PAGE 1

On the Same Page Improving Patient Care and Reducing Medical Liability Litigation Using Pre Suit Mediation July 28, 2011 M edical liability litigation is among the most complex policy issues facing the U.S. healthcare system. Many of the well recognized inequit ies of the current litigation driven system derive, in my opinion, from a conflict between the requirement of tort law to establish fault on an all or nothing basis and the highly variable and probabilistic nature of bi ology, disease, and medical judgment. The UF&Shands Pre Suit Mediatio n and Patient Safety Program ( PSMP), which was implemented on both the Gainesville and Jacksonville UF&Shands campuses on January 1, 2008, presents an alternative to the current litigat ion system and shows great promise as a patient safety and medical liability innovation Under the leade rship of Randall C. Jenkins, J.D. Senior Associate Director, Business and Patient Safety Operations at the UF Health Science Center and Adjunct Associate Professor of Health Services Research, Management and Polic y in PHHP, this program has made extraordinary progress, to be summarized below. Based on the results of the PSMP to date, and the potential benefits o f extending this success throughout Florida, Randy and Paul Duncan, Ph.D., Professor and Chair of the Department of Health Services Research, Management and Policy in the College of Public Health and Health Professions, applied for grant support and have r eceived a highly favorable score from the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) for a 12 month planning grant to expand the program to other sites, and conduct careful, thorough research on its impact. The funding decision will be mad e at a Fa ll, 2011 AHRQ Council meeting. Through its first three years of operation, the PSMP has successfully improved patient safety and has been well received by physicians, other professionals, patients and their families, a nd participating hospitals. It allows the involved parties to address concerns that if left unanswered, might lead to a lawsuit. Additionally, mediation communications than it would after the conclus ion of prolonged litigation. The PSMP effectively addresses both large and small malpractice claims by providing a trained, neutral, medical malpractice mediator to facilitate candid, confidential communication between the patient a nd the healthcare provider during pre suit mediation. The current litigation system: impact on medical liability costs and on patient safety and s atisfaction have contribute d materially to the overall increase in health care costs. The average payment for a malpractice claim rose from about $95,000 in 1986 to $ 336,437 in 2010. Each year, about 15 malpractice claims are filed for every 100 physicians. Further, legal defense costs have grown by about 8 % annually over the past several decades Ultimately, of course it is patients and their employers who pay t hese costs in the form of higher prices for health care and health insurance. Ironically, patients often retain less than half of the payout, even if their claim is successful. A recent study from the University of Michigan found that 54 cents of every do llar spent on compensation went for expenses related to attorney fees, and the costs of experts and the court's administrative process. ( J Health & Life Sciences Law 2009;2:128 32) Further, in part because the stakes can be very high, litigation takes an enormous amount of time, resulting in long delays before a patient receives proper compensation for a demonstrated error. In Florida, Missouri, and Texas, medical malpractice claims were filed with insurance companies an average of 15 to 18 months after a n injury After claims were received, it took an average of 26 to 29 additional months to close the claim And there fore few if any steps can promptly be taken to mitigate whatever circumstances caused the injury Is pre suit mediation part of the solution? Early p re s uit mediation represents an alternative approach that might be more effective than litigation in resolving the claims associated with perceived medical errors In litigation, the facts of the case are analyzed by a jury which hands d own a decision that is binding on both parties. Mediation, on the other hand, is a method of nonbinding dispute resolution involving a neutral third party who tries to help the disputing parties reach a mutually agreeable solution While litigation can tak e years, the time required for pre trial mediation

PAGE 2

can be measured in weeks. Under mediation, the patie nt receives a much larger percentage of the compensation, instead of less than half of the payment under litigation. W hile litigation is designed for la rge claims (as most attorneys receive payment on a contingency fee arrangement), mediation can handle both large and small claims. Finally, i f the mediation is unsuccessful or the claimant is not pleased with the outcome, the claimant maintains the right to proceed with filing a traditional lawsuit Building on mediation as a potential alternative to immediate litigation, t he primary objectives of the UF&Shands Pre Suit Mediatio n and Patient Safety Program have been: (1) a timely and fair evaluation of the quality of care provided; (2) confidential communication between the patient and healthcare provider that can lead to an early apology and appropriate resolution, while reducing the frequency of frivolous lawsuits. (3) mediation by a Florida Supreme Court certified neutral thir d party mediator facilitating a candid discussion with th e patient regarding the claim s potential strengths and weaknesses; ( 4 ) reduction of medical liability costs for providers; ( 5 ) app ropriate payments for meritorious claims, with a higher percentage of payments going directly to patients; and, pe rhaps most important, ( 6 ) prompt assessment of any apparent issue in patient safety and pro vider liability, producing a two page overvie w of the allegations, facts, and outcome that identifies quality improvement opportunities. Key e lements of the UF&Shands Pre Suit Mediation and Patient Safety Program The above objectives have been accomplished by implementing the following two key elements of the PSMP: Confidential Pre Suit Mediation Forum for Early Apologies : According to an oft cited study in Lancet (C h arles V. et al, 1994;343:1609 13), 37% of respondents said that an explanation and an apology would have made the differe nce in their decision to litigate. A variety of factors have led to the reluctance of physicians and hospital administrators to speak openly with patients about medical mistakes or even complications that occurred in the absence of negligence. These fears include a natural aversion to confrontation, concerns that a full and candid disclosure might invite a claim that otherwise would not be asserted, and anxiety that the discussion will compromise future courtroom defenses The PSMP utilizes the recent expa nsion of the mediation confidentiality requirements in Florida Statutes, Chapter 44, to provide absolute confidentiality to mediations that occur before a lawsuit is filed to create an atmosphere of candid, open discussion by all parties during pre suit me diation. The success of pre suit mediation requires a confidential forum for such discussion. This allows the parties to share information, build trust, and decide whether to resolve the dispute without fear of negative repercussions arising from sinc ere s tatements shared during mediation The confidential environment of mandatory, pre suit mediation fosters an atmosphere promoting early apologies by the healthcare provider to the patient In addition to creating a nurturing environment for early apologies by the healthcare provider, the presence of a Florida Supreme Court certified neutral third party mediator encourages patients to tell their version of the events and allows health care pr oviders to hear directly from t he aggrieved party about improving patient care. Closed Claim Patient Safety Modules : The PSMP combines mandatory pre suit mediation with the creation of Clos ed Claim Patient Safety Modules, which are two page documents crea ted when a claim is mediated without becoming a lawsuit. Together, pre suit mediation and safety modules promote and improve patient safety, provide healthcare providers with quality improvement opportunities, and identify areas of liability exposure that can be avoided by improvements to patient care. Each Safety Module contains a brief overview providers, and quality improvement opportunities. Al l individual identifiable info rmation is removed The module is labeled under categories material s designed to improve patient safety and satisfaction. In a medical malpractice c laim, the opinions and outlook of the aggrieved patients are critical perspectives for correcting system failures for future patients, which the legal system often overlooks. Thus, the PSMP not only expands existing root cause analysis by using the informa tion collected from the patient during pre suit mediation, but also through the production of the Closed Claim Patient Safety Modules, provides a mechanism for healthcare professionals who were not a part of the claim to learn and benefit from the patient care issues identified. Because of expedited mediation, this process can take place years earlier than it would in the traditional litigation process. Health care providers and organizations would not be comfortable sharing closed claim learning modules if a lawsuit were still

PAGE 3

pending for fear that the documents would be used against them in court. By resolving t h e claim years earlier through the PSMP, the closed claim learning modules are embraced by health care professionals and institutions. Results to date Thr ee years of data are available on the PSMP Some of the major findings can be summarized as follows: Timely Resolution for Meritorious Claims : In addition to the early creation of closed claim educational modules to improve patient safety at the conclu sion of a pre suit mediation, PSMP claims resolved 5.44 times faster than the average amount of time for a claim to resolve that utilizes traditional litigation thereby allowing patients to receive compensation much sooner. From 2000 to 2007, the t raditional litigation process averaged Since the PSMP began in 2008, however, mediated claim averaged approximately 6 months to reach resolution. Traditional litigation focuses on limiting focusing on identifying risks and hazards that lead to litigation. Closed Claim Patient Safety Modules promote and encourage early reporting, investigation, and resolution of matters without the expense and uncertainty of the legal system. Early reporting and resolution allow patient safety improvements to be identified and resolved, a nd the earlier the patient receives satisfaction, the less time spent litigating the case. Therefore, more money goes to the patient and less is spent on attorneys, evidence, and experts. Reduction of medical l iability costs for patients and p roviders : The PSMP reduces legal costs by shortening the time for resolution of a patient's claim, and also all ows much of the 54% of payouts that are (on average) subtracted from a p to now be distributed to the patient through early mediation. Unlike litigation, which punishes an undesirable event with a monetary sanction as a det errent to future malpractice (a flawed approach at best ), the PSMP recognizes that error prevention occurs by timely learning from experiences, continually i mproving internal deficiencies, and quickly compensating deserving patients. During the years 2000 2007, p rior to the PSMP, our averag e legal expenses paid per claim were about $60,000. This was reduced to a n average of about $7,000 per claim since the sta rt of PSMP. Moreover, the data ind icate that on average, patients receive more compensation per claim net of their legal expenses, than if they used the traditional legal system. This was due to the fact that a large portion of the legal fees and costs i ncurred by the patient under traditi onal litigation we re avoided. An additional benefit of the PSMP to patients is that it encourages patients/plaintiffs to bring smaller dollar value claims than would be economically sensible under the traditional legal system where the costs of litigation would leave little or no net recovery. Benefits of communication/early apology between providers and patients while reducing the frequency of u nmeritori ous c laims : Under the PSMP, every claim begins with the mediato r explaining the confidentiality pro visions governing the process The accumulated data indicate that p atients have viewed the opening session as a time when the healthcare provider or their representative not only listens to their problems, but also under stands how their experience could happen to other patients. The ability of patients to sp eak and be heard has been a critical component of the PSMP process, as the patient becomes an active participant in the decision making process, quality improvement op portunities, and claim resolution. Similarly, t he ability of the health care providers to hear directly from the patient about how their own system failed is a key component to understanding how to improve the system for future patients. The healthcare pr ovider then has a chance to offer an explanation or expression of sympathy an apology in circumstances of each claim. For PSMP claims where the health of care was met but that the patient did not receive adequate communication, the apology can focus on the communication problems and promises to improve the system for future patients. If the review finds that the role in the outcome and subsequent performance improvements. The early apology is a crucial component of each PSMP claim because the mere f met at some level. Moreover, t he candid confident ial communication prompted by PSMP has been shown to

PAGE 4

have the added benefit of deterring the pursuit of frivolous claims. Several patie nts participating in pre suit mediation have not pursue d a lawsuit despite the absence of compensation. P roduction of C losed Cla im Patient Safety Modules : The most influential benefit of candid pre suit mediations who were not involved in the claim at issue resulting in patient safety improveme nt. T he Closed Claim Patient Safet y Module described above, was found to be an extremely helpful learning tool for both the meritorious and non m eritorious claims asserted by patients. Even claims that met the legal standard of care from the perspective of independent expert reviewers still provide d, in many specific cases, opportunities to improve patient care. Grant funding to extend PSMP to Ta llahassee and Tampa If the AHRQ planning grant is funded, it would extend the Gainesville and Jacksonville programs for the UF&Shands PSMP to Tallahassee and Tampa. Florida State University and Tal l ahassee Memorial Hospital will comprise the Tallahassee site, and the University of South Florida Tampa General Hospital and the BayCare Health System will comprise the Tampa location. The collaborating demonstration sites will assess whether the principal components of PSMP can be successfully established in diverse healthcare settings, and document any barriers to such implementation along with their potential resolutions. Furthermore, the planning grant will generate ated pre post comparisons of patient safety and liability outcomes during the anticipated implementation phase In summary, the UF&Shands PSMP has clearly become an innovative alternative to litigation for malpractice claims. Experience during the first t hree years of operation supports its success as an alternative method of dispute resolution due to open and honest communication, full and frank disclosure, and early apologies. Patients have resolved their claims under PSMP more than 5 times as fast and h ave received equal or more compensation. Legal expenses have been decreased for providers and patients alike. We look forward to the results of the AHRQ planning project application to extend this program into Tallahassee and Tampa, and will not be surpri sed if the UF&Shands PSMP becomes a national model for malpractice claim resolution. Forward Together, David S. Guzick, MD, PhD Note: To learn more, please consult the following article, from which I liberally excerpted material for this newsletter: Jenkins RC, Warren LA, Gravenstein N. Mandatory pre suit mediation: local malpractice reform benefiting patients and healthcare providers. Am Soc Healthcare Risk Management 2010;30:27 35.


Improving patient care and reducing medical liability litigation using pre-suit mediation
ALL VOLUMES CITATION THUMBNAILS PDF VIEWER PAGE IMAGE ZOOMABLE
Full Citation
STANDARD VIEW MARC VIEW
Permanent Link: http://ufdc.ufl.edu/UF00099314/00035
 Material Information
Title: Improving patient care and reducing medical liability litigation using pre-suit mediation
Physical Description: Book
Language: English
Publisher: University of Florida
Place of Publication: Gainesville, FL
Publication Date: 2011
 Record Information
Source Institution: University of Florida
Holding Location: University of Florida
Rights Management: All rights reserved by the source institution and holding location.
System ID: UF00099314:00035

Downloads

This item has the following downloads:

( PDF )


Full Text



On the Same Page

Improving Patient Care and Reducing Medical
Liability Litigation Using Pre-Suit Mediation

July 28, 2011


Medical liability litigation is among the most complex policy issues facing the U.S. healthcare system. Many of
the well recognized inequities of the current litigation-driven system derive, in my opinion, from a conflict
between the requirement of tort law to establish fault on an all-or-nothing basis and the highly variable and
probabilistic nature of biology, disease, and medical judgment.

The UF&Shands Pre-Suit Mediation and Patient Safety Program (PSMP), which was implemented on both the
Gainesville and Jacksonville UF&Shands campuses on January 1, 2008, presents an alternative to the current
litigation system and shows great promise as a patient safety and medical liability innovation.

Under the leadership of Randall C. Jenkins, J.D., Senior Associate Director, Business and Patient Safety
Operations at the UF Health Science Center and Adjunct Associate Professor of Health Services Research,
Management and Policy in PHHP, this program has made extraordinary progress, to be summarized below.
Based on the results of the PSMP to date, and the potential benefits of extending this success throughout
Florida, Randy and Paul Duncan, Ph.D., Professor and Chair of the Department of Health Services Research,
Management and Policy in the College of Public Health and Health Professions, applied for grant support and
have received a highly favorable score from the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) for a 12-
month planning grant to expand the program to other sites, and conduct careful, thorough research on its
impact. The funding decision will be made at a Fall, 2011 AHRQ Council meeting. Through its first three years
of operation, the PSMP has successfully improved patient safety and has been well received by physicians,
other professionals, patients and their families, and participating hospitals. It allows the involved parties to
address concerns that, if left unanswered, might lead to a lawsuit. Additionally, mediation communications
occur in a timely manner; therefore, if "quality of care" issues are revealed, corrective action occurs far sooner
than it would after the conclusion of prolonged litigation. The PSMP effectively addresses both large and small
malpractice claims by providing a trained, neutral, medical malpractice mediator to facilitate candid,
confidential communication between the patient and the healthcare provider during pre-suit mediation.

The current litigation system: impact on medical liability costs and on patient safety and satisfaction
The costs of physicians' malpractice insurance and the cost of litigation associated with medical practice have
contributed materially to the overall increase in health care costs. The average payment for a malpractice claim
rose from about $95,000 in 1986 to $336,437in 2010. Each year, about 15 malpractice claims are filed for
every 100 physicians. Further, legal defense costs have grown by about 8% annually over the past several
decades. Ultimately, of course it is patients and their employers who pay these costs in the form of higher
prices for health care and health insurance. Ironically, patients often retain less than half of the payout, even if
their claim is successful. A recent study from the University of Michigan found that 54 cents of every dollar
spent on compensation went for expenses related to attorney fees, and the costs of experts and the court's
administrative process. (J Health & Life Sciences Law 2009;2:128-32)
Further, in part because the stakes can be very high, litigation takes an enormous amount of time, resulting in
long delays before a patient receives proper compensation for a demonstrated error. In Florida, Missouri, and
Texas, medical malpractice claims were filed with insurance companies an average of 15 to 18 months after an
injury. After claims were received, it took an average of 26 to 29 additional months to close the claim. And
therefore, few if any steps can promptly be taken to mitigate whatever circumstances caused the injury.

Is pre-suit mediation part of the solution?
Early pre-suit mediation represents an alternative approach that might be more effective than litigation in
resolving the claims associated with perceived medical errors. In litigation, the facts of the case are analyzed
by a jury, which hands down a decision that is binding on both parties. Mediation, on the other hand, is a
method of nonbinding dispute resolution involving a neutral third party who tries to help the disputing parties
reach a mutually agreeable solution. While litigation can take years, the time required for pre-trial mediation






can be measured in weeks. Under mediation, the patient receives a much larger percentage of the
compensation, instead of less than half of the payment under litigation. While litigation is designed for large
claims (as most attorneys receive payment on a contingency fee arrangement), mediation can handle both
large and small claims. Finally, if the mediation is unsuccessful or the claimant is not pleased with the
outcome, the claimant maintains the right to proceed with filing a traditional lawsuit.

Building on mediation as a potential alternative to immediate litigation, the primary objectives of the
UF&Shands Pre-Suit Mediation and Patient Safety Program have been:
(1) a timely and fair evaluation of the quality of care provided;
(2) confidential communication between the patient and healthcare provider that can lead to an early
apology and appropriate resolution, while reducing the frequency of frivolous lawsuits.
(3) mediation by a Florida Supreme Court certified neutral third-party mediator, facilitating a candid
discussion with the patient regarding the claim's potential strengths and weaknesses;
(4) reduction of medical liability costs for providers;
(5) appropriate payments for meritorious claims, with a higher percentage of payments going directly to
patients; and, perhaps most important,
(6) prompt assessment of any apparent issue in patient safety and provider liability, producing a two-
page overview of the allegations, facts, and outcome that identifies quality improvement opportunities.

Key elements of the UF&Shands Pre-Suit Mediation and Patient Safety Program
The above objectives have been accomplished by implementing the following two key elements of the PSMP:

Confidential Pre-Suit Mediation Forum for Early Apologies: According to an oft-cited study in Lancet (Charles
V. et al, 1994;343:1609-13), 37% of respondents said that an explanation and an apology would have made
the difference in their decision to litigate. A variety of factors have led to the reluctance of physicians and
hospital administrators to speak openly with patients about medical mistakes or even complications that
occurred in the absence of negligence. These fears include a natural aversion to confrontation, concerns that
a full and candid disclosure might invite a claim that otherwise would not be asserted, and anxiety that the
discussion will compromise future courtroom defenses. The PSMP utilizes the recent expansion of the
mediation confidentiality requirements in Florida Statutes, Chapter 44, to provide absolute confidentiality to
mediations that occur before a lawsuit is filed to create an atmosphere of candid, open discussion by all parties
during pre-suit mediation. The success of pre-suit mediation requires a confidential forum for such discussion.
This allows the parties to share information, build trust, and decide whether to resolve the dispute without fear
of negative repercussions arising from sincere statements shared during mediation. The confidential
environment of mandatory, pre-suit mediation fosters an atmosphere promoting early apologies by the
healthcare provider to the patient. In addition to creating a nurturing environment for early apologies by the
healthcare provider, the presence of a Florida Supreme Court certified neutral third-party mediator encourages
patients to tell their version of the events and allows health care providers to hear directly from the aggrieved
party about improving patient care.

Closed Claim Patient Safety Modules: The PSMP combines mandatory pre-suit mediation with the creation of
Closed Claim Patient Safety Modules, which are two-page documents created when a claim is mediated
without becoming a lawsuit. Together, pre-suit mediation and safety modules promote and improve patient
safety, provide healthcare providers with quality improvement opportunities, and identify areas of liability
exposure that can be avoided by improvements to patient care. Each Safety Module contains a brief overview
of the facts of the claim, the patient's allegations, the outcome of the mediation, key lessons for healthcare
providers, and quality improvement opportunities. All individual identifiable information is removed. The module
is labeled under categories such as "miscommunication" or "misdiagnosis," and becomes part of educational
materials designed to improve patient safety and satisfaction. In a medical malpractice claim, the opinions and
outlook of the aggrieved patients are critical perspectives for correcting system failures for future patients,
which the legal system often overlooks. Thus, the PSMP not only expands existing root cause analysis by
using the information collected from the patient during pre-suit mediation, but also through the production of
the Closed Claim Patient Safety Modules, provides a mechanism for healthcare professionals who were not a
part of the claim to learn and benefit from the patient care issues identified. Because of expedited mediation,
this process can take place years earlier than it would in the traditional litigation process. Health care providers
and organizations would not be comfortable sharing closed claim learning modules if a lawsuit were still






pending for fear that the documents would be used against them in court. By resolving the claim years earlier
through the PSMP, the closed claim learning modules are embraced by health care professionals and
institutions.

Results to date
Three years of data are available on the PSMP. Some of the major findings can be summarized as follows:

Timely Resolution for Meritorious Claims: In addition to the early creation of closed claim educational modules
to improve patient safety at the conclusion of a pre-suit mediation, PSMP claims resolved 5.44 times faster
than the average amount of time for a claim to resolve that utilizes traditional litigation, thereby allowing
patients to receive compensation much sooner. From 2000 to 2007, the traditional litigation process averaged
between 2 and 3 years to resolve a patient's claim. Since the PSMP began in 2008, however, a patient's
mediated claim averaged approximately 6 months to reach resolution.

Traditional litigation focuses on limiting financial liability using a "deny and defend" approach instead of
focusing on identifying risks and hazards that lead to litigation. Closed Claim Patient Safety Modules promote
and encourage early reporting, investigation, and resolution of matters without the expense and uncertainty of
the legal system. Early reporting and resolution allow patient safety improvements to be identified and
implemented much earlier than when traditional litigation is pursued. The earlier the patient's grievance is
resolved, and the earlier the patient receives satisfaction, the less time spent litigating the case. Therefore,
more money goes to the patient and less is spent on attorneys, evidence, and experts.

Reduction of medical liability costs for patients and providers: The PSMP reduces legal costs by shortening the
time for resolution of a patient's claim, and also allows much of the 54% of payouts that are (on average)
subtracted from a patient's recovery in litigation to now be distributed to the patient through early mediation.
Unlike litigation, which punishes an undesirable event with a monetary sanction as a deterrent to future
malpractice (a flawed approach at best), the PSMP recognizes that error prevention occurs by timely learning
from experiences, continually improving internal deficiencies, and quickly compensating deserving patients.
During the years 2000-2007, prior to the PSMP, our average legal expenses paid per claim were about
$60,000. This was reduced to an average of about $7,000 per claim since the start of PSMP. Moreover, the
data indicate that, on average, patients receive more compensation per claim, net of their legal expenses, than
if they used the traditional legal system. This was due to the fact that a large portion of the legal fees and costs
incurred by the patient under traditional litigation were avoided. An additional benefit of the PSMP to patients is
that it encourages patients/plaintiffs to bring smaller dollar-value claims than would be economically sensible
under the traditional legal system, where the costs of litigation would leave little or no net recovery.

Benefits of communication/early apology between providers and patients while reducing the frequency of
unmeritorious claims: Under the PSMP, every claim begins with the mediator explaining the confidentiality
provisions governing the process. The accumulated data indicate that patients have viewed the opening
session as a time when the healthcare provider or their representative not only listens to their problems, but
also understands how their experience could happen to other patients. The ability of patients to speak and be
heard has been a critical component of the PSMP process, as the patient becomes an active participant in the
decision-making process, quality improvement opportunities, and claim resolution. Similarly, the ability of the
health care providers to hear directly from the patient about how their own system failed is a key component to
understanding how to improve the system for future patients.

The healthcare provider then has a chance to offer an explanation or expression of sympathy an apology in
response to the patient's opening statement. The apology takes different forms based on the facts and
circumstances of each claim. For PSMP claims where the healthcare provider's review finds that the standard
of care was met but that the patient did not receive adequate communication, the apology can focus on the
communication problems and promises to improve the system for future patients. If the review finds that the
care provided deviated from the standard of care, the apology can also include an explanation of the provider's
role in the outcome and subsequent performance improvements. The early apology is a crucial component of
each PSMP claim because the mere fact the claim was brought indicates the patient's expectations were not
met at some level. Moreover, the candid confidential communication prompted by PSMP has been shown to






have the added benefit of deterring the pursuit of frivolous claims. Several patients participating in pre-suit
mediation have not pursued a lawsuit despite the absence of compensation.

Production of Closed Claim Patient Safety Modules: The most influential benefit of candid pre-suit mediations
is the ability to communicate "lessons learned" to other providers who were not involved in the claim at issue,
resulting in patient safety improvement. The Closed Claim Patient Safety Module, described above, was found
to be an extremely helpful learning tool for both the meritorious and non-meritorious claims asserted by
patients. Even claims that met the legal standard of care from the perspective of independent expert reviewers
still provided, in many specific cases, opportunities to improve patient care.

Grant funding to extend PSMP to Tallahassee and Tampa
If the AHRQ planning grant is funded, it would extend the Gainesville and Jacksonville programs for the
UF&Shands PSMP to Tallahassee and Tampa. Florida State University and Tallahassee Memorial Hospital
will comprise the Tallahassee site, and the University of South Florida, Tampa General Hospital and the
BayCare Health System will comprise the Tampa location. The collaborating demonstration sites will assess
whether the principal components of PSMP can be successfully established in diverse healthcare settings, and
document any barriers to such implementation along with their potential resolutions. Furthermore, the planning
grant will generate the "pre-program" data that will be necessary for the anticipated pre-post comparisons of
patient safety and liability outcomes during the anticipated implementation phase.

In summary, the UF&Shands PSMP has clearly become an innovative alternative to litigation for malpractice
claims. Experience during the first three years of operation supports its success as an alternative method of
dispute resolution due to open and honest communication, full and frank disclosure, and early apologies.
Patients have resolved their claims under PSMP more than 5 times as fast and have received equal or more
compensation. Legal expenses have been decreased for providers and patients alike. We look forward to the
results of the AHRQ- planning project application to extend this program into Tallahassee and Tampa, and will
not be surprised if the UF&Shands PSMP becomes a national model for malpractice claim resolution.

Forward Together,

David S. Guzick, MD, PhD

Note: To learn more, please consult the following article, from which I liberally excerpted material for this newsletter:
Jenkins RC, Warren LA, Gravenstein N. Mandatory pre-suit mediation: local malpractice reform benefiting patients and
healthcare providers. Am Soc Healthcare Risk Management 2010;30:27-35.




University of Florida Home Page
© 2004 - 2011 University of Florida George A. Smathers Libraries.
All rights reserved.

Acceptable Use, Copyright, and Disclaimer Statement
Last updated May 24, 2011 - Version 3.0.0 - mvs