<%BANNER%>

Effects of Longshore Currents on Rip Currents

xml version 1.0 encoding UTF-8
REPORT xmlns http:www.fcla.edudlsmddaitss xmlns:xsi http:www.w3.org2001XMLSchema-instance xsi:schemaLocation http:www.fcla.edudlsmddaitssdaitssReport.xsd
INGEST IEID E20110113_AAAADB INGEST_TIME 2011-01-13T18:41:28Z PACKAGE UFE0004905_00001
AGREEMENT_INFO ACCOUNT UF PROJECT UFDC
FILES
FILE SIZE 86818 DFID F20110113_AACBLK ORIGIN DEPOSITOR PATH gutierrez_e_Page_038.QC.jpg GLOBAL false PRESERVATION BIT MESSAGE_DIGEST ALGORITHM MD5
47e130c82f1c7d0ec21ae20fb68eea63
SHA-1
c4791a34133afa03171e7d1c982a71f91ce69296
691003 F20110113_AACBKV gutierrez_e_Page_028.jp2
5d84d3a0c5ffaf2d21e468f0937aa35b
a80c4ab69adbb3cb1c1bcc9aa116f3ac59b1e4df
30135 F20110113_AACBLL gutierrez_e_Page_047.pro
471b7e11d80fd8aa4f13ff228b16833f
d1516dfd1ef28dcc4d168425af0e48cb9eaaaae7
10364 F20110113_AACBKW gutierrez_e_Page_093thm.jpg
6c1f1f7f0027caabdb8eff981dee1b78
7ae4ee64b541a538044c9169cc9309732b25f068
19457 F20110113_AACBMA gutierrez_e_Page_032thm.jpg
70231178c6949f487c97af41afda838b
1495e458e75a95606ed2b6454de45f1ecacc56b1
44459 F20110113_AACBLM gutierrez_e_Page_042thm.jpg
5e3e01564462f3397da856be66208db3
93d4992f2049ad592d3b3d63ed4d3c7bc5735476
1053954 F20110113_AACBKX gutierrez_e_Page_035.tif
fc935db405f427fee16845b6d3c8e070
9a62eea88bc69011d953fe59a735809b0cd82e62
43244 F20110113_AACBMB gutierrez_e_Page_055.pro
45d3930e929d030259852d7534d06847
7bc5f7d5363e650d581ac5f615ff8bcdd8ee2995
115371 F20110113_AACBLN gutierrez_e_Page_097.jp2
104c1c2816258d86f78707b779c9fb1d
ee362bf893b97c792dd888341c76a7196502b4b7
72047 F20110113_AACBKY gutierrez_e_Page_021.QC.jpg
f88e5bd8bf8ecab41936008552a52b97
0de24adae7917067d8328010d0620aab6d52a150
25271604 F20110113_AACBMC gutierrez_e_Page_056.tif
915fbe2d799f42f18bb412339672e8b0
45f536e6151f0c7e4e0536306ab0cea25f075141
215570 F20110113_AACBLO gutierrez_e_Page_024.jpg
eb819dfa808c7744fa6c5041f15d1f2b
f07ba3776243d1bb69782d1561e1a9d2ad6bdbbe
208609 F20110113_AACBKZ gutierrez_e_Page_051.jpg
c2965307c06d538496451c19f82a2f71
fbdc99db880446b6554f265ab6413946a4fc4913
181892 F20110113_AACBMD gutierrez_e_Page_078.jpg
fefd2a2a52fe262964464e8c12b50a3d
5ed9cd4e228532e668c342c9a8f92b9a8dcb906f
73838 F20110113_AACBLP gutierrez_e_Page_045.QC.jpg
46dc4d57ffbf7a8e5360079da6c76605
fbfd43df653381f620e63a7cfea8e3cf532cd7bf
25870 F20110113_AACBME gutierrez_e_Page_013thm.jpg
80932044e7be2d40c29935fa73fa1198
707956a57372b8b7cc6c3bcb1ac3370fbb61a78b
79197 F20110113_AACBLQ gutierrez_e_Page_031.jp2
dc9a8e87f634665bef44b30dd28036f7
0014e8013bdcc5545819826e86af340e6e6b23cc
242581 F20110113_AACBMF gutierrez_e_Page_054.jpg
f89b496440422df2605fa4a3158a955a
e907ada10466a1ba71c38f8f45f99ad252763c27
98240 F20110113_AACBLR gutierrez_e_Page_045.jp2
5cac6ffa0e21c6469054bf8c3b9654bc
a07e4080d8ea03be670483319b4b2cec3770a11f
190249 F20110113_AACBMG gutierrez_e_Page_035.jpg
6e321cd2cf273c5c5e65f594379e3a11
b0fea80985ff72863ede8b41bae8f4204745fdf1
862918 F20110113_AACBLS gutierrez_e_Page_038.jp2
b565fea103019225afed83d45c63c180
b0cb27f1a0c8ecb9d72e093352b07c6f760947ce
49956 F20110113_AACBMH gutierrez_e_Page_058thm.jpg
bad7d982bf151e81c0c6ed22b3a9abb1
f5b45253367b790dfd10f6cdc51c6a6ccb1b5fdd
20943 F20110113_AACBLT gutierrez_e_Page_092.pro
3763867abd796847d043490aadb70e2a
24f359881a952bc37c726f8c18bc2c27350a8e36
1883 F20110113_AACBMI gutierrez_e_Page_015.txt
80364ccbc3878b9c5c7fe34cbdc918d8
4b4ac00e43db96b94be7ccd350ab7a4126776d96
F20110113_AACBMJ gutierrez_e_Page_097.tif
04855baeb90a2e0bd97fb84694959391
998ec016cdb93123f677cca2a04be2303b98405e
1250 F20110113_AACBLU gutierrez_e_Page_048.txt
c8921cf847f8f02aa5db5ffe8e89b9f5
80de98db458a5f45d94575dc8f6f473e737751d9
1051985 F20110113_AACBMK gutierrez_e_Page_057.jp2
760d1c5b02a64a98bf54101b1baca52a
c8025315793627eb2a409520b70efb30d2902aa5
76356 F20110113_AACBLV gutierrez_e_Page_027.QC.jpg
cf28b33d79c3c2745ddb7d981cc9e825
4e88a76c2de6048ee3c0d940273f69d8ace5242a
1012479 F20110113_AACBML gutierrez_e_Page_060.jp2
a8a852c3f5d9089c9d441ddee4d332ff
ee04b335db6710edbbecc113d1d11ee1e4d561ca
F20110113_AACBLW gutierrez_e_Page_026.tif
b7329a8071e2b3b3b216b97d620544f4
599fbca7135554e9144880a9f690a1b09cb0f678
25842 F20110113_AACBMM gutierrez_e_Page_068thm.jpg
b5ff83c42f198ad1e7b4155726e9e878
eb2030d3753d93cc5c963a4e3cf44d0f7ab25781
1032604 F20110113_AACBLX gutierrez_e_Page_087.jp2
d816f71834bcb10581fc334a02dbb861
74a6103163cf51eea51f300c72c4ab5b55877c7f
17268 F20110113_AACBNA gutierrez_e_Page_090.pro
30190bd63a54cd011bc974c0aa3097a4
61f244a7b4bf583b1bfb486bc77a2668b4d2c6f1
33131 F20110113_AACBMN gutierrez_e_Page_005thm.jpg
c885297a1d2dbc811d1d6800485f293d
7c7ca278e2aa48e569b6fbd56608d852dcb391a7
67012 F20110113_AACBLY gutierrez_e_Page_008.pro
b354c32038a91dfd3b023d0687c976e4
46c55910938b2bdb004f5addb82ef99c617d5c69
975291 F20110113_AACBNB gutierrez_e_Page_073.jp2
0d2e93ff296d4927d71621da55d85768
4214fcf5db3156cc75b7448f22dd6ca24b93c3d7
217149 F20110113_AACBMO gutierrez_e_Page_040.jpg
14b8aa08ca6531277a7bfd470c1a6cb8
f21fd922b0038321d3715f1a93c886c40d5f089e
6462 F20110113_AACBLZ gutierrez_e_Page_002.jp2
53700a7417648e1a009a25399a613dd0
9a4d9ea9959223fbba35e0b3d25cdc1508fa976d
1197 F20110113_AACBNC gutierrez_e_Page_003.txt
4300f2c78c377f6803bf6a26889429d1
994a7e21441b3b534623609a7971f678d3cf6cc2
147615 F20110113_AACBMP gutierrez_e_Page_052.jpg
c628041cb62b8c286c4749311fab79c5
1874c94789c3b4da3d791d7bb810e27782b01c21
226351 F20110113_AACBND gutierrez_e_Page_050.jpg
1be06daab7f9bc2fdcdc8be438cb63c7
8a0634e6ea2719153759dcbf98a7c2a8cff36607
20383 F20110113_AACBMQ gutierrez_e_Page_093.pro
466372270a6048f4375584c738cb9842
02e556755fec4743547b17c1b83523aedb614f68
923 F20110113_AACBNE gutierrez_e_Page_091.txt
d9e90762c0c0df342ff9710e37232a53
58a5415d5e67bb540b6119e659bf880a50c920e0
85160 F20110113_AACBMR gutierrez_e_Page_061.QC.jpg
743266b05de2d44702786e3e4793653f
e5fec02e5924d39afc3d99789e55cae013013292
119797 F20110113_AACBNF gutierrez_e_Page_006.jpg
69e25a96a9a781c47a279d942937ecd3
0750c5bb98c287e17e1f61a9aee40a9d7d0ad450
981250 F20110113_AACBMS gutierrez_e_Page_074.jp2
3b247f76337770242f02a3e745d0bced
089490e0d689ad08d7f6f2b2ebf477a8c99cc03c
180025 F20110113_AACBNG gutierrez_e_Page_010.jpg
10402febfaa8a560f2b33235bd2d3ad6
595acf9fb88831fea75c4c3cdd4ab0fe8eb7ecf8
F20110113_AACBMT gutierrez_e_Page_007.tif
f8546c478c49ed631a6f90cb224861de
9184010ad0026e7b6edd1e286131ed8d38ab22ed
48325 F20110113_AACBNH gutierrez_e_Page_056thm.jpg
efa4e45794e56d39f504b36207b97d39
91193bceb18dcb2d8287f1d5a9ae8d0627ac9a53
171036 F20110113_AACBMU gutierrez_e_Page_026.jpg
7de40f0df6d1ec67c47d5fae30e99c51
12f36dfdd192b1c1882c4e97d41303ae5f155095
2011 F20110113_AACBNI gutierrez_e_Page_068.txt
d312c9a073120c7019169fb7104a60f9
fdd70ae4fe8aa03d187f69f29a38c0a4311518a8
F20110113_AACBNJ gutierrez_e_Page_085.tif
d72a57365cd858009c42c8f5f1deecbe
f4a535a123b61ba5480e9d8b738f28d9f24b970d
1319 F20110113_AACBMV gutierrez_e_Page_050.txt
13508e50f601df204d883a4fb3874ed3
6eb290335858638a907ec415ae0a9d4d4bf0c54f
56901 F20110113_AACBNK gutierrez_e_Page_099.pro
6d04f313744b988e59a9dc6477477f84
a055a76a1f923b5da7b524b7f83ae5d68b878280
180298 F20110113_AACBMW gutierrez_e_Page_046.jpg
3bf0e2cce79c5b684d60ee9dd8e98197
107891e89109b99296aad98bc0301b122792d092
85762 F20110113_AACBNL gutierrez_e_Page_081.QC.jpg
a9fd61d5b8193d088a4546b77facbf79
207b06beaed11591add2b4bbc6f249be9f2613e6
1827 F20110113_AACBMX gutierrez_e_Page_036.txt
7ad5a8485296feb683fa48bccab7bec7
50de8c22406e871a077d64d05d5213240baf9565
105508 F20110113_AACBOA gutierrez_e_Page_044.QC.jpg
888e714fa38665c700c80f9815d015aa
cd21114f9645c2d99e6ad8961c4215adbd9a7efc
960304 F20110113_AACBNM gutierrez_e_Page_086.jp2
061bfca70242b7f699dc57a30b317d35
fd16306bcdd0df5ff64eeec66b9100af340e8170
F20110113_AACBMY gutierrez_e_Page_092.tif
8924440fcbb72d9d436c8bdec4eb41ad
896d3e9edb50b0f8bd0e84b7786a517b3887cd9a
186511 F20110113_AACBOB gutierrez_e_Page_034.jpg
d2423cd18e323fe4f99243d759e99e5c
dcd64385819391670ffbb777ce8f4d179a08b2ea
27490 F20110113_AACBNN gutierrez_e_Page_049.pro
6c3f0463d92f26dd6e98d1743e5285d4
0ed0146619a80ecf3dd79ec16a068ff27b38c853
988 F20110113_AACBMZ gutierrez_e_Page_083.txt
09aa56c43856aee38c139b4e5322e42f
57d3e35fcae6feedbbd7ab5b98edab40c9256b4a
18375 F20110113_AACBOC gutierrez_e_Page_085.pro
03fd5a7c69879a2c7fcd370e8e1a0783
87e3a4d16a041458ab8aecc52d39a2cbc1c99395
2036868 F20110113_AACBNO gutierrez_e.pdf
006043c15dcc82ee3a4b8429a9371632
c421a5fd83c4908c1eb1a92d72aeceb4483c8301
36535 F20110113_AACBOD gutierrez_e_Page_064thm.jpg
451c1610b5f59f11c960b3dcd05dbbe0
f14e0c5e909d6621b6ac4f44fdd9cfb0a538d5b7
565 F20110113_AACBNP gutierrez_e_Page_009.txt
5777344f018731bf30ca8297fc79d2c4
aea387ed2d3b4fb00d54fd40ea158b361aa6fe62
103970 F20110113_AACBOE gutierrez_e_Page_054.QC.jpg
0d56fa12ac2e760c76520a10f88b50af
62cf178980c7fc51bfb543c7218ab44ebe47ba5a
2471 F20110113_AACBNQ gutierrez_e_Page_007.txt
c52407654f604b2647f213e91acf2e37
cd8d79a3b4e094bf2a40ecfa6eede0844cc10d0c
86105 F20110113_AACBOF gutierrez_e_Page_049.QC.jpg
1ef2f32d2bcaf8a2467f0a3936327981
1b6edf32d52572f2f5fad45550c07a83c539b012
18643 F20110113_AACBNR gutierrez_e_Page_086.pro
71b16ef04b6dee42342dbe34ffd5ef4a
fe63d9d673e6b2dd8d9f042550467f33bbd3fa12
29130 F20110113_AACBOG gutierrez_e_Page_034.pro
810b42c22f7ec8e18f03f92335d48818
844b36b6ac474f41ec735b10dac915c0c3b453e8
87298 F20110113_AACBNS gutierrez_e_Page_092.jpg
f8bc295235a8d66f386cf3c673d658ab
9545b44462dd64eac6f449aa9fe14cd3dcc3ba1f
44825 F20110113_AACBOH gutierrez_e_Page_077thm.jpg
c63fe9f19de614f56d088f0a6a7b16e7
7917edc92da2a4828e1451797753848c5f7ee701
1048 F20110113_AACBNT gutierrez_e_Page_062.txt
9e98c52b8c6ecef65e037ce7f79653af
718450ba866791b44bdff0f294d2f47162aca35c
5968 F20110113_AACBOI gutierrez_e_Page_025thm.jpg
11ce4aa83eea1a3ec3587cea439f173a
2b6587eee2941a6c305f5457408ba56fb2b63651
2644 F20110113_AACBNU gutierrez_e_Page_008.txt
07a38c1c1adfb881ed777f21e09ac649
c83fc2208dce0d2b9d7f6effd0a9b54dd7d3c80f
76090 F20110113_AACBOJ gutierrez_e_Page_041.QC.jpg
c9cb8b5f10a7f5b76a7b78e8d6e5e71c
c476a5ce503b5945002a47a02406c33b155efb43
44914 F20110113_AACBNV gutierrez_e_Page_073thm.jpg
cc21628575bf53ebe22edeb5a067cf85
76c015680c9d9f46174391a61e35f89a1b614bbe
190365 F20110113_AACBOK gutierrez_e_Page_038.jpg
31de474715e988b418384093d2954352
b51d5b7dc7ae40ad52ede89cd86bb987959a82df
84446 F20110113_AACBOL gutierrez_e_Page_084.QC.jpg
2eccf7cf429154aef260c934f2760af1
395f0ff77a9f40c8a097e44d68d65612122fbdbf
29250 F20110113_AACBNW gutierrez_e_Page_092.QC.jpg
dfabb0c9414d2364c67cba6a94271c6a
a6e95bbb5b6edf6f72aa84664364bd05841996e3
1825 F20110113_AACBPA gutierrez_e_Page_041.txt
3d8f68bbac801b1853e5737c2d82b2fb
bea10d7fc0ab07e8c9aa2a1111686ee8c9a80ddf
84205 F20110113_AACBOM gutierrez_e_Page_098.QC.jpg
3cce72c96e8bd45a13ef515eee4f0c79
dbf3e925d5febec97a5b64cca06d1cd9baadac90
14223 F20110113_AACBNX gutierrez_e_Page_009.pro
d95b4b8aa95b5a081d9256451970f0ac
96b76ecf3efc46ebc10a8af21e17ba5fc2bdb920
33577 F20110113_AACBPB gutierrez_e_Page_057.pro
1af498ad52d8fa20a569bcdc02ec82e5
a49125bcdad90f7f801a6c93d0d42b1fd007226a
6241 F20110113_AACBON gutierrez_e_Page_002.QC.jpg
99cab03c5a6f77c2eb1dd6e468447ad0
f9b2c19fb2c9f783fd837198648421ab48a9babe
F20110113_AACBNY gutierrez_e_Page_080.tif
6c2efdf13fff62aed9e28f9988bebcf2
3131c74d7296d6542d33b49b3477444822cacb2a
192586 F20110113_AACBOO gutierrez_e_Page_042.jpg
f6f4b489f61837c971e4cc80d8b55477
c927612d6fc48774d8c4d225e484c32385288457
172605 F20110113_AACBNZ gutierrez_e_Page_039.jpg
0349ffd696875e37d4b1a521a7eb09ad
2f0031630720c2654d45b1c1ec7d6dfb3ac3d538
110299 F20110113_AACBPC gutierrez_e_Page_022.jp2
95cd744e3c5a93c7a2695f90ff556d8f
0f27d1ed86c971f668b4d7ceaf0a7cfe435fd9b3
98151 F20110113_AACBOP gutierrez_e_Page_005.jpg
3b90dcb6d09b24bb285bb89bdfae53e7
9800ff0838a95b3cc91ac50dfde7baefad996f7c
80889 F20110113_AACBPD gutierrez_e_Page_068.QC.jpg
3368a8ee63d85980cd74a28ece65b38e
e75468d30ec0b1c518afeff3c1b8845f1c7eb076
3299 F20110113_AACBOQ gutierrez_e_Page_004.txt
359631d185e401cc9943ec1795c5dd79
fa74b5451ec80b6339c5c51fee41818a58680353
84921 F20110113_AACBPE gutierrez_e_Page_088.QC.jpg
eb4ad274530b6e271a0704614362469f
08448cbe17b565ac619a8780d5c89f97cf2ae344
44708 F20110113_AACBOR gutierrez_e_Page_084thm.jpg
a27c5f8c9cc2988bf501a422b61d88a7
fd16d308ec8a0da9d3549d0f0fb362cbc750b94b
45025 F20110113_AACBPF gutierrez_e_Page_076thm.jpg
8f38dd40422b00248655b3f234126368
b88f72d47528c058dc86bfc31ea9d106395af39c
1051948 F20110113_AACBOS gutierrez_e_Page_040.jp2
e9b0c1cddeff6644da96f856d4d6824d
440ecda895c3f3f01b6123e61cd9a0b2c872f2a3
23629 F20110113_AACBPG gutierrez_e_Page_045thm.jpg
1f7273b81ba1f477df7fd200793c1dc3
7af623e6184eb401ddfc60e5c6b767d42a2f92ac
1034 F20110113_AACBOT gutierrez_e_Page_080.txt
336baf20e78c958ed70edd4b262ceaa6
b5f189774ac9bf2fa38f258ae408619e8e8c4087
F20110113_AACBPH gutierrez_e_Page_082.tif
9156d53e06e5abccce6143e024f156c6
90695bb7d05aad28be4a563f5982c5a77e65b759
45220 F20110113_AACBOU gutierrez_e_Page_034thm.jpg
348966ccfc19c4ebf14a04aa6d7b3968
c8bbf4e9d04f92ec019618a54bdffbf1b20c6dad
179899 F20110113_AACBPI gutierrez_e_Page_074.jpg
46f8251ff5ed1f1af543ff05be5f8ddd
56f025f4985a73e82564a4706e52a9f5c6a2aa81
108042 F20110113_AACBOV gutierrez_e_Page_051.jp2
9f4eea2c1db9b9abe3ae7fd05233c431
c0b808c7faa9e1408257dfe571517a428574d6ba
25216 F20110113_AACBPJ gutierrez_e_Page_018.pro
d5021aeabf59c1addcd6564d7064f8cc
73b8a31347f0d0e98d0db186055654a662222108
F20110113_AACBOW gutierrez_e_Page_096.tif
030c640602f50d0d5360c00d3cb0e2b8
7d5513f6891249f572c6ebe53ecab41543749992
F20110113_AACBPK gutierrez_e_Page_022.tif
c25b8ab6147c1688865fac1acdd941e8
a3aa406ce4188966b670350c53637fafdb20396d
187059 F20110113_AACBPL gutierrez_e_Page_048.jpg
24dc48732328d02fd5e774715e832fd3
0bf92c86e5571da9f310d34a9d26a915fb34be3d
18197 F20110113_AACBOX gutierrez_e_Page_077.pro
92976801ceb127f32cac4d174d0443cb
f8ff0a6090797d41745c306515c51955329cb88c
68984 F20110113_AACBQA gutierrez_e_Page_043.QC.jpg
d3f5fc9a6bf6302b49eda7c7fa0e438c
caf5bcc194c216f7c7277c370a796e082f6b9e30
96766 F20110113_AACBPM gutierrez_e_Page_004.QC.jpg
5c6e6186d85f6a2343130e19dec56759
faddb6845fe376e4f8bbc45e0f9f72ab42c42b9f
45852 F20110113_AACBOY gutierrez_e_Page_004thm.jpg
e2c581045f9d105e05d600f6ddbde9eb
c99d877c0cb6692b05813c47fe1194a004011eec
F20110113_AACBQB gutierrez_e_Page_017.tif
96e4ccdf7d0f78823860b456ec3d1a91
0ee1603b263f012f1fce3b5632cb41c198b41ea9
43898 F20110113_AACBPN gutierrez_e_Page_035.pro
1f98c55bcb625280528536acd0e09a96
6b996eb7329ac68eb6293f99fb59504e95fdf51b
50702 F20110113_AACBOZ gutierrez_e_Page_069.jpg
de7bdb04cf320d8e9cf9006405b2b079
4571e1dea8592c4193fbecf2785343a501b09918
44001 F20110113_AACBQC gutierrez_e_Page_028thm.jpg
51d7e625b1287c3e46399ef35694dc9e
1b4d4b23205bf4ad9c37b5ff9d4851ba77b6d75a
2026 F20110113_AACBPO gutierrez_e_Page_024.txt
eb09d289e6f3ec40d79b4f9947fb91a2
9e55d72e5205dd995a8ebdf6415938941e04e379
16075 F20110113_AACBQD gutierrez_e_Page_084.pro
aea9efc819130a8894c084c776154034
48d66240c6ba8a63da0f43e815084e100b3457c3
992547 F20110113_AACBPP gutierrez_e_Page_075.jp2
8f40da6110fd855672b3e917a291c3a4
18cbb2a2f7ebe651558badd657658da2af6b3ba0
F20110113_AACBQE gutierrez_e_Page_050.tif
91273fff5306608aa4ddd30c78fea605
57533ecab1cdd472a8a647de23fd3e35bcbdb032
43139 F20110113_AACBPQ gutierrez_e_Page_053.pro
8d53484cca209ed267c16f9ff64a8d7b
43837773e8f7d1a9b20aa03897b7ceeea31553d8
F20110113_AACBQF gutierrez_e_Page_051.tif
52b92a6d7bf86a0152e72d7c31408d34
ef0e9f8dee4c25744450c32b441079ef228d360b
1732 F20110113_AACBPR gutierrez_e_Page_029.txt
36fba04cd93ffacd71e6b09e7f200b54
d76e848b42c058d3af1e808a529a0842ea732bf6
F20110113_AACBQG gutierrez_e_Page_072.tif
65ee3fde90b89166995bcd4b8456993b
113b9f33d04b1ef65e0c39e61cf0c370cdee0065
F20110113_AACBPS gutierrez_e_Page_071.tif
c7defe984a05ac04b058db7019e8ad2e
472335a58253191c217aa3b5381456033c6f2c37
44853 F20110113_AACBQH gutierrez_e_Page_086thm.jpg
714238e128ec176d427448e540d69032
893ea09784a7478c6bb36079d9e5aa8599d56e87
44558 F20110113_AACBPT gutierrez_e_Page_048thm.jpg
394f11f228d1fa2631ee24381b1b3e22
4a7b68d86673484a3cde4c6c029031a89dd1a73b
886 F20110113_AACBQI gutierrez_e_Page_084.txt
4ff69934628395685ff8daf62ab57359
00f0ec59ab4622a6ae352d0c9bc126c421f72fd5
64762 F20110113_AACBPU gutierrez_e_Page_010.QC.jpg
55683165ab651691cd8041ef17e32c14
c31df8126c9615122553e4ccba45af99827cb45b
F20110113_AACBQJ gutierrez_e_Page_094.tif
6fe7f15db26730626daa5a7f819dbce4
5bce8ac81f64b12e746f7a8dd8819043deb1c335
966683 F20110113_AACBPV gutierrez_e_Page_072.jp2
d2dfaa9070710068383fb2007a2237e6
f041473172658575871839aa60eca3646a66f6ed
16054 F20110113_AACBQK gutierrez_e_Page_089.pro
0b2062cd1f668ee02cf7ff81e79e3f7e
9ae1f37d6812b88cc9005ca61bf82030c4e57724
F20110113_AACBPW gutierrez_e_Page_009.tif
dcf54fef1c70b6d6440005b44a3e9abc
1665663231ac71a2ae7e042ae3d24281a3d6d692
1051953 F20110113_AACBQL gutierrez_e_Page_056.jp2
0c23647dc2e172e02056596309c9c308
361bf319ff140691ab2f736183339563dfa3c140
856172 F20110113_AACBPX gutierrez_e_Page_048.jp2
4a535b7e56b9bd1c91d6d45e3b5d0b91
fcebe5b5421f078f813768e9e95c8ba80f7ddf92
F20110113_AACBRA gutierrez_e_Page_004.tif
3061d912c80bd1e27bc70e082cdfa95f
396df62837bd1fbd5c41b256df7c2f31d3b8f0f8
32228 F20110113_AACBQM gutierrez_e_Page_093.jp2
ba640219c5ba3ccf6e4db97910f691b7
ae1d3e9cbf39e29fedc1e853436d766aabd4cede
F20110113_AACBRB gutierrez_e_Page_100.tif
e662dc3d7bb50c2e27bde2476f62b08b
91985f36546a6750982f2892c02badc3388d0b56
75070 F20110113_AACBQN gutierrez_e_Page_036.QC.jpg
7425285294cad197323445ec5d34846a
19ee9c8feb9dbf107ff7b63531e88e43debcfe5d
88723 F20110113_AACBPY gutierrez_e_Page_010.jp2
a6beefa0ff2e7a02f356251a7f56cdd9
ce7eab43c423aee8c29025c09d3861527b0d4a8a
1942 F20110113_AACBRC gutierrez_e_Page_051.txt
4f9e1893c656599714f5379708688b63
535b4d3a4a033a03aba2ffabf721a659eefa3a7d
1723 F20110113_AACBQO gutierrez_e_Page_055.txt
e3477dcbc275fc045e760ddd5afb58d0
c4b19108cc70035f0177643b19a216b4add28eb1
977833 F20110113_AACBPZ gutierrez_e_Page_077.jp2
458d28e0e77cce375325c29bedb54487
d53124ab04d186626cfdf30aee0dd23e639cb14b
181960 F20110113_AACBRD gutierrez_e_Page_086.jpg
a6d71f9ef88abeb43b97a05c8305f412
e855fe70aa3e4ccec6c0465be6eedba4142acdeb
45635 F20110113_AACBQP gutierrez_e_Page_070thm.jpg
f5bfd126a1bf2775d13e37a8ac063e30
347f1e8d2b5f4afdb3faffa6eb1eac9c1753a6f4
190534 F20110113_AACBRE gutierrez_e_Page_043.jpg
8dc748cda67ab798ddbc494baa270474
85dfc88b26d5dde50287698bee92ecda27c20648
225347 F20110113_AACBQQ gutierrez_e_Page_014.jpg
56ad11e6ffb6a3ec62af0e51143316ea
1d52f66be00e40a524488c80831779be53132ede
46217 F20110113_AACBRF gutierrez_e_Page_040thm.jpg
c259f1b90ac6b277fffea35efe3cb743
565ff64f52e27cc7c14243d190c40aff7d380ea9
965 F20110113_AACBQR gutierrez_e_Page_081.txt
a7d6732931ffb41b0f9078d9f1bd8ac0
22025d486bc6552b4622703014a6d6d9c6be8b15
F20110113_AACBRG gutierrez_e_Page_033.tif
4bb8dbfc217df6cf2a62a0fad190de5d
4678b0cccd16c20c5f9b75b1eaed124293899fa3
84654 F20110113_AACBQS gutierrez_e_Page_094.jpg
1af1c01c835e0750f8c5f3a814847968
850682be8cfb3e938a89303f797b094de4f4f4ad
98245 F20110113_AACBRH gutierrez_e_Page_056.QC.jpg
74e76f397808bd2818dbb43cc773b6e6
3057d098466349076517ce92703848bdf437562d
93897 F20110113_AACBQT gutierrez_e_Page_040.QC.jpg
d311ceea1ac63366b8bce8f901284e88
2d90aa80607bdb7a8c60779beb6883dae38d270d
44827 F20110113_AACBRI gutierrez_e_Page_074thm.jpg
88dc1610b70635e7b544c280617d0cc7
a4a186d559142c220009166568ceac00a438ce84
195042 F20110113_AACBQU gutierrez_e_Page_036.jpg
9038827fdffcc1bf3fcfd4b8854162d3
5c8eabbd9a4069eeea869078fdafa818c9e8cfa6
26644 F20110113_AACBRJ gutierrez_e_Page_050.pro
75672e8511f42afde96e4529c5cc2e9f
6be6e1230888fd398917d63648c75e8d29b83a8a
198550 F20110113_AACBQV gutierrez_e_Page_096.jpg
0a3bb9810f26d7f6e0fc570f4faf236e
a786e722d8b5d339bde8d197205a53dcf177eb5a
1363 F20110113_AACBRK gutierrez_e_Page_092.txt
ffa51242c3eeccf9fca50cdd9d533dd8
7c9e8cd7f6b3a199a280ed15400f2975fc9b10be
84496 F20110113_AACBQW gutierrez_e_Page_076.QC.jpg
74e2251351da32b96dbf4fcb88fa2c1f
d154d7c69f681a71d0620ac1de463724115b675a
F20110113_AACBRL gutierrez_e_Page_032.tif
6c25e3786c1b607db764e7d4e691a877
d3a55f88ce4382b735b3f41af6d635d63aa99bf8
F20110113_AACBQX gutierrez_e_Page_099.tif
a98cc5ca1cc6408453e098323712968d
eaadcd0194b968a0137c663c17d1a31805523cd6
100157 F20110113_AACBRM gutierrez_e_Page_027.jp2
5a3b575beb2f919213e5c45e9dd57ed6
94847f25270ecf341dacadbe727ca1efb688a35d
46085 F20110113_AACBQY gutierrez_e_Page_023thm.jpg
ddeb2cedf888c2f68d0b51d7461abb2a
68998c7526b5cfd14664b49fc951dbada277f7ba
48394 F20110113_AACBSA gutierrez_e_Page_049thm.jpg
5d36ca5c875cc5c4bc4bdf1212848ac0
9452770af3699ddd64fffc97a8cf1b0eca268f23
51611 F20110113_AACBRN gutierrez_e_Page_054thm.jpg
4721718d48a2911bef1aa31fc80214a3
b0b6e57dfe47a24849d2d1c388fa9d208bd7b181
F20110113_AACBSB gutierrez_e_Page_016.tif
871c74aff291d6342b7ae4119ea1a56c
c731e1190e5a13b1e839c9459212f2d52bd60aac
7219 F20110113_AACBRO gutierrez_e_Page_001.pro
e9240ee1bb7062ab5d7b796f20475ea6
79572b362e5479af5598893fd3c022554136042d
179143 F20110113_AACBQZ gutierrez_e_Page_073.jpg
7093f66230bcd232d216f1617ec23ddf
bb77e0e3c7865a3b2a5fde86b29e777b89c36a31
84692 F20110113_AACBSC gutierrez_e_Page_074.QC.jpg
1d57eea9b95e80e1a62604bcdee12ba1
d27e4b4e1178cf7c6327a444f929f787decf7f56
17196 F20110113_AACBRP gutierrez_e_Page_088.pro
23676277f20c85cea7216b55c3aa2423
06722d942d5af8ba4edf64c21310fc47b6959bd8
205694 F20110113_AACBSD gutierrez_e_Page_059.jpg
133f72021c77f1bc55fb4e15a2943337
58629911c8f700771037d8105031ffb9c1859676
F20110113_AACBRQ gutierrez_e_Page_036.tif
9cad936ba61977c7e504438ae02a1854
60ff5988330abf34ab7ed478232cbf1814b0ff7e
19159 F20110113_AACBSE gutierrez_e_Page_037.pro
41eb0c641d512561f72978891a15cd2b
fa58ba3f4575eee63f5c5db1dc88788aa170cbb0
F20110113_AACBRR gutierrez_e_Page_095.tif
64e27bc1c8b61626486591b149beb81d
20623aedc7f933f07eab6c9ac1b5422e9f14a149
40090 F20110113_AACBSF gutierrez_e_Page_056.pro
f4dab87252b9df4e2734d049e77c176a
dcf358d0eb3e41c0273334284e7b2b8dc1232927
F20110113_AACBRS gutierrez_e_Page_037.tif
2f83ba40dfe440a4e5fcfc09f5e16c82
ecf917fe5f856506797bf5bdc60cfafe87a75f68
20623 F20110113_AACBSG gutierrez_e_Page_094.pro
0452e14589c35a72342025f71da36339
501704f862fe2c03b0e747eccb4593fc797604d3
108001 F20110113_AACBRT gutierrez_e_Page_067.jp2
ea556b78558429a6e8a3502f8c6a7cdc
8aaff75f6593a1642c227a5abcfc707a3862dd26
F20110113_AACBSH gutierrez_e_Page_066.tif
44a83d56508be6123849d7ed2567fcb7
f56ac9c5ae550819509cc678702bc1616b23c601
F20110113_AACBRU gutierrez_e_Page_049.tif
f5ca46d8731c1c485d3899eff9945eeb
47a6fe363f0025926c3127fa581ee270cf20d12d
1040414 F20110113_AACBSI gutierrez_e_Page_049.jp2
630e23ff2e7f208bac4cb3719679fded
2d8903aefaa5ea177a976a90bf452e729d9c59ee
42294 F20110113_AACBRV gutierrez_e_Page_039thm.jpg
c3dc0a7fcf5b9ebf2aa76426f80bfd3d
dd83651133565b5aaa08ea2d54bc370daca1909f
47591 F20110113_AACBSJ gutierrez_e_Page_021.pro
3d08bd5618210d30611152922c484c7f
20e9936cddc67e438f17f207b5167800e7109034
29152 F20110113_AACBRW gutierrez_e_Page_039.pro
27f884a5bcf344fed0ce575d78f3e74d
fc45ce1d898288ee528c0ce91b4f899d0918ab66
37913 F20110113_AACBSK gutierrez_e_Page_032.pro
da7a1fe496fddf41cdb7929f7e7e5278
8c6726e46f8c45f47a8d3e4a82c13a520f7eba7c
F20110113_AACBRX gutierrez_e_Page_061.tif
464de89bd96c62fbe83c39420aec0360
b9ef9ff3c24bb67d49114ad51cf9d5843a4bd84d
977 F20110113_AACBSL gutierrez_e_Page_005.txt
bdbf1c6629161c7e318a0eb964e4cad0
c9f0b3312d1f56d2987d0be403c4632c985ea4c1
45092 F20110113_AACBRY gutierrez_e_Page_057thm.jpg
84e3837d7e50bc935bebe4d5183e08eb
82e20adabaa36d22d99076a0127ca02fb0b2b867
181302 F20110113_AACBTA gutierrez_e_Page_075.jpg
aca0353e70c18c70b0866e8397dc04f6
02938a7c2c8db392338446de3314ff36ee41745b
F20110113_AACBSM gutierrez_e_Page_025.tif
a8ee330c2b26784df17b865e267ccd38
26a6c3106e43b6701a7cda54ed5be057f8561184
F20110113_AACBRZ gutierrez_e_Page_083.tif
ecc537a9253ac36790d57c221db6ad0d
6aec14eb5764cbc7ae45c9362de5fa3d4b743d5b
F20110113_AACBTB gutierrez_e_Page_010.tif
4548f57feb49351ce7ea1eb4ba310328
5ac6711376a4b8e29bfe9eb2d4b2a79ddb4b409e
29346 F20110113_AACBSN gutierrez_e_Page_048.pro
b33eddffe50a5e87d6b02f1d714a1c1e
1a7064101ff8e2bd95eaec340135058d3847ed67
49536 F20110113_AACBTC gutierrez_e_Page_067.pro
c16025f507268ef8e952e5f366824b66
eb287adb92742945b6e6e5dc453e59f168da2a53
17134 F20110113_AACBSO gutierrez_e_Page_003thm.jpg
5e850099cf6bc4203ec7072a898aa028
558ede50ff0cdff5b2ba032a3402bda4adb4393a
59421 F20110113_AACBTD gutierrez_e_Page_031.QC.jpg
34c017445b2ab84e1523aa62f2002142
3612f478c5825df943cc5bc0280d51ffab5a6ffa
1348 F20110113_AACBSP gutierrez_e_Page_094.txt
d89ed2462eba625755f621618cd3ba8b
2131d192bc97996462a5fde130250204b6d5ad22
1312 F20110113_AACBTE gutierrez_e_Page_039.txt
b8f313bc3777e03a8d8fd9f0afdfbc88
0c8b2279b90b0e0c4ac59184fddb6d38317f07f5
23680 F20110113_AACBSQ gutierrez_e_Page_022thm.jpg
dcac4ca2140da6cc9151ca0913703e53
ea9eb0bb0692e5f7f04f3721a747516e216065a5
85303 F20110113_AACBTF gutierrez_e_Page_083.QC.jpg
aedfb89ecd6ccbd97aaa91ff1167344b
ca8f402f21658350a216205502870572bc987a8c
F20110113_AACBSR gutierrez_e_Page_013.tif
46fc74b44df5d7ed5fcd8dc92a777a8d
3b8b0bf91045ffac6656187619f0a8266f7347e1
25891 F20110113_AACBTG gutierrez_e_Page_019thm.jpg
71360a0db9e4cde86299ccfa891cacee
e13acb06ed2c583ca329be611ed133a4f82006bd
F20110113_AACBSS gutierrez_e_Page_069.tif
18a58c9a193e2251e2e8b78cb2bc7367
9aea0ae1821b156b0daa013b4c7fd746831b46aa
242843 F20110113_AACBTH gutierrez_e_Page_098.jpg
fa7bfb6bdc88629777719a70368982b0
e938d72ee05c59e2d499b326acd2e9350553c724
1051933 F20110113_AACBST gutierrez_e_Page_007.jp2
06e0a211400eeb28080ecf59ae9b0645
c3f9f808961ac1ae05112869daecaa0645e3bf08
19891 F20110113_AACBTI gutierrez_e_Page_026thm.jpg
c186658c20af8ab1829411b820b71509
983c308a110d9a941bad00c60838937a203888b9
21994 F20110113_AACBSU gutierrez_e_Page_029thm.jpg
45856d3fb1db9e60e89e21db2edadd71
534ae4398e2dcd769e07fa5678b39d862c2d2e2f
20497 F20110113_AACBTJ gutierrez_e_Page_069.QC.jpg
e91e89577a32680c6de8e23c569b77f0
016ac0247c8e0ac8bf2bb2b53baf56c5a309be59
2027 F20110113_AACBSV gutierrez_e_Page_017.txt
4865d6aa3f536c8df0fc6e36c7c7d321
e555c042a6ca4d9c841c2794e2152a9d275589ad
61656 F20110113_AACBTK gutierrez_e_Page_007.pro
2b69cf8f7585a8fc8e9153ee229fccd2
afcc07331d9044c7f9ba2e9a4f9f6d8f6ad17524
187661 F20110113_AACBSW gutierrez_e_Page_087.jpg
61aa3f23a7eab4236ccc704b59a17191
7050a7376dad4f612eeb3c4f969ab8edbac3c953
91979 F20110113_AACBTL gutierrez_e_Page_063.QC.jpg
9c2e5e3ddfecef9ea4d15117e7d15fb4
21e77af80d6e75b27f59ead54d690d3a703f0975
46072 F20110113_AACBSX gutierrez_e_Page_047thm.jpg
85d41f9073adc419b6f683bb0e13c34e
1910f87d5d5ded4b5d668cdda4afcbf5f93e259a
F20110113_AACBTM gutierrez_e_Page_053.tif
c0c56a8aaa349ecf6c5e91f8bc1f8f75
7fada6473af0507da46cbf4da5f2a5599c31bbc6
1972 F20110113_AACBSY gutierrez_e_Page_030.txt
923ec0187bfe47b061ac9eb8b8a27d77
f8ca60756e369fd40464b922c55fc03d21093909
246981 F20110113_AACBUA gutierrez_e_Page_097.jpg
ab75aaacaeff3873365356f3a96583ff
4ef8417e73f54d5b3ab767ad4b4272e4de8f8d80
1051952 F20110113_AACBTN gutierrez_e_Page_016.jp2
5b1cebd8afc3dd02592762b31c3a89af
6322701e96eb07a60deafb23086f321147099eb7
20113 F20110113_AACBSZ gutierrez_e_Page_033thm.jpg
167e728b5ad0208af2ffadc7a8eaad19
eab3dabf27ee577148bc7eec78f9a28561327d47
25760 F20110113_AACBUB gutierrez_e_Page_024thm.jpg
6a0b3e2917bd11f0c9aa34cf6818364a
443498011b1b569077ff3ef70a8cd732095b735a
44887 F20110113_AACBTO gutierrez_e_Page_088thm.jpg
929a439ecfeac8573bc6ebdbfaf74a4a
066cd1bea0501293fd7a0bd187799467acea1033
78413 F20110113_AACBUC gutierrez_e_Page_051.QC.jpg
eb59b47449d42e7605c65a951ee76a06
e97829d9f48b522ad894ee739a847c664e775d3e
1616 F20110113_AACBTP gutierrez_e_Page_002.pro
63e7f9463d0bd5b24ef3c217fe789ad1
cd4617cb84b32b2038dc76e6d90e5081a99a5546
25499 F20110113_AACBUD gutierrez_e_Page_017thm.jpg
65f4532c55bb8ee15152bcfd66c8007a
ee4f4c8d1d8ba2db75f1ba4f6fe1388264c63cd4
84873 F20110113_AACBTQ gutierrez_e_Page_089.QC.jpg
9d2fa1db141fe0272551c3494463e358
6d5409cebe09267c412d1b39e56ef08f68f0d207
214702 F20110113_AACBUE gutierrez_e_Page_013.jpg
683903e353ef2a817a0aaca4ef469020
6febf44c91942b9c92205163592ba44467d112de
211455 F20110113_AACBTR gutierrez_e_Page_015.jpg
6f971026e172c70d48a5ed8f6dc6cb38
564f294bf65b253b47dc3a4a8e3124c6a78189b1
2009 F20110113_AACCAA gutierrez_e_Page_096.txt
f4e3f534fa4c4339098388c7e5755683
a089ebda08dc1376c05f92597bf7524cec72686d
74496 F20110113_AACBUF gutierrez_e_Page_091.jpg
58961cb776c436a73e61648e944506e3
0b819b159369e1460fab411979aeb4ecb2836eeb
81994 F20110113_AACBTS gutierrez_e_Page_099.QC.jpg
46ee49e671858c31661bc1e94fe593ad
1d55c54b56ce133a295353a2566812f0821572cc
973 F20110113_AACCAB gutierrez_e_Page_071.txt
9def47fd3a3c0ce40756d0597a26cb07
7be498e25e55540b7c3e39cfd2f6b57045b1ff0f
19059 F20110113_AACBUG gutierrez_e_Page_006.pro
17652bf2413aa6be6cdfb50d5abed25f
59a29385a62aea00c06e1456374582f4305a4b77
160002 F20110113_AACBTT gutierrez_e_Page_053.jpg
fc4285a7f28a4a3f7815a851fcf5ea03
2223f60d9745720b206be5f273ae221e162926a0
23647 F20110113_AACCAC gutierrez_e_Page_021thm.jpg
d368ec9fd5b9751df587f1903c659bdb
49711432e4feee661bf79d57767dd4468e8f27b0
74833 F20110113_AACBUH gutierrez_e_Page_035.QC.jpg
cda9c82ecf17b07bef986375b878f89b
fe499672f73b3ffe8463dc8844c4f1f3dbdc6726
F20110113_AACBTU gutierrez_e_Page_088.tif
97cd22873560af767ddf0c2e64ebd0e3
864a3eae887bff27a15b5ef4586dd97ae6eb78be
23242 F20110113_AACCAD gutierrez_e_Page_065thm.jpg
336eb702633e8cdc633caab4c157385d
5ee0c568f5535e09127617c4145e07f5b103f5bd
109161 F20110113_AACBUI gutierrez_e_Page_013.jp2
4ed00d1cc3b159bdfbcbe0798a417b33
0e10bc217e2bfe1a25c2e89f9f70be32f1c89f02
50612 F20110113_AACBTV gutierrez_e_Page_020thm.jpg
affb30538c7a1116ea274fb24b021a1e
6314e6e2a4524951339057af7746744b67294ae6
1956 F20110113_AACCAE gutierrez_e_Page_067.txt
eea66022a0854397266d8c410774685e
c15c2df0c8987ab490462b69f52e976616e95613
59205 F20110113_AACBUJ gutierrez_e_Page_011.QC.jpg
2622c736f8087d026b43776f4e8ddf55
8b2d26a2461f98d0f02a393644db1891cc629e79
266195 F20110113_AACBTW gutierrez_e_Page_007.jpg
b5468414bc173cbb82cd5266f94d0bb7
b6e90dbdb2074f8c1cc00d8b8559e37c60782174
F20110113_AACCAF gutierrez_e_Page_021.tif
d971ba3319d48d3ff1dcf8a462af5dfd
78a43d52f9faf7ca89e3cc2d460b8daeb2720843
46347 F20110113_AACBUK gutierrez_e_Page_018thm.jpg
b7f5042c3fb69e1559e4f179681e4fbb
8346e4afbf25596e8f021663c227c7b983082de2
44044 F20110113_AACBTX gutierrez_e_Page_043.pro
62657f3e7924762c368ca373ec1dc92c
f51faf788ed000e4dfc31dc3b9c8026dc5121745
F20110113_AACCAG gutierrez_e_Page_030.tif
3f327ba3a6a11c656834b4866902e428
578b35e6439fc67631aa1cdecb883e94eecfb276
205067 F20110113_AACBUL gutierrez_e_Page_063.jpg
461bcdd7277855583b82521398d78a5a
164267682f7b49f795f6d718873a53c286156675
1705 F20110113_AACBTY gutierrez_e_Page_058.txt
699da988de75a8919141565b7f62f58c
498c2fea6c689334ff1eed13ad961f3b146b06ce
1898 F20110113_AACCAH gutierrez_e_Page_027.txt
ca5a78bde6024f7353f11577be9e1afe
4b7d4c45427d3244a1c239a97f0259f08d5af08d
106707 F20110113_AACBVA gutierrez_e_Page_016.QC.jpg
6bb5e0f188978c42b8938675a12b8c3b
b05513f779d03289c154628cada3638dcf64de39
1264 F20110113_AACBUM gutierrez_e_Page_047.txt
2210eb41e053969e587f9e39d0454814
e3ea71066e2d38f76416f49ad753552a1f903397
28450 F20110113_AACBTZ gutierrez_e_Page_058.pro
c9e81131cb730c5d33005d0cc417263b
4338d9da582c349e88df2de589b2829bac4635da
17171 F20110113_AACBVB gutierrez_e_Page_052thm.jpg
74d226226fe2e457d0a445a22702684b
9406f964f3b1aa5d86ffd029e97361b05b02af9c
35676 F20110113_AACBUN gutierrez_e_Page_009thm.jpg
d8136f975c7e7f195a2c231782b09c80
82e85fa582911bf31ba548dbe01d78758d4e27d7
188377 F20110113_AACCAI gutierrez_e_Page_065.jpg
28bd02dad6560f4e2f511c5edc729862
600f65534f9aefcd39d17b4019293c1c53f5f4f5
F20110113_AACBVC gutierrez_e_Page_020.jp2
add2ded868c6dd9967dbc9d6dbcdc5a2
4258d0282741a39998317f980dbbfcb2952a05fc
197198 F20110113_AACBUO gutierrez_e_Page_027.jpg
02c9a22841a3902d3fa61bd87be491eb
8f75838e3f04d2c7d965f154b18bfb1c57222b71
46104 F20110113_AACCAJ gutierrez_e_Page_041.pro
385b4d2f802ce384326f31a50692e06c
fc4ac9b3d06870d9e4b757f3c16195cbfea316b8
45128 F20110113_AACBVD gutierrez_e_Page_087thm.jpg
6c2c1a8dd3a7088db373f86522bab0c5
49a0a8797d460c9a97a2d94e40132e5fe6210e48
181513 F20110113_AACBUP gutierrez_e_Page_090.jpg
62ac96de2b7b055e956dcb561b856a35
549e4674af6865010d21d27ec86813a002287664
183889 F20110113_AACCAK gutierrez_e_Page_055.jpg
53997ca47547b4c046d09b7e7dcd77cc
2e3733289e74b03c3c6cdf727f12b7eeb3ad3e11
969 F20110113_AACBVE gutierrez_e_Page_075.txt
bbcae267690ed22712e7a8ff44d728cb
a7d4667ab327a813ec61907156c8230db77f73cd
49318 F20110113_AACBUQ gutierrez_e_Page_051.pro
17aa4a5dd906bc1edcdcf01100161534
1b1af699434dc10b483ad5af5c8f206e70e923b3
79063 F20110113_AACCAL gutierrez_e_Page_015.QC.jpg
448dbc8422c2a21788e24444aeaf9fce
f74df1001eb7de16f576de83aa7d06bf7e2a9d1a
1650 F20110113_AACBVF gutierrez_e_Page_026.txt
93464bd3c73fa95df39ec18813d01aea
e4c5473c77fbba7e472897c135f1186e0b7f1fbe
953542 F20110113_AACBUR gutierrez_e_Page_076.jp2
e12522853f225b5261f4a2ef203d1a81
9f0cb4f7fb75bb9aef83dcbb8599224a121f469c
86778 F20110113_AACCBA gutierrez_e_Page_087.QC.jpg
f1a8111c558a68ea67cdb85ede0d9d42
6f30da183b4a80034ee9fdec922eb617d374772d
95313 F20110113_AACCAM gutierrez_e_Page_055.jp2
2362ba87c7d34b96a13669497e282152
e82209eaed18b96994b4000abd58f260965aca6d
F20110113_AACBVG gutierrez_e_Page_046.tif
53c390e975968374620fe468f1c3c95a
ef1089b3e4e31175f31346e52642609ef1c59320
17232 F20110113_AACBUS gutierrez_e_Page_081.pro
4b804c991ca8c63cb3a8c914b7282baf
e7c38569177f927b5ec48ca9bbb5d8bed1606705
188089 F20110113_AACCBB gutierrez_e_Page_029.jpg
4b7f3a92835b3a2dd71b0b0caf4a0ac3
99de9a0a2ed6e2c0c62e418d34abcd93dbbe55bd
44854 F20110113_AACCAN gutierrez_e_Page_080thm.jpg
bd357cee05a447d248c76890fa8221c8
b3ad99967d6218a7434cb588cd6d96f4eea96d75
24104 F20110113_AACBVH gutierrez_e_Page_030thm.jpg
b99fde44adae6905636f4ffe4fb795b4
179e5fc4a8299d68054e5e65d61089c2721b5e63
1051928 F20110113_AACBUT gutierrez_e_Page_054.jp2
48a1da5925fac7881d1c03889e4107e6
f901a68b805f03fcef04bd9c866e3b8552d8a769
62980 F20110113_AACCBC gutierrez_e_Page_026.QC.jpg
1490c2318dd46035191efb60f0d99f19
e274fffc48de2bf883f85289ea44ef7f3a3df661
1125 F20110113_AACCAO gutierrez_e_Page_042.txt
1573e4d98021dbe8803b4f58fbc23a58
fe9075f556aa05aa903d3ecd338e05e7517ef2ab
2335 F20110113_AACBVI gutierrez_e_Page_099.txt
cdbaa69a03c7068c81e2f6b7f4d2d191
b08be1a98a7862b52655e7d149f31f24f7dccd18
1013719 F20110113_AACBUU gutierrez_e_Page_063.jp2
22aef1849fb982a3f14c1925d915bdf6
9ab55d0f3b5757bdf9b7a292e6551dd1da9bbfd2
18290 F20110113_AACCBD gutierrez_e_Page_071.pro
4c91b2b10f5229ffc1ae56d76d299d62
f605621f3a61de42bf9ae0457c6a4685096a743f
940 F20110113_AACCAP gutierrez_e_Page_073.txt
c3e8c636d10045502b7942084619e80d
3fede243024e1faaaa8d63bbe09f1a74ea7e4522
16808 F20110113_AACBVJ gutierrez_e_Page_079.pro
e891f49a430fc61b546f70f0b6c01a9d
c67bbceca4bcb1076894d123b6d5d61bdabd6b6d
34648 F20110113_AACBUV gutierrez_e_Page_100.pro
8ff741a78c85235579cec303587c9808
d073fcf8971367adfefc88d75ffc3714629e7fed
186049 F20110113_AACCBE gutierrez_e_Page_049.jpg
4cc5779c1d961fc88e380a6a9788adc8
4e4357d68f5f6f806c62681815af6e387876c9a3
F20110113_AACCAQ gutierrez_e_Page_024.tif
6aba3dabb6a78eda95a3cb7dbb7f411d
ee9b56b7fbf84d790691f9302ca6eb2c0c8b3731
84137 F20110113_AACBVK gutierrez_e_Page_071.QC.jpg
5b3b4d200ebabd71edaeba49d2f882b2
aede17b10389611bc13cc36c6e88489f28890047
951 F20110113_AACBUW gutierrez_e_Page_082.txt
c458fc1ab9fe519f4b74e950ff64c157
766f1e7ec8973c2418fe25b4a94841b28185454d
1047 F20110113_AACCBF gutierrez_e_Page_044.txt
ad2174e4b302e83f9766ea48417b41cc
21bdac6142a3840573ea073db2ef2e6c0a6de433
1009860 F20110113_AACCAR gutierrez_e_Page_083.jp2
20cb1898213f1bf71f53735f6922ab2f
78f90ca2936d39a0480946f096f57f865a0a5c8d
83790 F20110113_AACBVL gutierrez_e_Page_032.jp2
67156ba7895bc3256184df9606f5be70
f83cbbd644927bf5676d4751854c9f0ebc99186d
1339 F20110113_AACBUX gutierrez_e_Page_040.txt
837ccf53bbafd9220f520527950b70b6
0863e1344002afef43806ca19f15e53f8e3066b4
16889 F20110113_AACCBG gutierrez_e_Page_083.pro
574dbc82334518733387627873c75538
237ea905ea4a501a9eddb4ac99b36677b446a81d
44906 F20110113_AACBWA gutierrez_e_Page_075thm.jpg
9e3391fc4f5becca1478b50ac68fca04
5a24b1c45e37e6598c77a238520eb42aeddea9a0
44665 F20110113_AACCAS gutierrez_e_Page_072thm.jpg
4d1f32bfd3a3776fcd03611861b1c997
d1dcbd231458560e59edd132b8fd821743d02ba5
160301 F20110113_AACBVM gutierrez_e_Page_033.jpg
ed5d1a4792777c2e357d9162971d986c
89736048cf57d87c8a3cc1b90b4c3419dd6813b4
207585 F20110113_AACBUY gutierrez_e_Page_030.jpg
2c8537990f898e0c11c0dd0288708cc1
d9108c9f1be9ff60be0c689e4767f653fda93e05
31403 F20110113_AACCBH gutierrez_e_Page_095.jp2
c53044f8a482b8042691b0ca676d958d
9a5095dff828ce55c4dfecc16ba6b2fd3f9cd66f
45291 F20110113_AACBWB gutierrez_e_Page_060thm.jpg
394c4cfd3e885455a2769259e2be849b
cf678e4dfac1f9301fe26fc32e70557fcc47482c
984719 F20110113_AACCAT gutierrez_e_Page_047.jp2
a480555c3d3341163040a4ac356c1fb8
05236522a18ab83230af5541b40c8deed69b180c
F20110113_AACBVN gutierrez_e_Page_081.tif
6990896216efde0a1b24515d9721ff74
6d071ce6e1a63f9a5bfcb30f1a5305b432549a59
91229 F20110113_AACBUZ gutierrez_e_Page_023.QC.jpg
5f8fa9c1d86c22cfaacea0ba462b4955
225efbe978532730a014aba481883d5bb818b152
9826 F20110113_AACCBI gutierrez_e_Page_095thm.jpg
72c4cbadc8d3cac391d4f40462678393
1614c316dcd2b3810725fbb0524de4ffb3334448
181388 F20110113_AACBWC gutierrez_e_Page_089.jpg
6f4366160c686c7432b564e8b21eaf51
e39515b3ee25ca6f9ffbc419ae159d2a6df8a789
192271 F20110113_AACCAU gutierrez_e_Page_061.jpg
1aeb4b9b4a5c3d224e937e19aed954cf
15cc1a886123bcfd73a50cdbc071dead6e85349f
195846 F20110113_AACBVO gutierrez_e_Page_041.jpg
23a2eee9465508694e73a20b5098b4be
0c4b2e62be747fb321cf789aca7e60b311e3c00b
F20110113_AACBWD gutierrez_e_Page_038.tif
6b9c133247b8ea776d3080bf35924387
74232b095d3abf0ed5cf1c0a81f1821bc2a009e7
244607 F20110113_AACCAV gutierrez_e_Page_020.jpg
f343ccb435f508705d00895ae451e75d
1559fe8b8b477a4f371384afafadd752302e7ce4
26996 F20110113_AACBVP gutierrez_e_Page_042.pro
05b5c3d4d031c6dfae2a6bac13292943
90c6a27071afffaf2b801ee6e7131cf2bae8423f
1730 F20110113_AACCBJ gutierrez_e_Page_012.txt
eb988b0d2e2823d367c65315d61a3b1a
8cf10923482f7d5c5754d8853e8738ce7bfa6c09
85696 F20110113_AACBWE gutierrez_e_Page_085.QC.jpg
3e8e381a55f49e6f35522568a6626ad7
de509c42cf18d9512ff2d2639587b719dc6864de
20318 F20110113_AACCAW gutierrez_e_Page_010thm.jpg
93e1643fdfbe54cea67b12e0111e2d89
48862acc9e7385402cb3d3193e98a32779e10f65
95583 F20110113_AACBVQ gutierrez_e_Page_050.QC.jpg
c9f8038e34a9e98185285120fafb7669
670aabd9274811640abfac65c6304bfec64797d2
84379 F20110113_AACCBK gutierrez_e_Page_073.QC.jpg
8a2d06bb3169b809bcdd3426d7a89228
e914923d51f36775ec9e4dbf35415216af80a20f
85041 F20110113_AACBWF gutierrez_e_Page_090.QC.jpg
50a7665f854b66cfe891339a6498be87
992a50fa093896d38464e5485ea0d348dac39256
8171 F20110113_AACCAX gutierrez_e_Page_064.pro
5810757b341e97098d5e8419ad529f9e
5e781fb080f2f0a621ac37d52ac59c74871e2988
51151 F20110113_AACBVR gutierrez_e_Page_016.pro
10e5eff2fb42617669de3046570c96dc
7a6b5432f7866c4706bd0241f5ed86cf34f63d7e
228048 F20110113_AACCCA gutierrez_e_Page_099.jpg
caf4ff4b117385c74418bbfed722040c
bf874410330412ab87f65bdb4a41b882a6fd5849
10342 F20110113_AACCBL gutierrez_e_Page_069.pro
f7f83bb42e81ed3af6bb8c9d245c4223
30959aac2fe71d8be9eb1b6908c411cbe8445d2c
21195 F20110113_AACBWG gutierrez_e_Page_005.pro
53045b6bbe631ec75435a9e145979b39
6bd79137ed19b903afdb5ce0d1655c05c670549f
18129 F20110113_AACCAY gutierrez_e_Page_044.pro
eb9c3e97ac8eae1da454f069ecf8a95b
c347c8ecf65b462feb0f64015c5c9397d4f080ea
83843 F20110113_AACBVS gutierrez_e_Page_079.QC.jpg
6418cb870bf02eaffeaaaacec5729581
ec255ccf22fbac15c471f823260e43c680a80c62
55819 F20110113_AACCCB gutierrez_e_Page_097.pro
d2255c1004538145aed42acbdd11de9d
7da8efcbd24bea4b1c69b8cd9f1e602218118593
1051954 F20110113_AACCBM gutierrez_e_Page_050.jp2
e9a04a72be45fadc9f612211c7145a84
e986ea52d8a5685c08f4d3a90919b2edaabaf692
46495 F20110113_AACBWH gutierrez_e_Page_027.pro
8a57d1bbcbc5b684b1ddd1c86008caf9
0f28139df87dcebc95c18d29008cece108fca1d3
37561 F20110113_AACCAZ gutierrez_e_Page_063.pro
6e7c8aee9e60f3af425e66d7ae7bef09
b2b070b0019ce22500ab03088774cc67a7497b8f
48916 F20110113_AACBVT gutierrez_e_Page_030.pro
d9829c9fe9d72740d222ef5c61a16740
c83ec98fe1d9d0f0a2bd09f527322ae8a7f6e9ab
109102 F20110113_AACCCC gutierrez_e_Page_020.QC.jpg
2901a53ea2b76a01b8c546646a2a148c
675a79b64794b5fbebf5d9f7ee236ffd49f68edd
F20110113_AACCBN gutierrez_e_Page_086.tif
36fe43dc72a1182c358fbb42526e722f
2920a1c3e43a2bea93407ef1c86624122a330c8a
998316 F20110113_AACBWI gutierrez_e_Page_090.jp2
5c3a20a9982bd8d6fbba503f82a961bf
2541b6c2ed2815a10f85cf8279249c860844db12
46052 F20110113_AACBVU gutierrez_e_Page_036.pro
d317d5d3478bdf050a5f51789cd7e7cc
cb02f7c63b8a39c84b5d558f328c5df4f5084767
926 F20110113_AACCCD gutierrez_e_Page_088.txt
c6c0df349db5c5a4fa1bb13f04789486
7530a041177241e0271a12ccab47aa5428030e81
26025 F20110113_AACCBO gutierrez_e_Page_067thm.jpg
3f00ec6474e12e105aacaf5d1ea67afa
b9ac68998279d3fc35ff775d1a17c45705f35529
F20110113_AACBWJ gutierrez_e_Page_011.tif
10cc0d4c383869e295e68606545b3245
f7b7d6cff0d6a7c5fef979ee92d85d9817f23e39
44608 F20110113_AACBVV gutierrez_e_Page_071thm.jpg
7143c18aed5b12d4b81eaeac1cc8573d
f595e3d4248a05182116884f5b26fa0c085bbb5c
1022009 F20110113_AACCCE gutierrez_e_Page_085.jp2
13b3603aa4c5367ba99934468f930f43
493c2e4b2a780e14cada5b1696a091b4f1e6cfd7
1019470 F20110113_AACCBP gutierrez_e_Page_080.jp2
e9f8dd219e4cfddcf784e8a2afbd0cb7
af73cb9d0bdd337b123661d955b52197ebc17d79
78542 F20110113_AACBWK gutierrez_e_Page_022.QC.jpg
0efea1c3974df400489c4c2d2cf1f3cf
b50df46bfee4001e64e499ada57265619bc3c327
46062 F20110113_AACBVW gutierrez_e_Page_045.pro
89b43dbd1c1e24e46273214ac26ada2f
9137c5822ab10b2b9ae0c4d3295a6f9080bcafcd
17983 F20110113_AACCCF gutierrez_e_Page_074.pro
9b9dc3dae8b61557ab7ab81d04271d75
7781f27449f871d59a114007b05b0823d77d2b92
1004240 F20110113_AACCBQ gutierrez_e_Page_089.jp2
c43b63496f88df69624f78b9d1b5d3e9
0a8f48224b7a72d36bb7290b29f2390e163fd768
F20110113_AACBWL gutierrez_e_Page_068.tif
41fcb33bfd6fedb3606c7300e851381d
61be7b28e5a178f5fd1b03cf6b08795b34e7c3cf
19234 F20110113_AACBVX gutierrez_e_Page_100thm.jpg
70963c4de851f6b5ce66234aa9154621
8088968581d64905218284266ec28fe86dd417e5
2032 F20110113_AACCCG gutierrez_e_Page_021.txt
7b0e39067557dd0a24085a8b6c593005
94919d8f34b1e959f2099c1a8aff8239657c0b35
27504 F20110113_AACCBR gutierrez_e_Page_091.QC.jpg
ef70d700013426e5cdb92a17ed4bd11f
8d9a3a2831031d8b87b019888b201870b676907a
44796 F20110113_AACBWM gutierrez_e_Page_085thm.jpg
1e3fc903625dbc9a4c8691577b6210c0
b917492bcfedac2ec13e475661a1f1ef7eb30468
F20110113_AACBVY gutierrez_e_Page_044.tif
74fd0a1ab57759e7a6b3a88fa965c74a
d0e4be2d20b0407d87b419fd01799d03ba3c3623
73623 F20110113_AACCCH gutierrez_e_Page_028.QC.jpg
766d33f232c43fd8922e7517142b4878
40afc44f792805764ad31ba5182cdeb5fc82cdd2
78077 F20110113_AACBXA gutierrez_e_Page_039.QC.jpg
31655fb6ed086a4508a97eda8dbe83fb
fd92c59c7dc9541d312bf6690605951b0c691229
1491 F20110113_AACCBS gutierrez_e_Page_046.txt
789f59d6372a4e1a757e09edf5d3f937
f01b5465bfde8879653a379dcda348a2bfcff315
812 F20110113_AACBWN gutierrez_e_Page_006.txt
868450855f4230ef46f08605a757f2a3
67c8236316446554d89ac78de9aef9bd76f85ac3
971426 F20110113_AACBVZ gutierrez_e_Page_081.jp2
d59bfdab16ad66dcc21ed51638f2c711
b4412afa8e357a5cc2b1bcfb33f7cde640823d2e
19096 F20110113_AACCCI gutierrez_e_Page_053thm.jpg
2808b24d528c40f6ac041cf556467cd1
f25ef2d5dead77ebba12134b7f78320a40eec479
81565 F20110113_AACBXB gutierrez_e_Page_066.QC.jpg
f758d2978fc6bdfd93b7b3f21d2f8d53
6501798e328391c2936b9931a74f66dfb2eaadd5
182347 F20110113_AACCBT gutierrez_e_Page_083.jpg
2ae1d0b5fff9d13e189394eb6eeae60b
55471ddb1952ca57bdad0a8e43077ec52132d0a7
F20110113_AACBWO gutierrez_e_Page_074.tif
c7a47c319824591ade6440bbdd1f85d0
51f4b609e117e9d574abd28a224808fb2b77616f
715324 F20110113_AACCCJ gutierrez_e_Page_009.jp2
84394f3608a0621b85d63e83277cd219
dba607689a72edc239a67c2aeabe1397a3727d71
F20110113_AACBXC gutierrez_e_Page_028.tif
3cd7ae38b7e2cb2d51d0a1138dbd78a3
a6be0450dc190019ba68c183554a1563e3c75120
815425 F20110113_AACCBU gutierrez_e_Page_039.jp2
c6ab8488e8e85cf1d89fea3d2d98cf9d
ab833973b02c964979d6fff9cd5b75d42ed2c997
207431 F20110113_AACBWP gutierrez_e_Page_023.jpg
5a6ea2d42ccfd43147206f3816852ee0
c432ec61390842ef6826c4be26f81ffd829020f3
211744 F20110113_AACBXD gutierrez_e_Page_062.jpg
37f9bc7b2505b54d31fb4cf7416f3ab2
3e15ae3a8b1dc3cef6e8a67471296311c6cb8f95
1035280 F20110113_AACCBV gutierrez_e_Page_037.jp2
c4e01ee4fcd948cf5b730091ec3f3de0
810396389d82ef862901e3d07a3cd96cfa525d96
23112 F20110113_AACBWQ gutierrez_e_Page_061.pro
7777b5df3fa436dd59c01c1dd8446c29
df2575209caf07712b15f2c27f19f6b413229cef
7047 F20110113_AACCCK gutierrez_e_Page_069thm.jpg
dd491865dffb087779cba87d5fa1c379
1546d111974eaed1de77948fc113fb6ed56040e7
F20110113_AACBXE gutierrez_e_Page_055.tif
956181fbd93506bcc74633e8183d18b9
8673dbed35fa57c859b1ccd45e1d1df5a5ec9b45
972 F20110113_AACCBW gutierrez_e_Page_077.txt
17051c896c48f304e2e235b6a962d1ec
548d8a9949170b142270dc6b7ce0347f5c87c31f
26933 F20110113_AACBWR gutierrez_e_Page_028.pro
9e854d8077778d29525e2afbb5840264
893f77c57c82518bd8448f73ee6d7d089077c034
197302 F20110113_AACCDA gutierrez_e_Page_021.jpg
5f216b734f0c740474a6f993abb9563a
d3ddd9b74a29c9db1088fe6b0f9ff2c948ace06c
44784 F20110113_AACCCL gutierrez_e_Page_078thm.jpg
f01617a00ca1e69a88ab7cd388872576
27083fd39193fed84132f9de8bcbb678ddc7db6f
1060 F20110113_AACBXF gutierrez_e_Page_074.txt
b5cd900dec768236c14b9c9dbd8277c0
27c5e60c14f8839d205122690beca9b383026ce2
F20110113_AACCBX gutierrez_e_Page_093.tif
e2d5957506673d58ed9b45326a14e622
579a4689ccc23b25660ec91108225057ca4eb406
110426 F20110113_AACBWS gutierrez_e_Page_017.jp2
c9b3fa31f28158b50502ae5dbb3b393b
f2251232130b6cd0dbecc48612df38a9bedf540f
209642 F20110113_AACCDB gutierrez_e_Page_060.jpg
cf0e4ee9ccdc4833981243d84214dde8
80a13bc9600373806db806305ae1b65701f0f874
F20110113_AACCCM gutierrez_e_Page_084.tif
f26e6b69457a43ec1700ad623c9273cb
54e1201e1603cb7c22b35fb8dc8bfa6f82f4b527
14748 F20110113_AACBXG gutierrez_e_Page_002.jpg
cf264e16fd22dd6b1298840158e1cd53
4364535a67662d9c8f9ad1ac2d57d893327df1b0
1015375 F20110113_AACCBY gutierrez_e_Page_088.jp2
08d1b36e2ef5808131d3617fdcd5425c
ea5241e727ff2ec01bdcb7ebbe96f1b4b69e3d03
215908 F20110113_AACBWT gutierrez_e_Page_068.jpg
a8a5021019439c9dbc7423394007b8c4
43f491d5014151dfde2dfd3ca4bcf32a508e5b67
F20110113_AACCDC gutierrez_e_Page_075.tif
95ce2e4b760021b029cd061c908004d8
2230d235c6c6026be8bc45d43891fdc8ca4a0a3a
43457 F20110113_AACCCN gutierrez_e_Page_065.pro
c4ca378d27a2844edecc84042786595d
d345846c57482c78c690f7cd2ebfb52b54beacf5
F20110113_AACBXH gutierrez_e_Page_002.tif
bf017a378278571dfccff322f424fe09
3a372ff8845dc5c50f3345ff5121872ce94bd7f3
82539 F20110113_AACCBZ gutierrez_e_Page_067.QC.jpg
58200e13968b7a00ad5f172d5e0a73a8
4289b19d252ba3177d3dc360ab6b4b1b9b3093af
86244 F20110113_AACBWU gutierrez_e_Page_057.QC.jpg
d2e2c823381f27dc62f764d8513fccca
897c8bd04fd0d796fa4704a06f0e64ec7e3ab779
216126 F20110113_AACCDD gutierrez_e_Page_017.jpg
580a2574b4d492ae34b348090825927b
2a5d69269093a9fa1674e717290e30f3f5e7b9bc
219807 F20110113_AACCCO gutierrez_e_Page_057.jpg
81b8093f503b41493804d2cd5c238f63
7a6d48510093832270be9e640995f39d38b50225
940963 F20110113_AACBXI gutierrez_e_Page_042.jp2
506503c90b511f600198259cf9886cdf
07be82fe55ed9ba1d63ab527788a75d340918fa8
70448 F20110113_AACBWV gutierrez_e_Page_065.QC.jpg
40adf0e4efe53e81a504eda137cc38f8
cc424303b97e8af5ab5e4b29cc210d02afd15f55
213955 F20110113_AACCDE gutierrez_e_Page_058.jpg
c6ec4d8f59a897107cfb6356895ec3be
db2d1acd5cd55b0a7b1e1e6150d37d38f724a00e
158956 F20110113_AACCCP gutierrez_e_Page_011.jpg
adee3337d46d08719e408cf15d804ca0
749a03bc010771de5406a350c226b135a788e2c5
20071 F20110113_AACBXJ gutierrez_e_Page_095.pro
d75bd550bb605b23751e02dcca3c2f4c
6f52f9afbf0ff37f5979ea24628d1233ddf1dd9c
159691 F20110113_AACBWW gutierrez_e_Page_028.jpg
f33faf7bd06b957a73e09cc7cbe50f4e
f33709dd4c95253afbee7b4c13ca971c0aa94558
82739 F20110113_AACCDF gutierrez_e_Page_095.jpg
a85937f24a06fe57f19bc247a8b1ebc8
d753cc582ecb3c3f3476a0b94ab51f73d3a14a6d
54451 F20110113_AACCCQ gutierrez_e_Page_009.QC.jpg
816b30c4e8c32a722811877b72ac4630
7f291abdf83b6ff813365554b61cf7fe120bc55e
F20110113_AACBXK gutierrez_e_Page_014.tif
c5a3f21a416de47bcb715748ec0bc7e8
ee95c081e80d1368c8ce2d51a44248dafa9859f4
49072 F20110113_AACBWX gutierrez_e_Page_059.pro
e91e8582e83128754038d293b2f776cf
ee362a0ea22cbca0037dedc2d901e0aca9f3fdbb
50294 F20110113_AACCDG gutierrez_e_Page_050thm.jpg
a45a364bb22d9cdffc44beb1796fef51
5ad291881da69bf0701c9d67075b9d0e97949f1a
1051975 F20110113_AACBYA gutierrez_e_Page_018.jp2
267cd277fcc75bd5d9a2fb6043fe4764
431533a8a922e954c6a361b4b4f466a1898a617a
50071 F20110113_AACCCR gutierrez_e_Page_016thm.jpg
32379153e40afa14f3c7b43239ee4b3f
26cb49bcce67a78ea32655cbb6a727b65ff6413c
105055 F20110113_AACBXL gutierrez_e_Page_064.jpg
05698a598026a77d9a5d96781421da3c
06d0f7a2cb1cca1f046d65e2b8e70440f58a34a3
F20110113_AACCDH gutierrez_e_Page_006.tif
3b75c9430dfa4f71116a26cfabfa5dc6
24a1677996d163604ef3b585fa3dca4b1c36d88c
23756 F20110113_AACCCS gutierrez_e_Page_027thm.jpg
7d9bd91b923adb58695700eff5092d0d
46f6d1738eefee2b7c63304c070b04eb615a8254
25195 F20110113_AACBXM gutierrez_e_Page_036thm.jpg
4bd3307bcd8529431ae74823855ec67e
4f1ad66a92f5185372cb2ec5be672521d887737a
2014 F20110113_AACBWY gutierrez_e_Page_016.txt
6ad21e81fc4fbe26995591b50ba78e28
1faa9fb3cf97406c548518f50e6e616862a86c52
86963 F20110113_AACCDI gutierrez_e_Page_034.QC.jpg
cc80b1c97b34667889cbefe46d847779
362d2f1ff5aa8d0f97a924297da2c0cf07ff9ed0
28548 F20110113_AACBYB gutierrez_e_Page_060.pro
185c0c2b1f114e864c498becf5a7a91b
ab7cb382d4305b90f5b37ec735fe5c1b5c12fa71
32787 F20110113_AACCCT gutierrez_e_Page_092.jp2
8ecef5a22092148e1c1aa7fc48c80081
0e1b49e6ce81930bc270070cf71ec326424d5028
111797 F20110113_AACBXN gutierrez_e_Page_014.jp2
f72f01a9f996fa56376b9996aecb82b5
f5cd9f6a5f25027a53cda276cb9ba0522e0ec190
F20110113_AACBWZ gutierrez_e_Page_090.tif
271a7e63d0a9db59611a962342706c16
8e231359480b3d6becaeed60d748e835809a2d32
F20110113_AACCDJ gutierrez_e_Page_057.tif
f07b49d2152c60af571274fba8fbeb80
43f9e4d076c9f1f6f5e4bd133aedbb2588b47488
50924 F20110113_AACBYC gutierrez_e_Page_044thm.jpg
1f69548b080f7ea125745aa3b534b482
cba722f7413a4740398f3e3cc3556595f4817361
F20110113_AACCCU gutierrez_e_Page_019.tif
533003adba60507ba714fa70c3785769
3114c12e4ea8496711662f08b03004919c78d4de
1763 F20110113_AACBXO gutierrez_e_Page_038.txt
3f9cc6f338ce0e7bb70c205850de70df
a597e2f662b94ecea81929dfc681cd65610ab734
29592 F20110113_AACCDK gutierrez_e_Page_094.QC.jpg
ebe252d24e2a8314f7c9199ef1325d40
1426351925494e555f1b6dc3cac1466c82452882
F20110113_AACBYD gutierrez_e_Page_045.tif
ed1d6b26652454a4504046c9aee02f6b
c567aa0b3a38187912bb222a9f7dda312ea74984
F20110113_AACCCV gutierrez_e_Page_089.tif
d60568e0279505ff9820ae255a00ad32
5a297aab2348fbc4e96f81db31268a1ee964025b
117598 F20110113_AACBXP gutierrez_e_Page_099.jp2
a62022adedea8f1f71ae07c5d21704b3
ccfaa993a562d663a485e2effb1e970fbb2b3e0b
2060 F20110113_AACBYE gutierrez_e_Page_014.txt
81a72b0583ce0fb8601d0a4ce86ae3fd
327beb96e5fb862c4e035f8c5298ebe04829194e
83626 F20110113_AACCCW gutierrez_e_Page_046.QC.jpg
a1906cd877f904eb5c36a6ec681a1f9b
a95d088d8b4ec8a8a7d7a73f4f382f4204b0b822
F20110113_AACBXQ gutierrez_e_Page_008.tif
b6c8b305c75c9c245c368fb6f4a58d86
43c0a14c7f4d36aa88bd3bee331c2c5b7826396c
41720 F20110113_AACCDL gutierrez_e_Page_037thm.jpg
5001388b137f1029e8887cf7824e02f1
f617f07abfd0cf8049bbeca8e5d5f706b6a866cf
974 F20110113_AACBYF gutierrez_e_Page_090.txt
372656fcf6959f8dcc0dc1f92d4e86b3
c2522a60db6c7dd9bfc15aac6521839c9780d5de
6123 F20110113_AACCCX gutierrez_e_Page_001thm.jpg
73e567c0d2da7f536e8e771e6b6a474c
5184fb7bf0a023976f6d54a569c4f3d63e8e31af
52060 F20110113_AACBXR gutierrez_e_Page_022.pro
f1fcb156364379b973708c252c69251b
767962c6cae664bb5ef22afddb86cd6c1156750f
234646 F20110113_AACCEA gutierrez_e_Page_044.jpg
bf6f6a0dd19af8dab449f1710f87a8b3
849d14da3317f6b515efdaf619515b3b516da08f
84702 F20110113_AACCDM gutierrez_e_Page_078.QC.jpg
9a62c3e1d7d3e542684380f1751b8c59
b951ab7fcced78bb88809f79a2b9676d00775a94
51564 F20110113_AACBYG gutierrez_e_Page_020.pro
76ed694a4be36d86f6bd56656d2e573c
626717d084d1c0c64445f286d32bd3f3bae26fc7
15500 F20110113_AACCCY gutierrez_e_Page_091.pro
934749914428511980bd8d0529ac00bf
ac8214036a8102202f9d709b3a2ac2704c9567d9
49239 F20110113_AACBXS gutierrez_e_Page_019.pro
5043bf213a7d28588c4c93509a9a0a50
797c71e261446d8f89133b6729d80ddfd9dbc3a0
1051968 F20110113_AACCEB gutierrez_e_Page_004.jp2
3acc45c4c9dc08bf659cf6159c6e38b6
6578ef160934610bb24cd897f1d94f3c8577ab64
1426 F20110113_AACCDN gutierrez_e_Page_100.txt
d45eaac52d6f7ff4a45d378b4aa93de6
3c68ec7b7a77ce8c728304ebded5cccba2f58934
118919 F20110113_AACBYH gutierrez_e_Page_098.jp2
10573abdea911c106d12dce949273efe
f2d7282b3f495a303859ff95b9793449c7bb9e2b
206262 F20110113_AACCCZ gutierrez_e_Page_047.jpg
f085ce05c01bb0b8a0f3bfb4a5a68ca5
d1d42f7b12ff3629086d991eefad811b9123ade1
F20110113_AACBXT gutierrez_e_Page_062.tif
49d06d3cccaaa1acd21f0347d4de77e7
69124749e7ab17e75ed02113dea11ba68e1db3f9
104357 F20110113_AACCEC gutierrez_e_Page_059.jp2
b75949c14f0a1c382c5ccf6898a52d92
408143a9f594081acb52bc6407dc764659b60cf5
1794 F20110113_AACCDO gutierrez_e_Page_010.txt
203f0b31c7edc6cb4ff26ebbb19fde37
4a885bc399158395a0e98bc60c51c7f8a45890a0
25382 F20110113_AACBYI gutierrez_e_Page_099thm.jpg
31193b83ab98de716322deac3674e422
dd1aa6b7cb70ddfb6470d191a50cc47ea8321a6e
178052 F20110113_AACBXU gutierrez_e_Page_012.jpg
b3feabf3c5840cc362d89a2eab2a4216
ed9b2332d0c5d35adeb407e8cd4ff3229d639fae
1826 F20110113_AACCED gutierrez_e_Page_035.txt
51c6305da22b920f57448f25abd06ecb
90f5fa5447d6833d0d7fb69e09b01dc033c7fcfb
28952 F20110113_AACCDP gutierrez_e_Page_046.pro
85db02df43da7c86ee6b8672fd64b5bf
79036695c4e513f871b9769cfa204402bf877e03
F20110113_AACBYJ gutierrez_e_Page_003.tif
22e0ebd45c86fa2937917359218859d2
e6bfc60b48d4e6765b3610921aba209e6831c13d
F20110113_AACBXV gutierrez_e_Page_018.tif
1cab0c563a006193f12645ab552d93c7
ad121495335074042ae7a05efdd4bf08b93cc209
993520 F20110113_AACCEE gutierrez_e_Page_070.jp2
a367de5c66bd15d2d6e1617fc18ff598
7ff19be977bdc0dbca0438f5c727c099e5ba155d
75730 F20110113_AACCDQ gutierrez_e_Page_030.QC.jpg
b8e00a84c3aa5d816933bcd77c6f8d0f
d325f2103703bd91c37392034abf69b664f2e4f9
96940 F20110113_AACBYK gutierrez_e_Page_018.QC.jpg
e4a594bf6eddeca9090057fb8775051b
aff9e48819a86a74a1cf866da45906df38813995
F20110113_AACBXW gutierrez_e_Page_082thm.jpg
828c923189c02dfdf881f993594c6fe8
5105daa791ad3972f78cb8710982e1ec901fdfc1
117831 F20110113_AACCEF UFE0004905_00001.mets FULL
127be8ad1f8ccedd6982682b6e38abd7
bd8b484a8ce7def2571ebd2aeeda58f63ada19f6
2039 F20110113_AACCDR gutierrez_e_Page_020.txt
0ef1ee6d6b69fdecc528fcb4e08d9ebe
8c5c9c3cc895bd685484c5da6f7ac4ded6f7a23a
84920 F20110113_AACBYL gutierrez_e_Page_014.QC.jpg
ab1f6c58cf15f08754768a88ceaf9a5d
ff05a716ada7bdb68f3158b08c84d68dc745c726
2294 F20110113_AACBXX gutierrez_e_Page_097.txt
64e8d5bed6c891b38be8a7d4147f857a
208a9e1b80b8822a4a467600f6b71554de11b200
21920 F20110113_AACBZA gutierrez_e_Page_055thm.jpg
9ba8dd393a66d059884bda1cdd886306
be3ddeb69261dc9d98f328ba093d507bdea95259
105719 F20110113_AACCDS gutierrez_e_Page_015.jp2
38fb436c486fe2f943d828b2c6b8b35b
5b0c545457d5eb07c08f3e438cf689cbf7ce2c0e
84746 F20110113_AACBYM gutierrez_e_Page_072.QC.jpg
3032448b5bdd81700cd3db607bd0f3c2
5a678c232ac2311daed711700a73b25cd10c5037
41156 F20110113_AACBXY gutierrez_e_Page_012.pro
a352e6f3961c484c6806cd7b97fe3f81
1a829f8e63b709fccab81238bff78339d12674bf
F20110113_AACBZB gutierrez_e_Page_047.tif
c0318fd15b09f54492ad5e02dfbe45f2
a04e38c95395e70284b5cbd5c8b8c06f50f24942
1051980 F20110113_AACCDT gutierrez_e_Page_008.jp2
65f5b17e3f7f1a965db22be7cc664150
0ec2346ee8aab329f7b9e7e985855a69f6132d84
29339 F20110113_AACBYN gutierrez_e_Page_095.QC.jpg
010466fb41445bdcb18aa5811d8a114e
84509f9d542d0ec6adeb09ba296f3f87f41d204b
2000 F20110113_AACBXZ gutierrez_e_Page_066.txt
3a35bcd2d35a18c84b9ee079bfdab619
490612c79720af01f486104cdc06dafaa4da68bc
48099 F20110113_AACCEI gutierrez_e_Page_001.jpg
468600b101b728f89a0b66b6385e132f
a0bf4cbffdb071b5d5f395c777c7e5ae84c3cb03
41695 F20110113_AACCDU gutierrez_e_Page_054.pro
596b195bec069e56a606f1b20eaa2360
ed4b7b964ba1ba625f741e75b9167a411a29b358
158863 F20110113_AACBYO gutierrez_e_Page_031.jpg
3ba80dc3671b1c2f8855911784c25a15
8718a317d375cf705d329a11c90336076339cf2e
131315 F20110113_AACCEJ gutierrez_e_Page_003.jpg
cdc891c1106f33ed4bc3ae57e987043d
2e1cc050aa2fe6fa9eac5dc11aa85dfb2a25c3ee
19061 F20110113_AACBZC gutierrez_e_Page_031thm.jpg
0fb714810b0786ef5315108fda31770a
c70b61750358d11c3b37c095824e43d878ba46a6
71739 F20110113_AACBYP gutierrez_e_Page_052.jp2
aa30cdadceba01dc400fb02d75f7afb6
c74b3cebe660422fb78cc71abfd640fdc4d1ebcd
257428 F20110113_AACCEK gutierrez_e_Page_004.jpg
5b5dd9a189c8beb7cbf90e2b6068a67f
76e1504e0a4c82a68333ac86ba88fd3dba0f6474
F20110113_AACBZD gutierrez_e_Page_027.tif
43f45d2b3689cf5b84be9256c72ac77a
47100d56136ae9b4fe37b0b5bc53ef713d223b77
139570 F20110113_AACCDV gutierrez_e_Page_008.QC.jpg
fdbcbeded3a1155b823cf9cf536566a0
ef4958aef775fa4217ea941456248edfbb65bc77
16215 F20110113_AACBYQ gutierrez_e_Page_001.QC.jpg
782cb409dbd55c02c3c30e4f466fb7b7
d647bb2fc3f1b783527ca620f4c4652b34fafb1d
110824 F20110113_AACCEL gutierrez_e_Page_009.jpg
79008b7d1176059c5cd1e06831ebdd0a
a227d55f63b1381c4d1d55de7027b01d2af64a53
86457 F20110113_AACBZE gutierrez_e_Page_026.jp2
53811ba04381f4369fcb2c99993be88b
129561c6db425f1e0b08ad688edfc5a0da04490d
1023 F20110113_AACCDW gutierrez_e_Page_076.txt
23b7df538f39e18e17f548fff6ea8117
117abed98a9d82d2468e0f3529f68f1ba453377d
84755 F20110113_AACBYR gutierrez_e_Page_033.jp2
e9697628c1e9e7084b882275b9715ef0
df90f34639ecb18c097359517a96778a806b186f
184603 F20110113_AACCFA gutierrez_e_Page_082.jpg
f629a76f8c2f7d2c5978bd8b4d22ce24
ee375cf8a37ae7be85b5918194a70c7dd2275a9a
365040 F20110113_AACBZF gutierrez_e_Page_008.jpg
3fc1c5c837ceb2bf3ba316f5200ee093
26d21904f580645fa22b2714e177503ae7d174d0
51545 F20110113_AACCDX gutierrez_e_Page_017.pro
f54a0e8bc4fdca4cb593124d31b18ad6
ddf0ef12b2113206157917700609a287377f921b
102881 F20110113_AACBYS gutierrez_e_Page_096.jp2
e00ffe412eabcc8d69e662efd1ca8666
d8dd93fd8ddfee37632b21cd9a5d4fc57a12acf2
179633 F20110113_AACCFB gutierrez_e_Page_084.jpg
072d435e5f6613c6b283f33dfd4cf66f
20f86f07dfb5c0094f145ff4bfc12672416661b2
243194 F20110113_AACCEM gutierrez_e_Page_016.jpg
f90bab347ac1dd558046837968e80ce1
d45895b9a5500a3c510cf76fa748b0a12ca11881
95701 F20110113_AACBZG gutierrez_e_Page_065.jp2
6c5c3a9b1a1b26e92fe6dcfc28c28722
6088dc9f7d5760fab59b1463bb5296ceeda1e757
F20110113_AACCDY gutierrez_e_Page_065.tif
bad0c5046e6811e30c7b5a788d29c00d
95e98040af8bbd75c7b9d924eadb06341e24c4fd
1998 F20110113_AACBYT gutierrez_e_Page_013.txt
b3ed57da86d0b50a6f03aeb420af2b82
3dd4bad62a91c41b92010fb9b8284de11f1f7604
184602 F20110113_AACCFC gutierrez_e_Page_085.jpg
4929f3211eee5d93b2d8026ad5ce612c
5e5aecaf6e4b7439575550c03af2651c6e945130
214839 F20110113_AACCEN gutierrez_e_Page_019.jpg
8cf5c4cc80395f63806d80252c75db4a
121d43b604b037e2c51abde5b9c76bba3dde6fd7
99798 F20110113_AACBZH gutierrez_e_Page_041.jp2
066f074a9b0a364f6f1f10635898d935
eab70e41c7eb18bca9fa4d1fb89833cbfeb6f96e
1387 F20110113_AACCDZ gutierrez_e_Page_023.txt
1081c4586de85ae7366afa0940595288
f6fb4bc5ca5057e57ab4490214d54b26ac779bae
50928 F20110113_AACBYU gutierrez_e_Page_066.pro
2129b2a9c2349a4c0d384c4d973a867e
9346b6714fa829c2f5354e6fd55db4e6b38b9260
182184 F20110113_AACCFD gutierrez_e_Page_088.jpg
301b5abd1fe525f5c14cb59013024770
45eeeb684ecb311e26626d17b950f3cb3c9fce1a
204138 F20110113_AACCEO gutierrez_e_Page_022.jpg
7a4c6e63043610ceb3610c5ba93aca7f
61418306891d7058129bcb2404afa211fd1fabbc
25557 F20110113_AACBZI gutierrez_e_Page_015thm.jpg
82a5c995f6ab9d53fed7ae278ff46de9
d368cf3f65f09405cefb445e549d2d7ed0d220d1
F20110113_AACBYV gutierrez_e_Page_091.tif
f08ab0f0e6f9d9a854579630f93fdf0b
917d7497fe5ea5e0001b657fc978bbb89562651d
158539 F20110113_AACCFE gutierrez_e_Page_100.jpg
5eaa34f3443f4cc6dee5acf5a71173ba
ac946d80af631ee3c2e077025ee0711c09dd7baa
35855 F20110113_AACCEP gutierrez_e_Page_025.jpg
63d9f0a10f9674550515100cdf236903
77cb3d4c7e67e5823526b3e1ba366f1b12f63bc7
177013 F20110113_AACBZJ gutierrez_e_Page_070.jpg
4f229f64cc21bb8abb432c5690cc309e
0cd25aa0d5a52a4fa316a36f6619a0a64fc6860e
44110 F20110113_AACBYW gutierrez_e_Page_061thm.jpg
b1ecb557a6f334f3044e1d648d2c40f8
d28f62af97dd363588e5abf91f3586412aabb6c3
21606 F20110113_AACCFF gutierrez_e_Page_001.jp2
9bba6903a0418311cdcadf8613c606fa
d330f016c68e11902c6ad9b26e5adf289eb335df
166090 F20110113_AACCEQ gutierrez_e_Page_032.jpg
ff1ba432fc403a53b16586308a87580f
32eff2e93e8f453bcf0adf747cbd70e12d31ad61
35755 F20110113_AACBZK gutierrez_e_Page_006thm.jpg
7baacfebed71c9fed62b60188683d225
90a22620585277fedb49ad382cf0b7cde46d7bb4
514479 F20110113_AACBYX gutierrez_e_Page_005.jp2
ea4c253b61b1bdf4e85b14f7fa448381
c9ceec55addc36459cf86f47b7bb16a73fc1cb40
66338 F20110113_AACCFG gutierrez_e_Page_003.jp2
e6ba975d6d684d2bb8683b075f687ff7
bdcdb936fecb5ad5fe67394a9a561f21c58bb2c6
180746 F20110113_AACCER gutierrez_e_Page_037.jpg
4546423175c68d7c82f8071aef1bd132
bbfe8b1c7f6abfc80ee3be4492cf50a8864ff68d
731807 F20110113_AACBZL gutierrez_e_Page_006.jp2
eb878b96e5731e949c4713f1f2c2e98c
166ae2b0d300da929f61866195d9eedf89ae0b61
920843 F20110113_AACBYY gutierrez_e_Page_023.jp2
55879ef341e56ac15f84197ae43e8445
c2052e67c331b3b7f900deb0c2cfbbd568e11740
91151 F20110113_AACCFH gutierrez_e_Page_012.jp2
77fb01a3723cdc3415b013e3f55a9ff9
e3bd81bc749b673554e3681ce0405e37b142ee24
240406 F20110113_AACCES gutierrez_e_Page_056.jpg
741c77f4b94285161630e6387bed6499
27dff96bd8c06407652ac8c24649274beaab1562
78752 F20110113_AACBZM gutierrez_e_Page_004.pro
673cf3a37625975bf7e3f764267d9959
2e5f92f3abe9a49d34c7f108b8231445b0612ddf
1532 F20110113_AACBYZ gutierrez_e_Page_057.txt
c940a38954be6063196e4df891882301
19ef643abd3c80c202844c557e313bb45218b96a
109314 F20110113_AACCFI gutierrez_e_Page_019.jp2
1bec241ee3c1ae286abaf8342bc111b5
e817fcd382ac743942894d1d31f3640806e54140
220792 F20110113_AACCET gutierrez_e_Page_066.jpg
e2bebb6961bf7e1a8e29525ef8278542
eab770a351e082b94ea09c2fcb5d922c66322605
938 F20110113_AACBZN gutierrez_e_Page_078.txt
8c97c725ba4182d6fb2f3b36839e6a20
3bec297f2a21b8b97b3609b7d7f1d63226fd76d7
101617 F20110113_AACCFJ gutierrez_e_Page_021.jp2
af7bbc2cea01b1f3b99e6b65b539e25c
304cca8c51a1aa07e139d0a4e49598728af9085a
214365 F20110113_AACCEU gutierrez_e_Page_067.jpg
1605fea2ad46390f4961731d94a5b55a
50edc46685df0de0fc6324c7943d19719ff613a2
F20110113_AACBZO gutierrez_e_Page_079.tif
6741e7d5c22b90e7c445960a6b168e38
e21f28c8b53df2dae646e9702ab16287e82126b8
109520 F20110113_AACCFK gutierrez_e_Page_024.jp2
f1a7d52d04e4de8dea356de64300b18b
34035396cfbdef10ac269763a4af0eed6ed36e87
179421 F20110113_AACCEV gutierrez_e_Page_072.jpg
bc91bb01cb25a5bc73d199f776309840
78698db4385f00b586612e0c507d00c7157e8570
77844 F20110113_AACBZP gutierrez_e_Page_100.jp2
bd56199c37fed090438ee6e5a126d17b
6cb6ff98fede29320b41f2275421076ccba4117a
18801 F20110113_AACCFL gutierrez_e_Page_025.jp2
457beb55f0fd7324929732a79d39c3b9
40730e1a8a7eec527099f125d6795ba0d6e138d6
181263 F20110113_AACCEW gutierrez_e_Page_077.jpg
6322aa3028b8dba18aa229ebfbb65396
d4298e9eecd649de415ae4956bfd37611d3a73ce
F20110113_AACBZQ gutierrez_e_Page_048.tif
b3d742f41bdbe988f61f5e131f8cbdab
01b60c705d94f58ec792aca720a1cdb3d2616049
F20110113_AACCFM gutierrez_e_Page_034.jp2
57c601b92fde2daed70ae275b513d4be
fe3f2c09d754b652f8ef1cf33ec5e4b8c7e975dc
178313 F20110113_AACCEX gutierrez_e_Page_079.jpg
c5775e6ad71f35ca1ca66fbd3b8ce5c9
0385fc7e15e9ee543e7bef361a12d94702390777
190694 F20110113_AACBZR gutierrez_e_Page_045.jpg
7660305b2301aaa3f236b8fbc049247f
71782c3727cd21f997a89e1297553f3699f801ee
983158 F20110113_AACCGA gutierrez_e_Page_079.jp2
3d5a3383b24bf0ab5a9b1332cd9f00ea
f6606d0788077d3e8428433c106a44170be15a10
184061 F20110113_AACCEY gutierrez_e_Page_080.jpg
1d4b0d6705541b85b1425633dce9d062
b1386dc11e0f087d013623fce39eae3012f892aa
F20110113_AACBZS gutierrez_e_Page_077.tif
677a3d9fff7fd774c9d4c5d7687a2679
55ce1c42f443350cd482a3d0267c7ab0ba88e814
993995 F20110113_AACCGB gutierrez_e_Page_082.jp2
e68dbf812d7eb4b7103fbba5a1fc2a7b
a1f6aab7cb619c4675b2c7b6059b724d49e9f55c
96779 F20110113_AACCFN gutierrez_e_Page_035.jp2
33bf0688da8c6efd13c3523308245eb8
d9b95fdb70e7f8e6cf6d1955120c218322cf6481
181514 F20110113_AACCEZ gutierrez_e_Page_081.jpg
4390be48bbe647d9e2dbc946a115d49d
ec7ac5e4b4165265c3686856ed142c3d50904549
96633 F20110113_AACBZT gutierrez_e_Page_029.jp2
58fce8b32f74f648849fd78ade5c4070
3d9047de3e600b6bd937a98168c38b23520f8964
994951 F20110113_AACCGC gutierrez_e_Page_084.jp2
41b6a2557ad511cc737263c61c40329c
4336cfaa618430682bcc37a6e577ccc75662ef19
100449 F20110113_AACCFO gutierrez_e_Page_036.jp2
3fd8baf6ee5518b533434a51266ef156
b1333f7dc2c8d359e10529021b711b635fcf75d8
837 F20110113_AACBZU gutierrez_e_Page_070.txt
4fab12c5f796304b68a535fea500077a
d5413ba76b156bee1393780efe10636a83f932d1
34312 F20110113_AACCGD gutierrez_e_Page_091.jp2
1a09c4cfae360d5c4849442840d207e8
877f2f62c1d6fdbaff10a53ca228d969a4338c5f
95962 F20110113_AACCFP gutierrez_e_Page_043.jp2
2470395b39ce767fbd2de3e3ded87fd4
fc94bb6fbf05761a59562adfde40797bc266a963
1792 F20110113_AACBZV gutierrez_e_Page_065.txt
298475989b3b37ec9d0f15ac4c5341ae
aebd0bf97d8b8ccd1dc24c337b06bad029cf1c93
F20110113_AACCGE gutierrez_e_Page_001.tif
44e5a3012db67886180ed5ca977c8348
f25b63288bf33fa29885d66d99ac71ed1b7c77d0
1051974 F20110113_AACCFQ gutierrez_e_Page_044.jp2
948a643f19a1c8f1852f14011d57e753
e929c6bea11117839fac71c1d0edda2750e2c23b
F20110113_AACBZW gutierrez_e_Page_015.tif
fc63d074bf4a135c9a41c58b67da4806
57d8f8b7d551c53668281ed4bb9068cd40ceb2ea
F20110113_AACCGF gutierrez_e_Page_005.tif
56e45d91913a6aebd73b7542b6ca8207
fed3e5e1a1c10b368a1a669e95ae511f610e24eb
879610 F20110113_AACCFR gutierrez_e_Page_046.jp2
2d1458b09f08f4d90936c032996a4520
a4b060e232b4dda2afcce8b15b63332afcaf09c2
84054 F20110113_AACBZX gutierrez_e_Page_093.jpg
c4ae465f5c2e4fdd524edd07352c93a0
64f33c8c4acfb031df3d14f0bd0d909cafb54443
F20110113_AACCGG gutierrez_e_Page_012.tif
b55d5691344f990a58244c3c545f363b
41746eb51d456e117a35db91e5b12527b18dc934
76957 F20110113_AACCFS gutierrez_e_Page_053.jp2
86b7bc873bbcfc122285e5c00d97fe7e
d1908c427432696df1c6545c3889dae7d3bc8d80
79846 F20110113_AACBZY gutierrez_e_Page_024.QC.jpg
880e88268271ac8f7da67cfc8e2eece0
1a32aaa10415866c81c79f50de2f7810c40929cd
F20110113_AACCGH gutierrez_e_Page_020.tif
82f501361916b913d285654e9d31adb9
065efe4aaa6d8d284ba4985b7a1bc8a73c60bb1d
1051970 F20110113_AACCFT gutierrez_e_Page_058.jp2
fad0ed8fef9fb2846b65a0cf2cd3065f
29e7d82778bbc74620ef5cc300ba91cf4dcc5867
44808 F20110113_AACBZZ gutierrez_e_Page_083thm.jpg
783e27a88c9b78dfafdf4251b3eac66f
6ebb834852aa07f00953c4434e65c335d972501f
F20110113_AACCGI gutierrez_e_Page_023.tif
945ad3cf69b457ac7307d1f75cfa2bdf
6c44332f3a8ab60573aee2ebaa97e0abc37ba54f
946837 F20110113_AACCFU gutierrez_e_Page_061.jp2
dcf648de57d7800eeb646f145b5e36c3
59dde7eb85da83192adf9eae3168837d70490064
F20110113_AACCGJ gutierrez_e_Page_029.tif
041f6b76de655ab4e75cf1c2909a0ccb
c76364da4107e384197bddd9ddd35a5176e06cb3
1051973 F20110113_AACCFV gutierrez_e_Page_062.jp2
3ca3d73945aa5362e28aec73921a44b3
e505ff05f1075cac5e128941a4ffae67759bc4d2
F20110113_AACCGK gutierrez_e_Page_034.tif
a826fd7e91fc7bc7e90fb3504b5851e8
cfe1414e6c525f9cf3a77ca2509b797af5a22292
439177 F20110113_AACCFW gutierrez_e_Page_064.jp2
38e7c8f25eaef2ab77c7bfb3f93916f3
f3529136e059709861b705f7515ca6a3dabec697
F20110113_AACCGL gutierrez_e_Page_039.tif
ad3e3e3b8b70879c9867cbda1d997b4f
16ba2d5f3702572c489aa3814e5301fb74f40bd1
112489 F20110113_AACCFX gutierrez_e_Page_066.jp2
668dfa30fbbc9a6195256310e3bbc1c1
50521563bcb8415979c6e7edb07fdf38f1ac53a4
F20110113_AACCHA gutierrez_e_Page_087.tif
341a15f8c607f508962d3301ac8dce90
11ccef14571f0dfa4a3936ce9f5b8bd3a9b60a78
F20110113_AACCGM gutierrez_e_Page_040.tif
34404e0eb8be3f9d16ceaea842d3e1b4
55612ada23c6c89ea26dbe5ded46a63baede5c5c
109429 F20110113_AACCFY gutierrez_e_Page_068.jp2
85b55b31f0921d2ed24daa30c7f0b1d4
3a929e2e0a3053378854424bbebd55e017fa8831
F20110113_AACCHB gutierrez_e_Page_098.tif
5f6985bb20722405b3894f48abd8320e
7e7f5a6c70ea986acaa858eed05879b29eb79ea8
F20110113_AACCGN gutierrez_e_Page_042.tif
cd0276e8591ff5e8839640a6d0e61a12
9a4ea2d8853a7db1f2bacebf457c186a8f44cf67
999084 F20110113_AACCFZ gutierrez_e_Page_078.jp2
ef55f026e66a6af39c4c15bb645d23cd
edc398131c45e5bd0929e0bb20c053250d6b49d9
28726 F20110113_AACCHC gutierrez_e_Page_003.pro
be0a65900d9aee683474e4e3c7e53168
fbe82445804a4f8b38c758a2a92589fa7d6f62a4
40969 F20110113_AACCHD gutierrez_e_Page_010.pro
61b5894f7b78316bfac5b941e8764b2a
c4b0b549a985c10f5d74f7b26c08a7a101695c44
F20110113_AACCGO gutierrez_e_Page_043.tif
a6285b8632fd507ead64d72fde0b9a04
b19e699cba2eb847520b31e6f85806aebf29a01a
36582 F20110113_AACCHE gutierrez_e_Page_011.pro
f9ee120fd7021436e021b234d01a6847
0f2fdc0f8167e0b51204e89bc47fd6805f8b7b11
F20110113_AACCGP gutierrez_e_Page_052.tif
b25a40adb5d914cd213fd46b7df8cecf
dd5a5e05fcd2fcc659a03af2ed19bb7d3c0fcd26
50636 F20110113_AACCHF gutierrez_e_Page_013.pro
6cc050978b82bc4da27631f11be5e3d9
13625723130f440d63e9724b53dfd01331d9a1a1
F20110113_AACCGQ gutierrez_e_Page_054.tif
c0264c7c1ae1585e5132c604097a1d36
f2736b43ff32e9ff20357c9490b3648ceaa8d006
51698 F20110113_AACCHG gutierrez_e_Page_014.pro
d6af29dd0d63d2bae5c42c10b70a3fca
157e7ecffee0c1ee1ff64a02164ffee416df8b99
F20110113_AACCGR gutierrez_e_Page_058.tif
6156d40b29494d6aad3447195f7a6879
29bf9ee613e4e5b9493e9f5d50dd19d6a48a148c
47562 F20110113_AACCHH gutierrez_e_Page_015.pro
27318e89bd4f24e7db6b29c98fab0be0
0a43195fbdf89d8cf24ca369e2144b5833bca47a
F20110113_AACCGS gutierrez_e_Page_059.tif
30a644680bc04e585e1341dff05cbf41
e98955a108bb9a4b9abbf702fd13156cbe9aec5f
34241 F20110113_AACCHI gutierrez_e_Page_023.pro
d00d1a747a54feae1041e8befab9d1b1
070937731af4924779435c98fb483fd9a657aadf
F20110113_AACCGT gutierrez_e_Page_060.tif
f3774aaaa3af45d4c5619db1da0744da
e3974b7d51360177c052d39c90d167944d7e38b7
50452 F20110113_AACCHJ gutierrez_e_Page_024.pro
b87dc80ee24f56db07529464cc1a4ed2
8eefa7c71d0ba105cb5fbde1471b0b0d05b50089
F20110113_AACCGU gutierrez_e_Page_063.tif
d9220b9568e190f5f88b6d850ec519e1
ec233009dfca36ecd766fae88bed73c3ba728691
6947 F20110113_AACCHK gutierrez_e_Page_025.pro
4286e321dbdccca68f42ac40b80195fc
b9c0fa319494659730c0a1b2e6afe7ee0a2f2174
F20110113_AACCGV gutierrez_e_Page_064.tif
47f740a94d9bfe1052adb258d00a9d26
e11af38150fd944817e654d1ea41feecd5a056dc
38826 F20110113_AACCHL gutierrez_e_Page_026.pro
dbef4ada8f58ed485f7af87093f1ed47
62fe2567350c36bedb2eab7fc081f42f13b02f2a
F20110113_AACCGW gutierrez_e_Page_067.tif
68dbe5191c349d703df865e06973bd31
c586903a4805e5e50b545da6321f260f3a47d727
17863 F20110113_AACCIA gutierrez_e_Page_080.pro
c78e093dbd8a2bf21f99a3d58cb0d05e
599e26465d7fc15aa8f5e2e6b18cf33fbced18e4
42951 F20110113_AACCHM gutierrez_e_Page_029.pro
ccb53a7a8bf7e478803bc3f8ace4d617
061795cb4fb396cfe5d1bfda37e7addb1e566fbc
F20110113_AACCGX gutierrez_e_Page_070.tif
6c1c064301d10ab0b020fc13465a9d15
47a37fe63790ef08cc9be68982c85ef204e36dee
17046 F20110113_AACCIB gutierrez_e_Page_082.pro
7e1b81313d3543ba390e175da5b34779
09f531a75c471e53d727b2d04946d105e28f2eee
35519 F20110113_AACCHN gutierrez_e_Page_031.pro
f8cd22eb9fdb8d37cfd7c0b718ecd9f6
11fc271b1dad1d2ef9c95887ba71a101831c728c
F20110113_AACCGY gutierrez_e_Page_076.tif
412e0f27b057b62018d519dc7b934cae
ffd4cb03f9398d0b7c494d1e8bf477bd2f6ce6f5
48566 F20110113_AACCIC gutierrez_e_Page_096.pro
56ab4ae9141476dae7f09abb48186923
e2ec393e103e0406c6d473d44435a8507d86d0de
37414 F20110113_AACCHO gutierrez_e_Page_033.pro
44781400ca45874d9257d19faafb0047
79e519647eb2f79a9f7613bf0708cf32def8b99e
F20110113_AACCGZ gutierrez_e_Page_078.tif
fd6706519c3dc80d1e9cac7fb3c8ac9d
c6994b8fc5abe8dc9e65aac19bf717d948819ab9
57091 F20110113_AACCID gutierrez_e_Page_098.pro
2cdce15659190b1936b67c9c74232982
ab5cc96b6538cf50091bfae9ef5ee859026bfc6c
405 F20110113_AACCIE gutierrez_e_Page_001.txt
9040fc4578b47bd22306cd4ed0d98398
ed28266c2008332f8dfe76df6ff7b0ef7aea275c
37651 F20110113_AACCHP gutierrez_e_Page_038.pro
d0a18186bb16aa78d7fd021fe02a47c0
2592c10b30257d967a6967719c0d6d7ba150e883
108 F20110113_AACCIF gutierrez_e_Page_002.txt
7e62cf9ed1db10b76b7bbeeaf30c16ec
ad59574e258a2d23e74abf4051199f8a60648d76
32471 F20110113_AACCHQ gutierrez_e_Page_040.pro
ffad6c3c9a4aefd24b2fd34059dca242
d40f42119f3b7bdea450f374bd385b065f5d6be1
1466 F20110113_AACCIG gutierrez_e_Page_011.txt
338d2d8fdf5eeaf311dfaa17f0f7d794
f3c3db28304f80cd984c5b3b8acfba10fd5cc3e0
26836 F20110113_AACCHR gutierrez_e_Page_052.pro
a48cfe45e7a8c54fd107f7641f6fb8a0
e7d47cec7866cd1782a2e6586b71fb2dad4d7c78
1219 F20110113_AACCIH gutierrez_e_Page_018.txt
b5fd3b837b5894afbefa808bd0fe1b1d
65e6c1de58f71d15872312f63acd32fe1de73b79
25603 F20110113_AACCHS gutierrez_e_Page_062.pro
9672c6155bcb48c87941df87d39e32fd
17ad545cc989e4959335a41b2f6f6ee28820dac1
1939 F20110113_AACCII gutierrez_e_Page_019.txt
e37b4498ee2f3096aa25198cffb3f7c6
06c9d433639bf0ae29586a1fcf95b625494d651c
50882 F20110113_AACCHT gutierrez_e_Page_068.pro
a1d9cb71203e9675edc94592ec67631a
d0a09c4d31bac6549dc9343bcae2f747b0d83b14
2230 F20110113_AACCIJ gutierrez_e_Page_022.txt
2bbc9794fd9e74b4fa0ff07cd46faaac
0d85b108aae92fa32b98e64c4f115ee3e265381a
16076 F20110113_AACCHU gutierrez_e_Page_070.pro
da4621cdd4909d7d843b163131aace63
ad4af22bb69d8e81fb8afd26bfa2d20c04b9d65c
326 F20110113_AACCIK gutierrez_e_Page_025.txt
69558030e9db96db739b64279b729bf1
d24698e4706e03f175a0440256731595d601e944
18242 F20110113_AACCHV gutierrez_e_Page_072.pro
79e61c3ecd22645d71817fea68ead043
91113a76ba5d1079b5cde28df6392ec8679d5ad9
1210 F20110113_AACCIL gutierrez_e_Page_028.txt
1517c1813ceabf1cb018e704467e0f0d
79ae20a4a2decbd04444cc8aa7b99d0cb2ae5db1
16666 F20110113_AACCHW gutierrez_e_Page_073.pro
5772d4b98a124bb034dce97797428aaf
33a78f41e1688d3d53545aeee1b3296576337088
1477 F20110113_AACCIM gutierrez_e_Page_031.txt
b3c8a5551d6d0e3d116a4e02ef2627c4
005eb3198ad7f51b37120d55c938e9c88e5f65a7
17898 F20110113_AACCHX gutierrez_e_Page_075.pro
eab9d9d372d1a32e0cbfe0d635a052de
dc34f57e07dc532bae21b7755583722747605999
2025 F20110113_AACCJA gutierrez_e_Page_063.txt
70094db1c07ef6578a580bcbd019c1a0
43a460cfc5eb5092c7edc50fc2da7e7a20c74e60
1610 F20110113_AACCIN gutierrez_e_Page_032.txt
aaa89ab70d821b9205ddfbd81a1709a6
048880544d5dd07c15b5ba29a58c888ae384a274
18064 F20110113_AACCHY gutierrez_e_Page_076.pro
6286804a3ac54b8c2af0de4cbbc02e12
3d374cceeb61e3431f7dfb5852e6b3900c3b8e20
426 F20110113_AACCJB gutierrez_e_Page_064.txt
3f23e2e62562c0d3cdd77ed11403df7f
46ac82af61bb2193d7790c1c9f74331014ed7dab
1655 F20110113_AACCIO gutierrez_e_Page_033.txt
ddc047a77c50f886a6f9cd7fb06b3a11
4127eb30ff2ee9034ce76864ebcf445b84035f0d
16775 F20110113_AACCHZ gutierrez_e_Page_078.pro
0314e9da7dd89d3d2b0fc60ae4e9989c
ba04804724042516249941f316af92e0a91d6adc
459 F20110113_AACCJC gutierrez_e_Page_069.txt
5e6dbdc0832115dfc76b2dcb06bbeb13
0aa5558a0c631185d333cce04f0f57214a81153e
1283 F20110113_AACCIP gutierrez_e_Page_034.txt
7b7e0a398ca64719bfacbc8c10051997
db800af3767b70e84ad254ba8fe29c090dfb6d80
964 F20110113_AACCJD gutierrez_e_Page_079.txt
4c329fcc3cb9f8e5e4f8ce13f331e25f
b3ac894acf0dd830dffa549107dc572eec2732dd
1008 F20110113_AACCJE gutierrez_e_Page_085.txt
60b77bb254bb3589aadab2039b98c2a0
bdf3ca36a32843e034d39f8a5acf1683b2b01d1c
802 F20110113_AACCIQ gutierrez_e_Page_037.txt
5a8b56b238548102500bfcaa0f310d71
7abf39a9faa2840581541a14af88d5a4461f4a28
1059 F20110113_AACCJF gutierrez_e_Page_086.txt
ab86367bdd090d2124525db4b425e18c
b253f970a942e250bdfaa63eacbc7b1cdca1f335
1771 F20110113_AACCIR gutierrez_e_Page_043.txt
5402decac7e1991b0d9f1c27b26de854
37cacd186f28a8d72afe7c3145f5b51dce128fc4
F20110113_AACCJG gutierrez_e_Page_087.txt
51f057f98ef9e570c2a3ec2e1c02d03a
45254c47571e7ea3b5e42f8092ce10066d0a712c
885 F20110113_AACCJH gutierrez_e_Page_089.txt
9a63689d276a3737be4abd7566d0c8b2
2ddcdb63b52f263d5ad1ebb72615cbdd6825b81a
1829 F20110113_AACCIS gutierrez_e_Page_045.txt
97db4d221659cd9db0bb8927440ea26f
8af6e3ffd1bc34b45e77e58cd697835e70f3f2b1
1098 F20110113_AACCJI gutierrez_e_Page_093.txt
b96fdf72249a6a5b3eae081023d7ae26
80026abcf5d3d887323072e2d2ef5a113054c41e
1429 F20110113_AACCIT gutierrez_e_Page_049.txt
a17b8c1e48e0b71879c314de2387a254
3dae23b71e3c6c049fe35a3a6c2ac22e02e97c9c
1057 F20110113_AACCJJ gutierrez_e_Page_095.txt
77724fb2e4b49e245d868ffbd7140e7e
4e8d79506bc36df3abeb279fdb3f2e07a432e9cf
2560 F20110113_AACCIU gutierrez_e_Page_053.txt
9673cfb4c5176eba5105a8c3c1859b56
f1bb9a9ecfb3269be84d55b640467a283728f427
2331 F20110113_AACCJK gutierrez_e_Page_098.txt
561e4af9fc8edaa0e5745d46fdd563c3
86138d5388048ef0c4f463d4a76a75e47dc46d14
1888 F20110113_AACCIV gutierrez_e_Page_054.txt
aba815fe092a32c143f65544d65aacf1
36796c3b40a06c1c09026882cafeed96bb1d5fc1
9679 F20110113_AACCJL gutierrez_e_Page_091thm.jpg
46bcbeedca5c44974f5b86b60dc3cb7e
19bd73d6c203d88dfa0105e7111499088d106b91
1822 F20110113_AACCIW gutierrez_e_Page_056.txt
4c8d91eb1124758e5c477475bfd1350b
cb693e44bd44f55d3b8a080063b143312eddb59d
25805 F20110113_AACCKA gutierrez_e_Page_066thm.jpg
509112a1274890f38b03ebc6c937c4a4
8bce5751d4a4eb4e22b8e0b37ea4ae79b98f2a4d
74451 F20110113_AACCJM gutierrez_e_Page_059.QC.jpg
d1ea8b970e254a7e87aac24418047f4e
4011699b31472a876227192b10aa969360088d0b
1943 F20110113_AACCIX gutierrez_e_Page_059.txt
eb5ac8b43a83e1660cd2f1df24fa55e8
25f33c8d36e1530f9ce1332722ec0309b76cc50e
59414 F20110113_AACCKB gutierrez_e_Page_100.QC.jpg
ca628e4d4c95d76cac4c82dce72dafe9
c76113e5db98d6304ffdab367b118d2dc415fb5d
23235 F20110113_AACCJN gutierrez_e_Page_043thm.jpg
ec1d5b9cda3e49c62b7c3d3d0785ea45
ae34cab89c3feed6947fc480565db00c8c81bb2a
1193 F20110113_AACCIY gutierrez_e_Page_060.txt
ba27bda70fbb613f52affc5eb49e8d06
e993f2089b42f35d49e5deb5dea82e60977d039c
82144 F20110113_AACCKC gutierrez_e_Page_097.QC.jpg
bdcd2b88ee43da70830eaf7c515d4a45
d0f525ec193bc849c54f24e7aefd434dfea4c64a
82024 F20110113_AACCJO gutierrez_e_Page_070.QC.jpg
c9783284bb983df58dc79d65c990558e
c71c82f163cdf985b623d8bb4c12433f424ec9da
971 F20110113_AACCIZ gutierrez_e_Page_061.txt
bba2b193015a80fbfdc36eaaa1c5dc77
8e28de419a1a066aa20435dd13a522f0c7a2d914
87760 F20110113_AACCKD gutierrez_e_Page_048.QC.jpg
2f2ae5a998e47ce4663bba90e83deb6c
7c022f12ec980d0f5a079b3e1e494f5475ac7c66
96181 F20110113_AACCJP gutierrez_e_Page_058.QC.jpg
400b6748e32ae409a9ac0cfcf7eb616c
3ba9286b906f7d5d17c95bd58f63a059aac8b890
58737 F20110113_AACCKE gutierrez_e_Page_006.QC.jpg
994483eae23455677021235af34d3a9b
cde98352cd807e2b4a0990aaf8dbb9b98ddf23fa
93780 F20110113_AACCJQ gutierrez_e_Page_062.QC.jpg
75cbce05f9b834c92f7b518e64bd6494
245b2f0afc2ec0d00853eea0a690d835d5211373
84572 F20110113_AACCKF gutierrez_e_Page_042.QC.jpg
fafccce4f860f789e48c3388f1bbb197
1d662da0799d65b5b748350250618072e7ea56ac
51898 F20110113_AACCKG gutierrez_e_Page_052.QC.jpg
d19a0fc522c88788496565d3b12e0acc
952b2c286e34dee8797891ad8ef3a7819ca779f3
65593 F20110113_AACCJR gutierrez_e_Page_029.QC.jpg
9b403eda455e87bfea1281c57c0dc9a0
9db8b4cf173ad99315652f6dc4591491c716cf61
85421 F20110113_AACCKH gutierrez_e_Page_077.QC.jpg
8df018b214b53eedf58cb733cce958ee
ddcf176b326c0e8cf8fc3b0c9ee89881fa66c4ed
44916 F20110113_AACCJS gutierrez_e_Page_090thm.jpg
9ce57319da48edc54e5df9018589d290
5f7d6bb7de829c29b703480a7509bff3688a95d6
81383 F20110113_AACCKI gutierrez_e_Page_013.QC.jpg
d34851c73c3fca87edc7983ed992bce8
785b0ce0682abb85c7d1cc8f25e222773c35a538
47508 F20110113_AACCJT gutierrez_e_Page_038thm.jpg
049ac0ccf8942c60699dfb2bbf74730f
aea89dd9b36ff93b0a575576980b71ae49747894
13270 F20110113_AACCKJ gutierrez_e_Page_025.QC.jpg
cd911b93ac71e1552aa131d7151fc468
ce98459fde72d1bdcf2529dcbed60dff1e9c659f
59588 F20110113_AACCJU gutierrez_e_Page_033.QC.jpg
e39f64169ee44a81c88b45c2ea548162
2644f11a9d527125e6239098a41221e64b075987
44948 F20110113_AACCKK gutierrez_e_Page_089thm.jpg
4834802681a1010577e003cbe1e58902
0f56e47659c24fba1266752cf0419c4ca982461c
44578 F20110113_AACCJV gutierrez_e_Page_079thm.jpg
8ae81620d6b5468e3fd5f40baf9597dd
d01180d8436b6c03a3c799b94a122a2fe55165c5
10272 F20110113_AACCKL gutierrez_e_Page_094thm.jpg
39901ad074c37af0d3f9f52680504944
6cb32e10b09540746702e6b9437732a9f9c70adb
23538 F20110113_AACCJW gutierrez_e_Page_041thm.jpg
9b9dee3e55f50c513e3720dc455a9993
2f7ed978e33195612a6645866e26135764881dff
45340 F20110113_AACCKM gutierrez_e_Page_062thm.jpg
f8208fc655d74f4ab8a6b8a63124b434
028a6092b605896b521b38df72237996e5a0aadb
49025 F20110113_AACCJX gutierrez_e_Page_007thm.jpg
b189c2f75bf07725d8637cf6bd5f7404
eb48906bd14d8b49e97ffdd54d9f7a1cd6c9220f
49572 F20110113_AACCLA gutierrez_e_Page_003.QC.jpg
7520ae355b3d9bc4017e360a85e7e197
f72157a7a3cb9fe02b07c971a7cd01fd5184768e
69540 F20110113_AACCKN gutierrez_e_Page_096.QC.jpg
512f713f14008237f7d3ad5a3857ed49
0ec118ef0700c1caa888ac72fe4d477b24323af4
85811 F20110113_AACCJY gutierrez_e_Page_080.QC.jpg
939b57ee3897d08a867a40dfdc10b4b5
e89db9143b6124d8b442c421d64b4db8ca02d14d
46816 F20110113_AACCLB gutierrez_e_Page_005.QC.jpg
18fac6c3ee1628132dda31bdc30fe616
ba7f9bad5168cd424bbbc70783cfa4ffec50e06c
62568 F20110113_AACCKO gutierrez_e_Page_032.QC.jpg
0c6e9aba95882bd19662cc108cdafe6e
108e2565c51f8bc370ead74c5d9fb108fe18c9b8
3349 F20110113_AACCJZ gutierrez_e_Page_002thm.jpg
825d9ad9ce65df71c7f578824e578ba6
6fa664ccd70c86ac564ef41d446c496ac4c632bd
57538 F20110113_AACCLC gutierrez_e_Page_008thm.jpg
684a218e7d3a14eaca2e5bf1174b9022
b34e63b0dbc2467e1c56ed31ba9bba7d61a76ee5
23528 F20110113_AACCKP gutierrez_e_Page_035thm.jpg
5905f4cc8dab0ceabcb205af2377d3cc
263e3e137cb5ecf216444337b862f119c787260c
18091 F20110113_AACCLD gutierrez_e_Page_011thm.jpg
ff066b104e80e858aea3c2b8a65b437c
b7c21c1b116d0e04244e66c39bf376f93d9ad459
10887 F20110113_AACCKQ gutierrez_e_Page_092thm.jpg
a2aabcfc1d9da193f90ad03053868d32
523824540b5d0f9e901daee2dc3c76a03b086ace
64108 F20110113_AACCLE gutierrez_e_Page_012.QC.jpg
4cca9fa829134a1b0c57159b1ed6bccd
522ca2f528070ebab561a9682437babec077296f
44058 F20110113_AACCKR gutierrez_e_Page_046thm.jpg
c3c85b15a12d4ce4fc68f8f03e3b6e3a
1b2b6f21bf0eda6a30d0e6cbf167fabfed0a5fd5
80577 F20110113_AACCLF gutierrez_e_Page_019.QC.jpg
44ae361a7e4d57933cc021ac6557c04e
d8868c11d3dbd1bacbd5f49b8d7b4525aea618d8
89653 F20110113_AACCLG gutierrez_e_Page_047.QC.jpg
be4164b4d46d05c33c6bba7eb77f13ae
749d6d59d43ee7e2fa45f5e9e329139110016e57
22496 F20110113_AACCKS gutierrez_e_Page_096thm.jpg
7beed9bb7e4ea743244089cd3035f1ed
e0452375b91d6cf1584482f23baa114672eaa033
56163 F20110113_AACCLH gutierrez_e_Page_053.QC.jpg
a475f9ddb17f3362d7ce1fb28a70787c
20316ec3b1e5f0ff2d327a9b75b4eba69ff641f3
29889 F20110113_AACCKT gutierrez_e_Page_093.QC.jpg
a5fe8f8c17b896df69500bc6504600f4
d728975cd81e8acefef7ccfbe889218d288342d2
24380 F20110113_AACCLI gutierrez_e_Page_059thm.jpg
5132a491b5701921582b4373f61d270d
12982111fe8b1a22ca37ec4e6189c304e27a187d
25237 F20110113_AACCKU gutierrez_e_Page_097thm.jpg
ed8cdaaabadf9ee9af312be1a656081c
bebfae5daa3d6d561aeb7a71b6c29c7a5145578b
91668 F20110113_AACCLJ gutierrez_e_Page_060.QC.jpg
67fe63b1587c9293cbb034a3b22e4fe2
264fb7ca04b6fe2903ab1db4acd09c91a312819b
84639 F20110113_AACCKV gutierrez_e_Page_075.QC.jpg
c0680ed225dc0f5fe8509efa34f4efd9
3c2da5e515286e7e97fc5c40b0e0f5967660d34e
45234 F20110113_AACCLK gutierrez_e_Page_063thm.jpg
64dad8c539e4b38a40e20cfcaa7ba4c2
3f8e5d3dfa763d7229ba2bab0894b896bc2a72cd
86116 F20110113_AACCKW gutierrez_e_Page_082.QC.jpg
c38a5c6edaf7ad08703641f859e2f228
0e05d5d05d94fbccbbdc2d447203fd4ee37b2d01
54068 F20110113_AACCLL gutierrez_e_Page_064.QC.jpg
38042776d96fbf19689291f4a5068042
4b478b0cc074a77dde60d7d3c2fe8c1e85bfab54
106411 F20110113_AACCKX gutierrez_e_Page_007.QC.jpg
2989db95e2936f3d01ecc25c71161914
af44d7d0c0e121183c9bf13815a430a10140a117
44852 F20110113_AACCLM gutierrez_e_Page_081thm.jpg
a798dfb6e1e0620e04806c7e709ccdc9
1c4915755d394ba2664c8224b04bab68708bf27f
25692 F20110113_AACCKY gutierrez_e_Page_014thm.jpg
48ccb0a53020f66e491a1b70939840e3
8db33bb90464edb94ae704facad8eb2a486c904b
26285 F20110113_AACCLN gutierrez_e_Page_098thm.jpg
bfe5a476ea2e201679889ca576d2f99f
3b47ebb91b6a02063834d598e57a890ccdd7540e
152923 F20110113_AACCKZ UFE0004905_00001.xml
835bd65679bea28ccbf5a4a1785f2f52
3664cbd93d0ebb82b6a6bac270547bb724503708
22270 F20110113_AACBKL gutierrez_e_Page_012thm.jpg
99c6c7a9f66a37bfe6c7f3e86728f630
dc7f03f8c1c90c5e0ea3b39ced71346ae4c9f965
25761 F20110113_AACBLA gutierrez_e_Page_069.jp2
973da2d8a280b524e435dd1e892c065d
e8cee4ae77c70d7ffdf425a08c94173a514ec43f
82008 F20110113_AACBKM gutierrez_e_Page_011.jp2
58b30e0f3761bd23041eddfa90fd1dae
180494c8ee5a8e7adea55c5878819baffe386149
80071 F20110113_AACBLB gutierrez_e_Page_017.QC.jpg
afa3b1c090bb1f49935ec41db1574370
18d3784ff42a77df6e0dfc278caab0c6ef29eded
77940 F20110113_AACBKN gutierrez_e_Page_037.QC.jpg
3e4d6e36183474f1f4934bec40be210e
6d526d0d17acad45aa529cef1d700dd7eb4d098b
103883 F20110113_AACBLC gutierrez_e_Page_030.jp2
838b17cff6738b53b28a749e4ed3bacb
241211b58d9c68bd770d0ab1cec0f402ce41a64e
1092 F20110113_AACBKO gutierrez_e_Page_052.txt
1dfa8e6ea341aad4fc9df6daf4d617a9
9ad570ad6355bc5f3c08baad315a1f454321a227
F20110113_AACBLD gutierrez_e_Page_073.tif
7fa40b052876e1d139752c96d8085b1f
1b2637d8cd8118d81ffd779dd2f9ca19dff42543
F20110113_AACBKP gutierrez_e_Page_031.tif
4555eda11bc9bec4379e98459f3f1667
d72cfb958dd261fca6b0d2494cab71fc199668e8
959375 F20110113_AACBLE gutierrez_e_Page_071.jp2
2105470f3683e143f1bda97e45d89e76
fca62204121aecdca73dc3a7386ec6949b4f6869
85394 F20110113_AACBKQ gutierrez_e_Page_086.QC.jpg
451d940b085a34a23b02ef0b9124159d
36889a7c1b9fda550eadc980df85c89d4ab2e5e7
18260 F20110113_AACBLF gutierrez_e_Page_087.pro
28d9572c559fdd1bbd617083d824498a
f6a74fc5b5ff32f4a62096bfa710c705ff65b620
25780 F20110113_AACBKR gutierrez_e_Page_051thm.jpg
2171ef5528049b522ac6c6bb7c31b384
7ced061e563691aaab0d1d84873407836198cfcd
246192 F20110113_AACBLG gutierrez_e_Page_018.jpg
887fe628a85f266f81e84d95afdba92b
6bbc36ca400a5a95d569fc91a4c9e811d1b22fea
1020 F20110113_AACBKS gutierrez_e_Page_072.txt
afa3131886e60453e1aa95a9b4bf2ac9
64a39a7347f7c5e39f497f0d32165b1f0d9e13d8
178709 F20110113_AACBLH gutierrez_e_Page_076.jpg
3b87ad99ff3e746c51c82598380466ca
ad5d7adc28f8a2a8d6db1829657cce962ce641af
70419 F20110113_AACBLI gutierrez_e_Page_055.QC.jpg
227e4029bc2e0fd9662ed9ffbdbd7e8d
b0cded80c2de77e0f19ed51297c8c909e3fe6c02
32519 F20110113_AACBKT gutierrez_e_Page_094.jp2
2b7686b9276a2949699ebd4ebf984f5e
fd437ce8e83acef90da798a6cb96353c5df1ee27
177505 F20110113_AACBLJ gutierrez_e_Page_071.jpg
8fdbed1be3597a9f1ac845e8128f1bfb
06bb4b7e495b939a3af8913aa48c6b56e90d59a5
F20110113_AACBKU gutierrez_e_Page_041.tif
bf1205b6df8dddb53c20692dec9ecbf8
18e5230749d04ee4e9646e001a4ffb44b79cd2fa



PAGE 1

EFFECTS OF LONGSHORE CURRENTS ON RIP CURRENTS By ENRIQUE GUTIERREZ A THESIS PRESENTED TO THE GRADUATE SCHOOL OF THE UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF SCIENCE UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA 2004

PAGE 2

This document is dedicated to my mother and father.

PAGE 3

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS This research was funded by the 2002-2004 and 2004-2006 Florida Sea Grant Program. I would like to thank Andrew B. Kennedy for his academic guidance and support in the research leading to the present thesis. I would also like to thank Robert. J. Thieke for providing financial assistance and giving me the opportunity to be part of a very exciting project, and Robert G. Dean for his help and for serving on my supervisory committee. I would also like to thank Oleg A. Mouraenko for his support and guidance with Matlab, if I have any skills with Matlab it is thanks to him. I also want to thank Jamie MacMahan, who gave me guidance ever since I got here. I would like to thank all of my office mates and friends in Gainesville in general, for making my stay here a very good experience and especially my roommate, Vadim Alymov. I will never forget all of them. Finally I would like to thank my family, especially my parents, who made many sacrifices to provide me with financial support to get my undergraduate degree back in Spain. They have always been there for me. iii

PAGE 4

TABLE OF CONTENTS Page ACKNOWLEDGMENTS.................................................................................................iii LIST OF TABLES.............................................................................................................vi LIST OF FIGURES..........................................................................................................vii CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION........................................................................................................1 Problem Statement and Objective................................................................................1 Background: Literature Review....................................................................................3 Physical Description of Rip Currents....................................................................5 Forcing Mechanisms of Rip Currents and Longshore Currents............................9 Forcing of longshore currents......................................................................10 Forcing of rip currents..................................................................................10 Generation of Vorticity........................................................................................12 Outline of the Thesis...................................................................................................13 2 NUMERICAL MODEL.............................................................................................15 Theoretical Background..............................................................................................15 Rip Current Scaling....................................................................................................17 Numerical Description of the Model..........................................................................18 3 RESULTS AND ANALYSIS.....................................................................................21 Mean Peak Offshore Current in the Rip Neck............................................................21 Parameter (D / Dt) Estimations.........................................................................22 Method 1......................................................................................................22 Method 2......................................................................................................24 Model Comparisons with Lab Data.....................................................................25 Effects of Background Longshore Current on the Rip Current..................................32 Steady Forcing.....................................................................................................32 Velocities in the rip neck..............................................................................34 Vorticity.......................................................................................................37 Jet angle evolution with increasing background longshore current.............40 Unsteady Forcing.................................................................................................41 iv

PAGE 5

Velocities in the rip neck..............................................................................44 Vorticity.......................................................................................................46 4 SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS.........................................................................54 APPENDIX A MEAN VORTICITY MAPS......................................................................................59 B LOCATION AND WIDTH OF THE JET DATA.....................................................80 LIST OF REFERENCES...................................................................................................85 BIOGRAPHICAL SKETCH.............................................................................................89 v

PAGE 6

LIST OF TABLES Table page 3-1 Unsteady forcing simulations...................................................................................42 B-1 Alongshore location and width of the jet for steady forcing....................................80 B-2 Alongshore location and width of the jet for unsteady forcing with amplitude 0.25...........................................................................................................................81 B-3 Alongshore location and width of the jet for unsteady forcing with amplitude 0.5.82 B-4 Alongshore location and width of the jet for unsteady forcing with amplitude 0.7583 B-5 Alongshore location and width of the jet for unsteady forcing with amplitude 1....84 vi

PAGE 7

LIST OF FIGURES Figure page 1-1 Rip current parts: feeders neck and head (from Shepard et al., 1941).......................7 1-2 Time-averaged vorticity...........................................................................................12 2-1 Definition sketch of the model.................................................................................17 3.1 Sketch of wave breaking over a bar.........................................................................23 3-2 Experimental wave basin at the University of Delaware.........................................26 3.3 Current meter location..............................................................................................27 3-4 Wave height and MWL versus cross-shore distance at the center bar (left) and at the rip channel (right) for test E...............................................................................28 3-5 Cross-shore velocities in the rip: model predictions vs. lab data.............................29 3-6 Cross-shore velocities in the rip: model predictions vs. lab data.............................31 3-7 Snapshots of the simulations for different background longshore currents with steady forcing...........................................................................................................33 3-8 Computed mean velocities on a longshore profile at x = -0.5..................................35 3-9 Mean peak offshore velocities with increasing background longshore currents at different cross-shore locations.................................................................................36 3-10 Mean peak offshore velocity versus background longshore current........................37 3-11 Mean vorticity maps for steady forcing...................................................................38 3-12 Mean vorticity maps for steady forcing...................................................................39 3-13 Jet angle vs. background longshore current.............................................................41 3-14 Comparison of the simulations for steady and unsteady forcing.............................43 3-15 Mean peak offshore velocities in the jet at the cross-shore location x = -0.5 for different amplitudes..................................................................................................45 vii

PAGE 8

3-16 Mean peak offshore velocities in the jet at the cross-shore location x = -0.5 for different frequencies.................................................................................................46 3-17 Mean vorticity maps for unsteady forcing with amplitude 1 and frequency 1.........47 3-18 Alongshore location and width of the jet at x = -0.5 with increasing longshore current for each amplitude........................................................................................49 3-19 Alongshore location and width of the jet at x = -0.5 with increasing longshore current for each frequency........................................................................................50 3-20 Alongshore location and width of the jet at x = -0.5 with increasing group amplitude for each frequency...................................................................................51 3-21 Alongshore location and width of the jet at x = -0.5 with increasing group frequency for each amplitude...................................................................................52 3-22 Mean vorticity map for unsteady forcing with amplitude 1, frequency 1.5and background longshore current of 0.75......................................................................53 A-1 Mean vorticity map for steady forcing.....................................................................59 A-2 Mean vorticity maps for unsteady forcing with amplitude 0.25 and frequency 0.5.60 A-3 Mean vorticity maps for unsteady forcing with amplitude 0.25 and frequency 1....61 A-4 Mean vorticity maps for unsteady forcing with amplitude 0.25 and frequency 1.5.62 A-5 Mean vorticity maps for unsteady forcing with amplitude 0.25 and frequency 2....63 A-6 Mean vorticity maps for unsteady forcing with amplitude 0.25 and frequency 2.5.64 A-7 Mean vorticity maps for unsteady forcing with amplitude 0.50 and frequency 0.5.65 A-8 Mean vorticity maps for unsteady forcing with amplitude 0.50 and frequency 1....66 A-9 Mean vorticity maps for unsteady forcing with amplitude 0.50 and frequency 1.5.67 A-10 Mean vorticity maps for unsteady forcing with amplitude 0.50 and frequency 2....68 A-11 Mean vorticity maps for unsteady forcing with amplitude 0.50 and frequency 2.5.69 A-12 Mean vorticity maps for unsteady forcing with amplitude 0.75 and frequency 0.5.70 A-13 Mean vorticity maps for unsteady forcing with amplitude 0.75 and frequency 1....71 A-14 Mean vorticity maps for unsteady forcing with amplitude 0.75 and frequency 1.5.72 A-15 Mean vorticity maps for unsteady forcing with amplitude 0.75 and frequency 2....73 viii

PAGE 9

A-16 Mean vorticity maps for unsteady forcing with amplitude 0.75 and frequency 2.5.74 A-17 Mean vorticity maps for unsteady forcing with amplitude 1 and frequency 0.5......75 A-18 Mean vorticity maps for unsteady forcing with amplitude 1 and frequency 1.........76 A-19 Mean vorticity maps for unsteady forcing with amplitude 1 and frequency 1.5......77 A-20 Mean vorticity maps for unsteady forcing with amplitude 1 and frequency 2.........78 A-21 Mean vorticity maps for unsteady forcing with amplitude 1 and frequency 2.5......79 ix

PAGE 10

Abstract of Thesis Presented to the Graduate School of the University of Florida in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Science EFFECTS OF LONGSHORE CURRENTS ON RIP CURRENTS By Enrique Gutierrez May 2004 Chair: Robert J. Thieke Major Department: Civil and Coastal Engineering A simplified conceptual representation of a rip current system was used to study the effects of longshore currents on rip currents. The numerical model used for this study is based on a generation of vorticity approach, where oppositely signed vortices are continuously released on either side of the rip channel and let free in the system; and a background constant and uniform longshore current is also added to the system. A flat bed, no bottom friction and no wave-current interaction are assumed in the model. Since generation of vorticity is the only physical process represented in the model, its applicability is strictly limited to the rip neck area, where this process is assumed to be dominant. Velocities in the rip current depend only on the strength of wave breaking and time scales depend both on wave breaking strength and length scales of the system. Performance of the model was tested against measured laboratory data. Despite the high simplicity of the model, very reasonable results were obtained in comparison with the measured data. The model predicts well the trend of the data although overestimates velocities in the rip. The main challenge to apply the results of the model to field or x

PAGE 11

laboratory data is the estimation of the generation of circulation within the surf zone. Two different methodologies were tested. The model was used to study the effects of longshore currents on rip currents, using both steady and unsteady forcing. Mean velocity fields and vorticity maps within the area of the rip neck were calculated. Steady forcing results showed a very strong effect of the longshore current on the rip current, with nearly constant offshore velocities for small longshore current strengths, decreasing quickly as the longshore current increases in strength. A wide range of unsteady forcing parameters (group amplitude and frequency) was used to test the relative importance of this parameters in the evolution of the rip current with increasing longshore current strengths. Results suggest that the background longshore current strength is the main factor in the behavior of the rip current. Effects of background longshore current are reduced for large group amplitudes. Influence of the frequency is found to be almost negligible, with response decreasing with higher frequencies. The model could be used to evaluate strength of rip currents under a wide range of wave climates, with simple scaling relations for rip current strength and wave breaking strength within the surf zone. Model results could be coupled with existing rip current forecasting indexes. xi

PAGE 12

CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION Problem Statement and Objective Throughout the world, much population concentrates in the coastal regions. Beaches are one of the preferred recreational areas, attracting a great amount of people and tourism in general, thus becoming an important economic and social factor for the coastal regions. Researchers have been studying rip currents for decades now, and they have become an area of interest due to their importance in nearshore morphodynamics but also the increasing public concern with safety at the beaches all over the world. Nowadays, the general public is more aware of the dangers of rip currents thanks to information campaigns, and lifeguards are specifically trained to respond to these events; however, the number of casualties at the beach is still quite large, and a better understanding of the behavior of rip currents, specially their response to different wave climates, is still needed. The nearshore ocean is a very complex region, where many different processes take place and create a very dynamic system. In a simple approach to the problem, the waves arrive to the beach and break, losing energy in the process and transferring momentum into the water column, thus generating currents. Depending on the incident wave angle, alongshore currents (oblique incidence) or nearshore circulation cells (shore-normal incidence) will be generated. These currents will drive sediment transport impacting beach morphology and can cause erosion, potentially affecting coastal real estate. 1

PAGE 13

2 When circulation cells form, the seaward directed flow, often observed as a narrow jet, is known as a rip current. Currents can reach up to 2 m/s and they cause thousands of rescues per year in Florida alone, with more deaths due to rip currents than any other nature disaster related source combined. On average, 19 people have died in Florida per year since 1989 due to rip currents (Lascody, 1998). It is then a major concern and of public interest to understand rip current behavior, what causes them and how they respond to different factors. A considerable amount of effort has been invested in fieldwork and laboratory experimentation to better understand the behavior of rip currents. Fieldwork has proven to be very difficult due to unsteadiness of rip currents, both temporal and spatially, also a great number of instruments are necessary to cover the entire area of interest. New video techniques and collaborative efforts between several institutions might provide better data sets in the future. A limited number of laboratory experiments have been conducted over the years but usually over a single fixed topography, a wider range of rip current morphology and wave forcing would be desired. Recently, a number of numerical studies have been conducted to study rip currents generated with alongshore varying wave heights using phase-averaged techniques. This study focuses on a barred beach with rip channels, and is a continuation of the work published by Kennedy (2003), A Circulation Description of a Rip Current Neck. A simple conceptual model, using generation of vorticity and circulation at the edges of the bar-channel on a barred beach was used to describe the behavior of rip currents in the area of the rip neck. A simple scaling was introduced which collapses all rip current topographies to a single form and makes it possible to estimate the relative importance of

PAGE 14

3 the different factors that modulate rip current strength. Although the model was compared to lab data, here we will use additional data and analyze the performance of different estimations of the mean rate of generation of circulation (using equations from Brocchini et al., 2004), which is the basic parameter to scale strength of rip currents with this model. Longshore currents are almost always present to some degree; when the waves approach the coast with an angle and break, the transfer of momentum in the surfzone will drive longshore currents. Sonu (1972), while studying rip currents of the Gulf coast of Florida, described how if the waves came with an angle, meandering currents would form within the surfzone as some form of interaction between longshore and rip currents. Up to date, it is not well understood how important these interactions may be, and what relative magnitudes of longshore current are required to modify the offshore flow of the rip and turn it into a meandering current system. This is not only an interesting scientific topic, but also might be of use for public safety if threshold conditions could be determined for the formation of rip currents under oblique incident waves. The present study will explore this, by simply modifying the conceptual model described by Kennedy (2003), adding a background longshore component to the system. The response of the rip will be studied under many different forcing conditions (steady and unsteady) and background longshore currents strengths. Some insight to the problem will be addressed. Background: Literature Review Researchers have been studying rip currents for over 50 years now. There have been a number of field experiments studying rip currents, although many of these observations were qualitative and very few quantitative measurements were collected. These measurements are generally limited to the rip area and are difficult to obtain due to

PAGE 15

4 the difficulty in locating the instruments in the rip channels, which tend to be temporally and spatially unstable [Shepard et al. (1941), Shepard and Inman (1950, 1951), McKenzie (1958), Harris (1961,1964), Sonu (1972), Cooke (1970), Sasaki and Horikawa (1979), Bowman et al. (1988), Smith and Largier (1995), Chandramohan et al. (1997), Aagaard et al. (1997), Brander (1999), Brander and Short (2000,2001)]. Another approach to the problem is to use video images from shore. Rectified video images have been used for the quantification of physical processes in the nearshore (Holland et al., 1997). Ranasinghe et al. (1999) used averaged video images to study long-term morphological evolution of the beach under the presence of rip currents and possible generation mechanisms. In contrast, the controlled environment of the lab allows experimentation of rip currents in much more detail, however limited laboratory experiments have been conducted to date [Bowen and Inman (1969), Hamm (1992), Oh and Dean (1996), Drnen et al. (1999, 2002)] of interest here is the laboratory setup at the Center for Applied Coastal Research of the University of Delaware, where a number of rip current experiments have been conducted [Haller et al. (1997), Haller and Dalrymple (1999), Haller and Dalrymple (2001), Kennedy and Dalrymple (2001), Kennedy (2001), Haller et al. (2001) that provided a comprehensive map of waves and currents, including the details of the mean water level variations, Haas (2002)] on a fixed bar-channel bathymetry. The availability of costly instruments like ADVs (Acoustic Doppler Velocimeter) or ADCPs (Acoustic Doppler Current Profilers) is usually limited so it is difficult to obtain information about the whole flow domain. An alternative to this is the use of

PAGE 16

5 drifters, which have been used in the field in limited cases [Shepard and Inman (1950), Sonu (1972)], and more recently, Schmidt et al. (2001), who applied direct drifter tracking using Global Positioning System (GPS) but the relatively high cost of the drifters limited their availability. In the laboratory environment, Thomas (2003) used numerous video tracked Lagrangian drifters with the laboratory setup from Haller et al. (1997). The concept of radiation stresses developed by Longuet-Higgins (1964) provided a basis to numerically describe the generation of rip currents with alongshore varying wave heights using phase-averaged techniques. Bowen (1969) theoretically explored the generation of circulation cells within the surfzone using alongshore-varying radiation stresses. A number of numerical studies have been conducted, for example Haas and Svendsen (1998) and Chen et al. (1999), who used the fully nonlinear extended Boussinesq equations of Wei et al., (1995), to model the laboratory setup by Haller et al. (2001), providing valuable insights into rip current behavior. Slinn and Yu (2002) investigated the effect of wave current interaction on rip currents and showed that it might be an important factor, weakening the strength of rip currents. In this section, several aspects of rip currents, including vorticity generation within the surf zone and longshore currents will be reviewed from previous literature. Physical Description of Rip Currents Rip currents can be the most visible feature of nearshore circulation systems. They are strong, narrow currents that flow seaward through the surf zone, often carrying debris and sediment, which gives the water a distinctly different color and surface texture from adjacent waters (Komar, 1998). Rip currents can extent several surf zone widths seaward exchanging water between the nearshore and offshore. They have been observed all over

PAGE 17

6 the world, on a wide range of beach types but are particularly common on beaches that are dominated by a longshore bar-trough morphology (Wright and Short, 1984), which is the focus of this study. They can also form due to interaction with coastal structures like piers, groins or jetties (Shepard and Inman, 1950; Wind and Vreugdenhil, 1986) or when longshore currents are directed offshore by a protrusion in the bathymetry or headland (Shepard and Inman, 1950). The concept of rip current was first proposed by Shepard (1936) (as opposed to the popular name of rip tides, since they were found not to be related to tides). In the early twentieth century, it was believed that bathers were pulled out of the surf by a violent undertow, a current beneath the surface that would carry out the water piled up the beach by the incoming waves. Davis (1925) was the first to challenge this popular idea. Lifeguards and experienced swimmers were aware of these rip-tides that often carried bathers beyond to depths in which they could not stand. Shepard (1941) gave a first qualitative description of the rip currents, defining three main parts, which he called the feeders, the neck and the head (see Figure 1-1). Feeder currents are flows of water that run parallel to shore just outside the beach from either side of the rip, one of these currents usually being dominant, that feed the main outward-flowing current or rip neck, which moves at high speeds in narrow lanes through the breakers essentially at right angles to the general coastal trend. Maximum flow speeds of up to 2 m/s and 1.3 m/s in the rip neck and feeders respectively have been recorded in the field (Brander, 1999) although the flow was found highly unsteady. Water enters the neck not only from the feeders but also to some extent from the sides of the rip channel farther out (Shepard 1941, Brander and Short 2001). Along the path of the neck,

PAGE 18

7 usually a channel can be found which can be as much as 1m deeper than the adjacent bar, indicating that the flow extends through the entire water column. Beyond the breakers, the current spreads out and dissipates in what is called the rip head; along the side of the advancing head, eddies are often observable, turning to the right on the right side of the rip, and to left on the left side (Shepard, 1941). The flow separates from the bottom and is mainly confined to the surface, which is supported by no evidence of channels beyond the breakers. Figure 1-1: Rip current parts: feeders neck and head (from Shepard et al., 1941). Field observations of rip currents have shown long period oscillations in rips on the wave group time scales (25-250s) of up to 0.4 m/s [Shepard et al. (1941), Shepard and

PAGE 19

8 Inman (1950), Sonu (1972), Aagaard (1997), Brander and Short (2001)]; although these measurements were not accompanied by wave measurements offshore and alongshore the rip channel, so that relationships between rip currents and wave groups could not be established. Munk (1949) and Shepard and Inman (1950) suggested that there is a maximum set up within the surf zone when the largest short waves in a group break, resulting in a transport of water shoreward that is discharged most efficiently through the rip channels during the subsequent small short waves of the wave group, Sonu (1972) hypothesized that rip current pulsations were due to infragravity standing waves. MacMahan et al. (2004), based on measurements obtained in the Monterey Bay, CA experiment (RIPEX) concluded that rip current pulsations on that beach were due to infragravity cross-shore standing waves. Shepard et al. (1941) stated that records obtained off the coast of Southern California showed a clear relation between intensity of rip currents and height of waves. McKenzie (1958), based on observations on sandy Australian beaches, noted that rip currents are generally absent under very low wave conditions but are more numerous and somewhat larger under light to moderate swell. This represents an important consequence for the morphology of the area, since erosional power of rips will significantly increase under stronger currents. Another factor that seems to be of importance in modulating the strength of rip currents is the tide. Numerous field observations in different types of beaches support this idea. McKenzie (1958) noted a prevalence of rip currents during falling tides and attributed this to the concentration of the drainage system into the current channels, resulting in stronger flows. Cooke (1970) off the coast of Redondo Beach, CA observed

PAGE 20

9 that stationary rip channels were commonly present but well defined rip currents were only present during falling or low tide. Sonu (1972) at Seagrove Beach, FL observed modulation in rip current intensity with the tide which was attributed both to confinement of rips to narrower regions in the surf zone and stronger breaking during low tide, thus increasing the transfer of momentum in the surf zone which drives the currents. Brander (1999) and Brander and Short (2001) conducted experiments at Palm Beach, New South Wales, Australia. Rip current velocities reached maximums at low tide and minimum velocities at high tide, the state of morphological beach evolution was found to be an important factor as well. Drnen et al. (2002) showed in their laboratory experiments that rip current velocities increased with increasing wave height and decreasing water level. A third factor in the occurrence of rip currents is the wave angle. Sonu (1972) observed closed circulation cells only under the presence of shore normal waves while meandering alongshore currents would form under oblique incidence. The numerical study by Kennedy (2003) provided valuable insights in the response of rip current strength to different factors. Temporal response was found to be dependant both on length scales of the system and the strength of wave breaking. Velocities only depended on the strength of the wave breaking but not on the channel width. Also, it was found that rip current response to unsteady wave forcing was strongly dependent on the group forcing frequency, with stronger response to low frequencies, decreasing quickly for high frequencies. Forcing Mechanisms of Rip Currents and Longshore Currents The first suggestions as to the cause of rip currents were based on the concept of an onshore mass transport of water due to the incoming waves. This water, piled up on the beach would provide the head for the out flowing currents.

PAGE 21

10 Understanding of the forcing driving the currents within the surf zone was greatly enhanced when Longuet-Higgins and Stewart (1964) introduced the concept of radiation stress to describe some of the nonlinear properties of surface gravity waves. Radiation stress was defined as the excess flow of momentum due to the presence of waves. It can be decomposed in three terms: Sxx, radiation stress component in the direction of the waves; Syy, radiation stress component in the transverse direction of the waves and Sxy, the flux in the x direction of the y component of momentum. S Forcing of longshore currents When waves propagate obliquely into the surf zone and break, this will result in a reduction in wave energy and an associate decrease in which is manifested as an applied longshore thrust on the surf zone (Dean and Dalrymple, 1984). For straight and parallel contours, thrust per unit area is given by: xyS yF xSFxyy 1.1 The longshore wave thrust per unit area is resisted by shear stress on the bottom and lateral faces of the water column (Longuet-Higgins, 1970 a, b). Forcing of rip currents In general, rip currents are contained within nearshore circulation cells that are driven by periodic longshore variations in the incident wave field. There have been a number of theories proposed as to the generation mechanisms for these longshore variations in the incident wave field. They could be divided into three categories: Wave-boundary interaction mechanisms. Wave refraction over non-uniform bathymetry can cause convergence in some areas (headlands) while causing wave divergence in other areas (canyons) thus resulting in high and low waves respectively in these areas. An example of rip currents generated by this

PAGE 22

11 mechanism at La Jolla, CA is described by Shepard and Inman (1951) and Bowen and Inman (1969). Wave-wave interaction mechanisms. Bowen and Inman (1969) proposed a model for generation of circulation cells under the presence of edge waves, where rip currents are located at every other anti-node and rip spacing is equal to the edge wave length. Dalrymple (1975) used two synchronous wave trains that approach the beach from different directions to generate longshore variations in incident wave height. Instability mechanisms. Generation of rip currents on plane smooth beaches can be explained based on instability theories, where a small initial variation on the wave field can result in the generation of regularly spaced rip currents [Hino (1975), Iwata (1976), Dalrymple and Lozano (1978), Falqus et al. (1999)]. However, once the rips erode rip channels in the initially longshore uniform beach, the wave field becomes topographically controlled and the circulation can last long even after the initial source of longshore wave field variability has diminished or even disappeared. Using momentum balance in the direction of the waves, Longuet-Higgins (1964) showed that radiation stress induces changes in the mean water level creating steady pressure gradients that balance the gradient of the radiation stress: dxdShgdxdxx1 2.1 Bowen (1969) exploited the concept of wave set-up to analytically describe the generation of circulation cells in the nearshore using a transport stream function. However, as irrotational forcing, wave induced set-up itself cannot generate circulation (Brocchini, 2003). When the waves break there is a decrease in the radiation stress which leads to an increase in the set-up, but also this is manifested as a wave thrust or force. If there is differential breaking alongshore this will generate differential forces which will generate circulation.

PAGE 23

12 Generation of Vorticity Although generation of vorticity within the surf zone is quite common, direct observations of vorticity are very difficult to obtain. Smith and Largier (1995), using acoustic techniques, observed rip current vortices with radii in the order of 10s of meters. Schmidt et al. (2001), using direct drifter tracking with GPS technology observed vorticity within the surf zone. In the laboratory, Thomas (2003) observed time averaged vorticity in the vicinity of a rip channel, with four distinct macrovortices, two of them spinning with opposite sign on either side of the rip channel and two more shoreward of those spinning opposite to them (see figure 1-2). Figure 1-2: Time-averaged vorticity; contour = 0.1/s; Positive =>Dashed line, Negative =>Dash-Dot line, and Zero =>Solid line (from Thomas, 2003) Peregrine (1998) and Bhler (2000) showed theoretically how differential wave breaking (e.g., at the flanks of wave trains) generates vorticity which re-organizes in the form of large-scale horizontal eddies with vertical axis or macrovortices. In the case of alongshore bar-rip channel topography, this generation of circulation is focused at the edges of the bar, where there is a strong variation in the longshore direction on the wave

PAGE 24

13 breaking. There is oppositely signed generation of vorticity on either side of the channel, which causes mutual advection offshore of the generated vorticity; this mechanism was showed by Peregrine (1999). Bhler and Jacobson (2001) conducted a detailed theoretical and numerical study of longshore currents driven by breaking waves on a barred longshore uniform beach. An assumed offshore variability in wave amplitude was necessary to generate differential breaking and thus generate vortices. Strong dipolar vortex structures evolution produced a displacement shoreward to the bar trough of the preferred location of the longshore current, a phenomenon that has been often observed on real barred beaches. Outline of the Thesis The present Chapter 1 introduces the problem under study and the objectives of the thesis, and then an extensive literature review is conducted introducing the various significant concepts relevant to this work as follows: a) physical description of rip currents, b) forcing of currents in the surf zone, both longshore and rip currents and c) generation of vorticity in the surf zone. Chapter 2 analyses the numerical model used in the study. First, a theoretical background is given to justify the model, which leads to the discussion of the rip current scaling that forms the basis of the model and links the model predictions with actual measured data. Finally a detailed numerical description of the model is given. Chapter 3 is divided in two parts. First, the model predictions are compared with available laboratory data, for this, results with no background longshore current are used since all the available laboratory data are based on shore normal waves. Secondly, several model runs with a range of background longshore currents are analyzed, both for steady and unsteady forcing. The relative importance of the model parameters (background

PAGE 25

14 longshore current and unsteady forcing parameters: amplitude and frequency) is discussed. Chapter 4 summarizes all the results and analysis and conclusions will be drawn. Suggestion for future research and applications of the model will also be given.

PAGE 26

CHAPTER 2 NUMERICAL MODEL The main goal in the development of this numerical model was developing a very simple model, both to get fast computational times and to study the scaling of the different processes present on a rip current. This model was originally written by Kennedy (2003), simple modifications have been included to study the effects of background longshore currents in the system. This chapter will discuss the theoretical background that leads to a simple representation of rip currents (conceptual model), the scaling parameters and dimensional analysis that makes possible this model, and finally a numerical description of the model. Theoretical Background Although rip currents are part of a very dynamic system, with quite complex forcing, a simple description can be achieved if we focus on an area where one of these processes is dominant. That is the case of the rip neck, where oppositely signed circulation and vorticity are the dominant processes. One of the most common rip current typologies is the one consisting of a longshore bar with gaps or rip channels on it. This kind of topography induces a differential wave-breaking pattern that is more or less stationary on hydrodynamic scales. Although migration of rip currents has been observed on the field (Ranasinghe et al, 1999) the time scales are much larger. Generally, there will be strong wave breaking on the bar and weak or no breaking at all on the rip channels. 15

PAGE 27

16 Peregrine (1998), using the NLSW equations and a bore dissipation model, showed how differential breaking along a wave crest generates circulation and vorticity, and that considering a closed material circuit that crosses the bore only once, the instantaneous rate of change of circulation generated equals the rate of loss of energy by the water passing through the bore. Vorticity can be defined as: dlU 1.2 In the case of alongshore bar-rip channel topography, this generation of circulation is focused at the edges of the bar, where there is a strong variation in the longshore direction on the wave breaking. There is oppositely signed generation of vorticity on either side of the channel, which causes mutual advection offshore of the generated vorticity (Peregrine, 1999). New vorticity will continue to be generated at these locations and then be self-advected offshore and so on. This is the predominant forcing mechanism in this area, the so-called rip neck and all other mechanisms will be neglected. It will be the basis for the numerical model therefore the region where the model is valid is limited to the rip neck area. Rip currents have been observed combined with longshore currents in the field numerous times, these observations show either oblique rip currents or the formation of meandering currents (Sonu, 1972). These different phenomena could certainly affect very differently the incautious swimmer; a better understanding of the formation of either one would then be useful. In order to study the development of these phenomena and behavior of rip currents with present longshore currents the original numerical model (Kennedy 2003) was modified to include a background longshore component.

PAGE 28

17 Rip Current Scaling The model uses three independent parameters to define each different case or run. These are: The half width of the rip channel R The mean rate of generation of circulation DtD The mean background alongshore current v Figure 2-1. Definition sketch of the model. In order to be able to use the simple representation of a rip current system described above for a real case (lab experiment or field measured rip), there is a need to relate the different variables in the real system to the ones present on the model. Using a simple dimensionless group analysis, the different variables scale as follows: Length scales: Ryxyx,, Velocities: 21,,DtDvuvu Time: RDtDt21 t Circulation: 21DtDR Therefore, we will need to determine what R and DtD are in the field (lab experiment) and then scale everything accordingly. Estimating R is relatively easy; more

PAGE 29

18 of a challenge is the parameter DtD (strongly dependant on the local topography and wave breaking strength), two simple methodologies to estimate it will be discussed in chapter 3. Using this scaling has great advantages; the simple length scaling allows us to use a single configuration for the system, with all different topographies converging to a single form. In the case of absence of a background longshore current (shore normal waves) all different possible wave strengths are represented by one non-dimensional case. When longshore currents are present, the non-dimensional longshore current becomes an additional parameter to define the model. The provided scaling suggests that velocities in the rip neck depend on the strength of wave breaking, scaling with 21DtD but not on the gap width Temporal response will depend both on wave breaking strength and length scales R R These scaling relations discussed by Kennedy (2003) provide a simple way to scale strength and temporal responses of rip currents not available in the literature previous to this paper. 21DtD Numerical Description of the Model As described above the numerical model is based on a circulation-vorticity approach, no other processes are represented in the model, such as wave-current interaction, 3-D topography (flat bed), bottom friction, forced and free infragravity waves, instabilities and others. This leads to a highly numerical simplicity of the model, but its applicability will be limited to the rip current neck area, where circulation and vorticity generation are assumed to be the dominant process.

PAGE 30

19 Essentially, the system is based on the generation of vorticity at two fixed locations on either side of the rip channel (x, y) = (0, 1) using a discrete vortex method. Positive x coordinates are located shoreward f the generation of circulation and negative cross-shore locations are seaward of the generation of circulation. The model is written in terms of mass transport velocities. Using the relation for point vortex velocities, r U 2 the model calculates the velocity U at every discrete vortex in the domain as the one induced by all other vortices present in the domain, then displaces them using a simple Euler method: tUYXYXttt,, 2.2 Strong interaction between consecutively introduced vortices requires a separation of time scales in the model, therefore the model releases the discrete vortex pairs in the system at intervals of t, defined as t = Nt, where 20 N 125 (runs used in the present thesis have values for N of 50 and 100) and t is the small time step at which vortices are being displaced. Therefore, there are two kinds of time steps, the big time steps t, which determine the generation of new vorticity at the generation points, and the small time steps t, at which the discrete vortices present in the system are displaced according to the velocity induced by all other vortices in the system at their location. When using steady forcing, the mean generation of circulation has a fixed value of one in the model. Choosing different values for t will allow some tuning in the model since the strength of the discrete vortex pairs is dependent on t so that the mean rate of generation of circulation is kept constant at one. The values used for t in this thesis were 0.03, 0.04 and 0.05; good convergence was obtained with these values so the DtD

PAGE 31

20 less computational demanding value of 0.05 was predominantly used. Also small random perturbations are added to the strength of each vortex to allow sinusoidal perturbations to form. Unsteady forcing can be used in the model by modulating DtD with a sinusoidal component, defined in the input file by an amplitude a (values used in the analysis range from 0
PAGE 32

CHAPTER 3 RESULTS AND ANALYSIS In the first part of the chapter, model results will be compared to available laboratory data in an attempt to test the model performance compared with measured data. Since most of the available lab data is based on experiments with shore normal waves (due to the difficulty of avoiding reflection at the lateral walls of the basin), only model results with no background longshore currents could be compared to lab data. In the second part of the chapter, the effects of longshore currents on rip currents will be studied using the model results; no lab or field data were available for comparison. Both steady forcing and group forcing were used. Mean Peak Offshore Current in the Rip Neck In the following subchapter the ability of the numerical model (described in chapter 2) to obtain reasonable results will be discussed. In order to evaluate its performance comparisons with measured data will be performed. Two sets of available lab data will be used, the first set from Kennedy and Dalrymple (2001) and other experiments performed by Kennedy and the second set from Haller et al. (2002). The model is written in terms of mass transport velocities and works with non-dimensional quantities; therefore the lab data will be scaled using the scaling relationships provided in chapter 2. Velocities scale with the square root of the mean rate of generation of circulation as follows: 21

PAGE 33

22 21),(','ODtDvuvu 1.3 In order to compare measured velocities with model predictions, these will be transformed into mass transport velocities (using measured local wave height to calculate short wave mass transport) and then will be plotted against estimated mean rate of generation of circulation. Two methodologies to evaluate the model parameter DtD will be discussed. Parameter (D / Dt) Estimations Estimations of the parameter DtD mean rate of generation of circulation, are necessary to compare model predictions with measured data in the lab as stated above. This is not an easy task since measurements of vorticity are quite complicated to obtain. Therefore, a methodology that allows the use of alternative measurements (wave heights, topography, mean water levels) is necessary. Brocchini et al. (2003) proposed two different methodologies to estimate the rate of generation of circulation due to differential breaking along a wave ray, they are based on the wave forced Non Linear Shallow Water Equations (NSWE). Method 1 The first methodology needs as inputs topography and offshore wave conditions, and is based on assumptions on the breaking over the bar. The estimated mean rate of generation of circulation DtD along the wave ray (which is assumed shore normal) is (e.g., Brocchini et al., 2003): )(8)(165222CCBghhhgDtD 2.3

PAGE 34

23 Where is the ratio of wave height to water depth (0.78) (depth limited breaking); is a constant that relates water depth to wave height assuming the breaking continuous over the bar ( ChH where 45.0 ), is the water depth at the bar crest and is the water depth at the start of breaking, which can be estimated using the following equation for shore-normal waves breaking in shallow water (e.g., Dean & Dalrymple, 1984): Ch Bh 5154522gCHhgOOB 3.3 Where and C are the wave height and group velocity in deep water respectively. Figure 3.1 shows a sketch of breaking over the bar (from Brocchini et al., 2003). OH gO Figure 3.1: Sketch of wave breaking over a bar (from Brocchini et al., 2003). The main characteristic of this approach is the use of predicted processes instead of using measured local quantities, probably limiting the accuracy of the methodology. However, it is easier to apply because it doesnt require measurements in the surf zone, especially if field data were to be compared with the model.

PAGE 35

24 Equation [3.2] estimates the generation of circulation due to the breaking over the bar, assuming there is no breaking in the rip channel. This is probably not true in many cases, especially in the field, where some breaking will take place in the channel. Therefore this methodology only considers the maximum possible generation of circulation in the system due to the differential breaking in the alongshore as discussed by Peregrine (1998). A possible fix to this problem would be the introduction of a parameter (less than 1) that would diminish this estimated generation of circulation. Method 2 Wave-induced setup is an irrotational forcing and therefore cannot generate circulation. However, the same breaking wave forces generate setup and circulation so setup may be used to estimate the generation of circulation across a breaking event in some mildly restrictive situations (Brocchini et al. 2003). In their paper, Brocchini et al. came up with an expression that links the change in mean water surface elevation across a breaking event (with corrections for the irrotational pressure setdown associated with the waves) with the rate of generation of circulation across that breaking event: sdAsdBABBAggDtD 4.3 Where B A are the measured mean water surface elevations after and before the breaking event respectively, and sdB sdA are the irrotational pressure setdown associated with measured wave heights at those same locations. This second methodology is then based on locally measured data, both wave and setup fields, which suggests a better accuracy in the prediction than the first methodology.

PAGE 36

25 Method 1 assumes that there is no breaking in the channel thus gives the maximum possible rate of generation of circulation due to the breaking over the bar. Equation [2] estimates DtD in one line so as long as we have data available in the channel we can account for the breaking in the channel diminishing the generation of circulation in a more realistic manner. Model Comparisons with Lab Data Using the methodologies previously discussed, model predictions will be compared to available lab data sets. Two data sets will be used, both from experiments performed at the directional wave basin at the Center for Applied Coastal Research of the University of Delaware: Data set 1: Kennedy and Dalrymple (2001) and Kennedy (2003). Data set 2: Haller et al. (2002) The wave basin is approximately 17.2 m in length and 18.2 m in width, with a wave-maker at one end that consists of 34 paddles of flap-type. The experimental setup consists of a fixed beach profile with a steep (1:5) toe located between 1.5 m and 3 m from the wave-maker and a milder (1:30) sloping section extending from the toe to the shore of the basin opposite to the wave-maker. The bar system consists of three sections in the longshore direction with one main section approximately 7.2 m long and centered in the middle of the basin (to ensure that the sidewalls were located along lines of symmetry) and two smaller sections of approximately 3.66 m. placed against the sidewalls. This leaves two gaps of approximately 1.82 m wide, located at and of the basin width, which serve as rip channels. The edges of the bars on each side of the rip channels are rounded off in order to create a smooth transition and avoid reflections. The

PAGE 37

26 seaward and shoreward edges of the bar sections are located at approximately x = 11.1 m and x = 12.3 m respectively (Figure 3-2). The crest of the bar sections are located at approximately x = 12 m with a height of 6 cm above their seaward edge. Figure 3-2: Experimental wave basin at the University of Delaware, (a) Plan view and (b) cross section (from Haller et al., 2002) If the experiments are considered as an undistorted Froude model of field conditions with a length scale ratio of 1/30, then the experimental conditions correspond to a rip spacing of 270 m and rip channel width of 54 m. The Haller dataset would

PAGE 38

27 correspond to breaking wave heights of 0.8-2.3 m, wave periods of 4.4-5.5 s, and mean offshore velocities of 0.8-1.7 m/s in the rip neck. The first dataset was analyzed by Kennedy (2003); here it will be analyzed together with Hallers dataset, which expands the range of wave conditions (larger waves). It consists of measurements of offshore wave conditions and cross-shore velocities in three different locations (in the alongshore) of the rip neck. Although the 3 ADVs were located relatively close together, (see figure 3-3) there are significant differences in the measured velocities probably due to jet instability of the rip current. (Haller and Dalrymple, 2001). To address this, the largest and smallest means of the three ADVs are plotted together with the mean of all three ADVs as an error bar plot. Figure 3.3: Current meter location in Kennedy (2003), ADV 1 (y=13.52m, x=11.8m); ADV 2 (y=13.72 m, x=11.8m); ADV 3 (y=13.92m, x=11.8m) Hallers dataset consists of mean values of the measured cross-shore velocities in the rip, and wave heights and mean water levels along cross-shore profiles on the bar and the channel (see figure 3-4). Although velocities were measured in a wide range of locations within the rip channel these mean velocities will be assumed to be the mean rip

PAGE 39

28 neck velocities for comparisons with the model. For detailed information on location of instruments see Haller and Dalrymple (1999). Figure 3-4. Wave height and MWL versus cross-shore distance at the center bar (left) and at the rip channel (right) for test E (from Haller et al., 2002) Both data sets and the model predictions are shown in figure 3-5. Model predictions are shown at two locations, at the cross shore location where the two fixed generation points are (0,0), where the model predicted quantitatively well velocities at startup (see Kennedy, 2003) and at a shoreward location from that point (0.5,0), which seems to better fit the lab data. The error bars in red represent Kennedys data and Hallers data is shown in blue symbols.

PAGE 40

29 Figure 3-5: Cross-shore velocities in the rip: model predictions vs. lab data. Model predictions at (0,0) and (0.5,0); Kennedy, 2003 (red error bars); Haller, 2002 [method 1 (squares), method 2 with no breaking in the channel (circles), method 2 with breaking in the channel (triangles) The availability of mean water levels and wave heights along profiles on the bar and channel allows us to use method 2 to estimate the generation of circulation. Due to very shallow water there are some gaps in the data on the profiles on the crest of the bar (see figure 3-4), therefore it is difficult to determine the end of the breaking event on the bar and the channel profiles. For comparison reasons, the farthest offshore point in the profile is taken as point A, and the measurement just shoreward of the bar is taken as the point B to apply equation [3.4] for all the experiments. Method 2 is applied both considering the breaking at the channel thus diminishing the generation of circulation (triangles) and neglecting the breaking in the channel (circles) so that it can be compared to method 1 (squares), which neglects any breaking in the channel. Looking at figure 3-4,

PAGE 41

30 it seems like method 1 overestimates by almost a factor of two the generation of circulation (some estimates are out of range in the figure) as compared to method 2, probably due to an overestimation of the breaking over the bar. Method 2 applied to both the bar and the channel seems to concentrate all the data in a narrow range of rates of generation of circulation, which doesnt make much sense since larger waves should generate larger circulation. A reason for this could be the relative location of the circulation cells, which would move offshore for larger wave experiments, but since equation [3.4] is applied at the same cross shore locations for all the cases we could be looking at locations situated too far shoreward where a second circulation cell of opposite sign forms (as described in Haller, 2002). It seems like the lack of data in the bar crest area mentioned before limits the applicability of this methodology. Figure 3-6 shows the model predictions plotted versus the lab data using methodology 1 for both data sets, so that they can be compared. Hallers experiments consists of larger waves, therefore the predicted DtD is larger. In general the model predicts very well the trend of the data, although it seems to over predict the velocities on the rip. For larger waves (Hallers data), the trend for the velocities seems to flatten out, obtaining lower velocities than expected, the reason for this could be the relative location of the velocity measurements with respect to the generation points being displaced shoreward since larger waves will break farther offshore. Also, when breaking occurs past the bars there will be breaking in the channel as well, diminishing the amount of circulation generated.

PAGE 42

31 Figure 3-6: Cross-shore velocities in the rip: model predictions vs. lab data. Model predictions at (0,0) and (0.5,0); Kennedy, 2003 (red error bars); Haller, 2002 (blue squares) (Both applying method 1). Kennedy (2003), showed a good quantitative prediction of the velocities at startup at the location (0,0), although past the initial peak measured velocities decayed more than in the model. This was attributed to the effects of wave-current interaction starting to take part. This could be one of the reasons why the model over predicts the velocities, but other neglected physical processes like bottom friction, 3D effects, etc are probably not negligible here. Also, relative location of the measurement points with respect to the generation points is certainly difficult. This could be adjusted with some kind of constant parameter to decrease predicted velocities, however if the model is used as a predictive tool it would give predictions that are conservative.

PAGE 43

32 Effects of Background Longshore Current on the Rip Current As described on chapter 2, the original numerical model used in Kennedy (2003) was modified to include an additional parameter v, which represents a constant and uniform background longshore current in the system. This background non-dimensional current scales as any other velocity in the system with 21DtD In this subchapter, the effects of different background alongshore-current strengths on the rip current will be studied. First, steady forcing will be used to analyze the evolution of the jet with increasing background longshore currents. Estimations for the angle of the jet and mean offshore peak velocities will be given. In the second part, unsteady forcing will be used with a number of different parameters for the group forcing. The effects and relative importance of the different parameters will be analyzed. Steady Forcing A number of different background current strengths were used with steady forcing in the model ranging from 0 to 1 dimensionless unit at increments of 0.05. Model runs of 50 dimensionless time units were used with different computational resolutions (t). Once the data files were obtained from the model, a series of matlab routines were used to obtain velocity fields within the area of the rip neck and also maps of mean vorticity. Velocities at any location were calculated as the sum of all the induced velocities by each vortex present in the system using the relation for point vortex velocities. The vorticity with time was defined as the sum of the strength of all vortices present in predefined boxes in the system divided by the area of the box.

PAGE 44

33 0 0 2 4 y/Rt = 5(a) v = 0 0 0 2 4 y/Rt = 10 0 0 2 4 y/Rt = 15 0 0 2 4 y/Rt = 20 0 0 2 4 x/Ry/Rt = 25 0 0 2 4 x/Ry/Rt = 30 0 0 2 4 y/Rt = 5(b) v = 0.25 0 0 2 4 y/Rt = 10 0 0 2 4 y/Rt = 15 0 0 2 4 y/Rt = 20 0 0 2 4 x/Ry/Rt = 25 0 0 2 4 x/Ry/Rt = 30 0 0 2 4 y/Rt = 5(c) v = 0.5 0 0 2 4 y/Rt = 10 0 0 2 4 y/Rt = 15 0 0 2 4 y/Rt = 20 0 0 2 4 x/Ry/Rt = 25 0 0 2 4 x/Ry/Rt = 30 0 0 2 4 y/Rt = 5(d) v = 0.75 0 0 2 4 y/Rt = 10 0 0 2 4 y/Rt = 15 0 0 2 4 y/Rt = 20 0 0 2 4 x/Ry/Rt = 25 0 0 2 4 x/Ry/Rt = 30 Figure 3-7. Snapshots of the simulations for different background longshore currents with steady forcing, positive vortices are plotted in red and negative vortices in blue: a), b) 0v 25.0 v c) 50.0 v d) 75.0 v

PAGE 45

34 The introduction of a background longshore current in the system has dramatic effects as can be seen in the in figure 3-7, where snapshots of the system in time from the start of the simulations are shown. In figure 3-7 a) a simulation with no background current is shown. The sequence shows how two macrovortices form at the start of the simulation and then, as they continue to increase in strength they interact with each other and get advected offshore. After this vortex couple leaves the generation area, the rip neck behaves as a turbulent jet. This behavior is observed for all the different background longshore current strengths in figure 3-7, although the size of the initial macrovortices is decreased with increasing longshore current strength as the macrovortices are pushed downstream before they can reach higher strength. These initial macrovortices result in a peak in the offshore velocity in the rip neck, and a decline in the velocity follows once the turbulent jet-like flow is established. Looking at the stronger longshore current cases, it seems apparent an increase in the interaction between the vortices from either side of the rip channel would cancel each others effects as they have opposite signs (vortices shown in two colors to indicate opposite signs). Velocities in the rip neck Velocity time series were obtained for alongshore profiles located at different cross-shore locations (x = 0, x = 0.25, x = 0.5, x = 0.75, x = 1). In order to avoid turbulent jet instabilities and possible local interaction with passing point vortices, averages of the velocities were performed without taking into account the initial peak in cross-shore velocities due to the formation of the macrovortices.

PAGE 46

35 The location of the jet was defined by the one-third highest offshore velocities for each alongshore velocity profile. Once the velocities within the jet were located, their average was defined as the mean peak offshore velocity (see figure 3-8). 0 1 .5 .5 0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 x/R y/R v = 0.25 Figure 3-8. Computed mean velocities on a longshore profile at 5.0 x Figure 3-9 shows the mean peak offshore velocities plotted against increasing background longshore currents. Peak offshore velocities increase farther offshore as the jet narrows for small background longshore currents, however as the longshore current strength increases this pushes the vortices downstream causing more interaction between opposite sign vortices (canceling their effects), thus decreasing the offshore velocities more quickly. The velocities were plotted only as far as 1 x because the applicability of the model is limited to the rip neck area and other physical processes would become dominant that far offshore.

PAGE 47

36 Velocities at are influenced by the presence of two discontinuity points, the source points where the new point vortices are inserted in the system. From now on we will be looking at the velocities at the location 0x 5.0 x since it is far enough from those discontinuities but close enough so that generation of vorticity and circulation remains the dominant physical process. 0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2 1.4 upeak vs vbackground at different x locationsvbackground (dimensionless)upeak (dimensionless) x = 1 x = 0.75x = 0.5 x = 0.25x = 0 Figure 3-9. Mean peak offshore velocities with increasing background longshore currents at different cross-shore locations Figure 3-10 shows the evolution of the mean peak offshore velocities with increasing background longshore currents at the cross-shore location 5.0 x for different computational resolutions (e.g., time increment at which a new vortex pair is introduced in the system). Good convergence is obtained with the model for all different resolutions, which allows us to use the less computationally demanding resolution of 05.0t

PAGE 48

37 The plot shows a strong effect of the background longshore current on the rip current strength. Almost constant values of the mean peak offshore velocity are observed for low values of the background longshore current v 3.0 vv with a rapid decrease for larger values v. For background longshore currents of the offshore currents become very small. As stated above, since there are no other dissipative mechanisms the main reason for this rapid decrease in the offshore velocity is the higher interaction between oppositely signed vortices, which cancels out their effects as the longshore current strength increases. 8.0 0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2 1.4 upeak vs vbackground at location x = 0.5with different computational resolutionsvbackgroundupeak (dimensionless) res = 0.03res = 0.04res = 0.05 Figure 3-10. Mean peak offshore velocity versus background longshore current Vorticity Since the model is based on the generation of point vortex pairs within the rip neck area, it is very straightforward to obtain measures of vorticity in the system. Mean

PAGE 49

38 vorticity values at any time for predetermined boxes (of size 0.25 by 0.25 dimensionless units) are the sum of the strength of all the individual point vortices contained within each particular box divided by the area of the box. Mean vorticity maps (see appendix A) were obtained by averaging with time the instantaneous measures of vorticity in the domain. Cross shore (dimensionless)Alongshore (dimensionless) v = 0a)Measure of mean vorticity in the system .5 .25 0 0.25 0.5 0 1 0 1 2 3 4 5 Cross shore (dimensionless)Alongshore (dimensionless) v = 0.1b) .5 .25 0 0.25 0.5 0 1 0 1 2 3 4 5 Cross shore (dimensionless)Alongshore (dimensionless) v = 0.2c) .5 .25 0 0.25 0.5 0 1 0 1 2 3 4 5 Cross shore (dimensionless)Alongshore (dimensionless) v = 0.3d) .5 .25 0 0.25 0.5 0 1 0 1 2 3 4 5 Figure 3-11. Mean vorticity maps for a) 0 v, b) 1.0 v, c) 2.0 v and d) 3.0v

PAGE 50

39 .5 .25 0 0.25 0.5 0 1 0 1 2 3 4 5 Cross shore (dimensionless)Alongshore (dimensionless) v = 0.4a)Measure of mean vorticity in the system .5 .25 0 0.25 0.5 0 1 0 1 2 3 4 5 Cross shore (dimensionless)Alongshore (dimensionless) v = 0.5b) .5 .25 0 0.25 0.5 0 1 0 1 2 3 4 5 Cross shore (dimensionless)Alongshore (dimensionless) v = 0.6c) .5 .25 0 0.25 0.5 0 1 0 1 2 3 4 5 Cross shore (dimensionless)Alongshore (dimensionless) v = 0.7d) Figure 3-12. Mean vorticity maps for a) 4.0 v, b) 5.0 v, c) 6.0 v and d) 7.0v Figures 3-11 and 3-12 show mean vorticity maps for increasing values of the background longshore current, with increments of 0.1 dimensionless current from no current up to for which the offshore current becomes very small. The vorticity maps for show no mixing between vortices of opposite signs with the jet getting 7.0v3.0 v

PAGE 51

40 pushed downstream thus narrowing farther offshore and increasing the peak velocities in the jet farther offshore (see figure 3-9). For stronger background longshore currents mixing between oppositely signed vortices starts to occur, as the upstream vortices are pushed into the downstream source of vortices. Some of these point vortices go right through the source point and might change their trajectory radically, resulting in some very small mean values of vorticity ( 3.0v 01.0 dimensionless units) away from the actual jet. When the longshore current becomes very strong the mechanism with which the vortex pairs get advected offshore weakens and the longshore current becomes dominant in the system. Jet angle evolution with increasing background longshore current Since the jet gets displaced downstream with the background longshore current, in order to obtain a representative angle of the jet the angle of the velocities within the jet was averaged with time. The angle was measured relative to the shore-normal, therefore for no longshore background current the angle should be close to 0 degrees. As before the jet was defined by the one-third highest offshore velocities for each alongshore velocity profile. To be consistent, the velocity profile at the cross-shore location 5.0 x was used for the angle calculations. Figure 3-13 shows the evolution of the jet angle with increasing background longshore current strength. The jet angle increases almost linearly with the current. Offshore velocities and background longshore current scale the same way so if the longshore current had no effect on the jet an angle of about 45 degrees should be expected for a background longshore current of 1. However, the plot shows how the angle reaches 80 degrees for that value of v, indicating a strong effect of the background

PAGE 52

41 longshore current on the strength of the offshore velocities, thus turning the jet in the alongshore direction. 0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 vbackground (dimensionless)Angle with respect to the shorenormal (degrees) Figure 3-13. Jet angle vs. background longshore current Unsteady Forcing As described in chapter 2, the forcing in the model, fixed at value 1 for steady forcing, can be modulated using a harmonic representation with a group amplitude and frequency (see equation 2-3). In the next section, an analysis of the relative importance of these parameters used to define the unsteady forcing will be conducted. Figure 3-10 shows good convergence for the model with three different resolutions or (large time step). Since unsteady forcing is obviously more unstable than steady forcing, it was decided to use longer model runs with a number of dimensionless time units of 100 with the less computational demanding t t of 0.05 and This leads to 50N

PAGE 53

42 a total number of large time steps of 2000 and a total computational time of about 10 hours for each run. A compromise between computational time and widest range of parameters needed to be achieved so a smaller number of background longshore currents were used. Table 3-1. Unsteady forcing simulations. Definition parameters. 05.0 t and # of 50N 2000t Group amp. (a) Group freq. () v background (Dimensionless) (Dimensionless) (Dimensionless) 0 0, 0.1, 0.2, 0.9, 1 0.5 0, 0.25, 0.50, 0.75, 1 1 0, 0.25, 0.50, 0.75, 1 1.5 0, 0.25, 0.50, 0.75, 1 2 0, 0.25, 0.50, 0.75, 1 0.25 2.5 0, 0.25, 0.50, 0.75, 1 0.5 0, 0.25, 0.50, 0.75, 1 1 0, 0.25, 0.50, 0.75, 1 1.5 0, 0.25, 0.50, 0.75, 1 2 0, 0.25, 0.50, 0.75, 1 0.5 2.5 0, 0.25, 0.50, 0.75, 1 0.5 0, 0.25, 0.50, 0.75, 1 1 0, 0.25, 0.50, 0.75, 1 1.5 0, 0.25, 0.50, 0.75, 1 2 0, 0.25, 0.50, 0.75, 1 0.75 2.5 0, 0.25, 0.50, 0.75, 1 0.5 0, 0.25, 0.50, 0.75, 1 1 0, 0.25, 0.50, 0.75, 1 1.5 0, 0.25, 0.50, 0.75, 1 2 0, 0.25, 0.50, 0.75, 1 1 2.5 0, 0.25, 0.50, 0.75, 1 Table 3-1 shows all the different runs that were used in the analysis. Four different amplitudes, with five frequencies each were used with five different background longshore current strengths ranging from 0 to 1. Also a base case with no groupiness was used for comparison reasons. Results for this case compared well with the ones used in the steady forcing section (smaller number of time steps and N=100).

PAGE 54

43 0 0 2 4 y/Rt = 5a) steady 0 0 2 4 y/Rt = 10 0 0 2 4 y/Rt = 15 0 0 2 4 y/Rt = 20 0 0 2 4 x/Ry/Rt = 25 0 0 2 4 x/Ry/Rt = 30 0 0 2 4 y/Rt = 5b) unsteady 0 0 2 4 y/Rt = 10 0 0 2 4 y/Rt = 15 0 0 2 4 y/Rt = 20 0 0 2 4 x/Ry/Rt = 25 0 0 2 4 x/Ry/Rt = 30 Figure 3-14. Comparison of the simulations for steady and unsteady forcing with a background longshore current of 25.0 v Unsteady forcing with amplitude and frequency 1a 1 Figure 3-14 shows a comparison of the simulations for steady and unsteady forcing with the same background longshore current. The amplitude for the unsteady case is equal to 1, so this is the limiting case where the forcing strength changes with time from strength 0 to 2. The figure shows a much wider spreading of the jet and higher interactions between oppositely signed vortices. This would suggest smaller offshore velocities in the jet since these interactions would cancel their effects, however the strength of the vortices gets up to double during one group period, so both effects may counteract each other. We will try to address this here. Also, it is noticeable how the direction of the jet changes with time as the relative strength of the forcing to the background longshore current changes. This effect resembles a hose being swung back

PAGE 55

44 and forth and becomes more evident with increasing background longshore currents and group amplitudes. Since the behavior of the rip current is very unsteady with time the analysis will be conducted using mean quantities (averaged over an integer number of wave periods). As with the steady forcing cases, mean velocity fields within the area of the rip neck and mean vorticity maps were obtained using a series of matlab routines. Comparison with the base case (no groupiness) will be used when possible. Velocities in the rip neck For comparison reasons, velocities at the alongshore profile at will be used. The two basic parameters that define the unsteady forcing are the amplitude and the group frequency. The data will be grouped together to study the effects of these parameters separately. 5.0x Figure 3-15 shows the mean peak offshore velocities in the rip neck at the cross-shore location The different colored lines on each plot represent all the frequencies. As could be expected, the smaller amplitudes compare better with the steady case (black line), with the larger amplitudes separating from it. In general, the velocities are smaller than in the steady case for smaller background longshore current strengths, and larger for larger background longshore current strengths, resulting in a change of shape of the steady case plot. Basically this indicates that higher amplitudes have smaller responses to higher background longshore current strengths, therefore the periods in the forcing where the intensity of the vortices is above 1 seem to dominate over the periods where it is smaller than 1. 5.0x

PAGE 56

45 0 0.25 0.5 0.75 1 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2 a) amplitude = 0.25mean peak u (dimensionless) 0 0.25 0.5 0.75 1 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2 b) amplitude = 0.5mean peak u (dimensionless) 0 0.25 0.5 0.75 1 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2 c) amplitude = 0.75v (dimensionless)mean peak u (dimensionless) 0 0.25 0.5 0.75 1 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2 d) amplitude = 1v (dimensionless)mean peak u (dimensionless) Figure 3-15. Mean peak offshore velocities in the jet at the cross-shore location 5.0 x for different amplitudes. (-) Steady forcing, (-o-) 5.0 (-o-) 1 (-o-) 5.1 (-o-) 2 and (-o-) 5.2 Figure 3-15 shows some spreading on the lines on each plot, which correspond to the different frequencies. In order to study the effect of these, the mean peak offshore velocities in the rip neck at the cross-shore location 5.0 x are plotted on figure 3-16 for each frequency. The different colored lines on each plot represent the different amplitudes. The differences between the base case and the unsteady results are smaller for the higher frequencies with higher responses for the smaller frequencies. This behavior agrees with the results presented by Kennedy (2003), where it was determined that for dimensionless frequencies greater than 1 the response decreases very quickly.

PAGE 57

46 0 0.25 0.5 0.75 1 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2 a) frequency = 0.50mean peak u (dimensionless) 0 0.25 0.5 0.75 1 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2 b) frequency = 1.00mean peak u (dimensionless) 0 0.25 0.5 0.75 1 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2 c) frequency = 1.50v (dimensionless)mean peak u (dimensionless) 0 0.25 0.5 0.75 1 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2 d) frequency = 2.00v (dimensionless)mean peak u (dimensionless) Figure 3-16. Mean peak offshore velocities in the jet at the cross-shore location 5.0 x for different frequencies. (-) Steady forcing, (-o-) 25.0 a, (-o-) (-o-) (-o-) 5.0 a 75.0a 1 a Vorticity Mean vorticity maps were obtained for each one of the unsteady cases with the same resolution (boxes of 0.25 by 0.25 dimensionless units). In general, the area of influence of the jet, or the areas with presence of vortices widens with increasing amplitude. As a representative case, the vorticity maps for the case of amplitude 1 and frequency 1 are shown on figure 3-17. This is the consequence of having vortices strength changing from 0 to 2 over a group period resulting on the behavior described before as a hose being swung back and forth.

PAGE 58

47 .5 .25 0 0.25 0.5 0 1 0 1 2 3 4 5 Cross shore (dimensionless)Alongshore (dimensionless) v = 0a)Measure of mean vorticity in the system .5 .25 0 0.25 0.5 0 1 0 1 2 3 4 5 Cross shore (dimensionless)Alongshore (dimensionless) v = 0.25b) .5 .25 0 0.25 0.5 0 1 0 1 2 3 4 5 Cross shore (dimensionless)Alongshore (dimensionless) v = 0.5c) .5 .25 0 0.25 0.5 0 1 0 1 2 3 4 5 Cross shore (dimensionless)Alongshore (dimensionless) v = 0.75d) Figure 3-17. Mean vorticity maps for the unsteady case of amplitude 1 and frequency 1. a)v, b), c) 0 25.0v 5.0 v and d) 75.0 v In order to being able to compare the relative importance of each parameter, it is necessary, once again, to represent as many cases together as possible in plots sorted by the different values of the parameter under study. In order to do that, alongshore vorticity

PAGE 59

48 profiles were calculated and the one at the cross-shore location was chosen to be consistent with the velocity analysis. The zero vorticity crossing is a good indicator of the location of the center of the jet and was obtained for each case. Also it was determined the alongshore location of the .1 and +0.1 vorticity values as an indicator of the width of the jet, although this value might be high for the largest background longshore currents were offshore velocities, and therefore mean vorticity values, are small (see appendix B). 5.0x On figure 3-18, the alongshore location of the (-0.1, 0, 0.1) values of the vorticity (error bars) are plotted against the background longshore currents for different values of the amplitude. The different lines on each plot represent all the frequency values. Observing figure 3-18, it appears that the frequency has very little influence on the location of the jet since all the different lines are very close together except for the amplitude 1 case (figure 3-18d) and larger background longshore current, however the location of the zero crossing becomes noisier as the longshore current increases. It is noticeable how the width of the jet increases with increasing amplitude (larger error bars), also the location of the positive crossing (downstream of the background longshore current) is generally closer to the zero crossing, indicating that the vorticity gradient is larger in the downstream side of the jet, thus inducing larger velocities on that side of the jet (as can be seen on the mean velocity profile on figure 3-8). Similarly, figure 3-19 shows the alongshore location of the (-0.1, 0, 0.1) values of the vorticity plotted against the background longshore currents but for different values of the frequency. The different lines on each plot represent all the amplitude values.

PAGE 60

49 0 0.25 0.5 0.75 1 .5 0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 a) amplitude = 0.25y (dimensionless) 0 0.25 0.5 0.75 1 .5 0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 b) amplitude = 0.50y (dimensionless) 0 0.25 0.5 0.75 1 .5 0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 c) amplitude = 0.75v (dimensionless)y (dimensionless) 0 0.25 0.5 0.75 1 .5 0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 d) amplitude = 1v (dimensionless)y (dimensionless) Figure 3-18. Alongshore location of the (-0.1, 0, 0.1) values of the vorticity at 5.0 x5.0 with increasing longshore current for each amplitude. (-x-) (-x-) 1 (-x-) 5.1 (-x-) 2 and (-x-) 5.2 From figure 3-19 it can be inferred that the location of the zero vorticity crossing (location of the jet) for the larger longshore current strengths has a dependence on the group amplitude, with the jet being pushed farther downstream for the lower amplitudes. This reinforces the fact that the periods during which the forcing is higher than 1 dominate over the ones where it is smaller than 1, as concluded for the offshore velocity profiles. Although the frequency has a smaller influence on the location of the jet, the cases for higher frequencies on figure 3-19 show less separation from the steady forcing case.

PAGE 61

50 0 0.25 0.5 0.75 1 .5 0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 a) frequency = 0.5y (dimensionless) 0 0.25 0.5 0.75 1 .5 0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 b) frequency = 1y (dimensionless) 0 0.25 0.5 0.75 1 .5 0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 c) frequency = 1.5v (dimensionless)y (dimensionless) 0 0.25 0.5 0.75 1 .5 0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 d) frequency = 2v (dimensionless)y (dimensionless) Figure 3-19. Alongshore location of the (-0.1, 0, 0.1) values of the vorticity at 5.0 x with increasing longshore current for each frequency. (-x-) Steady forcing, (-x-) a, (-x-) 25.0 5.0 a, (-x-) 75.0 a and (-x-) Figure 3-20 shows the mean location and width of the jet as defined before but plotted against increasing group amplitudes. It shows that for larger values of the amplitude and the background longshore current the jet is not pushed downstream as much, as stated before, and that for the smaller longshore currents the amplitude has no influence. The background longshore current is the predominant factor on the location of the jet.

PAGE 62

51 0 0.25 0.5 0.75 1 .5 0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 a) frequency = 0.5y (dimensionless) 0 0.25 0.5 0.75 1 .5 0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 b) frequency = 1y (dimensionless) 0 0.25 0.5 0.75 1 .5 0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 c) frequency = 1.5a (dimensionless)y (dimensionless) 0 0.25 0.5 0.75 1 .5 0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 d) frequency = 2a (dimensionless)y (dimensionless) Figure 3-20. Alongshore location of the (-0.1, 0, 0.1) values of the vorticity at 5.0 x0 with increasing group amplitude for each frequency. (-x-) v, (-x-) (-x-) 25.0v 5.0 v, (-x-) 75.0 v and (-x-) 1 v Figure 3-21 shows that frequency has almost no influence on the location of the jet. For the higher values of the frequency and amplitude some of the zero crossing are missing in the figure, this is due to the fact that along the alongshore profile at the cross-shore location the vorticity is always negative and never becomes positive. This indicates that the jet is parallel to the shoreline. Figure 3-22 shows one of these cases where the jet, defined by the oppositely signed vorticity on either side is completely parallel to the shore. 5.0x

PAGE 63

52 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 .5 0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 a) amplitude = 0.25y (dimensionless) 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 .5 0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 b) amplitude = 0.5y (dimensionless) 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 .5 0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 c) amplitude = 0.75f (dimensionless)y (dimensionless) 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 .5 0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 d) amplitude = 1f (dimensionless)y (dimensionless) Figure 3-21. Alongshore location of the (-0.1, 0, 0.1) values of the vorticity at 5.0 x0 with increasing group frequency for each amplitude. (-x-) v, (-x-) (-x-) 25.0v 5.0 v, (-x-) 75.0 v and (-x-) 1 v Although it seems like for these cases cross-shore velocities in the jet should be almost zero, this does not agree completely with the results obtained with the velocity profiles where a small residual offshore current remains for the same cases. However, the mean peak offshore velocities calculated at the cross-shore location have a peak in the rip neck area before the jet is turned parallel to the shore while going around the downstream fixed source of vorticity (see figure 3-22). 5.0x

PAGE 64

53 .5 .25 0 0.25 0.5 0 1 0 1 2 3 4 5 Cross shore coord. (dimensionless)Alongshore coord. (dimensionless)Measure of mean vorticity in the systemaveraged over 14 group periods v = 0.75 Figure 3-22. Mean vorticity map for the unsteady forcing case with: a, 1 5.1 and 75.0v

PAGE 65

CHAPTER 4 SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS A simplified conceptual representation of a rip current system was used to study the effects of longshore currents on rip currents. Rip currents are part of a very complex circulation system within the near shore, where many different processes interact with each other. By focusing on the rip neck area, where generation of circulation and vorticity was assumed to be the main physical process, a simplified representation of a rip current was achieved. The numerical model used for this study (discussed in detail in chapter 2), first introduced by Kennedy (2003), is based on a generation of vorticity approach, where oppositely signed vortices are continuously released on either side of the rip channel and let free in the system. Flat bed and essentially no energy dissipation (no bottom friction, no wave-current interaction) are assumed in the model. Since generation of vorticity is the only physical process represented in the model, its applicability is strictly limited to the rip neck area, where this process is assumed to be dominant. A constant background longshore current was added to the model to study its effects on the generated jet-like rip current. Both steady and unsteady forcing were used. A wide range of unsteady forcing parameters were used in conjunction with a number of increasing background longshore current strengths. There are three parameters that define the model. A mean rate of generation of circulation which depends mainly in the strength of wave breaking and the local topography DtD the semi-gap width of the rip channel and the constant R 54

PAGE 66

55 background longshore current v Scaling of the different processes is very straightforward. Velocities in the rip neck depend on the strength of wave breaking, scaling with 21DtD but not on the gap width R Temporal response will depend both on wave breaking strength and length scales D 21DtR The model was tested against measured laboratory data in the first section of chapter 3. Two datasets were available, both from experiments conducted at the Center for Applied Coastal Research of the University of Delaware. The experimental setup consisted of a fixed topography of a barred beach with rip channels. In order to scale measured velocities in the experiments, estimates of the scaling parameter DtD where obtained using two different methodologies proposed by Brocchini et al. (2003). The first methodology, based on breaking assumptions over the bar uses offshore wave data and water depth at the bar crest as inputs. The second methodology uses local measured wave heights and setups. It was found that the first methodology over estimates the generation of circulation by a factor of two as compared to the second methodology (see figure 3-5), which was believed to be more accurate since it uses local measured data. On the other hand, the first methodology could easily be applied to field data since offshore wave measurements and water depth at the bar crest are easy to obtain, whereas obtaining local setup measurements is very complicated. The model predicted quite well the trend of the data, although it seemed to over predict velocities in the rip neck. This was attributed to the difficulty in determining the relative cross-shore location of the measuring points with respect to the generation of vorticity in the surf zone. Also, the estimations of the mean rate of generation of circulation are probably high since the methodologies applied consider the maximum

PAGE 67

56 possible generation of circulation (ignoring any breaking in the channel). Ignored physical processes like wave-current interaction, 3D effects or bottom friction are probably not negligible. This could be adjusted with a parameter to decrease predicted velocities. In the second section of chapter 3, the model was used to study the effects of longshore currents on rip currents, using both steady and unsteady forcing. Velocity fields and mean vorticity maps within the rip channel area were used in the analysis. The introduction of a background longshore current in the systems was found to have dramatic effects on the rip current behavior (see figures 3-10). The mean peak offshore velocities within the jet are approximately constant for small background dimensionless longshore currents but decrease quickly once the relative strength of the longshore current becomes stronger 3.0v 3.0v This was found to be due to the mixing of oppositely signed vortices from either side of the rip once the current became strong enough to push the upstream vortices into the downstream vortices, canceling their effects. This can be observed in figures 3-11 and 3-12. The angle of the jet was estimated using the direction of the velocities with the 1/3 highest offshore component of velocity at the dimensionless location The jet angle, relative to the shore normal, became almost 80 degrees for dimensionless longshore current strengths of 1, but would be expected to be around 45 degrees (figure 3-13) since offshore velocities and background longshore current scale the same way. This is another indicator of the strong effect of the longshore current on the rip current. 5.0x A wide range of values was used to test the relative importance of the parameters defining the unsteady forcing (amplitude and frequency) with increasing background

PAGE 68

57 longshore current strengths. Unsteady forcing resulted in a very unsteady behavior of the rip current or jet (see figure 3-14), thus only mean quantities could be studied. Mean peak offshore velocities in the jet were found to be mainly dependent on the strength of the background longshore current (see figures 3-15 and 3-16). Higher amplitudes (of unsteady forcing) were found to have smaller responses to higher background longshore current strengths, therefore the periods in the forcing where the intensity of the vortices is above 1 seem to dominate over the periods where it is smaller than 1. For dimensionless frequencies greater than 1 the response was very small. This agrees with the results presented by Kennedy (2003). The alongshore location of the jet along a mean vorticity profile at 5.0 x was determined by the zero vorticity crossing and estimations of the jet width were obtained by the locations of .1 and 0.1 mean vorticity values. The location of the jet was found to be mainly dependent on the strength of the background longshore current. Higher values of the group amplitude resulted in a smaller displacement of the jet downstream (figure 3-20), supporting the argument that the periods during which the forcing is higher than 1 dominate over the ones where it is smaller than 1. The frequency was found to have almost no influence on the jet location (figure 3-21). The jet narrows for stronger background currents as the flow is confined closer to the downstream source of vorticity. Higher amplitudes induce wider mean jet widths (figure 3-20) although its influence is very small compared to the background longshore current. Despite the high simplicity of the model, it has proven to obtain very reasonable results in comparison with measured data from laboratory experiments. The main challenge to apply the results of the model in the field is the estimation of the model

PAGE 69

58 parameter DtD ; however if the model were used as a predictive tool the methodologies used in this thesis would give predictions on the safe side. For future research, the model results could be coupled with existing rip current forecasting indexes as a predictive tool. Further comparison with laboratory and field data would be desired, especially with longshore current data.

PAGE 70

APPENDIX A MEAN VORTICITY MAPS Cross shore (dimensionless)Alongshore (dimensionless) v = 0a)Measure of mean vorticity in the system .5 .25 0 0.25 0.5 0 1 0 1 2 3 4 5 Cross shore (dimensionless)Alongshore (dimensionless) v = 0.25b) .5 .25 0 0.25 0.5 0 1 0 1 2 3 4 5 Cross shore (dimensionless)Alongshore (dimensionless) v = 0.5c) .5 .25 0 0.25 0.5 0 1 0 1 2 3 4 5 Cross shore (dimensionless)Alongshore (dimensionless) v = 0.75d) .5 .25 0 0.25 0.5 0 1 0 1 2 3 4 5 Figure A-1. Mean vorticity map for steady forcing. a) 0 v b) 25.0 v c) and d) 5.0v 75.0v 59

PAGE 71

60 .5 .25 0 0.25 0.5 0 1 0 1 2 3 4 5 Cross shore (dimensionless)Alongshore (dimensionless) v = 0a)Measure of mean vorticity in the system .5 .25 0 0.25 0.5 0 1 0 1 2 3 4 5 Cross shore (dimensionless)Alongshore (dimensionless) v = 0.25b) .5 .25 0 0.25 0.5 0 1 0 1 2 3 4 5 Cross shore (dimensionless)Alongshore (dimensionless) v = 0.5c) .5 .25 0 0.25 0.5 0 1 0 1 2 3 4 5 Cross shore (dimensionless)Alongshore (dimensionless) v = 0.75d) Figure A-2. Mean vorticity maps for unsteady forcing with amplitude 0.25 and frequency 0.5. a)v, b) 0 25.0 v c) 5.0 v and d) 75.0 v

PAGE 72

61 .5 .25 0 0.25 0.5 0 1 0 1 2 3 4 5 Cross shore (dimensionless)Alongshore (dimensionless) v = 0a)Measure of mean vorticity in the system .5 .25 0 0.25 0.5 0 1 0 1 2 3 4 5 Cross shore (dimensionless)Alongshore (dimensionless) v = 0.25b) .5 .25 0 0.25 0.5 0 1 0 1 2 3 4 5 Cross shore (dimensionless)Alongshore (dimensionless) v = 0.5c) .5 .25 0 0.25 0.5 0 1 0 1 2 3 4 5 Cross shore (dimensionless)Alongshore (dimensionless) v = 0.75d) Figure A-3. Mean vorticity maps for unsteady forcing with amplitude 0.25 and frequency 1. a)v, b), c) 0 25.0v 5.0 v and d) 75.0 v

PAGE 73

62 .5 .25 0 0.25 0.5 0 1 0 1 2 3 4 5 Cross shore (dimensionless)Alongshore (dimensionless) v = 0a)Measure of mean vorticity in the system .5 .25 0 0.25 0.5 0 1 0 1 2 3 4 5 Cross shore (dimensionless)Alongshore (dimensionless) v = 0.25b) .5 .25 0 0.25 0.5 0 1 0 1 2 3 4 5 Cross shore (dimensionless)Alongshore (dimensionless) v = 0.5c) .5 .25 0 0.25 0.5 0 1 0 1 2 3 4 5 Cross shore (dimensionless)Alongshore (dimensionless) v = 0.75d) Figure A-4. Mean vorticity maps for unsteady forcing with amplitude 0.25 and frequency 1.5. a)v, b) 0 25.0 v c) 5.0 v and d) 75.0 v

PAGE 74

63 .5 .25 0 0.25 0.5 0 1 0 1 2 3 4 5 Cross shore (dimensionless)Alongshore (dimensionless) v = 0a)Measure of mean vorticity in the system .5 .25 0 0.25 0.5 0 1 0 1 2 3 4 5 Cross shore (dimensionless)Alongshore (dimensionless) v = 0.25b) .5 .25 0 0.25 0.5 0 1 0 1 2 3 4 5 Cross shore (dimensionless)Alongshore (dimensionless) v = 0.5c) .5 .25 0 0.25 0.5 0 1 0 1 2 3 4 5 Cross shore (dimensionless)Alongshore (dimensionless) v = 0.75d) Figure A-5. Mean vorticity maps for unsteady forcing with amplitude 0.25 and frequency 2. a)v, b), c) 0 25.0v 5.0 v and d) 75.0 v

PAGE 75

64 .5 .25 0 0.25 0.5 0 1 0 1 2 3 4 5 Cross shore (dimensionless)Alongshore (dimensionless) v = 0a)Measure of mean vorticity in the system .5 .25 0 0.25 0.5 0 1 0 1 2 3 4 5 Cross shore (dimensionless)Alongshore (dimensionless) v = 0.25b) .5 .25 0 0.25 0.5 0 1 0 1 2 3 4 5 Cross shore (dimensionless)Alongshore (dimensionless) v = 0.5c) .5 .25 0 0.25 0.5 0 1 0 1 2 3 4 5 Cross shore (dimensionless)Alongshore (dimensionless) v = 0.75d) Figure A-6. Mean vorticity maps for unsteady forcing with amplitude 0.25 and frequency 2.5. a)v, b) 0 25.0 v c) 5.0 v and d) 75.0 v

PAGE 76

65 .5 .25 0 0.25 0.5 0 1 0 1 2 3 4 5 Cross shore (dimensionless)Alongshore (dimensionless) v = 0a)Measure of mean vorticity in the system .5 .25 0 0.25 0.5 0 1 0 1 2 3 4 5 Cross shore (dimensionless)Alongshore (dimensionless) v = 0.25b) .5 .25 0 0.25 0.5 0 1 0 1 2 3 4 5 Cross shore (dimensionless)Alongshore (dimensionless) v = 0.5c) .5 .25 0 0.25 0.5 0 1 0 1 2 3 4 5 Cross shore (dimensionless)Alongshore (dimensionless) v = 0.75d) Figure A-7. Mean vorticity maps for unsteady forcing with amplitude 0.50 and frequency 0.5. a)v, b) 0 25.0 v c) 5.0 v and d) 75.0 v

PAGE 77

66 .5 .25 0 0.25 0.5 0 1 0 1 2 3 4 5 Cross shore (dimensionless)Alongshore (dimensionless) v = 0a)Measure of mean vorticity in the system .5 .25 0 0.25 0.5 0 1 0 1 2 3 4 5 Cross shore (dimensionless)Alongshore (dimensionless) v = 0.25b) .5 .25 0 0.25 0.5 0 1 0 1 2 3 4 5 Cross shore (dimensionless)Alongshore (dimensionless) v = 0.5c) .5 .25 0 0.25 0.5 0 1 0 1 2 3 4 5 Cross shore (dimensionless)Alongshore (dimensionless) v = 0.75d) Figure A-8. Mean vorticity maps for unsteady forcing with amplitude 0.50 and frequency 1. a)v, b), c) 0 25.0v 5.0 v and d) 75.0 v

PAGE 78

67 .5 .25 0 0.25 0.5 0 1 0 1 2 3 4 5 Cross shore (dimensionless)Alongshore (dimensionless) v = 0a)Measure of mean vorticity in the system .5 .25 0 0.25 0.5 0 1 0 1 2 3 4 5 Cross shore (dimensionless)Alongshore (dimensionless) v = 0.25b) .5 .25 0 0.25 0.5 0 1 0 1 2 3 4 5 Cross shore (dimensionless)Alongshore (dimensionless) v = 0.5c) .5 .25 0 0.25 0.5 0 1 0 1 2 3 4 5 Cross shore (dimensionless)Alongshore (dimensionless) v = 0.75d) Figure A-9. Mean vorticity maps for unsteady forcing with amplitude 0.50 and frequency 1.5. a)v, b) 0 25.0 v c) 5.0 v and d) 75.0 v

PAGE 79

68 .5 .25 0 0.25 0.5 0 1 0 1 2 3 4 5 Cross shore (dimensionless)Alongshore (dimensionless) v = 0a)Measure of mean vorticity in the system .5 .25 0 0.25 0.5 0 1 0 1 2 3 4 5 Cross shore (dimensionless)Alongshore (dimensionless) v = 0.25b) .5 .25 0 0.25 0.5 0 1 0 1 2 3 4 5 Cross shore (dimensionless)Alongshore (dimensionless) v = 0.5c) .5 .25 0 0.25 0.5 0 1 0 1 2 3 4 5 Cross shore (dimensionless)Alongshore (dimensionless) v = 0.75d) Figure A-10. Mean vorticity maps for unsteady forcing with amplitude 0.50 and frequency 2. a)v, b) 0 25.0 v c) 5.0 v and d) 75.0 v

PAGE 80

69 .5 .25 0 0.25 0.5 0 1 0 1 2 3 4 5 Cross shore (dimensionless)Alongshore (dimensionless) v = 0a)Measure of mean vorticity in the system .5 .25 0 0.25 0.5 0 1 0 1 2 3 4 5 Cross shore (dimensionless)Alongshore (dimensionless) v = 0.25b) .5 .25 0 0.25 0.5 0 1 0 1 2 3 4 5 Cross shore (dimensionless)Alongshore (dimensionless) v = 0.5c) .5 .25 0 0.25 0.5 0 1 0 1 2 3 4 5 Cross shore (dimensionless)Alongshore (dimensionless) v = 0.75d) Figure A-11. Mean vorticity maps for unsteady forcing with amplitude 0.50 and frequency 2.5. a) 0 v, b) 25.0 v c) 5.0 v and d) 75.0 v

PAGE 81

70 .5 .25 0 0.25 0.5 0 1 0 1 2 3 4 5 Cross shore (dimensionless)Alongshore (dimensionless) v = 0a)Measure of mean vorticity in the system .5 .25 0 0.25 0.5 0 1 0 1 2 3 4 5 Cross shore (dimensionless)Alongshore (dimensionless) v = 0.25b) .5 .25 0 0.25 0.5 0 1 0 1 2 3 4 5 Cross shore (dimensionless)Alongshore (dimensionless) v = 0.5c) .5 .25 0 0.25 0.5 0 1 0 1 2 3 4 5 Cross shore (dimensionless)Alongshore (dimensionless) v = 0.75d) Figure A-12. Mean vorticity maps for unsteady forcing with amplitude 0.75 and frequency 0.5. a) 0 v, b) 25.0 v c) 5.0 v and d) 75.0 v

PAGE 82

71 .5 .25 0 0.25 0.5 0 1 0 1 2 3 4 5 Cross shore (dimensionless)Alongshore (dimensionless) v = 0a)Measure of mean vorticity in the system .5 .25 0 0.25 0.5 0 1 0 1 2 3 4 5 Cross shore (dimensionless)Alongshore (dimensionless) v = 0.25b) .5 .25 0 0.25 0.5 0 1 0 1 2 3 4 5 Cross shore (dimensionless)Alongshore (dimensionless) v = 0.5c) .5 .25 0 0.25 0.5 0 1 0 1 2 3 4 5 Cross shore (dimensionless)Alongshore (dimensionless) v = 0.75d) Figure A-13. Mean vorticity maps for unsteady forcing with amplitude 0.75 and frequency 1. a)v, b) 0 25.0 v c) 5.0 v and d) 75.0 v

PAGE 83

72 .5 .25 0 0.25 0.5 0 1 0 1 2 3 4 5 Cross shore (dimensionless)Alongshore (dimensionless) v = 0a)Measure of mean vorticity in the system .5 .25 0 0.25 0.5 0 1 0 1 2 3 4 5 Cross shore (dimensionless)Alongshore (dimensionless) v = 0.25b) .5 .25 0 0.25 0.5 0 1 0 1 2 3 4 5 Cross shore (dimensionless)Alongshore (dimensionless) v = 0.5c) .5 .25 0 0.25 0.5 0 1 0 1 2 3 4 5 Cross shore (dimensionless)Alongshore (dimensionless) v = 0.75d) Figure A-14. Mean vorticity maps for unsteady forcing with amplitude 0.75 and frequency 1.5. a) 0 v, b) 25.0 v c) 5.0 v and d) 75.0 v

PAGE 84

73 .5 .25 0 0.25 0.5 0 1 0 1 2 3 4 5 Cross shore (dimensionless)Alongshore (dimensionless) v = 0a)Measure of mean vorticity in the system .5 .25 0 0.25 0.5 0 1 0 1 2 3 4 5 Cross shore (dimensionless)Alongshore (dimensionless) v = 0.25b) .5 .25 0 0.25 0.5 0 1 0 1 2 3 4 5 Cross shore (dimensionless)Alongshore (dimensionless) v = 0.5c) .5 .25 0 0.25 0.5 0 1 0 1 2 3 4 5 Cross shore (dimensionless)Alongshore (dimensionless) v = 0.75d) Figure A-15. Mean vorticity maps for unsteady forcing with amplitude 0.75 and frequency 2. a)v, b) 0 25.0 v c) 5.0 v and d) 75.0 v

PAGE 85

74 .5 .25 0 0.25 0.5 0 1 0 1 2 3 4 5 Cross shore (dimensionless)Alongshore (dimensionless) v = 0a)Measure of mean vorticity in the system .5 .25 0 0.25 0.5 0 1 0 1 2 3 4 5 Cross shore (dimensionless)Alongshore (dimensionless) v = 0.25b) .5 .25 0 0.25 0.5 0 1 0 1 2 3 4 5 Cross shore (dimensionless)Alongshore (dimensionless) v = 0.5c) .5 .25 0 0.25 0.5 0 1 0 1 2 3 4 5 Cross shore (dimensionless)Alongshore (dimensionless) v = 0.75d) Figure A-16. Mean vorticity maps for unsteady forcing with amplitude 0.75 and frequency 2.5. a) 0 v, b) 25.0 v c) 5.0 v and d) 75.0 v

PAGE 86

75 .5 .25 0 0.25 0.5 0 1 0 1 2 3 4 5 Cross shore (dimensionless)Alongshore (dimensionless) v = 0a)Measure of mean vorticity in the system .5 .25 0 0.25 0.5 0 1 0 1 2 3 4 5 Cross shore (dimensionless)Alongshore (dimensionless) v = 0.25b) .5 .25 0 0.25 0.5 0 1 0 1 2 3 4 5 Cross shore (dimensionless)Alongshore (dimensionless) v = 0.5c) .5 .25 0 0.25 0.5 0 1 0 1 2 3 4 5 Cross shore (dimensionless)Alongshore (dimensionless) v = 0.75d) Figure A-17. Mean vorticity maps for unsteady forcing with amplitude 1 and frequency 0.5. a)v, b) 0 25.0 v c) 5.0 v and d) 75.0 v

PAGE 87

76 .5 .25 0 0.25 0.5 0 1 0 1 2 3 4 5 Cross shore (dimensionless)Alongshore (dimensionless) v = 0a)Measure of mean vorticity in the system .5 .25 0 0.25 0.5 0 1 0 1 2 3 4 5 Cross shore (dimensionless)Alongshore (dimensionless) v = 0.25b) .5 .25 0 0.25 0.5 0 1 0 1 2 3 4 5 Cross shore (dimensionless)Alongshore (dimensionless) v = 0.5c) .5 .25 0 0.25 0.5 0 1 0 1 2 3 4 5 Cross shore (dimensionless)Alongshore (dimensionless) v = 0.75d) Figure A-18. Mean vorticity maps for unsteady forcing with amplitude 1 and frequency 1. a)v, b), c) 0 25.0v 5.0 v and d) 75.0 v

PAGE 88

77 .5 .25 0 0.25 0.5 0 1 0 1 2 3 4 5 Cross shore (dimensionless)Alongshore (dimensionless) v = 0a)Measure of mean vorticity in the system .5 .25 0 0.25 0.5 0 1 0 1 2 3 4 5 Cross shore (dimensionless)Alongshore (dimensionless) v = 0.25b) .5 .25 0 0.25 0.5 0 1 0 1 2 3 4 5 Cross shore (dimensionless)Alongshore (dimensionless) v = 0.5c) .5 .25 0 0.25 0.5 0 1 0 1 2 3 4 5 Cross shore (dimensionless)Alongshore (dimensionless) v = 0.75d) Figure A-19. Mean vorticity maps for unsteady forcing with amplitude 1 and frequency 1.5. a)v, b) 0 25.0 v c) 5.0 v and d) 75.0 v

PAGE 89

78 .5 .25 0 0.25 0.5 0 1 0 1 2 3 4 5 Cross shore (dimensionless)Alongshore (dimensionless) v = 0a)Measure of mean vorticity in the system .5 .25 0 0.25 0.5 0 1 0 1 2 3 4 5 Cross shore (dimensionless)Alongshore (dimensionless) v = 0.25b) .5 .25 0 0.25 0.5 0 1 0 1 2 3 4 5 Cross shore (dimensionless)Alongshore (dimensionless) v = 0.5c) .5 .25 0 0.25 0.5 0 1 0 1 2 3 4 5 Cross shore (dimensionless)Alongshore (dimensionless) v = 0.75d) Figure A-20. Mean vorticity maps for unsteady forcing with amplitude 1 and frequency 2. a)v, b), c) 0 25.0v 5.0 v and d) 75.0 v

PAGE 90

79 .5 .25 0 0.25 0.5 0 1 0 1 2 3 4 5 Cross shore (dimensionless)Alongshore (dimensionless) v = 0a)Measure of mean vorticity in the system .5 .25 0 0.25 0.5 0 1 0 1 2 3 4 5 Cross shore (dimensionless)Alongshore (dimensionless) v = 0.25b) .5 .25 0 0.25 0.5 0 1 0 1 2 3 4 5 Cross shore (dimensionless)Alongshore (dimensionless) v = 0.5c) .5 .25 0 0.25 0.5 0 1 0 1 2 3 4 5 Cross shore (dimensionless)Alongshore (dimensionless) v = 0.75d) Figure A-21. Mean vorticity maps for unsteady forcing with amplitude 1 and frequency 2.5. a)v, b) 0 25.0 v c) 5.0 v and d) 75.0 v

PAGE 91

APPENDIX B LOCATION AND WIDTH OF THE JET DATA The following tables contain the alongshore locations of the vorticity values used in figures in chapter 3 to define location (zero vorticity crossing) and width ([-0.1,0.1] vorticity values) of the jet. All quantities are dimensionless and were obtained from the mean vorticity maps of each case (see Appendix A). Table B-1. Alongshore location and width of the jet for steady forcing No groupiness cases v yy0 y+ 0 -0.38 0 0.4 0.25 0.89 0.93 0.96 0.5 1.1 1.14 1.21 0.75 1.33 1.59 1 1.97 80

PAGE 92

81 Table B-2. Alongshore location and width of the jet for unsteady forcing with amplitude 0.25 f=0.5 f=1.0 v yy0 y+ yy0 y+ 0 -0.4 0 0.38 -0.4 0 0.35 0.25 0.88 0.92 0.96 0.91 0.97 1.01 0.5 1.03 1.06 1.1 1.03 1.08 1.13 0.75 1.31 1.37 1.52 1.23 1.36 1.44 1 1.86 1.83 f=1.5 f=2.0 v yy0 y+ yy0 y+ 0 -0.39 0 0.39 -0.38 0 0.39 0.25 0.89 0.94 0.98 0.89 0.94 0.97 0.5 1.03 1.07 1.11 1.02 1.06 1.1 0.75 1.27 1.34 1.45 1.29 1.36 1.47 1 1.7 1.68 f=2.5 v yy0 y+ 0 -0.4 0 0.36 0.25 0.9 0.95 1 0.5 1.05 1.09 1.13 0.75 1.3 1.36 1.5 1 1.67

PAGE 93

82 Table B-3. Alongshore location and width of the jet for unsteady forcing with amplitude 0.5 f=0.5 f=1.0 v yy0 y+ yy0 y+ 0 -0.36 0 0.4 -0.39 0 0.4 0.25 0.79 0.9 0.96 0.88 0.98 1.04 0.5 1 1.05 1.1 0.93 1.03 1.1 0.75 1.24 1.31 1.37 1.13 1.27 1.36 1 1.68 1.6 f=1.5 f=2.0 v yy0 y+ yy0 y+ 0 -0.39 0 0.37 -0.38 0 0.37 0.25 0.89 0.95 1 0.88 0.93 0.98 0.5 1.02 1.06 1.11 1.01 1.04 1.08 0.75 1.15 1.29 1.42 1.32 1.46 1 1.56 1.59 f=2.5 v yy0 y+ 0 -0.38 0 0.38 0.25 0.89 0.94 1 0.5 1.05 1.1 1.18 0.75 1.3 1.38 1.64 1 1.53

PAGE 94

83 Table B-4. Alongshore location and width of the jet for unsteady forcing with amplitude 0.75 f=0.5 f=1.0 v yy0 y+ yy0 y+ 0 -0.39 0 0.41 -0.4 0 0.39 0.25 0.6 0.82 0.91 0.8 0.94 1.02 0.5 0.92 1.03 1.08 0.92 1.03 1.11 0.75 1.11 1.24 1.33 1.04 1.2 1.34 1 1.56 1.4 f=1.5 f=2.0 v yy0 y+ yy0 y+ 0 -0.39 0 0.39 -0.39 0 0.38 0.25 0.86 0.93 0.99 0.87 0.93 0.99 0.5 1.04 1.09 1.14 1 1.04 1.08 0.75 1.22 1.35 1.35 1 1.4 1.68 f=2.5 v yy0 y+ 0 -0.39 0 0.38 0.25 0.84 0.92 0.99 0.5 1.08 1.12 1.23 0.75 1.29 1.37 1.63 1 1.56

PAGE 95

84 Table B-5. Alongshore location and width of the jet for unsteady forcing with amplitude 1 f=0.5 f=1.0 v yy0 y+ yy0 y+ 0 -0.41 0 0.4 -0.4 0 0.42 0.25 0.39 0.72 0.84 0.61 0.88 0.98 0.5 0.87 1.01 1.07 1.01 1.09 1.61 0.75 1.04 1.15 1.26 1.16 1 1.3 1.38 1.56 1.33 f=1.5 f=2.0 v yy0 y+ yy0 y+ 0 -0.41 0 0.41 -0.41 0 0.42 0.25 0.8 0.9 0.96 0.81 0.9 0.96 0.5 1.11 1.22 1.36 1.01 1.05 1.09 0.75 1.36 1.44 1 1.34 1.43 f=2.5 v yy0 y+ 0 -0.39 0 0.44 0.25 0.82 0.88 0.97 0.5 1.12 1.29 1.44 0.75 1.29 1.42 1.7 1

PAGE 96

LIST OF REFERENCES Aagaard, T., B. Greenwood, and J. Nielson, 1997, Mean currents and sediment transport in a rip channel, Mar. Geol., 140, pp. 25-45. Bowen, A. J., 1969, Rip currents, 1. Theoretical investigations. Journal of Geophysical Research, 74, pp. 5467-5478. Bowen, A. J., D. I. Inman, 1969, Rip currents, 2. Laboratory and field investigations. Journal of Geophysical Research, 74(23), pp. 5479-5490. Bowman, D., D. Arad, D.S. Rosen, E. Kit, R. Goldbery, and A. Slavicz, 1988, Flow characteristics along the rip current system under low-energy conditions. Marine Geology, 79, pp. 149-167. Brander, R. W., 1999, Field observations on morphodynamic evolution of a low-energy rip current system. Marine Geology, 157(3-4), pp. 199-217. Brander, R. W, and A. D. Short, 2000, Morphodynamics of a large-scale rip current at Muriwai Beach, New Zealand. Marine Geology, 165, pp. 27-39. Brander, R. W., A. D. Short, 2001, Flow kinematics of low-enegy rip current systems. J. Coast. Res., 17(2), pp. 468-481. Brocchini, M., A. B. Kennedy, L. Soldini, and A. Mancinelli, 2004, Topographically-controlled, breaking wave-induced macrovortices. Part 1. Widely separated breakwaters, J. Fluid Mech., in press. Bhler, O., 2000, On the vorticity transport due to dissipating or breaking waves n shallow-water flow, J. Fluid Mech., 407, pp. 235-263. Bhler, O., and T. E. Jacobson, 2001, Wave-driven currents and vortex dynamics on barred beaches, J. Fluid Mech., 449, pp. 313-339. Chandramohan, P., V. S. Kumar, B. K. Jena, 1997, Rip current zones along the beaches in Goa, west coast of India, J. Waterway, Port, Coast., and Ocean. Eng., 123(6), pp.322-328. Chen, Q., R. A. Dalrymple, J. T. Kirby, A. B. Kennedy, and M. C. Haller, 1999, Boussinesq modeling of a rip current system, J. Geophys. Res., 104, pp. 20,617-20,637. 85

PAGE 97

86 Cooke, D. O., 1970, The occurrence and geological work of rip currents off the coast of southern California. Marine Geology, 9, pp. 173-186. Dalrymple, R. A., 1975, A mechanism for rip current generation on an open coast, J. Geophys. Res., 80(24), pp. 3485-3487. Dalrymple, R. A., 1978, Rip currents and their causes, Proc. of 16th Conf. on Coast. Eng., Hamburg, Vol. II, pp. 1414-1427. Dalrymple, R. A., C. J. Lozano, 1978, Wave-current interaction models for rip currents, J. Geophys. Res., 83, pp. 6063-6071. Davis, W. M., 1925, The Undertow, Science, Vol. LXII pp. 206-208. Dean, R. G., and R. A. Dalrymple, 1984, Water wave mechanics for engineers and scientists, Prentice-Hall, Old Tappan, NJ, USA Dronen, N., H. Karunarathna, J. Fredsoe, B. M. Sumer, and R. Deigaard, 1999, The circulation over a longshore bar with rip channels, Proc. Coast. Sed., New York, pp. 576-587. Dronen, N., H. Karunarathna, J. Fredsoe, B. M. Sumer, R. Deigaard, 2002, An experimental study of rip channel flow, J. Coast. Eng., 45, pp. 223-238. Falqus, A., A. Montoto, D. Vila, 1999, A note on hydrodynamic instabilities, and horizontal circulation in the surfzone, J. Geophys. Res., 104(20), pp. 605-620. Haas, K. A., 2002, Laboratory measurements of the vertical structure of rip currents, J. Geophysical Research-Oceans, 107 (C5), Art. No. 3047. Hass, K. A., I. A. Svendsen, and M. C. Haller, 1998, Numerical modeling of nearshore circulations on a barred beach with rip channels, Proc. 26th Conf. On Coastal Eng., ASCE, Copenaghen. Haller, M. C., R. A. Dalrymple, I. A. Svendsen, 1997, Rip channels and nearshore circulation, Proc. Coast. Dyn., Plymouth, U.K., pp. 594-603. Haller, M. C., R. A. Dalrymple, 1999, Rip current dynamics and nearshore circulation, Center for Applied Coast. Res., Res. Rep. # CACR-99-05, pp. 1-144. Haller, M. C., R. A. Dalrymple, 2001, Rip current instabilities, J. Fluid Mech., 433, pp. 161-192. Haller, M. C., R. A. Dalrymple, I. A. Svendsen, 2002, Experimental study of nearshore dynamics on a barred beach with rip channels, J. Geophys. Res.-Oceans, 107 (C6) Art. No. 3061

PAGE 98

87 Hamm, L., 1992, Directional nearshore wave propagation over a rip channel: an experiment, Proc. Intl. Conf. Coast. Eng., New York, pp. 226-239. Harris, T. F. W., 1961, The nearshore circulation of water, CSIR Symp. S2, South Africa, pp. 18-31 Harris, T. F. W., 1964, A qualitative study of the nearshore circulation off a Natal beach with a submerged longshore sand bar, M. Sc. Thesis, University of Natal, Durban, South Africa Hino, M., 1975, Theory of the formation of rip-current and cuspidal coast, Proc. 14th Int. Coastal Eng. Conf., Copenhagen, ASCE press, pp. 901-919. Holland, K. T., R. A. Holman, T. C. Lippmann, 1997, Practical use of video imagery in nearshore oceanographic field studies, J. Ocean Eng., 22, pp. 81-91. Iwata, N., 1976, Rip current spacing, J. of Oceanographic Society of Japan, 32, pp. 1-10. Kennedy, A. B., 2003, A circulation description of a rip current neck, J. Fluid Mech., 497, pp. 225-234 Kennedy, A. B., R. A. Dalrymple, 2001, Wave group forcing of rip currents, Ocean Wave Measurement and Analysis, V. 2, pp 1426-1435 Komar, P. D., 1998, Beach processes and sedimentation, 2nd Edition, Prentice Hall, Inc., Englewood Cliffs, NJ, USA Lascody, R. L., 1998, East Central Florida rip current program, National Weather Digest, 22(2), pp. 25-30. Longuet-Higgins, M. S., 1970a, Longshore currents generated by obliquely incident sea waves, 1, J. Geophys. Res., 75, pp. 6778-6789. Longuet-Higgins, M. S., 1970b, Longshore currents generated by obliquely incident sea waves, 2, J. Geophys. Res., 75, pp. 6790-6801. Longuet-Higgins, M. S., R. W. Stewart, 1964, Radiation stress in water waves, a physical discussion with applications, Deep Sea Res., 11(4), pp. 529-563. MacMahan, J., A. J. H. M. Reniers, T. P. Stanton, and E. B. Thorton, 2004, Infragravity rip current pulsations, J. Geophys. Res., 109, C01033, doi: 10.1029/2003JC002068. Munk, W. H., 1949, Surf beats, Eos Trans. AGU, 30(6), pp. 849-854. McKenzie, P., 1958, Rip current systems, J.Geol., 66, pp.103-113. Oh, T. M., R. G. Dean, 1996, Three-dimensional hydrodynamics on a barred beach, Proc. Intl. Conf. Coast. Eng., New York, pp. 3680-3692.

PAGE 99

88 Peregrine, D. H., 1998, Surf zone currents, Theoretical and computational fluid dynamics, 10 (1-4), pp. 295-309. Peregrine, D. H., 1999, Large-scale vorticity generation by breakers in shallow and deep water, Eur. J. Mech. B/Fluids, 18, pp. 403-408. Ranashinghe, R., G. Symonds, and R. Holman, 1999, Quantitative characterization of rip dynamics via video imaging, Proc. Coast. Sed., pp. 576-587. Sasaki, T. O., and K. Horikawa, 1979, Observations of nearshore currents and edge waves, Proc. 16th Coastal Eng. Conf., Hamburg, pp. 791-809 Schmidt, W. E., B. T. Woodward, K. S. Millikan, R. T. Guza, B. Raubenheimer, and S. Elgar, 2001, A GPS tracked surfzone drifter, Submitted to J-TECH, November. Shepard, F. P., 1936, Undertow, rip tides, or rip currents, Science, Vol. 84, pp. 181-182. Shepard, F. P., K. O. Emery, E. C. La Fond, 1941, Rip currents: a process of geological importance, J. Geol., 49, pp. 337-369. Shepard F. P., D. L. Inman, 1950, Nearshore water circulation related to bottom topography and wave refraction, EOS Trans. AGU, 31(2), pp. 196-212. Shepard F. P., D. L. Inman, 1951, Nearshore circulation, Proc. 1st Conf. Coastal Eng., Univ. of California, La Jolla, CA pp. 50-59 Slinn, D. N., and J. Yu, 2002, Effects of wave-current interaction on rip currents, J. Geophys. Res. Oceans, 108 (C3), Art. No. 3088 Smith, J. A., J. L. Largier, 1995, Observations of nearshore circulation: rip currents, J. Geophys. Res., 100, pp. 10967-10975. Sonu, C. J., 1972, Field observation of nearshore circulation and meandering currents, J. Geophys. Res., 77, pp. 3232-3247. Thomas, D.A., 2003, Laboratory rip current circulation using video-tracked Lagrangian drifters, M. Sc. Thesis, University of Florida. Wei, G., J. T. Kirby, S. T. Grilli, R. Subramanya, 1995, A fully nonlinear Boussinesq model for surface waves, 1. Highly nonlinear unsteady waves, J. Fluid Mech., 294, pp. 271-299. Wind, H. G., C. B. Vreugdenhil, 1986, Rip current generation near structures, J. Fluid Mech., 171, pp. 459-476. Wright, L. D., and A. D. Short, 1984, Morphodynamic variability of surf zones and beaches: A synthesis, Mar. Geol., 56, pp. 93-118.

PAGE 100

BIOGRAPHICAL SKETCH Enrique Gutirrez Diez was born in Palencia, in the region of Castilla y Len, Spain, to Mr. Enrique Felix Gutirrez Ozmiz and Mrs. Mara Cruz Diez Gonzlez. The author and his family used to spend the summer vacations in Cadiz, in the south of Spain, where he enjoyed the beach and later on he had the opportunity to sail along the south of Spain. These experiences instilled in him the passion for the ocean and everything related to it. After graduating from Victorio Macho High School in 1995, he moved to Santander to pursue the degree in civil engineering at the University of Cantabria. In early 2000 he was accepted to the exchange program to attend the University of Miami during the academic year 2000/2001, during which he took his first coastal related course. After going back to Santander for his final year, he decided to specialize in coastal engineering, during this year he worked as a student assistant in the Department of Coastal and Oceanographic Engineering (GIOC) at the University of Cantabria. After being accepted to a number of universities, he decided to go to Gainesville, Florida, to get his Master of Science in coastal engineering at the University of Florida. Upon obtaining the degree the author plans to go back to Spain to work on this exciting field. 89


Permanent Link: http://ufdc.ufl.edu/UFE0004905/00001

Material Information

Title: Effects of Longshore Currents on Rip Currents
Physical Description: Mixed Material
Copyright Date: 2008

Record Information

Source Institution: University of Florida
Holding Location: University of Florida
Rights Management: All rights reserved by the source institution and holding location.
System ID: UFE0004905:00001

Permanent Link: http://ufdc.ufl.edu/UFE0004905/00001

Material Information

Title: Effects of Longshore Currents on Rip Currents
Physical Description: Mixed Material
Copyright Date: 2008

Record Information

Source Institution: University of Florida
Holding Location: University of Florida
Rights Management: All rights reserved by the source institution and holding location.
System ID: UFE0004905:00001


This item has the following downloads:


Full Text












EFFECTS OF LONGSHORE CURRENTS ON RIP CURRENTS


By

ENRIQUE GUTIERREZ


















A THESIS PRESENTED TO THE GRADUATE SCHOOL
OF THE UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT
OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF
MASTER OF SCIENCE

UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA


2004





























This document is dedicated to my mother and father.










ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

This research was funded by the 2002-2004 and 2004-2006 Florida Sea Grant

Program. I would like to thank Andrew B. Kennedy for his academic guidance and

support in the research leading to the present thesis. I would also like to thank Robert. J.

Thieke for providing financial assistance and giving me the opportunity to be part of a

very exciting project, and Robert G. Dean for his help and for serving on my supervisory

committee.

I would also like to thank Oleg A. Mouraenko for his support and guidance with

Matlab, if I have any skills with Matlab it is thanks to him. I also want to thank Jamie

MacMahan, who gave me guidance ever since I got here.

I would like to thank all of my office mates and friends in Gainesville in general,

for making my stay here a very good experience and especially my roommate, Vadim

Alymov. I will never forget all of them.

Finally I would like to thank my family, especially my parents, who made many

sacrifices to provide me with financial support to get my undergraduate degree back in

Spain. They have always been there for me.
















TABLE OF CONTENTS
Page

A C K N O W L E D G M E N T S ......... .................................................................................... iii

L IST O F T A B L E S ......... ............................... ......... ... ....... ....... vi

L IST O F FIG U R E S .... ...... ...................... ........................ .. ....... .............. vii

CHAPTER

1 IN TR OD U CTION ............................................... .. ......................... ..

Problem Statem ent and O objective ........................................ .......................... 1
B background: Literature R eview ......................................................... ............... 3
Physical Description of Rip Currents .............................................................5
Forcing Mechanisms of Rip Currents and Longshore Currents............................9
Forcing of longshore currents ........................................... ............... 10
F orcing of rip currents...................................................................... .. .... 10
G generation of V orticity .................................................................................. 12
O utlin e of the T h esis............. ............................................................ ......... ........ 13

2 N U M E R IC A L M O D E L ..................................................................... ..................15

T heoretical B ackground............................................ ....................................... 15
R ip C u rrent S calling ................ ................................................ .......... ... ........... 17
Num erical Description of the M odel ...................................................................... 18

3 RE SU LTS AN D AN ALY SIS............................................................................... 21

Mean Peak Offshore Current in the Rip Neck.................................... ..................21
Parameter (DF / Dt) Estimations.......................................... ...............22
M eth o d 1 ..............................................................2 2
M ethod 2 ........................................24
M odel Com prisons w ith Lab D ata..................... .............. ............... .... 25
Effects of Background Longshore Current on the Rip Current..............................32
Steady F forcing ............... .. ............................................................... 32
V elocities in the rip neck ......................................... .......... ............... 34
V orticity ................. .... .......... ....................... ............... 3 7
Jet angle evolution with increasing background longshore current .............40
U n steady F orcing .......... ................................................................ .... .. .... .. 4 1










V elocities in the rip neck .......................................... .......................... 44
V o rtic ity .................................................................................................. 4 6

4 SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS.......................................................................54

APPENDIX

A M EA N V O R TIC ITY M A P S ............................................................. ....................59

B LOCATION AND WIDTH OF THE JET DATA ............................................... 80

L IST O F R E F E R E N C E S ......... ...... ........... ................. ...............................................85

B IO G R A PH IC A L SK E T C H ...................................................................... ..................89










































v















LIST OF TABLES


Table pge

3-1 U nsteady forcing sim ulations ....................................................... ............... 42

B-1 Alongshore location and width of the jet for steady forcing.............................80

B-2 Alongshore location and width of the jet for unsteady forcing with amplitude
0 .2 5 ............................................................................... 8 1

B-3 Alongshore location and width of the jet for unsteady forcing with amplitude 0.5.82

B-4 Alongshore location and width of the jet for unsteady forcing with amplitude 0.7583

B-5 Alongshore location and width of the jet for unsteady forcing with amplitude 1 ....84
















LIST OF FIGURES


Figure page

1-1 Rip current parts: feeders neck and head (from Shepard et al., 1941). ..................7

1-2 Tim e-averaged vorticity .................................. ................. ........ ............... 12

2-1 Definition sketch of the m odel.......................................................... ............... 17

3.1 Sketch of w ave breaking over a bar .................................... .................................. 23

3-2 Experimental wave basin at the University of Delaware .............. ...................26

3.3 C current m eter location .......................................... ................... ............... 27

3-4 Wave height and MWL versus cross-shore distance at the center bar (left) and at
the rip channel (right) for test E ........................................ .......................... 28

3-5 Cross-shore velocities in the rip: model predictions vs. lab data...........................29

3-6 Cross-shore velocities in the rip: model predictions vs. lab data...........................31

3-7 Snapshots of the simulations for different background longshore currents with
ste ad y fo rcin g ...................................................................... 3 3

3-8 Computed mean velocities on a longshore profile at x = -0.5...............................35

3-9 Mean peak offshore velocities with increasing background longshore currents at
different cross-shore locations ........................................... .......................... 36

3-10 Mean peak offshore velocity versus background longshore current........................37

3-11 M ean vorticity maps for steady forcing ....................................... ............... 38

3-12 M ean vorticity maps for steady forcing ....................................... ............... 39

3-13 Jet angle vs. background longshore current .................................. .................41

3-14 Comparison of the simulations for steady and unsteady forcing .............................43

3-15 Mean peak offshore velocities in the jet at the cross-shore location x = -0.5 for
different am plitudes.......... ............................................................ .. .... .... ..... 45









3-16 Mean peak offshore velocities in the jet at the cross-shore location x = -0.5 for
different frequencies ............................................ ... .. .. ...... .. ............ 46

3-17 Mean vorticity maps for unsteady forcing with amplitude 1 and frequency 1.........47

3-18 Alongshore location and width of the jet at x = -0.5 with increasing longshore
current for each am plitude............................................... ............................. 49

3-19 Alongshore location and width of the jet at x = -0.5 with increasing longshore
current for each frequency............................................... ............................. 50

3-20 Alongshore location and width of the jet at x = -0.5 with increasing group
am plitude for each frequency ................................. ............... ............... 51

3-21 Alongshore location and width of the jet at x = -0.5 with increasing group
frequency for each am plitude ................................. ............... ............... 52

3-22 Mean vorticity map for unsteady forcing with amplitude 1, frequency 1.5and
background longshore current of 0.75 .......... ......... .............................. 53

A-i M ean vorticity map for steady forcing. ........................................ ............... 59

A-2 Mean vorticity maps for unsteady forcing with amplitude 0.25 and frequency 0.5.60

A-3 Mean vorticity maps for unsteady forcing with amplitude 0.25 and frequency 1....61

A-4 Mean vorticity maps for unsteady forcing with amplitude 0.25 and frequency 1.5.62

A-5 Mean vorticity maps for unsteady forcing with amplitude 0.25 and frequency 2....63

A-6 Mean vorticity maps for unsteady forcing with amplitude 0.25 and frequency 2.5.64

A-7 Mean vorticity maps for unsteady forcing with amplitude 0.50 and frequency 0.5.65

A-8 Mean vorticity maps for unsteady forcing with amplitude 0.50 and frequency 1....66

A-9 Mean vorticity maps for unsteady forcing with amplitude 0.50 and frequency 1.5.67

A-10 Mean vorticity maps for unsteady forcing with amplitude 0.50 and frequency 2....68

A-11 Mean vorticity maps for unsteady forcing with amplitude 0.50 and frequency 2.5.69

A-12 Mean vorticity maps for unsteady forcing with amplitude 0.75 and frequency 0.5.70

A-13 Mean vorticity maps for unsteady forcing with amplitude 0.75 and frequency 1....71

A-14 Mean vorticity maps for unsteady forcing with amplitude 0.75 and frequency 1.5.72

A-15 Mean vorticity maps for unsteady forcing with amplitude 0.75 and frequency 2....73









A-16 Mean vorticity maps for unsteady forcing with amplitude 0.75 and frequency 2.5.74

A-17 Mean vorticity maps for unsteady forcing with amplitude 1 and frequency 0.5......75

A-18 Mean vorticity maps for unsteady forcing with amplitude 1 and frequency 1.........76

A-19 Mean vorticity maps for unsteady forcing with amplitude 1 and frequency 1.5......77

A-20 Mean vorticity maps for unsteady forcing with amplitude 1 and frequency 2.........78

A-21 Mean vorticity maps for unsteady forcing with amplitude 1 and frequency 2.5......79















Abstract of Thesis Presented to the Graduate School
of the University of Florida in Partial Fulfillment of the
Requirements for the Degree of Master of Science

EFFECTS OF LONGSHORE CURRENTS ON RIP CURRENTS

By

Enrique Gutierrez

May 2004

Chair: Robert J. Thieke
Major Department: Civil and Coastal Engineering

A simplified conceptual representation of a rip current system was used to study the

effects of longshore currents on rip currents. The numerical model used for this study is

based on a generation of vorticity approach, where oppositely signed vortices are

continuously released on either side of the rip channel and let free in the system; and a

background constant and uniform longshore current is also added to the system. A flat

bed, no bottom friction and no wave-current interaction are assumed in the model. Since

generation of vorticity is the only physical process represented in the model, its

applicability is strictly limited to the rip neck area, where this process is assumed to be

dominant. Velocities in the rip current depend only on the strength of wave breaking and

time scales depend both on wave breaking strength and length scales of the system.

Performance of the model was tested against measured laboratory data. Despite the

high simplicity of the model, very reasonable results were obtained in comparison with

the measured data. The model predicts well the trend of the data although overestimates

velocities in the rip. The main challenge to apply the results of the model to field or









laboratory data is the estimation of the generation of circulation within the surf zone.

Two different methodologies were tested.

The model was used to study the effects of longshore currents on rip currents, using

both steady and unsteady forcing. Mean velocity fields and vorticity maps within the area

of the rip neck were calculated. Steady forcing results showed a very strong effect of the

longshore current on the rip current, with nearly constant offshore velocities for small

longshore current strengths, decreasing quickly as the longshore current increases in

strength. A wide range of unsteady forcing parameters (group amplitude and frequency)

was used to test the relative importance of this parameters in the evolution of the rip

current with increasing longshore current strengths. Results suggest that the background

longshore current strength is the main factor in the behavior of the rip current. Effects of

background longshore current are reduced for large group amplitudes. Influence of the

frequency is found to be almost negligible, with response decreasing with higher

frequencies.

The model could be used to evaluate strength of rip currents under a wide range of

wave climates, with simple scaling relations for rip current strength and wave breaking

strength within the surf zone. Model results could be coupled with existing rip current

forecasting indexes.














CHAPTER 1
INTRODUCTION

Problem Statement and Objective

Throughout the world, much population concentrates in the coastal regions.

Beaches are one of the preferred recreational areas, attracting a great amount of people

and tourism in general, thus becoming an important economic and social factor for the

coastal regions.

Researchers have been studying rip currents for decades now, and they have

become an area of interest due to their importance in nearshore morphodynamics but also

the increasing public concern with safety at the beaches all over the world. Nowadays,

the general public is more aware of the dangers of rip currents thanks to information

campaigns, and lifeguards are specifically trained to respond to these events; however,

the number of casualties at the beach is still quite large, and a better understanding of the

behavior of rip currents, specially their response to different wave climates, is still

needed.

The nearshore ocean is a very complex region, where many different processes take

place and create a very dynamic system. In a simple approach to the problem, the waves

arrive to the beach and break, losing energy in the process and transferring momentum

into the water column, thus generating currents. Depending on the incident wave angle,

alongshore currents (oblique incidence) or nearshore circulation cells (shore-normal

incidence) will be generated. These currents will drive sediment transport impacting

beach morphology and can cause erosion, potentially affecting coastal real estate.









When circulation cells form, the seaward directed flow, often observed as a narrow

jet, is known as a "rip current." Currents can reach up to 2 m/s and they cause thousands

of rescues per year in Florida alone, with more deaths due to rip currents than any other

nature disaster related source combined. On average, 19 people have died in Florida per

year since 1989 due to rip currents (Lascody, 1998). It is then a major concern and of

public interest to understand rip current behavior, what causes them and how they

respond to different factors.

A considerable amount of effort has been invested in fieldwork and laboratory

experimentation to better understand the behavior of rip currents. Fieldwork has proven

to be very difficult due to unsteadiness of rip currents, both temporal and spatially, also a

great number of instruments are necessary to cover the entire area of interest. New video

techniques and collaborative efforts between several institutions might provide better data

sets in the future. A limited number of laboratory experiments have been conducted over

the years but usually over a single fixed topography, a wider range of rip current

morphology and wave forcing would be desired. Recently, a number of numerical studies

have been conducted to study rip currents generated with alongshore varying wave

heights using phase-averaged techniques.

This study focuses on a barred beach with rip channels, and is a continuation of the

work published by Kennedy (2003), "A Circulation Description of a Rip Current Neck."

A simple conceptual model, using generation of vorticity and circulation at the edges of

the bar-channel on a barred beach was used to describe the behavior of rip currents in the

area of the rip neck. A simple scaling was introduced which collapses all rip current

topographies to a single form and makes it possible to estimate the relative importance of









the different factors that modulate rip current strength. Although the model was

compared to lab data, here we will use additional data and analyze the performance of

different estimations of the mean rate of generation of circulation (using equations from

Brocchini et al., 2004), which is the basic parameter to scale strength of rip currents with

this model.

Longshore currents are almost always present to some degree; when the waves

approach the coast with an angle and break, the transfer of momentum in the surfzone

will drive longshore currents. Sonu (1972), while studying rip currents of the Gulf coast

of Florida, described how if the waves came with an angle, meandering currents would

form within the surfzone as some form of interaction between longshore and rip currents.

Up to date, it is not well understood how important these interactions may be, and what

relative magnitudes of longshore current are required to modify the offshore flow of the

rip and turn it into a meandering current system. This is not only an interesting scientific

topic, but also might be of use for public safety if threshold conditions could be

determined for the formation of rip currents under oblique incident waves. The present

study will explore this, by simply modifying the conceptual model described by Kennedy

(2003), adding a background longshore component to the system. The response of the rip

will be studied under many different forcing conditions (steady and unsteady) and

background longshore currents strengths. Some insight to the problem will be addressed.

Background: Literature Review

Researchers have been studying rip currents for over 50 years now. There have

been a number of field experiments studying rip currents, although many of these

observations were qualitative and very few quantitative measurements were collected.

These measurements are generally limited to the rip area and are difficult to obtain due to









the difficulty in locating the instruments in the rip channels, which tend to be temporally

and spatially unstable [Shepard et al. (1941), Shepard and Inman (1950, 1951), McKenzie

(1958), Harris (1961,1964), Sonu (1972), Cooke (1970), Sasaki and Horikawa (1979),

Bowman et al. (1988), Smith and Largier (1995), Chandramohan et al. (1997), Aagaard et

al. (1997), Brander (1999), Brander and Short (2000,2001)].

Another approach to the problem is to use video images from shore. Rectified

video images have been used for the quantification of physical processes in the nearshore

(Holland et al., 1997). Ranasinghe et al. (1999) used averaged video images to study

long-term morphological evolution of the beach under the presence of rip currents and

possible generation mechanisms.

In contrast, the controlled environment of the lab allows experimentation of rip

currents in much more detail, however limited laboratory experiments have been

conducted to date [Bowen and Inman (1969), Hamm (1992), Oh and Dean (1996),

Dronen et al. (1999, 2002)] of interest here is the laboratory setup at the Center for

Applied Coastal Research of the University of Delaware, where a number of rip current

experiments have been conducted [Haller et al. (1997), Haller and Dalrymple (1999),

Haller and Dalrymple (2001), Kennedy and Dalrymple (2001), Kennedy (2001), Haller et

al. (2001) that provided a comprehensive map of waves and currents, including the

details of the mean water level variations, Haas (2002)] on a fixed bar-channel

bathymetry.

The availability of costly instruments like ADV's (Acoustic Doppler Velocimeter)

or ADCP's (Acoustic Doppler Current Profilers) is usually limited so it is difficult to

obtain information about the whole flow domain. An alternative to this is the use of









drifters, which have been used in the field in limited cases [Shepard and Inman (1950),

Sonu (1972)], and more recently, Schmidt et al. (2001), who applied direct drifter

tracking using Global Positioning System (GPS) but the relatively high cost of the

drifters limited their availability. In the laboratory environment, Thomas (2003) used

numerous video tracked Lagrangian drifters with the laboratory setup from Haller et al.

(1997).

The concept of radiation stresses developed by Longuet-Higgins (1964) provided a

basis to numerically describe the generation of rip currents with alongshore varying wave

heights using phase-averaged techniques. Bowen (1969) theoretically explored the

generation of circulation cells within the surfzone using alongshore-varying radiation

stresses. A number of numerical studies have been conducted, for example Haas and

Svendsen (1998) and Chen et al. (1999), who used the fully nonlinear extended

Boussinesq equations of Wei et al., (1995), to model the laboratory setup by Haller et al.

(2001), providing valuable insights into rip current behavior. Slinn and Yu (2002)

investigated the effect of wave current interaction on rip currents and showed that it

might be an important factor, weakening the strength of rip currents.

In this section, several aspects of rip currents, including vorticity generation within

the surf zone and longshore currents will be reviewed from previous literature.

Physical Description of Rip Currents

Rip currents can be the most visible feature of nearshore circulation systems. They

are strong, narrow currents that flow seaward through the surf zone, often carrying debris

and sediment, which gives the water a distinctly different color and surface texture from

adjacent waters (Komar, 1998). Rip currents can extent several surf zone widths seaward

exchanging water between the nearshore and offshore. They have been observed all over









the world, on a wide range of beach types but are particularly common on beaches that

are dominated by a longshore bar-trough morphology (Wright and Short, 1984), which is

the focus of this study. They can also form due to interaction with coastal structures like

piers, groins or jetties (Shepard and Inman, 1950; Wind and Vreugdenhil, 1986) or when

longshore currents are directed offshore by a protrusion in the bathymetry or headland

(Shepard and Inman, 1950).

The concept of "rip current" was first proposed by Shepard (1936) (as opposed to

the popular name of "rip tides," since they were found not to be related to tides). In the

early twentieth century, it was believed that bathers were pulled out of the surf by a

violent "undertow," a current beneath the surface that would carry out the water piled up

the beach by the incoming waves. Davis (1925) was the first to challenge this popular

idea. Lifeguards and experienced swimmers were aware of these "rip-tides" that often

carried bathers beyond to depths in which they could not stand.

Shepard (1941) gave a first qualitative description of the rip currents, defining three

main parts, which he called the "feeders," the "neck" and the "head" (see Figure 1-1).

Feeder currents are flows of water that run parallel to shore just outside the beach from

either side of the rip, one of these currents usually being dominant, that "feed" the main

outward-flowing current or "rip neck," which moves at high speeds in narrow lanes

through the breakers essentially at right angles to the general coastal trend. Maximum

flow speeds of up to 2 m/s and 1.3 m/s in the rip neck and feeders respectively have been

recorded in the field (Brander, 1999) although the flow was found highly unsteady. Water

enters the neck not only from the feeders but also to some extent from the sides of the rip

channel farther out (Shepard 1941, Brander and Short 2001). Along the path of the neck,











usually a channel can be found which can be as much as Im deeper than the adjacent bar,

indicating that the flow extends through the entire water column. Beyond the breakers,

the current spreads out and dissipates in what is called the rip "head;" along the side of

the advancing head, eddies are often observable, turning to the right on the right side of

the rip, and to left on the left side (Shepard, 1941). The flow separates from the bottom

and is mainly confined to the surface, which is supported by no evidence of channels

beyond the breakers.


5tOGRt LI4t


Figure 1-1: Rip current parts: feeders neck and head (from Shepard et al., 1941).

Field observations of rip currents have shown long period oscillations in rips on the

wave group time scales (25-250s) of up to 0.4 m/s [Shepard et al. (1941), Shepard and


A 4 .b1 1



e -HAQ

.4 r -



J 1



R(AIKEH P ME -'EtE




0 / I
,f



d p
r// --,,,;









Inman (1950), Sonu (1972), Aagaard (1997), Brander and Short (2001)]; although these

measurements were not accompanied by wave measurements offshore and alongshore the

rip channel, so that relationships between rip currents and wave groups could not be

established. Munk (1949) and Shepard and Inman (1950) suggested that there is a

maximum set up within the surf zone when the largest short waves in a group break,

resulting in a transport of water shoreward that is discharged most efficiently through the

rip channels during the subsequent small short waves of the wave group, Sonu (1972)

hypothesized that rip current pulsations were due to infragravity standing waves.

MacMahan et al. (2004), based on measurements obtained in the Monterey Bay, CA

experiment (RIPEX) concluded that rip current pulsations on that beach were due to

infragravity cross-shore standing waves.

Shepard et al. (1941) stated that records obtained off the coast of Southern

California showed a clear relation between intensity of rip currents and height of waves.

McKenzie (1958), based on observations on sandy Australian beaches, noted that rip

currents are generally absent under very low wave conditions but are more numerous and

somewhat larger under light to moderate swell. This represents an important consequence

for the morphology of the area, since erosional power of rips will significantly increase

under stronger currents.

Another factor that seems to be of importance in modulating the strength of rip

currents is the tide. Numerous field observations in different types of beaches support this

idea. McKenzie (1958) noted a prevalence of rip currents during falling tides and

attributed this to the concentration of the drainage system into the current channels,

resulting in stronger flows. Cooke (1970) off the coast of Redondo Beach, CA observed









that stationary rip channels were commonly present but well defined rip currents were

only present during falling or low tide. Sonu (1972) at Seagrove Beach, FL observed

modulation in rip current intensity with the tide which was attributed both to confinement

of rips to narrower regions in the surf zone and stronger breaking during low tide, thus

increasing the transfer of momentum in the surf zone which drives the currents. Brander

(1999) and Brander and Short (2001) conducted experiments at Palm Beach, New South

Wales, Australia. Rip current velocities reached maximums at low tide and minimum

velocities at high tide, the state of morphological beach evolution was found to be an

important factor as well. Dronen et al. (2002) showed in their laboratory experiments that

rip current velocities increased with increasing wave height and decreasing water level.

A third factor in the occurrence of rip currents is the wave angle. Sonu (1972)

observed closed circulation cells only under the presence of shore normal waves while

meandering alongshore currents would form under oblique incidence.

The numerical study by Kennedy (2003) provided valuable insights in the response

of rip current strength to different factors. Temporal response was found to be dependant

both on length scales of the system and the strength of wave breaking. Velocities only

depended on the strength of the wave breaking but not on the channel width. Also, it was

found that rip current response to unsteady wave forcing was strongly dependent on the

group forcing frequency, with stronger response to low frequencies, decreasing quickly

for high frequencies.

Forcing Mechanisms of Rip Currents and Longshore Currents

The first suggestions as to the cause of rip currents were based on the concept of an

onshore mass transport of water due to the incoming waves. This water, piled up on the

beach would provide the head for the out flowing currents.









Understanding of the forcing driving the currents within the surf zone was greatly

enhanced when Longuet-Higgins and Stewart (1964) introduced the concept of radiation

stress to describe some of the nonlinear properties of surface gravity waves. Radiation

stress (S) was defined as the excess flow of momentum due to the presence of waves. It

can be decomposed in three terms: Sxx, radiation stress component in the direction of the

waves; Syy, radiation stress component in the transverse direction of the waves and Sxy,

the flux in the x direction of the y component of momentum.

Forcing of longshore currents

When waves propagate obliquely into the surf zone and break, this will result in a

reduction in wave energy and an associate decrease in S,, which is manifested as an

applied longshore thrust Fy on the surf zone (Dean and Dalrymple, 1984). For straight

and parallel contours, thrust per unit area is given by:

OSS
F, = [1.1]
Y drx

The longshore wave thrust per unit area is resisted by shear stress on the bottom

and lateral faces of the water column (Longuet-Higgins, 1970 a, b).

Forcing of rip currents

In general, rip currents are contained within nearshore circulation cells that are

driven by periodic longshore variations in the incident wave field. There have been a

number of theories proposed as to the generation mechanisms for these longshore

variations in the incident wave field. They could be divided into three categories:

S Wave-boundary interaction mechanisms. Wave refraction over non-uniform
bathymetry can cause convergence in some areas (headlands) while causing wave
divergence in other areas (canyons) thus resulting in high and low waves
respectively in these areas. An example of rip currents generated by this









mechanism at La Jolla, CA is described by Shepard and Inman (1951) and Bowen
and Inman (1969).

* Wave-wave interaction mechanisms. Bowen and Inman (1969) proposed a model
for generation of circulation cells under the presence of edge waves, where rip
currents are located at every other anti-node and rip spacing is equal to the edge
wave length. Dalrymple (1975) used two synchronous wave trains that approach
the beach from different directions to generate longshore variations in incident
wave height.

* Instability mechanisms. Generation of rip currents on plane smooth beaches can be
explained based on instability theories, where a small initial variation on the wave
field can result in the generation of regularly spaced rip currents [Hino (1975),
Iwata (1976), Dalrymple and Lozano (1978), Falques et al. (1999)].

However, once the rips erode rip channels in the initially longshore uniform beach,

the wave field becomes topographically controlled and the circulation can last long even

after the initial source of longshore wave field variability has diminished or even

disappeared.

Using momentum balance in the direction of the waves, Longuet-Higgins (1964)

showed that radiation stress induces changes in the mean water level (7), creating steady

pressure gradients that balance the gradient of the radiation stress:

dr 1 dS
j I dS, [1.2]
dx pg h + 7) dx

Bowen (1969) exploited the concept of wave set-up to analytically describe the

generation of circulation cells in the nearshore using a transport stream function.

However, as irrotational forcing, wave induced set-up itself cannot generate circulation

(Brocchini, 2003). When the waves break there is a decrease in the radiation stress which

leads to an increase in the set-up, but also this is manifested as a wave thrust or force. If

there is differential breaking alongshore this will generate differential forces which will

generate circulation.









Generation of Vorticity

Although generation of vorticity within the surf zone is quite common, direct

observations of vorticity are very difficult to obtain. Smith and Largier (1995), using

acoustic techniques, observed rip current vortices with radii in the order of 10's of

meters. Schmidt et al. (2001), using direct drifter tracking with GPS technology observed

vorticity within the surf zone. In the laboratory, Thomas (2003) observed time averaged

vorticity in the vicinity of a rip channel, with four distinct macrovortices, two of them

spinning with opposite sign on either side of the rip channel and two more shoreward of

those spinning opposite to them (see figure 1-2).




















Figure 1-2: Time-averaged vorticity; contour = 0. /s; Positive =>Dashed line, Negative
=>Dash-Dot line, and Zero =>Solid line (from Thomas, 2003)

Peregrine (1998) and Bthler (2000) showed theoretically how differential wave

breaking (e.g., at the flanks of wave trains) generates vorticity which re-organizes in the

form of large-scale horizontal eddies with vertical axis or macrovortices. In the case of

alongshore bar-rip channel topography, this generation of circulation is focused at the

edges of the bar, where there is a strong variation in the longshore direction on the wave









breaking. There is oppositely signed generation of vorticity on either side of the channel,

which causes mutual advection offshore of the generated vorticity; this mechanism was

showed by Peregrine (1999).

Buhler and Jacobson (2001) conducted a detailed theoretical and numerical study

of longshore currents driven by breaking waves on a barred longshore uniform beach. An

assumed offshore variability in wave amplitude was necessary to generate differential

breaking and thus generate vortices. Strong dipolar vortex structures evolution produced

a displacement shoreward to the bar trough of the preferred location of the longshore

current, a phenomenon that has been often observed on real barred beaches.

Outline of the Thesis

The present Chapter 1 introduces the problem under study and the objectives of the

thesis, and then an extensive literature review is conducted introducing the various

significant concepts relevant to this work as follows: a) physical description of rip

currents, b) forcing of currents in the surf zone, both longshore and rip currents and c)

generation of vorticity in the surf zone.

Chapter 2 analyses the numerical model used in the study. First, a theoretical

background is given to justify the model, which leads to the discussion of the rip current

scaling that forms the basis of the model and links the model predictions with actual

measured data. Finally a detailed numerical description of the model is given.

Chapter 3 is divided in two parts. First, the model predictions are compared with

available laboratory data, for this, results with no background longshore current are used

since all the available laboratory data are based on shore normal waves. Secondly, several

model runs with a range of background longshore currents are analyzed, both for steady

and unsteady forcing. The relative importance of the model parameters (background






14


longshore current and unsteady forcing parameters: amplitude and frequency) is

discussed.

Chapter 4 summarizes all the results and analysis and conclusions will be drawn.

Suggestion for future research and applications of the model will also be given.














CHAPTER 2
NUMERICAL MODEL

The main goal in the development of this numerical model was developing a very

simple model, both to get fast computational times and to study the scaling of the

different processes present on a rip current. This model was originally written by

Kennedy (2003), simple modifications have been included to study the effects of

background longshore currents in the system. This chapter will discuss the theoretical

background that leads to a simple representation of rip currents (conceptual model), the

scaling parameters and dimensional analysis that makes possible this model, and finally a

numerical description of the model.

Theoretical Background

Although rip currents are part of a very dynamic system, with quite complex

forcing, a simple description can be achieved if we focus on an area where one of these

processes is dominant. That is the case of the rip neck, where oppositely signed

circulation and vorticity are the dominant processes.

One of the most common rip current typologies is the one consisting of a longshore

bar with gaps or rip channels on it. This kind of topography induces a differential wave-

breaking pattern that is more or less stationary on hydrodynamic scales. Although

migration of rip currents has been observed on the field (Ranasinghe et al, 1999) the time

scales are much larger. Generally, there will be strong wave breaking on the bar and

weak or no breaking at all on the rip channels.









Peregrine (1998), using the NLSW equations and a bore dissipation model, showed

how differential breaking along a wave crest generates circulation and vorticity, and that

considering a closed material circuit that crosses the bore only once, the instantaneous

rate of change of circulation generated equals the rate of loss of energy by the water

passing through the bore. Vorticity can be defined as:

F = U-dl [2.1]

In the case of alongshore bar-rip channel topography, this generation of circulation

is focused at the edges of the bar, where there is a strong variation in the longshore

direction on the wave breaking. There is oppositely signed generation of vorticity on

either side of the channel, which causes mutual advection offshore of the generated

vorticity (Peregrine, 1999). New vorticity will continue to be generated at these locations

and then be self-advected offshore and so on. This is the predominant forcing mechanism

in this area, the so-called "rip neck" and all other mechanisms will be neglected. It will be

the basis for the numerical model therefore the region where the model is valid is limited

to the rip neck area.

Rip currents have been observed combined with longshore currents in the field

numerous times, these observations show either oblique rip currents or the formation of

meandering currents (Sonu, 1972). These different phenomena could certainly affect very

differently the "incautious swimmer;" a better understanding of the formation of either

one would then be useful. In order to study the development of these phenomena and

behavior of rip currents with present longshore currents the original numerical model

(Kennedy 2003) was modified to include a background longshore component.








Rip Current Scaling
The model uses three independent parameters to define each different case or run.

These are:

* The half width of the rip channel (R)

* The mean rate of generation of circulation (DF/Dt)

* The mean background alongshore current (v)




V U

IT 4T

Dt 2R Dt

Figure 2-1. Definition sketch of the model.
In order to be able to use the simple representation of a rip current system described

above for a real case (lab experiment or field measured rip), there is a need to relate the

different variables in the real system to the ones present on the model. Using a simple

dimensionless group analysis, the different variables scale as follows:

* Length scales: (x',y')= (x,y)/R

* Velocities: (u',v') = (u,v)/(DF/Dt)2

* Time: t'= t (DF/Dt)1/R

* Circulation: F' = /(R(DF/Dt)2)

Therefore, we will need to determine what R and (DF/Dt) are in the field (lab

experiment) and then scale everything accordingly. Estimating R is relatively easy; more









of a challenge is the parameter (DF/Dt) (strongly dependant on the local topography and

wave breaking strength), two simple methodologies to estimate it will be discussed in

chapter 3.

Using this scaling has great advantages; the simple length scaling allows us to use a

single configuration for the system, with all different topographies converging to a single

form. In the case of absence of a background longshore current (shore normal waves) all

different possible wave strengths are represented by one non-dimensional case. When

longshore currents are present, the non-dimensional longshore current becomes an

additional parameter to define the model.

The provided scaling suggests that velocities in the rip neck depend on the strength

of wave breaking, scaling with (DF/Dt)2, but not on the gap width (R). Temporal

response will depend both on wave breaking strength and length scales (R/(DF/Dt)Y).

These scaling relations discussed by Kennedy (2003) provide a simple way to scale

strength and temporal responses of rip currents not available in the literature previous to

this paper.

Numerical Description of the Model

As described above the numerical model is based on a circulation-vorticity

approach, no other processes are represented in the model, such as wave-current

interaction, 3-D topography (flat bed), bottom friction, forced and free infragravity

waves, instabilities and others. This leads to a highly numerical simplicity of the model,

but its applicability will be limited to the rip current neck area, where circulation and

vorticity generation are assumed to be the dominant process.









Essentially, the system is based on the generation of vorticity at two fixed locations

on either side of the rip channel (x, y) = (0, +1) using a discrete vortex method. Positive x

coordinates are located shoreward f the generation of circulation and negative cross-shore

locations are seaward of the generation of circulation. The model is written in terms of

mass transport velocities. Using the relation for point vortex velocities, U, = F/2;ir, the

model calculates the velocity U at every discrete vortex in the domain as the one induced

by all other vortices present in the domain, then displaces them using a simple Euler

method:

(X, Y)(t) = (X, Y)(t) + U. at [2.2]

Strong interaction between consecutively introduced vortices requires a separation

of time scales in the model, therefore the model releases the discrete vortex pairs in the

system at intervals of At, defined as At = N6t, where 20 < N < 125 (runs used in the

present thesis have values for N of 50 and 100) and 5t is the small time step at which

vortices are being displaced. Therefore, there are two kinds of time steps, the "big time

steps" At, which determine the generation of new vorticity at the generation points, and

the "small time steps" 5t, at which the discrete vortices present in the system are

displaced according to the velocity induced by all other vortices in the system at their

location.

When using steady forcing, the mean generation of circulation (DF/Dt) has a fixed

value of one in the model. Choosing different values for At will allow some tuning in the

model since the strength of the discrete vortex pairs is dependent on At so that the mean

rate of generation of circulation is kept constant at one. The values used for At in this

thesis were 0.03, 0.04 and 0.05; good convergence was obtained with these values so the









less computational demanding value of 0.05 was predominantly used. Also small random

perturbations are added to the strength of each vortex to allow sinusoidal perturbations to

form.

Unsteady forcing can be used in the model by modulating (DF/Dt) with a

sinusoidal component, defined in the input file by an amplitude a (values used in the

analysis range from 0
where used with increments of 0.5):

DF- g =l+a.sin() t) [2.3]


An additional parameter of the model is a constant background longshore current,

this value is added to the longshore component of the computed velocity of each point

vortex. No interaction between this current and the vortices in the domain is assumed.

Several values have been used to study the effects of longshore currents on the rip

strength.

The output files obtained from the model provide location in time and strength

dimensionlesss) off all vortices introduced in the domain in three separate files, one for

the x coordinate, one for the y coordinate and finally another one for the vortices

strength. Using these data files is easy to calculate velocity fields using the point vortex

velocity relations discussed above. A series of Matlab codes were used in the post

processing and analysis of the data in the present thesis.














CHAPTER 3
RESULTS AND ANALYSIS

In the first part of the chapter, model results will be compared to available

laboratory data in an attempt to test the model performance compared with measured

data. Since most of the available lab data is based on experiments with shore normal

waves (due to the difficulty of avoiding reflection at the lateral walls of the basin), only

model results with no background longshore currents could be compared to lab data. In

the second part of the chapter, the effects of longshore currents on rip currents will be

studied using the model results; no lab or field data were available for comparison. Both

steady forcing and group forcing were used.

Mean Peak Offshore Current in the Rip Neck

In the following subchapter the ability of the numerical model (described in chapter

2) to obtain reasonable results will be discussed. In order to evaluate its performance

comparisons with measured data will be performed.

Two sets of available lab data will be used, the first set from Kennedy and

Dalrymple (2001) and other experiments performed by Kennedy and the second set from

Haller et al. (2002).

The model is written in terms of mass transport velocities and works with non-

dimensional quantities; therefore the lab data will be scaled using the scaling

relationships provided in chapter 2. Velocities scale with the square root of the mean rate

of generation of circulation as follows:










(u',v')= (,) [31]
(D t

In order to compare measured velocities with model predictions, these will be

transformed into mass transport velocities (using measured local wave height to calculate

short wave mass transport) and then will be plotted against estimated mean rate of

generation of circulation. Two methodologies to evaluate the model parameter (DF/Dt)

will be discussed.

Parameter (DF / Dt) Estimations

Estimations of the parameter (DF/Dt), mean rate of generation of circulation, are

necessary to compare model predictions with measured data in the lab as stated above.

This is not an easy task since measurements of vorticity are quite complicated to obtain.

Therefore, a methodology that allows the use of alternative measurements (wave heights,

topography, mean water levels...) is necessary. Brocchini et al. (2003) proposed two

different methodologies to estimate the rate of generation of circulation due to differential

breaking along a wave ray, they are based on the wave forced Non Linear Shallow Water

Equations (NSWE).

Method 1

The first methodology needs as inputs topography and offshore wave conditions,

and is based on assumptions on the breaking over the bar. The estimated mean rate of

generation of circulation (DF/Dt) along the wave ray (which is assumed shore normal)

is (e.g., Brocchini et al., 2003):

ID (h, h) gh 2 2 [3.
Dt 16 B8









Where y is the ratio of wave height to water depth (y= 0.78) (depth limited

breaking); / is a constant that relates water depth to wave height assuming the breaking

continuous over the bar (H = /. he, where / = 0.45), h, is the water depth at the bar

crest and hB is the water depth at the start of breaking, which can be estimated using the

following equation for shore-normal waves breaking in shallow water (e.g., Dean &

Dalrymple, 1984):

h = (H2 Cgo)5 5g [3.3]
0 [3.3]

Where Ho and Cgo are the wave height and group velocity in deep water

respectively. Figure 3.1 shows a sketch of breaking over the bar (from Brocchini et al.,

2003).

















Figure 3.1: Sketch of wave breaking over a bar (from Brocchini et al., 2003).

The main characteristic of this approach is the use of predicted processes instead of

using measured local quantities, probably limiting the accuracy of the methodology.

However, it is easier to apply because it doesn't require measurements in the surf zone,

especially if field data were to be compared with the model.









Equation [3.2] estimates the generation of circulation due to the breaking over the

bar, assuming there is no breaking in the rip channel. This is probably not true in many

cases, especially in the field, where some breaking will take place in the channel.

Therefore this methodology only considers the maximum possible generation of

circulation in the system due to the differential breaking in the alongshore as discussed by

Peregrine (1998). A possible fix to this problem would be the introduction of a parameter

(less than 1) that would diminish this estimated generation of circulation.

Method 2

Wave-induced setup is an irrotational forcing and therefore cannot generate

circulation. However, the same breaking wave forces generate setup and circulation so

setup may be used to estimate the generation of circulation across a breaking event in

some mildly restrictive situations (Brocchini et al. 2003). In their paper, Brocchini et al.

came up with an expression that links the change in mean water surface elevation across

a breaking event (with corrections for the irrotational pressure setdown associated with

the waves) with the rate of generation of circulation across that breaking event:


=B- = glB -lA 1,sdB -sdA7, [34]
Dt A

Where r,7, r7 are the measured mean water surface elevations after and before the

breaking event respectively, and r,d, rJd are the irrotational pressure setdown

associated with measured wave heights at those same locations.

This second methodology is then based on locally measured data, both wave and

setup fields, which suggests a better accuracy in the prediction than the first

methodology.









Method 1 assumes that there is no breaking in the channel thus gives the maximum

possible rate of generation of circulation due to the breaking over the bar. Equation [2]

estimates (DF/Dt) in one line so as long as we have data available in the channel we can

account for the breaking in the channel diminishing the generation of circulation in a

more realistic manner.

Model Comparisons with Lab Data

Using the methodologies previously discussed, model predictions will be compared

to available lab data sets. Two data sets will be used, both from experiments performed at

the directional wave basin at the Center for Applied Coastal Research of the University of

Delaware:

* Data set 1: Kennedy and Dalrymple (2001) and Kennedy (2003).

* Data set 2: Haller et al. (2002)

The wave basin is approximately 17.2 m in length and 18.2 m in width, with a

wave-maker at one end that consists of 34 paddles of flap-type. The experimental setup

consists of a fixed beach profile with a steep (1:5) toe located between 1.5 m and 3 m

from the wave-maker and a milder (1:30) sloping section extending from the toe to the

shore of the basin opposite to the wave-maker. The bar system consists of three sections

in the longshore direction with one main section approximately 7.2 m long and centered

in the middle of the basin (to ensure that the sidewalls were located along lines of

symmetry) and two smaller sections of approximately 3.66 m. placed against the

sidewalls. This leaves two gaps of approximately 1.82 m wide, located at /4 and 34 of the

basin width, which serve as rip channels. The edges of the bars on each side of the rip

channels are rounded off in order to create a smooth transition and avoid reflections. The









seaward and shoreward edges of the bar sections are located at approximately x = 11.1 m

and x = 12.3 m respectively (Figure 3-2). The crest of the bar sections are located at

approximately x = 12 m with a height of 6 cm above their seaward edge.


Figure 3-2: Experimental wave basin at the University of Delaware, (a) Plan view and (b)
cross section (from Haller et al., 2002)

If the experiments are considered as an undistorted Froude model of field

conditions with a length scale ratio of 1/30, then the experimental conditions correspond

to a rip spacing of 270 m and rip channel width of 54 m. The Haller dataset would


1Z 1t 4 1,82 ro .66
j. 1 1e + r r

II!iKi










correspond to breaking wave heights of 0.8-2.3 m, wave periods of 4.4-5.5 s, and mean

offshore velocities of 0.8-1.7 m/s in the rip neck.

The first dataset was analyzed by Kennedy (2003); here it will be analyzed together

with Haller's dataset, which expands the range of wave conditions (larger waves). It

consists of measurements of offshore wave conditions and cross-shore velocities in three

different locations (in the alongshore) of the rip neck. Although the 3 ADV's were

located relatively close together, (see figure 3-3) there are significant differences in the

measured velocities probably due to jet instability of the rip current. (Haller and

Dalrymple, 2001). To address this, the largest and smallest means of the three ADV's are

plotted together with the mean of all three ADV's as an error bar plot.



13

12.5
A
II
2 12
c XXX
U)
11.5

11

10.5
12 12.5 13 13.5 14 14.5 15 15.5
y (m)


Figure 3.3: Current meter location in Kennedy (2003), ADV 1 (y=13.52m, x=11.8m);
ADV 2 (y=13.72 m, x=11.8m); ADV 3 (y=13.92m, x=11.8m)

Haller's dataset consists of mean values of the measured cross-shore velocities in

the rip, and wave heights and mean water levels along cross-shore profiles on the bar and

the channel (see figure 3-4). Although velocities were measured in a wide range of

locations within the rip channel these mean velocities will be assumed to be the mean rip













neck velocities for comparisons with the model. For detailed information on location of


instruments see Haller and Dalrymple (1999).


At the center of the bar





S3
S.------------------------ ------------ ------------ .
3 ------------------------------------------



-15 -1 -05 0 0
X'

n ----------------


04
[13
E
,L02


0o 1
0


-02
-1


Rip channel












-1 -1 -05 0 05
X'


-1 -05
X'


-1 5 -1 -05
X'


Figure 3-4. Wave height and MWL versus cross-shore distance at the center bar (left) and

at the rip channel (right) for test E (from Haller et al., 2002)


Both data sets and the model predictions are shown in figure 3-5. Model


predictions are shown at two locations, at the cross shore location where the two fixed


generation points are (0,0), where the model predicted quantitatively well velocities at


startup (see Kennedy, 2003) and at a shoreward location from that point (0.5,0), which


seems to better fit the lab data. The error bars in red represent Kennedy's data and


Haller's data is shown in blue symbols.





























0.06 0.08
(DF/Dt), (m 2s2)


Figure 3-5: Cross-shore velocities in the rip: model predictions vs. lab data. Model
predictions at (0,0) and (0.5,0); Kennedy, 2003 (red error bars); Haller, 2002
[method 1 (squares), method 2 with no breaking in the channel (circles),
method 2 with breaking in the channel (triangles)

The availability of mean water levels and wave heights along profiles on the bar

and channel allows us to use method 2 to estimate the generation of circulation. Due to

very shallow water there are some gaps in the data on the profiles on the crest of the bar

(see figure 3-4), therefore it is difficult to determine the end of the breaking event on the

bar and the channel profiles. For comparison reasons, the farthest offshore point in the

profile is taken as point A, and the measurement just shoreward of the bar is taken as the

point B to apply equation [3.4] for all the experiments. Method 2 is applied both

considering the breaking at the channel thus diminishing the generation of circulation

(triangles) and neglecting the breaking in the channel (circles) so that it can be compared

to method 1 (squares), which neglects any breaking in the channel. Looking at figure 3-4,









it seems like method 1 overestimates by almost a factor of two the generation of

circulation (some estimates are out of range in the figure) as compared to method 2,

probably due to an overestimation of the breaking over the bar. Method 2 applied to both

the bar and the channel seems to concentrate all the data in a narrow range of rates of

generation of circulation, which doesn't make much sense since larger waves should

generate larger circulation. A reason for this could be the relative location of the

circulation cells, which would move offshore for larger wave experiments, but since

equation [3.4] is applied at the same cross shore locations for all the cases we could be

looking at locations situated too far shoreward where a second circulation cell of opposite

sign forms (as described in Haller, 2002). It seems like the lack of data in the bar crest

area mentioned before limits the applicability of this methodology.

Figure 3-6 shows the model predictions plotted versus the lab data using

methodology 1 for both data sets, so that they can be compared. Haller's experiments

consists of larger waves, therefore the predicted (DF/Dt) is larger. In general the model

predicts very well the trend of the data, although it seems to over predict the velocities on

the rip. For larger waves (Haller's data), the trend for the velocities seems to flatten out,

obtaining lower velocities than expected, the reason for this could be the relative location

of the velocity measurements with respect to the generation points being displaced

shoreward since larger waves will break farther offshore. Also, when breaking occurs

past the bars there will be breaking in the channel as well, diminishing the amount of

circulation generated.





























0.06 0.08
(DF/Dt)o (m2/s2)


Figure 3-6: Cross-shore velocities in the rip: model predictions vs. lab data. Model
predictions at (0,0) and (0.5,0); Kennedy, 2003 (red error bars); Haller, 2002
(blue squares) (Both applying method 1).

Kennedy (2003), showed a good quantitative prediction of the velocities at startup

at the location (0,0), although past the initial peak measured velocities decayed more than

in the model. This was attributed to the effects of wave-current interaction starting to take

part. This could be one of the reasons why the model over predicts the velocities, but

other neglected physical processes like bottom friction, 3D effects, etc are probably not

negligible here. Also, relative location of the measurement points with respect to the

generation points is certainly difficult. This could be adjusted with some kind of constant

parameter to decrease predicted velocities, however if the model is used as a predictive

tool it would give predictions that are conservative.









Effects of Background Longshore Current on the Rip Current

As described on chapter 2, the original numerical model used in Kennedy (2003)

was modified to include an additional parameter v, which represents a constant and

uniform background longshore current in the system. This background non-dimensional

current scales as any other velocity in the system with (DF/Dt) .

In this subchapter, the effects of different background alongshore-current strengths

on the rip current will be studied. First, steady forcing will be used to analyze the

evolution of the jet with increasing background longshore currents. Estimations for the

angle of the jet and mean offshore peak velocities will be given. In the second part,

unsteady forcing will be used with a number of different parameters for the group

forcing. The effects and relative importance of the different parameters will be analyzed.

Steady Forcing

A number of different background current strengths were used with steady forcing

in the model ranging from 0 to 1 dimensionless unit at increments of 0.05. Model runs of

50 dimensionless time units were used with different computational resolutions (At).

Once the data files were obtained from the model, a series of matlab routines were

used to obtain velocity fields within the area of the rip neck and also maps of mean

vorticity. Velocities at any location were calculated as the sum of all the induced

velocities by each vortex present in the system using the relation for point vortex

velocities. The vorticity with time was defined as the sum of the strength of all vortices

present in predefined boxes in the system divided by the area of the box.























t=15


t=25
t 25

4

,2 1



-2
-6 -4 -2 0
x/R


-6 -4 -2
x/R


t= 10


t=20

4




0 t0
-2
-6 -4 -2 0
t=30

4

c: 2



-2
-6 -4 -2 0
x/R


t= 10


0 -6 -4 -2
x/R


t=5 (b)v=0.25 t=10


t=15

4 *f





-2
-6 -4 -2 0
t=25

4^

jQ 4)
22 A.,


t=20


t=30


x/R x/R


t=5 (d)v=0.75 t=10


4

r 2

0

-2



4

' 2


-6 -4 -2 0 -6 -4 -2 0
x/R x/R


Figure 3-7. Snapshots of the simulations for different background longshore currents with
steady forcing, positive vortices are plotted in red and negative vortices in
blue: a)v = 0, b)v = 0.25, c)v = 0.50 d)v = 0.75


t=5 (a) v=0


t=5 (c)V = 0.5

S 4



0


I









The introduction of a background longshore current in the system has dramatic

effects as can be seen in the in figure 3-7, where snapshots of the system in time from the

start of the simulations are shown.

In figure 3-7 a) a simulation with no background current is shown. The sequence

shows how two macrovortices form at the start of the simulation and then, as they

continue to increase in strength they interact with each other and get advected offshore.

After this vortex couple leaves the generation area, the rip neck behaves as a turbulent jet.

This behavior is observed for all the different background longshore current strengths in

figure 3-7, although the size of the initial macrovortices is decreased with increasing

longshore current strength as the macrovortices are pushed downstream before they can

reach higher strength. These initial macrovortices result in a peak in the offshore velocity

in the rip neck, and a decline in the velocity follows once the turbulent jet-like flow is

established. Looking at the stronger longshore current cases, it seems apparent an

increase in the interaction between the vortices from either side of the rip channel would

cancel each others effects as they have opposite signs (vortices shown in two colors to

indicate opposite signs).

Velocities in the rip neck

Velocity time series were obtained for alongshore profiles located at different

cross-shore locations (x = 0, x = 0.25, x = 0.5, x = 0.75, x = 1). In order to avoid

turbulent jet instabilities and possible local interaction with passing point vortices,

averages of the velocities were performed without taking into account the initial peak in

cross-shore velocities due to the formation of the macrovortices.









The location of the jet was defined by the one-third highest offshore velocities for

each alongshore velocity profile. Once the velocities within the jet were located, their

average was defined as the mean peak offshore velocity (see figure 3-8).

v = 0.25



2-i-
3.5


..




> 0.5 .- Z


1 :

-1 ,

-1.5
-3 -2 -1 0 1
x/R

Figure 3-8. Computed mean velocities on a longshore profile at x = -0.5

Figure 3-9 shows the mean peak offshore velocities plotted against increasing

background longshore currents. Peak offshore velocities increase farther offshore as the

jet narrows for small background longshore currents, however as the longshore current

strength increases this pushes the vortices downstream causing more interaction between

opposite sign vortices (canceling their effects), thus decreasing the offshore velocities

more quickly. The velocities were plotted only as far as x = -1 because the applicability

of the model is limited to the rip neck area and other physical processes would become

dominant that far offshore.










Velocities at x = 0 are influenced by the presence of two discontinuity points, the

source points where the new point vortices are inserted in the system. From now on we

will be looking at the velocities at the location x = -0.5 since it is far enough from those

discontinuities but close enough so that generation of vorticity and circulation remains

the dominant physical process.


Figure 3-9. Mean peak offshore velocities with increasing background longshore currents
at different cross-shore locations

Figure 3-10 shows the evolution of the mean peak offshore velocities with

increasing background longshore currents at the cross-shore location x=-0.5 for

different computational resolutions (e.g., time increment at which a new vortex pair is

introduced in the system). Good convergence is obtained with the model for all different

resolutions, which allows us to use the less computationally demanding resolution of

At = 0.05.


upeak vs background at different x locations
1.4


1.2




0
n, 0.8-

E
~0.6
0
3 0 4 0 .4...


0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1
background dimensionlesss)










The plot shows a strong effect of the background longshore current (v) on the rip

current strength. Almost constant values of the mean peak offshore velocity are observed

for low values of the background longshore current (v < 0.3) with a rapid decrease for

larger values v. For background longshore currents of v > 0.8 the offshore currents

become very small. As stated above, since there are no other dissipative mechanisms the

main reason for this rapid decrease in the offshore velocity is the higher interaction

between oppositely signed vortices, which cancels out their effects as the longshore

current strength increases.


Figure 3-10. Mean peak offshore velocity versus background longshore current

Vorticity

Since the model is based on the generation of point vortex pairs within the rip neck

area, it is very straightforward to obtain measures of vorticity in the system. Mean


upeak vs background at location x = 0.5
with different computational resolutions
1.4

1.2


0) 1
0
u, 0.8

E
o 0.6


0-0.4


0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1
background












vorticity values at any time for predetermined boxes (of size 0.25 by 0.25 dimensionless


units) are the sum of the strength of all the individual point vortices contained within


each particular box divided by the area of the box. Mean vorticity maps (see appendix A)


were obtained by averaging with time the instantaneous measures of vorticity in the


domain.


Measure


5
a)
4
()
(I
a)
c 3
0



0v

-6-
0


-2


-2 -1 0 1
Cross shore dimensionlesss)


)f mean vorticity in the system

0.5 5
b)
4

0.25 _
c 3


0




-0.25




-0.5


Cross shore dimensionlesss)


5 .0.5
c)
4
U)
(I)
a) 0.25
c 3
(/)
a) 2
E

o 0
(--

0 -0.25

-1

v = 0.2
-2 -0.5
-2 -1 0 1
Cross shore dimensionlesss)


5 0.5
d)


| I\ \) I. 0.25
E 3


a) 2-



1 0
0
E 3-0.25
o

-1

v 0.3
-2- -0.5
-2 -1 0 1
Cross shore dimensionlesss)


Figure 3-11. Mean vorticity maps for a) v = 0, b)v = 0.1, c)v = 0.2 and d) v = 0.3


0.5




0.25



0




-0.25




-0.5













Measure of mean vorticity in the system

0.5 5
a) b)<

40.5
0.25 .0
E3 nil


5

4
ci,
(D
S 3
ro
a 2
E

r-0-
1
0
0c
o
a


Cross shore dimensionlesss)


5

4

c(D
0
c3



(D 1


-2' I
-2 -1 0 1
Cross shore dimensionlesss)


Cross shore dimensionlesss)


0.5



0.25



0



-0.25



-0.5


5 0.5

4

- \ 0.25
c 3


( 2
E
0 \\0



C / -0.25
a
-1

v .7
-2 -0.5
-2 -1 0 1
Cross shore dimensionlesss)


Figure 3-12. Mean vorticity maps for a)v = 0.4, b)v = 0.5, c)v = 0.6 and d)v = 0.7


Figures 3-11 and 3-12 show mean vorticity maps for increasing values of the


background longshore current, with increments of 0.1 dimensionless current from no


current up to v = 0.7, for which the offshore current becomes very small. The vorticity


maps for v < 0.3 show no mixing between vortices of opposite signs with the jet getting


0



-0.25



-0.5


0.5



0.25



0



-0.25



-0.5









pushed downstream thus narrowing farther offshore and increasing the peak velocities in

the jet farther offshore (see figure 3-9). For stronger background longshore currents

(v > 0.3) mixing between oppositely signed vortices starts to occur, as the upstream

vortices are pushed into the downstream source of vortices. Some of these point vortices

go right through the source point and might change their trajectory radically, resulting in

some very small mean values of vorticity (- 0.1 < F < 0 dimensionless units) away from

the actual jet. When the longshore current becomes very strong the mechanism with

which the vortex pairs get advected offshore weakens and the longshore current becomes

dominant in the system.

Jet angle evolution with increasing background longshore current

Since the jet gets displaced downstream with the background longshore current, in

order to obtain a representative angle of the jet the angle of the velocities within the jet

was averaged with time. The angle was measured relative to the shore-normal, therefore

for no longshore background current the angle should be close to 0 degrees. As before the

jet was defined by the one-third highest offshore velocities for each alongshore velocity

profile. To be consistent, the velocity profile at the cross-shore location x = -0.5 was

used for the angle calculations.

Figure 3-13 shows the evolution of the jet angle with increasing background

longshore current strength. The jet angle increases almost linearly with the current.

Offshore velocities and background longshore current scale the same way so if the

longshore current had no effect on the jet an angle of about 45 degrees should be

expected for a background longshore current of 1. However, the plot shows how the

angle reaches 80 degrees for that value of v, indicating a strong effect of the background











longshore current on the strength of the offshore velocities, thus turning the jet in the

alongshore direction.


Figure 3-13. Jet angle vs. background longshore current

Unsteady Forcing

As described in chapter 2, the forcing in the model, fixed at value 1 for steady

forcing, can be modulated using a harmonic representation with a group amplitude and

frequency (see equation 2-3). In the next section, an analysis of the relative importance of

these parameters used to define the unsteady forcing will be conducted.

Figure 3-10 shows good convergence for the model with three different resolutions

or At (large time step). Since unsteady forcing is obviously more unstable than steady

forcing, it was decided to use longer model runs with a number of dimensionless time

units of 100 with the less computational demanding At of 0.05 and N = 50. This leads to


U,
S90




E 70
0


0
I 60
o
-c 50
U,

S40
0
o 30
C)
aQ
a 20




<
0
C


0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7
background dimensionlesss)










a total number of large time steps of 2000 and a total computational time of about 10

hours for each run. A compromise between computational time and widest range of

parameters needed to be achieved so a smaller number of background longshore currents

were used.

Table 3-1. Unsteady forcing simulations. Definition parameters. At = 0.05, N= 50 and #
of At = 2000.
Group amp. (a) Group freq. (co) v background
(Dimensionless) (Dimensionless) (Dimensionless)
0 -0,0.1,0.2.... 0.9, 1
0.5 0, 0.25, 0.50, 0.75, 1
1 0, 0.25, 0.50, 0.75, 1
0.25 1.5 0, 0.25, 0.50, 0.75, 1
2 0, 0.25, 0.50, 0.75, 1
2.5 0, 0.25, 0.50, 0.75, 1
0.5 0, 0.25, 0.50, 0.75, 1
1 0, 0.25, 0.50, 0.75, 1
0.5 1.5 0, 0.25, 0.50, 0.75, 1
2 0, 0.25, 0.50, 0.75, 1
2.5 0, 0.25, 0.50, 0.75, 1
0.5 0, 0.25, 0.50, 0.75, 1
1 0, 0.25, 0.50, 0.75, 1
0.75 1.5 0, 0.25, 0.50, 0.75, 1
2 0, 0.25, 0.50, 0.75, 1
2.5 0, 0.25, 0.50, 0.75, 1
0.5 0, 0.25, 0.50, 0.75, 1
1 0, 0.25, 0.50, 0.75, 1
1 1.5 0, 0.25, 0.50, 0.75, 1
2 0, 0.25, 0.50, 0.75, 1
2.5 0, 0.25, 0.50, 0.75, 1

Table 3-1 shows all the different runs that were used in the analysis. Four different

amplitudes, with five frequencies each were used with five different background

longshore current strengths ranging from 0 to 1. Also a base case with no groupiness was

used for comparison reasons. Results for this case compared well with the ones used in

the steady forcing section (smaller number of time steps and N= 100).













t = 5 a) steady

4 4

S2 2
0 0

-2 -2
-6 -4 -2 0
t=15


w2 2

0 0

-2 ---2
-6 -4 -2 0
t=25


-6 -4 -2 0
x/R


t= 10


t=20


t=30


t=5 b) unsteady t=10

4 4 g

2 2 *.
0 0

-2 -2
-6 -4 -2 0 -6 -4 -2 0


4 4 it'
t=15 t=20







-2 -2
-6 -4 -2 0 -6 -4 -2 0

t=25 t=30


-6 -4 -2 0 -6 -4 -2 0
x/R x/R


-6 -4 -2 0
x/R


Figure 3-14. Comparison of the simulations for steady and unsteady forcing with a
background longshore current of v = 0.25. Unsteady forcing with amplitude
a = 1 and frequency o) = 1


Figure 3-14 shows a comparison of the simulations for steady and unsteady forcing


with the same background longshore current. The amplitude for the unsteady case is


equal to 1, so this is the limiting case where the forcing strength changes with time from


strength 0 to 2. The figure shows a much wider spreading of the jet and higher


interactions between oppositely signed vortices. This would suggest smaller offshore


velocities in the jet since these interactions would cancel their effects, however the


strength of the vortices gets up to double during one group period, so both effects may


counteract each other. We will try to address this here. Also, it is noticeable how the


direction of the jet changes with time as the relative strength of the forcing to the


background longshore current changes. This effect resembles a hose being swung back









and forth and becomes more evident with increasing background longshore currents and

group amplitudes.

Since the behavior of the rip current is very unsteady with time the analysis will be

conducted using mean quantities (averaged over an integer number of wave periods). As

with the steady forcing cases, mean velocity fields within the area of the rip neck and

mean vorticity maps were obtained using a series of matlab routines. Comparison with

the base case (no groupiness) will be used when possible.

Velocities in the rip neck

For comparison reasons, velocities at the alongshore profile at x =-0.5 will be

used. The two basic parameters that define the unsteady forcing are the amplitude and the

group frequency. The data will be grouped together to study the effects of these

parameters separately.

Figure 3-15 shows the mean peak offshore velocities in the rip neck at the cross-

shore location x=-0.5. The different colored lines on each plot represent all the

frequencies. As could be expected, the smaller amplitudes compare better with the steady

case (black line), with the larger amplitudes separating from it. In general, the velocities

are smaller than in the steady case for smaller background longshore current strengths,

and larger for larger background longshore current strengths, resulting in a change of

shape of the steady case plot. Basically this indicates that higher amplitudes have smaller

responses to higher background longshore current strengths, therefore the periods in the

forcing where the intensity of the vortices is above 1 seem to dominate over the periods

where it is smaller than 1.












Cd,

S1.2
0
1
(,
E 0.8
0.6

- 0.4
C,
0-0.2

C
00
E

Cw,


o
7E 1
.,
E 0.8
"o
"0.6

- 0.4
(,
C- 0.2
t--^

C o
E0
E


a) amplitude = 0.25








. . . .
. . . . .. .





0 0.25 0.5 0.75 1

c) amplitude = 0.75













0 0.25 0.5 0.75 1
v dimensionlesss)


E 1.2
0
o


E 0.8
-0.6

- 0.4
(,
- 0.2
C
t--^

C 0
E



" 1.2

- 1
U,
E 0.8
"0.6

" 0.4
U,
0-0.2
E-
a 0
E


Figure 3-15. Mean peak offshore velocities in the jet at the cross-shore location x = -0.5
for different amplitudes. (-) Steady forcing, (-o-) ) = 0.5, (-o-) ) = 1, ( )
c =1.5,( ) =2 and( ) =2.5


Figure 3-15 shows some spreading on the lines on each plot, which correspond to


the different frequencies. In order to study the effect of these, the mean peak offshore


velocities in the rip neck at the cross-shore location x = -0.5 are plotted on figure 3-16


for each frequency. The different colored lines on each plot represent the different


amplitudes. The differences between the base case and the unsteady results are smaller


for the higher frequencies with higher responses for the smaller frequencies. This


behavior agrees with the results presented by Kennedy (2003), where it was determined


that for dimensionless frequencies greater than 1 the response decreases very quickly.


b) amplitude = 0.5













0 0.25 0.5 0.75 1

d) amplitude = 1

. ... . .



. . ... ... . .


...... ... ... ... ...-- -



0 0.25 0.5 0.75 1
v dimensionlesss)












a) frequency = 0.50


7 1.



E 0o.
0



CU
o






E




O)
c .:


E 0.
" 0.
S0.










0-0.
o




(U
a,
t 1-


E 0.1

" 0.


-o.


E


0 0.25 0.5 0.75 1
v dimensionlesss)


2

1

8

6

4

2
n


U,
U,
a)
-7 1.2
0
U) 1

E 0.8
o
0.6

- 0.4

0-0.2
C
) 0
E

U,
U,

0
c 1.2
o
Un 1

E 0.8
o
"-0.6
- 0.4

0-0.2

) 0
E


Figure 3-16. Mean peak offshore velocities in the jet at the cross-shore location x = -0.5
for different frequencies. (-) Steady forcing, (-o-) a = 0.25, (-o-) a = 0.5, ( )
a=0.75,( )a=l


Vorticity

Mean vorticity maps were obtained for each one of the unsteady cases with the


same resolution (boxes of 0.25 by 0.25 dimensionless units). In general, the "area of


influence" of the jet, or the areas with presence of vortices widens with increasing


amplitude. As a representative case, the vorticity maps for the case of amplitude 1 and


frequency 1 are shown on figure 3-17. This is the consequence of having vortices


strength changing from 0 to 2 over a group period resulting on the behavior described


before as a hose being swung back and forth.


0 0.25 0.5 0.75 1

d) frequency = 2.00


0 0.25 0.5 0.75 1

c) frequency = 1.50


3


ji
i


b) frequency = 1.00


0 0.25 0.5 0.75 1
v dimensionlesss)


,/


J


2

1

8


6
4

2.

0.













Measure of mean vorticity in the system

0.5 5
a) b)
4

0.25



E 3
0



-0.25

-1 /

v=/ | v = 0.25
-0.5 -2
-1 0 1 -2 -1 0 1
shore dimensionlesss) Cross shore dimensionlesss)


5 0.5

4

S3 -0.25
" 3
o /

W 0
o 0

c 0
0-
-0.25

-1

v = 0.5
-2 5 -0.5
-2 -1 0 1
Cross shore dimensionlesss)


5 0.5

4

3

2




-1
2-0.25



v = 0.75
-2' 07 -0.5
-2 -1 0 1
Cross shore dimensionlesss)


Figure 3-17. Mean vorticity maps for the unsteady case of amplitude 1 and frequency 1.
a)v 0, b)v = 0.25, c)v = 0.5 and d)v = 0.75


In order to being able to compare the relative importance of each parameter, it is


necessary, once again, to represent as many cases together as possible in plots sorted by


the different values of the parameter under study. In order to do that, alongshore vorticity


5

4
C)
C,,
S3
o
C,)
S2
E

21
0
) 0
0

-1

-2
-2
Cross


0.5




0.25



0




-0.25




-0.5









profiles were calculated and the one at the cross-shore location x = -0.5 was chosen to

be consistent with the velocity analysis. The zero vorticity crossing is a good indicator of

the location of the center of the jet and was obtained for each case. Also it was

determined the alongshore location of the -0.1 and +0.1 vorticity values as an indicator of

the width of the jet, although this value might be high for the largest background

longshore currents were offshore velocities, and therefore mean vorticity values, are

small (see appendix B).

On figure 3-18, the alongshore location of the (-0.1, 0, 0.1) values of the vorticity

(error bars) are plotted against the background longshore currents for different values of

the amplitude. The different lines on each plot represent all the frequency values.

Observing figure 3-18, it appears that the frequency has very little influence on the

location of the jet since all the different lines are very close together except for the

amplitude 1 case (figure 3-18d) and larger background longshore current, however the

location of the zero crossing becomes noisier as the longshore current increases. It is

noticeable how the width of the jet increases with increasing amplitude (larger error

bars), also the location of the positive crossing (downstream of the background longshore

current) is generally closer to the zero crossing, indicating that the vorticity gradient is

larger in the downstream side of the jet, thus inducing larger velocities on that side of the

jet (as can be seen on the mean velocity profile on figure 3-8).

Similarly, figure 3-19 shows the alongshore location of the (-0.1, 0, 0.1) values of

the vorticity plotted against the background longshore currents but for different values of

the frequency. The different lines on each plot represent all the amplitude values.











a) amplitude = 0.25


0 0.25 0.5 0.75 1

c) amplitude = 0.75


/


0 0.25 0.5 0.75 1
v dimensionlesss)


b) amplitude = 0.50





=e =-^





0 0.25 0.5 0.75 1

d) amplitude = 1


0 0.25 0.5 0.75 1
v dimensionlesss)


Figure 3-18. Alongshore location of the (-0.1, 0, 0.1) values of the vorticity at x = -0.5
with increasing longshore current for each amplitude. (-x-)o = 0.5, (-x-)
o =1,(-x-) co =1.5,( ) o=2 and( ) o =2.5

From figure 3-19 it can be inferred that the location of the zero vorticity crossing

(location of the jet) for the larger longshore current strengths has a dependence on the

group amplitude, with the jet being pushed farther downstream for the lower amplitudes.

This reinforces the fact that the periods during which the forcing is higher than 1

dominate over the ones where it is smaller than 1, as concluded for the offshore velocity

profiles. Although the frequency has a smaller influence on the location of the jet, the

cases for higher frequencies on figure 3-19 show less separation from the steady forcing

case.


Arr










a) frequency = 0.5


0 0.25 0.5 0.75 1

c) frequency = 1.5


0 0.25 0.5 0.75 1
v dimensionlesss)


0 0.25 0.5 0.75 1

d) frequency = 2










0 0.25 0.5 0.75 1
v dimensionlesss)


Figure 3-19. Alongshore location of the (-0.1, 0, 0.1) values of the vorticity at x = -0.5
with increasing longshore current for each frequency. (-x-) Steady forcing,
(-x-) a = 0.25, (-x-) a = 0.5, ( ) a = 0.75 and( )

Figure 3-20 shows the mean location and width of the jet as defined before but

plotted against increasing group amplitudes. It shows that for larger values of the

amplitude and the background longshore current the jet is not pushed downstream as

much, as stated before, and that for the smaller longshore currents the amplitude has no

influence. The background longshore current is the predominant factor on the location of

the jet.


b) frequency = 1










a) frequency = 0.5


c) frequency = 1.5


0 0.25 0.5 0.75 1
a dimensionlesss)


0 0.25 0.5 0.75 1

d) frequency = 2


0 0.25 0.5 0.75 1
a dimensionlesss)


Figure 3-20. Alongshore location of the (-0.1, 0, 0.1) values of the vorticity at x = -0.5
with increasing group amplitude for each frequency. (-x-) v = 0, (-x-)
v = 0.25, (-x-) v= 0.5, ( ) v= 0.75 and( ) v=1

Figure 3-21 shows that frequency has almost no influence on the location of the jet.

For the higher values of the frequency and amplitude some of the zero crossing are

missing in the figure, this is due to the fact that along the alongshore profile at the cross-

shore location x = -0.5 the vorticity is always negative and never becomes positive. This

indicates that the jet is parallel to the shoreline. Figure 3-22 shows one of these cases

where the jet, defined by the oppositely signed vorticity on either side is completely

parallel to the shore.


b) frequency = 1







52



a) amplitude = 0.25 b) amplitude = 0.5
2.5 2.5
i' 2 2
a) a)
7 1.5 C 1.5
o o
C 1
E 0.5 E 0.5

0-
T0 T 0-- T T T T5
-0.5 -0.5


0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5

c) amplitude = 0.75
2.5 2.5
2' 2 2' 2
U) 0)
- 1.5. 1.5
U 1 1
go1 Ii ,=1, -i1,1
E 0.5 E 0.5

T T T T 0
_n cl __ ___ ___ ___ __ _n c


0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5

d) amplitude = 1



T
T T



T-T-T-T-T


0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5
f dimensionlesss) f dimensionlesss)


Figure 3-21. Alongshore location of the (-0.1, 0, 0.1) values of the vorticity at x = -0.5
with increasing group frequency for each amplitude. (-x-) v = 0, (-x-)
v = 0.25, (-x-) v = 0.5, ( ) v= 0.75 and( ) v=1

Although it seems like for these cases cross-shore velocities in the jet should be

almost zero, this does not agree completely with the results obtained with the velocity

profiles where a small residual offshore current remains for the same cases. However, the

mean peak offshore velocities calculated at the cross-shore location x = -0.5 have a peak

in the rip neck area before the jet is turned parallel to the shore while going around the

downstream fixed source of vorticity (see figure 3-22).















Measure of mean vorticity in the system
averaged over 14 group periods
5 0.5


4- I


0.25


-2'
-2 -1 0 1
Cross shore coord. dimensionlesss)


10


-0.25





-0.5


Figure 3-22. Mean vorticity map for the unsteady forcing case with: a = 1, o = 1.5 and
v = 0.75














CHAPTER 4
SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS

A simplified conceptual representation of a rip current system was used to study the

effects of longshore currents on rip currents. Rip currents are part of a very complex

circulation system within the near shore, where many different processes interact with

each other. By focusing on the rip neck area, where generation of circulation and vorticity

was assumed to be the main physical process, a simplified representation of a rip current

was achieved.

The numerical model used for this study (discussed in detail in chapter 2), first

introduced by Kennedy (2003), is based on a generation of vorticity approach, where

oppositely signed vortices are continuously released on either side of the rip channel and

let free in the system. Flat bed and essentially no energy dissipation (no bottom friction,

no wave-current interaction) are assumed in the model. Since generation of vorticity is

the only physical process represented in the model, its applicability is strictly limited to

the rip neck area, where this process is assumed to be dominant. A constant background

longshore current was added to the model to study its effects on the generated jet-like rip

current. Both steady and unsteady forcing were used. A wide range of unsteady forcing

parameters were used in conjunction with a number of increasing background longshore

current strengths.

There are three parameters that define the model. A mean rate of generation of

circulation which depends mainly in the strength of wave breaking and the local

topography (DF/Dt), the semi-gap width of the rip channel (R) and the constant









background longshore current (v). Scaling of the different processes is very

straightforward. Velocities in the rip neck depend on the strength of wave breaking,

scaling with (DF/Dt)2, but not on the gap width (R). Temporal response will depend

both on wave breaking strength and length scales (R/(DF Dt)Y ).

The model was tested against measured laboratory data in the first section of

chapter 3. Two datasets were available, both from experiments conducted at the Center

for Applied Coastal Research of the University of Delaware. The experimental setup

consisted of a fixed topography of a barred beach with rip channels. In order to scale

measured velocities in the experiments, estimates of the scaling parameter (DF/Dt)

where obtained using two different methodologies proposed by Brocchini et al. (2003).

The first methodology, based on breaking assumptions over the bar uses offshore wave

data and water depth at the bar crest as inputs. The second methodology uses local

measured wave heights and setups. It was found that the first methodology over estimates

the generation of circulation by a factor of two as compared to the second methodology

(see figure 3-5), which was believed to be more accurate since it uses local measured

data. On the other hand, the first methodology could easily be applied to field data since

offshore wave measurements and water depth at the bar crest are easy to obtain, whereas

obtaining local setup measurements is very complicated.

The model predicted quite well the trend of the data, although it seemed to over

predict velocities in the rip neck. This was attributed to the difficulty in determining the

relative cross-shore location of the measuring points with respect to the generation of

vorticity in the surf zone. Also, the estimations of the mean rate of generation of

circulation are probably high since the methodologies applied consider the maximum









possible generation of circulation (ignoring any breaking in the channel). Ignored

physical processes like wave-current interaction, 3D effects or bottom friction are

probably not negligible. This could be adjusted with a parameter to decrease predicted

velocities.

In the second section of chapter 3, the model was used to study the effects of

longshore currents on rip currents, using both steady and unsteady forcing. Velocity

fields and mean vorticity maps within the rip channel area were used in the analysis. The

introduction of a background longshore current in the systems was found to have

dramatic effects on the rip current behavior (see figures 3-10). The mean peak offshore

velocities within the jet are approximately constant for small background dimensionless

longshore currents (v < 0.3) but decrease quickly once the relative strength of the

longshore current becomes stronger (v > 0.3). This was found to be due to the mixing of

oppositely signed vortices from either side of the rip once the current became strong

enough to push the upstream vortices into the downstream vortices, canceling their

effects. This can be observed in figures 3-11 and 3-12.

The angle of the jet was estimated using the direction of the velocities with the 1/3

highest offshore component of velocity at the dimensionless location x = -0.5. The jet

angle, relative to the shore normal, became almost 80 degrees for dimensionless

longshore current strengths of 1, but would be expected to be around 45 degrees (figure

3-13) since offshore velocities and background longshore current scale the same way.

This is another indicator of the strong effect of the longshore current on the rip current.

A wide range of values was used to test the relative importance of the parameters

defining the unsteady forcing (amplitude and frequency) with increasing background









longshore current strengths. Unsteady forcing resulted in a very unsteady behavior of the

rip current orjet (see figure 3-14), thus only mean quantities could be studied.

Mean peak offshore velocities in the jet were found to be mainly dependent on the

strength of the background longshore current (see figures 3-15 and 3-16). Higher

amplitudes (of unsteady forcing) were found to have smaller responses to higher

background longshore current strengths, therefore the periods in the forcing where the

intensity of the vortices is above 1 seem to dominate over the periods where it is smaller

than 1. For dimensionless frequencies greater than 1 the response was very small. This

agrees with the results presented by Kennedy (2003).

The alongshore location of the jet along a mean vorticity profile at x = -0.5 was

determined by the zero vorticity crossing and estimations of the jet width were obtained

by the locations of -0.1 and 0.1 mean vorticity values. The location of the jet was found

to be mainly dependent on the strength of the background longshore current. Higher

values of the group amplitude resulted in a smaller displacement of the jet downstream

(figure 3-20), supporting the argument that the periods during which the forcing is higher

than 1 dominate over the ones where it is smaller than 1. The frequency was found to

have almost no influence on the jet location (figure 3-21). The jet narrows for stronger

background currents as the flow is confined closer to the downstream source of vorticity.

Higher amplitudes induce wider mean jet widths (figure 3-20) although its influence is

very small compared to the background longshore current.

Despite the high simplicity of the model, it has proven to obtain very reasonable

results in comparison with measured data from laboratory experiments. The main

challenge to apply the results of the model in the field is the estimation of the model






58


parameter (DF/Dt); however if the model were used as a predictive tool the

methodologies used in this thesis would give predictions on the safe side.

For future research, the model results could be coupled with existing rip current

forecasting indexes as a predictive tool. Further comparison with laboratory and field

data would be desired, especially with longshore current data.


















APPENDIX A
MEAN VORTICITY MAPS


Measure of mean vorticity in the system


0.25



0



-0.25



-0.5


Cross shore dimensionlesss)


5 0.5
c)


S0.25
O0

2
0)
o1 \


0 -0.25

-1

v = 45
-2 L' -0.5
-2 -1 0 1
Cross shore dimensionlesss)


Cross shore dimensionlesss)


5 .0.5

4





c-



0
E -0.25

<
-1
IC -0.25



v = 0.75
-2 -0.5
-2 -1 0 1
Cross shore dimensionlesss)


Figure A-1. Mean vorticity map for steady forcing. a)v = 0, b)v = 0.25, c)v = 0.5 and
d)v= 0.75


0.5



0.25



0



-0.25



-0.5













Measure of mean vorticity in the system


0.25




0




-0.25




-0.5


Cross shore dimensionlesss)


5 0.5


4

S0.25
0

2
E
. ,, ...... .
.s .- J...
-0
S 1
-o

a -0.25
o
<-1

v=0.5
-2 1-0.5
-2 -1 0 1
Cross shore dimensionlesss)


5
b)
4

.o
C-





0) -
o






0


-1


-2 -1 0 1
Cross shore dimensionlesss)


C,
S3
0
C)
S2
E
-a
2 1
0
-c
) 0
o
0


-2' I 1-
-2 -1 0 1
Cross shore dimensionlesss)


Figure A-2. Mean vorticity maps for unsteady forcing with amplitude 0.25 and frequency
0.5. a)v = 0, b)v = 0.25, c)v = 0.5 and d)v = 0.75


0.5




0.25




0




-0.25




-0.5






0.5




0.25




0




-0.25




-0.5













Measure of mean vorticity in the system


0.25




0




-0.25




-0.5


Cross shore dimensionlesss)


5 0.5


4

2 0.25
3
0
,-,
2
E
, .. I 0


0

-0.25
o
<-1

v = 0.5
-2- v 05 -0.5
-2 -1 0 1
Cross shore dimensionlesss)


5
4 b)
4


o
C,-
2
E



C,-

o
0 -

-1

v = 0.250
-2
-2 -1 0 1
Cross shore dimensionlesss)


I9,
C,
S3
0
C,
2
E

21
o
0
) 0
to
<


-2' -i
-2 -1 0 1
Cross shore dimensionlesss)


Figure A-3. Mean vorticity maps for unsteady forcing with amplitude 0.25 and frequency
1. a)v= 0, b)v= 0.25, c)v= 0.5 and d)v = 0.75


0.5




0.25




0




-0.25




-0.5






0.5




0.25




0




-0.25




-0.5













Measure of mean vorticity in the system


0.25




0




-0.25




-0.5


Cross shore dimensionlesss)


5 0.5


-C)

S3 0.25
S3

2
E

o 1 .--
0
e--

o
1-1

v = 0.5
-2- 1-0.5
-2 -1 0 1
Cross shore dimensionlesss)


5
b)
4

.o



E-
3






o


2-1

v = 0.25
-2
-2 -1 0 1
Cross shore dimensionlesss)


0
- 3
o
2
E


0

a
0
to
<


-2' 1-
-2 -1 0 1
Cross shore dimensionlesss)


Figure A-4. Mean vorticity maps for unsteady forcing with amplitude 0.25 and frequency
1.5. a)v= 0, b)v= 0.25, c)v= 0.5 and d)v = 0.75


0.5




0.25




0




-0.25




-0.5






0.5




0.25




0




-0.25




-0.5













Measure of mean vorticity in the system


0.25




0




-0.25




-0.5


Cross shore dimensionlesss)


5 0.5
C)
4-

2 \ 0.25
3-
o
21
E 0



, 0 I 0 0
-\ -0.25

<-1

v = 0.5
-2 0- 1-0.5
-2 -1 0 1
Cross shore dimensionlesss)


5
b)
4


3


o 1








v = 0.25
2






-1 <


v = 0.25
-2
-2 -1 0 1
Cross shore dimensionlesss)


I9,
C,
- 3


2
E

21
o
v,
0
0) 0
0
o
<


-2' -i
-2 -1 0 1
Cross shore dimensionlesss)


Figure A-5. Mean vorticity maps for unsteady forcing with amplitude 0.25 and frequency
2. a)v= 0, b)v= 0.25, c)v= 0.5 and d)v = 0.75


0.5




0.25




0




-0.25




-0.5






0.5




0.25




0




-0.25




-0.5













Measure of mean vorticity in the system


0.25




0




-0.25




-0.5


Cross shore dimensionlesss)


5 0.5




S0.25
' 3 -
.0
a -

2
E



0 I .'
21

0
o
a0 -0.25
<-1

v = 0.5
-2- 1-0.5
-2 -1 0 1
Cross shore dimensionlesss)


5
b)



3
o

2




0
E


<-I-
-O




v = 0.25
-2
-2 -1 0 1
Cross shore dimensionlesss)


I9
(,
S3


2
E

e-
0
S1
o

a
0
<


-2' I -
-2 -1 0 1
Cross shore dimensionlesss)


Figure A-6. Mean vorticity maps for unsteady forcing with amplitude 0.25 and frequency
2.5. a)v = 0, b)v = 0.25, c)v = 0.5 and d)v = 0.75


0.5




0.25




0




-0.25




-0.5






0.5




0.25




0




-0.25




-0.5













Measure of mean vorticity in the system


0.25




0




-0.25




-0.5


Cross shore dimensionlesss)


5 0.5


4

S3 0.25


2
0


0)
I 0 -- /


-0.25

-1

V = 0.5
-2 v 0.5 -0.5
-2 -1 0 1
Cross shore dimensionlesss)


b)
4
V
S3
0
o
a "

2-




0 0
e--
Co

<--- /

v = 0.25
-2
-2 -1 0 1
Cross shore dimensionlesss)


If9
- 3
o
2
E


0
-c

0
o
<


-2' I 1-
-2 -1 0 1
Cross shore dimensionlesss)


Figure A-7. Mean vorticity maps for unsteady forcing with amplitude 0.50 and frequency
0.5. a)v = 0, b)v = 0.25, c)v = 0.5 and d)v = 0.75


0.5




0.25




0




-0.25




-0.5






0.5




0.25




0




-0.25




-0.5













Measure of mean vorticity in the system


0.25




0




-0.25




-0.5


Cross shore dimensionlesss)


5 0.5


- 4

S3 0.25
, 3
0
o I

2-
E
-) 00


0
1' -0.25
o

-1

v=0.5
-2 -0.5
-2 -1 0 1
Cross shore dimensionlesss)


5
4 b)
-4


a 3
S2
2
E

1

i 0

S-1

v = 0.25
-2
-2 -1 0 1
Cross shore dimensionlesss)


S3
o
CO
2
E
e-
2 1
0
-c
o) 0
o
<


-2' I 1-
-2 -1 0 1
Cross shore dimensionlesss)


Figure A-8. Mean vorticity maps for unsteady forcing with amplitude 0.50 and frequency
1. a)v= 0, b)v= 0.25, c)v= 0.5 and d)v = 0.75


0.5




0.25




0




-0.25




-0.5






0.5




0.25




0




-0.25




-0.5













Measure of mean vorticity in the system


0.25




0




-0.25




-0.5


Cross shore dimensionlesss)


5 0.5
C)
4

S3 0.25


S2
E
,0
S 1-
0



-1

v=0.5
-2 -0.5
-2 -1 0 1
Cross shore dimensionlesss)


5
b)
4


C 3


2E
E


o
v-




0

-1


-2
-2 -1 0 1
Cross shore dimensionlesss)


(9
- 3
0
V,
2
E

S1
0

0) 0
o
<


-2' -i
-2 -1 0 1
Cross shore dimensionlesss)


Figure A-9. Mean vorticity maps for unsteady forcing with amplitude 0.50 and frequency
1.5. a)v= 0, b)v= 0.25, c)v= 0.5 and d)v = 0.75


0.5




0.25




0




-0.25




-0.5






0.5




0.25




0




-0.25




-0.5













Measure of mean vorticity in the system


a)


-2
-2 -1 0 1
Cross shore dimensionlesss)




5
C)
4--


3-
0

2
E




o


I -1

v = 0.5
-2--
-2 -1 0 1
Cross shore dimensionlesss)


-0.25




-0.5


0.5




0.25




0




-0.25




-0.5


5
b)
4
C,)

0
C,)
c3





o



-1


v = 0.25
-2
-2 -1 0 1
Cross shore dimensionlesss)


.,,
C,
- 3
0
If)
2
E

21

v,
0
0

<


-2' -i
-2 -1 0 1
Cross shore dimensionlesss)


Figure A-10. Mean vorticity maps for unsteady forcing with amplitude 0.50 and
frequency 2. a)v = 0, b)v = 0.25, c)v = 0.5 and d)v = 0.75


0.5




0.25




0




-0.25




-0.5






0.5




0.25




0




-0.25




-0.5













Measure of mean vorticity in the system


a)









-


-2
-2 -1 0 1
Cross shore dimensionlesss)




5
C)
4-




2
E
-, I .
21

--
0


0 -1

v = 0.5
-2
-2 -1 0 1
Cross shore dimensionlesss)


-0.25




-0.5


0.5




0.25




0




-0.25




-0.5


5
b)
4

3
C,,
2
E
-



-1
0
C,
t- -'



v = 0.25
-2
-2 -1 0 1
Cross shore dimensionlesss)


C,
V,
S3
0
V,
2
E


o
0
0) 0

<


-2' -i
-2 -1 0 1
Cross shore dimensionlesss)


Figure A-11. Mean vorticity maps for unsteady forcing with amplitude 0.50 and
frequency 2.5. a)v = 0, b)v = 0.25, c)v = 0.5 and d)v = 0.75


0.5




0.25




0




-0.25




-0.5






0.5




0.25




0




-0.25




-0.5













Measure of mean vorticity in the system


0.25




0




-0.25




-0.5


Cross shore dimensionlesss)


5 0.5
C)
4 C)

S30.25
S3





S 1 -
E2




0


-1

v = 0.5
-2 -0.5
-2 -1 0 1
Cross shore dimensionlesss)


5
b)



3

2
E

0






v = 0.25
-2



-2 -1 0 1

Cross shore dimensionlesss)
05'
Co \ .^
to0X


V,
S3


0
o


ii
t-


21
0
<-
o

<


-2' -1
-2 -1 0 1
Cross shore dimensionlesss)


Figure A-12. Mean vorticity maps for unsteady forcing with amplitude 0.75 and
frequency 0.5. a)v = 0, b)v = 0.25, c)v = 0.5 and d)v = 0.75


0.5




0.25




0




-0.25




-0.5






0.5




0.25




0




-0.25




-0.5













Measure of mean vorticity in the system


a)


-2
-2 -1 0 1
Cross shore dimensionlesss)




5
C
4-


c 3
o I

2-
E


0--


0
< -1

v = 0.5
-2
-2 -1 0 1
Cross shore dimensionlesss)


-0.25




-0.5


0.5




0.25




0




-0.25




-0.5


5
Sb)
4C,


o



-19
Cv
2
E
0) 0 .


C,-
0

-1


-2
-2 -1 0 1
Cross shore dimensionlesss)


If)
C,
- 3
o
V)
2
E

21
o
0v
0


-2' -i
-2 -1 0 1
Cross shore dimensionlesss)


Figure A-13. Mean vorticity maps for unsteady forcing with amplitude 0.75 and
frequency 1. a)v = 0, b)v = 0.25, c)v = 0.5 and d)v = 0.75


0.5




0.25




0




-0.25




-0.5






0.5




0.25




0




-0.25




-0.5













Measure of mean vorticity in the system


a)


-2 --
-2 -1 0 1
Cross shore dimensionlesss)




5

C)
4-


3 -


2
E




0
0




-2 v = 0.5
-2
-2 -1 0 1
Cross shore dimensionlesss)


-0.25




-0.5


0.5




0.25




0




-0.25




-0.5


5
b)




o.

2
E





o
0)
e--







-1

v = 0.25
-2
-2 -1 0 1
Cross shore dimensionlesss)


C,
V,
S3
0
,0
2
E

21

v,
0
t-


o
0


-2' -i
-2 -1 0 1
Cross shore dimensionlesss)


Figure A-14. Mean vorticity maps for unsteady forcing with amplitude 0.75 and
frequency 1.5. a)v = 0, b)v = 0.25, c)v = 0.5 and d)v = 0.75


0.5




0.25




0




-0.25




-0.5







0.5




0.25




0




-0.25




-0.5


--













Measure of mean vorticity in the system


0.25




0




-0.25




-0.5


Cross shore dimensionlesss)


-2L' -
-2 -1 0 1
Cross shore dimensionlesss)


0.25




0




-0.25




-0.5


5
b)
4




2





0
o

-1

v = 0.25
-2
-2 -1 0
Cross shore dimensionlesss)
-2'------

Cross shore dimensionlesss)


S3
o
2





0) 0
E
a


Co
v
0
t-
t-
O


-2' I 1-
-2 -1 0 1
Cross shore dimensionlesss)


Figure A-15. Mean vorticity maps for unsteady forcing with amplitude 0.75 and
frequency 2. a)v = 0, b)v = 0.25, c)v = 0.5 and d)v = 0.75


0.5




0.25




0




-0.25




-0.5






0.5




0.25




0




-0.25




-0.5













Measure of mean vorticity in the system


0.25




0




-0.25




-0.5


Cross shore dimensionlesss)


5 I 0.5


S4

S \ 0.25
o
3-
a 2
E
-a0
1
0

o

-1-
a0 -0.25



v = 0.5
-2 v- 1-0.5
-2 -1 0 1
Cross shore dimensionlesss)


5
b)
4


.0
c3


E I


t-
o0
v-
a0
<-17


v = 0.25
-2
-2 -1 0 1
Cross shore dimensionlesss)


S3


o
o
E


0
Co
a
0


-2' I 1-
-2 -1 0 1
Cross shore dimensionlesss)


Figure A-16. Mean vorticity maps for unsteady forcing with amplitude 0.75 and
frequency 2.5. a)v = 0, b)v = 0.25, c)v = 0.5 and d)v = 0.75


0.5




0.25




0




-0.25




-0.5






0.5




0.25




0




-0.25




-0.5













Measure of mean vorticity in the system


0.25




0




-0.25




-0.5


Cross shore dimensionlesss)


5 0.5
c)
4

. 3 0.25
o

2-
E

-O 0


o -0.25

-1
v = 0.5
-2 v = 0.-0.5
-2 -1 0 1
Cross shore dimensionlesss)


5
b)
4 C


- 3
"e 3-- ^




1 0
o







0
5 ---' i| J

-1


-1

v = 0.25
-2
-2 -1 0 1
Cross shore dimensionlesss)


I.)
S3
0


o
2
E

e-
0
-c
o

0
<


-2' -
-2 -1 0 1
Cross shore dimensionlesss)


Figure A-17. Mean vorticity maps for unsteady forcing with amplitude 1 and frequency
0.5. a)v = 0, b)v = 0.25, c)v = 0.5 and d)v = 0.75


0.5




0.25




0




-0.25




-0.5






0.5




0.25




0




-0.25




-0.5













Measure of mean vorticity in the system


0.25




0




-0.25




-0.5


Cross shore dimensionlesss)


5 0.5


4-

.B 0.25
Co 1
O y

1 2 I


21
o


0
-1

v = 0.5
-2 -0.5
-2 -1 0 1
Cross shore dimensionlesss)


5




.o_
S 3
0 2








-21 .. --1 0 1
-"
o0


-1

v = 0.25
-2
-2 -1 0 1
Cross shore dimensionlesss)


C,
- 3
0
V-
2



o
E
v-

0
V-

Co
a
0


-2' -
-2 -1 0 1
Cross shore dimensionlesss)


Figure A-18. Mean vorticity maps for unsteady forcing with amplitude 1 and frequency
1. a)v= 0, b)v= 0.25, c)v= 0.5 and d)v = 0.75


0.5




0.25




0




-0.25




-0.5






0.5




0.25




0




-0.25




-0.5













Measure of mean vorticity in the system


0.25




0




-0.25




-0.5


Cross shore dimensionlesss)


5 0.5


4-

. I 0.25
- 3
SIII
2
E

00
0




-1

v = 0.5
-2 -0.5
-2 -1 0 1
Cross shore dimensionlesss)


5
b)
4


- 3
o
C-
C,
S2
E

1-
e--
o

0


-1

v = 0.25
-2
-2 -1 0 1
Cross shore dimensionlesss)


- 3


E

S2
o
v
0
)-
o
<


-2' I 1-
-2 -1 0 1
Cross shore dimensionlesss)


Figure A-19. Mean vorticity maps for unsteady forcing with amplitude 1 and frequency
1.5. a)v= 0, b)v= 0.25, c)v= 0.5 and d)v = 0.75


0.5




0.25




0




-0.25




-0.5






0.5




0.25




0




-0.25




-0.5













Measure of mean vorticity in the system


0.25




0




-0.25




-0.5


Cross shore dimensionlesss)


-21' -
-2 -1 0 1
Cross shore dimensionlesss)


0.25




0




-0.25




-0.5


5
b)
4

0
- 3
o

2-


1
0




-2



-2 -1 0 1
Cross shore dimensionlesss)
-1

v = 0.25
-2
-2 -1 0
Cross shore dimensionlesss)


S3


0
0)


2

o

a
0
0
V-

_o
<


-2' -1
-2 -1 0 1
Cross shore dimensionlesss)


Figure A-20. Mean vorticity maps for unsteady forcing with amplitude 1 and frequency
2. a)v= 0, b)v= 0.25, c)v= 0.5 and d)v = 0.75


0.5




0.25




0




-0.25




-0.5






0.5




0.25




0




-0.25




-0.5













Measure of mean vorticity in the system


0.25




0




-0.25




-0.5


Cross shore dimensionlesss)


5 0.5


4

Sv 0.25
3
0

2 0
E
0
21
o

-0.25



v = 0.5
-2 0 1-0.5
-2 -1 0 1
Cross shore dimensionlesss)


5
b)
4
Co
.o_
. 3
0

2-
E


0-1





v = 0.25
-2
-2 -1 0 1
Cross shore dimensionlesss)


If9
S3

0 2
E


0
S-
o

0
c-
o
<


-2' -
-2 -1 0 1
Cross shore dimensionlesss)


Figure A-21. Mean vorticity maps for unsteady forcing with amplitude 1 and frequency
2.5. a)v = 0, b)v = 0.25, c)v = 0.5 and d)v = 0.75


0.5




0.25




0




-0.25




-0.5






0.5




0.25




0




-0.25




-0.5















APPENDIX B
LOCATION AND WIDTH OF THE JET DATA

The following tables contain the alongshore locations of the vorticity values used in

figures in chapter 3 to define location (zero vorticity crossing) and width ([-0.1,0.1]

vorticity values) of the jet. All quantities are dimensionless and were obtained from the

mean vorticity maps of each case (see Appendix A).

Table B-1. Alongshore location and width of the jet for steady forcing
No groupiness cases
v y- yO y+
0 -0.38 0 0.4
0.25 0.89 0.93 0.96
0.5 1.1 1.14 1.21
0.75 1.33 1.59
1 1.97













Table B-2. Alongshore location and width of the jet for unsteady forcing with amplitude
0.25
f=0.5 f=1.0
v yO y+ y- yO y+
0 -0.4 0 0.38 -0.4 0 0.35
0.25 0.88 0.92 0.96 0.91 0.97 1.01
0.5 1.03 1.06 1.1 1.03 1.08 1.13
0.75 1.31 1.37 1.52 1.23 1.36 1.44
1 1.86 1.83
f=1.5 f=2.0
v y- yO y+ y- yO y+
0 -0.39 0 0.39 -0.38 0 0.39
0.25 0.89 0.94 0.98 0.89 0.94 0.97
0.5 1.03 1.07 1.11 1.02 1.06 1.1
0.75 1.27 1.34 1.45 1.29 1.36 1.47
1 1.7 1.68
f=2.5
v y- yO y+
0 -0.4 0 0.36
0.25 0.9 0.95 1
0.5 1.05 1.09 1.13
0.75 1.3 1.36 1.5
1 1.67










Table B-3. Alongshore location and width of the jet for unsteady forcing with amplitude


f=0.5 f=1.0
v yO y+ y- yO y+
0 -0.36 0 0.4 -0.39 0 0.4
0.25 0.79 0.9 0.96 0.88 0.98 1.04
0.5 1 1.05 1.1 0.93 1.03 1.1
0.75 1.24 1.31 1.37 1.13 1.27 1.36
1 1.68 1.6
f=1.5 f=2.0
v yO y+ y- yO y+
0 -0.39 0 0.37 -0.38 0 0.37
0.25 0.89 0.95 1 0.88 0.93 0.98
0.5 1.02 1.06 1.11 1.01 1.04 1.08
0.75 1.15 1.29 1.42 1.32 1.46
1 1.56 1.59
f=2.5
v y- yO y+
0 -0.38 0 0.38
0.25 0.89 0.94 1
0.5 1.05 1.1 1.18
0.75 1.3 1.38 1.64
1 1.53










Table B-4. Alongshore location and width of the jet for unsteady forcing with amplitude
0.75
f=0.5 f=1.0
v yO y+ y- yO y+
0 -0.39 0 0.41 -0.4 0 0.39
0.25 0.6 0.82 0.91 0.8 0.94 1.02
0.5 0.92 1.03 1.08 0.92 1.03 1.11
0.75 1.11 1.24 1.33 1.04 1.2 1.34
1 1.56 1.4
f=1.5 f=2.0
v yO y+ y- yO y+
0 -0.39 0 0.39 -0.39 0 0.38
0.25 0.86 0.93 0.99 0.87 0.93 0.99
0.5 1.04 1.09 1.14 1 1.04 1.08
0.75 1.22 1.35 1.35
1 1.4 1.68
f=2.5
v y- yO y+
0 -0.39 0 0.38
0.25 0.84 0.92 0.99
0.5 1.08 1.12 1.23
0.75 1.29 1.37 1.63
1 1.56










Table B-5. Alongshore location and width of the jet for unsteady forcing with amplitude


f=0.5 f=1.0
v yO y+ y- yO y+
0 -0.41 0 0.4 -0.4 0 0.42
0.25 0.39 0.72 0.84 0.61 0.88 0.98
0.5 0.87 1.01 1.07 1.01 1.09 1.61
0.75 1.04 1.15 1.26 1.16
1 1.3 1.38 1.56 1.33
f=1.5 f=2.0
v yO y+ y- yO y+
0 -0.41 0 0.41 -0.41 0 0.42
0.25 0.8 0.9 0.96 0.81 0.9 0.96
0.5 1.11 1.22 1.36 1.01 1.05 1.09
0.75 1.36 1.44
1 1.34 1.43
f=2.5
v y- yO y+
0 -0.39 0 0.44
0.25 0.82 0.88 0.97
0.5 1.12 1.29 1.44
0.75 1.29 1.42 1.7
1















LIST OF REFERENCES

Aagaard, T., B. Greenwood, and J. Nielson, 1997, Mean currents and sediment transport
in a rip channel, Mar. Geol., 140, pp. 25-45.

Bowen, A. J., 1969, Rip currents, 1. Theoretical investigations. Journal of Geophysical
Research, 74, pp. 5467-5478.

Bowen, A. J., D. I. Inman, 1969, Rip currents, 2. Laboratory and field investigations.
Journal of Geophysical Research, 74(23), pp. 5479-5490.

Bowman, D., D. Arad, D.S. Rosen, E. Kit, R. Goldbery, and A. Slavicz, 1988, Flow
characteristics along the rip current system under low-energy conditions. Marine
Geology, 79, pp. 149-167.

Brander, R. W., 1999, Field observations on morphodynamic evolution of a low-energy
rip current system. Marine Geology, 157(3-4), pp. 199-217.

Brander, R. W, and A. D. Short, 2000, Morphodynamics of a large-scale rip current at
Muriwai Beach, New Zealand. Marine Geology, 165, pp. 27-39.

Brander, R. W., A. D. Short, 2001, Flow kinematics of low-enegy rip current systems. J.
Coast. Res., 17(2), pp. 468-481.

Brocchini, M., A. B. Kennedy, L. Soldini, and A. Mancinelli, 2004, Topographically-
controlled, breaking wave-induced macrovortices. Part 1. Widely separated
breakwaters, J. Fluid Mech., in press.

Buhler, O., 2000, On the vorticity transport due to dissipating or breaking waves n
shallow-water flow, J. Fluid Mech., 407, pp. 235-263.

Btihler, O., and T. E. Jacobson, 2001, Wave-driven currents and vortex dynamics on
barred beaches, J. Fluid Mech., 449, pp. 313-339.

Chandramohan, P., V. S. Kumar, B. K. Jena, 1997, Rip current zones along the beaches
in Goa, west coast of India, J. Waterway, Port, Coast., and Ocean. Eng., 123(6),
pp.322-328.

Chen, Q., R. A. Dalrymple, J. T. Kirby, A. B. Kennedy, and M. C. Haller, 1999,
Boussinesq modeling of a rip current system, J. Geophys. Res., 104, pp. 20,617-
20,637.






86


Cooke, D. O., 1970, The occurrence and geological work of rip currents off the coast of
southern California. Marine Geology, 9, pp. 173-186.

Dalrymple, R. A., 1975, A mechanism for rip current generation on an open coast, J.
Geophys. Res., 80(24), pp. 3485-3487.

Dalrymple, R. A., 1978, Rip currents and their causes, Proc. of 16th Conf. on Coast. Eng.,
Hamburg, Vol. II, pp. 1414-1427.

Dalrymple, R. A., C. J. Lozano, 1978, Wave-current interaction models for rip currents,
J. Geophys. Res., 83, pp. 6063-6071.

Davis, W. M., 1925, The Undertow, Science, Vol. LXII, pp. 206-208.

Dean, R. G., and R. A. Dalrymple, 1984, Water wave mechanics for engineers and
scientists, Prentice-Hall, Old Tappan, NJ, USA

Dronen, N., H. Karunarathna, J. Fredsoe, B. M. Sumer, and R. Deigaard, 1999, The
circulation over a longshore bar with rip channels, Proc. Coast. Sed., New York,
pp. 576-587.

Dronen, N., H. Karunarathna, J. Fredsoe, B. M. Sumer, R. Deigaard, 2002, An
experimental study of rip channel flow, J. Coast. Eng., 45, pp. 223-238.

Falques, A., A. Montoto, D. Vila, 1999, A note on hydrodynamic instabilities, and
horizontal circulation in the surfzone, J. Geophys. Res., 104(20), pp. 605-620.

Haas, K. A., 2002, Laboratory measurements of the vertical structure of rip currents, J.
Geophysical Research-Oceans, 107 (C5), Art. No. 3047.

Hass, K. A., I. A. Svendsen, and M. C. Haller, 1998, Numerical modeling of nearshore
circulations on a barred beach with rip channels, Proc. 26th Conf On Coastal Eng.,
ASCE, Copenaghen.

Haller, M. C., R. A. Dalrymple, I. A. Svendsen, 1997, Rip channels and nearshore
circulation, Proc. Coast. Dyn., Plymouth, U.K., pp. 594-603.

Haller, M. C., R. A. Dalrymple, 1999, Rip current dynamics and nearshore circulation,
Center for Applied Coast. Res., Res. Rep. # CACR-99-05, pp. 1-144.

Haller, M. C., R. A. Dalrymple, 2001, Rip current instabilities, J. Fluid Mech., 433, pp.
161-192.

Haller, M. C., R. A. Dalrymple, I. A. Svendsen, 2002, Experimental study of nearshore
dynamics on a barred beach with rip channels, J. Geophys. Res.-Oceans, 107 (C6)
Art. No. 3061






87


Hamm, L., 1992, Directional nearshore wave propagation over a rip channel: an
experiment, Proc. Intl. Conf. Coast. Eng., New York, pp. 226-239.

Harris, T. F. W., 1961, The nearshore circulation of water, CSIR Symp. S2, South Africa,
pp. 18-31

Harris, T. F. W., 1964, A qualitative study of the nearshore circulation off a Natal beach
with a submerged longshore sand bar, M. Sc. Thesis, University of Natal, Durban,
South Africa

Hino, M., 1975, Theory of the formation of rip-current and cuspidal coast, Proc. 14th Int.
Coastal Eng. Conf., Copenhagen, ASCE press, pp. 901-919.

Holland, K. T., R. A. Holman, T. C. Lippmann, 1997, Practical use of video imagery in
nearshore oceanographic field studies, J. Ocean Eng., 22, pp. 81-91.

Iwata, N., 1976, Rip current spacing, J. of Oceanographic Society of Japan, 32, pp. 1-10.

Kennedy, A. B., 2003, A circulation description of a rip current neck, J. Fluid Mech.,
497, pp. 225-234

Kennedy, A. B., R. A. Dalrymple, 2001, Wave group forcing of rip currents, Ocean
Wave Measurement and Analysis, V. 2, pp 1426-1435

Komar, P. D., 1998, Beach processes and sedimentation, 2nd Edition, Prentice Hall, Inc.,
Englewood Cliffs, NJ, USA

Lascody, R. L., 1998, East Central Florida rip current program, National Weather Digest,
22(2), pp. 25-30.

Longuet-Higgins, M. S., 1970a, Longshore currents generated by obliquely incident sea
waves, 1, J. Geophys. Res., 75, pp. 6778-6789.

Longuet-Higgins, M. S., 1970b, Longshore currents generated by obliquely incident sea
waves, 2, J. Geophys. Res., 75, pp. 6790-6801.

Longuet-Higgins, M. S., R. W. Stewart, 1964, Radiation stress in water waves, a physical
discussion with applications, Deep Sea Res., 11(4), pp. 529-563.

MacMahan, J., A. J. H. M. Reniers, T. P. Stanton, and E. B. Thorton, 2004, Infragravity
rip current pulsations, J. Geophys. Res., 109, C01033, doi: 10.1029/2003JC002068.

Munk, W. H., 1949, Surf beats, Eos Trans. AGU, 30(6), pp. 849-854.

McKenzie, P., 1958, Rip current systems, J.Geol., 66, pp. 103-113.

Oh, T. M., R. G. Dean, 1996, Three-dimensional hydrodynamics on a barred beach, Proc.
Intl. Conf Coast. Eng., New York, pp. 3680-3692.






88


Peregrine, D. H., 1998, Surf zone currents, Theoretical and computational fluid
dynamics, 10 (1-4), pp. 295-309.

Peregrine, D. H., 1999, Large-scale vorticity generation by breakers in shallow and deep
water, Eur. J. Mech. B/Fluids, 18, pp. 403-408.

Ranashinghe, R., G. Symonds, and R. Holman, 1999, Quantitative characterization of rip
dynamics via video imaging, Proc. Coast. Sed., pp. 576-587.

Sasaki, T. O., and K. Horikawa, 1979, Observations of nearshore currents and edge
waves, Proc. 16th Coastal Eng. Conf, Hamburg, pp. 791-809

Schmidt, W. E., B. T. Woodward, K. S. Millikan, R. T. Guza, B. Raubenheimer, and S.
Elgar, 2001, A GPS tracked surfzone drifter, Submitted to J-TECH, November.

Shepard, F. P., 1936, Undertow, rip tides, or rip currents, Science, Vol. 84, pp. 181-182.

Shepard, F. P., K. O. Emery, E. C. La Fond, 1941, Rip currents: a process of geological
importance, J. Geol., 49, pp. 337-369.

Shepard F. P., D. L. Inman, 1950, Nearshore water circulation related to bottom
topography and wave refraction, EOS Trans. AGU, 31(2), pp. 196-212.

Shepard F. P., D. L. Inman, 1951, Nearshore circulation, Proc. 1st Conf Coastal Eng.,
Univ. of California, La Jolla, CA pp. 50-59

Slinn, D. N., and J. Yu, 2002, Effects of wave-current interaction on rip currents, J.
Geophys. Res. Oceans, 108 (C3), Art. No. 3088

Smith, J. A., J. L. Largier, 1995, Observations of nearshore circulation: rip currents, J.
Geophys. Res., 100, pp. 10967-10975.

Sonu, C. J., 1972, Field observation of nearshore circulation and meandering currents, J.
Geophys. Res., 77, pp. 3232-3247.

Thomas, D.A., 2003, Laboratory rip current circulation using video-tracked Lagrangian
drifters, M. Sc. Thesis, University of Florida.

Wei, G., J. T. Kirby, S. T. Grilli, R. Subramanya, 1995, A fully nonlinear Boussinesq
model for surface waves, 1. Highly nonlinear unsteady waves, J. Fluid Mech., 294,
pp. 271-299.

Wind, H. G., C. B. Vreugdenhil, 1986, Rip current generation near structures, J. Fluid
Mech., 171, pp. 459-476.

Wright, L. D., and A. D. Short, 1984, Morphodynamic variability of surf zones and
beaches: A synthesis, Mar. Geol., 56, pp. 93-118.















BIOGRAPHICAL SKETCH

Enrique Gutierrez Diez was born in Palencia, in the region of Castilla y Le6n,

Spain, to Mr. Enrique Felix Gutierrez Ozamiz and Mrs. Maria Cruz Diez Gonzalez. The

author and his family used to spend the summer vacations in Cadiz, in the south of Spain,

where he enjoyed the beach and later on he had the opportunity to sail along the south of

Spain. These experiences instilled in him the passion for the ocean and everything related

to it.

After graduating from Victorio Macho High School in 1995, he moved to

Santander to pursue the degree in civil engineering at the University of Cantabria. In

early 2000 he was accepted to the exchange program to attend the University of Miami

during the academic year 2000/2001, during which he took his first coastal related

course. After going back to Santander for his final year, he decided to specialize in

coastal engineering, during this year he worked as a student assistant in the Department

of Coastal and Oceanographic Engineering (GIOC) at the University of Cantabria. After

being accepted to a number of universities, he decided to go to Gainesville, Florida, to get

his Master of Science in coastal engineering at the University of Florida. Upon obtaining

the degree the author plans to go back to Spain to work on this exciting field.