• TABLE OF CONTENTS
HIDE
 Title Page
 Acknowledgement
 Table of Contents
 List of Tables
 Abstract
 Introduction
 A selective review of related...
 Model development
 Management of productivity
 Summary and recommendations for...
 Appendix A: State officers/staff...
 Appendix B: Definitions of symbols;...
 References
 Biographical sketch






Group Title: academic accounting model for community colleges
Title: An Academic accounting model for community colleges
CITATION PDF VIEWER THUMBNAILS PAGE IMAGE ZOOMABLE
Full Citation
STANDARD VIEW MARC VIEW
Permanent Link: http://ufdc.ufl.edu/UF00099494/00001
 Material Information
Title: An Academic accounting model for community colleges
Physical Description: vii, 163 leaves : ; 28 cm.
Language: English
Creator: Bibby, Patrick J., 1941- ( Dissertant )
Wattenbarger, James L. ( Thesis advisor )
Alexander, S. Kern ( Reviewer )
Smith, Albert B. ( Reviewer )
Publisher: University of Florida
Place of Publication: Gainesville, Fla.
Publication Date: 1983
Copyright Date: 1983
 Subjects
Subjects / Keywords: Educational Administration and Supervision thesis Ph. D
Community colleges -- Finance -- United States   ( lcsh )
Community college teachers -- Work load -- United States   ( lcsh )
Dissertations, Academic -- Educational Administration and Supervision -- UF
Genre: bibliography   ( marcgt )
non-fiction   ( marcgt )
 Notes
Abstract: The purpose of this study was to develop an academic accounting model to monitor internally the instructional programs at community colleges. The two components of the model were (a) a faculty workload model and (b) a productivity model. The faculty workload model consisted of seven categories of faculty activity and a workload point system. One full-time equivalent faculty (FTEF) was equated to 60 points. For the purpose of this study, enrollment was measured in terms of student credits and productivity was defined as a ratio: the number of student credits produced per FTEF. The productivity model, in terms of student credits and workload points, was given by the equation _ 60 x SC F " AP where P is productivity, SC is the number of student credits produced, and AP is the number of workload points assigned. The productivity model can be used to compute productivity at almost any level of aggregation, e.g., a single class, a group of courses, a department, or a campus. For a single class or a group of courses, the relationships between productivity and class size were presented in four theorems. The major applications of the study consisted of selected demonstrations. In each demonstration, it was shown that a desired productivity can be achieved at one level of aggregation by controlling certain variables within sub-levels. In particular, it was shown that a desired department productivity can be achieved by controlling average class sizes of homogeneous groups of courses and that a desired campus productivity can be achieved by controlling the productivities of departments.
Thesis: Thesis (Ph. D.)--University of Florida, 1983.
Bibliography: Bibliography: leaves 157-161.
General Note: Typescript.
General Note: Vita.
Statement of Responsibility: by Patrick J. Bibby.
 Record Information
Bibliographic ID: UF00099494
Volume ID: VID00001
Source Institution: University of Florida
Holding Location: University of Florida
Rights Management: All rights reserved by the source institution and holding location.
Resource Identifier: alephbibnum - 000487121
oclc - 11903058
notis - ACQ5221

Downloads

This item has the following downloads:

PDF ( 6 MBs ) ( PDF )


Table of Contents
    Title Page
        Page i
    Acknowledgement
        Page ii
    Table of Contents
        Page iii
        Page iv
    List of Tables
        Page v
    Abstract
        Page vi
        Page vii
    Introduction
        Page 1
        Page 2
        Page 3
        Page 4
        Page 5
        Page 6
        Page 7
        Page 8
        Page 9
        Page 10
        Page 11
        Page 12
    A selective review of related literature
        Page 13
        Page 14
        Page 15
        Page 16
        Page 17
        Page 18
        Page 19
        Page 20
        Page 21
        Page 22
        Page 23
        Page 24
        Page 25
        Page 26
        Page 27
        Page 28
        Page 29
        Page 30
        Page 31
        Page 32
        Page 33
        Page 34
        Page 35
        Page 36
        Page 37
        Page 38
        Page 39
        Page 40
        Page 41
        Page 42
        Page 43
        Page 44
        Page 45
        Page 46
        Page 47
        Page 48
        Page 49
        Page 50
        Page 51
        Page 52
        Page 53
        Page 54
        Page 55
        Page 56
    Model development
        Page 57
        Page 58
        Page 59
        Page 60
        Page 61
        Page 62
        Page 63
        Page 64
        Page 65
        Page 66
        Page 67
        Page 68
        Page 69
        Page 70
        Page 71
        Page 72
        Page 73
        Page 74
        Page 75
        Page 76
        Page 77
        Page 78
        Page 79
        Page 80
        Page 81
        Page 82
        Page 83
        Page 84
        Page 85
        Page 86
        Page 87
        Page 88
        Page 89
        Page 90
        Page 91
        Page 92
        Page 93
    Management of productivity
        Page 94
        Page 95
        Page 96
        Page 97
        Page 98
        Page 99
        Page 100
        Page 101
        Page 102
        Page 103
        Page 104
        Page 105
        Page 106
        Page 107
        Page 108
        Page 109
        Page 110
        Page 111
        Page 112
        Page 113
        Page 114
        Page 115
        Page 116
        Page 117
        Page 118
        Page 119
        Page 120
        Page 121
        Page 122
        Page 123
        Page 124
        Page 125
        Page 126
        Page 127
        Page 128
        Page 129
        Page 130
        Page 131
        Page 132
        Page 133
        Page 134
        Page 135
        Page 136
        Page 137
        Page 138
        Page 139
        Page 140
        Page 141
        Page 142
    Summary and recommendations for further study
        Page 143
        Page 144
        Page 145
        Page 146
        Page 147
        Page 148
        Page 149
    Appendix A: State officers/staff members interviewed to obtain data on funding systems
        Page 150
        Page 151
        Page 152
        Page 153
    Appendix B: Definitions of symbols; Summary of relationships
        Page 154
        Page 155
        Page 156
    References
        Page 157
        Page 158
        Page 159
        Page 160
        Page 161
    Biographical sketch
        Page 162
        Page 163
        Page 164
        Page 165
University of Florida Home Page
© 2004 - 2010 University of Florida George A. Smathers Libraries.
All rights reserved.

Acceptable Use, Copyright, and Disclaimer Statement
Last updated October 10, 2010 - Version 2.9.9 - mvs