<%BANNER%>

Slavery, Coffee, and Family in a Frontier Society: Jeremie and Its Hinterland, 1780-1789

xml version 1.0 encoding UTF-8
REPORT xmlns http:www.fcla.edudlsmddaitss xmlns:xsi http:www.w3.org2001XMLSchema-instance xsi:schemaLocation http:www.fcla.edudlsmddaitssdaitssReport.xsd
INGEST IEID E20101123_AAAABZ INGEST_TIME 2010-11-23T10:55:48Z PACKAGE UFE0011650_00001
AGREEMENT_INFO ACCOUNT UF PROJECT UFDC
FILES
FILE SIZE 107026 DFID F20101123_AABAZZ ORIGIN DEPOSITOR PATH manuel_k_Page_67.jp2 GLOBAL false PRESERVATION BIT MESSAGE_DIGEST ALGORITHM MD5
a3ee860d62cb4552011f4af2989db839
SHA-1
f4813df185a445335ee7003a5733600203d16bf9
2195 F20101123_AABBGI manuel_k_Page_18.txt
9982ad80c01e77cc9f6cfa0deb2d703a
c942b5b0fe53644f901f977b8160c6d103187ea9
17539 F20101123_AABBFT manuel_k_Page_93.pro
a72808bfa0175526be8a9f28b3e335ea
60d08393a66cbb57dd4a2f5036a2b165d880a654
2626 F20101123_AABBGJ manuel_k_Page_19.txt
3757e21d1fae25c2e2721ae8cff5aa8a
53ab459f8394d5f47c1e789ec2a3fa7c4ea9c8fb
440 F20101123_AABBFU manuel_k_Page_01.txt
ecc26dc4f0f0499455afd2a4b0283b96
62013cb4a5c0a933157e02dd60d5e8a606aefb54
2374 F20101123_AABBGK manuel_k_Page_21.txt
4b153727ef369069806ad8697f43d02e
fadb3963b23b110983261ffef298bf86cff6ff22
112 F20101123_AABBFV manuel_k_Page_02.txt
759c67b08379d33d460820fad083f9d3
c019544e8ad28798d2266766489f60747f7f229d
1269 F20101123_AABBFW manuel_k_Page_03.txt
85e4e389edc7ebf4e4c091e856e4b3f8
646fd70a1e169c6619750fb6763a1079c39d47f3
2142 F20101123_AABBHA manuel_k_Page_44.txt
088bd606d9545a909f32ab156b666ac0
4ce560c6253f5340e5f990d9b14c031ad03832a0
2390 F20101123_AABBGL manuel_k_Page_22.txt
d51f73882edd17477e09718d0ad3ff81
7980143110f54c28e92a61f33a26a2d76ce177a3
2527 F20101123_AABBFX manuel_k_Page_04.txt
37bc95555a6e13f5ae430ea3f52b3ffc
1d6d18db5b10920f46e7d9a7b22ce92ea902933f
2184 F20101123_AABBHB manuel_k_Page_45.txt
081e174d79af3dbc834ac1b6228c4ef0
a7aeb5a9047918ab9d66538d4c2173e6a17934d9
2346 F20101123_AABBGM manuel_k_Page_23.txt
75c3388bdd195f892d22cf3cb7f43744
a1d18716d47d0bf91bee5e0db86d8bff0f665bbf
437 F20101123_AABBFY manuel_k_Page_05.txt
93f9f24704e0a4c5ad25a72d5b16d0a5
0b94a048ce8cdcd06242e84398c43bddbe6999de
2423 F20101123_AABBHC manuel_k_Page_46.txt
90ec5ac7cfb918a5496f48c5955d36a1
a934ea7157cdd9dd5c2516e0a6c3723745e91ff6
2312 F20101123_AABBGN manuel_k_Page_26.txt
edde0c39d29f4d1e7bbac0b5354a1332
ddd70641d5bb656615cbd42f2f0b4e0f3f1d4308
525 F20101123_AABBFZ manuel_k_Page_07.txt
9a06aab0b95e12acc7d0011b54bda0d2
6025ec71602d2bb79d3dd1f800c0c1cfeab1328a
2416 F20101123_AABBHD manuel_k_Page_50.txt
dc34c6ce744b0f89c2eab6012076737d
9a8b86898752b3aee1845c9a062cbf7ff9a9cdbd
2022 F20101123_AABBGO manuel_k_Page_28.txt
447536427dbc2440061d702d8d6941f2
e0abb545c18e4aa43a49aac0d809be4dd57e67e4
2227 F20101123_AABBHE manuel_k_Page_51.txt
5fc31a58cb7e48b25a39a9a88d7c7847
5abc140f6fba8f0cab59abff3b59f192eacd45f6
2569 F20101123_AABBGP manuel_k_Page_30.txt
3ace99cce4ef8171e7b4bf3e247510be
602c65025b3629a17c7871027157f2eba5e832db
1902 F20101123_AABBHF manuel_k_Page_52.txt
56ea721a4cba0d41ffc0cf64be418500
0562026aa24d87efe2c6aa1b8917db68b50dc794
2336 F20101123_AABBGQ manuel_k_Page_31.txt
09ad29b64af82b15b4cbdd05876ef790
8e8d70d7af063775a011fe6180727a0607fcfa7d
1801 F20101123_AABBHG manuel_k_Page_53.txt
7ab95605967cb52307890d2dbd65a1dd
10c77edff5810c41b6203515fde9be39815c9fd6
F20101123_AABBGR manuel_k_Page_32.txt
04a39aa3817073092b062120e0bf5903
ccaf802544c2b5893f488a85f5cc24ce2878c4bb
1841 F20101123_AABBHH manuel_k_Page_54.txt
9c13ffa521e9765ef9503b1ba9051978
65107cefb9da410a54232bda34a7640420ae820a
2457 F20101123_AABBGS manuel_k_Page_33.txt
7a4fb457a53d4e00b566c72364f5ff59
9439328664bbfd78fc341cd9c0033a4fcb6003a8
2965 F20101123_AABBHI manuel_k_Page_55.txt
fd4f6d03c44064f20a0ffd2c2b108901
30bfeca7252ffe8b25994f5cdb66b8468d7458b4
2117 F20101123_AABBGT manuel_k_Page_34.txt
c48f03f72ee4a7f5cda861ecd909fe71
591ffc7577e218d9256eec797394ee9336188031
2111 F20101123_AABBHJ manuel_k_Page_57.txt
fb16936866d2653854f09cfb63735328
3012b35f83629cea7fadc09b9a429df57a68b4e6
2097 F20101123_AABBGU manuel_k_Page_35.txt
5085488acdc6d5952c515165dee79c37
d426c2209516e8b91da214355f7c0f88d6dce2e6
1974 F20101123_AABBHK manuel_k_Page_58.txt
218a7b72939e260ae8ed459d3ce49705
7849e95499b3239d74a41293665bb78901e6f5e7
2258 F20101123_AABBGV manuel_k_Page_38.txt
84fd9c57031a07cf49842161f5d4353e
5f8235d15d34eb33999f3493f7b3008c34c7ce6f
2061 F20101123_AABBHL manuel_k_Page_59.txt
135e9d6ada5a571e234f96f1c101d11e
93f81f57641f52aea5ab14d99e35f1a9cb9e0cb0
1908 F20101123_AABBGW manuel_k_Page_39.txt
733cdf5ef9d2e01a234ff4cd83aa2b0c
67f653386c51d4e4f4796411017e46726fc983fd
2821 F20101123_AABBGX manuel_k_Page_40.txt
dde0218b73f69997672ec81f4eed10ee
9525e31e5a6a22a747f636045473a4e6bee61ca7
1894 F20101123_AABBIA manuel_k_Page_74.txt
910e5e7fcd97ecb37b5251b78333136c
fb05e6d079aa1a6c9c43651c99426190516deb38
2138 F20101123_AABBHM manuel_k_Page_60.txt
0777a1487b6c91da753869be0725f074
32528b57d3221accd4e3de0edb9702230072d2a2
2041 F20101123_AABBGY manuel_k_Page_41.txt
b174065ed6d1b8cb3064bbdd2ede964c
a5ce90f5309259a1fc7eab956909bd431b80de39
F20101123_AABBIB manuel_k_Page_76.txt
e409c7bb0b15d497aab0c05e199ecb45
a52044d0bc5f073897c9e53f55afef5db8e69db9
2587 F20101123_AABBHN manuel_k_Page_61.txt
5a00023cdbe409b1b73c6dd7b1a9f8fa
b771e5692e035d8e8eb2564edd5c17ee062b9d58
2270 F20101123_AABBGZ manuel_k_Page_43.txt
0fd8b3546ed23d2b60ec7b67530b3997
ecb853766bf16a89ca43184a0a2dced28906a2bf
2354 F20101123_AABBIC manuel_k_Page_77.txt
6b5e9cee96b93a0ebeef968a90fb23d7
ce91a9077da2ee6bb761c1a186e3e7706b47dd94
2083 F20101123_AABBHO manuel_k_Page_62.txt
0507fc2da7f52bfc70ee5989b24daa83
d4601b46c2bbbb83c4d1acdd5a3a1ee21606af69
2065 F20101123_AABBID manuel_k_Page_78.txt
f43e762fcdefce0f42a5192710450a44
a0d7808a97c7a440af204865e2d5db65f88e5333
1937 F20101123_AABBHP manuel_k_Page_63.txt
bd1d0315b4ce22f556cac947100823e9
73a22d7c194395b23988fd1d15a56be92f529bef
2193 F20101123_AABBIE manuel_k_Page_79.txt
20ea6283ceffb57bb1d2ce998dc11079
eba304641bc6cc2da14fe1ea7fc22636d565621c
1988 F20101123_AABBHQ manuel_k_Page_64.txt
9929b6d0b16d767d7690d21fdc8ae05b
30ca909e90dc5d4c92bae5cdfda94f474a33db8c
1803 F20101123_AABBIF manuel_k_Page_80.txt
93de4575e38ab86c9f5574f329ba9bb1
621e04d0d286ff1e54dc604623f193c0c04abad1
2731 F20101123_AABBHR manuel_k_Page_65.txt
39c3a1d25c204c09d51f5a8db783befe
21acc03b3af685f48ccdd2d628b50a6b78655ea8
2103 F20101123_AABBIG manuel_k_Page_81.txt
958a8c89666f23fb14ec3221291817d5
c312ddb97c5a24b2c39f752ca2dfcf1d7f9e33e0
1914 F20101123_AABBHS manuel_k_Page_66.txt
f884e9b4279e260aafade08b9469ab9a
8c8fc2a45f84f1995f50c093ef092e0d31aec98d
2039 F20101123_AABBIH manuel_k_Page_82.txt
0e52a4d1d46b20f10eb6e2a5c7ac7799
4c844e896f06ed201f97fcfb1b84d682d06a1d83
1999 F20101123_AABBHT manuel_k_Page_67.txt
83bd37874f7314ef91c0960bee2ffe1d
5d079579b60738f8824efc05babbd9efe5fed287
1906 F20101123_AABBII manuel_k_Page_83.txt
5ea079c89abdab4bb327258905abdf59
bd5d3df68866a154599c63eb95679190a82dc3c6
185 F20101123_AABBHU manuel_k_Page_68.txt
9363e1e4e60de9e6ee883fbe98d85d81
82289994a9265b8bb6eb7c92468fe09fb9540041
1968 F20101123_AABBIJ manuel_k_Page_84.txt
d08f093deb0b77a2c7103a0c31e9efc9
11d372d243affa07b98252f2b98c661041b8397c
1987 F20101123_AABBHV manuel_k_Page_69.txt
2abc65300dddb85eba2576043fff067d
7f4feda37f40f08d0cdb0a47dfff93e18d0cba47
1869 F20101123_AABBIK manuel_k_Page_85.txt
6463d307750ec28d5f79a49449741026
53e2406b0e4b47190737f220a040863f36fe8a9c
202 F20101123_AABBIL manuel_k_Page_86.txt
dd4fb70f80073143d7f0dca10fae8fa5
da40caf50481aa1743ceeb3fbf0feb3f105dbf19
2436 F20101123_AABBHW manuel_k_Page_70.txt
898d518e5ab12abb03417c4f9babd9fb
f95c4fa2edc7d7a6ab2883ba2f765e6fa034e0a3
7013 F20101123_AABBJA manuel_k_Page_07.QC.jpg
42700a023bb90667e95c50a0677752f3
fb4d529ffcb6ceecdf7a6f08238922b2d6766407
809 F20101123_AABBIM manuel_k_Page_89.txt
aea152bdf0ed20eb65359b87b7828ea9
7ea65fdcf6bd4862e97da4291b87291b72accafa
2615 F20101123_AABBHX manuel_k_Page_71.txt
3fa5770d9ff446d5c60c179c07386c1b
ced9f3dab02ccbef359fe4c4fc2a44784fa922c1
2331 F20101123_AABBJB manuel_k_Page_07thm.jpg
5083c25b82d8baf6ab0dbcc4423dc1b2
dab4fb7ad72f9a24b6bae60e5ba7b005cac9ca42
2172 F20101123_AABBHY manuel_k_Page_72.txt
01a95af454cc10e9e182ba542085409c
14f1423472ef4690fb55cd7bc62e6cb0dc7b3060
5759 F20101123_AABBJC manuel_k_Page_08.QC.jpg
3c6d48d9958846a7860139be97b5d36e
c50bdfda92c056df5fa9117167d38db9cd6e70e1
1743 F20101123_AABBIN manuel_k_Page_90.txt
580b755e1fe011c10af112d3fbf37dab
54184a759c03fafa1691ed2416874f6b5a9ffd51
2401 F20101123_AABBHZ manuel_k_Page_73.txt
f548decf43dfc108d13c825379c31f19
2f0cc8da92be919d10012e6a846de3a6cbdf332c
18026 F20101123_AABBJD manuel_k_Page_09.QC.jpg
3c7bfbf1c93f7084cdfb003ee80f20cd
d3d2a7654051210f845b1c09bede2bca2f7ef494
2247 F20101123_AABBIO manuel_k_Page_91.txt
35fbf22f68a94e63c9cbc554f006f8b7
c7faa380e88c21bd40891e530544aca27d4c6775
5052 F20101123_AABBJE manuel_k_Page_09thm.jpg
049bc12c70bef00526d78a3f0379ed02
168e30372f5c3fa6215e85cf9017ec21feb991b0
747 F20101123_AABBIP manuel_k_Page_93.txt
c33a40b941f74b532710d4be8ae9c897
ea57d6c92e02bc631dbf7ffad9e97a052181d298
11306 F20101123_AABBJF manuel_k_Page_10.QC.jpg
fad2f4152910303b84f885f2ed60ad35
af901a2942f40cbf2771e1437a08a6c17ea0da4b
755877 F20101123_AABBIQ manuel_k.pdf
d8a88a66e03220079ca1be0a53ee6ff7
b05a9dc20e148fe0fb2b0050fc16f3c0170d2bcc
3519 F20101123_AABBJG manuel_k_Page_10thm.jpg
23abd22770eae4ad4c6691203d450a15
51767a07af8fb4fcf8550222229c1e0b3bf9926d
6643 F20101123_AABBIR manuel_k_Page_01.QC.jpg
77089d131a9bd9e62b6a13aa9586b8bd
b91fff891960ca78b72c7bf14dfb77cb3ff5fe7a
20745 F20101123_AABBJH manuel_k_Page_11.QC.jpg
d84f398b47b61e721c85636e5803af7a
4259ccc0265a78e0ddc61f5486c108ff1de09b8f
3349 F20101123_AABBIS manuel_k_Page_02.QC.jpg
937b8b19000cfa48fc892e7fa8a6779c
7fd960e64152b31f491b30c5c79aebfd83ef93ba
5977 F20101123_AABBJI manuel_k_Page_11thm.jpg
a819f5c14c78127f0fe9e1374d961b51
be9866847c67112c7b5a1bc162f1866717bf29f0
15723 F20101123_AABBIT manuel_k_Page_03.QC.jpg
95e3f25ea0d9f04a748759a3a945050f
8204d73b81f43f8f68cc597edc43c99da62d3df0
6707 F20101123_AABBJJ manuel_k_Page_12thm.jpg
2c523eb60f9d1f39a0bc5a164785d410
0324fc3d63a3ec2d4262ecd1f01c9e2400c80041
4509 F20101123_AABBIU manuel_k_Page_03thm.jpg
66c413d329b0cc1690c0146aa241275d
a9088f67d5edf4cdbba7e65587d7e0f08c098c5d
23726 F20101123_AABBJK manuel_k_Page_13.QC.jpg
9bba6b5d904b30e5a326635f4a02ee5e
cbc1aa255cd11e1d956268629a59350d3f5fb3f6
4612 F20101123_AABBIV manuel_k_Page_04thm.jpg
ef20059f436c661838b8f29d2a69f0e5
bff66dea19814d4b9b19c0c9db314d88985f0a36
24663 F20101123_AABBJL manuel_k_Page_14.QC.jpg
8433ecc56102dc96c888d5a9409ff9ab
4b6705f9a5c586d9fe0577d55f0319e1314aee64
3953 F20101123_AABBIW manuel_k_Page_05.QC.jpg
62c7869e741e4255d7a96189e7b6e2f6
b8a41a5d3474fba0f141f97a4918664be10b3ae6
6847 F20101123_AABBJM manuel_k_Page_14thm.jpg
bd0a0cad5880f37e61e345396fcda210
eaf04cb2ad21fd0815b095f40a8625d2c799b9a7
1585 F20101123_AABBIX manuel_k_Page_05thm.jpg
49bed98acfbd638d0f6e8871a84349e0
4f6acf45c22194b58abfc96490d15583ff99ff58
6690 F20101123_AABBKA manuel_k_Page_23thm.jpg
59bc0a0f3ddde25b3b47a6bdf03291e8
7de25899c38e501b351ce70fd0bc9e91f091ed03
24490 F20101123_AABBJN manuel_k_Page_15.QC.jpg
8670eb7a5113550798082abaf205920c
ddd0106289edb229d48b4c56e72aaa5766e5c440
23051 F20101123_AABBIY manuel_k_Page_06.QC.jpg
0eb36bedfccdf257faac892f45b6c6ec
a223470101f6ed0a8a4816525bc1213a8a22f67f
19181 F20101123_AABBKB manuel_k_Page_24.QC.jpg
7c28d0f4e962786cfacf8af6794e4bea
053adfd6b540fff86c7b32a0d5bae490d8e2e8dd
6106 F20101123_AABBIZ manuel_k_Page_06thm.jpg
fe570a34db7d199fd58e96d21776a5fe
c97e42af08bc0a201efcc2a4318d6692a1f26c4c
5456 F20101123_AABBKC manuel_k_Page_24thm.jpg
a808ccca8063ba063ab819e07353073f
3e58e729039f0e7265b072c854000a5aa1dfa99a
6822 F20101123_AABBJO manuel_k_Page_15thm.jpg
12b05d04ef203f7c4a445c9946de878e
46770d728143c1c75a8ec6c0b759d86cbdc6438e
21968 F20101123_AABBKD manuel_k_Page_26.QC.jpg
23169772a752fd47880c9689f614b2cb
ba46a640cd325018c53d99f0c6e158583c6b45af
23069 F20101123_AABBJP manuel_k_Page_16.QC.jpg
729fb752c61a0b9ea061e848f39f4fb5
85b9796a88722182834a3d963b86d12fe1b48a74
6166 F20101123_AABBKE manuel_k_Page_26thm.jpg
2b02b86929b6f7da8b90957d32839bcd
6806c6dbf94d51a1266c837ab08784be38e93c99
6645 F20101123_AABBJQ manuel_k_Page_16thm.jpg
392d3bd190fa0371937490f29ad6014b
6eea9aeaa9e9d07681af61b432fdf9f0e26da593
22858 F20101123_AABBKF manuel_k_Page_27.QC.jpg
872478485bffa493a7585a1d14a7d35b
7c9b7600c498b1a33b0d977c8b43a28a153c856a
18435 F20101123_AABBJR manuel_k_Page_17.QC.jpg
17a5ff3b7dc1d4965ebbf674255f4193
d5715b854746438107beddf2cfa1711560073e6b
23395 F20101123_AABBKG manuel_k_Page_28.QC.jpg
ecd32ce4710475cd38209a21075dda19
427d961e554584a22b908782c63e1390b25f875d
5482 F20101123_AABBJS manuel_k_Page_17thm.jpg
40ec2e3cd4be2a30538b92a172f12ca1
bc5f0adb3d35d2e2e9940fe18876364703f1f0a5
6500 F20101123_AABBKH manuel_k_Page_28thm.jpg
84e92bbb682af273e8d0fc2258af8459
f0cd81c223713a7d2c641162d446caf551b00b88
22386 F20101123_AABBJT manuel_k_Page_19.QC.jpg
cab55dd4ad0d407a1294cdc81b547b87
372851fbe2db5897b4e01aeab5f9494f64660b45
23826 F20101123_AABBKI manuel_k_Page_29.QC.jpg
a63044cc220f769b588c08e843b06793
3ebf81b7b96bbae7ed4a43b3a488998e42d2cf0f
6108 F20101123_AABBJU manuel_k_Page_19thm.jpg
7d3030dda6b853db7c75786e62356a04
ec5ef401dfb2171bdf0cc4470502e69b3acbf3c5
24247 F20101123_AABBKJ manuel_k_Page_32.QC.jpg
044d57b5c146c37e458e1594d3c43f42
cd91d5e4ceb41be98e01cad691ebf0a6a2e3b4dd
24975 F20101123_AABBJV manuel_k_Page_20.QC.jpg
7e483ec038713725532fa8571b311957
db8a774ece30a0f7d4b59b64fb38ebc56ec1905a
6684 F20101123_AABBKK manuel_k_Page_32thm.jpg
adb2dc384a272135af8de66e0605aede
d702a32e53351f411e4416c15e1303500537eb8c
6447 F20101123_AABBJW manuel_k_Page_21thm.jpg
618220e32f21315f21fbbe8a7fbf0dd2
d4a85b78c1a34030db0153c4d3844a39bf328000
20307 F20101123_AABBKL manuel_k_Page_35.QC.jpg
5cd9bfb131c81612d12b85c021b37f5f
33cbf3772f916e82f0371688ce8b4687ac70dbbc
23296 F20101123_AABBJX manuel_k_Page_22.QC.jpg
0b3c9e5cc2179cb43a429452e7c1da73
24678c24ed2327309f41a0c76e07e8baeea3bac5
22474 F20101123_AABBLA manuel_k_Page_43.QC.jpg
fd9a56e408f2a400efee9fb5ad363634
e455f57d6160b92757c5648e6f37bd7733f219bb
5703 F20101123_AABBKM manuel_k_Page_35thm.jpg
36ca37010f40c3826e41ad80cfa21ecb
484fbc5734ec2143d60ccdd70af999d97d9b3402
6633 F20101123_AABBJY manuel_k_Page_22thm.jpg
0551cf13cb6e9cf51cabd9f69bb8e7d1
c43a0ad8ba4c5ce5b1cf836e3841793099a4bbf5
6316 F20101123_AABBLB manuel_k_Page_43thm.jpg
68f02bb01ba1e62fff28f7993a05ee05
7d2b4b29d45ed08d01062b831b5ea289a8910059
22109 F20101123_AABBKN manuel_k_Page_36.QC.jpg
018997cd852cc1a6bbaeb573e03157f1
35aa5f8281864d485efe96df5c1bfdd2a816f461
24234 F20101123_AABBJZ manuel_k_Page_23.QC.jpg
dba864024b944b5d85f3ced61d7c639f
d34fb56490b25145b0e4ed953f59eacc5a2d1795
6537 F20101123_AABBLC manuel_k_Page_44thm.jpg
e3512953b3db9d794296c2b15d214fd0
b6b44d35d933c2fb28f0e428ad2827834f77ecb1
23761 F20101123_AABBKO manuel_k_Page_37.QC.jpg
ac269675a21b4890b08e1855b9b624c9
9e1dfb8ed1beab8dc67ec7d258ed2a1eecba2c26
23867 F20101123_AABBLD manuel_k_Page_45.QC.jpg
1a1ceb38c19b509d5a2666f50632ba1e
c2912fa205a1b0e31a47f66fa4a5a72300ce510b
6729 F20101123_AABBLE manuel_k_Page_45thm.jpg
ff80d1d03cd0d731b1a89762ef23d197
cb1c50ae93a779e2c446912dc655e439b1cd9556
6650 F20101123_AABBKP manuel_k_Page_37thm.jpg
0c25f3486099d093b8d3c267e84719fe
e635f6062bdbea4fcf4ec5a48687e9247e8e20f8
22400 F20101123_AABBLF manuel_k_Page_46.QC.jpg
4b6449531818e3a273e2ad9f3a99f40d
3c1cbff89b2f80e64f09e4c26e31107fdcfc5f0b
18557 F20101123_AABBKQ manuel_k_Page_38.QC.jpg
323711b161ac1952ce3830d1940ddb2a
92df2ca4cf17817ed711ee85c647671b765b5490
6314 F20101123_AABBLG manuel_k_Page_46thm.jpg
ad604bfa02c8b23326b89a32d16b52ee
12d20f3fb956ffff47b2883526e52315475f3e56
5673 F20101123_AABBKR manuel_k_Page_38thm.jpg
44ec69c9f8d4162800c1d4f4d0502e5b
2f716beb1e04b453cf0f493acb587fe444274155
23106 F20101123_AABBLH manuel_k_Page_48.QC.jpg
7bdf9e579635da2cbee581d020f3b41b
8c94006a4ef87263ef775c9a9a607a91827b2b73
16360 F20101123_AABBKS manuel_k_Page_39.QC.jpg
288158928bbd59e664a3193c40b661a4
234470206c85ea5eae4759e52975f817271335bc
6049 F20101123_AABBLI manuel_k_Page_48thm.jpg
8f795b46dd61ea8cbf2382c6c1d35359
7bc0c41a706ffa2d0df3fc6edcd42cb7ee0432eb
5049 F20101123_AABBKT manuel_k_Page_39thm.jpg
b9e2c632377c5c856771c6d69a06bdbe
46d4aaa25c7d3fb4089265d62c1ac383103355c3
18621 F20101123_AABBLJ manuel_k_Page_49.QC.jpg
65a6fcb093f3c396dc2f7959570dd7ad
a4e6a2403a1442a9b8dbafa625ff552cf20a14fa
25955 F20101123_AABBKU manuel_k_Page_40.QC.jpg
72e86d75e2ca7c039f0383d35460b29e
27b1c4c57f515910ba19d80c210336c249cecb28
5067 F20101123_AABBLK manuel_k_Page_49thm.jpg
7b5c00bc114ea9ff1013eab01a4453aa
bdf57fc329b6876f41884049ae31d280f5f842f7
6954 F20101123_AABBKV manuel_k_Page_40thm.jpg
512e96c1b9735ecbb1a9966d186c782a
a6f4e8d36e7044a6ff68712364c68190329dbbf6
22489 F20101123_AABBLL manuel_k_Page_50.QC.jpg
3bcaa3d0c5bde7f10dde212693edb71d
213c34e10e91f022680c46799e6d6b2ed3e588c4
22342 F20101123_AABBKW manuel_k_Page_41.QC.jpg
91951279399259636caf9017d70e3dde
13ccfcb8cdd910f5d27b29206195829c25f5da21
6811 F20101123_AABBMA manuel_k_Page_61thm.jpg
1bc06cf4a358bc1ccf7c3e96b2573479
9c670522e063ea138307df02703efbc4c2ef2326
6249 F20101123_AABBLM manuel_k_Page_50thm.jpg
3f3592dbcb09db913e88023ae28ad66a
8962e2897708ceef1fe10e5d64ddb2ff700d8444
6100 F20101123_AABBKX manuel_k_Page_41thm.jpg
70d7cdd8a4adb9d4b858260fef34938a
06fe01942d7fcbe6e5208b55c893e9d6f40f603f
23357 F20101123_AABBMB manuel_k_Page_62.QC.jpg
c0ec80faab798a454a49c9d4aeb8e676
30ed254e865fb9b03b7a72f544ecc1112be87ea5
23438 F20101123_AABBLN manuel_k_Page_51.QC.jpg
90629b317d0d382e63c784ff888ad1ec
8d2f69e6f3348cebbe9d511fe0f3f50372acd866
22177 F20101123_AABBKY manuel_k_Page_42.QC.jpg
5b0ccb19d146f12b2a5a8bca5f250f00
72feca60ec0de6247e86e7a22a71df09402a9504
22310 F20101123_AABBMC manuel_k_Page_63.QC.jpg
ce1bf6dcaa83247f105e6baccad59a07
4837ee861c4aa3e2e79fb5ec664b8f4721c71f4f
6520 F20101123_AABBLO manuel_k_Page_51thm.jpg
2f0db3cde0ad29ccc6f4405545dba2ce
573fbf88d0c9ffed00447b1f062ad0b93790c2aa
6141 F20101123_AABBKZ manuel_k_Page_42thm.jpg
81efd2701830c3506c1b3a3e5aa901bc
3fce10799dba20193763f3432412e1fcbf2f4895
6413 F20101123_AABBMD manuel_k_Page_63thm.jpg
8307ec42c98bccdfdaa03cbab04b800d
60c59d19977937ceb1cf487417d9d7bfade81f5c
18518 F20101123_AABBLP manuel_k_Page_52.QC.jpg
8126f85a6e6a0bfcdd013d4463720547
9d1effe023b44cda14265abc2ea5da69c379f468
23353 F20101123_AABBME manuel_k_Page_64.QC.jpg
9d0d272d96e545b0ae6afdc5f03690fa
be5a7f67a1cbf96fae22911da0c9c9ebb82d8cd7
22777 F20101123_AABBMF manuel_k_Page_65.QC.jpg
3335ee6f8aa3f48838a6ca370794f051
64d1048c56a61eb9d7a5d14a5c5e94c70de3d9a6
5370 F20101123_AABBLQ manuel_k_Page_52thm.jpg
7d3ad64b3bb0e49e19ae2a99583aa7bc
84d310cf5c5e75587b29d7b7039dc02fe1bca1ee
6414 F20101123_AABBMG manuel_k_Page_65thm.jpg
68c0508cb470edd76c8b87e164a7aad5
b9792f770845015c4120241722dfe8a4ffa1d527
19972 F20101123_AABBLR manuel_k_Page_53.QC.jpg
5ca151da42d339d593f50f9743372647
bdea00207b21259576c87a5aa0b7ddde0d365614
19861 F20101123_AABBMH manuel_k_Page_66.QC.jpg
70f035bd36a08b9e25fe9fd386ba1ff7
ee76215939e2ec94b2a953e382b4bbdfc80f4675
5954 F20101123_AABBLS manuel_k_Page_53thm.jpg
d6c7c34a1c406fbe92abb991868a7915
6dbfb55206bf1689912010b13f102f3add312327
5745 F20101123_AABBMI manuel_k_Page_66thm.jpg
ca1532412e53e569a7807dec281652ed
e45aeda8afbadf89b0042193bbd038d9b00bbf14
21230 F20101123_AABBLT manuel_k_Page_54.QC.jpg
80c97eb47fe9d25af216da06cd56b303
d9fa91844ac2df5eda867ae2be1cb0883ed98540
23525 F20101123_AABBMJ manuel_k_Page_67.QC.jpg
e85c74475a36d3c881c3c81e2d07637f
55bace69bea60d7c28612b74dc11ae398ea33cb7
6188 F20101123_AABBLU manuel_k_Page_54thm.jpg
cd4437c593af59da26f4a1f674579ee0
40791b0b097d0749ff968d556342c1f65522ca08
6460 F20101123_AABBMK manuel_k_Page_67thm.jpg
815cc30535bbcec0f016656718ea7693
3b76a440690323177678d1c645ffde9684d67b9b
15144 F20101123_AABBLV manuel_k_Page_56.QC.jpg
87d48c2e7f7b1cd93bf5d89060707dc5
f1f3d7ac1eb5a68199d9235ecec5b71bfcb91174
4236 F20101123_AABBML manuel_k_Page_68.QC.jpg
7a4cd0f6430db4e10d8c91a5a67b635c
22af27740ab1d0ac225bb8abfd64d3e5f6436f59
24499 F20101123_AABBLW manuel_k_Page_57.QC.jpg
6460a67366b040e75d8a282f07174b2a
479460c26f5ab1f639eefbdc6ee9358844cb9a6f
1630 F20101123_AABBMM manuel_k_Page_68thm.jpg
19d6e104c2626357ef1fe62aa60c442b
3a1b2eb56a59b8bf82b90b8e6f4e99486de8c52e
6800 F20101123_AABBLX manuel_k_Page_57thm.jpg
a1275fb8b9ec770b6610b4278c94bcce
829d4935da7c5f3bc49afe9a1b2b41abef8fd583
21248 F20101123_AABBNA manuel_k_Page_78.QC.jpg
0001bada69157a207a1a747d450568f7
cf8881a5b532125bfa93a1f68717644d59d533ff
5796 F20101123_AABBMN manuel_k_Page_69thm.jpg
52307fcfe6b8a23029f0c8c655a455e6
355895c2c6c9a867a0b1a94dad41b583989e7fce
22490 F20101123_AABBLY manuel_k_Page_58.QC.jpg
34b9f7fa16ccec7c58b177b3271aafc8
a491616423bd630cbfb1bc38142b8aee23e34480
6076 F20101123_AABBNB manuel_k_Page_78thm.jpg
d05cd7f00fec5e144d63b6a0b9daced5
7a695f719bdedf739826b6811939dca0bb1234b4
24711 F20101123_AABBMO manuel_k_Page_70.QC.jpg
8854a66198330d97bd5cb34c787328db
da0e1a495adc59b7b23d4fbaf3f9e3c730ed8300
25103 F20101123_AABBLZ manuel_k_Page_61.QC.jpg
8e7d173ce5e0fbf119832e3a0d3d31e3
eef1288b146b47e1a9542fd22ec2f2d707644c65
6596 F20101123_AABBNC manuel_k_Page_79thm.jpg
58ba9fe399a3f15b290df5170218e5af
16d3d705f29ddf29d6f77d54376311a0f6ac13e5
6673 F20101123_AABBMP manuel_k_Page_70thm.jpg
c0a87aa31108ba7c084ad414201c4849
0d967a96e64b6ee6d82b97354a2028b832ce488c
6232 F20101123_AABBND manuel_k_Page_80thm.jpg
c6c6e9a59b471d70429ba6b173c8f73c
146a79fe59ee432e8d99fe3220aa73cfa934fc09
23788 F20101123_AABBMQ manuel_k_Page_71.QC.jpg
38412e4365697a43dc123e73627cbd92
85c631d0c94f9b9d290070d2cce3a4cb599a8fdf
24091 F20101123_AABBNE manuel_k_Page_82.QC.jpg
5938a133c258ad9dd5811cfb65c97108
3ec5ae6df795e7b20904457abe0cbc4ea87e9b0e
6468 F20101123_AABBNF manuel_k_Page_82thm.jpg
877330c6b6f2fde82d428372d5b995f3
6a6357607e1dfe541a2e1c40cc4d6deb25dd9932
6774 F20101123_AABBMR manuel_k_Page_71thm.jpg
25a6b0b733219f489c6c20b96048f3c8
79a369d20c0e89365d2e8e988a8b5fdcc48c86c7
22241 F20101123_AABBNG manuel_k_Page_83.QC.jpg
886c797674788a26ebdf99e75385e2b1
9bb03b6ec564adcd9ecb8f07a308227cc4cdda41
F20101123_AABBMS manuel_k_Page_72.QC.jpg
67701380ca399a75f88f77649b0f70f9
c2b10fe01169790ef1285d068d56fbe1717d8bc6
6416 F20101123_AABBNH manuel_k_Page_83thm.jpg
3d037a0322a3a8d1179a60c09fbf46f3
04bd7508664fd54eb4f55e78108c99f80325efd7
6548 F20101123_AABBNI manuel_k_Page_84thm.jpg
b25a3e666b0479c1418a55e452f225cb
175308881f9b1be86824857b35e586b444623b53
23451 F20101123_AABBMT manuel_k_Page_73.QC.jpg
ec42a8ae2fcba210b2e24f79d921668a
98f134752a14cf28525069321faae0f7b887d7c9
21270 F20101123_AABBNJ manuel_k_Page_85.QC.jpg
171c47887ee13bc0db99bba779139883
add1b4d6779e9431f96b5c765183df2687d022e3
6387 F20101123_AABBMU manuel_k_Page_73thm.jpg
671f330cf1874fa12e1d7d49292b7ebf
ecbc66bf39d882096a565d45e8468882ba47be50
F20101123_AABBNK manuel_k_Page_85thm.jpg
48403e4dd0c1bb61ba3db927ad67fd81
674b455dfb72da09697bd5ce71e1d623507508b4
6426 F20101123_AABBMV manuel_k_Page_74thm.jpg
9c69ee15f26611e195a3fe05f7aefc71
6985e94eae13fcdcc862a095aa79969b12152c8a
1654 F20101123_AABBNL manuel_k_Page_86thm.jpg
2561eb02ad409f8ea616cfcb89885aa4
a4fdbde8cbf44ce4a48f21a65a7d8b042182b620
22796 F20101123_AABBMW manuel_k_Page_75.QC.jpg
2a51d7c2622025e07c1015d8d95c37ea
99e9e2c439d9ec9e4a7e7f06a37d8d44dfd253f0
5710 F20101123_AABBNM manuel_k_Page_87thm.jpg
97e0fb065e1ef5e7802c1b8ecf88f6e6
74b403af74dac717b2b9b6e7bf0fbabc06a7562a
6251 F20101123_AABBMX manuel_k_Page_75thm.jpg
4430bb4415e2f6f11c575e99f68b69bf
aca3402a3219b62eea67422a44611f15defcec76
23180 F20101123_AABBNN manuel_k_Page_88.QC.jpg
03f283baf550347c86059a7143ff5d61
9f762b67f31ae253978ce64950107c036304a08b
22918 F20101123_AABBMY manuel_k_Page_77.QC.jpg
30778a10dc66ceb5ac4aaf02f3905f3e
8a50e2a8d93a5bf33b1aa0e4c6f03a7f82c28cd7
6528 F20101123_AABBNO manuel_k_Page_88thm.jpg
d4f4b9917df8ab7aecc505f2ee067e12
5fdec13bbab74201983a6adc0c5147867f8f0649
6192 F20101123_AABBMZ manuel_k_Page_77thm.jpg
c43de749d22d4b33e2ca3cd7420196f5
53f7cc3bcb8e173e932fc2ab9a5f79ef0a29db63
10728 F20101123_AABBNP manuel_k_Page_89.QC.jpg
63ec636c87a600dbc4e5f03423b98de2
8f779b6ea00d707b19c3d3d3ac362e9dba7c1ea8
3424 F20101123_AABBNQ manuel_k_Page_89thm.jpg
41587ce1a1cae39cdeddff5d0ec7e30a
f0be75d6e704e736a5f18ddf80b1b16d6542cffa
19127 F20101123_AABBNR manuel_k_Page_90.QC.jpg
f1729547853c02f4b77314e2df7a6246
cfc2dca2b5d377f8172169ac48cf6ce3feb1353c
5426 F20101123_AABBNS manuel_k_Page_90thm.jpg
3f9b24e335d2b65699887a170a33353e
1ca71b55b71cb6ad2ffa78a70c77a9df4ddda01e
23167 F20101123_AABBNT manuel_k_Page_91.QC.jpg
c87b9f18301832f97f007e81fe34e0a1
bfaca318c233ce86cf6b432b5bae271be142aefd
6365 F20101123_AABBNU manuel_k_Page_91thm.jpg
453f14d125df99b9f7a87205173ff019
df5d09f94efdc04c868c527bde95ab7d194782b7
18501 F20101123_AABBNV manuel_k_Page_92.QC.jpg
7b100dc815a9a45ead3e143b91364b7e
866b72847263115f9cd928c3cf2feeaf59f2d939
10231 F20101123_AABBNW manuel_k_Page_93.QC.jpg
2680703497d7115366e5ff8e68234373
bb4e3d6f47c53ff84a87bd4d3a0d55e683e0df0c
3185 F20101123_AABBNX manuel_k_Page_93thm.jpg
3169e50858c3ae7588639fec25510394
3a967db018fd7b1c038d135a507c2423b4ad8f6e
108243 F20101123_AABBNY UFE0011650_00001.mets FULL
4d314f49ecc4d894082bf555f52a65cd
c1507356612cbbb5c591d1908621a9cd92c807f5
73542 F20101123_AABAPA manuel_k_Page_82.jpg
9a5c86f8ec780472baff44ca10e1b5df
ab780534523ef9e60da69d41bcf6aeaf706e442e
66126 F20101123_AABAPB manuel_k_Page_80.jpg
42d0d9acb293912a806abc9d6294eb81
da73b6436369f09db50d1b026ce440c519f74025
94443 F20101123_AABAPC manuel_k_Page_69.jp2
74e506f8a830f96990a3fea08508a5cf
fb9cbd1993ee002f76b32233a513c341f7571b11
20739 F20101123_AABAPD manuel_k_Page_55.QC.jpg
cd22924ece8c5f1009735e5eaba507ae
10ec8058ed7365be3cef5d61bc881b02ec5f5de2
101148 F20101123_AABAPE manuel_k_Page_83.jp2
95a3bf1d8e1f5483183bd68c314b8a4d
02e5bfbeade51327b908471f31374b2d1b24d822
6730 F20101123_AABAPF manuel_k_Page_72thm.jpg
3a78bced279d52cacb056ce7c6177b25
50b862c564d94e7ac5e35f29c0a3bf5bffe173ce
21857 F20101123_AABAPG manuel_k_Page_80.QC.jpg
9fb13cefece77f137b43227ef7808194
e6f08616951b622c2af562220e553c328e96d359
6498 F20101123_AABAPH manuel_k_Page_27thm.jpg
f5a2afc0b351bb419af617c1b6d21116
d2e2995bfe98af9ea0e31bc62d518e5df4e313e8
1053954 F20101123_AABAOT manuel_k_Page_51.tif
3cc706691ba7447c6b7d7ac1253b7125
77b5cce3acadfa4fb1fa0d76e4d8e2b1cc31bf28
16643 F20101123_AABAPI manuel_k_Page_04.QC.jpg
f6f25dc5e617225e74f5adb7d34d0122
f67a3f0352dd4348fa7a1480c145b1636412e39f
46266 F20101123_AABAPJ manuel_k_Page_54.pro
ad05d28c65692bb5458a51dead97312b
b5441955061dec41cf8c9f803df2d720b9e9585a
22970 F20101123_AABAOU manuel_k_Page_79.QC.jpg
7cdc53de466809ef86e1de9897c75e6d
d8258ebddc3df10e6cec6ed460a88a3521cfe1c6
5065 F20101123_AABAPK manuel_k_Page_92thm.jpg
81dc286ed9b77208680feb108b018e94
22b114e203f9d178a57da5a39a5db68e39edcda6
3612 F20101123_AABAOV manuel_k_Page_47thm.jpg
f21ffae164bcd6416f31bd1fce39c458
deaccff6f166b1687af0edc114c5c2b05fefc49e
62966 F20101123_AABAPL manuel_k_Page_70.pro
01941574c860cc942a33463fddc38bee
67723111230151e1a77798a71c5e0ab5fb6c8377
22336 F20101123_AABAOW manuel_k_Page_74.QC.jpg
f2a40b214d7dc3947bb7f74c2e76ce37
21d107cbbdb5a311e8b82a35a0adab58d849c873
81120 F20101123_AABAQA manuel_k_Page_32.jpg
897ad24af413f54d646e850803adcab4
4529eebd55d2d564dc349693495410918cc5bc5f
6185 F20101123_AABAPM manuel_k_Page_25thm.jpg
baf0c85da256066deb47a1b9bb830ca6
ce4afa186e260771b421646965a42883b2a2b5e1
5441 F20101123_AABAOX manuel_k_Page_81thm.jpg
faa82f5f326a3908f5ca50760f53dafb
78465ede2f0977807eb0594ba4109d745d622847
47806 F20101123_AABAQB manuel_k_Page_74.pro
141d9c9d366fb98039b83628096abe32
ec4de8b6bbc04dfe098e639fd8b5f65ebecf2449
F20101123_AABAPN manuel_k_Page_83.tif
9cec4caec3df04b042014fcecb1d3a1f
66329354515200aebb618cb4a2a503816704a9c4
2220 F20101123_AABAOY manuel_k_Page_36.txt
8fef5b722a87e55ee7553a331f8caea0
0bd3e10c2465c3ca8ad58445f7fd20c1ed44ec20
F20101123_AABAQC manuel_k_Page_21.tif
2848be6312d07ece9b826ff148b10f97
5a180f527903f338e5033c3fceacfc499dbe971a
49862 F20101123_AABAPO manuel_k_Page_58.pro
1feab0b1cc73c80985b4203d3e8270f6
35b3e287aa9ab7306f44c06fdd361d1404d498f2
126728 F20101123_AABAOZ manuel_k_Page_61.jp2
a8fffa92c8b19de28e16dbfbc449f2a0
5a529b5c4c6ec4830c89c61d450840dc7ad07616
F20101123_AABAQD manuel_k_Page_32.tif
387427f0526e5c6af535142d2ebc416b
e9b2b4fa9cbab4223115a7caf093ae102812b0c5
8423998 F20101123_AABAPP manuel_k_Page_49.tif
cbdb1b4a204ee8382d46f968ebfe7338
a3a35929ac5f3457b28ff73f9798ce4f72adbb90
22061 F20101123_AABAQE manuel_k_Page_18.QC.jpg
575164208f85172be038a0540d4f14eb
2e9261148c1ccad2caa4bc4c32beb82500caa148
F20101123_AABAPQ manuel_k_Page_56.txt
d0dcd5f368b19791d32415449854138a
468a35fbade6b17be6342e96fcc5435016243521
F20101123_AABAQF manuel_k_Page_12.tif
9417cd5ab76524383d940d67875c2e18
6d3017be12d3139ad9f47646d3981e2e64430031
45630 F20101123_AABAPR manuel_k_Page_80.pro
74cfc6b51d94d6f5a8ac2fe19eeffe7a
7417071a491668676e06ccb52d28ae536d67e530
21623 F20101123_AABAQG manuel_k_Page_34.QC.jpg
ad098dba68bce4dd73caa7622c08ebdc
845e75a67d931c6fa6069ade5ab9c782b9ea6702
2127 F20101123_AABAPS manuel_k_Page_42.txt
df9dea646cfe846abf1d44baa88b7edf
9ec722c82bb126af005c546af4279eaee194124d
115174 F20101123_AABAQH manuel_k_Page_45.jp2
4d50f68beee1f8190e5ec272d3c050d2
70c6b650760f4db7f1815745a8b2ed2df7d35323
1644 F20101123_AABAPT manuel_k_Page_24.txt
97d9c5268ed5632744b6e109c99bbeaf
6c1139d5f5c2ce1216ba27c767c3e4d429554f97
25271604 F20101123_AABAQI manuel_k_Page_07.tif
b5f1d2e817d35939bf1c35bc78ba81ed
f73eacb0a5723a8a221fa6e24ca13d8274e567c9
56158 F20101123_AABAPU manuel_k_Page_45.pro
6a0af94a51cedfb440c50928dccdc15d
4137cd693800e470dc85b5ef4f9faecd7119ef27
6228 F20101123_AABAQJ manuel_k_Page_58thm.jpg
4f2808c4ac7cf9c4f5a4ccaeba344f03
257f6b3b489f77c613b0e4f2f3785458d7704af0
6534 F20101123_AABAQK manuel_k_Page_13thm.jpg
5c58afada3b49bf1bbec39c0ac8be928
8f586ac4f8a1ce1cdd94d448154d9924c17bef9f
39591 F20101123_AABAPV manuel_k_Page_17.pro
abd9ea18bdb4136ba3e2b164776ce4c7
05bc0e7186472baf8be63e9ab74c52a8a670a542
22739 F20101123_AABAQL manuel_k_Page_76.QC.jpg
1c89952c31193185a6d4337d76a46845
1b0f17f9b3e8d83b3365f4d77ff754926790344e
34743 F20101123_AABAPW manuel_k_Page_49.pro
e66e43bfba3cbaaad2eae2f8132653f8
13def44731412454b4715e709d0b3546a31f6cb6
68741 F20101123_AABAQM manuel_k_Page_03.jp2
af5d42b31ca10bf67a27927e116d3033
d2ea5287e81cecef2202d8531eb5a766866e3a0e
20447 F20101123_AABAPX manuel_k_Page_87.QC.jpg
d1756c39fafe927155dd7d407e6264f8
9745c0a150c8c829d7487de9d8d9dd16c2623bdc
F20101123_AABARA manuel_k_Page_22.tif
4aba768615dfca0d5d5717e30046b183
5c21988b6d23e1a15be0ed51f2dd76c8f70efb79
1963 F20101123_AABAQN manuel_k_Page_88.txt
41d2ba05a6bc74411c057e6ca82e082a
780787b0923d03f03d8d53f03362970e7422cecf
74489 F20101123_AABAPY manuel_k_Page_37.jpg
1cf437b894e655610521742c23184222
f85c6c0ff2a9f5f0ac53121aac2dc0b42d5fadd6
113534 F20101123_AABARB manuel_k_Page_72.jp2
4d2e7475fadb8860e103b96cdfaf8729
07a893a24ac9c760d2726eb6fb8ad8e9bfe93a1f
61152 F20101123_AABAQO manuel_k_Page_24.jpg
6ea7128a4355052ba7f31ecea92536c1
0b3e697a5808121c6ad01d0236511eb4418d8800
82431 F20101123_AABAPZ manuel_k_Page_09.jp2
7a39b3342739afdf845903401cec2d77
1f5fc33ee2ce7f3afd4dc9f1abd07ecd4e5d159c
F20101123_AABARC manuel_k_Page_14.tif
343b4e30798dc7ccfab56e2afa9d8270
4e70c8a84353a450963f0a6237b2276c5128f725
110246 F20101123_AABAQP manuel_k_Page_16.jp2
e1b9edf1df8dd915a909284c7966cad7
8ee900aa47bc7df372e765d5245b5cceafa068a6
69814 F20101123_AABARD manuel_k_Page_41.jpg
698987f515babd8b1f82ef52e1a19fb8
612b6a0277e568bcc1b7bae3a896da8fb00f26d9
57750 F20101123_AABAQQ manuel_k_Page_15.pro
a9937dbd0ab77c7707e64600eb8e5614
c1d2781ed5349005bedc4dd0dd81e3286ccb34de
4916 F20101123_AABARE manuel_k_Page_56thm.jpg
bd7dfdab7cfdd4ea7ac8ad968391ad92
40d016650e0c3e7a1630ea1cc7af6f68e94c354d
2503 F20101123_AABAQR manuel_k_Page_06.txt
7ae3ce5a174e66866adeac64c5d7301c
689de6bf3c6c5867c9fea66d55d440a9e93b7416
6501 F20101123_AABARF manuel_k_Page_64thm.jpg
f746c981b241f8034eed4b304cb1964f
7148882f26753adadcc441ab16d505d270e156df
6136 F20101123_AABAQS manuel_k_Page_34thm.jpg
4546588900855a8650162c78c53bcbec
6953e2d12eb3de889f423348eb88e82f5030605f
1411 F20101123_AABARG manuel_k_Page_02thm.jpg
1fe1ae1452fb2d2fa80d62f9ce736d93
8ce3784bedcdfe36edd8486db92c123ebddf1426
F20101123_AABAQT manuel_k_Page_26.tif
397556a35b76288790a2ab2e520eb1a2
ce61783d38c50bba560d7e9118e77c2bdc656323
6782 F20101123_AABARH manuel_k_Page_20thm.jpg
7e83859269a9d0294961a45a0b263226
9ecb0aae258f363d43c316c9e5e5d1a90ec7003e
21229 F20101123_AABAQU manuel_k_Page_59.QC.jpg
fac594f36f61ff182440f067c7f8bb8b
3bd36e801cf26ec4e059e31f30821eb765fc3dc7
F20101123_AABARI manuel_k_Page_25.tif
aeae316fc6ace38915face4a3150d9a0
fcf26028718ea00a99d784e3bf65f878dcf9c675
F20101123_AABAQV manuel_k_Page_93.tif
de3374dc8b50f2eae897f6e4f7e9e41a
4a65f44befd8e294912bb7baa8705f9a60748510
24501 F20101123_AABARJ manuel_k_Page_30.QC.jpg
4e5518067f80cea69c64ca56b777d1ca
a6f6ef342ba6e28d3327675f1666150d5582baa8
119463 F20101123_AABARK manuel_k_Page_31.jp2
94fa42b1f297021796d0aee2ea172838
314e085677c7b01462de8dc6b1d789609df92265
51728 F20101123_AABAQW manuel_k_Page_59.pro
282f344413b175997a5a09575317d3fd
3b2eacfed8f390fd93478ca4c2a2493f3bfa62d5
52857 F20101123_AABARL manuel_k_Page_75.pro
6d5493cf80b73ba015f92939a5e2d7b2
127eeab559f1867d9bb8c6eddd6df1db38464e24
57369 F20101123_AABAQX manuel_k_Page_38.jpg
d0dd58ee0cb2072bef61a46e49ded328
20aeff638f8b789598f8152e517005f2a7cf6528
867 F20101123_AABASA manuel_k_Page_10.txt
66cdb3343f5d4761977e943ef709ba69
c201af9e277300d464eee45311a4a4fad8d2c7cc
49291 F20101123_AABARM manuel_k_Page_84.pro
f1277569e75568cb35d3e1557692023f
4da35184d0aeaaa9b423ed09a1f216bd5380cbdf
51370 F20101123_AABAQY manuel_k_Page_33.pro
97359760dc90ea0ffe96369c2df3641d
cc5d82d423d8cd8c420462c6bd1b9e520e1f5363
F20101123_AABASB manuel_k_Page_55.tif
3ea52a036a881fc842210b2598719d30
1b6cdb4022d618a03254cc39173def5b9e7d5a61
38206 F20101123_AABARN manuel_k_Page_47.jpg
9cd4abfcfd3346fb0557fc4acbfee21d
97bf234619f1c604766aaf571fb0ef8385cf1a55
111300 F20101123_AABAQZ manuel_k_Page_44.jp2
08f21f6983b47002cec3f6845a4ff643
943e4348bf795fd9f4d5f6df4433a94c7b47841f
8704 F20101123_AABASC manuel_k_Page_08.pro
5035ebfccaea0b293f1c70ef898d1832
b2c5e53aaed1dadb7f78a2d9175c4c994cc602f9
F20101123_AABARO manuel_k_Page_63.tif
83f7ce38bb7f8c51db51c50a278bd462
98fe666e086aaccd03e8a775b910500dec1f1ad2
6386 F20101123_AABASD manuel_k_Page_36thm.jpg
dc33f64c5ab4cdf82f320aee5d390251
22e8e56ca948f20a569566aaf5b0597c7162f892
64568 F20101123_AABARP manuel_k_Page_90.jpg
3b95a92af807c36747f2f7c22847a4de
09cc6f3b282baa85c97826c45d6de66ba7f84413
F20101123_AABASE manuel_k_Page_73.tif
eb377e719bdef66b03df4a68d1e9d1d9
f84b2c168e7fa5444434b5be5e51242c92fe6103
23864 F20101123_AABARQ manuel_k_Page_31.QC.jpg
765800e029a9f4c305a9a0da413eaa90
77067c10417e6667f5c87f9eb65f3dbef829812a
F20101123_AABASF manuel_k_Page_77.tif
013825d82593be389aa59f4efb4f3643
dd5c956e005ab134cb94e6322a2248ad26277783
F20101123_AABARR manuel_k_Page_80.tif
581c9c27fcb050adb6fa52a754c13a13
ad1b4a898be4f0a06bcb4ae3143b7e1b491fc63b
110960 F20101123_AABASG manuel_k_Page_29.jp2
574795e12ca3535b55a4f0af5857caa8
c247b1a8e573c4b59390922ea6aa9e701a41d16c
23490 F20101123_AABARS manuel_k_Page_44.QC.jpg
75e722538cbd4bfa5637631ed3a0890d
0410ef0fe25972871fab88e8227cbb88f4529530
6553 F20101123_AABASH manuel_k_Page_76thm.jpg
39410fea8bc14c6a7e099a96099ce818
f1e4a27b2a187971f308025274ebc5fa0d197b46
12435 F20101123_AABART manuel_k_Page_47.QC.jpg
5496fb860872f1be8f4794841b19b320
4eb06d7e0d71b78629ac23689a11b06c524684f0
24116 F20101123_AABASI manuel_k_Page_21.QC.jpg
253793b0f9314a8745ee570d4fd6bc63
c5c03c157f73d280c662f2f579a7d1673f419d50
13341 F20101123_AABARU manuel_k_Page_86.jpg
f3db71ae6d784950d1cab1b4a6d2f72b
eb3c1905599891178991839da31c6e2e90731cc2
73697 F20101123_AABASJ manuel_k_Page_60.jpg
278f56f36f3249f0692e72bbbf8ea9f7
4951314f18ba517ffbc47a26516567cddba24300
5895 F20101123_AABARV manuel_k_Page_55thm.jpg
6db61544cd9c81c5e9f8648bccaa9bf3
838f0fbd23475c01535d9315e600b6bd54a45daa
65103 F20101123_AABASK manuel_k_Page_69.jpg
c69d6401b49b29c55895a1cb549102cc
91b05979c34281ba3b4d68d82fdd15c88c5bab0d
81948 F20101123_AABARW manuel_k_Page_48.jpg
3d9b321cbfa36361207b44dda77fa5b2
238383a6dfc9ab35d6318e940fff6fc21802f9b3
6035 F20101123_AABASL manuel_k_Page_18thm.jpg
2cf75f206b07e4e96fca18403b59bddd
f90a5eed74e69776482f57e6b5fb06cf9ebf7121
22486 F20101123_AABATA manuel_k_Page_84.QC.jpg
97b3d65ae7d518dabd293347654271ae
f1012e230516eab43b4cc50f558b13c1775ba0f9
62406 F20101123_AABASM manuel_k_Page_06.pro
332c31224b43f8e74c792464d101f619
34dd6e5c3a17677725702ebf5bdd9481c7131a47
F20101123_AABARX manuel_k_Page_01.tif
c7385b3744afeb1586220b0f6661d1c3
dc643879319781722f0fd3fa7fdc6b0596ddfb4f
1051986 F20101123_AABATB manuel_k_Page_06.jp2
46d6443a86c4645ddb0af0ca4231a06a
9485e9d6106459373de755996c58e936240b1fbb
41335 F20101123_AABASN manuel_k_Page_93.jp2
38bdbc046b9309230b0e1820c100a563
dd1776062bafe2f64a47e560e64890189660e8b5
2085 F20101123_AABARY manuel_k_Page_75.txt
2b1e9c9d8cd0908399a51cae0d4154c1
b512928f81a4fe805e06b0be0c09ddbb683dfb87
4528 F20101123_AABATC manuel_k_Page_86.QC.jpg
3ddf13988baf7f790e758d98a070d6d7
46839ea7a0fefa7d64ac9af6067178eeb576bb9e
2042 F20101123_AABASO manuel_k_Page_29.txt
55e0b6eb68d182d66008ec1472bc1ced
c02323c7c3c6e20e2eda51418d974394ac7ed95b
968 F20101123_AABARZ manuel_k_Page_47.txt
bda69e54d50737154b376cc49dab6bb6
f6c73cbdcca23e5013c84dfb9dd5a5ff39de1d98
323021 F20101123_AABASP manuel_k_Page_08.jp2
f1b686c30fecff04cd3ee23e6f55b8fe
5374ba9ee4416a23b586ca58b131c8a840bfaacf
54811 F20101123_AABATD manuel_k_Page_44.pro
48b351e7d603c91e5aab8e93b1f1e300
1ed4adb23f7400f83b659d97245fc9b046ea4b3a
6512 F20101123_AABASQ manuel_k_Page_62thm.jpg
a7c50fd1655ac2eda5aa3a8ddb9190f2
b982ccaea525ccebc4ff0ffa1a2d91204b2e3a3f
F20101123_AABATE manuel_k_Page_76.tif
cc0963f9ec0a848ba6b5aae6b8da32b0
4a66a625ffced570c661785ec756cf2eabc86cbd
76704 F20101123_AABASR manuel_k_Page_91.jpg
9764ca6794d653dc12443528a2f922e5
475a8260d9a8f704602e93ce0a2e734f06875e94
117666 F20101123_AABATF manuel_k_Page_15.jp2
09b9d10fd6cd77b73b179ee8a5e939e8
7df610183c168d58b12be5cad196a5cf5b18117f
73684 F20101123_AABASS manuel_k_Page_51.jpg
1a8e82ceee07612ad34d7623ee19d9f1
f90f05a85fba211e45adee99251ed57eaaa543ff
50480 F20101123_AABATG manuel_k_Page_64.pro
6accf6eef882265f700a687a600cc478
68f0c7bf2f25b2718fff031720f05d11bc047930
72099 F20101123_AABAST manuel_k_Page_88.jpg
0903c695086cd943f1fbd2cbfef5c81d
64b02a03f5d5c687032eee93f477087499dfbe55
F20101123_AABATH manuel_k_Page_67.tif
2dfbeff47ba24d2f1e9e9a7521a5b667
218d9c751ab3e01649ea35895fd5a0766d5f7f37
48264 F20101123_AABASU manuel_k_Page_76.pro
4139d62f3a52353b156efef9d7dc6519
ff4d122419085852e020427297f3e00d31f67fa1
115555 F20101123_AABATI manuel_k_Page_77.jp2
e0492d9477f784334afabf37398241e9
ca8b8533c145c9f8f204fbf09ed2e14a435cdafd
78198 F20101123_AABASV manuel_k_Page_21.jpg
1c9048f30555b61c57b7c89976c863ea
8abb0b253de592aa2753ef45f88b341dc38de30d
19415 F20101123_AABATJ manuel_k_Page_81.QC.jpg
f022b738a5441d83c3c217bed2cd88e1
7dc895e81604eb00406307f464388aa5ad2dbbdb
6678 F20101123_AABASW manuel_k_Page_29thm.jpg
f64fec0a42628606996d7c7a12070ac7
52426a05fc51419cf6a91bdad5e867e0837d7182
22945 F20101123_AABATK manuel_k_Page_33.QC.jpg
aebebb7bc4ffe4982badab96ffc0de02
5ded9ba0b66d0a8bc132b8bdd6460da54ad245a3
F20101123_AABASX manuel_k_Page_62.tif
d2fd079c46ba799e84b11b32e33efbfc
a5b748b9c0c1cb90e1bf8edaacc3ec2fbfd26d13
31526 F20101123_AABATL manuel_k_Page_93.jpg
c2d647d6b8689a3624bf35331c799481
2e6bef8fe76c74b6677d089c561ce238dfd8db79
75120 F20101123_AABAUA manuel_k_Page_39.jp2
da459825f628ca92554dd35491efc2b6
b4edc9c051cec2246f7755020b7130558f06cc28
23879 F20101123_AABATM manuel_k_Page_60.QC.jpg
b9591c3eb584b45c809e00a7be9f913b
f8bf4e31efc881eb5a349ad2ffc3d76ef43b36d1
1724 F20101123_AABASY manuel_k_Page_92.txt
83882170366a4d63d2e3f65efa279c1b
76908ccfcbb8053ac9c7c60338e2c7bc94359f69
56309 F20101123_AABAUB manuel_k_Page_79.pro
fa7e89256a90b026058cedf592b74f2a
92b5e4689eb9e6ea538c0ac026035e78444b4d73
21702 F20101123_AABATN manuel_k_Page_25.QC.jpg
49700ffe0daf099142e3f88f1d7557d2
7a7f649fdfa94ce7eeba0435d15c56132701598a
2262 F20101123_AABASZ manuel_k_Page_01thm.jpg
0f3723cc19cd83a2234483c87738234c
6ddc81e5dcff11cbead088585702ac66c4788bf4
F20101123_AABAUC manuel_k_Page_53.tif
4fe4866374c000d87ce46958316c5b11
5c4fd824d7414e4aa491a165d578af00f6f91d40
F20101123_AABATO manuel_k_Page_17.txt
34ba5f0229f75c0bff4e85cda915f661
fceb6cc446dcbd737cbd52fe88ce66cf7bf4c39f
53881 F20101123_AABAUD manuel_k_Page_42.pro
df391237871d77479717855a68a56dc3
2529e350e0e48dc2682c48adce16bc528174f938
2470 F20101123_AABATP manuel_k_Page_20.txt
be4466bdc64cefef368134eedf852eae
eb09d0d907459044aa7e0ab58d57bd6486af66f8
41581 F20101123_AABAUE manuel_k_Page_92.pro
ba949f0caf14ac4d7d382a1bc251cd4a
59e4aa0dd4258d48c797b9c6984015d1197eb0d5
F20101123_AABATQ manuel_k_Page_52.tif
d231b0a77389d04a5216accb139d7451
01fb76db3a120e68f526b2c7a00e6f0ac5a70be1
10427 F20101123_AABBAA manuel_k_Page_68.jp2
64414239f2f98346dfc84eb01cb0a959
063d9d0b8a9517dff894d45816cdbf56d7712c8a
107955 F20101123_AABAUF manuel_k_Page_75.jp2
935908ee0fd7e2e5d51994fc36e9681c
3284ab06a9ee74d03355940430f78c3a387b67c0
F20101123_AABATR manuel_k_Page_68.tif
20861dc9715797bb3947d4228bef76be
7821c84ea7a7794baee918baf60be77da3039d77
6632 F20101123_AABAUG manuel_k_Page_30thm.jpg
10017e96d8e2dd3ac9e468eefe3af9a4
a16efff08cc67867f02e548df2b0c0f5378acd3f
20626 F20101123_AABATS manuel_k_Page_69.QC.jpg
1b2f07581f395487a681f0bad92e432a
e82f06d46a7706b9dcd149f189e1fcbeb5f7a557
121722 F20101123_AABBAB manuel_k_Page_70.jp2
19971699d09663582e482cd574d0bd7d
0037fe66abbc32f148700226e9ae65a6b659af66
6616 F20101123_AABAUH manuel_k_Page_60thm.jpg
97c6bf7da09fd29a5f02ccfba38e4b9c
affa7d38e3ce93d01599a00132c25db8c1f5edb2
94852 F20101123_AABATT manuel_k_Page_53.jp2
2901169d1a10aa0b9316a0cb37f77ee7
135fd75560deff15bea49dabe2076ece8c7a0fdc
123764 F20101123_AABBAC manuel_k_Page_71.jp2
0de0a669d4b6515eb588576a739179c0
f3b7d0dfe4acc8d22d37fbd1fd431a873dcbff25
63607 F20101123_AABAUI manuel_k_Page_20.pro
932433b06a9e29cf842fe1540c54c76d
174dc4e83dad69f4dc36df570ec32f2660ba5b8a
2079 F20101123_AABATU manuel_k_Page_27.txt
5792c5f97e432a5ea350c7ee734cf2fc
5a97006828b88372206b7a3c1f8a2f3028d78ca5
119249 F20101123_AABBAD manuel_k_Page_73.jp2
43aff690b22127c4bcddfd057690e356
ea6b3db4157c421f65f7d22cf478950e0a8e1abe
F20101123_AABAUJ manuel_k_Page_02.tif
a27325adf90010eb0ad388b899c2271a
2e88136bd7bb664cb97d67e5e84c810ecb0bcdd2
1518 F20101123_AABATV manuel_k_Page_49.txt
e8da9aaf78d52bfc711204338ef1d501
1f0a50fe9b0f8e697054a9505478e3c996d57838
101259 F20101123_AABBAE manuel_k_Page_74.jp2
8608614beb32c0ae23a1ae257e0bf0b5
0f0ae72a0107d8f719d5d733598978bd4e089e3a
158139 F20101123_AABAUK manuel_k_Page_05.jp2
8dc7f93f4d3a88f1e22d79458124215d
21d9f922165f0469351fb6876e2a62cfcd8e164c
1977 F20101123_AABATW manuel_k_Page_08thm.jpg
0c8559319e902729c4658b9b1c6ab34c
0f48e2bdbcd2cdda6002089eacacbece93a89f1c
6073 F20101123_AABAUL manuel_k_Page_59thm.jpg
fe87d77c523c1dc2cdb38ee91221fe23
e6e29552fdd8e94abb825b5f677aace6bdbabdd8
103909 F20101123_AABATX manuel_k_Page_84.jp2
c1a473fcc490e2fcd4fb5df60fd7cdc8
d9688bb8ed5d01e845691941e150577d81a68753
103980 F20101123_AABBAF manuel_k_Page_76.jp2
2e10af60ca3104756a557a01c59c04de
f0f54de29c1b2ba5edf9adab6bf13353b1d520ff
6505 F20101123_AABAVA manuel_k_Page_33thm.jpg
1a6b40fe6fb926c24c846da20cf77810
204e41d70b44c04fee44f5eef2dd53c3e7fc4f8e
75795 F20101123_AABAUM manuel_k_Page_77.jpg
4a8888ad3361a35479bfb5a53620ed4d
1cf7582264ce9cbe30be0d8f9e7867fd86a5505e
F20101123_AABATY manuel_k_Page_27.tif
e62fdf3976f92c5e585edb95cdb5a1bc
4181d899429d088d717b59f4f01fe135a3d3c91f
106696 F20101123_AABBAG manuel_k_Page_78.jp2
0639c2b7b8c1c262c60b20ea1db06b20
f907dcc09d9060e903f13b4a285b34740c20a84e
F20101123_AABAVB manuel_k_Page_91.tif
f279fa09ae3b50d2a50762343b650bd6
e39d34040c860247b702a422c99746fbca07c818
76662 F20101123_AABAUN manuel_k_Page_57.jpg
1559e27a3f414b89b42cecacfc142df7
1e99f7a737e1400818d585341574a0e443c6a12a
113283 F20101123_AABBAH manuel_k_Page_79.jp2
d6ef7c5d809c8ad4026aec344d01e65b
5206049b37fa049ff6fe281dad558594a37f2566
23374 F20101123_AABAVC manuel_k_Page_12.QC.jpg
915d00296d845c2b1d01d32ca2871362
462a52bfb23a898f063cfbeeaa1f7f7ac61a0ba8
53714 F20101123_AABAUO manuel_k_Page_36.pro
67c1143de9f0ece4ccd61280a839bbda
a9c9597cfce6021f88d8a1b05f445df814725545
118057 F20101123_AABATZ manuel_k_Page_23.jp2
6963f6d12b9b5e228b198068a5efd421
435d4cd88f8ad9602c731417ce88b6ae1903f04d
100860 F20101123_AABBAI manuel_k_Page_80.jp2
32bebc5162cfe3a36e743f206325801e
98413e91ab73068b009a24b576a9e9dd79e05a45
98789 F20101123_AABAVD manuel_k_Page_50.jp2
b9e18a72aadb2c7bce077d695580a0a5
75f673da2e04678d89df8927a05abb71090b8d6b
109241 F20101123_AABAUP manuel_k_Page_46.jp2
b03f85ea38383e09669c480948b2b6cc
f8151b1fa37a8f3774585b4f2bb9c403dfa3e6e6
98052 F20101123_AABBAJ manuel_k_Page_81.jp2
c9fcc9b36eaefac2260c4abd2f0534fa
fea38a4db672390a1f57689bb4e3416c5f485e6b
1931 F20101123_AABAVE manuel_k_Page_25.txt
676cc76156086d11d3e5925fa91f95e3
1523bae77f0481aeec93f5412108e98c5d862f79
66676 F20101123_AABAUQ manuel_k_Page_56.jp2
7b61b0971e76bee1d8b7bd5f9f07847c
99d3d6c38f9bba98ab742a3ff3dfc11182c4e55f
111478 F20101123_AABBAK manuel_k_Page_82.jp2
8c7adacb18501f5764f0933ac7b8f3a0
0a56b45de7ad08a767647d8e6d1fec862b078bc9
6558 F20101123_AABAVF manuel_k_Page_31thm.jpg
629c7af220d3750e77eb1e6566aa3edb
57aa4118325fbdeed45eceeb18367ec2ecad727d
1772 F20101123_AABAUR manuel_k_Page_87.txt
cc1fb39eb161d4a2430b4c08a3371bfb
65b8fe6d7f9e511af6d1e53c271202954d2e704a
F20101123_AABBBA manuel_k_Page_15.tif
da840f90c90eb2d44193c9701aff8e7d
3643f8d5b3a0a2c001d2c4bec66de142e9b8a6e1
100689 F20101123_AABBAL manuel_k_Page_85.jp2
774cc8c787ebd1670e83f61d89438476
161c7298073e0f5ac3a017199a768584adeab309
F20101123_AABAVG manuel_k_Page_18.tif
6bb929f3de056a50eb8cd3b1184df873
afc362fcf902dbe2ec01dc47872c97dc43135620
2222 F20101123_AABAUS manuel_k_Page_37.txt
8cdf093e3977202189b97921f91637ee
6903290f0a6fd32afc874d149d8bbefc987c9bf5
F20101123_AABBBB manuel_k_Page_16.tif
7b4ea87431ef4f266c14cf81eaf9550b
e7bab02325fd417503863f7e921acca023f72789
11606 F20101123_AABBAM manuel_k_Page_86.jp2
3571c417768f174453a86c349460d7e8
aef08eb039fbab585af02d92c6e34bb6ee4cfd5b
139925 F20101123_AABAVH UFE0011650_00001.xml
6890564cf8ee87744fefb03af6ba92f5
65434e852348432287d1ae0309484b650c3b015e
F20101123_AABAUT manuel_k_Page_08.tif
2c97656f7c7d99512e24bb5498ef8174
907137b9bc6785506d323257d1131eb2e5394918
F20101123_AABBBC manuel_k_Page_17.tif
e10500361b57d5e74a75d31be00a9c5e
0dfe8c8e0b102d86ef26f0e576e78de700bca8c9
93712 F20101123_AABBAN manuel_k_Page_87.jp2
0529cdb032f94a9c905ad9b5a9d3c5df
b57c8d418a93c2c4138aa9787785cfc999a428cf
F20101123_AABAUU manuel_k_Page_74.tif
27305943ca3505bb7af14c8c82d3e2ef
a3267e702515f55ba168c2a7a37cd70f8ae21d9d
F20101123_AABBBD manuel_k_Page_19.tif
b7192bc63d3dbab143ee250e9b0558e5
a49f8d2c3b826c53dcc0e07f72ccad01da800139
108049 F20101123_AABBAO manuel_k_Page_88.jp2
effa2c8d1bb2374ba516a74dbb2a213a
1cb2ed6655886abce719539187634cc6f4295ec7
69309 F20101123_AABAUV manuel_k_Page_58.jpg
4a4e5dd95c0cd346ef19a0e7a3c28d1f
1caf45bc692e81b19aa9a98eabe508cda3a5525b
F20101123_AABBBE manuel_k_Page_20.tif
ebf07785ef63ce1f2691ffdcb0992adf
d11eadcb85e8d9cbc6e7958ad96ecab29b7236b1
46062 F20101123_AABBAP manuel_k_Page_89.jp2
2453be9814df8fedd2ed1b02dbbf315d
6a4e2cae917752c6beeb0aaac79398f54bac3db6
F20101123_AABAVK manuel_k_Page_01.jpg
896d03cfbb092dcc48079c6a5c8cd8c4
05fbe7612e15b77b00ed99d3f48bf23527e993a9
2856 F20101123_AABAUW manuel_k_Page_48.txt
27b63216c8563fdee8038f1a5750d5d3
5540bf22284c489fc5c99d42f5e9e953e90395d1
F20101123_AABBBF manuel_k_Page_23.tif
e56fdb3711c5431a09f9e1b1ae344e96
0af1bba9d09c81b3d367fb51daa1fe63fa3c9c99
91273 F20101123_AABBAQ manuel_k_Page_90.jp2
eaba2df77df0a218e87b2eaa5580fed8
04c5ae59b5e78b1c41a2a77139bde94c21deb455
10334 F20101123_AABAVL manuel_k_Page_02.jpg
a3a6fd8b52eebc5e74631ffeddf7c85c
230aa6cdf949eed1eb4d33bbffa3cfbf16d16a13
F20101123_AABAUX manuel_k_Page_10.tif
949f556bf4b90ec7c25c215dcfb88411
9d535f87534c038f8f4dd38fc6c9c38a13e02c00
119360 F20101123_AABBAR manuel_k_Page_91.jp2
1efd9f6af1ac7119ed9ab6b73cc778e5
9f7004349dfb20a0bebbe699fedbe67fd4276b56
47960 F20101123_AABAVM manuel_k_Page_03.jpg
23c0d2b081cfc63dacd3e0626d7a0505
858ef95f4cc4b12bd7bc81db7da9c47e69e4eb31
77294 F20101123_AABAUY manuel_k_Page_23.jpg
cfad0c9d0b09e56dcb86ad21a07eb337
da05c90ea988013214ded54c6b761f6b3115d067
F20101123_AABBBG manuel_k_Page_24.tif
e12e5e939caec9fc8b3fb01d79d32c29
ab58057b380c6692a14c87ca99cdb5a414b1f8d1
56523 F20101123_AABAWA manuel_k_Page_17.jpg
f92567dda765ba8d1fdc27fd3b6d8bc0
9552526ed1ccc11a94dce8c30612a2da17247862
93317 F20101123_AABBAS manuel_k_Page_92.jp2
bf2c172ccc309ee5da888a79be7a5972
d6eb43e5ee148a1fc0007befcb0c1022418f6f90
59517 F20101123_AABAVN manuel_k_Page_04.jpg
bfab043afd40f13eaba01fa6ae125450
68559224857e97a4fe8e9f6561ef92e94e803b48
51702 F20101123_AABAUZ manuel_k_Page_81.pro
3f6dacec52c872a048ebd75408eadb58
787914cc230a9b4c8316438e73613c9ccffb02bd
F20101123_AABBBH manuel_k_Page_28.tif
cb4ad86d4d4e969756749282cbf30a5a
b99176c0463a380eb6dcb48daba787934399e83c
71530 F20101123_AABAWB manuel_k_Page_18.jpg
be41c3fa07ebcc6eb657c0914706661c
be6f410792152ce48bf96ad20e15493c5d42b4dd
F20101123_AABBAT manuel_k_Page_03.tif
7dffacfe01b818e8b70e13421106d1c1
e6f44d81bd823cd11903f22f5f4b8ea68316d534
13028 F20101123_AABAVO manuel_k_Page_05.jpg
61809c4ddc0e73941a0918de1630a211
c607b763b8f0bee089631ceafd8da770a61c8027
F20101123_AABBBI manuel_k_Page_29.tif
d305564d1b89adf60c6af05bc8faa443
144e2f72da743347020d381f83d36af70f53149f
74099 F20101123_AABAWC manuel_k_Page_19.jpg
5ed6891a54d3efac0dc8588d42365c12
157609f7bf493324cbbc15906b890afd7481e2b2
F20101123_AABBAU manuel_k_Page_04.tif
691188c44b83fc40ea838839996d41ae
b96a1d084596c3889cdf2150827f02697dc93aef
78833 F20101123_AABAVP manuel_k_Page_06.jpg
bb0de791138a3f427b31bd5a43ca460d
38763ebd543cbc483c4ad650a0b944caa1c481d2
F20101123_AABBBJ manuel_k_Page_30.tif
199745467d49430a91a7caf5ac503349
dd48a13b75f01a422be95c0c271d176889cbaf37
80332 F20101123_AABAWD manuel_k_Page_20.jpg
0d7d7d0a45c30d6b61e9835f9318de64
734f9a3055f7794436b72a7a0559a5f6882e34b2
F20101123_AABBAV manuel_k_Page_05.tif
37c4f4032b738b5148ed0a2a92716942
8c47a6aa9b13ee05802380ed881b72b48552550a
23862 F20101123_AABAVQ manuel_k_Page_07.jpg
c5b8fc555fb3c51eae3a2e2ce53c2f36
9e19510d77c3ebf514e31ba1b18bbeeb6173f28b
F20101123_AABBBK manuel_k_Page_31.tif
af244eb99bf465bd4b5a55a18576ab08
94b83a5eff2ad9f7e7498f4818276f10823a11d7
77380 F20101123_AABAWE manuel_k_Page_22.jpg
0fb5306d0f3898162b813760dccc141c
4f1f5709a5638d242ff55988910a9ab126e0af96
F20101123_AABBAW manuel_k_Page_06.tif
ac744b84dfb04d87ea6378991636113a
1e2f727cac5c1a3c8d2255c72d395dcc12e4100b
18314 F20101123_AABAVR manuel_k_Page_08.jpg
77a2c1fbc7d6912d132c2b1ddd035dc4
31feecaabe6b23b0e59f2f9d2b3da19cde9b804f
F20101123_AABBCA manuel_k_Page_48.tif
0fdeed953065e26c66d95555c0e419f1
ef917f5714b54d45b6d9690acea057be363b61c4
F20101123_AABBBL manuel_k_Page_33.tif
fb0bd002ed75d565e1f8020e14314e26
48e45e69d200d2db81edc90287629c7ae21e3ec3
67456 F20101123_AABAWF manuel_k_Page_25.jpg
967d53c99b64a2733a287075f5f698c9
3815d6748ed8fb79508b3c33465d8710d1abb914
F20101123_AABBAX manuel_k_Page_09.tif
857d2b677d275899b8eb6b1c2e1298c9
dc40cd216e584db97f0dfd0302f2d5e90f19ae61
57508 F20101123_AABAVS manuel_k_Page_09.jpg
b7a08f83408ab2640d6b552514f7b72d
8ce4e7baadb95af5d70249a077dc41931d7abd86
F20101123_AABBCB manuel_k_Page_50.tif
0999d6e38773d859446b2e32f98e9b0c
68c4c4bfd92893388a99530f74d719e47766f93f
F20101123_AABBBM manuel_k_Page_34.tif
8672569e71b9c60b8256e86551532604
f515c0d640dba07c7b6bbb2e9d4cd026eaee2e72
73070 F20101123_AABAWG manuel_k_Page_26.jpg
7ce96d380ee8a7afb75a871a642d30c3
30257d54b56d9d428b87714038573b1a5f2f7115
F20101123_AABBAY manuel_k_Page_11.tif
d8d30afb04c830da24112f5c3ce83b7f
c2e6c85a888f37432c580f72906216449d90298e
35615 F20101123_AABAVT manuel_k_Page_10.jpg
a5ac44861dcf59ce1443521e3765de33
67437d2250368f5d132441b0f635809decfb9a30
F20101123_AABBCC manuel_k_Page_54.tif
e93dbc5e25960e7ffb69a4bc39619344
e95935901ae554f2dbfae7c5fd96a19418c6f3f0
F20101123_AABBBN manuel_k_Page_35.tif
1608fa18fcd664f4a860f1080db2a653
54d70abf8cd488037619fa9d4d1d16a8f870f418
72897 F20101123_AABAWH manuel_k_Page_27.jpg
163b3dfa39abbf6aa9f38edf8b00fdcf
c987b651d960e21de0f351bb377f3a8022b14010
F20101123_AABBAZ manuel_k_Page_13.tif
745aa3f042d51608b7a2fad916804d41
41317fae2f709cf3a51ad742468d823afe0aea79
63549 F20101123_AABAVU manuel_k_Page_11.jpg
acc77a640433efaf5bdb49d746c4889f
bd3860c0121837025028743c1b58bfac2c90b6f7
F20101123_AABBCD manuel_k_Page_56.tif
49d0e0cf59cf2ce4e9d670407666905f
0b43632310b11437f81fc728f46c672f6a3556b0
F20101123_AABBBO manuel_k_Page_36.tif
95fef1c489874464597aefe09e203078
23285527547755c643fcd450c051be8b790899d5
72504 F20101123_AABAWI manuel_k_Page_28.jpg
6df026b14d42e05dcc29e654b10c1e5e
fdcd1e46bca850c7fa83373434caacc21a3059ce
71484 F20101123_AABAVV manuel_k_Page_12.jpg
dfb73f29693acb3ab7bac296a3ad884e
d952afdc44025dde25ca28e1c26c9a330dacdee1
F20101123_AABBCE manuel_k_Page_57.tif
1b77cfdc312bcda9f5a7c6b0311c016f
83b13bc6573bc408a347830885c6159bd43f4be8
F20101123_AABBBP manuel_k_Page_37.tif
5836196aafe739912e105d1f3270dd50
7b63ebc1084b9b242af5bc963dafae2667c77624
72977 F20101123_AABAWJ manuel_k_Page_29.jpg
a7f27443332d2658bcc959681a8ecff2
1d3c7642e0a430c3f892ad696290c3348468b45c
72979 F20101123_AABAVW manuel_k_Page_13.jpg
c9689926926833af32acf37ca55f0a75
c17bc12c1331f01a41b7e9cd3f935af34ab38b1c
F20101123_AABBCF manuel_k_Page_58.tif
054dcd514dfdb497a96bf828006d0009
4fb618219454cfc1d5a4fa9d34652e94d343d3b5
F20101123_AABBBQ manuel_k_Page_38.tif
c97134a9dc50a2d1fba1b3fcce930937
1c006201fbd883730639f2f4d5544a0094b5487f
77199 F20101123_AABAWK manuel_k_Page_30.jpg
7a3c3359206491b79ad9553c0a65ef6b
8332466618f6c449c8f0602c9ac539e01efbdb8b
80549 F20101123_AABAVX manuel_k_Page_14.jpg
14271e35a89132a3510fd632bda5aa4c
49df576c964b4fa23d0510f4c9450e09a2fbf624
F20101123_AABBCG manuel_k_Page_59.tif
b9abb18d4163043cd3a31d035f7a6d18
ee80e120ce0a0299cb59203f50cf08a2a827e691
F20101123_AABBBR manuel_k_Page_39.tif
0b67745c65bc56b0aecf53c3980e114f
d64a703db02665c0f91ad0071cdf1304a472cc9a
76288 F20101123_AABAWL manuel_k_Page_31.jpg
b081050052b2a8b409d0ffe4637b7a65
5780bd3c0453d9a34ab17e23077f60c4bf8393b8
76560 F20101123_AABAVY manuel_k_Page_15.jpg
8bc34979afa2f937bbcb9b79eb2af18c
43901a3b5a3e7e3458ccabcc978c27be0924f6ef
63569 F20101123_AABAXA manuel_k_Page_53.jpg
ac9f9cfa29e5f97fc38080106ccb73fb
fff47e46ba218289c45549e4802a17ad20e8d7f1
F20101123_AABBBS manuel_k_Page_40.tif
756db604c0c6b8f7bc514af4e7d70061
33569b51b951be06b329b6dbb76a2f2876bbd90c
67797 F20101123_AABAWM manuel_k_Page_33.jpg
ba60c75a964c9fbff779fd3e816fac7d
9c285437a95cdae3131f14cc5698ae102ab51835
73398 F20101123_AABAVZ manuel_k_Page_16.jpg
da2385145f7d5970092bce10a961ad64
a91ff28df1d9a50a7fe175ebbb0902d8ffc6eabb
F20101123_AABBCH manuel_k_Page_60.tif
0d4aa74490d94dab0f583383809d55ce
dff43ab2db2d6a10578e24723294ca868cca6050
64896 F20101123_AABAXB manuel_k_Page_54.jpg
29aaf25c93573dc191345ddcd11b0441
cc4f1a433d6897b6c98e8d03a91eda55fa3b1e64
F20101123_AABBBT manuel_k_Page_41.tif
a921fdf55fde6afc6a80951b29b0cb2f
469c0938d98df7d83c8b89baea451d85af5b3c59
70220 F20101123_AABAWN manuel_k_Page_34.jpg
d180b9f145b1504cacd88bb307dca0be
65e01ae103b6a62a4d2f258e46f2491de801d1c1
F20101123_AABBCI manuel_k_Page_61.tif
df4ccf764a4fa5aeaecb1b82cb92d538
507b0b17e2d7a2f9f35dea0e3806f02a95b73602
70522 F20101123_AABAXC manuel_k_Page_55.jpg
c5c2d71086660046342e1d309e253404
e65cc0592c4972309b2fbbb9056375d588a44446
F20101123_AABBBU manuel_k_Page_42.tif
a533ebe66235be4edbba851ce6681ead
2c703891298da64ed22b37a6a15893a93f5ac03f
67049 F20101123_AABAWO manuel_k_Page_35.jpg
5eab8dcb004cc2a3e56274db5819a8d6
3412f91108cda9e81417939240f534092d0ff1ed
F20101123_AABBCJ manuel_k_Page_64.tif
0a48b1fcb9401acf1fcac52c7bc1497c
103508b0e674ef1cf8ceebfb7e7b5c2841c206a0
45320 F20101123_AABAXD manuel_k_Page_56.jpg
f0f1eb125b8186fc890493eb248b09c6
db810e2b878d82432467f3d7b398b0ea1acfbfb6
F20101123_AABBBV manuel_k_Page_43.tif
e212e3e1e5dc0351c0a60fe62761ed34
e54d09e269b5b3a531322c51ad922117c2fac4a0
69561 F20101123_AABAWP manuel_k_Page_36.jpg
e6d3f181debb7f4e4830aefc875edff4
b8a3230a056cb2c7880109659cc751408e36ae11
F20101123_AABBCK manuel_k_Page_65.tif
19ca54464d51d5e134d191cee29307c0
202928bc40ecea68a2f25dc7bc1c4df27bb35f0d
69326 F20101123_AABAXE manuel_k_Page_59.jpg
a1a0ef39d4679e1025e2b1912d4f6d4a
8ed164fd940f406247c1f9f779dcfd4c1d015656
F20101123_AABBBW manuel_k_Page_44.tif
4d7496752f9f6160c34758bf25dcc983
cdb515884ed0b687de90257de3b3076b845edaef
49878 F20101123_AABAWQ manuel_k_Page_39.jpg
3c8703faa6dd4e2080b2a801a90a34cd
621a3e91921df1458fd828b4d44a2f7345713853
F20101123_AABBCL manuel_k_Page_66.tif
462bee80e2e9e7086236b3ddfb25a500
b9a7d06be0d460d9a3ff272c221f7a8cc1bf0035
82111 F20101123_AABAXF manuel_k_Page_61.jpg
68d9b8dbe16b05b5f7fd66aa7cc76a9d
dc14e6422747ad498b7a6f0621deda5540b5e0fe
F20101123_AABBBX manuel_k_Page_45.tif
7f73f0fd43950d021f1dc5632fc128fa
e1d6bdf453acd2adf56c12e65ca197395ca0d6cc
86413 F20101123_AABAWR manuel_k_Page_40.jpg
d0e9706085ce34048ec499c6a0e054c0
1839208d0b54e02138f247162b77b882025cfafd
F20101123_AABBDA manuel_k_Page_89.tif
075d0478937f43119e38e890f01746cc
40ac7b3e6d3a0aa9d7f1b9362bbf75c4d7323fe0
F20101123_AABBCM manuel_k_Page_69.tif
6cd7c388902e21e488207e9fa01f0745
88b5f9359d0aa362bd4cfd3b407322baa3440e0e
72653 F20101123_AABAXG manuel_k_Page_62.jpg
66f7e646b298462b7f3aa7e66f498269
698cb5160169512b8e2bf70bb558aebdf24e4189
F20101123_AABBBY manuel_k_Page_46.tif
cc88e624cab2761d777a33c63838f487
d8259913a88c68a54abe5f50063901a19206ef3b
71406 F20101123_AABAWS manuel_k_Page_42.jpg
5844c2c0fb7a47a7f68cd7f1fa23645e
4ffb4497fc6b037bdfaab0155b16425e27a5f1ed
F20101123_AABBDB manuel_k_Page_90.tif
4a53c09201d29490e2738ebce70396be
a2937e44bef12c94e6df79b22f7de2605c4b36cd
F20101123_AABBCN manuel_k_Page_70.tif
f1ee85c8330a0ee24ef4efdaaffae2ae
218bba4fa65d08c6c02f8d608349fc9c94998c7d
68907 F20101123_AABAXH manuel_k_Page_63.jpg
5d571da03700d05551efa7c31ecdb131
c5ec154922bdbb88c31856c28a86063e071b2814
F20101123_AABBBZ manuel_k_Page_47.tif
cf429373e99922ad498d28ca1b9a3e3e
f6c0f8fc5e3dad6646130c988a1f7b9ceb1f2e41
70866 F20101123_AABAWT manuel_k_Page_43.jpg
a4d90e543be46fcbb34095a9b68c5f69
835d419b129c95ebf0b24e102778affca3c680d9
F20101123_AABBDC manuel_k_Page_92.tif
7a005940771431298e5f80075e62a5cd
75e9c51e7921155b9726c1aba1e5a2be480fdcf6
F20101123_AABBCO manuel_k_Page_71.tif
fbf55c1f7658b29c90be78afb09433eb
5aeb3b4c9040bae03fb9a51a58dd106ba1a3f219
72098 F20101123_AABAXI manuel_k_Page_64.jpg
20c334d0e8200eb405f31c5d20238aa0
589a136d24aff5105e6f60a1a541a0daf84f831e
73761 F20101123_AABAWU manuel_k_Page_44.jpg
fc4421e3c9a49ca4454f72b08b331728
ec09dfdf5ef38af9a5d0c2824c418c3670ddd436
8292 F20101123_AABBDD manuel_k_Page_01.pro
20334c8d821596278b28ec9ff75bb3ca
7dc34e90e9047f222efe46d71a2c11d8ede08d46
F20101123_AABBCP manuel_k_Page_72.tif
506e8a38017962c2036c679f02b7cc80
ddacac862cb03b0a5d3acf17022039c85a4a311d
71113 F20101123_AABAXJ manuel_k_Page_65.jpg
e3e588b2e8efdb82957bfa631a5964ec
a477f41b44002c2f6736c0f4af3e92d464605ab9
75626 F20101123_AABAWV manuel_k_Page_45.jpg
b7516acb360a44abb94824ccbaea002e
2429466c6d17c0a03d54a06c36432e596553357d
1303 F20101123_AABBDE manuel_k_Page_02.pro
cb4065b52fcd0909a5a62e831d313aba
68ff7eee7281b7139d3e98c3722ecf688ab8b87e
F20101123_AABBCQ manuel_k_Page_75.tif
63da00bae6e0484c00f032d9e09eb2e7
caef6b0bc4d60affb67198b80d9e47933300cec7
61906 F20101123_AABAXK manuel_k_Page_66.jpg
f4f2e4895e5f40045183cf5bcdbed76c
22991bd25332c915ff9ed944e4b1eb25c3cd1ab1
71767 F20101123_AABAWW manuel_k_Page_46.jpg
b441995ab7ec16924c5b1656983114ee
710ba69e697a62619de381e390d25cec77405038
30734 F20101123_AABBDF manuel_k_Page_03.pro
7d9757c3af28d6e50025f73abb52d040
2fa339742453cac24e37944821ce2e23aac15405
F20101123_AABBCR manuel_k_Page_78.tif
89e87ec6cea2eb08d7675a52f3ee91fc
abb80f83ed7f03b6339be59fbdcc618e9ad35e03
69850 F20101123_AABAXL manuel_k_Page_67.jpg
a58aa453197e079b6fed88b17c665bf9
8262232c873e12f0b62fd32b728a44fcf7c4f8ce
56985 F20101123_AABAWX manuel_k_Page_49.jpg
c52e17f9bc545cdb51dd2c47936e3d92
e31c2d97387a32cfa9b75ae777cba1e5799cc2aa
62255 F20101123_AABBDG manuel_k_Page_04.pro
21a09aa441615b320f9da9e3675371ed
bc44fea457e21a7913aa64625c757bf9418047b9
F20101123_AABBCS manuel_k_Page_79.tif
4a2e3c06bfffde0b693b6305c8142d40
15c017cc0922007d1a927b85f691227bd5d1b2f5
12408 F20101123_AABAXM manuel_k_Page_68.jpg
fc76fbc1c2692de0f712b89f89da7194
732901c97746285cd98b924e22bd0367e5fc2228
70671 F20101123_AABAWY manuel_k_Page_50.jpg
42465f908472eea18cff27fd805ff489
8c0e49c347334da1c55d5611efdd893cc87432e1
6966 F20101123_AABBDH manuel_k_Page_05.pro
2b0443ca4b048fa16b6b3d65a193c6f1
964f5c5fc9a4559f3bbbdd0e6bc40aec96d5c0b9
62894 F20101123_AABAYA manuel_k_Page_87.jpg
60e8b95b4742c0b522162e3ddfe20f8a
ee3d7f11917255f27e43f37c34ea72d8953737a1
F20101123_AABBCT manuel_k_Page_81.tif
57c21d6e7034205d6630cd16bef46446
bb4b0bb6a829a42f9b0e75ba99b1d2ad2ef565ab
79199 F20101123_AABAXN manuel_k_Page_70.jpg
707a2a81160358ed0439ec944d7bb406
45cbcf45afd27027b56f7e79dab3a2bda3c6638a
62972 F20101123_AABAWZ manuel_k_Page_52.jpg
ae2d4e495b758d3dc6c2c7ce4872d9c5
10dfaf7094eb9abb3c3d726a584f1171eb1c3516
33728 F20101123_AABAYB manuel_k_Page_89.jpg
2ba06b6e77a01934b0102dc819200174
503db5b87ff6d712ca08780e4721cfc2685fde1c
F20101123_AABBCU manuel_k_Page_82.tif
facde5e320c6b57b96ff30eb2895fdf6
8056c9c674015909e0b1aecf11a731b92d741132
78899 F20101123_AABAXO manuel_k_Page_71.jpg
5d05fad3f0112193e14f8174e71e75a8
d0896dff2c7668ec6a9c7525d34ea155a06022db
13131 F20101123_AABBDI manuel_k_Page_07.pro
35f4dd30d4e7ff38e00a9866ab90f9df
d84ab272a5c22acf111b838574faa2ea07a256a0
64552 F20101123_AABAYC manuel_k_Page_92.jpg
8e560b968739ecbd28c3fcc86f820de7
37c97efdb33f7f05a5c72b12ba065bb77de52ddd
F20101123_AABBCV manuel_k_Page_84.tif
52ade5adc85213f37c0a7314c221675e
b44ca5bebe4d0c645074e4ec51cf1a991a933334
74553 F20101123_AABAXP manuel_k_Page_72.jpg
0413b2300854d4e65c71eec407d74e3c
1ceb063e2cf3cbd3e5939ccc526a3a32b850e8d1
37491 F20101123_AABBDJ manuel_k_Page_09.pro
0c1913ad5f100b9136c3cf41a8c7fb56
bc55501457066501ee7c420149b9b2c2f55d32dc
23701 F20101123_AABAYD manuel_k_Page_01.jp2
6640782074b0d4c5a5f0d24f7e193e9b
7f65a317147600df00e3d34726e986e2fd748cb1
F20101123_AABBCW manuel_k_Page_85.tif
0708d895b03d1bb24a7acd6f8b829d66
0b26cc7dbf445164c972e79b26d8471da9120659
75923 F20101123_AABAXQ manuel_k_Page_73.jpg
750a743cefd2447969b56d0911aeeffc
077f98d7e02a0d1703a773db248fd18f3fa70df2
21819 F20101123_AABBDK manuel_k_Page_10.pro
e5ea5bdf9bcc3f877a57024cb340e9bf
f3a6cdc01731149754afda725c59e1a6f1d3aaf2
6068 F20101123_AABAYE manuel_k_Page_02.jp2
f80a237a545956be1fbaa75e409b323e
3a6d200a1d407400f41a2c4a5e4b89abc1cae9c2
F20101123_AABBCX manuel_k_Page_86.tif
307f87012928474a8e00bae43ee7622d
ebd8878eee891df72d65785864a838c5302f6907
66141 F20101123_AABAXR manuel_k_Page_74.jpg
debc0b9d104b14a348f7839eefb2928d
fa0262452fda65f71377e4427692d7e064b7e813
51973 F20101123_AABBEA manuel_k_Page_29.pro
14ba261fc1694fb3ee1a1410b4bc99f6
30f8b48c87f3146bc274f52b47a6bdba0c107ef1
42887 F20101123_AABBDL manuel_k_Page_11.pro
d23fa1f9ee8e0d595143b98bf033165a
0669f59606b81cad70ea5da5360ff61e1505e401
1051981 F20101123_AABAYF manuel_k_Page_04.jp2
5505832586777cdf0b07cdc54eb4fb2e
6901b94af8608fdd156c119df762cbd2bc43cbda
F20101123_AABBCY manuel_k_Page_87.tif
73bfde31ceaf651f9ede2de35646f4d9
f6d63d3b46ea7f59aadb907bc66c9e0bbf1d6682
71986 F20101123_AABAXS manuel_k_Page_75.jpg
c8b777fc578a1f09dfeb5cb56ac90fa3
0d172e2360d85fffde4b4ae17222af5a13223d67
61933 F20101123_AABBEB manuel_k_Page_30.pro
cf5569af9551a966247180aa3f67f704
726406af661ba18a2cfe43ea1e28f0cdb495df1b
50895 F20101123_AABBDM manuel_k_Page_12.pro
6b0c5f34c8515463b99bbea7bf61b008
14d0a231aef553fe97f1f24b50212cf6f5269f7a
476799 F20101123_AABAYG manuel_k_Page_07.jp2
c87fe7980c6386f4a4c7942c5c863038
e40ee8825d7ca55e9bd9308faa1bbc7913645c1a
69789 F20101123_AABAXT manuel_k_Page_76.jpg
616d80dbecc29ae8ee375bd9424e43e6
b7437644368463a135a3ed8d9fab9a2761ea580b
59257 F20101123_AABBEC manuel_k_Page_31.pro
b325ec1912fa3d59e3a2458f6fee2452
df89601747abd11848a5aed1c1ba7605e9022317
51806 F20101123_AABBDN manuel_k_Page_13.pro
832c4272b0c6b6840ab8947731d6cba7
bd8213dc73ebe6fce164067d6e76fbfd092f94ad
49429 F20101123_AABAYH manuel_k_Page_10.jp2
9b10540806aaf0ce03695778be3b90a9
f8ba9f6cee50d20ca601367917428bf4b5d67534
F20101123_AABBCZ manuel_k_Page_88.tif
78d587d23967266c74c24d4100de8c2c
41b3b1557ceb8f92700aa157a008736174e16385
69714 F20101123_AABAXU manuel_k_Page_78.jpg
fba6abb48232d231d5b40b51b94996f9
8019018dd70d2c4c838039cde53453c88dac9f80
65721 F20101123_AABBED manuel_k_Page_32.pro
288f87e2abc39177b2a814caad911029
d33c589bcefb32b466896f82e677661f6c284108
64144 F20101123_AABBDO manuel_k_Page_14.pro
cb57b09a5e91e5588d776bb090688516
ed11fd3749501c4a7dbf33a5c0416b6d70634151
93395 F20101123_AABAYI manuel_k_Page_11.jp2
a699a424ecaa710db543db31a33616c7
d70d6f1aee1bbd0e3e224a7afad7accb8bbfc3cd
73211 F20101123_AABAXV manuel_k_Page_79.jpg
93023cd4bc478924ebec912129a951ee
166f0030671fc1df5769145c12fa94b302091086
50443 F20101123_AABBEE manuel_k_Page_34.pro
282ee5ac39c7f37f24119c5062ce9503
aa4c16a3d195d760af2efb39a2f21cfce71dcf32
52024 F20101123_AABBDP manuel_k_Page_16.pro
be4cf5d8b6a9fbb8cf4d9216b6a965c5
fd834f1c8171c537ce0ce8ee3fbaf7e005801d8a
108188 F20101123_AABAYJ manuel_k_Page_12.jp2
6c24a5886a1eaf3af784eddbe090a395
94c1958ce2359fadd6c5f29cc5ce876de466359e
63796 F20101123_AABAXW manuel_k_Page_81.jpg
8aa78ac33339b6b5083a09680920238e
224c8e05a93dd957d1470520258ea3370dfd1e57
52303 F20101123_AABBEF manuel_k_Page_35.pro
4a1fb5a6cc3b613dd2bd6c8514d8633b
163ed9626c1110f97031a873dc6572ecd07b0509
55077 F20101123_AABBDQ manuel_k_Page_18.pro
1b8b3ded6edf85965010f2d9163741db
9a818573cd7b4bd215c38949f49b65519470b185
111397 F20101123_AABAYK manuel_k_Page_13.jp2
ae14bd0364328f33bffe08e7bed06b42
d65657120d83b673f2b8c6251b3b4e41e51bb9d2
66820 F20101123_AABAXX manuel_k_Page_83.jpg
9dd319b286ca5f6a638f15f1258cb023
6d5ab390c8713c31ad57a726ae55c31235f00547
56980 F20101123_AABBEG manuel_k_Page_37.pro
60ba6a6aa2773bedef0cdb2337feb8bc
dcf63992594a9d2ab0c54a46efddccfd1bb0b1ee
63181 F20101123_AABBDR manuel_k_Page_19.pro
b062f71a28ab6477ae66abb87db7de66
e5560b8565b6dbc2ebeebc5a2841a79d0c8b1ba3
128752 F20101123_AABAYL manuel_k_Page_14.jp2
111be469a76622593bf544430043ddfe
3927745664e5266be2c3cc84ed26e97abd5e286f
69133 F20101123_AABAXY manuel_k_Page_84.jpg
c086fba8a151a630fec26ba6ccb3a5d3
2b12b6b77f7b8c1c846e33c97e14bfa81e9c1038
46935 F20101123_AABBEH manuel_k_Page_38.pro
ed7a2d5f12a3a9215d91c88bd96b0a45
3f100412e68cf5dd299f2ba6d9d8be0d1ac27f5c
108864 F20101123_AABAZA manuel_k_Page_34.jp2
951a541aa2d4b322423c9de1e0bf363e
4f98695df8876108fa6baab0eb46450e1834fca7
61447 F20101123_AABBDS manuel_k_Page_21.pro
93020590c4d411a68ff1daa62b075d1e
e292dbdb39319ce81083852ea2d33e8e74a2a29b
84797 F20101123_AABAYM manuel_k_Page_17.jp2
6bedd240ebb1572406a056c570538550
326c9aea29b4866ff5d04ff948e7d72457886d84
66189 F20101123_AABAXZ manuel_k_Page_85.jpg
091e5e0281cb41b26da914c9b053f64b
4c645512c01d92fb7d0100aa6bd326d883e9ad2f
34880 F20101123_AABBEI manuel_k_Page_39.pro
49d7714813d2ebf799a3e0bb2167b2a4
4189d620ab9219fa389cec98387ae299d1e35a3f
104145 F20101123_AABAZB manuel_k_Page_35.jp2
fb1e3aefdad31a8361d8808c56917ee4
2d7db035ce7d0637bea1277a562ef58f70a401c6
61475 F20101123_AABBDT manuel_k_Page_22.pro
643d7cca358d42210fed3ad9880311ae
b98bf072f05cc68a17cffe06ce70ae60de0d0e7d
109206 F20101123_AABAYN manuel_k_Page_18.jp2
01521af0f4e143e6d70a00b99aaedfe7
dd8b9edd9dcf7d859a04090f5dcba4b0744b27cf
102853 F20101123_AABAZC manuel_k_Page_36.jp2
5178fac427103e562936cfc99e1fa0fa
3d7cbd614ebc8696029ad4bcd60547c2b5d63692
60716 F20101123_AABBDU manuel_k_Page_23.pro
f7dd9b1acf7668e5603d11d0f5a193db
cfdcefc3cec653e9bb4191c191e5a208729c12e8
114892 F20101123_AABAYO manuel_k_Page_19.jp2
8d470170f24dd68c17d87d5500324f0d
e67d5fb6dfb10cd927fca03a4cddbca36e0656ef
73403 F20101123_AABBEJ manuel_k_Page_40.pro
191f8e8aef4c9f2c6d831658f860f8d3
e12eb96e9bb4b1e3f953578f55607b89345880df
114974 F20101123_AABAZD manuel_k_Page_37.jp2
798ae530ed79efa718d13df8a549f7bc
7312f04adfbadf0064ac6711dce23cda62df729e
38527 F20101123_AABBDV manuel_k_Page_24.pro
1d3ec986a1cecaced92e598497c43a69
d72a011b601b6fba7bcd6f85ebd84d0bd62bc98f
123878 F20101123_AABAYP manuel_k_Page_20.jp2
2de89899f6edc1b3e0adbfd625c0e450
b549ffc6e3539dab0e7ae6251367496f8c9a301f
52011 F20101123_AABBEK manuel_k_Page_41.pro
d187b2ef91d65da316ebbf02f4561b08
b932d44e0c8e916d9efe68d1abb63577f3b1f987
88686 F20101123_AABAZE manuel_k_Page_38.jp2
e2bcf4cc409fdf39073a60e2a0c88300
f7aea158fd394fdba1f3ae7f08b383b69c84d575
48840 F20101123_AABBDW manuel_k_Page_25.pro
62efe77830e25f23077d33604840864e
6e534ef54e79b07dc1bf7324f0d5f5bd266fe977
122250 F20101123_AABAYQ manuel_k_Page_21.jp2
78370085bc613e32497cf270fde3b20c
c2aadc99d7bb83f1399f5a07ef95ffbadacc83e8
49536 F20101123_AABBEL manuel_k_Page_43.pro
69b33ad4987d22a57dcc45323c8ad8a1
1477760b51ef6f597225ea29e7b5bd4dbb72a3e0
135571 F20101123_AABAZF manuel_k_Page_40.jp2
83f01ec9de848d0092109b50e57bd274
91e524a811c654f38c96dd6a43caf88a0e5a6967
58704 F20101123_AABBDX manuel_k_Page_26.pro
dbff4886405044ea778b65f7f4532d46
7b15be716b20b5272524e3c8e5ff5e782c2efbc7
117766 F20101123_AABAYR manuel_k_Page_22.jp2
41e903a8b6354ff73fe01ecbc87f88c0
7dc43051bc8b36f9cb551df7d25e76fe4bb05157
58001 F20101123_AABBFA manuel_k_Page_65.pro
600cf85e8c121aa365293ef5236c5d39
fa55f0f082a2732af99758024b83f00da37d9198
55244 F20101123_AABBEM manuel_k_Page_46.pro
bb10f995f1b8858ad12d5162959d5ee0
cffd54f791e8217d70171baf0906d571281c25f3
106811 F20101123_AABAZG manuel_k_Page_41.jp2
9133fcb8984c6097bbf0ed67eef81bf8
a08ad5aaa4c3970bf08e0013a1694eaf6b2903b0
52916 F20101123_AABBDY manuel_k_Page_27.pro
71311aadc5818778116abe7acf5658f7
740554a36adf8735b4a7c8a6016bc4a6bb03ac8c
826424 F20101123_AABAYS manuel_k_Page_24.jp2
70633b54e8739e6dbf588966e8f8645a
8f6e27db166ee918f1ffa16923e92c7adba97605
45176 F20101123_AABBFB manuel_k_Page_66.pro
c7d1ddda681795b6e74679f00a1288b6
ca2925f68108bc9b780e39d6172674b0a94528ff
23227 F20101123_AABBEN manuel_k_Page_47.pro
9442a7aa7657fea30297bce06e92ba6d
65562a0a673f05aa2693b14fa8fe96f0f7368147
109278 F20101123_AABAZH manuel_k_Page_42.jp2
f2aa452b1aa5b0848728b9a2b8629f7a
f8e2a31dbcaa884c14ba286d22770da72ed1c065
51174 F20101123_AABBDZ manuel_k_Page_28.pro
336c04208bfc4600c8dd0b862e4ec6e3
befef26ed1ce03880d09d4bafb691a809d417956
102582 F20101123_AABAYT manuel_k_Page_25.jp2
ded2d556f783ad631de381191c8ffdd0
b08e251a297105d4ac61d664ef30e38a41adbdd7
49982 F20101123_AABBFC manuel_k_Page_67.pro
07d5ae7093f1d7ddbfb6eb8706d9d1dd
da95df18e1c0918778ad29591f5968c7ca75fc47
72976 F20101123_AABBEO manuel_k_Page_48.pro
1b600c0359b6b09bc2ecbfb872028cb0
e676ae8ec1cd0d8aab71170a0ee9377812fd5e31
107655 F20101123_AABAZI manuel_k_Page_43.jp2
e1ac69a7230ed0d8ee6b6d30e040d275
b9fc1bf81416c718a558d853c0551e8cf5146ca9
114019 F20101123_AABAYU manuel_k_Page_26.jp2
0abe68c3be613b42b05c2c390489d0d5
61bcddf40321434fc884a87965fd93501da27aaf
3480 F20101123_AABBFD manuel_k_Page_68.pro
935dd14404277514a6015cac8f50b01c
56fa5a74140f7a83c1f3c57e45fbb371c8c09905
51217 F20101123_AABBEP manuel_k_Page_50.pro
84b34ea313a396f5e05e7ebfd3312fad
bfb2728747b8f7ae8d6c97e7921c9ac965a135e9
52925 F20101123_AABAZJ manuel_k_Page_47.jp2
05da553505755d2fed8a597c126ae2b7
aa084fcd370d7bebbdb35952103b4880bd6a840d
110386 F20101123_AABAYV manuel_k_Page_27.jp2
0c7c38e4cd12e276c91eb564525bfa01
abf1de66f06cc73824c02e54c24d35c1d682c63e
45652 F20101123_AABBFE manuel_k_Page_69.pro
cf88d346a578825030ae5022cf6b47b9
800cb1aa7a8d689ca4bb1829b734410a8a48912e
53705 F20101123_AABBEQ manuel_k_Page_51.pro
1943d34e04281c892c53ba4a1faa52d4
50f37308c447581a979e6a2a245ef34eda2e5986
126109 F20101123_AABAZK manuel_k_Page_48.jp2
d4b107c801869e7ffb36316a3ef262ad
c9bb7381738b22440320c2cdaa1793ce29551d24
109142 F20101123_AABAYW manuel_k_Page_28.jp2
adec4821c474565239d1f861d6f216a3
e9014540fbef9896480d46ba634a10ea81ce5494
65932 F20101123_AABBFF manuel_k_Page_71.pro
d2ffa4eeb0c9bbfef1f06d49dbf8783e
0da72f5fc48b974623f308ad81082e63ff0c7c4e
45038 F20101123_AABBER manuel_k_Page_52.pro
e0d1a2c0a832bba57d3b9e68f59fbece
187305b263f55f3a351a4e14c10d94dfc8c6f9a0
778408 F20101123_AABAZL manuel_k_Page_49.jp2
c75e37903367daaea013606cc384389c
b46c7239858bc1169604db6602394b201e41fd59
119260 F20101123_AABAYX manuel_k_Page_30.jp2
16fc02526bc0a28544642258fc559845
67da35c8431e946736c43fd24d2ad0d715585199
55601 F20101123_AABBFG manuel_k_Page_72.pro
c321e2d3bfe6c6fa00c156f82aa26353
04a7ff2711967d5be47be036071c7780e9792ee3
43436 F20101123_AABBES manuel_k_Page_53.pro
d420195e16aa2bcb91e9eea3e407c655
b3ada1857ddfcffbe500130fe4cd6c50baec9858
111337 F20101123_AABAZM manuel_k_Page_51.jp2
eeb32c46d59acd21d8bdf190fe576e88
a6b0a2b5b6b76ff63797827ddea2e7c973513159
126430 F20101123_AABAYY manuel_k_Page_32.jp2
36a50000479a14c46c3e439ea1ab254c
9ef9b41282346da4494fa9fcc419fa003bb852d0
62176 F20101123_AABBFH manuel_k_Page_73.pro
5c021c7a55cad44ed92757840d7f3ca6
db952b6d36a51ca21c14d0839bcf3d384cc0f9fc
64494 F20101123_AABBET manuel_k_Page_55.pro
aa15786d9b1ae876a185af95d2088ce0
b5e01d02fb85e10ce35ffa8fe66517265ec531d4
91233 F20101123_AABAZN manuel_k_Page_52.jp2
99b9c9e8b5d18a650497a497e499bc85
60d225c9b411334b3501187a2de3ab2fb437712a
104239 F20101123_AABAYZ manuel_k_Page_33.jp2
941b817ec455518314fe7af4bc57519c
13f50b2c484a9442e0a93b4789aff8ce0ba395a7
61121 F20101123_AABBFI manuel_k_Page_77.pro
e8f12dde4bcd6d5a2b0080f78580d01e
ac02c486eb65d41d5d27b410f381bf4afb267cb4
41882 F20101123_AABBEU manuel_k_Page_56.pro
5b9f6a2cb722e15139d5df8f02ed8540
b835bab890ad18751ea4c8c50979fb9fb1139620
99683 F20101123_AABAZO manuel_k_Page_54.jp2
20b761a02e90af7999d59d9d53aaff6d
f5e328cb8102209ad369ef86bb81d0c90518255f
52830 F20101123_AABBFJ manuel_k_Page_78.pro
414e72e477e86805d838f269f6d8c35b
39fdfcefa97258fdc6bc7a8fd578528844c04361
53854 F20101123_AABBEV manuel_k_Page_57.pro
2daf2ed7efe79ba49ee6cfa333b0f9be
1198a445f3afb562d6d33025ca33009c8987a2b3
110495 F20101123_AABAZP manuel_k_Page_55.jp2
51f0f4f665507cda18ea2a0c2904b99d
6119a648164fec0d73d70e8cc2d065cba9efb31d
54471 F20101123_AABBEW manuel_k_Page_60.pro
3f647c6cd50a5c97ee2b9ecaecb93260
b9935a03da143a481276f491f7977cc4047ff229
117207 F20101123_AABAZQ manuel_k_Page_57.jp2
eab57097aaffcf6cc4ca7b0d2654565f
2a4f237462c5566b022fe43354d2950dadb7163b
51826 F20101123_AABBFK manuel_k_Page_82.pro
0382d960284e2c774de715e9b8640448
a4f21c8a7bd1836f50683fe7155387713d4dc266
67313 F20101123_AABBEX manuel_k_Page_61.pro
9d3a784c03679da689e031a869fdb77f
a98cc79eabc028668200f464abb919466d20a590
105503 F20101123_AABAZR manuel_k_Page_58.jp2
4e4e57a97ecf01553979bdd81d32fe13
e5760938e454c288556c54c2409702b826250fcd
397 F20101123_AABBGA manuel_k_Page_08.txt
79fc70269622c6515e315125bebb5a76
9f3f52ca83d3b2c07290d8a4e636b3d3868398dc
47433 F20101123_AABBFL manuel_k_Page_83.pro
1c4c3befadc96b241ce0087b5683e8a3
ff806482813a15daa6f1575cc049841fb2d85dfb
53029 F20101123_AABBEY manuel_k_Page_62.pro
35854ae795d7ab8f3ccb55ef701a7d9f
b602b5abe43373efbf94c73f28d1f410f38c2190
106071 F20101123_AABAZS manuel_k_Page_59.jp2
9e53fba609c92d999f4c2240f693e3f9
36b6825e0fb485cd3c12707413d2d34f4e8a71ef
1672 F20101123_AABBGB manuel_k_Page_09.txt
299817e7a07141829c86db0da3878aaa
00aaed12e30e0a086f8c8d78170797125d796b4d
46270 F20101123_AABBFM manuel_k_Page_85.pro
dd568b3e5de7ca486538c726b229b8cb
259a4e41afabdb61f89af9e99b86473d632e87c7
48614 F20101123_AABBEZ manuel_k_Page_63.pro
243ccf27fdf328fa222ab707e9b9aec3
4e11f8f18d09d78b75e25db2c7b7a8f96a913bea
113023 F20101123_AABAZT manuel_k_Page_60.jp2
27d439ebc7419936cd900c671751ca3b
7b53d9fd8a4cbca7e0d5e5505e9f5c11dd1511c8
1757 F20101123_AABBGC manuel_k_Page_11.txt
d6eafee63989341c434ddd51dc7ac746
8c1b6e4becd1b47cca28e730c57f78f74bec4bd2
3974 F20101123_AABBFN manuel_k_Page_86.pro
6eb77cd1e0e8d48794ee1ba6d2c3b7b5
183b0c94b3c28128d969439b5a40bd0254411c42
112599 F20101123_AABAZU manuel_k_Page_62.jp2
2942e1b74a1b29ae4390c6a331f4b437
5db5c445dbae2fd341815d0f15e7e87bc4cd79fe
2002 F20101123_AABBGD manuel_k_Page_12.txt
70627965ba2026c007640e07de03cc51
6a5142ad27d09164c7fc0be5f47799d21266c993
42925 F20101123_AABBFO manuel_k_Page_87.pro
907a3bdd4b42dfe15aeba092d14891ec
4cb6b5d33231f190791b6891dfb15b42dd35346e
105691 F20101123_AABAZV manuel_k_Page_63.jp2
a4b90d1042cb93bc9ad10849d4d16a04
5784ec35ee6edc93de5b5cbed75d82e7f7889ab8
2038 F20101123_AABBGE manuel_k_Page_13.txt
b3dc9cb4b14a0f3a7c526a8cefb446be
dac74d12fb89f4948b0e7ae1f1a2aa9eb0351fd4
49750 F20101123_AABBFP manuel_k_Page_88.pro
6d4bd6129d3794974ecacb49e3682e4e
0e38840f9339f028be875115dd2c94bca2a86a0c
111249 F20101123_AABAZW manuel_k_Page_64.jp2
f62971002c18ecefa3272f4225adff75
f04f1f21a31e965a5cb9f19db80f0b77c6db78f7
2505 F20101123_AABBGF manuel_k_Page_14.txt
9ba7900d7e173e97281aefba16c32337
cef444582f9bec851db234e3a0035604ee649e23
20155 F20101123_AABBFQ manuel_k_Page_89.pro
54305356e45d753a7ca123e0da520d3c
b0def9a7b7d44d5fb11e3bae003d6528c30ed723
109658 F20101123_AABAZX manuel_k_Page_65.jp2
f913a4ac49f4b25434a1442d62d9f8c3
e41f10ad7cad9101e4f0a6adc1e6bcd36cb8360b
2248 F20101123_AABBGG manuel_k_Page_15.txt
8893fdcb9099c1dcb8bac38e258de677
e2e84565795dd90b5ecf85d20714aeb11fe64c1b
40693 F20101123_AABBFR manuel_k_Page_90.pro
6f7b9b135bded37fe85328f865a4878c
17c568810450c27d21a96accd1844b7a0c0a320a
93009 F20101123_AABAZY manuel_k_Page_66.jp2
f4d093e119e023eea3ce753402358c2a
1a6858c2ffa3b595ae5a285c8561ee40517f24a4
2046 F20101123_AABBGH manuel_k_Page_16.txt
f7ef916ea6762e2dfba3007b3476a03a
65a4080dd7ea06b8f0a442724bcb5fac0ee1b535
53164 F20101123_AABBFS manuel_k_Page_91.pro
340790d044bec58dfa8ad37b1d2fb4dc
71c045af7157693893bda9271b1762cb19ba6684



PAGE 1

SLAVERY, COFFEE, AND FAMILY IN A FRONTIER SOCIETY: JRMIE AND ITS HINTERLAND, 1780-1789 By KEITH ANTHONY MANUEL A THESIS PRESENTED TO THE GRADUATE SCHOOL OF THE UNIVERSITY OF FLOR IDA IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF ARTS UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA 2005

PAGE 2

Copyright 2005 by Keith Anthony Manuel

PAGE 3

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS Many people helped this thesis along from start to finish. I must first thank my committee chair, David Geggus, for his assistance throughout the life of this project, especially his patient editing just prior to my oral defense. This manuscript would also not be what it is without the perceptive comments of my two readers, Jeffrey Needell and Jon Sensbach. I must also give much credit to the staff of the Department of Area and Special Collections and the Latin American Collection of the University of Florida Libraries for their assistance in gathering together the primary and secondary material I used in this project. Particular gratitude is due to Bruce Chappell for key professional and, at times, critical personal support. Others who have helped one way or another (some more than they can know) include Peter Wolf, David Wheat, Maury Wiseman, Mil Willis, and Julia Frederick. Finally, I must thank my family for supporting me, especially in the last frantic stages of writing. My wife, Bridget, who deserves much credit for her patience with my preoccupation, and my daughter, Rebecca, have given me the strength to carry it through. iii

PAGE 4

TABLE OF CONTENTS page ACKNOWLEDGMENTS .................................................................................................iii LIST OF TABLES .............................................................................................................vi LIST OF FIGURES .........................................................................................................viii ABSTRACT .......................................................................................................................ix CHAPTER 1. INTRODUCTION AND HISTORIOGRAPHICAL REVIEW......................................1 2. GOVERNANCE, ECONOMY, AND SOCIETY..........................................................8 Geographical Overview................................................................................................9 Society........................................................................................................................16 Economy.....................................................................................................................21 Planters and Plantations..............................................................................................32 Conclusions.................................................................................................................37 3. PLANTATION SLAVERY IN THE GRANDE-ANSE..............................................38 The Naming of Slaves and Ethnicity..........................................................................43 The Slaves Diet.........................................................................................................49 Occupational Mobility on Coffee Plantations............................................................53 Housing and Community............................................................................................55 Conclusions.................................................................................................................57 4. FAMILY, RACE, AND PATRONAGE IN THE GRANDE-ANSE BEFORE THE FRENCH REVOLUTION..........................................................................................59 Religious Belief..........................................................................................................73 The Free Coloreds Rise Up.........................................................................................74 Conclusion..................................................................................................................75 5. CONCLUSION.............................................................................................................77 iv

PAGE 5

LIST OF REFERENCES...................................................................................................80 BIOGRAPHICAL SKETCH.............................................................................................83 v

PAGE 6

LIST OF TABLES Table page 2-1. Population Increase in the Parish of Jrmie...............................................................9 2-2. Militia Enrollment by Race, 1751-1789....................................................................20 2-3. Summary of Property Ownership in Saint-Domingue, Listed by Major Ports of Embarkation, 1788...................................................................................................22 2-4. Export Statistics, 1788...............................................................................................25 2-5. Annual Commodity Production in the Grande-Anse, 1788 (Thousands of Pounds).....................................................................................................................25 2-6. Sample of Slaving Vessels Calling at Jrmie, 1788-1791.......................................26 2-7. Immigrants to the Grande-Anse, 1780-1789.............................................................28 2-8. Slave and Landholding on 13 Coffee and Mixed-Crop Plantations in the Grande-Anse, 1780-1792......................................................................................................33 2-9. Real property Owned by the Berquier Family, ca. 1803, for which the Family Received Compensation...........................................................................................36 3-1. Numbers of Africans and Creoles on Eighteen Coffee and Mixed-Crop Plantations in the Grande-Anse, 1780-1792 (N=551)..............................................40 3-2. Summary of the Origins of Slaves on Coffee and Mixed-Crop Plantations in the GrandAnse (N=606)................................................................................................41 3-3. Some Factors Bearing on Slave Life on Eighteen Coffee and Mixed-Crop Plantations, 1780-1792, Based on Notarized Plantation Inventories.......................42 3-4. Slave Fertility Indexes on Eighteen Coffee and Mixed-Crop Plantations by Size of Plantation Workforce, 1782-1792........................................................................43 3-5. The Origins of Slaves on Eighteen Coffee and Mixed-Crop Plantations in the Grande-Anse, 1780-1792 (N=606)..........................................................................45 3-6. Profiles of Commandeurs on Coffee and Mixed-Crop Plantations in the Grande-Anse, 1780-1792......................................................................................................55 vi

PAGE 7

3-7. Slave Housing on Small and Middling Coffee and Mixed-Crop Plantations in the Grande-Anse, 1780-1789 (N=9)..............................................................................56 4-1. Infants Baptized in the Parish of Jrmie, 1781........................................................59 4-2. Occupations of Male Testators (N=23).....................................................................61 4-3. Marriage Choice among the Gens de couleur libres (N=20)....................................71 vii

PAGE 8

LIST OF FIGURES Figure page 2-1. Urban Development in Jrmie, 1765-1788..............................................................14 3-1. Population Pyramid of the Workforces on Eighteen Coffee and Mixed-Crop Plantations in the Grande-Anse, 1782-1792 (N=551)..............................................39 viii

PAGE 9

Abstract of Thesis Presented to the Graduate School of the University of Florida in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Arts SLAVERY, COFFEE, AND FAMILY IN A FRONTIER SOCIETY: JRMIE AND ITS HINTERLAND, 1780-1789 By Keith Anthony Manuel August 2005 Chair: David Patrick Geggus Major Department: History Between the end of the Seven Years War in 1763 and the spread of the French Revolution to the island in 1791, coffee became an important export crop in the French colony of Saint-Domingue (present-day Haiti). This crop proliferated in the colonys mountains where sugar could not be grown profitably. The resulting coffee boom drew thousands of new colonists from Europe, the French West Indies, and Louisiana who imported tens of thousands of slaves. This thesis sheds light on the conditions of life during the coffee boom in the vicinity of the town of Jrmie in the southwestern part of Saint-Domingue. This previously neglected region received its share of both colonists and slaves. The thesis uncovers some details about the lives of the colonists, including to some degree their marriage patterns (i.e., interracial vs. intraracial marriages), the degree to which they were able to exploit their landholdings, and personal relationships between whites and free people of color. Some light is also shed on the lives of the slaves who daily worked ix

PAGE 10

the coffee groves. The thesis includes a quantitative analysis of a sample of these slaves based on slave lists included in inventories of coffee and mixed crop estates (i.e., plantations planted in coffee and either cotton or cacao). Finally, the thesis also establishes some previously unknown details about free colored men who led the local fight against white supremacy in the early years of the revolution. Notarized documents provide some interesting details about Nol Azor and Jacques Lafond, who led free coloreds and slaves in revolt at Fond dIcaque in 1791. Documentation consulted for this thesis suggeststhat free coloreds did not own much land devoted to coffee cultivation but rather that a few free coloreds did become coffee planters in Jrmie, largely due to capital inherited from their white fathers. x

PAGE 11

CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION AND HISTORIOGRAPHICAL REVIEW The town of Jrmie in southwestern Saint-Domingue and its hinterland, known as the Grande-Anse, experienced a frenetic expansion in coffee production in the 1770s and 1780s. This was the regions third economic boom during the eighteenth century. In the 1730s, cacao had become a major plantation staple, and in the 1750s coffee began to expand. This latter boom apparently continued until 1774, when coffee prices fell. Between 1783, when prices recovered, and 1791, the outbreak of the Haitian Revolution, coffee spread through the highlands of Saint-Domingue, and the Grande-Anse was one focus of this expanding coffee frontier. 1 Jrmie was the principal urban area of one of the colonys 52 parishes and was the seat of one of its 26 quartiers, administrative (though not always judicial) units that usually encompassed more than one ecclesiastical parish. Though it had the privilege to engage in international commerce, Jrmie remained a second-rate port largely subordinate to the colonys major entrepts, Port-au-Prince and Cap Franais, although in the late 1780s French ships began calling at Jrmie in greater numbers. All the while, contraband trade probably remained extensive, particularly with the English in Jamaica and the Dutch at Curaao. In 1788, along with other agricultural and industrial enterprises, Saint-Domingue had 2,810 cafteries (coffee plantations) and 792 sucreries (sugar plantations); 105 of the 1 To clarify, I use the word region here and hereafter in reference to the Grande-Anse as a part of Saint-Domingue. 1

PAGE 12

2 former and 8 of the latter were in the quartier of Jrmie. Although only a small contributor to the overall colonial economy, Jrmie did export the majority of the coffee originating in the South Province, which developed in large part following the Seven Years War (1756-1763). Although regional trade statistics are easily accessible only for 1788 and 1789, it is clear that Jrmie and the colonys other highland regions experienced a boom in both the production of export commodities and population. 2 The immigrants who revolutionized society in the Grande-Anse in particular and highland Saint-Domingue in general came from three quite different sources. First, the coffee boom drew immigrants from other parts of the colony and from other possessions of the French Crown in the West Indies. Second, immigrants from Frances Atlantic ports, both rich and poor, arrived in the Grande-Anse intent on making their fortune. Finally, and most important numerically, were the thousands of slaves that arrived aboard French (and foreign interloping) slave ships (ngriers) from the coast of West and West-Central Africa. Highland regions like the Grande-Anse that had once been the home primarily of maroons, free colored smallholders, and feral pigs became by 1789 the fastest growing sector of the colonys economy, far surpassing the sugar complex in its rate of growth. The significant changes that coffee fostered brought great change to society in the Grande-Anse. The present study intends to assess some of these changes through an examination of documentary sources on life in this region in the 1780s, a period in which the coffee boom was well underway but before the French Revolution impacted the colony. 2 I discuss trade and population estimates in greater detail in Chapter 1, below. This brief exposition is meant to be present a general vision of the effect of the coffee boom on society.

PAGE 13

3 The first issue to consider is the changes that the coffee boom promoted in economic relationships and land usage. At a very general level, the volume of shipping visiting Jrmie quadrupled in only a few years. This increase reflects more ships calling at Jrmie to engage in both trans-Atlantic commerce and the coasting trade (cabotage). The boom in population that echoed the boom in coffee production yielded a six-fold increase in the free population and nearly an eight-fold increase in the slave population between 1751 and 1789. Landholders both sold out to newcomers as land prices rose and engaged in virulent speculation. In many cases, landholders exchanged slaves for marginal land what had always been a capital-scarce economy. The second issue is the great increase in the slave population in the Grande-Anse from a little over 2,000 individuals in 1751 to a round 17,000 in 1789 by official estimates. Taking into consideration slave mortality during and after the seasoning process, many more than 15,000 arrived through Jrmie, smaller ports, or, less likely, overland from other parts of Saint-Domingue. Lacking data on the slave trade and other striking aspects of slavery such as marronage, I constrained myself instead to an examination of the material conditions that slaves faced in that Grande-Anse such as diet, housing, and labor. Included in this analysis are those aspects of slave social organization that can be derived from plantation inventories, namely work specialization and maternity. In doing so, I have tried to engage with the scholarship on slave life, specifically in late eighteenth-century Saint-Domingue. David P. Gegguss articles on sugar and coffee in particular have proven useful to my analysis of coffee production in the Grande-Anse. Geggus and Michael Cratons analyses of plantation slave labor in the French and British Caribbean, respectively, have shown me how to analyze slave lists

PAGE 14

4 quantitatively. For matters relative to the slave family, I have drawn methodological inspiration from B. W. Higmans Slave Populations of the British Caribbean, 1807-1834, and my brief discussion of slave disease and nutrition draws from Kenneth F. Kiples The Caribbean Slave: A Biological History. Finally, I have drawn general conclusions about slave life in Saint-Domingue from Gabriel Debiens studies of the French Caribbean that culminated in his Les esclaves aux Antilles franaises. 3 The final locus of my analysis is the free population, both white and colored. There is no better place to begin than Mederic-Louis-lie Moreau de Saint-Mrys voluminous Description topographique, physique, civile, politique et historique de la partie franaise de lisle Saint-Domingue, one colonial subjects portrayal of Frances most important American possession on the eve of the revolution. Part of the attraction of Moreaus work is that it contains all the biases of a member of the white upper class. Although his primary purpose was to write a natural history of Saint-Domingue for the colonial scientific society, he also discusses Enlightenment-era pseudo-scientific racism, the Atlantic slave trade, and slave culture in tantalizing detail. 4 In 1982, Michel-Rolph Trouillot made open the way to more modern analyses of Saint-Domingues free people of color by synthesizing the available printed primary and secondary literature in his article Motion in the System: Coffee, Color, and Slavery in 3 David P. Geggus, Sugar and Coffee Cultivation in Saint Domingue and the Shaping of the Slave Labor Force, in Ira Berlin and Philip D. Morgan, eds., Cultivation and Culture: Labor and the Shaping of Slave Life in the Americas (Charlottesville: University Press of Virginia, 1993); Michael Craton, Empire, Enslavement and Freedom in the Caribbean (Kingston: Randle Publishers, 1997); B. W. Higman, Slave Populations of the British Caribbean, 1807-1834 (Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press, 1984), 364-73; Kenneth F. Kiple, The Caribbean Slave: A Biological History (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1984). 4 Mederic-Louis-lie Moreau de Saint-Mry, Description topographique, physique, civile, politique et historique de la partie franaise de lisle Saint-Domingue, edited by Blanche Maurel and tienne Taillemitte (3 vols; Paris: Socit de LHistoire des Colonies Franaises, 1958).

PAGE 15

5 Eighteenth-Century Saint-Domingue. In his analysis of the people of color, Trouillot integrated the top-down approach of world systems theory with a bottom-up perspective that took into consideration the historical agency of individuals in the colony. He concluded that demands for coffee in the core areas of the world system allowed a middling class of coffee planters to arise to meet that need. 5 Two major treatments of the socioeconomic rise of Saint-Domingues free coloreds have come forward since Trouillots seminal work. In 1988, John Garrigus completed his dissertation at Johns Hopkins University entitled A Struggle for Respect: The Free Coloreds of Saint Domingue, 1770-1779, in which he examined the rise of the Raimond family of the South Province using previously untapped notarial documents. Garriguss remains the best analysis to date on the colonys free people of color. Based on his analysis of notarized documents from several southern parishes, he challenges Trouillots contention that coffee brought great wealth to free coloreds. Garrigus found no great increase in free colored wealth through the exploitation of coffee plantations. The free colored elites whom he studied invested instead in indigo cultivation and received great returns through contraband with Dutch and German merchant houses. 6 In 2001, Stewart R. King published the second major examination of the prosperity of the free coloreds with his book Blue Coat or Powdered Wig: Free People of Color in Pre-Revolutionary Saint Domingue. King argues extensively but not convincingly for a 5 Michel-Rolph Trouillot, Motion in the System: Coffee, Color, and Slavery in Eighteenth-Century Saint-Domingue, Review 8 (Winter 1982): 331-88; and Trouillot, Coffee Planters and Coffee Slaves in the Antilles: The Impact of a Secondary Crop, in Ira Berlin and Philip D. Morgan, eds., Cultivation and Culture: Labor and the Shaping of Slave Life in the Americas (Charlottesville: University Press of Virginia, 1993): 124-37. 6 John D. Garrigus, A Struggle for Respect: The Free Coloreds of Saint Domingue, 1770-1779 (Ph.D. diss., Johns Hopkins University, 1989).

PAGE 16

6 typology dividing economically prominent free coloreds into a military elite and a planter elite. In effect, his typology imposes on colonial Saint-Domingue what was a reality only in late revolutionary and postcolonial Haiti: a black military elite, drawn largely from the slave elite, and a mulatto planter elite that continued their role as planters in late colonial society. 7 My analysis of the people of color in the vicinity of Jrmie is intended in part as a critique of Blue Coat or Powdered Wig. Through my examination of the Grande-Anse before the spread of the revolution, I seek to establish the types of personal relationships and economic roles held by free coloreds and whites in the coffee frontier. I avoid making restrictive models and instead describe the activities of some of the most prominent families of both races, using such documentation as marriage contracts, testaments, donations, and baptismal entries to reconstruct kinship and pseudo-kinship networks that proved so important in Jrmien society. Like King and Garrigus, however, my study contributes to the historiography of the Haitian Revolution by establishing the socioeconomic background of free coloreds who joined others like them to appeal for the civil rights of free non-whites in the French Atlantic world. In order to document socioeconomic conditions in this isolated settlement, I utilized the Jrmie Papers, a manuscript collection held by the Department of Area and Special Collections of the University of Florida libraries. This collection of approximately six thousand documents consists of some five thousand notarized instruments as well as a number of ecclesiastical and civil registers. Because the fragmentary civil court registers did not yield much useful historical data for the 1780s, I 7 Stewart R. King, Blue Coat or Powdered Wig: Free People of Color in Pre-Revolutionary Saint Domingue (Athens: University of Georgia Press, 2001).

PAGE 17

7 have instead relied almost entirely on the notarial papers. The latter have yielded a great deal of detail about the lives of rural landowners (habitants), urban dwellers, and slaves. I have focused largely on the papers of three notaries: matre 8 Thomas (1787-1793), matre Girard (1780-1792), and Lpine (1780-1792), amounting to approximately 800 documents, while also consulting the ecclesiastical register for 1781, the only one falling within the parameters of this study extant in its entirety in the Jrmie Papers. Given what these sources can tell us, I have chosen to focus on the coffee plantations and the slaves who worked them in the 1780s, while not neglecting what I have discovered about life in what appear to be two of the other major sectors of the Grande-Anses population: the urban areas (of which the town of Jrmie was the largest) and the smallholders who grew plantains and manioc in marginal rural areas. I hope that this study proves useful to the debates on slave demography and free colored social organization. Although my sample sizes are small, my analysis of these issues is the first for the Grande-Anse, whose colonial period has not been studied since Moreau de Saint-Mry published his Description . de la partie franaise. 8 Matre was the proper title of address to notaries, surveyors, and some other public functionaries. The personal name of matre Thomas was Paul-Franois-Charles. The personal names of the other two notaries are unknown.

PAGE 18

CHAPTER 2 GOVERNANCE, ECONOMY, AND SOCIETY The coffee boom of the late eighteenth century brought a period of phenomenal growth in economic activity to highland regions of Saint-Domingue that had previously been of marginal importance. Rapid economic growth encouraged a rapid increase in population. Everywhere the free colored population grew the fastest. On the eve of the French Revolution, the population of the parish of Jrmie represented roughly 2,000 (20%) of the whites, 1,000 (10%) of the free coloreds, and over 18,000 (about 21%) of the slaves in the South Province. At that time, about 30,000 resident whites, perhaps 30,000 free coloreds, and close to half a million slaves were in the entire colony (see Table 2-1). In 1788, the town of Jrmie exported 6.5% of the 68 million pounds of coffee that legally entered the international market from Saint-Domingue, then the worlds largest producer of that commodity. 1 Finally, Jrmie contributed nearly 2.6% of the royal customs duties collected in the colony that year. Despite the relative insignificance of Jrmies fiscal, commercial, and demographic weight relative to other regions of Saint-Domingue, it is significant to understanding the history of that colony because its rapid growth rate during the expansion of coffee cultivation in the 1770s and 1 This calculation (2.6%) does not reflect the coffee that left the Grande-Anse aboard coasting vessels bound either for other ports in the colony or to other colonies (e.g., Jamaica). Suggestive of how great the undercounting was are the customs records kept during the British occupation of the region (1793-1798). According to what David Geggus relates, the Grande-Anse exported nearly 16 million pounds of coffee in 1794 and nearly 17 million the following year. These latter figures amount to 3.6 and 3.8 times the tonnage of coffee exported from the region five years before. David Patrick Geggus, Slavery, War and Revolution: The British Occupation of Saint Domingue, 1793-1798 (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1982), 402. 8

PAGE 19

9 1780s and its peculiar position as the unique stronghold of white supremacy during much of the revolutionary 1790s. Table 2-1. Population Increase in the Parish of Jrmie Year Whites Libres Free Population Slave Population 2 Total 1751 387 109 496 2,147 2,643 1788 2,000 1,000 3,000 18,774 20,000 Increase 1613 891 2504 14,853 17357 % 516.79 917.43 604.84 791.80 756.71 Source: Census data cited in Moreau de Saint-Mry, Description . de la partie franaise, 3: 1400-1401. Geographical Overview Under the ancien rgime, the French Crown divided Saint-Domingue into three provinces, or parties, named the North, the West, and the South. Twelve major towns that served commercial, social, administrative, and religious functions dotted the coast of the colony. In the North, the major urban center was Cap Franais, also known as Le Cap, which was also the commercial capital of the colony. It was also the center of Saint-Domingues cultural life and was a veritable city of stone akin in size and function to a metropolitan provincial capital. In the West was the official colonial capital at Port-au-Prince, a much younger and less developed town than Le Cap. Although the economy of Jrmie remained bound to these two ports, by 1788 it had attracted some trans-Atlantic commerce. 3 2 Contemporaries disagreed on the size of Saint-Domingues slave population. In Table 2-1, I relied on the figures Moreau de Saint-Mry gives in his Description . de la partie franaise, except for the slave population, for which I turned to those Intendant Franois Barb-Marbois listed in his tat des finances de Saint Domingue (Paris, 1790). I preferred the latter because he gave exact figures, not round numbers as Moreau did. 3 For the sake of clarity, I will refer to the principal town as Jrmie and its jurisdiction as the Grande-Anse. Jrmien will likewise be the adjective applied to things of the Grande-Anse and particularly of Jrmie. Although it has an interesting history of its own, I neglect Cap Dame Marie in this study in favor of its more developed neighbor to the east. On Jrmies trade with Le Cap and Port-au-Prince, see Moreau, Description . de la partie franaise, 3: 1385. On the primacy of the latter two ports in the

PAGE 20

10 The second level of administration in the colony was the quartier (quarter), a political department that included two or more parishes, which were both civil and ecclesiastical divisions. The quartier de la Grande-Anse encompassed the northwestern tip of present-day Haitis southern peninsula and encompassed two parishes, which were both ecclesiastical and civil territorial divisions. The boundaries of the quartier were the sea to the north and west, mountains to the south, and, beyond dense forests, the quartier du Petit-Trou de Nippes to the east. The physical isolation of the Grande-Anse made water-borne transport of great importance to the colonists for long-range travel. The small herds of horses and mules on most plantations belie the importance of beasts of burden for short-range transport, such as shipping coffee to market. 4 Of the two parishes in the Grande-Anse, that of Jrmie had a greater role in the coffee boom and experienced a much greater increase in population in the latter half of the eighteenth century. The western division, Cap Dame Marie, was less developed and less populous in the 1780s, having only whites, 220 freedmen (affranchis), and about 4,500 slaves, at the end of the decade. 5 The boundary between Cap Dame Marie and Jrmie was LAnse Clerc, a point from which one could follow the road east to the bourg (small town) of Trou Bonbon, which in the late 1780s had 15 housesone of them was a billiard halland a private cemetery. The town of Jrmie lay three leagues further economic life of the colony, see David P. Geggus, The Major Port Towns of Saint Domingue in the Later Eighteenth Century, in Franklin W. Knight and Peggy K. Liss, eds., Atlantic Port Cities: Economy, Culture, and Society in the Atlantic World, 1650-1850 (Knoxville: University of Tennessee Press, 1991), esp. 89-96. Jrmien merchants tended to send their coffee, cotton, sugar, and indigo to Le Cap and Port-au-Prince in exchange for clothing, wheat flour, and other manufactures, rather than to the principal town in the South, Les Cayes, which lay on the other side of the peninsula beyond high mountains. 4 None of the plantation inventories surveyed indicate that coffee planters had any other means of transport, neither carts or wagons nor canoes. Moreau de Saint-Mry, Description . de la partie franaise, 1: 1375 5 Ibid., 3: 1373.

PAGE 21

11 east. East of Jrmie, from west to east, were the cantons (districts) of La Guinaude, La Voldrogue, La Grande-Rivire, and Les Roseaux, each named for the river that passed through it. Located between the mouths of the River Voldrogue and the Grande-Rivire, Le Vieux Bourg, the original site of settlement before Jrmie became the regions principal urban area. 6 Further east past Les Roseaux was the bourg of Les Camittes. South and east of Les Camittes were the cantons of Fond dIcaque, Le Dsert, and Plymouth. 7 The town of Jrmie was the principal urban center of the parish of Jrmie and the locus of the Quartier de la Grande-Anses administrative, fiscal, and ecclesiastical structures. The royal administration maintained an aide-major and an officier de la marine in Jrmie. These officials were charged, respectively, with defense of the quarter and the management of finances, responsibilities roughly corresponding with those of the governor-general and the intendant of the colony. Judicial responsibilities rested with the snchausse, a tribunal composed of the court registrar (commis greffier), the royal attorney (procureur du Roi), and the seneschal, who embodied royal justice in his jurisdiction. On Fridays, the seneschal heard civil and criminal cases, received memorials on a variety of private matters, and oversaw public auctions. On Saturdays, he heard maritime cases in his role as admiralty judge. 8 The justice system employed a wide 6 The royal government divided urban centers in Saint-Domingue between villes (towns) and bourgs (small towns). Jrmie was the only ville in the Grande-Anse, while there were several bourgs: Cap Dame Marie, Les Abricots, Trou Bonbon, Les Camittes, and Le Vieux Bourg. 7 Ibid., 3: 1378-79. 8 During his tenure as seneschal of Jrmie, Elise Louis Demonzeuil utilized the official title of conseiller du Roy, Snchal Juge Civil Criminal & de police au Sige Royal de Jrmie. M. le Snchal made frequent appearances at important social events such weddings and baptisms. Petition to the Snchal for Chevalier Duhaut to marry, 11 March 1779, JP-G. James E. McClellan III provides an excellent synopsis of the royal bureaucracy in his Colonialism and Science: Saint Domingue in the Old Regime (Baltimore: The

PAGE 22

12 variety of public officials, including a jailer, eight notaries, seven bailiffs, and five attorneys. 9 For his part, the officier de la marine maintained port facilities in the quartier. Jrmies location provided little protection for ships in the harbor and houses along its roadstead from harsh northerly winds. Smaller vessels used for the coasting trade (caboteurs) could moor between the roadstead and a rock in the harbor called Le Mouton, but ships with a draught of more than 11 or 12 feet found no shelter from the wind. Although vulnerable to the wind, ships moored at Jrmie in need of repairs could obtain cordage, sailcloth, and other naval supplies from the royal warehouses. 10 A better anchorage could be had at Les Camites in the extreme eastern part of the quartier, where, in 1788, 20 sloops and schooners engaged in the coasting trade with important ports in the West: Logane, Port-au-Prince, and Saint-Marc. From Les Camites, these coasters carried away coffee and indigo from the eastern cantons of Plymouth and Fond dIcaque. Two private wharfs operated there, including LEmbarcadre Laurince, where a free colored woman and her white business partner operated a warehouse for the production of plantations in its vicinity. The importance of Les Camites to the commerce of the eastern Grande-Anse prompted the administration to maintain a post office and a customs officer there. 11 The smaller bourgs located along the Johns Hopkins University Press, 1992), Chapter 2. On the snchausse, see ibid., 44. 9 Jrmies snchausse was smaller than those of Le Cap and Port-au-Prince and met one day a week, a fourth as often as those in the larger towns. Moreau de Saint-Mry, Description . de la partie franaise, 3: 1383; Geggus, Major Port Towns, 100; and McClellan, Colonialism and Science, 44. 10 Moreau de Saint-Mry, Description . de la partie franaise, 3: 1383-84. 11 At LEmbarcadre Laurince, the free colored woman Laurince dite Lachaume operated a warehouse for local planters with the white navigator Sr. Joseph Pjac. On the proprietors of LEmbarcadre Laurince, see L6A-141 JP-N. For Moreaus description of the Grande-Anses port facilities, see his Description, 3:

PAGE 23

13 coast appear to have been transshipment points from which small watercraft brought plantation produce to Jrmie, as well as points of departure for vessels engaged in the coasting trade, both legal and contraband. Since its official founding in 1756, Jrmie experienced rapid urban development. Though the number of domiciles only increased to 80 in the four years after 1765, as the coffee boom drew more immigrants, the number of houses jumped to 125 by 1783 and 180 by 1788. The high level of rents paid on urban property in Jrmiehigher than in the capitalalso suggests rapid urban development (Figure 2-1). The town was divided into two parts. The first part, La Basse-Ville, was made up of one major street, La Rue Basse de la Marine, which ran west to east along the roadstead. Merchants and traders arriving from French metropolitan and Caribbean ports rented small houses along the roadstead that served as residence, warehouse, and, in the case of slave traders, slave-pens. In 1788, 70 houses occupied the 69 town lots (emplacements) in the lower half of the town. Because of the constant arrivals and departures of traders, the lease of urban property became a lucrative business, as did the operation of inns and taverns. 12 One local entrepreneur, S. Agostino Viale, bought up much property in this quarter of town, including one structure with five bedrooms, whose former owner, an innkeeper, included a family of four slaves and a billiard table in the deal. 13 1383-84, 1400. 12 Moreau noticed that in 1788 rents had tripled in ten years time. Moreau de Saint-Mry, Description . de la partie franaise, 3: 1380, 1383. 13 On this property in particular, see Sale of maison, ngres, etc. from Sr. Franois Lpine dit Francisquain to Sr. Agustin Viall [sic], 20 May 1783, L6A-59, JP-N. See also Sale of town lot from Mr. Augustin Hermitte to Sr. Augustin Viall [sic], 16 December 1785, L6A-145, ibid. For sales of adjacent properties mentioning Viales proprietorship, see 1 December 1786, G5-109A, ibid.; and 16 June 1787, L6B-100. Another owner of an inn, Sr. Antoine Pradel took on a white cook as his partner in September 1787. Their contract reveals how one inn looked in Jrmie. Pradel put up 4601 livres worth of furnishings,

PAGE 24

14 0204060801001201401601802001765176917831788YearNumber of House s Jrmie Figure 2-1. Urban Development in Jrmie, 1765-1788 Establishments in the service sector like that of Viale attended to the needs of merchants and others passing through the port on business. Trading houses and individual merchants who worked locally owned or rented their own urban property, as is indicated by the accounts of Jrmien merchants, especially those whose creditors left a sufficient paper trail. One of those most prominent in the notarial archives was the house of Griolet, Bastide & Compagnie. Like slave trader Pierre Toiry, they were local merchants without any clear ties to metropolitan merchant houses. The company sold imported goods to smallholders, planters, and smaller merchants in the outlying districts and facilitated the export of coffee and other commodities produced locally in return. The death of Griolet provoked the sudden descent of creditors upon the firms headquarters in Jrmie, and the a fourth of which value was his billiard table, its twelve cues, and balls. Suggestive of the scope of Pradels business, or maybe an indicator of his optimism, he brought place settings, liquor glasses, and small mirrors sufficient for 24 lodgers, in addition to large stores of white and red wine and a cow, presumably for fresh milk.Partnership between Pradel and Magu, 29 September 1787, M1-19, JP-N.

PAGE 25

15 resulting appraisal of its many debts and acquisitions convinced the other partners to retire promptly to France. 14 Three paths created by the erosion of water served as the only connection between the merchants quarter and the rest of the town. The upper town, La Haute-Ville, was planned around a rectangular parade ground lined with elm trees on three sides. The fourth side, which faced the sea, was left open for use as a public market where petty traders, slaves, and rural smallholders sold their wares. Eleven streets running parallel to the parade grounds short side intersected six others at right angles. Despite this careful planning, the unpaved streets of La Haute-Ville filled with choking dust in dry weather, and wet weather reduced them to muddy expanses that threatened the stability of the elm trees planted along their edges. 15 Another problem was the nearly total lack of public buildings in Jrmie. The snchausse and admiralty court met in a house owned by the Crown. There was no church, either. The parish instead rented a private house for the use of worshippers and another as a rectory on a town lot shared with the royal powder magazine. 16 Perhaps more serious was the lack of drinking water, which had to be either drawn from shallow wells (drinking from which, Moreau de Saint-Mry, notes was a courageous act) or brought from springs more than a league away. The Crown had promised a public fountain to be placed in the middle of the parade ground since the townspeople demanded one in 1764, 14 Griolet, Bastide & Compagnie owned a house on the roadstead in Le Vieux Bourg and had commercial contacts with a merchant residing at the bourg of Trou Bonbon. Settlement of accounts, 29 June 1790, M1-89. 15 Moreau de Saint-Mry, Description . de la partie franaise, 3: 1380-81. 16 Ibid., 3: 1380-86.

PAGE 26

16 but the pipes necessary for its construction did not arrive before the outbreak of the revolution. 17 Society In the 1780s, Grande-Anse society exhibited the three tiers characteristic of slave societies in the Caribbean. At the top, elite whites, or grands blancs, owned the grandest plantations and controlled international commerce and royal administrative and judicial offices. Poor whites, or petits blancs, often immigrants from France and other parts of Europe, occupied many different economic roles, as artisans, storekeepers, sailors, and plantation managers. Though it is not clear how most small and middling coffee planters accumulated the capital with which to establish their plantations, some European-born artisans formed partnerships to run coffee estates, and young men of color sometimes followed a similar strategy. 18 At the bottom, a largely African-born slave population worked primarily as field slaves on coffee, cacao, cotton, sugar, indigo, and mixed-crop plantations. 19 Some had more prestigious jobs, most of which were reserved exclusively for men: as commandeurs (slave drivers), artisans, sailors, and domestic and personal servants in masters households both in town and in the countryside. Finally, the middle stratum, free people of color (gens de couleur libres) filled many of the same economic 17 Ibid., 3: 1381. 18 The progenitor of the Descoufler family (who changed their name to Lescouflaire in the mid-1780s), for instance, arrived before the coffee boom and worked as a petty trader (marchand) until his death in the late 1780s. His son Antoine became a trader like his father and Franois became a baker, but Nicolas Lescouflaire sold a coasting vessel in 1785, acquired a coffee plantation at Trou Bonbon, and subsequently married into the Brisson family, which included as its members coffee planters and the owner of a coasting vessel. Donation of real estate, 31 August 1792, M1-6; sale of a balaon, 8 March 1785, L6A-99; and Marriage contract, 15 July 1785, G5-99. 19 As I use it here and hereafter, mixed-crop plantations were rural units of production that grew coffee and some other cash crops, usually cacao and/or cotton.

PAGE 27

17 roles as the petits blancs. As a general rule, those of lightest complexion had a better chance of owning small coffee or coffee-and-cacao plantations than multres libres (free mulattoes), who tended to be artisans. Free black men appear less often as coffee planters than free coloreds. They predominated the local police force, though some also owned market gardens. As was the case in other regions of Saint-Domingue not involved in sugar production, the coffee boom of the 1770s and 1780s facilitated great social and economic change in the Grande-Anse. It is important to note that unlike their counterparts in other marginal quarters of the colony, free coloreds in the Grande-Anse did not become numerically predominant. Rather, the majority of the free population was considered white in the 1750s, and the same was true in the 1780s. While most of the free people of color were of mixed African and European descent, a sample of eighteen of Jrmies 105 cafteries indicates that the vast majority of slaves (98.5%) on these plantations (N=602) were black. 20 Taken together, the three strata grew by a factor of over 7.5 in 38 years (see Table 2-1), with the greatest growth among the free coloreds (917.43%), followed by the slaves (756.71%). After the Seven Years War, both rich and poor immigrants flooded Saint-Domingue from Frances Atlantic ports and, to a lesser extent, Canada and Louisiana. At the same time, the free people of color became more numerous through natural increase, the manumission of slaves, and official reclassification. 21 20 For further discussion of Jrmies slave population, see Chapter 2, below. 21 Charles Frostin, Les rvoltes blanches Saint-Domingue aux XVIIe et XVIIIe sicles (Paris: Lcole, 1975), Chapter 6. For a discussion of the immigration from Louisiana to Cap Franais, see Julia Carpenter Frederick, Luis de Unzaga and Bourbon Reform in Spanish Louisiana, 1770-1776 (Ph.D. diss., Louisiana State University, 2000), 104-106.

PAGE 28

18 During the seventeenth and much of the eighteenth century, persons of African descent did not face any significant discrimination based on their ancestry. In his 1685 slave code written for French colonies overseas, the Code Noir, Louis XIV divided his colonial subjects into two juridical categories, slave and free, and John Garriguss research on the Raimond family confirms in part that this was true. Following the Seven Years War, however, the Crown took certain measures to limit the ambitions of free people of color. The royal government began to redefine persons of African descent as a caste apart from the rest of free society. Hommes de couleur libres (free men of color) could no longer serve as commissioned officers in the colonial militia, and, beginning in the 1780s, people of color were denied usage of honorific titles such as Monsieur and Madame in official paperwork such as ecclesiastical records and notarized bills of sale. 22 As Charles Frostin argues, in the early to mid-eighteenth century, white immigrants to Saint-Domingue became plantation owners by managing an absentee planters estate and embezzling enough to start their own plantations. In the last half of the century, however, the flood of immigrants arriving each year glutted the free labor market, making it more difficult for small whites to find a job in the first place. In the case of the Grande-Anse, petits blancs had to compete not only with one another but also with colored artisans already established in the building trades. In the face of increasing discrimination against them, people of color worked out ways to improve their position in free society. Stewart R. King has recently argued that some men of color (in his words, a military elite) continued to use military service as a unifying principle while others forming a planter elite kept close personal and 22 Frostin, Les rvoltes blanches, Chapter 6.

PAGE 29

19 commercial ties with white society. 23 In her work Dominque Rogers has stressed that free coloreds established formal relationships with whites such as apprenticeships and business contracts while usually marrying persons of their own phenotype. 24 Considering these recent developments in the historiography, it is necessary to compare race relations in the Grande-Anse with those described by Rogers and King, both of whom studied the North and West. Unlike in Kings typology, the Quartier de la Grande-Anse generated no military elite, but members of a small free colored planter elite did have commercial and personal ties with whites. Some free colored women had business relationships with lower-class white men either formalized through notarized contracts or kept as informal, oral agreements. The most common arrangement of this sort was for a free woman of color to be the housekeeper of a white planter, though in some cases free colored women operated urban businesses with white male partners. Contractual relationships involving free colored men and whites were only short-term affairs, most notably building contracts between multre carpenters and white landowners. What Rogers has found to be true for Le Cap and Port-au-Prince was also the case in Jrmie. There free coloreds formed business partnerships and did often live under the same roof with whites. Small coffee planters had similar relationships with people of color, with whom they bought and sold land. Small whites also often kept colored women as menagres (housekeepers), whom they rarely married but to whose children they often gave tacit recognition of paternity (see Chapter 4). 23 Stewart R. King, Blue Coat or Powdered Wig. 24 She found that the rate at which free coloreds took spouses of their phenotype was 80% in Le Cap and 70% in Port-au-Prince. Dominique Rogers, De lorigine du prjug de couleur en Hati, Outre-Mers 90, no. 340-341 (2003): 97-100.

PAGE 30

20 Part of the Crowns response to the rise in population in Jrmie and elsewhere in Saint-Domingue was a desire for greater official policing power to keep the thousands of new residents in line, in particular the multitudes of slaves arriving every year from Africa. Under the authority of the seneschal, the marchausse, the rural mounted police force composed primarily of free blacks, hunted for maroon slaves and kept order in the countryside. The marchausse also incorporated some slaves, whose masters received in return for this public service a dispensation from the liberty tax charged for manumissions. In Jrmie, the administrative structure of the marchausse consisted of a white officer (exempt), a colored non-commissioned officer (brigadier), and four free black rank-and-file (archers). 25 Table 2-2. Militia Enrollment by Race, 1751-1789 Year White Militia % White Libre Militia % Libre % of All Whites Serving in Militia % of All Libres Serving in Militia 1751 159 85.03 28 14.97 41.09 25.69 1765 168 67.47 81 32.53 Unknown Unknown 1789 480 59.11 332 40.89 24.00 33.20 Source: Militia enlistment cited in Moreau de Saint Mry, Description . de la partie franaise, 3: 1400. Militia enrollment also increased with the population boom, and the rising proportion of free coloreds in the militia demonstrates their rising significance both as a source of state power and as a potential threat to the social status quo. In 1751, 159 whites and 28 free coloreds served in the parish militia, the Bataillon de la Grande-Anse. Although it is not clear what role free coloreds there played in the militia of the 1750s, in the 1760s royal proclamations forbade the promotion of men of color above the rank of 25 See Chapter 3, below, for my discussion of one such supernumerary. I have decided to maintain the colonial phenotypical designations. Hence free blacks will be called ngres libres free quadroons quarterons libres, and free octoroons mtifs libres. Similarly, I will refer to the gens de couleur libres and free coloreds as equivalent terms. See Appendix A for further description of the racial hierarchy as imagined in the late eighteenth century. Ibid.; and King, Blue Coat or Powdered Wig, 234.

PAGE 31

21 sergeant. Grands blancs, meanwhile, held high rank in the parish militia. Prosperous coffee planters Ren LeRoy and Simon Ertillet Prbois both held captaincies in the battalion, while merchant Jean Chalmette commanded the artillery company. Unsurprisingly, one of the wealthies whites, sugar planter Sr. Hildevert Berquier, pre, was commandant of the battalion until his death in the early 1780s. 26 Economy Based as it was on the export of plantation staples, the Jrmien economy needed adequate shipping to carry its coffee, cotton, lumber, indigo, and cacao to larger markets. By 1788, French ship captains had found calling at Jrmie a profitable enterprise, where before 3 or 4 small ships from Europe did not find sufficient business in Jrmie to make going there profitable. In 1788, Moreau de Saint-Mry found that eleven French vessels and eight coasting vessels (caboteurs) arrived each year. These figures indicate only legal commerce, however, and do not take into account the interlopers who no doubt frequented smaller ports like Trou Bonbon and Les Camites. 27 More empirical evidence comes from official customs records of the volume of goods exported from each of Saint-Domingues twelve major ports. As Table 2-3 demonstrates, Jrmie legally exported 6.5% (4.5 million pounds) of the colonys coffee and generated 1.62% of the customs duties paid to the Crown during that year, totals that do not take into account coffee from the Grande-Anse shipped through the coasting trade 26 There was also at least one company of dragoons. Moreau de Saint-Mry, Description . de la partie franaise, 3: 1400-1401; baptismal records of Louise Adlade Bonne Robinet, Jeanne Marie Petronille LeRoy, and Franoise Kavenagh, Ecclesiastical Records, Paroisse de Saint-Louis de Jrmie, 1781, Jrmie Papers; partnership agreement between Sr. Simon Stilite Prebois and dame Marie Bouch, ibid., Notaries, L6A-3; Partnership between Dame Veuve Berquier and her children for the exploitation of a sugar plantation, Jrmie, 2 March 1785, L6A-94; and Moreau de Saint-Mry, Description . de la partie franaise, 3: 1386. 27 Moreau de Saint-Mry, Description . de la partie franaise, 3: 1383.

PAGE 32

22 to other ports or smuggled out of the quarter. When compared with the other ports in the South Province (i.e., those on the peninsulas southern coast) these percentages increase to 40.3 and 10.98%, respectively. 28 Indirect evidence also exists for a contraband trade with Anglo-America: coffee planters quite often rode English horses (perhaps from the United States) and decorated their rather humble cabins with English furniture. Their ownership of English manufactures is only part of the evidence of an important economic between Jamaica and the Grande-Anse. Jrmien planters and their counterparts throughout the South had long relied on slaves from Jamaica (and Curaao as well) to stock their plantation workforces 29 Table 2-3. Summary of Property Ownership in Saint-Domingue, Listed by Major Ports of Embarkation, 1788 Port Sugar Plantations Coffee Plantations Cotton Plantations Indigo Plantations Tanneries Rum Distilleries Cacao Plantations Lime Kilns Slaves CFF ap ranais 168 1263 14 27 3 28 7 51 98,537 ort-Dauphin 120 345 3 49 0 13 0 7 31,467 Port-de-Paix 8 249 23 384 0 4 18 26 28,251 N ORTH TOTAL 296 1857 40 460 3 45 25 84 158,255 28 Franois Barb-Marbois, tat des finances de Saint-Domingue (Paris, 1790). 29 These references are taken from a score of plantation inventories contained in the Jrmie Papers. Of the three horses Sr. Louis Paret left upon his death, the appraisers of his estate described one as crole the second as anglais (English), and the third as anglais batard, perhaps meaning one of mixed English and creole parentage. Paret also owned two saddles: an old one of English make and the second a servants saddle (selle valet). Succession of Sr. Louis Paret, 2 March 1786, G5-102. Charles Frostin suggests that this tie amounted to Anglophilia in the latter half of the eighteenth century, encouraging separatist Domingois planters to look to Jamaica for aid with the outbreak of the Revolution in the early 1790s. Frostin, Les rvoltes blanches Saint-Domingue aux XVIIe et XVIIIe sicles (Paris: Lcole, 1975), Chapter 6. In 1784, the Crown offered French slavers a bounty of 100 livres for each slave disembarked in the South, an encouragement doubled in 1786. Jrmie was excluded from this inducement, which was restricted to the only the southern coast of the peninsula, which may have encouraged foreign slavers to continue to go to the Grande-Anse. Moreau de Saint-Mry, Description . de la partie franaise, 3: 1166.

PAGE 33

23 Table 2.3 Continued PPSWEST ort-au-rince 190 240 65 385 0 43 3 48 65,303 aint-Marc 43 298 315 1184 0 10 1 71 50,216 Logane 66 58 18 78 0 25 1 14 12,896 Petit-Gove 44 63 32 216 0 18 3 18 29,058 TOTAL 343 659 430 1863 0 96 8 151 157,473 JCTSOUTH rmie 8 105 30 44 0 6 25 14 18,774 ap-iburon 2 24 12 169 0 0 4 7 7,153 Les Cayes 110 69 76 175 0 18 2 32 27,937 Saint-Louis 32 39 28 257 0 8 2 18 16,785 Jacmel 1 57 89 129 0 0 3 7 19,151 TOTAL 153 294 235 774 0 32 36 78 89,800 TOTALS 792 2810 705 3097 3 173 69 313 405,528 % In Jrmie 1.01 3.73 4.25 1.42 0.00 3.46 36.23 4.47 4.62 Source: Franois Barb-Marbois, tat des finances de Saint-Domingue (Paris: 1790). Though based largely on the cultivation of coffee, the economy of the Grande-Anse in the 1780s also encompassed other kinds of agricultural enterprises. Its eight sucreries, established on the small plains near the town of Jrmie, exported a total of 19,000 pounds of semi-refined sugar, or sucre terr, and 476,000 pounds of raw sugar in 1788, while its 30 cotonneries sent 189,000 pounds of cotton to market during the same period. Indigo was of less importance: 44 indigoteries exported a little over a thousand pounds of the blue dye in those years, though it is necessary to note that indigos value per unit weight greatly exceeded that of other cash crops. Finally, though the customs records for 1788 does not even list cacao as an export category, 25 cacaotires continued to operate (Table 2-3). Plantation inventories from the 1780s suggest that many coffee plantations possessed small groves of cacao trees. At least some of their produce went to local consumption: Moreau de Saint-Mry indicates that shortages during the Seven Years

PAGE 34

24 War encouraged Jrmiens to replace imported butter with beurre de cacao, which played an important part in local foodways thereafter. He also notes that the parish of Jrmie and that of Cap Dame Marie respectively produced 60,000 and 120,000 pounds of cacao in 1788. A final category unmentioned in the customs records is lumber. Moreau de Saint-Mry indicates that Jrmiens produced a half million pounds of lumber each year, apparently for both export abroad and through the coasting trade to other ports in the colony as well as for local use (Table 2-5). 30 Table 2-4. Export Statistics, 1788 Region White\ Clayed Sugar Raw Sugar Coffee Cotton Indigo Total Weight Customs Duties TOTAL:NORTH 52,968 4,085 33,811 68 264 91,196 2,845 TOTAL:WEST 12,746 69,184 23,286 4,616 545 110,377 3,043 TOTAL: SOUTH 4,507 19,901 11,048 1,598 1,190 39,279 1,029 TOTAL: COLONY 70,221 93,170 68,145 6,282 1,999 240,852 6,917 Jrmie 19 476 4,453 189 1 6,212 113 % Jrmie 0.03 0.51 6.53 0.03 1.62 2.58 1.63 Source: tat general des Cultures & Manufactures de . Saint-Domingue, 1788-1789 in Franois Barb-Marbois, tat des finances de Saint-Domingue (Paris, 1790). Exports are expressed in thousands of pounds, while customs duties are per 1,000 livres colonials. In addition to producing coffee, cotton, sugar, and indigo for the export market, Jrmiens also engaged in industrial enterprises whose products were doubtless for local consumption. According to the 1788 tat des finances de Saint-Domingue produced by the intendants office in Port-au-Prince (see Table 2-3), the Grande-Anse contained six guildiveries (rum distilleries) but legally exported no tafia (low-grade cane liquor). The 30 On the local use of cacao to substitute butter, see Moreau de Saint-Mry, Description . de la partie franaise, 3: 1406. On the 1730s expansion and demise of cacao in the Grande-Anse, see ibid., 3: 1377.

PAGE 35

25 production of 14 lime ovens (fours chaux) likewise contributed to the local market as necessary building materials necessary to the growing towns and plantations. 31 Table 2-5. Annual Commodity Production in the Grande-Anse, 1788 (Thousands of Pounds) Clayed Sugar Raw Sugar Coffee Cotton Indigo Cacao Lumber 19 476 4,453 189 1 180 500 Sources: Customs records, 1788-1789; and Moreau de Saint-Mry, Description . de la partie franaise, 3: 1400. N.B.: Figures are given in units of 1,000. Quantities refer to production in both parishes of the Grande-Anse. Perhaps the most studied branch of commerce is the Atlantic slave trade. In their database on the Atlantic slave trade, David Eltis, Stephen D. Behrendt, David Richardson, and Herbert S. Klein include a handful of French slaving voyages whose major port of disembarkation was Jrmie (see Table 2-6). 32 All of these voyages date, however, between 1788 and 1791, a sign of the ports growing attraction to French merchants, long after the boom in the Jrmien slave population had begun. Transshipments within the colony and the contraband slave trade with the English through Jamaica no doubt brought most of the slaves before the late 1780s. In all five cases in the database, the slaving vessels unloaded most of their slaves at Jrmie. 33 31 Franois Barb-Marbois, tat des finances de Saint-Domingue (Paris, 1790). 32 The only case of coastal slave trading that I have discovered in the notarial archive involved a Sieur Lacluse of Cap Franais, the colonys major entrept, who consigned two slaves, both of the Congo nation, to sieur Antoine Belisoli, a caboteur whom he directed to sell in Jrmie. Power of attorney from Sieur Lacluse to Sr. Antoine Belisoli, 4 June 1788, M1-48, Jrmie Papers. 33 David Eltis, Stephen D. Behrendt, David Richardson, and Herbert S. Klein, eds., The Trans-Atlantic Slave Trade: A Database on CD-ROM (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999).

PAGE 36

26 Table 2-6. Sample of Slaving Vessels Calling at Jrmie, 1788-1791 Year N ame of Vessel Port of Departure Primary African Port 1 st Port of Disembarkation Primary Port of Disembarkation N umber of Slaves D i s e m b a r k e d 1788 Trois Frres Nantes Angola Cap Franais Jrmie 128 1789 Emilie Nantes Angola Cap Franais Jrmie 254 1791 Nouvel Amour Nantes Calabar Port-au-Prince Jrmie 339 1791 Vrais Amis Honfleur Gabon Jrmie Jrmie 157 1791 Deux Fanies Saint-Malo Kormantine Jrmie Jrmie 107 Source: David Eltis, Stephen D. Behrendt, David Richardson, and Herbert S. Klein, eds., The Trans-Atlantic Slave Trade: A Database on CD-ROM (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999). Whether their human cargo was legal or not, it seems slave ship captains used local merchants as their agents to distribute newly arrived slaves, or bossales, to local customers. If the notarial documents are any indication, Sr. Pierre Toiry was the foremost local slave dealer. He apparently did quite well in the market for human bodies: he owned at least one house on Rue Basse de la Marine in Jrmie, a plantation at La Grande Rivire, and a half share in a plantation at Rivire Froide. He ran out of luck in 1787, when he declared that he owned over 40,000 livres to Jean and Hugues McLean, merchants based in Kingston, Jamaica. Toiry had a series of notarial acts passed in quick succession in an effort to free up enough capital to keep his solvency. The officials of the snchausse treated Toirys debt to the McLeans as nothing out of the ordinary, suggesting that the contraband slave trade with Jamaica received the tacit approval of the local government. 34 34 Though it would appear that commercial connections between Jrmie and Kingston would have been

PAGE 37

27 Bossales, slaves recently arrived in the colony from Africa, acted as an important means of exchange in the local economy. Notarized sales of land reveal how key bossales are to understanding how small proprietors accumulated capital. Although the sellers of small parcels of land sometimes demanded payment in money of Spain or Portugal current in the colony and quite often accepted bills of exchange, some demanded that buyers give them bossales for land. In September 1786, Antoine Alger, ngre libre, promised to sell a habitation at les Roseaux to Sr. Pierre Malvin de Buns, habitant at Fond Rouges, in barter for two bossales from Sr. Pierre Toiry. In such transactions, Toiry was the only slave trader ever mentioned. The sources do not allow us to say whether he was the only slave merchant in Jrmie, but perhaps he was the one best known to habitants in the outlying cantons. 35 Some evidence also exists for an internal economy in the Grande-Anse. Small farmers living on the margins of the export economy sold their produce to the towns. Planters also bought their plantains and manioc to supplement the food already grown by the slaves themselves on common plots. Small proprietorsfree coloreds who had not sold their land to white planting interestsappear to have supplied many of the nutritional needs of the new coffee economy. 36 In the 1770s and 1780s, as immigrants arrived from western and southern France, Martinique, and other parts of Saint-Domingue, the wealthier searching for land and the considered contraband trade, the local administrators did not find it odd, and the royal attorney in Jrmie made it clear that Toiry would be required to pay his debts. The whole matter has a feeling of business as usual. For Toirys insolvency, see documents in Lpines papers for June 1787, especially Recognizance of debt by Sr. Pierre Toiry to the M.cLeans of Kingston, 16 June 1787, L6B-97. 35 See, for example, the sale of land in L6B-38, JP-N. 36 Gabriel Debien, Les esclaves aux Antilles franaises au XVIIe-XVIIIe sicles (Basse-Terre: Socit dHistoire de la Guadeloupe, 1974), Chapter 11.

PAGE 38

28 poor for employment (see Table 2-7), the governor and intendant in Port-au-Prince granted unconceded land along the quartiers waterways to both newcomers and old settlers. Although royal land regulations mandated that grantees hold and improve their concessions for at least five years, many sold their new land well before that time. 37 Table 2-7. Immigrants to the Grande-Anse, 1780-1789 38 Year 39 Name Phenotype/Legal Place of Birth Country 40 Occupation 1781 Catherine Barbo White creole? Martinique Fr. Antilles 1781 Ursule Valle European Anjou France 1781 Barthelemi Martel European Bordeaux France Habitant 1781 Dominique Bouny European Bordeaux France 1781 Mathurin Vincent Renaud European Bretagne France Master saddler 1781 Jean Narbonne European Gascony France Master surgeon 1781 Jean Mathieu Videt de Nartigues European Languedoc France Habitant 1781 Mathieu Bourbon European Limoges France Storekeeper 1781 Jean Baptiste Perret European Lyons France Town jailer 37 In one case, an informant instigated an investigation by the royal attorney against merchant Claude Asti for not developing a concession of land at Nouvelle Plymouth. See JP-N 2-52 for documentation of this case. 38 I have excluded military personnel and prisoners of war who were in Jrmie during the U.S. War for Independence as temporary residents. 39 Year indicates the earliest year known, from documents in the Jrmie Papers. 40 P. du Sud, P. du Nord, and Partie de lOuest are equivalent to the South, North, and West Provinces, respectively.

PAGE 39

29 Table 2-7 Continued 1781 Pierre Bruet Moche European Savoy Italy Habitant 1781 Jean Magloire Carbasio Multre affranchi Fort Dauphin Saint-Domingue Cavalier 1781 Marie Rose Boncy Multresse ingnue Port-de-Paix Saint-Domingue 1781 Marie Thrse Longchant Ingnu Cavaillon Saint-Domingue 1781 Rose Elizabeth Martel de Belle Roche White creole? LAnse Veau Saint-Domingue 1782 Claude Franois Ade Ngre affranchi Martinique Fr. Antilles Archer de police 1782 Marie Magdeleine LeBeau European LaRochelle France 1782 Etienne Tessier Ingnu LAnse Veau Saint-Domingue Smallholder/mail carrier 1786 Jean Baptiste . Bazile dit Estienne Multre libre Logane Saint-Domingue Habitant 1786 Genevive Lezeau White Creole Aquin Saint-Domingue Habitante 1787 Joseph Franois Vezier des Ombrages European Poitou France Interim major-commandant 1788 Elie Louis Fournier European Angoumois France Notary 1788 Paul dit Guinney Multre libre Quartier Morin Saint-Domingue Tailor 1789 Pierre Augustin Rose de la Rue European Poitou France Merchant in Jrmie Source: Jrmie Papers, Notaries Thomas, Lpine, and Girard; and ibid., Greffe, Ecclesiastical Records, 1781.

PAGE 40

30 Moreau de Saint-Mry notes in his Description . de la partie franaise that free coloreds owned most of the land in the Grande-Anse prior to the coffee boom but sold out to whites once land prices rose. 41 Notarial documents I have consulted do suggest that free coloreds were selling their land to free up capital they needed for other pursuits or because of poor luck as coffee planters, but they do not indicate as strong a transferal of land from free coloreds to whites as Moreau suggests. As he explained in his marriage contract, Franois Lafort, a freeborn mtif, lost his parents plantation and moved to town, where he did not do much better. 42 Other free coloreds needed the capital they could get from selling their land. Sr. Jean Antoine Duleun de St. Brosse bought fifty carreaux of land at les Roseaux from ingnu Etienne Tessier for 5000 livres in July 1782. The record of the sale indicates that Tessier, who acquired the land in 1771, had been cultivating 1000 banana trees, a scale of cultivation that implies he sold their yield for public consumption. After selling his land, Tessier became the mail courier between Jrmie and LAnse Veau. It appears his reason for selling his plantain farm was to manumit his female griffe slave Anne the following year, for whose liberty he paid a 1,000 livres tax to the Crown. 43 41 As used in the Grande-Anse at the end of the eighteenth century, habitant (feminine habitante) denoted anyone who owned rural property, no matter his or her phenotype or economic status. I have not been able to establish deeper meanings to the term, but I would be interested to know how this signifier interacted with the new language of citizenship during the periods in which the French Republic controlled the region (1789-1791, 1794-1803). Moreau de Saint-Mry, Description . de la partie franaise, 3: 1400-1401. 42 The phenotypical designation mtif (also mestif) denoted someone of one-eighth African ancestry, usually with straight hair and fair skin. Moreau also makes racist comments on the infertility of the mtif and his physical inferiority relative to whites. Moreau de Saint-Mry, Description . de la partie franaise, 1: 92. Lafort does not indicate why he lost his familys plantation, but his fiances refusal to give him control over her property suggests that he was not to be trusted with money. Marriage contract between Franois Lafort and Marie Claire Belune, 2 September 1789, M1-63, JP-N. I discuss their case in more detail in Chapter 3, below. 43 Ingnu is a term applied to freeborn people of color. Griffe indicated someone with one black parent and one mulatto parent. Sale of land, 6 July 1782, L6A-33AB, JP-N; and Manumission of Anne Roxlane, grif

PAGE 41

31 Although some free coloreds did quite well as coffee planters or even producers of food crops, notarial documents indicate that free coloreds also filled many of the same economic roles as poor white immigrants: plantation managers, artisans in the building trades, and as secondary and primary traders. They competed with white immigrants for skilled and semi-skilled jobs such as these and no doubt with slaves for more menial labor. Some prospered as shop owners and occasionally, it seems, as master craftsmen. It is impossible to say exactly how many individuals were employed in one trade or another, but the notarial documents give the impression that many carpenters, both white and multre, found employment in the booming local economy. 44 Taking advantage of the boom in construction, S. Bernard Fourcand, a former ships carpenter who immigrated from Canada, established himself as a building contractor: after sealing contracts with clients in Jrmie and the outlying cantons, Fourcand contracted a team of multre carpenters to frame and plank planters residences, slave cabins, and outbuildings on plantations, as well as to make improvements on pre-existing structures. For just such a job, Fourcand made a contract with the multres ingnus Louis Tripoly and Jean Jacques Boncy to put planking on the inside of the house of the ngresse libre (free black) Martonne in Jrmie, as well as construct jalousies and stairs to the second story. Working through a contractor like [sic], by le nomm Etienne Tessier, 1783, L6A-56, ibid. 44 Carpenter Joseph Millery made a direct contract to build the structures necessary for a new plantation. He mentioned his own apprentices. The exact structure of skilled labor in Jrmie is not clear, but many free colored and white immigrants appearing in the notarial archive were carpenters, along with a few bakers, tailors, shoemakers, and coopers. For Millerys contract, see M1-97, JP-N.

PAGE 42

32 Fourcand, free colored artisans could perhaps compete against both their white and free colored counterparts who sought out work alone. 45 Planters and Plantations As Michel-Rolph Trouillot has indicated, many first-generation coffee planters in Saint-Domingue depended on the sugar complex for their fortunes and invested some of their wealth in coffee. They withdrew when prices fell in the mid-1770s. The second generation of coffee planters were in Trouillots analysis poor whites and free coloreds who already owned land in the mountains and who converted some of that land to coffee. Most of the coffee planters who appear in the notarial papers from the 1780s and early 1790s that I have consulted were immigrant whites. Many of those who were free coloreds derived their property from their white fathers, as were the case of the Lafonds and Azors of Fond dIcaque and the Bouchereau family of La Grande-Rivire. Free colored coffee planters appear to have seldom requested the services of notaries to have real estate property appraised for sale. Their lack of presence in the notarial records may derive from a desire to avoid selling land or to do so without going through official channels. Some of the factors discouraging free colored ownership of coffee plantations were demographic (there were twice as many whites as free coloreds in Jrmie) and the problem of capital accumulation. 46 45 For the contract on Martonnes house in Jrmie, see Building contract, 27 November 1787, M1-32, JP-N. For other contracts between Fourcand and multre carpenters, see L6B-107 (21 June 1787). 46 The mechanisms by which petits blancs and free coloreds could receive credit are poorly understood. I have found no successions of free colored planters from the 1780s, though some surely exist. On free colored coffee planters, see Trouillot, Motion in the System, 350; Testament of Marguerite Rozaire, 24 March 1783, L6A-52; and Moreau de Saint-Mry, Description . de la partie franaise, 3: 1390-91.

PAGE 43

33 Table 2-8. Slave and Landholding on 13 Coffee and Mixed-Crop Plantations in the Grande-Anse, 1780-1792 Name of Plantation 47 1000 Coffee 1000 Cacao 1000 Cotton N o. of Slaves Value (livres colonials) Land (Carreaux) % Land Cleared of Forest (carreaux) Bouch 10 0 10 38,740 76.5 Marcorelle 20 0 0 10 32,000 * Vigneau * 0 12 32,874 32 Fignoux * 13 54,600 32 Fondelin 12 * 13 110,000 100 12.00 De La Rue 29 0 0 14 95,400 86 10.46 Belle Vue 25 0 0 16 63,000 63 SMALL Lelevain 20 0 0 16 65,026 * Paret 11 10 0 27 103,200 75 60.00 Dangluze 12 1.2 0 32 118,410 66 63.63 Pigal 0 0 32 180,241 50 60.00 Dufour frres 70 0 12 38 160,283 83 MEDIUM Canonge & Dulaud 70 0 0 47 280,000 * TOTALS 279 11.2 12 280 1,333,774 663.5 24.26 Inventories of 13 coffee estates from the Grande-Anse suggest that small and middling planters had different relations to their landholdings (Table 2-8). As postmortem inventories of their estates suggest, many small planters slaves, land, and buildings amounted to all of their worldly possessions. In this they differed from middling planters, who owned between 25 and 50 slaves. Middling planters often had prospects other than their plantations. The two partnerships included in the sample (Dufour, frres, and Canonge & Dulaud) were arranged so that one partner managed the plantation while the other resided in one of the colonys major ports. Others invested heavily in their one landholding. Finally, some small and middling planters used coffee production to insure an income that added to their primary occupations. Dominique Barnab Lelevain was a master surgeon who enjoyed revenues from both medical fees 47 The inventories of large plantations tended not to include descriptions of land use. I have therefore excluded estates of that class from consideration in this section.

PAGE 44

34 and the coffee his 16 slaves produced. Similarly, Marie Thrze Sauvanelle, who bought the Fondelin plantation in 1787 jointly with her brother and sisters, operated a small store in La Haute-Ville. Finally, some small and middling coffee planters were absentees who lived in Jrmie and left the administration of their rural properties to managers or business partners. 48 The higher capital outlay of middling planters not only paid for more slaves but also more advanced technology. After the slaves picked the cherries (ripe fruit) from the coffee bushes, at the very least it was necessary to dry them before sending them to market. At the least, planters could dry the cherries directly on the ground, but drying them on platforms made of masonry produced a superior product. Once the cherries were dry, a process that could take up to two weeks, teams of slaves took turns removing their outer coating with grinding mills. Some planters also employed winnowing mills thereafter to separate the coffee beans from refuse. Finally, the entire workforce sorted the beans into grades by quality and put them into sacks. Although it is true that becoming a coffee planter required far less capital than to become a sugar planter, the notarial records suggest that to produce coffee well required the outlay of a hundred thousand livres colonials or more in order to prosper at it. 49 Middling planters like Sr. Jean-Baptiste Dangluze might have owned a house in Jrmie or one of the bourgs and have family connections with captains of coasting 48 Succession of Sieur Lelevain, Trou Bonbon, 7 February 1784, L6A-66, JP-N; and 14 July 1790, M1-95, ibid. 49 Jrmien coffee planters whose estates were inventoried in the 1780s did not own many books, least of all manuals on coffee planting. Pierre-Joseph Labories The Coffee Planter of San Domingo gives us a retrospective view of how one successful coffee planter in the North practiced his trade. Pierre-Joseph Laborie, The Coffee Planter of San Domingo (London: T. Cadell and W. Davies, 1798).

PAGE 45

35 vessels, but they remained a step below large planters whose families owned land in more than one parish. The Clments, for example, were import-export merchants based at Cap Franais and among the many northerners who had invested in Grande-Anse real estate. The best example of Jrmien proprietors invested in both sugar and coffee exploitation, however, is the Berquier family. Their sugar plantation located immediately east of La Basse-Ville, greatly impressed Moreau de Saint-Mry. Compared to the crude machinery employed by most local coffee planters, La Habitation Berquier was an engineering marvel. The wheel of the sugar mill was powered by water drawn from its reservoir of four carreaux supplied from many sources; when this supply was not enough, a windmill drew more water up from La Grande-Rivire de la Grande-Anse. Following the death of the family patriarch, Sr. Hildevert Berquier, pre, his widow and children formed a partnership to run the sucrerie for five years. Ltat dtaill des liquidations, the official report of the French Ministry of Finances indemnifications to Domingois property owners in the mid-nineteenth century, indicates the variety of properties owned by the Berquiers at the time of Haitian independence (see Table 2-9). From the nineteenth-century indemnity data it is clear that various members of the family invested in a variety of export crops: coffee, indigo, cotton. The bulk of the familys wealth, however, came from sugar and coffee cultivation, and like many families that can be described as members of a planter elite, the Berquiers had property in more than one quarter, in this case Petit-Trou de Nippes. 50 50 Sr. Franois Berquier, one of eldest sons, was to manage the property put into partnership, but his mother, who was to live on her own property in the parish of Nippes, east of the Grande-Anse, reserved control over the purse strings for herself. Moreau de Saint-Mry, Description . de la partie franaise, 3: 1386; and Partnership to Exploit a Sugar Plantation between Widow Berquier and her children, Jrmie, 2 March 1785.

PAGE 46

36 Table 2-9. Real property Owned by the Berquier Family, ca. 1803, for which the Family Received Compensation Proprietor Type of property Canton Parish Value (francs) Marie-Madeleine Berquier Coffee plantation La Voldrogue Jrmie 20,900.00 Coffee plantation Fond Cochon Jrmie 103,475.32 Fleury Berquier Cotton plantation Jrmie Jrmie Indigo plantation Nippes Petit-Trou 132,069.62 Woodland Les Baradres Petit-Trou Id. Sugar plantation Jrmie Jrmie Id. TOTAL 256,444.94 Source: Ltat des liquidations, 2: 410-411. N.B. that the indigo plantation, sugar plantation, and woodland owned by the children and grandchildren of Hildevert Berquier, pre, in the 1830s amounted to 132,069.62 francs in indemnities as part of one claim. Individual amounts were not provided for each property. Many writers, both contemporary and modern, have pointed out the detrimental effects of absenteeism on the slaves quality of life. Debien and Frostin both provide vignettes of managers of absentee plantations who robbed their employers in order to enrich themselves, and slaves on these plantations suffered from a lack of food and other rations. Pierre-Joseph Laborie, who wrote a manual on coffee cultivation during the late 1790s, suggests that coffee planters who lived on their estates were indeed paternalistic, given the closeness and care the proximity of master and slave afforded. No doubt slaves benefited from the closer management of their masters: the inventory of only six of the fourteen small and middling plantations listed a slave driver, implying that either the planter, or a member of his family, oversaw the daily work of the slaves. Paternalism is a tempting jump to make in this case, but further evidence from planters correspondence and personal papers would be needed to draw this conclusion. 51 51 Frostin, Les rvoltes blanches, Chapter 6; Debien, Les esclaves, Chapter 11; Trouillot, Motion in the System, 380; and Laborie, San Domingo Coffee Planter.

PAGE 47

37 Conclusions The Grande-Anse on the eve of the French Revolution was a locus of coffee production for export to French ports and from there to the supply the rest of the world-system. At the same time, Jrmie experienced migration from Frances Atlantic ports (particularly Bordeaux) and the French West Indies during the last quarter of the eighteenth century. While newcomers with capital or credit enough to do so established themselves as coffee planters and import-export merchants, the poor filled roles as artisans, plantation managers, and petty traders, roles for which they competed with people of color. Those who did acquire land often lacked the means to exploit their resources fully. Turning from the growing free population, the next chapter examines a sample of the African slaves imported into the Grande-Anse during the last half of the eighteenth century.

PAGE 48

CHAPTER 3 PLANTATION SLAVERY IN THE GRANDE-ANSE The written records available on slavery in the Grande-Anse in the 1780s tell us different things about slaves than they do about the free population. Whereas they provide some room to interpret the thoughts and actions of the variegated members of the free population, notarial documents present slaves as merchandise, in lists of names, ethnicities, ages, and personal characteristics like occupational skills and physical deformities. At the same time, the commoditization of this stratum of the human population does present some advantages, the greatest of which is a set of qualities that can be analyzed using quantitative methods. This chapter will do just that. Because of the nature of the sources, it is largely an analysis of the physical conditions of slavery: housing, diet, and family structure. 1 1 The plantation inventories that are sources for my analysis in this chapter come exclusively from the Jrmie Papers. These sources, all from the notary series of that collection, are: Succession of Sr. Joseph Vigneau, Trou Bonbon, 7 January 1782, L6A-26; Sale of Habitation by the widow Fignoux, La Grande-Rivire, 9 January 1783, L6A-44; Inventory of La Grande Habitation and La Ravine Blanche, La Grande-Rivire, 21 May 1783, L6A-60; sale of Belle Vue, La Voldrogue, 17 March 1783, L6A-45; Succession of Sieur Lelevain, Trou Bonbon, 7 February 1784, L6A-66; Sale of Habitation by Sr. Marcorelle to Sr. Descoufler, Trou Bonbon, 17 December 1784, L6A-88; Succession of Sieur Dangluze, 4 August 1785, G5-100; Partnership between Srs. Canonge & Dulaud, Trou Bonbon & LAnse du Clerc, 2 August 1785, L6A-131; Succession of Sr. Louis Paret, Les hauteurs de la Grande-Rivire, 2 March 1786; Sale of Habitation by Sieur Bouch, Les Roseaux, 16 May 1787, G5-118; Sale of Habitation by Sr. Joseph Fondelin, La Guinaude, M1-15; Dissolution of Partnership Dufour, frres, Ravine du Mitan, 11 December 1789, M1-65; Marriage Contract of Sieur de la Rue and Demoiselle Doucet, n.p., 21 April 1789, M1-55; Succession of Sr. Pigal, La Guinaude, 21 April 1789, G5-127; Succession of Sieur Payas, n.p., 5 July 1792, M1-122; Inventory of Habitation of Sr. Jean Baptiste Clment, Plymouth, 2 October 1792, L3-30; and Inventory of Habitation of Sr. Jean Joseph Clment, Plymouth, 1792. N.B.: The citations for the last two plantation inventories, those belonging to the Clment family, were unclear in the copies that I used from the personal collection of David P. Geggus. According to the Jrmie Papers finding aid, there are three inventories of Clment plantations done in the early 1790s among the papers of the notary Dobignies in that collection. 38

PAGE 49

39 -60.00-40.00-20.000.0020.0040.0060.000-410-1420-2940-4960-69Age CohortsPercentage of WholeFEMALESMALES Figure 3-1. Population Pyramid of the Workforces on Eighteen Coffee and Mixed-Crop Plantations in the Grande-Anse, 1782-1792 (N=551) To begin with, it is necessary to establish who the slaves were, as far as the sources allow. The most basic division in plantation workforces was between male and female. By determining the sex ratios of the workforces on different plantations in aggregate, some basic parameters to slave life can be established. A sample of 606 slaves working on eighteen coffee and mixed-crop plantations in the Grande-Anse had a sex ratio of 122 (i.e., 122 males for every 100 females). The actual ratios of males to females on different plantations varied widely, but a sex ratio of 122 for the slaves in my sample suggests that male slaves on coffee plantations found it difficult to find a partner. This sex ratio of 122 is similar to that which David P. Geggus calculated for coffee slaves throughout Saint-Domingue in the late eighteenth century. In his sample of 3,719 slaves on coffee plantations in the period 1767-1792, he found the aggregate sex ratio to be 120, with a sex ratio of 138 for the South, where Jrmie was. The sex ratio for my

PAGE 50

40 sample is higher than the 8 male slaves for every 7 female slaves (a sex ratio of 114) that Moreau claims was the case in the South. 2 Table 3-1. Numbers of Africans and Creoles on Eighteen Coffee and Mixed-Crop Plantations in the Grande-Anse, 1780-1792 (N=551) Ages African Males African Females Creole Males Creole Females Total Males Total Females 0 0 23 23 23 23 5-9 1 0 34 26 35 26 10-14 27 6 19 22 46 28 15-19 27 25 14 8 41 33 20-29 53 39 5 17 58 56 30-39 55 26 5 4 60 30 40-49 24 17 7 1 31 18 50-59 9 17 0 1 9 18 60-69 5 3 0 1 5 4 70+ 4 1 1 1 5 2 My sample of 218 locally born creole slaves shows a considerably greater balance between the sexes, 98 men per 100 women, which is very close to Gegguss sample. The great majority of Jrmien creoles in the 1780s were children. They monopolized the 0-4 years cohort and strongly dominated that of 5-9 years (Figure 3.1 and Table 3.2). Adolescents between the ages of 10 and 14 were a mixture of Africans and creoles, but beyond this age bracket, Africans clearly dominated. 3 These rough details about the Grande-Anses slave population in the 1780s suggest enormous changes in rural society concomitant with the coffee boom. According to official counts, the parish of Jrmie had almost 15,000 more slaves in 1788 than in 2 David P. Geggus, Sugar and Coffee Cultivation in Saint Domingue and the Shaping of the Slave Labor Force, in Ira Berlin and Philip D. Morgan, eds., Cultivation and Culture: Labor and the Shaping of Slave Life in the Americas (Charlottesville: University Presses of Virginia, 1993), 79; and Moreau de Saint-Mry, Description . de la partie franaise, 3: 1165. 3 Geggus, Sugar and Coffee,9.

PAGE 51

41 1753, an eightfold increase. Many of the plantations whose inventories were sampled were small units of production, the mean workforce size being but 30, quite a bit less than Gegguss average of 45 slaves for his sample of 87 cafteries for roughly the same period (1780-1789). His range also differed by a greater margin than mine: 7 to 304 against my 10 to 90. My sample had a median of 26 slaves. These small, young, and heavily African workforces are consistent with the regions recent development. However, even in this part of the colony most dominated by Africans, locally born creoles made up more than one-third of the slave population. This reinforces the impression given by Gegguss work that the general assumption, dating from Moreau de Saint-Mry, that two-thirds of Saint-Domingues slaves were Africans is substantially in error. Table 3-2. Summary of the Origins of Slaves on Coffee and Mixed-Crop Plantations in the GrandAnse (N=606) Place of Origin N %N Males Females Sex Ratio All Creoles 218 35.97 105 108 98 All Foreign Creoles 8 1.32 4 4 100 All Africans 371 61.22 224 160 151 Unidentified 9 1.49 5 4 125 All Slaves 606 100 338 276 122 Note: Excluded from calculations relative to sex ratio were four creole children of indeterminate sex and five creole children of unknown ages, the latter all infants. One of the key characteristics of slave life in the Americas was the inability of slave populations to replenish their numbers naturally. Only in what would become the United States did a slave population increase their numbers through self-reproduction. In the rest of the hemisphere, slave societies had to import new Africans to keep up the number of enslaved workers. Determining how well the slaves in any region grew through natural reproduction presents certain difficulties. David Geggus cautions that calculating slave fertility is quite hazardous because the births and deaths of slave

PAGE 52

42 infants often went unrecorded. The best measure of slave fertility is fertility ratio (slave children 0-4 years old per 1000 slave women 15-44 years old). 4 Table 3-3. Some Factors Bearing on Slave Life on Eighteen Coffee and Mixed-Crop Plantations, 1780-1792, Based on Notarized Plantation Inventories Name of Plantation N Sex Ratio Fertility Ratio Bouch 10 100 500 Marcorelle 10 233 500 Vignault 12 125 500 Fignoux 13 63 333 Fondelin 13 167 167 De La Rue 14 180 500 Belle Vue 16 100 0 SMALL Lelevain 16 100 200 TOTAL: SMALL 104 114 Payas 24 118 833 Paret 27 170 250 Dangluze 32 94 0 Pigal 32 244 167 Dufour frres 38 131 250 MEDIUM Canonge & Dulaud 47 156 900 TOTAL: MEDIUM 200 143 La Ravine Blanche 68 85 384 Jean Baptiste Clment 69 229 263 La Grande Habitation 76 94 333 LARGE Jean Joseph Clment 90 134 286 TOTAL: LARGE 303 124 TOTAL: ALL 607 128 354 Crop type appears to have been the biggest determinant in the fertility of slave women. Gegguss sample of 59 sucreries (years 1755-1791) indicates a median fertility index of 281, while his sample of 56 cafteries (years 1767-1792) indicates a 4 This warning primarily concerns plantation journals, which recorded day-to-day conditions of slave life, more than plantation inventories, which described plantation life at a particular moment in time. The notarized plantation inventories I have consulted require the same degree of caution as plantation journals and necessitate the same methodology. David P. Geggus, Sugar and Coffee in Saint Domingue, in Ira Berlin and Philip D. Morgan, eds., Cultivation and Culture: Labor and the Shaping of Slave Life in the Americas, 90.

PAGE 53

43 substantially lower index, 333. My sample of 18 coffee and mixed-crop plantations in the Grande-Anse (years 1782-1792) indicates a slightly lower median fertility index (310). 5 Table 3-4. Slave Fertility Indexes on Eighteen Coffee and Mixed-Crop Plantations by Size of Plantation Workforce, 1782-1792 Size Category Mean Index Median Index N SMALL 338 417 8 MEDIUM 400 250 6 LARGE 317 310 4 All Categories 354 310 18 The size of a plantations slave workforce was also had an important influence on slave fertility. In Saint-Domingue as a whole, sugar estates tended to be large operations, while the workforce sizes of coffee plantations varied widely. Our sample suggests that medium-sized coffee estates had the highest slave fertility on average. More research is necessary to verify this hypothesis, but our sample suggests that small plantations had the highest fertility, based on the median fertility of the small plantations in our sample. The Naming of Slaves and Ethnicity Ethnic labels by which different African groups were known in Saint-Domingue derived in part from their African origins, and planter stereotypes helped to determine how whites viewed slaves of certain African nations. As David Geggus has shown, these stereotypes proved less important to coffee planters, who tended to buy whatever slaves they could and in smaller quantities than did sugar planters, who generally had better 5 Geggus suggests that On the coffee plantations the most significant factor was workforce size, which indicates that the difficulty of finding a suitable partner was more important in the mountains. Ibid., 91 and Table 2.12.

PAGE 54

44 buying power. The slaves personal names, meanwhile, both show how planters chose to name their chattel and one point of origin for free colored names. 6 Slaveholders bestowed names both on their human chattel and their livestock. Despite the notorious lack of religiosity in colonial society in the late eighteenth century, the majority of the slaves had Christian names. A minority bore names from classical European civilizations: many a plantation had its Venus and Cupidon. One is left to wonder whether such names reflected some qualities the masters perceived in their slaves. The majority of the slaves in the sample only had one name. Free coloreds generally had two. The carpenter Joseph Marlborough, for example, seems to carry the surname of the British military leader, the Duke of Marlborough, as his surname. Other free coloreds used names originating in lidiome africain or Classical names. Surnames such as Minerve, Yoyo, and Tripoly fall into this category. Some gens de couleur libres, particularly members of the planter class, did have European surnames, adopted from white progenitors or perhaps godparents. 7 Ethnicity, or to use the contemporary term, nation, is a descriptor of dubious efficacy. The ethnic labels that the planters and merchants appended to their slaves only had an approximate relation to their slaves African origin. Debien notes that this identification was based in part on country marks, ritual scarification of the face practiced throughout western Africa but apparently not in American slave societies. Some 6 Geggus, Sugar and Coffee, 84-86, 88. 7 Marlboroughs surname may reflect the Anglophilia Charles Frostin attributes to the Grande-Anse. See Frostin, Les rvoltes blanches.

PAGE 55

45 groups, however, seem to have been named for the African port from which they embarked for the Americas. 8 One ethnonym that has received much recent scholarly attention is Congo. In the minds of their owners, Congos were short people from west-central Africa. The men were not considered to have good potential as workers in sugar fields given that the women did the fieldwork in their homeland. This planter stereotype explains in part why so many Congolese found themselves on coffee estates and not on sugar plantations. 9 Table 3-5. The Origins of Slaves on Eighteen Coffee and Mixed-Crop Plantations in the Grande-Anse, 1780-1792 (N=606) Ethnicity N % of N Males Females S/ R Creole 10 218 35.97 105 108 97 Ngre 208 100 104 Multre 7 4 3 Griffe 2 1 0 Quarteron 1 0 1 Foreign Creole 8 1.32 4 4 100 Portuguese 1 0 1 Spanish 1 1 0 English 3 3 3 Senegambia 20 3.30 14 6 230 Senegalese 5 3 2 Bambara 7 7 0 8 Debien, Les esclaves, 39-40. 9 More recently, in his recently published dissertation on the Luso-Brazilian alcohol trade to West Central Africa during the era of the legal trans-Atlantic slave trade, Jos C. Curto asserts that sugar cane brandy (cachaa) provided Brazilian slave traders with a valuable commodity that could compete with English and French interlopers who offered European and Indian fabrics of higher quality. He contends that French traders pursued their illicit commerce both north and south of the Portuguese seat of power, the colonial capital of Luanda. Jos C. Curto, Enslaving Spirits: The Portuguese-Brazilian Alcohol Trade at Luanda and its Hinterland, c. 1550-1830 (Leiden: Brill, 2004): 157-58; and David P. Geggus, Sex Ratio, Age and Ethnicity in the Atlantic Slave Trade: Data from French Shipping and Plantation Records, Journal of African History 30, no. 1 (1989): 29-30. 10 Not included is a griffe child and five children of unknown age. 11 Included in the total number of creoles but not in breakdown by phenotype and sex are five children of unknown gender and age. One griffe child whose sex and age are unknown was included under the relevant subheading but not in the columns for males and females.

PAGE 56

46 Table 3-5. Continued. Mandingue 7 3 4 Fulani 1 1 0 Sierra Leone 9 1.49 8 1 800 Sosso 7 7 0 Timbo 2 1 1 Windward Coast 15 2.48 11 4 400 Canga 8 7 1 Kissi 5 4 1 Bobo 2 0 2 Gold Coast 15 2.48 8 7 114 Mine 14 8 6 Caramenty 1 0 1 Bight of Benin 63 10.39 25 38 66 Arada 20 2 18 Barba 2 1 1 Nago 19 8 11 Cotocoli 3 1 2 Thiamba 12 14 9 5 Hausa 5 4 1 Bight of Biafra 19 3.14 10 9 111 Ibo 15 8 7 Bibi 3 2 1 Moco 1 0 1 Congo 13 200 33.00 136 76 179 Congo Franc 1 1 0 Congo 183 118 65 Mondongue 16 7 9 Mozambique 12 10 2 Other Africans 14 30 4.95 11 19 58 Unidentifie d 9 1.49 5 4 125 TOTAL 606 100.00 338 276 122 The numerical preponderance of Central Africans (i.e., Congos Francs, Congos, Mondongues, and Mozambiques) among the Grande-Anses African-born slave population (200 in the sample, or 53.9%) is similar to Gegguss samples from the West 12 Also includes Quiambas and Chambas. 13 Also note that Congos represented 54% of all Africans in the sample. 14 Includes one each of Madagascar, Meyomb, Nata, Ayouba, Gourmand, Chicart, and Cadugne and three Aheressa.

PAGE 57

47 Province (1785-1791), where Central Africans made up 52.5% of the African-born contingent of slave workforces on cafteries. Congos were, however, more prevalent in the North Province (1778-1791), where they represented 68.2% of the African-born slaves. Being a majority of Africans in the Grande-Anse does not necessarily mean West Central Africans had an overriding impact on local slave culture. It would also be necessary to know what ethnic groups predominated in the Grande-Anse before the 1780s coffee boom. By analogy, the Aja-Fon of West Africa had a strong impact on Haitian vodou not because they were the most numerous slaves in late colonial Saint-Domingue but because they were apparently the most numerous during the first years of settlement. 15 Moreover, the young age at which Congos in particular disembarked in the colony worked against survivals of their cultural traditions. Twenty-two (11%) of the Congos represented in our sample were boys younger than fifteen years old. Most of the others were well below thirty years. Embarking from Africa as boys and young men, Congo slaves in the Grande-Anse would have had limited knowledge of their culture, particularly the more esoteric parts of religion and tradition. These criticisms aside, ethnicity remains a category of analysis that must be taken seriously, if nothing more than to consider how colonial society saw the slave workforce. Table 3-5 expresses how 606 slaves classified using these colonial ethnic descriptors break down. If considered with those brought from the same slave catchment areas, or coasts, the largest African population in the Grande-Anse in the 1780s was the Congos (N=200), among whom were the so-called Congos Francs (True Congos), individuals from a wide catchment area along the coast of Angola. Another group from West-Central 15 David Geggus, Haitian Voodoo in the Eighteenth Century: Language, Culture, Resistance, Jahrbuch fr Geschichte von Staat, Windschaft und Geschelschaft Weinamerikas 28 (1991): 36-37.

PAGE 58

48 Africa were the Mondongues (N=15), whom the French reputed to be cannibals. Taken together, West Central Africans had a sex ratio of 179, a high disparity between the sexes but not as extreme as that of Africans from some other regions. Africanist historian Joseph C. Miller asserts that West Central Africans elites tended to sell more men than women into the Atlantic slave trade because, he contends, they retained females for slave breeding. An alternative interpretation is that these women were retained as multiple wives in a polygamous society. 16 Slaves from the other coasts together represented only about 30 percent of the sample population, but this does not exclude the possibility that individuals from these catchment areas could find others of identical or similar background with whom to reminisce about Africa, engage in cultural practices such as religious rituals, or have children. 17 The largest ethnic group in the sample was the creoles, slaves born in the colony. They were notable for their number (N=218, or 35.97% of the sample) and their age: most were under the age of 20 years, and many of these were born after the beginning of the coffee boom. It is unclear where the other creoles came from. Some were surely part of the 2,147 slaves present in the Grande-Anse at the time of the 1755 census, but it is unknown if these creoles, like some of the free coloreds, were immigrants from other parts of the colony, whom their migrating masters brought with them or whom their masters sold through the coasting trade. 16 Debien, Les esclaves, 49-52; and Joseph C. Miller, Way of Death: Merchant Capitalism and the Angolan Slave Trade, 1730-1830 (Madison: University of Wisconsin Press, 1988), 135. 17 John Thornton, Africa and Africans in the Making of the Atlantic World, 1400-1800 (Second Edition; Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998), 199.

PAGE 59

49 The Slaves Diet Like most early modern agricultural peoples, Domingois slaves subsisted almost entirely on starches. Planters commonly grew manioc and plantains on coffee plantations in the Grande-Anse to supplement what the slaves presumably grew themselves on their own provision grounds. suggest that the local diet followed the general pattern. Gabriel Debien states in his Les esclaves aux Antilles franaises that the nature of the slave diet followed different patterns in the colonys three provinces, and Moreau related that like those in the Windward Islands, Jrmien slaves relied on plantains, yams, taro, sweet potatoes, and manioc. 18 Inventories of property only give patchy information on food production on individual plantations. Appraisers elected by parties interested in these inventories were quite inconsistent in describing land use. No official guidelines appear to have existed, and the notaries did not enforce any sort of uniformity in the estate appraisals that they recorded. The amount of land under food cultivation was either measured in the number of individual plants or in the number of carreaux dedicated to a certain species of crop. Very common in the description of provision plots worked in common was the notation quelques vivres (some food crops) which I have interpreted as a product either of official laziness or of intercropping of seed crops like beans between rows of young coffee trees. 18 See Chapter 2 for more information about these rural food producers. No scholar seems to have addressed what may have been a pre-revolutionary peasantry. Information on these habitants is made more difficult by scanty descriptions of their properties when inventoried for sale. Fernand Braudel, The Structures of Everyday Life: The Limits of the Possible (New York: Harper & Row, Publishers, 1979), 106-107; and Moreau de Saint-Mry, Description . de la partie franaise, 3: 1406.

PAGE 60

50 Providing sufficient food for the slaves had been a problem in the French Antillean colonies since the seventeenth century. A series of metropolitan and colonial laws, the most important of which was the 1685 Code noir, required the habitants to provide their chattel with a minimum ration, which in the long run effected a system of food provisioning based on the cultivation of vivres in common plots on Saturday afternoons under the supervision of the commandeur, or slave foreman. The slaves were allowed small plots around their huts known as jardins-case, or jardins-ngre. Debien argues the jardins-case provided a rare space for African autonomy within the oppressive and dehumanizing forced labor regime. At the end of the eighteenth centuries, these jardins-case were removed from the areas between the slave huts to locations closer to the sugarcane fields and coffee groves where slaves did most of their work. Each slave then received a provision ground to grow vegetables to supplement the starchy staples provided by the common plots of vivres. 19 The plantation inventories that I consulted from the Grande-Anse do not discuss slave provision grounds. Rather, the notaries recorded how much acreage was devoted to food crops and occasionally delineated how much of each crop was in the fields. 20 Aside from the carbohydrate-rich vegetable foods discussed above, slaves also took the initiative in supplementing their diet with protein from both wild and domesticated sources. In the West Province, slaves in the hinterland of Port-au-Prince sought for clutches of turtle and alligator eggs. Moreau de Saint-Mry provides us with three wild 19 Debien draws his perspective on food production first from the acts of legislative-judicial bodies like the Conseil du Roi (Royal Council) and the conseils suprieurs of Saint-Domingue, Martinique, and Guadeloupe and second from the management records of various sugar and coffee plantations, particularly in Saint-Domingue. Debien, Les esclaves, Chapter 8. 20 Ibid., 177-86, 195.

PAGE 61

51 sources of protein available to the slaves. First, in the early months of the year crabs were very numerous off the coast of Saint-Domingue to the point of overrunning the fields. Slaves in the Grande-Anse welcomed the opportunity for readily available protein. Second, the Grande-Rivire de la Grande-Anse teemed with fish in the late eighteenth century. Given that slaves fished for crabs in underwater holes, slaves living the near La Grande-Rivire added fish from the river to their diet. Finally, the coffee frontier expanded into the forested highlands where for two and a half centuries feral pigs and cattle had roamed. It is within reason that at least some slaves hunted these beasts for their subsistence, as had the buccaneers of former times, and this can be substantiated by way of analogy. 21 I propose, then, that hunting and fishing may have been subsistence activities either encouraged or allowed by Domingois planters and their managers. The fish-laden Grande-Rivire, feral pigs, and an annual surge of crabs were three opportunities for the pursuit of wild sources of protein. 22 Much disease among the slaves came from nutritional deficiencies, as Kenneth F. Kiple has demonstrated in his acclaimed work The Caribbean Slave: A Biological History. Kiples work does have some shortcomings because he does not provide detailed analysis of the French Antilles, though he summarizes the diet of French slaves as basically lacking in protein and high in carbohydrates. As Kiple argues convincingly, 21 Trouillot, Motion in the System, 372-373. 22 Trouillot points out that the sugar planters resented the expansion of coffee production into the wilds partly because it destroyed the habitats of the feral pigs. I have not found much information on hunting in late eighteenth-century Saint-Domingue. Lacking that, I will make two observations. First, the sugar plantocracy may have engaged in hunting as an analogue to the great hunts undertaken by the European nobility. Second, on more secure grounds the assertion can be made that the expansion of coffee sealed off a frontier that may have had some cultural significance for the Dominguan elite. After all, the founders of the sugar complex were successful buccaneers. The cultural significance of the frontier is a topic unresearched in the historiography of Saint-Domingue, but it reminds one of Frederick Jackson Turners Frontier Thesis in United States history, long since abandoned by Americanist historians. Ibid.

PAGE 62

52 such a diet left a population susceptible to beriberi and other nutritional deficiency diseases. He correlates symptoms of beriberi with those of mal destomach (sic), a common and fatal disease among Caribbean slave populations. Mal destomac, also called mal coeur in the French colonies and mal de estmago in the Spanish was widespread, but the slaves, their masters, and European-trained medical professionals each had their own opinions on its etiology. 23 In accordance with their own cultural context, African bondsmen, when questioned about the disease, blamed their affliction on witchcraft. In discussing vodou before the Haitian Revolution, David Geggus has asserted that slaves practicing African or Afro-Caribbean belief systems would look for supernatural causes for misfortunes. European planters, plantation managers, and surgeons, by contrast, tended to attribute the slaves lethargy and melancholy to a loss of a will to live, an insidious admission of their slaves humanity and autonomy. Kiple, however, challenges both of these contemporary views by resorting to modern medical science. The general wasting away and lethargy of slaves in the grip of mal destomac bear resemblance to a number of diseases whose etiology is known in the present day. Kiple singles out two: beriberi and hookworm infestation and argues convincingly that the former was probably the cause of mal destomac. 24 To the point, mal destomac was the single most common disease reported among the sample Jrmien slave population. Of the five cases reported in the sample, four occurred on La Grande Habitation in May 1783, but the plantation manager reported no 23 Kenneth F. Kiple and Virginia H. Kiple, Deficiency Diseases in the Caribbean, Journal of Interdisciplinary History 11, no. 2 (1980), reprinted in Hilary Beckles and Verene Shepherd, eds., Caribbean Slave Society and Economy: A Student Reader (New York: The New Press, 1991), 177-78. 24 Geggus, Haitian Voodoo, 47.

PAGE 63

53 cases among the slaves of La Ravine Blanche. Both were coffee plantations owned by Sr. Augustin Tripier, and the same manager oversaw both. The high rate of the disease appears to have been tied to the virulent hurricane of the previous September, which destroyed the grandcase (masters residence) and apparently much of the food supply as well. The manager reported that slaves on that plantation were in quite bad shape: thirteen were described simply as infirm, one was blind, three had venereal disease, and three had the skin disease known as crab yaws. In all, 25 of the 76 slaves living at La Grande Habitation complained of some sort of physical affliction. 25 Occupational Mobility on Coffee Plantations Even with the bad material conditions facing slaves in the Grande-Anse and their counterparts throughout the Caribbean basin, there was some room for advancement within the structures of plantation slavery. The most prestigious occupations available to bondsmen were available only to men. As David Geggus has demonstrated, on sugar plantations in Saint-Domingue a sizable minority of slave men became artisans, supervisors, livestock handlers, and domestic servants. Women, who came to form the majority of the field laborers on sucreries, sometimes found advancement in such onerous occupations as washerwomen and seamstresses. Female slaves, particularly older women, could also seek medical posts auxiliary to those of European physicians and surgeons. Though ridiculed and sometimes resented by their masters and other Europeans, these enslaved medical specialists no doubt earned prestige and power within their own communities. 26 25 At the time of the inventory of the estate, the manager had taken over one of the slave cabins to serve as his residence. L6A-60, JP-N. 26 Geggus, Sugar and Coffee, 84.

PAGE 64

54 In the colonys coffee plantations, by contrast, slaves had few chances for occupational advancement. Whereas slave men on sugar plantations had a chance of advancing within the building trades and as personal servants of the more superfluous sort, these routes were often denied to slaves on coffee plantations. Coffee planters tended to hire entrepreneurs de btiments to have new buildings erected and old ones extended and repaired, and only rarely did small planters keep many personal servants. Local conditions also played a role: bad roads limited the efficacy of keeping a coachman at the ready. In the Grande-Anse, a little less than half of the coffee plantations sampled lacked any elite slaves at all. Those that did generally maintained only commandeurs, or slave foremen, above the pool of field slaves. According to Debien, the commandeur was a man that the common workers were to hold in great respect and fear. That authors sources, generally absentee sugar planters, directed their plantation managers (grants) not to castigate their commandeurs publicly. Ideal commandeurs, in Debiens analysis, were to be vigorous men who knew the plantation work regimen. Knowledge of several African languages was also an advantage, the better to incorporate bossales into the plantations society. Mirroring the colonial principle of divide and rule, the planter or his grant should appoint a commandeur who was not of the same ethnicity of the majority of the workers. As in other aspects of slave life in Saint-Domingue region, crop type, and workforce size appear to have been important factors in the social structure of slave society in the Grande-Anse. From descriptions in extant plantation inventories we can catch some glimpses at least of how the commandeurs on these plantations appeared to white observers (Table 3-6) My sample of commandeurs on coffee and mixed-crop plantations

PAGE 65

55 in the Grande-Anse shows the diverse origins of slave drivers. Unlike sugar plantations, coffee plantations tended to be relatively new operations, which may go far to explain why so many Africans were appointed as slave drivers instead of creoles, who tended to be much too young and inexperienced for so much responsibility. 27 Table 3-6. Profiles of Commandeurs on Coffee and Mixed-Crop Plantations in the Grande-Anse, 1780-1792 Year Plantation Name Slaves Name Nation Age Description Monetary Price (livres coloniaux) 1784 Lelevain Prince Congo 35 Branded Lelevain 2000 1785 Dangluze Pierre Creole 35 N/A Not given 1786 Paret Lafortune Congo 25 N/A Not given 1787 Fondelin Balthazard Creole 35 N/A Not given 1789 Dufour Jean Spanish Creole 45 One hand missing 3000 1789 Pigal Francisque Thiamba 55 Scales on his eyes Not given Housing and Community The plantation, in its role as a self-sufficient unit of agricultural production, provided the slaves with lodging in addition to nutrition. According to Pre Jean-Baptiste Labat and other seventeenth-century observers, slaves built their own houses (cases ngres) in the colonies early years, and, as was the case of their masters, the slaves built their dwellings in accordance with their own aesthetics. 28 In the eighteenth century, and particularly on the sugar estates, planters began to have the slaves lodging built for them according to what the masters preferred. In this regard, Jrmien coffee planters seem to have agreed. Usually lacking slaves trained in 27 Debien, Les esclaves, 122-23. 28 In the seventeenth century Barbadian sugar planters forced both their African slaves and European indentured servants to build their own huts. See Hilary MacD. Beckles, Sugar and White Servitude: An Analysis of White Indentured Labor during the Sugar Revolution of Barbados, 1643-1655, Journal of the Barbados Museum and Historical Society 36, no. 3 (1981): 236-46.

PAGE 66

56 the building trades, habitants regularly contracted with entrepreneurs de btiments for the construction of cases ngres. A few such contracts have survived in the Jrmie Papers, most of which were with S. Bernard Fourcand, a former ships carpenter who obviously found a lucrative business during with the building boom in Jrmie and its hinterland in the 1780s. 29 Table 3-7. Slave Housing on Small and Middling Coffee and Mixed-Crop Plantations in the Grande-Anse, 1780-1789 (N=9) Plantation No. of Slaves No. of Cabins Slaves/Cabin Average Dimensions Marcorelle 10 2 5.00 Not given Vigneau 12 2 6.00 Not given Fondelin 13 4 3.25 Not given Lelevain 16 1 16.00 40 x 14 Paret 27 2 13.50 40 feet long Dangluze 32 2 16.00 Not given Pigal 32 3 10.67 Not given Dufour frres 38 12 3.16 Not given Canonge & Dulaud 47 8 5.88 30 x 15 The proportions and number of the cases built by the entrepreneurs, or rather the colored carpenters working for them, allow some room to speculate about sleeping arrangements on specific plantations. Table 3-7 presents a sample of nine small and medium-sized plantations for which data exist on slave housing. Many plantation inventories neglect slave housing altogether, which for some plantations may have meant that slaves slept wherever they could. Only in nine of the fourteen inventories sampled were slave quarters mentioned at all, and only in three of these cases did the notary note the dimensions of the structures. From the data available, it seems that small plantations 29 Personal correspondence with Andre-Luce Fourcand.

PAGE 67

57 (in this sample, 10-15 slaves) had smaller dwellings more akin to the African huts Labat and other observers describe for the late seventeenth century. It is reasonable to assume that individual families (however defined) each had a house of their own or that slaves of specific ethnicities lived together. Medium-sized plantations, however, seem to follow the trend Debien finds for eighteenth-century sugar plantations towards larger slave quarters that more closely resembled barracks. Professional carpenters built these structures, which were too uniform in dimension to have been built by unskilled slave labor. The slaves on the Canonge & Dulaud cafterie, by contrast, lived in eight buildings of uniform dimension, 30 feet long by 15 feet wide. Each occupant thus had 76.5 square feet of personal space and an average of 6 persons lived in each unit. The only other plantation list that allows for the same calculation is that for the Lelevain plantation, whose sixteen slaves lived under one roof; in this case, each slave had 35 square feet of personal space. From this small sample, it is difficult to contemplate to what degree such variables as personal space, occupants per dwelling, and sex ratio determined slave fertility. Conclusions Notarized inventories of coffee plantations in the Grande-Anse suggest that slave life there had many parallels with cafteries in other parts of Saint-Domingue. In the sample of eighteen coffee and mixed-crop plantations that I have presented here, where crop type was the only constant, workforce size appears as a major determinant of certain aspects of slave life, particularly the fertility of slave women. Many of these plantations had been established relatively recently compared to sugar plantations in the colonys plains. Their workforces were quite young and more African than most sugar estates, but

PAGE 68

58 even in these relatively new plantations, locally born creoles constituted over a third of the entire slave population.

PAGE 69

CHAPTER 4 FAMILY, RACE, AND PATRONAGE IN THE GRANDE-ANSE BEFORE THE FRENCH REVOLUTION The study of social patterns among the free population in the Grande-Anse is a topic that the notarial records open up. Given the abundant recent work on free coloreds before the Revolution, it is worthwhile to pursue the family structure and social relations of both free coloreds and petits blancs and how these relations intersected. With that objective in mind, sacramental records and marriage contracts take on much importance. A primary means of understanding Jrmien society is marriage and baptismal patterns. The analysis that follows takes into account such records from 1781, the only year falling within the parameters of this study whose ecclesiastical records have survived in their entirety in the Jrmie Papers. Given the small size of my database on this matter, I intend for the conclusions made below to be suggestive of the way Jrmien society functioned in regards to the rate of legitimacy of births, the phenotypical composition of the gens de couleur libres, and local patterns of patronage. Table 4-1. Infants Baptized in the Parish of Jrmie, 1781 Year N Legitimacy 1 Blanc Multre Quarteron Tierceron Mtif Sang Ml 2 1781 47 68% 15 7 7 3 1 2 Source: Ecclesiastical Records, 1781, Jrmie, JP-G. 1 I have calculated legitimacy based on the formula: number of children baptized with known father divided by those baptized without a known or recognized father. 2 Here I have abbreviated for sang-ml. Literally meaning mixed blood, this descriptor was applied to those individuals who were deemed to have some detectable trace of non-European ancestry. 59

PAGE 70

60 The first factor to consider is the ratio of white to non-white participants in baptism. In 1781, the curate of the church in Jrmie baptized twenty children of color, fifteen white children, and twelve children of unknown phenotype, for a total of forty-seven. In aggregate, their parents reflected the diverse phenotypical composition pervasive throughout Saint-Domingue and other slave societies in the Greater Caribbean. As is the case with slave families, understanding the structure of free families is an undertaking complicated by problems of paternity. The rate of illegitimacy (32%) compounds these difficulties. In aggregate, eighteen individual white fathers came before the priest with thirteen white mothers. To explain this discrepancy, it is necessary to state that the five discrepant cases involved poor ecclesiastical reporting. In some cases some whites who lacked any standing in the community were given no designation, as was the British prisoner-of-war, Andr (Andrew) Cavanagh, when he and his wife presented their newborn daughter for baptism. Similarly, the priest quite often left out the racial designation of important free coloreds. In a great many other cases, children were baptized unrecognized by their fathers. Although Stewart R. King asserts that men were likely to recognize paternity at the baptisms of their illegitimate children, my data for the Grande-Anse reveal no such instances of recognition of paternity. 3 A sample of thirty testaments recorded in the Grande-Anse between May 1780 3 King advocates establishing parentage based on the white godfather of colored children, but, based on the data that I have, I believe this approach to lack the rigor necessary to be an efficacious method of recreating family structure. In many cases white men of some standing in the community stood as godparents for colored children, both legitimate and illegitimate. It is tempting to argue as King does, because in many cases these white godfathers stood for children of color of a whiter phenotype than their mothers. Without other evidence (e.g., a last will and testament), I have refrained from naming fathers for children of color where the basis for this assumption in the sources is lacking. For his view of white godparentage of colored children, see King, Blue Coat or Powdered Wig, 13.

PAGE 71

61 and August 1789 provide room for some general conclusions before discussing how testators used these documents to protect their dependents after their own demise. There is a clear correspondence between gender and phenotype. Of the 30 testaments sampled, 23 (77%) of the testators were men, and only one of these men was nonwhite (see Table 4-2). The most common testator was an aged habitant concerned about those he would leave behind; the median age of the eighteen testators who gave their ages was 48 years. Although there is no way to compare this figure with the average age of the free population, it does not coincide with the image of the young immigrant fresh from the metropole, intent on his fortune. Likewise all of the female testators were women of color: 1 ingnue, 4 2 ngresses, 1 mtive, 2 multresses, and 1 griffe. 5 Table 4-2. Occupations of Male Testators (N=23) Habitant Trader 6 Merchant 7 Bureaucrat Artisan None Occupation 8 14 2 2 1 3 1 Sources: L6A-13, L6A-14, L6A-23, L6A-41, L6A-70, L6A-98, L6A-121, L6A-138, L6A-139, L6B-2, L6B-6, L6B-36, L6B-39, L6B-55, L6B-61, L6B-155, M1-13, M1-16, M1-89, G5-82, G5-101, G5-114 G5-130, all in JP-N. As mentioned above, men in the Grande-Anse who fathered illegitimate children did not accept their offspring as their own through baptismal rites. Instead, they preferred 4 Ingnu (feminine ingnue) in colonial practice referred to a person of free birth but presumably of some African or, less likely, indigenous ancestry. 5 With this obvious bias in mind, it is still useful to tap this means of understanding Jrmien society. As outlined in Table 3.7, half of the testators were landowners, or habitants, including one ingnue. Over a quarter more identified themselves as members of the urban sector. Finally, seven gave no occupation, six of whom were women. Daniel Scott Smith found that 36 percent of men and 6 percent of women left wills in Hingham, Massachusetts. Daniel Scott Smith, Underregistration and Bias in Probate Records: An Analysis of Data from Eighteenth-Century Hingham, Massachusetts, William and Mary Quarterly 32, no. 1 (January 1975), 104. 6 Marchand, a term indicating someone engaged only in local trade. 7 Ngociant, a term indicating someone engaged in international trade. 8 None refers to individuals without any stated means of gainful employment. Habitant/e refers likewise to landowners, no matter their socioeconomic power.

PAGE 72

62 to give tacit recognition through material support by way of testaments and, less often, by acts of donation. By reading through the lines, we can establish through a few examples the kinds of relationships that existed between menalmost always white menand their illegitimate offspring. In July 1782, Sr. Franois Desormeaux, a habitant residing at Trou Bonbon, delivered a heifer to le nomm Hildevert Sonfillers, the illegitimate son (fils naturel) of mtive Marie Louise Legendre, a plantation owner in her own right at Grande-Rivire. If Desormeauxs appointment as executor and attorney (procureur) to his fellow habitants is any indication of his standing in the local community, he could simply have shown paternalistic, not necessarily paternal, feelings toward Sonfillers: he also gave two cows to his goddaughter, but his donation due to the amity and humanity he felt for the young man suggests there was something more going on. 9 Another, clearer case of tacit paternal recognition came to pass with the testament of Sr. Joseph Pjac, a mason who resided at Les Camittes. As he lay dying of a hemorrhage, Pejac dictated his final wishes that, among other things, four quarteron children, presumably his, be given an allowance for their maintenance until they married or reached their majority. Two days later, Pejac, still on his deathbed and now claiming to be a navigator by profession, altered the legacy to his four children to be 1000 livres each for ten years. He showed special concern for the eldest, fifteen-year-old Franois, whom he described both times as an imbecile. He stressed his concern for all of the children, 9 His goddaughter, Demoiselle Bonne, the daughter of master surgeon Sr. Dominique Lelevain, produced three bulls and a gazelle by the time of the latters succession in February 1784. Donation of gazelle from Sr. Franois Desormeaux to le nomm Hildevert Sonfillers, 18 July 1782, Jrmie Papers, Notaries: L6A-38; and Succession of Sr. Dominique Lelevain, in life master surgeon at Trou Bonbon, 7 February 1784, ibid.: L6A-66.

PAGE 73

63 however, by making provision for his executor to be deposed if the latter did not enforce their legacy. 10 A third interesting case of a white mans attention to his presumed natural children was that of Sr. Jean-Baptiste de St. Martin. De St. Martin, a habitant at le Vieux Bourg, dictated his will as he prepared to depart from the Grande-Anse on business. He apparently felt less insecure than Pjac that his final wishes would be carried out. De St. Martin declared that he owed his housekeeper Marie Franoise dite Leloy 13,000 livres for the previous thirteen years of dedicated service. He also left a legacy for her two natural sons, born Dieudonn, baptized as Jean Baptiste Augustin and Pierre Fortun (the quantity of which, unfortunately, time has rotted away on the original manuscript) and ordered his creole slave driver (commandeur) Jean Baptiste to serve the two young quarterons for four years, after which time they were to appeal to the governor and intendant of the colony for his liberty. 11 Not only men used testaments to protect natural children from post-mortem legal entanglements. In her October 1786 testament, ngresse libre Marie Magdelaine Lizette Zbat moved to protect her multresse daughter whom she described as fille naturelle provenant de ses oeuvres." The work to which Zbat refers is elusive (perhaps prostitution), though couples seeking the sanctification of their unions often mentioned 10 Pejac, a native of Boudelat, diocese of Auch in Gascogne, had a partnership with the griffe Laurince Lachaume to run a store (magasin) at Les Camittes, apparently a warehouse where local planters (e.g., the Lafonds and Nol Azor, discussed below) stored their coffee while awaiting export to Jrmie or elsewhere. His four children discussed here were not Laurinces: all her children were multres and multresses. [1st] Testament of Sr. Joseph Pejac, 19 Sept 1785, ibid.: L6A-139; Dissolution of partnership between Sr. Joseph Pejac and la nomme Laurince grif libre, dite Lachaume, 20 September 1785, ibid.: L6A-140; 2nd Testament of Sr. Joseph Pejac, 20 September 1785, ibid.: L6A-141; and Testament of la nomme Laurince, griffe libre, dite Lachaume, 21 September 1785, ibid.: L6A-144. 11 Testament of Sr. Jean Baptiste de St. Martin, 26 June 1789, ibid.: T1-89.

PAGE 74

64 children who resulted from their oeuvres together. By her testament Zbat gave her daughter 300 livres a year pension until she reached her majority. The bulk of her estate was destined, however, for her executor, the multre Jean David, a man of unknown relation to the testator. 12 Unlike Zbat, ngresse Marguerite Boucan used her testament to seek the manumission of her son Jean Baptiste who had been enrolled in the towns police force as a cheap way to earn his freedom. Declaring that she lacked another legal heir (and not wanting or able to leave her estate to her son, a slave), Boucan willed her property to her executor, multre habitant Franois Roo dit Licaq. As in similar cases, Roo dit Licaq would have taken Jean Baptiste into his clientele following his mothers demise. 13 Finally, Marguerite Rozaire, the ingnue (free-born) widow of Sr. Alxis Humbert Bouchereau, sought to protect her son from the avarice of his older and legitimate half-siblings. She had borne him in her widowhood, and when she caught a fever she called for the notary in order to protect the boys interests. The clauses of her testament underlined her concern for his future welfare: she gave him two slaves from her plantations workforce and, to better protect him, she appointed the boys godfather as her executor. 14 These six vignettes suggest the ways in which men and women used their testaments to express their anxiety over the fate of their illegitimate children after their deaths and devised ways to protect those without to protect them from legitimate heirs 12 Testament of Marie Magdelaine Lizette Zbat, 5 October 1786, ibid.: L6B-45.. 13 Testament of Marguerite Boucan, 12 July 1785, ibid.: L6A-112. On military manumissions, see King, Blue Coat or Powdered Wig, 109. 14 L6A-52.

PAGE 75

65 who would seek to deprive them of material support in the future. In effect, they implied (in some cases stronger than others) that the executor of their respective estates was to be the patron and protector of children left without other legal recourse, and as the guardian of the deceased persons estate and its resources, the executor was in an ideal position to show favoritism to illegitimate but cherished heirs. 15 Paternalistic sentiment extended beyond just protecting illegitimate children, however. Godparentage was one way to create special ties between families, and these ties went both vertical from patron to client and horizontally between families of equal standing. In May 1781, Jacques Lafond of Fond dIcaque stood as godfather to the infant son of Celestin Betouzet of La Voldrogue, thus strengthening the bond between two prominent colored planting families. Three months later, Lafond became the godfather of his nephew Paul Fortunat, this time bringing his own family closer together. 16 Vertical connections forged through godparentage are easier to see. In 1781, the priest at Jrmie baptized fifteen illegitimate colored children. In these cases, the men who stepped forward to godfather these children represented patrons to whom the children and their mothers could turn for support. The prevalence of white men in this role suggests that whites played a significant role as the patrons of the gens de couleur. 17 This is not to say that men of color did not play their role as patrons to other people of color who lacked their success or advantages. Quarteron planter Jean Cadet Atlasse, 15 In the case of the male testators described above, it is telling that they threatened and begged their executors to care for their illegitimate offspring but never officially recognized them, a step that would have made these children legitimate heirs on equal footing with relatives in France, for instance. 16 Ecclesiastical records, 1781, Jrmie, JP-G. 17 Ibid.

PAGE 76

66 for instance, was the court-appointed guardian of Jean Marie Madre, a young man of color who entered into a partnership with another young multre to plant coffee in La Guinaude, the same canton where Atlasse lived. 18 Another commonplace mechanism for patronage within this society was individual slave manumissions, in a way similar to that of Sr. de St. Martins creole commandeur who would continue to serve the masters family in case of his death. Patronage presents an ideological explanation for the economically illogical habit of liberating ones obedient and, often, elite slaves such as drivers, artisans, and domestics, who were often quite valuable both in terms of crude monetary value and potential for profit. In January 1785, Jacques Lafond acted out the patrons role towards a ngresse named Marie-Claire who belonged to the Berquier family. He and his wife, Jeanne Petit dite Jeannette, explained to the notary that in 1776 while the latter was married to her first husband, Paul Fortunat, she had Monsieur Berquiers approval for her to send a slave to work in Marie-Claires place for ten years. In the 1785 act, Berquiers widow agreed to have Marie-Claire emancipated in return for this second slave to compensate for the necessary liberty tax. 19 While the paternal relationship between patrons and clients was important in Jrmien society, so was friendship. In October 1784, Louis Lacheville donated his coffee plantation at Fond d'Icaque to Jean Baptiste Cophi. Both men were hommes de couleur libres (free men of color): Lacheville was a multre and Cophi a ngre. Though the document formalizing the donation gives no indication of the relationship between the 18 Partnership between Jean Marie Madre and Gilles Bouquet, multres, JP-G. 19 Ratification, 25 January 1785, L6A-90.

PAGE 77

67 two men, it is apparent that it was a close one. Lacheville agreed to donate all his property to Cophi but retained use of it until his death. Reading between the lines, it seems that Lacheville was establishing Cophi as his heir on the stipulation that he care for him in his old age. This donation appears to be an example of the strong binds of friendship found occasionally in notarial documents, evidence perhaps of the need for a trusted friend in a society like that of Saint-Domingue numerically dominated by immigrant men, both free and enslaved. 20 The importance of exchanging property with ones friends comes out in testaments, when the testators closest friends became his executors and, if he lacked any kin to inherit his estate, his universal heirs as well. Placing friends in such trusted positions insured that ones debts were paid and that beloved but illegitimate heirs were protected from less well-regarded ones who had better claims on the estate. A necessary addition to this discussion of connections within society is marriage patterns. To do this, I will reconstruct two free colored planting families. Unlike their counterparts in those parts of the North and West studied by Stewart R. King, the free coloreds of the Grande-Anse do not appear to have generated a military elite. Archers de police occasionally left their mark in the notaries registers, but the data I collected 20 Aside from the interpersonal relationships that can be deduced from the document, other details of Lacheville's economic life also come to light. He owned 6000 coffee trees, thirteen horses--seven mares and six foals--and one slave, a Congolese man named Joli Coeur. Aside from his income from coffee, and given the relatively small number of trees on his land and his very small workforce, horse-trading may have been a profitable enterprise. He acquired most of his horses from Noel Azor and Jacques Lafond, hommes de couleur who lived nearby and about whom more will be said below. The very high fertility rate among his horses (86 per 100) indicates that he was actively breeding his stock, perhaps with an neighbor as a business partner. Donation of habitation from Louis Lacheville to Jean Baptiste Cophi, L6A-74, 8 Oct 1784, Jrmie Papers.

PAGE 78

68 indicates no significant connections involving men who identified themselves as being of that occupation. 21 The case is stronger for a free colored planter elite in the Grande-Anse, but identifying its members using Kings methodology presents problems. For whatever reason, free coloreds did not sell large properties worth 10,000 livres. Perhaps they held onto what they possessed, or maybe the free coloreds in the quartier were not wealthy individuals. It is necessary, then, to resort to qualitative means of determining who was important among the local free coloreds. I have decided then to focus on the connections forged by two families whose members appear to have been quite important to less affluent free coloreds, the Lafonds and the Atlasses. The Lafonds who appear in the notarial and ecclesiastical records of the 1780s were the quarteron sons and daughters of Sr. Antoine Lafond, a European who married Genevive Gagnard, a multresse, before 1765. To understand the origin of this family, one has to begin with the cursory observations Moreau de Saint-Mry made in his Description. As he guides his reader on a tour of the parish from west to east, the author stops for a moment to describe Fond dIcaque, which he notes was a dependency of Les Camittes and a place named for the many plants called icaquiers growing in its vicinity. Fond dIcaque is a long, narrow valley running east to west. The valleys bottom is a 21 Only one individual encountered in the Jrmie Papers claimed to have served in the colored expeditionary forces, the Chasseurs-Royaux, that King indicates was so important, but and he was an emigrant from the North. This mans testament is important, however, because it shows how notaries tampered with the racial designations of their clients. In preparing his draft of the testament, the notary disputed Duponts claim to have been born as issue of a legitimate marriage and downgraded his phenotype from mtif to multre.

PAGE 79

69 marsh, but Moreau asserts that the habitants grew coffee in the higher places in the marsh and ran pigs on the slopes. 22 By the early 1780s, a free colored enclave existed on the land grant of 1,400 carreaux that Sieur Lafond received from the Crown. His son Jacques Lafond, fils, and son-in-law Nol Azor prospered as coffee planters, and the scant evidence available indicates that family members owned adjacent properties. His sons and sons-in-law became godfathers to each others children, and when Genevive Lafonds husband Paul Fortunat met an untimely death her brother Pierre and brother-in-law Nol Azor became the legal protectors of her children. 23 A second colored planter family that is well-documented in the notarial archive, is that of Jean Cadet Atlasse. The family matriarch, Marguerite Laroche dite Atlasse, was manumitted in 1728. As a freedwoman she immigrated to the Grand'Anse by January 1771, when her freedom papers were registered with the local government registrar. In August of that year, she bought up sieur Jean Agasses half of the coffee plantation that he owned with sieur Jean Georges Sauvanelle. In late August 1787 she sold the plantation in the canton of la Guinaude to a white named Joseph Fondelin for 100,000 livres but retained use of her own bedchamber in the grandcase. 24 The following month, Marguerite Atlasse's three daughters banded together behind their brother Jean Cadet 22 The modern editors of Description . de la partie franaise indicate that Antoine Lafond was a native of Bourg Saint-Andol, habitant propritaire at Fond dIcaque, parish of Jrmie, husband of Genevive Gagnard, multresse. He died 3 January 1780, at the age of about 70 years. They based this and other biographical details on documents consulted at the Archives Nationales, Paris. Moreau, Description, 3: 1390-1391, 1506. 23 Marriage contract between Louis Macaya and Genevive Lafond, 19 February 1789, L6B-167. 24 Sale of coffee plantation at la Guinaude by sieur Joseph Fondelin to les nomms Jean Cadet Atlasse et al., 4 September 1787, M-15, Jrmie Papers.

PAGE 80

70 Atlasse to buy back their mother's estate from Fondelin for 10,000 livres more than their mother had sold it for. Fondelin pocketed the extra money, and Marguerite Atlasse gained a yearly pension from her children as Fondelin passed his mortgage on the property to them. Before discussing connections established by the Lafond and Atlasse through marriage, it is necessary to discuss free colored marriage choice in more general terms. A sample of marriages drawn from the 1781 ecclesiastical records and from marriage contracts drawn up during the 1780s suggests that officially sanctioned marriages, unlike casual or consensual unions, were nearly always endogamous, in the sense of whites marrying whites and nonwhites marrying nonwhites. A sample of ten marriages involving white spouses bears this out: in nine of the cases, both parties were white; in the tenth, the phenotype of the bride is unknown. More to the point is a sample of 21 marriages involving free coloreds (see Table 4-3). In 62% (13) of the cases, both of the spouses were of the same phenotype. When the spouses were of different hue, there was a nearly even division between those cases in which the groom was darker and in those cases in which the bride was the darker spouse. In all cases involving marriages between persons of different phenotypes, there was almost always one degree of difference in color between the spouses. For example, Jean Baptiste Franois Etienne Bazile dit Estienne, a multre, brought 4500 livres when contracting marriage with Julie Brgard, a quarteronne who brought 4300 livres worth of property into the marriage. The implications of this match are clear: Estienne, a multre of illegitimate birth contracted to

PAGE 81

71 marry a quarteronne of similar circumstances and of similar wealth. In their case, socioeconomic position negated any phenotypical differences. 25 Table 4-3. Marriage Choice among the Gens de couleur libres (N=20) Phenotype: Groom-Bride Frequency Degree of Difference 26 Multre-Multresse 8 0 Mtif-Multresse 1 2 Quarteron-Quarteronne 2 0 Ngre-Ngresse 2 0 Indien 27 -Ngresse 1 1 Tierceron-Tierceronne 1 0 Quarteron-Multresse 2 1 Grif-Multresse 1 1 Mtif-Quarteronne 1 1 Multre-Quarteronne 1 1 Note: Excluded from this table is one couple; the groom was described as affrachi, and the bride was a ngresse. Such a model is, however, reductionistic and leaves out any ideological factors at play, such as how the parties felt towards each other. The sources do not allow us to go so far as to say that parties contracting marriage before a notary and celebrating marriage before a priest were in romantic love in the modern sense. Some did, however, relate feelings of friendship (amiti), one to the other as grooms in particular planned for the dissolution of their marriage by death. Marriage contracts, both between whites and between coloreds, occasionally included clauses allowing the survivor rights of usufruct 25 Marriage contract, 5 May 1786, G5-106. 26 Using Moreau de Saint-Mrys description of racial mixture as a guide, I have attempted to show here that marriages between persons of different phenotypes occurred without a great jump in color difference. 27 It is unknown whether the indien in question, Nicolas Bessin, was of ancestry indigenous to Hispaniola or of elsewhere. Moreau de Saint-Mry argued that descent from West Indians (indiens occidentaux) should be calculated as for the multres to whom he compared them, that they were in effect straight-haired mulattoes.

PAGE 82

72 over some or all of the communal estate or the claim to property from the estate up to a specified value (often 1000 livres but more for wealthier couples). The marriage patterns of members of the Lafond family correspond with the samples discussed above. It remains unclear what free coloreds found desirable in a spouses conditions of color and birth. Sieur Lafonds daughter Genevive married the first time to Paul Fortunat, a quarteron, and the second to Louis Macaya, a multre of unrecognized paternity. The apparent factors at play in her second choice apparently included finding a stepfather for her young children from her first marriage, but in reductionistic terms, she was actually marrying down in society, because Macaya was, unlike her, illegitimate and was darker than her. According to the colonial discourse related by Moreau de Saint-Mry, coloreds should be whitening, but on the frontier in Fond dIcaque, in relative isolation ten leagues from the sea, free coloreds seemed able to define a discourse that only survived as fragments in the notarial archive. Members of the Atlasse family, though of different social origins, demonstrated similar marriage patterns. Marguerite Atlasses four children pursued different routes in establishing their own households. Jean Cadet Atlasse married a multresse, had at least three children, and managed his own plantation in La Guinaude adjacent to the one he and his sisters bought from Fondelin. One of his sisters, Barbe Gertrude Gaucherelle, was an habitante at Les Roseaux and a widow by 1787. Her daughter Elizabeth Viard, herself only two generations from slavery, married a white immigrant from Bordeaux, Jacques Eglize, in 1787. The second sister, Franoise Atlasse, married Franois Bouchereau, a quarteron coffee planter from La Grande-Rivire, with whom she had at least three children. The third sister, Marie Thrze Sauvanelle dite Sanite, never married but had

PAGE 83

73 five children nonetheless. She diversified her investments between a small store in La Haute-Ville and a share in the family plantation at La Guinaude, and at the time of her death in 1789 she was nearly worth enough to give each of her children the 10,000 livres that she wanted to. 28 From the marriage patterns of the couples included in the samples discussed above and of the members of the Atlasse and Lafond families, it appears that free coloreds usually married individuals of their own phenotype (e.g., multres tended to marry multresses) but that when they married individuals of color different from their own that they did so within certain limits. If this is true, multres tended to marry griffes, quarteronnes, and perhaps ngresses but not persons of phenotypes very much lighter or darker than they. Religious Belief Although testaments are a useful source for understanding personal relationships, they are also an interesting source for exploring religious belief. In an area which lacked a parish church and where the rectory shared a town lot with a powder magazine, it is interesting to probe briefly into how testators invoked the supernatural, or not, as they declared their final intentions. As with similar documents, we can know only what they cared to tell the notary, perhaps not what their inner beliefs were. Most were content with commending their spirit to the Almighty, to be received, they hoped, into the presence of the bien heureux or with affirming that they were good Catholics who wished to die in the faith. Some were more creative. Sr. Isaac Delahaye, by 1789 a blind old planter, declared that I commend my soul to God, Father, Son, and Holy Spirit . to be placed 28 Rental of a petit magasin, 26 October 1789, G5-132, JP-N.

PAGE 84

74 in the Kingdom . [and I ask] all the Saints of Paradise and especially St. Isaac, my patron, to intercede on my behalf. Likewise, as he lay sick in bed, Sr. Joseph Vigneau expressed his hope that as a Christian, Catholic, Roman, and Apostolic, he commends his soul to God, the Father in all persons, to the Bien heureuse Virgin Mary, to the saints of Paradise, asking His Divine Majesty to have mercy upon him and to receive his soul after its Separation from his Body. Finally, habitant Sr. Antoine Dolle expressed his desire for a simple funeral sans pompe and left the details to the good sense of his executor. 29 The Free Coloreds Rise Up While they participated in the economic and social life of the quartier with whites until the end of the ancien rgime, the prominent men of color in the Grande-Anse also played their part in opposing the forces of white supremacy in the Revolution. While the slaves in the North began their famous uprising in August 1791, the free coloreds of the West started their own struggle for equality, though the two movements were unrelated and had quite different ends. 30 The free coloreds of the Camittes region likewise converged on Fond dIcaque, where Jacques Lafond, Nol Azor, and a third man named Page led a rebellion, no doubt calling upon their friends, relatives, and clients to play their part. Not much is known about this rebellion, aside from those contained in a memoir entitled Prcis historique. The author, who was residing in Port-au-Prince during the early years of the revolution, related that the Fond dIcaque free coloreds rose up, 29 Testament of Sr. Isaac Delahaye, 10 August 1789, G5-130, JP-N; and Testament of Sr. Joseph Vigneau, 23 December 1781, L6A-23, ibid. 30 David Patrick Geggus, Haitian Revolutionary Studies (Bloomington: University of Indiana Press, 2002), 99-102.

PAGE 85

75 apparently in sympathy with other rebels closer to the colonial capital. According to the authors account, the blood of the whites flowed in long streams. Nearly 80 whites had their throats cut. They did not spare the women, not the pregnant Dame Desjourn nor Dame Plinquet and her little ones. The whites responded with force, arming their slaves to put down the revolt and never forgiving the free coloreds for the atrocities they held them to have committed. 31 The rebellious brothers-in-law survived the abortive revolt and the subsequent violence against the gens de couleur. Following the British withdrawal from Jrmie in 1793, Lafond acted as justice of the peace for the commune du Corail, at least for a time. He was dead by 1797, when his widow rented out his plantation. Our last glimpse of Azor comes a year earlier, when the officers of the snchausse (operating under the supervision of the occupying government) auctioned two of his slaves for his part played in aiding the enemies of His [Britannic] Majesty. 32 Conclusion Patterns of marriage and other social interaction in the Grande-Anse revolved around patronage. Godparentage circulated patronage within free colored families, strengthened bonds between families, and created ties with social inferiors, and marriage both legitimized consensual relationships and any children born of those relations and extended ties between families. The Lafond and Atlasse families are examples of prominent free colored planters who created connections between its members and with other free coloreds. These connections were ultimately important in the Haitian 31 Anonymous, Prcis historique, 1: 64; and David P. Geggus, Slavery, War, and Revolution 32 L8-134, JP-N.

PAGE 86

76 Revolution, particularly in its early stages, when free coloreds fought against the white supremacy that had been the colonial status quo.

PAGE 87

CHAPTER 5 CONCLUSION The coffee boom that swept through the highlands of the French colony of Saint-Domingue in the 1770s and 1780s brought about great social, economic, and demographic change in its wake. In the quartier de la Grande-Anse on the southern peninsula, these changes meant an increase in trade with both Europe and other colonial ports, the massive importation of African slaves to work newly created coffee and mixed-crop plantations, and a large immigration of settlers from Frances Atlantic ports and Caribbean colonies. The most obscured effect of the boom is its ecological component. The three major strata of the colonial populationwhites, coloreds, and slavesall experienced huge increases, but this was a phenomenon felt throughout the colonys coffee zones. The difference in the Grande-Anse is that whites formed the majority of the free population, both before the boom and after it began. Though some free coloreds did make it well as coffee planters, an indeterminate number also operated small market farms to feed the plantations and the nascent towns. Others competed with whites as carpenters and other artisans in the building trades to construct the plantation homes, stores, millhouses, and slave quarters so much in demand. The number of African slaves imported to work on the coffee plantations also increased in leaps and bounds during the 1780s, but so did the creole slave population, which represented over a third of the slave population in our sample presented in Chapter 3. Of the imported slaves, those from West Central Africa predominated, which suggests 77

PAGE 88

78 the importance of Congos to slave culture in the Grande-Anse. We have also discussed, provisionally, the diet, housing, and family structure of Jrmien coffee slaves. Finally, in Chapter 3, we discussed marriage patterns and patronage among the free population, particularly people of color. From the evidence available, it appears that in the 1780s most marriages in the Grande-Anse were within ones own race. Free coloreds married free coloreds and whites married whites. One of the interesting issues under consideration is marriage choice among free coloreds based on the phenotype and legitimacy of ones spouse. The small sample presented in this chapter suggests that coloreds married individuals most often married individuals with their own phenotypes or otherwise those not much lighter or darker than their own. Finally, we considered the limited evidence for Jrmien colored participation in the Haitian Revolution, both in the initial revolts in 1793 and the war for independence that lasted 1802-1803. All of the elements of Jrmien society presented in this thesis are meant to be preliminary analyses of a region of Saint-Domingue largely neglected by historians until now. Though by no means the largest or most cosmopolitan of colonial towns, Jrmie was important for the export of coffee and other tropical commodities through the islands entrepts and was a significant disembarkation point for the Atlantic slave trade. Further evidence for Jrmies commerce lies hidden in the predominant colonial newspaper, Les Affiches Amricaines, awaiting compilation of shipping notices and coffee prices. The Jrmie Papers, upon which this study is largely based, also promise more than enough documentation for a social history of the turbulent 1790s, when the Grande-Anse became a British protectorate for five years. As we have noted in Chapter 1,

PAGE 89

79 it appears that many of the affluent white families stayed on in Jrmie, at least until the final French withdrawal in 1803. In perspective, the significance of the Grande-Anse is as a counterpoint to dominant trends in the rest of the colony. Its free population remained white throughout the latter half of the eighteenth century, rather than becoming predominantly colored with the coffee boom. Perhaps in part because of this demographic feature, the quartier welcomed the British occupation as black and colored revolutionaries threatened white supremacy. The present work is a seminal effort to understand the history of this interesting region, but much remains to be done to explain how society developed on one of Saint-Domingues internal frontiers.

PAGE 90

LIST OF REFERENCES Primary Sources: Manuscripts Debien, Gabriel, ed. Prcis historique des annals de la colonie franoise de Saint-Domingue (Juillet 1789 Mai 1802): manuscript anonyme. 2 vols. Typescript, Archives de la Vienne, n.d. Jrmie Papers, Department of Special and Area Collections, George A. Smathers Library, University of Florida. Notaries: Lpine, Thomas, Girard, Lefrotter. Greffe: Ecclesiastical Records, 1781 Primary Sources: Contemporary Printed Matter Barb-Marbois, Franois. tat des finances de Saint-Domingue. Paris: Imprimerie Royale: 1790. Laborie, Pierre-Joseph. The Coffee Planter of San Domingo. London: T. Cadell and W. Davies, 1798. Moreau de Saint-Mry, M. L. E. Description topographique, physique, civile, politique et historique de la partie franaise de lisle Saint-Domingue. Edited by Blanche Maurel and tienne Taillemitte. 3 vols. Paris: Socit de LHistoire des Colonies Franaises, 1958. Secondary Sources Beckles, Hilary McD. Sugar and White Servitude: An Analysis of White Indentured Labor during the Sugar Revolution of Barbados, 1643-1655. Journal of the Barbados Museum and Historical Society 36, no. 3 (1981): 236-46. Curto, Jos C. Enslaving Spirits: The Portuguese-Brazilian Alcohol Trade at Luanda and Its Hinterland, 1550-1830. Leiden: Brill, 2004. Craton, Michael. Empire, Enslavement and Freedom in the Caribbean. Kingston: Ian Randle Publishers, 1997. Curtin, Philip. The Atlantic Slave Trade: A Census. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press, 1969. 80

PAGE 91

81 Debien, Gabriel. Les esclaves aux Antilles franaises, XVIIe-XVIIIe sicles. Basse-Terre: Socit dHistoire de la Guadeloupe, 1974. Fick, Carolyn. The Making of Haiti: The Saint Domingue Revolution from Below. Knoxville: University of Tennessee Press, 1990. Frostin, Charles. Les revoltes blanches Saint-Domingue aux XVIIe-XVIIIe sicles. Paris: Lcole, 1975. Garrigus, John. Blue and Brown: Contraband Indigo and the Rise of a Free Colored Planter Class in French Saint Domingue. Americas 50, no. 2 (October 1993): 233-63. ________. A Struggle for Respect: The Free Coloreds of Saint Domingue, 1770-1779 Ph.D. diss., Johns Hopkins University, 1989. Geggus, David P. Haitian Revolutionary Studies. Bloomington: University of Indiana Press, 2002. ________. Haitian Voodoo in the Eighteenth Century: Language, Culture, Resistance. Jahrbuch fr Geschichte von Staat, Windschaft und Geschelschaft Weinamerikas 28 (1991): 1-31. ________. Slave and Free Colored Women in Saint Domingue. In David B. Gaspar and Darlene C. Hine, eds. More than Chattel: Black Women and Slavery in the Americas, 259-78. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1996. ________. Slavery, War, and Revolution: The British Occupation of Saint Domingue, 1793-1798. Oxford: Clarendon, 1982. ________. Sugar and Coffee Cultivation in Saint Domingue and the Shaping of the Slave Labor Force. In Ira Berlin and Philip D. Morgan, eds. Cultivation and Culture: Labor and the Shaping of Slave Life in the Americas, 73-97. Charlottesville: University Press of Virginia, 1993. Higman, B. W. Slave Populations of the British Caribbean, 1807-1834. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press, 1984. James, C. L. R. The Black Jacobins: Toussaint LOuverture and the San Domingo Revolution. New York: Knopf, 1963. King, Stewart R. Blue Coat or Powdered Wig: Free People of Color in Pre-Revolutionary Saint Domingue. Athens: University of Georgia Press, 2001. Kiple, Kenneth F. The Caribbean Slave: A Biological History. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1984.

PAGE 92

82 ________ and Virginia H. Kiple. Deficiency Diseases in the Caribbean. Journal of Interdisciplinary History 11, no. 2 (1980), reprinted in Hilary Beckles and Verene Shepherd, eds. Caribbean Slave Society and Economy: A Student Reader. New York: The New Press, 1991. Klein, Herbert S. The Colored Militia of Cuba, 1568-1868. Caribbean Studies 6 (1966): 17-27. McClellan, James E., III. Colonialism and Science: Saint Domingue in the Old Regime. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1992. Miller, Joseph C. Way of Death: Merchant Capitalism and the Angolan Slave Trade, 1730-1830. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press, 1988. Scott, Daniel. Underregistration and Bias in Probate Records: An Analysis of Data from Eighteenth-Century Hingham, Massachusetts. William and Mary Quarterly 32, no. 1 (January 1975): 100-110 Socolow, Susan. Economic Roles of the Free Women of Color of Cap Franais. In David Gaspar and Darlene Hine, eds. More than Chattel: Black Women and Slavery in the Americas, 279-97. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1996. Trouillot, Michel-Rolph. Coffee Planters and Coffee Slaves in the Antilles: The Impact of a Secondary Crop. In Ira Berlin and Philip D. Morgan, eds. Cultivation and Culture: Labor and the Shaping of Slave Life in the Americas, 124-37. Charlottesville: University Press of Virginia, 1993. ________. Motion in the System: Coffee, Color, and Slavery in Eighteenth-Century Saint Domingue. Review 8 (Winter 1982): 331-88. Vovelle, Michel. Pit baroque et Dchristianisation en Provence au XVIIIe sicle. Paris: ditions du C.T.H.S., 1997.

PAGE 93

BIOGRAPHICAL SKETCH Keith Anthony Manuel was born in Opelousas, Louisiana, in 1981. After graduating from Port Barre High School in Port Barre, Louisiana, in 1999, Mr. Manuel attended the University of Louisiana at Lafayette, from which he was graduated with honors in 2003 with a bachelor of arts in history. He began graduate studies at the University of Florida in August 2003. After graduating, Mr. Manuel plans to continue his studies in Latin American and Caribbean history at that institution with the goal of receiving a doctoral degree. He currently resides in Gainesville, Florida, with his wife Bridget, his daughter Rebecca, and two small felines. 83


Permanent Link: http://ufdc.ufl.edu/UFE0011650/00001

Material Information

Title: Slavery, Coffee, and Family in a Frontier Society: Jeremie and Its Hinterland, 1780-1789
Physical Description: Mixed Material
Copyright Date: 2008

Record Information

Source Institution: University of Florida
Holding Location: University of Florida
Rights Management: All rights reserved by the source institution and holding location.
System ID: UFE0011650:00001

Permanent Link: http://ufdc.ufl.edu/UFE0011650/00001

Material Information

Title: Slavery, Coffee, and Family in a Frontier Society: Jeremie and Its Hinterland, 1780-1789
Physical Description: Mixed Material
Copyright Date: 2008

Record Information

Source Institution: University of Florida
Holding Location: University of Florida
Rights Management: All rights reserved by the source institution and holding location.
System ID: UFE0011650:00001


This item has the following downloads:


Full Text










SLAVERY, COFFEE, AND FAMILY IN A FRONTIER SOCIETY:
JEREMIE AND ITS HINTERLAND, 1780-1789














By

KEITH ANTHONY MANUEL


A THESIS PRESENTED TO THE GRADUATE SCHOOL
OF THE UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT
OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF
MASTER OF ARTS

UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA


2005





























Copyright 2005

by

Keith Anthony Manuel















ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

Many people helped this thesis along from start to finish. I must first thank my

committee chair, David Geggus, for his assistance throughout the life of this project,

especially his patient editing just prior to my oral defense. This manuscript would also

not be what it is without the perceptive comments of my two readers, Jeffrey Needell and

Jon Sensbach. I must also give much credit to the staff of the Department of Area and

Special Collections and the Latin American Collection of the University of Florida

Libraries for their assistance in gathering together the primary and secondary material I

used in this project. Particular gratitude is due to Bruce Chappell for key professional

and, at times, critical personal support. Others who have helped one way or another

(some more than they can know) include Peter Wolf, David Wheat, Maury Wiseman, Mil

Willis, and Julia Frederick. Finally, I must thank my family for supporting me, especially

in the last frantic stages of writing. My wife, Bridget, who deserves much credit for her

patience with my preoccupation, and my daughter, Rebecca, have given me the strength

to carry it through.
















TABLE OF CONTENTS

page

A C K N O W L E D G M E N T S ......... ................................................................................... iii

LIST OF TABLES ..................... .. .. .................. ................ ............ vi

LIST OF FIGURES ...................... .......... ................ ....... ........viii

ABSTRACT ........ .............. ............. ...... .......... .......... ix

CHAPTER

1. INTRODUCTION AND HISTORIOGRAPHICAL REVIEW.................................... 1

2. GOVERNANCE, ECONOMY, AND SOCIETY .......................................................8

G geographical O v erview ..................................................................... .....................9
S o city ............................................................................... 16
E c o n o m y ........................................................................... 2 1
Planters and Plantations .................. ............................ .. ...... .. ............ 32
C o n c lu sio n s..................................................... ................ 3 7

3. PLANTATION SLAVERY IN THE GRANDE-ANSE ..........................................38

The N aming of Slaves and Ethnicity .................................... ............ ............... 43
The Slaves' D iet ........................... ........ .......... ................. ............ 49
Occupational M obility on Coffee Plantations ................................. ................ 53
H housing and Com m unity ................................................... ........................ .55
C o n c lu sio n s..................................................... ................ 5 7

4. FAMILY, RACE, AND PATRONAGE IN THE GRANDE-ANSE BEFORE THE
FREN CH REVOLU TION ............................................................................ 59

R elig iou s B elief ................................................... ................ 7 3
T he F ree C oloreds R ise U p .............................................................. .....................74
Conclusion .............. ............................ .......................... ... 75

5. C O N C L U SIO N ............................................................................... 77













L IST O F R E FE R E N C E S ........................................................................ .....................80

B IO G R A PH IC A L SK E T C H ...................................................................... ..................83
























































v
















LIST OF TABLES


Table page

2-1. Population Increase in the Parish of Jeremie.............................. ..........9

2-2. Militia Enrollment by Race, 1751-1789................................. ...............20

2-3. Summary of Property Ownership in Saint-Domingue, Listed by Major Ports of
Em barkation, 1788 .................................... ... ........ ...............22

2 -4 E x p ort Statistics, 17 88 ....................................................................... ..................2 5

2-5. Annual Commodity Production in the Grande-Anse, 1788 (Thousands of
P o u n d s) ...................... .. .............. .. ....................................................2 5

2-6. Sample of Slaving Vessels Calling at Jeremie, 1788-1791 ....................................26

2-7. Immigrants to the Grande-Anse, 1780-1789.................................. .................28

2-8. Slave and Landholding on 13 Coffee and Mixed-Crop Plantations in the Grande-
A nse, 1780-1792 ......................................................................33

2-9. Real property Owned by the Berquier Family, ca. 1803, for which the Family
R received C om sensation ......... ................. ................... ................... ............... 36

3-1. Numbers of Africans and Creoles on Eighteen Coffee and Mixed-Crop
Plantations in the Grande-Anse, 1780-1792 (N=551).................... ..................40

3-2. Summary of the Origins of Slaves on Coffee and Mixed-Crop Plantations in the
Grand'Anse (N=606)..................... ............ ..... ........ .. ......41

3-3. Some Factors Bearing on Slave Life on Eighteen Coffee and Mixed-Crop
Plantations, 1780-1792, Based on Notarized Plantation Inventories....................42

3-4. Slave Fertility Indexes on Eighteen Coffee and Mixed-Crop Plantations by Size
of Plantation W orkforce, 1782-1792.................... ................. .... ............... 43

3-5. The Origins of Slaves on Eighteen Coffee and Mixed-Crop Plantations in the
Grande-Anse, 1780-1792 (N=606) ............................................... ............... 45

3-6. Profiles of Commandeurs on Coffee and Mixed-Crop Plantations in the Grande-
A n se, 17 8 0 -17 9 2 ................................................... ................ 5 5









3-7. Slave Housing on Small and Middling Coffee and Mixed-Crop Plantations in the
G rande-A nse, 1780-1789 (N =9) ........................................ ......................... 56

4-1. Infants Baptized in the Parish of Jeremie, 1781 ................. ............... ............... 59

4-2. Occupations of M ale Testators (N=23) .......................................... ............... 61

4-3. Marriage Choice among the Gens de couleur libres (N=20) ..............................71
















LIST OF FIGURES


Figure p

2-1. Urban Development in Jeremie, 1765-1788...................... ..... ............... 14

3-1. Population Pyramid of the Workforces on Eighteen Coffee and Mixed-Crop
Plantations in the Grande-Anse, 1782-1792 (N=551).................... ..................39















Abstract of Thesis Presented to the Graduate School
of the University of Florida in Partial Fulfillment of the
Requirements for the Degree of Master of Arts

SLAVERY, COFFEE, AND FAMILY IN A FRONTIER SOCIETY:
JEREMIE AND ITS HINTERLAND, 1780-1789

By

Keith Anthony Manuel

August 2005

Chair: David Patrick Geggus
Major Department: History

Between the end of the Seven Years' War in 1763 and the spread of the French

Revolution to the island in 1791, coffee became an important export crop in the French

colony of Saint-Domingue (present-day Haiti). This crop proliferated in the colony's

mountains where sugar could not be grown profitably. The resulting coffee boom drew

thousands of new colonists from Europe, the French West Indies, and Louisiana who

imported tens of thousands of slaves.

This thesis sheds light on the conditions of life during the coffee boom in the

vicinity of the town of Jeremie in the southwestern part of Saint-Domingue. This

previously neglected region received its share of both colonists and slaves. The thesis

uncovers some details about the lives of the colonists, including to some degree their

marriage patterns (i.e., interracial vs. intraracial marriages), the degree to which they

were able to exploit their landholdings, and personal relationships between whites and

free people of color. Some light is also shed on the lives of the slaves who daily worked









the coffee groves. The thesis includes a quantitative analysis of a sample of these slaves

based on slave lists included in inventories of coffee and mixed crop estates (i.e.,

plantations planted in coffee and either cotton or cacao). Finally, the thesis also

establishes some previously unknown details about free colored men who led the local

fight against white supremacy in the early years of the revolution. Notarized documents

provide some interesting details about Noel Azor and Jacques Lafond, who led free

coloreds and slaves in revolt at Fond d'Icaque in 1791. Documentation consulted for this

thesis suggeststhat free coloreds did not own much land devoted to coffee cultivation but

rather that a few free coloreds did become coffee planters in Jeremie, largely due to

capital inherited from their white fathers.














CHAPTER 1
INTRODUCTION AND HISTORIOGRAPHICAL REVIEW

The town of Jeremie in southwestern Saint-Domingue and its hinterland, known as

the Grande-Anse, experienced a frenetic expansion in coffee production in the 1770s and

1780s. This was the region's third economic boom during the eighteenth century. In the

1730s, cacao had become a major plantation staple, and in the 1750s coffee began to

expand. This latter boom apparently continued until 1774, when coffee prices fell.

Between 1783, when prices recovered, and 1791, the outbreak of the Haitian Revolution,

coffee spread through the highlands of Saint-Domingue, and the Grande-Anse was one

focus of this expanding coffee frontier.1

Jeremie was the principal urban area of one of the colony's 52 parishes and was the

seat of one of its 26 quarters, administrative (though not always judicial) units that

usually encompassed more than one ecclesiastical parish. Though it had the privilege to

engage in international commerce, Jeremie remained a second-rate port largely

subordinate to the colony's major entrep6ts, Port-au-Prince and Cap Francais, although in

the late 1780s French ships began calling at Jeremie in greater numbers. All the while,

contraband trade probably remained extensive, particularly with the English in Jamaica

and the Dutch at Curacao.

In 1788, along with other agricultural and industrial enterprises, Saint-Domingue

had 2,810 cafeteries (coffee plantations) and 792 sucreries (sugar plantations); 105 of the


1To clarify, I use the word region here and hereafter in reference to the Grande-Anse as a part of Saint-
Domingue.









former and 8 of the latter were in the quarter of Jeremie. Although only a small

contributor to the overall colonial economy, Jeremie did export the majority of the coffee

originating in the South Province, which developed in large part following the Seven

Years' War (1756-1763). Although regional trade statistics are easily accessible only for

1788 and 1789, it is clear that Jeremie and the colony's other highland regions

experienced a boom in both the production of export commodities and population.2

The immigrants who revolutionized society in the Grande-Anse in particular and

highland Saint-Domingue in general came from three quite different sources. First, the

coffee boom drew immigrants from other parts of the colony and from other possessions

of the French Crown in the West Indies. Second, immigrants from France's Atlantic

ports, both rich and poor, arrived in the Grande-Anse intent on making their fortune.

Finally, and most important numerically, were the thousands of slaves that arrived aboard

French (and foreign interloping) slave ships (negriers) from the coast of West and West-

Central Africa. Highland regions like the Grande-Anse that had once been the home

primarily of maroons, free colored smallholders, and feral pigs became by 1789 the

fastest growing sector of the colony's economy, far surpassing the sugar complex in its

rate of growth.

The significant changes that coffee fostered brought great change to society in the

Grande-Anse. The present study intends to assess some of these changes through an

examination of documentary sources on life in this region in the 1780s, a period in which

the coffee boom was well underway but before the French Revolution impacted the

colony.

2 discuss trade and population estimates in greater detail in Chapter 1, below. This brief exposition is
meant to be present a general vision of the effect of the coffee boom on society.









The first issue to consider is the changes that the coffee boom promoted in

economic relationships and land usage. At a very general level, the volume of shipping

visiting Jeremie quadrupled in only a few years. This increase reflects more ships calling

at Jeremie to engage in both trans-Atlantic commerce and the coasting trade cabotagee).

The boom in population that echoed the boom in coffee production yielded a six-fold

increase in the free population and nearly an eight-fold increase in the slave population

between 1751 and 1789. Landholders both sold out to newcomers as land prices rose and

engaged in virulent speculation. In many cases, landholders exchanged slaves for

marginal land what had always been a capital-scarce economy.

The second issue is the great increase in the slave population in the Grande-Anse

from a little over 2,000 individuals in 1751 to a round 17,000 in 1789 by official

estimates. Taking into consideration slave mortality during and after the seasoning

process, many more than 15,000 arrived through Jeremie, smaller ports, or, less likely,

overland from other parts of Saint-Domingue. Lacking data on the slave trade and other

striking aspects of slavery such as marronage, I constrained myself instead to an

examination of the material conditions that slaves faced in that Grande-Anse such as diet,

housing, and labor. Included in this analysis are those aspects of slave social organization

that can be derived from plantation inventories, namely work specialization and

maternity. In doing so, I have tried to engage with the scholarship on slave life,

specifically in late eighteenth-century Saint-Domingue. David P. Geggus's articles on

sugar and coffee in particular have proven useful to my analysis of coffee production in

the Grande-Anse. Geggus and Michael Craton's analyses of plantation slave labor in the

French and British Caribbean, respectively, have shown me how to analyze slave lists










quantitatively. For matters relative to the slave family, I have drawn methodological

inspiration from B. W. Higman's Slave Populations of the British Caribbean, 1807-1834,

and my brief discussion of slave disease and nutrition draws from Kenneth F. Kiple's The

Caribbean Slave: A Biological History. Finally, I have drawn general conclusions about

slave life in Saint-Domingue from Gabriel Debien's studies of the French Caribbean that

culminated in his Les esclaves aux Antilles franCaises.3

The final locus of my analysis is the free population, both white and colored. There

is no better place to begin than Mederic-Louis-Elie Moreau de Saint-Mery's voluminous

Description topographique, physique, civil, politique et historique de la parties francaise

de l'isle Saint-Domingue, one colonial subject's portrayal of France's most important

American possession on the eve of the revolution. Part of the attraction of Moreau's work

is that it contains all the biases of a member of the white upper class. Although his

primary purpose was to write a natural history of Saint-Domingue for the colonial

scientific society, he also discusses Enlightenment-era pseudo-scientific racism, the

Atlantic slave trade, and slave culture in tantalizing detail.4

In 1982, Michel-Rolph Trouillot made open the way to more modern analyses of

Saint-Domingue's free people of color by synthesizing the available printed primary and

secondary literature in his article "Motion in the System: Coffee, Color, and Slavery in


3David P. Geggus, "Sugar and Coffee Cultivation in Saint Domingue and the Shaping of the Slave Labor
Force," in Ira Berlin and Philip D. Morgan, eds., Cultivation and Culture: Labor and the \1-i,,i of Slave
Life in the Americas (Charlottesville: University Press of Virginia, 1993); Michael Craton, Empire,
Enslavement and Freedom in the Caribbean (Kingston: Randle Publishers, 1997); B. W. Higman, Slave
Populations of the British Caribbean, 1807-1834 (Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press, 1984),
364-73; Kenneth F. Kiple, The Caribbean Slave: A Biological History (Cambridge: Cambridge University
Press, 1984).

4Mederic-Louis-Elie Moreau de Saint-MWry, Description topographique, physique, civil, politique et
historique de la parties frangaise de 1'isle Saint-Domingue, edited by Blanche Maurel and Etienne
Taillemitte (3 vols; Paris: Soci&te de L'Histoire des Colonies Francaises, 1958).









Eighteenth-Century Saint-Domingue." In his analysis of the people of color, Trouillot

integrated the top-down approach of world systems theory with a bottom-up perspective

that took into consideration the historical agency of individuals in the colony. He

concluded that demands for coffee in the core areas of the world system allowed a

middling class of coffee planters to arise to meet that need.5

Two major treatments of the socioeconomic rise of Saint-Domingue's free coloreds

have come forward since Trouillot's seminal work. In 1988, John Garrigus completed his

dissertation at Johns Hopkins University entitled "A Struggle for Respect: The Free

Coloreds of Saint Domingue, 1770-1779," in which he examined the rise of the Raimond

family of the South Province using previously untapped notarial documents. Garrigus's

remains the best analysis to date on the colony's free people of color. Based on his

analysis of notarized documents from several southern parishes, he challenges Trouillot's

contention that coffee brought great wealth to free coloreds. Garrigus found no great

increase in free colored wealth through the exploitation of coffee plantations. The free

colored elites whom he studied invested instead in indigo cultivation and received great

returns through contraband with Dutch and German merchant houses.6

In 2001, Stewart R. King published the second major examination of the prosperity

of the free coloreds with his book Blue Coat or Powdered Wig: Free People of Color in

Pre-Revolutionary Saint Domingue. King argues extensively but not convincingly for a


5Michel-Rolph Trouillot, "Motion in the System: Coffee, Color, and Slavery in Eighteenth-Century Saint-
Domingue," Review 8 (Winter 1982): 331-88; and Trouillot, "Coffee Planters and Coffee Slaves in the
Antilles: The Impact of a Secondary Crop," in Ira Berlin and Philip D. Morgan, eds., Cultivation and
Culture: Labor and the wipt,, i of Slave Life in the Americas (Charlottesville: University Press of Virginia,
1993): 124-37.

6 John D. Garrigus, "A Struggle for Respect: The Free Coloreds of Saint Domingue, 1770-1779" (Ph.D.
diss., Johns Hopkins University, 1989).









typology dividing economically prominent free coloreds into a "military elite" and a

"planter elite." In effect, his typology imposes on colonial Saint-Domingue what was a

reality only in late revolutionary and postcolonial Haiti: a black military elite, drawn

largely from the slave elite, and a mulatto planter elite that continued their role as planters

in late colonial society.7

My analysis of the people of color in the vicinity of Jeremie is intended in part as a

critique of Blue Coat or Powdered Wig. Through my examination of the Grande-Anse

before the spread of the revolution, I seek to establish the types of personal relationships

and economic roles held by free coloreds and whites in the coffee frontier. I avoid

making restrictive models and instead describe the activities of some of the most

prominent families of both races, using such documentation as marriage contracts,

testaments, donations, and baptismal entries to reconstruct kinship and pseudo-kinship

networks that proved so important in Jeremien society. Like King and Garrigus, however,

my study contributes to the historiography of the Haitian Revolution by establishing the

socioeconomic background of free coloreds who joined others like them to appeal for the

civil rights of free non-whites in the French Atlantic world.

In order to document socioeconomic conditions in this isolated settlement, I

utilized the Jeremie Papers, a manuscript collection held by the Department of Area and

Special Collections of the University of Florida libraries. This collection of

approximately six thousand documents consists of some five thousand notarized

instruments as well as a number of ecclesiastical and civil registers. Because the

fragmentary civil court registers did not yield much useful historical data for the 1780s, I

Stewart R. King, Blue Coat or Powdered Wig: Free People of Color in Pre-Revolutionary Saint
Domingue (Athens: University of Georgia Press, 2001).









have instead relied almost entirely on the notarial papers. The latter have yielded a great

deal of detail about the lives of rural landowners habitantss), urban dwellers, and slaves. I

have focused largely on the papers of three notaries: maitre8 Thomas (1787-1793), maitre

Girard (1780-1792), and L'Epine (1780-1792), amounting to approximately 800

documents, while also consulting the ecclesiastical register for 1781, the only one falling

within the parameters of this study extant in its entirety in the Jeremie Papers. Given what

these sources can tell us, I have chosen to focus on the coffee plantations and the slaves

who worked them in the 1780s, while not neglecting what I have discovered about life in

what appear to be two of the other major sectors of the Grande-Anse's population: the

urban areas (of which the town of Jeremie was the largest) and the smallholders who

grew plantains and manioc in marginal rural areas.

I hope that this study proves useful to the debates on slave demography and free

colored social organization. Although my sample sizes are small, my analysis of these

issues is the first for the Grande-Anse, whose colonial period has not been studied since

Moreau de Saint-Mery published his Description ... de lapartiefranyaise.
















Maitre was the proper title of address to notaries, surveyors, and some other public functionaries. The
personal name of maitre Thomas was Paul-Francois-Charles. The personal names of the other two notaries
are unknown.















CHAPTER 2
GOVERNANCE, ECONOMY, AND SOCIETY

The coffee boom of the late eighteenth century brought a period of phenomenal

growth in economic activity to highland regions of Saint-Domingue that had previously

been of marginal importance. Rapid economic growth encouraged a rapid increase in

population. Everywhere the free colored population grew the fastest. On the eve of the

French Revolution, the population of the parish of Jermie represented roughly 2,000

(20%) of the whites, 1,000 (10%) of the free coloreds, and over 18,000 (about 21%) of

the slaves in the South Province. At that time, about 30,000 resident whites, perhaps

30,000 free coloreds, and close to half a million slaves were in the entire colony (see

Table 2-1). In 1788, the town of Jermie exported 6.5% of the 68 million pounds of

coffee that legally entered the international market from Saint-Domingue, then the

world's largest producer of that commodity.1 Finally, Jeremie contributed nearly 2.6% of

the royal customs duties collected in the colony that year. Despite the relative

insignificance of Jermie's fiscal, commercial, and demographic weight relative to other

regions of Saint-Domingue, it is significant to understanding the history of that colony

because its rapid growth rate during the expansion of coffee cultivation in the 1770s and




1This calculation (2.6%) does not reflect the coffee that left the Grande-Anse aboard coasting vessels
bound either for other ports in the colony or to other colonies (e.g., Jamaica). Suggestive of how great the
undercounting was are the customs records kept during the British occupation of the region (1793-1798).
According to what David Geggus relates, the Grande-Anse exported nearly 16 million pounds of coffee in
1794 and nearly 17 million the following year. These latter figures amount to 3.6 and 3.8 times the tonnage
of coffee exported from the region five years before. David Patrick Geggus, Slavery, War and Revolution:
The British Occupation ofSaint Domingue, 1793-1798 (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1982), 402.










1780s and its peculiar position as the unique stronghold of white supremacy during much

of the revolutionary 1790s.

Table 2-1. Population Increase in the Parish of Jeremie
Year Whites Libres Free Slave Total
Population Population2
1751 387 109 496 2,147 2,643
1788 2,000 1,000 3,000 18,774 20,000
Increase 1613 891 2504 14,853 17357
% 516.79 917.43 604.84 791.80 756.71
Source: Census data cited in Moreau de Saint-Mery, Description ... de la parties
francaise, 3: 1400-1401.


Geographical Overview

Under the ancien regime, the French Crown divided Saint-Domingue into three

provinces, orparties, named the North, the West, and the South. Twelve major towns that

served commercial, social, administrative, and religious functions dotted the coast of the

colony. In the North, the major urban center was Cap Francais, also known as Le Cap,

which was also the commercial capital of the colony. It was also the center of Saint-

Domingue's cultural life and was a veritable city of stone akin in size and function to a

metropolitan provincial capital. In the West was the official colonial capital at Port-au-

Prince, a much younger and less developed town than Le Cap. Although the economy of

Jeremie remained bound to these two ports, by 1788 it had attracted some trans-Atlantic

3
commerce.


2 Contemporaries disagreed on the size of Saint-Domingue's slave population. In Table 2-1, I relied on the
figures Moreau de Saint-Mery gives in his Description ... de la partiefrangaise, except for the slave
population, for which I turned to those Intendant Francois Barb6-Marbois listed in his Etat des finances de
Saint Domingue (Paris, 1790). I preferred the latter because he gave exact figures, not round numbers as
Moreau did.

For the sake of clarity, I will refer to the principal town as Jer6mie and its jurisdiction as the Grande-
Anse. Jerdmien will likewise be the adjective applied to things of the Grande-Anse and particularly of
Jer6mie. Although it has an interesting history of its own, I neglect Cap Dame Marie in this study in favor
of its more developed neighbor to the east. On Jer6mie's trade with Le Cap and Port-au-Prince, see
Moreau, Description... de la partiefrangaise, 3: 1385. On the primacy of the latter two ports in the










The second level of administration in the colony was the quarter (quarter), a

political department that included two or more parishes, which were both civil and

ecclesiastical divisions. The quarter de la Grande-Anse encompassed the northwestern

tip of present-day Haiti's southern peninsula and encompassed two parishes, which were

both ecclesiastical and civil territorial divisions. The boundaries of the quarter were the

sea to the north and west, mountains to the south, and, beyond dense forests, the quarter

du Petit-Trou de Nippes to the east. The physical isolation of the Grande-Anse made

water-borne transport of great importance to the colonists for long-range travel. The

small herds of horses and mules on most plantations belie the importance of beasts of

burden for short-range transport, such as shipping coffee to market.4

Of the two parishes in the Grande-Anse, that of Jeremie had a greater role in the

coffee boom and experienced a much greater increase in population in the latter half of

the eighteenth century. The western division, Cap Dame Marie, was less developed and

less populous in the 1780s, having only "650 whites, 220 freedmen (affranchis), and

about 4,500 slaves," at the end of the decade.5 The boundary between Cap Dame Marie

and Jeremie was L'Anse a Clerc, a point from which one could follow the road east to the

bourg (small town) of Trou Bonbon, which in the late 1780s had 15 houses-one of them

was a billiard hall-and a private cemetery. The town of Jeremie lay three leagues further


economic life of the colony, see David P. Geggus, "The Major Port Towns of Saint Domingue in the Later
Eighteenth Century," in Franklin W. Knight and Peggy K. Liss, eds., Atlantic Port Cities: Economy,
Culture, and Society in the Atlantic World, 1650-1850 (Knoxville: University of Tennessee Press, 1991),
esp. 89-96. J6r6mien merchants tended to send their coffee, cotton, sugar, and indigo to Le Cap and Port-
au-Prince in exchange for clothing, wheat flour, and other manufactures, rather than to the principal town in
the South, Les Cayes, which lay on the other side of the peninsula beyond high mountains.

4None of the plantation inventories surveyed indicate that coffee planters had any other means of transport,
neither carts or wagons nor canoes. Moreau de Saint-M6ry, Description ... de la partiefrangaise, 1: 1375

5 Ibid., 3: 1373.









east. East of Jeremie, from west to east, were the cantons (districts) of La Guinaudee, La

Voldrogue, La Grande-Riviere, and Les Roseaux, each named for the river that passed

through it. Located between the mouths of the River Voldrogue and the Grande-Riviere,

Le Vieux Bourg, the original site of settlement before Jeremie became the region' s

principal urban area.6 Further east past Les Roseaux was the bourg of Les Caimittes.

South and east of Les Caimittes were the cantons of Fond d'Icaque, Le Desert, and

Plymouth.7

The town of Jeremie was the principal urban center of the parish of Jeremie and the

locus of the Quartier de la Grande-Anse's administrative, fiscal, and ecclesiastical

structures. The royal administration maintained an aide-major and an officer de la

marine in Jeremie. These officials were charged, respectively, with defense of the quarter

and the management of finances, responsibilities roughly corresponding with those of the

governor-general and the intendant of the colony. Judicial responsibilities rested with the

sMndchaussde, a tribunal composed of the court registrar (commis greffier), the royal

attorney (procureur du Roi), and the seneschal, who embodied royal justice in his

jurisdiction. On Fridays, the seneschal heard civil and criminal cases, received memorials

on a variety of private matters, and oversaw public auctions. On Saturdays, he heard

maritime cases in his role as admiralty judge.8 The justice system employed a wide


6The royal government divided urban centers in Saint-Domingue between villes (towns) and bourgs (small
towns). Jer6mie was the only ville in the Grande-Anse, while there were several bourgs: Cap Dame Marie,
Les Abricots, Trou Bonbon, Les Caimittes, and Le Vieux Bourg.

7 Ibid., 3: 1378-79.

8 During his tenure as seneschal of Jer6mie, Elis6e Louis Demonzeuil utilized the official title of conseiller
du Roy, SneMchal Juge Civil Criminal & de police au Siege Royal de Jerdmie. M. le S6n6chal made
frequent appearances at important social events such weddings and baptisms. Petition to the S6ndchal for
Chevalier Duhaut to marry, 11 March 1779, JP-G. James E. McClellan III provides an excellent synopsis of
the royal bureaucracy in his Colonialism and Science: Saint Domingue in the Old Regime (Baltimore: The










variety of public officials, including a jailer, eight notaries, seven bailiffs, and five

attorneys.9

For his part, the officer de la marine maintained port facilities in the quarter.

Jeremie's location provided little protection for ships in the harbor and houses along its

roadstead from harsh northerly winds. Smaller vessels used for the coasting trade

(caboteurs) could moor between the roadstead and a rock in the harbor called Le Mouton,

but ships with a draught of more than 11 or 12 feet found no shelter from the wind.

Although vulnerable to the wind, ships moored at Jeremie in need of repairs could obtain

cordage, sailcloth, and other naval supplies from the royal warehouses.10

A better anchorage could be had at Les Caimites in the extreme eastern part of the

quarter, where, in 1788, 20 sloops and schooners engaged in the coasting trade with

important ports in the West: Leogane, Port-au-Prince, and Saint-Marc. From Les

Caimites, these coasters carried away coffee and indigo from the eastern cantons of

Plymouth and Fond d'Icaque. Two private wharfs operated there, including

L'Embarcadere Laurince, where a free colored woman and her white business partner

operated a warehouse for the production of plantations in its vicinity. The importance of

Les Caimites to the commerce of the eastern Grande-Anse prompted the administration to

maintain a post office and a customs officer there.11 The smaller bourgs located along the


Johns Hopkins University Press, 1992), Chapter 2. On the senechaussde, see ibid., 44.

9 Jrmie's senechaussde was smaller than those of Le Cap and Port-au-Prince and met one day a week, a
fourth as often as those in the larger towns. Moreau de Saint-Mery, Description... de la partiefrangaise,
3: 1383; Geggus, "Major Port Towns," 100; and McClellan, Colonialism and Science, 44.

1Moreau de Saint-Mery, Description ... de lapartiefrangaise, 3: 1383-84.

1At L'Embarcadere Laurince, the free colored woman Laurince dite Lachaume operated a warehouse for
local planters with the white navigator Sr. Joseph Pjac. On the proprietors of L'Embarcadere Laurince,
see L6A-141escription of the Grande-Anse's port facilities, see his Description, 3:
see JP-N. For Moreau's description of the Grande-Anse's port facilities, see his Description, 3:









coast appear to have been transshipment points from which small watercraft brought

plantation produce to Jeremie, as well as points of departure for vessels engaged in the

coasting trade, both legal and contraband.

Since its official founding in 1756, Jeremie experienced rapid urban development.

Though the number of domiciles only increased to 80 in the four years after 1765, as the

coffee boom drew more immigrants, the number of houses jumped to 125 by 1783 and

180 by 1788. The high level of rents paid on urban property in Jeremie-higher than in

the capital-also suggests rapid urban development (Figure 2-1). The town was divided

into two parts. The first part, La Basse-Ville, was made up of one major street, La Rue

Basse de la Marine, which ran west to east along the roadstead. Merchants and traders

arriving from French metropolitan and Caribbean ports rented small houses along the

roadstead that served as residence, warehouse, and, in the case of slave traders, slave-

pens. In 1788, 70 houses occupied the 69 town lots (emplacements) in the lower half of

the town. Because of the constant arrivals and departures of traders, the lease of urban

property became a lucrative business, as did the operation of inns and taverns.12 One local

entrepreneur, S. Agostino Viale, bought up much property in this quarter of town,

including one structure with five bedrooms, whose former owner, an innkeeper, included

a family of four slaves and a billiard table in the deal.13



1383-84, 1400.

12 Moreau noticed that in 1788 rents had tripled in ten years' time. Moreau de Saint-Mery, Description...
de lapartiefrangaise, 3: 1380, 1383.

1On this property in particular, see Sale of maison, negres, etc. from Sr. Francois L'Epine dit
Francisquain to Sr. Agustin Viall6 [sic], 20 May 1783, L6A-59, JP-N. See also Sale of town lot from Mr.
Augustin Hermitte to Sr. Augustin Viall6 [sic], 16 December 1785, L6A-145, ibid. For sales of adjacent
properties mentioning Viale's proprietorship, see 1 December 1786, G5-109A, ibid.; and 16 June 1787,
L6B-100. Another owner of an inn, Sr. Antoine Pradel took on a white cook as his partner in September
1787. Their contract reveals how one inn looked in Jer6mie. Pradel put up 4601 livres worth of furnishings,


















% i"", --- Jeremie







1765 1769 1783 1788
Year



Figure 2-1. Urban Development in Jeremie, 1765-1788

Establishments in the service sector like that of Viale attended to the needs of

merchants and others passing through the port on business. Trading houses and individual

merchants who worked locally owned or rented their own urban property, as is indicated

by the accounts of Jeremien merchants, especially those whose creditors left a sufficient

paper trail. One of those most prominent in the notarial archives was the house of Griolet,

Bastide & Compagnie. Like slave trader Pierre Toiry, they were local merchants without

any clear ties to metropolitan merchant houses. The company sold imported goods to

smallholders, planters, and smaller merchants in the outlying districts and facilitated the

export of coffee and other commodities produced locally in return. The death of Griolet

provoked the sudden descent of creditors upon the firm's headquarters in Jeremie, and the






a fourth of which value was his billiard table, its twelve cues, and balls. Suggestive of the scope of Pradel's
business, or maybe an indicator of his optimism, he brought place settings, liquor glasses, and small mirrors
sufficient for 24 lodgers, in addition to large stores of white and red wine and a cow, presumably for fresh
milk.Partnership between Pradel and Magud, 29 September 1787, M1-19, JP-N.









resulting appraisal of its many debts and acquisitions convinced the other partners to

retire promptly to France.14

Three paths created by the erosion of water served as the only connection between

the merchant's quarter and the rest of the town. The upper town, La Haute-Ville, was

planned around a rectangular parade ground lined with elm trees on three sides. The

fourth side, which faced the sea, was left open for use as a public market where petty

traders, slaves, and rural smallholders sold their wares. Eleven streets running parallel to

the parade ground's short side intersected six others at right angles. Despite this careful

planning, the unpaved streets of La Haute-Ville filled with choking dust in dry weather,

and wet weather reduced them to muddy expanses that threatened the stability of the elm

trees planted along their edges.15

Another problem was the nearly total lack of public buildings in Jeremie. The

sMndchaussde and admiralty court met in a house owned by the Crown. There was no

church, either. The parish instead rented a private house for the use of worshippers and

another as a rectory on a town lot shared with the royal powder magazine.16 Perhaps more

serious was the lack of drinking water, which had to be either drawn from shallow wells

(drinking from which, Moreau de Saint-Mery, notes was a courageous act) or brought

from springs more than a league away. The Crown had promised a public fountain to be

placed in the middle of the parade ground since the townspeople demanded one in 1764,



14Griolet, Bastide & Compagnie owned a house on the roadstead in Le Vieux Bourg and had commercial
contacts with a merchant residing at the bourg of Trou Bonbon. Settlement of accounts, 29 June 1790, Ml-
89.

Moreau de Saint-Mery, Description ... de lapartiefrangaise, 3: 1380-81.

16 Ibid., 3: 1380-86.










but the pipes necessary for its construction did not arrive before the outbreak of the

revolution.17

Society

In the 1780s, Grande-Anse society exhibited the three tiers characteristic of slave

societies in the Caribbean. At the top, elite whites, or grands blancs, owned the grandest

plantations and controlled international commerce and royal administrative and judicial

offices. Poor whites, orpetits blancs, often immigrants from France and other parts of

Europe, occupied many different economic roles, as artisans, storekeepers, sailors, and

plantation managers. Though it is not clear how most small and middling coffee planters

accumulated the capital with which to establish their plantations, some European-born

artisans formed partnerships to run coffee estates, and young men of color sometimes

followed a similar strategy.18 At the bottom, a largely African-born slave population

worked primarily as field slaves on coffee, cacao, cotton, sugar, indigo, and mixed-crop

plantations.19 Some had more prestigious jobs, most of which were reserved exclusively

for men: as commanders (slave drivers), artisans, sailors, and domestic and personal

servants in masters' households both in town and in the countryside. Finally, the middle

stratum, free people of color (gens de couleur libres) filled many of the same economic



17 Ibid., 3: 1381.
18
SThe progenitor of the Descoufler family (who changed their name to "Lescouflaire" in the mid-1780s),
for instance, arrived before the coffee boom and worked as a petty trader (marchand) until his death in the
late 1780s. His son Antoine became a trader like his father and Francois became a baker, but Nicolas
Lescouflaire sold a coasting vessel in 1785, acquired a coffee plantation at Trou Bonbon, and subsequently
married into the Brisson family, which included as its members coffee planters and the owner of a coasting
vessel. Donation of real estate, 31 August 1792, M1-6; sale of a balaon, 8 March 1785, L6A-99; and
Marriage contract, 15 July 1785, G5-99.

19 As I use it here and hereafter, "mixed-crop plantations" were rural units of production that grew coffee
and some other cash crops, usually cacao and/or cotton.









roles as the petits blancs. As a general rule, those of lightest complexion had a better

chance of owning small coffee or coffee-and-cacao plantations than muldtres libres (free

mulattoes), who tended to be artisans. Free black men appear less often as coffee planters

than free coloreds. They predominated the local police force, though some also owned

market gardens.

As was the case in other regions of Saint-Domingue not involved in sugar

production, the coffee boom of the 1770s and 1780s facilitated great social and economic

change in the Grande-Anse. It is important to note that unlike their counterparts in other

marginal quarters of the colony, free coloreds in the Grande-Anse did not become

numerically predominant. Rather, the majority of the free population was considered

white in the 1750s, and the same was true in the 1780s. While most of the free people of

color were of mixed African and European descent, a sample of eighteen of Jeremie's

105 cafeteries indicates that the vast majority of slaves (98.5%) on these plantations

(N=602) were black.20

Taken together, the three strata grew by a factor of over 7.5 in 38 years (see Table

2-1), with the greatest growth among the free coloreds (917.43%), followed by the slaves

(756.71%). After the Seven Years' War, both rich and poor immigrants flooded Saint-

Domingue from France's Atlantic ports and, to a lesser extent, Canada and Louisiana. At

the same time, the free people of color became more numerous through natural increase,

the manumission of slaves, and official reclassification.21


2For further discussion of Jeremie's slave population, see Chapter 2, below.

2Charles Frostin, Les revoltes blanches a Saint-Domingue auxXVIIe etXVIIIe siecles (Paris: L'Ecole,
1975), Chapter 6. For a discussion of the immigration from Louisiana to Cap Francais, see Julia Carpenter
Frederick, "Luis de Unzaga and Bourbon Reform in Spanish Louisiana, 1770-1776" (Ph.D. diss., Louisiana
State University, 2000), 104-106.









During the seventeenth and much of the eighteenth century, persons of African

descent did not face any significant discrimination based on their ancestry. In his 1685

slave code written for French colonies overseas, the Code Noir, Louis XIV divided his

colonial subjects into two juridical categories, slave and free, and John Garrigus's

research on the Raimond family confirms in part that this was true. Following the Seven

Years' War, however, the Crown took certain measures to limit the ambitions of free

people of color. The royal government began to redefine persons of African descent as a

caste apart from the rest of free society. Hommes de couleur libres (free men of color)

could no longer serve as commissioned officers in the colonial militia, and, beginning in

the 1780s, people of color were denied usage of honorific titles such as Monsieur and

Madame in official paperwork such as ecclesiastical records and notarized bills of sale.22

As Charles Frostin argues, in the early to mid-eighteenth century, white immigrants

to Saint-Domingue became plantation owners by managing an absentee planter's estate

and embezzling enough to start their own plantations. In the last half of the century,

however, the flood of immigrants arriving each year glutted the free labor market,

making it more difficult for small whites to find a job in the first place. In the case of the

Grande-Anse, petits blancs had to compete not only with one another but also with

colored artisans already established in the building trades.

In the face of increasing discrimination against them, people of color worked out

ways to improve their position in free society. Stewart R. King has recently argued that

some men of color (in his words, a "military elite") continued to use military service as a

unifying principle while others forming a "planter elite" kept close personal and


22 Frostin, Les revoltes blanches, Chapter 6.









commercial ties with white society.23 In her work Dominque Rogers has stressed that free

coloreds established formal relationships with whites such as apprenticeships and

business contracts while usually marrying persons of their own phenotype.24

Considering these recent developments in the historiography, it is necessary to

compare race relations in the Grande-Anse with those described by Rogers and King,

both of whom studied the North and West. Unlike in King's typology, the Quartier de la

Grande-Anse generated no "military elite," but members of a small free colored "planter

elite" did have commercial and personal ties with whites. Some free colored women had

business relationships with lower-class white men either formalized through notarized

contracts or kept as informal, oral agreements. The most common arrangement of this

sort was for a free woman of color to be the housekeeper of a white planter, though in

some cases free colored women operated urban businesses with white male partners.

Contractual relationships involving free colored men and whites were only short-term

affairs, most notably building contracts between muldtre carpenters and white

landowners. What Rogers has found to be true for Le Cap and Port-au-Prince was also

the case in Jeremie. There free coloreds formed business partnerships and did often live

under the same roof with whites. Small coffee planters had similar relationships with

people of color, with whom they bought and sold land. Small whites also often kept

colored women as menageres ("housekeepers"), whom they rarely married but to whose

children they often gave tacit recognition of paternity (see Chapter 4).



23Stewart R. King, Blue Coat or Powdered Wig.

24She found that the rate at which free coloreds took spouses of their phenotype was 80% in Le Cap and
70% in Port-au-Prince. Dominique Rogers, "De l'origine du pr6jug6 de couleur en Haiti," Outre-Mers 90,
no. 340-341 (2003): 97-100.









Part of the Crown's response to the rise in population in Jeremie and elsewhere in

Saint-Domingue was a desire for greater official policing power to keep the thousands of

new residents in line, in particular the multitudes of slaves arriving every year from

Africa. Under the authority of the seneschal, the martchausse, the rural mounted police

force composed primarily of free blacks, hunted for maroon slaves and kept order in the

countryside. The martchausste also incorporated some slaves, whose masters received in

return for this public service a dispensation from the liberty tax charged for

manumissions. In Jeremie, the administrative structure of the martchausste consisted of

a white officer (exempt), a colored non-commissioned officer (brigadier), and four free

black rank-and-file (archers).25

Table 2-2. Militia Enrollment by Race, 1751-1789
Year White % White Libre % % of All Whites % of All Libres
Militia Militia Libre Serving in Militia Serving in
Militia
1751 159 85.03 28 14.97 41.09 25.69
1765 168 67.47 81 32.53 Unknown Unknown
1789 480 59.11 332 40.89 24.00 33.20
Source: Militia enlistment cited in Moreau de Saint MWry, Description ... de la parties francaise, 3: 1400.

Militia enrollment also increased with the population boom, and the rising

proportion of free coloreds in the militia demonstrates their rising significance both as a

source of state power and as a potential threat to the social status quo. In 1751, 159

whites and 28 free coloreds served in the parish militia, the Bataillon de la Grande-Anse.

Although it is not clear what role free coloreds there played in the militia of the 1750s, in

the 1760s royal proclamations forbade the promotion of men of color above the rank of

25See Chapter 3, below, for my discussion of one such supernumerary. I have decided to maintain the
colonial phenotypical designations. Hence free blacks will be called nkgres libres" free quadroons
quarterons libres, and free octoroons mtifs libres. Similarly, I will refer to the gens de couleur libres and
free coloreds as equivalent terms. See Appendix A for further description of the racial hierarchy as
imagined in the late eighteenth century. Ibid.; and King, Blue Coat or Powdered Wig, 234.









sergeant. Grands blancs, meanwhile, held high rank in the parish militia. Prosperous

coffee planters Rene LeRoy and Simeon Ertillet Prebois both held captaincies in the

battalion, while merchant Jean Chalmette commanded the artillery company.

Unsurprisingly, one of the wealthies whites, sugar planter Sr. Hildevert Berquier, pere,

was commandant of the battalion until his death in the early 1780s.26

Economy

Based as it was on the export of plantation staples, the Jeremien economy needed

adequate shipping to carry its coffee, cotton, lumber, indigo, and cacao to larger markets.

By 1788, French ship captains had found calling at Jeremie a profitable enterprise, where

before 3 or 4 "small ships from Europe" did not find sufficient business in Jeremie to

make going there profitable. In 1788, Moreau de Saint-Mery found that eleven French

vessels and eight coasting vessels (caboteurs) arrived each year. These figures indicate

only legal commerce, however, and do not take into account the interlopers who no doubt

frequented smaller ports like Trou Bonbon and Les Caimites.27

More empirical evidence comes from official customs records of the volume of

goods exported from each of Saint-Domingue's twelve major ports. As Table 2-3

demonstrates, Jeremie legally exported 6.5% (4.5 million pounds) of the colony's coffee

and generated 1.62% of the customs duties paid to the Crown during that year, totals that

do not take into account coffee from the Grande-Anse shipped through the coasting trade

26 There was also at least one company of dragoons. Moreau de Saint-Mery, Description... de la parties
frangaise, 3: 1400-1401; baptismal records of Louise Adelaide Bonne Robinet, Jeanne Marie Petronille
LeRoy, and Francoise Kavenagh, Ecclesiastical Records, Paroisse de Saint-Louis de Jer6mie, 1781, Jer6mie
Papers; partnership agreement between Sr. Simon Stilite Prebois and dame Marie Bouch6, ibid., Notaries,
L6A-3; Partnership between Dame Veuve Berquier and her children for the exploitation of a sugar
plantation, Jer6mie, 2 March 1785, L6A-94; and Moreau de Saint-Mery, Description... de la parties
frangaise, 3: 1386.

27 Moreau de Saint-Mery, Description ... de la partiefrangaise, 3: 1383.










to other ports or smuggled out of the quarter. When compared with the other ports in the

South Province (i.e., those on the peninsula's southern coast) these percentages increase

to 40.3 and 10.98%, respectively.28 Indirect evidence also exists for a contraband trade

with Anglo-America: coffee planters quite often rode "English horses" (perhaps from the

United States) and decorated their rather humble cabins with English furniture. Their

ownership of English manufactures is only part of the evidence of an important economic

between Jamaica and the Grande-Anse. Jeremien planters and their counterparts

throughout the South had long relied on slaves from Jamaica (and Curacao as well) to

stock their plantation workforces29

Table 2-3. Summary of Property Ownership in Saint-Domingue, Listed by Major Ports
of Embarkation, 1788






SCap 168 1263 14 27 3 28 7 51 98,537
P Francais
SFort- 120 345 3 49 0 13 0 7 31,467
Dauphin
Port-de- 8 249 23 384 0 4 18 26 28,251
Paix
TOTAL 296 1857 40 460 3 45 25 84 158,255


28
2Francois Barb6-Marbois, Etat des finances de Saint-Domingue (Paris, 1790).

29 These references are taken from a score of plantation inventories contained in the Jer6mie Papers. Of the
three horses Sr. Louis Paret left upon his death, the appraisers of his estate described one as creole the
second as anglais (English), and the third as anglais batard, perhaps meaning one of mixed English and
creole parentage. Paret also owned two saddles: an old one of English make and the second a sc i ill's
saddle (selle a valet)." Succession of Sr. Louis Paret, 2 March 1786, G5-102. Charles Frostin suggests that
this tie amounted to Anglophilia in the latter half of the eighteenth century, encouraging separatist
Domingois planters to look to Jamaica for aid with the outbreak of the Revolution in the early 1790s.
Frostin, Les revoltes blanches a Saint-Domingue auxXVIIe etXVIIIe siecles (Paris: L'Ecole, 1975),
Chapter 6. In 1784, the Crown offered French slavers a bounty of 100 livres for each slave disembarked in
the South, an encouragement doubled in 1786. Jer6mie was excluded from this inducement, which was
restricted to the only the southern coast of the peninsula, which may have encouraged foreign slavers to
continue to go to the Grande-Anse. Moreau de Saint-MWry, Description... de la partiefranqaise, 3: 1166.









Table 2.3 Continued
4 Port-au- 190 240 65 385 0 43 3 48 65,303
SPrince
Saint- 43 298 315 1184 0 10 1 71 50,216
Marc
Leogane 66 58 18 78 0 25 1 14 12,896
Petit- 44 63 32 216 0 18 3 18 29,058
Godve
TOTAL 343 659 430 1863 0 96 8 15 157,473
1
O Jeremie 8 105 30 44 0 6 25 14 18,774
Cap- 2 24 12 169 0 0 4 7 7,153
STiburon
Les Cayes 110 69 76 175 0 18 2 32 27,937
Saint- 32 39 28 257 0 8 2 18 16,785
Louis
Jacmel 1 57 89 129 0 0 3 7 19,151
TOTAL 153 294 235 774 0 32 36 78 89,800
TOTALS 792 2810 705 3097 3 17 69 31 405,528
3 3
% In Jeremie 1.01 3.73 4.25 1.42 0.0 3.4 36. 4.4 4.62
0 6 23 7
Source: Francois Barb&-Marbois, Etat des finances de Saint-Domingue (Paris: 1790).

Though based largely on the cultivation of coffee, the economy of the Grande-Anse

in the 1780s also encompassed other kinds of agricultural enterprises. Its eight sucreries,

established on the small plains near the town of Jeremie, exported a total of 19,000

pounds of semi-refined sugar, or sucree terre," and 476,000 pounds of raw sugar in 1788,

while its 30 cotonneries sent 189,000 pounds of cotton to market during the same period.

Indigo was of less importance: 44 indigoteries exported a little over a thousand pounds of

the blue dye in those years, though it is necessary to note that indigo's value per unit

weight greatly exceeded that of other cash crops. Finally, though the customs records for

1788 does not even list cacao as an export category, 25 cacaotieres continued to operate

(Table 2-3). Plantation inventories from the 1780s suggest that many coffee plantations

possessed small groves of cacao trees. At least some of their produce went to local

consumption: Moreau de Saint-Mery indicates that shortages during the Seven Years'









War encouraged Jeremiens to replace imported butter with beurre de cacao, which

played an important part in local foodways thereafter. He also notes that the parish of

Jeremie and that of Cap Dame Marie respectively produced 60,000 and 120,000 pounds

of cacao in 1788. A final category unmentioned in the customs records is lumber. Moreau

de Saint-Mery indicates that Jeremiens produced a half million pounds of lumber each

year, apparently for both export abroad and through the coasting trade to other ports in

the colony as well as for local use (Table 2-5).30

Table 2-4. Export Statistics, 1788


0 0
TOTAL:NORTH 52,968 4,085 33,811 68 264 91,196 2,845
TOTAL:WEST 12,746 69,184 23,286 4,616 545 110,377 3,043
TOTAL: SOUTH 4,507 19,901 11,048 1,598 1,190 39,279 1,029
TOTAL: 70,221 93,170 68,145 6,282 1,999 240,852 6,917
COLONY
Jeremie 19 476 4,453 189 1 6,212 113
% Jeremie 0.03 0.51 6.53 0.03 1.62 2.58 1.63
Source: "ttat general des Cultures & Manufactures de Saint-Domingue," 1788-1789 in
Francois Barb6-Marbois, Etat des finances de Saint-Domingue (Paris, 1790). Exports are
expressed in thousands of pounds, while customs duties are per 1,000 livres colonials.

In addition to producing coffee, cotton, sugar, and indigo for the export market,

Jeremiens also engaged in industrial enterprises whose products were doubtless for local

consumption. According to the 1788 Etat des finances de Saint-Domingue produced by

the intendant's office in Port-au-Prince (see Table 2-3), the Grande-Anse contained six

guildiveries (rum distilleries) but legally exported no tafia (low-grade cane liquor). The








30 On the local use of cacao to substitute butter, see Moreau de Saint-Mery, Description ... de la parties
frangaise, 3: 1406. On the 1730s expansion and demise of cacao in the Grande-Anse, see ibid., 3: 1377.










production of 14 lime ovens (fours a chaux) likewise contributed to the local market as

necessary building materials necessary to the growing towns and plantations.31

Table 2-5. Annual Commodity Production in the Grande-Anse, 1788 (Thousands of
Pounds)


C 0 0
&. f 0 0 m


19 476 4,453 189 1 180 500
Sources: Customs records, 1788-1789; and Moreau
de Saint-MWry, Description... de la parties
francaise, 3: 1400. N.B.: Figures are given in units
of 1,000. Quantities refer to production in both
parishes of the Grande-Anse.

Perhaps the most studied branch of commerce is the Atlantic slave trade. In their

database on the Atlantic slave trade, David Eltis, Stephen D. Behrendt, David

Richardson, and Herbert S. Klein include a handful of French slaving voyages whose

major port of disembarkation was Jeremie (see Table 2-6).32 All of these voyages date,

however, between 1788 and 1791, a sign of the port's growing attraction to French

merchants, long after the boom in the Jeremien slave population had begun.

Transshipments within the colony and the contraband slave trade with the English

through Jamaica no doubt brought most of the slaves before the late 1780s. In all five

cases in the database, the slaving vessels unloaded most of their slaves at Jeremie.33






3Francois Barb6-Marbois, Etat des finances de Saint-Domingue (Paris, 1790).

32 The only case of coastal slave trading that I have discovered in the notarial archive involved a Sieur
Lacluse of Cap Francais, the colony's major entrep6t, who consigned two slaves, both "of the Congo
nation," to sieur Antoine Belisoli, a caboteur whom he directed to sell in Jer6mie. Power of attorney from
Sieur Lacluse to Sr. Antoine Belisoli, 4 June 1788, M1-48, Jer6mie Papers.

3David Eltis, Stephen D. Behrendt, David Richardson, and Herbert S. Klein, eds., The Trans-Atlantic
Slave Trade: A Database on CD-ROM (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999).









Table 2-6. Sample of Slaving Vessels Calling at Jeremie, 1788-1791








Deux Saint- 0






Source: David Eltis, Stephen D. Behrendt, David Richardson, and Herbert S. Klein,
eds., The Trans-Atlantic Slave Trade: A Database on CD-ROM (Cambridge:
Cambridge University Press, 1999).C



Whether their human cargo was legal or not, it seems slave ship captains used local
Vri





1merchans a ants o isrir bo les, o loca




17 Customers. If the al documents are ngolan Cap inrdication J. Pierre Tomie foremost





local slave dealer. He apparently did quite well in the market for human bodies: he owned
at least on1791e Amouse oant Rue Basse de la Marine in Jeremie, a plantation at La Grande339



1791Riviere, and a half share in a plantation at Riviere Froide. He ran out of luck in 1787,

Sourcwhen he declareavid Etis, Stephat he owned over 40,000 livres to Jean and Huguerbert S. Klein,
Cambridge University Press, 1999).

Whether their human cargo was legal or not, it seems slave ship captains used local

merchants as their agents to distribute newly arrived slaves, or bossales, to local

customers. If the notarial documents are any indication, Sr. Pierre Toiry was the foremost

local slave dealer. He apparently did quite well in the market for human bodies: he owned

at least one house on Rue Basse de la Marine in Jarmie, a plantation at La Grande

Riviere, and a half share in a plantation at Riviere Froide. He ran out of luck in 1787,

when he declared that he owned over 40,000 livres to Jean and Hugues McLean,

merchants based in Kingston, Jamaica. Toiry had a series of notarial acts passed in quick

succession in an effort to free up enough capital to keep his solvency. The officials of the

sMnechaussee treated Toiry's debt to the McLeans as nothing out of the ordinary,

suggesting that the contraband slave trade with Jamaica received the tacit approval of the

local government.34



4 Though it would appear that commercial connections between Jr6mie and Kingston would have been









Bossales, slaves recently arrived in the colony from Africa, acted as an important

means of exchange in the local economy. Notarized sales of land reveal how key bossales

are to understanding how small proprietors accumulated capital. Although the sellers of

small parcels of land sometimes demanded payment in "money of Spain or Portugal

current in the colony" and quite often accepted bills of exchange, some demanded that

buyers give them bossales for land. In September 1786, Antoine Alger, negre libre,

promised to sell a habitation at les Roseaux to Sr. Pierre Malvin de Beuns, habitant at

Fond Rouges, in barter for two bossales from Sr. Pierre Toiry. In such transactions, Toiry

was the only slave trader ever mentioned. The sources do not allow us to say whether he

was the only slave merchant in Jeremie, but perhaps he was the one best known to

habitants in the outlying cantons.35

Some evidence also exists for an internal economy in the Grande-Anse. Small

farmers living on the margins of the export economy sold their produce to the towns.

Planters also bought their plantains and manioc to supplement the food already grown by

the slaves themselves on common plots. Small proprietors-free coloreds who had not

sold their land to white planting interests-appear to have supplied many of the

nutritional needs of the new coffee economy.36

In the 1770s and 1780s, as immigrants arrived from western and southern France,

Martinique, and other parts of Saint-Domingue, the wealthier searching for land and the

considered contraband trade, the local administrators did not find it odd, and the royal attorney in Jer6mie
made it clear that Toiry would be required to pay his debts. The whole matter has a feeling of business as
usual. For Toiry's insolvency, see documents in L'Epine's papers for June 1787, especially Recognizance
of debt by Sr. Pierre Toiry to the M.cLeans of Kingston, 16 June 1787, L6B-97.

35See, for example, the sale of land in L6B-38, JP-N.

36Gabriel Debien, Les esclaves aux Antillesfranqaises au XVIIe-XVIIIe siecles (Basse-Terre: Soci&te
d'Histoire de la Guadeloupe, 1974), Chapter 11.









poor for employment (see Table 2-7), the governor and intendant in Port-au-Prince

granted unconceded land along the quarter's waterways to both newcomers and old

settlers. Although royal land regulations mandated that grantees hold and improve their

concessions for at least five years, many sold their new land well before that time.37

Table 2-7. Immigrants to the Grande-Anse, 1780-178938
Year39 Name Phenotype/Legal Place of Country40 Occupation
Birth
1781 Catherine White creole? Martinique Fr.
Barbo Antilles
1781 Ursule European Anjou France
Vallee
1781 Barthelemi European Bordeaux France Habitant
Martel
1781 Dominique European Bordeaux France
Bouny
1781 Mathurin European Bretagne France Master
Vincent saddler
Renaud
1781 Jean European Gascony France Master
Narbonne surgeon
1781 Jean European Languedoc France Habitant
Mathieu
Videt de
Nartigues
1781 Mathieu European Limoges France Storekeeper
Bourbon
1781 Jean European Lyons France Town jailer
Baptiste
Perret



3In one case, an informant instigated an investigation by the royal attorney against merchant Claude Asti6
for not developing a concession of land at Nouvelle Plymouth. See JP-N 2-52 for documentation of this
case.

38I have excluded military personnel and prisoners of war who were in Jer6mie during the U.S. War for
Independence as temporary residents.

3Year indicates the earliest year known, from documents in the Jer6mie Papers.

40 "P. du Sud," "P. du Nord," and "Partie de l'Ouest" are equivalent to the South, North, and West
Provinces, respectively.









Table 2-7 Continued
1781 Pierre
Bruet
Moche
1781 Jean
Magloire
Carbasio
1781 Marie Rose
Boncy
1781 Marie
Therese
Longchant
1781 Rose
Elizabeth
Martel de
Belle
Roche
1782 Claude
FranCois
Adee
1782 Marie
Magdeleine
LeBeau
1782 Etienne
Tessier
1786 Jean
Baptiste ..
Bazile dit
Estienne
1786 Genevieve
Lezeau
1787 Joseph
FranCois
Vezier des
Ombrages
1788 Elie Louis
Fournier
1788 Paul dit
Guinney
1789 Pierre
Augustin
Rose de la
Rue


European


Mulatre
affranchi

Muldtresse
ingenue
Ingenu


White creole?





Negre affranchi


European


Ingenu

Mulatre libre



White Creole

European



European

Mulatre libre

European


Savoy


Fort
Dauphin

Port-de-
Paix
Cavaillon


Italy


Saint-
Domingue

Saint-
Domingue
Saint-
Domingue


Habitant


Cavalier


L'Anse a Saint-
Veau Domingue


Martinique


LaRochelle


L'Anse a
Veau
Leogane



Aquin

Poitou



Angoumois

Quarter
Morin
Poitou


Fr. Archer de
Antilles police

France


Saint-
Domingue
Saint-
Domingue


Saint-
Domingue
France



France

Saint-
Domingue
France


Smallholder/
mail carrier
Habitant



Habitante

Interim
maj or-
commandant

Notary

Tailor

Merchant in
Jeremie


Source: Jkr6mie Papers, Notaries Thomas, L'Epine, and Girard; and ibid., Greffe, Ecclesiastical
Records, 1781.










Moreau de Saint-Mery notes in his Description ... de lapartiefrancaise that free

coloreds owned most of the land in the Grande-Anse prior to the coffee boom but sold

out to whites once land prices rose.41 Notarial documents I have consulted do suggest that

free coloreds were selling their land to free up capital they needed for other pursuits or

because of poor luck as coffee planters, but they do not indicate as strong a transferal of

land from free coloreds to whites as Moreau suggests. As he explained in his marriage

contract, Francois Lafor&t, a freeborn mtif, lost his parents' plantation and moved to

town, where he did not do much better.42 Other free coloreds needed the capital they

could get from selling their land. Sr. Jean Antoine Duleun de St. Brosse bought fifty

carreaux of land at les Roseaux from ingenu Etienne Tessier for 5000 livres in July 1782.

The record of the sale indicates that Tessier, who acquired the land in 1771, had been

cultivating 1000 banana trees, a scale of cultivation that implies he sold their yield for

public consumption. After selling his land, Tessier became the mail courier between

Jeremie and L'Anse a Veau. It appears his reason for selling his plantain farm was to

manumit his female griffe slave Anne the following year, for whose liberty he paid a

1,000 livres tax to the Crown.43


41As used in the Grande-Anse at the end of the eighteenth century, habitant (feminine habitante) denoted
anyone who owned rural property, no matter his or her phenotype or economic status. I have not been able
to establish deeper meanings to the term, but I would be interested to know how this signifier interacted
with the new language of citizenship during the periods in which the French Republic controlled the region
(1789-1791, 1794-1803). Moreau de Saint-Mery, Description ... de lapartiefrangaise, 3: 1400-1401.

42 The phenotypical designation metif(also mestif) denoted someone of one-eighth African ancestry,
usually with straight hair and fair skin. Moreau also makes racist comments on the infertility of the mitif
and his physical inferiority relative to whites. Moreau de Saint-Mery, Description... de la parties
frangaise, 1: 92. Laforet does not indicate why he lost his family's plantation, but his fiancee's refusal to
give him control over her property suggests that he was not to be trusted with money. Marriage contract
between Francois Laforet and Marie Claire Belune, 2 September 1789, M1-63, JP-N. I discuss their case in
more detail in Chapter 3, below.

43 Ingenu is a term applied to freeborn people of color. Griffe indicated someone with one black parent and
one mulatto parent. Sale of land, 6 July 1782, L6A-33AB, JP-N; and Manumission of Anne Rox6lane, grif









Although some free coloreds did quite well as coffee planters or even producers of

food crops, notarial documents indicate that free coloreds also filled many of the same

economic roles as poor white immigrants: plantation managers, artisans in the building

trades, and as secondary and primary traders. They competed with white immigrants for

skilled and semi-skilled jobs such as these and no doubt with slaves for more menial

labor. Some prospered as shop owners and occasionally, it seems, as master craftsmen. It

is impossible to say exactly how many individuals were employed in one trade or

another, but the notarial documents give the impression that many carpenters, both white

and muldtre, found employment in the booming local economy.44

Taking advantage of the boom in construction, S. Bernard Fourcand, a former

ship's carpenter who immigrated from Canada, established himself as a building

contractor: after sealing contracts with clients in Jeremie and the outlying cantons,

Fourcand contracted a team of muldtre carpenters to frame and plank planter's

residences, slave cabins, and outbuildings on plantations, as well as to make

improvements on pre-existing structures. For just such ajob, Fourcand made a contract

with the muldtres inginus Louis Tripoly and Jean Jacques Boncy to put planking on the

inside of the house of the negresse libre (free black) Martonne in Jeremie, as well as

construct jalousies and stairs to the second story. Working through a contractor like






[sic], by le nommd Etienne Tessier, 1783, L6A-56, ibid.

44Carpenter Joseph Millery made a direct contract to build the structures necessary for a new plantation.
He mentioned his own apprentices. The exact structure of skilled labor in Jer6mie is not clear, but many
free colored and white immigrants appearing in the notarial archive were carpenters, along with a few
bakers, tailors, shoemakers, and coopers. For Millery's contract, see M1-97, JP-N.









Fourcand, free colored artisans could perhaps compete against both their white and free

colored counterparts who sought out work alone.45

Planters and Plantations

As Michel-Rolph Trouillot has indicated, many first-generation coffee planters in

Saint-Domingue depended on the sugar complex for their fortunes and invested some of

their wealth in coffee. They withdrew when prices fell in the mid-1770s. The second

generation of coffee planters were in Trouillot's analysis poor whites and free coloreds

who already owned land in the mountains and who converted some of that land to coffee.

Most of the coffee planters who appear in the notarial papers from the 1780s and early

1790s that I have consulted were immigrant whites. Many of those who were free

coloreds derived their property from their white fathers, as were the case of the Lafonds

and Azors of Fond d'Icaque and the Bouchereau family of La Grande-Riviere. Free

colored coffee planters appear to have seldom requested the services of notaries to have

real estate property appraised for sale. Their lack of presence in the notarial records may

derive from a desire to avoid selling land or to do so without going through official

channels. Some of the factors discouraging free colored ownership of coffee plantations

were demographic (there were twice as many whites as free coloreds in Jeremie) and the

problem of capital accumulation.46






4For the contract on Martonne's house in Jer6mie, see Building contract, 27 November 1787, M1-32, JP-
N. For other contracts between Fourcand and muldtre carpenters, see L6B-107 (21 June 1787).

46 The mechanisms by whichpetits blancs and free coloreds could receive credit are poorly understood. I
have found no successions of free colored planters from the 1780s, though some surely exist. On free
colored coffee planters, see Trouillot, "Motion in the System," 350; Testament of Marguerite Rozaire, 24
March 1783, L6A-52; and Moreau de Saint-MWry, Description ... de lapartiefrangaise, 3: 1390-91.









Table 2-8. Slave and Landholding on 13 Coffee and Mixed-Crop Plantations in the
Grande-Anse, 1780-1792






Marcorelle 20 0 0 10 32,000 *
Vigneau 0 12 32,874 32 *
Fignoux 13 54,600 32 *
Fondelin 12 13 110,000 100 12.00
De La Rue 29 0 0 14 95,400 86 10.46
Belle Vue 25 0 0 16 63,000 63 *
Lelevain 20 0 0 16 65,026 *
Paret 11 10 0 27 103,200 75 60.00
Dangluze 12 1.2 0 32 118,410 66 63.63
Pigal 0 0 32 180,241 50 60.00
Dufour freres 70 0 12 38 160,283 83 *
Canonge & Dulaud 70 0 0 47 280,000 *
TOTALS 279 11.2 12 280 1,333,774 663.5 24.26

Inventories of 13 coffee estates from the Grande-Anse suggest that small and

middling planters had different relations to their landholdings (Table 2-8). As

postmortem inventories of their estates suggest, many small planters' slaves, land, and

buildings amounted to all of their worldly possessions. In this they differed from

middling planters, who owned between 25 and 50 slaves. Middling planters often had

prospects other than their plantations. The two partnerships included in the sample

(Dufour,frdres, and Canonge & Dulaud) were arranged so that one partner managed the

plantation while the other resided in one of the colony's major ports. Others invested

heavily in their one landholding. Finally, some small and middling planters used coffee

production to insure an income that added to their primary occupations. Dominique

Bamabe Lelevain was a master surgeon who enjoyed revenues from both medical fees

4The inventories of large plantations tended not to include descriptions of land use. I have therefore
excluded estates of that class from consideration in this section.









and the coffee his 16 slaves produced. Similarly, Marie Thereze Sauvanelle, who bought

the Fondelin plantation in 1787 jointly with her brother and sisters, operated a small store

in La Haute-Ville. Finally, some small and middling coffee planters were absentees who

lived in Jeremie and left the administration of their rural properties to managers or

business partners.48

The higher capital outlay of middling planters not only paid for more slaves but

also more advanced technology. After the slaves picked the "cherries" (ripe fruit) from

the coffee bushes, at the very least it was necessary to dry them before sending them to

market. At the least, planters could dry the cherries directly on the ground, but drying

them on platforms made of masonry produced a superior product. Once the cherries were

dry, a process that could take up to two weeks, teams of slaves took turns removing their

outer coating with grinding mills. Some planters also employed winnowing mills

thereafter to separate the coffee beans from refuse. Finally, the entire workforce sorted

the beans into grades by quality and put them into sacks. Although it is true that

becoming a coffee planter required far less capital than to become a sugar planter, the

notarial records suggest that to produce coffee well required the outlay of a hundred

thousand livres colonials or more in order to prosper at it.49

Middling planters like Sr. Jean-Baptiste Dangluze might have owned a house in

Jeremie or one of the bourgs and have family connections with captains of coasting



48Succession of Sieur Lelevain, Trou Bonbon, 7 February 1784, L6A-66, JP-N; and 14 July 1790, M1-95,
ibid.

J49 rmien coffee planters whose estates were inventoried in the 1780s did not own many books, least of
all manuals on coffee planting. Pierre-Joseph Laborie's The Coffee Planter of San Domingo gives us a
retrospective view of how one successful coffee planter in the North practiced his trade. Pierre-Joseph
Laborie, The Coffee Planter of San Domingo (London: T. Cadell and W. Davies, 1798).









vessels, but they remained a step below large planters whose families owned land in more

than one parish. The Clements, for example, were import-export merchants based at Cap

Francais and among the many northerners who had invested in Grande-Anse real estate.

The best example of Jeremien proprietors invested in both sugar and coffee exploitation,

however, is the Berquier family. Their sugar plantation located immediately east of La

Basse-Ville, greatly impressed Moreau de Saint-Mery. Compared to the crude machinery

employed by most local coffee planters, La Habitation Berquier was an engineering

marvel. The wheel of the sugar mill was powered by water drawn from its reservoir of

four carreaux supplied "from many sources"; when this supply was not enough, a

windmill drew more water up from La Grande-Riviere de la Grande-Anse. Following the

death of the family patriarch, Sr. Hildevert Berquier, pere, his widow and children

formed a partnership to run the sucrerie for five years. L 'Etat detail des liquidations,

the official report of the French Ministry of Finance's indemnifications to Domingois

property owners in the mid-nineteenth century, indicates the variety of properties owned

by the Berquiers at the time of Haitian independence (see Table 2-9). From the

nineteenth-century indemnity data it is clear that various members of the family invested

in a variety of export crops: coffee, indigo, cotton. The bulk of the family's wealth,

however, came from sugar and coffee cultivation, and like many families that can be

described as members of a planter elite, the Berquiers had property in more than one

quarter, in this case Petit-Trou de Nippes.5s



50Sr. Franqois Berquier, one of eldest sons, was to manage the property put into partnership, but his
mother, who was to live on her own property in the parish of Nippes, east of the Grande-Anse, reserved
control over the purse strings for herself. Moreau de Saint-Mery, Description ... de la partiefrangaise, 3:
1386; and Partnership to Exploit a Sugar Plantation between Widow Berquier and her children, J&r6mie, 2
March 1785.









Table 2-9. Real property Owned by the Berquier Family, ca. 1803, for which the Family
Received Compensation
Proprietor Type of property Canton Parish Value
(francs)
Marie- Coffee plantation La Voldrogue Jeremie 20,900.00
Madeleine
Berquier
Coffee plantation Fond Cochon Jeremie 103,475.32
Fleury Berquier Cotton plantation Jeremie Jeremie
Indigo plantation Nippes Petit-Trou 132,069.62
Woodland Les Baraderes Petit-Trou Id.
Sugar plantation Jeremie Jeremie Id.
TOTAL 256,444.94
Source: L'ttat des liquidations, 2: 410-411. N.B. that the indigo plantation, sugar plantation, and woodland
owned by the children and grandchildren of Hildevert Berquier, pbre, in the 1830s amounted to 132,069.62
francs in indemnities as part of one claim. Individual amounts were not provided for each property.

Many writers, both contemporary and modern, have pointed out the detrimental

effects of absenteeism on the slaves' quality of life. Debien and Frostin both provide

vignettes of managers of absentee plantations who robbed their employers in order to

enrich themselves, and slaves on these plantations suffered from a lack of food and other

rations. Pierre-Joseph Laborie, who wrote a manual on coffee cultivation during the late

1790s, suggests that coffee planters who lived on their estates were indeed paternalistic,

given the closeness and care the proximity of master and slave afforded. No doubt slaves

benefited from the closer management of their masters: the inventory of only six of the

fourteen small and middling plantations listed a slave driver, implying that either the

planter, or a member of his family, oversaw the daily work of the slaves. Paternalism is a

tempting jump to make in this case, but further evidence from planters' correspondence

and personal papers would be needed to draw this conclusion.





51Frostin, Les rovoltes blanches, Chapter 6; Debien, Les esclaves, Chapter 11; Trouillot, "Motion in the
System," 380; and Laborie, San Domingo Coffee Planter.









Conclusions

The Grande-Anse on the eve of the French Revolution was a locus of coffee

production for export to French ports and from there to the supply the rest of the world-

system. At the same time, Jeremie experienced migration from France's Atlantic ports

(particularly Bordeaux) and the French West Indies during the last quarter of the

eighteenth century. While newcomers with capital or credit enough to do so established

themselves as coffee planters and import-export merchants, the poor filled roles as

artisans, plantation managers, and petty traders, roles for which they competed with

people of color. Those who did acquire land often lacked the means to exploit their

resources fully. Turning from the growing free population, the next chapter examines a

sample of the African slaves imported into the Grande-Anse during the last half of the

eighteenth century.
















CHAPTER 3
PLANTATION SLAVERY IN THE GRANDE-ANSE

The written records available on slavery in the Grande-Anse in the 1780s tell us

different things about slaves than they do about the free population. Whereas they

provide some room to interpret the thoughts and actions of the variegated members of the

free population, notarial documents present slaves as merchandise, in lists of names,

ethnicities, ages, and personal characteristics like occupational skills and physical

deformities. At the same time, the commoditization of this stratum of the human

population does present some advantages, the greatest of which is a set of qualities that

can be analyzed using quantitative methods. This chapter will do just that. Because of the

nature of the sources, it is largely an analysis of the physical conditions of slavery:

housing, diet, and family structure.1





1The plantation inventories that are sources for my analysis in this chapter come exclusively from the
Jer6mie Papers. These sources, all from the notary series of that collection, are: Succession of Sr. Joseph
Vigneau, Trou Bonbon, 7 January 1782, L6A-26; Sale of Habitation by the widow Fignoux, La Grande-
Rivibre, 9 January 1783, L6A-44; Inventory of La Grande Habitation and La Ravine Blanche, La Grande-
Rivibre, 21 May 1783, L6A-60; sale of Belle Vue, La Voldrogue, 17 March 1783, L6A-45; Succession of
Sieur Lelevain, Trou Bonbon, 7 February 1784, L6A-66; Sale of Habitation by Sr. Marcorelle to Sr.
Descoufler, Trou Bonbon, 17 December 1784, L6A-88; Succession of Sieur Dangluze, 4 August 1785, G5-
100; Partnership between Srs. Canonge & Dulaud, Trou Bonbon & L'Anse du Clerc, 2 August 1785, L6A-
131; Succession of Sr. Louis Paret, Les hauteurs de la Grande-Rivibre, 2 March 1786; Sale of Habitation by
Sieur Bouch6, Les Roseaux, 16 May 1787, G5-118; Sale of Habitation by Sr. Joseph Fondelin, La
Guinaud6e, M1-15; Dissolution of Partnership Dufour, frbres, Ravine du Mitan, 11 December 1789, Ml-
65; Marriage Contract of Sieur de la Rue and Demoiselle Doucet, n.p., 21 April 1789, M1-55; Succession
of Sr. Pigal, La Guinaud6e, 21 April 1789, G5-127; Succession of Sieur Payas, n.p., 5 July 1792, M1-122;
Inventory of Habitation of Sr. Jean Baptiste Cl6ment, Plymouth, 2 October 1792, L3-30; and Inventory of
Habitation of Sr. Jean Joseph Cl6ment, Plymouth, 1792. N.B.: The citations for the last two plantation
inventories, those belonging to the Clement family, were unclear in the copies that I used from the personal
collection of David P. Geggus. According to the Jer6mie Papers finding aid, there are three inventories of
Cl6ment plantations done in the early 1790s among the papers of the notary Dobignies in that collection.












60-69
FEMALES MALES
40-49

20-29


10-14


0-4

-60.00 -40.00 -20.00 0.00 20.00 40.00 60.00
Percentage of Whole

Figure 3-1. Population Pyramid of the Workforces on Eighteen Coffee and Mixed-Crop
Plantations in the Grande-Anse, 1782-1792 (N=551)

To begin with, it is necessary to establish who the slaves were, as far as the sources

allow. The most basic division in plantation workforces was between male and female.

By determining the sex ratios of the workforces on different plantations in aggregate,

some basic parameters to slave life can be established. A sample of 606 slaves working

on eighteen coffee and mixed-crop plantations in the Grande-Anse had a sex ratio of 122

(i.e., 122 males for every 100 females). The actual ratios of males to females on different

plantations varied widely, but a sex ratio of 122 for the slaves in my sample suggests that

male slaves on coffee plantations found it difficult to find a partner.

This sex ratio of 122 is similar to that which David P. Geggus calculated for coffee

slaves throughout Saint-Domingue in the late eighteenth century. In his sample of 3,719

slaves on coffee plantations in the period 1767-1792, he found the aggregate sex ratio to

be 120, with a sex ratio of 138 for the South, where Jeremie was. The sex ratio for my










sample is higher than the 8 male slaves for every 7 female slaves (a sex ratio of 114) that

Moreau claims was the case in the South.2

Table 3-1. Numbers of Africans and Creoles on Eighteen Coffee and Mixed-Crop
Plantations in the Grande-Anse, 1780-1792 (N=551)

o_ oC CJ C-


0 0 23 23 23 23
5-9 1 0 34 26 35 26
10-14 27 6 19 22 46 28
15-19 27 25 14 8 41 33
20-29 53 39 5 17 58 56
30-39 55 26 5 4 60 30
40-49 24 17 7 1 31 18
50-59 9 17 0 1 9 18
60-69 5 3 0 1 5 4
70+ 4 1 1 1 5 2

My sample of 218 locally born creole slaves shows a considerably greater balance

between the sexes, 98 men per 100 women, which is very close to Geggus's sample. The

great majority of Jeremien creoles in the 1780s were children. They monopolized the 0-4

years cohort and strongly dominated that of 5-9 years (Figure 3.1 and Table 3.2).

Adolescents between the ages of 10 and 14 were a mixture of Africans and creoles, but

beyond this age bracket, Africans clearly dominated.3

These rough details about the Grande-Anse's slave population in the 1780s

suggest enormous changes in rural society concomitant with the coffee boom. According

to official counts, the parish of Jeremie had almost 15,000 more slaves in 1788 than in



2 David P. Geggus, "Sugar and Coffee Cultivation in Saint Domingue and the Shaping of the Slave Labor
Force," in Ira Berlin and Philip D. Morgan, eds., Cultivation and Culture: Labor and the 11-,,in of Slave
Life in the Americas (Charlottesville: University Presses of Virginia, 1993), 79; and Moreau de Saint-MWry,
Description ... de lapartiefrangaise, 3: 1165.

3Geggus, "Sugar and Coffee,"79.









1753, an eightfold increase. Many of the plantations whose inventories were sampled

were small units of production, the mean workforce size being but 30, quite a bit less than

Geggus's average of 45 slaves for his sample of 87 cafeteries for roughly the same period

(1780-1789). His range also differed by a greater margin than mine: 7 to 304 against my

10 to 90. My sample had a median of 26 slaves. These small, young, and heavily African

workforces are consistent with the region's recent development. However, even in this

part of the colony most dominated by Africans, locally born creoles made up more than

one-third of the slave population. This reinforces the impression given by Geggus's work

that the general assumption, dating from Moreau de Saint-Mery, that two-thirds of Saint-

Domingue's slaves were Africans is substantially in error.

Table 3-2. Summary of the Origins of Slaves on Coffee and Mixed-Crop Plantations in
the Grand'Anse (N=606)
Place of Origin N %N Males Females Sex Ratio
All Creoles 218 35.97 105 108 98
All Foreign Creoles 8 1.32 4 4 100
All Africans 371 61.22 224 160 151
Unidentified 9 1.49 5 4 125
All Slaves 606 100 338 276 122
Note: Excluded from calculations relative to sex ratio were four creole children of
indeterminate sex and five creole children of unknown ages, the latter all infants.

One of the key characteristics of slave life in the Americas was the inability of

slave populations to replenish their numbers naturally. Only in what would become the

United States did a slave population increase their numbers through self-reproduction. In

the rest of the hemisphere, slave societies had to import new Africans to keep up the

number of enslaved workers. Determining how well the slaves in any region grew

through natural reproduction presents certain difficulties. David Geggus cautions that

calculating slave fertility is "quite hazardous" because the births and deaths of slave










infants often went unrecorded. The best measure of slave fertility is fertility ratio (slave

children 0-4 years old per 1000 slave women 15-44 years old).4

Table 3-3. Some Factors Bearing on Slave Life on Eighteen Coffee and Mixed-Crop
Plantations, 1780-1792, Based on Notarized Plantation Inventories


Name of Plantation
Bouche
Marcorelle
Vignault
SFignoux
SFondelin
De La Rue
Belle Vue
Lelevain
TOTAL: SMALL
Payas
SParet
SDangluze
Pigal
Dufour freres
Canonge & Dulaud
TOTAL: MEDIUM
La Ravine Blanche
0 Jean Baptiste Clement
La Grande Habitation
Jean Joseph Clement
TOTAL: LARGE


TOTAL: ALL


0




10 100
10 233
12 125
13 63
13 167
14 180
16 100
16 100
104 114
24 118
27 170
32 94
32 244
38 131
47 156
200 143
68 85
69 229
76 94
90 134
303 124
607 128


.0



500
500
500
333
167
500
0
200

833
250
0
167
250
900

384
263
333
286


354


Crop type appears to have been the biggest determinant in the fertility of slave

women. Geggus's sample of 59 sucreries (years 1755-1791) indicates a median fertility

index of 281, while his sample of 56 cafeteries (years 1767-1792) indicates a

4This warning primarily concerns plantation journals, which recorded day-to-day conditions of slave life,
more than plantation inventories, which described plantation life at a particular moment in time. The
notarized plantation inventories I have consulted require the same degree of caution as plantation journals
and necessitate the same methodology. David P. Geggus, "Sugar and Coffee in Saint Domingue," in Ira
Berlin and Philip D. Morgan, eds., Cultivation and Culture: Labor and the '\,li-,,i of Slave Life in the
Americas, 90.









substantially lower index, 333. My sample of 18 coffee and mixed-crop plantations in the

Grande-Anse (years 1782-1792) indicates a slightly lower median fertility index (310).5

Table 3-4. Slave Fertility Indexes on Eighteen Coffee and Mixed-Crop Plantations by
Size of Plantation Workforce, 1782-1792




SMALL 338 417 8
MEDIUM 400 250 6
LARGE 317 310 4
All Categories 354 310 18

The size of a plantation's slave workforce was also had an important influence on

slave fertility. In Saint-Domingue as a whole, sugar estates tended to be large operations,

while the workforce sizes of coffee plantations varied widely. Our sample suggests that

medium-sized coffee estates had the highest slave fertility on average. More research is

necessary to verify this hypothesis, but our sample suggests that small plantations had the

highest fertility, based on the median fertility of the small plantations in our sample.

The Naming of Slaves and Ethnicity

Ethnic labels by which different African groups were known in Saint-Domingue

derived in part from their African origins, and planter stereotypes helped to determine

how whites viewed slaves of certain African nations. As David Geggus has shown, these

stereotypes proved less important to coffee planters, who tended to buy whatever slaves

they could and in smaller quantities than did sugar planters, who generally had better






5Geggus suggests that "On the coffee plantations the most significant factor was workforce size, which
indicates that the difficulty of finding a suitable partner was more important in the mountains." Ibid., 91
and Table 2.12.









buying power. The slaves' personal names, meanwhile, both show how planters chose to

name their chattel and one point of origin for free colored names.6

Slaveholders bestowed names both on their human chattel and their livestock.

Despite the notorious lack of religiosity in colonial society in the late eighteenth century,

the majority of the slaves had Christian names. A minority bore names from classical

European civilizations: many a plantation had its Venus and Cupidon. One is left to

wonder whether such names reflected some qualities the masters perceived in their

slaves.

The majority of the slaves in the sample only had one name. Free coloreds

generally had two. The carpenter Joseph Marlborough, for example, seems to carry the

surname of the British military leader, the Duke of Marlborough, as his surname. Other

free coloreds used names originating in "I'idiome africain" or Classical names. Surnames

such as Minerve, Yoyo, and Tripoly fall into this category. Some gens de couleur libres,

particularly members of the planter class, did have European surnames, adopted from

white progenitors or perhaps godparents.7

Ethnicity, or to use the contemporary term, nation, is a descriptor of dubious

efficacy. The ethnic labels that the planters and merchants appended to their slaves only

had an approximate relation to their slaves' African origin. Debien notes that this

identification was based in part on "country marks," ritual scarification of the face

practiced throughout western Africa but apparently not in American slave societies. Some




6 Geggus, "Sugar and Coffee," 84-86, 88.

7 Marlborough's surname may reflect the Anglophilia Charles Frostin attributes to the Grande-Anse. See
Frostin, Les revoltes blanches.










groups, however, seem to have been named for the African port from which they

embarked for the Americas.8

One ethnonym that has received much recent scholarly attention is Congo. In the

minds of their owners, Congos were short people from west-central Africa. The men

were not considered to have good potential as workers in sugar fields given that the

women did the fieldwork in their homeland. This planter stereotype explains in part why

so many Congolese found themselves on coffee estates and not on sugar plantations.9

Table 3-5. The Origins of Slaves on Eighteen Coffee and Mixed-Crop Plantations in the
Grande-Anse, 1780-1792 (N=606)
Ethnicity N % of N Males Females S/R
Creoleo1 218 35.97 105 108 97
Negre 208 100 104
Muldtre 7 4 3
Griffe 2 1 0
Quarteron 1 0 1
Foreign Creole 8 1.32 4 4 100
Portuguese 1 0 1
Spanish 1 1 0
English 3 3 3
Senegambia 20 3.30 14 6 230
Senegalese 5 3 2
Bambara 7 7 0



SDebien, Les esclaves, 39-40.

9More recently, in his recently published dissertation on the Luso-Brazilian alcohol trade to West Central
Africa during the era of the legal trans-Atlantic slave trade, Jos6 C. Curto asserts that sugar cane brandy
(cachaga) provided Brazilian slave traders with a valuable commodity that could compete with English and
French interlopers who offered European and Indian fabrics of higher quality. He contends that French
traders pursued their illicit commerce both north and south of the Portuguese seat of power, the colonial
capital of Luanda. Jos6 C. Curto, Enslaving Spirits: The Portuguese-Brazilian Alcohol Trade at Luanda
and its Hinterland, c. 1550-1830 (Leiden: Brill, 2004): 157-58; and David P. Geggus, "Sex Ratio, Age and
Ethnicity in the Atlantic Slave Trade: Data from French Shipping and Plantation Records," Journal of
African History 30, no. 1 (1989): 29-30.

10 Not included is a griffe child and five children of unknown age.

1Included in the total number of creoles but not in breakdown by phenotype and sex are five children of
unknown gender and age. One griffe child whose sex and age are unknown was included under the relevant
subheading but not in the columns for "males" and "females."









Table 3-5. Continued.
Mandingue 7 3 4
Fulani 1 1 0
Sierra Leone 9 1.49 8 1 800
Sosso 7 7 0
Timbo 2 1 1
Windward Coast 15 2.48 11 4 400
Canga 8 7 1
Kissi 5 4 1
Bobo 2 0 2
Gold Coast 15 2.48 8 7 114
Mine 14 8 6
Caramenty 1 0 1
Bight of Benin 63 10.39 25 38 66
Arada 20 2 18
Barba 2 1 1
Nago 19 8 11
Cotocoli 3 1 2
Thiamba12 14 9 5
Hausa 5 4 1
Bight of Biafra 19 3.14 10 9 111
Ibo 15 8 7
Bibi 3 2 1
Moco 1 0 1
Congo13 200 33.00 136 76 179
Congo Franc 1 1 0
Congo 183 118 65
Mondongue 16 7 9
Mozambique 12 10 2
Other Africans14 30 4.95 11 19 58
Unidentified 9 1.49 5 4 125
TOTAL 606 100.00 338 276 122

The numerical preponderance of Central Africans (i.e., Congos Francs, Congos,

Mondongues, and Mozambiques) among the Grande-Anse's African-born slave

population (200 in the sample, or 53.9%) is similar to Geggus's samples from the West



12 Also includes "Quiambas" and "Chambas."

13 Also note that Congos represented 54% of all Africans in the sample.

14
1Includes one each of Madagascar, Meyomb6, Nata, Ayouba, Gourmand, Chicart, and Cadugne and three
Aheressa.









Province (1785-1791), where Central Africans made up 52.5% of the African-born

contingent of slave workforces on cafeteries. Congos were, however, more prevalent in

the North Province (1778-1791), where they represented 68.2% of the African-born

slaves. Being a majority of Africans in the Grande-Anse does not necessarily mean West

Central Africans had an overriding impact on local slave culture. It would also be

necessary to know what ethnic groups predominated in the Grande-Anse before the 1780s

coffee boom. By analogy, the Aja-Fon of West Africa had a strong impact on Haitian

vodou not because they were the most numerous slaves in late colonial Saint-Domingue

but because they were apparently the most numerous during the first years of

settlement.15 Moreover, the young age at which Congos in particular disembarked in the

colony worked against survivals of their cultural traditions. Twenty-two (11%) of the

Congos represented in our sample were boys younger than fifteen years old. Most of the

others were well below thirty years. Embarking from Africa as boys and young men,

Congo slaves in the Grande-Anse would have had limited knowledge of their culture,

particularly the more esoteric parts of religion and tradition.

These criticisms aside, ethnicity remains a category of analysis that must be taken

seriously, if nothing more than to consider how colonial society saw the slave workforce.

Table 3-5 expresses how 606 slaves classified using these colonial ethnic descriptors

break down. If considered with those brought from the same slave catchment areas, or

"coasts," the largest African population in the Grande-Anse in the 1780s was the Congos

(N=200), among whom were the so-called "Congos Francs (True Congos)," individuals

from a wide catchment area along the coast of Angola. Another group from West-Central

1David Geggus, "Haitian Voodoo in the Eighteenth Century: Language, Culture, Resistance," Jahrbuch
fir Geschichte von Staat, Windschaft und Geschelschaft Weinamerikas 28 (1991): 36-37.









Africa were the Mondongues (N=15), whom the French reputed to be cannibals. Taken

together, West Central Africans had a sex ratio of 179, a high disparity between the sexes

but not as extreme as that of Africans from some other regions. Africanist historian

Joseph C. Miller asserts that West Central Africans elites tended to sell more men than

women into the Atlantic slave trade because, he contends, they retained females for slave

breeding. An alternative interpretation is that these women were retained as multiple

wives in a polygamous society.16

Slaves from the other "coasts" together represented only about 30 percent of the

sample population, but this does not exclude the possibility that individuals from these

catchment areas could find others of identical or similar background with whom to

reminisce about Africa, engage in cultural practices such as religious rituals, or have

children.17

The largest ethnic group in the sample was the creoles, slaves born in the colony.

They were notable for their number (N=218, or 35.97% of the sample) and their age:

most were under the age of 20 years, and many of these were born after the beginning of

the coffee boom. It is unclear where the other creoles came from. Some were surely part

of the 2,147 slaves present in the Grande-Anse at the time of the 1755 census, but it is

unknown if these creoles, like some of the free coloreds, were immigrants from other

parts of the colony, whom their migrating masters brought with them or whom their

masters sold through the coasting trade.



16 Debien, Les esclaves, 49-52; and Joseph C. Miller, Way ofDeath: Merchant Capitalism and the Angolan
Slave Trade, 1730-1830 (Madison: University of Wisconsin Press, 1988), 135.

17 John Thornton, Africa andAfricans in the Making of the Atlantic World, 1400-1800 (Second Edition;
Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998), 199.









The Slaves' Diet

Like most early modern agricultural peoples, Domingois slaves subsisted almost

entirely on starches. Planters commonly grew manioc and plantains on coffee plantations

in the Grande-Anse to supplement what the slaves presumably grew themselves on their

own provision grounds. suggest that the local diet followed the general pattern. Gabriel

Debien states in his Les esclaves aux Antilles franqaises that the nature of the slave diet

followed different patterns in the colony's three provinces, and Moreau related that "like

those in the Windward Islands," Jeremien slaves relied on "plantains, yams, taro, sweet

potatoes, and manioc."18

Inventories of property only give patchy information on food production on

individual plantations. Appraisers elected by parties interested in these inventories were

quite inconsistent in describing land use. No official guidelines appear to have existed,

and the notaries did not enforce any sort of uniformity in the estate appraisals that they

recorded. The amount of land under food cultivation was either measured in the number

of individual plants or in the number of carreaux dedicated to a certain species of crop.

Very common in the description of provision plots worked in common was the notation

"quelques vivres (some food crops)" which I have interpreted as a product either of

official laziness or of intercropping of seed crops like beans between rows of young

coffee trees.





18See Chapter 2 for more information about these rural food producers. No scholar seems to have
addressed what may have been a pre-revolutionary peasantry. Information on these habitants is made more
difficult by scanty descriptions of their properties when inventoried for sale. Fernand Braudel, The
Structures of Everyday Life: The Limits of the Possible (New York: Harper & Row, Publishers, 1979), 106-
107; and Moreau de Saint-MWry, Description ... de la partiefranqaise, 3: 1406.









Providing sufficient food for the slaves had been a problem in the French Antillean

colonies since the seventeenth century. A series of metropolitan and colonial laws, the

most important of which was the 1685 Code noir, required the habitants to provide their

chattel with a minimum ration, which in the long run effected a system of food

provisioning based on the cultivation of vivres in common plots on Saturday afternoons

under the supervision of the commander, or slave foreman. The slaves were allowed

small plots around their huts known asjardins-case, orjardins-negre. Debien argues the

jardins-case provided a rare space for African autonomy within the oppressive and

dehumanizing forced labor regime. At the end of the eighteenth centuries, thesejardins-

case were removed from the areas between the slave huts to locations closer to the

sugarcane fields and coffee groves where slaves did most of their work. Each slave then

received a provision ground to grow vegetables to supplement the starchy staples

provided by the common plots of vivres.19 The plantation inventories that I consulted

from the Grande-Anse do not discuss slave provision grounds. Rather, the notaries

recorded how much acreage was devoted to food crops and occasionally delineated how

much of each crop was in the fields.20

Aside from the carbohydrate-rich vegetable foods discussed above, slaves also took

the initiative in supplementing their diet with protein from both wild and domesticated

sources. In the West Province, slaves in the hinterland of Port-au-Prince sought for

clutches of turtle and alligator eggs. Moreau de Saint-Mery provides us with three wild


19 Debien draws his perspective on food production first from the acts of legislative-judicial bodies like the
Conseil du Roi (Royal Council) and the conseils superieurs of Saint-Domingue, Martinique, and
Guadeloupe and second from the management records of various sugar and coffee plantations, particularly
in Saint-Domingue. Debien, Les esclaves, Chapter 8.

20 Ibid., 177-86, 195.










sources of protein available to the slaves. First, in the early months of the year crabs were

very numerous off the coast of Saint-Domingue to the point of overrunning the fields.

Slaves in the Grande-Anse welcomed the opportunity for readily available protein.

Second, the Grande-Riviere de la Grande-Anse teemed with fish in the late

eighteenth century. Given that slaves fished for crabs in underwater holes, slaves living

the near La Grande-Riviere added fish from the river to their diet. Finally, the coffee

frontier expanded into the forested highlands where for two and a half centuries feral pigs

and cattle had roamed. It is within reason that at least some slaves hunted these beasts for

their subsistence, as had the buccaneers of former times, and this can be substantiated by

way of analogy.21 I propose, then, that hunting and fishing may have been subsistence

activities either encouraged or allowed by Domingois planters and their managers. The

fish-laden Grande-Riviere, feral pigs, and an annual surge of crabs were three

opportunities for the pursuit of wild sources of protein.22

Much disease among the slaves came from nutritional deficiencies, as Kenneth F.

Kiple has demonstrated in his acclaimed work The Caribbean Slave: A Biological

History. Kiple's work does have some shortcomings because he does not provide detailed

analysis of the French Antilles, though he summarizes the diet of French slaves as

basically lacking in protein and high in carbohydrates. As Kiple argues convincingly,

21Trouillot, "Motion in the System," 372-373.

22 Trouillot points out that the sugar planters resented the expansion of coffee production into the wilds
partly because it destroyed the habitats of the feral pigs. I have not found much information on hunting in
late eighteenth-century Saint-Domingue. Lacking that, I will make two observations. First, the sugar
plantocracy may have engaged in hunting as an analogue to the great hunts undertaken by the European
nobility. Second, on more secure grounds the assertion can be made that the expansion of coffee sealed off
a frontier that may have had some cultural significance for the Dominguan elite. After all, the founders of
the sugar complex were successful buccaneers. The cultural significance of the frontier is a topic
unresearched in the historiography of Saint-Domingue, but it reminds one of Frederick Jackson Turner's
Frontier Thesis in United States history, long since abandoned by Americanist historians. Ibid.









such a diet left a population susceptible to beriberi and other nutritional deficiency

diseases. He correlates symptoms of beriberi with those of "mal d'e 'iimL h/li" (sic), a

common and fatal disease among Caribbean slave populations. Mal d'estomac, also

called mal coeur in the French colonies and mal de est6mago in the Spanish was

widespread, but the slaves, their masters, and European-trained medical professionals

each had their own opinions on its etiology.23

In accordance with their own cultural context, African bondsmen, when questioned

about the disease, blamed their affliction on witchcraft. In discussing vodou before the

Haitian Revolution, David Geggus has asserted that slaves practicing African or Afro-

Caribbean belief systems would look for supernatural causes for misfortunes. European

planters, plantation managers, and surgeons, by contrast, tended to attribute the slaves'

lethargy and melancholy to a loss of a will to live, an insidious admission of their slaves'

humanity and autonomy. Kiple, however, challenges both of these contemporary views

by resorting to modern medical science. The general wasting away and lethargy of slaves

in the grip of mal d'estomac bear resemblance to a number of diseases whose etiology is

known in the present day. Kiple singles out two: beriberi and hookworm infestation and

argues convincingly that the former was probably the cause of mal d'estomac.24

To the point, mal d'estomac was the single most common disease reported among

the sample Jeremien slave population. Of the five cases reported in the sample, four

occurred on La Grande Habitation in May 1783, but the plantation manager reported no



23 Kenneth F. Kiple and Virginia H. Kiple, "Deficiency Diseases in the Caribbean," Journal of
Interdisciplinary History 11, no. 2 (1980), reprinted in Hilary Beckles and Verene Shepherd, eds.,
Caribbean Slave Society and Economy: A Student Reader (New York: The New Press, 1991), 177-78.

24Geggus, "Haitian Voodoo," 47.









cases among the slaves of La Ravine Blanche. Both were coffee plantations owned by Sr.

Augustin Tripier, and the same manager oversaw both. The high rate of the disease

appears to have been tied to the virulent hurricane of the previous September, which

destroyed the grand'case (master's residence) and apparently much of the food supply as

well. The manager reported that slaves on that plantation were in quite bad shape:

thirteen were described simply as "infirm," one was blind, three had venereal disease, and

three had the skin disease known as crab yaws. In all, 25 of the 76 slaves living at La

Grande Habitation complained of some sort of physical affliction.25

Occupational Mobility on Coffee Plantations

Even with the bad material conditions facing slaves in the Grande-Anse and their

counterparts throughout the Caribbean basin, there was some room for advancement

within the structures of plantation slavery. The most prestigious occupations available to

bondsmen were available only to men. As David Geggus has demonstrated, on sugar

plantations in Saint-Domingue a sizable minority of slave men became artisans,

supervisors, livestock handlers, and domestic servants. Women, who came to form the

majority of the field laborers on sucreries, sometimes found advancement in such

onerous occupations as washerwomen and seamstresses. Female slaves, particularly older

women, could also seek medical posts auxiliary to those of European physicians and

surgeons. Though ridiculed and sometimes resented by their masters and other

Europeans, these enslaved medical specialists no doubt earned prestige and power within

their own communities.26


25 At the time of the inventory of the estate, the manager had taken over one of the slave cabins to serve as
his residence. L6A-60, JP-N.

26Geggus, "Sugar and Coffee," 84.









In the colony's coffee plantations, by contrast, slaves had few chances for

occupational advancement. Whereas slave men on sugar plantations had a chance of

advancing within the building trades and as personal servants of the more superfluous

sort, these routes were often denied to slaves on coffee plantations. Coffee planters

tended to hire entrepreneurs de bdtiments to have new buildings erected and old ones

extended and repaired, and only rarely did small planters keep many personal servants.

Local conditions also played a role: bad roads limited the efficacy of keeping a coachman

at the ready. In the Grande-Anse, a little less than half of the coffee plantations sampled

lacked any elite slaves at all. Those that did generally maintained only commanders, or

slave foremen, above the pool of field slaves.

According to Debien, the commander was a man that the common workers were

to hold in great respect and fear. That author's sources, generally absentee sugar planters,

directed their plantation managers grantst) not to castigate their commanders publicly.

Ideal commanders, in Debien's analysis, were to be vigorous men who knew the

plantation work regimen. Knowledge of several African languages was also an

advantage, the better to incorporate bossales into the plantation's society. Mirroring the

colonial principle of divide and rule, the planter or his grant should appoint a

commander who was not of the same ethnicity of the majority of the workers. As in

other aspects of slave life in Saint-Domingue region, crop type, and workforce size

appear to have been important factors in the social structure of slave society in the

Grande-Anse. From descriptions in extant plantation inventories we can catch some

glimpses at least of how the commanders on these plantations appeared to white

observers (Table 3-6) My sample of commanders on coffee and mixed-crop plantations









in the Grande-Anse shows the diverse origins of slave drivers. Unlike sugar plantations,

coffee plantations tended to be relatively new operations, which may go far to explain

why so many Africans were appointed as slave drivers instead of creoles, who tended to

be much too young and inexperienced for so much responsibility.27

Table 3-6. Profiles of Commandeurs on Coffee and Mixed-Crop Plantations in the
Grande-Anse, 1780-1792
SPlantation Slave's "Nation" Description Monetary Price
Year ,Nation Description .
Name Name Age (livres coloniaux)
Branded
1784 Lelevain Prince Congo 35 elevain" 2000
"Lelevain
1785 Dangluze Pierre Creole 35 N/A Not given
1786 Paret Lafortune Congo 25 N/A Not given
1787 Fondelin Balthazard Creole 35 N/A Not given
Spanish One hand
1789 Dufour Jean Spanish 45 One hand 3000
Creole missing
o Scales on his
1789 Pigal Francisque Thiamba 55 Not given
eyes

Housing and Community

The plantation, in its role as a self-sufficient unit of agricultural production,

provided the slaves with lodging in addition to nutrition. According to Pere Jean-Baptiste

Labat and other seventeenth-century observers, slaves built their own houses (cases a

negres) in the colonies' early years, and, as was the case of their masters, the slaves built

their dwellings in accordance with their own aesthetics.28

In the eighteenth century, and particularly on the sugar estates, planters began to

have the slaves' lodging built for them according to what the masters preferred. In this

regard, Jdrdmien coffee planters seem to have agreed. Usually lacking slaves trained in


27 Debien, Les esclaves, 122-23.

28 In the seventeenth century Barbadian sugar planters forced both their African slaves and European
indentured servants to build their own huts. See Hilary MacD. Beckles, "Sugar and White Servitude: An
Analysis of White Indentured Labor during the Sugar Revolution of Barbados, 1643-1655," Journal of the
Barbados Museum and Historical Society 36, no. 3 (1981): 236-46.









the building trades, habitants regularly contracted with entrepreneurs de bdtiments for

the construction of cases a negres. A few such contracts have survived in the Jeremie

Papers, most of which were with S. Bernard Fourcand, a former ship's carpenter who

obviously found a lucrative business during with the building boom in Jeremie and its

hinterland in the 1780s.29

Table 3-7. Slave Housing on Small and Middling Coffee and Mixed-Crop Plantations in
the Grande-Anse, 1780-1789 (N=9)



0 w U U 0
a6 o > u E

Marcorelle 10 2 5.00 Not given
Vigneau 12 2 6.00 Not given
Fondelin 13 4 3.25 Not given
Lelevain 16 1 16.00 40 x 14
Paret 27 2 13.50 40 feet long
Dangluze 32 2 16.00 Not given
Pigal 32 3 10.67 Not given
Dufour freres 38 12 3.16 Not given
Canonge & Dulaud 47 8 5.88 30 x 15

The proportions and number of the cases built by the entrepreneurs, or rather the

colored carpenters working for them, allow some room to speculate about sleeping

arrangements on specific plantations. Table 3-7 presents a sample of nine small and

medium-sized plantations for which data exist on slave housing. Many plantation

inventories neglect slave housing altogether, which for some plantations may have meant

that slaves slept wherever they could. Only in nine of the fourteen inventories sampled

were slave quarters mentioned at all, and only in three of these cases did the notary note

the dimensions of the structures. From the data available, it seems that small plantations


29 Personal correspondence with Andreuce Fourcand.
Personal correspondence with Andrde-Luce Fourcand.









(in this sample, 10-15 slaves) had smaller dwellings more akin to the African huts Labat

and other observers describe for the late seventeenth century. It is reasonable to assume

that individual families (however defined) each had a house of their own or that slaves of

specific ethnicities lived together. Medium-sized plantations, however, seem to follow

the trend Debien finds for eighteenth-century sugar plantations towards larger slave

quarters that more closely resembled barracks. Professional carpenters built these

structures, which were too uniform in dimension to have been built by unskilled slave

labor.

The slaves on the Canonge & Dulaud cafeterie, by contrast, lived in eight buildings

of uniform dimension, 30 feet long by 15 feet wide. Each occupant thus had 76.5 square

feet of personal space and an average of 6 persons lived in each unit. The only other

plantation list that allows for the same calculation is that for the Lelevain plantation,

whose sixteen slaves lived under one roof; in this case, each slave had 35 square feet of

personal space. From this small sample, it is difficult to contemplate to what degree such

variables as personal space, occupants per dwelling, and sex ratio determined slave

fertility.

Conclusions

Notarized inventories of coffee plantations in the Grande-Anse suggest that slave

life there had many parallels with cafeteries in other parts of Saint-Domingue. In the

sample of eighteen coffee and mixed-crop plantations that I have presented here, where

crop type was the only constant, workforce size appears as a major determinant of certain

aspects of slave life, particularly the fertility of slave women. Many of these plantations

had been established relatively recently compared to sugar plantations in the colony's

plains. Their workforces were quite young and more African than most sugar estates, but






58


even in these relatively new plantations, locally born creoles constituted over a third of

the entire slave population.















CHAPTER 4
FAMILY, RACE, AND PATRONAGE IN THE GRANDE-ANSE BEFORE THE
FRENCH REVOLUTION

The study of social patterns among the free population in the Grande-Anse is a

topic that the notarial records open up. Given the abundant recent work on free coloreds

before the Revolution, it is worthwhile to pursue the family structure and social relations

of both free coloreds and petits blancs and how these relations intersected. With that

objective in mind, sacramental records and marriage contracts take on much importance.

A primary means of understanding Jeremien society is marriage and baptismal

patterns. The analysis that follows takes into account such records from 1781, the only

year falling within the parameters of this study whose ecclesiastical records have

survived in their entirety in the Jeremie Papers. Given the small size of my database on

this matter, I intend for the conclusions made below to be suggestive of the way Jeremien

society functioned in regards to the rate of legitimacy of births, the phenotypical

composition of the gens de couleur libres, and local patterns of patronage.

Table 4-1. Infants Baptized in the Parish of Jeremie, 1781
Sang
Year N Legitimacy1 Blanc Muldtre Quarteron Tierceron Metif M6e2
1781 47 68% 15 7 7 3 1 2
Source: Ecclesiastical Records, 1781, Jer6mie, JP-G.




I have calculated legitimacy based on the formula: number of children baptized with known father
divided by those baptized without a known or recognized father.

Here I have abbreviated for "sang-mel&." Literally meaning "mixed blood," this descriptor was applied to
those individuals who were deemed to have some detectable trace of non-European ancestry.









The first factor to consider is the ratio of white to non-white participants in

baptism. In 1781, the curate of the church in Jeremie baptized twenty children of color,

fifteen white children, and twelve children of unknown phenotype, for a total of forty-

seven. In aggregate, their parents reflected the diverse phenotypical composition

pervasive throughout Saint-Domingue and other slave societies in the Greater Caribbean.

As is the case with slave families, understanding the structure of free families is an

undertaking complicated by problems of paternity. The rate of illegitimacy (32%)

compounds these difficulties.

In aggregate, eighteen individual white fathers came before the priest with thirteen

white mothers. To explain this discrepancy, it is necessary to state that the five discrepant

cases involved poor ecclesiastical reporting. In some cases some whites who lacked any

standing in the community were given no designation, as was the British prisoner-of-war,

Andre (Andrew) Cavanagh, when he and his wife presented their newborn daughter for

baptism. Similarly, the priest quite often left out the racial designation of important free

coloreds. In a great many other cases, children were baptized unrecognized by their

fathers. Although Stewart R. King asserts that men were likely to recognize paternity at

the baptisms of their illegitimate children, my data for the Grande-Anse reveal no such

instances of recognition of paternity.3

A sample of thirty testaments recorded in the Grande-Anse between May 1780


3King advocates establishing parentage based on the white godfather of colored children, but, based on the
data that I have, I believe this approach to lack the rigor necessary to be an efficacious method of recreating
family structure. In many cases white men of some standing in the community stood as godparents for
colored children, both legitimate and illegitimate. It is tempting to argue as King does, because in many
cases these white godfathers stood for children of color of a "whiter" phenotype than their mothers.
Without other evidence (e.g., a last will and testament), I have refrained from naming fathers for children of
color where the basis for this assumption in the sources is lacking. For his view of white godparentage of
colored children, see King, Blue Coat or Powdered Wig, 13.










and August 1789 provide room for some general conclusions before discussing how

testators used these documents to protect their dependents after their own demise. There

is a clear correspondence between gender and phenotype. Of the 30 testaments sampled,

23 (77%) of the testators were men, and only one of these men was nonwhite (see Table

4-2). The most common testator was an aged habitant concerned about those he would

leave behind; the median age of the eighteen testators who gave their ages was 48 years.

Although there is no way to compare this figure with the average age of the free

population, it does not coincide with the image of the young immigrant fresh from the

metropole, intent on his fortune. Likewise all of the female testators were women of

color: 1 "ingenue,"4 2 negresses, 1 motive, 2 in/tdhi ,,ee',, and 1 griffe.5

Table 4-2. Occupations of Male Testators (N=23)
Habitant Trader6 Merchant7 Bureaucrat Artisan None
Occupation8 14 2 2 1 3 1
Sources: L6A-13, L6A-14, L6A-23, L6A-41, L6A-70, L6A-98, L6A-121, L6A-138, L6A-139, L6B-2,
L6B-6, L6B-36, L6B-39, L6B-55, L6B-61, L6B-155, M1-13, M1-16, M1-89, G5-82, G5-101, G5-114
2, G5-130, all in JP-N.

As mentioned above, men in the Grande-Anse who fathered illegitimate children

did not accept their offspring as their own through baptismal rites. Instead, they preferred


4"Ing6nu" (feminine ingenue) in colonial practice referred to a person of free birth but presumably of some
African or, less likely, indigenous ancestry.

5With this obvious bias in mind, it is still useful to tap this means of understanding J&r6mien society. As
outlined in Table 3.7, half of the testators were landowners, or habitants, including one ingenue. Over a
quarter more identified themselves as members of the urban sector. Finally, seven gave no occupation, six
of whom were women. Daniel Scott Smith found that 36 percent of men and 6 percent of women left wills
in Hingham, Massachusetts. Daniel Scott Smith, "Underregistration and Bias in Probate Records: An
Analysis of Data from Eighteenth-Century Hingham, Massachusetts," William and Mary Quarterly 32, no.
1 (January 1975), 104.

6 Marchand, a term indicating someone engaged only in local trade.

7 Ngociant, a term indicating someone engaged in international trade.

8 "None" refers to individuals without any stated means of gainful employment. "Habitant/e" refers
likewise to landowners, no matter their socioeconomic power.









to give tacit recognition through material support by way of testaments and, less often, by

acts of donation. By reading through the lines, we can establish through a few examples

the kinds of relationships that existed between men-almost always white men-and

their illegitimate offspring.

In July 1782, Sr. Francois Desormeaux, a habitant residing at Trou Bonbon,

delivered a heifer to le nomme Hildevert Sonfillers, the illegitimate son filss natural) of

motive Marie Louise Legendre, a plantation owner in her own right at Grande-Riviere. If

Desormeaux's appointment as executor and attorney (procureur) to his fellow habitants

is any indication of his standing in the local community, he could simply have shown

paternalistic, not necessarily paternal, feelings toward Sonfillers: he also gave two cows

to his goddaughter, but his donation "due to the amity and humanity" he felt for the

young man suggests there was something more going on.9

Another, clearer case of tacit paternal recognition came to pass with the testament

of Sr. Joseph Pejac, a mason who resided at Les Caimittes. As he lay dying of a

hemorrhage, Pejac dictated his final wishes that, among other things, four quarteron

children, presumably his, be given an allowance for their maintenance until they married

or reached their majority. Two days later, Pejac, still on his deathbed and now claiming to

be a navigator by profession, altered the legacy to his four children to be 1000 livres each

for ten years. He showed special concern for the eldest, fifteen-year-old Francois, whom

he described both times as an imbecile. He stressed his concern for all of the children,



9His goddaughter, Demoiselle Bonne, the daughter of master surgeon Sr. Dominique Lelevain, produced
three bulls and a gazelle by the time of the latter's succession in February 1784. Donation of gazelle from
Sr. Francois Desormeaux to le nomm6 Hildevert Sonfillers, 18 July 1782, Jkr6mie Papers, Notaries: L6A-
38; and Succession of Sr. Dominique Lelevain, in life master surgeon at Trou Bonbon, 7 February 1784,
ibid.: L6A-66.









however, by making provision for his executor to be deposed if the latter did not enforce

their legacy.10

A third interesting case of a white man's attention to his presumed natural children

was that of Sr. Jean-Baptiste de St. Martin. De St. Martin, a habitant at le Vieux Bourg,

dictated his will as he prepared to depart from the Grande-Anse on business. He

apparently felt less insecure than Pejac that his final wishes would be carried out. De St.

Martin declared that he owed his housekeeper Marie Francoise dite Leloy 13,000 livres

for the previous thirteen years of dedicated service. He also left a legacy for her two

natural sons, "born Dieudonne, baptized as Jean Baptiste Augustin" and Pierre Fortune

(the quantity of which, unfortunately, time has rotted away on the original manuscript)

and ordered his creole slave driver commanderu) Jean Baptiste to serve the two young

quarterons for four years, after which time they were to appeal to the governor and

intendant of the colony for his liberty."

Not only men used testaments to protect natural children from post-mortem legal

entanglements. In her October 1786 testament, negresse libre Marie Magdelaine Lizette

Zebeat moved to protect her muldtresse daughter whom she described as "fille naturelle

provenant de ses oeuvres." The "work" to which Zebeat refers is elusive (perhaps

prostitution), though couples seeking the sanctification of their unions often mentioned


10Pejac, a native of "Boudelat, diocese of Auch in Gascogne," had a partnership with the griffe Laurince
Lachaume to run a store (magasin) at Les Caimittes, apparently a warehouse where local planters (e.g., the
Lafonds and Noel Azor, discussed below) stored their coffee while awaiting export to Jkr6mie or
elsewhere. His four children discussed here were not Laurince's: all her children were mulitres and
mulitresses. [1st] Testament of Sr. Joseph Pejac, 19 Sept 1785, ibid.: L6A-139; Dissolution of partnership
between Sr. Joseph Pejac and la nomm6e Laurince grif libre, dite Lachaume, 20 September 1785, ibid.:
L6A-140; 2nd Testament of Sr. Joseph Pejac, 20 September 1785, ibid.: L6A-141; and Testament of la
nomm6e Laurince, griffe libre, dite Lachaume, 21 September 1785, ibid.: L6A-144.

11Testament of Sr. Jean Baptiste de St. Martin, 26 June 1789, ibid.: T1-89.









children who resulted from their oeuvress" together. By her testament Zebeat gave her

daughter 300 livres a year pension until she reached her majority. The bulk of her estate

was destined, however, for her executor, the muldtre Jean David, a man of unknown

relation to the testator.12

Unlike Zebeat, negresse Marguerite Boucan used her testament to seek the

manumission of her son Jean Baptiste who had been enrolled in the town's police force

as a cheap way to earn his freedom. Declaring that she lacked another legal heir (and not

wanting or able to leave her estate to her son, a slave), Boucan willed her property to her

executor, muldtre habitant Francois Roo dit Licaq. As in similar cases, Roo dit Licaq

would have taken Jean Baptiste into his clientele following his mother's demise. 13

Finally, Marguerite Rozaire, the ingenue (free-born) widow of Sr. Alexis Humbert

Bouchereau, sought to protect her son from the avarice of his older and legitimate half-

siblings. She had borne him in her widowhood, and when she caught a fever she called

for the notary in order to protect the boy's interests. The clauses of her testament

underlined her concern for his future welfare: she gave him two slaves from her

plantation's workforce and, to better protect him, she appointed the boy's godfather as

her executor.14

These six vignettes suggest the ways in which men and women used their

testaments to express their anxiety over the fate of their illegitimate children after their

deaths and devised ways to protect those without to protect them from legitimate heirs

1Testament of Marie Magdelaine Lizette Zebeat, 5 October 1786, ibid.: L6B-45..

1Testament of Marguerite Boucan, 12 July 1785, ibid.: L6A-112. On military manumissions, see King,
Blue Coat or Powdered Wig, 109.

14 L6A-52.









who would seek to deprive them of material support in the future. In effect, they implied

(in some cases stronger than others) that the executor of their respective estates was to be

the patron and protector of children left without other legal recourse, and as the guardian

of the deceased person's estate and its resources, the executor was in an ideal position to

show favoritism to illegitimate but cherished heirs.15

Paternalistic sentiment extended beyond just protecting illegitimate children,

however. Godparentage was one way to create special ties between families, and these

ties went both vertical from patron to client and horizontally between families of equal

standing. In May 1781, Jacques Lafond of Fond d'Icaque stood as godfather to the infant

son of Celestin Betouzet of La Voldrogue, thus strengthening the bond between two

prominent colored planting families. Three months later, Lafond became the godfather of

his nephew Paul Fortunat, this time bringing his own family closer together.16

Vertical connections forged through godparentage are easier to see. In 1781, the

priest at Jeremie baptized fifteen illegitimate colored children. In these cases, the men

who stepped forward to godfather these children represented patrons to whom the

children and their mothers could turn for support. The prevalence of white men in this

role suggests that whites played a significant role as the patrons of the gens de couleur.17

This is not to say that men of color did not play their role as patrons to other people

of color who lacked their success or advantages. Quarteron planter Jean Cadet Atlasse,



1In the case of the male testators described above, it is telling that they threatened and begged their
executors to care for their illegitimate offspring but never officially recognized them, a step that would
have made these children legitimate heirs on equal footing with relatives in France, for instance.

16Ecclesiastical records, 1781, Jer6mie, JP-G.

1Ibid.









for instance, was the court-appointed guardian of Jean Marie Madere, a young man of

color who entered into a partnership with another young muldtre to plant coffee in La

Guinaudee, the same canton where Atlasse lived.18

Another commonplace mechanism for patronage within this society was individual

slave manumissions, in a way similar to that of Sr. de St. Martin's creole commander

who would continue to serve the master's family in case of his death. Patronage presents

an ideological explanation for the economically illogical habit of liberating one's

obedient and, often, "elite" slaves such as drivers, artisans, and domestics, who were

often quite valuable both in terms of crude monetary value and potential for profit. In

January 1785, Jacques Lafond acted out the patron's role towards a negresse named

Marie-Claire who belonged to the Berquier family. He and his wife, Jeanne Petit dite

Jeannette, explained to the notary that in 1776 while the latter was married to her first

husband, Paul Fortunat, she had Monsieur Berquier's approval for her to send a slave to

work in Marie-Claire's place for ten years. In the 1785 act, Berquier's widow agreed to

have Marie-Claire emancipated in return for this second slave to compensate for the

necessary liberty tax.19

While the paternal relationship between patrons and clients was important in

Jeremien society, so was friendship. In October 1784, Louis Lacheville donated his

coffee plantation at Fond d'Icaque to Jean Baptiste Cophi. Both men were hommes de

couleur libres (free men of color): Lacheville was a muldtre and Cophi a negre. Though

the document formalizing the donation gives no indication of the relationship between the


18Partnership between Jean Marie Madere and Gilles Bouquet, mulitres, JP-G.

19 Ratification, 25 January 1785, L6A-90.










two men, it is apparent that it was a close one. Lacheville agreed to donate all his

property to Cophi but retained use of it until his death. Reading between the lines, it

seems that Lacheville was establishing Cophi as his heir on the stipulation that he care for

him in his old age. This donation appears to be an example of the strong binds of

friendship found occasionally in notarial documents, evidence perhaps of the need for a

trusted friend in a society like that of Saint-Domingue numerically dominated by

immigrant men, both free and enslaved.20 The importance of exchanging property with

one's friends comes out in testaments, when the testator's closest friends became his

executors and, if he lacked any kin to inherit his estate, his universal heirs as well.

Placing friends in such trusted positions insured that one's debts were paid and that

beloved but illegitimate heirs were protected from less well-regarded ones who had better

claims on the estate.

A necessary addition to this discussion of connections within society is marriage

patterns. To do this, I will reconstruct two free colored planting families. Unlike their

counterparts in those parts of the North and West studied by Stewart R. King, the free

coloreds of the Grande-Anse do not appear to have generated a military elite. Archers de

police occasionally left their mark in the notaries' registers, but the data I collected






20 Aside from the interpersonal relationships that can be deduced from the document, other details of
Lacheville's economic life also come to light. He owned 6000 coffee trees, thirteen horses--seven mares
and six foals--and one slave, a Congolese man named Joli Coeur. Aside from his income from coffee, and
given the relatively small number of trees on his land and his very small workforce, horse-trading may have
been a profitable enterprise. He acquired most of his horses from Noel Azor and Jacques Lafond, hommes
de couleur who lived nearby and about whom more will be said below. The very high fertility rate among
his horses (86 per 100) indicates that he was actively breeding his stock, perhaps with an neighbor as a
business partner. Donation of habitation from Louis Lacheville to Jean Baptiste Cophi, L6A-74, 8 Oct
1784, JMr6mie Papers.









indicates no significant connections involving men who identified themselves as being of

that occupation.21

The case is stronger for a free colored planter elite in the Grande-Anse, but

identifying its members using King's methodology presents problems. For whatever

reason, free coloreds did not sell large properties worth 10,000 livres. Perhaps they held

onto what they possessed, or maybe the free coloreds in the quarter were not wealthy

individuals. It is necessary, then, to resort to qualitative means of determining who was

important among the local free coloreds. I have decided then to focus on the connections

forged by two families whose members appear to have been quite important to less

affluent free coloreds, the Lafonds and the Atlasses.

The Lafonds who appear in the notarial and ecclesiastical records of the 1780s were

the quarteron sons and daughters of Sr. Antoine Lafond, a European who married

Genevieve Gagnard, a muldtresse, before 1765. To understand the origin of this family,

one has to begin with the cursory observations Moreau de Saint-Mery made in his

Description. As he guides his reader on a tour of the parish from west to east, the author

stops for a moment to describe Fond d'Icaque, which he notes was a dependency of Les

Caimittes and a place named for the many plants called icaquiers growing in its vicinity.

Fond d'Icaque is a long, narrow valley running east to west. The valley's bottom is a






21Only one individual encountered in the Jkr6mie Papers claimed to have served in the colored
expeditionary forces, the Chasseurs-Royaux, that King indicates was so important, but and he was an
emigrant from the North. This man's testament is important, however, because it shows how notaries
tampered with the racial designations of their clients. In preparing his draft of the testament, the notary
disputed Dupont's claim to have been born as issue of a legitimate marriage and downgraded his phenotype
from m6tif to muldtre.









marsh, but Moreau asserts that the habitants grew coffee in the higher places in the marsh

and ran pigs on the slopes.22

By the early 1780s, a free colored enclave existed on the land grant of 1,400

carreaux that Sieur Lafond received from the Crown. His son Jacques Lafond,fils, and

son-in-law Noel Azor prospered as coffee planters, and the scant evidence available

indicates that family members owned adjacent properties. His sons and sons-in-law

became godfathers to each other's children, and when Genevieve Lafond's husband Paul

Fortunat met an untimely death her brother Pierre and brother-in-law Noel Azor became

the legal protectors of her children.23

A second colored planter family that is well-documented in the notarial archive, is

that of Jean Cadet Atlasse. The family matriarch, Marguerite Laroche dite Atlasse, was

manumitted in 1728. As a freedwoman she immigrated to the Grand'Anse by January

1771, when her freedom papers were registered with the local government registrar. In

August of that year, she bought up sieur Jean Agasse's half of the coffee plantation that

he owned with sieur Jean Georges Sauvanelle. In late August 1787 she sold the plantation

in the canton of la Guinaudee to a white named Joseph Fondelin for 100,000 livres but

retained use of her own bedchamber in the grand'case.24 The following month,

Marguerite Atlasse's three daughters banded together behind their brother Jean Cadet


22 The modem editors of Description ... de la parties francaise indicate that Antoine Lafond was a "native
of Bourg Saint-Andool, habitant propri6taire at Fond d'Icaque, parish of Jer&mie, husband of Genevieve
Gagnard, mulatresse. He died 3 January 1780, at the age of about 70 years." They based this and other
biographical details on documents consulted at the Archives Nationales, Paris. Moreau, Description, 3:
1390-1391, 1506.

23Marriage contract between Louis Macaya and Genevibve Lafond, 19 February 1789, L6B-167.

24 Sale of coffee plantation at la Guinaud6e by sieur Joseph Fondelin to les nomm6s Jean Cadet Atlasse et
al., 4 September 1787, M-15, Jer&mie Papers.









Atlasse to buy back their mother's estate from Fondelin for 10,000 livres more than their

mother had sold it for. Fondelin pocketed the extra money, and Marguerite Atlasse

gained a yearly pension from her children as Fondelin passed his mortgage on the

property to them.

Before discussing connections established by the Lafond and Atlasse through

marriage, it is necessary to discuss free colored marriage choice in more general terms. A

sample of marriages drawn from the 1781 ecclesiastical records and from marriage

contracts drawn up during the 1780s suggests that officially sanctioned marriages, unlike

casual or consensual unions, were nearly always endogamous, in the sense of whites

marrying whites and nonwhites marrying nonwhites. A sample of ten marriages involving

white spouses bears this out: in nine of the cases, both parties were white; in the tenth, the

phenotype of the bride is unknown. More to the point is a sample of 21 marriages

involving free coloreds (see Table 4-3). In 62% (13) of the cases, both of the spouses

were of the same phenotype. When the spouses were of different hue, there was a nearly

even division between those cases in which the groom was darker and in those cases in

which the bride was the darker spouse. In all cases involving marriages between persons

of different phenotypes, there was almost always one degree of difference in color

between the spouses. For example, Jean Baptiste Francois Etienne Bazile dit Estienne, a

muldtre, brought 4500 livres when contracting marriage with Julie Bregard, a

quarteronne who brought 4300 livres worth of property into the marriage. The

implications of this match are clear: Estienne, a muldtre of illegitimate birth contracted to









marry a quarteronne of similar circumstances and of similar wealth. In their case,

socioeconomic position negated any phenotypical differences.25

Table 4-3. Marriage Choice among the Gens de couleur libres (N=20)
Phenotype: Groom-Bride Frequency Degree of Difference26
Muldtre-Muldtresse 8 0
Metif-Muldtresse 1 2
Quarteron-Quarteronne 2 0
Negre-Negresse 2 0
Indien27-Negresse 1 1
Tierceron-Tierceronne 1 0
Quarteron-Muldtresse 2 1
Grif-Muldtresse 1 1
Metif-Quarteronne 1 1
Muldtre-Quarteronne 1 1
Note: Excluded from this table is one couple; the
groom was described as "affrachi," and the bride was a negresse.

Such a model is, however, reductionistic and leaves out any ideological factors at

play, such as how the parties felt towards each other. The sources do not allow us to go so

far as to say that parties contracting marriage before a notary and celebrating marriage

before a priest were in romantic love in the modern sense. Some did, however, relate

feelings of friendship (amitie), one to the other as grooms in particular planned for the

dissolution of their marriage by death. Marriage contracts, both between whites and

between coloreds, occasionally included clauses allowing the survivor rights of usufruct





25 Marriage contract, 5 May 1786, G5-106.

26 Using Moreau de Saint-Mery's description of racial mixture as a guide, I have attempted to show here
that marriages between persons of different phenotypes occurred without a great jump in color difference.

27 It is unknown whether the indien in question, Nicolas Bessin, was of ancestry indigenous to Hispaniola
or of elsewhere. Moreau de Saint-Mdry argued that descent from West Indians (indiens occidentaux)
should be calculated as for the mulitres to whom he compared them, that they were in effect straight-haired
mulattoes.









over some or all of the communal estate or the claim to property from the estate up to a

specified value (often 1000 livres but more for wealthier couples).

The marriage patterns of members of the Lafond family correspond with the

samples discussed above. It remains unclear what free coloreds found desirable in a

spouse's conditions of color and birth. Sieur Lafond's daughter Genevieve married the

first time to Paul Fortunat, a quarteron, and the second to Louis Macaya, a muldtre of

unrecognized paternity. The apparent factors at play in her second choice apparently

included finding a stepfather for her young children from her first marriage, but in

reductionistic terms, she was actually marrying down in society, because Macaya was,

unlike her, illegitimate and was darker than her. According to the colonial discourse

related by Moreau de Saint-Mery, coloreds should be whitening, but on the frontier in

Fond d'Icaque, in relative isolation ten leagues from the sea, free coloreds seemed able to

define a discourse that only survived as fragments in the notarial archive.

Members of the Atlasse family, though of different social origins, demonstrated

similar marriage patterns. Marguerite Atlasse's four children pursued different routes in

establishing their own households. Jean Cadet Atlasse married a muldtresse, had at least

three children, and managed his own plantation in La Guinaudee adjacent to the one he

and his sisters bought from Fondelin. One of his sisters, Barbe Gertrude Gaucherelle, was

an habitante at Les Roseaux and a widow by 1787. Her daughter Elizabeth Viard, herself

only two generations from slavery, married a white immigrant from Bordeaux, Jacques

Eglize, in 1787. The second sister, Francoise Atlasse, married Francois Bouchereau, a

quarteron coffee planter from La Grande-Riviere, with whom she had at least three

children. The third sister, Marie Thereze Sauvanelle dite Sanite, never married but had









five children nonetheless. She diversified her investments between a small store in La

Haute-Ville and a share in the family plantation at La Guinaudee, and at the time of her

death in 1789 she was nearly worth enough to give each of her children the 10,000 livres

that she wanted to.28

From the marriage patterns of the couples included in the samples discussed above

and of the members of the Atlasse and Lafond families, it appears that free coloreds

usually married individuals of their own phenotype (e.g., muldtres tended to marry

nillAtill ee)'\) but that when they married individuals of color different from their own that

they did so within certain limits. If this is true, muldtres tended to marry griffes,

quarteronnes, and perhaps negresses but not persons of phenotypes very much lighter or

darker than they.

Religious Belief

Although testaments are a useful source for understanding personal relationships,

they are also an interesting source for exploring religious belief. In an area which lacked

a parish church and where the rectory shared a town lot with a powder magazine, it is

interesting to probe briefly into how testators invoked the supernatural, or not, as they

declared their final intentions. As with similar documents, we can know only what they

cared to tell the notary, perhaps not what their inner beliefs were. Most were content with

commending their spirit to the Almighty, to be received, they hoped, into the presence of

the bien heureux or with affirming that they were good Catholics who wished to die in

the faith. Some were more creative. Sr. Isaac Delahaye, by 1789 a blind old planter,

declared that "I commend my soul to God, Father, Son, and Holy Spirit... to be placed


28Rental of a petit magasin, 26 October 1789, G5-132, JP-N.









in the Kingdom ... [and I ask] all the Saints of Paradise and especially St. Isaac, my

patron, to intercede on my behalf." Likewise, as he lay sick in bed, Sr. Joseph Vigneau

expressed his hope that "as a Christian, Catholic, Roman, and Apostolic, he commends

his soul to God, the Father in all persons, to the Bien heureuse Virgin Mary, to the saints

of Paradise, asking His Divine Majesty to have mercy upon him and to receive his soul

after its Separation from his Body." Finally, habitant Sr. Antoine Dolle expressed his

desire for a simple funeral "sanspompe" and left the details to the good sense of his

executor.29

The Free Coloreds Rise Up

While they participated in the economic and social life of the quarter with whites

until the end of the ancien regime, the prominent men of color in the Grande-Anse also

played their part in opposing the forces of white supremacy in the Revolution. While the

slaves in the North began their famous uprising in August 1791, the free coloreds of the

West started their own struggle for equality, though the two movements were unrelated

and had quite different ends.30 The free coloreds of the Caimittes region likewise

converged on Fond d'Icaque, where Jacques Lafond, Noel Azor, and a third man named

Page led a rebellion, no doubt calling upon their friends, relatives, and clients to play

their part. Not much is known about this rebellion, aside from those contained in a

memoir entitled Precis historique. The author, who was residing in Port-au-Prince during

the early years of the revolution, related that the Fond d'Icaque free coloreds rose up,



29 Testament of Sr. Isaac Delahaye, 10 August 1789, G5-130, JP-N; and Testament of Sr. Joseph Vigneau,
23 December 1781, L6A-23, ibid.

30David Patrick Geggus, Haitian Revolutionary Studies (Bloomington: University of Indiana Press, 2002),
99-102.









apparently in sympathy with other rebels closer to the colonial capital. According to the

author's account, "the blood of the whites flowed in long streams. Nearly 80 whites had

their throats cut. They did not spare the women, not the pregnant Dame Desjourne nor

Dame Plinquet and her little ones." The whites responded with force, arming their slaves

to put down the revolt and never forgiving the free coloreds for the atrocities they held

them to have committed.31

The rebellious brothers-in-law survived the abortive revolt and the subsequent

violence against the gens de couleur. Following the British withdrawal from Jeremie in

1793, Lafond acted as justice of the peace for the commune du Corail, at least for a time.

He was dead by 1797, when his widow rented out his plantation. Our last glimpse of

Azor comes a year earlier, when the officers of the sMndchaussde (operating under the

supervision of the occupying government) auctioned two of his slaves for his part played

in aiding the "enemies of His [Britannic] Majesty."32

Conclusion

Patterns of marriage and other social interaction in the Grande-Anse revolved

around patronage. Godparentage circulated patronage within free colored families,

strengthened bonds between families, and created ties with social inferiors, and marriage

both legitimized consensual relationships and any children born of those relations and

extended ties between families. The Lafond and Atlasse families are examples of

prominent free colored planters who created connections between its members and with

other free coloreds. These connections were ultimately important in the Haitian


31Anonymous, "Precis historique," 1: 64; and David P. Geggus, Slavery, War, and Revolution

32L8-134, JP-N.






76


Revolution, particularly in its early stages, when free coloreds fought against the white

supremacy that had been the colonial status quo.














CHAPTER 5
CONCLUSION

The coffee boom that swept through the highlands of the French colony of Saint-

Domingue in the 1770s and 1780s brought about great social, economic, and

demographic change in its wake. In the quarter de la Grande-Anse on the southern

peninsula, these changes meant an increase in trade with both Europe and other colonial

ports, the massive importation of African slaves to work newly created coffee and mixed-

crop plantations, and a large immigration of settlers from France's Atlantic ports and

Caribbean colonies. The most obscured effect of the boom is its ecological component.

The three major strata of the colonial population-whites, coloreds, and slaves-all

experienced huge increases, but this was a phenomenon felt throughout the colony's

coffee zones. The difference in the Grande-Anse is that whites formed the majority of the

free population, both before the boom and after it began. Though some free coloreds did

make it well as coffee planters, an indeterminate number also operated small market

farms to feed the plantations and the nascent towns. Others competed with whites as

carpenters and other artisans in the building trades to construct the plantation homes,

stores, millhouses, and slave quarters so much in demand.

The number of African slaves imported to work on the coffee plantations also

increased in leaps and bounds during the 1780s, but so did the creole slave population,

which represented over a third of the slave population in our sample presented in Chapter

3. Of the imported slaves, those from West Central Africa predominated, which suggests









the importance of"Congos" to slave culture in the Grande-Anse. We have also discussed,

provisionally, the diet, housing, and family structure of Jeremien coffee slaves.

Finally, in Chapter 3, we discussed marriage patterns and patronage among the free

population, particularly people of color. From the evidence available, it appears that in

the 1780s most marriages in the Grande-Anse were within one's own race. Free coloreds

married free coloreds and whites married whites. One of the interesting issues under

consideration is marriage choice among free coloreds based on the phenotype and

legitimacy of one's spouse. The small sample presented in this chapter suggests that

coloreds married individuals most often married individuals with their own phenotypes or

otherwise those not much lighter or darker than their own. Finally, we considered the

limited evidence for Jeremien colored participation in the Haitian Revolution, both in the

initial revolts in 1793 and the war for independence that lasted 1802-1803.

All of the elements of Jeremien society presented in this thesis are meant to be

preliminary analyses of a region of Saint-Domingue largely neglected by historians until

now. Though by no means the largest or most cosmopolitan of colonial towns, Jeremie

was important for the export of coffee and other tropical commodities through the

island's entrepots and was a significant disembarkation point for the Atlantic slave trade.

Further evidence for Jeremie's commerce lies hidden in the predominant colonial

newspaper, Les Affiches Americaines, awaiting compilation of shipping notices and

coffee prices. The Jeremie Papers, upon which this study is largely based, also promise

more than enough documentation for a social history of the turbulent 1790s, when the

Grande-Anse became a British protectorate for five years. As we have noted in Chapter 1,









it appears that many of the affluent white families stayed on in Jeremie, at least until the

final French withdrawal in 1803.

In perspective, the significance of the Grande-Anse is as a counterpoint to

dominant trends in the rest of the colony. Its free population remained white throughout

the latter half of the eighteenth century, rather than becoming predominantly colored with

the coffee boom. Perhaps in part because of this demographic feature, the quarter

welcomed the British occupation as black and colored revolutionaries threatened white

supremacy. The present work is a seminal effort to understand the history of this

interesting region, but much remains to be done to explain how society developed on one

of Saint-Domingue's internal frontiers.















LIST OF REFERENCES


Primary Sources: Manuscripts

Debien, Gabriel, ed. "Precis historique des annals de la colonie francoise de Saint-
Domingue (Juillet 1789 a Mai 1802): manuscript anonyme." 2 vols. Typescript,
Archives de la Vienne, n.d.

Jeremie Papers, Department of Special and Area Collections, George A. Smathers
Library, University of Florida.

Notaries: L'Epine, Thomas, Girard, Lefrotter.

Greffe: Ecclesiastical Records, 1781

Primary Sources: Contemporary Printed Matter

Barbe-Marbois, Francois. Etat des finances de Saint-Domingue. Paris: Imprimerie
Royale: 1790.

Laborie, Pierre-Joseph. The Coffee Planter of San Domingo. London: T. Cadell and W.
Davies, 1798.

Moreau de Saint-Mery, M. L. E. Description topographique, physique, civil, politique et
historique de la partiefrangaise de l'isle Saint-Domingue. Edited by Blanche
Maurel and Etienne Taillemitte. 3 vols. Paris: Societe de L'Histoire des Colonies
Francaises, 1958.

Secondary Sources

Beckles, Hilary McD. "Sugar and White Servitude: An Analysis of White Indentured
Labor during the Sugar Revolution of Barbados, 1643-1655." Journal of the
Barbados Museum and Historical Society 36, no. 3 (1981): 236-46.

Curto, Jose C. Enslaving Spirits: The Portuguese-Brazilian Alcohol Trade at Luanda and
Its Hinterland, 1550-1830. Leiden: Brill, 2004.

Craton, Michael. Empire, Enslavement and Freedom in the Caribbean. Kingston: Ian
Randle Publishers, 1997.

Curtin, Philip. The Atlantic Slave Trade: A Census. Madison: University of Wisconsin
Press, 1969.






81


Debien, Gabriel. Les esclaves aux Antilles franCaises, XVIIe-XVIIIe siecles. Basse-Terre:
Society d'Histoire de la Guadeloupe, 1974.

Fick, Carolyn. The Making ofHaiti: The Saint Domingue Revolution from Below.
Knoxville: University of Tennessee Press, 1990.

Frostin, Charles. Les revoltes blanches a Saint-Domingue aux XVIIe-XVIIIe siecles.
Paris: L'Ecole, 1975.

Garrigus, John. "Blue and Brown: Contraband Indigo and the Rise of a Free Colored
Planter Class in French Saint Domingue." Americas 50, no. 2 (October 1993): 233-
63.

S"A Struggle for Respect: The Free Coloreds of Saint Domingue, 1770-1779"
Ph.D. diss., Johns Hopkins University, 1989.

Geggus, David P. Haitian Revolutionary Studies. Bloomington: University of Indiana
Press, 2002.

S"Haitian Voodoo in the Eighteenth Century: Language, Culture, Resistance."
Jahrbuch fur Geschichte von Staat, Windschaft und Geschelschaft Weinamerikas
28 (1991): 1-31.

S"Slave and Free Colored Women in Saint Domingue." In David B. Gaspar and
Darlene C. Hine, eds. More than Chattel: Black Women and Slavery in the
Americas, 259-78. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1996.

Slavery, War, and Revolution: The British Occupation of Saint Domingue,
1793-1798. Oxford: Clarendon, 1982.

S"Sugar and Coffee Cultivation in Saint Domingue and the Shaping of the
Slave Labor Force." In Ira Berlin and Philip D. Morgan, eds. Cultivation and
Culture: Labor and the .\lhpmg of Slave Life in the Americas, 73-97.
Charlottesville: University Press of Virginia, 1993.

Higman, B. W. Slave Populations of the British Caribbean, 1807-1834. Baltimore: The
Johns Hopkins University Press, 1984.

James, C. L. R. The Black Jacobins: Toussaint L'Ouverture and the San Domingo
Revolution. New York: Knopf, 1963.

King, Stewart R. Blue Coat or Powdered Wig: Free People of Color in Pre-
Revolutionary Saint Domingue. Athens: University of Georgia Press, 2001.

Kiple, Kenneth F. The Caribbean Slave: A Biological History. Cambridge: Cambridge
University Press, 1984.









and Virginia H. Kiple. "Deficiency Diseases in the Caribbean." Journal of
Interdisciplinary History 11, no. 2 (1980), reprinted in Hilary Beckles and Verene
Shepherd, eds. Caribbean Slave Society and Economy: A Student Reader. New
York: The New Press, 1991.

Klein, Herbert S. "The Colored Militia of Cuba, 1568-1868." Caribbean Studies 6
(1966): 17-27.

McClellan, James E., III. Colonialism and Science: Saint Domingue in the Old Regime.
Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1992.

Miller, Joseph C. Way of Death: Merchant Capitalism and the Angolan Slave Trade,
1730-1830. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press, 1988.

Scott, Daniel. "Underregistration and Bias in Probate Records: An Analysis of Data from
Eighteenth-Century Hingham, Massachusetts." William andMary Quarterly 32,
no. 1 (January 1975): 100-110.

Socolow, Susan. "Economic Roles of the Free Women of Color of Cap Francais." In
David Gaspar and Darlene Hine, eds. More than Chattel: Black Women and
Slavery in the Americas, 279-97. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1996.

Trouillot, Michel-Rolph. "Coffee Planters and Coffee Slaves in the Antilles: The Impact
of a Secondary Crop." In Ira Berlin and Philip D. Morgan, eds. Cultivation and
Culture: Labor and the .\hipmg of Slave Life in the Americas, 124-37.
Charlottesville: University Press of Virginia, 1993.

."Motion in the System: Coffee, Color, and Slavery in Eighteenth-Century
Saint Domingue." Review 8 (Winter 1982): 331-88.

Vovelle, Michel. Piktd baroque et Dichristianisation en Provence au XVIIe siecle. Paris:
Editions du C.T.H.S., 1997.















BIOGRAPHICAL SKETCH

Keith Anthony Manuel was born in Opelousas, Louisiana, in 1981. After

graduating from Port Barre High School in Port Barre, Louisiana, in 1999, Mr. Manuel

attended the University of Louisiana at Lafayette, from which he was graduated with

honors in 2003 with a bachelor of arts in history. He began graduate studies at the

University of Florida in August 2003. After graduating, Mr. Manuel plans to continue his

studies in Latin American and Caribbean history at that institution with the goal of

receiving a doctoral degree. He currently resides in Gainesville, Florida, with his wife

Bridget, his daughter Rebecca, and two small felines.