<%BANNER%>

Tissue culture of Trifolium polymorphum, T. carolinianum, Adesmia latifolia, A. bicolor and Lotononis bainesii

University of Florida Institutional Repository
xml version 1.0 encoding UTF-8
REPORT xmlns http:www.fcla.edudlsmddaitss xmlns:xsi http:www.w3.org2001XMLSchema-instance xsi:schemaLocation http:www.fcla.edudlsmddaitssdaitssReport.xsd
INGEST IEID E20101204_AAAAEH INGEST_TIME 2010-12-05T00:35:10Z PACKAGE UFE0017881_00001
AGREEMENT_INFO ACCOUNT UF PROJECT UFDC
FILES
FILE SIZE 1053954 DFID F20101204_AACOTH ORIGIN DEPOSITOR PATH vidoz_m_Page_028.tif GLOBAL false PRESERVATION BIT MESSAGE_DIGEST ALGORITHM MD5
3c33c050f0aa25fdbc16db31d6db9576
SHA-1
01f363421c638446dbb9b8a4ee49dd85e3177228
F20101204_AACOSS vidoz_m_Page_013.tif
1d6e688727f84e069432fb85f6433466
f1d763be213663beeb6356b105b7ed769c5624dc
F20101204_AACOTI vidoz_m_Page_029.tif
d162b4e356a81c1153de766ea0b7e980
0d0151202e1eaf6031b5929a4519be9f39d3392c
F20101204_AACOST vidoz_m_Page_014.tif
bc16c822d08698241fb11dfb498167f4
c87565f4ad46d24aa2a01d59bc3658eaced70202
F20101204_AACOTJ vidoz_m_Page_030.tif
3b34e04f33a8a9b58a492476c8303644
4f187cc100b32799b5de11a8951e0f8878e35f6b
F20101204_AACOSU vidoz_m_Page_015.tif
bfa4c9b9c5060f89523afec8d6bc76ff
3607452f713255956b434ef5c3a3e892d5969d42
F20101204_AACOTK vidoz_m_Page_031.tif
6fb4a54691ece5a05ede37647738677a
b1afb94accb51da76cf9bea0a04ff9e63bfba2c4
F20101204_AACOSV vidoz_m_Page_016.tif
a7fe7f1363b71d385dd166e161836bcc
6cb0fc575b27faa9a2f414178f17f1fe41e3b41d
F20101204_AACOTL vidoz_m_Page_032.tif
5d04e84988b47620c4964fbfd928d253
8d1a0eafbd3166b12390b3bfa1f19cb128733f09
F20101204_AACOSW vidoz_m_Page_017.tif
68c35d28d5c51ad42097a2c08cf0cb34
8fb73263cdbec15f5f154d2860b67e7e8e00cfdb
F20101204_AACOUA vidoz_m_Page_047.tif
35933441767a0929923a528ccf8ea2ac
2f02906612f84529b2eb246dc9b932039ecfb967
F20101204_AACOTM vidoz_m_Page_033.tif
579dd3260b7e4ce0355a488a218fd02c
11dff77dc1ed80592c31c050509baf0c6286bd8e
F20101204_AACOSX vidoz_m_Page_018.tif
dab3b3cf4ecdded4996c3f01191f4e47
40b000625f3c8181f26ab10ac2842adbc4b6e7bf
F20101204_AACOUB vidoz_m_Page_048.tif
9ed277edfd49f4f366f954aab05d5a5e
8b2235e9a3b10611cef9a49458683ee596db8847
F20101204_AACOTN vidoz_m_Page_034.tif
5650d7fa99a98e63b8e107780784cded
bb13ae26cf6c88933ecceaeb5c18d0958bf12ab9
F20101204_AACOSY vidoz_m_Page_019.tif
e47fa7f6adeffd863e6f80f3f3b9b329
07ea8d9dcd0594b14b28d206084d16b50542a74b
F20101204_AACOUC vidoz_m_Page_049.tif
a142d0e72a11ab88e9424f9fd5b6344f
819c0775cc75243a8ee42032cf40b4d9d3fa7a6d
F20101204_AACOTO vidoz_m_Page_035.tif
46b8e3c5e3cbd7f84a0b5b4f1ae5b210
2b89edbb1aa0c8b1daf3dac959adfe09ed17c722
F20101204_AACOSZ vidoz_m_Page_020.tif
e1ca29408b6d55f20b2ee156638372f1
aa87ded56aeb5198363b9d162fcccd3debde511a
F20101204_AACOUD vidoz_m_Page_050.tif
2ab3e9516a95db5e847c22e47997c45a
8c72a3d0586c7a3c006a13f9b025f87a95019948
F20101204_AACOTP vidoz_m_Page_036.tif
a4a46aa37ba43e39d4eeb7929fe31c00
1697e681351f91f3f7a2aca49eff98a4190d857a
F20101204_AACOUE vidoz_m_Page_051.tif
9e11189854f51a42d086956fd9f7df14
0b9dc81d30ffdf7caa5ee0a9648a781ed1b54069
F20101204_AACOUF vidoz_m_Page_052.tif
cd65915be778f19ea2fefc4ac50c976e
a982e1d96577518b7d3e06b9bce5e040a3cde6fe
F20101204_AACOTQ vidoz_m_Page_037.tif
46472b3f01ccde136b526a9c94e91389
48b0e5a8b5ade520e630297e6b92be6412931662
F20101204_AACOUG vidoz_m_Page_053.tif
19c150c74943aaa04bf5de229b9f402b
b4b058453c625bca96e8026a9d32342ab661d7fe
F20101204_AACOTR vidoz_m_Page_038.tif
f5d1ae775a26ab5e8231147733f725fa
7963b5c876f2b29da3a60f6bba4b507bf9e6e53b
14072 F20101204_AACPAA vidoz_m_Page_097.pro
53e979d96f5a497a8f9dfc928b9b748c
3f1ff5436b08669a57aab1a1e5e6c368b2baaf7c
F20101204_AACOUH vidoz_m_Page_054.tif
dc37e884b7575edcb9310147e615d1a7
42ef89c1e05714bfa620734b758a141bd57e79d4
F20101204_AACOTS vidoz_m_Page_039.tif
64a41364bab7aae1d151fdf2138c8f0e
ae8117127c3aa596a67ff14a376733362e4a64f2
6354 F20101204_AACPAB vidoz_m_Page_098.pro
c134badf717077371f1adee0d5e14c49
80eed3c115a024d239edfe5a16a5784924356503
F20101204_AACOUI vidoz_m_Page_055.tif
41323164fae4c495a20e16b353f93291
4dd874e2cd2ac88e63a476ab8e0dee54d7de057a
F20101204_AACOTT vidoz_m_Page_040.tif
0eb81601d170ca582649165cb43f26ed
ea09005a82bc2c9b1b2b9fcd4b70eb7e0fd61d5a
52114 F20101204_AACPAC vidoz_m_Page_099.pro
69ef31d6f1960148b476b107c5015787
9fe6ccd1164b0f2083e4f3a2387cfb2797d9c435
F20101204_AACOUJ vidoz_m_Page_056.tif
7a0b4dd668e2dea1769ed5735e08277b
13c89183df4d5b706ed5447776e64f1f5261d459
F20101204_AACOTU vidoz_m_Page_041.tif
43b6a4c4641c4b234c5b486717fec280
f34f813dcbcc70369a48deaef9ea7bf2137a4817
67458 F20101204_AACPAD vidoz_m_Page_100.pro
f8d1fcac600d40676c2e04ecc4eaf16c
cfd09e735686b2b1be570a44f990946ebe0f8a94
F20101204_AACOUK vidoz_m_Page_057.tif
24f3846c1e2b624b7bdc005f5316a766
2a3717ba3b20f96bb4b77a963a8936fe2ceb9163
F20101204_AACOTV vidoz_m_Page_042.tif
97028359e9f4428ce146d3fb2bc955a0
ed21dfae6f352c4e718d9608d030a35b554a99da
58806 F20101204_AACPAE vidoz_m_Page_101.pro
c2130fc19893081ca47da5df99d726e6
9f9fee59fa3810c1533c23194590e31784139546
F20101204_AACOUL vidoz_m_Page_058.tif
63ca7f1ce6f54733d7cbd1d36445e1a2
f89c662451a09162008b386f07f31236711e0f6e
25271604 F20101204_AACOTW vidoz_m_Page_043.tif
377e3a0d73fc815fd18031a6f064f6f4
929fe7fde75fa48decc95e4b0142ac87fd4d7698
57803 F20101204_AACPAF vidoz_m_Page_102.pro
12d73d43ca77c1019743ed0c5437e62c
95790d69a74f3c68b9709418c86bdbe6d86ef3f5
F20101204_AACOUM vidoz_m_Page_059.tif
40ea90555fedb8a821f502a1f11e0d5f
fe31c01facae2cdf90d3095e8002de055d2f1c2d
F20101204_AACOTX vidoz_m_Page_044.tif
a3a278183b010a5f51e1c3392618541f
00fcd841ca76cf92825777c456d58c592aa59893
65617 F20101204_AACPAG vidoz_m_Page_103.pro
90a45b2742cf28535cb62e031b6addf5
311d28651c3d2288397eeb947bef4845c3001c56
F20101204_AACOVA vidoz_m_Page_073.tif
d1b2a56a8ad9c173b2d4aff0f9e5db8c
201f74cbafa3d5de41337d46be2999fac82ab84f
F20101204_AACOUN vidoz_m_Page_060.tif
e04096333ce897ef514af9da801e7566
24fec975e5ea18a281f7805ee4c9c40f8e80b170
F20101204_AACOTY vidoz_m_Page_045.tif
0b8bb36535db3e3f0be0fb1ae2b22dee
94be37b797f3ad34be5173fa9cedfbbbfcf204d0
59485 F20101204_AACPAH vidoz_m_Page_104.pro
5f392f9c32bbd9f28a5f5ddfbc07fad6
6339a6e8ad4ac44d0dc2008cab17489aafb9ba08
F20101204_AACOVB vidoz_m_Page_074.tif
af5f00e09c122abff13cae2c06b430e0
61c4f250800881fe1181bcee9b0c981d6cc0dd42
F20101204_AACOUO vidoz_m_Page_061.tif
e53afeda5396f77bc9bf7d2a3177f6b5
7b318940b4565e5b6da4baa3c2f2bbd1b2a08475
F20101204_AACOTZ vidoz_m_Page_046.tif
7b4cf39500f141cf7502ceb6e2930a52
e3b3c9310b348443106a838d185169f6bdb796ed
59825 F20101204_AACPAI vidoz_m_Page_105.pro
482015db0c6d9898f7bd0569b8a87df9
ecfea8b11c321e99f1e55d4bae00908d77b061d9
F20101204_AACOVC vidoz_m_Page_075.tif
4e9100953eb7c790236b755be962c9bd
65ef2a75a7f593c5d3c5f356329eebd2dee14c22
F20101204_AACOUP vidoz_m_Page_062.tif
d7c55c1072e0b125f7a0d2b4a85f8050
a78809605bf596a16aca807bf79f6a11aa43b68b
60861 F20101204_AACPAJ vidoz_m_Page_106.pro
8f8f34344d77339f61ff92d495fdf2c2
f327be02118329b5a39c3cf7d6c182bd14869171
F20101204_AACOVD vidoz_m_Page_076.tif
31749c0164539498c9fe7a398fe1c905
5ce3b3f7c720d0e178fa95eb91aa9180544aa7ba
F20101204_AACOUQ vidoz_m_Page_063.tif
8ec27c0889fbe3e9770ecfeba9dc5340
d158ec18ac56f812a2c3573d61c024b850ad0a8f
3192 F20101204_AACPAK vidoz_m_Page_107.pro
97bb7b1714901645d633ef9f0b478c37
815cf46fd3ccc51349921af32acab9edd43cb07a
F20101204_AACOVE vidoz_m_Page_077.tif
a7f6ae33f4ff007e6a415729af72afd9
48b23c8b0e2ae937c0c460240fd7321f12644501
24265 F20101204_AACPAL vidoz_m_Page_108.pro
91ab4920ad420efe7755d30ccaf2e386
9ec3f154d0cc184c23d8f3541ac1dcc295fa94a8
F20101204_AACOVF vidoz_m_Page_078.tif
767d4f76401f98319ef6a27a01ba7199
ef7373cc03ac90c3f03b876b9556535568b4fd66
F20101204_AACOUR vidoz_m_Page_064.tif
eb0df1369b8580876ac39a7d23ced029
4610f7b79229b4ee3ae08d672eb8e3f512b3aca2
1922 F20101204_AACPBA vidoz_m_Page_016.txt
d33e9f8c1ed63bb096d4585d673fe091
608d95dab169922f24a69a0894438a0f9481ea2b
504 F20101204_AACPAM vidoz_m_Page_001.txt
6827980f98c4babbe9bcb0c5a69ddb18
78933b3de2126ff5a8f15937d52f3e824fec42af
F20101204_AACOVG vidoz_m_Page_079.tif
b25160e049e818e87d76e7a82c249687
45ecd6c4389ef52f48926f2607a9a86f57db73a3
F20101204_AACOUS vidoz_m_Page_065.tif
257d1475f1ea7ea762a7d7cc8a00c376
de176b13f71ee3a9cc6e2bb9b35eb89d974c601c
1447 F20101204_AACPBB vidoz_m_Page_017.txt
bd2fd381c8ece631d4b44dd07bd2fc20
e7ef5207217fc52a2506239ddc8427121e4d4ef1
113 F20101204_AACPAN vidoz_m_Page_002.txt
8ab5cbd798bed15c768507fc0a7c222b
868e38600ed1e050941a9051a2d822e2123e6d91
F20101204_AACOVH vidoz_m_Page_080.tif
af3c2f6b577262312cf40f12dd6e0380
3130078399ad2486d82d8cfa144c76d95e5be1ca
F20101204_AACOUT vidoz_m_Page_066.tif
e42b3d1bb968bfe9109c2e9e79d7bf35
335013ecff301726fcb180c7b4c46453c8dc68a1
1833 F20101204_AACPBC vidoz_m_Page_018.txt
d4c7317855b52c26a059f4a34c200de4
f5fa110163e79891bfa369d4b44fb6caab1e0648
123 F20101204_AACPAO vidoz_m_Page_003.txt
7bce66395fc2146c1da24bdc55a1f0b9
42ac362835cb750533477450dd10e5c84230e0a8
F20101204_AACOVI vidoz_m_Page_081.tif
93fc59e0f2b2cd0f7d73e7f31a653efb
03ebe896ae50d1a1c841ccffae7a23212ddc2004
F20101204_AACOUU vidoz_m_Page_067.tif
08da697a7c46ffad3ca40e83b691f45c
077e2561577e32e65bc8df5521e872468315a60a
1962 F20101204_AACPBD vidoz_m_Page_019.txt
2b0f8f92b69c82e0a30cbb8b4986740a
7e544a03fa99167abe404ae8b0c9a71906c39ec1
1445 F20101204_AACPAP vidoz_m_Page_004.txt
cb7b8871a26fb3e83de7fe19b516c273
70c178d19d2501f0593d5134bd5344a2185de2aa
F20101204_AACOVJ vidoz_m_Page_082.tif
f691d9be707b20a82473a2057f1b2d76
88d79fdfde14d9a27aa0f9278bc6431d8cb7ff18
F20101204_AACOUV vidoz_m_Page_068.tif
11b0f3bc218822c2da183a75967fa13c
8282c0c445885c8963aa6c95f9819d4bf851db74
1989 F20101204_AACPBE vidoz_m_Page_020.txt
bd25f4741391121270da5a34fe6e5c5f
a13aef090f6de6409cbf7d87d397a43f0ca6d474
2552 F20101204_AACPAQ vidoz_m_Page_005.txt
1834f00fb80f057191fbfe00f100bea9
8bf26349c0421a50c8acd92ff1140dcafdffc554
F20101204_AACOVK vidoz_m_Page_083.tif
e4709ca94264bc2c012d75fb2ef94d27
7967add1953d1f40c6cac07b06ea6f7d2d1a3f54
2014 F20101204_AACPBF vidoz_m_Page_021.txt
a8c1b6282db1978abf25037b69854446
3565b92eb0d4894ada020df5436f8b4006565156
2842 F20101204_AACPAR vidoz_m_Page_006.txt
2167a890944c9a8cfe731f3e962f7ecb
5ef01c193256b51e1eead4ba30dec206677efa81
F20101204_AACOVL vidoz_m_Page_084.tif
13748550bbd282993c0f296999136690
4c6f278b5a9dc4686cf101a3774a98436c98ddb3
F20101204_AACOUW vidoz_m_Page_069.tif
e77537766065c4baa6fdf53ca2508ac0
cc8c924efcad74c0321b5d60e3380ca29700adf2
2104 F20101204_AACPBG vidoz_m_Page_022.txt
e2e26e6014f07f6ce55b4d5f8199e7bf
1b16b1e9599f4d024b3d25d3fe8425b4be8fb289
F20101204_AACOWA vidoz_m_Page_099.tif
9041038957ae694fc1f9a3642f3f96f0
acb540ac0a00d744d429a4f1ad1420d1eebfa9f5
2650 F20101204_AACPAS vidoz_m_Page_007.txt
5d38b1b3810b2f7e9446ec5c55490646
46a4ce61258b273915ac453937ea799a0c43dd40
F20101204_AACOVM vidoz_m_Page_085.tif
83372221c74f2793a5bba37ef5ee05d1
45e15638447fbea9946bdc727cdfe1d0ebd53ba0
F20101204_AACOUX vidoz_m_Page_070.tif
7a13df27abcfe86735f879ec101ba6a7
4e89f1704afec2073db4e3dfca5accced76bebb3
2083 F20101204_AACPBH vidoz_m_Page_023.txt
d778090eb6ea5700c659fffa14376fc9
366452d231cbd6ecbf4a292209a0fd8b57956600
F20101204_AACOWB vidoz_m_Page_100.tif
3b96cdea2ebdbb0d01cfeeb9ebb4d5c6
d66770c245a91a958359ff3d85df57f69cb22af6
3174 F20101204_AACPAT vidoz_m_Page_008.txt
6ff9ea32aa54d63a4372e186dc80bc8e
3826ed5f170100ec1ea0e1ad127142cdab3e028e
F20101204_AACOVN vidoz_m_Page_086.tif
dd7535f17ffcc59e62fdace2fb3767bc
7fc37385dc6f82d3864453f0431b49cf66638111
F20101204_AACOUY vidoz_m_Page_071.tif
12dfe9328b0f8c142c63b56b24332b30
ba31c85364e697769c127b2f9ac92f80d1f95063
1923 F20101204_AACPBI vidoz_m_Page_024.txt
7c7ca3b430a913b5e05d6acf629f014b
72eac0489f647fea8279c536dcefa7af8b38e676
F20101204_AACOWC vidoz_m_Page_101.tif
caab07c83710799f0c5f757766680cf5
740997f693dc2af8e19955bc9d4e2971647afd0d
547 F20101204_AACPAU vidoz_m_Page_009.txt
2e7127d1692f7b7ac6d50c064955cf6d
f179a889cf03bd56247309c9c0a8aa8689d98f4c
F20101204_AACOVO vidoz_m_Page_087.tif
89cb76c86dc9389423f65e80b8cbdcad
344850cbe8c9e1257c3a0d6d9388c1fc156b1c02
F20101204_AACOUZ vidoz_m_Page_072.tif
c536e68234347eb29f6f159682c0695a
fc0e7b9456a0d87d2fa4080f16d3650b79df04a9
1956 F20101204_AACPBJ vidoz_m_Page_025.txt
428826b941b74001bbd5a404c978c969
4ff921ab79951853e137c4a43adf9bb896198852
F20101204_AACOWD vidoz_m_Page_102.tif
942d77ed45ea34b074aa7ada73484f71
287d6a5afd44f406f3722fb24a434b6bbab0c77e
2469 F20101204_AACPAV vidoz_m_Page_010.txt
3725161d12759eb24061d8e298e6fe76
312acbc23869f4af858f1f5cd13f21dda1e471ca
F20101204_AACOVP vidoz_m_Page_088.tif
ffb135c8252b44be829ae5fddf07dfb2
03ee0a4f4a6504e341ded4bcf6fb3b1527edbf17
1931 F20101204_AACPBK vidoz_m_Page_026.txt
8353a32d4d704bc024ed6cda6b2e60e4
75e9d629e90497c11fdb1aa6a4fc3670487e2aad
F20101204_AACOWE vidoz_m_Page_103.tif
9bf2d1a6c61131deb5ac2af38e1bf923
c5136f245cdd3766716abfe57d676a59ecc28503
1751 F20101204_AACPAW vidoz_m_Page_012.txt
8607877a2ecc8f19c3d46a71706e8a22
6d8e7b122856383167239455319abbb4e5001bdb
F20101204_AACOVQ vidoz_m_Page_089.tif
fb3d4ab828b6d935496a055231d5e547
7136aeb6c1d40b5d655e2011bcd0fe953f69da27
1846 F20101204_AACPBL vidoz_m_Page_027.txt
a0a656e6ed0eeff09b6f3d6dd0cc9cf5
7d365a890d02ebbf6b52f63b81112294088fe480
F20101204_AACOWF vidoz_m_Page_104.tif
7444ec237260d5ba6c6f6b49133b9015
5b045f258b3f5e3ed7e918f48e7e1a1bafeb97b4
1785 F20101204_AACPAX vidoz_m_Page_013.txt
91c27243246fdf73ef67535fe305f36f
21d22be42d3ffd196e4d979adf784f4b5caa3e94
F20101204_AACOVR vidoz_m_Page_090.tif
17a4a0a3f7893d09256d2b27b51eb824
0979ec91c52703ba3395619d4391ef63c2505ce4
2098 F20101204_AACPBM vidoz_m_Page_028.txt
6e565e92da6bf6f005dbaabbf2401557
219c574beff933ec636844be49a40aa7a5546d79
F20101204_AACOWG vidoz_m_Page_105.tif
ecaef24b45a2425e4fe85ec3ad8583a4
e4e40a04aa6e4ac1e8f8e82e40665294c96c7a7c
1851 F20101204_AACPAY vidoz_m_Page_014.txt
9a00f44238d5783fa9c61fe7e6bfa0f5
4f8f69770c97312e498f1e22eac303f508bb3608
206 F20101204_AACPCA vidoz_m_Page_043.txt
55b751df88c2dfeeb603482f88fe2ef7
0411b928d60c88522a8e042ce1f8a0a4e9744cd6
726 F20101204_AACPBN vidoz_m_Page_029.txt
8b77f6c5a8507d8692ce7e0fc7ebb6ae
4c0d097f761875feb28cf59ca6e62825edb13807
F20101204_AACOWH vidoz_m_Page_106.tif
28f9f1ead989393dac743fe24ef09de8
7720dec910c482bc33a0555c9a9b5cc74150fb87
1968 F20101204_AACPAZ vidoz_m_Page_015.txt
bf53fb78519807a5ace67403f1fbb3df
4ac4e326ed466c67cdc5c5daa82c849f642a437a
F20101204_AACOVS vidoz_m_Page_091.tif
8dd58b8c3573bcf957743c12105d3b5f
205053d6bcfd601b25712c14f10127aba8267c0e
1888 F20101204_AACPCB vidoz_m_Page_044.txt
92491a04d888b81d6637931c22686721
13304ddb4c04783f598f689edad695618be9f7a2
1693 F20101204_AACPBO vidoz_m_Page_030.txt
321178d52bec1b34b906cfc0822561a4
1a084d4afab26d510b069813b1193bf0521fe2aa
F20101204_AACOWI vidoz_m_Page_107.tif
1accc501ba359f8eff485a61b1a942c3
dfdd82c0509d0e321dce753835e4df27ef3f0a07
F20101204_AACOVT vidoz_m_Page_092.tif
353fd1b2398950b29a51d2b63bc34503
e428235e262a0f5c890238bf3c18987848ea0be7
1938 F20101204_AACPCC vidoz_m_Page_045.txt
96f9bf1d43108a7ec16c3840d693784b
5e5b515f58a403dc7b44f3d012d709471d599b8d
1924 F20101204_AACPBP vidoz_m_Page_031.txt
6ddcf371d6d315920ec42c954e14a158
8d173502625b651f16b31a1b95c104746c738e7f
F20101204_AACOWJ vidoz_m_Page_108.tif
fa33cb2546653f5d729f8c6267c529bb
8ce6279bd83a04c1994af69d54f3cf396024a82c
F20101204_AACOVU vidoz_m_Page_093.tif
02c22e12cfc1244ffe18752fcc603a41
26af66753a989d21f88000f58dfbf6189e788874
1716 F20101204_AACPCD vidoz_m_Page_046.txt
d8980c347e18ba6335879ee102a16dac
879abb77f4d983c5dae6eb0301b84c87113aec73
951 F20101204_AACPBQ vidoz_m_Page_032.txt
2f2d1cbf00523a66152a4542c6eb0ba7
41c45048df89d291b9dc89230dfc1e9d6a426ea9
8680 F20101204_AACOWK vidoz_m_Page_001.pro
5913ad1a7e2c2bb0c6895fb857e3d0a2
5936276d927b16a70557e7a0ca1221f9ce73ac79
F20101204_AACOVV vidoz_m_Page_094.tif
b15a9a4b39f3cd202c0bf91d603ea470
7b32517534e261c760d5112af8e29da2c649c82a
1886 F20101204_AACPCE vidoz_m_Page_047.txt
0a0c0f374d36a436b374c85660b29bad
8a59f56ffe75ac973680d4783c94bf2e1358d122
1266 F20101204_AACPBR vidoz_m_Page_033.txt
1a2a8c8fd114d7a6fa2087cfaca875b4
5212d4fd31311af9a08fb8d7b0863094e4b0fa8d
1223 F20101204_AACOWL vidoz_m_Page_002.pro
75ced8e4a5d67f1b09b735b0784916f9
e92c5f3ee735ee9864a97bafcace0a00008bb7c3
F20101204_AACOVW vidoz_m_Page_095.tif
a64ac8e5c788c14b89acfbe70c55f303
1f2479465aec0817712c2185ab70053a9ba82bc7
1859 F20101204_AACPCF vidoz_m_Page_048.txt
1d0c4a9acba499a2aa2157e4ac5d97cc
53ac594c60cb3887f65f9179a00eee05310c5ab3
1900 F20101204_AACPBS vidoz_m_Page_034.txt
de6fa196fa4ed4d9149b6da9463e22d5
ebec4b786fc0ad0eb260b50de5bdae28b47a8ea3
1687 F20101204_AACOWM vidoz_m_Page_003.pro
e1ef7e643058b86cac29331babb19f92
c304376caf32e7cd11508d8beac7a97f607ef8f3
F20101204_AACOVX vidoz_m_Page_096.tif
7a3312c6cb99766a1669105390a0ec19
217b3d23a8a230ffae975b278cad27b23530f613
1918 F20101204_AACPCG vidoz_m_Page_049.txt
7114fc08a3ae539f9dbd2c5ae5fb2eef
d129c66f80dcc3cc9af0a9365e0046c8709bba77
36152 F20101204_AACOXA vidoz_m_Page_017.pro
40f63076f8f0f4fc0628f1a474702826
64b77e4387233bd7c6b60d4f4f7f1671458fa76c
1954 F20101204_AACPBT vidoz_m_Page_035.txt
e16052789f41e6ed32decee8c081cbbb
8a7f595031cb803d0ffe9d86b4fce476d2a041b8
34932 F20101204_AACOWN vidoz_m_Page_004.pro
aba8ddcaa8f30ddb5a3d17e36387a7da
073448a3264f515645029d02aac59f934160638f
F20101204_AACOVY vidoz_m_Page_097.tif
3250a2676e731fd919f1907533474bfe
62629284e3086c3536e8a5e8b115aa905b08338c
1930 F20101204_AACPCH vidoz_m_Page_050.txt
234c519fc17bf96872ec2b05e9caeb45
0f0850a63ad07da51b334134cbc2a9c35549c202
44106 F20101204_AACOXB vidoz_m_Page_018.pro
68c51a2224e3f6dd9128b5dc0be3b430
399dd4cee21b3043fed536197a678fc5d7960a48
57613 F20101204_AACOWO vidoz_m_Page_005.pro
c6b3f62600cc8c07eb872f9131ba69d9
cd34416731f737898ee18433aa5cf357ad6017b8
F20101204_AACOVZ vidoz_m_Page_098.tif
243f8e1f0d7798a445b5d0e4facbb9f8
52e44312ab3ec8d67eb3f35fe9a7ad95ec69d688
1925 F20101204_AACPCI vidoz_m_Page_051.txt
e3a26cdf262f2becaba1a13eb237127c
16ba87c5e489dcbc82a4c8a6e0d226b77471b120
49850 F20101204_AACOXC vidoz_m_Page_019.pro
3bc5beae88edd18a6478b71f60bd37f9
dea44ef35a28e6089358949c919df11a81f6dd55
1782 F20101204_AACPBU vidoz_m_Page_036.txt
5ad66e492447c858abaff7d8f8788d2c
83171b1f6a8a8b3c73d757a1b476ef7e2607eda3
65416 F20101204_AACOWP vidoz_m_Page_006.pro
94f83ed42da9546516ac66c8d6979421
2ee556b1663d9facde5957f8d344810364aa0084
1999 F20101204_AACPCJ vidoz_m_Page_053.txt
2927734e12b7edadaa3b1a203c123664
31e803b17ecea10f1fcdfae2e3d46101d8e7f009
50270 F20101204_AACOXD vidoz_m_Page_020.pro
d5cbd58f7c37b93936b0e040294ab20b
cc61c583ca92d348b4ef5c33052fb7c06d82205a
2007 F20101204_AACPBV vidoz_m_Page_037.txt
9bfffaceb6bd4e267d17eb720fd47366
713f4286de64ed209b8007c0a83b7c5bf9674bc0
62772 F20101204_AACOWQ vidoz_m_Page_007.pro
00d1c88521fb42d184df5fc8ab1e0502
d221a2c56acb801f8a46c5aea8cae8d92f27aa70
F20101204_AACPCK vidoz_m_Page_054.txt
09286e2525a53aa43227bce85c85511b
640b4f93806ee0c38c3a41b5b4358bdce6ec5748
51216 F20101204_AACOXE vidoz_m_Page_021.pro
a67f5e195b5bfa3cd2c1d339d90edb6c
3fafba18237a6f18ca6acda581e573dcf1c6e636
1794 F20101204_AACPBW vidoz_m_Page_038.txt
68f41c8ab70c55e2afc9bdada65a8759
7a5ca626050264da33c754829d6e48ad541ca516
76390 F20101204_AACOWR vidoz_m_Page_008.pro
a476bcb0ad686768c303d4992c510f2d
ddf7f087bb272f2061a1d4add8034c48d1f6199c
1965 F20101204_AACPCL vidoz_m_Page_055.txt
8ff0429bee3888f88994a461d37b021c
9296ff6031babd9eedd322e757c561cb9c051e10
53288 F20101204_AACOXF vidoz_m_Page_022.pro
36c72388112b50f285e7e9594d92b530
0667da26af56b2821d49c9d487adad9f1e57dbc0
2012 F20101204_AACPBX vidoz_m_Page_039.txt
bcb247516cdac70e049daf30cd55fdf8
b988ea78f4ed3668550fb9aef10b346536856b39
12626 F20101204_AACOWS vidoz_m_Page_009.pro
72a96b9ce8e86789b4a7364145d3806b
8f8ea4e7e51366dda19ce5c74f681dc68fcc01b2
971 F20101204_AACPDA vidoz_m_Page_070.txt
78ca6f581c1175d80ab4abe759f3f796
e054bbbd3e19d48cf947a1d663f6ed75f3409171
2059 F20101204_AACPCM vidoz_m_Page_056.txt
97512a8bf7fd573c7645a3d0e42dc7a8
9582903189962e13e1d74ae28d16c49469465c79
53034 F20101204_AACOXG vidoz_m_Page_023.pro
4ccfb29703eff2e862cf4155982612e6
ccda8f5e1a0ce55611581784d8a28239d5ebc5a5
1835 F20101204_AACPBY vidoz_m_Page_040.txt
fa1a02efb29489a5559dfd062710ee16
c60a4893b0c62a0343173422742974f954f111ba
697 F20101204_AACPDB vidoz_m_Page_071.txt
6f1521386adb8de50adea73bc3cfaa5f
0f65a81ed458c3b61317bff88cd4f0e8feb775ec
F20101204_AACPCN vidoz_m_Page_057.txt
4d16165d856a51426e135de5fbad9f77
1f0f8a9dcbdeb0d25801741a557365d7ebcc972c
48693 F20101204_AACOXH vidoz_m_Page_024.pro
eed18ff5d66ea9fb2d6efa73191ae12c
17284d5f945bd193746409612c9dba24f6c0ec0c
235 F20101204_AACPBZ vidoz_m_Page_041.txt
d63d833c9c490e9c4bd855f5fe3833fc
715e315b2875b2b15004c57d7391abcb2d3a0d91
60929 F20101204_AACOWT vidoz_m_Page_010.pro
af348ac3fc2f6b7edf6da18a422b4626
e6349f0e361b8bb383307808f1d6ea694f32ebae
994 F20101204_AACPDC vidoz_m_Page_072.txt
b848bad227d4ec4793e3690d94268614
0d390248c58e2955ca796c51aac584a9ac42abfc
2064 F20101204_AACPCO vidoz_m_Page_058.txt
2ae078fd8b7cc70d8a5b0892de2ae473
5cb4adf6345e2cc1fe946d1be31707f43eafbad0
49475 F20101204_AACOXI vidoz_m_Page_025.pro
cdb9658f5ec8b9ee8431b4f760f0cffc
81cd67e4cfe9aa933d91a71d952ee6b3c76d9200
48670 F20101204_AACOWU vidoz_m_Page_011.pro
de969ea2cf7d5167658fc32046ba283f
951aca7bbc4088a95e0d546b4e93485cbd8de41a
824 F20101204_AACPDD vidoz_m_Page_073.txt
dccc0fa42db7a88021e3321d491ac4e6
4c570a1e8fea35ce6501c1982f5908c319b06b0f
1632 F20101204_AACPCP vidoz_m_Page_059.txt
ac03812f7aa54d654e403664fbc68792
f0798590f0bb7b145a251f8b4bac2304f86d3126
48542 F20101204_AACOXJ vidoz_m_Page_026.pro
a8c123514453f6f5d88218211fca772b
1981074f0efb8142c6148db121fbfe2b25e69484
39351 F20101204_AACOWV vidoz_m_Page_012.pro
b7fa177f519d44445f4dbbeb35f33a25
d1baee57705e0ec70ca71c83c8e0b3f7871fd86a
1990 F20101204_AACPDE vidoz_m_Page_074.txt
9d9568e83fffef5ffe28adee3da85fa0
fcb6d1af02c9ac57328e9dcd01da05b6f82a423f
2020 F20101204_AACPCQ vidoz_m_Page_060.txt
1e75142cc77d3421d2aefab0bd4ea13c
7b956055ae7d745d5e852fb673ccd599f8a9e4e3
46123 F20101204_AACOXK vidoz_m_Page_027.pro
a79348b15a4b9bb5a582c6307975cd1a
0ad3d78a541b77057e0071e9288551c82d314f8c
44919 F20101204_AACOWW vidoz_m_Page_013.pro
c0759d3c7c821d03bdf67a8bce4222f3
3de0916cdb728c5bb90fcff3cb4a2f781fce4f28
2041 F20101204_AACPDF vidoz_m_Page_075.txt
6a3e8cbba73f9e7abe35bee7e8806889
1356834924e8824c81a0173a83ccde8c0455b87e
1471 F20101204_AACPCR vidoz_m_Page_061.txt
74f3f543978b43f1983156c4e900ea7d
4478fc4782b79a5bfd66e6c7240405b4797f0bf5
53377 F20101204_AACOXL vidoz_m_Page_028.pro
acae4e8e45185648a5304ceaf0b09a5a
60e584ecd6883a8dba0150b6bde5550c059767fd
44651 F20101204_AACOWX vidoz_m_Page_014.pro
4d603d09f11daffa796e50e9c43c5ea8
496917f310158f5dbafb11df7d29e1d1f2292a44
1897 F20101204_AACPDG vidoz_m_Page_076.txt
f5afc069daf2624ff16aaf8531291942
3833812e5b84cc9599f0b886ed02cb0988c4470b
3834 F20101204_AACOYA vidoz_m_Page_043.pro
10eec1b4edab7ad18312befc1758e870
cc790705fa6505af8e793bfd9779f37e9589db40
1275 F20101204_AACPCS vidoz_m_Page_062.txt
9d9ebab392f5b679f387deeb5c5b1578
57e8dc8dc0dd7a6c360626688376f06baed402d0
18055 F20101204_AACOXM vidoz_m_Page_029.pro
1c3e700d3198f5cee6df36cf7caf4b32
f2d07bdd16f73f6419f87010fda1e0b004970850
49969 F20101204_AACOWY vidoz_m_Page_015.pro
fff795af79ceabb8bdc2ce96c5647f5c
af13d73f6dca5a426929eb26c4d18e7b978ae920
2121 F20101204_AACPDH vidoz_m_Page_077.txt
13c528d77508bd8dad939cade8d31b6c
4b142d2a68292120f24180612baa255452afb2da
45712 F20101204_AACOYB vidoz_m_Page_044.pro
4c8ba7aee7122c9df3ab89adc3ec6d17
fdec291eaeb55bc682ab3e18fd458369feecce77
1685 F20101204_AACPCT vidoz_m_Page_063.txt
2f6606cbd52c454a090a355acdff8822
b15912ef7424d39da9041092827515ec3f487522
39124 F20101204_AACOXN vidoz_m_Page_030.pro
b1aff4a9f88506670c91e6b382cc9010
6d84a58151f0c607bc8aee712e4009283b1645b1
48836 F20101204_AACOWZ vidoz_m_Page_016.pro
f6b487763f45f22e61f9c710927a6766
8785f4014ecdfacb2e132614611cdfc133063622
2043 F20101204_AACPDI vidoz_m_Page_078.txt
9ba12e46144b7249d73f0188ca27829b
3649d1ca9213256c9c4d5402a4ef4e4eac96391b
48008 F20101204_AACOYC vidoz_m_Page_045.pro
ee0054b2c8fea5337fd5ed8063489403
3b184fa3fdf4222c12acc1560673b151d49a3a34
931 F20101204_AACPCU vidoz_m_Page_064.txt
74da84d56283e80f23ce16674b1f537e
173fdd00e39cf65fecc68ba4750e27b94027a28b
48684 F20101204_AACOXO vidoz_m_Page_031.pro
32ec80dbff31e650aed505631dfe5e28
a648cbd5a29c6d41be1b96e63078c6dd565eefd4
2120 F20101204_AACPDJ vidoz_m_Page_079.txt
effea5133876771d548bb9f5e5c19f97
0a109c0ac59a86c57ccdbe18797b62d213102e4f
43035 F20101204_AACOYD vidoz_m_Page_046.pro
0ce0fe1addc7ebe8f57c5d21f0d840ad
1eb925c20ad2ede86b2d41a202808121afec5917
352 F20101204_AACPCV vidoz_m_Page_065.txt
4519a4fcca3142ece50a798868d42b7c
50ff479f2070498778638b9db4e0fd771c55f4be
23110 F20101204_AACOXP vidoz_m_Page_032.pro
a411f2e4daeebd7116c33e55377d0e1a
7f22662c685b1c92cf4034c321e4629cdd98e835
2168 F20101204_AACPDK vidoz_m_Page_080.txt
1e89fd6f8462e03156336dab62ae8c50
94637a25b8fd0d27a2eeec949457d7a46fc8797b
47828 F20101204_AACOYE vidoz_m_Page_047.pro
ef127c2afbd15357f31625d711c108c4
49ceb57c87788cf40f13542290d5573894f32024
731 F20101204_AACPCW vidoz_m_Page_066.txt
1b0a1c53fb4963d1b625b73bb4613794
a2358fac87f67b3650e4793758d061c13b108a36
23095 F20101204_AACOXQ vidoz_m_Page_033.pro
5f282bc3ef73a9649ad83850b8817c02
5b18b73e8721fc8200718a913a8581dedb910db8
2132 F20101204_AACPDL vidoz_m_Page_081.txt
272ce41c5ff42721b4e610561c5a6449
ad66278359db6ce7691bfc1a10fa890a89ccd6cf
46942 F20101204_AACOYF vidoz_m_Page_048.pro
85e09445aba9c6aa55020941ff75849b
3ea41254fac769889c82a031fa78360dc8350b5a
919 F20101204_AACPCX vidoz_m_Page_067.txt
f4b49514c1794669da9dee47ea5d62a3
f496ded27ed60c118f957a7cbfcbf7423ee1fac6
46068 F20101204_AACOXR vidoz_m_Page_034.pro
1448a4e3f7a178ee8f4a11e7632d71ed
d52bf47d0644a47532b9bf032aa3f6b3a880de4e
F20101204_AACPDM vidoz_m_Page_082.txt
0f1bf6bce3614cdf1ebc486bb63bc484
2869c05530b67a73ca2de9db98f8a9b4d432f262
47554 F20101204_AACOYG vidoz_m_Page_049.pro
36c9bcf316c446e5ccba69b2fbb317d5
e683a22a930e6c58b8dfb19ce71a58fc7966ce02
1102 F20101204_AACPCY vidoz_m_Page_068.txt
bc0c832ca1f134c7bcf0343c62cc5813
cfd4ea5359d3f92a0213fcd0f3c2483ec46256d4
48733 F20101204_AACOXS vidoz_m_Page_035.pro
c1a066e1f5c3ac0ef054f03262c74243
2539976477ca2e4b970dce0c17e0ee744859ced2
852 F20101204_AACPEA vidoz_m_Page_096.txt
43bee22c38fa308d54397126322e8257
9bec04716fb2aaac36620a9ffd022a081e724f40
1600 F20101204_AACPDN vidoz_m_Page_083.txt
2dfc5386d1a2f03974e3fc37b2a7594f
1461a271a156c5d3e03200f95afa1235a1ed18df
48855 F20101204_AACOYH vidoz_m_Page_050.pro
5ab12fc1475a242dd8f937f243f7559a
6f0868ac78583c3dcf5db945a2742f2cef491af3
910 F20101204_AACPCZ vidoz_m_Page_069.txt
20bacc7a8de8e03cc8ee2d6f6a509294
6c6991bff06e11dc8ced46ab87a77c8e690af8ab
44236 F20101204_AACOXT vidoz_m_Page_036.pro
60cd9837103206d046d0bf7464142804
f9fa79774e538697b1f080064d3db7c227955bde
735 F20101204_AACPEB vidoz_m_Page_097.txt
04d14eb64291aff1bfeb9a1af464ccef
38e2d2a001e1a04ae0c88923acdbfad44182b044
857 F20101204_AACPDO vidoz_m_Page_084.txt
b711899898f0a9d7ddc9b453de5a9bd4
9ec97364f61866f90e58be2a1449e34de255cb10
48631 F20101204_AACOYI vidoz_m_Page_051.pro
903fbe3b55de8645845f9cc89d84931c
ae9ddda0c1cbfff0f873d60db0ea97cabb95602e
459 F20101204_AACPEC vidoz_m_Page_098.txt
541467537e7b30f648c24c7c4fe05bbe
ac13904b13d3ade16a6e0bdb603e443a5e13a0d9
862 F20101204_AACPDP vidoz_m_Page_085.txt
9233208d1c88dff7c22c3c22f92c1992
03526db60499827f7582c1942d8592fadff87383
51495 F20101204_AACOYJ vidoz_m_Page_052.pro
bda69d0b57214598286a45a89df45226
3eb26a44cc97113249fae71395935b67e0d7aa43
50932 F20101204_AACOXU vidoz_m_Page_037.pro
bf7768d1cf9f9dd40462a3014219e864
576260d81ec5eca736b77debbe03f13e1f5b632f
F20101204_AACPED vidoz_m_Page_099.txt
3bcc19a61fb42b159f0ca771414f501d
efde440e373931618b3788114623983880dfd03d
401 F20101204_AACPDQ vidoz_m_Page_086.txt
188afd2ed05a752031ffcc284b93d96d
5abe44bbba239c79dcf12abdc6ed86ed6d0b941b
50860 F20101204_AACOYK vidoz_m_Page_053.pro
424c91f222bc0677a9d52e909afca5c9
42932660370b6171956ff2b0b8cbc66126c55abb
45138 F20101204_AACOXV vidoz_m_Page_038.pro
353be7dbb06666acc3f474c57d073095
f8a6b6b5f53af61b913cc7f777a6ca7e56d595ee
2738 F20101204_AACPEE vidoz_m_Page_100.txt
2ea4c6e32e6f818553d49ff2b37429cc
506938ca912f8ab670105b2bcd3ecc080db8399c
1881 F20101204_AACPDR vidoz_m_Page_087.txt
bcb38bc819abd3a2e57379a4a4279c43
fa6bcfd105a96f7695bf805766c930cc2b040131
48955 F20101204_AACOYL vidoz_m_Page_054.pro
5114292b7de61b7814915b57c8548cf5
6976a686b031cc28685a66e9898d5799d2481f33
50850 F20101204_AACOXW vidoz_m_Page_039.pro
eb0a8e8ccbb6d232e4347b38662a4d0c
d0f70b6d7f0970debaa656af213bad01054c5908
2397 F20101204_AACPEF vidoz_m_Page_101.txt
53e73d58e60b062ff55c152c5d5ce9f2
db2e644e5d0af409f2bb04d0d31267a77cd219b9
14295 F20101204_AACOZA vidoz_m_Page_070.pro
d49675bf64d476822f5200eae228daa0
2d9cb4cf6e102bfa9a04dc02a86b65742537e14d
1786 F20101204_AACPDS vidoz_m_Page_088.txt
8fc51591a4e5b26d9a2d43962869ffea
fbeea374aa679ceab45825ad62c15872764958ea
49808 F20101204_AACOYM vidoz_m_Page_055.pro
7927cb1b4d4c5499324aa82824bff97b
44a666eaabeb90bf48d375279d090398f57fc172
45441 F20101204_AACOXX vidoz_m_Page_040.pro
e3a3095825d956b7e7c274075e6c24d3
60ef9030798520d486fea5ae26df729373fbd93d
2358 F20101204_AACPEG vidoz_m_Page_102.txt
8feb43178ed5ef2af1f90188b3d4f27d
ae50cd8c19e87e7fb0ef843835061d6b55c7442c
13397 F20101204_AACOZB vidoz_m_Page_071.pro
f05e06790ed1f5543b0daca50ea8c233
40ab1854f57b991b5a9234bb32fabfea5d361d21
1534 F20101204_AACPDT vidoz_m_Page_089.txt
21303c5e1bee973606b294e7314d00bb
ec2a20fa2709d36dab356ea5441ca0242d118e3f
48597 F20101204_AACOYN vidoz_m_Page_057.pro
ca5418bd2389e924d1c3f30dff73f75d
9176da6bcfd817245e72c2811e6f33fb75968d02
4829 F20101204_AACOXY vidoz_m_Page_041.pro
b35806194f905c7961594d270af9fa8d
72b7c25dcd9687b74e1cc170d94596c689296a14
2662 F20101204_AACPEH vidoz_m_Page_103.txt
99ec60c4aba75a235e4c420c78075d2f
e68724f42d8297f39c424db4548ee206050e4279
14084 F20101204_AACOZC vidoz_m_Page_072.pro
65b4c79ffaec4a23eb92777bb1b01bc1
9184df2c327b9808cc23f991441608d0f67fc99e
F20101204_AACPDU vidoz_m_Page_090.txt
4c2e15bed3c10805a2237994d4ea7518
b5203f85b6ca2f779c11fbc316db91348bdca385
51387 F20101204_AACOYO vidoz_m_Page_058.pro
50f97b3783e2b196bc2cb1562fa40c6f
c639797ced6f77571753eec211af6ae53b183456
21887 F20101204_AACOXZ vidoz_m_Page_042.pro
848e180cbf37f140827bd5b074e6b47a
a3fc784fd4ef2a343ced2e44b177de299dae9959
2427 F20101204_AACPEI vidoz_m_Page_104.txt
5a1b938fd03b725362866b043c72c50f
2ff8e2f62f046e1f4156177a2d235046cce87f05
14383 F20101204_AACOZD vidoz_m_Page_073.pro
2a59ed986fac94568de126f7424365c2
9e91e55e0d24992a0b2bf7a931d43006677c7ae9
1832 F20101204_AACPDV vidoz_m_Page_091.txt
6810c489a7f79187472e24793b8d014a
e98f0ef3e4708fd9a26429c1e31bcaeafa6bb49b
40262 F20101204_AACOYP vidoz_m_Page_059.pro
5ac00bb781af9c6f75a5ece516e69f68
bc344ad1985ada4079e7f82ccfcba0c86351283e
2433 F20101204_AACPEJ vidoz_m_Page_105.txt
95ce25e96e88ac6716cf32c5dfe228f9
bbd1a0bcec738a2ce7e8421d4534c0e35b88d22f
47978 F20101204_AACOZE vidoz_m_Page_074.pro
8763c1c25a2848fdf0e668124dbc0bc0
68b884fc68afb6120c134b2794dd8b0403094382
1525 F20101204_AACPDW vidoz_m_Page_092.txt
f5063aef92a314c45ec4578cb85bd820
a3902645ebed36275dc788746faf5b707d3726a4
48959 F20101204_AACOYQ vidoz_m_Page_060.pro
15d5664f5323f61b8a93b524e0111249
aa3cd225c45b0eefbed37e3467acabc7f2fde04a
2465 F20101204_AACPEK vidoz_m_Page_106.txt
2eafc9fb32abba10efd1f15042de5702
e4ab9d8afd0e6475da96be4c607c5312c640c8fd
50899 F20101204_AACOZF vidoz_m_Page_075.pro
809b1c0e6e0cfc876fba94fca0dd94a2
15b9e6fa1fa55858b6331fe52754a3c0c33c4f33
1653 F20101204_AACPDX vidoz_m_Page_093.txt
ff9dea847f10e8dfb19e99ca6bdf060b
6a3a8f364b14e524cf505f178f2783518a70c118
33815 F20101204_AACOYR vidoz_m_Page_061.pro
2a3472fdaf75d78b48ef637393e8ee2a
33cdc7226be461c28e488c817e0d89886e4da759
19763 F20101204_AACPFA vidoz_m_Page_062.QC.jpg
aab58611e603d28b1f9934f3fe9eb2cf
1fe120ac28edcdc9a8c34e2472e3dff8d7308bc6
173 F20101204_AACPEL vidoz_m_Page_107.txt
419d38061369cf2cfaeec0cbfa38772d
87fea6f6c4ba9a1eb58444866cf231c62cce5c3d
47052 F20101204_AACOZG vidoz_m_Page_076.pro
78bb1f548051e7cf1a5982ea46a1cec8
123c2060ca0ffc8e1a62948e85eb544bd200682d
1561 F20101204_AACPDY vidoz_m_Page_094.txt
dbc31be98b8fd5986dcc5a05658e3d2a
8b6faf9678cbcfa1a89ab02594f2df1f61c2ec7d
29927 F20101204_AACOYS vidoz_m_Page_062.pro
5e9886dc012c2d94c5e7f1f9a002a003
bc5705204411c9cf88a39c5154b0ca5e6a55fe2b
1012 F20101204_AACPEM vidoz_m_Page_108.txt
1523e9782ed5e05af2db81db17d94c53
290372e7062c302767f9c48589a82c6969fef0b7
53794 F20101204_AACOZH vidoz_m_Page_077.pro
d8d121f271099a5476bbe5136b2927b2
68e3379c66ca73a7e969a6f2fb7d88ef97c71a2f
1667 F20101204_AACPDZ vidoz_m_Page_095.txt
e28c1ca509a49662c5a492a1b0d50376
66100978eb60c08b02643ea1edcec8d35d21a494
38667 F20101204_AACOYT vidoz_m_Page_063.pro
71f08bac630cfbe3a6ed3030f528a5e0
a217bdf5bc8fbb765e305c2e61ee6274b447287a
32399 F20101204_AACPFB vidoz_m_Page_057.QC.jpg
e2b94f8621a91fa04eb5c2e7eddfe523
450d0bc5344113829a6b869a7d0af99944ba932f
2255 F20101204_AACPEN vidoz_m_Page_001thm.jpg
c064c58b5ad5f6eb8e293e9032010de7
020d3e674da154315d424fc511845eca840ae980
51859 F20101204_AACOZI vidoz_m_Page_078.pro
9c6023345294f377c5c2deaa57585f16
beec49fdda49d949e73c78e05c43b4b0170493a6
17482 F20101204_AACOYU vidoz_m_Page_064.pro
3ecd27a462c8b752e94eb63b2c823666
b6aa3fdf0e4a38e6037a83cf1efa69134c387a77
7595 F20101204_AACPFC vidoz_m_Page_046thm.jpg
d45847cc9fedf2b64607831172c9f3eb
0d8fb89ac7ddd6f64ef095647143345a19483fbd
696423 F20101204_AACPEO vidoz_m.pdf
e11a6c18704ca8eb1a4c5a3b90199117
a5059381dd767682a96c76d1e4c2788e56437883
54014 F20101204_AACOZJ vidoz_m_Page_079.pro
6564a7cd946b710ca3334dd23ee34590
6c3995bf37f1e479090d7591c1e486d2d19c2c52
7845 F20101204_AACPFD vidoz_m_Page_036thm.jpg
b6274683e89ee43e65eeef70c3ce5de7
b096099d6147f831a90bfe1e4aa785290ff90abf
8499 F20101204_AACPEP vidoz_m_Page_021thm.jpg
34c7272ac26f6d3c35d0c7f2ee94386f
12779c1b063f38680fe4e533889dad482ea9fa50
55277 F20101204_AACOZK vidoz_m_Page_080.pro
478adca70238b5288dc71aaad908adcf
9a6c6442205d7640faad64eafa9bd0a16f8fc12d
6493 F20101204_AACOYV vidoz_m_Page_065.pro
7c18c3483d9b405969fd8566c0363d10
0155c31459a41d736321b2e27508d5650067cca1
3462 F20101204_AACPFE vidoz_m_Page_096thm.jpg
d5398d61ab9ce15f0c53de535012a83f
ecf1d56d5d3a8a75281ec8c977bebc1c5e068509
8385 F20101204_AACPEQ vidoz_m_Page_023thm.jpg
9a263b309dd90db1ebe2949c1385b063
14fd5e03d79339d8494bfc12ec8b68ec2ca3cbbf
52968 F20101204_AACOZL vidoz_m_Page_081.pro
73e6506c01d64153cc603ca2c50334fa
ca89bad45e7096a44f8891e12b471e530323fd28
14134 F20101204_AACOYW vidoz_m_Page_066.pro
ccbc2a531b36e8634df508f695a072d6
736998c16441988bde91f0de9be3ea54dcb2ce76
16333 F20101204_AACPFF vidoz_m_Page_069.QC.jpg
dfb73c541a1325880f5644aa3b02b7e1
1115644143944d4a1fdb27a256fd43e7bbf13a1d
31553 F20101204_AACPER vidoz_m_Page_076.QC.jpg
10f1f4d40b670183dde06161c5c57661
351fe3e44134b927f658827a36d168750b90e29a
48279 F20101204_AACOZM vidoz_m_Page_082.pro
825b3e90d0248005d21c9fbbb72e554c
411553837e73f5ca805e75c2654ffbc53c9cfcaa
13063 F20101204_AACOYX vidoz_m_Page_067.pro
a6d4eb4924af167c32d4ad34d6fe4def
0ee0f737c9b02b274926b1a8f705946762aa5eeb
27481 F20101204_AACPFG vidoz_m_Page_065.QC.jpg
05ce93ea3d6369c5a6775d40ad37ff93
cf5b1b84178d060c2921b97ba98e9eee1d0ba299
7468 F20101204_AACPES vidoz_m_Page_087thm.jpg
38a37a6d54e0a504ba6b17e040b8a7b9
96b4ce57bfc252b0cf281d65b988e5dd8f6b5142
31638 F20101204_AACOZN vidoz_m_Page_083.pro
b084a7dfab69e53f0bdf61927a62132b
58fd129adc46c465fac74ff88587784b451e4c1b
14353 F20101204_AACOYY vidoz_m_Page_068.pro
c45c60970df7b0654dd704cc0c1357d3
efc00b719934a17f0f996508a9ed268a73a614e7
34031 F20101204_AACPFH vidoz_m_Page_058.QC.jpg
e13a01ae17fa621c859fce8fb9ef3a2d
a58b3b9322ace67815b429c38cd079b086bb8fff
7495 F20101204_AACPET vidoz_m_Page_013thm.jpg
7083ac14d856649ffd6c1dbcac71afa7
0d99b1b652d95dd4910c7e7a7c048fc0035e0179
17131 F20101204_AACOZO vidoz_m_Page_084.pro
5c95c19c975b34f56dbb21cb96139c8e
3093640fdb9d403a153b680210c871fa23f81eb9
14505 F20101204_AACOYZ vidoz_m_Page_069.pro
3f572463f8e836350a0ce04a6094997a
06b4b6de07fe9f62d21b9ac9ab1481a96c86bc02
7421 F20101204_AACPFI vidoz_m_Page_014thm.jpg
dbbb966b5f1842b7023251bec6b55aa9
46be3d229fd52c747f08ea2cfdc670169618c6b1
37456 F20101204_AACPEU vidoz_m_Page_080.QC.jpg
18e393cc68552ed792ee4df5c1e11785
6ecaad4ae7aa7b061924c826b2e8c91b0f92003a
16164 F20101204_AACOZP vidoz_m_Page_085.pro
4a7dc2ccf11f49b4a176564689f1f19c
aca73921151e99ab8ef85cddbc61e7c395d998e2
3354 F20101204_AACPFJ vidoz_m_Page_029thm.jpg
9da2a9b5d44730ddc01c8d1395022da3
67caba67f2018797dd3d29cd4649b0d37c5485bc
8421 F20101204_AACPEV vidoz_m_Page_055thm.jpg
c66e76c967ce14b8c135bfdbe74d8d21
cf07cdf3f16d03cf904867eb5626ee3a76e440ce
45791 F20101204_AACOZQ vidoz_m_Page_087.pro
a14908d7769842d20abf528fd8178708
76d6018b6b924b1582261aadd953162d7ab25e5c
32173 F20101204_AACPFK vidoz_m_Page_016.QC.jpg
7ad1221568da91b753873212d31c3cba
ceccef7079bcafad96701574389ceb77f2179101
26269 F20101204_AACPEW vidoz_m_Page_091.QC.jpg
716cbe735203df7f404b4273bd901f06
2bafeeb1377e6f8f426e789b80a47c3ef7865301
44656 F20101204_AACOZR vidoz_m_Page_088.pro
101a1c866a660105c4c546aa3ea3210c
afa99d4e669e4e2d9ff1b11df76cf6a3d549d3d4
3297 F20101204_AACPGA vidoz_m_Page_107.QC.jpg
cd131806fc3c6ee446e5d712e650d6e9
0d9f17bf13262234affad352eff9aab98a79d01f
40801 F20101204_AACPFL vidoz_m_Page_008.QC.jpg
e45d80015bef04786ccc36217d59ecfd
0b6c846780093ff2e042a8a258f0510a50865138
4161 F20101204_AACPEX vidoz_m_Page_032thm.jpg
4aa10e0ad9ee6276d7ab406732fed861
25488063bba54d028323887711cc0d076467c3f8
37758 F20101204_AACOZS vidoz_m_Page_089.pro
6ab6c50fd9fd5fd51a40b7c7908eacf2
9c9ece7276ca8b2c24d04ec2922579b4fec4df80
8224 F20101204_AACPGB vidoz_m_Page_076thm.jpg
a4691b200de1a91f4be235143364e423
9863eeefd226bb66464f2316fc47f19a7a12356f
30190 F20101204_AACPFM vidoz_m_Page_038.QC.jpg
94229c39354fee62b687f05b3ca675e1
fad6fe370abb096a186e25cfdcccc4938b0344ef
7921 F20101204_AACPEY vidoz_m_Page_047thm.jpg
d0e81a414a986a59434a12fe5b33e8bd
5656072c421541c89e321a5ea9a13862caa35969
43069 F20101204_AACOZT vidoz_m_Page_090.pro
5386097cce91ef208e66511feeda88ce
c70f6f6d15623211c03b0cbb342fb56028c1069f
8738 F20101204_AACPFN vidoz_m_Page_104thm.jpg
6f8513e86d5f7d76c5a46f29e6564591
d2b0cd01f8b8766af789536ec359e49c179d0ace
32692 F20101204_AACPEZ vidoz_m_Page_039.QC.jpg
f012dd42559bd93c2cac655c26de63ed
8884c24fe4ce7fb551175ca8a54b3d4c57df5e90
30998 F20101204_AACPGC vidoz_m_Page_013.QC.jpg
713e0104f61b93c0f6a732fcbc6a383b
e8919869b4bc9847ef4b9902c5227e351f901ec4
16736 F20101204_AACPFO vidoz_m_Page_032.QC.jpg
6256b85bb8342f1bd26076c06953e2e8
f66778a3ec1a9486609cee3ca3ec6f6f79e4c296
39970 F20101204_AACOZU vidoz_m_Page_091.pro
c1504bc4ab933ceaa7f011bde07db948
0f8f7810a57e32c92e620ee5bce2fd991bd92241
8593 F20101204_AACPGD vidoz_m_Page_106thm.jpg
d096c3b2f8104e7a0ce742bd41dbe5ef
47e091eb7e7bb04e05cdb1fd3633daba2f8599ed
8324 F20101204_AACPFP vidoz_m_Page_037thm.jpg
e72fccfb016023bccef4cea086946bb4
c184362f81f3d45ef953b0280a7fbc4de0f99a3b
31657 F20101204_AACOZV vidoz_m_Page_092.pro
6884f6ce9fc0520e1c58ee5e89d8068b
6e8ef2c3d40e72936a127b5ab1ee710ddae00516
32982 F20101204_AACPGE vidoz_m_Page_054.QC.jpg
f8b539be65e410f2ab3c14a669d36c91
3bb2575057650a8aa0f5c9b9699304c890380404
16136 F20101204_AACPFQ vidoz_m_Page_073.QC.jpg
e7a4190608421b44d62449c5e4a2524d
b22dba8e3f73d445f6aa24ed7a2994d2ad9fb8b8
31777 F20101204_AACPGF vidoz_m_Page_048.QC.jpg
b75b9c573e7fc16a579be62005340e83
bf57f5a89f723fc259cb40180fa2c095c13298ed
6453 F20101204_AACPFR vidoz_m_Page_095thm.jpg
d31356e5937bbc2905e547eb4ec9f8f2
f2d6d3b73d9343dfd58bd577e6d13b52de465ba6
35205 F20101204_AACOZW vidoz_m_Page_093.pro
c0c917cd99ea4a074c2ae8b9fedfb3f9
e505d2f27199f006a9e4801d036fd0720aa6fe49
25362 F20101204_AACPGG vidoz_m_Page_012.QC.jpg
7e532b707c3c727e49fe59b929d93a47
b4cfd4ea29300e77b0d45ebc483aad1898227018
32864 F20101204_AACPFS vidoz_m_Page_051.QC.jpg
13fb023ec60d40521dd248adb3f823bd
8d3a89ceac9dc67cc7b129bd628786df7c6ee6ac
34802 F20101204_AACOZX vidoz_m_Page_094.pro
d2e089bb97ba71a5481e7f672372a401
86fbdc5329d5d2cdd45525f4de23998d0e622b7e
18027 F20101204_AACPGH vidoz_m_Page_108.QC.jpg
ef8340d93aa6af24ded90f481b84f35f
77e9dc1967dbce5449b764ea7070f430cdd01892
8687 F20101204_AACPFT vidoz_m_Page_056thm.jpg
24668d20185457f223a2a53bf6ab7bb2
7ce74caebb5b2d4d9b1325d5d03181810f730814
37520 F20101204_AACOZY vidoz_m_Page_095.pro
fa17e2f604b682abf0065b4e01a854dd
374a377693835b324b4f35d2ac336f0e00414ea8
4680 F20101204_AACPGI vidoz_m_Page_041.QC.jpg
0af5dd380ae4abe3e0d5360033bd97f9
f46c5f2141f089de70af6c5200958336ffe7f02a
4450 F20101204_AACPFU vidoz_m_Page_042thm.jpg
3c522fd2f2638e2af5c16eb26c60a103
35d0cf83d75daa4775f6b138cd3c308bab8ea32d
19481 F20101204_AACOZZ vidoz_m_Page_096.pro
9406934bfb73796236136f54b8b71e7b
819fc75f103d456a2946bce6742d2eeb63819bd1
8191 F20101204_AACPGJ vidoz_m_Page_019thm.jpg
af60a1a231d72da73fa33299b87f28a4
52861eb33f07d2d131dcb1521d5424535bd86184
8202 F20101204_AACPFV vidoz_m_Page_020thm.jpg
09c1db6e4e4bdc03015c783e9c081253
3938cf1dbc747c8e3c273d320551eed469fe8aa1
7567 F20101204_AACPGK vidoz_m_Page_044thm.jpg
6d10a56199a8829a7a6639f74c58eb41
6a054f8f3b851193f62a3d2dbfe010daca1e25f0
32403 F20101204_AACPFW vidoz_m_Page_024.QC.jpg
b0b772491d6d8c084db3f94d3b327fee
acd5ed37d32fff56abef7da71e71aa45b097c1b8
7382 F20101204_AACPGL vidoz_m_Page_065thm.jpg
e57e4973b4534532d3cbc625917c3f31
f1ca1cb6cc78352edb631ec1b9a2915cc370891c
8756 F20101204_AACPFX vidoz_m_Page_084thm.jpg
e317152a247629f47710df1fae606a47
19c164b0afe5d7e29b0100352e7913233a939705
F20101204_AACPHA vidoz_m_Page_027.QC.jpg
1e234764854c8fc89655e33937330efa
8009837ec434bcb0bc9b8dadc213053e24ea632b
6879 F20101204_AACPGM vidoz_m_Page_060thm.jpg
8fdabcd2ef0dfba83393d92695ff18cb
198d6a72b0084a445c4ac36faa407210381ed5dd
29496 F20101204_AACPFY vidoz_m_Page_088.QC.jpg
fb3e8c6a2f6d43995d6c5592fee5ca35
dfaf0f2d20e2e3205a6c0f54c7059da74c67484b
7904 F20101204_AACPHB vidoz_m_Page_048thm.jpg
7df71c4c9e7e0ab2b65840cccd8ac395
863915cbfcf24139ad19ed72c52ce14f5232c5d9
36705 F20101204_AACPGN vidoz_m_Page_103.QC.jpg
21cbdeccba0191f6e79a5f0cf153d03c
551c359cf60ff7c73482f3db0e3c71936a8c7b9c
26487 F20101204_AACPFZ vidoz_m_Page_089.QC.jpg
d20685fd8622d22a0c6d3549ee87c5b2
49caa3bdff78dbbfdb89015ba18383219e992b69
8876 F20101204_AACPHC vidoz_m_Page_098.QC.jpg
cb99f54e32facc68a4f5c29946ea76fe
c8f510205b2d86522b80e034a2d1fec37b2068d9
1243 F20101204_AACPGO vidoz_m_Page_041thm.jpg
23696b2a6cbe5fe28e5cabc5764910cc
f5f6eb9a7f4d7a39d8b7e8383de7c674ad7b0e7b
21671 F20101204_AACPGP vidoz_m_Page_083.QC.jpg
70403e4fda045ceea4e21d10893d3fa8
bf62a1a41df1d63381f72505d84b197a0dd52dbd
8757 F20101204_AACPHD vidoz_m_Page_077thm.jpg
20efb393536814c1f1acbc7759b99351
eebd48686500e656b931e2216fb5daba5894d75b
35124 F20101204_AACPGQ vidoz_m_Page_081.QC.jpg
c323b76c71518c9a03aec846696017da
260d3d720552a9f38815e37d7e0d27a8e34c7f02
25589 F20101204_AACPHE vidoz_m_Page_006.QC.jpg
7bff8af8d58ede74771c9a647c448a4f
d5240a67f0909b3e912348d67d154e0be9405828
6786 F20101204_AACPHF vidoz_m_Page_011thm.jpg
00e939b50c04801e34397406148ee63d
3ad7ddaaa3f1c23cb9b1f7adf6488002fa2bfc74
8576 F20101204_AACPGR vidoz_m_Page_022thm.jpg
2de91af54b39ee71d9bbdebb4bd9047d
d2f76aab277697a6fcbccb4c592b5854d75898b5
30825 F20101204_AACPHG vidoz_m_Page_036.QC.jpg
539f63057ea940d359ad3d5b36aa962d
38db8dd23f2c861f85c97ac95d47d98fbe132e92
8000 F20101204_AACPGS vidoz_m_Page_024thm.jpg
42bd31a14d3dca2ea7db14bd823b5c95
39844594c72829913b17a53ec934a09298156a55
8236 F20101204_AACPHH vidoz_m_Page_009.QC.jpg
180c7f23ba9528942c8a094047e4db96
744e306982fff483d0d266d47aadf1851e6f0e59
35861 F20101204_AACPGT vidoz_m_Page_101.QC.jpg
f2885042b0bc135ab0c7c33f81d89569
b67bb5eb47bf523080f4f74aaeaa0b43892257af
28153 F20101204_AACPHI vidoz_m_Page_059.QC.jpg
731add92c13c6aaff9605d5e57386c0a
34c2eae5989d1c7e367b2778972619d7228328db
34663 F20101204_AACPGU vidoz_m_Page_053.QC.jpg
d52e43370da0bf25abd04010a20c5d46
f874f1e3f33e72cef4459f54f0b3abebd17154f0
4759 F20101204_AACPHJ vidoz_m_Page_070thm.jpg
1efa6392f5fef8b3002e2f64ec05c414
048e52657e8bb7a3280a9148f698d22b9826dc9a
33159 F20101204_AACPGV vidoz_m_Page_035.QC.jpg
206f2984fdc43653f75ac09c5ac798b4
78f8e2106b3ca431934d7d338bde10d4333e910c
16584 F20101204_AACPHK vidoz_m_Page_097.QC.jpg
f27862c1a4569ee487fc5d346d86d1c1
26f2a771f34032988778b199b7c8702d1179b7aa
1658 F20101204_AACPGW vidoz_m_Page_002.QC.jpg
a7975d8a00e406918f9ce6e520d4d1b5
741641e2c3221c0a180050cf655459e3cec0ca1d
8152 F20101204_AACPIA vidoz_m_Page_007thm.jpg
d1a1c7f8eb8be1dd3c0dc80382196e8a
e3b2681dd1727f7c000773531f0910b00a10acf2
15969 F20101204_AACPHL vidoz_m_Page_067.QC.jpg
523cbe0853897e6713103432252183b4
ae591a824d734ec32d673d24756c59bae69c0adf
6582 F20101204_AACPGX vidoz_m_Page_091thm.jpg
cd21a8aea3f193076fa5d3f04efcf9eb
f88010156e99b616fd18660e226240bb83c52f87
9861 F20101204_AACPIB vidoz_m_Page_008thm.jpg
d86a7e29cfe0fba4de40b888411b6be0
4396c47407a7f46bcb16d8babcd67e08c49533d3
28602 F20101204_AACPHM vidoz_m_Page_018.QC.jpg
f11da3672b8a07a8dcb5cde84b528aa6
27945f664454d753b99ec860dfc8cec0ffccf762
5774 F20101204_AACPGY vidoz_m_Page_005thm.jpg
5028d9a2bf1ab52ef49d77641e2afd16
afba393666236df60139dd3088caf6a23dea50fa
2228 F20101204_AACPIC vidoz_m_Page_009thm.jpg
733cfc44189bcc9efccd616a1bb53318
8316d7f7a3cf0c3bb2f9bc2c1b09300b527f174d
29887 F20101204_AACPHN vidoz_m_Page_040.QC.jpg
8c52db52f9787ac5854ec14bb6566f74
14a868cc11a2748141dbb3ed3d413dcc0a713144
34751 F20101204_AACPGZ vidoz_m_Page_078.QC.jpg
736173d5bcafb55d746e55fa5a6c317c
13f7dbf60bc2b8faa4cfc72591d38ee6058ecdec
34104 F20101204_AACPID vidoz_m_Page_010.QC.jpg
ce0a8b9d5803a57f2ddca8ea3bc722d8
52725b28a8877ec4583d99ab00f9f93690ab1869
33954 F20101204_AACPHO vidoz_m_Page_021.QC.jpg
cdf4f3723b70d49a8cea833c2885cda1
8063cafabd8e9a53043192cfac9be989b911a919
7815 F20101204_AACPHP vidoz_m_Page_038thm.jpg
594b82d22fa253ec9fd396898f22d40a
662036634cd3f1a8db29f6ea2ecd527b024240bc
8159 F20101204_AACPIE vidoz_m_Page_010thm.jpg
8ec9a2e354ccd6b2d8f86ecb4c44d666
9e1e1a75f53c6ccdae00c058b13834326628fccc
161783 F20101204_AACPHQ UFE0017881_00001.xml FULL
3c61513565100e6633a7e33757b93076
3d73252abf4ac1c8f9e72fadbd1cfc813b1c93c9
28036 F20101204_AACPIF vidoz_m_Page_011.QC.jpg
06a1430a31db461cb27226121cc44220
d6ff39cf0b1c026b2a1bc0a71ec16cb22d651dec
7558 F20101204_AACPHR vidoz_m_Page_001.QC.jpg
89867c17bf6eff6cf249065e0ae30843
ea20e2083e2b8999f041a1313ef4d7c367a1ad28
6563 F20101204_AACPIG vidoz_m_Page_012thm.jpg
1a1e0c47e81d32d9df999f7a02e9a0db
98432102017fbaf16015788ffba273abe6a1d418
626 F20101204_AACPHS vidoz_m_Page_002thm.jpg
2177cf0cb535352debef5e079cadbd37
6f7b51274a5d05e93cb540a711b9fbdf0df1713d
29218 F20101204_AACPIH vidoz_m_Page_014.QC.jpg
bac392019ac5ec774487a8f05e8963a1
c3441d176057da75d7258047277d0b12129737ab
1509 F20101204_AACPHT vidoz_m_Page_003.QC.jpg
407dd256a6cdd45070325349faa42c63
0148891aa56759775cb3f8b190dfb19cc9fd0e9f
32786 F20101204_AACPII vidoz_m_Page_015.QC.jpg
c9df0814fa43c23c36355f6c258f7279
13938145f70f03094e9e68d8d1c06372a0a7bf17
632 F20101204_AACPHU vidoz_m_Page_003thm.jpg
2a7b0de4114084ad95f9c25689b2c136
a4ac94541d9f532773f825557d8824acae3d7412
8350 F20101204_AACPIJ vidoz_m_Page_015thm.jpg
f6e43f61440f8c5ba479935929da3e87
427046d7ec938217ebdd804a3f12e7e9f82bfbe2
23270 F20101204_AACPHV vidoz_m_Page_004.QC.jpg
2f3fe00f6abaa993628cf7f8517508d5
80a0b628a809896b5851ca457166ee6d342f6fae
8145 F20101204_AACPIK vidoz_m_Page_016thm.jpg
2794a1ecc90b9d94efaed3dac5cf957e
ed2f93271eee934bb7f5a192bb4d84a4e58193b3
6495 F20101204_AACPHW vidoz_m_Page_004thm.jpg
d458080b9809cdbeaffb8d93faadd085
f9da6e8ffd7d1bc7ea27be4cef60ca7ce078729d
24838 F20101204_AACPIL vidoz_m_Page_017.QC.jpg
30e49b6330e1f699c46aac312cff3590
d09a7a00f3b4e2aa56861312d03db3f0049942d8
23999 F20101204_AACPHX vidoz_m_Page_005.QC.jpg
d2ca836c9692c2ff4cd23ac2f0cd8322
84ca57df557c6064ff780a575bc93874cd78bd05
26139 F20101204_AACPJA vidoz_m_Page_030.QC.jpg
3943426be9c8d02710049c153d68e043
37de879d9316f92475d69934cbcdbd8b27e61fcb
6119 F20101204_AACPIM vidoz_m_Page_017thm.jpg
4d13a48b8a779b5a855a5d0271b0daea
7db3049069f3a277de65f7f9315ecdc5b4bca676
6238 F20101204_AACPHY vidoz_m_Page_006thm.jpg
1151180e47f19fc2e4bfbc9ec2bc697a
96b8112f7959fd877c7a6820040e28282f9c8042
6967 F20101204_AACPJB vidoz_m_Page_030thm.jpg
a721bf6bd85738abf5c74867e17a35d0
cb7a46ae9b8655077547ef0accf457f27f72ac5d
7258 F20101204_AACPIN vidoz_m_Page_018thm.jpg
ee40c6c72c11cceff40ecc83b1c3b292
8cdb73bd573d83264a5f64170b8083da52432be7
33786 F20101204_AACPHZ vidoz_m_Page_007.QC.jpg
3355a012356890cc8556cd49d0e0ff99
1bb72ba7be779dcc691c248ca3118194b62e3010
33886 F20101204_AACPJC vidoz_m_Page_031.QC.jpg
d2b6d884eb890d4b3b073b744c788dc1
d320db0de41116bc584628ea5dbdc8c3d388cbc8
32830 F20101204_AACPIO vidoz_m_Page_019.QC.jpg
7e05b16abe94d67ca538c7fc520cd60b
5f0982494e0bb9b9948f0001899696a3bb9dc885
8531 F20101204_AACPJD vidoz_m_Page_031thm.jpg
7241ab189d104c6aae319f7a8301effe
a56c03e33d9c9a833438b86e0b1ff08a2afabf0d
33561 F20101204_AACPIP vidoz_m_Page_020.QC.jpg
5592917f4d2c426ebd3168eb0180b501
d7e04378eb9083bf0953b4cf54e766f2b32b7ab7
15059 F20101204_AACPJE vidoz_m_Page_033.QC.jpg
549cd4d63eba471e9f85d61455b40b2a
3f610d38d9dcf5bdde8281b5cdc73f7c9a4df3c4
35526 F20101204_AACPIQ vidoz_m_Page_022.QC.jpg
a5ecc6da7e2d7866254aaa8c291e4ce2
c791da06e8ba5f43b61a1713d14824bea4573bcc
35314 F20101204_AACPIR vidoz_m_Page_023.QC.jpg
6bf3805f32ed5adff52ceca2aafa8b21
905c77fa8f6578ddff60809023693b54da36edb8
3977 F20101204_AACPJF vidoz_m_Page_033thm.jpg
3538bb64b130609ed83b0d39e4d5c339
bfc0056c8f8be25a900b6991cc1b2109f42b4983
32849 F20101204_AACPIS vidoz_m_Page_025.QC.jpg
db91c032212eeecef95cdb701341ac41
413b2ffabe8047a2e0b7668743094ef27e1faaec
30210 F20101204_AACPJG vidoz_m_Page_034.QC.jpg
3baadd8fa30144eed593370202284f50
6c541c6e7ee91556d1f9ae2fe20a9eea1e2192b3
8179 F20101204_AACPIT vidoz_m_Page_025thm.jpg
459b08d36a6f56813b373c2fb5e10f08
b5a71eea6faee4bbb39cea1dbf0c7815f159c184
7593 F20101204_AACPJH vidoz_m_Page_034thm.jpg
fd02d53cf858f79b137ee8bb19360053
af225bfcb700566a3e6b75d1762f0f5349c8264d
32099 F20101204_AACPIU vidoz_m_Page_026.QC.jpg
78713e5a5d468854edd691265c387b02
1e4ad6258df312e84e6fec66b132dce8824a6fa4
8004 F20101204_AACPJI vidoz_m_Page_035thm.jpg
b28e035413d9001267a2a8dae9f0bc48
14a9479f032f4238c62b2d6af7df2b8d24045347
7856 F20101204_AACPIV vidoz_m_Page_026thm.jpg
cf7842e50ff7f6dc31381725c5f617bf
1733710400406bf3263ea905a1f714842e86ee9d
33208 F20101204_AACPJJ vidoz_m_Page_037.QC.jpg
11f0a0bd5a8045cd7b69209b9929b46a
5e98e1816891d4abf15e09f59cdb97518d3858f3
7742 F20101204_AACPIW vidoz_m_Page_027thm.jpg
a326245a0165745b8c9bf477a55620f2
442b0fa907434de24d92ed67a241e16b5b58ffaf
8379 F20101204_AACPJK vidoz_m_Page_039thm.jpg
605bcea948af86d83eccf29a8055d5da
f38e2e39ce6b0669273117839d9cbc1b1ee13cee
34796 F20101204_AACPIX vidoz_m_Page_028.QC.jpg
1fc684330dad649a3d74f2dd6db253aa
40e2b3ff0505b6d35ee8972798a16ab2f583647c
8274 F20101204_AACPKA vidoz_m_Page_054thm.jpg
940fd52cd223a31ca938e883383d83b6
3e206358df94327ab1b0ae28900042a2e6cbfd66
7722 F20101204_AACPJL vidoz_m_Page_040thm.jpg
59b690f46f9549fa6d16c5a07471adf0
d96b019c6116672333e75775a57c710d1b4e7476
F20101204_AACPIY vidoz_m_Page_028thm.jpg
11c1db402e4a32d8092a86f32ef52b91
e76e8234e61c358132e2eb8f35ea6bb963e33d63
33770 F20101204_AACPKB vidoz_m_Page_055.QC.jpg
3784d7fbbd262b347ccc48d5cafbaf0a
bf66d2594e903ea1fafbcccace0bfa0eda0ecde3
16364 F20101204_AACPJM vidoz_m_Page_042.QC.jpg
935d72b59f2b7f9dec0393b0b320d31f
d1c3541f5b052557ca76146934b5164233dede9f
12555 F20101204_AACPIZ vidoz_m_Page_029.QC.jpg
cea9dc13f3e7f8c1685e59e707e999b5
f53e3d836f2469297ceafc8502b2fbe415313207
35092 F20101204_AACPKC vidoz_m_Page_056.QC.jpg
0a88c40718eecc82befb6e836960faeb
26e3feffb569c59c0c082146371ae855afe2bcad
2342 F20101204_AACPJN vidoz_m_Page_043thm.jpg
2d301624b4c24b4c6c93e6278c69a045
cd76367f6a60ca4169039a0b63b72118c9d15e84
8265 F20101204_AACPKD vidoz_m_Page_057thm.jpg
e62c20cd8e7f3694dda55535be8664e3
aaddea130492268ea68a1a587951a1f5a0d8427b
30430 F20101204_AACPJO vidoz_m_Page_044.QC.jpg
22b2eac99d98c585513a526741eca0da
0a94f4605cc237da661e88fc0426f1cfd1297a22
8440 F20101204_AACPKE vidoz_m_Page_058thm.jpg
592e35324fc24028e61c32c869459ce3
23d46ab9d6ccabe29dcc35d4e719120ed685bf19
32329 F20101204_AACPJP vidoz_m_Page_045.QC.jpg
93185443ac1651ec45ea81ed4f885019
429487a5f345440962c2751abd8781a0f8f4a2f3
7030 F20101204_AACPKF vidoz_m_Page_059thm.jpg
cc66437a2dd89050c1142bc59ef2a241
8aee0bb11fb3d2cdee42125092e56bee7d531089
7878 F20101204_AACPJQ vidoz_m_Page_045thm.jpg
b24870be4584d5660f9135297f65690a
0552264e029c5311d4535d400174f777c75d2919
30089 F20101204_AACPJR vidoz_m_Page_046.QC.jpg
bf6454a2555b6f1869c96e170fc68e35
fb882c889ab79ea988b708de6f951c89c27cc9b2
27852 F20101204_AACPKG vidoz_m_Page_060.QC.jpg
d7fcef6ece962d03388342fb9cccb054
87620b4914e72c33d99f90128c73e724fbb2a5a6
32457 F20101204_AACPJS vidoz_m_Page_047.QC.jpg
f89d0f7330c3b8b3b71def29e7585ca5
11aed65ba5dccbe80870056f430f8606097f573d
20797 F20101204_AACPKH vidoz_m_Page_061.QC.jpg
3442117342e9c17f40ca33bf5eaec4a6
24501c8e83eb109ba75863690c949d7047aefd4f
32238 F20101204_AACPJT vidoz_m_Page_049.QC.jpg
39d8af7f4023b13841b7032f957d1e64
66ea5b989a4d4006783a8018b3e115429393c31b
5469 F20101204_AACPKI vidoz_m_Page_061thm.jpg
3bd978d283d9c1a6ef5bf032259fe096
f7b30e7fafb68ecc2cc609bd5772c6fa01c61dd3
8284 F20101204_AACPJU vidoz_m_Page_049thm.jpg
bd50764eeee74a87be2f531db6962bdd
eaa34104eb55f037bc695d222533f5a5e1c9405e
4954 F20101204_AACPKJ vidoz_m_Page_062thm.jpg
f0e88e7082d42236015892d5bcc2c0d0
7bd62239e648f3a12b375d41910b835ecc6fe342
8230 F20101204_AACPJV vidoz_m_Page_050thm.jpg
8f78639aeb58ba5a3528146d8cf769cf
8e0831cdd6e181184a80dab10d6e067f23a8c3b3
24327 F20101204_AACPKK vidoz_m_Page_063.QC.jpg
ae5bdae19484ed9e3e7cb2edbded5532
0d34f6c324fd55b91b8d303862d9022b257c87c3
8176 F20101204_AACPJW vidoz_m_Page_051thm.jpg
648b4f0d36fba38d4c194e87f1119dd9
21a834c3363837f68231d4b9e5a1a594c7e8ab75
31527 F20101204_AACPLA vidoz_m_Page_074.QC.jpg
14a297a2b5be5d6812c3f669d6e6f603
c75c100f34c214e6511c533c73282a52753ea7ae
6159 F20101204_AACPKL vidoz_m_Page_063thm.jpg
040fc3294f3657866d42369922151494
e22966b81608bc3e23fa9860baea6562404a23e0
34267 F20101204_AACPJX vidoz_m_Page_052.QC.jpg
ab807821e01853e03d4108c50086fabb
811fbff9654c8dec782cb305e43f621b50557c15
7863 F20101204_AACPLB vidoz_m_Page_074thm.jpg
a3c6c90781bc023e2e23844acd295bc7
a8181afd14462257c46a1ae078269eabde21c1c5
13208 F20101204_AACPKM vidoz_m_Page_064.QC.jpg
f009f0f0e64773dcebe21dbf6597dd2d
8ef13cc6228d50782c30b8bda5379d2862cc4225
8517 F20101204_AACPJY vidoz_m_Page_052thm.jpg
026e1bb8a1dffc421ca600f7a55f1728
235ec32ac082a1a20e60afeb064e92bdebe5cb6b
34978 F20101204_AACPLC vidoz_m_Page_075.QC.jpg
50d1f408b773b9370adea117485fa562
98fd69dd21d13d2d0787c7381a927beee0cfa4d8
3457 F20101204_AACPKN vidoz_m_Page_064thm.jpg
964e74fa2682267d279c54114c8d9769
7980c8e33a81033de917bfa20fb1dde082dec734
F20101204_AACPJZ vidoz_m_Page_053thm.jpg
d08e6347044d351c7a280c2abf4964f0
7b5fb1583c452db313f4d418f6beb7a16bc626ae
8703 F20101204_AACPLD vidoz_m_Page_075thm.jpg
b97ddfd8ed7c575e619c0c57f32bcd4f
305c6296aef28bbadf83e12fe838949130133f72
16510 F20101204_AACPKO vidoz_m_Page_066.QC.jpg
aaa70797083c6df989e51f2edf12ca4a
8a589d7d0a9bdf2114022e239b2f6fa551db5f10
8380 F20101204_AACPLE vidoz_m_Page_078thm.jpg
757a6420ecb680ab39993cc5fedceaef
d95141f763cd3df5372cb0a89f1557be2f601407
4678 F20101204_AACPKP vidoz_m_Page_066thm.jpg
6966a8703fd8c4f00fd38f0b573ae18b
6c7338f43862009fd5d305c96e186250a3ff7d12
35761 F20101204_AACPLF vidoz_m_Page_079.QC.jpg
121669d85a62200c3d9576f27bd13c88
c483a7b96dcfdb6603269aedf7915f35af5b6b53
4825 F20101204_AACPKQ vidoz_m_Page_067thm.jpg
7ddb1af80621b78edce00227dbf8a946
1cb0cb8784f0b9a8b1e94d066bac67563935640a
9041 F20101204_AACPLG vidoz_m_Page_079thm.jpg
4831501d7584395fde1ef1a136f91ce1
afb1765fc0af859de118e1ac5f2170a3f2e9cf26
16161 F20101204_AACPKR vidoz_m_Page_068.QC.jpg
11d4ab063e29e606017f776f15937980
7d0a35d40e2f6f1dd2b159d2ba740927a536e3f0
4999 F20101204_AACPKS vidoz_m_Page_068thm.jpg
7c44454acc13dde8ce604d3d23ae8c62
c8da94ae68c88831dfb16beac37870a8d637323d
8874 F20101204_AACPLH vidoz_m_Page_081thm.jpg
9b6995c4087c8b468679300f83422b6b
008112f069eb4d3518a65fb81a30b7e06583cf7a
4963 F20101204_AACPKT vidoz_m_Page_069thm.jpg
803853309b655ae5a3952ab14c474962
5e6e4048bd79f09320a1e40f452ddf12c3f5b48c
7974 F20101204_AACPLI vidoz_m_Page_082thm.jpg
15431c59b971c6726f4c37ffa08a479d
467a2c4215d2acab7f36ec15ed2563e86c51cf0b
15692 F20101204_AACPKU vidoz_m_Page_070.QC.jpg
ac72082db07287e579eb6ed8164ae600
493981e4b3daa6e91563540a7a3df558b2febc46
5480 F20101204_AACPLJ vidoz_m_Page_083thm.jpg
ca6419a3589ce6a061defc277a3a9183
075f7c40205fd2a2dbe9cbb9b2904ac66466bc7e
16358 F20101204_AACPKV vidoz_m_Page_071.QC.jpg
c876468bd398f9e4111e886ee8897b0f
c08c47c8401eadbb7680ee30b1a748859c0480b8
31994 F20101204_AACPLK vidoz_m_Page_084.QC.jpg
5b9677f2f1e51be6113fcef3047027f8
c806a842569d67ad358f4d32d3448e6e66f0dc76
5097 F20101204_AACPKW vidoz_m_Page_071thm.jpg
b1cad3a47a9cd5f8b45a6278db903c85
0dc11ad5e1e5ed02c9858ffe08897c5f8716c49d
15888 F20101204_AACPLL vidoz_m_Page_085.QC.jpg
a3070521af740244b03a8da438300a69
e11f73e20d13090f2a5f270c112c08e95e9b32ac
16658 F20101204_AACPKX vidoz_m_Page_072.QC.jpg
7b4d12571b8b33246e9f4a692b2b12a6
7686552314c14bfad0fb0cfdf0bc6ea7d967c1f6
5129 F20101204_AACPMA vidoz_m_Page_097thm.jpg
fdaec8aabd0a4c8a09694aff51148c06
60df68fef319af4f45517b9739d81bd49f0defdf
4945 F20101204_AACPLM vidoz_m_Page_085thm.jpg
a78f56ff929839129a726dc79404a64c
437bc1d12772bd020702e9c21eeb61aed55707c2
4903 F20101204_AACPKY vidoz_m_Page_072thm.jpg
c11c5d5d274e1b412394904727ebf0aa
60ec73d8161307ef9c149b870237ff021fee3379
2705 F20101204_AACPMB vidoz_m_Page_098thm.jpg
4e7933d68820dbbefac6a965bb0e7d84
ea2d4969200a9a97d2c1504f13e8257d596b3d25
8505 F20101204_AACPLN vidoz_m_Page_086.QC.jpg
c65d72c31a47a015808e3097282a83cc
2b7a86cd24501fc8a6d5257818ea27b980e4f424
4895 F20101204_AACPKZ vidoz_m_Page_073thm.jpg
6e2a6e399bd733068376f7c571fe50aa
513deb5af62f18f1a17ebb66a54a3513e17d0593
29762 F20101204_AACPMC vidoz_m_Page_099.QC.jpg
a31060cb51bc1634364f63191734ad70
3cbc19c5172f0bd5aa06bdc8a63cd488b8763a77
7601 F20101204_AACPMD vidoz_m_Page_099thm.jpg
8f59db1c40f86586429818750cfa7bd2
f00d9fa86a840f7fe6390e3fa4999ab5c77da58d
2761 F20101204_AACPLO vidoz_m_Page_086thm.jpg
30c47f648fd232e3832630b85d0d8fb4
ee24882321795c6466b92f5c26a3a5bfed67a4e7
38550 F20101204_AACPME vidoz_m_Page_100.QC.jpg
c8cd2498614fc4f9d1c94699d039ee52
870d9dd72fbb4f09dbb487e6e02da54c6d862437
29678 F20101204_AACPLP vidoz_m_Page_087.QC.jpg
a9faf61eed216f42cac3bf32d650e07d
f1829b4ba3d7a391c52cad8c8b4789f02ba7f453
8917 F20101204_AACPMF vidoz_m_Page_100thm.jpg
1957d97c2f1c49acf7f81668b703d222
5175800e1fa3026bca0aeea459b440fd450ae2b0
7817 F20101204_AACPLQ vidoz_m_Page_088thm.jpg
1ccfcaeec11f2658f73639370fda9f7c
32de7182a8f92df011f9132d44a64a74d630b271
8368 F20101204_AACPMG vidoz_m_Page_101thm.jpg
5c3a160f28e05e5b7c187b2850406e7c
426011ed761edf9a3fac00d34cce06bcddfe0472
6826 F20101204_AACPLR vidoz_m_Page_089thm.jpg
411065676c2692b8b105901564d3ba11
cf117662251c9462fc6bcc436a37bf81a71a9563
34418 F20101204_AACPMH vidoz_m_Page_102.QC.jpg
98fd4cd5c68ce615f4df90321cb7b1a9
95795904216b1fd1c87cbc367095d6798ffc208b
28274 F20101204_AACPLS vidoz_m_Page_090.QC.jpg
ad31e0ccb597ac73c0813baa88261b7a
ebf9b2f48a13d6940e21dfbbcefc031eaaf791d5
7316 F20101204_AACPLT vidoz_m_Page_090thm.jpg
f9f356ef89f3c860123220086f70b573
7452629bdb17f5c4cd5c3d997a3d7520f7fe9bff
8881 F20101204_AACPMI vidoz_m_Page_103thm.jpg
c5e382a0886bdca7c919942b035d3964
f5081f925ece436121d8e60d2707c839cba3c8be
6034 F20101204_AACPLU vidoz_m_Page_092thm.jpg
7fd21c5c455aa1468e97e26d8e16aec4
376fe400e4954fd286d8b93deab0320de8b26f19
407258 F20101204_AACOJH vidoz_m_Page_070.jp2
1b19314b9573ac1d7a2e562060738212
1cc38cfb43c4365d4d4233a34e71a419bdb5263b
34108 F20101204_AACPMJ vidoz_m_Page_104.QC.jpg
5328f7e815fec138a2745741c219b02b
9e486541bbb18d1a6691f319f1826955eacb60c3
23522 F20101204_AACPLV vidoz_m_Page_093.QC.jpg
e7674eec0797e290b8024fb1a7ff3f9f
2c8410908215dbd809f22da20a2bf5eff11bc46e
84290 F20101204_AACOJI vidoz_m_Page_059.jpg
66a606f3e21fdaf83429b42aca5975c5
f6790a10cc8a8cfc87698bd4607cb471d8502b0d
8676 F20101204_AACPMK vidoz_m_Page_105thm.jpg
811272b53126616271b758c7b9f5e4ef
42f0c5abc4fd1be50c8e4fd89c6617810c210d14
6245 F20101204_AACPLW vidoz_m_Page_093thm.jpg
8bf0f9189046986ee963ab62914de914
25b4c700711af4a77ac766ba6d0a9bc818ee3184
94366 F20101204_AACOJJ vidoz_m_Page_040.jpg
56a27944d3afd0637ec8526c015f546f
ecf2cedc68c03ceb9144deb6f576146674523ebc
34742 F20101204_AACPML vidoz_m_Page_106.QC.jpg
c915c01c419c6b091fcd192c5b88bd63
779c11752a0ec16be8817d060d127fe8042828eb
21139 F20101204_AACPLX vidoz_m_Page_094.QC.jpg
f499d4f4ba008b398ce686c27e2be1d5
d9a87d01048729215bd7d71f1e7e5946f98fe9e6
100418 F20101204_AACOJK vidoz_m_Page_016.jpg
990656640cd085af6afde77fe16a8600
93feec8781f56bbbda94472d0d77eebb70afa98f
896 F20101204_AACPMM vidoz_m_Page_107thm.jpg
d0f8c11cc265d46c42913f67a20a7caf
c08ab7e40687f3ce9c2613dac902b8c154aa8ee0
24218 F20101204_AACPLY vidoz_m_Page_095.QC.jpg
99c440b99646354649e0dc7dfe859726
50fee17027341b396bdb11d3c333a16089bd9bf9
8666 F20101204_AACOKA vidoz_m_Page_080thm.jpg
a5d8ae7eb43ac3b85cd23ed1818848fe
a50bfe01187d78c58ccf6181cc4d1a13a03e5d1a
33019 F20101204_AACOJL vidoz_m_Page_050.QC.jpg
46c760cc82617887fab260d2b10520d6
d003267117ad8eb03fc22f637b1296b435fb538e
4647 F20101204_AACPMN vidoz_m_Page_108thm.jpg
a8abaf130d46b5274c9c6a9ea346164c
a6e95db5d0a6b25121aadb5f58fcc98003a5d623
12974 F20101204_AACPLZ vidoz_m_Page_096.QC.jpg
ffff99eacf49d1f701fe8bb3979dd9f6
517c756db53aa5b5eb8b231a539b2e1eb54c01e9
36065 F20101204_AACOKB vidoz_m_Page_077.QC.jpg
6e396424a0c2447366b347e550a23dde
f6e631d0338a1a598df5fe5a329a2ad0ce3abb2c
F20101204_AACOJM vidoz_m_Page_005.tif
bc01a9ce795130166052880bf0a780ee
c66e2246a2ad694d4100aa8227f5f1a91fcdb12f
125080 F20101204_AACOKC UFE0017881_00001.mets
35cceb84cc8052fa294c05c4befb1448
e74d96a9f7f3d876042ff15f05ff8ffd58091143
5581 F20101204_AACOJN vidoz_m_Page_094thm.jpg
a85cfa88b3cb8ad30aa96c4c72419f99
219662abf1c99d6de1a22ee68fdec1abf46b04f6
22603 F20101204_AACOJO vidoz_m_Page_092.QC.jpg
3114e989e08b74d54fd83cc5fa25a374
6cedcf963ca9478133250c91d4556260b10de778
967 F20101204_AACOJP vidoz_m_Page_042.txt
5cb36058071ac82db8fff0c2fc03d156
2abe79665578c35e8c663b6a05289612ac214068
24587 F20101204_AACOKF vidoz_m_Page_001.jpg
4cfa7dbb6abeb213159a872becb6072e
5753372f8a6ac4db6f6254740595531bacea799f
8308 F20101204_AACOJQ vidoz_m_Page_102thm.jpg
bad3053f5ea9fbb6e932a2dd7901b0b5
fbc2cab7e80b1df7283d46171ae331c3e41eed47
4870 F20101204_AACOKG vidoz_m_Page_002.jpg
3cb9a37cb575301c51ab365c40223112
4b8752b983885fc6200f64965d2907cf680e6726
2021 F20101204_AACOJR vidoz_m_Page_052.txt
9286c7bc2287d26ab3179fd685775899
db97870323a62ad849ff0bd7c3fd658b6aa585f7
7575 F20101204_AACOJS vidoz_m_Page_043.QC.jpg
bc40fed056de7f9eef5d3fb85f6fb205
b59857793ba3d5ff293a3fa300449ee5838d1eb2
5748 F20101204_AACOKH vidoz_m_Page_003.jpg
d0bba91455ffd7a59c9dacf7d3f8bc41
5e4a06d9f415e87aaf727f2a13218f502992247d
7521 F20101204_AACOJT vidoz_m_Page_086.pro
f2a3c0bcc535f4c50599fcdf4ddf8e8a
14f09bec9fd1f25d61c11fe0ea8c94ef18a17aa2
73816 F20101204_AACOKI vidoz_m_Page_004.jpg
21df8975be3e977b6480665ebaa866c5
37d2dea0943a8b6789ecd118d3805c1d3c6aae96
52467 F20101204_AACOJU vidoz_m_Page_056.pro
d2ce9015ee0b2ffa64a2eecf6328c009
227d03e982314102608be5b1c679979370cd27c8
99709 F20101204_AACOKJ vidoz_m_Page_005.jpg
29a0df2c8370cd46532f4f73b73bd978
237eb02486778ede369d45e784cbee6c4d5c5573
108143 F20101204_AACOJV vidoz_m_Page_084.jpg
ab771a7489743fe021deaad688383188
1d7c7a0e83510b36d4193a461209413b52018e69
113250 F20101204_AACOKK vidoz_m_Page_006.jpg
0ae4358f86c28eef2ae9481842e76286
dc209dc45bb8dbb0298595d7538032ac361fa90d
34306 F20101204_AACOJW vidoz_m_Page_105.QC.jpg
98f6d50aed282abb6f4b397f11ddad66
19fde529864995423b947eee9d286c343fc9d770
129041 F20101204_AACOKL vidoz_m_Page_007.jpg
c2bf381e6e6540592047e7d72e6785f1
045c89fce54b34aaf8c0e236a1d20d8eb06811da
31658 F20101204_AACOJX vidoz_m_Page_082.QC.jpg
ca6661875b05a9aa431303fbc466e0b9
40575db844844cef303b683a6c13b67cb32294f7
107111 F20101204_AACOLA vidoz_m_Page_023.jpg
1d0d43df0f1eb1810ed6942a5c32169b
40a7bea694277792255e3a096f115792ad85ccef
160599 F20101204_AACOKM vidoz_m_Page_008.jpg
c95be8e9cc64f34cb79e334601e250e1
4b05a8c7d600d0bde21ca4e3e36d26f1772ab4bb
1975 F20101204_AACOJY vidoz_m_Page_011.txt
ae2ded80572adf7f2606309545509907
f0e9f02956426c8f05b0974f067bd89ad4725bbf
99331 F20101204_AACOLB vidoz_m_Page_024.jpg
9af9871783d0a5121b8e2a63c5dce358
222c952f770cc241dbe266ef61a778bd1ca1f6a3
32658 F20101204_AACOKN vidoz_m_Page_009.jpg
9a61cb54832423188267c5c565a4f3b3
a6ba8b2eaa710e2549ffc614e0f1ded6170292bd
24436 F20101204_AACOJZ vidoz_m_Page_043.jpg
44e98efd11e61987bb66919ba383c634
8561dea15f2eb77c1bdbae3c907eae1b76de0627
100900 F20101204_AACOLC vidoz_m_Page_025.jpg
f4467a1e0a2f49be540df1ddd683a1fe
fb8676508db18cd0214361e150429c40f88100a2
126164 F20101204_AACOKO vidoz_m_Page_010.jpg
417ca44ffd5d9a2b38e9afd0bab04e40
572b8790674b35fa5bcbc3250f3158932bdb73a8
99306 F20101204_AACOLD vidoz_m_Page_026.jpg
f8ba539309a656248a7b97571c084a63
51350ba5d41746e2a0ee1c713be2b6e83f13bc6b
104299 F20101204_AACOKP vidoz_m_Page_011.jpg
200d76a790a62e6d5f70c98d716e853d
47493197445cd22d5ba2b9ac4fe7978a88bf6f20
96419 F20101204_AACOLE vidoz_m_Page_027.jpg
bc69ac9e909c47938cba574c8419037c
6cdabec0ce59f69e99d85beed7ca627f618069ef
83334 F20101204_AACOKQ vidoz_m_Page_012.jpg
b8c127d5660604f819931577769212b3
1e15c526cbd08462dc7ee267847eed384b779e0d
107355 F20101204_AACOLF vidoz_m_Page_028.jpg
6bf4b7ff6da66b34c0a9c01752e3dd97
1351a07bb1029cc44c1a9d2b43043d03a7f93035
93046 F20101204_AACOKR vidoz_m_Page_013.jpg
139f58a69e9e5592c0c039b0976f7eb4
e2bd6802fef7dc3f7c5e521cc2314aa18e656f39
38787 F20101204_AACOLG vidoz_m_Page_029.jpg
1e5fd822f358d7e45079acbd86efcc36
a962c1aecc4ab8fde786cf4f099167be9c8cf6f7
91213 F20101204_AACOKS vidoz_m_Page_014.jpg
1ece550e019824163189aacc12d619fc
2d86e6891d5e75770be1751c845e8860e4d47528
84361 F20101204_AACOLH vidoz_m_Page_030.jpg
29cb0ae202ba04e8499cb0339a4ba11f
a719f9f2b5f73a2be12016bee2fe42eb3daf95e9
102400 F20101204_AACOKT vidoz_m_Page_015.jpg
ef99ef0cd255a233694a6d3adfbf13f3
702d9aad05345a41aa028de46b324b3b2e12a862
74367 F20101204_AACOKU vidoz_m_Page_017.jpg
88564a3c7af0da1fcc0d4815a6d7a9a1
36e2c0ef18e4ad8c436e6b10a44ca6b834f075b1
103731 F20101204_AACOLI vidoz_m_Page_031.jpg
d6c0847400e69ec4ff2e17bd33698e10
919eb72bde41dad58c13af81655f8bc6a335e8a4
90458 F20101204_AACOKV vidoz_m_Page_018.jpg
1b985746a0c055f9f3bf2d108a6b0da2
379af5a9887affd10c61775acf314074a3bbea63
51318 F20101204_AACOLJ vidoz_m_Page_032.jpg
3d34701ceafac6a1cd50d83aa9f200d7
afb91012682934150694bac5d0d06bc84b144afd
102140 F20101204_AACOKW vidoz_m_Page_019.jpg
f948eeef45934fbb89faf8f344b47080
692d592d60d9252db29a48c6cc365560923b5104
53435 F20101204_AACOLK vidoz_m_Page_033.jpg
59874998e1996f274a98a4c5dcf995cf
9e5acf94d2ac1d56e92bb4caf50e746711a38498
103767 F20101204_AACOKX vidoz_m_Page_020.jpg
cf257f00b08e3279356d30f87797175a
a1f43292c945462a8d14074e3386d0f35a19ab74
101700 F20101204_AACOMA vidoz_m_Page_051.jpg
48c35d4b772f874a71ff4f502a16c480
b89b21c0d36bad3a4a3699c2f8f182461c5978c3
95649 F20101204_AACOLL vidoz_m_Page_034.jpg
8410e243eef33569c978196c3b6f2840
0aabddd02266386837b11bfc37322ddab9641568
105849 F20101204_AACOKY vidoz_m_Page_021.jpg
11b1a92d0a97a0df65c16cb172f6ac75
c7d1e903e2fe1048836831b97199ef17b121d045
105713 F20101204_AACOMB vidoz_m_Page_052.jpg
9f80fe97d66c301aed6eadc6cc2e6476
0e56d4b75ddccef7f21045b76f4d9580467dae08
99636 F20101204_AACOLM vidoz_m_Page_035.jpg
e94e9316a13dacd8bb8515bcfc3d00a9
e91c234d549c37c6800107e9e5a41bbf9f4a4309
107992 F20101204_AACOKZ vidoz_m_Page_022.jpg
58ef711bad8da44e239cc489f9b29765
3093b7e0c9044d3c1efe3999b491acc0575dcfa8
105509 F20101204_AACOMC vidoz_m_Page_053.jpg
01043defea5c4c633e1520123055142c
2f86ecaf17f75e770b6ce605d4d93d0c60e59ff2
92443 F20101204_AACOLN vidoz_m_Page_036.jpg
9388eb0fa1c90a7af08fdf88f96fddff
4d681d013cf1cb521c2eca6b3646ccd6e137a096
102522 F20101204_AACOMD vidoz_m_Page_054.jpg
45bb70d294cf281098847b084228cfb0
8f64ba7573aecc43800713f232c70b04a2ee6bef
105150 F20101204_AACOLO vidoz_m_Page_037.jpg
acf023c3c8f5196c2d4a4079a6b8b41b
2158c3fc28dc2c77dfb2fe19379645b230504135
103036 F20101204_AACOME vidoz_m_Page_055.jpg
654df5f011b6198827a807278636bcd8
9e1fa06ce9eb3bd8a4c1b607d556205fac6e6cee
94582 F20101204_AACOLP vidoz_m_Page_038.jpg
f80902aba6213779d42c54849b33f9e0
3d3875479bb806aa520c2364cd7295ac059f4bdf
108230 F20101204_AACOMF vidoz_m_Page_056.jpg
a148d0a343c5e55f74849d55c023c974
fa423087ead32ec2f64a625752b871eaaaa1d171
102188 F20101204_AACOLQ vidoz_m_Page_039.jpg
44e90ff26064bb157bbbc0155f2b545c
7bd8a44d53670d250c9ec35016e9ef7de92cb728
100506 F20101204_AACOMG vidoz_m_Page_057.jpg
ad0cd94b19fbc114b1fde74b51cd2f58
803ff2a58a67369917fad30c201b90082ab7665a
12531 F20101204_AACOLR vidoz_m_Page_041.jpg
082ae0e0f8da82dab2eb6e206a50852d
fbeb9aa6af1a7f716519145e0aad71c7151c0b46
106375 F20101204_AACOMH vidoz_m_Page_058.jpg
28f6eea366b9a0323fd9bfa80f710b0e
d7f2d10dedb438b6d72cd9eee3e86bdf90c85202
52179 F20101204_AACOLS vidoz_m_Page_042.jpg
d731ad7881f22c988737cf0d1559b2f5
c50d8faaf165d2f9b66492bdb934ebb3b0e0817f
96612 F20101204_AACOMI vidoz_m_Page_060.jpg
3c97a706ac3702b385bb9605a51b81cb
78da29c2a7939bfc205b123fb0ed5f0fe9c85433
95691 F20101204_AACOLT vidoz_m_Page_044.jpg
67cc8917a514d921c0ed01c5ab3fd8f5
123b909cca94721864d1bed39720e4414bbbf5ec
97460 F20101204_AACOLU vidoz_m_Page_045.jpg
f6475a008eafc076faafc627dbad2c83
56be25c5d4122ba612dbc940b318eed07ac733fa
72355 F20101204_AACOMJ vidoz_m_Page_061.jpg
479d257f89d8c24c5c8c9a4b086d4b7b
ac0273b8a8b3cb5a40ac4817e6fa273732ed3223
91219 F20101204_AACOLV vidoz_m_Page_046.jpg
39b0382a7966790308a28b23507d8aa1
802246df3590d8d7a216299a1bed37da894670cf
67100 F20101204_AACOMK vidoz_m_Page_062.jpg
b2776fd780c28c2c7fd6d635a6f24919
c9009a14213f0c2c337627ea64cad6275ad94b40
100769 F20101204_AACOLW vidoz_m_Page_047.jpg
3659d46620ed656b9641215291220830
ae9be6a66c8976e4d53992aa6f98c96ca76ed5e7
104362 F20101204_AACONA vidoz_m_Page_078.jpg
9810b617bf66da5a2e1e6a4588f80058
420f96dcb57e0256e1b257a66325a7f7d8233fc1
79426 F20101204_AACOML vidoz_m_Page_063.jpg
e3e2b02ef9462a9d7f123e2b58f6461d
48297e0bfba0926d01ceb56e693f49aa2ccf9c57
98052 F20101204_AACOLX vidoz_m_Page_048.jpg
acd248dfa002a572f8c717dfb5707d98
a889f7ab4b933c8eddde4278c6223da5c5044ee1
42102 F20101204_AACOMM vidoz_m_Page_064.jpg
6b18d0343a27521fa4bf90f6dadc98df
abd19700efaeab94a3d6d69d296740585153c883
98720 F20101204_AACOLY vidoz_m_Page_049.jpg
aec273374f11d8905b110d4d56be48bd
8d33c9c1eb18707560b48799712b8b9a6363b82e
113193 F20101204_AACONB vidoz_m_Page_079.jpg
f22bdb349cd0f199d1e1a59792e5a2a6
3baccf9ad9116643b6863d87d75517ba30170f71
95102 F20101204_AACOMN vidoz_m_Page_065.jpg
d5c1a3fccf437c47b8c19751f2680c9a
ce33fe7e1730045e9877331c7c5d1c167583a8c8
102319 F20101204_AACOLZ vidoz_m_Page_050.jpg
3d54c47303e3abbf684686fc1242b9c2
401c36352e77e6574c084910ed66b57e23250bd2
112853 F20101204_AACONC vidoz_m_Page_080.jpg
61d212d9db148f7f9096ea8ebf1fe756
5eb79f3ed555a3881242379c243b8d3f081158b0
48297 F20101204_AACOMO vidoz_m_Page_066.jpg
8eab001dc56afcb5c6582894cb3771d8
115c0eda73c809c4211af69845a83bc2d3544b29
108550 F20101204_AACOND vidoz_m_Page_081.jpg
ca9a5ba56413df42f19b604275a0635e
9befb447559af0a2aeb63a4eb3207760bd5de50a
44329 F20101204_AACOMP vidoz_m_Page_067.jpg
4aa0aabfdd627fcdb01291b5dae8fd3b
9dd53890a41b1d835468dddf6545dd0b1e9416d5
97016 F20101204_AACONE vidoz_m_Page_082.jpg
0c3ea9f96ae967f6dd6d80a7dd805db3
5f26c475346f6b375f24be8af9bd07085f864a90
51513 F20101204_AACOMQ vidoz_m_Page_068.jpg
95558c36032b2586e38c61d24d4b6ad5
4193bff834519984df2c9ce19bd46ed1be230c6f
73351 F20101204_AACONF vidoz_m_Page_083.jpg
e095f12da979b9a5f33423bfae7b6eb3
f40deae0137ed854ebeada546774a83c259d94f5
45666 F20101204_AACOMR vidoz_m_Page_069.jpg
af61538a85bbbae5ef1179e2c7fb1c7a
e8b55b99cbad7e010e80030ef5cd954779ad603b
48830 F20101204_AACONG vidoz_m_Page_085.jpg
296e01a3a80a28fe76847ce531738195
cf154dbb8c0dbc5f40f1638be76681da46d5e693
46111 F20101204_AACOMS vidoz_m_Page_070.jpg
04d97e7717bd58f4ad98734b6a29daf9
5f0ac219f0972df49f7e5936fd48d116f0b4a7a7
25792 F20101204_AACONH vidoz_m_Page_086.jpg
d7cc5dfbf6faec25911095061af67239
1f94acac457435f42598295607494fb5101d6534
49390 F20101204_AACOMT vidoz_m_Page_071.jpg
6d7bc9f83d20caf399081bfbac235951
87aa994b3bf17cb405fb25295ea26588d21ddcae
92339 F20101204_AACONI vidoz_m_Page_087.jpg
178d793347322c564be3dbd6413fb120
a2139c261c710d51b2d3ba600b08cf8e33f77355
47442 F20101204_AACOMU vidoz_m_Page_072.jpg
55a8e38add4637bdae35679105c69306
e085b4aaded040df5a96b90c057ee1bcf8c58396
92141 F20101204_AACONJ vidoz_m_Page_088.jpg
c72a9864cf56598bb77c596cf78a6e7b
c4fe14859da5cd02850ec52a8b94e0a5b8d47dee
49843 F20101204_AACOMV vidoz_m_Page_073.jpg
a47a167de1fbb19151e61f6581a2dd38
16d10e6c9bcbab155831d1205ec8a2752c1f0b6f
99198 F20101204_AACOMW vidoz_m_Page_074.jpg
ce4a1ea3884c14d0fcc784ac04180dba
7ffe2d236ca74033fc559f928b1a98596f9b3de4
78728 F20101204_AACONK vidoz_m_Page_089.jpg
009a87adcb6c18429173aef1caab9d18
066eb690a834adc437f7be0c3abd8bc3dc5c638d
104334 F20101204_AACOMX vidoz_m_Page_075.jpg
2c2da4d817bbefd2d134cb5eea8d5764
7c41e1f1e1ee8e3b900db0300202904fe4ac1a6b
121799 F20101204_AACOOA vidoz_m_Page_105.jpg
8b48d3ae0be421b2b2fa40e4b90759c5
d565150c37cc9ba1637d3a20a3fd8f6d9bf99baf
93030 F20101204_AACONL vidoz_m_Page_090.jpg
df9854173d17c7d3c61657cb387f98be
fa1839beb071357c4a200fe44e40788c7cb99777
98033 F20101204_AACOMY vidoz_m_Page_076.jpg
dc50990002ae4549eb29af684ef4cd7c
59035a4c9f3d63a6f30e26dd524f1bc2aa9481d5
125534 F20101204_AACOOB vidoz_m_Page_106.jpg
90fc219f0a8de6f772819ae7112b7035
68e452b8bc1aaa191c90aaae8ea40241fdc61c2f
85113 F20101204_AACONM vidoz_m_Page_091.jpg
7f0dfe64ae7b5f9b30806262d95d3a6b
a98230adb02097d75da86a189f790eb10ad046ac
110333 F20101204_AACOMZ vidoz_m_Page_077.jpg
e65f66fa3952ff9b2b069e83219dbca0
eb0e2bee4fbc564d5e8b8c6db6e4992f0f9ba762
9434 F20101204_AACOOC vidoz_m_Page_107.jpg
84da3869408eeaf9792edd02caf745a5
2b7b742b2c5c5cf88db46cb93cca585e5058ea47
72835 F20101204_AACONN vidoz_m_Page_092.jpg
0a285bcdb75062fbbfb0fae1e2c0cf7e
f43ba7e7f86bae3a86601e1ece7932ff2b46d263
54451 F20101204_AACOOD vidoz_m_Page_108.jpg
74d777837210177c011544e4c17719a9
fe138dffeab417a207fe28335c51ca00ff3cbfd5
79666 F20101204_AACONO vidoz_m_Page_093.jpg
1b24c7e197c0aa05ee8ec956c2b3413c
1ed9951cc965912415f7e94c4a563cb2855f68a4
25090 F20101204_AACOOE vidoz_m_Page_001.jp2
1c72115d954a92140800ff84b9cbfa30
7ff10755ad2072c21fac6af5cbd6e131452483e5
74067 F20101204_AACONP vidoz_m_Page_094.jpg
b75e3e7f51808bdba850e62fea470af6
d627ff662e76d32d81ef6d390376cc327a005ed2
5780 F20101204_AACOOF vidoz_m_Page_002.jp2
8cc74c7ad36bf1c78bbd1fca17bb1418
d0b2bb92c97da9454e03c10e23f071b2ff7e0c99
80593 F20101204_AACONQ vidoz_m_Page_095.jpg
b6bda8abd20dc3dcd68eaeaf0982a4a8
0737d55a0747486fc94db520148934897592653b
6545 F20101204_AACOOG vidoz_m_Page_003.jp2
70aa81baf79effd4bda9bc3d46c82b52
79b150e6087bf24bcb081653c404e6b9a27cda89
44361 F20101204_AACONR vidoz_m_Page_096.jpg
5415ab2b10ad082d781f02b7fd08e522
e1106c075980b4c96fa08c817b62a79a6fb5e497
77475 F20101204_AACOOH vidoz_m_Page_004.jp2
a5f8afdb9e783e4adc33734fba964b00
6c5bd66360750958124c9ed8718fa48a79753810
49196 F20101204_AACONS vidoz_m_Page_097.jpg
66d6505621e593c0bb719cdd0fff0ced
b4d0568a66cfd04792c91ff456999cc3b3e77715
1051979 F20101204_AACOOI vidoz_m_Page_005.jp2
1a444de2075205baa131c1c284d818b6
ec5c3a125f449a283977ccce652050e828b531c4
27345 F20101204_AACONT vidoz_m_Page_098.jpg
004dd956b5592b92c4f4a6d484000772
d525888910b8c0c9521621f3c27d4f84e8aa37c9
1051972 F20101204_AACOOJ vidoz_m_Page_006.jp2
1691e29a9d9a6871d8112554d86ff73c
2007098fd382e772880ebaede8fb3349476da70d
106812 F20101204_AACONU vidoz_m_Page_099.jpg
ba6a38a8d32d9466e26606ce86d99ff4
47c7d12145dfb975a3c93c0cbc1cb657c0cbfae0
1051982 F20101204_AACOOK vidoz_m_Page_007.jp2
cf8e26f1117202330b6604aae175948f
9cc21f949a7329bfc468e1d542fcb8a297a64822
140669 F20101204_AACONV vidoz_m_Page_100.jpg
f7d0f267c6eadd052bd4c17432c28c45
d9a73f3ce7aebdee17b3f7a9b89f48a3888a7c56
127067 F20101204_AACONW vidoz_m_Page_101.jpg
3878ad5f40a9c237b3225418e59df9c5
ebad7cb10e5decc27392d2cf1b4a96548410690f
113967 F20101204_AACOPA vidoz_m_Page_023.jp2
d58ba2e36cf64943b986b80c73fcfb37
3f117f8f262f5e6764fd35d580aee65cde7e50cd
1051969 F20101204_AACOOL vidoz_m_Page_008.jp2
8542de521232ddff790d7b5d8d800972
7488a9798b711e14ab2a9ed79ea204aa9a5ccd01
125143 F20101204_AACONX vidoz_m_Page_102.jpg
abac651d413f9b0839acf01f125e0f06
d8c6952b28a457c7e9364c77427413a941b200ff
107082 F20101204_AACOPB vidoz_m_Page_024.jp2
c4d501de90bcaa79b42247f9594b3e38
da739d0099b4764658b0db619b7510b163e206a6
547823 F20101204_AACOOM vidoz_m_Page_009.jp2
641818a32c0f4a2940c3b7a461ed0876
2d92b7611e316461ddeb2c01d0133c9de7b57525
131025 F20101204_AACONY vidoz_m_Page_103.jpg
268e12df42e76ae84d1a16d329deb78d
1c483b4fef50751af650ec25148797a15f0e8c38
107743 F20101204_AACOPC vidoz_m_Page_025.jp2
d20ad240c388cbc90eeb7274c2703712
f6febad7458eca6aa33a1c98b579b2185359488b
1051947 F20101204_AACOON vidoz_m_Page_010.jp2
3a4bdc9e95fa20c70595a8097a9ebbc4
5ba222cbd21076f43b597333b73a53c68168653a
120590 F20101204_AACONZ vidoz_m_Page_104.jpg
5156a3a848facf30000c78fec4da9607
c102df4cf4d67651fd0d3bc7137de55cbde7c078
106434 F20101204_AACOPD vidoz_m_Page_026.jp2
02169a3104657739fa6b62ca51167505
66665c7506b71f10438e5c97448f37c2257984ff
1051965 F20101204_AACOOO vidoz_m_Page_011.jp2
4e20460247f7f2ddb96532b8f7e8a2b2
1a71ae56a9719696965a1e2b7b779c2d5e2416ee
105262 F20101204_AACOPE vidoz_m_Page_027.jp2
a571872826ff309c4ca3a4d144de50e8
6a04364ab7ba4a3b9e3bc7646d955cdc2645b9f2
88955 F20101204_AACOOP vidoz_m_Page_012.jp2
63c57637cf514bdc47242d50b0bf03e5
e0af78e48c8f22b2164edb7d067d9401bb7195c2
115137 F20101204_AACOPF vidoz_m_Page_028.jp2
20239497a321655f586c625e44ac9688
29e570f53bad255d97098b5c683d8503e0118bb2
100144 F20101204_AACOOQ vidoz_m_Page_013.jp2
a10bc9d69707f3f7e73a45ba78866cf4
715f1866bcf3ca78f315c67a86d7e5303b782950
42191 F20101204_AACOPG vidoz_m_Page_029.jp2
b6b4bcf5b24918b1d1f5567bd19b2d11
00e0a4021cddb041c80780b1290f25421cf6de40
97883 F20101204_AACOOR vidoz_m_Page_014.jp2
d2e9581b41bfbe5cf7b8ad5086e51423
3d8d791ce9a028fc491e9af4d4a3b24d09e525ad
88668 F20101204_AACOPH vidoz_m_Page_030.jp2
214a78b5212cc2fe8be3fc8643e3234f
1ebbc82d462f981721fe9e169c0881e080ce454a
110743 F20101204_AACOOS vidoz_m_Page_015.jp2
7da60fca7aa1767fbf6b9da1ee14e966
4b9cd0230bba7a6cf7f4a14b1b638b18e0b3f6b7
108163 F20101204_AACOPI vidoz_m_Page_031.jp2
7f70798e8ee43274f140851ceadb48ed
5a5921ab01e3274927d195c9fc99dbaf505e1ba8
107298 F20101204_AACOOT vidoz_m_Page_016.jp2
b7a5aa17bb1dc77339e7ea4aadf39e02
51e7b7b74f8253e8d1cc7bbf7ba79928bbd02f68
53810 F20101204_AACOPJ vidoz_m_Page_032.jp2
0cee749cea72edbf8cee81cea6a88a19
358111dff636e16abadb2e75b0095e57d50b2abe
80432 F20101204_AACOOU vidoz_m_Page_017.jp2
7849effe80420990104ede8de8c42338
81f369cd8cdccd0b4738f4b0399825187c71727d
55556 F20101204_AACOPK vidoz_m_Page_033.jp2
d419e6155118ae6a12669593b919af94
f2c563710a22adb0f4addba040d82e311fab0026
96597 F20101204_AACOOV vidoz_m_Page_018.jp2
02eb31e39a6facb47b43ebcd59ef2590
6f8cb1d78dd37995e7bd64fd6c08e6a8289252f3
102283 F20101204_AACOPL vidoz_m_Page_034.jp2
459a71128146ca378e97b658874587a3
adaaa370a3e555186763730e53e092562186ceef
110592 F20101204_AACOOW vidoz_m_Page_019.jp2
f6d7046ca49537b6d331836599ef5372
3c9835e97c689e0d31f0471357815ed3852bef0b
112098 F20101204_AACOOX vidoz_m_Page_020.jp2
2fa060678a9d6c82973381ef93cddcee
e8d5abd9684d260868547b40c268f9d7610c7d51
106064 F20101204_AACOQA vidoz_m_Page_049.jp2
fc651e7a32e8705f7c41b72343aa89ea
acf70d1f9d634cb4dec809f866a4af09d9ae6517
109154 F20101204_AACOPM vidoz_m_Page_035.jp2
7a38003ae763bf3ca0b3035bf4023112
28233a3fe4d9298dfb3161dc313fa0db69a59d8f
115271 F20101204_AACOOY vidoz_m_Page_021.jp2
e00740452cf43a111b78bfa5af92f9da
382ec3f789c2f0b47ed4e8e299ed2da9dcfddac6
109634 F20101204_AACOQB vidoz_m_Page_050.jp2
f5af7d326755571e7731b11f20b30389
43530b2048add140769058a9e89f6f655d91bb9b
99560 F20101204_AACOPN vidoz_m_Page_036.jp2
b1d74d329f27c773bdf546dd12e63551
8a8ab4c22d378fde8df3cc41e26c13113c87dd91
114411 F20101204_AACOOZ vidoz_m_Page_022.jp2
1ab7c9a5d80f5bf13f4f406baa185257
ad4e1f7df82ba53a673dabd71f94fc38b58b7d74
107858 F20101204_AACOQC vidoz_m_Page_051.jp2
b93aa360414cd08ac6ad86a3b6dc6626
f04ad561ad75aa51b6857946ccbb04b5cc21afa5
110428 F20101204_AACOPO vidoz_m_Page_037.jp2
d73706884e380cf42b98b4a182bf07a9
a0fe06388f6e7c29b11ac068160770f6409797f5
113241 F20101204_AACOQD vidoz_m_Page_052.jp2
98bf07ccfef3977d5366d1a885805a97
5aa46641798ae5f20bc1109832fb611b4627790c
100261 F20101204_AACOPP vidoz_m_Page_038.jp2
c9d210ccd5f04ade5547c2ab58482b40
1f3f0fe2b4da4fd62ae55a8caadbcebc52839bec
111439 F20101204_AACOQE vidoz_m_Page_053.jp2
3de5ea1b4352849ee3f35c26793ae778
dfb16dee74409a21240f6c61ebeae810c9bb0d3e
109645 F20101204_AACOPQ vidoz_m_Page_039.jp2
eb0e315a5f751a3bdfc93b76ac110a2f
a60a440c7ceef9378394e4ba68ba947c904154bc
107629 F20101204_AACOQF vidoz_m_Page_054.jp2
ee314b0852b878fca4cad53a66a84655
a2a7661c7563af40c720837c4bcfdea54163ad82
102093 F20101204_AACOPR vidoz_m_Page_040.jp2
795a2c848b3a42cc5f081534eafd3991
55acd8689bc547f2df146cfc97912d82b42caeb2
108887 F20101204_AACOQG vidoz_m_Page_055.jp2
9c43cc25d62edb6ab23a246a454e81b5
4a944167110ecc1c8733e3cc97cc1e6bfa4c47e8
13315 F20101204_AACOPS vidoz_m_Page_041.jp2
e9caa42b431ef9411063c7550f5a4c93
e16bfb08cc130f36c332c68a58d1b9c77ce23dfd
114177 F20101204_AACOQH vidoz_m_Page_056.jp2
1e9b4bb4e3e00c6567bc91a196a2b4a5
7efcb7adad5d11c9df82928af514db859eda2954
53465 F20101204_AACOPT vidoz_m_Page_042.jp2
9152da2d8cce6aac95f89842884a6807
ab615ae527e22f902086f6aa94197845bdbaca2d
107887 F20101204_AACOQI vidoz_m_Page_057.jp2
9242fc0d44a3c603e4bd5b60aff24271
8161da34871f596940936d53b766eb1c471e5641
288897 F20101204_AACOPU vidoz_m_Page_043.jp2
ac89ca80f20a149ec537647152a1d9d5
05ff6d4fa45a0729f57cc6bc1924745c3f17651b
111963 F20101204_AACOQJ vidoz_m_Page_058.jp2
3597643b4471348b211dc4694a9f6d4a
02df70e3db3a3fb4dfeb4fe1f5b6b4562fa1d167
101315 F20101204_AACOPV vidoz_m_Page_044.jp2
7a39e51587290ca2555bf3fdc9e425fb
511652367bfc36fa61d75cf5e2d2f4b79bf6d210
89997 F20101204_AACOQK vidoz_m_Page_059.jp2
39ac3451894b4b96000c92ec92a0459b
8881b05174f5248d5d19563e2128f3843de3093a
106045 F20101204_AACOPW vidoz_m_Page_045.jp2
c2ba10a5fcf28aea3c2c76067a676eeb
7a887015d233ea608b4287707cf7d322f3a57fee
95903 F20101204_AACOQL vidoz_m_Page_060.jp2
4f580ed89aed955058851f2fed50c49a
8202af671c2d35e1a3957a16e52110e5927b848d
97714 F20101204_AACOPX vidoz_m_Page_046.jp2
45afaaf5422103a87ac6eab853ed6d05
b8af55dd93ae0b623b2a7862c30930b80cc19ecb
103766 F20101204_AACORA vidoz_m_Page_076.jp2
7a5adfbaba861f9876954c816feac058
5f6272b5373bfd90961704d774e903871bdaffc0
72563 F20101204_AACOQM vidoz_m_Page_061.jp2
9042b5afab60c56959968d76d115ad07
d6613772e171d6f1a0472e88a154896b895f3013
106594 F20101204_AACOPY vidoz_m_Page_047.jp2
998644100ccd7c52086442bb8b573d51
594834c344ac01ad190a9628224b2adb001c0e76
116944 F20101204_AACORB vidoz_m_Page_077.jp2
980bd3a1c04122df4c6bc425932e5655
4923899d73717d0b68a8f2ed8e843e9c84647bec
112593 F20101204_AACORC vidoz_m_Page_078.jp2
a742ae77d62fb7b875b3c9f2eca5d3a4
590c2b5e5dd9fb5641030f9d5f698b1dc66ee9c3
66556 F20101204_AACOQN vidoz_m_Page_062.jp2
f564f40848f2ebd317e0c09f64f33ac9
965fc895a5cd980567950a2ea867beb0773a311e
103868 F20101204_AACOPZ vidoz_m_Page_048.jp2
cabf1ea99b8b1571d61e59fba329404e
30bb87b7c108c15e486c38ccecac38a7ce6bbc1a
117578 F20101204_AACORD vidoz_m_Page_079.jp2
fcfac4aaeef73e4989cfacce9d08218a
319e02c8323808c7ed3a353d599c3c0eb6841160
79173 F20101204_AACOQO vidoz_m_Page_063.jp2
77d427d888ce7089869040ee2bbd1581
6038461e86ee683c18da2ca1482f054b9b18d09e
120151 F20101204_AACORE vidoz_m_Page_080.jp2
9fab45b59260148e75c21c2d93b5a648
02e55b2de5e36f2df705b914e58a80390d7a5352
41577 F20101204_AACOQP vidoz_m_Page_064.jp2
fb558bbb70577ca746bb365819f7712e
09ba32b8333814a0f27c8fce9a4efad6f89eae53
116122 F20101204_AACORF vidoz_m_Page_081.jp2
9ba8e7a02c9744702fffe430008ad872
fcdcc7213adcf4acbd7e6f5015027c30936c23fb
1051922 F20101204_AACOQQ vidoz_m_Page_065.jp2
9e38c56edc5b582bf937bf5bfe739f96
b2a898dad97e04b6caf6f48dff9593d602f35084
104669 F20101204_AACORG vidoz_m_Page_082.jp2
ca5311e6dec4c4e73ad6df411e0de5c4
0686a30bf4168b998473de50c66dad3277bca1f9
408751 F20101204_AACOQR vidoz_m_Page_066.jp2
967ba0e79f64865afae52f1d04672094
25a46fc662c2df95e153592f92e62e90d347c9b2
72388 F20101204_AACORH vidoz_m_Page_083.jp2
d6add1e11d7b501e1dcaccdf1b0c6a77
2dbe64b866175499077466a8966a104cb578285c
389025 F20101204_AACOQS vidoz_m_Page_067.jp2
5f22ce895fdf0bcbb6d16fedd1d6872c
eeccc1f0643ed7d7e861ff9043f717ec874add35
1051907 F20101204_AACORI vidoz_m_Page_084.jp2
1a25485384d7b9bf18270b4ebf540459
c4b01d89434fdb5a3fd9dc24935c0947563f0d5f
431602 F20101204_AACOQT vidoz_m_Page_068.jp2
d18e519ba2488c3abe9c1db5cbbda009
6e87cd2b66e60486ff0d6d5f565d3128654aaf31
420163 F20101204_AACORJ vidoz_m_Page_085.jp2
db8a7b1f5b507706a3d52ed86a8dcb80
d207179cb80daaa2547f7541e8edea6a697c074a
399467 F20101204_AACOQU vidoz_m_Page_069.jp2
8209aab47dafb7dd35b6dc0251b27f2e
b6551464c90a0b7ce3cd97a61ce8ae3a46e80e9f
210786 F20101204_AACORK vidoz_m_Page_086.jp2
84471b439fc5cc8241901b134a9a3462
8ba29ab7d4ed42d1c056ed3106ff0d3f9405a8e0
406402 F20101204_AACOQV vidoz_m_Page_071.jp2
89cb119b3ccf9bd9ce0e1c6b2bf32422
a839c6b1279e76454e8cd73844fbe2e387af89af
100542 F20101204_AACORL vidoz_m_Page_087.jp2
e9161bbc7a2815ea6f20e48b6c7932d0
a65793c63a9e81aeb9718d48e1ea1cc85eeba3e3
411602 F20101204_AACOQW vidoz_m_Page_072.jp2
32c31036adce4354999c2b29854256e7
7be8bc98e73970efc7d92d591c184136c717c5f7
98505 F20101204_AACORM vidoz_m_Page_088.jp2
81043f5f6496ece0c9fcf5e3412cc3b5
e70f0084e8f5da5bef6da81d7f59372cf0c28e77
413484 F20101204_AACOQX vidoz_m_Page_073.jp2
57b20931fe977a6140e11647c87b6237
092ebb26c613f3cc6f21b95a34a3c83641340c60
126108 F20101204_AACOSA vidoz_m_Page_102.jp2
96246c49cd22d89f32ed61db7fd59ef8
15a3a824329f2e626664fefa37c9609d19b5fdc0
83501 F20101204_AACORN vidoz_m_Page_089.jp2
e26efc6728e130699c2b33263889da99
29aff09eccf6e908e8b1e35ce5e12ad15b8e7d8a
104492 F20101204_AACOQY vidoz_m_Page_074.jp2
9804c1237731bf40ceae99e7966bfb2f
fb00356c54bca0e10a5f36f0e7f1ce5b0afab659
142772 F20101204_AACOSB vidoz_m_Page_103.jp2
acd14c908ca8c6ed50babc530a0162ee
3788b27a03597fccbf548b3f3d572f2ffecbb47e
112332 F20101204_AACOQZ vidoz_m_Page_075.jp2
ba5283f9487b15a2edc8d6b810255852
9297613e01de542b4b4095b6a890a0fe15a14369
129696 F20101204_AACOSC vidoz_m_Page_104.jp2
2657a9fabe35319435f7e74c5209d5cd
2b1ffb6a4ba0572dd4162b3d8cc82708e9f08759
91088 F20101204_AACORO vidoz_m_Page_090.jp2
9d6df1f78afad18ad27b397d599a6f93
f9b5c41230411075b6de08c5163f0228aae4d0bf
132397 F20101204_AACOSD vidoz_m_Page_105.jp2
09a335e6c84995e237043b807b19b71c
bb6cae58a0f048a597a11fd9ce03a5231ebdcb20
85243 F20101204_AACORP vidoz_m_Page_091.jp2
3c31df7afb4ff8fc09732ca6cec58476
1fbd22907f7cf0ece894745d78029a5674253c4d
134545 F20101204_AACOSE vidoz_m_Page_106.jp2
91c2c5e47bf926b62c00d8f448532c88
b9d6545a73ac6d9035e3f466e102a57dcaabde8f
74661 F20101204_AACORQ vidoz_m_Page_092.jp2
8386f52dc578d83180a0f12711a246f7
79edfe5b2a3772a4ef6aa9a6c7df57fe5e67b573
10532 F20101204_AACOSF vidoz_m_Page_107.jp2
3b5e2ac9b2323a6766f2ae493b180a60
60a9c3eef99e3aa8584da48812e86da57799db40
77150 F20101204_AACORR vidoz_m_Page_093.jp2
73acccbd56e8ee17d52722a2f8ea8a8d
5ec13c976f1dc339250542da69bd37b972e89024
56885 F20101204_AACOSG vidoz_m_Page_108.jp2
f63aed53db33346cf7317d1c0436dbaa
d566e84d32c9eeb0d76bbb8c00cbd5cf98ba9832
74545 F20101204_AACORS vidoz_m_Page_094.jp2
c26c4d5ac3ee98349a62cc4a8a062459
211f8f415369b5fd2e17b9e030392f59c5d12f8a
F20101204_AACOSH vidoz_m_Page_001.tif
88efb3a1b129b4632d55a519e348cb2a
7812a8647fe1eceb3453228e3ceaf05c6223eb77
80876 F20101204_AACORT vidoz_m_Page_095.jp2
1d2bc5fc677f1538f277edc7974df8b9
98c29a2249f54ef06ffacae41e8501025f53a45a
F20101204_AACOSI vidoz_m_Page_002.tif
5bc26ce414b0898604446d74bd306fd3
d3c2f3f6eb0c0872a6ae807f37f8b3f33c2ccbe5
43042 F20101204_AACORU vidoz_m_Page_096.jp2
cec19c1e4dde5eb66c7daf949a73f403
1e797dd0d22ba366933881c07451e091e20cc743
F20101204_AACOSJ vidoz_m_Page_003.tif
b092c8e7c73902cba120397cad1ee8df
3ac53a50db48516cb7d60c2be1ea477116200ccd
422681 F20101204_AACORV vidoz_m_Page_097.jp2
3f9d7897bbf03dec1ffe9335744c521c
59a739d518ae0cdd6405d9c064c4df6aa891315b
F20101204_AACOSK vidoz_m_Page_004.tif
98563aa9e5aa5f267e9d91239be2938c
f57626bb45f2196c24e73c2a5a30ee573e5ae501
219427 F20101204_AACORW vidoz_m_Page_098.jp2
e9ac42d87a1d8cd98381a5f9aae53b52
1145a0f4b825516f1c4991c2209af0f520f65e41
F20101204_AACOSL vidoz_m_Page_006.tif
e0edf71f420e9d3ead3be467c720d999
86d2be87fac244f5fbbd19cdc31b6f370d0e4c43
115074 F20101204_AACORX vidoz_m_Page_099.jp2
7cc7d6e20951e6c128aad83047ef5aa9
0f49ad5691a05f31af00ed12592e8431c445a720
F20101204_AACOTA vidoz_m_Page_021.tif
a8603d81088d0b417028dae0bf7e31ac
cfee7a46e9b26b531a50a805ff998acd8d86aa0d
F20101204_AACOSM vidoz_m_Page_007.tif
536b9e159ec034ed8e36d2b302337717
1f88049530104ee1afb53f66e12275fe135343fd
146187 F20101204_AACORY vidoz_m_Page_100.jp2
fff22cb387301e565c6c646b4b393d48
4e377757580b5021823ab9b7ed3b022f53edf411
F20101204_AACOTB vidoz_m_Page_022.tif
e73785040f8fe1cd7d7fc4725e0ba751
4a227c6f9ba02cd42610f323e62cba5eb89e7375
F20101204_AACOSN vidoz_m_Page_008.tif
fca133d2482d50caa9e0bab902330d8f
b0327ece2bb5129bde6c1d289875e3a55d54096a
127889 F20101204_AACORZ vidoz_m_Page_101.jp2
c6e72e8910ce16fd3901977c3b71283c
71a18670b0c0a5c717002c2cf4a5ccf70b8f9d64
F20101204_AACOTC vidoz_m_Page_023.tif
b4708f6d66ffa597166d292679e01ea7
67f5f2ac2ba12bec9fe69071ef1b333e7e9de395
F20101204_AACOSO vidoz_m_Page_009.tif
739a4d7b9bb96284c96b4ab809ae0bca
6f5b4f9efe2284aa9ff9fddbda5635ca3b226c6f
F20101204_AACOTD vidoz_m_Page_024.tif
77b071fb8cbab7562068b912854bbf65
ea528c412860aee69d141fffa1671bdcaac4220a
F20101204_AACOTE vidoz_m_Page_025.tif
bad49a9d5e41bddf879aae5fac22a437
d79e3bfb70ecfe96bc83e9b99a9cbfb812e7bd8c
F20101204_AACOSP vidoz_m_Page_010.tif
bbbea2599d23fbe8c17b91787bad24ba
209939672c8ab7302fb9414304bdd5b41f5fdc5d
F20101204_AACOTF vidoz_m_Page_026.tif
f285bd964218c921ecc719888435fdb6
c39b4450a8ac64692363a95d9ee862a22f525ba6
F20101204_AACOSQ vidoz_m_Page_011.tif
af8ffd5ffed26a1da0a70db12b11a9dd
93ef76853c4c4dcb8c433cff31308fe9b65b1722
F20101204_AACOTG vidoz_m_Page_027.tif
32964c842d3be1a8248ae5ee0e4cc4e8
d7aa8f204c143932e9320e799d6ce6b041561e4b
F20101204_AACOSR vidoz_m_Page_012.tif
ff7f1f64cba20aa97d2457ef15a5e28d
cf55b97eb89bfbf90c9eb33ccb485b5849e7ad3f



PAGE 1

TISSUE CULTURE OF Trifolium polymorphum, T. carolin ianum, Adesmia latifolia, A. bicolor AND Lotononis bainesii By MARIA LAURA VIDOZ A THESIS PRESENTED TO THE GRADUATE SCHOOL OF THE UNIVERSITY OF FLOR IDA IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF SCIENCE UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA 2006

PAGE 2

Copyright 2006 by Maria Laura Vidoz

PAGE 3

To my mother and to God, for their unconditional love.

PAGE 4

iv ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I would like to thank God fo r revealing His presence throughout my life, for His guidance during hard times and for His many bl essings. I am thankful to my mother for her unconditional support and encouragemen t, for devoting so much time to my education, for giving me a deep love of natu re, making it difficult to put into words how much she means to me. I would like to thank my supervisory co mmittee chair (Dr. Kenneth Quesenberry) for his advice and knowledge, and for introduc ing me to his wonderf ul family, all of which helped me professionally and personally. I am also grateful to the other members of my committee (Dr. Mimi Williams, Dr. Ma ria Gallo and Dr. David Wofford) for their critics and suggestions. I thank Judy Dampier for her technical support, friendship and advice, making my stay in Gainesville a positive experience. I th ank Loan Ngo for her technical assistance and sincere friendship. I also appreciate th e technical support of Lindsay and Kailey Place. I am thankful to Luis Mroginski and Dr. Hebe Rey, who introduced me to the tissue culture world and constantly encour aged me to grow in my career. I would like to thank Lorena, Carlos, Gaby, Raquel, Jorge and Sonali for their company during these two years, and to all my friends in Argentina for their support.

PAGE 5

v TABLE OF CONTENTS page ACKNOWLEDGMENTS.................................................................................................iv LIST OF TABLES............................................................................................................vii LIST OF FIGURES.............................................................................................................x ABSTRACT......................................................................................................................xii CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION........................................................................................................1 2 LITERATURE REVIEW.............................................................................................5 Tissue Culture Concepts as A pplied to the Fabaceae Family.......................................5 Applications of Tissue Culture for the Fabaceae Family.............................................9 Production of Plants Free from Certain Specific Pathogens...............................10 Micropropagation................................................................................................11 Production of Dihaploid, Homozygous Plants....................................................12 Generation of Interspecific Hybrids: Embryo Rescue and Protoplast Fusion.....12 Plant Regeneration after Tr ansformation Protocols............................................14 Medium and Long-term Germplasm C onservation and Plant Material Exchange..........................................................................................................15 3 MATERIALS AND METHODS...............................................................................17 Plant Material..............................................................................................................17 Culture Conditions......................................................................................................17 Evaluation and Experimental Design.........................................................................19 4 TISSUE CULTURE OF Trifolium polymorphum AND T. carolinianum .................21 Introduction.................................................................................................................21 Materials and methods................................................................................................22 Trifolium polymorphum .......................................................................................22 Trifolium carolinianum .......................................................................................23 Results and Discussion...............................................................................................23 Trifolium polymorphum .......................................................................................23

PAGE 6

vi Trifolium carolinianum .......................................................................................25 Conclusions.................................................................................................................27 5 PLANT REGENERATION OF Adesmia latifolia AND A. bicolor ..........................31 Introduction.................................................................................................................31 Materials and Methods...............................................................................................32 Plant Material......................................................................................................32 Basal Media Experiment.....................................................................................33 Factorial Experiments with TDZ and BAP.........................................................34 Induction Time Experiments...............................................................................35 Type of Explant Experiment...............................................................................35 Results and Discussion...............................................................................................36 Effect of Basal Medium on Shoot Organogenesis..............................................36 Influence of TDZ on Organogenesis...................................................................38 Influence of BAP on Organogenesis...................................................................40 Induction Time for Adventitious Bud Formation................................................42 Effect of Explant Type on Shoot Organogenesis................................................44 Conclusions.................................................................................................................45 6 PLANT REGENERATION OF Lotononis bainesii ...................................................61 Introduction.................................................................................................................61 Materials and Methods...............................................................................................62 Cotyledon Culture...............................................................................................62 Leaflet Culture.....................................................................................................62 Type of Explants..................................................................................................63 Results and Discussion...............................................................................................63 Cotyledon Culture...............................................................................................63 Leaflet Culture.....................................................................................................65 Type of Explant...................................................................................................67 Conclusions.................................................................................................................68 7 SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS.........................................................................74 APPENDIX ADDITIONAL TABLES FOR TWO GENOTYPES OF Adesmia latifolia .....................77 LIST OF REFERENCES...................................................................................................86 BIOGRAPHICAL SKETCH.............................................................................................95

PAGE 7

vii LIST OF TABLES Table page 3-1 Plant material used as a source of explants in the experiments...............................20 4-1 Mean percentage of explants producing callus from petiole pieces of T. polymorphum in three basal media after 30 days of culture....................................29 4-2 Number of buds per explan t in the responsive genotypes of T. carolinianum cultured on medium supplemented with 10 M TDZ after 30 and 60 days of culture.......................................................................................................................29 5-1 Effect of three basal media on percenta ge of adventitious bud formation, mean number of buds and regeneration index in A. bicolor and A. latifolia after 60 days of culture..........................................................................................................47 5-2 Effect of TDZ concentration on percenta ge of adventitious bud formation, mean number of buds per explant, and regeneration index in A. latifolia after 30 days of culture..................................................................................................................48 5-3 Effect of TDZ concentration on percenta ge of adventitious bud formation, mean number of buds per explant, regenerati on index, number of shoots, shoot length and percentage of ex vitro survival in A. latifolia ....................................................48 5-4 Effect of BAP concentration on percen tage of adventitious bud formation, mean number of buds per explant and regeneration index in A. latifolia after 30 days of culture..................................................................................................................49 5-5 Effect of BAP concentration on percen tage of adventitious bud formation, mean number of buds per explant and regenera tion index after 60 days of culture; and shoot length after 90 days of culture in A. latifolia ..................................................49 5-6 Effect of different times of exposur e to TDZ on bud formation percentage, mean number of buds per explant and regeneration index in A. latifolia after 30 and 60 days of culture..........................................................................................................50 5-7 Effect of short exposure to TDZ on bud formation percentage, mean number of buds per explant and regeneration index in A. latifolia after 30 days of culture.....50 5-8 Effect of explant type on bud forma tion percentage, mean number of buds per explant and regeneration index in A. latifolia after 30 days of culture...................51

PAGE 8

viii 6-1 ANOVA table showing the p-values corres ponding to the effect of explant type on bud formation percentage, mean number of buds per explant and regeneration index in L. bainesii after 30 days of culture............................................................70 6-2 Effect of explant type on bud forma tion percentage, mean number of buds per explant and regeneration index in L. bainesii after 30 days of culture...................70 A-1 Effect of different combinations of TDZ and IBA on percentage of adventitious bud formation and mean number of buds per explant in A. latifolia U18.6 after 30 and 60 days of culture.........................................................................................77 A-2 Effect of different combinations of TDZ and IBA on regeneration index, number of shoots per explant and shoot length in A. latifolia U18.6 after 60 days of culture.......................................................................................................................77 A-3 Effect of different combinations of TDZ and IBA on percentage of adventitious bud formation and mean number of buds per explant in A. latifolia U18.8 after 30 and 60 days of culture.........................................................................................78 A-4 Effect of different combinations of TDZ and IBA on regeneration index, number of shoots per explant and shoot length in A. latifolia U18.8 after 60 days of culture.......................................................................................................................78 A-5 Effect of different combinations of TDZ and IBA on percentage of ex vitro acclimatization in A. latifolia U18.6 and U18.8 after 20 days of transfer to ex vitro conditions.........................................................................................................79 A-6 Effect of different combinations of BAP and IBA on percentage of adventitious bud formation and mean number of buds per explant in A. latifolia U18.6 after 30 and 60 days of culture.........................................................................................79 A-7 Effect of different combinations of BAP and IBA on regeneration index and shoot length in A. latifolia U18.6 after 60 days of culture.......................................80 A-8 Effect of different combinations of BAP and IBA on percentage of adventitious bud formation and mean number of buds per explant in A. latifolia U18.8 after 30 and 60 days of culture.........................................................................................80 A-9 Effect of different combinations of BAP and IBA on regeneration index and shoot length in A. latifolia U18.8 after 60 days of culture.......................................81 A-10 Effect of different times of exposur e to TDZ on bud formation percentage, mean number of buds per explant and regeneration index in A. latifolia U18.6 after 30 and 60 days of culture..............................................................................................81 A-11 Effect of different times of exposur e to TDZ on bud formation percentage, mean number of buds per explant and regeneration index in A. latifolia U18.8 after 30 and 60 days of culture..............................................................................................82

PAGE 9

ix A-12 Effect of short exposure to TDZ on bud formation percentage, mean number of buds per explant and regeneration index in A. latifolia U18.6 and U18.8 after 30 days of culture..........................................................................................................82 A-13 Effect of explant type on bud forma tion percentage, mean number of buds per explant and regeneration index in A. latifolia U18.6 and U18.8 after 30 days of culture.......................................................................................................................83

PAGE 10

x LIST OF FIGURES Figure page 4-1 Shoot bud organogenesis th rough cotyledon culture of T. carolinianum ................30 5-1 Organogenesis in A. latifolia ....................................................................................52 5-2 Regression curve showing the effect of TDZ concentration on percentage of adventitious bud formation in A. latifolia after 60 days of culture..........................53 5-3 Regression curve showing the effect of TDZ concentration on regeneration index in A. latifolia after 30 days of culture.............................................................53 5-4 Regression curve showing the effect of TDZ concentration on shoot number per explant in A. latifolia after 90 days of culture..........................................................54 5-5 Regression curve showing the effect of TDZ concentration on shoot length in A. latifolia after 90 days of culture...............................................................................54 5-6 Regression curve showing the effect of TDZ concentration on acclimatization rate in A. latifolia after 30 days of transfer to ex vitro conditions............................55 5-7 Regression curve showing the effect of BAP concentration on percentage of adventitious bud formation in A. latifolia after 30 days of culture..........................55 5-8 Regression curve showing the effect of BAP concentration on regeneration index in A. latifolia after 30 days of culture.............................................................56 5-9 Regression curve showing the effect of BAP concentration on percentage of adventitious bud formation in A. latifolia after 60 days of culture..........................56 5-10 Regression curve showing the effect of BAP concentration on mean number of buds per explant in A. latifolia after 60 days of culture...........................................57 5-11 Regression curve showing the effect of BAP concentration on regeneration index in A. latifolia after 60 days of culture.............................................................57 5-12 Regression curve showing the effect of BAP concentration on shoot length in A. latifolia after 90 days of culture...............................................................................58 5-13 Regression curve sowing the effect of exposure to TDZ on bud formation percentage in A. latifolia after 60 days of initiation of cultures...............................58

PAGE 11

xi 5-14 Regression curve sowing the effect of exposure to TDZ on mean number of buds per explant in A. latifolia after 60 days of initiation of cultures......................59 5-15 Regression curve sowing the effect of exposure to TDZ on regeneration index in A. latifolia after 60 days of in itiation of cultures.....................................................59 5-16 Regression curve sowing the effect of short exposures to TDZ on percentage of bud formation in A. latifolia after 30 days of in itiation of cultures..........................60 5-17 Regression curve sowing the effect of short exposures to TDZ on regeneration index in A. latifolia after 30 days of initiation of cultures.......................................60 6-1 Organogenesis in L. bainesii ....................................................................................71 6-2 Number of buds produced per explant by 50 genotypes of L. bainesii after 30 days of culture from cotyledon and leaflets.............................................................72 6-3 Number of plants produced per explan t after 90 days of culture by responsive genotypes of L. bainesii through cotyledon and leaflet culture...............................72 6-4 Number of successfully acclima tized plants in the genotypes of L. bainesii that were capable of plant regeneration through cotyledon and leaflet culture...............73 A-1 Regression curve sowing the effect of exposure to TDZ on bud formation percentage in A. latifolia after 30 days of initiation of cultures...............................84 A-2 Regression curve sowing the effect of exposure to TDZ on mean number of buds per explant in A. latifolia after 30 days of initiation of cultures......................84 A-3 Regression curve sowing the effect of exposure to TDZ on regeneration index in A. latifolia after 30 days of in itiation of cultures.....................................................85

PAGE 12

xii Abstract of Thesis Presen ted to the Graduate School of the University of Florida in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Science TISSUE CULTURE OF Trifolium polymorphum, T. carolin ianum, Adesmia latifolia, A. bicolor AND Lotononis bainesii By Maria Laura Vidoz December 2006 Chair: Kenneth H. Quesenberry Cochair: Mary J. Williams Major Department: Agronomy Although they fix nitrogen, provide feed for livestock, improve soil properties and protect the soil from erosion, many forage legume species have been underutilized. Currently, breeding programs have an increase d interest in several of the less-studied species that could improve pasture quality in subtropi cal regions of the world. Trifolium polymorphum Poir. T. carolinianum Michx., Adesmia latifolia (Spreng.) Vogel, A. bicolor (Poir.) DC. and Lotononis bainesii Baker are promising forages; however, they possess two major drawbacks: low seedling vigor and low dry matter production. The objective of this research was to develop in vitro plant regeneration protocols for these species that could assist breeding prog rams by potentially enabling the use of in vitro chromosome doubling techniques and genetic transformation. Experiments using three types of basal medium (MS, L2 and B5) were conducted with T. polymorphum and Adesmia spp. In the latter, the effect of different plant growth regulators (TDZ, BAP and IBA) alone or in combination was evaluated. Cotyledon

PAGE 13

xiii culture on media supplemented with various plant growth regulators was assessed in T. carolinianum Adesmia spp and L. bainesii Time required for shoot bud induction in A. latifolia was determined using immature leaflets as explants. Different leaf parts were evaluated for their morphogenetic potential in A. latifolia and L. bainesii In T. polymorphum, only callus formation was achieved using primarily B5 basal medium. With T. carolinianum cotyledon culture on MS + 10 M TDZ for 30 days with transfer to MS + 1 M TDZ gave superior shoot bud or ganogenesis (20% of genotypes). Plant regeneration of A. bicolor was achieved through immature leaflet culture on MS or L2 + 4.5 M TDZ for 60 days followed by transf er to MS devoid of plant growth regulators for 45 days. The highest fr equency of plant regeneration in A. latifolia was obtained using immature rachises cultured on MS + 10 M TDZ for 20 days and then transferred to MS without plant growth regulators for bud elongation and rooting. L. bainesii plant regeneration (in 90% of genotype s) was achieved by culturing immature leaflets on MS + 4.5 M TDZ for 30 days a nd then transferring cu ltures to MS + 0.044 M BAP + 0.049 M IBA for bud elongation and rooting. In conclusion, shoot organoge nesis protocols were devel oped for four out of the five forage legume species evaluated, and pl ant regeneration was ach ieved with three of these species. Additional experiments to obtain rooting of T. carolinianum should be conducted. Studies to reduce the inciden ce of hyperhydricity in cultures of Adesmia spp. and to assess the influence of different pl ant growth regulators on shoot bud formation of L. bainesii are also needed.

PAGE 14

1 CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION In addition to providing feed for livestock, forages offer multiple benefits such as maintenance and improvement of soil charact eristics, weed suppre ssion, and protection of soil from erosion. When used as cover crops, fo rages may also assist in the recovery of degraded soils (Peters et al., 2003) by decrea sing the loss of nutrients from leaching or erosion (Tilman et al., 2002). Fora ges that exhibit two or more of these characteristics are better accepted by farmers in agricu ltural systems (Peters et al., 2003). The family Fabaceae comprises between 670 to 750 genera and 18,000 to 19,000 species, many of which constitute an important source of protein in human and animal diets, balancing the amino acids provid ed by cereals (Graham & Vance, 2003). According to Crews & Peoples (2004), legum es constitute a more environmentally friendly source of nitrogen than synthetic fert ilizers due to their ability to fix nitrogen, reducing the risk of eutrophication and c ontamination of subterranean water. However, numerous species of pasture le gumes have thus far been underutilized (Graham & Vance, 2003), although many of them could be used to increase the genetic variability of their cultivated relatives or as a source of useful genes. For instance, legumes bred for drought and salinity tolerance would be useful in water-stressed areas of the world (Graham & Vance, 2003). In this scen ario, forages that are naturally adapted to those conditions will be particularly valuable. With approximately 240 species, the genus Trifolium L. is one of the most important genera in the Fabaceae family rega rding the number of species it comprises

PAGE 15

2 and their potential uses (Zohary & Heller, 1984). It is found in temperate to subtropical regions of Europe, the Americas, Asia and Africa (Lange & Schifino-Wittmann, 2000), but also occurs in the mountai n and alpine zones in the tropi cs of West Africa and South America (Zohary & Heller, 1984). At leas t 25 species are useful as forages. Trifolium polymorphum is endemic to subtropical South America and T. carolinianum is endemic to subtropical North America. Although common in native grasslands, neither species has been the s ubject of crop improvement research through plant breeding programs. T. polymorphum Poir. is a perennial subtropical species described in the United States, Argentina, Brazil, Chile, Paraguay, Peru and Uruguay (Quesenberry et al., 1997). It constitutes th e only amphicarpic species in the genus and has been used in some cytogenetic an d reproductive studies (Lange & SchifinoWittmann, 2000). Agronomic evaluations c onducted in New Zealand discovered one accession with 154 g kg-1 crude protein and 697 g kg-1 digestibility (D odd & Orr, 1995). However, its marginal dry matter (DM) production and low seedling vigor is a major limitation for its use as a forage legume. Trifolium carolinianum Michx. is an annual species na tive to the southeastern US. It produces seed and nodul ates profusely, but like T. polymorphum it has low seedling vigor and low DM production. Genetic impr ovement through traditional breeding and transformation can overcome these restri ctions. Transformation, however, usually requires an efficient protocol for plant regeneration to be in place. Although in vitro regeneration protocols are available for several Trifolium species (Ding et al., 2003), there are none for T. polymorphum or T. carolinianum Additionally, induction of polyploidy can also be used to increase s eedling vigor and overal l plant size, as was

PAGE 16

3 shown previously in the genus Trifolium (Taylor et al., 1976; Fur uya et al., 2001). Once again, the availability of an in vitro protocol would permit the use of additional techniques to duplicate chromosomes in T. polymorphum as has been demonstrated in bahiagrass ( Paspalum notatum Flgge) using colchicine, trifluralin and oryzalin (Quesenberry et al., 2003). Moreover, the use of an in vitro protocol to induce chromosome duplication could pr event the recovery of chimeric plants that often are obtained when vegetative merist ems are treated with chromosome doubling agents. In an in vitro system single cells are doubled and, consequently, plant regeneration from these single cells, as in th e case of adventitious bud formation, renders a plant whose cells uniformly contain duplicated chromosomes. Adesmia DC. (Fabaceae) is the only genus of the South American tribe Adesmieae (Benth.) Hutch and it comprises approximately 240 species of herbs and shrubs (Ulibarri & Burkart, 2000). Many Adesmia species, such as A. bicolor (Poir.) DC., A. latifolia (Spreng.) Vogel and A. punctata (Poir.) DC., constitute promising forage materials because of their satisfactory winter gr owth, high crude protein values and good in vitro organic matter digestibility. These species have been reported to be useful for soil cover and erosion control (Coelho & Battistin, 1998; Tedesco et al., 2000; Tedesco et al., 2001). In addition, A. bicolor showed tolerance to low phosphorous fertility and possesses valuable morphological characterist ics when compared to other legumes (Dodd & Orr, 1995). In spite of these desirable char acteristics, there are ve ry few reports related to the biology of the genus (Coelho & Batt istin, 1998; Dodd & Orr, 1995; Tedesco et al., 2000; Tedesco et al., 2001), and no reports regarding their use in tissue culture.

PAGE 17

4 The genus Lotononis belongs to the tribe Crotalar ieae and comprises approximately 150 species, from herbs to small shrubs (Jafth a et al., 2002). These species are distributed from Southern Africa to the Mediterranean region and Indi a, and are found under a range of climates and geographical situations. L. bainesii Baker is a perennial herb whose forage value has been demonstrated in Au stralia (Jaftha et al., 2002). Although it has been previously reported to be a cleistogam ous species, Real et al (2004) have conducted molecular studies that suggest that it requires pollinators to set seed and some genotypes are self-incompatible. There is on ly one report on tissue culture of L. bainessi where a low frequency of plant regenera tion was obtained (Bovo et al., 1986). Limited quantities of seeds may constitute a problem for release of new cultivars (Frame, 2004) but tissue culture may offer a solution, shortening the period of time for the availability of propagul es. In addition, in cross pol linated species such as L. bainesii A. latifolia and A. bicolor each seed is potentially a differe nt genotype. Therefore, it is not possible to propagate a plant exhibiting exceptional ch aracteristics through seeds since the progeny may segregate for the tr ait of interest. However, micropropagation offers a solution for the mass propa gation of an individual plant.

PAGE 18

5 CHAPTER 2 LITERATURE REVIEW All plant cells have the potentia l to be totitpotent, i.e., to be able to dedifferentiate, divide and regenerate into whole plants (L oidl, 2004). This was the idea that Gottlieb Haberlandt had in mind when he first atte mpted plant tissue culture in the early 20th century (Caponetti et al., 2004) Although he failed in his ve nture to regenerate plants from isolated tissues, his work attracted the attention of the scientific world and, consequently, abundant research was developed on the topic. Tissue Culture Concepts as A pplied to the Fabaceae Family Tissue culture is usually defined as a he terogeneous group of techniques in which explants (protoplasts, cells, tissues or or gans) are aseptically placed onto a culture medium of defined chemical composition, and incubated under c ontrolled conditions (Mroginski et al., 2004b). Ther e are three types of plant re generation systems that are used most frequently: micropropagation, or ganogenesis and somatic embryogenesis. Micropropagation consists of the in vitro propagation of selected genotypes through improved axillary shoot production from explan ts with pre-existing meristems (Kane, 2004). In contrast, the other two regene ration schemes are based on the use of nonmeristematic tissues as explants: organogenesis is the de novo formation of organs (shoots, roots or flowers), and somatic embryogenesis is the production of embryos without a previous fusion of gametes (Radice, 2004). Members of the Fabaceae family have tradit ionally been regarded as recalcitrant to in vitro regeneration, particularly in the case of cultivated grain legumes (Griga, 1999;

PAGE 19

6 Veltcheva et al., 2005; Mundhara & Rashid, 2006). Veltcheva et al. (2005) suggest that recalcitrance in grain legume s could be caused by the narrow genetic base of the cultivated varieties that have undergone inbreeding and selecti on for long periods of time. In addition, they suggest that in forage species the outbreeding and lower genotype selection may account for easier iden tification of responsive genotypes. Some of the factors that affect in vitro response of a given species are genotype, explant, composition of the culture medium and conditions under which explants are incubated (Radice, 2004). The genotype of th e donor plant is one of the most critical factors since it influences in vitro responses, from the establis hment of the explant to the regeneration of whole plants, as well as ex vitro, during the acclimatization of regenerated plants. The importance of the genotype on in vitro plant regeneration of cultivated peanut ( Arachis hypogaea L.) has been demonstrated by Chengalrayan et al. (1998), who assessed 16 genotypes for responsiveness in vitro using a protocol to induce somatic embryogenesis. These authors found diff erences in the freque ncy of response at each stage of the process and suggested that genotype could be the primary factor influencing conversion of soma tic embryos to plantlets. A similar experiment was carried out in soybean ( Glycine max (L.) Merrill), in which 17 br eeding lines were evaluated for their response and ability to regenerate pl ants through somatic embryogenesis (Tomlin et al., 2002). Among these lines, a significant difference in the percentage of responsive explants, number and quality of somatic em bryos were observed. Other legume species in which differences among genotypes were re ported, particularly regarding somatic embryogenesis are Medicago sativa L. and T. pratense L. (Lakshmanan & Taji, 2000).

PAGE 20

7 For T. pratense Quesenberry and Smith (1993) increased genotype regeneration frequency from less than 5% to almost 70%, after five cycles of recurrent selection. The explant type used for culture estab lishment depends on the objectives that are pursued since it determines respons iveness of the plant material in vitro (Lakshmanan & Taji, 2000). The aspects that should be consider ed in explant selecti on are: explant tissue (leaves, petals, anthers, roots, meristems, cotyledons, epicotyls, hypocotyls), explant size, explantation time, topophysis and polyphenol oxidation (Kane, 2004). It is widely accepted that immature zygotic embryos and young seedlings are the most responsive explants to induce somatic embryogenesis in le gume species. This is because areas where cells show active division are more responsiv e to the embryogenic s timulus (Griga, 1999; Mundhara & Rashid, 2006). However, a range of explants have been used with success to induce somatic embryogenesis in Fabaceae family. These have included mature seeds, shoot apices, seedlings, hypocotyls, cotyledon s, leaves, petioles, internodes, roots, endosperms, cell suspensions and protoplasts (Lakshmanan & Taji, 2000). For the induction of organogenesis in legume species, a si milar variety of explants has been used. As an example, in Arachis several explants have been capable of regenerating plants: fully expanded leaves (Dunbar & Pittman, 1992) leaflets from young seedlings (Akasaka et al., 2000), epicotyls, petio les (Cheng et al., 1992), cotyle dons, embryo-axes, mature whole seeds (Radhakrishnan et al., 2000), pr otoplasts (Li et al., 1993), mature zygotic embryo-derived leaflets (Chenga lrayan et al., 2001) and shoo t apices (Radhakrishnan et al., 1999). Culture medium composition is determin ed by the type and concentration of inorganic salts (macroand micro-nutrient s), organic compounds (sugar, vitamins,

PAGE 21

8 activated charcoal, etc.), plant growth regulat ors (mainly auxins and cytokinins), gelling agents or other support system and the gase ous atmosphere inside the culture vessel (Radice, 2004). The most widely used basa l medium for legume regeneration is MS medium developed by Murashige and Skoog (1962) for callus cultures of tobacco (Murashige & Skoog, 1962). This basal medium, which has a high salt concentration, has been used to achieve plant regeneration in several legume genera, such as Arachis (Rey & Mroginski, 2006), Astragalus (Luo et al., 1999), Cajanus (Singh et al., 2003), Cassia (Agrawal & Sardar, 2006), Cicer (Chakraborti et al., Dalbergia (Singh & Chand, 2003), Glycine (Tomlin et al., 2002), 2006), Lathyrus (Barik et al., 2005), Lotus (Akashi et at., 2003), Phaseolus (Delgado-Sanchez et al., 2006), Pisum (Loiseau et al., 1998), Trifolium (Ding et al., 2003) and Vigna (Saini & Jaiwal, 2002). Howe ver, other basal media have been specifically developed for certain legume species, such as G. max (Gamborg et al., 1968) and T. pratense (Collins & Phillips, 1982). Several plant growth regulators have been used with success in pl ant regeneration protocols for le gume species, but the type of response and effectiveness of the compounds are highly de pendent on the species and even on genotypes within a species. In gene ral, auxins are used to induce somatic embryogenesis, whereas cytokinins are used to induce organogenesis. Nevertheless, there are some exceptions such as in T. repens L., Medicago sativa and Phaseolus spp., in which it was possible to achieve somatic embr yogenesis by using cytokinins instead of auxins (Lakshmanan & Taji, 2000). In addition to media composition fact ors, incubation conditions under which explants are incubated must be controlled. Th ese include temperature, light quality and intensity, photoperiod, humidity and hygiene (M roginski et al., 2004b). In general, the

PAGE 22

9 temperature for incubation of cultures is be tween 23-29 C, depending on optimal growth requirement of the species (Radice, 2004). In some cases, when the process to be induced is somatic embryogenesis, cultures are incubate d in the dark, since li ght is not required for this developmental pathway. In contra st, when organogenesis is to be induced, cultures are usually kept under light conditions with a specific photoperiod. In addition, light quality (spectra l quality) and quantity (photon flux) are reported to have an important role in morphogenetic processes in vitro and on the subsequent growth of the regenerated structures (Lian et al., 2002). Applications of Tissue Cult ure for the Fabaceae Family Since its origin in the early 20th century, tissue culture procedures have been used for a variety of purposes, such as basic stud ies of particular ph ysiological processes because the use of tissues instead of whol e plants usually simplifies the study of the phenomenon (Mroginski et al., 2004b). Another use of tissue culture is the production of plants free from certain specific pathogens, generally viruses, through meristem or shoot tip culture alone or combined with thermo/chemotherapy. Ho wever, the most important application of these techniques from an economic point of view is related to micropropagation. This method is particularly im portant in horticulture, since it generally maintains genetic stability (Kane, 2004), and allows propagation of periclinal chimeras. This kind of chimera may be important in ornamental species a nd cannot be propagated through organogenesis or somatic embryogenesis. Tissue culture may also be used for the production of interspecific hybrids where zygotic embryos abort early in their development and have to be rescued, or in the case of plants w ith a rudimentary embryo (Mroginski et al., 2004b). The production of dihaploid, homozygous plants is also possible through anther or ovule culture, wh ich reduces the time required to achieve

PAGE 23

10 homozygosis in breeding programs. Other appl ications of tissue culture include the induction of somaclonal variation, production of secondary metabolites using cell culture, generation of somatic hybrids through prot oplast fusion, and plant regeneration after transformation protocols. From the species preservation point of view, tissue culture constitutes a valuable technique for medi um and long-term germplasm conservation ( in vitro and cryoconservation), as well as plant ma terial exchange since pathogen-free plants are used for this purpose (Mroginski et al., 2004b). Production of Plants Free fr om Certain Specific Pathogens Since plants were first domesticated, di seases and pests have threatened crop productivity. Some diseases caused by fungi a nd bacteria may be controlled if certain practices are used during the cultivation of the crop. However, in the case of viruses, the control is usually more difficult and in many cases the only indication of the presence of a virus is a reduction in crop yields. Viral di seases are transmitted rapidly particularly when the crop is vegetatively propagated (Kartha, 1984). Meristem culture is one of the tools to eliminate viruses from plant material, provided that the rate of virus multiplication a nd movement in the plant is lower than the rate at which the meristematic region elonga tes. This is often the case since vascular tissues do not reach the meristem. In the Fa baceae family, meristem culture has been applied successfully to the rescue of interspecific hybrids between A. hypogaea and A. stenosperma Krapov & W.C. Gregory, and A. hypogaea and A. otavioi, which showed symptoms of peanut stripe virus (Radhakris hnan et al., 1999). Meristem culture with or without thermo/chemotherapy has also been used to eliminate peanut mottle virus, peanut stripe virus and tomato spotted wilt virus from interspecific hybrids of Arachis that were maintained vegetatively in the germplasm collection at the Southern Regional Plant

PAGE 24

11 Introduction Station (Griffin, GA ) (Dunbar et al., 1993a). In c ontrast, shoot tip culture was not an effective procedure to regenerate plants free of the peanut mottle viruses. Prasada Rao et al. (1995) excised seed axes fr om peanut stripe viru s infected seed and cultured them on a medium containing ribavirin to obtain peanut plants free of the virus. Meristem culture has also been successfully applied to other legume genera, such as Trifolium and Phaseolus for the production of plants free of common viruses (Phillips and Collins, 1979; Veltcheva et al., 2005). Micropropagation Micropropagation, the true-totype propagation of a genotype through tissue culture techniques, is a useful tool in breeding programs. Among ot her advantages, it enables the production of uniform plants from a select ed genotype at a high multiplication rate (Olmos et al., 2004). The stages for micropropa gation from shoot expl ants are: a) donor plant selection and preparation, b) axillary shoo t proliferation, c) pretransplant or rooting, and d) transfer to the natural environment (Kane, 2004). Cultivated peanut has been reported to have limited reproductive efficiency, which is a drawback when large populations are re quired for breeding purposes (Radhakrishnan et al., 2000). Micropropagation ma y be used to overcome this situation, provided that an efficient in vitro protocol is available. For this species, Radhakrishnan et al. (2000) developed a high frequency micropropagation protocol from embryo axes and plant regeneration from other juvenile explants Successful micropropagation protocols have also been developed for other species such as Vigna mungo (L.) Hepper, a grain legume important in South Asia and Australia, where plants were regenerated from shoot tips, embryo axes and cotyledonary nodes (Saini & Jaiwal, 2002).

PAGE 25

12 Production of Dihaploid, Homozygous Plants The production of haploid plants followi ng anther, pollen or ovule culture is desired in breeding programs because it woul d result in a reduction in the number of cycles to achieve complete homozygosity after the duplication in the number of chromosomes of the regenerated haploid plants Several attempts have been made in the Fabaceae family but with little succe ss. For instance, in the genus Arachis Bajaj et al. (1980) reported androgenesis but no plan t regeneration from pollen cultures of A. hypogaea and A. glabrata Benth. Bajaj et al. (1981) re ported plant regeneration from anther cultures of A. hypogaea and A. villosa Benth., with a chromosome number varying from haploid to octaploid. In soybean, Rodr igues et al. (2004) st udied the origin of embryo-like structures from anther cultures using molecular techniques. They found both homozygous and heterozygous structures suggesting that embryogenesis and androgenesis occurred simultaneously. Anther culture in Phaseolus resulted in callus formation with cell ploidy levels ranging fr om haploid to polyploi dy (Veltcheva et al., 2005). Generation of Interspecific Hybrids: Embryo Rescue and Protoplast Fusion In many cases, wild species offer traits of interest that could be useful in breeding programs if incorporated into their cultivat ed relatives. Nevertheless, there may be interspecific barriers that need to be overcome in order to be able to transfer the trait of interest. One of the possibilities to circum vent this would be to use tissue culture techniques to rescue the em bryo before it aborts, follo wed by micropropagation of the hybrid if it has low fertility. Arachis villosulicarpa Hoehne, a wild relative of cultivated peanut ( A. hypogaea ), is rich in oil and is resistant to Cercospora arachidicola and Cercosporidium personatum

PAGE 26

13 (Mansur et al., 1993). However, hybrids between this species and A. hypogaea could not be obtained due to cross compatibility barriers that caused abnormal endosperm development (Pittman et al., 1984). Somatic hybridization may be used to overcome this incompatibility, provided that an in vitro protocol is available. For this purpose, Mansur et al. (1993) developed a protoc ol for plant regeneration from cotyledons, leaves and cell suspensions of A. villosulicarpa In the genus Trifolium a few interspecific hybrids have been produced with the aid of tissue culture techni ques, such as hybrids between red clover ( T. pratense ) and T. sarosiense Hazsl. where aseptic embryo rescue was used before in situ abortion (Phillips et al., 1982). Przywara et at (1996) regenerated hybrid pl ants from crosses between T. repens and T. nigrescens Viv. using in vitro pollination followed by embryo rescue. If hybrid embryos did not grow, they were tran sferred onto MS medium supplemented with growth regulators and ac hieved plant regeneration through organogenesis. To apply somatic hybridization for the rec overy of interspecifi c hybrids, at least one of the parents should be able to regenerate plants from protoplasts, but both should be able to undergo protoplast cult ure. In addition, it should be po ssible to select the somatic hybrids (Myers et al., 1989). There are report s on protoplast culture, which in most cases resulted in plant regeneration, in several species of the genus Trifolium such as T. fragiferum L. (Rybcznski, 1997), T. pratense (Myers et al., 1989; Radionenko et al., 1994), T. repens (Webb et al., 1987), T. resupinatum L. (Oelck et al., 1982) and T. rubens L. (Grosser & Collins, 1984). Plant regenerati on from protoplasts has also been obtained in other legume genera such as Astragalus (Hou & Jia, 2004).

PAGE 27

14 Other grain legume genera where embryo resc ue techniques have been applied to obtain interspecific hybrids are Cicer and Phaseolus In order to determine the phase when embryo rescue should occur in wide hybrids, Clarke et al (2006) used selfed chickpea ( Cicer arietinum L.) and selfed wild relatives to study the stage of embryo development at which abortion occurs. Seve ral protocols have been developed to regenerate plants through embryo rescue af ter crosses between cultivated and wild Phaseolus species; however, no somatic hybridization has been reported for the genus (Veltcheva et al., 2005). Plant Regeneration after Transformation Protocols The application of molecular approaches to plant breeding usually requires an efficient in vitro system to regenerate plants from transformed single cells in order to obtain nonchimeric plants (G ill & Ozias-Akins, 1999). In vitro protocols amenable to molecular breeding have been develope d for a wide range of legume genera: Arachis (Ozias-Akins & Gill, 2001; Vidoz et al., 2006; Rey & Mroginski, 2006); Astragalus (Luo et al., 1999), Cajanus (Singh et al., 2003), Cassia (Agrawal & Sardar, 2006), Cicer (Chakraborti et al., 2006); Dalbergia (Singh & Chand, 2003); Glycine (Tomlin, 2002), Lathyrus (Barik et al., 2005), Lotus (Lombari et al., 2003), Macroptilium (Ezura et al., 2000), Phaseolus (Delgado-Sanchez et al., 2006), Trifolium (Ding et al., 2003) and Vigna (Saini & Jaiwal, 2002). Some ex amples of legume species in which tissue culture has assisted transformation protocols are A. hypogaea (Ozias-Akins & Gill, 2001), Lotus japonicus (Regel) K. Larsen (Lombari et al., 2003), G. max (Olhoft et al., 2003), T. repens T. pratense and T. subterraneum L. (Ding et al., 2003).

PAGE 28

15 Medium and Long-term Germplasm Conservation and Plant Material Exchange As civilization advances, the centers of diversity of ma ny important plants for food and forage are threatened. This situation imp lies the loss of valuable genes contained in the wild relatives of the cult ivated species that could be used in breeding programs. For this reason, germplasm is kept in storage f acilities, mainly as seeds, which require considerable land and labor to be renewe d. For many species belonging to the genus Arachis seed viability decreases abruptly after 2-3 years of storage. However, some protocols have been developed to recover pl ants from seeds that would not germinate by themselves through the in vitro culture of embryonic axes (Dunbar et al., 1993b; Morris, et al., 1995). Cryopreservation constitutes an alternativ e to the laborious and time consuming storage of seeds. Not only does it allow for l ong-term storage, but it also ensures genetic stability, requires little space and is low main tenance (Gagliardi et al., 2003). The ultralow temperatures of liquid nitrogen cause interruption of all bi ochemical reactions protecting the plant material from physiol ogical and genetic changes (Yamada et al., 1991). In addition, plants are kept free from pa thogens when propagated from plants that have been indexed for the presence of specific microorganisms. Protocols for cryopreservation have been deve loped for several species: A. burchellii Krapov. & W.C. Greg., A. hypogaea A. retusa Krapov. et al., (Gag liardi et al., 2003), A. macedoi Krapov. & W.C. Greg., A. pietrarellii Krapov. & W.C. Greg., A. prostrata Benth. A. villosulicarpa (Gagliardi et al., 2002) and T. repens (Yamada et al., 1991) among others. Medium-term conservation of germplasm can al so be done by mainta ining plants under in vitro conditions, which has similar advantages as cryopreservation: little space, low maintenance, and protection from pathogens. Moreover, plants kept in vitro are a ready

PAGE 29

16 source of material in case the production of a large num ber of plants is required (Bhojwani, 1981). Although there are many reports on tissue culture of legume species, there are no in vitro protocols for T. polymorphum T. carolinianum A. bicolor or A. latifolia four promising forage species. For L. bainesii there is only one report of plant regeneration from cotyledons (Bovo et al., 1986). Therefore, the main objective of this research was to develop protocols for plant regeneration of these species that may then be used to improve their forage potential. Medium basal sa lts, plant growth regul ators, explant type and time of exposure were the main factors evaluated.

PAGE 30

17 CHAPTER 3 MATERIALS AND METHODS Procedures common to all experiments are described here. The modifications made for specific experiments are desc ribed in corresponding chapters. Plant Material Experiments were carried out with four sp ecies representing three different genera of the Leguminosae family: A. bicolor A. latifolia L. bainesii T. carolinianum and T. polymorphum (Table 3-1). Seeds were scarified us ing concentrated sulphuric acid (98%) for 5 minutes ( Adesmia spp ., L. bainesii ), 7 minutes ( T. polymorphum ) or 10 minutes ( T. carolinianum ) and then were rinsed for 10 minutes in running tap wate r. Subsequently, seeds were surface disinfected by immersi on in a solution of sodium hypochlorite containing 0.571 % W/V available chlorine for 5 minutes and rinsed wi th distilled sterile water three times. Disinfected seeds were placed on half-strengt h Murashige and Skoog (1962) (MS) basal medium, with 15 g L-1 sucrose and 0.7 g L-1 agar (Sigma1 A-1296) in 100 mm diameter x 15 mm deep petri dishes. Culture Conditions Basal medium consisted of either MS L2 (Collins & Phillips, 1982) or B5 (Gamborg et al., 1968). Media were prepared using MS basal salt mixture (Sigma M5524) and MS vitamins (Sigma M7150) mixed in proportions corresponding to Murashige and Skoog (1962), B5 basal salt mixture (Sigma G5768) and B5 vitamins 1Use of brand name is for identification purposes only and does not imply exclusion of other similar brand products.

PAGE 31

18 (RPI G37010) were used in quantities speci fied in Gamborg et al. (1968) or L2 concentrated stock solutions mixed in th e adequate proportions according to Collins & Phillips (1982). Concentrated stock solutions of plant growth regulators were prepared by dissolving the correct quantity of the product {[TDZ= thidiazuron, 1-phenyl-3-(1,2,3thiadiazol-5-yl)urea (Sigma P6186)], [BAP= benzylaminopurine (Sigma B3408)], [KIN= kinetin, 6-furfurylaminopurine (Sigma K0753)], [PIC= picloram, 4-amino-3,5,6trichloropicolinic acid (Sigma P5575)], [2,4-D= 2,4dichlorophenoxyacetic acid (Sigma D6679)], [IBA= indoleb utyric acid (Sigma I5386)] in distilled water and kept frozen at -14C.The pH of the media was adju sted to 5.8 with the addition of drops of 1 N KOH or 1N HCl before the addition of agar (Sigma A-1296). Culture medium was sterilized by autoclaving for 20 minutes at 0.103 Mpa. For the first steps of all experiments, 100 mm diameter x 15 mm deep petri dishes were used and explants were placed with the abaxial side down on 20 mL of culture medium. After the induction, cultures were tran sferred onto MS medi um with or without the addition of 0.044 M BAP + 0.049 M IBA to achieve bud el ongation and rooting of shoots. To induce further growth of shoots, cultures were subsequently transferred to magenta boxes (76.2 mm x 76.2 mm x 101.6 mm) (Magenta Corporation) containing 50 mL of MS devoid of plant growth regulators. Cultures were kept in a growth chamber at 26 2C with a 16-hour photoperiod and 85 mol m-2 s-1 provided by cool fluorescent lights. Regenerated plants were removed from magenta boxes and rinsed under running tap water to completely remove the culture medium and were then placed in plug trays containing vermiculite and covered with a hum idity dome. Trays were placed in a growth

PAGE 32

19 chamber at 22 2C with a 14-hour photoperiod. Plants were watered daily to keep a high humidity level during the first two week s and a solution containing 2 g/L of Captan [4-cyclohexene-1,2-dicarboximide, N-(t richloromethyl) thio] was applied twice during this period. During the third week, covers were removed gradually for longer periods of time and plants were fi nally transferred to the greenhouse. Evaluation and Experimental Design Cultures were evaluated every 30 days for mo st experiments, in order to determine the number of explants that died, remain ed irresponsive, produced callus or buds. Whenever buds were regenerated, the number of buds per explant was also recorded. Each treatment was applied to 10 explants and experiments were repeated 2-3 times. Experiments were treated as completely ra ndom factorial experiments or completely randomized designs.

PAGE 33

20 Table 3-1. Plant material used as a so urce of explants in the experiments. Species Accession No. Origin A. bicolor U5 Lavalleja (Uruguay) U6 Rocha (Uruguay) U7 Paysandu (Uruguay) U8 Tacuarembo (Uruguay) U10 Paso de los Toros/Tacuarembo (Uruguay) U11 Durazno (Uruguay) U12 Canelones (Uruguay) U13 Rocha (Uruguay) U14 Castillos/Rocha (Uruguay) A. latifolia U17 Valle Eden/Tacuarembo (Uruguay) U18 Mina de Corrales/Rivera (Uruguay) U19 Velsquez/Rocha (Uruguay) T. polymorphum U1 Estancia El Rinc n/Florida (Uruguay) U2 Uruguay U3 Uruguay CPI 87102 Pilar (Paraguay) Rio Grande (Brazil) Uruguay T. carolinianum PI 516273 Gainesville, Florida, USA L. bainesii Cv INIA Glencoe Uruguay U preceding a number is a locally assigned University of Florida number, CPI is Commonwealth Plant Introduction number from Australia and PI is USDA/NPGS Plant Introduction number

PAGE 34

21 CHAPTER 4 TISSUE CULTURE OF Trifolium polymorphum AND T. carolinianum Introduction The genus Trifolium originated in the Mediterr anean region, but subsequently spread to the Americas, Asia and Africa as we ll (Zohary & Heller, 1984). It consists of 8 sections and approximately 240 species, 25 of which are used as forage (Lange & Schifino-Wittman, 2000). T. polymorphum is a highly palatable forage legume native to eastern Argentina, Uruguay, Paraguay, central Chile and s outhern Brazil (Speroni & Izaguirre, 2003). It is an amphicarpic species that produ ces aerial and subterranean flowers on the same individual. It has been reported that the latter produce seeds more profusely, acting as a seed bank, whereas s eed production from aerial flowers may be affected by grazing and insect attacks. Th e above-ground flowers have a morphology that seems to stimulate insect pollination; however, the species does not appear to exhibit selfincompatibility and self-pollination can occur, even before anthesis (Speroni & Izaguirre, 2003). Other workers report that the above-gr ound flowers are almost exclusively crosspollinated (Daniel Real personal communication, 2006). T. carolinianum is an annual species and one of only three cl overs native to the southeastern US. It is self-pollinated and re-seeds abundantly, but due to small pl ant size, has only limited forage potential. Plant regeneration has been achieved in several species of the genus Trifolium including T. repens T.pratense T. subterraneum T. michelianum Savi, T. isthmocarpum Brot. (Ding, et al., 2003), T. nigrescens (Konieczny, 1995), and T. rubens (Grosser & Collins, 1984) via either organogenesis or somatic embryogenesis. Many of these

PAGE 35

22 protocols have used explants consisting of immature zygotic embryos (Maheswaran & Williams, 1984) or seedling derived explants such as hypocotyls and radicles (Heath et al., 1993), cotyledons (Konieczny, 1999), or leaves (Radionenko et al., 1994). However, these explants may not be appropriate for the propagation of selected genotypes in cross pollinated species in which seeds coming from the same plant may exhibit different genotypes. In this case, explants obtained from vegetative tissues in fully developed plants are more suitable for the pr opagation of selected individuals. Trifolium plant regeneration from non-meristematic tissues has been achieved usi ng leaves (Rybcznski, 1997) and petioles (Quesenberry & Smith, 1993). T. polymorphum and T. carolinianum exhibit low seedling vigor and low DM production that limit their forage use. Therefore, in vitro chromosome duplication may be used to increase plant vigor. In addition, ch imeral plants could be avoided provided that plant regeneration is obtained from single ce lls that were previous ly doubled by treatment with chromosome doubling agents such as colchi cine, trifluralin or oryzalin (Quesenberry et al., 2003). Consequently, th e objective of these experime nts was to develop a plant regeneration protocol th at could be used for in vitro research to produce polyploid plants of T. polymorphum and T. carolinianum with increased seedling vigor and DM production. Materials and methods Trifolium polymorphum Seeds from several accessions (Table 3-1) were germinat ed as described in chapter 3. Plants were maintained aseptically in magenta boxes containing MS medium devoid of growth regulators and were transferred a pproximately monthly. Petioles from immature fully expanded leaves were excised and cut on st erilized filter paper into pieces of 5 to 6-

PAGE 36

23 mm length, which were used as explants. Five pieces were placed per Petri dish, onto one of the three basal media prepared as indi cated in chapter 3 with the addition of 4.5 M TDZ. The three treatments were applied to all germinated genotypes and experiments were repeated twice. Incubation conditions we re the same as described in chapter 3 and data was recorded after 30 days of culture. Th e experiment was statistically analyzed as a factorial arrangement in a completely ra ndomized design using PROC GLM from PC SAS (SAS Institute, 2003). Tukeys HSD Multiple Range Test at p 0.05 level was used to compare the means of the basal media for each genotype. Trifolium carolinianum Seeds were scarified and germinated as i ndicated in chapter 3. Cotyledons from 45 1-week old seedlings were excised and cut longitudinally along the midrib into two pieces so that four cotyledon explants were obtained per genotype. Each explant was placed onto MS alone or MS with 10 M TDZ, 10 M BAP or 10 M KIN. Five pieces were placed per petri dish and the identity of the genotypes was maintained. Seedlings without cotyledons were placed onto MS medium and kept in vitro for further experiments. After 30 days of culture, regene rated buds were transferred onto L2 medium supplemented with 1 M TDZ. Incubation conditions we re the same as described in chapter 3. Results and Discussion Trifolium polymorphum After 30 days of culture, the only response obtained was the formation of friable, light brown callus that died after subcu lturing onto the fresh culture medium. The statistical analyses revealed an effect of basal media, genotypes and basal medium x

PAGE 37

24 genotype interaction (Table 4-1). Basal me dium B5 was significantly better than the others for the induction of callus formation in 9 of the 15 genotypes. In this experiment, TDZ was used as the growth regulator sin ce it has a high cytokini n activity (Huetteman & Preece, 1993) and was repor ted to effectively induce or ganogenesis in a number of species of the genus Trifolium and Medicago (Ding et al., 2003). In addition, pieces of petioles were chosen as explants, since this would allow for the propagation and manipulation of selected genotypes. Petioles were successfully used as explants in T. pratense (Quesenberry & Smith, 1993) and T. rubens (McGee et al., 1989). The failure in the regeneration of shoot buds could be due to the plant growth regulator used in the experiment, which may not be adequate to trigger the organogenic process or might have been present in a concen tration toxic for this species. It is also possible that other auxins such as PIC or 2,4-D could be more effective. However, it would be necessary to evaluate a larger num ber of genotypes since there were significant differences among them. Seedlings grew vigorously in vitro after slow germination, which started a week after the scarification and c ontinued for over a month. Nevertheless, after approximately two months in culture, they started to decay producing few leaves even with frequent transfers to fresh medium. This factor limite d the number of replications and experiments that could be carried out with this species. In order to determine if the presence of plant growth regulators in the germination medi um promoted multiple shoot formation, seeds from different genotypes were scarified as in the first experiment and placed onto culture media containing either 10 M TDZ or 1 M BAP. Germination was not enhanced but multiple shoots were produced in some cases (data not shown). Nevertheless, the rate of

PAGE 38

25 growth was very slow, and seedlings becam e chlorotic approximately a month after germination started. Trifolium carolinianum After 30 days of culture, it was observed that all explants placed on the basal medium devoid of plant grow th regulators had died. Among the plant growth regulators that were evaluated in the experiment, KIN was not effective for callus induction or bud formation in any of the 45 genotypes and BA P only resulted in shoot bud formation in one genotype and callus formation in one other. TDZ effectively induced shoot bud organogenesis in 20% of the genotypes and callus formation in another 20% of the explants. Moreover, the mean number of buds was considerab ly low (2.1) suggesting that the species may be recalcitrant to tissue culture (Table 4-2). In all cases, calli were small, friable and light brown colored, but were already dead at the time the data was recorded. Thirty days after transfer, the mean nu mber of buds across genotypes increased markedly from 2.1 to 18.7 and buds began to el ongate although growth was slow (Figure 4-1). To achieve bud elongation, cultures were transferred to L2 me dium because it has a lower salt concentration than MS medium. In addition, the concentration of TDZ was reduced from 10 to 1 M because it has been repor ted that TDZ may inhibit bud elongation (Huetteman & Preece, 1993). Almost all responses were with TDZ, indi cating that this plan t growth regulator would be preferred for i nduction of organogenesis in T. carolinianum. In a previous report, TDZ proved effective fo r shoot bud induction in several Trifolium species (Ding et al., 2003). However, most of the reports on plant regeneration through organogenesis

PAGE 39

26 in this genus mention the use of other plant growth regulators such as BAP (Heath et al., 1993; Konieczny, 1999) and 2-isope ntenyladenine (Konieczny, 2000). Trifolium carolinianum is an annual, self pollinate d species, and therefore it has high homogeneity and homozygosis is expected within popula tions and plants. For this reason, in order to develop a tissue culture pr otocol, cotyledonary explants were used. Considering that seeds from a single plant and even a population should exhibit similar genotypes, this constitutes a suitable explant that is available in large quantities and can be easily disinfected and handled. This is not the case in cross pollinated species because the progeny of an individual plant may not reflec t the trait of interest in the mother plant, which generally limits the use of seed-derived explants. Interestingly, there were unexpected di fferences in response among genotypes in that explants from some genotypes were comp letely irresponsive while others produced up to 35 buds. This might indicate that the popu lation that was used in the study is not highly homogeneous, probably due to the o ccurrence of some cro ss pollination. Another possibility could be that the difference in the responsiveness of the genotypes was caused by the treatment received by the plant material. For example, if some seeds had a thinner coat, the scarification process with sulphuric acid could have affected the cotyledons and their ability to regenerate in vitro Another possible cause of va riation could be size of the cotyledons among seedlings, which may explain the difference in the number of buds in the responsive genotypes. Although it does not explain the variability observed in the experiment, it is possible that the unresponsive ge notypes were more sensitive to the high concentration of salts in the culture medium. In this case, L2 basal medium should also be used for the

PAGE 40

27 induction of organogenesis in this species. Th is would be in contrast to other work on Trifolium spp which showed that the use of MS as the basal medium allowed the development of an efficient protocol for T. repens T.pratense T. subterraneum T. michelianum and T. isthmocarpum (Ding et al., 2003). Conclusions In T. polymorphum a significant interaction betw een genotypes and basal media was observed for callus production. There we re also significant differences among genotypes and culture media. However, the culture media tested to achieve plant regeneration through organogenesis were not effective and yielded only callus. Among the three basal media tested, a higher percentage of callus formation was observed with B5. The lack of shoot organogenesis may have been caused by the type or level of plant growth regulators, and therefore, other cytoki nins or auxins should be tested. Moreover, additional experiments are required in order to determine the best culture conditions to maintain germplasm actively growing in vitro In contrast, T. carolinianum shoot bud formation was achieved in 20% of the genotypes when the culture medium contained 10 M TDZ. This might suggest that in this species a potent cytokinin is required in order to induce this morphogenetic process. Callus formation was observed in another 20% of the genotypes, and the rest remained non-responsive and died. This difference was not expected considering that it is a self pollinated species, and populations are expect ed to be highly homogeneous. Shoot bud elongation occurred in MS supplemented with 1 M TDZ but simultaneously, the number of adventitious buds continued to increase. Additional experiments are being

PAGE 41

28 conducted in order to achieve ro oting of the regenerated shoo ts and an adequate growth of the plantlets that would likely re sult in a higher acclimatization rate ex vitro

PAGE 42

29 Table 4-1. Mean percentage of explants producing callus from petiole pieces of T. polymorphum in three basal media after 30 days of culture. Basal medium Genotype MS L2 B5 CPI.1 0 a* 0 a 20 a CPI.2 90 b 20 a 100 b CPI.3 0 a 10 a 100 b CPI.4 0 a 0 a 80 b CPI.5 0 a 0 a 0 a CPI.6 0 a 0 a 80 b CPI.7 0 a 0 a 0 a CPI.8 0 a 0 a 0 a CPI.9 0 a 0 a 30 b CPI.10 0 a 0 a 100 b CPI.11 0 a 0 a 90 b Urug.1 0 a 0 a 90 b Parag.1 0 a 0 a 90 b Parag.2 0 a 0 a 60 b U 02.1 0 a 0 a 100 b *Within rows, different letters indicate significant differences according to Tukeys HSD Multiple Range test at p 0.05 level. Table 4-2. Number of buds per expl ant in the responsive genotypes of T. carolinianum cultured on medium supplemented with 10 M TDZ after 30 and 60 days of culture. Genotype 30 days of culture 60 days of culture 8 4 35 9 1 8 10 3 21 11 2 14 23 2 22 24 3 28 32 1 5 41 1 13 43 2 22

PAGE 43

30 Figure 4-1. Shoot bud organogenesi s through cotyledon culture of T. carolinianum 15 days after transfer to L2 + 1 M TDZ (bar: 20 mm).

PAGE 44

31 CHAPTER 5 PLANT REGENERATION OF Adesmia latifolia AND A. bicolor Introduction The tribe Adesmieae belongs to the Fab aceae family and consists of only one genus, Adesmia DC., and approximately 240 species endemic to South America (Ulibarri & Burkart, 2000). Most of these species of herbs and shrubs grow in the Andes mountains and semi desert zones in the Patagonia. Some species, such as A. latifolia A. bicolor and A. punctata are considered promising forages because of their ability to grow during the winter season, high crude protein value and high in vitro organic matter digestibility (Tedesco et al., 2000). In addi tion, due to the stoloniferous morphology of plants, they may be used for soil cover a nd erosion control (Coelho & Battistin, 1998). Adesmia bicolor and A. latifolia are cross pollinated species although some self pollination may occur (Tedesco et al., 2000) As a consequence, selected genotypes cannot be propagated through seeds because thei r progeny could segregate for the trait of interest. Even though these species could be multiplied vegetatively using stolons, tissue culture could provide a more rapid and effi cient method of propagation. In addition, an in vitro protocol for plant regeneration from singl e cells, such as organogenesis and somatic embryogenesis, could be used to double th e chromosome number in an attempt to increase plant productivity. Moreover, the de velopment of a tissue culture system to propagate and maintain plants in vitro would prove useful for germplasm exchange (Mroginski et al., 2004b) since plants are protected from pa thogens and do not require a quarantine period. Another contribution of tissu e culture techniques to plant breeding is

PAGE 45

32 the in vitro selection for biotic and ab iotic stresses, which has b een applied in alfalfa for resistance to specific fungal diseases (Dita et al., 2006). It has been suggested that in forage legume populations there is greater heterogeneity in comparison to grain legum e populations, due to the lower selection pressure of high seed producing genotypes (V eltcheva et al., 2005). This condition would result in an easier identification of in vitro responsive genotypes. However, the development of an efficient plant regenera tion protocol implies the regulation of the many factors that influence in vitro responses and not only the genotype. These other factors include selection of an adequate e xplant, based on the objectives of the culture, composition of the basal medium and plan t growth regulators used to induce the morphogenetic response, and conditi ons of incubation (Radice, 2004). Tissue culture protocols have been devel oped for some forage legumes such as T. pratense T. repens (Ding et al., 2003), A. pintoi Krapov. & W.C. Greg. (Rey & Mroginski, 2006), A. glabrata (Vidoz et al., 2006), Lotus corniculatus L. (Akashi et al, 2003), Astragalus melilotoides Pall. (Hou & Jia, 2004) and Macroptilium atropurpureum (DC.) Urb. (Ezura et al., 2000). Nevertheless, currently there are no reports on tissue culture in the genus Adesmia The objective of these experiments was to develop for the first time, an in vitro plant regeneration system that could assist A. bicolor and A. latifolia breeding programs. Materials and Methods Plant Material Seeds of A. bicolor and A. latifolia were scarified, sterilized and germinated as described in chapter 3. Plants were main tained aseptically in magenta boxes on MS medium without the addition of plant grow th regulators. Unless indicated, explants

PAGE 46

33 consisted of leaflets from immature leaves, at approximately 50% of expansion, that were excised from those in vitro grown plants. Basal Media Experiment Seven genotypes of A. bicolor and 16 of A. latifolia were used as explant sources. Leaflets were placed onto the three basal me dia indicated in chapter 3, with the addition of 4.5 M TDZ. Each treatment was applied to 10 leaflets of each genotype and experiments were repeated three times. After 60 days of culture, buds were transferred to magenta boxes containing MS devoid of gr owth regulators for 45 days, where buds elongated and rooted. Incubation and acclim atization of regenerated plants was performed as described in chapter 3. Response variables analyzed were: percent organogenesis (%= number of explants that produced buds/total number of explants *100), mean number of buds per explant ( number of buds per explant/ number of expl ants that produced buds) and regeneration index (index= % shoot bud formation mean number of buds per explant / 100). This index was used in order to evaluate the infl uence of the basal medium on the percentage of shoot bud formation and mean number of buds per explant simultaneously. A higher index value indicates that a genotype is capable of produc ing a higher total number of buds. These response variables were also used in subsequent experiments. This experiment was statistically anal yzed as a factorial arrangement in a completely randomized design using PROC GLM from PC SAS (SAS Institute, 2003). Tukeys HSD Multiple Range Test at p 0.05 was used to compare the means of the basal media for each genotype.

PAGE 47

34 Factorial Experiments with TDZ and BAP Among the responsive genotypes in the basal media experiment, A. latifolia U18.6 and U18.8 were chosen as explant sources fo r subsequent experiments, because their micropropagation rate (2.74 and 3.12 fold in crease per month, respectively) provided adequate amounts of tissue. Explants were placed onto MS supplemented with 0, 1, 10, 30 or 60 M TDZ alone or with the addition of either 0, 0.1 or 1 M IBA, such that 15 treatments were used. These same concen trations and combinations were assayed replacing TDZ by BAP. Each treatment was a pplied to 10 leaflets of each genotype and experiments were repeated twice. After a month, cultures were transferred onto MS + 0.044 M BAP + 0.049 M IBA for 30 days to achieve bud elongation and then to magenta boxes containing MS without growth regulators for the same period of time. Incubation and acclimatization of regenerated plants was carried out as described in chapter 3. Since both genotypes responded similarly, data were analyzed and presented as a combination of the two; however, results for each genotype are presented in the Appendix (Tables A-1 to A-9). Data from s ubsequent experiments were also pooled for genotypes. In addition to the variables men tioned above, shoot number, length of the longest shoot and acclimatization rate (% survival= number of pl ants that survived after a month / number of plan ts transferred to ex vitro conditions *100) were also determined. Statistical analyses were performed as a factorial arrangement in a completely randomized design using PROC GLM from PC SAS (SAS Institute, 2003). Tukeys HSD Multiple Range Test at p 0.05 was used to compare the means of treatments. Regression analysis was performed using Micr osoft Office Excel (Microsoft, 2003).

PAGE 48

35 Induction Time Experiments The same explants and sources from the prev ious experiment were used to evaluate the influence of exposure time to TDZ. Leaflets were placed onto MS + 10 M TDZ for 0, 1, 4, 7, 14, 20 or 30 days and then transfe rred onto MS devoid of plant growth regulators. Each treatment was applied to 10 leaflets of each genotype and experiments were repeated twice. Forty-five days after the initiation of the e xperiment, all cultures were transferred onto fresh medium for 30 da ys, and then into magenta boxes containing the same culture medium. Incubation conditions were the same as described in chapter 3. The experiment was analyzed as a comp letely randomized design using PROC GLM from PC SAS (SAS Institute, 2003). Tukeys HSD Multiple Range Test at p 0.05 was used to compare treatment means. Regression analysis was performed using Microsoft Office Excel (Microsoft, 2003). Additional data for each genotype are presented in Appendix (Tables A-10 to A-12). Type of Explant Experiment The same two genotypes of A. latifolia were used as explant sources. Leaflets were excised and placed onto sterile filter paper where they were divided into petiole, rachis and leaflets. Petioles and rachises were s ubsequently divided into 5-6 mm pieces. All petiole and rachises pieces obtained from each leaf and eight leaflets were placed in each petri dish containing MS + 10 M TDZ. This procedure was repeated 10 times for mature, fully expanded and immature, activel y expanding leaves from both genotypes. Thirty days after the initiation of the expe riment, explants were transferred onto MS medium without growth regulators to achieve bud elongation. The conditions under which cultures were incubated were as those indicated in chapter 3.

PAGE 49

36 Statistical analysis was performed as a factorial arrangement in a completely randomized design using PROC GLM from PC SAS (SAS Institute, 2003). Tukeys HSD Multiple Range Test at p 0.05 was used to compare the means of treatments. Additional data for each genotype separately is presented in Appendix (Table A-13). Results and Discussion Effect of Basal Medium on Shoot Organogenesis After 60 days of culture, shoot bud fo rmation was observed in 18 of the 23 genotypes evaluated (Table 5-1). Four of the non-responsive genotypes (U5.3, U5.5, U12.5 and U13.1) corresponded to A. bicolor and one (U19.3) to A. latifolia Both genotype and basal medium had highly signifi cant effects on the percentage of shoot bud formation. The interaction be tween these factors was al so highly significant. The basal medium MS resulted in a hi gher number of responsive genotypes and was superior to L2 in two of them. The av erage percentage of shoot bud formation across all genotypes was not significantly diffe rent between MS and L2 (22 and 16.6%, respectively); however, both were superior to B5 (5.5%). In general, higher percentages were obtained in those genotypes derived from accession U18 of A. latifolia whereas those corresponding to A. bicolor were the least responsive. For the variable mean number of buds per explant, only genotype was a significant source of variation. This was al so evident when the average number of buds per explant across genotypes is considered. This may indi cate that the basal medium may have had a major influence during the period in whic h explants dedifferentiated or acquired competence to respond to the plant growth regulator stimulus, but once induction had occurred, it had a low influence on the number of buds arising per expl ant. In all cases,

PAGE 50

37 the mean number of shoot buds arising per e xplant was rather low and never higher than five, although up to 20 buds per individual explant were formed in some cases. The regeneration index proved to be us eful in this study involving numerous genotypes since in some cases a high number of buds per explant were produced, but a low percentage of explants was responsive. Even though the identification of highly responsive genotypes was not the main purpose of this experiment, this index proved useful for the selection of genotypes that coul d be used in further experiments to adjust the in vitro plant regeneration protocol. Aver aging regeneration index data over genotypes, the means for MS and L2 were si gnificantly higher than for B5. However, the index masked the effect of genotype x medium interaction observed on percentage, since the statistical analysis revealed only genotype an d basal medium effects. The results of this experiment suggest ed that MS medium produced higher proliferation of shoot buds in A. latifolia and A. bicolor than the other basal media. Although MS was originally developed for callus culture of tobacco (Murashige and Skoog, 1962) and B5 and L2 were developed for legume species (Gamborg et al., 1968; Collins & Phillips, 1982), MS basal medium ha s been successfully used for tissue culture of several legume genera including forages like Trifolium and Medicago (Ding et al., 2003), grain legumes like Cicer (Chakraborti et al., 2006) and Vigna (Saini & Jaiwal, 2002) and trees such as Dalbergia and Cassia (Singh & Chand, 2003; Agrawal & Sardar, 2006). Moreover, shoot bud induction was po ssible using TDZ as the plant growth regulator, which is in agreement with reports on other legume species as A. hypogagea (Akasaka et al, 2000), A. correntina (Burkart) Krapov. & W. C. Greg. (Mroginski et al.,

PAGE 51

38 2004a), Cajanus cajan (L.) Millsp. (Si ngh et al., 2003) and Vigna radiata (L.) R. Wilczek (Mundhara & Rashid, 2006). Regarding the acclimatization ex vitro of regenerated plants, the overall performance of plants obtained in MS trea tment was markedly hi gher (72.4% survival ex vitro ) than those of plants obtained in L2 ( 38.7%) or B5 (45.6%) (Figure 5-1 E). This higher survival rate of plants regenera ted on MS may be due to reduced problems associated with hyperhydricity. One of the fact ors that lead to this condition characterized by morphological and physiological abnormalities is water availability (Hazarika, 2006). The higher salt concentration of MS basal me dium may result in lower water availability for plant material, so that the incidence of hype rhydricity is lower in MS than in L2 or B5 medium. Low survival rates could also be due to other disorders common to plants exhibiting heterotrophic growth in vitro such as a low photosynthetic rate, abnormalities in structure and functioning of stomata, and poor mesophyll and vascular system development (Hazarika, 2006). Influence of TDZ on Organogenesis After 15 days of culture, shoot buds were observed in all plant growth regulator combinations in both genotype 18.6 and 18.8 of A. latifolia. Similarly, TDZ has been successfully used to induce shoot formation in other legume genera; however, in some species such as Vigna radiata (Mundhara & Rashid, 2006), A. hypogaea (Gill & OziasAkins, 1999), Trifolium spp (Ding et al., 2003) and C. cajan (Singh et al., 2003), explants consisted of seedling-derived parts which ar e usually much more responsive than nonjuvenile tissues. In most of these Adesmia explants, callus formation was rare and, in some cases, buds seemed to arise almost directly from th e surface of the explant. This is a desirable

PAGE 52

39 characteristic since prolonged maintenance in tissue culture may result in somaclonal variation (Ozias-Akins & Gill, 2001). For the percentage of explants exhibiting bud organogenesis and mean number of buds per expl ant, there was a highly significant effect for TDZ but not for IBA concentration or its interaction with TD Z concentration. Since IBA effect was not significant, the average ac ross IBA concentrations is presented. Only the treatment without TDZ was significantly diffe red from the rest for the percentage of shoot bud formation. A separate analysis was performed by excluding the 0 TDZ treatment in order to detect differences among TDZ concentrations and acquire a more accurate understanding of the response (Tab les 5-2 and 5-3). Similarly a regression analysis was carried out wit hout considering the 0 TDZ treatment and the simplest model that best explained culture responses wa s chosen in each case. When the 0 TDZ treatment was dropped, numerical ly the percentage adventitious bud formation increased with increasing TDZ concentration at 30 da ys of culture, but this increase was not significant (Table 5-2). By 60 days of culture there was a significant quadratic effect of TDZ concentration (R2=0.96) (Table 5-3 and Figure 5-2). Regardless of TDZ concentration the percentage of responsive explants increased from 30 to 60 days of culture which indicates that some explants required a longer period of time to become competent and differentiate buds (Appendix Tables A-1 and A-3). The same statistical procedur es and considerations descri bed above were applied to the other response vari ables. Even when the 0 TDZ treatment was dropped from the analysis, TDZ concentration did not affect mean number of bu ds per explant at either 30 or 60 days (Tables 5-2 and 5-3). In some cases, the number of buds per explant of A. latifolia U18.8 actually decreased at 60 days of cu lture at higher concentrations of TDZ

PAGE 53

40 (Appendix Table A-3) due to the death of some buds. These bud deaths were probably due to some phytotoxic effect of this potent plan t growth regulator, as reported in peanut (Kanyand et al., 1994). The same regeneration index as in the ba sal media experiment was applied here (Tables 5-2 and 5-3). This index showed a quadratic response with increasing TDZ concentrations at 30 days of culture (R2= 1) (Figure 5-3.), but by 60 days of culture the effect of TDZ concentration had disappeared (Table 5-3). Shoot number (Table 5-3 and Figure 5-4) and shoot length (T able 5-3 and Figure 5-5) s howed a linear d ecrease with increasing concentrations of TDZ (R2= 0.87 and 0.79, respectively) (Figures 5-1 A-D). The reduction in shoot elongation is a common response reported in several species when TDZ is added to the cultur e medium (Huetteman & Preece, 1993). Shoot length is an important factor for the success in ex vitro acclimatization since longer shoots may have more reserves to produce roots which promote higher survival rates (T able 5-3). This was evident in both A. latifolia genotypes (Appendix Tables A-2, A-4 and A-5) where ex vitro survival decreased linearly with in creasing concentrations of TDZ (R2=0.88) (Figure 56). In addition, there was a hi gher incidence of hyperhydricity in plants regenerated in medium containing 30 and 60 M TDZ, proba bly caused by a hormonal imbalance in the culture medium (Hazarika, 2006). Influence of BAP on Organogenesis For most variables considered in this study, the effect of BAP concentration was significant whereas the effect of IBA and the interaction between these factors were not. Consequently, the mean across IBA concentrat ions was obtained and values were treated as in the previous experiment regarding T ukeys test and regression analysis. After 30 days of culture, there was a quadrat ic effect of BAP concentration (R2=0.24) (Figure 5-7)

PAGE 54

41 although the percentage of expl ants that had produced buds was low and some explants remained non-responsive (Table 5-4). By 60 days of culture, the response to BAP concentration remained quadratic (R2=0.57), but the percentage of adventitious bud formation increased in at all concentrations (Table 5-5 and Figure 5-9). This response is similar to what has been reported for A. hypogaea, where the addition of BAP to the culture medium required a longer period to induce shoot organogenesis than when was TDZ was added to the medium (Kanyand et al., 1994). Bud formation occurred in explants of most treatments at 60 days after initiation of cu ltures (Table 5-5 and Appendix Tables A-6 and A-8). Additionally, an increase in the percentage of bud formation occurred in those that had responded earlier. This pattern was also observed in the number of buds per explant. Similar to percentage of bud organogenesis, regeneration index response to increasing BAP concentra tion after 30 days of culture was quadratic (R2=0.25) (Figure 5-8) being highe st for explants placed onto 10 M BAP. After 60 days of culture, the regeneration inde x response was still quadratic (R2=0.48) (Figure 5-11), but the index values were significantly lowe r for explants cultured onto 1 M BAP than for those placed onto 10-60 M BAP (Tables 5-4 and 5-5). For mean number of buds per explant, there were no differences among treatments after 30 days of culture, but after 60 days the response to BAP concentrations was quadratic (R2=0.56) (Tables 5-4 and 5-5, Figure 5-10). At 90 days of culture, shoot length also exhibited a quadratic re sponse to BAP concentration (R2=0.50) (Figure 5-12), reaching a maximum at 10-30 M BAP and then decreased (Table 5-5, Appendix Tables A-7 and A-9). This reduction in length at hi gh levels of the plant growth regulator may

PAGE 55

42 have resulted from the induction of numerous shoot primordia that competed among each other and/or to the higher nu mber of hyperhydric shoots. The addition of BAP to basal medium has proved useful to induce organogenesis in some legume genera such as Desmodium (Rey & Mroginski, 1997), Aeschynomene (Rey & Mroginski, 1996) and Trifolium (Heath et al., 1993). Interestingly, BAP was less effective than TDZ for shoot bud induction in A. latifolia This is in agreement with a report in A. hypogaea in which several cytokinins were tested but TDZ proved to be the most efficient (Akasaka et al., 2000). Induction Time for Adventitious Bud Formation In order to determine the minimum time of exposure to TDZ required for shoot bud induction in A. latifolia explants were maintained in a culture medium supplemented with this plant growth regulator for increasi ng periods of time. It was observed that one and four days of culture were enough to induce organogenesis in A. latifolia U18.8 and U18.6, although with a very low percentage of bud formation (Appendix Tables A-10 and A-11). In general, the percentage of bud organogene sis increased as explants remained for longer periods of time in contact with TD Z. There were no significant differences between the 1and 4-day treatments or am ong 7to 30-day treatments (Table 5-6). An increase in the percentage of responsive e xplants was also observed from 30 to 60 days after the initiation of cultures. This suggests that, as in the cas e of four to seven days of exposure to TDZ, a period of over 30 days ma y be required for buds to arise even though cells have been induced to follow this deve lopmental pathway. In most cases the mean number of buds per explant increased from 30 to 60 days after the in itiation of cultures. Exceptions to this were the case when some buds became stunted and died. However,

PAGE 56

43 there were no significant differences in mean bud number when e xplants were placed between on TDZ 4 and 30 days (Table 5-6). Re garding the regeneration index, there were significant differences between 1 or 4 days on TDZ and 7 to 30 days on the medium with this plant growth regulator after 30 days of culture. Thirty days la ter, the highest index value was observed for the longest treatment, but it was not significan tly different from 7 to 20 days of culture on TDZ. Several studies showed that in order to regenerate normal shoots in A. hypogaea explants should not remain in a medium supplemented with TDZ for more than 7 days at 45.4 M TDZ or 21 days at 4.54 M TDZ (A kasaka et al., 2000). In A. latifolia there were no significant differences in shoot length after culture of explants on TDZ for 1 to 30 days (data not s hown). Regression analysis for all response variables showed a quadratic increase for length of time on TDZ supplemented medium (R2 from 0.80 to 0.95) (Figures 5-13 to 5-15 and Appendix Figures A-1 to A-3). Another experiment was conducted with s horter intervals betw een treatments to determine more precisely the number of days re quired for buds to arise. The percentage of shoot bud formation was highest for 10 da ys of culture on TDZ containing medium; however, it was not significantly different from percentages obta ined after 5 to 9 days of culture on TDZ (Table 5-7). There were no differences among treatments regarding the mean number of buds per explant, and th e regeneration index showed a significant difference only between 10 days of culture on TDZ and 1 or 2 days of exposure to this plant growth regulator but not with longer exposures (T able 5-7). In addition, the percentages of response were lower than in the first experiment (Appendix Table A-12). Regression analysis showed a linear increase of percentage of shoot bud formation and regeneration index with in creasing exposure to TDZ (R2= 0.92 and 0.93, respectively)

PAGE 57

44 (Figures 5-16 and 5-17), but th is is probably because treatmen ts corresponded to the first phase of the quadratic model obser ved in the previous experiment. Effect of Explant Type on Shoot Organogenesis Results from an exploratory experi ment with several genotypes of A. latifolia revealed that leaflets were more responsive th an petioles, suggesting that the part of the leaf used as explant had a major influence on the in vitro responsiveness. The percentage of bud formation was significantly higher when r achises were used as explants (Table 58). Leaflet explants produced a significantly higher per centage of organogenesis than petioles, which in general remained non-re sponsive. In the best case, only 16% organogenesis was achieved in contrast to the 90% responsiveness that was obtained using rachises from immature leaflets (Appendix Table A-13 ). These response patterns were observed in both immature and mature l eaves. Mean number of buds per explant and bud formation index also showed the higher responsiveness of rachises over the other two types of explants. For these response vari ables, there were no significant differences between leaflet and petiole explants (Table 5-8). The higher frequency of shoot bud formati on from rachises may be due to the presence of intercalary meristems in the rachis es because they are the last segment of the leaf to undergo the maturation process. Neve rtheless, this does not explain that this explant, when excised from mature leaves, gave almost as high responses as when harvested from actively expanding ones. The onl y disadvantage of using rachises would be the lower amount of plant material in cases in which few or small plants are available, since each leaf provides between 10 to 20 leaf lets, but each rachis from immature leaves gives no more than two explants.

PAGE 58

45 Regarding explant age, there were no si gnificant differences between immature and mature leaves although explants from expandi ng leaves were more responsive than those from fully expanded, mature ones. This may be due to the meristematic activity of young leaves with less differentiated cells that could readily respond to an external stimulus, i.e. TDZ. In A. hypogaea leaf developmental stage is a primary factor in somatic embryo induction, as unfolded leaflets usually lose embryogenic pot ential (Baker & Wetzstein, 1998). Nevertheless, shoot bud formation was possible in a number of wild Arachis species (Dunbar & Pittman, 1992). In contrast to what might be expected, cotyledons of A. bicolor and A. latifolia were completely irresponsive in vitro when cultured onto PIC, 2,4-D or TDZ (data not shown). Conclusions It was possible to achiev e plant regeneration from A. latifolia and A. bicolor through immature leaflet culture. Shoot bud organogenesis was successfully induced in several genotypes of both species using MS, L2 or B5 as the basal medium. Even though there were no marked differences in bud formation frequency between MS and L2, the former one promoted a higher ex vitro survival of regenerated plants and therefore was used in subsequent experiments. Interestingly, A. bicolor proved to be much less responsive than A. latifolia and all regenerated plan ts failed to acclimatize ex vitro. The plant growth regulator TDZ was more efficient than BAP for shoot bud induction, not only in the fre quency of bud formation, but al so in the time required for buds to arise from explants. In general, th e percentage of organoge nesis increased with higher levels of TDZ, but this was associat ed with a reduction in bud elongation. Shoot length was a critical factor in ex vitro acclimatization of regenerated plants and as a consequence, plants originated in TDZ concentrations of 1 and 10 M showed higher

PAGE 59

46 survival rates. Despite the lower organogenesis frequency of explants cultured on BAP, this plant growth regulator did not affect shoot length as drastically as TDZ, and in general the most effective concentrations were 10 and 30 M BAP. Shoot bud organogenesis was observed after ex posures to TDZ as short as one day, although the percentage of bud formation incr eased with prolonged culture in a medium containing this plant growth regulator up to 10 days. Exposure for 30 days to 10 M TDZ allowed a higher frequency of organogenesis a nd did not show a negative effect in shoot elongation, which was observed in the previous experiment at higher levels of the plant growth regulator. A major influence of explant type on shoot bud formation of A. latifolia was revealed in a follow-up experiment. A higher frequency of shoot bud formation and mean number of buds per explant was obtained when rachises were used as explants. The age of the source leaf was not as important as the part of the leaf placed into culture. Nevertheless, an increase in bud formation was achieved when using explants from immature, expanding leaves instead of mature, fully expanded ones. A suggested protocol for A. latifolia plant regeneration is as follows: 1. Use immature rachises as explant sour ce (immature leaflets may be used with some reduction in efficiency if large amounts of explant tis sue are desired) 2. Culture on MS + 10 M TDZ for 20 days 3. Transfer to MS with no plant growth regulators for bud elongation and rooting

PAGE 60

47 Table 5-1. Effect of three basal media on per centage of adventitious bud formation (%), mean number of buds (No.) and regeneration index (Index) in A. bicolor (U5.2-U13.3) and A. latifolia (U17.1-U19.6) after 60 days of culture. Genotype Basal Medium MS L2 B5 % No. Index% No. Index % No. Index U5.2 3.3 a* 1.7 0.2 a 3.0 a 1.0 0.1 a 0 a 0 0 a U5.3 0 a 0 0 a 0 a 0 0 a 0 a 0 0 a U5.5 0 a 0 0 a 0 a 0 0 a 0 a 0 0 a U12.2 0 a 0 0 a 3.3 a 0.7 0.1 a 0 a 0 0 a U12.5 0 a 0 0 a 0 a 0 0 a 0 a 0 0 a U13.1 0 a 0 0 a 0 a 0 0 a 0 a 0 0 a U13.3 6.7 a 0.7 0.1 a 3.3 a 0.3 0 a 3.3 a 0.3 0 a U17.1 50.0 b 1.9 1.1 a 6.7 a 1.7 0.2 a 3.3 a 0.3 0 a U17.2 53.3 b 3.7 1.9 a 26.7 ab 2.8 1.1 a 16.7 a 1.1 0.3 a U17.3 3.3 a 0.3 0 a 0 a 0 0 a 0 a 0 0 a U18.1 63.8 ab 3.6 1.8ab 80.0 b 3.4 2.9 b 36.7 a 2.9 1.0 a U18.2 78.6 b 2.3 1.9 b 37.2 a 3.7 1.5ab 13.3 a 0.8 0.2 a U18.3 17.4 a 2.2 0.4 a 24.4 a 1.9 0.5 a 3.3 a 1 0.1 a U18.4 23.3 a 0.7 0.5 a 16.7 a 1.1 0.6 a 0 a 0 0 a U18.6 56.7 b 1.6 0.9 a 46.7 1.2 0.8 a 6.7 a 0.3 0.1 a U18.8 46.7 b 2.6 1.1ab 80.0 b 3.9 2.6 b 13.3 a 4.1 0.8 a U18.9 53.3 b 2.1 1.3 a 23.3 ab 1.6 0.4 a 16.4 a 0.7 0.2 a U19.1 3.3 a 0.3 0 a 0 a 0 0 a 0 a 0 0 a U19.2 3.3 a 0.3 0 a 3.3 a 1.7 0.2 a 0 a 0 0 a U19.3 0 a 0 0 a 0 a 0 0 a 0 a 0 0 a U19.4 5.6 a 0.5 0.1 a 4.2 a 0.3 0 a 0 a 0 0 a U19.5 13.3 a 0.6 0.2 a 0 a 0 0 a 3.3 a 0.3 0 a U19.6 23.3 a 3.9 2.7 b 23.3 a 1.8 1.2ab 9.1 a 1.6 0.4 a Mean 22.0 B 1.3A 0.6B 16.6B 1.2A 0.5B 5.5A 0.6A 0.1A Within rows, means for a given variable followed by different lower case letters indicate significant differences according to Tukeys HSD Multiple Range Test at p 0.05 level. Means over genotypes followed by differe nt upper case letters indicate significant differences according to Tukeys HSD Multiple Range Test at p 0.05 level. Index= % shoot bud formation x mean number of buds / 100

PAGE 61

48 Table 5-2. Effect of TDZ concentration on pe rcentage of adventitious bud formation (ABF), mean number of buds per ex plant, and regeneration index (Index) in A. latifolia after 30 days of culture. TDZ (M) ABF Buds Index ---%-----No.--0 0 0 0 1 52.5a* 1.7a 0.9a 10 57.5a 1.9a 1.1a 30 67.5a 2.0a 1.4ab 60 71.7a 2.3a 1.6b Within columns, different letters indicate significant differences according to Tukeys HSD Multiple Range Test at p 0.05. Index= % shoot bud formation x mean number of buds / 100 Table 5-3. Effect of TDZ concentration on pe rcentage of adventitious bud formation (ABF), mean number of buds per ex plant, and regeneration index (Index) after 60 days of culture; number of s hoots and shoot length after 90 days of culture; and percentage of ex vitro survival in A. latifolia TDZ (M) ABF Buds Index Shoots Length Survival --%----No.-----No.----mm-------%----0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 65.8a* 2.7a 1.7 a 10.4c 31.3c 76.5b 10 79.2 ab 2.8a 2.3 a 7.8bc 18.2b 60.3b 30 87.5 b 2.5a 2.2 a 4.5ab 5.3ab 15.0a 60 85.8 b 2.7a 2.4 a 3.3a 2.6a 4.2a Within columns, different letters indicate significant differences according to Tukeys HSD Multiple Range Test at p 0.05. Index= % shoot bud form ation x mean number of buds / 100

PAGE 62

49 Table 5-4. Effect of BAP concentration on pe rcentage of adventitious bud formation (ABF), mean number of buds per ex plant and regeneration index (Index) in A. latifolia after 30 days of culture. BAP ( M) ABF Buds Index ---%-----No.--0 0 0 0 1 2.5a* 0.3 a 0 a 10 18.3b 0.8 a 0.2 b 30 1.7a 0.2 a 0 a 60 0.8a 0.1 a 0 a Within columns, different letters indicate significant differences according to Tukeys HSD Multiple Range Test at p 0.05. Index= % shoot bud form ation x mean number of buds / 100 Table 5-5. Effect of BAP concentration on pe rcentage of adventitious bud formation (ABF), mean number of buds per ex plant and regeneration index (Index) after 60 days of culture; and shoot le ngth after 90 days of culture in A. latifolia BAP ( M) ABF Buds Index Length --%----No.-----mm--0 0 0 0 0 1 13.3a* 1.4 a 0.2 a 15.0 a 10 65.8 b 3.2 b 2.2 b 41.7 b 30 57.5 b 2.9 b 1.7 b 30.0 ab 60 50.0 b 2.9 b 1.6 b 17.5 a Within columns, different letters indicate significant differences according to Tukeys HSD Multiple Range Test at p 0.05. Index= % shoot bud form ation x mean number of buds / 100

PAGE 63

50 Table 5-6. Effect of different times of e xposure to TDZ on bud formation percentage (ABF), mean number of buds per ex plant and regeneration index (Index) in A. latifolia after 30 and 60 days of culture, respectively. 30 days of culture 60 days of culture Days in TDZ ABF Buds Index ABF Buds Index ---%-----No.-----%-----No.--0 0 a 0 a 0 a 0 a 0 a 0 a 1 2.5 a 0.3 a 0 a 2.5 a 0.3 ab 0 a 4 12.5 a 0.8 ab 0.2 a 30.0 a 2.1 bc 0.6 ab 7 57.5 b 2.0 bc 1.2 b 77.5 b 2.0 bc 1.5 abc 14 70.0 b 1.7 bc 1.2 b 77.5 b 2.5 c 2.0 bc 20 72.5 b 2.6 c 1.9 b 87.5 b 2.3 c 2.0 bc 30 80.0 b 1.8 bc 1.4 b 90.0 b 2.8 c 2.5 c Within columns, different letters indicate significant differences according to Tukeys HSD Multiple Range Test at p 0.05. Index= % shoot bud form ation x mean number of buds / 100 Table 5-7. Effect of short exposure to TDZ on bud formation percentage (ABF), mean number of buds per explant and regeneration index (Index) in A. latifolia after 30 days of culture. Days in TDZ ABF Buds Index ---%-----No.--0 0 a 0 a 0 a 1 0 a 0 a 0 a 2 2.5 a 0.3 a 0 a 3 5.0 a 0.5 a 0.1 ab 4 5.0 a 1.0 a 0.1 ab 5 7.5 ab 0.8 a 0.1 ab 6 12.5 ab 0.8 a 0.2 ab 7 17.5 ab 1.1 a 0.2 ab 8 20.0 ab 1.4 a 0.3 ab 9 27.5 ab 1.4 a 0.4 ab 10 35.0 b 0.9 a 0.4 b Within columns, different letters indicate significant differences according to Tukeys HSD Multiple Range Test at p 0.05. Index= % shoot bud form ation x mean number of buds / 100

PAGE 64

51 Table 5-8. Effect of explant type on bud form ation percentage (ABF ), mean number of buds per explant and regeneration index (Index) in A. latifolia after 30 days of culture. Type of explants Immature leaves Mature leaves Mean Petioles 9.1 8.0 8.6 a Rachis 80.0 65.0 72.5 c ABF ---%--Leaflets 38.1 20.6 29.4 b Petioles 0.8 0.4 0.6 a Rachis 2.3 2.7 2.5 b Buds --No.-Leaflets 1.2 1.0 1.1 a Petioles 0.2 0.1 0.15 a Rachis 2.3 2.7 2.5 b Index Leaflets 0.6 0.3 0.5 a Within columns, different letters indicate significant differences according to Tukeys HSD Multiple Range Test at p 0.05. Index= % shoot bud fo rmation x mean number of buds / 100

PAGE 65

52 A B C D E Figure 5-1. Organogenesis in A. latifolia A), B) Shoot bud formation 60 days after initiation of cultures and C), D) shoot elongation 90 days af ter initiation of cultures; A), C) in MS + 1 M TDZ and B), D) in MS + 60 M TDZ (bar: 20 mm). E) Successful acclimatization of regenerated plants, 45 days after transfer to ex vitro conditions (Bar: 50 mm).

PAGE 66

53 Figure 5-2. Regression curve showing the effect of TDZ concentration on percentage of adventitious bud formation (%) in A. latifolia after 60 days of culture. Figure 5-3. Regression curve showing the eff ect of TDZ concentration on regeneration index (Index) in A. latifolia after 30 days of culture. y = -0.0144x2 + 1.1876x + 66.162 R2 = 0.96 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 010203040506070 TDZ (micromolar) % y = -1E-04x2 + 0.0182x + 0.8968 R2 = 1 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 1.2 1.4 1.6 1.8 010203040506070 TDZ (micromolar)Index

PAGE 67

54 Figure 5-4. Regression curve showing the eff ect of TDZ concentration on shoot number per explant (No. shoots) in A. latifolia after 90 days of culture. Figure 5-5. Regression curve showing the effect of TDZ concentration on shoot length (Length) in A. latifolia after 90 days of culture. y = -0.4487x + 25.642 R2 = 0.79 -5 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 010203040506070 TDZ (micromolar)Length (mm) y = -0.1159x + 9.4273 R2 = 0.87 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 010203040506070 TDZ (micromolar)No. Shoots

PAGE 68

55 Figure 5-6. Regression curve showing the effect of TDZ concentration on acclimatization rate (% survival) in A. latifolia after 30 days of transfer to ex vitro conditions. Figure 5-7. Regression curve showing the effect of BAP concentration on percentage of adventitious bud formation (%) in A. latifolia after 30 days of culture. y = -1.2482x + 70.534 R2 = 0.88 -10 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 010203040506070 TDZ (micromolar)% survival y = -0.0031x2 + 0.0434x + 8.2682 R2 = 0.24 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 010203040506070 BAP (micromolar) %

PAGE 69

56 Figure 5-8. Regression curve showing the eff ect of BAP concentration on regeneration index (Index) in A. latifolia after 30 days of culture. Figure 5-9. Regression curve showing the effect of BAP concentration on percentage of adventitious bud formation (%) in A. latifolia after 60 days of culture. y = -0.0364x2 + 2.6051x + 22.813 R2 = 0.57 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 010203040506070 BAP (micromolar) % y = -3E-05x2 + 9E-05x + 0.0986 R2 = 0.25 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.3 010203040506070 BAP (micromolar)Index

PAGE 70

57 Figure 5-10. Regression curve showing the eff ect of BAP concentration on mean number of buds per explant (No. Buds) in A. latifolia after 60 days of culture. Figure 5-11. Regression curve showing the eff ect of BAP concentration on regeneration index (Index) in A. latifolia after 60 days of culture. y = -0.0011x2 + 0.086x + 1.7276 R2 = 0.56 0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 3.5 4.0 010203040506070 BAP (micromolar)No. Buds y = -0.0011x2 + 0.0825x + 0.6343 R2 = 0.48 0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 010203040506070 BAP (micromolar)Index

PAGE 71

58 Figure 5-12. Regression curve showing the eff ect of BAP concentration on shoot length (Length) in A. latifolia after 90 days of culture. Figure 5-13. Regression curve sowing the e ffect of exposure to TDZ on bud formation percentage (%) in A. latifolia after 60 days of initiation of cultures. y = -0.0195x2 + 1.0944x + 20.841 R2 = 0.50 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 010203040506070 BAP (micromolar)Length (mm) y = -0.1948x2 + 8.6392x + 1.817 R2 = 0.91 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 05101520253035 Days in TDZ %

PAGE 72

59 Figure 5-14. Regression curve sowing the eff ect of exposure to TD Z on mean number of buds per explant (No. Buds) in A. latifolia after 60 days of initiation of cultures. Figure 5-15. Regression curve sowing the e ffect of exposure to TDZ on regeneration index (Index) in A. latifolia after 60 days of initiation of cultures. y = -0.0052x2 + 0.2274x + 0.3826 R2 = 0.80 0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 05101520253035 Days in TDZNo. Buds y = -0.0036x2 + 0.1875x + 0.0024 R2 = 0.95 0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 05101520253035 Days in TDZIndex

PAGE 73

60 Figure 5-16. Regression curve sowing the effect of short exposures to TDZ on percentage of bud formation (%) in A. latifolia after 30 days of initiation of cultures. Figure 5-17. Regression curve sowing the effect of short exposures to TDZ on regeneration index (Index) in A. latifolia after 30 days of initiation of cultures. y = 3.3636x 4.7727 R2 = 0.92 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 024681012 Days in TDZ % y = 0.0418x 0.05 R2 = 0.93 0 0.05 0.1 0.15 0.2 0.25 0.3 0.35 0.4 0.45 024681012 Days in TDZIndex

PAGE 74

61 CHAPTER 6 PLANT REGENERATION OF Lotononis bainesii Introduction The genus Lotononis consists of approximately 150 species, from herbs to small shrubs, belonging to the Fabaceae family, tribe Crotalarieae (Jaftha et al ., 2002). Their broad distribution from Southern Africa to the Med iterranean region and India indi cates that these species grow under dissimilar environments from the climat ological and geographical point of view. Among Lotononis species, L. divaricata (Eckl. & Zeyh.) Benth., L. tenella (E. Mey.) Eckl. & Zeyh. and L. laxa Eckl. & Zeyh. have forage potential for arid areas, and L. bainesii Baker a perennial herb, is a valuable forage in Australia (Jaftha et al., 2002). The increasing in terest in this species has motivated some recent molecular studies to determine its mode of reproduction to assist breeding programs (Real et al., 2004). These st udies have reported that, although it has been previously considered a cleistoga mous species, it should be treated as an allogamous species in improvement programs. Some seed may be produ ced by self pollination, but self incompatibility may also be found in some genotypes. Due to the allogamous nature of L. bainesii seeds from a certain plant may correspond to different genotypes. Therefore, specific genotypes cannot be pr opagated through seeds and other means of multiplication would be useful. This coul d be overcome if a plant regeneration protocol is developed that allows the propagation of selected plants. One such protocol has been developed for L. bainessi by Bovo et al. (1986), who obtaine d a low frequency of plant regeneration from cotyledons and leaflets. Moreov er, a tissue culture protocol may be used to solve another major constraint in this species low seedling vigor, through the duplication of

PAGE 75

62 chromosomes using chromosome d oubling agents such as colchici ne, oryzalin and trifluralin (Quesenberry et al., 2003). Cells with duplicat ed chromosomes would be induced to follow either organogenesis or somatic embryogenesis, producing solid plan ts instead of chimeras that would likely result if other techniques were us ed. In addition, a tissue culture protocol that results in plant regeneration from single ce lls would open the possibility of genetic transformation of this species (Ozias-Akins & Gill, 2001). The objective of these experiments was to develop an efficient tissue culture protocol for L. bainesii which could then be used in genetic improvement programs of the species. Materials and Methods Cotyledon Culture Seeds of L. bainesii cv. INIA Glencoe were scarified and germinated as described in chapter 3. Fifty 1-week-old seedlings were rando mly selected and their cotyledons were excised and cut longitudinally along the midrib into two pi eces so that four cotyledonary explants were obtained per genotype. Each explant was placed w ith the abaxial side down onto MS alone or MS with 4.5 M TDZ, 4.14 M PIC or 4.52 M 2,4-D. Five explants were placed per petri dish and the identity of genotypes was maintained. Seedlings without cotyledons were placed onto MS medium and kept in vitro for subsequent experiments. Afte r 30 days of culture, regenerated buds were subcultured onto MS medium supplemented with 0.044 M BAP + 0.049 M IBA for a month. Developing plants were then transferre d to magenta boxes that contained MS lacking growth regulators for the same pe riod of time before acclimatization ex vitro Incubation and acclimatization were the same as those described in chapter 3. Leaflet Culture Genotypes used in this experiment were the sa me as in the cotyledon experiment. Explants consisted of pieces of leaflets (ca. 4 mm2) including the midvein, harvested from immature

PAGE 76

63 expanding leaves of each genotype growing under aseptic conditions. Treatments, incubation and acclimatization were the same as in the previous experiment. Type of Explants One of the genotypes that had performed well in the cotyledon experiment was used as the explant source. Leaflets were excised and pl aced onto sterile filter paper where they were divided into petiole, petiole tip (in which the th ree leaflets are inserted) and leaflets. Petiole pieces (divided into 5to 6-mm portions), the petio le tip and three leaflets corresponding to each trifoliate leaf were placed in a petri dish containing MS supplemented with 10 M TDZ. This procedure was repeated 10 times for both mature and immature leaves. Thirty days after the initiation of the experiment, explants were s ubcultured to MS without growth regulators. Incubation conditions were the same as those described in chapter 3. This experiment was statistically analyzed as a fact orial arrangement in a completely randomized design (3 parts of the leaf x 2 stages of development) using PROC GLM from PC SA S (SAS Institute, 2003). Tukeys HSD Multiple Range Test at p 0.05 was used to compare the means of treatments. Results and Discussion Cotyledon Culture In the absence of growth regulators, coty ledon explants on MS basal medium remained non-responsive and gradually turn ed brown. Conversely, after 30 days of culture on medium supplemented with PIC, all genotypes produced li ght brown or light green friable callus of less than 1 cm in diameter. When this callus was transferred onto MS + 0.044 M BAP + 0.049 M IBA, these calli did not show further growth a nd died. Similar results were observed when 2,4-D was used as a growth regulator in the culture medium (Figure 6-1 A,B). However, in six

PAGE 77

64 genotypes, a few short roots were produced from callus on 2,4-D induction medium, but they did not continue growing upon transfer to MS + 0.044 M BAP + 0.049 M IBA. The addition of TDZ to the bud inducti on culture medium re sulted in shoot bud organogenesis in 27 out of 50 genotypes tested (F igure 6-2 A). Callus and bud formation started approximately 7 and 15 days after the initiation of cultures, resp ectively (Figure 6-1 C,D). Callus was in general dark green with dark brown ar eas. Considering only responsive genotypes, the mean number of buds per cotyledonary explant was 13.6. Sixty days after culture, 48% of the total number of buds was capable of regenera ting plants (177 plants/ 367 buds). In some genotypes, the number of plants after 90 days of culture was superior to the number of buds after 30 days, indicating that during th at period new buds were produced and regenerated whole plants (Figure 6-3 A). In other genotypes, not all the buds present after 30 da ys resulted in plant regeneration. Moreover, nine genotypes produced buds but they did not elongate and finally died. The lack of elongation and death of buds probably resulted from the hyperhydricity of tissues, which might have been caused by a horm onal imbalance in the culture medium. It was observed that only 39% of plants transferred to ex vitro conditions were capable of successful acclimatization 30 days after the transfer (Figures 6-1 E and 6-4 A). This low survival rate is likely associated with the high incidence of hype rhydricity in regenerated plants. Besides the influence of plant growth regulators in the cult ure medium, this abnormality may also result from high water availability in the culture ve ssel and low light levels (Hazarika, 2006). The growth regulator, TDZ, has been used for organogenesis and plant regeneration from embryoor seedling-derived explants in several species of legumes including A. hypogaea (Gill & Ozias-Akins, 1999), V. radiata (Mundhara & Rashid, 2006), Trifolium spp. Medicago sp.p

PAGE 78

65 (Ding et al., 2003) and C. cajan (Singh et al., 2003). Neverthe less, in the latter, somatic embryogenesis was obtained at higher concentrat ions of TDZ than t hose that had induced organogenesis. Similarly, there are reports of somatic embryo induction using TDZ in A. hypogaea (Murthy et al., 1995). Interestingly, PIC a nd 2,4-D were not effective for non zygotic embryo induction in L. bainesii but both plant growth regulators we re reported to be effective in A. hypogaea (Griga, 1999). Leaflet Culture Since L. bainesii is an allogamous species and not al l progeny will necessarily reflect the superior performance of an individual plant, coty ledons are not the most suitable explants when the purpose is propagation of out standing genotypes. Therefore, the previous experiment was repeated using leaflets as explants, since they are available throughout the year and offer the possibility of large scale propagation of sel ected genotypes as well as development of an in vitro chromosome doubling protocol. Thirty days after the initiation of cultures it was observed that, when growth regulators were absent, explants remained irresponsive exce pt in 22 genotypes in which roots up to 10-cm long were produced from the cut surface of the mi dvein. This suggests that the endogenous level of auxins in the leaflets may be enough to i nduce rhizogenesis in the absence of an exogenous supply of plant growth regulators. Probably, the high levels of auxins are responsible for the formation of vigorous roots in plants maintained in vitro not only from basal nodes but also from those not in contact with the culture medium. Some of thes e genotypes corresponded to those that had produced roots from callus in the pr evious experiment. When the culture medium contained PIC or 2,4-D, responses were similar to those observed in the cotyledon experiment. Although some calli were larger (up to 1.5 cm in di ameter), they did not exhibit further growth

PAGE 79

66 when transferred onto MS + 0.044 M BAP + 0.049 M IBA. The addition of 2,4-D resulted in root formation in seven genotypes as well. The growth regulator, TDZ, was effective in inducing shoot bud organog enesis in 45 out of 50 genotypes tested, four of which were also non-responsive in the cotyledon experiment. However, the mean number of buds (3.8) was considerably lower than that obtained when cotyledon pieces were used (13.6) (Figures 6-1 F and 6-2 B). After 90 days of culture, a 22% increase in the number of regenerated plants co mpared to the number of buds at 30 days was observed (211 plants at 90 days vs. 173 buds at 30 days) (Figure 63 B and 6-1 G). This might be due to buds continuing to be formed on MS + 0.044 M BAP + 0.049 M IBA. But since this medium had such a low concentrat ion of plant growth regulators, more probably these buds were already induced before the subculture. Even thou gh the total number of plants obtained from leaflet culture was higher than that for coty ledons, only 21% were su ccessfully acclimatized when transferred ex vitro (Figure 6-4 B). This high plant mortality was likely due to hyperhydricity, of which numerous plants showed symptoms; however, manipulation of culture conditions might have resulted in higher survival ra tes. It is possible that the vigorous growth of in vitro regenerated plants resulted in high ethyle ne accumulation, which has been reported to favor hyperhydricity (Hazarika, 2006). It is interesting that more genotypes were res ponsive when explants consisted of leaflets rather than cotyledons. In general, juvenile expl ants are preferred since they are more likely to undergo organogenesis or somatic em bryogenesis. For example, in A. hypogaea seedlings more than 21-days old failed to undergo somatic embryoge nesis using TDZ compared to up to 97% of 6-day-old seedlings (Murt hy et al., 1995). The lowe r cotyledon response in L. bainesii may have been caused by the scarification/surface disinfecti on procedures seed received, although this is

PAGE 80

67 unlikely given that much stronger pretreatment s have been reported with no negative effects (Bovo et al, 1986). These authors obta ined better responses with coty ledons as explants (66% of bud formation in the best culture medium vs. 54 % when using leaflets). In the present study, however, a higher frequency of organogenesis wa s obtained following leaflet culture (90% of explants producing buds vs. 54% of cotyledon pi eces producing buds). A dditionally, results in this experiment differ from those reported by Bovo et al. (1986) in that shoots readily rooted in spite of being in a culture medi um with the potent cytokinin TDZ so rooting was not a critical factor in whole plant regeneration. Veltcheva et al. (2005) suggest that forage legume populations are markedly heterogeneous, re sulting in an easie r identification of in vitro responsive genotypes. Organogenic genotypes of L. bainesii cv INIA Glencoe were easily identified, which may be due to a shorter breedin g history than those in grain legumes in which the narrow genetic base limits the discovery of regenerating genotypes. Type of Explant Since the previous experiment showed that l eaflets were capable of producing shoot buds in the presence of TDZ in most of the genotype s tested, another experiment was performed to asses the influence of the part and age of the leaf in shoot organogenesis. Callus formation started within a week of initia tion of cultures and shoot buds be gan to arise after 15 days of culture in the six type s of explants used. For percentage of shoot bud formation, leaf part had a significant effect, whereas leaf age and interaction between leaf part and leaf age were not significant (Table 6-1). Bud organogenesis from leaflets was similar (85.8% fr om insertion explants and 83.3% from leaflet explants) and higher than petiole s (48.3%). The number of buds per explant ranged from 1.1 to 3.4 (Table 6-2) but, similar to bud organogenesis pe rcentage, there was no leaf age by leaf part interaction for number of buds per explant (Table 6-1). In contrast to percentage of bud

PAGE 81

68 organogenesis, the mean number of buds per e xplant did not differ among parts of the leaf, but did differ due to leaf age. Explants from immatu re leaves gave a higher number of buds per explant (2.9) than those from ma ture ones (1.5) (Table 6-2). Considering the regeneration inde x, there was a significant effect of the part and age of the leaf but not a significant inte raction (Table 6-1). The mean regeneration index for petiole explants (1.1) was significantly lower than the inde x for leaflet or leaflet insertion area (2.4 in both cases). However, the mean regeneration index for explants from immature leaves (2.4) was significantly higher than the inde x for explants excised from mature leaves (1.5). Leaflet insertion area from immature leaves had th e highest index (3.4) over all combinations. The advantage of using immature leaves has been reported in A. hypogaea in which the frequency of somatic embryo formation decreased considerably as leafle ts unfolded (Baker & Wetzstein, 1998). In A. villosulicarpa the best organogenic frequenc y and mean number of buds per explant were obtained when mature fully ex panded leaves were used as explants (Dunbar & Pittman, 1992). In L. bainesii Bovo et al. (1986) reported up to 54% bud formation when pieces of fully expanded leaflets from greenhouse grow n plants were placed onto the best culture medium. Although these authors us ed larger explants (6 mm2), organogenesis frequency was lower than in the present experiment. This c ould be due to the condi tions under which mother plants were grown, a fact or that greatly affects in vitro responsiveness (Radice, 2004). Conclusions It was possible to regenerate plants from over 50% of L. bainesii cv INIA Glencoe genotypes that were evaluated through cotyledon cultu re and 90% of genot ypes through leaflet culture in a medium composed of MS +4.5 M TDZ. Bud elonga tion and rooting was obtained upon transfer onto MS + 0.044 M BAP + 0.049 M IBA. Although immature leaflet culture

PAGE 82

69 resulted in a higher number of responsive ge notypes, plants regenerated from cotyledons exhibited a higher survival rate when transferred to ex vitro conditions. Nevertheless, in both cases survival rates were low a nd this situation was related with the incidence of hyperhydricity in cultures. When the culture medium was supplem ented with either PIC or 2,4-D, friable light green or light brown callus form ation was obtained, but this callu s did not show further growth when subcultured. Regarding the type of explants, the expe riment carried out with one genotype of L. bainesii revealed that leaflet insertion areas from expa nding leaves and pieces of leaflets were more efficient for shoot bud induction. For both mature a nd immature leaves, the lowest frequencies of shoot bud formation were obtained when pieces of petioles were used as explants. Mean number of buds per explant and regenera tion index were higher for expl ants collected from immature leaves. A suggested protocol for L. bainesii plant regeneration is as follows: 1. Use immature leaflets as explants, which are as efficient as leafle t insertion areas but a larger amount of tissue is obtained per leaf 2. Culture on MS + 4.5 M TDZ for 30 days 3. Transfer to MS + 0.044 M BAP + 0.049 M IBA for bud elongation and rooting Although these experiments have improved the regeneration frequency reported for this species, it is likely that the optim ization of other factors besides the type of explant would result in a more efficient protocol. Additional experi ments regarding the regu lation of plant growth regulator concentrations and combinations time required for organogenesis induction and control of factors that influe nce hyperhydricity will be conducted to increase the regeneration frequency and ex vitro establishment rate.

PAGE 83

70 Table 6-1. ANOVA table showing th e p-values corresponding to th e effect of explant type on bud formation percentage (%), mean number of buds per explant (No.) and regeneration index (Index) in L. bainesii after 30 days of culture. Source df p-value % No. Index Leaf parts 2 0.004 0.606 0.032 Leaf age 1 0.454 0.003 0.048 LP x LA 2 0.120 0.294 0.119 Error 54 Index=( % shoot bud formation x mean number of buds) / 100 Table 6-2. Effect of explant type on bud formati on percentage, mean number of buds per explant and regeneration index in L. bainesii after 30 days of culture. Leaf part Immature Mature Mean Petioles 38.3 58.3 48.3b* Leaflet insertion 100.0 71.5 85.8a Leaflets 90.0 76.7 83.4a Bud formation % Mean 76.1A 68.8 A Petioles 2.2 1.6 1.9 a Leaflet insertion 3.4 1.1 2.3 a Leaflets 3.0 1.8 2.4 a Number of buds Mean 2.9A 1.5B Petioles 1.0 1.2 1.1b Leaflet insertion 3.4 1.4 2.4a Leaflets 2.8 1.9 2.4a Regeneration index Mean 2.4A 1.5B For each parameter, means within columns (a,b,c) or rows (A,B) with diffe rent letters indicate significant differences according to Tukeys HSD Multiple Range Test at p 0.05. Index= (% shoot bud formation x mean number of buds) / 100

PAGE 84

71 Figure 6-1. Organogenesis in L. bainesi. A) Cotyledon cultures 20 days after initiation of experiments in MS basal media supplemente d with 2,4-D, B) PIC and C) TDZ (bar: 20 mm). D) Shoot bud formation from cotyle dons 45 days after culture (bar: 20 mm). E) Plants successfully acclimatized 45 days after transfer to ex vitro conditions (Bar: 50 mm). F), G) Shoot bud proliferation from leaflet explants orig inated in MS + 10 M TDZ 60 and 90 days after initiation of cultures, respec tively (bar: 20 mm). B E F G A C D

PAGE 85

72 Figure 6-2. Number of buds produced per explant by 50 genotypes of L. bainesii after 30 days of culture from A) cotyledon and B) leaflets. Figure 6-3. Number of plants produced per ex plant after 90 days of culture by responsive genotypes of L. bainesii through A) cotyledon an d B) leaflet culture. 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 4501-910-1920-2930-3940-4950-5960-69Number of budsNumber of g enot yp es 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 4501-910-1920-2930-3940-4950-5960-69Number of budsNumber of g enot yp esA B 0 5 10 15 20 25 3001-910-1920-2930-39Number of plantsNumber of g enot yp es 0 5 10 15 20 25 3001-910-1920-2930-39Number of plantsNumber of g enot yp esA B

PAGE 86

73 Figure 6-4. Number of successfully acclim atized plants in the genotypes of L. bainesii that were capable of plant regeneration through A) cotyledon and B) leaflet culture. 0 5 10 15 20 2501-45-910-1415-19Number of plantsNumber of g enot yp es 0 5 10 15 20 2501-45-910-1415-19Number of plantsNumber of g enot yp esA B

PAGE 87

74 CHAPTER 7 SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS Grain legumes are generally regarded as recalcitrant to in vitro plant regeneration due to a narrow genetic base that results in low genetic variability and a more difficult identification of responsive genotypes. It is thought to be easier to identify in vitro responsive genotypes of forage legumes, because they have usually undergone fewer selection cycles and populations are more heterogeneous (Ve ltcheva et al., 2005). Results reported here concur with this concept si nce shoot bud organogenesis was achieved in 20 to 90% of genotypes in four out of fi ve forage legume species evaluated. Petiole culture of T. polymorphum on three different basal media supplemented with TDZ was not effective to induce bud or ganogenesis, at least for those genotypes tested. Possibly, this species is more recalcitra nt to tissue culture than the others. Further studies will be conducted to determin e the most suitable conditions for in vitro plant growth (using these aseptically grown plants as an explant source) as well as to determine the culture conditions required for shoot bud induction, i.e., basal medium composition, and plant growth regulator type, co ncentration and combinations. In T. carolinianum, an annual native clover species, shoot bud formation was achie ved for the first time through cotyledon culture. Additional experiments are being conducted to achieve further elongation of shoots and rooting, before re generated plants are transferred to ex vitro conditions to evaluate the establishment rate. In A. bicolor, A. latifolia and Lotononis bainesii plant regeneration was achieved via organogenesis in 54 to 90% of the genotypes tested. Nevertheless, additional

PAGE 88

75 experiments should be conducted to improve the frequency of bud formation and to reduce the incidence of hyperhydricity in culture, which should result in higher ex vitro survival rates. Overall, MS was a suitable basal medium for shoot bud induction in all species tested, except for T. polymorphum where the only response was callus formation on B5 basal medium. In A. latifolia L2 was as effective as MS for shoot bud organogenesis, but plants regenerated in L2 showed a lower establishment rate when transferred to ex vitro conditions. Among plant growth regulators teste d, TDZ was efficient in all species except T. polymorphum where it only induced callus formation. In A. latifolia shoot bud formation was observed in TDZ concentrati ons ranging from 1 to 60 M. The induction time experiment in A. latifolia revealed that 20 days of culture on medium containing TDZ was sufficient to obtain shoot organogene sis. In agreement with other literature, immature leaf tissues were in general more responsive in L. bainesii and Adesmia spp Immature rachises proved to be superior explants for organogenesis induction in A. latifolia, and leaflet insertion areas or leafle ts from immature leaves were more responsive than pieces of petioles in L. bainesii Although cotyledon cult ure resulted in shoot bud formation in T. carolinianum and L. bainesii in Adesmia spp. cotyledons remained unresponsive. Suggested protocols for th e studied species are: T. carolinianum 1. Cotyledon culture on MS + 10 M TDZ for 30 days 2. Transfer of organogeni c cultures on MS + 1 M TDZ, where new buds continue to arise and short shoots are produced from those buds already differentiated

PAGE 89

76 A. bicolor 1. Immature leaflet culture on MS or L2 + 4.5 M TDZ for 60 days 2. Transfer to MS devoid of plant grow th regulators for 45 days, where buds elongated and rooted. A. latifolia 1. Immature rachis culture on MS + 10 M TDZ for 20 days 2. Transfer to MS with no plant growth regulators for bud elongation and rooting L. bainesii 1. Culture immature leaflets on MS + 4.5 M TDZ for 30 days 2. Transfer to MS + 0.044 M BAP + 0.049 M IBA for bud elongation and rooting In conclusion, in vitro plant regeneration protocol s were developed for four promising legume species. Thes e protocols could be used to assist in breeding programs to improve seedling vigor and DM producti on. This would be important for cattle production in those countries where these sp ecies are native. A dditionally, this may allow the development of a legume alternative to perennial peanut in the state of Florida, since to-date it is the only introduced forage legume speci es that has shown long term persistence. The main drawbacks of pere nnial peanut are its vegetative propagation, which increases the establishment cost, and low production in the year after planting. In contrast, Adesmia spp and L. bainesii cultivars could be propagated through seeds, reducing the cost for farmers. Currently, fi eld studies are being conducted to evaluate field performance of Adesmia spp. and L. bainesii to the Florida environment.

PAGE 90

77 APPENDIX ADDITIONAL TABLES FOR TWO GENOTYPES OF Adesmia latifolia Table A-1. Effect of different combina tions of TDZ and IBA on percentage of adventitious bud formation (ABF) and m ean number of buds per explant in A. latifolia U18.6 after 30 and 60 days of culture. 30 days of culture 60 days of culture IBA ( M) IBA ( M) 0 0.1 1 0 0.1 1 ABF Buds ABF Buds ABF Buds ABF Buds ABF Buds ABF Buds TDZ ( M) % No. % No. % No. % No. % No. % No. 0 0a* 0a 0a 0a 0 a 0a 0a 0a 0a 0a 0a 0a 1 45ab 1.3b 55bc 1.7b 75b 1.7b 70b 3.1bc 60bc 2.2b 85b 2.6b 10 60b 2.8cd 40ab 2b 55b 2b 95b 3.6bc 55b 2.6b 85b 2.4b 30 70b 1.9bc 75bc 2.3b 75b 2.1b 85b 2.1b 80bc 2.8b 85b 2.7b 60 85b 3.1d 100c 1.9b 50b 2.2b 90b 3.7c 95c 2.4b 75b 2.7b Within columns, different letters indicate significant differences according to Tukeys HSD Multiple Range Test at p 0.05 Table A-2. Effect of different combinati ons of TDZ and IBA on regeneration index (Index), number of shoots per explant and shoot length in A. latifolia U18.6 after 60 days of culture. IBA ( M) 0 0.1 1 Index Shoots LengthIndex Shoots LengthIndex Shoots Length TDZ ( M) -No.-mm-No.-mm-No.-mm0 0 a* 0 a 0 a 0 a 0 a 0 a 0 a 0 a 0 a 1 2.2 bc 10 b 25 b 1.3 ab 11 b 25 b 2.3 b 13b 17.5 c 10 3.4 c 13ab 13 b 1.5 ab 10 b 23 b 2 b 8 ab 8 bc 30 1.8 ab 6.5a 5 ab 2.2 b 9 a 6.5 b 2.3 b 8 ab 8 bc 60 3.3 c 9a 4 b 2.3 b 5.5a 4 ab 2.3 b 5 ab 7.5 ab Within columns, different letters indicate significant differences according to Tukeys HSD Multiple Range Test at p 0.05. Index= % shoot bud form ation x mean number of buds / 100

PAGE 91

78 Table A-3. Effect of different combina tions of TDZ and IBA on percentage of adventitious bud formation (ABF) and m ean number of buds per explant in A. latifolia U18.8 after 30 and 60 days of culture. 30 days of culture 60 days of culture IBA ( M) IBA ( M) 0 0.1 1 0 0.1 1 ABF Buds ABF Buds ABF Buds ABF Buds ABF Buds ABF Buds TDZ ( M) % No. % No. % No. % No. % No. % No. 0 0a* 0 a 0 a 0 a 0 a 0 a 0 a 0 a 0 a 0 a 0 a 0 a 1 60b 2 b 45b 1.4b 35ab2.3b 70 b 2.5b 45ab 3.4b 65b 2.7b 10 80b 1.5 b 45b 1.3ab 65 b 1.7b 95 b 2.6b 75 b 2.9b 70b 2.9b 30 80b 1.6b 50b 1.8 b 55 b 2.2b 100b 2.8b 80 b 2.6b 95b 2.1b 60 80b 1.8b 50b 2.3 b 65 b 2.5b 100b 2.9b 70 b 2.1b 85b 2.4b Within columns, different letters indicate significant differences according to Tukeys HSD Multiple Range Test at p 0.05 Table A-4. Effect of different combinati ons of TDZ and IBA on regeneration index (Index), number of shoots per explant and shoot length in A. latifolia U18.8 after 60 days of culture. IBA ( M) 0 0.1 1 Index Shoots LengthIndex Shoots LengthIndex Shoots Length TDZ ( M) -No.-mm-No.-mm-No.-mm0 0a* 0a 0 a 0 a 0 a 0 a 0 a 0 a 0 a 1 1.7 b 11b 53 b 1.4 ab 7.5a 35 a 1.7 b 10 b 33 a 10 2.5 b 6 ab 40 ab 2.2 b 5 a 16 a 2 b 5.5ab 10 a 30 2.8 b 2 a 8.5 a 2.1 b 1.5a 3.5 a 2 b 0 a 0 a 60 2.9 b 0 a 0 a 1.5 ab 0 a 0 a 2.1 b 0 a 0 a Within columns, different letters indicate significant differences according to Tukeys HSD Multiple Range Test at p 0.05. Index= % shoot bud form ation x mean number of buds / 100

PAGE 92

79 Table A-5. Effect of different combina tions of TDZ and IBA on percentage of ex vitro acclimatization (%) in A. latifolia U18.6 and U18.8 after 20 days of transfer to ex vitro conditions. U 18.6 U 18.8 IBA ( M) IBA ( M) TDZ ( M) 0 0.1 1 0 0.1 1 0 0a* 0 a 0 a 0 a 0 a 0 a 1 86 b 49 ab 96 b 83 b 63 a 83 b 10 86 b 100 b 65 ab 25 ab 50 a 36 ab 30 13 ab 28 ab 50 ab 0 a 0 a 0 a 60 0 a 0 a 25 ab 0 a 0 a 0 a Within columns, different letters indicate significant differences according to Tukeys HSD Multiple Range Test at p 0.05 Table A-6. Effect of different combina tions of BAP and IBA on percentage of adventitious bud formation (ABF) and m ean number of buds per explant in A. latifolia U18.6 after 30 and 60 days of culture. 30 days of culture 60 days of culture IBA ( M) IBA ( M) 0 0.1 1 0 0.1 1 ABF Buds ABF Buds ABF BudsAB F Buds ABF Buds ABF Buds BAP ( M) % No. % No. % No. % No. % No. % No. 0 0a* 0 0 a 0 0 a 0 0 a 0 a 0 a 0 a 0 a 0 a 1 0 a 0 5 a 1 5 a 0.5 5 a 1.5ab10 a 4 b 10ab0.5 a 10 10 a 0.5 25 b 1 0 a 0 40 b 3.9 b 85 b 3.5 b 45 b 2.7 a 30 0 a 0 5 a 0.5 0 a 0 45 b 3.8 b 25 a 2 ab 40 b 2.9 a 60 0 a 0 0 a 0 0 a 0 10ab 3 ab 15 a 1.5ab 45 b 1.8 a Within columns, different letters indicate significant differences according to Tukeys HSD Multiple Range Test at p 0.05

PAGE 93

80 Table A-7. Effect of different combinati ons of BAP and IBA on regeneration index (Index) and shoot length in A. latifolia U18.6 after 60 days of culture. IBA ( M) 0 0.1 1 Index Length Index Length Index Length BAP ( M) --mm---mm---mm-0 0a* 0 0 a 0 0 a 0 1 0.2 ab 20 0.4 a 40 0.1 a 0 10 1.5 bc 30 3 b 42.5 1.4 a 30 30 1.6 c 20 0.5 a 5 1.2 a 50 60 0.3 ab 20 0.3 a 0 0.9 a 15 Within columns, different letters indicate significant differences according to Tukeys HSD Multiple Range Test at p 0.05. Index= % shoot bud form ation x mean number of buds / 100 Table A-8. Effect of different combina tions of BAP and IBA on percentage of adventitious bud formation (ABF) and m ean number of buds per explant in A. latifolia U18.8 after 30 and 60 days of culture. 30 days of culture 60 days of culture IBA ( M) IBA ( M) 0 0.1 1 0 0.1 1 ABF Buds ABF Buds ABF Buds ABF Buds ABF Buds ABF Buds BAP ( M) % No. % No. % No. % No. % No. % No. 0 0a* 0 0 a 0 0 a 0 0a 0 a 0 a 0 a 0 a 0 a 1 5 a 0.5 0 a 0 0 a 0 20 a 1 a 35ab 1.3 a 0 a 0 a 10 10 a 0.5 45b 1.3 20 a 1.2 60b 2.8 b 90 c 3.9 b 75b 2.5 b 30 5 a 0.5 0 a 0 0 a 0 80b 2.9 b 65bc 3.5 b 90b 2.3 b 60 5 a 0.5 0 a 0 0 a 0 75b 4.8 c 85bc 3.3 b 70b 3 b Within columns, different letters indicate significant differences according to Tukeys HSD Multiple Range Test at p 0.05

PAGE 94

81 Table A-9. Effect of different combinati ons of BAP and IBA on regeneration index (Index) and shoot length in A. latifolia U18.8 after 60 days of culture. IBA ( M) 0 0.1 1 Index Length Index Length Index Length BAP ( M) --mm---mm---mm-0 0 a* 0 0 a 0 0 a 0 1 0.4 ab 30 0.4 a 0 0 a 0 10 1.7 bc 40 3.5 b 58 1.9 b 50 30 2.4 cd 40 2.3 b 33 2.1 b 33 60 3.6d 30 2.8 b 20 2.1 b 20 Within columns, different letters indicate significant differences according to Tukeys HSD Multiple Range Test at p 0.05. Index= % shoot bud form ation x mean number of buds / 100 Table A-10. Effect of different times of exposure to TDZ on bud formation percentage (ABF), mean number of buds per ex plant and regeneration index (Index) in A. latifolia U18.6 after 30 and 60 days of culture, respectively. 30 days of culture 60 days of culture ABF Buds Index ABF Buds Index Days in TDZ --%---No.---%---No.-0 0a* 0 a 0 a 0 a 0 0 1 0 a 0 a 0 a 0 a 0 0 4 25 ab 1.7 b 0.4 ab 35 ab 2.8 0.9 7 80 bc 2.3 b 1.8 c 85 bc 2.3 1.9 14 75 bc 1.6 b 1.2 bc 75 bc 2.2 1.7 20 70 bc 2.9 b 2 c 85 bc 2.6 2.2 30 90 c 1.9 b 1.8 c 95 c 3 3 Within columns, different letters indicate significant differences according to Tukeys HSD Multiple Range Test at p 0.05. Index= % shoot bud form ation x mean number of buds / 100

PAGE 95

82 Table A-11. Effect of different times of exposure to TDZ on bud formation percentage (ABF), mean number of buds per ex plant and regeneration index (Index) in A. latifolia U18.8 after 30 and 60 days of culture, respectively. 30 days of culture 60 days of culture ABF Buds Index ABF Buds Index Days in TDZ --%---No.---%---No.-0 0a* 0 a 0 a 0 a 0 a 0 1 5 a 0.5 ab 0.1 ab 5 a 0.5 a 0.1 4 0 a 0 a 0 a 25 a 1.3 a 0.4 7 35 b 1.8 ab 0.6 abc 70 b 1.6 ab 1.2 14 65 b 1.8 ab 1.2 bc 80 b 2.9 b 2.3 20 75 b 2.2 b 1.7 c 90 b 2 ab 1.9 30 70 b 1.6 ab 1.1 abc 85 b 2.5 b 2.1 Within columns, different letters indicate significant differences according to Tukeys HSD Multiple Range Test at p 0.05. Index= % shoot bud form ation x mean number of buds / 100 Table A-12. Effect of short exposure to TDZ on bud formation percentage (ABF), mean number of buds per explant and regeneration index (Index) in A. latifolia U18.6 and U18.8 after 30 days of culture. U18.6 U18.8 ABF Buds Index ABF Buds Index Days in TDZ --%---No.---%---No.-0 0 0 0 0a* 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 a 0 0 2 5 0.5 0.1 0 a 0 0 3 10 1 0.2 0 a 0 0 4 5 0.5 0.1 5 ab 1.5 0.2 5 5 1 0.1 10 ab 0.5 0.1 6 20 1.2 0.3 5 ab 0.5 0.1 7 15 1 0.2 20 abc 1.2 0.3 8 25 1.9 0.5 15 ab 1 0.2 9 25 1.8 0.4 30 bc 1 0.3 10 25 0.7 0.4 45 c 1.1 0.5 Different letters indicate significant differences according to Tukeys HSD Multiple Range Test at p 0.05. Index= % shoot bud formation x mean number of buds / 100

PAGE 96

83 Table A-13. Effect of explant type on bud formation percentage (ABF), mean number of buds per explant and regeneration index (Index) in A. latifolia U18.6 and U18.8 after 30 days of culture. U18.6 U18.8 ABF Buds Index ABF Buds Index Types of explants --%---No.---%---No.-Petioles 10.3a* 1.5 ab 0.3 a 7.9 a 0.1 0 Rachis 90 d 3.5 bc 3.5 b 70 c 1 1 Immature leaves Leaflets 48.8bc 1.3 ab 0.8 a 27.5ab 1.1 0.4 Petioles 16 a 0.8 a 0.2 a 0 a 0 0 Rachis 80 cd 4.3 c 4.3 b 50 bc 1 1 Mature leaves Leaflets 37.5 ab 1.1 a 0.6 a 3.8 a 0.9 0.1 Within columns, different letters indicate significant differences according to Tukeys HSD Multiple Range Test at p 0.05. Index= % shoot bud form ation x mean number of buds / 100

PAGE 97

84 Figure A-1. Regression curve sowing the e ffect of exposure to TDZ on bud formation percentage (%) in A. latifolia after 30 days of initiation of cultures. Figure A-2. Regression curve sowing the effect of exposure to TDZ on mean number of buds per explant (No. Buds) in A. latifolia after 30 days of initiation of cultures. y = -0.1565x2 + 7.3789x 3.5616 R2 = 0.91 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 05101520253035 Days in TDZ % y = -0.0061x2 + 0.238x + 0.0791 R2 = 0.88 0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 05101520253035 Days in TDZNo. Buds

PAGE 98

85 Figure A-3. Regression curve sowing the e ffect of exposure to TDZ on regeneration index (Index) in A. latifolia after 30 days of initiation of cultures. y = -0.0037x2 + 0.1617x 0.1002 R2 = 0.90 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2 1.4 1.6 1.8 2 05101520253035 Days in TDZIndex

PAGE 99

86 LIST OF REFERENCES Agrawal V & Sardar PR (2006) In vitro propagation of Cassia angustifolia through leaflet and cotyledon derived calli. Biologia Plantarum 50 (1): 118-122 Akasaka Y, Daimon H & Masahiro M (2000) Improved plant regeneration from cultured leaf segments in peanut ( Arachis hypogaea L.) by limited exposure to thidiazuron. Plant Science 156: 169-175 Akashi R, Kawano T, Hashiguchi M, Kutsuna Y, Hoffmann-Tsay S & Hoffmann F (2003) Super roots in Lotus corniculatus : A unique tissue culture and regeneration system in a legume species. Plant and Soil 255: 27-33 Bajaj YPS, Labana KS & Dhanju MS (1980) Induction of pollen-embryos and pollencallus in anther cultures of Arachis hypogaea and A. glabrata Protoplasma 103: 397-399 Bajaj YPS, Ram AK, Labana KS & Singh H ( 1981) Regeneration of genetically variable plants from the anther-derived callus of Arachis hypogaea and Arachis villosa Plant Science Letters 23: 35-39 Baker CM & Wetzstein HY (1998) Leaflet de velopment, induction time, and medium influence somatic embryogenesis in peanut ( Arachis hypogaea L.). Plant Cell Reports 17: 925-929 Barik DP, Mohapatra U & Cha nd PK (2005) High frequency in vitro regeneration of Lathyrus sativus L. Biologia Plantarum 49 (4): 637-639 Bhojwani SS (1981) A tissue culture method fo r propagation and low temperature storage of Trifolium repens genotypes. Physiologia Plantarum 52: 187-190 Bovo OA, Mroginski LA & Rey HY (1986) Regene ration of plants from callus tissue of the pasture legume Lotononis bainesii Plant Cell Reports 5: 295-297 Caponetti JD, Gray DJ & Trigiano RN (2004) Hi story of plant tissue culture. In: Trigiano RN & Gray DJ (eds) Plant developmen t and biotechnology, (pp. 9-15). CRC Press, Boca Raton, Florida, USA Chakraborti D, Sarkar A & Das S (2006) Efficient and rapid in vitro plant regeneration system for Indian cultivars of chickpea ( Cicer arietinum L.). Plant Cell, Tissue and Organ Culture 86 (1): 117-123

PAGE 100

87 Cheng M, Hsi DCH & Phillips GC (1992) In vitro regeneration of Valencia-type peanut ( Arachis hypogaea L.) from cultured petiolules, epicotyl sections and other seedling explants. Peanut Science 19: 82-87 Chengalrayan K, Mhaske VB & Hazra S ( 1998) Genotypic control of peanut somatic embryogenesis. Plant Cell Reports 17: 522-525 Chengalrayan K, Hazra S & Gallo-Meagher M (2001) Histological analysis of somatic embryogenesis and organogenesis induced from mature zygotic embryo-derived leaflets of peanut ( Arachis hypogaea L.). Plant Science 161: 415-421 Clarke HJ, Wilson JG, Kuo I, Lulsdorf MM, Mallikarjuna N, Kuo J & Siddique KHM (2006) Embryo rescue and plant regeneration in vitro of selfed chickpea ( Cicer arietinum L.) and its wild annual relatives. Plant Cell, Tissue and Organ Culture 85: 197-204 Coelho LGM & Battistin A (1998) Meiotic behaviour of Adesmia DC. (LeguminosaeFaboideae) species native to Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil. Genet. Mol. Biol. 21 (3) Collins GB & Phillips GC (1982) In vitro tissue culture and plant regeneration in Trifolium pratense L. In: Earle ED & Demarly Y (eds), Regeneration from cells and tissue culture, (pp. 22-34). Praeger Scientific Publishing, New York Crews TE & Peoples MB (2004) Legume versus fertilizer sources of nitrogen: ecological tradeoffs and human needs. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment 102: 279-297 Delgado-Sanchez P, Saucedo-Ruiz M, Guzman-Maldonado SH, Villordo-Pineda E, Gonzalez-Chavira M & Fraire -Velazquez S, Acosta-Galle gos JA & Mora-Aviles A (2006) An organogenic plant regene ration system for common bean ( Phaseolus vulgaris L.). Plant Science 170: 822 Ding YL, Aldao-Humble G, Ludlow E, Drayt on M, Lin YH, Nagel J, Dupal M, Zhao G, Pallaghy C, Kalla R, Emmerling M & Sp angenberg G (2003) Efficient plant regeneration and Agrobacterium -mediated transformation in Medicago and Trifolium species. Plant Science 165: 1419-1427 Dita M.A, Rispail N, Prats E, Rubiales D & Singh KB (2006) Biotechnology approaches to overcome biotic and abiotic stress c onstraints in legumes. Euphytica 147: 1-24 Dodd MB & Orr SJ (1995) S easonal growth, phosphate response, and drought tolerance of 11 perennial legume species grown in a hill-country soil. New Zealand Journal of Agricultural Research 38: 7-20 Dunbar KB & Pittman RN (1992) Adventiti ous shoot formation from mature leaf explants of Arachis species. Crop Science 32: 1353-1356 Dunbar KB, Pinnow DL, Morris JB & Pittma n RN (1993a) Virus elimination from interspecific Arachis hybrids. Plant Di sease 77: 517-520

PAGE 101

88 Dunbar KB, Pittman RN & Morris JB (1993b) In vitro culture of embryonic axes from Arachis species for germplasm recovery. J ournal of Seed Technology 17(2): 1-8 Ezura H, Nukui N, Yuhashi KI & Minamisawa K (2000) In vitro plant regeneration in Macroptilium atropurpureum a legume with a broad symbiont range for nodulation. Plant Science 159: 21-27 Frame J (2004) Forage legumes for temp erate grasslands. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Scie nce Publishers, Inc. Enfield, USA. 309 pp Furuya H, Pfahler PL & Quesenberry KH (2001) Diploidautotetrap loid comparisons in red clover: seed weight and temperatur e effects on seedling growth. Agronomy Abstr. CD-ROM, c01-pfahler131856-0 Gagliardi RF, Pacheco GP, Valls JFM & Mansur E (2002) Cryopreservation of cultivated and wild Arachis species embryonic axes using dessication and vitrification methods. CryoLetters 23: 61-68 Gagliardi RF, Pacheco GP, Carneiro LA, Va lls JFM, Vieira MLC & Mansur E (2003) Cryopreservation of Arachis species by vitrification of in vitro -grown shoot apices and genetic stability of recove red plants. CryoLetters 24: 103-110 Gamborg OL, Miller RA & Ojima K (1968) Nutr ient requirements of suspension cultures of soybean root cells. Experi mental Cell Research 50:151-158 Gill R & Ozias-Akins P (1999) Thidiazuroninduced highly morphoge nic callus and high frequency regeneration of fertile peanut ( Arachis hypogaea L.) plants. In Vitro Cellular and Developmental BiologyPlant 35: 445-450 Graham PH & Vance CP (2003) Legumes: Im portance and constraints to greater use. Plant Physiology 131: 872-877 Griga M (1999) Somatic embryogenesis in grai n legumes. In: Strnad M, Pec P & Beck E (eds) Advances of Regula tion in Plant Growth and Development, (pp. 223-250). Peres Publ., Prague Grosser JW & Collins GB (1984) Isolation and culture of Trifolium rubens protoplasts with whole plant regeneration. Plant Science Letters 37: 165-170 Hazarika BN (2006) Morpho-physiological disorders in in vitro culture of plants. Scientia Horticulturae 108: 105-120 Heath LC, Chin SF, Spencer D & Higgins TJV (1993) In vitro regeneration of commercial cultivars of subterranean clove r. Plant Cell, Tissue and Organ Culture 35: 43-48

PAGE 102

89 Hou SW & Jia JF (2004) Plant regeneration fr om protoplasts isolat ed from embryogenic calli of the forage legume Astragalus melilotoides Pall. Plant Cell Reports 22: 741746 Huetteman CA & Preece JE (1993) Thidiazu ron: a potent cytokinin for woody plant tissue culture. Plant Cell Tissu e and Organ Culture 33: 105-119 Jaftha JB, Strijdom BW & Steyn PL (2002) Characterization of pigmented methylotrophic bacteria which nodulate Lotononis bainesii Systematic and Applied Microbiology 25: 440 Kane ME (2004) Shoot culture procedures. In: Trigiano RN & Gray DJ (eds), Plant development and biotechnology, (pp 145-157) CRC Press, Boca Raton, Florida, USA. Kanyand M, Porobo Dessai A & Prakash CS (1994) Thidiazuron promotes high frequency regeneration of peanut ( Arachis hypogaea ) plants in vitro Plant Cell Reports 14: 1-5 Kartha KK (1984) Tissue culture technique s for virus elimination and germplasm preservation. Plant Breeding Reviews 2: 265-282 Konieczny R (1995) Plant regene ration in callu s culture of Trifolium nigrescens Viv. Acta Biologica Cracoviensia 37: 47-52 Konieczny R (1999) Organogenesis during plant regeneration in cotyledon culture of Trifolium michelianum Savi. Acta Societatis Bo tanicorum Poloniae 68(3): 175-181 Konieczny R (2000) Histological studies on callus and shoot induction in culture of Trifolium nigrescensi Viv. in vitro. Acta Biologica Craco viensia 42 (1): 139-143. Lakshmanan P & Taji A (2000) Somatic embr yogenesis in leguminous plants. Plant Biology 2: 136-148 Lange O & Schifino-Wittmann MT (2000) Isoz yme variation in wild and cultivated species of the genus Trifolium L. (Leguminosae). Annals of Botany 86: 339-345 Li Z, Jarret RL, Pittman RN, Dunbar KB & Demski JW (1993) Efficient plant regeneration from protoplast of Arachis paraguariensis Chod. Et Hassl. using a nurse culture method. Plant Cell, Tissue and Organ Culture 34: 83-90 Lian MN, Murthy HN & Paek KY (2002) Effect s of light emitting diodes (LEDs) on the in vitro induction and growth of bulblets of Lilium oriental hybrid Pesaro. Scientia Hortic ulturae 94: 365-370 Loidl P (2004) A plant dialect of the histone language. Trends in Plant Science 9(2): 8490

PAGE 103

90 Loiseau J, Michaux-Ferriere N & Le Deunff Y (1998) Hist ology of somatic embryogenesis in pea. Plant Physiolo gy and Biochemistry 36 (9): 683-687 Lombari P, Ercolano E, El Alaoui H & Chiurazzi M (2003) A new transformationregeneration procedure in the model legume Lotus japonicus : root explants as a source of large numbers of cells susceptible to Agrobacterium -mediated transformation. Plant Cell Reports 21: 771-777 Luo JP, Jia JF, Gu YH & Liu J (1999) High frequency somatic embryogenesis and plant regeneration in callus cultures of Astragalus adsurgens Pall. Plant Science 143: 93 99 Maheswaran G & Williams EG (1984) Direct somatic embryoid formation on immature embryos of Trifolium repens T. pratense and Medicago sativa and rapid clonal propagation of T. repens Annals of Botany 54: 201-211 Mansur E, Lacorte C, Rabello ACG & Cordeiro AR (1993) In vitro regeneration of Arachis villosulicarpa Hoehne from cotyledon segments, leaves and cell suspension. Pesquisa Agropecuaria Brasileira 28 (10): 1143-1146 McGee JD, Wiliams EG, Collins GB & Hild ebrand DF (1989) Somatic embryognesis in Trifolium : protein profiles associated with highand low-frequency regeneration. Journal of Plant Physiology 135: 306-312 Microsoft (2003) Microsoft Excel. Release 11.0. Microsoft, Redmond, Washington, USA Morris JB, Dunn S & Pittman RN (1995) Pl ant recovery from embryonic axes of deteriorated peanut seed for germplas m renewal. Peanut Science 22: 66-70 Mroginski E, Rey HY, Gonzalez AM & Mrogi nski LA (2004a) Thidiazuron promotes in vitro plant regeneration of Arachis correntina (Leguminosae) via organogenesis. Journal Plant Growth Regulation 23: 129-134 Mroginski LA, Sansberro PA & Flachsland EA (2004b) Establecimiento de cultivos de tejidos vegetales. In: Echenique V, Rubinstein C & Morginski L (eds) Biotecnologa y mejoramiento vegetal, ( pp 35-42). INTA. Buenos Aires, Argentina Mundhara R & Rashid A (2006) Recalcitrant grain legume Vigna radiata mung bean, made to regenerate on change of horm onal and cultural conditions. Plant Cell, Tissue and Organ Culture 85(3): 265-270 Murashige T & Skoog F (1962) A revised medium for rapid growth and bioassays with tobacco tissue cultures. Phys iologia Plantarum 15: 473-497 Murthy BNS, Murch SJ & Saxena PK (1995) Thidiazuron-induced somatic embryogenesis in intact seedlings of peanut ( Arachis hypogaea ): Endogenous growth regulator levels a nd significance of cotyledons. Physiologia Plantarum 94: 268-276

PAGE 104

91 Myers JR, Grosser JW, Taylor NL & Co llins GB (1989) Genotype-dependent whole plant regeneration from pr otoplasts of red clover ( Trifolium pratense L.). Plant Cell Tissue and Organ Culture 19: 113-127 Oelck MM, Bapat VA & Schied er O (1982) Protoplast cu lture of three legumes: Arachis hypogaea Melilotus officinalis Trifolium resupinatum Z. Pflanzenphysiol. Bd. 106: 173-177 Olhoft PM, Flagel LE, Donovan CM & Somers DA (2003) Efficient soybean transformation using hygromycin B sele ction in the cotyledonary-node method. Plants 216 (5): 723-735 Olmos SE, Luciani G & Galdeano E (2004) Micropropagation. In: Echenique V, Rubinstein C & Morginski L (eds) Biotecnologa y mejoramiento vegetal, (pp 163172). INTA. Buenos Aires, Argentina Ozias-Akins P & Gill R (2001) Progress in the development of tissue culture and transformation methods applicable to the production of transgenic peanut. Peanut Science 28: 123-131 Peters M, Lascano CE, Roothaert R & de Haan NC (2003) Linking research on forage germplasm to farmers: the pathway to in creased adoptiona CIAT, ILRI and IITA perspective. Field Cr ops Research 84: 179-188 Phillips GC & Collins GB (1979) Virus symptom-free plants of red clover using meristem culture. Crop Science 19: 213-216 Phillips GC, Collins GB & Taylor NL (1982) Interspecific hybridization of red clover ( Trifolium pratense L.) with T. sarosiense Hazsl. using in vitro embryo rescue. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 62: 17-24 Pittman RN, Johnson BB & Banks DJ (1984) In vitro differenciation of a wild peanut, Arachis villosulicarpa Hoehne. Peanut Science 11: 24-27 Prasada Rao RDVJ, Pio-Ribeiro G, Pittm an R, Reddy DVR & Demski JW (1995) In vitro culture to eliminate peanut stripe virus from peanut seeds. Peanut Science 22: 5456 Pryzwara L, Pirog H, Konieczny R & Jach M (1 996) The use of tissu e culture methods in interspecific hybridizat ion within the genus Trifolium L. Acta Biologica Cracoviensia 38: 53-65 Quesenberry KH & Smith RR (1993) Recurrent se lection for plant regeneration from red clover tissue culture. Crop Science 33: 585-589 Quesenberry KH, Call NM, Moon DE & Dunn RA (1997) Response of native Eastern North American Trifolium spp. to root-knot nematodes. Crop Science 37: 270-274

PAGE 105

92 Quesenberry KH, Smith RL, Mullaney JM & Blount AR (2003) Development, identification and characterization of tetraploid bahiagrass. CSSA. C01quesenberry529179-poster Radhakrishnan T, Murthy TGK, Desai S & Bandyopahyay A (1999) Meristem culture of interspecific hybrids of groundnut. Biologia Plantarum 42 (2): 309-312 Radhakrishnan T, Murthy TGK, Chandran K & Bandyopahyay A (2000) Micropropagation in peanut ( Arachis hypogaea L.). Biologia Plantarum 43 (3): 447-450 Radice S (2004) Morfognesis in vitro In: Echenique V, Rubinstein C & Morginski L (eds) Biotecnologa y mejoramiento vege tal, (pp 27-33). INTA. Buenos Aires, Argentina Radionenko MA, Kuchuk NV, Khvedynich OA & Gleba YY (1994) Direct somatic embryogenesis and plant regeneration from protoplasts of red clover ( Trifolium pratense L.). Plant Science 97: 75-81 Real R, Dalla Rizza M, Quesenberry KH & Echenique M (2004) Reproductive and Molecular Evidence for Allogamy in Lotononis bainesii Baker. Crop Science 44: 394-400 Rey HY & Mroginski LA (1996) Regenerati on of plants from callus tissue of Aeschynomene spp (Leguminosae). Plant Cell, Ti ssue and Organ Culture 45: 185190 Rey HY & Mroginski LA (1997) Regenera tionof plants from callus tissue of Desmodium affine and Desmodium uncinatum Biologia Plantarum 39(2): 309-313 Rey HY & Mroginski LA (2006) Somatic em bryogenesis and plant regeneration in diploid and triploid Arachis pint oi. Biologia Plantarum 50 (1): 152-155 Rodrigues LR, Terra TF, Bered F & Bodanese -Zanettini MH (2004) Origin of embryolike structures in soybean anther culture investigated using SSR marker. Plant Cell Tissue and Organ Culture 77: 287-289 Rybcznski JJ (1997) Plant regeneration from highly embryogenic callus, cell suspension and protoplast cultures of T. fragiferum Plant Cell Tissue and Organ Culture 51: 159-170 Saini R & Jaiwal PK (2002) Age, position in mo ther seedling, orientation, and polarity of the epicotyl segments of blackgram ( Vigna mungo L. Hepper) determines its morphogenic response. Plant Science 163: 101-109 Singh AK & Chand S (2003) Somatic embryoge nesis and plant regeneration from cotyledon explants of a timbe r-yielding leguminous tree, Dalbergia sissoo Roxb. Journal of Plant Physiology 160: 415-421

PAGE 106

93 Singh ND, Sahoo L, Sarin NB & Jaiwal PK (2003) The effect of TDZ on organogenesis and somatic embryogenesis in pigeonpea ( Cajanus cajan L. Millsp). Plant Science 164: 341-347 Speroni G & Izaguirre P (2003) Caracteris ticas biologicas de la leguminosa native promisoria forrajera Trifolium polymorphum Poir. (Fabaceae, Faboideae). Agrociencia 7 (1): 68-76 Statisical Analysis Institute (2004) SAS/ STAT User's Guide Release. Release 9.0. Statisical Analysis Institute, Cary, NC Taylor NL, Anderson MK, Quesenberry KH & Watson L (1976) Doubling the chromosome number of Trifolium species using nitrous oxide. Crop. Sci. 16: 516518 Tedesco SB, DallAgnol M, Schifino-Witt mann MT & Valls JFM (2000) Mode of reproduction of Brazilian species of Adesmia (Leguminosae). Genetics and Molecular Biology 23(2): 475-478 Tedesco SB, Stefanello MO, Schifino-Witt mann MT, Battistin A & DallAgnol M (2001) Superacao de dormencia em sementes de especies de Adesmia DC (Leguminosae). Rev. Bras de Agrociencia 7(2): 89-92 Tilman D, Cassman KG, Matson PA, Naylor R & Polasky S (2002) Agricultural sustainability and intensive produc tion practices. Nature 418: 671-677 Tomlin ES, Branch SR, Chamberlain D, Gabe H, Wright MS & Stewart Jr. CN (2002) Screening of soybean, Glycine max (L.) Merrill, lines for somatic embryo induction and maturation capability from immatu re cotyledons. In Vitro Cellular and Developmental BiologyPlant 38: 543-548 Ulibarri EA & Burkart A (2000) Sinopsis de las especies de Adesmia (Leguminosae, Adesmiae) de la Argentina. Darviniana 38 (1-2): 59-126 Veltcheva M, Svetleva D, Petkova S & Perl A (2005) In vitro regeneration and genetic transformation of common bean ( Phaseolus vulgaris L.)Problems and progress. Scientia Horticulturae 107: 2-10 Vidoz ML, Klusacek P, Rey HY & Mroginski LA (2006) In vitro plant regeneration of Arachis correntina (Leguminosae) through so matic embryogenesis and organogenesis. Plant Cell, Tissue and Organ Culture 86 (1): 111-115 Webb KJ, Woodcock S & Chamberlain DA (1987) Plant regeneration from protoplasts of Trifolium repens and Lotus corniculatus Plant Breeding 98: 111-118 Yamada T, Sakai A, Matsumura T & Higuc hi S (1991) Cryopreservation of apical meristems of white clover ( Trifolium repens L.). Plant Science 73: 111-116

PAGE 107

94 Zohary M & Heller D (1984) The genus Trifolium Israel Academy of Sciences and Humanities, Jerusalem. 606 pp

PAGE 108

95 BIOGRAPHICAL SKETCH Maria Laura Vidoz was born in Reconquista, Santa Fe, Argentina, on 3 November, 1975. At the age of two, her family moved to Corrientes, Argentina. She attended the Colegio San Jose from 1980 to 1993. In 1994 sh e began her undergraduate studies at the Facultad de Ciencias Agrarias, Universidad Nacional del Nordeste. In 2002, she received her Agronomy Engineer degree. She worked from 1995 to 1997 at the Instituto de Botanica del Nordeste and then from 1997 to 2004 at the Vegetal Tissue Culture Laboratory, at the same univers ity. She began her graduate ca reer at the University of Florida in January 2005, under the direction of Dr. Kenneth Quesenberry. In December 2006 she was awarded a Master of Science de gree in Agronomy with an emphasis in plant breeding and genetics. After graduati on, Laura plans to pursue her Ph.D. before returning to Argentina to work in the field plant physiology.


Permanent Link: http://ufdc.ufl.edu/UFE0017881/00001

Material Information

Title: Tissue culture of Trifolium polymorphum, T. carolinianum, Adesmia latifolia, A. bicolor and Lotononis bainesii
Physical Description: Mixed Material
Language: English
Creator: Vidoz, Maria Laura ( Dissertant )
Quesenberry, Kenneth H. ( Thesis advisor )
Williams, Mary J. ( Thesis advisor )
Gallo, Maria ( Reviewer )
Wofford, David ( Reviewer )
Publisher: University of Florida
Place of Publication: Gainesville, Fla.
Publication Date: 2006
Copyright Date: 2006

Subjects

Subjects / Keywords: Agronomy thesis, M.S
Dissertations, Academic -- UF -- Agronomy

Notes

Abstract: Although they fix nitrogen, provide feed for livestock, improve soil properties and protect the soil from erosion, many forage legume species have been underutilized. Currently, breeding programs have an increased interest in several of the less-studied species that could improve pasture quality in subtropical regions of the world. Trifolium polymorphum Poir., T. carolinianum Michx., Adesmia latifolia (Spreng.) Vogel, A. bicolor (Poir.) DC. and Lotononis bainesii Baker are promising forages; however, they possess two major drawbacks: low seedling vigor and low dry matter production. The objective of this research was to develop in vitro plant regeneration protocols for these species that could assist breeding programs by potentially enabling the use of in vitro chromosome doubling techniques and genetic transformation. Experiments using three types of basal medium (MS, L2 and B5) were conducted with T. polymorphum and Adesmia spp. In the latter, the effect of different plant growth regulators (TDZ, BAP and IBA) alone or in combination was evaluated. Cotyledon culture on media supplemented with various plant growth regulators was assessed in T. carolinianum, Adesmia spp. and L. bainesii. Time required for shoot bud induction in A. latifolia was determined using immature leaflets as explants. Different leaf parts were evaluated for their morphogenetic potential in A. latifolia and L. bainesii. In T. polymorphum, only callus formation was achieved using primarily B5 basal medium. With T. carolinianum, cotyledon culture on MS + 10 micron TDZ for 30 days with transfer to MS + 1 micron TDZ gave superior shoot bud organogenesis (20% of genotypes). Plant regeneration of A. bicolor was achieved through immature leaflet culture on MS or L2 + 4.5 micron TDZ for 60 days followed by transfer to MS devoid of plant growth regulators for 45 days. The highest frequency of plant regeneration in A. latifolia was obtained using immature rachises cultured on MS + 10 micron TDZ for 20 days and then transferred to MS without plant growth regulators for bud elongation and rooting. L. bainesii plant regeneration (in 90% of genotypes) was achieved by culturing immature leaflets on MS + 4.5 micron TDZ for 30 days and then transferring cultures to MS + 0.044 micron BAP + 0.049 micron IBA for bud elongation and rooting. In conclusion, shoot organogenesis protocols were developed for four out of the five forage legume species evaluated, and plant regeneration was achieved with three of these species. Additional experiments to obtain rooting of T. carolinianum should be conducted. Studies to reduce the incidence of hyperhydricity in cultures of Adesmia spp. and to assess the influence of different plant growth regulators on shoot bud formation of L. bainesii are also needed.
Subject: Adesmia, culture, legumes, Lotononis, organogenesis, plant, regeneration, tissue, Trifolium
General Note: Title from title page of source document.
General Note: Document formatted into pages; contains 108 pages.
General Note: Includes vita.
Thesis: Thesis (M.S.)--University of Florida, 2006.
Bibliography: Includes bibliographical references.
General Note: Text (Electronic thesis) in PDF format.

Record Information

Source Institution: University of Florida
Holding Location: University of Florida
Rights Management: All rights reserved by the source institution and holding location.
System ID: UFE0017881:00001

Permanent Link: http://ufdc.ufl.edu/UFE0017881/00001

Material Information

Title: Tissue culture of Trifolium polymorphum, T. carolinianum, Adesmia latifolia, A. bicolor and Lotononis bainesii
Physical Description: Mixed Material
Language: English
Creator: Vidoz, Maria Laura ( Dissertant )
Quesenberry, Kenneth H. ( Thesis advisor )
Williams, Mary J. ( Thesis advisor )
Gallo, Maria ( Reviewer )
Wofford, David ( Reviewer )
Publisher: University of Florida
Place of Publication: Gainesville, Fla.
Publication Date: 2006
Copyright Date: 2006

Subjects

Subjects / Keywords: Agronomy thesis, M.S
Dissertations, Academic -- UF -- Agronomy

Notes

Abstract: Although they fix nitrogen, provide feed for livestock, improve soil properties and protect the soil from erosion, many forage legume species have been underutilized. Currently, breeding programs have an increased interest in several of the less-studied species that could improve pasture quality in subtropical regions of the world. Trifolium polymorphum Poir., T. carolinianum Michx., Adesmia latifolia (Spreng.) Vogel, A. bicolor (Poir.) DC. and Lotononis bainesii Baker are promising forages; however, they possess two major drawbacks: low seedling vigor and low dry matter production. The objective of this research was to develop in vitro plant regeneration protocols for these species that could assist breeding programs by potentially enabling the use of in vitro chromosome doubling techniques and genetic transformation. Experiments using three types of basal medium (MS, L2 and B5) were conducted with T. polymorphum and Adesmia spp. In the latter, the effect of different plant growth regulators (TDZ, BAP and IBA) alone or in combination was evaluated. Cotyledon culture on media supplemented with various plant growth regulators was assessed in T. carolinianum, Adesmia spp. and L. bainesii. Time required for shoot bud induction in A. latifolia was determined using immature leaflets as explants. Different leaf parts were evaluated for their morphogenetic potential in A. latifolia and L. bainesii. In T. polymorphum, only callus formation was achieved using primarily B5 basal medium. With T. carolinianum, cotyledon culture on MS + 10 micron TDZ for 30 days with transfer to MS + 1 micron TDZ gave superior shoot bud organogenesis (20% of genotypes). Plant regeneration of A. bicolor was achieved through immature leaflet culture on MS or L2 + 4.5 micron TDZ for 60 days followed by transfer to MS devoid of plant growth regulators for 45 days. The highest frequency of plant regeneration in A. latifolia was obtained using immature rachises cultured on MS + 10 micron TDZ for 20 days and then transferred to MS without plant growth regulators for bud elongation and rooting. L. bainesii plant regeneration (in 90% of genotypes) was achieved by culturing immature leaflets on MS + 4.5 micron TDZ for 30 days and then transferring cultures to MS + 0.044 micron BAP + 0.049 micron IBA for bud elongation and rooting. In conclusion, shoot organogenesis protocols were developed for four out of the five forage legume species evaluated, and plant regeneration was achieved with three of these species. Additional experiments to obtain rooting of T. carolinianum should be conducted. Studies to reduce the incidence of hyperhydricity in cultures of Adesmia spp. and to assess the influence of different plant growth regulators on shoot bud formation of L. bainesii are also needed.
Subject: Adesmia, culture, legumes, Lotononis, organogenesis, plant, regeneration, tissue, Trifolium
General Note: Title from title page of source document.
General Note: Document formatted into pages; contains 108 pages.
General Note: Includes vita.
Thesis: Thesis (M.S.)--University of Florida, 2006.
Bibliography: Includes bibliographical references.
General Note: Text (Electronic thesis) in PDF format.

Record Information

Source Institution: University of Florida
Holding Location: University of Florida
Rights Management: All rights reserved by the source institution and holding location.
System ID: UFE0017881:00001


This item has the following downloads:


Full Text












TISSUE CULTURE OF Trifolium polymorphum, T. carolinianum, Adesmia latifolia, A.
bicolor AND Lotononis bainesii















By

MARIA LAURA VIDOZ


A THESIS PRESENTED TO THE GRADUATE SCHOOL
OF THE UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT
OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF
MASTER OF SCIENCE

UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA


2006

































Copyright 2006

by

Maria Laura Vidoz



































To my mother and to God, for their unconditional love.
















ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

I would like to thank God for revealing His presence throughout my life, for His

guidance during hard times and for His many blessings. I am thankful to my mother for

her unconditional support and encouragement, for devoting so much time to my

education, for giving me a deep love of nature, making it difficult to put into words how

much she means to me.

I would like to thank my supervisory committee chair (Dr. Kenneth Quesenberry)

for his advice and knowledge, and for introducing me to his wonderful family, all of

which helped me professionally and personally. I am also grateful to the other members

of my committee (Dr. Mimi Williams, Dr. Maria Gallo and Dr. David Wofford) for their

critics and suggestions.

I thank Judy Dampier for her technical support, friendship and advice, making my

stay in Gainesville a positive experience. I thank Loan Ngo for her technical assistance

and sincere friendship. I also appreciate the technical support of Lindsay and Kailey

Place.

I am thankful to Luis Mroginski and Dr. Hebe Rey, who introduced me to the tissue

culture world and constantly encouraged me to grow in my career.

I would like to thank Lorena, Carlos, Gaby, Raquel, Jorge and Sonali for their

company during these two years, and to all my friends in Argentina for their support.




















TABLE OF CONTENTS


page

ACKNOWLEDGMENT S .............. .................... iv


LIST OF TABLES ................. ..............vii.._. ......


LIST OF FIGURES .............. ...............x.....


AB STRAC T ................ .............. xii


CHAPTER


1 INTRODUCTION ................. ...............1.......... ......


2 LITERATURE REVIEW ................. ...............5................


Tissue Culture Concepts as Applied to the Fabaceae Family............... ................5
Applications of Tissue Culture for the Fabaceae Family .............. .....................
Production of Plants Free from Certain Specific Pathogens .............. ..... ...........10
Micropropagation ......___ .......___ ... ..._ .............1
Production of Dihaploid, Homozygous Plants .............. ......... .... ................12
Generation oflInterspecific Hybrids: Embryo Rescue and Protoplast Fusion.....12
Plant Regeneration after Transformation Protocols ............... ...... ..................1
Medium and Long-term Germplasm Conservation and Plant Material
Exchange ................. ...............15.................

3 MATERIALS AND METHODS .............. ...............17....


Plant M material ................. ...............17........ ......
Culture Conditions................ ... ............1
Evaluation and Experimental Design .............. ...............19....


4 TISSUE CULTURE OF Trifolium polymorphum AND T. carolinianum ...............21

Introducti on ................. ...............21._ ___.......
Materials and methods ............ ............ ...............22...
Trifolium polymorphum .....__ ................. ........__ .......... 2
Trifolium carolinianum .............. ...............23....
Results and Discussion .............. ...............23....
Trifolium polymorphum .....__ ................. ........__ .......... 2












Trifolium carolinianum .............. ...............25....
Conclusions............... ..............2


5 PLANT REGENERATION OF Adesmia latifolia AND A. bicolor ........._..._.............3 1


Introducti on ........._..._. ...._ ... ...............3_ 1....
Materials and Methods .............. ...............32....
Plant M material .............. ...............32...
Basal Media Experiment .............. ........... ..............3
Factorial Experiments with TDZ and BAP .............. ...............34....
Induction Time Experiments .............. ...............35....
Type of Explant Experiment ........._..__......_ .. ...............35..
Results and Discussion .................. ... ... ..............3
Effect of Basal Medium on Shoot Organogenesis .................... ...............3
Influence of TDZ on Organogenesis .............. ...............38....
Influence of BAP on Organogenesis ................. ...............40........... ...
Induction Time for Adventitious Bud Formation................ ..............4
Effect of Explant Type on Shoot Organogenesis ................. .......................44
Conclusions............... ..............4


6 PLANT REGENERATION OF Lotononis bainesii ........._. ....._.... ..............61


Introducti on ............. ..... .._ ...............61....
Materials and Methods .............. ...............62....

Cotyledon Culture .............. ...............62....
Leaflet Culture ....__. ................. .......__. ..........6

Type of Explants ....__. ................. ...............63. ....
Results and Discussion .............. ...............63....

Cotyledon Culture .............. ...............63....
Leaflet Culture ....__. ................. .......__. ..........6

Type of Explant ................. ...............67...............
Conclusions............... ..............6


7 SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS ................._.._.._ ......... ............7


APPENDIX


ADDITIONAL TABLES FOR TWO GENOTYPES OF Adesmia latifolia ........._.._........77


LIST OF REFERENCES ........._..... ...._... ...............86....


BIOGRAPHICAL SKETCH .............. ...............95....

















LIST OF TABLES


Table pg

3-1 Plant material used as a source of explants in the experiments. ............. ................20

4-1 Mean percentage of explants producing callus from petiole pieces of T.
polymorphum in three basal media after 30 days of culture. ............. ..................29

4-2 Number of buds per explant in the responsive genotypes of 7 carolinianum
cultured on medium supplemented with 10 CIM TDZ after 30 and 60 days of
culture. ........... ..... .. ...............29....

5-1 Effect of three basal media on percentage of adventitious bud formation, mean
number of buds and regeneration index in A. bicolor and A. latifolia after 60
days of culture. ............. ...............47.....

5-2 Effect of TDZ concentration on percentage of adventitious bud formation, mean
number of buds per explant, and regeneration index in A. latifolia after 30 days
of culture. ............. ...............48.....

5-3 Effect of TDZ concentration on percentage of adventitious bud formation, mean
number of buds per explant, regeneration index, number of shoots, shoot length
and percentage of ex vitro survival in A. latifolia. ........._.._. .....___ ........._.....48

5-4 Effect of BAP concentration on percentage of adventitious bud formation, mean
number of buds per explant and regeneration index in A. latifolia after 30 days
of culture. ............. ...............49.....

5-5 Effect of BAP concentration on percentage of adventitious bud formation, mean
number of buds per explant and regeneration index after 60 days of culture; and
shoot length after 90 days of culture in A. latifolia. ................ ...................4

5-6 Effect of different times of exposure to TDZ on bud formation percentage, mean
number of buds per explant and regeneration index in A. latifolia after 30 and 60
days of culture. ............. ...............50.....

5-7 Effect of short exposure to TDZ on bud formation percentage, mean number of
buds per explant and regeneration index in A. latifolia after 30 days of culture.....50

5-8 Effect of explant type on bud formation percentage, mean number of buds per
explant and regeneration index in A. latifolia after 30 days of culture. ..................5 1










6-1 ANOVA table showing the p-values corresponding to the effect of explant type
on bud formation percentage, mean number of buds per explant and regeneration
index in L. bainesii after 30 days of culture. .............. ...............70....

6-2 Effect of explant type on bud formation percentage, mean number of buds per
explant and regeneration index in L. bainesii after 30 days of culture. ..................70

A-1 Effect of different combinations of TDZ and IBA on percentage of adventitious
bud formation and mean number of buds per explant in A. latifolia Ul8.6 after
3 0 and 60 day s of cul ture. ............. ...............77.....

A-2 Effect of different combinations of TDZ and IBA on regeneration index, number
of shoots per explant and shoot length in A. latifolia Ul8.6 after 60 days of
culture. ...._.._................. ........_.._.........77

A-3 Effect of different combinations of TDZ and IBA on percentage of adventitious
bud formation and mean number of buds per explant in A. latifolia Ul8.8 after
30 and 60 days of culture. ............. ...............78.....

A-4 Effect of different combinations of TDZ and IBA on regeneration index, number
of shoots per explant and shoot length in A. latifolia Ul8.8 after 60 days of
culture. ...._.._................. ........_.._.........78

A-5 Effect of different combinations of TDZ and IBA on percentage of ex vitro
acclimatization in A. latifolia Ul8.6 and Ul8.8 after 20 days of transfer to ex
vitro conditions. ........._.._.. ...._... ...............79....

A-6 Effect of different combinations of BAP and IBA on percentage of adventitious
bud formation and mean number of buds per explant in A. latifolia Ul8.6 after
30 and 60 days of culture. ............. ...............79.....

A-7 Effect of different combinations of BAP and IBA on regeneration index and
shoot length in A. latifolia Ul8.6 after 60 days of culture. .................. ...............80

A-8 Effect of different combinations of BAP and IBA on percentage of adventitious
bud formation and mean number of buds per explant in A. latifolia Ul8.8 after
30 and 60 days of culture. ............. ...............80.....

A-9 Effect of different combinations of BAP and IBA on regeneration index and
shoot length in A. latifolia Ul8.8 after 60 days of culture. .................. ...............81

A-10 Effect of different times of exposure to TDZ on bud formation percentage, mean
number of buds per explant and regeneration index in A. latifolia Ul8.6 after 30
and 60 days of culture. ............. ...............81.....

A-11 Effect of different times of exposure to TDZ on bud formation percentage, mean
number of buds per explant and regeneration index in A. latifolia Ul8.8 after 30
and 60 days of culture. ............. ...............82.....










A-12 Effect of short exposure to TDZ on bud formation percentage, mean number of
buds per explant and regeneration index in A. latifolia Ul8.6 and Ul8.8 after 30
days of culture. ............. ...............82.....

A-13 Effect of explant type on bud formation percentage, mean number of buds per
explant and regeneration index in A. latifolia Ul8.6 and Ul8.8 after 30 days of
culture. ........... ..... .. ._ ...............83.....

















LIST OF FIGURES


Figure pg

4-1 Shoot bud organogenesis through cotyledon culture of 7 carolinianum ................30

5-1 Organogenesis in A. latifolia ............... ...............52....

5-2 Regression curve showing the effect of TDZ concentration on percentage of
adventitious bud formation in A. latifolia after 60 days of culture. .........................53

5-3 Regression curve showing the effect of TDZ concentration on regeneration
index in A. latifolia after 30 days of culture. ........._.._.. ...._.. ........_.._......5

5-4 Regression curve showing the effect of TDZ concentration on shoot number per
explant in A. latifolia after 90 days of culture. .............. ...............54....

5-5 Regression curve showing the effect of TDZ concentration on shoot length in A.
latifolia after 90 days of culture. ............. ...............54.....

5-6 Regression curve showing the effect of TDZ concentration on acclimatization
rate in A. latifolia after 30 days of transfer to ex vitro conditions. ........................55

5-7 Regression curve showing the effect of BAP concentration on percentage of
adventitious bud formation in A. latifolia after 30 days of culture. .........................55

5-8 Regression curve showing the effect of BAP concentration on regeneration
index in A. latifolia after 30 days of culture. ........._.._.. ...._.. ........_.._......5

5-9 Regression curve showing the effect of BAP concentration on percentage of
adventitious bud formation in A. latifolia after 60 days of culture. .........................56

5-10 Regression curve showing the effect of BAP concentration on mean number of
buds per explant in A. latifolia after 60 days of culture. ................... ...............5

5-11 Regression curve showing the effect of BAP concentration on regeneration
index in A. latifolia after 60 days of culture. ........._.._.. ...._.. ........_.._......5

5-12 Regression curve showing the effect of BAP concentration on shoot length in A.
latifolia after 90 days of culture. ............. ...............58.....

5-13 Regression curve sowing the effect of exposure to TDZ on bud formation
percentage in A. latifolia after 60 days of initiation of cultures. .............. ..............58










5-14 Regression curve sowing the effect of exposure to TDZ on mean number of
buds per explant in A. latifolia after 60 days of initiation of cultures. ..................59

5-15 Regression curve sowing the effect of exposure to TDZ on regeneration index in
A. latifolia after 60 days of initiation of cultures. ........._. ......__ ................59

5-16 Regression curve sowing the effect of short exposures to TDZ on percentage of
bud formation in A. latifolia after 30 days of initiation of cultures.............._.._.. ......60

5-17 Regression curve sowing the effect of short exposures to TDZ on regeneration
index in A. latifolia after 30 days of initiation of cultures. ................ ........_.._.....60

6-1 Organogenesi s in L. bainesii ................. ......... ...............71. ..

6-2 Number of buds produced per explant by 50 genotypes of L. bainesii after 30
days of culture from cotyledon and leaflets. ............. ...............72.....

6-3 Number of plants produced per explant after 90 days of culture by responsive
genotypes ofL. bainesii through cotyledon and leaflet culture. ............. ................72

6-4 Number of successfully acclimatized plants in the genotypes of L. bainesii that
were capable of plant regeneration through cotyledon and leaflet culture.. .............73

A-1 Regression curve sowing the effect of exposure to TDZ on bud formation
percentage in A. latifolia after 30 days of initiation of cultures..........._.._.. ............_.84

A-2 Regression curve sowing the effect of exposure to TDZ on mean number of
buds per explant in A. latifolia after 30 days of initiation of cultures. ................... ..84

A-3 Regression curve sowing the effect of exposure to TDZ on regeneration index in
A. latifolia after 30 days of initiation of cultures. .....___.............. ... ........._..._85
















Abstract of Thesis Presented to the Graduate School
of the University of Florida in Partial Fulfillment of the
Requirements for the Degree of Master of Science

TISSUE CULTURE OF Trifolium polymorphum, T. carolinianum, Adesmia latifolia, A.
bicolor AND Lotononis bainesii
By

Maria Laura Vidoz

December 2006

Chair: Kenneth H. Quesenberry
Cochair: Mary J. Williams
Major Department: Agronomy

Although they fix nitrogen, provide feed for livestock, improve soil properties and

protect the soil from erosion, many forage legume species have been underutilized.

Currently, breeding programs have an increased interest in several of the less-studied

species that could improve pasture quality in subtropical regions of the world. Trifolium

polymorphum Poir., T. carolinianum Michx., Adesmia latifolia (Spreng.) Vogel, A.

bicolor (Poir.) DC. and Lotononis bainesii Baker are promising forages; however, they

possess two maj or drawbacks: low seedling vigor and low dry matter production. The

obj ective of this research was to develop in vitro plant regeneration protocols for these

species that could assist breeding programs by potentially enabling the use of in vitro

chromosome doubling techniques and genetic transformation.

Experiments using three types of basal medium (MS, L2 and B5) were conducted

with 7: polymorphum and Adesmia spp. In the latter, the effect of different plant growth

regulators (TDZ, BAP and IBA) alone or in combination was evaluated. Cotyledon









culture on media supplemented with various plant growth regulators was assessed in T.

carolinianum, Adesmia spp. and L. bainesii. Time required for shoot bud induction in A.

latifolia was determined using immature leaflets as explants. Different leaf parts were

evaluated for their morphogenetic potential in A. latifolia and L. bainesii.

In T. polymorphum, only callus formation was achieved using primarily B5 basal

medium. With 7: carolinianum, cotyledon culture on MS + 10 CIM TDZ for 30 days with

transfer to MS + 1 C1M TDZ gave superior shoot bud organogenesis (20% of genotypes).

Plant regeneration ofA. bicolor was achieved through immature leaflet culture on MS or

L2 + 4.5 CIM TDZ for 60 days followed by transfer to MS devoid of plant growth

regulators for 45 days. The highest frequency of plant regeneration in A. latifolia was

obtained using immature rachises cultured on MS + 10 CIM TDZ for 20 days and then

transferred to MS without plant growth regulators for bud elongation and rooting. L.

bainesii plant regeneration (in 90% of genotypes) was achieved by culturing immature

leaflets on MS + 4.5 CIM TDZ for 30 days and then transferring cultures to MS + 0.044

CIM BAP + 0.049 CIM IBA for bud elongation and rooting.

In conclusion, shoot organogenesis protocols were developed for four out of the

five forage legume species evaluated, and plant regeneration was achieved with three of

these species. Additional experiments to obtain rooting of T. carolinianum should be

conducted. Studies to reduce the incidence of hyperhydricity in cultures of Adesmia spp.

and to assess the influence of different plant growth regulators on shoot bud formation of

L. bainesii are also needed.















CHAPTER 1
INTTRODUCTION

In addition to providing feed for livestock, forages offer multiple benefits such as

maintenance and improvement of soil characteristics, weed suppression, and protection of

soil from erosion. When used as cover crops, forages may also assist in the recovery of

degraded soils (Peters et al., 2003) by decreasing the loss of nutrients from leaching or

erosion (Tilman et al., 2002). Forages that exhibit two or more of these characteristics are

better accepted by farmers in agricultural systems (Peters et al., 2003).

The family Fabaceae comprises between 670 to 750 genera and 18,000 to 19,000

species, many of which constitute an important source of protein in human and animal

diets, balancing the amino acids provided by cereals (Graham & Vance, 2003).

According to Crews & Peoples (2004), legumes constitute a more environmentally

friendly source of nitrogen than synthetic fertilizers due to their ability to fix nitrogen,

reducing the risk of eutrophication and contamination of subterranean water.

However, numerous species of pasture legumes have thus far been underutilized

(Graham & Vance, 2003), although many of them could be used to increase the genetic

variability of their cultivated relatives or as a source of useful genes. For instance,

legumes bred for drought and salinity tolerance would be useful in water-stressed areas of

the world (Graham & Vance, 2003). In this scenario, forages that are naturally adapted to

those conditions will be particularly valuable.

With approximately 240 species, the genus Trifolium L. is one of the most

important genera in the Fabaceae family regarding the number of species it comprises









and their potential uses (Zohary & Heller, 1984). It is found in temperate to subtropical

regions of Europe, the Americas, Asia and Africa (Lange & Schifino-Wittmann, 2000),

but also occurs in the mountain and alpine zones in the tropics of West Africa and South

America (Zohary & Heller, 1984). At least 25 species are useful as forages.

Trifolium polymorphum is endemic to subtropical South America and 7

carolmianum is endemic to subtropical North America. Although common in native

grasslands, neither species has been the subject of crop improvement research through

plant breeding programs. T. polymorphum Poir. is a perennial subtropical species

described in the United States, Argentina, Brazil, Chile, Paraguay, Peru and Uruguay

(Quesenberry et al., 1997). It constitutes the only amphicarpic species in the genus and

has been used in some cytogenetic and reproductive studies (Lange & Schifino-

Wittmann, 2000). Agronomic evaluations conducted in New Zealand discovered one

accession with 154 g kg-l crude protein and 697 g kg-l digestibility (Dodd & Orr, 1995).

However, its marginal dry matter (DM) production and low seedling vigor is a maj or

limitation for its use as a forage legume.

Trifolium carolinianum Michx. is an annual species native to the southeastern US.

It produces seed and nodulates profusely, but like T. polymorphum, it has low seedling

vigor and low DM production. Genetic improvement through traditional breeding and

transformation can overcome these restrictions. Transformation, however, usually

requires an efficient protocol for plant regeneration to be in place. Although in vitro

regeneration protocols are available for several Trifolium species (Ding et al., 2003),

there are none for 7 polymorphum or T. carolinianum. Additionally, induction of

polyploidy can also be used to increase seedling vigor and overall plant size, as was









shown previously in the genus Trifolium (Taylor et al., 1976; Furuya et al., 2001). Once

again, the availability of an in vitro protocol would permit the use of additional

techniques to duplicate chromosomes in T. polymorphum as has been demonstrated in

bahiagrass (Paspalum notatum Fliigge) using colchicine, trifluralin and oryzalin

(Quesenberry et al., 2003). Moreover, the use of an in vitro protocol to induce

chromosome duplication could prevent the recovery of chimeric plants that often are

obtained when vegetative meristems are treated with chromosome doubling agents. In an

in vitro system single cells are doubled and, consequently, plant regeneration from these

single cells, as in the case of adventitious bud formation, renders a plant whose cells

uniformly contain duplicated chromosomes.

Adesmia DC. (Fabaceae) is the only genus of the South American tribe Adesmieae

(Benth.) Hutch and it comprises approximately 240 species of herbs and shrubs (Ulibarri

& Burkart, 2000). Many Adesmia species, such as A. bicolor (Poir.) DC., A. latifolia

(Spreng.) Vogel and A. punctat (Poir.) DC., constitute promising forage materials

because of their satisfactory winter growth, high crude protein values and good in vitro

organic matter digestibility. These species have been reported to be useful for soil cover

and erosion control (Coelho & Battistin, 1998; Tedesco et al., 2000; Tedesco et al.,

2001). In addition, A. bicolor showed tolerance to low phosphorous fertility and

possesses valuable morphological characteristics when compared to other legumes (Dodd

& Orr, 1995). In spite of these desirable characteristics, there are very few reports related

to the biology of the genus (Coelho & Battistin, 1998; Dodd & Orr, 1995; Tedesco et al.,

2000; Tedesco et al., 2001), and no reports regarding their use in tissue culture.










The genus Lotononis belongs to the tribe Crotalarieae and comprises approximately

150 species, from herbs to small shrubs (Jaftha et al., 2002). These species are distributed

from Southern Africa to the Mediterranean region and India, and are found under a range

of climates and geographical situations. L. bainesii Baker is a perennial herb whose

forage value has been demonstrated in Australia (Jaftha et al., 2002). Although it has

been previously reported to be a cleistogamous species, Real et al. (2004) have conducted

molecular studies that suggest that it requires pollinators to set seed and some genotypes

are self-incompatible. There is only one report on tissue culture ofL. bainessi, where a

low frequency of plant regeneration was obtained (Bovo et al., 1986).

Limited quantities of seeds may constitute a problem for release of new cultivars

(Frame, 2004) but tissue culture may offer a solution, shortening the period of time for

the availability of propagules. In addition, in cross pollinated species such as L. bainesii,

A. latifolia and A. bicolor, each seed is potentially a different genotype. Therefore, it is

not possible to propagate a plant exhibiting exceptional characteristics through seeds

since the progeny may segregate for the trait of interest. However, micropropagation

offers a solution for the mass propagation of an individual plant.















CHAPTER 2
LITERATURE REVIEW

All plant cells have the potential to be totitpotent, i.e., to be able to dedifferentiate,

divide and regenerate into whole plants (Loidl, 2004). This was the idea that Gottlieb

Haberlandt had in mind when he first attempted plant tissue culture in the early 20th

century (Caponetti et al., 2004). Although he failed in his venture to regenerate plants

from isolated tissues, his work attracted the attention of the scientific world and,

consequently, abundant research was developed on the topic.

Tissue Culture Concepts as Applied to the Fabaceae Family

Tissue culture is usually defined as a heterogeneous group of techniques in which

explants (protoplasts, cells, tissues or organs) are aseptically placed onto a culture

medium of defined chemical composition, and incubated under controlled conditions

(Mroginski et al., 2004b). There are three types of plant regeneration systems that are

used most frequently: micropropagation, organogenesis and somatic embryogenesis.

Micropropagation consists of the in vitro propagation of selected genotypes through

improved axillary shoot production from explants with pre-existing meristems (Kane,

2004). In contrast, the other two regeneration schemes are based on the use of non-

meristematic tissues as explants: organogenesis is the de novo formation of organs

(shoots, roots or flowers), and somatic embryogenesis is the production of embryos

without a previous fusion of gametes (Radice, 2004).

Members of the Fabaceae family have traditionally been regarded as recalcitrant to

in vitro regeneration, particularly in the case of cultivated grain legumes (Griga, 1999;









Veltcheva et al., 2005; Mundhara & Rashid, 2006). Veltcheva et al. (2005) suggest that

recalcitrance in grain legumes could be caused by the narrow genetic base of the

cultivated varieties that have undergone inbreeding and selection for long periods of time.

In addition, they suggest that in forage species the outbreeding and lower genotype

selection may account for easier identification of responsive genotypes.

Some of the factors that affect in vitro response of a given species are genotype,

explant, composition of the culture medium and conditions under which explants are

incubated (Radice, 2004). The genotype of the donor plant is one of the most critical

factors since it influences in vitro responses, from the establishment of the explant to the

regeneration of whole plants, as well as ex vitro, during the acclimatization of

regenerated plants. The importance of the genotype on in vitro plant regeneration of

cultivated peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.) has been demonstrated by Chengalrayan et al.

(1998), who assessed 16 genotypes for responsiveness in vitro using a protocol to induce

somatic embryogenesis. These authors found differences in the frequency of response at

each stage of the process and suggested that genotype could be the primary factor

influencing conversion of somatic embryos to plantlets. A similar experiment was carried

out in soybean (Glycine max (L.) Merrill), in which 17 breeding lines were evaluated for

their response and ability to regenerate plants through somatic embryogenesis (Tomlin et

al., 2002). Among these lines, a significant difference in the percentage of responsive

explants, number and quality of somatic embryos were observed. Other legume species in

which differences among genotypes were reported, particularly regarding somatic

embryogenesis are M~edicago sativa L. and T. pratense L. (Lakshmanan & Taji, 2000).










For T. pretense, Quesenberry and Smith (1993) increased genotype regeneration

frequency from less than 5% to almost 70%, after five cycles of recurrent selection.

The explant type used for culture establishment depends on the obj ectives that are

pursued since it determines responsiveness of the plant material in vitro (Lakshmanan &

Taji, 2000). The aspects that should be considered in explant selection are: explant tissue

(leaves, petals, anthers, roots, meristems, cotyledons, epicotyls, hypocotyls), explant size,

explanation time, topophysis and polyphenol oxidation (Kane, 2004). It is widely

accepted that immature zygotic embryos and young seedlings are the most responsive

explants to induce somatic embryogenesis in legume species. This is because areas where

cells show active division are more responsive to the embryogenic stimulus (Griga, 1999;

Mundhara & Rashid, 2006). However, a range of explants have been used with success to

induce somatic embryogenesis in Fabaceae family. These have included mature seeds,

shoot apices, seedlings, hypocotyls, cotyledons, leaves, petioles, internodes, roots,

endosperms, cell suspensions and protoplasts (Lakshmanan & Taji, 2000). For the

induction of organogenesis in legume species, a similar variety of explants has been used.

As an example, in Arachis, several explants have been capable of regenerating plants:

fully expanded leaves (Dunbar & Pittman, 1992), leaflets from young seedlings (Akasaka

et al., 2000), epicotyls, petioles (Cheng et al., 1992), cotyledons, embryo-axes, mature

whole seeds (Radhakrishnan et al., 2000), protoplasts (Li et al., 1993), mature zygotic

embryo-derived leaflets (Chengalrayan et al., 2001) and shoot apices (Radhakrishnan et

al., 1999).

Culture medium composition is determined by the type and concentration of

inorganic salts (macro- and micro-nutrients), organic compounds (sugar, vitamins,









activated charcoal, etc.), plant growth regulators (mainly auxins and cytokinins), gelling

agents or other support system and the gaseous atmosphere inside the culture vessel

(Radice, 2004). The most widely used basal medium for legume regeneration is MS

medium developed by Murashige and Skoog (1962) for callus cultures of tobacco

(Murashige & Skoog, 1962). This basal medium, which has a high salt concentration, has

been used to achieve plant regeneration in several legume genera, such as Arachis (Rey

& Mroginski, 2006), Astragalus (Luo et al., 1999), Cajanus (Singh et al., 2003), Cassia

(Agrawal & Sardar, 2006), Cicer (Chakraborti et al., Dalbergia (Singh & Chand, 2003),

Glycine (Tomlin et al., 2002), 2006), Lathyrus (Barik et al., 2005), Lotus (Akashi et at.,

2003), Pha~seolus (Delgado-Sanchez et al., 2006), Pisum (Loiseau et al., 1998), Trifolium

(Ding et al., 2003) and Vigna (Saini & Jaiwal, 2002). However, other basal media have

been specifically developed for certain legume species, such as G. max (Gamborg et al.,

1968) and T. pretense (Collins & Phillips, 1982). Several plant growth regulators have

been used with success in plant regeneration protocols for legume species, but the type of

response and effectiveness of the compounds are highly dependent on the species and

even on genotypes within a species. In general, auxins are used to induce somatic

embryogenesis, whereas cytokinins are used to induce organogenesis. Nevertheless, there

are some exceptions such as in T. repens L., M~edicago sativa and Pha~seolus spp., in

which it was possible to achieve somatic embryogenesis by using cytokinins instead of

auxins (Lakshmanan & Taji, 2000).

In addition to media composition factors, incubation conditions under which

explants are incubated must be controlled. These include temperature, light quality and

intensity, photoperiod, humidity and hygiene (Mroginski et al., 2004b). In general, the










temperature for incubation of cultures is between 23-29 oC, depending on optimal growth

requirement of the species (Radice, 2004). In some cases, when the process to be induced

is somatic embryogenesis, cultures are incubated in the dark, since light is not required

for this developmental pathway. In contrast, when organogenesis is to be induced,

cultures are usually kept under light conditions with a specific photoperiod. In addition,

light quality (spectral quality) and quantity (photon flux) are reported to have an

important role in morphogenetic processes in vitro and on the subsequent growth of the

regenerated structures (Lian et al., 2002).

Applications of Tissue Culture for the Fabaceae Family

Since its origin in the early 20th century, tissue culture procedures have been used

for a variety of purposes, such as basic studies of particular physiological processes

because the use of tissues instead of whole plants usually simplifies the study of the

phenomenon (Mroginski et al., 2004b). Another use of tissue culture is the production of

plants free from certain specific pathogens, generally viruses, through meristem or shoot

tip culture alone or combined with thermo/chemotherapy However, the most important

application of these techniques from an economic point of view is related to

micropropagation. This method is particularly important in horticulture, since it generally

maintains genetic stability (Kane, 2004), and allows propagation of periclinal chimeras.

This kind of chimera may be important in ornamental species and cannot be propagated

through organogenesis or somatic embryogenesis. Tissue culture may also be used for the

production of interspecific hybrids where zygotic embryos abort early in their

development and have to be rescued, or in the case of plants with a rudimentary embryo

(Mroginski et al., 2004b). The production of dihaploid, homozygous plants is also

possible through anther or ovule culture, which reduces the time required to achieve









homozygosis in breeding programs. Other applications of tissue culture include the

induction of somaclonal variation, production of secondary metabolites using cell culture,

generation of somatic hybrids through protoplast fusion, and plant regeneration after

transformation protocols. From the species preservation point of view, tissue culture

constitutes a valuable technique for medium and long-term germplasm conservation (in

vitro and cryoconservation), as well as plant material exchange since pathogen-free plants

are used for this purpose (Mroginski et al., 2004b).

Production of Plants Free from Certain Specific Pathogens

Since plants were first domesticated, diseases and pests have threatened crop

productivity. Some diseases caused by fungi and bacteria may be controlled if certain

practices are used during the cultivation of the crop. However, in the case of viruses, the

control is usually more difficult and in many cases the only indication of the presence of

a virus is a reduction in crop yields. Viral diseases are transmitted rapidly particularly

when the crop is vegetatively propagated (Kartha, 1984).

Meristem culture is one of the tools to eliminate viruses from plant material,

provided that the rate of virus multiplication and movement in the plant is lower than the

rate at which the meristematic region elongates. This is often the case since vascular

tissues do not reach the meristem. In the Fabaceae family, meristem culture has been

applied successfully to the rescue of interspecific hybrids between A. hypogaea and A.

stenosperma Krapov & W.C. Gregory, and A. hypogaea and A. otavioi, which showed

symptoms of peanut stripe virus (Radhakrishnan et al., 1999). Meristem culture with or

without thermo/chemotherapy- has also been used to eliminate peanut mottle virus, peanut

stripe virus and tomato spotted wilt virus from interspecific hybrids ofArachis that were

maintained vegetatively in the germplasm collection at the Southern Regional Plant









Introduction Station (Griffin, GA) (Dunbar et al., 1993a). In contrast, shoot tip culture

was not an effective procedure to regenerate plants free of the peanut mottle viruses.

Prasada Rao et al. (1995) excised seed axes from peanut stripe virus infected seed and

cultured them on a medium containing ribavirin to obtain peanut plants free of the virus.

Meristem culture has also been successfully applied to other legume genera, such as

Trifolium and Pha~seolus, for the production of plants free of common viruses (Phillips

and Collins, 1979; Veltcheva et al., 2005).

Micropropagation

Micropropagation, the true-to-type propagation of a genotype through tissue culture

techniques, is a useful tool in breeding programs. Among other advantages, it enables the

production of uniform plants from a selected genotype at a high multiplication rate

(Olmos et al., 2004). The stages for micropropagation from shoot explants are: a) donor

plant selection and preparation, b) axillary shoot proliferation, c) pretransplant or rooting,

and d) transfer to the natural environment (Kane, 2004).

Cultivated peanut has been reported to have limited reproductive efficiency, which

is a drawback when large populations are required for breeding purposes (Radhakrishnan

et al., 2000). Micropropagation may be used to overcome this situation, provided that an

efficient in vitro protocol is available. For this species, Radhakrishnan et al. (2000)

developed a high frequency micropropagation protocol from embryo axes and plant

regeneration from other juvenile explants. Successful micropropagation protocols have

also been developed for other species such as Vigna mungo (L.) Hepper, a grain legume

important in South Asia and Australia, where plants were regenerated from shoot tips,

embryo axes and cotyledonary nodes (Saini & Jaiwal, 2002).









Production of Dihaploid, Homozygous Plants

The production of haploid plants following anther, pollen or ovule culture is

desired in breeding programs because it would result in a reduction in the number of

cycles to achieve complete homozygosity after the duplication in the number of

chromosomes of the regenerated haploid plants. Several attempts have been made in the

Fabaceae family but with little success. For instance, in the genus Arachis, Bajaj et al.

(1980) reported androgenesis but no plant regeneration from pollen cultures ofA.

hypogaea and A. glabrata Benth. Bajaj et al. (1981) reported plant regeneration from

anther cultures of A. hypogaea and A. villosa Benth., with a chromosome number varying

from haploid to octaploid. In soybean, Rodrigues et al. (2004) studied the origin of

embryo-like structures from anther cultures using molecular techniques. They found both

homozygous and heterozygous structures, suggesting that embryogenesis and

androgenesis occurred simultaneously. Anther culture in Pha~seolus resulted in callus

formation with cell ploidy levels ranging from haploid to polyploidy (Veltcheva et al.,

2005).

Generation of Interspecific Hybrids: Embryo Rescue and Protoplast Fusion

In many cases, wild species offer traits of interest that could be useful in breeding

programs if incorporated into their cultivated relatives. Nevertheless, there may be

interspecific barriers that need to be overcome in order to be able to transfer the trait of

interest. One of the possibilities to circumvent this would be to use tissue culture

techniques to rescue the embryo before it aborts, followed by micropropagation of the

hybrid if it has low fertility.

Arachis villosulicarpa Hoehne, a wild relative of cultivated peanut (A. hypogaea),

is rich in oil and is resistant to Cercospora arachidicola and Cercosporichum personatum










(Mansur et al., 1993). However, hybrids between this species and A. hypogaea could not

be obtained due to cross compatibility barriers that caused abnormal endosperm

development (Pittman et al., 1984). Somatic hybridization may be used to overcome this

incompatibility, provided that an in vitro protocol is available. For this purpose, Mansur

et al. (1993) developed a protocol for plant regeneration from cotyledons, leaves and cell

suspensions of A. villosulicarpa.

In the genus Trifolium, a few interspecific hybrids have been produced with the aid

of tissue culture techniques, such as hybrids between red clover (T. pretense) and T.

sarosiense Hazsl. where aseptic embryo rescue was used before in situ abortion (Phillips

et al., 1982). Przywara et at. (1996) regenerated hybrid plants from crosses between T.

repens and 7 nigrescens Viv. using in vitro pollination followed by embryo rescue. If

hybrid embryos did not grow, they were transferred onto MS medium supplemented with

growth regulators and achieved plant regeneration through organogenesis.

To apply somatic hybridization for the recovery of interspecific hybrids, at least

one of the parents should be able to regenerate plants from protoplasts, but both should be

able to undergo protoplast culture. In addition, it should be possible to select the somatic

hybrids (Myers et al., 1989). There are reports on protoplast culture, which in most cases

resulted in plant regeneration, in several species of the genus Trifolium such as T.

fragiferum L. (Rybcznski, 1997), T. pretense (Myers et al., 1989; Radionenko et al.,

1994), T. repens (Webb et al., 1987), 7 resupinatum L. (Oelck et al., 1982) and T. rubens

L. (Grosser & Collins, 1984). Plant regeneration from protoplasts has also been obtained

in other legume genera such as Astragalus (Hou & Jia, 2004).









Other grain legume genera where embryo rescue techniques have been applied to

obtain interspecific hybrids are Cicer and Pha~seolus. In order to determine the phase

when embryo rescue should occur in wide hybrids, Clarke et al. (2006) used selfed

chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) and selfed wild relatives to study the stage of embryo

development at which abortion occurs. Several protocols have been developed to

regenerate plants through embryo rescue after crosses between cultivated and wild

Pha~seolus species; however, no somatic hybridization has been reported for the genus

(Veltcheva et al., 2005).

Plant Regeneration after Transformation Protocols

The application of molecular approaches to plant breeding usually requires an

efficient in vitro system to regenerate plants from transformed single cells in order to

obtain nonchimeric plants (Gill & Ozias-Akins, 1999). In vitro protocols amenable to

molecular breeding have been developed for a wide range of legume genera: Arachis

(Ozias-Akins & Gill, 2001; Vidoz et al., 2006; Rey & Mroginski, 2006); Astraglus (Luo

et al., 1999), Cajanus (Singh et al., 2003), Cassia (Agrawal & Sardar, 2006), Cicer

(Chakraborti et al., 2006); Dalbergia (Singh & Chand, 2003); Glycine (Tomlin, 2002),

Lathyrus (Barik et al., 2005), Lotus (Lombari et al., 2003), Macroptilium (Ezura et al.,

2000), Pha~seolus (Delgado-Sanchez et al., 2006), Trifolium (Ding et al., 2003) and Vigna

(Saini & Jaiwal, 2002). Some examples of legume species in which tissue culture has

assisted transformation protocols are A. hypogaea (Ozias-Akins & Gill, 2001), Lotus

japonicus (Regel) K. Larsen (Lombari et al., 2003), G. max (Olhoft et al., 2003), 7

repens, 7 pratense and 7 subterraneum L. (Ding et al., 2003).










Medium and Long-term Germplasm Conservation and Plant Material Exchange

As civilization advances, the centers of diversity of many important plants for food

and forage are threatened. This situation implies the loss of valuable genes contained in

the wild relatives of the cultivated species that could be used in breeding programs. For

this reason, germplasm is kept in storage facilities, mainly as seeds, which require

considerable land and labor to be renewed. For many species belonging to the genus

Arachis, seed viability decreases abruptly after 2-3 years of storage. However, some

protocols have been developed to recover plants from seeds that would not germinate by

themselves through the in vitro culture of embryonic axes (Dunbar et al., 1993b; Morris,

et al., 1995).

Cryopreservation constitutes an alternative to the laborious and time consuming

storage of seeds. Not only does it allow for long-term storage, but it also ensures genetic

stability, requires little space and is low maintenance (Gagliardi et al., 2003). The ultra-

low temperatures of liquid nitrogen cause interruption of all biochemical reactions

protecting the plant material from physiological and genetic changes (Yamada et al.,

1991). In addition, plants are kept free from pathogens when propagated from plants that

have been indexed for the presence of specific microorganisms. Protocols for

cryopreservation have been developed for several species: A. burchellii Krapov. & W.C.

Greg., A. hypogaea, A. retusa Krapov. et al., (Gagliardi et al., 2003), A. macedoi Krapov.

& W.C. Greg., A. pietratrelliirtrt~t~r~rtrt Krapov. & W.C. Greg., A. prostrate Benth. A.

villosulicarpa (Gagliardi et al., 2002) and T. repens (Yamada et al., 1991) among others.

Medium-term conservation of germplasm can also be done by maintaining plants under

in vitro conditions, which has similar advantages as cryopreservation: little space, low

maintenance, and protection from pathogens. Moreover, plants kept in vitro are a ready









source of material in case the production of a large number of plants is required

(Bhojwani, 1981).

Although there are many reports on tissue culture of legume species, there are no in

vitro protocol s for 7: polymorphum, T. carolinianum, A. bicolor or A. latifolia, four

promising forage species. For L. bainesii there is only one report of plant regeneration

from cotyledons (Bovo et al., 1986). Therefore, the main obj ective of this research was to

develop protocols for plant regeneration of these species that may then be used to

improve their forage potential. Medium basal salts, plant growth regulators, explant type

and time of exposure were the main factors evaluated.















CHAPTER 3
MATERIALS AND METHODS

Procedures common to all experiments are described here. The modifications made

for specific experiments are described in corresponding chapters.

Plant Material

Experiments were carried out with four species representing three different genera

of the Leguminosae family: A. bicolor, A. latifolia, L. bainesii, T. carolinianum, and 7:

polymorphum (Table 3-1). Seeds were scarified using concentrated sulphuric acid (98%)

for 5 minutes (Adesmia spp., L. bainesii), 7 minutes (7: polymorphum) or 10 minutes (T.

carolinianum) and then were rinsed for 10 minutes in running tap water. Subsequently,

seeds were surface disinfected by immersion in a solution of sodium hypochlorite

containing 0.571 % W/V available chlorine for 5 minutes and rinsed with distilled sterile

water three times. Disinfected seeds were placed on half-strength Murashige and Skoog

(1962) (MS) basal medium, with 15 g L^' sucrose and 0.7 g L^1 agar (Sigmal A-1296)

in 100 mm diameter x 15 mm deep petri dishes.

Culture Conditions

Basal medium consisted of either MS, L2 (Collins & Phillips, 1982) or B5

(Gamborg et al., 1968). Media were prepared using MS basal salt mixture (Sigma

M/5524) and MS vitamins (Sigma~ M7150) mixed in proportions corresponding to

M/urashige and Skoog (1962), B5 basal salt mixture (Sigma" G5768) and B5 vitamins


1Use of brand name is for identification purposes only and does not imply exclusion of other similar brand
products.









(RPI~ G37010) were used in quantities specified in Gamborg et al. (19)68) or L2

concentrated stock solutions mixed in the adequate proportions according to Collins &

Phillips (1982). Concentrated stock solutions of plant growth regulators were prepared by

dissolving the correct quantity of the product { [TDZ= thidiazuo-;~n, 1-nphnyrl-3-(12,3

thiadiazol-5-yl)urea (Sigma~ P6186)], [BAP= benzylaminopurine (Sigma~ B3408)],

[KIN= kinetin, 6-furfurylaminopurine (Sigma~ KO7.53)], [PIC= picloram, 4-amino-3,5,6-

trichloropicolinic acid (Sigma~ P5575)], [2,4-D= 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid

(Sigma~ D6679)], [IBA= indolebutyric acid (Sigma~ 15386)] in distilled water and kept

frozen at -14oC.The pH of the media was adjusted to 5.8 with the addition of drops of 1 N

KOH or 1N HCI before the addition of agar (Sigma~ A-1296). Culture medium was

sterilized by autoclaving for 20 minutes at 0.103 Mpa.

For the first steps of all experiments, 100 mm diameter x 15 mm deep petri dishes

were used and explants were placed with the abaxial side down on 20 mL of culture

medium. After the induction, cultures were transferred onto MS medium with or without

the addition of 0.044 CIM BAP + 0.049 C1M IBA to achieve bud elongation and rooting of

shoots. To induce further growth of shoots, cultures were subsequently transferred to

magenta boxes (76.2 mm x 76.2 mm x 101.6 mm) (Magenta Corporation") containing 50

mL of MS devoid of plant growth regulators. Cultures were kept in a growth chamber at

26 & 2oC with a 16-hour photoperiod and 85 Clmol m-2 S-1 prOVided by cool fluorescent

lights.

Regenerated plants were removed from magenta boxes and rinsed under running

tap water to completely remove the culture medium and were then placed in plug trays

containing vermiculite and covered with a humidity dome. Trays were placed in a growth









chamber at 22 + 2oC with a 14-hour photoperiod. Plants were watered daily to keep a

high humidity level during the first two weeks and a solution containing 2 g/L of

Captan~ [4-cyclohexene-1,2-dicarboximide, N-(trichloromethyl) thio] was applied twice

during this period. During the third week, covers were removed gradually for longer

periods of time and plants were finally transferred to the greenhouse.

Evaluation and Experimental Design

Cultures were evaluated every 30 days for most experiments, in order to determine

the number of explants that died, remained irresponsive, produced callus or buds.

Whenever buds were regenerated, the number of buds per explant was also recorded.

Each treatment was applied to 10 explants and experiments were repeated 2-3 times.

Experiments were treated as completely random factorial experiments or completely

randomized designs.









Table 3-1. Plant material used as a source of explants in the experiments.
Species Accession No. Origin
A. bicolor U5 Lavalleja (Uruguay)
U6 Rocha (Uruguay)
U7 Paysandu (Uruguay)
U8 Tacuarembo (Uruguay)
U10 Paso de los Toros/Tacuarembo (Uruguay)
Ul l Durazno (Uruguay)
Ul2 Canelones (Uruguay)
Ul3 Rocha (Uruguay)
Ul4 Castillos/Rocha (Uruguay)
A. latifolia Ul7 Valle Eden/Tacuarembo (Uruguay)
Ul8 Mina de Corrales/Rivera (Uruguay)
Ul9 Velasquez/Rocha (Uruguay)
T. polymorphum Ul Estancia El Rinc6n/Florida (Uruguay)
U2 Uruguay
U3 Uruguay
CPI 87102
Pilar (Paraguay)
Rio Grande (Brazil)
Uruguay
T. carolinianum PI 516273 Gainesville, Florida, USA
L. bainesii Cv INIA Glencoe Uruguay
* U preceding a number is a locally assigned University of Florida number, CPI is
Commonwealth Plant Introduction number from Australia and PI is USDA/NPGS Plant
Introduction number















CHAPTER 4
TISSUE CULTURE OF Trifolium polymorphum AND 7 carolinianum

Introduction

The genus Trifolium originated in the Mediterranean region, but subsequently

spread to the Americas, Asia and Africa as well (Zohary & Heller, 1984). It consists of 8

sections and approximately 240 species, 25 of which are used as forage (Lange &

Schifino-Wittman, 2000). 7 polymorphum is a highly palatable forage legume native to

eastern Argentina, Uruguay, Paraguay, central Chile and southern Brazil (Speroni &

Izaguirre, 2003). It is an amphicarpic species that produces aerial and subterranean

flowers on the same individual. It has been reported that the latter produce seeds more

profusely, acting as a seed bank, whereas seed production from aerial flowers may be

affected by grazing and insect attacks. The above-ground flowers have a morphology that

seems to stimulate insect pollination; however, the species does not appear to exhibit self-

incompatibility and self-pollination can occur, even before anthesis (Speroni & Izaguirre,

2003). Other workers report that the above-ground flowers are almost exclusively cross-

pollinated (Daniel Real personal communication, 2006). I carolinianum is an annual

species and one of only three clovers native to the southeastern US. It is self-pollinated

and re-seeds abundantly, but due to small plant size, has only limited forage potential.

Plant regeneration has been achieved in several species of the genus Trifolium

including 7 repens, T7pratense, 7 subterraneum, 7 michelianum~~~~iiii~~~~iii Savi, 7 isthmocarpum

Brot. (Ding, et al., 2003), 7 nigrescens (Konieczny, 1995), and 7 rubens (Grosser &

Collins, 1984) via either organogenesis or somatic embryogenesis. Many of these










protocols have used explants consisting of immature zygotic embryos (Maheswaran &

Williams, 1984) or seedling derived explants such as hypocotyls and radicles (Heath et

al., 1993), cotyledons (Konieczny, 1999), or leaves (Radionenko et al., 1994). However,

these explants may not be appropriate for the propagation of selected genotypes in cross

pollinated species in which seeds coming from the same plant may exhibit different

genotypes. In this case, explants obtained from vegetative tissues in fully developed

plants are more suitable for the propagation of selected individuals. Trifolium plant

regeneration from non-meristematic tissues has been achieved using leaves (Rybcznski,

1997) and petioles (Quesenberry & Smith, 1993).

T. polymorphum and T. carolinianum exhibit low seedling vigor and low DM

production that limit their forage use. Therefore, in vitro chromosome duplication may be

used to increase plant vigor. In addition, chimeral plants could be avoided provided that

plant regeneration is obtained from single cells that were previously doubled by treatment

with chromosome doubling agents such as colchicine, trifluralin or oryzalin (Quesenberry

et al., 2003). Consequently, the obj ective of these experiments was to develop a plant

regeneration protocol that could be used for in vitro research to produce polyploid plants

of T. polymorphum and T. carolinianum with increased seedling vigor and DM

production.

Materials and methods

Trifolium polymorphum

Seeds from several accessions (Table 3-1) were germinated as described in chapter

3. Plants were maintained aseptically in magenta boxes containing MS medium devoid of

growth regulators and were transferred approximately monthly. Petioles from immature

fully expanded leaves were excised and cut on sterilized filter paper into pieces of 5 to 6-









mm length, which were used as explants. Five pieces were placed per Petri dish, onto one

of the three basal media prepared as indicated in chapter 3 with the addition of 4.5 C1M

TDZ. The three treatments were applied to all germinated genotypes and experiments

were repeated twice. Incubation conditions were the same as described in chapter 3 and

data was recorded after 30 days of culture. The experiment was statistically analyzed as a

factorial arrangement in a completely randomized design using PROC GLM from PC

SAS (SAS Institute, 2003). Tukey's HSD Multiple Range Test at p<;0.05 level was used

to compare the means of the basal media for each genotype.

Trifolium carolinianunt

Seeds were scarified and germinated as indicated in chapter 3. Cotyledons from 45

1-week old seedlings were excised and cut longitudinally along the midrib into two

pieces so that four cotyledon explants were obtained per genotype. Each explant was

placed onto MS alone or MS with 10 CIM TDZ, 10 CIM BAP or 10 CIM KINT. Five pieces

were placed per petri dish and the identity of the genotypes was maintained. Seedlings

without cotyledons were placed onto MS medium and kept in vitro for further

experiments. After 30 days of culture, regenerated buds were transferred onto L2 medium

supplemented with 1 CIM TDZ. Incubation conditions were the same as described in

chapter 3.

Results and Discussion

Trifoliant polymorphum

After 30 days of culture, the only response obtained was the formation of friable,

light brown callus that died after subculturing onto the fresh culture medium. The

statistical analyses revealed an effect of basal media, genotypes and basal medium x










genotype interaction (Table 4-1). Basal medium B5 was significantly better than the

others for the induction of callus formation in 9 of the 15 genotypes. In this experiment,

TDZ was used as the growth regulator since it has a high cytokinin activity (Huetteman

& Preece, 1993) and was reported to effectively induce organogenesis in a number of

species of the genus Trifolium and M~edicago (Ding et al., 2003). In addition, pieces of

petioles were chosen as explants, since this would allow for the propagation and

manipulation of selected genotypes. Petioles were successfully used as explants in T.

pratense (Quesenberry & Smith, 1993) and T. rubens (McGee et al., 1989).

The failure in the regeneration of shoot buds could be due to the plant growth

regulator used in the experiment, which may not be adequate to trigger the organogenic

process or might have been present in a concentration toxic for this species. It is also

possible that other auxins such as PIC or 2,4-D could be more effective. However, it

would be necessary to evaluate a larger number of genotypes since there were significant

differences among them.

Seedlings grew vigorously in vitro after slow germination, which started a week

after the scarification and continued for over a month. Nevertheless, after approximately

two months in culture, they started to decay producing few leaves even with frequent

transfers to fresh medium. This factor limited the number of replications and experiments

that could be carried out with this species. In order to determine if the presence of plant

growth regulators in the germination medium promoted multiple shoot formation, seeds

from different genotypes were scarified as in the first experiment and placed onto culture

media containing either 10 CIM TDZ or 1 CIM BAP. Germination was not enhanced but

multiple shoots were produced in some cases (data not shown). Nevertheless, the rate of










growth was very slow, and seedlings became chlorotic approximately a month after

germination started.

Trifolium carolinianum

After 30 days of culture, it was observed that all explants placed on the basal

medium devoid of plant growth regulators had died. Among the plant growth regulators

that were evaluated in the experiment, KIN was not effective for callus induction or bud

formation in any of the 45 genotypes and BAP only resulted in shoot bud formation in

one genotype and callus formation in one other. TDZ effectively induced shoot bud

organogenesis in 20% of the genotypes and callus formation in another 20% of the

explants. Moreover, the mean number of buds was considerably low (2. 1) suggesting that

the species may be recalcitrant to tissue culture (Table 4-2). In all cases, calli were small,

friable and light brown colored, but were already dead at the time the data was recorded.

Thirty days after transfer, the mean number of buds across genotypes increased

markedly from 2.1 to 18.7 and buds began to elongate although growth was slow (Figure

4-1). To achieve bud elongation, cultures were transferred to L2 medium because it has a

lower salt concentration than MS medium. In addition, the concentration of TDZ was

reduced from 10 to 1 CIM because it has been reported that TDZ may inhibit bud

elongation (Huetteman & Preece, 1993).

Almost all responses were with TDZ, indicating that this plant growth regulator

would be preferred for induction of organogenesis in T. carolinianum. In a previous

report, TDZ proved effective for shoot bud induction in several Trifolium species (Ding

et al., 2003). However, most of the reports on plant regeneration through organogenesis









in this genus mention the use of other plant growth regulators such as BAP (Heath et al.,

1993; Konieczny, 1999) and 2-isopentenyladenine (Konieczny, 2000).

Trifolium carolmiainum is an annual, self pollinated species, and therefore it has

high homogeneity and homozygosis is expected within populations and plants. For this

reason, in order to develop a tissue culture protocol, cotyledonary explants were used.

Considering that seeds from a single plant and even a population should exhibit similar

genotypes, this constitutes a suitable explant that is available in large quantities and can

be easily disinfected and handled. This is not the case in cross pollinated species because

the progeny of an individual plant may not reflect the trait of interest in the mother plant,

which generally limits the use of seed-derived explants.

Interestingly, there were unexpected differences in response among genotypes in

that explants from some genotypes were completely irresponsive while others produced

up to 35 buds. This might indicate that the population that was used in the study is not

highly homogeneous, probably due to the occurrence of some cross pollination. Another

possibility could be that the difference in the responsiveness of the genotypes was caused

by the treatment received by the plant material. For example, if some seeds had a thinner

coat, the scarification process with sulphuric acid could have affected the cotyledons and

their ability to regenerate in vitro. Another possible cause of variation could be size of the

cotyledons among seedlings, which may explain the difference in the number of buds in

the responsive genotypes.

Although it does not explain the variability observed in the experiment, it is

possible that the unresponsive genotypes were more sensitive to the high concentration of

salts in the culture medium. In this case, L2 basal medium should also be used for the









induction of organogenesis in this species. This would be in contrast to other work on

Trifolium spp which showed that the use of MS as the basal medium allowed the

development of an efficient protocol for 7 repens, E~pratense, 7 subterraneum, 7

michelianum and I isibinumpainl'"" (Ding et al., 2003).

Conclusions

In 7 polymorphum, a significant interaction between genotypes and basal media

was observed for callus production. There were also significant differences among

genotypes and culture media. However, the culture media tested to achieve plant

regeneration through organogenesis were not effective and yielded only callus. Among

the three basal media tested, a higher percentage of callus formation was observed with

B5. The lack of shoot organogenesis may have been caused by the type or level of plant

growth regulators, and therefore, other cytokinins or auxins should be tested. Moreover,

additional experiments are required in order to determine the best culture conditions to

maintain germplasm actively growing in vitro.

In contrast, 7 carolinian2um shoot bud formation was achieved in 20% of the

genotypes when the culture medium contained 10 C1M TDZ. This might suggest that in

this species a potent cytokinin is required in order to induce this morphogenetic process.

Callus formation was observed in another 20% of the genotypes, and the rest remained

non-responsive and died. This difference was not expected considering that it is a self

pollinated species, and populations are expected to be highly homogeneous. Shoot bud

elongation occurred in MS supplemented with 1 CIM TDZ but simultaneously, the

number of adventitious buds continued to increase. Additional experiments are being






28


conducted in order to achieve rooting of the regenerated shoots and an adequate growth

of the plantlets that would likely result in a higher acclimatization rate ex vitro.










Table 4-1. Mean percentage of explants producing callus from petiole pieces of T.
polymorphum in three basal media after 30 days of culture.
Basal medium
Genotype MS L2 B5
CPI. 1 0 a* 0 a 20 a
CPI.2 90 b 20 a 100 b
CPI.3 0 a 10 a 100 b
CPI.4 0 a 0 a 80 b
CPI.5 0 a 0 a 0
CPI.6 0 a 0 a 80 b
CPI.7 0 a 0 a 0
CPI.8 0 a 0 a 0
CPI.9 0 a 0 a 30 b
CPI.10 0 a 0 a 100 b
CPI.11 0 a 0 a 90 b
Urug. 1 0 a 0 a 90 b
Parag. 1 0 a 0 a 90 b
Parag.2 0 a 0 a 60 b
U 02.1 0 a 0 a 100 b
*Within rows, different letters indicate significant differences according to Tukey's HSD
Multiple Range test at p<;0.05 level.






Table 4-2. Number of buds per explant in the responsive genotypes of T. carolinianum
cultured on medium supplemented with 10 CIM TDZ after 30 and 60 days of
culture.


Genotype


30 days of culture


60 days of culture
35






























Figure 4-1. Shoot bud organogenesis through cotyledon culture of T. carolinianum, 15
days after transfer to L2 + 1 CIM TDZ (bar: 20 mm).















CHAPTER 5
PLANT REGENERATION OF Adesmia latipolia AND A. bicolor

Introduction

The tribe Adesmieae belongs to the Fabaceae family and consists of only one

genus, Adesmia DC., and approximately 240 species endemic to South America (Ulibarri

& Burkart, 2000). Most of these species of herbs and shrubs grow in the Andes

mountains and semi desert zones in the Patagonia. Some species, such as A. latifolia, A.

bicolor and A. punctat are considered promising forages because of their ability to grow

during the winter season, high crude protein value and high in vitro organic matter

digestibility (Tedesco et al., 2000). In addition, due to the stoloniferous morphology of

plants, they may be used for soil cover and erosion control (Coelho & Battistin, 1998).

Adesmia bicolor and A. latifolia are cross pollinated species although some self

pollination may occur (Tedesco et al., 2000). As a consequence, selected genotypes

cannot be propagated through seeds because their progeny could segregate for the trait of

interest. Even though these species could be multiplied vegetatively using stolons, tissue

culture could provide a more rapid and efficient method of propagation. In addition, an in

vitro protocol for plant regeneration from single cells, such as organogenesis and somatic

embryogenesis, could be used to double the chromosome number in an attempt to

increase plant productivity. Moreover, the development of a tissue culture system to

propagate and maintain plants in vitro would prove useful for germplasm exchange

(Mroginski et al., 2004b) since plants are protected from pathogens and do not require a

quarantine period. Another contribution of tissue culture techniques to plant breeding is










the in vitro selection for biotic and abiotic stresses, which has been applied in alfalfa for

resistance to specific fungal diseases (Dita et al., 2006).

It has been suggested that in forage legume populations there is greater

heterogeneity in comparison to grain legume populations, due to the lower selection

pressure of high seed producing genotypes (Veltcheva et al., 2005). This condition would

result in an easier identification of in vitro responsive genotypes. However, the

development of an efficient plant regeneration protocol implies the regulation of the

many factors that influence in vitro responses and not only the genotype. These other

factors include selection of an adequate explant, based on the obj ectives of the culture,

composition of the basal medium and plant growth regulators used to induce the

morphogenetic response, and conditions of incubation (Radice, 2004).

Tissue culture protocols have been developed for some forage legumes such as T.

pratense, 7: repens (Ding et al., 2003), A. pintoi Krapov. & W.C. Greg. (Rey &

Mroginski, 2006), A. glabrata (Vidoz et al., 2006), Lotus corniculatus L. (Akashi et al,

2003), Astragalus melilotoides Pall. (Hou & Jia, 2004) and Macroptilium atropurpureum

(DC.) Urb. (Ezura et al., 2000). Nevertheless, currently there are no reports on tissue

culture in the genus Adesmia. The obj ective of these experiments was to develop for the

first time, an in vitro plant regeneration system that could assist A. bicolor and A. latifolia

breeding programs.

Materials and Methods

Plant Material

Seeds ofA. bicolor and A. latifolia were scarified, sterilized and germinated as

described in chapter 3. Plants were maintained aseptically in magenta boxes on MS

medium without the addition of plant growth regulators. Unless indicated, explants









consisted of leaflets from immature leaves, at approximately 50% of expansion, that were

excised from those in vitro grown plants.

Basal Media Experiment

Seven genotypes of A. bicolor and 16 of A. latifolia were used as explant sources.

Leaflets were placed onto the three basal media indicated in chapter 3, with the addition

of 4.5 CIM TDZ. Each treatment was applied to 10 leaflets of each genotype and

experiments were repeated three times. After 60 days of culture, buds were transferred to

magenta boxes containing MS devoid of growth regulators for 45 days, where buds

elongated and rooted. Incubation and acclimatization of regenerated plants was

performed as described in chapter 3.

Response variables analyzed were: percent organogenesis (%= number of explants

that produced buds/total number of explants* 100), mean number of buds per explant (E

number of buds per explant/ number of explants that produced buds) and regeneration

index (index= % shoot bud formation mean number of buds per explant / 100). This

index was used in order to evaluate the influence of the basal medium on the percentage

of shoot bud formation and mean number of buds per explant simultaneously. A higher

index value indicates that a genotype is capable of producing a higher total number of

buds. These response variables were also used in subsequent experiments.

This experiment was statistically analyzed as a factorial arrangement in a

completely randomized design using PROC GLM from PC SAS (SAS Institute, 2003).

Tukey's HSD Multiple Range Test at p<;0.05 was used to compare the means of the basal

media for each genotype.









Factorial Experiments with TDZ and BAP

Among the responsive genotypes in the basal media experiment, A. latifolia Ul8.6

and Ul8.8 were chosen as explant sources for subsequent experiments, because their

micropropagation rate (2.74 and 3.12 fold increase per month, respectively) provided

adequate amounts of tissue. Explants were placed onto MS supplemented with 0, 1, 10,

30 or 60 CIM TDZ alone or with the addition of either 0, 0. 1 or 1 CIM IBA, such that 15

treatments were used. These same concentrations and combinations were assayed

replacing TDZ by BAP. Each treatment was applied to 10 leaflets of each genotype and

experiments were repeated twice. After a month, cultures were transferred onto MS +

0.044 CIM BAP + 0.049 CIM IBA for 30 days to achieve bud elongation and then to

magenta boxes containing MS without growth regulators for the same period of time.

Incubation and acclimatization of regenerated plants was carried out as described in

chapter 3.

Since both genotypes responded similarly, data were analyzed and presented as a

combination of the two; however, results for each genotype are presented in the

Appendix (Tables A-1 to A-9). Data from subsequent experiments were also pooled for

genotypes. In addition to the variables mentioned above, shoot number, length of the

longest shoot and acclimatization rate (% survival= number of plants that survived after a

month / number of plants transferred to ex vitro conditions *100) were also determined.

Statistical analyses were performed as a factorial arrangement in a completely

randomized design using PROC GLM from PC SAS (SAS Institute, 2003). Tukey's HSD

Multiple Range Test at p<;0.05 was used to compare the means of treatments. Regression

analysis was performed using Microsoft Office Excel (Microsoft, 2003).









Induction Time Experiments

The same explants and sources from the previous experiment were used to evaluate

the influence of exposure time to TDZ. Leaflets were placed onto MS + 10 C1M TDZ for

0, 1, 4, 7, 14, 20 or 30 days and then transferred onto MS devoid of plant growth

regulators. Each treatment was applied to 10 leaflets of each genotype and experiments

were repeated twice. Forty-five days after the initiation of the experiment, all cultures

were transferred onto fresh medium for 30 days, and then into magenta boxes containing

the same culture medium. Incubation conditions were the same as described in chapter 3.

The experiment was analyzed as a completely randomized design using PROC

GLM from PC SAS (SAS Institute, 2003). Tukey's HSD Multiple Range Test at p<;0.05

was used to compare treatment means. Regression analysis was performed using

Microsoft Office Excel (Microsoft, 2003). Additional data for each genotype are

presented in Appendix (Tables A-10 to A-12).

Type of Explant Experiment

The same two genotypes ofA. latifolia were used as explant sources. Leaflets were

excised and placed onto sterile filter paper where they were divided into petiole, rachis

and leaflets. Petioles and rachises were subsequently divided into 5-6 mm pieces. All

petiole and rachises pieces obtained from each leaf and eight leaflets were placed in each

petri dish containing MS + 10 C1M TDZ. This procedure was repeated 10 times for

mature, fully expanded and immature, actively expanding leaves from both genotypes.

Thirty days after the initiation of the experiment, explants were transferred onto MS

medium without growth regulators to achieve bud elongation. The conditions under

which cultures were incubated were as those indicated in chapter 3.









Statistical analysis was performed as a factorial arrangement in a completely

randomized design using PROC GLM from PC SAS (SAS Institute, 2003). Tukey's HSD

Multiple Range Test at p<;0.05 was used to compare the means of treatments. Additional

data for each genotype separately is presented in Appendix (Table A-13).

Results and Discussion

Effect of Basal Medium on Shoot Organogenesis

After 60 days of culture, shoot bud formation was observed in 18 of the 23

genotypes evaluated (Table 5-1). Four of the non-responsive genotypes (U5.3, U5.5,

Ul2.5 and Ul3.1) corresponded to A. bicolor and one (Ul9.3) to A. latifolia. Both

genotype and basal medium had highly significant effects on the percentage of shoot bud

formation. The interaction between these factors was also highly significant.

The basal medium MS resulted in a higher number of responsive genotypes and

was superior to L2 in two of them. The average percentage of shoot bud formation across

all genotypes was not significantly different between MS and L2 (22 and 16.6%,

respectively); however, both were superior to B5 (5.5%). In general, higher percentages

were obtained in those genotypes derived from accession Ul8 of A. latifolia, whereas

those corresponding to A. bicolor were the least responsive.

For the variable mean number of buds per explant, only genotype was a significant

source of variation. This was also evident when the average number of buds per explant

across genotypes is considered. This may indicate that the basal medium may have had a

maj or influence during the period in which explants dedifferentiated or acquired

competence to respond to the plant growth regulator stimulus, but once induction had

occurred, it had a low influence on the number of buds arising per explant. In all cases,









the mean number of shoot buds arising per explant was rather low and never higher than

five, although up to 20 buds per individual explant were formed in some cases.

The regeneration index proved to be useful in this study involving numerous

genotypes since in some cases a high number of buds per explant were produced, but a

low percentage of explants was responsive. Even though the identification of highly

responsive genotypes was not the main purpose of this experiment, this index proved

useful for the selection of genotypes that could be used in further experiments to adjust

the in vitro plant regeneration protocol. Averaging regeneration index data over

genotypes, the means for MS and L2 were significantly higher than for B5. However, the

index masked the effect of genotype x medium interaction observed on percentage, since

the statistical analysis revealed only genotype and basal medium effects.

The results of this experiment suggested that MS medium produced higher

proliferation of shoot buds in A. latifolia and A. bicolor than the other basal media.

Although MS was originally developed for callus culture of tobacco (Murashige and

Skoog, 1962) and B5 and L2 were developed for legume species (Gamborg et al., 1968;

Collins & Phillips, 1982), MS basal medium has been successfully used for tissue culture

of several legume genera including forages like Trifolium and M~edicago (Ding et al.,

2003), grain legumes like Cicer (Chakraborti et al., 2006) and Vigna (Saini & Jaiwal,

2002) and trees such as Dalbergia and Cassia (Singh & Chand, 2003; Agrawal & Sardar,

2006). Moreover, shoot bud induction was possible using TDZ as the plant growth

regulator, which is in agreement with reports on other legume species as A. hypogagea

(Akasaka et al, 2000), A. correntina (Burkart) Krapov. & W. C. Greg. (Mroginski et al.,









2004a), Cajanus cajan (L.) Millsp. (Singh et al., 2003) and Vigna radiata (L.) R. Wilczek

(Mundhara & Rashid, 2006).

Regarding the acclimatization ex vitro of regenerated plants, the overall

performance of plants obtained in MS treatment was markedly higher (72.4% survival ex

vitro) than those of plants obtained in L2 (38.7%) or B5 (45.6%) (Figure 5-1 E). This

higher survival rate of plants regenerated on MS may be due to reduced problems

associated with hyperhydricity. One of the factors that lead to this condition characterized

by morphological and physiological abnormalities is water availability (Hazarika, 2006).

The higher salt concentration of MS basal medium may result in lower water availability

for plant material, so that the incidence of hyperhydricity is lower in MS than in L2 or B5

medium. Low survival rates could also be due to other disorders common to plants

exhibiting heterotrophic growth in vitro, such as a low photosynthetic rate, abnormalities

in structure and functioning of stomata, and poor mesophyll and vascular system

development (Hazarika, 2006).

Influence of TDZ on Organogenesis

After 15 days of culture, shoot buds were observed in all plant growth regulator

combinations in both genotype 18.6 and 18.8 of A. latifolia. Similarly, TDZ has been

successfully used to induce shoot formation in other legume genera; however, in some

species such as Vigna radiata (Mundhara & Rashid, 2006), A. hypogaea (Gill & Ozias-

Akins, 1999), Trifolium spp (Ding et al., 2003) and C. cajan (Singh et al., 2003), explants

consisted of seedling-derived parts which are usually much more responsive than non-

juvenile tissues.

In most of these Adesmia explants, callus formation was rare and, in some cases,

buds seemed to arise almost directly from the surface of the explant. This is a desirable









characteristic since prolonged maintenance in tissue culture may result in somaclonal

variation (Ozias-Akins & Gill, 2001). For the percentage of explants exhibiting bud

organogenesis and mean number of buds per explant, there was a highly significant effect

for TDZ but not for IBA concentration or its interaction with TDZ concentration. Since

IBA effect was not significant, the average across IBA concentrations is presented. Only

the treatment without TDZ was significantly differed from the rest for the percentage of

shoot bud formation. A separate analysis was performed by excluding the 0 TDZ

treatment in order to detect differences among TDZ concentrations and acquire a more

accurate understanding of the response (Tables 5-2 and 5-3). Similarly a regression

analysis was carried out without considering the 0 TDZ treatment and the simplest model

that best explained culture responses was chosen in each case. When the 0 TDZ

treatment was dropped, numerically the percentage adventitious bud formation increased

with increasing TDZ concentration at 30 days of culture, but this increase was not

significant (Table 5-2). By 60 days of culture, there was a significant quadratic effect of

TDZ concentration (R2=0.96) (Table 5-3 and Figure 5-2). Regardless of TDZ

concentration the percentage of responsive explants increased from 30 to 60 days of

culture which indicates that some explants required a longer period of time to become

competent and differentiate buds (Appendix Tables A-1 and A-3).

The same statistical procedures and considerations described above were applied to

the other response variables. Even when the 0 TDZ treatment was dropped from the

analysis, TDZ concentration did not affect mean number of buds per explant at either 30

or 60 days (Tables 5-2 and 5-3). In some cases, the number of buds per explant of A.

latifolia Ul8.8 actually decreased at 60 days of culture at higher concentrations of TDZ









(Appendix Table A-3) due to the death of some buds. These bud deaths were probably

due to some phytotoxic effect of this potent plant growth regulator, as reported in peanut

(Kanyand et al., 1994).

The same regeneration index as in the basal media experiment was applied here

(Tables 5-2 and 5-3). This index showed a quadratic response with increasing TDZ

concentrations at 30 days of culture (R2= 1) (Figure 5-3.), but by 60 days of culture the

effect of TDZ concentration had disappeared (Table 5-3). Shoot number (Table 5-3 and

Figure 5-4) and shoot length (Table 5-3 and Figure 5-5) showed a linear decrease with

increasing concentrations of TDZ (R2= 0.87 and 0.79, respectively) (Figures 5-1 A-D).

The reduction in shoot elongation is a common response reported in several species when

TDZ is added to the culture medium (Huetteman & Preece, 1993). Shoot length is an

important factor for the success in ex vitro acclimatization since longer shoots may have

more reserves to produce roots which promote higher survival rates (Table 5-3). This was

evident in both A. latifolia genotypes (Appendix Tables A-2, A-4 and A-5) where ex vitro

survival decreased linearly with increasing concentrations of TDZ (R2=0.88) (Figure 5-

6). In addition, there was a higher incidence of hyperhydricity in plants regenerated in

medium containing 30 and 60 CIM TDZ, probably caused by a hormonal imbalance in the

culture medium (Hazarika, 2006).

Influence of BAP on Organogenesis

For most variables considered in this study, the effect of BAP concentration was

significant whereas the effect of IBA and the interaction between these factors were not.

Consequently, the mean across IBA concentrations was obtained and values were treated

as in the previous experiment regarding Tukey's test and regression analysis. After 30

days of culture, there was a quadratic effect of BAP concentration (R2=0.24) (Figure 5-7)









although the percentage of explants that had produced buds was low and some explants

remained non-responsive (Table 5-4). By 60 days of culture, the response to BAP

concentration remained quadratic (R2=0.57), but the percentage of adventitious bud

formation increased in at all concentrations (Table 5-5 and Figure 5-9). This response is

similar to what has been reported for A. hypogaea, where the addition of BAP to the

culture medium required a longer period to induce shoot organogenesis than when was

TDZ was added to the medium (Kanyand et al., 1994). Bud formation occurred in

explants of most treatments at 60 days after initiation of cultures (Table 5-5 and

Appendix Tables A-6 and A-8). Additionally, an increase in the percentage of bud

formation occurred in those that had responded earlier. This pattern was also observed in

the number of buds per explant. Similar to percentage of bud organogenesis, regeneration

index response to increasing BAP concentration after 30 days of culture was quadratic

(R2=0.25) (Figure 5-8) being highest for explants placed onto 10 CIM BAP. After 60 days

of culture, the regeneration index response was still quadratic (R2=0.48) (Figure 5-11i),

but the index values were significantly lower for explants cultured onto 1 CIM BAP than

for those placed onto 10-60 CIM BAP (Tables 5-4 and 5-5).

For mean number of buds per explant, there were no differences among treatments

after 30 days of culture, but after 60 days, the response to BAP concentrations was

quadratic (R2=0.56) (Tables 5-4 and 5-5, Figure 5-10). At 90 days of culture, shoot length

also exhibited a quadratic response to BAP concentration (R2=0.50) (Figure 5-12),

reaching a maximum at 10-30 CIM BAP and then decreased (Table 5-5, Appendix Tables

A-7 and A-9). This reduction in length at high levels of the plant growth regulator may









have resulted from the induction of numerous shoot primordia that competed among each

other and/or to the higher number of hyperhydric shoots.

The addition of BAP to basal medium has proved useful to induce organogenesis in

some legume genera such as Desnzodium (Rey & Mroginski, 1997), Aeschynonsene (Rey

& Mroginski, 1996) and Trifolium (Heath et al., 1993). Interestingly, BAP was less

effective than TDZ for shoot bud induction in A. latifolia. This is in agreement with a

report in A. hypogaea, in which several cytokinins were tested but TDZ proved to be the

most efficient (Akasaka et al., 2000).

Induction Time for Adventitious Bud Formation

In order to determine the minimum time of exposure to TDZ required for shoot bud

induction in A. latifolia, explants were maintained in a culture medium supplemented

with this plant growth regulator for increasing periods of time. It was observed that one

and four days of culture were enough to induce organogenesis in A. latifolia Ul8.8 and

Ul8.6, although with a very low percentage of bud formation (Appendix Tables A-10

and A-11).

In general, the percentage of bud organogenesis increased as explants remained for

longer periods of time in contact with TDZ. There were no significant differences

between the 1- and 4-day treatments or among 7- to 30-day treatments (Table 5-6). An

increase in the percentage of responsive explants was also observed from 30 to 60 days

after the initiation of cultures. This suggests that, as in the case of four to seven days of

exposure to TDZ, a period of over 30 days may be required for buds to arise even though

cells have been induced to follow this developmental pathway. In most cases the mean

number of buds per explant increased from 30 to 60 days after the initiation of cultures.

Exceptions to this were the case when some buds became stunted and died. However,









there were no significant differences in mean bud number when explants were placed

between on TDZ 4 and 30 days (Table 5-6). Regarding the regeneration index, there were

significant differences between 1 or 4 days on TDZ and 7 to 30 days on the medium with

this plant growth regulator after 30 days of culture. Thirty days later, the highest index

value was observed for the longest treatment, but it was not significantly different from 7

to 20 days of culture on TDZ. Several studies showed that in order to regenerate normal

shoots in A. hypogaea, explants should not remain in a medium supplemented with TDZ

for more than 7 days at 45.4 CIM TDZ or 21 days at 4.54 CIM TDZ (Akasaka et al., 2000).

In A. latifolia there were no significant differences in shoot length after culture of

explants on TDZ for 1 to 30 days (data not shown). Regression analysis for all response

variables showed a quadratic increase for length of time on TDZ supplemented medium

(R2 fTOm 0.80 to 0.95) (Figures 5-13 to 5-15 and Appendix Figures A-1 to A-3).

Another experiment was conducted with shorter intervals between treatments to

determine more precisely the number of days required for buds to arise. The percentage

of shoot bud formation was highest for 10 days of culture on TDZ containing medium,

however, it was not significantly different from percentages obtained after 5 to 9 days of

culture on TDZ (Table 5-7). There were no differences among treatments regarding the

mean number of buds per explant, and the regeneration index showed a significant

difference only between 10 days of culture on TDZ and 1 or 2 days of exposure to this

plant growth regulator but not with longer exposures (Table 5-7). In addition, the

percentages of response were lower than in the first experiment (Appendix Table A-12).

Regression analysis showed a linear increase of percentage of shoot bud formation and

regeneration index with increasing exposure to TDZ (R2= 0.92 and 0.93, respectively)










(Figures 5-16 and 5-17), but this is probably because treatments corresponded to the first

phase of the quadratic model observed in the previous experiment.

Effect of Explant Type on Shoot Organogenesis

Results from an exploratory experiment with several genotypes ofA. latifolia

revealed that leaflets were more responsive than petioles, suggesting that the part of the

leaf used as explant had a maj or influence on the in vitro responsiveness. The percentage

of bud formation was significantly higher when rachises were used as explants (Table 5-

8). Leaflet explants produced a significantly higher percentage of organogenesis than

petioles, which in general remained non-responsive. In the best case, only 16%

organogenesis was achieved in contrast to the 90% responsiveness that was obtained

using rachises from immature leaflets (Appendix Table A-13). These response patterns

were observed in both immature and mature leaves. Mean number of buds per explant

and bud formation index also showed the higher responsiveness of rachises over the other

two types of explants. For these response variables, there were no significant differences

between leaflet and petiole explants (Table 5-8).

The higher frequency of shoot bud formation from rachises may be due to the

presence of intercalary meristems in the rachises because they are the last segment of the

leaf to undergo the maturation process. Nevertheless, this does not explain that this

explant, when excised from mature leaves, gave almost as high responses as when

harvested from actively expanding ones. The only disadvantage of using rachises would

be the lower amount of plant material in cases in which few or small plants are available,

since each leaf provides between 10 to 20 leaflets, but each rachis from immature leaves

gives no more than two explants.










Regarding explant age, there were no significant differences between immature and

mature leaves although explants from expanding leaves were more responsive than those

from fully expanded, mature ones. This may be due to the meristematic activity of young

leaves with less differentiated cells that could readily respond to an external stimulus, i.e.

TDZ. In A. hypogaea, leaf developmental stage is a primary factor in somatic embryo

induction, as unfolded leaflets usually lose embryogenic potential (Baker & Wetzstein,

1998). Nevertheless, shoot bud formation was possible in a number of wild Arachis

species (Dunbar & Pittman, 1992). In contrast to what might be expected, cotyledons of

A. bicolor and A. latifolia were completely irresponsive in vitro when cultured onto PIC,

2,4-D or TDZ (data not shown).

Conclusions

It was possible to achieve plant regeneration from A. latifolia and A. bicolor

through immature leaflet culture. Shoot bud organogenesis was successfully induced in

several genotypes of both species using MS, L2 or B5 as the basal medium. Even though

there were no marked differences in bud formation frequency between MS and L2, the

former one promoted a higher ex vitro survival of regenerated plants and therefore was

used in subsequent experiments. Interestingly, A. bicolor proved to be much less

responsive than A. latifolia and all regenerated plants failed to acclimatize ex vitro.

The plant growth regulator TDZ was more efficient than BAP for shoot bud

induction, not only in the frequency of bud formation, but also in the time required for

buds to arise from explants. In general, the percentage of organogenesis increased with

higher levels of TDZ, but this was associated with a reduction in bud elongation. Shoot

length was a critical factor in ex vitro acclimatization of regenerated plants and as a

consequence, plants originated in TDZ concentrations of 1 and 10 CIM showed higher









survival rates. Despite the lower organogenesis frequency of explants cultured on BAP,

this plant growth regulator did not affect shoot length as drastically as TDZ, and in

general the most effective concentrations were 10 and 30 CIM BAP.

Shoot bud organogenesis was observed after exposures to TDZ as short as one day,

although the percentage of bud formation increased with prolonged culture in a medium

containing this plant growth regulator up to 10 days. Exposure for 30 days to 10 CIM TDZ

allowed a higher frequency of organogenesis and did not show a negative effect in shoot

elongation, which was observed in the previous experiment at higher levels of the plant

growth regulator.

A maj or influence of explant type on shoot bud formation of A. latifolia was

revealed in a follow-up experiment. A higher frequency of shoot bud formation and mean

number of buds per explant was obtained when rachises were used as explants. The age

of the source leaf was not as important as the part of the leaf placed into culture.

Nevertheless, an increase in bud formation was achieved when using explants from

immature, expanding leaves instead of mature, fully expanded ones.

A suggested protocol for A. latifolia plant regeneration is as follows:

1. Use immature rachises as explant source (immature leaflets may be used with

some reduction in efficiency if large amounts of explant tissue are desired)

2. Culture on MS + 10 CIM TDZ for 20 days

3. Transfer to MS with no plant growth regulators for bud elongation and rooting












Table 5-1. Effect of three basal media on percentage of adventitious bud formation (%),
mean number of buds (No.) and regeneration index (Indext) in A. bicolor
(U5.2-Ul3.3) and A. latifolia (Ul7. 1-Ul9.6) after 60 days of culture.
Genotype Basal Medium
MS L2 B5
% No. Indext % No. Index % No. Index
U5.2 3.3 a* 1.7 0.2 a 3.0 a 1.0 0.1 a 0" a 0 a
U5.3 Oa 0 Oa Oa 0 Oa Oa 0 Oa
U5.5 Oa 0 Oa Oa 0 Oa Oa 0 Oa
Ul2.2 0" a 0 a 3.3 a 0.7 0.1 a 0" a 0 a
Ul2.5 Oa 0 Oa Oa 0 Oa Oa 0 Oa
Ul3.1 Oa 0 Oa Oa 0 Oa Oa 0 Oa
Ul3.3 6.7 a 0.7 0.1 a 3.3 a 0.3 0 a 3.3 a 0.3 0 a
Ul7.1 50.0 b 1.9 1.1 a 6.7 a 1.7 0.2 a 3.3 a 0.3 0 a
Ul7.2 53.3 b 3.7 1.9 a 26.7 ab 2.8 1.1 a 16.7 a 1.1 0.3 a
Ul7.3 3.3 a 0.3 0 a 0" a 0 a 0" a 0 a
Ul8.1 63.8 ab 3.6 1.8ab 80.0 b 3.4 2.9 b 36.7 a 2.9 1.0 a
Ul8.2 78.6 b 2.3 1.9b 37.2 a 3.7 1.5ab 13.3 a 0.8 0.2 a
Ul8.3 17.4 a 2.2 0.4 a 24.4 a 1.9 0.5 a 3.3 a 1 0.1 a
Ul8.4 23.3 a 0.7 0.5 a 16.7 a 1.1 0.6 a 0" a 0 a
Ul8.6 56.7 b 1.6 0.9 a 46.7 1.2 0.8 a 6.7 a 0.3 0.1 a
Ul8.8 46.7 b 2.6 1.1ab 80.0 b 3.9 2.6 b 13.3 a 4.1 0.8 a
Ul8.9 53.3 b 2.1 1.3 a 23.3 ab 1.6 0.4 a 16.4 a 0.7 0.2 a
Ul9.1 3.3 a 0.3 0 a 0" a 0 a 0" a 0 a
Ul9.2 3.3 a 0.3 0 a 3.3 a 1.7 0.2 a 0" a 0 a
Ul9.3 Oa 0 Oa Oa 0 Oa Oa 0 Oa
Ul9.4 5.6 a 0.5 0.1 a 4.2 a 0.3 0 a 0" a 0 a
Ul9.5 13.3 a 0.6 0.2 a 0" a 0 a 3.3 a 0.3 0 a
Ul9.6 23.3 a 3.9 2.7 b 23.3 a 1.8 1.2ab 9.1 a 1.6 0.4 a
Mean 22.0 B 1.3A 0.6B 16.6B 1.2A 0.5B 5.5A 0.6A 0.1A
* Within rows, means for a given variable followed by different lower case letters
indicate significant differences according to Tukey's HSD Multiple Range Test at p<;0.05
level. Means over genotypes followed by different upper case letters indicate significant
differences according to Tukey's HSD Multiple Range Test at p<;0.05 level. "f Index= %
shoot bud formation x mean number of buds / 100












Table 5-2. Effect of TDZ concentration on percentage of adventitious bud formation
(ABF), mean number of buds per explant, and regeneration index (Indext) in
A. latifolia after 30 days of culture.
TDZ (CIM) ABF Buds Indextf
---%--- ---No.---
0 0 0 0
1 52.5a* 1.7a 0.9a
10 57.5a 1.9a 1.1a
30 67.5a 2.0a .a
60 71.7a 2.3a 1.6b
Within columns, different letters indicate significant differences according to Tukey's
HSD Multiple Range Test at p<;0.05. "flndex= % shoot bud formation x mean number of
buds / 100




Table 5-3. Effect of TDZ concentration on percentage of adventitious bud formation
(ABF), mean number of buds per explant, and regeneration index (Indext)
after 60 days of culture; number of shoots and shoot length after 90 days of
culture; and percentage of ex vitro survival in A. latifolia.
TDZ (CIM) ABF Buds Indextf Shoots Length Survival
--%-- ---No.--- ---No.--- ---mm--- -----%-----
0 0 0 0 0 0 0
1 65.8a* 2.7a 1.7 a 10.4" 31.3c 76.5b
10 79.2 a 2.8a 2.3 a 7.8bc 18.2b 60.3b
30 87.5 b 2.5a 2.2 a 4.5ab 5.3ab 15.0a
60 85.8 b 2.7a 2.4 a 3.3a 2.6a 4.2a
Within columns, different letters indicate significant differences according to Tukey's
HSD Multiple Range Test at p<;0.05. "f Index= % shoot bud formation x mean number of
buds / 100










Table 5-4. Effect of BAP concentration on percentage of adventitious bud formation
(ABF), mean number of buds per explant and regeneration index (Indext) in
A. latifolia after 30 days of culture.
BAP (C1M) ABF Buds Indext
---%--- ---No.---
0 0 0 0
1 2.5a* 0.3 a 0 a
10 18.3b 0.8 a 0.2 b
30 1.7a 0.2 a 0 a
60 0.8a 0.1 a 0 a
Within columns, different letters indicate significant differences according to Tukey's
HSD Multiple Range Test at p<;0.05. "f Index= % shoot bud formation x mean number of
buds / 100


Table 5-5. Effect of BAP concentration on percentage of adventitious bud formation
(ABF), mean number of buds per explant and regeneration index (Indext)
after 60 days of culture; and shoot length after 90 days of culture in A.


latifolia.
BAP (CIM)


Indext


Buds
---No.---


Length
---mm---
0


ABF
--%--


1 13.3a* 1.4 a 0.2 a 15. 0
10 65.8 b 3.2 b 2.2 b 41.7 b
30 57.5 b 2.9 b 1.7 b 30.0 a
60 50.0 b 2.9 b 1.6 b 17.5 a
* Within columns, different letters indicate significant differences according to Tukey's
HSD Multiple Range Test at p<;0.05. "f Index= % shoot bud formation x mean number of
buds / 100













30 days of culture 60 days of culture
Days in TDZ ABF Buds Indext ABF Buds Index
---%--- ---No.--- ---%--- ---No.---
0 Oa Oa Oa Oa Oa Oa
1 2.5 a 0.3 a 0 a 2.5 a 0.3 ab 0 a
4 12.5 a 0.8 ab 0.2 a 30.0 a 2.1 bc 0.6 a
7 57.5 b 2.0 bc 1.2 b 77.5 b 2.0 bc 1.5 abc
14 70.0 b 1.7 bc 1.2 b 77.5 b 2.5 c 2.0 bc
20 72.5 b 2.6 c 1.9 b 87.5 b 2.3 c 2.0 bc
30 80.0 b 1.8 bc 1.4 b 90.0 b 2.8 c 2.5 c
* Within columns, different letters indicate significant differences according to Tukey's
HSD Multiple Range Test at p<;0.05. "f Index= % shoot bud formation x mean number of
buds / 100


Table 5-7. Effect of short exposure to TDZ on bud formation percentage (ABF), mean
number of buds per explant and regeneration index (Indext) in A. latifolia
after 30 days of culture.
Days in TDZ ABF Buds Indext
---%--- ---No.---
0 Oa Oa Oa
1 Oa Oa Oa
2 2.5 a 0.3 a 0 a
3 5.0 a 0.5 a 0.1 a
4 5.0 a 1.0" a .1ab
5 7.5 a 0.8" a .1ab
6 12.5 a 0.8 a 0.2 ab
7 17.5 ab a.1 0.2 ab
8 20.0 a 1.4 a 0.3 ab
9 27.5 a 1.4 a 0.4 ab
10 35.0 b 0.9 a 0.4 b
Within columns, different letters indicate significant differences according to Tukey's
HSD Multiple Range Test at p<;0.05. "f Index= % shoot bud formation x mean number of
buds / 100


I


Table 5-6. Effect of different times of exposure to TDZ on bud formation percentage
(ABF), mean number of buds per explant and regeneration index (Indext) in
A. latifolia after 30 and 60 days of culture, respectively.










Table 5-8. Effect of explant type on bud formation percentage (ABF), mean number of
buds per explant and regeneration index (Indext) in A. latifolia after 30 days
of culture.
Immature Mature
Type of explants leaves leaves Mean
Petioles 9.1 8.0 8.6 a
ABF ---%--- Rachis 80.0 65.0 72.5 0
Leaflets 38.1 20.6 29.4 b
Petioles 0.8 0.4 0.6 a
Buds --No.-- Rachi s 2.3 2.7 2.5 b
Leaflets 1.2 1.0 1.1 a
Petioles 0.2 0.1 0.15 a
Indext Rachis 2.3 2.7 2.5 b
Leaflets 0.6 0.3 0.5 a
* Within columns, different letters indicate significant differences according to Tukey's
HSD Multiple Range Test at p<;0.05. "f Index= % shoot bud formation x mean number of
buds / 100






52







ri, J' ~u~IA














Figure53 5-.Ogngnsi nA aio ia.AB hotbdfrain 0dy fe
initatio of ult resadC, D)soteogto90dyafrinitonf
cutrs;AC)i S+ MTD n ),D n S+6 p D (a:2
mm.E)Scessfu a clmtzio of reeeae pat,4 dy fe

trnse to exvtr odiin(a:50m )














y = -0.0144x2 + 1.1876x + 66.162
R2 = 0.96


100
00
80
70
60
% 50
40
30
20
10
0


0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70
TDZ (micromolar)

Figure 5-2. Regression curve showing the effect of TDZ concentration on percentage of
adventitious bud formation (%) in A. latifolia after 60 days of culture.


y = -1E-04x2 + 0.0182x + 0.8968
R2 .. I


0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70
TDZ (micromolar)


Figure 5-3. Regression curve showing the effect of TDZ concentration on regeneration
index (Index) in A. latifolia after 30 days of culture.















y = -0.1159x + 9.4273
12
R2= 0.87
10

s

6

S4




0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70

TDZ (micromolar)

Figure 5-4. Regression curve showing the effect of TDZ concentration on shoot number
per explant (No. shoots) in A. latifolia after 90 days of culture.


y = -0.4487x + 25.642
R2 = 0.79













S 10 20 30 40 50 60 7


TDZ (micromolar)


Figure 5-5. Regression curve showing the effect of TDZ concentration on shoot length
(Length) in A. latifolia after 90 days of culture.










y = -1.2482x + 70.534
00
R2 = 0.88
80
70
60
S50
S40
30
20
10

-0

TDZ (micromolar)



Figure 5-6. Regression curve showing the effect of TDZ concentration on acclimatization
rate (% survival) in A. latifolia after 30 days of transfer to ex vitro conditions.





y = -0.0031x2 + 0.0434x + 8.2682
20
R2 = 0.24
18
16
14
12
% 10







0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70
BAP (micromolar)

Figure 5-7. Regression curve showing the effect of BAP concentration on percentage of
adventitious bud formation (%) in A. latifolia after 30 days of culture.












y = -3E-05x2 + 9E-05x + 0.0986
0.3
R2 = 0.25

0.2


0.2



S0.1


0.1

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70

BAP (micromolar)


Figure 5-8. Regression curve showing the effect of BAP concentration on regeneration
index (Index) in A. latifolia after 30 days of culture.


y = -0.0364x2 + 2.6051x + 22.813
R2 = 0.57


80

70

60

5 0

% 40
30

20

10

0


0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70

BAP (micromolar)


Figure 5-9. Regression curve showing the effect of BAP concentration on percentage of
adventitious bud formation (%) in A. latifolia after 60 days of culture.














y = -0.0011x2 + 0.086x + 1.7276
4.0
R2 = 0.56
3.5

3.0

en 2.5

co 2.0

2 1.5

1.0

0.5

0.0
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70

BAP (micromolar)



Figure 5-10. Regression curve showing the effect of BAP concentration on mean number
of buds per explant (No. Buds) in A. latifolia after 60 days of culture.


y = -0.0011x2 + 0.0825x + 0.6343
R2 = 0.48














0 10 20 30 40 50 60 71


BAP (micromolar)



Figure 5-11i. Regression curve showing the effect of BAP concentration on regeneration
index (Index) in A. latifolia after 60 days of culture.











y = -0.0195x2 + 1.0944x + 20.841
R2 = 0.50













0 10 20 30 40 50 60 71


BAP (micromolar)


Figure 5-12. Regression curve showing the effect of BAP concentration
(Length) in A. latifolia after 90 days of culture.


on shoot length


y = -0.1948x2 + 8.6392x + 1.817
R2 = 0.91


120

100

80

% 60

40

20


0 5 10 15 20
Days in TDZ


25 30


Figure 5-13. Regression curve sowing the effect of exposure to TDZ on bud formation
percentage (%) in A. latifolia after 60 days of initiation of cultures.














y = -0.0052x2 + 0.2274x + 0.3826
3.5
R2 = 0.80


2.5



S1.5



0.5


0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35

Days in TDZ

Figure 5-14. Regression curve sowing the effect of exposure to TDZ on mean number of
buds per explant (No. Buds) in A. latifolia after 60 days of initiation of
cultures.


3 y = -0.0036x2 + 0.1875x + 0.0024
R2 = 0.95
2.5








0.5


0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35

Days in TDZ


Figure 5-15. Regression curve sowing the effect of exposure to TDZ on regeneration
index (Index) in A. latifolia after 60 days of initiation of cultures.













y = 3.3636x 4.7727
R2= 0.92


y = 0.0418x 0.05
RM 0.93














0 24 6 810 1:


40

35

30

25

% 20
15

10

5

O


Days in TDZ


Figure 5-16. Regression curve sowing the effect of short exposures to TDZ on percentage
of bud formation (%) in A. latifolia after 30 days of initiation of cultures.


0.45
0.4
0.35
0.3
0.25
0.2
0.15
0.1
0.05
0


Days in TDZ

Figure 5-17. Regression curve sowing the effect of short exposures to TDZ on
regeneration index (Index) in A. latifolia after 30 days of initiation of cultures.















CHAPTER 6
PLANT REGENERATION OF Lotononis bainesii

Introduction

The genus Lotononis consists of approximately 150 species, from herbs to small shrubs,

belonging to the Fabaceae family, tribe Crotalarieae (Jaftha et al., 2002). Their broad distribution

from Southern Africa to the Mediterranean region and India indicates that these species grow

under dissimilar environments from the climatological and geographical point of view. Among

Lotononis species, L. divaricata (Eckl. & Zeyh.) Benth., L. tenella (E. Mey.) Eckl. & Zeyh. and

L. laxa Eckl. & Zeyh. have forage potential for arid areas, and L. bainesii Baker, a perennial

herb, is a valuable forage in Australia (Jaftha et al., 2002). The increasing interest in this species

has motivated some recent molecular studies to determine its mode of reproduction to assist

breeding programs (Real et al., 2004). These studies have reported that, although it has been

previously considered a cleistogamous species, it should be treated as an allogamous species in

improvement programs. Some seed may be produced by self pollination, but self incompatibility

may also be found in some genotypes.

Due to the allogamous nature of L. bainesii, seeds from a certain plant may correspond to

different genotypes. Therefore, specific genotypes cannot be propagated through seeds and other

means of multiplication would be useful. This could be overcome if a plant regeneration protocol

is developed that allows the propagation of selected plants. One such protocol has been

developed for L. bainessi by Bovo et al. (1986), who obtained a low frequency of plant

regeneration from cotyledons and leaflets. Moreover, a tissue culture protocol may be used to

solve another maj or constraint in this species, low seedling vigor, through the duplication of









chromosomes using chromosome doubling agents such as colchicine, oryzalin and trifluralin

(Quesenberry et al., 2003). Cells with duplicated chromosomes would be induced to follow

either organogenesis or somatic embryogenesis, producing solid plants instead of chimeras that

would likely result if other techniques were used. In addition, a tissue culture protocol that

results in plant regeneration from single cells would open the possibility of genetic

transformation of this species (Ozias-Akins & Gill, 2001). The objective of these experiments

was to develop an efficient tissue culture protocol for L. bainesii, which could then be used in

genetic improvement programs of the species.

Materials and Methods

Cotyledon Culture

Seeds ofL. bainesii cy. INTIA Glencoe were scarified and germinated as described in

chapter 3. Fifty 1-week-old seedlings were randomly selected and their cotyledons were excised

and cut longitudinally along the midrib into two pieces so that four cotyledonary explants were

obtained per genotype. Each explant was placed with the abaxial side down onto MS alone or

MS with 4.5 CIM TDZ, 4.14 CIM PIC or 4.52 CIM 2,4-D. Five explants were placed per petri dish

and the identity of genotypes was maintained. Seedlings without cotyledons were placed onto

MS medium and kept in vitro for subsequent experiments. After 30 days of culture, regenerated

buds were subcultured onto MS medium supplemented with 0.044 CIM BAP + 0.049 C1M IBA for

a month. Developing plants were then transferred to magenta boxes that contained MS lacking

growth regulators for the same period of time before acclimatization ex vitro. Incubation and

acclimatization were the same as those described in chapter 3.

Leaflet Culture

Genotypes used in this experiment were the same as in the cotyledon experiment. Explants

consisted of pieces of leaflets (ca. 4 mm2) including the midvein, harvested from immature










expanding leaves of each genotype growing under aseptic conditions. Treatments, incubation and

acclimatization were the same as in the previous experiment.

Type of Explants

One of the genotypes that had performed well in the cotyledon experiment was used as the

explant source. Leaflets were excised and placed onto sterile filter paper where they were

divided into petiole, petiole tip (in which the three leaflets are inserted) and leaflets. Petiole

pieces (divided into 5- to 6-mm portions), the petiole tip and three leaflets corresponding to each

trifoliate leaf were placed in a petri dish containing MS supplemented with 10 CIM TDZ. This

procedure was repeated 10 times for both mature and immature leaves. Thirty days after the

initiation of the experiment, explants were subcultured to MS without growth regulators.

Incubation conditions were the same as those described in chapter 3. This experiment was

statistically analyzed as a factorial arrangement in a completely randomized design (3 parts of

the leaf x 2 stages of development) using PROC GLM from PC SAS (SAS Institute, 2003).

Tukey's HSD Multiple Range Test at p<;0.05 was used to compare the means of treatments.

Results and Discussion

Cotyledon Culture

In the absence of growth regulators, cotyledon explants on MS basal medium remained

non-responsive and gradually turned brown. Conversely, after 30 days of culture on medium

supplemented with PIC, all genotypes produced light brown or light green friable callus of less

than 1 cm in diameter. When this callus was transferred onto MS + 0.044 CIM BAP + 0.049 CIM

IBA, these calli did not show further growth and died. Similar results were observed when 2,4-D

was used as a growth regulator in the culture medium (Figure 6-1 A,B). However, in six










genotypes, a few short roots were produced from callus on 2,4-D induction medium, but they did

not continue growing upon transfer to MS + 0.044 CIM BAP + 0.049 CIM IBA.

The addition of TDZ to the bud induction culture medium resulted in shoot bud

organogenesis in 27 out of 50 genotypes tested (Figure 6-2 A). Callus and bud formation started

approximately 7 and 15 days after the initiation of cultures, respectively (Figure 6-1 C,D). Callus

was in general dark green with dark brown areas. Considering only responsive genotypes, the

mean number of buds per cotyledonary explant was 13.6. Sixty days after culture, 48% of the

total number of buds was capable of regenerating plants (177 plants/ 367 buds). In some

genotypes, the number of plants after 90 days of culture was superior to the number of buds after

30 days, indicating that during that period new buds were produced and regenerated whole plants

(Figure 6-3 A). In other genotypes, not all the buds present after 30 days resulted in plant

regeneration. Moreover, nine genotypes produced buds but they did not elongate and finally

died.

The lack of elongation and death of buds probably resulted from the hyperhydricity of

tissues, which might have been caused by a hormonal imbalance in the culture medium. It was

observed that only 39% of plants transferred to ex vitro conditions were capable of successful

acclimatization 30 days after the transfer (Figures 6-1 E and 6-4 A). This low survival rate is

likely associated with the high incidence of hyperhydricity in regenerated plants. Besides the

influence of plant growth regulators in the culture medium, this abnormality may also result from

high water availability in the culture vessel and low light levels (Hazarika, 2006).

The growth regulator, TDZ, has been used for organogenesis and plant regeneration from

embryo- or seedling-derived explants in several species of legumes including A. hypogaea (Gill

& Ozias-Akins, 1999), K. radiata (Mundhara & Rashid, 2006), Trifolium spp., M~edicago sp.p










(Ding et al., 2003) and C. cajan (Singh et al., 2003). Nevertheless, in the latter, somatic

embryogenesis was obtained at higher concentrations of TDZ than those that had induced

organogenesis. Similarly, there are reports of somatic embryo induction using TDZ in A.

hypogaea (Murthy et al., 1995). Interestingly, PIC and 2,4-D were not effective for non zygotic

embryo induction in L. bainesii, but both plant growth regulators were reported to be effective in

A. hypogaea (Griga, 1999).

Leaflet Culture

Since L. bainesii is an allogamous species and not all progeny will necessarily reflect the

superior performance of an individual plant, cotyledons are not the most suitable explants when

the purpose is propagation of outstanding genotypes. Therefore, the previous experiment was

repeated using leaflets as explants, since they are available throughout the year and offer the

possibility of large scale propagation of selected genotypes as well as development of an in vitro

chromosome doubling protocol.

Thirty days after the initiation of cultures it was observed that, when growth regulators

were absent, explants remained irresponsive except in 22 genotypes in which roots up to 10-cm

long were produced from the cut surface of the midvein. This suggests that the endogenous level

of auxins in the leaflets may be enough to induce rhizogenesis in the absence of an exogenous

supply of plant growth regulators. Probably, the high levels of auxins are responsible for the

formation of vigorous roots in plants maintained in vitro not only from basal nodes but also from

those not in contact with the culture medium. Some of these genotypes corresponded to those

that had produced roots from callus in the previous experiment. When the culture medium

contained PIC or 2,4-D, responses were similar to those observed in the cotyledon experiment.

Although some calli were larger (up to 1.5 cm in diameter), they did not exhibit further growth









when transferred onto MS + 0.044 CIM BAP + 0.049 CIM IBA. The addition of 2,4-D resulted in

root formation in seven genotypes as well.

The growth regulator, TDZ, was effective in inducing shoot bud organogenesis in 45 out of

50 genotypes tested, four of which were also non-responsive in the cotyledon experiment.

However, the mean number of buds (3.8) was considerably lower than that obtained when

cotyledon pieces were used (13.6) (Figures 6-1 F and 6-2 B). After 90 days of culture, a 22%

increase in the number of regenerated plants compared to the number of buds at 30 days was

observed (211 plants at 90 days vs. 173 buds at 30 days) (Figure 6-3 B and 6-1 G). This might be

due to buds continuing to be formed on MS + 0.044 CIM BAP + 0.049 C1M IBA. But since this

medium had such a low concentration of plant growth regulators, more probably these buds were

already induced before the subculture. Even though the total number of plants obtained from

leaflet culture was higher than that for cotyledons, only 21% were successfully acclimatized

when transferred ex vitro (Figure 6-4 B). This high plant mortality was likely due to

hyperhydricity, of which numerous plants showed symptoms; however, manipulation of culture

conditions might have resulted in higher survival rates. It is possible that the vigorous growth of

in vitro regenerated plants resulted in high ethylene accumulation, which has been reported to

favor hyperhydricity (Hazarika, 2006).

It is interesting that more genotypes were responsive when explants consisted of leaflets

rather than cotyledons. In general, juvenile explants are preferred since they are more likely to

undergo organogenesis or somatic embryogenesis. For example, in A. hypogaea, seedlings more

than 21-days old failed to undergo somatic embryogenesis using TDZ compared to up to 97% of

6-day-old seedlings (Murthy et al., 1995). The lower cotyledon response in L. bainesii may have

been caused by the scarification/surface disinfection procedures seed received, although this is









unlikely given that much stronger pretreatments. have been reported with no negative effects

(Bovo et al, 1986). These authors obtained better responses with cotyledons as explants (66% of

bud formation in the best culture medium vs. 54% when using leaflets). In the present study,

however, a higher frequency of organogenesis was obtained following leaflet culture (90% of

explants producing buds vs. 54% of cotyledon pieces producing buds). Additionally, results in

this experiment differ from those reported by Bovo et al. (1986) in that shoots readily rooted in

spite of being in a culture medium with the potent cytokinin TDZ so rooting was not a critical

factor in whole plant regeneration. Veltcheva et al. (2005) suggest that forage legume

populations are markedly heterogeneous, resulting in an easier identification of in vitro

responsive genotypes. Organogenic genotypes of L. bainesii cy INIA Glencoe were easily

identified, which may be due to a shorter breeding history than those in grain legumes in which

the narrow genetic base limits the discovery of regenerating genotypes.

Type of Explant

Since the previous experiment showed that leaflets were capable of producing shoot buds

in the presence of TDZ in most of the genotypes tested, another experiment was performed to

asses the influence of the part and age of the leaf in shoot organogenesis. Callus formation

started within a week of initiation of cultures and shoot buds began to arise after 15 days of

culture in the six types of explants used.

For percentage of shoot bud formation, leaf part had a significant effect, whereas leaf age

and interaction between leaf part and leaf age were not significant (Table 6-1). Bud

organogenesis from leaflets was similar (85.8% from insertion explants and 83.3% from leaflet

explants) and higher than petioles (48.3%). The number of buds per explant ranged from 1.1 to

3.4 (Table 6-2) but, similar to bud organogenesis percentage, there was no leaf age by leaf part

interaction for number of buds per explant (Table 6-1). In contrast to percentage of bud










organogenesis, the mean number of buds per explant did not differ among parts of the leaf, but

did differ due to leaf age. Explants from immature leaves gave a higher number of buds per

explant (2.9) than those from mature ones (1.5) (Table 6-2).

Considering the regeneration index, there was a significant effect of the part and age of the

leaf but not a significant interaction (Table 6-1). The mean regeneration index for petiole

explants (1.1) was significantly lower than the index for leaflet or leaflet insertion area (2.4 in

both cases). However, the mean regeneration index for explants from immature leaves (2.4) was

significantly higher than the index for explants excised from mature leaves (1.5). Leaflet

insertion area from immature leaves had the highest index (3.4) over all combinations.

The advantage of using immature leaves has been reported in A. hypogaea, in which the

frequency of somatic embryo formation decreased considerably as leaflets unfolded (Baker &

Wetzstein, 1998). In A. villosulicarpa, the best organogenic frequency and mean number of buds

per explant were obtained when mature fully expanded leaves were used as explants (Dunbar &

Pittman, 1992). In L. bainesii, Bovo et al. (1986) reported up to 54% bud formation when pieces

of fully expanded leaflets from greenhouse grown plants were placed onto the best culture

medium. Although these authors used larger explants (6 mm2), Organogenesis frequency was

lower than in the present experiment. This could be due to the conditions under which mother

plants were grown, a factor that greatly affects in vitro responsiveness (Radice, 2004).

Conclusions

It was possible to regenerate plants from over 50% of L. bainesii cy INIA Glencoe

genotypes that were evaluated through cotyledon culture and 90% of genotypes through leaflet

culture in a medium composed of MS +4.5 CIM TDZ. Bud elongation and rooting was obtained

upon transfer onto MS + 0.044 C1M BAP + 0.049 CIM IBA. Although immature leaflet culture










resulted in a higher number of responsive genotypes, plants regenerated from cotyledons

exhibited a higher survival rate when transferred to ex vitro conditions. Nevertheless, in both

cases survival rates were low and this situation was related with the incidence of hyperhydricity

in cultures. When the culture medium was supplemented with either PIC or 2,4-D, friable light

green or light brown callus formation was obtained, but this callus did not show further growth

when subcultured.

Regarding the type of explants, the experiment carried out with one genotype of L. bainesii

revealed that leaflet insertion areas from expanding leaves and pieces of leaflets were more

efficient for shoot bud induction. For both mature and immature leaves, the lowest frequencies of

shoot bud formation were obtained when pieces of petioles were used as explants. Mean number

of buds per explant and regeneration index were higher for explants collected from immature

leaves.

A suggested protocol for L. bainesii plant regeneration is as follows:

1. Use immature leaflets as explants, which are as efficient as leaflet insertion areas but a

larger amount of tissue is obtained per leaf

2. Culture on MS + 4.5 CIM TDZ for 30 days

3. Transfer to MS + 0.044 CIM BAP + 0.049 CIM IBA for bud elongation and rooting

Although these experiments have improved the regeneration frequency reported for this

species, it is likely that the optimization of other factors besides the type of explant would result

in a more efficient protocol. Additional experiments regarding the regulation of plant growth

regulator concentrations and combinations, time required for organogenesis induction and

control of factors that influence hyperhydricity will be conducted to increase the regeneration

frequency and ex vitro establishment rate.





























Table 6-2. Effect of explant type on bud formation percentage, mean number of buds per explant
and regeneration index in L. bainesii after 30 days of culture.
Leaf part Immature Mature Mean
Petioles 38.3 58.3 48.3b
Leaflet insertion 100.0 71.5 85.8a
Bud formation %a
Leaflets 90.0 76.7 83.4"
Mean 76.1A 68.8A
Petioles 2.2 1.6 1.9 a
Leaflet insertion 3.4 1.1 2.3 a
Number of buds
Leaflets 3.0 1.8 2.4"
Mean 2.9A 1.5B
Petioles 1.0 1.2 1.1b
Regeneration Leaflet insertion 3.4 1.4 2.4a
indext Leaflets 2.8 1.9 2.4a
Mean 2.4A 1.5B
* For each parameter, means within columns (a,b,c) or rows (A,B) with different letters indicate
significant differences according to Tukey's HSD Multiple Range Test at p<;0.05. "f Index= (%
shoot bud formation x mean number of buds) / 100


Table 6-1. ANOVA table showing the p-values corresponding to the effect of explant type on
bud formation percentage (%), mean number of buds per explant (No.) and
regeneration index (Indext) in L. bainesii after 30 days of culture.
Source df p-value
% No. Indextf
Leaf parts 2 0.004 0.606 0.032
Leaf age 1 0.454 0.003 0.048
LP x LA 2 0.120 0.294 0.119
Error 54
Jf Index=( % shoot bud formation x mean number of buds) / 100













je /4b
L~
C


G


ii

~rS,
il
CL

r Ir 9
L
r


Figure 6-1. Organogenesis in L. bainesi. A) Cotyledon cultures 20 days after initiation of
experiments in MS basal media supplemented with 2,4-D, B) PIC and C) TDZ (bar:
20 mm). D) Shoot bud formation from cotyledons 45 days after culture (bar: 20 mm).
E) Plants successfully acclimatized 45 days after transfer to ex vitro conditions (Bar:
50 mm). F), G) Shoot bud proliferation from leaflet explants originated in MS + 10
CIM TDZ 60 and 90 days after initiation of cultures, respectively (bar: 20 mm).


A






F


-
s~





k:


F~J~ ~1~ "m~i~Pr~s~i~ rh















40 A

35

o
25

20



10

5


0 1-9 10-19 20-29 30-39 40-49 50-59 60-69
Number of buds


3A

25


40 B

35



25

20



10

5-


0 1-9 10-19 20-29 30-39 40-49 50-59 60-69
Number of buds


Figure 6-2. Number of buds produced per explant by 50 genotypes of L. bainesii after 30 days of
culture from A) cotyledon and B) leaflets.


30B

25


20


15


E 10

z5


0 1-9 10-19 20-29 30-39 0 1-9 10-19 20-29 30-39
Number of plants Number of plants

Figure 6-3. Number of plants produced per explant after 90 days of culture by responsive
genotypes ofL. bainesii through A) cotyledon and B) leaflet culture.















v01 20









5 5

0 1-4 5-9 10-14 15-19 0 1-4 5-9 10-14 15-19
Number of plants Number of plants

Figure 6-4. Number of successfully acclimatized plants in the genotypes of L. bainesii that were
capable of plant regeneration through A) cotyledon and B) leaflet culture.















CHAPTER 7
SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS

Grain legumes are generally regarded as recalcitrant to in vitro plant regeneration

due to a narrow genetic base that results in low genetic variability and a more difficult

identification of responsive genotypes. It is thought to be easier to identify in vitro

responsive genotypes of forage legumes, because they have usually undergone fewer

selection cycles and populations are more heterogeneous (Veltcheva et al., 2005). Results

reported here concur with this concept since shoot bud organogenesis was achieved in 20

to 90% of genotypes in four out of Hyve forage legume species evaluated.

Petiole culture of T. polymorphum on three different basal media supplemented

with TDZ was not effective to induce bud organogenesis, at least for those genotypes

tested. Possibly, this species is more recalcitrant to tissue culture than the others. Further

studies will be conducted to determine the most suitable conditions for in vitro plant

growth (using these aseptically grown plants as an explant source) as well as to determine

the culture conditions required for shoot bud induction, i.e., basal medium composition,

and plant growth regulator type, concentration and combinations. In T. carolinianum, an

annual native clover species, shoot bud formation was achieved for the first time through

cotyledon culture. Additional experiments are being conducted to achieve further

elongation of shoots and rooting, before regenerated plants are transferred to ex vitro

conditions to evaluate the establishment rate.

In A. bicolor, A. latifolia and Lotononis bainesii, plant regeneration was achieved

via organogenesis in 54 to 90% of the genotypes tested. Nevertheless, additional










experiments should be conducted to improve the frequency of bud formation and to

reduce the incidence of hyperhydricity in culture, which should result in higher ex vitro

survival rates.

Overall, MS was a suitable basal medium for shoot bud induction in all species

tested, except for 7 polymorphum where the only response was callus formation on B5

basal medium. In A. latifolia, L2 was as effective as MS for shoot bud organogenesis, but

plants regenerated in L2 showed a lower establishment rate when transferred to ex vitro

conditions. Among plant growth regulators tested, TDZ was efficient in all species except

T. polymorphum, where it only induced callus formation. In A. latifolia, shoot bud

formation was observed in TDZ concentrations ranging from 1 to 60 CIM. The induction

time experiment in A. latifolia revealed that 20 days of culture on medium containing

TDZ was sufficient to obtain shoot organogenesis. In agreement with other literature,

immature leaf tissues were in general more responsive in L. bainesii and Adesmia spp.

Immature rachises proved to be superior explants for organogenesis induction in A.

latifolia, and leaflet insertion areas or leaflets from immature leaves were more

responsive than pieces of petioles in L. bainesii. Although cotyledon culture resulted in

shoot bud formation in 7 carolinianum and L. bainesii, in Adesmia spp. cotyledons

remained unresponsive.

Suggested protocols for the studied species are:

T. carolinianum

1. Cotyledon culture on MS + 10 C1M TDZ for 30 days

2. Transfer of organogenic cultures on MS + 1 CIM TDZ, where new buds continue

to arise and short shoots are produced from those buds already differentiated









A. bicolor

1. Immature leaflet culture on MS or L2 + 4.5 C1M TDZ for 60 days

2. Transfer to MS devoid of plant growth regulators for 45 days, where buds

elongated and rooted.

A. latifolia

1. Immature rachis culture on MS + 10 CIM TDZ for 20 days

2. Transfer to MS with no plant growth regulators for bud elongation and rooting

L. bainesii

1. Culture immature leaflets on MS + 4.5 CIM TDZ for 30 days

2. Transfer to MS + 0.044 CIM BAP + 0.049 CIM IBA for bud elongation and

rootmng

In conclusion, in vitro plant regeneration protocols were developed for four

promising legume species. These protocols could be used to assist in breeding programs

to improve seedling vigor and DM production. This would be important for cattle

production in those countries where these species are native. Additionally, this may

allow the development of a legume alternative to perennial peanut in the state of Florida,

since to-date it is the only introduced forage legume species that has shown long term

persistence. The main drawbacks of perennial peanut are its vegetative propagation,

which increases the establishment cost, and low production in the year after planting. In

contrast, Adesmia spp. and L. bainesii cultivars could be propagated through seeds,

reducing the cost for farmers. Currently, field studies are being conducted to evaluate

field performance ofAdesmia spp. and L. bainesii to the Florida environment.



















Table A-1. Effect of different combinations of TDZ and IBA on percentage of
adventitious bud formation (ABF) and mean number of buds per explant in A.
latipolia Ul8.6 after 30 and 60 days of culture.
30 days of culture 60 days of culture
IBA (C1M) IBA (C1M)
0 0.1 1 0 0.1 1
ABF Buds ABF Buds ABF Buds ABF Buds ABF Buds ABF Buds
TDZ % No. % No. % No. % No. % No. % No.


APPENDIX
ADDITIONAL TABLES FOR TWO GENOTYPES OF Adesmia latifolia


Oa
45ab
60b
70b
85b


Oa
1.3b
2.8cd
1.9bc
3.1d


Oa
55bc
40ab
75bc
1000


Oa
1.7b
2b
2.3b
1.9b


0 a
75b
55b
75b
50b


Oa
1.7b
2b
2.1b
2.2b


Oa
3.1bc
3.6bc
2.1b
3.70


Oa
60bc
55b
80bc
95e


Oa
2.2b
2.6b
2.8b
2.4b


Oa
2.6b
2.4b
2.7b
2.7b


* Within columns, different letters indicate significant differences according to Tukey's
HSD Multiple Range Test at p<;0.05


Table A-2. Effect of different combinations of TDZ and IBA on regeneration index
(Indext), number of shoots per explant and shoot length in A. latifolia Ul8.6
after 60 days of culture.


IBA (CIM)
0.1


Shoots
-No.-


Index Shoots
-No.-


Index



Oa
1.3 ab
1.5 ab
2.2 b
2.3 b


Shoots
-No.-


Index


Length
-mm-

Oa
17.5 c
8 bc
8 bc
7.5 ab


TDZ
(I-M)


Oa "
2.2 bc
3.4 c
1.8ab
3.3 c


Oa
10 b
13ab
6.5a
9a


Length
-mm-

Oa

25 b
13 b
5 ab
4 b


Ib
10 b
9 a
5.5a


Length
-mm-



25 b
23 b
6.5 b
4ab


Oa
2.3 b
2 b
2.3 b
2.3 b


Oa
13b
8ab
8ab
5 ab


* Within columns, different letters indicate significant differences according to Tukey's
HSD Multiple Range Test at p<;0.05. "f Index= % shoot bud formation x mean number of
buds / 100












Table A-3. Effect of different combinations of TDZ and IBA on percentage of
adventitious bud formation (ABF) and mean number of buds per explant in A.
latifolia Ul8.8 after 30 and 60 days of culture.
30 days of culture 60 days of culture
IBA (CIM) IBA (CIM)
0 0.1 1 0 0.1 1
ABF Buds ABF Buds ABF Buds ABF Buds ABF Buds ABF Buds
TDZ % No. % No. % No. % No. % No. % No.


Table A-4. Effect of different combinations of TDZ and IBA on regeneration index
(Indext), number of shoots per explant and shoot length in A. latifolia Ul8.8
after 60 days of culture.
IBA (CIM)
0 0.1 1
Indext Shoots Length Index Shoots Length Index Shoots Length
TDZ -No.- -mm- -No.- -mm- -No.- -mm-

0 Oa* Oa Oa Oa Oa Oa Oa Oa
1 1.7" b b 53 b 1.4 ab 7.5a 35 a 1.7 b 10 b 33 a
10 2.5 b 6 ab 40 ab 2.2 b 5 a 16 a 2 b 5.5ab 10 a
30 2.8b 2a 8.5a 2.1b 1.5a 3.5a 2b Oa Oa
60 2.9 b 0 a 0 1.5ab 0 a 0 2.1 b 0 a 0
* Within columns, different letters indicate significant differences according to Tukey's
HSD Multiple Range Test at p<;0.05. "f Index= % shoot bud formation x mean number of
buds / 100


Oa*
60b
80b
80b
80b


Oa
2 b
1.5 b
1.6b
1.8b


Oa
1.4b
1.3ab
1.8 b
2.3 b


Oa Oa
35ab 2.3b
65 b 1.7b
55 b 2.2b
65 b 2.5b


Oa
70 b
95 b
100b
100b


Oa
2.5b
2.6b
2.8b
2.9b


Oa Oa
45ab 3.4b
75 b 2.9b
80 b 2.6b
70 b 2.1b


Oa
65b
70b
95b
85b


Oa
2.7b
2.9b
2.1b
2.4b


* Within columns, different letters indicate significant differences according to Tukey's
HSD Multiple Range Test at p<;0.05







79




Table A-5. Effect of different combinations of TDZ and IBA on percentage of ex vitro
acclimatization (%) in A. latifolia Ul8.6 and Ul8.8 after 20 days of transfer to
ex vitro conditions.
U 18.6 U 18.8
IBA (CIM) IBA (C1M)
TDZ (M) 0 0.1 1 0 0.1 1


Table A-6. Effect of different combinations of BAP and IBA on percentage of
adventitious bud formation (ABF) and mean number of buds per explant in A.
latifolia Ul8.6 after 30 and 60 days of culture.
30 days of culture 60 days of culture
IBA (C1M) IBA (CIM)
0 0.1 1 0 0.1 1
ABF Buds ABF Buds ABF Buds ABF Buds ABF Buds ABF Buds
BAP % No. % No. % No. % No. % No. % No.


Oa
86 b
86 b
13ab
Oa


Oa
49 ab
100 b
28a"b
Oa


Oa
96 b
65 ab
50ab
25a"b


Oa
83 b
25 ab
Oa
Oa


Oa Oa
63 a 83 b
50 a 36 a
Oa Oa
Oa Oa
according to Tukey's


* Within columns, different letters indicate significant differences
HSD Multiple Range Test at p<;0.05


Oa
5 a
40b
45 b
10ab


Oa
1.5ab
3.9b
3.8 b
3ab


Oa
10 a
85b
25 a
15 a


Oa
4 b
3.5b
2ab
1.5ab


Oa
10ab
45b
40 b
45 b


Oa
0.5 a
2.7a
2.9 a
1.8 a


* Within columns, different letters indicate significant differences according to Tukey's
HSD Multiple Range Test at p<;0.05


































Table A-8. Effect of different combinations of BAP and IBA on percentage of
adventitious bud formation (ABF) and mean number of buds per explant in A.
latifolia Ul8.8 after 30 and 60 days of culture.
30 days of culture 60 days of culture
IBA (CIM) IBA (CIM)
0 0.1 1 0 0.1 1
ABF Buds ABF Buds ABF Buds ABF Buds ABF Buds ABF Buds
BAP
(CIM) % No. % No. % No. % No. % No. % No.
O Oa* 0 0 Oa 0 Oa 0 Oa Oa Oa Oa Oa
1 Sa 0.5 0"Oa 0 Oa 20" a l 35ab 1.3" a" Oa
10 10 a 0.5 45b 1.3 20 a 1.2 60b 2.8 b 90 c 3.9 b 75b 2.5 b
30 5 a 0.5 0" a 0" a 80b 2.9 b 65bc 3.5 b 90b 2.3 b
60 5 a 0.5 0" a 0" a 75b 4.8 c 85bc 3.3 b 70b 3 b
* Within columns, different letters indicate significant differences according to Tukey's
HSD Multiple Range Test at p<;0.05


Table A-7. Effect of different combinations of BAP and IBA on regeneration index
(Indext) and shoot length in A. latifolia Ul8.6 after 60 days of culture.
IBA (CIM)


0.1
Index Length
|--mm--


Indext

|
0.2 ab
1.5 bc
1.6 c
0.3a"b


Index
| de
0 a
0.1 a
1.4 a
1.2 a
0.9a


Length
--mm--


Length
--mm--


BAP (CIM)


0 a
0.4 a
3 b
0.5 a
0.3a


0
40
42.5
5
0


* Within columns, different letters indicate significant differences according to Tukey's
HSD Multiple Range Test at p<;0.05. "f Index= % shoot bud formation x mean number of
buds / 100












Table A-9. Effect of different combinations of BAP and IBA on regeneration index
(Indext) and shoot length in A. latifolia Ul8.8 after 60 days of culture.
IBA (CIM)
0 0.1 1
Indext Length Index Length Index Length
BAP (uM) | --mm-- |--mm-- |--mm--
0 Oa* 0 Oa 0 Oa 0
1 0.4 ab 30 0.4" a 0" a
10 1.7 bc 40 3.5 b 58 1.9 b 50
30 2.4c"d 40 2.3b 33 2.1b 33
60 3.6d 30 2.8 b 20 2.1 b 20
Within columns, different letters indicate significant differences according to Tukey's
HSD Multiple Range Test at p<;0.05. "f Index= % shoot bud formation x mean number of
buds / 100







Table A-10. Effect of different times of exposure to TDZ on bud formation percentage
(ABF), mean number of buds per explant and regeneration index (Indext) in
A. latifolia Ul8.6 after 30 and 60 days of culture, respectively.
30 days of culture 60 days of culture
ABF Buds Indext ABF Buds Index
Days in TDZ --%-- --No.-- --%-- --No.--


0 Oa Oa Oa Oa 0 0
1 Oa Oa Oa Oa 0 0
4 25 ab 1.7 b 0.4 ab 35 ab 2.8 0.9
7 80 bc 2.3 b 1.8 c 85 bc 2.3 1.9
14 75 bc 1.6 b 1.2 bc 75 bC 2.2 1.7
20 70 bc 2.9 b 2 c 85 bc 2.6 2.2
30 90 1.9 b 1.8 c 95 c 3 3
* Within columns, different letters indicate significant differences according to Tukey's
HSD Multiple Range Test at p<;0.05. "f Index= % shoot bud formation x mean number of
buds / 100












Table A-1 1. Effect of different times of exposure to TDZ on bud formation percentage
(ABF), mean number of buds per explant and regeneration index (Indext) in
A. laifolia Ul8.8 after 30 and 60 days of culture, respetively
30 days of culture 60 days of culture
ABF Buds Indext ABF Buds Index
Days in TDZ --%-- --No.-- --%-- --No.--
0 Oa* Oa Oa Oa Oa 0
1 5 a 0.5" ab .1ab 5 a 0.5 a 0.1
4 0 a 0 a 0 25 a 1.3 a 0.4
7 35 b 1.8 ab 0.6 abc 70 b 1.6 ab 1.2
14 65 b 1.8 ab 1.2 bc 80 b 2.9 b 2.3
20 75 b 2.2 b 1.7 c 90 b 2 ab 1.9
30 70 b 1.6 ab a. bc 85 b 2.5 b 2.1
* Within columns, different letters indicate significant differences according to Tukey's
HSD Multiple Range Test at p<;0.05. "f Index= % shoot bud formation x mean number of
buds / 100


Table A-12. Effect of short exposure to TDZ on bud formation percentage (ABF), mean
number of buds per explant and regeneration index (Indext) in A. latifolia
Ul8.6 and Ul8.8 after 30 das of culture.
Ul8.6 Ul8.8
ABF Buds Indext ABF Buds Index
Days in TDZ --%-- --No.-- --%-- --No.--


0
0
0.5
1
0.5
1
1.2
1
1.9
1.8
0.7


0




1.5
0.5
0.5
1.2


1.1


0
0
5
10
5
5
20
15
25
25
25


Oai

0 a
Oa
5 ab
10ab
5 ab
20 abc
15 a
30 bc
45 c


0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10


* Different letters indicate significant differences according to Tukey's HSD Multiple
Range Test at p<:0.05. "f Index= % shoot bud formation x mean number of buds / 100













Table A-13. Effect of explant type on bud formation percentage (ABF), mean number of
buds per explant and regeneration index (Indext) in A. latifolia Ul8.6 and
Ul8.8 after 30 days of culture.


Indextl ABF
--%--


Ul8.6
ABF Buds
--%-- --No.--


Ul8.8
Buds
--No.--


Index


Types of
explants
Petioles
Rachi s
Leaflets
Petioles
Rachis
Leaflets


10.3a
90
48.8bc
16 a
80 ed
37.5 ab


1.5 ab
3.5 b
1.3 ab
0.8 a
4.3 c
a 1


0.3 a
3.5
0.8 a
0.2 a
4.3 b
0.6 a


7.9 a
70"
27.5ab
0 a
50 bc
3.8 a


Immature
leaves

Mature
leaves


* Within columns, different letters indicate significant differences according to Tukey's
HSD Multiple Range Test at p<;0.05. "f Index= % shoot bud formation x mean number of
buds / 100










































y = -0.0061x2 + 0.238x + 0.0791
R2 = 0.88


=-0.1565x2 + 7.3789x 3.5616


90
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0


0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35
Days in TDZ

Figure A-1. Regression curve sowing the effect of exposure to TDZ on bud formation
percentage (%) in A. latifolia after 30 days of initiation of cultures.


0 5 10 15 20
Days in TDZ


25 30


Figure A-2. Regression curve sowing the effect of exposure to TDZ on mean number of
buds per explant (No. Buds) in A. latifolia after 30 days of initiation of
cultures.












2 r
1.8 R2 = 0.90

1.6
1.4
1.2*



0.6
0.4
0.2*


0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35

Days in TDZ


Figure A-3. Regression curve sowing the effect of exposure to TDZ on regeneration
index (Index) in A. latifolia after 30 days of initiation of cultures.
















LIST OF REFERENCES


Agrawal V & Sardar PR (2006) In vitro propagation of Cassia angustifolia through
leaflet and cotyledon derived calli. Biologia Plantarum 50 (1): 118-122

Akasaka Y, Daimon H & Masahiro M (2000) Improved plant regeneration from cultured
leaf segments in peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.) by limited exposure to thidiazuron.
Plant Science 156: 169-175

Akashi R, Kawano T, Hashiguchi M, Kutsuna Y, Hoffmann-Tsay S & Hoffmann F
(2003) Super roots in Lotus corniculatus: A unique tissue culture and regeneration
system in a legume species. Plant and Soil 255: 27-33

Bajaj YPS, Labana KS & Dhanju MS (1980) Induction of pollen-embryos and pollen-
callus in anther cultures of Arachis hypogaea and A. glabrata. Protoplasma 1 03:
397-399

Bajaj YPS, Ram AK, Labana KS & Singh H (1981) Regeneration of genetically variable
plants from the anther-derived callus ofArachis hypogaea and Arachis villosa.
Plant Science Letters 23: 35-39

Baker CM & Wetzstein HY (1998) Leaflet development, induction time, and medium
influence somatic embryogenesis in peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.). Plant Cell
Reports 17: 925-929

Barik DP, Mohapatra U & Chand PK (2005) High frequency in vitro regeneration of
Lathyrus sativus L. Biologia Plantarum 49 (4): 637-639

Bhojwani SS (1981) A tissue culture method for propagation and low temperature storage
of Trifolium repens genotypes. Physiologia Plantarum 52: 187-190

Bovo OA, Mroginski LA & Rey HY (1986) Regeneration of plants from callus tissue of
the pasture legume Lotononis bainesii. Plant Cell Reports 5: 295-297

Caponetti JD, Gray DJ & Trigiano RN (2004) History of plant tissue culture. In: Trigiano
RN & Gray DJ (eds) Plant development and biotechnology, (pp. 9-15). CRC Press,
Boca Raton, Florida, USA

Chakraborti D, Sarkar A & Das S (2006) Efficient and rapid in vitro plant regeneration
system for Indian cultivars of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.). Plant Cell, Tissue and
Organ Culture 86 (1): 117-123









Cheng M, Hsi DCH & Phillips GC (1992) In vitro regeneration of Valencia-type peanut
(Arachis hypogaea L.) from cultured petiolules, epicotyl sections and other
seedling explants. Peanut Science 19: 82-87

Chengalrayan K, Mhaske VB & Hazra S (1998) Genotypic control of peanut somatic
embryogenesis. Plant Cell Reports 17: 522-525

Chengalrayan K, Hazra S & Gallo-Meagher M (2001) Histological analysis of somatic
embryogenesis and organogenesis induced from mature zygotic embryo-derived
leaflets of peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.). Plant Science 161: 415-421

Clarke HJ, Wilson JG, Kuo I, Lulsdorf MM, Mallikarjuna N, Kuo J & Siddique KHM
(2006) Embryo rescue and plant regeneration in vitro of selfed chickpea (Cicer
arietinum L.) and its wild annual relatives. Plant Cell, Tissue and Organ Culture
85: 197-204

Coelho LGM & Battistin A (1998) Meiotic behaviour of Adesmia DC. (Leguminosae-
Faboideae) species native to Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil. Genet. Mol. Biol. 21 (3)

Collins GB & Phillips GC (1982) In vitro tissue culture and plant regeneration in
Trifolium pretense L. In: Earle ED & Demarly Y (eds), Regeneration from cells
and tissue culture, (pp. 22-34). Praeger Scientific Publishing, New York

Crews TE & Peoples MB (2004) Legume versus fertilizer sources of nitrogen: ecological
tradeoffs and human needs. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment 102: 279-297

Delgado-Sanchez P, Saucedo-Ruiz M, Guzman-Maldonado SH, Villordo-Pineda E,
Gonzalez-Chavira M & Fraire-Velazquez S, Acosta-Gallegos JA & Mora-Aviles A
(2006) An organogenic plant regeneration system for common bean (Pha~seolus
vulgaris L.). Plant Science 170: 822-827

Ding YL, Aldao-Humble G, Ludlow E, Drayton M, Lin YH, Nagel J, Dupal M, Zhao G,
Pallaghy C, Kalla R, Emmerling M & Spangenberg G (2003) Efficient plant
regeneration and Agrobacterium-mediated transformation in M~edicago and
Trifolium species. Plant Science 165: 1419-1427

Dita M.A, Rispail N, Prats E, Rubiales D & Singh KB (2006) Biotechnology approaches
to overcome biotic and abiotic stress constraints in legumes. Euphytica 147: 1-24

Dodd MB & Orr SJ (1995) Seasonal growth, phosphate response, and drought tolerance
of 11 perennial legume species grown in a hill-country soil. New Zealand Journal
of Agricultural Research 38: 7-20

Dunbar KB & Pittman RN (1992) Adventitious shoot formation from mature leaf
explants ofArachis species. Crop Science 32: 1353-1356

Dunbar KB, Pinnow DL, Morris JB & Pittman RN (1993a) Virus elimination from
interspecific Arachis hybrids. Plant Disease 77: 517-520