<%BANNER%>

Pressure Drop and Heat Transfer in Inverted Film Boiling Hydrogen

xml version 1.0 encoding UTF-8
REPORT xmlns http:www.fcla.edudlsmddaitss xmlns:xsi http:www.w3.org2001XMLSchema-instance xsi:schemaLocation http:www.fcla.edudlsmddaitssdaitssReport.xsd
INGEST IEID E20101208_AAAAIT INGEST_TIME 2010-12-08T13:19:17Z PACKAGE UFE0017524_00001
AGREEMENT_INFO ACCOUNT UF PROJECT UFDC
FILES
FILE SIZE 2070 DFID F20101208_AABAFF ORIGIN DEPOSITOR PATH pasch_j_Page_182.txt GLOBAL false PRESERVATION BIT MESSAGE_DIGEST ALGORITHM MD5
bcb1acc5da109c9e49cd345c94d0d827
SHA-1
88d2833caf52433860f5fff8f7b0ed4f499f9869
1983 F20101208_AABAER pasch_j_Page_168.txt
4c4c327459964474afec8f538c568345
c2da489698ef12c0a323c7742e687d1ed39aa365
595457 F20101208_AAAZIC pasch_j_Page_151.jp2
28e4e5e42c802f3e9ce5f1ce97faa501
45d56ac3b69195cf56fcea728a868a9741a6011c
594000 F20101208_AAAZHO pasch_j_Page_137.jp2
d299fb0d1073fbfb94cb5b3d3e85c09d
7c0fa0f9525789e3a559e6bd65e9b8e63d717764
128 F20101208_AABAFG pasch_j_Page_183.txt
440cd3a9c53e135c1c2e8382218ef250
0807b12046ab035141de09455a60c879608f502a
609641 F20101208_AAAZID pasch_j_Page_152.jp2
028e42aa3ddd4634a3640d5444777bf3
c6e5ed8e44749c5dc7619612098b468a6affa76a
582127 F20101208_AAAZHP pasch_j_Page_138.jp2
fce98517a18b9aa06d05b89a41977c03
621e3b3ff24fd56d433ed394a5e213819531b69f
2366 F20101208_AABAFH pasch_j_Page_184.txt
aa81eb44bc35ecefa5bbe135b2762a18
6b387a26cd37c0dfe2449e3e4444848303111c10
2188 F20101208_AABAES pasch_j_Page_169.txt
975f1f3021d82420eb594e82b7e15e2b
83f151e833d631c617116f192840a91185e27e17
603149 F20101208_AAAZIE pasch_j_Page_153.jp2
5c9e2993b353680f0fc9ecb6b03cb4e5
785f117700bea544b6ce8986cf3168604585bb56
603082 F20101208_AAAZHQ pasch_j_Page_139.jp2
f8c6d131718fe640ae25763b26d1a01d
266fb392606711afe26df7261eb0d8455bbf1c4e
2415 F20101208_AABAFI pasch_j_Page_185.txt
e1a4c1855d96e25548662d380cfb946a
ea5f85861c890db5dd05be38b58560eefd1a4da3
2173 F20101208_AABAET pasch_j_Page_170.txt
f4edb27e0efaf734dc1dc8871548d402
25e9dd6b624908e099c5040f8b3b7f4a42956751
601684 F20101208_AAAZIF pasch_j_Page_154.jp2
eecc2a3296c8ab7c3a7e3d884781282b
159317270283c879120b01ae7f05f3cf51b2dee5
594771 F20101208_AAAZHR pasch_j_Page_140.jp2
90941d7e7d5803ba68b8a8166554d6d3
5d5f077529b40ecf6c4cca68b1297083a92ae707
2696 F20101208_AABAFJ pasch_j_Page_186.txt
8e27530e2368f17279db9382fc16da80
516c6737831828e2ab4fe92e219b0e38e6c15538
2046 F20101208_AABAEU pasch_j_Page_171.txt
3f1c9eba8ab38851bae75b0a940b91b1
51b46291546947b1ab340d23df8d20054401e0bc
591317 F20101208_AAAZIG pasch_j_Page_155.jp2
3cc0a7fb31188f3915e145fbf8d3cad0
3a1a5db287f44fcb9a13071484461ac226529262
583479 F20101208_AAAZHS pasch_j_Page_141.jp2
3b5a800f36bed429867560079ba406f6
4d8574dd6e467ff2e6b4f9f6aeacb5fc3bd7fe6f
2791 F20101208_AABAFK pasch_j_Page_187.txt
84d6f1e714ab915aa363eaeba148d495
97e99edd9f2408fc1e3915f633b67b4c2aef145e
2079 F20101208_AABAEV pasch_j_Page_172.txt
983d63f2f91c7ec86d5c619275d2e6b5
1cd52ac2adf0a7489e89e8816b983cda9cb711ce
632848 F20101208_AAAZIH pasch_j_Page_156.jp2
1e19690e738ce0ddc0d28ed101fe7507
fb33e981e0021760f69d6db1404a664ed8f83ef9
581749 F20101208_AAAZHT pasch_j_Page_142.jp2
7e1dac884a652f830afc1108accb2770
a77706b34e13130bb330b1f0a76cbabe7e23d508
2528 F20101208_AABAFL pasch_j_Page_188.txt
3d9f0d6ac2a058d47e731dcb01448820
6c21850d8fd22844dfb40c29f164f725a874d8b6
2049 F20101208_AABAEW pasch_j_Page_173.txt
cb7056bb1e551eafe9e3075690f8be14
675de8d27fe055ddb5d870cc2ac7a9bdd2f41b99
597795 F20101208_AAAZII pasch_j_Page_157.jp2
99f740099adaaf707d7c0330635637a4
9715b12ac8aaefed99c9c1e022183db546c65bf7
606101 F20101208_AAAZHU pasch_j_Page_143.jp2
02c8fd90886ca2c977933898618d7e85
6631cad154f1cf2e555f5f1cb465b39fa64dd909
29255 F20101208_AABAGA pasch_j_Page_006.QC.jpg
fffed3d3d4f526d7f99e57399f90858a
02a6effe522bc78e8e77a3f74d417055f6482dc9
2486 F20101208_AABAFM pasch_j_Page_189.txt
7a42fbc94a5e09180f2c2ffc389932ae
72243ebe70dec0441f2694565edb627940f1b9b5
1967 F20101208_AABAEX pasch_j_Page_174.txt
1e802a71190b18642376d5f641e1d846
80df7dc5cb20961696c4bfd6e45146b1bc6906e8
605303 F20101208_AAAZIJ pasch_j_Page_158.jp2
26d23b02bf23976c203a91b8e901f0d4
ea271bd898245fac88efedee641e445fe9831502
620663 F20101208_AAAZHV pasch_j_Page_144.jp2
b07f9d26ff7588ffa02e4c052dbcd5a6
507d69bf60b0b55da72a9145cfbdbb363b0e651d
4365 F20101208_AABAGB pasch_j_Page_007thm.jpg
ace0a188a746894c330683a8a9f7e8e3
462e040e04fc239d60480ad80ccf9e303f6c61dd
857 F20101208_AABAFN pasch_j_Page_190.txt
73cfb3ae4dbb353e5a9205ad75aa8989
c43dbb5ffe1dddc9eb1a7e12c4602d27b1473f00
1030 F20101208_AABAEY pasch_j_Page_175.txt
f1a14a605a6c40df947f1e89ab2567c4
d56f732d2ebc6506f3156ad7a16842c8626729c4
602330 F20101208_AAAZIK pasch_j_Page_159.jp2
22d31f003f2a80812b448aab96402cbf
706b911e5ee5bad9e5aef3d59eb86028b24f478a
616111 F20101208_AAAZHW pasch_j_Page_145.jp2
d6bf548018c55cc28ae44737c940eb77
3d6baabf13654407e0c6e266b2e6f91a6eded699
17727 F20101208_AABAGC pasch_j_Page_007.QC.jpg
8fac255e10f84d3207c292bd729aff32
a52ad667b89933d085cd5f34daead52822e5f2ca
1974 F20101208_AABAFO pasch_j_Page_001thm.jpg
ec8f5f08823187365acdbb0ef38c3ca7
45da8d969a5c74d3da8322da069dd669dfc16594
1099 F20101208_AABAEZ pasch_j_Page_176.txt
dbee872305bca4cedce6ebc0f4cc7393
7c75e719ff49d1e7904e395c238f24fbd5d59be2
597160 F20101208_AAAZIL pasch_j_Page_160.jp2
754fb8a019d9e3c4bf789a3165e3e821
083a753078b201a528729dfa925e88c2b285278e
608705 F20101208_AAAZHX pasch_j_Page_146.jp2
eb79d6629ba544ae0978fbc0c54c28e3
7eef582eb1e2aa46a4410b2d806271afc6644208
7890 F20101208_AABAGD pasch_j_Page_008thm.jpg
0ec006a296a1f33e814235a132b5dd52
c82d2b9ae57ffdb55e84f0892ca2c519fd95c534
4280942 F20101208_AABAFP pasch_j.pdf
469c2c1ffb52f7f4bb27ef427230aee4
8031368816436311665c9f9e65d2a3da8f934739
603890 F20101208_AAAZIM pasch_j_Page_161.jp2
3bddfdc4a0a7ed3deca4b83ba51b5e15
316053c1d0ea1d6dd23963b56d1cd6ef06b1e3e2
631985 F20101208_AAAZHY pasch_j_Page_147.jp2
59b3d0021c70cc46954a5ba6c50b38c0
4d668ac38c3af1e674f98b36b258faee948b3716
57245 F20101208_AAAZJA pasch_j_Page_175.jp2
ebd74ccf85cff5844b413fb1dcae16fb
5d8a0ddbc7a2ccdcc99782ea086c66ceed6339ad
34242 F20101208_AABAGE pasch_j_Page_008.QC.jpg
618ece1c94b3cf186e3f24eccb55c8f0
beb35bd000652b561a47aea633feb3c0344e7b6b
7584 F20101208_AABAFQ pasch_j_Page_001.QC.jpg
698f58969265916486b047c49db17894
c1108635e9d342505cf99b1ee92f53e0c259f823
611110 F20101208_AAAZIN pasch_j_Page_162.jp2
d86ed6cc9dd5ad63a08091db0863196a
9a0fc36dca729ca528aa4a5cb145662b76514298
617799 F20101208_AAAZHZ pasch_j_Page_148.jp2
b795f119b3c74434a51eacdbcfbb2e7a
32b34a46d499456e221927fd2a00336869bf23f1
740280 F20101208_AAAZJB pasch_j_Page_176.jp2
f878b932207ea3aa69843a82d2b029cd
2ac5cb5e51a9d0fceba1705c60a0562afb4f7269
7429 F20101208_AABAGF pasch_j_Page_009thm.jpg
d197116759d5eacd85630a8db4c893b8
33b2957c2e22b980760563b1fb1526e7ba487b46
608 F20101208_AABAFR pasch_j_Page_002thm.jpg
341309cc17dbf8af16c9e99fd564cb6b
0aad0ad487c5f48d506c7db8cc222431491f4d00
592406 F20101208_AAAZIO pasch_j_Page_163.jp2
8317dde68c9634776bb1e4ef3c1c8c5a
94e68a0f7738c2ce6637af78daab4d74574f2cf8
749850 F20101208_AAAZJC pasch_j_Page_177.jp2
54255b75292d11ddcb21b5aae146209b
7c61197020d44a5c4baf7251aba9d6c503ca260c
32819 F20101208_AABAGG pasch_j_Page_009.QC.jpg
e3736bd5586a57205b33bdf3eb45042e
351b664b3d27de984311ad0c64e93234f5a3ae65
1526 F20101208_AABAFS pasch_j_Page_002.QC.jpg
9229fbb318bcca0ea1d1bbe31b1bb40e
78412162f30d084998ee2db1e613a18f5fa0d4b6
625135 F20101208_AAAZIP pasch_j_Page_164.jp2
d76ed86808cb91190c216f165f000d14
6e38892735c79a0d29733d99edb76f86c2a7b20e
1051979 F20101208_AAAZJD pasch_j_Page_178.jp2
cf8b05cc92b5f183a8a49e606ca54a2b
30dc901f04c8583631ca53e5fa004e065f2fa771
7348 F20101208_AABAGH pasch_j_Page_010thm.jpg
3cff442b85503f043e534444f050d72b
718b0d9c5f68d7f0947ce0e345be68831621fe08
635705 F20101208_AAAZIQ pasch_j_Page_165.jp2
05dbc53c58608d5ea068b654889414c0
05adeef230f36f2e7fbd094aeb8f7ba1747552be
1020640 F20101208_AAAZJE pasch_j_Page_179.jp2
ada614dd1aee8644883e4cec5a67e167
738f9cb90b5ad2b3450fcd3c62705709f363d3d1
32604 F20101208_AABAGI pasch_j_Page_010.QC.jpg
bbe7bd27bf1974aa6b2ef201ad77f74f
0acd4ee32f99c1738c71fc603a1c7a71e4f78218
1474 F20101208_AABAFT pasch_j_Page_003thm.jpg
16e4dcc4d00aa99cb8eddbadfeba1f23
a34519b78ed2972c1f361d3401968365da86811c
109056 F20101208_AAAZJF pasch_j_Page_180.jp2
df82cb5e7d13c3a4f0a6972a90edc3b0
e56b4370be771cfc6cec4962c40f98fe358575a4
613242 F20101208_AAAZIR pasch_j_Page_166.jp2
4363a3c2e648075a97e647a199476ada
8f002844e5e70d954775c7e287c0424bf5f4c990
2446 F20101208_AABAGJ pasch_j_Page_011thm.jpg
e80a1cd097b9bf38e551aee6c9a44e1a
0816cdd49ef13c762d3fb9b91e1129d511995c0e
4881 F20101208_AABAFU pasch_j_Page_003.QC.jpg
d6d8bfa716e4a488cfcdd016ef639200
75b85df622ba628b1836c828c4ac03332c9e8cb7
105422 F20101208_AAAZJG pasch_j_Page_181.jp2
9d6115d70c79f97b2f398e0dbff27cda
28901c8840964c2f4e11c31fc73d62a50bd06f54
544685 F20101208_AAAZIS pasch_j_Page_167.jp2
6dcc7046ea190777540170e056d22c81
9386de3fc1bf66c6990fc2115bf4ac22a61835a1
10308 F20101208_AABAGK pasch_j_Page_011.QC.jpg
6ee37644a1962353ba439643b8b49347
06e10979a2bd659d81fd8ccaffe2126452284d89
3524 F20101208_AABAFV pasch_j_Page_004thm.jpg
f844c7bcc024b225746f30823527cde8
930871e5c61d5d28d9ab5b51ece1a5fe0f7e7802
109082 F20101208_AAAZJH pasch_j_Page_182.jp2
a22188c0977943050c7ec456baa21e78
573a8113d71a18db661e62d6af6cc0f302c94baa
99781 F20101208_AAAZIT pasch_j_Page_168.jp2
e6d7aa7dc9ace0041bac5a1be0d97a6d
55e29e9c9c99f0e98a767ac6b7bf8a5cdf73b60c
3655 F20101208_AABAGL pasch_j_Page_012thm.jpg
f91d61fa0a299f252eb413568a645c4f
429d55b1781853c95e4f412f0a0e4d8c6ebe6fc9
13480 F20101208_AABAFW pasch_j_Page_004.QC.jpg
52d3a2d0f3c6719f92b25a8b639592c8
e966ad0bf100f1d5da679f76f1d9d08afed54dbf
10439 F20101208_AAAZJI pasch_j_Page_183.jp2
e9c20feaf5fc858cd762fe275e95b030
9e877c8603e48f79042796fcde644e3d1273ee75
114344 F20101208_AAAZIU pasch_j_Page_169.jp2
2563a9e20fb33e26326ffa82c78ee446
28d6a63cb91ec9a1da022d1e7502e9a3b4b569dd
33104 F20101208_AABAHA pasch_j_Page_019.QC.jpg
5d7498409a4a75ede930c9beaaf06b17
6fe4d8cde6c6f438ea5b6fc726418932fb41f9ac
12172 F20101208_AABAGM pasch_j_Page_012.QC.jpg
4a4c045e5d06b2c74d4ece09e7104eb9
dbd7b4befbe6201387d53825a42d113a216e0cd7
6349 F20101208_AABAFX pasch_j_Page_005thm.jpg
62ea46c2a2cbfcec55f605e2c4f1d63b
4f346597253aea374347eaed18933b29f1572572
120447 F20101208_AAAZJJ pasch_j_Page_184.jp2
4abd7ba5d99b731a7b607d518f241bd0
b2d806c0ff43bbbfecd947d0c92fca7d2846d5e6
116563 F20101208_AAAZIV pasch_j_Page_170.jp2
d0a7e3f69680811bd04acacaf14672eb
4b56075505995fabb4a67c212de034ffabc02eeb
6513 F20101208_AABAHB pasch_j_Page_020thm.jpg
cd00e5df13531d22eab9a9b8d75f76b2
74f7b67669b76b968635a953696c0d60cb0b24af
3573 F20101208_AABAGN pasch_j_Page_013thm.jpg
31bcb2ff96a9ec8ed2606c0493fb1e1e
322159f443a475ab2a57c8e09dad77b9678c3efa
25613 F20101208_AABAFY pasch_j_Page_005.QC.jpg
17d939798d51517c62ea1c187243e3a5
225b421ba83abc876244d0bd9e506b8a7ffcd4e1
124237 F20101208_AAAZJK pasch_j_Page_185.jp2
b89e550a0cb0c1618b6a09a38621c683
0ece42daa37ee3deb30e97bb06382e99590e5bf6
108659 F20101208_AAAZIW pasch_j_Page_171.jp2
df6c37565608ce8478512c2f334ae512
5f85749a81b215986e4d4db48afe3ce27c5bbde4
25282 F20101208_AABAHC pasch_j_Page_020.QC.jpg
488078e1bb1d1ea71f44e46a9b24aa74
a60df2a47d257dabbaaf812b3243d03f08067249
11496 F20101208_AABAGO pasch_j_Page_013.QC.jpg
a8865366a443a5bfb0bbacb362e1bd27
36a89cced7487924a8cd15c07ca97baf0ca1ca00
7280 F20101208_AABAFZ pasch_j_Page_006thm.jpg
bb156d24c35e182b0850f9007eb1099a
521cf0061b59521001d16c0c6f72cab51f6fd390
137190 F20101208_AAAZJL pasch_j_Page_186.jp2
c2b17935d98a3be03633523262226ed8
22920c4951d0cc9b04342f171b135c5e5a4a8692
110571 F20101208_AAAZIX pasch_j_Page_172.jp2
7f5f11206629380b2b9f2e6f70d4c322
53a842a6346cd77d48cea67ed485b9cae36326f9
7814 F20101208_AABAHD pasch_j_Page_021thm.jpg
fb004bce0f5ba4cae2ef69f027871358
8353da18d87aae92a2889950544fed62e00bb2fe
2772 F20101208_AABAGP pasch_j_Page_014thm.jpg
13338e681e353d61c49c5693cb85d508
0e74152b2ca260dcfd6ed56002be10837d0a3bae
25271604 F20101208_AAAZKA pasch_j_Page_011.tif
4b9777cb9c090db1bd2f93197ec1182b
729317174f446fdd76737932dbc22346f215af9a
141375 F20101208_AAAZJM pasch_j_Page_187.jp2
5eb869b23fdf207ea28d5f8c40b0ae92
fcfea835ace1831b449b9cbcd531c9e22d26a2ba
109770 F20101208_AAAZIY pasch_j_Page_173.jp2
d4fcf8e88c7c41ab4e94e03173bd690d
b6749053ac136de6b15ee32a81e647ee00b3dea7
30086 F20101208_AABAHE pasch_j_Page_021.QC.jpg
75953216d47003b8882bb534e246a13b
6b477b1dc4d11e3bf637082285f12ae3783a2f1e
8559 F20101208_AABAGQ pasch_j_Page_014.QC.jpg
605e069c2e6e0e58e59c79958d2f64e3
66643b663e8861051922d7494a7888c09a5f9424
1053954 F20101208_AAAZKB pasch_j_Page_012.tif
cd5f94f27924543ec855633ce7b839a3
8e16c464db5f1d3870aeaa86ee49db86e95b3974
131599 F20101208_AAAZJN pasch_j_Page_188.jp2
d73b9c6243d44369e27c7a9abc4527f1
67611fcbb49a851c07800671cca10ec79401bfa9
106330 F20101208_AAAZIZ pasch_j_Page_174.jp2
e9eea8e9d815e9bfd1b3c62538e393df
04bc0daab330f6e508902b52e5f5c3995df36ece
7654 F20101208_AABAHF pasch_j_Page_022thm.jpg
c227c123c6efbf4283815a6d2f55fed3
658767642361ae110e1fa1a204041c27f9e72d2a
3105 F20101208_AABAGR pasch_j_Page_015thm.jpg
a20b3acf8e9e639a9dac96122b402b4a
6677b1009e188b5975ce70f003973fe414ced474
F20101208_AAAZKC pasch_j_Page_013.tif
a523a97bc088a74b662c64f8ad6ec131
b1d09d04cf0368fa69b6f0a1606098a5a889802a
129523 F20101208_AAAZJO pasch_j_Page_189.jp2
ff7bd052981eca7d98d2957c5fa30e0f
63dc7630c92ae9eaaa0ada1378d247c0715c4e90
30862 F20101208_AABAHG pasch_j_Page_022.QC.jpg
af9214361b2b5f25e7756ca286d11cf3
b525935cbc3c8d12878feaf955d517614b7f269c
10046 F20101208_AABAGS pasch_j_Page_015.QC.jpg
4e27c7992eb753baaf440b4867b05bd8
d85d5f4cfdd377e3c0685fedb34785aa9279a635
F20101208_AAAZKD pasch_j_Page_014.tif
ee57462968cec2e580c106d34b64ba41
14ce219e866fb3eb57499bc122d4e47b500d1503
48757 F20101208_AAAZJP pasch_j_Page_190.jp2
a63671f771c3706546b620f51bb142ca
56cc50c23aa383283041650f1ceb0a4d6746db19
7887 F20101208_AABAHH pasch_j_Page_023thm.jpg
d6d9463cc55cbe21f91b49e22f42ae38
deabb9db11009b88ce6cb089d14ec521649e09c2
7534 F20101208_AABAGT pasch_j_Page_016thm.jpg
f9caad9b8162f1db676c6e75131d3d43
fa0fa7288202d8e97f6be19dc529eeb82626cdd9
F20101208_AAAZKE pasch_j_Page_015.tif
bf20275cf2ca7fccab4f8258bbec25ad
1698a996e1a6c960b8109faba765733f380dad59
F20101208_AAAZJQ pasch_j_Page_001.tif
28799bcbba75bf5fa7cc624f721ad475
337b3b8f63e517304f41e92738bcafa1c44c9eb2
31490 F20101208_AABAHI pasch_j_Page_023.QC.jpg
cf50cfafd4486669929069d2b3d7b626
2c2d6c7b04729d1f833fc8c2bd0562597bb1b988
F20101208_AAAZKF pasch_j_Page_016.tif
2208125f88a24b9c26d420b58379a7a7
957138db81719399c643f37798b34c509e0403f4
F20101208_AAAZJR pasch_j_Page_002.tif
92614c7dd236f702a617da257f983429
6c00ffb149d463c05292c877be255cda7f536a3f
5424 F20101208_AABAHJ pasch_j_Page_024thm.jpg
4007a708bba13edc2f2575e90209f660
ca1263330ed4df91ef4492584fbe92bf87869e7d
28934 F20101208_AABAGU pasch_j_Page_016.QC.jpg
5b8284f2a28c2d6b269a0714ef38b1d6
d8acdeb9957c5985dfe67a30d0e50d2e7d76a1df
F20101208_AAAZKG pasch_j_Page_017.tif
c1b000af96c7e95a545d98eb42d1b83d
c66e154b933a3540c1c42229f579ca37092e1725
F20101208_AAAZJS pasch_j_Page_003.tif
9bc5a0eb732baa9643039994633501e7
d2a4db343030e0cd6d989a8c6312f6cad55e9eb6
20286 F20101208_AABAHK pasch_j_Page_024.QC.jpg
39efa4155066c98801ecf20043e881d3
c3cc90d0885bce12a0d7bb2ba9c9a7a2ec5de99b
4100 F20101208_AABAGV pasch_j_Page_017thm.jpg
0db0c9732e18d5c552fce78ba7c52c15
e5fa2c7d01f4d614e6a94a002e86b0cc264372df
F20101208_AAAZKH pasch_j_Page_018.tif
877e5b1caf152bdd709b5818e4342195
e270e6c3b830cd2fc5b0340712c18267bb0e7c50
F20101208_AAAZJT pasch_j_Page_004.tif
14642c705fa5ee01333d81604ff80bd7
1de07c22386da24f10820c33aa73c73a35d9e490
5206 F20101208_AABAHL pasch_j_Page_025thm.jpg
7fcb72382dcb00e0a0eaaa5232a8dba8
a36fd974ef7a0ebcc6647245df6605ff856679ee
15734 F20101208_AABAGW pasch_j_Page_017.QC.jpg
2a7de54665793c5048db0633180a5db5
181d9ebfd3e2d3d29f062e2cce0b93141a87bbac
F20101208_AAAZKI pasch_j_Page_019.tif
7b7ac05d0e635f078fc76a4a2c6b02e3
b8696af07d854c73e4a117eee10c7d3580be2636
F20101208_AAAZJU pasch_j_Page_005.tif
b54b0827be6ed24a990b677b2d8690d8
0f0e87702be316da50369c8437c38d3580843d9b
9193 F20101208_AABAIA pasch_j_Page_033thm.jpg
313766fd82a31015734e139b8d8b3f1b
cdfea771a23f8850b99d0c688be902e3f4896dc2
18707 F20101208_AABAHM pasch_j_Page_025.QC.jpg
d3dea8fd743e25419f4288039dfd67dc
db7c8315942190789363d7743ecf7e78af323704
8505 F20101208_AABAGX pasch_j_Page_018thm.jpg
0c62236462c0a7a2555d960faadd81b3
2839e1147c3c01db1b4bfefc54abe938172b6582
F20101208_AAAZKJ pasch_j_Page_020.tif
2e7dedf0347cbd1240f034ac5a655d05
cb5e63449fe835edb07a15da8297971d5a3c6707
F20101208_AAAZJV pasch_j_Page_006.tif
7c3c28b1b9bd492e8396cb234bffa0b2
44203c8f0f7f93638416783d012e0d20327a489b
37306 F20101208_AABAIB pasch_j_Page_033.QC.jpg
5b72032396dff9d862d0eea76de34850
6e39bd1a47e86fde27b424b7aa8a95caa54a96a8
6139 F20101208_AABAHN pasch_j_Page_026thm.jpg
4dd1a7badea6c6ad70633c6911da272c
c9e1afd33b5cd407ff2b1f63f81859fc04d2ff7c
34860 F20101208_AABAGY pasch_j_Page_018.QC.jpg
cebe430ec25e6ac4c8b209e475c7799d
ec62302211da5867bcb0666af7f3f0dfaa287e20
F20101208_AAAZKK pasch_j_Page_021.tif
92bafefe90a87a6f66056601e42b44cc
306708716241b1b7198a15df844a5a6946e65f92
F20101208_AAAZJW pasch_j_Page_007.tif
66efbbc99561de9abf98de42ae9748ec
a64338cb80c08b864348a33349a5bc7692425fde
8885 F20101208_AABAIC pasch_j_Page_034thm.jpg
e9feba7cfcf30e27617da7da42e4c1f8
ffd37745c4c472bda0d7302472dc534874c5d7ee
24295 F20101208_AABAHO pasch_j_Page_026.QC.jpg
f94182864a7e6acb1125d85ead877bbc
247d373ab9ef39585ba645886bd239a1a09dc0d4
8012 F20101208_AABAGZ pasch_j_Page_019thm.jpg
a5c2e4d1d4b8c029a2c66a823841abce
01d074eb9e76f3affd8fb38ed4588f84a72746fb
F20101208_AAAZKL pasch_j_Page_022.tif
5e0ba87b677a3b832a939789d738d2f5
6ea5affe8e00604d4bc5f09e832b83f03ee5878f
F20101208_AAAZJX pasch_j_Page_008.tif
0227ca5931cd6308c438312885f5d0dc
f18b876cb8c4161e288d47ca0457ce41c4bfda46
35200 F20101208_AABAID pasch_j_Page_034.QC.jpg
1ebeca299a5f21b418bb7d730abe748a
3619bdcc02ca469bd16b4ecad232125fa04a8fb8
7437 F20101208_AABAHP pasch_j_Page_027thm.jpg
76743ce79d62160a99508f51c872c1e7
606e464b0f697ffa11fbc501192bc60ebd0a1703
F20101208_AAAZKM pasch_j_Page_023.tif
333a1bc9e2aad936d354e95a2b5c83be
419ce016bb67412c3e92fc2c09e754164042a989
F20101208_AAAZJY pasch_j_Page_009.tif
1f154caa2e95dd733d03707ab479b8a9
983208e9bb3fb5f007ec6cb542f35d03b8f8fa49
F20101208_AAAZLA pasch_j_Page_037.tif
868330eb319506263bef4d0cbf2ec65b
c00fd14fbf952c8a1089bd4aaa848dcc8f2705e6
7652 F20101208_AABAIE pasch_j_Page_035thm.jpg
aa9b68e4b334472c148443f929f2fba4
73d5aabd14505e0ee790bee5b3df50540041266c
27899 F20101208_AABAHQ pasch_j_Page_027.QC.jpg
d00b4488b48e2862d04819358fd1c360
169a9f3c0b8232aac4286318ff38eb4c0543ceaa
F20101208_AAAZKN pasch_j_Page_024.tif
3bf5606c39818d2bc9c9eb6b276d8e97
b33fcac3c28b1f609a3dcebd25d51af8ed90532d
F20101208_AAAZJZ pasch_j_Page_010.tif
4c45da4e9b9a8e52126f76c2fc9d6fdc
643db9ef3ce900bc0bcb1cb7861ddcd447133d15
F20101208_AAAZLB pasch_j_Page_038.tif
0855a129ffe7b1b13271e79c7e8cb499
4810314f00e945b7dea7af82ac52e491b0b943bd
31177 F20101208_AABAIF pasch_j_Page_035.QC.jpg
c107c9bbf3907523382f5f3772e29088
0a857918b331caae75556991f1380418cf17c609
7606 F20101208_AABAHR pasch_j_Page_028thm.jpg
c6cc53f7af461965b0c0fbf0e0f33973
2e6b40efad637fa8f1912b5aff78af7322cb9b39
F20101208_AAAZKO pasch_j_Page_025.tif
4fb686ce3e0e7615b6b006593e023691
b57f82c57eece399779901e623ce837a1153646b
F20101208_AAAZLC pasch_j_Page_039.tif
314e8971c6139c8547678ce2ed852b75
da09a19e02f840412996d81bae081d751045d9ef
3507 F20101208_AABAIG pasch_j_Page_036thm.jpg
0b227c825b16ae2ac7eb40eeb26903c5
396ab43b025410db5060b732463515fbb66b00e5
29844 F20101208_AABAHS pasch_j_Page_028.QC.jpg
4dfe0b7250df0b6c53dde7b76f764d2c
c0bf538d6c115e8cc0ae1edfc77aaa544318cb7c
F20101208_AAAZKP pasch_j_Page_026.tif
6381402feadee993bc47964786b34327
3d5e987069329410be507c3ed662de503f120d52
F20101208_AAAZLD pasch_j_Page_040.tif
68ef4d00fc0899407e8fd6c47a3b2f04
567ad8096ac710b6f575e257ed4251cef75b93c0
14366 F20101208_AABAIH pasch_j_Page_036.QC.jpg
d9b8b28ab326c7afacb3c64a8351ca9f
efefbef3433df66f5e9dc041f40ede96a6c2942e
6029 F20101208_AABAHT pasch_j_Page_029thm.jpg
c589c40f6acff523765b74b7c4654123
f275fd5d533dcfbc91e3f0c6606554b8457cc5cc
F20101208_AAAZKQ pasch_j_Page_027.tif
ce92b57f78456eaeadfa98e6eefe6219
f79fe4f12ce63ecb2e8b2a586a22640cb796c0cb
F20101208_AAAZLE pasch_j_Page_041.tif
2429d5999d37fae954b7907b242828d8
7f61e197219e9a6dab360e1857dfb7c340f4a752
2987 F20101208_AABAII pasch_j_Page_037thm.jpg
d9c884b05174dfbd4cc2e82e396a8c85
c439dfd6bbde68c626b4be9b2b8d12d3de1c6d19
21947 F20101208_AABAHU pasch_j_Page_029.QC.jpg
2dd463db7ce0fb0a16d02cafda23f4d3
ca6b2fa34da23d7294934170d652414309bf2ed4
F20101208_AAAZKR pasch_j_Page_028.tif
1430729ff0b91f05f11da76148698182
e4985bae372c73faaa0087069ff9fbf602dab340
F20101208_AAAZLF pasch_j_Page_042.tif
91edcecf036315b1a4b9b249cff3b8f2
e5646c735f558ba45e9b53f9958e7259ee951d98
9740 F20101208_AABAIJ pasch_j_Page_037.QC.jpg
aa4460458a31f4014b230c94f38ef7e9
25db4f83e863ace98d64e033056e9999203e4987
F20101208_AAAZKS pasch_j_Page_029.tif
424f254e8f9b6ac665ffadd47832abdb
8c7b3dab18aa8183eeab125b70074c8720d83c78
F20101208_AAAZLG pasch_j_Page_043.tif
3a9ace91294318471a3a46c7131fa58e
f07e09a26e9dbc6dc2de3b7c850257be4a495f53
8334 F20101208_AABAIK pasch_j_Page_038thm.jpg
6bc9103c6b07d240d41188240a2e66ce
5ed8c11c9a4411c41e62adf5e129a5f53238cd33
6902 F20101208_AABAHV pasch_j_Page_030thm.jpg
1459ff9d42f7cbfa1b233581a9477cb2
ab3814bb4802fd684fde4ae06fc450edfe8592ec
F20101208_AAAZKT pasch_j_Page_030.tif
3385ea34e89ca874ca17bf00624b4edf
b6bfb7e2a1f7299842acc788bccc2544381081e8
F20101208_AAAZLH pasch_j_Page_044.tif
baa81ef32e96831ecd906ed5e61b8719
0c643b6144e0249fef06af6a80a0e44015410415
34125 F20101208_AABAIL pasch_j_Page_038.QC.jpg
20d382911d46fb3de008c220bfbae8d3
003d7912a5fe0878548c761b348f691406a6072d
26867 F20101208_AABAHW pasch_j_Page_030.QC.jpg
9f369a2f35858b8b6408837871c7f8e4
8f290b9a4f3bcf9662307604f9c161c664f24fd9
F20101208_AAAZKU pasch_j_Page_031.tif
34e0d9f4d81932556c9d6532c192bd4c
c58ef3eeba3109cd10e7271b7c5e78b639938fb9
F20101208_AAAZLI pasch_j_Page_045.tif
4673ffdeb59987851badf32bdf05deb8
470539b9fd09b96a20884ae5ac0a4c15f2f68e3a
7655 F20101208_AABAJA pasch_j_Page_046thm.jpg
4ae56075e7991682d18442a54d946347
5b44b3a27e7e473a68b8475e5dbc9e451fb25bab
8918 F20101208_AABAIM pasch_j_Page_039thm.jpg
1db1545fd92247b8299932723bfc209e
07a3cfc258971f0f02acec6ea649354cbce64d06
7793 F20101208_AABAHX pasch_j_Page_031thm.jpg
51e77c267614e6feaa277a7ef5643c7a
47ca236665e5c910ade6642bd659a08844d55fb0
F20101208_AAAZKV pasch_j_Page_032.tif
5b29a97087254ee03c4eaa1b7f07cc25
df6b67a4aa8305425cecfb90db356cb778ae0c4b
F20101208_AAAZLJ pasch_j_Page_046.tif
1928e1a58572bed55952c1dddde1a5a3
5259ce2c67836cee178045c6f86a1beeb0192936
30462 F20101208_AABAJB pasch_j_Page_046.QC.jpg
c352faf4d4ba637abc44ed53cd36e41d
fbc9f55068d11aa7dfba879c5b5887f4ef5e290c
35350 F20101208_AABAIN pasch_j_Page_039.QC.jpg
90492af59c963f7db886c14efd48b2f0
32470c46ba7ff43b17669ae17e4a1bf0ed245c5b
8896 F20101208_AABAHY pasch_j_Page_032thm.jpg
440b5f63d5b32625ded97fa406f3f291
4812a29fc643aeeb3f7528c1fc12e0b73b154b3f
F20101208_AAAZKW pasch_j_Page_033.tif
206660f6c09365a963d439647dfb2659
106b393e932fa90fc93da841b339514845336812
F20101208_AAAZLK pasch_j_Page_047.tif
25b7d6b6336e9f6655d969cf14f128db
3f811a3b0541438ce87ac6a85e080c25636a4e00
8941 F20101208_AABAJC pasch_j_Page_047thm.jpg
1329bace4960e7e1cb44744c215ce7d5
180b946fb848d56ed5b8182038a14e147b52fcc6
8850 F20101208_AABAIO pasch_j_Page_040thm.jpg
3301c36b46c4317191a654883756d2b5
2f156f942006c36470b638c4b9e573d0d9531ce0
35856 F20101208_AABAHZ pasch_j_Page_032.QC.jpg
59358d5e2390ff190adcda4cd58570f9
acc535935c971a14efb8fd8f5f4d0e34a767bf77
F20101208_AAAZKX pasch_j_Page_034.tif
f4c17dbd98935f242d7605a975e42fbf
029479ed294e55c03b430a4a45736c4bb41f3d89
F20101208_AAAZLL pasch_j_Page_048.tif
ed8fcd5d8cfa4f37aa26410dd82ce796
6a9fd9d81c68191dfd5ea136076913ee797b3984
35314 F20101208_AABAJD pasch_j_Page_047.QC.jpg
13c3f3b9cfa239c2d0d9dac26c7cc23c
ded0e25d0e3dba646dce37681b480500841dd7e5
35654 F20101208_AABAIP pasch_j_Page_040.QC.jpg
424a823bac14526ecb3d6ebc6c1a2b4e
125049339590f810eab47714e5d24bc8ec2cf249
F20101208_AAAZKY pasch_j_Page_035.tif
6ea03a58c0fb12fa3cc2796646316968
0ff1f4ec17976a8b05397ce2f863161eac08c339
F20101208_AAAZMA pasch_j_Page_063.tif
e9581011dc5bc4e29c5d166e2a17ba9d
ad9aeb682462cc7fa7661272f62d42c21e0ee537
F20101208_AAAZLM pasch_j_Page_049.tif
66f952bc85ff30de809e1e5b63c47ee6
2c433f2a8e7a7421b452e6c992eba3247dcd666a
8082 F20101208_AABAJE pasch_j_Page_048thm.jpg
e6aa4ed04e07327f450f76aecfae29ca
bbaee3c9ed8289a6933c23d0914cfd68a32c377e
9297 F20101208_AABAIQ pasch_j_Page_041thm.jpg
0d1d65d0cd7d5cd977cff70eb847e12b
0d39947f5e3370770bd37302a7d5950171adbb2c
F20101208_AAAZKZ pasch_j_Page_036.tif
1e5b981d165e6205be94a0faf67b35bc
ee35a477667aa2b4744cbcf3698f1d344a86d5a2
F20101208_AAAZMB pasch_j_Page_064.tif
d514db54c2716a0d29b84855dc79d0a8
90916c0d0396b0752a6bb5048fc256b638161980
F20101208_AAAZLN pasch_j_Page_050.tif
f801504924bd458279b89d4397420bf7
3a1b8dd0e2216a6fd78327ee5bd5f76300873cfe
32792 F20101208_AABAJF pasch_j_Page_048.QC.jpg
6c4ddbd38892358f1c8a4ab3ba523468
7d9dbfaa11b1716dec2413833f422407f1a2e31f
37293 F20101208_AABAIR pasch_j_Page_041.QC.jpg
1fbdc642b2a77136cc30e6fa7365dd5a
2b9e860287e98067a0326b006d202050413463dd
F20101208_AAAZMC pasch_j_Page_065.tif
183bed946a507405a5fcd698f60a1be4
7b8dae15c537b5d016acc3609c0d4c7b156f07f9
F20101208_AAAZLO pasch_j_Page_051.tif
c1b0de60b9c833bc004617f43e5c2700
81fa0d279d5497342d35e36d6ab022e38fbcdbeb
8570 F20101208_AABAJG pasch_j_Page_049thm.jpg
0c065b6c931306228bcaebeb1dfa4a21
910eaeb3dddef555e2eb660470a034e63cd48485
5691 F20101208_AABAIS pasch_j_Page_042thm.jpg
3802ca6c5f5b4143249406aa68316f16
6046fd4c5f08374f20bef870b69849642e4b3252
F20101208_AAAZMD pasch_j_Page_066.tif
e88ab05bf088dfe285e9966029e26060
fd1cb9419e9c89ce8c036436dd21afa289481ba9
F20101208_AAAZLP pasch_j_Page_052.tif
00315c586fad713ddee94f7109db74b8
0734623097fe0cddcec0f99215000a452270d768
36549 F20101208_AABAJH pasch_j_Page_049.QC.jpg
d9ec7ecf44ba3587582e0a3418850c01
51a21ad7a2694350c6f62e99b99684e076772bd2
22950 F20101208_AABAIT pasch_j_Page_042.QC.jpg
47bb3adc56ab6fdc6ddd25cc44b00a5b
34ffeccc88759d4e759ada709ad58d69e5ed9243
F20101208_AAAZME pasch_j_Page_067.tif
b0a94667ca31497b0e2434565de66133
28331425e60d6639b1648f8f0f9ea2dd3ce74ba7
F20101208_AAAZLQ pasch_j_Page_053.tif
68714470da3451c47d96e73f9fdeb426
680d4ed9a4d46b5589dd7ef0b6e3cfdd3d5db7d1
8870 F20101208_AABAJI pasch_j_Page_050thm.jpg
ccc9735be057c607ffe8c926b5b38502
ae8cd58b072995ff025b93e046d31e3877263ca4
4821 F20101208_AABAIU pasch_j_Page_043thm.jpg
245e92965de7450804c8d029deafa207
a1a510f059da02d2851cef12d0eb63f43229408f
F20101208_AAAZMF pasch_j_Page_068.tif
c45d9abb4d3f3e63e005c58a04d99ce0
2c3901c203a3463ac90a9150b54b9634dce59a8a
F20101208_AAAZLR pasch_j_Page_054.tif
1c6302e31f8218ce083fbe124728ea07
ae6a8affa564616ebfdc44a3173296b70824b816
35486 F20101208_AABAJJ pasch_j_Page_050.QC.jpg
c6d301dff349a18bf2b26d6d7d0833a2
f36da55cd93337ac248eabf67a5eb1fcd18a5233
16114 F20101208_AABAIV pasch_j_Page_043.QC.jpg
d423c12e3903da68d238421b17c10294
c1fcfc61ae30b4166784ccbb0669bb66e2514d06
F20101208_AAAZMG pasch_j_Page_069.tif
4fb589eeb16646ebbcf7bb6236694b76
a656024f5f50192322b7f2a24bbe38e6b47420a8
F20101208_AAAZLS pasch_j_Page_055.tif
1d76321aeb3cea9733e8d8d3d5d010cf
f2e8f32448044c9f9379dd3b8e0e9a4dd5f77e7b
9032 F20101208_AABAJK pasch_j_Page_051thm.jpg
e02023f5779771dfa9d94be8e36dedc9
e50eb571cc7d94ad5bee4497eb7a8b509751e149
F20101208_AAAZMH pasch_j_Page_070.tif
05d8ab2a46cc2b82b830313b8e6778b6
7e5f9debffdda3a7af22dc8717a1c9093837a71f
F20101208_AAAZLT pasch_j_Page_056.tif
2cbc23f1940073f8be61782d5b3290dd
ed71638809d4f5481032bc6905dd6f6290e2b5b7
36095 F20101208_AABAJL pasch_j_Page_051.QC.jpg
c124cc06f5fc4f05e699d82cccca2216
c41ec52b98b9d195330e9b10e4791f00cd82368d
8444 F20101208_AABAIW pasch_j_Page_044thm.jpg
150f53a36fe2d47f55a31f31dc0ca37a
8271442f9af2b6177e3cf8f2f0b7b0052a597c3b
F20101208_AAAZMI pasch_j_Page_071.tif
85ff67ec7177820c655ad11d4712f061
3f86a3f79c65bdc70a4b3609ad13d2d0b172f970
F20101208_AAAZLU pasch_j_Page_057.tif
215e0f4486e46643475f89c0e93fe8d3
93157ddd6f92994f802915190f45d78945aaa04d
F20101208_AABAKA pasch_j_Page_059thm.jpg
6c25b30b2a6a218cf574aee78205c04a
657024cb2c077bf0504b9296313efc23d7e4ab8e
7861 F20101208_AABAJM pasch_j_Page_052thm.jpg
a2606fab2b08c5545e485d6294e181d7
d20658a058152db2bd5e194732f54176272448f3
34444 F20101208_AABAIX pasch_j_Page_044.QC.jpg
58e21e96294288e2c08b61ff16069d73
0b5ab3e2170b672db82c50942e744482d7609597
F20101208_AAAZMJ pasch_j_Page_072.tif
de992ac603ccde664954cae9d4dba895
5a0ba538d53e20eaee94930b0bf6e6b197f3db7b
F20101208_AAAZLV pasch_j_Page_058.tif
6bc27e5bbc30260ae0a80fe989aa4c01
c8abafea070382da467d11bc146456d048d15959
34702 F20101208_AABAKB pasch_j_Page_059.QC.jpg
f583dd551a5d99c6808ac6b4067c7304
1275c79adb48d6d8a61df5cf31070138c85a15e2
32855 F20101208_AABAJN pasch_j_Page_052.QC.jpg
04e99a3c679d0c35f33788661abfcd9f
f8aaf53fd05fb7d1a8ba5161510eba5e226dd2c8
8507 F20101208_AABAIY pasch_j_Page_045thm.jpg
53012443b9bd5e4b25f29227a2877324
4f3cfd2c9e782036bf2d9315deb5d90d4c3d5ee0
F20101208_AAAZMK pasch_j_Page_073.tif
0a2066a2eb10d6301a1695d10833d66b
4bc5b8836ec07ad41b74dad6a767a80cbf7aace9
F20101208_AAAZLW pasch_j_Page_059.tif
2114ce0bc2dd987d258c370bf16e342e
570bc7fc17ad59c660e8bca1b0e8d139afb1ceb1
8210 F20101208_AABAKC pasch_j_Page_060thm.jpg
1d2be9280811b4fbbfca51e8535f7f7c
c788adfc0355fc87be225a60b18ace87edb07058
8623 F20101208_AABAJO pasch_j_Page_053thm.jpg
405027ecdd8fb53a013bed66237d2b59
0504e7e78e98838d6b425a4fe8dc28d38137599a
34948 F20101208_AABAIZ pasch_j_Page_045.QC.jpg
9469bc7c3fca8f07fa055108499616d4
a33314b051dae709d3bc06216eb168fec99da593
F20101208_AAAZNA pasch_j_Page_089.tif
57ae97829cf3ed985d1127f71094a6b9
9b9d24b16fe2c00ad32a5499d8ea4d13fe9c988b
F20101208_AAAZML pasch_j_Page_074.tif
5b139df0c53b995865a3b92f27a5e7a0
36ba0a5f397b2d5735afff2738761b870d1296a0
F20101208_AAAZLX pasch_j_Page_060.tif
bca55416b278770ad3ae170ccd065c74
cfbf1e53e08b8c3a4e884f52e36c3de806db6857
34804 F20101208_AABAKD pasch_j_Page_060.QC.jpg
555ff983529bcf6e2a5cd5897f4e7d36
08bafa6f7d7be2c9ba7f0b30137315883763959d
34777 F20101208_AABAJP pasch_j_Page_053.QC.jpg
a486840230f7a4c97b043e6f478089d9
c276f3918bf2890ef6ef0cf7273b811fc699cf56
F20101208_AAAZMM pasch_j_Page_075.tif
59953aa21a510d00c275d7a9fdf165a1
d5b740b96a0de44139b802acc110f4b33297b974
F20101208_AAAZLY pasch_j_Page_061.tif
f4a6002373faa4f83c08b9f613bbf179
5aeea2e0124dde40f7b66adc72fbc4f15e4fa9ef
9082 F20101208_AABAKE pasch_j_Page_061thm.jpg
c5f121a942043f5cc1222b75abd91da4
3677cf7ffd7f55e81d06105637858f06cfd6cedb
9027 F20101208_AABAJQ pasch_j_Page_054thm.jpg
b05dc9b9e1abbb2422e208e290c236eb
372506300ab270db6d445ca40b71c6395285ebf3
F20101208_AAAZNB pasch_j_Page_090.tif
a4de52405729f4ba6ec5c64a5e7ca528
f6ccbcd32a63ffda4edfe7661e9926221b1108be
F20101208_AAAZMN pasch_j_Page_076.tif
ae65cedf1ad3bc55d8883b04bdbed8ab
4b88edbafe010124e4b09feac5b246c236feaa82
F20101208_AAAZLZ pasch_j_Page_062.tif
0e71f3c59987e478152287c6d0fb3884
e0eb44947a8148ee9991b2823e8a900602136e93
37025 F20101208_AABAKF pasch_j_Page_061.QC.jpg
a1bd2b47bcdcfcde42b8fe2a5b711e91
8117755ee9eb0c8144cf92cc627f0d6effff7b28
35336 F20101208_AABAJR pasch_j_Page_054.QC.jpg
9c78fe08c3afe3f59b297f1bbcaceaf3
04735053952b19c774361b243054e7c186238e89
F20101208_AAAZNC pasch_j_Page_091.tif
d7f9ca45479923cdf57fb0bcc779778e
2d93035f4a1875abde77d3a66f33267a624acd88
F20101208_AAAZMO pasch_j_Page_077.tif
07c1f813978a3a56ee9b5b1297e298e2
0ea6c3dc903dbf17cce6200ff1b9afbd09489088
8733 F20101208_AABAKG pasch_j_Page_062thm.jpg
c9b8736388ae20eb3c487e2d59649a37
62106bd1c1f83ab4e0d7bcc12d83bb2d52bbe529
9050 F20101208_AABAJS pasch_j_Page_055thm.jpg
643c69d2ba46ab4e1ed83d764b5c5fca
246a34f1ada30bda89434624139425b5b0716f80
F20101208_AAAZND pasch_j_Page_092.tif
b4dadf1fc342c57adf0ed2c25cf3a0de
8a998b48061705bace356998a9ebf3f5e2527f2c
F20101208_AAAZMP pasch_j_Page_078.tif
7cc80856f0e0eded324ff0fdba8597e4
5c241ae4e77da645bfb0b0b3af1bea94e68cc9ac
34619 F20101208_AABAKH pasch_j_Page_062.QC.jpg
2b50a723f4ee57c5d65347ee32d81d63
f081e8648094c09b762851c27b205b0b557f6ac8
39191 F20101208_AABAJT pasch_j_Page_055.QC.jpg
8873f5cc2bdb4aa33bc9361fe0bc5f82
cd52748b948e7f0f54471bb86e46ab60fe75adac
F20101208_AAAZNE pasch_j_Page_093.tif
b034268a135bf027a8f476d1e8368974
30ec5f992aa215e5dbc2a2c5d3765107a19149bb
F20101208_AAAZMQ pasch_j_Page_079.tif
1860433de70d4009c33f353edd0406ac
0b99b02ad30d86cbf3503039462d346f43fd125e
7496 F20101208_AABAKI pasch_j_Page_063thm.jpg
c31d2d0ae69d1ae9ccb99eb981b2fc94
2cb830abe4dddd8c864c980f847645a7776adefb
8797 F20101208_AABAJU pasch_j_Page_056thm.jpg
1d692f3eb746fba68e875b9ab180bd6c
656e861160fd14448b49969d84f7eb162ee9e03d
F20101208_AAAZNF pasch_j_Page_094.tif
1caefefb176699eb86e5751228a6a50d
8d00df6fd261f279f98a8cf66794fbdf0fa051d3
F20101208_AAAZMR pasch_j_Page_080.tif
1404190d5ccaf594bdd2e32dc0aa848a
0f1686203507f65c0ffafc9a600977dd8ebf0895
29864 F20101208_AABAKJ pasch_j_Page_063.QC.jpg
d694c49ccda2f0ce61dedf69e6fdfdea
c61b2137916eeca994edf32cf7d3f638128bc02f
35342 F20101208_AABAJV pasch_j_Page_056.QC.jpg
6b43e1ad9d169178a4070b914d7a7181
ed03b3f284363d5bd5da1b883cc0d488c7a0a7e7
F20101208_AAAZNG pasch_j_Page_095.tif
c65bf835cb45b8306ecd99dfc9772036
c16e087d221a73f788f8dd8f6376a738f4e737c6
F20101208_AAAZMS pasch_j_Page_081.tif
307c1d43071d7985450a182aff608960
d48fbe5f30cef8fcc42540101eef1cd38efc15ef
7401 F20101208_AABAKK pasch_j_Page_064thm.jpg
00f1e3e2dca5a9216d00197c242a2ec5
c2b0343d8e34fc31f4421ee27b77e0fca98b3fe5
7574 F20101208_AABAJW pasch_j_Page_057thm.jpg
114e24053f98d52ce94636b67148c2ca
e76c29e5d0424bd34332f6485ec260d422a7cc9a
F20101208_AAAZNH pasch_j_Page_096.tif
0bf144e63c97bb972c319493cc64b6dc
b726c27c31d7dd2496d6d2f23a02751953d80551
F20101208_AAAZMT pasch_j_Page_082.tif
89aa0dbf732be7993b4609d7016b2e45
99d58dbcf7922755a55be0aed4dbef3d7ecdff85
27430 F20101208_AABAKL pasch_j_Page_064.QC.jpg
e1d332a44049cccf919a01d494e33c6a
0b3e9a8c206ace8b63783ea29f424f295bdd32d7
F20101208_AAAZNI pasch_j_Page_097.tif
e52aa4f49d94298ee79416acb147c45d
99c17927c855a633907edf2f211cca748702d57d
F20101208_AAAZMU pasch_j_Page_083.tif
b2b5b6dfefabe9f4cd78b07684caac49
5268fa5a379329d3be5a894dbd470f595fdf5eb4
8406 F20101208_AABALA pasch_j_Page_072thm.jpg
e985bc9790a7df4532709fe578ba9f98
ab6387668b0b8d175e5fb771a3ec1b8e208c3aa9
5768 F20101208_AABAKM pasch_j_Page_065thm.jpg
a6af433e446ae71bbda2623946868361
c4ad7e5efe4358e1fb25a1042706872f6f4ceb1f
29512 F20101208_AABAJX pasch_j_Page_057.QC.jpg
5dd5e67187a86d19543c718a999ae005
40564b8e6b23d305dba20cb796317bb4b834aab4
F20101208_AAAZNJ pasch_j_Page_098.tif
1804161ccb637862018bbe93604c9142
86727503f55ce94af9d3b9f05dc2310aa1c3da21
F20101208_AAAZMV pasch_j_Page_084.tif
af254e53f4b5e4e9371bf84862937215
dac3c20996365132553d39d1bcf814f595b2f802
31671 F20101208_AABALB pasch_j_Page_072.QC.jpg
9a375ac404d7f4ca089bd6518bf17270
ba903b85546c78a518872bb3175cd124626ee106
21383 F20101208_AABAKN pasch_j_Page_065.QC.jpg
678d9097e1464ce4c05ad139610c62bb
eb3479ff878bcac20f6c4c01d0b5356bded76a90
8933 F20101208_AABAJY pasch_j_Page_058thm.jpg
afaf47aab982d4bd88c0808feaabaf8d
8d9b8fc37f81d3b619e7f323951c7f82e66ec7c7
F20101208_AAAZNK pasch_j_Page_099.tif
181003df7533f754c2630978b390e405
2d5852b4b6fa758a584321524860f7438b716270
F20101208_AAAZMW pasch_j_Page_085.tif
e2212eea17b3001853438dd921eb711b
f2570498427eb26ab0cf6a0e00b2afb08a246a33
6535 F20101208_AABALC pasch_j_Page_073thm.jpg
5667cabc110881eb85203f2ee97bf4ef
76db81ee94350103c6f3fe352371f82f255afaa2
6875 F20101208_AABAKO pasch_j_Page_066thm.jpg
c5ce3353ef85a84d2721641611af44de
93fd2e7d2f2fb6ded1cc758345d9e6c95a71455f
37153 F20101208_AABAJZ pasch_j_Page_058.QC.jpg
c398508606544e7a65c0435f955fba6e
33265e6baf82a863e6d87ab5f32c15cee1d56df8
F20101208_AAAZNL pasch_j_Page_100.tif
19fdc91095d2d06ebfdaadb81e3ddf5e
5111c8de98be0061bb9c19a096f82fbcb18f4603
F20101208_AAAZMX pasch_j_Page_086.tif
0957067a942635dd7197098e571c596d
6fdd1428237d39566b33f4e969ce65bf59daab71
F20101208_AAAZOA pasch_j_Page_115.tif
981f75a7522344a47e3df661eb011be4
d3259d21100f67fd3458c9668e06d58816e9ab13
26280 F20101208_AABALD pasch_j_Page_073.QC.jpg
59dfd7ab3c9a50b1f2f73ebf10bbb8b5
953b887963b8a34d3c331e1943813695513b8e64
26700 F20101208_AABAKP pasch_j_Page_066.QC.jpg
f1100575ccb32fd90f93e3897083a31c
dbbdccc7bcbb489ce2372631c5820e096b208f3f
F20101208_AAAZNM pasch_j_Page_101.tif
dca7ab3b147dab94fa7a07236bf3d187
cc298d34687a5c79ece749bb36a70e747a30fd5a
F20101208_AAAZMY pasch_j_Page_087.tif
8aca62cd6739ee8af90c05f9420fa2ee
ce74d54a8e3aa0de40f33eae6deb068d568365aa
F20101208_AAAZOB pasch_j_Page_116.tif
21ee1f89c2fb12bbbf5d270b7b3d436e
9be1861f2f8bf75fcd45a14d0048b210c121e97e
6011 F20101208_AABALE pasch_j_Page_074thm.jpg
6002cfa2847598c309dbf8290eda41ff
5b469f161c3e9115e22fe1a1aee1330222259e73
8834 F20101208_AABAKQ pasch_j_Page_067thm.jpg
43b154c00cbc83754b3aec806e159f05
a647ef942905a791dcb12319d45a846eab97c513
F20101208_AAAZNN pasch_j_Page_102.tif
c16b6257b109dca8b03066eba66b0687
df8632c20eeeb9c0fc797f65dc33f7d1b3847844
8423998 F20101208_AAAZMZ pasch_j_Page_088.tif
fab731b28d8ee11e5c03feb842133975
8a79b7b3bd85379ab70e1ce7a222453d987c36d1
22361 F20101208_AABALF pasch_j_Page_074.QC.jpg
9bde27dca76a13c291ab323e58f7c6bb
e58a8fc9bcfeb348e47fd273f873633eb5c2ef45
35166 F20101208_AABAKR pasch_j_Page_067.QC.jpg
12ba9754e2e02283095d81de8c07d0a1
b7f7f0be3db3c4a169a3625b4595b4245d0a3e62
F20101208_AAAZOC pasch_j_Page_117.tif
8ab36dba94343551312975ca1760ad89
004a6a20d5618986178b22e20eb5af316791b030
F20101208_AAAZNO pasch_j_Page_103.tif
3a1e9cc1ddc268cac46310bb36d6b4f8
6f163f273a3db310ec32cb47d8428cd4a23a4dd9
8799 F20101208_AABALG pasch_j_Page_075thm.jpg
086c70fe6b3b2e684271b04749e481c8
291b8171803c964de41a36325059b05fab5825e4
8802 F20101208_AABAKS pasch_j_Page_068thm.jpg
efcefc57d14dd5ba67ac675f6c501683
763e4e41724c8f9c6b98cc325c5b7e42c0800f47
F20101208_AAAZOD pasch_j_Page_118.tif
95186926e8046bdbb7279601135fc891
c4b2d08abc0b5354cc9d305ea5833d8b368d4bed
F20101208_AAAZNP pasch_j_Page_104.tif
60c250a1a5845426f3addb3077d86e45
77b7cd8d1f30576831f20b357c8d70ab7cc92c95
35864 F20101208_AABALH pasch_j_Page_075.QC.jpg
4c14b4ed20690161067099a62ba94d94
15b0de07da6c2269f1252b5926818560798c3565
36508 F20101208_AABAKT pasch_j_Page_068.QC.jpg
502ea89a04b96e07b63099e9242f3239
81fdf1d218b0169915437e425815682382328c93
F20101208_AAAZOE pasch_j_Page_119.tif
cc1416bba6836af7b5261f0272671bb8
43502a6eba82c9ff60ddf563990b8e35c7998dac
F20101208_AAAZNQ pasch_j_Page_105.tif
e0636d224c57c93300ccb6fcde13d932
8a10257a557f9e16730df2ea1f1c4a752f00efe1
7240 F20101208_AABALI pasch_j_Page_076thm.jpg
5f3da8d76e457ff21b65fc4ac890f1fe
b5ffe57f974acf994c285a9ad9b8bfecbc65b277
8392 F20101208_AABAKU pasch_j_Page_069thm.jpg
244f547c91b51ff9fb5033a11eb6fa43
ec5007490680c758445e3250e6bf494cae66380a
F20101208_AAAZOF pasch_j_Page_120.tif
f058a6d715df002fc12d7ee4190efc34
8b607d41b44547b01034ae5c941f3a25e38cdf05
F20101208_AAAZNR pasch_j_Page_106.tif
a161e336d991efc7a382e3bbdb811d6d
303fbbb68bbb0c6a6ec6c7edb988603468744a60
29919 F20101208_AABALJ pasch_j_Page_076.QC.jpg
63baf378642714558730fa68b4294012
73031be9b22b3fcca75174549c89ccc9672518a0
34027 F20101208_AABAKV pasch_j_Page_069.QC.jpg
81a21acef56053d83b8311515556155f
3d68305f8ca80f78f141673b9a294019c828ed4e
F20101208_AAAZOG pasch_j_Page_121.tif
87214c6e56f9210440901746be88800d
72aaa687c7a3e0d7087def1880f0ddab8340fa5c
F20101208_AAAZNS pasch_j_Page_107.tif
034d20adc695e8e98d7b032ee36ee896
528c3cbe312c86cecccd5a75b78e62b594861c00
6882 F20101208_AABALK pasch_j_Page_077thm.jpg
001f3504b7e92020113cf727ebdafe9b
37c35ad7b8acbbda37ce6375600072b3c7064b92
5940 F20101208_AABAKW pasch_j_Page_070thm.jpg
f9ddc25db315c0072fa7130953da4b3e
50c59d05cc0566491d35801f9637b28545912b3e
F20101208_AAAZOH pasch_j_Page_122.tif
ceba0bb6c46ced98385cd02a1eb8b018
3157e34c4b3406489f19b2d1ab007d5d315d0ded
F20101208_AAAZNT pasch_j_Page_108.tif
b3609c316c8df645d54e20fb4793ce37
82b4bb0a8c30da5952cb51763fdf89c19b42aae4
31801 F20101208_AABALL pasch_j_Page_077.QC.jpg
0fb5626348f14eae472f64809b198f96
ad4adcecf09fb8b9f9588b08f3c0ad64385bfd4e
20606 F20101208_AABAKX pasch_j_Page_070.QC.jpg
fa82503dd1b577d62158eae1d4650c3e
f6fb92c4d36afd8ebacf188f394e870194c1e8c9
F20101208_AAAZOI pasch_j_Page_123.tif
4a911e08993bbb356dd5b9f12661d5d0
9031460b36715f6ab29f8f8179cfb538b192889c
F20101208_AAAZNU pasch_j_Page_109.tif
2d42e49d3035c56581f05d14ab83926f
d0ba59dde72a7b29e7091f60416dc5fda1982d15
5853 F20101208_AABAMA pasch_j_Page_085thm.jpg
90cc1cb3b68d0e858a5ff3581b719030
4db03cdee408305082c51ed6187a6ec642eb2814
6806 F20101208_AABALM pasch_j_Page_078thm.jpg
533a7d56b901554a07d4ab440c3d4026
e7e7d9d69f2aabb55f560dde40603099d457a64f
F20101208_AAAZOJ pasch_j_Page_124.tif
36addde1272ebbf7a76fc7dc92ccae5f
258b2aff2cac16d5cf1103ca18933035745f57d5
F20101208_AAAZNV pasch_j_Page_110.tif
2ba6d74889af6fc94fd1093feaf2cbf8
cd9a155225fef8726a19de8f2e6909a26b16291d
21355 F20101208_AABAMB pasch_j_Page_085.QC.jpg
c81d698a93430a2ab8aa40dd70539c03
5d76f22446371e6e0d2fd82866c4a50c24c845a9
29468 F20101208_AABALN pasch_j_Page_078.QC.jpg
8e63486af71bdace6294dac7db478870
27234db55b155ed1f3082a888318f559b0c54d8f
7756 F20101208_AABAKY pasch_j_Page_071thm.jpg
2e0910d16550d512247d0e04017d7095
2e0fe83f9852d1e44c631043f16dd9be53cd98e4
F20101208_AAAZOK pasch_j_Page_125.tif
88ff6409d9dc7e9f8273c25145d5cf23
7f026bd0eba2355c7fe868c08e63290594b25f89
F20101208_AAAZNW pasch_j_Page_111.tif
1ef9d951d7e412352b088f2971caccfb
81f0b627d0229a241cce0a5a7d1c90aff7d6191e
6329 F20101208_AABAMC pasch_j_Page_086thm.jpg
25d2618188900418e57601ac3bb40794
69a956eee9ae960890810488ba3ca9cabd47451e
8998 F20101208_AABALO pasch_j_Page_079thm.jpg
33a1ff5e729476f799f736f5dcca418d
a55d977bc05062e3507a0c0271381a797e3a6a20
31876 F20101208_AABAKZ pasch_j_Page_071.QC.jpg
9822af639571bb3dfb58d1f9b87ad727
8283a3282ca36d29fdd16adae4f3af146c5c98ea
F20101208_AAAZPA pasch_j_Page_141.tif
6f7ed3bca27b1ca3857b62069032968b
2ceee74be05a3080de92491de29c88a284f75aa1
F20101208_AAAZOL pasch_j_Page_126.tif
95c04f5bf66c13a7e5cbc74c9051a1a2
1751017e3003e03e9745d2beacd56d4e0edfac1d
F20101208_AAAZNX pasch_j_Page_112.tif
1f08c7c5ec6e0379471a572163d75593
4a79e917c99df32af64dbecfca79538f1f9cdbd2
23809 F20101208_AABAMD pasch_j_Page_086.QC.jpg
31513bdb52e0edf23f5e338515f66abd
dabb3d61673ee452b0f77be72a3d50bb89d644cd
35191 F20101208_AABALP pasch_j_Page_079.QC.jpg
982579efc3247e2cfb41d54d8fadff36
acc52e93ce640a538f164ce5e1d9db87897a1006
F20101208_AAAZPB pasch_j_Page_142.tif
3af16287ddfeb327885ffa7f9608148d
0d6a553807a7e2537dc93025833c823198f463f0
F20101208_AAAZOM pasch_j_Page_127.tif
50ced55a7e4608ac142aa52b3c164e3a
0416a6eb643f5c72d658105075afe01eb1a6b881
F20101208_AAAZNY pasch_j_Page_113.tif
4e455e4a9326f97386e125ed75ef0434
924aab2e4a78e2c5c0d84a83936d03fcc408e6da
7914 F20101208_AABAME pasch_j_Page_087thm.jpg
f487cbb15836a5f75af362131ed14181
f871d88db74b98ea5c6f5d5f9374f1f9ff7212fd
5706 F20101208_AABALQ pasch_j_Page_080thm.jpg
b559c988a0c5a229196f6dbcd4a02f4f
904b587d3156d2d5dbf3d5940bc2da087422d342
F20101208_AAAZPC pasch_j_Page_143.tif
c2c897a7b17dd1a109c62603cca838cd
dd54f068cba6eb5135d2314c29b1eba2ff1e66e9
F20101208_AAAZON pasch_j_Page_128.tif
9feb9ae5a2399abf35f47e84932931c2
e4aedb133da48fbf1ff253b1df887dbeb7a05933
F20101208_AAAZNZ pasch_j_Page_114.tif
fbb2755dcc71b802dc1c6d2cab85b17b
4d852c434fecf3ecf149a6037a7aea199103c1ba
26468 F20101208_AABAMF pasch_j_Page_087.QC.jpg
2f2c83c0633d637e2fd5b476ad0ad8c9
f36957cbdfe475a81642fdd0defb672ab364c7f8
19643 F20101208_AABALR pasch_j_Page_080.QC.jpg
5b104b4f7c9b931b7a2b5c8f6c66987a
778794a452c9e9b0755ef11038a627332c1f2de3
F20101208_AAAZOO pasch_j_Page_129.tif
1debbedb229795b29256d66b0e86ad51
ec7cfb3097d30994086197f8d1d2bbfc0f123c86
3970 F20101208_AABAMG pasch_j_Page_088thm.jpg
6205f697b4150cc42a5a36af90521d8f
891abeb2023b7d4e145d855d429b692c944e6f6d
6203 F20101208_AABALS pasch_j_Page_081thm.jpg
af13f2407c79a8069117a04818fb0d7d
bc576f3a3042bc201291a57285d03095c154c08a
F20101208_AAAZPD pasch_j_Page_144.tif
06fb6362574adf9c22a25a34611118a2
227ab7fc9814252a64a56190699c6eb4e51ad75e
F20101208_AAAZOP pasch_j_Page_130.tif
6457e5c835b09c814153af1995bd5ac6
19506745f0a2c96db53c5feec2df47da07fb0747
13121 F20101208_AABAMH pasch_j_Page_088.QC.jpg
ee74ebee8ff6cd55e9e86823c43ca2c2
56c643c6d02fc3e900fdd4ed9a91172337497a25
21964 F20101208_AABALT pasch_j_Page_081.QC.jpg
6b7f471f2fa3e0907edf6c18e249c89f
5b1191c61ce10310fdb6a7afb114f79417dc4bb8
F20101208_AAAZPE pasch_j_Page_145.tif
188601fb65a7c5336dd5eba53a506cba
3f121bbbe36b698b2ce6467e843f4bbb20db9792
F20101208_AAAZOQ pasch_j_Page_131.tif
bea4114f94045895691c550df1818aad
b3d480bdeb6c24323cb08dc4c5eaffe021ac3ad2
5344 F20101208_AABAMI pasch_j_Page_089thm.jpg
933dec8ef3728c1f02eeb29c366b302f
3352aed508b0441573839e90f99e392dd94786ed
3648 F20101208_AABALU pasch_j_Page_082thm.jpg
ae3d966dd4490c32992c3f03ef20d200
61036dbe5b77dec6b70e430f81d4a1e7385e4a72
F20101208_AAAZPF pasch_j_Page_146.tif
be1416c92afc28c083afedd41d14bafe
4affdfb7a22381e4297ef7f86c2c7a3d4980a07a
F20101208_AAAZOR pasch_j_Page_132.tif
1685c580f4c397df328575d817953806
b3377a10b8d8f948a1e34e5e185106030dc49e1b
17525 F20101208_AABAMJ pasch_j_Page_089.QC.jpg
b1bced45a12f13548211fa63120c2df0
1daf6c75fad6b439525bfa08994f243869d4df59
11672 F20101208_AABALV pasch_j_Page_082.QC.jpg
8b5a693667ced1aaf7c5a07318911694
fda5aea336b578aec99c7ac4f328967c915d5c9e
F20101208_AAAZPG pasch_j_Page_147.tif
fef7c21123fa24d6e36914150a322fff
e5a688df8fe588fa2b2cab4ed7806670db5af9a8
F20101208_AAAZOS pasch_j_Page_133.tif
142a5262bce191e679339e1c22d9ff96
2aff85bc4811a251f424f72cce799272df1b363f
7752 F20101208_AABAMK pasch_j_Page_090thm.jpg
aad24d69a9aa0bcd81c3d8f2f5df134b
4496cc0a1cf1b23778ff7b7039ca0ca38833f5c0
5112 F20101208_AABALW pasch_j_Page_083thm.jpg
060178dab2c9556418fc52087f7fe2b0
69664c1cf3abe2b936d7792b1fcec5995f427d27
F20101208_AAAZPH pasch_j_Page_148.tif
9e61d4e9067757baa81d3010630350f7
65d5fdbe24357c1121db57b6d96772b0a963a50d
F20101208_AAAZOT pasch_j_Page_134.tif
5916a87fb9baa86c27ad13384ad03f41
2ac5e3447c907818a6b4aa8f077a1c57ddef3bf1
29454 F20101208_AABAML pasch_j_Page_090.QC.jpg
56b78ab6ee176b4ee2b91ccd0a436473
e8fdac35efc5286aafa9afe4674a700100362bc6
16893 F20101208_AABALX pasch_j_Page_083.QC.jpg
c2fa771589b9367494493c296977ec63
6f062ff87c1461e0324072c4e2ab2ceea5130624
F20101208_AAAZPI pasch_j_Page_149.tif
9521a5962015e97cd53af0ea5970c797
7a5280c89b6687cefa3d719e6894f9b8169d2c47
F20101208_AAAZOU pasch_j_Page_135.tif
971cf52a5bdbb58ad526bc22adaeb6de
5b6b5661bcf21f58aa5d405bda464b2d3fa9cdfb
5161 F20101208_AABANA pasch_j_Page_098thm.jpg
6dadffc320f45d965e863b3c55e42b4e
cdf3d7b214b9f6521da7858832e365c7d9f11d4b
8765 F20101208_AABAMM pasch_j_Page_091thm.jpg
8fea1635fcfdb35dd291c9a4f77faa86
b7f1665b217a6fff8664f53a2edca3ffc4d8b0e2
5733 F20101208_AABALY pasch_j_Page_084thm.jpg
0baeb835ff7f1fda7b79ec4837dc01c9
c819646a2fa544cb080c5ffaa3dbcc84bc594c28
F20101208_AAAZPJ pasch_j_Page_150.tif
ff0bfbea644a76f6661e516c61e006b2
a34bf46273dbc9585e96a25c391b177cb17404ca
F20101208_AAAZOV pasch_j_Page_136.tif
e3394ba039039087b269e55d611abc26
c3456b68fcfd74518b68c9fe07373d92b8ef732c
20812 F20101208_AABANB pasch_j_Page_098.QC.jpg
11023cb94048e2694c06f049e6a48e66
0b13f9cd5af139b48424deb58f55e2710319a462
35642 F20101208_AABAMN pasch_j_Page_091.QC.jpg
054b57c8efe3af3be16a5c80789dff67
06079c0278747b408c6ea26e20b78f024fcf44c1
F20101208_AAAZPK pasch_j_Page_151.tif
abb34e35d216b122b5375595e7c5075f
5dc938680b8d1d0664d50b89257b08a2e42d3cc5
F20101208_AAAZOW pasch_j_Page_137.tif
a3bbbc350355f362c4a7538d9670421f
f0cb187c31fc4a9ed9972a87f87bcc39a08ced44
1639 F20101208_AABANC pasch_j_Page_099thm.jpg
faf63e65edb2b2cad4a0d767a74d49c1
91b98c4e622f3a574ad4800d5d2671b000b59343
8603 F20101208_AABAMO pasch_j_Page_092thm.jpg
0203fc2101b1d9eb4b82ced7e24d2585
3f87526bbe861cf2d45c315e7a6a855f1741d8e0
19010 F20101208_AABALZ pasch_j_Page_084.QC.jpg
c1b184f533f796d069b490faf097bae0
e49799204c7d86a4d44beb349b3b8d1aa250d600
F20101208_AAAZPL pasch_j_Page_152.tif
40cb866322ab17a34fdf5e2272f93540
b585f1a064077c219a59b3fae38442f3e77c4b1c
F20101208_AAAZOX pasch_j_Page_138.tif
e2c6f4ee59d11b3e034f4d05e8b1eb4d
124f3671b13f0b0f3813768a562854452d2fce9b
F20101208_AAAZQA pasch_j_Page_167.tif
3a2c150aa9f19640ebf60fc2f30afbe2
41d0ac0f4e7e8d2397b561a973baa9c8573c6607
5654 F20101208_AABAND pasch_j_Page_099.QC.jpg
85a6697de8e891d81e02efa7baf0dedb
14a28395090bb5e8dd3172ccc2f7df62741f19e5
35388 F20101208_AABAMP pasch_j_Page_092.QC.jpg
8156653e8da9bcbe4e507564131a25f4
9b59e43ea415412407b265b3cbaa2e2777b8b0d2
F20101208_AAAZPM pasch_j_Page_153.tif
b0fdd86edafb45480182f90f490a8496
2ddbc389e1862a09ff11938809040c1632616958
F20101208_AAAZOY pasch_j_Page_139.tif
941e206e70c699b1401f899b83ad338e
3a5f2c22aaf41d14ed27c876cfb4ce28fd817e26
F20101208_AAAZQB pasch_j_Page_168.tif
bf8c0f9517ef47aa47bbf8078151a854
0c99dd5d83296ff4fa4f234c2677f1abdd9bd119
F20101208_AABANE pasch_j_Page_100thm.jpg
05263333d8391761e5cbf88dc1d3c960
2ae5b1c04b3809093d2301dd204c2c5486a6be78
8339 F20101208_AABAMQ pasch_j_Page_093thm.jpg
dfe2ecf5bce5ac8cf9f77d3bc488174e
eeaf024411ef321881d4b5277cc2850d6cc75417
F20101208_AAAZPN pasch_j_Page_154.tif
7546bd8fa2c75ba6f55d27b04c60662d
3dd52a4226e7c0a45af12b1e56ef89ebee6f4f08
F20101208_AAAZOZ pasch_j_Page_140.tif
e4fd484d89a34b8195aad3201728cb31
5443ab74e4737e124dc138569cc90c83fcbfcaa2
F20101208_AAAZQC pasch_j_Page_169.tif
43fe6b6983dae96e12ec60e8b6630d1f
cf81dc09a3030359c1bbc7d916c76e8a8b4663bf
17510 F20101208_AABANF pasch_j_Page_100.QC.jpg
08cdcdb482b7f2b93ebcc44229829868
c740889a33b29f66df00e30a24ab4259253f00cf
34691 F20101208_AABAMR pasch_j_Page_093.QC.jpg
450674c8441bda3e33802db4ab28e35a
a88ff6570de27d6f77d7d1b5e87e16c76a623e57
F20101208_AAAZPO pasch_j_Page_155.tif
278952c0612821d2fb85007bd03c5e19
b09fe3f3cbc23ff78816535a8a5466cf02d60367
F20101208_AAAZQD pasch_j_Page_170.tif
849240851e3ccce2df83b7e56f5be65e
4694fa0dedaf9076fbabda2b74d17c5202917925
7998 F20101208_AABANG pasch_j_Page_101thm.jpg
42a601572c0db76d31e98b0402c367af
2a13a429bd5e307515ca36e389df1227a5cb7d70
8744 F20101208_AABAMS pasch_j_Page_094thm.jpg
6ead94ec68e5f49b27c23732d7eadca5
d59f52c93cd18d09fa923234b3851d76de03cdac
F20101208_AAAZPP pasch_j_Page_156.tif
a785764c3d7ea5b3602bd965d2f20993
2318f2435a2292b391ec646ac34744b614f72ba2
26958 F20101208_AABANH pasch_j_Page_101.QC.jpg
261ee1f853c0ed6bb4cdd1d08d4c703a
250a3443f7b1cb014f66cda4047baeef4037c772
35069 F20101208_AABAMT pasch_j_Page_094.QC.jpg
37ef4e25c12335af1172e80882844dcf
1b3e08860489f4b1df8e5294311c3bb12ce396e0
F20101208_AAAZPQ pasch_j_Page_157.tif
8edd095dc181c4a8c77177372f01672a
e4c0d7929fbe993516977c10801c2b602fb6cd85
F20101208_AAAZQE pasch_j_Page_171.tif
25b3053c00424f50e0d5eae09633c808
6f701c2aad505c660162f555e13c6d7ea6a19a3b
5617 F20101208_AABANI pasch_j_Page_102thm.jpg
103dd93ed9a7f76232aa7dc2132026ee
c0dba0bd82b3a7a926ba8e71e084654303d7a50a
8581 F20101208_AABAMU pasch_j_Page_095thm.jpg
12651a1132f8e0b00e97d4399560df99
374dc53b2d5bc3d9ca4684b530c553a21cf5717d
F20101208_AAAZPR pasch_j_Page_158.tif
99b7c27921bac444dd80100a33afc163
f8650df59b076b332419ed6ae01efb1c87ace31f
F20101208_AAAZQF pasch_j_Page_172.tif
3d01ddd5bbaddf321dcab04bc56343b0
601a571827509f8baefa4f3e6ad2f81005deac52
18605 F20101208_AABANJ pasch_j_Page_102.QC.jpg
35eea916484b8e8e1f11af265daf9097
4a23da4e6adac6260385963ad4734f1ce71eef31
35998 F20101208_AABAMV pasch_j_Page_095.QC.jpg
fb89a8fc9d6f6b93c7f4c78e4320e9ac
709a42efd734e55512616dddcefbed4e0122de7d
F20101208_AAAZPS pasch_j_Page_159.tif
9687ae86dcf898932996d9ff29bba8cf
ec55094b94d7e59fb6b520e91caac0be2681e5d9
F20101208_AAAZQG pasch_j_Page_173.tif
2a3489d4f7031fae20932a19d1204689
c5577ea259604dc41a1b283610ee0894f00e835b
7218 F20101208_AABANK pasch_j_Page_103thm.jpg
9e6ced3dd99259203b20b36f011d3aaf
c7139b07dfe2da2c5d947d075cb4d385a0bede7d
8509 F20101208_AABAMW pasch_j_Page_096thm.jpg
c177a81fd06eb16be81d62ec2a8bb068
16494e7c39789e6d659e184e14b278054b2ecb73
F20101208_AAAZPT pasch_j_Page_160.tif
e5d1359283ac3742ec3f23f8374f194e
bb2c5f649d6e5aa0a944a5695984c2d80a2cff69
F20101208_AAAZQH pasch_j_Page_174.tif
a59005f5c8cc5ec21ec6cfc11899ef25
eee307569b8ac8e3dee0b6dbd888eaec6e0467d4
25123 F20101208_AABANL pasch_j_Page_103.QC.jpg
d2e75e74f766a93245a4312fb92c92a1
f858506d0486e467aab63fe6f11e1ea34373e75c
33665 F20101208_AABAMX pasch_j_Page_096.QC.jpg
500739f8c6343ab7afde8357cde45312
3fb338125fffb9082e8ed4c994f7e90be52fb29c
F20101208_AAAZPU pasch_j_Page_161.tif
c86f376b9d6c9f3cd1675cae384d8ce0
66c0e58ef5cde2a06752086300d7ce504f1b59be
F20101208_AAAZQI pasch_j_Page_175.tif
32d3c1e9710b92677b7f4c102dfae250
85a3e4e2c44c8ea4796582642ac6a268034adfbd
8206 F20101208_AABAOA pasch_j_Page_111thm.jpg
4dc47a73a07e3138ce4e54b1dbb5191b
52bba0cc0e709b388b46f0d347c45914d47ebddc
7264 F20101208_AABANM pasch_j_Page_104thm.jpg
b65b59a78baa53baa77d97b21de58494
292eb3926ef8d2fd9251de3a355004fcc1e78288
7530 F20101208_AABAMY pasch_j_Page_097thm.jpg
d81cfcfe41817d08fdf4e3233aa38a84
b502a97ef416b8f517451b31e0da45806b7031b1
F20101208_AAAZPV pasch_j_Page_162.tif
fcb70a7c0d6b226c5dfb3546f9f1fa14
c1eab3328753651ae90543e7bf519fd752cf2115
F20101208_AAAZQJ pasch_j_Page_176.tif
ed85e44294d314b955bab57c8e1496c4
1d785e9e2aa47607ba6a97732dcf59c9235227bf
34292 F20101208_AABAOB pasch_j_Page_111.QC.jpg
83b6f134676bf020fd8726eb15725106
73a61681a784a9af9ba8996eae182a7ef67aaf9e
25229 F20101208_AABANN pasch_j_Page_104.QC.jpg
cbd5be156018747364561ac12e9065d2
ae4b11828503dbc5d130d34d161aca01047c0d19
30043 F20101208_AABAMZ pasch_j_Page_097.QC.jpg
e619dd3f45e2dced28a1ca2c928c8e16
9c358bdde4f64e17a71caa3a746df7f2742ed975
F20101208_AAAZPW pasch_j_Page_163.tif
93cdc1fe89f33d1da4bce44d1de3a29d
bcddb60f884ba15f0965cea0cb3b8f9c74bb2d2d
F20101208_AAAZQK pasch_j_Page_177.tif
4518eed47add40f55e67dccb9aa177dc
f0094393d2d9155255e54ddf8167642c330c51f1
7694 F20101208_AABAOC pasch_j_Page_112thm.jpg
f727f0aa78e08263a5fa730038dbe461
c5230f4c7f088ecd27595e50928addc2b2da12bb
4087 F20101208_AABANO pasch_j_Page_105thm.jpg
90e64f660822bea8e34b5710eae5f641
2f3748c2c10296b5bd1b33c10b43a6dc7bc38cf2
F20101208_AAAZPX pasch_j_Page_164.tif
1f8df3745fa7316badfa6c11f70dafbe
bbe74ab1653445f42aa5c17aa27ad70771df5976
7946 F20101208_AAAZRA pasch_j_Page_003.pro
7235c1c1e372babf31ff9dbbaa34da5d
827edc1c48409c05802e47879bef5d708553b751
F20101208_AAAZQL pasch_j_Page_178.tif
6bd87b1cc5055f010ceb05d76abb9b41
b24992a74e0eaf3033695ecdeb88f6e7c0e5f60c
28864 F20101208_AABAOD pasch_j_Page_112.QC.jpg
9446bd0de52670e26e9d4b49631f4825
4d26b39937c4159d17ceff10888414f84c0a369c
13578 F20101208_AABANP pasch_j_Page_105.QC.jpg
e9397965da072244194b3b5096352b46
a145fa9cd545a72a64a0f94d5f80f066b9ba60ce
F20101208_AAAZPY pasch_j_Page_165.tif
74122b1d107034d8765a8c47138037d8
6711d7bbae027a52cb08d335923e5b609754e54c
19094 F20101208_AAAZRB pasch_j_Page_004.pro
7cad1dc0466de9d81c907b113d752255
7510162c2b1b614f3edf221249d3a5c6679f6f42
F20101208_AAAZQM pasch_j_Page_179.tif
7dfee17172e06884f17d4cead526f4f5
4352b53d3bff121e1145556929fe49b1915b9e33
9107 F20101208_AABAOE pasch_j_Page_113thm.jpg
b03463679c68d9b343e387f9f6761369
cf1faf484a2460fc5c295bcf73795ca0f3a6145b
7886 F20101208_AABANQ pasch_j_Page_106thm.jpg
c114b91a447fba8a6a73b0cc84cb0bbe
6ee2b957302282d9ea41a45dc0cfd3443caee6b8
F20101208_AAAZPZ pasch_j_Page_166.tif
8ef028c51e0e618002400860a44c0375
1879a76c331801e5345a52d407cddadb0a39c726
70099 F20101208_AAAZRC pasch_j_Page_005.pro
9068b4fb8e22478e287920d5cb4892f8
0b6afb22d74579d84dc012a8e72b1393d8d8f1ff
F20101208_AAAZQN pasch_j_Page_180.tif
ca483ef12ed21d2e61efdf02ce5dc090
9d437b8b0c17d5ed3c46756f882ac1640becb658
37999 F20101208_AABAOF pasch_j_Page_113.QC.jpg
0de75ba3e9ef8a706d1da72b36eed92d
86bfd2e342d90cfc3400894044e0fff6d9e18beb
31160 F20101208_AABANR pasch_j_Page_106.QC.jpg
3e22b9fee63f64d32259eb2f0301a929
369d1fe37a3135f72982be915407fff7321420cb
80477 F20101208_AAAZRD pasch_j_Page_006.pro
48bdcdd2ed775ed0103389bf0d6582d8
b85b7852f837bef055701a962a5483ae6e6ca2f5
F20101208_AAAZQO pasch_j_Page_181.tif
b435f4fade1f7cf4d6a4822048026eae
fb2c416ab595ce6a91f78bc45366ad356c21b185
8216 F20101208_AABAOG pasch_j_Page_114thm.jpg
8612d7195a76c8a47546ecf59f3fa444
29e4af535684ef2ab7f787fa58ec9564c17480b3
8470 F20101208_AABANS pasch_j_Page_107thm.jpg
193a7766c85ad24340e4b9af1964c064
6138d9d78b20012de8618fab7d66859f57148d1a
29827 F20101208_AAAZRE pasch_j_Page_007.pro
5721b303ca242fabf8cf45022267dc32
92f8e0b53739ccc4a209d4fdf6fc4085c2c37167
F20101208_AAAZQP pasch_j_Page_182.tif
04446c9f02cb0269135b4345a9238474
92f6d5c11f91c740993a438366739fe7510f34e2
33553 F20101208_AABAOH pasch_j_Page_114.QC.jpg
078a2dc6778cfbe40dc8d4dfc43b45d5
1df2b1519ff813aef5ee3c47512a8aef97cbce26
34181 F20101208_AABANT pasch_j_Page_107.QC.jpg
9a73b8ba903d380f0135a7e9b84ec18a
0e1e7dabfcb5236584101754845fe4e8e63b1202
F20101208_AAAZQQ pasch_j_Page_183.tif
741783bc3a73e97a20749afc08e2d0db
1829d759573f59dee351cfc15dfc032923a59b40
7690 F20101208_AABAOI pasch_j_Page_115thm.jpg
43880213b07edade6fd5afb7fb412d47
70f942cfcef1c7625ed16a5ea1dbd6829b9a1c90
7985 F20101208_AABANU pasch_j_Page_108thm.jpg
8b6c19c938e6f91995ab172d31bee999
356a9c054232fa91ebbdb4212f8f850bba92c483
59871 F20101208_AAAZRF pasch_j_Page_008.pro
fd6a2862d87bdbf8bec159816585ba94
e91263cb3288527dbb5951ab01331af17c45d3be
F20101208_AAAZQR pasch_j_Page_184.tif
35a011f21b8cadbefc61fd39c95e0ea1
8b4f40a867f22dc514d72743a3167eafade2bcda
31945 F20101208_AABAOJ pasch_j_Page_115.QC.jpg
c6e9ff75d4ef1e6228e753408dc4990f
3e79472df2feb4274fe400d3a7c800560074efbf
30723 F20101208_AABANV pasch_j_Page_108.QC.jpg
ea073b7d239f450d9d34a9d325320018
0516ea199aea12d15de02112db2be7d61d255ce8
68875 F20101208_AAAZRG pasch_j_Page_009.pro
d0feb70e0af816f289041ecfd9f04347
ac12a0eeeef40ec83ee38754bf1cd7eef49930d2
F20101208_AAAZQS pasch_j_Page_185.tif
a95d1842e33f1bd81660b6392d6b2cb2
727cf4e4381d9d06ecbb53048a72f11186930df2
8170 F20101208_AABAOK pasch_j_Page_116thm.jpg
d6b2fa6e20db1482a454fd0b755e7ccd
24edd19ee5d73e32eaee8aab0d9b549628417204
8228 F20101208_AABANW pasch_j_Page_109thm.jpg
c8422c8b9e8bb783fa9e743d29467ae4
4338c5b0982cd4c607a4b1db20205307363088e8
64520 F20101208_AAAZRH pasch_j_Page_010.pro
6a791ba95b3ca95c22328d3522d4934e
2508065867fa234585bd3f27cf7bfba22608c2cd
F20101208_AAAZQT pasch_j_Page_186.tif
d1dfb5ca94090a0f102134794955cca9
3de1680ac1bf262612c897c9e1ea5f86e6b73f39
35119 F20101208_AABAOL pasch_j_Page_116.QC.jpg
c3c9770ab1263ca80f0f9b0111d0223a
e027121ffcd91d82b90e29914c314e4f247afccc
33326 F20101208_AABANX pasch_j_Page_109.QC.jpg
c55c13cfecddfafe8d7d6ed4ce5a6afa
27f3923cb69ce6c29788122a743063ac45152afd
13278 F20101208_AAAZRI pasch_j_Page_011.pro
679779222776b42a7ffa7a4733765304
2ac36130e90762afd1acadb4c6e270f0613eab7d
F20101208_AAAZQU pasch_j_Page_187.tif
fe10a714019ae092a52243839a31b3f0
fc0d89e0ff6ea249eb2a89ccb3229b9c3bd57d7e
6058 F20101208_AABAPA pasch_j_Page_124thm.jpg
63a226a3deb371d1039c4132e26238a8
f4b5868af1988ffbe822c295fa3ec588422371ba
9014 F20101208_AABAOM pasch_j_Page_117thm.jpg
a73edb914065078099e43dd324abee45
3efac975d4fa55b68d54127eea8231a2538d9402
8501 F20101208_AABANY pasch_j_Page_110thm.jpg
606c5ee4e6b03530be8562fcbb4bb5f3
d815a6f4573b4eb8b6c288dcda0da90f9b630f82
15611 F20101208_AAAZRJ pasch_j_Page_012.pro
f530134480d320e0db350c2c5e56da80
3d70733c5e7ffd8599506c260d5bf72a0b25a2cd
F20101208_AAAZQV pasch_j_Page_188.tif
052088c9f04b07aab043729ce7d44ffe
93461c760ef52ae975c5816abc9bf66435fe8a80
19360 F20101208_AABAPB pasch_j_Page_124.QC.jpg
22dfc02864b7fd86cfe3ae17986ed6d6
bda005a0ca2c6420873127031c2a6e17b3cc5ed0
35592 F20101208_AABAON pasch_j_Page_117.QC.jpg
fa835ceb029159f7ffe5b86299ceb540
68cc728642522f5f25e43e51bc48d46836d1794c
35363 F20101208_AABANZ pasch_j_Page_110.QC.jpg
4c7e49a4a99d28a17bd502eb95bf9038
b62ffc2cde4e603d6aa3ccdfd9599c6b6a27e100
14513 F20101208_AAAZRK pasch_j_Page_013.pro
997db35f59a611968a27e17ec82dac06
7aff8d38f4340791c2c30dafd0bba6f2d238c32a
F20101208_AAAZQW pasch_j_Page_189.tif
9cd96368b2188caad4ad6d8eaee3203e
9945a7224b9f98ccbc382893cd3a2fe57dce176f
6090 F20101208_AABAPC pasch_j_Page_125thm.jpg
8c26075ffddc79afca91dc93df2a8bc4
6881cbf77cc8539f303d731dc26ed68bb934f4a9
8629 F20101208_AABAOO pasch_j_Page_118thm.jpg
083587ed69f2d37b017372ccd5bb70ef
6b939d5651bf4e6f8b7a43b833785aee6e252bfa
30933 F20101208_AAAZSA pasch_j_Page_029.pro
948f7a5bb0885428de82c26ff98eb1be
445cec1c50eab703edf077be5b3248ac50089a29
9751 F20101208_AAAZRL pasch_j_Page_014.pro
ffa921d907b0006790f6f3a56b1bb520
370f366167fe137153a4a5ee9c32ce9b6c0bbe4f
F20101208_AAAZQX pasch_j_Page_190.tif
22b7dfd19470c2b4f39a54ca30d8c868
3233e1ca2a57ab6236c4974ae6ed37e135a2102f
19455 F20101208_AABAPD pasch_j_Page_125.QC.jpg
5661a3806288b41d628d4771b6d3e6c7
961649ad10c75eab29b3c7fb935eafc77714df85
35257 F20101208_AABAOP pasch_j_Page_118.QC.jpg
e91d465159321ed044d39fbb92c7978c
c43f2e23f26078365be20a2922031c494f3fab39
37765 F20101208_AAAZSB pasch_j_Page_030.pro
ba0719824478fb775b0563e6fbc9b30c
3b7b8f9caebb69337bf4726df7df2f0c5f6d84f6
12450 F20101208_AAAZRM pasch_j_Page_015.pro
a5e77368368d97e2cf9c381bc826fc73
8e538bd02d1ab1af42887e2913af174c60fdda45
7784 F20101208_AAAZQY pasch_j_Page_001.pro
ac4e6436419ee31b00ef66c8f0072c94
3ebb13531ea481169b2903f97af2db1e172f638c
5811 F20101208_AABAPE pasch_j_Page_126thm.jpg
8a0d870516eac9a50d95b66f2758bca5
72fb873a883911b8a796d16e495c2721be7ce055
8794 F20101208_AABAOQ pasch_j_Page_119thm.jpg
4a4bc94e612a9b5d11afa934991f2136
72219aabd35be435124d17ef70caaed7bdc70051
43919 F20101208_AAAZSC pasch_j_Page_031.pro
aa0b8f28d7da86c19df7f8d52924d8f2
aaa4e3baab915059486643e34477c3daa9f2b780
44893 F20101208_AAAZRN pasch_j_Page_016.pro
aa70c2408f897291f4dc46b3e7ee11d9
be5876534af477856caf96627d326f68fbe1537c
1067 F20101208_AAAZQZ pasch_j_Page_002.pro
72c5b8894f5ee54f4c4fa0a6cc65d6e8
aa18c6747882a08ba05e896c6de1c5be77de4561
18993 F20101208_AABAPF pasch_j_Page_126.QC.jpg
1d1028332e866f46ced4fd3f93ae043f
b6c2770a54757365281f4c571a891f8b4d738669
36434 F20101208_AABAOR pasch_j_Page_119.QC.jpg
0d7d87008e0368a0ae86f25e2a6e18d3
a42f496bc903b3703526e92f12c783eeef5e43f8
54616 F20101208_AAAZSD pasch_j_Page_032.pro
ab8d7e51ed1b30ce45a8f53ecf2d9eea
a1b382d66711e4c93ef6d4ce631dfd8a6c8010f0
22238 F20101208_AAAZRO pasch_j_Page_017.pro
e937fcb844cc5d299115a0a7a1c14687
b0501b4828cf7d0f96189e069b052d14460651e0
6185 F20101208_AABAPG pasch_j_Page_127thm.jpg
bf1b5a630f80b0dca3db466534c8bb8c
b8eb07d1cd2b1a665843e5ccc5abd5878e899bc0
4496 F20101208_AABAOS pasch_j_Page_120thm.jpg
a541645d99863b1f80297057008577e0
d4c4cb099be66c43a9b8ef3799fd64aa61dbc2bc
57272 F20101208_AAAZSE pasch_j_Page_033.pro
020ec1f6158f00e92c1a44abb6a53efd
213f21696bce2524e340a85088ac91f149d6131e
50648 F20101208_AAAZRP pasch_j_Page_018.pro
05b3f3445cb54aa83623b74e1836a60e
ff272dc1eac8b2d70e24d1a40c3d3d851558c406
19768 F20101208_AABAPH pasch_j_Page_127.QC.jpg
6a9a8191cc6f2ad4e71106ac5096faf1
a432f5a83ceb89ffa0f0800ca4d3b01529cfbb2a
18838 F20101208_AABAOT pasch_j_Page_120.QC.jpg
abd389ff8ba2516943c512189f592abe
8db93ea65f8146751018e1423d7a21b464c62e69
53435 F20101208_AAAZSF pasch_j_Page_034.pro
c3b8e1a091900ab64d9cbdab8a14f4f1
f26c6a32be4bfcf2d9b1e343c04c9ca802de001a
51168 F20101208_AAAZRQ pasch_j_Page_019.pro
9db9018b374d13771888ca368c9d159c
83e448c0328c08114f13c2d2007047ef74e7ff28
6244 F20101208_AABAPI pasch_j_Page_128thm.jpg
8a9d0ac985a33842d0a2181f65671268
8a763cb4dd46bdeac09d7e458dec20f4c3adc647
7693 F20101208_AABAOU pasch_j_Page_121thm.jpg
e0b9c9208dfd2cc0824d556d16acc317
15051670cdb476ea8dcb972c2a73e2a45ef2d50a
34114 F20101208_AAAZRR pasch_j_Page_020.pro
3042cdade057d362fa0f8c7bf13c58d5
6a537241d6be98bf4f722b298beb4399c2ba3414
19467 F20101208_AABAPJ pasch_j_Page_128.QC.jpg
615fad36f8b55ee656397ff96c611306
eadd0617b5c138029c25dd4a3b1abea4949ac508
27087 F20101208_AABAOV pasch_j_Page_121.QC.jpg
0549f0c46250557b3dcd476c519b63ef
f0098ca7da28880e871c3cfb73a46f1cbfc565d6
45153 F20101208_AAAZSG pasch_j_Page_035.pro
4cdbd58a67d0a890c6f816dcb75aee1b
ed2530cb073ba7d61d61914ff80079c902d86f60
43676 F20101208_AAAZRS pasch_j_Page_021.pro
7d2bab7329797df3a0456fcc2794c0e8
c76db043dcd5941af1b5308e1dbfd9560d782796
6115 F20101208_AABAPK pasch_j_Page_129thm.jpg
2d42d3462d71407d43482932dcee5154
7700a60fe8ac0d8e093ea76f3482fee85ec92cb4
4704 F20101208_AABAOW pasch_j_Page_122thm.jpg
b8817d5fc82832a90384ff494812b852
7e88ca73dc1642f4857f13ac085487818b4c1256
19466 F20101208_AAAZSH pasch_j_Page_036.pro
7c713f9ee21ffdb60958dd531eb0e847
27238e812e49c4d67ab2b532022b9f02592ceb66
45478 F20101208_AAAZRT pasch_j_Page_022.pro
487616c312f018318228af4fc16e7797
24ecb1583043456467df6e4393d19547ad4157f9
19380 F20101208_AABAPL pasch_j_Page_129.QC.jpg
586fc17410a3630e9e05f41f41f85575
15c7898ed0cca86ea73cffc3bd523a72ce0e8d43
15574 F20101208_AABAOX pasch_j_Page_122.QC.jpg
062e0de8f87b31e2e223ad67113ada47
ad9d5f018963adadd18a749393b6b41f90d27718
5983 F20101208_AAAZSI pasch_j_Page_037.pro
84c68453233a104a6c2466e77979017d
88494005f3d39d664cad6984a0646f45f6869f6e
46166 F20101208_AAAZRU pasch_j_Page_023.pro
796d88bffd0ff243cb69a34f8e16ca48
e0499e726bfc6d6b43e18e9eaf04dbacf23ba6b5
6302 F20101208_AABAQA pasch_j_Page_137thm.jpg
da58013d7f1fef8e061d4ab3b48fadb4
95f1995169e1fb3316b6e957c2965e4e29703536
6118 F20101208_AABAPM pasch_j_Page_130thm.jpg
708de674a8da2c6a5cacd0820afc570e
9e631a2cbe3a3cb45c0183114a7e24890d45f522
6957 F20101208_AABAOY pasch_j_Page_123thm.jpg
95fe308a74dac65f5a3f69369a72ec05
3245e7da7359d6804dfea735873e75c71305c9f8
50446 F20101208_AAAZSJ pasch_j_Page_038.pro
633826cd78d233116927fd5a5b215bb5
2c8827b5511e1e04c84ff4c2d0b647fc5cbb3f2d
27615 F20101208_AAAZRV pasch_j_Page_024.pro
977b819b3bc4678d17766d2d4f019e02
5b75fe546064eec19afa49a5a7f935e468d200dc
19908 F20101208_AABAQB pasch_j_Page_137.QC.jpg
0ef4ddf24559af7fdd6a8f31e3a82796
0bb984fc6ebb6c104ad8feb9c534f75a1905a735
19529 F20101208_AABAPN pasch_j_Page_130.QC.jpg
15ed53599fdbad0f7d3dfae104e1ddaa
695e5f6874431d475a9ce0e5dcd448d46951fe8e
25730 F20101208_AABAOZ pasch_j_Page_123.QC.jpg
c79109571cd306fe0e467eb35a4474dc
63205d025f3c748cc8640284661bf9f78ae053f2
54697 F20101208_AAAZSK pasch_j_Page_039.pro
38d69cfe74f6a424863e23958cccf0c3
a4c045d2bfbe52ce1aaf9c024101ba011471f657
25118 F20101208_AAAZRW pasch_j_Page_025.pro
03fafcfeeba1eacd85c67373d5687288
9dff50e27546166a3119d5efb54dbda8871c2355
6096 F20101208_AABAQC pasch_j_Page_138thm.jpg
fe656b625882f7515ab30ef109fe5081
afd00dc7a6648c8a10e65863bd2e892916efedf6
6146 F20101208_AABAPO pasch_j_Page_131thm.jpg
02337489812f735ed5f7b45be87afb2c
f12241b562d79e1ffd80250305dfddf90ee7815b
33604 F20101208_AAAZRX pasch_j_Page_026.pro
fe2fafb85d6c2ed85bbfed6ea51e447e
dc70b398829c2d0d84ad829ffe84a3fdfae1370d
57892 F20101208_AAAZTA pasch_j_Page_055.pro
3a8c7178422c41a7156eb6676597653b
4038e907ea87536c71ef5d0dad8702e7c7162e35
53593 F20101208_AAAZSL pasch_j_Page_040.pro
f0815c2826e52e863d68d37b2055ff4c
469f35599f88d09f8ab9966c31aa084894ae5c85
19470 F20101208_AABAQD pasch_j_Page_138.QC.jpg
bb7ef4e75db0e5fe181432c820075d63
e102afee801266cceb2c48415225c63d27d0c125
19275 F20101208_AABAPP pasch_j_Page_131.QC.jpg
17817958e350dc05f33db23255d732e5
46114c32f7d3feeb0bc321584716f4be94dadcb2
41109 F20101208_AAAZRY pasch_j_Page_027.pro
b7cecc2c9e17733620062f7a04ab5da5
dec0d49d8e14e29682cb24b49731862581f8dca8
54606 F20101208_AAAZTB pasch_j_Page_056.pro
77c3cd485e6a1d693aac2383c86e4dd7
e2c854e39528f20c52fccea07f272421c6582acf
57259 F20101208_AAAZSM pasch_j_Page_041.pro
4bb02c67f9af03b537966b3762f366e7
fdde41ab74d703932835c40b2bc10d3cfbe1253c
6365 F20101208_AABAQE pasch_j_Page_139thm.jpg
8e5aee1445798eb3ed25e99a875c1c47
942e27215cc6dd1c7e98b6a9672c55cc5056708e
6194 F20101208_AABAPQ pasch_j_Page_132thm.jpg
8a2ae063d331f9bfe7f447680bb9e8b9
bbda00c59afdf104f8db55a8efa4fb163c1b11ef
41372 F20101208_AAAZRZ pasch_j_Page_028.pro
0d002dcb0677a9d9dd2c2c43f31c7804
b48370a2e420d42d657a68bd3ffb0796b65ec44c
45180 F20101208_AAAZTC pasch_j_Page_057.pro
cf864421f548c37042fa91c37125a1b5
de23fa3a640bdb788fce307f296e57602a563552
32230 F20101208_AAAZSN pasch_j_Page_042.pro
78127db0398664fb4dfa98233c55eb4c
2771539c7f64c73b6dec04756a7ae89c003cd502
20081 F20101208_AABAQF pasch_j_Page_139.QC.jpg
7a08b2452ce4025000c22494d77dfc3f
4d6167d41f9cc4504ac234e000193b3246de5a9f
19634 F20101208_AABAPR pasch_j_Page_132.QC.jpg
c1f44e0f6bf1e5d4580be87543e7384b
072bd612d6fba74800266d97bc08e760d201c2bb
54266 F20101208_AAAZTD pasch_j_Page_058.pro
4bcaf70ebd997a7beaeedf6f577e3f8e
5655097f31238e728ca257e6f50c5e9747c86765
13227 F20101208_AAAZSO pasch_j_Page_043.pro
d72c1d2705f9f8c85b53202dfe401db4
e54693a321709d7a7d4c1dcc7278f2c61e5114c0
6308 F20101208_AABAQG pasch_j_Page_140thm.jpg
b6b69fc3b6664222578b64afe89307d8
8dbfb65cdcb189225816253d795b9a74b40d21ac
6253 F20101208_AABAPS pasch_j_Page_133thm.jpg
d38ba27ab060601e14713ff917747a76
d404ca892bb7628ed816409e134eb9a63712f9f3
53529 F20101208_AAAZTE pasch_j_Page_059.pro
ba847b0effe71ce629d3fb38220ced9a
a09b28ea13970713aed16772cfd116f16e1084f4
50162 F20101208_AAAZSP pasch_j_Page_044.pro
7d97acaa1d5ac605a7045e51ad1c7e54
4c31f21b74e91cb6ec1e798136332d55f964ac77
19903 F20101208_AABAQH pasch_j_Page_140.QC.jpg
dfbe7113b9806943af7ce05eceeee694
3d0f2abfe684588b0776a60487bdbdc6f9a8f299
19738 F20101208_AABAPT pasch_j_Page_133.QC.jpg
3247fb159262c8c7b1c119246ba21f8d
23b0d80ab5e940cf2e295800d5f7add5e4cc4545
51759 F20101208_AAAZTF pasch_j_Page_060.pro
b66580d58862c06257935d4368158e6c
81f3cd758a2afdc314b146a9e8a3e22205ee756b
52291 F20101208_AAAZSQ pasch_j_Page_045.pro
e910a6d258ae4d6f903548bf922ee207
3cbe924d1471b98ea5338c61d5d0d5511e7a23c3
5873 F20101208_AABAQI pasch_j_Page_141thm.jpg
7e51ed3f55be6a6016242c9c772b1d02
8234784a79f77dfa7350d4a0579ffd53cfe7f633
5939 F20101208_AABAPU pasch_j_Page_134thm.jpg
eaa7931a0c8b031a41bc9f9b47c3e93d
d4f807e945687fb147d53508044abbb5a6afaaac
56232 F20101208_AAAZTG pasch_j_Page_061.pro
2b93d2eb74009e854dfb2f70095f6d42
e8f7f207d496cfe147c52a99fdf7c3ddbd4117c2
47513 F20101208_AAAZSR pasch_j_Page_046.pro
36ea8a6de6d34aabd621f3ec4a624a8c
06d794f343d242375036e30ac32bb83ccf075395
18833 F20101208_AABAQJ pasch_j_Page_141.QC.jpg
3995504339f02dac6609baba12e30940
992bab3491e1fd9bc971c3e8d326444ea3a3495b
19120 F20101208_AABAPV pasch_j_Page_134.QC.jpg
398c15c96917e417567d39c208ca771b
9cb33bf9df8e4b8a048d39eb7546df375e22fe0d
54598 F20101208_AAAZSS pasch_j_Page_047.pro
338f47ef62f47a6ec0cd70588971e9f4
52ab5fdc7f107339ce0cb6d73b7a519d04f0655c
6085 F20101208_AABAQK pasch_j_Page_142thm.jpg
b678543e37b4441e073bb6bf64f0ccf5
fd5b051ea92b28c462c501a39abc9434cfcf40af
6371 F20101208_AABAPW pasch_j_Page_135thm.jpg
1ebcbd17cd41189efb2b4dd1135c70d4
f2f5134aa1c1a89a4428c6a808b5d3d7d972a7a2
53248 F20101208_AAAZTH pasch_j_Page_062.pro
44b9729a514024c2f2c375b1b5449cd4
bc47bcf4362e3e0c09844f2836f6df24e9c55b1f
49703 F20101208_AAAZST pasch_j_Page_048.pro
869e789186e168a9e8805362cd9d436b
fc183bd8b9db6a96c27654ce72167bce725fd0ce
19452 F20101208_AABAQL pasch_j_Page_142.QC.jpg
0b28f572daa2c33b3c0d99faf77b134e
215c562219841e1ed4446173e75980f2f323d1de
19923 F20101208_AABAPX pasch_j_Page_135.QC.jpg
011139b9c6e2335a5b5d1ad04e5f7b9b
d35955f6c4901be1f91c7336740dcfde300283d9
45801 F20101208_AAAZTI pasch_j_Page_063.pro
d3265106dd43428edef64e8280e772f9
390e898a58aebe439fb5f1d38291819094a3e8d5
56270 F20101208_AAAZSU pasch_j_Page_049.pro
6213e5ee97f1a0bc03b79bb28e2e1295
b10188208d89f57f53c67c43f171d47d835b8e97
6170 F20101208_AABARA pasch_j_Page_150thm.jpg
f4610b71cea2b4fa31abfe6805313b5b
65be6d1ea028f604ecd520aab6fdccec69aadb9f
6271 F20101208_AABAQM pasch_j_Page_143thm.jpg
286d782008421f17fd05747c628e1e62
5809cb9e78b12039f4f784e41c4f879fba4fbc7a
6345 F20101208_AABAPY pasch_j_Page_136thm.jpg
86727887f8b2ba735b3c5fcd4eb61073
a4251b527f197864ffa8fe24d550b287f5330a87
41463 F20101208_AAAZTJ pasch_j_Page_064.pro
e33aff1a47e08bf92c8a38d19bb17b3f
18084121b749377850ba6c27e37e7cce0aa00187
54770 F20101208_AAAZSV pasch_j_Page_050.pro
3266720cfb15d13a7c6314ab2513fda9
72b84cf635fabc847af3af4c873897d172e098f4
19788 F20101208_AABARB pasch_j_Page_150.QC.jpg
5bd8ed2f56057defd4e9c51b36b0b29c
8b330ec7b8a7dc182c4f8475ecaa474564615a7b
20410 F20101208_AABAQN pasch_j_Page_143.QC.jpg
73f192b9a5da5967f62200718681e673
dea7a3df63fb16dc0eec9895efcb5518b8c79068
20124 F20101208_AABAPZ pasch_j_Page_136.QC.jpg
9ce338d97b340bb3ed6baca2c37d17a7
7b2b46f83f341ceb1c66cf287046959e7546b887
29057 F20101208_AAAZTK pasch_j_Page_065.pro
8ac24fc039e5d66e0b194455129b9ea8
081122cccdce2187bf780faf89e98f7c43bb54ed
55542 F20101208_AAAZSW pasch_j_Page_051.pro
2944b03703528650e0b5129c4a3dc5bb
75adc45d852558ae2a02772d5514b66e4dd8d034
6205 F20101208_AABARC pasch_j_Page_151thm.jpg
f2f08c31049390bb1ec1b2e8051aa353
7821496503cb55e8f69dec48d82e124f1599ac9e
6142 F20101208_AABAQO pasch_j_Page_144thm.jpg
8003d1af0263e12be2c54a5aa89b3278
544d52db03f48ce7bf97b59e5fe4bbec3bd3098b
7809 F20101208_AAAZUA pasch_j_Page_081.pro
e2618793f7fcb46648ab35f95662b5c3
3991831cbcb4cbfca85ac0e1c29c6df241ef945e
39592 F20101208_AAAZTL pasch_j_Page_066.pro
461170710b67af0933a504192094824f
13e42ca78b9da3242be8176d9f1e8f35a74782da
50900 F20101208_AAAZSX pasch_j_Page_052.pro
32ebd3efa71ff4c6c3a3708b1720fd0a
db780802b6103e98acd5eb064e047688fa315686
19867 F20101208_AABARD pasch_j_Page_151.QC.jpg
05e608ebefd7a228632547d52b7225ee
6598e80ef6e25d05f11f0d0e94b0c88a971989cf
20047 F20101208_AABAQP pasch_j_Page_144.QC.jpg
4b669d290b10ccab9eaafa5af122c059
1198115835d4e47b4405770d191986caa95363d7
2731 F20101208_AAAZUB pasch_j_Page_082.pro
60a6f8bd3f82b3531139fe9b4e0a44a1
ff755d591887c620e450d3b5ee35918304aa4b19
54599 F20101208_AAAZTM pasch_j_Page_067.pro
0af2d2282ebdc04643778b18c568c50c
7d6a53085c7279f74424e268b80198da35bc339e
53766 F20101208_AAAZSY pasch_j_Page_053.pro
297b6dab9f1e4b11a5201977ff2b85af
1a6ef018f65836f10886d5b7a5e38404c6692b10
5903 F20101208_AABARE pasch_j_Page_152thm.jpg
518d3edb0f4845bd83a6858f72aef4e1
96fc752e4c82788fdd02cd9021abbe5f24cbbac9
6068 F20101208_AABAQQ pasch_j_Page_145thm.jpg
b0baf6d3c306b6f9115ab697a3b055b9
c5db83999b2730336d85a1725a8a35bbfbbcc6d5
7676 F20101208_AAAZUC pasch_j_Page_083.pro
30dd4e9bdfaa940ae37d4e2ae44313b0
f7b0888e424e1110c2c331846395edfe953b998c
55680 F20101208_AAAZTN pasch_j_Page_068.pro
ffc0aae95488cb972c886e2b41977a0e
4d2cb194bf35084e43767035aec1432116a42269
54415 F20101208_AAAZSZ pasch_j_Page_054.pro
617e744940197b7f13ea96c2238f66dd
a34dff10b86a886756084b2664d4bd973cee4b78
19680 F20101208_AABARF pasch_j_Page_152.QC.jpg
7206d37481e5f43d8c03e83aa7577000
bb640261debb47dd933d06295098ca132b6c4531
19893 F20101208_AABAQR pasch_j_Page_145.QC.jpg
beb6d5e8b2607d9b3b9b6621a32f55ac
38787597dfbf3a7f873d44db56f8f105af761838
19155 F20101208_AAAZUD pasch_j_Page_084.pro
b9aab45b4ae9a6313ce4b41e43c6e8ce
83686c1d387ecab747fdd2ed9b29992fbfb03b97
51761 F20101208_AAAZTO pasch_j_Page_069.pro
e96ab827c1d1e93f7b6f7b59b42f7565
3717824aa1146fb14d4691e78c6b364ef8fe1c43
6316 F20101208_AABARG pasch_j_Page_153thm.jpg
edce94d683dd2fa7019c14bdbebe240f
a7479a6b1d2659babd549e91348ea6d0c39d6d3b
F20101208_AABAQS pasch_j_Page_146thm.jpg
8314c9dedb7bf3ef9a985acc46de3c6d
d5ca69385c9690302f736c18e89c39e03c3f1102
15210 F20101208_AAAZUE pasch_j_Page_085.pro
ded758677d9025c8fbaad377637f8aae
e66d0cad1d678e8edb7fcaa067481fb8f24857e1
31696 F20101208_AAAZTP pasch_j_Page_070.pro
c073e08c6f2894d240d8fbd24fe1dc74
c00742d54971a9c065ec1b700ae0ce270b75fd40
20229 F20101208_AABARH pasch_j_Page_153.QC.jpg
705397a2207256f32f5e282ccd671801
485708e665306d0c171e372c37111a343b9127f8
20002 F20101208_AABAQT pasch_j_Page_146.QC.jpg
aa7ee910dd6bf087d867c7912f114718
d1841b77652b780c1f2095f24897fccdcfedb0d7
10183 F20101208_AAAZUF pasch_j_Page_086.pro
69b5220821d94c4fa9c19b3beff00801
edffd2893f13af7b63e98a15cf6c9b947aecec0c
47467 F20101208_AAAZTQ pasch_j_Page_071.pro
c1a2e9ca3fa6eb11334944ad1e1b9205
49851f1e72c89de90b5502033b54303e3ce6156d
6099 F20101208_AABARI pasch_j_Page_154thm.jpg
0d42f7ce25c143ee3ad6bd064586c0f8
be1705b18ffca9d1c94797cbec753f45da24127a
6201 F20101208_AABAQU pasch_j_Page_147thm.jpg
a4526b82979ac844615536d2d2701081
678526f331abd5b99593c0b4f6346ff49b8f060a
17913 F20101208_AAAZUG pasch_j_Page_087.pro
cdb9b43392db59579e0b3c603fddb3da
1408d6bdc3d5c93ab12a84c0a6b22635b692e85d
49798 F20101208_AAAZTR pasch_j_Page_072.pro
7ede2c77198f1c1935a21859afc0c984
f46843ecab8553c08e0443f2e325643eb0c480b5
20415 F20101208_AABARJ pasch_j_Page_154.QC.jpg
cc11cbd66ac01d0b4caf1e42f96b787d
ce75dd545f5f9545f432d57c4d7502a52c132b60
20427 F20101208_AABAQV pasch_j_Page_147.QC.jpg
cdc71de3d7b161e7a36d5d9f29f9f3b4
efc98ac2db4d51dc038f52b283dde199cd0c1710
12654 F20101208_AAAZUH pasch_j_Page_088.pro
48bc813b1ec551826150e2573cfbd659
d1ca08d14a32464c8bf118ae27507dd626b91da3
38172 F20101208_AAAZTS pasch_j_Page_073.pro
566b58bdaa99f32e1ca9669f62a2d9cb
27b97c25c1f56fba74af845f8ef56ec220ae2ca0
6104 F20101208_AABARK pasch_j_Page_155thm.jpg
6e7733034813b4e6ff54b743687cf01b
373ae64d9ffc1fb31171ec17941081e2d6a0ca31
6313 F20101208_AABAQW pasch_j_Page_148thm.jpg
2bdd03bc8be31de8e5ae66216e538360
9054bd3af9aec0cad08120c86ef84a6cb00ef75b
34098 F20101208_AAAZTT pasch_j_Page_074.pro
5248e68b7fc7831d9bf99bb2f0b97ecd
04a9da7bbe2940c2a82acc4f672642c55b073d73
19921 F20101208_AABARL pasch_j_Page_155.QC.jpg
6fe2cc787f45ee6f91beb091435b499b
fa623fcca1a42f50daa47fa61c30acfe3a2c0aaa
20094 F20101208_AABAQX pasch_j_Page_148.QC.jpg
9c16da1c4c6416ee4f8e5a99f7afc24a
a0262bb744a5f36e000d78020e24d9a5b5a06669
2025 F20101208_AAAZUI pasch_j_Page_089.pro
44541adba46dfde987c848030fc1150c
4dd44f9b8ac8a02d34a2a6ca880b51318beb9cec
54675 F20101208_AAAZTU pasch_j_Page_075.pro
3648761ff2ec4111da1d3341dc84face
e5d7bee8557b698e89d2f49491d90cd4752f2675
6355 F20101208_AABASA pasch_j_Page_163thm.jpg
21ce23657fbad4baaee34e40dac6af0f
00632894b5537b07c3dcbf027008b408c4fb0564
6429 F20101208_AABARM pasch_j_Page_156thm.jpg
ca922e5f42fa4262db5a40b7bf8d0d05
de7b0d98cb15f4d4e94dbea37534784324ec2f4b
6060 F20101208_AABAQY pasch_j_Page_149thm.jpg
214729b748ad64e8504b6431446a26fd
9b344a8c52ac17924c4053ff92260bb78ecaea52
44068 F20101208_AAAZUJ pasch_j_Page_090.pro
506b07f87be7fb8b24c9c7a013ae1fc4
f52b30eacc4137422c5ec7f3d33220c00127a995
45985 F20101208_AAAZTV pasch_j_Page_076.pro
ac0a41972474e658641ab9e9ad18162a
3afc512288afe1dc7fa73ff33493801bd4bbdab0
20500 F20101208_AABASB pasch_j_Page_163.QC.jpg
08dc11c0efcb92041a082f85b3bdb4b2
7e9118f9c54f3dc25e26ffd5be69dc61bd892900
20551 F20101208_AABARN pasch_j_Page_156.QC.jpg
2fe63370ed348e1025e7d21a4c9a795f
8b039671e3fc25883079663a948176edcc81f32a
20066 F20101208_AABAQZ pasch_j_Page_149.QC.jpg
4369592782bf8e377472e190258282d9
56a67c5de1ba0da0bc305c3fd3aeea2f2df96429
54416 F20101208_AAAZUK pasch_j_Page_091.pro
f4759f8ead11c3304248c2a3a66aa26f
6618324a6549b3e9d882845ee32e67b3aca78265
73676 F20101208_AAAZTW pasch_j_Page_077.pro
4a9ee779fbdbd1bbf7e68fa41766b31b
35fa5f96f4e481b6b35ef00bdd694566e0270e04
6259 F20101208_AABASC pasch_j_Page_164thm.jpg
480c7a7eef4c95bec75017c4f1fb06a7
dd1a55995ed440708d47cc31479a0c005447e67d
F20101208_AABARO pasch_j_Page_157thm.jpg
77ecb879bfe020c3395ae16a7c2ff045
54cd511116a925515ac1c0e2312213cc7285aecd
54833 F20101208_AAAZUL pasch_j_Page_092.pro
9e8287655cca94e55c12e943011e2c5b
1e2b9720eb6dfedf80565519714989a9df0e1067
17275 F20101208_AAAZTX pasch_j_Page_078.pro
57e4ac84d6b3af994b31ce765a913175
41f433423e4ad85e01263f8cd32fecd816778e0d
51648 F20101208_AAAZVA pasch_j_Page_107.pro
51e63f005032ce4c3a99d21fa761c947
a61963d133d44901ce3d70934b52f98ba7473398
20373 F20101208_AABASD pasch_j_Page_164.QC.jpg
196937a9630cd5f1b958dba26cf52f6c
9f15ab99216018914d026d0c0b7a8937c87ea4c1
19595 F20101208_AABARP pasch_j_Page_157.QC.jpg
1148e5c43f7918f315045372e7c33732
54048a3e4609616b6a49fb84cc747d8094c62e76
52670 F20101208_AAAZUM pasch_j_Page_093.pro
a47a46f8f9b9c93e624d980ad08c6b12
cd87cd7b7e890ebf715ba1c7707a53771d2df00e
48432 F20101208_AAAZTY pasch_j_Page_079.pro
9873ee937097a0ff7f3b37c82a9a1290
75aa2561e6fb9e516eaeb302e1d35f00f558337b
46760 F20101208_AAAZVB pasch_j_Page_108.pro
b21552bae252ee546316547eed8cf1f3
718bc05cd6841770a36a914f225638627a53d26c
6343 F20101208_AABASE pasch_j_Page_165thm.jpg
d7013f06cbc566038269a2b5d4f4ae5f
bd1f1e0c6159f920871bd42f9cdb332ed31b957c
6159 F20101208_AABARQ pasch_j_Page_158thm.jpg
9e7d43c1aa9034e113506bb005750bb0
29513e1de8a61edaf3d1ab4df65ea41fec4f6e0c
55035 F20101208_AAAZUN pasch_j_Page_094.pro
6e5ba6faa8d0497df32d6723cd095d37
34071f700903814d4fe3c1afc9fef734f544942a
8845 F20101208_AAAZTZ pasch_j_Page_080.pro
056d4a0b7033f2c1f5a703f55d36832c
83211e604fe3078380591fc9f8e072b68c003cc9
52425 F20101208_AAAZVC pasch_j_Page_109.pro
804e7e49c3cb347a4008681beca9ec73
cc6a3000225459dedaf45abefe590d7533ea9371
20846 F20101208_AABASF pasch_j_Page_165.QC.jpg
9c0abfcca18ce65dd05662a57ec813c9
aca4c11d65382da7688f472ed5fb6f237e9af9b1
19914 F20101208_AABARR pasch_j_Page_158.QC.jpg
4921c68ed98f102f7c853c74b9b59ed4
308b469fabd306e127d68548fe90cbad78f100cf
55313 F20101208_AAAZUO pasch_j_Page_095.pro
ba32eb069b6a92ac62538cb5ce7b51ee
4028762fa74bf075a5615a0b273267e861bd06a6
52411 F20101208_AAAZVD pasch_j_Page_110.pro
8f3830f9291181167c07be2cc41a8957
0d2468e8453606180b1363f4327176e920a3bc77
6361 F20101208_AABASG pasch_j_Page_166thm.jpg
3f04d67ba1f5820563ae342604b8d504
af517105d44f6c4a683598e55578822994816288
6177 F20101208_AABARS pasch_j_Page_159thm.jpg
b2bfc422671bfc09a5cbc04d25e28c4e
a2ce9de2032565b5f75cd92280edca1d6a986fcb
51674 F20101208_AAAZUP pasch_j_Page_096.pro
22812dcf1ccbf9e43f16ebb1a1522ee7
4e841b22a4b588809c724a6976760034d5df5538
53281 F20101208_AAAZVE pasch_j_Page_111.pro
9412b1e1ba602a7efe9e51a079b9d7fa
014f9020b9af42216ecbb9fec323ef9b96342a41
20618 F20101208_AABASH pasch_j_Page_166.QC.jpg
e2b96cd65e006eb07b4338037b6c5e5a
7ffa7140df61d53db17793ade6a221ea78bc707e
19845 F20101208_AABART pasch_j_Page_159.QC.jpg
36e76f613330c1e9498417420d48c8fa
208f52a6e8b15a2722162c66bf07f4beed0eed89
45958 F20101208_AAAZUQ pasch_j_Page_097.pro
5f3c883fc9a9a6a50c89d4c8f8058e3d
bb48fb53b46a0297f424895e10689d5372ecaba2
43378 F20101208_AAAZVF pasch_j_Page_112.pro
b4b7ad22ee787039e018837286b228d0
b03625eb7749d811b3137adf325da6d9f89c40cf
6263 F20101208_AABASI pasch_j_Page_167thm.jpg
781930258c4f97ef4566a62a52dbbf33
d3db1dba0d83b5b10bc266aa8c11fda2e01f62ca
6465 F20101208_AABARU pasch_j_Page_160thm.jpg
738f24ceb3eb36036d25cdeb6eeb5f47
7a1ed712f88f0f5477a50a084d2912eb870885bc
29769 F20101208_AAAZUR pasch_j_Page_098.pro
aca7774d2f597a02737102ce64c23547
86f50dfbcefcf3438d302d469af4e9608a43c4e2
58679 F20101208_AAAZVG pasch_j_Page_113.pro
d2ee9d5f26070ac86a9822af1ed38118
95749304be2b15429665e1c4e5de3901738d29e7
18994 F20101208_AABASJ pasch_j_Page_167.QC.jpg
069e3f5bfdc233ea0bbdea6b637444d0
265de6c2dff6a47e0603ba2f23a07ef4c8bc53b5
20986 F20101208_AABARV pasch_j_Page_160.QC.jpg
a73b838838c2203902d2a8cda00cf8a1
1a47eb835c8d2f1eac1b0228ff3e913dc1337627
6534 F20101208_AAAZUS pasch_j_Page_099.pro
50cd1b58e08500a3417c0da15beb8172
51e036ba976af2566d680667faa45e4526f59ab2
52522 F20101208_AAAZVH pasch_j_Page_114.pro
986697dadb6f08d6462ab7c01d13482f
ae1834a57d9ff858b23af5d60d313774479c35ca
7738 F20101208_AABASK pasch_j_Page_168thm.jpg
9b3818b32512fb2a4962202afc060176
505ff01d66f94b3e6045a11cd9b0e9d9c46b39ac
6444 F20101208_AABARW pasch_j_Page_161thm.jpg
0ac60305e2937a968bce9f111fe6c26b
27b9623cc6dcf106d0c9d826e092a43517ef3547
20830 F20101208_AAAZUT pasch_j_Page_100.pro
c8c84c582571160b0549d6af6c3ed3d1
4324f325ddf8f0efd79a40952f0398ac114be5ee
47065 F20101208_AAAZVI pasch_j_Page_115.pro
0ae9ecfa347b0790c85f2d8d1a29aaf3
2f4d3e684a78a090f2658968b0720c58abfdf06d
6995 F20101208_AABATA pasch_j_Page_176thm.jpg
aa76651d97e60430f748978174d661b6
b90d9e9f29e388150f9a3adda1ffd9bfc4879592
31152 F20101208_AABASL pasch_j_Page_168.QC.jpg
efd0f0c39d3c5675b2bfb9d16fb71a6b
e02f917e98416bd78298e4749ff0352e4e07c624
20928 F20101208_AABARX pasch_j_Page_161.QC.jpg
3b0e140c041e336d17d7aebc08dff289
0053d40e917a354482164aed15170016fc29affa
9473 F20101208_AAAZUU pasch_j_Page_101.pro
45e26b241d8185727a8e0d43baaeab7a
866b6746b43456a8a3231785de31338f9429dab5
8737 F20101208_AABASM pasch_j_Page_169thm.jpg
fd4f186c2e5d969bc6dd9d6d2984c221
b1f15f779e926af8b2f4005373d18986d8cf0db0
6540 F20101208_AABARY pasch_j_Page_162thm.jpg
8ac4d20975988c9ec34592d78fc0063b
8ebf12b5b1b7c7cee95b2ef3d8b97f01ad015f3e
11024 F20101208_AAAZUV pasch_j_Page_102.pro
b84ab1f354a812f0b725fea3f364daac
1ed07f37c319637260b1e782fd9f4677ad497608
53432 F20101208_AAAZVJ pasch_j_Page_116.pro
aa6db7d6ca3fc87d6fae66d6cbeca30d
533c24ad19775a0aad11f30577af650ebd067fe5
24168 F20101208_AABATB pasch_j_Page_176.QC.jpg
9b8bf9e86b7d5b48a8003a9055b5fc6d
ffc9bf8f107dc86455aa0404f44a9b4428e6f58c
36967 F20101208_AABASN pasch_j_Page_169.QC.jpg
692fe046b8034254a73245ecbea08a94
ad45f23a77932f3d5ad02d5606f641a21b601530
21198 F20101208_AABARZ pasch_j_Page_162.QC.jpg
0f41d1c4e866b860df2abae03be683bc
f7d5a0f68e1271345004472af1ae2aba6c36e1be
14190 F20101208_AAAZUW pasch_j_Page_103.pro
b719d9c0a10cbd77361468881e848d33
1098297d831260dff42bbdf7fcaf7c605a16c5a7
54806 F20101208_AAAZVK pasch_j_Page_117.pro
30ff0675f5f88ebae7a80458d808c640
d211cfe4cada760d09d740cbdb766fd1ffeb3416
6684 F20101208_AABATC pasch_j_Page_177thm.jpg
17d9c2e4bc08cfeeffa3083983c32818
af468490aa7a1ab1a3e11289fa807d33e1c62aab
8946 F20101208_AABASO pasch_j_Page_170thm.jpg
b0b9578341eaadc69481efa93662c399
d132ff7259bbf4df6860b327acfe135572d02281
9863 F20101208_AAAZUX pasch_j_Page_104.pro
51d975b4d13ded38feba6b2fb753b2e3
860f19e7370a417eda4a173e37bf34b45b3093a9
4851 F20101208_AAAZWA pasch_j_Page_133.pro
b6228125e316c140e657a5fb61f87990
3841dbd183e34d69dfdcc13b729da42e37c336d9
53901 F20101208_AAAZVL pasch_j_Page_118.pro
9c12ae6716c2cca05c3546a0f0800aae
5c331b51e68cb38ef4ce181fd388ea2a65afc4b7
21757 F20101208_AABATD pasch_j_Page_177.QC.jpg
01c1e671bfe0ea8e5ab8a8ce203068c5
4a44c0bd7569d7893d98dd7f354aa9dbbd52acd1
37119 F20101208_AABASP pasch_j_Page_170.QC.jpg
656dc73d4f0ac52aa4ae837bf1e66a80
4f0de1f65f6e38081e5b8c6b363930b7c537cc3a
10145 F20101208_AAAZUY pasch_j_Page_105.pro
e881a993ced9052766e37c9434b8b0c9
4f3ddb8a87c130e39585b8766a3bd508d704d9bc
4766 F20101208_AAAZWB pasch_j_Page_134.pro
83456b3f61b48c6606803f6a1efe301c
128ea22dd3d9001b8c6bf1fafbb0d136381a8ee9
54875 F20101208_AAAZVM pasch_j_Page_119.pro
07dad2806a905c631d47512e79c372db
a87a3b2c238076c740f4b2da1d3e9b80f009273f
7903 F20101208_AABATE pasch_j_Page_178thm.jpg
200e0a84eeb631894106d3eb7d39ae6c
c7d2e7f44f689714ee9c0e37e53fe47e4595cfa7
8767 F20101208_AABASQ pasch_j_Page_171thm.jpg
e9a503e054ab420ee557a6be2fc508dd
2e4bf14c0ed912433c4969382edc48a0a6f1eec1
45381 F20101208_AAAZUZ pasch_j_Page_106.pro
4b75a64ab047de0d5c8ca2a6a5cd35a1
4f4aab2c8d282f3b45bb6bb45414e2273134ac53
6217 F20101208_AAAZWC pasch_j_Page_135.pro
2c851f1cac41efb447d3078ea525dbec
6b16ba6098ae44ec1fdcd970be62e336d86d6689
27073 F20101208_AAAZVN pasch_j_Page_120.pro
ebe39282eb664e16e7fad4ad7f82c35c
0021cd2da494bead7535ef8830916e3e50e76b8d
25554 F20101208_AABATF pasch_j_Page_178.QC.jpg
4c801cfbe1bc138ebd884726095ccf4c
fb0e8b187ef074f302eabba6c269f733fe40c59b
33057 F20101208_AABASR pasch_j_Page_171.QC.jpg
162d3c1445fdfeb9d31ff09292239766
86c17bfb4ec7e2b8174400b99561dd6a400f390a
4358 F20101208_AAAZWD pasch_j_Page_136.pro
17e1fc242698be21c274bc357e4cdd5e
d315318ddb26dba56789792ff5bfb8fa4c638362
17531 F20101208_AAAZVO pasch_j_Page_121.pro
6fc2ccc4de471e284594d21f2c919e96
62bef6412314569e2f51d23c541ab03c2e90bea7
6619 F20101208_AABATG pasch_j_Page_179thm.jpg
917fc15989c49ac4cece4de43a71bb64
09382f749f6c5604a1d9d7b0e961d2b756e588c5
8612 F20101208_AABASS pasch_j_Page_172thm.jpg
8a08ab311d1bdcfdd9997b09fa268b8f
6a20907997ef2cc8a6579791fac7b572429222f3
4131 F20101208_AAAZWE pasch_j_Page_137.pro
73899cb717df9d9f845f19d5a7143342
d6f85cdfd952f603a036d93a71961b342fac87dc
9552 F20101208_AAAZVP pasch_j_Page_122.pro
187f80cd15ec472333ac90adabc98734
fd231e14cee4f8dc6ed326f1f5556802a40b3b69
23085 F20101208_AABATH pasch_j_Page_179.QC.jpg
0da31b457a5433632c93fd331d76fa8c
3a304014f4ecb9d5c31ba5cee4471b5691196b1a
34598 F20101208_AABAST pasch_j_Page_172.QC.jpg
39e98010a177029fc8d865c785539df2
6cf0ac2dee5751c576bf654a99dd1c83ef5a7e92
5527 F20101208_AAAZWF pasch_j_Page_138.pro
d7fbe4e9fd83682b8f1b468048501262
e11ff65ecc497270f4db4294bd10e6f80635d008
F20101208_AAAZVQ pasch_j_Page_123.pro
435e79d20ff6a8ca1462cee16c9b725d
2d2db1143ef15e7cea6f1249a0096e28774854af
8198 F20101208_AABATI pasch_j_Page_180thm.jpg
a2157a91f8411e09b8c08e61494a17de
34646e8b27a22ed7417eb26191d0a7be49e124df
8490 F20101208_AABASU pasch_j_Page_173thm.jpg
944f947d79d8a4a454512d989208a56f
e67c75ac5f0547fd69867288acc8e27a2db4a945
5020 F20101208_AAAZWG pasch_j_Page_139.pro
4e048f4b352e330caf9b5a6245a7280e
0f815eb11964ac0dbc414a8524aa93a03be02336
4780 F20101208_AAAZVR pasch_j_Page_124.pro
e0582da320bdf75070257f2791dd5746
4bb2fbb577b8066909c501cb30501927fc1933c0
33779 F20101208_AABATJ pasch_j_Page_180.QC.jpg
54a3cb35eddcab80cd8571a0a31f6d01
41464572f07a82da06b88092ac3348162a3577a3
35190 F20101208_AABASV pasch_j_Page_173.QC.jpg
c4eb61eebcfb2cd79827ffe327bbb443
38cb292264c1c837286dad993a612f702257129d
3516 F20101208_AAAZWH pasch_j_Page_140.pro
b58e223931a7485bc56b544895e6dac6
a5c6488df7e6386cca3c36a6c94d675da01bcd1b
5085 F20101208_AAAZVS pasch_j_Page_125.pro
bbee636d74e52906b9440a334157140f
484603e3472b765112029a5723a25241a064c8e6
7978 F20101208_AABATK pasch_j_Page_181thm.jpg
58b83a6c3d9ae6832dfce0466e97dcc9
1722f6b5691562247b040507ef894e5111b877be
8132 F20101208_AABASW pasch_j_Page_174thm.jpg
47137047153087fa2a0bbc1d9068066a
e3fa3d66711107b5a8678a38a0d351f7c418a85e
3326 F20101208_AAAZWI pasch_j_Page_141.pro
a7a5363be7acd22ff8ad72e4850e1661
28015ff97604aebfa438cc804b89338f06b77842
5067 F20101208_AAAZVT pasch_j_Page_126.pro
fd0d35778c79c0c573b12b2315c03110
0cba0939d25c4504041a28931499ab1d6a0bb790
9025 F20101208_AABAUA pasch_j_Page_189thm.jpg
b9521088d68cd39db48c674e2e0801e3
253d2b851f96b26ca7e14865bcaadbd15f55e432
31934 F20101208_AABATL pasch_j_Page_181.QC.jpg
1cde8f8ec6e8a73bdada946ff4a72bc4
cb096c822299018acf4bc7ce3f866832ec78ffeb
33195 F20101208_AABASX pasch_j_Page_174.QC.jpg
469d421a60f97b75295abaaf09bb1690
aaa254070eaefbd476a688c6c3ce9eaacf6dac85
4090 F20101208_AAAZWJ pasch_j_Page_142.pro
0c07689474b5b1d088378c39bc9348b8
9f30014e743b23bea3e11484a1f4fb78e2ac48c0
4559 F20101208_AAAZVU pasch_j_Page_127.pro
e31818f11776c7443043a23f61475bb9
d313c48c446239bb79aae522e41654e49b4eab68
36783 F20101208_AABAUB pasch_j_Page_189.QC.jpg
507f1431628ea8a1fcd62e2cf2a519d8
cdbda07a2748f6fed2f7d1b49fcc744c715ac3a5
8417 F20101208_AABATM pasch_j_Page_182thm.jpg
7363f4b8c257a9260d424b3b5adf6e66
5032fddb2c078d5ad4b845855b6e1a71b0716a48
4494 F20101208_AABASY pasch_j_Page_175thm.jpg
3c459a33dcd1b3a516a40ced7f94e7e0
7929b9c2951114a24fc9eb9dbef47615bd45c115
5123 F20101208_AAAZVV pasch_j_Page_128.pro
443d40aedaf20841ef0a40adea4ae9d7
c859ba01e16b6ed7ce93fbfef1fac6368fd8efc9
34239 F20101208_AABATN pasch_j_Page_182.QC.jpg
8706917648ecd6c23f96664a9a02290f
e33b281e7c4dda831cf96e465c0bcecc7feadcff
18273 F20101208_AABASZ pasch_j_Page_175.QC.jpg
2f32689c8f720f906226dbb390349dc9
beea2bcc0d141a0b96333c02176ecacf79e8934a
2855 F20101208_AAAZWK pasch_j_Page_143.pro
745b50edb0b9e2b4d9e3e4f9af996735
a9dcb6c619b873b9e69ef5d1230fd64ab710ba06
4600 F20101208_AAAZVW pasch_j_Page_129.pro
337eef5f075f53dd45eae1a754ba9987
f6104a0c37d0d25a3220a7e8426e630043f83495
3827 F20101208_AABAUC pasch_j_Page_190thm.jpg
e4d8ac8ebe232203a9364d9f10187fda
14807edee18e0ba1c85ceab8a9973b7374aa9dcb
946 F20101208_AABATO pasch_j_Page_183thm.jpg
b8e2ba0230e922e5acc75b46b171ec8c
2f4ff88a4e8ee17389b8217e8c8e3e31d1ee060f
3316 F20101208_AAAZXA pasch_j_Page_159.pro
f0d231e74b66b72a4829b557cd06533b
b51619fe38fbf405db42928d4a2dc1615a4a7efd
4045 F20101208_AAAZWL pasch_j_Page_144.pro
ef603507fa0f96098ef42e230fa4364a
accc4c3131f3af06e30cc1b800793476e595e65c
6999 F20101208_AAAZVX pasch_j_Page_130.pro
bc2e7f70b638898a78bacbedefa47ea3
36070362d11b518c51e169ed0ba34a9959f44deb
14846 F20101208_AABAUD pasch_j_Page_190.QC.jpg
8a9085c4d9ee76c66c84f9e30a6aa172
7c7bb4904af10dd5fe5a3af10ba37f17c319a562
3300 F20101208_AABATP pasch_j_Page_183.QC.jpg
cbf8e50a89710300427d39c1f896ba78
2ec9317df891d68805f718ef948a56a54f47c425
4177 F20101208_AAAZXB pasch_j_Page_160.pro
cd9653987ab39eb8281403aab8c064e7
30d461d5f71c698d81087914e08824b63bd04651
4468 F20101208_AAAZWM pasch_j_Page_145.pro
22dbcd646536f28311916a5e70332cde
bec127af2f9e6b950790ad57f28371fbbe1ccef9
3951 F20101208_AAAZVY pasch_j_Page_131.pro
cca5402e9e36bf1ab10bcabe1d4a66c6
8798bf36de1d7926bedf5a27cd9cfd1418a1526e
217405 F20101208_AABAUE UFE0017524_00001.mets FULL
dfbe1adc439879add10959f6a28cd24c
ca43f25c301d6ed07444b13280c9e46228e11265
8593 F20101208_AABATQ pasch_j_Page_184thm.jpg
021f52bc190cd004c6ecddab3af78fc2
dd3c94007d00cc0ce323ad441752806ebe0f9f0f
3940 F20101208_AAAZXC pasch_j_Page_161.pro
ffb2cbea607db235baafd84b2523b621
1c3aa614eb29028226e5585cf00349d6d5e7fafe
3816 F20101208_AAAZWN pasch_j_Page_146.pro
ff182ee895d48eb1aeaa364569085f29
648f7a67734bdf2479819c050b13de8809b556bd
3767 F20101208_AAAZVZ pasch_j_Page_132.pro
4538dc6e519b3dbac7b424da9b3246b2
84e43691f829961278f71e967773eaf2a151c4b3
34356 F20101208_AABATR pasch_j_Page_184.QC.jpg
24d3128a1334d50466467ff5d43d5c23
66a5a470b287304033a7881cd80f302543156e12
4190 F20101208_AAAZXD pasch_j_Page_162.pro
2160d968d7a53e3419d61d20b1c85d38
bca7e0519d3026f1f9bba22e13d39e3cbd4ebe2b
2830 F20101208_AAAZWO pasch_j_Page_147.pro
3e62b1eeba98f2232f96ff2446074c74
598948f1e8d1583020dc7c4ba06a63f87a27558c
8774 F20101208_AABATS pasch_j_Page_185thm.jpg
3fa9d152cdd7577433b20ca3d802ae71
0f19bd0fe1bee83c977065e00ec16afba99b831d
4053 F20101208_AAAZXE pasch_j_Page_163.pro
b9b9c5e4111023540162244ced0087f1
3394a6496d6ce0988041b10f441d0c2e58a00c56
4313 F20101208_AAAZWP pasch_j_Page_148.pro
f77f58c8dcdb32e10043d68d4bde52f4
be9da74f69080b6ad29081f47ff968c86cea9e9b
34717 F20101208_AABATT pasch_j_Page_185.QC.jpg
2a1dc8c40cc6ace7835f16b7436ae519
454bcf6045cbb828699da90de8e270cb2436e610
3372 F20101208_AAAZXF pasch_j_Page_164.pro
fb792c1dd1554e90ebb6a641acae1f6b
ce324c2f2c01445943ac2fd3544969219f218abc
3660 F20101208_AAAZWQ pasch_j_Page_149.pro
64beaa3b23d7d15574df8c3f06aa7e0f
ebb867258ef49a02299a68a845c6698782a70686
9240 F20101208_AABATU pasch_j_Page_186thm.jpg
e9231edd80d412e4a61483a195f106e6
2b3b2b39a0df859bbdbe73385f066fa80953d01f
3344 F20101208_AAAZXG pasch_j_Page_165.pro
da14900a675a09556c2de7a7d9b8820c
67e089317603209cae94d97989137391c757f646
4355 F20101208_AAAZWR pasch_j_Page_150.pro
eafa34ddb8e0b9f12e1d35255bbdebb5
72bbbefddc06a713090b4f03bb6d37e582e15c43
38598 F20101208_AABATV pasch_j_Page_186.QC.jpg
6438bee9069f19b79a443f595ffed2e8
f6ae8708957bc578e3455b80cfc5b22cdfbbaa91
6550 F20101208_AAAZXH pasch_j_Page_166.pro
cad636f78f8ba9fb9d06881b31946865
c9e621e2c27000afda79f8afa73da5628122c75d
3611 F20101208_AAAZWS pasch_j_Page_151.pro
e09822174d3189406c0754d60186ba13
3618fe0f63d4bbd6fff0959cbbde97a91b2c42f5
9534 F20101208_AABATW pasch_j_Page_187thm.jpg
c65cfacae51d65ed13ff762a5fe59e09
dc5093bd17d0e066af5ff666e3b70dfcc664a497
5795 F20101208_AAAZXI pasch_j_Page_167.pro
a2f2a36155d3235a6bbc71f14f28cfa8
314ea04d62a90b577af6891edb382dfed3018c49
3028 F20101208_AAAZWT pasch_j_Page_152.pro
68ae61e599821cc7f830a1adf37cb871
d826d057cd8ad56cbdf3f27d9825fdbe10813530
55211 F20101208_AAAZAA pasch_j_Page_130.jpg
76056f7324d33ef04c27c43de5d1f847
ef4fb04f4662340a4c05f7fd467f81e2ffbdf2cc
38400 F20101208_AABATX pasch_j_Page_187.QC.jpg
7696baff6bd34f27c9ff0622107aed65
32e92ed7b5cc7684cefd08b03c83180ff0a6ff2d
4735 F20101208_AAAZWU pasch_j_Page_153.pro
fb20091a4984154598db15246d3bc967
b3909ae03691df950d11db37135cde649e49f554
54491 F20101208_AAAZAB pasch_j_Page_131.jpg
7ceff159871cc85cf8a5f4a9ef1bb03b
94a2be395912443bcc04ae00b15931e8defddaa3
46442 F20101208_AAAZXJ pasch_j_Page_168.pro
bfb94ee49cf7d0e909d2bc35d11584b6
f26763593673ac1c24a56595d9de051e36bd79f7
9215 F20101208_AABATY pasch_j_Page_188thm.jpg
063c8acf0aba7c80d678061a1124ae9e
436e815e7f1849d95370af201fef78c8d1acdb8a
F20101208_AAAZWV pasch_j_Page_154.pro
cf5b47a602a9ec61e688a54700b3f1fc
4f2db1dbf8b682ee8dd141ef8aa3e5228cf5f8d4
55213 F20101208_AAAZAC pasch_j_Page_132.jpg
4b0db164cc571de286180b855a1627e3
908d960a2fe55ccf2408686ec8c2e20f8577bebe
55638 F20101208_AAAZXK pasch_j_Page_169.pro
bd308025e91456faaeb000fdc6480ea6
5796e02b582a98255ecf7297fedec8bfcf543d06
35837 F20101208_AABATZ pasch_j_Page_188.QC.jpg
3ae2d00a2c4a1a1f269c02b483f05ef1
098c6a562da9da754e5e080996d83be71198493c
4320 F20101208_AAAZWW pasch_j_Page_155.pro
c7c851c312ff6f9e594652036ba07dd5
583309ece260d4d7c23891f76ab891277004f6aa
56088 F20101208_AAAZAD pasch_j_Page_133.jpg
4a5ca17091710ddf8d80d05c2600072f
ef234e39c1c06b7a661652b0844df5840d4c6d34
4625 F20101208_AAAZWX pasch_j_Page_156.pro
b83331a0eeecfa981127507416bd2780
b7d2d4ad8956d8032f379b9b0c936c49e6daf71a
54723 F20101208_AAAZAE pasch_j_Page_134.jpg
9122b7cfc125ba67e1568dfe9f2222de
792acdc29be97be844ad7ab8f36412c98150374b
59443 F20101208_AAAZYA pasch_j_Page_185.pro
93ed69783698fc8c52f9e911b0cd0326
ec8e636090b73f193a5dbec1093a2d401934f85e
55262 F20101208_AAAZXL pasch_j_Page_170.pro
09830cb19d7e93dfd7a25bbe66ac1b8d
e418788ff0f2fb78607c03073a69e11567962410
5173 F20101208_AAAZWY pasch_j_Page_157.pro
447c602d060d0a2ad14b18a3840522bc
6d97d01dd600f6a7cb92f4e4bfbb795077251a2f
56151 F20101208_AAAZAF pasch_j_Page_135.jpg
0b1af22fde82fd351d331dbcf843412c
9de0c34c7ae69f725be9a89eb65c2c59ef8a1ad4
66878 F20101208_AAAZYB pasch_j_Page_186.pro
35f49c18a03d3e15c16dbb6f74929116
4bca479951a0a64abb3be804ca102dbb67bc0d4c
51857 F20101208_AAAZXM pasch_j_Page_171.pro
0dd646a9baf0ad9922fc16594b652d42
17ed157d3eb76e1f89eaca6c57cd7920a167ece2
3408 F20101208_AAAZWZ pasch_j_Page_158.pro
59defbe072c9d47a5b8cc455abd53f19
ea38cb44b3602130f0f7e1212f4cd294eb8d64f0
56917 F20101208_AAAZAG pasch_j_Page_136.jpg
470e2b45b9b7e1a928f5cd8211fcd0b8
623e1463237a562d55524943a32bb02b988362c5
69400 F20101208_AAAZYC pasch_j_Page_187.pro
e3997540e5c1e2471afa5130cd200d3d
3d6709b431a052479a00c3e735c7f7753d852c9f
51819 F20101208_AAAZXN pasch_j_Page_172.pro
232324cf4f38b71c2843cad2c3b6f9c6
eb410ae2bd6d2e4adf3b1493a589ab20fe0112e9
55598 F20101208_AAAZAH pasch_j_Page_137.jpg
27a9226b32d3a19410d145fac13e54d4
f8a94c672413360d8e7bf9667e7c32ce42eda696
62537 F20101208_AAAZYD pasch_j_Page_188.pro
eeb5d6d88f83621949615c15633772a3
13a328972d33db0fd8f3aa989fc4191ab28caf81
51762 F20101208_AAAZXO pasch_j_Page_173.pro
4c2ae2a8f9066afc6542da1d5b996db0
5b30a4349e58d75bdb9698e77d39a04b52e7c346
54580 F20101208_AAAZAI pasch_j_Page_138.jpg
f6d92444acd82c56abc514008ca940b2
127a465c26708f1fa450d92e3b3b3c21a6ab4826
23540 F20101208_AAAYVC pasch_j_Page_001.jpg
dfba2b9130f187241800370c5204f3c3
b3c299d8c53adceed5ee76cb99d251f440894a07
61787 F20101208_AAAZYE pasch_j_Page_189.pro
1d92bd25d6522a8c20c1c8e32212a6bc
f5f785033cacf8bcce683e48d478fe0c11dde6d4
49531 F20101208_AAAZXP pasch_j_Page_174.pro
c508f7447b673d9f531b7adf835a0725
1cc723cbde5e439adeb2bb72e1297d53b1afb149
56728 F20101208_AAAZAJ pasch_j_Page_139.jpg
47662c0729115275379393738d5016b4
988da264730bdb9dd3a7b36eab59c03bdc05a2ee
4571 F20101208_AAAYVD pasch_j_Page_002.jpg
69e256934c0440feee39156411570259
46d7f9289ec2a846499f8e71b3dc4b0c9eb6037c
20621 F20101208_AAAZYF pasch_j_Page_190.pro
ac3e9c69a6fa55d71c6c88ae52a108b9
c6d7c46291c0a94086df9c6a880df5388c0353b5
25836 F20101208_AAAZXQ pasch_j_Page_175.pro
a681bdb67018b2cb5b229e7944fa7771
91ce8dc7c18433a69d993ae008b297f5913e45e9
55892 F20101208_AAAZAK pasch_j_Page_140.jpg
648098f49672398dd842df5c3d1936c2
04d586f2071f260e9963ae90f7a539ced7bcbfd6
17996 F20101208_AAAYVE pasch_j_Page_003.jpg
fdb6183c47b0afff9ab4adf6666dcd27
7bd4620966fb473be63c124583feed62ff5bb5d5
445 F20101208_AAAZYG pasch_j_Page_001.txt
d8f1ea0afaf7f9086c0cddc211a09ba6
10f25ea6e4caf23d8fd83c1bc1828514075133c0
25018 F20101208_AAAZXR pasch_j_Page_176.pro
b289bd8d3e6f9b3ebe07e45d701d6d36
96628609c1432e1f14cd8d3a14de5f262b24fecf
52545 F20101208_AAAZAL pasch_j_Page_141.jpg
40cfa5d1ae15f6326472446cc3680afd
aa59ed0b0664a6a7f6441aa9a07433d1a9aefedb
42444 F20101208_AAAYVF pasch_j_Page_004.jpg
6f8edf0edd95d1cd3d6671bdf76a04ac
67304426c2b7e2f5a8074b84d55a40d73495edb4
106 F20101208_AAAZYH pasch_j_Page_002.txt
980574cbbc7495f9387e803650381752
04632a2f197bdf864092b55d5d38d4310d2c8123
10847 F20101208_AAAZXS pasch_j_Page_177.pro
7d0b4ff7972e755e752c848e00adb284
1c17b7e57482d3f793b4980367c3ee59782d8a3b
54374 F20101208_AAAZAM pasch_j_Page_142.jpg
cb40911e5a98c72c1ee2769843db5300
81fffeda20832af919a9a679d7a3907af3ca156d
114951 F20101208_AAAYVG pasch_j_Page_005.jpg
66f9a0c2906b5d08ee5180fd122c3511
efd2ddf5f477d319ec9f05688d2c892cb77a90b4
401 F20101208_AAAZYI pasch_j_Page_003.txt
e1e65e478ad8e15871690127a3dd9d64
d929e751bb4587a493bc0870e4044ef93fa3fe0f
10371 F20101208_AAAZXT pasch_j_Page_178.pro
96c8ef3486ec8c6bf41e489367943d21
8fa0518d0e1647e25d4f22134594ba367bfcbd43
58163 F20101208_AAAZBA pasch_j_Page_156.jpg
5944f0053a7f2805fff8cafc176e7b92
4f1790191fda05e1e4c1975182841f9095e53aaf
57283 F20101208_AAAZAN pasch_j_Page_143.jpg
6f9eacd9cee693755539e1dda367de53
5785a5a2c30547bc515cf755ba8f25fcba29b2f7
131465 F20101208_AAAYVH pasch_j_Page_006.jpg
8a0a9e535c67140f46e5fb2be29269c3
0773b622763ce441febe0fa18ac3acea1dba9a45
799 F20101208_AAAZYJ pasch_j_Page_004.txt
17e83781c021b43de4c83617771e7e97
9e5bbe793b8ca4b2e88ce3064464853e6da48b49
7286 F20101208_AAAZXU pasch_j_Page_179.pro
ff19ee84669362c9611e7a9a1659e1a0
eb1f2c0cdb394198a405fe81f541884cafb7d723
55489 F20101208_AAAZBB pasch_j_Page_157.jpg
f0348859a9ea30806942c4d17e7a7181
cb6c7bfc28ba046f2b068ba73e1c3f0675a1631f
56953 F20101208_AAAZAO pasch_j_Page_144.jpg
dc49ed3a64f0baceb47673b471cab861
9990200043b4ff3fdda68f64ba279d5e49d46616
62707 F20101208_AAAYVI pasch_j_Page_007.jpg
7a49822ffb3d5b33b6d93bde15c79f06
d5a48ac77593f92995a7500ab772095dc37bc870
3051 F20101208_AAAZYK pasch_j_Page_005.txt
7b57698b98c5879b600149f8e20805f8
cfaeb1c52c75c36e492c82d18895e072eaead5db
50551 F20101208_AAAZXV pasch_j_Page_180.pro
576cb2f7b133e08eb22b2e6216f115c2
9233af0566577d8d3c22e979083a05e23873a515
55386 F20101208_AAAZBC pasch_j_Page_158.jpg
4e4fbabf6945cf6209f898e6357e795d
5ab205e0ea0008bee4cdb244e597699211babff0
56246 F20101208_AAAZAP pasch_j_Page_145.jpg
8bb7dad5fc61f018543a3fd98ee03d6c
0b8fef5ea1deca0c27d83394600aec7e511e541a
117399 F20101208_AAAYVJ pasch_j_Page_008.jpg
5d4f2cfeaf971469dfca95a8b4d1be13
a9b360069716cb670ee13bbcd5d19619ad3ff282
3398 F20101208_AAAZYL pasch_j_Page_006.txt
68b159d55e3adb9f859a3465b3eb5479
277ebf07737d99d6215cf3f397694d88e0875358
47951 F20101208_AAAZXW pasch_j_Page_181.pro
5200110b81d3e3ff8b52f4f3e370d7a4
19061ef407130478fd604ed05fe3a25d160c365e
56293 F20101208_AAAZBD pasch_j_Page_159.jpg
48833660ae620ab7369d8ed527477a4c
e5979cd7b8f722d900abf8f394d25ba79458c87e
56675 F20101208_AAAZAQ pasch_j_Page_146.jpg
3977cac7ebb5bf882a85478d947b8972
4120eed654d3cd976a385f691045e5bd92a25f20
1775 F20101208_AAAZZA pasch_j_Page_021.txt
bd1f0a328477fc41a575fc31f91c1b78
d0b2e27dc872b850fca9388fadd5035e67076adb
51781 F20101208_AAAZXX pasch_j_Page_182.pro
4637acec2b6bc54e9119f712b59202f2
678d220c02d5f2fd24672bd66f9343905041e3e4
58324 F20101208_AAAZBE pasch_j_Page_160.jpg
ee60029c1a3aba17b221c352331cfda3
915948c4d8f4aa599c472a33e4013842c4b61573
57721 F20101208_AAAZAR pasch_j_Page_147.jpg
a40418175e9f5f3f2d81e5fad73bfbdf
49b2107c8f96fcaaf97b73ac6c9ce59bd3361132
1852 F20101208_AAAZZB pasch_j_Page_022.txt
6acf29179c18b975665c61831d5029ab
a19f9647e8268f5b958439bd871b30d2aced0ecf
118668 F20101208_AAAYVK pasch_j_Page_009.jpg
167f07807d1f2cfd7424466af478ed61
e41e8fa74157f207f5633f925c25eba2abdc7653
1197 F20101208_AAAZYM pasch_j_Page_007.txt
2cb636f79692ce8879de13f29a359465
20cee2641cb0badb68863d9022dc47fbad944b66
28480 F20101208_AAAYUW pasch_j_Page_031.QC.jpg
c18007d9b2272b75a73e21d360fc1d93
f0611e84f191a7e4547e327133bc78d52c4fc74b
3053 F20101208_AAAZXY pasch_j_Page_183.pro
1db8629eb1b56bb8516c6d6cae0b0573
aaec2cddc57aba457657471a4792885bb198ff06
58663 F20101208_AAAZBF pasch_j_Page_161.jpg
94c2b6ecaaa9235befd4a329b37729b3
27a5a72c70ef79ab709133037bd2268b053c196e
1905 F20101208_AAAZZC pasch_j_Page_023.txt
8c5bf4337d08b77cba059075f5a57454
2e2aa6a069246bf8bf3dd90c9a1a17d0d74b8061
55804 F20101208_AAAYWA pasch_j_Page_025.jpg
ecf9e8d323be117eb838117bbc253e06
13a525acb7b068bdc7d3eab7d19cda05014c96e9
F20101208_AAAZAS pasch_j_Page_148.jpg
e91d3046670af4e71c609b9640510ec6
41cb07cd9047c08e1209fc7f79027fa88b61ece5
117447 F20101208_AAAYVL pasch_j_Page_010.jpg
cee305b15adab78e616743000eb88992
17ff696d5cacc9a0d03cf20a0f6f29d45f2415a0
2391 F20101208_AAAZYN pasch_j_Page_008.txt
bc679215e63d61af32db502061469ccd
064d30af61c6eef5c84d5412c4bf9d2636f72200
66693 F20101208_AAAYUX pasch_j_Page_065.jp2
0eb609ed7bba9607644286d618e4365f
ab62f40e602b45fd9bb66740217543d5c3bc59e6
57820 F20101208_AAAZXZ pasch_j_Page_184.pro
0e444722b99f611a2d09aed5b0c619df
b4643a6b4cc8974cf02a83830a56b51a03eaeee0
58780 F20101208_AAAZBG pasch_j_Page_162.jpg
699a8f5f83414e2f3f7272a6a4b6b196
9f3b742ae6f57e8cca77b212a1b7eb00f844c5b5
1256 F20101208_AAAZZD pasch_j_Page_024.txt
89ecc5e52b4da8ae28fcf27d7b3a2ef9
cc029517a8777a34da8ce16129743caf63c7b093
71118 F20101208_AAAYWB pasch_j_Page_026.jpg
53936cd7cb3d718f717710d8871a396d
7614dbce0e8abd2903c957025ed9f022ee1a9a5b
55338 F20101208_AAAZAT pasch_j_Page_149.jpg
0cda0f609c2571d3f16482e1496df27a
2fa724f613e9ae5bda90570e629e9c35379180f7
33279 F20101208_AAAYVM pasch_j_Page_011.jpg
f8f0c3609e7148b28fc5131dada1fbbf
d7b57a02dc357358045906674b3a66363f1ad2fe
2683 F20101208_AAAZYO pasch_j_Page_009.txt
9c85c151e46919e8ae664be79c1f4531
a5f26a8607be6ad0adb3eb6409c4328e2109f37d
104196 F20101208_AAAYUY pasch_j_Page_107.jpg
1eea864d11c92d097bcadfaee02aba25
6e01993a2ec0cb155397745462f0968a7f682ca0
57494 F20101208_AAAZBH pasch_j_Page_163.jpg
d43eef441ecd0688113163609f8e3b68
495ba9f24811f28b9fcf69b5019c9ed7710b501b
1310 F20101208_AAAZZE pasch_j_Page_025.txt
c81ad9b5d52701579c4c131338acabe4
5ea9d68a215b1682db0c13b35a71b34ba8826b4c
84004 F20101208_AAAYWC pasch_j_Page_027.jpg
7700ff7b0c17341590d92a8e23a50232
b12412cc4c56ea3f14c1b47af15fbbd74679a9ae
35930 F20101208_AAAYVN pasch_j_Page_012.jpg
f318f2c700c3171d8f695d4b841cd016
22016e73f894d106d7291d4fe4a36a3b0b16c771
2603 F20101208_AAAZYP pasch_j_Page_010.txt
8a69c5ea2fab74b521e547f7c542e9b6
e1043ac44840eee1f899b77dd4364597313aca05
281581 F20101208_AAAYUZ UFE0017524_00001.xml
362731e42f014ba8b0834d71cb1479f0
3336ad45f3b92b556021e30ad7bf5d499af64dfc
57725 F20101208_AAAZBI pasch_j_Page_164.jpg
5a80ffea33a7511d0410154fa40ef880
814fe018b42ec34b51f51158f7fa897655d1600c
1450 F20101208_AAAZZF pasch_j_Page_026.txt
82347e3168e7e41ca480052fb6d3546a
92467d0fd50b7338986ffb56c31ca2f4be1c1c60
89406 F20101208_AAAYWD pasch_j_Page_028.jpg
d3a8b45aee603ba1e9d60b89d868bb68
5efa8ec65ced638f1ec6838c7c2a53c0f1cdd825
55926 F20101208_AAAZAU pasch_j_Page_150.jpg
343e1b0f78c87fc757083f2f076f65af
41c56d3b740f340f29be1b29d7a040685fe7cd55
33399 F20101208_AAAYVO pasch_j_Page_013.jpg
15d334682a0ce9478a1e9fe1a89e9b5c
5b14907c6e299ec3edf1c846606defb4fe3119de
529 F20101208_AAAZYQ pasch_j_Page_011.txt
830d093a6357f707cab6568bb6220f8b
3be3ec47e1c00e0fd6645c61db1c562338bb6fb2
58837 F20101208_AAAZBJ pasch_j_Page_165.jpg
11e0f402fd264d74b4e7c86f85da9d7d
4e70a871517750426fc086ce92aaa0be987c2792
1677 F20101208_AAAZZG pasch_j_Page_027.txt
86ec36cb9c23b7506ed69be8da28cbec
04ab8e69032066a546aad43b2ef53e4dfd930705
66391 F20101208_AAAYWE pasch_j_Page_029.jpg
4b67251ce71b2b153a875fdc345dbf31
9beaad66a2efe672762e9a0d7d14bc646d887d7f
56531 F20101208_AAAZAV pasch_j_Page_151.jpg
8aae697fcb0b06429016e20bf50ecfa8
5e34a8734b3ae495750b1fd1f6185f156f7aaa9a
23901 F20101208_AAAYVP pasch_j_Page_014.jpg
518385fb15f4139d815796b67ab6e5aa
44a9e48eef4efdf71e7c149c27c2e5d5d8ddc1d7
660 F20101208_AAAZYR pasch_j_Page_012.txt
42f5f33ca45e8627e8faf19ac58cc59b
aa7d48ee0d71904d143df3cd5a8a5eb2864273d2
57996 F20101208_AAAZBK pasch_j_Page_166.jpg
da07c9368aa3bab976314efef7871fcc
11243462fb3b79518e5bd55a41952e38c12a5c0a
1694 F20101208_AAAZZH pasch_j_Page_028.txt
c2b4789adbbcd14e35d196624fe6c74c
e63706dbba856f0f71ace59092323763bfb9a73d
79122 F20101208_AAAYWF pasch_j_Page_030.jpg
3d1ae30b66db232f0efa1b4121c39491
cf4ae12e51dcae342ce96e6e2988471dd33cc98d
55992 F20101208_AAAZAW pasch_j_Page_152.jpg
7d46eb441c57187bab33c6446211b2c8
c589ee936aaa7c701367386a7fa0bb0b9af23030
28239 F20101208_AAAYVQ pasch_j_Page_015.jpg
71eac3da906729338bda204199a6faa9
f2deb61ad0b225cb93b4dcafa89b9940133bad5d
612 F20101208_AAAZYS pasch_j_Page_013.txt
8c46a72b3573a3ab6f6a25440e1b7dd9
af0d288258356e22964ab5e3d4b16692f1cb462e
F20101208_AAAZBL pasch_j_Page_167.jpg
3ea595880f5f2828fa35a0e12298780c
47794406e57c602f124296ae5b448d4459cbf4ad
1449 F20101208_AAAZZI pasch_j_Page_029.txt
5890834a5370fe408bc79aaba6ab1249
e82f1762437aed97403e6a025cb41bba4179bc8e
90570 F20101208_AAAYWG pasch_j_Page_031.jpg
c1902157edb083b4df6a3b9425bf51e4
df54db08ec9d3117c60fa802ec3fa7417b9b428d
56950 F20101208_AAAZAX pasch_j_Page_153.jpg
1e04e696f0baa51cff3d7d7aa4c67505
f3cc1e121d67d3337dd122b01fcb9bfda7e0066d
93037 F20101208_AAAYVR pasch_j_Page_016.jpg
654d57e22b936066b8db9d1c3d11a98c
16fa1d08c086edd26d0ccdaf3d5396f4600b2f15
437 F20101208_AAAZYT pasch_j_Page_014.txt
7b0590bedd3f561a6b6f752f2f0e1954
52c5fdf959f53c33dea80f2d78e1c522b6fdc374
103731 F20101208_AAAZCA pasch_j_Page_182.jpg
361a4e78fb844de03b81a25d6ee33361
a421e9d136313341f367f33889553f71fd874aab
95738 F20101208_AAAZBM pasch_j_Page_168.jpg
1a93e9450f2c33e8f910fb9ec46e314c
e8b762a426159b56f4c81772de1bddc19248c921
1569 F20101208_AAAZZJ pasch_j_Page_030.txt
56375ce94615aa170274aafe095becc1
375e1f456edfa2293e99797d2d793ea298606ebb
109492 F20101208_AAAYWH pasch_j_Page_032.jpg
f12a04c95a63661f0051cdb934d25481
495fb0fd43640bc983711d6590b1c87be2af5b3a
56484 F20101208_AAAZAY pasch_j_Page_154.jpg
2e5aa80a77a866081d7f75abce7cbb2f
8f577d4c92e363eb53868c16b88afaf0925c92d6
48313 F20101208_AAAYVS pasch_j_Page_017.jpg
2118a7b60c378b965cfbb8c24e9132a8
02308322a1b7e66e1b78835f5564494651c56434
535 F20101208_AAAZYU pasch_j_Page_015.txt
ee04de1ff7809b5c91bd19e8942924eb
11d714134331a52e52bec604cc76611c2c114312
8696 F20101208_AAAZCB pasch_j_Page_183.jpg
6fc5438aa54b975ec7598c87801691af
95a69e28756b0422250d2223d105d26a6adea1c6
111838 F20101208_AAAZBN pasch_j_Page_169.jpg
bf8bec857bec468bc70cc25b2e30c6aa
e54836f72bc84a5c74c0d0affbfd4cd3aa4dd2c5
1843 F20101208_AAAZZK pasch_j_Page_031.txt
8388d87c917224ebdbe27673b9811a5d
59abdef1ecf3dc3fed4825d6ccc8138289844f56
114752 F20101208_AAAYWI pasch_j_Page_033.jpg
2cc7cb45bc3841a12816bac8b7f6f579
b7c8e509d69e212276152f0b009d98183a0037e8
56291 F20101208_AAAZAZ pasch_j_Page_155.jpg
880b84831149b2985d91dd41c6824faf
b10d8240b2d9f629f0b1f1dcf9e7176f51351f0b
104158 F20101208_AAAYVT pasch_j_Page_018.jpg
8a7f0696eb5fa32e0d9026df1dee67e2
66db89ff6fd5416b00193b8c95f1c0d08cb7ea71
1955 F20101208_AAAZYV pasch_j_Page_016.txt
3c109cbee35507650fe557f3ab657ca4
735ccc225819e9985ea15ce5e647699a88d47b1c
115449 F20101208_AAAZCC pasch_j_Page_184.jpg
d503b22237f91e69e58752900cc6e8f7
e1e03830fff6adbe2193113a41779e6b2c741049
111453 F20101208_AAAZBO pasch_j_Page_170.jpg
1c5f736b3fbad93def8119295a2bf1aa
7e7dd66ba373bbd02df3d041d21a79d28cb0c67d
2148 F20101208_AAAZZL pasch_j_Page_032.txt
5348c370ee003a85cb9ec484729d9782
491b42f91ccd93b5a9dbbd60c44021070c9a192c
106166 F20101208_AAAYWJ pasch_j_Page_034.jpg
9bb0a54870419df9329add5dcf859a44
07cb6acbf9e2d5b7dfb92cb660e04b010802aefd
101464 F20101208_AAAYVU pasch_j_Page_019.jpg
ead3ffc0c8aca44a52514cb4281c73cd
f362b02b25a8b2ffda4478d8a492a5a1721bb065
900 F20101208_AAAZYW pasch_j_Page_017.txt
a249e47d50bba4299873eee170b90cce
b7f78c3c4fb27878352543c6de35aa7c4c714972
118841 F20101208_AAAZCD pasch_j_Page_185.jpg
e03a6e180bc3ac7af5ed8fa42bb7bd5a
941af4903990761c0135ce595ad4f4490505c327
102662 F20101208_AAAZBP pasch_j_Page_171.jpg
74c94df388520cdc225000a19b95d140
778b595274ceadd193d0a0c98589566806f4b166
2236 F20101208_AAAZZM pasch_j_Page_033.txt
6d12a47a17c5acd04db18cd97e01ee38
e951ecafb01ae258d0a9dba124226fada30f32fe
93367 F20101208_AAAYWK pasch_j_Page_035.jpg
b6b53ee05a5b3c8959da52f5c6f39923
f3dba25452d2ddd3db981da1bce2af92959d3dab
75375 F20101208_AAAYVV pasch_j_Page_020.jpg
29d0066e402e6321cc0a1251248d4b96
ebecfe097aed57b195480380beca507dd3b9a30b
2099 F20101208_AAAZYX pasch_j_Page_018.txt
394bd3056e790caf0e87781568ddd3f7
a5509c27d79926aa4b4c1ed5125739379eda0af5
137827 F20101208_AAAZCE pasch_j_Page_186.jpg
ef7b4468420113006b30261b7780cccb
ce77cd90b79ec1fa5ce1b86485ec8a06eebe4762
104651 F20101208_AAAZBQ pasch_j_Page_172.jpg
36be380f6085387369081af8e2bc3077
2b24bca56f7777da02d1619654712c19994f94b6
91655 F20101208_AAAYVW pasch_j_Page_021.jpg
5d34d5d3b3cc833c51c258090d653ad5
2f98a2ca31dbf5a66adffcc7c51b52177347e9a4
2022 F20101208_AAAZYY pasch_j_Page_019.txt
e6db5064d808ce1c564e28b87379c0c6
22ad44e84cd7d87dea1de54777039f3027beff80
129818 F20101208_AAAZCF pasch_j_Page_187.jpg
2ebee800aff4ac31c2954f75b07df0ff
513bf3977b73ab17b38a06f97d1a114dc1f7fd7d
106122 F20101208_AAAZBR pasch_j_Page_173.jpg
50567bdc50fc946cc943d112106aa14e
4f0c5d3945f9f310ffcb7544d799cd58f98d8b01
2103 F20101208_AAAZZN pasch_j_Page_034.txt
e6638e5128aafebc69b431972d958f16
8ea2d93d367a796ce29291dc8a450dd6151886dc
42227 F20101208_AAAYWL pasch_j_Page_036.jpg
0e8cffc38b410d639c14428b187a34f7
1623d4a46bcfd900ae846552e6950d7e3049a1ea
94184 F20101208_AAAYVX pasch_j_Page_022.jpg
29ab3f684a2e7f9985318063cd682a84
cd13ac465d1899c41e8464ee893551852451bd02
1483 F20101208_AAAZYZ pasch_j_Page_020.txt
ef45ca6aaaaad15dae799ed1ed9caef0
0bb03d8d4dd1366a25f2724c7a545c1312699603
118077 F20101208_AAAZCG pasch_j_Page_188.jpg
1832c7ef32f9a4914056dd554e622643
464edb39246b7df7ff02790072a12d3375051d52
110417 F20101208_AAAYXA pasch_j_Page_051.jpg
684710f0eaddaeeb3d22be205db999e6
d442af10f27f3064e4ab9f746c264458ca980355
101340 F20101208_AAAZBS pasch_j_Page_174.jpg
6e006e547d8777d9321124a206ca951c
7d7abd32676a7d698c04ea0681f83e3ee2b126e9
1929 F20101208_AAAZZO pasch_j_Page_035.txt
11693a4ae4a7c779c7f7f12f07479934
50180e4aa319cc98d8e82e82f0cec44e5c6df047
29392 F20101208_AAAYWM pasch_j_Page_037.jpg
4d87316cfd5cf6e158343efebdcf2b51
5fc74306bc1a40693a972259d8a2cc2606a216ba
92912 F20101208_AAAYVY pasch_j_Page_023.jpg
c22ab1e42c2cb92242614464652218e2
7f8aee1c70fa05ce1a76396bf498b4b3c576567a
123784 F20101208_AAAZCH pasch_j_Page_189.jpg
2769e568a2a3d3d43bf23c22d9eaf1cd
3e3821277405d5a5f21601bbb20688e6091f49c8
100034 F20101208_AAAYXB pasch_j_Page_052.jpg
e36a3e47881dfda828ee12d5196b974b
14c32ea285a3af2b7356331b1db32851fe03f151
54858 F20101208_AAAZBT pasch_j_Page_175.jpg
058c1142a353f389477de58109e50f32
5cd8d94a9cf3aeb2dad2e7f159152e281fe53966
777 F20101208_AAAZZP pasch_j_Page_036.txt
905ffc8ab2d9b17ec1cfe9353b78344b
2a1e2aa076b6707d94dc2b9037700760c6a7e28d
102502 F20101208_AAAYWN pasch_j_Page_038.jpg
84fa1622860490d9b38f40e7f664eeef
229933f0b73b4c74e0dc90eb24cb6ac90b336e6f
56928 F20101208_AAAYVZ pasch_j_Page_024.jpg
8c674dd9dabac5776c71210d459031fa
76a66375d574ebd5d7cd736993c028d83575b4c0
45631 F20101208_AAAZCI pasch_j_Page_190.jpg
ebafea30152266b49a706e672625a980
09a23864b9fdc7b95e210153043c8ed5eaf4164d
108443 F20101208_AAAYXC pasch_j_Page_053.jpg
b05c64953c0fb1212b8ec2fa7cd8bb62
b689f87cc1eb7ecda3d72be333b92c97ce02aae9
75958 F20101208_AAAZBU pasch_j_Page_176.jpg
4d240301f0730b3db3666aae68b224d4
1face177ef1f9b76bc68b33a2f8969cadddcfd9d
2153 F20101208_AABAAA pasch_j_Page_047.txt
b73235288d4dacf94fad377fec89a836
7f56fe9292dd85dc6bf57456485efe57445bf608
304 F20101208_AAAZZQ pasch_j_Page_037.txt
6ae5f165008ab334261219fa5f3b1bc5
5d87acc0628172d210a59b378c7d98576c23f8fe
109898 F20101208_AAAYWO pasch_j_Page_039.jpg
09e009d9d2611c2b9b9e3818686afa12
8e035d4d5e796515b265d0dc4dba37db565f0cd9
23633 F20101208_AAAZCJ pasch_j_Page_001.jp2
11277e4fe3740e97efd6e72f4d6c7a19
f13bd8fc07cd75544870a68b243d195b2efb0788
107524 F20101208_AAAYXD pasch_j_Page_054.jpg
ba18384fbc6375446a842ff56c10b4ab
c5255534861aa0fb0b65213ea15670416007ec5c
1969 F20101208_AABAAB pasch_j_Page_048.txt
ea290125e50304e1f8f542136ec61548
55970c33a26fc8518fe07f76dc64c62baa24f353
2119 F20101208_AAAZZR pasch_j_Page_038.txt
b78efdbd00ed9a881356f89e5b11dede
1786f692d656d696abf74f85410d4dbcd2dac8e2
107953 F20101208_AAAYWP pasch_j_Page_040.jpg
3fa65972a66c00ca04aaec29247d5951
72c19359af55bd6e3ed4700b5bed0d7bde265643
5728 F20101208_AAAZCK pasch_j_Page_002.jp2
9487aec8cf4acd0aabad5480b48087bc
6f807d85278fd7d9eadaba84773f79c361052335
115227 F20101208_AAAYXE pasch_j_Page_055.jpg
a8fd55444855fafc50b18602c801dc09
a2d311b761f2517e0fce44c2dc85dafba2f9dd4b
61187 F20101208_AAAZBV pasch_j_Page_177.jpg
25eff2ee75015dff476a5a27d3a30baf
4756d5dd5f329d70addd1e4c93b5b46d3d1c8996
2243 F20101208_AABAAC pasch_j_Page_049.txt
3af5532c6d844663f325c1caa44c6620
9678f87ebfd0b4f7b8d1be69b0a1524b61bdb4ab
2147 F20101208_AAAZZS pasch_j_Page_039.txt
d66bb7a9e8f1721449c51a536dc8e342
af55034d26c8fb7d3088acd7764bd7e8003169f4
114467 F20101208_AAAYWQ pasch_j_Page_041.jpg
0d6a9c2865e169deb03987b77a542f7c
b4bc37ef0cfbec48bc65d56565485e2a4b8c8d6e
18934 F20101208_AAAZCL pasch_j_Page_003.jp2
08f1bb6389845346a2fbb52297458cc4
3b15b5c8dade8c09e03c0cf9f7c8cb02f0e52b13
108266 F20101208_AAAYXF pasch_j_Page_056.jpg
1bcc5d4db0d047494f8f3786aa976e5c
6dffac259043c221dd6ad494f0c3ff449e96d62e
78753 F20101208_AAAZBW pasch_j_Page_178.jpg
7e34ab96baf7bad4b9bb2593b3fb4d72
6a5df867c52a55a45be65261ae12435150edc28b
2154 F20101208_AABAAD pasch_j_Page_050.txt
42d5eeace7a9fd82d5cf9d3502e416ef
94fa7a67864d88f03bbc7fdfc6385ef69c20b548
F20101208_AAAZZT pasch_j_Page_040.txt
097f7af30098ea221ae7f2006f8f32b5
44a10148de471b028897a8a9f2dd3288db73fcad
66532 F20101208_AAAYWR pasch_j_Page_042.jpg
4e8990e1bab56f31c7b9d4a739a513e0
17a6cb0fd88da7838300a144273b518d6f69783d
109393 F20101208_AAAZDA pasch_j_Page_018.jp2
49e9d5cf1ebf92168a545e96df7e0fbb
4320efdf0962dcae9af79238ad7e8eee5da6af3f
44431 F20101208_AAAZCM pasch_j_Page_004.jp2
b574c124f4122a8be6aa791fcbb380f7
c2ec6f6ff32eed8e1bcae0b7ca6d93c7fa402d07
92116 F20101208_AAAYXG pasch_j_Page_057.jpg
b94040563e85fcb68d773df884670947
e3fe64640cacb43c4c21b3c60c1fca8c4ae9605e
73210 F20101208_AAAZBX pasch_j_Page_179.jpg
5452b9a968d81acbaf54d933110987f2
55809ab479e1dd2981b94944bc1835e43cc476ef
2179 F20101208_AABAAE pasch_j_Page_051.txt
10467d494d95e312f4926a58ff6ef313
7d8a8116aa1d4c49e662454cae3ea603813826e5
2237 F20101208_AAAZZU pasch_j_Page_041.txt
28a3053e7b5d3270b09fd76754cf5999
0d04952ad7dfc17012e236190e8c9d2cc93d4b88
49782 F20101208_AAAYWS pasch_j_Page_043.jpg
0024f831ef84362222cea5e0c6baf2ba
8d8b6d3e0df16cbfc43f4999041b9193e65eb799
109596 F20101208_AAAZDB pasch_j_Page_019.jp2
973ae26e96cb9c69895e7cabefbbff34
862d5987c1d86d3ce5fac699eae4a9b928a48c1f
1051977 F20101208_AAAZCN pasch_j_Page_005.jp2
1b92145f9f5e6b751f4cdebf4dc1729a
68202566e1935194ff6920b1e2f5a56d8b6b2f25
110257 F20101208_AAAYXH pasch_j_Page_058.jpg
a4c2180eb15936952cd091eeab849eac
16b5424ad7ef029601c97db2a549ff58c745ef8c
103621 F20101208_AAAZBY pasch_j_Page_180.jpg
2972e064bc8e95d8f1112894dcd45f5e
c6b81bf915e32b8a862fa53bdd9e5a45a95ccfb8
2040 F20101208_AABAAF pasch_j_Page_052.txt
f3aef0f56a8664e69105db7b60e29a0c
4bee3bc8c4aadf38ffc1746101705b9e7e2bdc1b
1347 F20101208_AAAZZV pasch_j_Page_042.txt
66d7d6f080a4ef99326cdf32e184e56e
836b5be648cafeec1ca45d85d22a887b9a520277
103826 F20101208_AAAYWT pasch_j_Page_044.jpg
91d20f068181db40887e948f0110c646
02299943c20a2958173f2924988bbfbb7557d007
78679 F20101208_AAAZDC pasch_j_Page_020.jp2
4f10be1e59ab8cc50f55520744bf1cea
7fd439147cb6f39635a54c169b4c02b6047e0f93
1051985 F20101208_AAAZCO pasch_j_Page_006.jp2
b8d1f1c666027b9c4f7befb5adf5087d
34f7c9a897cccbb57d68eb7d412ed321d2d855ff
107330 F20101208_AAAYXI pasch_j_Page_059.jpg
f5f89b62356bd70efbe3c89b0ea0e029
f98f8083043be40fd4d658e4cdece4950753c818
98082 F20101208_AAAZBZ pasch_j_Page_181.jpg
67231988c29248a49ea1c9c55b6ddfe1
f74df6c2eda6c23db1743899c1011ddcbcc5632b
2118 F20101208_AABAAG pasch_j_Page_053.txt
dc29a657e6cfc0241d5fac438d3a2da6
3e387a7b039123bce42e175d1b283979b0bac7b1
F20101208_AAAZZW pasch_j_Page_043.txt
712bbb2e14f1ae35e36e0d8179eec280
69022ef021612f67047823f339c7f9bdd79c6909
106292 F20101208_AAAYWU pasch_j_Page_045.jpg
fe170a262fda2dcee78c04030a2719c8
07661b0ef84f61991117703a95e8944b4bf4de67
95671 F20101208_AAAZDD pasch_j_Page_021.jp2
26be1d20f9eb1342ae71b4e8276f8d00
cd4e7a1a9b721d5f82a8676a8ca2d03ebdd1ca9f
1051949 F20101208_AAAZCP pasch_j_Page_007.jp2
389bd3be7bc4d457f89b1768f7df6043
ab19b12e4ecb46b750cfe44d906c3cf24d7020d4
103391 F20101208_AAAYXJ pasch_j_Page_060.jpg
61f5c8733b43d1fcb40e033165af7275
380811663e0b1d7fe86585b4c016c910f1129cb7
2141 F20101208_AABAAH pasch_j_Page_054.txt
bd4ce2022db7ce33d99fca382218b8e7
b877e618e68678053a1c6d5c34785ae21a4e0878
2047 F20101208_AAAZZX pasch_j_Page_044.txt
cb8f93759a80bd62e475c589fd16f035
dc447c3e207509125f551d7cd8ac24006626e0f5
93303 F20101208_AAAYWV pasch_j_Page_046.jpg
1711d2c991b13a78d2a0c7fe4d48ec21
a997bbcf696e45ac061549e78473939a7e025f21
99603 F20101208_AAAZDE pasch_j_Page_022.jp2
b88786e7c157683a6cc306a2cb3b6f62
cbd89b91f813903d861f0a83c35017c09fc8db22
1051967 F20101208_AAAZCQ pasch_j_Page_008.jp2
f042933b41dd4233aef16a82b830b8bf
32ce5b64adf34bcd559202efa97fd7214c0996fd
112923 F20101208_AAAYXK pasch_j_Page_061.jpg
aaeb8d3a5e630a511da4ba9a8438245d
02600ec0c479a43b4cc056f98e700f28e0e44c0c
2270 F20101208_AABAAI pasch_j_Page_055.txt
ddd24595f33233f2cc2006b477e670fa
04a72b1cead261b2285048f0af6f4e4a94730cc1
2067 F20101208_AAAZZY pasch_j_Page_045.txt
62da5694a1ef174798271c55d37ac939
283ef5eae496ea08bce6b8c40aebf85b1dc61967
98374 F20101208_AAAZDF pasch_j_Page_023.jp2
4796e16f37b61450f282437aa55af94b
f8794c044ff50c3452915319823b3f65a4353941
1051952 F20101208_AAAZCR pasch_j_Page_009.jp2
ecabb774182b77d09bfa7b4c3e018dee
ab29341d6fc93db6e3ed107be752d816e67fe69a
106917 F20101208_AAAYXL pasch_j_Page_062.jpg
6d09282a55211995e9dbbe462018961a
d30db18a08e15a5421b694da597203371e34d335
109937 F20101208_AAAYWW pasch_j_Page_047.jpg
ab231ba9018d49be55f3d62afd79335c
4da6e38ad55214d9b8691653c841b4dbf43b9824
2150 F20101208_AABAAJ pasch_j_Page_056.txt
515ad5b02157a2f58a1196170e13b87f
aeb5f27743b0ddeb078d3c1b7eeebbc8c0a6db74
1901 F20101208_AAAZZZ pasch_j_Page_046.txt
2b5797e1bda39b886fd1307ac7081884
a2f29b10f6df0d287af9de9db24ddca45ccd742f
61284 F20101208_AAAZDG pasch_j_Page_024.jp2
6dc5b142bb5c543f78a9c6fc05056606
8f08910cb3691ba7c04f46ff3f4c82248f70a4d5
120717 F20101208_AAAYYA pasch_j_Page_077.jpg
1fa3832c0e17a4c612ef951c870e99cc
690f6f8a0ffa891f78069d906c07aa7023f37db5
F20101208_AAAZCS pasch_j_Page_010.jp2
0fa3d3a669bf64350a466c7674d5c29e
904dfe6d7de7e499e4798e2af58d7d17049cbc05
101387 F20101208_AAAYWX pasch_j_Page_048.jpg
577cc5e456a821866e95dcd27a9bb452
fa51a65e53da8c65ac6cc0cec0dbf842cd1aa0c2
1886 F20101208_AABAAK pasch_j_Page_057.txt
65d45361c3351ee5cf9f131dde2a8e23
7bd28399a6afd3e672a591f58b1d028c176a20e9
58832 F20101208_AAAZDH pasch_j_Page_025.jp2
99d73916eea2c0746a3ab49cb163947e
cb9fb792c5ec25d6f2a24adeaec043c74f861ec1
97405 F20101208_AAAYYB pasch_j_Page_078.jpg
717c6aefebb41bffd4b620de83fde1f7
b96f2f436ae9760ab99628ff7169c604f31f63c1
578313 F20101208_AAAZCT pasch_j_Page_011.jp2
4be8c27c42555f451cac291cb574bb3f
09ad3692795a9cb432f2a4544bb97fc4912ff8ee
93161 F20101208_AAAYXM pasch_j_Page_063.jpg
3e6922a4f227b755393549f68cbd7152
c2de275e7f567fdda05827a1e53806a0706bce61
111717 F20101208_AAAYWY pasch_j_Page_049.jpg
33af7d2390b1367cc392a13848644b14
29d2a9a60196947b37db9fd6ef003488ddf21b2a
2181 F20101208_AABAAL pasch_j_Page_058.txt
021d2db886e600989179776e7fcdaa39
9ab94a36ea2e96748f619cd17dfc0994f31b16c8
74543 F20101208_AAAZDI pasch_j_Page_026.jp2
09ece67f082465eafe67fb49caeda781
c014e4a423e7488a38d69be4a65c78d973a25f98
117097 F20101208_AAAYYC pasch_j_Page_079.jpg
5b48e9727407b8f652dc8ca7e0d529f9
f7f33c7ea599aee230913dc98ee9ea818479cf1c
38679 F20101208_AAAZCU pasch_j_Page_012.jp2
35154758909afce739de71e6499cc169
663fa6db558c43e9cb274e1fdad11fc6a9382e36
84310 F20101208_AAAYXN pasch_j_Page_064.jpg
2d9bcb9afafc8dff4e1da163beae8c45
fa55749e97f253bcddd273452a7dc1c3d320f0c2
109168 F20101208_AAAYWZ pasch_j_Page_050.jpg
fcd8dd1d4a299ee8344c01a176d8bdf2
7d132baf46614e84dec1541b47c7ebb80d716b9f
1681 F20101208_AABABA pasch_j_Page_073.txt
39cb9eebef24f13a245ed282b731e0ed
d229c77899f67df8c220dc7157a73ef7071bd197
2108 F20101208_AABAAM pasch_j_Page_059.txt
d537e41b40b9f1bfb55b4e0a4a562688
498d1d07528b00ed34256cffec687001d5949c16
87822 F20101208_AAAZDJ pasch_j_Page_027.jp2
d7330b6d247ba71c1b62bfbf1b8c73cb
e71c7af28102c5ec63357d6c6117764db2a01573
56703 F20101208_AAAYYD pasch_j_Page_080.jpg
ebf6d809d67c656750672c80e1093d98
4d21f7a9c8ec231f3698585b87ac6505793a67be
35583 F20101208_AAAZCV pasch_j_Page_013.jp2
cd9c9226f9aa03b85d8695f9543a44e3
777f0f91b73771f8c2ef8b6cf658aff436a95ca2
63156 F20101208_AAAYXO pasch_j_Page_065.jpg
fe2f94a79fe76a3fee3af1e0fcd01c62
1432d5aa5929033636e0b78c7babe1223ed3d1c1
1464 F20101208_AABABB pasch_j_Page_074.txt
a84eb932792d8e08c2b7af83f683d756
ffa0a8d33d4545762513cebe453dfe6e23914a0f
2045 F20101208_AABAAN pasch_j_Page_060.txt
f1a23e783ca5dc9bef14b65013e042cc
96c5d6a352d9223dad979dceaf52b0669fc04c80
94403 F20101208_AAAZDK pasch_j_Page_028.jp2
d941619585ec3f3714262d4031a4b134
71aa860e6527cc697500518b60e0541bdb203bc7
74301 F20101208_AAAYYE pasch_j_Page_081.jpg
a2b57d5f285657fdf21cad16e2802e2b
13b845c4a781db7d0bf0d774fb3efaee62dabf4c
76779 F20101208_AAAYXP pasch_j_Page_066.jpg
9dd2a58ff5a1080ab102131f0696d8b7
0bd2b794cb1df6d921f14b75ccfcc79eecb6db93
2159 F20101208_AABABC pasch_j_Page_075.txt
dfb8bcabf593038cd3113cc81eda995e
c42748b6c508bc389d5399fb529fef346553112c
69644 F20101208_AAAZDL pasch_j_Page_029.jp2
a86e914be908d30ac9476e89e5eafbd8
a9aee6f9addc2f5964f8e6c0bfa88abe220fff4e
32581 F20101208_AAAYYF pasch_j_Page_082.jpg
fa0543644d355807504e6c2ec118bcff
c9fde45adc0207aeee079745444d4a2f34b9721e
26725 F20101208_AAAZCW pasch_j_Page_014.jp2
bf92e8e058eb55bad538fc5ccd660f0a
698a8ca507dd01e554652895069ca6ecdeb71c3e
108361 F20101208_AAAYXQ pasch_j_Page_067.jpg
6ceaaa243d37f61873d6aa294e26874c
f450b7a10fd7682b6e99e341135a97b439d87d55
1829 F20101208_AABABD pasch_j_Page_076.txt
847bb993ec45d8a57e06dea621fbed8e
14272ab6e1c5395d558d9241584cf9cea1696301
2201 F20101208_AABAAO pasch_j_Page_061.txt
f4d6713c6c89f0f9d3c4e5acda61b1ad
10591e5707f2ccecfe32dc9a378c3d99b06ac781
84433 F20101208_AAAZDM pasch_j_Page_030.jp2
b49e3c50ab55e55123739f02dc774d67
ce367fc621eeda98fb9f3bfac9840bc8ff8bb3b4
50272 F20101208_AAAYYG pasch_j_Page_083.jpg
09996301af96ea36f1ae8ea4acb218eb
5afdc1bf7870a75cfe670cdb8f0d2a2bacfac404
31271 F20101208_AAAZCX pasch_j_Page_015.jp2
f6e5386f18909e9f40317546b1bcda1f
82303d3e2c22c27e88ea5385e360538adbae7f4b
109094 F20101208_AAAYXR pasch_j_Page_068.jpg
61dada52bd402f1dcec67a67918a497c
fbc85d650d669847e5c40b1841ad407dfe1b14ac
110001 F20101208_AAAZEA pasch_j_Page_044.jp2
7b65b949cae89c85f506fe05f5fdac77
200224b25f07ad5e5037b135a28c0b8c719184c0
3073 F20101208_AABABE pasch_j_Page_077.txt
1598f820a99ee6fc2e319ba2fe1711b8
b057003c26b156b7deb8c89a7c2460335f99353e
2100 F20101208_AABAAP pasch_j_Page_062.txt
a4bd62c7d400467338ec0331e04c2b5f
561fd3249d359b4fc7906d661d0d5349750071b7
95469 F20101208_AAAZDN pasch_j_Page_031.jp2
263ace7c3eecff958eef84368e6c67e1
4fb04ebe19b82da1ec84d6784b4067567435b131
61575 F20101208_AAAYYH pasch_j_Page_084.jpg
a1ecd06b1a26881978747384d351c9e3
ba42450520841d9f32bb343ba649f7741759d4c5
98177 F20101208_AAAZCY pasch_j_Page_016.jp2
15293809b609cd6a62218c6530344d7d
519fdbf71865b50810c8dcb54b2d06e86f50f060
103358 F20101208_AAAYXS pasch_j_Page_069.jpg
152c3656c6c93d4d079c38151766196c
2904971bea5395c7c51e0aed1ad8ab9d3f2550a9
111326 F20101208_AAAZEB pasch_j_Page_045.jp2
d237b28cdfd232eb4ebd554dc50efe47
ae479e0742825d6f052c4b37acbb5d774576cba5
887 F20101208_AABABF pasch_j_Page_078.txt
9e37d276b426d14bb768c2a64fc3ef39
0cec41b73413ce71007d3e1019e9540f1b8f71ec
F20101208_AABAAQ pasch_j_Page_063.txt
3242e20aa97bdeeeb0168866d75802ed
3d6252963d53f3637748ba81367b14a6f145dd53
115898 F20101208_AAAZDO pasch_j_Page_032.jp2
35ec6b39743712b959662d3c274548d9
62105a8264c81cc5d358bef3818e257ec438908c
61401 F20101208_AAAYYI pasch_j_Page_085.jpg
03bf0c97866f0dc4c29a1c759c26ed26
52b6e639a5b66b018095beaedb9b61fee5468f3c
50700 F20101208_AAAZCZ pasch_j_Page_017.jp2
babfc4594e0191d0cd15c6909760f074
7b4c822d73e7ee0c50ef5f06e62dae59b79d4845
65246 F20101208_AAAYXT pasch_j_Page_070.jpg
49dcf117a8fe7ef941486da5686576cd
47afd5faf2fd05bc3160488070c06f464a54b3d3
102752 F20101208_AAAZEC pasch_j_Page_046.jp2
64c2dd998775d03f52a7b5661f41a5e9
90b7431cf0b0fa095fefc6d056e332ef92b02c96
2102 F20101208_AABABG pasch_j_Page_079.txt
a7277a4ebbbe3466d416c6cd42569477
fa19c96587835c3af5250c169deb53b69c4da5ce
1742 F20101208_AABAAR pasch_j_Page_064.txt
6da03c816c0fe54f0feefbfccb86bb2e
12c288ca864726805a42805615998c26dee5b3d7
121244 F20101208_AAAZDP pasch_j_Page_033.jp2
972b575e0289db84f9b6b6378f43382f
54d07b8f0279c3f1f183335e14342ac42ba73115
72427 F20101208_AAAYYJ pasch_j_Page_086.jpg
3d8d2ed4f88c9f90741a34b2a191a5c1
57fa9cc4d2cac5287bfdee84193012fb6d9de3a0
97320 F20101208_AAAYXU pasch_j_Page_071.jpg
715e063e4848b387f9441c568e8d72bd
fe336abc5e3c2843381632bbdc91560168948205
117397 F20101208_AAAZED pasch_j_Page_047.jp2
6f76cabe3e891f219acd848227af1543
e78f88c78cd860f4b5f446498a034fcc9203cd50
481 F20101208_AABABH pasch_j_Page_080.txt
e36e7fd166a145597f79ed162d3f26ec
b689d30485d575f0c2385cdc4b4a6e3f8be79b38
1393 F20101208_AABAAS pasch_j_Page_065.txt
fb8df21f8f963f56987b284ce50b5b81
b59d98d4f5ec3f90bf3421c91b601d2a2150fb5c
114281 F20101208_AAAZDQ pasch_j_Page_034.jp2
28cd24f9f79105678e54687ae376accb
274e4ab38b8550295691e1c8445c43c51cd0ef36
75768 F20101208_AAAYYK pasch_j_Page_087.jpg
0d3ee6df09388e5235669e1a4b6e071f
f4189a1006a4335183872b6bd42fdef1e1a43ba7
99544 F20101208_AAAYXV pasch_j_Page_072.jpg
7e3f4cc9cffbd2a70705f071891f1e76
94c4f3d119e8964cd98e83a9c2d27a32a04cccab
109278 F20101208_AAAZEE pasch_j_Page_048.jp2
e6ccd7c368f53581fd5228b17190057c
274ab432b427bfa978a4defcf46c9942a743a709
368 F20101208_AABABI pasch_j_Page_081.txt
031aff4e346a8c1094928e7e9b2fbc31
d1a03e2f66305d961ca5f735901be4b39f1485b5
1723 F20101208_AABAAT pasch_j_Page_066.txt
b8fe8574a77058c11059885c5e75b98f
d5a996add4e496a3b8e732a4ee282c2d2cfdc6ed
99931 F20101208_AAAZDR pasch_j_Page_035.jp2
d1c093757999b9ab5e43a89652e4c84c
3a7bf27ca1a71b42cdd33c831b1b210483c67208
36443 F20101208_AAAYYL pasch_j_Page_088.jpg
94b95fd10a107f439e2b7fb914cbc57e
b09a175ee750d22735cc158312db7271222c705a
77111 F20101208_AAAYXW pasch_j_Page_073.jpg
db30374d05b061a0000a4faf09914403
f64d097e58feebdef04029d2a982531c8aaa2909
119380 F20101208_AAAZEF pasch_j_Page_049.jp2
28d9e2f0c111f4f162c38d4503b8e9a9
04cdf72141764b1f02ac86c3b7f3c20f7cbbff36
130 F20101208_AABABJ pasch_j_Page_082.txt
9ddfcb69f07af982aa483bea5993a154
d93a2b6074806c5f16d2514dd9c730444b135d7b
2144 F20101208_AABAAU pasch_j_Page_067.txt
ddfb69993d48f263cd79ff257a4bf2b7
93a05553019575c9724b0a541b19fe7debbab35f
45193 F20101208_AAAZDS pasch_j_Page_036.jp2
546e1cf9964e3f6f7a65e6c4e5f09d4f
ac1ef5c08bdb8f4370fb83818ae80efe4c1981e7
48022 F20101208_AAAYYM pasch_j_Page_089.jpg
786aa43cf3d9ba43ac41e9a66f2357ee
0975ecf718dc0c174647e3496d75dd46c68e2274
70562 F20101208_AAAYXX pasch_j_Page_074.jpg
3c8f34c1bf809a3a86d53748fe5bc6a7
b2594f29d9f7e47099c4203d004147d9f9625e9c
115943 F20101208_AAAZEG pasch_j_Page_050.jp2
9c80f0b3a3589ca8b9597e89cef66d27
0c51f98ad7100adf0e840d988e303c63adfee704
76487 F20101208_AAAYZA pasch_j_Page_103.jpg
777ac2e909468d4a9fbd1812b03483a5
6fb5adc122fa70f6a49c719b5ae0c2a1d99f8eee
345 F20101208_AABABK pasch_j_Page_083.txt
7550eaedb9d0a3d45436285c555bf12a
42cc8d41761bc335ff9d368ecefa99c6287ca52e
2190 F20101208_AABAAV pasch_j_Page_068.txt
320ca3c1af28c720435a2b2af6fec98e
528365c96eab24d19aed72d486b0cbec20586cbc
279590 F20101208_AAAZDT pasch_j_Page_037.jp2
e2cb006f97c5881df1b3c8aaf34e0e30
d2f156f227ff80fd19ae13bf6a562e471a3fea22
109917 F20101208_AAAYXY pasch_j_Page_075.jpg
f1e08754b9cdab91f2fc410a98f6a9d1
967900832cec66d69f812a2493af3d421601cbf2
117917 F20101208_AAAZEH pasch_j_Page_051.jp2
961f0d0d4cdbe79e8d3488fd9b963ceb
728cc6723d1e63d2c1b16258f3aa0f6ea53b8d99
87680 F20101208_AAAYZB pasch_j_Page_104.jpg
6ee1c20e36086032f0bb1c3000a98a63
df311ac27085a9dd80e6d516df23e765081e5924
934 F20101208_AABABL pasch_j_Page_084.txt
2e48c27862093ccde605e2e9d62c6947
12d3b2adfb5e4aa723b33d2af7c6c6a9e78cb9f2
2039 F20101208_AABAAW pasch_j_Page_069.txt
3a43bbe0b5a10b942d60db5446d65e81
c5cbb1eddaf13778e38b2cbf8d9c0809256027a7
88720 F20101208_AAAYYN pasch_j_Page_090.jpg
12cf6c8535385f15f31aa3e06e5c9c25
edc27563025da4465994feb7a890c55aa497b1ad
91746 F20101208_AAAYXZ pasch_j_Page_076.jpg
fa7ebb7ad8e0a20900b67f17155a7f03
7b6d91240d1cb1b3799ff0f518b9d84d59d5701f
105476 F20101208_AAAZEI pasch_j_Page_052.jp2
904aa2d73416b21e817e6e471519d181
9eb22109493dfc3e978faea0388f5f8897cc1b37
41184 F20101208_AAAYZC pasch_j_Page_105.jpg
6656f3183ea70d7ecdad57cef05ccc90
13d691ff64511691f8475b4ccc7e20153ce51dbe
108750 F20101208_AAAZDU pasch_j_Page_038.jp2
76a4bf46e9b122d87630a96ebdb4d280
945e14c0fcb4ae1d624caf8effe20b627a4f1680
308 F20101208_AABACA pasch_j_Page_099.txt
bbb51b04fdfc2d60cec30abd1dfba099
e6a092ace17643d7900130bc0df99b64587c38fc
909 F20101208_AABABM pasch_j_Page_085.txt
74499ce05e00bea8b0b0fa9acb3e35a2
149cc1e6605d200ab37d029d3322275e25aa6946
1435 F20101208_AABAAX pasch_j_Page_070.txt
ef7365c30649869a1c7a4f3b46661bd0
f39d04df2a780e9e7eecc64154f8cafce4fb6dbd
107646 F20101208_AAAYYO pasch_j_Page_091.jpg
bcc57d67c19bbdbadc6066fe162bc5c8
7690ca1330828f4542b18e85455204c2703e9d4e
112679 F20101208_AAAZEJ pasch_j_Page_053.jp2
0a04a5745a0c101490f9285975bfb8b5
0e3e889688ad518ebe7674050c36b7d4f58a6c98
93911 F20101208_AAAYZD pasch_j_Page_106.jpg
d06ed95ff9c1e0e9268467a1585bf7ae
378b9f6b5465a607afa8fe3a23bdca9938b63b45
116480 F20101208_AAAZDV pasch_j_Page_039.jp2
f8dc2f6e58a464f111b9c1665f3876e3
bae054bd63bf2d35e19fafa2b77dfa1f53cd8b6e
975 F20101208_AABACB pasch_j_Page_100.txt
d78c2d0ded8555314b80bbd155857aed
c8f14377738ea0c9a7ed89a5fdb7f49adf15d78e
441 F20101208_AABABN pasch_j_Page_086.txt
c4ca90799af887e86a409b6108341c35
3df4507b011a2915e5247288d987bd7ae8ae13a2
1882 F20101208_AABAAY pasch_j_Page_071.txt
b929917913241d2b1d188d075a4aa1e8
01c22bb4a9c27a5ccba28f2e0618e02404c4f401
107584 F20101208_AAAYYP pasch_j_Page_092.jpg
092bcaae08127fd95225771d246b2455
385275f27747a25e50269deaadedf331e870ab94
114594 F20101208_AAAZEK pasch_j_Page_054.jp2
64f6c6d5ab0cf243d3be015d2fc329e7
35475e64b0664c6a64faf354b411684eec862f9d
93374 F20101208_AAAYZE pasch_j_Page_108.jpg
f6b9b02b0374cf8f39fa6110f55483da
a2fe5fbfaa31e077049d79df9b299d19c302e751
113038 F20101208_AAAZDW pasch_j_Page_040.jp2
9905d497516105b2980a6aa6c4128a62
2ea5a91b5067a6856489b6f69d6f0744b9cc793a
435 F20101208_AABACC pasch_j_Page_101.txt
96e6c0d3f1cdd94f1bb9c7147ac459ed
1a7add2ff307dae702800a4ec54aaea84f462afa
1465 F20101208_AABABO pasch_j_Page_087.txt
139157e387750dedb6a8875e6d233511
2d82b6757413637765b75bdd5aee0885e72fd36e
2013 F20101208_AABAAZ pasch_j_Page_072.txt
be5284756d4125a8bf9aec7b3c195859
89e3f9a709ae887e211d378333283d84c6a4a9b7
104355 F20101208_AAAYYQ pasch_j_Page_093.jpg
2a9facb08c25a153bb41212ba0c2c045
4795be783ca665648835ac71836cae3622d07d4a
121554 F20101208_AAAZEL pasch_j_Page_055.jp2
63b4e16ad8acca8503f6b5781b4b4a41
f657c61eb6d7693052d2b0c2b392f468f64ff356
101629 F20101208_AAAYZF pasch_j_Page_109.jpg
67a1daeeb6c6f83218c7f74fed6859f7
9a53a3ea298e5f21d18d05bd11716e11ad4c0893
552 F20101208_AABACD pasch_j_Page_102.txt
a1133b7581fa0a806fd96c7c351ac590
085ee42db463b197fa28b0c134eb16b1024f2beb
108456 F20101208_AAAYYR pasch_j_Page_094.jpg
23d213fd1da775bb818fbd0bf7d321d6
17b5ff2a1804521283e1a1fe6eb76976926a7a08
101623 F20101208_AAAZFA pasch_j_Page_071.jp2
79bacc6452091d1c2adfadfba87c9160
e849b39fecdb7ac50b40f2f2a44299775401fe4a
114847 F20101208_AAAZEM pasch_j_Page_056.jp2
be9a16fecd2779ac5ed72ed5e714040e
a1d6f83202457f9aecd863b3b61a4b6aaa69c2af
104968 F20101208_AAAYZG pasch_j_Page_110.jpg
0d7734ccf32886cc163c70e6577224ca
d5da618aaa078f8bc5bcf7ae1b06a9dd756a533a
118320 F20101208_AAAZDX pasch_j_Page_041.jp2
83b524c567fe620b564c27c30f26702d
83e9896fc2f6272df46199e5a68f1ef7263142ed
755 F20101208_AABACE pasch_j_Page_103.txt
b0717972b77d5ca389e1d2aca90e8b8c
a17e22f3efad9e2e9d283aa906e69207be43f673
651 F20101208_AABABP pasch_j_Page_088.txt
da8706c854bd7f872a9090337b937822
b4ff00cd6278a6b02b3f192748b1eec37fdfe376
109540 F20101208_AAAYYS pasch_j_Page_095.jpg
ce23219debdc64f04e34a7f07a4daa88
99fcbd5b479940c49b3f0aa5d321667537aba6a3
105162 F20101208_AAAZFB pasch_j_Page_072.jp2
9481b6dd45857093b8a41a34b111bd8d
8ef4cca324ab6db57842fa1ba80db6560c56fd78
98552 F20101208_AAAZEN pasch_j_Page_057.jp2
c12e995c95196d464d00e968843185f7
c51e65e366b68cc44df274a935f302f5582eb4b0
103363 F20101208_AAAYZH pasch_j_Page_111.jpg
89be97dfbc5939f6b86b525dc3ae47df
14843d44c207be9f59c42f31ca8d403b83056ceb
69630 F20101208_AAAZDY pasch_j_Page_042.jp2
421ea9bf60bf6266afb99c0627355f85
ed2253c63614466e1acc4d85632ad5ae5177aebb
566 F20101208_AABACF pasch_j_Page_104.txt
52d737454e19cf47573832e8188fc799
2405387e70cb42e20ef978f803438389a47e56aa
152 F20101208_AABABQ pasch_j_Page_089.txt
6cba10f1899086720fb3000262fc649d
3d2337d22572d28a61bc725ab49697ca390b1f3e
104262 F20101208_AAAYYT pasch_j_Page_096.jpg
ef675c4e76287d144d1892deefd236e8
a00346b85e64d5e552dfc51aa9c8424e12ff5938
82104 F20101208_AAAZFC pasch_j_Page_073.jp2
9a57aaac0be31459a4998559782cd7e2
af310c3f1f00fdd7eee19bb5dbb00eea374b967b
116098 F20101208_AAAZEO pasch_j_Page_058.jp2
3a73805396db9cc893ca1e0cbb9f00bc
801965dede747d9c87d101e9d8d02bda577750d0
90021 F20101208_AAAYZI pasch_j_Page_112.jpg
7ecd55aa03f09e4798c3a7dfee0d0fe4
76f7fbcd27f6d464f70f7966089636fb0fe30529
500750 F20101208_AAAZDZ pasch_j_Page_043.jp2
5708ebdba2e747645af1c99707e81f04
d596794e48f77bf2f8dbf249180282b37b0caf3a
516 F20101208_AABACG pasch_j_Page_105.txt
6cf7b3cbb3c123dcb342d0aee5cb4f02
2dc98a20684dc78b184c3fcd2d42686e87c25a5c
1867 F20101208_AABABR pasch_j_Page_090.txt
98a88761eeeea84e61081d4c94cf920c
04fc34c8e6ba6113583a91f53c630a24441e73f3
91704 F20101208_AAAYYU pasch_j_Page_097.jpg
d2a9f20085c5dcb08772be26424bfdf8
91777d5e8e18fcb0fb64c4dd2d82df4797aa13e9
71746 F20101208_AAAZFD pasch_j_Page_074.jp2
9ed3b87669af289c686dd715ae46b612
69667eddf9d0efb9817d5b57faea956b0c4ed152
112778 F20101208_AAAZEP pasch_j_Page_059.jp2
935a43cf58693022960304fce1b1212e
346c4d181d7d331408813b60adbd779150df632d
114460 F20101208_AAAYZJ pasch_j_Page_113.jpg
077cce87199c241a075c4bbdd703030f
926bc17b276455d142d55bbd8c81fd91e113fd54
1893 F20101208_AABACH pasch_j_Page_106.txt
f06524253399ddd0b4de9dcfc721133e
02dbc863b01f431e3e2f7540e5eab39253d51f04
2142 F20101208_AABABS pasch_j_Page_091.txt
394f8f43fee810023c3e04e5f4208a87
f7774ecec985d01a8ecbd213c12900794389127b
63290 F20101208_AAAYYV pasch_j_Page_098.jpg
5de62a28e564e994cd01636c24a45630
cf0c675731af1d9ffaf9c0fa310f01c6acdcaa85
115949 F20101208_AAAZFE pasch_j_Page_075.jp2
2f4bbc6f52f4ea95861f1e86871c214d
933606143b83755386da2cf7878c3cd84881d5e6
110363 F20101208_AAAZEQ pasch_j_Page_060.jp2
75e8be2b0ef4b6cffb06040789f080cd
1e741bbc5661627c36d49be6ec1894d721903d9d
103153 F20101208_AAAYZK pasch_j_Page_114.jpg
3e434dd397b0376a56f23fbb68019664
a0ab2fac8a8d2ff00ee248f9f4a2a31a109f2945
2051 F20101208_AABACI pasch_j_Page_107.txt
52ff74e628631ae5bb3e43131d122298
a5336a17ad9d0c53b42a3dbe05a84dd2acbefd55
2156 F20101208_AABABT pasch_j_Page_092.txt
d21f8b85d33626881b59af185d7dba66
c01980f9077e14b9accab82afa1d84e236067e3c
17878 F20101208_AAAYYW pasch_j_Page_099.jpg
52c2d443f2209f93818db5483151d1f4
ed32ebde26b3eb3323409f70fe0213ac3343571e
97718 F20101208_AAAZFF pasch_j_Page_076.jp2
761335824ea172c45a13e4f98f0c9a4e
bcc3f6b8116c476381bd7e4cc14198a9e1ffd5f9
119467 F20101208_AAAZER pasch_j_Page_061.jp2
a24228894ed2c676379ecc757bc5cce6
c14f727d278332a8cca082c6241c9961354bd53e
94241 F20101208_AAAYZL pasch_j_Page_115.jpg
83c6be80ed8a37682db78a5581965fd6
ea2d58881e67c9a2e57d2a4d967ebeaae1026ac7
F20101208_AABACJ pasch_j_Page_108.txt
b94ec267c1e1449e8649701e94d42a17
b31f4d62905a596dce7c5cdd1fc34fdd0a1454c3
F20101208_AABABU pasch_j_Page_093.txt
d850097ac6713fb7454c5cb6e5537bfb
a7e3a4f22b0798c4aad3d7270b441e89c400c920
63695 F20101208_AAAYYX pasch_j_Page_100.jpg
bdf44a42dc15f4f32639df621f53fa1f
a49f3b741030ca9cb8eaf1d06fac6fccc4b32dbe
122488 F20101208_AAAZFG pasch_j_Page_077.jp2
fda46347994edd844ce303ee8c9e692d
68da7fe1cc52e328849cde95ca45a65b47380d3a
112975 F20101208_AAAZES pasch_j_Page_062.jp2
70d85ee4257197040a972a30f63f92dc
91d33809fe0a1b94a2044271337eaf16e9d53709
105442 F20101208_AAAYZM pasch_j_Page_116.jpg
e851d422957a5264bb5befde21f6bcc8
95035e48b423c44123a96afbd63558d3f1d12c92
2068 F20101208_AABACK pasch_j_Page_109.txt
1eea43b6879e9b0cb59ed6f20f8f38a4
e32b28e0de2c39f9f764962b201df2b58dc0e9a9
2160 F20101208_AABABV pasch_j_Page_094.txt
10750ae386f31c4424ace0af5d535141
fb7437d0a1bce2efaa4d74d2a05c3224924e5ec9
84804 F20101208_AAAYYY pasch_j_Page_101.jpg
98564c1ff56c8c024a9ac77eeb6622e5
3b16f88a0a0480fa122a37cf6f210775e70aac9a
110349 F20101208_AAAZFH pasch_j_Page_078.jp2
17ba28296e1ae8ef1cd9bd55a91c08e3
72c72b2326e192ade58350cbcd908b0e71cd4a3a
99163 F20101208_AAAZET pasch_j_Page_063.jp2
21cd663bd9fc7304d2a36853052f49ec
68d5892dad51bdb68b52efdd291da98c37dd445b
109250 F20101208_AAAYZN pasch_j_Page_117.jpg
9fd74c1a241f1bf847f2f0724035d034
684c7dec41bfd76d2b633951125df5b6e903bb44
2114 F20101208_AABACL pasch_j_Page_110.txt
cd618233ac465d7ffdcb590f42915bc6
dbd6337fa75be130a9047adaf6dc7879f68a766a
F20101208_AABABW pasch_j_Page_095.txt
edb25367e858691bfc3df990fd4800b1
ea84dab331f30b0e6ab350ae9785fb8846a9dd76
53725 F20101208_AAAYYZ pasch_j_Page_102.jpg
6b69d72ead451fb4a2557795743d7b7e
6df10b61bb17803223753a2217a4c55b4c725093
99893 F20101208_AAAZFI pasch_j_Page_079.jp2
5cc0a677e6f16d887ba52270918cbad3
192c68d3da325a0e73e4af0e849f6399cd20e695
90476 F20101208_AAAZEU pasch_j_Page_064.jp2
f8986fc4b6aac1164fc7fe61e020da8c
7dddf36aeefa95ae2a1cc6dc741f3385cf8585ea
386 F20101208_AABADA pasch_j_Page_125.txt
8492b5364e2bd405f9ca230150bb7911
f8ab0f4e3bead55ad093c7a83bcbfd94f01422b6
2166 F20101208_AABACM pasch_j_Page_111.txt
ab7ce6179cdf8d082b5716978f21933f
49a7fef6b61d92abf7bd27a7489887f69ac18e4d
2072 F20101208_AABABX pasch_j_Page_096.txt
38e63f5fbdb627026d3c52811cf4bc47
750eda9fa3e248b7cd74dbd0947d4a3078058d41
677250 F20101208_AAAZFJ pasch_j_Page_080.jp2
3a3b392d952d274a85a79296a363db58
b4fcd261adae5b3f76603732c1658cf8ba109c01
83685 F20101208_AAAZEV pasch_j_Page_066.jp2
7d4ac4986d8fc60dbc34af585685f3fc
3decf98a93a216a7eb3d39028823348ade1d5e98
106405 F20101208_AAAYZO pasch_j_Page_118.jpg
928852b88a70179348cf6c576a088fa9
5fe1e075dee7907eb15520f9601361e3f8a99b4d
373 F20101208_AABADB pasch_j_Page_126.txt
d9fb78160a8d6248a179d4910db1ddfb
4b4120e9ab418123a252f4194fc99a1bf3141641
1761 F20101208_AABACN pasch_j_Page_112.txt
3a0aa176434ab5c5efc62075d1dcada9
52080b5f71d85dfcfa8a4f496dae59d9edbb4566
1856 F20101208_AABABY pasch_j_Page_097.txt
64e9ac8c3bab3e530bc13a9d1483512c
41ba8d2b2642935cc372d7b49d78c34845d00256
1051945 F20101208_AAAZFK pasch_j_Page_081.jp2
db066652e251eb0c63dbb420ce204890
4d8e6a6727a565af5960e7d735fa66babb21819c
114003 F20101208_AAAZEW pasch_j_Page_067.jp2
c04c6cce451cd3b3f1edffe85c9f5628
98c7415a3a387abbf90c7905bc98404d0ceef9ce
109605 F20101208_AAAYZP pasch_j_Page_119.jpg
e2c563f4518fd700b060dadccea27bc2
4eb597ddbc6bfd542b99380b20f815b1850eac42
382 F20101208_AABADC pasch_j_Page_127.txt
3439e76a0a7bfef4e061e2a5d01efa10
4c0733090c80fcafdfdbe2d047e010a1d2585546
2324 F20101208_AABACO pasch_j_Page_113.txt
b0678a897c77c5ea96c3dc7d90c6fbd0
f05e68854e58d6b69cf63ca96284305b07549df7
1230 F20101208_AABABZ pasch_j_Page_098.txt
d00bb94a8004aacc18375d38c1f544e5
f8996035c77d87061b47a416d54809e4b1bcef3c
388920 F20101208_AAAZFL pasch_j_Page_082.jp2
3741a8bbd046351ca3064f1f8120efc7
0726bb93bbfa429255e5f2c47048497a5b666526
113767 F20101208_AAAZEX pasch_j_Page_068.jp2
7b50efe16c374829046fbe9ba68604e6
51e2cc7f89a1350b3861dd5e9148571d5d310252
56669 F20101208_AAAYZQ pasch_j_Page_120.jpg
d084ce810efa739236923ad9594f4dea
468ac9b1703951a347cb79035f384ee549d435e5
F20101208_AABADD pasch_j_Page_128.txt
91fd5c8274f0dee1fb27fb5780e6c6be
0f95f07b668f9e5f34b0b078b280bc490cc9abe8
F20101208_AABACP pasch_j_Page_114.txt
2fd236799d4d6661b2816489f2bc6d47
cae905012affddb14f93efc623b2a34bb0bb22dd
752431 F20101208_AAAZFM pasch_j_Page_083.jp2
2b08e94d006262ccb75ab30c031b7539
a0c2c16eddb58df99e4360df21fc830ff507a2f3
77332 F20101208_AAAYZR pasch_j_Page_121.jpg
f65b1e7296def59e45d44c304e69c6c9
776dd4d4149708effd7d424afa0b0a66d17b0ff0
98061 F20101208_AAAZGA pasch_j_Page_097.jp2
10b7bc6a7c76ecd4cbc340f9af3699eb
62e2493c5ef0fefbabbfa8d2bf708115f84c2206
376 F20101208_AABADE pasch_j_Page_129.txt
40f449c88746e18c6ce2b8dad5428da9
dcc9724c7de1cd4d414529a598489e182a457394
842916 F20101208_AAAZFN pasch_j_Page_084.jp2
f24682ecb306a6ef4bc7dd9ca2fb4582
fed48e40f10c4198f378814cac95682d67b852fb
108418 F20101208_AAAZEY pasch_j_Page_069.jp2
1598d96abbdfe12de17a01cada656747
677eba8c2d57456cdaf090b29e2bfd37eccb01f3
47712 F20101208_AAAYZS pasch_j_Page_122.jpg
e76e0446815a92cda09a9be6b0375d0f
708a3309f9da400ba4fa46d6eae07c59394388cf
67072 F20101208_AAAZGB pasch_j_Page_098.jp2
dd2d86ad148bdb14b89aaf96d9e157b5
96bd1458c3ef530501e3824cb2f952c5fbcba35d
F20101208_AABADF pasch_j_Page_130.txt
a37f560f0927023eda115c3d9acdb6c1
31bb179f47f3d146a2d8c60086b19cb783d875ea
1986 F20101208_AABACQ pasch_j_Page_115.txt
494f2b75a2125c77e537ec347ba7abbd
04c91a9845111a01dddd508d939a1e97749cf331
610441 F20101208_AAAZFO pasch_j_Page_085.jp2
88910fe8c901b97d7646fc16449d6af6
f2626f951961cbd70ce84b4dea9c40e7925ee11b
68226 F20101208_AAAZEZ pasch_j_Page_070.jp2
ae113ef767051ab515e2421b7b71a30c
580292440c2898dadc6969454f0d9439e3341232
81051 F20101208_AAAYZT pasch_j_Page_123.jpg
7ea1411e3899c0d85d6facc594bf77f0
7b5fd1169039cc72f528c2ad904b50d5b81059ce
16383 F20101208_AAAZGC pasch_j_Page_099.jp2
6b2fea58666ce376cd268e29acf39655
f9bd4634e8fe5eb400b7a8139e4c6c057038da28
314 F20101208_AABADG pasch_j_Page_131.txt
6df4ac6a23e121293629f17c2bdb36dd
aaf6ab6d5d767456c4ccd31538b91c63d7548ed3
2137 F20101208_AABACR pasch_j_Page_116.txt
a769329fc4042ce885cf5e73e56fa36f
1a5045530100ca8cafd7540b786ab4920d2d44fe
785754 F20101208_AAAZFP pasch_j_Page_086.jp2
bdb251e6eda06745145ccae3e1ac06ca
ad99243be3c86764cbf52ce9daee0b0fe56b9d44
53292 F20101208_AAAYZU pasch_j_Page_124.jpg
01b87c06f49b50cdec91e9c718b55b7e
556442ed1eeabf68136d4c8eec7940274404c9ce
69254 F20101208_AAAZGD pasch_j_Page_100.jp2
0f80ff61e18954ee49aace150789348d
23c9befc5968ee918c0c538fa686486d6e361a07
360 F20101208_AABADH pasch_j_Page_132.txt
dba25b849656547e9cd9a9b98cce0e5f
bf0a5ab3abaf0479c89f57e9332834092cfa5d5a
F20101208_AABACS pasch_j_Page_117.txt
f09b80d6e42126d388d91ecfce960f0f
ce307f3879ab1e30b0f1fed2155b65fe6eee8b5c
951456 F20101208_AAAZFQ pasch_j_Page_087.jp2
eff066d0a5cfc8133d578a7aba038cbd
ef76c999ef9042102a80f7dfef235bb4e378076a
55225 F20101208_AAAYZV pasch_j_Page_125.jpg
a332014efe71d575a4c7c1aa0c0cc820
e820f60afb4d4f07434ea4d5d20f49906632ba89
1051966 F20101208_AAAZGE pasch_j_Page_101.jp2
f816950acc02a3e7cbcd8861eac697ab
c9e8ebd67cffd5cca5e37d5e90ccb37ea4616b94
370 F20101208_AABADI pasch_j_Page_133.txt
9d04eac0e9459104493528f8d43cbc84
58f4f3586e1678c2517797687ba819565de9a6be
2151 F20101208_AABACT pasch_j_Page_118.txt
b7531e9ef1b286a29957a0afa60d39e1
5f524825fb2d97cc7b6f36dd69b165029f2ed15a
319376 F20101208_AAAZFR pasch_j_Page_088.jp2
d2b0ee4b0e9d646a1edc2474bde04c02
236e07a8531d2660e8b0ea99fc138159276b3ea8
53126 F20101208_AAAYZW pasch_j_Page_126.jpg
95f8240ffce4e588e629f1d78d3402e2
1750c2fe8b9d7817684bcfa4200148d6ee0e6fd8
575841 F20101208_AAAZGF pasch_j_Page_102.jp2
08ad1d036feed67ab51fb8bd2923a9ba
c00cdbb14a2bdf9ba4a1ec2f047de0aadbc39741
357 F20101208_AABADJ pasch_j_Page_134.txt
6ca7766eac09199ac7645324d64ec5ef
929ab6a9d6566b51c936e3bcce378bbca1c29450
2203 F20101208_AABACU pasch_j_Page_119.txt
9cf95d47b46b531c632bd7884af71db9
a9cc9cdd8d96df75958b7697c35ae454b53ce5a6
42367 F20101208_AAAZFS pasch_j_Page_089.jp2
bc35839f5d3d35afb7cd6fdcecc97081
bbd6863814d943573d4ba10d1c73697e61a84b97
56007 F20101208_AAAYZX pasch_j_Page_127.jpg
15b89dc3b5f9f460ef38540fe471e886
8e328d47c32a827cab033c647c627f4a3ccfddb2
850882 F20101208_AAAZGG pasch_j_Page_103.jp2
b4a2ff9683b7755983a85b65b76f871d
94b2a79c744a086341220c004d1e9b5cd2f69f8c
336 F20101208_AABADK pasch_j_Page_135.txt
820b3e9997c20b97413060f24c86bf89
7b384b4b2346293d2bf83e354361086aad06b7cc
1080 F20101208_AABACV pasch_j_Page_120.txt
17f590220c13274213d8cec7d54af408
ec19c733c90f6027a8caaed9933e9b228f592d9c
93308 F20101208_AAAZFT pasch_j_Page_090.jp2
77052fdfb22cc0bbfe47dcd678c3818d
fa66cf48aa34937389e8224af00d74e0c813e29a
55651 F20101208_AAAYZY pasch_j_Page_128.jpg
79b35b069a7f74df57423d99af814f68
a88f96067b7d0fbc70c2f00373bb9a0571990e50
1051976 F20101208_AAAZGH pasch_j_Page_104.jp2
1e41a328ef1b658690f89a394449041c
65bb1df3f248002d165ec855bcc2a5477f984e44
432 F20101208_AABADL pasch_j_Page_136.txt
4de701ba472fb16537765a9347dd156f
dbc84a6e163c6e1f40dac6a3fc35a955148a1a0e
1275 F20101208_AABACW pasch_j_Page_121.txt
e569f10606cc47e2cd884d58be8bf5ba
6abd3a60a75aaa80258ce93698d3b32a26d27630
114561 F20101208_AAAZFU pasch_j_Page_091.jp2
afa178b81330f0cfce5b88ca71ca5203
62c7069f5e700ea08e904614f6220cc6643b002b
54544 F20101208_AAAYZZ pasch_j_Page_129.jpg
58c17c2e8430d1a9fdcf4dbdb005a364
b77fd95c196df28ec83ac8a6a8dd5cf33749bf30
344606 F20101208_AAAZGI pasch_j_Page_105.jp2
019d11d6836d1c84b4bdc0ce9c4d118d
b695dcad2daf4ddce6376c980f779445c84ae2ad
220 F20101208_AABAEA pasch_j_Page_151.txt
4dce5e911d489e05f351a660797beb0a
c9b87d132d30d7ee6ac8f6625c318444b5c6ea94
302 F20101208_AABADM pasch_j_Page_137.txt
d0e3f3b4f1a99883e000ab7c5e909ba0
15bdedd6c8867ad41eaad8bbfee548ea3f60d31a
F20101208_AABACX pasch_j_Page_122.txt
786af0f75c4cfcd44ed75951d129f6e0
483af7afbb020ef0ab4032ce178e2bff21b3be54
113148 F20101208_AAAZFV pasch_j_Page_092.jp2
8b0345a2470909d48b84ceaa5274a791
27b43f1d266a9b571588d82c50e7831edba6bebb
100350 F20101208_AAAZGJ pasch_j_Page_106.jp2
0f969a90587498da03eb22959af4e780
069592bfd033d96cdf47c36dfed6c7aea3a5bea9
199 F20101208_AABAEB pasch_j_Page_152.txt
5c91c83903c089b34c94c62ab8a46820
6e77ac36a0f4708e37910bc41d33bc8aa540239d
334 F20101208_AABADN pasch_j_Page_138.txt
ef2ad83741becd56a168873d1408e5a1
9cd3f80757a9c810e00488e87a42517910de75f5
234 F20101208_AABACY pasch_j_Page_123.txt
d6318ddbc1c448e5e37825560efa65f1
1d33c2ae8a0c95905edd2f3624e22c4ebc61fe17
111458 F20101208_AAAZFW pasch_j_Page_093.jp2
0001e29963db7861199e026ed42b7a10
5f8f67581611f516045ca5ffbc9cca821ddb90b4
107724 F20101208_AAAZGK pasch_j_Page_107.jp2
791bfa3d6139eaa0ffa943a984dd5199
4aeb532f89067f51a8613072f96d17c22e626194
282 F20101208_AABAEC pasch_j_Page_153.txt
705fa1c77b00992183d95925279618c6
0757742443ce489a76db08b2401709d641778563
418 F20101208_AABADO pasch_j_Page_139.txt
a69e84ea822c913fe97aa96cc2b01738
7d47703610e907005f8e0bcd3439eaa4b3e3bb77
399 F20101208_AABACZ pasch_j_Page_124.txt
9479852aa1b8a9debf451bed808fac7e
506056a61ed3d5bf6c4ef0917c4eb4edfc78b0bc
114263 F20101208_AAAZFX pasch_j_Page_094.jp2
9161d6472b7f55613df08a8119def055
e7bd30b2d12883c6b8efed48c0cc0496df2e8d10
100307 F20101208_AAAZGL pasch_j_Page_108.jp2
f7b41c996e5e6afad4925476d0a756bf
1f59d1429fa586d2ca8976afdb540604cd2abd57
355 F20101208_AABAED pasch_j_Page_154.txt
7175003aea8f8f788a50c284ac3b16fc
02160810b415af7f02948309106552db41f61841
268 F20101208_AABADP pasch_j_Page_140.txt
290ae97377077a5b4a24f348168555e3
cfea22a32d542225eea0de574b90e1f64507eb24
115212 F20101208_AAAZFY pasch_j_Page_095.jp2
725dc28c0f9ff792d661c7261e9a3d4a
a2c2f8b0a3abf56df3c49e65268b4545d9455986
1051964 F20101208_AAAZHA pasch_j_Page_123.jp2
0365e0522ab0ac4d254529ca04bf4d07
30c3a3f5d45b2c94f28f1a92d56227ea33d93926
108587 F20101208_AAAZGM pasch_j_Page_109.jp2
efe40e1882372563423d2ed784faca33
44fb4d81fb41550a363d1b540ddcac548da0ffce
260 F20101208_AABAEE pasch_j_Page_155.txt
668b286d5ab5fe9a86fd5d4622f00869
1115f3135f3a4532d78a9513ab7b29557a431a38
224 F20101208_AABADQ pasch_j_Page_141.txt
ebbac15a92040cef7cc2a484e2071eb5
87dc5414cecc16c349b603f111a85a472feb2577
569904 F20101208_AAAZHB pasch_j_Page_124.jp2
896c7caa7980ff4e9dd972aab44cd751
5c4f058272f73bdf6cdf52b9efbe533797ba9bf0
110966 F20101208_AAAZGN pasch_j_Page_110.jp2
2bccb7c0f7a6813ef2477f3acd6cc92c
75e54bb57decd582c1bd032b6e75b84a6e8a14cd
312 F20101208_AABAEF pasch_j_Page_156.txt
7d250c7ec6c52d89e5d27b2151fb34ca
a63a17048affaaa75dc3bdb65a9cfad58387807a
111315 F20101208_AAAZFZ pasch_j_Page_096.jp2
ab07614d62d960b17c998d7d8f6178f4
18691f1529fb9a4f82c89814bb9cd9afd2de0c7d
581978 F20101208_AAAZHC pasch_j_Page_125.jp2
1b54de32ed601f71007b94dc41897433
dabf5991011b96deec68d8d23f64b25019083183
109553 F20101208_AAAZGO pasch_j_Page_111.jp2
123062c89787fc8cf2553bb428a4f95e
d4a139473ecf337e8e2dd09c30e7f70a99ba921e
F20101208_AABAEG pasch_j_Page_157.txt
4e30763c7090ae2c9c28a01aff0d24e5
15058119d73b2250d8de711d10765c948b8d6abe
287 F20101208_AABADR pasch_j_Page_142.txt
168aa38d77f5e07d5c9a474bf028b8a2
1102b8c691cb2132c2882f8a7bfdc9b0d9c36665
587515 F20101208_AAAZHD pasch_j_Page_126.jp2
980a7320922a2d9943b829a342039ee1
7b84a1c82f01a34b56f932ee5ca037584f14245e
95096 F20101208_AAAZGP pasch_j_Page_112.jp2
0c0400d9bd124dd6c76f11b95f998b4a
e7b0da5ff991af3dde019d06cd92139a5dded91a
249 F20101208_AABAEH pasch_j_Page_158.txt
202ab401434454b48dc356ff36be3e22
8e3c8005ee5b4d334868864e03bfa5e066a64237
216 F20101208_AABADS pasch_j_Page_143.txt
f30f7a90364846f2cda5b1170c663ab8
81e7e82d7aa8942043fd6825c5a3e4fa8a06fc1a
588984 F20101208_AAAZHE pasch_j_Page_127.jp2
aec08382b0d5ff6e33385ec3ec4f9661
e03f65e7db810528d67f2719f919ba202828c5af
120378 F20101208_AAAZGQ pasch_j_Page_113.jp2
5da8e7a5d07f0b35441520a0df177478
3c04db7863cd1a0dc2fb7d3a6151c733f383dde3
245 F20101208_AABAEI pasch_j_Page_159.txt
b717faa040c1159e629ae00a961f3321
66f2460064c9b0f81b78350732ab02f48e5fb7c0
238 F20101208_AABADT pasch_j_Page_144.txt
1b714f046e973f2849af29ebbfbb0889
8e7376a2aa000f343c4d6336a5736e36b836137a
576478 F20101208_AAAZHF pasch_j_Page_128.jp2
b6e656a40aaa9a2e290c9dbdf3c7fe61
bbb8850c25726e00474e04e0030d14b373ca467e
108965 F20101208_AAAZGR pasch_j_Page_114.jp2
732a7e3e806b3a8edb59fa583409f8a7
f062f0132d9313c1a2cd83ca170aaae8fe524f40
313 F20101208_AABAEJ pasch_j_Page_160.txt
bd835e24a4c1ce3e31da22aeb5d49879
5b8156282bcc5af46c4a09aaa91e419b064a0dd2
F20101208_AABADU pasch_j_Page_145.txt
629536eb478d24730852726e23eb2bd2
2a85b2ad2774634c2108c91e9c94b8db79055120
557704 F20101208_AAAZHG pasch_j_Page_129.jp2
a1b25dc73e977d762c997b8921bcf55d
ce39f86b73016a2a19fad62015269d0e8a9fd539
99038 F20101208_AAAZGS pasch_j_Page_115.jp2
f85d6f804e2ac3c9b21d3bee2d177bcc
5cfcafcc9cf2d14fbc073acf34bdd6c8b33b9a24
351 F20101208_AABAEK pasch_j_Page_161.txt
af5bedae198c1cf8f0904169460e9228
2c265539a3e27fe8c34b232fce8a76e1d981628f
279 F20101208_AABADV pasch_j_Page_146.txt
34023f5f537d5883aa3d269975bf2dfb
5b5ad248b622056c9a08e71711a6fe8560f30f2a
582987 F20101208_AAAZHH pasch_j_Page_130.jp2
85c1f37624c88f4c51503ca047d8fc46
acb6e322c9326b0ef09f7f805dc85cbc4563309d
111842 F20101208_AAAZGT pasch_j_Page_116.jp2
4f561eeadebb562d7db1992e05292ff6
0862d6f2843b04fd5f6bd23a6ccadb5fea07d89f
349 F20101208_AABAEL pasch_j_Page_162.txt
85c9b43b31de6f239087918e4b8d81d1
a42c89a152f8c9010724a6cd61cd92bc436b85da
181 F20101208_AABADW pasch_j_Page_147.txt
d303be4ba7c5fec2a3223a52b751aa8f
e4b04fa66ff855d99aaea936c46d319d27c5b589
578932 F20101208_AAAZHI pasch_j_Page_131.jp2
64644215d4622f3adee77ecf2a73a137
05bc9b557fabcb39ba5ff6da2f5c72acddbfa5b6
114753 F20101208_AAAZGU pasch_j_Page_117.jp2
76edaa42c9c7e106c4788c4c467ce9fb
a254d0c2e18cd55a954b7c9ad9efec4af91a19c8
615 F20101208_AABAFA pasch_j_Page_177.txt
2a6754d2c9ccc1f1dfa41332379c49eb
17f8453035da9044b67e4fa77a15928936ae64c4
284 F20101208_AABAEM pasch_j_Page_163.txt
8a6b18d70882d60c542bdb54ca5a8a48
9d025e06dfd9d8d9a9871c570870a0ff7623cdf8
243 F20101208_AABADX pasch_j_Page_148.txt
cc2f89e44926dd53dfe44616d213c9a8
ce9b42f74ad3c066e20791daab7e7d8addd32832
576991 F20101208_AAAZHJ pasch_j_Page_132.jp2
c059e7fbb17467e04e3ad7dd662be8c2
7a33240f87a0b420b41325e6814d2c38585f2f13
112913 F20101208_AAAZGV pasch_j_Page_118.jp2
a5e2b729ce9a0905091984e6730646b9
3407a4ff56facfa8b7605878ce9e6ca37172b34d
462 F20101208_AABAFB pasch_j_Page_178.txt
b6c532939b80774d3d17074d0518a18d
9dfd264910453cbcd0315555eb094f94667fb0bd
250 F20101208_AABAEN pasch_j_Page_164.txt
e713305732f65918b2cfa79200acff88
d2426d6b4b31b7c9bfc1918e9759b4fb4fd2f6cc
F20101208_AABADY pasch_j_Page_149.txt
f95ad8345722ff601e0dfd3ba1d49ced
f99d227dd106c901dac7fc722e2d58e443b02ced
588185 F20101208_AAAZHK pasch_j_Page_133.jp2
fba18a84ce51e41393724facad5ba5ef
cfe474f7905fbcfb699181141d9e6f2e9e756ccf
116323 F20101208_AAAZGW pasch_j_Page_119.jp2
d658992e7c384c2d92f1cf8dda7fd4a9
9f248999e268655e1e5e205b2e105cb022ce1b3a
424 F20101208_AABAFC pasch_j_Page_179.txt
9cb9187d66f3a0ec738f8092625ce986
cc3044a16595bd8c31302d842cacb9806e21c270
F20101208_AABAEO pasch_j_Page_165.txt
975b1322e18b50827211a131a56f29f4
dfbc5b38ac9e2fe4cf995062bc9ca221d62a3e4b
251 F20101208_AABADZ pasch_j_Page_150.txt
ca82242ca9bcca18b017f3f4c440446d
446df9b44b5a075b274e97c67a4a975552a4aace
590596 F20101208_AAAZHL pasch_j_Page_134.jp2
8f7f0c101609b9640b347cf1232a5cab
66bc9f1148f7c23b0f922e9f97ff53cc4b779d98
59752 F20101208_AAAZGX pasch_j_Page_120.jp2
59eff28ed21d7eed1c204a9d3494bc5e
d742f22ada14b0d78c88d2b458f0e2c368908b11
2095 F20101208_AABAFD pasch_j_Page_180.txt
7e50c6338c9e5677c45fe033e17febc1
0692a822851ff67ca68b836b3a2f4ecba76298eb
F20101208_AABAEP pasch_j_Page_166.txt
72aafcd5671ba3bd687ca6675bdd08a6
6efbdd30b03b1df44e6ea50200a38597584388ce
618931 F20101208_AAAZIA pasch_j_Page_149.jp2
e1b74a33d0d00312cf3c68610d57a0a3
9b5c48f3ce8a5f2d8ac6b4be94ad0b4badff3c9a
595011 F20101208_AAAZHM pasch_j_Page_135.jp2
ccf832802553afa1915c7febd2076ec1
1b2a6a161e2c39f106b70f3923e7381ed77834cd
67414 F20101208_AAAZGY pasch_j_Page_121.jp2
00e3a1040c4fd4d5b1023a76695348d6
825932c9cb57af97d719f40be1ad7eb51055fc63
F20101208_AABAFE pasch_j_Page_181.txt
e14dd91fe75348138bb09d9c5c29a28e
9abc3ee56abc0ad490c83ef898270d92f88313ae
415 F20101208_AABAEQ pasch_j_Page_167.txt
ba4cb32a07559782b8bcd06dde098730
869e185ab7feaa20719561ae5cb41cbeb904ce59
585173 F20101208_AAAZIB pasch_j_Page_150.jp2
910987fd4c678770b05c76b6c39f658f
087565cccb654b60c08f068d7bfae3880b8044fd
598325 F20101208_AAAZHN pasch_j_Page_136.jp2
7e84fbf60114aa5f1512a0ec5cf817f7
25df39462527f8a9fe5d38c9435e037e8f843765
734278 F20101208_AAAZGZ pasch_j_Page_122.jp2
925f9a9832dd5ed604243652d21e923a
bc6634c79996182690b847f8456f437496a09a5e



PAGE 1

PRESSURE DROP AND HEAT TRANSFER IN INVERTED FILM BOILING HYDROGEN By JAMES PASCH A DISSERTATION PRESENTED TO THE GRADUATE SCHOOL OF THE UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA 2006 1

PAGE 2

Copyright 2006 by James Pasch 2

PAGE 3

The effort put forth over the last four and a half years to complete this Ph.D. is dedicated to my children, Nicholas and Connor. This is one component in my continuing efforts to be a good father and role model for them. Life is much more interesting and rewarding when you remain challenged. 3

PAGE 4

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I would like to thank Dr. Samim Anghaie for agreeing to work with me on this effort that started four and half years ago. I understand that working with a long-distance student is difficult all the more reason I appreciate his patient support to achieve this goal. I thank my wife, Melynda, who supported my efforts by giving me time to study. I express my gratitude for having a great and supportive family; John and Alice Pasch, brother Jack, and sisters Alison and Lorelei. I also express my gratitude to Robert Hendricks for giving freely of his memories of these experiments in which he was centrally involved. His efforts, then and now, provide the engineering community with unique information. 4

PAGE 5

TABLE OF CONTENTS page ACKNOWLEDGMENTS ...............................................................................................................4 LIST OF TABLES ...........................................................................................................................7 LIST OF FIGURES .........................................................................................................................8 ABSTRACT ...................................................................................................................................16 Chapter 1 INTRODUCTION AND STATE OF THE ART...................................................................18 Introduction.............................................................................................................................18 Motivation.......................................................................................................................18 Objectives........................................................................................................................19 Pressure Drop..........................................................................................................................20 Heat Transfer..........................................................................................................................23 2 MODELLING APPROACHES FOR TWO-PHASE FLOW................................................38 Angular Simplifications..........................................................................................................38 Basic Models..........................................................................................................................38 Flow Regime Analysis............................................................................................................40 3 TEST DATA DESCRIPTION AND EVALUATION AND MODEL DEVELOPMENT....44 Description of Experiments....................................................................................................44 Experimental Setup.........................................................................................................44 Experimental Conditions.................................................................................................45 Heat Leaks.......................................................................................................................46 Instrumentation................................................................................................................46 Data Validation.......................................................................................................................49 Comparison with Similar Data........................................................................................49 End Effects......................................................................................................................51 Hydrogen States: Parahydrogen and Orthohydrogen......................................................55 Model Development...............................................................................................................58 Nature of Data.................................................................................................................60 Magnitude of Radiation Heating.....................................................................................63 Conservation Equations...................................................................................................64 Entrance Lengths.............................................................................................................66 Boundary Conditions.......................................................................................................68 Closure Conditions..........................................................................................................70 Vapor superheat........................................................................................................70 Liquid energy flow...................................................................................................71 5

PAGE 6

Wall friction.............................................................................................................74 Model Implementation....................................................................................................75 4 ANALYSIS AND VALIDATION OF MOMENTUM MODEL RESULTS........................90 Data Referencing....................................................................................................................90 Data Refinement.....................................................................................................................90 Omitted Data...................................................................................................................90 Problematic Data.............................................................................................................90 Data Representation.........................................................................................................93 Problematic Runs.............................................................................................................93 Vapor Superheat..............................................................................................................95 Model Results.........................................................................................................................96 Validation of Model Results...................................................................................................97 Range of Validity....................................................................................................................98 5 EVALUATION AND CORRELATION OF DATA AND CORRELATION ASSESSMENT.....................................................................................................................106 Data Correlation....................................................................................................................106 Low Pressure Slip Correlation..............................................................................................111 Low Pressure Slip Correlation Assessment..........................................................................113 High Pressure Slip Correlation.............................................................................................115 High Pressure Slip Correlation Assessment.........................................................................115 Accuracy of the Slip Correlations.........................................................................................116 Validation of the Slip Correlations.......................................................................................118 Observations.........................................................................................................................119 6 HEAT TRANSFER ANALYSIS.........................................................................................168 Data Omission......................................................................................................................168 The Nature of IFB Heat Transfer..........................................................................................168 The General HTC Profile..............................................................................................169 An Interpretation of Controlling Effects in IFB Heat Transfer.....................................170 Assessment of Various Models............................................................................................172 7 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS...............................................................180 General Conclusions.............................................................................................................180 Pressure Drop Conclusions and Recommendations......................................................181 Heat Transfer Conclusions and Recommendations.......................................................182 Recommendations for Future Efforts...................................................................................182 LIST OF REFERENCES.............................................................................................................184 BIOGRAPHICAL SKETCH.......................................................................................................190 6

PAGE 7

LIST OF TABLES Table page 3-1. Table of experimental conditions..........................................................................................77 3-2. Comparison of Core et al. and Hendricks et al. heat transfer coefficients............................78 3-3. Comparison of heat transfer coefficients for Wright and Walters data and TN 765.............79 3-4. Summary of test conditions for major hydrogen heat transfer studies..................................79 3-5. Result of parametric sensitivity study of end axial heat conduction.....................................79 3-6. Tube wall axial heat transfer analysis....................................................................................79 4-1. List of tube numbers, dimensions, and runs executed with the tubes...................................99 4-2. Statistical analysis of pressure data.....................................................................................100 5-1. Accuracies of some common slip correlations....................................................................121 5-2. Comparison of pressure drop prediction accuracies............................................................122 6-1. Comparison of predictive accuracy of various IFB models................................................176 7

PAGE 8

LIST OF FIGURES Figure page 2-1. Various flow regimes for IFB................................................................................................43 2-2. Flow regime map generated by Takenaka for IFB (1989)....................................................43 3-1. TN 765 experimental setup....................................................................................................80 3-2. TN 3095 experimental setup..................................................................................................81 3-3. 1961 data test section.............................................................................................................82 3-4. TN 3095 test section..............................................................................................................83 3-5. TN 3095 instrumentation.......................................................................................................84 3-6. Nodal distribution and heat generation distribution used to model end effects....................85 3-7. Radial metal temperature profiles as a function of metal thermal conductivity....................85 3-8. Radial metal temperature profiles as a function of metal thickness......................................86 3-9. Effect of specified parameters on tube end wall axial heat transfer......................................86 3-10. Difference in wall to liquid temperature for all data considered.........................................87 3-11. Wall to liquid hydrogen temperature differences for four runs...........................................87 3-12. Theoretical liquid core temperature profile at the exit of the heated test section................88 3-13. Flow diagram for momentum and energy analysis of data.................................................89 4-1. Sample of 1961 data wall temperatures...............................................................................101 4-2. Tube 3 exhibits a consistent reduction in wall temperature at 34 cm..................................101 4-3. Comparison of runs 7 and 8 pressure profiles.....................................................................102 4-4. Run 14 energy and momentum balances.............................................................................102 4-5. Results of modifying the coefficient in Burmeisters equation...........................................103 4-6. Culled data momentum and energy balance results from model.........................................103 4-7. Calculated void fraction from model for the culled data set...............................................104 4-8. Velocity slip ratio vs quality from model for the culled data set........................................104 8

PAGE 9

4-9. Void fraction vs. equilibrium quality for three runs of Ottosens experiments...................105 5-1. Vapor velocity vs. superficial velocity................................................................................122 5-2. Comparison of model slip and slip predicted from correlations.........................................123 5-3. Predicted versus measured pressure gradients for all data used in correlating slip.............123 5-4. Model and prediction results for run 1.................................................................................124 5-5. Model and prediction results for run 2.................................................................................125 5-6. Model and prediction results for run 3.................................................................................126 5-7. Model and prediction results for run 4.................................................................................127 5-8. Model and prediction results for run 5.................................................................................128 5-9. Model and prediction results for run 6.................................................................................129 5-10. Model and prediction results for run 7...............................................................................130 5-11. Model and prediction results for run 9...............................................................................131 5-12. Model and prediction results for run 10.............................................................................132 5-13. Model and prediction results for run 11.............................................................................133 5-14. Model and prediction results for run 12.............................................................................134 5-15. Model and prediction results for run 13.............................................................................135 5-16. Model and prediction results for run 15.............................................................................136 5-17. Model and prediction results for run 16.............................................................................137 5-18. Model and prediction results for run 17.............................................................................138 5-19. Model and prediction results for run 18.............................................................................139 5-20. Model and prediction results for run 19.............................................................................140 5-21. Model and prediction results for run 20.............................................................................141 5-22. Model and prediction results for run 21.............................................................................142 5-23. Model and prediction results for run 33.............................................................................143 5-24. Model and prediction results for run 34.............................................................................144 9

PAGE 10

5-25. Model and prediction results for run 35.............................................................................145 5-26. Model and prediction results for run 37.............................................................................146 5-27. Model and prediction results for run 38.............................................................................147 5-28. Model and prediction results for run 39.............................................................................148 5-29. Model and prediction results for run 40.............................................................................149 5-30. Model and prediction results for run 41.............................................................................150 5-31. Model and prediction results for run 42.............................................................................151 5-32. Model and prediction results for run 43.............................................................................152 5-33. Model and prediction results for run 45.............................................................................153 5-34. Model and prediction results for run 46.............................................................................154 5-35. Model and prediction results for run 47.............................................................................155 5-36. Model and prediction results for run 48.............................................................................156 5-37. Model and prediction results for run 49.............................................................................157 5-38. Model and prediction results for run 50.............................................................................158 5-39. Model and prediction results for run 51.............................................................................159 5-40. Model and prediction results for run 23.............................................................................160 5-41. Model and prediction results for run 24.............................................................................161 5-42. Model and prediction results for run 25.............................................................................162 5-43. Model and prediction results for run 27.............................................................................163 5-44. Model and prediction results for run 32.............................................................................164 5-45. Model and prediction results for run 36.............................................................................165 5-46. Model and prediction results for run 44.............................................................................166 5-47. Model and prediction results for run 8...............................................................................167 6-1. Variation of the HTC as a function of quality in IFB flow.................................................176 6-2. Variation of HTC versus equilibrium quality in the IAFB flow regime.............................177 10

PAGE 11

6-3. Variation of HTC versus mass quality for runs 39-42.........................................................177 6-4. Variation of HTC versus mass quality for runs 44-47.........................................................178 6-5. Variation of Dittus-Boelter vapor properties with pressure and temperature.....................178 6-6. Comparison of predicted HTC using the TN 3095 correlation with the experimental.......179 6-7. Comparison of predicted HTC using the modified equilibrium bulk Dittus-Boelter..........179 11

PAGE 12

NOMENCLATURE A area AIAFB agitated inverted annular film boiling A s surface area b y-intercept of line Bo boiling number C conversion constants for ortho-para conversion CHF critical heat flux Co Colburn number C 0 drift flux model distribution parameter c p specific heat at constant pressure c v specific heat at constant density D diameter DFB dispersed film boiling f friction factor F Chens enhancement factor f 1 low pressure slip correlating parameter f 2 high pressure slip correlating parameter Fr Froude number G mass flux G 0 reference mass flux Gr Grasshof number 12

PAGE 13

g gravity h mass-specific enthalpy h, or HTC heat transfer coefficient IAFB inverted annular film boiling IFB inverted film boiling ISFB inverted slug film boiling j superficial velocity k thermal conductivity K conversion factor for ortho-para conversion L length LOCA loss of coolant accident m slope of line n number density Nu Nusselt number p pressure Pr Prandtl number q heat flux q 0 reference heat flux Q heat flow rate r radial direction, radial distance Re Reynolds number s velocity slip S Chens suppression factor 13

PAGE 14

t time T temperature u velocity w mass flow rate x mass quality x eq equilibrium quality z elevation Greek symbols void fraction volumetric quality T temperature differential Lockheed-Martinelli parameter friction multiplier viscosity density surface tension, Stefan-Boltzmann constant shear stress specific volume Subscripts av average b bulk 14

PAGE 15

c cross section calc calculated CL centerline crit critical condition exp experimental f film conditions h hydraulic i inlet, interface int y-intercept l liquid phase lo all fluid flowing as liquid m mean conditions mac macroscopic, in Chens correlation mic microscopic, in Chens correlation o orthohydrogen p parahydrogen rad radiation s saturated conditions slope slope tt turbulent-turbulent liquid-vapor phases TP two-phase v vapor phase w wall 15

PAGE 16

Abstract of Dissertation Presented to the Graduate School of the University of Florida in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy PRESSURE DROP AND HEAT TRANSFER IN INVERTED FILM BOILING HYDROGEN By James Pasch December 2006 Chair: Samim Anghaie Major: Nuclear Engineering Sciences Two-phase boiling hydrogen pressure drop and heat transfer is studied in the context of high velocity upflow in a constant, high heat flux, steady state, internal pipe flow environment. These data were generated by NASA in the early and mid 1960s in support of the manned space flight programs. Measurements taken were local pressure, temperature, and voltage drop. System measurements included mass flow rate, and test section inlet and discharge pressure and temperature. This effort establishes the nature of the flow as inverted film boiling, which has been studied to some degree. In this structure, the wall temperatures are too hot to allow liquid to remain at the surface. Therefore, a vapor film is established at the wall throughout the flow. The approach of this analysis is to reverse-engineer the data to determine mass quality, void fraction, and velocity slip. This is accomplished by applying a one-dimensional, five-equation model, with pressure gradient being the one combined equation for the liquid and vapor phases. Other major assumptions are that all of the vapor is at the mean film temperature, and the liquid core experiences no sensible heating. The resulting velocity slips are correlated for high and low pressure conditions, with the cutoff established at 600 kPa. Good agreement is achieved between the pressures predicted 16

PAGE 17

using the slip correlations and the measured pressures. Results are in general significantly better than those from the homogeneous equilibrium model. Various established heat transfer coefficient models are also applied to these data. It is shown that pre-critical heat flux models fail absolutely to predict the heat transfer coefficient. It is further shown that film boiling models that focus on buoyancy fail as well. While all forced convection film boiling models are within a reasonable range of the data, recommendations for appropriate models are made. The range of pipe inlet conditions are 188 kPa to 1265 kPa, mass fluxes from 327 kg/m 2 -s to 3444 kg/m 2 -s, and heat fluxes from 294 kW/m 2 to 2093 kW/m 2 Two heated test section lengths are 30.5 cm. and 61.0 cm. long, and five different diameters range from 0.48 cm. to 1.29 cm. 17

PAGE 18

CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION AND STATE OF THE ART Introduction This dissertation investigates the state of understanding of and prediction capabilities for boiling hydrogen, and the needs for improving the current condition. It presents an engineering-based approach to improve on the prediction capabilities for pressure drop and heat transfer. Motivation Accurate predictions of pressure drop in and heat transfer from a pipe to hydrogen during forced convective two-phase flow benefit engineers throughout the life of a product. During the design phase, good pressure drop and heat transfer models will help the engineer reduce the uncertainty in the design parameters. During the product test and development phase, good models will help the engineer to correctly interpret test data, therefore allowing him to determine where modifications are necessary. During the use of the product, problems inevitably arise that require the engineer to search for the root cause. This investigation requires a good understanding of how the product will react under off-nominal operating conditions. Accurate, mechanistic models allow the engineer to perform this investigation with confidence that the thermal-hydraulics related results of the investigation are valid. The rocket industry uses liquid hydrogen as a fuel. Heat transfer to two-phase flowing hydrogen routinely occurs during three phases of rocket operation; fuel tanking, rocket engine conditioning, and possibly during rocket firing. Nuclear Thermal Propulsion (NTP) systems are powered by high temperature nuclear reactors that are used to heat up hydrogen propellant to temperatures in excess of 3,000 K. Hydrogen is the only viable propellant for the NTP systems because of its low molecular weight that generates the highest specific impulse (Isp) at the maximum operating temperatures of these reactors. Hydrogen is pumped at cryogenic 18

PAGE 19

temperatures and relatively high pressures to cool the rocket nozzle before entering the reactor core. Heat removal in the rocket nozzle and reactor core areas transform subcooled liquid hydrogen to superheated hydrogen gas. The evolution of hydrogen flow in the system involves two-phase flow and heat transfer under subcooled, saturated, and superheated thermodynamic conditions. In addition to the rockets, a nascent industry that may require modeling of this sort is the hydrogen-fueled car industry. Objectives This research effort includes a number of objectives. First, it is necessary to conduct a literature search to determine the best battery of two-phase hydrogen tests to analyze. Using the data from this test series, the next objective is to evaluate the quality of these data. The primary objective is to improve the accuracy of predicted pressure drop of and heat transfer to two-phase hydrogen in a forced convection, highly heated, internal pipe flow environment. Mechanistically-based models are preferred, but correlations that provide improvements to pressure drop and heat transfer predictions are considered acceptable. Since very high wall to bulk temperature ratios can reasonably be expected with liquid hydrogen flowing in a heated pipe, the effect of radial temperature variation will necessarily be included. This goal will include the generation of void fraction, quality, and slip information that must be evaluated against data. It is an objective to develop a predictive model for one or more of these parameters so the pressure drop can be predicted. An important criterion of success is to reproduce the pressure drop data with minimal error using the predictive model. Additionally, it is an objective to either improve on the accuracy of current heat transfer models, or at least review the current understanding of this subject and recommend models to use for two-phase hydrogen. 19

PAGE 20

Pressure Drop Pressure change for a vaporizing fluid is comprised of three contributing effects: momentum decrease due to increasing fluid velocity as it vaporizes, friction between the fluid and the wall, and pressure change due to a change in height of the fluid. From Collier (1981), these three terms for a homogeneous flow are dzudGadzdp (1.1) DufFdzdpTP22 (1.2) gzdzdp (1.3) In these equations, p is pressure, a refers to acceleration, F refers to friction, z refers to elevation, G is mass flux, u is velocity, f TP is the two-phase friction factor, is density, D is tube diameter, and g is gravity. The frictional term is often determined by calculating what the frictional loss would be if the entire flow were liquid, then applying a two-phase frictional multiplier. This method was developed by Lockhart, Martinelli, Nelson, and others at the University of California in the 1940s (Martinelli et al., 1944, 1946; Martinelli and Nelson, 1948; Lockhart and Martinelli, 1949). The form of their equation is 2loloFdzdpFdzdp (1.4) The two-phase frictional multiplier, lo 2 is modeled as a function of flow quality and system pressure. Determining this multiplier is the goal of much research, particularly since the research of Martinelli and coworkers was limited to atmospheric pressure. 20

PAGE 21

The frictional multiplier can take four different forms. Two of them develop from using only the liquid or vapor mass that is present in the flow and are represented by a single letter subscript l or v to indicate liquid or vapor. The other two develop from using the entire flow as either liquid or vapor, and have a two-letter subscript lo or vo to signify that the entire flow is liquid or vapor. Traditionally, liquid conditions are used in evaporating systems, and vapor conditions are used for condensing systems. Relations can be developed between these various frictional multipliers. A correlating parameter developed by Martinelli and his coworkers is X tt which they determined to have the following form 5.1.9.1lvvlttxx (1.5) In this equation, x is quality and is viscosity. The subscripts l and v refer to liquid and vapor phases, respectively. This parameter, in various similar forms, has been used to evaluate the frictional multipliers. The exact forms of the frictional multiplier models depend on the nature of the flow of the liquid and vapor phases turbulent or laminar. Thus, there are four combinations of turbulent/laminar flows. The currently preferred model for predicting the frictional multiplier was developed by Chisholm (1973). His model uses a property index, composed of the property terms in equation (1.5) above without the quality term. Mass flux is also a factor in his model. 22111xxBxvllo (1.6) B is a function of the saturated liquid and vapor densities and the flow regime combination of the two phases (i.e., turbulent-turbulent, turbulent-laminar, laminar-turbulent, or laminar-laminar), and x is quality. 21

PAGE 22

Hendricks et al. (1961) derived a version of X tt for the peculiar case of inverted annular flow. The primary difference in the derivation is the position of the phases in the flow. Martinelli et al. (1944) assumed that liquid was adjacent to the wall and vapor was at the tube core, or that the flow is homogeneous. For convective hydrogen, the flow is usually better described as separated and the phase adjacent to the wall is vapor, not liquid. However, Hendricks et al. (1961) determined that the correlating parameter, presented in equation (1.5), was the same in both cases. Papadimitriou and Skorek (1991) processed data from two of Hendricks tests with their one-dimensional thermohydraulic model THESEUS. They observed that the pressure drop due to viscous shear forces is about 100 times smaller than that caused by momentum change. The Chisholm (1973) method was used to model the two-phase friction multiplier. John Rogers at Los Alamos Laboratories contributed significantly to the understanding of parahydrogen flow friction characteristics in the 1960s (1963, 1968). His efforts included extending Martinellis friction multiplier quantification work beyond one atmosphere. His results were based upon theoretically determining the values of vapor void fraction and its derivative with respect to pressure at one atmosphere and at the critical point pressure with quality as a parameter, then interpolating the curves of void fraction verses pressure between these boundaries for the specified qualities. The empirical equation he developed for turbulent-turbulent flow as a result of his work is Ecritcritlpppppxx38187.8.1203966.01324.0111 (1.7) where 32695.1646.2896.1xxxE (1.8) 22

PAGE 23

In this equation, the subscript crit refers to the critical condition. Note that pressure is in atmospheres, x is quality, and the correlation gives the multiplier for the pressure drop for the liquid only in the tube, not for all the flow considered as liquid. Comparison of predicted versus experimental pressure drop with one set of parahydrogen data at various pressures indicated good agreement, with the error generally smaller at lower system pressures. More recent work on separated two-phase flow pressure drop and heat transfer with vapor core was performed by Fu and Klausner (1997). In their work, conservation of mass, momentum, and energy laws are applied with closure relationships for vapor-liquid interface friction, liquid film turbulent viscosity, turbulent Prandtl number, and liquid droplet entrainment rate. Their results compared with 12 data sets of upflow and downflow were good. Although this theory assumes a liquid film and vapor core, the general procedure may prove useful with inverted annular flow after making the appropriate modifications to the various correlations. Heat Transfer John Chen published a correlation in 1966 that was based on the superposition of heat transfer caused by forced convective flow and by bubble generation. These terms are referenced with subscripts mac and mic for macroscopic and microscopic effects. macmichhh (1.9) where ttlmacFhh (1.10) llwslswvlvllpllmicFSPTPPTThckhRe,00122.075.024.024.024.029.05.049.045.079.0 (1.11) h l is the heat transfer coefficient associated with single phase liquid flowing alone in the pipe. In this equation, k is thermal conductivity, c p is specific heat, is the surface tension, h lv is the heat 23

PAGE 24

of vaporization, T is the temperature, S is a boiling suppression terms, F is an enhancement term, and Re is the Reynolds number. The subscripts w and s refer to wall and saturation conditions. Dkhllll4.08.0PrRe023.0 (1.12) llDxG1Re (1.13) In the above equation, Pr is the Prandtl number. The model incorporated heat transfer data from water, methane, pentane, and cyclohexane in the form of two factors, F and S, that were applied to the two different heat transfer components. His model proved to be very successful. Modifications to the original model have been proposed. Collier provided curve fits for the factors F and S as a function of tt Shah (1984) developed a correlation for saturated flow boiling for both vertical and horizontal tubes as a function of the Colburn, boiling, and Froude numbers, represented as Co, Bo, and Fr. lelFrBoCofhh,, (1.14) where 5.08.01lvxxCo (1.15) lvGhqBo" (1.16) gDGFrlle22 (1.17) In the above equations, q is the heat flux. 24

PAGE 25

Schrock and Grossman (1959) reviewed vertical, upward flowing boiling heat transfer data for water with the following result; 66.0211ttlCBoChh (1.18) where C 1 and C 2 are constants with values of 7390 and 0.00015, respectively. Gungor and Winterton (1986, 1987) developed the following for vertical, convective flow boiling; 41.075.086.0130001vllmacxxBohh (1.19) Bjorge, Hall, and Rohsenow (1982) developed a correlation for vertical, internal, upward forced flow boiling for qualities above 0.05. Note that this correlation is a superposition of heat fluxes as opposed to Chens superposition of heat transfer coefficients. swtotTTqh" (1.20) 3"""1swiswfdbfctotTTTTqqq (1.21) 29.0"RePrCTTDkFqlswllBfc (1.22) 32.02115.0ttttBF (1.23) llfCRe,Pr2 (1.24) 8/18/58/98/738/18/198/172/12/1"svllvlswvplllvllvlMfdbThTTckghBq (1.25) 25

PAGE 26

lvlvlfcsiswhkhTTT 8 (1.26) In the above equation, is the specific volume. Kandlikar (1990) developed the correlation below for vertical and horizontal flow boiling heat transfer in tubes; KCCleClmacFBoCFrCoChh4523125 (1.27) where the constants C 1 through C 5 can each take on two different values depending on the Colburn number. The value of the constant F K depends upon the fluid being modeled. Hendricks et al. (1961) performed experiments with hydrogen flowing inside a highly heated tube. Nusselt numbers were determined from measurements. The deviation from these measurements that the calculated Nusselt numbers generate approaches 80% at large values of Martinelli parameters, and roughly 40% at low values. As a result, the researchers found it necessary to curve fit the Nusselt number ratio as a function of the Martinelli parameter. This technique significantly improved the predictive accuracy, with most experimental Nusselt numbers lying within 15% of the curve fit. The model for the Nusselt number, Nu, that Hendricks et al. published for their forced convective heat transfer for flowing hydrogen was as follows: fttfcalcfNuNu,,exp,93.1611.0 (1.28) where 4.08.0,PrRe023.0ffcalcNu (1.29) and 26

PAGE 27

favmfDu ,Re (1.30) lfmfxx11, (1.31) The result of this method can be seen in Figure 1-1. Hendricks et al. (1966) developed a similar equation to correlate the combined subcritical data from TN 3095 (1966) and TN 765 with somewhat worse results due to data scatter. It is critical to note that this correlation excludes those data for which the thermodynamic equilibrium quality indicates subcooled flow. This excludes possibly up to one-third of the 612 points in the data set! The authors remarked that this equation should describe subcritical convective film-boiling data up to pressures near the critical pressure when non-equilibrium characteristics are small. The correlation based on the remaining data is 15.04.27.01,,exp,xttfmcalcfXNuNu (1.32) In this equation, subscript f refers to properties evaluated at the average of wall and bulk temperatures. Subscript fm refers to mean film conditions, e.g., using the density defined above with subscript f,m. These authors also developed a correlation based on a pseudo quality with similar results in accuracy. This correlation included some of the subcooled data, but far from all of it. Their assessment of this correlation was that it covered the liquid-hydrogen data for convective film boiling from a slightly subcooled state through two-phase and well into the superheat region. It should be noted that all models presented above perform very poorly on the data addressed in this dissertation. The exceptions, of course, are the models from TN 765 and TN 27

PAGE 28

3095. Chens (1966) model performed the best of all the others, while those of Shah (1984), Schrock and Grossman (1959), and Gungor and Winterton (1986, 1987) predict convection coefficients that are hundreds of times too high. This is due in large part to the form of the Reynolds number used by Hendricks et al. Heat transfer coefficient models have been developed that focus specifically on the flow structure of the data in this dissertation inverted film boiling (IFB). In general, the forms fall into two categories: those that attempt to capture the heat transfer mechanics of a highly convective flow, and those that focus on the effects of buoyancy. The convective models generally expand on the basic Dittus-Boelter model, while the buoyancy models usually take the form of the Bromley model (1950), which was developed for laminar film boiling, and is analogous to film condensation theory. These low velocity models are generally used to model Loss Of Coolant Accidents (LOCAs) in the nuclear industry. Bromleys model (1950) is an extension of theory developed by Nusselt (1916) for laminar film condensation on a horizontal tube. His heat transfer coefficient model for laminar film boiling from a horizontal tube is 4/1362.0TDhkghgfggggf (1.33) where h fg is the effective latent heat of vaporization accounting or vapor superheat. Numerous film boiling models expand on this basic form. Bromley et al. (1953) extended his own model to include forced convection. For low velocity flows, he determined the following: 4/1362.0TDhkghgfggggfco (1.34) 28

PAGE 29

where the subscript co refers to convection only excluding radiation heat transfer. T refers to the temperature delta between the wall and the centerline. For higher velocity flows, he proposed the following; 2/17.2TDhukhfgggco (1.35) Here, the enthalpy of vaporization is defined as 24.01fgpfgfghTChh (1.36) Berenson (1961) modified the Bromley model by incorporating the hydrodynamic instabilities predicted by Taylor instability theory. He published the following result; 4/12/13425.0gfsgfggggfgThkgh (1.37) The vapor properties are evaluated at the mean film temperature, liquid properties at saturation temperature, and 0.425 is used as a coefficient instead of the 0.62 in equation 1.34 above to account for enthalpy of vaporization to superheated conditions. The analogy to liquid film condensation has been extended to the assumption of turbulent flow in the vapor film. Wallis and Collier (1968) presented conclusions from this theory and offered 3/12.0*PrRe056.0Grkzzhgg (1.38) where the modified Grasshoff number is defined as 23*ggfggzGr (1.39) 29

PAGE 30

An obvious characteristic of the heat transfer coefficient models presented thus far is their inclusion of buoyancy effects. The models that focus on highly convective flows ignore buoyancy effects. In these models, heat transfer is quantified within the framework of the traditional Dittus-Boelter forced convection concept. Dougall and Rohsenow (1963) developed the following model for dispersed flow and inverted annular film boiling (IAFB) of Freon 113: 4.0,8.0,PrRe023.0svTPhsvDkh (1.40) where AxwwxDlsvhsvTP1Re,, (1.41) The velocity term applied here is the throughput velocity. This effort focused on low quality mass flows. In this equation, w is the mass flow rate, and the subscript s refers to saturation. A subsequent research program that focused on higher mass qualities was completed by Laverty and Rohsenow (1964, 1967). Their IFB nitrogen studies included visual analysis of the flow structure. Through theory, they determined that a significant amount of superheat was present in the vapor. As a result, they determined that it is impossible to obtain a simple expression for the overall heat transfer coefficient, although they did present a model for their data, presented below. Instead, they presented arguments based on the Dittus-Boelter model to set the upper bound and approximate value of the heat transfer coefficient. Their published model is as follows: DkDvhvvvbv4.08.0Pr023.0 (1.42) 30

PAGE 31

In this equation, the subscript b refers to bulk conditions. Forslund and Rohsenow (1968) also used nitrogen to improve the analysis of Laverty and Rohsenow (1964). Improvements focused on droplet breakup due to vapor acceleration, modified drag coefficients on accelerating droplets, and a Leidenfrost heat transfer from the wall to the droplets at lower qualities. Test conditions covered the quality range from saturation at the inlet to 35% to 315% at the exit. They focused on estimating the magnitude of departure from thermal equilibrium and droplet size. They concluded that vapor superheating was significant up to 50% in vapor quality. The heat transfer model they proposed, presented below, attempted to modify the Reynolds number to reflect conditions in the vapor: DkvvxxGDhvllvvvv8.04.08.01Pr019.0 (1.43) Kays (1980) presented an analysis for heat transfer between parallel plates. This model has been used by Hammouda (1996, 1997) in his modeling of IFB nitrogen. The Kays model is below. Note that the length dimension is the film thickness, vvvvkhRePr0028.0Pr071.5645.00439.0 (1.44) Bailey (1972) presented a buoyancy-based heat transfer model as follows: 25.032swvfgvlvvTTDvhgkh (1.45) Takenaka at Kobe University in Japan is associated with a number of IFB studies from the late 1980s and early 1990s. In general, his working fluids are R-113 and nitrogen flowing upward inside a vertical heated tube. Heat fluxes and mass velocities are generally an order of magnitude or more smaller than those addressed in this dissertation. His work is unique in that it 31

PAGE 32

is the only research found in the literature search that produced a flow regime map for IFB. Takenaka et al. (1989, 1990) found that heat transfer coefficients, as a function of equilibrium quality, did not vary with heat flux or inlet subcooling, but segregated consistently with mass flux. As a result, their IFB flow regime map uses mass flux and equilibrium quality as coordinates. As equilibrium quality increased, higher mass fluxes produced higher heat transfer coefficients at the same quality. They found that the Nusselt Number predicted using the Dougall-Rohsenow (1963) model were reasonably close to their data. Takenaka also worked with Fujii (Fujii et al. (2005)) to investigate pressure drop in IFB. Because the mass velocities are very low, the pressure drops measured in the nitrogen flow are in general much smaller than those exhibited in the data of this dissertation. They found that the pressure drop characteristics correspond well with the heat transfer characteristic map. Hammouda et al. (1996, 1997) investigated the effects of mass flux, inlet subcooling, and system pressure on the heat transfer coefficient using R-12, R-22, and R134a as the working fluids. The characteristic shape of the heat transfer coefficient as a function of equilibrium quality is consistent with those in Takenakas experiments. The effect of mass flux is the same, but varying the inlet subcooling measurably segregated Hammoudas data while Takenaka noted no such influence. Different results are also noted in the effect of heat flux on the heat transfer coefficient. While Hammoudas data show that higher heat flux increases the heat transfer coefficient, Takenakas data shows very little, if any, effect. Hammouda also observed that higher system pressure increases the heat transfer coefficient a parametric effect that Takenaka never investigated. Ishii has been involved with a number of experiments that focused on the flow regime characteristics and transition criteria of post-critical heat flux (IFB) flows. Ishii and De Jarlais 32

PAGE 33

(1986) investigated the basic hydrodynamics of this flow regime. The mechanisms that disintegrate the liquid core were investigated, as well as the formation and entrainment of droplets in the vapor annulus. The experimental portion of this work involved adiabatic two-phase flow, resulting in a flow regime transition criterion based on the Weber number. Ishii and De Jarlais (1987) presented experimental data for an idealized IFB flow generated by injecting a liquid inside a vapor annulus in up-flow using Freon 113. Fluid heating was incorporated into the test setup. Visual observations revealed the nature of the flow structure to include smooth IAFB, agitated inverted annular film boiling (AIAFB), followed by inverted slug film boiling (ISFB) and dispersed film boiling (DFB). Obot and Ishii (1988) extended this work with the same fluids and test setup. More extensive results of flow regime transition are presented. Ishii and Denten (1990) continued this work to investigate the effects of bubbles present before post-critical heat flux is attained on the IFB flow regimes and their transitions. Three regimes were observed; rough wavy, agitated, and dispersed ligament-droplet. They found that the flow pattern in IFB depends upon the nature of the pre-CHF flow. A general flow regime transition criterion between the agitated and dispersed droplet regimes is given based on conditions at dryout. This correlation includes void fraction at this point as an important parameter. Babelli et al. (1994) used the same experimental apparatus to continue the research. He concluded that the most significant flow regime is the agitated regime, since the large interfacial surface generated in this regime probably correlates with high momentum and heat transfer. A correlation for the axial extent of this flow regime was proposed, again dependent upon the void fraction at the point that CHF occurs. It should be noted that all of the work performed by Ishii and his associates was performed for the purpose of better understanding nuclear reactor LOCA. As such, the flow velocities are quite low compared with the data in this dissertation. 33

PAGE 34

Per Ottosen (1980) published the first known results from the use of -ray absorption to measure void fraction in low Reynolds number IFB nitrogen. He observed the transition from IAFB to DFB at void fractions between 80-90%. These void fractions were typically attained by the point at which equilibrium quality was 20%. Given that superheat will be present, this equilibrium quality probably relates to a lower actual quality. Since his work was in support of understanding LOCAs and reflooding, his fluid velocities were low. Also, the work was executed at a constant temperature condition instead of a constant heat flux condition, as is more often the case. Nonetheless, trends in heat transfer coefficients as a function of mass flux are evident. Experiments using hydrogen as the working fluid are rare. This is primarily because of the dangerous nature of the fluid. Hendricks (personal communication, 2005) relates that, in the series of experiments during 1961 and 1966, the building in which they worked was evacuated of people, and emergency personnel were notified of each experiment. It is determined through the literature search that the only published hydrogen experiments performed in the United States that present heat transfer data occurred in support of the manned space missions in the 1960s. Published results from hydrogen experiments in the Soviet Union and Europe, though they likely occurred, have not been found. Core et al. (1959) performed experiments with hydrogen similar to those in TN 3095, but with much fewer measuring points of pressure and temperature. Twenty-seven heat transfer tests with liquid hydrogen were completed in the series. Since only test section inlet and exit conditions were measured, the heat transfer coefficients calculated from these measured data are overall average coefficients for the entire tube. The authors did not present a theoretical correlation for the heat transfer coefficient. Their primary goal was to evaluate the utility of 34

PAGE 35

hydrogen as a regenerative rocket nozzle coolant. Nonetheless, the data from this study may be considered as complementary to the data of TN 3095, and therefore useful. Wright and Walters (1959) found that stable film boiling of hydrogen could occur for wall to bulk temperature differences as low as about 22 K to 28 K. Also, peak heat transfer coefficients were about 10% of the magnitudes of those in nucleate boiling. Their film boiling heat transfer coefficients were almost constant over the range of wall to bulk temperature differences of 22 K to 167 K. Papadimitriou (1991) presented results of a simulated rocket engine two-phase hydrogen chilldown process using a modified form of Dougall and Rohsenow model in the computer program THESEUS. The modification is a temperature correction, 5.0WvTT (1.46) applied as a multiplier on the model for the heat transfer coefficient. It was stated that this better accounts for the real film conditions at high wall temperatures. Many of the above forced convection models are based on the classic Dittus-Boelter model. Variations on this standard model are implemented by using properties and flow conditions calculated in specified ways. For example, the properties used in the Reynolds number could represent bulk calculated values for the two phases, the vapor saturated condition, or superheated vapor conditions. Below is the standard model for later reference: DkkCvDChnpm (1.47) In this model, the coefficient and exponents can be adjusted to fit the data. Common values are 0.023 for the coefficient and 0.8 and 0.4 for the exponents m and n. Unless stated otherwise, these are the values used in this research effort. 35

PAGE 36

The literature search has found a number of experiments that are peripherally related to the data in the NASA data. However, the data addressed in this dissertation are rare or even unique in several ways. First, the working fluid is hydrogen. As stated above, there are only three other published reports of experiments with hydrogen in a convective, IFB condition. None of these three experiments operated at the high mass flux levels of the NASA data. Finally, and most importantly, the extent of measured parameters makes these data extremely valuable. These measurements provide the means to theoretically analyze the pressure drop and heat transfer characteristics of hydrogen, and to validate any proposed model or correlation. 36

PAGE 37

Figure 1-1. Ratio of experimental to calculated Nusselt number for the 1961 data. 37

PAGE 38

CHAPTER 2 MODELLING APPROACHES FOR TWO-PHASE FLOW Angular Simplifications Two-phase fluid flowing in a pipe can have characteristics that vary in the axial, radial, and azimuthal directions. Axial dependencies of properties and flow structure can result from entrance effects, wall friction, turbulence, and heat addition. This dependency is typically not ignored, since it is changes in conditions in the axial direction that interest engineers typically. Radial dependencies can result from these same sources. Since it is a great simplification to ignore this dependency, this is commonly done. Corrections can be applied to models that explicitly ignore the radial dependency. For example, the effect of a radial temperature gradient on fluid properties can be accounted for by multiplying the Dittus-Boelter Nusselt number by a ratio of wall-to-centerline temperatures, usually raised to an exponent. Another example is the drift flux model, the purpose of which is to account for radial variations is fluid density and velocity. These two examples speak to the duel importance of neglecting radial dependencies in the formal conservation equations while simultaneously including radial effects through semi-empirical adjustments. Finally, azimuthal dependencies are usually important only in horizontal flow, where gravity strongly segregates the liquid and vapor phases due to the large difference in densities. In vertical flow with uniform heating, this dimension is typically confidently neglected. Basic Models There are four basic approaches that can be used to model the thermal hydraulics of two-phase flow. Each method explicitly defines the number of independent conservation equations used. The number of closure relations that link the corresponding conservation equations increases as the number of conservation equations increase, so that the number of conservation 38

PAGE 39

equations minus the number of closure relations will always equal three. While complexity increases as the number of conservation equations increase, the variety of information obtained about the flow also increases. This does not necessarily mean that predictions for pressure drop and heat transfer will be better for a six-equation model compared with a three-equation model. It simply means that more predicted information will be generated. The reliability of these predictions will depend directly on the validity of the closure relations and assumptions used to develop the overall modeling approach. The most sophisticated model is called the two-fluid model, in which there are separate mass, momentum, and energy equations for each of the phases. Closure relations must link the corresponding equations for each phase; mass, momentum, and energy transfer rate terms are defined at the phasic boundaries. The mass transfer term is relatively simple and is directly related to the change in quality. The momentum and energy transfer terms are more complicated at they depend on the momentum and energy associated with the newly vaporized fluid. They also depend upon the interfacial shear and heat transfer rates two terms for which data are difficult to obtain. These terms are usually developed in terms of theory and assumptions, or a combination of theory and experimental findings. In addition to the interfacial closure relations, there must also be relations for momentum and energy transfer at the fluid-wall boundary. These conditions are usually determined with more confidence because the experimental data that have been generated to understand these conditions are more complete. Research in single-phase flow, which has been extensively and reliably performed, often applies. For instance, the wall friction is a term that is of fundamental importance to engineers, and therefore has been studied since the beginning of the science of fluid mechanics. Heat transfer also is of fundamental importance. To simplify the analysis of 39

PAGE 40

data from an experiment, the wall-to-fluid heat transfer boundary is usually established as one of two conditions constant heat flux or constant wall temperature. With either, the wall heat transfer boundary condition is well defined. The next simpler model includes five equations. In this, the developer can choose which conservation equation to simplify, but usually selects either momentum or energy. In two-phase flows, it is commonly accepted that the pressures of both phases are the same. Therefore, the momentum equations for the two phases are usually reduced to one. This is accomplished by equating the interfacial momentum transfer terms, since they must be the same. That is, the momentum that one phase loses at the interfacial boundary is gained by the other. This approach has the great advantage of eliminating the interfacial shear stress term. Alternatively, the developer may choose to equate the energy transfer terms in a similar fashion. This eliminates the need to determine the rate of sensible heating of the liquid phase. A further simplification is made by reducing the number of independent conservation equations to four. In this case, there is sometimes a specific piece of information required, such as velocity slip. The simplest approach is the three-equation model, also called the homogeneous equilibrium model (HEM). In this, equations of mass, momentum, and energy conservation use properties that represent the mass-weighted values of the vapor and liquid phases. There is no information regarding the separate velocities of the phases. Equilibrium quality is used, which neglects liquid subcooling or superheating, and vapor superheating. In spite of its simplicity, the HEM is often cited as a standard against which the results of other models are compared. Flow Regime Analysis When the more complicated models are used, it is frequently necessary to determine the structure of the two phases relative to each other. The various structures in two-phase flow have 40

PAGE 41

been distilled down to a few flow regimes. A heated two-phase flow progresses through these flow regimes as it increases in quality. The specific set of flow regimes may be different for different conditions. For example, flow through a horizontal pipe can experience separated flow with the heavier species at the bottom of the pipe, and the lighter species at the top a flow structure not developed in vertical tubes. Flow through vertical tubes can also progress through a different set of flow regimes, depending upon the amount of applied heat. Low heat loads will result if preCritical Heat Flux (CHF) conditions. The vapor phase is generated at the wall and migrates to the center of the tube. Liquid is always on the surface of the tube wall until dryout occurs at high qualities. After this, the liquid is dispersed as droplets in a continuous vapor matrix. High heat loads can produce post-CHF conditions, or IFB, at very low qualities. In this situation, the wall is too hot for liquid to remain. Vapor stays along the wall of the tube throughout the increase of quality. The progression of flow regimes in IFB are IAFB, AIAFB, and DFB. These flow regimes are presented in figure 2-1. If the mass flux is low, then ISFB can occur after IAFB. Note that this figure, taken from Takenaka (1989), does not include the B for boiling in the regime nomenclature that this dissertation includes. IAFB is characterized by a relatively smooth interface between the vapor and liquid. The liquid flows through an annulus of vapor. The interfacial area is easy to determine assuming the void fraction is known. AIAFB is characterized by a rough interface. The liquid core is still whole, or in separate, parallel liquid filaments, but is rough such that determining its surface area is no longer a straight forward calculation using void fraction. The area for heat and momentum transfer likely increases relative to IAFB even though the amount of liquid is decreasing. Finally, in DFB, the liquid core completely breaks up into drops and is carried along in the continuous vapor matrix. This flow structure is very similar to pre-CHF dispersed flow. 41

PAGE 42

Because the physics of the flow is strongly dependent on the flow regime, it is common to base closure conditions and other modeling decisions on the local flow regime. Of course, this requires that the various transitions between regimes be predictable. As pointed out in chapter one, Ishii has put in significant effort to develop predictive models. His more recent work is with heated Freon 113 in relatively low velocity conditions. Observations are that the void fraction at the point of dryout has a significant impact on the flow regime transition correlation. The correlation is as follows (Babelli et al. 1994): 25.2854.01595JJfjDL (2.1) In this relation, L is the length at which the flow regime transitions from IAFB to DFB, D is diameter, f is the fluid viscosity, j J is the volumetric flux, is the surface tension, and J is the void fraction. Takenaka (1989, 1990) generated a flow regime map for IFB, as shown in Figure 2-2 where coordinates are equilibrium quality and total mass flux. Note that inlet velocity is used on the ordinate instead of mass flux, but his final map actually used mass flux. For his test conditions, this map predicted the IFB regimes he viewed. 42

PAGE 43

Figure 2-1. Various flow regimes for IFB (Takenaka, 1989). The ISFB regime on the left is Flow regime map generated by Take associated with low mass flow rates. Figure 2-2.naka for IFB (1989). Flow regimes are IAFB in region (a), AIAFB in region (b), DFB in region (c), and ISFB in region (d) 43

PAGE 44

CHAPTER 3 TEST DATA DESCRIPTION AND EVALUATION AND MODEL DEVELOPMENT Description of Experiments As referred to earlier, the data used to validate the model were generated at NASA Glenn Research Center (formerly Lewis Research Center) and published in two separate technical notes, NASA TN 765 and NASA TN 3095, in 1961 and 1966, respectively. These data will be referred to collectively as the NASA data to distinguish it from other hydrogen experiments, or as the 1961 and 1966 data when the data from the individual reports are discussed. The experiments were performed in support of rocket engine modeling for the US manned space program. Experimental Setup The experimental setup for the 1961 experiments is presented in figure 3-1. Hydrogen was stored in a large tank and pressurized by gaseous hydrogen to force it through the system. Piping from the tank to the test section and the test section were enclosed in a vacuum environment to eliminate convection heat transfer to the piping and working fluid. The vacuum container was a stainless steel cylinder 38.1 cm in diameter. Heat was generated inside the tube metal by applying a voltage across its length. The power supply for heat generation was external to the vacuumed environment. Therefore, the leads for the voltage supply, along with instrumentation leads, were passed through the wall of the vacuum chamber. The voltage was applied to the heated test section through copper flanges brazed to the tube. It was found that unevenly brazed joints distributed the power unequally circumferentially in the tube. Therefore, multiple connections to the buss bar were made and the brazed joint was X-ray inspected. After passing through the heated test section, the hydrogen was completely vaporized and then exhausted through the roof of the facility into the atmosphere. All system flow conditions were remotely 44

PAGE 45

controlled. The system pressure and flowy valves upstream and downstream of the test section. heating. This in turn is contained within a liquid nitrogen radiation shield to mitigate conversion of the test section were mixing chambers of high mperature were measured. Mixing the fluid in the mi 8 cm for r the used in regeneratively cooled rocket engine nozzles and other rocket engine piping. The rate were set b The setup of the 1966 experiments is similar to that of the 1961 setup. Figure 3-2 presents the configuration. More useful information is given in the 1966 report that will be repeated here. It is pointed out that the liquid hydrogen storage tank is enclosed in a vacuum to mitigate of parahydrogen to orthohydrogen. Finally, this is contained within a foam insulated container. The liquid hydrogen was forced through the flow system using gaseous normal hydrogen as a pressurant. Just upstream and downstream turbulence in which the fluid bulk pressure and te xing chambers and having an entrance length to the test section were found to be important since there could be some thermal stratification of the liquid as it is transferred from the storage tank to the test section, with warmer liquid adjacent to the wall and colder liquid in the center offlow. Five different tube diameters were used in the NASA experiments, ranging from 0.4to 1.29 cm inside diameter, and all were vertical with hydrogen flowing upwards. The heated test section length in the 1961 and 1966 experiments are 30.5 cm and 61.0 cm long, respectively.Straight, unheated approach lengths were included in all test sections; approximately 12.7 cmthe 1961 tests, and 30.5 cm for the 1966 tests. Approach sections and test sections were contained within the vacuum environment. Figure 3-3 and 3-4 present the test sections fo1961 and 1966 data, respectively. Experimental Conditions Heat fluxes and mass flow velocities are very high, and tube diameters are similar to those 45

PAGE 46

experimental conditions of these data reflect the nature of hydrogen flowing in a rocket engine. Table 3-1 presen ts a summary of test conditions. 6) tube and the copper flange. Erratic joints distributed power unequally into the tube and the ented for local static pressure, tube outside wall tempet accuracies. The 1966 report gives information on this ccuracies of instrumentation and measurements in the 1961 data are consi Heat was generated within the test sections by applying a voltage across the length of the section. Care was taken to ensure a uniform weld of the copper flange around the tube so that current would flow uniformly down the tube. As Hendricks (personal communication, 200stated the problem, The most damaging effect [on uniform heat generation] was the braze joint between the current paths in turn did not heat the tubes properly. Heat Leaks Paths for undesired heat transfer into or out of the system that have not already been addressed were either analyzed or otherwise considered by the authors of the 1961 data and determined to be insignificant. Instrumentation All test sections were instrum ratures, and local voltage drops. Accuracy was of paramount importance (Hendricks, personal communication, 2006). When initial results of tube wall temperatures ran counter to anything previously experienced or expected, double and triple instrumentation redundancy was implemented to determine the source of the error. Data published in the reports represent those deemed most accurate of the redundant measurements. Figure 3-5 illustrates some specifics of thermocouple and pressure tap installations. The 1961 report gives no information about instrumentation measuremen subject, and in general, the a stent (Hendricks, personal communication, 2006). 46

PAGE 47

All test sections had 12 thermocouples along the outer surface of the heated lengths, plus inlet and exit temperatures in the mixing chamber s. Thermocouples were either copper-constial ents were intended to determine the circumferential uniformity of power distrib nitrogquid nitrogen or ice. couple accuracy was determined by the recording system accuracy, standard calibrrature the in 1.1 K at the inlet and .6 K. No percent accuracy is given thermocouple measurements. Tube surface temperatures were checked by compdings tic mbers. me s, pressure values were interpolated at antan, which were silver soldered, or Chromel-Alumel, which were welded in place. Connections to the tube outer wall were made with great care to avoid affecting the test conditions or measurements. Leads from the thermocouples were 30 gage wire. Circumferentthermocouple placem ution in the tube and as checks for accuracy. The cold junction was atmospheric boilingen in the 1961 data, while the 1966 data used either li Thermo ation, lead wire and junction temperature gradients. The mixing chamber fluid tempemeasurements were estimated to have less than 1% probable error. Multiple thermometers inmixing chambers agreed to with for the tube surface aring multiple thermocouple readings attached by different techniques. The reausually agreed to within .6 K. The 1961 data had five static pressure taps spaced along the length of the test section andone at each of the inlet and exit mixing chambers. These pressure measurements were not differential relative to a datum. The other four tubes from the 1966 experiments had three stapressure taps spaced along the test section, and one at each of the inlet and exit mixing chaThese pressure measurements were differential relative to the pressure reading just upstream of the test section inlet. No pressure taps on any of the five test sections were located at the saaxial location as a wall thermocouple. To complete the pressure data set, smooth curves were hand-fitted through the measurements. From these curve 47

PAGE 48

the lors were ed to his ction. A ventu nd unts or taps were used. These incremental measurements of poweds d cations corresponding to the 12 thermocouple measurements. Commercial transducers with a maximum of 1% full-scale nonlinearity were used. Readings from these transduceconfined to half of the full scale. Therefore, errors from the pressure readings were estimatbe 2%. Unfortunately, the range of the transducers is not given, and efforts to discover tinformation have been unsuccessful. The differences in local static pressure measurements were found to agree with differential pressure measurements to within 20%. This was reported to correspond to an absolute static pressure measurement uncertainty of 1%. Mass flow rates were measured both upstream and downstream of the test se ri was placed upstream of the test section and a sharp-edged flow orifice was placed downstream of the heat exchanger. A second venturi, primarily used for flow control, was also used for mass flow measurements. Measurements from these were compared for accuracy, and all agreed to within 3%. Local values of voltage drops were measured by eight voltage taps along the length of theheated test section to assist in determining local power generation. Two sets of voltmeters aammeters that had independent sh r input were summed and compared with the overall power input measured by voltage and ammeter taps at the bottom and top of the test section. Agreement between these two methowas good (Hendricks, personal communication, 2006). Accuracies for these measurements are stated to be %. The values of the eight voltmeter measurements were not included in either publication. However, as will be explained later, these measured local voltage drops appear to have been useto determine local heat transfer coefficients, and in this sense, the local voltage drops are included. 48

PAGE 49

Data Validation The literature search has revealed five major experimental efforts investigating the heat transfer characteristics of convective internal pipe flow boiling hydrogen. Two of these are the 1961 and 1966 NASA reports that are the focus of this dissertation. The other three were alsperformed during the early stages of the U.S. manned space program. These studies were scrutinized for possible use to validate the NASA data set. Comparison with Similar Data o ata, nsfer y state conditions, isolating the effect of changing inlet pressure, mass flux, o l ts indicate that transition boiling occurs between wall superheats of 5 K and 20 K, thea ith imilar conditions from the NASA data set. The Core et al. data set includes calculated equilibrium qualities based on pressure and enthalpy. Negative equilibrium qualities were set to Core et al. (1959) performed experiments with hydrogen similar to those in the 1966 dbut with much fewer measuring points of pressure and temperature. Twenty-seven heat tratests with liquid hydrogen flowing through an electrically heated stainless steel test section, 6.35cm long and 0.213 cm inside diameter, were completed in the series. Each test comprised a number of different stead or heat flux. As a result, there are a total of 164 steady state conditions, with two points of heat transfer coefficient measurements each, in the set. Only the inlet pressure was measured, sa pressure loss analysis cannot be compared with data. The authors did not present a theoreticacorrelation for the heat transfer coefficient. Their primary goal was to evaluate the utility of hydrogen as a regenerative rocket nozzle coolant. This source stands out as the only one that presents wall superheats that are likely to represent transition boiling conditions. While most experimental resul data in this experiment show some superheats between these values. Therefore, these datmay represent results from transition boiling. Table 3-2 presents comparisons of heat transfer coefficients averaged from the two points of measurement on the test section, compared wruns with s 49

PAGE 50

zero. Therefore, inlet subcooling is not known. The two calculated heat transfer coefficients for each r ata %. xperimented with liquid and vapor hydrogen flowing in a 15.2 cm lo ot e a un in the Core et al. data are averaged and compared with the average heat transfer coefficient for runs with similar conditions over the same equilibrium quality range in the NASAdata set. Sets of compared runs are separated by bold lines in the table. The first runs listed in each comparison is from the Core et al. set, while the second listed run is from the NASA dset. The RMS difference between these comparisons is 46.2 Wright and Walters (1959) e ng and 0.635 cm inside diameter heated tube. Most of their 35 steady state liquid hydrogenexperiments were pre-CHF, with 11 runs showing wall-to-bulk temperature differences consistent with IFB. In fact, their data show a marked gap in wall-to-bulk temperature differences between 2.8 K and 22.2 K. Temperature differences between these values were nobtained. This gap is consistent with a transition in flow regime from pre-CHF and CHF conditions to IFB. They concluded that stable film boiling could occur for wall to bulk temperature differences as low as about 22 K. Test section pressure measurements were not obtained. There are three runs from their data set with conditions similar to several runs in the 1961 data. Table 3-3 presents the test conditions and average heat transfer coefficient over thtube length. Note that the average heat transfer coefficient listed for the 1961 data represent anaverage of points two through six. This omits the first point that is affected by inlet conditionsand concludes at approximately 15 cm into the test section. The heat transfer coefficients from the two different test series agree well. Lewis et al. (1962) experimented with boiling hydrogen and nitrogen flowing upward in type 304 stainless steel, electrically heated vertical tube 41.0 cm long and 1.41 cm inside diameter. Critical heat fluxes corresponding to transition to IFB were determined over a range of 50

PAGE 51

flow rates, heat fluxes, and qualities. They noted that the maximum CHF increased with increasing mass flux and decreased as the point of transition occurred farther into the tubeThese findings are consistent with the interpretation of runs 22, 26, 29, and 30 from the NASA data in figure 3-11 that will be discussed later. The mass flow rates in these experiments were slow that no measurable pressure drops were observed. Wall superheats were similar to those observed in the NASA data, with a maximum wall superheat of 5 o 00 K. Since mass fluxes and heat fe flow ese three show er, id. onduction were negligible. Therefore, a two dimen test section in which heat is generated by electrical current. luxes are an order of magnitude lower than in the NASA data set, there are no test conditions that are similar enough to warrant a comparison. Table 3-4 summarizes the test conditions of the three forced convection heated tubboiling hydrogen experiments discussed above and the NASA data. From the data in thexperiments and other hydrogen experiments in geometries other than internal tube flow, it can be said that transition boiling occurs between 5 K and 20 K. Review of tables 3-2 and 3-3that the data from the NASA experiments are reasonably consistent with results from othsimilar works. From this comparison, it is determined that the NASA data are, in general, valEnd Effects From the 1961 data, it is obvious that axial heat conduction occurs in the tube wall. Usingthe finite difference heat transfer theory presented by Incropera and DeWitt (2002), a Fortran program was generated to model the end axial heat conduction effects for the purpose of determining the data that are affected and should therefore be omitted from the analysis. It was assumed that curvature effects on axial c sional infinite plate with axial and radial heat conduction was used to approximate the tubegeometry. The middle of the length of the plate corresponds to the beginning of the heatedsection. Left of this position is the unheated approach section, while right of this point is the 51

PAGE 52

To ensure that the imposed boundary conditions did not affect the solution, lengths wall thicknesses were generated on either side of the midpoint, for a total length-to-thicknessratio of 100. It was found that the number of radial nodal points were not crucial to generating acceptable results, so a minimum number of five nodal points were selected in the y direction, with nodes one and five at the tube inner and outer walls, respectively. For the length-to-thickness ratio of 100, this required 401 nodal points in the x direction. Figure 3-6 presents the nodal structure and applied power distribution. Note that the distribution in the x directioclose to discriminate separate nodes, and the power generatio of 50 n is too n is typical. The applicable energy equation is 02 22kqyTxT (3.1) In this geometry, x is the axis parallel with the flow, and y is the radial direction. Also, q is the heat generation rate per unit volume. The variation in thermal conductivity as a function temperature will have only a very small impact on the results provided a representative 2of used to select the constant thermal conductivity. The thermal conductivity can therefion) 2.4. is temperature is ore be assumed constant in the analysis. The four boundary conditions applied to this problem are: 1. T(x -,y) = 25 K (a representative liquid hydrogen temperature in approach sect T/x (x +,y) = 0 (adiabatic boundary far into heated test section) 3. -kT/y = h(T w -T b ) at (x,y=0) (conduction = convection at wall/liquid interface) T/y = 0 at (x,y=Y) (adiabatic surface at tube outer wall) In the heated section, boundary condition three assumes that the axial heat transfer is much less than the radial heat conduction at the wall-liquid interface. To use this boundary condition, an estimate of heat transfer coefficient that supports the purpose of the particular scenario at handused. 52

PAGE 53

For each problem, the following four parameters must be specified; wall thickness, wall thermal conductivity, heat generation rate, and fluid-to-wall heat transfer coefficient. The heatransfer coefficients used in this analysis come from those values listed in the 1961 data set at thfirst point, which is 1.4 mm above the heated section inlet. The algorithm was iterated until themaximum difference in temperature in adjacent iterations was less than 1.0E-6 K. The computer model was validated through five observations. First, the boundary conditions at the left and right hand sides of the tube are satisfied, as is the boundary condition corresponding to the outside of the tube wall. Second, it is logical that the t e point of largest tempent that heat generation starts. Every scenario has satisfied this requirement. Third, the effect ofresults in a reasonable way. For example, increasing metal thermal conductivity causes the h, n and while the model calculated 207 K and 238 K. Run 1ith model predictions of 412 K on fferences re 38 K and 19 K, while the model results are 31 K and 19 K. These differences are deemed to rature slope should occur at the poi varying the parameters listed above affect the effect of heat conduction to be felt deeper into both sides of the point of heat generation. Fourtmagnitude of predicted inner and outer wall temperatures are reasonably close to those publishedin the 1966 report (1961 report did not publish outer wall temperatures). Two runs, seve11, were selected at random for comparison purposes. For run seven, the inner and outer wall temperatures are 231 K and 269 K, respectively 1 inner and outer wall temperatures are 461 K and 482 K, w and 431 K. Finally, the difference in tube inner and outer wall temperatures in the heated porti reasonably agree with published data. Again, using runs seven and 11, the published di a be well within the uncertainty in the four parameters and errors associated with the model assumptions for the intended purposes of this analysis. 53

PAGE 54

Figures 3-7 and 3-8 present inner and outer wall temperatures for the scenarios in which thermal conductivity and wall thickness are parameters. The two dimensional effects are noticeable in the right hand portion of the tube. To evaluate the effect of each parameter listed above on the tube end wall temperatures, high and low values of each parameter were run, with all other parameters set to no minal values. The le is axial inlet xt to ficantly higher heat transfer coefficient than will vapor hydrogen. Table 3-6 presents the model results and suggests that all test section ength from the heated section inlet to the point at which 95% of the final temperaturachieved was determined for each run and compared. Large differences in lengths by which 95% of the final temperature is achieved indicate a significant parametric effect on tube endheat transfer. Figure 3-9 presents the results of the computer model. Since the difference inouter and inner wall temperatures is small, only the outer wall temperatures are presented for each scenario for clarity. Table 3-5 shows the distances in thicknesses from the heat section at which 95% of the final temperatures are achieved. This analysis suggests that the effect of end axial heat conduction in the tube metal increases with increasing thickness and thermal conductivity, and decreasing heat transfer coefficient. It is approximately independent of heat flux. For a given test section, wall thickness and thermal conductivity are determined. The remaining variable that changes the end effect for a given test section is the heat transfer coefficient. To determine the maximum distance into the heated test section that experimental results might be affected, the worst-case heat transfer coefficient of 1000 W/m 2 -K was used for all test sections. This is half the lowest heat transfer coefficient in the entire data set, and should represent a worst-case scenario in the unheated section where liquid hydrogen is flowing nethe tube wall. That is, liquid hydrogen will have a signi 54

PAGE 55

data med an 1 cm from the ends. However, points 1 and 12 ints by se o-state an id. rsion to para is an exothermic process, with the emission of 703 kJ/kg of heat at 20 K, wh available to each form. This state of hydrogen is called normal hydrogen. The ratio changes to a ore than 0.8 cm from the heated test section boundaries are adequately unaffected to be used in the analysis. As a result of this analysis, all 12 points in the 1966 report will be ussince the end points in these runs are far more th the 1961 data are theoretically affected, and the data of wall temperatures strongly supporthis conclusion. Therefore, these 40 points will be excluded from the heat transfer and pressure drop analyses, leaving 572 points for consideration. All other data in the 1961 report are predicted to be adequately unaffected and will be used. Hydrogen States: Parahydrogen and Orthohydrogen Hydrogen is naturally found as a molecule composed of two atoms of hydrogen, joineda covalent bond. The proton at the nucleus of each atom has a spin associated with it giving rito four possible combinations of spin pairs between the two protons of a hydrogen molecule, H 2 Three of these combinations of nuclear spins are symmetric, resulting in orthohydrogen (ortho), while the fourth combination is antisymmetric, resulting in parahydrogen (para). This twnature or hydrogen is significant for several reasons. The heat of formation released during thetransition from ortho to para, coupled with the unstable nature of ortho at low temperatures, ccause significant boil-off of stored hydrogen if ortho constitutes a large fraction of the liquOrtho conve ich is significantly more than the latent heat of vaporization of 443 kJ/kg. Secondly, the thermal properties of specific heats and thermal conductivities of the two forms are known to be significantly different at cryogenic conditions, causing the need to consider the issue of theortho-para makeup of the test fluid throughout the test section. The relative equilibrium abundance of each form varies with temperature. At room temperature, the ratio is 3 parts ortho to 1 part para, reflecting the number of spin combinations 55

PAGE 56

larger proportion of para as the fluid is refrigerated. At 20.4 K, the ratio is 0.002 parts ortho to 0.998 parts para, at equilibrium. Note that time is needed to allow for equilibration, which canbe hastened in the presence of a catalyst. There are four processes in which one form of hydrogen can transition into the other; collisional, spontaneous, adsorption, and radiative. The collisional process can be further segregated to homogeneous and heterogeneous processes. Through the homogeneous colltransition, an ortho molecule acts as a paramagnetic medium isional through which spin exchange ule (Iverson, 2003). The heterooton, and is therefore also an exoth for an occurs either with another ortho molecule or a para molec geneous collisional transition requires a catalyst, such as a tank or pipe wall, that is propitious to the transition of one form to another. This method involves the interaction between the magnetic field generated by a magnetic material and the magnetic field associated with the nuclear spin of the H 2 nucleus. The interaction causes a reversal of spin in one of the nuclei, which effectively changes the form from one to the other. In both of these collisional processes, the transition from ortho to para is exothermic in the form of increased kinetic energy of the participating molecules. Natterer et al. (1997) describe a method of catalyzing the transition of ortho to para by flowing hydrogen through a tube that is charged with charcoal. Without a catalyst, the conversion from ortho to para liquid hydrogen has a time constant on the order of 180 hours (Scott, 1959). Milenko et al. (1997) measured natural ortho-para conversion rates within a wide region of hydrogen fluid states, including five different liquid temperature states. Their findings indicate a conversion time constant near 12 hours. The spontaneous transition of ortho to para produces a ph ermic process. Ehrlich (1991) sites theoretical results showing that the time constantisolated ortho molecule to transition is on the order of 10 11 years. 56

PAGE 57

Chemical adsorption of the hydrogen on the metal can lead to conversion of hydrogen. Ptushinski (2004) addressed the physics of this process. The adsorption process is composed ophysisorption and chemisorption, which d f enote different levels of interaction between the hydroeen In rogen atoms tho gen molecule and the metallic surface. These two levels are separated by a repulsive barrier of variable magnitude. As of yet, no theory for the time constant of transition betwthe para and ortho states for this process have been found. The fourth method considered here requires radiation bombardment of the hydrogen. this process, H 2 molecules dissociate due to the bombardment. The subsequent hydcan recombine with each other generating, on average, the equilibrium ratio of para and orforms associated with the system temperature (Kasai, 2003). Since the hydrogen storage tank used in the NASA tests was surrounded by a radiation shield, this process is not expected to contribute significantly to the production of ortho. Iverson (2003) presents a method to quantify the dynamic equilibrium density of para and ortho in a mixture of liquid hydrogen with collisions and irradiation present. He uses the following set of equations to quantify the concentration of ortho and para, considering homogeneous and catalyzed transitions: oopppooopoppo onCnCnKnnKdtdn2, (3.2) oopppooopopoppnCnCnKnnKdtdn2, (3.3) subject to the conservation equation, 2opH2 HpoNtntn (3.4) In the above equations, n, n, and N are the densities of ortho, para, and all H2 molecules, respectively. Kpo and Kop are conversion factors for homogeneous conversions from para to 57

PAGE 58

ortho ation o n the results. For the analyses in the NASA s gold plated and then used. This experiment is bastion atures wever, the opposite effect was observed, which was attributed to experimental etime of the hydrogen molecules in the test section was not long enough to generate significant ortho concentration from the para population aed 100% para makeup. 100% parahydrogen is assumed in the current analysis. Model Development Inverted annular film boiling of hydrogen is modeled in this analysis as a separated flow of us and from ortho to para, respectively. C po and C op are conversion constants for catalyzedconversions in a similar sense. Both the homogeneous and catalyzed conversion constants are strong functions of system temperature and pressure. Milenko et al. (1997) provides informabout the values of the constants. Hendricks et al. (1961) analytically quantified the various means of transition from para tortho and visa versa and chose to neglect the effects based o reports, 100% para was assumed. It is stated, though, that neglecting the presence of ortho may introduce error into some of the heat balance calculations. An accurate quantification of the ortho-para makeup was extremely important in the NASA analyses (Hendricks, personalcommunication, 2006). While the parahydrogen flowed through the heated test section, there was also concern about the transition from para to ortho as the fluid was heated. To test for this possibility, one test section wa ed on the fact that any heterogeneously catalyzed transitions from para to ortho that occur with a stainless steel test section should be eliminated by the gold plating. Since the transifrom para to ortho is endothermic, a stainless steel tube should show lower wall temperthan the gold-plated tube under the same test conditions. Ho rror. Their assessment was that the residence s it was heated and flowed in the tube to warrant adjusting the properties from the assum vapor and liquid. The liquid flows as a homogeneous core through an annulus of homogeneo 58

PAGE 59

vapor. In this geometry, the vapor interfaces with both the wall and the liquid core, while the liquid interfaces only with the inner boundary of the vapor annulus. All of the heat from the wais assumed to be absorbed by the vapor through convection. Radiation of energy to the vapor or directly to the liquid is assumed, a ll nd has been shown, to be negligible. Additionally, momentum loss te rded. This is enoug determined that the vapor superheat needed to be quantified. Without information regarding superheat, vapor velocity slip, or applicable information regarding void hrough friction at the wall is largely a function of vapor conditions. This approach is consistent with the experimental observations of Kawaji and Banerjee (1983, 1987). In their IFB quench front experiments with water flowing upward in a highly heated quartz tube, bubbles were seldom observed in the liquid core. They concluded that nearly all the vapor generated at the liquid-vapor interface flowed upward in the vapor film. They also found no evidence that thliquid column rewetted the tube wall. Local static pressures, tube wall temperatures, and voltage drops were reco h information for only a three equation model, also known as a homogeneous equation model (HEM), with mixture mass, momentum, and energy conservation equations. An extensiveliterature search has not uncovered data-based models for vapor superheat or vapor slip in the flow structure of this analysis. It is likely that these profiles will be unique relative to pre-CHFflows, so that information on vapor superheat and slip from pre-CHF will not apply. It was desired to obtain void fractions from the hydrogen data. To obtain useful void fraction data, it was determined that a no-slip condition was not acceptable, since the slip ratio directly affects the void fraction. In addition, a reasonable value for vapor velocity was desired to allow for a reasonable estimate of frictional losses. Also, since void fraction and slip are related to density, it was 59

PAGE 60

fraction profiles, theory and assumptions must be applied if more information is to be obtainedfrom these hydrogen data than what a HEM can provide. The desired information can be obtained with a one-dimensional, five-equation model, with separate vapor and liquid mass and energy flows, but with one momentum equation. This assumes that the local pressure is the same for both fluids, which is commonly accepted. Completing this model requires closure conditions for two of the following three quantities; vapor mass-specific energy flow, vapor slip, and liquid mass-specific energy flow. Since waltemperatures are part of the data set, it was determined that a closure condition for the vapor energy flow, through quantifying vapor superheat, could be reasonably determined. Neither the liquid heating nor the vapor slip is well understood. It was de l termined to model the liquid energajority of data s tion explanation. For example, run 30 has an extremely high mass flux of 3406 kg/m2-sec and a very low heat flux of 310 kW/m2. These operating conditions are most likely to delay the onset of y state. It was determined that modeling the interfacial momentum effects was not necessary for the objectives of this analysis. Including such effects would lead to a two fluid model. Nature of Data Consideration of figure 3-10 of tube inner wall temperatures minus liquid hydrogen temperatures leads to the expectation that the vast majority of data is IFB. The vast m how very large temperature differences between the inner wall and the liquid hydrogentemperature. These large temperature differences can only be sustained in an IFB flow structureThe four runs presented in figure 3-11 exhibit at least one point with relatively low temperature difference. It is likely that these points correspond to pre-CHF conditions, or possibly transiboiling. The trend of the temperature differences for these runs in figure 3-11 supports this 60

PAGE 61

CHF and the transition to IFB, and this is what is indicated by the data. It is not until approximately 40 cm into the heated section that the temp erature difference increases greatly. Run 2rting h r t at s, ere are other experimental findings that support this conclusion to omit them. Previous rogen indicates the magnitude of wall to bulk superheat that hydrogen will allowrted. Graham et al. (1965) presented test results from parahydrogen pool boiling that showom 9 has a lower mass flux of 2669 kg/m 2 -sec and approximately the same heat flux and would thus theoretically depart from nucleate boiling at a lower elevation than run 30. This is indeed what the data show, with run 30 temperature difference increasing significantly staafter the 16 cm point. Run 22 has a similar mass flux as run 30 at 3444 kg/m 2 -sec, but a muchigher heat flux of 1128 kW/m 2 One would expect this run also to transition to IFB at a lower elevation than run 30. While the temperature differences for run 22 at low elevations is highethan run 30s, it appears that the IFB structure is not stable until after the 24 cm point earlier than the run 30 transition. Since runs 22, 26, 29, and 30 show that pre-CHF conditions exisleast at some points, and the model generated to analyze these data assumes IFB conditionthese four runs will be excluded from the analysis. Th research with hyd before departing from nucleate boiling. Walters (1960) reported a maximum wall superheat from his single-tube forced hydrogen flow heat transfer experiments of about 2.8K. Sherley (1963) experimented with free-convection hydrogen heated by a small flat heating surface and reported wall superheats as high as 6.1K. Class et al. (1959) experimented with free-convection hydrogen on various surface conditions, heating surface orientations, and pressures. For a very thin layer of silicone grease applied to the test section, wall superheats of about 16.7K were repo ed wall superheats of up to 5.6K at a system pressure of 290 kPa before departure frnucleate boiling. Kozlov and Nozdrin (1992) measured heat fluxes and wall superheats at DNB 61

PAGE 62

during pool boiling of hydrogen for steel, aluminum alloy, and copper at low pressuresfound that wall superheats at DNB varied significantly between the three metals, as did the wallsuperheats during return to nucleate boiling from film boiling when they reduced the heat fluAt one atmosphere on steel, the wall superheat was on the order of 16 K. All of these studies support the previously stated assumption that the vast majority of data from TN 3095 represent post critical heat flux conditions. Carey (1992) states that the variables affecting critical heat flux are tube diameter, system pressure, and mass flux. The fourth controlling variable depends on whether the bulk flow is subcooled or saturated. For saturated flow, Carey sites the critical quality, while for subcooled flow it is the difference between saturation and bulk temperatures. Collier (1981) also lists length to diameter ratio as an important parameter. Chun et al. (2000) developed a new theoretica They x. l model for predicting CHF for low quality flows of water and refrigerants in round tubes. Chun states that there is general agreement that for highly subcooled flow, the liquid sublayer dryout approach performs well, while for low subcooling the bubble crowding model performs better. No one model works well in all conditions, though. Chun attempts to improve this situation by proposing that the controlling factor in CHF is the evaporation of the superheated liquid layer along the tube wall. Recent research into this issue has been performed by Celata et al. (1994, 1996, 1998, 2001) in Italy. While most of his research is focused on highly subcooled CHF of water, the general concepts will probably prove relevant to liquid hydrogen. While Carey (1992) lists three postulated mechanisms for CHF at low quality dryout under a growing bubble, vapor crowding, and dryout under a vapor slug Celata states that the liquid sublayer dryout theorypredicts the CHF under a wide range of subcooled conditions. 62

PAGE 63

Magnitude of Radiation Heating Heat is transported from the tube inner wall to the hydrogen primarily through convection. However, the large temperature differences experienced in the test series raises the concern that radiative heat transfer from the wall to the vapor and/or liquid hydrogen may be significant. While the exact analysis of radiation heating is complex, a simplified analysis of the worst-case scenario will reveal that radiative heating is at least three orders of magnitude less than conveg A nts an excerpt of his Ph.D. work, addressed this c ctive heating. Sparrow (1964) presented a thorough theoretical analysis of the effect of radiation heatinfrom a tube wall to a vapor/liquid flow in film boiling. His work generated a quantitative criterion by which the relative significance of surface-to-liquid radiation can be determined. more recent paper by Liao et al. (2005), which prese omplicated problem by modeling the liquid core flow as a long inner tube at the center of along outer tube. The equation for radiation heating he applied to this geometry is w fwfwrrTTq1144 (3.5) wfradThe emissivities, that will lead to the largest radiative heating are 1 for both hydrogen and wall. In this equation, r is radius, and is Stefan-Boltzmann constant. The radiative heat flux then reduces to 44 fwradTTq (3.6) The highest wall temperature from the data is 560 K, and the fluid temperature is roughlUsing these values to represent the upper limit of radiative heating, the magnitude is 5.6 kW/mThe lowest heat flux in the data set is 294 kW/m y 25 K. 2. of magnitude larger. Additionally, this lowest heat flux does not correspond to the highest wall temperature of 560 K 2 several orders 63

PAGE 64

used in this analysis, but instead has a much lower wall temperature of 178 K. In summary, there n. The g is appreciable, up to 7 K in some runs, and cannot be ignored in the energy balanThus, ch phase is used. Additionally, bulk thermodynamic properties are assumed. The conservation of mass equation is simply (3.7) The liquid momentum equation is is no run in this data set that has a radiative heating contribution of more than 2% of the total applied heat flux, and in fact is certainly much less than 2%. The impact of ignoring radiative heating of hydrogen is therefore justified. Conservation Equations Most of the experimental runs have subcooled liquid entering the heated test sectioamount of subcoolin ce. The velocities attained in some of the experiments required that the stagnation enthalpies of the two fluids be used in the energy balance instead of the static enthalpies. the momentum and energy equations are coupled and must be solved simultaneously. A one-dimensional model of this system was developed to calculate mass, momentum, andenergy balances. It is assumed that the pressure is constant across the flow cross-section, and while separate velocities of the two phases are determined, the bulk velocity for ea vlwww dzAgdzrdzdzPAddz dzlcll, uAudlcliilcl,,2 (3.8) where i and ri are the va por liquid interface shear stress and radial location, and A c is the flow area. The corresponding equation for the vapor phase is dzAgDdzdzrdzPAddzuAud2)( (3.9) dzdzvcgwiivcvvcvv,,, 64

PAGE 65

The velocity and area terms in these momentum equations can be replaced by use of the following relations: vGxu (3.10) v 11lxGu l (3.11) cvc AA ,clcAA (3.12) 1, In these equations, is the vapor void fraction. During the expansion of the derivatives, the vapor density was allowed to vary a (3.13) s a functieparate momentum equations are combined by equa on of z. Doing so facilitates investigating the effect of vapor superheating and its axial variation on the pressure profile. The liquid density axial variation was also allowed to vary. Also during the expansion, certain derivatives were replaced with equivalent expansions that used terms more amenable to the analysis. In a one-dimensional analysis such as this, these s ting the interfacial interactions of the two phases. The result is seen in equation (3.14): zTTxxvv22 xxxxzxGdPPvvlvl22222112112 dz TllTvvplPxPxGDzT111122222 (3.14) vlwllgTx14122 65

PAGE 66

This equation is similar to that commonly presented in two-phase flow textbooks, but witJacobian expansions h useful for this analysis. The following relation for the wall shear stress was used: 222lllwGf (3.15) As previously stated, the velocities attained in some experiments were high enough that they should be included in the enon the previous analy ergy balance. Radiation heating of the liquid is ignored based sis of liquid heating by radiation. As a result, conservation of energy is modeled as follows: 22112121lvxGGxwhere h is the enthalpy. In the application of this equation, the total energy flow rate of the flow is determined tothe total energy of the flow at the first point 1lvhxwhwxQ (3.16) be of measurements, point 1, plus the cumulative energ y added through heating: swAquhwQ 21 12 (3.17) As is the cumulative tube inner surface area up to a particular point of calculation. Entrance Lengths There are three types of entrance lengths considered here; hydrodynamic, thermal in the fluid, and thermal in the tube metal. Although all test sections included straight entrance approach sections approximately 12.5 cm and 30.5 cm long respectively, to develop the velocity and thermal profiles, this concern is obviated by the nearly instantaneous and violent change in flow structure from single-phase liquid to IFB. Stated in the 1961 and 1966 data, 66

PAGE 67

another way, the history of the flow up to the start of heating is not important. Instead of modeling liquid velocity and temperature profiles across the radius of the tube and their effects on hea t transfer and pressure drop, these processes are controlled by the conditions in the vapor, the inception of which occurs at the heated sconstantly increasing. t assumptions were employed in their theoretical analysis. Somewhat marginally applicable computations from Rohsenow et al. (1956) for condensation on a vertical plate were used to justify this transition Reynolds number. Regardless, this transition Reynolds monly quoted and used to determine transition from laminar to turbuuces tremely small thickness. This film thickness is achieved at a void fraction for the smallest tubes ifraction, of 0.008. From this, it is reasonable to assume that the vapor is always turbulent. ts violent test section entrance. As previously discussed, in the tube metal at the boundary between the heated test section lead to axial heat conduction, which in turn will affect the local heat flux and temperature. ection inlet, and in which the radial dimension is The developing hydrodynamic and thermal profiles in the vapor from the test section inleonwards must still be considered. Hsu and Westwater (1960) used law-of-the-wall theory to determine that the vapor in the annulus transitions from laminar to turbulent at a Re = 100. Some rather arbitrary number appears to be com lent flow of the vapor in IFB. Note that for typical values of vapor density and viscosity, and for typical velocities at the test section entrance, the vapor annulus dimension that proda Re of 100 is 0.001 cm an ex n the NASA data set, which will give the largest required void Additionally, it is hard to conceive of the vapor flowing in a laminar fashion after i generation at the heated and the entrance piping, there will be a significant axial gradient in metal temperature. This will Instead of the approximately constant heat flux established within the tube far from the 67

PAGE 68

boundaries of the heated test section, the local heat flux can be significantly reduced. Meawall temperatures from the 0.795 cm diameter tube support this conclusion. It is important to note that, while there is axial heat transfer in the metal, at any particular station near the inlet, all of the energy that is calculated to be transmitted to the flow up to that point will indeed be transmitted to the flow sured Thus, the calculated total energy input to the flow up to a given point will nhe y. If id ality and void to zero at the inlet. It was assumed that qy to the first measured point from the energy of the flow at the first point. Assuming the energy ot be in error. At the test section exit, this is not the case. Heat flows up and out of the test section at the exit. Thus, the flow will not receive all of the heat input until some point after theated section exit. Boundary Conditions The first point at which enough information is given to determine the thermodynamic stateof the flow is the first point listed in the tables of measurements for each run. For the 1961 and 1966 reports, this point is at 0.14 cm and 6.35 cm up from the test section inlet, respectivelthe flow at this point is subcooled, then the published quality is zero, and the published temperature and pressure is used to determine the thermodynamic state. If a positive quality is listed, then the published pressure and quality is used. Quality and void fraction are determined from the momentum and energy balances. Thebalances calculate changes in static pressure and total energy. Therefore, the quality and vofraction of the first point in each run must be determined in a method other than using these balances. It was determined to initialize the qu uality and void increased monotonically at each successive point. Implementing this boundary condition required knowledge of the thermodynamic state of the fluid at the test section inlet. This information is not given directly. However, the energstate of the fluid at the inlet can be found by subtracting the energy added from the inlet 68

PAGE 69

associated with the local velocity to be negligible relative to the enthalpy of the flow, this energy level per unit mass is used as the bulk enthalpy of the flow. The pressure at the inlet is determined using the same technique the authors used to determine the pressure profile fit a smooth curve through the measured points. The cubic least squares fit of the pressure profipreviously described, were use to extrapolate backwards to calculate the test section inlet pressure. Thus, pressure and bulk enthalpy are determined for the inlet. From this, the thermodynamic and kinetic state of the liquid and vapor is determined. The inlet was then defined to be point o les, as ne for each run, and the number of points used in the analysis of each run ilar graph on page 295. Hammoudas graphs quality is less than one due toe increased from 12 to 13. The momentum equation requires positive qualities. However, as stated previously, many runs had subcooled inlet conditions, and in fact remained subcooled from an equilibrium sense for a number of points. Therefore, a method to establish a positive quality was necessary. The literature search produced no model for true quality. Hammouda (1996) presented a notional graph of the variation of true mass quality as a function of length in IFB. Collier (1994) presents a sim is not based on measurements, but instead from his interpretation of conditions based on his observations of IFB. The slope of mass quality in IFB is positive at negative equilibrium qualities. Near where equilibrium quality equals zero, the slope of mass quality with length increases. At some low value of quality, mass and equilibrium qualities are equal, after which equilibrium quality is greater. At an equilibrium quality of one, the mas vapor superheating. This model encompasses the following three concepts in IFB: the subcooled liquid experiences some sensible heating; vapor is present and accumulates while th 69

PAGE 70

bulk flow is subcooled; due to vapor superheating, the flow will not be entirely vaporized when the equilibrium quality equals one. Closure Conditions To complete the set of equations, the level of bulk vapor superheat, the amount of liquid sensible heating, and the nature of the wall friction must be determined. Vapor superheat To quantify vapor superheat, several concepts were tried, including theory presented bBurmeister (1993). He presents a theoretical derivation for the mixing cup temperature. Following are the applica y ble energy equation and boundary conditions used: rrzsubject to rqTuCrp1 (3.18) k q r zrrT),( (3.19) w0 0 ,0 r zrTFollowing are the assumptions used in his development. 1. constant wall heat flux 2. circular duct 3. flow velocity and temperature profiles are fully developed 4. u/U 1 5. Pr is constant and 1 6. Pr = 1.0 7. Law of the wall applies, with sublayer, buffer, and core zones 8. u/U = (y/r) (3.20) avgtCL0 1/7 and radial temperature profile has the same form The results of his analysis give a mixing cup temperature of the following form: wwCLmTTTT65 (3.21) 70

PAGE 71

The centerline temperature in this equation is the liquid temperature. It seemed logical that the temp erature profile in the vapor could be modeled as a turbulent mptions listed above are well satisfied by these NASA data, and argum data set. Various ere tried between the theoretical 5/6th and the commonly-used Energy balan aka hich they measured vapor superheats iof the vapor. Interestingly, their data strongly support the use in this effort of for the vapor superheat coefficient. Liquid energy flow To complete the theory for a five-equation model, an assumption must be made regarding the energy state of the liquid. Theory regarding heat transfer to the liquid flow can be found in six-eq et al. (1993), in their two-fluid g with liquid nitrogen, used theory for water droplet heating in ber is modeled as (3.22) randtl number is evaluated at film conditions. This model was used in a flow geometry identical to that used in flow. Most of the assu ents can be made for the remaining assumptions. Use of this model with the 5/6 th coefficient caused numerous energy balance errors, primarily in the 1961 coefficient values w ce errors were minimized with the smallest coefficient of Therefore, it was determinedto proceed with this value. This coefficient value is consistent with the analyses of Taken(1989) in his IFB studies. Nijhawan et al. (1980) performed experiments in w n post-CHF flowing water. They observed significant superheating uation models, also called two-fluid models. Hedayatpour model of a vertical line coolin superheated steam from Lee and Ryley (1968). The Nusselt num 5.0PrRe74.02Nu 33.0 where the Reynolds number is evaluated at droplet conditions, and th e P this dissertation liquid core flowing homogeneously inside an annulus of vapor. 71

PAGE 72

Hammouda (1997) observed that the heat transfer coefficients fo r the wall-to-vapor and the vaporor-to-to-liquid can both be modeled as functions of Reynolds number to a power and Prandtl number to a different power. With some assumptions, he concluded that the ratio of vapinterface and wall-to-vapor heat fluxes were controlled as follows: vwsatvvwivTTTTqq (3.23) He gave no experimental justification for this model except that he noted predictions from his two-fluid model provide better prediction accuracy than other IAFB prediction methods he assessed. The assumption used in this dissertation is that the liquid experiences no sensible heating. It remains at its inlet temperature throughout the heated tube unless the local pressure drops to the saturation pressure for the liquid temperature. From this point onward, the liquid temperature n temperature at the local pressure. to es not absorb 100% of and evenly disture profile as it flows through the core of the tube can be solved. The liquid core is modeled as an infinitely long rod of constant radius R having a uniform initial temperature Tl and instantaneously assumes the saturatio Rationale for this assumption comes from the fact that vapor is definitely present during IFB, even for subcooled flows. Therefore, the liquid certainly does not absorb and evenly distribute 100% of the energy from the tube wall. That is, the fluid does not increase in temperature to saturation before it starts to generate vapor. This observation easily extends inthe saturated condition in which it is logical to assume that a saturated liquid also do tribute the energy input from the wall. The true nature of the liquid heating almost certainly lies between the extremes of no sensible heating and thermodynamic equilibrium. Using some assumptions, the exact theoretical time-dependent liquid tempera 72

PAGE 73

subjee or lower remains to conduct heat from the liqat a uniform temperature across its radius at the time heat is applied (the test section inlet), that at mathematical model that captures the physics of this problem is cted to a uniform temperature bath at temperature T sat It is assumed that the bath temperature is the saturation temperature of the fluid at the local pressure. That is, any liquid that rises above the saturation temperature evaporates and leaves the liquid core and does not heat the remaining liquid. Only liquid that is at the saturation temperatur uid/vapor interface inwards. This model also assumes that the liquid is liquid radial velocity gradients are unimportant to heat transfer, and properties are constant. This, heat transfer in the liquid can be modeled by conduction alone. The rTrrCktT1subject to the following boundary conditions: sTtRT, r (3.24) (3.25) 0 ),0(ttT (3.26) and the initial condition: lTrT0, (3.27) The time-dependent solution of this problem is (Arpaci, 1966) 2,slsTTTtrT (3.28) roots of the Bessel function of the first kind of order zero. The solutir 1102nnnnCktRJRrJenwhere n R are the characteristic on of interest from this model is the average temperature rise for a typical differential liquid volume that passes through the heated test section. Following are the values that will be used foeach term: 73

PAGE 74

R = 2E-3 m = 60 kg / m k = 0.1 W / m-K C = 2E4 J / kg-K Wall The frictional losses artwo-phase friction multiplier developed by Rogers (1968) at Los Alamos National Lab. His model was developed for friction modeled as only the liquid component of the two-phase flow flowing alone. Thus, the friction factor is ped specifically for two-phase internal flow hydrogen. Although his model is largely th 3 T s = 28 K T l = 25 K These values correspond to a liquid subcooling of 3 K, which is a typical value. Also, a typical differential fluid volume residence time in the test section of 1/30 th of a second will be used. Figure 3-13 presents the results that strongly support the assumption to ignore sensible heating of the liquid. This is the assumption that will be applied in the model. friction e modeled with a Blasius-type relation for the friction factor and a 25.0 (3.29) Re079.0lf Rogers model was develo eoretical with some data validation, it is applicable to the entire two-phase hydrogen pressure range, and is presented in closed form as follows: E fPPPxxx38187.08.12759.1203966.0759.121324.011 (3.30) where pressure is in atmospheres, and E is (3.31) 32695.1646.2896.1xxxE 74

PAGE 75

Ml Implement odeation entation of this theory, two observations directed the final form of the orienting the theory requires an iterative scheme with discretized quality d vs. Each combination of quality and void fraction will result in errors in a tion. This is due mostly to s of the model, and probably to a lesser extent due to inaccuracies in experimental measuf ution were implemented that relied on reducing the error in energy and moin the problem and due to the fact that, in some cases, the solution of least error is greater than Performing a dumb progression of quality/void fraction pairs, while not conservative of CPU time, was found adequate. Figure 3-14 presents the flow chart of the auid are known since liquid temperature, vapor temperature (through the superheat equation), and local pressure are known. The error limits place on calculated momentum and energy changes are 2% of measurement. All quality-void fraction pairs that agreed with the measured pressure loss to within 2% were saved for processing in the energy balance. This preliminary solution set was During the imp lem algthm. First, implem a noid fraction predicted pressure drop and energy flow relative to measurement. Acceptable levels of error must be defined, which results in a quality-void fraction pair domain of solutions from which final pair must be selected. Second, it was found that there are some points for which this model will not simultaneously satisfy both momentum and energy conserva the inaccuracie rements. For most points, momentum and energy conservation are satisfied with negligible errors associated with the necessity of discretization. It is for these two reasons that smart iteration techniques failed. Several other methods ofinding the correct quality-void fraction sol mentum by determining the correct direction to change each value. However, these iteration methods were found to be inadequate due to the nature of the equations the error limits for most other points. lgorithm. Note that the thermodynamic state of the vapor and liq 75

PAGE 76

then input to the energy b alance. The solution domain is constrained by noting the contribution of vel y etized roblems se monotonically up the tube. It was fly high y increase the accepted momentum and energy errors until ocity to the total energy flow. It is significantly less than that of enthalpy even for the highvelocity flows. Therefore, the energy balance is a very weak function of void fraction and a verstrong function of quality. Thus, the quality range is always reduced to one or a few discrvalues, but with a range of void fractions that satisfy the momentum equation within the error limits. It is logical to use the liquid and vapor velocities to discriminate between the remaining solutions. Various methods were tried. One method required the vapor velocity to be greater than the liquid velocity at all points, but this did not work best for runs near the critical pressure. A slip of less than one appears to satisfy these runs best. Another constraint that led to pfor high pressure runs was to require the vapor velocity to increa inally determined to select the minimum vapor velocity from the set of solutions that satisfied the energy balance within the specified error limit. This constraint eliminated extremehigh vapor velocities, some well over the sonic velocity, while giving reasonable results forpressure runs. To address points for which momentum and energy conservation can not simultaneously be satisfied, it was determined to equall a solution was obtained for both. Note that increasing the acceptable range of errors on momentum consistently decreases the calculated errors in energy balance, so this method identified the lowest level of error for both quantities while giving preference to neither. 76

PAGE 77

Table 3-1. Table of experimental conditions for the NASA data set. kg/m2-skPakW/m2kPaKcmcm11.1146327759119327-0.11.2880.025Inconel X22.115264396994822-3.11.2880.025Inconel X33.114332974373515-0.11.2880.025Inconel X55.115662104575212-3.81.2880.025Inconel X66.114263073371920-1.31.2880.025Inconel X71.12468731075132445-4.11.1130.081Inconel82.12475361103130876-2.71.1130.081Inconel104.1251111.542 setrunGPinq"dpSubcool TD, innerWall thicknessMaterial 44.1151488102376813-2.61.2880.025Inconel X93.1248895889124241-3.31.1130.081Inconel53186881720-2.41.1130.081Inconel12376161357211-2.90.8510.051304 Stainless steel122.5411119861132486-4.80.8510.051304 Stainless steel133.5144.53890698242512-7.20.8510.051304 Stainless steel177.5411787592093250-2.60.8510.051304 Stainless steel199.20411218121635148-0.20.8510.051304 Stainless steel221.568344412651128274-6.60.4780.079Inconel276.562383823654201-4.30.4780.079Inconel321.1802161731037611700.7950.079Inconel2793766800.7950.079Inconel2283765100.7950.079Inconel354.1365.1376.180711233116378700.7950.079Inconel4210.272125799710100.7950.079Inconel4716.201712286137312600.7950.079Inconel4817.2212974901520149-20.7950.079Inconel4918.229224081520153-0.80.7950.079Inconel5019.22621335152013200.7950.079Inconel5120.20115164981651165-3.20.7950.079Inconel 3989298470332-6.60.8510.051304 Stainless steel155.2155312511766102-3.80.8510.051304 Stainless steel166.201128611121733113-2.70.8510.051304 Stainless steel188.20311291221173393-3.30.8510.051304 Stainless steel2010.5359456851798201-10.8510.051304 Stainless steel2111.5369327462076223-0.90.8510.051304 Stainless steel232.577196511411112232-4.90.4780.079Inconel243.559246610591112272-6.20.4780.079Inconel254.55824461072981272-6.20.4780.079Inconel265.5623186856670160-6.20.4780.079Inconel287.5612735817670146-5.30.4780.079Inconel298.5642669594294104-3.80.4780.079Inconel309.5653406613310124-4.60.4780.079Inconel3110.5632165561294109-2.70.4780.079Inconel332.18031242343.1804849 8055751883763800.7950.079Inconel806165335962179-0.80.7950.079Inconel387.18088042596377100.7950.079Inconel398.20011553399981107-2.40.7950.079Inconel409.20021242359981103-1.60.7950.079Inconel4110.2858303997114-0.20.7950.079Inconel4312.2213794481144132-1.30.7950.079Inconel4413.20116264571357136-3.20.7950.079Inconel4514.20112063991373141-2.10.7950.079Inconel4615.2018493391373146-0.70.7950.079Inconel 77

PAGE 78

Table 3-2. Comparison of Core et al. (1959) heat transfer coefficient s with Hendricks et al. (1961, 1966) G q''Pinaverage hdifference S ourcerun kg / ( m se c) kW / m kPa kW / ( m K) % C ore e t a l .1.352 0 47 4 2213.49 H en d r i c k s e t a l 35 575 376 18 8 3 10 12 C ore e t a l .4.456234 3 4002.87 H en d r i c k s e t a l 35 575 376 18 8 3 05 6 C ore e t a l .5.349 4 32 7 4412.07 H en d r i c k s e t a l 35 575 376 18 8 3 10 33 C ore e t a l .8.352 0 3116622.33 H en d r i c k s e t a l 35 575 376 18 8 3 10 25 C ore e t a l .1.649 4 155 3 2625.17 H en d r i c k s e t a l 50 621 1520 33 5 4 15 25 C ore e t a l .5.766 6 171 7 3865.51 H en d r i c k s e t a l 50 621 1520 33 5 3 95 40 C ore e t a l .4.855 9 94 8 4273.68 H en d r i c k s e t a l 42 721 997 25 7 3 80 3 C ore e t a l .4.955 6 106 3 4343.94 H en d r i c k s e t a l 42 721 997 25 7 3 80 4 C ore e t a l .6.399 5 60 5 5035.18 H en d r i c k s e t a l 37 1123 637 31 1 3 70 40 C ore e t a l .6.4991103 0 5104.80 H en d r i c k s e t a l 41 858 997 30 3 3 85 25 C ore e t a l .10.2102 5 9326416.46 H en d r i c k s e t a l 41 858 997 30 3 3 70 75 C ore e t a l .8.452 0 89 9 6764.47 H en d r i c k s e t a l 2 643 948 96 9 2 70 66 C ore e t a l .9.352 7 109 5 65 5 3.77 H en d r i c k s e t a l 4 488 768 1023 2 70 40 C ore e t a l .9.452 7 117 7 6623.2 5 H en d r i c k s e t a l 4 488 768 1023 2 50 30 C ore e t a l .19.344 3 70 3 10412.60 H en d r i c k s e t a l 4 488 768 1023 3 10 16 C ore e t a l .21.449167 0 108 9 4.76 H en d r i c k s e t a l 4 488 768 1023 3 00 59 C ore e t a l .10.31012186 4 6625.60 H en d r i c k s e t a l 20 945 1798 68 5 3 85 45 C ore e t a l .11.291 9 163 5 6905.28 H en d r i c k s e t a l 20 945 1798 68 5 4 00 32 C ore e t a l .12.495 4 68 7 65 5 5.51 H en d r i c k s e t a l 13 892 703 98 4 2 90 90 C ore e t a l .14.474 9 67 0 8623.26 H en d r i c k s e t a l 13 892 703 98 4 2 90 12 C ore e t a l .16.496 7 58 9 101 4 5.46 H en d r i c k s e t a l 13 892 703 98 4 2 90 88 C ore e t a l .12. 5 95 4 121 0 6625.09 H en d r i c k s e t a l 7 873 1324 1075 4 15 23 C ore e t a l .20.187 4 1651102 7 4.59 H en d r i c k s e t a l 7 873 1324 1075 4 60 0 C ore e t a l .12. 5 95 4 121 0 6625.09 H en d r i c k s e t a l 9 895 1242 88 9 3 30 54 C ore e t a l .12.695 4 153 7 6765.28 H en d r i c k s e t a l 49 922 1520 33 5 4 55 16 C ore e t a l .13.332288 3 7033.37 H en d r i c k s e t a l 3 329 735 74 3 2 10 61 C ore e t a l .15.437 7 83 4 9523.8 5 H en d r i c k s e t a l 3 329 735 74 3 2 15 79 C ore e t a l .13.445 6 103 0 6963.80 H en d r i c k s e t a l 1 327 1193 75 9 2 50 52 C ore e t a l .13. 5 351130 8 7034.50 H en d r i c k s e t a l 1 327 1193 75 9 2 45 84 C ore e t a l .14.474 9 67 0 8623.26 H en d r i c k s e t a l 6 630 719 73 3 2 50 30 C ore e t a l .19.444 6 119 4 102 0 3.39 H en d r i c k s e t a l 8 536 1308 1103 4 15 18 78

PAGE 79

Table 3-3. Comparison of average heat transfer coefficients for similar runs in the Wright anWalters (1959 d ) data set and TN 765. Gq''Pinaverage hdifferenceSourcerunkg/(m2-sec)kW/m2kPakW/(m2-K)%Wright & Walters (1959)159082602503.83Hendricks et al. (1961)348493762283.0824.3Wright & Walters (1959)235223851673.11Hendricks et al. (1961)355753761883.003.7Wright & Walters (1959)354273901792.47Hendricks et al. (1961)355753761883.00-17.7 Table 3-4. Summary of test conditions for major forced convection internal tube flow boiling hydrogen experiments SourceminmaxminmaxminmaxCore et al. (1959)32210271698121931469Lewis et al. (1962)42311126207510Wright & Walters (1959)410117210390138276Hendricks et al. (1961)57516533761651188498Hendricks et al. (1966)327344429420935941265System pressure, [kPa]Heat flux, [kW/m2]Mass flux, [kg/m2-sec] Table 3-5. Result of parametric sensitivity study of end axial heat conduction. 9 thermal cond.heat xfer coeff.wall thicknessheat flux95% lengthset #W/m-KkW/m2-K1E-4mMW/m2thicknesses515251104525115151515112.820154516251522113.8301528173515250.38.340152528.5parameter Table 3-6. Distance into tube wall from start of heating at which tube metal temperatures are reduced by at least 5% from the nominal level. RunsInner DiameterThicknessD/T ratioMaterialThermal Cond.Heat FluxHeat xfer Coeff.95% distance[cm][cm][W/m2-K][MW/m2][kW/m-K][cm]1-61.2880.02551.5Inconel X13110.417-101.1130.08113.7Inconel1 3 110.7311-210.8510.05116.7304 SS20110.7122-310.4780.0796.1Inconel1 3 110.6932-510.79 5 0.07910.1Inconel1 3 110.71 79

PAGE 80

Figure 3-1. NASA TN 765 experimental setup. 80

PAGE 81

Figure 3-2. NASA TN-3095 experimental setup. 81

PAGE 82

Figure 3-3. NASA TN-765 data test section. 82

PAGE 83

Figure 3-4. NASA TN-3095 test section 83

PAGE 84

F igure 3-5. TN 3095 instrumentation. 84

PAGE 85

Figure 3-6. Nodal distribution and heat generation distribution used to model end effects at tube inlet. Figure 3-7. Radial metal temperature profiles as a function of metal thermal conductivity. 85

PAGE 86

Figure 3-8. Radial metal temperature profiles as a function of metal thickness. Figure 3-9. Effect of specified parameters on tube end wall axial heat transfer. 86

PAGE 87

Figure 3-10. Difference in wall to liquid temperature for all data considered. Figure 3-11. Wall to liquid hydrogen temperature differences for four runs that show at least one very low difference. These small differences are associated with pre-CHF conditions. 87

PAGE 88

Theoretical Radial Liquid Core Temperature Profile at Heated Test Section Exit, Based on Typical Experimental Values2526272800.050.10.150.2Radial Position, cmLocal Radial Liquid Temperature, K Core radius = 0.2 cmk = 0.1 W / m-K = 60 kg / m3C = 2E4 J / kg-KTsat = 28 KTl = 25 KLiquid residence time = 0.0333 seconds Figure 3-12. Theoretical liquid core temperature profile at the exit of the heate d test section, to support the assumption to ignore sensible heating of the liquid. 88

PAGE 89

Initialize x Initialize Calculate p p within eps of measurement Save (x,) pair Next Next x YesNo Send saved (x,) pairs to energy analysis NoNo Initialize x Initialize Calculate E E within eps of measurement Next Next x Yes Vapor velocity < Vmin Save (x,) pair,Vmin = vapor velocity Yes End Initialize x Initialize Calculate p p within eps of measurement Save (x,) pair Next Next x YesNo Initialize x Initialize x Initialize Initialize Calculate p Calculate p p within eps of measurement p within eps of measurement Save (x,) pair Save (x,) pair Next Next Next x Next x YesNo Send saved (x,) pairs to energy analysis Send saved (x,) pairs to energy analysis Send saved (x,) pairs to energy analysis NoNo Initialize x Initialize Calculate E E within eps of measurement Next Next x Yes Vapor velocity < Vmin Save (x,) pair,Vmin = vapor velocity Yes End NoNo Initialize x Initialize Calculate E E within eps of measurement Next Next x Yes Vapor velocity < Vmin Save (x,) pair,Vmin = vapor velocity Yes End Initialize x Initialize x Initialize Initialize Calculate E Calculate E E within eps of measurement E within eps of measurement Next Next Next x Next x Yes Vapor velocity < Vmin Vapor velocity < Vmin Save (x,) pair,Vmin = vapor velocity Save (x,) pair,Vmin = vapor velocity Yes End End Figure 3-13. Flow diagram for momentum and energy analysis of data. 89

PAGE 90

CHAPTER 4 ANALYSIS AND VALIDATION OF MOMENTUM MODEL RESULTS Data Referencing The NASA data set comprises 51 steady state runs in which there are 13 data points each. The first point is at the heated test section inlet. For runs 1 31, the 13th point is 6.3 cm before the heated test section exit. For runs 32 51, the 13th point is at the heated test section exit. The runs fall naturally into five groups based on inner diameter. Table 4-1 lists the tube dimensions, the run numbers associated with each tube, and a reference number that will be used for convenience in later analyses. Data Refinement It was determined through various means that the data set needed to be refined. Following is a description of the approach to this process. Omitted Data The points that are affected by inlet and end conditions, and any calculations that include these affected points, should be excluded from analyses. For runs 1-31, point 1 at the test section oint 13 at 55 cm will be considered. For runs 32-51, points 1, 2, and 13 at the inlet, 0.1 cm, and at the test section exit will be excluded. Only results between point 3 at 1.6 cm and point 12 at 29 cm will be considered. Problematic Data Validity of some data is questioned. The basis for questioning these points lies in apparent discontinuities between adjacent values. Figure 4-1 presents several examples. Run 42 point 8 at 19 cm shows a rise in wall temperature of 40 50 K relative to adjacent wall temperatures. This magnitude of temperature rise and fall over a 7 cm length, and the fact that the event is inlet falls into this category. Only results between point 2 at 6 cm and p 90

PAGE 91

exceptional in these data, begs an explana effect is evident in run 32 at 27 cm. It may be that a unique flow structure occurs for a short length in these runs. The computer model is robust enopoint, the model cannot satisfy the energy balance. This is because of the assumption that all of then the increase in mean vapor enthalpy may require a larger energy addition th the previo the model. This is why these points of high temperature are consistently associated with negative energy addition errors the ms s. The all temperature point that was deemed obviously out-of-family was run 42, at the 19 oint also was replaced by a linear interpolation between adjacent points. Whil tion. A similar ugh to accommodate many, but not all, of these changes and solve for the momentum and energy balances within the specified limits. For some points in which the wall temperature increases drastically from the previous the vapor at a point is at the calculated vapor temperature, which is a function of the wall temperature. If there is a large increase in wall temperature, an the energy added through heating from us point, even with zero change in quality. To satisfy these points, the quality would have to be reduced, which is assumed to not be possible in increase in wall easured added energy can not attain the increase is vapor energy. Tube three exhibits a consistent decrease in wall temperature at the 34 cm location. Figure 4-2 presents the wall temperatures for all 11 runs on tube three. This is interpreted as a bias in the measurement. Therefore, in making calculations using the wall temperature, these erroneouexperimental values have been replaced by a linear interpolation between adjacent pointonly other w cm elevation. This p e other points in the data set showed erratic trending, it was usually uncertain which points should be modified. A common characteristic is for adjacent points to trend oppositely, e.g., onelow and the next high. Which point was biased was usually not determined. Therefore, no modifications were made. 91

PAGE 92

Also evident in figure 4-1 are the end effects in which heat is conducted axially within the tube metal at the inlet and exit of the test section, as discussed in chapter 3. The steep gradient inwall temperatures for most runs between points 2 and 3 at 0.14 cm and 1.5 cm at the inlpoints 12 and 13 at 29 cm and 30.5 cm prove the end effect. et and What is of particular interest are the severcan be ill al runs, 32 and 36 in figure 4-1, in which the inlet and exit temperatures are actually higher than their adjacent measured temperatures inward from the ends. This indicates that there is an end effect other than axial heat conduction influencing measured wall temperatures. This explained by considering that the collars brazed onto the test section ends to apply a voltage wnot distribute the current absolutely evenly across the tube metal radius. The current flow will distribute itself across the thickness of the metal over a finite distance, and will be concentrated near the brazed collar at the ends. Therefore, the current density will be higher at the tube outer wall where the collar is brazed and will therefore generate more heat towards the outer part of the wall, where the thermocouple is attached. The inlet and exit wall temperatures are lower than their adjacent wall temperatures for the runs that have high wall temperatures, as runs 40, 42, 47, and 50 indicate, in spite of the concentration of current near these end thermocouples. Comparing these trends with the rising wall temperatures at the ends observed in runs 32 and 36 exemplify the relative impact of the independent effects of axial heat conduction and current concentration. For runs with low wall temperatures, the temperature rise due to current concentration is greater than the temperature decrease due to axial heat conduction, with the net effect that the measured wall temperature rises. The opposite net effect is evident in the high wall temperature runs. That is, axial heat conduction has a greater effect on measured temperature than does current concentration. 92

PAGE 93

Data y, ifference in the calculated energy addition betwe e drop. The pressure drop between the inlet and the 6.35 cm elevation in run eight does not allow for a high void fraction solution given the energy addition and vapor temperature, leaving only the Representation The pressure data exhibited uneven trending, to varying degrees, in all runs. This unevenness can present problems for a modeling algorithm using the pressure data to solve for other flow conditions. Therefore, a smooth regression line was generated for each run to represent the axial pressure profile. It was found that a third order least squares fit modeled all runs very well, with correlation coefficients very near unity for most runs. Table (4-2) presents these correlation coefficients, standard deviations, and normalized (to pressure drop across length of tube) standard deviation. In discussing the model results, momentum and energy balances are discussed in terms of normalized values for each point. For example, the fractional pressure drop error between twopoints refers to the difference in the calculated pressure drop between the previous point and the current point and the measured difference, divided by the measured difference. In the same wathe fractional energy add error refers to the d en the previous point and the current point and the measured addition, divided by the measured addition. Problematic Runs While run eight momentum and energy balances are satisfied, its void fraction is clearly impossible. This is because, while the overall pressure drop of 76 kPa in run eight is not high, the pressure gradient in the lower portion of the tube is extremely high, as shown in figure 4-3, comparing runs seven and eight. These runs have similar system pressures and heat fluxes, while their mass fluxes are 873 kg/m 2 -s in run seven and 536 kg/m 2 -s in run eight. For most elevation intervals, there is a low and high void fraction solution for the associated pressur 93

PAGE 94

low void fraction soluti on as an option. This is the only run in the data set in which this problem arisesgardless model onal pressure drop and energy addition errors for run 14 are numeut ressure should also mitigate the difference in pressure loss between the two ence is liquid and vapor density is not too great, and should thus be less sensi e It is noteworthy that this run has always been unique and presented difficulties reof the various modeling methods attempted. As will be shown in the results, run eight pressure profile is significantly different from the predicted pressure profiles from this dissertation and the homogeneous equilibrium model, which happen to trend very closely with each other. As a result of the obviously erroneous void profile, run eight will be excluded from further analysis. Figure 4-4 shows that the fracti rous and relatively large. The algorithm cannot achieve such a low pressure drop for most points given the vapor temperature and energy addition. Run 13 is very similar to 14 in mass flow and system pressure, but with a heat flux of 703 kW/m 2 verses 425 kW/m 2 for run 14. The lower heat flux in run 14 will certainly cause lower pressure loss, but the overall pressure drop 12 kPa verses 32 kPa is a little more than 1/3 rd that of run 13, which seems to be a great reduction given the relatively modest decrease in heat flux. The high system pressure of abo75% of the critical p runs, since the differ tive to the pressure loss associated with vaporization. Finally, the profile of the pressure appears to have two inflection points, which, though possible, indicates a very complicated flowstructure. This reverse s-shape appears in other problem runs. It is interesting to note that run 14 is the only run that is subcooled from an equilibriumstandpoint throughout the length of the heated test section. While the model appears to handlother subcooled conditions adequately, the highly subcooled nature of run 14 may present a special problem. As a result, run 14 will be excluded from the correlation process. 94

PAGE 95

Tube 4 runs, 22-31, have by far the highest mass fluxes in the database. This is likely the reason that four of these runs (22, 26, 29, and 30) exhibit low wall temperatures in the lower portions of the test section. As discussed in chapter 3 and shown in figure 3-11, these runs are associated with pre-CHF conditions and therefore will be excluded from consideration. Two other runs, 28 and 31, produce poor energy balances. Thus, four runs (23, 24, 25, and 27) remafor further consideration. As will be discussed later, these remaining four runs will be exclufrom the c in ded orrelation process since the nature of their test conditions and resulting slips are remoy se data will be misleading. Vapo1. rs to this coefficient. Coefficient values of 5/6th (Burmeisters theoretical result), 2/3rd, and (resulting in ved from the general body of data. Three other runs (32, 36, 44) will also be excluded later, based on their high velocity slip profiles that are inconsistent with all other slip profiles. This will be addressed later. While there are occasional momentum and energy balance errors in other runs, it has been determined that useful information can be obtained from them. Therefore, all other runs will be considered further. Thus, after excluding pre-IFB runs (22, 26, 29, and 30), bad momentum and energbalance runs (14, 28, and 31), and run eight with a bad void profile, there remains a total of 43 runs for further consideration. It is determined from the above discussion that these runs that cannot be satisfactorily processed by the model should be excluded from the analysis of results. This should not be interpreted as a condemnation of the data from these runs, but rather an observation that the model is not capable of resolving the data, and results using tho r Superheat The effect of vapor superheat on the energy balance was investigated by modifying the coefficient to the parenthesized term in Burmeisters (1993) model, presented in equation 3-2Figure 4-5 presents the results using run 39, in which the term C in the legend refe 95

PAGE 96

the coe of measurement is achieved in all but 10 instances, and to wi. in s mean vapor enthalpy. The measured energy input to the flow is less ton the from l, mmonly used mean film temperature) were tried. Increasing the vapor superheat in general improves the overall energy balance. The decision to model the vapor superheat as thmean temperature of the wall and saturation temperature was based upon this analysis. As discussed in chapter 3, using the mean film temperature is consistent with the experimental findings of Nijhawan et al. (1980). Model Results As figure 4-6 shows, the processing of data from these runs does not generate perfect results. Momentum balance within 10% th 5% of measurement for all but 20 points. Energy balance is achieved within 10% of measurement in all but 11 cases, and to within 5% of measurement for all but 44 cases. The great majority of incremental pressure drops and energy additions for each run are well modeledMomentum and energy balances that fall outside the targeted 2% variance from measurement aretypically caused by steep changes in wall temperatures. The reason this causes problems lies the assumption that all of the vapor is at the mean temperature. If the wall temperature increasemarkedly, then so too does the han the energy increase determined from the local pressure and mean vapor temperature. The algorithm selects the energy solution closest to measurement from the quality/void fractidomain generated by the momentum balance, but the energy balance error is still larger than targeted accuracy in these few cases. In these cases, the calculated quality does not change one point to the next Figure 4-7 presents the resulting void profiles from the model for the 43 runs. In generathe void profiles rise steeply but smoothly. Where discontinuities occur, in general there are steep increases in wall temperatures. In this figure, the four lowest void profiles correspond to 96

PAGE 97

runs 23-25, and 27, all on tube 4. These are by far the highest remaining mass flux runs inculled data set. Figure 4-8 presents the resulting velocity slip ratios from the model for the culled dataThe trend of the slip profiles are in general smooth. The high mass flux runs 32, 36, and 44 tube 5 produce the highest slip ratio the set. on s. The trends, while generally smooth for all runs, are somewhat diverse. ntitative comparison is not made here due to the differences in exper Validation of Model Results Figure 4-7 shows that an extremely steep void fraction build-up occurs in IFB, and departs markedly from the relatively shallow build-up predicted by models such as that resulting fromthe Lockhart-Martinelli parameter. These results are consistent with findings of Per Ottosen (1980) in which void profiles in IFB conditions were measured using -ray scattering. Ottosen published the first known results from the use of -ray absorption to measure void fraction in low velocity IFB nitrogen. Figure 4-9 presents results from three of his many runs. It is apparent that void fractions versus equilibrium quality (he made no attempt to quantify true mass quality) rise very steeply. He observed the transition from IAFB to DF at void fractions between 80-90%. All of his experiments were at approximately constant wall temperature conditions. Additionally, all his data represent much lower mass fluxes than these hydrogen data. Perhaps most importantly, the mass velocities were at least an order of magnitude lower than those in these hydrogen data. While a fine qua imental conditions, a qualitative comparison is reasonable. It is apparent that extremely rapid void fraction build-up is a characteristic of IFB. 97

PAGE 98

Rohsenow and coworkers (Dougall and Rohsenow, 1963; Laverty and Rohsenow, 1967; Forslund and Ro hsenow, 1969) used nitrogen in their studies of IFB. In their work, they determre rimental observations agree well with the results of this model. s t ined the actual mass quality. They observed that the transition from IAF to DF occurred at a mass quality of about 10%. Combining this observation with Ottosens of the void fraction at transition, it can be concluded that void fractions of 80 90% at a mass quality of 10% atypical. These expe Range of Validity To avoid the momentum and energy balances of the high mass flux runs on tube 4, the range of validity of this model has been reduced in terms of mass flux only. A total of eight runhave been excluded from further analysis due to the inability of this model to reproduce the pressure drop and energy balances. Forty-three runs remain. The remaining data for which the balances are acceptable have the following range: pressures from 180 kPa to the critical pressure, mass fluxes from 300 kg/m 2 -s to 2500 kg/m 2 -s, and heat fluxes from about 370 kW/m 2 to abou2100 kW/m 2 98

PAGE 99

Table11.28860.961-6360.9611-21 4-1. List of tube numbers, dimensions, and runs executed with the tubes. cmcm21.11360.967-100.85140.47860.9622-3150.79 Tube ref #Inner diameterLengthRun numbers 5 30.4832-51 99

PAGE 100

Table 4-2. Statistical analysis of pressure data show goodness of fit through R 2 and relative unevenness of data through normalized (by pressure drop across test section length) standard deviation. Results are from least squares fit of third order. Norm R2setPa / P1 248 9 0 5 E 03 0 999 2 226 1 03E 02 0 999 3 229 1 .57 E 02 0 998 4 221 1 64E 02 0 998 5 232 1 90E 02 0 99 7 6 23 5 1 20E 02 0 999 7 328 7. 28E 03 1 8 194 5 2 .57 E 02 0 99 5 9 2202 5. 39E 02 0 981 10 2481 1 23E 01 0 92 11 229 1 09E 03 1 12 3 5 8 4 1 7 E 03 1 13 19 5 6 1 5 E 03 1 14 219 1 .7 9E 02 0 998 1 5 232 2 28E 03 1 16 324 2 8 7 E 03 1 1 7 2 7 9 1 11E 03 1 18 236 2 .5 3E 03 1 19 288 1 9 5 E 03 1 20 302 1 .5 0E 03 1 21 301 1 3 5 E 03 1 22 1288 4 .7 1E 03 1 23 408 1 .7 6E 03 1 24 2390 8 .7 9E 03 0 999 2 5 169 7 6 24E 03 1 26 681 4 26E 03 1 2 7 190 7 9 48E 03 0 999 28 2280 1 .5 6E 02 0 998 29 820 7. 86E 03 1 30 942 7. 61E 03 1 31 301 2 .7 6E 03 1 32 5 2 7 9 00E 03 1 33 681 1 00E 02 0 999 34 490 9 63E 03 0 999 3 5 466 1 21E 02 0 999 36 838 1 06E 02 0 999 3 7 888 1 02E 02 0 999 38 642 9 0 7 E 03 1 39 1082 1 01E 02 0 999 40 7557. 31E 03 1 41 10 5 0 9 19E 03 0 999 42 7 40 7. 32E 03 1 43 86 7 6 .55 E 03 1 44 1343 9 90E 03 0 999 4 5 1381 9 .7 8E 03 0 999 46 1894 1 30E 02 0 999 4 7 1084 8 61E 03 1 48 7 4 5 4 99E 03 1 49 7 12 4 6 5 E 03 1 5 0 440 3 34E 03 1 5 1 2010 1 22E 02 0 999 100

PAGE 101

Figure 4-1. Sample of 1961 data wall temperatures. Evident are tube end effects, several apparent discontinuities, and the variation in trending between tests. Figure 4-2. Tube 3 exhibits a consistent reduction in wall temperature at 34 cm. This is likely biased data. 101

PAGE 102

Figure 4-3. While Runs 7 and 8 have fairly similar operating conditions, run 8 pressure gradient in the lower portion of the tube is the steepest in the data set. This causes the model to have difficulty in resolving the quality and slip conditions. Figure 4-4. Run 14 energy and momentum balances are not well matched by the model. 102

PAGE 103

Figure 4-5. Results of modifying the coefficient in Burmeisters equation (Eq 3-21) for the effective film temperature. Increasing vapor temperature improves the energy balance for most high mass flux runs. Figure 4-6. Culled data momentum and energy balance results from model. Not all points are modeled to within 2% of data, but results are acceptable. 103

PAGE 104

Figure 4-7. Calculated void fraction from model for the culled data set. The four lowest voiprofiles are runs 23-25, and 27, with the highest mass fluxes. d Figure 4-8. Velocity slip ratio vs quality from model for the culled data set. The 3 highest slip ratios correspond to runs 32, 36, and 44 on tube 5. 104

PAGE 105

Void Fraction vs. Height for Specified G and Subcooling. Nitrogen, 1 Atmosphere. From Ottosen, 198000.10.20.30.40.50.60.70.80.91010203040506070void fraction, Height from Heated Inlet, cm G=100 kg/m2-sec, Tsub~0 K G=20 kg/m2-sec, Tsub~0 K G=100 kg/m2-sec, Tsub~6 K Figure 4-9.s experiments. Mass flux and inlet subcooling specified. Void fraction vs. equilibrium quality for three runs of Ottosen 105

PAGE 106

CHAPTER 5 EVALUATION AND CORRELATION OF DATA AND CORRELATION ASSESSData Correlation Based on the void and slip profiles versus quality in figures 4-7 and 4-8, it is determthat the remaining runs on tube 4 (runs 23-25, and 27) and runs 32, 36, and 44 on tube five lie too far outside the main body of data and will therefore be excluded from the data correlation process. Thus, there remain 36 runs from which a correlation can be obtained. This gives 398 points, and 362 momentum and energy balances for the effort. The mass fluxes range fromapproximately 300 kg/m2-sec to 1600 kg/m2-sec, the pressure range is from 180 kPa to the critical pressure, heat flux ranges from approximately 370 kW/m2 to 2100 kW/m2, with four different tube diameters, and two different tube lengths. MENT ined the attempt to correlate the resulting void fraction profiles. As figure 4-7 shows, the 36 runs kept for analyses had a relatively tight grouping of void fractions. The fact that the void fraction profiles for all 36 runs grouped together rather tightly presents a difficulty in trying to correlate the data. No good parameter for discriminating between two different runs with similar void profiles yet with significantly different operating conditions was found. While some success was achieved with a correlating parameter composed of heat flux, mass flux, and density ratios, the results were much less than desirable. Therefore, the attempt to directly correlate the void fraction data as a function of known parameters was abandoned. Next, the theory of the drift flux model was applied. In this theory, void fraction is modeled as Three different approaches were attempted to correlate the pressure drop data. First was 106

PAGE 107

j uCgj 0 (5.1) The v er x are based upon a relatively well-mixed flow oto IFB. The literature search did not reh lue of ll these slip predictions are better for some runs relative to the slip correlation of this dissendard method of correlating the distribution parameter and the vapor superficial velocity was used. The ratio of vapor superficial velocity to void fraction was plotted against the olumetric quality, and superficial velocity, j, are known functions of mass flux, quality,and liquid and vapor densities. This leaves the distribution parameter, C 0 and vapor drift velocity, u gj to be determined for void fraction to be predicted. Of the correlations reviewed, C 0 is typically between 1.0 and 1.3 for most flow conditionsAs Zuber and Findlay (1965) pointed out, C 0 can be below 1.0 when the void fraction is highnear the wall than near the centerline an uncommon condition in most pre-critical heat fluflow regimes. However, this is the fundamental nature of IFB. While correlations exist for C 0 and u gj most of them f liquid and vapor. The vapor is concentrated near the center of the pipe. As such, these correlations typically capture the physics of buoyancy effects. Ishii (1977) presented many correlations related to drift flux theory, none of which pertain veal any formulation or correlation that predicts the drift flux terms for separated, higvelocity vertical flow with vapor along the wall. Klausner et al. (1990) recommended a va0.98 for C 0 and 1.12 m/sec for u gj in pre-CHF annular vertical upflow. These values were usedin the analysis of Fu and Klausner (1997) that resulted in good predictions of pressure drop and heat transfer in this flow regime. These values were also applied to the NASA data. Results show that the predicted slip for all points lay between 0.34 and 1.16, with negative slopes for aruns. While rtation, most slips are better predicted by this dissertations model. The sta 107

PAGE 108

mixture superficial vcurves resulted, the slopes and y-intercepts of which give C0 and ugj. The slopes vary around rend. e data than to develop separate corre elocity. Figure 5-1 presents these curves. A family of relatively linear unity, giving distribution parameter values for most points between 0.6 and 1.2. The vapor drift velocity was observed to vary a significant amount from run to run, and not in an obvious tIt was concluded that there may be a better way to correlate thes lations for both the vapor superficial velocity and the distribution parameter. The third approach to correlating the data attempted to predict the velocity slip ratio, defined as l vus u (5.2) Fortunately, this variable varied within an adequate range for the 36 runs, as shown below in figure 5-2. Not only does the level of slip vary to a reasonable degree, but so too did the variation as a function of quality. A literature search for slip and void fraction correlations has revealed numerous published models. A variety of these were applied to these NASA data. The model by Klausner et al. (1990), was implemented, in which for upflow, C is recommended to be 0.98 and U is 1.12 m/s. Table 5-1 presents the accuracies of these correlations at predicting the slip. It is observed that none of these models predict the slip very well. Unfortunately, no slip correlation specifically developed for IFB was found. The Thom correlation (1964) performed the best, with an 81% prediction accuracy to with 50% of this models slip. His model is based on work with boiling water. As a result of the inability of the published correlations to model these data, it was decided to develop a slip correlation. Several different approaches were made to develop a correlating 0gj 108

PAGE 109

parameter for slip. First, a mechanistic relation of the vapor and liquid velocities was pursueapplying law-of-the-wall concepts. The goal of this approach was to develop a relation for thevelocity ratio that allowed the interfacial conditions to cancel out. Using some rather weak assumptions, a transcendental relation for film thickness and flow conditions was derived. It was found that the interfacial velocity would not cancel out in a velocity ratio since it is an additive term to the interfacial vapor velocity. d by ous s of parameters representing test conditions, and various exponents on these parameters. As previously stateslope of the slip as a function of quality varied. These observations led to attempting to develop es orth called the slip factor, f. Ostensibly, a different slip factor could be generated for the 36 y-por will have zero velocity. This fact is not evident in figure 5-2. It appea As a result of this finding, the search for a correlating parameter shifted to trying varicombination d, it was observed that the slip very near a quality of zero and the a correlation that predicted the initial slip (near zero quality) and the slope of the slip as a function of quality. Each component was modeled as a linear function of a correlating parameter. To pursue this approach, the slip profiles for the 36 runs were modeled as linear functions of quality. From this, 36 slip slopes and slip y-intercepts were generated. In turn, the 36 valuof each of these two variables were modeled as functions of the correlating parameter, hencef intercepts and the 36 slopes, each used in a linear model to predict the initial slip and the slip slope. Due to the no-slip condition at the wall, the inception of vapor generation should correspond to a slip of zero. The zero velocity liquid next to the wall is the first liquid to be vaporized, and this va rs that the various slips will extrapolate to finite values at a quality of zero. Probably the 109

PAGE 110

source for this discrepancy lies in the form of the wall friction model used in the pressure drop calculation. Equations 3-15 and 3-29 show that the Blasius equation is used, which is based on law-of-the-wall theory, but is intended for use on a large scale, not for use when the bulk of vapor would be better modeled by near-wall physics. In addition, the validity of law-of-the-wall theory probably deteriorates when the film thickness is extremely thin. The liquid-vapor interface acts as a second wall to alter the the physics from that which is modeled by the Blasius equating oid physics is e detrimental effect on determining the nature of pressure drop is self-mitigating. ion. Regardless, the value of the slip can be extrapolated from the straight line representeach slip curve to a quality of zero, and this family of 36 slips can be correlated. The effect on gross calculations such as pressure drop are minimal, since the void fraction is truly small very near the inlet, whether the slip be modeled is zero at a quality of zero or if it is finite. As vaccumulates, the Blasius equation becomes more accurate, so the error in modeling the reduced. Th A routine of nested Fortran do loops was constructed to optimize the specific dimensionless ratios and their respective exponents that make up the slip factors. A typical trial slip factor might look like the following: edcbcritinavlDLqqGGPP00The nested f (5.3) do loops iterated through each exponent, over the range from .0 to +2.0, in 0.2 incremd do d towards a very large exponent to optimize the correlation. It was determined that the optimizing ents so that 20 different values of each exponent were tried. Therefore, five nesteloops would generate 20 5 or 3.2 million correlating parameters, each to be statistically compared with the 36 y-intercept values and the 36 slope values. In the initial application of this method, it was found that the aspect ratio term, L/D, tende 110

PAGE 111

algorithm tended towards this large aspect ratio exponent easily approaching 5 if allowed inan attempt to accommodate the variation in slip between the 1961 data and the 1966 data, in which the lengths are 0.305m and 0.61m, respectively. This variation in slip could be a result ofexperimental differences. In addition, the variation in tube length in the database does not warrant including a tube length effect. Therefore, it was determined to generate separate scorrelations for the 1961 and 1966 data sets. lip Low Pressure Slip Correlation a applice y-intercept fit and the slope fit, with the correlation coefficients (R2) returned for each fit to determine the goodness. Thus, to optimize the fits of the y-intercepts and the slopes, there will be two slip factors, each one with two coefficients used in ) and y-intercept, and for the slip slope, mslope Within this framework, it was observed that the 1961 data could still be well modeled bythe original slip y-intercept and slip slope method previously discussed. However, this method did not work well for the 1966 data. The correlation coefficients were too low to support this approach. Instead, it was determined that the 1966 data slip profiles could be better modeled asconstant along the length of the tube for each run, but varying for each run. This approach is similar to the work of Rigot (1973), in which he used an average slip value of 2 for his ation. Taking the 1961 data, for each combination that made up the trial slip factor, a linear least squares analysis was performed on both th a linear slip formula. The y-intercepts and slopes will look like the following equations: slip intercept = m int (f int ) + b int (5.4slip slope = m slope (f slope ) + b slope (5.5) Where, for the slip y-intercept, m int and b int are the slope and b slope are the slope and y-intercept. f int and f slope are the slip y-intercept and slip slope factors, hence forth called the intercept slip factor and the slope slip factor. 111

PAGE 112

The following ratios were tried: liquid to vapor viscosity, liquid to vapor density, mass fluxto an average mass flux G e another ratio, and their associated exponents. Also, it was found that the sensifor different ratios. From this analye, tercept 0 (1000 kg/m-sec), heat flux to an average heat flux q 2 0 (1000 kW/m), reduced inlet pressure (to the critical pressure). Note that for the high system pressure correlation analysis, an aspect ratio of tube length to tube diameter was included. It was found that non-linear effects were involved. That is, the optimum exponent on onratio is affected by the presence or absence of 2 tivity of the goodness of fit varied sis, it was determined that the viscosity and mass flux ratios were not important. Thereforthey were eliminated from subsequent analyses. It was also found that the intercept slip factor and slope slip factor were optimized using the same grouping of terms with very nearly the same exponents. The best exponent for the heat flux ratio differed slightly for the intercept and slope slip factors. Thus, with only a small degradation in accuracy, a single slip factor, f 1 can be defined that predicts the slip y-inand slope. The equations for the y-intercept and slope were determined to be slip intercept = -5.20 + 1.12f 1 (5.6) slip slope = (103 -14.9f 1 )x (5.7) where x is the mass quality, and the slip factor is defined by 8.12.18.1qP 01vcritqP 30.4linEf (5.8) The c orrelation coefficients are 0.82 and 0.71 for the slope and y-intercept, respectively. These equations can easily be combined to produce the correlating equation for slip: 1112.120.59.14103fxfs (5.9) 112

PAGE 113

The tef IFB. t it w. The Blasius equation is intended to model 1/7th p-wall r e 1/7th power law profile. Therefore, slip is overestimated. The slip is artificially high d becomes a more accurhappeu. The higher that the initial slip is calculated to be, the more will be the decrease at higher elevations. Thus, the magnitude of the negative slope increases as the initial slip value increases. e liquid to vapor density ratio increases. The pressure ansystem pressures correspond to a lower liquid to vapor density ratio, which normally corresponds st section inlet pressure range over which this correlation applies is up to 500 kPa. Note that the slip factor is not a function of local conditions, and is calculated at the inception oThis is because the slip throughout a run is modeled as a linear function of quality. The slope and y-intercept of the slip are determined at the tube inlet. Low Pressure Slip Correlation Assessment The first observation to be made about the low pressure correlating parameter, f 1 is thahas the opposite effect on the initial slip as it does on the slip slope. Increasing f 1 increases the initial slip, but causes the negative slope of the slip to increase. This must be interpreted in terms of the friction term that is used throughout the flo ower law profiles, which implies that it is to be used for flows in which the near-wall friction effects are only a small component of the overall flow. However, at extremely low qualities near the inlet, the velocity profile is dominated or significantly influenced by nearand buffer region physics. Vapor velocity increases with distance from the wall at a much lowerate than th ue to the fact that friction is underestimated. As the Blasius model ate representation of the vapor flow physics, the slip will become more accurate. This will n when the void fraction increases, ths increasing the vapor film thickness. Since slip is initially too high, it will tend to be reduced farther up the tube The low pressure correlating parameter also shows that the initial slip decreases as system pressure increases, increases as applied heat flux increases, and decreases as th d density effects seem to be contradictory. Higher 113

PAGE 114

to lower slip, which is in direct contradiction to the density ratio effect in the slip factor. However, these dependencies must be interpreted in light of the set of parameters included in the optimizing algorithm. Vapor superheat was not explicitly included in the slip factor optimization algorithm. Therefore, if local vapor superheat is truly an influence, then its effect will be accounted for throrheat, such as the densi ty each gradient also increases consistently with h ugh another parameter that correlates with supe ty ratio. Therefore, the density ratio is likely a surrogate parameter for the effect of superheat on parameters such as vapor viscosity. Isolating the effect of the density ratio, an increase in this parameter is caused by a decrease in vapor density, which in turn is caused by higher vapor temperatures. This also will lead to higher vapor viscosity, and thus, higher frictionand lower vapor velocity. Over a short distance, the liquid velocity does not have time to change, so a reduction in vapor velocity will lead to a reduction in slip. The range of viscosivariation is a factor of roughly 3.5 in these data, which is fairly significant, as a result of the variation in vapor superheat. The pressure parameter is interpreted to account for the density effect. As described above, higher system pressures decrease the liquid to vapor density ratio. The accelerationphase experiences is directly a function of their densities and pressure gradient. Since both phases are subject to the same pressure gradient, the variation in density ratio will control the variation in slip. Thus, higher system pressures should decrease slip. This is consistent with the trend in the slip correlation factor. The initial slip increases with heat flux. The pressure eat flux. As pressure gradient increases, the effect on slip near the inlet will be to increase it, as described above. The significantly lighter vapor will be accelerated much more than the 114

PAGE 115

denser liquid. Thus, slip will increase. Therefore, the heat flux parameter is interpreted asurrogate for the pressure gradient. High Pressure Slip Correlation The high system pressure correlation is simpler since the slip is being modeled as a constant. The slip is correlated with an R s a (5.10) 2 value of 0.72 with the following equation: 37.188.22fs In this, the correlating parameter f 2 is modeled as 4.08.03.02DLvvThe tube inlet pressure range over which this correlation applies is from 500 kPa to thcritical pressure (1284 kPa). Note that there is still an aspect ratio effect, but that the exponent ioptimized at a much lower value than if the 1961 and 1966 data were combined. This dependence reflects the influe fll (5.11) e s nce of the three different tube diameters on the data. e ce both phases are subject to the same pressure gradient, the variatof vapor superheat, just as the density ratio was for the low pressure data. The viscosity ratio shows that, as vapor viscosity decreases, the slip will increase a physically reasonable effect. High Pressure Slip Correlation Assessment Equation 5-11 shows that the high pressure slip increases with increasing liquid to vapor density ratio, increasing liquid to vapor viscosity ratio, and decreasing aspect ratio L/D. The density ratio effect here is interpreted the same way as the pressure ratio effect in thlow pressure slip factor. The acceleration each phase experiences is directly a function of their densities and pressure gradient. Sin ion in density ratio will control the variation in slip. Thus, increasing the liquid to vapor density ratio will increase slip. The liquid to vapor viscosity ratio probably is at least partially a surrogate for the effects 115

PAGE 116

Finally, the effect of the aspect ratio L/D shows that slip increases as this ratio decreaseThis can be interpreted in terms of th s. e difference between the absolute film thickness relative to the void fraction as tube diametarge diameter tube, the film thick same ill be higher. ip Correlations The accuracy of these two correlations at reproducing the model slips are presented in tabular form in table 5-1, and graphically in figure 5-2. Both the table and figure show that excel as a The slip correlationpter 3 to directly solve for th to calcu e 1961 data there are 9 pressure drop increments per test that are unaffmined er varies. Comparing a small and l ness will be larger for the large diameter tube than for the small diameter tube for thevoid fraction. Thus, the average velocity of the vapor with the larger film thickness w Accuracy of the Sl lent agreement is achieved. Figure 5-2 also shows that the high pressure slips from the 1966 experiments (which extend to 55 cm.) are indeed relatively constant, and that the low pressure slips from the 1961 experiments are better modeled by including a slope effectfunction of quality. can now be used in the model described in cha e pressure drop. Instead of iteratively solving for the quality and void fraction pairs that best fit the data, the slip as a function of system parameters and local quality can be used late the local slip and subsequently the void fraction. In this application as applied to a particular length segment, properties are a function of the segment inlet pressure and the average vapor temperature across the length segment. The quality of the slip correlation is assessed by comparing predicted pressure drops withmeasured pressure drops. For th ected by end effects, and 17 tests included for a total of 153 pressure drop increments. For the 1966 data there are 11 acceptable increments per test and 19 tests for a total of 228 increments. Thus, there are 362 pressure drop increments to compare. Accuracy is deter 116

PAGE 117

here igure 5-3 presents the accuracy of predicted versus measured pressure gradients. The dashed lines represent plus andure gradient. All data used to gen re e ofile using the slip correlations, and the dashed green line is the HEM pressus the solid black line is acceleration pressure drop, long d pressure n terms of the percentage of incremental pressure drops that are predicted to within a specified percentage of experimental pressure drops. For comparison purposes, the accuracy of incremental pressure drops calculated from a homogeneous equilibrium model (HEM) that incorporates friction, acceleration, and elevation pressure drop components is included in table 5-2. Fi minus 25% from the measured press erate the slip correlation are included in this plot. The majority of positive error pointscorrespond to the extremely high pressure runs of 15, 16, and 18. Figures 5-4 through 5-39 present model and prediction results for all 36 runs used in thecorrelation. These figures will be referred to as quad plots. In the lower left of each figure athe pressure profiles. The black dots are the measured pressure points, the solid red line is thpredicted pressure pr re profile. In the upper left are the slip profiles. The black dots are the slips that result from the momentum and energy balance model, and the solid red line is the predicted slip. Of course, the HEM slip is unity for all runs, so it has been excluded. The top right plot presentvoid fractions. Again, the black dots are from the balance model, and the solid red line is the void that results from the slip correlations. Finally, the bottom right presents the three pressure drop components from the balance model. The ashed red is from friction, and short dashed green is predicted elevation pressure drop. The HEM pressure profiles frequently have a knee, in which the pressure profile slope is shallow, followed by a significantly steeper region. The knee is the point at which equilibrium quality changes from negative to positive. It can be seen in these runs that the measured 117

PAGE 118

profile does not show any inflection at these points. The predicted pressure profile reflects characteristic, showing no impact from transitioning from negative to positive equilibrium quality. Some of the lowest pressure runs show that the HEM predicts a pressure loss that would gen this erate a negative pressure. That is, HEM is incapable of predicting pressure in these cases. These process. The runs that lend themst ting e ux pressu from the measured pressure profile. Run eight is suspected to have some inconsistency in its particular points are omitted from the HEM pressure profiles. Validation of the Slip Correlations Validation of these slip correlations is supported in several ways. First, the correlations can be applied to runs that were not included in the slip correlation elves to this application are those that had acceptable momentum and energy balances, buthat were deemed to have slip or void profiles too removed from the main body of data to keep. These runs are 23, 24, 25, 27, 32, 36, and 44, and their quad plots are presented in figures 5-40 through 5-46. It is evident that the high pressure correlation does not perform well at predicthe pressure drops of the very high mass flux runs 23, 24, 25, and 27. The HEM does significantly better. However, the low pressure correlation performs extremely well on the threruns 32, 36, and 44, which are among the highest mass flux runs of the 1961 data, though still significantly lower than the other four runs. These runs also are at the lower end of the heat flrange on tube five. Therefore, it appears that the high pressure correlation is limited in range of mass flux. Validation of the high pressure correlation is evident in the failure to reproduce the re profile of run eight, given in figure 5-47. This is considered a validating result becauseof the difficulty run eight gives the HEM at reproducing the measured pressure, and that the predicted pressure and HEM pressure are so similar to each other while departing significantly 118

PAGE 119

data that causes this difficulty. It is noteworthy that run eight has stood out as drastically different than all other runs during all variations of data modeling. Th e ranges of validity of the two correlations should be listed separately. The low pressure correl onditions of 600 kPa to the critical pressure, mass fluxes f0 kg/m2-s, and heat fluxes from n in the e w pressure correlation performs very well, in general. Runs that are less well predicruns re gh, ation is valid from pipe inlet conditions of 180 kPa to 500 kPa, mass fluxes from approximately 580 kg/m 2 -s to 1650 kg/m 2 -s, and heat fluxes from approximately 380 kW/m 2 to1650 kW/m 2 The high pressure correlation is valid from pipe inlet c rom approximately 330 kg/m 2 -s to 155 approximately 700 kW/m 2 to 2100 kW/m 2 Note that since the low pressure correlation appeared to perform slightly better than the high pressure correlation, it is recommended to extrapolate the low pressure correlation range from the experimental maximum of 500 kPa up to 600 kPa. Observations The high pressure slip correlation can predict the pressure profile with good accuracy even for length segments for which the energy balance was not well satisfied. These are seefigures as points in which slip and void change value while the quality remains constant. The high pressure correlation does not appear to work well for all extremely high pressure runs. Thhighest pressure runs, 15, 16, and 18, are not well reproduced, particularly in the upper half of the tube. However, other high pressure runs, such as 4, 5, and 7, are reasonably well modeled. The lo ted tend to be those that have a low mass flux to heat flux ratio. However, the three that were excluded from the correlation optimization process are quite well reproduced. The plots of the three different pressure drop components show that acceleration pressudrop is always the main contributor. Friction varies between several percent to up to 50% of thetotal pressure loss, and elevation pressure drop is insignificant. Since flow velocities are so hi 119

PAGE 120

it might be expected that friction would be a larger contributor to the total pressure loss. Athe HEM frictional component is consistently significantly higher th lso, an this model predicts. This is inte w. n of no significant liquid heating (all heated liquid is vaporized), and initializing quality at zero at the inlet appear to be reasonable approximations. rpreted to represent the nature of relatively low friction that vapor generates. The combination of low hydrogen vapor viscosity, which in general is about an order of magnitude lower that the liquid viscosity, and the low vapor density combine to cause the vapor friction to be relatively low. In essence, the liquid is riding through the tube on a vapor blanket, thus reducing friction. The slip correlations and this momentum and energy balance model provide a method inwhich pressure drop can be accurately predicted regardless of the subcooled nature of the floThe knees observed in the HEM greatly limit its usefulness in the subcooled region. The assumptio 120

PAGE 121

Table 5-1. Accuracies of some common slip correlations. Slip Model Source10%20%30%40%50%Model Pasch47%78%91%95%98%CISE (Premoli, 1970)6%16%31%44%57%Bankoff (1960)7%12%17%23%28%Chisholm (1983)12%23%34%43%52%Zivi (1964)1%3%6%8%12%Klausner (1990)4%15%27%39%52%Ahrens (1983)8%26%36%54%65%Wallis (1969)1%2%2%4%4%Lockhart & Martinelli (1949)16%31%43%57%67%Zuber & Findlay (1965)12%23%33%44%51%Coddington (2002)16%26%36%51%64%Thom (1964)16%30%57%71%81%Baroczy (1965)12%25%37%46%55%Accuracy to within Smith (1969)12%25%34%43%51% xxyvlvllvl1 GDDGeGDeyeyeyesll0273.02578.112211108.051.0222.019.0 4.01eeesv 111xxexxel v1 xxl17.0 v lxs11 3vls 1 12.198.011010gjvgjlvuCGxuxxC 2.0vls 108.040.072.011vllvxx 107.036.064.0128.01vllvxx 25.02053.12.1lvlgjguC 8.0123.0363.5305.1581.8772.60062.1357.2220 P P E GEPEPEuPECgj 118.089.00.111vllvxx 113.065.074.011vllvxx 121

PAGE 122

Table 5-2. Comparison of pressure drop prediction accurac y for the homogeneous equilibrium model and the current slip correlation. Figure 5-1. Vapor velocity vs. superficial velocity. odel10%20%30%40%50%12%27%37%46%56%lip correlation42%66%81%85%89%Accurac MHEMs y to within 122

PAGE 123

Figure 5-2. Comparison of model slip and slip predicted from correlations. Figure 5-3. Predicted versus measured pressure gradients for all data used in correlating slip. 123

PAGE 124

Figure 5-4. Model and prediction results for run 1. 124

PAGE 125

Figure 5-5. Model and prediction results for run 2. 125

PAGE 126

126 Figure 5-6. Model and prediction results for run 3. 126

PAGE 127

Figure 5-7. Model and prediction results for run 4. 127

PAGE 128

Figure 5-8. Model and prediction results for run 5. 128

PAGE 129

Figure 5-9. Model and prediction results for run 6. 129

PAGE 130

Figure 5-10. Model and prediction results for run 7. 130

PAGE 131

Figure 5-11. Model and prediction results for run 9. 131

PAGE 132

Figure 5-12. Model and prediction results for run 10. 132

PAGE 133

Figure 5-13. Model and prediction results for run 11. 133

PAGE 134

134 Figure 5-14. Model and prediction results for run 12. 134

PAGE 135

Figure 5-15. Model and prediction results for run 13. 135

PAGE 136

Figure 5-16. Model and prediction results for run 15. 136

PAGE 137

Figure 5-17. Model and prediction results for run 16. 137

PAGE 138

Figure 5-18. Model and prediction results for run 17. 138

PAGE 139

Figure 5-19. Model and prediction results for run 18. 139

PAGE 140

Figure 5-20. Model and prediction results for run 19. 140

PAGE 141

141 Figure 5-21. Model and prediction results for run 20. 141

PAGE 142

Figure 5-22. Model and prediction results for run 21. 142

PAGE 143

Figure 5-23. Model and prediction results for run 33. 143

PAGE 144

144 Figure 5-24. Model and prediction results for run 34. 144

PAGE 145

Figure 5-25. Model and prediction results for run 35. 145

PAGE 146

Figure 5-26. Model and prediction results for run 37. 146

PAGE 147

147 Figure 5-27. Model and prediction results for run 38. 147

PAGE 148

Figure 5-28. Model and prediction results for run 39. 148

PAGE 149

149 Figure 5-29. Model and prediction results for run 40. 149

PAGE 150

Figure 5-30. Model and prediction results for run 41. 150

PAGE 151

Figure 5-31. Model and prediction results for run 42. 151

PAGE 152

152 Figure 5-32. Model and prediction results for run 43. 152

PAGE 153

Figure 5-33. Model and prediction results for run 45. 153

PAGE 154

154 Figure 5-34. Model and prediction results for run 46. 154

PAGE 155

Figure 5-35. Model and prediction results for run 47. 155

PAGE 156

Figure 5-36. Model and prediction results for run 48. 156

PAGE 157

Figure 5-37. Model and prediction results for run 49. 157

PAGE 158

Figure 5-38. Model and prediction results for run 50. 158

PAGE 159

Figure 5-39. Model and prediction results for run 51. 159

PAGE 160

Figure 5-40. Model and prediction results for run 23. 160

PAGE 161

Figure 5-41. Model and prediction results for run 24. 161

PAGE 162

Figure 5-42. Model and prediction results for run 25. 162

PAGE 163

Figure 5-43. Model and prediction results for run 27. 163

PAGE 164

Figure 5-44. Model and prediction results for run 32. 164

PAGE 165

Figure 5-45. Model and prediction results for run 36. 165

PAGE 166

Figure 5-46. Model and prediction results for run 44. 166

PAGE 167

167 Figure 5-47. Model and prediction results for run 8. 167

PAGE 168

CHAPTER 6 HEAT TRANSFER ANALYSIS Data Omission The data that are considered in the heat transfer portion of this analysis include somthat were excluded in the momentum analysis. Runs eight, 14, 22 31, 32, 36, and 44 were all excluded from the velocity slip correlation process for various reasons. Hothe heat transfer analysis is entirely different. Instead of trying to reproduce pressure measurements with an iterative formulation that is a highly sensitive function ofpressure gradient and vapor superheat, the heat transfer coefficient (HTC) mstable and always converge for any reasonable input. For this reason, all runs in the data set can be considered in the analare not IFB. That is, only runs 22, 26, 29, and 30 must be excluded fromanalysis. Based on the large difference in predicted pressures from the HEM manalysis predictions compared with the measured pressure as seen in figure 5-47, run eight will also be excluded. The difference between measured and predicted pressurethe validity of the data for run eight. The points influenced by end effectTherefore, in runs 1-31, the first point will be excluded, while in runs 32-513 will be excluded. This gives 26 runs with 12 points of measuremruns with 10 points of measurement for the 1961 data. In all, there are The Nature of IFB Heat Transfer Much of the understanding derived from experiments relevant to IFB has already been presented in chapter one. Comparison of the HTC of these hydrogen data with those trends are e runs wever, the nature of the measured odels are always ysis except those that the heat transfer odel and this s calls into question s will still be excluded. 1, points one, two, and ent for the 1966 data, and 20 512 points for analysis. discussed below. 168

PAGE 169

The General HTC Profile Both Takenaka (1989) and Hammouda (1997) experiments generated HTC versus quality profiles as presented in figure 6-1. Both of their experiments involved visual observations of the flow as well as local measurements necessary to determine the HTC. In figure 6-1, it is noted that there is a general decrease in HTC from the initial level when the fluid is subcooled, as the working fluids in both of their experiments were. This is the region of IAFB, in which the vapor film thickness is increasing, thus increasing the resistance to transferring heat from the wall to the low energy liquid, which acts as a heat sink. A minimum is attained near an equilibrium quality of zero. The minimum HTC value is associated with transition from IAFB to AIAFB, or ISFB for very low mass fluxes. The breakup of the liquid core is associated with an inflection point in the HTC. It is after this flow regime transition from AIAFB to DFB that the mass flux influences the gradient of the HTC as a function of quality. Lower mass fluxes decrease this slope. In general, the HTC variations discussed above have been observed in these hydrogen data. For subcooled flows, there is a reduction in HTC up to an equilibrium quality near zero, at which point the minimum is achieved. Figure 6-2 shows this trend for runs 11 through 14. In this figure, the HTC is plotted versus equilibrium quality. It can be seen that the HTC consistently decreases up to an equilibrium quality near zero, followed by a rise. Note that run 14 never attains a positive equilibrium quality, and its HTC trend is generally downwards throughout the length of the tube. There is variation in threlatively small variation in the equilibrium quality at which it occurs. These trends are ich significant subcooling is prevalent. The best subset of data that show the variation in HTC as a function of mass flux after the transition from AIAFB to DFB are the 1961 data. In these, there is very little subcooling, so the e magnitude of the HTC at the minimum, and a primarily observed in the 1966 data, in wh 169

PAGE 170

reduction in HTC is not evid ent. It appears that these data have very short segments of IAFB, if any, ase h he heat transfer as a single-phase vapor flowing between two boundaries that are at differ or the fects on the level nd proceed to the AIAFB regime very quickly. There appears to be a transition from AIAFB to DFB, though, in which the mass flux impact is evident. Figures 6-3 and 6-4 show this effect for runs 39-42, and 44-47. An Interpretation of Controlling Effects in IFB Heat Transfer An approach to understandng the nature of IFB heat transfer is to view the vapor film as a barrier through which heat is transmitted from the wall to the heat sink-like liquid (Giarratano and Smith, 1965). This seems logical since the vapor temperature does not, in general, increamonotonically up the length of the tube as a single-phase fluid would under constant heat flux conditions. In fact, the vapor temperature, assuming the mean film temperature method appliesoften decreases along the length of the tube. Therefore, the heat is getting from the wall, througthe vapor, and to the liquid, causing vaporization. It is thus reasonable to consider modeling tnature of ent temperatures. Takenaka (1989) concluded this as well, though he extended the concept to distinguish between the three main flow regimes IAFB, AIAFB, and DFB. He observed that his IAFBdata Nusselt numbers were well modeled by using only the vapor film Reynolds number. Fromthis, he concluded that the heat transfer in IAFB is governed by the characteristics of the vapfilm. He also considered that DFB is similar to the typical post-dryout dispersed flow boiling heat transfer, and can therefore be modeled by established theory. Finally, he believed thatcomplexity of the geometry of AIAFB would make this regime very difficult to model. Within this framework and with an understanding of the flow regimes, the ef and trend of the HTC can be considered. There are five factors to consider; vapor properties (a function of pressure and temperature), mass velocity, level of turbulence, film 170

PAGE 171

thickness, and interfacial area for heat transfer from the vapor to the liquid. Liquid properties areessentially constant in all runs. To start with, the flow is in the IAFB regime. The level of turbulence is relatively low, and as void fraction increases, the film thickness increases and the interfacial area for heat transfer de creases. These factors support the conclusion that the HTC a show. Then, as the liquid core b nd in the e following functional relationship for the properties index: should decrease in IAFB as void increases, which the hydrogen dat ecomes agitated, the area for heat transfer to the liquid will increase. While the film thickness will still be increasing, the heat transfer area will increase, leading to a leveling off ofthe decreasing HTC. Finally, as the liquid core breaks up entering the DFB regime, the heat transfer area increases greatly, leading to a rise in the HTC. In this regime, the mass velocity alevel of turbulence are controlling factors for the HTC trend. As both increase, so too does the HTC. Throughout these variations of flow structure and conditions, the vapor is changing pressure and temperature. Figure 6-5 shows the variation of the vapor properties containedDittus-Boelter HTC model, seen in th 4.0vvvCIt is seen in this figure that, for a given run, the variation in pressure has, at most, a small impact on the properties index. For a particular run, the impact of temperature on the propertiesindex is large for high pressure runs, and small for low pressure runs. This explains why the HTC does not vary as much at lower pressures as it does at higher pressures. At low pressure, the vapor temperature can vary significantly with minimal impact on the HTC, while at h ,6.08.0vpkfh (6.1) igh pressuher re, the same temperature variation will have a significant impact. Figure 6-5 also shows that the property index is a strong function of pressure. Higher pressures will lead to hig 171

PAGE 172

properties indices, and therefore higher HTCs. These observations are consistent with the HTC levels and trends observed in these hydrogen data. Assessment of Various Models The most accepted pre-CHF boiling HTC models have been applied to these data and found to completely fail. It is necessary to employ a model that is designed for the IFB conditions. Chapter one presents an extensive overview of the work and models associatedheat transfer in IFB. Therefore, this information will not be repeated here. A few models in the literature predict an experimental HTC based on a standard Dittus-Boelter model with a modifying multiplier or correlating parameter that uses the Lockhart-Martinelli parameter with e rium quality is used, which makes them inapplicable to a significant portion of these NASAty so equilibrium quality not mass quality. These two correlations were used with mass quality, but the predictive accuracies of the two models suffered significantly. To model these NASA data, eithere tt (Hendricks et al. 1961, 1966, Brentari et al., 1965). In these models, thequilib data. In these cases, the mass quality was inserted in place of the equilibrium qualithat they could be applied to the subcooled data. The 1961 and 1966 correlations cannot be modified in this way because they are, in fact, statistically generated correlations based on the mass quality must be used, or quality must be excluded from the correlation. The accuracies of these models are evaluated in terms of their ability to reproduce the experimental HTC, exactly the same way that the pressure drop prediction accuracies were assessed. Table 6-1 presents the results of this statistical analysis. In this table, the percent of the 512 measurements predicted within the specified percent accuracy are listed. Note that thtwo Hendricks correlations were evaluated against just the positive equilibrium quality data, resulting in only 364 predictions. 172

PAGE 173

The Hendricks correlations perform the best of all the applied models, but only for the positive equilibrium quality data. The 148 subcoole d points can be considered as zero correlations, which greatly reducdel. Since it is important to be able tN3095 andard coefficient of 0.0236-ensity eral, es the overall accuracy of the mo o predict the HTC in subcooled conditions, the Hendricks correlations should be compared with other models with this in mind. Figure 6-6 compares the predicted HTC using the Tcorrelation and the experimental HTC. Note that the subcooled data are zeros on this plot. Three versions of the Dittus-Boelter model were tried, all using the st and exponents on Reynolds number of 0.8 and Prandtl number of 0.4. The first in table 1 used bulk conditions evaluated using saturated property values, with a quality-weighted dand specific heat, and the McAdams two-phase viscosity model. The McAdams method of determining two-phase transport properties was also applied to thermal conductivity. In genthe approach applied in this analysis is as follows: 11llx (6.2) vTPThe second method listed used properties evaluated at the vapor film conditions. The third version of the Dittus-Boelter model in the table used the method of the first model, but with the vapor-to-wall temperature ratio multiplier of equation 1-44 applied. It is interesting to see that this approach provided the most accurate and consistent model applied to all the 512 points. Figure 6-7 compares the predicted HTC using this modified equilibrium Dittus-Boelter model and the experimental HTC. Note that all 512 points are included in the plot. The points that are predicted extremely high are associated with the highest mass flux runs it the data set. It is apparent after comparing figures 6-6 and 6-7 that the Hendricks 1966 correlation is preferred to any other model in table 6-1 when it can be used. If the flow is subcooled, then the modified 173

PAGE 174

equilitween two boundaries at different temperatures, as previously discussed. Models that focus on the effects of buoyancy such as Bromleys, Baileys and Berensons, simply do not capture the physics of the mechanisms involved in forced convection heat transfer. The convective nature of these data must be included in an effective model. However, it appears that all the forced convection models applied to these data are incapable of reproducing the HTC in the IAFB region, in which the HTC value is actually decreasing. The physics associated with the downward trend in the HTC observed in runs 11-14 in figure 6-2 is not included in these models. From the AIAFB onwards through the DFB regions, the characteristics of the HTC are reasonably well modeled by most of the forced convection models. The models applied to these data vary in the magnitude of the HTC predicted, but this is not important as it can easily be brium Dittus-Boelter model should be used, but with caution, particularly for very high mass flux conditions. Papadimitriou and Skorek (1991) applied the temperature ratio defined in equation 1-44 to the Dougall and Rohsenow (1963) model. The results of that modification as applied to these hydrogen data can be seen in table 6-1, referenced as Dougall-modified. It is seen that this modification actually decreases the accuracy of the basic Dougall model. Laverty and Forslund followed Dougall, working with Rohsenow at MIT. They each studied various aspects of IFB and generated predictive models, as presented in chapter one. Forslunds model performed the best of the three basic MIT models. It is interesting to note that the other model that performs reasonably well is the Kays model, which is developed for flow between two parallel plates. This fact supports the approach of modeling the flow as a barrier to heat transfer be 174

PAGE 175

remedied by adjusting the coefficient on the model. The important feature to evaluate is whetthe model captures the her complicated trends of the HTC as a function of quality. ter reflects the physical propes, t a ure the physics of the vapor film. ed It appears that a good approach to reproducing these trends is to include a wall temperature parameter. As Papadimitriou and Skorek (1991) did, and as is commonly done, a simple, dimensionless way to include this effect is to apply the ratio of wall to vapor temperature to some power. The general argument for including such a term is that it bet rties of the vapor film. However, if superheated vapor properties are used in the modelthen including a temperature ratio multiplier must be viewed as a correlating parameter and nomechanistic parameter, since the vapor properties should already capt If saturated conditions are used for both fluids, then the temperature ratio could be viewas a mechanistically-based multiplier. 175

PAGE 176

Table 6-1. Comparison of predictive accuracy of various IFB models. Figure 6-1. Variation of the HTC as a function of quality in IFB flow. Quality HTC IAFB AIAFB DFB low mass flux medium mass flux high mass flux TN 765 (1961)36431%61%81%92%97%1.28Bromley (1950)5120%0%0%0%0%1.33Forslund (1968)51210%19%31%53%69%1.43Kays (1980)51220%35%48%60%68%1.44Accuracy to within HTC Model Source# points10%20%30%40%50%Model (eqn)TN 3095 (1966)36435%64%83%93%97%1.32DB-equilibrium bulk51210%26%42%57%70%1.47DB-film51225%40%52%64%72%1.47DB-modified equilibrium bulk51232%53%67%77%84%1.46 & .47Bromley forced convection (1953)51219%35%45%51%57%1.35Dougall (1961)51212%22%29%37%49%1.40Dougall-modified5125%14%25%37%46%1.40 & .46Laverty (1967)5121%3%7%17%34%1.42Wallis-Collier (1968)5120%0%0%2%10%1.38Berenson (1961)5120%0%0%0%0%1.37Bailey (1972)5120%0%0%0%0%1.45 176

PAGE 177

177 Figure 6-2. Variation of HTC versus equilibrium quality in the IAFB flow regime. Figure 6-3. Variation of HTC versus mass quality for runs 39-42. Mas s flux units are kg/m2-sec. Trend shows that increasing mass flux increases HTC slope.

PAGE 178

Figure 6-4. Variation of HTC versus mass quality for runs 44-47. Mass flux units aTrend shows that increasing mass flux increases HTC slope. re kg/m2-sec. Figure 6-5. Variation of Dittus-Boelter vapor properties with pressure and temperature. 178

PAGE 179

Figure 6-6. Comparison of predicted HTC using the TN 3095 correlation with the experimental HTC. Note subcooled points are set to zero. Figure 6-7. Comparison of predicted HTC using the modified equilibrium bulk Dittus-B oelter model with the experimental HTC. 179

PAGE 180

CHAPTER 7 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS General Conclusions Local pressure and wall temperatures measurements were recorded in steady state, high heat flux conditions with liquid hydrogen entering the bottom of vertical, highly heated metal test sections. Test conditions were such that constant heat flux was established, all heat generated by the applied voltage went into heating the hydrogen, and mass flow rates and inlet conditions were measured. With the heat flux and local wall temperature measurements, the local heat transfer coefficient was determined at 12 locations. Fifty-one tests were conducted, producing 612 points of data. The range of test sections included five different tube diameters ranging from 0.48 cm to 1.29cm, and two different tube lengths of 30.5 cm and 61.0cm. Inlet 327 kg/m2-s to 3444 kg/m-s, and heat fluxes from 294 kW/m2 to 2093 kW/m2. It was determined that most of the 612 points were in various regimes of inverted film boiling. It was also determined that these hydrogen data behave similarly to other fluids used in previous studies of inverted film boiling. Based on the literature search, it is believed that these data are unique for all hydrogen data in the extent of measurements recorded, heat and mass fluxes, and unique in all inverted film boiling data in the range of system pressures. Therefore, this data set is extremely valuable and should be exploited to the fullest extent possible. The available data allows for reverse engineering the mass quality, void fraction, and velocity slip by applying a five-equation model and three fundamental assumptions. These assumptions are that the liquid core does not experience sensible heating (which implies a homogeneous, solid liquid core), the vapor temperature is at the mean film temperature, and a pressures ranged from 188 kPa to approximately the critical pressure, mass fluxes ranged from 2 180

PAGE 181

turbulent Blasius-based wall friction corre Rogers friction multiplier is valid throughout the flow. Pressure Drop Conclusions and Recommendations From the results of this reverse-engineering method, two velocity slip correlations were developed, one for system inlet pressures above 600 kPa, and the other for system inlet pressures below 600 kPa. Note that since the low pressure correlation appeared to perform slightly better than the high pressure correlation, it is recommended to extrapolate the low pressure correlation range from the experimental maximum of 500 kPa up to 600 kPa. The resulting slip correlations have been shown to reproduce the pressure profiles very well, much better than the homogeneous equilibrium model. Of particular importance is the fact that pressure drops are well modeled even in subcooled conditions a result that the homogeneous equilibrium model cannot reproduce. Since the pressure profiles were generally smooth with no points of inflection except at the highest system pressures, it is determined that flow regime transitions do not significantly affect the pressure gradient. It is recommended that the pressure drop of inverted film boiling flows be modeled using the low and high pressure slip correlations presented in equations 5-8 through 5-11 and the conservation and closure conditions presented in chapter 3. The low pressure correlation is valid from pipe inlet conditions of 180 kPa to 600 kPa, mass fluxes from approximately 580 kg/m2-s to 1650 kg/m2-s, and heat fluxes from approximately 380 kW/m2 to 1650 kW/m2. The high pressure correlation is valid from pipe inlet conditions of 600 kPa to the critical pressure, mass fluxes from approximately 330 kg/m2-s to 1550 kg/m2-s, and heat fluxes from approximately 700 kW/m2 to 2100 kW/m2. lation with the 181

PAGE 182

Heat Transfer Conclusions and Recommendations The heat transfe r coefficient data were found difficult to predict and highly dependent ns completely fail to predict the heat transf tions, are not esented in equation 1-45 with the multiplier in equation 1-44,be n. fraction, and sensible heating of the liquid. Additionally, better models for the heat transfer coefficient are likely possible. It is expected that upon the flow regime. Pre critical heat flux correlatio er of inverted film boiling conditions. Pool boiling models for inverted film boiling also are inappropriate. Current forced convection models for inverted film boiling, while far better than the previous two classes of models, still generate large predictive errors. In particular, the physics of inverted annular film boiling, which produce negative slopes with respect to quality, isnot captured by any model applied to these data. This indicates that the increasing film thickness, decreasing vapor-liquid heat transfer area, and changing vapor film condiwell modeled. The agitated inverted annular film boiling and dispersed film boiling data are better modeled, which indicates that the turbulence-based physics of heat transfer in these regimes is included in convective heat transfer models. It is recommended that for the inverted annular film boiling flow regime the modifiedequilibrium bulk Dittus-Boelter model, pr be used. For agitated inverted annular film boiling and dispersed film boiling regimes associated with positive equilibrium qualities, the Hendricks model in equation 1-32 should used. Recommendations for Future Efforts It is likely that mechanistic models can be generated for the velocity slip or void fractioTo accomplish this, it is necessary to make measurements for any or all of the conditions for which assumptions were made in this effort. This includes such measurements as wall friction, radial velocity and temperature profiles, void 182

PAGE 183

separate models will be necessary for the inverted annu lar regimes and the agitated and dispersed regim es. 183

PAGE 184

LIST OF REFERENCES Ahrens, F W., 1983. Heat Pump Modeling, Simulation and Design. Heat Pump Fundamentals, Proceedings of the NATO Advanced Study Institute of Heat, Pump Fundamentals, Espinho, Spain. Ed. J. Berghmans, The Hague, Netherlands. Arpaci, Vedat S., 1966, Conduction heat transfer, Addison-Wesley, New York, 283. Babelli, I., Revankar, S. T., Ishii, M. 1994, Flow visualization study of post-critical heat flux in inverted flow. Nuclear Engineering and Design 146, 15-24. Bailey, J. G. M., 1972. The interaction of droplet and forced convection in post dryout heat transfer at high subcritical pressures, European Two-Phase Flow Group Meeting, Rome, Italy. Bankoff, S. G., 1960, A variable density single fluid model for two-phase flow with particular reference to steam-water flow, Journal of Heat Transfer, 82, 265. Baroczy, C. J., 1965, Correlation of liquid fraction in two-phase flow with applications to liquid metals, Chemical Engineering Progress Symposium Series, 61 (57), 179-191. Berenson, P. J., 1961, Film-boiling heat transfer from a horizontal surface, Journal of Heat Transfer, 83, 351-358. Bjorge, Robert W., Hall, Garry R., Rohsenow, Warren M. 1982, Correlation of forced convection boiling heat transfer data. International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer 25 (6), 753-757. Brentari, E. G., Giarratano, P. J., Smith, R. V. Sept., 1965, Boiling heat transfer for oxygen, nitrogen, hydrogen, and helium. Technical Note 317, National Bureau of Standards, Boulder, Colorado. Bromley, L. A., LeRoy, N. R., Robbers, J. A. 1953, Heat transfer in forced convection film boiling. Industrial and Engineering Chemistry 45 (12), 2639-2646. Bromley, LeRoy A. May, 1950, Heat transfer in stable film boiling. Chemical Engineering Progress 46 (5), 221-227. Carey, Van P. 1992, Liquid-vapor phase-change phenomena. Taylor & Francis, New York. Celata, G. P. 1998, Modeling of critical heat flux in subcooled flow boiling. Heat Transfer Research 29 (45), 307-319. Celata, G. P., Cumo, M., Mariani, A. 1996, The effect of the tube diameter on the critical heat flux in subcooled flow boiling. International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer 39 (8), 1755-1757. 184

PAGE 185

Celata, G. P., Cumo, M., Mariani, A G. 1994, Rationalization of existing mechanistic models for the prediction of water subcooled flow boiling critical heat Celattical heat flux prediction for saturated flow boiling of water in vertical tubes. International Journal of Heat and Mass d Development 5 (3), 322-Chish es in smooth tubes and channels. International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer Chisheorge Godwin of Chuncritical heat flux at subcooled and low quality flow boiling. Nuclear Engineering and Coddington, Paul, Macian, Rafael 2002, A study of the performance of void fraction correlations used in the context of drift-flux two-phase flow models. Nuclear Engineering and Design Collievective boiling and condensation. 2nd Edition, McGraw-Hill, Core,udies. WADD TR 60239 Wright Air Development Center Aerojet-General Corporation. Dougall, Richard S., Rohsenow, Warren M. Sept., 1963, Film boiling on the inside of vertical ion Engineering 4, 146-150. ., Simoncini, M., Zummo, flux. International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer 37 (1), 347-360. a, Gian Piero, Mishima, Kaichiro, Zummo, Giuseppe 2001, Cri Transfer 44, 4323-4331. Chen, John C. Jul., 1966, Correlation for boiling heat transfer to saturated fluids in convective flow. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Process Design an 329. olm, D. 1973, Pressure gradients due to friction during the flow of evaporating two-phasemixtur 16, 347-358. olm, D., 1983, Two-phase flow in pipelines and heat exchangers, G Longman Group Limited, New York. Tae Hyun, Baek, Won Pil, Chang, Soon Heung 2000, An integral equation model for Design 199, 13-29. Class, C. R., DeHaan, J. R., Piccone, M., Cost, R. B. 1959, Boiling heat transfer to liquid hydrogen from flat surfaces. Advances in Cryogenic Engineering 5, 254-261. 215 (3), 199-216. r, John G. 1981, Con Berkshire, England. T. C., Harkee, J. F., Misra, B., Sato, K. Sept., 1959, Heat transfer st tubes with upward flow of the fluid at low qualities. report 9079-26a, Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Ehrlich, Melvin P. 1991, Thermodynamically pumped IR laser. Proceedings of the 26th Intersociety Energy Convers Forslund, R. P., Rohsenow, W. M. Nov., 1968 Dispersed flow film boiling. Journal of Heat Transfer 90, 399-407. 185

PAGE 186

Fu, Feng, Klausner, James F. 1997, A separated flow model for predicting two-phase pressudrop and evaporative heat transfer for vertical annular flow. International Journal of Heat and Fluid Flow 18, 541-549. re Giarratano, P. J., Smith, R. V. Aug., 1965, Comparative study of forced convection boiling heat 6. Gungor, K. E., Winterton, R. H. S. Mar., 1986, A general correlation for flow boiling in tubes and annuli. International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer 29 (3), 351-358. Gung mparisons of correlations with data. Chemical Engineering Research and Design 65 (2), 148-156. Hamm. C. 1996, An experimental study of subcooled film boiling of refrigerants in vertical up-flow. International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer Hammld, D. C., Cheng, S. C. 1997, Two-fluid modeling of inverted annular film boiling. International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer 40 (11), 2655-2670. Hedaline with liquid nitrogen. Journal of Thermophysics and Heat Transfer 7 (3), 426-434. Hendre drop of liquid hydrogen flowing through a heated tube. NASA TN D-765 NASA. Hendricks, R. C., Graham, R. W., Hsu, Y. Y., Friedman, R. Mar., 1966, Experimental heat transfer results for cryogenic hydrogen flowing in tubes at subcritical and supercritical Hsu, Y. Y., Westwater, J. W. 1960, Approximate theory for film boiling on vertical surfaces. Incro P., 2002, Fundamentals of heat and mass transfer, 5 edition, John Wiley & Sons, New York. Ishii, titutive equations for relative motion between phases in various two-phase flow regimes. ANL 7747, Argonne National Ishii, M., De Jarlais, G. 1987, Flow visualization study of inverted annular flow of post dryout heat transfer region. Nuclear Engineering and Design 99, 187-199. Fujii, T., Takenaka, N., Asano, H., Yasuda, T. 2005, Heat transfer and pressure drop of inverted annular flow. personnally sent by author, 171-176. transfer correlations for cryogenic fluids. Advances in Cryogenic Engineering 11, 492-50 or, K. E., Winterton, R. H. S. Mar., 1987, Simplified general correlation for saturated flowboiling and co ouda, N., Groeneveld, D. C., Cheng, S 39 (18), 3799-3812. ouda, N., Groeneve yatpour, A., Antar, B. N., Kawaji, M. JulySept., 1993, Cool-down of a vertical ricks, R. C., Graham, R. W., Hsu, Y. Y., Friedman, R. May, 1961, Experimental heat transfer and pressu pressures to 800 pounds per square inch. NASA TN D-3095. Chemical Engineering Progress Series 56, 15-24. pera, F. P. and DeWitt, D.th M. Oct., 1977, One-dimensional drift-flux model and cons Laboratory. 186

PAGE 187

Ishii, M., De Jarlais, G. 1986, Flow regime transition and interfacial characteristics of inverted annular flow. Nuclear Engineering and Design 95, 171-184. Ishii, M., Denten, J. P. 1990, Two-phase flow characteristics of inverted bubbly, slug and annular Iverson, E. B., Carpenter, J. M. May, 2003, Kinetics of irradiated liquid hydrogen. 16th Meeting Kandlikar, S. G. Feb., 1990, A general correlation for saturated two-phase flow boiling heat Kasai, Hideaki, Dino, Wilson Agerico, Muhida, Rifka 2003, Surface science-based reaction Kays, W. M. and Crawford, M. E., 1980, Convective heat and mass transfer, 2nd edition, Klausner, J. F., Chao, B. T., Soo, S. L., 1990, An improved method for simultaneous determination of frictional pressure drop and vapor volume fraction in vertical flow Kozlov, S. M., Nozdrin, S. V. 1992, Heat transfer and boundaries of its regimes during hydrogen Laverty, William F., Rohsenow, Warren M. Sept., 1964, Film boiling of saturated liquid flowing MA. Laverhsenow, W. M. 1967, Film boiling of saturated nitrogen flowing in a vertical tube. Journal of Heat Transfer 89, 90-98. Lee, Keat en ewis Research Center NASA, Cleveland, Ohio. Liao, Jun, 2005, Modeling two-phase transport during cryogenic chilldown in a pipeline, Ph.D. dissertation, University of Florida, Dept. of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering. Lockhmponent flow in pipes. Chemical Engineering Progress 45 (1), 39-48. e. ASME Transactions 66, 139-151. flow in post-critical heat flux region. Nuclear Engineering and Design 121, 349-366. of the International Collaboration on Advanced Neutron Sources. transfer inside horizontal and vertical tubes. Journal of Heat Transfer 112, 219-228. design: increasing the ortho-para hydrogen conversion yield via molecular orientation, a case study. Progress in Surface Science 72, 53-86. McGraw-Hill, New York. boiling. Experimental Thermal Fluid Science, 3, 404-415. boiling at different metallic surfaces. Cryogenics 32 ICEC supplement, 245-248. upward through a heat tube: high vapor quality range. MIT report 985732 Cambridgety, W. F., Ro ., Ryley, D. J., 1968, Evaporation of water droplets in superheated steam, Journal of HTransfer, 90, 445-451. Lewis, J. P., Goodykoontz, J. H., Kline, J. F. Sept., 1962, Boiling heat transfer to liquid hydrogand nitrogen in forced flow. NASA TN D-1314, L art, R. W., Martinelli, R. C. Jan, 1949, Proposed correlation of data for isothermal two-phase, two-co Martinelli, R. C., Boelter, L. M. K., Taylor, T. H. M., Thomsen, E. G., Feb., 1944, Isothermal pressure drop for two-phase two-component flow in a horizontal pip 187

PAGE 188

Martinelli, R. C., Nelson, D. B. 1948, Prediction of pressure drop during forced-circulation boiling of water. ASME Transactions 70, 695-702. Martinelli, R. C., Putnam, J. A., Lockhart, R. W. 1946, Two-phase, two-component flow in the viscous region. Transactions of the American Institute of Chemical Engineers 42, 681 -705. r Nusselt, W., 1916, Die Oberflchenkondensation des Wasserdampfes. Zeitschr. Ver. deutsch. Obot, N. T., Ishii, M. 1988, Two-phase flow regime transition criteria in post-dryout region Transfer Ottosen, Per July, 1980, An experimental and theoretical investigation of inverse annular film (4), 362-370. Prem empirical correlation for evaluating two-phase mixture density under adiabatic conditions, paper B9, European Two Phase Flow Group Ptushinskii, Yu. G. Jan., 2004, Low temperature adsorption of gases on metal surfaces (review). Rigot, G., 1973, Fluid capacity of an evaporator in direct expansion. ORNL-tr-5217, Oak Ridge, TN. Rogeering 9, 311-315. RogeCryogenic Engineering 13, 223-231. Roged the critical pressure. AIChE Journal 14 (6), 895-902. Milenko, Yu. Ya., Sibileva, R. M. 1997, Natural ortho-para conversion rate in liquid and gaseous hydrogen. Journal of Low Temperature Physics 107 (12), 77-92. Natterer, Johannes, Bargon, Joachin 1997, Parahydrogen induced polarization. Progress in Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy 31, 293-315. Nijhawan, S., Chen, J. C., Sundaram, R. K., London, E. J. Aug., 1980, Measurement of vaposuperheat in post-critical heat flux boiling. Journal of Heat Transfer 102, 465-470. Ing., 60, 541-569. based on flow visualization experiments. International Journal of Heat and Mass31 (12), 2559-2570. flow and dispersed droplet flow, important under LOCA conditions. RISOR424 DK 4000, Roskilde, Denmark Riso National Laboratory. Papadimitriou, P., Skorek, T. 1992, One-dimensional thermohydraulic code theseus and its application to chilldown process simulation in two-phase hydrogen flows. Cryogenics 32 oli, A. Franceso, D. Di., Prina, A., 1970, An Meeting, Milan, Italy. Low Temperature Physics 30 (1), 1-26. rs, J. D. 1963, Two-phase parahydrogen friction factor. Advances in Cryogenic Engine rs, J. D. 1967, Oscillations in flowing and heated subcritical hydrogen. Advances in rs, John D. Nov., 1968, Two phase friction factor for para-hydrogen between one atmosphere an 188

PAGE 189

Rohsenow, W. M., Webber, J. H., Ling, A. T., 1956, Transactions of the American Society oMechanical Engineers, 78, 1637. f Shah, M. M. May 1984, Prediction of heat transfer during boiling of cryogenic fluids flowing in Sherley, J. E. 1962, Nucleate boiling heat transfer data for liquid hydrogen at standard and zero Smith, S. L., 1969, Void fractions in two-phase flow. a correlation based on an equal velocity Sparrow, E. M. 1964, The effect of radiation on film boiling heat transfer. International Journal Takenaka, N., Akagawa, K., Fujii, T., Nishida, K. 1990, Experimental study on flow pattern and heat transfer of inverted annular flow. Nuclear Engineering and Design 120, 293-300. Takenf Multiphase Flow 15 (5), 767-785. Wallis, Graham B. 1969, One-dimensional two-phase flow, McGraw-Hill, New York. Waltetests with liquid hydrogen, Advances in Cryogenic Engineering 6, 509-516. WADC TR 59423, Wright Air Development Center. of minimum entropy production. Journal of Heat Transfer, Series C, 86, 247-252. Schrock, V. E., Grossman, L. M. 1959, Forced convection boiling studies, Univ. of California, Inst. Of Engineering Research, Report No. 73308-UCX-2182, Berkeley, California Scott, R. B., Cryogenic Engineering, Met-Chem Research, Boulder, CO, 1959. tubes. Cryogenics 24 (5), 231-236. gravity. Advances in Cryogenic Engineering 8, 495-500. head model. Proc. Inst. Mechanical Engineering, 184 (36), 647-664. of Heat and Mass Transfer 7 (2), 229-238. aka, N., Fujii, T., Akagawa, K., Nishida, K. 1989, Flow pattern transition and heat transfer of inverted annular flow. International Journal o Thom, J. R. S. 1964, Prediction of pressure drop during forced circulation boiling of water. International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer 7, 709-724. Wallis, Graham B. and Collier, John G., 1968, referenced in Collier and Thome, 2001, Convective boiling and condensation, 3rd ed., pg. 284, Oxford Science Publications, Oxford, England. rs, H. H. 1960, Single-tube heat transfer Wright, C. C., Walters, H. H. Aug., 1959, Single tube heat transfer tests, gaseous and liquid hydrogen. Zivi, S. M., May, 1964, Estimation of steady-state steam void-fraction by means of the principle Zuber, N., Findlay, J. A. Nov., 1965, Average volumetric concentration in two-phase flow systems. Journal of Heat Transfer 87, 453-468. 189

PAGE 190

BIOGRAPHICAL SKETCH James Pasch was born in Burlington, Iowa, in 1968, and spent most of the first 25 years of his lift the f Science degree enginositions at Sverdrup Technology Florida. e there. Three years were spent in Malawi, Africa, in the early 1970s, and 2 years a U. S. Coast Guard Academy between 1987 and 1989. He earned his Bachelor o in aerospace engineering from Iowa State University in 1993. His interest in nuclear propulsion drew him to the University of Florida in pursuit of a Master of Engineering degree in nuclear eering, completed in 1995. He has since had engineering p and Pratt & Whitney, and will be returning to Jacobs Sverdrup late 2006. Jim also has masters degrees in engineering management and mechanical engineering, both from the University of 190


Permanent Link: http://ufdc.ufl.edu/UFE0017524/00001

Material Information

Title: Pressure Drop and Heat Transfer in Inverted Film Boiling Hydrogen
Physical Description: Mixed Material
Copyright Date: 2008

Record Information

Source Institution: University of Florida
Holding Location: University of Florida
Rights Management: All rights reserved by the source institution and holding location.
System ID: UFE0017524:00001

Permanent Link: http://ufdc.ufl.edu/UFE0017524/00001

Material Information

Title: Pressure Drop and Heat Transfer in Inverted Film Boiling Hydrogen
Physical Description: Mixed Material
Copyright Date: 2008

Record Information

Source Institution: University of Florida
Holding Location: University of Florida
Rights Management: All rights reserved by the source institution and holding location.
System ID: UFE0017524:00001


This item has the following downloads:


Full Text





PRES SURE DROP AND HEAT TRANSFER INT INVERTED FILM BOILINTG HYDROGEN


By

JAMES PASCH























A DISSERTATION PRESENTED TO THE GRADUATE SCHOOL
OF THE UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT
OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF
DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY

UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA

2006

































Copyright 2006

by

James Pasch


































The effort put forth over the last four and a half years to complete this Ph.D. is dedicated to my
children, Nicholas and Connor. This is one component in my continuing efforts to be a good
father and role model for them. Life is much more interesting and rewarding when you remain
challenged.









ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

I would like to thank Dr. Samim Anghaie for agreeing to work with me on this effort that

started four and half years ago. I understand that working with a long-distance student is

difficult all the more reason I appreciate his patient support to achieve this goal. I thank my

wife, Melynda, who supported my efforts by giving me time to study. I express my gratitude for

having a great and supportive family; John and Alice Pasch, brother Jack, and sisters Alison and

Lorelei. I also express my gratitude to Robert Hendricks for giving freely of his memories of

these experiments in which he was centrally involved. His efforts, then and now, provide the

engineering community with unique information.












TABLE OF CONTENTS


page

ACKNOWLEDGMENT S ........._..... ...............4.._._. ......


LIST OF TABLES ........._..... ...............7..____ ......


LI ST OF FIGURE S .............. ...............8.....


AB S TRAC T ............._. .......... ..............._ 16...


Chapter

1 INTRODUCTION AND STATE OF THE ART ................ ...............18........... ..


Introducti on ................. ...............18.................
M otivation .............. ...............18....

Obj ectives ................. ...............19.......... .....
Pressure Drop............... ...............20..
Heat Transfer .............. ...............23....


2 MODELLING APPROACHES FOR TWO-PHASE FLOW .............. .....................3


Angular Simplifications ................. ...............38.................
Basic M odels .............. ...............38....
Flow Regime Analysis............... ...............40


3 TEST DATA DESCRIPTION AND EVALUATION AND MODEL DEVELOPMENT....44


Description of Experiments ............ ......_.. ...............44....
Experimental Setup .............. ...............44....
Experimental Conditions ....._.. ............... ......._.. ..........4
Heat Leaks ..... ._ ................ ......._.. ..........4
In strmentati on ................. ...............46........... ....
Data Validation ................. ............ ...............49.......

Comparison with Similar Data ................. ...............49................
End Effects ......... .. .. .................... ...............5

Hydrogen States: Parahydrogen and Orthohydrogen ........._.._.. ....._.._ ........._.....55
Model Development .............. ...............58....
Nature of Data .........._.... ........____ ...............60.....

Magnitude of Radiation Heating ........._._._. ....___ ...............63...
Conservation Equations ........._._.. ..... .___ ...............64.....
Entrance Lengths ........._._.. ..... .___ ...............66.....
Boundary Conditions............... ...............6
Closure Conditions .............. ...............70....

Vapor super heat............... ...............7
Liquid energy fl ow ........._... ...... ..... ...............7 1...












W all friction .............. ...............74....
Model Implementation .............. ...............75....


4 ANALYSIS AND VALIDATION OF MOMENTUM MODEL RESULTS ........................90


Data Referencing .............. ...............90....
Data Refinement ................. ...............90.................
Om itted Data .............. ...............90....
Problematic Data .............. ...............90....
Data Representation............... .............9
Problematic Runs............... ...............93..

Vapor Super heat ................. ...............95.......... .....
M odel Results ................. ........... ...............96......
Validation of Model Results ................. ...............97................

Range of Validity ................. ...............98........... ....

5 EVALUATION AND CORRELATION OF DATA AND CORRELATION
AS SES SSMENT ................. ...............106................


Data Correlation................. .............10

Low Pressure Slip Correlation ................. ........... ...............111 ....
Low Pressure Slip Correlation Assessment ................. ...............113........... ...

High Pressure Slip Correlation ................. .......... ...............115.....
High Pressure Slip Correlation Assessment ................. ......... ......... ............1
Accuracy of the Slip Correlations............... .............11
Validation of the Slip Correlations ................. ...............118........... ...
Observations ................. ...............119......... ......


6 HEAT TRANSFER ANALYSIS .............. ...............168....


Data Omission ................. ...............168.
The Nature of IFB Heat Transfer ................. ...............168..............
The General HTC Profile .................. .. ........ ......... .........16
An Interpretation of Controlling Effects in IFB Heat Transfer ................. .................1 70
Assessment of Various Models ................ .......................... ....................172


7 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS ................ ...............................180


General Conclusions ................. .. .......... ............. ............18
Pressure Drop Conclusions and Recommendations ................ .......... ...............181
Heat Transfer Conclusions and Recommendations............... ............18
Recommendations for Future Efforts .............. ...............182....


LIST OF REFERENCES ................. ...............184................


BIOGRAPHICAL SKETCH ................. ...............190......... ......










LIST OF TABLES


Table page
3-1. Table of experimental conditions. ............. ...............77.....

3-2. Comparison of Core et al. and Hendricks et al. heat transfer coefficients ............................78

3-3. Comparison of heat transfer coefficients for Wright and Walters data and TN 765.............79

3-4. Summary of test conditions for maj or hydrogen heat transfer studies ................ ...............79

3-5. Result of parametric sensitivity study of end axial heat conduction. ................ ............... ..79

3-6. Tube wall axial heat transfer analysis............... ...............79

4-1. List of tube numbers, dimensions, and runs executed with the tubes. ................ ...............99

4-2. Statistical analysis of pressure data ................ ...............100..............

5-1. Accuracies of some common slip correlations. .............. ...............121....

5-2. Comparison of pressure drop prediction accuracies ................. .............................122

6-1. Comparison of predictive accuracy of various IFB models. ............. ......................7











LIST OF FIGURES


Figure page

2-1. Various flow regimes for IFB. ............ ...... ._ ...............43

2-2. Flow regime map generated by Takenaka for IFB (1989). ............. .....................4

3-1. TN 765 experimental setup............... ...............80.

3-2. TN 3095 experimental setup............... ...............81.

3-3. 1961 data test section. .............. ...............82....

3-4. TN 3095 test section ................. ...............83........... ..

3-5. TN 3095 instrumentation. .............. ...............84....

3-6. Nodal distribution and heat generation distribution used to model end effects ....................85

3-7. Radial metal temperature profiles as a function of metal thermal conductivity...................85

3-8. Radial metal temperature profiles as a function of metal thickness. .............. ................86

3-9. Effect of specified parameters on tube end wall axial heat transfer. .................. ...............86

3-10. Difference in wall to liquid temperature for all data considered .................... ...............8

3-11. Wall to liquid hydrogen temperature differences for four runs ................. ..........___.....87

3-12. Theoretical liquid core temperature profile at the exit of the heated test section. ...............88

3-13. Flow diagram for momentum and energy analysis of data. ............. ......................8

4-1. Sample of 1961 data wall temperatures............... .............10

4-2. Tube 3 exhibits a consistent reduction in wall temperature at 34 cm................. ...............101

4-3. Comparison of runs 7 and 8 pressure profiles .....__.....___ ..........__ ........10

4-4. Run 14 energy and momentum balances .....__.....___ ..........._ ...........0

4-5. Results of modifying the coefficient in Burmeister' s equation............. .. .........___....103

4-6. Culled data momentum and energy balance results from model............. ... .........___...103

4-7. Calculated void fraction from model for the culled data set. ............. .....................10

4-8. Velocity slip ratio vs quality from model for the culled data set. ................... ...............10











4-9. Void fraction vs. equilibrium quality for three runs of Ottosen' s experiments ................... 105

5-1. Vapor velocity vs. superficial velocity. ............. ...............122....

5-2. Comparison of model slip and slip predicted from correlations. ............. .....................12

5-3. Predicted versus measured pressure gradients for all data used in correlating slip.............123

5-4. Model and prediction results for run 1. ............. .....................124

5-5. Model and prediction results for run 2. ............. ...............125....

5-6. Model and prediction results for run 3. ................ ....__ ....__ ........__.........126

5-7. Model and prediction results for run 4. ............. ...............127....

5-8. Model and prediction results for run 5. ............. ...............128....

5-9. Model and prediction results for run 6. ............. ...............129....

5-10. Model and prediction results for run 7. ............. ...............130....

5-11. Model and prediction results for run 9. ............. .....................131

5-12. Model and prediction results for run 10. ............. ...............132....

5-13. Model and prediction results for run 11. ............. .....................133

5-14. Model and prediction results for run 12. ............. ...............134....

5-15. Model and prediction results for run 13. ............. ...............135....

5-16. Model and prediction results for run 15. ............. ...............136....

5-17. Model and prediction results for run 16. ............. ...............137....

5-18. Model and prediction results for run 17. ............. ...............138....

5-19. Model and prediction results for run 18. ............. ...............139....

5-20. Model and prediction results for run 19. ............. ...............140....

5-21. Model and prediction results for run 20. ............. ...............141....

5-22. Model and prediction results for run 21. ............. ...............142....

5-23. Model and prediction results for run 33 .......__......_.__.... ...._.. ......._.._.......143

5-24. Model and prediction results for run 34. ............. ...............144....











5-25. Model and prediction results for run 35. ............. ...............145....

5-26. Model and prediction results for run 37. ............. ...............146....

5-27. Model and prediction results for run 38. ............. ...............147....

5-28. Model and prediction results for run 39. ............. ...............148....

5-29. Model and prediction results for run 40. ............. ...............149....

5-30. Model and prediction results for run 41. ............. ...............150....

5-31. Model and prediction results for run 42. ............. .....................151

5-32. Model and prediction results for run 43 ........_......_._._... .....___......_.........152

5-33. Model and prediction results for run 45. ............. ...............153....

5-34. Model and prediction results for run 46. ............. ...............154....

5-35. Model and prediction results for run 47. ............. ...............155....

5-36. Model and prediction results for run 48. ............. ...............156....

5-37. Model and prediction results for run 49. ............. ...............157....

5-38. Model and prediction results for run 50. ............. ...............158....

5-39. Model and prediction results for run 51. ............. .....................159

5-40. Model and prediction results for run 23 ........_......_._._... .....___......_.........160

5-41. Model and prediction results for run 24. ............. ...............161....

5-42. Model and prediction results for run 25. ............. ...............162....

5-43. Model and prediction results for run 27. ........._. ...... .___ .....___......_.........163

5-44. Model and prediction results for run 32. ............. ...............164....

5-45. Model and prediction results for run 36. ............. ...............165....

5-46. Model and prediction results for run 44. ............. ...............166....

5-47. Model and prediction results for run 8. ............. ...............167....

6-1. Variation of the HTC as a function of quality in IFB flow. ............_. .. ...___............176

6-2. Variation of HTC versus equilibrium quality in the IAFB flow regime. ............................177










6-3. Variation of HTC versus mass quality for runs 39-42. ................ ............................177

6-4. Variation of HTC versus mass quality for runs 44-47............... ...............178.

6-5. Variation of Dittus-Boelter vapor properties with pressure and temperature. ....................178

6-6. Comparison of predicted HTC using the TN 3095 correlation with the experimental .......179

6-7. Comparison of predicted HTC using the modified equilibrium bulk Dittus-Boelter. .........179













NOMENCLATURE


A area

AIAFB agitated inverted annular film boiling

As surface area

b y-intercept of line

Bo boiling number

C conversion constants for ortho-para conversion

CHF critical heat flux

Co Colburn number

Co drift flux model distribution parameter

cp specific heat at constant pressure

cy specific heat at constant density

D diameter

DFB dispersed film boiling

f friction factor

F Chen's enhancement factor

fi low pressure slip correlating parameter

f2 high pressure slip correlating parameter

Fr Froude number

G mass flux

Go reference mass flux

Gr Grasshof number










g gravity

h mass-specific enthalpy

h, or HTC heat transfer coefficient

IAFB inverted annular film boiling

IFB inverted film boiling

ISFB inverted slug film boiling

j superficial velocity

k thermal conductivity

K conversion factor for ortho-para conversion

L length

LOCA loss of coolant accident

m slope of line

n number density

Nu Nusselt number

p pressure

Pr Prandtl number

q" heat flux

qo" reference heat flux

Q heat flow rate

r radial direction, radial distance

Re Reynolds number

s velocity slip

S Chen's suppression factor










time

temperature

velocity

mass flow rate

mass quality

equilibrium quality

elevation


Greek symbols

oc void fraction

P volumetric quality

AT temperature differential

X Lockheed-Martinelli parameter

4 friction multiplier

C1 viscosity

p density

a surface tension, Stefan-Boltzmann constant

z shear stress

u specific volume



Sub scripts

av average

b bulk










c cross section

calc calculated

CL centerline

crit critical condition

exp experimental

f film conditions

h hydraulic

i inlet, interface

mnt y-intercept

I liquid phase

10 all fluid flowing as liquid

m mean conditions

mac macroscopic, in Chen's correlation

mic microscopic, in Chen's correlation

o orthohydrogen

p parahydrogen

rad radiation

s saturated conditions

slope slope

tt turbulent-turbulent liquid-vapor phases

TP two-phase

v vapor phase

w wall









Abstract of Dissertation Presented to the Graduate School
of the University of Florida in Partial Fulfillment of the
Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy

PRES SURE DROP AND HEAT TRANSFER INT INVERTED FILM BOILINTG HYDROGEN

By

James Pasch

December 2006

Chair: Samim Anghaie
Major: Nuclear Engineering Sciences

Two-phase boiling hydrogen pressure drop and heat transfer is studied in the context of

high velocity upflow in a constant, high heat flux, steady state, internal pipe flow environment.

These data were generated by NASA in the early and mid 1960s in support of the manned space

flight programs. Measurements taken were local pressure, temperature, and voltage drop.

System measurements included mass flow rate, and test section inlet and discharge pressure and

temperature.

This effort establishes the nature of the flow as inverted film boiling, which has been

studied to some degree. In this structure, the wall temperatures are too hot to allow liquid to

remain at the surface. Therefore, a vapor film is established at the wall throughout the flow. The

approach of this analysis is to reverse-engineer the data to determine mass quality, void fraction,

and velocity slip. This is accomplished by applying a one-dimensional, fiye-equation model,

with pressure gradient being the one combined equation for the liquid and vapor phases. Other

maj or assumptions are that all of the vapor is at the mean film temperature, and the liquid core

experiences no sensible heating.

The resulting velocity slips are correlated for high and low pressure conditions, with the

cutoff established at 600 kPa. Good agreement is achieved between the pressures predicted










using the slip correlations and the measured pressures. Results are in general significantly better

than those from the homogeneous equilibrium model.

Various established heat transfer coefficient models are also applied to these data. It is

shown that pre-critical heat flux models fail absolutely to predict the heat transfer coefficient. It

is further shown that film boiling models that focus on buoyancy fail as well. While all forced

convection film boiling models are within a reasonable range of the data, recommendations for

appropriate models are made.

The range of pipe inlet conditions are 188 kPa to 1265 kPa, mass fluxes from 327 kg/m2-S

to 3444 kg/m2-S, and heat fluxes from 294 kW/m2 to 2093 kW/m2. Two heated test section

lengths are 30.5 cm. and 61.0 cm. long, and five different diameters range from 0.48 cm. to 1.29

cm.









CHAPTER 1
INTRODUCTION AND STATE OF THE ART

Introduction

This dissertation investigates the state of understanding of and prediction capabilities for

boiling hydrogen, and the needs for improving the current condition. It presents an engineering-

based approach to improve on the prediction capabilities for pressure drop and heat transfer.

Motivation

Accurate predictions of pressure drop in and heat transfer from a pipe to hydrogen during

forced convective two-phase flow benefit engineers throughout the life of a product. During the

design phase, good pressure drop and heat transfer models will help the engineer reduce the

uncertainty in the design parameters. During the product test and development phase, good

models will help the engineer to correctly interpret test data, therefore allowing him to determine

where modifications are necessary. During the use of the product, problems inevitably arise that

require the engineer to search for the root cause. This investigation requires a good

understanding of how the product will react under off-nominal operating conditions. Accurate,

mechanistic models allow the engineer to perform this investigation with confidence that the

thermal-hydraulics related results of the investigation are valid.

The rocket industry uses liquid hydrogen as a fuel. Heat transfer to two-phase flowing

hydrogen routinely occurs during three phases of rocket operation; fuel tanking, rocket engine

conditioning, and possibly during rocket firing. Nuclear Thermal Propulsion (NTP) systems are

powered by high temperature nuclear reactors that are used to heat up hydrogen propellant to

temperatures in excess of 3,000 K. Hydrogen is the only viable propellant for the NTP systems

because of its low molecular weight that generates the highest specific impulse (Isp) at the

maximum operating temperatures of these reactors. Hydrogen is pumped at cryogenic










temperatures and relatively high pressures to cool the rocket nozzle before entering the reactor

core. Heat removal in the rocket nozzle and reactor core areas transform subcooled liquid

hydrogen to superheated hydrogen gas. The evolution of hydrogen flow in the system involves

two-phase flow and heat transfer under subcooled, saturated, and superheated thermodynamic

conditions. In addition to the rockets, a nascent industry that may require modeling of this sort is

the hydrogen-fueled car industry.

Objectives

This research effort includes a number of obj ectives. First, it is necessary to conduct a

literature search to determine the best battery of two-phase hydrogen tests to analyze. Using the

data from this test series, the next obj ective is to evaluate the quality of these data. The primary

obj ective is to improve the accuracy of predicted pressure drop of and heat transfer to two-phase

hydrogen in a forced convection, highly heated, internal pipe flow environment.

Mechani stically-based models are preferred, but correlations that provide improvements to

pressure drop and heat transfer predictions are considered acceptable. Since very high wall to

bulk temperature ratios can reasonably be expected with liquid hydrogen flowing in a heated

pipe, the effect of radial temperature variation will necessarily be included. This goal will

include the generation of void fraction, quality, and slip information that must be evaluated

against data. It is an obj ective to develop a predictive model for one or more of these parameters

so the pressure drop can be predicted. An important criterion of success is to reproduce the

pressure drop data with minimal error using the predictive model.

Additionally, it is an obj ective to either improve on the accuracy of current heat transfer

models, or at least review the current understanding of this subj ect and recommend models to use

for two-phase hydrogen.









Pressure Drop

Pressure change for a vaporizing fluid is comprised of three contributing effects:

momentum decrease due to increasing fluid velocity as it vaporizes, friction between the fluid

and the wall, and pressure change due to a change in height of the fluid. From Collier (1981),

these three terms for a homogeneous flow are


a -G (1.1)


F (1.2)



: = -p (1.3)

In these equations, p is pressure, a refers to acceleration, F refers to friction, z refers to

elevation, G is mass flux, u is velocity, frP is the two-phase friction factor, p is density, D is tube

diameter, and g is gravity. The frictional term is often determined by calculating what the

frictional loss would be if the entire flow were liquid, then applying a two-phase frictional

multiplier. This method was developed by Lockhart, Martinelli, Nelson, and others at the

University of California in the 1940's (Martinelli et al., 1944, 1946; Martinelli and Nelson, 1948;

Lockhart and Martinelli, 1949). The form of their equation is


F F ;(1.4)


The two-phase frictional multiplier, $102, iS modeled as a function of flow quality and system

pressure. Determining this multiplier is the goal of much research, particularly since the research

of Martinelli and coworkers was limited to atmospheric pressure.










The frictional multiplier can take four different forms. Two of them develop from using

only the liquid or vapor mass that is present in the flow and are represented by a single letter

subscript "l" or "v" to indicate liquid or vapor. The other two develop from using the entire flow

as either liquid or vapor, and have a two-letter subscript "lo" or "vo" to signify that the entire

flow is liquid or vapor. Traditionally, liquid conditions are used in evaporating systems, and

vapor conditions are used for condensing systems. Relations can be developed between these

various frictional multipliers.

A correlating parameter developed by Martinelli and his coworkers is Xut, which they

determined to have the following form


X,, =1- x p'(1.5)


In this equation, x is quality and C1 is viscosity. The sub scripts 1 and v refer to liquid and vapor

phases, respectively. This parameter, in various similar forms, has been used to evaluate the

frictional multipliers. The exact forms of the frictional multiplier models depend on the nature of

the flow of the liquid and vapor phases turbulent or laminar. Thus, there are four combinations

of turbulent/laminar flows.

The currently preferred model for predicting the frictional multiplier was developed by

Chisholm (1973). His model uses a property index, composed of the property terms in equation

(1.5) above without the quality term. Mass flux is also a factor in his model.





B is a function of the saturated liquid and vapor densities and the flow regime combination of the

two phases (i.e., turbulent-turbulent, turbulent-laminar, laminar-turbulent, or laminar-laminar),

and x is quality.









Hendricks et al. (1961) derived a version of Xut for the peculiar case of inverted annular

flow. The primary difference in the derivation is the position of the phases in the flow.

Martinelli et al. (1944) assumed that liquid was adj acent to the wall and vapor was at the tube

core, or that the flow is homogeneous. For convective hydrogen, the flow is usually better

described as separated and the phase adj acent to the wall is vapor, not liquid. However,

Hendricks et al. (1961) determined that the correlating parameter, presented in equation (1.5),

was the same in both cases.

Papadimitriou and Skorek (1991) processed data from two of Hendricks' tests with their

one-dimensional thermohydraulic model THESEUS. They observed that the pressure drop due

to viscous shear forces is about 100 times smaller than that caused by momentum change. The

Chisholm (1973) method was used to model the two-phase friction multiplier.

John Rogers at Los Alamos Laboratories contributed significantly to the understanding of

parahydrogen flow friction characteristics in the 1960's (1963, 1968). His efforts included

extending Martinelli's friction multiplier quantification work beyond one atmosphere. His

results were based upon theoretically determining the values of vapor void fraction and its

derivative with respect to pressure at one atmosphere and at the critical point pressure with

quality as a parameter, then interpolating the curves of void fraction verses pressure between

these boundaries for the specified qualities. The empirical equation he developed for turbulent-

turbulent flow as a result of his work is

2 1+ 8 8187 0.1324Gpent p)+ 0.03966(p cnt -P)3 1.7



where

E = 1.896x 2. 646x2 +1.695x3 (1.8)









In this equation, the subscript crit refers to the critical condition. Note that pressure is in

atmospheres, x is quality, and the correlation gives the multiplier for the pressure drop for the

liquid only in the tube, not for all the flow considered as liquid. Comparison of predicted versus

experimental pressure drop with one set of parahydrogen data at various pressures indicated

good agreement, with the error generally smaller at lower system pressures.

More recent work on separated two-phase flow pressure drop and heat transfer with vapor

core was performed by Fu and Klausner (1997). In their work, conservation of mass,

momentum, and energy laws are applied with closure relationships for vapor-liquid interface

friction, liquid film turbulent viscosity, turbulent Prandtl number, and liquid droplet entrainment

rate. Their results compared with 12 data sets of upflow and downflow were good. Although

this theory assumes a liquid film and vapor core, the general procedure may prove useful with

inverted annular flow after making the appropriate modifications to the various correlations.

Heat Transfer

John Chen published a correlation in 1966 that was based on the superposition of heat

transfer caused by forced convective flow and by bubble generation. These terms are referenced

with subscripts mac and mic for macroscopic and microscopic effects.

h = h,,, + h,,, (1.9)

where

h,,, = hF(g,,) (1.10)


h...._2 0 01i5k O079IU 9 045hl 04P49P 2
her = .012 51 2p 02 02 T Ts 024 IP,(T,)-g oyS(F, Ret) (1.11)


hi is the heat transfer coefficient associated with single phase liquid flowing alone in the pipe. In

this equation, k is thermal conductivity, c, is specific heat, o is the surface tension, hiv is the heat









of vaporization, T is the temperature, S is a boiling suppression terms, F is an enhancement term,

and Re is the Reynolds number. The sub scripts w and s refer to wall and saturation conditions.


hIOIZ = 0.02 ePl0 4 k;` (1.12)



Rez (1 ) (1.13)


In the above equation, Pr is the Prandtl number. The model incorporated heat transfer data from

water, methane, pentane, and cyclohexane in the form of two factors, F and S, that were applied

to the two different heat transfer components. His model proved to be very successful.

Modifications to the original model have been proposed. Collier provided curve fits for the

factors F and S as a function of Xtt.

Shah (1984) developed a correlation for saturated flow boiling for both vertical and

horizontal tubes as a function of the Colburn, boiling, and Froude numbers, represented as Co,

Bo, and Fr.

h = hzf (Co, Bo, Frze ) (1. 14)

where


C=1x p (1.15)


Bo = (1.16)
Ghiv

G2
Frze =~ (1.17)


In the above equations, q" is the heat flux.









Schrock and Grossman (1959) reviewed vertical, upward flowing boiling heat transfer data

for water with the following result;


h = hC,I Bo+C2 1 06 (1.18)


where C1 and C2 are COnstants with values of 7390 and 0.00015, respectively.

Gungor and Winterton (1986, 1987) developed the following for vertical, convective flow

boiling;

S0 75 041 I(.9
h,,ea = hi 1+ 3000Bo0 86 1(.9


Bj orge, Hall, and Rohsenow (1982) developed a correlation for vertical, internal, upward

forced flow boiling for qualities above 0.05. Note that this correlation is a superposition of heat

fluxes as opposed to Chen's superposition of heat transfer coefficients.


h = fr'(1.20)



qto = 4f rc 4fa 1- (1.21)



qj, = F, Pr; T, T (1.22)


1 2
F, = 015 -+032 (.3
Xtt Xtt (.3

C2 = f (Prt, Rel) (1.24)


q,= u#hi / 9,1,:p';,'~/8(~ 5/8j 1/ (1.25)
a #lh:h! Pt Pv)9i a :T::










(TK T,)1 = Th, U1) (1.26)


In the above equation, u is the specific volume.

Kandlikar (1990) developed the correlation below for vertical and horizontal flow boiling

heat transfer in tubes;

h,,,a = h, CICoc"(25Frzec+ +CzRoc F, (1.27)

where the constants C1 through Cs can each take on two different values depending on the

Colburn number. The value of the constant FK depends upon the fluid being modeled.

Hendricks et al. (1961) performed experiments with hydrogen flowing inside a highly

heated tube. Nusselt numbers were determined from measurements. The deviation from these

measurements that the calculated Nusselt numbers generate approaches 80% at large values of

Martinelli parameters, and roughly 40% at low values. As a result, the researchers found it

necessary to curve fit the Nusselt number ratio as a function of the Martinelli parameter. This

technique significantly improved the predictive accuracy, with most experimental Nusselt

numbers lying within +15% of the curve fit.

The model for the Nusselt number, Nu, that Hendricks et al. published for their forced

convective heat transfer for flowing hydrogen was as follows:


Mr ic 'c~ (1.28)
exf 0.611 +1.93X,,

where

Miat = 0.023 Reo.s Pr0.4 (1.29)

and










Re = p ,aD(1.30)



Pr,,, = ?r lx(1.31)



The result of this method can be seen in Figure 1-1.

Hendricks et al. (1966) developed a similar equation to correlate the combined subcritical

data from TN 3095 (1966) and TN 765 with somewhat worse results due to data scatter. It is

critical to note that this correlation excludes those data for which the thermodynamic equilibrium

quality indicates subcooled flow. This excludes possibly up to one-third of the 612 points in the

data set! The authors remarked that this equation should describe subcritical convective fi1m-

boiling data up to pressures near the critical pressure when non-equilibrium characteristics are

small. The correlation based on the remaining data is

Mt 1
exp, f + .5(1.32)
Miat, ,,,, 0.7 + 2.4Xr,x,

In this equation, subscript f refers to properties evaluated at the average of wall and bulk

temperatures. Sub script fm refers to mean film conditions, e.g., using the density defined above

with subscript f~m.

These authors also developed a correlation based on a pseudo quality with similar results in

accuracy. This correlation included some of the subcooled data, but far from all of it. Their

assessment of this correlation was that it covered the liquid-hydrogen data for convective fi1m

boiling from a slightly subcooled state through two-phase and well into the superheat region.

It should be noted that all models presented above perform very poorly on the data

addressed in this dissertation. The exceptions, of course, are the models from TN 765 and TN










3095. Chen' s (1966) model performed the best of all the others, while those of Shah (1984),

Schrock and Grossman (1959), and Gungor and Winterton (1986, 1987) predict convection

coefficients that are hundreds of times too high. This is due in large part to the form of the

Reynolds number used by Hendricks et al.

Heat transfer coefficient models have been developed that focus specifically on the flow

structure of the data in this dissertation inverted film boiling (IFB). In general, the forms fall

into two categories: those that attempt to capture the heat transfer mechanics of a highly

convective flow, and those that focus on the effects of buoyancy. The convective models

generally expand on the basic Dittus-Boelter model, while the buoyancy models usually take the

form of the Bromley model (1950), which was developed for laminar film boiling, and is

analogous to film condensation theory. These low velocity models are generally used to model

Loss Of Coolant Accidents (LOCA' s) in the nuclear industry.

Bromley's model (1950) is an extension of theory developed by Nusselt (1916) for laminar

film condensation on a horizontal tube. His heat transfer coefficient model for laminar film

boiling from a horizontal tube is


h=g 0.6 (1.33)



where hfg' is the effective latent heat of vaporization accounting or vapor superheat. Numerous

film boiling models expand on this basic form.

Bromley et al. (1953) extended his own model to include forced convection. For low

velocity flows, he determined the following:


hg g 0.6 (1.34)
co= DpD~, ATk









where the subscript 'co' refers to convection only excluding radiation heat transfer. AT refers

to the temperature delta between the wall and the centerline. For higher velocity flows, he

proposed the following;


h = 2.~IkPhf1 (1.35)


Here, the enthalpy of vaporization is defined as


h = hg 1+ h '8T (1.36)


Berenson (1961) modified the Bromley model by incorporating the hydrodynamic

instabilities predicted by Taylor instability theory. He published the following result;



h = 0.425~~T [5 2p~:j (1.37)



The vapor properties are evaluated at the mean film temperature, liquid properties at saturation

temperature, and 0.425 is used as a coefficient instead of the 0.62 in equation 1.34 above to

account for enthalpy of vaporization to superheated conditions.

The analogy to liquid film condensation has been extended to the assumption of turbulent

flow in the vapor film. Wallis and Collier (1968) presented conclusions from this theory and

offered


=() 0.056ReU [Pr Grr *]i (1 .38)
k

where the modified Grasshoff number is defined as


Gr* = : p (1.39)
I#g









An obvious characteristic of the heat transfer coefficient models presented thus far is their

inclusion of buoyancy effects. The models that focus on highly convective flows ignore

buoyancy effects. In these models, heat transfer is quantified within the framework of the

traditional Dittus-Boelter forced convection concept.

Dougall and Rohsenow (1963) developed the following model for dispersed flow and

inverted annular film boiling (IAFB) of Freon 1 13:


h = 0.023 ""Reo Pr~O4 (1.40)
Dh

where


w x w (1 -x)P

Re, = p,~,Dh (1.41)

The velocity term applied here is the throughput velocity. This effort focused on low quality

mass flows. In this equation, w is the mass flow rate, and the subscript s refers to saturation.

A subsequent research program that focused on higher mass qualities was completed by

Laverty and Rohsenow (1964, 1967). Their IFB nitrogen studies included visual analysis of the

flow structure. Through theory, they determined that a significant amount of superheat was

present in the vapor. As a result, they determined that it is impossible to obtain a simple

expression for the overall heat transfer coefficient, although they did present a model for their

data, presented below. Instead, they presented arguments based on the Dittus-Boelter model to

set the upper bound and approximate value of the heat transfer coefficient. Their published

model is as follows:


h = 0.023 pv bD jPr04 kv (1.42









In this equation, the sub script b refers to bulk conditions.

Forslund and Rohsenow (1968) also used nitrogen to improve the analysis of Laverty and

Rohsenow (1964). Improvements focused on droplet breakup due to vapor acceleration,

modified drag coefficients on accelerating droplets, and a Leidenfrost heat transfer from the wall

to the droplets at lower qualities. Test conditions covered the quality range from saturation at the

inlet to 35% to 315% at the exit. They focused on estimating the magnitude of departure from

thermal equilibrium and droplet size. They concluded that vapor superheating was significant -

up to 50% in vapor quality. The heat transfer model they proposed, presented below, attempted

to modify the Reynolds number to reflect conditions in the vapor:


h=~ l~ i 0.1 G r"x(1- x~"1P ', (1.43)


Kays (1980) presented an analysis for heat transfer between parallel plates. This model has

been used by Hammouda (1996, 1997) in his modeling of IFB nitrogen. The Kays model is

below. Note that the length dimension is the film thickness, 6.

5.071k
h= =r 03 + 0.0028 Pr o 645 Re-l (1.44)


Bailey (1972) presented a buoyancy-based heat transfer model as follows:


h = (1.45)
D= vk,3g, (T -T)( T,)hr ) 2

Takenaka at Kobe University in Japan is associated with a number of IFB studies from the

late 1980's and early 1990's. In general, his working fluids are R-113 and nitrogen flowing

upward inside a vertical heated tube. Heat fluxes and mass velocities are generally an order of

magnitude or more smaller than those addressed in this dissertation. His work is unique in that it









is the only research found in the literature search that produced a flow regime map for IFB.

Takenaka et al. (1989, 1990) found that heat transfer coefficients, as a function of equilibrium

quality, did not vary with heat flux or inlet subcooling, but segregated consistently with mass

flux. As a result, their IFB flow regime map uses mass flux and equilibrium quality as

coordinates. As equilibrium quality increased, higher mass fluxes produced higher heat transfer

coefficients at the same quality. They found that the Nusselt Number predicted using the

Dougall-Rohsenow (1963) model were reasonably close to their data. Takenaka also worked

with Fujii (Fujii et al. (2005)) to investigate pressure drop in IFB. Because the mass velocities

are very low, the pressure drops measured in the nitrogen flow are in general much smaller than

those exhibited in the data of this dissertation. They found that the pressure drop characteristics

correspond well with the heat transfer characteristic map.

Hammouda et al. (1996, 1997) investigated the effects of mass flux, inlet subcooling, and

system pressure on the heat transfer coefficient using R-12, R-22, and R134a as the working

fluids. The characteristic shape of the heat transfer coefficient as a function of equilibrium

quality is consistent with those in Takenaka' s experiments. The effect of mass flux is the same,

but varying the inlet subcooling measurably segregated Hammouda' s data while Takenaka noted

no such influence. Different results are also noted in the effect of heat flux on the heat transfer

coefficient. While Hammouda' s data show that higher heat flux increases the heat transfer

coefficient, Takenaka' s data shows very little, if any, effect. Hammouda also observed that

higher system pressure increases the heat transfer coefficient a parametric effect that Takenaka

never investigated.

Ishii has been involved with a number of experiments that focused on the flow regime

characteristics and transition criteria of post-critical heat flux (IFB) flows. Ishii and De Jarlais









(1986) investigated the basic hydrodynamics of this flow regime. The mechanisms that

disintegrate the liquid core were investigated, as well as the formation and entrainment of

droplets in the vapor annulus. The experimental portion of this work involved adiabatic two-

phase flow, resulting in a flow regime transition criterion based on the Weber number. Ishii and

De Jarlais (1987) presented experimental data for an idealized IFB flow generated by inj ecting a

liquid inside a vapor annulus in up-flow using Freon 113. Fluid heating was incorporated into

the test setup. Visual observations revealed the nature of the flow structure to include smooth

IAFB, agitated inverted annular film boiling (AIAFB), followed by inverted slug film boiling

(ISFB) and dispersed film boiling (DFB). Obot and Ishii (1988) extended this work with the

same fluids and test setup. More extensive results of flow regime transition are presented. Ishii

and Denten (1990) continued this work to investigate the effects of bubbles present before post-

critical heat flux is attained on the IFB flow regimes and their transitions. Three regimes were

observed; rough wavy, agitated, and dispersed ligament-droplet. They found that the flow

pattern in IFB depends upon the nature of the pre-CHF flow. A general flow regime transition

criterion between the agitated and dispersed droplet regimes is given based on conditions at

dryout. This correlation includes void fraction at this point as an important parameter. Babelli et

al. (1994) used the same experimental apparatus to continue the research. He concluded that the

most significant flow regime is the agitated regime, since the large interfacial surface generated

in this regime probably correlates with high momentum and heat transfer. A correlation for the

axial extent of this flow regime was proposed, again dependent upon the void fraction at the

point that CHF occurs. It should be noted that all of the work performed by Ishii and his

associates was performed for the purpose of better understanding nuclear reactor LOCA. As

such, the flow velocities are quite low compared with the data in this dissertation.










Per Ottosen (1980) published the first known results from the use of y-ray absorption to

measure void fraction in low Reynolds number IFB nitrogen. He observed the transition from

IAFB to DFB at void fractions between 80-90%. These void fractions were typically attained by

the point at which equilibrium quality was 20%. Given that superheat will be present, this

equilibrium quality probably relates to a lower actual quality. Since his work was in support of

understanding LOCA' s and reflooding, his fluid velocities were low. Also, the work was

executed at a constant temperature condition instead of a constant heat flux condition, as is more

often the case. Nonetheless, trends in heat transfer coefficients as a function of mass flux are

evident.

Experiments using hydrogen as the working fluid are rare. This is primarily because of the

dangerous nature of the fluid. Hendricks (personal communication, 2005) relates that, in the

series of experiments during 1961 and 1966, the building in which they worked was evacuated of

people, and emergency personnel were notified of each experiment. It is determined through the

literature search that the only published hydrogen experiments performed in the United States

that present heat transfer data occurred in support of the manned space missions in the 1960's.

Published results from hydrogen experiments in the Soviet Union and Europe, though they likely

occurred, have not been found.

Core et al. (1959) performed experiments with hydrogen similar to those in TN 3095, but

with much fewer measuring points of pressure and temperature. Twenty-seven heat transfer tests

with liquid hydrogen were completed in the series. Since only test section inlet and exit

conditions were measured, the heat transfer coefficients calculated from these measured data are

overall average coefficients for the entire tube. The authors did not present a theoretical

correlation for the heat transfer coefficient. Their primary goal was to evaluate the utility of










hydrogen as a regenerative rocket nozzle coolant. Nonetheless, the data from this study may be

considered as complementary to the data of TN 3095, and therefore useful.

Wright and Walters (1959) found that stable film boiling of hydrogen could occur for wall

to bulk temperature differences as low as about 22 K to 28 K. Also, peak heat transfer

coefficients were about 10% of the magnitudes of those in nucleate boiling. Their film boiling

heat transfer coefficients were almost constant over the range of wall to bulk temperature

differences of 22 K to 167 K.

Papadimitriou (1991) presented results of a simulated rocket engine two-phase hydrogen

chilldown process using a modified form of Dougall and Rohsenow model in the computer

program THESEUS. The modification is a temperature correction,


(1.46)


applied as a multiplier on the model for the heat transfer coefficient. It was stated that this better

accounts for the real film conditions at high wall temperatures.

Many of the above forced convection models are based on the classic Dittus-Boelter model.

Variations on this standard model are implemented by using properties and flow conditions

calculated in specified ways. For example, the properties used in the Reynolds number could

represent bulk calculated values for the two phases, the vapor saturated condition, or superheated

vapor conditions. Below is the standard model for later reference:


h = (1.47)


In this model, the coefficient and exponents can be adjusted to fit the data. Common values are

0.023 for the coefficient and 0.8 and 0.4 for the exponents m and n. Unless stated otherwise,

these are the values used in this research effort.









The literature search has found a number of experiments that are peripherally related to the

data in the NASA data. However, the data addressed in this dissertation are rare or even unique

in several ways. First, the working fluid is hydrogen. As stated above, there are only three other

published reports of experiments with hydrogen in a convective, IFB condition. None of these

three experiments operated at the high mass flux levels of the NASA data. Finally, and most

importantly, the extent of measured parameters makes these data extremely valuable. These

measurements provide the means to theoretically analyze the pressure drop and heat transfer

characteristics of hydrogen, and to validate any proposed model or correlation.














-Nu
exp~f.1 061 e1.95 XH


-02 .04 .06i.08.1 .2 4 ,6 .8 I 2
MARTINELLI PARAMETER, Xal


Figure 1-1. Ratio of experimental to calculated Nusselt number for the 1961 data.


B
c-
ct
p:
u c""`
mr pi B
r
t
w
m
m
7:









CHAPTER 2
MODELLINTG APPROACHES FOR TWO-PHASE FLOW

Angular Simplifications

Two-phase fluid flowing in a pipe can have characteristics that vary in the axial, radial, and

azimuthal directions. Axial dependencies of properties and flow structure can result from

entrance effects, wall friction, turbulence, and heat addition. This dependency is typically not

ignored, since it is changes in conditions in the axial direction that interest engineers typically.

Radial dependencies can result from these same sources. Since it is a great simplification

to ignore this dependency, this is commonly done. Corrections can be applied to models that

explicitly ignore the radial dependency. For example, the effect of a radial temperature gradient

on fluid properties can be accounted for by multiplying the Dittus-Boelter Nusselt number by a

ratio of wall-to-centerline temperatures, usually raised to an exponent. Another example is the

drift flux model, the purpose of which is to account for radial variations is fluid density and

velocity. These two examples speak to the duel importance of neglecting radial dependencies in

the formal conservation equations while simultaneously including radial effects through semi-

empirical adjustments.

Finally, azimuthal dependencies are usually important only in horizontal flow, where

gravity strongly segregates the liquid and vapor phases due to the large difference in densities.

In vertical flow with uniform heating, this dimension is typically confidently neglected.

Basic Models

There are four basic approaches that can be used to model the thermal hydraulics of two-

phase flow. Each method explicitly defines the number of independent conservation equations

used. The number of closure relations that link the corresponding conservation equations

increases as the number of conservation equations increase, so that the number of conservation










equations minus the number of closure relations will always equal three. While complexity

increases as the number of conservation equations increase, the variety of information obtained

about the flow also increases. This does not necessarily mean that predictions for pressure drop

and heat transfer will be better for a six-equation model compared with a three-equation model.

It simply means that more predicted information will be generated. The reliability of these

predictions will depend directly on the validity of the closure relations and assumptions used to

develop the overall modeling approach.

The most sophisticated model is called the two-fluid model, in which there are separate

mass, momentum, and energy equations for each of the phases. Closure relations must link the

corresponding equations for each phase; mass, momentum, and energy transfer rate terms are

defined at the phasic boundaries. The mass transfer term is relatively simple and is directly

related to the change in quality. The momentum and energy transfer terms are more complicated

at they depend on the momentum and energy associated with the newly vaporized fluid. They

also depend upon the interfacial shear and heat transfer rates two terms for which data are

difficult to obtain. These terms are usually developed in terms of theory and assumptions, or a

combination of theory and experimental findings.

In addition to the interfacial closure relations, there must also be relations for momentum

and energy transfer at the fluid-wall boundary. These conditions are usually determined with

more confidence because the experimental data that have been generated to understand these

conditions are more complete. Research in single-phase flow, which has been extensively and

reliably performed, often applies. For instance, the wall friction is a term that is of fundamental

importance to engineers, and therefore has been studied since the beginning of the science of

fluid mechanics. Heat transfer also is of fundamental importance. To simplify the analysis of









data from an experiment, the wall-to-fluid heat transfer boundary is usually established as one of

two conditions constant heat flux or constant wall temperature. With either, the wall heat

transfer boundary condition is well defined.

The next simpler model includes five equations. In this, the developer can choose which

conservation equation to simplify, but usually selects either momentum or energy. In two-phase

flows, it is commonly accepted that the pressures of both phases are the same. Therefore, the

momentum equations for the two phases are usually reduced to one. This is accomplished by

equating the interfacial momentum transfer terms, since they must be the same. That is, the

momentum that one phase loses at the interfacial boundary is gained by the other. This approach

has the great advantage of eliminating the interfacial shear stress term. Alternatively, the

developer may choose to equate the energy transfer terms in a similar fashion. This eliminates

the need to determine the rate of sensible heating of the liquid phase.

A further simplification is made by reducing the number of independent conservation

equations to four. In this case, there is sometimes a specific piece of information required, such

as velocity slip.

The simplest approach is the three-equation model, also called the homogeneous

equilibrium model (HEM). In this, equations of mass, momentum, and energy conservation use

properties that represent the mass-weighted values of the vapor and liquid phases. There is no

information regarding the separate velocities of the phases. Equilibrium quality is used, which

neglects liquid subcooling or superheating, and vapor superheating. In spite of its simplicity, the

HEM is often cited as a standard against which the results of other models are compared.

Flow Regime Analysis

When the more complicated models are used, it is frequently necessary to determine the

structure of the two phases relative to each other. The various structures in two-phase flow have









been distilled down to a few flow regimes. A heated two-phase flow progresses through these

flow regimes as it increases in quality. The specific set of flow regimes may be different for

different conditions. For example, flow through a horizontal pipe can experience separated flow

with the heavier species at the bottom of the pipe, and the lighter species at the top a flow

structure not developed in vertical tubes. Flow through vertical tubes can also progress through a

different set of flow regimes, depending upon the amount of applied heat. Low heat loads will

result if pre- Critical Heat Flux (CHF) conditions. The vapor phase is generated at the wall and

migrates to the center of the tube. Liquid is always on the surface of the tube wall until dryout

occurs at high qualities. After this, the liquid is dispersed as droplets in a continuous vapor

matrix. High heat loads can produce post-CHF conditions, or IFB, at very low qualities. In this

situation, the wall is too hot for liquid to remain. Vapor stays along the wall of the tube

throughout the increase of quality. The progression of flow regimes in IFB are IAFB, AIAFB,

and DFB. These flow regimes are presented in Eigure 2-1. If the mass flux is low, then ISFB can

occur after IAFB. Note that this figure, taken from Takenaka (1989), does not include the 'B'

for boiling in the regime nomenclature that this dissertation includes. IAFB is characterized by a

relatively smooth interface between the vapor and liquid. The liquid flows through an annulus of

vapor. The interfacial area is easy to determine assuming the void fraction is known. AIAFB is

characterized by a rough interface. The liquid core is still whole, or in separate, parallel liquid

filaments, but is rough such that determining its surface area is no longer a straight forward

calculation using void fraction. The area for heat and momentum transfer likely increases

relative to IAFB even though the amount of liquid is decreasing. Finally, in DFB, the liquid core

completely breaks up into drops and is carried along in the continuous vapor matrix. This flow

structure is very similar to pre-CHF dispersed flow.









Because the physics of the flow is strongly dependent on the flow regime, it is common to

base closure conditions and other modeling decisions on the local flow regime. Of course, this

requires that the various transitions between regimes be predictable. As pointed out in chapter

one, Ishii has put in significant effort to develop predictive models. His more recent work is

with heated Freon 113 in relatively low velocity conditions. Observations are that the void

fraction at the point of dryout has a significant impact on the flow regime transition correlation.

The correlation is as follows (Babelli et al. 1994):


= 55 (2.1)
D cr 0.854]-

In this relation, L is the length at which the flow regime transitions from IAFB to DFB, D is

diameter, Clf is the fluid viscosity, jJ is the volumetric flux, o is the surface tension, and oes is the

void fraction.

Takenaka (1989, 1990) generated a flow regime map for IFB, as shown in Figure 2-2

where coordinates are equilibrium quality and total mass flux. Note that inlet velocity is used on

the ordinate instead of mass flux, but his final map actually used mass flux. For his test

conditions, this map predicted the IFB regimes he viewed.















































01 a
- 0.1 0


0.3 0.4 0.5


2


Figure 2-1. Various flow regimes for IFB (Takenaka, 1989). The ISFB regime on the left is
associated with low mass flow rates.


L1


1,


.~ .


Ifsub =10 n
0 IF
SAIAF
D F
I1SF








Vin= 0.14ats


1.0E


qx-a XtppM


(a)


a


0.6 -


_I


0.2


Figure 2-2. Flow regime map generated by Takenaka for IFB (1989). Flow regimes are IAFB in
region (a), AIAFB in region (b), DFB in region (c), and ISFB in region (d)


0.1









CHAPTER 3
TEST DATA DESCRIPTION AND EVALUATION AND MODEL DEVELOPlVENT

Description of Experiments

As referred to earlier, the data used to validate the model were generated at NASA Glenn

Research Center (formerly Lewis Research Center) and published in two separate technical

notes, NASA TN 765 and NASA TN 3095, in 1961 and 1966, respectively. These data will be

referred to collectively as the NASA data to distinguish it from other hydrogen experiments, or

as the 1961 and 1966 data when the data from the individual reports are discussed. The

experiments were performed in support of rocket engine modeling for the US manned space

program.

Experimental Setup

The experimental setup for the 1961 experiments is presented in figure 3-1. Hydrogen was

stored in a large tank and pressurized by gaseous hydrogen to force it through the system. Piping

from the tank to the test section and the test section were enclosed in a vacuum environment to

eliminate convection heat transfer to the piping and working fluid. The vacuum container was a

stainless steel cylinder 38. 1 cm in diameter. Heat was generated inside the tube metal by

applying a voltage across its length. The power supply for heat generation was external to the

vacuumed environment. Therefore, the leads for the voltage supply, along with instrumentation

leads, were passed through the wall of the vacuum chamber. The voltage was applied to the

heated test section through copper flanges brazed to the tube. It was found that unevenly brazed

joints distributed the power unequally circumferentially in the tube. Therefore, multiple

connections to the buss bar were made and the brazed joint was X-ray inspected. After passing

through the heated test section, the hydrogen was completely vaporized and then exhausted

through the roof of the facility into the atmosphere. All system flow conditions were remotely









controlled. The system pressure and flow rate were set by valves upstream and downstream of

the test section.

The setup of the 1966 experiments is similar to that of the 1961 setup. Figure 3-2 presents

the configuration. More useful information is given in the 1966 report that will be repeated here.

It is pointed out that the liquid hydrogen storage tank is enclosed in a vacuum to mitigate

heating. This in turn is contained within a liquid nitrogen radiation shield to mitigate conversion

of parahydrogen to orthohydrogen. Finally, this is contained within a foam insulated container.

The liquid hydrogen was forced through the flow system using gaseous normal hydrogen as a

pressurant. Just upstream and downstream of the test section were mixing chambers of high

turbulence in which the fluid bulk pressure and temperature were measured. Mixing the fluid in

the mixing chambers and having an entrance length to the test section were found to be important

since there could be some thermal stratification of the liquid as it is transferred from the storage

tank to the test section, with warmer liquid adj acent to the wall and colder liquid in the center of

flow.

Five different tube diameters were used in the NASA experiments, ranging from 0.48 cm

to 1.29 cm inside diameter, and all were vertical with hydrogen flowing upwards. The heated

test section length in the 1961 and 1966 experiments are 30.5 cm and 61.0 cm long, respectively.

Straight, unheated approach lengths were included in all test sections; approximately 12.7 cm for

the 1961 tests, and 30.5 cm for the 1966 tests. Approach sections and test sections were

contained within the vacuum environment. Figure 3-3 and 3-4 present the test sections for the

1961 and 1966 data, respectively.

Experimental Conditions

Heat fluxes and mass flow velocities are very high, and tube diameters are similar to those

used in regeneratively cooled rocket engine nozzles and other rocket engine piping. The










experimental conditions of these data reflect the nature of hydrogen flowing in a rocket engine.

Table 3-1 presents a summary of test conditions.

Heat was generated within the test sections by applying a voltage across the length of the

section. Care was taken to ensure a uniform weld of the copper flange around the tube so that

current would flow uniformly down the tube. As Hendricks (personal communication, 2006)

stated the problem,

The most damaging effect [on uniform heat generation] was the braze j oint between the
tube and the copper flange. Erratic j points distributed power unequally into the tube and the
current paths in turn did not heat the tubes properly.

Heat Leaks

Paths for undesired heat transfer into or out of the system that have not already been

addressed were either analyzed or otherwise considered by the authors of the 1961 data and

determined to be insignificant.

Instrumentation

All test sections were instrumented for local static pressure, tube outside wall

temperatures, and local voltage drops. Accuracy was of paramount importance (Hendricks,

personal communication, 2006). When initial results of tube wall temperatures ran counter to

anything previously experienced or expected, double and triple instrumentation redundancy was

implemented to determine the source of the "error". Data published in the reports represent

those deemed most accurate of the redundant measurements. Figure 3-5 illustrates some

specifics of thermocouple and pressure tap installations. The 1961 report gives no information

about instrumentation measurement accuracies. The 1966 report gives information on this

subj ect, and in general, the accuracies of instrumentation and measurements in the 1961 data are

consistent (Hendricks, personal communication, 2006).









All test sections had 12 thermocouples along the outer surface of the heated lengths, plus

inlet and exit temperatures in the mixing chambers. Thermocouples were either copper-

constantan, which were silver soldered, or Chromel-Alumel, which were welded in place.

Connections to the tube outer wall were made with great care to avoid affecting the test

conditions or measurements. Leads from the thermocouples were 30 gage wire. Circumferential

thermocouple placements were intended to determine the circumferential uniformity of power

distribution in the tube and as checks for accuracy. The cold junction was atmospheric boiling

nitrogen in the 1961 data, while the 1966 data used either liquid nitrogen or ice.

Thermocouple accuracy was determined by the recording system accuracy, standard

calibration, lead wire and junction temperature gradients. The mixing chamber fluid temperature

measurements were estimated to have less than 1% probable error. Multiple thermometers in the

mixing chambers agreed to within 1.1 K at the inlet and 5.6 K. No percent accuracy is given

for the tube surface thermocouple measurements. Tube surface temperatures were checked by

comparing multiple thermocouple readings attached by different techniques. The readings

usually agreed to within 15.6 K.

The 1961 data had five static pressure taps spaced along the length of the test section and

one at each of the inlet and exit mixing chambers. These pressure measurements were not

differential relative to a datum. The other four tubes from the 1966 experiments had three static

pressure taps spaced along the test section, and one at each of the inlet and exit mixing chambers.

These pressure measurements were differential relative to the pressure reading just upstream of

the test section inlet. No pressure taps on any of the five test sections were located at the same

axial location as a wall thermocouple. To complete the pressure data set, smooth curves were

hand-fitted through the measurements. From these curves, pressure values were interpolated at










the locations corresponding to the 12 thermocouple measurements. Commercial transducers

with a maximum of 1% full-scale nonlinearity were used. Readings from these transducers were

confined to half of the full scale. Therefore, errors from the pressure readings were estimated to

be 2%. Unfortunately, the range of the transducers is not given, and efforts to discover this

information have been unsuccessful. The differences in local static pressure measurements were

found to agree with differential pressure measurements to within 20%. This was reported to

correspond to an absolute static pressure measurement uncertainty of 1%.

Mass flow rates were measured both upstream and downstream of the test section. A

venturi was placed upstream of the test section and a sharp-edged flow orifice was placed

downstream of the heat exchanger. A second venturi, primarily used for flow control, was also

used for mass flow measurements. Measurements from these were compared for accuracy, and

all agreed to within 3%.

Local values of voltage drops were measured by eight voltage taps along the length of the

heated test section to assist in determining local power generation. Two sets of voltmeters and

ammeters that had independent shunts or taps were used. These incremental measurements of

power input were summed and compared with the overall power input measured by voltage and

ammeter taps at the bottom and top of the test section. Agreement between these two methods

was good (Hendricks, personal communication, 2006). Accuracies for these measurements are

stated to be +1%.

The values of the eight voltmeter measurements were not included in either publication.

However, as will be explained later, these measured local voltage drops appear to have been used

to determine local heat transfer coefficients, and in this sense, the local voltage drops are

included.









Data Validation

The literature search has revealed five maj or experimental efforts investigating the heat

transfer characteristics of convective internal pipe flow boiling hydrogen. Two of these are the

1961 and 1966 NASA reports that are the focus of this dissertation. The other three were also

performed during the early stages of the U.S. manned space program. These studies were

scrutinized for possible use to validate the NASA data set.

Comparison with Similar Data

Core et al. (1959) performed experiments with hydrogen similar to those in the 1966 data,

but with much fewer measuring points of pressure and temperature. Twenty-seven heat transfer

tests with liquid hydrogen flowing through an electrically heated stainless steel test section, 6.35

cm long and 0.213 cm inside diameter, were completed in the series. Each test comprised a

number of different steady state conditions, isolating the effect of changing inlet pressure, mass

flux, or heat flux. As a result, there are a total of 164 steady state conditions, with two points of

heat transfer coefficient measurements each, in the set. Only the inlet pressure was measured, so

a pressure loss analysis cannot be compared with data. The authors did not present a theoretical

correlation for the heat transfer coefficient. Their primary goal was to evaluate the utility of

hydrogen as a regenerative rocket nozzle coolant. This source stands out as the only one that

presents wall superheats that are likely to represent transition boiling conditions. While most

experimental results indicate that transition boiling occurs between wall superheats of 5 K and 20

K, the data in this experiment show some superheats between these values. Therefore, these data

may represent results from transition boiling. Table 3-2 presents comparisons of heat transfer

coefficients averaged from the two points of measurement on the test section, compared with

runs with similar conditions from the NASA data set. The Core et al. data set includes calculated

equilibrium qualities based on pressure and enthalpy. Negative equilibrium qualities were set to









zero. Therefore, inlet subcooling is not known. The two calculated heat transfer coefficients for

each run in the Core et al. data are averaged and compared with the average heat transfer

coefficient for runs with similar conditions over the same equilibrium quality range in the NASA

data set. Sets of compared runs are separated by bold lines in the table. The first runs listed in

each comparison is from the Core et al. set, while the second listed run is from the NASA data

set. The RMS difference between these comparisons is 46.2%.

Wright and Walters (1959) experimented with liquid and vapor hydrogen flowing in a 15.2

cm long and 0.635 cm inside diameter heated tube. Most of their 35 steady state liquid hydrogen

experiments were pre-CHF, with 11 runs showing wall-to-bulk temperature differences

consistent with IFB. In fact, their data show a marked gap in wall-to-bulk temperature

differences between 2.8 K and 22.2 K. Temperature differences between these values were not

obtained. This gap is consistent with a transition in flow regime from pre-CHF and CHF

conditions to IFB. They concluded that stable fi1m boiling could occur for wall to bulk

temperature differences as low as about 22 K. Test section pressure measurements were not

obtained. There are three runs from their data set with conditions similar to several runs in the

1961 data. Table 3-3 presents the test conditions and average heat transfer coefficient over the

tube length. Note that the average heat transfer coefficient listed for the 1961 data represent an

average of points two through six. This omits the first point that is affected by inlet conditions

and concludes at approximately 15 cm into the test section. The heat transfer coefficients from

the two different test series agree well.

Lewis et al. (1962) experimented with boiling hydrogen and nitrogen flowing upward in a

type 304 stainless steel, electrically heated vertical tube 41.0 cm long and 1.41 cm inside

diameter. Critical heat fluxes corresponding to transition to IFB were determined over a range of









flow rates, heat fluxes, and qualities. They noted that the maximum CHF increased with

increasing mass flux and decreased as the point of transition occurred farther into the tube.

These findings are consistent with the interpretation of runs 22, 26, 29, and 30 from the NASA

data in figure 3-11 that will be discussed later. The mass flow rates in these experiments were so

low that no measurable pressure drops were observed. Wall superheats were similar to those

observed in the NASA data, with a maximum wall superheat of 500 K. Since mass fluxes and

heat fluxes are an order of magnitude lower than in the NASA data set, there are no test

conditions that are similar enough to warrant a comparison.

Table 3-4 summarizes the test conditions of the three forced convection heated tube flow

boiling hydrogen experiments discussed above and the NASA data. From the data in these three

experiments and other hydrogen experiments in geometries other than internal tube flow, it can

be said that transition boiling occurs between 5 K and 20 K. Review of tables 3-2 and 3-3 show

that the data from the NASA experiments are reasonably consistent with results from other,

similar works. From this comparison, it is determined that the NASA data are, in general, valid.

End Effects

From the 1961 data, it is obvious that axial heat conduction occurs in the tube wall. Using

the finite difference heat transfer theory presented by Incropera and DeWitt (2002), a Fortran

program was generated to model the end axial heat conduction effects for the purpose of

determining the data that are affected and should therefore be omitted from the analysis. It was

assumed that curvature effects on axial conduction were negligible. Therefore, a two

dimensional infinite plate with axial and radial heat conduction was used to approximate the tube

geometry. The middle of the length of the plate corresponds to the beginning of the heated test

section. Left of this position is the unheated approach section, while right of this point is the

section in which heat is generated by electrical current.










To ensure that the imposed boundary conditions did not affect the solution, lengths of 50

wall thicknesses were generated on either side of the midpoint, for a total length-to-thickness

ratio of 100. It was found that the number of radial nodal points were not crucial to generating

acceptable results, so a minimum number of five nodal points were selected in the y direction,

with nodes one and five at the tube inner and outer walls, respectively. For the length-to-

thickness ratio of 100, this required 401 nodal points in the x direction. Figure 3-6 presents the

nodal structure and applied power distribution. Note that the distribution in the x direction is too

close to discriminate separate nodes, and the power generation is typical.

The applicable energy equation is

82T d2T
~+ + = 0 (3.1)
Dx" 2 2 k

In this geometry, x is the axis parallel with the flow, and y is the radial direction. Also, q"' is

the heat generation rate per unit volume. The variation in thermal conductivity as a function of

temperature will have only a very small impact on the results provided a representative

temperature is used to select the constant thermal conductivity. The thermal conductivity can

therefore be assumed constant in the analysis.

The four boundary conditions applied to this problem are:

1. T(x + -oo,y) = 25 K (a representative liquid hydrogen temperature in approach section)
2. 8T/8x (x + +oo,y) = 0 (adiabatic boundary far into heated test section)
3. -k8T/8y = h(Tw-Tb) at (x,y=0) (conduction = convection at wall/liquid interface)
4. 8T/8y = 0 at (x,y=Y) (adiabatic surface at tube outer wall)


In the heated section, boundary condition three assumes that the axial heat transfer is much less

than the radial heat conduction at the wall-liquid interface. To use this boundary condition, an

estimate of heat transfer coefficient that supports the purpose of the particular scenario at hand is

used.









For each problem, the following four parameters must be specified; wall thickness, wall

thermal conductivity, heat generation rate, and fluid-to-wall heat transfer coefficient. The heat

transfer coefficients used in this analysis come from those values listed in the 1961 data set at the

first point, which is 1.4 mm above the heated section inlet. The algorithm was iterated until the

maximum difference in temperature in adj acent iterations was less than 1.0E-6 K.

The computer model was validated through five observations. First, the boundary

conditions at the left and right hand sides of the tube are satisfied, as is the boundary condition

corresponding to the outside of the tube wall. Second, it is logical that the point of largest

temperature slope should occur at the point that heat generation starts. Every scenario has

satisfied this requirement. Third, the effect of varying the parameters listed above affect the

results in a reasonable way. For example, increasing metal thermal conductivity causes the

effect of heat conduction to be felt deeper into both sides of the point of heat generation. Fourth,

magnitude of predicted inner and outer wall temperatures are reasonably close to those published

in the 1966 report (1961 report did not publish outer wall temperatures). Two runs, seven and

11, were selected at random for comparison purposes. For run seven, the inner and outer wall

temperatures are 231 K and 269 K, respectively, while the model calculated 207 K and 238 K.

Run 11 inner and outer wall temperatures are 461 K and 482 K, with model predictions of 412 K

and 431 K. Finally, the difference in tube inner and outer wall temperatures in the heated portion

reasonably agree with published data. Again, using runs seven and 11, the published differences

are 38 K and 19 K, while the model results are 31 K and 19 K. These differences are deemed to

be well within the uncertainty in the four parameters and errors associated with the model

assumptions for the intended purposes of this analysis.










Figures 3-7 and 3-8 present inner and outer wall temperatures for the scenarios in which

thermal conductivity and wall thickness are parameters. The two dimensional effects are

noticeable in the right hand portion of the tube.

To evaluate the effect of each parameter listed above on the tube end wall temperatures,

high and low values of each parameter were run, with all other parameters set to nominal values.

The length from the heated section inlet to the point at which 95% of the Einal temperature is

achieved was determined for each run and compared. Large differences in lengths by which

95% of the Einal temperature is achieved indicate a significant parametric effect on tube end axial

heat transfer. Figure 3-9 presents the results of the computer model. Since the difference in

outer and inner wall temperatures is small, only the outer wall temperatures are presented for

each scenario for clarity. Table 3-5 shows the distances in thicknesses from the heat section inlet

at which 95% of the Einal temperatures are achieved. This analysis suggests that the effect of end

axial heat conduction in the tube metal increases with increasing thickness and thermal

conductivity, and decreasing heat transfer coefficient. It is approximately independent of heat

flux. For a given test section, wall thickness and thermal conductivity are determined. The

remaining variable that changes the end effect for a given test section is the heat transfer

coefficient.

To determine the maximum distance into the heated test section that experimental results

might be affected, the worst-case heat transfer coefficient of 1000 W/m2-K was used for all test

sections. This is half the lowest heat transfer coefficient in the entire data set, and should

represent a worst-case scenario in the unheated section where liquid hydrogen is flowing next to

the tube wall. That is, liquid hydrogen will have a significantly higher heat transfer coefficient

than will vapor hydrogen. Table 3-6 presents the model results and suggests that all test section









data more than 0.8 cm from the heated test section boundaries are adequately unaffected to be

used in the analysis. As a result of this analysis, all 12 points in the 1966 report will be used

since the end points in these runs are far more than 1 cm from the ends. However, points 1 and

12 in the 1961 data are theoretically affected, and the data of wall temperatures strongly supports

this conclusion. Therefore, these 40 points will be excluded from the heat transfer and pressure

drop analyses, leaving 572 points for consideration. All other data in the 1961 report are

predicted to be adequately unaffected and will be used.

Hydrogen States: Parahydrogen and Orthohydrogen

Hydrogen is naturally found as a molecule composed of two atoms of hydrogen, j oined by

a covalent bond. The proton at the nucleus of each atom has a spin associated with it giving rise

to four possible combinations of spin pairs between the two protons of a hydrogen molecule, H2-

Three of these combinations of nuclear spins are symmetric, resulting in orthohydrogen (ortho),

while the fourth combination is antisymmetric, resulting in parahydrogen (para). This two-state

nature or hydrogen is significant for several reasons. The heat of formation released during the

transition from ortho to para, coupled with the unstable nature of ortho at low temperatures, can

cause significant boil-off of stored hydrogen if ortho constitutes a large fraction of the liquid.

Ortho conversion to para is an exothermic process, with the emission of 703 kJ/kg of heat at 20

K, which is significantly more than the latent heat of vaporization of 443 kJ/kg. Secondly, the

thermal properties of specific heats and thermal conductivities of the two forms are known to be

significantly different at cryogenic conditions, causing the need to consider the issue of the

ortho-para makeup of the test fluid throughout the test section.

The relative equilibrium abundance of each form varies with temperature. At room

temperature, the ratio is 3 parts ortho to 1 part para, reflecting the number of spin combinations

available to each form. This state of hydrogen is called normal hydrogen. The ratio changes to a










larger proportion of para as the fluid is refrigerated. At 20.4 K, the ratio is 0.002 parts ortho to

0.998 parts para, at equilibrium. Note that time is needed to allow for equilibration, which can

be hastened in the presence of a catalyst.

There are four processes in which one form of hydrogen can transition into the other;

collisional, spontaneous, adsorption, and radiative. The collisional process can be further

segregated to homogeneous and heterogeneous processes. Through the homogeneous collisional

transition, an ortho molecule acts as a paramagnetic medium through which spin exchange

occurs either with another ortho molecule or a para molecule (Iverson, 2003). The

heterogeneous collisional transition requires a catalyst, such as a tank or pipe wall, that is

propitious to the transition of one form to another. This method involves the interaction between

the magnetic Hield generated by a magnetic material and the magnetic Hield associated with the

nuclear spin of the H2 HUClOUS. The interaction causes a reversal of spin in one of the nuclei,

which effectively changes the form from one to the other. In both of these collisional processes,

the transition from ortho to para is exothermic in the form of increased kinetic energy of the

participating molecules. Natterer et al. (1997) describe a method of catalyzing the transition of

ortho to para by flowing hydrogen through a tube that is charged with charcoal. Without a

catalyst, the conversion from ortho to para liquid hydrogen has a time constant on the order of

180 hours (Scott, 1959). Milenko et al. (1997) measured natural ortho-para conversion rates

within a wide region of hydrogen fluid states, including fiye different liquid temperature states.

Their Eindings indicate a conversion time constant near 12 hours.

The spontaneous transition of ortho to para produces a photon, and is therefore also an

exothermic process. Ehrlich (1991) sites theoretical results showing that the time constant for an

isolated ortho molecule to transition is on the order of 1011 years.









Chemical adsorption of the hydrogen on the metal can lead to conversion of hydrogen.

Ptushinskil (2004) addressed the physics of this process. The adsorption process is composed of

physisorption and chemisorption, which denote different levels of interaction between the

hydrogen molecule and the metallic surface. These two levels are separated by a repulsive

barrier of variable magnitude. As of yet, no theory for the time constant of transition between

the para and ortho states for this process have been found.

The fourth method considered here requires radiation bombardment of the hydrogen. In

this process, H2 mOlecules dissociate due to the bombardment. The subsequent hydrogen atoms

can recombine with each other generating, on average, the equilibrium ratio of para and ortho

forms associated with the system temperature (Kasai, 2003). Since the hydrogen storage tank

used in the NASA tests was surrounded by a radiation shield, this process is not expected to

contribute significantly to the production of ortho.

Iverson (2003) presents a method to quantify the dynamic equilibrium density of para and

ortho in a mixture of liquid hydrogen with collisions and irradiation present. He uses the

following set of equations to quantify the concentration of ortho and para, considering

homogeneous and catalyzed transitions:

dn,
= Kponlno -Ko Y1 pon p Copno (3.2)

dn
S= Ko1pnpno -KopIIZ ponp'~ Copno," (3.3)


subj ect to the conservation equation,

no(t)+ n,(t)= NH2 (3.4)

In the above equations, no, n,, and NH2 are the densities of ortho, para, and all H2 mOleCUleS,

respectively. K,o and Kop are COHVersion factors for homogeneous conversions from para to










ortho, and from ortho to para, respectively. C,o and Cop are COnversion constants for catalyzed

conversions in a similar sense. Both the homogeneous and catalyzed conversion constants are

strong functions of system temperature and pressure. Milenko et al. (1997) provides information

about the values of the constants.

Hendricks et al. (1961) analytically quantified the various means of transition from para to

ortho and visa versa and chose to neglect the effects based on the results. For the analyses in the

NASA reports, 100% para was assumed. It is stated, though, that neglecting the presence of

ortho may introduce error into some of the heat balance calculations. An accurate quantification

of the ortho-para makeup was extremely important in the NASA analyses (Hendricks, personal

communication, 2006). While the parahydrogen flowed through the heated test section, there

was also concern about the transition from para to ortho as the fluid was heated.

To test for this possibility, one test section was gold plated and then used. This experiment

is based on the fact that any heterogeneously catalyzed transitions from para to ortho that occur

with a stainless steel test section should be eliminated by the gold plating. Since the transition

from para to ortho is endothermic, a stainless steel tube should show lower wall temperatures

than the gold-plated tube under the same test conditions. However, the opposite effect was

observed, which was attributed to experimental error. Their assessment was that the residence

time of the hydrogen molecules in the test section was not long enough to generate significant

ortho concentration from the para population as it was heated and flowed in the tube to warrant

adjusting the properties from the assumed 100% para makeup. 100% parahydrogen is assumed

in the current analysis.

Model Development

Inverted annular film boiling of hydrogen is modeled in this analysis as a separated flow of

vapor and liquid. The liquid flows as a homogeneous core through an annulus of homogeneous










vapor. In this geometry, the vapor interfaces with both the wall and the liquid core, while the

liquid interfaces only with the inner boundary of the vapor annulus. All of the heat from the wall

is assumed to be absorbed by the vapor through convection. Radiation of energy to the vapor or

directly to the liquid is assumed, and has been shown, to be negligible. Additionally, momentum

loss through friction at the wall is largely a function of vapor conditions. This approach is

consistent with the experimental observations of Kawaji and Banerjee (1983, 1987). In their IFB

quench front experiments with water flowing upward in a highly heated quartz tube, bubbles

were seldom observed in the liquid core. They concluded that nearly all the vapor generated at

the liquid-vapor interface flowed upward in the vapor film. They also found no evidence that the

liquid column rewetted the tube wall.

Local static pressures, tube wall temperatures, and voltage drops were recorded. This is

enough information for only a three equation model, also known as a homogeneous equation

model (HEM), with mixture mass, momentum, and energy conservation equations. An extensive

literature search has not uncovered data-based models for vapor superheat or vapor slip in the

flow structure of this analysis. It is likely that these profiles will be unique relative to pre-CHF

flows, so that information on vapor superheat and slip from pre-CHF will not apply.

It was desired to obtain void fractions from the hydrogen data. To obtain useful void

fraction data, it was determined that a no-slip condition was not acceptable, since the slip ratio

directly affects the void fraction. In addition, a reasonable value for vapor velocity was desired

to allow for a reasonable estimate of frictional losses. Also, since void fraction and slip are

related to density, it was determined that the vapor superheat needed to be quantified. Without

information regarding superheat, vapor velocity slip, or applicable information regarding void









fraction profiles, theory and assumptions must be applied if more information is to be obtained

from these hydrogen data than what a HEM can provide.

The desired information can be obtained with a one-dimensional, five-equation model,

with separate vapor and liquid mass and energy flows, but with one momentum equation. This

assumes that the local pressure is the same for both fluids, which is commonly accepted.

Completing this model requires closure conditions for two of the following three quantities;

vapor mass-specific energy flow, vapor slip, and liquid mass-specific energy flow. Since wall

temperatures are part of the data set, it was determined that a closure condition for the vapor

energy flow, through quantifying vapor superheat, could be reasonably determined. Neither the

liquid heating nor the vapor slip is well understood. It was determined to model the liquid

energy state. It was determined that modeling the interfacial momentum effects was not

necessary for the obj ectives of this analysis. Including such effects would lead to a two fluid

model .

Nature of Data

Consideration of figure 3-10 of tube inner wall temperatures minus liquid hydrogen

temperatures leads to the expectation that the vast maj ority of data is IFB. The vast maj ority of

data show very large temperature differences between the inner wall and the liquid hydrogen

temperature. These large temperature differences can only be sustained in an IFB flow structure.

The four runs presented in figure 3-11 exhibit at least one point with relatively low temperature

difference. It is likely that these points correspond to pre-CHF conditions, or possibly transition

boiling.

The trend of the temperature differences for these runs in figure 3-11 supports this

explanation. For example, run 30 has an extremely high mass flux of 3406 kg/m2-Sec and a very

low heat flux of 310 kW/m2. These operating conditions are most likely to delay the onset of









CHF and the transition to IFB, and this is what is indicated by the data. It is not until

approximately 40 cm into the heated section that the temperature difference increases greatly.

Run 29 has a lower mass flux of 2669 kg/m2-Sec and approximately the same heat flux and

would thus theoretically depart from nucleate boiling at a lower elevation than run 30. This is

indeed what the data show, with run 30 temperature difference increasing significantly starting

after the 16 cm point. Run 22 has a similar mass flux as run 30 at 3444 kg/m2-Sec, but a much

higher heat flux of 1128 kW/m2. One would expect this run also to transition to IFB at a lower

elevation than run 30. While the temperature differences for run 22 at low elevations is higher

than run 30's, it appears that the IFB structure is not stable until after the 24 cm point earlier

than the run 30 transition. Since runs 22, 26, 29, and 30 show that pre-CHF conditions exist at

least at some points, and the model generated to analyze these data assumes IFB conditions,

these four runs will be excluded from the analysis.

There are other experimental findings that support this conclusion to omit them. Previous

research with hydrogen indicates the magnitude of wall to bulk superheat that hydrogen will

allow before departing from nucleate boiling. Walters (1960) reported a maximum wall

superheat from his single-tube forced hydrogen flow heat transfer experiments of about 2.8K.

Sherley (1963) experimented with free-convection hydrogen heated by a small flat heating

surface and reported wall superheats as high as 6.1K. Class et al. (1959) experimented with free-

convection hydrogen on various surface conditions, heating surface orientations, and pressures.

For a very thin layer of silicone grease applied to the test section, wall superheats of about 16.7K

were reported. Graham et al. (1965) presented test results from parahydrogen pool boiling that

showed wall superheats of up to 5.6K at a system pressure of 290 kPa before departure from

nucleate boiling. Kozlov and Nozdrin (1992) measured heat fluxes and wall superheats at DNB









during pool boiling of hydrogen for steel, aluminum alloy, and copper at low pressures. They

found that wall superheats at DNB varied significantly between the three metals, as did the wall

superheats during return to nucleate boiling from film boiling when they reduced the heat flux.

At one atmosphere on steel, the wall superheat was on the order of 16 K. All of these studies

support the previously stated assumption that the vast maj ority of data from TN 3095 represent

post critical heat flux conditions.

Carey (1992) states that the variables affecting critical heat flux are tube diameter, system

pressure, and mass flux. The fourth controlling variable depends on whether the bulk flow is

subcooled or saturated. For saturated flow, Carey sites the critical quality, while for subcooled

flow it is the difference between saturation and bulk temperatures. Collier (1981) also lists

length to diameter ratio as an important parameter.

Chun et al. (2000) developed a new theoretical model for predicting CHF for low quality

flows of water and refrigerants in round tubes. Chun states that there is general agreement that

for highly subcooled flow, the liquid sublayer dryout approach performs well, while for low

subcooling the bubble crowding model performs better. No one model works well in all

conditions, though. Chun attempts to improve this situation by proposing that the controlling

factor in CHF is the evaporation of the superheated liquid layer along the tube wall.

Recent research into this issue has been performed by Celata et al. (1994, 1996, 1998,

2001) in Italy. While most of his research is focused on highly subcooled CHF of water, the

general concepts will probably prove relevant to liquid hydrogen. While Carey (1992) lists three

postulated mechanisms for CHF at low quality dryout under a growing bubble, vapor

crowding, and dryout under a vapor slug Celata states that the liquid sublayer dryout theory

predicts the CHF under a wide range of subcooled conditions.









Magnitude of Radiation Heating

Heat is transported from the tube inner wall to the hydrogen primarily through convection.

However, the large temperature differences experienced in the test series raises the concern that

radiative heat transfer from the wall to the vapor and/or liquid hydrogen may be significant.

While the exact analysis of radiation heating is complex, a simplified analysis of the worst-case

scenario will reveal that radiative heating is at least three orders of magnitude less than

convective heating.

Sparrow (1964) presented a thorough theoretical analysis of the effect of radiation heating

from a tube wall to a vapor/liquid flow in film boiling. His work generated a quantitative

criterion by which the relative significance of surface-to-liquid radiation can be determined. A

more recent paper by Liao et al. (2005), which presents an excerpt of his Ph.D. work, addressed

this complicated problem by modeling the liquid core flow as a long inner tube at the center of a

long outer tube. The equation for radiation heating he applied to this geometry is


q" d =(3.5)
1f 1-E r,


The emissivities, s, that will lead to the largest radiative heating are 1 for both hydrogen and

wall. In this equation, r is radius, and o is Stefan-Boltzmann constant. The radiative heat flux

then reduces to

q", =o-(T -T,(3.6)

The highest wall temperature from the data is 560 K, and the fluid temperature is roughly 25 K.

Using these values to represent the upper limit of radiative heating, the magnitude is 5.6 kW/m2.

The lowest heat flux in the data set is 294 kW/m2, SeVeral orders of magnitude larger.

Additionally, this lowest heat flux does not correspond to the highest wall temperature of 560 K









used in this analysis, but instead has a much lower wall temperature of 178 K. In summary,

there is no run in this data set that has a radiative heating contribution of more than 2% of the

total applied heat flux, and in fact is certainly much less than 2%. The impact of ignoring

radiative heating of hydrogen is therefore justified.

Conservation Equations

Most of the experimental runs have subcooled liquid entering the heated test section. The

amount of subcooling is appreciable, up to 7 K in some runs, and cannot be ignored in the energy

balance. The velocities attained in some of the experiments required that the stagnation

enthalpies of the two fluids be used in the energy balance instead of the static enthalpies. Thus,

the momentum and energy equations are coupled and must be solved simultaneously.

A one-dimensional model of this system was developed to calculate mass, momentum, and

energy balances. It is assumed that the pressure is constant across the flow cross-section, and

while separate velocities of the two phases are determined, the bulk velocity for each phase is

used. Additionally, bulk thermodynamic properties are assumed.

The conservation of mass equation is simply

w = w1 + w,, (3.7)

The liquid momentum equation is

d~p~,Au,) d(PA,;, )
dz dz +r, 2nr,d: gp, A,~,d: (3.8)
dz dz

where Ti and ri are the vapor liquid interface shear stress and radial location, and A, is the flow

area. The corresponding equation for the vapor phase is


d (puca~, z= d(PAUca )d: r, 2nr~ d: r,xi~d: gpg Ac,,d: (3.9)
dz dz









The velocity and area terms in these momentum equations can be replaced by use of the

following relations:


u = Gx(3.10)


G (1 x)
u1 (3.11)
P 10 a)

Ac, = aAe (3.12)

Ac,, = (1 a)A, (3.13)

In these equations, oc is the vapor void fraction.

During the expansion of the derivatives, the vapor density was allowed to vary as a

function of z. Doing so facilitates investigating the effect of vapor superheating and its axial

variation on the pressure profile. The liquid density axial variation was also allowed to vary.

Also during the expansion, certain derivatives were replaced with equivalent expansions that

used terms more amenable to the analysis.

In a one-dimensional analysis such as this, these separate momentum equations are

combined by equating the interfacial interactions of the two phases. The result is seen in

equation (3.14):

a S -2( -x)2x Ba (1 x)2 x x S,,S
dP I8z LPt(1 ) p,,a dx Pt (1- a)2 p,,a p~a T P,
dz


fi ,,,z1 X2 T z1+ z, + giP r 4j ,(1-a)+ p,,a
+ (3.14)
x-G r S p,apj (1 -x)z Sp P )
p a SPTP1 \1-a P









This equation is similar to that commonly presented in two-phase flow textbooks, but with

Jacobian expansions useful for this analysis. The following relation for the wall shear stress was

used:

f;G
r 95,(3.15)


As previously stated, the velocities attained in some experiments were high enough that

they should be included in the energy balance. Radiation heating of the liquid is ignored based

on the previous analysis of liquid heating by radiation. As a result, conservation of energy is

modeled as follows:

L!W~1I Gx / +1 G (1 x)`' 3.6
Q = wxh, w(- ) t* < x 3.6
2 p, a 2 p 1-a

where h is the enthalpy.

In the application of this equation, the total energy flow rate of the flow is determined to be

the total energy of the flow at the first point of measurements, point 1, plus the cumulative

energy added through heating:


()= w h+ u + q"A, (3.17)


As is the cumulative tube inner surface area up to a particular point of calculation.

Entrance Lengths

There are three types of entrance lengths considered here; hydrodynamic, thermal in the

fluid, and thermal in the tube metal. Although all test sections included straight entrance

approach sections approximately 12.5 cm and 30.5 cm long in the 1961 and 1966 data,

respectively, to develop the velocity and thermal profiles, this concern is obviated by the nearly

instantaneous and violent change in flow structure from single-phase liquid to IFB. Stated









another way, the history of the flow up to the start of heating is not important. Instead of

modeling liquid velocity and temperature profiles across the radius of the tube and their effects

on heat transfer and pressure drop, these processes are controlled by the conditions in the vapor,

the inception of which occurs at the heated section inlet, and in which the radial dimension is

constantly increasing.

The developing hydrodynamic and thermal profiles in the vapor from the test section inlet

onwards must still be considered. Hsu and Westwater (1960) used law-of-the-wall theory to

determine that the vapor in the annulus transitions from laminar to turbulent at a Re = 100.

Some rather arbitrary assumptions were employed in their theoretical analysis. Somewhat

marginally applicable computations from Rohsenow et al. (1956) for condensation on a vertical

plate were used to justify this transition Reynolds number. Regardless, this transition Reynolds

number appears to be commonly quoted and used to determine transition from laminar to

turbulent flow of the vapor in IFB. Note that for typical values of vapor density and viscosity,

and for typical velocities at the test section entrance, the vapor annulus dimension that produces

a Re of 100 is 0.001 cm an extremely small thickness. This film thickness is achieved at a void

fraction for the smallest tubes in the NASA data set, which will give the largest required void

fraction, of 0.008. From this, it is reasonable to assume that the vapor is always turbulent.

Additionally, it is hard to conceive of the vapor flowing in a laminar fashion after its violent

generation at the heated test section entrance.

As previously discussed, in the tube metal at the boundary between the heated test section

and the entrance piping, there will be a significant axial gradient in metal temperature. This will

lead to axial heat conduction, which in turn will affect the local heat flux and temperature.

Instead of the approximately constant heat flux established within the tube far from the









boundaries of the heated test section, the local heat flux can be significantly reduced. Measured

wall temperatures from the 0.795 cm diameter tube support this conclusion. It is important to

note that, while there is axial heat transfer in the metal, at any particular station near the inlet, all

of the energy that is calculated to be transmitted to the flow up to that point will indeed be

transmitted to the flow. Thus, the calculated total energy input to the flow up to a given point

will not be in error. At the test section exit, this is not the case. Heat flows up and out of the test

section at the exit. Thus, the flow will not receive all of the heat input until some point after the

heated section exit.

Boundary Conditions

The first point at which enough information is given to determine the thermodynamic state

of the flow is the first point listed in the tables of measurements for each run. For the 1961 and

1966 reports, this point is at 0.14 cm and 6.35 cm up from the test section inlet, respectively. If

the flow at this point is subcooled, then the published quality is zero, and the published

temperature and pressure is used to determine the thermodynamic state. If a positive quality is

listed, then the published pressure and quality is used.

Quality and void fraction are determined from the momentum and energy balances. The

balances calculate changes in static pressure and total energy. Therefore, the quality and void

fraction of the first point in each run must be determined in a method other than using these

balances. It was determined to initialize the quality and void to zero at the inlet. It was assumed

that quality and void increased monotonically at each successive point.

Implementing this boundary condition required knowledge of the thermodynamic state of

the fluid at the test section inlet. This information is not given directly. However, the energy

state of the fluid at the inlet can be found by subtracting the energy added from the inlet to the

first measured point from the energy of the flow at the first point. Assuming the energy









associated with the local velocity to be negligible relative to the enthalpy of the flow, this energy

level per unit mass is used as the bulk enthalpy of the flow. The pressure at the inlet is

determined using the same technique the authors used to determine the pressure profie Sit a

smooth curve through the measured points. The cubic least squares fit of the pressure profiles, as

previously described, were use to extrapolate backwards to calculate the test section inlet

pressure. Thus, pressure and bulk enthalpy are determined for the inlet. From this, the

thermodynamic and kinetic state of the liquid and vapor is determined. The inlet was then

defined to be point one for each run, and the number of points used in the analysis of each run

increased from 12 to 13.

The momentum equation requires positive qualities. However, as stated previously, many

runs had subcooled inlet conditions, and in fact remained subcooled from an equilibrium sense

for a number of points. Therefore, a method to establish a positive quality was necessary. The

literature search produced no model for true quality.

Hammouda (1996) presented a notional graph of the variation of true mass quality as a

function of length in IFB. Collier (1994) presents a similar graph on page 295. Hammouda' s

graph is not based on measurements, but instead from his interpretation of conditions based on

his observations of IFB. The slope of mass quality in IFB is positive at negative equilibrium

qualities. Near where equilibrium quality equals zero, the slope of mass quality with length

increases. At some low value of quality, mass and equilibrium qualities are equal, after which

equilibrium quality is greater. At an equilibrium quality of one, the mass quality is less than one

due to vapor superheating. This model encompasses the following three concepts in IFB: the

subcooled liquid experiences some sensible heating; vapor is present and accumulates while the









bulk flow is subcooled; due to vapor superheating, the flow will not be entirely vaporized when

the equilibrium quality equals one.

Closure Conditions

To complete the set of equations, the level of bulk vapor superheat, the amount of liquid

sensible heating, and the nature of the wall friction must be determined.

Vapor superheat

To quantify vapor superheat, several concepts were tried, including theory presented by

Burmeister (1993). He presents a theoretical derivation for the mixing cup temperature.

Following are the applicable energy equation and boundary conditions used:

aT 1 (vrq, )
pCpu~ (3.18)
8: r dr

subj ect to

dT (r = r z) qw
(3.19)
dr k

8 T ( = 0, z)
= 0 (3.20)
dr

Following are the assumptions used in his development.

1. constant wall heat flux
2. circular duct
3. flow velocity and temperature profiles are fully developed
4. u/Uarg
5. Pr is constant and 1
6. Prt = 1.0
7. Law of the wall applies, with sublayer, buffer, and core zones
8. u/UCL = 7/0)1 7, and radial temperature profile has the same form


The results of his analysis give a mixing cup temperature of the following form:


T,,, = 5 (T Tw) +T, (3.21)









The centerline temperature in this equation is the liquid temperature.

It seemed logical that the temperature profie in the vapor could be modeled as a turbulent

flow. Most of the assumptions listed above are well satisfied by these NASA data, and

arguments can be made for the remaining assumptions. Use of this model with the 5/6th

coefficient caused numerous energy balance errors, primarily in the 1961 data set. Various

coefficient values were tried between the theoretical 5/6th and the commonly-used '/. Energy

balance errors were minimized with the smallest coefficient of '/. Therefore, it was determined

to proceed with this value. This coefficient value is consistent with the analyses of Takenaka

(1989) in his IFB studies. Nijhawan et al. (1980) performed experiments in which they

measured vapor superheats in post-CHF flowing water. They observed significant superheating

of the vapor. Interestingly, their data strongly support the use in this effort of '/ for the vapor

superheat coefficient.

Liquid energy flow

To complete the theory for a Hyve-equation model, an assumption must be made regarding

the energy state of the liquid. Theory regarding heat transfer to the liquid flow can be found in

six-equation models, also called two-fluid models. Hedayatpour et al. (1993), in their two-fluid

model of a vertical line cooling with liquid nitrogen, used theory for water droplet heating in

superheated steam from Lee and Ryley (1968). The Nusselt number is modeled as

Nu = 2 + 0. 74 Reo 5 Pr 0 33 (3.22)

where the Reynolds number is evaluated at droplet conditions, and the Prandtl number is

evaluated at film conditions. This model was used in a flow geometry identical to that used in

this dissertation liquid core flowing homogeneously inside an annulus of vapor.










Hammouda (1997) observed that the heat transfer coefficients for the wall-to-vapor and the

vapor-to-liquid can both be modeled as functions of Reynolds number to a power and Prandtl

number to a different power. With some assumptions, he concluded that the ratio of vapor-to-

interface and wall-to-vapor heat fluxes were controlled as follows:

q"- T~ Ts
"' (3.23)
c": Tw -T

He gave no experimental justification for this model except that he noted predictions from his

two-fluid model provide better prediction accuracy than other IAFB prediction methods he

assessed.

The assumption used in this dissertation is that the liquid experiences no sensible heating.

It remains at its inlet temperature throughout the heated tube unless the local pressure drops to

the saturation pressure for the liquid temperature. From this point onward, the liquid temperature

assumes the saturation temperature at the local pressure.

Rationale for this assumption comes from the fact that vapor is definitely present during

IFB, even for subcooled flows. Therefore, the liquid certainly does not absorb and evenly

distribute 100% of the energy from the tube wall. That is, the fluid does not increase in

temperature to saturation before it starts to generate vapor. This observation easily extends into

the saturated condition in which it is logical to assume that a saturated liquid also does not

absorb 100% of and evenly distribute the energy input from the wall. The true nature of the

liquid heating almost certainly lies between the extremes of no sensible heating and

thermodynamic equilibrium.

Using some assumptions, the exact theoretical time-dependent liquid temperature profie as

it flows through the core of the tube can be solved. The liquid core is modeled as an infinitely

long rod of constant radius R having a uniform initial temperature T1 and instantaneously









subj ected to a uniform temperature bath at temperature Tsat. It is assumed that the bath

temperature is the saturation temperature of the fluid at the local pressure. That is, any liquid

that rises above the saturation temperature evaporates and leaves the liquid core and does not

heat the remaining liquid. Only liquid that is at the saturation temperature or lower remains to

conduct heat from the liquid/vapor interface inwards. This model also assumes that the liquid is

at a uniform temperature across its radius at the time heat is applied (the test section inlet), that

liquid radial velocity gradients are unimportant to heat transfer, and properties are constant. That

is, heat transfer in the liquid can be modeled by conduction alone.

The mathematical model that captures the physics of this problem is

aT k 1d 8 T\
= r -(3.24)
at pC r dr dr

subject to the following boundary conditions:

T(R, t) = T, (3.25)

dT(0, t)
= 0 (3.26)


and the initial condition:

T(r,0)= T, (3.27)

The time-dependent solution of this problem is (Arpaci, 1966)


T~r~)= T +2(, -T,) *J f )(3.28)
n (A,, R) Jz(,, R)

where hnR are the characteristic roots of the Bessel function of the first kind of order zero. The

solution of interest from this model is the average temperature rise for a typical differential liquid

volume that passes through the heated test section. Following are the values that will be used for

each term:









* R = 2E-3 m
* k = 0.1 W/m-K
* p = 60 kg / m3
* C = 2E4 J / kg-K
* Ts = 28 K
* T1= 25 K


These values correspond to a liquid subcooling of 3 K, which is a typical value. Also, a typical

differential fluid volume residence time in the test section of 1/30th Of a Second will be used.

Figure 3-13 presents the results that strongly support the assumption to ignore sensible heating of

the liquid. This is the assumption that will be applied in the model.

Wall friction

The frictional losses are modeled with a Blasius-type relation for the friction factor and a

two-phase friction multiplier developed by Rogers (1968) at Los Alamos National Lab. His

model was developed for friction modeled as only the liquid component of the two-phase flow

flowing alone. Thus, the friction factor is

f =0.079Re 0 25 (3.29)

Rogers' model was developed specifically for two-phase internal flow hydrogen. Although his

model is largely theoretical with some data validation, it is applicable to the entire two-phase

hydrogen pressure range, and is presented in closed form as follows:

2x 1( 8-,c 0 8187 0.1324(12.759 P)+ 003966(1.759P'] P)3
f5 x 1 PE (330


where pressure is in atmospheres, and E is

E = 1.896x 2.646x2 + 1.695 x3 (3.31)









Model Implementation

During the implementation of this theory, two observations directed the Einal form of the

algorithm. First, implementing the theory requires an iterative scheme with discretized quality

and void fractions. Each combination of quality and void fraction will result in errors in

predicted pressure drop and energy flow relative to measurement. Acceptable levels of error

must be defined, which results in a quality-void fraction pair domain of solutions from which a

Einal pair must be selected. Second, it was found that there are some points for which this model

will not simultaneously satisfy both momentum and energy conservation. This is due mostly to

the inaccuracies of the model, and probably to a lesser extent due to inaccuracies in experimental

measurements. For most points, momentum and energy conservation are satisfied with

negligible errors associated with the necessity of discretization.

It is for these two reasons that 'smart' iteration techniques failed. Several other methods of

Ending the correct quality-void fraction solution were implemented that relied on reducing the

error in energy and momentum by determining the correct direction to change each value.

However, these iteration methods were found to be inadequate due to the nature of the equations

in the problem and due to the fact that, in some cases, the solution of least error is greater than

the error limits for most other points.

Performing a 'dumb' progression of quality/void fraction pairs, while not conservative of

CPU time, was found adequate. Figure 3-14 presents the flow chart of the algorithm. Note that

the thermodynamic state of the vapor and liquid are known since liquid temperature, vapor

temperature (through the superheat equation), and local pressure are known.

The error limits place on calculated momentum and energy changes are 2% of

measurement. All quality-void fraction pairs that agreed with the measured pressure loss to

within 2% were saved for processing in the energy balance. This preliminary solution set was










then input to the energy balance. The solution domain is constrained by noting the contribution

of velocity to the total energy flow. It is significantly less than that of enthalpy even for the high

velocity flows. Therefore, the energy balance is a very weak function of void fraction and a very

strong function of quality. Thus, the quality range is always reduced to one or a few discretized

values, but with a range of void fractions that satisfy the momentum equation within the error

limits .

It is logical to use the liquid and vapor velocities to discriminate between the remaining

solutions. Various methods were tried. One method required the vapor velocity to be greater

than the liquid velocity at all points, but this did not work best for runs near the critical pressure.

A slip of less than one appears to satisfy these runs best. Another constraint that led to problems

for high pressure runs was to require the vapor velocity to increase monotonically up the tube. It

was finally determined to select the minimum vapor velocity from the set of solutions that

satisfied the energy balance within the specified error limit. This constraint eliminated extremely

high vapor velocities, some well over the sonic velocity, while giving reasonable results for high

pressure runs.

To address points for which momentum and energy conservation can not simultaneously

be satisfied, it was determined to equally increase the accepted momentum and energy errors

until a solution was obtained for both. Note that increasing the acceptable range of errors on

momentum consistently decreases the calculated errors in energy balance, so this method

identified the lowest level of error for both quantities while giving preference to neither.














Table 3-1. Table of experimental conditions for the NASA data se .
set run G Pin q" dp Subcool T D, inner Wall thickness Material
kg/m2-s kPa kW/m2 kPa K cm cm
1 1.1146 327 759 1193 27 -0.1 1.288 0.025 Inconel X
2 2.1152 643 969 948 22 -3.1 1.288 0.025 Inconel X
3 3.1143 329 743 735 15 -0.1 1.288 0.025 Inconel X
4 4.1151 488 1023 768 13 -2.6 1.288 0.025 Inconel X
5 5.115 662 1045 752 12 -3.8 1.288 0.025 Inconel X
6 6.1142 630 733 719 20 -1.3 1.288 0.025 Inconel X
7 1.1246 873 1075 1324 45 -4.1 1.113 0.081 Inconel
8 2.1247 536 1103 1308 76 -2.7 1.113 0.081 Inconel
9 3.1248 895 889 1242 41 -3.3 1.113 0.081 Inconel
10 4.1251 531 868 817 20 -2.4 1.113 0.081 Inconel
11 1.542 1237 616 1357 211 -2.9 0.851 0.051 304 Stainless steel
12 2.541 1119 861 1324 86 -4.8 0.851 0.051 304 Stainless steel
13 3.539 892 984 703 32 -6.6 0.851 0.051 304 Stainless steel
14 4.538 906 982 425 12 -7.2 0.851 0.051 304 Stainless steel
15 5.2 1553 1251 1766 102 -3.8 0.851 0.051 304 Stainless steel
16 6.201 1286 1112 1733 113 -2.7 0.851 0.051 304 Stainless steel
17 7.54 1178 759 2093 250 -2.6 0.851 0.051 304 Stainless steel
18 8.203 1129 1221 1733 93 -3.3 0.851 0.051 304 Stainless steel
19 9.204 1121 812 1635 148 -0.2 0.851 0.051 304 Stainless steel
20 10.535 945 685 1798 201 -1 0.851 0.051 304 Stainless steel
21 11.536 932 746 2076 223 -0.9 0.851 0.051 304 Stainless steel
22 1.568 3444 1265 1128 274 -6.6 0.478 0.079 Inconel
23 2.577 1965 1141 1112 232 -4.9 0.478 0.079 Inconel
24 3.559 2466 1059 1112 272 -6.2 0.478 0.079 Inconel
25 4.558 2446 1072 981 272 -6.2 0.478 0.079 Inconel
26 5.562 3186 856 670 160 -6.2 0.478 0.079 Inconel
27 6.56 2383 823 654 201 -4.3 0.478 0.079 Inconel
28 7.561 2735 817 670 146 -5.3 0.478 0.079 Inconel
29 8.564 2669 594 294 104 -3.8 0.478 0.079 Inconel
30 9.565 3406 613 310 124 -4.6 0.478 0.079 Inconel
31 10.563 2165 561 294 109 -2.7 0.478 0.079 Inconel
32 1.1802 1617 310 376 117 0 0.795 0.079 Inconel
33 2.1803 1242 279 376 68 0 0.795 0.079 Inconel
34 3.1804 849 228 376 51 0 0.795 0.079 Inconel
35 4.1805 575 188 376 38 0 0.795 0.079 Inconel
36 5.1806 1653 359 621 79 -0.8 0.795 0.079 Inconel
37 6.1807 1123 311 637 87 0 0.795 0.079 Inconel
38 7.1808 804 259 637 71 0 0.795 0.079 Inconel
39 8.2001 1553 399 981 107 -2.4 0.795 0.079 Inconel
40 9.2002 1242 359 981 103 -1.6 0.795 0.079 Inconel
41 10.2 858 303 997 114 -0.2 0.795 0.079 Inconel
42 10.2 721 257 997 101 0 0.795 0.079 Inconel
43 12.22 1379 448 1144 132 -1.3 0.795 0.079 Inconel
44 13.201 1626 457 1357 136 -3.2 0.795 0.079 Inconel
45 14.201 1206 399 1373 141 -2.1 0.795 0.079 Inconel
46 15.201 849 339 1373 146 -0.7 0.795 0.079 Inconel
47 16.201 712 286 1373 126 0 0.795 0.079 Inconel
48 17.22 1297 490 1520 149 -2 0.795 0.079 Inconel
49 18.22 922 408 1520 153 -0.8 0.795 0.079 Inconel
50 19.22 621 335 1520 132 0 0.795 0.079 Inconel
51 20.201 1516 498 1651 165 -3.2 0.795 0.079 Inconel














Table 3-2. Comparison of Core et al. (1959) heat transfer coefficients with Hendricks et al.

(1961, 1966)
0 q" Win I ~average h dteec
HO~fCO run yr-m vwr ka "= R %

nmcre et al. 1.3 ;u 4/4 921 1.4


MenarCKS et al. A b/ 3/6 1W 9.1U1




nmcre et al. 4.4 bb2 YYI ZU 2I








MenarlCKS et al. 4 / / 1U 3Ub-


MenarCKS et al. 4 / / 1U 31U-3


noemn~ et al. 6.3 MU1 6;tr 4.3


MenarCKS et al. Is b/b 3/6 14 1.U 2


n mcre et al. I. 494 1bb@ 4b .1/


nenarCKS et al. DU 1 ;4; lbZ 3b .1


n mcreet al. b. bb li dbbb


MenarCKS et al. DU 1 lb U 13 3954


MenarCKS et al. 42 12 I; W/3dU-










Table 3-3. Comparison of average heat transfer coefficients for similar runs in the Wright and
Walters (1959) data set and TN 765.
G q" Pin average h difference
Source run kg/(m2-sec) kW/m2 kPa kWI(m2-K) %
Wright & Walters (1959) 15 908 260 250 3.83
Hendricks et al. (1961) 34 849 376 228 3.08 24.3
Wright & Walters (1959) 23 522 385 167 3.11
Hendricks et al. (1961) 35 575 376 188 3.00 3.7
Wright & Walters (1959) 35 427 390 179 2.47
Hendricks et al. (1961) 35 575 376 188 3.00 -17.7

Table 3-4. Summary of test conditions for maj or forced convection internal tube flow boiling
hdrogen experiments
Mass flux, [kg/m2-Sec] Heat flux, [kW/m ]1 System pressure, [kPa]
Source min max min max min max
Core et al. (1959) 322 10271 16 98121 193 1469
Lewis et al. (1962) 4 231 11 1261 207 510
Wright & Walters (1959) 410 11721 10 3901 138 276
Hendricks et al. (1961) 575 16531 376 16511 188 498
Hendricks et al. (1966) 327 34441 294 20931 594 1265


parameter
thermal cond. heat xfer coeff. wall thickness heat flux 95% length
set # W/m-K kW/m2-K 1E-4m MW/m2 ticknesse
5 15 2 5 19
10 45 2 5 1 15
15 15 1 5 1 12.8
20 15 4 5 16
25 15 2 2 1 13.8
30 15 2 8 17
35 15 2 5 0.3 8.3
40 15 2 5 2 8.5


Table 3-6. Distance into tube wall from start of heating at which tube metal temperatures are
reduced by at least 5% from the nominal level.
Inner DIT Thermal Heat xfer 95%
Runs Diameter Thickness ratio Material cond. Heat Flux Coeff. distance
[cm] [cm] [W/m2-K] [MW~m2] [kW/m-K] [cm]

1- 1.288 0.025 51.5 Inconel X 13 1 1 0.41
7-1C 1.113 0.081 13.7 Inconel 13 1 1 0.73
11-21 0.851 0.051 16.7 304 SS 20 1 1 0.71
22-31 0.478 0.079 6.1 Inconel 13 1 1 0.69
32-51 0.795 0. 079 10.1 Inconel 13 1 1 0.71


Table 3-5.


Result of parametric sensitivity study of end axial heat conduction.















~lou P~~


Inlabtg


Building roof


Q Statie-ptrersse $p
4: Themneopler
A heaste
DP States difeCNtrenia
pressure transtneerQ I r
RT eanlatance themsemter s
V Vlolkraesar
VP Vauu pm
supply














traller, 1000-00L Dever
g~sase Illqu~li rt ll uply Jir
la Pree- home









Figure 3-1. NASA TN 765 experimental setup.


controll






















Vent line to
roof stack


Backpressure
cotrlf valve -1


Outlet mixing
cagaggy


Vacuum pu mp exhaust
to roof stack


vacuum enclosure


Emergesncy
burst disl






Pressurizing


To electrical


nryarogen


Entrance venturi '


CD-8233


Figure 3-2. NASA TN-3095 experimental setup.
















p Presure tap
T Pulid tapp.
5'F Buae theicrmocupl


Figure 3-3. NASA TN-765 data test section.














---T
Exhaust flow-metering orifice
---T



Heat echang~er


Additionarl profile
thermacoples
enmitd for clarity


Am meter


section


P Pressure tap
AP Differntial pressure tap
TI Thermomerter
TC Thermocouple


co-sm3


Entrance venturi


Figure 3-4. NASA TN-3095 test section











T~uomg 0.062 e.d. Irf 0.038 1. d.;
transition to 118 o. 1. pressure tubing

Stainless-steel hypodermic
tube; typically 0.032a.d. by0.0195 Ld.J SIlver solder

0.0145 Diam
stalic pressure port





(a) Pressure taps.


Ceramic cement an
tube for insulation


-Insulated thermacouple
wire 130 gage I0.010~ diam)


Junction is flattened,
ontou red to tube
curvature and spot We


bld Welded thermocouple junctions.


f" Ceramic cement over
function as filler and bond


r Flattened
( thermocouple
junction




-Metal clamp


Glass tape as lining '
to protect Junchan/
from clamp -/


\-Thermocouple lunction flattened
pressed and contoured to tube

CD-8234


Figure 3-5. TN 3095 instrumentation.


I ~U I











































































3D
SSIES


Figure 3-7. Radial metal temperature profiles as a function of metal thermal conductivity.








85


10 20
HICKN


0.0 .0 .1 15 00 0 00 5 00 0 0.3 .4 .4 .5
OX





AXIAL POSITON. m


O
U
r)



ru


o


o.000o 0 DOS


AXIAL POSITION,


0.035 D 040 0.045 0.05D


Figure 3-6. Nodal distribution and heat generation distribution used to model end effects at tube
inlet.


1--------k
6--------k


15, INNUER WALL
45, INNI\ER WALL


5 k
10 k


15, OUTER WALL
45, OUTER WALL


I


I


O
OD
LO,


V


Q
Ui
W





t


-40 -30
AX |-


-20 -10
POST










0.2, INNIER WAL
0.8, INNIER WAL


25 L
ZO L


0.2, OUTER WA
0.8, OUTER WA


A |-L POS T ON, THICKNIESSES


Figure 3-8. Radial metal temperature profiles as a function of metal thickness.


5 k=15 kW/m
25 =0.2mm


20 h=4kW/m2-K
40 n=2MW/m2


35 c=0.3MW/m2


|-L POS T ON, THICKNUESSES


Figure 3-9. Effect of specified parameters on tube end wall axial heat transfer.


















01 1


I I


I 'I I
r I ~B
I i
IC

r s
I 3 t
rl, I
I I

a I L 1 3 1
L t


C
I I
I
i I
161 D I
"I i I I
I I
^ 5.,


1

t C
I





20
ON


RO~M INLCET


50
C


10 V


Figure 3-10. Difference in wall to liquid temperature for all data considered.


22 u=3444,q=1128 26 G=3186,q=670


ZO G=3406,q=310


O
n
N


\/ D
Im


cC


G [kg m2-sec]

q [kW m2]


713


E E ATION


30
ROM IN


Figure 3-11. Wall to liquid hydrogen temperature differences for four runs that show at least one
very low difference. These small differences are associated with pre-CHF conditions.











Theoretical Radial Liquid Core Temperature Profile at Heated Test Section Exit, Based
on Typical Experimental Values



Core radius = 0.2 cm
k = 0.1 W /m-K

-p = 60 kg / m3
C = 2E4 J / kg-K
Tsat = 28 K
T, = 25 K
SLiquid residence time = 0.0333 seconds


0 0.05 0.1


28



27 -



26



25


0.15


Radial Position, cm



Figure 3-12. Theoretical liquid core temperature profile at the exit of the heated test section, to
support the assumption to ignore sensible heating of the liquid.











































Figure 3-13. Flow diagram for momentum and energy analysis of data.









CHAPTER 4
ANALYSIS AND VALIDATION OF MOMENTUM MODEL RESULTS

Data Referencing

The NASA data set comprises 51 steady state runs in which there are 13 data points each.

The first point is at the heated test section inlet. For runs 1 31, the 13th point is 6.3 cm before

the heated test section exit. For runs 32 51, the 13th point is at the heated test section exit. The

runs fall naturally into five groups based on inner diameter. Table 4-1 lists the tube dimensions,

the run numbers associated with each tube, and a reference number that will be used for

convenience in later analyses.

Data Refinement

It was determined through various means that the data set needed to be refined. Following

is a description of the approach to this process.

Omitted Data

The points that are affected by inlet and end conditions, and any calculations that include

these affected points, should be excluded from analyses. For runs 1-31, point 1 at the test section

inlet falls into this category. Only results between point 2 at 6 cm and point 13 at 55 cm will be

considered. For runs 32-51, points 1, 2, and 13 at the inlet, 0. 1 cm, and at the test section exit

will be excluded. Only results between point 3 at 1.6 cm and point 12 at 29 cm will be

considered.

Problematic Data

Validity of some data is questioned. The basis for questioning these points lies in apparent

discontinuities between adjacent values. Figure 4-1 presents several examples. Run 42 point 8

at 19 cm shows a rise in wall temperature of 40 50 K relative to adj acent wall temperatures.

This magnitude of temperature rise and fall over a 7 cm length, and the fact that the event is










exceptional in these data, begs an explanation. A similar effect is evident in run 32 at 27 cm. It

may be that a unique flow structure occurs for a short length in these runs. The computer model

is robust enough to accommodate many, but not all, of these changes and solve for the

momentum and energy balances within the specified limits.

For some points in which the wall temperature increases drastically from the previous

point, the model cannot satisfy the energy balance. This is because of the assumption that all of

the vapor at a point is at the calculated vapor temperature, which is a function of the wall

temperature. If there is a large increase in wall temperature, then the increase in mean vapor

enthalpy may require a larger energy addition than the energy added through heating from the

previous point, even with zero change in quality. To satisfy these points, the quality would have

to be reduced, which is assumed to not be possible in the model. This is why these points of high

increase in wall temperature are consistently associated with negative energy addition errors -

the measured added energy can not attain the increase is vapor energy.

Tube three exhibits a consistent decrease in wall temperature at the 34 cm location. Figure

4-2 presents the wall temperatures for all 11 runs on tube three. This is interpreted as a bias in

the measurement. Therefore, in making calculations using the wall temperature, these erroneous

experimental values have been replaced by a linear interpolation between adj acent points. The

only other wall temperature point that was deemed obviously out-of-family was run 42, at the 19

cm elevation. This point also was replaced by a linear interpolation between adj acent points.

While other points in the data set showed erratic trending, it was usually uncertain which points

should be modified. A common characteristic is for adjacent points to trend oppositely, e.g., one

low and the next high. Which point was biased was usually not determined. Therefore, no

modifications were made.









Also evident in figure 4-1 are the end effects in which heat is conducted axially within the

tube metal at the inlet and exit of the test section, as discussed in chapter 3. The steep gradient in

wall temperatures for most runs between points 2 and 3 at 0.14 cm and 1.5 cm at the inlet and

points 12 and 13 at 29 cm and 30.5 cm prove the end effect. What is of particular interest are the

several runs, 32 and 36 in figure 4-1, in which the inlet and exit temperatures are actually higher

than their adj acent measured temperatures inward from the ends. This indicates that there is an

end effect other than axial heat conduction influencing measured wall temperatures. This can be

explained by considering that the collars brazed onto the test section ends to apply a voltage will

not distribute the current absolutely evenly across the tube metal radius. The current flow will

distribute itself across the thickness of the metal over a finite distance, and will be concentrated

near the brazed collar at the ends. Therefore, the current density will be higher at the tube outer

wall where the collar is brazed and will therefore generate more heat towards the outer part of

the wall, where the thermocouple is attached.

The inlet and exit wall temperatures are lower than their adj acent wall temperatures for the

runs that have high wall temperatures, as runs 40, 42, 47, and 50 indicate, in spite of the

concentration of current near these end thermocouples. Comparing these trends with the rising

wall temperatures at the ends observed in runs 32 and 36 exemplify the relative impact of the

independent effects of axial heat conduction and current concentration. For runs with low wall

temperatures, the temperature rise due to current concentration is greater than the temperature

decrease due to axial heat conduction, with the net effect that the measured wall temperature

rises. The opposite net effect is evident in the high wall temperature runs. That is, axial heat

conduction has a greater effect on measured temperature than does current concentration.









Data Representation

The pressure data exhibited uneven trending, to varying degrees, in all runs. This

unevenness can present problems for a modeling algorithm using the pressure data to solve for

other flow conditions. Therefore, a smooth regression line was generated for each run to

represent the axial pressure profile. It was found that a third order least squares fit modeled all

runs very well, with correlation coefficients very near unity for most runs. Table (4-2) presents

these correlation coefficients, standard deviations, and normalized (to pressure drop across

length of tube) standard deviation.

In discussing the model results, momentum and energy balances are discussed in terms of

normalized values for each point. For example, the 'fractional pressure drop error' between two

points refers to the difference in the calculated pressure drop between the previous point and the

current point and the measured difference, divided by the measured difference. In the same way,

the 'fractional energy add error' refers to the difference in the calculated energy addition

between the previous point and the current point and the measured addition, divided by the

measured addition.

Problematic Runs

While run eight momentum and energy balances are satisfied, its void fraction is clearly

impossible. This is because, while the overall pressure drop of 76 kPa in run eight is not high,

the pressure gradient in the lower portion of the tube is extremely high, as shown in figure 4-3,

comparing runs seven and eight. These runs have similar system pressures and heat fluxes,

while their mass fluxes are 873 kg/m2-S in Tun SeVen and 536 kg/m2-S in run eight. For most

elevation intervals, there is a low and high void fraction solution for the associated pressure drop.

The pressure drop between the inlet and the 6.35 cm elevation in run eight does not allow for a

high void fraction solution given the energy addition and vapor temperature, leaving only the









low void fraction solution as an option. This is the only run in the data set in which this problem

arises. It is noteworthy that this run has always been unique and presented difficulties regardless

of the various modeling methods attempted. As will be shown in the results, run eight pressure

profile is significantly different from the predicted pressure profiles from this dissertation model

and the homogeneous equilibrium model, which happen to trend very closely with each other.

As a result of the obviously erroneous void profile, run eight will be excluded from further

analy si s.

Figure 4-4 shows that the fractional pressure drop and energy addition errors for run 14 are

numerous and relatively large. The algorithm cannot achieve such a low pressure drop for most

points given the vapor temperature and energy addition. Run 13 is very similar to 14 in mass

flow and system pressure, but with a heat flux of 703 kW/m2 VeTSes 425 kW/m2 for run 14. The

lower heat flux in run 14 will certainly cause lower pressure loss, but the overall pressure drop -

12 kPa verses 32 kPa is a little more than 1/3rd that of run 13, which seems to be a great

reduction given the relatively modest decrease in heat flux. The high system pressure of about

75% of the critical pressure should also mitigate the difference in pressure loss between the two

runs, since the difference is liquid and vapor density is not too great, and should thus be less

sensitive to the pressure loss associated with vaporization. Finally, the profile of the pressure

appears to have two inflection points, which, though possible, indicates a very complicated flow

structure. This reverse s-shape appears in other problem runs.

It is interesting to note that run 14 is the only run that is subcooled from an equilibrium

standpoint throughout the length of the heated test section. While the model appears to handle

other subcooled conditions adequately, the highly subcooled nature of run 14 may present a

special problem. As a result, run 14 will be excluded from the correlation process.









Tube 4 runs, 22-31, have by far the highest mass fluxes in the database. This is likely the

reason that four of these runs (22, 26, 29, and 30) exhibit low wall temperatures in the lower

portions of the test section. As discussed in chapter 3 and shown in figure 3-1 1, these runs are

associated with pre-CHF conditions and therefore will be excluded from consideration. Two

other runs, 28 and 31, produce poor energy balances. Thus, four runs (23, 24, 25, and 27) remain

for further consideration. As will be discussed later, these remaining four runs will be excluded

from the correlation process since the nature of their test conditions and resulting slips are

removed from the general body of data.

Three other runs (32, 36, 44) will also be excluded later, based on their high velocity slip

profiles that are inconsistent with all other slip profiles. This will be addressed later. While

there are occasional momentum and energy balance errors in other runs, it has been determined

that useful information can be obtained from them. Therefore, all other runs will be considered

further. Thus, after excluding pre-IFB runs (22, 26, 29, and 30), bad momentum and energy

balance runs (14, 28, and 3 1), and run eight with a bad void profile, there remains a total of 43

runs for further consideration.

It is determined from the above discussion that these runs that cannot be satisfactorily

processed by the model should be excluded from the analysis of results. This should not be

interpreted as a condemnation of the data from these runs, but rather an observation that the

model is not capable of resolving the data, and results using those data will be misleading.

Vapor Superheat

The effect of vapor superheat on the energy balance was investigated by modifying the

coefficient to the parenthesized term in Burmeister' s (1993) model, presented in equation 3-21.

Figure 4-5 presents the results using run 39, in which the term 'C' in the legend refers to this

coefficient. Coefficient values of 5/6th (Burmeister' s theoretical result), 2/3rd, and V/2 (TOSulting in









the commonly used mean film temperature) were tried. Increasing the vapor superheat in

general improves the overall energy balance. The decision to model the vapor superheat as the

mean temperature of the wall and saturation temperature was based upon this analysis. As

discussed in chapter 3, using the mean film temperature is consistent with the experimental

findings of Nijhawan et al. (1980).

Model Results

As figure 4-6 shows, the processing of data from these runs does not generate perfect

results. Momentum balance within 10% of measurement is achieved in all but 10 instances, and

to with 5% of measurement for all but 20 points. Energy balance is achieved within 10% of

measurement in all but 11 cases, and to within 5% of measurement for all but 44 cases. The

great maj ority of incremental pressure drops and energy additions for each run are well modeled.

Momentum and energy balances that fall outside the targeted 2% variance from measurement are

typically caused by steep changes in wall temperatures. The reason this causes problems lies in

the assumption that all of the vapor is at the mean temperature. If the wall temperature increases

markedly, then so too does the mean vapor enthalpy. The measured energy input to the flow is

less than the energy increase determined from the local pressure and mean vapor temperature.

The algorithm selects the energy solution closest to measurement from the quality/void fraction

domain generated by the momentum balance, but the energy balance error is still larger than the

targeted accuracy in these few cases. In these cases, the calculated quality does not change from

one point to the next.

Figure 4-7 presents the resulting void profiles from the model for the 43 runs. In general,

the void profiles rise steeply but smoothly. Where discontinuities occur, in general there are

steep increases in wall temperatures. In this figure, the four lowest void profiles correspond to










runs 23-25, and 27, all on tube 4. These are by far the highest remaining mass flux runs in the

culled data set.

Figure 4-8 presents the resulting velocity slip ratios from the model for the culled data set.

The trend of the slip profiles are in general smooth. The high mass flux runs 32, 36, and 44 on

tube 5 produce the highest slip ratios. The trends, while generally smooth for all runs, are

somewhat diverse.

Validation of Model Results

Figure 4-7 shows that an extremely steep void fraction build-up occurs in IFB, and departs

markedly from the relatively shallow build-up predicted by models such as that resulting from

the Lockhart-Martinelli parameter. These results are consistent with findings of Per Ottosen

(1980) in which void profiles in IFB conditions were measured using y-ray scattering. Ottosen

published the first known results from the use of y-ray absorption to measure void fraction in low

velocity IFB nitrogen. Figure 4-9 presents results from three of his many runs. It is apparent

that void fractions versus equilibrium quality (he made no attempt to quantify true mass quality)

rise very steeply. He observed the transition from IAFB to DF at void fractions between 80-

90%. All of his experiments were at approximately constant wall temperature conditions.

Additionally, all his data represent much lower mass fluxes than these hydrogen data. Perhaps

most importantly, the mass velocities were at least an order of magnitude lower than those in

these hydrogen data.

While a fine quantitative comparison is not made here due to the differences in

experimental conditions, a qualitative comparison is reasonable. It is apparent that extremely

rapid void fraction build-up is a characteristic of IFB.









Rohsenow and coworkers (Dougall and Rohsenow, 1963; Laverty and Rohsenow, 1967;

Forslund and Rohsenow, 1969) used nitrogen in their studies of IFB. In their work, they

determined the actual mass quality. They observed that the transition from IAF to DF occurred

at a mass quality of about 10%. Combining this observation with Ottosen' s of the void fraction

at transition, it can be concluded that void fractions of 80 90% at a mass quality of 10% are

typical. These experimental observations agree well with the results of this model.

Range of Validity

To avoid the momentum and energy balances of the high mass flux runs on tube 4, the

range of validity of this model has been reduced in terms of mass flux only. A total of eight runs

have been excluded from further analysis due to the inability of this model to reproduce the

pressure drop and energy balances. Forty-three runs remain. The remaining data for which the

balances are acceptable have the following range: pressures from 180 kPa to the critical pressure,

mass fluxes from 300 kg/m2-S to 2500 kg/m2-S, and heat fluxes from about 370 kW/m2 to about

2100 kW/m2.











Table 4-1. List of tube numbers, dimensions, and runs executed with the tubes.
Tube ref # Inner diameter Length Run numbers
cm cm
1 1.8 60.96 1-6
2 1.113 60.96 7-10
3 0.851 60.96 11-21
4 0.478 60.96 22-31
5 0.79 30.48 32-51












Table 4-2. Statistical analysis of pressure data show goodness of fit through R2, and relative
unevenness of data through normalized (by pressure drop across test section length)
standard deviation. Results are from least squares fit of third order.
oJ Norm a R2
set Pa a / P
1 248 9.05E-03 0.999

3 229 1.57E-02 0.998

5 232 1.90E-02 0.997

7 328 7.28E-03 1

9 2202 5.39E-02 0.981

11 229 1.09E-03 1

13 195 6.15E-03 1

15 232 2.28E-03 1

17 279 1.11E-03 1

19 288 1.95E-03 1

21 301 1.35E-03 1

23 408 1.76E-03 1

25 1697 6.24E-03 1

27 1907 9.48E-03 0.999

29 820 7.86E-03 1

31 301 2.76E-03 1

33 681 1.00E-02 0.999

35 466 1.21E-02 0.999
36 838 1.06E-02 0.999
37 1888 1.02E-02 0.999

39 1082 1.01E-02 0.999
40 875 7.31E-03 1
41 1050 9.19E-03 0.999
42 7040 7.32E-03 1
43 871 46.5E-03 1

46 2189 1.30E-02 0.999