Strategies to Enhance Fertility in Dairy Cattle during Summer including Use of Cryopreservation of in Vitro Produced Embryos

STRATEGIES TO ENHANCE FERTILITY IN DAIRY CATTLE DURING SUMMER
INCLUDING USE OF CRYOPRESERVATION OF IN VITRO PRODUCED
EMBRYOS















By

C. MOISES FRANCO


A THESIS PRESENTED TO THE GRADUATE SCHOOL
OF THE UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT
OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF
MASTER OF SCIENCE

UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA


2006


































Copyright 2006

by

C. Moises Franco





























This professional achievement reflects the sacrifice and guidance of my family especially
that of my mother, Mercedes Y. Vaca El-Hage, who laid the foundations with strong
pillars in my life.

This dissertation is dedicated to my beloved son Talyn Izaak Franco Benton and
astonishing father Antonio Vicente Franco Monasterio (Jf) for their endless love, support
and most important, inspiration.






"EL HOMBRE SE AUTORREALIZA EN LA MISMA MEDIA EN QUE SE
COMPROMETE AL CUMPLIMIENTO DEL SENTIDO DE SU VIDA"

Victor Frankl
(1905-1997)
















ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

This thesis would not have been possible without the enthusiasm, knowledge,

guidance, tenacity, and, perhaps most importantly faith that I received from my academic

advisor, Peter J. Hansen. From the very first interview to the last queries on research

accomplishments and career plans, he was always eager to entertain my ideas in hope that

I fulfilled my dreams) and become successful. I was not sure I could handle an

undertaking of such a magnitude, but was able to thanks to his consistent effort and true

desire to keep me on track.

I would like to extend my sincere appreciation to my committee member Dr. Karen

Moore, for her insight and willingness to help me academically without fail and regards

to time. Despite having other maj or responsibilities, Dr. Carlos Risco was willing to help

whenever asked. I thank him for his assistance and especially for the desire to help me

learn to palpate. Thanks are also extended to Dr. Alvin Warnick for his advice and

suggestions for improving my research proj ects and academic training. I would also like

to thank Dr. Joel Yelich for his teaching, support, and enthusiasm while providing me

with ideas that can help me achieve my goals.

Special thanks are extended to my family for encouraging me to seek for myself a

demanding and meaningful education. This thesis could not have taken place without that

precious gift.

Most sincere appreciation is also due to to my colleague and friend Dr. Rocio M.

Rivera, whose willingness to assist me in my early stages as a master's student helped to









kindle my interest in this exploration. I would not have gotten this far if it was not for her

unique and excellent training doing IVF. Dr. Zvi Roth was an inspirational friend whose

passion for science was transmitted to me. He also expressed his kindness and love

towards my son. I also thank Dr. Joel Hernandez for his support, friendship, and

guidance.

Thanks are given to Maria B. Padua for her assistance with the completion of this

manuscript and Luis Augusto Castro e Paula. Their unconditional friendship and help at

any given time is sincerely appreciated. I am grateful to Dean Jousan for making the

time to proofread my writings throughout the years and for his assistance in various

research experiments. Special thanks go to Amber Brad for her personality and joy that

helped the lab be united. Best of all has been my colleague and friend Jeremy Block for

his patience, expertise and engaging conversations that helped develop in me new

dreams. In addition, he always remained motivated throughout my transfer experiments.

I also would like to thank Central Packing Co. management and personnel at

Center Hill, FL, for providing the ovaries used for various experiments and William

Rembert for his assistance in collecting these ovaries. Special thanks go to Mary Russell

and Elise Griffin, for their assistance at the University of Florida Dairy Research Unit. I

thank Luther White and Mark Saulter of Hilltop Dairy, R.D. Skelton and Mathew Steed

of Levy County Dairy, and Mauricio Franco and Faby Grisel of Sausalito Dairy for

cooperation and assistance with the proj ects. And last but not least, I would like to thank

Todd Bilby, Osiloam Gomez, Reinaldo Cooke, Patrick Thompson, Saban Tekin, and

Paolette Soto.




















TABLE OF CONTENTS


IM Le

ACKNOWLEDGMENT S .............. .................... iv

LIST OF TABLES ............_ ..... ..__ ..............ix...


LI ST OF FIGURE S .............. ...............x.....

AB STRAC T ................ .............. xi


CHAPTER

1 REVIEW OF LITERATURE ..............._ ...............1.......... .....


Infertility in Modern Dairy Cattle............... .. .... ..............
Causes for the Decline in Fertility in Dairy Cattle .............. ...............2.....
Milk Yield .............. ........ ...............
Milk yield and energy balance .............. ...............3.....
Milk yield and endocrine milieu .............. ...............5.....
Milk yield and heat stress ................. ...............6............ ...
Milk yield and diseases ........................ ...............9
Milk yield, estrus detection, and fertility .............. ...............10....
Changes in Herd Size as a Factor in Reduced Fertility ................. ................. .11
Inbreeding ................... ...... .. ...... ........ ... ..... ..........1
Strategies to Improve Fertility in Lactating Dairy Cattle .................. ............... .....12
Treatment with Bovine Somatotropin (bST) to Enhance Fertility ......................13
Treatment with GnRH to Delay Luteolysis............. ... .................1
Increase in the Size of the Preovulatory Follicle to Generate a Larger Corpus
Luteum ............_.. ......_ ...... ............... 17.
Induction of an Accessory Corpus Luteum .........._.._ ....._.. ........._.._....19
Progesterone Supplementation .............. ...............20....
Inhibition of Luteolysis .............. ...............21....
Nutritional Strategies............... ........ .........2
Fat feeding to improve energy balance .............. ...............22....
Admini strati on of anti oxi dants ................. ...............25........... ..
Crossbreeding ................. ...............26.......... ......
Embryo Transfer............... ............ ... ... .......2
Limitations to Optimal Pregnancy Rates Using IVP TET .............. ..............28
Cryopreservation of IVP Embryos ...........__......_ ....__ ................30
Summary and Obj ectives of the Thesis ................. ...............31........... ..











2 EFFECTIVENESS OF ADMINISTRATION OF GONADOTROPIN
RELEASING HORMONE AT DAY 11, 14 OR 15 AFTER ANTICIPATED
OVTULATION FOR INCREASING FERTILITY OF LACTATING DAIRY
COWS AND NON-LACTATING HEIFERS .............. ...............34....

Introducti on ................. ...............34.................
M materials and M ethods ............... .... ......... ........................3
Experiment 1 GnRH Administration at Day 11 after Anticipated Ovulation
in Heifers Subj ected to Timed Artifieial Insemination during Heat Stress .....3 5
Experiment 2 GnRH Administration at Day 11 after Anticipated Ovulation
in Lactating Cows Subj ected to Timed Artifieial Insemination ....................37
Experiment 3 GnRH Administration at Day 14 after Anticipated Ovulation
in Lactating Cows Subj ected to Timed Artifieial Insemination ....................3 8
Experiment 4 GnRH Administration at Day 14 after Anticipated Ovulation
in Lactating Cows Subj ected to Timed Artifieial Insemination During Heat
Stress ................ ..... ..... ...... ...__ ..... ... .. .. .. ...........3
Experiment 5 GnRH Administration at Day 14 or Day 15 after Detected
Estrus............... ...............40
Statistical Analysis .............. ...............40....
R e sults................ ........... .... ..... ..__ ... ... .. .. ... ... .........4
Experiment 1 GnRH Administration at Day 11 after Anticipated Ovulation
in Heifers Subj ected to Timed Artifieial Insemination During Heat Stress ....42
Experiment 2 GnRH administration at Day 11 after Anticipated Ovulation
in Lactating Cows Subj ected to Timed Artifieial Insemination ....................42
Experiment 3 GnRH Administration at Day 14 after Anticipated Ovulation
in Lactating Cows Subj ected to Timed Artifieial Insemination ....................43
Experiment 4 GnRH Administration at Day 14 after Anticipated Ovulation
in Lactating Cows Subj ected to Timed Artifieial Insemination During Heat
Stress ................ ..... ..... ...... ... .. .. .. ................4
Experiment 5 GnRH Administration at Day 14 or Day 15 after Detected
E strus. ............... .... ............ .. ..... .. .............4
Overall Effectiveness of GnRH Treatment as Determined by Meta-Analysis....44
Discussion ........._..._. ...._ ... ...............44.....

3 EFFECT OF TRANSFER OF ONE OR TWO IN VITRO-PRODUCED
EMBRYOS AND POST-TRANSFER ADMINISTRATION OF
GONADOTROPIN RELEASING HORMONE ON PREGNANCY RATES OF
HEAT- STRES SED DAIRY CATTLE .....__.....___ ..........._ ...........5

Introducti on ........... __... ... ._ ...............52...
M materials and M ethods .............. ..... .............. ...... .......5
Experiment 1 Single or Twin Transfer of IVP Embryos into Crossbred
D airy R ecipients............ ..... .... ..........................5
Experiment 2 Administration of GnRH on Day 11 after Anticipated
Ovulation in Lactating Recipients that Received an IVP Embryo ..................57
Statistical Analysis .............. ...............59....
Re sults................. ...............60._ ___.......












Experiment 1 Single or twin transfer of IVP embryos ................. ................60
Pregnancy and calving rates ............... ....._ ....._ ............6
Characteristics of gestation, parturition, and calves.. .................. .................61
Experiment 2 Administration of GnRH on Day 11 after Anticipated
Ovul ati on ........._..... ...._... ...............62....
Discussion ........._..... ...._... ...............62.....


4 EFFECTS OF HYALURONIC ACID IN CULTURE AND CYTOCHALASIN B
TREATMENT BEFORE FREEZING ON SURVIVAL OF CRYOPRESERVED
BOVINE EMBRYO S PRODUCED IN VITRO ......____ ........ ...............72


Introducti on ............ .......__ ...............72...
M materials and M ethods .............. ...............73....

Embryo Production.................. .. .............7
Experimental Design and Embryo Manipulation ......____ ...... ...__...........74
Cryopreservation .............. ..... .. .............7
Thawing and Determination of Survival .............. ...............76....
Statistical Analysis .............. ...............76....
Re sults............ __.. ... ...._ ... ... .._ ... .......7
Effect of Hyaluronic Acid on Embryonic Development ..........._. ................... 77
Survival after Cryopreservation .............. ...............77....
Discussion ............ ..... .._ ...............78...


5 GENERAL DI SCU SSION ............_...... .__ ............... 2....


LIST OF REFERENCES ............_ .......__ ...............91...


BIOGRAPHICAL SKETCH ............_...... .__ ...............123...

















LIST OF TABLES


Table pg

2-1 Descriptive statistics, adjusted odds ratio (AOR) estimates, and 95% Wald
confidence intervals (CI) for effect of GnRH administration at Day 11 after
anticipated ovulation and ovulation synchronization protocol on pregnancy rates
of heifers during heat stress. ...._.._.._ ... ..._.__ ....___ ......._............49

2-2 Descriptive statistics, adjusted odds ratio (AOR) estimates, and 95% Wald
confidence intervals (CI) for effect of GnRH administration at Day 11 after
anticipated ovulation and season of insemination on pregnancy rates of lactating
cows subj ected to timed artificial insemination. ..........__......._ ..............50

2-3 Descriptive statistics, adjusted odds ratio (AOR) estimates, and 95% Wald
confidence intervals (CI) for effect of GnRH administration at Day 14 after
anticipated ovulation and season of insemination on pregnancy rates of lactating
cows subj ected to timed artificial insemination. ..........__......._ ..............50

2-4 Descriptive statistics, adjusted odds ratio (AOR) estimates, and 95% Wald
confidence intervals (CI) for effect of GnRH administration at Day 14 after
anticipated ovulation and Days in milk (<150 d vs > 150) at insemination on
pregnancy rates of lactating cows subj ected to timed artificial insemination
during heat stress. .........._ __..... ._ ...............51...

3-1 Effect of recipient type and number of embryos transferred per recipient on
pregnancy rates and losses. ............. ...............68.....

3-2 Effect of recipient type and number of embryos transferred per recipient on
characteristics of pregnancy and parturition. ................ .............. ........ .....69

3-3 Effect of recipient type and number of embryos transferred per recipient on
characteristics of calves born. ............. ...............70.....

4-1 Effect of hyaluronic acid added at day 5 after insemination on production of
blastocysts at day 7 and 8 after insemination. ............. ...............81.....

4-2 Effect of culture in hyaluronic acid and treatment with cytochalasin B on
survival after cryopreservation. ............. ...............81.....















LIST OF FIGURES


Finure pg

1-1 Rolling herd average (RHA, kg milk per lactation), calving interval (CI), and
services per conception (SPC) for 143 dairy herds continuously enrolled in the
Raleigh DHIA record system from 1970 to 1999. ............ .....................3

1-2 Temporal changes in first service pregnancy rate and annual average milk
production from high-producing Holstein-Friesian dairy herds in north-eastern
Spain. Data for pregnancy rate were recorded in the cool (October April
months) and warm season (May-September months). ........... ......................3

3-1 Maximum (open circles) and minimum (closed circles) daily air temperatures
and relative humidities (RH) during the experiments. .............. ....................7
















Abstract of Thesis Presented to the Graduate School
of the University of Florida in Partial Fulfillment of the
Requirements for the Degree of Master of Science

STRATEGIES TO ENHANCE FERTILITY IN DAIRY CATTLE DURING SUMMER
INCLUDING USE OF CRYOPRESERVATION OF IN VITRO PRODUCED
EMBRYOS


By

C. Moises Franco Vaca

May 2006

Chair: Peter J. Hansen
Major Department: Animal Sciences

There has been a precipitous decline in fertility of lactating dairy cows. In addition,

heat stress can further compromise fertility. The goals of this thesis were to 1) evaluate

strategies for enhancing fertility after artificial insemination using mid-cycle GnRH

treatment and 2) further develop embryo transfer using in vitro produced embryos as a

tool for increasing fertility. For the second obj ective, experiments tested whether

pregnancy rate could be improved by transfer of twin embryos and whether the

developmental competence of embryos after cryopreservation could be improved by

hyaluronic acid or cytochalasin B treatment.

A series of six experiments were conducted to test the efficacy of GnRH for

increasing fertility. Except for one experiment, in which GnRH administration at day 14

after insemination increased pregnancy rate, GnRH was without effect whether given at










day 11, 14 or 15 after insemination or at day 11 after anticipated ovulation in embryo

transfer recipients..

Neither unilateral transfer of two embryos nor administration of GnRH at Day 1 1

after anticipated ovulation improved pregnancy rates of dairy cattle exposed to heat

stress. Cytochalasin B treatment before freezing improved cryosurvival of bovine

embryos produced in vitro. In contrast, culture with hyaluronic acid was of minimal

benefit.

Taken together, GnRH treatment did not consistently increase pregnancy rates

when administered at Day 11-15 after insemination and is not recommended as a fertility-

enhancing treatment. Similarly, transfer of two embryos to the uterine horn ipsilateral to

the CL was not an effective method for increasing pregnancy rates in recipients. Transfer

of cryopreserved embryos may be enhanced by treatment of embryos with cytochalasin B

since this molecule increased in vitro survival, and it remains to be tested whether

survival of IVP embryos after vitrification can be improved by cytochalasin B treatment.















CHAPTER 1
REVIEW OF LITERATURE

Infertility in Modern Dairy Cattle

Fertility is defined as the ability of a cyclic animal to establish pregnancy and is an

important economic trait that affects herd productivity in dairy cattle (Pecsok et al., 1994;

Plaizier et al., 1998). Unfortunately, there has been a decline in fertility in dairy cows

over the last 10-40 years. Fertility, whether traditionally measured as conception rate

(number of pregnant animals divided by the number of inseminated animals) or herd

pregnancy rate (number of pregnant animals divided by the number of animals eligible to

be bred), has declined in North America (Butler, 1998), Ireland (Roche, 2000), Spain

(L6pez-Gatius, 2003), and the United Kingdom (Royal et al., 2000). Other important

reproductive measurements have changed during this time as well, including increases in

days to first service, days to conception, and calving interval (de Vries and Risco, 2005).

The magnitude of these changes in reproductive function over time is illustrated for data

from herds in the United States (Figure 1-1) and northeastern Spain (Figure 1-2).

The incidence of infertility of dairy cows has been correlated with changes in dairy

cattle physiology and improvements in genetic progress, nutrition, and management

practices. This literature review will seek to identify physiological causes for this

decrease in fertility and describe efforts to improve fertility.









Causes for the Decline in Fertility in Dairy Cattle

Milk Yield

The Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory of the United States Department of

Agriculture (USDA) has estimated the genetic trend for milk yield with an average of 37

kg/yr during the 1960s, 79 kg/yr during the 1970s, 102 kg/yr during the 1980s, and 116

kg/yr for the period from 1990 to 1996 (http://aipl.arsusda.gov; Hansen, 2000). It has

long been known that fertility is reduced in lactating cows as compared to non-lactating

heifers (Ron et al., 1984; Nebel and McGilliard, 1993). Given that milk yield has

increased over time as fertility has declined, the possibility must be considered that the

increase in milk yield is one reason that has contributed to the decreased fertility in dairy

cattle.

There are indications that the genetic correlation between female fertility and milk

production is antagonistic (Kadarmideen et al., 2000; Royal et al., 2002). In contrast,

Mahanna et al. (1979) suggested that there was no negative genetic correlation between

milk yield and reproduction because there was no difference in fertility among heifers

with different genetic abilities for milk yield. There may be an environmental effect of

milk yield on fertility, however. As described by Lucy (2001), the increase in milk yield

over the period from 1970 has been associated with a corresponding decrease in fertility

as measured by increased services per conception and calving interval (Figure 1-1).

According to Nebel and McGilliard (1993) there was little or no association of increased

milk yield compromising fertility prior to the 1970s (Gaines, 1927; Boyd et al., 1954;

Currie, 1956; Smith and Legates, 1962) but adverse effects of milk yield have been

correlated with reduced fertility in studies conducted since 1975 (Spalding et al., 1975;









Laben et al., 1982; Fonseca et al., 1983; Stevenson et al., 1983; Hillers et al., 1984;

Wiggans et al., 1987; Faust et al., 1988).

Using a data set of Holstein, Jersey, and Guernsey cows, it was found that 0.014

more services per conception were required for each additional 100 kg of 120-d milk for

Holsteins and 0.028 services per conception for Jersey and Guernsey cows (Olds et al.,

1979). Similarly, cows with the highest milk yield had the lowest first service conception

rate (Faust et al., 1988) or 90-d non-return rate (Al-Katanani et al., 1999) and highest

number of services (Faust et al., 1988). Days to first insemination and days open also

increased linearly as milk yield increased in Jersey dairy cattle (Fonseca et al., 1983).

Expression of estrus at first postpartum ovulation is less likely in cows with higher

milk production (Westwood et al., 2002). Some studies (Nielen et al., 1989; Kinsel et al.,

1998), but not others (Deluyker et al., 1991), correlate the incidence of twins to milk

yield. Amount of milk yield, however, was not correlated to increased incidence of

multiple ovulations (L6pez-Gatius et al., 2005b), yet the incidence of double ovulations

and twinning rate has increased in modern dairy cattle (Wiltbank et al., 2000). Taken

together, the associations of milk yield with reduced duration of estrus, increased days to

first insemination, increased number of inseminations per conception, reduced first

service conception rates, and reduced progesterone levels post-ovulation compromise

herd fertility.

Milk yield and energy balance

One way in which milk yield could affect fertility is through effects on energy

balance. A critical phase exists in the period following calving when dry matter intake

does not meet the increased metabolic demands of lactation, and as a result, the animal









enters a state classified as "negative energy balance" (NEB). During the period ofNEB,

body reserves of fat and protein are mobilized (Bauman and Currie, 1980; Butler and

Smith, 1989). An animal under NEB tends to have low body condition score (BCS), and

both NEB and low BCS are associated with low fertility (O'Callaghan, 1999; Butler,

2000; Pryce et al., 2001; Pushpakumara et al., 2003).

Energy deficiency reduces or impairs gonadotropin secretion, and as an animal

reaches this state around parturition, gonadotropin secretion to support follicular

development and ovulation is compromised and reproductive problems (i.e., cystic

ovaries) associated with onset of ovarian activity become prevalent (Zulu et al., 2002ab).

Growth hormone stimulates insulin-like growth factor 1 (IGF-1) production by the liver

(Jones and Clemmons, 1995), but during NEB growth hormone receptors are

downregulated in a process referred to as "Growth Hormone Resistance" (Donaghy and

Baxter, 1996). As milk production increases during early lactation and the cow is under

NEB, the liver becomes refractory to growth hormone because growth hormone receptors

are decreased (Vicini et al., 1991), and this result in reduced plasma concentration of

IGF-1 (Pell et al., 1993).

Follicular growth is stimulated by IGF-1 (Webb et al., 2004) and reduced plasma

concentrations of this growth factor are observed in cows with high milk yield (Rose et

al., 2004) and together are highly correlated to delayed return to ovarian cyclicity (Taylor

et al., 2004). After calving, cows with IGF-I concentrations greater than 50 ng/ml at first

service were 5 times more likely to conceive than those with lower concentrations

(Taylor et al., 2004).









The fact that high-producing cows have greater energetic demands for lactation

does not necessarily mean that these cows have greater NEB or low BCS. Staples et al.

(1990) found that low-producing cows had lower dry matter intake and were at a greater

risk for failure to conceive due to anestrus and infertility than high-producing cows. It

was observed that the low-producing group, classified as non-responders, sustained milk

production from 28% of body tissue reserve vs 15.9 and 16.7% in the early responder and

late responder groups. This interaction was confirmed when low-producing cows had

lost the most body weight during the first 2 weeks of lactation and were in the greatest

energy deficit (Staples et al., 1990).

Milk yield and endocrine milieu

Cows displaying greater milk production often have higher dry matter intakes

(Staples et al., 1990; Hommeida et al., 2004), which has been demonstrated to decrease

circulating progesterone concentrations in lactating (Hommeida et al., 2004) and non-

lactating cows (Rabiee et al., 2001). Acute feeding reduced circulating progesterone by

25% in pregnant cows (Vasconcelos et al., 2003). Lucy and co-workers (1998) found

that circulating progesterone was lower in cattle genetically selected for high milk

production.

Sangsritavong et al. (2002) demonstrated that lactating cows have a much greater

steroid metabolism than non-lactating cows. As a result, lactating cows may have larger

luteal tissue volume on the ovary (Sartori et al., 2002; Sartori et al., 2004) yet experience

lower circulating progesterone and estradiol concentrations than heifers and dry cows (De

la Sota et al., 1993; Wolfenson et al., 2004). There is evidence that low progesterone









secretion can compromise fertility in dairy cattle (Mann and Lamming, 1999) and an

increase in progesterone secretion may facilitate embryonic development.

Progesterone provides nourishment for the concepts via induction of secretion of

proteins and other molecules from the endometrium (Garrett et al., 1988a). Low

peripheral concentrations of progesterone are also associated with increased luteinizing

hormone (LH) pulses (Ireland and Roche, 1982) that can stimulate luteolytic signals in

favor of pregnancy failure. Skarzynski and Okuda (1999) reported that blocking the

progesterone receptor with a progesterone antagonist (onapristone) increased

prostaglandin F2a (PGF2a) prOduction by bovine luteal cells harvested from mid-cycle

corpora lutea (CL) (Days 8-12). In addition, it was revealed that the bovine corpus

luteum (CL) does not undergo apoptosis until progesterone production has declined

(Juengel et al., 1993; Rueda et al., 1995).

Milk yield and heat stress

One reason why milk yield might decrease fertility of lactating cows is because it

increases their susceptibility to heat stress. Infertility is a particular problem during heat

stress (Ingraham et al., 1974; Putney et al., 1989b; Al-Katanani et al., 1999) and air

temperatures as low as 27oC can induce hyperthemia in lactating dairy cows (Berman et

al., 1985). Cows exposed to elevated temperatures to induce heat stress experienced

reduced pregnancy rates (Dunlap and Vincent, 1971) and increased embryonic mortality

(Putney et al., 1988ab; Ealy et al., 1993). On the other hand, provision of cooling in the

summer increased pregnancy rates as compared to non-cooled cows (Stott et al., 1972;

Roman-Ponce et al., 1981; Ealy et al., 1994).









The ability to regulate body temperature during heat stress is exacerbated by

lactation because of the excess heat production. The increase in body temperature in

response to heat stress is greater for lactating cows than heifers (Cole and Hansen, 1993)

and greater for high-producing cows than low-producing cows (Berman et al., 1985).

Data collected on fertility at first service from 8124 Holstein cows located in South

Georgia as well as North and South Florida support the idea that a high level of milk

production reduces fertility of lactating cows. When cows were grouped according to

mature equivalent milk yield, there was a milk yield class x month of breeding interaction

that resulted from the fact that the duration and magnitude of summer infertility increased

as milk yield increased (Al-Katanani et al., 1999).

Heat stress before, shortly after, and on the day of breeding is associated with

reduced fertility. Heat stress can compromise fertility throughout various reproductive

processes such as oocyte developmental competence (Picton et al., 1998; McNatty et al.,

1999) since the oocyte becomes sensitive to damage throughout the various stages of

follicular growth (Badinga et al., 1993). Indeed, follicular steroidogenesis, follicular

dynamics and altered concentrations of FSH and inhibin become altered in response to

heat stress (Badinga et al., 1994; Wolfenson et al., 1997; Roth et al., 2000). During heat

stress sperm can be damaged after insemination due to the generation of reactive oxygen

species (Ishii et al., 2005) and embryonic development can be compromised directly

(Monty et al., 1987). Not surprisingly the heat stress problem is multifactorial (Hansen et

al., 2001).

Heat stress of superovulated cows at day 1 after breeding reduced the proportion of

embryos that were blastocysts at day 8 after breeding, but heat stress on day 3, 5 or 7









after breeding did not affect subsequent embryonic development (Ealy et al., 1993).

Superovulated heifers experienced a high percentage of retarded embryos recovered on

day 7 after insemination after exposure to high temperature and humidity at the onset of

estrus for 10 h (Putney et al., 1989a). In another study heat stress was induced in

Holstein heifers by submitting them from day 1 to day 7 after estrus to 42oC for 7 h

(treatment) or 30oC for 16 h (control) and results obtained revealed more retarded

embryos with degenerate blastomeres on the day of recovery (20.7% vs. 51.5%,

respectively; Putney et al., 1988a).

One cause for the observed reduction in reproductive performance under heat stress

conditions is steroidogenic capacity and its effects on oocyte function (Roth et al., 2001;

Al-Katanani et al, 2002b; Roth and Hansen, 2004). Under heat stress, low estradiol

concentration in the follicular fluid of dominant follicles involves reduced aromatase

activity in the granulosa cells (Badinga et al., 1993) and reduced androstenedione

production by theca cells (Wolfenson et al., 1997). Although earlier studies were

inconsistent in demonstrating that plasma concentrations of estradiol are reduced under

heat stress (no change- Gwazdauskas et al., 1981; increase Rosenberg et al., 1982;

decrease Gwazdauskas et al., 1981), recent work points toward heat stress resulting in

lower estradiol concentrations in the follicular fluid (Badinga et al., 1993; Wolfenson et

al., 1995; Roth, 1998; Wilson et al., 1998ab).

Heat stress also has been reported to decrease (Rosenberg et al., 1982, Younas et

al., 1993; Howell et al., 1994), increase (Abilay et al., 1975; Roman-Ponce et al., 1981;

Trout et al., 1998), or have no effect (Wise et al., 1988; Wolfenson et al., 1995) on

peripheral concentrations of progesterone. Elevated temperatures in culture can directly









influence endometrium explants by increasing PGF2a Secretion (Putney et al., 1988c;

Malayer and Hansen, 1990) and from days 8-16 of pregnancy can reduce the size of the

embryo at day 17 (Biggers et al., 1987).

A retrospective survey involving 12,711 lactations from high-yielding dairy herds

in northeast Spain demonstrated that milk yield per cow increased from 1991-2000

(L6pez-Gatius, 2003; see Figure 2). For each 1000 kg increase in average milk yield in

the warm period, there was a decrease of 6% in pregnancy rate, and 7.6% in cyclicity,

and an increase of 8% in the incidence of inactive ovaries. During the cool period,

however, there was no change in fertility over time. Thus, the continual increase in milk

yield might have reduced fertility in Spain, at least, by exacerbating effects of heat stress.

Milk yield and diseases

Increased incidence of certain diseases has been associated with elevated milk

yield. High somatic cell score and clinical mastitis (Schukken et al., 1990; Barkema et

al., 1998; Chassagne et al., 1998; Fleischer et al., 2001); lameness (Green et al., 2002);

cystic ovarian disease (Fleischer et al., 2001; L6pez-Gatius et al., 2002); milk fever

(Fleischer et al., 2001); and acute metritis (Kelton et al., 1998) are all correlated with

milk yield.

Compared to non-mastitic herd-mates, high producing cows were at a greater risk

of developing clinical mastitis (Grahn et al., 2004). Number of days to conception,

artificial inseminations per conception and number of days to first artificial insemination

(AI) were significantly greater for cows with clinical mastitis (Barker et al., 1998), and

may affect embryonic survival when occurring after insemination (Soto et al., 2003).

According to Jousan et al., (2005) an elevated somatic cell count score among lactating









females influenced mid-to-late fetal loss (represented as occurring after day 70 to 90 of

gestation) and mastitis has been reported to affect pregnancy loss during the period of

embryonic (Chebel et al., 2004) and fetal development (Risco et al., 1999; Santos et al.,

2004a).

High yielding cows had an increased likelihood of becoming lame (Green et al.,

2002) and cows that had been treated for lameness had a negative influence on pregnancy

to Birst insemination and numbers of inseminations per service period (Petersson et al.,

2005). Similarly, non-lame cows were more likely to conceive at first service than lame

cows and lameness within the first 30 days after calving was associated with reduced

pregnancy rates at first AI and a higher number of services per conception (Hernandez et

al., 2001; Melendez et al., 2003). In a meta-analysis of several published papers, leg

problems were associated with an average increase of 12 days to conception (Fourichon

et al., 2000).

Cows that develop cysts remain infertile as long as this condition persists and early

spontaneous cyst recovery was negatively correlated with milk yield (L6pez-Gatius et al.,

2002). Similarly, elevated milk yield increased the risk of cows developing cysts (L6pez-

Gatius et al., 2002) and days from metritis occurrence to first AI is also correlated to

infertility (Loeffler et al., 1999). Milk yield in the current lactation is also correlated with

incidence of milk fever (Fleischer et al., 2001) and this disease reduces fertility (Chebel

et al., 2004).

Milk yield, estrus detection, and fertility

Milk yield may affect fertility indirectly by reducing the ability to accurately detect

estrus. An antagonistic relationship between increased milk production and days to first









visual estrus has already been reported. According to LC~pez et al. (2004), duration,

standing events, intensity (determined by the number of standing events per hour), and

standing time were reduced for high-producing cows as compared to low producers.

Similarly, Harrison et al. (1990) reported that elevated milk yield was correlated to a

longer period of estrus suppression. Westwood et al., (2002) indicated that high genetic

merit for milk yield influenced significantly the chance a cow showed weak signs of

estrus as compared to low milk producing cows.

Cows with elevated milk yield also had reduced circulating estradiol concentrations

on the day of estrus expression and shorter duration of estrus despite having larger

preovulatory follicle diameters (LC~pez et al., 2004).

Changes in Herd Size as a Factor in Reduced Fertility

Increased milk yield is not the only change in dairy farming over the last 50 years

and some of these other changes could also contribute to decreased fertility. One major

change has been the trend towards large farms. In a review, Lucy et al. (2001) cited data

from the USDA National Agricultural Statistics Services that nearly 30% of all dairy

farms in the United States have more than 500 cows. In addition, Stahl et al. (1999)

reported that the expansion of dairy herds comes in large part through the purchase of

first-lactation cows. Thus, as Lucy et al. (2001) pointed out, these more infertile

primiparous cows (Stahl et al., 1999) may have represented an increasingly larger

percentage of the herd as dairy herds have expanded over the last 10-40 years. The

importance of changes in herd size as a cause for infertility have been questioned by de

Vries and Risco (2005) who found no clear association with reproductive function.

Nevertheless, as the herd size is increased one would expect that the likelihood that

it becomes harder for accurately detecting estrus becomes a challenge because factors









associated with herd size such as the surface (concrete floor) on which the cow stands

will reduce the preponderance of cows displaying estrus activity (Britt et al., 1986;

O'Connor and Senger, 1997).

Inbreeding

Inbreeding represents increased frequency of identical alleles at a gene locus and

the inbreeding percent is a measure for the genes of an individual that are identical by

descent (Wright, 1922; Falconer, 1981). It is generally considered that reproductive

function declines when inbreeding levels in a population rise above 6.25% (Hansen et al.,

2005). Increased degree of inbreeding as the result of use of AI could explain some of

the declines in fertility experienced by dairy cattle because inbreeding coefficients have

increased in all the maj or U. S. dairy breeds. Estimates of inbreeding in the U. S. dairy

population are near 5% currently (Short et al., 1992; Wiggans et al., 1995; Young et al.,

1996; Hansen, 2000; Wall et al., 2005) and increasing at a constant rate of about 0. 1% per

year for U. S. Holsteins (Hansen et al., 2005). At an average of 5%, it is likely that many

dairy cows have inbreeding coefficients above 6.25% (Hansen et al., 2005).

Thompson et al. (2000ab) found calving intervals to increase by 12 and 17 d for

Jersey and Holsteins cows, respectively, with levels of inbreeding >10%. Similarly,

inbreeding had pronounced negative effects on fertility at higher levels (10%) of

inbreeding (Wall et al., 2005). In another study, animals with an inbreeding coefficient

>9% had fewer transferable embryos following superovulation than animals with a lower

inbreeding coefficient (Alvarez et al., 2005).

Strategies to Improve Fertility in Lactating Dairy Cattle

Four general approaches to improve reproductive function in dairy cattle have

been developed. The first is to regulate the timing of ovulation using gonadotropin









releasing hormone (GnRH) and PGF2 O utilized in timed AI (TAI) programs. The

advantage of this approach is that this program maximizes the number of animals

inseminated and allows inseminations to be made at some pre-planned time to eliminate

the need for estrus detection. Pioneering studies (Thatcher et al., 1989; Twagiramungu et

al., 1992; Wolfenson et al., 1994) were able to synchronize estrus effectively, however,

subsequent studies at the University of Florida (Schmitt et al., 1996a) and University of

Wisconsin (Pursley et al., 1995) led to the development of the Ovsynch TAI program and

the demonstration that good pregnancy rates can be achieved (Thatcher et al., 2001;

Thatcher et al., 2002). Although this approach is an effective one and is widely used in

dairy herds, it involves regulation of events occurring before conception and is beyond

the scope of the present review. The second approach is to use information regarding the

hormonal basis for establishment of pregnancy and signaling between the maternal and

embryonic units during early pregnancy as the basis for pharmacological treatments to

improve embryonic survival. Failure of essential biochemical dialogue between the

concepts and the maternal unit undoubtedly contributes to embryonic mortality and

termination of pregnancy (Spencer et al., 1996; Spencer and Bazer, 2002). The third

approach has been to regulate the nutrition of the dairy cow to improve energy balance or

to provide specific nutrients that favor establishment and maintenance of pregnancy.

Finally, recent work has focused on use of embryo transfer to bypass early embryonic

death and perhaps coupled with crossbreeding may become an important alternative since

Holsteins have become more inbred (Hansen et al., 2005).

Treatment with Bovine Somatotropin (bST) to Enhance Fertility

Circulating concentrations of IGF-I, glucose, and cholesterol are reduced in

lactating animals (de la Sota et al., 1993; Beam and Butler 1997). Circulating









concentrations of IGF-I is influenced by nutrition (Adam et al., 1997) and closely related

to energy balance of the cow (Ginger et al., 1997; Beam and Butler, 1998; 1999). Present

in serum and in various tissues, IGF-I is produced mainly by the liver but other organs as

well (Murphy et al., 1987; Thissen et al., 1994). IGF-I regulates ovarian function in dairy

cattle (Breukink et al., 1998; Chase et al., 1998), is necessary for proper follicular

development in which a fully competent oocyte capable of inducing ovulation develops

(Lucy et al., 1992a), and is required for normal CL formation and function (Leeuwenberg

et al., 1996; Chase et al., 1998). Dairy cows that initiated estrous cyclicity during the

postpartum period had higher plasma IGF-I than anestrous cows (Thatcher et al., 1996),

cystic and inactive ovary or persistent CL cows (Zulu et al., 2002a).

Bovine somatotropin (bST) increases plasma concentrations of insulin, IGF-I, and

growth hormone (Bilby et al., 2004), perhaps by stimulating ovarian function especially

after IGF-1 plasma levels are reduced in lactating animals (de la Sota et al., 1993). In

addition, inj section of bST stimulates concepts growth by day 17 of pregnancy (Bilby et

al., 2004). Additional studies provided evidence that bST can improve pregnancy rates in

lactating cows (Moreira et al., 2000b; Morales-Roura et al., 2001; Santos et al., 2004b).

Superovulated donor cows that received bST treatment experienced reduced number of

unfertilized oocytes, increased number of embryos that developed to the blastocyst stage,

and increased number of transferable embryos (Moreira et al., 2002). Collectively, these

studies indicate that critical thresholds of GH and IGF-I concentrations are needed to

stimulate reproductive performance (Bilby et al., 2004).

Treatment with GnRH to Delay Luteolysis

The estrous cycle is characterized by 2, 3, and sometimes 4 waves of follicular

growth (Sirois and Fortune, 1988; Ginther et al., 1996). During the second half of the









luteal phase, development of an estrogenic follicle facilitates the luteolytic process via

secretion of estradiol. Non-pregnant cows have higher peripheral concentrations of

estradiol on days 16 and 18 after breeding compared to pregnant animals (Ahmad et al.,

1997). Thatcher et al. (1991) examined the largest and second largest follicles present on

day 17 after estrus in pregnant and cyclic dairy cows. In the cyclic cows, the largest

follicle had greater aromatase activity and contained more estradiol and less progesterone

in the follicular fluid than the second largest follicle. These relationships were reversed

in pregnant animals, which indicated an earlier recruitment of the third wave of follicular

development in the pregnant animal associated with delayed luteolysis and higher

pregnancy rates. That these follicles play an important role in luteolysis was shown by

Villa-Godey et al. (1985), who reported that electrocautery to destroy large follicles was

associated with an extension of the estrous cycle.

Estradiol is now known to be one of three hormones that control uterine secretion

of PGF2,, With progesterone and oxytocin also being involved. Pulsatile release of PGF2,

from the luminal epithelium of the endometrium is stimulated via oxytocin (Roberts and

McCracken, 1976; Silvia and Taylor, 1989; Milvae and Hansel, 1980). Progesterone and

estradiol regulate this process because estradiol induces formation of oxytocin receptors

(Silvia and Taylor, 1989; Zingg et al., 1995; Robinson et al., 2001) after progesterone

exposure (Ginther, 1970; Garrett et al., 1988b; Lafrance and Goff, 1988). While

progesterone initially suppresses PGF2, Secretion by blocking oxytocin receptors during

the early and mid-luteal phase of the estrous cycle, the endometrium becomes responsive

to oxytocin and progesterone receptors become down regulated as the estrous cycle

progresses (Lafrance and Goff, 1988; Spencer and Bazer, 1995).










Delaying luteolysis might improve pregnancy rate by allowing embryos more time

to produce sufficient quantities of interferon-z (IFN- z). Eliminating or decreasing

estradiol production from the dominant follicle during the critical period of early

pregnancy could be one strategy to improve pregnancy establishment (Thatcher et al.,

2000; Binelli et al., 2001). One approach for doing this is to use GnRH to regulate

follicular function.

Gonadotropin releasing hormone is a decapeptide that plays a central role in

regulating reproductive processes. Release of GnRH from the hypothalamus occurs in a

pulsatile fashion and can be regulated by various internal and external signals.

Hypothalamic GnRH is synthesized in cell bodies of neurosecretory neurons, and is

transported to and released from the median eminence into the hypothalamic-

hypophyseal portal system (Loucopoulos and Ferin, 1984). GnRH has its primary effects

at the pituitary gonadotrope and stimulates the pulsatile release of the gonadotropins

luteinizing hormone (LH) and follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) into the peripheral

circulation (Chenault et al., 1990). Two potential gonadotropin responsive tissues within

the ovary are the CL and the follicle. LH release induces ovulation or luteinization of

large ovarian follicles present at the time of treatment (Thatcher and Chenault, 1976).

One strategy tested for increasing pregnancy rate is to inject GnRH or GnRH

analogues at day 11-14 after estrus to increase progesterone secretion (Willard et al.,

2003) and delay luteolysis (Macmillan and Thatcher, 1991), thereby increasing the

chance for an embryo to initiate its own antiluteolytic mechanism. Inj section of GnRH at

this time can lead to decreased estrogen secretion (Rettmer et al., 1992a; Mann and









Lamming, 1995a) in an action that likely involves luteinization of the dominant follicle

(Thatcher et al., 1989; Rettmer et al., 1992a; Ryan et al., 1994).

Improvement of fertility has been seen by administration of GnRH or its analogues

at day 1 1-14 in nulliparous beef heifers (Rettmer et al., 1992b) and lactating dairy cows

(Macmillan et al., 1986; Lajili et al., 1991; Sheldon and Dobson, 1993; Drew and Peters,

1994; Willard et al., 2003; L6pez-Gatius et al., 2005a). In contrast to these positive

results, there was no favorable effect of similar treatments of GnRH or GnRH analogues

on pregnancy rates in other studies (Jubb et al., 1990; Stevenson et al., 1993; Ryan et al.,

1994; Bartolome et al., 2005). In a meta-analysis of published results, Peters et al. (2000)

concluded that the overall effect of GnRH administration between day 11 and 14 after

anticipated ovulation was positive but that results were not consistent between studies.

Increase in the Size of the Preovulatory Follicle to Generate a Larger Corpus
Luteum

As mentioned earlier, high-yielding dairy cows are more likely to have lower

circulating concentrations of progesterone throughout the estrous cycle than cows with

lower milk yields because of increased rate of progesterone catabolism (Lucy et al., 1998;

Vasconcelos et al., 1999). Given the importance of progesterone concentration for

embryonic survival (Man and Lamming, 2001), efforts have been made to increase

progesterone secretion in cows. One possible effect of mid-cycle treatment with GnRH is

to increase progesterone secretion (Schmitt et al., 1996b; Willard et al., 2003). Another

approach for increasing progesterone concentrations has been to regulate the size of the

preovulatory follicle to affect subsequent CL function.

Optimum differentiation and growth rate of the CL varies according to the duration

and amplitude of the ovulatory LH surge such that inhibition of LH release preceding the










preovulatory surge of LH resulted in development of a smaller CL in diameter (Quintal-

Franco et al., 1999). Induced ovulation of small follicles resulted in a smaller CL and

reduced secretion of progesterone than when a larger follicle ovulated (Vasconcelos et

al., 2001). In another study (Perry et al, 2005), regression analysis indicated that

pregnancy rate for cows with induced ovulation with an ovulating follicle of 14.5 mm

was higher than for cows ovulating follicles <10.3 mm in diameter. It was further

revealed that 39% of cows that lost their pregnancy had ovulatory follicles <11 mm in

diameter. Among cows that ovulated spontaneously, however, pregnancy rates at day 27

and 68 were independent of ovulatory follicle size (Perry et al., 2005). In contrast to this

result, Vasconcelos et al (1999) found that the group of cows ovulating larger follicles

had lower pregnancy rates on day 28 and 98 after AI and higher pregnancy loss between

these times.

Administration of GnRH just prior to or at the time of the LH surge causes an

amplified preovulatory surge ofLH (Lucy and Stevenson, 1986; Yoshioka et al., 2001).

Inj section of GnRH at or near the time of estrus increased the proportion of large luteal

cells in the CL on day 10 of the estrous cycle (Mee et al., 1993), peripheral progesterone

concentrations during the first 7 days of the estrous cycle (Lucy and Stevenson, 1986),

and increased pregnancy rates in repeat breeding cows (Stevenson et al., 1990; Mee et al.,

1993).

Ullah et al. (1996) observed that GnRH treatment at estrus in dairy cows improved

pregnancy rates and increased peripheral progesterone concentration. Conversely, GnRH

administered to lactating dairy cows at the time of AI did not affect pregnancy rates

(Ryan et al., 1994). Similarly, Mee et al. (1990) concluded that GnRH treatment at 1 h or









12 to 16 h after first detected estrus did not improve pregnancy rates at first service. Mee

et al. (1990) mentioned that 16 studies in the literature suggest an overall advantage in

pregnancy rate of 6 percentage points (53 vs. 59%) or an 1 1% improvement for cows

receiving GnRH treatment at the time of AI or up to 6 h preceding AI.

Induction of an Accessory Corpus Luteum

Progesterone concentrations following ovulation have been positively correlated to

volume of uterine secretions (Garrett et al., 1988a), concepts development (Garrett et

al., 1988a; Mann et al., 1996), the embryos ability to secrete IFN-z (Kerbler et al., 1997;

Mann et al., 1998), embryo viability for subsequent survival (Stronge et al., 2005), and

perhaps most importantly conception rates (Hansel, 1981; Fonseca et al., 1983; Shilton et

al., 1990; Larson et al., 1997). One possible approach to increasing progesterone

secretion has been to induce formation of an accessory CL by administering GnRH or

hCG, LH or their analogues at a time when the first wave dominant follicle is present

after ovulation (metestrus) (Rajamahendran and Sianangama, 1992; Schmitt et al., 1996b;

Santos et al., 2001). Santos et al. (2001) reported that hCG treatment on d 5 of a

synchronized estrous cycle induced an accessory CL in 86.2% of treated cows, increased

plasma progesterone by 5 ng/ml, and increased conception rates on day 28 from 38.7% to

45.8% and on day 90 of pregnancy from 3 1.9% to 38.4%. Lactating dairy cows treated

with GnRH on d 5 (Willard et al., 2003) and hCG on day 7 (Raj amahendran and

Sianangama, 1992) or day 4 in heifers (Breuel et al., 1989) reported successful accessory

CL formation and an increase in conception rates and pregnancy rate.

Besides stimulating luteal tissue formation, treatment of cows to induce ovulation

of the first wave dominant follicle with GnRH or GnRH analogues also reprograms

follicular growth to increase the proportion of estrous cycles composed of three follicular









waves as compared to two waves (Diaz et al., 1998). Such an effect could reduce the

probability that a large, highly estrogenic follicle is present during the critical period of

pregnancy recognition. Compared to animals with two-wave cycles, Holstein cows

(Townson et al., 2002) and beef cows (Ahmad et al., 1997) with a three-wave cycle had

higher conception rates and a longer luteal phase (Ginther et al., 1989).

Progesterone Supplementation

The ability of the concepts to secrete IFN-z is related to its developmental

progress and progesterone concentration of the pregnant female (Mann et al., 1999). Low

progesterone concentration in plasma as early as day 6 after insemination has been

implicated as a contributing factor for cows failing to conceive (Bulman and Lamming,

1978; Lukaszewska and Hansel, 1980; Kimura et al., 1987; Lamming and Darwash,

1995; Inskeep, 1995; Mann and Lamming, 1999; Hommeida et al., 2004). Enhanced

luteolytic signals also result from suboptimal progesterone concentrations after

insemination (Mann and Lamming, 1995b). Another approach to increase fertility of

lactating dairy cows has been to directly supplement cows with progesterone. A meta-

analysis of 17 studies revealed that progesterone supplementation after insemination

produced an overall improvement in conception rate of 5% and that the timing of

progesterone supplementation was a critical factor (Mann and Lamming, 1999). One

study revealed depressed conception rates when controlled internal drug releasing

(CIDR) devices containing progesterone were inserted in heifers on day 1 or day 2

following estrus (Van Cleef et al., 1989). In contrast, injection of progesterone (100 mg)

on day 1, 2, 3, and 4 of pregnancy advanced development of conceptuses to 14 days of

gestation in beef cows (Garrett et al., 1988a). These conceptuses had increased length

and secreted a greater array of proteins into medium following a 24 hour culture. When










progesterone supplementation was initiated beginning at day 10 of pregnancy, Macmillan

et al. (1991) found a slight decrease in pregnancy rate (-2.7%), Sreenan and Diskin,

(1983) obtained a small increase (4.3%), and Robinson et al. (1989) obtained a large

increase (29.3%) in pregnancy rate. Villarroel et al. (2004) found that first and second

lactation repeat-breeder Holstein cows were 3.26 times more likely to become pregnant

when cows received progesterone releasing intravaginal device (PRID 1.55g of

progesterone) on day 5 through 19 post-AI.

Inhibition of Luteolysis

The maintenance of a functional CL depends directly upon the intensity of

embryonic signals that attenuates endometrial secretion of PGF2a. Pregnancy fails if an

embryo does not produce sufficient amounts of IFN-z or if production is delayed until

after the critical time-period between days 14 and 17 when the luteolysis would otherwise

occur.

Intrauterine infusions of recombinant bovine IFN-z from days 14 to 24 of the

estrous cycle increased lifespan of the CL and duration of the estrous cycle (Meyer et al.,

1995). Further studies with a large number of cows needs to test whether this treatment

increases pregnancy rates. Co-transfer of embryonic vesicles to increase trophoblastic

signals has been reported to increase pregnancy rates in embryo transfer recipients

(Heyman et al., 1987). Administration of IFN-a by intramuscular injection, which can

also block luteolysis, decreased pregnancy rates in heifers (Barros et al., 1992) because

IFN-a has several adverse actions such as causing hyperthermia (Newton et al., 1990).

Administration of a prostanoid synthesis inhibitor could suppress the luteolytic

stimulus in early pregnancy. Injection of flunixin meglumine (a prostaglandin synthesis

inhibitor) neutralized oxytocin-induced PGF2a TeleaSe, reduced the frequency of short










cycles, and increased pregnancy rate from 33.3% in oxytocin challenged cows to 80% in

oxytocin treated cows that received a flunixin meglumine inj section (Lemaster et al.,

1999). In another study, effects of flunixin meglumine on pregnancy rate were farm or

location dependent (Purcell et al., 2005). Together, these results suggest that certain

conceptuses are unable to inhibit uterine PGF2a Secretion and that reducing prostaglandin

synthesis and stimulating IFN-z secretion could improve pregnancy rates.

Nutritional Strategies

Dairy cows reach peak production on average within the first 4 to 6 weeks after

parturition. Unfortunately, feed and energy intake do not reach maximum levels until

approximately 10 12 weeks postpartum. The end result is a lactating cow with

insufficient nutritional requirements that enters a NEB status.

As mentioned before, energy balance is defined as the difference between energy

gain from feed intake minus the energy expenditure associated with maintenance of

physiological function, growth, and milk production (Staples et al., 1990). Several

studies have reported that negative energy status impaired reproductive performance

(Butler and Smith, 1989; Jorritsma et al., 2000). Different nutritional strategies to

improve energy balance or alter nutrient delivery to improve reproductive function are

described in this section.

Fat feeding to improve energy balance

Fats are glyceride esters of fatty acids that can have a direct effect on the

transcription of genes that encode proteins that are essential to reproductive events

(Mattos et al. 2000). Dietary fats typically increase concentrations of circulating

cholesterol, the precursor of progesterone (Grummer and Carroll, 1991). Ruminants fed









supplemental fat often have a slight increase in blood progesterone concentrations [see

Staples et al. (1998) for review]. Hawkins et al. (1995) suggested that the increase seen

in circulating progesterone when cows are fed supplemental fat was from a reduced rate

of clearance of progesterone rather than an increase in progesterone synthesis. Fat

supplementation has also been shown to stimulate programmed growth of a preovulatory

follicle (Lucy et al., 1993), total number of follicles (Lucy et al., 1991ab; Wehrman et al.,

1991; Thomas and Williams, 1996; Beam and Butler, 1997; Lammoglia, 1997), and size

of preovulatory follicles (Lucy et al., 1990, 1991a, 1993; Beam and Butler, 1997; Oldick

et al., 1997).

Garcia-Boj alil et al. (1998) reported that accumulated plasma progesterone from 0

to 50 days in milk (DIM) was greater, pregnancy rates improved, and energy status did

not change when cows were fed diets of 2.2% calcium salts of fatty acids (CSFA)

compared to non fat-supplemented cows. Similarly, Scott et al. (1995) fed CSFA at 0 or

450 g/d from 1 to 180 or 200 DIM and reported a tendency for CSFA to increase the

proportion of cows exhibiting standing estrus (71.4% vs. 65.6) and a reduction in the

proportion of cows with inactive ovaries.

Other studies have also found a beneficial effect of feeding supplemental fats on

fertility of lactating cows (Erickson et al., 1992; Sklan et al., 1994) while some studies

have found no beneficial effect. Although fertility results are inconsistent when cows

were evaluated after being fed supplemental fat, Staples et al. (1998) suggested that

positive effects (17 percentage unit improvement) are more often reported. When first AI

service and conception or pregnancy rate data was examined, ten studies (Schneider et

al., 1988; Bruckental et al., 1989; Sklan et al., 1989; Armstrong et al., 1990; Ferguson et









al., 1990; Sklan et al., 1991; Garcia-Bojalil, 1993; Scott et al., 1995; Burke et al., 1996;

Son et al., 1996) report an improvement (P < 0. 10) while two studies (Erickson et al.,

1992; Sklan et al., 1994) revealed a strong negative influence accompanied by a large

increase in milk production. Among studies that reported an improvement (Armstrong et

al., 1990; Ferguson et al., 1990; Sklan et al., 1991), a reduced number of services per

conception by feeding a fat supplemented diet occurred as well.

Dietary fats could favor reproductive processes through actions related to energy

balance or through specific actions of individual fatty acids on tissue function. Mattos et

al (2000) has suggested that altered uterine and ovarian function can be mediated through

specific fatty acid precursors in the diet to allow increased steroid and/or eicosanoid

secretion. There are many examples of effects of feeding diets high in specific fatty

acids. Linoleic acid supplemented in the diet prepartum can stimulate arachidonic acid

synthesis and lead to higher concentrations of the series 2 prostaglandins (Thatcher et al.,

1994). It is speculated that linolenic acid may compete with arachidonic acid for binding

sites of a key enzyme, cyclooxygenase 2 (PGHS-2), which is necessary for the synthesis

of PGF2a (Mattos et al., 2000; 2004).

Supplementation of the diet with Hish meal has been reported to reduce uterine

PGF2a Secretion of lactating dairy cows (Thatcher et al., 1997). Fish meal contains

relatively high concentrations of two polyunsaturated fatty acids of the n-3 family, EPA

(eicosapentaenoic acid) and DHA (docosahexaenoic acid). Concentrations of EPA and

DHA in Hish oil have been reported to be 10.8 and 1 1.1% of total fatty acids (Donovan et

al., 2000). EPA and DHA can inhibit secretion of PGFza in different cell culture systems

(Levine and Worth, 1984; Achard et al., 1997) including bovine endometrial cells










(Mattos et al., 2001). Using fish meal to replace soybean meal as a source of protein,

Bruckental et al. (1989) and Armstrong et al. (1990) reported higher pregnancy and

conception rates. These results suggest that high concentrations of EPA and DHA in the

diet can reduce PGF2a endometrial secretion and aid in establishment of pregnancy rates.

Administration of antioxidants

Reactive oxygen species are a possible source of infertility because ovarian

steroidogenic tissue (Carlson et al., 1993; Margolin et al., 1992), spermatozoa (Rivlin et

al., 2004), and preimplantation embryos (Fujitani et al., 1997) become compromised as a

consequence of free radical damage. Vitamin E (i.e., a-tocopherol) and p-carotene are

maj or antioxidants present in plasma membranes of cells (Wang and Quinn, 1999; 2000).

Treatment of cows with vitamin E and selenium can increase the rate of uterine

involution in cows with metritis (Harrison et al., 1986) and improve fertilization rates in

ewes (Segerson and Ganapathy, 1980) and cows (Segerson et al., 1977). In general,

however, treatment of lactating cows with vitamin E alone, through feeding or inj section,

had little or no benefits on postpartum cows (Kappel et al., 1984; Stowe et al., 1988;

Arechiga et al., 1998a; Paula-Lopes et al., 2003).

p-carotene is another cellular antioxidant and is thought to be present at the interior

of membranes or lipoproteins (Niki et al., 1995). Cows fed diets deficient in p-carotene

had lower amounts of progesterone in the CL (Ahlswede and Lotthammer, 1978). In

spite of this, its effect on fertility is controversial. Some authors report benefits of

feeding supplemental p-carotene (Ahlswede and Lotthammer, 1978; Rakes et al., 1985;

Arechiga et al., 1998b) whereas others do not (Wang et al., 1982; Akordor et al., 1986).

There was no strong relationship between serum concentrations of p-carotene and fertility









in dairy cattle (Gossen et al., 2004; Gossen and Hoedemaker, 2005). Injection of vitamin

A, a metabolite of p-carotene, resulted in an increase in the number of recovered

blastocysts from superovulated cows (Shaw et al., 1995).

Crossbreeding

Two bulls (Chief and Elevation) make up about 30% of the gene pool of U. S.

Holsteins (Hansen et al., 2005). As mentioned previously, inbreeding coefficients are

rising in American dairy cattle (Short et al., 1992; Wiggans et al., 1995; Young et al.,

1996; Hansen, 2000; Wall et al., 2005) and there is some evidence that this has

contributed to the decline in fertility seen in dairy cattle (Thompson et al., 2000ab;

Alvarez et al., 2005; Wall et al., 2005). Crossbreeding represents a strategy for

preventing effects of inbreeding especially if the milk yield of crossbreds can approach

that of Holstein cattle.

A study in Canada revealed that some groups of crossbred cattle were equivalent to

Holstein controls in lifetime net profit (McAllister et al., 1994). Hansen et al. (2005)

conducted a study using seven large dairies in California to compare characteristics of

several crossbred animals (Normande-Holstein, Montebeliarde-Hol stein, and

Scandinavian Red-Holstein) versus Holsteins. Milk production as well as fat and protein

production during the first 150 DIM among first lactation cows was not significantly

different among breed types. Holsteins produced an average of 29.9 kg, followed by

Scandinavian Red-Holstein with 29.7 kg, Montebeliarde-Hol stein with 28.8 kg, and

Normande-Holstein with 26.5 kg. Calving difficulty and stillbirths were reduced in

crossbred animals. Survival rates indicate that purebred animals left these dairies sooner.

The first service conception rate was 22% for Holsteins compared to 30 35% for

crossbreds. There were also significantly fewer days open for crossbred cows. Thus,










crossbreeding offers some promise for enhancing fertility. One unanswered question is

the optimal type of mating scheme for the crossbred animals themselves and whether the

resultant loss of heterosis in the F2 animals will reduce any advantage over purebred

cows .

Embryo Transfer

The concept of using embryo transfer (ET) as a tool to increase pregnancy rates is

based on the observation that disruptive events such as anovulation, ovulation of oocytes

with low developmental competence, compromised oviductal transport or uterine

environment, and insemination errors or damaged spermatozoa all occur before the time

when embryos are ordinarily transferred (day 6 8 after estrus) (Hansen and Block,

2004). Selection of morula and blastocyst stage embryos for transfer offers the chance to

avoid pregnancy failure associated with the early stages of embryonic development (day

0 8 after estrus).

It has been proposed that during absence of heat stress, pregnancy rates following

embryo transfer as compared to AI in lactating cows are not optimal (Putney et al.,

1989b; Drost et al., 1994; Ambrose et al., 1997). However, ET may become a more

effective strategy to increase pregnancy rates as compared to AI in lactating cows during

periods of heat stress, and the magnitude of the increased temperature does not seem to

influence overall success following transfer (Hansen and Arechiga, 1999). As embryos

advance in their development, the effects of elevated temperatures become less

significant because embryos become more resistant to the deleterious effects of elevated

temperatures (Ealy et al., 1992; Ealy and Hansen, 1994; Ealy et al., 1995; Edwards and

Hansen, 1997; Rivera and Hansen, 2001). As a result, pregnancy rates following ET









during heat stress are higher than pregnancy rates to AI (Putney et al., 1989b; Ambrose et

al., 1999; Al-Katanani et al., 2002a) although not in the absence of heat stress.

One potential constraint for embryo transfer in lactating cows is the short duration

of estrus and lack of intense mounting activity seen in dairy cows (Dransfield et al.,

1998). This phenomenon is exacerbated by heat stress (Nebel et al., 1997) and will limit

the number of embryos transferred in lactating cows in a program that is dependent upon

estrus detection. The first report of a timed embryo transfer (TET) protocol, where

ovulation was synchronized using an Ovsynch protocol, was by Ambrose et al. (1999)

who evaluated the efficiency of TET using either fresh or frozen-thawed in vitro

produced (IVP) embryos and TAI under heat stress conditions. Pregnancy rates in cows

that received a fresh IVP embryo were higher compared to cows in the TAI group.

Limitations to Optimal Pregnancy Rates Using IVP TET

For ET to replace AI on a wide scale in commercial herds ET must become an

economical breeding alternative and embryos must be inexpensive to produce (Hansen

and Block et al., 2004). Superovulation provides the best source of embryos while the

most likely inexpensive source of embryos will be produced from slaughterhouse oocytes

by IVP since superovulation is costly and requires intensive management and careful

synchronization of the donor cows.

Although embryos produced using IVP systems are relatively inexpensive as

compared to embryos produced by superovulation, pregnancy rates achieved following

transfer of an IVP embryo are often less than what is obtained following transfer of an

embryo produced by superovulation. For example, Hasler (2003) reported a 36.7%

pregnancy rate for in vitro derived embryos vs. 54.8% for in vivo embryos. The reason

for the poor survival of IVP embryos is not known. However, IVP embryos are different









from in vivo embryo in terms of morphology (Massip et al., 1995; Crosier et al., 2001;

Rizos et al., 2002), gene expression (Bertolini et al., 2002a; Lazzari et al., 2002;

Lonergan et al., 2003), metabolism (Krisher et al., 1999; Khurana and Niemann, 2000b)

and chromosomal abnormalities (Iwasaki et al., 1992; Viuff et al., 2000). One or more of

these alterations likely contributes to the poor embryo survival after transfer. Calves born

as the result of in vitro production are also more likely to experience developmental

defects (Hasler et al., 2003; Farin et al., 2006).

One possible strategy for increasing pregnancy rates is to transfer two embryos into

the uterine horn ipsilateral to the CL. This approach is based on the idea that the

likelihood is increased that the cow receives at least one embryo competent for sustained

development. In addition, the transfer of two embryos into the ipsilateral uterine horn to

the CL is likely to increase the amounts of IFN-z and other embryo-derived signaling

molecules in the uterus needed to maintain pregnancy and prevent luteolysis. Co-transfer

of embryonic vesicles to increase trophoblastic signals has been reported to increase

pregnancy rates in ET recipients (Heyman et al., 1987).

In a recent study, there was a tendency for higher calving rates for recipients that

received two embryos in the uterine horn ipsilateral to the CL as compared to recipients

that received one embryo (Bertolini et al., 2002a). The requirement for the antiluteolytic

signal in cattle to be locally administered (del Campo et al., 1977, 1983) means that one

should expect pregnancy rates to be higher in cows that received two embryos in the

same uterine horn (unilateral transfer) than for cows that received two embryos

distributed in both uterine horns (bilateral transfer). The opposite was true for heifers

(Anderson et al., 1979). In other studies, transfer of embryos to create two pregnancies in









the uterine horn ipsilateral to the CL has produced a similar pregnancy rate as bilateral

twins and single pregnancies (Sreenan and Diskin, 1989; Reichenbach et al., 1992) or

reduced pregnancy rate as compared to bilateral transfer (Rowson et al., 1971).

Cryopreservation of IVP Embryos

An additional limitation to the widespread use of IVP embryos in cattle is their

poor survival following cryopreservation. Hasler et al. (1995), Ambrose et al., (1999) and

Al-Katanani et al. (2002a) indicated that IVP embryos do not survive freezing as well as

embryos produced in vivo based on pregnancy rates following transfer as compared to

non-frozen embryos. In vitro survival rates following thawing (Pollard and Leibo, 1993;

Enright et al., 2000; Khurana and Niemann, 2000a; Diez et al., 2001; Guyader-Joly et al.,

1999) and pregnancy rates following thawing and transfer (Hasler et al., 1995; Agca et

al., 1998; Ambrose et al., 1999; Al-Katanani et al., 2002a) are consistently lower for IVP

embryos as compared to embryos produced in vivo by superovulation.

Among the metabolic changes associated with IVP embryos linked to poor

freezability is an increase in lipid content (Abe et al., 1999; Rizos et al., 2002).

Mechanical delipidation (Tominaga et al., 2000; Diez et al., 2001) and addition of

inhibitors of fatty acid synthesis (De la Torre-Sanchez et al., 2005) can improve embryo

survival following cryopreservation. Hatching rates were higher for delipidated embryos

compared to controls when day 7 blastocysts were frozen (Murakami et al., 1998), but

pregnancy rates after the transfer of delipidated embryos was 10.5% compared to 22% for

control embryos (Diez et al., 2001). Although delipidated embryos can survive freezing

conditions when tested in vitro, special consideration must be taken since these embryos

do not reflect higher pregnancies and remain less viable than control embryos.









Manipulating the cryopreservation process to minimize damage to the embryo has

also been considered. Of most promise are procedures based on vitrification, which is

defined as "the solidification of a solution (glass formation) brought about not by

crystallization but by extreme elevation in viscosity during cooling" (Fahy et al., 1984).

Vitrification depends on rapid cooling and thawing of embryos while using high

concentrations of cryoprotectants associated with elevated cooling rates (~2500oC/min,

Palasz and Mapletoft, 1996). Although vitrification does not eliminate toxic effects of

cryoprotectants and osmotic damage, the rapid cooling has been reported to decrease

chilling injury and prevent damage associated with high lipid content (Dobrinsky, 1996;

Martino et al., 1996ab). In vitro survival rates following the thawing of vitrified IVP

embryos was either equal (Van-Wagtendonk et al., 1995) or superior to embryos frozen

conventionally (Dinnyes et al., 1995; Agca et al., 1998; O'Kearney-Flynn et al., 1998).

Sensitivity of in vivo derived embryos to cryopreservation is much less and the

complex environment where the embryo develops is key. It has been reported that

embryos cultured in the sheep oviduct (26%) compared to synthetic oviductal fluid in

culture systems (7%) were better able to tolerate freezing conditions. Embryos cultured

in Buffalo rat liver cells or oviductal cells were more resistant to freezing as well as

compared to embryos not subj ected to co-culture (Massip et al., 1993; Leibo and

Loskutoff, 1993; Tervit et al., 1994).

Summary and Objectives of the Thesis

There has been a precipitous decline in fertility of dairy cows over the last 10-40

years and heat stress is associated with infertility in lactating dairy cows. To characterize

events associated with infertility is important and the purpose of the present series of

experiments described in this thesis was to evaluate strategies that help overcome








reproductive failure. Improving reproductive function in dairy cattle is of maj or interest

and experiments were designed to 1) evaluate strategies for enhancing fertility after AI

using GnRH treatment and 2) further develop ET using IVP embryos as a tool for

increasing fertility by testing whether pregnancy rate could be improved by transfer of

twin embryos and whether the developmental competence of embryos after

cryopreservation could be improved.


4.0



o
3.0 -,



2.0 O


1.5 u


-15


-14.5 f


14 m
I




1.5 ~



2000


1980


1990


Year

Figure 1-1. Rolling herd average (RHA, kg milk per lactation), calving interval (CI), and
services per conception (SPC) for 143 dairy herds continuously enrolled in the
Raleigh DHIA record system from 1970 to 1999 (Lucy, 2001).


9000



8000 .



7000 -



6000



5000
1970













50 s 10500
Cool season
S451 10000

S40-
-9500
co Warm Season Milk Yield
c 35-T
"~ 9000 a,
S30 -1
e 8500 =
o 25- >

a, 20 -1 -8000

.5~~~ 15. 7500


Figure 1-2. Temporal changes in first service pregnancy rate and annual average milk
production from high-producing Holstein-Friesian dairy herds in north-eastern
Spain. Data for pregnancy rate were recorded in the cool (October April
months) and warm season (May-September months). Data were drawn by P.J.
Hansen (unpublished) based on data of Lopez Gatius (2003).















CHAPTER 2
EFFECTIVENESS OF ADMINISTRATION OF GONADOTROPIN RELEASING
HORMONE AT DAY 11, 14 OR 15 AFTER ANTICIPATED OVTULATION FOR
INCREASING FERTILITY OF LACTATINTG DAIRY COWS AND NON-
LACTATINTG HEIFERS

Introduction

One of the approaches proposed to improve fertility in cattle is administration of

GnRH or GnRH analogues at day 1 1-15 after estrus. Inj section of GnRH at this time can

lead to decreased estrogen secretion (Rettmer et al., 1992a; Mann and Lamming, 1995a)

in an action that likely involves luteinization of the dominant follicle (Thatcher et al.,

1989; Rettmer et al., 1992a; Ryan et al., 1994). In some cases, extended estrous cycle

length (Lynch et al., 1999) and increased progesterone secretion also results (Rettmer et

al., 1992a; Stevenson et al., 1993; Ryan et al., 1994; Willard et al., 2003). Improvement

of fertility has been seen by administration of GnRH or its analogues at day 1 1-14 in

nulliparous beef heifers (Rettmer et al., 1992b) and lactating dairy cows (Macmillan et

al., 1986; Lajili et al., 1991; Sheldon et al., 1993; Drew and Peters, 1994; Willard et al.,

2003; L6pez-Gatius et al., 2005a). In contrast to these positive results, there was no

favorable effect of similar treatments of GnRH or GnRH analogues on pregnancy rates in

other studies (Jubb et al., 1990; Stevenson et al., 1993; Ryan et al., 1994; Bartolome et

al., 2005). In a meta-analysis of published results, Peters et al. (2000) concluded that the

overall effect of GnRH administration betweendDay 11 and 14 after anticipated ovulation

was positive, but that results were not consistent between studies.









It is possible that GnRH treatment is more effective at increasing pregnancy rate

per insemination during periods of heat stress than in cool weather because circulating

concentrations of progesterone can be reduced in cows subj ected to heat stress

(Wolfenson et al., 2000). In addition, the anti-luteolytic process may be compromised

because heat stress can decrease growth of the filamentous stage concepts (Biggers et

al., 1987) and increase uterine prostaglandin-Fza Secretion from the uterus (Wolfenson et

al., 1993). Beneficial effects of GnRH treatment at day 1 1-12 after insemination on

fertility have been observed in lactating dairy cows during heat stress (Willard et al.,

2003; L6pez-Gatius et al., 2005a). The purpose of the present series of experiments was

to evaluate the effectiveness of GnRH treatment at either day 11, 14 or 15 after

anticipated ovulation for improving fertility of lactating cows and heifers and determine

whether the beneficial effect of GnRH was greater during summer than winter.

Materials and Methods

Experiment 1 GnRH Administration at Day 11 after Anticipated Ovulation in
Heifers Subjected to Timed Artificial Insemination during Heat Stress

The experiment was conducted at a commercial dairy located in Trenton, Florida

(29037' N 82o49' W) from July to September, 2003 using 149 Holstein heifers. The

heifers ranged in age from 13-23 mo (mean=539 d, SD=76) and ranged in weight from

316 to 448 kg (mean=360 kg, SD=32). Heifers were maintained on grass pasture with

supplemental grass hay. Heifers were randomly allocated to one of four treatments in a 2

x 2 factorial design with main effects of timing of insemination (protocol A vs B) and

treatment (vehicle vs GnRH). The experiment was replicated twice with between 70 and

79 heifers per replicate. Heifers were subj ected to timed artificial insemination (TAI)

based on a protocol published previously (Martinez et al., 2002ab). On Day -10 of the









protocol (Day 0 equals the day of anticipated ovulation), heifers received 100 Cpg (i.m.) of

GnRH (Fertagyl, equivalent to 50 pug /ml gonadorelin diaecetate tetrahydrate; (Intervet

Inc. Millsboro, DE) and an unused intravaginal progesterone-releasing device insert

(EAZI-BREED CIDR" insert, 1.38 g of progesterone, Pfizer Animal Health, New York,

NY, USA). At Day -3, CIDR devices were removed and 25 mg (i.m.) of prostaglandin

Fz, (PGF2,; 5 ml Lutalyse", Pfizer Animal Health, New York, NY, USA) was

administered. A second 100 Cpg GnRH injection was given 48 h after CIDR withdrawal

(Day -1). Regardless of estrus behavior, heifers in protocol A were inseminated 24 h

after the second GnRH injection (d 0) and heifers in protocol B were inseminated at the

same time as the second GnRH injection (d -1). Two individuals conducted all

inseminations and semen from one sire was used for all heifers. Heifers from each

synchronization treatment protocol were randomly allocated to receive either 100 Cpg of

GnRH, (i.m.) or an equivalent volume (2 ml) of vehicle (9 mg/ml of benzyl alcohol and

7.47 mg/ml of sodium chloride in water) at Day 11 after anticipated ovulation.

On the day of insemination and on Day 11 after anticipated ovulation, a 10-ml

blood sample was collected via coccygeal or jugular venipuncture into heparinized tubes

(Becton Dickinson, Franklin Lakes, NJ) to measure the proportion of heifers successfully

synchronized. An animal was considered synchronized if progesterone concentrations

were lower than 1 ng/ml on the day of insemination and greater than 1 ng/ml on Day 11

after anticipated ovulation. A third blood sample was collected in a subset of 76 heifers

at Day 15 after anticipated ovulation (i.e., 4 d after the inj section of GnRH or vehicle) to

determine the effect of GnRH treatment on serum concentrations of progesterone.

Pregnancy was diagnosed by palpation per rectum at Day 44-51 after insemination.









Blood samples were stored on ice (~2-4 h) until centrifugation at 2,000 x g for 20

min at 4 oC to obtain plasma. Plasma was stored at -20 oC until assayed for progesterone

concentrations using a progesterone radioimmunoassay kit (Coat-a-Count@; Diagnostic

Products Corp., Los Angeles, CA). The sensitivity of the assay was 0.1 ng/ml and the

intrassay and interassay CV were each 6%.

Experiment 2 GnRH Administration at Day 11 after Anticipated Ovulation in
Lactating Cows Subjected to Timed Artificial Insemination

This study took place at the University of Florida Dairy Research Unit (Hague,

Florida; 29046' N 82o25' W). A total of 244 primiparous and multiparous lactating

Holstein cows housed in freestall barns equipped with a fan-and-sprinkler system were

used. Cows were fed a total mixed ration (TMR) to meet or exceed requirements

recommended for lactating dairy cows, were milked three times a day, and received

bovine somatotropin (Posilac, Monsanto Corp., St. Louis, MO) according to

manufacturer' s recommendation. Cows were subj ected to the OvSynch TAI program

(Schmitt et al., 1996a; Pursley et al., 1998); 100 Cpg (i.m.) GnRH (Fertagyl equivalent to

50 Cpg /ml gonadorelin diaecetate tetrahydrate, Intervet, Millsboro, DE) was inj ected at

Day 0 of the protocol, 25 mg (i.m.) PGF2, (5 ml of Lutalyse", Pfizer Animal Health, New

York, NY, USA) was given at Day 7, 100 Cpg (i.m.), GnRH was again injected, i.m., at

Day 9, and cows were inseminated 16 h later (the day of anticipated ovulation). At the

time of insemination (from January September, 2004), 244 cows were between 76 and

594 days in milk (DIM; mean= 176, SD= 114). Multiple individuals conducted

inseminations (n=7) and multiple AI sires were used (n=45).

Cows were randomly assigned within pair to receive 100 Cpg (i.m.) GnRH or an

equivalent volume (2 ml) of vehicle (9 mg/ml benzyl alcohol and 7.47 mg/ml sodium









chloride in water) at Day 11 after anticipated ovulation (i.e., 11 d after insemination).

Rectal temperature was recorded in a subset of cows (n=134) on the afternoon of Day 1 1

after TAI at 1500 1600 h. Pregnancy was diagnosed by rectal palpation at ~Day 46

after insemination.

Experiment 3 GnRH Administration at Day 14 after Anticipated Ovulation in
Lactating Cows Subjected to Timed Artificial Insemination

This study was conducted at two different locations using lactating Holsteins.

Farm 1 was the University of Florida Dairy Research Unit at Hague, Florida while farm 2

was a commercial dairy in Chiefland, Florida (29030' N 82o52' W). Cows from farm 1

(n=307) were inseminated from February November 2004 and cows in farm 2 (n=170)

were inseminated from June October 2004. At both farms, primiparous and multiparous

cows were used. At farm 1, 307 cows were TAI between 76 590 DIM (mean= 187,

SD= 102). Multiple individuals conducted inseminations (n=7) and multiple AI sires

were used (n=42). At farm 2, 170 cows were used for first service after calving using

seven different sires and one inseminator. The TAI protocol was designed to achieve

insemination at 60 + 3 d in milk. Cows in both farms were housed in freestall barns

equipped with fans and sprinklers, were fed a TMR, were milked three times a day, and

received Posilac@ (Monstanto, St. Louis, MO) according to manufacturer' s directions.

Cows in farm 1 were subjected to an OvSynch protocol as described for

Experiment 2. Cows for farm 2 were subj ected to a TAI protocol that incorporated a pre-

synchronization with PGF2, (Moreira et al., 2001) and the CIDR-Synch ovulation

synchronization protocol (Portaluppi and Stevenson, 2005). Cows received two

inj sections of 25 mg PGF2, (i.m.) (Lutalyse) 14 d apart starting on Day 21-27 DIM.

Twelve days after the second PGF2, inj section, a timed ovulation synchronization protocol









was initiated. Cows received 100 Cpg (i.m.) GnRH (2 ml of Cystorelin ; Merial Limited,

Iselin, NJ, USA) and an unused EAZI-BREED CIDR" intravaginal progesterone-

releasing device insert. Seven days later, CIDR devices were removed and 25 mg (i.m.)

PGF2, waS given. Cows received a second 100 Cpg (i.m.) injection of GnRH at 72 h after

CIDR withdrawal. Estrus was detected using tail chalk or KaMar estrus detection

patches (KAMAR Inc., Steamboat Springs, CO, USA). Cows observed in estrus at 24 or

48 h after CIDR removal were inseminated at estrus. Cows not observed in estrus were

inseminated at 72 h after CIDR withdrawal. Ovulation was anticipated to occur 72 h

after CIDR withdrawal. All animals received the GnRH inj section at 72 h regardless of

estrus behavior. Cows were also randomly assigned within pair to receive either 100 Cpg

(i.m.) GnRH (2 ml of Cystorelin ; Merial Limited, Iselin, NJ, USA), or vehicle (as for

experiment 2) at 14 d after anticipated ovulation. Pregnancy was diagnosed by rectal

palpation at ~Day 45 after insemination.

Rectal temperature was recorded in a subset of 100 cows in Farm 1 and 39 cows in

Farm 2 at 1500 h of Day 14 after anticipated ovulation.

Experiment 4 GnRH Administration at Day 14 after Anticipated Ovulation in
Lactating Cows Subjected to Timed Artificial Insemination During Heat Stress

This study took place at the University of Florida Dairy Research Unit with

inseminations in April to June, 2005. A total of 137 primiparous and multiparous

lactating Holstein cows ranging in DIM from 78 to 566 d (mean= 185, SD= 110) were

subj ected to an OvSynch protocol as described for Experiment 2. Multiple individuals

conducted inseminations (n=4) and multiple AI sires were used (n=22).

Cows were randomly assigned within pair to receive 100 Cpg (i.m.) GnRH or an

equivalent volume (2 ml) of vehicle (9 mg/ml benzyl alcohol and 7.47 mg/ml sodium









chloride in water) at Day 14 after anticipated ovulation (i.e., 14 d after insemination).

Pregnancy was diagnosed by rectal palpation at ~Day 46 after insemination.

Experiment 5 GnRH Administration at Day 14 or Day 15 after Detected Estrus

This study took place at a commercial dairy in Chiefland, Florida. A total of 296

primiparous and multiparous lactating Holstein cows inseminated at detected estrus were

used. Cows were inseminated from April August, 2005. At the time of insemination,

cows were between 51 and 235 DIM (mean= 122, SD= 40).

Estrus was detected using tail chalk or KaMar estrus detection patches (KAMAR

Inc., Steamboat Springs, CO, USA). Estrus detection patches were visually monitored

twice (morning and afternoon) daily by the inseminator. When cows were first diagnosed

in estrus in the afternoon, insemination was performed the next morning. When estrus

was first detected in the morning, cows were inseminated at that time. Cows were bred

by one inseminator and 3 1 different sires used. Every other day of the experiment, cows

were selected to receive injections at Day 14 or 15 after insemination. Within each day,

cows were randomly assigned within a pair to receive 100 Cpg (i.m.) GnRH or an

equivalent volume (2 ml) of vehicle (9 mg/ml benzyl alcohol and 7.47 mg/ml sodium

chloride in water). Pregnancy was diagnosed by rectal palpation at ~Day 45 after

insemination.

Statistical Analysis

Data on pregnancy rate were analyzed by logistic regression with the LOGISTIC

and GENMOD procedures of SAS (SAS for Windows, Release 8.02; SAS Inst., Inc.,

Cary, NC). For the LOGISTIC procedure, a backward stepwise logistic model was used.

Variables were continuously removed from the model by the Wald statistic criterion if

the significance was greater than 0.20. The Wald X2 statistic was used to determine the










significance of each main effect that remained in the reduced model. The adjusted odds

ratio (AOR) estimates and the 95% Wald confidence intervals from logistic regression

were obtained for each variable that remained in the final statistical model following the

backward elimination. Data were also analyzed by PROC GENMOD and P values for

significant treatment effects are reported from this analysis. The full mathematical model

for experiment 1 included main effects of inseminator, treatment, protocol, replicate,

replicate x protocol, replicate x treatment, replicate x inseminator, protocol x treatment,

protocol x inseminator, treatment x inseminator. The full mathematical model for

experiment 2 included the effects of season of insemination (January to March vs April to

September), treatment, and season x treatment. For experiment 3, the full mathematical

model included the effects of farm, treatment, season of insemination (warm vs cool

season; farm 1 = October to March vs April to September; farm 2 = June to September vs

October to November), and season x treatment, season x farm, and treatment x farm. In

addition, a subset of data composed of cows from farm 2 only was analyzed where the

additional factor of estrus detection (yes or no) was included in the model. For

experiment 4, the full mathematical model included the effects of treatment, month of

insemination, parity (1 vs others), sire, DIM at insemination class (<150 d vs > 150 d),

parity x treatment, DIM class x treatment and month x treatment. For experiment 5, the

full mathematical model included the effects of treatment, season of insemination (April

and May vs June to August), parity (1 vs > 1), number of services (1, 2 and >2), DIM at

insemination class (<150 d vs > 150 d) and interactions of main effects with treatment.

Since interactions were not significant, data were reanalyzed with main effects only.









Data on rectal temperatures were analyzed by least-squares analysis of variance

using the GLM procedure of SAS. The model included effects of season (Exp.2) or

season, farm and farm x season (Exp. 3).

A meta-analysis was performed using Mantel-Haenszel procedures available using

software downloaded from http://www.pitt.edu/~superl/lecture/lecl 171/index.htm.

Three analyses were performed using all experiments, experiments with GnRH

treatment at Day 11, and experiments with GnRH treatment at Day 14 or 15.

Results

Experiment 1 GnRH Administration at Day 11 after Anticipated Ovulation in
Heifers Subjected to Timed Artificial Insemination During Heat Stress

Based on progesterone concentrations measured at insemination and at Day 11 after

anticipated ovulation, estrous cycles of 137/149 (92%) of the heifers were successfully

synchronized. Pregnancy rate was not significantly affected by GnRH treatment or

insemination protocol. This is true whether all heifers were considered (Table 1) or only

those successfully synchronized (results not shown). There was also no effect (P > 0.10)

of GnRH treatment at Day 11 on concentrations of plasma progesterone on Day 15.

Values were 3.5 & 0.19 ng/ml for heifers receiving vehicle and 3.6 & 0.19 ng/ml for

heifers receiving GnRH.

Experiment 2 GnRH Administration at Day 11 after Anticipated Ovulation in
Lactating Cows Subjected to Timed Artificial Insemination

Treatment with GnRH did not significantly (P > 0.10) affect pregnancy rate per

insemination (Table 2). This was true for inseminations in both cool seasons (January to

March) and warm season (April to September) (results not shown). There was also no

significant difference in pregnancy rate between seasons.









Rectal temperatures were higher (P < 0.001) for cows in the warm season (least-

squares means + SEM; 39.3 + 0.07 oC) than for cows in the cool season (38.9 + 0.07 oC).

Experiment 3 GnRH Administration at Day 14 after Anticipated Ovulation in
Lactating Cows Subjected to Timed Artificial Insemination

Inj section of GnRH increased pregnancy rates at both farms (treatment, P < 0.02;

treatment x farm, non-significant) (Table 3). While pregnancy rates were lower in

summer than winter (P < 0.05), the effect of GnRH was apparent in both seasons and the

season x treatment interaction was not significant.

Cows in farm 2 were monitored for estrus. No cows were seen in estrus at 24 h

after PGF2a, 4.7% (8/171) were detected in estrus at 48 h, 32.2% (55/171) at 72 h, and

63.1% (108/171) were not detected in estrus. Cows in estrus at 48 h were inseminated at

that time while other cows (those seen in estrus at 72 h and those not seen in estrus) were

inseminated at 72 h. There was an estrus detection class (detected in estrus vs not

detected) x treatment interaction (P < 0.03) on pregnancy rate per insemination that

reflected the fact that GnRH was effective at increasing pregnancy rate for those cows

displaying estrus [3/29 (10%) for control and 12/34 (3 5%) for GnRH[ but had no effect

for those cows not displaying estrus [7/54 (13%) for control and 4/54 (8%) for GnRH].

Rectal temperatures were higher (P < 0.01) for cows in the warm season (least-

s uares means + SEM: 39.4 + 0.06 oC) than for cows in the cool season (39. 1 + 0. 11 oC)

and hi her (P < 0.001) for farm 2 (39.5 + 0.10 oC) than for farm 1 (39.1 + 0.07 oC but

there was no farm x season interaction.

Experiment 4 GnRH Administration at Day 14 after Anticipated Ovulation in
Lactating Cows Subjected to Timed Artificial Insemination During Heat Stress

Treatment with GnRH did not significantly affect pregnancy rate (Table 4).

Pregnancy rate was higher (P<0.02) for cows inseminated at or before 150 DIM (30.3%,









20/66) than for cows inseminated after 150 DIM (12.7%, 9/71). There were no other

significant main effects or interactions of GnRH treatment with other effects.

Experiment 5 GnRH Administration at Day 14 or Day 15 after Detected Estrus

Overall, pregnancy rate was higher (P<0.0001) for cows inseminated in April and

May (55/171, 32.2%) than for animals inseminated in June, July or August (12/125,

9.6%). There were, however, no other significant main effects or interactions of GnRH

treatment with other effects. Pregnancy rates were 25.6% (32/125) for cows receiving

vehicle at day 14 or 15, 20.7% (19/92) for cows receiving GnRH at Day 14, and 20.3%

(16/79) for cows receiving GnRH at Day 15.

Overall Effectiveness of GnRH Treatment as Determined by Meta-Analysis

When data from multiple experiments were considered together by meta-analysis,

there was no significant effect of GnRH on pregnancy rate. This was the case when all

experiments were considered (odds ratio=0.97; 95% CI=0.63, 1.50), or whether

experiments with GnRH treatment on Day 11 (odds ratio=0.87; 95% CI=0.50, 1.50) or

Day 14 or 15 (odds ratio=1.06; 95% CI=0.68, 1.65) were considered separately.

Discussion

Overall, there was no significant effect of GnRH treatment on pregnancy rate. In

particular, GnRH treatment at Day 11 after anticipated ovulation did not improve

pregnancy rate of heifers or lactating cows in any experiment, whether animals were

exposed to heat stress or not. Moreover, GnRH did not consistently improve fertility

when given at Day 14 after anticipated ovulation or at Days 14 or 15 after insemination.

In one experiment (experiment 3), administration of GnRH at Day 14 after anticipated

ovulation in cows subjected to TAI increased pregnancy rate of lactating cows in









summer and winter at two locations. However, this positive effect could not be replicated

either in lactating cows subj ected to TAI or for cows inseminated at standing estrus.

The variability in response to GnRH is reminiscent of the results of the meta-

analysis of published studies performed by Peters et al. (2000) in which inconsistency

between studies was noted. Variability in results could reflect either error in estimates of

treatment effects because of small numbers of experimental units or variability in

biological responses to GnRH. The number of animals used for the present studies varied

and could have been too small in some studies to detect significant differences or have

lead to sampling errors that obscured the magnitude or direction of the treatment

differences. However, meta-analysis of the entire data set, involving 1303 cows,

indicated that there was no overall effect of GnRH.

It is also possible that herds differ between each other or over time in the

predominant biological response to GnRH treatment. Presumably, beneficial effects of

GnRH post-insemination on fertility are related to its actions to cause LH release.

Treatment with GnRH at Day 1 1-15 of the estrous cycle can decrease function of the

dominant follicle (Thatcher et al., 1989; Rettmer et al., 1992a; Ryan et al., 1994; Mann

and Lamming, 1995a) and increase progesterone secretion (Rettmer et al., 1992a;

Stevenson et al., 1993; Ryan et al., 1994; Willard et al., 2003). The reduction in

estradiol-17P secretion caused by GnRH should delay luteolysis and conceivably allow a

slowly-developing concepts additional time to initiate secretion of interferon-z. Low

progesterone secretion may also compromise fertility in dairy cattle (Mann and

Lamming, 1999; Lucy, 2001) and an increase in progesterone secretion caused by GnRH

may facilitate embryonic development. Whether a herd responds to GnRH by undergoing









follicular changes may depend upon the characteristics of follicular growth because a

follicle must reach 10 mm in diameter to ovulate in response to LH (Sartori et al., 2001).

Perhaps, herds that do not respond to GnRH with an increase in fertility are herds where

many cows have lower follicular growth or follicular wave characteristics that do not

result in sufficient follicular development at the time of inj section.

One example of the potential importance of follicular dynamics in determining

responses to GnRH is the expected response to GnRH treatment at Day 11 after

anticipated ovulation. In the current studies, injection of GnRH at Day 11 after

anticipated ovulation did not increase pregnancy rates in either lactating Holstein cows or

nulliparous heifers. For lactating cows, the absence of an effect of GnRH at Day 11 was

seen in both summer and winter. This result, which agrees with other studies in which

inj section of GnRH at Day 11 does not affect fertility (Stevenson et al., 1993; Jubb et al.,

1990), is in contrast to other studies indicating that GnRH treatment at Day 11 can

increase fertility of heifers (Rettmer et al., 1992b) and lactating cows (Sheldon and

Dobson, 1993; Willard et al., 2003). One factor that could influence the effectiveness of

GnRH treatment at Day 11 is the number of follicular waves that an individual animal

expresses. Animals with estrous cycles characterized by three follicular waves have

larger second-wave dominant follicles at Day 11 of the estrous cycle than animals with

two-wave cycles (Ginther et al., 1989; Savio et al., 1990; Ko et al., 1991) and thus the

preponderance of cycle type (two-wave vs three-wave) within a herd may determine

effectiveness of GnRH treatment at Day 11. There is variation from study to study in the

relative frequency of three-wave vs two-wave cycles, at least among Holstein heifers

(Ginther et al., 1989; Knopf et al., 1989; Rajamahendran et al., 1991; Gong et al., 1993),










and this variation is evidence for herd-to-herd variation in frequency of follicular wave

patterns.

Even in animals with three-wave follicular cycles, Day 11 would appear to not be

an optimal time of the estrous cycle for using GnRH to cause luteinization because the

second-wave dominant follicle is smaller at Day 11 than at 14-15 in heifers (Ginther et

al., 1989; Ko et al., 1991) and lactating cows (Ko et al., 1991). Results from a limited

number of cows in Experiment 3 suggested that the effectiveness of GnRH at Day 14

after anticipated ovulation depends upon whether cows are detected in estrus.

Presumably, ovulation occurred on average sooner for cows in estrus at 48 and 72 h after

prostaglandin than for cows not detected in estrus (which contains cows that had not

initiated estrus by 72 h as well as some cows in which estrus occurred by 72 h but was

not detected). Among those detected in estrus, GnRH injection improved fertility from

10.3% to 35.3%. Among animals not detected in estrus, however, there was no

difference in pregnancy rate between animals treated with vehicle (13.0%) or GnRH

(7.6%). It is likely that GnRH did not affect pregnancy rate in the cows not detected in

estrus because this group included cows that were anovulatory at insemination or that

were not successfully synchronized; GnRH would be unlikely to increase pregnancy rate

in these animals.

It was hypothesized that beneficial effects of GnRH would be greater during heat

stress because this condition can decrease growth of the filamentous stage concepts

(Biggers et al., 1987), increase uterine prostaglandin Fza Secretion from the uterus

(Wolfenson et al., 1993) and reduce circulating concentrations of progesterone

(Wolfenson et al., 2000). Beneficial effects of GnRH treatment at Day 11-12 after









insemination on fertility have been observed in lactating dairy cows during heat stress

(Willard et al., 2003; L6pez-Gatius et al., 2005a). There was no evidence, however, that

GnRH was more effective during the summer. In particular, the increase in pregnancy

rate caused by inj section of GnRH at Day 14 during experiment 3 was similar for cows

inseminated in summer and winter. In other experiments conducted during the summer,

GnRH was without beneficial effect.

In experiment 1, there were no differences in pregnancy rates for Holstein heifers

inseminated either at second GnRH inj section (24.4%) or 24 after GnRH (19.8%). This

result is similar to results of Pursley et al. (1998) who reported little difference in

pregnancy rates and no differences in calving rates between lactating cows inseminated at

0, 8, 16, or 24 h after the second GnRH inj section of the OvSynch regimen. The

pregnancy rates achieved with heifers in experiment 1 were low compared to other

studies in which heifers received a similar ovulation synchronization program (Martinez

et al., 2002ab). The low fertility was not a result of delayed puberty or unresponsiveness

to the synchronization protocol because 92% of the heifers had both low progesterone

concentrations during the expected periovulatory period and high progesterone

concentrations at the predicted luteal phase of the cycle. It is possible that some of these

heifers classified as synchronized experienced short estrous cycles (Schmitt et al., 1996b;

Moreira et al., 2000a). The experiment was conducted during the summer and it is also

possible that heat stress reduced fertility. Although fertility in Holstein heifers does not

always decline during the summer (Ron et al., 1984; Badinga et al., 1985), there is one

report (Donovan et al., 2003) that heifers from a dairy farm in north central Florida

inseminated in summer were more than four times less likely to become pregnant to first





































GnRH Treatment
GnRH 20/78 25.6 1.29 0.59 -2.83 0.41
Vehicle 14/71 19.7


Protocol 4
B 20/79 25.3 1.34 0.61 -2.95 0.41
A 14/70 20.0


insemination than heifers inseminated during the rest of the year. It is also possible that

the one sire used to inseminate all heifers was not a fertile bull.

In conclusion, inj section of GnRH at Day 11-15 after anticipated ovulation or

insemination did not consistently increase pregnancy rates in heifers or lactating cows.

The fact that GnRH administration was effective in one study indicates that such a

treatment may be useful for increasing pregnancy rate in some herds or situations. More

work will be required to describe factors that could identify which groups of cows would

be most likely to benefit from GnRH treatment.

Table 2-1. Descriptive statistics, adjusted odds ratio (AOR) estimates, and 95% Wald
confidence intervals (CI) for effect of GnRH administration at Day 11 after
anticipated ovulation and ovulation synchronization protocol on pregnancy
rates of heifers during heat stress.

Pregnancy rate
Proportion % AOR 95% Wald CI P-value 2


Data represent the number of females pregnant at Day 44-5 1 after insemination / total number
of females inseminated.
2 Derived from PROC GENMOD.
3 Wald chi-square statistic =0.54 (N.S).
4 Wald chi-square statistic = 0.40 (N.S.)










Table 2-2. Descriptive statistics, adjusted odds ratio (AOR) estimates, and 95% Wald
confidence intervals (CI) for effect of GnRH administration at Day 11 after
anticipated ovulation and season of insemination on pregnancy rates of
lactating cows subj ected to timed artificial insemination.

Pregnancy rate
Proportion % AOR 95% Wald CI P-value 2
GnRH Treatment
GnRH 26/121 21.5 0.66 0.37 -1.18 0.16
Vehicle 36/123 29.3

Season 4
January March 30/103 29.1 1.38 0.77 -2.48 0.27
April September 32/141 22.7
'Data represent the number of females pregnant at ~d 45 after insemination / total number of
females inseminated.
SDerived from PROC GENMOD.
2Wald chi-square statistic =1.50 (N.S).
4 Wald chi-square statistic = 1.38 (N.S.)

Table 2-3. Descriptive statistics, adjusted odds ratio (AOR) estimates, and 95% Wald
confidence intervals (CI) for effect of GnRH administration at Day 14 after
anticipated ovulation and season of insemination on pregnancy rates of
lactating cows subj ected to timed artificial insemination.

Pregnancy rate
Proportion % AOR 95% Wald CI P-value 2
GnRH Treatment
GnRH 49/241 20.3 1.76 1.07 -2.89 0.02
Vehicle 3 0/23 6 12.7

Season 4
Oct, Nov, Feb,
40/187 21.4 1.76 1.08 -2.87 0.02
March
May September 39/290 13.5
Data represent the number of females pregnant at ~Day 45 after insemination / total number of
females inseminated.
SDerived from PROC GENMOD.
SWald chi-square statistic =4.94 (P=0.026).
4 Wald chi-square statistic = 5.12 (P=0.024)









Table 2-4. Descriptive statistics, adjusted odds ratio (AOR) estimates, and 95% Wald
confidence intervals (CI) for effect of GnRH administration at Day 14 after
anticipated ovulation and Days in milk (<150 d vs > 150) at insemination on
pregnancy rates of lactating cows subj ected to timed artificial insemination
during heat stress.

Pregnancy rate
Proportion % AOR 95% Wald CI P-value 2
GnRH Treatment
GnRH 11/73 15.1 0.43 0.18 -1.04 0.05
Vehicle 18/64 28.1


Days in milk at
insemination
< 150 d 20/66 30.3 3.11 1.27 7.62 0.02
> 150 d 9/71 12.7


SData represent the number of females pregnant at
number of females inseminated.
2 Derived from PROC GENMOD.
3 Wald chi-square statistic =3.55 (P=0.060).
4 Wald chi-square statistic = 6.12 (P=0.013)


-Day 45 after insemination / total















CHAPTER 3
EFFECT OF TRANSFER OF ONE OR TWO INT VITRO-PRODUCED EMBRYOS
AND POST-TRANSFER ADMINISTRATION OF GONADOTROPIN RELEASING
HORMONE ON PREGNANCY RATES OF HEAT-STRESSED DAIRY CATTLE

Introduction

The in vitro produced (IVP) embryo is different from the embryo produced in vivo

in terms of morphology (Iwasaki et al., 1992; Massip et al., 1995; Crosier et al., 2001),

gene expression (Bertolini et al., 2002a; Lazzari et al., 2002; Lonergan et al., 2003),

metabolism (Khurana et al., 2000b), and incidence of chromosomal abnormalities

(Iwasaki et al., 1992; Viuff et al., 2000). Not surprisingly, pregnancy rates achieved

following transfer of an IVP embryo are often less than what is obtained following

transfer of an embryo produced by superovulation and calves born as the result of in vitro

production are more likely to experience developmental defects (Hasler et al., 2003).

Problems associated with the transfer of IVP embryos have limited the realization of the

potential of these embryos for enhancing genetic improvement and reproductive

performance of lactating dairy cattle (Rutledge, 2001; Hansen and Block et al., 2004).

One method that might be useful for increasing pregnancy rates in dairy cattle

recipients that receive an IVP embryo is to transfer two embryos into the uterine horn

ipsilateral to the CL. Such a treatment might increase pregnancy rate because the

likelihood is increased that the cow receives at least one embryo competent for sustained

development. In addition, the transfer of two embryos into the ipsilateral uterine horn is

likely to increase the amounts of interferon-z and other embryonic signaling molecules in

the uterus needed to maintain pregnancy and prevent luteolysis. Co-transfer of










embryonic vesicles to increase trophoblastic signals has been reported to increase

pregnancy rates in embryo transfer recipients (Heyman et al., 1987). For the current

experiment, both embryos were transferred into the uterine horn ipsilateral to the CL

because of the requirement for the antiluteolytic signal in cattle to be locally administered

(Del Campo et al., 1977; 1983). In a recent study with a small number of transfers (n=10

to 28 recipients), there was a tendency for higher calving rate for recipients that received

two embryos in the uterine horn ipsilateral to the CL as compared to recipients that

received one embryo (Bertolini et al., 2002b). Anderson et al. (1979) found a tendency

for pregnancy rates to be higher in cows that received two embryos in the same uterine

horn (unilateral transfer) than for cows that received two embryos distributed in both

uterine horns (bilateral transfer); the opposite was true for heifers. In other studies,

transfer of embryos to create two pregnancies in the uterine horn ipsilateral to the CL has

produced a similar pregnancy rate as bilateral twins and single pregnancies (Sreenan and

Diskin, 1989; Reichenbach et al., 1992) or reduced pregnancy rate as compared to

bilateral transfer (Rowson et al., 1971).

Another treatment that has potential for increasing pregnancy rates in embryo

transfer recipients is inj section of GnRH at Day 11 after the anticipated day of ovulation.

Such a treatment was shown to increase pregnancy rates in heat-stressed, lactating cows

following insemination (Sheldon and Dobson, 1993; Willard et al., 2003) and embryo

transfer (Block et al., 2003). Treatment with GnRH or its analogues at Day 11 tol2 of

the estrous cycle has been reported to increase progesterone secretion (Ryan et al., 1994;

Willard et al., 2003) and inhibit function of the dominant follicle (Savio et al., 1990;

Ryan et al., 1994) to possibly delay luteolysis.










The purpose of the current pair of experiments was to examine the effectiveness of

unilateral transfer of twin embryos and treatment with GnRH at Day 11 after the

anticipated day of ovulation for increasing pregnancy rates in dairy cattle recipients that

received IVP embryos. Experiments were performed during periods of heat stress

because embryo transfer offers benefits as a method for increasing pregnancy rate as

compared to AI in females subj ected to heat stress (Rutledge, 2001).

Materials and Methods

Experiment 1 Single or Twin Transfer of IVP Embryos into Crossbred Dairy
Recipients

The experiment was conducted at a commercial dairy located in Santa Cruz,

Bolivia (17048' S, 63"10' W) from November December, 2004. Data on minimum and

maximum air temperatures during the experiment collected by Servicio Nacional de

Meteorologia e Hidrologia (http://www.senamhi. gov.bo/meteorologia/) for Santa Cruz

are presented in Figure 1. Females receiving embryos included 32 virgin crossbred

heifers sired by Simmental, Gyr, or Brown Swiss bulls and Holstein or Holstein

crossbred dams and 26 lactating, crossbred cows with the proportion of Holstein varying

from 1/2 to 15/16. The heifers ranged in age from 363 to 2070 d (mean = 850 d and

median = 664 d; SD = 421 d) and ranged in weight from 247 to 430 kg (mean = 310 kg

and median = 288 kg; SD = 52.3 kg). Animals were maintained on grass pasture until

two weeks prior to the start of the synchronization program when they also received a

supplement of 6 kg/head/d of spent brewers' grain. The cows ranged in age from 820 to

4075 d (mean = 2083 d and median = 1670 d; SD = 986 d), were maintained on grass

pasture, and received 11 kg of brewers' grains and 2 kg of a soybean-based concentrate

mixture before each milking. Cows were milked two times per day and ranged from 110









to 417 d in milk (mean =190 d and median = 170 d; SD = 75 d). Milk yield per day

across all days of lactation ranged from 5.9 to 21.1 kg/d (mean = 12.5 kg/d and median =

12.6 kg/d; SD = 3.8 kg/d).

Recipients were synchronized for timed embryo transfer using a modified OvSynch

protocol (Portaluppi and Stevenson, 2005) with the inclusion of a controlled intravaginal

drug releasing device (EAZI-BREED CIDR" insert, 1.38 g of progesterone, Pfizer

Animal Health, New York, NY, USA). On Day -10 (Day 0 equals the day of anticipated

ovulation), females received 100 Cpg (i.m.) of GnRH (1 ml of Profertil@; Tortuga Cia.

Zootecnica Agraria, Sho Paulo, Brazil) and an intravaginal progesterone-releasing device

insert that had been used one time previously. On Day -3, CIDR devices were removed

and females received 150 Cpg (i.m.) of PGFz, (2 ml of Prostaglandina Tortuga, Tortuga

Cia. Zootecnica Agraria). On Day 0, 100 Cpg (i.m.) of GnRH was administered.

Behavioral symptoms of estrus were monitored about 5 times each day for 3 d following

CIDR removal and PGF2, inj section. On Day 6 after anticipated ovulation, all females,

including those not seen in estrus, were examined per rectum for the presence of a CL

using an Aloka 210 ultrasound unit equipped with a 5 MHz linear array probe (Aloka,

Wallingford, CT, USA). A group of females having a CL (n=32 heifers and n=26 cows)

were randomly selected within recipient type (heifers or cows) to receive one (n=31

females) or two (n=27 females) embryos on Day 7 after anticipated ovulation. For

embryo transfer, an epidural block of 5 ml of lidocaine hydrochloride (2% w/v; Sparhawk

Laboratories Inc., Lenexa, KS, USA) was administered to each recipient, and one or two

IVP embryos were deposited into the uterine horn ipsilateral to the ovary containing the

CL. One technician conducted all transfers.









A total of 85 blastocysts (72 at Day 7 after insemination and 13 and Day 8 after

insemination) were transferred in this experiment. Of these, six were produced by

Transova (Sioux City, IA, USA) using Holstein oocytes and a Holstein sire and were

cultured in Synthetic Oviductal Fluid (SOF) medium. Embryos were shipped overnight

in a portable incubator to Gainesville, FL, USA on Day 4 after insemination. Embryos

were transferred to fresh microdrops of a modified SOF (Fischer-Brown et al., 2002)

prepared by Specialty Media (Phillipsburg, NJ, USA) and cultured at 38.5oC in a

humidified atmosphere of 5% 02 and 5% (v/v) CO2 (balance N2). The remainder were

produced using oocytes obtained from ovaries of a variety of breeds collected at a local

abattoir located at a travel distance of approximately 1.5 h from the Gainesville

laboratory. Procedures, reagents, and media formulation for oocyte maturation,

fertilization, and embryo culture were as previously described (Roth and Hansen, 2005)

with some modifications. Cumulus-oocyte complexes were matured for approximately

22 h at 38.50C in an atmosphere of 5% (v/v) CO2 in humidified air and then inseminated

with a cocktail of Percoll-purified spermatozoa from three different bulls of various

breeds. At 8 12 h post-insemination (hpi), putative zygotes were denuded of cumulus

cells by suspension in Hepes-TALP medium (Caisson, Rexburg, ID, USA) containing

1000 units/ml hyaluronidase type IV (Sigma, St Louis, MO, USA) and vortexed in a

microcentrifuge tube for 5 min. Presumptive zygotes were then placed in groups of ~30 in

50 Cll microdrops of KSOM-BE2 (Soto et al., 2003) (Caisson, Rexburgh, ID, USA) at

38.50C in an atmosphere 5% (v/v) CO2 in air.

Regardless of method of production, embryos greater than 16 cells in appearance

were collected at 1300 h on Day 6 or 7. Embryos were placed in groups of 21 to 65 into









2 ml cryogenic vials (Nalge Company, Rochester, NY, USA) filled to the top with

KSOM-BE2 that was pre-warmed and equilibrated in 5% (v/v) CO2 in air. Embryos

produced by Transova were kept separately from those produced using ovaries from the

local abattoir. Vials containing embryos were placed in a portable incubator (Minitube of

America, Verona, WI, USA) that had been pre-warmed to 390C for 24 h prior to use.

Embryos were shipped by air and arrived at Santa Cruz de la Sierra, Bolivia, at 1100 h

the next day (Day 7 or 8 after in vitro insemination) and transported by ground to the

farm.

Embryos were transferred over a time span from 1300 h and 2000 h. One or two

embryos were loaded into 0.25 cc straws in Hepes-TALP (Caisson) containing 10% (v/v)

bovine steer serum (Pel-Freez, Rogers, AR, USA) and 100 CLM 2-mercaptoethanol

(Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA). Embryos were transferred to recipients that were

palpated the day before and had a detectable CL. Recipients were randomly assigned to

receive one or two embryos, and all embryos were transferred into the ipsilateral horn to

the CL. Pregnancy diagnosis was performed by rectal palpation at Day 64 and 127 post-

transfer, and the number of fetuses was recorded on Day 127. Data collected at calving

included length of gestation (with the day of transfer being considered Day 7 of

gestation), occurrence of dystocia (defined as needing assistance), sex, weight and

viability of each calf, and occurrence of retained placenta (failure of the placenta to be

expelled within 12 h after calving). Calf survival until Day 7 of age was also recorded.

Experiment 2 Administration of GnRH on Day 11 after Anticipated Ovulation in
Lactating Recipients that Received an IVP Embryo

This study took place at a commercial dairy located in Bell, FL, USA (290 45' N

82o 51' W) from June to October, 2004. Data on minimum and maximum air









temperatures and average relative humidity collected by the Florida Automated Weather

Service (http:.//fawn.ifas.ufl_ edu) for Alachua, FL, USA are presented in Figure 1. A total

of 87 multiparous, lactating Holstein cows in late lactation were used as recipients. Cows

were fed a total mixed ration to meet or exceed requirements recommended for lactating

dairy cows, milked three times a day, and received bovine somatotropin (Posilac",

500 mg sometribove zinc, Monsanto, St. Louis, MO, USA) according to manufacturer' s

directions. Cows were housed in a dry lot with access to a permanent shade structure

without fans or sprinklers and with access to a cooling pond.

Cows were prepared for embryo transfer in groups of 6 to 18; a total of 10

replicates were completed. To synchronize recipients for timed embryo transfer, cows

received 100 Cpg (i.m.) of GnRH (2 ml of Cystorelin ; Merial Limited, Iselin, NJ, USA),

on Day -10; 25 mg (i.m.) of PGF2,, On Day -3; and 100 Cpg (i.m.) of GnRH, on Day 0

(i.e., the day of anticipated ovulation). On Day 7 after anticipated ovulation, all cows

were palpated per rectum for the presence of a CL. Cows that had a palpable CL received

an epidural block of 5 ml of lidocaine (2%, w/v), and a single embryo was transferred to

the uterine horn ipsilateral to the ovary containing the CL. Recipients were randomly

assigned to receive 100 Cpg (i.m) of GnRH or vehicle (9 mg/ml of benzyl alcohol and 7.47

mg/ml of sodium chloride in water) on Day 11 after anticipated ovulation.

The embryos used for transfer were produced in the Gainesville laboratory using

oocytes of various breeds and a pool of semen from three bulls of various breeds as

described for Experiment 1. A different pool of semen was used for each replicate.

Presumptive zygotes were cultured in groups of ~30 in 50 Cll microdrops of modified

SOF (Fischer-Brown et al., 2002) containing 100 ng/ml of insulin-like growth factor-1









(Upstate Biotechnology, Lake Placid, NY, USA). Embryos were cultured at 38.50C in a

humidified atmosphere of 5% (v/v) 02 and 5% (v/v) CO2 with the balance N2. On Day 7

after insemination, blastocysts were harvested and transported to the farm in 2 ml

cryogenic vials (20 to 25 embryos/tube) filled to the top with pre-warmed Hepes-TALP.

Tubes containing embryos were placed in a portable incubator (Minitube of America,

Verona, WI, USA) that had been pre-warmed to 390C for 24 h prior to use. Embryos

were transported to the farm and loaded in 0.25 cc straws prior to transfer into recipients.

Pregnancy was diagnosed by rectal palpation at Day 45 to 53 after anticipated ovulation.

Statistical Analysis

Categorical data were analyzed by logistic regression using the LOGISTIC

procedure of SAS for Windows (Version 9, SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, USA) with a

backward stepwise logistic model. Variables were continuously removed from the model

by the Wald statistic criterion if the significance was greater than 0.2. The full statistical

model for Experiment 1 included treatment (one embryo or two embryos), parity (cows

vs heifers), estrus (observed in estrus vs not observed) and treatment x parity on

pregnancy rate, pregnancy loss, calving rate, calf mortality and twinning rate. The only

variable in the final mathematical model for Experiment 2 was GnRH treatment as other

effects (replicate and replicate x treatment) were not significant. The adjusted odds ratio

estimates and the 95% Wald confidence intervals (CI) from logistic regression were

obtained for each variable that remained in the final statistical model following the

backward elimination. Data were also analyzed with the GENMOD procedure of SAS to

determine the significance of each effect that remained in the reduced model; P values for

logistic regression analyses reported in the tables are derived from these analyses. Data

for gestation length and calf birth weight were analyzed by analysis of variance using









Proc GLM. The full statistical model included the effects of treatment, parity and

treatment x parity. The X2 test was used to determine whether the sex ratio of calves

differed from the expected 1:1 ratio.

Results

Experiment 1 Single or twin transfer of IVP embryos

Pregnancy and calving rates

Data are summarized in Table 1. At Day 64 of gestation, the pregnancy rate tended

to be higher (P=0.07) for cows than for heifers. While there were no significant effects

of number of embryos transferred or parity x number transferred, heifers that received

two embryos tended to have lower pregnancy rates than those that received a single

embryo (20% for two embryos vs 41% for one embryo) while there was no difference in

pregnancy rate due to number of embryos transferred to cows (50% for two embryos vs

57% for one embryo).

Pregnancy losses between Day 64 and 127 occurred in one group only cows

receiving two embryos. In that group, pregnancy rate was 50% at Day 64 but decreased

to 17% at Day 127. There was no difference in pregnancy rates at Day 127 between

cows and heifers, but recipients that received two embryos had lower pregnancy rates

(17% for cows and 20% for heifers) than recipients that received one embryo (57% for

cows and 41% for heifers, P < 0.03).

Pregnancy loss after Day 127 occurred in one female only. In particular, a cow

receiving a single embryo gave birth to a stillborn calf at 251 d of gestation. Like for

pregnancy rate at Day 127, there was no difference in calving rate between cows and

heifers, but recipients that received two embryos had lower calving rates (17% for cows









and. 20% for heifers) than recipients that received one embryo (50% for cows and 41%

for heifers, P < 0.03).

Estrus was detected at 24, 48 or 72 h after prostaglandin inj section in 21/32 heifers

(8 at 24 h after injection and 13 at 48 h) and 19/26 cows (1 at 24 h after injection, 14 at

48 h and 4 at 72 h). While not statistically different (P=0. 11), there was a tendency for

pregnancy rates to be lower for animals not detected in estrus. For example, pregnancy

rates at Day 127 for animals receiving one embryo was 55% (11/20) for animals in estrus

vs 36% (4/11) for animals not observed in estrus. Pregnancy rates at Day 127 for animals

receiving two embryos were 25% (5/20) for animals in estrus vs 0% (0/7) for animals not

observed in estrus.

Characteristics of gestation, parturition, and calves

Gestation length was affected by recipient type x number of embryos transferred

(P<0.05; Table 2). For cows, gestation length was slightly longer for those receiving one

embryo as compared to those receiving two embryos while the opposite was true for

heifers. Two of 5 females calving that received two embryos produced twin calves. There

was no significant effect of recipient type or number of embryos transferred on dystocia

or incidence of retained placenta (Table 2). Sex ratio (including the one stillborn calf)

was in favor of males with 15 males compared to 7 female calves born (68% male; Table

3). This ratio tended to be different from the expected 1:1 ratio (P<0. 10).

While there were no significant differences, there was a tendency for calf mortality

at birth to be greater for heifers receiving two embryos than for other groups (Table 3).

None of the cows lost their calf at birth and only 1 of 7 heifers receiving a single embryo

experienced calf death at birth. In contrast, 2 of 3 heifers receiving two embryos

experienced calf loss. One heifer had twin fetuses and both were born dead as a result of










complications with calving. Another heifer gave birth to a single calf that was born dead

as a result of complications with calving. The calf from the third heifer was born alive.

All calves born alive were alive 7 d later.

Experiment 2 Administration of GnRH on Day 11 after Anticipated Ovulation

Administration of GnRH at Day 11 after anticipated ovulation had no effect

(P>0.10) on pregnancy rates. Recipients treated with GnRH had a pregnancy rate of

17.8% (8/45) while those recipients that received placebo had a pregnancy rate of 16.7%

(7/42). The odds ratio was 1.08 with 95% Wald confidence interval of 0.23 and 3.30.

Discussion

The purpose of the experiments described here was to examine two strategies for

increasing pregnancy rates in heat-stressed dairy recipients that receive an IVP embryo.

Neither approach, transferring two embryos into the uterine horn ipsilateral to the CL or

inj section of GnRH at Day 11 after anticipated ovulation, increased pregnancy rates.

Results of Experiment 1 indicated that the transfer of two embryos into recipients

led to pregnancy loss and that such loss occurred earlier for heifers than for cows. There

was a distinct difference in pregnancy rate between heifers that received one or two

embryos as early as Day 64 of gestation. Among cows, in contrast, there were no

differences in pregnancy rate at this stage of gestation between recipients that received

one or two embryos. By Day 127, however, cows that received two embryos experienced

substantial mid-to-late fetal loss and pregnancy rate and subsequent calving rate was

lower for this group than for cows that received a single embryo.

The most likely explanation for the increased frequency of pregnancy loss in

recipients receiving two embryos is uterine crowding, with the effects of crowding

occurring sooner in gestation for nulliparous animals than for multiparous animals.









Similar results were obtained in another study (Anderson et al., 1979). In that study,

calving rates and twinning rates were similar for cow recipients regardless of whether

twin transfers were performed via bilateral or unilateral placement. For heifers, in

contrast, calving rate and twinning rate was lower for unilateral twin transfers than for

bilateral transfers. Using heifers, Rowson et al. (1971) also found lower embryonic

survival rates and twinning rates for recipients of unilateral twin transfers than for

recipients of bilateral transfers.

It is evident, however, that uterine capacity can vary between herds of cattle. Thus,

there were no differences in pregnancy success between recipients of twin embryos

placed unilaterally or bilaterally for heifers (Sreenan and Diskin 1989; Reichenbach et al.,

1992) or cows (Sreenan and Diskin 1989). Similarly, embryonic survival rate for beef

cows selected for twinning was similar for those having unilateral or bilateral multiple

ovulations (Echternkamp et al., 1990). In lactating dairy cows, in contrast, the likelihood

of a twin pregnancy resulting from multiple ovulation going to term was higher if

ovulations occurred bilaterally than if unilateral ovulations occurred (L6pez-Gatius et al.,

2005b). Perhaps, identification of the biological processes controlling uterine capacity

will lead to new approaches for increasing the efficacy of producing twins in cattle.

In an earlier study, administration of GnRH at Day 11 after anticipated ovulation

tended to increase pregnancy and calving rates in lactating Holstein recipients (Block et

al., 2003). The management of these cows was similar to those in Experiment 2. In both

studies, recipients were exposed to heat stress and received an IVP embryo using a timed

embryo transfer protocol. Effectiveness of treatment with GnRH or its analogues at 1 1

tol2 d after estrus for inseminated cows has yielded variable results, as some reports









indicated a positive effect (Sheldon and Dobson, 1993; Willard et al., 2003) while others

indicated no effect (Ryan et al., 1994). One factor that could influence the effectiveness

of GnRH treatment at Day 11 is the number of follicular waves that a female experiences

during an estrous cycle. Females with estrous cycles characterized by three follicular

waves have larger second-wave dominant follicles at Day 11 than females with two-wave

cycles (Ginther et al., 1989; Savio et al., 1990; Ko et al., 1991). Given that a follicle must

reach 10 mm in diameter to ovulate in response to LH (Sartori et al., 2001), the

preponderance of cycle type (two-wave vs three-wave) within a herd may determine

effectiveness of GnRH treatment at Day 11. Finally, it remains possible that failure to

observe an effect of GnRH treatment was because the number of animals per group was

low. The pitfalls associated with interpretation of experiments with low numbers has

been discussed (Amann, 2005) and could be responsible for the variation in results for

trials to test effects of GnRH on pregnancy rates in embryo transfer recipients.

Estrus is difficult to detect in lactating dairy cows because of the short duration of

estrus and the large proportion of cows that do not display intense mounting activity

(Dransfield et al., 1998). This problem, which is exacerbated by heat stress (Thatcher et

al., 1986), makes embryo transfer in lactating cows inefficient if recipient selection is

based solely on estrus detection. The first report of a timed embryo transfer protocol,

where ovulation was synchronized using an OvSynch protocol, was by Ambrose et al.

(1999). The suitability of timed embryo transfer as a method for preparing recipients was

demonstrated in Experiment 1 because calving rates were 50 and 41% for cow and heifer

recipients that received a single embryo, respectively. Similarly, using beef recipients, a

pregnancy rate of 49% was achieved using timed embryo transfer (Bo et al., 2002). In










contrast, pregnancy rate at Day 45 of gestation in Experiment 2 was only 17%. Low

pregnancy rates have been reported in other studies with timed embryo transfer using

lactating, heat-stressed recipients with pregnancy rates at ~ 45 d of gestation following

timed embryo transfer ranging from 11 26% (Ambrose et al., 1999; Al-Katanani et al.,

2002a; Block et al., 2003). The reason for the differences in pregnancy rates between

Experiment 1 and 2 cannot be deduced because of the large number of variables between

studies including nutrition, housing, level of milk yield, stage of lactation, breed,

synchronization protocol, and embryo culture protocol.

Despite the effectiveness of timed embryo transfer, there was a tendency for

pregnancy rates in Experiment 1 to be higher for those recipients detected in estrus. Most

of the animals not detected in estrus likely ovulated after the last GnRH inj section because

embryos were only transferred to recipients with a detectable CL. Nonetheless, some

cows in this group probably were not synchronized with respect to predicted ovulation

time.

Transfer of IVP embryos has been associated with large calf syndrome, increased

rates of fetal loss, sex ratio skewed towards the male and increased rate of dystocia and

calf mortality (see Hasler et al., 2000; Hansen and Block, 2004; Farin et al., 2004 for

review). There are also reports of prolonged gestation length (Kruip and den Dass, 1997;

Rerat et al., 2005). In Experiment 1, most characteristics of the fetus and calf that were

measured in females receiving one embryo were within normal ranges including

gestation length, rates of fetal loss, calf birth weight, and calf survival at birth and within

the first 7 d of age. The incidence of dystocia among females receiving one calf was 21%

and it is difficult to determine whether this value is high because of the particular mating









combinations used (embryos of diverse genotypes transferred into females of several

different genotypes). In a study with Holsteins bred by artificial insemination, the

frequency of difficult births ranged from 6 to 18% (Dj emali et al., 1987).

The one abnormality identified was a skewed sex ratio with 68% of the calves

being male. While previous work suggests that the altered sex ratio among IVP embryos

is due to toxic effects of concentrations of glucose in excess of 1 mM on female embryos

(Kimura et al., 2005), the concentration of glucose in the medium used for culture here

(KSOM-BE2) contains only 0.2 mM glucose (Soto et al., 2003). Others have found a

tendency for male embryos to become blastocysts sooner in development when cultured

in KSOM than female embryos (Nedambale et al., 2004b). Differences in sex ratio have

been seen as early as between the eight-cell and morula stages of development (Block et

al., 2003). While it is possible that selection of most embryos for transport done on Day

6 after insemination exacerbated the skewed sex ratio, Block et al. (2003) reported that

64% of calves born as a result of transfer of IVP embryos cultured in modified KSOM

were male even though embryos were harvested for transfer on Day 8 after insemination.

In conclusion, results indicate that unilateral transfer of two embryos to increase

pregnancy rate is unwarranted. The fact that fetal loss occurred sooner for heifers than

cows points out the importance of uterine capacity as a limiting factor for maintenance of

fetal development of two conceptuses. There was also no evidence that GnRH treatment

at Day 11 after anticipated ovulation improves pregnancy rate. Finally, the suitability of

timed embryo transfer as a method for preparing recipients for transfer was evident by the

high pregnancy and calving rates achieved with crossbred females that received a single

embryo. Additional research is warranted to reduce incidence of skewed sex ratio.









While sexed semen could be used to control sex ratio (Wilson et al., 2005), it is likely

that the underlying biological causes of altered sex ratio affect other aspects of embryo

physiology also.












Table 3-1. Effect of recipient type and number of embryos transferred per recipient on pregnancy rates and losses.
Pregnancy loss Pregnancy loss
Pregnancy rate, d Pregnancy rate, d
Reipen tpe64ofesatinb between Day 64 and between Day 127
127fgetaton" 127 of gestation Calving rate" and calving
Latain cw8/14 (57%) 8/14 (57%) 0/8 (0%) 7/14 (50%)1/(3%
single embryo
Lactating cow -
6/12 (50%) 2/12 (17%) 4/6 (66%) 2/12 (17%) 0/2 (0%)
two embryos
Nulliparous heifer -
7/17 (41%) 7/17 (41%) 0/7 (0%) 7/17 (41%) 0/7 (0%)
single embryo
Nulipros eier 3/15 (20%) 3/15 (20%) 0/3 (0%) 3/15 (20%) 0/3 (0%)>
two embryos
a Data are the proportion of animals pregnant of those that received embryos and, in parentheses, the percent pregnant.
b Logistic regression indicated effect of recipient type (P=0.07). The odds ratio estimate was 0.38 (heifer/cow) (95% Wald CI = 0. 13,
1.14; Wald Chi-Square statistic = 2.96, P=0.08).
" Logistic regression indicated an effect of number of embryos transferred (P<0.03). The odds ratio estimate was 4. 13 (one
embryo/two embryos) with a 95% Wald CI of 1.243, 13.690. Wald Chi-Square statistic 5.36; P<0.03).
d Data are the proportion of pregnant recipients at Day 64 that lost their pregnancy by Day 127 of gestation and, in parentheses, the
percent pregnancy loss.
e Data are the proportion of animals that calved of those that received embryos and, in parentheses, the percent pregnant.
* Logistic regression indicated an effect of number of embryos transferred (P<0.03). The odds ratio estimate was 3.62 (one
embryo/two embryos) with a 95% Wald CI of 1.090, 12.047. Wald Chi-Square statistic 4.41; P<0.04).
g Data are the proportion of pregnant recipients at Day 127 that lost their pregnancy before calving and, in parentheses, the percent
pregnancy loss.
h One cow expelled a stillborn calf at 251 d of gestation.









Table 3-2. Effect of recipient type and number of embryos transferred per recipient on
characteristics of pregnancy and parturition.
Gestation Twin Retained
Recipient type length, da pregnancieSb Dystociac placentad


)

)

)

)


Lactating cow -
282 + 3 0/7 (0%) 2/7 (29%) 4/7 (57%
single embryo
Lactating cow -
274 + 5 1/2 (50%) 0/2 (0%) 1/2 (50%
two embryos
Nulliparous heifer -
276 + 3 0/7 (0%) 1/7 (14%) 5/7 (71%
single embryo
Nulipfos eier 284 + 4 1/3 (33%) 1/3 (33%) 2/3 (67%
two emb~ryos-
aData are least-squares means + SEM. Gestation length was affected by recipient type x
number of embryos transferred (P<0.05).
b Data are the proportion of pregnancies in which twin calves were born and, in
parentheses, the percent pregnant. Logistic regression indicated an effect of number of
embryos transferred (P<0.02).
" Data are the proportion of pregnancies in which dystocia was recorded at birth and, in
parentheses, the percent cows experiencing dystocia.
d Data are the proportion of cows calving that experienced retained placenta and, in
parentheses, the percent cows experiencing retained placenta.









Table 3-3. Effect of recipient type and number of embryos transferred per recipient on
characteristics of calves born.
Sex ratio Calf birth Calf mortality
aMF) -egt kb Calf mortality
Recipient type at birth" today7
aged
Lacatig cw -5:3e 34 + 3 0/7 (0%) 0/7 (0%)
single embryo
Lactating cow -
2:1 25 + 5 0/3 (0%) 0/3 (0%)
two embryos
Nulipaoushei4: 3 26 +3 1/7 (14%)' 0/6 (0%)
single embryo
Nullipru heifer -
~ ~p~~s~~4:0 25 + 3/4 (75%)' 0/1 (0%)
a The overall sex ratio of 15 male and 7 females tended to be different (P<0. 10) than the
expected 1:1 ratio.
b Data are least-s uares means + SEM.
" Data are the proportion of calves that were bomn dead and, in parentheses, the percent bomn
dead.
d Data are the proportion of calves born alive that died before d 7 of live and, in parentheses,
the percent death before Day 7.
e Data includes the stillborn calf at 251 d of gestation
'One calf was stillborn from a cow not experiencing dystocia.
g One heifer had twin fetuses and both were born dead as a result of complications with
calving. The other two heifers gave birth to a single calf. One calf was born alive and the
other was born dead as a result of complications with calving.








71





Experiment 1- Bolivia


30



E 20-

S15-

10
Nov 1 Nov 15 Dec1 Decl5 Dec 30


100
90
80
[Y 70
60
Experiment 2 Florida s
35-





iEi



Q 10-


June 1 July1 Aug 1 Sept1 Oct1 Nov1


Figure 3-1. Maximum (open circles) and minimum (closed circles) daily air temperatures
and relative humidities (RH) during the experiments.















CHAPTER 4
EFFECTS OF HYALURONIC ACID IN CULTURE AND CYTOCHALASIN B
TREATMENT BEFORE FREEZING ON SURVIVAL OF CRYOPRESERVED
BOVINE EMBRYOS PRODUCED IN VITRO

Introduction

In vitro production of embryos is an important tool for improving genetic merit and

fertility of cattle and is an indispensable component of other technologies such as somatic

cell cloning and transgenesis (Hansen and Block, 2004). One limitation to the

widespread use of in vitro produced embryos in the cattle industry is the poor

survivability of in vitro produced embryos to cryopreservation. In vitro survival rates

following thawing (Pollard and Leibo, 1993; Enright et al., 2000; Khurana and Niemann,

2000a; Diez et al., 2001; Guyader-Joly et al., 1999) and pregnancy rates following

thawing and transfer (Hasler et al., 1995; Agca et al., 1998; Ambrose et al., 1999; Al-

Katanani et al., 2002a) are consistently lower for embryos produced in vitro when

compared to embryos produced in vivo by superovulation.

The poor survival of the in vitro produced embryo is associated with culture-

induced changes in ultrastructure (Rizos et al., 2002), gene expression (Bertolini et al.,

2002a; Lazzari et al., 2002; Lonergan et al., 2003), and metabolism (Krisher et al., 1999;

Khurana and Niemann, 2000b) that make it distinct from the embryo produced in vivo.

Among the metabolic changes are an increase in lipid content (Abe et al., 1999; Rizos et

al., 2002) and this condition has been linked to poor freezability. Mechanical delipidation

(Tominaga et al., 2000; Diez et al., 2001) and addition of inhibitors of fatty acid synthesis

(De la Torre-Sanchez et al., 2005) can improve survival following cryopreservation.









In the current study, two approaches for enhancing survival of bovine embryos

following cryopreservation were evaluated. The first was to culture embryos in the

presence of hyaluronic acid. This unsulphated glycosaminoglycan is present in follicular,

oviductal and uterine fluids in several species including cattle (Lee and Ax, 1984).

Receptors for hyaluronic acid (CD44) have been reported on the bovine oocyte, cumulus

cell, and preimplantation stage embryo (Valcarcel et al., 1999). Addition of hyaluronic

acid to culture medium has been reported to increase blastocyst re-expansion and

hatching after freezing (Stojkovic et al., 2002; Lane et al., 2003). The second approach

was to determine whether altering the cytoskeleton before cryopreservation would

enhance embryo survival. The rationale for this treatment is that cryoinjuries such as

intracellular ice formation and osmotic shock induce irreversible disruption in

microtubules and microfilaments (Kuwayama et al., 1994; Fair et al., 2001) and that

temporary depolymerization of actin microfilaments before cryopreservation could

reduce cytoskeletal damage and plasma membrane fracture caused by alterations in

cytoskeletal architecture (Dobrinsky, 1996). Addition of cytochalasin B to cause actin

depolymerization had no effect on survival of eight-cell embryos in the mouse (Prather

and First, 1986) but enhanced survival of expanded and hatched blastocysts without

effecting survival of morula and early blastocysts in the pig (Dobrinsky et al., 2000).

Materials and Methods

Embryo Production

Procedures, reagents, and media formulation for oocyte maturation, fertilization,

and embryo culture were as previously described (Roth and Hansen, 2005) with some

modifications. Briefly, cumulus oocyte complexes (COCs) were harvested from ovaries

of a variety of breeds collected at a local abattoir located at a travel distance of









approximately 1.5 h from the laboratory. The COCs were matured in Tissue Culture

Medium-199 with Earle's salts supplemented with 10% (v/v) steer serum, 2 Cpg/mL

estradiol 17-P, 20 Cpg/ml follicle stimulating hormone, 22 Cpg/ml sodium pyruvate, 50

Cpg/ml gentamicin and an additional 1 mM glutamine for approximately 22 h at 38.50C in

an atmosphere of 5% (v/v) CO2 in humidified air. Insemination with a cocktail of

Percoll-purified spermatozoa from three different bulls was performed in In Vitro

Fertilization Tyrode's Albumin Lactate solution. At 8 12 h post-insemination (hpi),

putative zygotes were denuded of cumulus cells by suspension in Hepes-TALP medium

containing 1000 units/ml hyaluronidase type IV (Sigma, St Louis, MO, USA) and

vortexing in a microcentrifuge tube for 5 min. Presumptive zygotes were then placed in

groups of ~30 in 50 Cll microdrops of a modified Synthetic Oviductal Fluid (SOF)

prepared as described by Fisher-Brown et al. (2002). Embryos were cultured at 38.50C in

a humidified atmosphere of 5% (v/v) CO2, 5% 02, and with the balance N2. Blastocysts

were collected for cryopreservation on day 7 after insemination.

Experimental Design and Embryo Manipulation

The experiment was a 2 x 2 factorial design to test main effects of hyaluronic acid

during culture (+ or -) and cytochalasin B before cryopreservation (+ or -). Data on

development were obtained from 18 replicates using 5022 oocytes while data on

cryopreservation were obtained from 7 replicates using a total of 197 blastocysts.

Following insemination and transfer to fresh microdrops, embryos cultured without

hyaluronic acid were cultured in SOF for 7 days beginning after insemination. Embryos

treated with hyaluronic acid were cultured in SOF until day 5 when all embryos were

transferred to a fresh microdrop of SOF containing 6 mg/ml hyaluronic acid from

Streptococcus zooepidemicus (Sigma).









Blastocysts and expanded blastocysts were harvested on the morning of day 7 after

insemination and washed twice in holding medium consisting of Hepes-TALP (Parrish et

al., 1989) containing 10% (v/v) fetal calf serum (FCS). Embryos treated with

cytochalasin B were incubated for 10 min at 38.50C in air while in Hepes-TALP

containing 10% (v/v) FBS and 7.5 Cpg/ml cytochalasin B (Sigma) in a 1.5 ml

microcentrifuge tube (Tominaga et al., 2000). Cytochalasin B was initially dissolved in

DMSO at a concentration of 5 mg/ml and was then added to HEPES-TALP to achieve a

final concentration of 7.5 Cpg/ml. Control embryos were incubated similarly in HEPES-

TALP containing 10% (v/v) FBS.

Cryopreservation

Procedures for freezing were modified from those reported elsewhere (Hasler et al.,

1995; Enright et al., 2000). In brief, blastocysts were transferred in groups of 10 to a fresh

100 Cl~ microdrop of Hepes-TALP containing 10% FCS at 3 8.5oC for the time it took to

harvest all embryos (~ 10 min). Next, embryos in groups of 5 8 per treatment

hyaluronicc acid or control) were randomly selected to receive cytochalasin B treatment

before freezing or not as described above. Afterwards, each group of 5 8 embryos was

placed in a 50 Cl~ microdrop of 10% (v/v) glycerol in Dulbecco's phosphate-buffered

saline (DPBS) containing 0.4% (w/v) bovine serum albumin (freezing medium) in a grid

plate over a slide warmer at 30oC. Within 10 min, embryos were loaded in a 50 Cl1 volume

into 0.25 ml plastic straws (Agtech, Manhattan, KS). Up to 8 embryos were loaded in

each straw. Two columns of 50 Cl1 freezing medium separated by air bubbles were always

placed above and below the column of embryos. Straws were transferred to a freezing

chamber (Cryologic Model CL5500 (Mulgrave, Victoria, Australia) for 2 min at -5oC and

then ice crystals were induced by touching the straw where the top column of medium









resided with a cotton plug that had been immersed in liquid nitrogen. After an additional

3 min at -5oC, embryos were cooled to -32oC at a rate of -0.6oC/min. After 2 min at -

32oC, straws were directly immersed in liquid N2 and stored until thawing (4 days 1

week later).

Thawing and Determination of Survival

Straws containing embryos were thawed by warming for 10 sec in air at room

temperature and 20 sec in a 32oC water bath. All subsequent steps before culture were

performed with media prewarmed to ~30oC and with dishes placed on a slide warmer set

at 30oC. Embryos were then expelled into an empty petri dish and immediately

transferred to a fresh 60 Cl1 drop of DPB S containing 6.6% (v/v) glycerol and 0.3 M

sucrose in an grid dish. After 5 min, embryos were sequentially transferred to DPBS

containing 3.3% (v/v) glycerol and 0.3 M sucrose for 5 min and DPBS + 0.3 M sucrose

for 5 min. Embryos were then washed three times in HEPES-TALP + 10 % (v/v) FCS

and placed into culture in groups of 5- 8 in 25 Cl1 microdrops of SOF containing 10%

(v/v) FCS. Culture was at 38.50C in a humidified atmosphere of 5% (v/v) CO2, 5% 02,

and 90% N2. Re-expansion was determined at 48 h after thawing and hatching at 72 h.

Statistical Analysis

The proportion of oocytes that cleaved and the proportion of embryos that

developed to the blastocyst stage on day 7 and day 8 were determined for each replicate.

Treatment effects were determined by least-squares analysis of variance using the proc

GLM procedure of SAS (SAS for Windows 90, Cary, NC). The model included the main

effects of replicate and treatment. Data for the proportion of frozen/thawed embryos that

re-expanded and on the proportion that hatched by 72 h of culture were analyzed using

the CATMOD procedure of SAS. The initial model included all main effects and two-









way interactions. After removing nonsignificant effects, the final model included

replicate, hyaluronic acid, preparation prior to freezing (none, cytochalasin B), and the

interaction of hyaluronic acid and preparation before freezing.

Results

Effect of Hyaluronic Acid on Embryonic Development

As shown in Table 1, addition of hyaluronic acid at day 5 after insemination caused

a slight reduction in the yield of blastocysts on day 7 and day 8 after insemination

regardless of whether data were expressed as the proportion of oocytes developing to the

blastocyst stage (P < 0.05) or the proportion of cleaved embryos developing to the

blastocyst stage (P < 0.01). Of the blastocysts that were recovered, 62-68% were

recovered at day 7 and the balance at day 8. There was no effect of hyaluronic acid on

the proportion of blastocysts collected at day 7 (Table 4-1).

Survival after Cryopreservation

Overall, cytochalasin B increased the percent of embryos that re-expanded

following thawing (P < 0.0001) and that hatched following thawing (P < 0.05) (Table 4-

2). Re-expansion rates were 51.2% (22/43) for embryos treated with cytochalasin B and

18.2% (8/44) for embryos not subjected to cytochalasin B. Hatching rates were 39.5%

(17/43) for embryos treated with cytochalasin B and 4.5% (2/44) for embryos not

subj ected to cytochalasin B.

While there was no significant effect of hyaluronic acid on cryosurvival, there was

a tendency (P=0.09) for a hyaluronic acid x cytochalasin B interaction affecting percent

of blastocysts that hatched following thawing. This interaction reflects the fact that

hyaluronic acid increased the percent hatching for embryos not subj ected to cytochalasin

B treatment and decreased percent hatched for embryos subj ected to cytochalasin B.









Discussion

Of the two treatments evaluated for enhancing cryosurvival of in vitro produced

bovine embryos, cytochalasin B treatment was the most effective as determined by an

improvement in both embryo re-expansion and hatching. The rationale for this treatment

is to reduce cellular injury caused by disruption in microtubules and microfilaments

(Kuwayama et al., 1994; Fair et al., 2001) and to increase flexibility of the plasma

membrane to allow it to tolerate forces associated with freezing that lead to membrane

damage. In other studies, addition of cytochalasin B had no effect on survival of eight-

cell embryos in the mouse (Prather and First, 1986), enhanced survival of expanded and

hatched pig blastocysts without effecting survival of morula and early blastocysts

(Dobrinsky et al., 2000), and improved survival of in vivo derived bovine blastocysts

subj ected to vitrification (Dobrinsky et al., 1995).

For embryos not exposed to cytochalasin B, there was a tendency for those cultured

in hyaluronic acid to have a higher re-expansion rate and hatching rate than embryos

cultured without hyaluronic acid. Both Stojkovic et al. (2002) and Lane et al. (2003)

reported improved survival rates to freezing when embryos were cultured in hyaluronic

acid; such a beneficial effect has not always been observed (Furnus et al., 1998).

Surprisingly, embryos cultured in hyaluronic acid were less likely to survive freezing

than control embryos when the cytochalasin B treatment was applied. Perhaps

physiological changes induced by hyaluronic acid cause the embryo to be less able to

adjust to the cellular actions of cytochalasin B. Those changes are potentially numerous

because hyaluronic acid acts to affect cell function through several means including

signaling through cell surface receptors, modifying the biophysical properties of

extracellular and pericellular matrices by attracting water, and by interacting physically









with a variety of ions and other molecules (Laurent, 1987; Ruoslahti and Yamaguchi,

1991; Hardingham and Fosang, 1992; Yasuda et al., 2002; Toole et al., 2005). One

possible mechanism by which hyaluronic acid could increase embryo survival to freezing

is by increasing the total number of cells in the embryo (Stojkovic et al., 2002; Jang et al.,

2003; Kim et al., 2005)

One unexpected finding was the reduction in the percentage of embryos that

became blastocysts caused by hyaluronic acid. In other studies, hyaluronic acid either had

no effect (Stojkovic et al., 2002; Lane et al., 2003) or caused an increase in blastocyst

yield (Furnus et al., 1998; Jang et al., 2003). Differences in origin and concentration of

hyaluronic acid could explain some of this difference between studies. Hyaluronic acid

can be isolated from different sources (ex., bacteria, rooster comb, and umbilical cord)

and preparations can differ in protein, endotoxin, and nucleotide content (Shiedlin et al.,

2004). Stojkovic et al. (2002) reported that preliminary results indicated that embryo

development in vitro was dependent upon the origin of the commercially-avail able

hyaluronic acid. However, embryos cultured with hyaluronic acid experienced a change

in culture medium at day 5 whereas control embryos did not. Such a difference could

have obscured beneficial effects of hyaluronic acid although another paper indicates no

effect of changing culture medium at 72 hpi on blastocyst yield in cattle (Ikeda et al.,

2000).

The percent of embryos that underwent hatching after freezing in glycerol and

thawing has varied from 0% (Enright et al., 2000) 22% (Diez et al., 2001; Nedambale et

al., 2004a), 32% (Guyader-Joly et al., 1999) and 69% (Hasler et al., 1997). The best

survival achieved in this study was for embryos cultured without hyaluronic acid and









treated with cytochalasin B. In this group, 51.2% of cryopreserved embryos were

capable of re-expansion and 39.5% hatched. It is likely that the percent hatching can be

further improved by modifying post-thaw culture-conditions. Massip et al. (1993) found

hatching rates for frozen/thawed, in vitro produced embryos were 41% when culture was

performed in the presence of bovine oviductal epithelial cells while hatching rate using

other culture conditions not involving co-culture was 0-6%. Nonetheless, one would not

expect optimal pregnancy rates to be achieved following direct transfer of embryos

frozen in glycerol even with the inclusion of cytochalasin B treatment. Rather, it is

suggested that pregnancy rates following transfer of embryos cryopreserved using slow-

freezing procedures can be optimized by selecting embryos for transfer based on

development in culture shortly after thawing.

In contrast to the poor survival of in vitro-produced embryos frozen using

conventional slow-freezing techniques, several experiments indicate that cryosurvival can

be enhanced by using vitrifieation (Vajta, 2000). It remains to be tested whether survival

of embryos produced in vitro after vitrifieation can be improved by cytochalasin B

treatment. There was a beneficial effect of cytochalasin B treatment on cryosurvival of

embryos derived in vivo following vitrifieation (Dobrinsky et al., 1995).

In conclusion, cytochalasin B treatment before freezing improved cryosurvival of

bovine embryos produced in vitro and subj ected to slow-freezing in glycerol. Such a

treatment could be incorporated into methods for cryopreservation of bovine embryos

provided post-transfer survival is adequate. In contrast, culture with hyaluronic acid was

of minimal benefit the increased cryosurvival in the absence of cytochalasin B was not

sufficient to allow an adequate number of embryos to survive.









Table 4-1. Effect of hyaluronic acid added at day 5 after insemination on production of
blastocysts at day 7 and 8 after inseminationab.
Culture Number Percent Blastocysts/oocyte Blastocysts/cleaved Percent of
medium of cleaved (%) c embryo (%) c total
oocytes blastocysts
that were
collected at
day 7
Control 1935 76.0 + 36.0 + 1.2* 47.2 + 1.3** 68.8 + 2.4
0.9
Haluronic 3087 77.7 + 31.5 + 1.2 40.7 + 1.3 62.2 + 2.4
acid 0.9

a n=18 replicates
b Means within a column that differ significantly are indicated by (P < 0.05) and ** (P < 0.01)
Includes blastocvsts collected at day 7 and those collected at day 8.


Table 4-2. Effect of culture in hyaluronic acid and treatment with cytochalasin B on
survival after cryopreservation. a
Cytochalasin
Culture medium treatment Re-expansion by 72 hb Hatching by 72 he

Control Control 8/44 (18.2%) 2/44 (4.5%)
Control Cytochalasin B 22/43 (51.2%) 17/43 (39.5%)
Hyaluronic acid Control 16/55 (29.0%) 7/55 (12.7%)
Hyaluronic acid Cytochalasin B 26/55 (47.3%) 12/55 (21.8%)
a Data are the fraction of embryos, and in parentheses, percent. Number of replicates was 7.
b Effect of cvtochalasin B (P < .0001).
Effect of cvtochalasin B (P < 0.05), hyaluronic acid (P < 0.10), and the cytochalasin B x
hyaluronic acid interaction (P = 0.09).















CHAPTER 5
GENERAL DISCUSSION

As alluded to at the beginning of this thesis, there has been a precipitous decline in

fertility of dairy cows over the last 10-40 years in North America (Butler, 1998), Ireland

(Roche, 2000), Spain (L6pez-Gatius et al., 2003), and the United Kingdom (Royal et al.,

2000). In addition, heat stress can compromise fertility in lactating dairy cows (Putney et

al., 1989b; Al-Katanani et al., 1999). The purpose of the present series of experiments

described in the thesis was to 1) evaluate strategies for enhancing fertility after AI using

GnRH treatment (Chapter 2) and 2) further develop ET using in vitro produced embryos

as a tool for increasing fertility by testing whether pregnancy rate could be improved by

transfer of twin embryos (Chapter 3) and whether the developmental competence of

embryos after cryopreservation could be improved by hyaluronan or cytochalasin B

treatment (Chapter 4). Results indicated no consistent benefit of injection of GnRH at

Day 11-15 after anticipated ovulation or insemination on pregnancy rates in heifers or

lactating cows. While unilateral transfer of two embryos was not shown to be an effective

treatment for increasing pregnancy rate in recipients, the high pregnancy rates achieved

in this study point to the potential usefulness of ET as a tool for enhancing fertility.

Large-scale use of embryo transfer will require the ability to freeze embryos successfully.

Results suggest that treatment of embryos with cytochalasin B before freezing is a

promising tool for enhancing survival of embryos following cryopreservation. A large

number of studies have been performed to test the effect of GnRH administration after

expected ovulation on fertility of cattle. Previous results indicated that GnRH was









sometimes effective at increasing pregnancy rate, but this beneficial effect was often not

observed (Peters et al., 2000). Despite this knowledge, we chose to reevaluate the

effectiveness of GnRH treatment because of a report that GnRH treatment at Day 11 after

estrus increases pregnancy rates in lactating cows exposed to heat stress (Willard et al.,

2003). Accordingly, it was hypothesized in Chapter 2 that the beneficial effect of GnRH

treatment would be greater during the summer than winter. This may be so because the

antiluteolytic process may be compromised by heat stress because of decreased growth of

the filamentous stage concepts (Biggers et al., 1987) and increased uterine PGF2a

secretion from the uterus (Wolfenson et al., 1993).

Overall, the results of GnRH treatment were generally negative. For treatment at

Day 11i, a positive effect of GnRH on fertility was never seen. This was the case for

heifers and lactating cows subj ected to AI or whether animals were exposed to heat stress

or not (Chapter 2; experiment 1 and 2). Treatment of lactating recipients with GnRH at

Day 11 also failed to increase pregnancy rate during heat stress in ET recipients (Chapter

3, experiment 2). Effectiveness of treatment with GnRH or its analogues at 11 to 12 d

after estrus for inseminated, heat-stressed lactating cows has yielded variable results, as

some reports indicated a positive effect (Sheldon et al., 1993; Willard et al., 2003), while

others indicated no effect (Jubb et al., 1990). Also, administration of GnRH at Day 1 1

after anticipated ovulation tended to increase pregnancy and calving rates in lactating

Holstein embryo transfer recipients exposed to heat stress (Block et al., 2003).

One factor that could influence the effectiveness of GnRH treatment at Day 11 is

the number of follicular waves that a female experiences during an estrous cycle. Females

with estrous cycles characterized by three follicular waves have larger second-wave









dominant follicles at Day 11 than females with two-wave cycles (Ginther et al., 1989;

Savio et al., 1990; Ko et al., 1991). Given that a follicle must reach 10 mm in diameter to

ovulate in response to LH (Sartori et al., 2001), the preponderance of cycle type (two-

wave vs three-wave) within a herd may determine effectiveness of GnRH treatment at

Day 11.

In one experiment (Chapter 2; experiment 3), administration of GnRH at Day 14

after anticipated ovulation in cows subj ected to TAI increased pregnancy rates of

lactating cows in the summer and winter at two locations. In the following year, though,

GnRH failed to improve fertility when treatment was administered either at day 14 in

cows subj ected to TAI (experiment 4) or at day 14 or 15 in cows previously diagnosed

coming in estrus (experiment 5). It is important to recognize that GnRH treatment should

improve fertility only when triggering luteinization or ovulation of developing

estrogenicc) follicles. Thus, there are at least two possible reasons for a lack in response

upon GnRH treatment at day 14 or 15. One possibility relates to the timing of ovulation

relative to the GnRH treatment and whether these animals failed to ovulate after being

diagnosed as coming into estrus. Although after observing estrus one does not expect

ovulation to fail, this expression does not necessarily mean that subsequent ovulation

occurred (L6pez-Gatius et al., 2005b) and insemination after a false identified estrus

often occurs (Heersche and Nebel 1994). According to L6pez-Gatius et al. (2005b), the

risk of cows failing to ovulate (12%) during the summer was greater than in the cool

period (3%).

During experiment 3 all cows received a GnRH inj section at 72 h following

PGF2a to insure an ovulation of the synchronized dominant follicle. Perhaps, the positive









GnRH effect observed during experiment 3 was masked in the following experiment

because cows did not receive an additional GnRH dose at estrus to ensure subsequent

ovulation. According to Lopez-Gatius et al. (2005a), there is evidence demonstrating the

benefits upon GnRH treatment when given on the day of insemination compared to

controls (30.8% vs. 20.6%), but conception rates were greater if cows received an

additional dose at day 12 post-insemination (35.4%). On the other hand, when GnRH

treatment took place on day 15 to ensure a responsive estrogenicc) dominant follicle

would ovulate at the time of GnRH treatment, it failed to improve fertility as well.

Similarly, in a recent study (Bartolome et al., 2005) there was no effect of GnRH

treatment on pregnancy rates of lactating cows when administered either on day 15 or day

5 and 15 after TAI.

It remains possible that inconsistency in effects of GnRH treatment is caused in

part by the low number of animals per treatment group. The pitfalls associated with

interpretation of experiments with low numbers has been discussed (Dransfield et al.,

1998) and could be responsible for the variation in results for trials to test effects of

GnRH on pregnancy rates in embryo transfer recipients and for inseminated cows.

With an existent variation among trials regarding the use of GnRH at day 1 1-15

post-insemination, one could speculate that such inconsistency regarding treatment is due

to the fact that herds of cattle determine the result that an experiment achieves. However,

our results indicate that such a hypothesis is not likely because when an experiment was

replicated the next year using the same herd, GnRH treatment once again proved to be

inconsistent in improving pregnancy rates.









According to Thatcher et al. (2005), hCG results in a more prolonged rise in LH

activity than is achieved following GnRH treatment. Perhaps the likelihood of ovulating

or luteinizing the dominant follicles present at the time of treatment would be higher

using hCG. Although low numbers of inseminated animals were used (n=8; n=49) hCG

treatment on d 14 after estrus improved pregnancy rates (Raj amahendran and

Sianangama, 1992; Sianangama and Rajamahendran, 1992). Use of hCG warrants further

investigation for any additional effect or response during the summer to enhance

pregnancy rates of lactating cows.

Recent work has focused on use of ET to bypass early embryonic death (Putney et

al., 1989b; Ambrose et al., 1999; Al-Katanani et al., 2002a). Given that ET can be more

effective at increasing pregnancy rates than AI for lactating cows during periods of heat

stress (Putney et al., 1989b; Ambrose et al., 1999; Drost et al., 1999; Al-Katanani et al.,

2002a), the potential benefit of ET can be realized. For ET to become an economical

alternative to AI on a wide scale basis in commercial herds, embryos must be inexpensive

to produce (Hansen and Block et al., 2004). Although embryos produced using IVP

systems are relatively inexpensive as compared to embryos produced by superovulation,

pregnancy rates achieved following transfer of an IVP embryo are often less than what is

obtained following transfer of an embryo produced by superovulation (Hasler et al.,

1995; Agca et al., 1998; Ambrose et al., 1999; Al-Katanani et al., 2002a). In addition,

IVP embryos are less likely to survive freezing than superovulated embryos (Hasler et al.,

2003), likely due to their increased lipid content (Abe et al., 1999; Rizos et al., 2002).

Accordingly, the second approach for the thesis focused on improvements in ET by










comparing pregnancy rates following the transfer of two embryos compared to one and

by increasing the viability of embryos that were cryopreserved.

The first effort was to determine whether transfer of two IVP embryos into the

uterine horn ipsilateral to the CL could increase pregnancy rates during periods of heat

stress. It was hypothesized that such a treatment might increase pregnancy rates because

the likelihood is increased that the cow receives at least one embryo competent for

sustained development. In addition, the transfer of two embryos into the ipsilateral

uterine horn is likely to increase the amounts of interferon-z and other embryonic

signaling molecules in the uterus needed to maintain pregnancy and prevent luteolysis.

Transferring two embryos into the uterine horn ipsilateral to the CL failed to

increase pregnancy rates. Instead, the transfer of two embryos into recipients led to

pregnancy loss, which occurred earlier for heifers than for cows. The most likely

explanation for the increased frequency of pregnancy loss in recipients receiving two

embryos is uterine crowding, with the effects of crowding occurring sooner in gestation

for nulliparous animals than for multiparous animals. Regardless of whether twin

transfers were performed via bilateral or unilateral placement, similar results were

obtained in another study (Anderson et al., 1979). In contrast, calving rate and twinning

rate in heifers was lower for unilateral twin transfers than for bilateral transfers.

Similarly, Rowson et al. (1971) also found lower embryonic survival rates and twinning

rates for recipients of unilateral twin transfers than for recipients of bilateral transfers in

heifers.

It is evident that uterine capacity can vary between herds of cattle. Thus, there were

no differences in pregnancy success between recipients of twin embryos placed









unilaterally or bilaterally for heifers (Sreenan et al., 1989, Reichenbach et al., 1992) or

cows (Sreenan et al., 1989). Similarly, embryonic survival rate for beef cows selected for

twinning was similar for those having unilateral or bilateral multiple ovulations

(Echternkamp et al., 1990). In lactating dairy cows, in contrast, the likelihood of a twin

pregnancy resulting from multiple ovulations going to term was higher if ovulations

occurred bilaterally than if unilateral ovulations occurred (L6pez-Gatius and Hunter,

2005). Perhaps, identification of the biological processes controlling uterine capacity

will lead to new approaches for increasing the efficacy of producing twins in cattle.

An additional limitation to the widespread use of IVP embryos in cattle is their

poor survival following cryopreservation. In vitro survival rates following thawing

(Pollard and Leibo, 1993; Enright et al., 2000; Khurana and Niemann, 2000a; Diez et al.,

2001; Guyader-Joly et al., 1999) and pregnancy rates following thawing and transfer

(Hasler et al., 1995; Agca et al., 1998; Ambrose et al., 1999; Al-Katanani et al., 2002a)

are consistently lower for IVP embryos when compared to embryos produced in vivo by

superovulation.

The percent of embryos that underwent hatching after freezing in glycerol and

thawing has varied from 0% (Enright et al., 2000), 22% (Diez et al., 2001; Nedambale et

al., 2004a), 32% (Guyader-Joly et al., 1999), and 69% (Hasler et al., 1997). Of the two

treatments evaluated for enhancing cryosurvival of IVP bovine embryos, cytochalasin B

treatment was the most effective as determined by an improvement in embryo re-

expansion and hatching rates. In this treatment, 51.2% of cryopreserved embryos were

capable of re-expansion and 39.5% hatched. Nonetheless, one would not expect optimal