 This is another way of

speaking of re-casting an ethnicity in a Greek mold. Alcock goes on to speak of

...the yearning on the part of Hellenistic communities for a history, either real or
"invented." ... Stress was laid upon recovering and celebrating origin myths and legends,
on establishing pedigrees running back into the mists of time. In part, this self-
consciousness appears a product of the threat to the independent life of small cities, a threat
rooted in Hellenistic times which grew apace under the Roman empire. The right to
privilege, the very right to existence, increasingly had to be demanded upon historic
grounds. ... Ancestries and origins, invoked through myth and ritual, could be used to
claim kinship with other cities, to establish status, and to secure identity.110

Historians such as Polybius, a native Greek who lived in Rome for several years and

tutored Scipio, no doubt did much to foster and feed philhellenism in Rome,111 as did Augustus'


107 Petrocheilos 63-7.
108 Gruen, Culture and National Identity 270.
109 S. Alcock, 'The Heroic Past in a Hellenistic Present', in P. Cartledge et al (eds.),
Hellenistic Constructs: Essays in Culture, History, and Historiography (Hellenistic Culture and
Society 26, Berkeley 1997) 33.
110 Alcock 33.
111 See Saunders 212-3.









decision to adopt a Greek mythological progenitor for the subject of the national epic.112 By the

turn of the first century CE, the mood of uneasy recognition of Greek culture seems to have

shifted sufficiently that Dionysus of Halicarnassus could contrive a Greek origin for the Romans

and proclaim that Rome should rightly be called a Greek city.113 He also produced explanations

of the Greek origins of clientship and the Senate, he found Greek elements in various features of

Roman religion, and he had several characters who are either portrayed as aware of the Greek

political models or as consciously imitating famous Greeks.114 Hill has suggested that Dionysius

was consciously opposing the anti-Hellenic undercurrent of sentiment in his day.115 Even if that

assessment goes to far, Dionysius still stands as a confession (even if it is overdone) of the

enduring power of Greek culture in his day.

It was also noted above, from Hall, that among the ancients, ethnicity was expressed in

texts. Historiography after the Greek model was, by Josephus' time, a nearly-ideal vehicle for the

expression or construction of an ethnicity, since it was capable of dealing with the subjects of

origins as well as portraying the defining characteristics of a people as revealed through their

words, actions, and customs. Greek historiography developed initially from the epic tradition,

and the power of the Iliad and the Odyssey as a definition of Greek identity was and is well

known. Both of those works communicated a strong sense of ouYyyEveL (in spite of the personal

disagreements between major characters) and strong ties to the homeland. Greek historiography

acquired an interest in geography and the cultures of other lands from the influence of Hecataeus

of Miletus and his nIpLpyiFroL; FIle, a work that combined a survey of geography with

ethnography. It was left for Herodotus to take the next step and turn ethnography into history.

112 Hill 90, 92.
113 1.89.1.
114 Hill 89.
115 Hill 92-3.









"Ethnography was subsequently either subsumed under the banner of history or became more

historically oriented."116 Greek historiography became a medium by which the cultures of others

served to highlight what was essentially Greek by way of contrast and comparison. Even as the

Mediterranean world fell under Roman rule, the Roman admiration for Greek things meant that

historiography in the Greek vein continued to be written-witness Polybius and Dionysius of

Halicamassus, and in a different genre, the Aeneid of Vergil. In these writers we see that Greek

culture was still the latent benchmark of comparison, even when the subject was the history of

Rome. Although Greek culture was now the foil for Roman culture, the shape of the expression

was still Greek.

My discussion of Greek ethnicity has, so far, drawn from sources in the world around

Josephus. But what did Josephus himself mean when he said that something, or some one, was

"Greek"? What was his concept of Greek ethnicity? This has a significant bearing on what

Josephus thought he was doing and how he tried to do it. As it turns, out, Josephus does not seem

to have had a clearly-defined idea of Greek identity. Nowhere did he discuss the matter

explicitly, and often "Greek" in Josephus simply means "non-Jewish." In the Bellum Judaicum,

the term regularly appears as part of an "us" versus "them" dichotomy in which those who are

not "us" (Jewish) are often (but not always) hostile to Jews.117 Herein lies a significant clue to

Josephus' literary aims. His use of the word "Greek" to denote what is non-Jewish (often with

hostility) betrays his view of the world in which he lived, a world in which Jews were "other,"

not part of mainstream society. He operated on the basis of a perceived wide-scale social

rejection of his people and he wrote to get them "inside." As I have shown above, this is typical

of scenarios in which ethnicities are created. Josephus fits the model well. At any rate, Josephus'


116 Sterling 52.
117 Rajak, The Jewish Dialogue, 139, 142.









failure to lay down explicit criteria for what he means by the word "Greek" can be interpreted to

mean that he operated on the idea of Greek identity that was common in his day. No explication

was needed, because everyone knew what it was. If this assumption is correct, then we are

justified in understanding Greek identity in the way I have outlined above, as drawn from the

ancient sources.

Rajak has also noted that Josephus sometimes distinguishes between Syrians and Greeks.

In Palestine this distinction would not have been easy to maintain, especially if "Syrian" simply

reflects the Roman provincial designation of the area in which these people lived. Surely they

were thoroughly Greek in their culture, so the difference between Greeks and Syrians is

puzzling. Rajak has suggested, tentatively, that "Greek" refers to people who were citizens of

Greek-style cities, presumably with their own constitutions, and "Syrian" refers to those who

lived in towns or villages, but whose culture was Greek also.118 The suggestion is viable. If it is

correct, it provides an important clue about what Josephus thinks a Greek is: he is one who is a

recognized part of an established Greek city.

At least one thing does seem clear: Josephus operates on the basis of a cultural idea of

Greek identity. "... at the time of writing the Jewish War, Josephus was on the way to forming a

conception of a Greek culture as something distinct from the people who were contemporary

Greeks, or would-be Greeks."119 Framing the matter in this way is what would allow Josephus an

opportunity to attempt to negotiate a way in for the Jews. If Greek identity was a matter of

culture, Josephus could argue that Jews are Greek in this way, even though Jews had no blood

ties to Greeks.




118 Rajak, The Jewish Dialogue, 140f.
119 Rajak, The Jewish Dialogue, 143.









Josephus and Ethnicity

As there was a Greek ethnicity in Roman times, there was also a Jewish ethnicity in place.

Smith's six elements of ethnicity existed for the Jews. In addition to 1) their communal name

('IouGio L),120 they possessed 2) a national, canonized literature (the texts of the Hebrew Bible)

that detailed a myth of common descent and 3) a more recent literature (such as the books of the

Maccabees) that continued to tell their shared history. Strongly ingrained in that name and

history was their religion. It is probably true that, in antiquity, to say that someone was Jewish

always included the idea that they practiced Judaism in some form or to some extent.121 This

does not, however, warrant the idea that the religious component was necessarily the dominant

one signified by the word 'IouGLdoi. It would be correct to say, however, that in the first century

CE religion was a criterion for Jewishness and not merely an indicium. It was also well-known

that Jews had 4) a distinctive shared culture, that 5) their ancestral home was considered to be

Palestine (and especially its capital, Jerusalem), and 6) that they not only perceived but also

practiced a strong sense of communal solidarity. Items 1, 4, 5, and 6 were often noted by pagan

authors.122

While Greek ethnicity fared well under Roman domination, Jewish ethnicity did not.

Greek culture became such a powerful force that it was considered the norm, and non-Greek

cultures were considered inferior. As Verkuyten describes it,

Ethnicity and race can develop into stigma identities, which provide a chronically salient
distinction or a master status that cannot be ignored and serves to define the essential
character of those who are classified. An example of this is the identity 'Gypsy' in many


120 The meaning of the name 'Iou6lioo changed over time. It was originally, and
predominantly, an ethno-geographic term. After the Maccabean period the Judean cilum,,
changed and the term acquired a wider meaning, denoting anyone who followed a Jewish way of
life. S. Cohen, The Beginnings of Jewishness (Berkeley 1999) 69-70, 78-9.
121 S. Cohen, The Beginnings of Jewishness 135-97.
122 I will demonstrate this in chapter 3.









east European countries. A person can be a doctor, an engineer, or a teacher, but as soon as
she or he is known to be a Gypsy, this identity tends to become the definitive one.123

The same situation prevailed for Jews in the Roman empire. Some of the most abundant

evidence for Jewish engagement in ancient society has come from Egypt, where it appears that

Jews pervaded almost every level of ancient Hellenistic society. Some served as soldiers (of

various ranks, until the Roman period), some were money lenders, some were tradesmen,

contractors, horse dealers, tax-farmers, artisans, merchants, vine-dressers, weavers, potters,

musicians, doctors, etc., and more often than not they bore Greek names in addition to their

national names. "A general conclusion emerging from the surviving records is that the economic

and occupational status of Egyptian Jewry under the Ptolemies was normal to the extent that they

were represented in all callings, well represented on the land, in the armed forces and in the

government services,"124 and evidence from other places suggests that Egypt was not an

anomalous situation for the Jews under Roman rule. Jews were not distinguished from Gentiles

by their occupations,125 and even in Rome itself they appear to be regular parts of public life.

Cicero noted their presence in his public defense of Flaccus,126 and Suetonius mentions their

presence among those who mourned the death of Julius Caesar.127

Yet in spite of this thorough penetration into the institutions of the ancient world, the Jews

were viewed as different from the rest of the Greco-Roman world in every one of Smith's six

elements of ethnicity. In the next chapter I hope to describe the extent and severity of this public

perception of the Jews in the time of Josephus. For now, the point is that the perceived Roman

123 P.52.
124 S. Applebaum, 'The Social and Economic Status of Jews in the Diaspora', in S. Safrai
and M Stem (eds.), The Jewish People in the First Century (CRINT 1.2, Philadelphia 1976) 703-
4. Cf Tcherikover, CPJI.16-19; also M. Williams, The Jews Among the Greeks and Romans: A
Diasporan Sourcebook (Baltimore 1998) 19-26.
125 S. Cohen, The Beginnings of Jewishness, 37.
126 Flac. 28.
127 Jul. 84.5.









political and cultural realities of the first century CE meant that the Jews were in need of revising

and renegotiating their ethnicity if they hoped to enjoy a respected place within the larger

cultural realm. The motive for this was, as noted above, rooted in a psychological need for some

sense of self-esteem and belonging.

What was Josephus' understanding of Jewish ethnicity? For him, the term 'Iou)6ido simply

means "Jewish," and he used it in both an ethno-geographic sense and as a religious term. When

used as an ethno-geographic term, it can refer to all the inhabitants of the country called "Judea,"

or it can refer more narrowly to the people who live in the southern part of that country (as

opposed to Samaritans or Galileans).128 In fact, Josephus regularly distinguishes Jews from both

Samaritans and Idumeans ethnically, and the "boundaries of what may count as Jewish do thus

appear relatively non-negotiable."129 The phrase 'Ioua6doio T y'vo0 basically means "Judaean by

birth," and S. Cohen has argued that the phrase does not necessarily have a religious implication

for Josephus. It means that a person was born in Judea.130

One area in which Jewish ethnicity was especially vulnerable to change was in the

association of Jews with the homeland and the capital city of Jerusalem. By the time of Josephus,

it seems that "Judea" was becoming less and less of an ethnic criterion for Jews because their

territorially dislocated situations often made strong ties to the homeland difficult or nearly

impossible. The political situation contributed greatly to this condition. Josephus wrote during

the Flavian dynasty of Rome, in which broad political changes were being effected in the Roman

east. The Roman experiment with client kingdoms in the east had, in a word, failed, having



128 S. Cohen, "IOYAAIOE TO FENOE and Related Expressions in Josephus', in F.
Parente and J. Sievers (eds.), Josephus and the History of the Greco-Roman Period: Essays in
Memory of Morton S.milh (Studia Post-Biblica 41, Leiden 1994) 25-32.
129 Rajak, The Jewish Dialogue 138.
130 S. Cohen, "IOYAAIOE TO FENOE', 36-38.









resulted in too much instability. When Vespasian came to the throne, eastern client kingdoms

were dismantled and replaced by direct Roman oversight. Aristobulus, king of Lesser Armenia,

had his kingdom annexed to the province of Galatia in 71 or 72 CE; Antiochus IV, king of

Commagene, was deposed in c. 73 CE and had his kingdom annexed to the province of Syria;

Sohaemus lost his throne as king of Emesa and his territory was also attached to Syria in the

early 70's CE; Vespasian refused to reinstitute the Herodian dynasty of southern Palestine when

he declined to appoint Herod Agrippa II as king over Judea, and Traj an annexed the kingdom of

the Nabateans in southern Palestine in 106 CE. As more and more territory came under direct

Roman administration, concepts of homeland were harder to maintain. Palestine in particular saw

more than its share of Roman manipulation. ... within a time span of 132 years (63 BCE-

70CE), Palestine was divided and redivided many times, given to local dynasts, and taken from

others by the Roman oppressor."131 The imposition of Roman rule in 63 CE permanently

changed the character of the Jewish homeland. Jews saw it as becoming more and more pagan,

and it eventually lost much of its value as a political national symbol.

The terminology in the surviving texts is also telling, since "almost no one in the Flavian

period calls the Jews 'Judeans'; that is, almost no one links the ludaioi to Judea."132 The term for

the ancestral homeland becomes, among non-Jews, either Idumea or Palestina, and when pagan

authors speak of ludaioi, they do not link them with Judea. Among Romans, Judea as an

ethnographic place was, in effect, disappearing,133 and this made the religious indicium more





131 D. Mendels, The Rise and Fall of Jewish Nationalism (New York 1992) 252.
132 D. Schwartz, 'Herodians and loudaioi in Flavian Rome', in J. Edmondson et al (eds.),
Flavius Josephus and Flavian Rome (Oxford 2005) 69.
133 A similar thing happened with Greek culture. The Romans referred to Greece as
Achaea, not as Hellas.









prominent.134 Schwartz notices that "if one compares the War and the Antiquities, Josephus'

usage seems to show a growing notion of the Jews as people defined not by virtue of their

relationship to a place, but, by virtue of their relationship to a religion."135 In fact, Josephus

downplayed the significance of the Jewish homeland in his narrative of Biblical history,

Antiquitates Judaicae 1-11. In the canonical Biblical texts, the land of Palestine belongs to the

Jews by a covenantal promise from God. As Josephus tells the stories, however, he often omits

repetitions of that promise and instead turns the occupation of the land into a prophecy (and

uttered by a pagan prophet at that).136 Similarly, he omits God's order to Joshua to conquer the

land, and he regularly omits the divine promise of return to the land after the Babylonian exile.

"He simply does not portray the land as the heart of the Jewish experience."137 Josephus seems to

have acknowledged that, in the face of the political realities of his day, a strong sense of

connection with Palestine was not a viable criterion of Jewish ethnicity.

The religious dimension of Jewish ethnicity was a sensitive issue for a person in Josephus'

situation. On the one hand, Josephus remained Jewish in his religious convictions throughout his

literary works. Nowhere did he assimilate the Jewish God with a pagan god, nor offered a way

by which Jews could worship pagan gods, and he went to great lengths to explain how the

customs which seemed so odd to non-Jews were actually expressions of great piety when

understood correctly. For Josephus, being Jewish meant worshipping and living according to

Torah and Jewish customs respectively. His idea of Jewish identity is TLVE OvrTEE E pxfi

'Iou0ioU L KM TiOL XprloTjCEvoL TUOXCL i4' O'L) TE TrcaL6uOeiv'VE vo0ioOi ~r T rpbo EUO' pELav

("who Jews were from the beginning, and what fortunes they have experienced, and by what


134 D. Schwartz 69-70.
135 D. Schwartz 77.
136 AJ 4.101ff, Balaam.
137 B. Amaru, 'Land Theology in Josephus' "Jewish Antiquities"', JQR 71 (1981) 229.









lawgiver they were taught the things of piety").138 Josephus was basically invoking what Smith

identifies as a shared history. These things were not for sale, they were non-negotiable. On the

other hand, Jewish refusal to integrate into pagan religion and to give up foreign customs was

commonly interpreted as kind of malevolence against the world at worst, or a strange aloofness

at best. A large part of Josephus' task was to try to convince his Greek (i.e., Hellenistic) readers

that the Jews were sufficiently Greek culturally that these other aspects of their self-identity

should not pose a significant obstacle to full membership in Hellenistic society.

Conclusion

Josephus wrote in the milieu where older Greek things were viewed with a kind of

idealism, where Jewish things were viewed as foreign, and in which the Jews were struggling

with affirming, or renegotiating, their self-definition. It was also a time when the Jews had been

publicly defeated by Roman power, their homeland was ceasing to function as an element of

their self-understanding, and the Roman east was becoming more tightly controlled directly by

Rome. Before Josephus wrote the Bellum Judaicum, other accounts of the war either flattered the

Romans or denigrated the Jews,139 and Josephus repeatedly mentioned Roman hatred of the

Jewish nation as an important part of the background to the war.140 The public perception of

Jewish ethnicity was suffering terribly. However, Josephus also stood in a tradition of openness

to Hellenism.141 From this collection of circumstances an opportunity presented itself. Josephus

had at his disposal a literary vehicle by which he could construct an ethnicity for the Jews:

historiography in the Greek tradition. Through this genre he would contribute to the dialogue



138 AJ 1.6.
139 BJ 1.2.
140 Cf BJ3.133, 140; 4.135; 5:451, 556; 6:214, 263; etc. BJ7:47 sums it up: TO 6 Kara
uTV 'Iou6aLG)v rap& Tr&CoLv iKLaE 4t [^oo( ("hatred of the Jews by all men was at its height").
141 This is the subject of the next chapter.









about how to perceive Jewish identity in the world of the first century CE. From its roots in

Homer and on through the work of Herodotus, Greek historiography had long possessed strong

ethnic qualities and Josephus chose to exploit this function of the genre for the crisis in which he

envisioned his people. His plan was to write Jewish historiography in the Greek vein for the

purpose of negotiating a renewed definition of Jewish ethnicity in the Roman world. He himself

was well-suited to the task, since he was a Jew who lived in Rome and enjoyed Roman

citizenship and literary patronage. He immersed himself in Greek literature for the task that he no

doubt thought would redeem his people in the arena of public opinion and provide them with a

new sense of self-understanding that would carry them into the foreseeable future.

S. Cohen has argued that "the Hellenistic world not only served as the foil against which

the Jews redefined themselves, but also provided the conceptions that were essential to the new

Jewish self-definition." 142 This comports to what was noted above, that an ethnic group often

hopes to define itself in terms of the symbols of the dominant culture around it. Josephus was

keenly aware of this fact and used the conceptions, and the means for expressing them, of his day

to accomplish this redefinition. Dionysius' positive presentation of Hellenism is significant for

the present study. Dionysius was a native of Halicarnassus (east of Rome) who came to Rome c.

29 BCE after a war (the civil war in Rome) and wrote a national (Roman) history in twenty

books. He felt indebted to the Romans for the benefits of his life in Rome143 and wrote to educate

Greeks about Roman history which he felt they knew only incorrectly.144 His history concerns

ethnicity in that he set out to correct and change (for the better) the perceptions of one people



142 S. Cohen, "Religion, Ethnicity, and 'Hellenism' in the Emergence of Jewish Identity
in Maccabean Palestine" in P. Bilde et al (eds.), Religion and Religious Practice in the Seleucid
Kingdom (Aarhus 1990) 204.
143 1.6.5.
144 1.4.2.









about another. To this extent he was opening the dialogue that makes the establishment of an

ethnicity possible. All of this is remarkably similar to Josephus, who came to Rome from the east

after a war only a couple of generations later and who, it is generally acknowledged, knew the

Roman Antiquities of Dionysius145 and wrote a national (Jewish) history in twenty books that

was designed to dispel false understandings of Jewish origins and customs.146 Both authors were

engaged in the business of constructing an ethnicity for peoples of their own day. While neither

were ready to surrender either a fundamental Roman or Jewish identity respectively, both

labored to show that those identities had strong and old affinities with Hellenism. Again, we may

not suppose that Dionysius' Roman Antiquities represents the view of every Roman, but its

publication argues for a continuing acknowledgement of the Roman debt toward the Greeks and

Greek culture, even if in the end the Romans viewed themselves as better by the comparison.

More importantly, as Saunders has observed, "The philhellenes seem to have been slow to

relinquish any part of their Roman birthright. Yet from the introduction of Greek philosophy at

Rome there did slowly emerge a mingling of Greek and Roman ideals which resulted in a more

cosmopolitan view of men and of life."147 Indeed, the classic Greek distinction between Greeks

and barbarians had no counterpart in the Roman view.148 This more cosmopolitan view, which

stands behind Dionysius' work, along with ever-expanding notions of what it meant to be Greek,

opened a window of opportunity for Josephus to negotiate for the Jews a favorable place within

the sentiments of his day in Rome which were increasingly favorable toward Greek culture.



145 Cf L. Feldman, 'Hellenizations in Josephus' Jewish Antiquities: The Portrait of
Abraham', in L. Feldman and G. Hata (eds.), Josephus, Judaism, and Christianity (Detroit 1987)
134.
146 P. Collomp, 'Der Platz des Josephus in der Teknik der Hellenistichen
Geschichtsschreibung', in A. Schalit (hg.), Zur Josephus-Forschung (Darmstadt 1973).
147 Saunders 217. Cf also Balsdon 41.
148 F. W. Walbank, 'Nationality as a Factor in Roman History', HSCP 76 (1972) 158.









As Josephus undertook his literary works he was therefore engaging in a project of ethnic

self-definition that was in keeping with the concerns of other literary works in his own day. He

was also participating in a long-standing Jewish concern to re-affirm who they were in the face

of a changing world. How to do this, however, had been, and was still, debated in Josephus'

time. The Jewish literature that arose in the period from the fourth century BCE to the first

century CE (known as the Apocrypha and Pseudepigrapha) proposed different strategies that

spanned a wide range of possibilities. Josephus' choice was to attempt to define Jews in Greek

terms. That he did not chose to align Jews with Roman excellence is significant. As I have noted,

the Romans respected Greek culture but at the same time felt that they had surpassed it. By

choosing to align the Jews with Greek excellence, Josephus was careful not to claim any kind of

equal footing with Roman ascendancy.149 No one would have believed it, especially in light of

the humiliating defeat of 70 CE. Instead, Josephus chose the more humble option of aligning the

Jews with that Greek culture with which the Romans had already made peace, a culture they

could respect and despise at the same time. For Josephus, if the Jews could attain to some

semblance of the respect the Romans offered the Greeks (even if it was offered in

condescension), that would have been enough. This approach was markedly different from the

violent apocalypticism that had culminated in the First Jewish War. It was, instead, an approach

that emphasized sameness and compatibility.












149 Goodman, 'Josephus as Roman Citizen', 336-38.









CHAPTER 3
THE MILIEU IN WHICH JOSEPHUS LIVED AND WROTE

Why did Josephus feel the need to produce texts that, among other things, reconstructed

Jewish ethnicity? This question is not fully answered by the observation noted in chapter two,

that a psychological sense of self-esteem and belonging is an important factor in the development

of an ethnicity. The question may be taken further: what precipitated a sense of low self-esteem

and rejection that led Josephus and others like him to propose new ways of understanding the

relationship between the Jews and Hellenistic culture? What was going on that created a sense of

crisis calling for the reassertion of Jewish self-understanding? The answer to this question is

important because it establishes a motive, within historical conditions, for the ethnographic

feature of all of Josephus' works. People do not produce statements of ethnicity, or literary

works heavy with ethnic apologetics, spontaneously or randomly. Ethnicities need revision and

renegotiation in the face of challenge and perceived crisis that affect self-esteem. Ethnicities are,

by their nature, responses. In this chapter I hope to reconstruct a historical context for Josephus'

works that explains why concerns of ethnicity and self-definition would have been on his mind,

as well as demonstrate his awareness of them.

Mistreatment of Jews in Greco-Roman Society

I noted in the previous chapter that the Jews appeared different to their neighbors in every

way, if we use Smith's description of ethnicity as a way of comparing two groups. Even worse,

attempts by Jews in ancient times to maintain those differences in practice by conserving

traditional customs and refusing to adopt customs of the people around them (thus adopting what

appeared to be a strategy of ignoring the dominant culture) made them appear not just different,

but conceited and hostile to the rest of society. This "strangeness" was, perhaps more than









anything else, the prime factor behind anti-Jewish sentiments.1 In addition to this, the Jews of

Josephus' day had most recently been defeated by the Romans (by Pompey, who subjugated

Judea in 64 BCE, and again, of course, in the First Jewish War, 66-70 CE). Therefore this ethnic

group, which was already seen as odd and hostile, now had the added stigma of having been

humiliated in military defeat, twice within recent memory. As a result of previous conquests (at

the hands of Assyrians, Babylonians, and Greeks), by the first century CE Jews had been

dispersed all over the ancient world (commonly called the Jewish diaspora). A people who were

displaced because of war, unrest, famine, etc. now also found themselves in even more difficult

circumstances: they were a minority in a foreign place, and they generally were among the

poorer people in that place.

The picture that emerges from the ancient sources is that Jews were regularly subjected to

unfair or harsh treatment by Roman society at large, and that the Roman governmental machine

was hardly sympathetic at local levels. In what follows I will attempt to review briefly, in

chronological order, a series of events that demonstrates this picture.

Unfair economic policies toward Jews predated Roman control of the east. In the late-

second and early-first centuries BCE, a wave of nationalism swept through Egypt as the

Ptolemaic regime weakened and economic difficulties arose.2 Under this movement the Egyptian

Jews did not fare well, and the Seleucid king Seleucus IV Philopater (187-175 BCE) tried to

confiscate the temple treasury in Jerusalem for the Seleucid coffers.3 By the first century BCE,



1 Sevenster, The Roots ofPagan Anti-Semitism, 143-4. Z. Yavetz wisely suggests that
anti-Jewish sentiments in antiquity should not be viewed as a unique phenomenon but should be
understood against the wider context of antibarbarism in general. 'Judeophobia in Classical
Antiquity: A Different Approach', JJS 44 (1993) 13.
2 E. Gabba, 'The Growth of Anti-Judaism or the Greek Attitude Towards the Jews', in W.
Davies and L. Finkelstein (eds.), The Cambridge History ofJudaism, 2 (Cambridge 1989) 635.
3 2 Mac 3:1-40.









Egyptian anti-Judaism had transcended its local setting and combined with misinformation in

Greek authors and anti-Jewish propaganda from the Seleucids to create a wider anti-Jewish

environment in the ancient world.4 When Roman rule began in 31 BCE, changes in Egyptian

governmental administration resulted in Jews basically disappearing from civil service positions

in society, which probably suggests that not many of them were economically affluent at that

time.5 This significance of this is that in the ancient world, social mobility was basically

available through the network of civil service positions which contributed to the maintenance of

social homogeneity.6 In addition to being cut off from positions from which they might better

themselves, most Egyptian Jews were also subjected to heavier taxation than Greeks.7 In a

similar move, after the conflagration of 70 CE, Vespasian imposed a tax for a newfiscus

ludaicus on all Jews in the empire.8

It was well-known in many places that, prior to the First Jewish War, Jewish communities

outside of Jerusalem (the Diaspora) levied a tax among themselves and sent the sum to Jerusalem

every year.9 For example, Tacitus mentions it in his Histories (5.5) as part of his description of

the customs of the Jewish people. The problem was that it was a constant challenge for Jews to

keep these funds safe for their intended destination. For example, in Antiquitates Judaicae


4 Gabba 636, 646.
5 Applebaum, 'The Social and Economic Status', 704-5.
6 See N. Purcell, 'The Apparitores: A Study in Social Mobility', Papers of the British
School at Rome 51 (1983) 125-73.
7 The evidence is collected in CPJI nos. 60-2.
8 C.D. 65.2.
9 J. Liver, 'The Half-Shekel Offering in Biblical and Post-Biblical Literature,' HTR 56
(1963) 173-98. Josephus mentions the practice as being that of all Jews everywhere. "Oau4gUon'
6e [Lr6L5 EL' TOOOUTOC 'v TrXO&Uoc Ev T6) T1[ETEpcQ LEpG) Tr 'VTh)V TWV KarU TTlv OLKOUiEvrfv
'IouiL5G)v Kca oepo0Evo)V Tv tOE6V iL 65 KUaL TV &7rb fil( 'AoFaic KacL rfil EUipWSTrfl dcEL acrb
ou4epo6vTv EK TrOXX(Lv TTrvu XpovOw." ("And let no one wonder that there was such wealth in
our temple, since all the Jews throughout the empire, and those who worshipped God, even those
of Asia and Europe, have been sending their contributions to it from very ancient times.") AJ
14.11. Tacitus knew about it as well: Hist. 5.5.









14:112f, Josephus quotes the Historica Hypomnemata of Strabo of Cappadocia as evidence of

this problem. Strabo documented that in the course of the war in 88 BCE wrEri~c 6a MLOpL5pTir

[El( K6o] 'E' ap T&C Xp iUp 'ra' TrapEOeTO EKEl K XEOTra(Tp PC OLaXLoUooC KMcL T& T 5V 'Iou6ad)v

OKTrCKOOLC rXaXavTu ("Mithridates sent to Cos and took the funds which queen Cleopatra had put

there, and eight hundred talents of the Jews"), to which Josephus adds the explanation: "i ~tv 6'

65r46oLa0 xp 0r'aT obUK 'EOTLV T i6va r1 TOU OEoC KMIL 65Xov OTL rMfta t.t r vyK0Uav Ecu K(;) U&

XpiTart oL Ev ur 'Ao(L 'Iou6(XLOL 6L& Tbv MLOpL6Trou dO6pov" ("For we have no funds but only

those that are God's, and it is clear that the Asian Jews had sent these funds to Cos out of fear of

Mithridates").

Confiscating these funds was a relatively easy thing to do and was one of the most

common actions taken against Jewish communities. In the ancient literature we hear several

complaints that these funds had been seized by local officials. In 59 BCE Lucius Valerius

Flaccus, the imperial legate in Asia in 62-61 BCE, was tried for maladministration over a

complaint by the Jews of Asia that he had confiscated their funds which were intended for

Jerusalem. He was defended by Cicero. The Roman Senate had banned the export of gold and

silver to foreign countries, but the Jews had always been granted an exemption in order to pay

their temple tax.10 Flaccus, however, ignored the exemption and put the money into the Roman

publicum. Cicero's defense was to admit that the charges were true and that his client was acting

dutifully, following Roman law in prohibiting the export of the funds. In the course of the

defense, Cicero shows little restraint in denigrating the Jews. He says:

Quis est, iudices, qui hoc non vere laudare possit? Exportari aurum non oportere cum
saepe antea senatus tum me consule gravissime iudicavit. Huic autem barbarae
superstition resistere severitatis, multitudinem Iudaeorum flagrantem non numquam in
contionibus pro re public contemnere gravitatis summae fuit. ... Stantibus Hierosolymis

10 E. Smallwood, The Jews Under Roman Rule From Pompey to Domitian (Leiden 1976)
126.









pacatisque Iudaeis tamen istorum religion sacrorum a splendore huius imperi, gravitate
nominis nostri, maiorum institutes abhorrebat; nunc vero hoc magis, quod illa gens quid de
nostro imperio sentiret ostendit armis; quam cara dis immortalibus esset docuit, quod est
victa, quod elocata, quod serva facta.

("Who is there, judges, who cannot truly praise this? The senate had most seriously ruled
often before, while I was consul, that gold ought not be exported. But to resist this
barbarous superstition was to be strict, and to disregard the multitude of Jews, who were
inflamed in the assemblies about public business, was an act of the highest dignity ...
While Jerusalem was standing and the Jews were peaceful, the religion of that detestable
people was adverse to the splendor of this empire, the dignity of our name, and the
customs of our ancestors; now it is more truly detestable, since that people have shown
with arms what they think about our empire; and just how dear it was to the immortal gods
has been shown, because it was conquered, farmed out for taxes, and has become
occupied.")1

The defeat of Jerusalem to which Cicero referred was that of Pompey in 64/3 BCE, which

brought Judea under Roman control. Cicero's speech was delivered in 59 BCE, so the memory

of that defeat was still fresh in Roman minds. Cicero seemed confident that he could easily

arouse anti-Jewish sentiments among the jurors, whom he was attempting to persuade to see the

issue from the Roman side. To deny the Jews an exemption was simply to hold them to the

demands of law; Flaccus was acting properly, Cicero explains. According to him, the Jews had

proven themselves to be troublemakers both in Rome and in Jerusalem, and this latest incident

was another example of their rebellion against Roman law. He therefore argued that they

deserved to have their requests ignored. Furthermore, he added, the inferiority of the Jews as a

people was evident in the results of the recent conflict. The gods obviously did not favor them. In

another place in the same speech, he referred to Jerusalem as suspiciosa ac maledica civitate ("a

suspicious and slanderous city").12 Yet we probably ought not make too much of Cicero's

rhetoric here. It was his common practice, in such judicial settings, to incriminate the national


11Flac. 69.
12 Flac. 68.









character of opponents.13 When we take this rhetorical practice into account, "there is little left of

Cicero's supposed anti-Semitism."14 In the rest of Cicero's extant works the Jews are

conspicuously ignored, so he does not seem to have been particularly troubled by, nor interested

in, them. Yet a case can be made that Cicero was playing upon current anti-Jewish sentiments,

and that "... Cicero counted on arousing anti-Jewish prejudice in the jurors' minds to colour their

consideration of the charges against Flaccus."15

Another example dates from 14 BCE and comes from Josephus:

T6OT 6e Trepi trv 'IviLAv brUTp V yEvoiHeov dV roiX TrXniOo 'Iou6gcav Titd Tro6XEL o)KEL
TrPOo~tEL KcLpo Kca Tr cppeOLca( E~TrELXTI 44EVOL KtCL T& ErTrPELCa 'e yov a ieTrrpO e COVuTO
frITE V6o0Lo OLKELOLc E 4EVOL XpfaOUcL 6iKac TE UcVcyKcLO[LEVOL 6L6ov0cL KWT' E'TriPELcUv
eV EUOUvovTOV iv L'V paiLs y 14eipauLe KCoL TV dEL 'IEpoooXuha pl xpratov advattLOEiwvov
4dcULPpoLVTO OTpateLWV KCaL XELTOUpyLGv cdvayLyKcaCdovoL KOLVo)VELV KCaL TrpO TaXUTa
5(TrcLvcv Th)V LEpG)V Vp6r')VPav 4Lv (X)eLcrdoav 'PUe' 4ocaov XITOL( ETrLUpE*,vrov KaTU
TOUR OLKELOUc CT1V VO[LOU.

("Then when they [Agrippa and Herod] were in Ionia, a great multitude of Jews who
inhabit their cities came, seizing the opportunity and courage, and related the abuses they
were suffering, that they were not allowed to have their own laws, that they were forced to
present their lawsuits, by the abuse of the judges, on the holy days, and that they were
deprived of the funds that had been set aside for Jerusalem, having been forced to
participate in campaigns and public services and to spend the sacred funds for these things,
from which they were always released by the Romans, who had allowed them to live
according to their own laws.")16

The litany of complaints reveals a situation of frequent interference in their way of life and, even

more, being forced to do things that were against their religion. The fact that they had lawsuits in


13 To cite one example, Cicero used similar language defending Fonteius against the
Celts. He said: ceterae pro religionibus suis bella suscipiunt, istae contra omnium religiones; illae
in bellis gerendis ab dis immortalibus pacem ac veniam petunt, istae cum ipsis dis immortalibus
bella gesserunt ("others undertake wars on behalf of their religions, but they wage war against
the religion of all; others when waging war beg for peace and pardon from the immortal gods,
but they have waged war with the immortal gods themselves"). Pro Font., 30. See also Walbank
158.
14 M. Stern (ed.), Greek and Latin Authors on Jews and Judaism (Jerusalem 1984) 194.
See also A. Marshall, 'Flaccus and the Jews of Asia (Cicero 'Pro Flacco' 28.67-69)', Phoenix 29
(1975) 141-2.
15 Marshall 142.
16 AJ 16.27-8.









the public courts suggests that they had been defrauded in some ways and needed to seek redress

in the local legal system. They were, however, forced to conduct legal business on Saturdays in

violation of their practice of not working on the Sabbaths. The choice they were given was either

to violate the Sabbath and get some legal relief, or keep the Sabbath and suffer injustices. Their

temple contributions were also confiscated and spent on public works, and they were pressed

into military service in spite of the fact that it was well-known that the Sabbath regulations

forbade Jews from taking up arms on that day.17 In fact, it seems that Jews were regularly

granted exemption from Roman military service for this very reason.18

Later in the same book, Josephus relates in a lengthy section (16.160-173) that Jews in

Asia and Cyrene were experiencing, among other things, further interference with their

collection of money for the Jerusalem temple, and they appealed to Augustus for help. All

Josephus says is that kv 6 'r TO TE 6L' E'TrTpeLa( EXO6vov TGxv 'EXXlvowv abUTroi 6' KKCL

XprlUToV iLep)v c caLpeoRLv ("at that time the Greeks mistreated them so far that they took their

sacred funds").19 The Jews sent envoys to Augustus to complain about this treatment, and

Augustus ruled in their favor. Josephus then quotes the decree Augustus made about this matter

and proceeds to quote five more such decrees: one by Augustus addressed to Gaius Norbanus

Flaccus, the proconsul of Asia, one by Agrippa addressed to the people of Ephesus, another by

Agrippa to the people of Cyrene, one by Flaccus to the magistrates of Sardis, and one by the

proconsul Julius Antonius to the people of Ephesus, all to the same effect, that the money the

Jews collected for the Jerusalem temple was not to be touched. The picture that develops is that

seizure of Jewish Diaspora funds intended for the Jerusalem temple was not an uncommon


17 Cf AJ 14.226.
8 S. Applebaum, 'The Legal Status of the Jewish Communities in the Diaspora', in The
Jewish People in the First Century (CRINT 1.2, Philadelphia 1974) 459-60.
19 AJ 16.160.









occurrence in the cities where Jews lived, and that the Jews complained about it often. The

overall purpose of these stories, which are a major and distinctive part of the Antiquitates

Judaicae, was to establish that Romans had always sided with Jews when it came to practicing

their customs,20 although this falls far short of any official "charter" of Jewish privilege across

the empire.21 Josephus' overall appeal for ethnic toleration of the Jews was not new. The fact that

he felt compelled to rehash the matter suggests, however, that anti-Jewish sentiments had risen

and now required that his audience be reminded of the long-standing friendly disposition of

Rome towards the Jews.

Perhaps one of the most famous incidents of Jewish mistreatment happened in Egypt

during the tenure of Aulus Avilius Flaccus (32-8 CE), an event that has come to be called the

first pogrom. Philo of Alexandria was a witness to the scene. In 38 CE Herod Agrippa I (who

was a friend of the emperor Gaius) visited Alexandria on his way to take his new position as

"king" of part of Palestine, and on his visit he was publicly insulted by anti-Jewish Greeks in that

city. The incident quickly spilled over into the synagogues and the Jewish sections of the city.

Many Jews were killed or tortured, their homes ransacked and their possessions looted. Philo laid

the blame for the riot at the feet of the Roman governor Flaccus, who, he charges, was paranoid

with suspicion that Agrippa was out to topple him.22 The governor failed to restrain the violent

mob and, according to Philo, even encouraged its actions. The groundwork for this violence had

been laid in the time of Augustus, when he confirmed the special privileges the Jews already

enjoyed and at the same time denied the Alexandrians' request for a senate.23 The Jews had long

shown loyalty to Rome, but Alexandrians were anti-Roman. Action against the Jews therefore


20 S. J. Case, 'Josephus' Anticipation of a Domitianic Persecution', JBL 44 (1925) 14.
21 T. Rajak, The Jewish Dialogue i/ ith Greece and Rome (Leiden: Brill, 2002) 301-11.
22 Ph., In Flaccum 10-20.
23 CPJ II no. 150.









became a convenient way for Alexandrians to vent their dislike of Rome.24 Flaccus eventually

fell victim to the political intrigues of the day, resulting in banishment and execution, but the

Jews found no redress in the emperor Gaius who treated their delegation scornfully at Rome.

When Claudius came to the throne, the Jews appealed once more for reparations, but all they got

was an order not to push the situation either in Alexandria or in Rome any farther.25

We should not develop the impression that Alexandria was the norm.26 Of course, Jews

coexisted peacefully with their pagan neighbors in many places. For example, there was a large

Jewish population in Syrian Antioch (estimated at 65,000 persons), many of whom probably

enjoyed civic privileges equal to those of Greeks, and they constituted a TroXLtuEta--an ethnic

group from abroad that constituted a self-contained, but not autonomous, political community

and that enjoyed a pleasant existence there.27 Furthermore, Dio Cassius portrays the

Alexandrians as a people who did not get along with anyone28-an exaggeration, but probably

indicative of the volatile situation that seems to have been characteristic of that city. However,





24 H. Bell, 'Anti-Semitism in Alexandria', JRS 31 (1941) 4.
25 The text of the decree is in CPJII no. 153 and A. Hunt and C. Edgar (trans.) Select
Papyri II (Loeb Classical Library, Cambridge, MA 1963) 79-89.
26 As J. Collins has suggested, the rioting in Alexandria in 38 CE was the product of
specific circumstances in that city and not the product of a general hatred of Jews. 'Anti-
Semitism in Antiquity?: The Case of Alexandria', in C. Bakhos (ed.), Ancient Judaism in its
Hellenistic Context (SupJSJ 95, Leiden 2005) 18.
27 C. Kraeling, 'The Jewish Community at Antioch', JBL 51 (1932) 130-60; CJP 1.6.
There is scholarly debate over whether Jews constituted a TroXruT.LT in any of the cities where
they lived. J. Meleze-Modrzejewski denies that the Jews had such a status ('How to be a Greek
and Yet a Jew in Hellenistic Alexandria', in S. Cohen and E. Frerichs (eds.), Diasporas in
Antiquity (Brown Judaic Studies 288, Atlanta 1993) 77-80). However, the Letter ofAristeas
(310) refers to Alexandrian Jews by this term, and two inscriptions from Berenice in Cyrenaica
(1st cent. CE) mention 'E60o TroiL pXouoL KCL T~ TroXLTEU't'TL T()v 'v BepEviLK 'IouaG& v. E.
Schirer, The History of the Jewish People in the Age of Jesus Christ, 3.1 (rev. and ed. G. Vermes
et al, 3 vols.; Edinburgh 1986) 88.
28 65.8.









the evidence is broad enough to conclude that Jews regularly and frequently suffered various

forms of harassment from their neighbors, even if it was not universal.

Within Palestine, a well-known Roman governor, Pontius Pilate, incurred the displeasure

of Jews more than once for actions they considered to be willfully offensive. Josephus reports in

Antiquitates Judaicae 18.55-59 that Pilate set up images of Tiberius in Jerusalem. He also tells

the story in Bellum Judaicum 2.169-174. That the same story appears in both works suggests that

our author saw this as important for his purposes. The date was probably Pilate's first year in

office, 26 CE, and the images were most likely the signa of the Roman cohort in Judea, which

had representations of the emperor.29 In the Antiquitates Judaicae Josephus calls them Trporo[L&a

Kaoaapo a rU oiTaiaic Tr poToIoav ("busts of Caesar, which were attached to the ensigns"), in

the Bellum Judaicum &e KcxCalpo w E'LKOva at aU TitCaL KcXOwVTr L ("the images of Caesar which

are called ensigns"). The exact nature of the Jewish objection is unclear, because there was

nothing in Biblical Jewish law that would have prohibited this.30 Nevertheless, the Jerusalem

Jews objected that this action on Pilate's part violated a Jewish prohibition of idols within the

city. Pilate received the Jewish objectors in the stadium at Caesarea Maritima, and stationed

soldiers in the wings who, at his signal, advanced on the crowd. The procurator eventually

backed down, but the incident reflected a willingness on his part to use force, instead of legal

procedures, to settle complaints about the violation of Jewish religious sensibilities.

As it stands, this story is an example of an unprovoked and undeserved affront against

Jewish piety. The occasion for bringing the signa to Jerusalem was that Pilate had moved Roman

troops to Jerusalem for the winter. In the version of the story in the Antiquitates Judaicae,



29 C. Kraeling, 'The Episode of the Roman Standards at Jerusalem', HTR 35 (1942) 263-
89.
30 Feldman, 'Flavius Josephus Revisited', 818.









Josephus says IILM&To 6' 6 Ti 'Iou6aiL ';YEti v orpar'CLv EK KEaLoCpEUEL &'yay(yv KKL

eGL6puoca XELcU56LoUo V ouv Iv 'poooo0XuOL; EiTrL KTA6&UOU L iTV VOIL'O)V iTv 'Io6U'CLKG;v

04p6vr1oe ("Pilate, the governor of Judea, intended the abolition of Jewish customs when he led

the army from Caesarea and wintered it in Jerusalem"). Caesarea Maritima, thirty five miles

away, was the normal residence of the procurator. Pilate certainly would have felt at home there,

for the city was thoroughly Romanized. According to Josephus, then, the reason Pilate made this

invasive move to Jerusalem for the winter was that he willfully intended to violate and do away

with Jewish customs. In other words, the Jews were innocent victims of a man who had no

respect for their religion and who was bent on causing trouble. Given the pluralism of Roman

religion, this is surely designed to strike the reader as odd and sinister.

Josephus also relates a mistreatment of Jews by the same governor only a year or so later.

He says

'Y6T rov 6e EircUyoyWYiv tEL T& 'IEpooAu[LcL 'EirpcLEV 6avTrUVT1J TWV LEpU)V XPTr1 Po)V EKXPcLp.v
T rv UapX1rv TOU pe'uiccTOr Ooov &6(TO o6LCHoV 6LCKooLG)v ol 6' OUK T'y&cTrr)v TOLt &4oi Tb
i56op 6pG~iEvoL; TroXXca TE upLu6 ~de &vOp&Trrv ouvEXO6ovrT KatEPo()v crToO TrrauoaoGc
TOU ETrL TOLo6oUTOL TpoOu4ouL EoV TLve 65E KUCL A0OL60opL Xp6ievoL i'ppLov el; T0V cv6pa
ola 6T tLXEL TTpaooeLV oiiLXo0. 6 6 e aOTOXT Tt EKELV(OV TroA TTrXfiO orparuTioL v
a4rEXo 6vov O'L E0 E POVO oKUTA(LXC 6UT T(Li OTOAXoCL 6LaLrEi~' EL Trde EpLEXOOLEv a(o6U;
aU6t EKE XEUuoev Vc(vaopeLV TWV 6e (pPrLKOl h)v dEL TO6 OL60peLV TTro66LcXOL TToL

EXpvrTo TrXTiyaL; TOU6; TE OopupouvTra ev 'LOaC KUCL 4i Kol(Covrt e ol 6' ELoe4)poTro
aacXK6v ou 6Ev odOTE &oTrXOL XAivr|OTeV iUTr' Uav6p6Cv EK TxapoKEUTe E( TL()eP0poiEV(V TrOXXOL
i v "UT(V TUC/UT1 KCL cdTr'OvrTIKOV ol 6e KUCL Tpaua4TL'L oVEX6JprT1oav KCL oU5T) Tr o6EU L Ti


("He [Pilate] made a supply of water for Jerusalem, taking for its expense the sacred funds,
for the head of the stream was two hundred stadia away. But they [the Jews] were not
pleased with the things that had been done regarding the water, and many ten thousands of
men got together and complained to him to stop such a desire. And some attacked him with
verbal abuse and insulted the man, just as a crowd likes to do. But he, covering with their
robes a great multitude of soldiers, who carried clubs under their robes, and sending them
to where they might surround them [the Jews], himself ordered the Jews to leave, but when
they began to insult him, he gave to the soldiers the signal which had been previously
arranged. They gave much more blows than Pilate had ordered, punishing equally the
troublemakers and those who were not, and they brought on nothing mild so that unarmed









people were seized by armed men, and many of them who were attacked in this way even
died, and the wounded ones withdrew, and thus the revolt ended.").31

Given the other examples reviewed above, it is clear that Pilate was acting in a way that other

Roman officials had acted toward Jews in other parts of the empire. His seizure of Jewish funds

was not unprecedented. Funds in Jerusalem must have been especially tempting. The annual

temple tax sent from Jews in the provinces made the temple rich and had made it a target more

than once. For example, Crassus plundered the Jerusalem temple during his Parthian

expedition.32 How much money was taken in this particular incident we do not know, but it

seems that the knowledge that a sizeable sum of money was sitting in Jerusalem proved an

irresistible temptation for a procurator who wished to engage in public works as part of a

program to honor the emperor and stay in his favor.33 Josephus reports the incident as a misuse

of Roman imperium and a breach of good will with the client subjects, the Jews.

Josephus himself had a first-hand experience with unfair treatment of Jews at the hands of

Romans when, at the age of 26 (63/64 CE), he participated in a delegation to Rome to appeal to

Nero on behalf of some Jewish priests from the homeland of Judea (remember, Josephus was

such a person himself) who had been imprisoned and sent to Rome for trial. The details of this

are sketchy. He says

MET' ELKOOTOV 6e KcL `KTOV EvL duTrv dEL 'PPo[Trlv [0oL OUVETrEOeV &vcVOxpvL 6L& T OIv
XEXOTrloo4EVTirv aUL'iav KaU' ov xp6vov "XAL Trfl 'Iou1)aia[ EiTrETpoTrEUEv 'LEpElt TLVC(;
ouv OELG E4iol KXaXOb) KxyaUOOk) 6L& tLLKP(V Kca TT1v TUXOUUoav caLLav 65'oa(C EL'( tlv
'PGjtTIv 'ETrE*t XO 6yov 6iE'ovTa (; Kcaoapi oi Ey'Y Tropov EUpEoOaCL pouXt0oEVOc
ooWtTrpLTaL dUXLora 65 TrTuOe6lvo OTL KcaUTrEp EV KC(KOLc jOVTE OUK ETrEX'.OOVto Trfl| E' T6
OeLov EUIo1EPELca ..'. dOLK6iTIv el tilv T'PotTIrv ... 6i& 4LALX(wU 4LK6OtTIv 'AXLTU6pQ
tLtotXoyofo 6' rIv omocU t&XLOTFCa TCo NEpovi KaTaLLOtLLo 'IouGa)xo( T6 yEvo( KaL 6t' amTo6
nIoTrraLC TT Tof Ka[oappo( yuvaLKL yvooO et. Trpovo3) Oe TdXLoTa TrxapaKaUEoaC aUrTiv



31 AJ 18.60-2.
32 AJ 14.105-9.
33 J. Taylor, 'Pontius Pilate and the Imperial Cult in Roman Judea', NTS 52 (2006) 555-
82.









TOi( 'LEpELc XUOAVCI L 9 [EyXOV 6e 5PE;G)GV Trp6o T) EUEPYEoLc TMVUTl TuXcv Trapc& TrU
noTTrcLa(X UTrECioTpE4oV E'rl TiTi1v o'iKEiav.

("When I was in my 26th year, it fell to me to go up to Rome for the reason that will now
be stated: At the time when Felix was procurator of Judea, some priests who were close
friends to me, and fine and good men, were bound for a small and indefinite reason and
sent to Rome to furnish a defense to Caesar, men for whom I was desiring to find a means
of rescuing, especially since I learned that although they were living in hardships, they did
not forget piety toward the divine being .... I arrived at Rome ... and through friendship I
became known to Aliturus, a Jew by race but who was especially mindful to Nero, and
through him I became known to Poppea, Caesar's wife. I gave thought as quickly as
possible, calling on her for help that the priests be released; and having gained great gifts
from Poppea, in addition to this service, I returned home").34

We do not know what these priests had done to land them in this trouble. The picture Josephus

gives us is that the procurator's actions were motivated out of spite against Jews rather than out

of any serious legal offense. The charges against them, Josephus says, were trivial. Whether this

assessment of the situation is historically correct or not, we will never know, but it is not out of

line with the way other Roman officials sometimes treated Jews, especially those officials who

were assigned to Judea. These priests may have done nothing more than irritate the procurator

with some complaint of a civil nature, enough that the procurator could accuse them of causing

civil unrest. The fact that the matter was resolved so easily suggests that no serious infraction of

Roman law was involved. We may also surmise that these Jews had already had a hearing before

the procurator and had appealed to Rome. Felix was recalled from office some time in the late

50's CE. Josephus says he joined the delegation to Rome in his twenty-sixth year, or 63-64 CE.

Therefore the Jewish priests Felix had sent to Rome had been held in custody on minor charges

for between six and ten years without a hearing before the emperor. The wheels of justice had

been turning slowly for these people.35


34 Vit. 1.13-14, 16.
35 In the New Testament's Acts of the Apostles (12.1-12, 25) a similar scene is described
as another Jew, Paul, stood trial before Felix's successor, Porcius Festus. Felix had left Paul's
case unresolved for two full years. Festus admitted that he could not discern that Paul had









The events reviewed above paint a general picture of frequent harassment of Jews at the

local level in the provinces, an harassment that was frequently instigated by Roman officials

themselves. It was not official persecution, but it was not kind treatment either. Daniel correctly

observes that "The Greek and Roman attitude toward them was more one of contempt than of

hatred,"36 and Gruen notes that "Romans showed little understanding of Judaism, but were

hardly inveterate bigots. The texts reveal neither intolerance nor racism. And nothing in them

suggests that Romans were bent on persecution."37 These actions did, however send the message

that the Jews were not considered social equals.

The kinds of harassment noted above reflect in actions the derogatory comments we hear

about the Jews in the ancient literature.38 Apollonius Molo (first cent. BCE), a famous

rhetorician whose pupils included Cicero and Caesar, referred to the Jews as cowards, godless,

witless, hostile to other men, the vilest of all men, and having contributed nothing to

civilization.39 Similarly, according to Augustine, Seneca called the Jews sceleratissimae gentis





committed any crime but indicated that he was willing to sacrifice Paul (and turn him over to his
enemies) for the sake of initial good relationships with the local client authorities, and so Paul
exercised his right toprovocatio. This incident took place in 57 CE, when Porcius Festus began
his procuratorship in Judea, only six years before Josephus made his trip to Rome. When the
account in Acts ends, Paul had sat in custody in Rome for two more years, still waiting for his
trial before the emperor (28.30). One is also reminded of the group of Greeks of which Polybius
was a part. They were sent to Rome in 168 BCE on charges of opposition to the sovereignty of
Rome and held for seventeen years without trial. Hata has suggested, in a highly speculative
article, that Josephus' story is fictitious. G. Hata, 'Imagining Some Dark Periods in Josephus'
Life', in F. Parente and J. Sievers (eds.), Josephus and the History of the Greco-Roman Period:
Essays in Memory of Morton Smnith (Studia Post-Biblica 41, Leiden 1994) 314.
36 J. Daniel, 'Anti-Semitism in the Hellenistic-Roman Period', JBL 98 (1979) 53.
37 E. Gruen, 'Roman Perspectives on the Jews in the Age of the Great Revolt', in A.
Berlin and J. Overman (eds.), The First Jewish Revolt: Archaeology, History, and Ideology
(London 2002) 37.
38 For a full treatment, see Stem, Greek andLatin Authors.
39 As reported by Josephus in Ap. 2.148, 236.









("a most wicked people").40 The poverty of many Jews also made them despised, as when

Martial describes a matre doctus ... rogare ludaeus ("the Jew taught by his mother to beg").41

These opinions were based largely on misinformation or malicious interpretations about

actual Jewish practices. Most Greek and Latin authors do not seem to have investigated these

matters much at all, and simply repeated common (and malevolent) stories about Jewish

practices, their origins, and their meanings that were demonstrably incorrect. For example,

Horace, Tacitus, Juvenal, Petronius, Seneca, and Dio Cassius all viewed the Sabbath observance

as the practice of idleness and a waste of time.42 Pliny the Elder described Judaism as a kind of

magic,43 and Pompeius Trogus said the Jews came from Damascus,44 while Strabo repeated a

story that said the Jews were Egyptians.45 Even when Varro, the great scholar and forerunner of

the Augustan religious restoration, commended Jews for worshipping an aniconic deity, he was

nevertheless misinformed when he said that the Jews worshipped the Roman god Jupiter.46 The

transmission of such stories, careless by modern historical standards, is indeed partially

attributable to the nature of historiography in the ancient Hellenistic world. Much of it sounds

like stereotyping and it cannot be taken at face value. However, the creation and propagation of

stereotypes reflects a prejudice that was willing to believe such outrageous stories about Jews in

the first place. Furthermore, as Gruen has pointed out, what is interesting is that anti-Jewish



40 De civ. D. 6.11.
41 12.57.13, as noted by Daniel, 'Anti-Semitism', 52.
42 Hor. Satires 1.9; Tac. Hist. 5.4.; Juv. 14.105-6; Petr. Satyr. frag. 37; Seneca, as
reported in August., C.D. 6.11; D.C. 37.17. Older Greek writers such as Agatharchides of Cnidus
believed the same thing (quoted to this effect by Josephus in Ap. 1.209-12).
43 HN 30.11: Est et alia magices factio a Mose et lanne et Lotape ac Iudaeis pendens, sed
multis milibus annorum post Zoroastren ("There is another branch of magic, derived from Moses
and Jannes and Lotapes and the Jews, but coming many thousand years after Zoroaster").
44 In Justin's epitome of the Historiae Philippicae bk. 36 (epitome 2.1).
45 From Strabo's lost Historica Hypomnemata, quoted by Josephus AJ 14.118.
46 In August., De Consensu Evangelistarum 1.22.30, 31; 1.27.42.









sentiments seem to be the same both before and after the War.47 That is, the sentiment remained

constant, apparently well-rooted in the Roman psyche.

A clearer example is the slander that appears to have been widespread in the first century,

that the Jews worshipped the head of an ass in the Jerusalem temple. Tacitus mentions it,48 and

Josephus includes it in his list of things to refute in his Contra Apionem.49 A sense of the

animosity some Greeks felt toward the Jews is related in another story, apparently also widely-

circulated,50 that the reason the Jewish temple in Jerusalem was off-limits to everyone was

because the Jews kept a Greek captive there and fed him liberally in order to use him as a human

sacrifice and to eat his flesh.51 According to the story, the eating of the victim's entrails was

accompanied by an oath in which the Jews vowed to hate Greeks. What is especially interesting

about the story is that the Greeks are the yearly object of Jewish hatred. Similarly, the Suda

lexicon reports that an otherwise unknown author Damocritus (late first century BCE or early

first century CE) related a story that the Jews hunted down and captured a foreigner every seven

years, and killed him by shredding his flesh.52 The stories emphasize the extreme "otherness" of

the Jews as perceived by pagans, a cultural distance that was interpreted as hostility. Such tales


47 E. Gruen, 'Roman Perspectives', 28-9.
48 Hist. 5.4.
49 Ap. 2.80ff The story was as old as the third century BCE, probably originated in
Egypt, and eventually existed in three versions. B. Bar-Kochva, 'An Ass in the Jerusalem
Temple-The Origins and Development of the Slander', in L. Feldman and J. Levison (eds.),
Josephus' Contra Apionem: Studies in its Character and Context i/th a Latin Concordance to
the Portion Missing in Greek (Arbeiten zur Geschichte des Antiken Judentums und des
Urchristentums 34, Leiden 1996) 310-26. The fact that it is recorded in Mnaseas, Apollonius
Molon, Posidonius, Damocritus, Apion, Plutarch, and Tacitus is evidence that anti-Jewish
slanders were wide-spread in antiquity and probably more numerous than the extant evidence
betrays. Sevenster, The Roots ofPagan Anti-Semitism, 8-11.
50 Josephus says that Apion was acting as spokesman for others (propheta vero aliorum
factus est Apion) Ap. 2.91.
51Ap. 2.91-5.
52 FgrHist 730. The mention of "every seven years" is possibly a gross misunderstanding
of the Jewish cycle of Sabbath years.









were designed to portray the Jews as barbarians, the enemies of civilized society, people who

were not fully human and who, worst of all, in the worst kind of deception hid their hostility in

the guise of religious piety. 53

Jews were generally regarded as a backwards, foreign (i.e., un-Roman) people whose ways

and beliefs were strange. As Daniel has noted, "A survey of the comments about Jews in the

Hellenistic-Roman literature shows that they were almost universally disliked, or at least viewed

with an amused contempt."54 Furthermore, their strict monotheism, coupled with privileges that

exempted them from Roman institutions like the emperor cult and the fact that they often

willfully segregated themselves from others in the cities where they lived, made them appear

aloof and, even worse, hostile to the rest of society. Such was the impression of Philostratus,

Diodorus Siculus, and Juvenal.55 Some of the most vitriolic statements are found in Tacitus. In

one place he says:

Hi ritus quoquo modo inducti antiquitate defenduntur: cetera institute, sinistra foeda,
pravitate valuere. Nam pessimus quisque spretis religionibus patriis tribute et stipes illuc
congerebant, unde auctae Iudaeorum res, et quia apud ipsos fides obstinata, misericordia in
promptu, sed adversus omnis alios hostile odium. Separati epulis, discreti cubilibus,
proiectissima ad libidinem gens, alienarum concubitu abstinent; inter se nihil inlicitum.
Circumcidere genitalia instituerunt ut diversitate noscantur. Transgressi in morem eorum
idem usurpant, nec quicquam prius imbuuntur quam contemnere deos, exuere patriam,
parents liberos fratres vilia habere.

("This worship [the Sabbath], however it was introduced, is defended by its antiquity; the
other customs, perverted and disgusting, are superior in their depravity, for the worst
among all other people, scorning the religions of their homelands, piled up contributions
and presents there, from which the wealth of the Jews was augmented; and among
themselves they are resolutely loyal, displaying compassion, yet they show hostile hatred
against all others. They are separate at feasts, they sleep apart, they are a nation most
abandoned to lust, and they abstain from intercourse with foreign women; among
themselves nothing is unlawful. They instituted circumcision that they might be known as
different, and those who have gone over to their custom practice it; nor do they give any


53 J. Rives, 'Human Sacrifice among Pagans and Christians,' JRS 85 (1995) 71-2.
54 Daniel, 'Anti-Semitism', 46.
55 Philostr., VA 5.33; D.S.,34.1; 40.3-4; Juv. Satires 14.102-4.









instruction first than to despise the gods, to disown their country, and to consider parents,
children, and brethren worthless.")56

When seen in the light of these kinds of remarks, actions by local officials that disregarded

Jewish rights are not surprising.

Josephus' Own Experiences

We must not ignore Josephus' personal experience with anti-Jewish sentiments, for these

were surely powerful forces that factored into his writing plans. In Palestine Josephus knew well

the tensions between Jews and the native Syro-Greek populations, and he cited these tensions as

a fundamental contributing factor in the start of the First Jewish War.7 There were several more

opportunities to experience similar tension in Rome. At first glance, Josephus' situation in Rome

seems to have been comfortable if not privileged. Vespasian granted Josephus citizenship, an

apartment in the emperor's house on the Quirinal hill (in regio VI of Rome), and a pension.58

The emperor also gave him land in Judea, which Domitian later declared tax-exempt.59 However,

closer examination reveals that there was little of elite treatment here. Vespasian's palace was on

the Palatine hill, so Josephus was being kept at a distance from emperor even if he did enjoy a

free room from him. By 94 CE the house on the Quirinal hill was demolished by Domitian to

build the temple of the gens Flavia, and we may suppose that Josephus was either evicted or




56 Hist. 5.5.
57 Bilde, 'The Causes of the Jewish War', 189-90: "An important aspect of this conflict,
in the view of Josephus, was the ethnic composition of the Roman auxiliaries in Palestine,
because these were dominated precisely by natives among the non-Jewish inhabitants. According
to Josephus this state of affairs was a direct contributory cause of the war." Of these people
Josephus said do Kci ~TOT( ETrLOUoL XpovoL; [EyV tyLorT)V 'Iou65aoL; eyevovro outiopG1v apx
TOU KarCT cJDXpov TTroXE4o oTrippara paXd6OVT ("who in the following times were those who
became the greatest hazards to the Jews, sowing the seeds of the war beginning at the time of
Florus") (AJ 19.364).
58 Vit. 423.
59 Vit. 425, 429.









relocated, presumably to a less prominent place.60 The Flavians actively promoted eastern nobles

in their administration, so Josephus' treatment was nothing special, nor was the gift of tax

exemption by Domitian, who gave the same privilege to all teachers of grammar and rhetoric.61

There is no indication that Josephus knew anyone within the imperial family except Titus, and

even then there is no indication of familiarity. It is not even certain, contrary to common

assumption, that the emperors commissioned Josephus' works62 (Epaphroditus is named as his

patron for Antiquitates Judaicae, not the emperor), nor is there any evidence that Josephus had

any important connections in Roman society with anyone from the equestrian order or above. An

author who was not reluctant to sing his own praises surely would have mentioned such social

connections if he had them. He mentions one Catullus, the TlyE4tv of Cyrene, who implicated

Josephus in the riots in Alexandria.63 The exact identity of this Catullus is problematic, but even

without such details all that can be said is that Josephus was prominent enough to become the

target of anti-Jewish rhetoric by a member of the Roman aristocracy.64 All Josephus could say

about his own status was that he had been granted Roman citizenship by the emperor, but in the

first century CE this was nothing uncommon either; "there is nothing to distinguish Josephus'

status and role as an imperial client from that of hundreds if not thousands of other imperial

clients with the name Flavius."65 This is a far cry from any notion that he kept and maintained a

network of social contacts among the elite and powerful in Rome. Price has also suggested, with


60 Cotton and Eck 39-41. This corresponds with evidence that suggests that the latter part
of Domitian's principate was characterized by increased emphasis on Roman nationalism
(specifically, the imperial cult) and a stricter policy toward Jews. E. Smallwood, 'Domitian's
Attitude toward the Jews and Judaism', CP 51 (1956) 1-13.
61 S. Mason, '"Should Any Wish to Enquire Further"', 75f.
62 S. Mason, '"Should Any Wish to Enquire Further"', 77.
63 BJ7.437-53.
64 Cotton and Eck 48.
65 J. Price, 'The Provincial Historian in Rome', in J. Sievers and G. Lembi (eds.),
Josephus and Jewish History in Flavian Rome and Beyond (SupJSJ 104, Leiden 2005) 106.









plausibility, that Josephus probably never did any public recitations of his works, given his poor

spoken Greek, and so he was not a regular among the literary figures in Rome in his time.66 He

seems only to have enjoyed the ordinary beneficia that emperors were generous to give anyway,

and nothing more, and by all evidence he was basically ignored by the elite in Rome.

Furthermore, during Josephus' own lifetime Rome was being transformed by the Flavian

dynasty into a place and an administration that proclaimed the Roman victory over Jerusalem

through its public institutions and architecture. Previous victories over the Jews in Palestine had

been publicly celebrated,67 but the attention given to the Roman victory in 70 CE outstripped

them all. Triumphal arches commemorating Titus' victory in Jerusalem were set up, one at the

circular end of the Circus Maximus,68 and the other on Via Sacra on the slope of the Velia

(where it still stands). The extant arch displays in its inner panels the looting of the Jerusalem

temple and Titus riding in triumphal procession. These were, of course, not memorials of war in

the modern sense. They were public political statements. "War monuments that perpetuate

victory and glory are another means of converting military achievement into political power."69

In addition to these arches, according to the work of Alfoldy, the Flavian amphitheater originally




66 J. Price, 'The Provincial Historian in Rome', 105.
67 Coins proclaimed Pompey's victory, and Sosius celebrated a triumph in Rome after his
defeat of the Hasmonean Antigonus in 37 BCE, and the victory was proclaimed on coins and on
the Fasti Triumphales Capitolini inscription (CIL 1.2 (1893): 50, 70). D. Edwards, 'Religion,
Power, and Politics: Jewish Defeats by the Romans in Iconography and Josephus', in J. Overman
and R. MacLenna (eds.), Diaspora Jews and Judaism: Essays in Honor of and in Dialogue i ilh,
A. Thomas Kraabel (Atlanta 1992) 294-99.
68 This arch is no longer extant, but was dedicated in 81 CE. It is depicted on the Severan
Marble Plan of Rome and stood at least until the 9th century CE, for its inscription is recorded in
the manuscript known as the Anonymous Einsiedlensis (published in CIL VI.944), and its
foundations were discovered in modem excavations. See F. Millar, 'Last Year in Jerusalem:
Monuments of the Jewish War in Rome', in J. Edmondson et al (eds.), Flavius Josephus and
Flavian Rome (Oxford 2005) 120.
69 Holscher 15.









bore an inscription that proclaimed it had been built from the spoils of Jerusalem.70 An arch of

Isis also proclaimed the Roman victory.71 The spoils from the temple (specifically the golden

menorah and the table) were put on public display in Vespasian's new Temple of Peace, and the

temple torah scroll and purple wall hangings from the Jerusalem sanctuary were taken to his

palace.72 For the next 12 years Vespasian and Titus minted coins, which were circulated

throughout the empire, bearing the inscription IUDAEA CAPTA, and a new tax, for a newfiscus

ludaicus, was levied on Jews in place of the collection they had formerly taken up for the

Jerusalem temple.73 The tax funded the new temple of Jupiter Capitolinus and its yearly

collection reminded the Jews that the money once used for their own God was now being given

to a Roman deity. The destruction of Jerusalem provided a much-needed foundational myth for

the fledgling Flavian dynasty and allowed it to compare itself favorably to the first principate

that brought stability after a time of civil strife.74 While Rome conquered other places during this

period, no conquest was given as much resources or as much public attention as that of

Jerusalem. "... never had Jews as a nation and as an ethnos had to deal with symbolism that

singled out their defeat with consistent iconographic and rhetorical displays across the breadth of




70 G. Alfoldy, 'Eine Bauinschrift aus dem Colosseum', ZPE 109 (1993) 195-226. See
also L. Feldman, 'Financing the Colosseum', BibArchRev 27 (2001) 20-31, 60-1, which mostly
summarizes Alfoldy. The stone that originally bore the inscription is currently on display in the
gallery in the upper level of the Colosseum.
71 Edwards 304.
72 BJ 7.158-62.
73 BJ7.218; D.C. 66.7.2.
74 T. Barnes, 'The Sack of the Temple in Josephus and Tacitus', in J. Edmondson et al
(eds.), Flavius Josephus and Flavian Rome (Oxford 2005) 129.
75 While the conquest of Jerusalem was not the largest conflict the Romans ever engaged,
they did pour tremendous resources into it. It was arguably the longest siege against any city in
the first century CE (it lasted five months), and employed four legions, parts of two others,
twenty infantry cohorts, eight mounted regiments, and 18,000 foot soldiers supplied by client
kings. This was more than was sent for the invasion of Britain in 43 CE. Millar 101.









the Roman empire for the better part of twelve years."76 As much as 15 years after the event,

when Domitian needed to legitimize his reign, he turned once again to the conquest of Jerusalem

for political capital and re-issued the IUDAEA CAPTA coins to tie him to that great victory.

Reminders of the denigrated position of Jews in Roman eyes were, literally, all around Josephus.

His own experience was that Judaism was under exceptional pressure.

Conclusion

As I have shown in the previous chapter, expressions of ethnicity, especially literary ones,

are the result of a perceived crisis of identity and a sense of alienation. The need for self-esteem

and social acceptance is a powerful force in driving the creation of an ethnicity. So what was the

perceived crisis behind the literary works of Josephus? The answer, in short, was a wide-spread

anti-Jewish sentiment in the Greco-Roman world in which Josephus lived. This sentiment was,

for Josephus, recently further exacerbated by the humiliating defeat of the Jews by the Romans

in the First Jewish War, reminders of which were everywhere around him in Flavian Rome. The

Jews had become a veritable symbol of the uncooperative, and even hostile, foreigner whose

exclusion from the vitality, wealth, and power of the Roman world was considered just and right.

The Jews were subject to mistreatments of various kinds in the ancient world because they

were seen as outsiders who refused to demonstrate local civic pride and as a people whose

practices seemed judgmental against others or simply foreign. It would, of course, be a mistake

to think that the Jews were the only ethnic, social, or religious group who experienced such

mistreatments.78 There was in Josephus' day a general prejudice against all things and people

who did not conform to the Roman ideal, and this prejudice found expression in various ways.



76 Edwards 306.
77 Goodman, "Josephus as Roman Citizen," 338.
78 Sevenster, The Roots of Pagan Anti-Semitism, 42-48.









For example, the senate expelled some Greek philosophers from Rome in 162 and 155 BCE,79 as

did Nero in 65 CE, 80 Vespasian in 72 CE,81 and Domitian in 90 CE82 and again in 93 CE.83

Political interests manipulated the personal fears or paranoia of the emperors, and criticisms of

the emperors were treated harshly.84 But the fact that the Jews were not alone in being perceived

as cultural misfits does not diminish the nature of what they experienced.

The situation of the Jews in the Hellenistic world was complicated by the fact that

perceptions of the Jews and their place in that world were different on the "inside" (majority)

than they were on the "outside." The insiders, the client peoples of the Roman empire who

worshipped the traditional gods of Greece and Rome and who acknowledged the imperium

Romanum, saw Jews in an either/or way: they could be Jews (i.e., practice Judaism), or they

could assimilate themselves into Greco-Roman society and culture, along with the identity it

implied, but they could not do both. It was assumed that Judaism and full participation in

Hellenism were opposites. From the ancient texts we hear no overtures from the pagans to the

Jews, inviting them or instructing them how to become part of their world. What we hear instead

from the "insiders" is a constant rehearsal of stereotypes and negative images that shouted "stay

away." Full Jewish participation in the institutions that marked off Greek and Roman identity

was considered impossible. The nature of the Jewish people and their religion made it so,

according to the "insiders." There were, of course, proselytes, and some of them were even


79 Gruen, The Hellenistic World and the Coming ofRome, 257.
80 Tac. Ann. 15.71.
81 D.C. 65.9.
82 This first banishment is implied by Dio Cassius' statement in 67.13 that Domitian
banished philosophers again. It probably occurred in connection with the conspiracy of
Saturninus. J. Toynbee, 'Dictators and Philosophers in the First Century A.D.', G&R 13 (1944)
58.
83 D.C. 67.13; Suet. Dom. 10.2; Aulus Gellius 15.11.4. See R. Harte, 'The Praetorship of
the Younger Pliny', JRS 25 (1935) 53.
84 Toynbee 43-58.









influential or well-known people. On the whole, however, their presence does not mitigate the

general exclusion Jews faced from society. One of the great driving forces at work in this tension

was the connection between culture and religion. As long as the Jews had a different God and a

different understanding of the relationship between religion and secular culture, and refused to

acknowledge in any meaningful way the gods of the Greeks and Romans, getting "inside" was

going to be impossible. Josephus, however, was convinced that one of the problems was that the

Greeks and Romans fundamentally misunderstood Judaism and its God, and he wrote the

Antiquitates Judaicae to explain it properly. In approaching the problem from the standpoint of

overcoming misunderstandings, Josephus had landed on one of the fundamental aspects of that

problem85 and was taking a positive track and going beyond mere apologetics.






















85 On the role of cultural dissonance in the tensions between Jews and Romans, see S.
Stern, 'Dissonance and Misunderstanding in Jewish-Roman Relations', in M. Goodman (ed.),
Jews in a Graeco-Roman World (Oxford 1998) 241-50. In ancient times it seems that, in spite of
much contact, there was little real understanding of other cultures outside of one's own. J.
Teixidor, 'Interpretations and Misinterpretations of the East in Hellenistic Times', in P. Bilde et
al (eds.), Religion and Religious Practice in the Seleucid Kingdom (Studies in Hellenistic
Civilization 1, Aarhus 1990) 66-78.









CHAPTER 4
HELLENISTIC CULTURE AND JEWISH ACCULTURATION

In the previous chapter I explored several lines of evidence that shows that Jews were,

generally, objects of contempt in Roman Hellenistic culture at large. The kind of crisis that

would typically give rise to some kind of attempt at, or assertion of, self-definition was in place.

But did the Jews feel compelled by this crisis to respond in this way? Is there any indication that

Jews wanted to fit into the Hellenistic culture around them? Is there evidence to suggest that they

cared to be seen as "insiders"? The answer is that the Jews were not only eager to fit in, but they

had also been trying this very thing for a long time when Josephus arrived on the scene. Josephus

shared the hopes of many of his fellow-Jews, that they could negotiate a respected place within

the culture of his day, and the ethnographic, or ethnicity-creating, character of his writings was

yet another attempt to achieve this. Josephus was actually participating in, and advancing, a

long-standing project among Jews in the ancient world.

If all we had were the statements of outsiders about how Jews refused to assimilate into the

society at large in their day, we might think that the Jews resisted assimilation in every facet of

their lives, for the outsiders typically complained of how Jews remained (in their perception)

aloof from Hellenistic culture in critical ways. However, the fact is that Jews in various places

attempted assimilation into Greco-Roman society to varying degrees and on a broad scale. The

evidence leads us to ask not if the Jews had tried to be Hellenistic, but instead the extent to which

Jews in ancient times assimilated Hellenistic institutions as markers of their own identity.

The Question of Jewish Hellenization

By terms such as "Hellenism," "Hellenistic," and "Hellenization" I mean what Hengel

said, "a complex phenomena which cannot be limited to purely political, socio-economic,









cultural or religious aspects, but embraces them all,"1 and further "it cannot be restricted to

Greekpaideia, philosophy and rhetoric, even less to syncretism and mystery religions."2 This fits

well with Friedman's description: "Hellenism is not simply about the spread of Greek cultural

forms to Asia. It is about conquest and the establishment and transformation of political and

economic structures in a wide region. It is, not least, about the colonial establishment of Greeks

in Asia and the consequences of this phenomenon for cultural change."3 It was a pervasive

influence4 of the Greek culture on the cultures of the Orient, but this influence did not displace

native traditions. Grabbe summarizes

Hellenization was a long and complex phenomenon. It cannot be summarized in a word or
a sentence. It was not just the adoption of Greek ways by the inhabitants of the ancient
Near East or of Oriental ways by Greeks who settled in the East. Hellenistic civilization
was sui generis and must be considered from a variety of points of view, for it concerned
many different areas of life: language, custom, religion, commerce, architecture, dress,
government, literary and philosophical ideals. Hellenization represented a process as well
as a description of a type of culture.5

Levine casts the net a little wider:

Hellenization constituted more than simply the dissemination of Greek social mores,
language, and institutions throughout the East; .... What took place was a much a process
of selection, adoption, and adaptation as it was of conquest and subjugation. Moreover,
without denying the dominant role of Greek civilization, we should recognize that
Hellenization was far more complex than merely the impact of the West on the East. ....




1 Hengel, Judaism and Hellenism 3.
2 M. Hengel, 'Judaism and Hellenism Revisited', in J. Collins and G. Sterling (eds.),
Hellenism in the Land ofIsrael (Notre Dame 2001) 9.
3 J. Friedman, 'Notes on Culture and Identity', 25.
4 Some scholars (such as W. Tar, Hellenistic Civilization (London 1947)) thought of
Hellenism as a dominance of Greek culture and institutions, but this is not necessary to the idea
of Hellenism.
5 L. Grabbe, 'The Jews and Hellenization: Hengel and His Critics', loudaios <
ftp://ftp.lehigh.edu/pub/listserv/ioudaios-l/Articles/lghellen > 15 May 2006. The idea of
Hellenization was coined by J. Droysen in Geschichte des Hellenismus (2 aufl., Gotha 1877-78).
Debate continues over whether Hellenism produced a melting-pot of cultures or a two-tiered
society.









In this light, therefore, Hellenization is ... the interplay of a wide range of cultural forces
on an oikoumene defined in large part-but not exclusively-by the Greek conquests of
the fourth and third centuries B.C.E.6

What is important for this study is that the kind of acculturation that happened in Hellenization

"is primarily a process of change in identity and not simply a question of the learning of codes."7

Hellenization entailed much more than simply learning the Greek language, doing public

construction with Greek architectural models, etc. It involved a redefinition of many peoples on

many levels.

Any inquiry into the phenomenon of Hellenization among the Jews of antiquity is

complicated by at least three factors. First, there is the diversity within ancient Judaism itself.

Most scholars today prefer to speak of the Judaisms of antiquity rather than portray Judaism as a

monolithic, homogeneous thing. Pearce and Jones summarize the position of modern scholarship

well by saying

We have seen a move away from the understanding of Judaism and Jewish identity as
normative, homogeneous phenomena, .... Notions of 'essence' and homogeneity have
been abandoned and an alternative model has been widely adopted which stresses the
existence of a plurality of Judaisms and Jewish identities in antiquity that made up
complex and variegated social phenomena in both the Land of Israel and the Diaspora.8

Various sects existed within ancient Judaism, and these sects had different views, sometimes

widely different, on a range of topics from Hellenistic acculturation to the prospects of the

liberation of Palestine from Roman rule. Each group had different responses to the question of

what defined a Jew, and each had different agendas for the nation. And certainly, individuals

6 L. Levine, Judaism and Hellenism in Antiquity (Peabody 1998) 18-19.
7 Friedman, 'Notes on Culture and Identity', 25.
8 P. 15. See also M. Smith, 'Palestinian Judaism in the First Century', in M. Davis (ed.),
Israel: Its Role in Civilization (New York 1956) 68-78. This understanding is a product of the
nature of the evidence and not of the claims made in the evidence. When ancient Jewish authors
wrote of Judaism, "they tended to assume that there was only one Judaism" (i.e., theirs). M
Goodman, 'Jews and Judaism in the Mediterranean Diaspora in the Late-Roman Period: The
Limitations of the Evidence', in C. Bakhos (ed.), Ancient Judaism in its Hellenistic Context
(SupJSJ 95, Leiden 2005) 182.









within each group did not agree with each other in every detail of their shared attitudes or in their

level of conviction concerning them. This phenomenon is a function of the fact that ethnicities

are chosen by a people and not inherent to them. It is not even clear from the extant materials if

any of the ancient Jewish sects represented the theological views of the average Palestinian Jew

(the am ha-aretz).9 The variety within ancient Judaism therefore makes it impossible to speak of

ancient Jewish ethnicity or the adoption of ethnic markers in such a way that would describe all

Jews of antiquity.

The second factor is the varying degrees with which Jews had contact with Hellenism in

different places. Jerusalem and its firmly entrenched customs provided a strong resistance to

Hellenism. Once outside of Jerusalem and its immediate environs, one could find significant

contact with Hellenism mediated through Roman imperialism in places within Palestine such as

Caesarea Maritima or Sebaste. However, we should not suppose that Palestine was as thoroughly

Romanized as it is sometimes thought. Even in Galilee in the north, the fact is that evidence of

widespread Romanization in the first century is lacking until after the outbreak of the First

Jewish War.10 Outside of Palestine rabbinic influence was probably not great1 and the Roman

mediation of Hellenism for Jews was generally more powerful and successful.12





9 M. Smith 68-73.
10 See M. Chancey, Greco-Roman Culture and the Galilee of Jesus (SNTSMS 134,
Cambridge 2005) 221-9; A. Berlin, 'Romanization and anti-Romanization in pre-Revolt Galilee',
in A. Berlin and J. Overman (eds.), The First Jewish Revolt: Archaeology, History, and Ideology
(London 2002) 69.
11 M. Goodman, 'Jews and Judaism in the Mediterranean Diaspora', 178-9.
12 Even here, however, we must guard against supposing that the differences were drastic.
"... the religion and theology of the Jews seems to have been basically the same character in
Palestine and in the Diaspora. ... Of course, the absence of the Temple in the Diaspora caused
the cultic, ritual and religious life to be different." P. Bilde, 'The Jews in the Diaspora of the
Roman Empire', Nordisk Judaistik. .kA, \i. hlit ',vi t Jewish Studies 13 (1992) 117.









The third factor is the differing attitudes of Jews in various places toward the culture

around them. The fact is that, within the groups that constituted ancient Judaism, many voices

were competing to be heard concerning the relationship of Jews to Greco-Roman society at

large. The Jewish literature of the Hellenistic period13 shows much diversity when it comes to

attitudes toward Gentiles and their cultures. The provenance, purpose, and intended audience of

much of this literature is sometimes hard to ascertain, and thus we may only speak of the

propagandistic or apologetic functions of this literature provisionally. It does seem, however,

judging from the volume and diversity of literature that has survived, that Jewish authors

believed they could inform and persuade their fellow-Jews to adopt some particular aspect of

self-understanding. The diversity of the surviving literature thus again suggests that the

boundaries of Jewish ethnicity in ancient times were debated and not fixed.

These factors resulted in a situation that was in no way uniform in every place for every

Jew. As noted above, the ancient world was a world in which forces of assimilation operated

powerfully. These forces were so strong that Bohak has argued that it is not possible to speak of

any kind of ethnic continuity among diaspora Jews. If it existed, he claims, it was the exception,

not the rule.14 This seems, to me, an overstatement, or perhaps an overly narrow use of the term

"continuity." Most, if not all, Jews were apparently influenced by Hellenism in some way,15 and

most, if not all, Jews were comfortable with some degree of Hellenization, and they still

considered themselves Jews by some set of standards even if the assimilation and acculturation

was not uniform in every place where Jews lived.




13 It suffices for this study to restrict our use of this terminology to Jewish literature that
was written in Greek.
14 Bohak 175, 191.
15 So V. Tcherikover, Hellenistic Civilization and the Jews (New York 1977).









Most notably, Jews in many places used the Greek language, even if they continued to use

a local or native language alongside it. As noted in chapter two, language can serve as an ethnic

indicium. Accordingly, adoption of the Greek language by ancient Jews was more than just a

concession to the political and economic realities around them. Admittedly, some facility in

Greek was necessary for commerce and communication with foreign magistrates, so use of the

Greek language by itself would not necessarily comprise evidence of Hellenization among Jews.

It is, however, evidence when viewed in the larger context in which other elements of Greek

culture were also adopted into Jewish culture. In that larger context it indicated a degree of

acceptance of Hellenism and a desire to be counted as part of that social world. The strength of

this fact is more obvious when we contrast the scene in 2 Maccabees 7.8, where one of the seven

brothers voiced his refusal to eat pig's flesh u T CarpLC
and in Second Jewish War, the Bar-Kochba Revolt (132-135 AD), when the leaders of the revolt

mandated the used of Hebrew as an expression of nationalistic solidarity.16 Similarly, in Luke's

Acts (14.8-18) we hear of the people of Lystra in the interior of Asia Minor speaking in the

Lycaonian language, not Greek, and Paul chose to address a hostile Jewish crowd in Jerusalem in

Aramaic (21.40), not Greek. In some contexts, choice of language reflected a conscious ethnic

identification.

A command of the Greek language was necessary at a minimum for anyone who wished to

carve out a place for themselves in the Hellenistic world, and refusal to use the language

indicated a rejection of Hellenism to some extent and a preference for some other ethnic






16 A. Berlin and J. Overman, 'Introduction', in A. Berlin and J. Overman (eds.), The First
Jewish Revolt: Archaeology, History, and Ideology (London 2002) 10.









tradition.17 Hengel notes that "anyone who sought social respect or even the reputation of being

an educated man had to have an impeccable command of it. The word k~XX viL'EL primarily

meant 'speak Greek correctly', and only secondarily 'adopt a Greek style of life'. Impeccable

command of the Greek language was the most important qualification for taking over Greek

culture."18 Diodorus Siculus could say in the mid-first century BCE EupUPXXEcaL 6' aiUrTr Kac

Trrp6 XO6you 6U5LvqLV, ou KCUXXLOV 'ETepOV OUK &V TL pq65LG EUijpOL. TO&U0 y&p ol 4ev "EXXTrVE(

TG(V P PPUp'POv, ol 6( TrETrUX6LE~UL voL T )v dTraUL6EU6)v TrpoieouoL, Trp6c 65 TOUT Lo 6& 40dvou

To6Uou 6wvadr6v EorLv eva 'w V TTOXX&)v TrEpLyevEoOaL ("But it [history] also contributes to the

power of speech, and one cannot easily find another, better thing than that. For in this matter the

Greeks surpass the barbarians, and the educated surpass the uneducated, and by this power alone

one man is able to rise above the many").19 Similarly, the LXX was produced initially not for

pagans, but for the Jews of Alexandria who were so immersed in Greek culture that many of

them could not read their Scriptures in the original Hebrew.20 The fact that the Hebrew

Scriptures now took on Greek dress is significant. The Alexandrian Jews were presenting

themselves, by means of the LXX, as a people whose religion was not foreign to the Hellenistic

world around them.21 There is a scholarly consensus that many Palestinian Jews were conversant






17 Cf the fact that the Roman senate did not allow anyone to address it in any language
other than Latin, or that L. Aemilius Pallus delivered Rome's terms to Amphipolis (at the end of
the Third Macedonia War) in Latin even though his Greek was impeccable (Livy 45.29.3). This
was a conscious distancing of themselves from Greek culture. Gruen, The Hellenistic World and
the Coming of Rome 267.
18 Hengel, Judaism and Hellenism 58.
19 1.2.5-6.
20 P. Green, Alexander to Actium: The Historical evolution of the Hellenistic Age
(Hellenistic Culture and Society 9, Berkeley 1990) 317.
21 CPJI.41f.









in Greek as well.22 Jews of the Diaspora were taking Greek names since the third century BCE,

documents in Greek were among those found in the Jewish manuscript caches at Qumran,

Murabbat, Nahal Hever, Nahal Seelim, Nahal Mishmar, the so-called Cave of the Letters, and

Masada, and hundreds of Greek inscriptions of Jewish origin (funerary inscriptions, ostraca, etc.)

have been found both in Palestine and in the Diaspora.23 The widespread use of Greek by Jews in

antiquity should thus be interpreted as an indicator of their willingness to be understood to some

extent along the lines of Greek culture.

While it might be easy to think of the situation of the ancient Jews vis-a-vis Hellenism as

creating an either/or proposition for them, this does not appear to have been the case even in

Palestine where Jewish nationalism flared up at times. Concerning Palestinian Jews, the

landmark study of Hengel, Judaism andHellenism, challenged any such dichotomy. Many

ancient Jews apparently did not see themselves as caught between being Jewish on the one hand,

or compromising their Jewishness and adopting Hellenistic culture on the other hand. Hengel

argued that the Hellenization of Jews in Palestine was a long process that had begun even before

the conquests of Alexander and that resulted, by the first century, in a thorough saturation of

Greek culture among Jews throughout the ancient world. He asserted that "the usual distinction

between Palestinian and Hellenistic Judaism needs to be corrected. ... From about the middle of

the third century BC all Judaism must really be designated 'Hellenistic Judaism' in the strict

sense ...." 24 Another way of saying this is that the evidence seems to suggest that the ancient

Jews readily found in Hellenism new means for self-definition. The thoroughness of the



22 See J. Sevenster, Do You Know Greek? (Leiden 1968), and J. Fitzmyer, 'Languages of
Palestine in the First Century A.D.', CBQ 32 (1970) 501-31.
23 G. Mussies, 'Greek in Palestine and the Diaspora', in S. Safrai and M Stern (eds.), The
Jewish People in the First Century (CRINT 1.2, Philadelphia 1976) 1042-51.
24 Hengel, Judaism and Hellenism 104.









Hellenization of the ancient Jews suggests that they were eager to find a place for themselves in

the broader Hellenistic culture.

Hengel's picture of ancient Judaism stirred scholarly debate,25 but generally it has

prevailed. Yet it does seem that Hengel went too far in parts of his thesis. For example, in

making his case for pervasive Hellenization of the ancient Jews, Hengel downplayed the

difference between Palestinian Judaism and the Jews of the Diaspora. This was a methodological

mistake that blurred the great amount of diversity that actually appeared within Judaism. A better

corrective to Hengel's picture of a massive, thorough penetration of Hellenism into Judaism

(including in Palestine) is the study by Green, Alexander to Actium: The Historical Evolution of

the Hellenistic Age, where he argues that Hellenism did not spread evenly or even easily

throughout the areas affected by Alexander's conquests. Instead, Green argues, Alexander

succeeded in establishing pockets or islands of Hellenism, and Hellenistic influence on

surrounding non-Greek cultures was often met with varying degrees of acceptance, if not with

resistance. It would not be accurate to think that people in remote areas were regularly

conversant in Greek or adopted Greek culture.

Although Hengel's conclusions need to be nuanced more, it seems unavoidable that

Hellenism indeed made inroads, sometimes substantial ones, into many quarters of Judaism. This

became more apparent as one moved away from Palestine and into territory that was not the

Jewish homeland. In fact, the majority of Jews in ancient times lived and flourished outside of



25 Most notably by L. Feldman, 'Hengel's Judaism and Hellenism in Retrospect', JBL 96
(1977) 371-82; his Jew and Gentile in the Ancient World; and his 'How Much Hellenism in the
Land of Israel?', JSJ33 (2002) 290-313; and by A. Momigliano, in his review of Hengel's book,
'Hengel, M. "Judentum und Hellenismus: Studien zu ihrer Begegnung unter besonderer
Berucksichtigung Palatinas bis zur Mitte des 2. Jh. v. Ch.".', JTS n.s. 21 (1970) 151. Momigliano
called for a more judicious treatment of the phenomenon in his Alien Wisdom: The Limits of
Hellenization (Cambridge 1975).









Jerusalem in the Diaspora, where Hellenism was the culture. Generally, the current scholarly

discussion is not about the possibility of Hellenistic influence on Judaism (including in

Palestine), but about the level of penetration. Gruen has argued that there is, in the thinking of

some, a simplistic dichotomy of "either resistance to assimilation and longing for Jerusalem, or

conformity to and embrace of the alien environment" and that this dichotomy

did not face the Jews who dwelled in Greco-Roman communities in the Second Temple
period. ... The Jews abroad had chosen there residence voluntarily and (in many cases) had
been there for generations. They had no cause to ache for Jerusalem. Nor, by contrast, were
they obliged to adopt a new guise and sacrifice their identity to blend in with their
surroundings.26

He goes on to note that

We can therefore abandon simplistic dichotomies. Diaspora Jews did not huddle in
enclaves, isolated and oppressed, clinging to a heritage under threat. Nor did they
assimilate to the broader cultural and political world, compromising their past, ignoring the
homeland, and reckoning the Book (in Greek) as surrogate for the Temple. The stark
alternatives obscure understanding. A complex set of circumstances, diverse and dependent
on local conditions, produced a mixed, ambiguous, and varied picture.27

As I noted above, as one moved away from Palestine, Hellenistic influence was much

more apparent in the Jews of the Diaspora than among the Palestinian Jews. In the Diaspora we

see a wide range of assimilation and accommodation to Greek culture. Thus

There is growing recognition that Jews in antiquity experienced very different social and
political conditions, and correspondingly engaged in their local political, social and
cultural environments in many different ways. Several recent studies of the Jewish
communities of the Diaspora generally indicate that there is good evidence for many Jews
integrating at a local level and expressing a real sense of identification with the local
environment while maintaining their Jewish identity.28








26 E. Gruen, Diaspora: Jews Amidst Greeks andRomans (Cambridge 2002) 5.
27 E. Gruen, Diaspora 6.
28 Pearce and Jones 17.









Within Palestine, the aristocracy was the group most interested in Hellenism partly because it

offered them a means of maintaining their economic status.29 At the same time it seems correct

to recognize that there were some substantial differences between the Judaism of Palestine and

that of the Diaspora,30 without falling into the false either/or dichotomy of a normalized Judaism

(Palestine) versus a compromised Judaism (in the Diaspora). It would not be an

oversimplification to say that Jerusalem was the greatest pocket of conservative or orthodox

Judaism in the ancient world, but this does not mean that one would regularly encounter Jews

who were not zealous for their religion outside of Jerusalem. The difference between Palestinian

Judaism and Diaspora Judaism was not the religion, the zeal for the religion, the purity of the

religion, etc. The difference may be better described as lying in the approach to and construction

of the ethnicity, and the choices of what would count as ethnic indicia. Concerning the presence

and power of Hellenism, however, there is no doubt. The question is not if Hellenism penetrated

Palestine, but instead the question is one of how much resistance did a particular person or group

offer to it31 and how a Jew or a local group of Jews managed their self-understanding, how they

constructed their ethnicities, in light of it.

Hellenization had occurred even among Palestinian Jews, yet at the same time we must

recognize that the religious criterion always played a powerful role in their lives and ethnic self-

understanding. That dominance of religious concerns did not, however, prevent even Palestinian

Jews from absorbing Hellenism to a great degree. Jerusalem itself bore many marks of

Hellenization in the first century. Levine's survey of the evidence led him to conclude that "The



29 Hengel, Judaism andHellenism 1.56. Surely we must attribute much of Josephus' own
affection for Hellenism to his association with the aristocracy.
30 J. Collins, 'Cult and Culture: The Limits of Hellenization in Judea', in J. Collins and G.
Sterling (eds.), Hellenism in the Land of srael (Notre Dame 2001) 52.
31 Feldman, Jew and Gentile in the Ancient World 44.









impact of Hellenism on the Near East in general, and on Judaea and Jerusalem in particular, was

considerable."32

The origins of the Hellenization of the capital city of Jerusalem have proven to be a

controversial topic in modem scholarship. Some questions about the so-called Seleucid

enforcement of Hellenization are still open.33 However, even the Jewish account in 2 Maccabees

reveals that Hellenization was not initially forced upon the Jews by the Seleucids, but that Jason

(note the Greek name), out of personal ambition to become high priest, bargained with Antiochus

IV to secure the priesthood and to turn Jerusalem into a Hellenistic city. The bargain involved a

promise of a substantial increase in tribute revenues from the Jews to the Seleucid king-an

additional 440 talents of silver, with another 150 to come if permission was granted to build a

gymnasium-and enrolled the men of Jerusalem as citizens of the capital city, Antioch.34 The

author of 2 Maccabees clearly was not pleased with Jason. He reported that

TIv 6' oimUU aKt.r TL0K 'EAXXTIVL[Oto KMcL Trp6op3ooL UXXO OuXLO[LOI 6L& Tiiv ToU U'oCEPOu KUc
OUK U(PXLEPEWG 'ICaowvoc UTrEPP.AXX.ouocv avaLyvELaV U(OTE rlKETiL TrEpi T ( TOU
9)OLUoirpoi) L(-oXELTOpyLX( TrpoOUtLOui E[VcL UTOi) [lEp .LXXcL TOt) Le-v vEG) KXTUI))povoUVrtE
KUCL TU(V OUOL(V c&4EXOUVTE 'E oTrEU6oV 4UE'TXELV Tf( Ev' TrcXaL aXOTUp1 Trapavco0ou xoprlyni(X
ET(& T:rV TO) 61 OKOU Trp6OKXTOLV

("There was such a high degree of Hellenization ('EXXr11Lot6() and increase in the
adoption of foreign ways (&XX0ouXLo[L6;) because of the surpassing wickedness of Jason,
who was impious and not high priest [legitimately], that the priests were no longer intent
upon their service at the altar, but despising the sanctuary and neglecting the sacrifices,
they hastened to participate in the unlawful spectacle in the wrestling arena after the
invitation to the discus.")35

The author of 2 Maccabees thought that Jason's predecessor, Onias, was a model of

righteousness, and he has imposed a religious overlay upon the politics of the situation. Yet even


32 Levine 38.
33 cf E. Gruen, 'Hellenism and Persecution: Antiochus IV and the Jews', in P. Green
(ed.), Hellenistic History and Culture (Berkeley 1993) 238-73.
34 2 Mac 4:8-9.
35 2 Mac 4:13-14.









this anti-Hellenistic author conceded that at first Hellenism was not forced upon the Jews. It was

Jason's idea, not that of the Seleucids.

Interestingly, the author of 1 Maccabees was pro-Roman and anti-Greek. He described a

Jewish delegation to Rome saying

Ui EIrEXEwrTO Iou56a O6v Euir6otXeov Uo[bv IUavvou To6 AKKG) KCL 'IUoova uLbv
EXEUCccpou KCL T Eo'rTELXEV XIU)TOib ELd 'P5t.rl1v oTiFTOCL (LXcCv KUCL aouviticXiav KUCL TOi 6pcaL
Tbv Cuy6v TTr' abULov OUL eL6OV TTiV pcFOLXELcV u;v 'EXX'vov KaXTa6OuXou[)Evoui T6bv
IopCLFPi 6oulXEL

("So Judas chose Eupolemus the son of John, son of Accos, and Jason the son of Eleazar,
and sent them to Rome to establish friendship and alliance, and to free themselves from the
yoke; for they saw that the kingdom of the Greeks was completely enslaving Israel.")36

But the authors of these books are giving an opinion of Hellenization that, as far as we can tell,

proceeded with no opposition in Jason's own day. There are no reports of contemporary riots or

dissentions over Jason's initiatives,37 and none of the Jewish literature written shortly after the

event criticized the initiative.38 The books of Maccabees look back at that time with disdain and

identified Jason's behavior as a horrible mistake, but that is a later perspective, and it cannot be

identified as a majority view. Ironically, the books of the Maccabees were written in Greek.39

Problems came when another contender for the priesthood, Menelaus, offered Antiochus a

greater sum for the priesthood, effectively out-bidding Jason. Antiochus agreed, and to raise the

money Menelaus took vessels from the Jerusalem temple and sold them in the markets near Tyre

(2 Mac 4:23-42). This caused rioting in Jerusalem. Apparently the Jews of Jason's day were able

to distinguish between civic elements (ethnic indicia) of their identity and religious elements

36 I Mac 8:17-18.
37 L. Grabbe, 'The Hellenistic City of Jerusalem', in J. Bartlett (ed.), Jews in the
Hellenistic and Roman Cities (London 2002) 13.
38 J. Goldstein, 'Jewish Acceptance and Rejection of Hellenism', in E. Sanders (ed.),
Jewish and Christian Self-Definition: Volume Two: Aspects of Judaism in the Graeco-Roman
Period (Philadelphia 1981) 81.
39 1 Maccabees was originally written in Hebrew, but that text did not survive antiquity.
What survived was the Greek translation. Goldstein 18.









(ethnic criteria) without difficulty. Stealing from the temple crossed the line, but Hellenizing the

city did not. When Menelaus made his power play, Antiochus was away (in 168 BC, fighting in

Egypt). With the Syrian ruler away, the riots over Menelaus' looting of the temple encouraged

Jason to retake his position by force. When Antiochus returned to Palestine, he saw what looked

like a general revolt, and it is at this point that the Seleucid king began to forbid the practice of

Judaism. It was not long after this that the Maccabean War for independence began. However,

the problem is far too camplex to describe with the simple solution that Jason's introduction of

Hellenism was the cause, as the authors of I and 2 Maccabees have postulated.40 Again,

however, the problem was not that the Jews of Jerusalem were opposed to Hellenization, but that

they jealously and zealously valued their ancestral worship. Only when Hellenization interfered

with that did the Jews revolt. Otherwise some notable monuments in Jerusalem were built in this

time, namely the tomb of the Bene Hezir in Jerusalem's Kidron Valley, and Jason's tomb west of

the city, both featuring Doric architectural style, and Hasmonean coins were minted bearing

symbols common in the Hellenistic world at the time-except there are no images of living

beings.41

Within Palestine, a good indicator of the extent of Jewish Hellenization into the time of

Josephus is the nature of the client kingdom of Herod the Great, who ruled from 40-1 BCE.42

Herod filled Palestine with Hellenistic material culture.43 Three notable examples were the cities



40 N. Hyldahl, 'The Maccabean Rebellion and the Question of "Hellenization"', in P.
Bilde et al (eds.), Religion and Religious Practice in the Seleucid Kingdom (Studies in
Hellenistic Civilization 1, Aarhus 1990) 194.
41 Levine 44.
42 I am here using the revised dates of J. Finegan, Handbook of Biblical Chronology (rev.
edn., Peabody 1998) 291-300. Others put the death of Herod at 4 BCE.
43 Hellenism was not the only influence on Herodian architecture, for Herod was also
affected by his affinities for the cultures of Rome and the east. But "Hellenistic architecture was
obviously the most vigorous cultural determinant on Herod's buildings." P. Richardson, Building









of Caesarea Maritima, Banias, and Sebaste (formerly Samaria). All three cities had temples

either pagan deities, to Rome, or to Augustus in the first century.44 Caesarea Maritima was only

about 60 miles from Jerusalem, and there was a significant Jewish population there, enough that

an offense against the Jews of Caesarea Maritima is cited by Josephus as the event that started

the Revolt of 66 CE.45 However, Caesarea Maritima looked so much like a Greek city that the

Gentile inhabitants argued that it belonged to them, and cited as proof the presence of statues and

temples which Jews would not have built.46 The temple to Augustus at Banias closely resembled

a temple to Augustus at Pola.47 Most interesting is the fact that Herod especially concentrated on

making the capital city of Jerusalem as Hellenistic as he could. In Jerusalem itself he built pools,

and a theater (possibly out of wood48). This theater was adorned with inscriptions honoring

Caesar and was the site of athletic games, involving contests between animals and condemned

prisoners, in honor of Augustus on a five year cycle. According to Josephus, Herod tried his best

to make the games equal in prestige with those that were celebrated in other parts of the empire




Jewish in the Roman East (Waco 2004) 226-7. See also G. Foerster, 'Art and Architecture in
Palestine', in S. Safrai and M. Stern (eds.), The Jewish People in the First Century (CRINT 1.2,
Philadelphia 1976) 971-1006.
44 At Banias, the temple to Zeus Heliopolitanus was built near the end of the first century
CE. A temple to Pan and the nymphs had been built near it in the earlier part of the first century
CE. Herod the Great also built a temple to Augustus there in 19 BCE. Josephus BJ 1.404-6; AJ
15.359, 363-4. See A. Berlin, 'Where Was Herod's Temple to Augustus?', BibArchRev 29
(2003) 22-4. Caesarea Maritima had a temple to Rome and Augustus sitting atop a prominent
platform facing the harbor. Josephus mentions it in AJ 15.339; BJ 1.417. See R. Bull, 'Caesarea
Maritima: The Search for Herod's City,' BibArchRev 8 (1982) 24-41. A temple of Augustus
stood at Sebaste, the stairs and platform of which are still there. BJ 1.403; AJ 15.298. See D.
Barag, 'King Herod's Royal Castle at Samaria-Sebaste', Palestine Exploration Quarterly 125
(1993)4-8.
45 BJ2:282ff
46 BJ 2.266.
47 D. Jacobson, 'Herod's Roman Temple', BibArchRev 28 (2002) 18-27.
48 See J. Patrich, 'Herod's Theater in Jerusalem-A New Proposal', Israel Exploration
Journal 52 (2002) 231-9.









by offering large prizes by which he hoped to attract the most well-known athletes of the day.49

He also built an amphitheater somewhere outside the city5 and rebuilt the citadel north of the

temple and renamed it the Antonia.51 All of this gave an unmistakably strong Hellenistic, and

especially Roman, flavor to the city.52

Herod's renovation of Jerusalem aroused some complaints among the local inhabitants.

Just as it had been in the days of the Maccabean revolt, the Jerusalem Jews still drew a line

between the two spheres of culture and cult.53 Many Jews were tolerant of many Greek things in

their local cultures, but they were especially sensitive and resistant to anything that was

perceived as a threat to or compromise of the exclusive worship of their ancestral God, Yahweh,

and hence to their identity as Jews. Josephus prefaces his account of these things saying AL&

TOUTO KL i&XXOV EE-'iULEv,'eV TVU'v TXTpi)v e- ;v KUcL tEVLKOL( E'TLTT6EU ljuacLV i)TT6L&e(ELpEv Tiiv

TrcXaL KUU(J'T(OJLV XTraPEYXELPTprTov oVUaOv EV cWv o0 ,LKp( KUCL Trpoc TOyV aU OL Xp6vov

r6LKiO r4lEV a&LEXTrOivrv Voa Trp6~opov EirL Trv EUJopepLaV Tiyev Toi)b 6XOou n ("On account of

this he departed even more from the ancestral customs, and through foreign pursuits he gradually

corrupted the ancient way of life that was inviolable; from which things we were harmed not a

little and at a later time as well, as whatever things that formerly led the masses to piety were




49 AJ 15.268-70.
50 Possibly the same as the hippodrome mentioned in BJ2.44 and AJ 17.255.
51 BJ 1.401. See the list of Herod's buildings in P. Richardson, Herod. King of the Jews
andFriend of the Romans (Columbia 1996) 197-202. From this same time is the non-Herodian,
but still Hellenistic, so-called tomb of Absalom dated to the first century CE and featuring
engaged Ionic columns. L. Rahmani, 'Ancient Jerusalem's Funerary Customs and Tombs: Part
Three', Biblical Archaeologist 45 (1982) 47.
52 Yet we should be careful to distinguish Herod's use of Hellenistic architectural models
from the idea that Herod was acting as an agent for Hellenization. Richardson, Building Jewish,
238.
53 Collins, 'Cult and Culture', 55. As I have suggested, however, the Jews did not always
agree about where the line was to be drawn.









being neglected.").54 Josephus thought the Hellenization of the city had, in some areas, gone too

far so as to corrupt Jewish religious values, which in turn led to a general impiety towards their

God.55 Nor was he alone in this view. He reports that the locals complained that having athletic

contests between wild animals or between animals and men was clearly contrary to Jewish

customs. daoepPec [Ev y&p EK Trpo6 'Xou KarTeaLveo OrlpLOL ; &vepTrrouv iUTroppLTrTrLV EiTr TpjEL

Trif &vOpGpTrG)v Oka dUoEep'e 65 EVLKOiL ETTLT16E65UaCoLV E XaX&TTELv Toib( iLoLGo6v ("For it

appeared as blatant impiety to throw men to wild beasts for the enjoyment of men as spectators,

and also as impiety to change their customs for foreign practices").56 Just how strong this

protection of Jewish identity markers was in Jerusalem became clear when the trophies for these

contests were displayed in public. To many of the locals, they appeared to be presented as

objects of worship containing human likenesses on standards adorned with weapons, which [ti1

TrUTpLov TIv abrTOt T& TOLCMUTC oepeLV ("it was not their ancestral practice to venerate such

things").57 When it became clear that these had provoked significant consternation, Herod invited

a dialogue, the purpose of which Josephus saw as trying to persuade them to abandon their

religious convictions (KaL TrTaprIyopeEL T i 6ELLOL6aL[LoVL u &caLpoLevo.vO).58 It turns out that they

were not images at all, and only when they inspected the trophies closely did they cease their

objection. Even this, however, did not alleviate everyone's suspicions:

TLVe; 6' (UXUTGV ETrEiEvov TT 6uaoXEpLp' T;v OUK E E'ouV ET[rLVrT5EVu(TT)v KMIL T6
KUCTcXUiaOcL T& TraU rpLa tEYLXov i lyou'4EVOL fdp~flv KCKGUV OiOLOV ilrOloCFav .TrOKLV6UVEUOa L
&cXXOV ri 65OKElV E'aXaLTTO4 ovrlT at(UTO T T rOXLTELX;a T rEpLop&v 'HpG6rTlv Trp6o pLav
ETrELoCyYOVra T& il 6L' 'EOoui 6vVTC KC(L A6yo tv pcOLAXE' T 65' 'Epyo TrOXEitLOV
aXLV6t4EVOV TO) TUTav TOE 'OvouU



54 AJ 15.267.
55 Cf also Case 15-17.
56 AJ 15.275.
57 AJ 15.276.
58AJ 15.277.









("But some of them persisted in dissatisfaction with the practices that were not customary,
and they thought that such dismissal of the ancestral ways would lead to the beginning of
great evils, and that it was better to make a bold attempt than to seem to overlook the
changes Herod had made in their state, bringing things in by force which were not
customary, and that he was a king in pretext but in deed appeared as the enemy of all the
people.")59

Ongoing objections did not, however, put an end to the presence of Hellenism in Palestine.

After Herod's death, his son Herod Antipas continued in the same direction. "The rebuilding of

Sephhoris and establishment of Tiberias allowed the client king to demonstrate his enthusiasm

for the mingling of Greek, Roman, and local cultures that was taking place throughout the

Levant."60 In addition, a basilica was built in Beth-she'arim and a hippodrome was built in

Magdala.61 Krauss has shown that the rabbinic literature contains over three thousand Greek and

Latin loanwords,62 and Stein demonstrated suggestive parallels between the Seder and Passover

Haggadah on the one hand, and Greco-Roman symposia on the other hand.63 B. Cohen has

suggested points of contact between the legal corpora of Romans and Jews,64 and Daube

explored the influence of Hellenistic rhetoric on rabbinic Biblical interpretation.65 The overall

picture that emerges is that Hellenism was a substantial presence in the institutions of the Jews

within Palestine.

59 AJ 15.280-1. Out of sensitivity to Jewish religious concerns, Herod generally avoided
the use of images of living things in his buildings within Judea. He was more liberal outside of
Judea. Richardson, Building Jewish, 238-9.
60 Chancey 221.
61 Chancey 223.
62 S. Krauss, Greichsiche undLateinische Lehnworter im Talmud, Midrasch und Targum
(Berlin 1899).
63 S. Stein, 'The Influence of Symposia Literature on the Literary Form of the Pesah
Haggadah', JJS 8 (1957) 13-44.
64 B. Cohen, Jewish and Roman Law: A Comparative Study (New York 1966). A more
moderate assessment was provided by B. Jackson, 'On the Problem of Roman Influence on the
Halakah and Normative Self-Definition in Judaism', in E. Sanders et al (eds.), Jewish and
Christian Self-Definition 2. Aspects of Judaism in the Graeco-Roman Period (Philadelphia 1981)
157-203.
65 D. Daube, 'Rabbinic Methods and Interpretation and Hellenistic Rhetoric', HUCA 22
(1949) 239-64.









How did Diaspora Jews, those outside of Palestine, see themselves? Did they see

themselves as aliens in foreign lands, strangers to the culture around them? Did they see their

Jewishness constantly challenged by the Greek culture around them? Were they forced to live in

some kind of reluctant compromise with Judaism? Did they long for the homeland? Did they, in

essence, see themselves as living in some kind of exile? Or were they comfortable with many of

the elements of Hellenism? Again, there is no single picture that emerges from the ancient

evidence. Instead we find that Jewish feeling about life in the Diaspora ran a gamut of reactions.

"There is evidence that at least some Diaspora Jews of the Greco-Roman period understood

themselves as living in an ongoing 'exile' which would be remedied by an eventual return to the

Land."66 Some saw the destruction of the temple and the taking of Jews into foreign slavery as a

prelude to the coming of the Messiah.67 Others, however, did not define themselves in these

ways. Gruen concludes "It is not easy to imagine that millions of ancient Jews dwelled in foreign

parts for generations mired in misery and obsessed with a longing for Jerusalem that had little

chance of fulfillment. ... To assume that they repeatedly lamented their fate and pinned their

hopes on recovery of the homeland is quite preposterous."68 Even among those who did define

their Jewishness in terms of exile, the definitions are not consistent. For example, in the Book of

Jubilees, written in the second century BC, the role of the Israelite homeland is downplayed in

favor of a definition of Jewishness that emphasized the nation's moral purity and closeness with






66 J. Scott, 'Exile and the Self-Understanding of Diaspora Jews in the Greco-Roman
Period', in J. Scott (ed.), Exile: Old Testament, Jewish, and Christian Conceptions (Leiden 1997)
218.
67 B. Chilton, 'Salvific Exile in the Isaiah Targum', in J. Scott (ed.), Exile: Old
Testament, Jewish, and Christian Conceptions (SupJSJ 56, Leiden 1997) 239-47.
68 Diaspora, 234.









God.69 While the homeland could be a part of a Jew's self-definition, nothing said it had to be,

and most were apparently quite content without it playing a central role in their self-

understanding. The Zealots were, of course, the striking exception. But even Josephus does not

seem to think of the Diaspora in Hellenistic times in negative terms. He does not speak of either

the deportation by the Assyrians or by the Babylonians as an exile (vuyi ), nor does he speak of

his own removal to Rome as an exile. In fact, he seems to speak of the spread of the Jews

throughout the ancient world with pride.70 He sees no inherent problem with either the Diaspora

itself or its Hellenization. This corresponds with what I have pointed out in a previous chapter,

that the ethnographic character of Palestine for Jews was virtually disappearing in the first

century CE. In fact, some Jews in the Diaspora went to considerable lengths in appropriating

local culture. An inscription from lasos dated to the second century BCE lists a Jew, a certain

"Nicetas, son of Jason, a Jerusalemite," as a contributor to the Dionysia.71 Jews had reserved

seats in the theater at Miletus72 and Aphrodisias, and they participated in trade guilds in









69 B. Halpern-Amaru, 'Exile and Return in Jubilees', in J. Scott (ed.), Exile: Old
Testament, Jewish, and Christian Conceptions (Leiden 1997) 143-4. Interestingly, the book of
Jubilees was written in Hebrew.
70 L. Feldman, 'The Concept of Exile in Josephus', in J. Scott (ed.), Exile: Old Testament,
Jewish, and Christian Conceptions (Leiden 1997) 147-61.
71 E. Hicks, 'Iasos', JHS 8 (1887) 102. Whether he contributed willingly or under
compulsion, we do not know. M. Hengel, Jews, Greeks, and Barbarians (trans. J. Bowden,
Philadelphia 1980) 105.
72 According to the inscription on the fifth row of seats concerning a group called uov
OEooePLov. CIJII no. 748. Even if the inscription refers to Jewish sympathizers and not ethnic
Jews, it still evidences close contact between Jewish and pagan cultures. See J. Gager, 'Jews,
Gentiles, and Synagogues in the Book of Acts', HTR 79 (1986) 91-9. Philo attended the theater
performances in Alexandria (On Drunkenness 177).









Hierapolis.73 Inscriptional evidence shows that some Jews were among the gymnasium graduates

at Cyrene.74 In death, they used Greek funerary epithets.75

Jews in Hellenistic Egypt assimilated Greek culture to a relatively high degree, at least as

far as the matter can be judged from literary evidence. The Jewish historian Demetrius ("the

Chronographer"; c. late third century BCE) wrote a history of the Jewish monarchy that

employed the Greek literary device of aporialusis, indicating a thorough acquaintance with the

critical methodologies of his day.76 Artapanus, an Egyptian Jew of the mid-second century BCE,

wrote a work Concerning the Jews in which he retold Biblical stories in the genre of the

historical romance. He claimed that Moses was the teacher of Orpheus and that he was called

Hermes by the Egyptian priests.7 Artapanus was clearly interested in reconciling Jewish and

Hellenistic Egyptian religious claims, and the general tone of his work was pro-Egyptian.

Ezekiel the tragedian wrote The Exodus in iambic trimeter, following Greek tragic poetry

(especially Euripides and Aeschylus).78 Aristobulus (fl. mid-second century BCE) employed

allegory in his exegesis of Jewish scripture along lines similar to those of the Stoics, and the

surviving fragments of his work show evidence of interaction with the Stoic and Pythagorean

philosophies.79 He claimed that Greeks knew the teachings of Moses, thus implying that the

Jewish traditions were older. The Letter ofAristeas, of Egyptian provenance, described the



73 A. Kraabel, 'Impact of the Discovery of the Sardis Synagogue', in J. Overman and R.
MacLennan (eds.), Diaspora Jews and Judaism: Essays in Honor of and in Dialogue I ith, A.
Thomas Kraabel (Atlanta 1992) 275.
74 M. Williams (ed.) 107, 113f.
75 M. Williams (ed.) 126-28.
76 C. Holladay, 'Jewish Responses to Hellenistic Culture in Early Ptolemaic Egypt', in P.
Bilde et al (eds.), Ethnicity in Hellenistic Egypt (Studies in Hellenistic Civilization 3, Aarhus
1992) 140.
77Holladay 141, 145.
78Holladay 141.
79 Holladay 142.









Septuagint as originating in Hellenistic Egyptian interest in and respect for the Jewish sacred

texts, and portrayed the production of the translation as a model of Jewish-Egyptian cordiality.

The account followed the rhetorical canons of the progymnasmata in creating a work in the

Greek genre of diegesis.80 "Such willingness to experiment with new literary forms, especially to

this extent, suggests a rather significant level of engagement with Hellenistic culture."81 The

Letter stops short, however, of any sense of full assimilation of Hellenistic values. For all its

conciliatory tone, the author defends strict monotheism over against the polytheism of the culture

around him.82 However, he is willing to treat Jewish food laws-which were always a major

difference between Jews and their pagan neighbors-allegorically.83 The Third Sibylline Oracle,

produced in Egypt in the mid-second century BCE, took a more conservative stance. It was

critical of pagan religion, but it stopped short of expressing hostility and was, after all, in a Greek

literary form (pronouncements from a sibyl). At the other end of the spectrum, Philo of

Alexandria, who lived a generation before Josephus, was practicing an allegorical approach to

the Jewish scriptures to show the basic compatibility of Jewish beliefs and Greek philosophy. All

of this shows that some Egyptian Jews were doing what Josephus would do in Rome in the first

century CE: using Greek literary models to forge an essentially Greek ethnicity for Jews.

On the whole, these works are evidence of the willingness of Egyptian Jews to participate

in the intellectual life of the Hellenistic culture around them, and to express their ethnicity in new

ways. Holladay notes

Jewish engagement with Hellenistic culture, as represented in these writings, represents
both an exercise in ethnic promotion as well as ethnic self-preservation. ... Their
appropriation of these new forms suggests not only that Hellenistic culture was speaking to


80 Holladay 142.
81 Holladay 143.
82 Sections 134-8.
83 Sections 151-2.









them, but that they were speaking to Hellenistic culture. Yet these new literary forms are
also serving to reinforce ethnic identity by providing ways for making both Jewish
scripture and tradition more credible to Jews themselves.84

Similarly, Gabba notes that "The emergence of a Jewish literature in Alexandria, at the end of

the third century BCE, does not betoken a missionary or apologetic campaign directed towards

Greek readers, but rather an internal need of the Jewish community itself, since it aims to

strengthen the Jews' own consciousness of their religion and nationality."5 The Jews of

Alexandria maintained their specifically Jewish customs as they lived in that city. They had

synagogues, they followed the dietary restrictions, and they had their own governing council.

They were, to use the Greek term, a TrOXiEu[LTa.86

Whether in or out of Palestine, a degree of Jewish acculturation with Hellenism was

regularly observed. Even that most solid criterion of Jewishness, Jewish religion, was

significantly affected. Three examples will illustrate this point broadly. First, the Torah was

common to all Jews, even if only nominally. Collins notes that "The Torah provided a common

basis for postexilic Judaism in the sense that all forms of Judaism related to it in one way or

another.87 Yet he goes on to note that in spite of the unifying character of the Torah, "It did not

provide a definitive norm in the sense of prescribing a single orthodox way of being Jewish."88

However, the fact remains that the Jews had something that few other people in antiquity had: a

single document to which they could appeal for their self-identity. Within this one document, the

Torah, was contained both the narratives of Israel's founding fathers as well as the laws which

framed the Israelite covenant with their God. Himmelfarb notes that the Torah "was a central

84 Holladay 144.
85 Gabba 637.
86 A. Kasher, 'The Civic Status of the Jews in Ptolemaic Egypt', in P. Bilde et al (eds.),
Ethnicity in Hellenistic Egypt (Studies in Hellenistic Civilization 3, Aarhus 1992) 117.
87 J. Collins, Between Aithen and Jerusalem: Jewish Identity in the Hellenistic Diaspora
(2nd edn, Grand Rapids 2000) 20.
88 Collins, Between A iien, and Jerusalem 20.









institution for Jews in the hellenistic period" and that this institutionalized document attained

such a powerful status that it enabled Jews to maintain a grip on their ethnic heritage sufficient to

withstand the leveling force of Hellenism.89 However, even the Torah itself could be subjected to

a thoroughly Hellenistic treatment (in addition to having been translated in Greek). The works of

Artapanus and Ezekiel the Tragedian had already taken a step in this direction.

Second, many Jews considered circumcision the defining characteristic of a Jew, and

apparently many non-Jews considered it the same way.90 Whenever Petronius mentioned Jews,

he saw circumcision as their defining custom.91 In Luke's Acts of the Apostles, converted Jewish

Pharisaic teachers who wished to interpret Christianity along the lines of Pharisaic Judaism

insisted that Gentile converts be circumcised according to the covenant demand of the Jewish

Torah.92 This emphasis on the symbol of circumcision was not unique to Palestinian Jews. Yet

discussions over the necessity of observing the practice are frequent enough in the ancient

literature to suggest that many doubted whether it was essential to Jewish self-definition. By no

means is it clear that basically all Jews in the Hellenistic period saw it that way. Josephus himself

sometimes omits references to it in his retelling of Biblical stories,93 and some Jews had the

surgical procedure known as epispasm performed to reverse their circumcision. The reason for

this was that it was considered unacceptable to appear in a public bath or gymnasium

circumcised. The author of 1 Maccabees recalls with disdain how this was done even during the



89 M. Himmelfarb, 'The Torah Between Athens and Jerusalem: Jewish Difference in
Antiquity', in C. Bakhos (ed.), Ancient Judaism in its Hellenistic Context (SupJSJ 95, Boston
2005) 114, 121-2.
90 Hadrian's later prohibition of the practice suggests that it was interpreted as a clear
sign of the practice of Judaism. Scriptores historiae Augustae: Hadrian 14.2.
91 Satyricon 68.8; 102.13-14; frag. 37.
92 Acts 15.1, 5.
93 E.g., in the story of Joshua, AJ5.1, and in the story of the demands of Jacob's sons on
the Shechemites, AJ 1.340.









time of Jason: KCi cLKO6Ot rlolcv yU[LV /oLo v 'v TIpoooXu[ioLt KXT( Tr& VO[LL[Lc T()V 'Ov()V K CL

ETrOirjoav EauTOtL dLKpopuoTLCa ("and they built a gymnasium in Jerusalem according to the

customs of the Gentiles, and they made themselves uncircumcised").94 The fact that some Jews

went to this length to participate in that most important Hellenistic institution, the gymnasium,

speaks volumes about the degree of Hellenistic acculturation among the ancient Jews. 95 It is

further indication of how the elements or markers of Jewish ethnicity were not considered fixed.

Third, many Jews, and apparently many non-Jews, in the Hellenistic period thought that

Sabbath observance was a chief identifying mark of Jews. Josephus himself seems to brag that it

was known throughout the Greek world.96 If there was an element that was a near-universal

marker of Jewish identity, the Sabbath came close to it. Sabbath-keeping among the Jews of

Rome is mentioned by Horace,97 Tibullus,98 Ovid,99 Pompeius Trogus,100 Seneca,101 Petronius,102



94 1.14-15.
95 On a related point, it has been claimed that the Letter of Claudius to the Alexandrians
indicates that Jews of that city were trying to gain access into the gymnasium. Roman
reorganization of Egypt had led to the gymnasium becoming one of the most elite social
institutions in the country's metopoleis (R. Alston, 'Philo's "In Flaccum": Ethnicity and Social
Space in Roman Alexandria', G&R 44 (1997) 167-9). Entrance was admitted only to ephebes. In
the aftermath of the riot in 38 CE, Claudius told the Jews, among other things rl65 E'TrLOTrraLLV
yuVCvaoLapXLKOK~ i KOOG4TITLKO- &y(C)OL ("not to intrude into the games put on by the
gymnasiarchoi or the cosmetai"; line 93). The reading EiTrLTrcapeLv has been suggested instead of
E~TrotraeLv, which would mean that the Jews were told not to oppose or harass the games (A.
Kasher, 'The Jewish Attitude to the Alexandrian Gymnasium in the First Century AD',
American Journal of Ancient History 1 (1976) 152-6). Exactly what the Jews were doing with
reference to the gymnasium in Alexandria is unclear either way, and Kasher's suggestion is
based on an incorrect understanding of the Jewish population's status as a Tro Ltutxa (see Collins,
Between Aihden and Jerusalem, 120-2). Since this evidence is ambiguous, I have not included it
as evidence of Jewish assimilation of Hellenism in antiquity.
96 Ap. 2.282.
97 Satires 1.9.
98 Eleg. 1.3.13ff.
99 Ars Amat. 1.3, 11; Rem. Amat.219-20.
100 As reported in the Epitome ofPompeius Trogus by Marcus Junianus Justinus, bk 36.
101 As reported in August., De Civ. D. 6.11.
102 Fragmenta 37.









Marital,103 Juvenal,104 and Tacitus.105 In fact, the Jewish practice of refraining from labor on the

Sabbath was so well-known that it evidently gave rise to a belief that Jews even refrained from

eating on the Sabbath.106 As noted in the previous chapter, this custom was interpreted as being

alien and was treated with ridicule. Williams suggests that the Sabbath played a special role in

the lives of Jews in Rome, since most of those Jews were descendants of people who had been

sent to Rome as slaves after Pompey's subjugation of Judea in 63 BC and Sosius' recapture of

Jerusalem from the Parthians in 37 BC. On both occasions, the historians say that Jerusalem fell

to the invaders on a Sabbath. The Sabbath, then, was for Roman Jews a day of remembrance of

their present exile.107 In other words, its praxis served a role in their ethnicity.

Yet even this essential Jewish institution acquired Hellenistic features. Closely related to

the Sabbath was the institution of the synagogue, where Sabbath assemblies were convened and,

in the Diaspora, the Scriptures were read in Greek. The existence of synagogues throughout the

ancient world is a well-known fact, and Hellenistic influence is apparent in their architecture.

Synagogues were typically built according to the style of the country in which they existed,108

and many examples of synagogues built in good Hellenistic style survive, including in Palestine.

Levine notes that based upon both architectural remains and literary descriptions, in Galilee and

the Golan it was almost impossible to distinguish a synagogue from a non-Jewish edifice merely





103 4.4.
104 14.96-106.
105 Hist. 5.4.
106 J. Michael, 'The Jewish Sabbath in the Latin Classical Writers', American Journal of
Semitic Languages and Literature 40 (1924) 124.
107 M. Williams, 'Being a Jew in Rome: Sabbath Fasting as an Expression of Romano-
Jewish Identity', in J. Barclay (ed.), Negotiating Diaspora. Jewish Strategies in the Roman
Empire (London 2004) 15-18.
108 Levine 139-79.









by its exterior.109 Outside of Palestine there is the striking example of the synagogue in Sardis,

which was part of a massive urban complex that comprised the public gymnasium.110 The only

way into the synagogue is through the entrance on the outside street; no entrance from the

gymnasium complex was available. In the main hall of the synagogue was a heavy table that

probably served as the lectern. The supports of this table carry carved depictions of Roman

eagles clutching thunderbolts, and the table itself is flanked by two pairs of stone lions, which

were prominent in the local mythology of Sardis.111 The entrance to the synagogue had a public

fountain, the floors were done in mosaics, and Greek inscriptions lined the walls surrounding the

aedicules which probably housed the Torah scrolls. The impression is one of a wealthy Jewish

community that felt comfortable with its Hellenistic surroundings and its symbols, yet at the

same time maintained a measure of distance.112 Thus even an institution as significant for self-

definition as the Sabbath was subjected, in the synagogue, to considerable Hellenistic influence.

The picture that develops is that there was no corner of ancient Judaism that was not

affected by Hellenism, even in Palestine. Even those ethnic markers that were considered most

characteristic or even essential to Jewish self-definition were affected by Hellenism in some

ways. There was no single, monolithic entity of Judaism in the first century CE. The ethnic

boundaries were never clearly or firmly fixed, nor was there agreement among Jews as to level

of acculturation with Hellenistic culture was and what was not acceptable, or what degree of



109 P.143.
110 The synagogue apparently became part of the complex after it was rebuilt and
remodeled in the second century CE. A. Kraabel, 'Paganism and Judaism: The Sardis Evidence',
in J. Overman and R. MacLenna (eds.), Diaspora Jews and Judaism: Essays in Honor of and in
Dialogue i/ ith, A. Thomas Kraabel (Atlantal992) 242.
111 Kraabel, 'Paganism and Judaism', 245-6.
112 Goodman ('Jews and Judaism', 193-7) has suggested, based on the unusual features of
the site, that the building might have been not a synagogue, but a place where Gentiles ("God-
fearers") worshipped the Jewish God. This interpretation has not gained general acceptance.









assimilation constituted a compromise of Jewish identity. Instead, there was a general dialogue

of Jews with Hellenism that was going on simultaneously in different places, and at different

levels, and with different convictions about what constituted an acceptable degree of

acculturation. It is clear that Hellenism provoked a crisis in Jewish self-definition, and that crisis

was met with varying responses.

Yet the great abundance of evidence suggests more than the fact that Hellenism merely

penetrated Judaism. It suggests also that among most Jews in antiquity, there was a perceived

need to fit into Hellenistic culture at large. The Jews were, at various levels, eager to see

themselves in Greek terms. Hellenization on the part of the Jews was intentional. It was, as we

have seen, more than the presence of Greek elements in native non-Greek societies. Hellenism

necessitated peoples' redefinition of themselves, and the Jews actively participated in this

process. The significance of this fact for the present study is that it helps us to see more clearly

the character of Josephus' works.

Conclusion

I discussed in the previous chapter that a strong anti-Jewish sentiment pervaded the Roman

world of Josephus' day, and this was sufficient to provoke a sense of a need for self-definition

among Jews. In this chapter I have shown that many Jews attempted to overcome this negative

perception by embracing Hellenism, often to great lengths. In other words, Hellenism was widely

perceived to be the solution to the problem. The outsiders (in this case, Jews) were trying to get

in by adopting, as much as they could, cultural identity markers belonging to the insiders (those

identified by Hellenistic criteria). This was, to be sure, a balancing act in which the goal was to

get "inside" without sacrificing those things that expressed their own self-understanding as

Jewish (which made them "outsiders" in the first place). To be both thoroughly Jewish and

thoroughly Hellenistic was surely a difficult thing to attempt, and it is doubtful if many Jews









ever really succeeded at convincing other peoples of the Roman world that they had

accomplished it. The persistence of rejection from the Greco-Roman society at large in spite of

sweeping adoption of Hellenistic identity markers on the part of Jews confirms this.

The point to see is that the Jews themselves saw no problem in being both Jewish and

Hellenistic. This was because they were able intellectually to divorce certain expressions of

Greco-Roman culture from religion. This was a different mindset than operated among most

others. Most public buildings in the Greco-Roman world, including places like public baths, had

close religious associations bound up with them. It does not seem that the Jews could have, or

would have, denied a connection between culture and religion. The ancient world was saturated

with this kind of thinking, and the Jews were no exception. In their way of thinking, however,

the connection was between culture and religion (in general), but not necessarily with Greco-

Roman religion in particular. It is precisely at this point that Josephus found a way "in." He

proposed to define Jewishness as equal to, but without being identical to, the cultural and

religious heritage of the Greeks and Romans. In this way he preserved what was specifically

Jewish and at the same time hoped to negotiate a place within the dominant culture around him.

Given the dilemma of defining Jews in terms of what was unique to them or what was

compatible with Hellenistic culture, Josephus made his case on the Greek side of self-definition,

since the Romans had admired and patterned much of their own culture after that of the Greeks.

In portraying the Jews as he did, Josephus was participating in an on-going dialogue and, at the

same time, advancing it through new means historiographyy in the Greek vein).

Of course, this line of reasoning involved a problem. Josephus hoped that Jews and

Judaism would find a place in the larger Roman society, that it would be accepted and respected

because it shared many of the virtues the Romans had long admired among the Greeks. In other









words, Josephus was hoping that Roman cultural and religious pluralism would be large enough

to embrace the Jews and their religion. The problem, however, was that the pluralistic sentiment

did not run the other way. Josephus was unwilling to compromise what he understood to be

essential elements in Judaism in order to bridge the gap between "inside" and "outside."

Fundamental among these elements was monotheism. The difference between Jew and Gentile

was, for Josephus, a real one. He neither ignored it nor dismissed it. Everyone knew better.

However, syncretism of the kind needed to fully assimilate Judaism into the Roman world was

not possible. This would prove to be the deal-breaker. "Jewish faith bred an anti-social

clannishness which in turn cast suspicion on them as citizens."113 Yet Josephus hoped he could

get around this by emphasizing the good qualities that already existed within his people.

Josephus hoped to present a broader picture of Judaism which revealed that it was consonant

with peoples the Romans already admired and accepted.

























113 J. Daniel, 'Anti-Semitism', 58.









CHAPTER 5
JEWISH ETHNICITY IN JOSPEHUS' BELLUMJUDAICUM

The Bellum Judaicum and the Greek Tradition of Historiography

In his first literary work, the Bellum Judaicum, Josephus consciously stepped into the

world of Greek historiography and crafted a narrative that not only read or sounded like Greek

history, but that also portrayed the Jews as being a people similar in many ways to the ancient

Greeks. Scholarship on Josephus has long explored his use of Greek models in it. Some scholars

(e.g. Holscher, Bilde, Horsley, Feldman) have suggested that Josephus' use of these models is

merely formal and conventional, but others (e.g., Shutt, Mader) have argued that it is functional.

If the use of these models is simply conventional, then it remains to explain why they had to be

used at all. Of course it is certainly possible, even probable, that this is part of a strategy to win

an initial reading of his account. After all, why would a Greek or Roman reader be inclined to

read something written in a mode foreign to them? It would be much better to tell the story in a

way that did not tax the reader up front. Furthermore, all historians after the classical period felt

compelled to imitate Herodotus and especially Thucydides to some extent. Marincola notes that

the literary tradition of classical antiquity-including the writing of history-was
conservative and, ... had as its central technique the employment of mimesis, the creative
imitation of one's predecessors. The idea that one should imitate one's great predecessors,
and look to them for the proper way to treat almost any task is a fundamental aspect of
ancient literary creation and criticism. Already established by the fourth century BC,
imitation of one's predecessors never ceased to exert an influence on ancient writers of
both poetry and prose.

However, mere use of traditional vocabulary or imitation of style was not enough. "... the writer

must appropriate the spirit of his model or models and breathe new life into them .... the goal of

ancient composition was not to strike out boldly in a radical departure from one's predecessors,

but rather to be incrementally innovative within a tradition, by embracing the best in previous


1 Pp.12-13.









performers and adding something of one's own marked with an individual stamp."2 There is

ample evidence that Josephus was aware of what good Greek history was supposed to look like,

and yet it is also clear that Josephus did not simply go about his work in a merely mechanical

way.3 He even stated explicitly that he was aware of the "rules" for the production of a proper

historical account. In Bellum Judaicum 5.20, while lamenting the fate of Jerusalem, Josephus

says a&X&' KUcOEKTeOV y&p K TCi C& TrCTrl r|c v Toco TT|( ypc))f WU OUK 6XO(UP[pLoGv OLKEL'V 6

KcLpOd; &,' &iry1oe'Wg uTpay~~mov ("but it is necessary by the rule of composition to refrain

from such emotions, as not being the time for personal lamentations but the narrating of events").

In other words, he followed the models, but not slavishly, and gave his own personal cast to the

work.

Precisely how much of this modeling and borrowing was due to Josephus himself has been

debated, for, as I have noted, he admits that he had help with Greek composition. Some modern

scholars have gone as far as to suggest that Josephus' literary assistants were responsible for

much of the finished result. Thackeray believed that these "hacks" (as he calls them) were

trained in the Thucydidean school which is mentioned by Cicero and Lucian4 and were therefore

responsible for the good Atticistic style of the work, although they were, in Thackeray's opinion,

far inferior in style to the master, Thucydides. Thackeray even thought he could distinguish

different assistants in different parts of the Antiquities. This may be more than the evidence can

bear, for style is a difficult criteria to define and use in source criticism. Shutt correctly observes

that Josephus' statement about "assistants with the Greek language" does not mean that Josephus

was mostly ignorant of the language and that the assistants therefore basically did much of the


2 Marincola 14.
3 This was established in Attridge's dissertation.
4 Cic. Orat. 9.30; Lucianus Hist.Conscr. 15.21-3.
5 Josephus: The Man and the Historian 107-116.









actual composition, but that Josephus was conversant in the vernacular Koine and simply needed

help in producing a more refined, polished written Greek in the Atticistic style.6 Even with help,

Josephus was the final judge of what was produced under his name, and the thoroughly Greek

cast of the work was still ultimately the product of its author. As Raj ak has noted, "It would be

rash ... to suppose that he would not be fit, when eventually he came to the Greek War, at the

very least to collaborate fruitfully with his assistants, and to take the ultimate responsibility for

substance and style alike."7

There is a sense in which war was the first, and always the greatest, theme of Greek

historiography. This goes back to the epic tradition institutionalized in Homer's Iliad, and it is

also the main theme in Herodotus (the Persian War), Xenophon (the expedition of Cyrus),

Thucydides (the Peloponnesian War), and Polybius (the Roman conquest of Greece). Similarly,

the conflict of Greeks versus barbarians, or east versus west (Herodotus), became emphatic

aspects of the typical narrative. The treatment of warfare never lost sight of its epic roots, and by

the first century CE there was an observable "intermeshing between historical narratives and epic

in the area of warfare."8 Josephus' use of Greek historiographical models for the account of a

great war can be understood as a facet of his program of building a Greek-looking ethnicity for

Jews. Rajak recognizes this when she notes that "what is striking and even bold in Josephus is

the very fact that he had introduced a distinctive Jewish interpretation into a political history

which is fully Greek in form, juxtaposing the two approaches."9 The fact that the Jews had

participated in a war that was billed by the Flavian dynasty as one of the greatest wars of recent


6 Pp.59-68.
7 Josephus: The Historian andHis Society 62-3.
8 R. Ash, 'Epic Encounters? Ancient Historical Battle Narratives and the Epic Tradition',
in Clio and the Poets: Augustan Poetry and the Traditions ofAncient Historiography
(Mnemosyne 224, Leiden 2002) 255.
9 Josephus: The Historian andHis Society 79.









memory naturally presented Josephus with an opportunity to compare the Jews and the Greeks in

their experience of an epic war. His choice to write on the theme of a great war also had a direct

relationship with his agenda of ethnicity-building, because "War defines opposition between

one subject group and others, and between a collective self and a collective enemy. It is the most

extreme form of realizing identity and otherness."10 Josephus' account, which explicitly aimed to

correct then-current interpretations of the war, would attack head-on the idea that most Jews

were confirmed enemies of Hellenistic culture and Roman society. In effect, he would use a

story about a conflict to disarm the perceptions of cultural hostilities that the conflict had

produced.

In the ancient Roman culture of honor and shame, character and credibility went hand-in-

hand, and an historian's credibility rested to a large extent on the public perception of his own

character. It is not surprising, therefore, that Josephus engages in what appears to us today to be

an inordinate amount of self-flattery for the purpose of establishing his own authority and thus

the authority of his account. Josephus no doubt saw himself (or at least saw an opportunity to

portray himself) as similar to noted Greek historians and thus as standing in a legitimate role as a

Greek historiographer. For example, both Thucydides and Josephus were commanders in the war

in which they participated, both lost the engagements in which they were involved, and both

received the criticism of their fellow-countrymen for it.1 Concerning Polybius and Josephus,

both men served in military positions in their own home countries, both came under the

protective sponsorship of powerful Roman families, both witnessed the destruction of great cities



10 T. Holscher 4.
11 It is a curious coincidence that many Greek historiographers were exiles from their
own cities: Herodotus, Thucydides, Ctesias, Theopompus, Philoistus, Timaeus, Polybius,
Dionysius of Halicarnassus, and Posidonius. A. Momigliano, 'Greek Historiography', History
and Theory 17 (1978) 9. To this list we may add Josephus.









that were dear to them (Corinth and Jerusalem), and both wrote histories concentrating on

Roman power in which they defended their own behavior.12 Concerning Xenophon and

Josephus, both served as military leaders (neither of high rank), both served a foreign army

(albeit in different capacities), both witnessed a decisive military engagement in their day, both

wrote an account of their experiences, and both had to deal with the image of being a traitor.13 It

is likely that Josephus realized that his own experiences had paralleled many of the experiences

of the great Greek soldier-historians and that he stood in an ideal position to write the account of

the Jewish War.

In the course of the account Josephus presented himself as an ideal general who had the

status of a hero among the Jews, whose capture all but guaranteed Roman victory, and whom

Vespasian praised as "the most sagacious of his enemies."14 The need for this characterization

was exacerbated in Josephus' case by the fact that he had a personal detractor, Justus of Tiberias,

who had also written an account of the war that portrayed Josephus as the enemy of Rome.15

However, Josephus was also consciously following the Greek historiographical tradition by

presenting himself so positively. S. Cohen has noted that Josephus' self-portrayals follow

familiar Greek models.16 His self-description mirrors the kinds of stock descriptions of good





12 Eckstein 175.
13 There are, of course, significant differences between the two. Xenophon witnessed a
battle fought on a battlefield (Cunaxa), whereas Josephus witnessed the siege of a city
(Jerusalem). Xenophon claims that when he joined the expedition of Cyrus, he did not know its
purpose. When Josephus joined the Roman side, however, it was because he was convinced that
God was on the side of the Romans. In a twist of irony, Josephus says that in his case, it was the
Romans who were ignorant of the nature of the fight they entered. Also, Xenophon fights his
way back home, but Josephus remains in Rome.
14BJ2.568, 3.143-4, 341, 435-6; Attridge, 'Josephus and His Works', 188.
15 Josephus' response to Justus appears in Vit. 1:336-67.
16 S. Cohen, Josephus in Galilee andRome 91-7.









generals found in authors such as Cicero and Onasander,17 and he attributes to himself the use of

the same kinds of military tactics that are described in Thucydides, Herodotus, and other sources.

For example, raising the height of the walls and erecting animal-skin coverings over his men (BJ

3.171-4) was done at Plataea in the Peloponnesian War (Th. 2.75), and hanging out wet objects

to make the enemy think the defenders have plenty of water inside the city (BJ 3.186-9) was

done by Thrasybulus of Miletus (Hdt. 1.21.1-22.3). S. Cohen puts all of this down to Josephus'

ego and claims that it was counter to Josephus' apologetic purpose.18 I would suggest, however,

that two other considerations apply here. First, Josephus was engaging in an aspect of the Greek

tradition by his self-advertisement. "That the ancient historian was concerned with his own fame

and wrote history to achieve renown is not to be doubted."19 Second, this characterization formed

the perfect complement to his presentation of his own people, the Jews, as similar to the ancient

Greeks in this experience. Just as the Greeks had a tradition of war and great historians, so the

Jews had the First Jewish War and Josephus.

From a literary point of view, Josephus stood in a great stream of tradition of prose

Hellenic historiography, and he consciously incorporated many conventions from that tradition

into his own history. This was recognized as early as the fourth century CE, when Jerome

described Josephus as "the Greek Livy."20 Casting stories in Greek molds for the benefit of

Greek readers was part of this tradition, traceable back to Xanthus.21 In particular, authors of

histories regularly acquainted themselves with the histories of other authors and felt obliged to



17 Cic. De Imperio Cn. Pompei 13.36-48; Onasander 1.1, 2.2.
18 S. Cohen, Josephus in Galilee and Rome 95-7.
19 Marincola 61. cf A. Momigliano: "Adulation, rather than propaganda, was the
insidious tempter of the classical historians" ('Tradition and the Classical Historian', History and
Theory 11 (1972) 286).
20 Ep. XXII adEustochium, 35.
21 Momigliano, 'Greek Historiography', 3.









imitate their style and work, but also to advance upon them in some way (including correcting

them). As noted above, the ideal was to pay homage to the tradition and yet not be completely

bound by it. It was also customary to offer some kind of criticism of one's predecessors and their

treatment of events. This element in the historiographical tradition goes back to Hecataeus of

Miletus, and was perhaps most famously sounded in Thucydides' criticism of Herodotus (1.20).

Josephus engaged in all of these aspects of the tradition. He was acquainted with the works of

Thucydides, Herodotus, Polybius, Dionysius of Halicamassus, and Nicolaus of Damascus at a

minimum-of whom the first three were considered the standard models for Hellenistic

historians22 (although he specifically mentions none of them in the Bellum Judaicum). Yet he

made it clear that he was also making an original contribution: LX6ATrovovC 65 oi( 6 eXTraTrOLUv

OLKOVO[LLoV KUL T"dULV dXX'OTUpLcv dcXX' 6 4LUer TO) KCLVC& XEYELV KML Tb oCJIc Tri [GoTopL'U

KaTROKEUU CV 'i"Lov ("The industrious one is not he who remodels the arrangement and order of

another but who, along with reporting new things, prepares his own body of history").23 He also

complained that Greek historians had neglected Jewish history almost completely,24 that he was

aware of other histories of the Jewish War, and that he set out to correct what he thought were

glaring inaccuracies in them.25 This last complaint is, in fact, arguably the most emphatic theme

in the introduction to the Bellum Judaicum, but it is also quite Thucydidean as well, since

Thucydides registered the same kinds of complaints about the historian Hellanicus.26







22 Momigliano, 'Tradition and the Classical Historian', 280.
23 BJ1.15.
24 BJ 1.13.
25 BJ 1.1, 6-9.
26 1.97.









Another part of the Greek historiographical tradition was an ongoing debate over the value

and purpose of history,27 whether it was for entertainment or for a didactic purpose. A didactic

purpose required accuracy and emphasis on truth, whereas history as entertainment participated

in conventions from tragedy (paradox, crisis, suspense, intervention of the gods, myth, etc.).

Thucydides was considered the model for didactic history, and later also Polybius. Herodotus

was more the story-teller, but Cicero called him "the father of history" because he was the first to

differentiate clearly between myth and history in his account, and his expressed aim was to

preserve the memory of the glorious deeds of the past: ) [rE Ti yevo[ievc kE &dvOPpd)rv TO

XpoV(o E'LTrM ax yEvrrTaL, TirtE 'Epy'a [EYUaAX TE KUL Go&iao u& Eiv "Eir|OL 'U 5& papppoLoL

dTro6EXOE8VTr d&KXE& yEvrTLca ("so that the things done by men might not be forgotten in time, nor

the great and marvelous works, some displayed by the Greeks and some by the barbarians, might

become inglorious").28 In good Herodotean style, Josephus claims KdyG) ... Tv LV 'iLrv TLV

KaropOWLt)TWV dTvac(OrlLt ("I am setting forth the memorial of great achievements"). However,

the Greek historiographical tradition was strongly indebted to Greek tragedy from Herodotus

onwards, and this element of it never disappeared.29 Therefore, although Josephus stated that his

account of the Jewish war was not designed for entertainment, but for those who seriously

wished to know the facts about it,30 he did not ignore the rhetorical, dramatic side of history-

writing. Eusebius had long ago recognized the tragic nature of the Josephus' account of Herod,31

and G. M. Paul noted that Josephus used past unreal conditional sentences, probably imitated

from Homer and introducing an unexpected event that dramatically reverses the situation in the


27 Momigliano, 'Tradition and the Classical Historian', 291.
28 Hdt. 1.1.
29 These two aims are not necessarily exclusive, as Rhodes has noted (p. 166).
30 BJ 1.6, 16.
31 He calls it a TpayLKi 6pacaroupyLa in H.E. 1.8. Thackeray notes several dramatic
elements in that story in his preface to the Loeb edition of Josephus, II xvi-xvii.









narrative, in order "to present Titus in particular in a dramatic way."32 Chapman has shown that

Josephus employed the device of spectacle and the language of Greek tragedy to describe the

siege of Jerusalem and other stories in his account,33 and R. Hall has demonstrated a

correspondence between Josephus' method in the Contra Apionem and the canons of Roman

rhetorical inquiry.34

As the Greek tradition of historiography developed, there came to be an emphasis on

contemporary history. Even those who wrote about the ancient past brought the narrative down

to their present day. There developed a general reluctance to re-hash what others had already said

about the past because of the belief that the past was unavailable historically. The difference

between heroic and historical times was basically introduced by the work of Hecataeus. This

distinction was already accepted and assumed by the time of Herodotus, and an emphasis on

contemporary history began in earnest with Thucydides. There came to be a realization that the

past was, in a real sense, beyond the historian's grasp and therefore there was nothing new to

add. Opportunity and fame as a historian lay instead in writing on new things. Of course,

Josephus wrote of a war that happened within his own lifetime and within his own experience.

He sharply criticized Greek historians who had neglected such a great war in favor of simply re-

hashing the histories of older times, some for which they had no data.35





32 G. M. Paul, 'The Presentation of Titus in the "Jewish War" of Josephus: Two Aspects',
Phoenix 47 (1993) 57.
33 H. Chapman, 'Spectacle and Theater in Josephus' Bellum Judaicum' (PhD Diss.
Stanford University 1998).
34 R. Hall, 'Josephus, Contra Apionem and Historical Inquiry in the Roman Rhetorical
Schools', in L. Feldman and J. Levison (eds.), Josephus' Contra Apionem: Studies in Its
Character and Cniexi\ n i//h a Latin Concordance to the Portion Missing in Greek (Leiden 1996)
229-49.
35 BJ 1.14-16.









The craft of the ancient historian lay in the discernment and description of change and its

causes. This theme fascinated the ancients of the classical world, especially the Ionian pre-

Socratic philosophers. Behind all things they searched for the underlying principles and causes.

This quest for identifying causes of historical events appeared prominently in Herodotus and

Thucydides, but was well-alive in later Greek historians also. In fact, the themes of change and

war often went hand-in-hand, because wars were often the means by which great societal

changes were effected.36 Accordingly, Josephus' choice of a war as the subject of his first book

was thus a natural foray into Greek historiography, and he spent a large section of his account

(1.1-2.283, or 956 sections of the text as it has come to be divided) describing the political

context that, in his view, led to the First Jewish War.37 Josephus' descriptions of the several

smaller events that cumulatively led to the great revolt cannot help but remind us of the same

kind of presentation in Thucydides.

Another fascination for the Greek historians was foreign lands and peoples. The

ethnographic emphasis in the tradition goes back to Homer's Odyssey and is prominent also in

the travel digressions in Hecataeus, Herodotus, and Theopompus. However, it was the Greek

experience of war against foreign enemies that brought the differences between Greeks and

barbarians into sharpest focus. What was essentially Greek became clearer through the

exploration of the customs, laws, and governments of other peoples, and through the accounts of

conflict with them, so this element of the tradition served a role in the construction, or

affirmation, of Greek ethnicity. Similarly, Josephus acted as if his Greek and Roman readers





36 Momigliano, 'Tradition and the Classical Historian', 283.
37 In fact, Josephus seems to have been especially aware of the complex nature of the
causes of this war. Bilde, 'The Causes of the Jewish War', 197-202.









were naturally interested in matters of Jewish history,38 which was probably a rhetorical touch on

his part. The assumption, however, bought into the paradigm neatly. It added to the sense that

one was reading legitimate Greek historiography.

Literary artistry was considered another hallmark of proper Greek history-writing. It

remained that good, respectable history was first and foremost supposed to be factual and

truthful, yet all historians felt the need for their accounts to be written in a way that was engaging

(following the high style of Thucydides). Josephus explicitly distanced himself from merely

rhetorical accounts in Bellum Judaicum 1.1, where he spoke of other accounts that had been

written "sophistically" (oodLjoTLK(Ji). Some modern scholars would judge this to be mere lip-

service on Josephus' part, since his account is fairly heavy with rhetorical flourishes.39 However,

it is not the truth of the claim that is ultimately important, but the impression that claim makes on

the reader. In this same vein, Josephus was also careful to note in Bellum Judaicum 1.13-14 that

excellence of literary style ought not be the primary standard of good history either. In fact, in

that passage Josephus implicitly compares his own account with the accounts of the classical

historians, and against contemporary Greek authors. In doing so he was participating in the

Roman practice, noted before, of distinguishing between the noble Greeks of the past and

contemporary Greeks of lesser achievements, and comparing himself favorably with the former.

The personal observation of what was studied (autopsy), participation in the events one

narrated, or having seen sites personally was considered a requirement for any Greek historian

who wished to be judged as competent. Thucydides had participated in the Peloponnesian War,

and Polybius experienced Roman conquest himself and even claimed to have visited the site



38 BJ 1.3, 16; cf. AJ 1.9.
39 Cf S. Cohen, Josephus in Galilee andRome, 90: "BJ is a good representative of
rhetorical historiography."









where Hannibal crossed the Alps. This emphasis on eyewitness testimony was another part of the

tradition's heritage from Greek pre-Socratic philosophy. In good Greek fashion, Josephus thus

placed his claim to be an eyewitness at the front of his account: 'I)orlTrroc Ma 0(ou wrTra c e

'IEpooo3iuwv ilpeuc; awvOC Te 'P-vi[C 'rroUC erToaqi(w Tv Trp2a KCm TOIC iuoepov

Trapaawuv e' &v'yK|l ("I myself, Joseph son of Matthias, a priest from Jerusalem, fought the

Romans at first and was forced to be present for what happened later").40 Similarly, a good

historian was expected to maintain some semblance of neutrality and objectivity and refrain from

excesses of either praise or blame in his account. This is evident as early as Homer. Similarly, in

Herodotus barbarians are generally portrayed sympathetically, not as inherently evil. In keeping

with this aspect of the tradition, Josephus presented his claim to objectivity in Bellum Judaicum

1.9: Ou0 [Ufv ey4 TOIC ETraLpouoL vm 'Pw[aiLv lVTL4)LjOVELKG)V yuioELV T T63pv 6Oo4~u.. .v

6LEyvGov diU T [I pev 'epya [LE' CKpLpeLa f poTdpTpgv 6L'etiteL ("Now I have resolved not

to magnify the deeds of my countrymen out of jealously against those who exalt the Roman

deeds, but I am recounting the deeds of both with accuracy").

There is, in Greek historiography, a precedent for establishing the authority of the

historical account in some way. Marincola observes that whereas in myth the authority is

guaranteed by the muse, in history the authority is vouchsafed by the author himself.41 How this

was achieved in practice varied. Herodotus constantly appears in the first person in his narrative

to provide testimony to what is presented, but Thucydides rarely interjects himself into his

account. His method instead was instead to write a seamless account that has the appearance of

being the presentation of the facts. "The narrative homogeneity of Thucydides is meant to inspire


40 BJ 1.3.
41 Pp.4-5.









confidence."42 Polybius appears as a mixture of these two methods. "The Polybian narrator

combines a largely unobtrusive narrative of the deeds with a highly intrusive explicator of that

narrative."43 Close to Thucydides' method was Xenophon, who is so unobtrusive in his Anabasis

as to be nearly anonymous.44 Josephus followed a path somewhere between that of Xenophon

and Polybius. Outside of the introduction to the Bellum Judaicum, Josephus does not often speak

in the first person. He preferred, like Xenophon, to treat himself in the third person as a true

character in the narrative. Yet Josephus was not adverse to interjecting explanations and

comments, like Polybius, and thus presented himself as the fairly typical Greek author.

While the foregoing discussion does not exhaust the list of things that were common to,

or defined, Greek historiography, it shows that Josephus was consciously tapping into that

tradition. No educated reader in his day would have missed the fact that Josephus was presenting

his account according to the standard form for Greek historiography. Given the circumstances in

which Josephus wrote (specifically, the anti-Jewish climate), and the thorough-going nature of

his use of these models, surely more was involved in the Bellum Judaicum than an author paying

lip-service to a literary genre. My contention is that Josephus saw in the use of the paradigm of

Greek historiography a way of fitting the Jews into the larger, well-accepted cultural paradigm of

the ancient noble Greeks.

Josephus went beyond adopting the formal elements of the Greek historiographical

tradition. He also adopted specific situations from it as types for his presentation of the Jews. For

example, he adopted from Herodotus the paradigm of a clash between a superpower and an

underdog. For Herodotus, the superpower was Persia, who threatened the Greek homeland and


42 Marincola 9.
43 Marincola 10.
44 Marincola 10.









its smaller forces. Polybius engaged this same paradigm as he chronicled the rise of Rome over

the Greek states, arguing that resistance was futile and Roman domination was inevitable. For

Josephus the superpower is Rome, and the underdog is the Palestinian Jews. There was some of

this in Thucydides as well, in the well-known Melian dialogue in 5.17 of his History. There the

Athenians demanded that the island of Melos capitulate to them, underscoring their demand with

a reminder that the Athenians possessed the greater military force on that occasion. The

Athenians portrayed themselves as a much greater power which the Melians could never

withstand. The dialogue there was echoed in the speech which Josephus himself delivered to the

Jerusalem Jews, on behalf of the Romans, in Bellum Judaicum 5.367. Another example appears

in Bellum Judaicum 1.373ff, where Josephus has Herod making a speech to his troops who were

discouraged over a military defeat and the havoc wreaked by an earthquake. This is similar to the

scene in Thucydides (2.60ff) where Pericles delivered a speech to the Athenians after they had

suffered invasion of their homeland and a devastating plague.45 Also, the account of the report of

the news that Jotapata had fallen to the Romans46 is reminiscent of the account in Thucydides

(8.1) of the failure of the Sicilian expedition,47 and Josephus' description of the nature of the

OTUdOL in Jerusalem "is clearly inspired by" Thucydides' description of the orTOL( in Corcyra

(3.82f).48 In fact, Mader has argued that Thucydides' narrative of the Corcyrean affair "shimmers

like a subtext through BJ often enough to suggest that it provides a stable point of reference."49




45 Thackeray notes this in vol. 2 of the Loeb edition of Josephus, p. xvii, as does Mader 6.
46 BJ 3.432.
47 Thackeray's Loeb edition, II xvii. This kind of borrowing also appears in the AJ, where
the description of Herod's disease (17.167ff) closely follows Thucydides' description of the
symptoms of those who suffered in the plague in Athens (Th. 2.49.2-6). D. Ladouceur, 'The
Death of Herod the Great', CP 76 (1981) 28-30.
48 Eckstein 178.
49 Mader 56.









More specific examples are available. It is well-known that the Bellum Judaicum has

several clear verbal or paradigmatic echoes of Thucydides' History, so much so that recent

treatments of Josephus no longer bother to cite the parallels. It is useful for the present study,

however, to rehearse some of these briefly. There are close verbal parallels as Josephus gives an

overview of the political context of the war:


Thucydides


1.1 ... KLiCOVUrE rTe fToCV Eg aLrUTv
c6oTepoL TrcpaoCKEu TT TC KOT KCL T6O ao
'EXXTIVLKbv 6po3v UVLOTCFlevov TrpbO EK(TEpou
Tb ietv EvuO,, TO 6E KCaL 6Lavoo6tEVOV. KLVT1OLc
y&p aUcUT 6] [eyLOTti|' TOLe EXXTiOLV EYEVETO
[tEpL 'tLVL TVTV paPUppov, .

(" both sides were complete in all the
preparations for it, and seeing the other Greeks
united against the others, some immediately,
others contemplating it. Indeed this was the
greatest uproar among the Greeks and among a
certain part of the barbarians .")


Josephus Bellum Judaicum


1.4 yevoi.Evou yap 03 'i E'v eyloroou To6e
TO) KLV"pVrTOt v 'PT0LOL E tV EVOOE L T&
OLKELL 'IOUic(L)V 6OE TOb vE(orpLov OT
TETapay[iEvoL; ETravEioTr TOL( KCLpOL; UK[COV.



("For when, as I said, this greatest of uproars
happened, of the internal affairs of the Romans
were in disorder, and the revolutionary party of
the Jews then arose and flourished when the
times were ripe.")


A few more verbal similarities appear as both authors claim that the war of which they wrote was

the greatest in the world's history:


Thucydides

1.2 KLVTIOL( y&p ai'rU 61 [teyLorTi TOiL
EXXTiOLv EYEveto ~ipEL TLV VTov pUppppov,
We 6e EL'TrELV KUL ETrrL TrXELoTov xvOpG)TrU)v. TC&
yap Trpb aucJUTV KoL T& 'E"T TrcXLcaTEPpac oa(xO)
iEv eupelv 6Lt Xpovou TrXOo9 ao6UvaCTOV 'v,
EK 6i TtEKpipLP ) V 6v' ETri tcKpTraTov
OKOTrOUVTL lOL TTLOTEUOcL U[paLVEL, Ou 4eycEYA
vol') yevEioOUL ouTE KaT& TOi( Troxiqoui
OUTE E( TCU cXxca.

("For this was the greatest upheaval that
happened among the Greeks, and among a
certain part of the barbarians, and as one might
say, the majority of mankind. For it has been
impossible to discern the full picture, because
of the passing of time, concerning the things


Josephus Bellum Judaicum

1.1 'ETrEL6j TOb 'IoU6Uai)v Trpb6 'PowaULouI
roXE0ov ouoTaCVTC 4lytLoTov o0 .6vov TWV
KcUO' 't4 C oXE6ov 6e KCL o'v U(KOI
TrcPELX'4L[EV t ie TrToXEoV Trpb6 TrO6tXEL i ieOv(;v
'iOveoL ouppcyyvTtov .





("Since the war of the Jews with the Romans
has been the greatest ever engaged, not only of
those that have been in our times, but nearly of
all those that we have heard of; either of those
of cities fighting against cities, or nations
against nations .... ")











before these events and the more ancient
things; but by my considering proofs to the
fullest extent it has turned out that I have come
to believe that I do not think greater things
have happened either in wars or other
things.").

Thackeray lists six more cases where it is clear that Josephus has borrowed the vocabulary of

Thucydides, nine cases of verbal indebtedness to Herodotus, six for Xenophon, six for

Demosthenes, and others for Homer, Sophocles, and Virgil.5S

As for paradigmatic parallels, Josephus follows Thucydides in claiming that his account

rises above the normal tendencies of exaggeration and only reports the truth:


Thucvdides


Josephus Bellum Judaicum


1.21.2 KCL 6 TrroqtExo OUUTo, KaULTrp T~6v
U&vOp6rrTrv ev c 6i'v &v TrOXE(tG)OL T6V TrapovTwa
aLEL [lEyLoTov KpLvovrov Trauoa Fivov 6E TC&







("And so this war, although the men who fight
in it always judge it to be the greatest one, and
it f



when it is over they wonder more at earlier
ones, from observation of their deeds it will be
clear that it was much greater than those that
happened before.")


1.2, 12 oi TrUapayevo4tevoL 6'e i KOXaKdE TT,
Trpo6 'P ULCtaOU Ti LLO EL TTp66 'Iou6aLoul
K(XTXi-EU6OVTcXL Th)V TrTp(XyoUT)V TrEPLEX'L 6X


out6ax4o0 .. yohv irrdtvrov dtrr' (aL3voh
dTuXlcTaXa Trp6j T& 'Iou6ai)5 v TiTrfO9aL 60KG)
KaraCF OUyKpLOLV.

("Those who were present, either for flattery to
the Romans or for hatred against the Jews, lie
about the events, and the things written by
them contain either accusation or encomium,
but nowhere the historical truth. The
misfortunes of all men from the beginning of
the world seems to me to be inferior, by
comparison, to those of the Jews.")


And in a similar way Josephus follows Thucydides in defending the writing of a factual account

that may read dryly over an account written for entertainment:


50 Loeb edition, II xvii.


Thucvdides


Josephus Bellum Judaicum










ThcyId JoehsB/ur uacr


1.22.4 KaL E' iev d(KpoaoLv 'LOGW TOb T
Lu0GO56E AUciTV l~TEpTrEoTEpoV oaVETw a i0sOL
6e poia r'ooVTL T)oV TE Ye yvoiEvov TO oha()
OKOTTeLV KCaL T(v o lEXX6ovTW TrOTE aUiOL KTlar
TO dvOpjTrrTLVOV TOLOU'VTOV KOL TrXpXTTArTOLGo)V
E oeOcL, ()EaXL, KpLVELV alji a pKoU VTW
EEL. KTri[W TE Ec U(LEl [i&LXXOV iT &yUvLoLa Ec
TOb TapaXpfLtaX (KOUE-LV UyKELTUCL.

(" ... And likewise the lack of what is
mythological will appear, to the hearing,
boring; but if as many as wish to know the
exact truth about the things that have
happened, and of such things and similar
things that will happen again according to
human experience, judge these things to be
beneficial, it will be enough. It has been
written as a possession for all time rather than
as a show-piece for momentary hearing.")


1.15-16, 30 T6 ye [iT1v [viptn rT
TrpOiTOpr ooeVTs 6L6OVimL KfO TC&o TwV 6Lo)V
Xpoveov r^or is a task ouv' ofv prais 'an
XPOVU)V TOL [LET' (XUTOV OUVLOTCiVELV E'TrCLVOU
KUCL L(XpTupLC CLOV .. TLo(,o ) 65i Trrap'
TIlLV TO Trfl LOTOpopLUX cXTIOE' ETrEL Tr ap'
"EXXtiroLv .TeiErleTL ... yE TrtV XicA i'OELiv
UycUTrcOLV L XX&L tp6 T rp6 15ov'iv dvEypcaUc.


("Offering the memory of what has not been
previously recorded, and putting together the
affairs of one's own time for those who come
afterward, is a task worthy of praise and
declaration. ... Yet let that which is true in
history be preferred by us, since it has been
neglected among the Greeks ... and I have
written it for those who love the truth but not
for those who love pleasure.")


Mader notes additional correspondences in Bellum Judaicum 4.131-4 (= Th. 3.82-3), 4.319-21 (=

Th. 2.65), 5.367 (= Th. 1.72.2 and 5.105.2), and 6.136-40 (= Th. 7.44).51 E. Stein has catalogued

allusions to Greek authors at the rate of between two and four allusions per page in the Bellum

Judaicum,52 and Druner's examination of the evidence led him to conclude that Josephus' use of

Thucydides was deliberate.53

It is possible that Thucydides served as more than a verbal or paradigmatic template for

Josephus, because aspects of ethnicity also played a role in Thucydides' presentation of the war.

Price notes that "... the Hellenes fighting the war engaged in radical redefinition of the entity

Hellas, to which they all claimed proprietary rights in a way which excluded their opponents."54

This is typical of how ethnicities are constructed, especially for imperialists. To say that



51 P.6.
52 Pp.58-68.
53 P.34.
54 J. Price, Thucydides andInternal War (Cambridge 2001) 328.


Thucvdides


Josephus Bellum Judaicum









Josephus saw this feature of Thucydides' work and adopted it for his own ends might beg the

question of how much Josephus actually knew and understood the History. However, the

consensus of modern scholarship is that Josephus was himself well acquainted with the work of

Thucydides,55 and it is not inconceivable that this feature of the History was not lost on Josephus.

At the very least it shows that Josephus' purpose was not inherently contradictory to his models

and therefore it was not out of line for Josephus to use Thucydides as a model for describing a

war in which cultural identity played a role.

Eckstein thinks Josephus used Polybius as his primary model.56 He argues that Josephus

used Polybius on both the conceptual and the verbal levels. Specifically, Josephus' description of

the Roman army in Bellum Judaicum 3.70-109 (which contributes nothing to the narrative itself)

draws heavily on Polybius' description in 6.19-42. Josephus emphasizes the importance of a

historian having political and military experience and being an eyewitness to and participant in

the things he relates; he is willing to overlook the failure of another historian to tell all the truth

of a matter; he is willing to tell the whole story even though it may prove embarrassing to his

own people; he is conscious that his emotional involvement in the story he relates may interfere

with the proper telling of history; he blames the loss of the conflict on the ineptness of some of

his own fellow-countrymen; he writes about a conflict that engulfs the entire Mediterranean

basin; he writes contemporary history (in the Bellum Judaicum); he provides a table of contents

at the beginning of the work; he writes for those who "are lovers of truth"; he has a resignation

and a conciliatory tone towards Rome and its power; he blames the irrational youth of some of

his countrymen for the start of the war; he appeals to u-Xrl as a factor in the rise of Rome's


55 Mader 5.
56 P.207. Similarly, Petersen (266-72) has suggested that in six places in the AJwhere
Josephus claims that a topic has been covered, when in fact it has not (AJ 12.390; 13:36, 61, 108,
119, and 186), the referent is to coverage in Polybius.









prominence, and he says that that Roman success was inevitable. All of these features of the

Bellum Judaicum have direct parallels in Polybius, and Eckstein argues that in some of them,

Polybius can be the only model Josephus could have followed. He observes that "Polybius

revealed to Josephus a good Hellenistic explanation of events, one that would obviously be

acceptable to a Greek-speaking audience, and one that carried the additional advantage of

exonerating much of the Jewish population from responsibility for the Revolt."57

Champion has shown that Polybius portrays the Romans as in keeping with the best

traditions of the ancient Greeks. "Romans are incorporated as part of the Hellenic cultural

commune, and Polybius presents them with didactic and admonitory lessons for preserving their

polity in its optimal condition."8 Josephus, like Polybius, wrote to demonstrate that a group that

had come to be hated by some (for Polybius, the Romans; for Josephus, the Jews) in fact

exhibited some of the best ideals of that model of nobility, the ancient Greeks. Both authors were

holding up a nation as worthy of respect and awe because of its affinities to Greek ideals. In

doing so, both authors interjected ethnicity into their presentations.

Debate over whether Josephus' primary model was Thucydides or Polybius is not crucial

for this study. It is possible, if not likely, that no one author served as primary model for the

Bellum Judaicum. I have already noted that Josephus drew on a number of themes from several

Greek historians. What is important is the implication of Josephus' extensive use of Greek

historical models. Are these examples simply a case of a later historian paying homage, through

mimesis, to his literary predecessors according to Hellenistic convention? Or is there more to it

than this? I suggest that Josephus wrote not simply to discourage anti-Jewish sentiment, but to

make a positive statement about the Jews, and in doing so he tapped into a characteristic of


57 P.93.
58 C. Champion, Cultural Politics in Polybius' Histories (Berkeley 2004) 99.









Greek historiography that was in vogue in his day. The remarks of Mader summarize the point

well. After referring to a few of Josephus' uses of Thucydides and Polybius, Mader says:

Intertextual allusion of this kind is not just a matter of formal ornatus, but implies also an
interpretive intent: Josephus by invoking recognizable frames and models suggests
analogies and parallels in a manner which would engage his Greco-Roman readers in their
own cultural terms, and which thus adds subtle nuance to his narrative. From this
perspective the 'Hellenizing glass' serves as a medium for implied authorial comment,
predisposing the reader to a particular interpretation of the historical data.59

In light of the fact that the Jews of the first century were struggling for acceptance in the wider

Hellenistic culture, and that Josephus was writing for the Greek-speaking world of his day, it

would seem that more than mimesis is going on here. Josephus is instead characterizing. These

phenomena suggest that Josephus had a purpose in mind for how he wanted his account, and the

people in it, to be understood.60 The clear echoes from the opening of Thucydides' Histories

immediately brings the reader to think of the conflict of the ancient Greeks and the story in the

Bellum Judaicum in the same terms, and to see the people (the Jews) of the Bellum Judaicum as

in some way parallel to the ancient Greeks. This becomes even more apparent in light of the fact

that this frequent use of the Greek historiographical tradition was not consistent across Josephus'

writings. In particular, his Antiquities have an observable "Isocratean-Dioysian slant," whereas

the Bellum Judaicum has "a conscious Thucydidean-Polybian orientation."61 The use of the

Thucydidean-Polybian model in the Bellum Judaicum seems to be deliberate and suggests that it

was designed to invite implicit comparison between Josephus' subject and that of Thucydides.

As Mader notes, "Josephus brings to bear the classical categories ... on his Jewish narrative

apparently with an eye to informed readers (Greeks, Romans, Hellenized Jews) and in a manner


59 P.9; he alludes to Rajak, Josephus: The Historian andHis Society, 103. Although
Mader is arguing for a different use of the Greek historiographical tradition than we are arguing
in this paper, he bases his approach on this same intertextual phenomenon.
60 Cf Mader 5.
61 Attridge, 'The Interpretation of Biblical History', 44-50.









that activates prior knowledge and associations, and so steers (or at least potentially affects)

reader-response through allusion to common frames of reference ...."62 Whereas Mader suggests

that Josephus' use of Thucydides and the Greek historiographical tradition in general serves to

give the impression of rationality to an account that is really nothing more than subjective

polemic,63 I suggest that Josephus' employment of that tradition alternately, or additionally,

served to provide an ethnicity for Hellenistic Jews.

Some Greek Elements Within the Bellum Judaicum

Is there anything to which we might look in Josephus that would demonstrate that

Josephus' wrote with a specifically ethnic slant or purpose? Three examples stand out. First, as

noted above, Josephus, like his model Polybius, appeals to u'64 as a factor in Rome's success.

In fact, 'Irl appears twenty-two times in the narrative. In Bellum Judaicum 1.45 Josephus

reports that TrXA OEL 6i uTrEepEXovr oL PCFOLALKOL KCO L 6E L& XpriodCtvoL UX1T KpcrouoL ("the

king's forces, being larger and having luck on their side, were victorious"). For a Jewish writer,

this is amazing for at least two reasons. First, Josephus tells us that the Pharisees ascribed all

events to destiny and to God.65 As a Pharisee, we would expect Josephus to have been satisfied

with taking this course in explaining the Jewish defeat, but he was not. Second, Josephus'

introduction of r~6r into the account is amazing especially in light of the fact that Josephus had


62 Mader 8.
63 Mader 4.
64 ',uUI came into Greek historiography through the influence of Greek tragedy. C.
Fornara, The Nature of History in Ancient Greece and Rome (Berkeley 1983) 125-7.
65 BJ2.162. Greek: et Lcp4i TE K EL ( o TrpooTrrTOUOL TrwVTX. Cf. AJ 13.172: o o pev ov
cJapLodo(LL TLVO KCL 0ou TraLV lx 'Urf E[4UP4EVTc EYOpyoV E[vaL XEAyoUOLV ULV& 6' E4' Ea'UUoic
uTrPXEtLV oulpacUVELV TE KMIL [4i1 yLvEOUcL ("The Pharisees say that some things, but not all things,
are the work of fate, and some things happen by our own doing and do not come about [by
fate]"); cf 16.398. The two were perhaps not necessarily seen as exclusive, but understanding
Josephus' descriptions, and the relationship between these two forces, has proved difficult. Cf G.
Moore, 'Schicksal und freier Wille in der jidischen Philosophie bei Josephus', in A. Schalit
(ed.), Zur Josephus-Forschung (Wege der Forshung 84, Darmstadt 1973) 167-89.









another, competing factor in place in his account to explain the Roman victory at Jerusalem: the

favor of the God of the Jews. It is a major theme in the Bellum Judaicum that the Jews lost the

war because fanatical rebels angered God by their pollution of the temple, and thus God favored

the Romans and gave them victory as punishment for the rebels' impiety. OE6; 6' iv &pac 6

'Pt0icdOL T& Frc XLXaov TraOIrl XapLC6(d0vo ("It was God favoring the Romans for the calamities

of the Galileans").66 Josephus himself warned the inhabitants of Jerusalem saying OE6( &ppa bOE6

acb'6 EiPryEL [E 'PU4a4ico v KccapoLV cXUr~c Tr"wp KUCL Triv ToooUToV [LLUXO[LTo)V yEtiouoaCV Tro'XLV

avapTrrdCt ("It is indeed God, God himself, urging on with the Romans a cleansing fire for

himself, and he is plucking up the city that is full of such defilements").67 In fact, Josephus

presented himself as the prophetic author of this explanation, for which reason the Romans

spared his life at Jotapata. That is, Josephus presented this explanation as coming from God.

Now Josephus already had a perfectly good explanation for the Roman victory at

Jerusalem, one that Jewish readers would have found to be perfectly orthodox, especially

because a similar theology was found already in the canonical book of Jeremiah, which

discussed the Babylonian destruction of the city.68 Even for non-Jewish readers, the concept of

the gods being on the side of the victor had a long history, going back to Homer, as part of the

religious milieu of the ancient world. It would have made good sense to a non-Jewish reader if

Josephus had left the matter as a case of victory by the help of a deity. Therefore Josephus did

not need to tap into the concept of Trl in order to explain the outcome of the war either to Jews







66 BJ 3.293.
67 BJ 6.110. He puts the same sentiment in the mouth of Agrippa II in 2.390-94.
68 S. Cohen, 'Josephus, Jeremiah, and Polybius', History and Theory 21 (1982) 370-7.









or Gentiles. Yet Josephus added this element to his account, creating tension with the other

explanations.69 Why?

Perhaps Josephus thought that a theological explanation of the war's outcome would have

been ultimately unsatisfying to his pagan readers. After all, Josephus presents the war not just as

another war, but as an event comparable to the Peloponnesian War, a war that forever changed

the world. Momigliano has observed that "Though Tyche might appeal to a pagan historian, no

personal god was ever invoked to explain the course of history."70 After Herodotus, gods play no

direct role in historical explanation. Instead the gods became the instrument of overriding rX.71

So perhaps the idea of a world-changing war directly determined by the personal God of the

Jews was, in Josephus' judgment, too Jewish of an explanation. UXTrl provided a less personal

explanation and even made the presentation somewhat Thucydidean, since in Thucydides there

was a thread that decisions made by human beings were also part of a larger divine plan.72

Squires has noted that a concept of divine providence can be discerned in the classical historians,

and that Josephus' Jewish theological views enabled him to capitalize on this theme,73 but

appealing to XTrl aligned his description with Greek conventions. In short, an appeal to uXxT

would have made better sense to his Hellenistic readers. Whatever the reason, Josephus' use of

this term that had a well-known place in Greek thought shows that Josephus was deliberately

casting the story in specifically Greek terms, thus making the story appear closer to Greek

experience than it could have been portrayed otherwise. By interjecting u'Xrl into the account,



69 S. Cohen notes ('Josephus, Jeremiah, and Polybius', 372) that Josephus' use of the
term tuy r is not consistent.
70 Momigliano, 'Tradition and the Classical Historian', 284.
71 Price, 'The Provincial Historian in Rome', 116-7.
72 Rhodes 158.
73 J. Squires, 'Hellenistic Historiography and Philosophy in Josephus' Account of the
Jewish History', Australian Journal of Jewish Studies 4 (1990) 148-54.









Josephus was explicitly painting the Jews in Greek dress, and implicitly declaring that the

experiences of the Jews paralleled those of the Greeks. The Jews, for literary purposes, have

become Greeks.

A second indicator of the specifically ethnic function of Josephus' use of Greek

historiographical models can been seen in how he seemed to downplay those things that were

specifically and uniquely Jewish. While this program is most noticeable in the Antiquitates

Judaicae, rewriting for the purpose of making the material appear more Greek also characterizes

the Bellum Judaicum. For example, the various sects of the Jews are presented as philosophies74

to make them appear more Greek. Specifically, the Essenes are said to live the same kind of life

as the Greek Pythagoreans,75 the Pharisees are said to be like the Stoics,76 and his descriptions of

the Sadducees and Epicureans have much in common.7 Closer inspection reveals, however, that

the Pharisees, Sadducees, Zealots, and Essenes had little in common with the classical Greek

notions of philosophy. The term LXooo(L a of course had a long history and had come to denote

Greek speculative thought on the nature of the world and existence (including the role of the

gods). The Jews, however, historically shunned such speculation since they believed their sacred

texts provided answers to the kinds of questions the Greeks asked. Josephus' choice of terms, in

spite of the fact that they did not accurately describe the institutions of Jewish culture, indicates

his desire to paint the Jews with a Greek brush politically and socially. In fact, Josephus could

have cited Greek approval for his choice of terms. Theophrastus, Aristotle's successor in the






74 BJ 2.119ff.
75 AJ 15.371.
76 Vit. 12.
77AJ 10.277f and Ap. 2.180.









Peripatetic school, referred to the Jews as "a philosophical race."8 In Josephus' defense, the

term "philosophy" was broad enough that it could encompass the peculiar theological traditions

of the Jews. There was no single word in the ancient world that comprehensively denoted what

our word "religion" denotes. "Philosophy" was the closest term,79 but at the same time its use by

Josephus did not denote quite what it meant among Greeks.80 Josephus took advantage of this

ambiguity to create the impression of alignment between Greek and Jewish culture on this point.

This technique of painting the Jews with a Greek brush is seen to be all the more bold

when one notes that Jews and Greeks were significantly different in many ways. The Jews

classically were a nation who lived in a territory with a capital city, Jerusalem. The Greeks,

however, classically had no capital city. Instead the Greeks lived in several independent TrodIEL.

Jewish religion was monotheistic and centered in one place in the ancient world (Jerusalem), but

Greek religion was polytheistic and had shrines everywhere. The Jews had a Torah, revealed by

their God, that dictated morality. For the Greeks, the gods were not sources of moral instruction.

Ethics was instead the purview of speculative philosophy. Jewish law contained dietary strictures

that applied to everyday life, most notably abstinence from pork. The Greeks had no such

customary restrictions. The Greeks were a seafaring people, but the Jews were not. The

differences can easily be multiplied. Josephus consistently smoothed over or ignored significant

differences between Jewish and Greek ethnicities and recast the former to look as much as

possible like the latter.




78 In Porph. Abst. 2.26. From the fragment it does not seem that Theophrastus had
anywhere near an accurate knowledge of Jewish beliefs and customs. W. Jaeger, 'Greeks and
Jews: The First Greek Records of Jewish Religion and Civilization', JR 18 (1938) 131-4.
79 M. Smith 79.
80 Cf Green 501: "Hellenistic Greeks...thought of Jews as a race of philosophers (a view
sustainable only by the failure to read anything they actually wrote...)."









Both of the examples above show that Josephus was making conscious choices about his

presentation of the Jews. In the former example, Josephus was adding an element of explanation

to the story that was unnecessary from a Jewish point of view, but one that would have greatly

increased the Hellenic characterization of the story and its peoples by its addition. In the latter

example Josephus was suppressing elements of Jewish ethnicity that one would otherwise expect

to find in a Jewish description of Jewish culture, elements that would have made the Jews appear

un-Greek, and has instead re-cast a major component of Jewish ethnicity in purely Greek terms.

These techniques, along with his heavy use of the Greek historiographical tradition throughout,

led the ancient reader to see the Jews in much the same way as that same reader would have

encountered the Greeks in the works of the recognized, authoritative Greek historians.

Perhaps the most noticeable evidence within the Bellum Judaicum that Josephus was trying

to bridge the divide between Roman and Jewish relationships appears in his treatment of the

emperor Titus who, at the time of the Jewish revolt, was the officer in charge of finishing the

campaign. As I have tried to demonstrate in chapter three, Roman-Jewish tensions were high in

the first century CE. Josephus needed to soften Roman views of Jews and to present a view of

Titus that was not antagonistic toward Jews if there was to be a successful negotiation on the part

of Jews into Roman society. The former of these tasks involved explaining that the war was

started and prosecuted by a handful of Jews who were bent on making trouble.81 The rest of the

populace involved in the conflagration was, according to Josephus, quite unwilling to be in that

situation. This may have been an attempt to counter a notion that Jews in general across the

Roman empire were eager for a revolt. In 1.5 we hear what sounds like an echo of this rumor:

eTTrL6T 'Iou6XiLOL iJ V rraVv Tb 33r0 p EipcTirv 6[L6u)Xov oUVTrcUpOrtoeoOcaL O4LAOLV ijXTrLoav ("For



81BJ 1.10; 2.290, 330; etc.









the Jews hoped that their fellow-country from beyond the Euphrates would join with them"). The

insurrectionists apparently envisioned this as a great war of east versus west, and mention of this

little fact is reminiscent of the Herodotean presentation of groups in terms of polarities.

Discrediting this idea of a war of Jews versus the world required presenting Titus as God-fearing

and pious, respectful of the Jews and their great religious institution, sympathetic and unwilling

to bring calamity on the Jews. In short, Josephus needed to show that, from the point of view of

an authoritative Jewish historian, Jews did not view Titus as their arch-enemy. If this point could

be established, Roman perceptions of Jews could be softened.82

According to Josephus, Titus did not want to destroy the Jewish temple. In the introduction

to the Bellum Judaicum Josephus set the tone for the reader and said that the Romans attacked

the Jews unwillingly (XE^pac LKo6oaUc) and Katoap TLro( kv TravuCi Tro~ toit bA v pev 6fiov

EXEToca UTTr6 To)V OCaoLCTcoL V ppoupou06iVOV TTOUXXKLK 65 EK6)v T V cUXOvLV a Tfl TrOTXEWo

UTrEpTLOEi4VOc KCL 6L6Oib TZ TrOXLOpKi' XPOvov E'L [lETUVOLtV TiGV aLrOVv ("Titus Caesar

throughout the whole war pitied the people who were being held by the rebels, and often

willingly held off the taking of the city, and gave time for repentance for those who started it

while the siege was underway").83 In fact, he set this tone twice in the preface, to make sure that

the reader understood that this was the proper interpretive grid through which the history was to

be read. After telling how he will describe the coming of the Roman army, the activities of the

rebels, and the place where all this happened, he says: "ETrELTa LGeiEL[L Tr'v TE ()V UUPUvvOa

TTpo6 Troi( 6[o6.Xo u. P406TrrTx Kc( Titv 'P(icaov )4EL66 Trpo aroi O iXXO~Xouv KCL OO(JKLt

TLTro( oCocaL Tliv TroX LV KCL Tbv vaUv EUiTL.uLv ETrIr 6ESLc, TOi~) OaCOLUOV'c TrPKrrpoUKKaXEoaCo.

82 In exonerating the Roman general (and by implication, the army) of much of the
blame, Josephus anticipates Livy, who exonerates Rome of guilt in the Second Punic War and is
generously favorable to Titus Quinctius Flaminius, who ended that war with a crushing victory.
Cf M. Grant, Greek and Roman Historians (London 1995) 72-3.
83 BJ 1.10.









("Then I will recount the fierceness of the tyrants against their own fellow-countrymen, and the

forbearance of the Romans to the foreigners, and how often Titus, wanting to save the city and

the temple, offered the rebels assurances").84 Similarly, in 6.215f, during the siege, Josephus

portrayed Titus as having been left no other choice but to destroy the temple and to press the

revolt to a violent end: Katoap 65 dUTrEXoyeiTO KiL TrEpi TOOU 'T~ r OEc; 4c LOKG)V Trap& ['v a"UroU

'IouaLoL( ELlp'qvirv KCaL CJUOVOiLC'V Trpor'tLveoacL KCaL TU'VTo V U4vrTOTLUcv TWV TETOX4TrLiEvov

Troi 6e UCVT!L 4iLv 6[0ovoi0a O(TCOLV CdVTL 6e ELp'vrc TrOX6eLov Trpo Kopou 6E KCaL EurOTIVLCa XLLbv

("but Caesar exonerated himself before God concerning this, saying that peace and independence

had been offered to the Jews by him, and amnesty for all the wrongs they had done, but instead

of instead of harmony they preferred rebellion, instead of peace they chose war, and rather than a

measure of abundance they chose famine"). In 5.456 he has Titus practically begging the Jews

not to force him to destroy the city, and in 6.95 we are told that Titus even offered to send

Josephus into the city to offer the daily sacrifice (since at this point those who regularly did this

were now dead) and that he had no intention of destroying the temple and offending its God.

Instead he wanted it to stand because it was worthy of admiration as a great foreign edifice,85 and

he expressed regret that it had to end as it did.86 Perhaps even more amazing is the comment that

Titus despaired at the crucifixions of so many Jews who were caught escaping the city,

crucifixions that he himself had ordered for the purpose of instilling fear in those who remained

inside.

Lco/TLyouOLeVOL 6T KaCL TrpopaocavLCo(dvoL TOD Oavdrou Tr&oa (LKLCaV aveoTofupoUVTo TO
TeLXoul &uVTLKpU. TLT tav oiv oLrKrp6v T TrO vOo0 Ka(TE acLVETO Tr(EvrTKOOL(ov EKdOTdrl
ThEpcU ECOTVL 6e OTE KCL TrXELOVVoV lALOK KLEvov ... TO' yE pio v TrOXEov OUlK EK6jXUEV TXo' 3v
EV60oUL Trpo TT1V OjJLV E'XTUrCia amUcOU EL [ill TrcLpaUoLEv Oo0LU TrELoo0EvoufU


84 BJ 1.27.
85 BJ 6.228.
86 BJ7.112-13.









("having first been whipped and tormented to the point of death with every kind of torture,
they were crucified opposite the walls. The suffering brought pity to Titus, as every day
five hundred Jews were being caught, and sometimes more; ... The main reason he did not
hinder it was that he was hoping they might possibly give in at the sight of it, fearing lest
they might suffer the same things").7

What are we to make of all this positive, generous characterization of Titus? Is it true?

Since the corresponding sections of Tacitus have been lost, we have no other contemporary

ancient source by which we may compare it. However, the lost parts of Tacitus were known to

both Sulpicius Severus and Orosius, fourth-century Christian authors, and their accounts of this

event were built on them.88 Both of these later historians reported that Titus deliberated with his

advisers concerning whether or not to destroy the temple (which Josephus confirms in 6.236-43).

The texts are pertinent here. Severus says

Fertur Titus adhibito consilio prius deliberasse an templum tanti operis everteret. Etenim
nonnullis videbatur aedem sacratam ultra omnia mortalia illustrem non oportere deleri,
quae servata modestiae Romanae testimonium, diruta perennem crudelitatis notam
praeberet. At contra alii et Titus ipse evertendum in primis templum censebant ...

("It is said that Titus summoned a council first, to consider whether he should destroy a
temple of such great work. Indeed, it seemed to some that destruction of a holy, illustrious
temple beyond all human achievement was not required, whose preservation was a
testimony of Roman restraint, and whose destruction would offer a lasting mark of cruelty.
Against this, others and Titus himself determined that the temple especially had to be
destroyed ...")89

And Orosius reports

quod tamen postquam in potestatem redactum opere atque antiquitate suspexit, diu
deliberavit utrum tamquam incitamentum hostium incenderet an in testimonium victoria
reservaret ... itaque Titus, imperator ab exercitu pronuntiatus, templum in Hierosolymis
incendit ac diruit.

("after it had been forcefully taken and he had admired its works and antiquity, for a long
time he deliberated whether he should burn it as an incitement of the enemy or preserve it

87 BJ5.449-50.
88 This was demonstrated by J. Bemays, Ueber die Chronik des Sulpicius Severus (Berlin
1861) ii.81-200, as noted by Barnes 133-4.
89 Chronicorum Libri duo 2.30.6-7; text as quoted in Barnes 134-5. The text also appears
in the preface to the Loeb edition of Josephus, II xx.









as a testimony to his victory ... Thus Titus, having been proclaimed imperator by the
army, burned and destroyed the temple in Jerusalem")90

The picture from both authors is that in the end the decision was reached that the temple ought to

be destroyed. Interestingly, Josephus tells us that the final decision was to let the temple stand: 6

65 TLro( ou6' &v ETLPLvrtE ETr' aUTOb TarOXE [o oLV 'IOU&oL LOL TC~ UVTL TW;V dlV6p&)V dUcUVEta0LCL

T& cUlu"( o0U6i KXTa()E)AELV Tro0Th TrXALKOTo0V 'Epyov 'Po4LLo)V yap 'eoeocaL TrTv PALPTriv o5rtEp

KCL K6a ov T fT TYE4LovL (a aCfTro pivovron ("But Titus was saying that even if the Jews should

advance upon it and fight from there, the fighting should not be against inanimate things instead

of men, nor should there ever be a burning of so great a work by the Romans, for that would be

harmful, and it would also be an adornment of their abiding empire").91

So what is the truth here? Barnes believes that "Tacitus' version of the destruction of the

temple must surely be preferred to that of Josephus."92 Given the prevalence of anti-Jewish

sentiment in the Roman world, it certainly seems incredible that a battle-hardened commander

like Titus should be so reluctant to press for a decisive victory in such circumstances. In fact,

Rives has suggested that it might even be possible to detect here the application of a Flavian

policy towards foreign cults that threatened loyalties to Rome and Roman identity. Vespasian, he

argues, would not have seen Jerusalem as the center of a religion as we would see it, but as the

center of a cult that threatened the peace and security of the empire by virtue of its claim to an

alternate authority.93 This, however, may be going too far. As Gruen has noted, the extant

evidence does not support the notion that the Romans felt threatened by the Jews.94 More


90 Historiae adversum Paganos 7.9.5-6; text as quoted in Barnes 135.
91 BJ6.241.
92 Barnes 143. So also W. Weber, Josephus and Vespasian: Untersuchungen zu dem
Judischen Krieg des Flavius Josephus (Hildesheim 1973) 72-3.
93 J. Rives, 'Flavian Religious Policy and the Destruction of the Jerusalem Temple', in J.
Edmondson et al (eds.), Flavius Josephus andFlavian Rome (Oxford 2005) 145-66.
94 Gruen, 'Roman Perspectives on the Jews', 29-37.









realistic, it seems, is the notion that Titus, and Romans in general, were shocked and angered at

the ingratitude the revolt communicated. The Romans had no vested interest in the destruction of

Jews or Judaism, and had bent over backwards to accommodate this unusual people. Now the

Palestinian Jews had started a war, in spite of good treatment from Rome, and there was no way

the Romans were about to let it go unpunished.

The incredulity of Titus' behavior in Josephus' account thus highlights just how far

Josephus was willing to go to present the Romans and Jews as being on favorable terms with

each other. This literary "handshaking" can be interpreted as evidence that Josephus was

attempting to negotiate a way into Roman culture for the Jews. Titus is presented as a pious,

God-fearing man who wished to avoid bloodshed and the destruction of the Jerusalem temple,

but was forced into both by the rebels. Likewise, the majority of Jews are presented not as

victims not of outright Roman hatred, nor as fighting out of hatred for the Romans themselves,

but as trapped by the insane determination on the part of the rebels to fight until the very end.

This distancing of Titus from the decision to destroy the temple also served to put the matter in

God's hands, where Josephus claimed the matter lay from the beginning.

Whether Josephus was simply capitalizing on what appeared to be hesitation on Titus' part

(and Josephus was simply inferring that this meant that Titus did not want the temple destroyed),

or Titus was at one point actually opposed to the temple's destruction, or Josephus felt political

pressure to present his patron in the best light possible and thus simply invented the outcome of

the council, or he willingly contradicted the facts, it is clear that Josephus was manipulating his

material here. Of course, this sympathetic portrait of Titus has contributed greatly to the

perception that Josephus was a traitor to his own people who was simply touting the imperial

propaganda. However, I suggest that if we read Josephus from the point of view of ethnicity,









another agenda emerges that is not so derogatory to Josephus nor as complementary to Titus.95

The picture that Josephus was trying to create was that no one wanted this war except the

minority that made up the insurrectionists, and that both groups were peace-loving people who

had every intention and prospect of getting along otherwise. Titus' reluctance to destroy the

temple in Josephus' telling of the story stands as a gesture of good will toward the Jews

proceeding from the emperor himself. The action is far more significant than a glimpse into

military deliberations in a great war. It becomes a symbol of the imperial attitude toward the

Jews, employed by Josephus to fit his literary aim of demonstrating Roman acceptance of Jews.

It also absolves Josephus of much of the characterization of shamelessly praising his imperial

patron.

Conclusion

It is clear that Josephus followed the Greek tradition of historiography as he composed

his Bellum Judaicum. He imitated that tradition in adopting as his basic subject the theme of a

great, contemporary war between peoples who were foreigners to each other. Like a good Greek

historian he criticized his predecessors and claimed that his work was written as a monument of a

great event for serious seekers of the truth. He wrote from his own personal experience in the

events he related, he established himself as a trustworthy interpreter of the war, he paid careful

attention to the antecedents of the war, and he included tragic elements within the narrative-all

in good Greek fashion. He followed Greek form in laying out the introduction to his work, often

step-by-step with Thucydides, he engaged in verbal echoing or borrowing from well-known


95 Cf McLaren, who has shown that Josephus does not follow stock descriptions of a
good military commander current in his day. 'Josephus on Titus: The Vanquished Writing About
the Victor', in J. Sievers and G. Lembi (eds.), Josephus and Jewish History in Flavian Rome and
Beyond (SupJSJ 104, Leiden 2005) 279-95. He argues that there is implicit criticism of Titus in
this, but it may well also be that Josephus was simply not familiar enough with the stock
conventions to employ them.









Greek authors such as Thucydides and Polybius, and he cast some of the stories in his narrative

in ways that were clearly reminiscent of the types of stories he found in these authors as well.

The Greek historiographical tradition was Josephus' paradigm on several levels. In addition,

Josephus downplayed the Jewish character of some things by putting them in Greek dress. The

Jewish sects became philosophies, and the outcome of the war was determined not by God

alone-which would have been a perfectly acceptable explanation for both Jewish and pagan

readers-but also by the Greek element of u'rT. In the sensitive issue of hostility between

Romans and Jews, Josephus nearly stretched the limits of credibility as he basically absolved

Titus of responsibility in the destruction of the Jerusalem temple. The Roman commander was

portrayed as having been forced, against his personal sentiments, piety, and pleas to the contrary,

to act as he did by the obstinate determination of the rebels. The rebels were to blame, not a

general Roman hatred of Jews or a general Jewish hatred of Romans. The two nations are both

depicted as victims of the rebels' actions; otherwise they would not have fought with each other.

How is all of this to be understood? Scholarship has wrestled with this question and has

produced different answers. Some have suggested that Josephus' use of Greek models is merely

formal, and that nothing more should be read into it. Others have suggested that his use of these

models is part of an integral strategy on Josephus' part, but there is disagreement over what that

strategy was. I believe that Mader was correct in noting that all of this Hellenism was designed to

create and manage a deliberate impression on the reader, and I suggest that one way to interpret

the matter is that Josephus was attempting to build a new ethnicity for Jews in his day. Following

an instrumentalist understanding of ethnicity, it is possible to see these features of the Bellum

Judaicum as Josephus' attempt to negotiate a place for the Jews within the larger (Roman)

culture of his day. Specifically, he was establishing, through a literary construct, a solidarity with









the Greek cultural heritage, thereby attempting assimilation into the Roman world, and engaging

in what modern sociologists call identity politics. A reader of the Bellum Judaicum in ancient

times would certainly have been impressed with how Greek the Jews appear in that narrative,

and how Greek the narrative itself sounded. That reader would have thought that he was reading

a Greek historiography of a people who were like the ancient Greeks themselves in many ways.

By adopting the Greek tradition to tell his story, Josephus was hoping to convince his target

audience (readers in the Greek world) that the Jews were, in substantial ways, just like the

Greeks of the past. If they were just like them, then they ought to be regarded with the same kind

of openness and respect. This mode of reading Josephus need not be exclusive. Josephus was

skilled enough to manipulate his materials for other purposes also, but the desire to design an

ethnicity along Greek lines explains the phenomenon well.









CHAPTER 6
JOSEPHUS' PRESENTATION OF THE JEWS IN HIS ANTIQUITATES JUDAICAE

In the late 80s or early 90s CE, Josephus undertook his most extensive literary project, the

Antiquitates Judaicae. Here he presented a version of Jewish history for a Hellenistic audience.

In this chapter I hope to show that Josephus has manipulated the presentation of this history to

suit an agenda of ethnicity-building. The literature that has arisen in connection with the

Antiquitates Judaicae is vast,1 and a comprehensive look at the Antiquitates Judaicae is neither

possible nor necessary for the present purposes. I hope instead to cite elements of the

Antiquitates Judaicae that demonstrate how it addresses concerns of Jewish ethnicity and to look

at two basic aspects of that work: 1) Josephus' positive presentation of Jewish history and its

great characters, 2) and his management of negative elements. In this latter aspect I will

concentrate on his presentation of the part of that history that was contemporary to him and his

audience (basically the history of the Herodian dynasty in Palestine and Roman rule through

procurators).

The Fluid Nature of Foundational History/Myth

It is important to realize that as Josephus was aligning Jewish piety with Greek in the

Antiquitates Judaicae, at the same time he was preserving elements of Jewish uniqueness.

Josephus accomplished this latter objective by a staunch refusal to compromise anything that

was, in his judgment, essentially Jewish. Nowhere did Josephus attempt to align the God of the

Jews with a pagan deity. Likewise, some institutions which were uniquely Jewish-such as

Sabbath observance-were neither downplayed nor aligned with any practice from paganism.

Josephus had no intention of completely assimilating Judaism into Hellenism (a feat he could


1 Cf L. Feldman, Josephus and Modern Scholarship (1937-1980) (Berlin 1984). The
topical bibliography of works between 1937 and 1980 covers nearly 900 pages, approximately
600 of which relate to the AJ.









have attempted if he so desired), of completely surrendering Jewish identity for a Greek one.

Instead he was doing what everyone else did with stories of national origins: he was taking

advantage of the flexible, plastic nature of those stories in order to craft a particular perception or

to serve a particular end. As I noted in chapter two, the fluid nature of traditions is one of the

things that makes the creation and maintenance of an ethnicity possible.

Myths in the ancient world were incredibly elastic and capable of a wide latitude of

treatment and even of transformation, as the needs allowed and demanded. A cursory look at any

compilation of ancient Greek and Roman myths shows that many variants of the stories existed,

often side-by-side historically. Furthermore, the more remote the myth, the more it came to attain

a symbolic quality and not that of historical fact (cf Herodotus' wrestling with the problem in his

History). The remote antiquity of many of the stories at Josephus' disposal easily lent them, in

the Greco-Roman milieu in which he wrote, to adaptation. Even if a Roman reader knew the

details of these stories from the LXX (which is highly doubtful), he would not have thought it

strange to hear slightly different versions of those stories from Josephus, nor would he have

necessarily thought that Josephus was being deceptive by changing elements of the story for his

audience. "Roman writers, well aware that they were working with legendary material and

malleable traditions, felt free to redesign and embellish within the general framework. They

found no virtue in mere reproduction of predecessors, nor did they regard themselves as

promoting a canonical tale. Their presuppositions had little in common with modern

expectations."2

Josephus took a similar approach to the Biblical stories he retold in the Antiquitates

Judaicae. If he wanted his readers to hear a "standard" version of any of them, he simply could



2 Gruen, Culture and National Identity, 32.









have pointed them to the LXX, easily available in his day, or he could have simply reproduced

the LXX stories as closely as he wished. But in fact he did neither. Instead he chose to relate

those stories in his own words, casting them in ways more easily digested by his Greco-Roman

audience, while still claiming that he was faithful to the canonical ("orthodox") versions of those

stories. In Antiquitates Judaicae 1.17 Josephus therefore says T& ttv oiv &KpLPt TyV kv av mi

Uavaypa^ icLL Trpo*i'v 6 X6yo( KarT TrV OLKELCV Ta Lv ori[avEi TOUTro y&p 6L& ra UrTTl TOLTotLV

rT TrpayTXarTELX iETTrryyELXicU4rv ou6ev Trpoo t; ou6' adu TrUapuXLTrr G ("As I go on, the story of the

things contained in the records will tell accurately, according to the proper order, for I have

promised to do this throughout this treatise, adding nothing nor neglecting anything"). Similarly,

in 10.218 he says

EyKcLXeoT6 6E [OL rLT6'iL ouT 'EKCXTaora TOUToV ULTrayyEXXovTL 6L& Tr|( ypX(fj( ie v TOLi
UpxaioiL EUpLOKG) PLPVioL KCML ycap EU'Ou kv Up^T) Trf LOTTOpLO) Terpk U TO LCOrT'UOVTUX(
TL TTrp'i T' V TpXy[JTGJi)V "i [4E4[o[EVOU 10Fo)xaLOCX4lV [LOVOV TE [ETUX)pxCLELV Tf& 'EPpCLxov
PiPXoui E'LTrGv EL' Trv 'EXX56a yXWTLrav KCL TM(UX 6T(XG )roeLV fiTE TreVpooTLOE TOL(
TrpUy[CaoLV aJUT6ob L56LC( t.rT' 'dUaLpC)v UiTrELoFXriEvoc

("But let no one accuse me for relating every one of these things throughout the work as I
find them in our ancient books. For directly in the beginning of my history, I have been
careful, against those who were seeking something about these matters or who were
finding fault with me, only to translate the Hebrew books, saying them in the Greek
language, and promising to reveal these things neither adding my own ideas to these
matters nor taking anything away.")

Either Josephus lied outrightly (which is hard to believe), or he did not see his presentations of

the Biblical stories as containing any substantial violations with respect to the shapes they bore

in the canonical Hebrew Bible. In fact, Josephus described his Antiquitates Judaicae as a

translation of the Bible.3 I noted above that he presented himself as the analogue to Eleazar in

the Letter ofAristeas, and thus implied that his Antiquitates Judaicae was the analogue to the

LXX. The fact that Josephus presented himself as a prophet also created the impression that

3 Ap. 1.54 (tEOep[4rVEUELv, but interestingly ouyypPcpELV in 1.1); AJ 1.5 (tEOEprTLveltUL);
10.218 ([eraTUp(CELv); cf. 20.261.









Josephus' translation was divinely inspired (which claim was also made for the LXX) and thus

as reliable as the prophetic literature of the Bible itself4 By "translation" Josephus did not

understand a literal rendering, but a dynamic one. The Jews agreed that the truth lay in their

sacred books. What they did when they wrote about them was to interpret, contemporize, and

actualize them.5

There is good indication that Josephus was already aware of variations in the materials he

knew. In the Antiquitates Judaicae Josephus repeatedly demonstrated his knowledge of Hebrew

as he cited and explained the Hebrew words that describe Jewish traditions. Modern research has

concluded, however, that Josephus was basically following the LXX in the Biblical parts of his

Antiquitates Judaicae.6 If this is correct, then Josephus must have known that the LXX versions

of many Biblical stories were not identical in every respect with their Hebrew versions.

Variations in names, geographical details, numbers, genealogies, and details of stories abound

between the two collections. Josephus already stood in the stream of a tradition that knew more

than one version of traditional stories.

As a Pharisee Josephus was also well aware of the many variants or additional details of

the Biblical stories that circulated through the apocryphal and pseudepigraphical literature and

other traditions. These alternate stories were highly esteemed by many Jews. The Pharisees in


4 P. Bilde, 'Contra Apionem 1.28-56: An Essay on Josephus' View of His Own Work in
the Context of Jewish Canon', in L. Feldman and J. Levison (eds.), Josephus' Contra Apionem:
Studies in Its Character and Cniie\i n i/th a Latin Concordance to the Portion Missing in Greek
(Leiden 1996) 103-8.
5 Bilde, 'Contra Apionem 1.28-56', 108-9.
6 K. Krieger, 'Die Funktionen der Septuaginta-Legende in Flavius Josephus' Werken
Antiquitates Judaicae und Contra Apionem,' in Internationales Josephus-Kolloquium (1999)
246-261. Cf also J. Fischer: "Josephus, who in the first four books of his Antiquities gives a
paraphrased and annotated version of the Pentateuch, composed in Greek, relied heavily on the
Septuagint version, as is evident from the many parallel passages." 'The Term DESPOTHS in
Josephus', JQR 49 (1958) 133. There is debate over how much he consulted the Hebrew text,
and if he consulted an Aramaic Targum. S. Cohen, Josephus in Galilee andRome, 35f.









particular accepted more than what was contained in the written Torah and the Jewish sacred

canon. Their adherence to and defense of the oral Torah, which some of them claimed had

authority equal to that of the written Torah, is well known. Although we in modern times have

trained ourselves, when coming to such a variety of traditions, to ask critical questions about

sources, or kernels of historical truth, etc., many Jews of antiquity did not come to these stories

with the same kinds of concerns, at least initially. Since Josephus already believed that the

stories in the Hebrew Bible were not necessarily complete, and that other trusted versions of the

stories existed, it was not difficult for him to reshape those stories for an audience who would

have had trouble appreciating the (Jewish) cultural nuances of the originals.

Josephus was far from alone in this kind of handling of materials from his Jewish tradition.

From a survey of Jewish literature of Hellenistic times Gruen concludes

For Hellenistic Jews writing in Greek, the Scriptures provided stimulus for ingenuity and
creativity. The concept of a fixed and unalterable tradition had not yet taken hold. ...
Composition and interpretation proceeded concurrently, and the idea of established texts
was still in process of formation. The fluidity of the tradition may frustrate modern
scholars. But it gave impetus to writers eager to reshape and revivify narratives long
familiar but conveniently adaptable.

In fact, Jewish authors (including Josephus) were adopting the same kind of approach that the

Romans themselves had taken concerning their own foundational myth, the story of Aeneas. In

another study, Gruen has shown that the myth of Rome's origins was a complicated tangle of

stories that knew many variants. Some of these variants emphasized a Greek origin for the

Romans (which Dionysius of Halicamassus was able to exploit), and indeed that element of the

story never disappeared. "The notion of Rome as a Greek foundation or one with a substantial

Greek component remained alive and well, even at a time when Aeneas might otherwise have



7 E. Gruen, Heritage andHellenism: The Reinvention of Jewish Tradition (Berkeley
1998) 110.









held the field."8 In fact, the retention of the Greek element of the story proved an important part

of the myth for the purposes of Roman self-definition. "It enabled Rome to associate itself with

the rich and complex fabric of Hellenic tradition, thus to enter that cultural world, just as it had

entered the wider political world. But at the same time, it also announced Rome's distinctiveness

from that world."9 The preservation of the Greek element in the myth allowed the Romans to

both compare and contrast themselves to the Greeks at the same time. Otherwise, however, the

details of the story were always somewhat negotiable. Even when Roman historiographical

literature began to flourish, the Aeneas story was not cast in an unalterable form. "... it was

accepted practice at a time when traditions were fluid and particulars susceptible to

manipulation. ... The connection itself delivered the vital message. All the rest was malleable."10

Josephus was taking advantage of this kind of approach to ancient traditions as he set out to

relate Jewish history for his non-Jewish audience in the Antiquitates Judaicae.

Another element that made Josephus' task easier was the fact that it was common

practice in Hellenistic historiography for an author to rewrite his sources extensively. It can be

observed in Aeschines' handling of material from Andocides, Livy's use of Claudius

Quadrigarius, Diodorus of Sicily's incorporation of Agatharcides, and Plutarch's appropriation

of Dionysius of Halicarnassus. "An author was expected to take some liberties with his source.

... He was expected to recast the narrative, to place his own stamp upon it, to use the material for

his own purposes, to create something new. But on the whole he was faithful to the content and

sequence of the original."11 This practice was itself a reflection of the larger phenomenon of




s Gruen, Culture andNational Identity, 19.
9 Gruen, Culture and National Identity, 31.
10 Gruen, Culture and National Identity, 35.
11 S. Cohen, Josephus in Galilee and Rome, 31.









Hellenistic historiography, which was, in this sense, largely a creative endeavor,12 and Josephus

stood firmly within the stream of such creative historical writing for the purpose of creating a

national identity-which is another way of speaking of creating a putative myth of shared

descent for purposes of ethnicity. This creative type of historiography was a wide-spread reaction

to the power of Hellenism that confronted many peoples with a need to define themselves anew

in light of the cultural changes and new cultural forces that had appeared after Alexander the

Great.13

With this flexible approach to both ancient history and to his own method of writing

history, Josephus was cleverly attempting to broker a place for Jews within the Roman world. As

I noted in chapter two, Romans paid homage to their debt to Greece even if only to use the

greatness of Greek accomplishments as the backdrop that set Roman accomplishments in even

greater relief. Roman philhellenism had a double edge. Too much praise of Greek things sounded

like an admission that Roman things were inferior. In a similar way, Josephus was both aligning

the Jewish heritage with the Greek, yet at the same time keeping a measured distance from it. His

approach was neither apathetic aloofness from Roman sensitivities nor shameless surrender of

Jewish cultural values. He needed to establish enough Hellenic qualities in Jewish culture to

create a sense of admiration for it, yet be careful not to overdo it lest it appear as a slight against

Roman greatness or as a competitor to it. Within this strategy was room for display of those

things that were also uniquely Jewish.







12 Although there were dissenting voices such as Polybius and Ephorus, who took a more
rationalist approach. Collomp 287.
13 Mendels 37-45.









Examples of Josephus' Positive Portrayal of Jews and Jewish History
by Means of Greek Models

The Antiquitates Judaicae may be thought of as the foundation for Josephus' program of

ethnicity-building. In order to make the case that Jews ought to be given a respected place within

Roman culture, Josephus needed to demonstrate that Jewish culture embodied the very ideals

that the Romans already respected: those of the ancient Greeks. In this way the presentation of

Jewish culture along the lines of things the Romans already respected became an argument, as it

were, that the Romans ought to extend their respect to the Jews. In fact, if an awareness of the

extensive similarities between Jewish and Greek cultures, institutions, great figures, histories,

etc. did not prompt the Romans to revise their attitudes toward Jews, then the Romans would

have to face the idea that they were being inconsistent at the least, or patently hypocritical at the

most.

Use of Greek Forms, Paradigms, and Terms

The form of Josephus' work is the first suggestion that he was aligning the Jews with the

Greeks: an apxCatooyLca of the Jews14 in 20 books, a clear reminiscence of Dionysius of

Halicamassus' 'PG 4OLK-i apxcatooyL'a also in 20 books. The name and arrangement of the work

announced to its ancient audience that this was Jewish history cast in Greek form, following the

forms and conventions of Greek historiography. Furthermore, as noted above, Dionysius of

Halicamassus attempted to establish the closest possible relationship between the Greeks and the

Romans, so far as to posit a Greek origin for the Romans. While Josephus did not go this far with

the Jews, he hoped to show as many congruencies between Jews and Greeks as he could without

sacrificing his own notion of Jewishness.




14 This is how Josephus describes his work in AJ 1.5.









The arrangement-or rearrangement, as it turns out-of Josephus' material also betrays a

conscious effort to imitate Greek historiography which was, in his day, influenced by rhetorical

theory. In Antiquitates Judaicae 4.196-7 he stated that the legal materials concerning Moses in

the Jewish canon were not in the best arrangement as they stood in the sacred texts, and that he

deliberately set them out in a different order:

Bo6uXoica 6e TrV TrOXLEL'rLav TrpoTEpov ELTrG)v Tc; TE MouoEoc &OLG[LwrL Tri U'pETf|
dMvaXoyouoav KCaL aOE-Lv TrUapE'ov 6L' aX ITTFr TOL( EVTEU[OtEV0 OL Oa T KaO' rti't4 x1pX9OEV
,v E ir Ti rv iV &XXW ov paTrEo ca 6iL'IyrTIoL. yEypaTrca 65 Tra'vO' d) EKELVo0 Ka eXLTrEV
l0)6eV TicGV TTU KAXXUwOTTLO[G) TTPOCOEVOV 01)V O' OTL 4T KCaTEXEXOLTrE MWOUfj.
VEVEWo'pLOT(L 6' Tl^tLV TO KTXT( yEvo; EKKaoTa TacL OTropdc6r1lv y&p U'Tr' EKELvou KWTEXEL')Tir
ypaEw'vT KCL e' / EKaocOV TL Trap&c Tof OEo Tru0oLTo TOUTOu X'pLV awvayKCiLOV 'iyrio0CFriv
Trpo6LxoCTEL'Xo9OXL [iT KCCL TL( ^iLV Trapc& TiOv 6 XoVXA Gv evTuy6vmov r T ypaj) li'lL '
6LTitCxpUTijKIOoL yevTX tL.

("But I wish first to discuss the government, relating what is proper to the virtue of Moses,
and to supply learning to those who encounter through it the things that were according to
our antiquity, and then turn to the narrative of other things. They are all written as he left
them, nothing being added by us by way of ornament nor anything besides what Moses
left. But it has been changed by us, to set in order each according to its kind, for it was left
by him having been written in a in scattered way and as he learned each thing from God. I
thought it necessary to explain this freely beforehand, lest there might be someone from
my countrymen bringing a charge that we have erred with respect to the Scripture.")

In doing so, Josephus was demonstrating a sensitivity to the rhetorical concerns of mrt,

OLKOVO[LCa, and 6LateotL to make his narrative materials more orderly and readily understandable.

In particular, the term oLKOVo[LaC was used by Greek authors to describe the orderly presentation

of material that imparts a sense of continuity to a narrative and makes it easier to follow.15 It is

even possible to detect here the traces of Josephus' further indebtedness to Dionysius of

Halicamassus, who had much to say on the arrangement and development of rhetorical

material.16 That Josephus had Greek rhetorical practice in mind here is clear from the fact that


15 W. Wuellner, 'Arrangement', in S. Porter (ed.), Handbook of Classical Rhetoric in the
Hellenistic Period (Leiden 2001) 51-87.
16 Lys. 15; Isoc. 4; Dem. 15; Comp. 6; Th. L. Feldman, 'Rearrangement of pentateuchal
narrative material in Josephus' Antiquities Books 1-4', HUCA 70-71 (1999-2000) 133-4.









while there was a sense among Jewish authors that foundational stories were elastic, few of them

strayed from the order in which events were presented in the canonical Biblical texts. For

example, Philo of Alexandria, for all of his extensive treatment of the Biblical materials, never

changed the order of the Biblical details. Josephus stands almost alone in taking liberty at this

point, and certainly was unique in the extent to which he was willing to practice it.17 It is thus

another indicator of how Josephus made the Biblical materials fit into a Greek mold.

One overall impression Josephus seems to have been crafting was that the Jewish people

had long been objects of scorn not because they were irreligious, but because they were highly

religious. The problem lay not in the Jews but in the irreligious character of their neighbors, who

did not appreciate their high view of God. This of course, only worked to the shame of these

neighbors, the latest of whom was Rome. Much of the narrative was therefore designed to

highlight the high moral and religious character of Jewish culture.

The first move in Josephus' strategy of building a positive image of Jews was to lay out the

proper understanding of the Jewish God and his role in history. Hence in 1.14 Josephus

explained the controlling idea: the God of the Jews is concerned, above all, with moral virtue,

specifically (&pEr'; 1.20, 23). This virtue is spelled out in the Jewish Law, we are told, and was

demonstrated in the lives of great Jewish historical characters. Those who conform to God's

demand of moral virtue are rewarded and those who refuse to conform to it are punished, and

these rewards and punishments are not reserved for the afterlife but are experienced in the

vicissitudes of the present.18 The destruction of the Jerusalem temple was already interpreted in



17 There are a few exceptions in Pseudo-Philo and the midrashic literature. L. Feldman,
'Rearrangement of pentateuchal narrative material', 132.
18I am not arguing that Josephus' view of God, or his theological outlook, was in some
sense "correct," normative, etc. Josephus' Pharisaic outlook colors his view, to be sure, and his
view was only one of several such competing views among his Jewish contemporaries. In fact,









exactly this way in the Bellum Judaicum-God's retribution against the rebels who desecrated

the holy precincts. Of course, &peti was a quality that had a long and lofty history among the

Greeks,19 if not a diverse one.20 The Greek word had, by Hellenistic times, developed a Semantic

range large enough to encompass many subordinate ideas and was capable of describing the

morality inculcated in the Hebrew Bible without doing much violence to either the word itself or

to Jewish ethics. It is arguably one of Josephus' favorite words, appearing nearly 300 times in his

writings. That it is consciously used for its significance in Hellenic culture is suggested by the

fact that the LXX rarely used the word in the canonical books (seven times total, and never in the

Pentateuch). Josephus was not following the LXX here by this choice of terms. By concentrating

on the moral virtue of Jewish religion, and using a highly-visible Greek keyword for it, Josephus

was able to align the Jews with the same kinds of virtues the Romans already knew from the

Greeks and at the same bypass those elements of religion in which the Jews looked so foreign.

Furthermore, as I have suggested, this becomes an argument: if the Romans are a religious

people, then they ought to respect the high virtue of the Jewish God.

In constructing his ethnic portrait of Jews, Josephus was aware that those religious

elements that were uniquely Jewish were going to be the parts of the story that would be the least

likely to be accepted or appreciated by his Greco-Roman audience, a noble portrait of the Jewish

deity notwithstanding. His strategy in dealing with these things was, time and time again, simply

to convert them to Greek models and effectively eliminate the differences between Jewish and

Greek cultures that had become such obstacles for winning respect for Jewish culture. I have



Josephus' interpretations of Jewish laws or customs are sometimes singular. B. Revel, 'Some
Anti-Traditional Laws of Josephus', JQR 14 (1924) 293-301.
19 See W. Jaeger, Paideia: The Ideals of Greek Culture Vol. 1 (New York 1945), 3-14.
20 See M. Finkelberg, 'Virtue and Circumstances: On the City-state Concept of Arete',
AJP 123 (2002) 35-49.









already noted in my discussion of the Bellum Judaicum that Josephus chose to use the term

(LXooo(LaX to describe Jewish theology. This practice continued in the Antiquitates Judaicae as

well.21 In the introduction to the Antiquitates Judaicae, Josephus said that an inquirer into the

details of Jewish theology would find the endeavor to be "exceedingly philosophical" (XLav

LX6oo0o0).22 He portrayed Jewish envoys to Alexandria as perfectly competent to answer

difficult philosophical questions23 to the point that they gained the admiration of the Alexandrian

philosopher Menedemus.24 In a similar way Josephus portrayed Solomon, whom the Biblical

tradition says was expert in all matters of the natural world (1 Kings 4.29-34), as a philosopher

(he says that Solomon iQLX0oo6rloE "did philosophy"),25 and claimed that the Queen of Sheba

was interested in meeting Solomon because she was a student of philosophy herself.26 This made

Solomon's philosophical ability appear even greater, since the queen was portrayed as one who

would not have been impressed with pseudo-intellectualism.

A glimpse of how Josephus tended to downplay things that were uniquely Jewish may be

seen in his choice of terms for his own people. The designation "Hebrews" occurs 319 times in

his writings, all demonstrably in contexts where Josephus, or a character in his narrative, is

referring to Jews in remote antiquity. In contrast, the term "Jews" appears 1,241 times in his

writings, occasionally side-by-side with the term Hebrews, but most frequently in his history of

his people from the Seleucid period onwards. Harvey has suggested that the term "Hebrews" in



21 AJ18.11, 23; cf. Ap. 1.54.
22 AJ 1.25.
23 AJ 12.99.
24 AJ 12.101.
25 AJ 8.44. Even here, however, Solomon was not engaged in the same kind of activity as
the Greeks had classically pursued, for Solomon's knowledge of the natural world was the
product of the gift of oo(xa from God, a point that Josephus dutifully mentions (8.42) but does
not emphasize.
26AJ8.165.









Josephus' day meant "one who is a good Jew," a Jew who is religiously orthodox and

traditionally pious.27 That is, the term "Hebrew" had a strong ethnic demarcation attached to it

and suggested a separateness from the Gentile world-the very picture Josephus was trying to

dismantle. So, while he did not completely dissociate contemporary Jews from the ancient

Hebrews, he kept the ethnically-loaded term "Hebrews" in the background, in the portion of the

narrative dealing with the distant past.

Another example surfaces in how Josephus repeatedly referred to the Jewish political

system by the Greek term TroXi u.L t or TroXLTELa, spelled out in a 6Lira4Li. The LXX, however,

regularly described the Jewish religious charter as a 6La rKTrl, a covenant with God. For his

account, Josephus suppressed the use of the term that was regular for the LXX, a term that was

not ordinarily used of political charters in the secular Greek of his day. In fact, the word 6LeT9'KT)

does not appear in the Antiquitates Judaicae until 13.349 when Josephus is covering the

background of the Herodian client kingdom, and there it has the ordinary, secular sense of a

"will." It never appears in his retelling of the Biblical story, although the LXX he followed used

the word well over 300 times to denote the special agreement between the Jews and their God.

Josephus decided instead to use a word that was more commonly and more readily

understandable and, even more importantly, culturally connected to Hellenism.28 In doing so,

however, he arguably altered the picture of Jewish government as it stood in the LXX and gave

the Jewish political arrangement a Greek character. This becomes even more significant in light



27 G. Harvey, 'Synagogues of the Hebrews: "Good Jews" in the Diaspora', in S. Jones
and S. Pearce (eds.), Jewish Local Patriotism and Self-Identification in the Graeco-Roman
Period (JSPseudSup 31, Sheffield 1998) 132-47.
28 A similar phenomenon appears as Josephus described Jewish synagogues as oavo6oL, a
term used regularly for the associations and guilds in Graeco-Roman cities. A. Fitzpatrick-
McKinley, 'Synagogue Communities in the Graeco-Roman Cities', in J. Bartlett (ed.), Jews in
the Hellenistic and Roman Cities (London 2002) 63.









of the fact that Josephus took pains to explain other words that were particularly Jewish, such as

the Hebrew words "Sabbath" (as in AJ 1.33), "Israel" (AJ 1.333), and "Adonai" (AJ 5.121) as

well as many Hebrew personal names throughout the narrative. Josephus could have explained

that the Jewish political system was different from what regularly prevailed in Hellenic culture,

and that it was commonly called a 6LaO rKrl, translating the Hebrew term berith. Instead he

presented the matter to his reading audience as if the Hebrew and Greek political arrangements

were the same. The result is that the suggestion that the Jews enjoyed a privileged and exclusive

relationship with God (making them appear aloof and negatively critical) is gone.

Beyond using Greek terms for Jewish institutions, it seems that Josephus stretched the

facts to create the impression that Jews were regular citizens in Greek cities. I briefly mentioned

earlier that the riots in Alexandria in 38 CE were the subject of a response by Claudius in 41 CE,

who demanded that the public disturbances stop and that the Jews not press for more privileges

than they already enjoyed. It is clear from the imperial letter that the emperor did not believe that

Jews were citizens of Alexandria, as he described them as Ev dXX.oTpL( Tr6dXEL TrepLouoLca ("living

in a city not their own").29 The keys to the situation are that citizenship in Alexandria was

considered to be Roman recognition of Greek ethnicity, and, as I have shown earlier, Josephus

seemed to operate on the idea that a Greek was one who was a citizen, or at least a recognized

part, of an established Greek city. In commenting on the emperor's response, Josephus quotes

Claudius as saying that the Alexandrian Jews 'L(io TnrOXLTELa' Trap& TOv pacoLXiv TETEuXOTcd

KaUcLO 4(VEpb6v EYEVETO EK T)oV ypcqi4[Lro)v 'TV Troap' XbJUTOL( Kc(L TOv 6LcaUytU[Lov ("possessed

equal citizenship from the kings. This is clear from the records they have and from their edicts").





29 "The Letter of Claudius to the Alexandrians," in CPJII no. 153 (p.41, line 95).









So, by Josephus' ideas of Greek identity, the Jews of Alexandria were Greeks, and Claudius

himself said so.

The problem here is that isopoliteia was a relationship between Greek cities in which

citizenship in one city was granted reciprocal recognition in the other.30 It is impossible that this

relationship existed between Jews and native Alexandrians, for at least two reasons: 1) there is

no evidence that Greek cities had isopoliteia with non-Greek cities,31 and 2) the Jews lived in the

same city with the Alexandrians.32 Most modern scholars have therefore resorted to attributing a

different sense to Josephus' 'oTIo TroXLTEL('. H. Jones suggested that the Alexandrian Jews

possessed a status between that of full Alexandrian citizens and ordinary aoil, and that the

peoples of such an intermediate group had full civil rights, but not citizenship.33 In other words,

the Jews constituted a (foreign) Tro~reuxa, and they could be called TroXLTcL of that TroxLTEU[a,

but they were not technically TroiTcaL of Alexandria. Josephus, however, would apparently have

us to believe that Claudius' words admitted all Alexandrian Jews into citizenship of that city, and

thus they enjoyed recognition of Greek ethnicity by the Romans.34

Josephus attempted the same thing in other places. In Antiquitates Judaicae 14.185-267 he

cited a long list of documents which were adduced to show that the Romans had always been

friendly and respectful toward the Jews. In one of these citations Josephus referred to a public

inscription, in bronze, set up by Julius Caesar in Alexandria that declared the Jews to be citizens


30 A. Chaniotis, Die Vei i/age zwischen kretischen Poleis in der hellenistischen Zeit.
(Heidelberger althistorische Beitrage und epigraphische Studien 24, Stuttgart 1996) 101-8.
31 Applebaum, "The Legal Status of the Jewish Communities', 438.
32 In the response, Caesar rebuked the Jews for sending their own embassy to him as if
they lived in a separate city.
33 'Claudius and the Jewish Question at Alexandria', JRS 16 (1926) 29.
34 Some Jews were able to manage their way into full Alexandrian citizenship. However,
it also appears that their status as citizens was precarious. CPJII no. 151 is a letter of an
Alexandrian Jew complaining to the Roman governor that his status as a citizen of Alexandria
had been unfairly downgraded.









of Alexandria (Kcdocap 'IoiUXLto Trot; v 'AXExav6peL( 'Iou6aoLot; TrotiocaX XaLXKv C r Xrlv

e i'6G)oev OL 'AXExav6pE'v TroXltaL eloLv).35 He did not, however, quote the inscription. The

omission of a quotation of such a crucial piece of evidence suggests that Josephus was being

quite liberal in his interpretation of the inscription. In that same list of documents Josephus has

the people of Sardis referring to the Jews as citizens.36 But Josephus seems to betray himself

when he says in another place that an Alexandrian stele recorded Jewish rights (rd

6LKaL0w[TxR),7 and of Alexander he says that to the Jews' E'6KEv Tb TETOLKEiV KaTr TriV TTroXLV S

'LOou 4olpac Trp6b roTo "EXXirvaX ("he granted for them to reside in the city in equal portion with

the Greeks")-an ambiguous phrase. Neither 6LKUcaG LtX nor k 'i'ou [oiLpac amounted to

Alexandrian citizenship. The best interpretation is that the Roman emperors confirmed the

Jewish status as a TrOVLi uia, but nothing more.38

Josephus also betrayed the real situation when he quoted Strabo as saying that in Cyrene

TETTrrpE 6' 'CaFv kv rT TrTO/XL uT5v Kuprivcaov TE rT rUTv TOXLTr5)V KCL Ti r0TV yE(py&)v rpLirl 6'

Ti To)V tEUOLKKOV TerTrdprr 6' i rTov 'Iou6aicv ("there were four groups in the city of the

Cyrenaicans: the citizens, the farmers, the resident aliens, and the Jews"). It should be

remembered that Cyrene was one of the places where the Jews' temple contributions had been

confiscated. It is clear from Strabo's words that the Jews did not fit into any native political

category in Cyrene, so they were not citizens of that city. Their vaguely-defined status may have


35 AJ 14.189. Similarly, in 12.8 he says Alexander the Great rote MaKE66 LV kv
'AXE av6peLU vrotiL ac [aoTroXilaTC ("made them equal citizens with the Macedonians in
Alexandria").
36 14.259: oL KWTOLKOVTEo iLv Ev Tr TrOdr6L Tr' a'pXfl 'IouGaioL Tro~^LTaL ("The Jews
who live in this city from the beginning are citizens").
37 Ap. 2.37.
38 CPJ 1.56. This was simply a political expedient on the part of the Romans. The
dissolution of the Ptolemaic government left the status of minority ethnic groups in question, and
Rome simply confirmed the status they had previously enjoyed.









even been the pretext for the locals' confiscation of their temple contribution.39 Further

confirmation of their non-citizen status appears in Augustus' response to the Jewish complaint in

Alexandria. He granted the Jews ivsotelei/a, which meant that they had a status between that of

metics and citizens and thus were not liable to the same taxes as metics. Similarly, Philo of

Alexandria never spoke of Jews as possessing full citizenship in the po,lij of Alexandria, and the

Jews were subjected to the laographia by Rome (beginning in 4 CE), indicating that Rome did

not count them as citizens of Alexandria either, and thus they were not considered true

Hellenes.40 On the whole, Applebaum concluded "We have not discovered in the course of our

investigation evidence that in any Greek city in the Hellenistic or early Roman period the Jews

possessed citizenship as a body."41 Yet Josephus often seems to give the impression that Jews

regularly enjoyed citizenship status. The picture that develops is that Josephus was playing fast

and loose with the terminology in such a way that implied the Jews were citizens. This is striking

in light of the fact that Josephus later criticized Apion for trying to pass as a native Alexandrian

when he was not.42 Furthermore, Josephus was playing with fire as he attempted to get the Jews

into Alexandrian citizenship. Egypt, to Roman ears, conjured up the image of Cleopatra. So










39 Applebaum, 'The Legal Status of the Jewish Communities', 444.
40 CPJ 1.59-64. For purposes of the poll tax, the Jews were not even considered
metropolitan, which would have recognized them as people of Greek education but not citizens
of the polis, and which would have given them a discount on the tax liability.
41 Applebaum, 'The Legal Status of the Jewish Communities', 449. He goes on to note
that there was no precise and comprehensive Roman legislation concerning Jewish rights empire-
wide. What existed was a series of imperial confirmations of Jewish privileges in local places
(pp.457-8).
42 Ap. 2.29.









Josephus was careful to press for recognition of Jews as citizens of the Greekpolis of

Alexandria, but at the same time kept a distance from Egyptians.43

Applebaum further notes "However small the prospects of success for the average Jew, the

claim to civic equality might become significant from a psychological, fiscal, and judicial point

of view."44 His notice of the psychological motive fits well with the approach of this dissertation,

that a perceived crisis in self-esteem motivated Josephus to portray the Jews in terms of the

Greeks. In the matter of political terminology it appears that he either thought the terms were

fluid enough to include Jews as citizens of major Greek cities, or he himself used the terms

imprecisely. Either way it is clear that Josephus was eager to posit citizenship of Diaspora Jews,

for this would certainly have made them look like insiders, equal to Greeks in many ways. The

question of the status of Jews in Alexandria was an old one in Josephus' day. However, his aim

was not simply to contribute an opinion about that particular problem. Instead he made the case

for Jewish equality on a much larger scale. The Jewish struggle for civic status also reveals

another dimension of the situation. Bilde noted that the most important feature of the Western

Jewish Diaspora was its struggle for equal civic rights and cultural recognition, "And this

struggle was, and had to be, fought against their Greek fellow citizens."45 Roman ascendancy,

however, meant that the struggle the Jews had engaged with their Greek neighbors was now

taken to a Roman audience for adjudication.

Beyond things such as adopting a Greek paradigm for the title and number of books for his

work, and using Greek terms where they did not precisely fit, Josephus also made connections



43 J. Barclay, 'The Politics of Contempt: Judaeans and Egyptians in Josephus' Against
Apion', in J. Barclay (ed.), Negotiating Diaspora: Jewish Strategies in the Roman Empire
(London 2004) 109-27.
44 Applebaum, 'The Legal Status of the Jewish Communities', 451.
45 Bilde, 'The Jews in the Diaspora of the Roman Empire', 106.









between ancient Greeks and Jewish history. Overall, Josephus cited 55 Greek authors in his

works, 21 of them in the Biblical section ofAntiquitates Judaicae in 36 citations.46 For example,

in Antiquitates Judaicae 7.67, as Josephus related the capture of Jerusalem from the Jebusites by

David, he paused to note that y&p 'Apptqoou Tof Trpoyovou 4itLv E6u0a4 EaKcXdTEO [ETr& Trac' 6

auTTIv CXaoL TLVEW OTL KcaL "OrLTIpo0 TaXIT' jvo[taoEv 'IEpoooCu[Fa TO y&p LEpou Kara T~iV

'Eppalov yAXGTrav Ojvo[aoce vr & 26u1a orTL doGdXELtaa ("For it was called Soluma at the time

of Abraham our forefather, but after these things some say that Homer also called it Jerusalem,

for the temple is called, according to the Hebrew language, Soluma, that is, 'stability'").47 The

reference is possibly to Odyssey 5.283, which mentions the Solymian hills. This connection is

probably incorrect,48 but Josephus was using a well-known method among the ancients (seen

especially in Herodotus) to connect ancient places with places known to contemporary readers.

The fact that Tacitus made the same possible identification of the Jews with the Solymi in

Jerusalem in his Histories (5.2) may mean that Josephus was drawing on a fairly well-known

idea (unless Tacitus got the idea from Josephus). It was the connection with Homer (or epic

poetry in general) that was significant for Josephus, and not whether the connection could

withstand all criticism. By making this connection Josephus hinted at two things: 1) the antiquity

of Jewish culture and its capital city (and antiquity was a well-respected quality among the

Romans), and 2) that the greatest poet of ancient Greece apparently knew of the Jews and graced

them with mention in his immortal composition. The connection was designed to give his




46 J. Bowley, 'Josephus' Use of Greek Sources for Biblical History', in J. Reeves and J.
Kampen (eds.), Pursuing the Text: Studies in Honor ofBen Zion Wacholder (JSOTSup 184,
Sheffield 1994) 202-4.
47 The part of the text that mentions Homer is disputed. Marcus' opinion (Loeb edition V
394) is that "these words are probably a gloss."
48 Jaeger 127-8.









narrative more credibility and to offer a broader perspective which took in non-Jews.49 Josephus

was arguably following the model of Herodotus, whose account was famous for its inclusion of

stories about foreigners. Even more, such stories "provided a convenient means whereby the

Jews could reinvent themselves in a Hellenistic context"50-that is, they provided a way to

construct a Greek ethnicity for Jews.

There was also a thread that connected the Jews with Sparta. In 2 Maccabees 5.9 is the

story that in 168 BCE the high priest of the Jews, Jason, fled to Sparta when he could find no

refuge in Egypt. The reason he chose Sparta was 6t& riv ouyyEveLcv ("on account of their

kinship"). Another story related how the high priest Jonathan sent letters to Rome and to Sparta

asking for renewal of friendship with those states. The letter to Sparta is recorded in 1

Maccabees 12.5-18, and a copy of the response from king Areus of Sparta follows (verses 19-

23). In those letters the Jews and Spartans mutually acknowledged each other as &6 4oi(.

Josephus related this latter story in a shortened form in Antiquitates Judaicae 12.225-7, and had

the Spartan king say to the Jews that EvTuXovre ypUaw ULVL EipO[iEV )) E kg E'bq LEEV yEvouU

'IouGUioL KciL AUKE6 Ld6vLOL KCL EK rij( Trp6o "Appacov OLKELOTrlTTO ("by coming across a

certain document we have found that Jews and Spartans are of one genos and are of kinship to

Abraham"), and then referred to the Jews saying &6fOoui0; 6ti&a 6vawC ("since you are

brethren"). After Jonathan died, the Spartans also sent an offer of alliance to his successor,

Simon (I Mac 14.20-3). Earlier, in Antiquitates Judaicae 1.240-1 Josephus quoted the historian

Alexander Polyhistor (first century BCE), who himself cited an author named Cleodemus

Malchus, that two of Abraham's sons accompanied Heracles in his Libyan expedition. The

daughter of one of these sons married Hercules and bore Diodorus, who fathered a son named


49 Bowley 207.
50 E. Gruen, 'Fact and Fiction', 78.









Sophon, from whom the Sophacians derived their name. Plutarch (Sert. 9.8-10) speaks of a son

of Heracles named Sophax, and relates that Sparta was founded by Heracles and that the city was

ruled by his descendants for several generations. Herodotus reported (7.208) that Leonidas was

descended from Heracles.51 So a connection between Abraham and Heracles made Jews and

Spartans brethren. Josephus never made the direct connection himself, but, as it was in the case

of his reference to Homer, it was unnecessary to do so. The suggestion was enough.

Sometimes Josephus was fortunate enough to find a reference in a Greek author that fit his

Jewish topic precisely. For example, in Antiquitates Judaicae 1.107-8 Josephus was dealing with

the long lifespans of people in the primeval age, specifically the age of Noah. The Biblical text

says that Noah died at the age of 950 years.52 This, of course, required some kind of defense, and

Josephus found it in the works of Greek historians. He said:

IcprTpoUoL 6E IOU T'O X6yc Tirc'VTE; oL Trap' "EXXTIOL KCL pcppcLpoL; ouyypaUi4EvoL T&C
cpXUaLoXoyLc Kcai y&p KcL McavEWov 6 triv A'yuTrruL'v TOLtrlociUevo0 ccvcypa~i v KUL
BilpGo6( 6 T0& Xa c6a'K& ouvUcyc6ylv KCL M ;6 TE KCIL 'EEoTLCLO( KUCL Trpboc To~oOOL 6
A'LyUTTrLO 'Iepwvu~o 0 oT T& (cOLVLKLK& ouyypa ci LJ4EVOL OUJOVOUOL TOL UTT' E OU
XEyoiEvoL. 'Holo66( TE KCL 'EKETCCLO( KCL 'EXX&VLKO( KCL 'AKOUCOL'XCo KCL Trpb TOU'TOL;
"E0opo0 KCL NLK6Oao oG LTopoUtL Toik UpXCaLoul C'oUvraVt 'eTir XLXLC Trep'i [V TOUTi)V 6(
Uv EKUoCTOL ri XLAOV OUTU) OKOTrELT)OoCLV

("All those from the Greeks and the barbarians who have composed Archaeologies testify
about my statement, for even Manetho who produced the Egyptian history, and Berosus,
who collected the Chaldean evidences, and Mochus, and Hestiaius, and with these the
Egyptian Hieronymus and those who composed the Phoenician records, agree with the
things said by me, and Hesiod, Hecataeus, Hellanicus, and Acusilaus, and with these
Ephorus and Nicolaus, record that the ancients lived a thousand years. But concerning
these things, let each one consider them as he pleases.").







51 In making these connections I have followed L. Feldman, 'Josephus' Moses and
Plutarch's Lycurgus', in J. Edmondson et al (eds.), Flavius Josephus andFlavian Rome (Oxford
2005) 212-3. See also Gruen, 'Cultural Fictions and Cultural Identity', 9-10.
52 Gen. 9.29.









What is most interesting is the comment at the end (cf also 2.348, 3.81, et al) which echoed

well-known statements in Greek historiographers53 and "became a commonplace in Hellenistic-

Roman historiography."54 This offer to allow the reader to judge for himself was an obvious

Greek touch in an account that was otherwise strongly apologetic. In this same vein, Josephus

sometimes mentioned Herodotus in order to disagree with him.55 By the first century fault-

finding with Herodotus had become a minor convention in historiography,56 and Josephus

participated in it like any other contemporary Greek author would.

Many Greek paradigms made impressions on the Antiquitates Judaicae, and sometimes

particular elements within the traditional materials with which Josephus worked lent themselves

quite easily to Greek presentations. For example, the creation story in the Biblical account

described a primordial world surrounded by water, which Josephus implicitly connected with the

mention of the four-headed river of Genesis 2.10 to become a river that encircles the whole

earth.57 This sounds just like the Greek Oceanos that surrounded the earth and was the source of

all life.58 That this was purely an attempt to make the Biblical account conform to Greek models

is made clearer by the fact that the rabbinic reading of the Biblical creation story posited no such


53 E.g., Hdt. 2.123; Th. 6.2.1; D.H. 1.48.
54 S. Cohen, Josephus in Galilee andRome, 39. The practice is recommended explicitly
in Lucian, Hist.Conscr. 60.
55AJ8.253ff, 10.19f.
56 Bowley 211-2. cf the famous passage in Thucydides, 1.20, and Plutarch's On the
Malice ofHerodotus. Josephus later says in Ap. 1.16 TrEptLpyo 6' &v E'rlV EyYo Toik ktoi ti&.Xov
ETrLoTcUC vou 6L55oK)v "ocM tiv 'EXXA.VLKO( 'AKOUOLXU. TrEpi 'TGV YEVE aXOYLt)V 6L5LTTrEd)VTJKEV
Oocc 65 6LopoTao L Trbv 'HoL'oov 'AKO)OLAuoXg r TiLVCa rpoTrov "E(opog piv 'EXX&VLKOV EV TOiL
irXELorotL; *Eu66devov ETTirL6KVUOLV "E(opov 6a TiatLOc KaL TL'(aLov oL 4 e' E'KEVOV
yeyovOTe; 'Hp66oTov 6 Tr vavrT ("I would be over-doing it if I were to teach them what they
know, what a great disagreement Hellanicus has with Acusilaus about genealogies, how
Acusilaus sets Hesiod straight, or in what way Ephorus demonstrates Hellanicus a liar in most of
his history, as Timaeus then does to Ephorus, and the succeeding writers do to Timaeus, and all
do to Herodotus").
57AJ 1.38.
58 Cf. I1. 18.607, 21.194; Hdt. 4.8; Arist. Metaph. A3.983b27.









thing.59 At other times Josephus expanded a Biblical narrative to incorporate Greek features that

were not originally there in his source materials. Thus although the canonical Biblical picture did

not describe the life of the first man, Adam, as blissful, Josephus used this language to enlarge on

the Biblical account and thus made the narrative conform to Greek ideal of the past Golden Age

as found in Hesiod and many other classical authors.60 In particular, Hesiod said that in the

Golden Age men were free from ills (KCKoL) and toil (Tr6vo(), in contrast to a life of misery in

which men grow old quickly (KaT ayrlpoKo).61 Josephus had God say that Adam's life was KUKOU

TcrvTOb d&Trrac~ ("free from every evil"), that Adam was able to live Xopit u[4eTepou Trovou

("without your own toil") which otherwise would have only brought on old age sooner (cWv

Tcap6vrowv yrpdX T8 rov).62 Alternately, sometimes Josephus inserted key terms that would

make a reader think of a Biblical story in terms of a similar Greek story. So in telling the story of

the flood Josephus said that Noah built an ark, a XApvc. The LXX used a different word

(KLPWT6(), but Josephus chose to use the word that was used by Apollodorus63 and Plutarch64 in

telling the Greek tradition of the flood and the story of Deucalion. Thus either by adding details,

by capitalizing on features of his material that had Greek parallels, or by changing the

vocabulary to suggest Greek parallels, Josephus told the ancestral Jewish stories in a particularly

Greek way.







59 Feldman, Studies in Josephus' Rewritten Bible 1.
60 Feldman, Studies in Josephus' Rewritten Bible, 3-4.
61 Op. 113-115, 90-93.
62 AJ 1.46. Note that Josephus has used the Attic spelling (0&8Tov) instead of the spelling
more common in the Koine, O&ooov.
63 Bibliotheca 1.7.2.
64 De soll. an., 13.









Exempla

The Hellenistic canons of Greek historiography also made impressions on Josephus'

account of Jewish history. By Josephus' day historiography was becoming more biographically-

oriented. It had long been a method within Greek historiography to present leading figures in

historical episodes as exempla of character traits, virtues, and conduct to be emulated.65 The

technique was already discernible in Aristotle, Isocrates (his Evagoras), and Thucydides.66 It

received further impetus in Xenophon's Hellenica and his biography of Agesilaus,67 and in the

hands of Polybius exempla became prime vehicles for his purposes of modeling political utility.68

Plutarch's Parallel Lives (which he himself called "histories") represented a culmination of this

process of transformation from history as a record of events, led along the way by great historical

figures, to history mostly as the biography of an exemplar. Interestingly, Plutarch's biographies

were apologetic in nature, designed to demonstrate that great Greeks were equal to great

Romans.69 Josephus' presentation of Jewish history in the Antiquitates Judaicae was similarly

driven by exempla, and their stories were crafted to make them similar to prominent Greek

characters. A few examples may suffice.

The founding father of the Jews was Abraham, and Josephus crafted his presentation of

this leading Jewish exemplar after the model of a Greek philosopher. Josephus says that

Abraham 6ELV6c (C3v ouvelvai T TrEpi Tru'VTr V KCL TirLOUV6( TOT( (KpoW4ivoL( ("was clever,







65 Momigliano, 'Tradition and the Classical Historian', 289.
66 Feldman, 'Josephus' Moses and Plutarch's Lycurgus', 209-11.
67 J. Bury, The Ancient Greek Historians (New York 1958), 153.
68 Fornara 107-113.
69 Grant 73.









knowing all things and able to persuade those who heard him").70 His ability to persuade, that is,

to use rhetoric effectively, cast him in good Greek fashion. Josephus also presented Abraham as

having higher conceptions of &peTi than others and as being the first proponent of monotheism,71

having arrived at this conclusion not by divine revelation (as the Biblical story might suggest),

but by use of his ability to reason.72 In fact, the Abraham of Josephus uses a form of the

teleological argument that is based on Platonic and Stoic models.73 "More simply, we may say

that Josephus has taken Cleanthes' third argument from the irregularity of sublunar phenomena

and extended it to the heavens themselves. Josephus was apparently the first to do so, and

Abraham is thus depicted as a philosophic innovator."74 The portrait also included statements

that Abraham won the respect of the Egyptians as being a man of the greatest intelligence

(ouvetrTTro;o), that he (again) possessed a superb ability to persuade, and was the one who taught

the Egyptians arithmetic and astronomy,7 and that when he went to Egypt at a time of famine in

Palestine it was not simply to get food, but also to converse with the Egyptians on philosophical

matters and to correct their thinking, unless theirs proved superior to his.76 He was superbly

intelligent and yet fair-minded, and most importantly, open to serious and substantial dialogue

with others. This strongly positive portrayal of Abraham no doubt was designed to counter the

popular image that Jews were closed-minded and intolerant of all that was not Jewish. Abraham





70 AJ 1.154. Feldman notes that d&Kpodo[at was used of students listening in the
philosophical schools. L. Feldman, 'Abraham the Greek Philosopher in Josephus', TPAPA 99
(1968) 145.
71 AJ1.155.
72 AJ 1.155-57.
73 Feldman, 'Abraham the Greek Philosopher', 146-7.
74 Feldman, 'Abraham the Greek Philosopher', 149.
75 AJ 1.167.
76 AJ 1.161.









was portrayed as a veritable Jewish Aristotle, a Hellenistic "renaissance man." With such a great

exemplar at the head of their family tree, how could one not respect the Jews?

In Greek thought, the nobility of a body of law was partly a function of the nobility of the

lawgiver.77 Thus it was necessary for Josephus to present a positive-and Greek-portrayal of

the great lawgiver of the Jews, Moses, who was apparently the most well-known Jewish

character among Gentiles.8 A positive, Greek portrayal of Moses would (in Josephus' opinion at

least) have contributed significantly to the building of a Jewish ethnicity along Greek lines. Hata

has argued that Josephus' treatment of Moses "reveals the intention of its author and the hidden

current running under its narrative only when it is read within the context of the anti-Semitism

that is attacked in Against Apion."79 One of the most obvious attempts to align Moses with

Greeks is when Josephus says that the so-called Song of Moses-the poem celebrating the

deliverance of the Israelites at the Red Sea and the simultaneous defeat of the Egyptians (Exodus

15)-was composed in hexameter verse,80 and that Moses later composed another work in

hexameter,81 which by its description apparently refers to a section of the canonical

Deuteronomy. There is no such regularly discernible thing as hexameter in Hebrew poetry, nor

does the LXX text of Exodus 15 render the Song of Moses as hexameter; this was a purely Greek

characterization on Josephus' part. It did, however, make Moses look like that famous ancient

Greek historian-poet, Homer.


77 Cf Y. Amir, 'Josephus on the Mosaic "Constitution"', in H. Reventlow et al (eds.),
Politics and Theopolitics in the Bible and Postbiblical Literature (JSOTSup 171, Sheffield 1994)
18.
78 There are at least 24 separate references to Moses or the exodus in pagan literature
contemporary with Josephus. G. Hata, 'The Story of Moses Interpreted within the Context of
Anti-Semitism', in L. Feldman and G. Hata (eds.), Josephus, Judaism, and Christianity (Detroit
1987) 180f.
79 Hata, 'The Story of Moses', 182.
o AJ2.346.
81 AJ4.303.









A more subtle approach is taken concerning the presentation of Moses' deeds. Feldman

has observed that the contours of Josephus' portrayal of Moses follow closely the contours of

Plutarch's portrayal of the Spartan lawgiver Lycurgus. For example, both are portrayed as

reluctant to take hold of the reins of power, as the objects of envy, as men who sought wisdom

from abroad, as military leaders, as survivors of rebellions led by relatives, and as men

characterized by moderation and piety.82 Similarly, the bodies of law that came from each are

described as having similar features. Both came from deity, both created councils of elders to

assist in governance, both discouraged the visual arts, both forbade consultation of soothsayers,

both demanded an offering of the first fruits of crops, both paid particular attention to details of

child-rearing, and both demanded that the laws not be changed.83 In other ways, Josephus

presented Moses as a Stoic philosopher. For example, Josephus borrowed a Stoic phrase, Tr6vov

KcUrapovCoEL ("despising exertion") to describe the greatness of Moses in Antiquitates Judaicae

2.229.84 The account also has dramatic touches with motifs and phrases from the Greek

tragedians.85

Whether or not Josephus knew Plutarch or his writings is debatable, so the question of

borrowing is hard to decide. Feldman argues that it is possible, if not likely, that the two men at

least knew of each other if they did not actually know each other.86 However, both authors were

acquainted with the elements of encomia commonly advocated in the rhetorical practices of the

day. Thus even if they did not have direct access to each other's work, they shared a common

paradigm for writing about great historical figures. Either way, Josephus' portrait of Moses



82 Feldman, 'Josephus' Moses and Plutarch's Lycurgus', 216-22.
83 Feldman, 'Josephus' Moses and Plutarch's Lycurgus', 222-30.
84 L. Feldman, 'Josephus' Portrait of Moses. Part Three', JQR 83 (1993) 321.
85 Feldman, 'Josephus' Portrait of Moses. Part Three', 322-5.
86 Feldman, 'Josephus' Portrait of Moses. Part Three', 231-7.









clearly shared many similarities with Plutarch's presentation of Lycurgus. In fact, "Moses is

modeled in Platonic fashion after the founder of a Greekpolis, whose laws form the constitution

(TroXLo~Lra) of the state."87 In this way, Moses was presented as reflecting Greek virtues almost

transparently. Such a thoroughly Greek picture of the Jewish lawgiver was designed not only to

present yet another great exemplar for which the Jewish people as a whole ought to be respected,

but also to impart a similar respect to the law which came through Moses. This was an important

part of the project for Josephus, given the low view many pagans had about things such as

Jewish Sabbath observance and dietary restrictions.

Certain foreigners in the Biblical stories, or stories of Jews in foreign contexts, were

especially important for Josephus because they presented opportunities to show favorable

relationships between Jews and non-Jews. Again, such incidents become arguments imbedded

within the narrative. If other foreigners could respect the Jews and their culture, and treat them

favorably, then so could the Romans. In fact, in light of stories of favorable relationships

between Jews and other nations, the Romans would appear out of step, as if every other nation

found admirable qualities in the Jews except the Romans. So Josephus had Jethro, a foreigner

(Midianite), adopt Moses as his son,88 something the canonical Biblical story did not posit. Most

importantly, Joseph rose to prominence in Egypt, and Daniel was a Jew who served the

Babylonian court in the Jewish diaspora in Babylon itself. Since such narrative situations were

important for presenting a positive picture of Jews in the diaspora in the Roman world, Josephus

gave considerable space in his work to these two figures. In fact, both of these figures would



87 Feldman, 'Josephus' Portrait of Moses. Part Three', 215-6. Cf A. Droge ('Josephus
Between Greeks and Barbarians', 126) commenting on the similar treatment of Moses in the Ap.:
"The presentation of Moses in this passage owes more to Plato's Laws than it does to the book of
Deuteronomy."
8 AJ 2.263.









have been an important characters for Josephus personally, since they, like Josephus, were

prophets living outside of their homeland who predicted favorable things of the pagans they

served and who were the object of jealousy on the part of rivals. In each of these cases Josephus

expanded the Biblical accounts to enhance the idea of a positive reception of Jews by non-Jews

which was only latent in the Biblical texts.89

Josephus paid special attention to the account of the Jewish patriarch Joseph. The

canonical Hebrew text of Genesis spent 585 lines to tell his story, but Josephus used 1172 lines.90

In Josephus' hands, Joseph was presented as having the best qualities of a Hellenistic hero.

Josephus emphasized Joseph's good looks, a quality that reminds us of great Greek characters

renowned for their handsome appearance such as Hector in the Iliaf1 or the statement in Plato's

Phaedrus that leaders ought to be handsome.92 In addition to good looks, Josephus also claimed

that Joseph possessed a keen mind, evoking the semblance of Roman characters such as

Romulus and Remus who are described in the same way.93 In fact Josephus went out of his way

to stress the wisdom of Joseph, using no less than five different words (ooLaX, oUveowL, 6ELOrnI,

(p6vr|oL; / Op6virLa, and XoyLov6() for wisdom or intelligence in the account.94 His wisdom was

manifested in several ways. For example, Joseph is presented as being skilled in the art of

persuasion in a way that is quite different from the presentation in the Biblical text. In the scene


89 It may be that Josephus also emphasized these stories out of self-defense. As prophets
in foreign courts, Joseph and Daniel serve as paradigms for Josephus himself. Although the
Greeks and Romans were well familiar with the idea of inspired poets, they were unfamiliar with
the idea of inspired historiographers. As I noted in chapter two, Josephus' status as a prophet
(respected in Jewish culture) would have been radically relativized under the social structure of
Roman culture. Perhaps these stories therefore also served as an apologetic for Josephus' self-
designated role in his Roman situation.
90 L. Feldman, 'Josephus' Portrait of Joseph', RB 99 (1992) 380-1.
91 22.370.
92 279.
93 Dion. Hal. 1.79.10.
94 As noted by Feldman, 'Josephus' Portrait of Joseph', 392.









where Potiphar's wife propositions Joseph, in the Biblical account the young man refuses on

moral grounds alone (Genesis 39:8-9). In Josephus' account, however, Joseph attempts to avert

the woman's advances with rational argument. In fact, in Josephus' telling of the story,

Potiphar's wife was just as attracted to Joseph because of his intellect as she was by his good

looks.95 In a similar way, although the Biblical text reports that the king of Egypt consulted his

magicians in the attempt to interpret his dreams, in Josephus' telling of the story the magicians

are not mentioned and the story becomes a contest between the wise men of Egypt and the wise

Joseph.96 Furthermore, in the Biblical text Joseph suggested that the pharaoh appoint someone to

manage the harvests in light of the coming famine, but in Josephus' version the pharaoh asked

Joseph to do this job without having it suggested to him first, which gave the impression that the

pharaoh was impressed with Joseph's wisdom already. Generally, foreigners in Josephus' telling

of the story (Potiphar, his wife, the king of Egypt, etc.) regularly noticed Joseph's intellect.

More importantly, Josephus drew significant attention to Joseph's wisdom in his ability to

interpret dreams, a skill widely revered in the ancient world, including among the Greeks.

Dreams were important for Josephus; he recorded 35 of them in his works.97 Like other ancient

peoples, the Greeks generally believed that dreams were communications from gods,98 and the

ability to interpret them was considered a special talent. In fact, it was generally acknowledged

that the interpretation of dreams was a talent that belonged only to people who were spiritual99

and who possessed a high degree of piety and goodness.100 Alternately, some in the ancient



95 AJ2.41.
96AJ2.75.
97 Feldman, 'Josephus' Portrait of Joseph', 396.
98 Cf. I. 1.62-3; Hes. Theog. 211-13; Crito 44.A2-B5.
99 P1. Smp. 203A.
100 P. Athanassiadi, 'Dreams, Theurgy, and Freelance Divination: The Testimony of
lamblichus', JRS 83 (1993) 116.









world (e.g., the Epicureans) believed that the interpretation of dreams was the proper domain of

philosophers.101 Either way, Joseph was in good company. That one of the founding figures of

the Jewish people had significant experiences with dreams (either receiving them or interpreting

them) that led him from one land to another immediately makes us think also of Aeneas and his

dream in Aeneid 3.147-71, where he is told to go to Italy.102 Of course, not everyone in ancient

times believed that dreams were auspicious. Thucydides ignored them, and among some people

in Roman times, dreams were considered only deceptive and insubstantial, things that concerned

only those who were simplistically superstitious.103 Yet in spite of skeptics, belief in the divine

nature or divine origin of dreams persisted in the ancient world. Even Aristotle believed that they

had some significance although he was able to deny intellectually that they were sent by gods.104

Josephus was not necessarily arguing philosophically about their significance one way or the

other. It seems that instead Josephus saw in this feature of the Joseph story an element that

resounded with the culture of his day, one that made the Jews look much like Greeks and

Romans. In fact, the time in which Josephus wrote was a time when dreams were being given

more and more credence in the culture at large. The abundance of documents about dreams and

their interpretation from the Greek East and Egypt led Clay to refer to the second century CE as

"an age of dreams,"105 and Harris remarks that "the epigraphical evidence suggests at least the

possibility that dream prophecies gained an extra degree of importance from Flavian times or

after 100 AD."106 The Joseph narrative lent itself quite easily to the sentiments of the day.



101 See D. Clay, 'An Epicurean Interpretation of Dreams', AJP 101 (1980) 342-65.
102 Cf A. Weston, 'Three Dreams of Aeneas', CJ32 (1937) 229-32.
103 E.g., Theophrastus (Char. 16.11) and Diogenes of Sinope (Diog. Laert. 6.43). See W.
Harris, 'Roman Opinions About the Truthfulness of Dreams', JRS 93 (2003) 18-34.
104 Arist., Div. Somn. 1.462b14-15, 463a5-6; 2.463b12-464b6.
105 Clay 343.
106 Harris 31.









In the story of Joseph we see another quality of the Hellenistic hero, viz. that he comes

from good stock. This too was part of the Greek convention of historiography Josephus chose to

emulate. The Hippias maior, ascribed to Plato, dictated that one of the things that ought to

receive due attention in an dpxcaLOXoyL, is the matter of genealogy.107 Glaucus and Diomedes

exchanged genealogies when they meet on the battlefield in the Iliad to establish their status as

great men.108 Tacitus related the ancestry of Agricola in his biography of that well-known

legate,109 and Herodotus traced the lineage of the Spartan king Leonidas.110 Dionysius of

Halicarnassus emphasized this quality in Romulus and Remus when he noted that oi 65

xav6pWOeivTe yLVOvraL KaME TE (L(G)OLV 4op4fl( KdL 4pov '[XTO[ O"yKov ou oo0(oppoLC KMCL

POUKOXOL EoLKOITE, cAxA ovLou Uv TL &LLoELE TOWOv E'K paoLAEL'ou TE iUVTLac yEvou KCML &76ro

6LaLtdvG)v oTrop&( yevioOaL vooiiXLotivou ("when they became men, they appeared both in

elegance of form and elevation of thought not as pig-herders or cattle-herders, but as those whom

one might consider as born of royal lineage and thought to be offspring of the gods").111 The

ancient novel likewise gave due attention up front to the genealogy of the main character.112 Yet

Josephus did not use genealogies in his stories to connect the Jews to the Greeks. Instead he used

them to connect great Jewish figures with the Greek value of having a good ancestry.

Josephus' presentation of the Jewish prophet Daniel makes the same basic impression as

the Joseph story. In general, Josephus tried to emphasize a core set of values about many of the

Biblical characters he treated. "When we examine the key figures in Josephus' paraphrase of the

Biblical narrative, we see that, in almost every case, in addition to the external qualities of good


107 285D.
108 6.123-231.
109 Ag. 4.
110 7.204.
111 1.79.10.
112 G. Schmeling, Xenophon ofEphesus (Boston 1980) 21.









birth and handsome stature, he places great stress on the four cardinal virtues of

character-wisdom, courage, temperance, and justice-and on the spiritual quality of piety."113

Josephus used the literary convention of the exemplar not only in imitation of Greek

historiographical style, but also to present Jewish characters as people who embodied Greek

ideals.

To say that Josephus portrayed Jews as having Greek characteristics, or that he used Greek

models in telling Jewish history, is not to say that Josephus necessarily did it well. The fact that

he was a newcomer to the Greek literary tradition showed itself from time to time. One of the

most obvious problems was that in the part of the Antiquitates Judaicae that dealt with Biblical

history (books 1-11), he sometimes mixed the genres of myth and historiography (as when he

compared Moses to Homer). The history of the Hebrews as contained in the canonical books of

the Hebrew Bible114 was written as history, as a detailed account presented as a continuum. In

this way the Jews had long been different from the Greeks, who had myths (in poetry) for their

ancient past and histories (in prose) for their recent past. When Josephus attempted to cast

Hebrew "historical" characters into forms that made them resemble Greek mythical characters,

he was blurring a well-known line in his day.115 The result does not look typically Greek in some

ways and thus paradoxically made the finished product look foreign in these aspects, not

Hellenic.

Stories of Positive Impressions on Non-Jews

Just as foreigners in the Biblical stories are often heard acknowledging Jewish piety,

Josephus also knew of another document that bolstered this image. Thus Josephus paid special

113 Feldman, 'Josephus' Portrait of Joseph', 390. Cf also L. Feldman, 'Josephus' Portrait
of Jacob', JQR 79 2/3 (1988-1989) 106.
114 The contents of his Bible are described in Ap. 1.38-40. The Hebrew canon was
considered closed in Josephus' day.
115 M. I. Finley, 'Myth, Memory, and History', History and Theory 4 (1965) 281-302.









attention to the story of the LXX itself. A particular document, the so-called Letter ofAristeas,

explained the origin of the translation and suited Josephus' purposes well. Just how important it

was for Josephus may be gauged from the amount of space he devoted to it in his work. Pelletier

claims that "After the Bible, it is the document that Josephus cites most extensively."116 From it

Josephus presented the LXX as a bonafide piece of Greek literature, produced at the request of

an pagan ruler (Ptolemy Philadephus) who is portrayed as interested in Jewish laws and customs

and whose invitation to produce the translation was a tacit invitation for the Jews to participate in

the Hellenistic cultural world.

The story was particularly well-suited to Josephus' aims, because the Letter placed the

production of the LXX within the context of the birth of the Hellenistic age and in a place that

was indisputably one of the greatest centers of Hellenistic learning, Alexandria. The picture was

that from the beginning of the Hellenistic age, the Jews had been recognized as having

something important to contribute and were invited inside. A Hellenistic scholar, with the

agreement of the king, thought that the books of the Jews ought to have a place in the great

library. Their inclusion there was a confession, as it were, that the LXX was worth reading by the

Greeks. This point was guaranteed by the fact that the LXX had been produced under the

patronage of no less than the king of Egypt in consultation with one who was arguably the

greatest scholar of the day, the keeper of the Royal Library of Alexandria, Demetrius of

Phalerum. This story, however, betrays evidence of editing that was sensitive to the tastes of a

Roman audience. The Letter ofAristeas had been transmitted among the Jews (obtaining a place

in the collection known as the Apocrypha), but it was written in the Koine Greek of the second

and third centuries BCE, and that style "did not reflect the literary tastes of the early Roman


116 A. Pelletier, 'Josephus, the Letter of Aristeas, and the Septuagint', in L. Feldman and
G. Hata (eds.), Josephus, The Bible, andHistory (Detroit 1989) 102.









Empire."117 So rather than quote from the document, Josephus paraphrased it. Similarly, details

of the story that would have bored Romans are omitted, and he has simply extracted the material

that made for the best narrative.118

Foreign rulers or other powerful figures who had favorable experiences with Jews were

also important for Josephus' purposes, and their stories were similarly enhanced to emphasize

their good will toward Jews. Balaam, the Mesopotamian prophet who was hired to curse the

Israelites but who instead blessed them, thus became an important figure for Josephus, and he

devoted a third more space to the account than the LXX did. The picture of Balaam in Josephus

is not that of the classical arch-enemy of Jews, as the rabbis depicted him. Josephus instead

softened the picture by adding such things as Balaam's offering a sacrifice before he

prophesied119 and the prophet's hospitality toward the envoys from the Moabite king Balak.120

Even more importantly, here Josephus had a story of a non-Jew blessing the Jews. However,

with the prophet's blessing in the Biblical text came the characterization that the people of Israel

"will dwell alone" (Numbers 23:9), which could potentially only serve to underscore perceptions

of Jewish aloofness from the rest of the world. So Josephus had the prophet predict instead that

the Jews would become the happiest of all people.121

In a similar vein, Josephus was able to capitalize on the fact that the Letter ofAristeas

portrays Ptolemy Philadelphus as having such a favorable disposition towards the Jews and such

high regard for their piety that he released all Jews from slavery within his domain, at

considerable expense (700 talents) to the royal treasury, and that the invitation to come to



117 Pelletier, 102-3.
118 Pelletier, 103-6.
119AJ4.113.
120 AJ4.105.
121AJ4. 114.









Alexandria and work on the translation was accompanied by beautiful furnishings for the

Jerusalem temple. What a contrast there was between the magnanimous and respectful treatment

of Ptolemy on the one hand, and the treatment Jews received from Romans on the other hand.

Ptolemy supplied a table for the temple, the Romans had taken a table out of the temple when

they sacked it. Ptolemy released Jewish slaves, the Romans made slaves of Jews. Ptolemy

invited the Jews to be part of Hellenistic culture and for the written expressions of their culture to

have a place on of the most important institutions of the day, the library of Alexandria. The

Romans, however, generally kept the Jews at arm's length. Surely these contrasts were not

totally lost on Roman readers of the Antiquitates Judaicae, and were designed to make them

rethink their stance toward the Jews.

One of the most important stories for Josephus' purpose of aligning Jews with Greeks was

his account of the meeting between Alexander the Great and the Jews in Jerusalem.122 As it

stands the story appears to be a compilation of three original stories,123 which Josephus himself

combined.124 The tale is surely apocryphal, dating perhaps from the Maccabean period.125

Neither Arrian nor Plutarch nor any other credible Greek source mentions a visit to inland

Palestine by Alexander, neither on his way to nor from Egypt. The only other literature in which

the story is mentioned is late and Jewish in origin. Greek history knew nothing about a meeting

of Alexander with Jerusalem Jews. Nevertheless, the value of this story for Josephus' purposes

of ethnicity was immense. The Jewish reception of Alexander at Jerusalem is related as a typical


122 AJ 11.302-47.
123 A. Btichler, 'La relation de Josephe concernant Alexandre le Grand', Revue des etudes
juives 36 (1898) 1-26.
124 S. Cohen, 'Alexander the Great and Jaddus the High Priest According to Josephus',
AJSReview 7 (1982) 43; see also R. Marcus' appendix C in vol. 6 of the Loeb edition of
Josephus.
125 A. Momigliano, 'Flavius Josephus and Alexander's Visit to Jerusalem', Athanaeum 57
(1979) 442-8.









Greek adventus story, in which a monarch is given a grand welcome by the inhabitants of a

city.126 Alexander was dutifully and clearly acknowledged for the great leader he was. The story

goes on to relate that after his adventus Alexander honored the Jewish God with a sacrifice and,

most importantly, the Jews freely capitulated to Alexander's authority, and Alexander confirmed

their right to practice their ancestral customs. Jewish acceptance of Greek culture is thus

underscored, as is Greek approval of exclusivistic Jewish monotheism, an approval from the

hand of one no less than the founder of the Hellenistic world himself. Furthermore, the story also

shares in the qualities of a epiphany tale where a god appears to an important figure in a dream,

the result of which is the salvation of a city from destruction.127 Here both Alexander and the

Jewish high priest Jaddus received dreams, thus doubly insuring the city's safety. The potential

aggressor Alexander was prevented from attacking the city, and the guardian priest Jaddus was

encouraged about the city's safety. Most importantly, the story also served as a foundation for

Josephus' multiple assertions that the Jews enjoyed Greek civic rights from Alexander himself.

Management of Negative Impressions

It is one thing to present an ethnic group as positively as possible using the conventions of

the dominant social structure to argue for a basic compatibility between that structure and the

ethnic group. It is another thing to deal with negative perceptions satisfactorily. It is to this latter

problem, as it presented itself to Josephus in telling the material of Jewish history, that I now

turn. Because of the milieu in which he lived and wrote, it was impossible for Josephus to ignore

the many criticisms that had been leveled against Jews and Judaism. The risk, however, was

always that bringing these matters up only tended to magnify them and keep them in the

forefront unless they could be given a truly satisfying treatment.


126 S. Cohen, 'Alexander the Great and Jaddus the High Priest', 45-9.
127 S. Cohen, 'Alexander the Great and Jaddus the High Priest', 49-53.









One tactic available to Josephus was simply to avoid making things worse for himself and

omit elements of stories that proved to be problematic. For example, the Biblical story of the

flood has God punishing the world because God "repented" of having made man. This has long

proved to be a thorny text and Josephus apparently anticipated that it would have raised

considerable problems for his readers. It was not as if there was a lack of attempts to make sense

of the Biblical statement; several were at hand to Josephus in the rabbinic traditions. The

problem was that a pagan audience that was generally unsympathetic toward Judaism in the first

place was not in a position to appreciate any of them. So Josephus' solution was to omit the

statement from the history altogether.128 Here we see Josephus at work, picking and choosing

which elements of his material can or cannot, in his judgment, manage the impression he hoped

to create. This was not, however, a standard nor preferred practice for Josephus. It was risky,

because anyone who wished to check the LXX could have seen that Josephus had conveniently

left out details that were potentially embarrassing or philosophically problematic. Josephus'

preferred approach instead was to recast the stories in such a way that they were more intelligible

for a Hellenistic audience,129 or to add materials to make them more palatable. "If we examine

other passages which Josephus totally omits, we see that the overwhelming majority of them fall

into two categories: either the omission is to protect the reputation of a character, ... or the

passages in question are such as would impugn the Jews' reputation for tolerance .. and offered

ammunition to Jew-baiters in his non-Jewish audience."130 Either way, omission seems to have

been the solution of last resort. However, the Hebrew primeval history seems to have been one of

the most problematic parts of Scripture for Josephus, no doubt because many parts of it sounded



128 Feldman, Studies in Josephus' Rewritten Bible, 21-2.
129 Feldman, Studies in Josephus' Rewritten Bible, 61.
130 Feldman, Studies in Josephus' Rewritten Bible, 62.









strange to Greeks. N. Cohen has noted that Josephus made more changes to the Biblical stories in

this part of the history than in the rest of it.

"In AJ I-V the material has been entirely recast with the object of bringing the Biblical
narratives into conformity with the style and psychology of the Greek novel. The
genealogies have been paraphrased in the Greek style, the narratives embellished with long
speeches in the traditional manner of the contemporary historiographer, and much
additional matter culled from non-Biblical sources has been added, ...."131

Sometimes Josephus encountered the opposite problem in the Biblical materials: not

enough information to suggest alignment between Jews and Greeks. Instead of a negative

impression, such material simply constituted a non-impression. When this happened, Josephus,

with his fluid understanding of the nature of traditional stories, embellished and added details to

make a story sound more Greek. For example, one of the most impressive displays of dedication

to God in the Hebrew Bible is the aqedah, Abraham's "offering" of Isaac at the command of

God (Genesis 22). The Biblical narrative was sparse on details in a way that was not typical of

Greek stories. So Josephus "hellenized the Biblical narrative so that it acquires precisely those

qualities that are missing in the Bible-clarity, uniform illumination, and lack of suspense."132 In

the process he also downplayed the theological element of the story and used terminology that

echoed Homer's description of Priam. For example, Isaac is described in Antiquitates Judaicae

1.222 as EirT yYp ow oi566c KarT &6opE&v a~6c To OO eo yevo'[evov ("who was as a gift to him

[Abraham] from God on the threshold of his old age"), and Homer described Priam, who was

about to lose his son Hector, as uTrL yfpcao oiu6 (II. 22.60).133 Similarly, Josephus' presentation

of Isaac has affinities with Euripides' presentation of Iphigenia; both are portrayed as being the

delight of their parent, but also willing to be offered and rejecting any notion of acting against


131 N. Cohen, 'Josephus and Scripture: Is Josephus' Treatment of the Scriptural Narrative
Similar Throughout the "Antiquities" I-XI?', JQR 54 (1964) 319.
132 L. Feldman, 'Josephus as a Biblical Interpreter: The "Aqedah"', JQR 75 (1985) 213.
133 Feldman, 'Josephus as a Biblical Interpreter: The "Aqedah"', 213, 215.









the will of a god.134 Yet the story of the aqedah had its own problem: it could read to a pagan

like a story of child sacrifice, something that was taboo in Hellenistic times.135 So in Josephus'

account we hear the explanation: ou y&p rutUioUI aiLaTroc d&vOpTrrivou Trlv oGcay ~v cabU

Trpoor c a cTO TrratL6 'E'Xeev ("for it was not that he [God] was desiring human blood that he

ordered the slaying of the child by him")136-an addition to the Biblical account.

The Jewish right to the land of Palestine was a touchy issue for Josephus. I noted in a

previous chapter that land is a prominent ethnic criterion by most accounts, but that ethnic

element was bearing less and less weight for Jews in the first century CE, mostly due to the fact

that many of them lived outside the traditional homeland, client kingdoms of Rome in the east

were being replaced by direct Roman oversight, and in 70 CE their center of worship in the

ancestral homeland was destroyed. In light of these factors (especially the last one), it would

have been difficult for Josephus to maintain some kind of Jewish theological claim to the

traditional homeland with any kind of credibility. In post-70 CE, Jerusalem was a symbol of

Jewish defeat and Roman supremacy, and a theology of possession of Palestine by divine right

would have sounded ludicrous. This created a problem for Josephus as he told the Biblical story

to outsiders, because the canonical Biblical texts have as a prominent theme the giving of the

land of Palestine to Israel by covenant promise from God. So rather than have Abraham leave

Chaldea for Palestine at the command of God, Josephus has him leave because of the religious

intolerance of the Mesopotamians, and Abraham's descendants will get the land as fulfillment of

a prophecy but not as the guarantee of a covenant with God.137 There are many places in the

canonical narrative where the land and the covenant with God are explicitly connected, but

134 Feldman, 'Josephus as a Biblical Interpreter: The "Aqedah"', 219, 221, 233.
135 Cf Plutarch, Pelopidas 21.4.
136 AJ 1.233.
137AJ 1.185.









Josephus regularly ignored or minimized them. The land theology of the Jews has thus been

suppressed at the least, and denied at the most.

There were probably many reasons that presented themselves to Josephus for suppressing

the land aspect of the canonical narrative. As I have noted, the land theology in the canonical

texts simply would not have been believable in light of the historical facts, especially those of

66-70 CE. Also, Josephus was probably distancing himself from the kind of Jewish nationalism

(such as that of the Zealots) that made possession of the land of Palestine one of the key

contentions between Jerusalem and Rome. "He deleted the theology of covenanted land because

he did not want the land to be a focal point, as it was for Davidic messianism, with all its

revolutionary implications in Josephus' day."138 In fact, Josephus has instead read, and

presented, the Biblical story to expound a rationale for the Jewish Diaspora of his own day. He

has the pagan prophet Balaam (an outsider, from the story in Numbers 22-23) predict that the

piety of the Jews would result in their filling the earth and sea. "It is not a portrait true to the

classical Biblical end of days; rather it is a reflection of the Hellenistic world."139

Scenes in the Hebrew Bible where Jews suffered under the treatment of foreign monarchs

would also prove a difficult subject for Josephus if he wanted to smooth out Jewish-Roman

relationships in his day. It would not serve his purpose to repeat stories about mean-spirited

foreigners, for such stories could easily be seen as representing analogues to the Romans.

Furthermore, stories of Jewish mistreatment by foreigners would only serve to demolish the

portrait of a long history of good relationships with foreigners that he presented elsewhere. It was

in the interest of Josephus' plan, therefore, to remove the harsh edges of characters who, in the

Biblical texts, came across as villains. So the Pharaoh of Joseph's time is portrayed much more


138 Amaru 229.
139 Amaru 228.









positively in Josephus than he is in the Biblical text, and he repeatedly heaps praise upon Joseph

(in contrast to the more reserved picture in the Biblical text).140 Similarly, the Pharaoh of the

exodus, in scenes foreign to the Bible, tenderly holds the baby Moses in his arms141 and later

entrusts Moses to lead an Egyptian expedition against Ethiopia.142 The idea to kill Hebrew babies

as a means of population control and prevention of uprising came from Pharaoh in the Bible, but

in the account of Josephus it comes from one of Pharaoh's scribes. In this way the Pharaoh's

characterization was softened in a way similar to that of the treatment of Titus in the Bellum

Judaicum. The ruler was not depicted as callously harsh toward Jews, and the hardships that

came on the Jews in his time were seen as the work of underlings who lacked the king's

appreciation for the Jews and their piety.

Other difficult parts of Biblical stories lent themselves more readily to reception by ears

accustomed to hearing the Greek tales, and only needed the appropriate key words inserted into

them to make the connections more apparent. For example, the Biblical flood story raises the

question of why God would create man and then turn around and destroy him. For this question

there was an answer more amenable to the philhellenic spirit: it was the i pp[L of man that

precipitated the flood.143 With this word, which is not used in the LXX version of the story,

Josephus subtly tapped into the Greek tragic tradition and provided a solution that a Hellenic

audience would have found perfectly satisfactory. In fact, Josephus laid the groundwork for this

explanation previously in Antiquitates Judaicae 1.66, where he accused Cain and his descendants

of U1ppl(3v. He provided a similar explanation for God's confusing the languages at the Tower of

Babel. There man's prosperity led to i[ppL, and iUppiL led to punishment. This follows a fairly

140 Feldman, Studies in Josephus' Rewritten Bible, 83-4.
141 AJ2.232f.
142 AJ2.238-53.
143 AJ 1.100, using the verb Euppi().









typical pattern in Greek tragedy.144 Coloring the story in this way helped Josephus' readers

overcome a potential problem with the story and thus enabled Josephus to manage negative

impressions that could have arisen from the traditional materials.

Another kind of difficulty presented itself with the story of Solomon, who is portrayed in

the Bible as being corrupted by his attraction to foreign gods. In the Biblical story, the ruin of

Solomon's kingdom is directly tied to his participation in and support of foreign religious cults

among his foreign wives. This was problematic for Josephus, for it reinforced the negative

stereotype of the religiously intolerant Jew who looked upon non-Jews as defiled. Jewish refusal

to participate in Greco-Roman religion was one of the most persistent pagan criticisms leveled

against Jews in Josephus' day. Josephus therefore softened the Biblical picture in several ways.

Human speakers replace God, so the rebuke against Solomon does not come directly from the

deity. Josephus' telling of the Solomon story also has a more erotic emphasis, as well as an

emphasis on Solomon's advanced age, which serves to excuse his offense to some degree.

Furthermore, in the Josephus version, Solomon does not build high places for worship of foreign

gods. His offense instead is that he used a few features of foreign iconography in his own

projects.

The interesting thing here is that Josephus could have chosen to follow the account in

Chronicles, which does not mention Solomon's offenses. Instead he chose to use, with

modifications, the more embarrassing version from Kings. Why? Begg has suggested that the

story held two attractions for Josephus. First, it highlighted his theme of the moral excellence of

God, and how God rewards the good and punishes the evil (AJ 1.14). Second, the story has tragic

features (a character whose good life is ruined by hubris) which Greek readers would have found



144 Feldman, Studies in Josephus' Rewritten Bible, 28.









congenial.145 This corresponds with what I will demonstrate next about other stories in the

Antiquitates Judaicum: Josephus manages potentially negative stories as exempla of high moral

virtues.

It is in the latter part of the Antiquitates Judaicae that some of the most difficult problems

for the construction of an ethnicity appeared. Many Greek or Roman readers would have been

largely ignorant of ancient Jewish history, but would have been more familiar with the negative

stories associated with the Jews within recent memory. Books 14-20 of the Antiquitates Judaicae

center around the client kingdom of Herod the Great in Palestine, and its legacy. It is clear that

Josephus was not an admirer of Herod the Great. Among the things Josephus said about him are

that he had no rightful claim to rule the Jews, he came to prominence by killing his rival

Aristobulus, he was gripped by an insane jealousy and paranoia that drove him to acts of

immense cruelty, he was a hypocrite inasmuch as he criticized the Arabs for the very things he

himself did, it was his idea to kill his son Hyrcanus, and he killed his own wife because he

suspected that she had turned against him and had encouraged his children to do the same. The

latter act caused Herod considerable personal anguish, because he loved Mariamne greatly. In

fact, in Josephus' portrait Herod loved all women yet was quick to condemn rival kings on

rumors of their adultery. Herod also corrupted the kingdom's piety, he looted the tomb of the

revered king David, and he executed his sons on the belief that they had plotted to overthrow

him. He was a tyrant at home, but in the presence of the Roman emperor he gave every

impression of being fair, just, and loyal to Roman interests. He was power-hungry and

manipulated everyone and everything around him in order to enhance or maintain the power he




145 C. Begg, 'Solomon's Apostasy (1 Kgs. 11,1-13) according to Josephus', JSJ28 (1997)
312-13.









had accumulated. Herod's wife, Mariamne, fares little better. Although she eventually lost her

life at her husband's command, she had plenty of vices of her own.

How could such an embarrassing portrait of his homeland's most famous king and his wife

serve any good purpose for building a positive view of Jews in the Roman world? A partial

answer is suggested in 16.395-8, where Josephus briefly entertained the idea that it might be that

the forces of uuIrl and a&v&yKTr, which is also called dE'apiEvrl, were at work. As in the Bellum

Judaicum, Josephus allowed this Greek explanation a place in his history even though he had

clearly stated in the preface of his work that the history he relates is controlled by the fact that

God rewards the righteous and punishes the wicked.146 Josephus had a perfectly good and

consistent explanation for why the house of Herod was plagued by such internal turmoil. In fact,

he charged Herod with impiety in 16.188 (he looted the tomb of David), so the suggestion of the

role of urX is again all the more surprising, since we would expect Josephus' theology of

retribution from a just God to explain the matter instead. The use of the UXTl here is another sign

that Josephus was crafting his narrative in such a way as to reflect a sharing in perspectives and

experiences that were typically Greek.

Another part of the answer surely lies in Josephus' theology of divine retribution. The

story of Herod's horrible end displays the justice of God. Yet another aspect of the answer may

lie in Josephus' description of the famous Egyptian queen Cleopatra in 13.328-43 and 15.77-258.

She was, Josephus says, a scheming, murderous woman allied with a man (Antony) whose

loyalties to his own homeland were compromised in the pursuit of personal power, who meddled

in the affairs of other governments in the attempts to expand her own power, and who had driven

her own son from Egypt. Josephus was buying into the standard Roman view of Cleopatra here.


146 AJ 1.14.









In addition, Josephus had good reasons for animosity against Cleopatra as a Jew, for the

Egyptian monarch had no respect for Jewish political concerns and traded Jewish interests like

pawns in her political game (by intervening in the intrigues within the family of Herod she hoped

to give control of Idumea to Antony; 15:62ff). The Jews and the Romans therefore had a

common enemy in Cleopatra. Both could rightly complain about how she had acted against their

sovereignty. In some ways, Herod and Mariamne were analogues to Antony and Cleopatra.147

Both Romans and Jews had endured rulers who were self-serving tyrants. In this way Josephus

demonstrated a solidarity between Jews and Romans in that both had similar experiences with

unscrupulous Hellenistic client kings.

As I have shown in chapter three, Josephus gave considerable attention in the latter part of

his Antiquitates Judaicae to stories of how Jews were mistreated by those in Greco-Roman

culture at large, and in particular how Jewish funds meant for the temple were often confiscated

by Roman officials or with their knowledge. These stories played a significant apologetic role in

the Antiquitates Judaicae in at least two ways. First, the significance of these stories in terms of

ethnicity is that they portray precisely the kind of institutional philanthropic expression that

manifests the sense of solidarity which Smith posited as a fundamental element in ethnic self-

definition. Monetary contributions to the temple in the ancestral homeland were a public

expression of Jewish solidarity. The fact that Josephus related several instances of the violation

of these funds suggests that he found in this problem a particularly menacing threat to a practice

that, in his view, lay at the heart of Jewish self-understanding. His repeated attention to this

particular problem is a strong indicator that he saw this as a violation of the Jewish way of life

itself. For Josephus, an important element of Jewish ethnicity was at stake. Second, if the Roman



147 Interestingly, one of Herod's nine wives was named Cleopatra (AJ 17.21).









people prided themselves at all on being pious and religious, then stories of their interference in

Jewish religious matters should cause them to reconsider their attitudes and actions. As I have

shown in chapter five, Josephus supported the idea that the Romans were religiously sensitive.

His portrayal of Titus' reluctance to destroy the Jerusalem temple emphasized this quality. This

was not a matter of cowering to the imperial ego, as it has often been interpreted in the history of

Josephan studies. Instead Josephus was affirming Roman religious sensibilities in order to build

a case that the Jews ought to be respected for the greatness of this same quality among

themselves. This depended, of course, on also demonstrating that Judaism enshrined

considerably noble ideals itself, which is the very thing the Antiquitates Judaicae is designed to

do. Yet as always, this presentation was crafted in such a way to show that the Jewish religion

participated in the good qualities that were also recognized and admired in Greek culture. With

such a portrait, Josephus could hope to lift the stigma that Judaism was a foreign, "eastern" (i.e.,

suspicious) religion.

The stories which Josephus told about Jewish mistreatment are those that were likely

circulated as proof of the foreign and rebellious nature of Jews. Therefore Josephus chose to

address the very stories that were used to fuel anti-Jewish sentiments, in order to demonstrate

that they had been misinterpreted. He was attacking the problem of anti-Jewishness head-on. The

tactic here was the same as in the Bellum Judaicum, where Josephus said that he wrote his

account to set the record straight against other accounts that denigrated both him and the Jewish

people. In doing so Josephus was careful in how he told the stories, and in choosing which

elements of the stories got emphasis.

The story about Pilate's placement of images of Tiberius, on military signa, in Jerusalem

was one of the stories Josephus told to illustrate how Jews had been treated unfairly. There are,









however, a few things amiss with this story. First, it would have been cooler in Jerusalem (in the

mountains of Judea, elevation approximately 2,550 feet above sea level) in the winter than in

Caesarea, which sits on the coast. That Pilate would have moved himself and a Roman cohort to

a colder place for the winter does not make sense by itself. Much more likely is that Pilate

anticipated problems in Jerusalem, or that he simply wanted to assert his presence in the capital

city as the new procurator and the local embodiment of Roman power. It could well have been an

introductory display of power designed to remind the locals just who was in control. Alternately,

it could have been a routine, or even friendly visit to the city. In the Acts of the Apostles, Luke

relates that Porcius Festus, upon taking office in Judea, visited Jerusalem to meet the local

leaders.148 Either way, it seems more plausible that Pilate's visit to Jerusalem had to do with

asserting Roman authority and keeping the peace more than it did with the suitability of

Jerusalem as winter quarters for troops. Second, since Pilate would have been personally

accountable to Rome for anything he did that stirred up unrest among the client peoples, it is

hard to believe that he went to Jerusalem specifically with the intention of undoing Jewish

customs, as Josephus claims he did. It is unthinkable that Pilate could not have known about the

sensitivity of Palestinian Jews concerning Jerusalem itself. Third, this was a risky story for

Josephus to tell, because it portrayed the Palestinian Jews as religiously and culturally intolerant,

which is one of the perceptions that stigmatized them in the Hellenistic world in the first place. It

was normal Roman practice for Roman troops to set up their standards wherever they camped.

Like raising one's flag at an embassy or in an occupied town, it was indeed a political statement

(that, in its day, also included religious overtones). The act itself was not necessarily


148 Acts 25.1.









inflammatory, and may have been nothing more than a display of the procurator's loyalty to

emperor, yet the Jerusalem Jews took great offense at it.

Josephus crafted the presentation of this story carefully for his own apologetic purposes.

The episode has been narrated in such a way so as to maximize both the sense of unfairness

within it and the high piety of the Jews. Josephus saw in this incident a prime example of how

Jews were treated unfairly, how their religious beliefs were discounted by Romans, and how

their protests against such treatment were summarily dismissed or, worse, interpreted as their

causing trouble. The Jewish opposition to the Roman ensigns was presented as an objection

arising from the greatest kind of piety and religious dedication. Josephus wanted his readers to

think that it was only because the Jews were such good, religious people that this was a problem

for them. His agenda is clear, and the difficulties in his story are completely overshadowed by

the characterization of the incident as a willful affront against a pious people. In the end,

Josephus thought it was worth the risk to tell this story because it highlighted Jewish piety and

innocence. This was important in the face of accusations that the Jews were &oepet L and &OEoL.

Similar considerations apply to the story of Pilate's confiscation of temple funds to build

an aqueduct. Stern notes that if there was more money in the temple treasury than was actually

needed for temple expenditures, the surplus was used for other things including the municipal

needs of Jerusalem.149 Pilate may not have thought he was out of line and that such use of the

funds were at his discretion. While the fact that he again used armed troops to end the discussion

does not encourage optimism concerning his motives, his actions need not be interpreted as

wholly malicious either. As Josephus told the story, however, only one conclusion seemed

proper.



149 Stem, Greek and Latin Authors 198.









The event related in Antiquitates Judaicae 16, where Jews of Asia and Cyrenaica

complained to Herod and Agrippa in Asia, is also problematic. There was, again, a risk involved

in presenting things in this way. Josephus' repeated appeals to official documents and decrees

that gave the Jews exemptions ran the risk of emphasizing Jewish non-conformity and special

treatment. Decree after decree testified to the existence of a privilege that made the Jews look

foreign and unlike their neighbors, but the risk was offset first by the apologetic value these

stories held, and second by the fact that the decrees Josephus listed were tangible "proof"

(depending on one's perspective, of course) of Rome's kind disposition toward Jews. As

Josephus saw it, the decrees constituted official Roman recognition of the great piety of the

Jewish people everywhere. Even when their practice of sending money to Jerusalem cut across

Roman law, the highest officials in Roman government had consistently ruled that this

expression of Jewish piety was extraordinary and was not to be violated. This in turn became a

compliment to the Romans themselves for having recognized and upheld such piety among a

client people, and a reproach upon those who had tried to violate it. Allowing the Jews to collect

and send money to Jerusalem demonstrated the Roman recognition of the God of the Jews as a

legitimate deity whose worship and favor needed to be maintained. Seen in this way, the Jewish

collection for Jerusalem was not so much a case of special pleading and privilege (i.e., otherness,

non-Roman), but an act of religious piety respected by the emperor himself, thoroughly in

keeping with Augustan ideals of religious piety, and thus thoroughly Roman.

After listing the various decrees that allowed the Jews to maintain their practice, Josephus

says TrLoo at 65 TTOXXUKLK CLUTW;V TrV [v [rlTv EiTrL6LXXLTThU)V TC& yEvir K Tc T E'47rE()l)KUL'X( TOiL

&XoyorToL t~<6^V TE KdaKELVOV 4LiaOU) aLTLiac uTrE cLpou[evoc ("I make frequent mention of them

[the decrees] to bring the nations to reconciliation and to remove the causes of hatred that have









clung to those who are unreasonable among us and them").150 The problem, he says, was social

and cultural dissonance, not immorality. Josephus pleaded that the Jews were good people, and

this goodness made them just like other respected peoples, especially the Greeks. 66L KCL ratra

Trap' EKELwvov T'ltV cTrLTTITOV KUCL 6Eov OUK ev T) 65cLopcL TGV ETrLr 16Eu wI ) V oLteaOUL T6

XX 6TpLov AXX' kv T~ Trp6( KcUoKayaOLev ETrLT16E5Lwi 'EXELv ("therefore these things are more

expected from them concerning us, and it is necessary for them not to suppose hostility in the

difference of practices, but that there is a careful disposition to goodness").151 This is an

important statement, because it reveals that Josephus knew the attitude of the inhabitants of the

provinces toward Jews, and their perception of them. He appealed to the Hellenistic society at

large for a more beneficent interpretation, not only of the former Jewish collection for Jerusalem,

but of all Jewish customs. The fact that the Jews had large sums of money which they had not

invested in the local cities where they lived no doubt made them appear to be unconcerned,

aloof, and willfully disengaged from civic life and their neighbors. Josephus tried hard to explain

that this was not a proper interpretation and that the collection of this money ought to be seen as

one way Jews had of honoring their God. It was an act of piety, he suggests, not of ill-will

against the cities in which they lived.

Rajak has noted that Josephus had to engage in a kind of slight-of-hand to make this

argument work. The decrees which Josephus cited are haphazardly listed, and none of them

would have constituted an official Roman legal charter for Jewish privileges. They were instead

responses to particular incidents, over particular problems, in various places and would not have

been meant, nor interpreted at Rome, as empire-wide precedents.152 Yet that was exactly the



150 AJ 16.175.
151AJ 16.178.
152 Rajak, The Jewish Dialogue i ith Greece and Rome 304-18.









impression Josephus left from his handling of them. Their precise legal content has been

summarized-that is, generalized-in order to milk them for political capital.

In Antiquitates Judaicae 16.178 Josephus admitted that there was at least one scandal

involving a collection of funds for Jerusalem. An unnamed Jew who was in trouble with the law

in Palestine came to Rome and presented himself as a teacher of Jewish wisdom. He managed,

with three partners, to convince an affluent Roman woman, Fulvia, who was a proselyte, that she

had to send purple and gold to the temple in Jerusalem, which he and his friends would be glad

to deliver for her. She gave them the contribution, and they put it in their own pockets. The

woman feared she had been duped, told her husband what had happened, and he reported the

matter to the emperor. The result was that Tiberius ordered all the Jews to leave Rome.153 The

date was 19 CE.

In an account designed to portray the Jews in the best possible light to outsiders, this story

stands out as a shining example of avarice and greed. Why did Josephus tell this story? Why tell

a story that seemed to communicate the very impression of Jews that Josephus was trying to

correct? Why not just skip this story, as he did with other things? There are at least three

answers. First, as I noted in chapter two, Romans acknowledged both good and bad among

Greeks, and the Greeks themselves were sometimes critical of various sub-groups within their

own ethnicity.154 Josephus was thus not doing anything unusual here. Second, it would have been

unwise and unrealistic if Josephus had ignored well-known examples of Jewish shortcomings.

He had to avoid presenting the Jews as the perfect people, because no one would have believed

it. As I also noted in chapter two, the construction of an ethnicity must adhere to some semblance



153 AJ 18.81-4.
154 cf a Rhodian's criticism of other Greeks in Livy, 45.23.14-16, and Cicero
distinguishes between good ones and bad ones in Ver. 2.2.7.









of credibility if it is to succeed. Third, Josephus depicts the majority of Jews as victims here,

suffering for the actions of a few who were unscrupulous and greedy. This is exactly how he

depicted the Jews of Jerusalem in his account of the First Jewish War, where he said that the war

was caused by a minority who were bent on rebellion and that the rest of the Jews of Palestine

were innocently caught up in, and suffered in, the war. Similarly, here Josephus ended the story

saying KmL oL iev 65i 6L& KCKLCV T'ooapov d&v6p6v TlXULUvovro Tif TrO6XEWo ("So for the

wickedness of four men they [the Jews] were banished from the city").155 This story seems

designed to serve as a prime example of the prejudices Jews constantly faced, and the unfairness

of the actions that resulted from them. As the story stands in Josephus, it strikes the reader that

the punishment here (banishment of all Jews) does not fit the crime (the deception of four of

them). It was presented as a story of wide-scale unfair treatment of Jews. Such, according to

Josephus, was the world in which Jews lived. It was a world in which lurid stories about Jews

abounded, a world in which tales of Jewish offenses against society and culture circulated freely,

and a world in which those tales were believed and used as justification for widespread

mistreatment of Jews and for interference in Jewish religious practices. That is, even though the

present story was embarrassing, Josephus risked telling this story to make another point, a point

consonant with his overall portrayal of Jews to Greeks and Romans: that this should not be

understood as a story that describes typical Jewish behavior. This was not the action of the

majority, but of a few.

However, this story of the expulsion of the Jews in 19 CE is also related by Suetonius, Dio

Cassius, and Tacitus, where we learn that there were other factors at work. Suetonius says

Extemas caerimonias, Aegyptios ludaicosque ritus compescuit, coactis qui superstition ea
tenebantur religiosas uestes cum instrument omni comburere. Iudaeorum iuuentutem per


155 AJ 18.84.









species sacramenti in prouincias grauioris caeli distribuit, reliquos gentis eiusdem uel
similia sectantes urbe summouit, sub poena perpetuae seruitutis nisi obtemperassent.
Expulit et mathematics, sed deprecantibus ac se artem desituros promittentibus ueniam
dedit.

("He abolished foreign cults, especially the Egyptian and the Jewish rites, compelling all
who were addicted to such superstitions to burn their religious vestments and all their
paraphernalia. Those of the Jews who were of military age he assigned to provinces of less
healthy climate, ostensibly to serve in the army; the others of that same race or of similar
beliefs he banished from the city, on pain of slavery for life if they did not obey. He
banished the astrologers as well, but pardoned such as begged for indulgence and promised
to give up their art").156

The classification of Judaism along with Egyptian rites and (eastern) astrology is telling,

According to Suetonius, the emperor apparently thought that the Jews were part of a larger influx

into Rome of foreign practices and eastern influences which were viewed as socially and

culturally unhealthy. The expulsion of the Jews was, it could have been argued, an act of

Tiberius' zeal for the traditional gods of Rome and for Roman society in general. Tacitus, who

also feared any non-Roman influences, wrote of this incident:

.... actum et de sacris Aegyptiis ludaicisque pellendis factumque patrum consultum ut
quattuor milia libertini generis ea superstition infecta quis idonea aetas in insulam
Sardiniam veherentur, coercendis illic latrociniis et, si ob gravitatem caeli interissent, vile
damnum; ceteri cederent Italia nisi certam ante diem profanos ritus exuissent.

("....There was a debate too about expelling the Egyptian and Jewish worship, and a
resolution of the Senate was passed that 4000 of the freedmen class who were infected
with those superstitions and were of military age should be transported to the island of
Sardinia, to curb the brigandage of the place, a cheap sacrifice should they die from the
pestilential climate. The rest were to leave Italy, unless before a certain day they repudiated
their impious rites.").157

This corresponds to a mention of an earlier expulsion in 139 BCE. Valerius Maximus reported:

Chaldaeos igitur Cornelius Hispalus urbe expulit et intra decem dies Italia abire iussit, ne
peregrinam scientiam venditarent. Iudaeos quoque, qui Romanis tradere sacra sua conati
erant, idem Hispalus urbe exterminavit arasque privatas e publicis locis abiecit.


156 Tib. 36.
157 Ann. 2.85.









"Cornelius Hispalus therefore expelled the Chaldeans from the city and ordered them to
leave Italy within ten days, and that they should not sell their foreign knowledge. The Jews
also, who had tried to pass their sacred things on to the Romans, the same Hispalus
banished from the city and he threw their private altars out of public places."

The Romans had a long history of being suspicious of foreign influences. It makes much more

sense to interpret the expulsion of Jews from Rome in 19 CE in this light than it does to interpret

it as the result of one incident of fraud that affected one Roman family. Dio Cassius sheds further

light on the incident as he reports To;v TE 'Iou a6ov TroXXv iI. T v 'POGrlv V ouvEXOOVT)ov KCL

ouXvoi (;x LV ETTLOLpLiv T& oGETEpa 'EOv t EOL Favov, Toi~ TrXEL(iovca E'AXLaoEV ("As many

Jews came to Rome in great numbers and were converting many of the natives to their ways, he

banished most of them").158 Apparently the Jews had become successful enough at proselytizing

that Judaism was making inroads into Roman society, and this aroused the emperor's suspicion.

Proselytizing could itself be viewed as an activity that proclaimed the Jewish rejection of the

Roman gods and the Roman way of life.159 Tacitus complained of converts to Judaism: Nam

pessimus quisque spretis religionibuspatriis tribute et stipes illuc congerebant, unde auctae

ludaeorum res ("For whoever are the worst people, having scorned their ancetral religions, kept

giving tribute payments and offerings, from which the wealth of the Jews increased").160 The

combination of success at proselytizing plus the sense that Jews were part of a suspicious eastern

influx into Rome made them ripe targets for imperial expulsion. As the Romans told this story,

then, the emperor's actions were about maintaining Roman purity. It had certain ethnic overtones

and depicted the Jews as foreign and unwelcome.

The way in which Josephus chose to relate this story, however, provided the scenario of

unfairness and innocence he was trying to communicate to his Hellenistic audience. Gone from


158 D.C. 57.18.6a.
159 Daniel, 'Anti-Semitism in the Hellenistic-Roman Period', 62-4.
160 Hist. 5.5.









his account are any suggestions that the Jews were introducing non-Roman things into Rome or

pushing a foreign religion. That would have only reinforced the popular view of Jewish

otherness. The lack of this information in Josephus' version instead made the Jews appear just

like any other inhabitants of Rome. On the literary level, Josephus presented the Jews as insiders

who, for reasons that were completely unfair, were treated like outsiders. The harsh nature of the

punishment, as it is portrayed, also bespeaks the attitude Josephus was addressing, that of

popular prejudice against Jews. The banishment of all Jews over this incident makes sense only

if there is already a strong suspicion against all Jews within the social and cultural context. How

many scams were foisted in the name of religious contributions to Jerusalem we cannot know.

Surely there were others, and even if they were not common, the emperor's harsh reaction seems

to suggest that the action of these Jews only served to confirm what was already the prevailing

public impression of Jews among the inhabitants of Rome, viz. that Jews were maliciously

deceptive, that they were a threat to the well-being of Romans everywhere, and that they were up

to no good.

Even when it was risky, Josephus presented those stories in the relation between Jews and

Rome wherein true Jewish religious devotion could be seen. In fact, it was quite bold on

Josephus' part to address his apologetic agenda in this fashion. Rather than downplay or ignore

episodes that tended to demonstrate characteristics of Jews that were deemed foreign and un-

Roman, Josephus told those stories but advised his readers, through his narrative presentation,

that it would be a mistake to see in them supposed elements of alienation. Instead, he argued,

they demonstrate the best qualities of these people. This double public persona of being pious yet

at the same time being accused of all kinds of evil, is reflected in Satire 14 of Juvenal (who was

Josephus' contemporary) which says Romanas autem soliti contemnere leges ludaicum ediscunt









et seruant ac metuunt ius, tradidit arcano quodcumque volumine Moyses ("they are in the habit

of disregarding Roman laws, yet they memorize and guard and fear Jewish duty, all that Moses

handed down in his secret book").161

Conclusion

Josephus intended his Greek readers to see leading Jewish historical figures as equal to

great figures in Greek history. To a Hellenistic reader unfamiliar with the LXX accounts, and

who read only Josephus' versions of the stories, the impression would have been basically

straightforward. From the title of the work, to its concerns for order, to connections with well-

known Greek figures, to its use of exempla, such a reader would have felt basically at home with

much in the Antiquitates Judaicae. Some particularly Jewish elements in the stories were

preserved because, in Josephus' judgment, they highlighted virtues that were unique to the Jews

in the ancient world, even when those stories ran the risk of touching on negative stereotypes of

Jews. Other elements of the stories were either ignored (like the Jewish practice of circumcision),

downplayed (like the Jewish claim to the land of Palestine), or transformed by casting them in

Greek forms (as seen in his use of particular Greek terms to describe facets of Jewish culture).

He was able to adapt his stories in this way partly because the traditions he knew, and the milieu

in which he wrote, allowed him some flexibility. His rewriting of those stories was in step with

the historiographical conventions of his day, and the fluid nature of foundational myths gave

Josephus room to emphasize, or create, dimensions of his traditional materials to suit his aim of

aligning Greek and Jewish ethnicities, or to omit elements of the tradition that did not serve his

purpose.

Confirmation that it was his specific intention to create this alignment of Jewish and Greek

characteristics comes in a statement Josephus himself made about the Antiquitates Judaicae later

161 Lines 100-02.









in the Contra Apionem. Apion had charged that the Jews had no great intellectuals in their

history. 'AAA& Oau[aocoiu Uv6pac o01 TrapeoXCKcEa v o[ov Ov TEXv C TLvCoV eiperT&fc i ooLa

6LtaEpovUTa KmL KaaptLOUpLL oKKpfTlIV KML Z'vova KaL KXE&VOTrv KaL TOLOi6ou( TLV(U ... TrepiL

6'e T)V Trap' T1^iLV dLV6pcdv yEyovToWv o U6EVO6 ]TUTOV E'TrCLVOU YuyXUVELV wLoV 'L(oCaoLv oL TCaLL

T14ETE paL; apXaLoLoyLaL; EvTuylXdvovtUe ("But [he says that] we have not provided illustrious

men such as inventors of any arts or men distinguished in wisdom, and he enumerates Socrates

and Zeno and Cleanthes and some other such ones. ... Those who have read my Archaeologies

know, concerning the men we have produced, that there has been no one found less worthy of

praise").162 The Jews deserved the same praise as Greeks because they were, in Josephus' hands,

basically the same people culturally.

The Antiquitates Judaicae was more than Jewish history for Greek readers. That was

already available to the Hellenistic world in the LXX. Josephus went well beyond simply telling

the stories. He re-made the history and, in the process, re-made the people who were its subject.

Through the vehicle of historiography Josephus was re-inventing Jewish identity, he was re-

drawing the ethnic lines that separated Jews from others, he was creating a Jewish ethnicity

which (he hoped) would allow Jews a regular place in Hellenistic society.


162 Ap. 2.135f.









CHAPTER 7
JEWISH ETHNICITY IN JOSEPHUS' VITA AND CONTRA APIONEM

Josephus' Vita and his Contra Apionem were both written to answer criticisms. In the

former, he reacted mostly to criticisms about his own conduct during the war. In the latter, he

answered derogatory statements about the Jews made by intellectuals of his day. The nature of

these works meant that there was more apologetic and polemic in them than would appear in an

historical account, and subsequently there is less of the program of ethnicity-building than

appears in the Bellum Judaicum or the Antiquitates Judaicae. The fact that these two later works

had to be written at all was something of an admission on Josephus' part that his major works

had failed to persuade his readers concerning Josephus' role in the war (for the Bellum

Judaicum) and his portrait of Jewish culture (for the Antiquitates Judaicae). "Josephus believes

that it is his 'duty' (6tev) to defend his people, but his persistence is nothing other than a

confession that he has failed in his attempt, and it confirms the vigor of the anti-Semitism

existing in Rome."1 Both of these lesser works still, therefore, had non-Jewish readers in mind,

and in both works he continued to depict himself and the Jews in ways that were essentially

Greek.

The Vita

Josephus' Vita, written after both the Bellum Judaicum and the Antiquitates Judaicae, was

not a full-scale autobiography, but was a response to an assault on his character brought by a

rival, Justus of Tiberias, who had written an account of the war that slandered Josephus. The Vita

begins with Josephus' genealogy, a claim that he was something of a child prodigy, his religious


1 G. Hata, 'The Story of Moses', 195. cf also Spilsbury, 'Contra Apionem and
Antiquitates Judaicae: Points of Contact', in L. Feldman and J. Levison (eds.), Josephus' Contra
Apionem: Studies in Its Character and Cuiie\ x i /h a Latin Concordance to the Portion Missing
in Greek (Arbeiten zur Geschichte des Antiken Judentums und des Urchristentums 34, Leiden
1996) 367.









experimentation, and a story of his participation in a delegation to Rome when he was 26 years

old. The purpose of this prefatory material was to argue that Josephus had been an upright,

respectable person all his life. After that the account is absorbed with his personal conduct during

the First Jewish War. Because the Vita centers around Josephus personally, there are fewer

indications of his view of the ethnicity of Jewish people as a group. However, Hellenistic

standards served as part of the conceptual foundation for the work as well as provided models for

specific responses.

The fact that Josephus wrote an apologetic autobiography itself reflects a point I have

already noted, that the credibility of an ancient Greek historian's work was measured in part by

the character and conduct of the historian himself. In Jewish culture and literature, however,

credibility was usually established on other grounds. Jewish authors writing in a Jewish vein

often emphasized some notion of divine authority, themselves fading into the background as

divine instruction took over, or they established credibility by assuming a pseudonym (especially

of a Biblical character) or by advertising their reputation as defenders of their ancestral faith

(either through apology, polemic, or expertise in the Torah). The fact that Josephus defended

himself, even though he claimed to be a prophet and an expert in the Torah, suggests that he was

writing with Greek standards of credibility in mind, not Jewish ones. In other words, the mode

by which Josephus here establishes his credibility is Greek, not Jewish. In this way he continued

to portray himself like a Greek historian, suggesting to his reader that the history he produced is

to be read according to that form.

This appeal to an historian's personal life as the basis for the credibility of his work is also

reflected in Josephus' criticisms of Justus of Tiberias. Justus' account has not survived, but

Rajak has reasoned that it must have portrayed Josephus as two-faced, a man playing to Roman









interests yet all the while an insurrectionist at heart, and that Josephus' piety may have been

questioned as well.2 In Vita 338-67 Josephus launched his specific rebuttals of Justus. He got to

the heart of the matter when he said (as if Justus were present before him) KCL ciL 4tE TCrm a 6i

T'roXLTELCL oou o0(X))(- E[4laVL'OUOLV TO6 V T PLOV Tbv UXXov KMCL OTjL 0) C iTrV TTrcXpL5~6 'P)LPa ,oV

dT~TEorTlocU ("and your political dealings after these things clearly show your life differently, and

that it was you who led the revolt against the Romans").3 This statement summarizes several

specific criticisms raised in the following sections of the Vita. In the end, Josephus claimed that

Justus' personal behavior discredited him. The thing to note is that Josephus was holding Justus

to a Greek standard of credibility.

Justus' lost account no doubt largely focused on the revolt in Galilee and also contained a

description of the siege of Jerusalem. In chapter five I noted that one of the criteria of a good

Greek historian by the first century CE was that he was an eyewitness of the things he reported.

In Vita 358 Josephus charged that Justus' account of the revolt in Galilee surely must be suspect,

because it failed to meet this criterion. Justus was not present in the places where key parts of the

history unfolded. According to Josephus, Justus was in Berytus4 at the time and thus was in no

position to say what happened in Galilee, at Jotapata (the city Josephus defended against the

Romans), or in Jerusalem. Justin's account was therefore to be rejected by the general reading

public because Justus failed to meet the Greek standard of a good historian.

In the account of his religious experimentation, Josephus relates that he finally settled

upon the sect of the Pharisees, which, he says Trapakrr Ao eL6o Cu T Tr cap' "EXXi)rOLv TO"LKK




2 Rajak, 'Justus of Tiberias', 357.
3 Vit. 344.
4 Vit. 357. Berytus is modern-day Beirut, Lebanon. In Josephus' day it was in the
Phoenician region of Syria. It is approximately 60 linear miles from the Sea of Galilee.









Aeyo[ev 1 ("which is nearly the same as that which is called the Stoics by the Greeks").5 We see

here the same kind of approach that characterized certain depictions in the Antiquitates Judaicae:

describing Jewish institutions with familiar Greek terms, yet stopping short of equating the two.

In this way what was uniquely Jewish was not lost, but was accommodated to Hellenistic

standards. A fuller explanation of the beliefs of Pharisees, as Josephus understood them (or at

least as he wanted them to be understood) appeared in Bellum Judaicum 2.162-3, 166 and

Antiquitates Judaicae 18:12-15.6 Here in the Vita he could have easily either rehearsed them or

he could have simply referred his reader to the pertinent section of his previous works (as he

does in Antiquitates Judaicae 13.173 and 18.11). Instead he chose now to go further and

compare them closely to a philosophical sect within Hellenistic culture. The comparison counted

on the assumption that the reader did not know much about the Pharisees in the first place,

because a closer examination would have revealed several significant differences between

Pharisees and Stoics. Josephus' description basically erased the line between Jewish culture and

Hellenistic culture, and a non-Jewish reader who was unfamiliar with Jewish sectarianism would

have been under the impression that Pharisees and Stoics held to the same basic beliefs. Jewish

institutions were again brought into Roman culture through the door of Hellenism.

As noted before, at age 26 Josephus participated in a delegation to Rome to secure the

release of some Jewish priests who had been sent there on charges by the procurator of Judea, M.

Antonius Felix. The account appears in Vita 1.13ff. A noteworthy feature of this story is that

Josephus was careful to trace the network of social and political connections that got him to

Poppea and that enabled him to secure the release of the priests. He made a special point that



5 Vit. 12. The precise nuance of TrapUaTrr A.oLo is hard to determine from this context. The
word can mean "nearly resembling," "about the same," "similar," or "about equal to." LSJ 1321.
6 See alsoAJ 13.172.









there was a Jew, Aliturus (an actor), who was well-liked by Nero, and through this fellow-Jew he

was able to approach Poppea. The fact that there was a highly respected Jew among Nero's

friends was important for Josephus. Aliturus was a good example of a Jew who had successfully

made the transition from outsider to insider. He acts within the story as any other insider would,

able to use his influence for his friends. His appearance in the narrative is itself an apologetic for

Jewish mobility within Roman society. Then Josephus himself took on the role of the insider. He

formed connections with important people, and through them he was able to secure favors for

others. His language does not necessarily indicate that he got a personal audience with Poppea,

and Josephus probably would have made a bigger point of this had it actually happened.

Nevertheless, Josephus (at least on a literary level) had made the transition from outsider to

insider, a role in which he portrayed himself consistently as the account goes on. That the story

concerned Romans in the highest levels of civic life was not insignificant, for it bolstered the

image of friendly relations between Romans and Jews.

We would like to know about some of the periods in Josephus' adult life which he does not

cover in the Vita, especially the two-year period between his return to Palestine after

participating in the delegation to Nero and the time he was appointed commander of Jewish

forces in Jotapata.7 For example, how is it that the rulers in Jerusalem, who were priests and

Sadducees, asked Josephus, a priest who had rejected the sect of the Sadducees and chose to live

according to the sect of the Pharisees, to represent their concerns in Galilee, a place that

foreseeably was going to be absolutely crucial in the war? Some things about the picture do not

add up, and given what we know about the way in which Josephus suppressed unflattering

information in the Antiquitates Judaicae, we are suspicious about what Josephus has not told us



7 Cf G. Hata, 'Imagining Some Dark Periods in Josephus' Life', 309.









in the Vita. What we do have, however, is a picture of Josephus meeting the requirements of a

Greek historian and an Hellenistic "insider,"and that was what counted for him.

The Contra Apionem

The Contra Apionem was ostensibly written in response to criticisms leveled against the

Jews by well-known Greeks. While the Alexandrian grammarian Apion received much of the

attention, the introduction makes it clear that the real target audience of the Contra Apionem was

a nebulous "them" who had read, and rejected, Josephus' explanation of Jewish culture in his

Antiquitates Judaicae: 'IKv(; 4iv Uv i TOXUapvU) K0CL 6L& TTF Trepi triv apX aLOXoyL av ouyypa f;

Kp'ULOTE v6p6v 'ETrap6dLr TOL( EwvrTEUo0~VOL; CabUT TrETrOLrIKE'vcL 4Oavep6v Trepi TOD yivouv

T)t4V ix;V 'Iou6a&iv 6OL KCaL TraaLd6aTccv ETL ("I take it that it has been made sufficiently clear,

through the narrative of the Archaeology, most excellent Epaphroditus, to those who have read it,

concerning our Jewish race, that it is also most ancient").8 In the next section he mentions an

anonymous ouXvo ("large number of people") who had rejected what they read in the

Antiquitates Judaicae, and then in 1.3 he said it was his aim uTv p v XOL6opo6vro v Tiiv

6uoFiEVeLxLV KUcL TrV EKOUOLOV EXE yaLL lEU6 XOYLOV iLUv T 6 ie V &yvOLav LraUvopejoaoULa ("to

disprove those who accuse us of ill will and voluntary lies, and to correct the ignorance of

others"). Furthermore, it is clear that this ouXvoL are Greeks, for Josephus says his aim was to

answer them by producing literary witnesses who were esteemed by the Greeks: XpiooicaL 65

'TV 4[Lv UTr' E[ioU XEyoL V'VV Lp~aPUOL TOiL dULLOTLOTOTTOOLK EL'VCL TrEpi TraTorTI 4pXaLOXoy[ia Ur76

TOv 'EXXAvwv KEKpL iVOL; ("I will use for the things I have said the witnesses who are judged by

the Greeks to be most trustworthy concerning all antiquity)9-on the assumption that Greek

critics would be silenced by Greek evidence. If we are correct in our thesis that one of the


sAp. 1.1.
9 Ap. 1.4.









burdens of the Antiquitates Judaicae was to show the essentially Greek character of Jewish

ethnicity, then the rejection of the Antiquitates Judaicae must mean that Greeks readers, for

whom it was intended, had rejected that characterization of Jewish ethnicity.

The significance of this observation is that, as I have suggested, the Greeks were the very

group to which Josephus wished to join the Jews culturally. Their rejection of Josephus' program

needed serious attention. It would have been one thing to convince Romans that Jews were just

like Greeks culturally, but what if the Greeks were not buying it? What if Greek literati rejected

the comparison between Jews and Greeks? The Greeks knew what was Greek, and if they did not

see Jews as possessing Greek qualities, Josephus' enterprise was doomed to fail. Perhaps this

accounts for why the Contra Apionem had to be written, from Josephus' perspective.

Although Josephus called the Contra Apionem an arTroXoyLa,10 a notable difference between

this work and his other literary productions is that whereas there is a definite apologetic thread

running throughout all of them, the Contra Apionem added polemics to apologetics. This gave

the work an added sense of urgency, even beyond that which was seen in the Antiquitates

Judaicae. If the Antiquitates Judaicae was eager to show the Greek qualities of Jewish culture

(to the point of making strained comparisons), then the Contra Apionem was almost desperate to

do so. "What was set out obliquely in the national history of the Jews is set out more directly in

the CA."11 The difference between apologetics and polemics may be a fine line, but the terms

may be understood as suggesting that polemics is a more rhetorically-heightened form of

apologetic response. One of the purposes of polemics is "to change the opinions of the distant



10Ap. 2.147. o0 y&p EyK6c) Lov 'GiL v a~U[ d V Trpoe LdrlTvi ouyyp I eLV aUlX TroX& Kcd
EU6T5 KrTflyopouiEvoLt; rivLv MarUTrV UaTroXoyLav 6LKcL0oTLTrvV EL'vca vo C( ) ("I do not propose to
write an encomium about ourselves, but I consider this to be a most reasonable apology against
the many and false things that have been charged to us").
11 Spilsbury 367.









and the opposed (at least to cast doubt in their minds), and to arouse interest among the

indifferent and the uninvolved, with a view to eventually convincing them as well."12 Polemics

was the tool Josephus needed to forge a new Jewish ethnicity for Greeks (and their sympathetic

audience) who had rejected Josephus' proposal about the fundamentally Greek character of

Jewish identity. The apologetic nature of his major works expressed a psychological need to

conciliate Jews to the Hellenistic world, but polemics were needed to persuade those readers in

whom Josephus perceived a hostile rejection of his claims for Jewish ethnicity. I have noted in

chapter two that a psychological need for belonging, and posturing oneself for acceptance, are

hallmarks of an ethnical strategy. In the Contra Apionem we have it taken to the next level,

through polemics, because of the nature of the situation, viz. outspoken rejection of Jewish

claims to fit into Greek culture.

At the beginning of the Contra Apionem Josephus rehearsed the kinds of accusations that

prompted his response. They were 1) the charge that the history of the Jews did not go into

ancient times, as evidenced by the fact that the Jews were basically ignored by the Greek

historians who covered those times (the assumption being that if the Greek historians did not

mention it, it was not to be taken as fact13), 2) the charge that the Jews were not a pure race of

people, and 3) that they came to inhabit Palestine in an underhanded way. The first of these

charges received most of Josephus' attention, which indicates that something important was at

stake in it. "For Josephus the allegation of "lateness" was equivalent to the assertion of cultural

dependence and historical insignificance. ... Simply put, nothing could be both new and true."14





12 Kasher, 'Polemic and Apologetic Methods', 144.
13 SeeAp. 1.161.
14 Droge 125.









The Romans generally respected what was ancient.15 To say that Jewish culture was not ancient

was therefore to say that it deserved no respect. What is interesting here, as Gruen has noted, is

that this was not a typical Greek complaint concerning other peoples.16 This suggests that

Josephus may have been dealing more with perceived sentiment than an actual one, and that

the real issue that concerned him was not the antiquity of the Jews but the Greek assessment of

Jews. In responding to the charge of lateness, Josephus echoed and amplified the criticism he

offered in Bellum Judaicum 1.13-16, that Greek historiography was overrated as far as coverage

of the remote past was concerned. He established this in the Contra Apionem by applying the

standards of Greek historiography to the Greek historians themselves. In particular, Josephus

pointed out that the oldest Greek historians and philosophers did not belong to the remote past

themselves and were indebted to other sources for their information.17 They were not

contemporaries of the events they reported, and since the Greeks themselves did not keep

historical records very well, the historians had no reliable Greek eyewitness testimony to which

they could appeal.18 In short, they did not meet their own standards for good historiography. The

result was that Greek historical knowledge of the distant past (specifically, prior to the Persian

invasions) was a mess, and there was little agreement among the Greek historians concerning it.

In raising this defense, Josephus was actually echoing Plato's Laws, where Clinias

admitted that Greek civilization was, in Plato's day, relatively recent.19 Clinias there, speaking of

the events of ancient times, says ) 'E~roc dETrErv &6 Kcd Trpwdrv yeyovora ("they happened, so to


15 Cf the statement made by Tacitus about Jewish Sabbath observance, noted earlier: Hi
ritus quoquo modo inducti antiquitate defenduntur ("This worship, however it was introduced, is
defended by its antiquity") (Hist. 5.5).
16 E. Gruen, 'Greeks and Jews: Mutual Misperceptions in Josephus' Contra Apionem', in
C. Bakhos (ed.), Ancient Judaism in its Hellenistic Context (SupJSJ 95, Leiden 2005) 40.
17 Ap. 1.7-14, 44-6.
1 Ap. 15-22.
19 3.677d; cf. Timaeus 22ac.









speak, only yesterday and the day before"). Josephus said iXOXe 6"i Kcdi rpclrv ... (aLvovrat

yeyovoTe ("they appear to have happened yesterday or the day before").20 Herodotus likewise

made it clear that Egyptian history went much further back than Greek history21 and explicitly

admitted that the Greeks did not learn of the origin of their gods "until yesterday or the day

before, as they say" (obK TiTrLorta&o piXpt oi TrpGrlv TE KcdL E fi ( LTrEiL AO6y).22 "In the

Hellenistic period the same point would be made again and again by native writers who had

learned to compose history in Greek fashion."23 Pointing out the lack of Greek knowledge of

ancient times was thus a Greek thing to do, and Josephus appeared quite Greek in doing it.

There were other reasons the Jews did not appear in the Greek historians. Josephus argued

that the Jews had no significant contact with the Greeks because they were not a seafaring

people, and thus the Greek historians naturally knew little about them, just as they also knew

little about other great nations such as the Iberians or the Romans.24 He added that the lack of

historical accuracy among the Greeks was due to the fact that the Greek historians were too

preoccupied with literary style and not enough with veracity, that the former interfered with the

latter because inventiveness was valued over truthfulness,25 and that general malice toward the

Jews also explained why no Greek writer mentioned them.26 With these replies, Josephus

excused the Jews from attaining a prominent place in the works of Greek historians.

The standards that made Greek historiography look bad when it came to the distant past

made Jewish history look good. Josephus claimed that the Jews had always treated the



20 Ap. 2.154.
21 2.143.
22 2.53.
23 Drodge 120.
24 Ap. 1.60-8.
25 Ap. 1.24-7.
26 Ap. 1.213-4.









documents of the Biblical canon with the greatest respect (in contrast to the nearly indifferent

attitude of Greeks toward their historical records), and that it contained "the record of all time"

(Toi5 Trcv6; 'ExovUra Xpvou Utrv Avaxypaxlv),27 spanning about 5000 years.28 That is, if one used

conventional Greek standards of historical trustworthiness, the Jews outdid the Greeks

themselves. The same kind of favorable comparison appears later in 2.171f, where Josephus

claimed that the Jewish legal approach combined the best qualities of both Athenian and Spartan

laws: the Athenian system emphasized legal prescription, and the Spartan system emphasized

practical training, but the Jewish system had both. In both cases the point was that the Jews had

achieved the ideal the Greeks had proposed but themselves failed to reach.

For reliable information on the remote past, Josephus argued that one would have to read

the ancient records of the civilizations of the Egyptians (via Manetho), the Babylonians (via

Berosus), and the Phoenicians (via an otherwise unknown author named Dius), all of which he

quoted at length.29 Unlike the Greek records, these accounts went far into the past, and they

clearly established the antiquity of the Jews. Even while he was busy defending this particular

point, however, the business of connecting the Jews with the Greeks was never far behind. If the

authorities he had already cited were not enough to satisfy a Greek reader, Josephus then cited

two lists of Greek names to show that the Greeks had known about the Jews for a long time. The

first list names Pythagoras, Theophrastus, Herodotus, Choerilus, Aristotle, Hecataeus, and

Agatharchides, and the second list names Theophilus, Theodotus, Mnaseas, Aristophanes,

Hermogenes, Euhemerus, Conon, Zopyrion, Demetrius Phalarus, Philo the elder, and Eupolemus


27Ap. 1.38.
28 Ap. 1.1; cf. AJ 1.13.
29 Ap. 1.69-160.









-the last three of which are especially commended.30 These lists of Greek names were surely

intended to be impressive. The sense is that there was a kind of familiarity between the ancient

Greeks and Jews.

Josephus wanted to have the best of both worlds, and this created a problem that appears in

two ways. First, he provided perfectly good explanations for why the Jews did not appear in

Greek history, but then he adduced these two lists of references to Jews in the works of Greek

historians. Apparently it did not occur to Josephus that these two approaches might be mutually

exclusive. This same technique appeared in Josephus' major works, where he juxtaposed a

Jewish theology of retribution with a Greek view of XrlT to explain historical events. Here as

well as there, two different lines of reasoning created an unresolved tension in the argument.

Second, Josephus criticized Greek historical knowledge for its inability to go into the distant

past, but then he cited two lists of Greek authors as evidence in his argument for the antiquity of

the Jewish people. If the antiquity of the Jews was the main concern, the argument is self-

contradictory. If, however, the main concern was to create the impression of a close agreement

between Jews and Greeks culturally, then the evidence has a different function, namely to re-

affirm the close cultural connections between Greeks and Jews. This inconsistency in Josephus'

method serves to confirm our suspicion, noted above, that the real issue for Josephus in the

Contra Apionem was not the antiquity of the Jews, but the Greek rejection of Jewish claims to be

the cultural equals of Greeks.

The actual evidence that comes from these lists is mostly speculative over-reaching if not

incorrect. As factual arguments they leave much to be desired. On the first list, for the authors he

explicitly quotes, his "evidence" is less than sure. For example, his so-called evidence of


30 Ap. 1.161-218.









Herodotus' knowledge of the Jews is the historian's notice of the "Syrians of Palestine who

practice circumcision" (2.104.3).31 However, this is a reference to Philistines, not Jews.32

Similarly, Josephus cites the poet Choerilus as a witness, but the evidence consists of the poet's

mention of yvoc 0auctaoTbv '6ioOcaU yXl)ooav piv FoLvLoocv &7r LOOoro[)V & roiE'Vo (")KEOV 6'

Ev OXU[L( potpEotL TrXaTwri Trap XL[VTI aucbXadXEOL KOPuI & TpOXOKOUpdeG aUj~&p icTrepOev i'LrTr v

6apT& TrpoowTr' iE6pouv EoKAXrTKdOT KaTVV C ("a race wonderful to see, uttering the Phoenician

language from their mouths. They were living in the Solymian mountains, by a broad lake,

having dark heads shaved around, and above them they wore smoke-dried skins stripped from

horses' heads"),33 concerning which Josephus says 6il ov oiv orTLV ~ol(~a' Trr~oLv i TrV v aUr~6v

eLvfloOUL ("I think it is clear to all that he had us in mind").34 However, Choerlius used

Herodotus (7.70) as his source for these people, and Herodotus was describing Ethiopians, not

Jews. The Solymian mountains are similarly mentioned in connection with the Ethiopians in the

Odyssey 5.282f.35 Josephus misunderstood the reference, blinded by his zeal to make

connections between Jews and Greeks. To those who knew the works of Herodotus or Choerlius

better, this blunder would surely have cast doubt on Josephus' scholarship.

The second list of authors is even more problematic. The way Josephus summarily cites

them by name only, but with no quotations to prove his point, is suspicious. "...none of these

writers can be identified with absolute certainty. ... Josephus is able to give an illusory

impression of scholarship, but it remains doubtful whether he knew any of these historians at





31 Quoted in Ap. 1.169.
32 Gruen, 'Greeks and Jews: Mutual Misperceptions', 42.
33 Ap. 1.173.
34 Ap. 1.174.
35 Gabba 655-6.









first hand."36 Gruen is even more skeptical. Concerning the last three names on the list, whom

Josephus especially commends, he says:

We may be confident that each of these writers was, in fact, a Jew, writing under a Greek
pseudonym. That is surely true of Hecataeus and almost as surely of Philo, Demetrius, and
Eupolemus. Josephus ought to have known this-and probably did. ... he was perfectly
happy, even proud, to parade Greek authors, or what he took to be Greek authors, as
confirming the favorable impressions and the prestige that Jews enjoyed among the
intelligensia of the Mediterranean world.37

In spite of the fact that Josephus was probably speaking past the facts, he was doing what Jewish

apologists normally did, looking for any possible allusion to Jews in Greek authors.38

It is in this attempt to connect the Jews with the Greeks as closely as possible that we

encounter one of the most fabulous stories in Josephus' works. In Contra Apionem 1.176-182,

Josephus tells a story, gleaned from the writings of Clearchus of Soli, of how Aristotle once met

with a Jew, presumably at Assos,39 and was favorably impressed with him. Quite significant for

Josephus' purposes were the words Clearchus put in Aristotle's mouth about the Jewish fellow:

oiro v oUv 06 vOpUroo EiTrLevotEvoEV TE TroXXoL~ KU(K ix;V v6 TOiTOrV dEL Toib Ei'O9Xrraarrou

6TOKKaTpcavov *'ErTVLK 6( v ou 06 T6LCtIxKTo [Lvov &dX& KCiL T JuXi ("This man, being

shown hospitality by many, and having come down from the upper regions to those which are by

the sea, was Greek not only in language but also in spirit").40 According to Clearchus, Aristotle

even admitted to his followers that the Jew taught him more than he was able to teach the Jew.41


36 Droge 124-5.
37 Gruen, 'Greeks and Jews: Mutual Misperceptions', 42-3.
38 Here he was following in the steps of Demetrius, Pseudo-Eupolemus, and Artapanus.
Gabba, 'The Growth of Anti-Judaism', 618, 638-41.
39 H. Lewy, 'Aristotle and the Jewish Sage According to Clearchus of Soli', HTR 31
(1938) 207; also B. Bar-Kochva, 'The Wisdom of the Jew and the Wisdom of Aristotle', in J.
Kalms and F. Siegert (eds.), Internationales Josephus-Kolloquium Brissel 1998 (Minster 1998)
241.
40 Ap. 1.181.
41 Greek Trapi606ou tL i&AXXov v ELXEv. Bar-Kochva ('The Wisdom of the Jew', 245-47)
has argued that the passage cannot mean this, however. Instead, he argues, the passage should be









The Jew was received warmly among the Ionian Greeks and had no less a figure than Aristotle

himself to testify to the excellence of Jewish philosophy and moral virtue.

It stretches credibility to think that the story is true as it stands. For one thing, it contains a

factual error. In the story Clearchus described the Jews as descendants of the Indian Kalanoi, but

there was no such caste.42 Furthermore, the form of the quotation-prefaced and ended with a

warning that material will be omitted, and picking up in the middle of the story-suggests that

Josephus has been highly selective from his source and has omitted details that would have made

the Jewish character seem more foreign.43 As I have shown, this was standard practice for

Josephus as he carefully managed negative impressions. The story probably tells us more about

Clearchus' musings about Jews than anything else, for it reflects a common ancient Greek belief

that easterners had a strange and wonderful kind of wisdom and philosophy, but it also served to

demonstrate Josephus' contention that the Jews were not a recently-derived race of people

(contra Apion). Most of all, it has a well-respected Greek referring to a Jew as one who was

Greek in his language and in his spirit. A better endorsement of Jewish intellectual culture would

have been hard to imagine, yet Josephus was careful not to over-play the story. As it stands the

story hints that some of Aristotle's brilliance was due to his encounter with this Jew, and hence

with Jewish intellectualism, but it does not belabor the notion.

Further alignment of Jews with Greeks was achieved when Josephus compared the two on

the matter of national slanders: OEOTro'irro p'ev Trv 'AOirvaim v trv 65 AXKE&6LovVLGV



read as "he rather conveyed something of the things he had," taking i&xxov in an absolute sense
instead of as a comparative. Reading the words this way results in the passage asserting that this
Jewish fellow had integrated himself enough into Greek culture sufficiently to engage Aristotle
in conversation on substantial philosophical topics. This is how Clement understood the passage,
Strom. 1.15.
42 Bar-Kochva, 'The Wisdom of the Jew', 247.
43 Lewy 223-6; Gabba, 'The Growth of Anti-Judaism', 621.









noXuKpwr(1 6( 6' 5r6v TpLTro.XLLK6v ypa'*cU ou y&p 6 1 OEO6Trolrr61 -OTLV (v o'iOVTUC TLVE- KcML

Triv OT1Pcdov Tr6OXLV TrpooaCEapEV TroX&a 65 KaL TitcaLO Ev TXLL LoTopcL'LK Trepi iTGV

TrpoeLprtievov K0CL Trepi AloXXv pepX oaifll4Kev ("Theopompus slandered Athens, Polycrates

slandered Sparta, and the one who wrote the Tripoliticus (for he certainly was not Theopompus

as some think) fastened upon Thebes, and Timaeus in his histories slandered many of those just

mentioned and others also").44 The Jews were in good Greek company here, even if what they

had in common was that they both had been the victims of malicious literary defamation. This is

reminiscent of the implicit comparison noted in the Bellum Judaicum, where the impression was

created that the Jewish experience in the First Jewish War was much like the experience of the

Greeks at the hands of their enemies. Another function of the story was that it put the Jews side-

by-side with the Greeks in popular sentiment. I noted in chapter three that Roman admiration of

the Greeks was also tempered with contempt, so even in their experience of contempt, the Jews

had something in common with the Greeks. In Contra Apionem 2.130 he again compared the

Jews' national misfortunes with those of the Greeks as he refuted the slander that Jewish history

was full of defeats. So was the history of others, Josephus replied, including the Greeks. Defeat,

says Josephus, does not mean the victims were inferior people. ouvdei.j wvnei,disen tau/ta toi/j

paqou/sin ("No one reproached those who suffered these things").45 In the same passage he

latently compared the destruction of the Jerusalem temple to the destruction of the famous

shrines in Athens, Ephesus, and Delphi. Again, the Jews were in very good Greek company here.

I have noted that Josephus, in his major works, used Greek terms to describe various

aspects of Jewish culture even when those terms did not precisely fit (terms such as LXooocao').

In the Contra Apionem, however, Josephus went even farther and actually invented a new word:


44Ap. 1.221.
45 Ap. 2.131.









OEoKpariLa. It appears in his explanation of the Mosaic legal code: 6 6' TI[erEpo voio0eirt; e'l

[Ev TOUvTo)V OU60oTLOuV cdTrEiL6v o 6' &v TL( E'LTrOL pLc CFcU4vo TO6V X,6yov OEoKpUccL'v cdTrE6ELE Tb

TrOXLLTEUa cO OE T iv &p~iv Kcd Tb KpaTO( &vacOEL; ("But our legislator envisioned none of these

[other kinds of governments], but he created the government which one might call by a strained

expression a Theocracy, attributing authority and power to God").46 The fact that he used the

word prefaced by a kind of apology (it is "a strained expression") surely indicates that Josephus

coined this word.47 There was no term in either Hebrew or Aramaic that was equivalent to it. The

Jewish TrOXLuL tca is a OEOKparci, Josephus says.

As ingenious as this was, again the term does not exactly seem to fit. There are at least two

problems here. First, the picture from the canonical Biblical texts is that God delivered the law to

Moses, who then taught it to the people. A law of divine origin was a common-enough idea in

the Ancient Near East,48 but not necessarily in Hellenic culture. The Greek concept of a

TrOXLUtEUia involved a different idea, that of a legislator (a vo[oo&erit) who assigned specific roles

to various parts of the state.49 Josephus changed the Biblical picture to fit a Hellenistic mold. The

problem is that, technically, Josephus has Moses as the author of the TroULtEUIia, who then assigns

God the role of chief legal authority.5o In attempting to describe the Jewish "constitution" as a

TrOXLTEUiaU of the great lawgiver Moses, he therefore actually had God in a subordinate role,



46 Ap. 2.165.
47 Amir, 'Josephus on the Mosaic "Constitution"', 20.
48 For example, the famous stele that records the Code of Hammurabi depicts, at the top,
the king in the presence of the god Shamash, receiving symbols of authority (a rod and a ring).
The implication is that the laws Hammurabi published had divine authority behind them, if not
divine origin. Shamash was, among other things, a god of justice.
49 Some (like Plato) claimed divine origin for laws, but most Greeks seem to have viewed
this as a ploy to get people to obey them. Cf Str. 16.2.39: TCB0T y&p OTr(o Twrori AXTrlOeL' 'EiXL,
Trcap& ye TOtL; avpoiTrOLt ETrErTOTEUTO KUCL EVEV'LLoro ("For these things, whatever truth they
have, are believed and enacted by men").
50 Amir, 'Josephus on the Mosaic "Constitution"', 22.









"which seems to be the consequence of grafting a religious concept onto a secular

background."51 As I noted concerning the Antiquitates Judaicae, sometimes Josephus' zeal to

relate the Jews to the Greeks resulted in an anomaly. Second, Josephus explicitly distanced the

Mosaic TrOXLTiEUx from three other forms of government that were well-known to his readers:

monarchies, oligarchies, and republics.52 In doing so he mimicked Plato, who similarly rejected

all other forms of government for a unified system that bore the name of the god who provided

its justice.53 This conscious distancing of Jewish culture from Hellenistic culture, even though

following a Greek model (Plato) to do it, seems unusual for an author who otherwise strained to

make Jewish institutions look as Greek as possible, but it is understandable when we remember

that there are some things about Judaism that Josephus was not at all ready to surrender to

Hellenism, and chief on that list was always Jewish religious practices and ethics. Josephus saw

the Jewish TroXL EuLa as inextricably bound up with Jewish religion. To describe the government

in purely secular terms would have been to give up the unique religious content of it, and this he

would not do. We have here, therefore, a place in which Josephus seems to have been caught

between managing a Hellenistic impression for his readers on the one hand, and preserving his

Jewish religious sensibilities on the other hand. His solution, technically, failed at both. In an

ironic way, however, Josephus' invention of this word managed to answer another criticism that

had been leveled against the Jews, namely that the Jews had nothing innovative in their history.54

Another criticism Apion leveled against the Jews was that they settled in a poorly-chosen

place in Alexandria:


51 Amir, 'Josephus on the Mosaic "Constitution"', 22.
52 Ap. 2.164.
53 Pl., Lg. 4.713a. cf Y. Amir, 'Theokratia as a Concept of Political Philosophy', Scripta
Classica Israelica 8-9 (1989) 83-105.
54 Ap. 2.135.









EKpoXacLa ("they settled at the harborless sea, near the pounding of the waves"),55 and he

expressed surprise that the Jews there should even be acknowledged as Alexandrians. Clearly

Apion had portrayed the Jews as outsiders in an extreme way, not even worthy of association

with the city in which they lived. Josephus' rebuttal to this quickly turned into a discussion of

Jewish privileges not only in Alexandria but in other major centers of the Hellenistic world. The

Jewish presence in that part of Alexandria was, according to Josephus, due to the grant of

Alexander himself and was further confirmed by the Ptolemaic monarchs,56 public monuments,

and Caesar. The combination of both Greek and Roman recognition is emphatic. Public

recognition of the Jews' rightful place in this leading Hellenistic city was an important matter,

especially for Josephus' program of ethnicity-building. According to him, then, the Jews rightly

bore the title of "Alexandrians" just as was the custom in other places:

Tr/VTE( y&p oL (0EL UTrOLKLC(V TLVC& K(T(KXTirOEvT( KOV TrXELOTOv XX'1AXov TOL(T yEVEoL
6LUE)ppOLV 76T O T(V OLKL'OTGV TOV TTpoor(yopL'(V Xa cpcVOUoLV. KU1 iL 6EL TrEpi U(V
c"XXov aX.eyLV CUI clV y&p toiav ol uyv 'AVuL6XOtLa Kar0OLKO0VTE( 'AvrLoXEdt vomLonCova TcL
Trsv y&p oTrOXLTULcV tahuTO E'6(l)KEV 6 KTLiOTrh T e XEUKO 60io Ai oL Ev 'Eiocr KS L KUrc( trlv
"XXIrv '(oviav TOLT aUUOLyEvEoL TroTX iTLL 6o)VUOUiOLV TOiTO T0rapaoCX6vTv WaVUoi, O ,V
6Lx560Xv. '5 6 t 'PG)4L,)V LXavOp&Urri Tr T&LV ouv tLLKpOu 6eLV G T| U I(,U)V TrTporTyopL(0X
LETUx6E60UKEV O LO6vov Lv6pCoOLV LXXC&L KCL LEya'XOL 'EOveoLV O6XOL "IpT pE yofv oL TrU'XaL
KaCL TupprIvoiL KCCL CapLvoL PUo^C(LOL KCXoVTCaL

("For all who are called to any colony, even if they are greatly separated from one another
in their own race, take their appellative from their founders. And why is it necessary to
speak of others? For the Jews living in Antioch are called Antiochenes, for Seleucus the
founder gave them citizenship, just as the Jews living in Ephesus and the rest of Ionia share
the same name with the native citizens, this granted also to them by the royal successors.
And the benevolence of the Romans has extended still further, that their appellative has
been bestowed not only on men but also on entire great nations, so even those who were
formerly Iberians, and Tyrians, and Sabines are called Romans").5





55 Ap. 2.33.
56 Cf. AJ 12.8, where Josephus claimed that Ptolemy I (Soter) gave the Jews the status of
LooTroXLTEL'2.
57 Ap. 2.38-40.









This was important evidence, for it showed Jews both enjoying and being viewed as regular

members of major Hellenistic cities. Alexandria, Syrian Antioch, and Ephesus were among the

largest and most important Hellenistic cities in Josephus' day, so it was not as if the Jews'

political status was recognized only in backwater towns. Josephus made an emphatic point that

he was not merely citing a political theory (KacL i 6el Trepi T v &XXWv XEYELv). The fact was,

according to Josephus, that in the greatest cities of the Roman world the Jews had been treated

exactly like any other group within Hellenistic culture. Moreover, they bore the same local

names as the natives in the old Greek heartland itself, the western coast of Asia Minor, and he

implies that the Jews were certainly included under the umbrella of "Roman."58 It is the Greek

recognition of Jews, however, that gets the most attention from Josephus. After the statement

quoted above Josephus goes into a short history of benevolent treatment of the Jews by

Alexander III, Ptolemy I (Soter), Ptolemy II (Philadelphus), Ptolemy III (Euergetes), and

Ptolemy VI (Philometor), a history which emphasizes the loyalty and service of the Jews to

Greek rulers of Egypt. The trouble with Cleopatra found the Jews on the side of the Romans, and

Josephus duly noted that this loyalty was attested by both Julius Caesar and Augustus. Again,

both Greeks and Romans had acknowledged the Jews as a significant constituency and ally.59

At Contra Apionem 2.145 Josephus finished his refutation of the criticisms of Apion and

turned to other slanders from other authors, namely Apollonius Molon and Lysimachus, whose

slanders concerned Moses. While he said ou y&p EyKOc4Ltov cTu4(Xv v TrpoELXOidTrv ouyypt4EL





58 Josephus' statement about the Iberians is probably to be taken as a generalization. Not
all communities in Roman Hispania enjoyed Roman citizenship. See T. Mommsen, The
Provinces of the Roman Empire (Chicago 1968) 71. See also n."a" in Thackeray's Loeb
translation, 1:308.
59 Josephus repeats this important fact in Ap. 2.72.









("I do not propose to write an encomium about ourselves"),60 he again turned to Greek models

for comparison. Specifically, Josephus claimed that Moses surpassed the greatest names in Greek

legal history. rlt'i roivuv Tbv ti~TeTpov voLo0eTirlv iTv 6Trou65rl ooTv [V1[rLovEuo[0evodv

votoOeTrTv TrpoUyetLV pXaULOT6lL AuKoipyoL y&p KCaL E6owVE KCL Z&AEUKO0 6 TV v AOKpoV KCL

TriVTE o i OaugcuCt(6o4voL Trap& ToL "EXX)iotILV EXOe 6 KCL TTpdorlv o, Turp6o EKEiVOV

TUapcapcA~ovotL (aCvoVTtL ("Thus I say that our lawgiver surpasses in antiquity all the known

lawgivers anywhere. For Lycurguses and Solons and Zaleucus of the Locrians and all those who

are marveled at by the Greeks have appeared only yesterday or the day before in comparison to

him").61 Similarly, he explicitly compared Moses with Minos: otoL6roX p'tv 6U1 TL [a6&r6] Tl iv

6 voioOQ&irl o0 yO6r1 oi)6' a(TCratUv (TrrEp XoL60opo0vret XEyouoLV &6iKWX UaXX' o ouq vrap&a oti

"EXX)rotL aoxow V6Lv Mivo yeyovivEL KCaL [eT& TraTa Toi( 0(XXou( voTo0e(uao ("such a one

was indeed the kind of person our lawgiver was; not a swindler, nor a cheat, which is the very

thing the revilers unjustly say, but such a one as Minos had been among the Greeks, and the

other lawgivers afterwards"),62 and went on to extol the Jewish legal charter as the best that

could be imagined. What is surprising is that Josephus' description of the Jewish politico-

religious system in the Contra Apionem does not so much follow the contours of the description

in the canonical Biblical account, but follows the one in Hecataeus of Abdera, a Greek author.63

In 2.168 he came even closer to claiming explicitly that the Jews were the source of

Greek wisdom. He says:

MTUTa TrEpi OEO (povELV o'L oocjTaTroL Trap' "EXXrotLv O6L p~v E6L6t&XOioCUv EKELVOU T&(
apXcLX; 1TrapaoX6vTro EG) v6v XyetLV OTL 6' EorL KfXCL KfCL rpiTrV tvra TOUD OEO ()U'OEL KCL
EycUaXLOTi'TL o(66ppa E apTup'lKcOL' KCL y&p IiuIcayo6pc( KCL 'Avaaypc(p KCaL InXrTov oi

60 Ap. 2.147.
61 Ap. 2.154. See pp.248-9 above for Josephus' appropriation of the phrase "yesterday or
the day before" from Greek literature.
62 Ap. 2.161.
63 Droge 137.









TE [ET' EKELVOv &(TO TTr OTO&( ()LXOF6o()OL KC(L [LKPOu 6ELv (TdCavTEc oiUmw aivovTaL TrEpi
Tfl( Toi OEO UoCE T epovTiK6OIT

("I now leave off from saying that the wisest of the Greeks learned these things about God
because they were taught by him [Moses] who provided the principles, for they testify
greatly that they are good and fitting to the nature and majesty of God. For Pythagoras, and
Anaxagoras, and Plato, and those philosophers who came after him from the Stoa, and
nearly all others, exhibited as much, having thought about the nature of God").

Josephus was in a bold mood here. Josephus says he would not make the explicit claim that the

Jews were in fact the source of Greek intellectualism (although his words produce that same

effect), but would allow the evidence to speak for itself. If the Jews had these ideas about God

first, and then the Greeks had similar ones, the implication was that the Jews were the source for

the Greeks. As if he could hold it in no longer, and convinced he has made his case, he finally

said in 2.281: TrproTOL [ev y&p o0L Trap& Tol; "EXXTIrL iLXooo0'oCvT(E TcO [iev 6OKelV TrC& irpLa

6Lt~eUXTT ov Ev 6e TOL TTrpUyaOL Kcd TU () LXoooC(FLV EKELVG) KrXTiKoOOuiOTr0oUv ("The earliest

philosophers among the Greeks, while they seemingly observed their ancestral customs, in their

deeds and in their philosophies they followed him [Moses]"). Josephus seems to have failed to

keep his promise of avoiding encomium, yet he was sharing in a particular apologetic that Jews

had been advancing for nearly 300 years. "In addition to Aristobulus, the Jewish historians

Eupolemus and Artapanus presented Moses and the patriarchs as culture-bringers to the

Egyptians, Babylonians, and Phoenicians, who in turn civilized the Greeks."64 The cue for this

was actually, again, the Greek Hecataeus of Abdera, who had established a paradigm of great

civilizations branching off from Egypt. Droge notes:

Hecataeus had produced a model and, more importantly, had established a relationship
between Egyptians, Greeks, and Jews which would become the standard for nearly three
centuries. Both Josephus' method of cultural comparison and his representation of Judaism
remain in thrall to Hecataeus' ethnographic model. To insist, as he does at the beginning of
his treatise, that the first Greek philosophers were 'disciples' of the Egyptians and
Babylonians, was to say nothing new. ... Whether as native Egyptians or as resident aliens,

64 Droge 128.









the Jews had been linked to a prestigious source which conferred on them an enviable
antiquity and pedigree. In this sense, then, the Jews were called upon to perpetuate their
own myth in the terms in which the Greeks had invented it.65

The result was that not only were the Jews in Josephus' presentation quite Greek in their legal

traditions, but the Greeks turned out to be quite Jewish, and, more importantly, if Droge's

assessment is correct, Josephus was bringing his Greek readers back to a well-established

understanding of Jewish origins that was well-rooted in Greek thought. The malicious versions

of Jewish origins circulated by anti-Judaic writers such as Apion were thus seen to be a

perversion of a Greek story that originally complimented the Jews.

Josephus' defense of Jewish law culminated with another comparison to Athenian and

Spartan traditions. As Josephus had expounded the virtues and excellencies of Jewish law for

Greek readers, he was aware that he had painted a picture that probably seemed too good to be

true, a picture of a nation of people who had the highest philosophical concept of God, who lived

according to the highest moral standards, who found unity in all things that were good, and who

had a long history of faithfulness to their original laws. The problem, of course, was that the

more he elevated Jewish piety, the more it began to sound like a criticism of non-Jews, and that

brought to the fore again the matter of Jewish exclusivity. Josephus' answer was that Plato's high

ideals (which Josephus claims did not reach as high as Jewish ones) evoked the same kind of

criticism. 66 That is, the Jewish religion was comparable to some of the loftiest thoughts in the

Greek philosophical tradition, including the response they both drew. If that were not enough,

Josephus then conceded that some found the Spartans to be the better legal and moral example,

for they long remained faithful to the laws of Lycurgus. Even here, however, the Jews prove to

be the better ones, Josephus argued, because the Spartans abandoned their legal faithfulness


65 Droge 133.
66 Ap. 2.220-35.









when times got tough.67 The Jews, on the other hand, had remained faithful to their law when

they were persecuted (or so Josephus claimed). So again, the Jews had out-Greeked the Greeks

themselves. Josephus was using a rhetorical technique of defending an apparent transgression as

an expression of loyalty to tradition,68 something Greek readers surely would have noticed.

The implicit criticism of pagan religion became explicit in 2.236-249, where Josephus

entered the well-known Greek tradition of criticism of the morality of the ancient gods,

following the oL LOL of Greeks such as Xenophanes of Colophon, Heraclitus of Ephesus, Timon

of Philus, and Greek skepticism in general.69 He defended his attack on Greek religion by

appealing to the Greeks themselves. TL' y&p TuOv Trap& Tot; "E'EXrTOLv Eirr oo4LX EteOau[Cao~ive)V

OUK LTTL[TeTLItKEV KUCL TTOLrITh)V TOL E'(TE(XOlT(UTrOL( KMCL VO[OEtr()V TOiL O A XLOTU 1T ETULOTEU4ieVOL(

iOL OL6UTXj a 660ac Trep'iL E00v k apXf TrotL TrXrlOEoLV EityKtroTrELpav ("For who of those

admired by the Greeks for wisdom did not rebuke the most famous of the poets and the most

trusted of the legislators because they sowed from the beginning such estimates of the gods

among the multitudes?").70 These Tteau1Cao[EvoL are later called oL 4pov'oreL SLaUEpoVTEc ("those

who are superior in thought").71 The point is that if the high character of Judaism came across as

a criticism of Greek religion, this criticism itself was a Hellenic kind of thing because the noblest

among the Greeks themselves criticized their ancestral religion. Thus again the Jews were

standing well within the thought and practice of the noble Greeks of the past.



67 Ap. 2.227.
68 As seen in Aelius Theon, Exercises 8: "Whenever we seek forgiveness we shall have
starting points from the following: first, that the action was unintentional, either through
ignorance of chance or necessity; but if it was intentional, one should say that it was reverent,
that it was customary, that it was useful." In G. Kennedy (trans.), Progymnasmata: Greek
Textbooks of Prose Composition and Rhetoric (Atlanta 2003) 49.
69 Josephus had mentioned this feature of Greek religion briefly before, in AJ 1.22.
70 Ap. 2.239.
71 Ap. 2.242.









Jewish refusal to assimilate to Greek religion was, of course, at the core of the Jewish

social problem. Apion had put his finger on the problem when he asked, concerning the Jews of

Alexandria, quomodo ergo ... si sunt cives, eosdem deos quos Alexandrini non colunt? ("how

then is it ... if they are citizens, that they do not worship the same gods as the Alexandrians?"),72

and the issue was raised again by Apollonius Molon. Interestingly, nowhere did Josephus say

that the practice of Judaism entailed the rejection of the pagan gods,73 and however numerous

proselytes were, Josephus consistently downplayed their presence.74 Instead, Josephus' response

was that it was a mark of piety that Jews remained faithful to the laws which Moses gave them

from God. He argued that what contemporary critics viewed as a fault in the Jews was actually a

virtue when seen in the light of classical Greek practice. Plato, the Spartans, and the ancient

Athenians prized the same attitude toward laws and moral behavior as proved by their treatments

of Socrates, Anaxagoras, Diagoras, and Protagoras.75 If such a virtuous attitude was judged to be

intolerance, then the Greeks themselves were guilty of the same offense. Josephus put forth the

case of Ninus as additional evidence:

Nivov76 yap TV LE'pELaV (TrE.KTELVcV ETrEL TL (X')TTf KUXTiyO6pTr~OV OTL UEVOUV 'lU L 9OEOL
v0oG) 6' ~v TOUTO Trap' UUXTOL( KEKo)XU4Evov KMCL TL[opLa Kar& TV v eov LoayOVTov OE6V
,pLoOTo Ovvatro0 oL 6e TOLOUt VO'[G XP6)iEvoL 65rXov OTTL TOi)b (;) LXXWV OU'K EVOiL(Lov
E VaL 9eo0U o01 yp S&v X~f i LV TOL; T',OV UOTrOXAUaELV 'Oi1oUv

("For they executed Ninus the priestess, since someone accused her, that she lulled people
to the custom of strange gods. This had been forbidden by them, and a punishment of death
had been determined for those who bring in a strange god. Now those who act by such a



72 Ap. 2.65.
73 S. Cohen, 'Crossing the Boundary and Becoming a Jew', HTR 82 (1989) 27.
74 S. Cohen, 'Respect for Judaism by Gentiles', HTR 80 (1987) 427-8. Similarly, C.
Gerber suggests that Josephus' depiction of proselytes in the Ap. is largely a literary device. 'Des
Josephus Apologie fur Judentum', in J. Kalms and F. Siegert (hg.), Internationales Josephus-
Kolloquium Bruissel 1998 (Munster 1998) 265.
75 Ap. 2.255-268.
76 An emendation from viv in the manuscripts.









law make it clear that they do not consider the gods of others to be gods, otherwise they
would not have begrudged themselves to enjoy more gods").77

So again, the Jews were actually like the Greeks in this regard. The Greeks were not an intolerant

people, but were simply zealous to preserve the purity of their religious customs. If that was a

good Greek quality, then the Jews lacked nothing in that regard.

Conclusion

Perceived criticism against the Jews provided Josephus with further opportunities to

construct his Greek ethnicity for the Jewish people. The program that characterized his earlier,

major works continued in his later, minor works. There is less of this collective program

discernible in the Vita because that work concentrated on Josephus himself and not on the Jewish

people as a whole. Even so, Josephus described his own affiliations and conduct in way that

depicted him as an insider who was in touch with Hellenistic culture and politics, and he latently

used Greek standards for historians to portray himself favorably to his readers and to discredit

his detractors.

The collective program of ethnicity-building is more visible in the Contra Apionem, where

broad slanders against the Jews allowed Josephus further opportunities to align Jews with

Greeks. The extent to which Josephus went to achieve this alignment in the Contra Apionem is

paralleled only in the Antiquitates Judaicae,78 and in some ways exceeds it. In the Contra

Apionem Josephus compared the Jews and Greeks by using Greek standards of historiography,79

by citing several famous Greek figures who were acquainted with the Jews (culminating in a

story concerning Aristotle and a Jew), by comparing the misfortunes of both Jews and Greeks,

77 Ap. 2.267-8. She is mentioned in D. Adv. Boeot. 39.2.
78 Spilsbury (348-67) has noted the extensive similarities between the Contra Apionem
and the Antiquitates Judaicae.
79 My own reading has confirmed the view of S. Cohen in this regard, who has noted that
in the Contra Apionem "Josephus attacks the Greeks with their own weapons." S. Cohen,
'History and Historiography in the Against Apion of Josephus', History and Theory 27 (1988) 5.









by using Greek terms to describe Jewish institutions (including one Josephus invented), and by

emphasizing the political status Jews had enjoyed, especially under Greek rulers. He also

managed negative impressions of Jews by reverting to the same theme that characterized the

Antiquitates Judaicae, namely the lofty nature of Jewish piety. Even here, however, the

apologetics were accompanied by comparison with a Greek notion of piety.

The Contra Apionem has a more aggressive presentation of Jewish ethnicity than does

Josephus' other works. This is due to the nature of the work itself and the circumstances which

prompted its origin. Continued anti-Jewish polemics, in spite of Josephus' thoroughly Greek

depiction of them in the Antiquitates Judaicae, called for strong rebuttal. Moreover, it would

seem that Jewish-Roman relations took a downward turn in the reign of Domitian. A shortage of

cash prompted Domitian to collect the Jewish tax with more rigor,80 and the emperor was taking

his deity more seriously all the time, especially against those (like Jews81 and Christians82)

whose religious scruples or philosophical ideas conflicted with acknowledging his divine

status.83 It is possible to see in Josephus' writings a growing sense of apprehension about the

nature of Jewish-Roman relations.84 The significance of this for the present study is that the

deterioration of this relationship would have prompted increased efforts on Josephus' part to

assert a Jewish ethnicity that called for acceptance in the Roman world, and this is exactly what

we see.

However, a note of caution is appropriate here. We should not jump to the conclusion that

Josephus' portrayal of things necessarily reflects the social realities of his day accurately. "It is


80 Suet., Dom. 12.
81 Cf D.C. 67.14, where the philosopher Juventius Celsus was threatened with
banishment and escaped by acknowledging the emperor as "master and god."
82 Cf the New Testament's Apocalypse of John (the Book ofRevelation).
83 Cf D.C. 67.13.
84 Case 10-20.









notoriously unwise to rely on a group's self-description to produce an accurate picture of that

group."'8 This is rhetorical polemic, not objective history. As I have noted, there are several

oddities about Josephus' method in the Contra Apionem. He does not tell us who was

complaining that the Jews were not an ancient culture. He denigrated Greek history when it

appeared to criticize the Jews, but piled up names of Greek historians when he thought he saw in

them references to Jews, and the main charge he set out to refute does not sound like a typical

Greek complaint about foreigners. He was not accurate when he used the Greek historians, and

his use of Greek terms to describe Jewish institutions was dubious. A good case can be made that

Josephus was dealing more with his own perception of anti-Jewish sentiments than with real

ones.86 After all, he began the treatise by mentioning that several people had criticized his

Antiquitates Judaicae. He then took that to be a criticism of Jewish culture and ethnicity

generally. It is not that widespread anti-Jewish perceptions could not have existed. I have argued

above, in chapter three, that the Roman world had its share of anti-Jewish sentiment, and surely

Josephus' perceptions were grounded in his actual social situation. He could not have invented

these objections wholesale, written a book to refute them, and expected people to take the result

seriously. But the Contra Apionem does not necessarily reflect its historical context in a purely

objective way. The fact that Josephus' personal situation compromised his objectivity and

sometimes interfered with his larger purpose will always be a factor in reading his works, and to

insist on deciding between him writing out of personal motives or out of national interests is to

create a false dichotomy. Both played a part, but how to weight them will be a matter of ongoing

debate. For the purposes of this study, however, a stance is not necessary. Ethnicities are not

necessarily driven by the realities of the situations in which they are proposed, but by a perceived


85 Goodman, 'Jews and Judaism in the Mediterranean Diaspora', 182.
86 Gruen, 'Greeks and Jews: Mutual Misperceptions', 39-50.









crisis on the part of those who propose them. Whether the perception accurately reflects the

reality is beside the point. What we see is that the factors that typically motivate people to forge

and promote an ethnicity were in place for Josephus, and the Contra Apionem makes sense when

read in this light.









CHAPTER 8
SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS

The literary works of Flavius Josephus were addressed to non-Jews. This is our first clue

concerning the nature and purpose of these works. Josephus was not engaging in an inside

conversation among Jews over how, or to what extent, Hellenism compromised Jewish religious

principles or Jewish ethnic identity (the two were closely related). He was instead initiating a

dialogue with the larger Roman-Hellenistic world of his day. This dialogue was prompted by a

wide-spread and persistent anti-Jewish sentiment in Hellenistic society, a sentiment that had

originated in Egypt, but by the first century CE had spread to many other places. Diaspora Jews

were often subjected to unfair treatments of various kinds and were the objects of literary

slanders. They were seldom in a position to access the means by which upward social mobility

could have been attained, and they often had their temple contributions confiscated while local

Roman officials either looked on or encouraged it. As a result, they often felt antagonized by

Roman imperium. Their exclusive dedication (which they viewed as the expression of piety) to

their own religion was interpreted as malice towards all others, and those who did not understand

Jewish customs often put a malicious spin on them. More than anything else, the First Jewish

War had ended in a crushing defeat of the Jews that was institutionalized in the political

machinery of the Roman empire and that was used to bolster the image of the Flavian dynasty at

Jewish expense. The Jewish social and cultural image had suffered greatly in Josephus' day.

They had been marginalized and discounted in almost every way.

It is not as if the Jews had deliberately isolated themselves culturally from the rest of the

world. Indeed, they had a long history of Hellenization going back to the Seleucid period in

Palestine. Of course, this was not uniform for Jews everywhere, since Hellenization was not a

uniform phenomenon, nor was Judaism a monolithic social entity. However, in many places and









in many ways the Jews had deliberately assimilated Hellenistic culture. There was a widespread

use of the Greek language on their part, and the evidence suggests that this was not simply due to

the practical exigencies of the day. The LXX was the Bible of most Jews in the first century CE.

They used Greek architectural styles for their public buildings (especially synagogues), and they

were integrated into the work force of the ancient world across the spectrum of usual

occupations. The Greek literature produced by Jewish authors such as Artapanus, Aristobulus,

and Ezekiel the Tragedian, as well as the anonymous authors of the Jewish Sibylline Oracles and

the Letter ofAristeas thoroughly incorporated Greek literary motifs in their works. Even in

southern Palestine, where the presence of the Jerusalem temple offered strong resistance to

Hellenism, Greek culture within Jewish institutions was apparent. Herod the Great had left

public buildings throughout his domain, most of which prominently bore explicit Hellenistic

features. We have argued that the evidence reveals a picture of the Jews not as a people who

found Hellenism imposed on them and who reluctantly tolerated it, but as a people who were

willing to adapt to the social forces around them and who did not see the Hellenization as

inherently consisting in a compromise with their collective identity.

What was the subject of the dialogue Josephus initiated with the Hellenistic world? A close

look at Josephus' literary methods holds an answer: the subject of the dialogue was the Greek

quality of the Jewish people. Throughout his writings Josephus portrayed Jews as sharing in the

qualities and experiences of the noble Greeks of the past. In the Bellum Judaicum, Josephus

recounted the First Jewish War following the Greek models of Herodotus, Thucydides, and

Polybius in particular, but also participating in the conventions of the Greek traditions of

historiography in general. It was "the greatest war ever," it was fought between a superpower

and much smaller nation, people found themselves unwilling participants in it, and its record was









provided by one who fought in the conflict and witnessed much of it firsthand. This mimesis was

not merely a formal exercise meant to be a token gesture toward the conventions of the day.

Instead it lay at the heart of Josephus' narrative and colored almost everything in it, including

Josephus' presentation of himself as an historian after the Greek paradigm. In addition to

adopting the formal elements of the tradition, Josephus also used specific scenes from Greek

history as types for his depiction of the Jews, and he even used elements of the Greek

historiographical tradition when did they not fit well with his own story (as in his use of uuXrlI).

Complementary to this was his suppression of things (like the Jewish sects) that were uniquely

Jewish and recasting them in Greek terms, or the suppression of things that would have reminded

his readers of Roman animosity (as seen in his favorable portrait of Titus). In the Antiquitates

Judaicae, Josephus used an &pxcaLoXoyLc of the past as a vehicle for presenting the essential

agreement between the Jews and the ancient Greeks culturally. The fluid way in which

foundational stories were treated and understood in his day allowed him the flexibility to do this.

Around the central facet of a holy God Josephus told the stories of the Jewish Biblical tradition

in such a way that Jewish piety resembled Greek virtue. He changed the vocabulary of the stories

to echo Greek stories, he used Greek terms to describe Jewish cultural or political institutions

(even though the terms did not always fit), he downplayed or ignored aspects of the stories that

would have seemed especially foreign for a Greek reader, and he labored to establish

connections between the Jews and the Greeks in the past. He presented major figures in Jewish

history like Greek exempla who embodied Hellenistic ideals, he emphasized those episodes in

the tradition where Jews made positive impressions on Greeks, and he manipulated the

presentation of stories that presented the Jews in a bad light, or that presented theological









problems, in order to minimize those aspects of Jewish culture that would have seemed foreign

or hostile to Hellenistic society and to highlight the aspect of Jewish piety or innocence in them.

What was the purpose of the dialogue Josephus initiated with the Hellenistic world? There

were other accounts of the First Jewish War circulating in Josephus' day. The problem was in the

way they depicted the Jews, and Josephus in particular. Similarly, there was already an account

of Jewish history written in Greek (the LXX) for any Gentile who may have wished to know the

facts of that history and the origins of Jewish culture. For Josephus, however, the problem with

the LXX seems to have been that although it was written in the Greek language, it was not Greek

in its spirit or presentation, and its characters did not look like Greeks, not to mention that it was

a collection of fairly disparate materials that lacked literary and linguistic cohesion. That is, the

Jews still looked strange and aloof from the world in that telling of the story. Like those other

accounts of the First Jewish War, the problem with the LXX lay also in the way it depicted the

Jews. Furthermore, the LXX did not extend its history down to the present day, and thus did not

fit the literary expectations of a Greek reader in that regard either. In Josephus' view, the Jews

were suffering socially and culturally under the malicious perceptions of others, and there was

nothing to which Gentiles could turn to see it differently. The customs, the history, and the

version of the war they knew obscured (if not downright perverted), in Josephus' opinion, the

true identity of the Jewish people. Therefore Josephus set out to fill the void, to provide a

presentation of the Jews that showed them in the light in which Hellenistic society ought to see

them.

The point, then, of the Bellum Judaicum was not simply to provide a Jewish account of the

war, but to provide a corrected account of the war that presented the Jews in the proper way. The

other accounts of the war had presented the Jewish people (as a group) as hostile foreigners, but









Josephus wanted them to be viewed as a people who embodied those features that had already

been accepted (even if grudgingly) in the Roman world: those of the ancient Greeks. The Bellum

Judaicum thus showed how closely the Jews had paralleled Greek experience in their own. This

point was made on a larger scale in the Antiquitates Judaicae. Its purpose was not to explain

Jewish culture to Greek readers, for if Josephus simply wanted to explain the various facets of

that history and culture as they appeared in the LXX, he could have done so easily. The problem

with explanation is that while it may address misunderstandings or provide a rationale for what is

mysterious, it leaves its object as what it is. An explanation of foreign customs still leaves the

reader with foreign customs. But the perception of Jews as a people of strange, foreign (and thus

hostile) ways was the problem. More than simple explanation was needed. Thus the purpose of

the Antiquitates Judaicae was to show its intended non-Jewish readership that the essential

features and characters of Jewish culture and history were, for all practical purposes, Greek.

Josephus was re-describing Jewish identity for his readers. Like most Jews, Josephus was able to

feel at home personally in the Hellenistic world, but he perceived that non-Jews did not

reciprocate the feeling. His two major literary productions were an attempt to bridge the gap of

negative perceptions for non-Jews, to show them that they could view the Jews in the same way

they viewed Greeks, because they both had the same qualities. He found the seeds of such a use

of historiography within the Greek tradition already, for Greek historiography had long

contained ethnographic elements.

It has been common in the scholarship on Josephus to refer to his writings as apologetic.

While this description is correct, it does not go far enough. There is more than ordinary

apologetics going on here. The thorough-going nature of his application of Greek models to

Jewish things, resulting in omission of old materials or invention of new elements, shows that









more than defense was involved. Josephus engaged in a re-writing of the traditional materials in

order to present the Jewish people in a different way. The result, while not perfect, would have

been fairly straightforward for his target audience. As they read about the Jews in Josephus'

writings, readers would have come away with the impression that the Jews were remarkably

similar to the ancient Greeks in many ways. The better way to describe this is that Josephus was

constructing an ethnicity for the Jews. "From a 'bird's eye view' the construction of ethnicity is

likely to be manifested as multiple overlapping boundaries constituted by representations of

cultural difference, which are at once transient, but also subject to reproduction and

transformation in the ongoing process of social life."820 This describes succinctly, and exactly,

what Josephus was doing as he applied Greek models to Jewish history.

An ethnicity is a dynamic social construct by which a person, or group, defines themselves

in relation to others out of a basic psychological need for self-esteem. The need for such self-

definition often arises out of a sense of crisis that threatens one's established self-understanding.

The crisis can consist of almost anything, including war or large-scale social forces (such as

Hellenism) that confront a social group in a way that is perceived as threatening. At the heart of

such a construct is a putative myth of shared descent. This myth may be understood literally, as

referring to an actual blood tie, but more often it is construed in other ways. Other elements of an

ethnicity are typically things like a shared history, a distinctive culture, a homeland, and a sense

of community solidarity. Not everything needs to be negotiable, and not everything that is

available for negotiation needs to be negotiable to the same extent, nor does every element of an

ethnicity have to bear equal weight. Some elements, such as claim to a homeland, prove to be

expendable in practice. Many factors will determine the course of an ethnical strategy, such as



820 S. Jones, 'Discourses of Identity in the Interpretation of the Past', 70-1.









the power of religious institutions. The nature and value of any particular ethnic identifier

(whether at the level of criteria or indicia) is determined by the socio-historical context in which

the ethnic dialectic is pursued.

As Josephus undertook his reinvention of Jewish ethnicity, he faced all the limiting factors

that any ethnicity faces. He had to negotiate it in the face of a dominant, "other" culture and its

conservative, resistant institutions. He had to make the end result plausible. In the end, an

ethnicity is a proposal for how a certain people are to be understood in relation to the rest of

society. For that reason, the "success" of an ethnicity is ultimately not determined by the people

who forge it, but by the people who are asked to accept it. Josephus' program of building a new

ethnicity for the Jews, of re-inventing Jewish identity for Gentile readers, proved difficult as

evidenced by the fact that he had to follow up his major literary works with two smaller works,

both of which pressed the ethnic agenda again. The credibility of his portrait of Jewish ethnicity

in the Bellum Judaicum was questioned, mostly because of critics who cast aspersions on his

character, and he responded with the Vita, a defense of his own conduct. Greek readers were also

hesitant to accept his picture of Jewish culture and ethnicity in the Antiquitates Judaicae, and he

responded with the Contra Apionem, in which he zealously pressed his case further.

In his literary works Josephus produced an ethnicity for Jews that was unique in its time in

terms of its scope. However, the verdict of history seems to be that Josephus' proposed ethnicity

for the Jews was rejected by both his own people and the Roman world around them. Quotations

from his works do not appear until the end of the second century, where he is first cited by the

Christian author Theophilus of Antioch.821 Josephus is mentioned by Suetonius (Vesp. 5.6) and

Dio Cassius (65.1), but no pagan author apparently cited Josephus until Porphyry, at the end of


821 In Autol. 3.20-3.









the third century CE,822 and no Jewish author cited him until the Middle Ages.823 It is possible,

but not certain, that Dio Cassius used Josephus as a model.824 Eusebius825 in the fourth century

CE said that copies of Josephus' works had been deposited in a library in Rome, but who put

them there we do not know. Later Christians used Josephus generally for their own theological

purposes (which were often anti-Jewish), but not for understanding Jewish ethnicity. We will

close with a few suggestions about why it did not work.

First, neither the Jews nor the Romans were ready for it.826 The Jews were still feeling the

sting of defeat in war, and the Romans were not done manipulating its value to them. Neither

party was in a position to re-think Jewish identity in such a way that the barriers of the past could

be removed. The Roman literary scene was probably not ready for a Jewish Thucydides either.

The problem was that too many other considerations were in play. As J. Hall notes, "... ethnic

identity can sometimes be a matter of an achieved status which vests itself in the garb of an

ascribed one. This happens where an individual manages successfully to persuade his or her

peers that s/he fulfills the criteria for ethnic inclusion, regardless of any objective

considerations."27 However, the objective considerations were too powerful to overcome at the

time the ethnicity was proposed. The context of Roman imperial power made the successful

prosecution of new ethnicities virtually impossible. J. Yinger notes that "In some developing

states, of course, ethnicity has been accepted as an organizing principle, to some degree because





822 In Abst. 4.11.2-14.2.
823 Droge 141.
824 M. Eisman, 'Dio and Josephus: Parallel Analyses', Latomus 36 (1977) 657-73.
825 H.E. 3.9.2.
826 cf Droge 141: "In the end it was an experiment that failed, or perhaps we should say,
an experiment whose time had not yet come. Not even his coreligionists were persuaded."
827 P.28.









no ethnic group has had sufficient power to declare itself the core."828 The opposite, however,

was true in Josephus' context, and Roman identity politics prevailed over Jewish ethnic myth.

Second, the Romans' cultural patience for the Jews had already been exhausted.829 The

differences between Jews and others were perceived as too great to allow them a place on the

inside. The Romans were generally tolerant toward native cultures and were perfectly willing to

extend citizenship to those who adopted Roman mores.830 However, Josephus' proposals were

too little too late. There were just too many things about the square peg of Jewish culture that

could not fit into the round hole of Hellenistic society. In a sense, Josephus' sense of his own

culture, and his aim topreserve it (even though he was trying to put it in Greek guise), was his

biggest obstacle.

Third, we noted in our chapter on ethnicity that any ethnical strategy must attain some

semblance of credibility if it hopes to succeed. There were many elements of Josephus' ethnicity,

however, that failed at precisely this point. Would any Roman really have believed that a Roman

general like Titus was shocked and moved to tears at the sight of his enemies getting what they

deserved? Would they have believed that the expulsion of Jews from Rome in 19 CE was really

caused only by the actions of four men, and that the emperor would be that unfair? Would any

Greek really have believed that Aristotle learned philosophy from a Jew? Would any

Alexandrian have agreed that the Jews in that city were on an equal political footing with the

Alexandrians themselves? In these and similar other places Josephus was trying too hard and

crossed the line of believability. In others ways as well, the project must have seemed like an

attempt to justify a contradiction. If the Jews really were just like the Greeks in Hellenistic



828 'Ethnicity', AnnualReview of Sociology 11 (1985) 169.
829 Yavetz 15-18.
830 Walbank 155.









society, then why did they not participate in the local cults, or why did they send their money to

Jerusalem instead of investing it in the cities where they lived? In some ways, it must have

appeared as an attempt to integrate without compromise.

Fourth, and related to the third reason, is that in some places Josephus' employment of

Greek paradigms comes across as ham-fisted and unsatisfying. As we have noted above, he

crossed a well-known boundary between history and myth when he compared Moses and Homer.

In his attempt to describe the Jewish governmental system in Greek terms he has Moses, not

God, at the head of the Jewish state. He made the Roman army the tool of the Jewish God, and

he admitted his personal bias up front in the Bellum Judaicum (1.9-12), something no self-

respecting Hellenistic historian would have done.831 It certainly made him look inept and not

worth the reading. There were also important features of the Greek historiographical tradition

that an ancient reader would have noticed were lacking in Josephus' major works. For example,

we noted in our study of Josephus' Bellum Judaicum that change and its causes was a major

theme of the Greek historians, and that a war was one manifestation of it. However, Josephus has

a war, but no change. At the beginning of the story Rome ruled the world, and at the end of the

story the world is still securely under Roman control. Similarly, the theme of change is

completely absent from the Antiquitates Judaicae. Instead it sought to justify Jewish traditional

customs by comparison with Greek ones. But in using historiography in this way, Josephus was

acting against a major element of the convention he was trying so hard to employ. "The Greek

and Roman historians were not supposed to be the keepers of tradition."832

Fifth, Josephus' reputation was apparently a continual obstacle to both groups. His

reputation as a Roman sympathizer generally prevented Jews from accepting his literary works.


831 J. Price, 'The Provincial Historian in Rome', 110-11.
832 Momigliano, 'Tradition and the Classical Historian', 284.









That this was an ongoing problem is evidenced by the fact that he had to write the Vita, in

defense of his character and in response to a fellow-Jew, some fifteen years after the publication

of the Antiquitates Judaicae. The problems with his own reputation may even account for why

the Aramaic version of the Bellum Judaicum did not survive antiquity.833 Josephus' Greek

writings appear to have been completely ignored by the Jews of his day. "Understandably, the

cozier he [Josephus] became with the Romans-the conquerors of the Jews-the more detestable

he became to his people. ... His name does not appear in either version of the voluminous

Talmud, which was finally edited in the fifth and sixth centuries, or in any other early Jewish

writing."834 The fact that Josephus apparently did not maintain contact with Jews in Palestine

after settling in Rome probably did not help matters.835 To the Romans Josephus probably

always appeared as little more than a member, however noble in person,836 of that defeated

people who had caused so much trouble in the recent past. It would be a long time before the

Jews recovered from the black eye received in their defeat in 70 CE. Neither group, then, had

much use for him, and in the end his program for Jewish ethnicity was too simplistic to handle

the complicated nature of the situation it was designed to address.














833 Feldman, 'Flavius Josephus Revisited', 839.
834 Mason, Josephus and the New Testament 25. This is due also in part to the fact that
the rabbis generally avoided references to the war.
835 Moehring 865.
836 Suetonius referred to him as a nobilis captivus (Vesp. 5.6).









REFERENCE LIST


Abizadeh, A. "Ethnicity, Race, and a Possible Humanity." World Order 33 (2001) 23-43.

Alcock, S. "The Heroic Past in a Hellenistic Present." In Hellenistic Constructs: Essays in
Culture, History, and Historiography, edited by P. Cartledge et al, 20-34. Hellenistic
Culture and Society 26, Berkeley: University of California Press 1997.

Alfoldy, G. "Eine Bauinschrift aus dem Colosseum." ZPE 109 (1993) 195-226.

Alston, R. "Philo's 'In Flaccum': Ethnicity and Social Space in Roman Alexandria." G&R 44
(1997) 165-75.

Amaru, B. "Land Theology in Josephus' 'Jewish Antiquities'." JQR 71 (1981) 201-29.

Amir, Y. "Josephus on the Mosaic 'Constitution'." In Politics and Theopolitics in the Bible and
PostbiblicalLiterature, edited by H. Reventlow and Y. Uffenheimer, 13-27. JSOTSuppl.
171, Sheffield: JSOT Press 1994.

--. "Theokratia as a Concept of Political Philosophy." Scripta Classica Israelica 8-9 (1989) 83-
105.

Anderson, B. Imagined Communities: Reflections on the Origin and Spread ofNationalism.
London: Verso 1983.

Applebaum, S. "The Legal Status of the Jewish Communities in the Diaspora." In The Jewish
People in the First Century, edited by S. Safrai et al., 420-63. CRINT 1.1, Philadelphia:
Fortress 1974.

--. "The Social and Economic Status of the Jews in the Diaspora." In The Jewish People in the
First Century, edited by S. Safrai and M. Ster, 701-27. CRINT 1.2, Philadelphia:
Fortress 1976.

Ash, R. "Epic Encounters? Ancient Historical Battle Narratives and the Epic Tradition." In Clio
and the Poets: Augustan Poetry and the Traditions ofAncient Historiography, edited by
D. Levene and D. Nelis, 253-73. Leiden: Brill 2002.

Athanassiadi, P. "Dreams, Theurgy, and Freelance Divination: The Testimony of lamblichus."
JRS 83 (1993) 115-30.

Attridge, H. "Josephus and His Works." In Jewish Writings of the Second Temple Period, edited
by M. Stone, 185-232. CRINT 2.2, Philadelphia: Fortress 1984.

--. The Interpretation of Biblical History in the Antiquitates Judaicae ofFlavius Josephus.
Harvard Dissertations in Religion 7, Missoula: Scholars Press 1976.

Balsdon, J. Romans andAliens. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press 1979.









Bar-Kochva, B. "An Ass in the Jerusalem Temple-The Origins and Development of the
Slander." In Josephus' Contra Apionem: Studies in Its Character and Ciiex\i n ith a
Latin Concordance to the Portion Missing in Greek, edited by L. Feldman and J.
Levison, 310-26. Arbeiten zur Geschichte des Antiken Judentums und des
Urchristentums 34, Leiden: Brill 1996.

--. "The Wisdom of the Jew and the Wisdom of Aristotle." In Internationales Josephus-
Kolloquim Brissel 1998, edited by J. Kalms and F. Siegert, 241-50. Munsteraner
Judaistische Studien 4, Miinster 1999.

Barag, D. "King Herod's Royal Castle at Samaria-Sebaste." PEQ 125 (1993) 4-8.

Barclay, J. "Apologetics in the Jewish Diaspora." In Jews in the Hellenistic Roman Cities, edited
by J. Bartlett, 129-48. London: Routledge 2002.

--. "Josephan Rhetoric in Flavian Rome." In Flavius Josephus andFlavian Rome, edited by J.
Edmondson et al, 315-32. Oxford: Oxford University Press 2005.

--. "The Politics of Contempt: Judaeans and Egyptians in Josephus's Against Apion." In
Negotiating Diaspora: Jewish Strategies in the Roman Empire edited by J. Barclay,
109-27. Library of Second Temple Studies 45, London: Clark 2004.

Barish, D. "The 'Autobiography' of Josephus and the Hypothesis of a Second Edition of His
'Antiquities'." HTR 71 (1978) 61-75.

Barnes, T. "The Sack of the Temple in Josephus and Tacitus." In Flavius Josephus andFlavian
Rome edited by J. Edmondson et al, 129-44. Oxford: Oxford University Press 2005.

Barth, F. Ethnic Groups and Boundaries. Boston: Little, Brown 1969.

Begg, C. "Solomon's Apostasy (1 Kgs. 11,1-13) according to Josephus." JSJ28 (1997) 294-313.

Bell, H. "Anti-Semitism in Alexandria." JRS 31 (1941) 1-18.

Bentley, G. "Ethnicity and Practice." CSSH29 (1987) 24-55.

---. "Response to Yelvington." CSSH 33 (1991) 169-75.

Bentwich, N. Josephus. Philadelphia: Jewish Publication Society of America 1914.

Berlin, A. "Romanization and anti-Romanization in pre-Revolt Galilee." In The First Jewish
Revolt: Archaeology, History, andIdeology, edited by A. Berlin and J. Overman, 57-73.
London: Routledge 2002.

--. "Where was Herod's Temple to Augustus?" BAR 29 (2003) 22-4.

--- and J. Overman. "Introduction." In The First Jewish Revolt: Archaeology, History, and
Ideology, edited by A. Berlin and J. Overman, 1-14. London: Routledge 2002.









Bilde, P. "Contra Apionem 1.28-56: An Essay on Josephus' View of His Own Work in the
Context of Jewish Canon." In Josephus' Contra Apionem: Studies in Its Character and
COuei\ i /th a Latin Concordance to the Portion Missing in Greek, edited by L. Feldman
and J. Levison, 94-114. Arbeiten zur Geschichte des Antiken Judentums und des
Urchristentums 34, Leiden: Brill 1996.

-. Flavius Josephus Between Jerusalem and Rome: His Life, His Works, and Their Importance
JSPSS 2. Sheffield: Sheffield Academic Press 1988.

-. "Main Trends in Modem Josephus Research." Nordisk Judaistik. .,kanihua1vi a Jewish
Studies 8 (1987) 73-105.

-. "The Causes of the Jewish War According to Josephus." JSJ 10 (1979) 179-202.

-. "The Jews in the Diaspora of the Roman Empire." Nordisk Judaistik. .tA,\h/,u/i/i/ri/ t, Jewish
Studies 13 (1992) 103-24.

Bohak, G. "Ethnic Continuity in the Jewish Diaspora in Antiquity." In Jews in the Hellenistic
Roman Cities, edited by J. Bartlett, 175-92. London: Routledge 2002.

Borgen, P. "Philo of Alexandria." In Jewish Writings of the Second Temple Period, edited by M.
Stone, 233-82. CRINT 2.2, Philadelphia: Fortress 1984.

Bowley, J. "Josephus' Use of Greek Sources for Biblical History." In Pursuing the Text, edited
by J. Reeves, 202-15. JSOTSuppl. 184, Sheffield: Sheffield Academic Press 1994.

Braun, M. "The Prophet Who Became a Historian." Listener 56 (1956) 53-7.

Brighton, M. The Sicarii in Josephus' Judean War. PhD Diss. University of California, Irvine
2005.

Bruce, F. "Tacitus on Jewish History." JSS 29 (1984) 33-44.

Bruner, M. Strategies ofRemembrance: The Rhetorical Dimensions ofNational Identity
Construction. Columbia: University of South Carolina Press 2002.

Bichler, A. "La relation de Josephe concemant Alexandre le Grand." Revue des etudesjuives 36
(1898) 1-26.

Bull, R. "Caesarea Maritima: The Search for Herod's City." BAR 8 (1982) 24-41.

Bulloch, A., E. Gruen, A. Long, and A. Stewart, eds, Images andIdeologies: Self-Definition in
the Hellenistic World. Berkeley: University of California Press 1993.

Bury, J. The Ancient Greek Historians. New York: Dover 1958.

Case, S. "Josephus' Anticipation of a Domitianic Persecution." JBL 44 (1925) 10-20.









Champion, C. Cultural Politics in Polybius' Histories. Berkeley: University of California Press
2004.

Chancey, M. Greco-Roman Culture and the Galilee ofJesus. SNTSM 134, Cambridge:
Cambridge University Press 2005.

Chaniotis, A. Die Ve i nage zwischen kretischen Poleis in der hellenistischen Zeit. Heidelberger
ahititli i 1 he Beitrige und epigraphische Studien 24. Stuttgart: Franz Steiner Verlag
1996.

Chapman, H. "Spectacle and Theater in Josephus' Bellum Judaicum." PhD Diss. Stanford
University 1998.

Chilton, B. "Salvific Exile in the Isaiah Targum." In Exile: Old Testament, Jewish, and Christian
Conceptions, edited by J. Scott, 239-47. JSJSuppl. 56, Leiden: Brill 1997.

Clay, D. "An Epicurean Interpretation of Dreams." AJP 101 (1980) 342-65.

Cohen, B. Jewish and Roman Law: A Comparative Study. New York: Jewish Theological
Seminary 1966.

Cohen, N. "Josephus and Scripture: Is Josephus' Treatment of the Scriptural Narrative Similar
Throughout the 'Antiquities I-XI'?" JQR 54 (1964) 311-32.

Cohen, S. "'IOYAAIOE TO FENOE and Related Expressions in Josephus." In Josephus and the
History of the Greco-Roman Period: Essays in Memory of Morton S.mith edited by F.
Parente and J. Sievers, 23-38. Studia Post-Biblica 41, Leiden: Brill 1994.

-. "Alexander the Great and Jaddus the High Priest According to Josephus." AJS Review 7
(1982) 41-68.

-. "Crossing the Boundary and Becoming a Jew." HTR 82 (1989) 13-33.

-. "History and Historiography in the Against Apion of Josephus." History and Theory 27/4
(1988) 1-11.

-. Josephus in Galilee and Rome: His Vita and Development as a Historian. Boston: Brill 2002.

-. "Josephus, Jeremiah, and Polybius." HT21 (1982) 366-81.

-. "Religion, Ethnicity, and 'Hellenism' in the Emergence of Jewish Identity in Maccabean
Palestine." In Religion and Religious Practice in the Seleucid Kingdom, edited by P.
Bilde et al, 204-23. Studies in Hellenistic Civilization 1, Aarhus: Aarhus University Press
1990.

-. "Respect for Judaism by Gentiles According to Josephus." HTR 80 (1987) 409-30.

-. The Beginnings of Jewishness. Berkeley: University of California Press 1999.









Collins, J. "Anti-Semitism in Antiquity? The Case of Alexandria." In Ancient Judaism in Its
Hellenistic Context, edited by C. Bakhos, 9-30. Suppl.JSJ 95, Leiden: Brill 2005.

--. Between Aithen and Jerusalem: Jewish Identity in the Hellenistic Diaspora. 2nd ed. Biblical
Resource Series. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans 2000.

--. "Cult and Culture: The Limits of Hellenization in Judea." In Hellenism in the Land ofIsrael,
edited by J. Collins and G. Sterling, 38-61. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press
2001.

Collomp, P. "Der Platz des Josephus in der Technike der hellenistischen Geschichtsschreibung."
In Zur Josephus-Forschung, edited by A. Schalit, 278-93. Wege der Forshung 84,
Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft 1973.

Cotton, H., and W. Eck, "Josephus' Roman Audience: Josephus and the Roman Elites." In
Flavius Josephus andFlavian Rome, edited by J. Edmondson et al, 37-52. Oxford:
Oxford University Press 2005.

Daniel, J. "Anti-Semitism in the Hellenistic Roman Period." JBL 98 (1979) 45-65.

---. Apologetics in Josephus. Ph.D.Diss. Rutgers University 1981.

Damschen, G. "Lysimachos [6]." In Der neue Pauly. Enzyklopadie der Antike, edited by H.
Cancik and H. Schneider, 7.608. Das klassische Altertum und seine
Rezeptionsgeschichte, Stuttgart: J.B. Metzler 2003.

Daube, D. "Rabbinic Methods and Interpretation and Hellenistic Rhetoric." HUCA 22 (1949)
239-64.

Destinon, J von. Die Quellen des Flavius Josephus in derJiddische Archaeologie, Buch xii-xvii- Juid. KriegBuch I Kiel:
Lipsius and Tischer 1882.

Droge, A. "Josephus Between Greeks and Barbarians." In Josephus' Contra Apionem: Studies in
Its Character and Cneiwi\ i /th a Latin Concordance to the Portion Missing in Greek,
edited by L. Feldman and J. Levison, 115-42. Arbeiten zur Geschichte des Antiken
Judentums und des Urchristentums 34, Leiden: Brill 1996.

Droysen, J. Geschichte des Hellenismus. 2 aufl. Gotha: F. A. Pethes 1877-78.

Druner, H. Untersuchungen fiber Josephus. Marburg 1896.

Eckstein, A. "Josephus and Polybius: A Reconsideration." CA 9 (1990) 175-208.

Edwards, D. "Religion, Power and Politics: Jewish Defeats by the Romans in Iconography and
Josephus." In Diaspora Jews and Judaism: Essays in Honor of and in Dialogue i /h,
Thomas A. Kraabel, edited by J. Overman and R. MacLennan, 293-310. Atlanta: Scholars
Press 1992.









Eisman, M. "Dio and Josephus: Parallel Analyses." Latomus 36 (1977) 657-73.

Elliot, N "'The Patience of the Jews': Strategies of Resistance and Accommodation to Imperial
Cultures." In Pauline Conversations in Context: Essays in Honor of Calvin J. Roetzel,
edited by J. Anderson et al. 32-41. JSNTSuppl. 221, London: Sheffield Academic Press
2002.

Farmer, W. Maccabees, Zealots, and Josephus: An Enquiry into Jewish Nationalism in the
Greco-Roman Period. New York: Columbia University Press 1956.

Fearon, J., and D. Laitin. "Violence and the Social Construction of Ethnic Identity."
International Organization 54 (2000) 845-77.

Feldman, L. "Abraham the Greek Philosopher in Josephus." TPAPA 99 (1968) 143-56.

--. "Financing the Colosseum." BAR 27 (2001) 20-31, 60-1.

--. "Flavius Josephus Revisited: The Man, his Writings, and his Significance." In ANRWII.21.2,
763-862. New York: de Gruyter 1984.

--. "Hellenizations in Josephus' Jewish Antiquities: The Portrait of Abraham." In Josephus,
Judaism, and Christianity, edited by L. Feldman and G. Hata, 133-53. Detroit: Wayne
State University Press 1987.

--. "Hengel's Judaism and Hellenism in Retrospect." JBL 96 (1977) 371-82.

--. "How Much Hellenism in the Land of Israel?" JSJ33 (2002) 290-313.

--. Jew and Gentile in the Ancient World. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1993.

--. Josephus and Modern Scholarship. Berlin: de Gruyter, 1984.

--. "Josephus as a Biblical Interpreter: The "Aqedah'." JQR 75 (1985) 212-52.

--. Josephus' Interpretation of the Bible. Hellenistic Culture and Society 27, Berkeley:
University of California Press 1998.

--. "Josephus' Moses and Plutarch's Lycurgus." In Flavius Josephus andFlavian Rome, edited
by J. Edmondson et al, 209-242. Oxford: Oxford University Press 2005.

--. "Josephus' Portrait of Jacob." JQR 79 (1988) 101-51.

--. "Josephus' Portrait of Joseph." RB 99 (1992) 379-417, 504-28.

--. "Josephus' Portrait of Moses. Part Three." JQR 83 (1993) 301-30.

--. Judean Antiquities 1-4: Translation and Commentary. Leiden: Brill 2000.









--. "Rearrangement of Pentateuchal Narrative Material in Josephus' Antiquities, Books 1-4."
Hebrew Union College Annual 70-71 (1999-2000) 129-51.

--. Studies in Josephus' Rewritten Bible. Suppl.JSJ 58, Atlanta: Society of Biblical Literature
1998.

--. "The Concept of Exile in Josephus." In Exile: Old Testament, Jewish, and Christian
Conceptions, edited by J. Scott, 145-72. Suppl.JSJ 56, Leiden: Brill 1997.

Finegan, J. Handbook of Biblical Chronology. Revised edition. Peabody: Hendrickson 1998.

Finkelberg, M. "Virtue and Circumstances: On the City-state Concept of Arete." AJP 123 (2002)
35-49.

Finley, M. I. "Myth, Memory, and History." History and Theory 4 (1965) 281-302.

Fischer, J. "The Term DESPOTES in Josephus." JQR 49 (1958) 132-8.

Fitzmyer, J. "Languages of Palestine in the First Century A.D." Catholic Biblical Quarterly 32
(1970) 501-31.

Fitzpatrick-McKinley, A. "Synagogue Communities in the Graeco-Roman Cities." In Jews in the
Hellenistic andRoman Cities, edited by J. Barlett, 55-87. London: Routledge 2002.

Foakes-Jackson, F. J. Josephus and the Jews: The Religion and History of the Jews as Explained
by Flavius Josephus. 1930. Grand Rapids: Baker 1977.

Foerster, G. "Art and Architecture in Palestine." In The Jewish People in the First Century,
edited by S. Safrai and M. Stem, 971-1006. CRINT 1.2, Philadelphia: Fortress 1976.

Fomara, C. The Nature of History in Ancient Greece and Rome. Berkeley: University of
California Press 1983.

Frede, M. "Chaeremon der Stoiker." In ANRW2.36.3, 2067-103. New York: de Gruyter 1989.

Friedman, J. Culturalldentity and GlobalProcess. London: Sage Publications, 1994.

--. "Notes on Culture and Identity in Imperial Worlds." In Religion andReligious Practice in
the SeleucidKingdom, edited by P. Bilde et al, 14-39. Studies in Hellenistic Civilization
1, Aarhus: Aarhus University Press 1990.

Gabba, E. "The Growth of Anti-Judaism or the Greek Attitude Toward the Jews." In The
Cambridge History ofJudaism vol. 2: The Hellenistic Age, edited by W. Davies and L.
Finkelstein, 614-56. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 1989.

Gager, J. "Jews, Gentiles, and Synagogues in the Book of Acts." HTR 79 (1986) 91-9.









Gerber, C. "Des Josephus Apologie fur das Judentum. Prolegomena zu einer Interpretation von C
2:145ff" In Internationales Josephus-Kolloquium Brissel 1997, edited by F. Siegert and
J. Kalms, 251-69. Muensteraner Judaistische Studien 4, Minster 1999.

Giovannini, A. "Greek Cities and Greek Commonwealth." In Images andIdeologies: Self-
definition in the Hellenistic World, edited by A. Bulloch et al, 265-86. Berkeley:
University of California Press 1993.

Glazier, N., and D. Moynihan. Ethnicity: Theory and Experience. Cambridge: Harvard
University Press 1975.

Goldstein, J. "Jewish Acceptance and Rejection of Hellenism." In Jewish and Christian Self-
Definition Volume 2, edited by E. Sanders, 64-87. Philadelphia: Fortress 1981.

Goodman, M. "Jews and Judaism in the Mediterranean Diaspora in the Late-Roman Period: The
Limitations of Evidence." In Ancient Judaism in Its Hellenistic Context, edited by C.
Bakhos, 177-204. Suppl.JSJ 95, Leiden: Brill 2005.

--. "Josephus as Roman Citizen." In Josephus and the History of the Greco-Roman Period:
Essays in Memory of Morton S.mith, edited by F. Parente and J. Sievers, 329-38. Studia
Post-Biblica 41, Leiden: Brill 1994.

Goudriaan, K. "Ethnical Strategies in Graeco-Roman Egypt." In Ethnicity in Hellenistic Egypt,
edited by P. Bilde et al, 74-99. Studies in Hellenistic Civilization 3, Aarhus: Aarhus
University Press 1992.

Grabbe, L. "The Hellenistic City of Jerusalem." In Jews in the Hellenistic andRoman Cities,
edited by J. Barlett, 6-21. London: Routledge 2002.

--. "The Jews and Hellenization: Hengel and His Critics." Ioudaios 15 May 2006
.

Grant, M. Greek and Roman Historians. London: Routledge 1995.

Green, P. Alexander to Actium: The Historical Evolution of the Hellenistic Age. Hellenistic
Culture and Society 1. Berkeley: University of California Press 1990.

Gruen, E. "Cultural Fictions and Cultural Identity." TAPA 123 (1993) 1-14.

--. Culture and National Identity in Republican Rome. Ithaca: Cornell University Press 1992.

--. Diaspora: Jews Amidst Greeks and Romans. Cambridge: Harvard University Press 2002.

--. "Greeks and Jews: Mutual Misperceptions in Josephus' Contra Apionem." In Ancient
Judaism in Its Hellenistic Context, edited by C. Bakhos, 31-52. Suppl.JSJ 95, Leiden:
Brill 2005.









--. "Hellenism and Persecution: Antiochus IV and the Jews." In Hellenistic History and Culture,
edited by P. Green, 239-73. Berkeley: University of California Press 1993.

--. Heritage and Hellenism: The Reinvention of Jewish Tradition. Berkeley: University of
California Press 1998.

--. "Fact and Fiction: Jewish Legends in a Hellenistic Context." In Hellenistic Constructs:
Essays in Culture, History, and Historiography edited by P. Cartledge et al., 72-88.
Hellenistic Culture and Society 26, Berkeley: University of California Press 1997.

--. "Roman Perspectives on the Jews in the Age of the Great Revolt." In The First Jewish
Revolt: Archaeology, History, andIdeology, edited by A. Berlin and J. Overman, 27-42.
London: Routledge 2002.

--. The Hellenistic World and the Coming ofRome. Berkeley: University of California Press
1986.

Guite, H. "Cicero's Attitude to the Greeks." G&R 9 (1962) 142-59.

Hall, J. Ethnic Identity in Greek Antiquity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 1997.

Hall, R. "Josephus, Contra Apionem and Historical Inquiry in the Roman Rhetorical Schools." In
Josephus' Contra Apionem: Studies in Its Character and Cniie\i n ith a Latin
Concordance to the Portion Missing in Greek, edited by L. Feldman and J. Levison, 229-
49. Arbeiten zur Geschichte des Antiken Judentums und des Urchristentums 34,