<%BANNER%>

Transformations of the (silver) screen

University of Florida Institutional Repository
xml version 1.0 encoding UTF-8
REPORT xmlns http:www.fcla.edudlsmddaitss xmlns:xsi http:www.w3.org2001XMLSchema-instance xsi:schemaLocation http:www.fcla.edudlsmddaitssdaitssReport.xsd
INGEST IEID E20110109_AAAAXK INGEST_TIME 2011-01-09T16:37:19Z PACKAGE UFE0000690_00001
AGREEMENT_INFO ACCOUNT UF PROJECT UFDC
FILES
FILE SIZE 6229 DFID F20110109_AABVNB ORIGIN DEPOSITOR PATH grieb_m_Page_057thm.jpg GLOBAL false PRESERVATION BIT MESSAGE_DIGEST ALGORITHM MD5
790247a09721d5006f38783e57ae8b83
SHA-1
36cd0a95988835f9bf762c2afee886a6aca0259c
4456 F20110109_AABTTP grieb_m_Page_224thm.jpg
53b90ca51250e91fb35043d2b8e288fd
7885f5127d42b137a39732db935d564b9fe87c4e
27263 F20110109_AABUQI grieb_m_Page_046.QC.jpg
e6f6c13ecea5de56dffa6abdb935a7c1
8dec92d9e6b1cff370f26ce06e3214a6e4d27c6a
6486 F20110109_AABVNC grieb_m_Page_058thm.jpg
6328f85dffde87976d03bbdaa79cc84d
55f35ca91612efe0c9f7a88ff97d4b808704bc72
91670 F20110109_AABUQJ grieb_m_Page_158.jpg
cc746982df137b65ff771985ea480fee
44e6b0744151de1d0ad841cb6f2f9ef40163b3e1
6813 F20110109_AABVND grieb_m_Page_061thm.jpg
d4c7a015be5852ff5415eaa71f32d874
f87455a8a65b9c90a59f38993eb6f53d7397b4b5
90930 F20110109_AABTTQ grieb_m_Page_077.jpg
9c95c7b565fcca49247c701d58a5496e
70cb1064719ef1661b3fb6c2565c7934f86b2a86
26695 F20110109_AABUQK grieb_m_Page_096.QC.jpg
146ee2dbc871bdf31bcd11d927e98b08
4e7590c3e7bf43f2eee98b296994e176328361cd
26432 F20110109_AABVNE grieb_m_Page_062.QC.jpg
2e0e83ffbdb220e2d8316e2d2da1780e
0ffbdba719a904b6b5253f3448b8f8d273d035a6
3759 F20110109_AABTTR grieb_m_Page_003.jp2
f7cd307ce81648608a1d6a23ded14904
acf4179c14e6774611fad358499f2f61e19287db
2258 F20110109_AABUQL grieb_m_Page_150.txt
b41f4032b5c806541f50f62e88a32796
3ec6c44f7dfb97fe644ceaf2567db4ff78b5b511
6422 F20110109_AABVNF grieb_m_Page_062thm.jpg
2a1b5c5d0b7d6ec17f60d02e339fb508
2deede721c8f945b33ff10f02d5119d8f026049b
1053954 F20110109_AABUDA grieb_m_Page_111.tif
12ada3ab6f8a064ef02addd7ece1a03b
ed60fe319ac45510c443212c7ebfe92d4a07310b
F20110109_AABTTS grieb_m_Page_041.tif
e6fdb622ef0ae24397d3db482a3957e6
eceebbfd8444583922c38a80e7b5486049871715
28881 F20110109_AABVNG grieb_m_Page_063.QC.jpg
41843f938cbc1c9821d094e4ad3e7f44
b8cc424090bd8bde879e1958cfae454db3c13668
F20110109_AABUDB grieb_m_Page_121.tif
bb89d01a4705e7bc3d9e106f5982b53f
8204397992af5c38364f8ebb015aafcbb60b5f49
5981 F20110109_AABTTT grieb_m_Page_100thm.jpg
52139a1ecd5035d09650a31ad9a1b51d
8d6af93b65cff7df3b36f53f9e6178198c8d21cb
27753 F20110109_AABUQM grieb_m_Page_156.QC.jpg
bdbc95d885dd16e0b8ff082417a2bdca
9d0ddcb7060fb5e925e76dcabe6888d0b9bb0cc2
11750 F20110109_AABVNH grieb_m_Page_064.QC.jpg
6b403bbc53186950c312cc92aca78cc1
c658aedd9e97f96ed0b67e39015c780cb70bb89d
60241 F20110109_AABUDC grieb_m_Page_165.pro
36156e64de1ab5b16f1eef8e37aba8f3
5b860127ae603dc8720ac6680736b884190591ac
29734 F20110109_AABTTU grieb_m_Page_203.QC.jpg
f0d6d9f3db7fdd86db43c59114b1a85f
8966fbc65bd0bd19cd547748b9eee2bab3bf651a
131816 F20110109_AABUQN grieb_m_Page_031.jp2
ec6cc677ff20fc1afd230e5f6c701283
385eb917f7eed8a65c4d125f24631ca2be6bfb36
52490 F20110109_AABUDD grieb_m_Page_108.pro
c24097e0283d3c22765b8b43154d7a92
c11c9c24839f8e6c17bb34ae8cbd0439d2209bfa
28283 F20110109_AABTTV grieb_m_Page_104.QC.jpg
878009ec1a756a50b427a26dee163b9d
b2c9db43267296e9c7eaa8353931e105b0f0e703
27747 F20110109_AABUQO grieb_m_Page_101.QC.jpg
08b0e1502c270a9d547800fdc2bbc59c
732473a3a45d8a4feb544e15bb58013601e9d819
2982 F20110109_AABVNI grieb_m_Page_064thm.jpg
a3c9a4fa260f5fdac8a83e126d705369
84345b6824df732a07cf92c7d54137ac23e58637
62328 F20110109_AABUDE grieb_m_Page_040.pro
a6fce03a6233f9e46851611c1bce85d7
1ef8fe44cdccf316cb2b64b0a9b155d3d7fe5595
5678 F20110109_AABTTW grieb_m_Page_118thm.jpg
edc416ff5c1a1a1f4a8ed89ef2c488ee
8dbaff65a77f090272f8c89aabf9fd9ff962f0f5
110894 F20110109_AABUQP grieb_m_Page_200.jpg
119f7f870fb7fc56c508bb982cbeb221
d037cd82444ca5811c42c824bb9365d6c16134be
5076 F20110109_AABVNJ grieb_m_Page_065thm.jpg
2f4e72d1ce10c1d587d27efdbc0784f2
6bb817960efb529108c34ec2900229e5fcca8ace
2186 F20110109_AABUDF grieb_m_Page_215.txt
a9cfe3d1868811e9aca92088da90a201
0159ae04fd69ba378eaff327a17863322eecf2ce
F20110109_AABTTX grieb_m_Page_143.tif
650737cba1e37c39a6fc4f0df19cfbee
ee3094128aadacc31f75d0da52056a33c83b8c1e
87545 F20110109_AABUQQ grieb_m_Page_139.jpg
a6c18dac29944ebbd08c9a15e3a6219c
7a6ff0caa62f3dbfa12e452ce30883f249287ca4
24988 F20110109_AABVNK grieb_m_Page_066.QC.jpg
43467e87291e1d6467d99d8978ad3e85
2f22c8b60f0420ef316ddb7912449c0dd921fe4b
108518 F20110109_AABUDG grieb_m_Page_066.jp2
c1c68abc66e8f4580c9ad8ffd932591c
d353f5abe89aff7ffad4c1c16fd8de63c8d710d8
115163 F20110109_AABTTY grieb_m_Page_045.jp2
1bbd4e7ba9c75062b4437c76ba2aaa0e
a58ffb1f5a46385fb7fa7b9128ce0df9d6e7d598
83247 F20110109_AABUQR grieb_m_Page_074.jpg
1710cc94c5fcf55275a039ad1e8db601
3c92eaad649c6ce1e208f45dbdb9156632a14327
27671 F20110109_AABVNL grieb_m_Page_067.QC.jpg
f473e4e6c59a1bedaa8fd159caeb1992
4b50709c252c5f980ccb23e2c56975d18839a651
2104 F20110109_AABUDH grieb_m_Page_207.txt
33d9ca9cfbf3f77de11b9ac8731830b8
426a5afebb8d71a9f0efe88ecc506a51db119fd7
F20110109_AABTTZ grieb_m_Page_113.tif
4d25e36af445c79fc79e6f5cf0fbc87a
ec0344cd8245878a041872d822ba49ef0bba9ed1
F20110109_AABVAA grieb_m_Page_052.tif
39916a991b93101bfb4dc60beb5060bd
1e794b01f9b0c8c76bb919e5229752b0014a8f56
2169 F20110109_AABUQS grieb_m_Page_091.txt
bfc3851642ef91b8129094be38ec7aa5
c4a16b11e265ed81b2c304f55738a3fda8444fa2
6353 F20110109_AABVNM grieb_m_Page_067thm.jpg
8f9bc9ace17779ed443373a8b3b9f41c
15d967e1267e2db90693aa4ec51329c9e68ff407
2554 F20110109_AABUDI grieb_m_Page_160.txt
e9e35a3067ebadf3d0121d1306f851b1
5241d7d18fdb425ae077e260caeccbfd195d1f07
F20110109_AABVAB grieb_m_Page_055.tif
bc353ee02f616540bd8d670f1d79b136
b4718af76c815ec19ffb75e2e5e2bb4d21a1ab8e
6467 F20110109_AABUQT grieb_m_Page_182thm.jpg
72dbedf9fa7aefcb9979acca64ce5452
15110aff8d75069d83281a696736032b31848c19
6520 F20110109_AABVNN grieb_m_Page_068thm.jpg
adea5822168ee632f4bf9f2f798169e0
9e24bb2fd08b69b96b8fb4292ccc8c9bbd747393
25536 F20110109_AABUDJ grieb_m_Page_018.QC.jpg
3a3016bccd050d4b85da84090d04ec92
f273efb743192b57bb649d6bf9af59d9aa9152f4
F20110109_AABVAC grieb_m_Page_061.tif
5292ee70059403560910af6035904f87
7bdbec8da8d036a4fd7ee25e9cffc0348af898e8
110756 F20110109_AABUQU grieb_m_Page_210.jp2
c7a8fa4bba36aef79056b49a13a0722f
24cfb5e60940905719e8caeaba23061534782d2a
27996 F20110109_AABVNO grieb_m_Page_070.QC.jpg
d71b91d573b4e4ca1038bc2de7baf0cf
bdf53bd33fb0fbedd0ddb2c99077140009f86928
F20110109_AABUDK grieb_m_Page_069.tif
0c0ea3453aa36814b5854dd12c5b0d7a
5f339116b868555bddecf258431c7caa45fcfce8
F20110109_AABVAD grieb_m_Page_063.tif
1ec3c5f1d2967ce7410af4d1ef9e66a5
6473362200ceb9b9cd4472a7ea9f592108e6a9de
103846 F20110109_AABUQV grieb_m_Page_020.jp2
261769b971a8a22494e035316d2a4a21
02d3593efc3451cb9d6d6f5d05e5e93cbe328292
6476 F20110109_AABVNP grieb_m_Page_070thm.jpg
31d5814babe596c0c4962c0298b7b6f6
176f3e9e977f512ad1da22a9051994f1692779ce
53936 F20110109_AABUDL grieb_m_Page_215.pro
d2853f6ad30ae66e447f8663ee7c9038
fb7832dda71c0194576b41b40d549bf81ad5e3df
F20110109_AABVAE grieb_m_Page_066.tif
4360afe9a1e47c534c501de7c0eee5eb
8be8fe8d0e7ad819382ff901c44030d87c7b120d
129379 F20110109_AABUQW grieb_m_Page_216.jp2
ea8e1f84736cbcc4af78ec20bc190205
53cc32074a36b726067ad9d5c41889e43bedd093
6258 F20110109_AABVNQ grieb_m_Page_071thm.jpg
425210d114e384af1c2229f5d05a71e3
8fedf2565676fbf0aebae31039141c585d84c946
92364 F20110109_AABUDM grieb_m_Page_025.jpg
09c82fbf4e76b759e423b9204ca77679
0fdf4fc2568d56655dec0b8a153428d2d5725e18
F20110109_AABVAF grieb_m_Page_068.tif
58dbb41f4cf174855279434b25a6a41d
9b40e20608b76241fb82991e5efd5c157ac064ce
27632 F20110109_AABUQX grieb_m_Page_157.QC.jpg
e26c4abb0c5027bbc4ac52436480d7f7
f02bbdfe9efec7a6c2c1280974b90160604f95ff
25636 F20110109_AABVNR grieb_m_Page_073.QC.jpg
bae6b3f77f4fcdca682a27d31244d961
8e7aefe762f612bf3b22d7456b4606fed7740d58
F20110109_AABUDN grieb_m_Page_215.tif
a59aaa5fc4d9513a658e4065012325f1
2d62645e6a0cfd36c0609f9601e3b4c60b8995b5
F20110109_AABVAG grieb_m_Page_070.tif
365682a43c2ad0d55779939d3cb140f0
a8a0e6919285862ba6fd5378d06dcf5066ecc8e0
87908 F20110109_AABUQY grieb_m_Page_036.jpg
a8f5ec278f5b46ddb8d9e57ddf820b61
9562f77270fad92c41f77ec8d7ac3b612a97fbd7
6232 F20110109_AABVNS grieb_m_Page_073thm.jpg
00aaec0335097be746446b5dcf6306e7
93f20b7e5ef09c0bf30e3fed5038f59748ccb8de
109926 F20110109_AABUDO grieb_m_Page_015.jp2
201162073792eb9363bd63182d48e3c4
69c3f78c68837d4c911b9d661e0240a87b5ffa65
F20110109_AABVAH grieb_m_Page_072.tif
166d8db866d6a0df217c2db735fa06d1
c9eb26b010e2ba08bcb98b158670b9a2d813f308
108814 F20110109_AABUQZ grieb_m_Page_116.jp2
06fd87a9b58ddf32d641ccde72c6c940
669a2563a4e5a37fee0cfc40ab4d144d18d51a7e
6198 F20110109_AABVNT grieb_m_Page_074thm.jpg
48c065f9a75fdf2837dad77570c78d7a
2381e3dca5b552dc34bac43a0061f70db1645489
F20110109_AABUDP grieb_m_Page_123.tif
6bd1774655d6f4438c440a2477fc5a6d
b35eba6350ff7cb4f97ed8ae755e5fc29149b11e
F20110109_AABVAI grieb_m_Page_074.tif
89db15498e7a630554cf1833a391fa0b
c4668cb66069c6946ec2f8256ab9ac4648b5c12f
26287 F20110109_AABVNU grieb_m_Page_076.QC.jpg
9c519be7efcbf99dd6b365a0d12eb787
1cd948328294ac3a0c6ecdff7fd2a719d0fcde97
6404 F20110109_AABTZA grieb_m_Page_111thm.jpg
44c4259f745b9d97ac679555d5d4a63e
84bed4a7657028e6e6b3f5cef99b7f32597d582b
92232 F20110109_AABUDQ grieb_m_Page_035.jpg
f3b12ebd88c59994959209fb1eef1b01
89e518363bf63a488a6a67a74b4fcf079100e812
F20110109_AABVAJ grieb_m_Page_075.tif
d3d547e63daeb1ee9f5e9a701003e1b9
f22e8978b059a53f811d7cd5c0bef1ab2c6e3a79
6321 F20110109_AABVNV grieb_m_Page_078thm.jpg
f78df33cfa76eba512307c01ef66ca4b
1383039c6d6ec19c6df77b4a8ba66c6e5b59bc9c
114711 F20110109_AABTZB grieb_m_Page_087.jp2
5057f25f111c33cb403e4d24da66583a
c5e2c47adabf365e92038bba1496bc7d7db4b464
8760 F20110109_AABUDR grieb_m_Page_009.QC.jpg
ae6b1d60c6a55b9d38d2345ce6f98a77
0b889847b5a005ee10fbe90ecf33375e6a57e406
F20110109_AABVAK grieb_m_Page_077.tif
515bcd35a08b4bec7d393006b2efa9f0
67014e3516364b4d47b3414b9fd9ff6ded1d21a5
6341 F20110109_AABVNW grieb_m_Page_080thm.jpg
d5fca18a1c0dc8f865d7082219c3d23d
fc00304758338c78204defef08abc6b8a95b3b4f
112291 F20110109_AABTZC grieb_m_Page_146.jp2
95f9f84eb376ce5f350fcf2776a132a4
5aaddd57e663e3bd664c67bfb70c336e7dd9861e
2770 F20110109_AABUDS grieb_m_Page_131.txt
d73f96a4a60c854c35143b10ce31cd23
bb5c51b77fe21394d29bfd2737b6068d12382e94
F20110109_AABVAL grieb_m_Page_080.tif
bdaf62917b3753630d358970038f5976
78a9d146b00c3c5a7477376921b9cbf0db310637
6421 F20110109_AABVNX grieb_m_Page_081thm.jpg
1f00aab1ae0865d035544e2be3a25ecb
b95f16ce4aae08f00d04bca9681dffd54cfaace8
6149 F20110109_AABTZD grieb_m_Page_177thm.jpg
f876ad48d912923979d1dde23611c417
f5dd7d5ad9966fc4804af2057abfd01100ae5fff
120820 F20110109_AABUDT grieb_m_Page_071.jp2
0c66c448ba584470297d3c266c397641
57c02ed6cb93c629529e85543f41c43e14480cf6
F20110109_AABVAM grieb_m_Page_081.tif
68482fc53c2ba3046277b3635d109df2
23fe733479aba3ff8d1cedffbb13cc36772b76f8
27255 F20110109_AABVNY grieb_m_Page_082.QC.jpg
f30b4263469d56581c277a560f0faec0
015314443d7bf81e45ee884b29617e52935d7a51
57140 F20110109_AABTZE grieb_m_Page_058.pro
9682c37083a94132e4480a2f778081aa
4cc34f3e2ae26144df311aedfee88cd2396171dc
59613 F20110109_AABUDU grieb_m_Page_114.pro
ca86e4b74deb1f9a23ec43f885c4b548
2d7a5282b40143fa07df1ea54d2f41bd79c1bfcb
F20110109_AABVAN grieb_m_Page_085.tif
b2c66578fff0acd4cfa0fd6d623490b5
eb1c753aa06305d2f2661ad109dad920a0af49de
27107 F20110109_AABVNZ grieb_m_Page_083.QC.jpg
ac316de1ae743abfb66d7e7821a57c8c
690a12f60e9f2c1c09a6a7af8ffd56a116457fe5
76802 F20110109_AABTZF grieb_m_Page_006.pro
7b8f548665074479d3d5e8b6df4601db
735db55c1640d6163ee8f5c685946ed50928a689
120733 F20110109_AABUDV grieb_m_Page_046.jp2
72475038a80f93a0720e18e0eb929d7a
86bdef39d79cb97e7c2fae330d802b39c44534f3
F20110109_AABVAO grieb_m_Page_086.tif
ac8ff3a85a34f69352b917835bc3b044
cfbe49d61840376115a8f8f451f72806ad0dca29
1726 F20110109_AABTZG grieb_m_Page_004.txt
c5b341d658f927718870d95f554f0b0d
36960d1bdbbbebeab300dddac9fdac0d75070762
90773 F20110109_AABUDW grieb_m_Page_067.jpg
e1f41d32fbb85924ac827eb94cb1ae48
9586b80f2f8e55ecd98579d10d69f116800db85b
F20110109_AABVAP grieb_m_Page_087.tif
89b3c161d044ef0f5541510b6eb34128
4ee6720897528809dbf316404da5b87b521b4e05
117468 F20110109_AABTZH grieb_m_Page_187.jp2
5fbdac72c26b38a4146d544a9b9d0631
8b379f04a87c13811913a3eee929649facf40fbb
2473 F20110109_AABUDX grieb_m_Page_056.txt
e7c6b317df847c4b4f193e0e3044a1b6
2d6cdf2dda4108e72228db895454ba7a74778c9d
133587 F20110109_AABUWA grieb_m_Page_038.jp2
f33924c63c7ae3796ffeaa9225c4c0aa
726ed4a09a5d6683006a37cc4f8d59bda071ef7f
F20110109_AABVAQ grieb_m_Page_088.tif
c5e71fed0525e1d523dda3848cc5b158
c6b98fb12fc041ec51ce8325a3154bed930d918b
F20110109_AABTZI grieb_m_Page_158.tif
c11e0bf71b0bb4f078c57019488187cf
78e5a877d51201a73d68980ce83f9c5d9b7da9b3
F20110109_AABUDY grieb_m_Page_166.tif
60018839493f57987a9086ebd60b935e
4b9d49497965218f4eca65d98c58a6d4f85c685e
113212 F20110109_AABUWB grieb_m_Page_039.jp2
44163a18829bf79fcf34d29be818565f
c621747eaa82d194be3bdbf005a79037733922d3
F20110109_AABVAR grieb_m_Page_089.tif
2ce41e770b2fbaf97a140cbe3c6658ae
66713f7497c3eff13780e7396ff1ed26ce824cf4
53531 F20110109_AABTZJ grieb_m_Page_080.pro
666f0e32d957dfd452628dbc637851d0
623291e1772278d550ab4edcefb9d255e90702f7
26618 F20110109_AABUDZ grieb_m_Page_071.QC.jpg
760d104d09c7247df3b0e30e07a244b4
b95f563b0b9c90801b84775009adc408936a51f4
122573 F20110109_AABUWC grieb_m_Page_040.jp2
f1ea1bea884aae2dc56fc2cf4307bc59
b46f6fa16f4555aeb5fc4fb1d298fb0b3178f20d
F20110109_AABVAS grieb_m_Page_090.tif
01a5b5535bfb6fda00594102935c5712
19de228f063471aeecb681770aebcb2ef06d0ef8
2988 F20110109_AABTZK grieb_m_Page_201.txt
79ece6ff5e13f995605420fcb20f52aa
753eb8d85f68bb5b9c206f54d6d7898e3548ad77
120449 F20110109_AABUWD grieb_m_Page_041.jp2
11a5a718530b90850969d5af34d1902e
6cad2e0289a7c818fe87e78f66731db27a864c61
F20110109_AABVAT grieb_m_Page_092.tif
670d03c2fac826e982e821a7e4201398
6c563721d7b1c420adc50b9378d5b999ec9a340b
F20110109_AABTZL grieb_m_Page_099.tif
0ada4dc9a965ce7d4caeada6bdd4e1fd
4684a4391e61e68030988c63a1c725798eb5b00c
124152 F20110109_AABUWE grieb_m_Page_048.jp2
feac2337a2f848be9ea06ded691b0d45
6b55208fc3d0d362da0e369412b707043d4ca2a1
F20110109_AABVAU grieb_m_Page_094.tif
8b2b62a04571c5fba34a7ce12732d336
c893d13d0961c39d4552efe77420133542caa5f7
85220 F20110109_AABTMA grieb_m_Page_062.jpg
477a1bedc5a077cf8ef6a8cfdf1d8857
beb14a7830913c6a43e5aedea80b7d2bbb10ebc6
14734 F20110109_AABTZM grieb_m_Page_162.QC.jpg
3420f5aeefc2a27c9f074705fdc1b486
4438eee0c545521224b8960c55254593b0ef72dc
116476 F20110109_AABUWF grieb_m_Page_050.jp2
f708c88e4e0ae0377de7ea473beb5817
b2d52163f4e19e6188f34f06d958a8ac1c91dbf1
F20110109_AABVAV grieb_m_Page_096.tif
477fcac7d7f8421317f2977a24a97dc0
cd8633b871958b4c950ed7e1e1b63daf31c04589
2302 F20110109_AABTMB grieb_m_Page_174.txt
6de7ee175b678c5001c469a39de85ded
bab6ebd518bbb552c01ec650cb38a172361952f7
115633 F20110109_AABTZN grieb_m_Page_124.jp2
c595bc2266712d6002a1573dfeb4bb09
22487928f9b810bcb631e42939f4684cd7c6e1e9
106794 F20110109_AABUWG grieb_m_Page_054.jp2
a840bf337aaba89da63319a25967e340
66ef3aac93f8a3808b468bc9934e98dad44adcfd
F20110109_AABVAW grieb_m_Page_098.tif
3abc2fb656d63fb0a70b6d45f47cbaec
d92930d46c71180af3990b24680cb6804053517e
50926 F20110109_AABTMC grieb_m_Page_122.pro
1ad2785d420a8bac829c869a158b145c
59eafdded6098ad024c67614ccf7a8fbb8ef364b
51314 F20110109_AABTZO grieb_m_Page_135.pro
caa4bace050b610f8b5bde8777b5e7ae
820ba88c3b473217fa797c01af457a69bbd6ab2e
123206 F20110109_AABUWH grieb_m_Page_055.jp2
54520125064672fab249d9cbbe98ee11
820727d123a2e8f3767716ab9391e850e54b6ef8
F20110109_AABVAX grieb_m_Page_103.tif
5a5cc79b76e1afcbab482a108e7fad01
1da55ba849ed9a744d1e369fe2e046ba4b3a3358
F20110109_AABTMD grieb_m_Page_201.tif
082eb782044eb07085cb14bd001e3e06
45f8579e224761d90f4bb155d49d63dd5d683ec1
84038 F20110109_AABTZP grieb_m_Page_193.pro
01052eeb6bb3441ad01483d1b60c923e
b90fb04b44222a9cbb12ac0ed69065ec21badd30
126357 F20110109_AABUWI grieb_m_Page_056.jp2
ba5568e9afa2ffff830310b09c8ca969
25c1871b0916cb3ee1268c8f94040761f001d003
F20110109_AABVAY grieb_m_Page_104.tif
620bf8eb11c5bc7983d5c9122a9c5fcc
b322ecba6aa845b864f8a0edf70178b6cc991d55
115992 F20110109_AABTME grieb_m_Page_089.jp2
a6db5352206aa921b8ca5a4e0d36a968
3d9e1120353a46e67022f2b9b8fa283fb85bfe26
111122 F20110109_AABTZQ grieb_m_Page_192.jp2
233eb51708e269d8832dae64868579bf
07272ed7e430e7285ae63faec5bc4a52eb53ff9b
109252 F20110109_AABUWJ grieb_m_Page_057.jp2
c21a3835157997946e0ace4915371014
94801ebcce1cce135468061a16c835bc973e4977
F20110109_AABVAZ grieb_m_Page_107.tif
3e22559e77a2cfa3a2087456563aad39
85f95ba25e8e0ef266cd96ca8766c08a55851118
25271604 F20110109_AABTMF grieb_m_Page_007.tif
301a083625fcf1be51cba597326e595b
44345c2a073155b0c1529c1ddfd88893723174e2
98319 F20110109_AABTZR grieb_m_Page_022.jpg
f26bb90bc107792d9c68e0063d89fe33
20816c86dbced54a4fdf401875ae518526441cc9
48907 F20110109_AABUWK grieb_m_Page_064.jp2
3cbccd8a32e1bfc794636da9a5313b6c
f7d33f508677847cc5aa22844d25dd0c83b25a9e
52807 F20110109_AABTMG grieb_m_Page_103.pro
92238fa6c2eef1a92157ef8a46abe7c4
9bc694588f8f5ec36de41ee830b8ad19c242d11a
143149 F20110109_AABUJA grieb_m_Page_141.jp2
8658641aec696586d7fbdcff8c8679a6
8abc386746cfab5eab4a254d43f808bf30b7ec31
3201 F20110109_AABTZS grieb_m_Page_203.txt
b9ac854adfc41e6b0a8daab70e973093
0a9a985a55226d96873ed1309ae3afe7c9230561
86490 F20110109_AABUWL grieb_m_Page_065.jp2
efab9139055c3bcd6e4246c7907d5260
349e9f842655a34bf70fa325db7ea535808d125e
F20110109_AABTMH grieb_m_Page_156.tif
d3631bfc8acd71fb8f1890edf33c3f05
5b37cac5ea864b6a6afee0788714b4b5080aff9f
2436 F20110109_AABUJB grieb_m_Page_106.txt
2b1e2a9d0a537d778b9535ee45dff07a
302dc4e3955c3c210f3a1a8f7d8103c709d26a99
137535 F20110109_AABTZT grieb_m_Page_017.jp2
35ffb81f5ba66f5b4dfe1579f61b37e1
b86ed279be2893dae41e84777c533fee0fad1c70
120517 F20110109_AABUWM grieb_m_Page_067.jp2
6f61508be9b5dc5689fe8584304979f5
029818889a64f6658293ea4163eb304934bee2af
101055 F20110109_AABTMI grieb_m_Page_127.jp2
819de823ada65c7eb29f1f40880fd924
9e810d917915eeb69d86ce165aa98cb9880e6c09
26648 F20110109_AABUJC grieb_m_Page_060.QC.jpg
98bdb1731132b9d981068af762f5e964
e13e7254f2ff1aa059e0edd642b301f9ba07c2c6
113114 F20110109_AABTZU grieb_m_Page_197.jp2
de98f927a5b50f4e2d4fcc0f5ae8db1e
e87f6cbac262bb5eeab0ee8826a60ac617b94744
131173 F20110109_AABUWN grieb_m_Page_070.jp2
7270f723451bcf779f21091a5694d575
fbba67c8e50c115655bdfd7f13c5103b42b725d4
25531 F20110109_AABUJD grieb_m_Page_145.QC.jpg
fe39e6cbdafebd1887c7cb283ed4ed4b
bad4a97aaa37b145c4124054c41730074983aeb2
2049 F20110109_AABTZV grieb_m_Page_142.txt
cbb786da29cf12623c2ee416ca16ed25
74d2baf6a64bdaeaa4f958632ac203b119ce79cc
108405 F20110109_AABUWO grieb_m_Page_073.jp2
da628acd1375891cfbedb01b7455d429
bbd2ef6ab65a585a9f94823c7cc490bbb9b5bb30
56525 F20110109_AABTMJ grieb_m_Page_124.pro
e53f51492b67b45076d4bb15e6734f51
77775275bb88cc8d55bc7f856f3eb5310b15e79b
40736 F20110109_AABUJE grieb_m_Page_008.pro
d33fb55f810011c4bb01f9cd9765b96c
68ceccd521b0e70ccd88303e800773404b8042b6
110016 F20110109_AABUWP grieb_m_Page_075.jp2
69c042bc49220fc27b2e12153b264272
f53e25b35ea4da0127fa796b7d1d3599e66477be
F20110109_AABTMK grieb_m_Page_171.tif
116eeab69c59669dcd49b6ed1ec17844
341cb96390ff585663fe87d9efffce8d8efce9ab
F20110109_AABTZW grieb_m_Page_059.tif
e16fa384681c8c82f1d901d7416ad484
4811e1f1229df8ec9307eadc12bdb73dba1b0f83
108940 F20110109_AABUWQ grieb_m_Page_076.jp2
ef810f2dcb100715498b5156dbe92ec4
d58c2d794e24f81f511104a4584a076c7afc82a3
83895 F20110109_AABTML grieb_m_Page_122.jpg
69b889c5295efe5775f59680f1c64180
084b801cda6d51d25cca2d25bed1540ca9fe15ed
76 F20110109_AABUJF grieb_m_Page_003.txt
42cc9d95102d9c4065090e2bceed27aa
44006e8efae65c4c11004e635d6f8119a1a49591
90676 F20110109_AABTZX grieb_m_Page_152.jpg
0bbe3b084685fc84f5a0b5aae22612ce
4d13490be8b017a52f595aef4db721c8089c9e21
118915 F20110109_AABUWR grieb_m_Page_079.jp2
d8171644fbf1c4abddb5d97f66a42268
f75940a49fe2a96e84fd13462e5195fc25db4f51
2080 F20110109_AABTMM grieb_m_Page_168.txt
5178226683664c9156fdfa235dfb5623
84671e8a16594831c2d101c2cae53894905a51bb
2391 F20110109_AABUJG grieb_m_Page_221.txt
f323e25de7702efb697f4c32bf97e80a
dcfad2a9de8186ae0d6f5fb9f2c59829936a1c8d
25317 F20110109_AABTZY grieb_m_Page_022.QC.jpg
f0a1fd6a60d3c4d666972fadf8d732e4
d8a8255512eb65f6c3166a6b0caa008741484909
52831 F20110109_AABVGA grieb_m_Page_171.pro
940a4aa367171ab5422bab63f1c29f6b
9749848475ae6ddce2e73ee0626a3bd34aa20e1c
61287 F20110109_AABTMN grieb_m_Page_102.pro
ddb487eff6eb7b77880beb751d9768a2
21891abb2439c2221c1076425f5a34830cab2433
2083 F20110109_AABUJH grieb_m_Page_015.txt
776bd7eb9a79c41e64ac63ee8f39218d
044372d2798117482858644dbda95c62b783ac3e
91881 F20110109_AABTZZ grieb_m_Page_140.jpg
006e2aad0aa7daf8454715e216397cf4
86e83a59dd9f85d9d9951d44f0b555fe492e39b0
115322 F20110109_AABUWS grieb_m_Page_082.jp2
9108ea64b49adc27095f49eb6d6c1903
32f22f57afedd9ff1b8bb2f202c28b72b39e333b
1090 F20110109_AABTMO grieb_m_Page_002.pro
1ec04c271a21a42c47c526d8f04005cf
031ce35526b9e4f7ccc4b087d66ecb234d559511
25274 F20110109_AABUJI grieb_m_Page_116.QC.jpg
60e0c6f1eb9807c00207104c96653081
66757bf050a59b8147419216e03ca2f6e160b8f1
58969 F20110109_AABVGB grieb_m_Page_174.pro
bd81eb0fd2e9707e9c54dd9153ef75f0
acca27547d6fd3c6ba51b35d36a2555aa909cc01
115723 F20110109_AABUWT grieb_m_Page_084.jp2
a928218f479c1b816d7b22528be33ceb
6cea8f73039df6d74098d63beec48dfa9674231f
F20110109_AABTMP grieb_m_Page_196.tif
e550a984796cfe1c0cd83c5e0e4e4559
12da028b9ba77545c7fd0fb95891de7df50e5756
50830 F20110109_AABUJJ grieb_m_Page_019.pro
2f4c9f0d2577d9e328f6e585ca849fcf
350cc3f1b99c91274b1b49af2ab4f59fe562a329
54718 F20110109_AABVGC grieb_m_Page_179.pro
41ffe6787f7c0bc6a37c68044cb38b2c
e73c98973beabe38826f0fb2918b60902181bdf9
123572 F20110109_AABUWU grieb_m_Page_088.jp2
cfb60f2f5c8d127bf5a1b95d8d4dac96
e9ad17c69731b75980d6cc293f76c1e957e5d78d
1577 F20110109_AABTMQ grieb_m_Page_001thm.jpg
ed9828a656b7b55562d189fbd8dba75c
576f39a7ca80cd9f804875905b14c82634594881
87031 F20110109_AABUJK grieb_m_Page_179.jpg
84507de9c7ecb12a53226785abb99172
50758605a1d5d6819fdd635e64e63ea28ce39295
53506 F20110109_AABVGD grieb_m_Page_182.pro
f341b0716a8c2460c9c2699b598f1945
19bfaebabea7cdce8342407afd24ad61387b9a5a
140767 F20110109_AABUWV grieb_m_Page_092.jp2
85cce603024d95af9f0815bb4efdde69
89bbd83212b7c2b8895b7fbd83d47d98cc5e91f1
48941 F20110109_AABTMR grieb_m_Page_116.pro
1420bbec3be3129165a9ca3ff0c45fe8
2a8c9d88b2fd4d23bd65094a509f5b75af17cf53
F20110109_AABUJL grieb_m_Page_119.tif
4f4eb724752bbe7d6de13b24b290d36c
edc529a8d0c6970315d224e1888bbbd42347077b
49104 F20110109_AABVGE grieb_m_Page_183.pro
1e2f9a68244c173ecfa131ae28154891
a23266763071d410b6b80b0b91e78831fb9b3c94
125570 F20110109_AABUWW grieb_m_Page_093.jp2
74971ecde60ca90390afe379e576400b
47ba84fbb9414b0c1aa8c2ec9706f05c330597c8
F20110109_AABTMS grieb_m_Page_011.tif
3320959892ab5c6aefc78253b16a1d1d
909a1e132cdcf35936d6ad5bd4f7cc10f10ccaf8
85860 F20110109_AABUJM grieb_m_Page_011.jpg
8382c662aec3e5aa6cfb9cac64cc44e8
077760ccf1c613af801d7b472c50ede55ff1330e
53730 F20110109_AABVGF grieb_m_Page_186.pro
ab013270b944d931544d53550d3c083c
aaa51f8b2dc4de9f9d0a92ec46e114bc4a795c89
111135 F20110109_AABUWX grieb_m_Page_094.jp2
919ef295ba07ac18919cee2d99f9839f
84cb236ea19efe64ee4306b3b2e48aefac7d0936
F20110109_AABTMT grieb_m_Page_185.tif
81bb11aa8b7b251bc4b0991aa146d21a
42a78a4611975623692410efc57cb3141b45fc7d
50693 F20110109_AABUJN grieb_m_Page_075.pro
d2847150c95aa6924002db44dbf725e6
79831348ff4fb12e6c608ed62ce99f381257da48
59652 F20110109_AABVGG grieb_m_Page_187.pro
a397882f1cc93b55434dc910f531e9a2
6f4dfe0f53847d8c20575c0e394915d1bbda19f0
113583 F20110109_AABUWY grieb_m_Page_095.jp2
831a61be4bb59cd65996a9bbd8f8b5e5
ad99b322bef199bb485a437d4b51850c94e227a9
29093 F20110109_AABTMU grieb_m_Page_153.QC.jpg
a5c23a3ccd8dc92109e0cb2bc5154167
27ce97ccdc5d5fdcc4e830b1a194df5fc3ee9939
6375 F20110109_AABUJO grieb_m_Page_083thm.jpg
ca3eda94037b8aecd7fa89be939a845c
ed3c6df553bebc076c46ee2843e71ec3ac0fd514
48776 F20110109_AABVGH grieb_m_Page_188.pro
94461ee54ba06b4d3bc1c7bd5cd9a074
2904f1f0f34f230d4e5726ead599fe6a2280d4ca
108368 F20110109_AABUWZ grieb_m_Page_103.jp2
7d1babda352b82484049e054014dd289
4c93f45b25478e0ba2d76146945ed1ce15e48147
108948 F20110109_AABTMV grieb_m_Page_122.jp2
3fdb098250a8c63ced016932f7d052db
43fe1684d480cbb3c7f27f478a8e1e7a03951078
26901 F20110109_AABUJP grieb_m_Page_217.QC.jpg
91897a207dccd07a81daa174565efb49
1cb3a8546641f9c35307743b29ec033d87377555
50219 F20110109_AABVGI grieb_m_Page_192.pro
79f5382f75aed82b862ef562289622f6
1e28afc8949f283573bc8662359d692851422b56
26264 F20110109_AABTMW grieb_m_Page_050.QC.jpg
6f71885f411e597669a3c36d778c35cd
801d9ceec1ea2da606c4ab717c2ba17756354151
6017 F20110109_AABUJQ grieb_m_Page_183thm.jpg
2c1e2fda223eefe3016775e37c5d8384
d8056843ad992406eccd628acc4a0e244fc56268
56087 F20110109_AABVGJ grieb_m_Page_195.pro
7d73af4ef2ab5f0e87ede8c206df95c8
177af1980c6db84614d262fca20841777264825b
57161 F20110109_AABTMX grieb_m_Page_223.pro
e4fb3b872e66e9e8c75af1f7e57f811c
651d335f1863890a568f3087665c8bf746aec9ee
6523 F20110109_AABUJR grieb_m_Page_181thm.jpg
066340c39698315936e469157f951cbb
a9b133022dbc18193ac578560e7605e2ac9cdadd
62028 F20110109_AABVGK grieb_m_Page_202.pro
fa79899c0d29198cce1dabecce412281
91d1c5c739c40ec8fae58ae4b46d66376f4e7806
2150 F20110109_AABTMY grieb_m_Page_132.txt
96d222df39fcb5aa51410b080cba94fe
710c0a5550d87c76704979f115cafbc28905ed64
81028 F20110109_AABUJS grieb_m_Page_159.jpg
bb0e84142766e275859a0bb8a4a77fde
63bff411bffafa7d40da32a420c2b848a0574a3a
83504 F20110109_AABVGL grieb_m_Page_203.pro
64dd3819a86fe2a32bc8e743b7a4ace6
b5dfbfb8247f32dc8059a9ae4140b32eec8ddb0d
1233 F20110109_AABTMZ grieb_m_Page_162.txt
bdd06dc2c4a5561db5d1a944f305df40
dcf449f02d9f02cada315548b5e8ef32f85c7e65
1964 F20110109_AABUJT grieb_m_Page_076.txt
20151cab793790c848702a07e5af8f4b
1c71d71bfcbf5e82649912784706cdc4872d4234
59186 F20110109_AABVGM grieb_m_Page_206.pro
18880abed8655fba4016362e0b2c3de4
7236ae54008d64ab6e126ddfa80fc2874006b913
5961 F20110109_AABUJU grieb_m_Page_175thm.jpg
2c03b340b6ef6ecbb7c1078206d277c2
9089c13abb3a14ef6de5c6e8420a7d9c49a5791e
53689 F20110109_AABVGN grieb_m_Page_207.pro
fe4fd6408831304ddd801486fbcf6ef9
4cd2341b6957e108b6f28944633a68ca821c13b8
56031 F20110109_AABUJV grieb_m_Page_176.pro
967c5daeb86c4991b7530a5f42433b67
e904e04bc116c8123a582cdcb0600dfef402b121
51611 F20110109_AABVGO grieb_m_Page_208.pro
f2a9b449273f7720663f60d4c5ccb447
5f1f818014e46c59b735ccad02c9681dde148f94
F20110109_AABUJW grieb_m_Page_179.tif
5096b2b9cb43a5dedbcdd0c1837554a0
7266cc8a2d1fa06caae24b41984b307179c638bb
48882 F20110109_AABVGP grieb_m_Page_212.pro
fb49bd7da355388eb52a69399f54fd4e
f497e2060bf1b0c6da4f5fdbf3bd63f2e25dc1c4
112994 F20110109_AABUJX grieb_m_Page_150.jp2
66711634800f44b6bc39e7dd53f81829
7a8acdda638d50bf20fba5762ea1d8f1f91648b8
4487 F20110109_AABVGQ grieb_m_Page_213.pro
1f377b67869879b99f554999bbad25ff
fd75bf2636bf7af5869f0d3ab2948ed34f9c4037
76763 F20110109_AABUJY grieb_m_Page_099.pro
720af9248d838c5aa7b840b406823ee2
b4c18cbd037f16e5f71791d0d2e631f4a0846254
58773 F20110109_AABVGR grieb_m_Page_216.pro
dd7fbb122af3d107bb1d3445d7a6c58a
94bb5d435ac0d8edf071c4b0ff1a607039cc9d1b
27256 F20110109_AABUJZ grieb_m_Page_206.QC.jpg
d82e68d0f26f59aa6cde98ce604d78bd
920367ebdb4ca61994a3b320793ee8bbe59ebad2
56862 F20110109_AABVGS grieb_m_Page_217.pro
894e415f980eaa00df99b6427c3af66e
6bcf82194d6086293e310b1c8d26ea60e89eb11d
55446 F20110109_AABVGT grieb_m_Page_219.pro
ea31265157abe255d24f8592b98f7aed
21114039b82dfa76e31e93205d99a5cbcef498cc
55230 F20110109_AABVGU grieb_m_Page_220.pro
34f2bee0f10302c66a32c6085679cb4a
4f118cf42a188a39372eccd08928e6c2b2436a27
6431 F20110109_AABTSA grieb_m_Page_160thm.jpg
755261064d960683ee73a100e65dcbb6
29296f7d59f1684703dcb0f12f0a1aa7a2476ff5
59815 F20110109_AABVGV grieb_m_Page_222.pro
95ce3069feac8d2a09847c694637c9c0
f06a151ed03cdd36efedbd1fef20cd3d75bfa583
F20110109_AABTSB grieb_m_Page_124.tif
a1522125a67d27159a6f7c091fb9ee71
f50f363f1ae8fefa22a151c3cb1b5cf2e61883d9
25717 F20110109_AABVGW grieb_m_Page_225.pro
4465e3cb3f4268350c3451726267c91e
e185a648b78fcc0869055e86b9b247f7f1de7844
86230 F20110109_AABTSC grieb_m_Page_080.jpg
dbbd4bd0518608489aebfc8e4165a1f9
630a172203b6d1d33e4c851715be5e48a9aa8c82
411 F20110109_AABVGX grieb_m_Page_001.txt
fe8873148e4997ec9179838e1e841b7e
ac730984929d550975ed81a85b21c8edf68b7884
72683 F20110109_AABTSD grieb_m_Page_164.pro
084ae3f2e9a9dd49381350e3724045a9
0c0abfa889fecafe066ade56ccc86a990171cb16
2340 F20110109_AABVGY grieb_m_Page_007.txt
9c8d0de43b0865c15426ba396876fb20
bfa2562890c6c1b6512bbf0cf5fc1c11eea58ad7
25407 F20110109_AABTSE grieb_m_Page_012.QC.jpg
7098ac4c90af2b55c971ce4c2a9af0f2
eb4e1355187f2fd4ffdfc38ca74ca4baf3cec496
1912 F20110109_AABVGZ grieb_m_Page_013.txt
6fedb38892baf450d156dbe47cdbe598
2c4dab9348d66a3602db92a66764eb5a331d49d4
F20110109_AABTSF grieb_m_Page_073.tif
c475613213f217eebeb672d96f3f9c48
77f092f87c3fd8edc5a0b61cc7ee5b43b865922e
85906 F20110109_AABTSG grieb_m_Page_208.jpg
92715cf85627fa0c1694b09596e0b0c4
c5f6e420571381dacd590858c21cf14e28831a65
15339 F20110109_AABTSH grieb_m_Page_007.QC.jpg
2019d4267bd3e0605527cfbfbee886b7
7a8d172f4e3530de1e5323c5ce98eed295c24bf5
107586 F20110109_AABUPA grieb_m_Page_013.jp2
f9d4479bd7a5a5d5967158d382a863c9
6f90c73028e18619fb76ec592192242f01b4baa4
6045 F20110109_AABTSI grieb_m_Page_212thm.jpg
59cb7225fd70596181f88596edf9a0d8
a91c0ebc54e16b63f2b2e819b86b2fd1d0a99131
76211 F20110109_AABUPB grieb_m_Page_092.pro
588cf263d3840537556dcbcea6ed359c
452b6e047c1fba46722c6f1f70665194781225cb
F20110109_AABTSJ grieb_m_Page_161.tif
b803725e91e3f0a439877ac9f5cb5e1f
a70496cced90b73e134e3cdbf645a2c6168c9551
2681 F20110109_AABUPC grieb_m_Page_031.txt
6e45fff907d0b1e4e0b3df1948256b7e
518dea3326d1443d6a69f86782104e19fabd065e
90871 F20110109_AABTSK grieb_m_Page_176.jpg
22d9c275582f4fee0a83f1d977dd9fef
eaa6e9dd72d34b1f9eceb04b5150522c44470e8d
66127 F20110109_AABUPD grieb_m_Page_037.pro
897ae6528f1263f54da23afe2a62b608
8168e95a11122c3152517a15ac66d744e3033aee
26933 F20110109_AABTSL grieb_m_Page_079.QC.jpg
fde8f2c48162a468f2ac7539a78cd22c
b3635b25e702f96da06b31af85bc86d1bfde0d64
F20110109_AABUPE grieb_m_Page_138.tif
2263717e290499496d840e76d11fa846
32cf1da132c234cb4abb343b38a9396cdcb45002
2362 F20110109_AABTSM grieb_m_Page_024.txt
15b6c6af00ce544fa2eac5677c2297d9
ab0bf007c7e60fb2c34168876884517dbb17dc6d
96279 F20110109_AABUPF grieb_m_Page_061.jpg
909b418c384102f9bf15a4174d397f9e
d038e5a8e4074e0a4e57e97b7470f839017a9439
26646 F20110109_AABTSN grieb_m_Page_024.QC.jpg
1b75954141b9b3f82c8c0d6204727e42
96a4bdb527ab056dcc2bce2cb5314109c6725522
56651 F20110109_AABUPG grieb_m_Page_111.pro
28b6a9dd0330ffb2aca582bde2280427
fbfc00c14657f8bd6030f6a5fe13e6d3aa20ad01
27825 F20110109_AABVMA grieb_m_Page_035.QC.jpg
c4b606ff34f89ab73f8c189bb0ef198a
cad9041683a2364b7d3ca5a3baa1d98c0ed0242c
119547 F20110109_AABTSO grieb_m_Page_083.jp2
be7218d9618dc4a4d8e4d853d9711776
e735739554582b4089dc1ea7e46ac939f4d4ce07
100739 F20110109_AABUPH grieb_m_Page_222.jpg
1480796fafb5dd352639c50179240772
9d8c7646b5ec1b497e21023bd12fd01927305bb7
26233 F20110109_AABVMB grieb_m_Page_036.QC.jpg
acbabe4519e49127b906bc978f24b543
aeb2667f219429694b658f45de173c9922da5ea1
23803 F20110109_AABUPI grieb_m_Page_021.QC.jpg
83fd0c9a1227064f1d159dbda4dc46fe
e45bddcc3a4618cbe59fc2b8fb05601f1e06dc79
28014 F20110109_AABVMC grieb_m_Page_037.QC.jpg
d55e9b9ce60c0b2a7c688fc3414d7b29
2e0d12d40300b3c61d7b60d52a02f9ec53497087
F20110109_AABTSP grieb_m_Page_053.tif
6d7aecfbc68cbffbdb7fd35260286ff8
96c0a102f94bf86e92c75a9c18d60f51cbd2b910
6327 F20110109_AABUPJ grieb_m_Page_031thm.jpg
0fead0db28ef02725505feb8ef80d889
3de34f436c41506f2afc342655e9e1727eeb5d93
6626 F20110109_AABVMD grieb_m_Page_037thm.jpg
0cd309b3df17495384c225b773b3fcff
b7cda68abe568a981a01d32fea3fb1e21d8c3852
91089 F20110109_AABTSQ grieb_m_Page_114.jpg
c6984d70382ea66959929c21ff0c4adf
c87912efb30986c66f07091457793faae248e6d3
27506 F20110109_AABUPK grieb_m_Page_155.QC.jpg
0232e2ccab6205c21fee644961a08c5d
4ca32b3d9bc18a6662c64400805075d596ff0c1b
28994 F20110109_AABVME grieb_m_Page_038.QC.jpg
bfb1b25ce9d62b3ce2c6c686fc6a54a0
924a9bc701f32772e72e2c6990bd6421a8465fa7
F20110109_AABTSR grieb_m_Page_093.tif
dc357fd2cd99b45449ecdb480a321435
b7dab2e32acc40d35e05350014d1abcaa4d5f47d
25514 F20110109_AABVMF grieb_m_Page_039.QC.jpg
e196b7e1a130509582c215adfeb2f518
cc5d8977e6b06ddcddadc27a5a5282b4551c0af3
F20110109_AABUCA grieb_m_Page_192.tif
e437c8a1b0a3b37cc448a7a697999b74
612daf4d6568ce063cfd79ad6298d80cfcb99ec6
51440 F20110109_AABTSS grieb_m_Page_191.pro
0f957dea9c128c404b98d10e54eb5d23
b9797819a961229ded7a6867aad5a2808f337197
F20110109_AABUPL grieb_m_Page_060.tif
4a1c94cdd38fca50601378a57c0b347f
ee76547833f8fb2882385960e701add57d55c324
26798 F20110109_AABVMG grieb_m_Page_040.QC.jpg
878d0f28650fae023916cd08a4d5e38d
5723768e0e86b55ee2c4ce0a97893e0ba33c07d7
26156 F20110109_AABUCB grieb_m_Page_191.QC.jpg
e5ab0586d269f9751f175298e4b2fd8f
121e7fc8777bbe7f00d1a65ef662108b0947a98d
6313 F20110109_AABTST grieb_m_Page_122thm.jpg
9a44751efc83e4237aa98221788244d7
db991420c04e1c3cebe4c8b467c31e7b695be711
142681 F20110109_AABUPM grieb_m_Page_099.jp2
a5c3341226b4625923de9b774196b19c
b7b3cb96c645f456f04f5d7f983ba87d6a7ca1fb
72873 F20110109_AABUCC grieb_m_Page_004.jpg
cc438ed1fbe452aadf0301164f9f960d
46aa1c30a3a6c1356e34bcea9dc801a93c5cbb6c
9193 F20110109_AABTSU grieb_m_Page_005.jp2
3e73b55683855a0563cb9b3a091fde21
7363839d444033118827fbf2b1ae27ca12e02ad4
101431 F20110109_AABUPN grieb_m_Page_161.jp2
850bb007c469ed2b2f9538dbbb94a315
bbbddb0f6b3fb8c6e0862f360b137078401191ed
6380 F20110109_AABVMH grieb_m_Page_040thm.jpg
ab5b97d91d436ce276bb095a5c2d6033
9f22784449b9e4c51d217f24424beaa871796571
6444 F20110109_AABUCD grieb_m_Page_104thm.jpg
f92dd7343a54004727ad29551658b5fb
3e5294d6128c9285679e887a63702872bc985c7c
60787 F20110109_AABTSV grieb_m_Page_140.pro
6e243fe5c68939af8266ea4716038135
208acbddedac8a4d66cf1a7604f1b84744cc06a2
26314 F20110109_AABUPO grieb_m_Page_115.QC.jpg
9fcad5f0b603739a17b499062244ee36
6a31e3522f3c8ffa50ebd32c82073a4f4049ed93
6254 F20110109_AABVMI grieb_m_Page_041thm.jpg
2da1a52dfcf7daed4f4eeb96db585108
2def5dd13c9d808966bc4e88b4864c4857930d1a
84270 F20110109_AABUCE grieb_m_Page_185.jpg
44ad00afbe64bf05f24a201c24431f3a
ebfb1fdf0c9f7ca21edda88aaa9698060a2280a2
6252 F20110109_AABTSW grieb_m_Page_075thm.jpg
35a643c5da63fe7ff59596cc8d57868e
6e357a09277805f87d152c85e9623d231dc92a44
96809 F20110109_AABUPP grieb_m_Page_119.jpg
28be708b8dafd6e050a523952dec2a6f
1325dc17e7a59d35d77ff5695c04efc806247235
26439 F20110109_AABVMJ grieb_m_Page_042.QC.jpg
16ec4c54ec8d33c1a2e295503417a840
7f95d07555f10873745a8604e5eac61d323c1cf6
52422 F20110109_AABUCF grieb_m_Page_090.pro
f54d3db0b457f8c95eed1b091c25b2c3
b82d85255c882d938ef312087f0c7617bb38c1e5
2184 F20110109_AABTSX grieb_m_Page_084.txt
286431c5298c30268f877fba18daff10
85fe4a0876e008b34e61477e75ca90ea862174cc
6224 F20110109_AABUPQ grieb_m_Page_050thm.jpg
f8c6fd8a6f3da6d2a13d71a83423ddcb
08705bdb4d4cb46097e8aeb8e26fcfc0aeac5d0f
25329 F20110109_AABVMK grieb_m_Page_043.QC.jpg
e3ad338c70d92710744062706aef37b1
01e04fa7f00cf7f9b2eddaf12a05a82d915cafd5
50094 F20110109_AABUCG grieb_m_Page_018.pro
5ef9a131bac99041b9a59a7887b1ac8f
dede4037f8da8f02cdc0d51ae258b34eb1f366d4
113985 F20110109_AABTSY grieb_m_Page_149.jp2
31aaeec4bf7f2ea77039bffaa06d557e
badc003955bd5a6a7dadf92555a933cc88bf5083
58188 F20110109_AABUPR grieb_m_Page_042.pro
10f32d8e3c80b6fcdf6245e3954f37cb
eb059e58f27d0973f2dea6ed5b6bacf4deed2c5e
29662 F20110109_AABVML grieb_m_Page_044.QC.jpg
3f74338a69867f94739f8cfae0c4633a
a76beed507a0a111cb42c898f7d14892f8365033
95615 F20110109_AABUCH grieb_m_Page_128.jp2
06d395784c47a79ad27283817d9f5ec1
fe55ba48bf56a5c759d903d2fb5b61334eca8589
84977 F20110109_AABTSZ grieb_m_Page_214.jpg
3cbfc703560dcb4d8f1c232199653c43
09b0bb6fb5ee6b9e5adfb38c96852ad67456127c
120734 F20110109_AABUPS grieb_m_Page_218.jp2
fa62905f83e681c134cabc59b609b1e5
f877e8978d6f5489b8ff3bf0ecd8c3436a401afe
26210 F20110109_AABVMM grieb_m_Page_047.QC.jpg
757dba8a169897220e5c03c1506ff3ea
a88440739eafeefa300c98e625360f82e9ebb275
120448 F20110109_AABUCI grieb_m_Page_215.jp2
e8888007ecc0b092f590328d93b039eb
f26070b376dbc9eed43b55fd3dc7957f4b0dec93
F20110109_AABUPT grieb_m_Page_202thm.jpg
3f44651b2c1bba3ea106071d7d46d797
bb30da40d72a9e1c2593f5984b6efba914f00938
6291 F20110109_AABVMN grieb_m_Page_047thm.jpg
3dd82df69fcfd31b938e0c6337cdde62
3296e987161862e1e54228979d39a585fb734190
6633 F20110109_AABUCJ grieb_m_Page_099thm.jpg
1e6dabedf407ce52319903fcc76c9751
3546bae801fff34f3cba6d0378883ae4958959bb
25512 F20110109_AABUPU grieb_m_Page_015.QC.jpg
95583a9db5fec837939961a9df698756
479a7a362be6281bf57749f672765379a22803e2
28132 F20110109_AABVMO grieb_m_Page_048.QC.jpg
af0e5009b53b46a14792d8adce961bf1
1333436d57307904c08a32f62870c996b5f23c2e
52068 F20110109_AABUCK grieb_m_Page_178.pro
08126f40652da8168ba3468ae5eb0f38
d8e7b5f9bdc2f08e5a55f063b4b6c855ba05d921
F20110109_AABUPV grieb_m_Page_058.tif
dba1426009d26222491f0b759ee5ce5f
1ba41f53f2225cb46f9ddd4899cb26ccb2127d01
6562 F20110109_AABVMP grieb_m_Page_048thm.jpg
d23be13c393d155b614df14fed038ce3
0ca81339bd5740561ee52bc7887a76980964a62f
6558 F20110109_AABUCL grieb_m_Page_220thm.jpg
dbd94f5694be1332a84cb5eea2b8e149
275358701fa8e9b826b868262c34709ae5a630f7
95568 F20110109_AABUPW grieb_m_Page_056.jpg
817881f17c6a10cf1fd177b0efa5d9d0
6c41efdc50b9b5520a95dd367f8c75dd3d479da8
27991 F20110109_AABVMQ grieb_m_Page_049.QC.jpg
d9344158489f1cd140fa9fec411875df
812c53331a3f72ef4e1f72dc3705add525f27488
6143 F20110109_AABUCM grieb_m_Page_039thm.jpg
9083e38e895626dccbdc123a50e3556e
ec969b0e0026cf5ec4944cf0e2b265d7fa04c417
F20110109_AABUPX grieb_m_Page_204.tif
658e2ff939aa6c6a87cffb4ae852179a
c10f3ff6046e2b3551e7680707baf0fd993af933
6494 F20110109_AABVMR grieb_m_Page_049thm.jpg
93b634de848528ff4b4453f9ac45553b
1c5a4aa96e121f89de7235d9caebfa5049ab6474
F20110109_AABUCN grieb_m_Page_014.tif
8e02319cfaa80fcfa3d02cfe83487872
21b8a41e25210da6fab97d72f6c7bc5faedb1060
2803 F20110109_AABUPY grieb_m_Page_138.txt
ddf48e1d2a8837858ad5daeb5175c8d4
8b31f600a97e242c089a573bca45b2678b3ea3af
28174 F20110109_AABVMS grieb_m_Page_051.QC.jpg
84cb778ffeb31421ca604950b4b85075
ede3dc5bb01c1613ed14318868ac391ade669897
50116 F20110109_AABUCO grieb_m_Page_014.pro
647c6cedce67a855f2a8e6541432d39b
204ddf613845bdfd60b5d80dc04dd570d4e5516a
2261 F20110109_AABUPZ grieb_m_Page_058.txt
72d0de1c00bb9a341e19602411e89620
31e06ff76343a73584330a9f04b886814586b830
6509 F20110109_AABVMT grieb_m_Page_051thm.jpg
a26cd1e5e9878c9459fbcd852955d4a8
f1c79887450fb686d8f4f92244534088fe2daca8
2389 F20110109_AABUCP grieb_m_Page_088.txt
bfa600f4002f7fba9001cdb6820d9ed1
70e90fdbc25608b4a9a95493e620086f35a74f92
6408 F20110109_AABVMU grieb_m_Page_052thm.jpg
31c3f1322db4f559558d2db321b331e0
dc2add9b49fa56347b237fb538dfe84646c8ed00
F20110109_AABTYA grieb_m_Page_022.tif
81b46f5d6310e45526a7574efe3f787b
8ea8c63e85571a0e5ec23b9bf9dcc5e05df66c64
2227 F20110109_AABUCQ grieb_m_Page_218.txt
1d171cb60515543e5a1ae14e5da2e053
45e85e829cf5ae1f6fe091dbc25fc84e7bdb7c96
26869 F20110109_AABVMV grieb_m_Page_053.QC.jpg
2caf86915d38bca7e652b023581d68a9
5f3f753f92042d8ebe9a1967d2dd1e8b20ad2d83
52626 F20110109_AABTYB grieb_m_Page_117.pro
3b742731d7d7627d57fe79a910a765ac
562f759487898141b59f4beb02e8efa61864d199
12793 F20110109_AABUCR grieb_m_Page_213.jp2
36baa2b108505127d8d0e823dadb66dd
9b4fd5766d70abd8ffdfce87a0963be6cea29022
6508 F20110109_AABVMW grieb_m_Page_053thm.jpg
ec8f3250a2fed6e56e8566c918ebfc44
95f2b4cc7b1200e1cc14664f2ec51f3f90816457
F20110109_AABTYC grieb_m_Page_036.tif
d6cac8ea737ad07ceb9e96d1d66ccb48
af6b333cfd994fd4297b846126fce8b37954462e
2482 F20110109_AABUCS grieb_m_Page_148.txt
29a544a5d2ac3569f9f4a86f6adeb3c4
fee8b579a561c8bc460c4268d252f39a6873db20
25216 F20110109_AABVMX grieb_m_Page_054.QC.jpg
341ffde78024bad32833b0dd056735fb
935509a15ab6665ffe19828a4f498d2969a59dbc
3730 F20110109_AABTYD grieb_m_Page_162thm.jpg
03aaf59b680028d9e9f638400e3f7d65
e7c873f0dbe779853178c6f92e0687547c8e588a
6555 F20110109_AABUCT grieb_m_Page_164thm.jpg
052acfc269b514f7f13919b40b131289
352a72f2b1b3517e076fc23bcc9c84db3bf5669e
27276 F20110109_AABVMY grieb_m_Page_055.QC.jpg
ed55a6115181e75eae9a0cc0101fb1d5
c49a7d689861c37d2963322bc6576b9a5413c005
119534 F20110109_AABTYE grieb_m_Page_047.jp2
7daa82957d357ae41879c4c0f084ab1c
4c463bd73a19b08fb8b9e1ab8113553682a38867
52819 F20110109_AABUCU grieb_m_Page_189.pro
630868eb81d11d4964743bacf5fe401c
e0f675d0ab6cd0c992861559a4cdc80b8e4553da
6235 F20110109_AABVMZ grieb_m_Page_055thm.jpg
497f37d2769adb8ea9da39860a53a781
b5c6af7809e513e4a5a27256f312121b4d50ab97
62846 F20110109_AABTYF grieb_m_Page_172.pro
80fb64d4dc4e3a5af9bab7bc230b1a7b
71a42b31dcca4fdf547f9c08b580aaea7358fbf4
5983 F20110109_AABUCV grieb_m_Page_097thm.jpg
67be8e7d6cdd650afc36d480cd5e57c4
11de6a29a2e02378eaad6e0ae36f1b159eaf7af8
6724 F20110109_AABTYG grieb_m_Page_201thm.jpg
6018f44dfc8b1f2a76a1eef4217f2d63
c057ae27b98ea4920f53fb6d0a14367d37bda1ce
121701 F20110109_AABUCW grieb_m_Page_101.jp2
c27a837d07d6d87c6b0f4be307823f93
3d1663ef40157e539d2105d42b1901eba1414f08
109454 F20110109_AABTYH grieb_m_Page_177.jp2
949acf28b0ddda9faa5d3dcc3257e4a7
570b0f17cc7ba7eeeb8785ee5e511723c0a476ec
24971 F20110109_AABUCX grieb_m_Page_178.QC.jpg
03369b31aaeb669a89d6d60e2b5325b9
27abf77a2add5733b3cf0cf75bc95de27c3fce70
90059 F20110109_AABUVA grieb_m_Page_195.jpg
b0ffe33fee789eaa7fbff6158ee06321
d6dcc6bc6369b39aa25c74b20ffe27cb927a8599
86784 F20110109_AABTYI grieb_m_Page_198.jpg
7325d66101fe93f9040e7aaeddbb9522
c3a290a0f11385bf70b695779a1b6f0ad57c8900
63696 F20110109_AABUCY grieb_m_Page_194.pro
72b6ab161c332e6fb9ff9ce41fda8196
a1a4e1e561da0b367a765057a429c3c342f2c560
86215 F20110109_AABUVB grieb_m_Page_196.jpg
3c7f3c82dd43baf65d259b2496f41312
8832bb962778e68df598d180e9c554b222a759f9
6469 F20110109_AABTYJ grieb_m_Page_114thm.jpg
5b1375e593dc72f7055699f529ff1ba1
fd845523a3d0cf6110010c6e3e9b27bb475c58ba
27687 F20110109_AABUCZ grieb_m_Page_194.QC.jpg
37bbe48e3891e51aca8d4d328da3c181
060d13b1fba5632e9269608199868d8d082e5609
86780 F20110109_AABUVC grieb_m_Page_197.jpg
64f397e030d5c6f18f2cef449697a952
f2646c9d6ae467b543db485a4bc54c655bcba467
48208 F20110109_AABTYK grieb_m_Page_162.jpg
50b16ac246aa9d9f6bf94609b6b17f04
643ce4afaf2dc48e31e232be4a2236405064b772
F20110109_AABUVD grieb_m_Page_199.jpg
08e0a35f8b441bc9257ac6cc17b71080
affc2b3d135e6448741edbb39a1cd6a5940952c4
F20110109_AABTYL grieb_m_Page_078.QC.jpg
2170da28f3e70002581067a0c255766f
b9208388ad1bbdf3760f9cdc08cd9b05fc106e8f
93267 F20110109_AABUVE grieb_m_Page_202.jpg
c157daacb41ed091094e1b68b84e0168
b1be1c89d83a034481bcb4e3e669e1d030d17f31
6539 F20110109_AABTLA grieb_m_Page_151thm.jpg
c0e60d2c2345aa1fb19cb2d1c30e8b94
904411e20efce6d5dd3f1dad8cc74c81e417cb24
F20110109_AABTYM grieb_m_Page_144.tif
1898449becfd970464a40964dd9d6265
1cb4cbba8440fc38e373e2201db29a765463b1ac
98144 F20110109_AABUVF grieb_m_Page_204.jpg
6b26996afb3653fe7004bdce0870ff98
87e4c2b7b11258ad1899eaf454392d68102a4818
2074 F20110109_AABTLB grieb_m_Page_112.txt
e410af6aa41bc7b3cbb1d5eddd3d931b
fccb2a87cd9125bc5be6148e608d8a8ddbb90e96
150614 F20110109_AABTYN grieb_m_Page_200.jp2
7deffcc8ce54897541be0846389d852b
295799987ddb9dbe70ca6a56fc832b75bf0c80cb
85044 F20110109_AABUVG grieb_m_Page_207.jpg
5a19c90fc60e5331a85e265321a0ab2e
610740af9c6e57bf11bfb9c99abfe840b9b5c299
82304 F20110109_AABTLC grieb_m_Page_026.jpg
4dcfd46ed1a37087c630f829839febea
6f3ff3057357588b7d88f1e5faff9f62fac5e874
26011 F20110109_AABTYO grieb_m_Page_122.QC.jpg
caaa55b75aaa7550018f7605b5002995
38ce9d56fa823bf2ee647a1541cfd79c7acb2aa0
85593 F20110109_AABUVH grieb_m_Page_210.jpg
e5d7d873143290ae96dd78b97721806d
76708474d2507b156a32d95342a8b93a3ab5a9b6
26720 F20110109_AABVSA grieb_m_Page_204.QC.jpg
1e375a0180cae522bc402e3fe9cd58a8
21861cdef487ba1bc3cfc546b7580fdee0240f38
2417 F20110109_AABTLD grieb_m_Page_125.txt
8c557c510ee6347c6cc0f3031a0f3c01
8f18757c2871ad4cbe4df242c305b2e49c3b5074
F20110109_AABTYP grieb_m_Page_138.QC.jpg
629ea2f7ce3175d50c44782e1dfb3dd4
cf694ddb52dd116a809058a26d0292f139a8c876
85418 F20110109_AABUVI grieb_m_Page_211.jpg
b09bbdc0a059312974071fecb06a8298
26ce7cbc6f23224b41937af978010d6aa96aa66d
F20110109_AABVSB grieb_m_Page_204thm.jpg
09b2ec47aec4b19439441579a0364397
748b6ae655bc8799991389d2f21c92b803dd053a
F20110109_AABTLE grieb_m_Page_115thm.jpg
606b530f156fba697d4b62ba97e9c801
42288d36318322f0849e7e08566832d1249ae4db
1997 F20110109_AABTYQ grieb_m_Page_057.txt
b3037c8459ba4cdb329966f95fbc741f
984f95f9e0e62f068b7d931517380af700a93347
10143 F20110109_AABUVJ grieb_m_Page_213.jpg
686b68067d0197aa601f370c70d09d59
01c6180c8e146bb744cd41d6fe5650896720b016
26978 F20110109_AABVSC grieb_m_Page_205.QC.jpg
d9a57a2f332d601561de62b9bc52fcdf
19e33de6b8111c98d2d319f7fd9e62b6498ad518
56791 F20110109_AABTLF grieb_m_Page_045.pro
b168d4f73d66ba45d19bacf1bc821de3
0b27a069b25cf1c84f874f0e1e2af3218b14c49b
60063 F20110109_AABTYR grieb_m_Page_147.pro
844487b8cad12e8458b62b616722e734
094747516f6c2b6ac4e0f6752e6974b606342492
94053 F20110109_AABUVK grieb_m_Page_216.jpg
35a2f2471e8f18debee2da21a480087a
27532bf9ab0cb86022309521401b8974c03ef56e
6443 F20110109_AABVSD grieb_m_Page_205thm.jpg
8f92793cfe71d1a5472eda7d827cabc2
c91fa9202b825261d68af17a052a4f3a83ec5bd9
71147 F20110109_AABTLG grieb_m_Page_022.pro
794f1e2b102b636444098752f87f5878
f2e9c02e2f5d343cf18c2cda8430f043b123f895
6225 F20110109_AABUIA grieb_m_Page_060thm.jpg
aec6a5e42a4fbbd9eb5fa951b21a6b01
d93be64fe05e9cb190c5367af44273741ecb452a
126410 F20110109_AABTYS grieb_m_Page_223.jp2
b99e8b65e7a1d0387a7e1d33e71f7707
04aa3d789ee4a3a6d0acbc29046300ee45b6dc7d
89282 F20110109_AABUVL grieb_m_Page_218.jpg
8928ba5369e275a42c8dc63d5765d5a6
0caf20a2ea96762d48d7e708d578805f40962219
6515 F20110109_AABVSE grieb_m_Page_206thm.jpg
bf8495e8fc4de0a2421c6652e021ae6e
51115fae4b40022c605aa94f2b422bc3e4ec2154
6264 F20110109_AABTLH grieb_m_Page_026thm.jpg
5747ae959e3467029f9017835c42926b
a232361c5465400091f77b08025f333706d7fc28
149480 F20110109_AABUIB grieb_m_Page_193.jp2
dd4f2fd9fea7b982f88e04d14dd0203b
c0fdea4125e39224b81bbb2045ae7ba574b88a1f
25777 F20110109_AABTYT grieb_m_Page_144.QC.jpg
ac8d7151da226cf3e5e78074efc49307
447428af1dedae1076edb6c913673edef3721f98
94280 F20110109_AABUVM grieb_m_Page_220.jpg
ac9d314d8ff615c0f151fe0828868232
7d97ed6477c27c277f3b478c5ddba0a62fc8bdad
6406 F20110109_AABVSF grieb_m_Page_207thm.jpg
5ebb2203e2f1ce72b8eb47d41f11fd96
10ff2e7f6a90ce65d257ba9817161c820510d105
F20110109_AABUIC grieb_m_Page_141.tif
dbea161438c4c8fa55625af89db71153
bbb97b79a36e95e8420e2eb661a581f21ce3c9a4
113034 F20110109_AABTYU grieb_m_Page_182.jp2
6c096e51d37c652ea6031d9bc13fac1d
0e1b7af267c9284b4c250eefd1bfd91c57e027bd
96252 F20110109_AABUVN grieb_m_Page_223.jpg
f4bfd1f6774199db16c1bf1426cbd07c
453d6b65ac6b80dc38cef14fd1bc9c5bca99f09c
26831 F20110109_AABVSG grieb_m_Page_208.QC.jpg
4fa5ab06246feacb3c29e6e96b0332e8
b527851e686b3d9e12a1dddef6c544391a4e8b5a
2278 F20110109_AABTLI grieb_m_Page_078.txt
27ede0f9cf30af0560464856d38b282b
f18d4587d66900ec6b2388f0a48dc01d1ee59eb3
94018 F20110109_AABUID grieb_m_Page_048.jpg
1aa33b88cc463a07d2ca3a75ac456c2b
76097f93cf622c4375709ef7c0290d8838a5ba09
63096 F20110109_AABUVO grieb_m_Page_224.jpg
efc3f0426e98a87bb0dcc092fab8da8e
bf625ec0238e4396fe1f845b44491bd51e8e770c
6106 F20110109_AABVSH grieb_m_Page_209thm.jpg
9fa556198b87ba14e560e64114b035bc
7d57e42dae1b1ad0c4840356c9ed0f64bca3f59c
2248 F20110109_AABTLJ grieb_m_Page_083.txt
eee6e73e8aba4aea2b818a374b2be0a7
9d237414fb8820a060e39db756e58d32ce198c2d
F20110109_AABTYV grieb_m_Page_010.tif
7b2bd4443395ffd5ea478f615a3b72e3
1b556fef7ac7208fff702fea4e6ebb74a147f120
46776 F20110109_AABUVP grieb_m_Page_225.jpg
2d75dbfc259b939d7f0d8e77ded45fa5
3e98e905f32dcf0bad50ad1a9bfbf111ddb3bd2b
26942 F20110109_AABVSI grieb_m_Page_210.QC.jpg
5b3f06e620b0a8cbe3dd20b300c45776
520668ca229cac263eee5c02f2e0a15490b41040
124169 F20110109_AABTLK grieb_m_Page_052.jp2
abad2023c6efbf9db924ec4bd3c28ccc
eb7bd8cc1028b4b861c62350f1e9a10272aa7987
6240 F20110109_AABUIE grieb_m_Page_137thm.jpg
3efd88f1d58b3bff4f0785a1158821c5
9c952d515f1600925ea1f33e7142963d1e90ee38
80928 F20110109_AABTYW grieb_m_Page_100.jpg
3beb7f8ebfc4eff9728fc0ee560b1990
06a4a6cb6f36b831901a2653e3cb81c58e8b16b8
5509 F20110109_AABUVQ grieb_m_Page_002.jp2
39daec7ce3160ac0bdfb6b713cc11915
d3194e7542e9988dc5e9fc45299ae8fd88240f96
26349 F20110109_AABVSJ grieb_m_Page_211.QC.jpg
5c9965cd60aa36d494dc2948b5b33962
78ffea2f6dc509c233e17ca7f58a4778a7960cea
48027 F20110109_AABTLL grieb_m_Page_214.pro
e50b8ddaa4a87d7ccd24c57511742950
dea2bba3a3be6251eeb7c968d2c87f5d5763dd40
55610 F20110109_AABUIF grieb_m_Page_155.pro
8a7aeb8d6008623ecc89ca30d1428eb2
0cf3c101ff1a8fe5778fce2edc0805e08b37af36
2315 F20110109_AABTYX grieb_m_Page_041.txt
f5055a0fc32097f5577769a8a70788ca
4d35138a561607da4f2ffdb1a877756e06aa524e
6580 F20110109_AABVSK grieb_m_Page_211thm.jpg
db6f3f4319237943b71628976fcc8c89
61154961e42993ccf8dc50bfb5a0d19c32cc364f
2538 F20110109_AABTLM grieb_m_Page_130.txt
2014aa012c2df62cf5b3157f79e4169a
639b00f7bef70eb71681206948a372488e5fb9c1
F20110109_AABUIG grieb_m_Page_054.tif
e77de404f4b1b06cd344b1e4aa77e4cb
b06d6e0c4faad0c2d2ca51c9412f78b89ac5eeb3
1520806 F20110109_AABTYY grieb_m.pdf
d494daefbb9649ee9a5fadd776010dd3
1e218e885792c811048a5720ef1ceb67e49110a0
93913 F20110109_AABUVR grieb_m_Page_004.jp2
0ef8275918b5b719402a9fa7b8615af3
d03bd4a3fbf41dc85bd2ded89ec850ac6ea0c198
24619 F20110109_AABVSL grieb_m_Page_212.QC.jpg
0355c601d8907c5a21026ea7c59cf1c6
d2c9d3ad02b1a0ecbe0cbb9cdee25811ee62f23f
F20110109_AABTLN grieb_m_Page_205.tif
16a59f45d0678c1ce85f05c7399fd17e
cc500cc2a3b307e598c54d3d041295b481457e39
F20110109_AABUIH grieb_m_Page_028.tif
3a552a311c868ad78a4f0bc4c89bd797
13dc42f33e9c77d0961b3d9945fe750736469af0
49827 F20110109_AABTYZ grieb_m_Page_054.pro
648dd540eb0050f4379282e1264c75cb
216f67fc84dda7df08b1a17d2a56c44ce571e22a
51482 F20110109_AABVFA grieb_m_Page_109.pro
ccd90bc6054cb8cff3cfa7da0f5fe27b
ae09643c64999fd54b09f7582e9eaca16650afc7
1051930 F20110109_AABUVS grieb_m_Page_006.jp2
ec21e9b269933edca6ed30c29376e185
d7a2bb92eac9a1f68345c7e07e798d87d633452d
993 F20110109_AABVSM grieb_m_Page_213thm.jpg
772bf8af7b7410101b9ed5f79e7c3f7a
ac8830807b2055f799dcc2fad483b53c1379c479
91429 F20110109_AABTLO grieb_m_Page_047.jpg
8d3e52574a0fbdd6588c64a87b0c96f8
d178136eb0a883184ac3117b5cfacef2475cd00a
6891 F20110109_AABUII grieb_m_Page_200thm.jpg
01a1f2948a565b3b9c765c0e63ea399b
638271b95c261b0802cf8fd2c3900ca5edf6cb63
48752 F20110109_AABVFB grieb_m_Page_113.pro
e510bb507d6661c49cee77a74cccb732
28280ecaaa517176baf8f8f01c13f8ede3cc2e8b
1051973 F20110109_AABUVT grieb_m_Page_007.jp2
faab1d8ec11957d9e312d841090d518e
914b7d6eebbe3924cab033edf232820140e74218
81145 F20110109_AABTLP grieb_m_Page_032.jpg
8b57ef608e57f09727d6287e38050c72
488343741c16846bd32802575c29ab612cca89af
111727 F20110109_AABUIJ grieb_m_Page_142.jp2
041b60a0a077d4d4676432f213d92cb0
b129424ad18bdad71bd5b39bb49d96ad6fca8d52
51834 F20110109_AABVFC grieb_m_Page_115.pro
0e6d696eaafd76ccf2eb64f97e166429
e66090283bf6bf5df43b95708b802b4a6cd44fbd
90086 F20110109_AABUVU grieb_m_Page_008.jp2
716e89f8fa39582e70e57f1cbb2c7ac1
ce64e4daf6fdc82ef363a328e037c22a896ce3f4
23529 F20110109_AABVSN grieb_m_Page_214.QC.jpg
c285702d05aed12fc06ecdb6fdd37058
a77cca976e5f3bdf6a61c7f119b774ae3addcb48
48598 F20110109_AABTLQ grieb_m_Page_161.pro
803c2f06c78773a1a16af4de264c5d75
51afb9de060a671df819ff354e05cdf936efe636
3693 F20110109_AABUIK grieb_m_Page_213.QC.jpg
c09767123551f0a85d9daa53a90acd72
66e05861284a28c45d06540778e4ffe193f3bd4d
47580 F20110109_AABVFD grieb_m_Page_118.pro
7adea5a2b7ad792d46d103a4f4ca39b3
5579ecb57ab5ae453318fe35c30ccd5d7088e833
109441 F20110109_AABUVV grieb_m_Page_019.jp2
85587115c49bf2fa07fb730acd37c833
2547283c7c18f88810e842e7bc3129fdbc54b256
26326 F20110109_AABVSO grieb_m_Page_215.QC.jpg
5fc10b814e68ed92dcebf9da187ae106
c7e0d1259b67fcc32188026bc006f280f7716e69
3728 F20110109_AABTLR grieb_m_Page_225thm.jpg
1875f9da1cb1d537c7c5cc12423aab70
134c6cfd41eafc7e9d3c09e83c11256c27d61bf4
26415 F20110109_AABUIL grieb_m_Page_134.QC.jpg
470651a2bd96956eb8354ad1886aa075
16ba2d1c94f7ef4e918249a0499889ea3f948448
50792 F20110109_AABVFE grieb_m_Page_121.pro
cd84ea81a5910dbd3af975385ed08580
c1863068837689b1f77996cdd440c1ef0db364b6
129106 F20110109_AABUVW grieb_m_Page_022.jp2
fdc08912dfc5b98925283bdae9bd970c
c05debb285cd39e597a7862273c34a48485ed2c7
26127 F20110109_AABVSP grieb_m_Page_216.QC.jpg
297e3d34a26bab7e7e7c07cd0cc82278
84891e9f4a4532a50f43805b03b4d88012bb034d
F20110109_AABTLS grieb_m_Page_065.tif
c924169b688f57d3c69ee7939958585c
b7938ea939c1d9584a56dee77658b904e1c5a919
85014 F20110109_AABUIM grieb_m_Page_135.jpg
23e90f25ca46b8eff022774d8b6b6e1a
f37073223814a86d1d60cf727e27d1a776720ef7
62451 F20110109_AABVFF grieb_m_Page_125.pro
c0b8aad19bbdfa429fbdaa848ee49b6d
8f3924ad75d4cd6839dbf6492134c214b8791c23
118615 F20110109_AABUVX grieb_m_Page_024.jp2
c408102ca3d81bda69134ae3d77e042a
278fa04c6c4201d9151e284ad77724d5bc604f72
6337 F20110109_AABVSQ grieb_m_Page_218thm.jpg
d5ad1c9be864167c29351fd112ec65fa
91dd3656b7fc4edba80295319b38111190229d36
28677 F20110109_AABTLT grieb_m_Page_061.QC.jpg
7d3697ac3c622ddde00c6d92e6c89133
6569b28063a8773b4f951b79850fba79807466ea
82168 F20110109_AABUIN grieb_m_Page_178.jpg
f0bdd084441c19efc1ffad0b53a54464
27c2da423a7dca2e0272d941eff479c350e915c9
57710 F20110109_AABVFG grieb_m_Page_126.pro
7412025c468baf8231aceea7095f44c6
12aedf192d7db5e457a381d560dfb508ab3c7280
106426 F20110109_AABUVY grieb_m_Page_032.jp2
eb30948a4d7f701926980c1c604c9c58
909be94b41bb50cc3101960d9f2d0cfffa062ad4
26520 F20110109_AABVSR grieb_m_Page_219.QC.jpg
79fd69e1f2532f8b4ff16d3f4b479779
42a3847b38caa33438f557b6953d32db7c7dc831
123303 F20110109_AABTLU grieb_m_Page_069.jp2
e1deeb6e012f68b3869434e5f6273283
712218ae57ac61b31b18765ff1b940309a31e716
84466 F20110109_AABUIO grieb_m_Page_123.jpg
bde2f6328c00dbac69c43ace6417f6f9
749e96ba974c91e2339daa44f9764b0e05717ef4
46342 F20110109_AABVFH grieb_m_Page_127.pro
af0f22a3a67c48672fae7348edb48a53
af748c93a538c458041b949d04edbf6568699f24
117051 F20110109_AABUVZ grieb_m_Page_034.jp2
79874cbceb61b355ce1cbe549d9c030e
6792f3f2538dbeb802ba0a5d4173425ab4874167
F20110109_AABVSS grieb_m_Page_219thm.jpg
510bb4ed7b9b899cee70cdd1f43028e2
6037c5421779671cd26d919d710412c5ccd17816
2661 F20110109_AABTLV grieb_m_Page_119.txt
67a7b1ab4484d3f10b5cb62517e530d7
9988f1c1530023f92cd576867b18bf0938fa1640
113866 F20110109_AABUIP grieb_m_Page_086.jp2
4f27578f3ff2662ca4e43506673a89e9
fdc06d8b42a0d6295be466ee5756e14da9023e09
72048 F20110109_AABVFI grieb_m_Page_129.pro
5b8f22a80551955821628632d613da8e
ce41f5097c56b5c6f25742d9a565c64d23447054
27012 F20110109_AABVST grieb_m_Page_220.QC.jpg
024612d3f8342bd1f1d024f6059dffd6
4940729497055994fbd0f90b8ff5b00fe7028ccf
F20110109_AABTLW grieb_m_Page_084.tif
50fb97651e2921e38195c6ee994a991f
342e898f09f3652d403d1d0a839d40e2e41fb9c7
114192 F20110109_AABUIQ grieb_m_Page_036.jp2
d87e2eda09720e4fa661c1181bb15cfa
d68b485d954b1ab7b54736886715fd0da3766b1a
51907 F20110109_AABVFJ grieb_m_Page_132.pro
c9d09fbfecf76253d73b775480b86d8d
8538f4565bc43c524d24e021db1b64faec047ee9
6658 F20110109_AABVSU grieb_m_Page_221thm.jpg
d64ec9619c8bddfaaaee9e5821f81c19
36892344173a363fe49e27165b6098b58752dd8c
26401 F20110109_AABTLX grieb_m_Page_086.QC.jpg
e7d5d56b9ba1997c5f9820fc2a8e3510
cdb87446db730b4e7d14171c6ec92803789f82ed
21184 F20110109_AABUIR grieb_m_Page_128.QC.jpg
beb07ca3042198e6a878ade3ad20f3f1
78e1ed9792041f782a4f0a27165f0a6923028600
54227 F20110109_AABVFK grieb_m_Page_134.pro
8096773e4811ff5f2b9c8bdc75e52457
f3b4c11de27034d5875290ae1b2e9ed72b00ef42
6396 F20110109_AABVSV grieb_m_Page_222thm.jpg
5e7a2c05d0ea6295898f949eaab5eeee
976ef651cdb17c36658cf94355a04b7d681d85e9
50028 F20110109_AABTLY grieb_m_Page_177.pro
49fe1ba47dcc054b81fb328701635869
973df8c8e08bf9fcb968e75d513dcedcb5e71fb7
F20110109_AABUIS grieb_m_Page_115.tif
5cd836b3531c4d1e0e8c934b4d9e6723
5eed696473abe0656f369e75995c3b5ed0c63b31
56545 F20110109_AABVFL grieb_m_Page_137.pro
05e8d81a898e3a75d93e5c7a9912c8f4
77cfda5ab798e834bb96b21fa5f0c5989b216764
18289 F20110109_AABVSW grieb_m_Page_224.QC.jpg
c91096ea3561ef0a08bd7254f9e5b82a
94be51bc5fbe798526844583d4366f4dec4957d2
106076 F20110109_AABTLZ grieb_m_Page_173.jp2
a0918cd28365a315bfb8ea315a1bd29c
c874f6f9f73737d851c9535629c8ee2b494f1e9b
F20110109_AABUIT grieb_m_Page_072thm.jpg
a023e39ae25ed62021aa1e7034da92df
e19c657a1b549adf574a1b7a37ef5a081484b70b
53637 F20110109_AABVFM grieb_m_Page_139.pro
ec64396c0278f8b6ae68474efc3c3d5d
e76639ba00d0d80e0d31cfcb4f57731a76bc06df
256808 F20110109_AABVSX UFE0000690_00001.mets FULL
861cbc0737251225ae1992e321e87543
f70ea4ad3d18b263dd71f74758befae80db8fb50
58083 F20110109_AABUIU grieb_m_Page_046.pro
cefd4f3e5b20b13c26dcebfa25589042
66925f8ac364a8992b40ba8452019feb7d57da60
52243 F20110109_AABVFN grieb_m_Page_142.pro
5aee8233e4b117869dbedf94b44f8fdd
b16ce37d4a0ac526fc708d66fba2d90ce47bf662
28514 F20110109_AABUIV grieb_m_Page_099.QC.jpg
2b1a2baf6b7f52a4932d42fc3574d4ed
91c911d33bc1f0af0798574b1c8cfa02b38d1646
54602 F20110109_AABVFO grieb_m_Page_146.pro
6516812fd8261187f3bdbb35f48482b9
637597b1914278a03ab688f6ba473de2672c529a
51909 F20110109_AABUIW grieb_m_Page_136.pro
643df19d4279291ecbeb57b206f44ad0
1361f20574aa2ca8008de473ce4b342e677a6acd
56236 F20110109_AABVFP grieb_m_Page_150.pro
022b107d7c23bc3c322f65e275fcbad5
acdcee7485288df5e60db74a59173759ae1b2beb
1882 F20110109_AABUIX grieb_m_Page_020.txt
a1adf5b0f8de609fa9d181f583fd0491
c583211568cc95bbae94ac46b00041a30eec65b6
58734 F20110109_AABVFQ grieb_m_Page_152.pro
200ec1c058559601c3c3a6f9d23fc061
1eaff6795a2e92b10c90f0d9785727ce67fac35c
125259 F20110109_AABUIY grieb_m_Page_061.jp2
fb29ebeb20bee6c1919326cd88127654
f34e291e42efbcb0e3ba6c265304a038b70625fa
50619 F20110109_AABVFR grieb_m_Page_154.pro
caf9a53cbcaeb62f1d6112c4145ad824
9f442191b60bdb74e7b8a267efa597b5cc2f4650
53619 F20110109_AABUIZ grieb_m_Page_218.pro
7d2ac360a6c6d3b664ec248216e54ed1
5eeda052c30742142954a25ff12b822e692f468d
60234 F20110109_AABVFS grieb_m_Page_158.pro
438e6185e8ee850d76fb8e8f5663fa9c
541b9bb36eb8de5d711b55659e220339eac84fae
49154 F20110109_AABVFT grieb_m_Page_159.pro
0bcd2b5c4520042a283ef2fa549c3401
bcf267c15a268a459820c986f57369d7f42c47a8
45698 F20110109_AABVFU grieb_m_Page_163.pro
b36bd1f8a265d9c26ba2ced2f1fbe00e
ba944043265485a6e2054ac381640d7ddb22873c
111176 F20110109_AABTRA grieb_m_Page_109.jp2
11813be85f8104b8b2fd13d2b5c815f2
d5098acb9858db908a630f7fc6ec77b47d7ea0ef
50349 F20110109_AABVFV grieb_m_Page_166.pro
f816af922bb01d72503c8f7090e0e9ec
48fbeff6ee17952976f9d50fb0d27d19be246af5
F20110109_AABTRB grieb_m_Page_134.tif
07c5ecd0c0b94110cb0e378cfc7f0184
bf709260dda628ac50be55ac0c330dc8d353ba23
71224 F20110109_AABVFW grieb_m_Page_167.pro
42a273f5adaab6f591587c8479bc73cf
d69d880d4fce410c986e2a0d5a9813c666e4b472
119663 F20110109_AABTRC grieb_m_Page_174.jp2
3bbb01d41c71b593ac6cddadd9d0124f
86c619cdaf279cda801924d8a820b7fa17a9368d
53065 F20110109_AABVFX grieb_m_Page_168.pro
47712147fa612f09d0aab2971144cf88
7d11f30c8e312552f2d3ad92d23230efeec79b83
62651 F20110109_AABTRD grieb_m_Page_035.pro
c0ccb49cf02b0a1a4266095d600a5fb8
921845bf1c4d5461e6876c177f6765c1f2859c00
49348 F20110109_AABVFY grieb_m_Page_169.pro
577d50b72dfdee37d69a746238f9449e
e633d0f227d422aa3e17e19849ece7528e74fa50
50937 F20110109_AABTRE grieb_m_Page_190.pro
5c3b008e3f989633851b1052ddacea6d
4436275183f247ccda193a188c04b5ebf0f4f8a3
53519 F20110109_AABVFZ grieb_m_Page_170.pro
bbcd46724be1abe6b8c54add75532448
b7b0543b4444edfb20d5db85afda41f84d75ad9a
5646 F20110109_AABTRF grieb_m_Page_127thm.jpg
6787633834fed913e5c142409cadfdf5
9634807f939e122e404534adc7ec38d90fd7be56
71088 F20110109_AABTRG grieb_m_Page_138.pro
c6a62382cf120a011751c8f1c992d5a9
4b2a32682e05a97d060ec0c8ad79f1252f263850
2137 F20110109_AABTRH grieb_m_Page_089.txt
aa8286226c32d319c16c7f053b74be57
0904dfab47bdc9a7a90af71caafc5ba8244e0176
105194 F20110109_AABUOA grieb_m_Page_100.jp2
3eeff5899c8a7dd8baa82599a99953c2
fce7359e72cf9fab2b961b1005ec6669a06f79ce
115519 F20110109_AABTRI grieb_m_Page_053.jp2
8fac1c792d89791015e034943403794e
8eabe6dbb5508d2548139a546e02a08f8ebb28aa
50738 F20110109_AABUOB grieb_m_Page_057.pro
cb83365da73f2f0c366be7b8d997a01e
ce093b65fd3b43c4338c7d346b1a5b4254fe3455
2338 F20110109_AABTRJ grieb_m_Page_165.txt
e5558d3b810a5ee85d6cc6f76dd072b4
f7d6cf8fbe936d6f09befb88ed4e49f9e098d6f7
55632 F20110109_AABUOC grieb_m_Page_091.pro
c6e17b09195f1f2da22e8c662a696b2e
09ab5482f9b4a1e1b0a7680d5071a1fe06483b33
52325 F20110109_AABTRK grieb_m_Page_015.pro
8e9e294f0a09ec2cbbb42f60430003ff
655db0d2d4a4ca0659374572ce4a55843baf861c
F20110109_AABUOD grieb_m_Page_064.tif
e72fbe370f9e7b56bbc335dadab0ab95
f302e251c281a8d03a55f74d4192a713c9ceb52d
6289 F20110109_AABTRL grieb_m_Page_167thm.jpg
2447ae779b1a8104730d6f00c8a382f7
f4b110bdc7b6bf8fd0b8d7643909241d10a030ab
26822 F20110109_AABUOE grieb_m_Page_075.QC.jpg
6abb1a49cd15c5aad1ad4d80268f4551
c0abbc63077883474e9de32ede2abc15c10fa43d
54807 F20110109_AABTRM grieb_m_Page_082.pro
6585a593560b3a48b14b9c228f4b76a2
0532c9a996a8a24325a1990253c7bd80ab1b8bc2
96716 F20110109_AABUOF grieb_m_Page_167.jpg
f0056557d3bb0b5f12d6817b897bb7a7
31e6f9eb0ba83abd9903c41146a49f07a8676a22
98888 F20110109_AABTRN grieb_m_Page_217.jpg
004690ac2b737915ec5c5bbd5ef468f9
48eb9e795ee0596e5315393f9917bc3e39b0b22e
6584 F20110109_AABUOG grieb_m_Page_098thm.jpg
02c1bbf9f65a8b08a43e9df3c586a038
f51757f6c91deea017d8d34d018a829bd3d3a2ec
18761 F20110109_AABVLA grieb_m_Page_006.QC.jpg
fbf0542bebfacaed6e7dfc19bac7454e
e97f05f83f75b722e42358eb7f2fae001ad904bc
51598 F20110109_AABUOH grieb_m_Page_185.pro
9890cd3b0e2fe994b40ad7856f3e50aa
12c44666e3d9ad729ca253afb518723091e0559a
3478 F20110109_AABVLB grieb_m_Page_007thm.jpg
f0c894af286235cba9038924b7110892
f8751e4b723569219ae82deb74fc4a2b1f4dae3b
28070 F20110109_AABTRO grieb_m_Page_025.QC.jpg
2a616a419899675c307e7baac9225d93
87c9970322eb211a65317a77504e51d02fcdcfdf
1930 F20110109_AABUOI grieb_m_Page_116.txt
9fe827088f34d42e47e73bd4e4747f77
b04fa29dd6f874261b659684cdf888eb99fbf370
5212 F20110109_AABVLC grieb_m_Page_008thm.jpg
e55a7903420b9c1b92b299d38f3ee1cd
982de5716d37d5a6246d3da0da15e03b94cd6535
122667 F20110109_AABTRP grieb_m_Page_106.jp2
e34f4f61f51911e70550b957c725218f
ba2e007da97d6448b40bb175d8e0f8b0af7cb15a
6504 F20110109_AABUOJ grieb_m_Page_141thm.jpg
fb4ea5d52ef63740d5ad071457a50cd5
6fb19d3f9d80bd0ad9ef3b17f158149fb79bd5b0
2118 F20110109_AABVLD grieb_m_Page_009thm.jpg
cee4dd9c17b2a87ab8a90637213150c6
4c7487ffa6677df01123ade346d6f6b014073747
63965 F20110109_AABTRQ grieb_m_Page_130.pro
c36abf8e9c28079804308974522d0138
b957bed2751a52d0374942a51464517056000599
21173 F20110109_AABVLE grieb_m_Page_010.QC.jpg
d79b0914703fe4092d91e9a9d790be5c
7aaac27b9756e46a038cccdac397f6959f1b21a7
6561 F20110109_AABTRR grieb_m_Page_059thm.jpg
ab84e4fbae98c38e6ccf36f7ea2b3f48
da9622993892851d9929cbbac320ab1a326a08dd
F20110109_AABUOK grieb_m_Page_169.tif
c52ef344796b0e74f516b8026bed12c9
291666aff02ce29cb69d73a3ac05233c30b57301
5200 F20110109_AABVLF grieb_m_Page_010thm.jpg
df181930e536e1f886d218afbf8d8bde
882fa6e72026e41b61867b585091b5605c197444
113298 F20110109_AABUBA grieb_m_Page_117.jp2
64d826df605aecb9658d581f46fb9924
12ad043bb639d4dbf00252a279122d1f4b25e3d7
118137 F20110109_AABTRS grieb_m_Page_098.jp2
a20c431655b2bbe13e715686b10b4c3a
eac9a2c4fe1a237248577a066ab888dfdcf16118
26895 F20110109_AABUOL grieb_m_Page_198.QC.jpg
047254295b44bb391fc9648d01403aa5
65beff25c19034505783a08e34fb542a92dc9ab0
6166 F20110109_AABUBB grieb_m_Page_015thm.jpg
ab922c80ae18c10ff9eb523d5e94ffdf
0009f511c8c8063402488331e4cf4c75c9010c4e
93636 F20110109_AABTRT grieb_m_Page_215.jpg
812b5cd282f6ff427575259e3a502a50
92c1720cbcea42f84a4468d29bac0415c6a3f2fa
21385 F20110109_AABUOM grieb_m_Page_008.QC.jpg
0425aa706d7f8f576459d4b3ca9d7e36
a2269f2f2d2c4bf09bff30f9a7d0d0b6c6bea16b
6093 F20110109_AABVLG grieb_m_Page_012thm.jpg
145828c80cf943edc8b1107e5dc447c3
6552e0e73a26b0afce56d93464624bf5dd7344aa
83667 F20110109_AABUBC grieb_m_Page_121.jpg
9b0ca4a635ca72d7f3de3aad3d747346
8f48a8ac63a8ad29e1577290b4c20acb7c809a1b
4251 F20110109_AABTRU grieb_m_Page_006thm.jpg
0fe3be623c7d9eb0770f3fec23ed2059
e0a9c6804a86ae5d3e5f789263dacc72475a5cec
1954 F20110109_AABUON grieb_m_Page_169.txt
f57320fbd289773f040f4d8988ea1d42
69c600c7372abf5746db65690cdc1c55210e72f2
25575 F20110109_AABVLH grieb_m_Page_013.QC.jpg
c8184e62153c69679cf3b59d351594f6
ff91adbeb392c5dd6aa6be52f41b48cd12729d81
49007 F20110109_AABUBD grieb_m_Page_173.pro
80aeb21965424629d5a7e5a1e3e7c416
26a10ed26d1e12f5faf09139ea803d580f31cccc
F20110109_AABTRV grieb_m_Page_091.tif
393a29220dc91b4b86b1c5c94e23712d
d206d5a092ddff896b883369e8e5f757f9cc8151
25766 F20110109_AABUOO grieb_m_Page_097.QC.jpg
a3c1d77d15a2785414290267c45d3080
0f3ae880568a7d6726a71ed2e1152984be4ef160
25396 F20110109_AABVLI grieb_m_Page_014.QC.jpg
22f17db1c38a4cb4dae9c50ead563a14
5fea652ed5da707bdd34089c1bd1122040604f15
26417 F20110109_AABUBE grieb_m_Page_045.QC.jpg
fabf0b59d8fa29c33dc7ced348586be6
5d3f190448cbcd3cd23bbb138d2bfbb16391586b
128632 F20110109_AABTRW grieb_m_Page_130.jp2
b318d17b8565da7769f48a752b5850c5
21c79721b2215e17fb7566976aea6c0faa478c3d
109579 F20110109_AABUOP grieb_m_Page_026.jp2
8f10b44c09c08fe2c60ab80ce51bf0a9
01b2564cf66a0b26c1a27b912719869e0eda2dde
5946 F20110109_AABVLJ grieb_m_Page_014thm.jpg
c4dae2ed758874d616163b587f2907da
0d42cb9d499fe8883c1d95f0a7c66e6a2876433f
F20110109_AABUBF grieb_m_Page_071.tif
619122dd7226e705b99b8faf4c2fa39f
b087129176079fc100b9e2b83ad23ae06fe54bec
66983 F20110109_AABTRX grieb_m_Page_051.pro
fa06c66be5bb46a1b317b71175b4cf2e
6687fcccc63cff6b9e0660adfbb367140201a083
F20110109_AABUOQ grieb_m_Page_224.tif
033ec0718ff250805c15ffd7f94d12b2
fea257e0ef77c30815158ee8e8354ec0f1f8e513
23983 F20110109_AABVLK grieb_m_Page_016.QC.jpg
9d3e0d62f679ccc69e9957ccb6f9e5e5
533393c17c3d9f7078fa4a8d0921e3262257faaa
83986 F20110109_AABUBG grieb_m_Page_043.jpg
e08fbdbcecc75b23d6459dfc3be4672c
b610e4b117a144c470c1e46bb0944ac915aa331a
89321 F20110109_AABTRY grieb_m_Page_078.jpg
0d6db3893eaf7a46abe1b39fe7aeff03
72c952c0dbe838a14c7b82065d2ebd30eebce690
F20110109_AABUOR grieb_m_Page_173.tif
9dc3c191d1a3ff5685f240fefe2e7ad5
20c905a89a604d7306d5048d3f5c816a186901dd
5991 F20110109_AABVLL grieb_m_Page_016thm.jpg
71957bcae33e74fb60750737bdc64faf
3267acab5e5c95ec3632880524ca011c45a2bf67
2100 F20110109_AABUBH grieb_m_Page_182.txt
4bbf5bffbc1e9eadf6eb4db9cc2e137c
371d331cbc64d6e0abccb530af9ff5d2537e07b2
F20110109_AABTRZ grieb_m_Page_206.tif
d9b815835af84ccaef8b5842e993dfef
060027c037786c5a3e9f6cc802dd36cf7e5f0e46
F20110109_AABUOS grieb_m_Page_139.tif
8599e5769bcbfc14d6c19a2f1d66f624
49762e853eecee741c74111d3c2e5a5065daf9dd
6682 F20110109_AABVLM grieb_m_Page_017thm.jpg
835c88e9c7ecabf9dbf052a677a6614a
96cb6fb083a7529bcec6c2274aaabc2bfa3be21e
51098 F20110109_AABUBI grieb_m_Page_123.pro
29d75f4cafd83f860f50de40c78a858b
e8c29071b2d9763a6b98b9c7b9bc967d03f6e032
106557 F20110109_AABUOT grieb_m_Page_030.jp2
e157ebf7e52e8cb81b25b8fab414f3af
90ef41b1c361046fae05dafd557bd3ba4d156519
25987 F20110109_AABVLN grieb_m_Page_019.QC.jpg
709b4ec1594efffc6103a4ecaf08649a
e2f4a89a5315c6d6c9c9b7148fca4f6dbc7648f4
F20110109_AABUBJ grieb_m_Page_067.tif
50d32b0f2ef0c07c399d11ffa71e7dad
eafe7921a0280e14d9484023d7f29276628cef40
29159 F20110109_AABUOU grieb_m_Page_201.QC.jpg
ed70f23be8b6a17d2825137d38627d9e
c4c690bfdd13616cd161164a672ccf8799c981af
6243 F20110109_AABVLO grieb_m_Page_019thm.jpg
10a389517af13e69dd9e83d914d056c3
aa25433446ab411c104864878b635f818a4cbefb
1919 F20110109_AABUBK grieb_m_Page_113.txt
b819a5699e134006b2c924b7aa6ed2ba
8c17d19f6bd77d1e2805d5fc1a46620ce7843eb6
2033 F20110109_AABUOV grieb_m_Page_121.txt
6844ed2a6bcca9c8b50e838815fee7e7
3543b4e676b68d45763d34393688ea2b0a7c50c6
5908 F20110109_AABVLP grieb_m_Page_021thm.jpg
c44083e0b1571b62779ac2296809538e
c0544e32cefd4ca77358ed5cfd0d5609b374c86d
95769 F20110109_AABUBL grieb_m_Page_051.jpg
fbfc858f1a78fcb03a09ddfa0ed101dd
3df1d9d303a22c5e3b2b041e385754c5f251b970
90636 F20110109_AABUOW grieb_m_Page_023.jpg
ff51f719f40eec66d34f08cf46f29a81
b111da9c807d8b0c7fab3266b785f7087335469f
5806 F20110109_AABVLQ grieb_m_Page_022thm.jpg
4b2dfbbc1ac916fc6538ac0def9c736f
b29ff64dbfbf6268fcc20b5ce38f0f852c6af2ea
142434 F20110109_AABUBM grieb_m_Page_044.jp2
39a6a71812c8aa72dcba1729715fa014
54503862f18599661b1f5de5282ecad51de36a17
2269 F20110109_AABUOX grieb_m_Page_077.txt
099b4d4f3e456875d1f0cad12479533a
44d6fd226b994e17a7e2e82b353234975261dcdd
27818 F20110109_AABVLR grieb_m_Page_023.QC.jpg
802eceabc652c8f1fe3a8a6e47baa160
9e090ac93b5763df51c22fc0ddd0be92043a7838
90996 F20110109_AABUBN grieb_m_Page_072.jpg
7768c2753ef6046218af2bae25a5db08
9ae8dcd55c6ffce3ec1f60f13648ae1579732fc6
52091 F20110109_AABUOY grieb_m_Page_205.pro
881e40bfa84beb7e9a0db1e09b0c1258
a0a34faaf05b9825783a3c0279e80f8424023818
6638 F20110109_AABVLS grieb_m_Page_023thm.jpg
1418b31f245f1a98eca9cf05dd3f5d18
a4cc0770f00c1c2203b7efdf1aaac915b3ed8d22
6673 F20110109_AABUBO grieb_m_Page_033thm.jpg
782fa10ea44d6cbf23bc3d1966be5f42
9350c02428b531a4231899bae159f4cdb8f17e3a
30305 F20110109_AABUOZ grieb_m_Page_162.pro
973354a83f4aa8f34dc41b3beb613d51
021cd690d6573a8b92895e7335695d8b0c7d31f2
6373 F20110109_AABVLT grieb_m_Page_024thm.jpg
8322e56464a4d8463f51494b8468bdf4
b858845db650427132ca0a5ac40d066e9fcc08aa
2072 F20110109_AABUBP grieb_m_Page_171.txt
b6027f11dcc2ead464663c88dc15a264
337333af8cd1a0093781d2d86b9e36684b019992
29047 F20110109_AABVLU grieb_m_Page_027.QC.jpg
8af3986dc3b1c2e7c1e8a45e622a2e31
8f26b54aa9e838b269f82036289b47e2be7c6c5c
F20110109_AABTXA grieb_m_Page_117.tif
a5aecbf0b76e492e4d87e290d906341d
d87117eb97633c21c8546defba40dfb8a4731044
122811 F20110109_AABUBQ grieb_m_Page_140.jp2
d249c2fd3dca753290bfcb7d4ec22e8e
6071d0645becbffe21cbe5a4d9a645a2c29c26fb
6816 F20110109_AABVLV grieb_m_Page_027thm.jpg
c5e5175f37caed504a06eb10f6a8f687
093771c73c6b869d9ae8859b426a05ef4b48059b
56489 F20110109_AABTXB grieb_m_Page_143.pro
94f0b0b1ae0e63a955dbf9a0d202ad9b
e5a319db23e03d1085034e75fcc7862a2aa0556f
F20110109_AABUBR grieb_m_Page_213.tif
b1e709efa146f77eb97e8b3b73dcec02
f0fde928635e9d5470a716b779dc01869136451d
6189 F20110109_AABVLW grieb_m_Page_028thm.jpg
847e60234b08640cab104681f494054c
0f15fbfe1eeeb2d9797b7625f333a7b71a781809
126380 F20110109_AABTXC grieb_m_Page_217.jp2
5d4c8bb263997fc3a6ae488e4a842c7b
07bf47a28bea88cbdd2865f39be32bc15cdee3fd
28072 F20110109_AABUBS grieb_m_Page_081.QC.jpg
27e5fabba693997e4383752d43420fc4
55793f573dc7ccdac775d7b20b65f3b6cc25e0cb
24783 F20110109_AABVLX grieb_m_Page_030.QC.jpg
d99f8f368ae36fb22e8ae1c50a314d3a
c8c60f35d15b99c7394914f13f25838a775a8975
53253 F20110109_AABTXD grieb_m_Page_011.pro
04a31a0da7f83e8bc918e1a6d6b34a2b
3c8162a115f8bbcdd4f8acc515339ff9113d572a
24198 F20110109_AABUBT grieb_m_Page_154.QC.jpg
8466895de0339dd12203e61ff23b3904
0ce49cb042b8aad2ebcb83e74ea54e0d6984110b
6003 F20110109_AABVLY grieb_m_Page_030thm.jpg
aa92972d6b9f4d70f9a67784d0ec43b5
a337d7b947cfc637608ae6cf2818a1644b201536
6204 F20110109_AABTXE grieb_m_Page_082thm.jpg
3e612c56473a9fb634f048f9827c71ab
904064282a999dc25df10797fac402fb9b4776bb
6066 F20110109_AABUBU grieb_m_Page_186thm.jpg
ce4304ac1fe2da4b47afe23600e10854
0e4adb28df93ed9f711d78026025648c5590253d
27860 F20110109_AABVLZ grieb_m_Page_031.QC.jpg
ba4b925cb3f51fb3f9fb20e08eb21df0
4bfa7d20a072cff4645b7c92d781e50a8a4eee2d
F20110109_AABTXF grieb_m_Page_026.tif
e945acfb6b5aa3c2cc0357e0eee07785
42be8c3fa677b9e5af68576bbd112e3c22bc4b2d
26345 F20110109_AABUBV grieb_m_Page_185.QC.jpg
d0a2e070922f8a95cdc054edcfaf138e
00cd572ec690cb7c7e3d4844669ba05d917a89b4
117213 F20110109_AABTXG grieb_m_Page_068.jpg
e5f6795e3608304ce5b91a35b4af85be
5c6be12d66ff33c2749c46cd9594db7f85831582
42984 F20110109_AABUBW grieb_m_Page_010.pro
4d5bd13e4bcc05cd162ff71dda3c4819
be46ef730364db290a0c13b41497d9ad351201a1
84602 F20110109_AABTXH grieb_m_Page_145.jpg
623fd5b0b973d9518e9eebaf07d99f20
2e4cc1ee8e4d34d67a58f3b067b335656ca57b30
55444 F20110109_AABUBX grieb_m_Page_199.pro
3ca9c72556232e99891ca718b23b5189
57c37cfe0432b4e67a087c1dc0428d1055ff806c
88881 F20110109_AABUUA grieb_m_Page_126.jpg
9d9fe2a9e0d0eec5f7a7f37cbf9f0f54
a4aa96d7570a35f9a9cfc5d34cb04c888e47bb7d
102090 F20110109_AABTXI grieb_m_Page_027.jpg
87e921125f9f034bff8df00363899c8e
0fd68aca5ff2f8ee29c165175f68f5a40e44fc4e
80432 F20110109_AABUBY grieb_m_Page_151.pro
9ad57f851012b354c824021ae9eb93db
22ef475708afd8a9d99e05008c91c304ff555198
77183 F20110109_AABUUB grieb_m_Page_127.jpg
da32ee50539710c3e98759b1ba9d3307
b7d3d8911b46409d09fb866c8adb76c5c0e53e25
6255 F20110109_AABTXJ grieb_m_Page_216thm.jpg
ca750aa07ae841aa475fdcdbec5bb1bd
22b3a0f2946619fb185309d1df61e4f1641c15c8
F20110109_AABUBZ grieb_m_Page_101.tif
a95838cc50416252adb7cc7f181fea94
a3de8e3ee8a5d2651968e0e2e4260f730da2e7c4
102005 F20110109_AABUUC grieb_m_Page_129.jpg
64cfcbba20c82c1e4df8a5b402f4a5fd
ca40d6696d8ea7e58983b91542d832310b18822c
F20110109_AABTXK grieb_m_Page_152.tif
9007046c70bde0de7d1afa2c4009ce93
2a9395dfb32489df4fb7d29a09941a04a8134e35
86087 F20110109_AABUUD grieb_m_Page_134.jpg
7853cde28e908a6548bb0ff80611521a
21969043c5d6385eed4a71b28938c31e400cdd79
108943 F20110109_AABTXL grieb_m_Page_074.jp2
272f820d3924c0ba6d584208b314e32e
c754153cc99c4437f51e2b6b41915b0fbf019db4
85290 F20110109_AABUUE grieb_m_Page_136.jpg
bc4624f95c78e00e41af13f5badad415
c0acf06c3e7e8f85590f81df232aa3385654d14c
6448 F20110109_AABTXM grieb_m_Page_029thm.jpg
493656c1df026fea05da1136b0958bab
74d5fb0dd44743932bd95f328aac579c4304bc93
84707 F20110109_AABUUF grieb_m_Page_137.jpg
f287638e23cab7715ff6c1061e5b5609
d301897c607c4b3556b97bc574ce31914481f530
90120 F20110109_AABTXN grieb_m_Page_165.jpg
5b8084c3eae283b6de9c1864d9ed0c6d
d6955ff378d5741dd95b3887977b1e665db8d114
98185 F20110109_AABUUG grieb_m_Page_138.jpg
82d0b761309b7327bf7dc2541dcfd1cb
a104bccc360b9c16ae7cecddf4c672ad1123c041
89192 F20110109_AABTXO grieb_m_Page_187.jpg
08b9ffc6a96dde804b468668491c6fd1
64ab2bc6cc6b1022186c99985f088a1c9cd44b45
84955 F20110109_AABUUH grieb_m_Page_142.jpg
fda6091de4bd80a0689c7ec483b948a6
607e5fc655eb59c060f2416a1eee9e03c8579da6
24284 F20110109_AABVRA grieb_m_Page_175.QC.jpg
5f51d5d37d567dfe8931b3ed0d0b3a79
28333d1cfe7c8fca31727de18a53c0cb695060e0
6435 F20110109_AABTKE grieb_m_Page_197thm.jpg
09d241bf6a6992f8469b8b53c72870e4
a7c51dcfa3606fab44e3c1946dd5e4b8cf070c38
53334 F20110109_AABTXP grieb_m_Page_059.pro
5c54ddc0325d1c1a00b0c81dd3003b2f
0936697738245ea17c2e868bf1136c0a09dfc84a
83644 F20110109_AABUUI grieb_m_Page_144.jpg
5954cbfda6cb31e6a45aafc73487ad0d
1b1beba269c9ca924042386c9a8fcdf1969bb726
27112 F20110109_AABVRB grieb_m_Page_176.QC.jpg
9acfc611052d7a07d7a638d840753296
8d93e22f141bec3837a3571640bea47e34573107
2046 F20110109_AABTKF grieb_m_Page_210.txt
252532d3f908c05297fdd01322d9df72
18b6843376a016c8c4d5f638fff9406170b38148
27219 F20110109_AABTXQ grieb_m_Page_114.QC.jpg
6b0fdb5cc79c8d23edb37f7bc733835c
6f4589fe35c58dcbaea8f7b5f7f122554b87d571
90901 F20110109_AABUUJ grieb_m_Page_147.jpg
e246068ef79f37e719607845b511fe3e
6016ce7864bf9c1179c8ae70537ff6afeb962973
25507 F20110109_AABVRC grieb_m_Page_177.QC.jpg
1a09a3714b7060c79e87db1787e54a6e
2385bf272bf4e2ec3fb81a19ba83369fd08e7aed
97774 F20110109_AABTXR grieb_m_Page_163.jp2
dc4f75fabb32b248b8ac1abde94f0272
a2ccc716b492107b3f19d62972e87550ea00879b
91981 F20110109_AABUUK grieb_m_Page_148.jpg
8605b573b77e8b6e78978339651b83a1
6a4345bd2c5cb56a6ac52ea45391520380024835
6495 F20110109_AABVRD grieb_m_Page_179thm.jpg
3e3752afa249e16732f32eb51f1bd981
5d12403216379f5e1ac424dc957f6d40db1d9323
F20110109_AABTKG grieb_m_Page_175.txt
db28a6fe4ea2a410159b4fb4eb27e349
7bbc767456c8f60a5c2aa111305187dd76f69012
97819 F20110109_AABUHA grieb_m_Page_070.jpg
73fb213124fe3e32621cc05508d4d8b3
24704aec0ba407677e88345cd422463401f111a1
F20110109_AABTXS grieb_m_Page_015.tif
beb22553f3fe78991920c45eca84b19b
ecad3b3c9f63913932ca4ed0ab1970439357628f
86201 F20110109_AABUUL grieb_m_Page_150.jpg
2a45699a333455143c08af093892bfe9
d00525c26e543b701aefaa878dc16f460ed643eb
27032 F20110109_AABVRE grieb_m_Page_181.QC.jpg
165666c1d0452b9bf48f51d0a3178f50
02dd3b607a13a430c525e9aac102a7a1a009b6d3
2032 F20110109_AABUHB grieb_m_Page_208.txt
4aacbace2daeeb1db3c1649f709a31c2
16f78c105f3633dc27ce893dae0b52f81c91bdd7
82120 F20110109_AABTXT grieb_m_Page_014.jpg
49b54635f8a86c597a41428461d8e5f9
f20800fce6ed0db758b1754fb0b983e33fd54891
102595 F20110109_AABUUM grieb_m_Page_153.jpg
625389444137d6b0f654932a72551563
51751c9209c99df430a291d76a9bb912c02e7e43
24812 F20110109_AABVRF grieb_m_Page_183.QC.jpg
7ee54777fa1bede66a6d56ac2fd0e424
384fbfbf8dce81b469bdb05ac94217b325f94a65
54817 F20110109_AABTKH grieb_m_Page_089.pro
f71981be186cbdb3f4d5acc24081b38f
78e229310589ebb26644d913abea2d00f6b6af08
F20110109_AABUHC grieb_m_Page_216.tif
633a2bdcdea3f164d97965339e7a4fd6
b6cf26072f956a98e7e4978897f7157fa137b009
82432 F20110109_AABUUN grieb_m_Page_154.jpg
1f830ee91e799145ab97763792a237f9
bc5f57b9f4c5ff01a73a3ff366fad009c7511cdf
26697 F20110109_AABVRG grieb_m_Page_184.QC.jpg
5229c967b525d0b58ae727b18934dcab
3ab5bfff1ccf538813e872cf05ad8e681cd77beb
1943 F20110109_AABTKI grieb_m_Page_173.txt
790081e108eba3f4ad1bc09dcf6fee6e
e3a5182a07c6939d02b15626ff8035caed3cb600
80805 F20110109_AABTXU grieb_m_Page_212.jpg
228972e8a565a90fd0703e45d412b1d1
5ffae4cd389db93ed09c0abdb7d8831cd73eb726
92885 F20110109_AABUUO grieb_m_Page_160.jpg
e4229e6d5bdb5730c3639674c34851ab
d6a98bc96af0950fc8ef1f65a28d6495a52b359b
F20110109_AABVRH grieb_m_Page_185thm.jpg
ad7d869dcd1ac43410d6c1c96493ded1
8ba86c9774fe174964d8413b67d4cee99671dbc1
73529 F20110109_AABTKJ grieb_m_Page_153.pro
ef6aa6b36f5ef3dcb2a1aeb931dde5b3
f9ba35f17702f6e68e768ea120e030b0020ee117
6171 F20110109_AABUHD grieb_m_Page_036thm.jpg
cda2c47e6d2059a3ea76b2b29e4e104d
a8f3e2441599a7760befb984db1388f2dbe17cea
F20110109_AABTXV grieb_m_Page_049.tif
e87265f9a306503e84b62562498c7152
f2355f8c43bac6886a643f4752944b8e5e974855
82780 F20110109_AABUUP grieb_m_Page_170.jpg
d5e54715471434bc7e452ac284b1aba6
274d5cf6f05ae9217a75ab358af1fbd59a55adce
6241 F20110109_AABVRI grieb_m_Page_187thm.jpg
105be4d0adeaff1e65fe6aa1c7ee270c
b24fd7047585da5bdb236af08c945d3efb70913c
5738 F20110109_AABTKK grieb_m_Page_161thm.jpg
2c28b0df758ffde9d60ccedbce8c8295
8ad6d3ce0479386a3b33fc61caba89abb5c50eff
82999 F20110109_AABUHE grieb_m_Page_085.jpg
6b5313999be3419e28eb56b4b3cda9f6
261f03952f33ec448a4fce8bf1c3d4f91fbf53e4
2371 F20110109_AABTXW grieb_m_Page_102.txt
902d424c8886da6b6c4d350775a8d8f1
ed854c31f0392a2958c3ee550639af47138f54b3
24785 F20110109_AABVRJ grieb_m_Page_188.QC.jpg
5b85ad661bb9fa3323cfa5f21a66f745
d502bba9f88dd492ede883179e3612986da8db9d
93124 F20110109_AABTKL grieb_m_Page_156.jpg
4abec3bb98a3361a80e497531b58f6fa
4b33fbdd2759d250be2e2143be77c2266640e518
1975 F20110109_AABUHF grieb_m_Page_177.txt
b7f7cefa56254f5cd507e3a35f936d6e
2b90dc7ea6992b1a771d72fd551852788bcc1c82
76338 F20110109_AABTXX grieb_m_Page_017.pro
49d5d33a67b72dc2367aa084650fc2de
d54a9c2139880a806600fc645ba21223a6adfbf9
84259 F20110109_AABUUQ grieb_m_Page_171.jpg
367bb86b0afc9b61021d73c4b4987f5d
322d827174bb40d10babe4a10a94082c012d630a
5933 F20110109_AABVRK grieb_m_Page_188thm.jpg
fceac84cd5c13c8a348f13addd6b87d9
78876ee05e1d386735c93f6b81fb3cbb984182d8
110110 F20110109_AABTKM grieb_m_Page_123.jp2
6ac064ebc337ce5328bf8f62039c19ec
141826bf73f7e49a15cb8b818ac46e5cef51145c
6596 F20110109_AABUHG grieb_m_Page_157thm.jpg
4dd2a6bac4b2ef72b7212ae3b5d9b2d8
4a856260e23d632a9bd73297435d2a9b65aa09f6
109818 F20110109_AABTXY grieb_m_Page_184.jp2
d5ad9edfb5bcb7147622cbe68c47243c
3b8d09fd867e10450f2b60bc636b5fe79a12f792
92903 F20110109_AABUUR grieb_m_Page_172.jpg
57a5b3bacdad934e67f761101620381c
693467e28bc1392dbc08b525132cf16cb2fa5155
27949 F20110109_AABVRL grieb_m_Page_189.QC.jpg
d06fb3fac0258e1de8e6580fbc5c404e
7bd7ef930a0c1c6d219cf462d2d3b0eb23c5bc75
27815 F20110109_AABTKN grieb_m_Page_222.QC.jpg
ff3c27f4cb032dbeda68123319f6922e
3b817cc0889b76b63ce2bff71da8d47e8370abfe
53667 F20110109_AABUHH grieb_m_Page_196.pro
2cea9968a3b211d3ac53be93629c33bb
5ba5abae18838bed71b57e9ad1bbb4cccb40ea55
6324 F20110109_AABTXZ grieb_m_Page_045thm.jpg
48c322ace07acbca8d7dff82cda48172
b185b255b861bad94e4bc915276a93734d6e4db1
62580 F20110109_AABVEA grieb_m_Page_055.pro
b99e5e87d5978aaedb5a42810bccc1e3
eaf628b0ec9a1e51d8ae7744e746ff866f6ae81e
80789 F20110109_AABUUS grieb_m_Page_173.jpg
ccc71f65f20af8e97220c386f3fcaebb
d15f1821bb5e3499b01f5bbcc4239837afab7f6f
121607 F20110109_AABTKO grieb_m_Page_063.jp2
1b9e4df079c707cb94ca893a46ac2589
6037c36a8fca63c8c86b71014f9d89128b38f6bf
2108 F20110109_AABUHI grieb_m_Page_107.txt
12f846c79e1dadbbb976aee8d5925aaf
4a2f58dc6bda19dcff2e7da24c4d3c26f57a4f21
64174 F20110109_AABVEB grieb_m_Page_056.pro
734c44eb396da4f7e66af0945ba42b2c
aebe45a5088d5a704bd35b0538e4d9090b1b91fd
79465 F20110109_AABUUT grieb_m_Page_175.jpg
0c4dedbbfd7470c277b1efdc4e9819af
135801b25cc4043ea86b37a3b88da1e1c7c73d80
6261 F20110109_AABVRM grieb_m_Page_189thm.jpg
35450ec5c493a2af96fa99c661697a57
accc1f0a57d1d058de573fab06b43c382effbecb
113168 F20110109_AABTKP grieb_m_Page_080.jp2
03b9a71621ed31acab055d02d1c4466e
821ce933d555269a3715e289a55a0fea7adffec5
6706 F20110109_AABUHJ grieb_m_Page_193thm.jpg
c8bce4d33dc51377558ba377a59bdcae
008b20f4b900ae89902505a9879a05518d6363ad
64175 F20110109_AABVEC grieb_m_Page_061.pro
bde928f16503cc32085cbf08174ba89b
f53b25dcfec2e9c31a14e05b945683574e9f1d39
82356 F20110109_AABUUU grieb_m_Page_177.jpg
e3b5952e39551f0371c93fe1b5a27259
3f6e7491a50881ecf84220b8b11ec90191b9a1af
6309 F20110109_AABVRN grieb_m_Page_191thm.jpg
b0ef643d39d0a9760854e49cd6aeb812
519aa7ae7f34973d9300ba5f6bb6a0fbd9707ea2
108136 F20110109_AABTKQ grieb_m_Page_014.jp2
f6bc0f9300ca3612f878812689d98982
430230d249773da889840d5265d38450fdbd0f8e
52195 F20110109_AABUHK grieb_m_Page_043.pro
957ed76ff028298c734e9faab7853df4
33fab23bb80932abac5a8f3b3b7f47f00dab91de
52312 F20110109_AABVED grieb_m_Page_062.pro
4d49839cc4fcd26ba3644913caee4164
0630c0f7fd62744d44c56e5c20613d1360d68f16
82611 F20110109_AABUUV grieb_m_Page_180.jpg
f2198e29a47a8aa400c615f529f35561
a59bef18026c565ddfdf9a2854578644a7361f16
27123 F20110109_AABVRO grieb_m_Page_192.QC.jpg
7a1e45bf57850d22675d59aaca738743
f0c686d93b2b942da91029b296e737b6965bf2c8
24767 F20110109_AABTKR grieb_m_Page_100.QC.jpg
956bb04f3f3a628017a95a262a0aef2b
a597220ffd7714ca6e9e6dac7fdeb8cf7a2fcc42
2713 F20110109_AABUHL grieb_m_Page_070.txt
427d3301d0c9f81df2d1aa27005fd269
9ad0dd8e307bb299587b490a41b6ad71f983fad3
21398 F20110109_AABVEE grieb_m_Page_064.pro
dbb07988e231d45b4d51970366271c16
5cc4d9b2fbc6d0f1474b593dde2fd336492888bd
89135 F20110109_AABUUW grieb_m_Page_181.jpg
0520020fa61046c7f9637d21d512cb17
a17d6c52011d131be886099b176e5e4157f3197f
6349 F20110109_AABVRP grieb_m_Page_192thm.jpg
c63099c9bceaf5c25a3776daa6848adb
c8d37d7b555fec51641176fec9544df62a348bae
6546 F20110109_AABTKS grieb_m_Page_223thm.jpg
b1bca214b33e40dbf6815737a0da17b7
e3531bfe42972214e4f816a3ca535599bc5c7025
95791 F20110109_AABUHM grieb_m_Page_133.jpg
34d54fe7610f174d9115a273455e041f
7d6ee82567019f22f3789fde28fe03df8128c87e
39516 F20110109_AABVEF grieb_m_Page_065.pro
9654c9d27c8ac07adf793fcc976c35b4
56772fefe64b47d70f83cf27e28963c134db9c2a
79869 F20110109_AABUUX grieb_m_Page_188.jpg
4adb30b8fb15fa2c7d77fccdae350ce2
a074fc91c75bd38a9102a8bad682b7ec8ea14ac8
29291 F20110109_AABVRQ grieb_m_Page_193.QC.jpg
10e059d3198ea7f281c6dac657edec46
5cbdebece2003ee5e05a3e6f9b956d44364bb333
6471 F20110109_AABTKT grieb_m_Page_109thm.jpg
d375cd63dedd2c0d0167d3165ea6db2c
5aeda38e02222b6ac482e342effd4ad25c59ba4b
6449 F20110109_AABUHN grieb_m_Page_190thm.jpg
0ab0ed322d311cae5c252dc42ad7c275
6f1be2a60c2ed681d75c87ae1c05a3326acaeec4
51637 F20110109_AABVEG grieb_m_Page_066.pro
49022952bc702ef74ccf69a96438093d
d9a6f08c534385bf247ba7abc3f33c22d429b80c
84218 F20110109_AABUUY grieb_m_Page_190.jpg
c5259b4980064e55c78db8527b03c09d
afca97d212029478b95a6132f8d20de82ad00ba9
6284 F20110109_AABVRR grieb_m_Page_194thm.jpg
9381ecd84d620f3cd3b445442128707a
ffd16a92d3d5c60afe12b01fa4c65224b2d2bab9
220 F20110109_AABTKU grieb_m_Page_213.txt
d3059f68ef82e9fe40bd6dbd6d1c1a60
d7294272308c3dba90c92ef5e789286319e43c98
462 F20110109_AABUHO grieb_m_Page_003.pro
727c2fea2ccbc264c68d30a1e7e517bc
adc0bd7982010ac15a70f846278e9ba3c8cd0a86
94204 F20110109_AABVEH grieb_m_Page_068.pro
9c5a0d06c483f6956a7e82bac2e2d3a0
2f7304397365bcb70c57cd2d5cdc5269a933a882
111403 F20110109_AABUUZ grieb_m_Page_193.jpg
c1a8089077bef32750aa99cb79d2f3b9
518cc61ee510bba9c39598e79f7d6566c17fe637
27363 F20110109_AABVRS grieb_m_Page_195.QC.jpg
4a0076d05973a949ce706026cce5974a
7998711f566dbf7f98cfeefd7f07e23fb273d9ff
26730 F20110109_AABTKV grieb_m_Page_058.QC.jpg
5372afb8a84bca8fc849f4029c8ce9dc
c801702fdd777314e8d1c73af2838620f0260831
F20110109_AABUHP grieb_m_Page_211.tif
28aedf7ae22a74595ed4c3fba6839161
4e943847a4c57eda4804a265753308b966591a40
64215 F20110109_AABVEI grieb_m_Page_071.pro
f9bd8ab0d5a4472714804acecf7d133c
f339214e5bf88329e340f8321c99e56899a3b7c3
F20110109_AABVRT grieb_m_Page_195thm.jpg
38735427305a01384884ea9edfaa5460
0f98b4f019526e5cee4b1d7eb9586d00b033a7cc
77864 F20110109_AABTKW grieb_m_Page_201.pro
1c324646f32d7c0c988e86c2e350d1a1
9d277ec50580f57ac6c3d0efd650a9e1586c1422
122214 F20110109_AABUHQ grieb_m_Page_202.jp2
89351a0c2996a4c9b0de2c91900ff9b5
874ff76905be6321b9b43b12c1fcf41773265f99
49701 F20110109_AABVEJ grieb_m_Page_073.pro
2760cbf4fb10917a1cc03c0dd87802b0
e221905fc53bc09ccd2cfb7a31af3e541361f823
6270 F20110109_AABVRU grieb_m_Page_196thm.jpg
a64aa509d3ac5497804ca6659f0e02f7
a5e0f0021baa737c0017984a3be3ff5e1b6b74c8
27572 F20110109_AABTKX grieb_m_Page_052.QC.jpg
4e8f72cf92dc9fd587317b9196ac2d24
3de978e2c0a690074daab6a720788830f6442935
25808 F20110109_AABUHR grieb_m_Page_026.QC.jpg
e573b9e1306f6061853c1e8b631422e6
65975696020ec79137ba22b46f3676c9d035fc07
49368 F20110109_AABVEK grieb_m_Page_074.pro
c47f54097c6b59f5e630ef993ab3ea49
242aa802c84039c61d274f94c406cf8e2b33a074
F20110109_AABVRV grieb_m_Page_198thm.jpg
18b9cb210862bd61fdf14b5d78d27663
4bdc2df3dbfbda1e369d3e0f6a0d32cdfbe5e0c8
2002 F20110109_AABTKY grieb_m_Page_192.txt
facc5c3b4039c20fbce6591e7b4b1884
1d11e2bfee3af8c1e61e616a7f2c90515895994b
99932 F20110109_AABUHS grieb_m_Page_093.jpg
b378136acf145e5ed3189c7c1c80c7dc
d2193d1ef6484bff15ba507079b3d40c5cd9856e
50001 F20110109_AABVEL grieb_m_Page_076.pro
e6fb0bd81c6c0a9c1c551204ff4a6169
e6e53442c71115a06b1cdd911c2480498caa934f
F20110109_AABVRW grieb_m_Page_199.QC.jpg
d4295a1a7f734a47320022500f688a86
c0420215b4b0b47490899790add5763bc487523a
F20110109_AABTKZ grieb_m_Page_005.tif
ecba1eb52b21149dc6b18eeedaa2ee09
b0a2ec5a165f76f10c471d6c429fd607c04c7979
102787 F20110109_AABUHT grieb_m_Page_016.jp2
af9688046e26fc4e3dfdbcd48bccbd47
c8c0cfce098bcb8c6e12e67dc9cea1343199badd
58498 F20110109_AABVEM grieb_m_Page_077.pro
1d962d75edc9e15eb4a4461592e981bd
f93778b0d19a499800d7d6f568aa81f79a9d505d
6113 F20110109_AABVRX grieb_m_Page_199thm.jpg
48e4bb48a6536f0d0eac3133c9b0a562
00fe4c7859a86e24587a9d55fdf166ca91c07455
26850 F20110109_AABUHU grieb_m_Page_126.QC.jpg
2bdde155046effe13320c461f76bf5ad
55f1bdefc10a8dd88d6115f478c01a0ed99814bf
53863 F20110109_AABVEN grieb_m_Page_078.pro
5607b5cc557c653b279c5d85c777895d
02353c75002714ccdf3af5a6d40a3dc2f6048fdb
29915 F20110109_AABVRY grieb_m_Page_200.QC.jpg
0a7e353b37e7e81c662b7275ef3c6233
8c1c55e7b3e26ca33ea7c733790f61f9bacd469b
F20110109_AABUHV grieb_m_Page_194.tif
75521937c80fb1803313040b319aff64
94c3a99eeac1ddb8c9d64a5550f93d2f669c2994
56805 F20110109_AABVEO grieb_m_Page_079.pro
4b51dbc896a57089e8609957e3d3d6f0
05e1c38f5047520be9bc0e4e35a127411c2be848
27523 F20110109_AABVRZ grieb_m_Page_202.QC.jpg
d2591f481ea206f3d126f6ea4b76ec69
520fdeb25544d067c9e083dbbd330c04be945193
25085 F20110109_AABUHW grieb_m_Page_087.QC.jpg
13119c36a59848955d76fcbeb51a8e16
993536a153080922fdd5ac6da0aa225976882921
57953 F20110109_AABVEP grieb_m_Page_083.pro
e3cb1cb411b7442286477295b94a7d62
67c5849efc5ce28ecfb67833bc737456be1a7c0e
50787 F20110109_AABUHX grieb_m_Page_184.pro
afe95e479525f3a296b9c38243cbb7d2
d2683b5b2b90917b5117300a161bc983c03f3e84
55967 F20110109_AABVEQ grieb_m_Page_084.pro
0859fb0654ce79cc0ca3dd6f0dd875a1
eacb417382dc50b0a04fba379357a6ec8a8f5853
F20110109_AABUHY grieb_m_Page_095.tif
114cb0e82d012052cd58a6f621547912
20503b795be902fca1071dd230bf0f4e197c378f
50355 F20110109_AABVER grieb_m_Page_085.pro
57a3d683c1d5fb2bc4f1c6097dd02dac
910438c5bb6e305aaa03423f439bb7a02e121fcf
103573 F20110109_AABUHZ grieb_m_Page_201.jpg
4b9a11e79f5153e613f25305f847fd2b
1a9694efbedf703ad06e5abf392b1f19c4bfdc1e
61898 F20110109_AABVES grieb_m_Page_088.pro
a1ccd4ada553b244bd7b89ba8d659abb
1662c2d77b5de29ad284baead874ec8746014fc5
55321 F20110109_AABVET grieb_m_Page_095.pro
2c73559a00db499ca7dcac81c9043037
b34d4b454ddf32dec66e57cfd43f436c7576f2dd
51607 F20110109_AABVEU grieb_m_Page_096.pro
b9d4639b749e3e96e8f0afd9fee59bfc
51707fd3b4152abbdda0d0ed0d2811d7d9782b41
32879 F20110109_AABTQA grieb_m_Page_009.jp2
4ca2d65836879b99315b1c661274b85e
ce5b28174ac0a4965a7eebe288a18b110e1489aa
56553 F20110109_AABVEV grieb_m_Page_098.pro
61e2b4fa50952029eaec4d8ac91d17ed
6f559d946c174c789f66c382622f5463d1ea7d12
98658 F20110109_AABTQB grieb_m_Page_164.jpg
41638b4258d573563b9891df9bddd0ff
c7e70d2e02e73372a8e4cb2da843fc2224db7b78
48284 F20110109_AABVEW grieb_m_Page_100.pro
c41a23f06ad17a807de382335ac4e7b0
006270bdaf8892b93a96469a1dab951121d31a52
F20110109_AABTQC grieb_m_Page_043.tif
fac451bab90ae0f06cb96a805913f650
09332416ba0e2dc7a45a12f710e8a88c6e2cca75
60278 F20110109_AABVEX grieb_m_Page_101.pro
71014dcc2653df09e26a2a9f7992fea3
d8fbb05a65c1cf1d5874734b4cdb89549423618f
F20110109_AABTQD grieb_m_Page_147.tif
373c9c18bffc8b4e008b7d79f1894eef
526444d87d0c1bf51daed2ddc172f04a1cae7db9
48831 F20110109_AABVEY grieb_m_Page_105.pro
0040f543fcfa44a8f074f5af46973ccb
4ca51f3690d5e17a4bdcfb788e91e3848c79ce34
65288 F20110109_AABTQE grieb_m_Page_093.pro
175aca87c8a51651d8a29e6c402305f9
e663c3f8decc49f8967e8f96df75037ee4094aaa
53602 F20110109_AABVEZ grieb_m_Page_107.pro
d6bed9462d7ba3d4a957bc017216b9ad
dcb2de28a91486f006cb1c2f01b9116d7588116e
F20110109_AABTQF grieb_m_Page_140thm.jpg
71825bcbab17dc2047029edb7c8f453c
7a1519996dda2d33654b0c2026ed124e7f003916
58307 F20110109_AABTQG grieb_m_Page_047.pro
1b4c5b38bee5d71c78d17ab95f35adbf
292ae375d3ca187d3a35514381a9bf47186b6271
108474 F20110109_AABUNA grieb_m_Page_018.jp2
323539b2f73f1f5aaded69ecc9da09d0
148bc0ce54c0269975df575c4f2f3f13432978fd
F20110109_AABTQH grieb_m_Page_089thm.jpg
d9a9faf291717d774c4c1b99c4fd4bcf
4b5d97a1b940a88b0f3fbd6ce1f6a3c4bccae0b9
86346 F20110109_AABUNB grieb_m_Page_059.jpg
6e03b3ca027e436f04e68344a84948c9
77cc9f514380320616e108de95d9c185de527dbd
6573 F20110109_AABTQI grieb_m_Page_136thm.jpg
6269d867fdd4f7500ed435495fd7e300
ddf933e836bdbba411e20736007c2769ca91954e
80944 F20110109_AABUNC grieb_m_Page_209.jpg
56effec9a0ff11beb7a8ae81221c1d58
50c12f8cfa885ff026c8ff4a5b8e6c61bd187dcf
51998 F20110109_AABTQJ grieb_m_Page_175.pro
fb16b6f1bccbd7ae0dac5c823fe05f4f
d2a5282e38917da61aae18a41878297ee77062c0
1878 F20110109_AABUND grieb_m_Page_010.txt
2a478f1ae88727171b0a50d60228653e
959eb4f81cc6e6b0e93440b540551de3dcd52c0b
26250 F20110109_AABTQK grieb_m_Page_146.QC.jpg
cd5c523eaf630981b416ee23a86e56cc
60e474501fa5241c79930c0f08ec2fda0227f369
2005 F20110109_AABUNE grieb_m_Page_184.txt
5e117ffe98b21c7abba3877cefdb37ba
5fbf657b3e3f129bae17a4fee58c686c80d7130c
119548 F20110109_AABTQL grieb_m_Page_077.jp2
d0db7388d9e0abb8c4dc01fba7319df6
190d5a7ee046b287a749007a7208c5e6db53e4ed
27965 F20110109_AABUNF grieb_m_Page_033.QC.jpg
9231608541c6bb1b5c579ce5057f209e
46d435b07df550e782b446f29f8647dc803661cc
85187 F20110109_AABTQM grieb_m_Page_096.jpg
d6e4ab89cec0b9ca49eadcc087efe926
eec2df7e216b8e5304176407416c2e7a0b77922c
F20110109_AABUNG grieb_m_Page_140.tif
7ea4edc4a65516673bc59758e32c5a46
3eb0239f111274382f6b9e3c62c6199d4d23a66f
105662 F20110109_AABUNH grieb_m_Page_044.jpg
916b332b2b9c042f376fd83e3aecd4d4
4d148ba75103ab916fd31b4999547a578e596ce7
2075 F20110109_AABVKA grieb_m_Page_189.txt
30ed2eeb25efd6277a219c1594febf6d
fd0e9d11ab643ae091f55767d9507e719389aecd
113205 F20110109_AABTQN grieb_m_Page_097.jp2
35f82f7d50ec78e0f0037fbf5163ea55
7f53221d61fbb0c8ee5be73890a4f551f0db2c46
2007 F20110109_AABVKB grieb_m_Page_190.txt
c55ec6b7dc851bfffe8cbfef3ad5dcdb
d5b2c6525f47e1fef6ebe918ec6040b1a8e0cd3e
108 F20110109_AABTQO grieb_m_Page_002.txt
e2868ed0037e6a67880e0a2118f09466
b490d085bacf1f21eb53de8d977a1a244a43f2b8
25690 F20110109_AABUNI grieb_m_Page_074.QC.jpg
6b6094a770b1373fad538038622a8b45
c24fdd84499d277d2508a3c76d28b2a6497150ba
F20110109_AABVKC grieb_m_Page_191.txt
49276f4dc973ab3527b6520d7c0ece89
42d338f90a3c65b16f0a5e08dfc408c808eaff4d
1950 F20110109_AABTQP grieb_m_Page_183.txt
7c8cda472d0d52bc797788843ce5f5d0
cdda95425f409ffb9758c460dad498d473cd9b1a
3231 F20110109_AABVKD grieb_m_Page_193.txt
81ef3cfcb681b7e583b3fc32fb90eed8
f1692c8a36e43faf2f7e8b924e0784b73d247594
6548 F20110109_AABTQQ grieb_m_Page_056thm.jpg
f4772e4a553cd52d15c8f7e424149271
4a5cd3e55877a40e85d9614df742c01caa04ec70
103468 F20110109_AABUNJ grieb_m_Page_188.jp2
5d276ec7b17afe9811904e508a14a4c8
4f3673ba0e0d007f5e4e2804df7e54ff1a79f783
2463 F20110109_AABVKE grieb_m_Page_194.txt
5c329e7e5b7fbadc177b73f4c03b2c46
ab29796e64f7e408230bc2f6bcd73fee749993c0
81128 F20110109_AABTQR grieb_m_Page_141.pro
825ff0e79f04e7efbc93293f34a763da
bcc22dab1f51e01c73abee7eed222fd4063f3201
F20110109_AABUNK grieb_m_Page_076.tif
81a71fafe64b83dd4f97a286808923cf
5c747d84fb111f4207924b7d893272f1265c74f7
6538 F20110109_AABUAA grieb_m_Page_217thm.jpg
747d2cb7630480f56b93fe7c306009e3
fff2eaa7a7875492f45616f0e914eabe677385df
78579 F20110109_AABTQS grieb_m_Page_183.jpg
4d1b9105cdc0737bed175bb98fc20d63
795bc5f0963ca12b9fe62ac977ce0a2f482bdcb5
57516 F20110109_AABUNL grieb_m_Page_145.pro
ac0571c7cfc25a8beaa42b16509e6271
f26b207cc6f194c8d9d49b1a7a502569f4de6aaa
2029 F20110109_AABVKF grieb_m_Page_197.txt
0856817758962af42f8d287fdd1bda3d
8ea0224470d9d178dd968cbe4b826e67c2cecc83
94538 F20110109_AABUAB grieb_m_Page_069.jpg
5e197c6911fe7b83930efaecdb0a8567
04fe342c39b5baa72b670c039527638ee3a2eb54
6274 F20110109_AABTQT grieb_m_Page_042thm.jpg
9ef0f9c847c605e88d255344fa2ebeca
83fe6d97632c8d33596a037e981f7f7982150e6b
2135 F20110109_AABUNM grieb_m_Page_036.txt
fb14055a5909a63b200da902689e88ed
45b4d83ddb907b5f1064360df3931c895aa9a71c
2091 F20110109_AABVKG grieb_m_Page_198.txt
b3ef371d238e20825c73cbcbeaded77d
cb6f20f45f60e17b18cfc80ed7b3cbbdb178cd69
116162 F20110109_AABUAC grieb_m_Page_181.jp2
3e8f8e74990c2ae3eedcedb57e810c4e
6c1433d2ce8abb6dadcfaea5bb30b3e108f6f08e
26539 F20110109_AABTQU grieb_m_Page_080.QC.jpg
143dd5238858c58eb93578c45e90b228
bfd43a33390b1a9b27f96964980f4b3fa2713312
6383 F20110109_AABUNN grieb_m_Page_086thm.jpg
7d2f0c625034f88c8944a0ba39889461
bafef71e45397da2eec0f06a1e8ca0466bb47c9b
2220 F20110109_AABVKH grieb_m_Page_199.txt
9c005a9b7ed26a38d40d1896c5ad867a
ff32b054b1b8d870a6012ed13003b25f168c6526
2132 F20110109_AABUAD grieb_m_Page_146.txt
5e3d8d1ccaad2963d7600d35cc79c36c
54492a7705ce47fed302a8d6997f6f92838a1453
26088 F20110109_AABTQV grieb_m_Page_123.QC.jpg
40d2447070f6216c9f298d3bd983fc4e
5c036d27608c538cd7acd1adb96cffc4ee309a8c
26550 F20110109_AABUNO grieb_m_Page_028.QC.jpg
779371780118f1cfc4e07a0526fbabbf
55db16496df35ddc4376dac3f72e85baf7fd3495
3184 F20110109_AABVKI grieb_m_Page_200.txt
3239e29c04d8b0680b39bc36b93593da
b8fde3d39a8fbb78ecc05ac714ca2caf60c0bd39
27257 F20110109_AABUAE grieb_m_Page_029.QC.jpg
6594281b6431c6e6d3949b6d29cb5024
e8f15a00146123df09f4c9cbb54c3486839c0ae9
118886 F20110109_AABTQW grieb_m_Page_165.jp2
c56994f499c9ebe9b0074003b41a369a
d0a2d0e8c5a9fc581789c99e3625ec8eae22548f
122674 F20110109_AABUNP grieb_m_Page_172.jp2
cd498d00a4049f80b66c62c8fb43548f
ac442ff7dff635650edfe0cbb19bd81537bfaf20
2395 F20110109_AABVKJ grieb_m_Page_202.txt
c501cdc99bc3248fea4bfb099d6cbd44
580966d5a84b168ce5a0e824c3a23f77b24f20d1
110770 F20110109_AABUAF grieb_m_Page_028.jp2
b15ea9dad7e33aed1e9cc17137d47ac0
d819c4c54593dd86f03942580447522dce0e9ea7
2303 F20110109_AABTQX grieb_m_Page_025.txt
bfce62f777530d3fd67bd6e267e04a78
f49b15614ef61c33c5321182d1b7695a25f923a2
84850 F20110109_AABUNQ grieb_m_Page_028.jpg
2cb7ae37d973bfa33f5156efe279fc8e
22ec64b5ebc75786912712b1bb0692124acb3152
2051 F20110109_AABVKK grieb_m_Page_205.txt
84ec113d09648319a30e148e6897a6df
454005085982395e62084c0c4ad254de24d7886e
123597 F20110109_AABUAG grieb_m_Page_102.jp2
a8ed5d854fec5d9fa5ec5840af2c8a45
1ac625061e4bd83729996eb86c83166084144d81
6132 F20110109_AABTQY grieb_m_Page_184thm.jpg
a056980a2e7efc93ebfc5601da0ccff0
a974b057e4f19a64d59c552b1450b5eb159a38ea
84635 F20110109_AABUNR grieb_m_Page_186.jpg
2a1b3cd329bb27b847a29f5e021c7f18
4966a4cc7ee763e50b17a9fbbdcbd4b41af80262
2297 F20110109_AABVKL grieb_m_Page_206.txt
9ff7da042baded822905195e82b7df44
f16868350ba3bc51df3c76a620015f883f6beddc
5891 F20110109_AABUAH grieb_m_Page_154thm.jpg
abacc1976c2951f98a003a1fbf7cee58
693ff5c6925eec34a82641eaea53054be0a9b97a
27560 F20110109_AABTQZ grieb_m_Page_182.QC.jpg
aa52c72b3c9688b061434596413dadb8
bc40bcc3335c25dfda09839087c30b609cf42c01
6742 F20110109_AABUNS grieb_m_Page_044thm.jpg
0ef4273040108a5181aaf382301639f1
e699b8d2440b77bdf1035da28dfc775ec2ed4207
F20110109_AABVKM grieb_m_Page_211.txt
88fe926d8eabc0b6c09a58256dd9fe9c
9dd7e93635f62e0cf624609e991a8a8f9eac16f7
86357 F20110109_AABUAI grieb_m_Page_146.jpg
2433fc805c21ac8e92bbcb564b9c6cab
aaa984f6874963119827d6787e57bc114306a073
F20110109_AABUNT grieb_m_Page_082.tif
fce9d746f26bd88dadee91bba96e9094
678c004af035d16af19f1ef7f22d59d031aefbb9
1924 F20110109_AABVKN grieb_m_Page_212.txt
3d8c6e25a6efa0eea3306790f58782a3
082ea36639e486c3ac980748fd0a3507c9c3bf28
F20110109_AABUAJ grieb_m_Page_008.tif
461306cbb02848e0ade86646628ca284
190f061ced658e122bdeadecf21da7ff04e4ae1c
2061 F20110109_AABUNU grieb_m_Page_120.txt
c098d0fb3acebadfd0f38a1681115ad8
5621dd3d55d35788bcd3228894890c475fdb136a
1976 F20110109_AABVKO grieb_m_Page_214.txt
7e0d33baf320c6946e1de9a5f7de158b
1f56f4de981fba576c4b2caa7f142928fa76023d
27563 F20110109_AABUAK grieb_m_Page_091.QC.jpg
53d6b87d79b3dc92a277bfe5f7551732
499202bb64c1d9ff9b4d3bf19bedc7d723db18a0
121238 F20110109_AABUNV grieb_m_Page_049.jp2
7b35615b3cc057e5d1e596cec09e3a19
bf9f3073160dc3dd00f779c70ae5645862dcef50
F20110109_AABVKP grieb_m_Page_217.txt
0f7b87e425060f5c743d69435b52243e
5c5befb3152c5cf196fbd6b60a8416bbfc922767
F20110109_AABUAL grieb_m_Page_030.tif
161721bc78131d6baacc3a6600291122
8a1db127470a43893aa752d4c31f380412d864c2
99887 F20110109_AABUNW grieb_m_Page_221.jpg
51f426be641e0a9fee112eeb6ce0f06a
d62f4d4504eb792c4bfb01cdde8be6a2681e5b5d
2241 F20110109_AABVKQ grieb_m_Page_219.txt
894035e224de608cb133713293430cb7
0c9af6a96c6ca98406fc779c615dea651807e56b
1328 F20110109_AABUAM grieb_m_Page_002.QC.jpg
b65a276bab1fe17681a1a2842c30c76e
412f1c599bde1790699267efab28daf55b79559d
88030 F20110109_AABUNX grieb_m_Page_053.jpg
4ff8d293a5eb207c17e7f85c46565a54
0d78b4a35558dbe30fe3257c8a3b63760a019055
2234 F20110109_AABVKR grieb_m_Page_220.txt
ac8462412fe9d28ce0ad930231becb27
e30b4ccb694caf5b77529db5d97d6b9ac36b12af
2011 F20110109_AABUAN grieb_m_Page_032.txt
ee6bcdaea214366487a8d01195958ed7
bb916a26d155645832aca6ad98f15c29afc2a4c2
1973 F20110109_AABUNY grieb_m_Page_018.txt
1bebed79db31d8264e8c1dcf62bfa1c3
1b5923c67e1bd464f17e7a4eb3a0b9f5f70c3aef
2420 F20110109_AABVKS grieb_m_Page_222.txt
18cd494da34b4f5a06c78fe6d6131e1c
bc218d6bb8120d8a1be077044286787298cc20cf
97103 F20110109_AABUAO grieb_m_Page_219.jpg
51c74a009a380a0082cf272633cf02ef
9fa477db83f0c3a0b92a9a00eab10b42c884a2ac
132787 F20110109_AABUNZ grieb_m_Page_164.jp2
60d47dbbf5d5c1381025bef59bd17f1b
099c05541357060fdb7cc956792c640c0efe1190
2309 F20110109_AABVKT grieb_m_Page_223.txt
a99324a5e7fd8dcad53d85b554380943
d7d383b07d47d689248efb6a06233ff2241095bc
54901 F20110109_AABUAP grieb_m_Page_086.pro
2a38a89689020e84731c9389332234c6
73c3dfd2cbb22ec80ccdbdba4fc370c7ef72471a
1535 F20110109_AABVKU grieb_m_Page_224.txt
60879225ff6c0c5009ae145dc226f519
e58998039d07d83ff364648124d2fd291554522b
26733 F20110109_AABTWA grieb_m_Page_124.QC.jpg
797b766b98db4b62f00d0dbdf97631ff
372a57fe966363e0e8de5829f13a490f03a4ce51
49867 F20110109_AABUAQ grieb_m_Page_209.pro
80a5114ad5f38a2b1253dd9058046f0f
1d3fb6898cfd2afc536910313abb4c650515b42b
1070 F20110109_AABVKV grieb_m_Page_225.txt
0debd90da46dd52eb0769f3b2c30e56d
7e5236999927c8dca9aa40f931b0b9e9752fc6a7
6073 F20110109_AABTWB grieb_m_Page_013thm.jpg
fd9b55afb5ece7fdcfe9117193197053
effdf0ef77472c2e4e248138be09af3472399755
124186 F20110109_AABUAR grieb_m_Page_029.jp2
2ba2087068d7cfa5ad409fa7a40e458f
7f7d3145c6d3403c48c077343da1d0f212881d65
6367 F20110109_AABVKW grieb_m_Page_001.QC.jpg
07a94035b52ba7abf77855fb3602b027
05b08b016234dbbc9ca12f6c39c0e8391e653c36
2286 F20110109_AABTWC grieb_m_Page_050.txt
067bf1b9401945776f69f1b770d2ce88
69b38c04af5129fe3047e2930934cac4cd2247e6
59676 F20110109_AABUAS grieb_m_Page_041.pro
a16ba3db1d7d5eafdbfc8e92e043cb3d
cd549f30ab50203892c6179df4ea587d1810f447
500 F20110109_AABVKX grieb_m_Page_002thm.jpg
d7f91a29fea03c428683d55e462e74c2
acb5fdb3554d0ff2c8b090e06cbb6cc9f294f7bf
71257 F20110109_AABTWD grieb_m_Page_008.jpg
ee9f842d03850342e5b6680cebac6b8f
b34b1d807b4f52ff3a66e779d3555fde98b1f924
2337 F20110109_AABUAT grieb_m_Page_158.txt
c280e2d9c94fcfa472e922ab7895777e
fb7ae1031af043688ef0303c9194381330318d50
2347 F20110109_AABVKY grieb_m_Page_005.QC.jpg
7f3ddb74e3bff5f75db8d026fa121f91
8c5255edd87db2e6e8801afa23f378a4fe556cf8
2464 F20110109_AABTWE grieb_m_Page_157.txt
f5c563fe5b1d3bc3d280761688515d28
25a449090487e274ab0c944f0635b879088e57db
82503 F20110109_AABUAU grieb_m_Page_200.pro
f1924c94a5d32fdbafc01d6aeabb2ffd
50870907245e8bdb2ffcdd86fc088a12d8d926be
724 F20110109_AABVKZ grieb_m_Page_005thm.jpg
8f530b449131131f7d5e3cef7dde441b
4ac56635bc7a7ebbf4172e41c2496a9f46ca1d4f
26186 F20110109_AABTWF grieb_m_Page_034.QC.jpg
9b1c3a0b55f3827441d25ffdd2cc240f
9832936ed2452607ef3651f63991116a5a561cd8
72229 F20110109_AABUAV grieb_m_Page_010.jpg
5ca5b7a66f69a8da75acc299925454c8
0e60c7fc32e899bc264ebf0640356acd3114e7e3
F20110109_AABTWG grieb_m_Page_210.tif
1d04a5bc7183593612804e97ea07dd7e
91c632a7e72917921fd91b851f64c0ff245437a9
81924 F20110109_AABUAW grieb_m_Page_013.jpg
8c68437202c17dbcd10ebc3773a2c009
f6c3d224ca6bd453ce035df204d8444a3451c6de
2088 F20110109_AABTWH grieb_m_Page_011.txt
e46ca8a2be56d5e8d2369cec33e30d6d
ff0aba7598a6d8d76be274d3b280fe4ec2bdab5b
62129 F20110109_AABUAX grieb_m_Page_156.pro
a82362f17b5ae7904d4e86dc4a40c85b
ab3c756c20b32dac0b03bb37b22e8b757027503c
88790 F20110109_AABUTA grieb_m_Page_082.jpg
bf0a5ca3eef15cfd2a08fa24454cf541
87d65651138bb5f8df6f2ebf4d4af5da057c2d06
6201 F20110109_AABTWI grieb_m_Page_144thm.jpg
912f2d1a79638760fb61f898a056a01d
c8d7762d233ef2b8a80846e0c34d11ef4d93c867
2917 F20110109_AABUAY grieb_m_Page_092.txt
f55b1d73511d1ffc37f46315a3cef536
25eca50319b13c5fc503fd9b4b7f6cf5c2a2eac1
88697 F20110109_AABUTB grieb_m_Page_084.jpg
5f80f67b9ab01d0561833f77df4be498
971845c16d11445f63e319128e062014d6095cb4
135671 F20110109_AABTWJ grieb_m_Page_153.jp2
f734cabf5be15cef81b822f9fca802a2
56e8b93b38dedd050bfd19d04af67f9f81cc6fc4
84831 F20110109_AABUAZ grieb_m_Page_184.jpg
3a85905d4e44dd2e363efaa4ed1ad6de
c2215e0b36c10f16bcc32473f89f30028bc22726
86656 F20110109_AABUTC grieb_m_Page_086.jpg
2f35e248556bc509284ca922b73f0683
4798a2d72166631d149a83c12090dae235394211
F20110109_AABTWK grieb_m_Page_160.tif
71187dd7ae0398884073a48746e239cc
72285dca96ee49e184687890296cadb751cd9de3
F20110109_AABUTD grieb_m_Page_087.jpg
d55ce8e9c2b2698d673353d585969828
dcfc51a59acc30a1a40b8a075f87e874455f9734
14590 F20110109_AABTWL grieb_m_Page_225.QC.jpg
aeb7b870cf51ca1099716dc8d73ce607
bf2f73dd214132ef136cc8be71b907715cb17ca8
93419 F20110109_AABUTE grieb_m_Page_088.jpg
f679ce299616f411ecbb88a61204a681
e45e5380ac0f1d4854d677897363f5b3ffbd216f
82815 F20110109_AABTWM grieb_m_Page_073.jpg
23c2e1e494accfe058468f02050de55e
f5972e87f7cc1c6bb48ae9900e382ee978b82607
89653 F20110109_AABUTF grieb_m_Page_089.jpg
05f7ffbb7eec89e2104ddfa1a8c37c3d
55c2d234da78c2766845f8e589b8373108c842d8
1963 F20110109_AABTWN grieb_m_Page_118.txt
db9d5a9ee51f1a984ce8484cace72e99
8addcebf65127b8c9867a7e494ff6edf73bc3438
86261 F20110109_AABUTG grieb_m_Page_090.jpg
7448ced4cd6254f17eede9cc36ecd155
13cdfe9abd79860299624004c121015749f96ea4
6207 F20110109_AABVQA grieb_m_Page_146thm.jpg
042faaa9a698925542f4e085dbf959a2
9374156460871a066dab32c87068296e17a6ff8f
F20110109_AABTWO grieb_m_Page_087.txt
3d405c30bcaaf1381e35332589473bfb
58322a7e13bf2ca8eca8b636ce51d9f9ea8ae363
89468 F20110109_AABUTH grieb_m_Page_091.jpg
ff7ecf685080182a51111ded2e31908b
34d17340910c4d5fe87e11c3041d2f6775cda804
26335 F20110109_AABVQB grieb_m_Page_148.QC.jpg
5f663dc75d1c09270211ed5e9d36d6b8
a69763b692787bac2cefecc0a472cf67b3bed13f
6387 F20110109_AABTWP grieb_m_Page_096thm.jpg
9aa41a7285466433fafc2b7129da1b68
29f104fa37cf526c97d171b99ef1a16e7a68d9e7
104911 F20110109_AABUTI grieb_m_Page_092.jpg
092affad04d80cd34879fd7d7aec6bb3
380bbef5e6d0a6eb59d86216f7b0d53f1dde0883
25750 F20110109_AABVQC grieb_m_Page_150.QC.jpg
e78d5cf28dc9f6b65e208a3da1cb6003
2d9c36b8a9b0e50ca298b301fafd089e2928aac8
2197 F20110109_AABTWQ grieb_m_Page_137.txt
b4cad87913591d82119bc96cff8f07fd
5df194f646bb0da9b46c117978db27b942947b9f
88429 F20110109_AABUTJ grieb_m_Page_095.jpg
e372311613bb10f532508940a06595b0
b51a705ad787850aa50d777e811f199bfcfeea33
28355 F20110109_AABVQD grieb_m_Page_151.QC.jpg
e88d568a6505ff2caf1ad9fd4ac7760f
0db681c7c1c556204f9bf1cb944632951b1aece7
1985 F20110109_AABTWR grieb_m_Page_014.txt
45e664ae063f743b32d4ad6ad3aed5ca
52c560dc9795dffa54f25428405024f389f8df2f
103275 F20110109_AABUTK grieb_m_Page_099.jpg
e9eedc5dd2fed82ddf942ea01e663f1f
a94257984534fe72ccb1d3b316f04f9bc1d5c250
6683 F20110109_AABVQE grieb_m_Page_153thm.jpg
fc8972cb52fcd8c6cb8971accfbb1e1d
6d11bae09e70981b5c409d70e7c47a9c81da106f
30329 F20110109_AABUGA grieb_m_Page_068.QC.jpg
1e54eb7a6420e95dc9a7ade2b658a233
e47268065bf20835b9a69b516fb4912c86e10180
2306 F20110109_AABTWS grieb_m_Page_046.txt
d730ed33ed52c2b3829ef9be03793d75
3c0e35e2f4944e3c5d79fae300531b2baf15208f
91961 F20110109_AABUTL grieb_m_Page_101.jpg
daad444e209643ccb1bcb377c0451d95
3f37aa57c23a76242ecba3df064db9b210f2d021
6697 F20110109_AABVQF grieb_m_Page_155thm.jpg
d4046c69d337034ca890cd219f6a4024
19697e41919b32285266991da80d3d92d7e0fe43
F20110109_AABUGB grieb_m_Page_187.QC.jpg
15602fe7c454313289d0304304e1d81b
fdde875ae96509dfee481aa4e2cb6df80f0afb84
92656 F20110109_AABUTM grieb_m_Page_102.jpg
c33b86ee9a714c96af6f3f2afa37eb4c
e7b214bb7b695433a74e1241b1df33ea0be7a461
6511 F20110109_AABVQG grieb_m_Page_156thm.jpg
9ba5e1d8ebf4337c6039ae4827611508
4c45b5c67ab98419fe112578fd4dace9e933fd50
23549 F20110109_AABTWT grieb_m_Page_161.QC.jpg
ee701351331c8bb0962131621b4a1135
3c207a2acdc2d2a653cd9e96f58f83e57add857b
96452 F20110109_AABUTN grieb_m_Page_104.jpg
b017d3f8e9874039ae1efa48c1c6eb46
2fc976b81a04d4c4e2d6d6cb5df8f5ca6f778bb4
28025 F20110109_AABVQH grieb_m_Page_158.QC.jpg
68b7438c7d6759689192fac0f2bd0ac9
fec69665c29825da75b2da8aeb90cb135428ea9d
2134 F20110109_AABUGC grieb_m_Page_179.txt
764749b8c83d29f5869f19e9f52ada5f
f8d802683f62816496acd9a0a39fe7ad0a42bbcc
2203 F20110109_AABTWU grieb_m_Page_098.txt
c085f47e776c71c1a8d1cf3257647afe
8d32f581651d4ed6db0f74f3704261c6bf890cde
92635 F20110109_AABUTO grieb_m_Page_106.jpg
3696d0353a65ce66117de651d93b168e
220adbba04928668297f5851d38a3bd1954988e1
25170 F20110109_AABVQI grieb_m_Page_159.QC.jpg
75898ef59ddbfb464b0301166fdcf6b2
a5fdbb9d734c12434008a0b192f2dfc62f92eea3
F20110109_AABUGD grieb_m_Page_032.tif
eb33a84168931a9839415eda1a650c33
3478b9cc0b488cc5b794e071b0adf828783b90d7
26281 F20110109_AABTWV grieb_m_Page_136.QC.jpg
67e0987a6ef573e47c2f8845a319c541
996f3b4041ed8773e49d1c63d76944dd17743610
6135 F20110109_AABVQJ grieb_m_Page_159thm.jpg
e945fe2b93740a09abcfa2399c07af4a
820ae87da52f414d51cc7cbfc7cbdbd20c0c103f
26953 F20110109_AABUGE grieb_m_Page_108.QC.jpg
da191f70b812a64c4fd01b8655224284
17ef36bbb6b4329007a3a4ab9e3a11c8e7477704
6627 F20110109_AABTWW grieb_m_Page_158thm.jpg
9fe2ffc0f4ffe411e307e88ca80f9c14
821d42ab1aac32067ff33d8d125215f698d05848
86016 F20110109_AABUTP grieb_m_Page_107.jpg
3ba23a8fe9d326d03a07033d39e20911
baa7e5c371dd351d02ef79840eda5065c865040f
2140 F20110109_AABUGF grieb_m_Page_086.txt
967534c2a3aa5ac7db934e367c60c346
2e5652ae181f7402ab5cda5c566b5cc070dea46d
F20110109_AABTWX grieb_m_Page_025.tif
78ac1c9d366718d0c1b31fe373449c37
e36cbcd59ca6f263696d7ce29a6bfd47580e5bde
86894 F20110109_AABUTQ grieb_m_Page_108.jpg
6291ecdbfb275f0aa38bb7339c48a8be
a74dfe2ee65e3be715153b7f1303f0f17a6886da
22929 F20110109_AABVQK grieb_m_Page_163.QC.jpg
a8cc0ae231e0f170f48cb1e187ee9e62
2bf4dbca1207bb7388aed65fbdb7efadd1763c81
58123 F20110109_AABUGG grieb_m_Page_063.pro
44993d1851c75dfd503f9dedd5cb5031
96106750dd424001e5fb86eb95decf80b0f7d346
24796 F20110109_AABTWY grieb_m_Page_209.QC.jpg
f42ac86ca208c0b1e161c18f34a2206d
9dc942b8c139eed855d42cade78a187be0ae3d9d
84514 F20110109_AABUTR grieb_m_Page_109.jpg
dd0b66d25f29ddb53f7db3e803e63cab
d5ead68e2b32a3ff8c942019685be65d35fe9c70
26709 F20110109_AABUGH grieb_m_Page_059.QC.jpg
2e9f8ddb5c50cb8ee406429da1f52ecc
430ef9043e4a9ef7ec4ef24317fa75b1f812ca57
64629 F20110109_AABTWZ grieb_m_Page_007.jpg
e171d7793492baac65497d1fc7631249
3f24e5810976ff716d1bc3d24dd4c78f7534701c
F20110109_AABVDA grieb_m_Page_222.tif
d590f62ba4ee2c0bc57264beb50ec165
db397007ea83c2a8fd33a08e17e861cbc8e6fb09
88274 F20110109_AABUTS grieb_m_Page_110.jpg
00750c58c12981ee7b0c60c6ee9d08a8
c0924f51bf3d497475ab8c62db16431d79cac587
5667 F20110109_AABVQL grieb_m_Page_163thm.jpg
9893537b1acbeae6cb690c4ed1f690d7
a9f53008c3a79f592e1238c067a8d1b8a548e001
52048 F20110109_AABUGI grieb_m_Page_094.pro
186fb311fb805c23c21fe71990cae519
57b69e9f087819cb6c5dfea72b197da36f722332
F20110109_AABVDB grieb_m_Page_223.tif
4b8a9fd2e3003343040183b9bb68e283
2d7c5333d49e69c9bc282e916cdf3f3c65e4fabe
85928 F20110109_AABUTT grieb_m_Page_112.jpg
6c8a718b67294610409ff517a217e62e
1fb72fa6fdcce160b63669c617493a340b6f93af
6425 F20110109_AABVQM grieb_m_Page_165thm.jpg
e6675a2aca24006de54b71fa78be6dc6
a0a614478df2437c0c9e7c47bfd757f442a2f9a0
88755 F20110109_AABUGJ grieb_m_Page_155.jpg
e010b2b5e0eefa23a7004836c7944a4e
a74fa7650c01006216450bd3233f9562984a5bca
F20110109_AABVDC grieb_m_Page_225.tif
194cb32626c53456921605113181e3fd
5f95ce8603926a384b513d45cbcf2b545ff542d6
81058 F20110109_AABUTU grieb_m_Page_113.jpg
f34c3a8820c0777d289e42358e717b17
4ff54de20b5bf67aac95ad047946bdf01ff24118
25847 F20110109_AABVQN grieb_m_Page_166.QC.jpg
98635b2736d6e7538a3a66e965a47bb3
82b0a8655bbb0f82f0bbd8665bd5abde22ac8695
6442 F20110109_AABUGK grieb_m_Page_138thm.jpg
c3cde48348c9242a4c25b8528fb4861f
a4b0c0ec1e2b18e31542e5ae477eb281f8e2bc7f
2438 F20110109_AABVDD grieb_m_Page_005.pro
ee8253aa11c3233a53ef31ce30658c73
d54cdcd43adbf19cdbfd66e671c6ae6cc7f44eff
85648 F20110109_AABUTV grieb_m_Page_115.jpg
12b5420e20e9cfde68e26dc86bc24d55
10fb27869cd4313212d3102a7334aa8cc608b186
6319 F20110109_AABVQO grieb_m_Page_166thm.jpg
bc58674b4b776533d5e47a95976a589d
96b3c5a3cf470213b16ff60267e69617b27c537b
26570 F20110109_AABUGL grieb_m_Page_011.QC.jpg
22c1cde94e03d3a398950d399a138007
51525ca1cca2e37d67e5dd7a7fcf6b7a5ff11f75
56627 F20110109_AABVDE grieb_m_Page_007.pro
4601bde40cd3e1ae22bf6833fa7f49d4
063f4cae4b3a54016aa31031dd2462dcd65cc957
82644 F20110109_AABUTW grieb_m_Page_116.jpg
740a9ad7658b310cc2da02a8751c6f9c
ba1757ca5904a78b2ab0a589cebd89c43e02fad8
26547 F20110109_AABVQP grieb_m_Page_168.QC.jpg
73859c240834b41ae279df817c46cf87
c00aee5530e9b6e6dd4976248bb02ea24f03eaab
118849 F20110109_AABUGM grieb_m_Page_058.jp2
090859209fcc108003ed9a27584ec7e9
248df114fee35d668fe46f0e1df2c1522533f101
13794 F20110109_AABVDF grieb_m_Page_009.pro
cb9d4550182192255b8121f3dd97d21d
e0066c02380bea998e20f8419fe6d4d8ec8d702d
87475 F20110109_AABUTX grieb_m_Page_117.jpg
4d1e8c43d951afa8ddb8224768a82c2d
7a97846ef92f1a1cb23107b605524dd8f69dfe1f
6354 F20110109_AABVQQ grieb_m_Page_168thm.jpg
acaee93826b8972a9653dc587d1d1ffc
ca7b47d43ce43cccf480303ac922ac77becb1682
50708 F20110109_AABUGN grieb_m_Page_030.pro
847a526b210bd2cb42481895d7a35b37
4a687cd7d3354088d897202f3c0ed4a4a5e7c770
48446 F20110109_AABVDG grieb_m_Page_013.pro
8505127a35617caa65dffbc69e3aa9ec
6eabf5e7d59550c79ab2886ca5c61d6c129c1b26
76597 F20110109_AABUTY grieb_m_Page_118.jpg
1bb928b606a47a3990efd01770872100
2b29f3368db9105a08bb563b042233c8d4e843df
25908 F20110109_AABVQR grieb_m_Page_169.QC.jpg
0d286f0cbae09ccaffbfb1feed8936a4
ae7880df9aee38da82d805c2ec774c87e6a817df
6521 F20110109_AABUGO grieb_m_Page_069thm.jpg
b0b630dda2b455aa7e93ff225ed8d005
33248d23f4c356b9eccb7ba0a2498b9485acf849
46764 F20110109_AABVDH grieb_m_Page_016.pro
56861d4c8f788862c1cd750479f87b9b
28c496d0a61b76d50ff287edaeba050a0ff2bd12
93551 F20110109_AABUTZ grieb_m_Page_125.jpg
2f29fec09e51415c6e2ff58f0824c88a
57e4668d63b42c81c45744bb01bfd4ad2cf1eed3
6056 F20110109_AABVQS grieb_m_Page_170thm.jpg
27209700746039470570de11ea8289e3
5b45f5f8b192cdab7e2955924ff2a913c89c95e2
2162 F20110109_AABUGP grieb_m_Page_053.txt
7aeeb39ad5edebbaa1937e5501072855
ff5793383f86169ac025142101604c13c7ffe830
47618 F20110109_AABVDI grieb_m_Page_020.pro
13b0d5601f45750bc1b5452c36462f97
5a2b2d3063e4ee0d77623f856cb1dfd6fcd88aa0
25809 F20110109_AABVQT grieb_m_Page_171.QC.jpg
c66e06c13efa1aee1f0b4795f6068085
49806ba708bca3a952666fa45b3de68b7b21f9ea
86262 F20110109_AABUGQ grieb_m_Page_182.jpg
6b481bd0898fb29bcfb37bd4b39ae273
cb67062f1ee5b258eba5bdd135440bdb24cf9ddd
47286 F20110109_AABVDJ grieb_m_Page_021.pro
b04f0c5a19cbf95e10bc787c64a1ab52
15e03a2a70395a00ca9d39e8674b255ba1cefcec
6423 F20110109_AABVQU grieb_m_Page_171thm.jpg
80907552ebdb758881b2e9c338a4c01e
1f291504ff4b759ed9c5ca4f556165f2a96ac50f
109554 F20110109_AABUGR grieb_m_Page_203.jpg
e5fc442b86e2c9b13b00cc66370d0aa6
70bd08c19404e876d69639a3894e8f7cc3ee9c10
59298 F20110109_AABVDK grieb_m_Page_023.pro
ca7147a2e86b74f694be2db3612631e6
01a664ae720ca5304da0480f0ae2cc2b4d9f7e37
27058 F20110109_AABVQV grieb_m_Page_172.QC.jpg
d0069c2a1343bde328e3072710d9837f
4d4a672eeafa48e4fac7ae9e04525e183b7bfcdd
114002 F20110109_AABUGS grieb_m_Page_078.jp2
20d58a0c19dfd691307ffa4eda44e7e5
74905c6dfdfcd4476236444fd02ac0aa7b71e7cd
60994 F20110109_AABVDL grieb_m_Page_024.pro
c38f22da2ea8a7f838df1752180f0105
272043a8d6edc085b3c156d8b33d4edadf5f4d77
6397 F20110109_AABVQW grieb_m_Page_172thm.jpg
a5d9eca38db0dcc1d17dae7bd9937dcd
651982e1f8a919873745a5161d18fab188593873
1937 F20110109_AABUGT grieb_m_Page_074.txt
1c1b5d798f84c6b498e9c9403beb4253
b5a0aa76918fc115fc882a00291d386e84142bc2
59349 F20110109_AABVDM grieb_m_Page_025.pro
617d1268860219dec202e3ee9ddc7dac
a881ec3c2d62612867d6931eeb2f58543ab3fe8e
25049 F20110109_AABVQX grieb_m_Page_173.QC.jpg
1aae9a6a978a7e1d95e51ef8934c5153
3ea969a49a700cec81559d974fc70319b3f45733
111278 F20110109_AABUGU grieb_m_Page_211.jp2
de80da194a53e93ff52509f08e255a04
ca16b43a59258f9ef1ccbf49d53565b423118401
53569 F20110109_AABVDN grieb_m_Page_026.pro
0b0fb4a8e3a94adca4f47bd68c5dbad1
233d7ff9b566a1bc488990e4d83f591bbf0185f4
5984 F20110109_AABVQY grieb_m_Page_173thm.jpg
bde5d6441552b8c71472edfaf4a48513
3195adf9b735f68599a5b56889b8c83f4cba35a1
5959 F20110109_AABUGV grieb_m_Page_032thm.jpg
af75a35625662ae8e1628d42ab2c989a
5a62a9124bd3322a3bf5e7e65de5a86a34e2dca2
74587 F20110109_AABVDO grieb_m_Page_027.pro
c622ad0bedaaf822b68db6c7dce1843f
2bbc38dbb593225a7cff001a955d81d595e23ff6
27305 F20110109_AABVQZ grieb_m_Page_174.QC.jpg
3a4d5a67f81d7e8879e679919c83c52c
6d61dc0d7b75d03f3515a12fa2d4f1d92a4bd0c9
6424 F20110109_AABUGW grieb_m_Page_035thm.jpg
158a97b54cad3640f5eab78a26683b14
e6b5aab4dd044e7d24f3a6192ca95afdc94ce650
53072 F20110109_AABVDP grieb_m_Page_028.pro
398ada187dd5eb8de92d5aabb2b190af
079f91f7774fc75aa431745112c3c54b4cb3b815
6569 F20110109_AABUGX grieb_m_Page_063thm.jpg
e73303e850afaad2172df4ff9a86ea2d
e0333a5178723d66ee109843ec280e6160ac8388
59760 F20110109_AABUZA grieb_m_Page_225.jp2
6e43c6525823dc0dbe9b0eac51963454
fa2f92407a3fcafec97f1c18ce6d93bf69224e85
61620 F20110109_AABVDQ grieb_m_Page_029.pro
d505d849a495765fc4ce0ddbf6539dd7
5215244644fa6b0477fc10826ad98385a326f306
111306 F20110109_AABUGY grieb_m_Page_186.jp2
13ace3649ff1b5ce9fc95e0ea796f95d
90cb1e6d309be94c3fda92d305bc2286692f5196
F20110109_AABUZB grieb_m_Page_001.tif
4e142f721d099d33223eee879acd93f5
13e9a7680ea382e9e8ac2935da7b4e210e37e6d1
50429 F20110109_AABVDR grieb_m_Page_032.pro
4476bbbcd1cba8c893b34836962e1013
ce51b5afddbb6aaea4eeb81e017121c9eb62ff47
26670 F20110109_AABUGZ grieb_m_Page_179.QC.jpg
e13c3af76948b053f47175d024f6121c
e46c4ca8ce4e0022ac9dd614d9156e746c906b27
F20110109_AABUZC grieb_m_Page_003.tif
b1eabf234db5503a38c9c2a59833d8af
c4979fc3d67e8abfcc0649fceb94b99854ed4998
67377 F20110109_AABVDS grieb_m_Page_033.pro
4c85cf63a474bf93f0e978320609709b
08936118ce78df6e15e4a7993385e1ad7ccb23e2
F20110109_AABUZD grieb_m_Page_004.tif
630655f51deeeeea73833cd5369e5f54
e34294e0bd5697dfe1e76cf9a1b2f2bb2bbd8109
65084 F20110109_AABVDT grieb_m_Page_038.pro
0a8487e0bacd0132fcc4fb8f41379635
02bb5015edba4b662bc17d43df12585566a6b255
F20110109_AABUZE grieb_m_Page_006.tif
409edc694637b89204da5fd61e3aeb70
be390e36dfcbfae21f9ad379e99225cc0be920da
54751 F20110109_AABVDU grieb_m_Page_039.pro
45b78ab17780f25986fc8e7eba1f57fe
8be7375617a61a6e51282f5ed6994534f9b0024b
110681 F20110109_AABTPA grieb_m_Page_096.jp2
b316c230109986c08b8e2d6794e62c22
4813ac93fc4dabcdc96d0d6970d34f493b06bc64
F20110109_AABUZF grieb_m_Page_009.tif
5eca0b728eb9ef707c71722e3b0c5c7c
235810497478f0cae19c173d24183ac2f0d91cf2
79859 F20110109_AABVDV grieb_m_Page_044.pro
e01a2edb71f6698b7419585a5ac6022e
2c33186d4f275e21b1dbee84734d2746469b231b
833 F20110109_AABTPB grieb_m_Page_003.QC.jpg
a33b61f3f02e2281151a7fd6121399ea
d523a39a520c77921952a4010102cef640dc0983
F20110109_AABUZG grieb_m_Page_012.tif
6dfaa8a1df3ac8d41fc2c072a23ec6da
aa1b09d1a2aac09b04727f212675d1dba8de3e7d
62767 F20110109_AABVDW grieb_m_Page_048.pro
7cadb910aaab680cbe11147ef1f0f148
b826cb2800b34a423609ba43e4856216b9ff73f6
131556 F20110109_AABTPC grieb_m_Page_131.jp2
87294dc6e41b515071b18baed31b939b
9658bc2af184dceae6add41816729a9ea5ab7cb7
F20110109_AABUZH grieb_m_Page_013.tif
9115379cc6fc504bda1e929360b179ad
9ddb24db66d4b126dbd7890575c9607d598c385a
57157 F20110109_AABVDX grieb_m_Page_049.pro
8ba27aab43a4af8f2df79b523e94c314
9b15b54c76503c19126be893070a49667e235307
26959 F20110109_AABTPD grieb_m_Page_165.QC.jpg
886a3ae59107437b11e215d382c74432
c6b3d5078ddaf9d7fbe49f2ecabee533819fb1f7
F20110109_AABUZI grieb_m_Page_016.tif
450d81a0270fe49f4c124913d0f67a8a
c04ca4776207691711d2101101027a53a6967423
59042 F20110109_AABVDY grieb_m_Page_050.pro
58f57b4024b56dafb90f045234abd297
930d517eddcae2b0041240e1bec0bf0ccc05b93b
160464 F20110109_AABTPE grieb_m_Page_068.jp2
bbd4212f79517d301d58595b0d734915
bf0e8464cc9a3a93bb949a3113409ff5d2ff1e6d
F20110109_AABUZJ grieb_m_Page_017.tif
28c4679b28b520194bcbe2c8aad7338e
65b6d2ba4b3724b5b2420d24b842eed793b82b1d
63671 F20110109_AABVDZ grieb_m_Page_052.pro
5f5fe5f54d4158b4d2331339ae8180e7
0f241c111f0f9ca0a6a953d8b029c50f1788ae12
27099 F20110109_AABTPF grieb_m_Page_111.QC.jpg
9c7647a904ede6c46c3d411c052a0461
86eae2f3769bfa5fab99904de15f1babef819c85
F20110109_AABUZK grieb_m_Page_018.tif
76e8b412c7c8c4eb42f56dbb52ab0785
c7caa2fd9c3491b9315ae1f692efd27f43ecd9b1
F20110109_AABTPG grieb_m_Page_219.tif
adf043923e27ed4afde09b2988f18520
0e8f7dc39d6ab09522813a5a55aa166cb51cc86b
136732 F20110109_AABUMA grieb_m_Page_027.jp2
bb9a8daeff3d25f8a64c61ea4dfe0395
1e16159e55709691484c3a8831fd4867a7de6ee1
F20110109_AABUZL grieb_m_Page_020.tif
2434932196ad1c444cc2d246e00ee6ce
be23452e59e6e5bda7cd974cd3098329f6d94017
131538 F20110109_AABTPH grieb_m_Page_167.jp2
6f706774396849759172075e686a2428
862640eac1c3b57d44aff1c0d64f16989321cfeb
97924 F20110109_AABUMB grieb_m_Page_130.jpg
07e73c476433932883fff1f888a55d0b
c76a33c3989cfe4736c8be83105e778417b5203b
F20110109_AABUZM grieb_m_Page_024.tif
5ea5d1a76004b1aa16592fdb31f15506
6fa1ea6944022e68cbdff4570d86ae1734377855
6688 F20110109_AABTPI grieb_m_Page_133thm.jpg
b92e64c2ae25532fad3a58687a486d06
183943eac79589c505e953f9313f6636a4ec101f
6617 F20110109_AABUMC grieb_m_Page_093thm.jpg
42923506e2c79771e6d6e96f079331ce
025d629fc8e9151938e2bff272997f9d121456c5
F20110109_AABUZN grieb_m_Page_027.tif
c7b9b4860c5cb052b542a9939b95523f
ad0dafffc285322b7b18194e691e5361fa357f04
53998 F20110109_AABTPJ grieb_m_Page_036.pro
b45a62d42640a44cc4e2835fa490d8a8
c92b08d8a722bda33f9aac30815fea24cd0c6923
92813 F20110109_AABUMD grieb_m_Page_111.jpg
581a3cc52f83232c98ef4da9b95076d9
8247c0504a41a6bd01fbb56a9fb949215f3e046c
F20110109_AABUZO grieb_m_Page_031.tif
5459690388d2d94ecf66a15b8fb5953f
c2343cf69c5c9e916dab5b8a18d61240a7a02baf
60901 F20110109_AABTPK grieb_m_Page_087.pro
e82064dd89e83a9863db7e25405b6bc7
907d2be81b0c96e55766345128ebd839cab4b945
108537 F20110109_AABUME grieb_m_Page_166.jp2
819d1561ae021e4c4e193bb004bbba61
bea73f640703fbbf860f5fc4d03dc77160c81b1e
F20110109_AABUZP grieb_m_Page_033.tif
ae314419a15816bcdf745146e23a6ded
ce9d267ff874a130c139d1c941569c9897576f08
113321 F20110109_AABTPL grieb_m_Page_145.jp2
cee17ffafb4a57630c4d82aed0f8c5af
abe13178684463a118e7a63f699cd49be04a6916
26696 F20110109_AABUMF grieb_m_Page_112.QC.jpg
bd9cedbb74aefd08cdd2285899a2abb5
cb0edc9a526d5724daa8cb1aba6c3329d32bddb0
F20110109_AABUZQ grieb_m_Page_034.tif
0272a30933c758623aebdf39d56862b9
d322ad566e6de5391ad11e7ee16e3e1c7c58fd4d
2060 F20110109_AABUMG grieb_m_Page_062.txt
2f0b97e43c631e6114b4c54d20c071dd
fad0cc4421dcc58453dc1c8d3e9fb7818416d665
F20110109_AABUZR grieb_m_Page_035.tif
dc4f0c8ede6547a0e9a2641b3c3ca534
c61c9a7abb8109805ab3615cefb27e3b3b89a176
24743 F20110109_AABTPM grieb_m_Page_170.QC.jpg
aff1a7745b3a23367dffe801e61050b9
44f307089a93cfabc99b9ceaebc3cfa788ce5b86
F20110109_AABUMH grieb_m_Page_114.txt
da18ec0d6d9d0584d17401789e58dceb
2a76cf9c094afc6ab05f8e90480e7b0ff57b9dc3
2121 F20110109_AABVJA grieb_m_Page_134.txt
d26fdeb11686e1d8f27429b862485836
5cff4db0380a49c980decd8d45c0a145006eceb9
F20110109_AABUZS grieb_m_Page_037.tif
18192870ab9d239f856f2e844c2f2c3a
905e4f20c81bb499b65ab518b61bbcc90b3b314d
6329 F20110109_AABTPN grieb_m_Page_034thm.jpg
ab1ef07d464a3939343b6e1bf699b05e
c194126a780d1aa5e42514a1a0cb9ea534ba42c0
2021 F20110109_AABVJB grieb_m_Page_135.txt
d90548f62b0c9887df53a51332e0559a
fa78de8928791e015d88e880eb82fd84f470d993
F20110109_AABUZT grieb_m_Page_038.tif
ea11ff4b195b65bfcbe45a131ddd91c3
049ad43dca07735a5ac42a85810d5f17c3f8e41a
92886 F20110109_AABTPO grieb_m_Page_010.jp2
1c922098b98be8620fcabcf3a63246d4
d81d8bad2a041758d7bd635dc3dd2dc1912617bd
6304 F20110109_AABUMI grieb_m_Page_178thm.jpg
016434d7ae7e4c7148f9270f5696ff43
0a53a680c3f32df202fa577de0395b09b7aa7ec7
2035 F20110109_AABVJC grieb_m_Page_136.txt
74e901a983c3aa4bffe55812ddeae77a
27c3875550e0ed593af496b9db39ee8870dd63e3
F20110109_AABUZU grieb_m_Page_039.tif
34295b05f5d536072381de2f2a4657bb
708c5b6c163d0f91a3b2302f8f566e00d2ae9eec
55412 F20110109_AABTPP grieb_m_Page_053.pro
d133335cf15c9351c9d9f9238322eace
c1dee0ce532ed74955af00dd181d746d774525f0
3221 F20110109_AABUMJ grieb_m_Page_141.txt
1d321567d77e5cac63ed99007c9ee600
3f8ad92efb0bef4010b3027f17e60b4c6165dc25
F20110109_AABVJD grieb_m_Page_139.txt
7c6c893b5673fb97ab312f393443b5e9
d9664fe9710a33de46e66e2809de4c88099f3827
109503 F20110109_AABTPQ grieb_m_Page_085.jp2
72408a56898756b4bd9479a4f5344540
23bb8f0992bde89514615da70a04adc259ea9cff
F20110109_AABUMK grieb_m_Page_112.tif
fb583125cb24c4e7128d47c526d78118
7252530b20dfefefd24ec461f50100152d670e56
F20110109_AABUZV grieb_m_Page_040.tif
d9e8ecf04d5fad4225a14f8793e9e2ef
7cbc9735edcc5c911b2de3da3118b5a0685757ae
117040 F20110109_AABTPR grieb_m_Page_195.jp2
4d12000ebb44c2af1335efd9b5e1b4da
bee14143452e4031a9930d59880b8c3b791186eb
56717 F20110109_AABUML grieb_m_Page_060.pro
9c4a69fb2303f194d04759c2e4ec9011
e5eb09c1e469209ac154ab240ee9149d8e9beb14
2357 F20110109_AABVJE grieb_m_Page_140.txt
1e167a3ab7ac31584144bf8cdb8e55aa
8401c370019f5ed58556cde6bf3613cc40fd1e3d
F20110109_AABUZW grieb_m_Page_044.tif
e06c2f5214a12ec3b89a4df377555a17
0909ae357b74760e50fc1265efae2c41ae09ebdc
2468 F20110109_AABTPS grieb_m_Page_061.txt
b1f3b99c8db01bf21f00b480fe507b8c
cff79b34e00e8367d9e37ca40aab282bcc82b24c
F20110109_AABUMM grieb_m_Page_126.txt
3e170f9a0f3f1c448251856365f5a65f
7dc354a0cec4fe32163437a9720cb438ec6bf34f
2200 F20110109_AABVJF grieb_m_Page_143.txt
01f94cf7cb25f41c4cad4410321962bd
48425c103091b41b0eb676ff884b54ae40016497
F20110109_AABUZX grieb_m_Page_045.tif
074c119850922ad3f79ec92683ac6a0c
8f21581ab31e34d4f9226ee8c399c651335fc0ab
85466 F20110109_AABTPT grieb_m_Page_149.jpg
57da84a7b19111097e59be038070bac8
8ee9211b8c26ae31d4011af092080b092b000307
F20110109_AABUMN grieb_m_Page_120thm.jpg
920eaacdd96d0a2e737053bc0dc8ae61
802a5148e0a7b9d55d03d03c4e2a0c8cc924b098
2163 F20110109_AABVJG grieb_m_Page_144.txt
2573ac69f2ba57c8a948c6191dbf1d5e
f59666d09886b37b0032acbd3c5e2daf372d38f0
F20110109_AABUZY grieb_m_Page_046.tif
db53b5ba70cb7de597ff05da1aa764be
e78ddb6d9b93175bd12d074c6ba6ba3529ab92e4
105769 F20110109_AABTPU grieb_m_Page_113.jp2
c7ed026b4a62fed4c9380702b280c70d
048848c267b9c5f26c8d3c4b900c43bbc6da1181
2024 F20110109_AABUMO grieb_m_Page_185.txt
77635d8fcd1797e82de090f36ea25e2e
df1d3a5b3bf7aea7e16f97c3349eeefadcb320dc
2333 F20110109_AABVJH grieb_m_Page_147.txt
cd37e0128732e92808425b5485c79d70
b6a6aede64e920ca85cd0daab6ee3659a7b25025
F20110109_AABUZZ grieb_m_Page_048.tif
04deb1d7940a5b8137aafcff62cc81c8
be961204eba1cc25d7b5ac2445e1eba4d2954c65
90544 F20110109_AABTPV grieb_m_Page_206.jpg
1f26d712d34745a8f90e2764ebc08a94
9821159b18264b1be30044dc8187ed5a396b2bde
28767 F20110109_AABUMP grieb_m_Page_141.QC.jpg
2f93481189d156ad7594ee3cd96182bf
060087acea197a990c4f90395e2d8a7349bf2e03
2146 F20110109_AABVJI grieb_m_Page_149.txt
a5831f9763933c4586659ebbe9dbf467
681ac6d6d52402b32b43035feb3c7d93d8fddffc
F20110109_AABTPW grieb_m_Page_218.tif
222cddf0e3766b950e9885cbf4d9250e
24e5efbc52e992bab6837773e2c5b3fedf1daa7a
27504 F20110109_AABUMQ grieb_m_Page_077.QC.jpg
6a10b93c8c3e06ef2c448da35ec1c29f
51c6aa3fc7acb40db87c95290393ddb896096f88
3102 F20110109_AABVJJ grieb_m_Page_151.txt
e01b5b6ad5946f70d3147cf57f51c67e
9450f180b2c876e091f1b07eebd3e6176a185528
27841 F20110109_AABTPX grieb_m_Page_133.QC.jpg
02d4c1bdd89aa58793ce94ef15418130
a0e38677d4dd8f1912f68de3e1a639d63e73c26d
2564 F20110109_AABUMR grieb_m_Page_037.txt
8d99b446ec7fb280d7855b76f5795531
97d5f7504523bbc5cefd64bccc3b3a9f4c4975ea
2292 F20110109_AABVJK grieb_m_Page_152.txt
dc562f587d120999622999251bb9fc4d
ceaffe0695566b38dcfa52e7468cf71027543e9a
28083 F20110109_AABTPY grieb_m_Page_164.QC.jpg
613c9a6ed3c1917aea95903cf189830a
af78f652d3c118ad55caeec84d4651885aecf340
26155 F20110109_AABUMS grieb_m_Page_196.QC.jpg
66d7f4c1553ee270e7153b29e16429db
c7048bb49a1b41d4a88dd97f93f2f2f6ea07531e
2828 F20110109_AABVJL grieb_m_Page_153.txt
4d2e8dd97a39c9e16a75071558ac0ce0
c736c9a2b8b046d2050a938ed42e0766bc9d1387
6577 F20110109_AABTPZ grieb_m_Page_038thm.jpg
f8569e95bbc14c8458b25f3ce2d19b06
1c5ddbc88b36d1aa7f9549d5bedf84715e983ac1
2040 F20110109_AABVJM grieb_m_Page_154.txt
cefcd18305fa741fd5d5a2291bbbca4e
f1fbaa56972cd6fb4bb02b18f203591eca24c0a5
6228 F20110109_AABUMT grieb_m_Page_180thm.jpg
fa28137b4070287931a829c1144db86b
94695a356729fc7cce8c24910db5b70cf406a278
2170 F20110109_AABVJN grieb_m_Page_155.txt
39f7da986135a988688f16797fb89ea9
1da57510143bfc9966bcd03d33dba8c85d72e8ba
F20110109_AABUMU grieb_m_Page_021.tif
0753c7828b8878df10ceff93f847b9c8
5759a6bf628aa39a5120a8e87329dcea95ce154f
2402 F20110109_AABVJO grieb_m_Page_156.txt
00b7b5c08439493e9de5ba7e196ec716
a79eff9b4174b45246d45ac04ad08b7d8b8d179f
122271 F20110109_AABUMV grieb_m_Page_035.jp2
e4e0219ff12a35f96d54855031a28c0d
bdc09ccbecfe5245c49b417e105d2289c5f3eb6d
1938 F20110109_AABVJP grieb_m_Page_159.txt
e4c0041f0046f8ca7f302430be67c1cc
bb5c08f63e5fd16d570a2153ae598673294e6ce3
2393 F20110109_AABUMW grieb_m_Page_029.txt
5a40d7a6d76c184f586d214473285fb1
dc74e9eb934d1a9328ed9f09c385f794c9f33ea1
F20110109_AABVJQ grieb_m_Page_161.txt
ffde0137390c1f66f852927503286cfd
3a0ed13744d299934889dc743f3406c5b6ed2eae
6360 F20110109_AABUMX grieb_m_Page_169thm.jpg
92471463b259a15f7a2a1d36df771c65
a33a3435a3095a745ada5bd4853c90804456012e
1931 F20110109_AABVJR grieb_m_Page_163.txt
795ec027c2d81845ced193a51cff4281
8873d2bea74ea97ae6b6ac537dca5b21d1ef4398
2545 F20110109_AABUMY grieb_m_Page_093.txt
b88911859187296d794d85196a31e931
d6e74d8a96bf153326d8d3d0933b2575f0640d86
F20110109_AABVJS grieb_m_Page_166.txt
ca9dde0fbe4b17d5d133cf581b62ba2e
4990ef419652ed538a52644a86ca238b2d60c31e
55481 F20110109_AABUMZ grieb_m_Page_181.pro
26beb8155159a8764d3b2370b3851722
f6c3ea9aafbe89536858118700f967ac8beea1c9
2752 F20110109_AABVJT grieb_m_Page_167.txt
93788dee7d5b828c2462cf84ab5e7083
da678ce5f22598324ff97e57e36288cb7fde4883
2151 F20110109_AABVJU grieb_m_Page_170.txt
0b8418885f5ac1a22cd8da27225beca4
349e5c85b8d6ee86d7f9f576d62b5204d1b76771
2025 F20110109_AABTVA grieb_m_Page_096.txt
88e70890db4e615f6af440725f26171b
8edebf2923ef9808f5ff6bd4ee78d2c9fc411a5c
2433 F20110109_AABVJV grieb_m_Page_172.txt
2d470850ad6c39be28a6b304ebbf3e65
584b32e0dbf0b3aa011bfc5d735b30dad1b82666
111759 F20110109_AABTVB grieb_m_Page_011.jp2
ea2feb34c12f95087bdca4f803040d07
4e6bed7e603cc720262146a27a4c2bc334a01186
2228 F20110109_AABVJW grieb_m_Page_176.txt
7401ca9539173ba91529fed3490e31a8
54f5729a20defdbf1cd8a2f3be6afc6454e7db8d
82604 F20110109_AABTVC grieb_m_Page_169.jpg
aad4429c1ec93f1744aaa2b50bb65a79
67eca5af84e3a2152a63951c1940c0d229931c1d
1978 F20110109_AABVJX grieb_m_Page_180.txt
b7f03df2e7606b744610c933df389a72
23a8ac6845fb0c9cedd94651499f522963bb8d49
2566 F20110109_AABTVD grieb_m_Page_133.txt
71913f262ee18f15d85f58e2ec1dac44
54d0b75caff229c6f133d77088c63e430047ec84
2103 F20110109_AABVJY grieb_m_Page_186.txt
f55d2149823a3d85d11340906ebe1621
cc08919d4ebdf8eb732f2057c745e212a14ffc17
F20110109_AABTVE grieb_m_Page_083.tif
06e5f79fa1996f92147dd8a14261b058
ea6e6d8612390735df28c677d6cb3dda7a18ae75
1925 F20110109_AABVJZ grieb_m_Page_188.txt
fe28c701df65b5f315ab8f87e73e5c05
ebe0737bd595e7e03ca1aad69fa6c5295bb571f5
6259 F20110109_AABTVF grieb_m_Page_116thm.jpg
4d4234fe50b1dcc8d50683157551b3ad
39d852a219fe2af482a531dd905aaae337275d55
F20110109_AABTVG grieb_m_Page_195.txt
c4f1930b6d6e0d24838763ac8e1d2b88
d41a27dcf63714781f21f5fc4500da77a9c34167
48862 F20110109_AABTVH grieb_m_Page_012.pro
d67c4b31eff19297a21585e4000a63a3
a1cda06804269855fe70cbeac6b320440cd2d468
91091 F20110109_AABUSA grieb_m_Page_024.jpg
af381451e603c58984e77e03ce76e0a2
2c14fd63652352fb243107815285d09d5406d352
90084 F20110109_AABTVI grieb_m_Page_083.jpg
1d508f3ecde38090df591f21994aebd2
95846cfee06a10a718862e905c8f18f9f68cd4dc
91911 F20110109_AABUSB grieb_m_Page_029.jpg
8ed6f907d381dc71166d402fd03cae9e
bd71bb6c8657ba1a4ffd0cec8b276a3f0cf3d3d5
121508 F20110109_AABTVJ grieb_m_Page_072.jp2
3a08cf9cc6af395658f613807244ded6
fc46c938e27aa1b40b352d4338983af3426ce820
80754 F20110109_AABUSC grieb_m_Page_030.jpg
6102c9fc0ab0e9001524b47e6129e5af
f1313c8708cc7ce2282a5c7fc96eb6c48803e254
7666 F20110109_AABTVK grieb_m_Page_001.pro
d9f72838d81e11143f5cbebbdb41000a
acc4b535225404f9830fdeb6562fa8adc11e2f95
97138 F20110109_AABUSD grieb_m_Page_033.jpg
2fac7cd33f596f0d30994cb7bd544747
642ab45ca6872d150b6dcfff1d5bfced7a7d7142
26361 F20110109_AABTVL grieb_m_Page_094.QC.jpg
0a703c796ba7955459b4999c834007f4
ce4a1527af6c7ebd81e0224b3a96edfd8d70b73f
89083 F20110109_AABUSE grieb_m_Page_034.jpg
382a842c4a5a569292844fc4d9e28c4a
6311d7e0d79276200b8e5516c7201d68468c7406
110792 F20110109_AABTVM grieb_m_Page_043.jp2
63c8f13de1e58e39fcecebc105b98f80
40e093fa6e30bfc9ff31a05cdacd39ed5cd724d7
97728 F20110109_AABUSF grieb_m_Page_037.jpg
c9d50365c1d57d2c8c99cc37144141ec
cf18351e3e2401378df05a341014e56e7ef91632
F20110109_AABTVN grieb_m_Page_101.txt
9c1426ab81bc913e100d7322ca89bf13
18bceef8001a27fd4253255574228b08686b56a3
87972 F20110109_AABUSG grieb_m_Page_039.jpg
fb5e22d691ea6212da2f1565c956a710
61395d0c510e0ad481bb3e016adc118a656dd0d6
6527 F20110109_AABVPA grieb_m_Page_117thm.jpg
0caf7346af4816b30ab34dcd5f7593df
d29bbf68435cb0bc4658590f25db70649860cabf
F20110109_AABTVO grieb_m_Page_118.tif
4a8ef244013a4cf5bcf625d4a04293bd
57f654d5bea899fc2068ef7af153fc5a66f7ae53
91046 F20110109_AABUSH grieb_m_Page_040.jpg
accd9539a3e714a6e9e19a20d28ba97b
718e307facce4679ab366ba040c23af01e5fea05
22931 F20110109_AABVPB grieb_m_Page_118.QC.jpg
6454895991fd68a95f79bafd434e3165
5b315ae1202412c5fd704751939c5ebd42da2ae0
F20110109_AABTVP grieb_m_Page_078.tif
b289a9d5863de7d4f5b55cd4f4fedecb
c55e852927202e694041f1e8cbc35071e5076920
90159 F20110109_AABUSI grieb_m_Page_041.jpg
3f423ca2cc9ff953f5bb43feb83db8a5
8b76bb02ea083e9b5303266c608bf92bf1e15df5
27072 F20110109_AABVPC grieb_m_Page_119.QC.jpg
220d6bb38cbc7c741417737ecd00cac8
6cbc943d593042ce624a792270921186211346f4
112270 F20110109_AABTVQ grieb_m_Page_059.jp2
65e16379828954e3bd6a9a33a741e4d9
d2335f9667efa4025f0c6113da0def3b7d74ca32
88355 F20110109_AABUSJ grieb_m_Page_042.jpg
a6389dd1540a02f2a79a2585ab3dcc8e
4d74b1fb5e846c4449cb974820c64643f17d0c5e
6399 F20110109_AABVPD grieb_m_Page_119thm.jpg
27592cf6a20c561ae5f717043ffb0996
5a5cba3798ee7c1de497b140e04eca22cbd29043
71183 F20110109_AABTVR grieb_m_Page_081.pro
88208b08f2735b47e1f4259b1550de9d
bf2c8d1f9c663b25bae94236b49c8b820d25b2cc
87333 F20110109_AABUSK grieb_m_Page_045.jpg
f9c278424c16747384d2efc1bfa77fa1
b62132903faa58742f88b65f3fe4edb28a0f03b9
26515 F20110109_AABVPE grieb_m_Page_120.QC.jpg
860177682283ff5456b47a8638852d30
5cf47be91c87afda6141614d75180423ac5a0628
90058 F20110109_AABUFA grieb_m_Page_058.jpg
030538bd07ca43a9ae3926fae977c705
544116390ca0196aa6240ae7f763d3dd2f8ed092
92772 F20110109_AABUSL grieb_m_Page_046.jpg
126d41a771f7f23018f797e29c302f0a
c36bddb004da11b231fefebd9ddd07a9fcaba723
6280 F20110109_AABVPF grieb_m_Page_121thm.jpg
644400574de875c7ce14936696cb121c
a35848b404f98b463084fbef74e09777f1c97b14
20843 F20110109_AABTVS grieb_m_Page_065.QC.jpg
998b597d776a3a743a0e4bfcfdda27a6
bd98e9d618bb3ec2ca2b84fcb596ab4ae29ff86a
91933 F20110109_AABUSM grieb_m_Page_049.jpg
85d4d887a741033a462c732ff7da1b14
996c204e7da5d303ce236ca84d0305691ace9561
6419 F20110109_AABVPG grieb_m_Page_123thm.jpg
b9a3f8662437b3020e1ccec3db9c107c
1858489f97b60f8a00909a7f33d1d4e55da32b5c
109885 F20110109_AABUFB grieb_m_Page_132.jp2
2fabbd394d7080326711cae5d7ace83e
9846aee751162112eea3c373cf08c0dc24c84425
F20110109_AABTVT grieb_m_Page_102thm.jpg
87cd9494626916178bcfdf022d24e88a
8e5c9890ba899a76c267d8f5e2d32c2f60d19941
88306 F20110109_AABUSN grieb_m_Page_050.jpg
3cc96ccf90141c6675611cbef082e608
9c2ec396d70f8e9f9e74003018e445820ad509b8
28159 F20110109_AABVPH grieb_m_Page_125.QC.jpg
264dcea0997096ee4041d37c98c54508
56db9886c445d208044b9a2a25e41fd0bebe143d
111168 F20110109_AABUFC grieb_m_Page_115.jp2
754a498db8a961396ef17d34eccae0a2
dfb83958d4e902652732eb424fdd75bf1cf69bcc
2097 F20110109_AABTVU grieb_m_Page_080.txt
ba97ca03310de48f7c32e16cab58b3ec
8b9bf444c4a00dbab1d33e37c0187adca92fc3e3
6576 F20110109_AABVPI grieb_m_Page_125thm.jpg
e32eabeddef3c1bd9e5063d4066527e4
de6d2c62918ac9d94b1d55813b329a8ccd5fa118
85622 F20110109_AABUFD grieb_m_Page_192.jpg
7eebc629f8010f5f198f394ed4f45434
371ac1da98fdaff823313812d4ad06c6ccd870e6
104977 F20110109_AABTVV grieb_m_Page_151.jpg
bdcd774e1845fa4121fc99344b3b538c
2cc17b4209fd4005dd2437f741a4bab0f45cc115
92953 F20110109_AABUSO grieb_m_Page_052.jpg
c32ff4a48f87e95c9cc843fe371dcc43
56a2d2b4b2de6438d6db41819f32ade2cb018a24
24291 F20110109_AABVPJ grieb_m_Page_127.QC.jpg
8ddad8ab4ff05d92c982514df537d56f
8fdb289483dd1b0ae76e56f440adbbe28897bf7c
113931 F20110109_AABUFE grieb_m_Page_205.jp2
8f44561aeb5d98e64b5821a64cd6f969
f12b616b4a45850cda84db7daae60225130a39fc
138397 F20110109_AABTVW grieb_m_Page_081.jp2
9ea0f85ed302db63fcacd1c472b3bdac
4f31246d86b891ba46ed2e628b45fd4c71992622
94210 F20110109_AABUSP grieb_m_Page_055.jpg
ef0d842538a6831da8d04d7d7781d7cb
3d017319743a1eefa9bc10b1000f34ecd5f9d829
111658 F20110109_AABUFF grieb_m_Page_062.jp2
fd9fa5878b0c19377abfb9f6cfb1db42
1d6ba11c346381012c681c68b8e2c4ea0e744d6f
3607 F20110109_AABTVX grieb_m_Page_068.txt
fda437d8dd81500f3f7abcffd4ff6783
6897277e19ff6d1f5add317aef51d1b11d3cc6b6
84083 F20110109_AABUSQ grieb_m_Page_057.jpg
62ffda7081e2ef8807de93818a573d79
dcb9ec6b1a75933c42c21002bf34a1179ce4e3a5
5185 F20110109_AABVPK grieb_m_Page_128thm.jpg
5afbd7363a3cc2ed8b8007611b7ee786
43bc3137c6584103710599abe44222b095e19fef
84289 F20110109_AABUFG grieb_m_Page_191.jpg
ec5e6930890d95c07ad7b89d4728b388
c370fee6018d6b4105d65de5dac442ee3c078d4f
F20110109_AABTVY grieb_m_Page_029.tif
f94812770345779093dd892489e36358
ab473ba02ffc0120fee23c3f64f2cbd92aa80a83
87083 F20110109_AABUSR grieb_m_Page_060.jpg
9956c37e99a0513778535daebadd22b8
6461f7ed4fa4f6823593934961d3208435bfc0e5
27490 F20110109_AABVPL grieb_m_Page_129.QC.jpg
57a07f2b5cf7553d050457fe30c13f44
13f1ca1d2d31652c42aae4aedf7dc5c8c73ccaca
25864 F20110109_AABUFH grieb_m_Page_057.QC.jpg
5b2a915db54a79de69992c1422c83a8f
7390e294dd3d0b6588d870fb10ea2d39c91fdab0
2166 F20110109_AABTVZ grieb_m_Page_181.txt
8ea7779cf9a5cdbb62f11a524c3e429a
ba4e8582e65629781389a147587f1f64e7e2dd5f
F20110109_AABVCA grieb_m_Page_172.tif
bb19781241d9af4f0e27d6963388638d
8e2eb558fde063bbebc34bb3ed744704a802c475
93937 F20110109_AABUSS grieb_m_Page_063.jpg
cc9de4c2ce61d080ad7ec2cee436c0bb
7b43251fff339f5c440d69a3662ae3576fa1e949
27959 F20110109_AABVPM grieb_m_Page_130.QC.jpg
7eb249998eea7c0761869df9ab0087a6
1c8cbeac316e5ee266e4fefff8cb4b2cf0ea80fd
76186 F20110109_AABUFI grieb_m_Page_163.jpg
cc2e189ce3b6e2c4ed806983d9621ebd
6b77d5c2cf3debb918b8c7de00d98e91ed9a5c49
F20110109_AABVCB grieb_m_Page_175.tif
d9de6a44a91be148adf79a3879ae2db2
7b09bb11b47e31132890ad6978ede5cfb61c14ad
38068 F20110109_AABUST grieb_m_Page_064.jpg
00aad13d5b457c01433bb3c7996f8762
b825b83f5c7ec8e2990a155f25b496c4a412ca2f
F20110109_AABVPN grieb_m_Page_130thm.jpg
4cd8e4b4ac57d9baa861abea866f1e18
a9642383ef86471c71a1f70e8b3b002e07359a72
94051 F20110109_AABUFJ grieb_m_Page_194.jpg
1649d4b8b90bd4072dc9439fbbdb58b4
5fb0436ff588ebfc486d1fa6be31271d188c93c7
F20110109_AABVCC grieb_m_Page_176.tif
d21a04053a021d3039a82b7bb6c1da9b
bfa8bf499a7ba5c8b0392e744304984e67bb55a2
66253 F20110109_AABUSU grieb_m_Page_065.jpg
aa70c6ed09422278a727cdc4e91a7cbd
04486ae5e964bafb8bd1f82a7b3a7ff604276532
27144 F20110109_AABVPO grieb_m_Page_131.QC.jpg
0ab6ac86f9f4c5bd802b9a4fdfc59ef8
13ef737f0580dce0c8309a9f8817b11d7508b20a
121583 F20110109_AABUFK grieb_m_Page_025.jp2
d92631453013f61dca568fa8d893771f
e29bb0fcb1fba1a959a0affced1a4bdbc6055770
F20110109_AABVCD grieb_m_Page_177.tif
8a376d69f19204c3a5481c4ae5a1a120
379124a7e74b8266ff4573932165c5d61fc2180f
82740 F20110109_AABUSV grieb_m_Page_066.jpg
4a62256600f1fb8286e3dec3cc6a9b69
e65ce3e162dff358e0a2a87564a8bafd9b441995
6519 F20110109_AABVPP grieb_m_Page_131thm.jpg
021a2f14bccd477235e4c4d37fcb3ebb
7065bae63257d98400a9b887c0c6837768cc3978
F20110109_AABUFL grieb_m_Page_047.tif
d305b975fae0969ef36be08bdefeab4c
ae73f0ff32be3e456fc58234bfd314572c07f836
F20110109_AABVCE grieb_m_Page_178.tif
0481ab2d7c99296a7ccab7036b477376
f727b0afaf745efaa4830d0257d46826b05c18ee
91396 F20110109_AABUSW grieb_m_Page_071.jpg
8a8d2e4e5e0a6c07cb1b79212149c2d1
235d32854734c116bc8f75dd5c2b68c25668f0cf
6199 F20110109_AABVPQ grieb_m_Page_134thm.jpg
5bb3496c12af473a78528129f8c8bff3
d7dc17a53f5ed0b0e440c23443f8ade310426877
147375 F20110109_AABUFM grieb_m_Page_203.jp2
4dff88c7a17c92ce8d913933d7dd64b7
e6cce454d9769e59de1b8a2fb6f134a8f100001b
F20110109_AABVCF grieb_m_Page_180.tif
cf03ce5007b91aee1c907625b1cdef19
958b40bc89d9f7cd9d1d48a0d898816721e53866
84660 F20110109_AABUSX grieb_m_Page_075.jpg
dd095bd846ec756741f5dd1d7c554a21
2217830a5c54f5c4034cd9fa70b5f1c04b9464be
26450 F20110109_AABVPR grieb_m_Page_135.QC.jpg
06763fb01b49c3162ffc45aca389d52c
0db4f55b8a88b0b7b819e88b61bb2310dab1e35f
6484 F20110109_AABUFN grieb_m_Page_152thm.jpg
6732d105971b36cc9a69fe738857f573
74992a20fbfe075a7286b0afea6bf6b44cf97133
F20110109_AABVCG grieb_m_Page_181.tif
c58e7c4da0d690128fee23ed50e884be
f9f61bd1fc53b1d28b80563ce56e42c3850ccfba
91561 F20110109_AABUSY grieb_m_Page_079.jpg
012e2acb2a582fc6c4083d2674139f84
59f2ad14e834f5a9165e3aeb477dacb6821852f4
25441 F20110109_AABVPS grieb_m_Page_137.QC.jpg
fbeb66c2d43492ad1234a02b3cbfb60c
902a00cbe3d7367936995a75b68098af57927dd5
6457 F20110109_AABUFO grieb_m_Page_215thm.jpg
86334bc41c06c365d702bd2084a3a511
62859064c478327606ba4c69627e79ec1ec3224f
F20110109_AABVCH grieb_m_Page_182.tif
104f2b40cd43962a5869e3f460b90c00
9f8c7d1ae6b622884c2df340085c064a75cebd1c
104291 F20110109_AABUSZ grieb_m_Page_081.jpg
2c953851f9cca196c07b859b2eccc399
ad47dcfd5b480070c6af7410538e277d9fa20a36
26714 F20110109_AABVPT grieb_m_Page_139.QC.jpg
74e1cb4db56228610c769f49420a4fb8
924bd45b8a251a17e7fb1ae77d69377b8b95c64c
26807 F20110109_AABUFP grieb_m_Page_121.QC.jpg
39c43d638d4ba82533bc006dbccd2af5
39261a965bd8f5de8d00236121fb998c5e5c80de
F20110109_AABVCI grieb_m_Page_184.tif
56b30d76de85b8f06f012e4c0f111afd
cdb27fd05fd1331e04ce9c9db360fd0fad28f317
F20110109_AABVPU grieb_m_Page_139thm.jpg
b085ae2584010df76bd545020fb01e83
3a7113d7eaddf7b369a8f003847dde526693994b
86382 F20110109_AABUFQ grieb_m_Page_097.jpg
c4b4bac81755e3342a9e0da38fb8d557
e597619820d524a0444ce1571e66d1d72cece5aa
F20110109_AABVCJ grieb_m_Page_187.tif
e374882846130f3eafb376c2d43b0d5a
f7e49e57e614fdfb5110a8987960ac20326cb634
1761 F20110109_AABUFR grieb_m_Page_008.txt
4a0aa9f2380c3ff48a3acccd38d44927
bcc6585cd85d8cf3a7c3cf8aa36a9bc6343d82e5
F20110109_AABVCK grieb_m_Page_188.tif
b17341a7a3f679b1c83a76f61c8074d4
844c9fe735500e4ce7d692ef5140673144e9599f
27558 F20110109_AABVPV grieb_m_Page_140.QC.jpg
2c013467f505429181f854cc75c5329d
0e97b01dbf67cdd51ebccb624586ec36742f1452
26166 F20110109_AABUFS grieb_m_Page_095.QC.jpg
f1948edc4104369d1eaa84ff2bb84f66
a0dd3b587f89d00cb4f584432691bf7d6b182ddc
F20110109_AABVCL grieb_m_Page_189.tif
542a06044cfa051f880411e8251ca8bb
f3b1a20bf63cd189681942ac2b14d8440b83a00c
F20110109_AABVPW grieb_m_Page_142thm.jpg
de8db4e3b7c065e2d615ce6a87b8553d
adbd1a194e8fbd2d2c388d83fb3098fd1e5ac492
F20110109_AABUFT grieb_m_Page_050.tif
2725b0abdfdd5743d11eb5ac1f298e1b
4b3940c32c332981a8aab7b6d83426b30411556a
F20110109_AABVCM grieb_m_Page_190.tif
1e4ae616195ee282a31d1389f7ddefb2
a6c7b689aad305cc2745c3fb351097803bd68cdf
26788 F20110109_AABVPX grieb_m_Page_143.QC.jpg
3d8e9f56a6b0cff961b2ff499fd9d0d7
bf76ecefe9eb509f8b8b85fb854e500fa7e5937c
26989 F20110109_AABUFU grieb_m_Page_167.QC.jpg
97a50a7393859d4bf77555caf859eca5
06ba89208033fe5f097260a1183c32a5289e2e97
F20110109_AABVCN grieb_m_Page_191.tif
734d93ab87d34f6534928da322f7e45d
257ffcda28287d875c003f9ed80ff33ad99458d5
6305 F20110109_AABVPY grieb_m_Page_143thm.jpg
cf6b47b6a806285edc75e272ee8631a0
c8e11baeb2aea7a808cd045775e39a6a09ed6f2d
26292 F20110109_AABUFV grieb_m_Page_109.QC.jpg
a1575623f0f9f17b23e057857899fdb8
3a26c33cdf6ee7cedcaf9503f133505c7edf5afd
F20110109_AABVCO grieb_m_Page_193.tif
608b3225d52c8805341793db0ad7b7ae
da38e5b8598dbc24daf6e5777ad41361959b3ac8
6216 F20110109_AABVPZ grieb_m_Page_145thm.jpg
84be58f0697180797bc39fa883549570
d5e84f8c80f25cd1af878c184d1de6f950ad30b4
81679 F20110109_AABUFW grieb_m_Page_105.jpg
a00a354dbab47b8b12345fe475616b4e
121baf1a8084d7e1de74ddfef6885958880a8984
F20110109_AABVCP grieb_m_Page_195.tif
c2e3dd977002d22a9e9bce7822814107
34163b7c09a145f51e2855e4a839c21c4ef769f8
F20110109_AABUFX grieb_m_Page_186.tif
e801ab89f02c3dd3b91052a3cb744c2f
02354553cb1a4450d507b0aa47995de885f1e8b0
121428 F20110109_AABUYA grieb_m_Page_158.jp2
292d34a23d9f50f5d3ee8085b951705f
6f0bd245259af64fd292f08875f5e2b5502bf097
F20110109_AABVCQ grieb_m_Page_197.tif
3d722dc60d8c0948347c34b889ccd330
d1efaf0892a3a51925d5fd4d9f9e2e6b0d630b82
118924 F20110109_AABUFY grieb_m_Page_023.jp2
df03311aa368aff35a642e094f147c7e
0f6970cf5367336df1080309c497953e2d7486bf
104256 F20110109_AABUYB grieb_m_Page_159.jp2
055665f0de81510ece909dd4fb5eec26
0a20cafee637d467e297a6ccff3793245679322c
F20110109_AABVCR grieb_m_Page_199.tif
3dafa39fec3398ac27bf5c1302a540ac
2bdc40d23b88f1c95a2f4cdc450c8be0411343d7
66036 F20110109_AABUFZ grieb_m_Page_031.pro
ad6c6b74d8e0db3646d1fc6500310e15
48b07b004f66d0bdcce063738cbb7426b24b7d84
123110 F20110109_AABUYC grieb_m_Page_160.jp2
7b7896ca225b07dce274eb5a3f04cf05
36797bab8f31de08c2456794763261e59d3c41be
F20110109_AABVCS grieb_m_Page_202.tif
766a95128de142d76942beb75b2bb906
a3b619b664d23172bd66e29d2b73adbf2512413b
63353 F20110109_AABUYD grieb_m_Page_162.jp2
0af50834377f162b2a119a565efcec7c
9f6db674099cda8e50d10165bcff8037fe1e5c8b
F20110109_AABVCT grieb_m_Page_203.tif
2ec7b463a43f0d77ef680aa650d2ac81
eb4e8e48e74d9a48d3a0c392027665a9ab50bafc
112755 F20110109_AABUYE grieb_m_Page_168.jp2
6652b9c43c34ffcb14d17f5971f93b02
b36bf59e1a83021552e0fa5762e1d46729e55f26
F20110109_AABVCU grieb_m_Page_207.tif
881a21ce5597ffdb7cea0370bfbe0d0d
b02029d4a833e18d8208cc08bbfb5b48ffbff07a
F20110109_AABTOA grieb_m_Page_046thm.jpg
96d6c79b22b72905020580a5234edd54
3969537f091d417962193dbd86d50952fb9642f5
109455 F20110109_AABUYF grieb_m_Page_170.jp2
3008f462258c0588a927fb4f560f890a
912d8559aa5275649d90231a3182afb7b4368c28
F20110109_AABVCV grieb_m_Page_212.tif
e1c1f958e9b846ccc372e7b5a4ebd679
eaf68049ca8c9fe341ac37846b39c1ecec1c3dd5
52424 F20110109_AABTOB grieb_m_Page_120.pro
b34d220de7bb8d5fd819e2095b7f56b2
148e6d967b8d604462a634491fe3093c6efef917
117953 F20110109_AABUYG grieb_m_Page_176.jp2
4a91870b2c04a362f635fc640e1564e4
28b9c8fbfa09b5346eaddb2f39b6af724556c4dc
F20110109_AABVCW grieb_m_Page_214.tif
54bb67a0606d4ee7a38e6397483fa1f2
b42e9f0e45c85ba4c3b8e3b374f0b7d8dabbd6c5
62773 F20110109_AABTOC grieb_m_Page_069.pro
6cbc92dd4f8a4c95558b8398af42d002
595cbd029f85362f9379c9b9c3fa839a6a6c6862
114461 F20110109_AABUYH grieb_m_Page_179.jp2
66f55658d806f4ef2f3f911a3d95a7fe
b999a05f4faec4e986cf4dfdb1b13bdf50377e73
F20110109_AABVCX grieb_m_Page_217.tif
af50d4c606129ffa6bfd1b1fa82b92d5
6c51cec53b45abec687eb22201d5051031bb844b
F20110109_AABTOD grieb_m_Page_019.tif
549225df9f5d96269ad75ed86b5c1ab0
dcf48b4386638f5b94bc3ebb33d9fb106d243ba7
108340 F20110109_AABUYI grieb_m_Page_180.jp2
462058673d1794d799c5571a0683453f
4fe6c71cb5d0b5f60ac29cd9b72e0e3888433ca9
F20110109_AABVCY grieb_m_Page_220.tif
2186c7cca303a8fccc21896ff004e10b
611ad68eeb8c7d2f5e2098ada7c3963e7a9321e3
6362 F20110109_AABTOE grieb_m_Page_077thm.jpg
52290cc42abddee6b6baca31d310946f
c744e07b942a35028047c15421cb23ba87a6653a
104504 F20110109_AABUYJ grieb_m_Page_183.jp2
2f57f4e094f27372b353327a8febce41
d527c3b54c17fd6dd48efbc9a728bbdb9c60aade
F20110109_AABVCZ grieb_m_Page_221.tif
4b86ba19ce722da93affdc93e26d6a4b
696135727ce73a03986df52eec20d4aa95954d45
2106 F20110109_AABTOF grieb_m_Page_196.txt
51f30d9f74a85f274ffce7577b928864
2554f64d62ead11c5f9760388d3c59ef87a3faa1
110272 F20110109_AABUYK grieb_m_Page_185.jp2
ca4302bcce8a56bf361b78259a46a684
91421901a64b516dad308e2e6d7910b1f2475d5d
F20110109_AABTOG grieb_m_Page_198.tif
7af291627841c2076e82ceb82a8948e5
834ce314200ee1d7bb07501b3c8b66889b12ed76
26154 F20110109_AABULA grieb_m_Page_190.QC.jpg
932a2ec5d2996ce9ec50f5cdb3020f9c
ba2a81cb6f87a281dd6eac99c55df5335af1fcb0
113414 F20110109_AABUYL grieb_m_Page_189.jp2
7ff93e14ccb63b559cd5ef17617324b8
e9cb28dfb3ced38f66fb9857a2e95e88ff2cb8f0
59575 F20110109_AABTOH grieb_m_Page_067.pro
b26ee3ea252e38ab1f11b16bb5103f18
34b5e074c64b88bedf452b527feef8f7e16ad6da
F20110109_AABULB grieb_m_Page_051.tif
8ecd0fdf9a6bbc70720efc4f53c48dd4
5d4e6d5a0fd13393fa3f6a1dc3a387a6143180df
109821 F20110109_AABUYM grieb_m_Page_190.jp2
9dd96ef6be30ee065df02f5910e56c0e
4a9678bceea21eac57cd8d3a5438d1e270fa77c8
128114 F20110109_AABTOI grieb_m_Page_033.jp2
e67428728410e54af1da5396642a4ce4
5628d7d5bc1cbf7468c91c40462301dbff436ca9
2795 F20110109_AABULC grieb_m_Page_081.txt
942df61be9a67f6030da3549a83d657a
758cdf45d94272d671b0e5fc7e5587911914eeef
109636 F20110109_AABUYN grieb_m_Page_191.jp2
13bee45359653475206f0072d7240b82
1eb90a6b2a109ccb1a808d86035d3dd86912e21c
83878 F20110109_AABTOJ grieb_m_Page_076.jpg
560d373662022e43b2bba7a87db60667
ae7f4f776a6061df857b81cbe9b5704ba74ea56f
F20110109_AABULD grieb_m_Page_155.tif
42fd9d558dceb074e4ea1631d3f175cf
4c17c4e9214a013340db258c899ead16e9ea86b2
123368 F20110109_AABUYO grieb_m_Page_194.jp2
1f11972378b7db0f629611fa0e10258b
be04847d63bbb05460cd10149c0590448985a8b8
105575 F20110109_AABTOK grieb_m_Page_175.jp2
45180026cdf15a29b23e36b3668cedc4
706d567fee2b40aa41ee49e8c4258db09924e932
90447 F20110109_AABULE grieb_m_Page_174.jpg
d7ae220efe1c45d2dff562ea6290628d
13fe603cc3819acc6aa9d76243517c2b268ec461
111645 F20110109_AABUYP grieb_m_Page_196.jp2
a0f0e356aa26bf1c33d29b121db14d5c
1feac649ae95d048765bfe95463c34aebf810e66
108291 F20110109_AABULF grieb_m_Page_169.jp2
f173d612ad3c302f68a8a9040e57eca0
84f92582839ce0a0331463467954bc43006ccc2f
112636 F20110109_AABUYQ grieb_m_Page_198.jp2
c6cada86e99605259dcb2c2c537eb985
137e63b1ca251a2f6792e3d07a614b15d39785b8
2615 F20110109_AABTOL grieb_m_Page_038.txt
30984b8fd60f8428368c3a4bf502abc9
95555b84852988719cb7a1497af45f60cb4d2fc2
F20110109_AABULG grieb_m_Page_079.tif
e46438ed10135cace313592caf6abdbb
7a77f45ea16b2c46207b51a0d146e0a4ec060cf7
138896 F20110109_AABUYR grieb_m_Page_201.jp2
4be8b0484ff00cdd97f6ae44a0ce7c05
a794ebfe7641ed9c7a3393296b91180447d7f57b
25708 F20110109_AABTOM grieb_m_Page_149.QC.jpg
8a99c5bcefb91dd83bb7570696524d29
b102e173b505ee7528ebb9e5e049c6cc08856254
F20110109_AABVIA grieb_m_Page_071.txt
2f6acf1a4aa40d6c5a51e56c833afa0b
049f4c999291e8c6937dff5cfcf75eec8a15d029
129913 F20110109_AABUYS grieb_m_Page_204.jp2
c46d367057bca645f3dc258f0aa99d32
b0afc47fe8882d5a1bee08beae2db1df324eeff8
2304 F20110109_AABTON grieb_m_Page_023.txt
c98be51064311b843c3d28df819be767
87875235cc98b3c37f055bdecc2ce5cc0b2e75d1
42791 F20110109_AABULH grieb_m_Page_004.pro
497913baf83052511ba99d929b9f233f
40d4b0a5b46225751cb41c2651b123ffec709855
2343 F20110109_AABVIB grieb_m_Page_072.txt
8607f6d705b2482332cac26bc2c6b4e7
255e72a5f104816460e74ae42c650e9848752193
120656 F20110109_AABUYT grieb_m_Page_206.jp2
5ef56df2c86fdc900a8fcce99a7759d8
d4383b5c07209db7b68c126e84304afd6289c5d6
2314 F20110109_AABTOO grieb_m_Page_187.txt
0b923df29f8277ad0c7b9e8c5e59870e
39eab47fd78ef22e820fcc76344faff224769b99
F20110109_AABULI grieb_m_Page_110.tif
2eea3f7692bebd30dd88272983dc946c
afb2f3be648acd934ca4c1a1bf5f442dd08416e1
F20110109_AABVIC grieb_m_Page_073.txt
afa17021680c80dbe5292a5de5d585a1
743b0d79fa8468be619d94c77331261409d86abd
2454 F20110109_AABTOP grieb_m_Page_052.txt
3b1a312904036ef17616540af067f17d
8b4a5d9f519c11b4e10e4b7dd359a9719f8ed788
82148 F20110109_AABULJ grieb_m_Page_054.jpg
baeab7c75f5fedb09b50e80f293e6202
a09a7628358c9975d41c9f41572329537365e682
111716 F20110109_AABUYU grieb_m_Page_208.jp2
ed49ed7ff687c31224c2950415f0d4be
2cf68aeab47cd7b9903c61a37d84d2971a92dcb0
26791 F20110109_AABTOQ grieb_m_Page_197.QC.jpg
9577579ddaaa84a3a6275585f13bc1f4
34e41f1b703871e89a427252a5ac6f6713c42f85
25462 F20110109_AABULK grieb_m_Page_218.QC.jpg
f09aa34671a48c50128b7bd20d226c42
07a825514586e3fa29de19513f3bfb57e0533ead
F20110109_AABVID grieb_m_Page_075.txt
0b27608125245a5300715baf5e925d1a
7ae966650be5032bed4a80a186eda085e3b91d50
104769 F20110109_AABUYV grieb_m_Page_212.jp2
e5d064f0ac1e5e591a4a211104d4b190
f2af8cb1d39f63f1e9c636e704f960049b56d520
22462 F20110109_AABTOR grieb_m_Page_001.jp2
e4aaf635bc1efd0197b9415ea602f033
a6d61a0969007b3ed25a58210bf87e3f7cebdc99
25899 F20110109_AABULL grieb_m_Page_186.QC.jpg
25a60d1c80ec36884966ed8db708af05
aee5f45bdf40cf8c2da3da9d7bc944aeab99335a
2285 F20110109_AABVIE grieb_m_Page_079.txt
331ddeafe5c222618d376eba8ad630bf
48e43aaf28e8d380c7d4edcfe019311a3c981577
122680 F20110109_AABUYW grieb_m_Page_219.jp2
e7f0e478d4b149a20d1b1c26633a429c
61e1a6620e660e7a651685c0215c2581b5e5e55d
103761 F20110109_AABTOS grieb_m_Page_021.jp2
5375146121a49250cc8e188bf730a72e
ad0b22cc10322931c150e3abb640f24ee805b460
F20110109_AABULM grieb_m_Page_002.tif
279f184eca03047c1a24275b4d4fe0c6
9061ef4634883a89a04181f25f1b923831dbf1ef
F20110109_AABVIF grieb_m_Page_082.txt
200776a66f0c0a12b33710c669b99c34
59f84b9d68dbde19b90f9b14e8c9a3f4dda2105d
126413 F20110109_AABUYX grieb_m_Page_220.jp2
052eea03926447f6be17615872e33761
82f12eb5d65cdfd50cb2feb93072ee63cb22ea34
2801 F20110109_AABTOT grieb_m_Page_164.txt
4d12e6bbf8ec797d84bd7e64b9e821d5
0a6b2559e262ced97e12805e30487025992bbcf2
6184 F20110109_AABULN grieb_m_Page_113thm.jpg
c6936b2e1a392bc780ec9b25888159bd
d95e13b7f6f81de3aebe6f826f160f5316fcc6fd
1983 F20110109_AABVIG grieb_m_Page_085.txt
693945824c29151196e700fa18ebddfa
7bb8c86702daeaa162f02be4c525d8fc7ea2725e
131194 F20110109_AABUYY grieb_m_Page_221.jp2
77cc0621c16fb77ecd4d5ca15347c0ec
3e966c2542c0fb5f0a89cb92ff59ccae2b15b1ac
F20110109_AABTOU grieb_m_Page_145.tif
a61a559fdb761723d6c40581068415a2
06e066fccdfeca4462de4d30f4244bddffad31f8
84867 F20110109_AABULO grieb_m_Page_132.jpg
d194f7e504069541481b792aec6e6ee2
47b0749fa03790b4ce3f7329d34c496ee9d4db7b
2052 F20110109_AABVIH grieb_m_Page_090.txt
4537edf142938481236d0911451e8288
6214838d0bfb59e2bf0f95f687049a6cdd10fded
132963 F20110109_AABUYZ grieb_m_Page_222.jp2
85704ed2b1dbd16169896949244a7299
fffdeb09821afb4f0a489ffde7792daa58676b98
F20110109_AABTOV grieb_m_Page_170.tif
cdc96267e11bb6483de9b5b5c22994ee
f4c89892caf5c1e091d2a6df43e67d601ff6a378
F20110109_AABULP grieb_m_Page_204.txt
1d5a8346d856a6298e58019957be44a2
3087d853ab380a8cd644a665347fdfd09912c853
2042 F20110109_AABVII grieb_m_Page_094.txt
7db38e49f012b85a7f4a05020211fc90
343f3d5ae21646984f47ca66b4a725b2588ec0a4
58908 F20110109_AABTOW grieb_m_Page_034.pro
67e3c3f68c7f629daf6e70ce068ed97e
398ddb5be636a1dd770c7b8906979da1363a2715
2180 F20110109_AABULQ grieb_m_Page_097.txt
321403ad693c687ddf83cf9a43ed8442
b8d3e43b46ab2c8ef0a12b0cb69a0ca76cd39597
2158 F20110109_AABVIJ grieb_m_Page_095.txt
40d9f56da82ed0ba9ddb22f08b50b101
512aa705d7dfc32eee8ff89657d399bf64344336
F20110109_AABTOX grieb_m_Page_163.tif
cec9c40762a7cd917dd117f355c443dc
cca97f3fedbc7486435f3b80b4ed9838b27cdf8c
6453 F20110109_AABULR grieb_m_Page_176thm.jpg
d592b5dd84ab52171fd3262fe98a297d
86e1d44995bdc558bcd79e9319c0eb1b6dd47f54
3010 F20110109_AABVIK grieb_m_Page_099.txt
4b0b30e3be8b9aa9cbf2d5a279615955
ec8eb82ade1e9b689b88463f3aab174cff8b20e3
52882 F20110109_AABTOY grieb_m_Page_112.pro
acb3a7ea860ccbec95699f701dd87d2f
2099d5d47fd2b0e73610067c629cf5051224e6a3
6812 F20110109_AABULS grieb_m_Page_092thm.jpg
c4aaa5f490d0b5200ae90b41dc3e69a5
fef3e18a6339c9390c91a385b5091e47e8473000
1907 F20110109_AABVIL grieb_m_Page_100.txt
8a694ca0a01caa3e61c4e131fc19fc94
7b0b9d76113f5659cf9f3c470d1504dac753082f
51798 F20110109_AABTOZ grieb_m_Page_197.pro
16f4be1ca24c30c4ec85d93ce4193013
11b7d15770753f802dadc04860adc03d1b5c57b3
F20110109_AABULT grieb_m_Page_012.txt
eb252d5381a2e1b1ea439aa330064ee2
71814ab6ea9673f678a996bf81f428a918a41656
2065 F20110109_AABVIM grieb_m_Page_103.txt
b6f6c3a7d4d607b7c486776c6856def5
e2e27a51ff86b3e1bc5c78f49d2cc40c70bb6e24
F20110109_AABULU grieb_m_Page_100.tif
37b2ebdd545539a8b92922460d4b0cdf
49cbf32e238c5052d31685718c6cd2e2392bc0a1
2519 F20110109_AABVIN grieb_m_Page_104.txt
7b3a53ca6bfec40993ec33895c342989
34164d743484ba0fe53e8fdf957e8012bdbbfc89
112086 F20110109_AABULV grieb_m_Page_144.jp2
33018e4d80ff7d7afc3fd4614d5a6aae
4074d9116e215e25f452ffd4ba5bce9e4d280781
2059 F20110109_AABVIO grieb_m_Page_108.txt
485331d8de765d912900d474a97efcb7
423688556a1070408f7ed38be3540e96ee1bc767
28759 F20110109_AABULW grieb_m_Page_017.QC.jpg
cab12e79697be594d0fe1eee6aca62fd
3afa08fa9730aed85015a31289edb89fb41d1c8a
2020 F20110109_AABVIP grieb_m_Page_109.txt
319a5b6d2649167ba63eed24db3f538f
6b0c2f73cc0c85f8b655c7634b34c8c9e6a11340
2054 F20110109_AABULX grieb_m_Page_043.txt
2dca1c755b775d3cff331f330d544ec5
e1fe9a1c32553687940a41666809113512909767
2081 F20110109_AABVIQ grieb_m_Page_110.txt
84c205c80b53a0e50d2adc22ad09ce41
5a124fb38bba075a092454416f1af636cdc0dedb
27693 F20110109_AABULY grieb_m_Page_152.QC.jpg
dcdbe568e162032b0e072abe73734105
516b7c1fe401cc0ad51334e5fe2e16e6b3dfd229
2259 F20110109_AABVIR grieb_m_Page_111.txt
04ac6fff015804ed61845b7ec72ccead
8b1b4bcb92385c11b36ac9e58e03e25e3a35cd48
F20110109_AABULZ grieb_m_Page_041.QC.jpg
e240de9d9d023331df20d8d44235b193
a44387b3a7fdc806c9196e03792da18c959326d8
2036 F20110109_AABVIS grieb_m_Page_115.txt
2eb32826f6d6d3209f819c910b7610b4
259cd7e4ae41b6468eb14f9ad5fd49611ba91013
2063 F20110109_AABVIT grieb_m_Page_117.txt
0d4809852292d20ac4811f8d21549cf5
ad73d85d10bb42f7fc03a828be24030965d504f9
1999 F20110109_AABVIU grieb_m_Page_122.txt
3915e48b61c8623b1b0bda50c221ea8b
273fdbac26ce9f641596d9f5d26df72cda23bf7b
103676 F20110109_AABTUA grieb_m_Page_031.jpg
d391ddc4d1cc8f5ae186b427a69bc972
e28c944a1bf0c4fcf791acf209bfaad0ab1d2874
2012 F20110109_AABVIV grieb_m_Page_123.txt
e4e1f7d34f49e7a4f000db05fb64c05b
4e28d703ea55a895949ca19ebe354bc4aeda87a5
F20110109_AABTUB grieb_m_Page_120.tif
3cdab1e1b43d682f96c512b33735dae0
29dd327b9675ea4e64843bd16e989178b317e817
2201 F20110109_AABVIW grieb_m_Page_124.txt
198f1ad557851b773c44e60042098b25
e48ca91df066f026f9a88c2f453e1d5e4f14e88f
28252 F20110109_AABTUC grieb_m_Page_069.QC.jpg
8477ec8c1f2a7ea7410b7009a4437301
de381099e254364cc943a1a077ce7cec6a4d5127
1832 F20110109_AABVIX grieb_m_Page_127.txt
49a7a60cd13f848ef452cb8465596985
ef0de90b987ee0943b46cb8e3a52b7e08ce9b35e
2233 F20110109_AABTUD grieb_m_Page_145.txt
430f468076dbea1379776ea7289df76c
7e301868a5cdd72b08ea33e84185615168aa6fa4
2050 F20110109_AABVIY grieb_m_Page_128.txt
8d690cd5dfdf1a03d190b98dbf2204ef
e10a47bd47a565d5ab207dbe13da500ef1bcb748
86422 F20110109_AABTUE grieb_m_Page_205.jpg
f9e71abb3f768510398675635082f76f
179b4aa059cb2f9018ad89b31123e4da6ab7673b
2815 F20110109_AABVIZ grieb_m_Page_129.txt
b77cd551be6c2415989af0fe857d788e
2f5a44f93f8f141eace0e0ab5ed7d593109945bd
106943 F20110109_AABTUF grieb_m_Page_141.jpg
51d227467e9a14020852d2cb50e3dd38
8b33c1c944f819fe525c84ba73f9083e1ce1cc3f
549 F20110109_AABTUG grieb_m_Page_009.txt
11ea3ae29d04dac5a14e42d08cc13ed3
fa5f4af5d151f0e2e7768edb43bef59f21e6ee74
2277 F20110109_AABTUH grieb_m_Page_049.txt
81308eccf6a31e8da3dfc76950147610
a8313f2de3b69f44919c16114951f126fc960ca4
26449 F20110109_AABURA grieb_m_Page_160.QC.jpg
d39bac884823e971238b7c917f2d4d2f
de7b0cb05ce73f1f9b9a0f1d4ebfb3a3bcd6f80c
110760 F20110109_AABTUI grieb_m_Page_171.jp2
27c1b04799f2644253aa095cd92f0bde
0617097375ffefba4edbe0158f211b04080122f3
F20110109_AABURB grieb_m_Page_209.tif
2e241a08c33d444e07b1c6d45b245567
4af68e243524170581f92212d69f0d712fe1fad2
53265 F20110109_AABTUJ grieb_m_Page_110.pro
0dddadca7a75f45aa17311dfb09bba1a
33e004888df1d136f4c8320d3caab6243ca44d6a
22707 F20110109_AABURC grieb_m_Page_004.QC.jpg
5d65e6c92c600f072b2e25a8c392eeeb
f0f090a71bc156e893e48f967b291a5e4de7b1bc
81270 F20110109_AABTUK grieb_m_Page_015.jpg
1fd3238bb9066605eeb22777224d3a87
866de3c306c2ec92fb5f36475f57fc12148f93d5
3206 F20110109_AABURD grieb_m_Page_006.txt
468c254e2332ba3139ced44b9e26bf67
979b1d1050cc9f48bb90e631517a0e1a332218a2
6487 F20110109_AABTUL grieb_m_Page_011thm.jpg
568cf333efceb1a0060ad1ad1c3be415
c40a7ec1215c92f69ef524f03e3353d0a6ce22a2
F20110109_AABURE grieb_m_Page_146.tif
9e591f37408653050588b3ae18b9e25c
4ee6b931eea630c8f0243cbc0b2711a388e61a35
2038 F20110109_AABTUM grieb_m_Page_178.txt
17c1d8d223cd718270db8ea951c2333c
8a5c94dbe4f3fe504857cb3c9f03d8de5b1b6d62
62145 F20110109_AABURF grieb_m_Page_106.pro
c630d423eb2270cffb798f4083dee69e
cc6748e1ade9957d223941372d1a01d8acf3be88
85697 F20110109_AABTUN grieb_m_Page_094.jpg
8510d21b3c74eb1a3d8acd24f88da821
23320be5f7d2a3c4d262d67c4331ce91f9e03c73
6086 F20110109_AABURG grieb_m_Page_066thm.jpg
5ced5e780e32ae8ec2eec55540fa467b
6e298039da7c2b59dbe395fef0661354a4f07c4e
F20110109_AABVOA grieb_m_Page_084.QC.jpg
0caa348fdf9a3853af2ffd699e605acc
6c11fe4fc88fa0c18c68354843bc832b446d37e0
F20110109_AABTUO grieb_m_Page_150.tif
43edc78a9ec401ee0eb27e8afab8912e
010e12d1b883ee78ef6254b0d9f07afff581ad76
6048 F20110109_AABURH grieb_m_Page_150thm.jpg
d0267aef54aa6f77c3d5031cc393646f
903ce371f87d9a0d0f45b784816a967334a48b31
6513 F20110109_AABVOB grieb_m_Page_084thm.jpg
3b6ebfbc001542b2e854a2971aa8c9bf
17dac4b123e067840950b13cefb6ab7953fa4f86
F20110109_AABTUP grieb_m_Page_200.tif
3490f7d16715ab99325f590063d12027
749591ecfd60902c506c034d2fe368bc7997a6a5
348 F20110109_AABURI grieb_m_Page_003thm.jpg
43d600c179b3bb57a23ed60aa900de0e
97bc8750a8765f52abfeff0e2726955a756cd4f5
25679 F20110109_AABVOC grieb_m_Page_085.QC.jpg
ee511ba36fa97eda91dc1a03f7cd80dd
1a015e4a01973a8843056729dfb93d1c3b562e8f
102569 F20110109_AABTUQ grieb_m_Page_017.jpg
95d73a0c1874832995c245c37fe83eaf
b539d0238d727255e8490222529bdfc6d0035d55
F20110109_AABURJ grieb_m_Page_102.tif
0c8be66965882728c0871be31397d919
d6c1a568d2a2aee94379bb85ad5bb1c5cc075c5a
27954 F20110109_AABVOD grieb_m_Page_088.QC.jpg
8afb8c88f6e26d46b877da18689069bc
3962e533094175b3b85bc013900155adbee04f1e
121526 F20110109_AABURK grieb_m_Page_148.jp2
8699b48010ed60cc450b966997e74422
f106652c797aad612df42b0a52dfbf335f15dfb6
F20110109_AABVOE grieb_m_Page_088thm.jpg
020ba869bfaa66fda38b207b17c94edc
c3ee5dc0a4b619671f59e6fc7ee2a2e34f820080
6312 F20110109_AABTUR grieb_m_Page_210thm.jpg
063db15a871c74f0f886c2eef1868afe
226f7a4e62bf824eae7be98b45dedd4341f00178
6148 F20110109_AABURL grieb_m_Page_132thm.jpg
57253ffeca70752770ab93e5ea409568
c91ed91a6d9762cd7e85e42319acc9d5e4ae540b
26772 F20110109_AABVOF grieb_m_Page_089.QC.jpg
76e698112bc04b85c5d29adf0b1d5e23
df9c5d83c6861fc5b8d23795a1e5fd8b2d4fa981
25543 F20110109_AABUEA grieb_m_Page_180.QC.jpg
266ba22e927dac314d783f5f2cf6e4e4
99d9d76741e2c1b1c4de35b3ab58b2c9e4c7f2e6
6363 F20110109_AABTUS grieb_m_Page_090thm.jpg
1905451512c1ecbce6f9aaa45ec10a29
87a93e1eac8edade96fd86f90ece31a55618c10f
2425 F20110109_AABURM grieb_m_Page_048.txt
90f390cd61d6ba2a071dcc72af7e5f83
6e25910942ce11a7d7a7b3aeac6d89d40cedd3fd
F20110109_AABVOG grieb_m_Page_090.QC.jpg
23d1cb547785d7e9a63cdc58418ca657
e943e40e5ee82e077a5e1513f03a30b91be397b7
100 F20110109_AABUEB grieb_m_Page_005.txt
a6c80f9afb254cade42d5f2fafe63f3c
05658aaeccb2af7c8f0d138c791162ca90768cc4
59231 F20110109_AABTUT grieb_m_Page_221.pro
65b30926668f6a7c9b7f1b64db854ebf
077f370340968a01d7ea30e416b507d5b370e2e6
6460 F20110109_AABVOH grieb_m_Page_091thm.jpg
447656f8d95b66c52063559a49198137
7087cbe9125758c67b981e036062f974f4fbda8a
F20110109_AABUEC grieb_m_Page_157.pro
ac63843e173235281cdcfda1eb1a3605
b1538d7c814df39ded99bf4c8840dbf4c6dbcb42
5853 F20110109_AABTUU grieb_m_Page_087thm.jpg
e0d88cd0683cc48ed63dc96b03a2feba
a26aadc4f20c7662d7e6fb2bfc9152cc9f9ad388
108583 F20110109_AABURN grieb_m_Page_012.jp2
52a1466af6063959a477cdf57e9f6cf1
cb046a0908bbfbdf442d9dd0893b3fed36468a4d
29839 F20110109_AABVOI grieb_m_Page_092.QC.jpg
247af3bd2e73567d14a08a4193d0adb2
124717ca054e223a0c4e939dc1ba2547ff533ca4
6604 F20110109_AABUED grieb_m_Page_079thm.jpg
91ef11000d7ce61b5223f32283d3de73
d0473390b4ca1fedce0ea5aba652ec6804854f0a
F20110109_AABTUV grieb_m_Page_126thm.jpg
865247e91307ffe1e097b110434e5807
6a363066fe713d25ecfd204b35469835c7ae3ca8
332866 F20110109_AABURO UFE0000690_00001.xml
70aa14f8aff7e340a2d2ae9c862f5e6c
6800c680f7f5609b107f2809b31b1a370e29104f
25525 F20110109_AABUEE grieb_m_Page_132.QC.jpg
e2a4a295e6e09e4402af62708a86a8cf
75d8368466f37b028496de1e9635405235a127a2
27312 F20110109_AABTUW grieb_m_Page_106.QC.jpg
28d7b436fe78b64d12ca2b91c4b1d95e
f230fcd5305f406c9397376d010d368f4778e448
29170 F20110109_AABVOJ grieb_m_Page_093.QC.jpg
de853c73e476e8720e7c1e432fe38baa
4685678d80da9304d18a9deba04e3202e4052645
F20110109_AABUEF grieb_m_Page_042.tif
c9e75e13e463daf7e5a5d94be7e1bc8c
44dcfde1223fe9461645810de68531dd0eb68d98
114225 F20110109_AABTUX grieb_m_Page_060.jp2
47d446adc60acd9788a3e4a6864eefcd
072d39543cc5791e0e926a0b44350a30e961c0cd
6491 F20110109_AABVOK grieb_m_Page_094thm.jpg
7a3da54523588342a1c62a49945dba9b
d622b35144a79c927e77d289cdded3d704e5563e
54556 F20110109_AABUEG grieb_m_Page_097.pro
5973c32511acc19f0cb30867e28b2704
03372ff85abf7725fb502c666a4da2f392084b11
F20110109_AABTUY grieb_m_Page_129thm.jpg
ea4f0cb31a3f9dd84b335740f9261f91
e7829cc9113b30e523a4deb3886c0082fe4907c0
6554 F20110109_AABURR grieb_m_Page_005.jpg
f563be46e996c38070ff1007a5df0cbf
dddf5c7e349a2d6be542b5fd282b77b31a6788cf
27810 F20110109_AABVOL grieb_m_Page_098.QC.jpg
7caf418ab6c9ef0bdd92c95abc0457ec
c81234bda7f4f556dc2bcea0abccfd2b4b566f2d
64389 F20110109_AABUEH grieb_m_Page_160.pro
7674eebc294aa8f4e308d475f202b123
e39caadc0894e3ec2fcadb10c014e72706b2ad29
F20110109_AABTUZ grieb_m_Page_105.tif
90e75e5661410afc65b804b9f841ee58
6301fd4b0d5e93b7c9f6cfff5d11f1d6b3847a9f
F20110109_AABVBA grieb_m_Page_109.tif
81d26c8cd2eca1555a8e2241d9ab90be
086c2145738373d26e8a3984e5a3b3e03f4e6a24
77035 F20110109_AABURS grieb_m_Page_006.jpg
785b1972ee97f805026444b30344f5c8
1275c53364b3317c966fdbd4025fd3c2df0c2e9c
6643 F20110109_AABVOM grieb_m_Page_101thm.jpg
981a412faf86d6c33b75dc35a7bf627d
30856ca3b6a9324ff6a0cd55f1a9c8c85e9d8e4b
6790 F20110109_AABUEI grieb_m_Page_203thm.jpg
7971082aa733d12d1305bd75abc126da
2cfd812cf57be56a248b5c6f872fb34fe48158c1
F20110109_AABVBB grieb_m_Page_114.tif
d3e5458159866de840edf1cd4b778265
c82db8c381287bf426aaab51f13fd6554b5bb1ac
26588 F20110109_AABURT grieb_m_Page_009.jpg
219063d536e8148c049d07fb75680dd5
51ea11765d004b35893206bc5afc08760e557dfb
27742 F20110109_AABVON grieb_m_Page_102.QC.jpg
7a99b28f8168bf50ef960480d0109057
721677abd8d97555c4924584489e0b2a39b486d5
52255 F20110109_AABUEJ grieb_m_Page_211.pro
6a84a38a6718cb67f22794cb3ab82b56
d147d4de175766e2299061c45310a7e587d05111
F20110109_AABVBC grieb_m_Page_116.tif
0d26d1bb5befa422f920b8f740ce2cd3
61546de3966511091c49e296fcb0ebc1f8b3b874
82227 F20110109_AABURU grieb_m_Page_012.jpg
d4d0bdfa8992b954b4531fdf5cbbb284
f9ec1ec9136573ad9a8e352506aa4d404eb0d468
24443 F20110109_AABVOO grieb_m_Page_103.QC.jpg
5a9726e5522d6213c5e46954b9043a95
95e879538aafe3d47d66b7cc8d3384ccc4d50feb
5794 F20110109_AABUEK grieb_m_Page_214thm.jpg
f18e1565eda67fff9aaa5a5181fad151
a1e03c7638ca98fdad471facc5114f13738921bd
F20110109_AABVBD grieb_m_Page_125.tif
fffbc0f429539bb1793de4479dac4e05
e4e246c750244b1dfd8e42c370b2fcf51262bffc
77108 F20110109_AABURV grieb_m_Page_016.jpg
48a8233e6b8f02e4a3d86010bfd31e21
222619a26aa02d09df04a1edf4d15f0e32591521
6161 F20110109_AABVOP grieb_m_Page_103thm.jpg
c5e5c99d928ef5f264e68af3b08b8ca5
4b3c23b6d04ce09701944892cb35731cfecae2c7
F20110109_AABUEL grieb_m_Page_025thm.jpg
58e19cce677992cde02876c853d386cd
6aab546c3f18e9982b8bc20e88096db1ca0085de
F20110109_AABVBE grieb_m_Page_126.tif
70f832949a26d84968945df5b9654eff
177c5af614510fca1e7d2915c1ad794ff546d9f7
82526 F20110109_AABURW grieb_m_Page_018.jpg
832247d44c5b9d60652a497ab2d48557
e60a2c653ab3cafbfc804056a46dce37c7088490
25131 F20110109_AABVOQ grieb_m_Page_105.QC.jpg
cf4c3a35fd3a2771821b079d7816ec69
6ac47227ce345979a07bfeb4253297105760f0d2
6441 F20110109_AABUEM grieb_m_Page_208thm.jpg
d91b54b678021077fdbf65dfef340a77
732905baa8bd1c1414ab7cd2520a81e2ccc6d4d9
F20110109_AABVBF grieb_m_Page_127.tif
a748bad700556a6ea36655ef9ea9db72
1b5b8ffaba3380cd38f0eed258a63be9da539031
83031 F20110109_AABURX grieb_m_Page_019.jpg
5ebad8c76af3dfd3e0c2a387bacdf806
2a5a34d3633a7e69b7bfc98afea6eb7ad78da4c5
6057 F20110109_AABVOR grieb_m_Page_105thm.jpg
864e5045f9fd61c591c113a36e11aaf9
053ced5c308208902730a421f6c09bd4afc56d4b
1932 F20110109_AABUEN grieb_m_Page_105.txt
f6a64e1ac6fef697e788b2cee053e78a
2ac98c9f359948ffb5c158d13d6fb36c84882123
F20110109_AABVBG grieb_m_Page_128.tif
5763677e014d2cd978604a524f5526c6
8520112b334f9546fd5dfd220b6659c32a96aba0
79555 F20110109_AABURY grieb_m_Page_020.jpg
c48b836499141d3c149d4f029b342959
3b468cca388237232283188827d4e108ec1c080d
26273 F20110109_AABVOS grieb_m_Page_107.QC.jpg
b4900fe3bdd1ae9fa74a402f6688ce94
6469ed9ee084956e3bb0af8b5bfc891c546f564b
24780 F20110109_AABUEO grieb_m_Page_032.QC.jpg
8b7f6b4815626c3280970b5737cddd02
73caf29e078c2dd9d54bd3cc02706a5d2e55d526
F20110109_AABVBH grieb_m_Page_129.tif
e8ad761da7626bfd61a6a1de957dc3a6
278d99d79f650f664df1dbf86cc51ff36478dce7
78478 F20110109_AABURZ grieb_m_Page_021.jpg
ae4e984e7c01db81423eb0e31f9c408f
fe4a090f313786f3d5d9d2eb85abd320c40a0951
6340 F20110109_AABVOT grieb_m_Page_107thm.jpg
1a62f070177073dd296708b0af0614f6
b714645673db094b5f17751e5ec2f151ad62899f
26586 F20110109_AABUEP grieb_m_Page_142.QC.jpg
dfa002e7d69007d104afbee5501df415
05e92087551cd9276d1e67de1811c9529376ab52
F20110109_AABVBI grieb_m_Page_130.tif
5b55fb1af169f63b12b13f1cee38e907
2e152cfa2ba10c81ae14360ca88c87d144040c33
6493 F20110109_AABVOU grieb_m_Page_108thm.jpg
4d0c608ce714aeb94d34982b0a1204c2
02b993f80f92d3e8b4a237b4e86206f122ddef1a
127524 F20110109_AABUEQ grieb_m_Page_037.jp2
a367c5179905734f1ae9a32748494fbe
1c8b50d3909d26d2336421e6c0ec8e5395928702
F20110109_AABVBJ grieb_m_Page_131.tif
b3a1ff2cb666a73ea26854950ea1e9d6
461edc1c8597e1351531c0fd6d2bf6d9147978cb
27466 F20110109_AABVOV grieb_m_Page_110.QC.jpg
37800745f26e9caa78866d7751d95acb
05440e145eafe0ab2f28736fcf4b95111050fcd9
26170 F20110109_AABUER grieb_m_Page_072.QC.jpg
abae3a23b2f779fde011ddf5b178d530
f8d670bad2d3a65f87ad6297a3693fc1c32ad396
F20110109_AABVBK grieb_m_Page_132.tif
01893a9bd55e28855af8c18fa0839966
83ddabb520a9114b161bba999e12b4c2d5b8b87a
6570 F20110109_AABVOW grieb_m_Page_110thm.jpg
d297b9f05037fa0619a574066bdf0d53
38ea405a61e4f60cef50f0a3558f03e1fcaf3651
77898 F20110109_AABUES grieb_m_Page_161.jpg
3104f6d42882a030d570fb40093e6090
7ed37c5d1a3a0331ea3ad68fc1c87854ae7b8679
F20110109_AABVBL grieb_m_Page_135.tif
b5570099715cb4c6c83cd8fe70dc7b81
4cf9e631741c85349a27a6579dfbffb96ac67396
F20110109_AABVOX grieb_m_Page_112thm.jpg
4806b88fbe34fd5b609419347cf94b5b
3de5e36c09d134468682a46b2048d7078f0bf643
55462 F20110109_AABUET grieb_m_Page_144.pro
d86171e2f38d9dd82df045945592fd85
40709a6d98e0e256ce9dc94c6f2619a389a6214e
F20110109_AABVBM grieb_m_Page_136.tif
aba8d0168a1809380616b88b0932b5c4
9defc472cd5f9686c1c33780f7fdd3d7c89a882e
24993 F20110109_AABVOY grieb_m_Page_113.QC.jpg
174192f919e8a8f8a10dec9e9fa5b751
4eaa3b2fd1dd7dadad7e3819e86c5e21a965cfe4
73481 F20110109_AABUEU grieb_m_Page_204.pro
c57d5f7ad3e4419476ac31209756b16e
0beef56c50dee70f6897fe013fd2170bf3824d7c
F20110109_AABVBN grieb_m_Page_137.tif
b51b4145e3e27cc608e9df3756d7e079
ea7bdf95769c7e9395bf09be172d42c76ec20c6b
26979 F20110109_AABVOZ grieb_m_Page_117.QC.jpg
291db16679f665286c61231069de1043
5498b841ef2f28f46ea58672c65e3830f5314338
2381 F20110109_AABUEV grieb_m_Page_216.txt
42d59867514f99c351fc2bc7c5d61d74
e57867393ee4889204d50dd7714b95f049f0890a
F20110109_AABVBO grieb_m_Page_142.tif
c3b33ba92f8905bd26fbccb66c8c537f
f6ee0d58840def696902fb224f837aa260cddcb4
6262 F20110109_AABUEW grieb_m_Page_085thm.jpg
1f8694d73dc4f8c8b2ef3c603dcad8de
c7369369963f87285bc7159ec93b727c87c4c2ad
F20110109_AABVBP grieb_m_Page_148.tif
49fb803f2b1ba52b266d6429a4df9aa3
133296ee3531fa5d8a96b27c53b6b82818b89751
102874 F20110109_AABUEX grieb_m_Page_118.jp2
b3619d8e11f613f17a4dff288b5a1842
b9f6b80345d1e1477a4259d9da764161063669a2
127016 F20110109_AABUXA grieb_m_Page_104.jp2
b4b4ecbbee7ee96b5b684b36808373db
5a7c966955fb496cefbda9ef9f92d48e3234a1f0
F20110109_AABVBQ grieb_m_Page_149.tif
69a8d0b76e49dfe732fbfe729f78e49f
85eede407dbcc5f520e885c4dbc1a3b0b97b877a
F20110109_AABUEY grieb_m_Page_106.tif
5b4a9286e5df2fddcf5cc182610e13b8
93bc6e20d77b588d233a69eaf2c4ebb32621b8eb
107235 F20110109_AABUXB grieb_m_Page_105.jp2
00314bb7e9b94399aa429e2204109dbe
528bb3a9f26ea8161e2aee0a6852f35ad43cac60
F20110109_AABVBR grieb_m_Page_153.tif
0db507cfbb448afe6ae9fb4c4709be68
bbc782f9ab4e23e8e4bbfc8d81f7985082100d68
F20110109_AABUEZ grieb_m_Page_174thm.jpg
9fe317ed3e1c3f7a569026532f86a2a4
1ef554d9a9233a0f720ff6380d26cd0c9c96ae03
111471 F20110109_AABUXC grieb_m_Page_107.jp2
15ee49f84e6d153ced02816a73024e7b
635d1b4764bd5b8fe919ad0825635dfec8dfd5e5
F20110109_AABVBS grieb_m_Page_154.tif
9b9632a7c4de31abb03be63d696238d4
7a1f235782331e30f41a2cd2284c5fd08b0c08fc
112692 F20110109_AABUXD grieb_m_Page_108.jp2
5f47b9e8051386667d873fcfcc1220c5
b534ea6b13aa8af92167d0bf7ce83f41b11cf6ae
F20110109_AABVBT grieb_m_Page_157.tif
396326f82fe041eddbb5a921557a4850
34e26271258d7bd4250af0365e3b181706a45200
118035 F20110109_AABUXE grieb_m_Page_111.jp2
4bab62ebc07aa22a3753f6a1b0e35a71
ed863e70cf5206292c6415ea746ff1070903f066
F20110109_AABVBU grieb_m_Page_159.tif
6e5565f495e9475fbf9b59c5186fa3ee
f1f40bc2217a9a79ddb0de9880dfb602a1a7b132
88058 F20110109_AABTNA grieb_m_Page_189.jpg
864530cce15ab99779ae39a8208ae6e5
5c17af344e9a8f84dd985838ac5b664278060dfb
113228 F20110109_AABUXF grieb_m_Page_112.jp2
29000523c1d6372f0242d6bb1174a348
dc52f204d971a03e1a068a350def2018bdd62efd
F20110109_AABVBV grieb_m_Page_162.tif
ee68936e88d2f04e9e2c729a3d0f8b08
303a3d9623d3331bfd24515ccb13ade62f9e890a
F20110109_AABTNB grieb_m_Page_208.tif
6d96426e9d7c4685d45c45578051ec29
c3cf719bfaf1c801abeb38a67ac1b91639dc2fee
120127 F20110109_AABUXG grieb_m_Page_114.jp2
5af880f51e8b02bd355674e95d887c5e
c1e042145926949e70d1e075f89a9e82559e8113
F20110109_AABVBW grieb_m_Page_164.tif
a895547a4f78dccdea37a83539a25e95
ce0771321ff8be3f87b290ad9a0a60a206528908
F20110109_AABTNC grieb_m_Page_066.txt
24be84d19417e2def50685f5b2eab736
033295df3967f5d18c215ab432deb6edb8a64659
127086 F20110109_AABUXH grieb_m_Page_119.jp2
40f4c87b2de8629b440390323e924023
101010bae160cbf1db97ddfeb7603fa4d249a4f1
F20110109_AABVBX grieb_m_Page_165.tif
f8d764f39770bf13b628042b9a123bbf
aa13b9a4f3a4a680c30ca64ef06817306edeb214
53325 F20110109_AABTND grieb_m_Page_198.pro
7b21dbc13613bd3d8bf4d0d424091b5a
b418e136875e7b7799f18471ff9f041ba09954f2
111893 F20110109_AABUXI grieb_m_Page_120.jp2
f73d1b7a9e2a334f0a8dda0e0dd97c1c
d8b485551e3d57cc4ac7400b2032ed1081d22067
F20110109_AABVBY grieb_m_Page_167.tif
41258454827e39893dfa9ed910700d95
7306be196bf71ce84447fe8616f820a80bf8429d
50200 F20110109_AABTNE grieb_m_Page_180.pro
a0a9f4deed280cbffb9c5330232a1dfc
a1cfcd5dae5841c64b6348cd601852cd747e5ac1
108956 F20110109_AABUXJ grieb_m_Page_121.jp2
f13a34f1de61d1ae63e190c7180dc28f
bf156f7fdf0899848346233b9a4d89d1ca076b64
F20110109_AABVBZ grieb_m_Page_168.tif
563c81ba016bb283ac011cb452f001f4
da2aee387cb4a518fb7fe48173b451a84990a0df
6343 F20110109_AABTNF grieb_m_Page_076thm.jpg
ea71882d43b201240dbadb83f17cc2ba
410316049fce9d0e8652dfd8942975024a3dc1e3
122967 F20110109_AABUXK grieb_m_Page_125.jp2
ad18cc794aeef0de69a232ea91701ba8
0280b03d23d738a19404cb157e8419e2e402f68b
86302 F20110109_AABTNG grieb_m_Page_224.jp2
df822ea032f58d2ce36688716eec3677
58f703e989002ec6d0b1bdbb3d695ab6454a9eed
2577 F20110109_AABUKA grieb_m_Page_051.txt
60e297fc5832745342d083cb7fc8a9bf
850f07b559375267788b9a4ee3566c5012e8160b
115785 F20110109_AABUXL grieb_m_Page_126.jp2
2fdfa4c08518ecd7946b22ba588935f6
4c2a3d139491ce461411373b3a11b41568de2169
129168 F20110109_AABTNH grieb_m_Page_051.jp2
71bad7ed53fe0eeb409b20aa3bf25602
1e7ea59b133008d7ab04ff661f30201119d3d29d
116075 F20110109_AABUKB grieb_m_Page_143.jp2
e8d7bd5a8a4981705a9372975d3b7088
27b3bb6809daa7043420cc084696ad79360cffb7
135979 F20110109_AABUXM grieb_m_Page_129.jp2
937a0b94d68de2c6a5bfcaa3b3c10238
9f7626613677da51b07fa4a5f11d2db5393b4d05
24552 F20110109_AABTNI grieb_m_Page_020.QC.jpg
49bcce8ccd9035a8c44292dbcb3fe72f
c2e480b184e8dae9a1d61d7e7f6c548c876f1c70
6091 F20110109_AABUKC grieb_m_Page_020thm.jpg
d5c99c468c0a92e772c5cca98655846a
cd0c7c097486b45d5926889ae87c912be3f44128
128655 F20110109_AABUXN grieb_m_Page_133.jp2
6e3a0f8b71edc1a7744db77d4b401561
824fdbb7e2bab87686cbc72923a582cfa51e9d83
46902 F20110109_AABTNJ grieb_m_Page_128.pro
ca48161c880ecf3d2f445e045ad55a43
7b8d47099066a9a78fc4ab57d667b0d9da566507
F20110109_AABUKD grieb_m_Page_209.txt
4b608db73d8e00273f57ec1a34cd0f41
a335b4c6de4327f7513ae02830b25ffef849e386
112665 F20110109_AABUXO grieb_m_Page_134.jp2
ad57ab7cea625019cacd64186f775cb2
e5f3a1690cd2a67e80c5f6b01611c78eb0f2689b
81787 F20110109_AABUKE grieb_m_Page_103.jpg
c2dd84473adcd6f2e0b73d526863d8e5
1c4c7f879e17c83cbe41ef73fae9524069638812
111407 F20110109_AABUXP grieb_m_Page_135.jp2
ed575a0f2090d8de3e2804ff01372c00
917d6f16989b4f123b94535f679e30a61da85b81
64222 F20110109_AABTNK grieb_m_Page_148.pro
5b35cf2f52b22b131667bb41e67d9128
20971ccb23064f4dd02a93571c8c09a094b75c11
115091 F20110109_AABUKF grieb_m_Page_091.jp2
c15a214fbbceedc42093a32bbc8796f7
d26081f085314a7ab18dadb6d505f6a32c9fa200
110829 F20110109_AABUXQ grieb_m_Page_136.jp2
a535d69dce5302e48616b6be35a9edfe
f3b0c1e9c1ba72bc9d6371403ccd25cc6c8d39d4
103039 F20110109_AABTNL grieb_m_Page_038.jpg
6c27b898194b67ef8a612a17931b3a70
f75ffcd39cd933f2bc9cd847a0a7fabd8491449b
113801 F20110109_AABUXR grieb_m_Page_137.jp2
7f1ee8bd78759e5b4ebab9544ef0d521
ae246067666ec2ab5ab2c9137ca3b9a44351a0a8
2082 F20110109_AABTNM grieb_m_Page_028.txt
e8cad148d3938fb782f641926c3c4bb6
e00dc69b6d2ecdc25e925875bfd7fd45930d0295
109431 F20110109_AABUKG grieb_m_Page_178.jp2
b153b184685bccde5514dae628a1fe45
e4e2e205270a4dad79733ec2a438425ac4e51858
1883 F20110109_AABVHA grieb_m_Page_016.txt
59537ec9cc2eea82902fed59e53d1a18
8feb8b6ba8a2134110b6ac387fa8841b8db92bdc
113667 F20110109_AABUXS grieb_m_Page_139.jp2
085d1acd50957b7faf9a31b28c12fa50
f2576b95e833b6695359316ce6bcac1e6aa2e215
F20110109_AABTNN grieb_m_Page_183.tif
3f7e03dbb6e97a42f29ea8ccffa06c1e
ce41019b0d697f4ccb40fa0647c77f22c143ba5f
73013 F20110109_AABUKH grieb_m_Page_128.jpg
2949905b8f652b212e79dc71fa961bc5
dbb1d24679bbe6633e825234292899b0d1810afe
2930 F20110109_AABVHB grieb_m_Page_017.txt
a638b5e39a43032250cb12f473c4fa4d
1e5c59a537c3451a9b5bac082bb3058492066716
6376 F20110109_AABTNO grieb_m_Page_106thm.jpg
3dd9f98c3f747b6b62247df1efbda4a9
27a1305f78dee4b64e5e779b434bc1679854ea44
66746 F20110109_AABUKI grieb_m_Page_133.pro
4a0003da190d1480f6e094e7303bf730
742df6828157bbbc85671e30efc78a3aa5c334d2
118411 F20110109_AABUXT grieb_m_Page_147.jp2
4995f69bbc77fb9678ab98b2eaaa6347
e5ed3497132dc79dedc8b291e78d487077426377
5450 F20110109_AABTNP grieb_m_Page_004thm.jpg
0278ef149dc46c802ace3998ddb89915
ee9323ecde985ff4952864c50330cdc475e82dea
51988 F20110109_AABUKJ grieb_m_Page_210.pro
833a7ca4c77917818bc4d15e7d65ab4b
ac6b9ebe3e1675f1a460f3ccdf00c4771348d2c9
1994 F20110109_AABVHC grieb_m_Page_019.txt
4ff1da8e9adfb763120f41af163f5130
680a067f87b4b1a17621046ad41a9d014a094a8d
141367 F20110109_AABUXU grieb_m_Page_151.jp2
a9ddf06999f450c3db87278df716a857
c9a824e6833fd2223c48a675d47e97cdd7969209
F20110109_AABTNQ grieb_m_Page_174.tif
7bca0e1fa0dcd9a554a139b74ff302a0
6564467f9882b8b85ffe3e03fe1f836820cbe345
6301 F20110109_AABUKK grieb_m_Page_018thm.jpg
fed52565201cd53509c196eeac6d518a
cab409f6694b88eecf3358713cc1b2a05e386de5
1866 F20110109_AABVHD grieb_m_Page_021.txt
0bb0fc486363c9c72b010b690f9d8489
d5b9cdb1c154993c285e0b22d3fdc02d50d0fa5d
119951 F20110109_AABUXV grieb_m_Page_152.jp2
ea28976e7f19dc7d4b29808d7e0cb900
32b917ae3a9cf6327f2dfbddc5bfd611678eb199
F20110109_AABTNR grieb_m_Page_108.tif
15b94cfd5a860dd012b92169a2119fc1
26870eb8b4af22733cedccbda4ab7b616567d468
37357 F20110109_AABUKL grieb_m_Page_224.pro
0715b804fd5bf943e7b85a0109df0e39
53dd8bdf53100e4c2b4897c00b0b52f16805efb7
2978 F20110109_AABVHE grieb_m_Page_022.txt
45e2707bdc36a048de2cca570d3f2435
8941419929c95a47719a34310da875254479ffc5
107359 F20110109_AABUXW grieb_m_Page_154.jp2
03269663e517f1abf9548dc68c12665b
eefcba6bc5e7af70e2b96e3f8d886209009711b1
55024 F20110109_AABTNS grieb_m_Page_149.pro
510818aef55aa00a0dc40944ff4e3cd4
04c7850a166d490ad506144eda8d120615bbfe5b
84758 F20110109_AABUKM grieb_m_Page_120.jpg
9c1a0f6dae753c7f173d2f32acbe3896
0aba82dc3e890573587ecd98a3fe5ad1171881a2
2095 F20110109_AABVHF grieb_m_Page_026.txt
9d92923a32f41c0d92e2b27c0166fc4d
b06ad72a7da4f295e3af70de770475f71e5a28e4
116745 F20110109_AABUXX grieb_m_Page_155.jp2
483af2caa0beb2251230b1498b5be372
2d02bf2501e0f9702b9ce3101d16c3feb9ac8414
92640 F20110109_AABTNT grieb_m_Page_157.jpg
885125f1c6682a46f6ed7b4663a7028c
48955d578aaf322c47fd2af37c9cf71d0f7cd330
105852 F20110109_AABUKN grieb_m_Page_209.jp2
a05c159d6dd9ac60b918decaa3285a31
b3b87e4f68cd9d9a9d02adee39f608a5b871db0e
2847 F20110109_AABVHG grieb_m_Page_027.txt
3332d06548b8b1819c8fed5209a5165b
864cdfde43b060ea8124de018473dc43ef4090f2
122394 F20110109_AABUXY grieb_m_Page_156.jp2
77a0f0db0c1d134eaccba7d2cdf04a73
d7e859c7bbefb8de26d97be5531d6f844b780647
88911 F20110109_AABTNU grieb_m_Page_124.jpg
94afb6b6a440cfd24a7e0501cc8bbd57
e1cf063d34ab4cc49460b77d1d36824e55cfb608
F20110109_AABUKO grieb_m_Page_062.tif
bf6af6cf2adec639ac575e660b414987
1720183cdca20eed7375b84b54f56a7e9a76ba5d
F20110109_AABVHH grieb_m_Page_030.txt
30eb03c912d355148eb4f9c29af3454f
42c18202fb91f4450f21a0781a1773047c11afff
124117 F20110109_AABUXZ grieb_m_Page_157.jp2
904a50cf2e1915451c98e757d76e45ca
785a256cf0feaf1d40ee0a4daa16432a23aa8c70
F20110109_AABTNV grieb_m_Page_122.tif
a2a5e925b000d92bf3ee891bdcfbc58a
45e6085e850369b72a8bf02db9573d86d3035a1a
60804 F20110109_AABUKP grieb_m_Page_072.pro
ca3e71f54ce06d3fe67f3d0077595743
2afe0a84abad24f49ba49d833b9c18072be03459
2584 F20110109_AABVHI grieb_m_Page_033.txt
612699a9969ae4c0dca510f138741b48
2c59c2cad00d249b0ed97b4fdc67208e1926902e
F20110109_AABTNW grieb_m_Page_124thm.jpg
6e30d97d26abff32ead8dd22edc09f1a
815cbcaf1a255e36f519ed1fc33999f019428c37
6463 F20110109_AABUKQ grieb_m_Page_135thm.jpg
a13b2b841b0cfea5b7dd149371843251
7d49c92415774d2f6fb2aeadd80fe13dec9fbc73
2283 F20110109_AABVHJ grieb_m_Page_034.txt
062e1ef7c29a829e8340eb0f7f578b46
870573b3ec41bac0e6470756c0ae0a0dcbf02dc9
F20110109_AABTNX grieb_m_Page_097.tif
a3039c7ecf27bb6a7cf0e16774da59a4
3b82d7a6660f09ef27ac034fbcb8e4b07448fcf8
6222 F20110109_AABUKR grieb_m_Page_095thm.jpg
3b79c2657be28dbc03735b23553f4abb
1ee7e8b447ef03fa43df10c7e59b488ac5426740
2431 F20110109_AABVHK grieb_m_Page_035.txt
09d8904131f6cfa00d7299881ec5e94a
5545182aa5a4dcf70ba9b29f9f772b8a1c63d766
105753 F20110109_AABTNY grieb_m_Page_214.jp2
2d21bd7f53b2130d22bfab81801c7bef
ffe0286b5e457224f3c912bd6739165884d6441a
20506 F20110109_AABUKS grieb_m_Page_001.jpg
fa5f1d28c4a821015e150020c454fb32
e95b7d376b8dca7b1318f48e02b9904f08607eb3
2188 F20110109_AABVHL grieb_m_Page_039.txt
910442d94e7ae6f7ca7550462d681d63
57d154125b6eb6040508dac618379f2ec7ac91da
6317 F20110109_AABTNZ grieb_m_Page_148thm.jpg
8416a36843e68be8d09e2c66b10eea7a
2b46338c2b5f08d83b4d98587156d73f3d4320e8
2709 F20110109_AABUKT grieb_m_Page_003.jpg
d564902e400c4e996d5f4a4d7c77aaac
165d4be2e1045f2102ca4c6528e38564f81a216f
F20110109_AABVHM grieb_m_Page_040.txt
aebb5d23265961addab427090b9f120e
80c9d6304bd6594197f48a9f0e007029235a40c9
118573 F20110109_AABUKU grieb_m_Page_199.jp2
bfdfc34d1f5f39361b59937908866e11
f489d0b6c2466272a3f2b37672b637fee9b00cc3
2265 F20110109_AABVHN grieb_m_Page_042.txt
133ad62fe955e80c71ba1096e99da573
6fdc9607d4ff5511d49087718ffaa4b8c0f91cf5
70553 F20110109_AABUKV grieb_m_Page_070.pro
94295177a970d6cf202a7dd95e8ce292
6ffc15ef32eddd5afe21f34ff054bca27b6ca4aa
3044 F20110109_AABVHO grieb_m_Page_044.txt
f807144949abcf1cb74fc331f244dddb
a9cc48fb3483b667b6d80338b050c43ae7b75453
6245 F20110109_AABUKW grieb_m_Page_149thm.jpg
dc257983d08806ebc417546ad7f39097
c2b3b27d269789b78a231f84927c51b773cddbf3
2211 F20110109_AABVHP grieb_m_Page_045.txt
287fdb6e321f3ac2b7469992eba0d03d
acccb4a4b1fc743a58e6f15d7b16615941613341
115228 F20110109_AABUKX grieb_m_Page_110.jp2
35d3aa5c22c11cdbe5fa56b3d82491d7
89b6cf7258edada012f463f730b0643e2a6d096d
2317 F20110109_AABVHQ grieb_m_Page_047.txt
c33ecdc1d15fa9d3957166b2f6768720
cddea715302ea920d51bfa65badf2bfa18f2af21
97135 F20110109_AABUKY grieb_m_Page_131.jpg
3637368b560127e30b3ce2864d14f5dc
02b0ec5dba82b74d7a6f932ca19f1c0bb34b203e
1968 F20110109_AABVHR grieb_m_Page_054.txt
ac2d4ca654d65ab469bf01c3cc1a5af5
b06cf32038e4067095fa55b8c9933307a2da7cf1
6176 F20110109_AABUKZ grieb_m_Page_043thm.jpg
94424954c0a63fd16c6c16966c0a749f
0c12e99522838e9ad405f03869a57baedfce59f5
2446 F20110109_AABVHS grieb_m_Page_055.txt
f4f684bfdf461657ca3992cd2d77a4fc
0c5b64df0677f86a1caa924b12242581d79b9ad7
2090 F20110109_AABVHT grieb_m_Page_059.txt
d50b8edef64407ebc1d9b73738d7d9e3
66e0882519bca9c002defc8b58051bf30ac22273
2218 F20110109_AABVHU grieb_m_Page_060.txt
f1cdd66c7adc69841c487d6cf13c70cf
6f18bd0c42a16a8125392551c5028252857b7834
27587 F20110109_AABTTA grieb_m_Page_221.QC.jpg
85ee4181d546b2759bcdcdb797b6a116
58f43fcf0216dc78c998c0bf3abf88aefded09e7
2298 F20110109_AABVHV grieb_m_Page_063.txt
287d5e2ce229b30b9c4d7e40aa815ddb
ac68be1338bb746fe9989642159cd6163e67be37
27249 F20110109_AABTTB grieb_m_Page_223.QC.jpg
2bce3a4c8a388b23012c9b045152c4f0
0e41fbf240a4c1ff434331cd5a1620a18e4aef67
851 F20110109_AABVHW grieb_m_Page_064.txt
f5cf505085f6f0e485e0717b8b25fb34
5b9155c9b9b8269f425f68746ee9030987ec327d
86289 F20110109_AABTTC grieb_m_Page_168.jpg
b6fe49ddfb40511adc51cc824765a9c3
0b13500beaa28c9a1b25aeaca18d57a668dc3d34
1718 F20110109_AABVHX grieb_m_Page_065.txt
d7ac3381af48adc307002988aa6f5560
0546965dd53308fd81d692b3cd698239d16976f8
F20110109_AABTTD grieb_m_Page_023.tif
3d0f228d0d7d80399be0890f824130ce
10df88433d758ac7600e7571a33c6fcd6c959f90
2312 F20110109_AABVHY grieb_m_Page_067.txt
8072c9af16c4e171511477ab6106ff7d
9cbf833a84d07d957a37211edeef8b0b310bedc0
27831 F20110109_AABTTE grieb_m_Page_147.QC.jpg
c33f8e4b6ecf552ae58f3747510f2779
8a19cbe6db4d6edba95e4f0635a552e45c32907f
2427 F20110109_AABVHZ grieb_m_Page_069.txt
b400d322e40d36ba03fe72c44dcbb94a
ca5aef4d975bff87d34a6f6c87d77a35873ad76b
71881 F20110109_AABTTF grieb_m_Page_131.pro
9c836508431339112c8ceb0bd5883a71
50926ad62e5c1a7fb32cfe1596bec7008d8dfddd
69275 F20110109_AABTTG grieb_m_Page_119.pro
c57a1d1512d21fe001671f58f0f56237
b08d52cac5126d1bfa9fdc3aeec7c5a6d693047b
F20110109_AABTTH grieb_m_Page_056.tif
ef93eee030761296a00b58a0cf4139ad
451a048153b8fe5b53b4f761b2d39e0eb5fa29f2
4080 F20110109_AABUQA grieb_m_Page_002.jpg
aad769571317d28ba0624b72ac1a7770
a09ff6ff661e0089d599efcc96e8ac0d21009986
130525 F20110109_AABTTI grieb_m_Page_138.jp2
e8577cd0ae7e0d89928171ceab8c3a22
fd93f530b4f5004aeb3d946a39c8d896a6472b4d
F20110109_AABUQB grieb_m_Page_057.tif
8be2f35852add44f5d4faab84ba6bd38
5086a94ee2abdb7ed8c158372e5090e5ea9fc63a
86987 F20110109_AABTTJ grieb_m_Page_143.jpg
2b6f3aae7d9dbfd3fd5b3ad42fb034d6
5c5d4ce63412fadff3016178d19dd0c578ebc1ea
26167 F20110109_AABUQC grieb_m_Page_207.QC.jpg
dfc8defcb7ab8052200ad6661481048b
c32e73fb1e05c2bffd7009b44c9d67a1b4f79e1a
64002 F20110109_AABTTK grieb_m_Page_104.pro
5d7a9e33665b6815f8a0e30896e3fc6f
7de4b053c32a7fba04d29941f14d28bf08e5b811
6092 F20110109_AABUQD grieb_m_Page_054thm.jpg
69f807ea52243a0725c0e91acb554efa
9b8581ef9dcb8b10f39636c088726216b2a2ad6b
82825 F20110109_AABTTL grieb_m_Page_166.jpg
239bfa3308076d6e777afdc66cf3d0cf
c13a887a633c1bb422633681ee28b5c6bdb89c82
F20110109_AABUQE grieb_m_Page_151.tif
46f541f46228c654f2810650d28b1ae7
0918bfa6ee300f301503ed9f8388fca90c19acf9
117683 F20110109_AABTTM grieb_m_Page_042.jp2
9d74d961a509f9be91ee6368283faa81
18611e83b115cd7d9304603d9680e47272f29225
112676 F20110109_AABUQF grieb_m_Page_090.jp2
5d1b1c9085dfb511377e73fe58c2f384
1fd5252a320b54b6a8a1fee77f9dce7be17731e5
111050 F20110109_AABTTN grieb_m_Page_207.jp2
947a1389007618c3983e9dace5773533
e066e1546e46c6a0432a0553106b03af74f310c5
6651 F20110109_AABUQG grieb_m_Page_147thm.jpg
3fc5b80986e167907b872f9212465af2
c5b6371e367d7a41d108e92cc0b57a3892b7da7f
28055 F20110109_AABVNA grieb_m_Page_056.QC.jpg
fe28cc350b859d8f6adf24195af9b2f8
db2ebb9f6c9dc9eb10ea65fe4b034d8fb1c6e669
F20110109_AABTTO grieb_m_Page_133.tif
0d43fad7e8ac150215fe2ba642dd6858
9db6229647888cb77b7ef0c4ccc2170ff0f1799f
91467 F20110109_AABUQH grieb_m_Page_098.jpg
5e8ca1fd3e7a5ed4e8a16450b2413c3d
82a96bbec787c86bb646b65630e66673cf57b079



PAGE 1

TRANSFORMATIONS OF THE (SILVER) SCREEN: FILM AFTER NEW MEDIA By MARGIT GRIEB A DISSERTATION PRESENTED TO THE GRADUATE SCHOOL OF THE UNIVERSITY OF FLOR IDA IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA 2003

PAGE 2

Copyright 2003 by Margit Grieb

PAGE 3

For Don

PAGE 4

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS First and foremost, I would like to thank my dissertation committee chair, Prof. Nora M. Alter, for providing me with many invaluable years of mentoring and diligent assistance and guidance in every stage of this dissertation. It was her remarkable scholarly expertise that guided my first steps into academic research and her encouragement and knowledge that helped me continue with my studies. I also thank the other members of my committee, Prof. Keith Bullivant, Prof. Franz Futterknecht, and Prof. Gregory Ulmer, for their valuable comments and suggestions. A special note of thanks goes to Prof. Ulmer for sharing with me his creative and insightful perspective on issues concerning new media. I am also grateful to the Department of Germanic and Slavic Studies for providing me with many years of financial and intellectual support. I owe special gratitude to the members of the departmental office staff, Sophia Kurzweg and Annemarie Sykes, who have contributed in many ways to making my life as a graduate student more bearable. Many thanks go also to my friends Yves Clemmen and Will Lehman for patiently listening to my ideas and providing constructive criticism. Most of all, I am grateful to Don Wilder, without whom I never may have developed the interest in technology which served as the foundation for this project. Most importantly, his patience, encouragement, and unwavering support have been a constant source of energy and inspiration for me over the years. I also thank Arielle for being my friend and making me smile when I most needed it. Final thanks go to Louis, iv

PAGE 5

Oso, Kodi, and Charlie, whose companionship kept me focused on what is important in life. v

PAGE 6

TABLE OF CONTENTS page ACKNOWLEDGMENTS.................................................................................................iv ABSTRACT.....................................................................................................................viii CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION........................................................................................................1 Definitions....................................................................................................................1 Outline..........................................................................................................................6 Focus.............................................................................................................................7 2 NEW MEDIA IN THEORY AND PRACTICE.........................................................13 The Experiment of Epic Theater.................................................................................13 The Epic Theater Stage.......................................................................................17 The Lehrstck and Schaustck Meet Technology...............................................20 Building on Brecht......................................................................................................23 Interaction, Participation, and Vergngen...........................................................23 Hypermediation...................................................................................................34 Brechtian Theory and Recent Developments in the Public Sphere.....................47 Conclusion: Brecht after BrechtContinuations and Transgressions.......................51 3 VIDEO AND FILM....................................................................................................56 The Emergence and Development of Video as an Artistic Medium..........................56 Video and Television...........................................................................................56 HDTV..................................................................................................................66 Wim Wenders: Rebel without a Clear Cause?...........................................................69 The Superiority of the Filmic Image over Other Recordings..............................72 Wenders as Digital Guru.....................................................................................79 Until the End of the World or How to Split HD from TV...................................81 Video Recording as an Act of Violence: Wenders on Surveillance....................90 Video, TV, the Artist/Author and the Auteur: Film as Craft/Handwerk.............98 Conclusion: Technology and the Difficulty of Representing History/Memory.......109 Abandoning German-ness.................................................................................109 Recording the Past and Future on Video and Film............................................112 4 COMPUTER GAMES AND FILM.........................................................................119 vi

PAGE 7

The Influence of Digital Technology on Cinema.....................................................119 Run Lara Run............................................................................................................123 Style Eclipses Content: Reinventing Popular Appeal.......................................123 Films and Games: A Winning Combination?...................................................129 Conquering Space through Speed.....................................................................132 The Quest for Narrative.....................................................................................141 Superweib or Superwoman?..............................................................................145 Conclusion: Popular Cinema and Reflections on Originality...................................151 5 STORAGE AND DISTRIBUTION THROUGH NEW MEDIA............................154 Film Storage and Distribution: From the Early Years to the Internet......................154 Films on CD-ROM: Valie Exports Medial Anagrams............................................160 Syntagma and its Function in Bilder der Berhrungen.....................................161 Intersections of Feminism and Technology......................................................166 Interactivity........................................................................................................173 The Interface as Mise-en-Abyme......................................................................175 Limits and Control.............................................................................................180 The Next Generation of Film Storage: The DVD-Video.........................................183 Laserdisc Makes Way for DVD-Video.............................................................183 Making Films Special: DVD Packaging and Marketing...................................187 Setting the Mood: The DVD-Video Interface...................................................197 Conclusion: What are Film and Cinema? Towards an Expanded Definition...........201 LIST OF REFERENCES.................................................................................................205 BIOGRAPHICAL SKETCH...........................................................................................208 vii

PAGE 8

Abstract of Dissertation Presented to the Graduate School of the University of Florida in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy TRANSFORMATIONS OF THE (SILVER) SCREEN: FILM AFTER NEW MEDIA By Margit Grieb May 2003 Chair: Nora M. Alter Major Department: Germanic and Slavic Studies Transformations of the (Silver) Screen: Film After New Media focuses on German cinema and new media productions. Within each of the chapters I examine emerging technologies such as video, digital video, HDTV, videogames, and new technologies of distribution and storage, e.g., Internet, satellite-streaming, CD-ROM, and DVD-Video, and explore their impact on films and filmmakers, including Wim Wenders, Tim Tykwer, and Valie Export. Using Bertolt Brechts theories of implementing new media technologies (i.e., film and radio) in his epic theater as a point of departure, I look at how the aesthetic representation of emerging media, embedded within the older representational system of film, is employed to enhance and expand the latters capabilities for artistic expression. One of the questions I attempt to answer is: How can Brechts epic practice be adapted successfully to the study and employment of new media in art? I also address the relationship between gender and technology, in particular with media that traditionally have been codified as male. I am particularly interested in how artists re-invent and re-define the form and content of the conventional medium of film viii

PAGE 9

and its institutional apparatus, the cinema, through the use of a technical innovation. My arguments throughout the dissertation engage with the work of film, media, culture, and feminist critics of the 20 th century, including, among others, Theodor W. Adorno, Walter Benjamin, Jay David Bolter, Bertolt Brecht, Hans Magnus Enzensberger, Valie Export, Richard Grusin, Donna Haraway, Katherine Hayles, Friedrich Kittler, Peter Lunenfeld, Roswitha Mueller, Marita Sturken, Sherry Turkle, Gregory Ulmer, and Wim Wenders. ix

PAGE 10

CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION [T]here seems to be a good deal of confusion as to what is new and what is old, while fear that the old will return has become mixed with fear that the new will step in [. .], artists would be well advised not to rely blindly on the assurance that new ideas are welcome. Yet art can only find its feet by going ahead [. .]. Bertolt Brecht, Brecht on Theater Definitions In the last decade the term new media has all but become synonymous with emerging digital technologies. Indeed, Lev Manovich, in his seminal study The Language of New Media, defines new media as graphics, moving images, sounds, shapes, spaces, and texts that have become computable (20), and the equally important Remediation. Understanding New Media by Jay David Bolter and Richard Grusin takes a similar approach equating new media with digital media. My own study employs the terminology new media in a way that relates to the more traditional semantic roots of the term. New media, in the following chapters, are emerging twentieth century technologies, analog and digital, that have in some way influenced, altered, refashioned, redirected, or even replaced the nineteenth/twentieth century technology of film and its institutional apparatus, the cinema. The designation new is not meant to evoke the notion that new media are historically or aesthetically unique, and developed out of a distinct rupture with any prior systems. On the contrary, I base my inquiry on the premise that new media emerge from within a historical, socio-political, and aesthetic system and draw upon this heritage for 1

PAGE 11

2 their own definitions. New media, in my study, are emerging representational systems that differ considerably in their technological make-up from existing technologies of the cinema and which are able to expand, change, improve upon, or even replace aspects of the latters function within society. What renders these media new is not a matter of singularity or uniqueness as a whole, but emerges as an unprecedented way of arranging that which is already familiar. I begin my inquiry with an examination of Bertolt Brechts theory of Epic Theater that perceived as a new medium, capable of transforming the culturally established institution of theater. Although most of the technologies I discuss do, in fact, belong to the category digital, it is less their binary origin that is definitive for my study than the fact that the digital revolution has exerted more influence on film than any other singular technological development. Even television, which ranks as a close second, has gained most of its influential momentum from digital modifications. As Manovich has pointed out, the computer has evolved as an acting filter for all types of cultural productions (64). Therefore, although the term new media may not be synonymous with digital media, but the two often overlap. In the last decade, a number of studies have appeared that successfully inaugurate the study of new media (speak digital media) as a scholarly field in its own right, one that is no longer delegated as a subordinate category of the greater fields of film, media, visual, popular culture, or cultural studies. Instead, new media studies, exists as a separate field, albeit built on the traditions of film and visual studies. This link to the fields of film and visual studies has, in part, allowed for it to be theorized within the rubric of Humanities generally, and contemporary critical theory, specifically. In other words, theories of new media are decidedly philosophical and cultural in their base, thereby

PAGE 12

3 removing digital technologies from remaining in the exclusive domain of computer science. Theorists thus illuminate how new media function not only as a technology, but also as a dynamic force in contemporary culture. There exists a rich tradition of scholarship concerned with new media which appeared prior to the explosion of digital technology and before new media studies had officially achieved recognition as a field in its own right, such as Marshall McLuhans Understanding Media (1964), Hans Magnus Enzensbergers Baukasten zu einer Theorie der Medien (1957-88), and Gregory Ulmers Teletheory (1989), to name but a few. In Understanding Media McLuhan discusses the state of the then beginning explosion of mass media. He offers a media-centered interpretation of history by attempting to isolate types of communication media as the moving force in historical development. McLuhan coined the expressions global village and "the medium is the message" to describe how and what we communicate. As a contemporary of McLuhan, Enzensberger takes issue with Understanding Medias technological determinism and instead situates the new technologies into a socio-political context. In his essays he argues for media to become tools for everyone, instead of remaining in the hands of economic powers, and for them to develop into a productive rather than exploitative apparatus. Like McLuhan and Enzensberger, Ulmers book also identifies the new media as fundamentally changing the state of communications. He postulates that video and electronic technologies are essential tools to provoke inventive thinking as a privileged discourse in the new era of communications. He argues that video allows for the institutional dissemination of inventive thinking in a similar way that the alphabet allowed for critical literate argumentation.

PAGE 13

4 Since then, in the 1990s, several significant works have contributed to the further development of new media studies, most notably (in chronological order) Donna Haraways Simians, Cyborgs, and Women (1991), George P. Landows Hypertext (1992), Neil Postmans Technopoly (1992), Sherry Turkles Life on the Screen (1995), and Katherine Hayless How We Became Posthuman (1999). Haraways study, in particular her essay A Cyborg Manifesto, established a connection between new technologies and feminism. Her arguments pointed to a new hybrid humanity, one that no longer operated based on binary categories such as natural and artificial. Although, unlike Haraways study, Landows text is not based on an explicitly feminist premise, he does establish hypertext, with its non-linear structure, to be inherently open to advance the struggles of those underprivileged in society. His study offers the first comprehensive analysis of this new language, used mainly in online applications. While most of the theoretical analyses mentioned thus far have approached new technologies from a positive standpoint, Neil Postman offers a decidedly negative critique of the interaction between culture and technology in Technopoly. For him, a Technopoly is a society that holds technology and science in such high regard, that it elevates them into a position superior to human judgment and capable of regulating all human affairs. Sherry Turkle, on the other hand, dispels much of common criticisms about online technologies in her Life on the Screen and sees new technologies of communication as potentially subversive tools and spaces. Finally, Hayless How We Became Posthuman builds on Haraways cyborg theory and calls for a renewed investment and interest in materialism, especially in conjunction with information technologies.

PAGE 14

5 Studies on new media proliferated immensely as we approached and entered into the new millennium. The aforementioned Remediation (2000), Peter Lunenfelds Snap to Grid (2000), and The Language of New Media (2002) are the most important examples for this. In Remediation, Bolter and Grusin offer a convincing analysis of the media, as engaged in a constant refashioning of other, prior and contemporary, media. Snap to Grid sees 1989 as a decisive point in history which has brought about a shift in contemporary art and technology. Lunenfeld explores this shift and traces its effect on how we think about and react to our surroundings via the new computer-generated screens. Manovichs study of the nature and constitution of digital technologies has already become a classic text in the short period of its availability in print. 1 His basic arguments revolve around the cinematic nature that has shaped all digital media and serves as a filter of how we interact with the environment around us. In general, most of the books and essays on new media that have appeared in recent years have discussed, at least in part, what impact new technologies have had on existing media. This includes radio, music, photography, literature, graphic novels, television, and many other sites of artistic production. Since film represents the dominating visual technology of the 20 th century, new medias impact, digital and analog, on the cinema has arguably been the most conspicuous. Studies that have devoted considerable attention to new medias effects on film include the essays collected in Cinema Futures (1998, edited by Elsaesser and Hoffmann) and The New Media Book (2002, edited by Dan Harries), 1 However, most of Manovichs arguments in this book have appeared in other publications and were circulating widely online and in print before the publication of The Language of New Media.

PAGE 15

6 and, as already mentioned, The Language of New Media. 2 However, these accounts use a descriptive, general approach to evaluate the changes that have occurred in cinema productions of the last few years rather than providing pragmatic analyses of specific films and filmmakers, as do my chapters. Timothy Druckreys collection of essays in Electronic Media ( highlights that contemporary new media studies can trace part of its critical lineage to early 20 th -century German philosophical traditions from Martin Heidegger, Walter Benjamin, and the Frankfurt School critics, to Hans Magnus Enzensberger, and Friedrich Kittler, however, recent developments in new media studies have yet to leave a noticeable mark on the state of German studies in general. 3 Although theoretical foundations have been laid through essays by Friedrich Kittler, Florian Rtzer, Peter Weibel, Siegfried Zielinski, and Thomas Elsaesser, among others, there still exists a lack of practical applications of German as well as Anglo-American new media theory to German-speaking artistic productions. My account attempts to address this lack and provide analyses that specifically focuses on German artistic practices and productions within the context of new media. Outline As already mentioned, most new media scholarship has been focused on Anglo-American cultural productions. My study departs from these publications in that it includes German-specific case studies in chapters 3, 4, and 5. I am invoking these 2 Another book-long study treating cinematic interaction with new media, Future Cinema: The Cinematic Imaginary After Film, edited by Peter Weibel and Jeffrey Shaw and based on the November 2002 exhibition Future Cinema at the ZMK in Karlsruhe, is due to appear from MIT Press. 3 Electronic Media features essays by Heidegger, and Enzensberger, as well as essays informed by Critical Theory (a la Frankfurt school), Benjamin, Wittgenstein, Brger, and Freud.

PAGE 16

7 specific moments of new media/film interaction in order to show the inseparability of media form, content, and context in my approach, a notion that relies heavily on Brechts theories. My case studies are drawn exclusively from a broad field of German-language cultural production, the site of technical superiority as video artist Martha Rosler calls it (not without irony) (44), rather than covering a more comprehensive geographical area or centering on the U.S., a site where public viewership, aesthetic production, and critical evaluation have witnessed the most widely acknowledged instances of film and new media intersections. Instead of concentrating on general trends in how new media has and is affecting film, I narrow my critical focus to specific examples that illustrate very specific effects. My methodology is defined by evaluating films that are not spawned by the US studio production system. Instead I pay attention to filmmakers who are working within the European state-supported system, which traditionally has allowed more experimental work to emerge (although this is in the process of changing). In other words, this study is an off-center look at some of the most interesting effects of new media technologies on film. Focus My emphasis on revealing how the old medium of film has fared after its various physical and aesthetic encounters with new forms of visual technology also departs from the loci adopted by most other new media studies which have appeared in recent years. These studies have adopted the opposite stance and look at how new media are building on or changing older technologies. Important books using the new media after old media approach include the aforementioned Remediation and The Language of New

PAGE 17

8 Media, 4 as well as Snap to Grid, How We Became Posthuman, Florian Rtzers Digitale Weltentwrfe, Life on the Screen: Identity in the Age of the Internet, and several others. In contrast, my critical lens is focused foremost on film and only vis--vis this vantage point do I consider new media technologies. This approach is meant to follow in the footsteps of Brecht who, in the majority of his theoretical writing, concentrated his efforts on the theater in order to determine how the new media film and radio could transform it, rather than tracing the vice-versa effect. 5 In contrast, authors of other books in the field, such as Manovich, predominantly discuss the nature of emerging digital media and, only to fortify or supplement their analysis, give an account of the relationship new media share with older technologies (in a variety of contexts such as historical, social, technological, aesthetic, etc.). This is not to say that one approach is privileged over another, but it is important to point out this particular perspective, because it constitutes a shift of emphasis on which my arguments are built. Within each of the chapters I examine a specific emerging technology such as video, digital video, HDTV, computer/videogames, new technologies of distribution and 4 Although the predominant portion of The Language of New Media uses the from cinema to new media approach, Manovich devotes one chapter to tracing the opposite effecthow have digital technologies changed the cinema. But even in this chapter he continually reverts back to privileging the new over the old (as in his discussion of computer games as cinema). 5 Although Brecht devoted considerable energy to developing a theory of film and radio, which build on his thoughts on theater, his dramatic theories and techniques became his most influential contribution to media theory in the 20 th century. I use Brechts theory of the theater rather than his film or radio theory in my project for two interrelated reasons: 1) his theory of the theater addresses the act of adapting and incorporating new media into an existing representational form (just as my project attempts to do), and 2) his theories of film, radio and sound borrows heavily from his theater ideas and are therefore not dramatically different or new. What I do extract from his media theories, apart from the theater, is his openness to use ideas developed for one specific medium to apply them to another. When we try to come to terms with emerging cultural productions, forms, and apparatuses, we are dependent on our prior knowledge and experience to make sense of the so-called new. The emerging forms and practices themselves come into being that way, they do not erupt spontaneously out of nowhere; they incorporate an existing history simply by being preceded by other media.

PAGE 18

9 storage, e.g., DVD-Video, CD-ROM, Laserdisc, Internet, satellite-streaming, etc., and explore their impact on films and filmmakers, including Wim Wenders, Tom Tykwer, and Valie Export. I use Brechts theories of implementing new media technologies (i.e., film and radio) in his epic theater as a point of departure and expand on his ideas by analyzing and adapting the theories of other media critics to augment my own approach. In general, I am interested in how artists re-invent, re-define, or re-discover the form and content of the conventional medium of film and the cinema as an institution through the use of a technical innovation. The following chapters also address how artists, filmmakers, and theorists apply gender-specific concerns in their approach to new media and their wide-ranging influences. This includes an account of the creative employment of fictional characters to permeate traditionally defined and restricted categories of what constitute male and female spheres and stereotypes. Although most technologies developed in the 20 th century were initially conceptualized and constructed to serve a patriarchic order (often dealing with concerns of war and world order domination), they are not necessarily opposed to serving feminist ideologies Chapter 2, New Media in Theory and Practice, serves as a theory-centered introduction to the current and historical field of new media. I show special consideration for new media theory that includes arguments concerning the intersections of old and new technologies as well as theoretical discourses which negotiate the intersections of new media and gender studies. Due to the overwhelming presence of digital new media in my study, the theoretical background laid out in the second chapter also reflects this inflection. In this chapter, I rely heavily on critical concepts set forth by Walter Benjamin

PAGE 19

10 (his evaluation of the Epic Theater), Enzensberger (his notion of the consciousness industry), Bolter and Grusin (their terminology of hypermediation, immediacy, and remediation), and Jrgen Habermas, Oskar Negt, and Alexander Kluge (their theories concerning the public spheres), as well as Roswitha Mueller (her evaluation of Brechts impact on media theory). Apart from covering current and past theorists, I resort to a thinker and artist belonging to the early to mid-twentieth century, Brecht. One of the questions I attempt to answer in this chapter is: How can Brechts epic practice be adapted successfully to the study and employment of new media in film? I contend that applying an updated version of Brechtian tactics of producing alienation (and the resulting contemplative and critical distance), audience participation, humor, and delivering revolutionary entertainment to a large sector of society can lead to productive interactive experiences with and substantive evaluations of mediated spaces and artworks. Brechts significance to digital aesthetics and film production of the late 20 th and early 21 st century is not simply based on the similarity of the social, economic, and technological changes which he faced in the 1920s and 1930s and those that we face today. In other words, I do not propose to translate Brechts specific techniques without transformations to new media. The new technologies and historical particulars have made these techniques obsolete. Brecht, himself, would have strongly disagreed with such an approach. He saw the modern Epic Theater [. .] linked with certain trends, (76) and as such historically specific. He adds that new forms of representation demand techniques that are adjusted to fit them specifically. Because our present situation includes media, digital and analog, that were not part of Brechts context, his ideas have to be adapted to

PAGE 20

11 reflect these media. The filmmakers which I discuss in the subsequent chapters have all attempted to include digital and other new technologies into their filmmaking approach and therefore more or less overtly engaged with Brechts progressive ideas on changing an existing apparatus by introducing a new technology. In chapter 3, Video and Film, I investigate the influence of video and television on other media, especially film. I focus on Wim Wenderss practical employment as well as fictional treatment of video and TV technologies and attempt to explore not only his ambivalence toward advancements in visual recordings but also discuss the reflection of this emotionally unstable attitude within the fictional setting of his films. In my analysis, I use recent films, such as Until the End of the World (1991) and The End of Violence (1997) to exemplify my arguments. Although Wenders asserts in many of his theoretical remarks that his experimentation with new media confronts the technological and aesthetic limits of the medium in question, I illustrate that his negative assessment of video (digital or not) stems from a dissatisfaction with existing institutional constraints, not the medium itself. Chapter 4, Computer Games and Film, analyzes the impact of digital technologies on film. Specifically, I chronicle the emergence of the videogamea specific type of digital technologyand its interrelated and productive relationship with the medium film. Tim Tykwers Run Lola Run (1998) appears as an exemplar of an intra-filmic reference to extra-filmic new media, the computer/videogame, through the employment of a formal rupture. I show that Run Lola Runs reworking of the videogame aesthetic and subject matter represents a successful attempt at opening up dominant

PAGE 21

12 cinematic conventions while still retaining its popular appeal for audiences in Germany and abroad. Chapter 5, Storage Distribution through New Media, looks at new technologies of distribution and storage, such as video, laserdisc, CD-ROM, DVD-Video, and the WWW, and examines how these technologies have shaped film consumption, distribution, form and content, as well as traces the effect on their accompanying institutional systems. In this final section I concentrate in particular on Valie Exports CD-ROM Bilder der Berhrungen to determine the effects of repackaging and recontextualizing her experimental film Syntagma. I pay special attention to Exports feminist ideological goals and how distribution and storage media can undermine or accommodate such ambitions. Moreover, I give an account of the current state of DVD-Video distribution of German language films, especially re-releases of films from the Weimar Republic and the era of New German Cinema, and how this distribution has affected the politics of restoration, as well as the appearance and reception of these films worldwide. Throughout this study, I address the relationship between gender and technology, in particular with media that traditionally have been codified as male. I am particularly interested in how female and male artists re-invent and re-define gender stereotypes and politics of access inherent in technological conventions. Each medium discussed, including film, carries with it a cultural context in which it appears, and therefore also appears embedded in familiar contentions of gender. In the artistic contexts, in which all of these media appear in my study, these discursive practices are both undermined and reinforced, and, at best, defined in completely new terms.

PAGE 22

CHAPTER 2 NEW MEDIA IN THEORY AND PRACTICE Anybody who advises us not to make use of such new apparatus just confirms the apparatuss right to do bad work; he forgets himself out of sheer open-mindedness, for he is thus proclaiming his willingness to have nothing but dirt produced for him. At the same time he deprives us in advance of the apparatus which we need in order to produce, since this way of producing is likely more and more to supersede the present one, forcing us to speak through increasingly complex media and to express what we have to say by increasingly inadequate means. Bertolt Brecht, Brecht on Theater The Experiment of Epic Theater What matters therefore is the exemplary character of production, which is able first to induce other producers to produce, and second to put an improved apparatus at their disposal. And this apparatus is better the more consumers it is able to turn into producers, that is, readers or spectators into collaborators. Walter Benjamin, The Author as Producer Walter Benjamins essays, The Work of Art in the Age of Mechanical Reproduction (1936) and The Author as Producer (1934), emerged in the context of discussions about the function and responsibility of art in the twentieth century. 1 Whereas the former examines the changing appearance, purpose, and effect of art in a new technological age, the latter presupposes these changed conditions and uses them as a 1 Shortly after these essays were written, the possible intervention of art in political realities culminated in a particularly contentious discourse in the specific context of Germanys National-Socialist government in the so-called Expressionismus-Realismus Debatte of the nineteen-thirties. The discussion involved writers living in exile in order to escape the persecution of the Nazi regime. It addressed their role as dissident cultural representatives and producers, as well as the function of literature in general. The debate initially set out to take up the issue of expressionism as either a direct artistic link leading to the rise of the National Socialist Party and Hitler or as a significant literary precursor of the anti-fascist artistic production, e.g., from expressionistic to anti-fascist works in the case of exile writer Brecht. Essays by Bernhard Ziegler (alias Alfred Kurella) and Klaus Mann dealing with Gottfried Benns leanings toward fascism were published in September of 1937 in the influential exile literary journal Das Wort. See Schmitts Die Expressionismusdebatte: Materialien zu einer marxistischen Realismuskonzeption for a collection of the contributions to this debate. 13

PAGE 23

14 point of departure. 2 In The Author as Producer, Benjamin examines the ways in which the process of reproduction can either render a work a revolutionary tool or only propagate the very social conditions to which it ostensibly reacts. Benjamin uses Brechts theories of Epic Theater as an illustration of a successful attempt at changing the former bourgeois cultural apparatus, the theater, into a tool that artists can utilize to produce politically relevant material. In his arguments, Benjamin emphasizes how Epic Theater, instead of competing with newer instruments of publication, seeks to use and learn from them, in short to enter into a debate with them (266, my emphasis). This dialogical relationship, of course, refers not only to Brechts transformation of the Aristotelian theater in general, but also applies specifically to his innovative approach incorporating new media forms, especially those already in (ab)use by the Fascist Propaganda Ministry to introduce aesthetics into politics, namely film and radio (Work of Art 24). Benjamin responds to and reiterates Brechts focus on Epic Theaters intention to serve as an institutional critique, emphasizing that the plays effect on the audience is less important than its effect on the theater as an institution (Brecht 22). This emphasis attests to Brechts conviction that attempting to produce socially responsible entertainment would have a two-fold effect: it would transform the medium, which in turn would change the message, i.e., deliver a revolutionary product to the audience. Peter Brger points out in his seminal study Theory of the Avant-Garde that Brecht constitutes an artistic enigma in the context of vanguard art movements and artists of the twenties and thirties. He declares that although Brecht is part of the historical avant2 Benjamin wrote The Author as Producer in the context of Soviet discussions about the function and task of literature in a socialist society. His essay was delivered as a speech at the Institute for Studies Related to Fascism in Paris, on April 27, 1934. The essays aim is therefore more praxis-centered than the theory-based The Work of Art in the Age of Mechanical Reproduction.

PAGE 24

15 garde, he is also diametrically opposed to one of this movements fundamental characteristics: the avant-gardes attempt to destroy art as an institution. Indeed, Brecht does not attempt to abolish the theater as an institutional apparatus. 3 Instead, according to Brger, he intends to sublate theaters bourgeois function in exchange for the new, ideologically altered, Epic Theater (88-89). 4 In retrospect, Brechts approach constituted a more productive artistic method than that of the other vanguard artists. 5 Since art as an institution was destroyed by neither the historical avant-garde in the beginning of the twentieth century, nor by the neo-avant-garde of the sixties and seventies, it becomes questionable whether such an undertaking was ever possible or even desirable. Brechts attempts at reworking an apparatus from within its own workings not only has more practical value, but it also makes his approach relevant for contemporary art practice, where the spheres of art and commodification are inextricably intertwined. However, I agree with Brger when he warns not to try to adopt Brechts and Benjamins solutions along with their recognition of the problem and to transfer them ahistorically to the present (90). Brecht, himself, would have strongly disagreed with such an approach. He saw the modern Epic Theater linked with certain [socio-political] trends, (76) and as such historically specific. In his theories on the theater Brecht explicitly states that all methods and stimuli are bound to their historical context and that 3 I am using the term apparatus in a Brechtian sense which, for the theater, includes the stage and theater building, the performers and the plays being performed, the promotional system, the social practices that are at work in theater-going, and the institutional backbone of all that involves the theater. In modern usage, Brechts apparatus would be called a medium. 4 Brger defines the Hegelian understanding of sublation in reference to art as not to be simply destroyed, but transferred to the praxis of life where [art] would be preserved, albeit in a changed form (49). 5 For an overview of general avant-garde practices and artworks described in Brgers Theory of the Avant-Garde, see pp. 55-82.

PAGE 25

16 they must be adapted (or even changed) to be applied successfully to a different historical context; reality alters; to represent it, the means of representation must alter too (110) Presently, the means of representation have been expanded beyond film and radio to include post-Brechtian analog and digital media. Therefore, our changed realities can and must be expressed using these new media. Specific Brechtian methods, replicated without alteration, cannot intervene in such changed realities. Many of the innovative techniques aimed at producing alienation in Brechts Epic Theater have been co-opted by the language system of commodity culture and become almost commonplace in todays sphere of arts and entertainment (and where these two overlap) in mass media. Therefore, Brechts epic elements would, in Brechts own words, lack force and effectiveness (27) and could not have the force of what is startling (71) in contemporary contexts. 6 Frederic Jameson describes this phenomenon (which is symptomatic of postmodern society) as an assimilation of critical elements to the point where many of our older critical and evaluative categories no longer seem functional (31); this is the moment where an alienating component of Epic Theater becomes an innocuous diversion and/or part of a commercial configuration. Hans Magnus Enzensberger also echoes Brechts observation when he states: Once [such a moment is] annexed to the heritage that must be preserved, it is truly deprived of its life, that is, removed from criticism and exhibited as an embalmed holy relic (Aporias 19), but shifts the emphasis away from commercial commodification, as in Enzensbergers comment, to institutional canonization. Either way, alienation no longer takes place. However, Brechts approach, 6 Benjamin and Brecht both see shock, emerging from unexpected arrangement of the familiar, as a vital part of arts operative effect on the viewer. In a more contemporary account, in The Work of Culture in the Age of Cybernetic Systems, Bill Nichols sees the effect of shock re-emerging in digital simulations with the recognition of the reification of a fundamental social process, such as communication (129).

PAGE 26

17 while not his specific realization of it, is still relevant today due to his use of innovative practices and technology as key elements to administering institutional critiques, invigorating stagnant material and genres, and producing alienation, which collectively result in achieving a productive contemplative and critical distance for audiences. At this point, it is necessary to inquire into some of Brechts theoretical schemata for his implementation of technological innovations and chances for spectator interactivity in Epic Theater in order to extract some key elements that can survive an application in a digital epic practice. 7 The Epic Theater Stage The use of technological devices on stage was for Brecht an important step toward realizing his Epic Theater project. With the use of technology the stage began to tell a story. The narrator was no longer missing, along with the fourth wall (Brecht 71). 8 He introduced a myriad of devices into the staging of plays, most of which were taken from the domain of popular culture. He included film projections, radio transmissions, gramophone recordings, photographs, and other devices into his stage productions refusing to observe what had previously been regarded as a sphere of high culture, and therefore inappropriate to accommodate mass media. One of Brechts underlying motives for changing the character of the institution of theater was his deference and concern for the public as a whole and rooted in his political convictions. His break with conventions of realism and popular entertainment was 7 For a more rigorous and comprehensive analysis into Epic Theaters relationship to media theory in general, see Roswitha Muellers Bertolt Brecht and the Theory of Media. 8 By erecting the forth wall Brecht meant to signify the Aristotelian theaters practice to create the illusion that the events on stage were real and for spectators to be cut off from that reality, so that they can lose themselves in the action.

PAGE 27

18 motivated by his progressive political stance. He re-defined both categories, realistic and popular, in his Epic Theater which tried to be both, but not in terms of conventions. Brecht wanted to turn the theater into an apparatus that could be used in a way that might mean something to a contemporary public that earns real contemporary beef (6-7). The Epic Theater did not just appeal to upper middle class audiences (as did the bourgeois theater), but should speak to the masses as well. 9 However, this audience would not be put in a trance and addressed in emotional terms, as was the case in the old Aristotelian theater; only an appeal to reason would do (23). Brecht did not view the public as a homogenous mass, unable to conjure up any sensitivity toward aesthetic practices apart from meaningless entertainment. Instead, he points out that society cannot expect persons to act socially and politically responsible, hold them accountable for their actions, but simultaneously assume that their aesthetic competence is that of a child. He declares: The one tribute we can pay the audience is to treat it as thoroughly intelligent. It is utterly wrong to treat people as simpletons when they are grown up at seventeen. I appeal to the reason (14). This positive attitude toward the spectator made it possible for Brecht to develop a variety of possible approaches in order to address what he saw as untapped potential and shape his Epic Theater based on the premise of pedagogy. 10 His 9 He sometimes referred to this audience as audience of the scientific age (28, 183-188), which lent his experiment the historical impetus to change the theater that still directed itself toward the non-scientific person, the bourgeois spectator. 10 This attitude set him apart from other German cultural critics such as Lukcs and Adorno. The former believes that the spectator needs a positive hero for identification (Es geht um den Realismus), and the latter considers the spectator to be completely consumed by and an object of the culture industry, unable to resist its capitalist ideology (The Culture Industry 142). Benjamin, on the other hand, agrees with Brecht and sees a positive change in the reception of art which loses its aura through the invention of mass reproduction (see his essay The Work of Art in the Age of Mechanical Reproduction). Although, it must be mentioned that Brechts optimistic attitude toward the public, after 1933, became tarnished by the events that lead up to and took place during the Nazi-era. He concedes that the lack of success of Epic Theater is related to the fact that their taste and their instincts are oppressed [. .](160), but still maintains the possibility of success in transforming them (161).

PAGE 28

19 aesthetic tools include technology, humor, and didactics; his goals encompass pleasure and development of critical thinking. Brechts ultimate aim was to arrive at meaningful entertainment. In contrast, the bourgeois institution of theater expected the audience to hang its brains up in the cloakroom along with its coat (27) (not unlike what Hollywood expects its audience to do in much of contemporary cinema). In order to produce such meaningful entertainment, Brecht employed the help of technology. He was not alone in his enthusiasm for bringing recent technical innovations into the service of the theater. Brechts contemporaries Walter Gropius and Erwin Piscator both sought to use new media as a tool to revamp traditional stage props and techniques. Since Brecht initially collaborated with both Piscator and Gropius on several projects, their methods helped shape his own practices. 11 However, unlike Brecht who always insisted on anti-illusionism, Piscator and Gropius saw their innovative ideas as means to submerge the audience in the heightened illusion of being present at the actual site of scenic events (Mueller 7). Nonetheless, there are theoretical overlaps between Piscator and Brecht in reference to implementing technology on stage. Like Brecht, Piscator used fiction and documentary film scenes to comment on the dramatic action which they interrupted, in the style of a Greek chorus (9). But most importantly, Piscator envisioned developing a technically enhanced stage practice that no longer considers the audience a fictive concept, but includes it into the theater as a live force (quoted in Mueller 7). 12 Although these enhancements were meant to bring the audience into the 11 Most of these collaborations took place in the late 1920s and included the play Rasputin (based on Tolstoi) and the Good Soldier Schweik (based on Hasek). 12 For a more detailed account of Piscators practices and theories concerning the stage see Piscator by Heinrich Goertz.

PAGE 29

20 dramatic action as participants, Piscator never went as far with this concept as Brecht ultimately did, especially when he introduced the Lehrstck into his repertoire. The Lehrstck and Schaustck Meet Technology In order to keep the productive apparatus of the working-class theatre well clear of the general drug traffic conducted by bourgeois show business (Brecht 88-89) and change the attitude of both institution and audience, Brecht developed the concept of the Lehrstck 13 (as he translates it, a learning play). 14 What makes the concept of a didactic play so interesting and also topical is its emphasis on instruction through active performance, rather than passive observation; it eradicates the distance between performer and spectator ordinarily expected in the theater. In the Lehrstck the spectator is called upon to become an actor in the play. Through the alienating principles that are applied to acting in Epic Theater, the participator attains a critical distance to the role s/he performs and the materials used in the performance, for example, new technological devices. Underlying this new dramatic genre, of course, was Brechts political commitment and the notion that moral and political lessons could be taught best by participation in an actual performance (33). He set up the Lehrstck in opposition to Aristotelian theater whose main purpose was to show the world as a timeless, static whole. The Lehrstck, on the other hand, shows the world in a dynamic manner, as constantly changing and, most importantly, as changeable (79). 13 Some examples of Lehrstcke are Ozean Flug (1929), Der Jasager (1929), Die Massnahme (1930), and Die Ausnahme und Die Regel (1930). His most successful and critically acclaimed plays such as Die Mutter (1930), Die heilige Johanna der Schlachthfe (1929-1930), Mutter Courage und ihre Kinder (1939), and Das Leben des Galilei (1938-44, 1945-53) were not conceived as didactic plays but rather as Schaustcke, created for professional actors. 14 Brecht renders the term Lehrstck into English as learning play (it should actually be teaching play). I think this semantic ambiguity conveys the dual function of the didactic play nicely: it is used by the performers and the playwright to teach and to learn simultaneously.

PAGE 30

21 The Ozean Flug (1929), for example, is an experiment in the application of Umfunktionierung 15 to the radio and performed as a Hrspiel-Lehrstck (radio play). 16 Brecht declared that the play is not intended to be of use to the present-day radio but to alter it. The increasing concentration of mechanical means call for a kind of resistance by the listener (Brecht 32, my emphasis). In the first production of the play, in 1929 at the Baden Baden Music Festival, accompanied by the music of Kurt Weill and Paul Hindemith, Brecht demonstrated the radios potential as a medium for communication rather than distribution. On the left side of the stage was the radio orchestra with singers and technical gadgets, and on the right side was the actor (intended listener) who performed Lindberghs part. However, the play was originally conceived as a Hrspiel, not a play on stage. Therefore, as a radio play, the part of Lindbergh was meant to be read by the actual listeners at home who were given scripts of the text. In another production, more true to Brechts original conception, the play used the radio as a broadcasting device to transmit music and solo performances into schools where the pupils could sing the chorus and play some of the roles themselves. Instead of the radios usual function, that is the transmission of state-sanctioned materials, it could be used as a device to develop collaboration [. .] between participant and apparatus (31). Brecht had a very specific goal in mind when he developed the Lehrstck. Its theoretical basis was related primarily to his socio-political outlook and was firmly 15 Umfunktionierung is a term coined by Brecht to mean freeing the means of production and serving the class struggle (Benjamin Author 261). 16 This Hrspiel was initially titled Der Lindberghflug and later changed because of Lindberghs sympathies with the Nazi Party.

PAGE 31

22 grounded in the historical context of Brechts time and location. Roswitha Mueller explains: The Lehrstck [. .] marks a qualitative change in the structure of communication itself. The historical basis for the Lehrstck is a society in transition to socialism. In this situation the central concern is to find ways of learning that are adequate for the new state. Lenins question about how and what one should learn is the basic impulse for the theory of the Lehrstck. [. .] The Lehrstck does not imply total discontinuity with epic techniques. Brecht emphasizes that epic techniques are the basis for the Lehrstck but that many of the projected goals of the new drama can be realized to their fullest extent only within the context of a Lehrstck. (28-29) However, elsewhere she notes that the Lehre that was embedded in this type of play cannot be contained by Marxism-Leninism as a kind of dogmatic thesis play. It remains a genuinely utopian project. As far as the general goals of the Lehrstck are concerned, these theoretical tenets are not meant to tower over the play as eternal truths. While Brecht departed from and made use of current political theories, he approached them undogmatically. Aware of their faulty and time-bound character, he opened them up for discussion. Brecht expressly pointed out that the commentary may be changed at any time: It is full of mistakes with respect to our time and its virtues, and it is unusable for other times. In that sense the Lehre and the opinions or theories are a pre-text, a provisional statement summarizing the state of the arts and theory as a starting point for further development. (37) This further development can be seen as the act of adapting Brechts Lehrstck theory and practice into contemporary contexts of interactive media. However, as in every act of adaptation, not only changing social and political contexts have to be considered but also changes in the approach are essential in order to make the transition to another medium. The nature of the new medium will define how the transition and adaptation can be successful. In the Schaustck technological innovations served a similar function as in the Lehrstck. Film projections were used to disrupt the performance, to intrude upon the representation with formulation (Brecht 43) (most obvious in the case of titles), and to historicize events, bringing the background to the forefront (in the case of narrative

PAGE 32

23 projections). Whereas representation effaced the artificiality and intervention of the technological devices, formulation would foreground them as separate media with specific tasks. Film scenes and titles also facilitated the epic style of acting. For Brecht, when the epic performer reads and watches, s/he cannot be carried away by her/his own acting; the performer retains an epic distance from the character that s/he plays (44, 57-58). Building on Brecht Interaction, Participation, and Vergngen The idea of audience/player interaction and participation was taken up again by Brecht in his theory on the radio. He envisioned the radio to become the finest possible communication apparatus in public life, if it knew how to receive as well as to transmit, to bring [the listener] into a relationship instead of isolating him (Brecht 52). Some years later, Enzensberger builds on Brechts theory and Benjamins two essays discussed earlier in his treatise Constituents of a Theory of the Media, 1970. Although formulated over thirty years ago, Enzensbergers observations still circulate in current media criticism. The main argument revolves around the lack of reciprocity in media such as radio, television, film, and video, a lack not stemming from the technology itself, but rather artificially reinforced (70) by what Enzensberger terms the consciousness industry. 17 With this criticism, he implicitly positions himself as counteracting the technological determinism of popular media critic Marshall McLuhan while at the same time setting himself apart from his fellow German culture media critics Theodor W. Adorno and Max Horkheimer, who, in an earlier study had coined the term culture 17 The essay Das Nullmedium oder Warum alle Klagen ber das Fernsehen gegenstandslos sind (1988), analyzes TV and its function in the consciousness industry more rigorously.

PAGE 33

24 industry. 18 In The Industrialisation of the Mind (1962) Enzensberger takes issue with Adorno and Horkheimers culture industry because it fails to acknowledge that critics of such a system are also products of it. Enzensberger believes that the escape from complete commodification does not lie outside of the system, e.g., in a privileged position of the critics themselves or in avant-garde art as Adorno claims in his Aesthetic Theory, but that resistance must come from within (the medium and the industry). In order to explain the artificiality of radios non-reciprocal function further, Enzensberger argues, the technical distinction between receivers and transmitters reflects the social division of labor into producers and consumers [. .](64). The media industry has a vested interest to keep mass media a one-sided affair, because these media have the primary purpose to sell the existing order, to perpetuate the prevailing pattern of mans domination by man [. .] (Industrialisation 10); in other words, mass media is the life support system of the consciousness industry. Katherine Hayles (1993) complicates and opens up this argument further by pointing out that radio and television may transmit and receive signals, but are unable to act as sites for permanent storage (Virtual Bodies 262). This impermanence allows these media to resist appropriation by a dominant system. Dominant ideology must be continually re-transmitted because, unlike book technology, it is not preserved in a physical and therefore semi-permanent form. Enzensbergers essay investigates how these transmissions are put into practice. What is 18 Max Horkheimer and Theodor Adorno did not share Benjamin and Brechts positive evaluation of mass media technology such as film. They voice harsh criticism in their study The Culture Industry: Enlightenment as Mass Deception which connects mass media to the culture industry. It is important to note, however, that this study was written during and after WWII. Consequently it resonates despair and pessimism as a reaction to the atrocities that had taken place. Film, radio and magazines make up a system which is uniform as a whole and in every part (120) and the universal triumph of the rhythm of mechanical production and reproduction promises that nothing changes, and nothing unsuitable will appear (134) is their response to Benjamin and Brechts engagements with mass media as a potential agent in political and social reform.

PAGE 34

25 especially interesting about his essay is that while he exposes, on the one hand, the artificiality of medias function in society (as transmitters only), on the other, he points out that even those instruments of the media that are functioning ostensibly as two-way apparatuses, for example, the XEROX machine, only allow for participation that remains socially and therefore aesthetically irrelevant (70) due to capitalized ownership and control of the technology. 19 In the age of the cell phone (a radio-like device), the Internet, computer games, CD-ROMs, DVD-ROMs, and all media that invite the spectator/participant to engage in interactive relationships, and at the same time allow for less restrictive access to the technology, this is increasingly a relevant issue. Enzensbergers revisiting of Brechts radio theory, thus can be transposed into the contemporary context. Apart from Brechts emphasis on interactive artistic practices, as outlined in his radio theory, his experiments also include an emphasis on retaining the entertainment value of artistic creations. To some degree interactivity and popular enjoyment already occupy common cultural space in todays realm of the media. Not only do videogames, a favorite pastime for an ever increasing number of people, rely on interactivity to keep players entertained and heighten the fun, but interactivity in general has gained considerable currency in public attitude. In the last couple of decades, interactive experiences have infiltrated all sectors of art and entertainment, high and low, from museum installations and performances to films on DVD and popular television shows. 19 Jean Baudrillard criticizes Enzensbergers concept of radio as a two-way receiver/transmitter sharply by pointing out that if all receivers become transmitters the only thing to be gained is socially irrelevant chatter and not a revolution in the communications structures of mass media (Uecker 43). However, Enzensberger anticipates such criticism with his Xerox remark to qualify that two-way communication must include socially and politically relevant speech acts. As with Brecht, form and content cannot be separated for Enzensberger.

PAGE 35

26 Spectators are invited to become participants in a museum display, explore links related to films stored on DVDs, and vote for their favorite American Idol star on television. As Greg M. Smith points out in On a Silver Platter, contemporary culture views interactivity as a positive media attribute, because it agrees with societys values that regard action as positive and passivity, usually attributed to the media film and television, as negative (10-12). In other words, interactivity is a concept that is easy to sell to todays public, because it coincides with an already present value system. In Brechts time, however, letting the spectators co-mingle with and even replace professional actors and actresses and interact with the playwright was unknown. Passively watching (consuming) a play in the theater was a respected intellectual activity in itself and therefore unlikely to allow for any change in audience status (such as audiences turning into actors). 20 But for Brecht, this attitude belonged to the theater of the previous century and its accompanying bourgeois public sphere. Brechts overall approach was influenced by his progressive attitude toward artistic practices and experiments. 21 He attempted to train people to appreciate and therefore enjoy art through a more complex reception than simply eliciting empathy and agreement with what was shown to them. He explains why he interjects enjoyment into his theatrical productions: [My plays] are a kind of report on life as any member of the audience would like to see it. Since at the same time, however, he sees a good deal he has no wish to see; 20 Blurring the boundaries between professional and amateur acting is experiencing increased popularity right now on so called reality TV programs. However, unlike in Brechts Lehrstck practice, including non-professional actors in these programs stems primarily from a desire to deliver a more life-like, real-seeming product to a public which seems to respond with interest to such misrepresentations. 21 The avant-garde artists also challenged the notion of the passive spectator with their performances and public exchanges. However, following Brgers thesis in Theory of the Avant Garde, their purpose was not to revolutionize the institution of art, as was Brechts aim, but to destroy it.

PAGE 36

27 since therefore he sees his wishes not merely fulfilled but also criticized (sees himself not as the subject but as the object), he is theoretically in a position to appoint a new function for the theatre. (43) This strategy, using the audiences desire for divertissement and then turning it against them, is certainly more prudent, than expecting spectators to understand and like an aesthetic practice to which they can in no way relate. Pleasure, in Brechtian terms, could be divided into two categories, which he differentiated as Genuss and Vergngen. Whereas Genuss is related to passive uncritical consumption, as found in pleasure derived from viewing traditional theater plays, Vergngen points to a productive attitude in the audienceit carries the connotation of expert understanding of the quality and hence the process of production of a play (Mueller 23). When spectators become participants in Brechts Lehrstck, they experience Vergngen through their multifaceted experience (including interaction with the play, the stage and set, the playwright, and the institution as a whole). Part of Vergngen, as well as Brechts progressive political agenda, is the act of inducing in the spectator/participant a sense of alienation, realized in the moment when, through their interactive experience, s/he questions her/his own subject/object status (as a product or reproducer of the dominant system), and subsequently her/his resistance constitutes a political act. If progressive criticism is what Enzensberger calls the readiness to revise all solidified theses, to examine endlessly its own premises and reactionary criticism that which considers itself, so to speak, naturally and everlastingly in the right, exempt from reflecting on its presuppositions (Aporias 18), Brecht undoubtedly practiced the former. He understands that it is not just the technological possibility (the opportunity to interact with the medium) itself that makes media function in a politically responsible

PAGE 37

28 way, but that there must be artistic intervention, didactic interference, and a readiness to discard or violate existing conventions. Brechts artistic undertaking was from the very beginning focused on a radical transformation of an existing institution, the theatre, which was to become part of the ideological superstructure for a solid, practical rearrangement of our ages way of life (Brecht 23). In other words, his Epic Theater could not be divorced from his Marxist ideology. His theories on how to induce audience awareness of a mediums language and willingness to reflect on the mediums institutional make-up, however, can find a broader spectrum of application. This is especially important with media that resist critical spectator interrogations, most notably film and its institutional apparatus, the cinema. But Brechts theories are also applicable in the realm of more recent technological inventions, such as the Internet, CD-ROM, and videogames, where the medium may invite such criticism within its formal set-up but too often simultaneously resists it through its content presentation. 22 Although these media all share a popular place in the sphere of mass media entertainment, this appeal is not destined to thrive off the desire for distraction alone but can be directed toward a more meaningful, Vergngen-like experience. Furthermore, for Brecht, popular entertainment is part of his progressive political stance and used to battle a tradition of banal and escapist distractions. He declares: Popular means intelligible to the broad masses, taking over their own forms of expression and enriching them / adopting and consolidating their standpoint / representing the most progressive section of the people in such a way that it can 22 The mere possibility for interactivity is by no means a guarantee for productive critical inquiries into digital domains. If material that is presented lacks substance, then the experience naturally stays superficial. Some scholars attribute the distance between the simulated and physical life as a limitation on the merits of interactive media. Florian Rtzer, for example, views interactive computer games as media where one constantly sees that which one can neither be nor have (Between Nodes 255). However, I do not see this effect as specific to computer games. TV, films, and books can peddle these desires as well, a feature that advertising companies explore to its fullest.

PAGE 38

29 take over the leadership: thus intelligible to other sections too / linking with tradition and carrying it further / handing on the achievements of the section now leading to the section of the people that is struggling for the lead. (108) Popular does not just apply to that which appeals to the general public, but defines what engages them in the shaping of their own tastes. He declares: Besides being popular there is such a thing as becoming popular (112). In other words, art has a responsibility to make itself accessible not just to an elite part of the population but to as large a segment as possible. Although it was part of the spectators responsibility to acquire taste for such art, it was up to the artist to deliver the goods. As Mueller points out: With the advent of mass culture, film, radio, and television began to take over the function opera had formerly fulfilled. At the same time the consumer attitude developed a double character. While passive consumption is, as Benjamin had pointed out, the attitude of the exploiter, the situation in the case of the mass media is more complex. Exploitation rebounds upon the audience itself. Brecht coined the word inploitation (Einbeutung) for the spectators position, ambivalently split into exploiter and exploited. Brecht sees the audience as the cause and as the victim of a system that divides production and pleasure. This state of affairs has repercussions for both termson the one hand, it marks work and productivity, as devoid of pleasure, and on the other it keeps pleasure free of productivity for the sake of the work. (24) In order to extract the consumer/spectator from this ambivalent position in Einbeutung Brecht developed interactive audience experiences. Productivity in the Epic Theater could again be linked to pleasure as Vergngen. Brechts didactical dimension, manifested in the Lehrstck which aimed at teaching spectators how to critically approach art, can be transposed onto new media practices that incorporate interactivity into their design. Allowing the spectator to become an active participant in the action leads to the participants insights into the construction of meaning in art. In other words, by participating in a play, the spectator gains knowledge about the workings of the theater, the play, and the playwright. By letting an interactive participant define his/her own trajectory, action, and juxtapositions, he/she learns

PAGE 39

30 something about the medium itself, as well as what it means to create a work of art in this medium. The medium is no longer a natural device but emerges contextualized into its institutional, social, and political background. These effects do not occur simply out of the option to interact with the work, but develop out of a specific type of interaction, one that is able to penetrate the surface of the presentation. Introducing opportunities for spectators to interact with an artistic product clearly represents an important tendency that has an obvious political dimension. It not only complicates the notions of author and artwork but also redefines the idea of spectatorship. Making a choice, declares interactive filmmaker Graham Weinbren, involves a moral responsibility. Therefore, for an author to relinquish his/her power to make all choices involves also giving up the responsibility to represent the world and the human condition (Manovich 44). In other words, when audiences are allowed to make choices, a work of art becomes less of a lesson and more of a choice. The didactical dimension of Brechts Epic Theater included precisely such decision making. Interactivity, as Manovich argues, is a confusing term that all to often is defined as a unique feature of digital media. He points out that interactivity is not necessarily a concept that relates exclusively to digital practices, but belongs to a wide spectrum of artistic practice and heritage: All classical, and even more so modern art, was already "interactive" in a number of ways. Ellipses in literary narration, missing details of objects in visual art and other representational shortcuts required the user to fill-in the missing information. Theater, painting and cinema also relied on the techniques of staging, composition and cinematography to orchestrate viewer's attention over time, requiring her to focus on different parts of the display. With sculpture and architecture, the viewer had to move her whole body to experience the spatial structure. (56)

PAGE 40

31 This complex physical and cognitive interplay between spectator and art was intensified, continues Manovich, with new narrative techniques, such as film montage, abstraction in visual art, interactive happenings, as well as performance and installation art (56-57). Brechts Epic Theater obviously constitutes another important forerunner to digital interactive media practices, especially because it often combined cognitive and physical interactivity into one practice. In Schaustcke such as Mother Courage and Her Children the spectator is not given a figure with whom to identify easily, as Mother Courage represents a complicated, fluctuating character with changing moral convictions. Each scene that presents her in a different light requires an adjustment in the audiences attitude, leading to active interaction with the provoking material. These types of character complexities are part of Brechts technique of Verfremdung, which is concerned with the alienation of the familiar, a process that interrupts the smooth flow of narrative to prompt the audience to reflect on rather than simply consume what is presented. 23 The audience becomes actively involved with the play by conjuring up in its own mind other types of behavior and situations, and, in accordance with the events on stage, will hold them up in comparison with those presented by the theater. Therefore, the audience itself turns into a storyteller (Brecht GW 924). 24 In addition to producing alienation through plot and acting, Brecht interrupted the dramatic action of his Schaustcke with songs and 23 This term was first used in an essay in 1936, Brecht used the term Entfremdung in his previous writing. 24 All references to Brecht refer to John Willetts translations in Brecht on Theatre, except when GW is noted, by which is meant Bertolt Brecht Gesammelte Werke 16 Schriften zum Theater 2. With these references I will use my own translation. In the original: Damit auf spielerische Weise das Besondere der vom Theater vorgebrachten Verhaltungweisen und Situationen herauskommt und kritisiert warden kann, dichtet das Publikum im Geist andere Verhandlungsweisen und Situationen hinzu und hlt sie, der Handlung folgend, gegen die vom Theater vorgebrachten. Somit verwandelt sich das Publikum selber in einen Erzhler.

PAGE 41

32 placards, film projections and other technical devices commenting on the action on stage rather than repeating or emphasizing its message. The Lehrstck, however exceeds the Schaustcks potential, because it incorporated interactivity to such a degree that spectator and performer merge as one. Even if the play did not physically include all spectators in the performance, Brecht involved them in other ways, such as having the audience complete questionnaires or engage in discussions, the outcomes of which Brecht used to rewrite the plays (Mueller 32, 38, 106). Again, central to Brechts epic theory was the idea that interactivity equaled enjoyment for the participant, what the spectator, anyway the experienced spectator, enjoys about art is the making of art, the active creative element (164). This correlation between interactivity and entertainment is one of the basic ingredients of the commercial success of videogames. It is also applied with outstanding results to other areas of arts and entertainment resulting in hypertext fiction, web design, online museum exhibits, multi-player online games, Net.art, interactive installations and performances, MUDs (Multi User Dungeons) and MOOs (Multi User Dungeons Object-Oriented), DVD-Videos, video (with its instant replay), and pedagogical applications. 25 In the latter, the didactic relevance of interactivity has gained much attention, because learners appear to respond well to the multi-modal and active approach to learning. Inferring from the results of a variety of empirical studies involving interactive materials, Larry Friedlander observes, this technology invites us to embrace process, to enjoy the journey as much as 25 Thomas Elsaesser argues that interactivity with narratives often means hyperselectivity instead. Due to limited computing power (in regard to both speed and artificial intelligence) choices are limited and preprogrammed by the author, therefore espousing a you can go wherever you like, so long as I have been there before (Digital Cinema 217) logic. However, this is not entirely true for all interactive narratives, because it does not address those that use algorithms, which make unlimited scenarios possible.

PAGE 42

33 the goal. Because it asks its users to intervene with their own choices and opinions, it can challenge authority and help deconstruct received, standard forms of knowledge (174). 26 Here, as in Brechts plays, the importance of process over goals is stressed which highlights that such materials and practices do not favor dogmatism. Although trying to reach a wide audience, and therefore incorporating pleasure into his texts, Brecht avoided dazzling his audience with stage productions that tried to efface or naturalize the tools which were part of the performances. In the Schaustck, where he was not able to integrate the spectator physically into the action on stage, he had to rely on other techniques to achieve his alienation effect (Verfremdungseffekt). This effect is achieved through acts of distanciation, e.g., transferring a familiar event, character, or technique into an unfamiliar context, and incorporated a variety of epic techniques, including the use of technology on stage. The purpose of the V-Effekt was to make audiences question what they saw on stage, to let material appear constructed rather than natural. The V-Effekt was predominantly accomplished through separating individual aesthetic and formal elements from one another, e.g., setting off music from speech, film projections from stage set, acting from being the character, historical events from current ones, etc. By separating individual elements and interrupting the flow of the presentation, materials and techniques became visible as constructed (as unnatural). Brecht made his epic tools visible; he created a hyper-mediated environment which the audience was encouraged to see as such. 26 These interactive learning environments, including Brechts Epic Theater, are related to principles of constructivism and constructionism which rely on theories of Dewey, Piaget, and Papert. Constructivism and constructionism postulate that learners construct meaning by actively engaging with materials, through building, creating, and reflecting. However, all three behavioral scientists developed their ideas after Brecht had already formulated some of his basic epic theories.

PAGE 43

34 Hypermediation In direct opposition to a hyper-presence of mediation, such as in Brechts case, stands effacement of the physical worlda simulated realitymade possible via the disappearance of any mediating agent in interactions with media simulations, virtual reality objects representing the most dramatic case. This ostensible transparency, which Bolter and Grusin term immediacy affords the viewer or participant a sense of having an authentic experience. Hypermediacy, in contrast to immediacy, exposes the fact that all knowledge is transmitted through a medium. Hence the viewer or participant realizes that her/his experience is transmitted through a filter (70-71). The authors discuss such concepts of mediation in detail in their book Remediation. Understanding New Media. Remediation, for Bolter and Grusin, is the act of representation of one medium in another (45). 27 However, whereas some media acknowledge their indebtedness to rivaling forms of representation, others try to present themselves as pure and objective mediators of reality. Remediation describes all media as engaging in a constant remediation of rivalry media forms, incorporating aspects of each other and demonstrating their improvements upon one another, that is, their transparency. It is Bolter and Grusins categories of hypermediation, which they define as style of visual representation whose goal is to remind the viewer of the medium (272) and immediacy as a style [. .] whose goal is to make the viewer forget the presence of the medium and believe that he is in the presence of the real (272-3), which I will adapt in my argument regarding the practice of audience interaction (in its multitude of meanings) with digital 27 When Benjamin emphasizes how Epic Theater, rather than competing against new media, uses these media to learn from them, in short to enter into a debate with them (The Author 266), he is describing a principle of remediation.

PAGE 44

35 and non-digital epic presentations. However, it is important to establish that Bolter and Grusin see hypermediacy as just another form of immediacy, a desire to be in the presence of the real, by turning it into a fascination with the medium (122). For example, in television news broadcasting, giving the viewer visual access to the areas of production that often remain obscured in cinema, such as camera equipment, microphones, etc, the viewer is tempted to see the coverage of news as direct access to real events; because the medium shows its mediating elements it is again immediate in transmission of knowledge and experience. Video and film also constitute excellent examples for this theory. While video recordings, in contrast to 35mm film, include tell-tale signs of the recording medium, such as graininess, unsteadiness of image, and easier access to hard-to-record sources (only accessible with compact equipment), at the same time the very fact that the medium exposes itself convinces the viewer that s/he is accessing the real. 28 Likewise, 35mm film, which imitates natural sight, shows its recorded material ostensibly unmediated and therefore also remediates the real. On the other hand, the smoothness of transitions, the clarity of image, etc. could also be interpreted as hyper-stylized, and hence hypermediated, therefore not real, etc.. 29 Of 28 With 16mm film, steady-cams, digital film cameras, and other recording technology that blur the formal and aesthetic boundaries between video and film this comparison becomes less persuasive. 29 While many critics claim that filmmakers employ new media technologies, especially in the form of digital special effects, primarily to produce mimetic representations of physical reality, I would argue that this is often not the case. On the contrary, if images can be obtained in physical reality, there is a tendency to attain them traditionally, that is, through a lens-based recording device and stored on celluloid. Michael Allen, for example, sites the film Jurassic Park to substantiate this common claim. He asserts, digital imaging technologies and techniques are striving to replicate what already exists: the photographic representation of reality (110) However, especially in the case of Jurassic Park this motivation for using digital effects seems doubtful. While filmmakers certainly aim to make there creations seem realistic, they are not interested in convincing audiences that they are. Dinosaurs are not part of our physical reality nor will they ever be again (and they probably never existed in the form that they assume in the film either). This is an accepted fact for filmmaker and audiences alike. This also applies to scenes that are digitally created or enhanced to show protagonists performing impossible stunts or allow views of catastrophes that could not be filmed safely from that perspective. What digital technologies make possible in Jurassic Park

PAGE 45

36 course, neither immediacy nor hypermediacy can grant access to an objective, unfettered reality, because no such state exists. In all cases, with video, television, and film, the yearning for authentic experiences serves as the foundation for this paradox. Although this all-encompassing quest for immediacy of all media is hard to contradict, hypermediacy and immediacy nonetheless operate in degrees and not in absolutes. Every medium encompasses not only the technological ability to transmit knowledge and experience but also includes an institutionalized logic that guides its transmissions. In hypermediacy, it is possible to separate, even if only for the purpose of critique, the medium from the institution that legitimizes its use in society and, in turn, approach the result as a moment during which it becomes more likely to make observations and collect insights concerning the mediums institutional constructedness, its ideological framework. Whereas immediacy, achieved without hypermediation, sees the path to the truth or the real as unfettered and natural, immediacy produced via hypermediacy displays it as a path with obstacles, and involving an agent (and therefore agency), thus rendering it much more suspect. 30 Therefore, hypermediacy can provide an opportunity for viewers and participants to penetrate what Enzensberger calls the consciousness industry (only in theory a closed system) which unaided immediacy cannot. Enzensberger explains that in order for the consciousness industry to exist four condition have to be fulfilled: 1) receivers must believe themselves to have an and other films laden with digital effects is to bring to life the non-existent and fantastic. Digital technologies are able to expand the vocabulary and arsenal of subject matter used in filmmaking to include that which cannot exist in physical reality. 30 Foregrounding the medium as a means to achieve hypermediacy is not necessarily meaningful in itself as was once thought to be true (for example, in certain instances of the French New Wave film practice) as Nora Alter argues in Projecting History.

PAGE 46

37 autonomous mind (in the hypermediacy/immediacy paradox this translates into the receivers belief that s/he possesses the capacity to see the real), 2) human rights, equality, liberty, etc. must be proclaimed (not realized) (this corresponds to the mediums affirmation [not realization] of providing access to the real), 3) a high standard of education must be available to all (viewers must have a general media-savvyness that leads them to believe they have the capacity to separate real from mediated), and 4) a high level of sophistication in technology must be present (the medium must posses the tools to be able to bring the real into the viewers living room) (Industrialization 7-9). Because the consciousness industry feeds off the conditions that allow it to exist, including critique and awareness of its function and workings, its system is nearly self-perpetuating and sealed off to interference. Nonetheless, because the industry incorporates hypermediacy as well as immediacy into its whole it also invites challenges to its system. Enzensberger explains: The mind industry has a dynamic of its own which it cannot arrest, and it is not by chance but by necessity that in this movement there are currents which run contrary to its present mission of stabilizing the status quo. A corollary of its dialectical progress is that the mind industry, however closely supervised in its individual operations, is never completely controllable as a whole. There are always leaks in it, cracks in the armor; no administration will ever trust it all the way. (13) To bring Enzensbergers media analysis back into the context of Bolter and Grusins observations, it is necessary to identify hypermediacy as the moment where leakage can occur. It is in hypermediacy that the medium is most vulnerable, because it is exposing its institutional make-up, its constructedness based on convention, and its desire to reinforce societys status quo, thus threatening to undermine all four of Enzensbergers conditions. Lets return for a moment to Brechts media project and analyze hypermediacy in the context of Epic Theater. Brechtian theater presentations included materials and

PAGE 47

38 techniques (acts, new media, acting, music, etc.) that were employed very differently from the Aristotelian theater. Instead of merging elements into the play seamlessly, in order to create the illusion of being part of a natural setting, Brecht opted for a presentation in which elements drew attention to themselves as artifacts. 31 Homogeneity on stage was replaced by heterogeneity. This heterogeneity made it possible for the audience and the actors to experience Verfremdung, a crucial step in achieving critical reception. The separation of parts was, for one, applied to the plays narrative structure to achieve a very specific purpose, as Brecht explains: As we cannot invite the audience to fling itself into the story as it were a river and let itself be carried vaguely hither and thither, the individual episodes have to be knotted together in such a way that the knots are easily noticed. The episodes must not succeed one another indistinguishable but must give us a chance to interpose our judgment. [. .] The parts of the story have to be carefully set off one against another by giving each its own structure as a play within the play (201). In revealing their construction (as individual elements comprising a whole), episodes allow for the spectator to interject her or himself into the action and interpret the structure itself as an important component for meaning to emerge. The epic play allows for the audience to agree as well as disagree with its presentation of events. Additionally, the hypermediated environment attracts a reading of events beyond the narration itself and invites instead to include in a reading the conditions for such narration to take place (such as institutional restraints, genre convention, and ideological goals). Separation of elements in Epic Theater also applies to the set and its materials. This Verfremdungs-effect emerges most clearly on the stage of the Lehrstck. Technology 31 Brechts chief criticism of Richard Wagners Gesamtkunstwerk is based on precisely this concept which uses the separation of elements in Epic Theatre and opposes its formal logic to the process of fusion in the Gesamtkunstwerk (37-38).

PAGE 48

39 played a crucial role in achieving the critical distancing of the Lehrstck performer to the material that s/he performed. New media, such as film strips and radio, aided in the alienation of the performer from the subject matter of the play, both during the performance and afterward. While performing, the actors were confronted by, what Brecht called a new, gigantic actor that helped to narrate events, and the stage took up an attitude itself towards the incidents shown. The new media film and radio, were treated as separate entities, not simply used to enhance the effect of speech and acting. The media, exhibited as anthropomorphized elements, produced moments of alienation for actors and audience. 32 Through this technique, the performers were motivated to critically reflect on the new means of representation. Thus, media, such as film and the radio, which were used primarily to advance commercial and state interests had been changed, umfunktioniert, into media able to convey socio-political insights. Film as a recording device could also be used as a medium for preserving the Lehrstck performance for later study. This re-experiencing of the material and performance from an external viewpoint would lead to further critical distance and reflection. In addition to presenting the parts of the plot and technological devices as separate elements, Brecht also used a technique of acting and a presentation of music that achieved Verfremdung. Again, in both cases, Epic Theater would not tolerate immediacy. The professional as well as amateur performers were trained to expose their distance to the material they presented rather than to smooth over the boundaries between actor and 32 Samuel Beckett employs this Brechtian anthropomorphizing technique of technology quite literally in his one-act, one-character play Krapps Last Tape. In this play Krapp listens to tapes which he has recorded as a younger man. The tape-recorder and the cassettes it plays take on the function of an independent character as the audience cannot reconcile the younger Krapp on the tapes and the man listening to them to be the same person. Krapp has changed so much, he himself does not recognize the person he once was. Actor, character, and audience all experienced the tape-recorder and tapes as that new gigantic actor.

PAGE 49

40 character. Thus, the audience was not encouraged to see the character on stage as a point for identification. On the contrary, the characters were there to be critically analyzed. Music and singing were treated similarly. In the case of singing, Brecht demanded a specific attitude from his performers: Nothing is more revolting than when the actor pretends not to notice that he has left the level of plain speech and started to sing. The three levelsplain speech, heightened speech and singingmust always remain distinct and in no case should heightened speech represent an intensification of plain speech, or singing of heightened speech. In no case therefore should singing take place where words are prevented by excess of feeling. The actor must not only sing but show a man singing. (44-45) Accompanying music also had to follow the principle of separation and set itself off from the action as a commentary on rather than an enhancement of the events portrayed. In sum, Brecht achieved critical distancing of the audience and actors toward the performance through viewer participation as well as alienation (Verfremdung). Verfremdung (through hypermediation) replaced empathy (an element of immediacy), an audience reaction which belongs to the Aristotelian theater. Both forms of distancing, alienation and viewer participation, are achieved in the contemporary technologies of video and digital media through hypermediation as well. In the case of the most popular branch of the Internet, the World Wide Web, hypertext is one of the technologies that offers both a distancing of the material through the intervention of the medium (in the form of separate links, windows, applications) and through the interaction with and manipulation of the material presented. Gregory Ulmer notes that in hypermedia, the scholar does not provide a specific line of argument, an enunciation, but constructs the whole paradigm of possibilities, the set of statements, leaving the act of utterance, specific selections and combinations, to the reader/user (Grammatology). This presentation of argument and invitation for interaction deviates

PAGE 50

41 considerably from authors and critics practices with printed texts. George Landow, in his important study of hypertext, has pointed out some of the potential political dimensions of hypertext use. He argues that dominant discourses do not necessarily dominate in hypertext due to a lack of textual centrality as well as stemming from a marginality in the organization of material. He remarks: Hypertext emphasizes that the marginal has as much to offer as does the central, (89) whereas "linearity of print provides the passage with an illusory center" (98); a center, of course, is always linked to a position of power, a center of power. Through its webbed structure, hyperlinks eradicate hierarchies of meaning. Landow also points out that hypertext promotes the organization of arguments set up as juxtapositions and using appropriations of other works to supplement ones own (170-71). In other words, hypertext does not rely on normative argumentation but favors a dynamic and multi-perspectivist presentation of views. 33 This type of argumentation fits well within the frame of Brechts theory. Like hypertext, Epic Theater is essentially dynamic; its task is to show the world as it changes (and also how it may be changed) (Brecht 79), and copyright was never a concern of Brechts. However, it must be pointed out that commodification of the Internet is well under way. 34 What once served almost exclusively as a forum for the public (and initially the military) has become a successful commercial space. Therefore, the potentially democratizing features of hypertextual 33 Hypermediacy is not necessarily a component of computer environments per se. On the contrary, Friedrich Kittler argues in There is No Software, that the computer industry is trying hard to disguise hardware and software to keep the user in the dark about their tools, to hide a whole machine from its user (334). Often, it is at the level of interface, the intersection that connects user to machine, where these deceptions take place. 34 Enzensberger would argue that critical intervention can only address this issue from within the medium, by using the medium to subvert its appropriation by capitalism.

PAGE 51

42 application can also be identified as useful vehicles for commercial ventures. 35 Apart from the actual language used on the WWW (e.g., hypertext mark-up language), the interactivity necessary to navigate this highly mediated space, as well as the foregrounding of the constructedness of the presentation, making visible its individual elements and its institutionally (commercial and otherwise) reinforced conventions, achieves the critical distance, the Verfremdung, that Brecht found necessary to all understanding (71). Hypermediation was, after all, a key feature of Epic Theater as well. Digital media, in general, can be linked closely to Brechts technique of separating elements to achieve hypermediacy in his Epic Theater. As Manovich points out, all digital objects rely on the logistics of modularity. Media elements, when assembled into a larger project, retain their separate identity apart from the project. These elements also have the advantage of being stored separately, therefore are able to be manipulated without affecting anything else in the meta-project. Even computer programming relies on modularity, because it is composed of independent, small modules which are assembled to function as a larger program (30-31). 36 This principle can be observed in any multimedia presentation. For example, in a CD-ROM application, created with Macromedia Director, which includes sounds, still images, and video-clips, these individual elements cannot only be accessed separately on the CD (by everyone) but also 35 There are also instances where commercial spaces have been reclaimed as spheres of non-commercial activity, as Andrew Feenberg points out in Questioning Technology. He calls this a subversive rationalization of commercial technologies. This act of democratic technological change can lead to genuine subversion. Feenberg cites the Minitel videotext system in France as an example. Viewers transformed this informational technology into an interactive network. Thanks to the Minitel thousands of people connect for purposes never intended by its creators, as a source for organizing political protests as well as for forming sexual connections (cited in Light). 36 However, Manovich also mentions an important difference between the modularity of new media objects and computer programming. Whereas in the former the independent elements can be removed without harming the larger structure, in the latter such a removal would crash the program (31).

PAGE 52

43 rearranged, deleted, or otherwise manipulated (provided one has the original file and the software to do so) without changing any other part of the presentation. The separation of elements is even more obvious in Web pages, where not only images, sounds, and videos are separately stored and accessible, but where each page is an individual element as well, in some cases not even created by the original author but produced by someone else and presented as an external link. The Internet and CD-ROMs are not the only media environments that foster hypermediated interactive experiences. Interactive installations and performances also make use of these principles. These hypermediated and interactive art forms can trace their history back at least as far as to Brechts own time. 37 However, it was not until the 1960s that they experienced a surge in artist and audience appeal. The invention of video and later computer technologies allowed performers to augment their acts and enhance their installations. These technologies infused performance and installation art with hypermediation and interactivity simultaneously. The once expected passive role of the art observer was no longer the dominant position for viewing and experimenting art. In the realm of literature, an aesthetic practice not usually associated with interactivity, Roland Barthes had already complicated the notion that the texts meaning resides with the author alone. Instead a 'writerly textuality emerges, by which is meant that the reader does not encounter a work with a set meaning, but rather writes and re-writes the text through interpretation, which replaces the construct of the artist as genius, as 37 Kurt Schwitterss Merzbau (1923-1943), also called "The Cathedral of Erotic Misery," constitutes an early example of an interactive installation. The Merzbau was made up of a combination of collage, sculpture, and architecture. It began in 1923 with a small construction in a corner of the artist's studio, a room within his apartment. The project eventually extended over many of the areas of his apartment. He, his family, and his friends interacted on a daily basis with this construction since it also represented their living space. Left unfinished when Schwitters fled Hannover in early 1937, the Merzbau was completely destroyed during an Allied bombing raid in 1943.

PAGE 53

44 creator of the work (Death). 38 This textuality is enhanced by a new active form of spectatorship, but at the same time dependent on the degree and type of interactivity built into the installation or performance. Nevertheless, these forms of artistic works subvert the artists claim of autonomy over her/his creation, once thought to be an integral part of the artwork. The spectators interactive experience repositions her/him into the role of co-creator. As in the Lehrstck, spectator and artist/playwright work collaboratively to complete the artwork/play. For Epic Theater, artistic autonomy was never an issue, any such claims would have rendered the performance, in the case of the Schauspiel as well as the Lehrstck, innocuous. Another new media hypermediated space can be found in multi player online game and chat environments, such as MUDs and MOOs, as well as multi-player computer games, such as Everquest and Sims Online. Sherry Turkle has performed extensive research involving these types of role-playing games, especially those involving MUDs. In her findings she reports that role-playing games, a popular use of MUDs, function as psychologically constructive vehicles, not just a release from the reality found in the physical world (as in immediacy) (Constructions 358). This is obviously an important observation, because it stands in stark contrast to common criticisms describing virtual spaces as harbors of escape from the problems encountered in the world. Turkles overall assessment highlights the computer as a medium that provokes negotiations of categories that usually are experienced as natural, such as gender, identity, free will, intelligence, life, etc. (362). It is her assessment finally, that in the hypermediated environments of MUDs old questions are raised in new contexts and there is an opportunity for fresh 38 Interestingly, in The Death of the Author, Barthes explicitly connects his arguments concerning the diminishing of the authors importance to the text as an act of Brechtian distanciation (145).

PAGE 54

45 resolutions (364). This recalls Brechts principle of alienation and his conviction that subverting conventions can ultimately lead to changing social conditions. But hypermediacy is also applicable to video and film, albeit in a limited manner. As already mentioned, video can be used in such a way as to highlight the recording medium, through motion and resolution. It can also appear embedded in a film and be set off as separate through its technological specificity. Film, on the other hand, traditionally works hard to erase its own production process and appear as a reflection of reality. Its immediacy, however, is dependent on convention, rather than technology. There are plenty of techniques that can be employed to highlight films artificial nature. One such technique is the physical manipulation of film stock to jolt the viewer into acknowledging the apparatus. Examples for this are Valie Exports The Practice of Love (1984) and Richard Linklaters Waking Life (2001). In the former, a character within the film text makes a slashing motion and the director translates this fictional move into a physical cutting of the film stock where this sequence is stored. In the case of Waking Life a proprietary software was used to manipulate the images of live-action footage to transform them into a cartoonish version of the actual recordings. In both cases the filmmakers do not work with the medium (technological and institutional make-up, convention, commodification, etc.) but against it. Although film and video are not classic examples for hypermediated texts, they are not inherently hostile to hypermediation, but rather have evolved to be used and regarded as remediating the real. The Expressionismus Debatte (in which Brecht took part) in the nineteen thirties and, in its wake, similar discussions concerning modern culture have as their central

PAGE 55

46 concern artistic expressions and their (im)possibility for intervention in the real. 39 The original debate, which tried to establish once and for all the function, form and significance of art within society, has become a hotly debated issue again in the context of new media forms and technologies. Apart from the continued obsession with the real, what connects the inauguration of the last century with that of the present is the radical transformation of cultural production and representations made possible by new technologies. Bill Nichols draws on these common characteristics in his essay The Work of Culture in the Age of Cybernetic Systems, where he not only connects the art of reproduction, whether mechanical or digital, to an altered concept of reality, but also to new identity formations: My intention, in fact, is to carry Benjamins inquiry forward and to ask how cybernetic systems, symbolized by the computer, represent a set of transformations in our conception of and relation to self and reality of a magnitude commensurate with the transformations in the conception of and relation to self and reality wrought by mechanical reproduction and symbolized by the camera. (121) However, according to Nichols, the difference between [mechanical and digital reproduction] is being able to remake the world and being able to efface it (131), where the latter has obvious political disadvantages to the former. Although I do not share Nicholss bleak impressions of digital corollaries in the remainder of the essay, I do believe that effacement of artificiality is a problem that must be reckoned with in any digital representation (simulation), hence my argument that hypermediation has more potential as a critical stimulant. 40 39 See footnote 1 for details on this debate. 40 Nichols updates Enzensbergers consciousness industry thesis from 30 years earlier (without mentioning him, however) to the age of cybernetics when he states that just as the mechanical reproduction of copies revealed the power of industrial capitalism to reorganize and reassemble the world around us, rendering it as commodity art, the automated intelligence of chips reveals the power of postindustrial capitalism to simulate and replace the world around us, rendering not only its exterior realm but also its interior ones of

PAGE 56

47 Brechtian Theory and Recent Developments in the Public Sphere While Brechtian techniques, implementing interactivity and hypermediacy into Epic Theory, are particularly important to any epic practice in the realm of contemporary technology, his attempts at transforming the public sphere with his aesthetic practice must also be regarded as a forerunner for contemporary practices. The notion of a public sphere as a formative space for communicative exchanges in society can be used to follow a particularly dynamic history within the German context. In Strukturwandel der ffentlichkeit, Jrgen Habermas traces the formation of a public sphere (ffentlichkeit), a utopian space independent of state, commercial interests, and the realm of the immediate family, to the eighteenth century European Enlightenment project. This sphere, in theory, would grant access to all citizens (at least those that are white and male) who would in turn honor and further the principles of open rational debate, work toward the welfare of the public, and ensure equality for all participants. In the eighteenth century, according to Habermas, the newspapers (along with salons, literary societies, and discussion groups) were the primary spaces for the realization of ffentlichkeit. However, today a combination of media, such as newspapers, magazines, radio, and television have taken the once uncontested place of the newspaper press to construct a 20 th -century public sphere. According to Habermas, this has had devastating effects on the public sphere project because rather than realizing the above named principles, the new media are corrupted by commercial and state interests and thus no longer function consciousness, intelligence, thought and intersubjectivity as commodity experience (131). Although he does not address the role of the critic of such a system as a potential violator of the systems logic, he still sees a chance to transgress its predefined interdiction and limits, using the dynamite of the apperceptive powers it has itself brought into being (143) (just as Enzensberger does in Industrialisation), but does not comment on who or what the agent in such an explosion might be. Another interesting aspect of Nicholss analysis is his hypothesis that the preservation and propagation of ideology has in the digital age primarily shifted to the judicial apparatus.

PAGE 57

48 independently from such influences. For Habermas, this corruption has led to a refeudalization (233) (a state prior to Enlightenment) of the public sphere, therefore reflecting public authority but not truly representing it. Habermas would like to return to the Enlightenment project ideal of ffentlichkeit, but rather than having individuals representing themselves he proposes that those individuals form organizations of democratically structured interest groups (such as political parties, or civil organizations). In an effort to update Habermass concept of the public sphere to better fit into an age of mass media and media convergences, Oskar Negt and Alexander Kluge published their Public Sphere and Experience (1972), ten years after Habermass Strukturwandel. Their thesis of the public sphere is based upon what they see as its primary material, the concept of experience. However, experience is not a product of individuals but something that can only emerge as a cooperative action (52) resulting from public discussions. Therefore, the public sphere simultaneously represents the space where experience is gathered and needs this experience in order to function. If this circle cannot be completed, the public sphere becomes an empty and useless space. Negt and Kluge further argue that Habermass bourgeois public sphere operated on a principle of exclusion and separation (it was only accessible to certain social groups and split categories that are culturally intermeshed) and set forth the notion of a more inclusive and fluent public sphere (or multiple spheres). Private experience is now part of the public domain. The public sphere should be analyzed according to the degree and type of social experience that is included in it. This experience can either be put to use as fuel for the dominant powers that shape the public sphere or become a liberating power within its reign.

PAGE 58

49 Negt and Kluges study was unquestionably informed by Brechts ideas on the shaping of a public sphere. As Mueller remarks: When Brecht embarked on the sociological experiment, the public trial over the filming of his Threepenny Opera, he was fixing a moment in the process of shifting public spheres, a moment in which we can see the public spheres of production in the making. At the same time, Brecht was keen on exposing the ideal categories of the classical bourgeois public sphere as ideology. (122-3) In exposing the ideological backbone of the bourgeois public sphere, Brechts theory set itself apart from the Habermasian project and aligns itself more closely with Negt and Kluges ideas. For Brecht, as for Negt and Kluge, it was imperative to wrest the means of communication from the apparatus and place it in the hands of the artists themselves (123). 41 In our current state of technology the public sphere has been changed dramatically yet again. In addition to film and television, there are other media vying to take their place among constituents of the public sphere, such as video, the Internet, and various new technologies of distribution. Collectively, they can no longer describe a coherent, homogenous public sphere. Instead, each one incorporates and often exposes freely the different ideological practices in its make-up and is used in a myriad of ways, both to strengthen and undermine dominant discourses. Video is the most obvious example of a seemingly democratizing medium, in a position to open up the public sphere to various groups and individuals (for example, in the form of guerilla television). In the early years of video proliferation, its potential, based on the mediums versatility and low cost, was seen as a way to turn everyone into an artist, in a true Brechtian and Benjaminian sense, and thus create an alternative public sphere which could counteract the dominant one. 41 Kluge does this in his television shows that categorically subvert all categories set up by dominant television practice and commercial interests. See chapter 3 for a more detailed account of these programs.

PAGE 59

50 Unfortunately, these utopian ideals never came to pass, although various promising attempts were made (see chapter 3). Presently, digital video is in the process of replacing analog video almost completely. Whether this new medium will be able to fulfill the promise of its predecessor is not yet clear. The various computer technologies, including digital video, incorporate some very interesting prospects for a changed public sphere. As Lunenfeld points out, the computer becomes an instrument unique in the history of audiovisual mediafor the first time the same machine serves as the site of production, distribution and reception (71). Implicit in this statement is the notion that computers make it possible to collapse several public and private domains into the same physical but also cultural sphere. Digital cultural artifacts are often created in a private setting, then distributed through a network that can neither be defined clearly as private nor public nor wholly commercial (the Internet). They finally arrive, again, in the same private setting in which they originated without having undergone much in the way of institutional manipulation. A good example for this kind of slippery cultural exchange is the peer-to-peer file-sharing service Kazaa. With the help of Kazaa millions of people trade files with a myriad of contents, including music, videos, images, recordings of lectures, e-books, and a wide variety of digital curiosities. Although Kazaa is a commercial enterprise itself, it subverts all conventional categories of pecuniary systems since it allows its users to share copyrighted materials rather than purchase and sell the items. It also allows groups and individuals to trade their personal recordings and therefore circumvent traditionally set up cultural and commercial spheres. These cultural and commercial systems, now part of the public sphere, often permit only a limited amount of material to enter into their ranks and admit only those which support,

PAGE 60

51 not undermine, its internal structure. Kazaa has more than 60 million users around the world, and its users share over 15 million files a month (Woody). Also, Kazaa is only one of several peer-to-peer file sharing services, increasing the total number of shared files by multiples of 10-100. However, commercial forces are working hard to undermine the success of such public services. 42 Napster, a similar file sharing utility which operated based on a different technical principle (it indexed songs on its own server rather than simply acting as a node connecting users in the Kazaa fashion), was shut down by courts in 2000 based on charges of copyright infringements. In the cornucopia of new media there exist plenty more examples for practices that complicate the conceptualization of the public sphere for our contemporary society. These include practices that I have already mentioned throughout this chapters, which incorporate interactivity and hypermediacy into their logic. Brecht was an important precursor for the expansion of the public sphere to include alternate practices that undermine dominant ideology. Conclusion: Brecht after BrechtContinuations and Transgressions Brechts media theory has survived a myriad of technical advancements and has been called upon as fuel for disparate media movements. A detailed account of this continuing Brechtian legacy is given elsewhere, a brief summary of the major points will therefore suffice. 43 In the 1960s and 1970s, Brechts theories were not only adapted to theater productions but also became infused into film criticism. Brecht was particularly 42 In Kazaas case it is particularly difficult to make a legal case stick, because the company is as decentralized as its service. Its servers are located in Denmark, the software in Estonia, the domain is registered in Australia, and the corporation itself is housed on an island in the South Pacific (Woody). 43 Mueller gives a thorough account of Brechtian influences on various national and historical scenes. She describes the case of France, Britain, and Germany up to the 1980s in detail.

PAGE 61

52 influential for the French New Wave movement, most notably for Jean-Luc Godard, and defined a line of film criticism that bore fruit in the British film journal Screen (predominantly through Colin MacCabe, Stephen Heath, and Ben Brewster). 44 This latter development led to a contentious debate whether it was in sync with a Brechtian approach to infuse Freudian/Lacanian psychoanalysis into the mix. Mueller notes that it was predominantly the confusion of terminology, in particular the confusing use of the term separation with its opposing meanings in Brechtian and Lacanian theories, which fueled the debate (112, 114). Other British critics, such as Martin Walsh, used Brechtian ideas to develop a theory of counter-cinema. In the context of German artistic development, Brecht had the most impact on the New German Cinema movement. As Mueller remarks: Formally, Brecht is ubiquitous in New German Cinema (123). The most obvious examples for Brechtian cinema are the films of Alexander Kluge and Rainer Werner Fassbinder. Although the legacy of Brechts work weaves itself through several different national contexts, what all of the critics and filmmakers who have built this legacy share is their enthusiasm for an artistic and theoretical practice that has burst through its own historical and national specificity. Turkle, author of several works dealing with new media, points out that certain theories, for example, psychoanalysis, have a degree of appropriability, which allows people to adapt them as an object to think with and about issues that concern culture at large (Psychoanalytic xxvi). I agree with this claim and contend that this can also be applied to Brechts Epic Theater. So far 44 MacCabe more or less initiated this debate with his article Realism and the Cinema: Notes on Some Brechtian Theses, published by the film journal Screen in 1974. In this article he drew on the ideas of the Bertolt Brecht to develop a critique of the relationship between narrative systems, discursive hierarchies, and the reproduction of dominant ideology (52). He focused on the structure of what he called the classic realist text which uses a metalanguage, void of contradictions, and supportive of dominant ideology, and denies its own status as mediating reality. These devices of epistemic privileging subdued any attempt of active, critical spectatorship.

PAGE 62

53 Brecht has only been adapted to act in the service of film and radio theory, but I believe other areas of cultural and aesthetic productions can also benefit from his theories. As I have demonstrated, there exist a number of mediated spaces in the cornucopia of digital and analog worlds where Brechtian tactics of alienation, interaction, and construction can lead to productive interactive experiences and their assessments. Although most of Brechts theoretical writings are concerned with the artistic practices of the stage, he also applied his epic strategies to other media such as radio and film. I am following this approach in my attempt to formulate a general media theory that takes Brecht as its point of departure. However, I do not propose utilizing Brechts specific techniques of his Epic Theater and adapting them without mutation to the new media discussed in this study. The new technologies have made certain techniques obsolete. The theater represents a very distinct medium with technological and institutional particularities and therefore resists certain analogies with the cinema and other media institutions. Adapting epic strategies also necessarily involves recontextualizing Brechts specific methods into the changed socio-political and economic background of the late 20 th and beginning 21 st century. Although there is a perceptible correlation between Brechts and the current time period, especially in terms of technological developments, other corresponding categories do not fit as neatly. Therefore it is not only important to adapt Brechts theater methods to fit other media but it is also important to update his theory to correlate with the contemporary historical context. The examples in the following chapters, mainly Wenders, Tykwer, and Export, all illustrate some of the Brechtian ideas explained aboveon the level of the works themselves as well as in the applied criticism. The new and old media objects on which I

PAGE 63

54 focus my attention sustain a tradition of formal considerations that are clearly linked to Brechts experiment launched in the last century. New media, and old media which incorporate the new, therefore are not as new as one might expect, they continue an aesthetic, social, and political trajectory instituted by predecessors. Nonetheless, the specific outcomes of certain media experimentations are far from identical to those initiated in the Brechtian laboratory. Brecht himself foresaw this when he commented: So is this new style of production the new style; is it a complete and comprehensible technique, the final result of every experiment? Answer: no. It is a way, the one we have followed. The effort must be continued. The problem holds for all art, and it is a vast one. The solution here aimed at is only one of the conceivable solutions to the problem [. .]. (135) Neither does a specific Brechtian political attitude survive the transliteration. All media types and media combinations must be evaluated separately and ideological tendencies situated into the appropriate historical and institutional context, for creative media employment and alliances often lead to unexpected results. In many ways the examples deviations with respect to Brechts theory and practice can also lead to important insights into the historical, social, and political specificity of art objects and their function in society. The lack of overt political messages in Run Lola Run, the dogmatic use of images as political message in Wim Wenders films, and the specific type of politics espoused in Exports CD-ROM are the most obvious example of this. Each of these texts speaks to a different audience and adopts a particular type of new technology, in accordance with the technologys suitability to accomplish specific tasks, to support its message. Wenders uses video in order to continue his directorial tradition of independent, high brow filmmaking. Tykwer chooses the videogame to open up filmic conventions, because his project is firmly grounded in popular culture and addresses a popular audience. Export opts for the CD-ROM, because this medium is most suited to

PAGE 64

55 her feminist, avant-garde affinity. As becomes apparent, in each of these cases, it is not only the medium that encompasses a specific historical continuity, but also the filmmaker and artist who carries on his or her own tradition. This somewhat counteracts the assumption that using new technological devices to affect old media has the ability to shake things up dramatically. Nonetheless, Tykwer, Wenders, and Export, among others embark on intriguing experimentations which can yield insights into structures, potential, interaction, and limitations of new media. These insights do not necessarily emerge from the filmmakers productive implementation of new media into their projects, but can result conversely from perceived shortcomings in the practical applications and/or theoretical underpinnings.

PAGE 65

CHAPTER 3 VIDEO AND FILM For the old forms of communication are not unaffected by the development of new ones, nor do they survive alongside of them. The filmgoer develops a different way of reading stories. But the man who writes the stories is a filmgoer too. Bertolt Brecht, Brecht on Theatre The Emergence and Development of Video as an Artistic Medium Video and Television Video, like other 20 th century imaging technologies, emerged as a war-related medium soon after 1945 and was used initially to radio-control planes and aircraft carriers (Virilio Interview 324). It entered mainstream culture via broadcast television in the fifties and sixties, and became a popular storage and recording device (to be played on a VCR) during the seventies and early eighties. From its inception, video offered an effective expressive tool to political activists, and it slowly infiltrated the art scene and museums in the form or as part of experimental, avant-garde, installation, and performance art. In the early eighties video technology single-handedly changed the entire pornography industry by making x-rated films accessiblein terms of both production and distributionto a much larger number of people than ever before; porn-films moved from seedy, relatively high-profile, and crime-infested inner city sites into the suburban living room. There are even some who argue that JVCs VHS video tapes eventually won the format war against Sonys Betamax because the latters tight 56

PAGE 66

57 licensing control shifted the pornography business to VHS-tapes (Kohn cited by Krochmal). 1 In the course of its multi-faceted history, video has been implemented as an artistic medium in the war against dominant cultural establishments (such as institutionalized art movements, museums, and sources of funding). It has served as a counter-broadcast-television medium on the one hand, and as a testing ground for (semiand non-) commercial television program content and direction on the other. Video has also supplied additional advertising venues for cultural products (e.g., as music videos, infomercials on tape, how-to product accompaniments, travel and tourism videos, etc.). Video technology has been implemented in the areas of law enforcement, private property protection and monitoring of persons, evolving, over time, into the quintessential surveillance apparatus. However, it is when employed as the raw materials for broadcast, cable and satellite television programming, that video demonstrates its full potential. Television, a mass medium and powerful cultural institution since the 1950s, exerts its influence on almost all areas of modern life, on art, entertainment, politics, education, information, fashion, economics, and culture in general. The impact of television programming on everyday lives cannot be underestimated. Indeed its preeminence is attested by the fact that most families and individuals in industrialized countries own and operate at least one (often more) television set in their homes (in fact, there are more TV-sets in operation then there are telephones [Peters 1]). In 1935, the first television service (utilizing 25 frames per second and 180-lines per frame resolution) was inaugurated by the city of Berlin. Images were produced on 1 For a more detailed account of the history of the videotape see Eugene Marlow and Eugene Secundas Shifting Time and Space: The Story of Videotape.

PAGE 67

58 film then scanned in using a rotary disk. Shortly thereafter a new electronic camera was developed, the iconoscope invented by Vladimir Zworykin and built by Telefunken, which was able to capture outdoor imagery (Peters 11). Hitlers resourceful, media-savvy propaganda machine put the new medium television to effective use for transmission of the 1936 Berlin Olympic Games. The city even built special viewing locales, called Fernsehstuben, to enable the public to take part in this event (13). 2 However, it was not until many years later that programs could be transmitted into the domestic sphere of the living room and received by a large number of viewers. Television began to incorporate video into its formal and institutional organization in the mid-1950s. Before video became a technological viability, film constituted the only medium with which television broadcasts could be recorded. Magnetic tape, already in use for sound, started to interest American television developers who were faced with a geographic dilemma since they were trying to broadcast live shows to an audience across a spectrum of several time zones. In 1956, Ampex developed the first black and white video recording system, soon to be followed by a color system made by RCA. These new systems quickly evolved to expand their function of delaying broadcasts to incorporate editing and other production purposes. The first all-electronic editing apparatus, introduced in the late 1960s, made physical splicing of tape obsolete. Helical-scan recorders (1959) enabled the use of slow motion and variable speed playback as well as other film-like editing techniques (26-27). 3 Video technology had a profound effect on 2 The verb fernsehen was first used by the German physicist Eduard Liesegang in 1890 (Peters 6). 3 Television special effects use electronic rather than chemical or optical techniques as is the case in film. A rapid electronic switch controlled by color variations (also called chroma-key technique) operates while two images are being scanned (Peters 27). The advent of digital television production has naturally changed the editing tools and techniques employed in television and transferred the process to the computer.

PAGE 68

59 almost every aspect of televisions output capabilities, acutely affecting program content and broadcasting times. Presumably, television could never have aspired to reach its by now axiomatic cultural significance without video recording technologies. Considering videos impressive vita, it is not surprising that it (especially in the form of television) has provided the focus of much critical discourse in the last fifty years. 4 It goes beyond the scope and purpose of this chapter to comprehensively trace and explain the different attitudes of critics toward this medium over the years or chronicle videos diverse production palette. Instead, I will limit myself to citing and relying on critical observations and examples of specific relevance to selective artistic roots of video leading to or hindering the complex relationship this medium maintains with its cousin film (to which it is related in terms of cultural significance but not necessarily through its technological make-up). 4 Most of the critical television discourse (in both senses of analytics and negativity) feeds on anxieties of potential political misrepresentation in programming and/or interference with and manipulation of cultural practices. Some of the most influential early critical voices concerning television practices, both positive and negative, have been McLuhan, Williams, Hall, Fiske, and Ellis. In 1964 Marshall McLuhan devotes a chapter in his Understanding Media to television calling it the timid giant. In his analysis he determines it to be a cool medium, meaning it favored viewer involvement and participation (unlike many later theories which tended to see it as a medium which causes viewer passivity). McLuhans theory was somewhat ahead of its time, because it focused on the medium itself, discrete from its content, but this also infused a certain amount of technological determinism into his ideas. Apart from McLuhan, television as a distinctive medium, did not begin to receive serious scholarly attention until the 1970s. Stuart Halls Encoding and Decoding (1973) and Raymond Williams Television: Technology and Cultural Form (1974) rank among the most influential early theories on the subject. Basing their positions on Marxist cultural theory, Williams and Hall are both concerned with televisions ideological message and role in mass society. Williams focuses on televisions public aspect as a key component of a potentially democratic medium of communication. He also develops the concept of flow (as opposed to cinemas sequence of discrete units) which figures prominently in several later television studies. Hall reflects on the audiences decoding of the television message which either coincides fully, partially, or not at all with the programs intended message, and viewers can therefore legitimize hegemony or potentially subvert it. In the 1980s, two important works theorizing television were John Fiskes Television Culture (1987) and John Elliss Broadcast TV Narration in Visible Fictions: Cinema, Television, Video (1982). The former highlights TVs semiotic system of meaning, its status within popular and mass culture, and its function as a commodity in capitalist society, whereas the latter focuses on televisions modes of narration which are primarily dependent on its particular institutional and material nature. For a systematic and general overview of the most important ideas in television studies see John Corners Critical Ideas in Television Studies (1999).

PAGE 69

60 Although video art (mostly disassociated from commercial venues) has existed for at least four decades since Nam June Paiks recording of the Popes visit in the US in 1963 (the mythical inauguration event), until recently, it has been perceived by many artists and art critics alike as located somewhere on the fringes of the art world and always in need of defining itself against and in spite of the overwhelming presence of television (Sturken 102). Art on video has been suffering since its inception from associations with commercial television. Kathy Rae Huffman points out that although there were several experiments attempting to adapt broadcast television as an artistic medium, its unsavory connection to mass entertainment and ties to commercial interests diminished its appeal to artists (81). 5 Nam June Paik, often credited for introducing video to the art scene, was an exception. He not only created some of the most acclaimed artistic videos but also used television images to enhance his performance pieces as one of the first and only artists to experiment with broadcast TV. 6 Rather than television failing as an aesthetic medium due to its technological abilities, it was mostly the lack of financial and institutional funding which inhibited fruitful combinations of video art and TV. In the early seventies, Paiks broadcast entitled Video CommuneThe Beatles from Beginning to End served as convincing evidence to document the aesthetic possibilities as well as freedom and openness to experimentation that television can support given generous funding (Huffman 84). This is not to say that Paik championed television in an 5 Some examples of experiments in the US were led by Bostons public television station WGBH and producer Fred Barzyk (The Medium is the Medium) as well as the San Franciscos KQED Center for Experiments in Television (in the mid-sixties), WNET in New York (in the early seventies), KTCA in Minneapolis (in the early eighties). In Germany, RTL, a commercial station provided a venue for video art on mainstream TV with the show Kunstkanal. However, the show did not run for long due to financial concerns. 6 Curiously, the first video art displayed at the Metropolitan Museum of Art in New York, however, was not by Nam June Paik, but Projects: Bill Viola by Bill Viola in 1979.

PAGE 70

61 exclusively positive light. In the 1960s and 70s he produced several pieces which directly (even physically) assaulted television as an apparatus. Paik altered the circuitry of a TV-set to display a single horizontal line, warped TV images by placing a magnet on the set, and gutted a TV casing, replacing the picture tube with a candle. 7 Yet, it was not only video art that engaged in a struggle against the hegemonic qualities of commercial television. Videos employed in the service of political activism also benefited from and achieved some of their critical momentum from a similar strife. 8 Because video technology was relatively affordable, easy to operate, and portable enough to move around comfortably, it inspired the undertaking of many independent projects. Marita Sturken observes that videos early years are often remembered as a time when freedom of the spirit abounded, when artists and activists discovered a new medium and took to the streets with it, assured that their guerilla tactics would ultimately change television (106). But activist video recordings could reach a much greater audience when employing television as a delivery apparatus and thus guerilla television was born. 9 Video art and activism collaborated with and critically confronted televisionthe television/video relationship was both too close for comfort and concurrently a creative well for artists and activists. 7 Paiks first solo exhibition in 1963, Exposition of MusicElectronic Television, at the Galerie Parnass in Wuppertal, Germany featured his early experimentation with television. 8 This is not to say that this trend is obsolete today. Paper Tiger Television, for example, although not strictly conceptualized as a medium for political activism, but certainly containing political content, uses a highly self-reflexive style in its own struggle to offer an alternative to mainstream TV. Broadcasting television shows since the early eighties, it defines itself as a public access TV show which looks at the communications industry via the media in all of their forms and leads an investigation into the corporate structures of the media and critical analysis of their content [as] one way to demystify the information industry (About Paper Tiger). Paper Tiger Television appears weekly on a Manhattan public access channel and covers a wide variety of topics. 9 Sturken defines guerilla television as a political protest medium, an instrument which allows activists to point out the foolishness of society and/or a tool to establish an alternative in form and content to commercial television (107-8).

PAGE 71

62 Gregory Ulmer correctly notes in Teletheory that television and video are intimately coupled because the former can be thought of as the name for the institution that has arisen to manage and distribute the medium of video (x). However, video art in particular has come to be institutionalized by museums. According to art historian Martha Rosler, the museumization of video art has over time successfully split the medium from any association with broadcast television (33). 10 Again, video art is not somehow inherently adversarial to television technology, rather concerns related to artistic autonomy encouraged the split. Deregulation and privatization in the US but also in many European countries, beginning in the 1980s and culminating in the 1990s, transformed television into a commercial venue of unequaled proportion. This development has further entrenched attitudes that view television as guilty by association and always suspect whenever program content is in question. 11 Furthermore, as Huffman explains, the shift from early experimentation on public TV stations to the museumization of video occurred in the 1980s when media art centers, supported by outside funding, became a more attractive workplace to video artists because of high-tech equipment availability and the lack of commercial pressures (88). The videotapes produced in such centers eventually ended up in museums and artist-created exhibition spaces rather than on the 10 In spite of this museumization process, video was originally conceived by many artists as an appropriate artistic medium to be used to attack established institutions such as museums and galleries, because, as Frank Gillette has noted: Video was the solution because it had no tradition. It was the precise opposite of painting (quoted in Sturken 107). 11 This critique is not without its merits. A TV-commercial certainly contains and cultivates a specific type of relationship with the program it is interrupting, as do station trailers and other intersegments. Television program content organizes itself around the interruptions, incorporating them into narrative structure, plot, even setting, and flow. Conversely, advertisements are designed to appeal to the target audience of the program into which they are spliced. Often, commercials utilize similar content, rhythm, style, and actors as the main show.

PAGE 72

63 air where artists had to contend with greater restrictions on form and content of their material. 12 While reluctantly infiltrating mainstream high-brow art, video concurrently turned to film for inspiration. 13 Most obvious was the application of film experience, technique and genres to this new medium. 14 In Europe, Jean-Luc Godard was one of the first filmmakers to adopt video as an artistic medium. According to Thomas Elsaesser, it was mainly videos economical and compact recording technology that led Godard to regard it as a proper medium for avant-garde and independent productions (Cinema Futures 10). Godards acceptance of this emerging medium as an image-making technology allowed him to subvert the image-producing dominance of mainstream cinema, avoid commercialized avenues of filmmaking and consequently remain an autonomous and experimental director. Other European artists soon followed Godards example and video slowly penetrated domains in which cinema once ruled supremely: the production of fictional entertainment. 15 In Germany, several artists created the first fiction videofilms in the early eighties, such as Neonschatten (1980) by Marco Serafini, Zeichen und Wunder (1981) by Niklaus Schilling and Der tiefe Spiegel (1982) by Michael Feick (1982). In 1983, Bundschuh and Bauer shot Dj vu oder die gebndigte Geliebte entirely on video. Apart from using this new material to keep the costs at a 12 In Germany, two of the most successful workshops were Die Medienoperative Berlin (mob) (founded in 1977) and Medienwerkstatt Freiburg (founded in 1978). Both produced political activist videos (Roth 213). 13 The reverse is also true. Timothy Corrigan has pointed out, for example, that certain cinematic developments, such as the promotion of blockbuster films, had an instrumental influence upon VCRs as well as satellite and cable television (26). 14 Video as a medium also served as the main theme for several high-budget and independently produced Hollywood films, e.g., Videodrome (1983), Tapeheads (1988) Sex, Lies and Videotape (1989), The Blair Witch Project (1999), Camera (2000), 15 Minutes (2001), The Ring (2002), etc. 15 Non-fiction videos by filmmakers such as Harun Farocki emerged in the early 1970s.

PAGE 73

64 minimum, these two artists also employed video on the level of plot (the videofilm tells the story of a man who constructs himself a new reality with the help of his home video system) and integrated its technology into their aesthetical approach. In Germany, a particularly productive relationship developed between state-subsidized television (ffentlich-rechtliche Anstalten) and the emerging creative explosion of the New German Cinema movement; this association had significant influence on the latters success. Virtually all films produced by New German Cinema directors in the seventies and eighties were at least in part financed by television stations such as the WDR (Westdeutscher Rundfunk), the ZDF (Zweites Deutsches Fernsehen), ARD (Allgemeiner Rundfunk Deutschlands), NDR (Norddeutscher Rundfunk), SWF (Sdwestfunk), etc. These films were seen by more people on television (either via broadcast, cable, satellite or on videotapes) than on theater screens. Wim Wenders is an excellent case in point because not only were all of his films financially supported by TV stations, he was also one of the first New German Cinema directors to take advantage of videotapes as a commercial distribution apparatus for his films (Alter 125). Wenders also continued his highly prolific relationship with television after the dissipation of New German Cinema as a distinct artistic movement; he accepted television funding and experimented in his films with traditional and digital video technologies such as HDTV, which were, as the name implies, originally conceptualized to serve television, not the film industry. In what follows, I explore how Wenderss relationship with technological innovations have influenced his filmmaking practices in general and films in specific. Although there have been other critical studies of Wenderss aesthetic treatment of and

PAGE 74

65 artistic relationship with video, most notably Martin Baiers Film, Video und HDTV (1996) and Global Politics, Cinematographic Space: Wenderss Tokyo-Ga and Notebooks on Cities and Clothes, in Nora Alters Projecting History (2002), my account departs from or augments them in several ways. Baier examines Wenders experimentation with new recording techniques in Nicks Film, Notebooks of Cities and Clothes, and Until the End of the World within the context of his entire filmic output of the last three decades in order to show that these films fit into the filmmakers uvre overall. This chapter, in contrast, has no such ambitions. On the contrary, I argue that Wenders allows his preoccupation with remaining at the forefront of what is technologically possible in filmmaking to impede upon the quality of work which he is otherwise capable of producing. Also, Baier does not pay attention to the formal specifications of the media which Wenders employs, but concentrates on the overall aesthetic product instead. Indeed, he conflates analog video with digital video technology in his investigation, stating that the latter is merely an improvement upon the former technology, whereas my study makes a clear distinction between the two and treats them as separate technologies altogether. Finally, I also add a treatment of The End of Violence (1997) and mention several other films and practices that are dated after the publication date of Baiers Film, Video, and HDTV, for Wenders an important period of time, because it launches him into a completely new relationship with video technology. My approach to Wenderss experimentations with recording technologies departs from Alters Projecting History in that I concentrate predominantly on Wenderss feature films and his use of HDTV, whereas Alter focuses on Wenderss non-fiction productions and

PAGE 75

66 situates the technology (principally analog) into the specific context of the essay film and German history. HDTV In 1990 Wenders began to experiment with a new recording technology that was originally developed in Japan. NHK, the Japanese public broadcast television station, started to pursue research on HDTV in 1964 and active development of the technology began in the mid-seventies. But only recently has it advanced as a technology that may soon make most consumer TVs, VCRs, and non-digital professional video equipment obsolete. What sets HDTV and high-definition video apart from their conventional standard definition counterparts is not only restricted to resolution as implied by the name. In addition to HDTVs increased number of luminance picture elements, about 2 Million pixels per frame in 1125 scanning lines, roughly 6 times the resolution of NTSC (the standard video format for the US) and four times the sharpness of PAL (the European standard), it also features a wide-screen aspect ratio of approximately 16:9 (compared to 4:3 for NTSC and PAL), a picture that is almost free of distortion and interference (common problems with analog technologies), and makes interactive programs possible. Additionally, HDTV lowers production, post-production, distribution, and storage costs. Although high definition video is closely aligned with film stock regarding image quality and aspect ratio, it is a much cheaper production and post-production material in comparison. There are no costs for film prints (ca. $2000 per print) if projection is done digitally, because there exists no negative. Also, HD tape is much cheaper to use than traditional film stock. A fifty-minute tape for the Sony HDW-F900 camera only costs about $65 versus thousands of dollars for film stock of the same capacity (including processing). Moreover, editing and special effects become more cost

PAGE 76

67 effective due to the efficient manipulation of binary code on the computer. There are also cost-cutting features associated with the prolonged shelf life of the digital format in archives. Although high-definition technology has only in the nineties become a widely known technology, its was unveiled by Japanese electronics companies to industries outside of the country in the early 1980s. In the mid-1980s a considerate effort was launched to develop international television standards mainly concerned with the rate of scanning lines. However, North American, Japanese, and European governments could not agree on a universal standard. Joseph Flaherty explains that the Europeans, for one, worried that Japanese products would flood the market and ruin the domestic industry if they agreed upon a world-wide standard. They even went so far as to launch and fund research on a strictly European standard, the Eureka project, which would enable the European electronics industry to catch up and eventually monopolize the internal market. European efforts to design their own technical conventions reached a climactic level in 1986 at the ITU (International Telecommunication Union) Plenary in Dubrovnik when standards proposed by American and Japanese developers were rejected. Eventually, however, the European industry abandoned the Eureka project and renewed efforts to devise an international common image format began to take shape. Finally, between 1999 and 2000, Study Group II of the ITU composed and adopted Recommendation ITU-R BT. 709-3, entitled "Parameter Values for the HDTV Standards for Production and Program Exchange." This treatise defines common parameter values for the HDTV image with a fluctuating picture rate that adjusts in order to accommodate different applications (Flaherty). Almost three decades after designs for high-definition television

PAGE 77

68 first circulated in Japan, a common standard, based on NHK technology, has finally made it possible to produce affordable equipment which can record, manipulate and distribute HDTV recordings on a worldwide scale. 16 Recently, high-definition equipment such as the Sony HDW-F900 (with Panasonic lenses) received international exposure and attention, because it was used as the main camera to record the blockbuster Star Wars Episode 2: Attack of the Clones (2002). The process of producing films for cinema projection with digital video such as HDTV is at first glance not as complicated and different from conventional film production as one may expect. Camera operators still record images in a fashion similar to conventional techniques, albeit with different equipment. While the new technology does not require much in the way of innovation in mise-en-scene composition, certain digital video peculiarities such as lighting and color schemes have to be taken into consideration. Important differences come into play while and after the recording process. Digital equipment is often relatively compact and easy to handle enabling the film crew to produce a series of images through more natural movements. As is the case with conventional video, directors can view the recorded action in real-time or immediately after taping and decide on the spot whether re-takes and corrections are needed. Film stock, in contrast, has to be processed overnight before it can be reviewed. The digitally-taped segments are transferred directly from tape to the computer hard drive and can be manipulated in various ways through editing and digital special effects. Digital recordings are deliverable instantaneously, via high-speed data lines, to post16 High definition television received a high-profile, global platform at the United Nations Millennium Summit in 2000 where speeches by world leaders were broadcast in high definition and projected onto 300-inch screens in the General Assembly Hall of the United Nations. Another highly visible employment of HDTV has been in the space program. The shuttle has broadcast space images in high definition on several occasions thus far.

PAGE 78

69 production facilities where work can commence without any delay. (With conventional film stock, images must first be scanned in and converted to digital code before computers can add effects to the filmed scenes.) Color corrections are possible in the smallest detail, pixel by pixel. If the finished product is destined to be shown on conventional analog projectors, a negative print has to be created using lasers and a special film printer. From this negative, positive prints can be produced in the traditional manner and sent to theaters. In contrast, theaters that are able to project images digitally can receive the finished digital film with no added steps or costly intermittent chemical processes. The digital print is delivered on a portable storage medium such as a DVD-ROM or a digital tape, or, even more efficiently, sent via satellite data stream. Every copy looks exactly the same; loss in quality due to duplication never occurs with digital code (unless the code is compromised). Although digital film production is merely in its infancy, it obviously operates more efficiently and effectively than the traditional production system. The Sony HDW-F900 represents merely the beginning in what promises to be a productive future for digital video equipment used in film production. Wim Wenders: Rebel without a Clear Cause? [Video] represents a kind of democratic dilettantism: anyone can do it, anyone may do it, who gives a shit. Wim Wenders, On Film (1990) Id like to pass on a word of advice: image-makers and producers working in High Definition should try to learn from a better source and a better tradition than television. They should try to learn from the far more expressive and civilized language of the cinema. Wim Wenders, On Film (1990) My own view of the future of cinema is less bleak than it was in 1981, when I made The State of Things. New perspectives have opened up that were less evident then, or perhaps some of my old bogeymen have disappeared. There is no longer the

PAGE 79

70 arch-enemy television and the devil video, because behind and beyond them there is a possible new ally and a new cinematic language in the form of the high resolution digitally sorted image which is currently being developed. Wim Wenders, On Film (1991) Before Star Wars propelled the Sony camera to international stardom, Wim Wenders had already experimented with it in his recording of the U2 music video to accompany the song The Ground beneath Her Feet (part of the soundtrack for his film Million Dollar Hotel [2000]). But these images were not Wenderss first to be recorded on digital or high-definition equipment. 17 He also shot the low-budget (but relatively successful) documentary Buena Vista Social Club (1999) entirely on Digital Betacam. And almost a decade prior to Buena Vista Social Club, in 1990, he spend several weeks in Tokyo as one of the first Europeans (along with Peter Greenaway) who were allowed to work with HDTV at NHK and Sony. Wenders used some of the images from the Japanese HDTV-lab in his 1991 feature film Until the End of the World. Although throughout Wenderss more than 30 years of filmmaking, his uvre creates the impression of being exceedingly receptive toward new media, his experiments also exhibit a certain ambivalence, a concomitant distrust and enthusiasm, concerning emerging visual technologies. From his earliest attempts to use a video camera in Nicks Film: Lightning over Water (1980) to further examinations of this technology in the essay film Notebook on Cities and Clothes (1989), to high definition experiments in Until the End of the World and digital video use in Buena Vista Social Club, his artistic use of new imaging technology often exhibits a cryptic constitution. Besides using video to record 17 The terms digital and high-definition are not synonymous. Digital video has lower resolution capability, uses different camera equipment and storage devices than HDTV. It is however possible, to convert digital to high-definition video, but the end result will not exactly match the quality of recordings filmed originally with high definition video.

PAGE 80

71 images, Wenders also incorporates this technology into his films as themes and topics. The End of Violence (1997), for example, features a video surveillance system and the presence of television in one form or another is an ubiquitous element found throughout Wenderss films, from Kings of the Road (1976) to Million Dollar Hotel (2000). 18 Wenders has been involved in a love/hate relationship with the medium video, using it whenever possible and concurrently expressing disdain and enthusiasm for it (especially television) in interviews, films and his critical writings. In the 1980 film Nicks Film: Lightening over Water, Wenders records the last days of the dying American director (and Wenders idol) Nicholas Ray, who has directed such Hollywood classics as In a Lonely Place (1950) and Rebel without a Cause (1955). Wenders and Tom Farrell, a student of Rays, film the sick man who is suffering from cancer not only with conventional equipment but also on video, the former intending to draw an analogy from the video technology to the invasive cancer within the latters body. This analogy represents an extremely venomous attack when applied generally to video as an artistic medium. Even the most rudimentary knowledge of biology confirms that cancer cannot spread without using healthy cells as hosts, which is to say that video must destroy film (the healthy" medium in Wenderss analogy) if it is to creatively grow. Whether Wenders intended to extend his analogys meaning from his specific use in Lightening to a general application and consequently arrive at such an unrelenting statement is not entirely clear. In 1980 he nevertheless exhibits none of the enthusiasm that many of his contemporaries, filmmakers and artists, displayed for this new medium. 18 Alter points out in Projecting History that, TV has forcefully intruded into Wenderss films, insinuating its supposedly malevolent, totalitarian, fascist presence into every nook and cranny of filmed everyday life (125).

PAGE 81

72 The Superiority of the Filmic Image over Other Recordings But what exactly defines Wenderss attitude toward emerging technologies which threaten to remediate film and the cinema? Before this question can be answered, and if at all, a short summary of Wenderss development as a film practitioner and theorist spanning the years between Lightening over Water to some of his recent films can provide a preliminary insight into the directors possible motivations and beliefs. Soon after Wenderss film about Nicholas Ray debuted, the films Reverse Angle, Hammett, and The State of Things followed in 1982. While none of these films utilize video as a recording device, Reverse Angle and The State of Things both thematized image-making technologies and institutions. In the same year Wenders also recorded a short documentary film at the Cannes film festival entitled Chambre 666 which more overtly revisits his concerns of 1980. For this film, Wenders set up a camera and filmed the reaction of several directors (Spielberg, Antonioni, Herzog, Fassbinder, Godard, etc.) to the following question: Increasingly, films are looking as though they had been made for television, as regards their lighting, framing and rhythm. It looks as though a television aesthetic has supplanted film aesthetic. Many new films no longer refer to any reality outside the cinemaonly to experiences contained in other filmsas though life itself no longer furnished material for stories. Fewer films get made. The trend is towards increasingly expensive super-productions at the expense of the little film. And a lot of films are immediately available on video cassettes. That market is expanding rapidly. Many people prefer to watch films at home. So my question is: Is cinema becoming a dead language, an art which is already in the process of decline? 19 (Wenders On Film 182-83) 19 The statement that films use too many points of self-reference is an odd comment, especially coming from Wenders. Wenders has always been an avid practitioner of recycling inter-filmic realities himself. Throughout his career, he has reused characters (e.g., the detective Winter, his angels from Wings of Desire [in his 1995 Lumire & Company segment]), copied shots from other directors (e.g., Ozus Tokyo street shot), employed directors that have had influence on his own career as actors (e.g., Sam Fuller and Nicholas Ray), used fashion creations from documentary subjects in his fiction films (Yamamoto), made videos & films of artists that appear on the soundtracks of other films (U2 and BAP), and recycled locations from his films (e.g., the Tokyo Pachinko parlors).

PAGE 82

73 The formulation of the question makes abundantly clear that Wenderss apprehensive stance toward video is chiefly based on his fears that it will replace (not only corrupt as he claims in Lightening over Water) his artistic medium, namely films made for cinema and that his anxiety is chiefly directed at video as television, in other words at the institution not the medium itself. He expresses his concerns more explicitly in an interview in 1990 when he notes: Now if you accept for all our attachment to the cinema that infinitely more people watch videos these days than go out and see films, if you take that as a given, and if you accept the projection of how things will be in ten years time, say, then it seems to me youve got to put an end to the deadly enmity between the two, and accept video as a language. (On Film 72) Videos prominent place in years to come evidently provides a more convincing impetus to adopt it as an artistic tool than its medium-specific qualities; Wenderss motivations appear less driven by artistic concerns than by his fears that he may be left behind by technology. In Chambre 666 the filmmakers reaction to Wenderss question varied, from Fassbinders self-assured argument that films deliver what filmmakers infuse into them, while televisions money can help realize the filmmakers individual vision, to Spielbergs criticism of economic pressures produced by Hollywoods insistence on propagating blockbusters (in retrospect a rather ironic reaction from a director who has arguably supplied the blockbuster phenomenon with more steam than any other). Of the responses, one stands out in particular. Michelangelo Antonioni, in his reply, declares that what we should really do is adapt ourselves to the future world and its modes of representation. [. .] We must turn our minds not to the immediate but to the distant future and somewhat prophetically predicts that high-quality video cassettes will soon bring films into peoples homes (quoted in Wenders On Film 189-90). He defends video

PAGE 83

74 as a medium worthy of experimentation, especially if it harbors the ability to conquer film, as Wenders predicts in the original question. As Baier rightly points out in Film, Video und HDTV: Die Audiovisionen des Wim Wenders, Wenderss turning point for his negative attitude toward video (at least in his comments) ostensibly comes after Chambre 666, when he adopts Antonionis more positive outlook and willingness to experiment with video. 20 Wenderss theories in the early 1980s concerning the adverse influence of video on films and the cinema as an institution were, by no means, an isolated critique. Other New German Cinema directors as well as theater owners agreed with Wenders and appended his aesthetic apprehensions with the view that TV would develop into cinemas most precarious competitor for audiences. In general, Hollywood and national film industries outside of the US, including Germanys, viewed television, when it first emerged as a mass medium, as the likely hangman of the cinema. Obviously, in retrospect, this anxiety has proven to be unfounded. However, in the early eighties, with the advent of cable and pay TV, critics, especially in Germany, still (or again) felt uneasy about how this new medium would affect domestic motion pictures. As previously mentioned, this apprehension, in contrast to Wenderss concerns of aesthetic confluence, predominantly focused on TV as diverting cinema audiences. The Arbeitsgemeinschaft Kino e.V., a group of small movie theater owners who provided a venue for films by New German Cinema directors, declared the following in the early eighties: Cable televisions establishment, the emergence of private television organizations and ever-increasing 20 Baier adds that after and during the filming of Notebooks Wenders acts as if his insights into video are his own rather than a modification of Antonionis response in Chambre 666. This is not an entirely accurate assessment. In a conversation with Wolfram Schtte in 1982, Wenders clearly acknowledged his high regard for Antonionis response and singled it out as an attitude which made a considerable impression on him (On Film 206).

PAGE 84

75 broadcasting of fiction films in state and publicly controlled stations are causing conditions under which the majority of German cinemas will eventually cease to be able to exist(55) (a theme which Wenders treats in his Kings of the Road). 21 This bleak conclusion also did not prove to be an accurate prediction. As Hall points out, it was not German cinemas, where most owners main concerns coincide with high profits from admission prices (which can be achieved more securely with Hollywood blockbusters), that kept New German Cinema alive. Rather it was German television stations, through financial backing and acting as an exhibition venue, that had the greatest effect and a high stake in preserving an alternative national cinema (172). As noted before, after Lightening and Chambre 666, Wenders not only discarded his former hostility toward video, showcased as a cancer in the former and defacer of film in the latter, but, practically speaking, wholeheartedly embraced this medium. In a recent real-time chat on the Internet he even went so far as to claim that his animosity toward video dates back to the seventies (although Lightening over Water was completed in 1980) and that a medium that he had once seen as a devil and enemy now had turned into a welcomed ally. However, it was not until Notebooks of Cities and Clothes, that, almost ten years later and to his own surprise (at least according to the voiceover in the film), Wenders admits to accepting that the specifics of video technology can yield artistic merit. He comments: I made myself take [video] seriously, and, to my astonishment, found myself enjoying it. And thats why I now believe you can use it in a serious wayin spite of the way Ive inveighed against it in the past (On Film 351). 21 In the original: Die Etablierung des Kabelfernsehens, die Zulassung privater Fernsehgesellschaften und die inflationre Ausstrahlung von Spielfilmen durch die ffentlich-rechtlichen Fernsehanstalten fhren zu Bedingungen, unter denen die Mehrzahl der deutschen Filmtheater nicht mehr weiter bestehen knnen.

PAGE 85

76 Indeed, in Notebooks Wenders showcases some of videos advantages over film. For example, when he displays video clips of the fashion show simultaneously with the filmed/live show, he alludes to videos instant replay and real-time properties. In another segment his voice-over comments on the unobtrusiveness of the video equipment on the action in a scene as compared to bulky film cameras. His subjects, Yamamoto and his crew, are more inclined to act natural in front of a video camera with a single recording agent than when faced with a film crew and much larger and conspicuous equipment. Wenders often films the video camera itself, so obviously compact and easy to handle, and emphasizes its view-screen, the replay mechanism, in his recordings. Apart from these comments and implementations, however, Wenders cannot completely hide that he still strives with his ambiguous feelings toward video. The voice-over (Wenders) comments on the recordings made of Tokyo: In its own language, the video camera was capturing this city in an appropriate way. I was shocked: a language of images was not the privilege of cinema. But, in an interview discussing the film, he adds that his use of video is rescued when he transfers it ultimately to film because he would never ever use video that had to remain video (On Film 353, my emphasis). This, of course, does not in any way echo Wenderss comment that after the seventies he had accepted video as an ally. It makes clear, that even in 1989 he was still struggling with any such concessions. One aspect that can set traditional video images apart from film is the tendency to favor medium close-up shots over distance and panorama shots mainly due to videos reduced image resolution and the size of the television set as the display medium. In Wenderss films, however, exists an abundance of long shots, a pre-occupation with

PAGE 86

77 scenery (especially in his road movies) and frequent usage of film formats that exceed the size of traditional 35mm film stock. Even at the early stages of his career (especially internationally) the popular press identifies Wenders with a style affected by wide, panoramic images. In a Time International spread in 1979, under the title The Visions of Wenders, Time depicts the German director with his (now ex-) wife as a bride against the widescreen panorama backdrop of an Idaho landscape (The Visions). In the last few years, in order to increase the dramatic effect of his widescreen images, Wenders has employed Cinemascope format in several of his films, such as End of Violence and The Million Dollar Hotel, and 70mm in Until the End of the World, a format which he claims has not been used for any other European film in twenty years (On Film 286) and which many cinemas are not equipped to project anymore (for distribution purposes the film was released on 35mm). 22 In the chat forum for Wenderss website ( www.wim-wenders.com ) rumors circulate that the filmmaker is planning on making yet another movie about Berlin, but this time filmed in IMAX, the largest image format in existence today. Most American films, shot after 1955, use a standard widescreen format with an aspect ratio of 1.85:1 and European films usually employ an aspect ratio of 1.66:1. Cinemascope is much wider than these standard formats with an aspect ratio of 2.35:1 and movies recorded in this format do so with the help of an anamorphic lens. IMAX, as the most extreme of all formats, must be projected in a special facility, because it features an image size ten times that of the standard widescreen format. In comparison, a typical 22 Interestingly, according to John Belton, digital technology has had a particularly damaging effect on the 70mm exhibition format. He contends that six-track digital sound combined with 35mm is more attractive to studios, because it is cheaper to produce than six-track stereo magnetic sound used for 70mm prints (103).

PAGE 87

78 television set has an aspect ratio of 1.33:1, which means that films that use an especially wide format have a more difficult time being shown on television or VHS-format video, because so much of the filmed material has to be omitted (or is shrunk to a narrow band). To lesson the impact of this image reduction somewhat, the industry has developed a technique called pan and scan where the image is first shown in its entirety in a pan and then remains fixed on one, presumably visually important, section. Of course, this procedure manipulates the filmmakers original version of the film to some degree, and many cineastes prefer to watch the film in its original size on their television, in widescreen, although this reduces the image size overall and adds black bars of variable heights (depending on the original format of the film) to the top and bottom of the picture. By using formats such as Cinemascope and 70mm, it seems that Wim Wenders consistently strives to offer, within his films, images that are, at least to some degree, hostile to television technology. 23 Cinemascope, in particular, was invented in the early fifties (and first featured in The Robe [1953]), specifically to lure audiences away from television. 24 Wenders evidently uses the format with similar intentions more than forty years later. 25 23 Wenderss disdain for projecting his extra-wide formats on a limited display screen is obvious, as attested by his inclusion of a film still from The End of Violence with the films DVD packaging. This still has inscribed, superimposed over the image of the female lead, the areas of the film still that would not be visible to viewers on a limited size screen. 24 TVs technological development, however, has always trailed that of film, for example, concerning resolution (only in the nineties can it approach 35mm with HDTV), size (will always be limited because of domestic setting), color (decades after film), audio quality (surround sound technology can only attempt to imitate stereo system in theaters). TV should have felt anxiety about cinema, not the other way around. 25 In theory, both Imax and 70mm yield more visual information and finer image detail than the 35mm format due to the wider gauge of the film stock.

PAGE 88

79 Wenders as Digital Guru In recent years, Wenders has received much positive critical attention internationally and in Germany with his experiments in digital filmmaking. 26 He acknowledged the significance of an impending digital revolution on cinematic ground as early as 1990 when he states: The leap from photographic image to digital information really is a revolution: the risk is that film just stands there gawping [sic] with its mouth open, and misses the connection. (On Film 352) It has become apparent that Wenders will not be among those left behind paralyzed in wonder, but will be actively engaged in shaping the future. 27 In 1999 Wenders received the Production Solution Award at the International Broadcasting Convention "Le Nombre d'Or" for his use of digital video as an alternative to 16mm film (a format frequently used for documentaries). At the 2000 Berlinale the all-digital version of Wim Wenderss The Million Dollar Hotel was projected at the official screening (although the film was shot on conventional stock and later transferred). Wenders also conducted a digital workshop with Das Werk, Sony, and Panavision representatives at the 2000 Berlinale. Moreover, Wenders interest and history in experimentation with image technologies surely contributed to Sarah Moons decision to include him as one of the forty directors to retro-film a fifty-two-second segment with a vintage Lumire camera in Lumire & Company (1995). In 2000, Wenders proved his au courant technical standing when he and his production company RMF (in cooperation with the WDR and the Filmstiftung Nordrhein-Westfalen) publicized their plans to 26 On the other hand, Wenders new-found enthusiasm for the latest innovations in video has also drawn some criticism. Norbert Grob, for example, argues that, it seems that because of his involvement in these technical aspects Wenders has lost touch with his own cinematic precepts (203). 27 Although Wenders is mentioned frequently in the popular and critical press as one of the visionaries who have allowed digital images to enter mainstream filmmaking, it was actually Francis Ford Coppola and George Lucas, two Hollywood directors, who initially heralded all-digital film productions. Wenders first experiments in the early nineties came much later.

PAGE 89

80 produce Radikal Digital, a forum for European newcomer filmmakers, which will include six films recorded digitally and inspired by the Dogma-style of filmmaking. Shortly after Radikal Digital, Wenders announced on his webpage a competition entitled E-Motion Bytes geared toward aspiring filmmakers in Europe. The website declared that the award aims to celebrate the latest developments in young digital filmmaking, to support new talents and to demonstrate the usage of digital media technology in the realization of images and stories. Wenders also added the somewhat arrogant statement the E-MOTION BYTES, Road Movies Digital Shorts Award, stands for Road Movies and Das Werks commitment in new and aspiring filmmaking, confirming their position as world pioneers (Forum, my emphasis). The E-Motion Bytes Road Movies Digital Shorts Awards were scheduled to take place at the 2001 Hof International Filmdays in Bavaria. Wenders, in collaboration with RMF partner Ulrich Felsberg, was planning to award the prizes (including a DM 10,000 prize), but it was decided to move the ceremony to the following year because they determined that only a limited number of the submitted entries shed light on the current state of digital filmmaking, i.e., demonstrated the various possibilities in digital filmmaking (E-Motion Bytes). 28 Apparently too many young, aspiring filmmakers were treating this new medium little different than conventional film technologies (a charge which I will extend to Wenders himself, a little later). Although certain aspects of video, especially its association with television, estranged Wenders from this medium through the 1980s, the subsequent decade brought about a complete reversal in Wenderss attitudenot toward conventional video 28 In the original, Wir mussten feststellen, dass nur eine unzureichende Anzahl der eingereichten Beitrge die derzeitige Lage des digitalen Filmschaffens beleuchtet, bzw. die verschiedensten Mglichkeiten des digitalen Films demonstriert (E-Motion Bytes).

PAGE 90

81 technology, but to emerging digital video technology. As already mentioned, after his experimentation with early HDTV in Until the End of the World, Wenders recorded his music-documentary Buena Vista Social Club entirely on digital tape with the Sony Digi-Beta camera. Since then, he has become an avid user of digital video equipment, especially for his non-fiction work and his music videos. For U2s The Ground beneath Her Feet he opted for high-definition again and used Sonys HDW-F900 camcorder which is able to shoot in 24fps (like a film camera) progressive high definition. His move to digital technology was aided by the 1999 RMF (Road Movies Filmproduktion, Wenderss production company) merger with Das Werk, a digital post-production company. This alliance ensured Wenders ready access to digital production and post-production facilities and equipment. Until the End of the World or How to Split HD from TV Wenderss use and self-professed, albeit reserved, admiration for video in the film Notebooks of Cities and Clothes, the 1989 essay film about Tokyo fashion designer Yohji Yamamoto, was to be his final experimentation with conventional video technology. However, it was not the last time he directed a film which thematizes emerging visual technologies and their relation to the established medium of film. In Until the End of the World he revisits his interest and preoccupation for any technology which has the potential to displace or negatively affect the cinematic image. 29 However, in Until the End of the World, in contrast to Lightening over Water, Wenders does not simply depict video as a technology pitted against film. 30 Instead, the film uses a digital video 29 Since the extended UtEotW version is not commercially available (yet), I will confine my comments and interpretations to the shorter, official and autonomous version of the film. 30 I will henceforth use the acronym UtEotW to refer to Until the End of the World.

PAGE 91

82 technology, namely HDTV, which is much different from the standard video Wenders used in the past, and he integrates it in a much more problematic and, at the same time, interesting manner into the films fiction and form. The staging of technology in general in UtEotW, presented in the form of gadgets such as video phones, auditory and tracking surveillance equipment, on-board computers, video faxes, etc., serves an important self-referential function, in that it reminds the viewer that Wenders has already made the first step into a prospective techno-laden future by using a new technology in the film himself. 31 In UtEotW, Wenders explores videos future place in a society (represented in the film by HDTV) that appears saturated with an overload of images. In the fictional adaptation and in the technical realization, videos prospective status as a cultural determinant is dramatized in anything but a positive way. In the film, the main characters experience mental breakdown and one character even dies after having viewed the recorded high definition images. In 1990, after Wim Wenders spend several weeks in Tokyo experimenting with HDTV, he appears highly enthusiastic about high definition videos possibilities (in public talks on the subject), especially when applied to the realm of filmmaking. At he same time, however, he reveals an ambivalence about HDTVs intimacy with broadcast television. In fact, in his speeches, interviews, and theoretical writings, he prefers to use the Japanese title for HDTV which is High Vision with the designation television conspicuously absent. At best, Wenders, a staunch critic of televisions influence on film practices and viewer expectations, sees HDTV as a medium which can aid in distancing viewers from this perceived negative influence. In his opinion, high definition technology 31 Ironically, the end of the world is represented by a catastrophe that only targets technology and does not destroy life. All electro-magnetic circuits get wiped from the nuclear blast but people are unaffected otherwise.

PAGE 92

83 is aligned closer with film than with traditional television and therefore able to project more truth (a fantastic claim). Wenders is not alone in asserting HDTVs positive influence on television as a medium. There are several other critics and practitioners who agree with the basic premise of his analogy. 32 Siegfried Zielinski, for example, makes similar claims in his essay Fin de Sicle of Television as even the title implies. He also prefers the term Hi-Vision (specifically to disassociate it from TV) and defines HDTV as a hybrid medium capable of delivering a more natural aspect ratio (which we know from the cinema), larger image projection (closer to cinema screen size), better image quality (approaching 35mm film), film-like need for quality set design and compositions, and adapting many film aesthetics (e.g., the individual shot may become calmer and steadier [as in classic cinema]). Overall, Zielinskis (as well as Wenderss) projected improvements inherent in HDTV over traditional technology all remain concerned with achieving a more film-like experience, notwithstanding a smaller screen in a domestic setting. 33 However, Zielinski is right to point out that the heightening of realism revealed in a high-def program in reality translates into heightened illusionism (79-80), whereas Wenders puts forth the rather nave view that more true images will emerge. 34 During a 32 Critics like Baier assert that HDTV is not a new technology but rather a technological improvement of conventional video (72). I would disagree with this assessment and posit the claim that HDTV is to video what the typewriter is to the computer word processor. Baier underestimates HDTVs otherness. 33 Zielinski also includes a brief summary of Alexander Kluges ventures with commercial TV and concludes that Kluges TV could be combined excellently with the hybrid medium HiVision: carefully constructed audio-visions for the intimacy of a bourgeois salon (83). However, he never states why HDTV would enhance a Kluge interview show, or what conventional TV lacks in comparison. In my opinion, shows like Kluges Kulturmagazine represent programs that are constructed to make the most of conventional technologies (for which they were conceived). His shows, as they appear presently, do not require better graphical resolution, a change in image format, or digital mutability. Perhaps lower production costs may be of value. Kluges shows have done relatively well (in terms of critical success) for almost twenty years without HDTV and that may be the best argument yet to stick with the original formula. 34 Elsewhere, Wenders acknowledges and warns of electronic and digital images excessive beauty and accessibility, and comments that it is not necessarily more trustworthy (Act of Seeing 95), but he links

PAGE 93

84 talk given at the IECF in Tokyo Wenders made specific comments on his use of HDTV in Until the End of the World and his vision for this mediums future. He stated: High Vision could balance the loss of reality by the gain in image resolution. [. .] High Vision, and this is my dream, could help to sharpen our sense of reality; my nightmare is if High Definition in the long run only continues to undermine any remaining faith we may have in the truth of images. 35 (On Film 358-59) In Until the End he appears to have turned his own nightmare into a cinematic reality. The films high definition images neither reflect reality (they depict dreams and subjective memories) nor do they evoke faith in any type of true images because they are so highly manipulated. In the rare sequences where the high definition images depict life-like subject matter their content is challenged in other ways. In one of the initial sequences of the film we see Claire, the main protagonist, passing by a large rectangular wall monitor as she is leaving a party. On this monitor plays a music video, some of the very first images of the film shot in high definition video. High definition video is the source material for HDTV, and it is very fitting that the music video depicts a group conspicuously evoking the TV as a medium with its name, the Talking Heads. The term talking heads, a reference to TV usually derogatory in nature, derives from TVs habitual use of the close-up. Although television literally means seeing from a distance, it uses the close-up more frequently than film. UtEotW, however, true to the genre of the road movie, does exactly the opposite, it presents us with many sweeping long-shots of landscape and scenery, it even exhibits shots of the entire globe as viewed from space (as well as stage the globe in fragments consisting of this development primarily to the loss of an original, no more proof of Truth [. .] [causing] the distance between reality and second-hand reality [to be] wider than ever (95). He does not associate the increase of definition with a loss in truth value as Zielinski does. 35 Of course, what Wenders calls a heightening of reality should also be interpreted as an increase in verisimilitude (as Zielinski remarks), since HDTV makes it necessary for make-up specialists, set designers, cinematographers, etc. to pay more attention to detail to retain the illusion of reality.

PAGE 94

85 cities located in five different continents). Wenders has commented in the past that, television has eliminated the long-shot, which so beautifully conforms to the human eye, and replaced it with the tedium of close-ups (On Film 356). It is only within the segments filmed in video that close-ups abound in the film. In other words, the film visually celebrates its otherness, that which sets it apart, from television and (to a lesser degree) from the medium video. As early as 1960, the media theoretician Marshall McLuhan noted that one of the main reasons for TVs abundance of close-ups is tied to its screen size and resolution (314). HDTV, however, with its improved resolution and larger aspect ratio is no longer tied to close-ups. It is bound to change the aesthetics of TV as well as video forever. Wenders, however, appears skeptical in his film. In the filmic techniques employed in UtEotW, Wenders does not treat video as an ally either, but rather showcases it as a rival to what he calls his sacred celluloid images in Notebook on Cities and Clothes. Although high definition videos principal advantage over conventional video is its clarity in images and realistic depiction of that which is filmed, UtEotW primarily uses it for the dream sequences, memory play-backs of recordings showing Edith and Henrys acquaintances and family, and the highly stylized music video-clip. The images that are presented to the viewer in these sequences have undergone drastic manipulation. They are fuzzy, distorted, and not at all representative of their source material. Instead of capturing HDTVs primary improvements over conventional video, Wenders obscures them through another divergence, digital mutability. Also, Wenders foregrounds the digital nature of the recorded dreams and memories, and therefore highlights their constructedness, through various techniques. For example, several of the high-definition images projected onto the

PAGE 95

86 laboratorys large screen appear highly pixilated or are prefaced by a representation of binary digits. Throughout the films staging of HDTV as a technology, a highly negative impression is channeled to the audience. The new technology cannot compete with the traditional recordings which make up the main portion of the film. Images captured on video do not appear real, they remain obvious abstractions of reality. Although Wenders has turned from staunch opponent to avid supporter of video technology in his talks, at least concerning the digital variety, videos output in the form of television has remained a thorn in Wenders artistic side. 36 In an interview with Reinhold Rauh, in response to Rauhs question whether German television is heading in the same deplorable direction for which American TV has paved the way, Wenders goes so far as to declare: On the whole, I think television is becoming unbearablenaked fascism (Excerpts 82). He even connects televisions future course to UtEotWs narrative by calling the mediums development apocalyptic (82). HDTVs association with television and therefore with popular, mass culture, was not only a concern of Wenderss. In order to inspire enthusiasm for their new technology, Japanese television officials invited two European filmmakers, Greenaway and Wenders, both known for their high-brow art films. This decision was surely motivated by the desire to dress up a technology which should not remain associated only with popular culture and the mass medium television. In other words, both directors were summoned to uproot this connection and prove that HDTV has the potential to be a great asset to serious and even non-commercial filmmakers. In the case of Wenders, the complete 36 To be fair, Wenders manages to set apart digital from conventional video and redeem the former somewhat through an ironic twist in the narrative. In the film digital tapes are not affected by the satellite disaster, conventional video would have failed, of course, due to its electro-magnetic nature.

PAGE 96

87 opposite emerged in the final product; his film highlights rather than obscures HDTVs relationship to television (in the same way that his earlier video recordings retained their TV references). Greenaways implementation of HDTV in Prosperos Books, on the other hand, appears much different from Wenderss treatment. The British director seamlessly integrates the technology into his film. It does not remain, as in Wenderss Until the End of the World, set apart as a distinctive medium. The British director most likely bases his synthesizing technique on his general attitude toward cinema. As Rees explains in History of Experimental Film and Video: For Greenaway, Cinema is the sum total of all technologies which work towards articulating the moving image. Cinema is a continuum. It embraces equally the big movie and the computer screen, the digital image and the hand-made film [. .] (4-5). In other words, HDTV represents only one tool of many for Greenaway to realize his cinema and does or even should not be seen as a medium in and of itself when it appears in his film. Although Wenders does not paint HDTV in the best possible light in his film, there are moments when the mediums superiority over film emerges from obscurity into the foreground. The sequences that take place in China, for example, appear as video recordings, within the narrative and in technical terms. Wenders learns one of the advantages of video over film equipment first hand during these shoots. The director was refused permission to set up his film crew in China, which led Solveig Dommartin to film the segments there by herself on the compact, mobile, and user-friendly video camera (anyone can do it after all). These sequences are woven into the narrative as videofaxes from Claire to Gene. However, the recordings contain inconsequential, anecdotal information disassociated from the narrative. They appear to only serve one of two

PAGE 97

88 functions, either to highlight how unrefined and careless the video shots are compared to the rest of the film, or to accentuate the compactness and portability of video as a recording medium (or perhaps a bit of both). Since the images exhibit little or no narrative function in the film, they stand out as a directorial comment on the technology itself. But again, Wenderss point of view appears highly ambivalent. Apart from Wenderss concerns regarding televisions aesthetic influence on film practices, his comments in the past also point toward televisions commercialization as a well for potential corruption. He claims: The close ties between television and advertising have also done much to shapeand deformthe language of television. In short: video culture has undermined and largely destroyed its predecessors language. Films nowadays look almost indistinguishable from television productions [. .], the audience is so accustomed to TV pictures that it now expects them even in films. [. .] television has replaced cinema by [sic] something inferior. (On Film 357) For Wenders, the commercialization of television has by extension also affected the cinema, because, in the directors opinion, television has been exerting such noticeable influence on films. Elsewhere, he laments the disappearance of film images that serve a narrative function and claims, not without good reason, that today, images have to sell, not tell (Excerpts 86). His position is however contradictory, since he cannot exclude himself and his own practices from the commercialization of cinema. On the contrary, compared to other German directors, he has emerged as the master in the art of cross-media promotion, plugging his filmic work via soundtracks, books and photographs, and he has even sold his own image (marketed as director) to American Express. 37 37 In this advertisement, Wenders is depicted sitting in a car with his arm leisurely draped over the steering wheel, making reference to his predeliction for using the road movie film genre.

PAGE 98

89 Furthermore, as Baier points out, in the 1980s Wenders distinguished himself from other directors by making product placement (using Camel cigarettes in Paris, Texas) an acceptable practice in an otherwise non-commercial film (114). In recent years, however, Wenders goes one step further and, not unlike his reversal of opinion concerning video, finds a whole new way to relate to advertising. In a 2001 Der Spiegel interview, Wenders remarks that prior to the 1980s Ingmar Bergman and Frederico Fellini still had to make advertisements in secret, and even Woody Allen was still embarrassed about his first spots. Today, commercials are in many ways the avantgarde of visual art(Himmel). 38 Of course, Wim Wenders has been filming commercials himself since 1994 and therefore would appear as a hypocrite (not to mention inhibiting his potential for reaping profit) if he continued his anti-advertising diatribe. Perhaps RMPs 1999 merger with the digital production company Das Werk helped him overcome his antipathy since Das Werk has such close ties to the advertising world (it emerged from an advertising background to develop its current film repertoire and also owns a majority stake in a German TV production company). One of its founding members, Wolfgang Borgfeld, contends, moreover, that digital video developments, especially digital effects, were and still are primarily driven by the advertising industry in Germany and the rest of Europe (West). With these new business partners and himself emerged in commercial practices, Wenderss relationship to television has slowly turned from black & white to shades of gray. It is not surprising then that the director turns from condemning television to foregrounding another misuse of video in his subsequent film, The End of Violence, namely video as a surveillance apparatus. 38 In the original: [Vor den 80er Jahren] mussten Ingmar Bergman und Federico Fellini noch heimlich Werbung machen, auch Woody Allen hat sich fr seine ersten Spots noch geschmt. Heute sind die Werbefilme in vieler Hinsicht eine Avantgarde der visuellen Kunst.

PAGE 99

90 Video Recording as an Act of Violence: Wenders on Surveillance The perfect disciplinary apparatus would make it possible for a single gaze to see everything constantly. Michel Foucault, Discipline and Punish Surveillance as a topic provides a rich source for a critique of new media, and Wenderss depiction of such techniques and equipment in The End of Violence warrants mention. For, with this film the director enters into an already existing lively debate concerning the merits and dangers of surveillance as a technology and social apparatus. As surveillance technology matured and came to be rather sophisticated in the 20 th century, especially after World War II, it also entered critical discourse as a hotly debated topic. 39 Since then it has remained an intriguing issue with discussions ranging from the panopticon to dataveillance, and more recently, after September 11, in the U.S., covering various types of increased security measures and in Germany including the practice of Rasterfahndung. 40 Surveillance has emerged as a theme in several genre of artistic works and various types of media as well, such as George Orwells 1984 (fiction novel), Raimond Depardons Reporters (non-fiction film), Vito Acconcis Following Pieces (performance), Rem Koolhas Project for the Renovation of a Panoptic Prison 39 William Bogard points out that even Marx displayed an interest in surveillance with its capacity to assist supervisors in managing labor practices (a facet of Taylorism comically treated in Modern Times in a scene where even the bathroom is monitored by the factory supervisor). Furthermore, according to Bogard, Max Webers theories concerning surveillance as a tool of bureaucratic control over individuals have played a particularly influential role on twentieth-century academic surveillance studies (17-18). Important literature on surveillance includes David Burnhams The Rise of the Computer State (1983), Christopher Dandekers Surveillance, Power, and Modernity (1990), Michel Foucaults Discipline and Punish (1979) and The Birth of the Clinic (1975), R. Howards Brave New Workplace (1985), David Lyons The Electronic Eye: The Rise of Surveillance Society (1994), Steven Nocks The Cost of Privacy: Surveillance and Reputation in America (1993) and James Rules Private Lives. Public Surveillance (1973). 40 Rasterfahndung is a practice that dates back to Germanys problems with terrorism in the 1970 and has been rediscovered after September 11 as a tool against potential Islamic terrorists living in Germany. This system aims at discovering so-called terrorist sleepers, agents that are waiting for their deployment. Rasterfahndung employs specific information from university databases and other public sources to seek out individuals that, because they fit into a certain profile, may be terrorists in waiting.

PAGE 100

91 (architecture), Josh Harriss we-live-in-public.com (net installation), Peter Weibels The Panoptic Society or Immortially in Love with Death (interactive DVD-ROM), or the Big Brother TV-series, etc. Recently, the topic also featured prominently in the exhibition CTRL [SPACE] (October 2001) curated by Thomas Y. Levin at the Zentrum fr Kunst und Medientechnologie in Karlsruhe. Wenders enters into this lively discourse and postulates his own theory concerning the practice of surveillance and the technology involved in the methods employed. As depicted in Wenderss film, surveillance equipment was once predominantly invisible and used as a tool of public law enforcement. Unmasking or revealing such equipment represented an effective subversive act against the powers-that-be. However, these actions have lost much of their bite in what could be called a new era of surveillance, in terms of technology as well as public attitude. Much of the current surveillance apparatus in existence has become visible and integrated into daily life. Commercial and private equipment far outnumbers governmental equipment. A survey of Manhattan in 1998 revealed that of ca. 2400 security cameras only 10% were not part of a commercial installation, and of that 10% belonged to private entities (Murphy). Also, because hidden surveillance cannot be as effective unless it includes a large supervisory body, principles of the panopticon are preferred. They operate more efficiently since they utilize a preventative approach through the constant possibility of observation rather than the cost-intensive practice of total coverage. Computer profiling, stereotyping on the basis of prior actions and/or personal traits, also functions preemptively as a kind of surveillance in advance of surveillance, a technology of

PAGE 101

92 observation before the fact (Bogard 27). 41 The act of surveillance has lost some of its conspiratory edge over the years (and therefore also surrendered narrative allure) with the general public readily giving up all kinds of personal information over the Internet or eagerly sacrificing anonymity to feel safe at airports, on planes, or in other public spaces. Additionally, most surveillance systems are employed as a form of property protection by companies or private individuals, rather than constituting part of any governmentally supervised project, and therefore are supported as an acceptable practice by the public as a whole. Ybor City in Tampa, Florida, serves as an exemplary case in point. The city recently implemented a surveillance system which utilizes a new type of face-recognition software. Tampas once crime-ridden nightlife district is now under constant watch using Visionicss FaceIt technology which scans the faces of all visitors and analyzes the facial features captured on the images against a database of 30,000 pictures listing runaways and people with a criminal record. Although there exists some dissent among the locals and the tourists, most have accepted and even support the practice. The same technology is now being installed in airports, at major sporting events, casinos, and at voting booths. As William G. Staples, a sociology professor at the University of Kansas, notes, public attitude about surveillance practices have changed over the years and outrage about the infringement of civil liberties tends to originate with an older generation. Younger people he has interviewed tend to be less sensitive about issues of privacy; they have been desensitized by recordings such as the Rodney King beating and reality television shows like Big Brother which turn surveillance into 41 Bogard makes a special case of the simulation of surveillance as becoming the new generation of surveillance techniques and technology. He argues that actual (traditional) surveillance acts are increasingly replaced by virtual, simulated (digitally-driven) practices, where the latter are not about creating an illusion of surveillance, but about rendering indiscernible [. .] the fact of its illusion (31-32).

PAGE 102

93 voyeuristic pleasures. Add to this, says Staples, the terrorist acts of September 11, and you get a sense that it is unpatriotic and close to an act of treason to oppose technologies of surveillance (Murphy). Although reality television shows and terrorist acts belong to a post-The End of Violence time, such sensibilities were already well on their way in 1997 to become firmly established in society. Another technology that has made headlines in the last couple of years is the FBI's Carnivore surveillance tool. Carnivore is a combination hardware and software-based system used to examine all packets send from and to a particular Internet Protocol (or ISP) and record segments that meet specific parameters; it is used as an electronic wire-tapping device. Specific parameters allow the FBI to identify a persons messages to the exclusion of all others. In the optimal case scenario, agents are able to intercept and collect communications which are the subject of a court order while ignoring those communications which they are not authorized to intercept. Carnivore can search e-mail, newsgroups, and chat programs, monitor online shopping, file transfers, and downloading behavior, etc.. In short, it can pervade all areas of Internet communication. Apart from Carnivore, there are several similar systems operating or in development which have civil liberties organizations crying in outrage. Echelon is another, similar interception system to Carnivore, which acts through a global network of computers that automatically search through millions of electronic communication for pre-programmed keywords in messages, or identify fax, telex and e-mail addresses. 42 As these examples show, the face of surveillance has changed much over recent years and, with the rapid 42 The vast influx of surveillance technology has prompted vigorous dissent from the European Parliament. In addition to considering general privacy issues, the Parliament warns of the risk for abuse of economic information, such as aiding industrial espionage. The complete report from 1999 is available at: http://www.fas.org/irp/program/process/docs/98-14-01-4en.pdf (Elliot) and an assessment of interception capabilities from 2000 at http://www.fas.org/irp/eprint/ic2000/ic2000.htm (Campbell).

PAGE 103

94 advancement of digital technology, promises to do so even more dramatically in the future. In Wenderss UtEotW surveillance appears as a paradoxical element, in some instances saving the world from environmental polluters and in other scenes posing as an unwelcome intruder upon personal privacy. The End of Violence picks up on the tropes initiated in UtEotW and the director further develops his practical treatment of image technology (still frequently undermining his own theoretical conceptions). As in Wenderss earlier films Lightening, Chambre 666, Notebooks, and UtEotW, Wenders turns to the topic of videos possible (near-future) function in society, this time situated in the US, more specifically in Hollywood whose raison dtre, of course, is image production. Once again, paralleling the mood of UtEotW, Wenderss outlook is anything but rosy as the narrative discloses. One of the main protagonists winds up murdered for his involvement in video surveillance, the other, because he is informed of the project, narrowly escapes an assassination attempt. The video images themselves, collected by an ubiquitous surveillance system throughout Los Angeles, are supposed to be able to reveal everything that goes on in the city and even bring about the end of violence. 43 However, in the critical moments of the film where the images would have been able to prevent a crime, the monitors fail due to human intervention. Wenderss vision of the state of civil liberties in the near future proves to be a decidedly modernist one. As early as 1974, Enzensberger argues that 43 The surveillance system in the film looks clich and simplistic. Especially when Rays supervisor appears on all screens to interrupt his clandestine investigation of an apparent crime scene. A system which keeps taps on virtually all of Los Angeles, even in the early developmental stages, would certainly have to possess more sophisticated equipment and a much larger workforce.

PAGE 104

95 the possibility of total control of a system [like George Orwells monolithic consciousness industry] at a central point belongs not to the future but to the past [. .]it can be demonstrated that a linked series of communications [. .], to the degree that it exceeds a certain critical size, can no longer be centrally controlled but only dealt with statistically [. .], blanket supervision would demand a monitor bigger than the system itself. (Constituents 64) For Enzensberger, the lack of total possible control represents a point of potential leakage which can aid in an attempt of breaking down such a system (from within the system). Wenderss The End of Violence, however, depicts the surveillance network as inherently infallible and near-hermetically sealed. 44 Both agents, the scientist and director, who dare to defy it fail and are punished in their attempts to intervene. In the film Wenders posits that a revolt against the prevailing system can only be successful through an alternative route. The End of Violence stages this alternative as a war waged (and possibly won) with words. The coup detat begins with a rappers sudden enlightenment and turns him from gangster rapper to political activist (without any believable motivation to be sure). The suggested solution, turning the fight of violence from video to poetry, appears to be a similar anti-technological stance as the one depicted in UtEotW. In the latter, it was literature and the oral culture of the Aborigines that cured a similar evil gone awry in modern technological society: the ubiquity of images. With these narrative choices Wenders wants to highlight the importance that agency plays in the act of surveillance, but unconvincingly implicates video technology in the mis-deeds which he presents. Presumably, Wenders sees poetry and literature as technologies which are less dependent on institutional constraints and therefore less affected by agency, in 44 In this film, as was the case for UtEotW, satellite technology plays an important as well as ambivalent role. The satellite can be a positive technological advancement when it helps in tracking environmental pollution (in UtEotW) or a negative one, as a potential time bomb threatening to destroy the world as we know it (also in UtEotW) and as a tool of power enforcing the systems control over the individual (in The End of Violence).

PAGE 105

96 contrast to cinema and television. These uncorrupted entities can apparently still redeem a society polluted by too many and the wrong kind of images. Aside from the questionable logic underlying such statements, it is important to remember that Wenders conveys his assessment of modern society via the same image-making technologies which he critiques in his films, using both film and video. He never acknowledges this predicament or thematizes the difficulties of escaping or even objectively critiquing what is produced within the medium itself; in other words, how productive can it be to try to battle the potential violence contained in and produced by image technologies (as in The End of Violence) or (in UtEotW) societys image saturation with more images. Although Wenderss film The End of Violence picks up on an important theme which has become a defining element of modern society, he fails to tap into current surveillance sensibilities; his approach seems dated and out-of-touch with actual, feasible practices. Most importantly, video, for the most part, has been replaced by digital technologies in surveillance systems because the latter can more effectively gather and interpret information about a large body of people or practices, mostly through statistical analysis and database searches. Wenders addresses this new type of surveillance only once in the narrative, when an e-mail and accompanying attachment serve to uncover the potentially subversive liaison between the scientist Ray Bering and the director Max Meyers (perhaps intercepted by Carnivore?). The remainder of the film focuses on the video system and the powers that use and abuse it. The End of Violence, however, could have potentially contained another, much more interesting, take on the films main theme (and title), which Wenders himself has

PAGE 106

97 mentioned before in interviews: the connection between films, filming and violence. 45 He comments: Film is an act of violence, or threatens to become one at every stage of making a film. Lets begin at the end: when the film is finished, it becomes an act of violence in the moment it is shown, an act of violence insofar as the danger exists that it takes away the spectators freedom to see something, dictating rather to them what they have to see. (Excerpts 70) However, in The End of Violence the director appears to simply echo familiar (and unproven) concerns that link the act of watching films and television, as well as playing computer games or listening to violent rap lyrics, with violent social behavior. Unlike in his comments above, he fails to extend the connection into a much more elusive and diffuse realm, that of the act of filmmaking itself and to include himself in the equation. The End of Violence points toward the violence depicted in the action movies of Mike Max and in the gangster RAP of Six O One as the sole antagonistic source for the films theme. Although the narrative also implicates the video surveillance system in acts of violence (which is supposed to eradicate crime), namely the kidnapping of Max and subsequent murder of the would-be kidnappers, it is the medium video, not film, that records the scene (and later fails to preserve it). There is neither mention of human intervention (filmmaker as agent) nor any allusion to The End of Violence itself as perpetuating certain behavior. Again, Wenderss theoretical convictions collapse under the weight of their practical employment. In light of Wenderss superficial treatment of the multifaceted topic of violence, his anachronistic depiction of surveillance, and his 45 There have been a number of films to examine this topic from various points of view. Harun Farocki, for example, recently released a non-fiction film I Thought I Was Seeing Convicts (2000) which candidly links shooting with a camera to shooting a gun. The film, like The End of Violence, also deals with a video surveillance system. However, Farocki does not openly discuss the difference or similarity that exist between videotaping and filming and how violence could potentially be depicted and carried out differently (or not) by each medium.

PAGE 107

98 audacious indictment of video as a technology of evil, it is not surprising that the film failed to attain critical as well as commercial success (despite featuring a well-known Hollywood cast). Video, TV, the Artist/Author and the Auteur: Film as Craft/Handwerk Presumably, one of the reasons Wenderss fiction films have been less successful in recent years, both with audiences and critics alike, can be traced to the directors attempt at shaping his fiction films to appeal to a wider-ranging and more international audience. Nonetheless, while turning increasingly popular and mainstream he has concurrently and unsuccessfully attempted to retain a high-brow as well as an auteurist style. According to Andrew Sarris (1962), for any director to be classified an auteur, her or his films must satisfy three conditions: 1) the director must possess a certain technical competence (technique), 2) the films should exhibit the directors unique personality (personal style), and 3) the film should include a specific level of interior meaning which Sarris defines as extrapolated from the tension between a directors personality and his material (586), a quality which can only be expressed with cinematic and not literary tools. Wollen adds to Sarriss definition by stating that individual films by auteur directors exhibiting these distinctive qualities (expressed differently by every auteur) will have less in common with similarly themed films by other directors, than with films from the oeuvre of the same director, no matter what genre or which actors, locations, or film crews are used. 46 While Wenderss fiction films of the nineties and those of the last two years are obviously aimed at a broader audience base than most of his films of the seventies and 46 Peter Wollen makes a particularly convincing case of this conception in his Signs and Meaning in the Cinema (1970) where he reads the films of Howard Hawks across many genres and over several decades as auteur films (Auteur).

PAGE 108

99 eighties were, this does not automatically diminish their potential for being classified auteur films. On the contrary, auteur theory in general is less concerned with the commercial appeal of a picture than it is with identifying theme and style as a particular directors signature. To be sure, from its conception, auteur theorys major contribution to the study of film consisted of legitimizing and popularizing the act of treating commercial pictures, often by mainstream Hollywood directors, as works of art worthy of serious critique. In other words, the films of Howard Hawks deserved as much attention as those of the filmmakers working outside of the commercial studio system. What make Wenderss latest cinematic adventures so uninteresting to critics and audiences, are not simply his attempts at appealing to more viewers, but concern the pedestrian thematic and stylistic devices which straddle the boundaries between low and high-brow culture and which cause his films to occupy neither realm comfortably. They are not symptomatic for Wenderss uvre as a whole, but mark a cessation in his approach to filmmaking. For example, in The End of Violence, Page, the wife of a high-power Hollywood producer is in the process of leaving him and gazes longingly through her bedroom window at a bird in a tree. The implication is clear, wife feels trapped and desires freedom, and this metaphorical device may be expected in a popular Hollywood film, directed by someone other than Wenders, but it is far too blunt to impress in a film that tries to appeal to a more demanding audience. Conversely, the high-brow stand-up poetry readings and Edward Hopper references in the same film are clearly targeting a specific audience who would recognize and understand the references and their meanings in the film (and they harmonize with Wenderss usual style). In UtEotW, similar metaphors also miss their mark: as Claire gets jammed up in traffic, she impulsively

PAGE 109

100 leaves the highway system which is mapped out in her automobiles GPS (global positioning system) (as well as her boring, straight-laced life) and concurrently inaugurates both her off-road car trip and her unexpected narrative journeys; in the Japanese mountains, where Claire and Sam retreat from their worldly adventures (a clich in itself), they encounter Mr. More (the actor from Ozus films) who comments, after treating Sams eyes, that the eye does not see the same thing as the heart; and in the final minutes of the film Sam partakes in a magic healing session from the aborigines, when they sleep next to him and take his dreams (nightmares). In the recent The Million Dollar Hotel the clichs abound as well, from the worn-out crazy people are not as crazy as one might think theme to media crews depicted as sharks in a feeding frenzy. But The Million Dollar Hotel also incorporates scenes that address viewers with high-brow cultural knowledge (as does UtEotW) such as the exposition of one of the U.S. art scenes guiding principles (the art dealer can make or brake the product) where the irony may be lost on a general public. As these examples illustrate, in his fiction films Wenders appropriates his past reputation as a German director making non-commercial films to launch a seemingly new career which tries to retain his old status but makes it more palpable to a larger and more international audience. That he fails to reconcile these two objectives is not surprising. Nonetheless Wenderss newly nurtured ambitions to become more popular apply mostly to his fiction films. In his recent non-fiction film Buena Vista Social Club, although international in its subject matter and wide-ranging in its audience appeal, the motifs and metaphors are much more subtle and developed, as would be expected from the auteur Wenders. There, the recurring images of Che Guevara, an icon for revolution,

PAGE 110

101 freedom and idealism, constantly remind the viewer of Cubas great historic as well as continual struggle against American hegemony, capitalism, and other Western influences. The idealism inherent in this iconic reference, however, has also been compromised by the Western world because Che Guevaras image has been commodified to be used in causes that smack of capitalism. As early as 1972, Enzensberger comments that when an office-equipment firm can attempt to recruit sales staff with the picture of Che Guevara and the slogan, We would have hired him, the temptation to withdraw is great, but he also adds that when it comes to manipulation by the media, fear of handling shit is a luxury a sewerman cannot necessarily afford (Constituents 66-67). Wenders attempts to deal with the Che Guevara paradox through interlacing it into his story about long-forgotten, but still immensely talented Cuban musicians resurrected by the American musician Ry Cooder. Rather than overemphasizing (visually and aurally [through the voice-over]), and therefore trivializing, the Che image, Wenders weaves it seamlessly into the visual landscape of Cuba, displayed on T-shirts of passer-bys, evoked by graffiti, and featured in the introductory moments of the film, but only by way of illustrating a Cuban photographers career. Concurrently, the landscape of Havana, littered with relics of a past American occupation in the form of automobiles from the 50s, suggests Cubas struggle to grow economically, on its own and cut off from most of the global economy, as well as its nostalgic relationship to a pre-revolution Cuba. Wenderss suggestive images appropriately complicate these conflicting aspects of Cubas past and present. This example suggests that Wenderss attempts to increase the popular appeal of his fiction films do so at the expense of his talent and unique style as a filmmaker. In his non-fiction feature Buena Vista Social Club he may not have felt the urge to reach a large

PAGE 111

102 audience, given that non-fiction film is generally conceived as a genre limited in audience appeal. Ironically, Buena Vista performed well with both, audiences and critics, making it a more successful film overall than his recent, relatively high-budget, features. Apart from using more popular actors, subject matter, and themes, Wenderss use of digital video in his films and music clips has also had a noticeable impact on his image and work as a director with auteur status. Naturally, the lower production and post-production costs of digital video and HDTV lesson filmmakers dependency on commercial and private funding and therefore can yield a product which closely resembles the directors vision. However, funding concerns have not impaired the auteurs of Hollywood, in the past as well as present, and their distinguished technique, style, and what Sarris calls interior meaning prevailed. This perseverance can very well be attributed to what Wollen calls the structure of a film. He argues: The structure is associated with a single director, an individual, not because he has played the role of artist, expressing himself or his own vision in the cinema, but because it is through the force of his preoccupations with an unconscious, unintended meaning can be decoded in the film, usually to the surprise of the individual involved. The film is not a communication, but an artefact which is unconsciously structured in a certain way. (Auteur 602) With Wenderss latest films, however, it is too often his vision that takes precedent and overshadows his talents as a director. Specifically, it is his latest visualization of the future of cinema, ridden with technological anxiety, that has inspired him to abandon proven techniques and has jeopardized his status as an auteur. Rather than focusing on the whole of what defines an auteur, Wenders has been preoccupied with only one aspect, that of individual and unique creator of a work of art. The directors anxiety about video as an artistic medium may well be rooted in a more general trend of devaluation of the author which is often seen as a symptom of

PAGE 112

103 postmodern society. David Harvey, in The Condition of Postmodernity, explains that when cultural producers become less esteemed in society it opens up the possibility for popular participation in art and re-determination of cultural values by the masses. This democratization of artistic production may lead to what Harvey calls incoherence or vulnerability to mass-market manipulation (51). Jameson argues furthermore that mechanical depersonalization (or decentering of the subject) goes even further in the new medium [video], where the auteurs themselves are dissolved along with the spectator [. .] (Postmodernism 74) and adds that an auteur theory connected to video would be a highly unlikely prospect (78). When Wenders mentions that anyone can do it, meaning anyone can use a video camera, he evidently reacts to these views and sees video employed as an artistic medium to be a threat to the authors status in society. Indeed, in the early years, traditional video technology favored a partially anti-auteur style. During the initial period of development, high quality video equipment necessitated collaboration by several artists due to the prohibitive costs involved, elevating the vision of the group over any individual artist. It was not until much later that the technology was available to single artists because costs steadily declined. In fact, most political activist videos in Germany during the seventies produced their work as part of a collective and without special emphasis on single authors or producersas a group effort rather than an individual achievement (Roth 220). It represented a political art forum which had the potential of supplanting the Autorenfilm. At the same time, however, videos technological make-up also supported the work of auteurs. Bundschuh argues (in the 1980s) that video, because of its low cost and practical employment, can lead to more innovative and creative shots, the camera can continue to be curious when

PAGE 113

104 conventional filming would have stopped (203-204). Therefore auteurs of cinema could more easily realize their individual visions on video. He adds that video offers filmmakers the freedom to make films that do not follow mainstream conventions (Video bietet heute noch die Chance, Filme anders zu machen) (210). In other words, it is precisely video technology which can make it possible to combat a TV aesthetic if one so desires (and Wenders professes that he does). As with traditional video, the cost-cutting features of HDTV in production and post-production in comparison to traditional 35mm film make it much easier for independent filmmakers to make high quality and autonomous pictures. Although this technology cannot create an auteur, it can help bring to the surface the auteurs signature. Digital video technology, therefore, supports aspects of boththe return as well as the disappearance of the author. On the one hand, as Elsaesser argues, digital cinema marks the return of the artist as source and origin of the image, because primary expression which is bearing the imprint and signature of the creator can replace reproduction (mimesis) (Digital Cinema 206). On the other hand, Lev Manovich has noted that the very distinction between creation and modification, so clear in film-based media (shooting versus darkroom processes in photography, production versus postproduction in cinema), no longer applies to digital cinema, since each image, regardless of its origin, goes through a number of programs before making it to the final film (302). The tendency of the digital image to redefine concepts of original, real, authenticity, and authorship has important ramifications for a director who still maintains the position of being an auteur (On Film 288) and seeks images that contain

PAGE 114

105 truths (327). However, it is important to note that auteur theory, as stated above, includes much more than the director as the principle creator of an original work of art. Nonetheless, it is this aspect that troubles Wenderss filmmaking effort the most. Even in connection with conventional technology, Wenders makes it clear that auteur-cinema and video cannot be reconciled easily, because he sees the latter as democratic dilettantism, (352) an act which can be performed by any novice (see opening quote)unlike film equipment which is only available to professionals. 47 What Wenders calls democratic dilettantism, was in the early years of video considered to be one of the mediums greatest assets. Enzensberger goes so far as to say that potentially, electronic media (such as video) are egalitarian in nature and conceivably do away [. .] with the cultural monopoly of the bourgeois intelligentsia (Constituents 69). Such utopian sentiments have long since become cultural relics. Even Enzensberger who initially viewed video as an effective and democratic political tool qualified if not retracted his statements later when he calls one manifestation of video, television as it exists in Germany in the 1980s, a Nullmedium, (zero medium) with absolute no program content whatsoever (Nullmedium). Instead of nurturing his own individual approach to film, Wenders tries to work through his anxieties concerning the perceived impending threat of auteurs extinction by constructing narratives and using technologies that stage and support the auteurs comeback. As previously mentioned, in Notebooks Wenders experiences a moment of conversion regarding video technology. He comments [video] allowed me to make 47 This attitude parallels Jean Baudrillards critique of Enzensbergers and Brechts evaluation of radio as a reciprocal medium. For Baudrillard, the two-way communication ability of a medium does not guarantee its revolutionary potential (reversibility does not equal reciprocity). Instead, he argues, the quality of communication has to be evaluated in each individual case to separate genuine messages from feedback and an influx of dilettantism (referenced in Uecker 43).

PAGE 115

106 everything more or less by myself which, as Alter correctly infers, enable[s] him to keep on playing the authors role, practicing authorship in the form of affirmed identity and control (131). In the narrative of capturing the designer Yamamoto create his newest fashion line, the voice-over emphasizes the gap between designing and manufacturing clothes for the international market and those destined for domestic consumers. In his Japanese collection, Yamamoto is called a craftsman and his assistants the guardian angels of an author (On Film 373). Wenders is obviously alluding to the similarity of Yamamotos status as creator of clothes to Wenders as an author of films, an auteur. This simile can then be expanded and extended to the films subplot which has as its theme the tension that exists between video and film images. Just as fashion, a consumer product, can be redeemed by artistic intention, video, a mass commodity in its own right, can also be raised in value through artistic intervention. Wenders has shifted the emphasis effectively from the medium to the artist; it is not so much what video can do but what can be done with it. When Wenders uses the term craft (in German Handwerk) he betrays his convictions to be informed by German cultural institutions and by a concomitant value system. Handwerk is a concept which has featured prominently in recent German history, as an essential element in German economical developments and social history. Wenders blurs the boundary between artist and artisan which are both valued in society in their own unique way. However, in his fiction films, the lines are drawn clearly and heavily in favor of the artist. In UtEotW, Wim Wenders attempts to foreground his unique style as an auteur by using new technologies and including one-of-a-kind artifacts. Using the science fiction genre allows Wenders to strive for originality in soundtrack, technology, fashion, and

PAGE 116

107 imagery. He commissioned sixteen original songs from as many musicians, such as U2, Sinead OConnor, etc., and even uncovered a never released song from the deceased artist Roy Orbison. For Claire and Sams wardrobe he commissioned original designs from Yoshi Yamamoto (the fashion designer from Notebooks). Of course, as a newly developing technology, the HDTV images serve as a highlight in the films original features. Through these devices Wenders ostensibly tries to distance himself from the common cinema of Hollywood. In 1995 Wenders displaces his artistic anxiety from the cinema to the much more accommodating world of painting. Wenderss introduction into the art scene originally occurred via traditional painting. After UtEotW, he revisits these roots but this time with digital paintings. At the 45 th Venice Biennale Wenders displays UtEotW film stills as any traditional artist would exhibit traditional paintings; new technology is cloaked in old aesthetics and therefore elevated into the realm of high-culture. After all, it is there that autonomous artists with a defining style, can still be celebrated seemingly unfettered by new technologies. Wenderss concerns regarding television, film and the fate of the auteur, are not singular in the context of German Autorenfilm. Another German auteur, Alexander Kluge (unlike Wenders) has been using cable television as a creative medium to further his public sphere project since 1988 with Kulturmagazine shows such as 10 vor 11 and Primetime/Sptausgabe on RTL, with News & Stories on SAT.1, and with Mitternachtsmagazin on VOX. His experiments, sometimes called kluges Fernsehen (smart TV), commenced in 1985, when he founded the Arbeitsgemeinschaft Kabel und Satellit (AKS) which later, in cooperation with the Japanese advertising firm Dentsu and

PAGE 117

108 the Spiegel-Verlag, turned into the TV production company DCTP (Development Company for Television Programs). Since 1988, he has almost exclusively turned to television as a creative outlet and his film and literary works have become scarce. In television, Kluge has found a medium to further pursue his notion of a productive public sphere (based on Habermass theories). This sphere calls for democratic societies to provide spaces in which information can circulate, an unfettered exchange of opinion and ideas is guaranteed, and public debates are actively encouraged. This space should exist independently of the state and remain isolated from private and corporate interests. Despite the fact that this type of public sphere appears antagonistic to the norms of commercial television, Kluge has managed to carve himself a niche which has enabled him to realize his ideological goals. Although viewer ratings for his programs are dismal, he is allowed to continue his experiments through special provisions which German law attaches to television channels. In addition to pursuing his public sphere project, Kluge also insists that no matter which medium he employs in his productions, he will always and foremost be an auteur. With much enthusiasm and ideological fervor he poses the question Why shouldnt there be a TV for the auteur? (Kluge). For Kluge, cooperation/collaboration between TV and film seems more productive than simple enmity, and he set out to establish a relationship where television and the cinema could be used as venues for each others wares, especially in cases when a format does not fit into the parameters or conventions of the specific medium (Uecker 34), e.g., a film of unconventional length. Although, like Wenders, Alexander Kluge is not ready to give up his status as elite cultural producer, he represents a point at the opposite end of the creative spectrum from Wenders. He proves that television can provide a platform from

PAGE 118

109 which to launch any political and artistic project, no matter how politically progressive or anti-capitalistic its message. 48 Ironically, had Wenders accepted television as a medium worthy of his relatively high-budget film Until the End of the World, he may have profited from some of its medium-specific advantages over film. One such advantage lies in its capability to tell stories in serial format. This allows for immense character and plot development, whereas films rarely risk going over the 2 hour maximum time frame for features. Wenders, whose director-cut film is almost 5 hours long and therefore hasnt been shown to a wider public, would have benefited from this feature. Other German directors, and Wenders contemporaries in New German Cinema, have taken advantage of this television peculiarity in the past and fared extremely well, such as Edgar Reitzs acclaimed Heimat series or Fassbinders Berlin Alexanderplatz miniseries. Conclusion: Technology and the Difficulty of Representing History/Memory Abandoning German-ness I was deeply moved by seeing and feeling that Germany, because it isnt me any more, Im a cosmopolite now. Wim Wenders, On Film Wenders fashions the near-future science fiction world of Until the End of the World so as to play down and possibly even eliminate national borders. Claire, Sam, Gene, the detective Winter, and the Australian bounty hunter effortlessly move from one country to the next. Although Sams passport is mentioned once as a tracking device, no 48 For a detailed and well-informed analysis of Alexander Kluges television projects see Ueckers Alexander Kluge: Anti-Fernsehen? Alexander Kluges Fernsehproduktion and Christian Schulte and Winfried Sieberss (ed.), Kluges Fernsehen. Alexander Kluges Kulturmagazine.

PAGE 119

110 one in the film ever openly acknowledges his or her nationality. 49 Economies have merged as well it seems with the chief and shared unit of exchange being credit. In UtEotW, Wenders makes a candid attempt at producing a film that could be called an international portrait. He employs French, German, Australian, American, and Japanese actors, films his scenes on several continents, appropriates several languages, and taps into regional sensibilities (such as the Aborigine culture or Japanese hotel practices) of his film locales. 50 Producing a film that attempts to unite the world through stories and images is not without its creative perils, however. As Baier correctly points out, Wenders uses his film to make questionable statements about certain nations and nationals, such as using an Indian satellite in the catastrophe to end the world, or the Japanese encounter in the hotel in Tokyo. In the former case Wenders feeds stereotypical assumptions that developing countries are less sophisticated with technology than their first-world counterparts and therefore dangerous (and should not be trusted with such devices). In the latter example, he depicts Japanese men as sex-crazed maniacs masturbating in front of TVs and attempting to grope Solveig Dommartins character as she runs by (99-100). The only constant in Claire and Sams travels are not the places they visit but the use of 49 However, Wenders fails in his attempt to collapse the world into one place to some degree due to his rootedness in present day concerns. If his hero still uses a passport, clear national boundaries obviously remain (unlike in present-day Europe where passports from individual countries no longer have to be checked in that region). And if the Vietnamese have developed superior computer chips, there also still exists nationally defined competition in the global marketplace, not one economy as suggested by the single currency. One could also argue that the specific usage of flagship cities of each country, Venice, Paris, Berlin, Lisbon, Moscow, Peking, Tokyo, and San Francisco, visited in UtEotW, highlights the fact that there are still many individual and familiar countries, necessitating the crossing of national borders, and highlighting the existence of linguistic barriers reified by different languages. 50 Space, on the other hand, appears as a highly subjective matter. In Australia for example, a country of vast proportions, space seems to collapse when the films characters interact there. They all meet up in highly unlikely coincidences.

PAGE 120

111 identically high-tech gadgets throughout the world. 51 Of course technology, in general, may bridge borders but it cannot always erase national specificity (on the contrary, it sometimes enforces it, as in the case of region-specific video standards and DVD region encoding). It appears ironic that a tale so intend on collapsing national borders and economies features a medium that has struggled for twenty years, and still is to some degree today, with political and financial disputes among countries. These struggles are the main reason that HDTV has not yet become as common in domestic and professional circles as TVs, VCRs or camcorders. Although HDTV, coded in binary language, has the potential for a universal format, national concerns have so far hindered its success. In Until the End of the World HDTV is not given a fair chance either. With Wenders, however, it is not a political or economic issue but artistic anxiety that fetters the technology. In almost all of Wenderss films, the director has put forth considerable effort to infuse his career with international allure and to separate himself from his German artistic background. Several of his films feature locations outside of Germany, French and American actors, use genres of other national cinemas, such as Hollywood, and employ soundtracks that appeal to an international audience. In the last decade, however, his films have become conspicuously pre-occupied with flaunting themselves as international productions. Apart from UtEotW, in 1994, Wenders directed Lisbon Story, in 1995, he co-directed (with Antonioni) Beyond the Clouds, which was followed by The End of Violence in 1997, Buena Vista Social Club in 1999, and The Million Dollar Hotel in 2000. These films all share international localities, non-German languages, an 51 Wenders uses gadgets that are new commercial products in his other films as well, e.g., Polaroid photography, videogames, walkie-talkies, walkmans, etc.

PAGE 121

112 international cast, and storylines that provide no clues as to the directors nationality. In his website biography, Wenders makes a point of highlighting his separation from New German Cinema and the Filmverlag der Autoren, two entities closely tied to his national German identity. The website reads with the release of Paris, Texas in Germany, Wenders began to diverge from the Filmverlag der Autoren, deciding to end his partnership (Wim Wenders Bio) and he adds in a letter to the Sddeutsche Zeitung the Filmverlag der Autoren is [. .] [a] team I dont want to play for any more (On Film 227). The split from New German Cinema and the Filmverlag occurred principally over the distribution rights to Paris, Texas and the manner in which the Filmverlag managed financial matters in general. This separation proved to be more than a simple business dispute, however, it launched him into a career that diverged more and more from his country of artistic origin. His use of new imaging technologies, especially the format of digital video, has aided this development tremendously. Recording the Past and Future on Video and Film Films exist in that crevice between past and present. Wim Wenders, On Film Video as a technology, especially in its institutionalized form of television, has left many artists and critics with the impression that it is inextricable linked to immediacy, ubiquity, and not always bound to veracity. Marita Sturken explains this phenomenon convincingly with the following assertion: The television image is the copy with no originalit is many images everywhere at the same time. It is coded not only as live (there are many conventions in television that make it appear live when it is actually prerecorded) but also as continuous and immediate (120). She goes on to add, many early videomakers were responding to precisely this aspect of immediacy, with the

PAGE 122

113 attitude that tape was ephemeral and instant, the now. [. .] Thus, the very nature of television technology, in its materiality, acts as a negation of history, and this negation forces us to redefine and reconceptualize the notion of what constitutes the past (121). These anti-historical tendencies of video as a medium become amplified when combined with digital technology. Digital video completely eliminates any notion of an original, or an authoritative, singular source. But digital video, especially HDTV, has also bridged the gap between standard definition television/video and cinema (which is more readily seen as a source of truth and meaningful contemplation) Most importantly for the future of technological convergence, HDTV will link TV, video and computers due to a shared binary language. In this move toward convergence, can video become the definitive representational medium to disseminate images of all types, those relating to the present and past? As Sturken further notes, televisions live image can be transmitted to several places at once regardless of distance. It is capable of instant replay and real-time recording. Therefore, she argues, its ubiquity and immediacy prevents it from being perceived or used as a system suited for archival storage (103). Frederic Jameson also states more specifically that memory seems to play no role in television, commercial or otherwise (Jameson Postmodernism 70). If TV cannot function as a system capable of preserving information such as personal histories (memories) or public historical discourse adequately, it would stand to reason that HDTV, by extension, cannot do so either. Wenders picks up on this notion in UtEotW to include it into a narrative which deals predominantly with the recording of memories. Again, it appears as if HDTVs close relations with TV are what inhibit Wenders to embrace it wholeheartedly. In

PAGE 123

114 UtEotW Wenderss protagonists attempt to use a high-tech camera, in actuality a device which stands in as the producer for most of the HDTV images in the film, as a medium potentially capable of transmitting the recording of images stemming from recalled memories (the recording of physical reality in conjunction with the brain activity involved in recording and recalling the images). In the narrative, Sam Farber uses the futuristic camera to follow a trail his own parents made when they were escaping the Nazis. Edith tells Claire about how she met Henry while they were fleeing from Germany and that the entire journey which Sam undertakes, with Claire in tow, is a repeat of his parents adventure. Only in the films present Sam is running from the American government whereas his parents had as their enemies the Nazis. By extension, the viewers partake in this secondary re-living of the past via the narrative and the cameras recordings. The theme of experiencing and re-experiencing becomes a leitmotif in the film, one which also applies to the function of the camera. In the process of making the recorded images visible to the blind viewer, the recording subject must go through, as Wenders describes it, an act of re-seeing, of recognition, of memory (On Film 301). The audience as well as the figures in the narrative are caught in a web of seeing and re-seeing images, an odd interplay of experience and memory. Could Wenders be pointing at another topos with his narrative, one which also figures heavily in Germanys history: the coming to terms with the past? In the film, and in Wenderss execution of it, a medium that the director himself once denounced as purely fascist proves inadequate when confronted with its own kind. As the narrative confirms, Germany and the protagonists history and memory cannot be represented competently by images alone, especially if those images stem from

PAGE 124

115 television technology. In the films metaphorical confrontation the mother dies because her own memories do not conform to the recorded images, Sam and Claire become afflicted with an image-addiction, and the father loses himself in his obsessive research. 52 To be exact, the latter neglects specific ceremonies for mourning and immerses himself in work. The fathers inability to mourn ties in with that aforementioned topos of Germanys post-war history, the lack of Vergangenheitsbewltigung (the inability to come to terms with the past), which eventually causes Farbers total mental collapse. The story of the Farber parents flight from persecution, a minor subplot at best in UtEotW, presents possibilities for a powerful and insightful thesis, eclipsing in comparison the main premise of showing (with images) a world that is saturated and damaged by an abundance of images. This suppressed subplot, literally in the film and symbolically through association with first and second generation German relationships (personified by Henry, the father and Sam, his son in the film) points toward another implication most certainly not intended by Wenders: UtEotW, although painfully constructed as a supernational film, accommodates its most interesting hypothesis in the national specifics contained in a minor storyline. In UtEotW Wenders had the opportunity to use the new technology HDTV to add to a discourse that still plays an important role in Germanys imagination, artistic and otherwise. Had he showcased the technology in a more favorable light, certain attributes of television may have emerged as possible answers to questions he failed to pose as well. Perhaps cinema does not constitute the most appropriate, or at least not the only 52 Ediths death cannot easily be traced to a narrative impetus. She declares that seeing the world again upset her, but we are not told to which images she was specifically objecting. Ostensibly, Wenders wants to communicate that the world was once a better place (one with less images?), but he fails to make his case stick with his own images.

PAGE 125

116 medium for historical discourse. Enzensberger, for example, although he agrees that the new media favor the present over tradition, distribution over possession, and subversion of ownership through non-originality, also points out that these qualities are not synonymous with a loss of history or historical consciousness (Constituents 69). These attributes can also ensure that multiple histories are recorded and able to be distributed at will and through multiple sources. In short, television/video may represent the medium most suited to telling German history precisely because its productive output does not purport to relay permanence, singular truths, and authoritative sources. UtEotW touches on these points but fails to develop them adequately. After UtEotW, in his music videos and the documentary Buena Vista Social Club, it is difficult to discern how Wenders treats digital and HD video differently from film, formally and aesthetically. 53 He does not necessarily try to invent a new language for a new medium like he promises in Notebooks. Moreover, Wenders sees videos possibility to develop its own language as conditioned largely by its limitations (On Film 356). In other words, videos capacity to express itself is limited, from the beginning, to a set of attributes which cannot live up to cinemas greater arsenal of expressive tools. As he declares, High Definition should try to learn from a better source and a better tradition than television [. .] [from] the far more expressive and civilized language of the cinema (358). He accommodates this attitude with his practical applications and simply adapts his filmic techniques to the new technology. Some of the 53 It could be argued that Buena Vista Social Club displays some of the classic tell-tale signs of video usage, such as jerkiness and extreme mobility of the camera. However, these techniques have also become part of the language of the latest trend in the films of Hollywood and are just as easily expressed with traditional 35mm technologies (see chapter 4). Non-digital film equipment has undergone vast improvements over the last decade not only increasing the mobility of the camera due to the reduction in equipment size, but also broadening the scope of effects that can be achieved without any post-production efforts.

PAGE 126

117 comments from his crew attest to this attitude. As one member remarks, [for the U2 video], we used a prototype of the Sony 24P high def camera [. .] It was the first time I shot video. I lit and treated it like film (West). But Wenders is certainly not alone in reacting in this artistic manner. Indeed, it has become a common sentiment of those working in the film industry to assume that HDTVs greatest asset is its close approximation of conventional film stock. The technology itself is changing as well to become more like 35 and 16mm film. The latest digital video camcorders not only feature high resolution but are also capable of recording images at the native film rate of 24 progressive-scanned frames per second. 54 With the latest HD camcorders, filmmakers can realistically emulate different kinds of film stock. The particular stock characteristics are simply uploaded into the camera and subsequently duplicated. Names for digital video technologies such as CineAlta, a Sony product used by Wim Wenders and George Lucas among others, also point symbolically toward the divergence of video and film technologies. Over the years Wenders has displaced his anxieties about video in general (the medium) onto the TV image (the institution) specifically. But he has never fully redeemed traditional video either, not in his comments or his films. Only when video converges with digital technologies can he accept and use it in a respectful manner. Digital video, for Wenders, is closer in its aesthetic and technical make-up to film than TV and therefore recoverable from the oblivion of dilettantism. For Wenders, High Definition, in place of low definition, has the historic opportunity of correcting bad 54 Progressive scanning (in contrast to interlaced scanning), a technology utilized in computer monitors, allows for an entire frame to be displayed before the next arrives making image manipulation easier and reducing noise. Interlaced scanning, an alternating horizontal line display technique employed by television sets, on the other hand, has the disadvantage of being vulnerable to twitter, a type of image interference.

PAGE 127

118 habits of seeing, and to come up with a less terrorist, and a kindlier [sic], more human way of seeing (On Film 357). In other words, that which aligns HDTV closer with the cinema and which distances it from television, can save the new technology from a potentially malign future. Digital advancement in video technology, increasing the latters resolution in projections dramatically, interrupted any promising creative developments which may have followed Wenderss experiments in Notebooks. Video simply becomes a medium with which he tries to imitate film, aesthetically (by not adopting any new techniques), technically (by treating it like film and transferring it back to film), and socially (by showing his video films in the cinema). Wenderss video falls prey to what Jameson calls the very maturity and sophistication of film conceptualities which will necessarily obscure the originality of its cousin [video], whose specific features demand to be reconstructed afresh and empty-handed, without imported and extrapolated categories (Postmodernism 69-70). Once a medium which held hope for many artists to subvert dominant artistic practices and institutions, traditional video is headed for obscurity, soon to be replaced permanently by digital technologies. Although digital video has already affected the film industry immensely in almost every aspect, including pre-production, production, post-production, and distribution and storage, advancement in the technology could very well replace traditional film equipment and practices altogether. It remains to be seen whether this development will prove to widen the pool of creative output or not. It will however, and without a doubt, change the way we see films in the future.

PAGE 128

CHAPTER 4 COMPUTER GAMES AND FILM It is not the plays effect on the audience but its effect on the theatre that is decisive at this moment. Bertolt Brecht, Brecht on Theater The Influence of Digital Technology on Cinema Perhaps the most appropriate way to put it is to remember that when we speak of the cinema today, we speak of cinema after television and after the video game, after the CD-ROM and the theme park. Thomas Elsaesser, Digital Cinema In the years 1936 to1938 began a long-lasting and efficacious relationship between two emergent media: film and computers. At this time German engineer Konrad Zuse developed the first programmable binary computer prototype, Z1, which used 35mm film stock to read its program. 1 Since then, the computer-film connection has blossomed into a close-knit and interrelated nexus; there are very few aspects of film practice which have not been affected in some way, directly or indirectly, by digital media. Computers have changed the way films are recorded, stored, distributed, and watched by viewers at home and on the movie theater screen. Image and sound quality, as well as content of films and filming techniques have been altered by digital technology as well. 1 A reproduction of this computer, which was destroyed by WWII bombs, is exhibited at the Museum fr Verkehr und Technik in Berlin. For a comprehensive overview of Zuses accomplishments and contributions to the development of computers see the Konrad Zuse Archive online at http://www.zib.de/zuse/index.html and the Konrad Zuse Freundeskreis Homepage http://konrad-zuse-freundeskreis.de/ (both in German), as well as the Virginia Tech History of Computing site at http://ei.cs.vt.edu/~history/Zuse.html (in English). 119

PAGE 129

120 Although most film viewers readily acknowledge the influence of computer technology on cinematic practices, the relationship/flow is two-way and the influence of film on the computer industry, in particular the area of desktop development, has been pointed out by several critics. Lev Manovich describes this connection convincingly in his book The Language of New Media. He argues: Cinema, the major cultural form of the twentieth century, has found a new life as the toolbox of a computer user. Cinematic means of perception, of connecting space and time, of representing human memory, thinking, and emotions become a way of work and a way of life for millions in the computer age. Cinema's aesthetic strategies have become basic organizational principles of computer software. The window in a fictional world of a cinematic narrative has become a window in a datascape. In short, what was cinema has become human-computer interface. (86) The influence of films on computer/videogames 2 a specific type of digital technologyis perhaps even more conspicuous. 3 Films have obviously had a great impact on the look and feel of most videogames. This visually apparent similarity is augmented by the two medias related formal attributes and technological make-up. For one, videogames, unlike many of their non-digital cousins, usually do not require the experience of participating in a group as an integral part of letting a player have fun (except for those that use the Internet as an extension and an interface with other 2 The terms videogame and computer game are used interchangeably in this essay. Conventionally, the former refers to arcade game systems or console systems displayed on a TV monitor, and the latter indicates that the game can be played on a computer and is displayed on a monitor. 3 There also exists a close relationship between desktop computers and videogames. Not only can both media trace their inceptions to the early 1970s, they are intimately linked in their technological development as well. Arcade games such as Computer Space (1971) and the mail-order Altair personal computers (1974) are generally acknowledged to be the first games and desktops, respectively, to be available to a general public. Desktop computers and videogames experienced a similar chronological development in their abilities to accommodate graphical sophistication, a very important factor in the genealogy of computer/videogame development. Indeed, some critics contend that videogames, which rely extensively on computer-based technology, and computer games have been one of the motivating factors for the improvement of desktop computer technology (Brante 322).

PAGE 130

121 players). 4 This is also the case with films which turn the consumption of visual narratives into a predominantly private experience via the dark and quiet atmosphere of the theater. As Bolter and Grusin point out, games based on interactive narrative (such as Tomb Raider) favor a single user with the time and the solitude to solve puzzles and make choices. These more thoughtful games remediate film rather than video (94). This remark also exposes videogames as closer aligned with film than trying to imitate video, and by extension television. Timothy Corrigan remarks: When any movie is watched as a television show, that is, the domestic setting of the experience may create a kind of immediacy and complicity between the television image and the viewer, but that imaginistic immediacy is very significantly redefined across the fragmentation that is either built into the television text (such as commercial interruptions and the cuttings or reductions of the image) or simply intrude upon and invade it as part of the distractions of a domestic environment (conversations or the ringing of a phone). The television spectator, according to John Ellis, glances rather than gazes at the screen; attention is sporadic rather than sustained. (24) In the case of most computer and videogames, players must pay uninterrupted attention to the game to triumph in battles, solve puzzles, remain in control of avatars and other virtual stand-ins, and keep up with challenges incorporated into the games structure and goals. Of course, continuous focus and quick reactions are especially important in real-time games such as flying or racing simulators. Also, whether computer and videogames are displayed on a monitor, a TV, or a coin-op display, they use, as does film, a screen to interface with the participant/viewer. In films and computer/videogames there is often a simulation of an other on screen while the viewer/participant identifies with the camera point of view, either as external 4 A very early convergence of computer and conventional gaming represents the chess game, where the computer simulates the actions of an opponent. Again, it was Konrad Zuse who first adapted this game to a binary computing machine. In 1945, he developed a computer driven chess game utilizing a forerunner of todays programming languages called Plankalkl which he had developed earlier.

PAGE 131

122 witness or in place of one of the characters in the interactive narrative. The purpose of this identification, in the case of both media, is most often to offer an immersive experience which facilitates the escape from everyday reality. The difference between films and videogames for achieving this goal lies in the degree of participation or intervention in the story line and story environment which is imparted on the viewer/participant. 5 There also exists much common ground between the two media concerning stylistic devices, as can be seen in the FMVscenes (full-motion-video or cut-scenes), the mimicking of camera angles, point-of-view shots, visual and sound effects, and strategic adoption of non-diegetic music and diegetic sound effects. 6 While videogames have undeniably and obviously been influenced aesthetically by the medium of film, the opposite, film style being influenced by videogames, is more difficult to discern. An excellent example of the potential for these games to affect film aesthetics is Run Lola Run (1998). The film serves as an exemplary model of intra-filmic remediation of an extra-filmic new media, the computer/videogame, through artistic intervention and the employment of a formal rupture. 7 5 It is tempting to compare the interactivity available in a videogame with the intervention possibilities offered by VCR and TV remote control technologies. However, neither television programs nor videos are made to be viewed in any other way than continuously and at prescribed times, respectively. Viewer interactivity does not have any significant influence upon original meaning, at least not compared to the influence interactivity has on videogame narratives. Television, which constantly battles the channel-flipping impulse of viewers, is a case in point. Programs and commercials are specifically designed to hold attention and keep the audience from moving on. 6 FMV-scenes are common features found in newer games due to the greater storage capacity of game media. They are commonly used to advance the story of the game, similar to the function of recitative in opera. They are also presented as a reward and respite to players finishing a particular task or level in a game and serve as establishing scenes to introduce the player to the games plot and general objective. In Run Lola Run, the initial sequence, when Manni narrates the preceding events leading to his predicament, acts and feels very much like a game cut-scene. 7 I am employing the term remediation in the sense set forth by Bolter and Grusin in Remediation. The authors define it as the formal logic by which new media refashions prior media forms (273).

PAGE 132

123 Run Lara Run Style Eclipses Content: Reinventing Popular Appeal If the bad news is that old stereotypes are still in full swing, the good news is that hip style (handheld camera, fast editing, nonlinear narratives) and hip humor (parody, satire, self-awareness) make them go down easier. Ruby Rich, The Nation When Tim Tykwers film Run Lola Run premiered in Germany, where many domestic films cannot compete with the heavy line-up of Hollywood Blockbusters, 8 it became one of the twenty most successful films of 1998, the second most watched of all the German films that year (Joseph Vilsmaiers Comedian Harmonist ranked first) (Schroeder). It also faired well in the United States, winning the Sundance Audience Award and collecting praise from critics as diverse as Janet Maslin of The New York Times and Peter Travers of Rolling Stone. It grossed millions of dollars in 1999 on the American market alone and continued drawing in large audiences throughout the following year. However, Run Lola Runs popularity is, of course, relative in the no-subtitles America (Rich 34), where it only reached number 150 of the most successful films for 1999 (Richter). Nevertheless, in comparison to other foreign-language entries, with the exception of La vita bella, it performed extraordinarily well. What is particularly remarkable about Run Lola Run is that, although wide-ranging in its appeal, its filmic structure does not conform to conventional strategies in popular film traditions. In his 1972 essay Godard and Counter Cinema: Vent dEst, Peter Wollen discusses Godards formation of a counter-cinemaan apparatus pitted against orthodox Hollywood pictures. Wollen outlines the formulaic practices and conformative trends 8 In 1998, the percentage of market share for German films in the domestic market was only 8 percent (of DM 692 Million). American imports, in contrast, made up for 85 percent of the total market (Wolken).

PAGE 133

124 found in most popular films and outlines the following characteristics, or seven deadly sins, which illustrate the constituents of dominant cinema: a straight-forward narrative flow, audience identification with characters, transparency (immediacy) that hides filmic construction, a homogeneous diegetic world, conflict resolution and closure, pleasure through escape from reality, and a fictional story (Wollen 499-506). According to Wollen, popular cinema employs these conventions in order to appeal to a wide range of spectators and to satisfy audience expectations as much as possible. 9 While Run Lola Run is not a pure counter-cinema film, in keeping with Wollens rigid guidelines, since it incorporates pleasure and fiction into its text, it certainly subverts the remaining categories systematically. Although produced nearly thirty years after Wollens essay on Godards Vent dEst, Run Lola Run still manages to undermine conventional cinematic practices in a manner reminiscent of the Swiss/French director. 10 For though Godard had a more overtly ideological mission, what the two filmmakers share is their willingness to experiment with style. In the broader context of contemporary cinema it is becoming increasingly apparent that the dominant practices employed in the early seventies no longer apply as comprehensively to popular films as they once did. Innovations that were considered avant-garde in the past are now used as surprise techniques (devoid of political intention) to keep the media-savvy mainstream audience from getting bored. 9 American media critic Dwight MacDonald argues that the industry tries to fulfill audience expectations because viewers find it easier to consume a story that includes predictability (cited in Hollows Mass Culture4-25). 10 Interestingly, Stuart Klawans, in his review of Run Lola Run, briefly compares Tykwers film to Godards feature film Breathless (1961). Klawans points out that Run Lola Run follows to some degree in the footsteps of the latter which is the fore-runner of on-the-run films that trafficked in the coolness of movies, the dangers of True Love and the neer-do-well winsomeness of a homely-handsome criminal. Of course Klawans is also quick to point out that Tykwers film cannot in substance come close to Godards, only in coolness. Besides coolness, Tykwers film resurrects Brechtian principles of epic style, which were also important for Jean-Luc Godards filmmaking (see chapter 2).

PAGE 134

125 There are plenty of examples within recent popular films that have violated one or more points in Wollens formula, e.g. Pulp Fiction (1994), Twelve Monkeys (1995), Out of Sight (1998), The Blair Witch Project (1999), American Beauty (1999), Magnolia (1999), and Memento (2001), to name but a few. In comparison to Tykwers film, however, their experimentation with film convention is limited. Surprisingly, there are many more films that still adhere to Wollens formula even so many years after the texts inception. Run Lola Runs attempt at reworking conventions while still retaining popular appeal has succeeded in opening up dominant cinema to even further experiments. The films narrative incorporates digressions, repetitions, and disjunctures while also limiting the opportunity for viewers to identify with the films main characters. In fact, their personality traits are not admirable, and, like the characters of Godards Breathless, they are social misfits with a leaning toward unlawfulness. Reinforcing the spectators distance from the protagonists, the film never tries to hide its artificial construction. On the contrary, it revels in its self-reflexive hypermediacy. 11 Run Lola Run confronts its audience with multiple visual media: video, 35mm film stock, cel-animation, and still photography and bombards it with fast cuts and unnatural camera angles. Of course, the three segments that tell the same tale with slight changes and different endings are far removed from normative diegetic exposition and frustrate the viewers desire for closure. 12 Yet, Tykwers film was very successful, even with audiences accustomed to dominant cinematic fare, precisely because it was not 11 The term hypermediacy here refers to Bolter and Grusins use of the term. They define it as style of visual representation whose goal is to remind the viewer of the medium (272). 12 Although the final episode is the one with the happy ending, it includes no diegetic clues that lend it superiority over the other segments.

PAGE 135

126 referencing classical film conventions. Rather, I contend, it appealed to viewers through another, less obvious, though also immensely popular medium: the videogame, a form Tykwer uses as a stylistic template to structure Run Lola Run. Computer/videogames have surpassed all other game media in both popularity and economic success. Not surprisingly, then, Run Lola Run makes abundant allusions to this digital medium as well as to conventional games. However, I intend to show that Run Lola Runs primary goal is not to capitalize on the popular appeal of videogames through imitation. Rather, the film reflects critically upon its own medium and attempts to relax the narrative and visual conventions of dominant cinema practices by adopting conventions used in videogames. Run Lola Run acknowledges, even highlights, the limits of its cinematic apparatus, but also demonstrates that its restrictive and static nature can be subverted and its conventions suppressed. Tykwer uses an ostensibly simple concept to accomplish this task: The film is fashioned around the theme of games; however, the viewer is a spectator in the unfolding of the play, rather than an active participant. Apart from Run Lola Runs latent manifestation of videogame aesthetics, the film includes plenty of overt references to games in general. Games and films have many overlapping characteristics and are therefore media which are easily reconciled in Tykwers film. As McLuhan reminds us, games are popular art forms with strict conventions, need rules, conventions, and spectators, and we consent to being a part of a dynamic mechanism in an artificially contrived situation (237-240). The opening quote After the game is before the game, attributed to Sepp Herberger, one of Germanys most famous soccer coaches, is immediately followed by another announcement: The ball is round. The game lasts 90 minutes. Everything else is theory,

PAGE 136

127 spoken by one of the films secondary characters, the bank security guard. Since Run Lola Runs approximate running length is also close to ninety minutes (81 minutes, to be exact), this declaration can be extended to apply to the film as a game, as well as to a soccer match. These scenes are presented within the first few minutes of the film and establish a leitmotif for everything that ensues. To expand the game allusion beyond the sports references and to arrive at a more general definition, Run Lola Runs diegesis also includes the game of dominoes and an animated Roulette croupier announcing, Rien ne vas plus, signaling that the game (film) has begun for the main character. In response, Lola runs to save the day and wins her game. She eventually succeeds, of course, when this trope comes full circle and she triumphs against incredible odds in a game of Roulette at a casino. Finally, embedded in the overall narrative structure of the film lie the rules according to which all players/characters must adhere. When Lola breaks the law, Manni dies; when Manni breaks the law, Lola dies. When both pursue the DM 100,000 more or less legitimately, they live happily ever after. Law and order functions as a metaphor for rules, and since rules are essential elements of games, they cannot be broken to win. Because of technical limitations, Run Lola Run must do without traditional game features such as competition (player vs. player and/or game), interactivity (input leading to response), and winning/losing in the traditional sense. Yet, it still retains a playful overall ambience. Therefore, it seems fitting that the film uses the references to soccer, a spectator game par excellence, and especially popular in Europe, to frame the action and prepare the audience for an unconventional visual experience. Viewers are passive as the traditional film medium demands, but at the same time engaged in the experiencing of the

PAGE 137

128 kinetic extravaganza styled like an interactive videogame. Tom Tykwer explains the films effect fittingly when he remarks, Run Lola Run is supposed to exert thrill, it should have the effect of a roller coaster on the viewers who will be made to quake and quiver (Tykwer). 13 When comparing the medium film to a roller coaster, he also alludes to the fact that physical passivity does not necessarily equal boredom. This comment seeks to remind audiences that, although new medias potential for interactivity is often touted as something that sets it apart, provides an improvement, over older representational media, a certain kind of passivity (an engaging passivity?) can have its appeal as well. 14 In early 1997, one year prior to Run Lola Runs domestic release, the Eidos Interactive videogame, Tomb Raider, hit the worlds gaming market, becoming an instant market success. 15 So much so that it spawned several, equally, or even more popular, sequels each one improving upon its predecessor. The Tomb Raider sequels lure players with enhanced graphics, expanded interactive attributes, new engaging scenarios, and additional creative opponents for the games star, Lara Croft, to encounter. Lara is now as famous as any film star, with innumerable fan clubs and Internet sites as well as a monthly German magazine devoted to all aspects of her non-being. She can be seen worldwide in computer-generated TV and magazine ads peddling products such as Nike 13 In the original: Lola rennt soll mitreien, eine Achterbahn fr die Zuschauer sein, die durchgeschttelt werden. 14 Smith argues that seeing film and TV as passive media devalues their appeal in the realm of popular entertainment compared to interactive digital media, because action and choice are regarded as valuable cultural forms and passive and controlled enjoyment therefore elicits pleasure only in accompaniment of guilt (10-12). 15 Some estimates claim that the Tomb Raider games, which can be played on console as well as computer systems, have taken in revenues of more than 500 million Dollars in the U.S. alone.

PAGE 138

129 and Pepsi, and the Lucozade energy drink, which has been renamed in her honor to Larazade. 16 Finally, in the summer of 2001, her flesh-and-blood counterpart, Angelina Jolie, portrayed her on cinema screens all over the U.S. in the film Lara Croft: Tomb Raider. In Germany, Lara enjoys tremendous success not only as a game character, but also as a poster child for commercial products. She has appeared on magazine covers and newspapers such as Die Welt, Stern, Focus, and in television commercials for the magazine Brigitte. The popular German rock band Die rzte profited from her audience appeal when they cast her in the music video for their song Mnner sind Schweine (men are pigs). 17 That Lara exists only as a computer-generated image makes her enormous success all the more problematic. 18 Films and Games: A Winning Combination? The hybrid of the meeting of two media is a moment of truth and revelation from which new form is born. For the parallel between two media holds us on the frontiers between forms that snap us out of the Narcissus-narcosis. The moment of the meeting of media is a moment of freedom and release from the ordinary trance and numbness imposed by them on our senses. Marshall McLuhan, Understanding Media 16 Recently, Lolas character experienced more commercial acknowledgement, not only in Germany, but also in the US. Visa ran an advertisement of a woman running through a city, very much in Lolas style, to catch her sons school bus and bring him lunch. Although the Run Lola Run allusion is not explicit, the reference to Lola is clear to anyone who has seen the film. 17 The video became enormously popular receiving plenty of airtime on the European MTV and other music channels and propelling the songs record sales to reach number one on the German charts (Lara Croft 78). 18 For a more detailed description of how cinemas star system has been adapted by the digital world and a discussion of Laras position in this system see Mary Fanagans essay Mobile Identities, Digital Stars, and Post-Cinematic Selves. However, in this essay Flanagan describes all female digital celebrities as obnoxiously sexualized female stars (14), which is surely an exaggeration. There are plenty of virtual women which defy this stereotype. Ms. PACMAN represents one of the more obvious exceptions to Flanagans depiction. She is right to point out, on the other hand, that many hyper-sexualized female characters exist in the digital arena and discusses two convincing cases: Ultravixen and Kiss Dolls. These two types make Laras sex appeal pale in comparison; they are virtually pornographic sex toys.

PAGE 139

130 It is no secret that video and computer games are becoming a force in entertainment with which few other media are able to compete. Even films, once considered the premier choice of entertainment and bringing billions of dollars each year to the United States economy, recently gave way to the lucrative gaming industry: In 2000, videogame software and hardware sales reached $8.9 billion versus $7.3 billion for movie box-office receipts (Wall Street Journal cited in Poole 7). However, for the most part, films and computer games do not appear to take part in any competitive scrambles resulting from or spawning such comparisons. In fact, both media often exist symbiotically, promoting and remediating each other and each others stars and themes through cross-media and trans-media campaigns, financing each others endeavors (e.g. Sega and Cronenbergs eXistenZ), and adapting each others stories and characters to film and game screen. As Bolter and Grusin argue, The goal [of remediation] is not to replace the earlier forms, to which the company may own rights, but rather to spread the content over as many markets as possible (68). As already mentioned, computer games openly emulate the older medium of film. According to Bolter and Grusin these games do the only thing, any new technology can do: define itself in relationship to earlier technologies of representation (28). This imitative style is immediately apparent in the FMV-scenes, but also includes use of camera angles, point-of-view shots, visual effects, use of sound, and inclusion of actors. On the first level of Tomb Raider, for example, when Lara enters the caves, she looks up at an opening to the left, ostensibly indicating the direction in which the player is to go. The player her/himself never initiated this look. 19 It is programmed to occur as 19 In the game, Laras point-of-view can be deliberately controlled with a keyboard or game pad function and the player can have a look around the 3-D environment.

PAGE 140

131 Lara reaches a certain point in the cave corridor. While this directed and manipulated point-of-view is clearly a nod to film (as well as TV and video), it is also an ironic device, because strategically the player would do better to ignore this left passage and continue straight ahead to a dead-end room with tasks to accomplish first. However, not only do films affect games, but the opposite is also true: films remediate computer technology relying on CGI (computer-generated imaging) and action sequences that extend the boundaries set by conventional techniques which employ staging, lighting, and non-digital special effects. 20 Most of the time when critics discuss how computer games have influenced film techniques and aesthetics, the discussion remains confined to the impact that computer-generated special effects have made, and arguments center predominantly on post-production concerns. This is not surprising since it is rare to encounter a film that consciously fashions itself according to computer game aesthetics: that is, using narrative practices, spatial and temporal devices, atmosphere and rhythm, unique or at least ostensibly tailored to a computer game world. Upon closer inspection, however, some slight changes that can be traced to computer technology as well as games are slowly transforming the structure of popular films. This is precisely where Tom Tykwer takes his cue and, with Run Lola Run, offers a film which tries to accomplish a double task: openly emulate computer game aesthetics while still retaining an overall filmic structure, both strategies translating into what has become a highly entertaining and popular film. 21 20 There are also plenty of films using gaming as a topic for their narrative, for example Tron (1982), WarGames (1983), The Last Starfighter (1984) the aforementioned Cronenberg film eXistenZ (1999), etc. or adapting a game to the screen, for example Mortal Kombat (1995), Wing Commander (1999), Final Fantasy: The Spirits Within (2001), and not to forget Lara Croft: Tomb Raider (2001). 21 The term popular, conventionally refers to that which belongs to or is addressed at the common people, and is seen in opposition to that which belongs to the elite. It can also, however, classify

PAGE 141

132 However, instead of playing to the passive audience that is generally associated with popular entertainment forms, both texts engage the viewer, in medium-specific ways, in the production of meaning. In Tomb Raider the player physically interacts with the narrative environment, and in Run Lola Run the viewer is challenged through the stylistic choices, e.g. the rapid editing, presented in the film. Lets walk through Run Lola Run, in the double sense of a game walk-through and a slowing down of the films motifs, to demonstrate the techniques that lend the film such unique but, simultaneously, popular entertainment value. 22 Conquering Space through Speed The true problem with virtual reality is that orientation is no longer possible. We have lost our points of reference to orient ourselves. The de-realized man is a disoriented man. Paul Virilio, Interview Run Lola Runs similarities to the Eidos Interactive computer/videogame Tomb Raider are not just confined to superficial characteristics of the protagonists in both, Lola something which many people find agreeable with their tastes, something that does well commercially. The two definitions are not always synonymous. For example, some popular style (low brow or anti-elite) Hollywood films are un-popular at the box-office. They do not draw the large audiences which they were trying to attract (Hollows and Jancovich 1-2). Run Lola Run and Tomb Raider have managed to claim both of these definitions for themselves. For an unconventional definition of popular, one strongly linked to process rather than a state of being, and therefore closely related to my reading of Run Lola Run, one must look back further into media history to Bertolt Brechts explication of the term. He defines it as a state that the masses adopt as a reaction to material that is understandable and meaningful to them, but that can also represents the point-of-view of progressive members of society (108). Popular is a state that is not static but also part of the development of taste itself. Besides being popular there is such a thing as becoming popular (112). Additionally, although the designations of popular and elite remain as categories, that which is classified as one or the other is historically and culturally determined (Hollows and Jancovich 3). Run Lola Run may use avant-garde, Godard-like or even Brechtian techniques in its make-up, but it does so several decades later when video clips and advertising techniques have already changed the cultural and historical backdrop for these techniques. 22 A computer game walk-through refers to a detailed description of a games topography and interactive setting and the trajectory of the player through both. Someone writes out, in detail, everything that a player should do and the specific sequence in which all tasks should be done. A player can follow these instructions in order to quickly finish a game and avoid all the obstacles that the programmer has added to make the game more challenging.

PAGE 142

133 and Lara, respectively. Apart from the obvious, but maybe coincidental, name resemblance, the action attire, and the quest for fortune that both women share, they are also similar in other, less noticeable ways. Lolas fantastic control over her environment, things and people, while traversing a space full of obstaclesas well as her seemingly superhuman powers to change the fate of others and her ownare key elements of Run Lola Runs narrative flow. These characteristics directly correspondent to Laras capabilities in Tomb Raider. Most importantly, it is both womens incessant drive to reach their destination that brings them together. The viewers identification with both characters is less embedded in an emotional response, and instead closer to a kinetic one. After watching Run Lola Run one can almost physically feel the exhaustion that the main character emanates. Tykwer uses Lolas movements, intensified by the rhythmic non-diegetic soundtrack, and shifts the cinematic experience out if its visual/auditory mode to produce a haptic response in the viewer. In Tomb Raider, running is Laras default propelling action, as is Lolas in the film. In order to make Lara walk instead of run, the player must press a special keyboard or game pad combination. It is this use of speed and space to which I now turn in order to examine how both media, game and film, utilize this combination in a very specific but also similar way. The navigation and mastery of virtual environments, for example the artificial, dense, and heavily accessorized space created for Tomb Raider and in Run Lola Run, the use of images from Berlin, German urban space par excellence, can be loosely linked to the experience of entering and interacting with real urban spaces. Exploring the simulated places staged in a computer game is initially likely to take the shape of an aimless stroll, apprehensive of what one might find and disoriented by the unfamiliar

PAGE 143

134 space (one that does not always adhere to realistic conventions) or navigational controls (not an intuitive physical walking, after all). Such wandering is therefore not unlike the Dadaist excursions through the urban landscape of Paris in the 1920s. Indeed, new media critics such as Florian Rtzer, Lev Manovich, and others, have linked navigating virtual spaces to flnerie. 23 However, rather than trying to come to terms with the alienating speed of modern life, the postmodern landscapes of computer games are mastered/achieved by utilizing this fast pace in order to explore the game world, perform the various required tasks, and advance to the next experience. Speed is no longer something with which we have to come to terms, but rather something that has become an instrumental part of everyday life. Constituents of communication, manufacturing, travel, and technology are moving at an incredible speed. Virilios disoriented man (see epigraph) is adjusting quickly to this new situation; her or his points of reference have simply changed. 24 Rather than the passive, goalless Dadaist flnerie discoveries, the experience of the computer game is an excursion that invites interaction rather than observation. It is closer aligned with the Situationists drive, a playful interaction with space that calls for contact and intervention, albeit the ultimately teleological drive has been voided of any of the Situationists political dimension. The drive, what the Situationists call a technique of transient passage through varied ambiances (Andreotti 69), makes it possible to apprehend the experience of [. .] space not as spectator but as actor (Hollevoet 45). 23 Manovich expands on the link of navigable virtual space and its flnerie counterpart to some extent in his The Language of New Media (268-74). Florian Rtzer also uses the Baudelaire/Benjamin reference in Digitale Weltentwrfe. 24 Speed is also a particularly important element in modern filmic entertainment and is historically linked to the cinematic apparatus. As Edgar Reitz put it: Speed is the mother of cinema (64).

PAGE 144

135 Similarly, a computer game makes it possible to grasp that which we commonly call virtual space, physically (through the joy stick or other input device) and cognitively through manipulating its constructed environment. That, as Guy Debord observed, written descriptions can be no more than passwords to this great game (26) is as much true of the videogame as it is for the drive; it must be experienced and navigated first-hand not second-hand. In Tomb Raider, as well as many other games in its genre, there exists no topographical representation of the game space which one is supposed to traverse. On the contrary, a representational aid such as this would greatly reduce the pleasure of exploring and diminish the degree of difficulty associated with certain areas. 25 Similarly to a drive where one or more persons [. .] let themselves be drawn by the attractions of the terrain and the encounters they find there (Debord 22), the sites that exist in adventure/exploration type games such as Tomb Raider are not necessarily thought of as a mapable area for the player; they are conceptualized as, for example, the room with the vicious bear, or the cave with the movable wall. In other words, they are tied closely to the interactive experience that awaits the player there, to the extent that often the game retains sinister signs, such as carcasses, of a players earlier interaction with a particular site. 26 Although the commonly encountered architectural terminology (which I am employing here as well) tempts us to connect the virtual with the physical, it is really 25 There are other computer games, particularly those that are part of the role-playing genre, which provide maps as an integral part of the games logic and structure. 26 Although it must be mentioned that most games use official designations for different worlds or levels of the game. But this is usually tied to marketing purposes, atmosphere enhancement, or the designation of a location that the player has reached in a particular game and can save for future games.

PAGE 145

136 only movement that defines the computer game space. 27 If the player chooses not to encounter a certain room, it simply does not exist for her/his game (except for maybe in its absence, legible as a reduced score or a failed objective). This is a characteristic that these types of computer games have in common with popular films. In the latter, as well, only space that is filmed exists on screen for the observer, space outside the frame, especially the physical realm of the viewer is seldom acknowledged since it would compromise the illusion of the films autonomous reality as well as interrupt, to some extent, the act of losing oneself in the films staged world. Run Lola Run does not use common diegetic tools, such as character development devices, to guide and engage its audience, rather the story develops and is driven by the navigation of space, a common diegetic tool for computer games as well. 28 In Run Lola Run, the urban setting of Berlin, a place commonly loaded with ideological meaning for other German films, 29 has become a virtual setting in Tykwers film; a city that never had a Reichstag, a Wall, or a Cold War evil twin. 30 Although an aerial view of the supposed film location is presented to the viewer early on in the film, most of the space revealed in the film frame reflects only those paths and locations that 27 Some examples would be rooms, levels, build, etc. 28 Manovich goes even further and declares that the idea of navigable space lies at the very origins of computer era. He is referring to the term Cybernetics, coined by Norbert Wiener, which is derived from the Greek kybernetikos and is commonly translated as good at steering (251). 29 Some notable examples are Berlin, Symphony of a Great City (1927), The Marriage of Maria Braun (1979), Wings of Desire (1987), November Days (1992), Life Is All You Get (1997) (Tykwer wrote this screenplay), and Heroes Like Us (1999), Berlin Is in Germany (2001). 30 Although Lola mentions that there is a Grunewaldstrasse in the East, she only recounts this potentially geo-political detail as an explanation for her late arrival.

PAGE 146

137 Lola uses to get the DM 100 000 and meet up with Manni, her boyfriend. 31 There are some flashbacks that violate this principle, but they are presented in stark contrast to the general flow of the film as black & white film stock. Similarly, the episodic flash-forwards that preview the fate of the secondary characters after interacting with Lola are also set-off distinctly from the fast-flowing diegesis as photographic still images. Finally, all scenes that do not involve either Lola or Manni are filmed in video rather than 35 mm in order to achieve a kind of synthetic, artificial world (Tykwer). Tykwer is not interested in complicating his tale through weighing down a specific urban landscape with meaning, instead, his approach allows meaning only where Lola interacts. Tykwers aesthetic use of landscape corresponds to the techniques that computer games utilize to deal with their virtual environments. Steven Poole observes in Trigger Happy that the space/character relationship is precisely what informs the basis for computer game architecture (212). The environment of Tomb Raider is built to accommodate Lara: the height of ledges is designed according to Laras ability to climb and jump; the length of underwater passages is adjusted to her ability to hold her breath; and so on. The topography of a videogame adheres to set rules in a way that a film set does as well; virtual and filmic space are both prescribed and distinctively meaningful. All items and locations in a computer game have a function even if this function is limited to being a device to deceive or create atmosphere. Everything important looks staged, so as to attract attention and to prompt the player to interact. 31 This is also similar to the practices employed in the drive where the cartographic or aerial depiction served as the initial representation of the environment which was to be studied, but later was rendered inadequate because the indexical representation lacked the complexity and richness that only physical interaction can convey.

PAGE 147

138 Correspondingly, in Run Lola Run, the mise-en-scne gives the impression that it is arranged in this videogame-like fashion in order to provide Lola and Manni with an interactive environment. The film even goes so far as to disregard the laws of physics when the situation demands it, as in the scene in which Lola and Manni converse through a store window as if it were not really there. Additionally, the secondary characters featured in the film interact with Lola and Manni in two ways, they either hinder or advance them in their quest, as in the case of the nun. However, like the store window, when something or someone would detract or be utterly useless, such as traffic, it simply vanishes. This is especially evident in the final scene in which Lola looks for Manni, who is getting out of a car in the background. She stands superimposed on a motionless background with neither moving cars nor bustling pedestrians that would render this city space real. The space through which Lola navigates seems to be responding to her every move; it creates the illusion of existing solely for her passage. If she interacts with this space in slightly different ways, the story takes a different course. In a Votivkino interview, Tykwer himself alludes to this when he mentions that Lolas interaction with Berlin is based on the Pippi Longstocking motto I shape the world to be the way I want it to be 32 Lara and Lola traverse through their constructed diegetic spaces at a frantic paceboth running to convey a certain rhythm, a significant mood and stylistic device employed in both game and film. 33 This incessant attempt to keep player and viewer in a 32 In the original, Tykwer does not mention Pippi by name but quotes the song that accompanies the television series, Ich mach mir die Welt, wie sie mir gefllt. Lolas red mane and superhuman abilities also resemble this Astrid Lindgren literary figure. 33 This is not to say that Tomb Raider never contains slow-paced sections. Indeed, other action games, such as Quake, for example, are much faster in comparison. One must even deliberately reduce Laras speed to complete a task in some instances. Also, the player controls the overall speed, and therefore the games

PAGE 148

139 dynamic relationship with their respective representational medium can be seen as part of a larger trend in recent entertainment and commercial venues. Advertising with its rapid-fire image assaults is a case in point, as are music videos and the manifest tendencies of post-classical Hollywood cinema dating back to the seventies and maturing in the eighties and nineties (Bordwell). 34 Underlying this stylistic employment of speed, through fast cutting, camera-movement, and choice in subject matter, is the need to make visual material, once thought of as fulfilling an audiences desire for passive pleasure, more interactive. In advertising, for example, static images cannot hold the consumers interest for long, so that the adoption of floating words began as a method of motivating viewers to become more involved in deciphering the ad message [. .] (Goldman 29-30). 35 Popular cinema has had to adopt a modified style as well to satisfy this expanding media sensibility of viewers. David Bordwell characterizes this adjustment as a gradual development over the last thirty years, influenced partially by visual techniques used in television and later in music videos, and evident in an increase of shots per film or reduction of shot length and hyperactive camera employment (the camera continually pace can be decelerated or halted completely at any time. This is not unlike the pace set for Run Lola Run where Tykwer also slows down or stops the action at times. However, when moving from one location to another, which is, after all, the main narrative theme, Lara as well as Lola run to get there and therefore set a certain base rhythm for game and film. 34 Timothy Corrigan also communicates a link between successful popular movies and the advertisement industry in terms of filmic content: Contemporary movies [. .] begin to align themselves with advertising not only to abate their costs by advertising other peoples products on the screen but because blockbuster movies can themselves only succeed as an advertisement of a product that, in appealing to everyone, cannot possibly be realized for an audience of individuals (21). 35 In Die Eroberung des Krpers. Vom bermenschen zum berreitzten Menschen, Paul Virilio argues similarly that the passive and immobile lifestyle of the postmodern subject demands increased stimuli from the media as compensation.

PAGE 149

140 moves as it records). 36 In a study using many of the well-received films of recent years, Bordwell has determined that most contemporary popular films are comprised of 2000 to 3000 shots, with an average shot length of no more than 2-3 seconds, which constitutes a significant increase compared to films of the classical Hollywood era. This statistic not only applies to action films where a brisk tempo would satisfy genre expectations, but also includes non-action dramas such as Jerry Maguire (1996). Run Lola Run exaggerates these techniques so that most cuts separate shots lasting barely a second (often less), an editing mode that contributes significantly to the films dynamic style. 37 When shots do last longer, they are tracking shots where the camera is moving at the same speed as the mise-en-scne. These traveling shots appear most notably when the camera follows Lola as she runs to complete her task in only twenty minutes. The sequences shot in video also tend to include longer takes, but keep the viewer actively involved in decoding the images because of the unstable hand-held recording technique. When Lola and Manni slow down their lives and engage in their inter-segment pillow talk, recorded in relatively long takes, the audience feels encouraged to take a break as well. Overall, however, these breaks intensify the films fast pace because they provide a standard for gauging the speed employed in the rest of the film. Although these kinetic techniques can be linked to general developments in advertising and film, Run Lola Run also uses the fast pace to lend it the feel of a game, a race against time. 36 In addition to faster cutting and increasingly mobile camera shots, Bordwell also cites a change in the use of camera lenses and a closer framing of characters engaged in dialogue as developments that are integral attributes found in post-classical Hollywood cinema. 37 Moulin Rouge! (2001) also successfully adapts this editing technique a few years later in many of its scenes to achieve an overall vigorous pace.

PAGE 150

141 The Quest for Narrative Caring nothing for the division between good and bad literature, narrative is international, transhistorical, transcultural: it is simply there, like life itself. Roland Barthes, Image-Music-Text Tykwer abstains from conveying interrelationships of events and continuity, by negating notions of sequence, logic, and causality, elements which make up the basic principles of common diegetic progression. Although each segment in Run Lola Run incorporates the basic laws of cause and effect, the film interrupts its own diegetic flow with alternating divergent media, going from 35mm to video to animation to still photography, as well as using various filmic techniques, such as split-screens, black-and white versus color images, and slow motion shots. 38 These techniques highlight the constructedness of the story and therefore interfere with the viewers immersion into the films reality. Also, the flash-forward fragments that are associated with some of the secondary characters are extra-diegetic elements that interfere with the continuity of the main plot. But most of all, the restarting of the narrative and replaying of many of the scenes with only minor changes sets Tykwers story apart from conventional storytelling. As Manovich points out, narrative cinema has avoided repetitions; like Western fictional forms in general, it put forward a notion of human existence as a linear progression through numerous unique events 39 (315-16). In Run Lola Run, repetition is used as part of the films logic; since the protagonists are not ordinary humans acting in conventional 38 According to Tykwer, juxtaposing these heterogeneous elements represents an experiment with and a comment on the limits of the film medium per se. 39 In the mainstream Hollywood film Groundhog Day (1993), the disdain for repetition even becomes the topic of the films story. The protagonists main objective is to escape from the redundancy of reliving the same day over and over. Repetition is cast as a punishment for the hero who will only avoid it through improving his disposition.

PAGE 151

142 settings, the films structure cannot be ordinary or conventional either. 40 Repetition and non-linear narratives are, of course, also at the heart of digital entertainment. 41 Websites, hypertext stories, interactive CD-ROMs, and videogames are all excellent examples for this. The technical limitations and benefits of the digital medium itself demand a different narrative approach than the older media did. 42 In Hypertext 2.0 George Landow shows how this alternative approach manifests itself in hyperlinked texts. Instead of following a linear expository trajectory, hypertext has the ability to let the writer go off on tangents; it enables writers to consider facts that "resist linearization" (59). This unorthodox structure generates a lack of centrality as well as marginality in the organization of material (89). Also, hypertext promotes a rhetorical structure which appropriates others work into and juxtaposes it with ones own argumentation (170-71). 43 It does not rely on normative styles but favors a dynamic presentation of views (following links transversely). This 40 Although one does not usually think of repetition as part of a conventional Hollywood narrative, there is repetitive use of generic narrative devices in most Hollywood blockbusters. For example, the description psychotic, masked killer goes around slashing the throats of innocent but foolish teenagers, kills them all but one, who, in turn, kills him in a heroic final confrontation could be the plot summary of several horror films. Perhaps Tykwer is using repetition as an element of parody to highlight the generic, formulaic use of repetition in popular films. Of course, in Run Lola Run the repeating segments have the exact opposite effect of those in generic convention; instead of reusing elements from other, similar films, it reuses intrinsic elements. Tykwer may also be referencing certain Avant-Garde films and techniques of the sixties, such as Last Year at Marienbad (1961), or the grid-like paintings by Mondrian, Albers, and Agnes Martin (c.f. Rosalind Krausss discussion of repetition used by the Avant-Garde in The Originality of the Avant-Garde). 41 The element of repetition also comes into play on the level of the film audience. Many viewers saw Run Lola Run several times, most likely because the films structure itself values returning to the story more than once. 42 Narrative is, however, not necessarily an essential part of films. Certain avant-garde traditions of filmmaking, e.g. Maya Deren and Hans Richter, have proven that. However, fiction and non-fiction films aimed at mainstream audiences almost always use a narrative to ensure viewing pleasure. As Thomas Elsaesser has pointed out, even the Lumire brothers infused in their short films a narrative, albeit minimal, with fictional elements (Lumire 52). 43 In Tykwers film such appropriations are common. One of the most obvious examples is Lolas glass-breaking scream, a recycling of Oskar Mazeraths ability in The Tin Drum.

PAGE 152

143 dynamic exposition of perspective is facilitated by the technological make-up of digital media and constitutes Run Lola Run and Tomb Raiders primary vehicle for narration. Apart from juxtapositions, appropriations, and dynamic interplay, both film and videogame construct their narrative through a trajectory that connects actor/player with their interactive space. Although Lola ostensibly relives the basic story three times, each segment is very different from the preceding one. Otherwise, it would be impossible to keep the viewers interest. Instead of altering the plot significantly, however, Tykwer changes the setting; each episode of the film explores a new space, but the narrative still tells the same basic story of Lola getting DM 100,000 for her boyfriend Manni. In the first segment the action takes place in the bank, the second uses a retail store, and the third episode plays in the casino. This change of location prevents the film from inducing boredom in the viewer. It is predominantly the change of scenery rather than the development of narrative or characters that keeps the audience anxious to see more; it is a purely visual seduction. In videogames, where elaborate narratives are difficult to sustain, the variation of environmental conditions is also the primary device for keeping the player interested in the avatars fate. Every level in Tomb Raider, for example, features new surroundings, environmental conditions, and appropriate adversaries (e.g. bears and bats are encountered in caves). Movement for players in computer games is almost always synonymous with interactivity. Interactivity, in turn, is not necessarily synonymous with freedom in narrative production as various critics have pointed out. 44 Elsaesser argues that interactive 44 Both Elsaessers Digital Cinema and Pooles Trigger Happy discuss the limited interactivity phenomenon to some extent. However, neither critic establishes the difference between interactivity based on branching techniques versus games using algorithms to achieve a rich interactive gaming experience. Talin describes the difference between using branching and algorithms in Real Interactivity in Interactive

PAGE 153

144 environments are static in the sense that they have a terminal, unchanging overall construction. A player may create unique trajectories, but s/he may not create completely new paths, rather than beginning to explore a game environment, [s/he] explore[s] its narrative architecture: its paths and its detours, its branching and its multiple choices (Digital Cinema 217). Additionally, interactivity in computer games is a hyper-structured endeavor because if the player does not end up with a certain number of discovered secrets and items, her/his game enjoyment may suffer or even come to a halt. Many games have an environment that must be navigated to some extent in the way that the creators imagined it. Most of the time, only paths that are given can be explored, only items that are programmed to be there can be found, and all entities that one interacts with have previously been added to specific places and situations. The fun lies not in creating a narrative in a literary sense, but in uncovering a story through actions. The interactive element sets games apart from films, because in the cinema viewers consume the narrative in more passive manner, yet not as far as one might think, because of the restrictive nature of a programmed, pre-created narrative that both media share. 45 Nevertheless, interaction of the players with the game can change the flow of narrative immensely. Essentially, no game ever unfolds in the same way twice. The Entertainment. S/he explains that games such as SimCity or Civilization have an almost unlimited number of possible paths and outcomes because the games behavior is defined by algorithms rather than through pathways programmed by a game designer. These games have a weakness, however, in that they do not, as of yet, produce challenging and realistic human-like opponents, but are better suited for creating inanimate environments. Another critic, Greg M. Smith, also explains interactivity as a concept defined by boundaries and parameters. He does not agree with the generally assumed dichotic structure of non-linear story lines (interactive) versus linear story lines (non-interactive) but uses a more fluent system of degrees to set the two media apart (8). Furthermore, he argues, interactivity is limited through the virtual stand-in replacing our physical body. What is perceived as kicking, running, leaping, etc. is, in actuality, only clicking in the physical world (12-13). 45 Elsaesser mentions The Rocky Horror Picture Show (1975) and The Blues Brothers (1980) as examples of films in which narrative action has taken on a secondary role and interactive behavior of viewers has become most important in the viewing experience (Digital Cinema 216).

PAGE 154

145 player gains more experience each time s/he interacts with the game. Experience enables the player to react differently, adjust to dangers and obstacles, and move in more advantageous directions. Run Lola Run alludes to this integral element of game play within the three segments that have slight changes according to how Lola and Manni interact with their environment. Although on the surface level, Tykwer appears to fashion these alternating segments as a fictional treatment of chaos theory, on the level of style these episodes represent an exposition of how player experience (Lola) can alter the outcome of the game (film). A single moment in Tykwers film makes this intention obvious. In the first episode Lola draws a gun on a security guard at the retail store which Manni is robbing. Because Lola does not know how to unsecure the guns safety mechanism, she is instructed by Manni to move a lever near the weapons trigger. However, in the second episode, Lola does not waver when she is in an almost identical situation. Now, she knows how to operate the gun; she has learned from her past experience. Superweib or Superwoman? 46 Ive heard that the female Quake II character is a lot more realistic as far as anatomys concerned, and she still kicks ass. Now thats one girl Im looking forward to playing. Lara, get those melons out of your vest and Ill like you a whole lot better. Cal Jones, interviewed in From Barbie to Mortal Kombat Watching Lara defeat the most formidable adversaries, master amazing obstacles or hearing Lola release one of her superhuman screams can only lead to one conclusion: We are not dealing with ordinary mortals here. Both women are seemingly controlled through 46 The term Superweib is usually used in a derogatory manner to refer to a womans sex appeal. However, translated literally, it can also refer to a woman with superior abilities.

PAGE 155

146 external forces, in Laras case quite literally through the player, and with Lola indirectly because of the viewers desire to see her win; in their respective constructed spaces they appear as avatars, a term appropriated from Sanskrit referring to deities descended to earth in incarnate form. Whether gods or simply superhuman, the role they both play is not one traditionally assigned to women in either films or videogames. Far from applying feminist concepts to the design of Tomb Raiders hero, however, the Core Design team acted upon considerations based on possible copyright infringement instead, when they decided to cast the main character as a female. Although a team member, Toby Gard, claims: Lara was designed to be a tough, self-reliant, intelligent woman. She confounds all the sexist clichs apart from the fact that shes got an unbelievable figure (quoted in Cassell 30-31), he neglects to mention that she was also specifically designed as a female to avert any complaints concerning her characters astonishing similarity to the Indiana Jones character. Jeremy Smith, managing director at Core Design, intervened when, originally, a male was designated to be the lead character by saying: Christ, you cant do thatwell be sued from here to Timbuktu! (quoted in Poole 153). Additionally, aside from Laras inception being founded on legal considerations rather than based on ideological premises, her potential as feminist role model is highly problematized by the players over-the-shoulder viewpoint, a view that is more accommodating to a voyeuristic gaze than an aid for identification, as well as her physical deformities. 47 Tomb Raiders creators developed this particular point-of-view technique specifically for this game. Other environments up until then either used the completely disembodied point-of47 Interestingly, Japanese players wanted to see Lara assume a more cartoon-like, megacephalic, appearance such as the characters that appear in manga (Poole 141). Lara, however, continued her adventures sporting her Western features.

PAGE 156

147 view, seeing the entire character at all times, or the first-person point-of-view, simulating the player and avatar to be the same person (especially popular in the shoot-em-up and flying/driving simulation genre). Being so close to Lara, yet still retaining a distance far enough to allow for a separate identity experience serves a two-fold purpose: it deflects any potentially alienating cross-gender identification issues for male players not willing to be a woman, and allows the player to watch the avatar intimately and simultaneously manipulate the figure omnipotently. The possibility of obtaining absolute control and power of the figure on the screen is certainly an enticing prospect, especially when that figure has superhuman abilities like Lara. After all, the difference between controlling and being a superhero is slight. However, in most cases, self-projection is as close as the ordinary person gets. In the context of comics, Scott Bukatman has termed the female superhero a personification of hypermasculine fantasy and a spectacle of the female body satisfying male fetishism of breasts, thighs, and hair (112) which is certainly a description applicable to the game character Lara Croft. Indeed, the lure of Laras physique has inspired (male) hackers to program several types of patches, which let her appear completely nude in the game. 48 Laras physical appearance aligns her closer to such feminist nightmares as Barbie (with added muscles) than to Indiana Jones, with whom she shares most of her character traits. 49 The developing team at Core Design constructed her according to the 48 This practice, in turn, has been undermined by other hackers, for example Robert Nideffer, a digital artist, who offers patched patches so one can play with a transsexual Lara, a butch version of Lara, and Lara in drag, to name but a few. He calls this a Duchampian reference to the reappropriative Mona Lisa hack in an attempt to introduce strategies of gender play and subversion into a game that is so obviously catering to male players. 49 Recently, Mattel Interactive and Vivendi Universal introduced a videogame, Barbie Explorer (2001), in which Barbie cashes in on her Lara-likeness and appears as an adventurer and explorer of exotic locations and finder of treasures.

PAGE 157

148 Western stereotype of a perfect female with large breasts, a tiny waist, voluptuous lips, and dressed in very scant and tight outfits; she is, after all, a British invention. 50 However, apart from these physical attributes, Laras character fits into a general trend in current representations of females in action environments in which women no longer have to suffer such wimpy powers as invisibility or telekinesis [. .]. They no longer need protection; they are no longer victims or hostages or prizes (112). 51 To see this developing trend as a positive step towards female empowerment, however, is problematic, as Kaveri Sbrahmanyam and Patricia M. Greenfield point out, when they argue that female characters simply mimic their male counterparts in aggressiveness in addition to posing as sex-goddesses; they are far removed from feminist icons. 52 In Laras case, the players voyeuristic gaze further complicates any feminist prospects. Nonetheless, until a few years ago, it was all but expected to turn female game characters into incarnate misogynistic stereotypes in appearance as well as in their function within the game. The latter often translated into females shown as damsels requiring rescue, or rewards for successful completion of the mission (Cassell 7). Tomb Raider is only one of several games on the market today that feature strong, independent, adventurous female protagonists interacting within an action-adventure environment. However, unlike Core Design, many recent game manufacturers have seized the opportunity inspired by 50 Laras look is reminiscent of the Tankgirl character in the British cartoon of the same name. Japanese female game characters, although often adapted to Western taste, can carry with them their own stereotypical attributes. They are often depicted as giggling schoolgirls wearing sailor uniforms (Cassell 8). 51 The Power Puff Girls are a recent example of such female characters targeting a very young audience. These three girls fame and popularity rivaled that of the male Pokemon action figures. 52 However, sex-appeal has not always kept the female superhero from being used as a feminist icon. Gloria Steinem, for example, used her childhood hero Wonder Woman as a figure to promote her efforts in the feminist movement: Wonder Women appeared as the first cover on Ms. Magazine in 1972 (Searleman).

PAGE 158

149 Lara Crofts success to make their product more appealing to female gamers. The games Oni (Konoko), Carrier (Jessifer Manning), and Resident Evil (Claire Redfield), to name only a few, all feature strong female characters with whom women gamers can identify more easily and who are not solely created for mens gaming pleasure. Although Lara and Lola share certain character traits and function similarly within their constructed spaces, Lola procures her popular appeal from much subtler sources than Lara. In Run Lola Run, Tykwer proves that a powerful female character can attract attention beyond superficial appearances and without featuring exaggerated body parts. His film and Lolas character exert a unique erotic appeal that develops out of the overall filmic atmosphere rather than any specific look, character trait, or camera angle. Ingeborg Majer O'Sickey has successfully shown that the film Run Lola Run includes an abundance of sexual innuendos generated through its rhythmic soundtrack, the bedroom scenes featuring the two main protagonists, and an overall wait for me theme. Lola, however, in her role as the heroine does not resemble Barbie on steroids; she is a real looking person, adorned not with outrageous breasts but with an outrageous hair color. 53 Her appeal depends much more on her actions, her supernatural abilities, and on her influence over people and things that surround her. 54 The females in Tomb Raider and Run Lola Run are both superheroines on the screen, but unlike Laras inability to move in the absence of the players consent, Lola runs and acts without much concern for anyone but herself and her predicament. She acts as player and game avatar at once. 53 Interestingly, in the segments in bed, Lolas hair is blond as if to signify that she has stepped out of the game for a minute to take stock of the situation. 54 She joins the ranks of other important female protagonists featured in many of the most successful films of recent German cinema. Doris Drries Fanny Fink from Nobody Loves Me (1995), many of the women characters in Maybe, Maybe Not (1996), the band members featured in Bandits (1997), etc., are all examples for how audiences respond favorably to females in lead roles.

PAGE 159

150 In addition to Lolas ambivalence concerning her activity/passivity in Run Lola Run, she also lacks gender specificity. She is neither particularly feminine nor does she appear in a setting that stresses a stereotypically female environment, e.g. a domestic surroundings. Even when her bra straps become visible, this is not an erotically charged image but clearly a result of her hyper-kinetic movements. Instead of flaunting her sexuality or highlighting her femininity, Lolas role is more or less interchangeable with Mannis. In fact, it is Manni who shows his vulnerability and helplessness, generally traits attributed to the female characters, when he is forced to wait for Lola to help him out of his troubles. Even in the bedroom scenes, a place where masculinity is often flaunted, Manny appears weak and lacks self-confidence. Although Lola poses the clich question Do you love me? in the first pillow talk segment, Manni concludes the interchange by asking her apprehensively whether she wants to leave him. In the second interlude he worries about what she might do in the case of his death. She replies that she would not let him die, an answer which Manni ignores. Of course, the audience soon finds out that Lola keeps her word and wont let him die; she will simply find another way. Had the roles been reversed and had Lola found herself needing DM 100,000 while Manni tried to save her life, the storys integrity would not have suffered in the least. This type of disregard for gender stereotypes, while retaining the main characters popular appeal, is certainly a positive element in Tykwers film, one that could also translate well into a gaming environment, and has in some cases. Lola is the kind of action heroine that could handle herself well in any interactive environment, including the realm of a tomb raider.

PAGE 160

151 Conclusion: Popular Cinema and Reflections on Originality [O]riginalty is a working assumption that itself emerges from a ground of repetition and recurrence. Rosalind Kraus, The Originality of the Avant-Garde In the same way that Run Lola Runs female protagonist possesses universal attributes so does the film as a whole. It reaches out to a transnational, heterogeneous audience by employing internationally recognizable style and content. 55 Tykwer nevertheless successfully avoids the potential pitfalls of blockbusters which see their audiences in flyovers, [as] a mass of undifferentiated desires that lives below planes moving between Los Angeles and New York City (Corrigan 23). Run Lola Runs universal appeal relies on the films game-like structure, its non-descript locations, and its overly simplified narrative and character development with a minimum of dialogue. Whereas the directors of the New German Cinema of the seventies and eighties acknowledged their cultural and political baggage and embedded these themes into their films and characters, 56 Run Lola Run avoids any references that would limit its appeal to a particular target audience. 57 The non-diegetic techno soundtrack further enhances the films cool and therefore appealing atmosphere. 58 Tykwers approach is surely 55 However, eliminating national particularities from a film is not necessarily a mandate for subtitled European films to succeed internationally, as films such as Il postino (1994), Buena Vista Social Club (1999), and La vita bella (1999) have shown. Popularity cannot simply be conflated with universal appeal. 56 Again, the Oskar scream serves an exemplifying function. Whereas Grass and Schlndorfs Oskar screams to defy authority figures in Nazi Germany, Lola screams to defy the universal force of fate. 57 Nevertheless, the films theme, character, soundtrack and atmosphere tend to privilege a younger audience. Within the narrative, this manifests itself in the characterization of the older generation (especially Lolas parents) as immobile (the mother in particular), conservative, and predictable, whereas Lola and Manni appear mobile, trendy, and impulsive. 58 Caryl Flinn points out that Run Lola Runs soundtrack is globally recognizable because variants of this style can be found in many countries. She adds that perhaps another reason why techno crosses national

PAGE 161

152 motivated, in part, by economic interests, using a lowest common denominator market strategy. However, beyond these economic considerations, it is also an experiment in style. As I have argued, the film wallows in the remediation of other media, frequently quotes secondary cultural materials, and refuses to lay claim to an ultimate truth in its narrative. Tykwer abandons conventional vehicles for cinematic popularity such as linearity and closure in narrative, erasure of mediating agent, development of characters, and female stereotypes but never privileges originality as a mandate for his style either; the film is unconventional, yet strikingly familiar. This unoriginal and open attitude of Tykwers film again connects it to the computer game scene, where borrowing of stories, themes, techniques, and to some extent even code, is an accepted and standard practice. Tykwers experiment is successful, in part, due to the fact that he borrows the videogame style without openly quoting or acknowledging this new medium. However, he does not efface the relationship between the media either as for example some films do where special effects try to imitate physical reality, as if the scenes which were created on the computer had been filmed as they occurred naturally. Run Lola Run strikes a comfortable balance between appropriating and creating. In the film Lara Croft: Tomb Raider, conspicuous references to the videogame abound and turn the film into a secondboundaries so easily are its sampling, modulating, remixing, and looping [. .], techniques which, deflect any claim to authorial, romantic expressivity, authenticity, or originality, not to mention copyright. Furthermore, music and games both transcend linguistic national barriers because of their focus on nonverbal language.

PAGE 162

153 rate game-ersatz. 59 Laras running appears artificial and affected. Although Tykwers film is highly stylized, it uses its style in a productive and provocative manner. Through remediation of practices and aesthetics of another medium, Tykwers attempt at subverting convention and undermining natural cinematic constraints, while still retaining popular appeal, has been a successful one. Cinematic content, style, techniques, and the film industry as an institution have been affected by virtually every new visual technology of the latter half of the twentieth century. In the sixties television left a lasting impression, in the seventies and eighties video technology changed the medium substantially. Run Lola Run confirms that in the nineties digital technologies not only affect video, television, and photography, but can alter film aesthetics as well. 59 Lara Croft: Tomb Raiders attempt at cashing in on the Eidos Interactive games popularity is not its only problem. The film does not distinguish itself in any way from other Hollywood action spectacles loaded with special effects; it is predictable and trite.

PAGE 163

CHAPTER 5 STORAGE AND DISTRIBUTION THROUGH NEW MEDIA For the model is not set up in order to fix the style of performance; quite the contrary. The emphasis is on development: changes are to be provoked and to be made perceptible; sporadic and anarchic acts of creation are to be replaced by creative processes whose changes progress by steps or leaps. Bertolt Brecht, Brecht on Theatre Of the various and diverse influences of new media technology on film (the medium) and the cinema (the institution that disseminates it), storage media and distribution channels arguably rank highest in end-user impact and visibility. Storage and delivery influences the way that viewers are able to access, experience, and consume films. From the beginning, film expanded its ties to public exhibition spaces and, with the advent of television and video moved into the domestic realm, onto the computer screen and into cyberspace. It also diversified institutionally, moving with ease in and out of institutionally controlled (cinema and TV) and consumer manipulated (VCR & computer) venues. Indeed, these changes have not only affected viewers but, in some cases, the form, aesthetic make-up, and content of the films themselves. Film Storage and Distribution: From the Early Years to the Internet Although film is an invention of the late 19 th century, it did not function as an apparatus available to the masses until the early 20 th century. Film became institutionalized as a medium for public exhibition (the cinema) rather than privately consumed entertainment. This communal quality is not only a result of the technological and physical make-up of film projection equipment (its cost, size, and output) as well as 154

PAGE 164

155 the material nature of the medium itself (its dependence on projection for viewing) but also a result of the institutional forces that, from the beginning, co-opted film into social and political service, because it constituted a medium that was able to reach out to a large segment of the population. This is especially true for Germany, whose film industry blossomed into a successful enterprise during WWI when it was used to disseminate nationalistic propaganda. 1 Celluloid, the common storage medium for filmic images, was invented by Alexander Parkes in 1856, but its inventor did not immediately realize the photographic potential of the new material. Several years later, in 1870, the term celluloid was officially registered by John Wesley Hyatt of the Celluloid Manufacturing Company which used the material for billiard balls (as a substitute for ivory). It was not until 1895, just a few weeks before the Lumire screening in Paris, that Max Skladanowsky (along with his brothers Eugen and Emil), used celluloid (or cellulose nitrate) in his Bioskop camera/projector system to project the first motion pictures at the Berlin Wintergarten to a paying public. 2 This event not only inaugurated film viewing as a public spectacle and a commercial entertainment product, but also publicly introduced the use of celluloid as the 1 General Ludendorff described the film industry as an effective weapon of war (Kreimeier 24). The founding of Ufa (Universum-Film AG), the largest and most important German film company until 1945, was born out of this militarization of film after 1916 (21). The film industry was Germanized specifically through the government-controlled new company (36). Also, the number of movie houses almost doubled during the war years delivering films to a larger segment of the population. Movie theaters which refused to show patriotic films were threatened by the government to be shut down or cut off from electricity and coal. Although Germany produced 353 films in 1913, there was a lack of long feature films. During the last year of war, the film industry received an exorbitant amount of funding from the government, even though other cultural institutions support was cut drastically (17-38). And after the war, film productions soared to new heights to respond to the defeated Germans yearning for splendor and escape (Lotte Eisner, quoted in Kreimeier 34). 2 Wim Wenderss 1996 A Trick of the Light (Die Gebrder Skladanowsky) chronicles this historical event as well as the lives of the inventors Max Skladanowsky and his brother. He made this film in collaboration with students of the Munich Film Academy where he spent some time as Visiting Professor.

PAGE 165

156 primary source for image projection onto a cinema screen. 3 Although the exact make-up of the material would change over time, the term celluloid endured. From the 1980s through the 1940s film stock was primarily made of cellulose nitrate. Nitrate base achieved both favorable and negative effects. On the one hand it produced sharp and detailed images, but on the other it was highly flammable, even explosive, in nature. Moreover, nitrate base degenerates in a relatively short period of time (after only twenty years) in storage; it was moisture sensitive and contracted in size over time. Due to these drawbacks, in the 1950s, film stock made of cellulose tri-acetate, also called safety base, superceded cellulose nitrate. Even though cellulose tri-acetate could not achieve the rich tones and acute images of cellulose nitrate, its resistance to combustion as well as its improved storage life rendered it an overall better material. The earliest films were shot in black-and-white and without sound (although color was often physically imparted onto the film stock and orchestral, non-diegetic sound added during projection). In the 1930s, however, it became more and more widespread to record and project filmic images augmented by diegetic sound and in color. 4 In 1896 Germanys first permanent cinemas began operating in Berlin. But only a decade later the numbers had increased dramatically and included cities all over Germany. By 1911, there were more than 2000 cinema locations registered in the country. In the same year the first film palace opened in Berlin, the Cins at the 3 The Skladanowsky brothers showcased this screening as a type of circus variety show, as pure entertainment, replete with glitz and excitement (Kreimeier 9). The conception of films as spectacle continued to define cinema for decades to come. 4 In 1922 the German engineers and inventors Josef Engl, Hans Vogt, and Josef Massolle patent the Tri-Ergon process, a technology which enabled film stock to physically incorporate sound. On September 17, 1922 Der Brandstifter, the first film with integrated sound, is shown to the public at the Berlin Alhambra cinema. The Fox Film Corporation acquired the rights to the Tri-Ergon technology in 1927.

PAGE 166

157 Nollendorfplatz, which featured more than 1000 seats. Between 1920 and 1929 the number of theaters in Germany increased from 3,700 to 5,000. While the overall number of cinemas multiplied, the number of small theaters decreased steadily (replaced by more and more film palaces with more than 1,000 seats). In 1929 Ufa built the largest movie theater in Europe in Hamburg with 2,750 seats. Although these large arenas of film exhibition, for the most part, did not continue after WWII, a similar concept has been resurrected in the 1990s in the multiplex theater. The first German multiplex, comprised of 14 screens and 2,899 seats, opened in a shopping mall near Cologne in 1990. It was immediately followed by several other multi-screen, high volume cinemas such as the Cinemaxx in Hannover offering 10 screens and 3, 281 seats and the Cinedome, also in Cologne, with 13 screens and 3,183 seats. These numbers attest to the enduring popularity of film as a public attraction and the cinema as a site for social rituals, as well as to its commercial viability as a product consumed in a communal setting. However, although multiplexes demonstrate the continuing success of film exhibited in designated commercial spaces, since the 1960s there also exist alternate venues which are capable of delivering films to large audiences: television, pre-recorded videos and various other mobile storage devices (including optical and digital discs), and the Internet. Computer technologies, in particular, have had an enormous impact on film distribution and the institutional character of the cinema. Disseminating films, both nationally and internationally, will soon become a much less expensive task due to the digital delivery of films as bits. A studio can save on film prints (which cost $2000-$3000 a piece and can make up as much as 10% of production costs), reduce shipping expenses

PAGE 167

158 for the prints with satellite feeds, and theaters can eliminate costly transport systems which move films from one projection room to another (Entertainment). 5 Another digital distribution venue, the Internet, will effect the way films reach their audience in an even more transparent manner. Although the public has not yet embraced this technology as might have been expected, web-based pay-per-view is nevertheless likely to attract large audiences in the near future as download speeds increase and picture quality improves (which is only near DVD-quality as of yet). One of the first relatively well-known films to become accessible online on a pay-per-view basis was Pi (1999), Guinevere (1999), Eye of the Beholder (1999), and Hamlet (2000), others soon followed. 6 (Some films are specifically designed to be viewed only on the Web and are available to anyone, free of charge, for example at the ifilm, atomfilm, and inetfilm websites. 7 ) For audiences, such convenient and economical venues represent attractive alternatives to the conventional movie theater experience. The effect that digital technologies have already had on motion pictures and theaters and will have in the near future has the potential to 5 By 2005 digital data files will likely replace most film prints as storage and distribution medium (Entertainment). 6 The web-based pay-per-view option did not prove to be very popular for Pi, however; the webpage only registered 100 visitors who accessed the film in this way (Ziegenhagen 49). The Web advertising campaign for The Blair Witch Project (1999), on the other hand, which did not provide download-access to the film, became amazingly successful (over 10 Million visitors) (50). It added important enhancements to the film which lent the story more credibility and enigmatic appeal. In general, there has not been a great amount of support from Hollywood for using the Internet as an equal distribution venue to theaters. The Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences (AMPAS) decided in 2000, for example, to prohibit any film from being nominated for an Oscar that screened on the Internet prior to its theatrical release. After Pi, Miramax, in partnership with the technology corporation SightSound.com started distributing several of its films via the web. www.sightsound.com showcases hundreds of films available for download, from classics like His Girl Friday (1940) to features exclusively available on the SightSound website, such as Quantum Project (2000). 7 The web-addresses for these sites are, respectively, http://www.ifilm.com/, http://atomfilms.shockwave.com/af/home/, and http://www.inetfilm.com.

PAGE 168

159 parallel the impact satellite dishes and cable had on television, molding its institutional make-up and profoundly affecting its status as a popular medium. Before the advent of digital delivery of film, another visual medium was prompted into the service of film distribution (even though it initially threatened to become one of films most formidable rivals). Although television, released from its dependence on live sets by video storage technology, was able to broadcast films (originally destined for the cinema) as early as the mid-1950s, it was not until the 1970s and the proliferation of color television sets and increased availability of the video cassette recorder and tapes that an era of enhanced relationship between video and cinematic productions was inaugurated. Interestingly, in terms of resolution, color television initially caused a retrograde technological development in television sets and therefore separated the quality of the television image even more from cinema displays. In terms of image resolution, a monochrome picture was much sharper and brighter than a color picture due to additional lines and less difficult alignment registration. However, this decrease in image quality could not outweigh the positive impact that color had on using television as an exhibition venue. Films, once exclusively dependent on theaters for reaching large audiences, gained an additional outlet in the form of broadcast (and later cable, satellite and pay-per-view) television and could be sold as recordings on consumer videotapes. Although the fact that television is able to include a large portion of non-fiction commercial, cultural, and political information into its programming sets it somewhat apart from cinema, mainly a producer of fictional entertainment, and aligns it closer with such media as the Internet, the printed press and radio, it also encompasses the capacity to disseminate fiction and documentary films. Even though most films are intended for

PAGE 169

160 exhibition in a public space and made for large, high-resolution screens with sophisticated sound support, television and video, which both operate within the intimacy of the domestic sphere and offer limited display quality nonetheless quickly adapted to nourish their new ally. Films on CD-ROM: Valie Exports Medial Anagrams Building on the successful relationship between film and the media television and video, the movie industry began searching for a film storage format that could form a similarly productive liaison between film and the proliferating computer industry. Efforts were also underway to develop a more durable and compact format of film storage compared to celluloid and magnetic tape, one which could be used for a wide range of applications apart from film, and therefore satisfy the demands of a multifaceted industry (no longer singularly involved in film matters). This undertaking would eventually lead to the development of the DVD-Video. However, before the DVD format became available to consumers as a storage device and acted as distributing agent for pre-recorded films, the CD-ROM infiltrated the computer market in the mid-1980s as the storage medium of choice for software and videogames, as well as for the music industry. As Ann Friedberg points out, CD-ROMs had advantages over other technology (such as Laserdisc) in that they did not require a dedicated player, but could be accessed on a computer with the appropriate hardware and that they were backward compatible with music CDs because they were identical in size and format (34). The film industry, however, did not view the CD-ROM as a viable choice to replace VHS cassettes due to its limited capacity for storing the large quantities of data necessary to replay feature films. Although CD-ROMs did not constitute a practical solution to the quest of

PAGE 170

161 mainstream film business, it is not inherently a medium hostile to film technology, as Valie Exports CD-ROM Bilder der Berhrungen illustrates. Syntagma and its Function in Bilder der Berhrungen What interests me is that even minimal shifts in context will bring out differences in signification for the same unit of representation. It is a kind of language system for image production in the technological media. Valie Export, interviewed in Mueller, Fragments The Austrian feminist and avant-garde artist Valie Export has been producing essays, films, actions, videos, installations, photographs, performances, and multimedia projects since the mid-nineteen sixties. Although relatively well-known in Europe as an artist, Export has received little attention abroad, except as a filmmaker. In Europe, Export was and still remains one of the leading feminist artists working with experimental media. 8 Throughout her prolific career, spanning several decades and still very much in progress, she has been confronting the intersections of art and technology and interrogating how these relate to women and feminist concerns. In the CD-ROM Bilder der Berhrungen, 9 published in 1998 (in Englishimages produced by touching or images of touch [she never offers a translation for the title]), she re-frames and re-purposes her diverse aesthetic inquiries of more than thirty years and disseminates the results on CD-ROM. In other words, and as the basic premise, Bilder is a type of artistic portfolio which acquaints the user with Exports most important work of her career. On 8 In 2000, however, Moore College of Art and Design in Philadelphia (one of the only all-female art colleges that remain in the US) set out to broaden her exposure and organized her first solo North American exhibition. Since then the show has moved to other select cities and museums in the U.S.. 9 Henceforth, I will use alternately the abbreviation Bilder and the complete title to refer to Bilder der Berhrungen.

PAGE 171

162 another level, however, it presents itself as something more as an autonomous addition to her artistic uvre. In Bilder der Berhrungen, Export uses one of her experimental films, Syntagma (1983), as the centerpiece of the CD-ROM presentation. This is a fitting choice, because Syntagma has much in common with the formal aspects and artistic intentions of Bilder. Syntagma is a relatively short film of 18 minutes with little if narrative exposition and composed of short, seemingly separate units. It incorporates Exports previous artworks produced for different media, and it is situated about half-way into Exports career and therefore appropriate as a platform around which to stage work that chronologically precedes and follows it. In part, because of its length, Syntagma is well suited to the formal logic of the CD-ROM as a medium. Due to its limited capacity, offering no more than 800mb, the CD-ROM is a less than perfect medium to accommodate the storage and dissemination of films. In order for any feature-length film to be adapted to fit on a CD-ROM, it must be highly compromised, sacrificing both size and clarity of image in replay, or be split up onto several discs. Although the CD-ROM, widely available since the mid-1980s, was the first mobile storage medium to allow for films to be displayed on personal computers, it was quickly eclipsed by the now dominant format, the high capacity DVD-Video which can accommodate up to 4 hours of full-screen, full-motion video and several voice tracks on a single side. 10 A CD-ROM, on the other hand, only stores about a half hour of the same quality video. Nonetheless, serving as a link between films and computers granted 10 So far, a DVD-Video can appear in the format of DVD-5 (single-sided, 133 minutes of video), DVD-9 (dual layer, 240 minutes of video on one side), DVD-10 (double sided, 133 minutes of video on each side), and DVD-18 (dual layer, double sided, 240 minutes of video on each side).

PAGE 172

163 the CD-ROM special status as the storage medium of choice for many multimedia artists, at least until the DVD-ROM became available in 1997 (only one year before Bilder was published). And it is precisely because it represents a pivotal, transitional medium that I am focusing on the CD-ROM, for it reveals certain problems and highlights issues that arose with the shift from 35mm to the digital. As for Exports Bilder, CD-ROMs storage limitations have little effect on the presentation of the film. With the exception of the relatively small display size of Syntagma and the various additional images, the CD-format appears suited to Exports project. This is, in part, due to Syntagmas short duration, as well as to the lack of image clarity in the original (filmed in 16mm). Thus, the film can be shown in its entirety and still allow for ancillary material to be present on the same disc. As an experimental film, Syntagma consists of several separate units of meaning, structured in montage-like sequences. These sequences exhibit a very loose narrative structure overall, if any, and therefore is less resistant to interruptions which occur by clicking the mouse on other presented options while Syntagma is playing. Furthermore, Exports experimental film is assembled as a montage and intersplicing extra-filmic materials appears less distracting than it would in a film with fluid editing. On the CD-ROM, the representations of art, films and videos which are paired with Syntagma scenes often comment on the films thematic content, or elaborate on a visual point the film is making. 11 11 For example, at the beginning of Syntagma two strips of celluloid are physically separated by two hands. At the same time a postage-sized clip from The Practice of Love appears in the right-hand corner. When the user clicks on this clip, it enlarges to cover the Syntagma scene. The clip shows part a womans face looking through a rectangular space (as if in a cage) moving in an elevator-like (also film-strip-like) fashion. Only a few seconds of The Practice of Love are superimposed, then Syntagma is visible again showing the hands opening the celluloid strips. Juxtaposing these scenes has a two-fold effect: the montage of the scenes alerts viewers that both films treat the topic of women and their relation to film and show

PAGE 173

164 Syntagma, like Bilder, re-frames fragments and elements of Exports previous work, including her experimentation with film, video, photography, as well as aesthetic practices used in performances and installations. The film and CD-ROM both recycle Exports prior work as well as replicate certain techniques, and let them reappear removed from their original sites of display, such as community spaces, city streets, estranged from governmental and private patronage systems, such as private collections and museums. They are now situated into a new context, stored in an alien format, and displayed by a different medium. In the case of the CD, the reappropriation goes even further than in Syntagma. Here installations, videos and photographs of performances, experimental films, and extracts of feature-length films, as well as some of Exports critical writings on art have all been homogenized into a digital interactive executable file and preserved on disc in a mere 600 megabytes of storage space, creating an autobiography of sorts (centered around her work). Recycling existing ideas and products is a common tactic of the commercial world, where developers use and repurpose materials with name recognition in order to maximize their profits while minimizing economic risks. Export adopts this practice to some degree, not due to financial considerations, but presumably to make her transition and initiation to this new medium less challenging. With this practice, she has tapped into two of the most appealing characteristics of digital media: the accepted recycling of narratives, themes, techniques, and code, and the ability to display materials with a variety of material origins within one medium. that women can either force their way into this patriarchic apparatus (Syntagma) or be imprisoned by it (The Practice of Love).

PAGE 174

165 The name syntagma is derived from the Greek and refers to a collection of texts (or words) which, when assembled in a specific configuration, express a comprehensive idea. 12 In the montage sequences of the film Syntagma, the series of images are related by a similarity or contiguity that is established, specifically, by their placement in that particular series. In other words, although the individual film segments have meaning in and of themselves, the intended effect of these segments is only established within the films whole. This montage technique is also at the core of Bilders CD-ROM design and presented as a digital syntagma. Because all of the works featured have already exerted an artistic effect when they were originally composed and exhibited, only a placement into a new semantic and formal context, within a different medium and in a constellation made-up of different artistic works, can stimulate new interest and new meaning. And Export wants the user to pay attention to this new context, so that Bilder der Berhrungen can transgress the boundaries of the artists portfolio and become a work in its own right. Indeed, Export has never hesitated to recycle elements of her work, a product which she calls medial anagrams, and to place them within the context of a new or even similar piece. It is a practice that constitutes her artistic style. By extension, then, Bilder, adopts this approach to achieve a twofold goal: It serves as a retrospective of her career, and it represents Exports first experimentation with the CD-ROM as an aesthetic device. Valie Export began her career in the late nineteen sixties as part of the neo-avant-garde European art scene. Initially she was the only female to be associated with 12 Rather than interpreting the term syntagma as a compilation of individual segments, Christian Metz calls a syntagma an autonomous segment in itself which is only part of a greater whole. Metzs syntagma bears close resemblance (with exception of one out of eight described types) to what traditional film jargon would term a sequence. Exports film can support both meanings, but because the title is used in the singular, favors my interpretation.

PAGE 175

166 Viennese Actionism, a predominantly male group of performers, such as Gnter Brus, Peter Weibel, and Hermann Nitsch. 13 It is, of course, part of avant-garde practices to include experimentation with new technologies in an attempt to exceed the limitations of traditional media and subvert arts status as commodity. Export, however, always regarded her political agenda as necessarily influenced and determined by her feminist concerns. Her work tried to open up limited patterns of perception and representation, limited views of the natural and artificial image and space, and a limited concept of truth and reality (Mueller 219). Exports aesthetic practice straddles traditional boundaries set by media, art movements, gender, conventions, and the public sphere. In these areas she refuses to neatly submit to any pre-set limits, especially when those arise from gender-related issues. Intersections of Feminism and Technology Exports artistic production from the last three decades vary considerably with respect to the media employed, the exhibition venue, genre, and subject matter. Nonetheless, Exports feminist ideology, specifically the importance she places on the female body used as both subject and means for conveying her ideas, resonate throughout her uvre. 14 Since the 1980s Exports career has been influenced by her interest in exploring digital media and technologies. She argues that 13 Michael Rush points out that all of the male Actionist artists started out as painters, whereas Exports work used technological media from the start 14 Nora Alter argues in Imaging (Post)Gender that although Export has been focusing on the female body for most of her career, in her 1986/87 twelve-minute contribution to the omnibus film Seven Women Seven Sins, she specifically conflates gender identity and complicates binary or paired sexuality (273) to show that commodification affects women as well as men.

PAGE 176

167 [. .] there is nothing masculine about computer technology. [. .] The points of departure of expression, content, and representations may be gender specific but not the medium itself. If there is male dominance it also means that women have not tried hard enough to get a hold of the media and to use it for their goals. This is hard work because women have never been granted access without a struggle. (quoted in Mueller 215) In an effort to apply a Brechtian Umfunktionierung to the computer, albeit using a feminist rather than Marxist approach to the procedure, Export uses the CD-ROM Bilder in a similar way to her previously implemented technological gadgets to inquire into systems of perception as well as expand the parameters of those systems. She employs technology, as Monika Faber observes, contrary to those conventions that want to tie [it] into the existing systemin the sense of a neutral scientific innovation (213). For Export, in order to be artist and subject rather than model and object, it is necessary to be in command of the means of re-production, to be an image-maker not an image. The digital divide, a term which is generally used as a reference to economic barriers, is too often an issue not confined to class but one that also involves gender. Valie Export refuses to submit to such a divide. In her desire to be in control of how womens images are represented in new media art, she shares Donna Haraways belief that cyborg writing is about the power to survive, not on the basis of original innocence, but on the basis of seizing the tools to mark the world that marked [women] as other (Simians 175). Haraways cyborg is founded on the notion that [l]ate twentieth-century machines have made thoroughly ambiguous the difference between natural and artificial, mind and body, self-developing and externally designed, and many other distinctions that used to apply to organisms and machines. Our machines are disturbingly lively, and we ourselves frighteningly inert (152). The cyborg, a fusion of animal and machine, erases age-old oppositions such as

PAGE 177

168 nature and culture and therefore also affects the way we may think of natural, hence unchangeable, states. Since the technology is here to stay, argues Haraway further, we cannot go back ideologically or materially. Its not just that god is dead; so is goddess (162). In other words, the technological developments of the late twentieth century have had a profound impact upon women as well as men, but most importantly on ideological positions such as feminism. Feminism after the cyborg, which has come to be known as cyberfeminism, is based on the notion that, by using contemporary technology in specific ways, it is possible for women to construct identities, sexualities, gender, and other cultural codes in less restrictive ways. New technologies make it possible for women to co-define traditions and histories as they are in the process of being made. Cyberfeminism does not depart from traditional feminism completely, but rather takes feminism as its starting point, and turns its focus upon contemporary technologies, exploring the intersections between gender identity, the body, culture and technology (Brayton). Rather than viewing technology with suspicion because it was spawned by a patriarchal system, cyberfeminists such as Sadie Plant call for an alliance between women and technology (Brayton). In the same way that Haraway claims the cyborg to be the illegitimate offspring of militarism and patriarchal capitalism and concludes that cyborgs as illegitimate offspring are often exceedingly unfaithful to their origins (Simians 151), because their fathers are of no significance, cyberfeminists disregard the technological origin of most new media as inconsequential. Nonetheless, cyberfeminism does not disregard technological history altogether, neither does it erase the decades of struggle for womens equality, especially in the field

PAGE 178

169 of information technology. Instead, cyberfeminism incorporates the historical development of feminism into its own constitution and actively tries to redirect technologys male-biased trajectory; it builds on and reshapes, rather than breaks with tradition. Export supports this ideological position, in that she supplies a new apparatus, the CD-ROM, with work from preceding decades. The CD-ROM not only chronicles Exports untiring experimentation with emerging media, from video in the seventies to digital photography in the eighties and CD-ROM in the nineties, it also represents a record of her own continuously developing feminism. In Exports exposition via Bilder, both, technology and feminism, appear fluid and dynamic rather than restrictive and static. Although Mueller does not mention Exports work to be informed by cyberfeminism per se, she argues in Fragments of the Imagination that for Export technology is a potentially liberating agent which can release the biologically overdetermined body of the woman in patriarchy. In order to gain the status of subject in society (rather than remain forever the object), women must necessarily abandon what is often viewed as biology (Mueller 59). In order to achieve this, woman must become cyborg. However, abandoning biology, for Export, does not mean disregarding the body as an important socio-political factor thoroughly implicated in gender issues. On the contrary, her work stresses the fact that the female body has always played an important role in defining womens status quo in society. 15 In Bilder the viewer becomes acquainted 15 In Valie Export: Body, Space, Splitting, Projection, Chrissie Iles argues that Exports work engages in a struggle to define where the surface of the body ends and technology begins (40). I dont agree with this statement but contend that, for Export, these two seemingly opposing concepts merge into one, the body of the cyborg.

PAGE 179

170 with a variety of different artworks by Export, most of which either include and thematize the female body or its absence, as well as its representation in other media. Her emphatic casting of the body as a site where social pressures manifest themselves and questions of identity based on gender are raised, contests prevailing scientific and cultural discourses which aim at rendering the body superfluous and view consciousness as a unit separated from our incarnate selves. 16 As Katherine Hayles explains in How We Became Posthuman, this retro-discourse, based on age-old Cartesian beliefs that split the mind from the body, has been fueled by investigations into the nature of information (as early as the Macy Conferences on cybernetics from 1945 to 1960) and recent developments in digital technology. Increasingly, information is seen as abstract and is classified as either pattern or randomness. Hayles is keen on reintroducing the body into this conceptualization in order to demonstrate that there is a dynamic relationship between seemingly disembodied information and the materiality of the systems which originate, receive, and convey it. In her study, she unequivocally opposes the idea that to be posthuman should be equated with destroying that which physically constitutes the human being: his or her body. Rather, in Hayles view it is important to retain and include the human body as a container of a cognitive system which interacts and provides the interface for communicating with intelligent machines. A post-human, or cyborg in Haraways vocabulary, is located somewhere between this body and the machines which make it function in contemporary society. To be sure, deserting the body in a society that still affirms corporeal importance through fashion, prejudice, class and gender markers, 16 Export also casts the importance of body onto the origin of artistic production. She claims: I have always felt like a political artist and the female artist is the means to feminist art and feminist politics (Interview 268).

PAGE 180

171 pornography, violence, and eating disorders, has important implications for feminist concerns as well. Export, in her CD-ROM Bilder der Berhrungen, makes a conspicuous effort to implicate the body in the featured artwork, in the information retrieval, as well as in the original coding of the presentation. Everywhere in Bilder, the user is confronted with bodies and body parts of women who are being mutilated and tortured, appear as disembodied limbs, cast themselves as part of the landscape, merge with structures, and pose side by side with their projected double. The body is presented as artist and subject as well as employed as medium. The centerpiece of the CD-ROM, the film Syntagma, highlights the corporal as a thematic source even more strikingly. This short experimental film presents the image and body of woman as a heterogeneous and problematic entity, endowing it with resolute movement and potential for action in some scenes, while in others fragmenting and immobilizing the same. In the introductory sequence a disembodied voice proclaims: The body clearly takes a position between me and the world. On the one hand this body is the center of my world and on the other it is the object in the world of the others. The adaptation of this quote into images but also an interrogation of the implications of such statements becomes the films foremost intention. In the scenes that follow, the body is presented as interface on one hand and as an objectified fragment on the other. Likewise, the very first sequence of the film makes this point very clear. Syntagma begins with a pair of female hands forcing open two strips of celluloid. As Kaja Silverman remarks: The feminine real seems to be asserting itself over and against the fictions of the silver screen. But as the opening becomes larger, this hypothesis is discredited. The shapely hands signify

PAGE 181

172 culture, not nature; they are well-manicured, and their fingernails have been painted with red nail polish (214). The womans hands signify power in their action, but at the same time project impotence in their disembodied and beautified state. However, in an act of creative resistance against their disembodiment they manage to speak (literally) to the viewer, they announce the films title in sign language. 17 In the ensuing film Export continually juxtaposes the female bodys powerlessness and passivity with its potential for empowerment and action. Another sequence in Syntagma which appears twice presents a female actor in constant motion and shows her crossing a room from different angles, at varying speeds, and at times both of these styles spliced together. Mueller interprets these images as a feminist adaptation of Rilkes Panther, where the woman, entrapped in the domestic sphere, represents the captive panther pacing back and forth behind bars (187), a motion that betrays potential strength; pent-up explosive energy that reaches a pitch of accelerated frenzy (187-8). Similarly, in another sequence, Export contrasts the cut-up pieces of a black-and-white nude photograph with the body of a colorful female who appears to be a real person. The b/w cut-outs remind the viewer of the documentation of a murder victim; the female depicted lies completely immobilized and pallid against a backdrop of white, sanitized hospital-like sheets. Superimposed on this ghastly installation appears the real body with its prominently vibrant complexion as a vigorous agent interacting with the lifeless object and asserting its dominance over it by partially covering it. On yet another level, however, both of these female bodies, the photograph as well as the live model, are only representations of the real and part of a series of photographs in the style of 17 As Alexander Alberro points out, language plays a particularly important role in many of Exports artworks, especially incorporating the philosophical positions of Wittgenstein on language.

PAGE 182

173 Exports earlier work Ontological Leap, which are now, as part of the film, re-projected onto a screen. In the words of Silverman, for Export, there is no bodily reality which is not informed by representation, and no corporeal representation which does not have its real effects (215). Exports film does not want to present the body as a simple dichotomy of either dead or alive, powerful or weak, whole or fragmented, a physical representation of the self and an object to others but rather presents it as an entity in motion, able to represent both ends of the spectrum at the same time and intermittently. The womans image in Syntagma appears as part rather than the product of a process. Adequately representing this process is in the hands of filmmakers like Export. Apart from Syntagma, the focal point of the CD-ROM, Bilder also brings Valie Exports staging of the body as an important feminist project to the foreground in its interface design. She uses an image of a hand to stand in for the body, which represents both the artist as a producer of the CD-ROM and its images, as well as the user who retrieves, through movement of the mouse, the images and texts on the CD. The hand is a fitting icon which relates the bodys potential for action more obviously than any other body part. I will return again to this interface a little later to elaborate on its multifaceted purpose and complex meaning within the CD-ROM Bilder der Berhrungen. Interactivity Interactivity has become a buzzword in recent years for digital new media. In the realm of art, however, possibility for interactivity enjoys a longstanding tradition with certain artistic genre, such as installations and performances. Even Bertolt Brecht made use of this tool to involve spectators in his plays conceived as Lehrstcke. Interactivity necessarily involves the retreat of the artist as sole producer of meaning in the artwork. To a certain extent interactivity may be viewed as a natural outgrowth from post

PAGE 183

174 structuralism, where meaning can no longer be located entirely with the text but rather is produced by the subjective response of the recipient. Exports feminist perspective allows her thus to dislodge and decenter the patriarchal notion of the author as the center of creativity. In the 1990s, Exports art almost naturally converges with digital technologies such as the CD-ROM. Not only has she always striven to incorporate innovative techniques and technological novelties into her experimentations, she has also cultivated a long-standing tradition that utilizes interactive opportunities for the audience. For example, as early as 1968 she gave cinema an added dimension and sensory extension in her Tap and Touch Cinema. She has also included bystanders in her performance in Homometer II. And in her video installation Autohypnosis she invited museum visitors to step on words displayed on the floor, which, when activated in a specific sequence, would prompt a pre-recorded video segment on a monitor to play. 18 In many new media artistic creations the role of the viewer is an active one (in contrast to the traditional passive relationship between viewer and artwork, as with paintings). Of course an active form of observation is dependent on the degree of interactivity built into the artwork. (I will return to and explore further this notion in regard to Exports Bilder) In the case of interactive CD-ROMs, there is often a high degree of possibility for interaction, as the name implies. In Bilder many of the interactive elements of the CD-ROM focus on the act of navigation to access the more 18 Other interactive artworks include Ping Pong (1968), Ohne Titel (1968), Auf+Ab+An+Zu (1968), and Das magische Auge (1969). When Export called Auf+Ab+An+Zu a Lehrfilm, she made explicit her connection and aesthetic lineage to Brecht.

PAGE 184

175 than 50 examples of Exports work. Moreover, a significant portion of the interactive opportunities arise through an interplay with the film Syntagma. Although video and film have been used by other artists to preserve immaterial art more or less permanently, for example as recordings of installations and performances on film, video and in photographs, Bilder allows Export to go one step further. CD-ROM can function as an expert medium to perform the art of bricolage; it can display works originally meant to be shown as moving images as well as recordings of artworks that are not. But it can also assemble and collectively display all these various types of representations in one discrete physical medium as well as add an additional performative dimension to the artwork through the interactivity built into the CD-ROM. The question becomes: How to interact with an interactive artwork? Although performative art that leaves little or no trace after it is completed transmutes to become a permanent record, one original aspect of these pieces survives in the CD-ROM medium unlike in a recording. An interactive artwork can only be described and critiqued in one way but experienced in many. Any description is of a personal and singular experience not a general portrait as is the case in filmed or photographed installations and performances. Through its interactive design, the CD-ROM as a medium is far removed from film and video and closer aligned with performances and installations; whereas film and video produce permanent and singular records, the CD-ROM presents ephemeral and dynamic compositions. The Interface as Mise-en-Abyme The main interface, the portal to all interactive applications, plays an important and interesting role in the navigation of CD-ROM applications and is especially influential in Bilder. The CD-ROM interface in general does not simply perform the function of

PAGE 185

176 establishing a genre, mood, or relationship with the spectator (as is the case with the establishing shot in cinema, for example). It is a recurring component, continually confronting the participant with its regulating functions but also with its aesthetic comments on the materials presented; it is an intermediary agent between artist and user. In Valie Exports CD-ROM Bilder der Berhrungen, the interface performs the title of the work, both aesthetically and formally. It acts as a mise-en-abyme within the entire presentation, because, as Gregory Ulmer explains, it shows what it is telling, does what it says, displays its own making, reflects its own action (Grammatology). When the participant tours the interface with the mouse, his or her movements activate two intersecting lines. When the intersecting points of these lines pass over a hot spot, a user access point, they lead, in conjunction with a mouse-click, to the various parts of the CD. The sections that become activated provide access to representations of Exports work. The artists images have literally become Bilder der Berhrungen, images produced by touching and/or contact. As already mentioned, the hand shown on the interface represents the users own active body part involved in the production of meaning as well as alludes to the artists involvement in producing the artwork in the first place. The user of the CD-ROM as well as the artist are both playing their part in producing this artistic experience. The CD title and interface complement each other nicely here, because they bring out the hypermediated space of the interactive work itself. By hypermediated, I am referring to Bolter and Grusins definition of the term, where hypermediation signifies a style of visual representation whose goal is to remind the viewer of the medium (272) (the opposite of this effect would be immediacy or transparency where the viewer is

PAGE 186

177 supposed to forget that what is presented is going through a mediating filter, virtual reality representing an extreme example). Through the interface and title the participant is reminded that although the images are representations of Exports own art, the constellation and retrieval of these images are to some degree controlled by the user. Additionally, the title, Bilder der Berhrungen, captures the ambiguousness of the word touch in a digital world, as in images that are produced by the touch of the mouse in physical space and through the virtual touch of simulated intersecting lines on the screen. Through the interface alone, and by highlighting its constructed nature, Exports CD-ROM has achieved a critical distance in the user. Since the interface serves the function of entrance, exit, and intermediary throughout the interactive experience, there is no risk of the user ever repressing the mediating element or agency nor his or her own function as an active producer of meaning. The prominent position of Syntagma in the interface as well as the CD itself offers another instance of hypermediation. The film uses many allusions to multiple distances, such as in the recording of an image which is itself a projection, through mirror reflections, photographic representations and recorded images themselves. Syntagma, as well as the CD-ROM, thematize the act of adaptation and transpose their raw material from one medium into another. The user and viewer becomes keenly aware of the fact that images are purposefully created and assembled. 19 The act of mediation and the agent/creator are foregrounded at the expense of natural images. 19 By retaining the montage sequences in Syntagma and adding montage to the CD-ROM presentation, Export has retained and intensified the hypermediated style of montage. As Margaret Eifler explains in an essay on Exports film Invisible Adversaries, the montage techniques make the act of perceiving the film a part of the experience of it (254).

PAGE 187

178 The interface mise-en-abyme also achieves another very critical function: Many digital media exhibit difficulty in sustaining long and drawn-out arguments or narratives, elements that are part and parcel of the Western literary tradition, the classic case in point being hypertext. 20 The option of clicking and therefore leaving or diverging from the presented argument or presentation is always there and often even encouraged. Every page must be able to stand on its own, because the creator cannot rely on any specific prior knowledge on behalf of the visitor, since point of entry and trajectory may be different for each user. In order for digital media to keep from what Peter Lunenfeld calls atomizing discourse, meaning, to collapse discourse to such an extent that it loses all meaning and significance, they must include opportunities for nano-thought (53). Nano-thought consists of ideas, metaphors, and images processed down to their smallest units, and then repeated [. .] throughout digital databases (173). 21 The mise-en-abyme as interface, when employed skillfully as it is in Exports CD, can be a superb vehicle for nano-thought, one which is both profound and sustaining. When navigating Bilder, one is constantly reminded through the interface mise-en-abyme that these artworks as well as the film Syntagma, originally distributed via and created by older representational systems, can attain new life and new meaning in a digital environment, because the technical, historical, as well as the social context in which these works originally 20 Ulmer proposes in Grammatology Hypermedia that the mise-en-abyme can function as a discourse of immanent critique, a type of critique that operates from within the medium in question. He further suggests that a combination of mise-en-abyme, montage, and mise-en-scne can lead to a deconstructive criticism, an inventio, that fits the electronic media better than a conventional book-type criticism. 21 Lunenfeld considers nano-thought to be a potentially negative product of electronic media. I contend, however, that condensing meaning into the smallest unit possible serves the formal makeup of media such as hypertext or the CD-ROM best.

PAGE 188

179 appeared has been transformed completely. And most importantly, the user has played an active role in creating this mutated context. Another characteristic of the formal nature of a CD-ROM links Bilder again to Syntagma. The film, in part, articulates the split of feminine corporality into a private and a public body, the former a reification of the self and the latter an object in the world of the others. The CD as a distributing agent of art replacing the museum, cinema, or street, also invokes this split and opposition of public and private spheres. To be sure, the move from a public exhibition space to the solitary experience of interacting with the computer screen certainly must affect the reception of the presented art and film. For one, there is a certain surrender of power to which the artist must agree. Not only are users allowed to access the material in a more or less random fashion, there is also no guarantee that the display medium will perform as expected. All monitors present visual materials with a varying degree of quality, an extreme example being the LCD-display of a laptop versus the conventional desktop monitor. There is other hardware to consider as well such as processor speed and memory, and not least of all the unpredictability of software performance (Lunenfeld 14-17). In short, an artist can only hope that her or his product will reach the audience in the way she or he intended. In public displays, the amount of artistic control is heightened through physical participation and/or legal protection. Lunenfeld argues that video artists routinely embrace this controlled display space. He calls it the black room fetish, the desire to transform portions of galleries, museums or found spaces into videothques, darkened pseudocinemas for the contemplation of the video artwork (137).

PAGE 189

180 On the other hand, however, a CD-ROM can also democratize access to certain hard-to-obtain artistic creations or difficult-to-visit exhibitions. Demographics become secondary with the CD-ROM medium. This is especially true in regard to avant-garde works such as Export has been producing, specifically her films. Not only is a visit to a New York museum, gallery, or arthouse cinema out of reach for many, the purchase of a $300 and up, 18-minute film (such as Syntagma) is often not a feasible option either (with DVDs this economic consideration becomes a bit more complicated. However, when Bilder was created, DVDs were only beginning to infiltrate the consumer market). A $25 CD-ROM, on the other hand, readily available via the Internet, can grant access to Exports art and her film to a much broader audience. Less control over product versus greater distribution potential is a trade-off an artist is often willing to make. This is especially applicable to the market of avant-garde/experimental films. Limits and Control As I mentioned already, CD-ROM presentations abandon to some degree the claim of artistic autonomy, once thought to be an integral part of any artwork, for their production of meaning. They function in a similar way to hypertextual applications on the Internet but without the limitations posed by bandwidth as well as lacking the possibility for interplay with outside materials and people (except in those cases where CD-ROMs integrate links to the Internet). Because they are contained in their form, they are based on ROM (read-only-memory) and limited to that which is permanently encoded on the CD, these interactive applications are more controlled and controllable (by the author/programmer). This feature can be approached from a positive standpoint: meaning and learning is directed and mediated, or from a negative one: meaning and learning is directed and mediated. Thus, it is important to interrogate the CD not only according to

PAGE 190

181 what and how material is presented but also to deal with the limits that authors have applied to these digital worlds, so that we do not mistake the structure of somebody elses mind for our own (Manovich 61). It is precisely in the limitations set in the technical realization of Bilder where the CD fails to live up to its artistic potential. The gap between theory and actualization represents a trap for many new media filmmakers and artists (see also Wenders in chapter 3). The user has too little control over the content and presentation to be genuinely involved in the production of new meaning. The CD-ROM Bilder der Berhrungen has too much in common with other non-interactive representational apparatuses such as museum installations, video, photography, and the cinema. Although much of the work Export presents on Bilder was originally conceived for these audience-passive media and spaces, a new presentation of these pieces could have embraced more of the formal capacities and opportunities which the CD-ROM offers. Instead, in several of its main parts, the CD-ROM mimics the non-interactive video installation in a museum which persistently runs while audiences come and go, or the cinema, where viewers sit and watch an uninterrupted presentation. If Syntagma or Playback is clicked, for example, the application starts running continuously without any user input whatsoever (although it does not repeat automatically). Even the Exit sequence under Credits cannot be suspended, skipped, or otherwise influenced. Every time the user leaves the program, he or she must sit through the same lengthy sequence of events, digest corporate logos and read through financial support information, all of which takes almost a minute. Although Export disrupts the semantic context of the Syntagma sequences by providing an option to intersperse images and video clips from her other work, this

PAGE 191

182 practice does not produce much in the way of the unexpected. This is primarily due to the limited time that each image or scene is available for clicking as well as the prearranged selection of work which is available to be paired with each particular Syntagma scene. In other words, Export has pre-determined, to some degree, every new combination of images instead of letting the user combine and contrast her work independently. Of course, the user can opt not to click, but without any disruptions, neither the film nor the artworks context changes, and therefore neither does the original meaning. The limited interactive opportunities are especially apparent in the presentation of Syntagma. There is no random scene access available, nor can the film be fast forwarded, rewound, or otherwise played in a non-cinematic manner (except be interrupted). 22 The images that comprise the film can neither be manipulated, such as distorted in size or focus, nor can scenes be cut or rearranged, and no slow-motion or freeze frames are available. The only possible interaction with the film relies exclusively on the peripheral images and video clips which have been pre-arranged by Export and appear at strategic moments during the film for specific periods of time. In many ways Syntagma stays true to its original cinematic form, although it is no longer formally obligated to do so. What remains does not exceed or subvert the conventional art portfolio in a radical way, and it cannot aspire to fully realize Exports ambitious claim found on the CD-insert to the fullest degree possible. There she proclaims: The CD-ROM should not be regarded as a documentation of my works, it is an individually artistic work that stands for itself. Although there are plenty of promising concepts introduced in Bilder der 22 Even a VHS tape would offer more interactive possibilities since videos can be rewound, fast-forwarded, and paused.

PAGE 192

183 Berhrungen, ultimately, the artists excessive control over the material presented fetters the mediums potential for creative interaction and unpredictability. The Next Generation of Film Storage: The DVD-Video Because CD-ROMs limited storage capacity renders it a somewhat innocuous competitor to earlier and later technologies of film storage and delivery, such as VHS, Laserdiscs, digital video streaming, and DVDs, it had to make way for a format better adapted to satisfy the requirements of digital film storage and distribution. Laserdisc Makes Way for DVD-Video In 1972 Philips and MCA first introduced consumer laser video (better known as Laserdisc or simply LD), an optical disc technology that stored analog video and audio information (digital data followed in the eighties). LDs picture and sound quality, durability, random access, and still-frame capability constituted a vast improvement over what could be achieved in the VHS format. Nonetheless, Laserdiscs never pervaded the consumer market as VHS tapes did and eventually perished as a technology altogether (in 1999) after the DVD-video format became widely available. Reasons why Laserdiscs could not prevail in the marketplace vary among sources, some conjectures include Laserdiscs inability to act as a recording medium, their relatively large size and high price compared to VHS, as well as limited film title availability, etc. Although there subsists disagreement about why the disc did not succeed as a playback device for films with consumers, there exists relative consensus about why manufacturers eventually completely abandoned the hardware and software production: the immediate success of another storage technology, the DVD-Video. Since emerging on the consumer market in 1996 in Japan (1997 in the US, 1998 in Europe), DVDs (digital versatile disc) have become the fastest growing consumer

PAGE 193

184 electronics technology ever. 23 Within a few years it will be difficult to find films on either Laserdisc or VHS. For now, VHS still has the advantage of being able to record external material easily and inexpensively. However recordable DVDs are already beginning to appear on the market, and the hardware will eventually drop in price to appeal to a larger number of consumers. The availability and technical development of mass-market, writable DVD-Rs, DVD-RWs and the accompanying hardware was and still is somewhat stifled by piracy concerns. Even though these concerns have spawned counteractive measures by the film industry, some of which include region-restrictive encoding, DVD-Videos encoding represents a global standard for pre-recorded video. 24 The specifications were originally written and are being maintained by the DVD Forum, an international association of hardware manufacturers, software firms and other users of DVDs, founded in 1995 under the name DVD Consortium. 25 DVD-Video can store a 133-240 minute (4.7 8.5 GB) 23 Similarly to the CD-ROM, one of the reasons DVD hardware is so popular is its backward compatibility with other CD media, i.e., DVD-players can also read music CDs and CD-ROMs. 24 Although DVDs are coded in a language that is universal and a source for potentially flawless copies, manufacturers of the hardware and film studios have devised techniques which will assure higher market profits and resistance to piracy. DVD-Video includes a region-specific encoding to restrict playing content to remain within geographic regions. The regions are numbered 1 through 6 and do not follow strict geographic alignments. For example DVDs for South Africa are Region 2 encoded, the same as Europe, the Middle East, and Japan, whereas the rest of the African continent shares Region 5 with the Russian Federation, India, and Pakistan. The practice of region coding was initiated by motion picture studios in the US in order to achieve higher control over the release of films in other countries. Films are released on DVD at different times around the world, typically the US and Canada first, then Australia and Japan, followed by Europe and the rest of the world. In rare cases, DVD movies are available for purchase in the US and Canada before they are released in European cinemas. Increasingly, DVD hardware manufacturers are deliberately undermining the system and offer players that will ignore the region coding or publish cheat codes to override the region block and play DVDs from any country. As the release windows worldwide are getting closer and more users find ways to circumvent the restrictive coding, it is becoming more and more likely that the practice will be altogether abandoned in the future. Nonetheless, varying price schemes for DVDs in different countries as well as censorship issues may continue the practice of region coding and spawn new technologies to enforce resistance to disruption. 25 The DVD consortium was originally comprised of ten technology-related companies, Hitachi, Matsushita, Mitsubishi, Philips, Pioneer, Sony, Thomson, Time Warner, Toshiba, and JVC.

PAGE 194

185 MPEG-2 encoded film on one side of a single disc. A dual-sided disc can hold between four and eight hours of full-screen, full-motion video. DVD-Video supports CD quality, multi-channel surround sound, subtitles, various display formats (e.g., pan-and-scan, letterbox, widescreen, full-screen), and user options for non-linear interaction with the video. Its resolution is considerably better than Laserdisc. It can store up to eight spoken languages and subtitles for forty languages on one disc. It also includes parental lockout controls, copy protection, and region-specific coding. Many DVDs include cast and crew biographies, directors or actors commentaries, making-of documentaries, links to websites or even incorporate a full game based on the movie. In addition to using DVDs as a storage medium for films (DVD-Video), the digital versatile disc can also contain games, software (as DVD-ROM), and audio tracks (as DVD-Audio). DVD-R, DVD-RAM, and DVD-RW are all standards that allow consumers to record content of their own choosing. DVD-Videos propensity to fall victim to copyright infringements has inhibited some filmmakers and studios from releasing their titles in that format. The high quality of the DVD image as well as its internal digital code make it much more appealing as a source for copies than, for example, a VHS tape. First generation copies of films on DVD often contain very little image degradation and the digital encoding of the film onto disc translates well into other computer-related environments such as the Internet. 26 26 Increasingly, copies of high-profile films are traded via the Internet (sometimes before they even premiere in theaters). This practice has become progressively troublesome to the film industry and one counteraction to such piracy is the incorporation of copy protection into DVD-players and on the discs themselves. Copy protection is achieved in a twofold process either through analogue or digital methods and often by employing both. Digital copy protection (Content Scrambling System) involves scrambling and encrypting raw data whereas analog copy protection relies on an older technology developed by Macrovision, a protection which is also in use by VHS-tapes. Macrovision distorts the composite video output, a process only visible on illegally copied tapes and not on the original.

PAGE 195

186 Even though institutional restraints, such as region-coding and copyright protection have been put in place for DVDs, just as other medium-specific controls have affected earlier technologies of film storage, DVDs (as well as VCRs and Laserdiscs) have helped to somewhat liberate films of their institutionally dependent nature shaped by theater policies and projection technologies, advertising campaigns, and cinema demographics. DVD-Videos, in particular, have had a profound influence upon these practices. Due to the relatively low costs of digital versatile disc production (even lower than VHS-tape manufacturing), many films aimed at audiences whose taste resists mainstream fare have a chance to be seen on DVD by viewers who live outside of metropolitan areas or are isolated from certain cultural centers. This availability issue is becoming more pronounced with the emergence of online DVD rental companies such as Netflix (even though Netflixs DVD selection, as of yet, is restricted to mostly popular films). Non-Hollywood features are also available through other Internet channels, for example through distributors who use non-commercial films as their niche to compete against chain rental companies, such as Hollywood Video or Blockbuster Video. One of the most useful and distinctive features of DVD-Videos, in comparison to VHS videos (and to a lesser degree Laserdiscs), is the possibility of extended interactivity with the content material. Not only do menus offer random, non-linear, access to certain parts of the film, they can also lead to a wealth of related material, such as biographies, the making of documentaries, commentaries by directors, actors, or even film scholars, trailers, still pictures, and multiple angles, to name but a few. 27 The range and magnitude 27 The multiple angle option is often found on adult entertainment DVDs and has even become a euphemism (multiple-angle DVD) for discs containing pornographic material. To give viewers access to scenes shot from different angles in large-scale productions would not only be an expensive and labor

PAGE 196

187 of interactivity for DVD-video is not unlimited, however; it is restricted by the storage capacity and programming structure of the disc. Some DVDs bypass this limitation by including links to websites which offer additional content. Naturally, these links can only be accessed if the disc is played on an Internet-ready computer or Web-TV. Links to the Internet sites that provide supplemental information relevant to the original content of the disc offers film distributors, producers, directors, actors, and other parties involved in the film an additional outlet for their products. Similar films, movie gear, computer games based on the film, and many other items can be targeted at an audience that is already predisposed to be interested in such merchandise. Making Films Special: DVD Packaging and Marketing Manufacturers of Laserdiscs, in collaboration with the film industry, pioneered the practice of releasing films in different versions, as special editions, to satisfy the interest of film buffs who wanted to see not only the official product mirroring the theatrical release but also desired to get a glimpse of the directors vision without commercial restraints, or get insights into the art of movie-making via a making of documentary. DVDs have developed the special edition niche into a vastly popular practice. The Laserdisc format was not only a forerunner in releasing alternate versions of major feature films in special editions, it also inaugurated the practice of supplying extra materials complementing the main feature. Again, DVDs have picked up on this practice and expanded it considerably. Additional features on DVDs vary widely and are, to some degree, dependant on the original release date of the films themselves. Most importantly, the quality and intensive venture, it would also, in some cases, undermine the directors specific use of an angle to achieve a certain effect. Many directors are not willing to surrender their vision to satisfy viewers curiosity.

PAGE 197

188 quantity of the added materials depend on the overall quality of the DVD release. Certain distributors, such as Kino International, will produce a slightly more expensive version of a film on DVD, but also put more effort in achieving excellent image and sound output, as well as include interesting and well researched ancillary material. For example, The Cabinet of Dr. Caligari, part of The Masterworks of German Horror Classics collection, includes a rare clip from another Robert Wiene film Genuine. And Nosferatu, part of the same collection, offers a glance at some of the original drawings made for the film by Albert Grau. Similarly, On Berlin, Symphony of a Great City, Image Entertainment makes another Ruttmann film, the ten-minute Opus I (1922), available to viewers. Opus I shows the range of Ruttmanns filmic uvre, which was not confined to realistic film footage output, but also included experimentation with highly abstract geographic shapes and colors. A more recent film The Lost Honor of Katharina Blum (1975), made available on DVD by Home Vision Entertainment (2003), includes two separate video interviews, one of the directors and another of the director of photography, as well as a documentary of the author Heinrich Bll, who adapted his own novel to serve as the screenplay of the film. Because The Lost Honor chronicles events which take place during a very specific historical time period in Germany and focuses on the controversial crack-down of police in the wake of terrorism attacks by the Baader-Meinhof Group, the additional features on the DVD provide background information for viewers too young to remember these incidents or not familiar with the particularities of German history. The bonus materials on these examples not only add an additional entertainment value to the DVD but also provide a context for the main feature that augments the viewers experience as well as enriches the films meaning.

PAGE 198

189 Apart from adding materials supplementary to the main feature, many DVDs of more recent films also include commentaries by the director and/or other people involved in the films production which is presented as part of the film itself. The voice-over comments usually span the entire length of the feature and drown out the original soundtrack. These commentaries are especially popular with auteur directors such as Wenders, Herzog, and Tykwer. The chance to explain their vision to viewers and therefore control not only the production of the film but also its reception seems to appeal to these directors. This is especially relevant in the case of Wenders, who has been producing critical commentaries, interviews, and essays influencing the reception of his own films and the state of the cinema in general, published in written form, for years. Directors who have not been as prolific as Wenders in the field of film criticism are apparently also welcoming the chance to send off their films with a how to understand and see my images and story correctly auditory manual. In many cases, the directorial commentaries are self-indulging rather than thought-provoking and offer little in the way of critical refection. Occasionally, they offer a glimpse into the technical difficulties of shooting particular scenes or the challenge of adapting non-filmic materials to the screen. Or, the comments may provide the viewer with information pertaining to the personal motivations, shortcomings, fears, and thrills experienced by directors and, in some cases, actors or others involved in the final product. Voice-over commentaries are different from interviews concerning a particular film, even though both share the directors (or actors) opinion with the audience. Voice-overs are part of the original product itself and refer to very specific moments as they unfold on the screen. Such commentary is a much more effective tool in shaping the reception of a film (which is why the voice-over is

PAGE 199

190 often implemented with documentaries and non-fiction films which tend to have a didactic purpose). Excessive directorial intervention in viewer reception is arguably one negative effect emerging from the added materials supplied by the DVD format. The influence on documentary film practices represents another. Nick Redman, documentary producer of The Wild Bunch: An Album in Montage (1996), comments on the negative impact DVD extras have had on his specific branch of filmmaking: DVD has changed things for the worse, because now studios think that every bad movie should be a special edition, so there is nothing special about it any more. The climate would not allow for An Album in Montage today because DVD budgets are at an all-time low and the junky behind-the-scenes documentaries are just amateurish electronic press kits, being made by trailer-cutters. A proper documentary needs a budget and more importantly, time, to realise it [. .] Studios will not hire real documentarians to do DVD documentaries, they don't believe in the projects enough to care about quality. They just want it cheap ... and yesterday. In other words, the making of featurettes that accompany many DVDs are more likely a commercial gimmick than an attempt at introducing the viewers to the complexities and the collaborative labor efforts that constitute feature film productions. Nonetheless, seeing the make belief world of films for what it is, a constructed and highly manipulated environment, can transform the transparent film medium (which strives to appear as real life) into a hypermediated product (a constructed, mimetic reality). Moreover, documentaries filmed specifically for a DVD release only appear packaged with films made after 1997 when the medium became available to the general public. Documentaries that accompany films from before 1997, re-released on DVD, are traditionally produced and crafted films. There are plenty of films originally released before DVDs appearance on the consumer market that, as a re-release, take advantage of the higher quality and more

PAGE 200

191 durable storage capacity of these discs. Vintage films, often digitally remastered and restored, have enjoyed somewhat of a comeback through the DVD market. This is especially true of non-US cinema classics, such as films produced in the Weimar Republic. 28 Unlike with contemporary films, these classics exist in different qualities and versions due to their age, censorship issues, and varying restoration processes. Metropolis is a case in point here, because there exist numerous versions of the same film. The original, which premiered at the Ufa Palace in Berlin was 13,701 feet long and lasted 153 minutes (at 24 fps). However, soon thereafter Paramount Pictures and Ufa decided to cut the film to what was then considered to be normal length in order to maximize Metropoliss commercial potential; after all, this film had broken records in production costs. From 1927 until the 1980s, a variety of versions at various lengths, all derived from the Paramount/UFA cut circulated the globe. The East German Film Archive (Staatliches Filmarchiv der DDR) assembled an improved version between 1968 and 1972, but this print still only amounted to half of the originals length. In 1984 the composer Georgio Moroder acquired the rights to the film and updated the material by 28 Recent years have seen DVD releases of classics such as Berlin, Symphony of a Great City, The Golem, The Cabinet of Dr. Caligari, Nosferatu, Dr. Mabuse: The Gambler, Metropolis, The Last Laugh, Spies, M, Diary of a Lost Girl, Faust, The Blue Angel, Die Nibelungen, Triumph of the Will, and many others. Fritz Lang and G.W. Pabst are represented by a remarkable number of films on DVD. (The DVDs mentioned in this section all refer to editions produced for the US or UK market. Although the films discussed are German films, the DVD availability for Weimar or New German Cinema films in Germany has either not caught up with the US and UK market or is responding to a lack in consumer interest.) Some of these films are even available in multiple formats and on different DVD editions. They can be found on themed collection DVDs such as The Masterworks of the German Horror Cinema which includes The Golem, Nosferatu, and The Cabinet of Dr. Caligari, or the low-priced, but equally low-quality Navarre Corporation release of Horror Classics Triple Feature, Vol. 1, which features Metropolis and Nosferatu (as well as the French The Phantom of the Opera) or on special edition releases such as the Image Entertainment version of Nosferatu which includes several extras that are missing from the Kino International release. Although additional material may differ from version to version, one would expect the feature presentation to be the same. This, however, is not always a given. On the contrary, different editions can vary greatly as to the content of the main attraction. The otherwise high-quality themed set and aforementioned The Masterworks of the German Horror Cinema (Elite Entertainment), for example, includes a version of The Golem that is almost 30 minutes shorter than the one available on VHS.

PAGE 201

192 re-cutting scenes, adding stills, subtitles, and color tinting. The newly composed score used contemporary pop music songs and ran 87 minutes. The Munich version from 1987 tried to improve upon all other existing versions by making use of newly acquired original footage and the orignial score by Huppertz. In 1998 the film archivist Martin Koerber began yet another restoration process of Metropolis and successfully completed the project in 2001. This restoration was the first to utilize digital imaging tools which eliminated or reduced physical damage, scratches, and dust, all due to the advanced age of the film. In celebration of its 75 th anniversary Kino International released this version as what they call the definitive restoration of Fritz Langs Metropolis into select theaters. It was instantly greeted with critical praise and recently won the Film Heritage Prize from the National Society of Film Critics. Thanks to the market viability of the DVD-format and Kinos success in the DVD-market niche of vintage films, the Kino theater release was made available in that format in February of 2003 to a broader audience and affordable to film scholars, collectors and casual enthusiasts alike. 29 All DVDs are not created equal, especially when dealing with cinema classics which often have several sources defining their content and with various DVD 29 In addition to the latest Kino restoration release, several competing variants of Metropolis are available on the DVD market. Although at 115 minutes, the Hollywood Classics edition of Metropolis (produced by Madacy Entertainment), presents a relatively long version of the film, the transfer to DVD is so poor that many of the intertitles and even the main title appear partially cut off. This version also lacks in image and sound quality in comparison to other Metropolis editions. Generally, transfer of films onto DVD results in a better quality copy than transfers to other storage formats, such as VHS and laserdisc. Even though, just like with other formats, the relocation from 35mm to DVD begins with a telecine, a machine that acts like an electronic film projector, the process for DVD transfer has a higher quality standard. The telecine projects light through the individual film frames and strikes an arrangement of semiconductors which convert the light to electrical signals. This information is transferred to High Definition video, color is corrected, and then compressed into the Mpeg-2 video compression standard which reduces the High Definition video file to a faction of its original size. A similar case is Fritz Langs M which is available in several editions as well. In the Europa Theatre Series (Whirlwind Media Inc.) M appears packaged with another Lang classic, the 1928 Spies. On this DVD M only runs 71 minutes while the original, available on a Criterion DVD release, lasts 110 minutes.

PAGE 202

193 manufacturers competing for price and quality. Although similar issues arise for VHS productions, the availability and hence marketing is greatly reduced in comparison to mass-market DVDs; therefore the problem appears magnified in the latter medium. Also, viewers are accustomed to the high potential image resolution of DVD features and consequently notice shoddy quality more than in the VHS format. DVDs have resurrected many of the traditional problems in the distribution of Weimar Cinema classics but in an amplified form. What is particularly significant with these film classics appearing on DVD-Video, especially those who have undergone recent restoration processes, is their increased availability to average consumers. Whereas the newly restored version of Metropolis appeared only in limited distribution, on theater screens in select cities, its DVD release covers most geographic regions, especially through Internet distributors such as Amazon.com. This expansion of economic prospects for revivals of classics will surely prompt more companies to finance restoration projects and help secure the continuing legacy of early cinema greats. It may well have a defining impact upon the politics of film preservation in general, particularly concerning foreign films. 30 According to Robert Gitt, a film preservation officer at the UCLA Film and Television Archive, as much as fifty percent of films produced in the US before 1950 have deteriorated to the point that they will never be able to be seen in public again (Phan). And many early European films have fallen victim to the same fate. Perhaps increasing popularity through readily 30 Robert Gitt at the UCLA Film and Television Archive notes that many of the archives grants originate with private foundations and companies who stipulate which film restoration projects should receive their money, thereby shifting the focus of preservation efforts by applying either commercial or specific individual considerations. Gitt argues that a lot of obscure, but interesting films are left to rot away (Phan). Although DVD releases still depend upon financial viability, the extra revenue gained from selling more DVDs in general (in comparison with VHS re-releases of films), may open up expanded possibilities for archives nonetheless.

PAGE 203

194 available and high quality products will translate into more financial viability for restoration projects. Concurrently, although broader availability will bring these films to the attention of more viewers and perhaps wet their appetite to delve more deeply into filmic history than they ordinarily would have, unfortunately, greater market exposure can have a negative impact on the reception of these films as well. With several different versions of the same film available on DVD, viewers may not realize or understand the difference in quality and content with which they are confronted. The relative freedom that distributors have, especially with material that is no longer under stringent copyright protection, can effect films and viewers in both positive and negative ways. The Cabinet of Caligari, Robert Wienes 1920 silent classic, also recently fully restored and digitally enhanced, is available from Kino International (individually packaged and bundled with other German silent films), Gotham Distribution, Elite Entertainment, and Image Entertainment. 31 In addition to recreating the original expressionistic style of the intertitles, Image Entertainment also reproduced the color tinting which appeared in the films original release. Although the overwhelming 31 The Cabinet of Dr. Caligari is another excellent case for the DVD-mediums capacity to enhance vintage film reception. Caligari can be seen in a number of different versions, produced by several distributors. As is the case with Metropolis, Caligari recently became the focus of an elaborate restoration project and became immediately widely available, first on laserdisc and soon thereafter in the more popular DVD-format. Although efforts to return Caligari to its original luster cannot quite compete with the colorful and multifaceted restoration history of Metropolis, the results are impressive nonetheless. In 1996, the American film restaurateur David Shepard, with his company Film Preservation Associates, began working on The Cabinet of Dr. Caligari. (For a more detailed analysis of Shepards version in comparison to the restored European versions see Olaf Brills Caligari auf DVD.) Unlike the European restoration variants of the same film from 1984 (European Film Archive) and 1996 (Project Lumire), the Shepard version hit the mass-market immediately, in 1996 on Laserdisc, and in 1997 on DVD. One of the most appealing additions to this classic films repertoire are the newly developed English intertitles which feature, like their restored German counterparts and based on the original version, an expressionist-style typescript. The intertitles in Shepards version, realized with the help of computer imaging, adhere closely to the style of the original titles, created by Hermann Warm, Walter Reimann, and Walter Rhrig in 1920. However, the computer enhancement as well as the high image quality of the DVD storage medium add to the intertitles impact and affect the film as a whole. Appearing throughout the film in their unrivaled clarity, they add to the overall impressionistic style of the film.

PAGE 204

195 majority of silent films from the early 20 th century originally included the addition of color, they were preserved in black and white because the practice of tinting and toning left the film stock vulnerable to decay over time. 32 Therefore film stock manufacturers of the time recommended to preserve a black and white original of a film before altering the print with color. The inevitable deterioration of tinted and toned originals has led to the demise of many of the colored versions of films (Usai 27). 33 This pre-Technicolor method of physically altering the film stock to achieve color effects imparted on these silent films a distinctness and added dimension which further sets them apart from later films. Losing the color tinting strips meaning from these films which is surely a negative aspect embedded in the legacy of the celluloid medium. The Image Entertainment release of Caligari has tried to return to this lost film art by artificially adding what was originally part of the film. However, on DVD, color cannot prematurely age the film; it will be preserved for the duration of the softwares life and beyond (due to the flawless transfer of code from one digital medium to another). 32 As Paolo Cherchi Usai explains in the Color of Nitrate: Some Factual Observations on Tinting and Toning Manuals for Silent Films, four basic techniques of film coloring preceded the eventual ubiquity of Technicolor: hand coloring, coloring by stencil, tinting, and toning. Hand coloring represents a technique that requires a painter to apply aniline dye directly and free-style onto single frames. Stencil coloring is a more time and cost-effective process whereby a machine automatically applies color to film frames in the shape of the stencil. Tinting involves coloring the entire frame in a single color, and it can be combined with either hand coloring or stencil coloring techniques. Toning a film print required a complete immersion in a chemical solution which affects only the darker areas of an image and leaves the lighter sections unaffected (23-27). The increasing sophistication of physical film stock manipulation inspired companies to offer a variety of types of film, each suited to a particular post-production manipulation. As Usai points out, as early as 1926, the manufacturer Path produced nine different film stocks to filmmakers (26). Coloring of films was taken very seriously by the industry and losing this effect inevitably undermines the art inherent in early films. 33 A similar predicament arose out of the separation of sound from image track in early films. This practice contributed to many original soundtracks getting lost or damaged and a new soundtrack had to be added to many old films.

PAGE 205

196 Appropriation of cinema star appeal, as pertaining to actors and directors, also translates well onto the DVD medium, as recent releases featuring Marlene Dietrich or Louise Brooks, as well as collections based on a specific directors uvre, reveal. The Kino release of The Blue Angel, for instance, includes several bonus features which rely solely on Dietrichs star power. The DVD offers viewers a look at Dietrichs talent and career in addition to and apart from her role in The Blue Angel by including a screen test of the actress, concert footage from two of Dietrichs public performances, and a filmed interview of the star. Likewise, the same companys release of Diary of a Lost Girl includes the complete Windy Riley Goes to Hollywood from 1931 (by Fatty Arbuckle) which has nothing in common with Langs film except they both star Louise Brooks. More recent examples of this marketing approach is a six-DVD compilation named the Herzog/Kinski Collection which cashes in on the prolific film cooperation between the director Werner Herzog and the actor Klaus Kinski. Included in the collection are the feature films Aquirre, The Wrath of God, Woyzeck, Cobra Verde, Nosferatu, Fitzcarraldo, and the documentary My Best Fiend. The Herzog/Kinski Collection obviously capitalizes on and spotlights Klaus Kinskis flamboyant persona; it serves as a retrospective of his career, in light of his recent death, and as a professional record of a man who has earned himself the reputation of being extremely eccentric, an egomaniac, and almost impossible to work with. The included documentary My Best Fiend weaves Kinskis professional as well as personal escapades into a narrative that makes even previously non-interested viewers curious as to how Kinskis temperament translates onto the screen. Similarly, another colorful German actor and director, R. W. Fassbinder, is receiving special attention in a themed release of his films. Wellspring

PAGE 206

197 Media has launched The Rainer Werner Fassbinder Collection, which includes the release of a number on his restored films on DVD. 34 Several DVDs include extras such as documentaries about Fassbinder (Rainer Werner Fassbinder, 1977 The Many Women of Fassbinder and Life, Love and Celluloid), rarely seen shorts (The City Tramp and The Little Chaos) and commentaries from his contemporaries in the business (Wim Wenders). In the future, many more of such actoror director-focused DVDs and collections will probably appear on the market since each new packaging and marketing idea provides the impetus for presenting a new edition and give buyers a reason to purchase and add it to their collection. The special focus editions have a two-fold effect: they generate renewed interest in a star or director, and they provide the viewer with a deeper and better informed appreciation of the films and their artists. This elaborate packaging scheme depends on the DVD-format for its effect. Not only can films be stored on the same physical space as the additional material, making it convenient for viewers to delve more deeply (and peripherally) into the subject contained in the DVD, the interface also displays these features relatively prominently, therefore virtually forcing the viewer to acknowledge the existence of the extras and to recognize that films do not exist in a vacuum, but are subject to the socio-historical context of art and society in which they were created. Setting the Mood: The DVD-Video Interface Unlike the recurring interface on CD-ROM applications, discussed above, the DVD-Video menu only provides initial access to the lengthy feature presentation and 34 The Fassbinder films that are now available on DVD have undergone considerable restoration efforts and digital remastering. The Rainer Werner Fassbinder Foundation has been very influential will focus its attention on restoring and acquiring outstanding rights to Berlin Alexanderplatz. Half a million Euros are needed for the work of restoring the fifteen-and-a-half-hour masterpiece. The foundation hopes to raise part of the money at a benefit event in New York scheduled for the spring of 2004 (Newsletter).

PAGE 207

198 does not require the viewer to repeatedly return to its interface in order to navigate through the main DVD content (since the principal feature, the film, unfolds in a linear fashion and can be manipulated through the remote control [e.g., through fast-forwarding, rewinding, or scene skipping]). Conversely, the CD-ROM menu frequently stays in view throughout the run of the application (or at least an access point to it), whereas the DVD menu only appears at the beginning and, at the viewers request, as a disruption of the main feature; it does not represent an integral part of the presentation, but rather acts as a peripheral feature. The feature films formal make-up, originally conceived to be viewed in a non-interactive setting on a cinema or TV screen, resists interruptions. Therefore, the DVD-Video interface serves as an initial remark on the film presentation but cannot sustain its influence as a persistent and reoccurring element such as is the case with CD-ROM interfaces. The latter are task-oriented constructions, whereas DVD-Video menus are entertainment-based and presentational in nature. Nonetheless, some interface designers have been doing their best to make the most of their creations limited impact on the user or the main feature. 35 DVD versions of previously released material must arouse motivation in viewers to buy films they have already seen or even own on VHS. Along with added features and the increased picture and sound quality, the interface provides the film with a fresh look; it inspires buyers to purchase old material because it appears new. Newly released films on DVD will appear enhanced if the interface is modeled as an interesting access panel to the main feature. The interface gives access not only to the main film and 35 EMA Multimedia is one of the most famous and innovative interface design companies. They not only developed the first motion graphics in a DVD interface, but also offered the first DVD video game and sound-enhanced menu.

PAGE 208

199 the bonus material included on the disc, but it can also supply a mood or look, take an interpretive stance, introduce a narrative frame, or provide a specific rhythm for the main feature. A well-designed interface augments, contradicts, or questions the films original message. On the other hand, an insipid, unimaginative DVD entry point can make the film seem dated or one-dimensional, as if it is not worthy of a grand introduction. The DVD versions of Wim Wenderss Buena Vista Social Club and Werner Herzogs Aguirre, Wrath of God are both excellent examples of how a well-designed interface can comment intelligently upon and enhance the feature attraction. Viewers experience both of these films with an added amount of insight due to their DVD presentation. In both cases, DVD designers have paid attention to the intended content of the DVD for which they have been commissioned to provide a functional access point as well as an aesthetically pleasing and critically rich display. Buena Vista Social Club (1999) a musicumentary, as the director himself calls it, chronicles the triumphant comeback of several elderly Cuban musicians who emerged out of several decades of obscurity to enjoy incredible success, replete with major engagements at New York Citys Carnegie Hall and a concert hall in Amsterdam. Under production notes the DVD proclaims Buena Vista Social Club resonates with a love and admiration for authentic Cuban music. The main interface and all submenus of Wenderss film use an animated background (which loops continuously) that translates Wenderss affection and admiration for his subject into images. Predictably, the design of all of the menus consists of animated musical instruments, a man playing what may be a trumpet, another playing a guitar, a photo of the complete musical ensemble, and several other iconic references to the music which is the subject of the film. The overall look of

PAGE 209

200 the DVD is one that immerses the viewer in the musicians world, their instruments, and their music. However, at the same time, the interface also manages to undermine aurally the very topic it seems to promote visually. While the interface appears on the screen, instead of audio clips from the Cuban musicians songs, the viewer hears the sounds of street noise, presumably the streets of Havana, reproducing the distant hum of traffic with the occasional car horn, as well as the faint cries of children playing and people talking and shouting and birds chirping. Additionally, the cover of the DVD (as well as the VHS sleeve) features, not the band of musicians, but a typical street scene in Havana. This tension created by images and seemingly contradictory sound serves Wenderss project well. It makes the viewer conscious of the fact that Buena Vista Social Club is not only a musicumentary, but also a film about present day Cuba, its inhabitants, its socio-historical situation, and the culture emerging from this context. Even without consulting the production notes (which are not prominently featured), where it is explained that Buena Vista Social Club documents a musical love affair with Cubas culture, history, and songs. Here music describes a homelanda place of contrasts, where songs often highlight political and social realities, the viewer is aware of this contrast through the interface alone. Interface designers have not only created an attractive look for Buena Vistas DVD release but have also understood the films content and reflected this sensitivity in their design scheme. Aguirre, Wrath of God is another DVD which uses the interface to its fullest potential. In the film, Herzog documents the trek of the sixteenth-century conquistador Aquirre and his soldiers through the Amazon jungle in Brazil in their greedy quest for

PAGE 210

201 gold. For much of the film, the camera focuses on the Spanish conquistadors and their detached interaction with their environment, attempting to subjugate the land and its people but at the same time trying to remain untainted by the wildness that surrounds them. The jungle stays mysterious and dangerous, and its essence prevails as unconquerable by camera and characters. This problematic interaction between landscape and characters in the film is mirrored perfectly in the interface. The main menu shows Aquirre in his armor superimposed over an animated background featuring the Amazonian river and jungle which both play important parts in the films narrative. While the nature background is alive with sounds and motion, in an actual video clip loop, the foregrounded Aguirre appears as a static image, ostensibly a photograph, unwilling to interact with the jungle Other. However, the two layers are not completely separated, although Aguirres image is fixed, his blond hair, failing to stay contained by his steel helmet, moves ever so slightly in the wind which obviously belongs to the background scene, thus foreshadowing Aguirres eventual demise through the jungles assertion of its natural power over man (Western or not). The interfaces of both of these films are, as was the case with Exports Bilder, examples of mise-en-abyme constructions, a mini narrative that encapsulates or somehow reflects the larger structures within which it is held: it is a mirroring of the text by the subtext (Lunenfeld 54). What the film portrays in images and narrative, the interface re-enacts in miniature form. Conclusion: What are Film and Cinema? Towards an Expanded Definition Films have appeared in various storage formats and have been transmitted to the public via diverse distribution systems over the last century and a half. Until recently, however, films, by definition, have been conceived as images recorded by film cameras

PAGE 211

202 onto film stock which, after going through a developing process, are projected onto a large screen to be viewed by a paying public in a dark auditorium (in relative silence). Even though videos, television, and laserdiscs changed the conditions for viewing, they were usually seen as inferior copies of the original, i.e., to experience the films full effect, with its original image and sound quality intact, one must view it in a cinema. The CD-ROM, the DVD-Video, digital film production and the Internet have changed this perception to some degree (although there still exists the aura of experiencing celluloid in the theater for many cineastes) and reshaped the very definition of what constitutes a film. These digital media have altered the films original form, its cinematic reception and its institutional make-up. In The Language of New Media Lev Manovich agrees with the statement that new medias influence on film redefines the identity of film as such. Film (except for the experimental type) was once a medium dependent solely on images captured by lens-based technology. Cinema, he states [he makes no clear distinction between the terms film and cinema] is the art of the index; it is an attempt to make art out of a footprint. In the age of new media, however, films indexical identity can now be simulated or discarded completely through employing computer technology. Manual construction of images in digital cinema, Manovich continues represents a return to the precinematic practices of the nineteenth century, when images were hand-painted and hand-animated. The twentieth century delegate[d] these manual techniques to animation, so that cinema could define itself as a recording medium (295). For Manovich, digital technology retro-defines cinema as a medium akin to another (older) artistic genre altogether, the art of painting. In this line of argument film is not changed into something new and singular

PAGE 212

203 by the digital but can be approached and compared to historical trajectories of other media genre. While I share Manovichs conviction that new media cannot be equated with media unique to the present, but that all visual media is dependent on prior and later historical trajectories and developments in representational technologies, in this section I have attempted to illustrate that in addition to looking at new medias impact on film content from within the medium itself (as Manovich does), it is also productive to investigate films changing storage and distribution channels in order to trace its effect on film content to arrive at a new definition. I propose to append Manovichs definition, not replace it:2 Storage and distribution mechanisms have had an important impact on films identity as a medium, because they have (at least in the case of the digital media) added an element that was originally thought to be alien to the mediums nature. I suggest defining film and cinema in combination with digital storage technologies as a medium with new objectives and an institution with changed priorities, respectively. In other words, storage media, such as CD-ROM and DVD-ROM not only affect the delivery and containment of films but actually expand what belongs to the category of film. Films on DVDs, for example, begin to exert their meaning through the interface, the marketing, and the supplemental materials, before the first scene of the main feature appears on the screen. A film, such as Syntagma, presented on CD-ROM, is a different film from the one that was originally shown in theaters or distributed on video. Film and cinema are still, to some degree, definable under familiar rubrics, because they continue to exist in traditional storage and distribution forms, but their definition must be expanded when

PAGE 213

204 they are subjected to alternate types of presentation, appear in a different context, and are received by viewers via CD-ROM, the DVD-Video, or the Internet.

PAGE 214

LIST OF REFERENCES About Paper Tiger. Paper Tiger Television. 11 November 2002. . Adorno, Theodor. Aesthetic Theory. Trans. Robert Hullot-Kentor. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1997. Alberro, Alexander. Valie Export. Artforum April 2000. 15 January 2002 . Allen, Michael. The Impact of Digital Technologies on Film Aesthetics. The New Media Book. Ed. Dan Harries. London: British Film Institute, 2002. Alter, Nora. Imaging (Post)Gender under Transnational Capital: Valie Exports Perfect Pair. After Postmodernism. Austrian Literature and Film in Transition. Ed. Willy Riemer. Riverside, CA: Ariadne Press, 1999. ---. Projecting History: German Nonfiction Cinema, 1967-2000. Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Press, 2002. Andreotti, Libero and Xavier Costa, ed. Theory of the Drive and Other Situationist Writings. Barcelona: Muse DArt Contemporani, 1996. Arbeitsgemeinschaft Kino. Fr eine kulturelle Frderung des Kinos! Neue Medien contra Filmkultur? Ed. Arbeitsgemeinschaft der Filmjournalisten Hamburger Filmbro. Berlin: Wissenschaftsverlag Volker Spiess GmbH, Berlin, 1987. 63-73. Baier, Martin. Film, Video und HDTV: Die Audiovisionen des Wim Wenders. Berlin: Kohler Verlag, 1996. Barthes, Roland. Image Music Text. Trans. Stephen Heath. New York: Hill and Wang, 1977. ---. Introduction to the Structural Analysis of Narratives. A Barthes Reader. Ed. Susan Sontag. New York: Hill and Wang, 1982. 251-95. Beckett, Samuel. Krapps Last Tape. The Bedford Introduction to Literature. Michael Meyer. 5 th ed. Boston: Bedford St. Martins, 1999. 1649-55. Belton, John. Digital Cinema: A False Revolution. October 100 (Spring 2002): 98-114. 205

PAGE 215

206 Benjamin, Walter. The Author as Producer. The Essential Frankfurt School Reader. Ed. Andrew Arato and Eike Gebhart. New York: Continuum, 1994. 254-26. ---. The Work of Art in the Age of Technical Reproduction. Illuminations. Walter Benjamin. Essays and Reflections. Ed. Hannah Arendt. New York: Schocken Books, 1968. 217-52. Bogard, William. The Simulation of Surveillance. Hypercontrol in Telematic Societies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996. Bolter, Jay David and Richard Grusin. Remediation. Understanding New Media. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press, 2000. Bordwell, David. Intensified Continuity: Aspects of Visual Style in Contemporary Hollywood Film. Midwestern Conference on Film, Language, and Literature. Northern Illinois University, DeKalb. 23 March 2001. Brante, Alexander. Virtuelle Welten. Kursbuch Neue Medien 2000. Ed. Heide Baumann and Clemens Schwender. Stuttgart and Mnchen: Deutsche Verlags-Anstalt, 2000. 44-55 Brayton, Jennifer. Cyberfeminism as New Theory. 20 January 2003 . Brecht, Bertholt. Brecht on Theatre. Trans. John Willett. New York: Hill and Wang, 1966. ---. Gesammelte Werke 16 Schriften zum Theater 2. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, 1967. Brill, Olaf. Caligari auf DVD. epd Film 18. 2 (Feb 2001): 10. Bukatman, Scott. X-Bodies. Uncontrollable Bodies: Testimonies of Identity and Culture. Ed. Rodney Sappington and Tyler Stallings. Seattle: Bay Press, 1994. 92-129. Brger, Peter. Theory of the Avant-Garde. Trans. Michael Shaw. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1984. Bundschuh, Hans Jrg. Die Produktion von Spielfilmen mit Video. Neue Medien contra Filmkultur? Ed. Arbeitsgemeinschaft der Filmjournalisten Hamburger Filmbro. Berlin: Wissenschaftsverlag Volker Spiess GmbH, Berlin, 1987.203-211. Burnham, David. The Rise of the Computer State. New York: Vintage, 1983. Campbell, Duncan. Interception Capabilities 2000. Edinburgh. April 1999. 5 March 2003 .

PAGE 216

207 Cassell, Justine and Henry Jenkins, ed. From Barbie to Mortal Kombat. Gender and Computer Games. Cambridge, MA and London: The MIT Press, 1998. Corner, John. Critical Ideas in Television Studies. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1999. Corrigan, Timothy. A Cinema without Walls. Movies and Culture after Vietnam. New Brunswick, N.J.: Rutgers University Press, 1991. Dandecker, Christopher. Surveillance, Power, and Modernity: Bureaucracy and Discipline from 1700 to the Present Day. New York: St. Martins Press, 1990. Debord, Guy. Theory of the Derive. Theory of the Drive and Other Situationist Writings. Ed. Andreotti, Libero and Xavier Costa. Barcelona: Muse DArt Contemporani, 1996. 22-27. Eifler, Margaret. Valie Exports Invisible Adversaries. Film as Text. Gender and German Cinema. Vol. 1. Oxford: Berg Publishers, 1993. 241-54. Elliot, Chris. The Legality of the Interception of Electronic Communications: A Concise Survey of the Principal Legal Issues and Instruments under International, European and National Law. October 1999. February 2003 . Ellis, John. Broadcast TV Narration. Visible Fictions. London and New York: Routledge, 1982. Elsaesser, Thomas. Cinema Futures: Convergence, Divergence, Difference. Cinema Futures: Cain, Abel or Cable? The Screen Arts in the Digital Age. Ed. Thomas Elsaesser and Kay Hoffmann. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press, 1998. 9-26. ---. Digital Cinema: Delivery, Event, Time. Cinema Futures: Cain, Abel or Cable? The Screen Arts in the Digital Age. Ed. Thomas Elsaesser and Kay Hoffmann. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press, 1998. 201-222. ---. Louis Lumirethe Cinemas First Virtualist? Cinema Futures: Cain, Abel or Cable? The Screen Arts in the Digital Age. Ed. Thomas Elsaesser and Kay Hoffmann. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press, 1998. 45-61. E-Motion Bytes. Internationale Hofer Filmtage. October 2001. 5 February 2002 . Entertainment Industry to Spend $3 Billion by 2005 to Convert 21,000 Theaters to Digital. 30 May 2000. 24 August 2002 .

PAGE 217

208 Enzensberger, Hans Magnus. The Aporias of the Avant-Garde. The Consciousness Industry. On Literature, Politics and the Media. New York: Continuum, 1974. 17-41. ---. Constituents of a Theory of the Media. Electronic Culture. Technology and Visual Representation. Ed. Timothy Druckrey. New York: Aperture Foundation, 1996. 62-86. ---. The Industrialisation of the Mind. The Consciousness Industry. On Literature, Politics and the Media. New York: Continuum, 1974. 5-15. ---. Das Nullmedium oder Warum alle Klagen ber das Fernsehen gegenstandslos sind. Baukasten zu einer Theorie der Medium. Kritische Diskurse zur Pressefreiheit. Ed. Peter Glotz. Mnchen: Verlag Reinhard Fischer, 1997. 145-57. Excerpts from Interviews with Wenders. The Cinema of Wim Wenders. Image, Narrative, and the Postmodern Condition. Ed. Roger F. Cook and Gerd Gemnden. Detroit: Wayne State University Press, 1997. 60-86. Export, Valie. Bilder der Berhrungen. CD-ROM. Kln: Verlag der Buchhandlung Walther Knig, 1998. ---. Interview with Valie Export. Eifler, Margaret and Sandra Frieden. Gender and German Cinema. Vol. 1. Oxford: Berg Publishers, 1993. 267-78. Faber, Monika. Leap of Space. Time-Poem. Movement-Trace. Split:Reality Valie Export. Ed. Museum moderner Kunst Stiftung Ludwig Wien. Wien and New York: Springer, 1997. 208-213. Fanagan, Mary. Mobile Identities, Digital Stars, and Post-Cinematic Selves. Wide Angle: Issue on Digitality and the Memory of Cinema 21.3 (1999): 3-20. Fiske, John. Television Culture. London and New York: Routledge,1989. Flaherty, Joseph A. Formats & DTV standards part I: the HDTV common image format. World Broadcast Engineering. 23.2 (Feb. 2000): 18-203. Flinn, Caryl. That Music that Lola Ran To. Sound Matters. Essays on the Acoustics of German Culture. Ed. Nora Alter and Lutz Koepnick, forthcoming. Forum. Wim Wenders The Official Website. 30 January 2001 . Foucault, Michel. The Birth of the Clinic. An Archaeology of Medical Perception. New York: Vintage, 1994. ---. Discipline and Punish. The Birth of the Prison. New York: Vintage, 1995.

PAGE 218

209 Friedberg, Anne. CD and DVD. The New Media Book. Ed. Dan Harries. London: BFI Publishing, 2002. 30-39. Friedlander, Larry. Spaces of Experience on Designing Multimedia Applications. Contextual Media Multimedia and Interpretation. Ed. Edward Barrett and Marie Redmond. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press, 1995. 163-74. Goertz, Heinrich. Piscator. Reinbeck bei Hamburg: Rowohlt Taschenbuch Verlag GmbH, 1974. Goldman, Robert and Stephen Papson. Sign Wars: The Cluttered Landscape of Advertising. New York and London: The Guilford Press, 1996. Grob, Norbert. Aufzeichnungen zu Kleidern und Stdten. Wenders. Ed. Norbert Grob and Antje Goldau. Berlin: Wissenschaftsverlag Volker Spiess GmbH, 1991. Habermas, Jrgen. The Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere. Trans. Thomas Brger and Frederick Lawrence. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press, 1991. Hall, Peter Christian. Erlebnisangebot vs. Restzeitverwertung. Neue Medien contra Filmkultur? Ed. Arbeitsgemeinschaft der Filmjournalisten Hamburger Filmbro. Berlin: Wissenschaftsverlag Volker Spiess GmbH, Berlin, 1987.167-178. Hall, Stuart. Encoding and Decoding in the Television Discourse. 1973. The Cultural Studies Reader. Ed. Simon During. London and New York: Routledge, 1993. 90-103. Haraway, Donna. Simians, Cyborgs, and Women. The Reinvention of Nature. New York: Routledge, 1991. Harvey, David. The Condition of Postmodernity. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell Publishers, 1990. Hayles, N. Katherine. How We Became Posthuman. Virtual Bodies in Cybernetics, Literature, and Informatics. Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press, 1999. ---. Virtual Bodies and Flickering Signifiers. Electronic Culture. Technology and Visual Representation. Ed. Timothy Druckrey. New York: Aperture Foundation, 1996. 259-77. Himmel, Erde und Reibekuchen. Der Spiegel 26/2001. 25 June 2002 . History of Computing. Department of Computer Science, Virginia Tech. 15 June 2002 < http://ei.cs.vt.edu/~history/Zuse.html>.

PAGE 219

210 Hollevoet, Christel. Wandering in the City Flnerie to Drive and After: The Cognitive Mapping of Urban Space. The Power of the City: The City of Power. New York: Whitney Museum of Art, 1992. 25-55. Hollows, Joanne. Mass Culture Theory and Political Economy. Approaches to Popular Film. Ed. Joanne Hollows and Mark Jancovich. Manchester and New York: Manchester University Press, 1995. 15-36. Hollows, Joanne and Mark Jancovich. Introduction: Popular Film and Cultural Distinctions. Approaches to Popular Film. Ed. Joanne Hollows and Mark Jancovich. Manchester and New York: Manchester University Press, 1995. 1-14. Horkheimer, Max and Theodor Adorno. The Culture Industry. Enlightenment as Mass Deception. Dialectic of Enlightenment. Trans. John Cumming. New York: Continuum, 1996. 120-67. Howard, Robert. Brave New Workplace. New York: Viking, 1985. Huffman, Kathy Rae. Video Art: Whats TV Got to Do with It? Illuminating History. An Essential Guide to Video Art. New York: Aperture Foundation, 1990. 81-90. Iles, Chrissie. Valie Export: Body, Space, Splitting, Projection. Ob/De + Con(Struction). Philadelphia, Pennsylvania: Moore College of Art and Design, 2000, 35-40. Jameson, Frederic. The Cultural Turn. Selected Writings on the Postmodern, 1983-1998. London and New York: Verso, 1998. ---. Postmodernism or, The Cultural Logic of Late Capitalism. Durham: Duke University Press, 1997. Kittler, Friedrich. There is No Software. Electronic Culture. Technology and Visual Representation. Ed. Timothy Druckrey. New York: Aperture Foundation, 1996. 331-37. Klawans, Stuart. Born Cool. The Nation 12 July 1999: 34-6. Kluge, Alexander. Die Fernsehmagazine. May 2002 . The Konrad Zuse Freundeskreis Homepage. 15 June 2003 . Konrad Zuse Internet Archive. 15 June 2002 . Kraus, Rosalind E. The Originality of the Avant-Garde. The Originality of the Avant-Garde and Other Modernist Myths. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press. 151-70.

PAGE 220

211 Kreimeier, Klaus. The Ufa Story. A History of Germanys Greatest Film Company, 1918-1945. Trans. Robert and Rita Kimber. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1999. Krochmal, Mo. Digital Download Spec Is on Time. TechWeb 18 June 1999. 31 July 2002 . Landow, George P. Hypertext 2.0. The Convergence of Contemporary Critical Theory and Technology. Baltimore and London: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1997. Lara Croft: The Art of Virtual Seduction. Roseville, CA: Prima Publishing, 2000. Light Andrew. Wim Wenders and the Everyday Aesthetics of Technology and Space. The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 55:2, (Spring 1997): 215-29. Lukcs, Georg. Es geht um den Realismus. Marxismus und Literatur. Eine Dokumentation. Vol. II. Ed. F.J. Raddatz. Reinbeck bei Hamburg, 1969. Lunenfeld, Peter. Snap to Grid. A Users Guide to Digital Arts, Media, and Cultures. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press, 2000. Lyon, David. The Electronic Eye: The Rise of Surveillance Society. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1994. MacCabe, Colin. Realism and the Cinema: Notes on Some Brechtian Theses. Tracking the Signifier. Theoretical Essays: Film, Linguistics, Literature, 1985. 33-57. Manovich, Lev. The Language of New Media. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press, 2002. Marlow, Eugene, and Eugene Secunda. Shifting Time and Space: The Story of Videotape. New York: Praeger, 1991. McLuhan, Marshall. Understanding Media. The Extensions of Man. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press, 1994. Metz, Christian. Film Language. Transl. Michael Taylor. New York: Oxford University Press, 1974. Mueller, Roswitha. Bertolt Brecht and the Theory of Media. Lincoln, Nebraska and London: University of Nebraska Press, 1989. ---. Valie Export: Fragments of the Imagination. Bloomington and Indianapolis: Indiana University Press, 1994. Murphy, Dean E. As Security Cameras Sprout, Someones Always Watching. New York Times 29 September 2002. 30 September 2002 .

PAGE 221

212 Negt, Oskar and Alexander Kluge. Public Sphere and Experience. Toward an Analysis of the Bourgeois and Proletarian Public Sphere. Trans. Peter Labanyi, Jamie Owen Daniel, and Assenka Oksiloff. Minneapolis and London: University of Minnesota Press, 1993. Newsletter. The Rainer Werner Fassbinder Foundation. November 2002. 15 January 2003 . Nichols, Bill. The Work of Culture in the Age of Cybernetic Systems. Electronic Culture. Technology and Visual Representation. Ed. Timothy Druckrey. New York: Aperture Foundation, 1996. 121-44. Nideffer, Robert. Tomb Raider I and II Patches. 20 February 2001 http://www.kiasma.fi/outoaly/mutation.fem/ (patch also available at ). Nock, Steven. The Costs of Privacy: Surveillance and Reputation in America. New York: A. De Gruyter, 1993. O'Sicky, Ingeborg Majer. Whatever Lola Wants, Lola Gets (Or Does She?): Time and Desire in Tom Tykwer's Run Lola Run. Quarterly Review of Film and Video 19.2 (2002): 123-31. Peters, Jean-Jacques. A History of Television. European Broadcasting Union. 6 February 2000. 10 April 2002 . Phan, Aimee. A Piece of History. 2 June 1997. 18 September 2002 . Poole, Steven. Trigger Happy: Videogames and the Entertainment Revolution. New York: Arcade Publishing. Redman, Nick. Dogs, Documentaries and DVDs. An Interview with Nick Redman. 6 February 2003 . Rees, A. L. A History of Experimental Film and Video. Bloomington: Indiana University Press. 1999. Reitz, Edgar. Speed Is the Mother of Cinema. Cinema Futures: Cain, Abel or Cable? The Screen Arts in the Digital Age. Ed. Thomas Elsaesser and Kay Hoffmann. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press, 1998. 63-71. Rich, Ruby. Mexico at the Multiplex. The Nation 14 May 2001: 34-36. Richter, Robert. Little Or No Chance. Swiss Film Center Newsletter. Spring 2000. Page 10. 14 May 2001 < http://www.swissfilms.ch/download/sfz_2000.pdf >

PAGE 222

213 Rtzer, Florian. Between Nodes and Data Packets. Electronic Culture: Technology and Visual Representation. Ed. Timothy Druckrey. New York: Aperture Foundation, 1996. 246-257 ---. Digitale Weltentwrfe. Streifzge durch die Netzkultur. Mnchen and Wien: Carl Hanser Verlag, 1998. Rosler, Martha. Video: Shedding the Utopian Moment. Illuminating History. An Essential Guide to Video Art. New York: Aperture Foundation, 1990. 31-50. Roth, Wilhelm. Video alternative. Neue Medien contra Filmkultur? Ed. Arbeitsgemeinschaft der Filmjournalisten Hamburger Filmbro. Berlin: Wissenschaftsverlag Volker Spiess GmbH, Berlin, 1987. 212-221. Rule, James. Private Lives. Public Surveillance. London: Allen-Lane, 1973. Rush, Michael. Body Image. Art in America April 2000. 15 January 2002 . Sarris, Andrew. Notes on the Auteur Theory in 1962. Film Theory and Criticism. Ed. Gerald Mast, Marshall Cohen and Leo Braudy. 4 th Edition. New York and Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1992. 585-88. Schmitt, Hans Jrgen. Die Expressionismusdebatte. Materialien zu einer marxistischen Realismuskonzeption. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp. 1976. Schroeder, Joerg. Die erfolgreichsten Filme 1998 Deutschland. Christoph Prevezanos Online. 10 January 2001 . Schulte, Christian and Winfried Siebers, ed. Kluges Fernsehen. Alexander Kluges Kulturmagazine. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp Verlag, 2002. Silverman, Kaja. Speak, body. Split:Reality Valie Export. Ed. Museum moderner Kunst Stiftung Ludwig Wien. Wien and New York: Springer, 1997. 214-223. Sbrahmanyam, Kaveri and Patricia M. Greenfield. Computer Games for Girls: What Makes them Play? From Barbie to Mortal Kombat: Gender and Computer Games. Ed. Justine Cassell and Henry Jenkins. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press, 1998. 46-71. Searleman, Eric. Wondering about Wonder Woman?. The Detroit News 6 January 2001. 1 June 2001 . Smith, Greg M. Introduction. A Few Words about Interactivity. On a Silver Platter. CD-ROMs and the Promise of a New Technology. New York and London: New York University Press, 1999. 1-34.

PAGE 223

214 Sturken, Marita. Paradox in the Evolution of an Art Form: Great Expectations and the Making of a History. Illuminating History. An Essential Guide to Video Art. New York: Aperture Foundation, 1990. 101-121. Talin. Real Interactivity in Interactive Entertainment. ACM SIGGRAPH Computer Graphics 28:2 (May 1994): 97-99. Tomb Raider. CD-ROM. Platinum Edition. San Francisco: Eidos Interactive, 2000. Turkle, Sherry. Construction and Reconstructions of the Self in Virtual Reality. Electronic Culture: Technology and Visual Representation. Ed. Timothy Druckrey. New York: Aperture Foundation, 1996. 354-365. ---. Life on the Screen: Identity in the Age of the Internet. New York: Simon & Schuster, 1995. ---. Psychoanalytic Politics: Jacques Lacan and Freuds French Revolution. New York: The Guildford Press, 1992. Tykwer, Tom. Anything Runs. Interview with Tom Tykwer. Votivkino. 5 January 2001 . Uecker, Matthias. Alexander Kluge: Anti-Fernsehen? Alexander Kluges Fernsehproduktion. Marburg: Schren Verlag, 2000. Ulmer, Gregory. Grammatology Hypermedia. Postmodern Culture 1.2 (1991). January 2002 . ---. Teletheory: Grammatology in the Age of Video. New York: Routledge, 1989. Usai, Paolo Cherchi. The Color of Nitrate: Some Factual Observations on Tinting and Toning Manuals for Silent Films. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press, 1996. 21-30. Virilio, Paul. Die Eroberung des Krpers. Vom bermenschen zum beerreizten Menschen. Frankfurt am Main: Fischer-Tb.-Vlg., 1996. ---. Interview with Louise K. Wilson. Cyberwar, God and Television: Interview with Paul Virilio. Electronic Culture: Technology and Visual Representation. Ed. Timothy Druckrey. New York: Aperture Foundation, 1996. 320-329. The Visions of Wenders. Time International 11 May 1992: 58-59. West, Janet Ann. Creative Talent Creates World-Wide Business. April 2001. 15 November 2002 . Wenders, Wim. The Act of Seeing Essays and Conversations. Trans. Michael Hofmann. London and Boston: Faber and Faber, 1992.

PAGE 224

215 ---. On Film Essays and Conversations. London and Boston: Faber and Faber, 2001. Williams, Raymond. Television: Technology and Cultural Form. 1974. Hanover, NH: Wesleyan University Press, 1993. Wim Wenders Bio. Wim Wenders The Official Website. 21 February 2002 . Wolken am deutschen Kinohimmel. Informationsdienst des Instituts der deutschen Wirtschaft Kln. Ausgabe 49, 9 December 1999. 15 May 2001 . Wollen, Peter. The Auteur Theory. Film Theory and Criticism. Ed. Gerald Mast, Marshall Cohen and Leo Braudy. 4 th Edition. New York and Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1992. 589-605. ---. Godard and Counter Cinema: Vent dEst. Film Theory and Criticism. Ed. Leo Braudy and Marshall Cohen. 5 th ed. New York: Oxford University Press, 1999. 499-507. Woody, Todd. The Race to Kill Kazaa. Wired Magazine 11.02 (February 2003). February 2003 . Ziegenhagen, Stefan P. Filmvertrieb vernetzt. Kursbuch Neue Medien 2000. Ed. Heide Baumann and Clemens Schwender. Stuttgart and Mnchen: Deutsche Verlags-Anstalt, 2000. 44-55. Zielinski, Siegfried. Fin de Sicle of Television Cinema Futures: Cain, Abel or Cable? The Screen Arts in the Digital Age. Ed. Thomas Elsaesser and Kay Hoffmann. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press, 1998. 73-83.

PAGE 225

BIOGRAPHICAL SKETCH Margit Grieb is a Ph.D. candidate in the Department of Germanic and Slavic Studies at the University of Florida. She completed her B.A. in German at Stetson University (magna cum laude) and her M.A. in German studies at the University of Florida. She also earned a Graduate Certificate in womens and gender studies at the University of Florida. While at UF, Margit Grieb received the Gibson Dissertation Fellowship, the Grinter Fellowship, the Center for the Humanities Fellowship, the Ruth O. McQuown Scholarship, and the Calvin A. VanderWerf Teaching Award. She recently published an article on the intersections of film and videogames, Run Lara Run, in Screenplay: Cinema/Videogames/Interfaces (Wallflower Press, 2002) and has presented papers at various conferences on Wim Wenderss feature films, Valie Exports multimedia projects, popular German film, Brechts Epic Theater, and the Internet as a medium for foreign language teaching. 208


Permanent Link: http://ufdc.ufl.edu/UFE0000690/00001

Material Information

Title: Transformations of the (silver) screen : film after new media
Physical Description: Mixed Material
Language: English
Creator: Grieb, Margit ( Dissertant )
Alter, Nora M. ( Thesis advisor )
Bullivant, Keith ( Reviewer )
Futterknecht, Franz ( Reviewer )
Ulmer, Gregory ( Reviewer )
Publisher: University of Florida
Place of Publication: Gainesville, Fla.
Publication Date: 2003
Copyright Date: 2003

Subjects

Subjects / Keywords: Germanic and Slavic Studies thesis,Ph.D
Dissertations, Academic -- UF -- Germanic and Slavic Studies

Notes

Abstract: Transformations of the (Silver) Screen: Film After New Media focuses on German cinema and new media productions. Within each of the chapters I examine emerging technologies such as video, digital video, HDTV, videogames, and new technologies of distribution and storage, e.g., Internet, satellite-streaming, CD-ROM, and DVD-Video, and explore their impact on films and filmmakers, including Wim Wenders, Tim Tykwer, and Valie Export. Using Bertolt Brecht's theories of implementing new media technoogies (i.e., film and radio) in his epic theater as a point of departure, I look at how the aesthetic representation of emerging media, embedded within the "older" representational system of film, is employed to enhance and expand the latter's capabilities ofr artistic expression. One of the questions I attempt to answer is: How can Brecht's epic practice be adapted succussfully to the study and employment of new media in art? I also address the relationship between gender and technology, in particular with media that traditionally have been codified as male. I am particularly interested in how artiste re-invent and re-define the form and content of the conventional medium of film and its institutional apparatus, the cinema, through the use of a technical innovation. My arguments throughout the dissertation engage with the work of film, media, culture, and feminist critics of the 20th century, including, among others, Theodor W. Adorno, Walter Benjamin, Jay David Boler, Bertolt BRecht, Hans Magnus Enzensberger, Valie Export, Richard Grusin, Donna Haraway, Katherine Hayles, Friedrich Kittler, Peter Lunenfeld, Roswitha Mueller, Marita Sturken, Sherry Turkle, Gregory Ulmer, and Wim Wenders.
Subject: Brecht, cinema, DVD, epic, film, German, HDTV, media, new, theater, video, videogames
General Note: Title from title page of source document.
General Note: Includes vita.
Thesis: Thesis (Ph. D.)--University of Florida, 2003.
Bibliography: Includes bibliographical references.
General Note: Text (Electronic thesis) in PDF format.
General Note: Document formatted into ix, 216 pages.

Record Information

Source Institution: University of Florida
Holding Location: University of Florida
Rights Management: All rights reserved by the source institution and holding location.
System ID: UFE0000690:00001

Permanent Link: http://ufdc.ufl.edu/UFE0000690/00001

Material Information

Title: Transformations of the (silver) screen : film after new media
Physical Description: Mixed Material
Language: English
Creator: Grieb, Margit ( Dissertant )
Alter, Nora M. ( Thesis advisor )
Bullivant, Keith ( Reviewer )
Futterknecht, Franz ( Reviewer )
Ulmer, Gregory ( Reviewer )
Publisher: University of Florida
Place of Publication: Gainesville, Fla.
Publication Date: 2003
Copyright Date: 2003

Subjects

Subjects / Keywords: Germanic and Slavic Studies thesis,Ph.D
Dissertations, Academic -- UF -- Germanic and Slavic Studies

Notes

Abstract: Transformations of the (Silver) Screen: Film After New Media focuses on German cinema and new media productions. Within each of the chapters I examine emerging technologies such as video, digital video, HDTV, videogames, and new technologies of distribution and storage, e.g., Internet, satellite-streaming, CD-ROM, and DVD-Video, and explore their impact on films and filmmakers, including Wim Wenders, Tim Tykwer, and Valie Export. Using Bertolt Brecht's theories of implementing new media technoogies (i.e., film and radio) in his epic theater as a point of departure, I look at how the aesthetic representation of emerging media, embedded within the "older" representational system of film, is employed to enhance and expand the latter's capabilities ofr artistic expression. One of the questions I attempt to answer is: How can Brecht's epic practice be adapted succussfully to the study and employment of new media in art? I also address the relationship between gender and technology, in particular with media that traditionally have been codified as male. I am particularly interested in how artiste re-invent and re-define the form and content of the conventional medium of film and its institutional apparatus, the cinema, through the use of a technical innovation. My arguments throughout the dissertation engage with the work of film, media, culture, and feminist critics of the 20th century, including, among others, Theodor W. Adorno, Walter Benjamin, Jay David Boler, Bertolt BRecht, Hans Magnus Enzensberger, Valie Export, Richard Grusin, Donna Haraway, Katherine Hayles, Friedrich Kittler, Peter Lunenfeld, Roswitha Mueller, Marita Sturken, Sherry Turkle, Gregory Ulmer, and Wim Wenders.
Subject: Brecht, cinema, DVD, epic, film, German, HDTV, media, new, theater, video, videogames
General Note: Title from title page of source document.
General Note: Includes vita.
Thesis: Thesis (Ph. D.)--University of Florida, 2003.
Bibliography: Includes bibliographical references.
General Note: Text (Electronic thesis) in PDF format.
General Note: Document formatted into ix, 216 pages.

Record Information

Source Institution: University of Florida
Holding Location: University of Florida
Rights Management: All rights reserved by the source institution and holding location.
System ID: UFE0000690:00001


This item has the following downloads:


Full Text












TRANSFORMATIONS OF THE (SILVER) SCREEN: FILM AFTER NEW MEDIA


By

MARGIT GRIEB













A DISSERTATION PRESENTED TO THE GRADUATE SCHOOL
OF THE UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT
OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF
DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY

UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA


2003

































Copyright 2003

by

Margit Grieb



































For Don















ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

First and foremost, I would like to thank my dissertation committee chair, Prof

Nora M. Alter, for providing me with many invaluable years of mentoring and diligent

assistance and guidance in every stage of this dissertation. It was her remarkable

scholarly expertise that guided my first steps into academic research and her

encouragement and knowledge that helped me continue with my studies. I also thank the

other members of my committee, Prof Keith Bullivant, Prof Franz Futterknecht, and

Prof Gregory Ulmer, for their valuable comments and suggestions. A special note of

thanks goes to Prof. Ulmer for sharing with me his creative and insightful perspective on

issues concerning new media. I am also grateful to the Department of Germanic and

Slavic Studies for providing me with many years of financial and intellectual support. I

owe special gratitude to the members of the departmental office staff, Sophia Kurzweg

and Annemarie Sykes, who have contributed in many ways to making my life as a

graduate student more bearable. Many thanks go also to my friends Yves Clemmen and

Will Lehman for patiently listening to my ideas and providing constructive criticism.

Most of all, I am grateful to Don Wilder, without whom I never may have

developed the interest in technology which served as the foundation for this project. Most

importantly, his patience, encouragement, and unwavering support have been a

constant source of energy and inspiration for me over the years. I also thank Arielle for

being my friend and making me smile when I most needed it. Final thanks go to Louis,









Oso, Kodi, and Charlie, whose companionship kept me focused on what is important in
















TABLE OF CONTENTS
page

A C K N O W L E D G M E N T S ................................................................................................. iv

A B STR A C T ............................................................................... ..................... viii

CHAPTER

1 IN TR OD U CTION ............................................... .. ......................... ..

D efin itio n s ....................................................... 1
O u tlin e ............................................................................ . 6
Focus ...................................................... ........ .......................7

2 NEW MEDIA IN THEORY AND PRACTICE..................... ................13

The Experim ent of Epic Theater...................................................... ... ............ 13
The E pic Theater Stage .............................................. ............................. 17
The Lehrstick and ,///i i // k M eet Technology .............................................20
B building on B recht............................................................... ... ... ....23
Interaction, Participation, and Veigi/igei............. ................... ....................23
H yperm edition ............. .. ................ .... .. ................... ... ........... .......... ..... 34
Brechtian Theory and Recent Developments in the Public Sphere....................47
Conclusion: Brecht after Brecht-Continuations and Transgressions.....................51

3 V ID E O A N D F IL M ............................................................. .................................56

The Emergence and Development of Video as an Artistic Medium..........................56
V ideo and T elevision........... ..... ........................................ .......... ............. 56
HDTV .............................................. .. ......... .. ...... .......... 66
Wim Wenders: Rebel without a Clear Cause? ................................ .....................69
The Superiority of the Filmic Image over Other Recordings...........................72
W enders as D igital G uru ................................ ............. ............... ....79
Until the End of the World or How to Split HD from TV..............................81
Video Recording as an Act of Violence: Wenders on Surveillance ..................90
Video, TV, the Artist/Author and the Auteur: Film as Craft/Handwerk............98
Conclusion: Technology and the Difficulty of Representing History/Memory .......109
A abandoning G erm an-ness .................. ............................ ............... .... 109
Recording the Past and Future on Video and Film ................. ... .................112

4 COMPUTER GAMES AND FILM .............................. ...............119









The Influence of Digital Technology on Cinema..................................................... 119
Run Lara Run .................................................... ... .... .... .......... ....123
Style Eclipses Content: Reinventing Popular Appeal ......................................123
Films and Games: A Winning Combination? ........................ ............... 129
Conquering Space through Speed ........................................ ............... 132
The Quest for Narrative .............. ..................................... 141
Superweib or Superwoman? .................... ..... ................. 145
Conclusion: Popular Cinema and Reflections on Originality................................151

5 STORAGE AND DISTRIBUTION THROUGH NEW MEDIA .......................... 154

Film Storage and Distribution: From the Early Years to the Internet ....................154
Films on CD-ROM: Valie Export's Medial Anagrams.......................................160
Syntagma and its Function in Bilder der Berihrungen..................................161
Intersections of Feminism and Technology ............................................... 166
Interactivity....................... ..... ................................ ........ 173
The Interface as M ise-en-Abym e ...................................... .......................... 175
Lim its and Control ................. ............................................... ...... ....... .... 180
The Next Generation of Film Storage: The DVD-Video .............. .....................183
Laserdisc M akes W ay for DVD-Video..................... ............. ....................183
Making Films Special: DVD Packaging and Marketing.............................. 187
Setting the Mood: The DVD-Video Interface...............................................197
Conclusion: What are Film and Cinema? Towards an Expanded Definition...........201

LIST OF REFERENCES ........................................................ .. ............... 205

B IO G R A PH IC A L SK E T C H ........................................ ............................................208















Abstract of Dissertation Presented to the Graduate School
of the University of Florida in Partial Fulfillment of the
Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy

TRANSFORMATIONS OF THE (SILVER) SCREEN: FILM AFTER NEW MEDIA

By

Margit Grieb

May 2003

Chair: Nora M. Alter
Major Department: Germanic and Slavic Studies

Transformations of the (Silver) Screen: Film After New Media focuses on German

cinema and new media productions. Within each of the chapters I examine emerging

technologies such as video, digital video, HDTV, videogames, and new technologies of

distribution and storage, e.g., Internet, satellite-streaming, CD-ROM, and DVD-Video,

and explore their impact on films and filmmakers, including Wim Wenders, Tim Tykwer,

and Valie Export. Using Bertolt Brecht's theories of implementing new media

technologies (i.e., film and radio) in his epic theater as a point of departure, I look at how

the aesthetic representation of emerging media, embedded within the "older"

representational system of film, is employed to enhance and expand the latter's

capabilities for artistic expression. One of the questions I attempt to answer is: How can

Brecht's epic practice be adapted successfully to the study and employment of new media

in art? I also address the relationship between gender and technology, in particular with

media that traditionally have been codified as male. I am particularly interested in how

artists re-invent and re-define the form and content of the conventional medium of film









and its institutional apparatus, the cinema, through the use of a technical innovation. My

arguments throughout the dissertation engage with the work of film, media, culture, and

feminist critics of the 20th century, including, among others, Theodor W. Adorno, Walter

Benjamin, Jay David Bolter, Bertolt Brecht, Hans Magnus Enzensberger, Valie Export,

Richard Grusin, Donna Haraway, Katherine Hayles, Friedrich Kittler, Peter Lunenfeld,

Roswitha Mueller, Marita Sturken, Sherry Turkle, Gregory Ulmer, and Wim Wenders.














CHAPTER 1
INTRODUCTION

[T]here seems to be a good deal of confusion as to what is new and what is old,
while fear that the old will return has become mixed with fear that the new will
step in [. .], artists would be well advised not to rely blindly on the assurance that
new ideas are welcome. Yet art can only find its feet by going ahead [. ..].

Bertolt Brecht, Brecht on Theater

Definitions

In the last decade the term "new media" has all but become synonymous with

emerging digital technologies. Indeed, Lev Manovich, in his seminal study The Language

of New Media, defines new media as "graphics, moving images, sounds, shapes, spaces,

and texts that have become computable" (20), and the equally important Remediation.

Understanding New Media by Jay David Bolter and Richard Grusin takes a similar

approach equating new media with digital media. My own study employs the

terminology new media in a way that relates to the more traditional semantic roots of the

term. New media, in the following chapters, are emerging twentieth century technologies,

analog and digital, that have in some way influenced, altered, refashioned, redirected, or

even replaced the nineteenth/twentieth century technology of film and its institutional

apparatus, the cinema.

The designation "new" is not meant to evoke the notion that new media are

historically or aesthetically unique, and developed out of a distinct rupture with any prior

systems. On the contrary, I base my inquiry on the premise that new media emerge from

within a historical, socio-political, and aesthetic system and draw upon this heritage for









their own definitions. New media, in my study, are emerging representational systems

that differ considerably in their technological make-up from existing technologies of the

cinema and which are able to expand, change, improve upon, or even replace aspects of

the latter's function within society. What renders these media "new" is not a matter of

singularity or uniqueness as a whole, but emerges as an unprecedented way of arranging

that which is already familiar. I begin my inquiry with an examination of Bertolt Brecht's

theory of Epic Theater that perceived as a new medium, capable of transforming the

culturally established institution of theater. Although most of the technologies I discuss

do, in fact, belong to the category "digital," it is less their binary origin that is definitive

for my study than the fact that the digital revolution has exerted more influence on film

than any other singular technological development. Even television, which ranks as a

close second, has gained most of its influential momentum from digital modifications. As

Manovich has pointed out, the computer has evolved as an acting filter for all types of

cultural productions (64). Therefore, although the term "new media" may not be

synonymous with digital media, but the two often overlap.

In the last decade, a number of studies have appeared that successfully inaugurate

the study of new media (speak digital media) as a scholarly field in its own right, one that

is no longer delegated as a subordinate category of the greater fields of film, media,

visual, popular culture, or cultural studies. Instead, new media studies, exists as a separate

field, albeit built on the traditions of film and visual studies. This link to the fields of film

and visual studies has, in part, allowed for it to be theorized within the rubric of

Humanities generally, and contemporary critical theory, specifically. In other words,

theories of new media are decidedly philosophical and cultural in their base, thereby









removing digital technologies from remaining in the exclusive domain of computer

science. Theorists thus illuminate how new media function not only as a technology, but

also as a dynamic force in contemporary culture. There exists a rich tradition of

scholarship concerned with new media which appeared prior to the explosion of digital

technology and before new media studies had officially achieved recognition as a field in

its own right, such as Marshall McLuhan's Understanding Media (1964), Hans Magnus

Enzensberger's Baukasten zu einer Theorie der Medien (1957-88), and Gregory Ulmer's

Teletheory (1989), to name but a few. In Understanding Media McLuhan discusses the

state of the then beginning explosion of mass media. He offers a media-centered

interpretation of history by attempting to isolate types of communication media as the

moving force in historical development. McLuhan coined the expressions "global

village" and "the medium is the message" to describe how and what we communicate. As

a contemporary of McLuhan, Enzensberger takes issue with Understanding Media's

technological determinism and instead situates the new technologies into a socio-political

context. In his essays he argues for media to become tools for everyone, instead of

remaining in the hands of economic powers, and for them to develop into a productive

rather than exploitative apparatus. Like McLuhan and Enzensberger, Ulmer's book also

identifies the new media as fundamentally changing the state of communications. He

postulates that video and electronic technologies are essential tools to provoke inventive

thinking as a privileged discourse in the new era of communications. He argues that

video allows for the institutional dissemination of inventive thinking in a similar way that

the alphabet allowed for critical literate argumentation.









Since then, in the 1990s, several significant works have contributed to the further

development of new media studies, most notably (in chronological order) Donna

Haraway's Simians, Cyborgs, and Women (1991), George P. Landow's Hypertext (1992),

Neil Postman's Technopoly (1992), Sherry Turkle's Life on the Screen (1995), and

Katherine Hayles's How We Became Posthuman (1999). Haraway's study, in particular

her essay "A Cyborg Manifesto," established a connection between new technologies and

feminism. Her arguments pointed to a new hybrid humanity, one that no longer operated

based on binary categories such as natural and artificial. Although, unlike Haraway's

study, Landow's text is not based on an explicitly feminist premise, he does establish

hypertext, with its non-linear structure, to be inherently open to advance the struggles of

those underprivileged in society. His study offers the first comprehensive analysis of this

new language, used mainly in online applications. While most of the theoretical analyses

mentioned thus far have approached new technologies from a positive standpoint, Neil

Postman offers a decidedly negative critique of the interaction between culture and

technology in Technopoly. For him, a "Technopoly" is a society that holds technology

and science in such high regard, that it elevates them into a position superior to human

judgment and capable of regulating all human affairs. Sherry Turkle, on the other hand,

dispels much of common criticisms about online technologies in her Life on the Screen

and sees new technologies of communication as potentially subversive tools and spaces.

Finally, Hayles's How We Became Posthuman builds on Haraway's cyborg theory and

calls for a renewed investment and interest in materialism, especially in conjunction with

information technologies.









Studies on new media proliferated immensely as we approached and entered into

the new millennium. The aforementioned Remediation (2000), Peter Lunenfeld's Snap to

Grid (2000), and The Language of New Media (2002) are the most important examples

for this. In Remediation, Bolter and Grusin offer a convincing analysis of the media, as

engaged in a constant refashioning of other, prior and contemporary, media. Snap to Grid

sees 1989 as a decisive point in history which has brought about a shift in contemporary

art and technology. Lunenfeld explores this shift and traces its effect on how we think

about and react to our surroundings via the new computer-generated screens. Manovich's

study of the nature and constitution of digital technologies has already become a classic

text in the short period of its availability in print.1 His basic arguments revolve around the

cinematic nature that has shaped all digital media and serves as a filter of how we interact

with the environment around us.

In general, most of the books and essays on new media that have appeared in recent

years have discussed, at least in part, what impact new technologies have had on existing

media. This includes radio, music, photography, literature, graphic novels, television, and

many other sites of artistic production. Since film represents the dominating visual

technology of the 20th century, new media's impact, digital and analog, on the cinema has

arguably been the most conspicuous. Studies that have devoted considerable attention to

new media's effects on film include the essays collected in Cinema Futures (1998, edited

by Elsaesser and Hoffmann) and The New Media Book (2002, edited by Dan Harries),






1 However, most of Manovich's arguments in this book have appeared in other publications and were
circulating widely online and in print before the publication of The Language of ..., Media.









and, as already mentioned, The Language of New Media.2 However, these accounts use a

descriptive, general approach to evaluate the changes that have occurred in cinema

productions of the last few years rather than providing pragmatic analyses of specific

films and filmmakers, as do my chapters.

Timothy Druckrey's collection of essays in Electronic Media ( highlights that

contemporary new media studies can trace part of its critical lineage to early 20th-century

German philosophical traditions from Martin Heidegger, Walter Benjamin, and the

Frankfurt School critics, to Hans Magnus Enzensberger, and Friedrich Kittler, however,

recent developments in new media studies have yet to leave a noticeable mark on the

state of German studies in general.3 Although theoretical foundations have been laid

through essays by Friedrich Kittler, Florian Rotzer, Peter Weibel, Siegfried Zielinski, and

Thomas Elsaesser, among others, there still exists a lack of practical applications of

German as well as Anglo-American new media theory to German-speaking artistic

productions. My account attempts to address this lack and provide analyses that

specifically focuses on German artistic practices and productions within the context of

new media.

Outline

As already mentioned, most new media scholarship has been focused on Anglo-

American cultural productions. My study departs from these publications in that it

includes German-specific case studies in chapters 3, 4, and 5. I am invoking these


2 Another book-long study treating cinematic interaction with new media, Future Cinema: The Cinematic
Imaginary After Film, edited by Peter Weibel and Jeffrey Shaw and based on the November 2002
exhibition Future Cinema at the ZMK in Karlsruhe, is due to appear from MIT Press.

3 Electronic Media features essays by Heidegger, and Enzensberger, as well as essays informed by Critical
Theory (a la Frankfurt school), Benjamin, Wittgenstein, Bfirger, and Freud.









specific moments of new media/film interaction in order to show the inseparability of

media form, content, and context in my approach, a notion that relies heavily on Brecht's

theories. My case studies are drawn exclusively from a broad field of German-language

cultural production, "the site of technical superiority" as video artist Martha Rosler calls

it (not without irony) (44), rather than covering a more comprehensive geographical area

or centering on the U.S., a site where public viewership, aesthetic production, and critical

evaluation have witnessed the most widely acknowledged instances of film and new

media intersections. Instead of concentrating on general trends in how new media has and

is affecting film, I narrow my critical focus to specific examples that illustrate very

specific effects. My methodology is defined by evaluating films that are not spawned by

the US studio production system. Instead I pay attention to filmmakers who are working

within the European state-supported system, which traditionally has allowed more

experimental work to emerge (although this is in the process of changing). In other

words, this study is an off-center look at some of the most interesting effects of new

media technologies on film.

Focus

My emphasis on revealing how the "old" medium of film has fared after its various

physical and aesthetic encounters with new forms of visual technology also departs from

the loci adopted by most other new media studies which have appeared in recent years.

These studies have adopted the opposite stance and look at how new media are building

on or changing older technologies. Important books using the "new media after old

media" approach include the aforementioned Remediation and The Language of New










Media,4 as well as Snap to Grid, How We Became Potlinun, Florian Rotzer's Digitale

Welenttiltrfe, Life on the Screen: Identity in the Age of the Internet, and several others. In

contrast, my critical lens is focused foremost on film and only vis-a-vis this vantage point

do I consider new media technologies. This approach is meant to follow in the footsteps

of Brecht who, in the majority of his theoretical writing, concentrated his efforts on the

theater in order to determine how the new media film and radio could transform it, rather

than tracing the vice-versa effect.5 In contrast, authors of other books in the field, such as

Manovich, predominantly discuss the nature of emerging digital media and, only to

fortify or supplement their analysis, give an account of the relationship new media share

with older technologies (in a variety of contexts such as historical, social, technological,

aesthetic, etc.). This is not to say that one approach is privileged over another, but it is

important to point out this particular perspective, because it constitutes a shift of

emphasis on which my arguments are built.

Within each of the chapters I examine a specific emerging technology such as

video, digital video, HDTV, computer/videogames, new technologies of distribution and



4 Although the predominant portion of The Language of ... Media uses the "from cinema to new media"
approach, Manovich devotes one chapter to tracing the opposite effect-how have digital technologies
changed the cinema. But even in this chapter he continually reverts back to privileging the new over the old
(as in his discussion of computer games as cinema).

5 Although Brecht devoted considerable energy to developing a theory of film and radio, which build on his
thoughts on theater, his dramatic theories and techniques became his most influential contribution to media
theory in the 20th century. I use Brecht's theory of the theater rather than his film or radio theory in my
project for two interrelated reasons: 1) his theory of the theater addresses the act of adapting and
incorporating new media into an existing representational form (just as my project attempts to do), and 2)
his theories of film, radio and sound borrows heavily from his theater ideas and are therefore not
dramatically different or new. What I do extract from his media theories, apart from the theater, is his
openness to use ideas developed for one specific medium to apply them to another. When we try to come to
terms with emerging cultural productions, forms, and apparatuses, we are dependent on our prior
knowledge and experience to make sense of the so-called new. The emerging forms and practices
themselves come into being that way, they do not erupt spontaneously out of nowhere; they incorporate an
existing history simply by being preceded by other media.









storage, e.g., DVD-Video, CD-ROM, Laserdisc, Internet, satellite-streaming, etc., and

explore their impact on films and filmmakers, including Wim Wenders, Tom Tykwer,

and Valie Export. I use Brecht's theories of implementing new media technologies (i.e.,

film and radio) in his epic theater as a point of departure and expand on his ideas by

analyzing and adapting the theories of other media critics to augment my own approach.

In general, I am interested in how artists re-invent, re-define, or re-discover the form and

content of the conventional medium of film and the cinema as an institution through the

use of a technical innovation.

The following chapters also address how artists, filmmakers, and theorists apply

gender-specific concerns in their approach to new media and their wide-ranging

influences. This includes an account of the creative employment of fictional characters to

permeate traditionally defined and restricted categories of what constitute male and

female spheres and stereotypes. Although most technologies developed in the 20th

century were initially conceptualized and constructed to serve a patriarchic order (often

dealing with concerns of war and world order domination), they are not necessarily

opposed to serving feminist ideologies

Chapter 2, "New Media in Theory and Practice," serves as a theory-centered

introduction to the current and historical field of new media. I show special consideration

for new media theory that includes arguments concerning the intersections of old and new

technologies as well as theoretical discourses which negotiate the intersections of new

media and gender studies. Due to the overwhelming presence of digital new media in my

study, the theoretical background laid out in the second chapter also reflects this

inflection. In this chapter, I rely heavily on critical concepts set forth by Walter Benjamin









(his evaluation of the Epic Theater), Enzensberger (his notion of the consciousness

industry), Bolter and Grusin (their terminology of hypermediation, immediacy, and

remediation), and Jirgen Habermas, Oskar Negt, and Alexander Kluge (their theories

concerning the public spheres), as well as Roswitha Mueller (her evaluation of Brecht's

impact on media theory). Apart from covering current and past theorists, I resort to a

thinker and artist belonging to the early to mid-twentieth century, Brecht. One of the

questions I attempt to answer in this chapter is: How can Brecht's epic practice be

adapted successfully to the study and employment of new media in film? I contend that

applying an updated version of Brechtian tactics of producing alienation (and the

resulting contemplative and critical distance), audience participation, humor, and

delivering revolutionary entertainment to a large sector of society can lead to productive

interactive experiences with and substantive evaluations of mediated spaces and

artworks.

Brecht's significance to digital aesthetics and film production of the late 20th and

early 2lst century is not simply based on the similarity of the social, economic, and

technological changes which he faced in the 1920s and 1930s and those that we face

today. In other words, I do not propose to translate Brecht's specific techniques without

transformations to new media. The new technologies and historical particulars have made

these techniques obsolete. Brecht, himself, would have strongly disagreed with such an

approach. He saw "the modern Epic Theater [. .] linked with certain trends," (76) and as

such historically specific. He adds that new forms of representation demand techniques

that are adjusted to fit them specifically. Because our present situation includes media,

digital and analog, that were not part of Brecht's context, his ideas have to be adapted to









reflect these media. The filmmakers which I discuss in the subsequent chapters have all

attempted to include digital and other new technologies into their filmmaking approach

and therefore more or less overtly engaged with Brecht's progressive ideas on changing

an existing apparatus by introducing a new technology.

In chapter 3, "Video and Film," I investigate the influence of video and television

on other media, especially film. I focus on Wim Wenders's practical employment as well

as fictional treatment of video and TV technologies and attempt to explore not only his

ambivalence toward advancements in visual recordings but also discuss the reflection of

this emotionally unstable attitude within the fictional setting of his films. In my analysis,

I use recent films, such as Until the End of the World (1991) and The End of Violence

(1997) to exemplify my arguments. Although Wenders asserts in many of his theoretical

remarks that his experimentation with new media confronts the technological and

aesthetic limits of the medium in question, I illustrate that his negative assessment of

video (digital or not) stems from a dissatisfaction with existing institutional constraints,

not the medium itself.

Chapter 4, "Computer Games and Film," analyzes the impact of digital

technologies on film. Specifically, I chronicle the emergence of the videogame-a

specific type of digital technology-and its interrelated and productive relationship with

the medium film. Tim Tykwer's Run Lola Run (1998) appears as an exemplar of an intra-

filmic reference to extra-filmic new media, the computer/videogame, through the

employment of a formal rupture. I show that Run Lola Run's reworking of the videogame

aesthetic and subject matter represents a successful attempt at opening up dominant









cinematic conventions while still retaining its popular appeal for audiences in Germany

and abroad.

Chapter 5, "Storage Distribution through New Media," looks at new technologies

of distribution and storage, such as video, laserdisc, CD-ROM, DVD-Video, and the

WWW, and examines how these technologies have shaped film consumption,

distribution, form and content, as well as traces the effect on their accompanying

institutional systems. In this final section I concentrate in particular on Valie Export's

CD-ROM Bilder der Berihrungen to determine the effects of repackaging and

recontextualizing her experimental film Syntagma. I pay special attention to Export's

feminist ideological goals and how distribution and storage media can undermine or

accommodate such ambitions. Moreover, I give an account of the current state of DVD-

Video distribution of German language films, especially re-releases of films from the

Weimar Republic and the era of New German Cinema, and how this distribution has

affected the politics of restoration, as well as the appearance and reception of these films

worldwide.

Throughout this study, I address the relationship between gender and technology, in

particular with media that traditionally have been codified as male. I am particularly

interested in how female and male artists re-invent and re-define gender stereotypes and

politics of access inherent in technological conventions. Each medium discussed,

including film, carries with it a cultural context in which it appears, and therefore also

appears embedded in familiar contentions of gender. In the artistic contexts, in which all

of these media appear in my study, these discursive practices are both undermined and

reinforced, and, at best, defined in completely new terms.















CHAPTER 2
NEW MEDIA IN THEORY AND PRACTICE

Anybody who advises us not to make use of such new apparatus just confirms the
apparatus's right to do bad work; he forgets himself out of sheer open-mindedness,
for he is thus proclaiming his willingness to have nothing but dirt produced for him.
At the same time he deprives us in advance of the apparatus which we need in order
to produce, since this way of producing is likely more and more to supersede the
present one, forcing us to speak through increasingly complex media and to express
what we have to say by increasingly inadequate means.

Bertolt Brecht, Brecht on Theater

The Experiment of Epic Theater

What matters therefore is the exemplary character of production, which is able first
to induce other producers to produce, and second to put an improved apparatus at
their disposal. And this apparatus is better the more consumers it is able to turn into
producers, that is, readers or spectators into collaborators.

Walter Benjamin, "The Author as Producer"

Walter Benjamin's essays, "The Work of Art in the Age of Mechanical

Reproduction" (1936) and "The Author as Producer" (1934), emerged in the context of

discussions about the function and responsibility of art in the twentieth century.1 Whereas

the former examines the changing appearance, purpose, and effect of art in a new

technological age, the latter presupposes these changed conditions and uses them as a

1 Shortly after these essays were written, the possible intervention of art in political realities culminated in a
particularly contentious discourse in the specific context of Germany's National-Socialist government in
the so-called Expressionismus-Realismus Debatte of the nineteen-thirties. The discussion involved writers
living in exile in order to escape the persecution of the Nazi regime. It addressed their role as dissident
cultural representatives and producers, as well as the function of literature in general. The debate initially
set out to take up the issue of expressionism as either a direct artistic link leading to the rise of the National
Socialist Party and Hitler or as a significant literary precursor of the anti-fascist artistic production, e.g.,
from expressionistic to anti-fascist works in the case of exile writer Brecht. Essays by Bernhard Ziegler
(alias Alfred Kurella) and Klaus Mann dealing with Gottfried Benn's leanings toward fascism were
published in September of 1937 in the influential exile literary journal Das Wort. See Schmitt's Die
Expressionismusdebatte: Materialien zu einer marxistischen Realismuskonzeption for a collection of the
contributions to this debate.









point of departure.2 In "The Author as Producer," Benjamin examines the ways in which

the process of reproduction can either render a work a revolutionary tool or only

propagate the very social conditions to which it ostensibly reacts. Benjamin uses Brecht's

theories of Epic Theater as an illustration of a successful attempt at changing the former

bourgeois cultural apparatus, the theater, into a tool that artists can utilize to produce

politically relevant material. In his arguments, Benjamin emphasizes how Epic Theater,

"instead of competing with newer instruments of publication, seeks to use and learn from

them, in short to enter into a debate with them" (266, my emphasis). This dialogical

relationship, of course, refers not only to Brecht's transformation of the Aristotelian

theater in general, but also applies specifically to his innovative approach incorporating

new media forms, especially those already in (ab)use by the Fascist Propaganda Ministry

to introduce aesthetics into politics, namely film and radio ("Work of Art" 24). Benjamin

responds to and reiterates Brecht's focus on Epic Theater's intention to serve as an

institutional critique, emphasizing that the play's effect on the audience is less important

than its effect on the theater as an institution (Brecht 22). This emphasis attests to

Brecht's conviction that attempting to produce socially responsible entertainment would

have a two-fold effect: it would transform the medium, which in turn would change the

message, i.e., deliver a revolutionary product to the audience.

Peter Btirger points out in his seminal study Theory of the Avant-Garde that Brecht

constitutes an artistic enigma in the context of vanguard art movements and artists of the

twenties and thirties. He declares that although Brecht is part of the historical avant-


2 Benjamin wrote "The Author as Producer" in the context of Soviet discussions about the function and task
of literature in a socialist society. His essay was delivered as a speech at the Institute for Studies Related to
Fascism in Paris, on April 27, 1934. The essay's aim is therefore more praxis-centered than the theory-
based "The Work of Art in the Age of Mechanical Reproduction."









garde, he is also diametrically opposed to one of this movement's fundamental

characteristics: the avant-garde's attempt to destroy art as an institution. Indeed, Brecht

does not attempt to abolish the theater as an institutional apparatus.3 Instead, according to

Burger, he intends to sublate theater's bourgeois function in exchange for the "new,"

ideologically altered, Epic Theater (88-89).4 In retrospect, Brecht's approach constituted

a more productive artistic method than that of the other vanguard artists.5 Since art as an

institution was destroyed by neither the historical avant-garde in the beginning of the

twentieth century, nor by the neo-avant-garde of the sixties and seventies, it becomes

questionable whether such an undertaking was ever possible or even desirable.

Brecht's attempts at reworking an apparatus from within its own workings not only

has more practical value, but it also makes his approach relevant for contemporary art

practice, where the spheres of art and commodification are inextricably intertwined.

However, I agree with Btrger when he warns not to try to "adopt Brecht's and

Benjamin's solutions along with their recognition of the problem and to transfer them

historically to the present" (90). Brecht, himself, would have strongly disagreed with

such an approach. He saw "the modern Epic Theater linked with certain [socio-political]

trends," (76) and as such historically specific. In his theories on the theater Brecht

explicitly states that all methods and stimuli are bound to their historical context and that



3 I am using the term apparatus in a Brechtian sense which, for the theater, includes the stage and theater
building, the performers and the plays being performed, the promotional system, the social practices that
are at work in theater-going, and the institutional backbone of all that involves the theater. In modem
usage, Brecht's apparatus would be called a medium.

4 Bifrger defines the Hegelian understanding of sublation in reference to art as "not to be simply destroyed,
but transferred to the praxis of life where [art] would be preserved, albeit in a changed form" (49).

5 For an overview of general avant-garde practices and artworks described in Bifrger's Theory of the Avant-
Garde, see pp. 55-82.









they must be adapted (or even changed) to be applied successfully to a different historical

context; "reality alters; to represent it, the means of representation must alter too" (110).

Presently, the means of representation have been expanded beyond film and radio

to include post-Brechtian analog and digital media. Therefore, our changed realities can

and must be expressed using these new media. Specific Brechtian methods, replicated

without alteration, cannot intervene in such changed realities. Many of the innovative

techniques aimed at producing alienation in Brecht's Epic Theater have been co-opted by

the language system of commodity culture and become almost commonplace in today's

sphere of arts and entertainment (and where these two overlap) in mass media. Therefore,

Brecht's epic elements would, in Brecht's own words, "lack force and effectiveness" (27)

and could not have "the force of what is startling" (71) in contemporary contexts.6

Frederic Jameson describes this phenomenon (which is symptomatic of postmodern

society) as an assimilation of critical elements "to the point where many of our older

critical and evaluative categories no longer seem functional" (31); this is the moment

where an alienating component of Epic Theater becomes an innocuous diversion and/or

part of a commercial configuration. Hans Magnus Enzensberger also echoes Brecht's

observation when he states: "Once [such a moment is] annexed to the heritage that must

be preserved, it is truly deprived of its life, that is, removed from criticism and exhibited

as an embalmed holy relic" ("Aporias" 19), but shifts the emphasis away from

commercial commodification, as in Enzensberger's comment, to institutional

canonization. Either way, alienation no longer takes place. However, Brecht's approach,

6 Benjamin and Brecht both see shock, emerging from unexpected arrangement of the familiar, as a vital
part of art's operative effect on the viewer. In a more contemporary account, in "The Work of Culture in
the Age of Cybernetic Systems," Bill Nichols sees the effect of shock re-emerging in digital simulations
with the recognition of "the reification of a fundamental social process," such as communication (129).









while not his specific realization of it, is still relevant today due to his use of innovative

practices and technology as key elements to administering institutional critiques,

invigorating stagnant material and genres, and producing alienation, which collectively

result in achieving a productive contemplative and critical distance for audiences. At this

point, it is necessary to inquire into some of Brecht's theoretical schemata for his

implementation of technological innovations and chances for spectator interactivity in

Epic Theater in order to extract some key elements that can "survive" an application in a

digital "epic" practice.7

The Epic Theater Stage

The use of technological devices on stage was for Brecht an important step toward

realizing his Epic Theater project. With the use of technology "the stage began to tell a

story. The narrator was no longer missing, along with the fourth wall" (Brecht 71).8 He

introduced a myriad of devices into the staging of plays, most of which were taken from

the domain of popular culture. He included film projections, radio transmissions,

gramophone recordings, photographs, and other devices into his stage productions

refusing to observe what had previously been regarded as a sphere of high culture, and

therefore inappropriate to accommodate mass media.

One of Brecht's underlying motives for changing the character of the institution of

theater was his deference and concern for the public as a whole and rooted in his political

convictions. His break with conventions of realism and popular entertainment was


7 For a more rigorous and comprehensive analysis into Epic Theater's relationship to media theory in
general, see Roswitha Mueller's Bertolt Brecht and the Theory of Media.

8 By erecting the "forth wall" Brecht meant to signify the Aristotelian theater's practice to create the
illusion that the events on stage were "real" and for spectators to be cut off from that reality, so that they
can lose themselves in the action.









motivated by his progressive political stance. He re-defined both categories, realistic and

popular, in his Epic Theater which tried to be both, but not in terms of conventions.

Brecht wanted to turn the theater into an apparatus that could be "used in a way that

might mean something to a contemporary public that earns real contemporary beef' (6-

7). The Epic Theater did not just appeal to upper middle class audiences (as did the

bourgeois theater), but should speak to the masses as well.9 However, this audience

would not be put in a trance and addressed in emotional terms, as was the case in the

"old" Aristotelian theater; only an appeal to reason would do (23). Brecht did not view

the public as a homogenous mass, unable to conjure up any sensitivity toward aesthetic

practices apart from meaningless entertainment. Instead, he points out that society cannot

expect persons to act socially and politically responsible, hold them accountable for their

actions, but simultaneously assume that their aesthetic competence is that of a child. He

declares: "The one tribute we can pay the audience is to treat it as thoroughly intelligent.

It is utterly wrong to treat people as simpletons when they are grown up at seventeen. I

appeal to the reason" (14). This positive attitude toward the spectator made it possible for

Brecht to develop a variety of possible approaches in order to address what he saw as

untapped potential and shape his Epic Theater based on the premise of pedagogy.10 His


9 He sometimes referred to this audience as "audience of the scientific age" (28, 183-188), which lent his
experiment the historical impetus to change the theater that still directed itself toward the non-scientific
person, the bourgeois spectator.

10 This attitude set him apart from other German cultural critics such as Lukacs and Adorno. The former
believes that the spectator needs a positive hero for identification ("Es geht um den Realismus"), and the
latter considers the spectator to be completely consumed by and an object of the culture industry, unable to
resist its capitalist ideology ("The Culture Industry" 142). Benjamin, on the other hand, agrees with Brecht
and sees a positive change in the reception of art which loses its aura through the invention of mass
reproduction (see his essay "The Work of Art in the Age of Mechanical Reproduction"). Although, it must
be mentioned that Brecht's optimistic attitude toward the public, after 1933, became tarnished by the events
that lead up to and took place during the Nazi-era. He concedes that the lack of success of Epic Theater is
related to the fact that "their taste and their instincts are oppressed [. .]"(160), but still maintains the
possibility of "success in transforming them" (161).









aesthetic tools include technology, humor, and didactics; his goals encompass pleasure

and development of critical thinking. Brecht's ultimate aim was to arrive at meaningful

entertainment. In contrast, the bourgeois institution of theater expected the audience to

hang "its brains up in the cloakroom along with its coat" (27) (not unlike what

Hollywood expects its audience to do in much of contemporary cinema).

In order to produce such meaningful entertainment, Brecht employed the help of

technology. He was not alone in his enthusiasm for bringing recent technical innovations

into the service of the theater. Brecht's contemporaries Walter Gropius and Erwin

Piscator both sought to use new media as a tool to revamp traditional stage props and

techniques. Since Brecht initially collaborated with both Piscator and Gropius on several

projects, their methods helped shape his own practices." However, unlike Brecht who

always insisted on anti-illusionism, Piscator and Gropius saw their innovative ideas as

means to "submerge the audience in the heightened illusion of being present at the actual

site of scenic events" (Mueller 7). Nonetheless, there are theoretical overlaps between

Piscator and Brecht in reference to implementing technology on stage. Like Brecht,

Piscator used fiction and documentary film scenes to comment on the dramatic action

which they interrupted, in the style of a Greek chorus (9). But most importantly, Piscator

envisioned developing a technically enhanced stage practice that "no longer considers the

audience a fictive concept, but includes it into the theater as a live force" (quoted in

Mueller 7).12 Although these enhancements were meant to bring the audience into the




1 Most of these collaborations took place in the late 1920s and included the play Rasputin (based on
Tolstoi) and the Good Soldier Schweik (based on Hasek).
12 For a more detailed account of Piscator's practices and theories concerning the stage see Piscator by
Heinrich Goertz.









dramatic action as participants, Piscator never went as far with this concept as Brecht

ultimately did, especially when he introduced the Lehli ,ii k into his repertoire.

The Lehrstiick and Schaustiick Meet Technology

In order to "keep the productive apparatus of the working-class theatre well clear of

the general drug traffic conducted by bourgeois show business" (Brecht 88-89) and

change the attitude of both institution and audience, Brecht developed the concept of the

Lehrstuck13 (as he translates it, a learning play).14 What makes the concept of a didactic

play so interesting and also topical is its emphasis on instruction through active

performance, rather than passive observation; it eradicates the distance between

performer and spectator ordinarily expected in the theater. In the Lehrstuck the spectator

is called upon to become an actor in the play. Through the alienating principles that are

applied to acting in Epic Theater, the participator attains a critical distance to the role s/he

performs and the materials used in the performance, for example, new technological

devices. Underlying this "new" dramatic genre, of course, was Brecht's political

commitment and the "notion that moral and political lessons could be taught best by

participation in an actual performance" (33). He set up the Lehli \tii k in opposition to

Aristotelian theater whose main purpose was to show the world as a timeless, static

whole. The Lehi, 'tii k, on the other hand, shows the world in a dynamic manner, as

constantly changing and, most importantly, as changeable (79).


13 Some examples of Lehrstiicke are Ozean Flug (1929), Der Jasager (1929), Die Massnahme (1930), and
Die Ausnahme undDie Regel (1930). His most successful and critically acclaimed plays such as Die Mutter
(1930), Die heilige Johanna der Schlachthofe (1929-1930), Mutter Courage und ihre Kinder (1939), and
Das Leben des Galilei (1938-44, 1945-53) were not conceived as didactic plays but rather as Schaustfcke,
created for professional actors.
14 Brecht renders the term Lehrstfck into English as "learning play" (it should actually be "teaching play").
I think this semantic ambiguity conveys the dual function of the didactic play nicely: it is used by the
performers and the playwright to teach and to learn simultaneously.









The Ozean Flug (1929), for example, is an experiment in the application of

Umfunktionierung"1 to the radio and performed as a Horspiel-Lehln l\// k (radio play).16

Brecht declared that the play is not "intended to be of use to the present-day radio but to

alter it. The increasing concentration of mechanical means callfor a kind of resistance by

the listener" (Brecht 32, my emphasis). In the first production of the play, in 1929 at the

Baden Baden Music Festival, accompanied by the music of Kurt Weill and Paul

Hindemith, Brecht demonstrated the radio's potential as a medium for communication

rather than distribution. On the left side of the stage was the radio orchestra with singers

and technical gadgets, and on the right side was the actor (intended listener) who

performed Lindbergh's part. However, the play was originally conceived as a Horspiel,

not a play on stage. Therefore, as a radio play, the part of Lindbergh was meant to be read

by the actual listeners at home who were given scripts of the text. In another production,

more true to Brecht's original conception, the play used the radio as a broadcasting

device to transmit music and solo performances into schools where the pupils could sing

the chorus and play some of the roles themselves. Instead of the radio's usual function,

that is the transmission of state-sanctioned materials, it could be used as a device to

develop "collaboration [. .] between participant and apparatus" (31).

Brecht had a very specific goal in mind when he developed the Lehl \i//A k Its

theoretical basis was related primarily to his socio-political outlook and was firmly





15 "Umfunktionierung" is a term coined by Brecht to mean "freeing the means of production and serving
the class struggle" (Benjamin "Author 261).
16 This Horspiel was initially titled Der Liniidrtlerlhti and later changed because of Lindbergh's
sympathies with the Nazi Party.









grounded in the historical context of Brecht's time and location. Roswitha Mueller

explains:

The Lehrstuck [. .] marks a qualitative change in the structure of communication
itself. The historical basis for the Lehi tli\/ k is a society in transition to socialism. In
this situation the central concern is to find ways of learning that are adequate for
the new state. Lenin's question about how and what one should learn is the basic
impulse for the theory of the Lehrstuck. [ .] The Lelin \i/t k does not imply total
discontinuity with epic techniques. Brecht emphasizes that epic techniques are the
basis for the Lehrstuck but that many of the projected goals of the "new drama" can
be realized to their fullest extent only within the context of a Lehi \it// kA (28-29)

However, elsewhere she notes that the Lehre that was embedded in this type of play

cannot be contained by Marxism-Leninism as a kind of dogmatic thesis play. It
remains a genuinely utopian project. As far as the general goals of the Lehi lii/L k
are concerned, these theoretical tenets are not meant to tower over the play as
eternal truths. While Brecht departed from and made use of current political
theories, he approached them undogmatically. Aware of their faulty and time-
bound character, he opened them up for discussion. Brecht expressly pointed out
that the commentary may be changed at any time: "It is full of mistakes with
respect to our time and its virtues, and it is unusable for other times." In that sense
the Lehre and the "opinions" or "theories" are a pre-text, a provisional statement
summarizing the state of the arts and theory as a starting point for further
development. (37)

This further development can be seen as the act of adapting Brecht's Lehi iit\ k theory

and practice into contemporary contexts of interactive media. However, as in every act of

adaptation, not only changing social and political contexts have to be considered but also

changes in the approach are essential in order to make the transition to another medium.

The nature of the new medium will define how the transition and adaptation can be

successful.

In the S.L /IhiiitiL k technological innovations served a similar function as in the

Lehrstuck. Film projections were used to disrupt the performance, to intrude upon the

"'representation' with 'formulation'" (Brecht 43) (most obvious in the case of titles), and

to historicize events, bringing the background to the forefront (in the case of narrative









projections). Whereas representation effaced the artificiality and intervention of the

technological devices, formulation would foreground them as separate media with

specific tasks. Film scenes and titles also facilitated the epic style of acting. For Brecht,

when the epic performer reads and watches, s/he cannot be carried away by her/his own

acting; the performer retains an epic distance from the character that s/he plays (44, 57-

58).

Building on Brecht

Interaction, Participation, and Vergniigen

The idea of audience/player interaction and participation was taken up again by

Brecht in his theory on the radio. He envisioned the radio to become "the finest possible

communication apparatus in public life, if it knew how to receive as well as to transmit,

to bring [the listener] into a relationship instead of isolating him" (Brecht 52). Some

years later, Enzensberger builds on Brecht's theory and Benjamin's two essays discussed

earlier in his treatise "Constituents of a Theory of the Media," 1970. Although formulated

over thirty years ago, Enzensberger's observations still circulate in current media

criticism. The main argument revolves around the lack of reciprocity in media such as

radio, television, film, and video, a lack not stemming from the technology itself, but

rather "artificially reinforced" (70) by what Enzensberger terms "the consciousness

industry.""17 With this criticism, he implicitly positions himself as counteracting the

technological determinism of popular media critic Marshall McLuhan while at the same

time setting himself apart from his fellow German culture media critics Theodor W.

Adorno and Max Horkheimer, who, in an earlier study had coined the term "culture


1 The essay "Das Nullmedium oder Warum alle Klagen iiber das Fernsehen gegenstandslos sind" (1988),
analyzes TV and its function in the consciousness industry more rigorously.









industry."18 In "The Industrialisation of the Mind" (1962) Enzensberger takes issue with

Adorno and Horkheimer's "culture industry" because it fails to acknowledge that critics

of such a system are also products of it. Enzensberger believes that the escape from

complete commodification does not lie "outside" of the system, e.g., in a privileged

position of the critics themselves or in avant-garde art as Adorno claims in his Aesthetic

Theory, but that resistance must come from within (the medium and the industry). In

order to explain the artificiality of radio's non-reciprocal function further, Enzensberger

argues, "the technical distinction between receivers and transmitters reflects the social

division of labor into producers and consumers [. .]"(64). The media industry has a

vested interest to keep mass media a one-sided affair, because these media have the

primary purpose "to 'sell' the existing order, to perpetuate the prevailing pattern of man's

domination by man [. .]" ("Industrialisation" 10); in other words, mass media is the life

support system of the consciousness industry. Katherine Hayles (1993) complicates and

opens up this argument further by pointing out that radio and television may transmit and

receive signals, but are unable to act as sites for permanent storage ("Virtual Bodies"

262). This impermanence allows these media to resist appropriation by a dominant

system. Dominant ideology must be continually re-transmitted because, unlike book

technology, it is not preserved in a physical and therefore semi-permanent form.

Enzensberger's essay investigates how these transmissions are put into practice. What is


is Max Horkheimer and Theodor Adorno did not share Benjamin and Brecht's positive evaluation of mass
media technology such as film. They voice harsh criticism in their study "The Culture Industry:
Enlightenment as Mass Deception" which connects mass media to the culture industry. It is important to
note, however, that this study was written during and after WWII. Consequently it resonates despair and
pessimism as a reaction to the atrocities that had taken place. "Film, radio and magazines make up a system
which is uniform as a whole and in every part" (120) and "the universal triumph of the rhythm of
mechanical production and reproduction promises that nothing changes, and nothing unsuitable will
appear" (134) is their response to Benjamin and Brecht's engagements with mass media as a potential agent
in political and social reform.









especially interesting about his essay is that while he exposes, on the one hand, the

artificiality of media's function in society (as transmitters only), on the other, he points

out that even those instruments of the media that are functioning ostensibly as two-way

apparatuses, for example, the XEROX machine, only allow for participation that

"remains socially and therefore aesthetically irrelevant" (70) due to capitalized ownership

and control of the technology.19 In the age of the cell phone (a radio-like device), the

Internet, computer games, CD-ROMs, DVD-ROMs, and all media that invite the

spectator/participant to engage in interactive relationships, and at the same time allow for

less restrictive access to the technology, this is increasingly a relevant issue.

Enzensberger's revisiting of Brecht's radio theory, thus can be transposed into the

contemporary context.

Apart from Brecht's emphasis on interactive artistic practices, as outlined in his

radio theory, his experiments also include an emphasis on retaining the entertainment

value of artistic creations. To some degree interactivity and popular enjoyment already

occupy common cultural space in today's realm of the media. Not only do videogames, a

favorite pastime for an ever increasing number of people, rely on interactivity to keep

players entertained and heighten the fun, but interactivity in general has gained

considerable currency in public attitude. In the last couple of decades, interactive

experiences have infiltrated all sectors of art and entertainment, high and low, from

museum installations and performances to films on DVD and popular television shows.


19 Jean Baudrillard criticizes Enzensberger's concept of radio as a two-way receiver/transmitter sharply by
pointing out that if all receivers become transmitters the only thing to be gained is socially irrelevant chatter
and not a revolution in the communications structures of mass media (Uecker 43). However, Enzensberger
anticipates such criticism with his Xerox remark to qualify that two-way communication must include
socially and politically relevant speech acts. As with Brecht, form and content cannot be separated for
Enzensberger.









Spectators are invited to become participants in a museum display, explore links related

to films stored on DVDs, and vote for their favorite "American Idol" star on television.

As Greg M. Smith points out in On a Silver Platter, contemporary culture views

interactivity as a positive media attribute, because it agrees with society's values that

regard action as positive and passivity, usually attributed to the media film and television,

as negative (10-12). In other words, interactivity is a concept that is easy to sell to today's

public, because it coincides with an already present value system. In Brecht's time,

however, letting the spectators co-mingle with and even replace professional actors and

actresses and interact with the playwright was unknown. Passively watching (consuming)

a play in the theater was a respected intellectual activity in itself and therefore unlikely to

allow for any change in audience status (such as audiences turning into actors).20 But for

Brecht, this attitude belonged to the theater of the previous century and its accompanying

bourgeois public sphere.

Brecht's overall approach was influenced by his progressive attitude toward artistic

practices and experiments.21 He attempted to "train" people to appreciate and therefore

enjoy art through a more complex reception than simply eliciting empathy and agreement

with what was shown to them. He explains why he interjects enjoyment into his theatrical

productions:

[My plays] are a kind of report on life as any member of the audience would like to
see it. Since at the same time, however, he sees a good deal he has no wish to see;

20 Blurring the boundaries between professional and amateur acting is experiencing increased popularity
right now on so called reality TV programs. However, unlike in Brecht's Lehrstfick practice, including non-
professional actors in these programs stems primarily from a desire to deliver a more life-like, real-seeming
product to a public which seems to respond with interest to such misrepresentations.

21 The avant-garde artists also challenged the notion of the passive spectator with their performances and
public exchanges. However, following Buirger's thesis in Theory of the Avant Garde, their purpose was not
to revolutionize the institution of art, as was Brecht's aim, but to destroy it.









since therefore he sees his wishes not merely fulfilled but also criticized (sees
himself not as the subject but as the object), he is theoretically in a position to
appoint a new function for the theatre. (43)

This strategy, using the audience's desire for divertissement and then turning it against

them, is certainly more prudent, than expecting spectators to understand and "like" an

aesthetic practice to which they can in no way relate.

Pleasure, in Brechtian terms, could be divided into two categories, which he

differentiated as Genuss and Veiginilgen Whereas Genuss is related to passive uncritical

consumption, as found in pleasure derived from viewing traditional theater plays,

Vei iiiigen "points to a productive attitude in the audience-it carries the connotation of

expert understanding of the quality and hence the process of production of a play"

(Mueller 23). When spectators become participants in Brecht's Lehn l ii, k, they

experience Velgrnlgenl through their multifaceted experience (including interaction with

the play, the stage and set, the playwright, and the institution as a whole). Part of

Velignilgen, as well as Brecht's progressive political agenda, is the act of inducing in the

spectator/participant a sense of alienation, realized in the moment when, through their

interactive experience, s/he questions her/his own subject/object status (as a product or

reproducer of the dominant system), and subsequently her/his resistance constitutes a

political act.

If progressive criticism is what Enzensberger calls "the readiness to revise all

solidified theses, to examine endlessly its own premises" and reactionary criticism that

which "considers itself, so to speak, naturally and everlastingly in the right, exempt from

reflecting on its presuppositions" ("Aporias" 18), Brecht undoubtedly practiced the

former. He understands that it is not just the technological possibility (the opportunity to

interact with the medium) itself that makes media function in a politically responsible









way, but that there must be artistic intervention, didactic interference, and a readiness to

discard or violate existing conventions. Brecht's artistic undertaking was from the very

beginning focused on a radical transformation of an existing institution, the theatre,

which was to become part of the "'ideological superstructure' for a solid, practical

rearrangement of our age's way of life" (Brecht 23). In other words, his Epic Theater

could not be divorced from his Marxist ideology. His theories on how to induce audience

awareness of a medium's language and willingness to reflect on the medium's

institutional make-up, however, can find a broader spectrum of application. This is

especially important with media that resist critical spectator interrogations, most notably

film and its institutional apparatus, the cinema. But Brecht's theories are also applicable

in the realm of more recent technological inventions, such as the Internet, CD-ROM, and

videogames, where the medium may invite such criticism within its formal set-up but too

often simultaneously resists it through its content presentation.22 Although these media all

share a popular place in the sphere of mass media entertainment, this appeal is not

destined to thrive off the desire for distraction alone but can be directed toward a more

meaningful, Vergniigen-like experience.

Furthermore, for Brecht, popular entertainment is part of his progressive political

stance and used to battle a tradition of banal and escapist distractions. He declares:

'Popular' means intelligible to the broad masses, taking over their own forms of
expression and enriching them / adopting and consolidating their standpoint /
representing the most progressive section of the people in such a way that it can

22 The mere possibility for interactivity is by no means a guarantee for productive critical inquiries into
digital domains. If material that is presented lacks substance, then the experience naturally stays superficial.
Some scholars attribute the distance between the simulated and physical life as a limitation on the merits of
interactive media. Florian R6tzer, for example, views interactive computer games as media where "one
constantly sees that which one can neither be nor have" ("Between Nodes" 255). However, I do not see
this effect as specific to computer games. TV, films, and books can peddle these desires as well, a feature
that advertising companies explore to its fullest.









take over the leadership: thus intelligible to other sections too / linking with
tradition and carrying it further / handing on the achievements of the section now
leading to the section of the people that is struggling for the lead." (108)

Popular does not just apply to that which appeals to the general public, but defines what

engages them in the shaping of their own tastes. He declares: "Besides beingpopular

there is such a thing as becoming popular" (112). In other words, art has a responsibility

to make itself accessible not just to an elite part of the population but to as large a

segment as possible. Although it was part of the spectator's responsibility to acquire taste

for such art, it was up to the artist to deliver the goods. As Mueller points out:

With the advent of mass culture, film, radio, and television began to take over the
function opera had formerly fulfilled. At the same time the consumer attitude
developed a double character. While passive consumption is, as Benjamin had
pointed out, the attitude of the exploiter, the situation in the case of the mass media
is more complex. Exploitation rebounds upon the audience itself. Brecht coined the
word "inploitation" (Einbeutung) for the spectator's position, ambivalently split
into exploiter and exploited. Brecht sees the audience as the cause and as the victim
of a system that divides production and pleasure. This state of affairs has
repercussions for both terms-on the one hand, it marks work and productivity, as
devoid of pleasure, and on the other it keeps pleasure free of productivity for the
sake of the work. (24)

In order to extract the consumer/spectator from this ambivalent position in Einbeutung

Brecht developed interactive audience experiences. Productivity in the Epic Theater

could again be linked to pleasure as Veilginigen

Brecht's didactical dimension, manifested in the Lehrstick which aimed at teaching

spectators how to critically approach art, can be transposed onto new media practices that

incorporate interactivity into their design. Allowing the spectator to become an active

participant in the action leads to the participant's insights into the construction of

meaning in art. In other words, by participating in a play, the spectator gains knowledge

about the workings of the theater, the play, and the playwright. By letting an interactive

participant define his/her own trajectory, action, and juxtapositions, he/she learns









something about the medium itself, as well as what it means to create a work of art in this

medium. The medium is no longer a "natural" device but emerges contextualized into its

institutional, social, and political background. These effects do not occur simply out of

the option to interact with the work, but develop out of a specific type of interaction, one

that is able to penetrate the surface of the presentation.

Introducing opportunities for spectators to interact with an artistic product clearly

represents an important tendency that has an obvious political dimension. It not only

complicates the notions of "author" and "artwork" but also redefines the idea of

"spectatorship." Making a choice, declares interactive filmmaker Graham Weinbren,

involves a moral responsibility. Therefore, for an author to relinquish his/her power to

make all choices involves also giving up the responsibility to represent the world and the

human condition (Manovich 44). In other words, when audiences are allowed to make

choices, a work of art becomes less of a lesson and more of a choice. The didactical

dimension of Brecht's Epic Theater included precisely such decision making.

Interactivity, as Manovich argues, is a confusing term that all to often is defined as

a unique feature of digital media. He points out that interactivity is not necessarily a

concept that relates exclusively to digital practices, but belongs to a wide spectrum of

artistic practice and heritage:

All classical, and even more so modern art, was already "interactive" in a number
of ways. Ellipses in literary narration, missing details of objects in visual art and
other representational "shortcuts" required the user to fill-in the missing
information. Theater, painting and cinema also relied on the techniques of staging,
composition and cinematography to orchestrate viewer's attention over time,
requiring her to focus on different parts of the display. With sculpture and
architecture, the viewer had to move her whole body to experience the spatial
structure. (56)









This complex physical and cognitive interplay between spectator and art was intensified,

continues Manovich, with new narrative techniques, such as film montage, abstraction in

visual art, interactive happenings, as well as performance and installation art (56-57).

Brecht's Epic Theater obviously constitutes another important forerunner to digital

interactive media practices, especially because it often combined cognitive and physical

interactivity into one practice. In S. lhairni ke such as Mother Courage andHer Children

the spectator is not given a figure with whom to identify easily, as Mother Courage

represents a complicated, fluctuating character with changing moral convictions. Each

scene that presents her in a different light requires an adjustment in the audience's

attitude, leading to active interaction with the provoking material. These types of

character complexities are part of Brecht's technique of Verfremdung, which is concerned

with the alienation of the familiar, a process that interrupts the smooth flow of narrative

to prompt the audience to reflect on rather than simply consume what is presented.23 The

audience becomes actively involved with the play by "conjuring up in its own mind other

types of behavior and situations, and, in accordance with the events on stage, will hold

them up in comparison with those presented by the theater. Therefore, the audience itself

turns into a storyteller" (Brecht GW 924).24 In addition to producing alienation through

plot and acting, Brecht interrupted the dramatic action of his h1,(%i I/i[ kA' with songs and




23 This term was first used in an essay in 1936, Brecht used the term Entfremdung in his previous writing.

24 All references to Brecht refer to John Willett's translations in Brecht on Theatre, except when GW is
noted, by which is meant Bertolt Brecht Gesammelte Werke 16 Schriften zum Theater 2. With these
references I will use my own translation. In the original: "Damit auf spielerische Weise das Besondere der
vom Theater vorgebrachten Verhaltungweisen und Situationen herauskommt und kritisiert warden kann,
dichtet das Publikum im Geist andere Verhandlungsweisen und Situationen hinzu und hilt sie, der
Handlung folgend, gegen die vom Theater vorgebrachten. Somit verwandelt sich das Publikum selber in
einen Erzihler."









placards, film projections and other technical devices commenting on the action on stage

rather than repeating or emphasizing its message.

The Lehrstick, however exceeds the S, hai/tu\i k's potential, because it incorporated

interactivity to such a degree that spectator and performer merge as one. Even if the play

did not physically include all spectators in the performance, Brecht involved them in

other ways, such as having the audience complete questionnaires or engage in

discussions, the outcomes of which Brecht used to rewrite the plays (Mueller 32, 38,

106). Again, central to Brecht's epic theory was the idea that interactivity equaled

enjoyment for the participant, "what the spectator, anyway the experienced spectator,

enjoys about art is the making of art, the active creative element" (164). This correlation

between interactivity and entertainment is one of the basic ingredients of the commercial

success of videogames. It is also applied with outstanding results to other areas of arts

and entertainment resulting in hypertext fiction, web design, online museum exhibits,

multi-player online games, Net.art, interactive installations and performances, MUDs

(Multi User Dungeons) and MOOs (Multi User Dungeons Object-Oriented), DVD-

Videos, video (with its instant replay), and pedagogical applications.25 In the latter, the

didactic relevance of interactivity has gained much attention, because learners appear to

respond well to the multi-modal and active approach to learning. Inferring from the

results of a variety of empirical studies involving interactive materials, Larry Friedlander

observes, "this technology invites us to embrace process, to enjoy the journey as much as



25 Thomas Elsaesser argues that interactivity with narratives often means hyperselectivity instead. Due to
limited computing power (in regard to both speed and artificial intelligence) choices are limited and
preprogrammed by the author, therefore espousing a "'you can go wherever you like, so long as I have
been there before'" ("Digital Cinema" 217) logic. However, this is not entirely true for all interactive
narratives, because it does not address those that use algorithms, which make unlimited scenarios possible.









the goal. Because it asks its users to intervene with their own choices and opinions, it can

challenge authority and help deconstruct received, standard forms of knowledge" (174).26

Here, as in Brecht's plays, the importance of process over goals is stressed which

highlights that such materials and practices do not favor dogmatism.

Although trying to reach a wide audience, and therefore incorporating pleasure into

his texts, Brecht avoided dazzling his audience with stage productions that tried to efface

or "naturalize" the tools which were part of the performances. In the S. hmiiiii k, where

he was not able to integrate the spectator physically into the action on stage, he had to

rely on other techniques to achieve his alienation effect (Veif einhu/1geJfj'ki). This effect

is achieved through acts of distanciation, e.g., transferring a familiar event, character, or

technique into an unfamiliar context, and incorporated a variety of epic techniques,

including the use of technology on stage. The purpose of the V-Effekt was to make

audiences question what they saw on stage, to let material appear constructed rather than

natural. The V-Effekt was predominantly accomplished through separating individual

aesthetic and formal elements from one another, e.g., setting off music from speech, film

projections from stage set, acting from being the character, historical events from current

ones, etc. By separating individual elements and interrupting the flow of the presentation,

materials and techniques became visible as constructed (as "unnatural"). Brecht made his

epic tools visible; he created a hyper-mediated environment which the audience was

encouraged to see as such.



26 These interactive learning environments, including Brecht's Epic Theater, are related to principles of
constructivism and constructionism which rely on theories of Dewey, Piaget, and Papert. Constructivism
and constructionism postulate that learners construct meaning by actively engaging with materials, through
building, creating, and reflecting. However, all three behavioral scientists developed their ideas after Brecht
had already formulated some of his basic epic theories.









Hypermediation

In direct opposition to a hyper-presence of mediation, such as in Brecht's case,

stands effacement of the physical world-a simulated reality-made possible via the

disappearance of any mediating agent in interactions with media simulations, virtual

reality objects representing the most dramatic case. This ostensible transparency, which

Bolter and Grusin term "immediacy" affords the viewer or participant a sense of having

an authentic experience. Hypermediacy, in contrast to immediacy, exposes the fact that

all knowledge is transmitted through a medium. Hence the viewer or participant realizes

that her/his experience is transmitted through a filter (70-71). The authors discuss such

concepts of mediation in detail in their book Remediation. Understanding New Media.

Remediation, for Bolter and Grusin, is the act of "representation of one medium in

another" (45).27 However, whereas some media acknowledge their indebtedness to

rivaling forms of representation, others try to present themselves as "pure" and objective

mediators of reality. Remediation describes all media as engaging in a constant

remediation of rivalry media forms, incorporating aspects of each other and

demonstrating their improvements upon one another, that is, their transparency. It is

Bolter and Grusin's categories of hypermediation, which they define as "style of visual

representation whose goal is to remind the viewer of the medium" (272) and immediacy

as a "style [. .] whose goal is to make the viewer forget the presence of the medium and

believe that he is in the presence of the real" (272-3), which I will adapt in my argument

regarding the practice of audience interaction (in its multitude of meanings) with digital



27 When Benjamin emphasizes how Epic Theater, rather than competing against new media, uses these
media to "learn from them, in short to enter into a debate with them" ("The Author 266), he is describing
a principle of remediation.










and non-digital "epic" presentations. However, it is important to establish that Bolter and

Grusin see hypermediacy as just another form of immediacy, a desire to be in the

presence of the real, "by turning it into a fascination with the medium" (122). For

example, in television news broadcasting, giving the viewer visual access to the areas of

production that often remain obscured in cinema, such as camera equipment,

microphones, etc, the viewer is tempted to see the coverage of news as direct access to

real events; because the medium shows its mediating elements it is again immediate in

transmission of knowledge and experience. Video and film also constitute excellent

examples for this theory. While video recordings, in contrast to 35mm film, include tell-

tale signs of the recording medium, such as graininess, unsteadiness of image, and easier

access to hard-to-record sources (only accessible with compact equipment), at the same

time the very fact that the medium exposes itself convinces the viewer that s/he is

accessing the real.28 Likewise, 35mm film, which imitates natural sight, shows its

recorded material ostensibly unmediated and therefore also remediates the real. On the

other hand, the smoothness of transitions, the clarity of image, etc. could also be

interpreted as hyper-stylized, and hence hypermediated, therefore not "real," etc..29 Of



28 With 16mm film, steady-cams, digital film cameras, and other recording technology that blur the formal
and aesthetic boundaries between video and film this comparison becomes less persuasive.

29 While many critics claim that filmmakers employ new media technologies, especially in the form of
digital special effects, primarily to produce mimetic representations of physical reality, I would argue that
this is often not the case. On the contrary, if images can be obtained in physical reality, there is a tendency
to attain them traditionally, that is, through a lens-based recording device and stored on celluloid. Michael
Allen, for example, sites the film Jurassic Park to substantiate this common claim. He asserts, "digital
imaging technologies and techniques are striving to replicate what already exists: the photographic
representation of reality" (110) However, especially in the case of Jurassic Park this motivation for using
digital effects seems doubtful. While filmmakers certainly aim to make there creations seem realistic, they
are not interested in convincing audiences that they are. Dinosaurs are not part of our physical reality nor
will they ever be again (and they probably never existed in the form that they assume in the film either).
This is an accepted fact for filmmaker and audiences alike. This also applies to scenes that are digitally
created or enhanced to show protagonists performing impossible stunts or allow views of catastrophes that
could not be filmed safely from that perspective. What digital technologies make possible in Jurassic Park









course, neither immediacy nor hypermediacy can grant access to an objective, unfettered

reality, because no such state exists. In all cases, with video, television, and film, the

yearning for authentic experiences serves as the foundation for this paradox.

Although this all-encompassing quest for immediacy of all media is hard to

contradict, hypermediacy and immediacy nonetheless operate in degrees and not in

absolutes. Every medium encompasses not only the technological ability to transmit

knowledge and experience but also includes an institutionalized logic that guides its

transmissions. In hypermediacy, it is possible to separate, even if only for the purpose of

critique, the medium from the institution that legitimizes its use in society and, in turn,

approach the result as a moment during which it becomes more likely to make

observations and collect insights concerning the medium's institutional constructedness,

its ideological framework. Whereas immediacy, achieved without hypermediation, sees

the path to the "truth" or the "real" as unfettered and natural, immediacy produced via

hypermediacy displays it as a path with obstacles, and involving an agent (and therefore

agency), thus rendering it much more suspect.30 Therefore, hypermediacy can provide an

opportunity for viewers and participants to penetrate what Enzensberger calls the

"consciousness industry" (only in theory a closed system) which unaided immediacy

cannot.

Enzensberger explains that in order for the consciousness industry to exist four

condition have to be fulfilled: 1) receivers must believe themselves to have an

and other films laden with digital effects is to bring to life the non-existent and fantastic. Digital
technologies are able to expand the vocabulary and arsenal of subject matter used in filmmaking to include
that which cannot exist in physical reality.

30 Foregrounding the medium as a means to achieve hypermediacy is not necessarily meaningful in itself as
was once thought to be true (for example, in certain instances of the French New Wave film practice) as
Nora Alter argues inF *,.. .History.









autonomous mind (in the hypermediacy/immediacy paradox this translates into the

receiver's belief that s/he possesses the capacity to see the real), 2) human rights,

equality, liberty, etc. must be proclaimed (not realized) (this corresponds to the medium's

affirmation [not realization] of providing access to the real), 3) a high standard of

education must be available to all (viewers must have a general media-savvyness that

leads them to believe they have the capacity to separate real from mediated), and 4) a

high level of sophistication in technology must be present (the medium must posses the

tools to be able to bring the real into the viewer's living room) ("Industrialization" 7-9).

Because the consciousness industry feeds off the conditions that allow it to exist,

including critique and awareness of its function and workings, its system is nearly self-

perpetuating and sealed off to interference. Nonetheless, because the industry

incorporates hypermediacy as well as immediacy into its whole it also invites challenges

to its system. Enzensberger explains:

The mind industry has a dynamic of its own which it cannot arrest, and it is not by
chance but by necessity that in this movement there are currents which run contrary
to its present mission of stabilizing the status quo. A corollary of its dialectical
progress is that the mind industry, however closely supervised in its individual
operations, is never completely controllable as a whole. There are always leaks in
it, cracks in the armor; no administration will ever trust it all the way. (13)

To bring Enzensberger's media analysis back into the context of Bolter and Grusin's

observations, it is necessary to identify hypermediacy as the moment where leakage can

occur. It is in hypermediacy that the medium is most vulnerable, because it is exposing its

institutional make-up, its constructedness based on convention, and its desire to reinforce

society's status quo, thus threatening to undermine all four of Enzensberger's conditions.

Let's return for a moment to Brecht's media project and analyze hypermediacy in

the context of Epic Theater. Brechtian theater presentations included materials and









techniques (acts, new media, acting, music, etc.) that were employed very differently

from the Aristotelian theater. Instead of merging elements into the play seamlessly, in

order to create the illusion of being part of a "natural" setting, Brecht opted for a

presentation in which elements drew attention to themselves as artifacts.31 Homogeneity

on stage was replaced by heterogeneity. This heterogeneity made it possible for the

audience and the actors to experience Verfremdung, a crucial step in achieving critical

reception.

The separation of parts was, for one, applied to the play's narrative structure to

achieve a very specific purpose, as Brecht explains:

As we cannot invite the audience to fling itself into the story as it were a river and
let itself be carried vaguely hither and thither, the individual episodes have to be
knotted together in such a way that the knots are easily noticed. The episodes must
not succeed one another indistinguishable but must give us a chance to interpose
our judgment. [. .] The parts of the story have to be carefully set off one against
another by giving each its own structure as a play within the play (201).

In revealing their construction (as individual elements comprising a whole), episodes

allow for the spectator to interject her or himself into the action and interpret the structure

itself as an important component for meaning to emerge. The epic play allows for the

audience to agree as well as disagree with its presentation of events. Additionally, the

hypermediated environment attracts a reading of events beyond the narration itself and

invites instead to include in a reading the conditions for such narration to take place (such

as institutional restraints, genre convention, and ideological goals).

Separation of elements in Epic Theater also applies to the set and its materials. This

Verfremdungs-effect emerges most clearly on the stage of the Lehil %in Ik Technology


31 Brecht's chief criticism of Richard Wagner's Gesamtkunstwerk is based on precisely this concept which
uses the "separation of elements" in Epic Theatre and opposes its formal logic to "the process of fusion" in
the Gesamtkunstwerk (37-38).









played a crucial role in achieving the critical distancing of the Lehrstick performer to the

material that s/he performed. New media, such as film strips and radio, aided in the

alienation of the performer from the subject matter of the play, both during the

performance and afterward. While performing, the actors were confronted by, what

Brecht called "a new, gigantic actor that helped to narrate events, and the stage took up

an attitude itself towards the incidents shown." The new media film and radio, were

treated as separate entities, not simply used to enhance the effect of speech and acting.

The media, exhibited as anthropomorphized elements, produced moments of alienation

for actors and audience.32 Through this technique, the performers were motivated to

critically reflect on the new means of representation. Thus, media, such as film and the

radio, which were used primarily to advance commercial and state interests had been

changed, umfunktioniert, into media able to convey socio-political insights. Film as a

recording device could also be used as a medium for preserving the Lehi ', // k-

performance for later study. This re-experiencing of the material and performance from

an external viewpoint would lead to further critical distance and reflection.

In addition to presenting the parts of the plot and technological devices as separate

elements, Brecht also used a technique of acting and a presentation of music that

achieved Verfremdung. Again, in both cases, Epic Theater would not tolerate immediacy.

The professional as well as amateur performers were trained to expose their distance to

the material they presented rather than to smooth over the boundaries between actor and


32 Samuel Beckett employs this Brechtian anthropomorphizing technique of technology quite literally in his
one-act, one-character play Krapp 's Last Tape. In this play Krapp listens to tapes which he has recorded as
a younger man. The tape-recorder and the cassettes it plays take on the function of an independent
character as the audience cannot reconcile the younger Krapp on the tapes and the man listening to them to
be the same person. Krapp has changed so much, he himself does not recognize the person he once was.
Actor, character, and audience all experienced the tape-recorder and tapes as that Inc\ gigantic actor."









character. Thus, the audience was not encouraged to see the character on stage as a point

for identification. On the contrary, the characters were there to be critically analyzed.

Music and singing were treated similarly. In the case of singing, Brecht demanded a

specific attitude from his performers:

Nothing is more revolting than when the actor pretends not to notice that he has left
the level of plain speech and started to sing. The three levels-plain speech,
heightened speech and singing-must always remain distinct and in no case should
heightened speech represent an intensification of plain speech, or singing of
heightened speech. In no case therefore should singing take place where words are
prevented by excess of feeling. The actor must not only sing but show a man
singing. (44-45)

Accompanying music also had to follow the principle of separation and set itself off from

the action as a commentary on rather than an enhancement of the events portrayed.

In sum, Brecht achieved critical distancing of the audience and actors toward the

performance through viewer participation as well as alienation (Verfremdung).

Verfremdung (through hypermediation) replaced empathy (an element of immediacy), an

audience reaction which belongs to the Aristotelian theater. Both forms of distancing,

alienation and viewer participation, are achieved in the contemporary technologies of

video and digital media through hypermediation as well.

In the case of the most popular branch of the Internet, the World Wide Web,

hypertext is one of the technologies that offers both a distancing of the material through

the intervention of the medium (in the form of separate links, windows, applications) and

through the interaction with and manipulation of the material presented. Gregory Ulmer

notes that "in hypermedia, the scholar does not provide a specific line of argument, an

enunciation, but constructs the whole paradigm of possibilities, the set of statements,

leaving the act of utterance, specific selections and combinations, to the reader/user"

("Grammatology"). This presentation of argument and invitation for interaction deviates









considerably from authors and critics' practices with printed texts. George Landow, in his

important study of hypertext, has pointed out some of the potential political dimensions

of hypertext use. He argues that dominant discourses do not necessarily dominate in

hypertext due to a lack of textual centrality as well as stemming from a marginality in the

organization of material. He remarks: "Hypertext emphasizes that the marginal has as

much to offer as does the central," (89) whereas "linearity of print provides the passage

with an illusory center" (98); a center, of course, is always linked to a position of power,

a center of power. Through its webbed structure, hyperlinks eradicate hierarchies of

meaning. Landow also points out that hypertext promotes the organization of arguments

set up as juxtapositions and using appropriations of other works to supplement one's own

(170-71). In other words, hypertext does not rely on normative argumentation but favors

a dynamic and multi-perspectivist presentation of views.33 This type of argumentation fits

well within the frame of Brecht's theory. Like hypertext, Epic Theater "is essentially

dynamic; its task is to show the world as it changes (and also how it may be changed)"

(Brecht 79), and copyright was never a concern of Brecht's. However, it must be pointed

out that commodification of the Internet is well under way.34 What once served almost

exclusively as a forum for the public (and initially the military) has become a successful

commercial space. Therefore, the potentially democratizing features of hypertextual





33 Hypermediacy is not necessarily a component of computer environments per se. On the contrary,
Friedrich Kittler argues in "There is No Software," that the computer industry is trying hard to disguise
hardware and software to keep the user in the dark about their tools, to "hide a whole machine from its
user" (334). Often, it is at the level of interface, the intersection that connects user to machine, where these
deceptions take place.

34 Enzensberger would argue that critical intervention can only address this issue from within the medium,
by using the medium to subvert its appropriation by capitalism.









application can also be identified as useful vehicles for commercial ventures.35 Apart

from the actual language used on the WWW (e.g., hypertext mark-up language), the

interactivity necessary to navigate this highly mediated space, as well as the

foregrounding of the constructedness of the presentation, making visible its individual

elements and its institutionally (commercial and otherwise) reinforced conventions,

achieves the critical distance, the Verfremdung, that Brecht found "necessary to all

understanding" (71). Hypermediation was, after all, a key feature of Epic Theater as well.

Digital media, in general, can be linked closely to Brecht's technique of separating

elements to achieve hypermediacy in his Epic Theater. As Manovich points out, all

digital objects rely on the logistics of modularity. Media elements, when assembled into a

larger project, retain their separate identity apart from the project. These elements also

have the advantage of being stored separately, therefore are able to be manipulated

without affecting anything else in the meta-project. Even computer programming relies

on modularity, because it is composed of independent, small modules which are

assembled to function as a larger program (30-31).36 This principle can be observed in

any multimedia presentation. For example, in a CD-ROM application, created with

Macromedia Director, which includes sounds, still images, and video-clips, these

individual elements cannot only be accessed separately on the CD (by everyone) but also


35 There are also instances where commercial spaces have been reclaimed as spheres of non-commercial
activity, as Andrew Feenberg points out in Q ,,. ,,,,ni Technology. He calls this a sub\ il\ i
rationalization" of commercial technologies. This act of "democratic technological change" can lead to
genuine subversion. Feenberg cites the Minitel videotext system in France as an example. Viewers
transformed this informational technology into an interactive network. Thanks to the Minitel thousands of
people connect for purposes never intended by its creators, as a source for organizing political protests as
well as for forming sexual connections (cited in Light).

36 However, Manovich also mentions an important difference between the modularity of new media objects
and computer programming. Whereas in the former the independent elements can be removed without
harming the larger structure, in the latter such a removal would crash the program (31).









rearranged, deleted, or otherwise manipulated (provided one has the original file and the

software to do so) without changing any other part of the presentation. The separation of

elements is even more obvious in Web pages, where not only images, sounds, and videos

are separately stored and accessible, but where each page is an individual element as

well, in some cases not even created by the original author but produced by someone else

and presented as an external link.

The Internet and CD-ROMs are not the only media environments that foster

hypermediated interactive experiences. Interactive installations and performances also

make use of these principles. These hypermediated and interactive art forms can trace

their history back at least as far as to Brecht's own time.37 However, it was not until the

1960s that they experienced a surge in artist and audience appeal. The invention of video

and later computer technologies allowed performers to augment their acts and enhance

their installations. These technologies infused performance and installation art with

hypermediation and interactivity simultaneously. The once expected passive role of the

art observer was no longer the dominant position for viewing and experimenting art. In

the realm of literature, an aesthetic practice not usually associated with interactivity,

Roland Barthes had already complicated the notion that the text's meaning resides with

the author alone. Instead a writerlyly" textuality emerges, by which is meant that the

reader does not encounter a work with a set meaning, but rather writes and re-writes the

text through interpretation, which replaces the construct of the "artist as genius," as

3 Kurt Schwitters's Merzbau (1923-1943), also called "The Cathedral of Erotic Misery," constitutes an
early example of an interactive installation. The Merzbau was made up of a combination of collage,
sculpture, and architecture. It began in 1923 with a small construction in a corer of the artist's studio, a
room within his apartment. The project eventually extended over many of the areas of his apartment. He,
his family, and his friends interacted on a daily basis with this construction since it also represented their
living space. Left unfinished when Schwitters fled Hannover in early 1937, the Merzbau was completely
destroyed during an Allied bombing raid in 1943.









creator of the work ("Death").38 This textuality is enhanced by a new "active" form of

spectatorship, but at the same time dependent on the degree and type of interactivity built

into the installation or performance. Nevertheless, these forms of artistic works subvert

the artist's claim of autonomy over her/his creation, once thought to be an integral part of

the artwork. The spectator's interactive experience repositions her/him into the role of co-

creator. As in the Lehli iii kA, spectator and artist/playwright work collaboratively to

complete the artwork/play. For Epic Theater, artistic autonomy was never an issue, any

such claims would have rendered the performance, in the case of the Schauspiel as well

as the Lehli i//A k, innocuous.

Another new media hypermediated space can be found in multi player online game

and chat environments, such as MUDs and MOOs, as well as multi-player computer

games, such as Everquest and Sims Online. Sherry Turkle has performed extensive

research involving these types of role-playing games, especially those involving MUDs.

In her findings she reports that role-playing games, a popular use of MUDs, function as

psychologically constructive vehicles, not just a release from the reality found in the

physical world (as in immediacy) ("Constructions" 358). This is obviously an important

observation, because it stands in stark contrast to common criticisms describing virtual

spaces as harbors of escape from the problems encountered in the world. Turkle's overall

assessment highlights the computer as a medium that provokes negotiations of categories

that usually are experienced as "natural," such as gender, identity, free will, intelligence,

life, etc. (362). It is her assessment finally, that in the hypermediated environments of

MUDs "old questions are raised in new contexts and there is an opportunity for fresh

38 Interestingly, in "The Death of the Author," Barthes explicitly connects his arguments concerning the
diminishing of the author's importance to the text as an act of Brechtian distanciation (145).









resolutions" (364). This recalls Brecht's principle of alienation and his conviction that

subverting conventions can ultimately lead to changing social conditions.

But hypermediacy is also applicable to video and film, albeit in a limited manner.

As already mentioned, video can be used in such a way as to highlight the recording

medium, through motion and resolution. It can also appear embedded in a film and be set

off as separate through its technological specificity. Film, on the other hand, traditionally

works hard to erase its own production process and appear as a reflection of reality. Its

immediacy, however, is dependent on convention, rather than technology. There are

plenty of techniques that can be employed to highlight film's artificial nature. One such

technique is the physical manipulation of film stock to jolt the viewer into acknowledging

the apparatus. Examples for this are Valie Export's The Practice of Love (1984) and

Richard Linklater's Waking Life (2001). In the former, a character within the film text

makes a slashing motion and the director translates this fictional move into a physical

cutting of the film stock where this sequence is stored. In the case of Waking Life a

proprietary software was used to manipulate the images of live-action footage to

transform them into a cartoonish version of the actual recordings. In both cases the

filmmakers do not work i/ ih the medium (technological and institutional make-up,

convention, commodification, etc.) but against it. Although film and video are not classic

examples for hypermediated texts, they are not inherently hostile to hypermediation, but

rather have evolved to be used and regarded as remediating the "real."

The Expressionismus Debatte (in which Brecht took part) in the nineteen thirties

and, in its wake, similar discussions concerning modem culture have as their central









concern artistic expressions and their (im)possibility for intervention in the "real."39 The

original debate, which tried to establish once and for all the function, form and

significance of art within society, has become a hotly debated issue again in the context

of new media forms and technologies. Apart from the continued obsession with the

"real," what connects the inauguration of the last century with that of the present is the

radical transformation of cultural production and representations made possible by new

technologies. Bill Nichols draws on these common characteristics in his essay "The Work

of Culture in the Age of Cybernetic Systems," where he not only connects the art of

reproduction, whether mechanical or digital, to an altered concept of reality, but also to

new identity formations:

My intention, in fact, is to carry Benjamin's inquiry forward and to ask how
cybernetic systems, symbolized by the computer, represent a set of transformations
in our conception of and relation to self and reality of a magnitude commensurate
with the transformations in the conception of and relation to self and reality
wrought by mechanical reproduction and symbolized by the camera. (121)

However, according to Nichols, "the difference between [mechanical and digital

reproduction] is being able to remake the world and being able to efface it" (131), where

the latter has obvious political disadvantages to the former. Although I do not share

Nichols's bleak impressions of digital corollaries in the remainder of the essay, I do

believe that effacement of artificiality is a problem that must be reckoned with in any

digital representation (simulation), hence my argument that hypermediation has more

potential as a critical stimulant.40


39 See footnote 1 for details on this debate.
40 Nichols updates Enzensberger's consciousness industry thesis from 30 years earlier (without mentioning
him, however) to the age of cybernetics when he states that "just as the mechanical reproduction of copies
revealed the power of industrial capitalism to reorganize and reassemble the world around us, rendering it
as commodity art, the automated intelligence of chips reveals the power of postindustrial capitalism to
simulate and replace the world around us, rendering not only its exterior realm but also its interior ones of









Brechtian Theory and Recent Developments in the Public Sphere

While Brechtian techniques, implementing interactivity and hypermediacy into

Epic Theory, are particularly important to any epic practice in the realm of contemporary

technology, his attempts at transforming the public sphere with his aesthetic practice

must also be regarded as a forerunner for contemporary practices. The notion of a public

sphere as a formative space for communicative exchanges in society can be used to

follow a particularly dynamic history within the German context. In Strukturwandel der

Offentlichkeit, Jirgen Habermas traces the formation of a "public sphere"

(Offentlichkeit), a utopian space independent of state, commercial interests, and the realm

of the immediate family, to the eighteenth century European Enlightenment project. This

sphere, in theory, would grant access to all citizens (at least those that are white and

male) who would in turn honor and further the principles of open rational debate, work

toward the welfare of the public, and ensure equality for all participants. In the eighteenth

century, according to Habermas, the newspapers (along with salons, literary societies,

and discussion groups) were the primary spaces for the realization of Offentlichkeit.

However, today a combination of media, such as newspapers, magazines, radio, and

television have taken the once uncontested place of the newspaper press to construct a

20th-century public sphere. According to Habermas, this has had devastating effects on

the public sphere project because rather than realizing the above named principles, the

new media are corrupted by commercial and state interests and thus no longer function

consciousness, intelligence, thought and intersubjectivity as commodity experience" (131). Although he
does not address the role of the critic of such a system as a potential violator of the system's logic, he still
sees a chance "to transgress its predefined interdiction and limits, using the dynamite of the apperceptive
powers it has itself brought into being" (143) (just as Enzensberger does in "Industrialisation"), but does
not comment on who or what the agent in such an explosion might be. Another interesting aspect of
Nichols's analysis is his hypothesis that the preservation and propagation of ideology has in the digital age
primarily shifted to the judicial apparatus.









independently from such influences. For Habermas, this corruption has led to a

"refeudalization" (233) (a state prior to Enlightenment) of the public sphere, therefore

reflecting public authority but not truly representing it. Habermas would like to return to

the Enlightenment project ideal of Offentlichkeit, but rather than having individuals

representing themselves he proposes that those individuals form organizations of

democratically structured interest groups (such as political parties, or civil organizations).

In an effort to update Habermas's concept of the public sphere to better fit into an

age of mass media and media convergences, Oskar Negt and Alexander Kluge published

their Public Sphere and Experience (1972), ten years after Habermas's Strukturwandel.

Their thesis of the public sphere is based upon what they see as its primary material, the

concept of experience. However, experience is not a product of individuals but something

that can only emerge as a "cooperative action" (52) resulting from public discussions.

Therefore, the public sphere simultaneously represents the space where experience is

gathered and needs this experience in order to function. If this circle cannot be

completed, the public sphere becomes an empty and useless space. Negt and Kluge

further argue that Habermas's bourgeois public sphere operated on a principle of

exclusion and separation (it was only accessible to certain social groups and split

categories that are culturally intermeshed) and set forth the notion of a more inclusive and

fluent public sphere (or multiple spheres). Private experience is now part of the public

domain. The public sphere should be analyzed according to the degree and type of social

experience that is included in it. This experience can either be put to use as fuel for the

dominant powers that shape the public sphere or become a liberating power within its

reign.









Negt and Kluge's study was unquestionably informed by Brecht's ideas on the

shaping of a public sphere. As Mueller remarks:

When Brecht embarked on the "sociological experiment," the public trial over the
filming of his Threepenny Opera, he was fixing a moment in the process of shifting
public spheres, a moment in which we can see the "public spheres of production" in
the making. At the same time, Brecht was keen on exposing the ideal categories of
the classical bourgeois public sphere as ideology. (122-3)

In exposing the ideological backbone of the bourgeois public sphere, Brecht's theory set

itself apart from the Habermasian project and aligns itself more closely with Negt and

Kluge's ideas. For Brecht, as for Negt and Kluge, it was imperative "to wrest the means

of communication from the apparatus and place it in the hands of the artists themselves"

(123).41

In our current state of technology the public sphere has been changed dramatically

yet again. In addition to film and television, there are other media vying to take their

place among constituents of the public sphere, such as video, the Internet, and various

new technologies of distribution. Collectively, they can no longer describe a coherent,

homogenous public sphere. Instead, each one incorporates and often exposes freely the

different ideological practices in its make-up and is used in a myriad of ways, both to

strengthen and undermine dominant discourses. Video is the most obvious example of a

seemingly democratizing medium, in a position to open up the public sphere to various

groups and individuals (for example, in the form of guerilla television). In the early years

of video proliferation, its potential, based on the medium's versatility and low cost, was

seen as a way to turn everyone into an artist, in a true Brechtian and Benjaminian sense,

and thus create an alternative public sphere which could counteract the dominant one.

41 Kluge does this in his television shows that categorically subvert all categories set up by dominant
television practice and commercial interests. See chapter 3 for a more detailed account of these programs.









Unfortunately, these utopian ideals never came to pass, although various promising

attempts were made (see chapter 3). Presently, digital video is in the process of replacing

analog video almost completely. Whether this new medium will be able to fulfill the

promise of its predecessor is not yet clear.

The various computer technologies, including digital video, incorporate some very

interesting prospects for a changed public sphere. As Lunenfeld points out, "the computer

becomes an instrument unique in the history of audiovisual media-for the first time the

same machine serves as the site of production, distribution and reception" (71). Implicit

in this statement is the notion that computers make it possible to collapse several public

and private domains into the same physical but also cultural sphere. Digital cultural

artifacts are often created in a private setting, then distributed through a network that can

neither be defined clearly as private nor public nor wholly commercial (the Internet).

They finally arrive, again, in the same private setting in which they originated without

having undergone much in the way of institutional manipulation. A good example for this

kind of slippery cultural exchange is the peer-to-peer file-sharing service Kazaa. With the

help of Kazaa millions of people trade files with a myriad of contents, including music,

videos, images, recordings of lectures, e-books, and a wide variety of digital curiosities.

Although Kazaa is a commercial enterprise itself, it subverts all conventional categories

of pecuniary systems since it allows its users to share copyrighted materials rather than

purchase and sell the items. It also allows groups and individuals to trade their personal

recordings and therefore circumvent traditionally set up cultural and commercial spheres.

These cultural and commercial systems, now part of the public sphere, often permit only

a limited amount of material to enter into their ranks and admit only those which support,









not undermine, its internal structure. Kazaa has more than 60 million users around the

world, and its users share over 15 million files a month (Woody). Also, Kazaa is only one

of several peer-to-peer file sharing services, increasing the total number of shared files by

multiples of 10-100. However, commercial forces are working hard to undermine the

success of such public services.42 Napster, a similar file sharing utility which operated

based on a different technical principle (it indexed songs on its own server rather than

simply acting as a node connecting users in the Kazaa fashion), was shut down by courts

in 2000 based on charges of copyright infringements.

In the cornucopia of new media there exist plenty more examples for practices that

complicate the conceptualization of the public sphere for our contemporary society.

These include practices that I have already mentioned throughout this chapters, which

incorporate interactivity and hypermediacy into their logic. Brecht was an important

precursor for the expansion of the public sphere to include alternate practices that

undermine dominant ideology.

Conclusion: Brecht after Brecht-Continuations and Transgressions

Brecht's media theory has survived a myriad of technical advancements and has

been called upon as fuel for disparate media movements. A detailed account of this

continuing Brechtian legacy is given elsewhere, a brief summary of the major points will

therefore suffice.43 In the 1960s and 1970s, Brecht's theories were not only adapted to

theater productions but also became infused into film criticism. Brecht was particularly


42 In Kazaa's case it is particularly difficult to make a legal case stick, because the company is as
decentralized as its service. Its servers are located in Denmark, the software in Estonia, the domain is
registered in Australia, and the corporation itself is housed on an island in the South Pacific (Woody).

43 Mueller gives a thorough account of Brechtian influences on various national and historical scenes. She
describes the case of France, Britain, and Germany up to the 1980s in detail.









influential for the French New Wave movement, most notably for Jean-Luc Godard, and

defined a line of film criticism that bore fruit in the British film journal Screen

(predominantly through Colin MacCabe, Stephen Heath, and Ben Brewster).44 This latter

development led to a contentious debate whether it was in sync with a Brechtian

approach to infuse Freudian/Lacanian psychoanalysis into the mix. Mueller notes that it

was predominantly the confusion of terminology, in particular the confusing use of the

term "separation" with its opposing meanings in Brechtian and Lacanian theories, which

fueled the debate (112, 114). Other British critics, such as Martin Walsh, used Brechtian

ideas to develop a theory of counter-cinema. In the context of German artistic

development, Brecht had the most impact on the New German Cinema movement. As

Mueller remarks: "Formally, Brecht is ubiquitous in New German Cinema" (123). The

most obvious examples for Brechtian cinema are the films of Alexander Kluge and

Rainer Werner Fassbinder. Although the legacy of Brecht's work weaves itself through

several different national contexts, what all of the critics and filmmakers who have built

this legacy share is their enthusiasm for an artistic and theoretical practice that has burst

through its own historical and national specificity. Turkle, author of several works

dealing with new media, points out that certain theories, for example, psychoanalysis,

have a degree of "appropriability," which allows people to adapt them as "an object to

think with" and about issues that concern culture at large (Psychoanalytic xxvi). I agree

with this claim and contend that this can also be applied to Brecht's Epic Theater. So far

44 MacCabe more or less initiated this debate with his article "Realism and the Cinema: Notes on Some
Brechtian Theses," published by the filmjournal Screen in 1974. In this article he drew on the ideas of the
Bertolt Brecht to develop "a critique of the relationship between narrative systems, discursive hierarchies,
and the reproduction of dominant ideology" (52). He focused on the structure of what he called "the classic
realist text" which uses a metalanguage, void of contradictions, and supportive of dominant ideology, and
denies its own status as mediating reality. These devices of epistemic privileging subdued any attempt of
active, critical spectatorship.









Brecht has only been adapted to act in the service of film and radio theory, but I believe

other areas of cultural and aesthetic productions can also benefit from his theories.

As I have demonstrated, there exist a number of mediated spaces in the cornucopia

of digital and analog worlds where Brechtian tactics of alienation, interaction, and

construction can lead to productive interactive experiences and their assessments.

Although most of Brecht's theoretical writings are concerned with the artistic practices of

the stage, he also applied his epic strategies to other media such as radio and film. I am

following this approach in my attempt to formulate a general media theory that takes

Brecht as its point of departure. However, I do not propose utilizing Brecht's specific

techniques of his Epic Theater and adapting them without mutation to the new media

discussed in this study. The new technologies have made certain techniques obsolete. The

theater represents a very distinct medium with technological and institutional

particularities and therefore resists certain analogies with the cinema and other media

institutions. Adapting epic strategies also necessarily involves recontextualizing Brecht's

specific methods into the changed socio-political and economic background of the late

20th and beginning 21st century. Although there is a perceptible correlation between

Brecht's and the current time period, especially in terms of technological developments,

other corresponding categories do not fit as neatly. Therefore it is not only important to

adapt Brecht's theater methods to fit other media but it is also important to update his

theory to correlate with the contemporary historical context.

The examples in the following chapters, mainly Wenders, Tykwer, and Export, all

illustrate some of the Brechtian ideas explained above-on the level of the works

themselves as well as in the applied criticism. The new and old media objects on which I









focus my attention sustain a tradition of formal considerations that are clearly linked to

Brecht's experiment launched in the last century. New media, and old media which

incorporate the new, therefore are not as "new" as one might expect, they continue an

aesthetic, social, and political trajectory instituted by predecessors. Nonetheless, the

specific outcomes of certain media experimentation are far from identical to those

initiated in the Brechtian "laboratory." Brecht himself foresaw this when he commented:

So is this new style of production the new style; is it a complete and
comprehensible technique, the final result of every experiment? Answer: no. It is a
way, the one we have followed. The effort must be continued. The problem holds
for all art, and it is a vast one. The solution here aimed at is only one of the
conceivable solutions to the problem [. .]. (135)

Neither does a specific Brechtian political attitude survive the "transliteration." All media

types and media combinations must be evaluated separately and ideological tendencies

situated into the appropriate historical and institutional context, for creative media

employment and alliances often lead to unexpected results.

In many ways the examples' deviations with respect to Brecht's theory and practice

can also lead to important insights into the historical, social, and political specificity of

art objects and their function in society. The lack of overt political messages in Run Lola

Run, the dogmatic use of images as political message in Wim Wenders films, and the

specific type of politics espoused in Export's CD-ROM are the most obvious example of

this. Each of these texts speaks to a different audience and adopts a particular type of new

technology, in accordance with the technology's suitability to accomplish specific tasks,

to support its message. Wenders uses video in order to continue his directorial tradition of

independent, "high brow" filmmaking. Tykwer chooses the videogame to open up filmic

conventions, because his project is firmly grounded in popular culture and addresses a

popular audience. Export opts for the CD-ROM, because this medium is most suited to









her feminist, avant-garde affinity. As becomes apparent, in each of these cases, it is not

only the medium that encompasses a specific historical continuity, but also the filmmaker

and artist who carries on his or her own tradition. This somewhat counteracts the

assumption that using new technological devices to affect old media has the ability to

shake things up dramatically. Nonetheless, Tykwer, Wenders, and Export, among others

embark on intriguing experimentation which can yield insights into structures, potential,

interaction, and limitations of new media. These insights do not necessarily emerge from

the filmmaker's productive implementation of new media into their projects, but can

result conversely from perceived shortcomings in the practical applications and/or

theoretical underpinnings.














CHAPTER 3
VIDEO AND FILM

For the old forms of communication are not unaffected by the development of new
ones, nor do they survive alongside of them. The filmgoer develops a different way
of reading stories. But the man who writes the stories is a filmgoer too.

Bertolt Brecht, Brecht on Theatre

The Emergence and Development of Video as an Artistic Medium

Video and Television

Video, like other 20th century imaging technologies, emerged as a war-related

medium soon after 1945 and was used initially to radio-control planes and aircraft

carriers (Virilio "Interview" 324). It entered mainstream culture via broadcast television

in the fifties and sixties, and became a popular storage and recording device (to be played

on a VCR) during the seventies and early eighties. From its inception, video offered an

effective expressive tool to political activists, and it slowly infiltrated the art scene and

museums in the form or as part of experimental, avant-garde, installation, and

performance art. In the early eighties video technology single-handedly changed the

entire pornography industry by making x-rated films accessible-in terms of both

production and distribution-to a much larger number of people than ever before; porn-

films moved from seedy, relatively high-profile, and crime-infested inner city sites into

the suburban living room. There are even some who argue that JVC's VHS video tapes

eventually won the format war against Sony's Betamax because the latter's tight









licensing control shifted the pornography business to VHS-tapes (Kohn cited by

Krochmal).1

In the course of its multi-faceted history, video has been implemented as an artistic

medium in the "war" against dominant cultural establishments (such as institutionalized

art movements, museums, and sources of funding). It has served as a counter-broadcast-

television medium on the one hand, and as a testing ground for (semi- and non-)

commercial television program content and direction on the other. Video has also

supplied additional advertising venues for cultural products (e.g., as music videos,

infomercials on tape, how-to product accompaniments, travel and tourism videos, etc.).

Video technology has been implemented in the areas of law enforcement, private

property protection and monitoring of persons, evolving, over time, into the

quintessential surveillance apparatus. However, it is when employed as the raw materials

for broadcast, cable and satellite television programming, that video demonstrates its full

potential. Television, a mass medium and powerful cultural institution since the 1950s,

exerts its influence on almost all areas of modern life, on art, entertainment, politics,

education, information, fashion, economics, and culture in general. The impact of

television programming on everyday lives cannot be underestimated. Indeed its

preeminence is attested by the fact that most families and individuals in industrialized

countries own and operate at least one (often more) television set in their homes (in fact,

there are more TV-sets in operation then there are telephones [Peters 1]).

In 1935, the first television service (utilizing 25 frames per second and 180-lines

per frame resolution) was inaugurated by the city of Berlin. Images were produced on


1 For a more detailed account of the history of the videotape see Eugene Marlow and Eugene Secunda's
1, i,,i- Time and Space: The Story of Videotape.









film then scanned in using a rotary disk. Shortly thereafter a new electronic camera was

developed, the iconoscope invented by Vladimir Zworykin and built by Telefunken,

which was able to capture outdoor imagery (Peters 11). Hitler's resourceful, media-savvy

propaganda machine put the new medium television to effective use for transmission of

the 1936 Berlin Olympic Games. The city even built special viewing locales, called

Fernsehstuben, to enable the public to take part in this event (13).2 However, it was not

until many years later that programs could be transmitted into the domestic sphere of the

living room and received by a large number of viewers.

Television began to incorporate video into its formal and institutional organization

in the mid-1950s. Before video became a technological viability, film constituted the only

medium with which television broadcasts could be recorded. Magnetic tape, already in

use for sound, started to interest American television developers who were faced with a

geographic dilemma since they were trying to broadcast live shows to an audience across

a spectrum of several time zones. In 1956, Ampex developed the first black and white

video recording system, soon to be followed by a color system made by RCA. These new

systems quickly evolved to expand their function of delaying broadcasts to incorporate

editing and other production purposes. The first all-electronic editing apparatus,

introduced in the late 1960s, made physical splicing of tape obsolete. Helical-scan

recorders (1959) enabled the use of slow motion and variable speed playback as well as

other film-like editing techniques (26-27).3 Video technology had a profound effect on



2 The verb fernsehen was first used by the German physicist Eduard Liesegang in 1890 (Peters 6).
3 Television special effects use electronic rather than chemical or optical techniques as is the case in film. A
rapid electronic switch controlled by color variations (also called chroma-key technique) operates while
two images are being scanned (Peters 27). The advent of digital television production has naturally changed
the editing tools and techniques employed in television and transferred the process to the computer.










almost every aspect of television's output capabilities, acutely affecting program content

and broadcasting times. Presumably, television could never have aspired to reach its by

now axiomatic cultural significance without video recording technologies.

Considering video's impressive vita, it is not surprising that it (especially in the

form of television) has provided the focus of much critical discourse in the last fifty

years.4 It goes beyond the scope and purpose of this chapter to comprehensively trace and

explain the different attitudes of critics toward this medium over the years or chronicle

video's diverse production palette. Instead, I will limit myself to citing and relying on

critical observations and examples of specific relevance to selective artistic roots of video

leading to or hindering the complex relationship this medium maintains with its cousin

film (to which it is related in terms of cultural significance but not necessarily through its

technological make-up).



4 Most of the critical television discourse (in both senses of analytics and negativity) feeds on anxieties of
potential political misrepresentation in programming and/or interference with and manipulation of cultural
practices. Some of the most influential early critical voices concerning television practices, both positive
and negative, have been McLuhan, Williams, Hall, Fiske, and Ellis. In 1964 Marshall McLuhan devotes a
chapter in his Understanding Media to television calling it "the timid giant." In his analysis he determines
it to be a "cool medium," meaning it favored viewer involvement and participation (unlike many later
theories which tended to see it as a medium which causes viewer passivity). McLuhan's theory was
somewhat ahead of its time, because it focused on the medium itself, discrete from its content, but this also
infused a certain amount of technological determinism into his ideas. Apart from McLuhan, television as a
distinctive medium, did not begin to receive serious scholarly attention until the 1970s. Stuart Hall's
"Encoding and Decoding" (1973) and Raymond Williams Television: Technology and Cultural Form
(1974) rank among the most influential early theories on the subject. Basing their positions on Marxist
cultural theory, Williams and Hall are both concerned with television's ideological message and role in
mass society. Williams focuses on television's public aspect as a key component of a potentially
democratic medium of communication. He also develops the concept of flo\" (as opposed to cinema's
sequence of discrete units) which figures prominently in several later television studies. Hall reflects on the
audience's decoding of the television message which either coincides fully, partially, or not at all with the
program's intended message, and viewers can therefore legitimize hegemony or potentially subvert it. In
the 1980s, two important works theorizing television were John Fiske's Television Culture (1987) and John
Ellis's "Broadcast TV Narration" in Visible Fictions: Cinema, Television, Video (1982). The former
highlights TV's semiotic system of meaning, its status within popular and mass culture, and its function as
a commodity in capitalist society, whereas the latter focuses on television's modes of narration which are
primarily dependent on its particular institutional and material nature. For a systematic and general
overview of the most important ideas in television studies see John Corner's Critical Ideas in Television
Studies (1999).









Although video art (mostly disassociated from commercial venues) has existed for

at least four decades since Nam June Paik's recording of the Pope's visit in the US in

1963 (the mythical inauguration event), until recently, it has been perceived by many

artists and art critics alike as located somewhere "on the fringes of the art world" and

always in need of "defining itself against and in spite of the overwhelming presence of

television" (Sturken 102). Art on video has been suffering since its inception from

associations with commercial television. Kathy Rae Huffman points out that although

there were several experiments attempting to adapt broadcast television as an artistic

medium, its unsavory connection to mass entertainment and ties to commercial interests

diminished its appeal to artists (81).5 Nam June Paik, often credited for introducing video

to the art scene, was an exception. He not only created some of the most acclaimed

artistic videos but also used television images to enhance his performance pieces as one

of the first and only artists to experiment with broadcast TV.6 Rather than television

failing as an aesthetic medium due to its technological abilities, it was mostly the lack of

financial and institutional funding which inhibited fruitful combinations of video art and

TV. In the early seventies, Paik's broadcast entitled Video Commune-The Beatlesfrom

Beginning to End served as convincing evidence to document the aesthetic possibilities as

well as freedom and openness to experimentation that television can support given

generous funding (Huffman 84). This is not to say that Paik championed television in an



5 Some examples of experiments in the US were led by Boston's public television station WGBH and
producer Fred Barzyk ("The Medium is the Medium") as well as the San Francisco's KQED Center for
Experiments in Television (in the mid-sixties), WNET in New York (in the early seventies), KTCA in
Minneapolis (in the early eighties). In Germany, RTL, a commercial station provided a venue for video art
on mainstream TV with the show "Kunstkanal." However, the show did not run for long due to financial
concerns.
6 Curiously, the first video art displayed at the Metropolitan Museum of Art in New York, however, was
not by Nam June Paik, but "Projects: Bill Viola" by Bill Viola in 1979.










exclusively positive light. In the 1960s and 70s he produced several pieces which directly

(even physically) assaulted television as an apparatus. Paik altered the circuitry of a TV-

set to display a single horizontal line, warped TV images by placing a magnet on the set,

and gutted a TV casing, replacing the picture tube with a candle.

Yet, it was not only video art that engaged in a struggle against the hegemonic

qualities of commercial television. Videos employed in the service of political activism

also benefited from and achieved some of their critical momentum from a similar strife.8

Because video technology was relatively affordable, easy to operate, and portable enough

to move around comfortably, it inspired the undertaking of many independent projects.

Marita Sturken observes that video's early years are often remembered as a time "when

freedom of the spirit abounded, when artists and activists discovered a new medium and

took to the streets with it, assured that their 'guerilla' tactics would ultimately change

television" (106). But activist video recordings could reach a much greater audience

when employing television as a delivery apparatus and thus "guerilla television" was

born.9 Video art and activism collaborated with and critically confronted television-the

television/video relationship was both too close for comfort and concurrently a creative

well for artists and activists.


7 Paik's first solo exhibition in 1963, Exposition of Music-Electronic Television, at the Galerie Parnass in
Wuppertal, Germany featured his early experimentation with television.
8 This is not to say that this trend is obsolete today. Paper Tiger Television, for example, although not
strictly conceptualized as a medium for political activism, but certainly containing political content, uses a
highly self-reflexive style in its own struggle to offer an alternative to mainstream TV. Broadcasting
television shows since the early eighties, it defines itself as a "public access TV show" which "looks at the
communications industry via the media in all of their forms" and leads an "investigation into the corporate
structures of the media and critical analysis of their content [as] one way to demystify the information
industry" (About Paper Tiger). Paper Tiger Television appears weekly on a Manhattan public access
channel and covers a wide variety of topics.
9 Sturken defines guerilla television as a political protest medium, an instrument which allows activists to
point out the foolishness of society and/or a tool to establish an alternative in form and content to
commercial television (107-8).









Gregory Ulmer correctly notes in Teletheory that television and video are

intimately coupled because the former can be thought of "as the name for the institution

that has arisen to manage and distribute the medium of video" (x). However, video art in

particular has come to be institutionalized by museums. According to art historian Martha

Rosler, the "museumization" of video art has over time successfully split the medium

from any association with broadcast television (33).10 Again, video art is not somehow

inherently adversarial to television technology, rather concerns related to artistic

autonomy encouraged the split. Deregulation and privatization in the US but also in many

European countries, beginning in the 1980s and culminating in the 1990s, transformed

television into a commercial venue of unequaled proportion. This development has

further entrenched attitudes that view television as "guilty by association" and always

suspect whenever program content is in question.1l Furthermore, as Huffman explains,

the shift from early experimentation on public TV stations to the museumization of video

occurred in the 1980s when media art centers, supported by outside funding, became a

more attractive workplace to video artists because of high-tech equipment availability

and the lack of commercial pressures (88). The videotapes produced in such centers

eventually ended up in museums and artist-created exhibition spaces rather than on the





10 In spite of this "museumization" process, video was originally conceived by many artists as an
appropriate artistic medium to be used to attack established institutions such as museums and galleries,
because, as Frank Gillette has noted: "Video was the solution because it had no tradition. It was the precise
opposite of painting" (quoted in Sturken 107).
1 This critique is not without its merits. A TV-commercial certainly contains and cultivates a specific type
of relationship with the program it is interrupting, as do station trailers and other intersegments. Television
program content organizes itself around the interruptions, incorporating them into narrative structure, plot,
even setting, and flow. Conversely, advertisements are designed to appeal to the target audience of the
program into which they are spliced. Often, commercials utilize similar content, rhythm, style, and actors
as the main show.









air where artists had to contend with greater restrictions on form and content of their

material.12

While reluctantly infiltrating mainstream "high-brow" art, video concurrently

turned to film for inspiration.13 Most obvious was the application of film experience,

technique and genres to this new medium.14 In Europe, Jean-Luc Godard was one of the

first filmmakers to adopt video as an artistic medium. According to Thomas Elsaesser, it

was mainly video's economical and compact recording technology that led Godard to

regard it as a proper medium for avant-garde and independent productions ("Cinema

Futures" 10). Godard's acceptance of this emerging medium as an image-making

technology allowed him to subvert the image-producing dominance of mainstream

cinema, avoid commercialized avenues of filmmaking and consequently remain an

autonomous and experimental director. Other European artists soon followed Godard's

example and video slowly penetrated domains in which cinema once ruled supremely: the

production of fictional entertainment.15 In Germany, several artists created the first

fiction "videofilms" in the early eighties, such as Neonschatten (1980) by Marco Serafini,

Zeichen und Wunder (1981) by Niklaus Schilling and Der tiefe Spiegel (1982) by

Michael Feick (1982). In 1983, Bundschuh and Bauer shot Deja vu oder die gelbuitligie

Geliebte entirely on video. Apart from using this new material to keep the costs at a



12 In Germany, two of the most successful workshops were Die Medienoperative Berlin (mob) (founded in
1977) and Medienwerkstatt Freiburg (founded in 1978). Both produced political activist videos (Roth 213).
13 The reverse is also true. Timothy Corrigan has pointed out, for example, that certain cinematic
developments, such as the promotion of blockbuster films, had an instrumental influence upon VCRs as
well as satellite and cable television (26).
14 Video as a medium also served as the main theme for several high-budget and independently produced
Hollywood films, e.g., Videodrome (1983), Tapeheads (1988) Sex, Lies and Videotape (1989), The Blair
Witch Project (1999), Camera (2000), 15 Minutes (2001), The Ring (2002), etc.
15 Non-fiction videos by filmmakers such as Harun Farocki emerged in the early 1970s.









minimum, these two artists also employed video on the level of plot (the videofilm tells

the story of a man who constructs himself a new reality with the help of his home video

system) and integrated its technology into their aesthetical approach.

In Germany, a particularly productive relationship developed between state-

subsidized television (offentlich-rechtliche Anstalten) and the emerging creative

explosion of the New German Cinema movement; this association had significant

influence on the latter's success. Virtually all films produced by New German Cinema

directors in the seventies and eighties were at least in part financed by television stations

such as the WDR (Westdeutscher Rundfunk), the ZDF (Zweites Deutsches Fernsehen),

ARD (Allgemeiner Rundfunk Deutschlands), NDR (Norddeutscher Rundfunk), SWF

(Sudwestfunk), etc. These films were seen by more people on television (either via

broadcast, cable, satellite or on videotapes) than on theater screens. Wim Wenders is an

excellent case in point because not only were all of his films financially supported by TV

stations, he was also one of the first New German Cinema directors to take advantage of

videotapes as a commercial distribution apparatus for his films (Alter 125). Wenders also

continued his highly prolific relationship with television after the dissipation of New

German Cinema as a distinct artistic movement; he accepted television funding and

experimented in his films with traditional and digital video technologies such as HDTV,

which were, as the name implies, originally conceptualized to serve television, not the

film industry.

In what follows, I explore how Wenders's relationship with technological

innovations have influenced his filmmaking practices in general and films in specific.

Although there have been other critical studies of Wenders's aesthetic treatment of and









artistic relationship with video, most notably Martin Baier's Film, Video undHDTV

(1996) and "Global Politics, Cinematographic Space: Wenders's Tokyo-Ga and

Notebooks on Cities and Chahew," in Nora Alter's Projecting History (2002), my account

departs from or augments them in several ways. Baier examines Wenders

experimentation with new recording techniques in Nick's Film, Notebooks of Cities and

Clothes, and Until the End of the World within the context of his entire filmic output of

the last three decades in order to show that these films fit into the filmmakers' oeuvre

overall. This chapter, in contrast, has no such ambitions. On the contrary, I argue that

Wenders allows his preoccupation with remaining at the forefront of what is

technologically possible in filmmaking to impede upon the quality of work which he is

otherwise capable of producing. Also, Baier does not pay attention to the formal

specifications of the media which Wenders employs, but concentrates on the overall

aesthetic product instead. Indeed, he conflates analog video with digital video technology

in his investigation, stating that the latter is merely an improvement upon the former

technology, whereas my study makes a clear distinction between the two and treats them

as separate technologies altogether. Finally, I also add a treatment of The End of Violence

(1997) and mention several other films and practices that are dated after the publication

date of Baier's Film, Video, andHDTV, for Wenders an important period of time,

because it launches him into a completely new relationship with video technology. My

approach to Wenders's experimentation with recording technologies departs from

Alter's Projecting History in that I concentrate predominantly on Wenders's feature films

and his use of HDTV, whereas Alter focuses on Wenders's non-fiction productions and









situates the technology (principally analog) into the specific context of the essay film and

German history.

HDTV

In 1990 Wenders began to experiment with a new recording technology that was

originally developed in Japan. NHK, the Japanese public broadcast television station,

started to pursue research on HDTV in 1964 and active development of the technology

began in the mid-seventies. But only recently has it advanced as a technology that may

soon make most consumer TVs, VCRs, and non-digital professional video equipment

obsolete. What sets HDTV and high-definition video apart from their conventional

standard definition counterparts is not only restricted to resolution as implied by the

name. In addition to HDTV's increased number of luminance picture elements, about 2

Million pixels per frame in 1125 scanning lines, roughly 6 times the resolution of NTSC

(the standard video format for the US) and four times the sharpness of PAL (the

European standard), it also features a wide-screen aspect ratio of approximately 16:9

(compared to 4:3 for NTSC and PAL), a picture that is almost free of distortion and

interference (common problems with analog technologies), and makes interactive

programs possible. Additionally, HDTV lowers production, post-production, distribution,

and storage costs. Although high definition video is closely aligned with film stock

regarding image quality and aspect ratio, it is a much cheaper production and post-

production material in comparison. There are no costs for film prints (ca. $2000 per print)

if projection is done digitally, because there exists no negative. Also, HD tape is much

cheaper to use than traditional film stock. A fifty-minute tape for the Sony HDW-F900

camera only costs about $65 versus thousands of dollars for film stock of the same

capacity (including processing). Moreover, editing and special effects become more cost-









effective due to the efficient manipulation of binary code on the computer. There are also

cost-cutting features associated with the prolonged shelf life of the digital format in

archives.

Although high-definition technology has only in the nineties become a widely

known technology, its was unveiled by Japanese electronics companies to industries

outside of the country in the early 1980s. In the mid-1980s a considerate effort was

launched to develop international television standards mainly concerned with the rate of

scanning lines. However, North American, Japanese, and European governments could

not agree on a universal standard. Joseph Flaherty explains that the Europeans, for one,

worried that Japanese products would flood the market and ruin the domestic industry if

they agreed upon a world-wide standard. They even went so far as to launch and fund

research on a strictly European standard, the Eureka project, which would enable the

European electronics industry to catch up and eventually monopolize the internal market.

European efforts to design their own technical conventions reached a climactic level in

1986 at the ITU (International Telecommunication Union) Plenary in Dubrovnik when

standards proposed by American and Japanese developers were rejected. Eventually,

however, the European industry abandoned the Eureka project and renewed efforts to

devise an international common image format began to take shape. Finally, between 1999

and 2000, Study Group II of the ITU composed and adopted "Recommendation ITU-R

BT. 709-3," entitled "Parameter Values for the HDTV Standards for Production and

Program Exchange." This treatise defines common parameter values for the HDTV

image with a fluctuating picture rate that adjusts in order to accommodate different

applications (Flaherty). Almost three decades after designs for high-definition television









first circulated in Japan, a common standard, based on NHK technology, has finally made

it possible to produce affordable equipment which can record, manipulate and distribute

HDTV recordings on a worldwide scale.16 Recently, high-definition equipment such as

the Sony HDW-F900 (with Panasonic lenses) received international exposure and

attention, because it was used as the main camera to record the blockbuster Star Wars

Episode 2: Attack of the Clones (2002).

The process of producing films for cinema projection with digital video such as

HDTV is at first glance not as complicated and different from conventional film

production as one may expect. Camera operators still record images in a fashion similar

to conventional techniques, albeit with different equipment. While the new technology

does not require much in the way of innovation in mise-en-scene composition, certain

digital video peculiarities such as lighting and color schemes have to be taken into

consideration. Important differences come into play while and after the recording

process. Digital equipment is often relatively compact and easy to handle enabling the

film crew to produce a series of images through more "natural" movements. As is the

case with conventional video, directors can view the recorded action in real-time or

immediately after taping and decide on the spot whether re-takes and corrections are

needed. Film stock, in contrast, has to be processed overnight before it can be reviewed.

The digitally-taped segments are transferred directly from tape to the computer hard drive

and can be manipulated in various ways through editing and digital special effects.

Digital recordings are deliverable instantaneously, via high-speed data lines, to post-

16 High definition television received a high-profile, global platform at the United Nations Millennium
Summit in 2000 where speeches by world leaders were broadcast in high definition and projected onto 300-
inch screens in the General Assembly Hall of the United Nations. Another highly visible employment of
HDTV has been in the space program. The shuttle has broadcast space images in high definition on several
occasions thus far.









production facilities where work can commence without any delay. (With conventional

film stock, images must first be scanned in and converted to digital code before

computers can add effects to the filmed scenes.) Color corrections are possible in the

smallest detail, pixel by pixel. If the finished product is destined to be shown on

conventional analog projectors, a negative print has to be created using lasers and a

special film printer. From this negative, positive prints can be produced in the traditional

manner and sent to theaters. In contrast, theaters that are able to project images digitally

can receive the finished digital film with no added steps or costly intermittent chemical

processes. The digital "print" is delivered on a portable storage medium such as a DVD-

ROM or a digital tape, or, even more efficiently, sent via satellite data stream. Every

copy looks exactly the same; loss in quality due to duplication never occurs with digital

code (unless the code is compromised). Although digital film production is merely in its

infancy, it obviously operates more efficiently and effectively than the traditional

production system. The Sony HDW-F900 represents merely the beginning in what

promises to be a productive future for digital video equipment used in film production.

Wim Wenders: Rebel without a Clear Cause?

[Video] represents a kind of democratic dilettantism: anyone can do it, anyone may
do it, who gives a shit.

Wim Wenders, On Film (1990)

I'd like to pass on a word of advice: image-makers and producers working in High
Definition should try to learn from a better source and a better tradition than
television. They should try to learn from the far more expressive and civilized
language of the cinema.

Wim Wenders, On Film (1990)

My own view of the future of cinema is less bleak than it was in 1981, when I made
The State of Things. New perspectives have opened up that were less evident then,
or perhaps some of my old bogeymen have disappeared. There is no longer the









arch-enemy 'television' and the devil 'video,' because behind and beyond them
there is a possible new ally and a new cinematic language in the form of the high
resolution digitally sorted image which is currently being developed.

Wim Wenders, On Film (1991)

Before Star Wars propelled the Sony camera to international stardom, Wim

Wenders had already experimented with it in his recording of the U2 music video to

accompany the song "The Ground beneath Her Feet" (part of the soundtrack for his film

Million Dollar Hotel [2000]). But these images were not Wenders's first to be recorded

on digital or high-definition equipment.17 He also shot the low-budget (but relatively

successful) documentary Buena Vista Social Club (1999) entirely on Digital Betacam.

And almost a decade prior to Buena Vista Social Club, in 1990, he spend several weeks

in Tokyo as one of the first Europeans (along with Peter Greenaway) who were allowed

to work with HDTV at NHK and Sony. Wenders used some of the images from the

Japanese HDTV-lab in his 1991 feature film Until the End of the World. Although

throughout Wenders's more than 30 years of filmmaking, his ouvre creates the

impression of being exceedingly receptive toward new media, his experiments also

exhibit a certain ambivalence, a concomitant distrust and enthusiasm, concerning

emerging visual technologies. From his earliest attempts to use a video camera in Nick's

Film: Lightning over Water (1980) to further examinations of this technology in the essay

film Notebook on Cities and Clahe%\ (1989), to high definition experiments in Until the

End of the World and digital video use in Buena Vista Social Club, his artistic use of new

imaging technology often exhibits a cryptic constitution. Besides using video to record


1 The terms digital and high-definition are not synonymous. Digital video has lower resolution capability,
uses different camera equipment and storage devices than HDTV. It is however possible, to convert digital
to high-definition video, but the end result will not exactly match the quality of recordings filmed originally
with high definition video.









images, Wenders also incorporates this technology into his films as themes and topics.

The End of Violence (1997), for example, features a video surveillance system and the

presence of television in one form or another is an ubiquitous element found throughout

Wenders's films, from Kings of the Road (1976) to Million Dollar Hotel (2000).18

Wenders has been involved in a love/hate relationship with the medium video, using it

whenever possible and concurrently expressing disdain and enthusiasm for it (especially

television) in interviews, films and his critical writings.

In the 1980 film Nick's Film: Lightening over Water, Wenders records the last days

of the dying American director (and Wenders idol) Nicholas Ray, who has directed such

Hollywood classics as In a Lonely Place (1950) and Rebeli itih,,t a Cause (1955).

Wenders and Tom Farrell, a student of Ray's, film the sick man who is suffering from

cancer not only with conventional equipment but also on video, the former intending to

draw an analogy from the video technology to the invasive cancer within the latter's

body. This analogy represents an extremely venomous attack when applied generally to

video as an artistic medium. Even the most rudimentary knowledge of biology confirms

that cancer cannot spread without using healthy cells as hosts, which is to say that video

must destroy film (the "healthy" medium in Wenders's analogy) if it is to creatively

grow. Whether Wenders intended to extend his analogy's meaning from his specific use

in Lightening to a general application and consequently arrive at such an unrelenting

statement is not entirely clear. In 1980 he nevertheless exhibits none of the enthusiasm

that many of his contemporaries, filmmakers and artists, displayed for this new medium.



18 Alter points out in F,. ,, ... History that, "TV has forcefully intruded into Wenders's films, insinuating
its supposedly malevolent, totalitarian, fascist presence into every nook and cranny of filmed everyday life"
(125).









The Superiority of the Filmic Image over Other Recordings

But what exactly defines Wenders's attitude toward emerging technologies which

threaten to remediate film and the cinema? Before this question can be answered, and if

at all, a short summary of Wenders's development as a film practitioner and theorist

spanning the years between Lightening over Water to some of his recent films can

provide a preliminary insight into the director's possible motivations and beliefs. Soon

after Wenders's film about Nicholas Ray debuted, the films Reverse Angle, Hammett, and

The State of Things followed in 1982. While none of these films utilize video as a

recording device, Reverse Angle and The State of Things both thematized image-making

technologies and institutions. In the same year Wenders also recorded a short

"documentary" film at the Cannes film festival entitled Chambre 666 which more overtly

revisits his concerns of 1980. For this film, Wenders set up a camera and filmed the

reaction of several directors (Spielberg, Antonioni, Herzog, Fassbinder, Godard, etc.) to

the following question:

Increasingly, films are looking as though they had been made for television, as
regards their lighting, framing and rhythm. It looks as though a television aesthetic
has supplanted film aesthetic. Many new films no longer refer to any reality outside
the cinema-only to experiences contained in other films-as though 'life' itself no
longer furnished material for stories. Fewer films get made. The trend is towards
increasingly expensive super-productions at the expense of the 'little' film. And a
lot of films are immediately available on video cassettes. That market is expanding
rapidly. Many people prefer to watch films at home. So my question is: Is cinema
becoming a dead language, an art which is already in the process of decline?19
(Wenders On Film 182-83)


19 The statement that films use too many points of self-reference is an odd comment, especially coming
from Wenders. Wenders has always been an avid practitioner of recycling inter-filmic realities himself.
Throughout his career, he has reused characters (e.g., the detective Winter, his "angels" from Wings of
Desire [in his 1995 Lumiere & Company segment]), copied shots from other directors (e.g., Ozu's Tokyo
street shot), employed directors that have had influence on his own career as actors (e.g., Sam Fuller and
Nicholas Ray), used fashion creations from documentary subjects in his fiction films (Yamamoto), made
videos & films of artists that appear on the soundtracks of other films (U2 and BAP), and recycled
locations from his films (e.g., the Tokyo Pachinko parlors).









The formulation of the question makes abundantly clear that Wenders's apprehensive

stance toward video is chiefly based on his fears that it will replace (not only corrupt as

he claims in Lightening over Water) his artistic medium, namely films made for cinema

and that his anxiety is chiefly directed at video as television, in other words at the

institution not the medium itself. He expresses his concerns more explicitly in an

interview in 1990 when he notes:

Now if you accept for all our attachment to the cinema that infinitely more
people watch videos these days than go out and see films, if you take that as a
given, and if you accept the projection of how things will be in ten years' time, say,
then it seems to me you've got to put an end to the deadly enmity between the two,
and accept video as a language. (On Film 72)

Video's prominent place in years to come evidently provides a more convincing impetus

to adopt it as an artistic tool than its medium-specific qualities; Wenders's motivations

appear less driven by artistic concerns than by his fears that he may be left behind by

technology.

In Chambre 666 the filmmakers' reaction to Wenders's question varied, from

Fassbinder's self-assured argument that films deliver what filmmakers infuse into them,

while television's money can help realize the filmmaker's individual vision, to

Spielberg's criticism of economic pressures produced by Hollywood's insistence on

propagating blockbusters (in retrospect a rather ironic reaction from a director who has

arguably supplied the blockbuster phenomenon with more steam than any other). Of the

responses, one stands out in particular. Michelangelo Antonioni, in his reply, declares

that "what we should really do is adapt ourselves to the future world and its modes of

representation. [. .] We must turn our minds not to the immediate but to the distant

future" and somewhat prophetically predicts that "high-quality video cassettes will soon

bring films into people's homes" (quoted in Wenders On Film 189-90). He defends video









as a medium worthy of experimentation, especially if it harbors the ability to conquer

film, as Wenders predicts in the original question. As Baier rightly points out in Film,

Video undHDTV: Die Audiovisionen des Wim Wenders, Wenders's turning point for his

negative attitude toward video (at least in his comments) ostensibly comes after Chambre

666, when he adopts Antonioni's more positive outlook and willingness to experiment

with video.20

Wenders's theories in the early 1980s concerning the adverse influence of video on

films and the cinema as an institution were, by no means, an isolated critique. Other New

German Cinema directors as well as theater owners agreed with Wenders and appended

his aesthetic apprehensions with the view that TV would develop into cinema's most

precarious competitor for audiences. In general, Hollywood and national film industries

outside of the US, including Germany's, viewed television, when it first emerged as a

mass medium, as the likely hangman of the cinema. Obviously, in retrospect, this anxiety

has proven to be unfounded. However, in the early eighties, with the advent of cable and

pay TV, critics, especially in Germany, still (or again) felt uneasy about how this new

medium would affect domestic motion pictures. As previously mentioned, this

apprehension, in contrast to Wenders's concerns of aesthetic confluence, predominantly

focused on TV as diverting cinema audiences. The Arbeitsgemeinschaft Kino e.V., a

group of small movie theater owners who provided a venue for films by New German

Cinema directors, declared the following in the early eighties: "Cable television's

establishment, the emergence of private television organizations and ever-increasing

20 Baier adds that after and during the filming of Notebooks Wenders acts as if his insights into video are
his own rather than a modification of Antonioni's response in Chambre 666. This is not an entirely accurate
assessment. In a conversation with Wolfram Schiitte in 1982, Wenders clearly acknowledged his high
regard for Antonioni's response and singled it out as an attitude which made a considerable impression on
him (On Film 206).









broadcasting of fiction films in state and publicly controlled stations are causing

conditions under which the majority of German cinemas will eventually cease to be able

to exist"(55) (a theme which Wenders treats in his Kings of the Road).21 This bleak

conclusion also did not prove to be an accurate prediction. As Hall points out, it was not

German cinemas, where most owners' main concerns coincide with high profits from

admission prices (which can be achieved more securely with Hollywood blockbusters),

that kept New German Cinema alive. Rather it was German television stations, through

financial backing and acting as an exhibition venue, that had the greatest effect and a high

stake in preserving an alternative national cinema (172).

As noted before, after Lightening and Chambre 666, Wenders not only discarded

his former hostility toward video, showcased as a cancer in the former and defacer of film

in the latter, but, practically speaking, wholeheartedly embraced this medium. In a recent

real-time chat on the Internet he even went so far as to claim that his animosity toward

video dates back to the seventies (although Lightening over Water was completed in

1980) and that a medium that he had once seen as a "devil" and "enemy" now had turned

into a welcomed ally. However, it was not until Notebooks of Cities and Clhahe\, that,

almost ten years later and to his own surprise (at least according to the voiceover in the

film), Wenders admits to accepting that the specifics of video technology can yield

artistic merit. He comments: "I made myself take [video] seriously, and, to my

astonishment, found myself enjoying it. And that's why I now believe you can use it in a

serious way-in spite of the way I've inveighed against it in the past" (On Film 351).



21 In the original: "Die Etablierung des Kabelfernsehens, die Zulassung private Femsehgesellschaften und
die inflationire Ausstrahlung von Spielfilmen durch die offentlich-rechtlichen Fernsehanstalten fiihren zu
Bedingungen, unter denen die Mehrzahl der deutschen Filmtheater nicht mehr weiter bestehen kdnnen."









Indeed, in Notebooks Wenders showcases some of video's advantages over film.

For example, when he displays video clips of the fashion show simultaneously with the

filmed/live show, he alludes to video's instant replay and real-time properties. In another

segment his voice-over comments on the unobtrusiveness of the video equipment on the

action in a scene as compared to bulky film cameras. His subjects, Yamamoto and his

crew, are more inclined to act "natural" in front of a video camera with a single recording

agent than when faced with a film crew and much larger and conspicuous equipment.

Wenders often films the video camera itself, so obviously compact and easy to handle,

and emphasizes its view-screen, the replay mechanism, in his recordings. Apart from

these comments and implementations, however, Wenders cannot completely hide that he

still strives with his ambiguous feelings toward video. The voice-over (Wenders)

comments on the recordings made of Tokyo: "In its own language, the video camera was

capturing this city in an appropriate way. I was shocked: a language of images was not

the privilege of cinema." But, in an interview discussing the film, he adds that his use of

video is "rescued" when he transfers it ultimately to film because he "would never ever

use video that had to remain video" (On Film 353, my emphasis). This, of course, does

not in any way echo Wenders's comment that after the seventies he had accepted video as

an ally. It makes clear, that even in 1989 he was still struggling with any such

concessions.

One aspect that can set traditional video images apart from film is the tendency to

favor medium close-up shots over distance and panorama shots mainly due to video's

reduced image resolution and the size of the television set as the display medium. In

Wenders's films, however, exists an abundance of long shots, a pre-occupation with









scenery (especially in his road movies) and frequent usage of film formats that exceed the

size of traditional 35mm film stock. Even at the early stages of his career (especially

internationally) the popular press identifies Wenders with a style affected by wide,

panoramic images. In a Time International spread in 1979, under the title "The Visions of

Wenders," Time depicts the German director with his (now ex-) wife as a bride against

the widescreen panorama backdrop of an Idaho landscape ("The Visions"). In the last few

years, in order to increase the dramatic effect of his widescreen images, Wenders has

employed Cinemascope format in several of his films, such as End of Violence and The

Million Dollar Hotel, and 70mm in Until the End of the World, a format which he claims

has not been used for any other European film in twenty years (On Film 286) and which

many cinemas are not equipped to project anymore (for distribution purposes the film

was released on 35mm).22 In the chat forum for Wenders's website (www.wim-

wenders.com) rumors circulate that the filmmaker is planning on making yet another

movie about Berlin, but this time filmed in IMAX, the largest image format in existence

today.

Most American films, shot after 1955, use a standard widescreen format with an

aspect ratio of 1.85:1 and European films usually employ an aspect ratio of 1.66:1.

Cinemascope is much wider than these standard formats with an aspect ratio of 2.35:1

and movies recorded in this format do so with the help of an anamorphic lens. IMAX, as

the most extreme of all formats, must be projected in a special facility, because it features

an image size ten times that of the standard widescreen format. In comparison, a typical


22 Interestingly, according to John Belton, digital technology has had a particularly damaging effect on the
70mm exhibition format. He contends that six-track digital sound combined with 35mm is more attractive
to studios, because it is cheaper to produce than six-track stereo magnetic sound used for 70mm prints
(103).










television set has an aspect ratio of 1.33:1, which means that films that use an especially

wide format have a more difficult time being shown on television or VHS-format video,

because so much of the filmed material has to be omitted (or is shrunk to a narrow band).

To lesson the impact of this image reduction somewhat, the industry has developed a

technique called "pan and scan" where the image is first shown in its entirety in a pan and

then remains fixed on one, presumably visually important, section. Of course, this

procedure manipulates the filmmakers original version of the film to some degree, and

many cineastes prefer to watch the film in its original size on their television, in

widescreen, although this reduces the image size overall and adds black bars of variable

heights (depending on the original format of the film) to the top and bottom of the

picture. By using formats such as Cinemascope and 70mm, it seems that Wim Wenders

consistently strives to offer, within his films, images that are, at least to some degree,

hostile to television technology.23 Cinemascope, in particular, was invented in the early

fifties (and first featured in The Robe [1953]), specifically to lure audiences away from

television.24 Wenders evidently uses the format with similar intentions more than forty

years later.25







23 Wenders's disdain for projecting his extra-wide formats on a limited display screen is obvious, as
attested by his inclusion of a film still from The End of Violence with the film's DVD packaging. This still
has inscribed, superimposed over the image of the female lead, the areas of the film still that would not be
visible to viewers on a limited size screen.
24 TV's technological development, however, has always trailed that of film, for example, concerning
resolution (only in the nineties can it approach 35mm with HDTV), size (will always be limited because of
domestic setting), color (decades after film), audio quality (surround sound technology can only attempt to
imitate stereo system in theaters). TV should have felt anxiety about cinema, not the other way around.
25 In theory, both Imax and 70mm yield more visual information and finer image detail than the 35mm
format due to the wider gauge of the film stock.









Wenders as Digital Guru

In recent years, Wenders has received much positive critical attention

internationally and in Germany with his experiments in digital filmmaking.26 He

acknowledged the significance of an impending digital revolution on cinematic ground as

early as 1990 when he states: "The leap from photographic image to digital information

really is a revolution: the risk is that film just stands there gawping [sic] with its mouth

open, and misses the connection." (On Film 352) It has become apparent that Wenders

will not be among those left behind paralyzed in wonder, but will be actively engaged in

shaping the future.27 In 1999 Wenders received the Production Solution Award at the

International Broadcasting Convention "Le Nombre d'Or" for his use of digital video as

an alternative to 16mm film (a format frequently used for documentaries). At the 2000

Berlinale the all-digital version of Wim Wenders's The Million Dollar Hotel was

projected at the official screening (although the film was shot on conventional stock and

later transferred). Wenders also conducted a digital workshop with Das Werk, Sony, and

Panavision representatives at the 2000 Berlinale. Moreover, Wenders interest and history

in experimentation with image technologies surely contributed to Sarah Moon's decision

to include him as one of the forty directors to retro-film a fifty-two-second segment with

a vintage Lumiere camera in Lumiere & Company (1995). In 2000, Wenders proved his

au courant technical standing when he and his production company RMF (in cooperation

with the WDR and the Filmstiftung Nordrhein-Westfalen) publicized their plans to

26 On the other hand, Wenders new-found enthusiasm for the latest innovations in video has also drawn
some criticism. Norbert Grob, for example, argues that, "it seems that because of his involvement in these
technical aspects Wenders has lost touch with his own cinematic precepts" (203).
27 Although Wenders is mentioned frequently in the popular and critical press as one of the visionaries who
have allowed digital images to enter mainstream filmmaking, it was actually Francis Ford Coppola and
George Lucas, two Hollywood directors, who initially heralded all-digital film productions. Wenders first
experiments in the early nineties came much later.









produce "Radikal Digital," a forum for European newcomer filmmakers, which will

include six films recorded digitally and inspired by the Dogma-style of filmmaking.

Shortly after "Radikal Digital," Wenders announced on his webpage a competition

entitled "E-Motion Bytes" geared toward aspiring filmmakers in Europe. The website

declared that "the award aims to celebrate the latest developments in young digital

filmmaking, to support new talents and to demonstrate the usage of digital media

technology in the realization of images and stories." Wenders also added the somewhat

arrogant statement "the E-MOTION BYTES, Road Movies Digital Shorts Award, stands

for Road Movies and Das Werk's commitment in new and aspiring filmmaking,

confirming their position as world pioneers" ("Forum," my emphasis). The "E-Motion

Bytes Road Movies Digital Shorts Awards" were scheduled to take place at the 2001 Hof

International Filmdays in Bavaria. Wenders, in collaboration with RMF partner Ulrich

Felsberg, was planning to award the prizes (including a DM 10,000 prize), but it was

decided to move the ceremony to the following year because they "determined that only a

limited number of the submitted entries shed light on the current state of digital

filmmaking, i.e., demonstrated the various possibilities in digital filmmaking" ("E-

Motion Bytes").28 Apparently too many young, aspiring filmmakers were treating this

"new" medium little different than conventional film technologies (a charge which I will

extend to Wenders himself, a little later).

Although certain aspects of video, especially its association with television,

estranged Wenders from this medium through the 1980s, the subsequent decade brought

about a complete reversal in Wenders's attitude-not toward conventional video

28 In the original, "Wir mussten feststellen, dass nur eine unzureichende Anzahl der eingereichten Beitrige
die derzeitige Lage des digitalen Filmschaffens beleuchtet, bzw. die verschiedensten M6glichkeiten des
digitalen Films demonstriert" ("E-Motion Bytes").









technology, but to emerging digital video technology. As already mentioned, after his

experimentation with early HDTV in Until the End of the World, Wenders recorded his

music-documentary Buena Vista Social Club entirely on digital tape with the Sony Digi-

Beta camera. Since then, he has become an avid user of digital video equipment,

especially for his non-fiction work and his music videos. For U2's "The Ground beneath

Her Feet" he opted for high-definition again and used Sony's HDW-F900 camcorder

which is able to shoot in 24fps (like a film camera) progressive high definition. His move

to digital technology was aided by the 1999 RMF (Road Movies Filmproduktion,

Wenders's production company) merger with Das Werk, a digital post-production

company. This alliance ensured Wenders ready access to digital production and post-

production facilities and equipment.

Until the End of the World or How to Split HD from TV

Wenders's use and self-professed, albeit reserved, admiration for video in the film

Notebooks of Cities and C1oth\, the 1989 essay film about Tokyo fashion designer Yohji

Yamamoto, was to be his final experimentation with conventional video technology.

However, it was not the last time he directed a film which thematizes emerging visual

technologies and their relation to the established medium of film. In Until the End of the

World he revisits his interest and preoccupation for any technology which has the

potential to displace or negatively affect the cinematic image.29 However, in Until the

End of the World, in contrast to Lightening over Water, Wenders does not simply depict

video as a technology pitted against film.30 Instead, the film uses a digital video



29 Since the extended UtEotWversion is not commercially available (yet), I will confine my comments and
interpretations to the shorter, official and autonomous version of the film.
30 1 will henceforth use the acronym UtEotW to refer to Until the End of the World.









technology, namely HDTV, which is much different from the standard video Wenders

used in the past, and he integrates it in a much more problematic and, at the same time,

interesting manner into the film's fiction and form. The staging of technology in general

in UtEotW, presented in the form of gadgets such as video phones, auditory and tracking

surveillance equipment, on-board computers, video faxes, etc., serves an important self-

referential function, in that it reminds the viewer that Wenders has already made the first

step into a prospective techno-laden future by using a new technology in the film

himself.31 In UtEotW, Wenders explores video's future place in a society (represented in

the film by HDTV) that appears saturated with an overload of images. In the fictional

adaptation and in the technical realization, video's prospective status as a cultural

determinant is dramatized in anything but a positive way. In the film, the main characters

experience mental breakdown and one character even dies after having viewed the

recorded high definition images.

In 1990, after Wim Wenders spend several weeks in Tokyo experimenting with

HDTV, he appears highly enthusiastic about high definition video's possibilities (in

public talks on the subject), especially when applied to the realm of filmmaking. At he

same time, however, he reveals an ambivalence about HDTV's intimacy with broadcast

television. In fact, in his speeches, interviews, and theoretical writings, he prefers to use

the Japanese title for HDTV which is "High Vision" with the designation "television"

conspicuously absent. At best, Wenders, a staunch critic of television's influence on film

practices and viewer expectations, sees HDTV as a medium which can aid in distancing

viewers from this perceived negative influence. In his opinion, high definition technology

31 Ironically, "the end of the world" is represented by a catastrophe that only targets technology and does
not destroy life. All electro-magnetic circuits get wiped from the nuclear blast but people are unaffected
otherwise.










is aligned closer with film than with traditional television and therefore able to project

more "truth" (a fantastic claim). Wenders is not alone in asserting HDTV's positive

influence on television as a medium. There are several other critics and practitioners who

agree with the basic premise of his analogy.32 Siegfried Zielinski, for example, makes

similar claims in his essay "Fin de Siecle of Television" as even the title implies. He also

prefers the term Hi-Vision (specifically to disassociate it from TV) and defines HDTV as

a hybrid medium capable of delivering a more natural aspect ratio (which we know from

the cinema), larger image projection (closer to cinema screen size), better image quality

(approaching 35mm film), film-like need for quality set design and compositions, and

adapting many film aesthetics (e.g., "the individual shot may become calmer and

steadier" [as in classic cinema]). Overall, Zielinski's (as well as Wenders's) projected

"improvements" inherent in HDTV over traditional technology all remain concerned with

achieving a more film-like experience, notwithstanding a smaller screen in a domestic

setting.33 However, Zielinski is right to point out that the heightening of realism revealed

in a high-def program in reality translates into heightened illusionism (79-80), whereas

Wenders puts forth the rather naive view that more "true images" will emerge.34 During a



32 Critics like Baier assert that HDTV is not a new technology but rather a technological improvement of
conventional video (72). I would disagree with this assessment and posit the claim that HDTV is to video
what the typewriter is to the computer word processor. Baier underestimates HDTV's otherness.
33 Zielinski also includes a brief summary of Alexander Kluge's ventures with commercial TV and
concludes that Kluge's TV "could be combined excellently with the hybrid medium HiVision: carefully
constructed audio-visions for the intimacy of a bourgeois salon" (83). However, he never states why HDTV
would enhance a Kluge interview show, or what conventional TV lacks in comparison. In my opinion,
shows like Kluge's "Kulturmagazine" represent programs that are constructed to make the most of
conventional technologies (for which they were conceived). His shows, as they appear presently, do not
require better graphical resolution, a change in image format, or digital mutability. Perhaps lower
production costs may be of value. Kluge's shows have done relatively well (in terms of critical success) for
almost twenty years without HDTV and that may be the best argument yet to stick with the original
formula.
34 Elsewhere, Wenders acknowledges and warns of electronic and digital image's excessive beauty and
accessibility, and comments that it is "not necessarily more trustworthy" (Act of Seeing 95), but he links









talk given at the IECF in Tokyo Wenders made specific comments on his use of HDTV

in Until the End of the World and his vision for this medium's future. He stated:

High Vision could balance the loss of reality by the gain in image resolution. [. .]
High Vision, and this is my dream, could help to sharpen our sense of reality; my
nightmare is if High Definition in the long run only continues to undermine any
remaining faith we may have in the truth of images."35 (On Film 358-59)

In Until the End he appears to have turned his own nightmare into a cinematic reality.

The film's high definition images neither reflect reality (they depict dreams and

subjective memories) nor do they evoke faith in any type of true images because they are

so highly manipulated. In the rare sequences where the high definition images depict

"life-like" subject matter their content is challenged in other ways.

In one of the initial sequences of the film we see Claire, the main protagonist,

passing by a large rectangular wall monitor as she is leaving a party. On this monitor

plays a music video, some of the very first images of the film shot in high definition

video. High definition video is the source material for HDTV, and it is very fitting that

the music video depicts a group conspicuously evoking the TV as a medium with its

name, the Talking Heads. The term "talking heads," a reference to TV usually derogatory

in nature, derives from TV's habitual use of the close-up. Although television literally

means seeing from a distance, it uses the close-up more frequently than film. UtEotW,

however, true to the genre of the road movie, does exactly the opposite, it presents us

with many sweeping long-shots of landscape and scenery, it even exhibits shots of the

entire globe as viewed from space (as well as stage the globe in fragments consisting of

this development primarily to the loss of an original, "no more proof of 'Truth' [ .] [causing] the distance
between 'reality' and 'second-hand reality' [to be] wider than ever" (95). He does not associate the increase
of definition with a loss in truth value as Zielinski does.
35 Of course, what Wenders calls a heightening of reality should also be interpreted as an increase in
verisimilitude (as Zielinski remarks), since HDTV makes it necessary for make-up specialists, set
designers, cinematographers, etc. to pay more attention to detail to retain the illusion of reality.









cities located in five different continents). Wenders has commented in the past that,

"television has eliminated the long-shot, which so beautifully conforms to the human eye,

and replaced it with the tedium of close-ups" (On Film 356). It is only within the

segments filmed in video that close-ups abound in the film. In other words, the film

visually celebrates its otherness, that which sets it apart, from television and (to a lesser

degree) from the medium video. As early as 1960, the media theoretician Marshall

McLuhan noted that one of the main reasons for TV's abundance of close-ups is tied to

its screen size and resolution (314). HDTV, however, with its improved resolution and

larger aspect ratio is no longer tied to close-ups. It is bound to change the aesthetics of

TV as well as video forever. Wenders, however, appears skeptical in his film.

In the filmic techniques employed in UtEotW, Wenders does not treat video as an

ally either, but rather showcases it as a rival to what he calls his "'sacred' celluloid

images" in Notebook on Cities and Clha/he Although high definition video's principal

advantage over conventional video is its clarity in images and realistic depiction of that

which is filmed, UtEotW primarily uses it for the dream sequences, memory play-backs

of recordings showing Edith and Henry's acquaintances and family, and the highly

stylized music video-clip. The images that are presented to the viewer in these sequences

have undergone drastic manipulation. They are fuzzy, distorted, and not at all

representative of their source material. Instead of capturing HDTV's primary

improvements over conventional video, Wenders obscures them through another

divergence, digital mutability. Also, Wenders foregrounds the digital nature of the

recorded dreams and memories, and therefore highlights their constructedness, through

various techniques. For example, several of the high-definition images projected onto the









laboratory's large screen appear highly pixilated or are prefaced by a representation of

binary digits.

Throughout the film's staging of HDTV as a technology, a highly negative

impression is channeled to the audience. The new technology cannot compete with the

traditional recordings which make up the main portion of the film. Images captured on

video do not appear "real," they remain obvious abstractions of reality. Although

Wenders has turned from staunch opponent to avid supporter of video technology in his

talks, at least concerning the digital variety, video's output in the form of television has

remained a thorn in Wenders artistic side.36 In an interview with Reinhold Rauh, in

response to Rauh's question whether German television is heading in the same deplorable

direction for which American TV has paved the way, Wenders goes so far as to declare:

"On the whole, I think television is becoming unbearable-naked fascism" ("Excerpts"

82). He even connects television's future course to UtEotW's narrative by calling the

medium's development "apocalyptic" (82).

HDTV's association with television and therefore with popular, mass culture, was

not only a concern of Wenders's. In order to inspire enthusiasm for their new technology,

Japanese television officials invited two European filmmakers, Greenaway and Wenders,

both known for their "high-brow" art films. This decision was surely motivated by the

desire to dress up a technology which should not remain associated only with popular

culture and the mass medium television. In other words, both directors were summoned

to uproot this connection and prove that HDTV has the potential to be a great asset to

serious and even non-commercial filmmakers. In the case of Wenders, the complete

36 To be fair, Wenders manages to set apart digital from conventional video and redeem the former
somewhat through an ironic twist in the narrative. In the film digital tapes are not affected by the satellite
disaster, conventional video would have failed, of course, due to its electro-magnetic nature.









opposite emerged in the final product; his film highlights rather than obscures HDTV's

relationship to television (in the same way that his earlier video recordings retained their

TV references). Greenaway's implementation of HDTV in Prospero's Books, on the

other hand, appears much different from Wenders's treatment. The British director

seamlessly integrates the technology into his film. It does not remain, as in Wenders's

Until the End of the World, set apart as a distinctive medium. The British director most

likely bases his synthesizing technique on his general attitude toward cinema. As Rees

explains in History ofExperimental Film and Video: "For Greenaway, Cinema is the sum

total of all technologies which work towards articulating the moving image. Cinema is a

continuum. It embraces equally the big movie and the computer screen, the digital image

and the hand-made film [. .]" (4-5). In other words, HDTV represents only one tool of

many for Greenaway to realize his cinema and does or even should not be seen as a

medium in and of itself when it appears in his film.

Although Wenders does not paint HDTV in the best possible light in his film, there

are moments when the medium's superiority over film emerges from obscurity into the

foreground. The sequences that take place in China, for example, appear as video

recordings, within the narrative and in technical terms. Wenders learns one of the

advantages of video over film equipment first hand during these shoots. The director was

refused permission to set up his film crew in China, which led Solveig Dommartin to film

the segments there by herself on the compact, mobile, and user-friendly video camera

("anyone can do it" after all). These sequences are woven into the narrative as videofaxes

from Claire to Gene. However, the recordings contain inconsequential, anecdotal

information disassociated from the narrative. They appear to only serve one of two









functions, either to highlight how unrefined and careless the video shots are compared to

the rest of the film, or to accentuate the compactness and portability of video as a

recording medium (or perhaps a bit of both). Since the images exhibit little or no

narrative function in the film, they stand out as a directorial comment on the technology

itself. But again, Wenders's point of view appears highly ambivalent.

Apart from Wenders's concerns regarding television's aesthetic influence on film

practices, his comments in the past also point toward television's commercialization as a

well for potential corruption. He claims:

The close ties between television and advertising have also done much to shape-
and deform-the language of television. In short: video culture has undermined and
largely destroyed its predecessor's language. Films nowadays look almost
indistinguishable from television productions [. .], the audience is so accustomed
to TV pictures that it now expects them even in films. [. .] television has replaced
cinema by [sic] something inferior. (On Film 357)

For Wenders, the commercialization of television has by extension also affected the

cinema, because, in the director's opinion, television has been exerting such noticeable

influence on films. Elsewhere, he laments the disappearance of film images that serve a

narrative function and claims, not without good reason, that "today, images have to sell,

not tell" ("Excerpts" 86). His position is however contradictory, since he cannot exclude

himself and his own practices from the commercialization of cinema. On the contrary,

compared to other German directors, he has emerged as the master in the art of cross-

media promotion, plugging his filmic work via soundtracks, books and photographs, and

he has even sold his own image (marketed as director) to American Express.37





3 In this advertisement, Wenders is depicted sitting in a car with his arm leisurely draped over the steering
wheel, making reference to his predeliction for using the road movie film genre.









Furthermore, as Baier points out, in the 1980's Wenders distinguished himself from

other directors by making product placement (using Camel cigarettes in Paris, Texas) an

acceptable practice in an otherwise "non-commercial" film (114). In recent years,

however, Wenders goes one step further and, not unlike his reversal of opinion

concerning video, finds a whole new way to relate to advertising. In a 2001 Der Spiegel

interview, Wenders remarks that prior to the 1980s "Ingmar Bergman and Frederico

Fellini still had to make advertisements in secret, and even Woody Allen was still

embarrassed about his first spots. Today, commercials are in many ways the avant-garde

of visual art"("Himmel").38 Of course, Wim Wenders has been filming commercials

himself since 1994 and therefore would appear as a hypocrite (not to mention inhibiting

his potential for reaping profit) if he continued his anti-advertising diatribe. Perhaps

RMP's 1999 merger with the digital production company Das Werk helped him

overcome his antipathy since Das Werk has such close ties to the advertising world (it

emerged from an advertising background to develop its current film repertoire and also

owns a majority stake in a German TV production company). One of its founding

members, Wolfgang Borgfeld, contends, moreover, that digital video developments,

especially digital effects, were and still are primarily driven by the advertising industry in

Germany and the rest of Europe (West). With these new business partners and himself

emerged in commercial practices, Wenders's relationship to television has slowly turned

from black & white to shades of gray. It is not surprising then that the director turns from

condemning television to foregrounding another "misuse" of video in his subsequent

film, The End of Violence, namely video as a surveillance apparatus.

38 In the original: "[Vor den 80er Jahren] mussten Ingmar Bergman und Federico Fellini noch heimlich
Werbung machen, auch Woody Allen hat sich fuir seine ersten Spots noch geschiimt. Heute sind die
Werbefilme in vieler Hinsicht eine Avantgarde der visuellen Kunst."










Video Recording as an Act of Violence: Wenders on Surveillance

The perfect disciplinary apparatus would make it possible for a single gaze to see
everything constantly.

Michel Foucault, Discipline and Punish

Surveillance as a topic provides a rich source for a critique of new media, and

Wenders's depiction of such techniques and equipment in The End of Violence warrants

mention. For, with this film the director enters into an already existing lively debate

concerning the merits and dangers of surveillance as a technology and social apparatus.

As surveillance technology matured and came to be rather sophisticated in the 20th

century, especially after World War II, it also entered critical discourse as a hotly debated

topic.39 Since then it has remained an intriguing issue with discussions ranging from the

panopticon to "dataveillance," and more recently, after September 11, in the U.S.,

covering various types of increased security measures and in Germany including the

practice of "Rasterfahndung."40 Surveillance has emerged as a theme in several genre of

artistic works and various types of media as well, such as George Orwell's 1984 (fiction

novel), Raimond Depardon's Reporters (non-fiction film), Vito Acconci's Following

Pieces (performance), Rem Koolhas' Projectfor the Renovation of a Panoptic Prison


39 William Bogard points out that even Marx displayed an interest in surveillance with its capacity to assist
supervisors in managing labor practices (a facet of Taylorism comically treated in Modern Times in a scene
where even the bathroom is monitored by the factory supervisor). Furthermore, according to Bogard, Max
Weber's theories concerning surveillance as a tool of bureaucratic control over individuals have played a
particularly influential role on twentieth-century academic surveillance studies (17-18). Important literature
on surveillance includes David Burnham's The Rise of the Computer State (1983), Christopher Dandeker's
Surveillance, Power, and Modernity (1990), Michel Foucault's Discipline and Punish (1979) and The Birth
of the Clinic (1975), R. Howard's Brave New Workplace (1985), David Lyon's The Electronic Eye: The
Rise ofSurveillance Society (1994), Steven Nock's The Cost ofPrivacy: Surveillance and Reputation in
America (1993) and James Rule's Private Lives. Public Surveillance (1973).
40 Rasterfahndung is a practice that dates back to Germany's problems with terrorism in the 1970 and has
been rediscovered after September 11 as a tool against potential Islamic terrorists living in Germany. This
system aims at discovering so-called terrorist sleepers, agents that are waiting for their deployment.
Rasterfahndung employs specific information from university databases and other public sources to seek
out individuals that, because they fit into a certain profile, may be terrorists "in waiting."









(architecture), Josh Harris's "we-live-in-public.com" (net installation), Peter Weibel's

The Panoptic Society or Immortially in Love / ith Death (interactive DVD-ROM), or the

"Big Brother" TV-series, etc. Recently, the topic also featured prominently in the

exhibition CTRL [SPACE] (October 2001) curated by Thomas Y. Levin at the Zentrum

fiur Kunst und Medientechnologie in Karlsruhe. Wenders enters into this lively discourse

and postulates his own theory concerning the practice of surveillance and the technology

involved in the methods employed.

As depicted in Wenders's film, surveillance equipment was once predominantly

invisible and used as a tool of public law enforcement. Unmasking or revealing such

equipment represented an effective subversive act against the powers-that-be. However,

these actions have lost much of their bite in what could be called a new era of

surveillance, in terms of technology as well as public attitude. Much of the current

surveillance apparatus in existence has become visible and integrated into daily life.

Commercial and private equipment far outnumbers governmental equipment. A survey of

Manhattan in 1998 revealed that of ca. 2400 security cameras only 10% were not part of

a commercial installation, and of that 10% belonged to private entities (Murphy).

Also, because hidden surveillance cannot be as effective unless it includes a large

supervisory body, principles of the panopticon are preferred. They operate more

efficiently since they utilize a preventative approach through the constant possibility of

observation rather than the cost-intensive practice of total coverage. Computer profiling,

stereotyping on the basis of prior actions and/or personal traits, also functions

preemptively "as a kind of surveillance in advance of surveillance, a technology of