Group Title: contemporary Spanish American novelists' theory of the novel
Title: The contemporary Spanish American novelists' theory of the novel
CITATION PDF VIEWER THUMBNAILS PAGE IMAGE ZOOMABLE
Full Citation
STANDARD VIEW MARC VIEW
Permanent Link: http://ufdc.ufl.edu/UF00098338/00001
 Material Information
Title: The contemporary Spanish American novelists' theory of the novel
Physical Description: ix, 209 leaves. : ; 28 cm.
Language: English
Creator: Lunsford, Ernest Jackson, 1945-
Publication Date: 1974
Copyright Date: 1974
 Subjects
Subject: Spanish American fiction -- History and criticism -- 20th century   ( lcsh )
Romance Languages and Literatures thesis Ph. D   ( lcsh )
Dissertations, Academic -- Romance Languages and Literatures -- UF   ( lcsh )
Genre: bibliography   ( marcgt )
non-fiction   ( marcgt )
 Notes
Thesis: Thesis -- University of Florida.
Bibliography: Bibliography: leaves 203-208.
General Note: Typescript.
General Note: Vita.
 Record Information
Bibliographic ID: UF00098338
Volume ID: VID00001
Source Institution: University of Florida
Holding Location: University of Florida
Rights Management: All rights reserved by the source institution and holding location.
Resource Identifier: alephbibnum - 000582634
oclc - 14152103
notis - ADB1011

Downloads

This item has the following downloads:

contemporaryspan00luns ( PDF )


Full Text










THE CONTEMPORARY SPANISH ArE.EHICAMr NOVELISTS' THEORY
OF THE HOVEL














By

ERNEST JACKSON LUNSFOWD, JR.


A DISSERTATION PRESENTED TO THE RPADUATc COUNCIL OF
THE UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA
IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIRErMENTS FOR T!:'"
DEGREE OF DOCTOR 3O PHIOSOPiiY




UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA































Copyright

By .

Ernest Jackson Lunsford, Jr.

1974














ACKNOWL E DGM ENTS


I would like to express my appreciation to the members of my

committee, Drs. Ivan A. Schulman, Irving R. Wershow and David Bushnoll,

for their help in the preparation of this dissertation. Special thanks

go to Drs. Schulman and Wershow, who guided and directed me in my research

and writing.













FOREWORD


This dissertation represents an attempt to give substance and

unity to the disparate theoretical ideas on the novel expressed in

the writings of contemporary Spanish American novelists. These concepts

are contained in books, essays, interviews, magazine articles, and, in

several cases, in the author's fictional works. We will structure these

theoretical positions to form meaningful similar or divergent ideas.

The term "contemporary novel' is not used in this study to denote

any single specific esthetic or ideological concept of the novel. but

rather to embrace the numerous forms of the novel of the last three

decades, beginning with Agustin YKez's Al filo del agua (1947), General ly

recognized as the beginning of a new direction in the Spanish American

novel. The authors dealt with in our study are all alive and still

writing, with the exceptions of JosN Marfa Arguedas and Miguel Anuel

Asturias, the latter of whom died during the period of the preparation

cf this dissertation, in June 1974.













TABLF OF CONTENTS


Page

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS. .. . . . . . . . . . . iii

FOREWORD . . . . . . . .. . ... . .. .iv

ABSTRACT . . . . . . . ... . . . . vii

CHAPTER

I ASPECTS AND CHARACTERISTICS OF THE TRADITIONAL AND
THE CONTEMPORARY NOVEL. . .. . .. .. . . . 1

The Decline of the Realistic, Bourgeois Novel
and the Epic Narrative . . . . ... 1
The Transformation of Latin American Society. . . 4
The Difficulty of the Contemporary Novelist's
Role. . . . . . . . . . . . 8
Exile . . . . . . . . . . . . 9
Universality Versus Nationalism . . . . 14
Models and Forerunners of the Contemporary
Spanish American Novel . . . . . . 22
Elements and Characteristics of the Contemporary
Spanish American Novel. . . . . . . .. 25
Notes . . . .. . . . . . . . . 35

II LANGUAGE AND THE CONTEMPORARY NOVEL . . . ... .39

The Need for a New Language . . . . . . .39
Forerunners of the Linguistic Insurrection. . . . 51
Characteristics of the New Language . . . . 54
The Baroque Tendency Versus Simple, Straightforward
Language; "Beauty" in Language. . . . .. 64
Experimentation with Language . . . . . .. 73
Notes . . . . . . . . .. . . . 81

III FOPJ,, TECHNIQUE AND STYLE IN THE CONTEMPORARY NOVEL 85

The "Total" Novel: the "Open" Novel . . . ... .85
Technique . . . . . . . . . . . 93
The Blurring of Genres . . . . . . . .. 108
Ambiguity . . . . . . . . ... . . 11
Style . . . . . . . . . . . . 114
Notes . . . . . . . . . . . . 121












IV REALITY AND THE NOVEL . . . . . . . . .

The Nature of Reality in the Contemporary Novel .
The Novelist as Witness to His Society . . . .
Commitment .... . . . .. .. . . .
The Social Novel; the Psychological Novel . . . .
The Novel of Ideas; the Metaphysical.Novel . . .
The Urban Novel . . . . .......
Alienation . . . . . ..........
The Difficult, Obscure, Complex Novel . . .. .
Themes . . . . . .. . . . . .
Notes . . . . . . . . . . . . .

V TIME AND MYTH IN THE NOVEL. . . . . . . .


Time. . .
Myth. . .
Notes ... .

VI HUMOR AND SEX

Humor . .
Sex . . .
Notes .

VII THE FUTURE OF


. . . . . .
. .. . . . . .


IN THE NOVEL ..



STHE . . .

THE NOVEL . . .


. . . . 176
. . . . 179
. . . . 186

. . . . 188

. . . . . 188
. . . . 193
. . . . . 196

. . . . 197

. . . . . 202


Notes . . .. . . . .


BIBLIOGRAPHY . . . . . . . . . . . . .


BIOGRAPHICAL SKETCH. . .. . .


__


. . . 209











Abstract of Dissertation Presented to the Graduate Council
of the University of Florida in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements
for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy


THE CONTEMPORARY SPANISH AMERICAN NOVELISTS' THEORY
OF THE NOVEL

'By

Ernest Jackson Lunsford, Jr.

August, 1974

.Chairman: Ivan A. Schulman
Major Department: Romance Languages and Literatures (Spanish)

This dissertation provides a cohesive overview of the theory of

the contemporary novel as expressed by today's novelists of Spanish

America. By "contemporary," we do not intend to indicate any rigid

esthetic definition, but simply to restrict our study to the novels

which haveappeared since 1947, the publication date of Agustfn Yghez's

Al filo del agua. This work is generally considered to signal a new

direction in the Spanish American novel, and so it provides us with

a convenient starting date.

The sources for our study are multiple. Much of the material is

drawn.from interviews with the various novelists, published in periodi-

cals and in book form. Some of the novelists have written theoretical

studies on the novel. In certain cases, novelists have included

theoretical material within the texts of their novels. We have

arranged the material by themes, in order to present a logical develop-

ment of such highly diversified material.


vii










In the introductory chapter, we look at the decline of the realistic,

bourgeois novel. The difficulty of the contemporary writer's role in

a developing society is examined, particularly the problem of authors

living outside their country. The related problem of universality versus

nationalism in the novel is examined. Then we define in general terms

both the novel as agenre and the contemporary novel of Spanish America.

The second chapter deals with language. The "linguistic insurrection"

is at the core of the contemporary novel of Spanish America. The need

for a new language as expressed by the novelists is examined first,

followed by a brief study of forerunners of the linguistic insurrection.

The characteristics of the new language are studied, along with the

opposing tendencies toward the baroque and a simple, straightforward

style. The chapter ends with a section on experimentation with

language.

Chapter III deals with form in the contemporary novel. Such

concepts as the total novel, the open novel and the epic novel are

seen as goals, along with the many techniques employed by the novelists

to attain those goals. The tendency toward the blurring of genres,

ambiguity and a study of novelistic styles are also included.

In Chapter IV, the nature of reality is defined by the novelists as

going beyond the everyday, tangible reality to a comprehensive, "marvelous"

view of reality, leading to magic realism. The social and psychological

aspects of the novel are examined as manifestations of this subjective

reality. The novelist's role as a witness to his society and his com-

mitment to social and political points of view are studied. The chapter

also looks at the urban novel and its accompanying theme of man's


viii










alienation, the tendency toward a difficult and.complex novel, and the

novel as a vehicle for metaphysical investigation.

The fifth chapter investigates time and myth in the novel. Although

these are very important elements in the contemporary novel, they con-

sume surprisingly little space in the novelists' theoretical writings.

Chapter VI deals with humor and sex-two topics which several

novelists feel should play greater roles in today's novels than they

presently do. Both are gaining ground today, but still seem to be

taboo with many novelists.

Our final chapter points toward possible future directions the

Spanish American novel may take-directions hinted at by the novelists

themselves. We come to no broad conclusions, since the novelistic

theory we deal with is highly diversified in content, subject and

major thrust. It is open-ended like the concept of the open novel

itself, and is sure to continue evolving as new novels appear and as

the novelists rethink their positions.













CHAPTER I

ASPECTS AND.CHARACTERISTICS OF THE TRADITIONAL AND
THE'CONTEMPORARY NOVEL

The Decline of the Realistic, Bourgeois Novel and
the Epic Narrative

It has been widely stated that the novel is in a state of crisis,

or alternately, that the novel is dead as an art form. This is allegedly

true for Spanish America as well as the rest of the Western world. The

Mexican novelist Carlos Fuentes, in developing his ideas on the novel,

summarizes one such thesis-that of Alberto Moravia. The Italian critic

contends that the novel's themes, characters, techniques and situations,

of bourgeois origins, have been superseded in terms of their mass appeal,

by television, the movies, the press, psychoanalysis and sociology. The

two great types of novels-those dealing with customs and those dealing

with human psychology-have already been exhausted, the former by

Flaubert, and the latter by Proust and Joyce. The bourgeoisie, whose

dominant life-style nurtured the novel, is in decline according to this

theory, and thus, the novel as well. The novelist can only be a witness

to this process of decadence leading to noia, tedium, boredom and in-

difference.'

Fuentes rejects Moravia's: thesis, first, because the Mexican novelist

believes such early prototypical narratives as those of Boccaccio, the

Thousand and One Nights or the medieval novels of chivalry disprove the

theory of the novel's bourgeois beginnings (although Fuentes concedes that









the novel's major development has coincided with the rise and triumph

of the middle class and its dialectic of individual enterprise). In

countering Moravia's arguments, Fuentes insists that what is dead is

not the novel, but the bourgeois form of the novel, i.e., a descriptive,

psychological,. critical form of observing personal and social relations

in the Flaubertian style. But Fuentes insists that the death of this

realism in no way means that the raw material of literary reality has

died with it. In fact, he sees new trends in literature as opening a

wider, a more all-inclusive window on reality, redefining the nature of

reality (as we shall see in Chapter IV). Realism as Flaubert, P6rez

Gald6s or Manuel G9lv.ez knew it may be dead or exhausted, but the novel

remains a viable genre.2

Let us look briefly at the "traditional" Spanish American novel,3

in order to better understand the background out of which today's con-

temporary novel has arisen. The traditional novel of Spanish America

followed very closely the prevailing European literary styles, but

generally with one salient difference: geography and nature tended to

be not so much the background for this literature as the foreground-the

theme and even .the protagonist. Every student of the .novel knows that

the traditional novel of these countries tended to be an epic depiction

of the struggle-between man and nature, a struggle immortalized in

Domingo Faustino Sarmiento's classic depiction of the urban forces of

civilization versus the rural forces of ignorance and barbarism,

Civilizaci6n y barbarie (Facundo). In'these novels, man and nature were

generally prototypes, symbolic representations of an idea or a point of

view, and not well-developed, "rounded" characters whose life experience









was revealed as the novel progressed. Thus, in R6mulo Gallegos' classic

novel of antithesis, Dofa Barbara, Santos Luzardo is the symbolic

embodiment'of the city, its civilization, its education and the enl.ight-

enment the landholders could create in Venezuela if they would dedicate

themselves to the principles and ideals represented by Santos Luzardo..

Dora Barbara, Luzardo's antithesis, is the embodiment.of the primitive,

rural Venezuela-passionate, vindictive, uneducated, strong-willed, un-

principled, a symbol of the ignorance and feudalism which, together with

the forces of right and reason, constitute an antagonistic and syncretic

culture.

The first hundred years of the novel constitute a Spanish American

geographical epic, involving the process of self-discovery and cultural

identification. The novel, following European literary modes, incorpo-

rated Hispanic costumbrismo, regionalism, realism and naturalism in its

classic, traditional works: Jos4 Eustasio Rivera's La Vordgine (1924),

Ricardo GUiraldes' Don Segundo Sombra (1926), R6mulo Gallegos' Doha

Barbara (1929), Jorge Icaza's Huasipungo (1934), Ciro Alegrfa's El mundo

es anchor y ajeno (1941). While social and psychological problems also

appear in these novels, character portrayal remains a secondary concern

and fundamentally symbolic in nature.4 Thus, the traditional novel has

given us many memorable types, but few multidimensional characters.

In this regard, as Carlos Fuentes notes, the traditional Spanish

American novel was more concerned with the relation between the physical

environment and man than with man himself.5 Amazed at and intimidated

by the splendor and majesty of the continent's immense jungles, rivers,

plains and mountains, the novelist tended to become a chronicler,






4


transfixed like the first cronistas by the natural wonders around him,

and too preoccupied by pressing social and economic issues to portray

the human elements.of this New World in any other than a symbolic

formulation tied to a geographic or.socio-political thesis. While

considerable attention was given to the depiction of regional or

national customs, the portrayal of the psychological aspects of characters

remained relatively superficial. *Fuentes states that Spanish America

achieved political independence without achieving any true human

identity.6 This is certainly true in the novel. The individual simply

did not offer the same attraction as collective man within his geographic

context.

This schematic overview of the traditional Spanish American novel

will serve to place the contemporary novel in Spanish America in a

contrastive perspective.


The Transformation of Latin American Society

The breakdown of the novel's old realistic approach is directly

related to the breakdown of the old reality. Carlos Fuentes attributes

the major restructuring of twentieth-century Latin American society to

one basic cause (while admitting others): United States capitalism.

Large investments in both industry (urban) and agriculture (rural)

brought about a precipitous breakdown of the traditional Latin American

social and economic patterns-imechani2ation, modern agricultural methods,.

agrarian reform, a massive flight to the cities and subsequent explosive

growth in the urban areas. Latin America has taken one giant leap from

the simplicity and order of a neo-feudalistic society to the nerve-jangling


__









complexity and chaos of urban twentieth-century life. The novel, in its

constant endeavor to depict man, has understandably undergone drastic

changes. Sarmiento's simplistic antithesis "civilization versus

barbarism" has scant applicability to contemporary society. -Today's

social order is in a constant state of flux, one in which the choices

and directions are not clear. Latin.American man, like his contempo-

raries around the world, must grope to find his way out of his quandary.

To portray this new and complex society, the novelist finds old literary

forms insufficient. As Roa Bastos states, the novelist finds it necessary

to seek his expression through new technical, esthetic, linguistic and

even ideological modes in order to achieve a more universal view of

Latin America.7 As the Mexican poet Octavio Paz declares, the essence

of the Latin American experience today is that at last, Latin American

man is the contemporary of all men.8 This statement coincides precisely

with Fuentes' idea that Europe is no longer the only center of occidental

culture. Formerly, to be read and applauded in Paris was the dream of

every Latin.American writer. But today, with the emergence of the

so-called Third World and the political and military power of the United

States and Russia, Europe has lost its stranglehold as the center of

"civilization," and that center has been spread out diffusely to many

points, no longer easy to pinpoint (just as the concept of "civilization"

is no longer as easy to define as it was for Sarmiento). Latin America,

formerly relegated to the periphery of world affairs and world culture,

suddenly finds that it has as much right to be a "center" of civilization

as any other cultural center.9 The old hierarchy is gone. The Latin

American novelist is no longer automatically labeled inferior if he does









not follow the latest literary trends of Paris or Madrid. Thus, a new

freedom ofexperimentation and originality is open to the Spanish

American author. The resultant expression is the "new novel" or
"contemporary novel" of the last three decades. Fuentes goes on to

state that one of the principle tenets of the new novel is the

destruction of the old black-and-white polarities and false polemics:

realism versus fantasy; "committed" art versus "pure" art; "national"

literature versus "universal" or "cosmopolitan" literature; "social"

versus "psychological" novel; as well as the eternal question of

civilization versus barbarism."0 The introduction of imagination, a

thorough house-cleaning of language, and numerous other aspects of the

new novel (themes, problems and techniques which we will examine in

subsequent chapters) are the tools the novelists use to achieve their

goal of expressing a new experience. This experience, as we have stated,

is largely urban and typically complex. As Fuentes points out, the

easily grasped right-versus-wrong view of justice depicted in Doha

Barbara is far removed from the complex, ambiguous and uncertain view

of justice presented in Mario Vargas Llosa's La ciudad y los perros."

We might add the illustrations of Rivera's La Voragine and Gabriel

Garcla Mdrquez's Cien anos de soledad. Both are by Colombian authors

and deal with life in the jungles of Colombia, but there is an enormous

gulf between them in style, interpretation and intent. The old vision

was based on less complex formulations; the reader felt surer, safer, on

more solid moral ground. But the new vision (in GarcTa MArquez's book),

though often perplexing, is a more complete vision of today's conflictive,

.ambiguous world, and thus more honest and more representative.









The increasing urbanization of Latin America has produced an

increasingly urban-oriented novel. The pampa has given way to Buenos

Aires, the Andes and jungle to Lima and Bogota. As Vargas Llosa points

out, the old-style novels dealing with the jungles, the plains and the

mountains, were just as exotic to the residents of Latin America's

cities as a French novel about Paris, a Spanish novel about Madrid or

an American novel about New York. The Latin American born and raised

in a city generally knew nothing of the rural areas of his nation, and

his poor, slum-dwelling neighbors, immigrants from the countryside, were

generally illiterate and did not read these.novels which dealt with their

native environment. Thus, the traditional novelist, knowingly or not,

was writing a novel exotic in nature to the audience for which it was

intended."2 Hence, the contemporary novelist turns more'and more to

the cities of Latin America for settings, characters and situations.

But this should not lead one to think that:nature and geography have

been discarded. Far from it. Vargas Llosa, whose first novel La ciudad

y los perros is a totally urban novel, turns back to the Peruvian

hinterland and provincial towns for his second novel, La casa verde.

And as he points out, rural areas are also the settings for Juan

Rulfo's Pedro Paramo, Augusto Roa Bastos' Hijo de hombre and Gabriel

Garcia Mgrquez's entire novelistic production, particularly his

masterpiece Cien ahos de soledad. Vargas Llosa'points out that while

the locale and the characters in the novels appear to be the same as in

the traditional novels, nature has now become the backdrop (rather than

the actual protagonist of the novel) and has been assimilated through

mythification, as a ritualistic, integral component of the characters'









lives.13 Nature also plays an integral part in the works of two other

contemporary novelists-Jos6 Maria Arguedas of Peru and Miguel Angel

Asturias of Guatemala-whose novels delve into the mentality of the large

Indian populations of their respective countries. The Indian, with his

animistic beliefs in human relationships with flowers, trees, rocks, animals

and rivers, naturally leads these two novelists into the countryside and

away from the cities which are so foreign to the Indian. But this

attempt to portray the Indian mentality constitutes an atypical departure

within the contemporary Spanish American novel, and does not negate the

general movement toward urban settings. We should point out, however, that

overtones of the old "civilization versus barbarism" polemic remain

(archetypes die hard) even in sophisticated contemporary novels-one

thinks of Asturias' El senor president and Alejo Carpentier's Los

pass perdidos, in which, at least to some extent, the city embodies

corruption, tedium and death, and the countryside promises personal

freedom, release and utopia. Yet even El senor president and Los

pasos perdidos are essentially "urban" novels in terms of their per-

spective: their protagonists portray a contemporary, urban viewpoint..'


The Difficulty of the Contemporary Novelist's Role

Although the problems of writing do not constitute one of the domi-

nant themes in the theoretical works of Spanish America's novelists, some

have commented on the subject, specifically the question of an author's

position in an .underdeveloped country,-where literature often seems an

unnecessary, if not frivolous, profession. Also, many of our novelists

speak of the impossibility, or at least the extreme difficulty, of trying










to earn a living from writing. Such extraliterary concerns certainly

affect the literary works of the novelists.

Carlos Fuentes discusses the situation of the traditional Spanish

American novelist in nations with notorious political instability, lack-

ing a free press, a responsible Congress, or strong labor unions. In

such a society, the novelist felt compelled to simultaneously play the

roles of legislator, reporter, revolutionist and thinker.'5 He served

as the nation's political and social conscience, as official protester

of injustices perpetrated against the poor and the oppressed. While

such crusading has not disappeared, it plays a secondary role today,

perhaps because there are other (and larger) groups of people in Latin

America who have taken up the banners of social justice. Ernesto

SMbato states that to be a Spanish American writer is to be doubly

tormented-not only does one bear the torment of the writer, but

additionally the torment of being a Latin American.16 .Sdbato goes on

to warn that, due. to the conditions to which Carlos Fuentes referred

(above), the Spanish American novelist's greatest problem is earning a

living from literature without prostituting the art, without "instrumental-

izing" it. For Sabato, literature is a sacred act, and to defile it is

to defile oneself as an author.17


Exile

This dilemma of the contemporary novelist's perspective brings us to

one of the thorniest problems and one of the most controversial aspects

of the situation of today's.writers-their frequent "exile" (even the

word "exile" is controversial and is generally rejected by those who live





10


outside their nation). A simple fact of life is that many of today's

leading Spanish American novelists live outside their native country,'

most of them in Europe. The.great majority of thdse have freely chosen

to live elsewhere. The problem is that their countrymen criticize this

self-imposed "exile," labeling it as "running away," as cosmopolitanism

(in a negative sense), and even as something closely akin to literary

desertion. The fact that such criticism rankles (and that it perhaps

does, to some extent, zero in on a point about which these novelists

feel at least a small amount of guilt or discomfort) is evidenced by

the extensive rebuttals these writers have given to justifying their

exile, both in their theoretical expositions and in interviews.

Julio Cortdzar for example rejects the label "exile," stating that

he chose to move from Argentina to France, and that he does not feel at

all like an exile. He states that the confusion or misunderstanding

boils down to a distinction between the author's physical presence in

his own nation and his presence as an author there. As an illustration

he offers the hypothetical case of an Argentine author who writes a

novel in Spanish in Tokyo, and has it published in Argentina. That author,

he states, has not left Argentina nor abandoned the best that he has to

offer, which is his quality as a writer.. Spiritually, that author is

not an exile. And that, continues Cortazar,.is his case. He does not

need the physical presence of Argentina in order to be able to.write.

Yet he states that he feels, lives and thinks "in Argentine," and is

very pleased when the critics say that his novels are profoundly

Argentine. He concludes by affirming that with him, there has been

no spiritual uprooting (desarraigo), and that his moving to-France was

a mere "corporeal displacement."18









Cortazar bitterly attacks those Argentines who insist that a writer

must reside in Argentina in order to be able to write "in Argentine."

He refers to their attitude ironically as demanding "required class

attendance." His rebuttal goes to-the following argument: if his

novels have met with success and wide reader.acceptance both in Argentina

and abroad (as indeed they have), it is in great part due to the fact that

his work is both broad and complex. It takes as a point of departure

that which is uniquely his, that which arises out of his own inspiration

and imagination, and goes on from there to open itself to experiences

and influences of the most disparate nature, rejecting nothing as being

"foreign" or "extraneous." Assimilation through a type of literary

osmosis is what Cortazar believes gives his novels the panoramic scope

which fascinates the reader. Yet he assimilates this diversity through

his own personal (and therefore Argentine) perspective. And he claims,

furthermore, that his overview would not be as easy to achieve in

Argentina as in France. Thus, he feels that if he has brought some degree

of excellence and originality to the Argentine novel, it has been at

least indirectly as a result of his residence abroad. And so, Cortdzar

remains, and is prepared to remain, a "Latin American writer in France."

In this he sees no paradox nor betrayal of his country, but merely an

exercise of personal choice."

Cortazar, furthermore, raises the question of the literary freedom

he enjoys in France, a freedom which he and other Latin American writers

might not have in their native countries, with their periodic govern-

mental upheavals and repressive regimes. Cortazar escapes all these

disruptive circumstances by residing outside the reach of his government's









influence.20 (Other writers who have fled from hostile regimes are

Guillermo Cabrera Infante and Augusto Roa Bastos.)

A different point of view on exile is expressed by Guatemala's

Miguel Angel Asturias. He observes that artists who are particularly.

sensitive and aware of nature, sights and sounds, colors, beauty, feel-

ings, etc., have a natural tendency to lose their appreciation of their

natural surroundings through constant exposure to them: On the other

hand, distance gives perspective and sharpens perception. Then the

writer "...appreciates the landscape better, sees characters and hears

sounds more clearly.... When one returns after a time one finds a new

world...."21 Asturias points to a specific example from his own works;

he believes that the view of Guatemala he produced in Hombres de mafz

and Mulata de tal is a far deeper, more complete, more essential view of

the country than the impressionistic beauty of his earlier Leyendas de

Guatemala. This difference he attributes to his absence from Guatemala

for ten or twelve years'before returning to write his more mature works.22

Carlos Fuentes draws an interesting comparison between Latin America's

major writers living in Europe today and the writers of the United States'

"lost generation" who lived in Europe between the two World Wars-Henry

James, Gertrude Stein, Ezra Pound, Ernest Hemingway, F. Scott Fitzgerald.

Fuentes points out.that these North American writers, in exile, were

working a literary revolution which would change forever the course of

American letters. No less so are today's Spanish American exiles

revolutionizing the course of Spanish American letters. Fuentes suggests

that if the United States had not had its generation of "authors in exile,"

its literature might have developed within the confines of an intranscend-





13


ental "naturalistic" style at one extreme or an "esthetic" style at the

other. In the light of Fuentes! remarks, it is significant to note that

no one today accuses Hemingway or Fitzgerald of being "un-American" or

"cosmopolitan" writers in a pejorative sense. The same should and will be

the case in Spanish America if Fuentes has his way. In fact, he claims

that Spanish American literature, if it is not to stagnate through

cultural isolation, must have authors live abroad and write about more

than their own country. The novelist thus opens his vision to a wider

range of possibilities, more variety, which leads to the experimentation

which is at the heart of the contemporary novel.23 Fuentes concludes.

that the true ideal of Latin American culture and identity should be,

once again, Octavio Paz's affirmation that now Latin American men are

'the contemporaries of all men.24

The contemporary'novelists' discussion of exile is not developed as

a defense, however. They do admit physical exile has drawbacks, though

they consider them minor. Cortgzar admits that he fears a gradual

erosion of his feel for conversational Spanish. He feels a loss of

contact with the Spanish language on a constant daily basis.25

Asturias similarly concedes that by going away from his country, the

author loses the "pristine inspiration of its auditive, olfactive elements,

and even the gustative ones, as every country has its own dishes...."26

But.he maintains that the temporary loss of contact with his nation's sights,

sounds, smells and tastes is more than compensated by the writer's gain in

perspective. Both Asturias27 and Colombia's Gabriel Garcfa M&rquez28

affirm that for them, the ideal solution would be to be able to shuttle

back and forth at will between Europe and Latin America, thus maintaining





]_










contact with the spiritual source but at the same time gaining a

critical perspective.


Universality Versus Nationalism

This question of exile among Spanish America's novelists is very

directly related to a problem which has plagued Latin American letters

from the beginning and has become more prominent in the contemporary

period-the problem of "universal" literature versus "national" literature.

That is, should the writer look outward, toward the situations and

problems of some theoretical "universal man," or should he concentrate

his vision within his own nation, writing about the people who live

there, their social and cultural problems. This thematic conflict has

always placed the Spanish American novelist in a traditionally uncom-

fortable position of having to opt for one or the other pole. Carlos

Fuentes points out the consequences which the novelist faces, torn between

these two poles: if he takes the "nationalist" path, he in fact straps

himself into the outmoded literary forms of realism-naturalism, in

addition to automatically limiting his audience almost exclusively to his

fellow countrymen, the only public likely to be familiar with and interested

in regional or national themes. If, on the other hand, the novelist prefers

the "international" or "universal" trend, his recourse is to turn to the

European literary vanguard of his day for style and theme (for as we have

noted before, Europe, and particularly Paris, have traditionally been looked

upon as the principal source of artistic inspiration). This invariably

leads to the would-be "universal" author's being totally ignored by the


I









reading public, both at home and abroad-the former because his novels do

not deal with "national" subjects, and the latter because readers abroad

see in his works only an unoriginal and slavish imitation of European

models. Latin America's much-discussed "cultural lag" only serves to

exacerbate the dilemma of nationalism versus universality.29

Our discussion of this classic dichotomy is complicated somewhat by

the lack of a clear-cut definition of exactly what constitutes a "national"

literature. Is there really a "national" literature in each of Spanish

America's twenty nations? Vargas Llosa, for example, denies the existence

of twenty coherent, well-formed national literatures in the twenty

Spanish-speaking republics of America. He believes that there is

sufficient basis for considering all of Spanish American literature

as a whole--a coherent, cohesive body.' He bases this opinion on what

he considers a common denominator of historical, cultural and social

experiences which give the Spanish American region a definable, though

highly diverse, literary personality.30 Gabriel Garcia M6rquez goes

even further, advocating no division between Spanish (peninsular) and

Spanish American literatures. He bases his suggestion on the fact that,

due to a common language and cultural heritage, Don Quixote and the

medieval novels of chivalry (for example) are as much a part of the

literary heritage of Spanish America as they are of Spain. Likewise,

Rub6n Darto is as much a part of the poetic heritage of Spain as of

Spanish America.3" However, despite this evident ambiguity in the

definition of what constitutes a "national" literature, normally, one

would understand the term to signify a literature that springs from and

deals with the social, political, moral and psychological problems, and









the common cultural heritage of a given geographical region or a clearly

defined national territory.

On the nationalist-universalist polemic, the novelists defend a broad

spectrum of ideas with many blends and shades of distinction. There is a

tendency to regard the conflict as foolish and improperly stated. For

such novelists the terms should not be mutually exclusive, but rather

a synthesis of two desirable positions.

Attacking the old idea of national literature, Ernesto SMbato sounds

a call that is echoed by many of today's novelists: in order for a

literature to be national, it does not have to be a realistic or pseudo-

realistic portrayal of life in one's country. Nor does it have to be a

"picturesque" literature, depicting in colorful, charming vignettes

domestic tranquillity and happiness in the manner of the nineteenth-century

costumbristas. Nor does it have the obligation of being clear, concise,

simple, and easily grasped by the average reader. Literature can be

"national" if it is subjective, difficult, complicated, introspective,

gloomy, and critical of its own country, even seemingly antinationalistic.

A nation is infinitely complex and impossible to understand in clear

and easy terms and categories, so why, insists S6bato, should a literature

that aspires to capture the essences of that nation not be equally complex

and varied? Sdbato believes that, taking Argentina for example, many.

novels'and many novelists will be necessary before anything approaching

a complete view of Argentina's chaotic, entangled, contradictory reality

can be achieved through literature--that is, before Argentina can lay

claim to a true "national" literature.32 And this interpretation of

"national" literature not only must be open to all the disparate, con-









tradictory realities, both pleasant and unpleasant, which go into making

up the total reality of the nation,3 but it must also be prepared to

recognize as "national" literature that which fiercely attacks and

tears the nation apart.34

The Cuban novelist Alejo Carpentier is far less accommodating on this

subject. He rejects outright the old-fashioned tipicista novels--those

which attempted to depict that which is "typical" and unique in Spanish

American societies, the novel otherwise termed criollista. The Mexican

Indian, the Venezuelan plainsman, the Argentine gaucho--all these and more

became the novelistic material of idealized, folkloric, often picturesque

portraits of Spanish American life with exotic tropical birds, trees,

plants, flowers and animals, whose names were almost as foreign to the

Latin American reader as they were to his European or North American

counterpart. Thus, many of these novels were accompanied by a glossary

of American flora and fauna. Carpentier echoes the sentiments of his

contemporaries when he characterizes these attempts at self-identification

as early manifestations of literary nationalism and as elements of the

tipicista novel which no longer hold any attraction for the contemporary

novelist. For it is not through pointing out objects and human types

which somehow are unique to a given time and place that a novelist

should approach the task of creating a national literature. Rather, it

is by looking beyond the superficial differences of Spanish American man

to discover the universal experience of all men, everywhere, in Spanish

America. Having established Spanish American man as a universally

recognizable human being, the "typical" traits which distinguish him on

the surface take on their proper perspective. Thus, for Carpentier,









Spanish American man's universality is the dominant factor in literature

today.35s

Cortazar finds the question of a writer's cultural authenticity

vague and inconclusive. Just what is understood by autochthonouss"

America, he asks. Certainly not much in Argentina. The term, strictly

interpreted, is far too limiting for literature. In support of this view,

he recalls that Borges once asked an intransigent indigenista why instead

of having his books printed he did not have them published in the form

of quipus. For Cortdzar, all writers are autochthonous, even if the

subjects of their work seem unrelated to those themes which folklorists

regard as the identifying elements of their cultures. For the essence

of being autochthonouss" ("indigenous" or "national") is to write works

which the nation to which the author belongs will recognize as a direct

offshoot of its culture, whether or not that nation and its traditions

play a part in the work. Furthermore, national identity must be an outlet,

an opening, and not a limitation. That is why Cortazar regards Gabriel

*GarcTa Marquez's Cien anos de soledad as one of the most admirable novels

*ever written- in Spanish America-the book is incredibly Colombian, he

says, simply because it is so much more besides. Garcia Mdrquez goes

beyond the autochthonous, making room for an all-encompassing view of

the people who.inhabit the novel. It is this wider view that gives the

particular view (the local or national identity) credibility and authen-

ticity. Autochthony, Cortdzar concludes, underlies national, regional

or local identities; providing the author is a truly "national" writer,

that identity will show through no matter what his work deals with or

where it takes place. 3









SMbato agrees with Cortazar that autochthony is more difficult for

an Argentine or Uruguayan than it is for Peruvians or Mexicans, who have

a long indigenous past.37 Argentina is a rootless nation, a melting

pot whose identity is more European than American ("Una vieja boutade

dice que los mexicanos descienden de los aztecas, los peruanos de los

incas y los rioplatenses de los barcos "38).. So for the Argentine,

autochthony lacks a clearly definable national identity. Cortdzar says

that this must be taken as a positive rather than a negative asset-as

the signal to move unencumbered into new territory to search for modern

Argentina's identity, untrammeled by traditional nationalistic pre-

occupations about gauchos, the pampa or the Indians.3

In the polemic of national versus universal literature, S6bato sees

an inherent sense of cultural inferiority among Spanish Americans. He

believes that Spanish America has for so long been under the literary

influence of Europe, imitating whatever literary styles emanated from

the European capitals, that now, in their attempt to establish their own

identity, some Spanish American authors seek an originality devoid of

European influence. That says Sabato, is a sign of literary immaturity

,and nalvetd. For in literature there can be no absolute originality,

simply because it is impossible to write in a vacuum. Literature, like

all other human endeavors, growsand develops predicated on what preceded

it. He points out that all great writers of all cultures have "influ-

ences" that can be traced to other writers and other nations. The mark

of maturity in Spanish American writers will be achieved when they can

accept their European heritage without embarrassment or feelings of

inferiority, and go on from there to build a literature which will be









uniquely Spanish American."o For the Cuban novelist Jos4 Lezama Lima,

Sfbato's evaluation of this inferiority complex is entirely valid.

Lezama notes that the crux of this cultural quandary stems from the

vague impression which somehow plagues the Latin American artist that

he is incapable of achieving the artistic level of perfection of his

European counterpart. The Spanish American writer views his art form

not as a formaa alcanzada, sino [como] problematismo, cosa a resolver"-

not an accomplished art form but a problem to be solved. And the Spanish

American artist seeks to hide what he perceives as inadequate formal

expression under the umbrella of autochthony."

Ernesto Sabato, whose chief preoccupation in his novels is existen-

tial, regards man-the individual-and his human condition as the link

between the national and universal levels. Loneliness, the ultimate

meaning of man's existence, death-these are things which haunt all men,

not just Argentines, Mexicans or Venezuelans.42 And although they are

universal problems, recognizable to readers all over the world, they are

problems which begin with one man, and can be studied by focusing the

novel's attention on one man in a given time and place. The "here and

now," as Sabato says, is the key to investigating the human condition.

The only possibility that an author has of achieving universality in

his works is by digging deeply into that which is closest to him.43

Miguel Angel Asturias44 and Colombia's Eduardo Caballero Calder6ns4

both echo Sabato's position: the novelist must move from the particular

to the universal. Asturias thinks the writer's literary vision and scope

should be constantly expanding, but that he should always begin with

that which he knows best. In such a synthesis lies the solution to the

whole problem.









Cort6zar, who, as we have seen, is often accused in Argentina of

being a "non-Argentine" writer, of turning his back on his native country,

regards himself as very Argentine. He attributes the disagreement to a

confusion (common to all. Latin American nations) between national

literature and literary nationalism. The latter is what the "patrioteros"

demand-a literature which constantly has Argentina as its theme. The

former is literature produced by Argentines,' which, whether or not it

has Argentina as its explicit theme and setting, will always bear the

mark of the author's Argentinian spiritual and cultural values. .This

is a far deeper and more meaningful literary "Argentinism" than that

demanded by literary nationalists.46 As examples, Cortdzar points to

the novels of Rulfo, Asturias and Vargas Llosa. Their works, though

set very firmly in Mexico, Guatemala and Peru, deal with questions which

transcend the frontiers of their particular nations. Cortdzar refers to

their "potenciaci6n creadora de su medio ambiente"-the creative energiz-

ing or giving vitality to their environment. The key word here is creative.

Taking the landscapes and people familiar to them, these writers infuse

them with the creative genius or inspiration which is the mark of the

gifted novelist. It is this "potenciaci6n creadora"-this fusing of the

artist's vitality and personal experiences and perceptions with reality

which creates a truly "national" literature.4'

In synthesis, then, the novelists almost unanimously proclaim that

the solution to the national-universal dilemma is to be found by going

to the individual-the Spanish American individual to be sure-and writing

about him in such a way that a Japanese, a Norwegian or an Ethiopian would

be capable of identifying with his situations, problems and emotions.









.The Latin American author's view.today must reach out beyond'his

national borders, for, returning to Octavio Paz's dictum, Latin American

man is today the contemporary of all men. And that, says Fuentes, is

the essence of being a Latin American today.'" It is the depth of the

author's view that matters, not the surface area he covers. In this

context, one remembers Ernesto S6bato's assertion that there is only one

valid literary dilemma: profound literature versus superficial litera-

ture."9 If literature is deep, it will be automatically "national,"

for it will go to the heart of the nation and its people. Or, as Alejo

Carpentier put it: "...the view the. Latin American intellectual has over

the world is one of the vastest, most complete and universal man has ever

had. For me the American continent is the most extraordinary world of

the century, because of its all-embracing cultural scope. Our view of

it must be ecumenic."50 In conclusion, we may cite Carlos Fuentes, who

chose as the editorial principle of the Revista Mexicana de Literatura,

which-he founded, the legend "a culture can be profitably national only

when it is generously universal."s5


Models and Forerunners of the Contemporary
Spanish American Novel

The last major section of our introductory chapter deals with the

characteristics and elements which make up the new novel in Spanish

America-an attempt to generalize certain tendencies which will be seen

repeatedly in many of the contemporary authors'.works, plus some of the

novelists' general observations and thoughts on the novel. In this

connection, it seems useful to us to discuss some models or forerunners









of the contemporary novel. We have purposely omitted the word "influences,"

for tracing literary influences does not fall within the scope of our

study. Thus, what follows are simply several literary trends which will

receive more detailed attention in later chapters. It should be pointed

out that the contemporary Spanish American novelists have relatively

little to say in-their theoretical writings about literary "influences"

or models.

Carlos Fuentes, in his discussion of the death of the realistic,

bourgeois novel,52.states that trends in twentieth-century .literature

and art have helped the old realism along on this road to its extinction

and ushered in the new, experimental forms of artistic expression which

eventually led to the contemporary Spanish American novel. The.modern

artist's views of reality have been wider, more all-encompassing and more

subjective. Fuentes mentions Kafka, Picasso, Joyce, Brecht, Artaud,

Eisenstein and Pirandello as major contemporary innovators in Europe.

In Latin America, the transition from the descriptive novel to the more

open, more innovative novel was first taken by the novelists who recorded

the epic of the Mexican Revolution.53 However, Fuentes credits two

Uruguayan and two.Argentine short-story writers-Horacio Quiroga,

Felisberto Hernandez, Macedonio Fern6ndez and Roberto Arlt-with a more

significant innovation, without stating precisely what their contributions

were. However, he discusses in detail the contributions of two writers-

whom he considers have truly turned the Spanish American novel around

and headed it in a new direction-Argentina's Jorge Luis Borges and

Guatemala's Miguel Angel Asturias. Asturias, while retaining as subject

matter the same worn-out themes of social oppression and political protest,









changed the social document into an artistic creation through the

addition and skillful use of myth and language. Borges, in Fuentes'

opinion, is the first Spanish American prose-writer to claim the right

to write in a deeply personal style, creating an entirely independent,

intellectualized, private, mythical world, not dependent on external

reality (although the poets Vicente Huidobro, Pablo Neruda and Octavio

Paz had done the same previously in poetry). And, the Argentinian is

also the first fully urban narrative writer in Spanish America.5s

The Borgian idea of constructing an imaginary world is echoed by

Peru's Mario Vargas Llosa, who names the four novelists whom he considers

to be the foremost initiators of the new novel in Europe and the United

States: James Joyce, Marcel Proust, Franz Kafka and William Faulkner.

Vargas Llosa is particularly attracted to Faulkner's imaginary

Yoknapatawpha County, a fictional world which could be located in Peru

or Colombia as easily as in Mississippi.55

Perhaps the most interesting literary "model" which any of the

novelists recognizes is discussed by Vargas Llosa, who says that the

closest parallel to what the contemporary novelists of Spanish America

are trying to do today is to be found in the medieval chivalric novels

of Europe. These novels of chivalry were "total" works, in the sense

they attempted a total depiction .of society. Vargas Llosa traces the

contemporary novelists' goal of the "total novel" (see Chapter III) to

these medieval chivalric novels, and credits the chivalric novel with

providing him with the "total" approach for his first two novels, La

ciudad y los perros and La casa verde.56









This brief account of'sources.or models and forerunners.leads us

to characterize briefly the contemporary novel. If we examine the

novelists' statements on these characteristics and elements, the ideals

and self-imposed guides of the novelists will be clarified.


Elements and Characteristics of the Contemporary
Spanish American Novel

To begin with, S6bato defines the novel as a genre in the following

schematic form:57

(1) It is a partially fictional story, but may contain elements of

true history.

(2) It is a type of spiritual creation in which, unlike a scientific

or philosophical creation, ideas do not appear in their pure state but

are instead mixed with the feelings and passions of the characters.

(3) It is a type of creation in which, unlike science and philosophy,

there is no attempt to prove anything: the novel does not demonstrate, it

shows ("la novela no demuestra, sino muestra").

(4) It is a (partially) invented story in which human beings called

"characters" appear. According to the era, the taste and mentality of

the times, these characters range from solid, corporeal beings who closely

resemble those we see daily in the streets, to transparent individuals

sometimes designated only by mysterious initials (as in Kafka's The Trial)

who seem to be merely the bearers of certain ideas or psychological states.

(5) It is a description, an investigation, an examination of the

drama of man, his condition and his existence. For there are no novels

about objects or animals but invariably about men.









.Sabato concludes that he believes that anything more specific than

these general statements would pin down the novel too closely, limit

its wide-ranging artistic potential and force it to conform to arti-

ficially imposed standards or characteristics.

Alejo Carpentier analyzes the problem of novel-writing in terms of

what he calls the contextos of Latin American reality..5 Carpentier

believes the writer should simply create the characters and then let

them loose to act and react within these contexts. The result, he

affirms, will yield a truthful portrayal in artistic terms of Latin

American reality. We should point out that Carpentier is the only

contemporary novelist who employs the concept of contexts in his

theoretical statements on the novel. The contexts which form the basis

for Carpentier's novels'are:59

(1) racial contexts: men of one nationality but of different races-

white, Indian, black-live together in Latin America, sometimes ages

apart in cultural development; intermarriage of these races has produced

a large multiracial population.

(2) economic contexts: chronic instability of national economies,.

due to one or two natural resources in great abundance (usually in foreign

hands), which leads to boom-.and-bust cycles.

(3) "ctonic" contexts ("contextos ct6nicos"): survival of animism,

ancient beliefs and practices, often from very respectable cultural

sources, which help link certain present realities with remote cultural

essences, the existence of which links us with "lo u6iversal-sin-tiempo."

For example, the appearance, in numerous churches in Latin America, of

ornate baroque angels playing the maracas; or Heitor Villa-Lobos'









Bachianas.Brasileiras--cases of synthesis of long-existent Latin American

cultural manifestations with contemporary practices. Or perhaps a better

example: the survival of melodic elements of the Romance de Gerineldo

in the popularCuban song "La Guantanamera." In other words, elements

of the (sometimes subconscious) past surfacing to mix-with or to help

explain the present.

(4) political contexts: Latin American nations are historically

unstable (with few exceptions), and have large and influential military

sectors whose only reason for being is not to fight wars but to meddle

in running the nation's affairs.

(5) bourgeois contexts: within the growing middle class of Latin

America, there is a good bit of mobility, but there is downward as well

as upward mobility, and the middle-class citizen is therefore constantly

at the mercy of the country's uncertain economy.

(6) contexts of distance and proportion: the American continent is

huge and violent-distances are immense, everything is oversized (the Andes,

the Amazon, the pampas, etc.) and the continent is subject to periodic

natural cataclysms, such as volcanoes, hurricanes, tornadoes, earthquakes,

tidal waves, landslides and floods. Unlike Europe, nature in America is

untamed (hence the "novel of the land" that dominated Spanish American

literature for nearly a century).

(7) contexts of chronological disorientation ("desajuste cronol6gico"):

a cultural "lag" has always plagued Latin America, particularly in litera-

ture and the arts. For example, Cubism began to be understood and

practiced by artists in Spanish America at a time when it was already

pass in Europe. Literary movements have historically come to Latin

America many years after their initiation abroad.









(8) cultural contexts: Charles Pdguy once bragged that he never

read a book by anyone other than French authors. Carpentier states that

for a Frenchman, that is quite possible, for French culture is universal.

But a Spanish American cannot limit his knowledge to Hispanic culture,

for it has glaring shortcomings and lacks universality. Spanish and

Spanish American literature are simply not as representative of

universal literary movements as French literature. So the Latin American

intellectual must of necessity acquaint himself with other cultures and

other literatures, in order not to leave gaps in his erudition. For

this reason, Carpentier believes (as we have previously seen) that today's

novelist in Spanish America has the widest, most universal view of man

that any writer in the world can claim.

(9) culinary contexts: important due to their particular historical

contexts-the blending of Spanish cooking with local Spanish American-

cooking resulted in the criollo.cuisine in many regions of Spanish America.

(10) contexts of illumination: light.and shadow modify perspective,

and the great variety of Latin American geography produces an infinite

variety of light, from the diaphanous mountain atmosphere of Mexico City

to the shimmering tropical light of Rio de Janeiro and Havana.

(11) ideological contexts: these are powerful and ever-present,

but must never be allowed to become the focus of the novel, for then the

novel becomes a sermon. An economist or sociologist's report, with photo-

graphs and statistics, on the deplorable conditions in the tin mines of

Bolivia is far more useful than a novel about those same conditions.60

These, then, are the "contexts" (or basic elements) which the

Spanish American'novelist must keep in mind ashe creates his novel.









With these contexts and Ernesto Sabato's general characteristics of the

novel in mind, we turn again to Sbato. who outlines nine general

characteristics which distinguish the contemporary Spanish American

novel:61

(1) descent into the "I" ("descenso al yo"): unlike the writers of

the nineteenth century, who attempted to objectively describe the physical

world outside man, today's novelist turns his vision inward to the pri-

mordial mystery of.his own existence.

(2) interior time: traditional narrative fiction was based on a

fixed concept of time-chronological, astronomical time which is

measurable by a clock. Today's writer, as he takes the plunge into

his own inner self, must abandon chronological time, because the "I"

(el yo) operates on a concept of time which is measured not in hours

and minutes but rather in anguished periods of waiting, in chronologically

unmeasurable experiences of happiness, grief or ecstasy.

(3) the subconscious: in his descent to the "I," the novelist not

only must face the subjectivity already known in literature since the

romantic period, but the depths of man's subconscious and unconscious mind.

The author's submersion into these shadowy zones often produces a ghost-

like quality which resembles dreams and nightmares. The characters

often are poorly defined, imprecise, and unreal. In this area, the law

of light and reason is supplanted by the law of the shadows.

(4) illogicality: logic, cause-and-effect, coherence, clarity,

and reason-the bases of the natural sciences, which were in turn the

basis of nineteenth-century realism-naturalism in literature-all lose

their validity in the nocturnal world of man's subconscious.





30



(5) the world seen through the "I": the old division between sub-

ject and object disappears. With it goes the old-style novelist's

concept of the world and "scenery," which was the idea that they, like

the theatrical scenery in a stage production, existed independently from

the characters. In the contemporary novel, the scene (scenery) arises

out of the subject along with his state of mind, his visions, feelings

and ideas.

(6) the Other ("el Otro"): as modern man has plunged into his own

psyche, he has discovered the Other, the double, the reverse side of him-

self, difficult to describe or define, but always present in the back of

the character's mind.

(7) communion: the modern novelist, unlike his nineteenth-century

predecessor, lacks a superhuman point of view (the novelist as omnis-

cient, omnipresent demi-god) and is faced with characters who experience

life from their very limited, subjective inner consciences. Thus today's

novel comes face to face with one of man's most anguishing problems-

loneliness and human communication.

(8) sacred sense ("sentido") of the body: since man's conscious and-

subconscious-the "I"-do not exist in a pure state but rather are un-

avoidably contained in man's body, the attempt at communion between souls

is often disastrous or frustrated. Thus, for the first time in the his-

tory of literature, sex acquires a metaphysical dimension. Sexual love,

unlike either sentimental or pornographic love in the traditional novel,

becomes a sacred act as a consequence of its attempt to establish a

bridge of communication between individuals.









(9) knowledge: today's novel has acquired the new dignity of being

a vehicle of knowledge. As long as pure science was considered the only

vehicle adequate for obtaining knowledge, literature was relegated to the

secondary status of entertainment, artifice, or an object of ideal beauty.

But when contemporary man began to realize that reality was not restricted

to the physical world, that it included man's feelings and emotions as

well, then literature became as valid an epistemological instrument as

any other., In fact, today it is perhaps the best instrument for probing

into the deeper recesses of man's mind.

SMbato concludes by stating that the contemporary novel not only

gives a more complete account of today's complex world, but has also

taken on a metaphysical dimension it did not have before. It explores

territory which the traditional novelist did not even suspect, and it

has acquired philosophical and cognitive dignity. For these reasons,

the novel is certainly not dead or in decline, but entering one of its

most vigorous, productive eras. Paraguay's Augusto Roa Bastos agrees,

stating that the prime characteristic of today's novel is precisely the

annexation of man's interior world, as described by Sabato. This opening

up of man's inner self in the novel is important because it is dealt

with on the esthetic level, and because the investigation into a

character's inner existence does not cut him off or isolate him from

his social context or milieu. Even those literary forms which seem

farthest removed from the surrounding reality, such as the so-called

"fantastic" literature, are really only a metaphorical restatement of

reality.62









Other novelists offer less schematically organized characterizations

of the "new novel." Fuentes, for example, sees,the new novel in terms of

its expansion into territories that it had never known before, specifi-

cally myth and prophecy; the alliance of imagination and criticism;

ambiguity, humor, and parody, in addition to a major restructuring of

language.63

It is interesting to contrast the characteristics listed by SAbato

and Fuentes with those of Miguel Angel Asturias, one of the early con-

temporary novelists. Asturias lists as characteristics of the new novel

the use of conversational language based on popular speech patterns,

creativity based on primitive beliefs and practices, the introduction

of personified nature, telluricc impulse" impulseo telurico), and a

type of verbal magic unknown before.6" As one of the first innovators

of Spanish American fiction, it is not surprising that Asturias' list

Sis less in the vanguard, less revolutionary than that of other writers.

(It is also interesting-and predictable-that each novelist lists as

"characteristics" of the new novel those which reflect the qualities of

his own works.)

Speaking of the novel as a metaphysical investigation of man, Sdbato

calls to mind John Donne's statement that no man sleeps in the cart which

carries him from the jail to the scaffold where he is to be executed, yet

we all sleep from the womb to the grave, or we are not entirely awake.

One of the principal missions of great literature, Sabato says, is to

awaken man as he travels to the scaffold-to shock him into awareness

of his condition as a finite human being.65










Julio Cortdzar agrees. Early in the history of the narrative, the

novel sought to show us man as he was; the nineteenth-century novel sought

to show us what he was like; the contemporary novel asks the why and the

wherefore (el por que y el para que) of man's existence. The novel is

the most adequate literary vehicle for the artistic realization of

man as a person, as an individual (el hombre como persona), and this

in-depth human focus is the reason.for the wide popularity and readership

that have greeted the new novel.66 Cort6zar also points out as one of

the salient features of the new novel that (as we have already seen)

when writers such as Rulfo, Asturias, Vargas Llosa and Garcia Mgrquez

return to the geographical reality of their native countries for the setting

of their novels, what results is'not the old descriptive realism but a

"potenciaci6n creadora de su medio ambiente"-a subjective, inner-

oriented interpretation (as opposed to description) of the natural

surroundings.67

Two final characteristics' of the contemporary novel in Spanish America

are the concepts of the total novel and the open novel. According to

these concepts, the novel should give as complete a view as possible

of the multiple planes of reality of a very complex world. In order to

do so, the novel must be open to all sorts of innovations, including

many aspects which heretofore had been considered non-literary. But

in the view of today's novelists, if something is within the realm of

human experience, then it is, by definition, narrative material, for the

novel must be open to the expression of all human experience and not just

.selective portions of it. The Cuban novelist Jos6 Lezama Lima typifies

today's writers when he says: "La novela americana significa para









nosotros algo que ni es novela ni es americana, sino el relate supraverbo

de lo entrevisto, la fiesta del nacimiento de nuevos sentidos. Si no es

novela, que es esto, exclaman. Hacer una obra que fuerce la aceptaci6n,

que obliga a que se la traguen como novela."68

In connection with Lezama's remark, we shall examine in detail in

Chapter II the linguistic revolution of the new novel. The problem of

language is at the center of just about every contemporary Spanish American

novelist's novelistic concerns. This linguistic revolution, along with

most of the other characteristics which help delineate the contours of

the contemporary novel, has its roots in Modernism. As Ivan A. Schulman

has pointed out,69 the contemporary mood of disorientation in a confusing

and complicated society; introspection and a turning inside oneself; the

acute realization of man's solitude; a profound metaphysical concern

often leading to existential anguish; a feeling of futility and

pessimism; and the linguistic and stylistic innovations leading to new

forms of expression-these are all key elements of the new novel which

had their beginnings in the Modernist movement at the turn of the

twentieth century. Thus, today's "new" novel is really a stage in the

continuing evolution begun by the Modernist renovation in the Hispanic

world.









NOTES

'Carlos Fuentes, La nueva novela hispanoamericana, 2nd ed.
(Mexico: Joaqufn Mortiz, 1969); pp. 16-17.

2Ibid., pp. 17-18.

'We are defining the traditional novel as that which appeared between
1816, the date of publication of Jos6 Joaqufn Fernandez de Lizardi's El
periquillo sarniento, the first Spanish American novel, and 1947, the
date of appearance of Agustfn Ygiei's Al filo del agua.

4Alejo Carpentier illustrates the point by his early novel iEcue-
Yambo-O!, in which he attempted to portray the life and plight of the poor
Negro population of Cuba. Years later, Carpentier regretfully realized
that his book was mere costumbrismo, superficial at best, for he had not
penetrated into the characters in enough detail to make them live as
people. They were mere symbols of their class and race. Alejo Carpentier,
Tientos y diferencias (Montevideo: ARCA, 1967), pp. 11-12.

SCarlos Fuentes, op. cit., pp. 9-10.

6Ibid., p. 11.

7Augusto Roa Bastos, "Imagen y perspectives de la narrative
latinoamericana actual," Temas (Montevideo), June-July .1965, pp. 3-12.

,"Somos, por primera vez en nuestra historic, contempor6neos de
todos los hombres." Octavio Paz, Laberinto de la soledad (Mexico: Fondo
de Cultura Econ6mica, 1964), p. 150.

9Fuentes, op. cit., pp. 34-35.

l"Ibid., p. 67.

"Luis Harss and Barbara Dohmann, Into the Mainstream (New York:
Harper and Row, 1967), p. 307.

"Mario Vargas Llosa et al'., Antologla lmnima del. Vargas Llsa
(Buenos Aires: Tiempo Contempordneo, 1969), pp. 125-126.
"Fuentes, op. cit., p. 36.

"We will return to the urban aspect of the novel in Chapter IV.

'IHarss, op. cit., p. 306.
'6Ernesto Sibato, El escritor y sus fantasmas, 2nd ed. (Buenos
Aires: Aguilar, 1964), p. 8.









Ibid., p. 12. See Chapter IV for a more detailed discussion of
the writer's obligation to his society.

'"JoaquTn A. Santana, "La vuelta a Cortazar en 80 rounds," Bohemia
(Cuba), Feb. 26, 1971, pp. 7-8.

"Julio Cortgzar, Ultimo round (Mexico: Siglo XXI, 1969), pp.
210-212, planta baja."

20Ibid., p. 212, planta baja."

21Rita Guibert, Seven Voices, trans; Frances Partridge (New York:
Vintage Books, 1973), p. 137.
22Ibid., pp. 137-138.

3Carlos Fuentes, "Hopscotch," Commentary, Oct. 1966, p. 142.

24Carlos Fuentes, "Situaci6n del escritor en America Latina," Mundo
Nuevo, July.1966,'pp. 8-9,

25Santana, op. cit., p. 7.

26Guibert, op. cit., p. 137.

27Ibid.

28Ibid., pp. 334-335.

29Fuentes, La nueva novela hispanoamericana, p. 23.

"3Ernesto Gonzalez Bermejo, Cosas de escritores (Montevideo: Marcha
1971), p. 60.

31Jose Domingo, "Entrevistas: Gabriel Garcia M6rquez," Insula,
June 1968, p. 6.

32Sabato, op. cit., pp. 37-38.

33Ibid., pp. 39-40.

"Ibid., pp. 176-177..
"Carpentier, op. cit., pp. 10-11, 37.

36Guibert, op. cit., pp. 300-301.

37Sdbato, op. cit., pp. 37-38.

"Fuentes, La nueva novela hispanoamericana, p. 25.









"Gonzalez Bermejo, op; cit., pp. 101-102.
4 Sgbato, op. cit., pp. 31-32.

4'Jose Lezama Lima, La expresi6n americana (Havana: Instituto
Naciona- de Cultura, 195777 p. 18.

"Ernesto Sabato, "Por una novela novelesca y metaffsica," Mundo
Nuevo, Nov. 1966, p. 10.

"3Cesar Tiempo, "41 preguntas a Ernesto SMbato," Indice, 21,
No. 206, p. 16.

"Guibert, op. cit., pp.. 137-138.
"'Various, "Encuesta: La novela en America Latina," Cuadernos,
Sept. 1964, p. 6.

'6Harss, op. cit., pp. 237-238.

"Edelmiro S. Castellanos, "Cortdzar habla sobre Cortazar y otros
temas," El Mundo del Domingo (Suplemento), Jan. 15, 1967, p. 7..

"'Fuentes, "Situaci6n del escritor en America Latina," p. 9.

"SSabato, El escritor y sus fantasmas, p. 38.

S5Harss, op. cit., p. 44.

s5Quoted in Harss, op. cit., p. 281.

52Fuentes, La nueva novela hispanoamericana, pp. 16-19.

53We shall discuss this aspect at length in Chapter III under the
section titled "ambiguity."

S"Fuentes, La nueva novel hispanoamericana, pp. 24-26. Both of
these trends will be examined in greater detail in subsequent chapters.

"s"Mario Vargas Llosa," (interview by Kal Wagenheim), Caribbean
Review, Spring 1969, p. 4.
56Vargas Llosa et al., Antologra minima de M. Vargas Llosa, pp.
140-143.

5S"bato, El escritor y sus fantasmas, pp. 151-152.

"The term "context" is borrowed by Carpentier from Jean-Paul
Sartre.









"Carpentier, op. cit., pp. 19-34.

e6The authors' social and political commitment will be further
discussed in Chapter IV.

6Sabato, El escritor y sus fantasmas, pp. 86-89.

62Roa Bastos, Qp. cit., pi 11.

63Fuentes, La nueva novela hispanoamericana, p. 24.
64Jos6 Corrales Egea, "Una charla con Miguel Angel Asturias," Insula,
Sept. 15, 1953, p. 4.

6Sabato, El escritor y sus fantasmas, p. 90.

"Julio Cortdzar, "Situaci6n de la novela," Cuadernos Americanos.
July-August 1950, pp. 227-228..

67Castellanos, op. cit., p. 7.

68Reynaldo Gonzalez, "Un pulpo en una jarra minoana," (interview with
Jos6 Lezama Lima), La Gaceta de Cuba, Sept. 1969, p. 15.

"Ivan A. Schulman, "Pervivencias del modernismo en la novela
contemporgnea: exposici6n de una teorla epocal," in Variaciones interpreta-
tivas en torno a la nueva narrative hispanoamericana, ed. Donald W.
Bleznick (Santiago de Chile: Univers-taria, 1972 pp. 32-33.













CHAPTER II

LANGUAGE AND THE CONTEMPORARY NOVEL


One of the most evident characteristics of the contemporary

Spanish American novel is its linguistic experimentation. The language

.of the new novel is at the base of and the direct consequence of the

novelists' search for new directions. The traditionally structured

forms of the Spanish language have given way in the works of many authors

to unorthodox forms of language, often disconcerting to the uninitiated

reader-which is sometimes the author's objective in such experimentation.

In this chapter, we will investigate the language the novelists use

and the rationale they develop for their new linguistic forms.


The Need for a New Language

Carlos Fuentes' contention is that Spanish America lacks a language

of its own.' The Spanish spoken in Spanish America is an imported

language, not a native product. It is the end result of the "breach"

of the Spanish conquest and colonization and the imposition of an

oppressive, hierarchical social and political order. The Counter-Reform-

ation destroyed the one great chance for modernization of Spanish society

and its language, not only in Spain but also in its American colonies.

Stunted in its modern evolution, the Spanish language for Fuentes is

a false language which conceals reality. The Spanish which first came

to America was that of the Renaissance. It was a language which hid the

medieval nature of this great colonial undertaking, just as it hid the









shame of the encomienda system under the guise of the Laws of the Indies.

The'"enlightened" language of the Independence movement concealed the

fact that Spanish America's feudal structure remained intact. Only the

leadership changed. The positivistic language of nineteenth-century

liberalism added neo-colonialism in the form of economic dependency as

Spanish America fell" into foreign hands. And the liberal language of

the recently demised Alliance for Progress disguised the continuing

economic servitude of Latin America to the developed capitalist countries.

In his own Mexico, Fuentes sees the language of the Mexican Revolution

hiding the present-day realities of the counter-revolution. And

ultimately, the presence, particularly in the large cities of Latin

America, of the beginnings of a consumer society is fed by the mass

media, whose interests are divorced from the realities of Latin American

society. Thus, from its birth to the present day, Spanish America has

lacked a truly authentic, non-dependent language-one which reflects

the deep, untainted structures of Spanish American life and experience.2

Hence, the basic need of today's Spanish American novelist is to invent

a language capable of expressing what has been left unsaid or deformed

in more than four centuries of existence since the "breach" of the con-

quest. Latin America is a continent of "sacred texts"; it cries out for

a profanation which can give.voice to her complexities-a language of her

own. A vertically structured, hierarchical, even feudal language cannot

speak adequately except for a small segment of Latin American society

today.3 Thus, the contemporary novelist's role as a linguis.t is at

bottom a revolutionary one; he must ofnecessity go against the grain

of the established order. To go against the established order creates









a crisis situation, one which Fuentes finds not only fitting but

necessary.'

Ernesto Sabato deals more directly with American Spanish.'s sub-

servience to its Castilian prototype. S6bato, in discussing the question

of originality in the Spanish American novel, insists that the Spanish

language is a formidable cultural heritage which not only should not be

denied but treasured. But to treasure it does not mean to lock it inside

an air-tight glass case and shield it from change. Like all cultural

inheritances, language is broadened and enriched by its inheritors,

and to seek to freeze it or petrify it is to kill it. Just as

Sarmiento and Marti, in the nineteenth century, and Ruben Darfo at the

beginning of the twentieth century, were instrumental in reshaping the

language, so-must today's writers be free to do the same.5

SMbato points to Spain's continuing dominance over American Spanish.

In Spain, he states, the Royal.Spanish Academy of the Language exercises

its dictatorial sway. But in Spanish America, the.ordinary citizen is

often more self-conscious linguistically and dramatically than his

Spanish counterpart, falling victim to a centuries-old cultural prestige.6

Spain continues to exercise her linguistic tyranny over her former

colonies.

This desire to adhere to a fixed form in language arises from a

naive belief in that particular language's insuperable perfection. Such

supposed perfection naturally carries with it enormous cultural prestige.

The idea of the language's perfection arises in great measure from the

works of the classic writers who have helped shape the language. Spain

has a rich literary heritage that includes, among others, Garcilaso de









la Vega, Quevedo, Lope de Vega, Calder6n de la Barca, Tirso de Molina, and

ultimately, the incomparable Cervantes. In light of such an impressive

list, "classical" peninsular Spanish's prestige in Spanish America is

understandable. But Satabo insists that the "good usage" inspired by

such writers is questionable. He cites as an example a classical text

which reads: "...hoy hacen, seror, segin mi.cuenta, un mes y cuatro dias..."

Sabato confirms, by searching in Spanish grammars, his suspicion that

this phrase contains a basic mistake-an inadmissable error in agreement,

showing a grievous lack of grammatical knowledge on the part of the

author; But since the phrase comes from Cervantes, the grammatical

norms are put in question. Grammarians would no doubt find some

justification for Cervantes' error, and probably even condone the

error as an "exception acceptable due to.good Osage." That notorious

"good usage" is very easy to establish several centuries later, when

history has confirmed Cervantes as a literary genius. For such gram-

matical mistakes are like coups d'4tat: if a coup fails, it is referred

to as a sinister attempt against the duly constituted authority; if it

succeeds, it becomes the date of a national celebration and a model to

be followed. The same principle holds true with Cervantes' "...hoy

hacen...". The important point is that, when he wrote the line,

Cervantes committed an inexcusable grammatical mistake. Likewise,

today's writers in Spanish America-the classics of tomorrow-must be

free to make similar "mistakes," to turn the Spanish language in new

directions, for they are setting the norms for the next hundred years."

In conclusion, Sibato attacks the "academic" dictum, resurrected

every so often, that, just as the "best" English is supposedly spoken'









in Oxford, so the "best" Spanish is supposedly spoken in Toledo. Toledo,

.thus, would represent the absolute seat of authority and correctness of

the Spanish language, and the poor mortals who inhabit the outer

reaches of the Spanish empire would be eternally condemned to babble

monstrous dialects of the mother tongue. This is simply not the case,

for each region or nation lends its own genius or "soul" to the language

it speaks, molding it in subtle ways, adapting it to its own forms of

life and'civilization. This process is one of enrichment and not

impoverishment. And it-is shaped by that region's poets, its prose-

writers, and even by the children playing in its streets. The idea of

a "fixed" or "perfect" language, then, is a totally invalid concept.'

The tyrannical prestige of "classical" Spanish, then, must be ended.

Carlos Fuentes states that Spanish America's language will continue to

be false and anachronistic as long as it is content.to reflect and

justify the present order of things. Spanish American works today must

not be of order, but disorder-or an order different from the presently

accepted one. It must not simply reflect (and thus reinforce) the

current "establishment." Today's literature must deny to the established

order the traditional language which it desires; it must oppose that

order with a new language of alarm, of renovation, of discord, humor

and ambiguity-a language, in sum, which will more closely coincide

with the true state of Spanish American society and open new avenues

of expression for evolving, future societies.'0 Our societies, Fuentes

says, do not want or need more witnesses and critics. They need

writers who will look, listen, imagine and speak-and who will deny

.that we live in the best of all possible worlds."









Fuentes reaffirms an idea which we dealt with in Chapter I-that

Europe has lost its central position in world culture, and that today,

universality no longer means adhering to European models. The Latin

American writer, in his "peripheral" geographical and cultural position,

is just as central to universal culture as any writer anywhere, for,

going back to Octavio Paz's notion, Latin American man is now the

contemporary of all men. Acceptance of this idea leads to the assertion

that to writeabout the people of Peru or Mexico or Argentina with the

language particular to those regions is not to be regionalistic or

restricted in scope. The author who does so is simply focusing on

the universal by means of the particular and the familiar. (Fuentes,

of course, is not referring to costumbrista writings which are limited

in scope, but to novels which deal with universal matters, but with a

more restricted focus.)12

Fuentes sees the writer as the essential link between speech and

language. He bases his ideas on the structuralist view of language,

which places linguistic expression between the opposing poles of structure

(language, fixed into a rigid, grammatical system: synchronic), and

change (speech, the constant process of linguistic development:

diachronic). The point of intersection between these two categories is

the word, and its shaper, the writer. Thus it is the writer who must

fuse the traditional structure of Spanish with the ever-evolving spoken

language to form the new literary language. Herein lies the objective

of today's novelists.'3

Sabato states that all language in the beginning is emotional, con-

crete and concise. It is through use and misuse that language becomes









commonplace or words abstract and devoid of real meaning (e.g.,

"honor," "democracy"). It is the writer's goal to return to words

their original sharpness of meaning, their conciseness, their value

and significance. The way to do this is by coupling words in new and

unheard-of ways (he cites Borges' "infame fama") which creates something

like an electrical voltage between the individual words, mobilizing

their atrophied muscles and giving them a new and unaccustomed

brilliance.1

Returning to his idea that to invent language is to say all the

things that have been suppressed for centuries, Carlos Fuentes states

that not only is there everything still to be said in Spanish America,

but the way to say it is still to be discovered. For immediate reality

in Spanish America today offers the writer many of the same social

scenarios treated long before by realists and naturalists. The problem

is to create a language that will lift such themes above the level of

social protest literature. Hence the contemporary novelists' constant

searching and experimentation. Fuentes states categorically: "...si

no hay una voluntad de lenguaje en una novela en America Latina, para

mf esa novela no existe." Thus, the linguistic plane of the novel

becomes its functional axis; without a renewal of language, the novel

cannot be "new," hence valid, today."s And, at the center of the

linguistic renewal ("linguistic insurrection" is an often-used term

.for the phenomenon) is the word itself. The word is,.in today's world,

power. Fuentes asserts that in its own way'the word is as'powerful

politically, socially, psychologically, as any force on earth-an

updating of the old idea that "the pen is mightier than the sword."









A world leader speaks and the mass media make.his words circle the globe

immediately. Fuentes illustrates by pointing to former United States

Senator Joseph McCarthy, who paralyzed an entire nation with words-pure

words, verbal denunciations and accusations without foundation in fact.

And it is the weight of words which turned public sentiment against

the war in Vietnam and.ultimately brought about the political end of

President Lyndon Johnson. The words of professors, journalists, news

commentators, writers and citizens can alter a nation's course. And

here. we have the core of Fuentes' conception of the Spanish American

novelist's linguistic insurrection.: to fill the void between the total

power of the minority and the total impotence of the majority. Spanish

America needs a permanent, constant, critical restructuring of all

human problems, at all levels of human society, in order to openly deny

the vertical, master-to-slave hierarchy of the existing society. The

word is the key, and the writer today holds that key. He can contribute

to the creation of a more equal, just society; language, not guns or

political power, is the instrument.he.must use. The old language will

not do, for it has helped maintain the entrenched order for centuries.

A new language is needed-one that will question and attack .the status

quo and show constant disrespect (desacato) for it. Language must be

liberty, dissent, reproach, disrespect, or else it will be an accomplice to

the old order. The problem of language boils down to a constant con-

frontation, a permanent dialectic, between the false, lying words and

aspirations of remote, impersonal governments, and the authentic words

and aspirations of the artist and his public. The artist's role is

to make certain that the latter prevails."6





47


Julio.Cortdzar, through his artistic alter-ego in Rayuela, the

fictitious Italian writer-critic Morelli, goes even farther than Fuentes.

Oliveira, the male protagonist of Rayuela, says that the one thing

certain in.all of Morelli's writings is that if we continue to use

language as we have until now, we shall all die without ever having

even known the true name of the day. Life is sold to us prepackaged,

pr.ewrapped in a traditional literary (hence, empty, meaningless) language.
The role of the writer must be to destroylanguage and literature as we

know them, in order to create something better upon the ruins.'7 What -

that something is remains a vague entity.

Although Cortdzar's compatriot Eduardo Mallea does not arrive at the

same destructive conclusion on the subject of language, he does express

dismay over its present state, which he regards as an obstacle or

barrier between man and the expression of his deeper, inner self.

Language, as presently constituted, impedes a full expression of man

and the human condition. Mallea does not know what the solution to the

problem will be, but he is determined to keep searching for a. way to

break down the barriers.18

Expanding on the fictional Morelli's exhortation to destroy language

and literature as we now know them, as well as the too-intellectualized

reason which is an integral part of both, Cortdzar says that we should

not regard him as too much of a terrorist or anarchist. Morelli's

purpose is not to completely raze Western civilization. What he wishes

to do when he advocates dynamiting our present language, literature and

reason, is to provoke a halt, a reassessment, a self-criticism of our

society-to look at the reasons why we have come to what seems to many









people (exemplified in Rayuela's Oliveira) to be a cul-de-sac, a

civilization that is bankrupt, a labyrinth with no exit. This is the

philosophical point of view presented in Rayuela, and Cortazar, like

Fuentes, regards our present language as being one which conforms to

and expresses the status quo, one which lulls us easily into self-con-

tentment and smugness. Before we can become aware of our situation, we

must have a technical instrument-a new language-capable of expressing

something different, something beyond that which we already know and

accept unquestioningly. Our civilization will be able to truly appraise

itself and move in new and diverse directions only when language points

the way by suggesting a new order, a new direction. And language will

be capable of doing this only when the artisans who mold language

(writers) dynamite the existing structures of language and reshape it

to meet their needs."

Cortazar seeks not only to disrupt language but also to destroy the

reader's traditional taboos. For example, in Rayuela, he attacks the

sacrosanct principle that one must always read a book starting at

Chapter I, then preceding to Chapter II, and so forth to the end of the

book. For that reason, he puts his famous Table of Directions at the

beginning of Rayuela, advising the reader that he may choose between read-

ing the novel in the traditional way,, or else read it according to a

preplanned hopscotch method, jumping around in the book until all the

chapters have been read. The idea is to break down the traditional

structures that stifle our society-to suggest to the reader new, un-

thought-of possibilities and-directions that a novel might take. The

deliberate breakdown and restructuring.of language is aimed-at the









same goal: until we make a profound critical analysis and restructuring

of the language of literature, we will not be able to achieve a truly

profound metaphysical criticism of human nature and the human condition.
The two things must go hand in hand, simultaneously, for one is not

possible without the other. And Cortazar indicates that this much-

desired linguistic restructuring is not the.work of grammarians nor

philologists, for their task is simply to institutionalize changes

after they have occurred. The task must fall to the writer-the creator,

who makes the necessary changes occur.20 Certainly, Cortdzar's Rayuela

is on the cutting edge of the linguistic insurrection. Cort6zar tells

how an Argentine critic once stated categorically that Cortazar's first

works were better written than the later ones. From the critic's point

of view, he was right, but from Cortazar's point of view, he was not.

The earlier works dealt with fanciful, fantastic subjects and the

language he used reflected that literary vein. In his later works, his

vision turned inward and he began to search for answers or at least

new paths toward answers to the great questions of man's existence, and

he found that the earlier, more refined, more "literary" style did not

suit his needs, so he destroyed it. This violent act is what upset the

critic, who did not understand the correlation between the change in

language and the about-face in subject. Once again, Cortazar's act is

the result of his belief that the profound revolution in contemporary

society which is so necessary will never take place unless there is an

accompanying revolution in the language used to give voice to that.

society.21





50


The linguistic insurrection or revolution, Fuentes declares (he

also refers to it as the resurrection of a lost language), requires a

wide-ranging diversity of verbal explorations on the part of the novelist.

As in all revolutions, the road ahead is uncharted and the future is

uncertain. The many directions that linguistic exploration is taking

nowadays-exemplified in CortSzar's Rayuela.and Jos6 Lezama Lima's

Paradise, as well as many, many more-is the surest sign of the contemporary

novel's vitality, originality, and its promise of continuing success in

the future. For today's novelists are attacking frontally the previously

sacred rhetoric of literary expression, and Fuentes quotes Baudelaire

who said that sacred books never laugh. Notably, laughter, humor, is

one of the marks of the new novel (see Chapter VI). This is further proof

that the novel today is indeed forging new paths and directions in a

language that had remained too long intact and unchallenged.22

The developers of this "new" language, incidentally, are quite

aware of the paradox inherent in what they are doing-they are, in effect,

biting the hand that feeds them. Their attack on language is an attack

on their own instrument. Although they attack words, they continue to

use them, and to create literature with them. The resolution lies in

the fact that the declaration of war on language is not one of a fight

to the death. The objective is principally to make language more

elastic, more mafleable, and hence,.more responsive to contemporary

needs. The attack, more than on language in general, is on the artificial,

"sanctified" structures into which language has been molded (or forced)

over the years. It is also important tonote that the linguistic

revolution is. not restricted to the novel-it is occurring in all









the genres. It stands out more in the novel, however, because it is

more recent compared with verse and because the novel has been more

conservative and traditional up to now.


Forerunners of the Linguistic Insurrection

A complete investigation into those writers in Spanish America who

have contributed to the renovation of Spanish literary expression would

be a full-length, independent study. Within the scope of-our study we

can only sketch the outlines of this process. There are three pre-

decessors, however, who are frequently mentioned and therefore deserve

at least a passing recognition: Jorge Luis Borges and the literary

movement known as surrealism (exemplified by Miguel Angel Asturias and

Julio Cortizar).'

Turning first to surrealism, this French-inspired movement attracted

many Spanish American writers, and linguistic experimentation became an

integral part of its literature. Asturias, discussing the movement in

general, says that there was undoubtedly something very psychologically

elementary about surrealism-it allowed the writer (through the technique

of "automatic writing") to release the sources of his inner being in a

way which conventional writing never did. Asturias was particularly

struck by the surrealistic quality of some of the Indian texts of his

homeland, like the Popol Vuh and the Anales de los Xahil, which possess.

the kind of duality, or inseparability, between reality and dreams or

fantasies which surrealism advocated. In these Mayan texts, the

dreams (or unreality), told in all their detail, seem more real than

reality itself. And herein lie the beginnings of today's "magic









realism"-an important aspect of the new novel (see Chapter IV). In

magic realism (and in its predecessor, surrealism), there are no

definable boundaries between reality and dreams, between reality and

fiction, between what is seen or experienced and what is imagined.

The surrealist experimentation of combining words at random to create

strange, disconcerting modes of expression enriched the language of

later writers (especially Asturias) by means of euphony and onomatopoeia,

and helped to create the magical, dream-like atmosphere of unreality which

the surrealists were striving to achieve.23

The second, and probably the most important forerunner of today's

experimenters.with language is Jorge Luis Borges. In his far-reaching,

philosophical, often disconcerting short stories, this Argentine writer
is the first to bring the Spanish language face to face with its short-

comings. Fuentes praises Borges' prose as being the first to shake its

reader, to throw him off balance, to hurl him outside himself into the

world, thus giving him some sense of his relation with his nation, his

continent and his universe. This does not diminish, but rather con-

stitutes (constituye)-gives substance and relativity to-Latin American

man.. In order to achieve this new language, Borges mixes genres, turns

to old traditions, destroys tired literary habits, and thus creates

a new structure into which he injects irony, humor and games. The

result is a profound revolution that equates freedom with imagination,

giving the artist free rein over subject matter and form. Fuentes.

affirms that the giant step Spanish American literature has taken from

the protest novel to a critical synthesis of society and a literature

.of imagination would not have been possible without Borges.









Lisa Block de Behar points to the principal elements by which

Borges began to revolutionize Spanish prose.25 He attacked what might

have been presumed to be the strongest point-the prestigious richness

of the Spanish vocabulary. Spanish has traditionally prided itself on

its abundance of synonyms, which prevent dull repetition of a single

word. But Borges attacks this aspect of Spanish, saying that the variety

of synonyms does not produce nuances of meaning and therefore serves

no purpose other than being aesthetically pleasing to the ear. Lisa

Block quotes Borges26 as saying that these synonyms are useless words

which "...sin la incomodidad de cambiar de idea, cambian de ruido...."

Abundance without diversity, then, is not opulence but only waste-a

false baroque style-for these words are useless in distinguishing

between fine shades of meaning. Borges also rejects the use of words

which have been traditionally used for their historical-literary

prestige; instead, he illuminates the most trivial, everyday words

with new light by juxtaposing them with others in startling config-

urations. (Borges for example is a recognized master of the use of

the oxymoron.) He seems to have a particular sensibility for combining

words in new and disconcerting ways, which draw the reader's attention

to the words themselves,'thus forcing the reader to focus his attention

on the intrinsic meaning of the word. His reader, if perceptive,

reacts, is shocked out of his passivity, is forced into a more active

role. Lisa Block cites examples from the story titles in Borges' La

historic universal de la infamia: "El espantoso redentor Lazarus Morell,"

"El proveedor de iniquidades Monk Eastman," "El asesino desinteresado

Bill Harrigan," "El enemigo generoso." These titles show Borges'









tactic of bringing together concepts which are at least unfamiliar

companions, and at times are even antithetical. Borges' "ecumenical"

vision causes not only initial surprise due to these unusual juxta-

positions, but also humor. Through these unexpected juxtapositions,

which no doubt have their roots in the Renaissance conceit, Borges

achieves the classical artistic synthesis of unity in variety. By

doing so, he draws the reader into an active role in the reading of

the story-the reader is induced to share the author's subjective

viewpoint of the particular subject that he is portraying. This is a

first step toward the contemporary novelists' desire,to make the

reader an active part of the literary creation, which we will discuss

at greater length later. While Borges has never written a novel himself,

today's novelists readily recognize their debt to his innovative prose.


Characteristics of the New Language27

Lisa Block discerns five principal fronts on which the contemporary

novelists are waging war on the traditional structures of language: (1) a

mixing of oral, "popular," literature with what would be considered in

traditional circles as "serious" or "important" literature; (2) a sudden

surge in the humorous, particularly the .ironic brand of humor in the

novels; (3) a determined effort on the part of the author to get the reader

involved; (4) a notable irreverence or disrespect for the traditional

literary conventions; and (5) a frontal attack on old verbal cliches.

Let us examine each of these categories in order to see how they result

in a breakdown of the old linguistic structures.









(1) In the traditional novel, language was a traditional instru-

ment restricted by established norms. Today's novelists, although they

sometimes still use this "serious" language, mix it with popular speech

patterns which can be heard, not at meetings of the Royal Spanish

Academy, but on the streets and in the countryside. Such language

was infrequent formerly, with the notable exception of the nativista,

costumbrista author, who often included popular speech patterns in his

novels in an effort to help define in the novel his home region or

country. But the nativista author almost always chose an exceptional,

dialectical variation, of Spanish, peculiar to a particular region--one

thinks immediately of the Argentine gaucho literature or of the

phonetically written passages of Indian speech in Jorge Icaza's

Huasipungo. In both cases, the language, phonetically spelled out, is

uniquely characteristic of the region portrayed as well as the social

class of the speakers. The aim of the current novelist is not at all

the same--in fact, it is just the opposite. Today's novelist, in using

popular, colloquial speech, is not attempting to "define" the character

of any particular region. Instead, he is attempting to desanctify the

heretofore sacrosanct language of Spanish American literature, to write

a contemporary novel in contemporary language, and thus make it more

accessible to today's readers. While a few local words may crop up

here and there'(Argentine lunfardo in.Rayuela, Peruvian slang in La

ciudad y los perros), they do not in any way block the reader's under-

standing of the language as a whole. This is because the popular

language that the writer is employing is generally everyday conver-

sational language-the spontaneous, living language people speak when









they are not consciously aware of "speaking correctly." This is a

language understandable across regional and national borders. It is

sometimes mixed with the more formal, "literary" language to provide

contrast and make the reader aware of the transition (this occurs in

Rayuela), and other times the author uses this conversational style

exclusively. An example of the latter would be Juan Rulfo's Pedro

Paramo, in which the voices of the people of rural Mexico set the

style for the language used. It is a spoken, conversational language,

devoid of rhetorical pretense. Rulfo says of it: "...it isn't a

calculated language. I don't go .out with a tape recorder to take

down what people say and then try to reproduce it afterwards. There's

none of that here. That's simply the way I've heard people speak since

I was born. That's the way people speak in those places."28 Ih other

words, he is attempting simply to write as people speak-openly, freely,

and without "literary" complications.

The use of oral, spoken language also serves the purpose of

deflating the literary forms which it generally accompanies. For

example, Lisa Block cites phrases such as "se lo juro," "usted me

entiende," and "la seiora qu-te dije," which appear frequently within

a more "serious" or "literary" context in Julio Cortazar's La vuelta

al dfa en ochenta mundos.29 They serve to desanctify and contaminate

the literary language toward which Cortdzar feels such a revulsion.

Oral literature is another form of today's linguistic innovation,

and Guillermo Cabrera Infante is one of its chief practitioners. He

describes his novel Tres tristes tigres as a "gallery of voices," and

says that in his book, narrative in the traditional sense is not





57


important. There are two or three basic stories in the novel which are

repeated and altered by the various voices which narrate.3" Cabrera

Infante declares that his book operates on a totally personal level

insofar as the plot is concerned, but that its real base is the spoken

word, not the action or the characters. He states: "...mi primera

preocupaci6n...fue y ha sido siempre la de tratar, ver la manera .de

conseguir, llevar al piano literario el lenguaje que hablan todos

los. cubanos... Es decir, llevar este lenguaje.si td quieres horizontal,

absolutamente hablado, a un plano vertical, a un plano artfstico, a un

piano literario. Es decir, pasar de ser un lenguaje simplemente

hablado a un lenguaje escrito....' Precisamente de lo que se trataba

era de escribir lo no escrito..."31 Here then is Cabrera's definition

of oral literature. In such a scheme, plot and characterization are

naturally relegated to secondary importance. The idea of the novel as

a gallery of voices is the central concern. He emphasizes, however, that

the language he wishes to transpose to the page is "...not the living

language of the Cubans, either in their Platonic or Marxian senses-

only the essentials of their language projected to what for me was at

the time the highest literary potential."32 That is, he does not go

out with a tape recorder and transcribe exactly what he hears. The

voices in Tres tristes tigres are voices which have been strained

through the author's esthetic consciousness and molded to suit his

needs. Cabrera says:

I knew that the lives and the language depicted [in
Tres tristes tigres]..., those talkative specimens and
tner spoken ha itat, were condemned to disappear into.
silence, not in the course of time...but rather to be
abolished by history-that is to say, condemned to.





58


vanish by the revolution through'an immediate catastrophe by
decree: a loquacious people reduced to laconism.... .Thus
and by a quirk of history, [Tres tristes tigres] ended by
becoming a gallery of voices, almost a museum of Cuban
speech in which generations to come will be able to listen
to their ancestors, their old artificers, talking.33

Out of this "oral" writing naturally flows the rampant verbal humor

which characterizes the book. Cabrera Infante is the recognized

Spanish-language master of the pun. He takes two or more toots of

a single word to form a cluster of meanings, leading not only to a

humorous reader reaction but also to a basic cleansing of the words

themselves.34 Cabrera Infante's natural penchant for this game of

"verbal tennis" is evident in the following, in which he discusses (in

English) the process of translating Tres tristes tigres: "We...went

into collective bouts and fits of paronoidmassia, created Spannish,

Spunish, spanning spoonerisms where there were none originally, enhanced

its joyceful playfulness with new analgrams, other palindramas, different

across-sticks, and broadenedits linguistic scope...."3

Cabrera Infante, although he is perhaps the chief proponent of

oral literature, is certainly not the only one. Many Spanish American

novelists turn to the spoken word to a greater or lesser degree in their

works. Even Miguel Angel Asturias, considered today to be an originator

of the "new novel" but not one of-its chief contemporary innovators,

says that the oral aspect of language has aided .him. His famous novel

El senior president was spoken before it was written, he claims. He

and a group of friends used to get together to share stories orally about

dictators under whose regimes they had lived, and that is how the book

began to take shape in his mind. He says he could recite entire chapters


I









by'heart before he ever wrote them down.36 So the oral aspect of

writing is certainly not new.

(2) Humor has been introduced into the contemporary Spanish American

novel'simultaneously with the use of oral language. This is a startling

departure from the traditional novel, which took itself completely

seriously, allowing no place for laughter. Not only was the language

of the traditional novel sacred, but so was its theme and tone. The

two phenomena of oral language and humor go easily together,,for humor-

particularly that type of humor based upon plays on words-is clearly

tied to a supple,pliable language which can be manipulated for amusing

or ironic effects.37

(3) One of the primary objectives of the contemporary Spanish

American novelist is to involve the reader actively in the creation of

the novel as well as the reading of it. The novelists' use of such

tactics as oral language and humor, as well as many others, is aimed

(at least partially) at attracting the reader's attention and drawing

him out of his traditional, passive role as mere absorber of the novel.

Julio Cortdzar is one of the principal proponents of what he refers to as-

the "accomplice reader," and we shall examine his and other novelists'

theories in detail in Chapter III.

(4) The contemporary .novel is marked by an aggressive irreverence

or disrespect for established literary and linguistic conventions.

Specifically, the author shatters traditional syntax, the traditionally

"literary" vocabulary, correct spelling, the phonetics of words and

phrases. The author's purpose in breaking all the accepted rules is

to render the Spanish language more elastic, more malleable, more









ductile and flexible, so that it can be reshaped to meet the overall

needs of contemporary society and the novelist's own personal needs.

Carlos Fuentes points to Vargas Llosa's La casa verde as a first

example of this phenomenon of the destruction of literary and linguistic

sacred cows.38 .In La casa verde, verb tenses and subject pronouns are

confused. The past is narrated in the present tense and the present in

the past tense. .In Fuentes' structuralist view of language, Vargas

Llosa turns structured language (lengua) into the live, constantly

changing process of speech (habla), as in the following oral conver-

sation, taken from Vargas Llosa's.book: "T6 pasaron cerca y en

caballos chicaros, que tales locos, van hasta el rfo, ahora regresan,

no tengas miedo chiquito, y ahT.su rostro girando, interrogando, su

ansiedad, el temblor de su boca, sus uhas como clavos y sus manos por

qua, c6mo y su respiraci6n junto a la tuya. Ahora calmala, tO yo te

explico, Tohita, ya se fueron, iban tan rdpido, no les vf las caras y

ella tenaz, sedienta, averiguando en la negrura, quidn, por qu6, c6mo."

The effect is to throw the reader into the midst of the conversation,

dizzily trying to follow the changes of speakers, with only an

occasional "tu" or change in verb tense or person to indicate a

change in speaker. Vargas Llosa has completely done without the

traditionally structured and acceptable-way to present dialogue, with

each speaker's.name clearly indicating his share of the conversation.

Fuentes points to Alejo Carpentier for a second example.39 Carpentier

substitutes the hallowed convention of characters and plot as the central

structures of the novel with a fusion in which characters and plot,

rather than occupying center stage, become instead resistances









(resistencias) to a total language which develops in all directions of

lo. real-that which is real (as opposed to la realidad-reality--which

may be deceptive and, in the end, false). Fuentes compares the change

using Carpentier's favorite comparative art: music. He states that

just as contemporary music has abandoned its horizontal-vertical

structure of melody and harmony to become total sound, so the novel

today asserts its right to be total writing, total language, with this

total language flowing over, touching and colliding with the multiple

planes of lo real. We suspect that Fuentes had Carpentier's El acoso

in mind when he wrote this. A further illustration may be found in La

casa verde; in this novel, plot .and. characters certainly assume a rather

secondary position vis-a-vis the principal elements of time, space and

language, all of which are multiple planes representing Vargas Llosa's

Peru.

Yet another example to be found in Carpentier is the throwing away

of the false illusion of recreating la'realidad. 0 In the traditional

novel, such as Doia Barbara, language represents directly, it. reproduces
"reality": the Venezuelan plains and Santos Luzardo are nothing more

nor less than their intended "mirrored" image. In the contemporary novel,

on the other hand, there is an awareness-of the artifice of creation.

Fuentes notes by way of example that Carpentier's short story "Viaje

a la semilla" is merely a representation of a former representation.

That is, the story is a recreation (through the backward movement of

time) of a former recreation (the literary recounting of the man's life)

of an aspect of reality (the man's life itself). The literary recreation

(the story) knows that it has no existence outside of literature. This









awareness of its own artifice is one of the strengths of the modern

narrative, Fuentes believes, because it forces the reader to take

stock of the situation and separate reality from fiction. The reader

can no longer passively read and obligingly accept the printed page

as a straightforward presentation of reality. He is forced to

think, thereby joining the process of literary creation.

Cortdzar speaks of "unwriting" (desescribir) rather than "writing"

novels-meaning the invention of a counter-language, not to replace the

present word images'and figures, but to go beyond them." Where such a

process will lead, Cortazar himself does not know. He only hopes it

will create something better, something capable of expressing the

profundities and vagaries of human experience. At any rate, his attack

on the root of language-the word-stems from his desire to "unwrite"

a novel. His attitude toward words, states Fuentes, is the same as

Octavio Paz's, who says: "Atrdpalas, c6gelas del rabo, chillen, putas"-

the individual word is a "whore," selling itself to any user, with no

deep meaning, betraying those who entrust it with meaning. Fuentes

concludes by saying that the author must "pour" (verter) the word if

he is to achieve a meaningful expression through words. By "pouring,"

he means reshaping, remolding to meet his needs. For only a reshaped

("poured") word or language will be able to deny the false reality that

a false language has given us for so long, and substitute in its place

a view of the totality of lo real.42

(5) The fifth and final area of attack against language in Lisa

Block's analysis is the willful destruction of all those forms of

"prefabricated" or "ready-made"' expression which are a sign of laziness





63


or lack of inventiveness on the part of the writer: set phrases,

cl.iches, trite or pedantic expressions. Words and phrases, as we

said earlier in this chapter, begin with a clear, concise meaning.

It is through repeated usage that they gain layers of extra meanings,

or nuances of the original one. Through repeated use, words coalesce

into set patterns, and after a while, the euphony of the phrase

obliterates its meaning for the hearer or reader-it is used because

it "sounds right." The original significance.of the word or phrase

is dulled or even lost. The attack on the cliche is an attempt to

recharge the word or phrase-with its original clarity and concision.

Asturias is a case in point. He sees the foundation of the language

revolution as being centered around plays on words, onomatopoeia,

parallelism (the repetition of a single concept through the use of

different words-a practice inherited from the Mayan Indians), the

multiplication of syllables and the use of augmentatives,alliterations,

verbal refrains, and the mating or juxtaposition of words that, as

the Mayan Indians say, have never met before (Asturias points out that

the Indians say that poetry is where words meet for the first time).43

All of these methods or instruments serve the purpose of drawing the

reader's attention.to the individual word, forcing him to evaluate

its content and meaning. These techniques do not allow preformed

phrases to stand, but are instrumental in expressing in.a novel:way

what may or may not already be familiar. What is important is that

the words not betray the writer simply because they are worn out and

meaningless due to overuse.








The Baroque Tendency Versus Simple, Straightforward
Language; "Beauty" in Language

Lisa Block de Behar notes that traditional literary language has

been venerated and revered for so long that it practically stands apart

from present-day spoken language as a separate system, one which needs

to be "learned" by the beginning writer. This dichotomy between literary

and spoken language traces its origins all the way back to the Spanish

Golden Age, in which the dichotomy between lo culto and lo popular-

the "educated" versus-the "popular" in literature-was a major issue.

It seems to us that there are two clearly identifiable trends in the

contemporary Spanish American novel which strive to eliminate this

distinction between "literary" and "non-literary" language-a "baroque"

trend and a simpler, straightforward style. Superficially, these may

appear to reincarnate the Golden Age dichotomy between baroque and

classical, but in reality, they are both meaningful, though divergent

means to a single end-the destruction of the old-style, "literary,"

cliche-ridden language. Language which is false or artificial, the

so-called "pure literature," is the target of both tendencies. Let us

examine each of these trends in further detail, beginning with the

tendency toward the baroque.

The Colombian critic and short story writer Oscar Collazos defines

"baroque" (in terms of today's Spanish American novel) as meaning two

things: (1) it refers to scenography-a way of portraying geography

or the.utilization of a language which seeks to exhaust itself through

the word, through verbal reiteration or in interminable descriptive

phrases, in instrumental erudition (erudici6n instrumental); and (2) it









also refers to the intent to ,carry the verbal recreation of reality to

its furthest consequences. Collazos cites four illustrative examples

of "baroque" novels in Spanish America: Carpentier's El siglo de las

luces, GarcTa M6rquez's Cien anos de soledad, Juan Marechal's AdAn

Buenosayres, and Lezama Lima's Paradiso. "

Alejo Carpentier is the foremost proponent of the baroque as the

language most apt for the Spanish American novel, and his novels reflect

his beliefs. He states very simply: "El legftimo estilo del novelist

latinoamericano actual es el barroco." He bases his theory of the baroque

on the fact that, as he states,45 Spanish American art in all forms has

always been baroque: beginning with pre-Columbian sculpture and pottery

(example: the twisting, contorted Peruvian huacos depicting physical

love, combat and other forms of violent movement and emotion) and highly

decorated codices; to the elaborate (sometimes tortuously so) cathedrals

and monasteries of the Colonial period. Our art today, says Carpentier,

tends naturally toward thebaroque because it is historically "our

style," and responds best to the Spanish American novelist's need_ to

name things. The novelist must "name" all that which defines and surrounds

him in this strange and unfamiliar new world-the "contexts" which we

introduced in Chapter I-in order to place himself on a universal plane.

Carpentier.totally rejects, of course, the approach of the nativista

novel of "naming" (with an appendix to explain exotic vocabulary). His

method is to define through an accumulation of adjectives and qualifiers

of precise, delimiting meaning, painting a verbal picture, but always

remaining on a universal plane. In this way, he believes, the Spanish

American world will be comprehensible to everyone, and not regional

or inward-looking. Even that which is strange and exotic to outside









eyes and mirdswill take on a.semblance of veracity and credibility.

Through the lush, luxuriant, yet concise baroque language, the Spanish

American author can expand his literary horizons, opening up ever

greater areas for exploration. (Carpentier contrasts the baroque con-

cept with the contemporary French nouveau roman, which, he says, is a

constricting movement, an attempt to narrow the novelist's focus

rather than widen .it.)46

The master of the baroque is Lezama Lima, who defines his "poetic

system of the world" as follows: "El sistema podtico no pretend tener
ni aplicaci6n ni inmediatez. No aclara, no oscurece, no se derivan

de l6 obras, no hace novelas, no hace poeslas; Es, estS, respira....

Lo que pretend es un henchimiento, una dilataci6n de la imagen hasta

la lrnea del horizonte."47 Lezama uses a highly baroque language,

accumulating images and metaphors in an overwhelming flow of words-to

portray his poetic system, seeking to open the novel's view to the

widest possible vision of mankind. The idea is that through total

language, one can perhaps achieve a total novel.

Julio Cortazar warns against the use of language for language's

sake'alone, however."8 He cites examples-Gabriel Mir6 and many of

the novels of Camilo Jos6 Cela--of authors whose works go no farther

than language, with nothing beneath. Language in them becomes an end

rather than a means to an end. Cortazar calls this type of writing

"verbal masturbation," or, as Borges preferred to call it, a way of

"mixing up the dictionary." For Cortazar, a highly worked, polished

language should serve the purpose of conveying to the reader a system

(not a "message") such as his own philosophical system (Rayuela) or









Lezama Lima's poetic system (Paradiso). Language for Cortazar should

open windows on reality, it should aid in the metaphysical search which

is Cortazar's central concern. Although CortAzar does not speak in terms

of "baroque" and his own writings hardly fit the definition of the term,

his attitude is favorable with regard to the baroque as understood and

used by Carpentier.

Certainly not all of today's Spanish American novelists agree with

Carpentier, however, Mexico's Juan Rulfo stands at the opposite end of

the spectrum, as an advocate of a very simple and straightforward, un-

complicated narrative style. Rulfo uses a language as-lean and spare

as Carpentier's is rich and luxuriant. For Rulfo, simplicity is the soul

of language, and he consciously avoids the baroque tendency of many of

his contemporaries: "I try to defend myself against the baroque, and

I'll continue to do so, with all the means at my disposal."49 So

bare-boned is Rulfo's language that Lisa Block refers to his writing

as linguistic "asceticism."50 His economy of language, she states, seeks

to return to the primary function of the word-to use it as an instrument

of expression and not as an instrument of adornment. Through linguistic

synthesis, Rulfo regains for language its function of communication.

This stark language, stripped of adornment, is uniquely appropriate for

his description of the dusty villages of Jalisco and their reticent

inhabitants. .One wonders if Rulfo was conscious of the parallel

between stark language, stark landscape and a taciturn people, or if

it simply came naturally to a man who is taciturn himself and is a

native of the region he depicts. One may suspect that rather than

being a carefully orchestrated theoretical, approach to writing, Rulfo's





68



style is simply a form of expression best suited to his own temperament.

As we noted above, he aims to write in an oral, conversational style

which is simple and direct: "I don't want to speak as you write, but

to write as you speak."5'

Ernesto Sabato shares Rulfo's dislike of literary language. He

says52 that for centuries, writers and readers have abided by a dual

standard of language, with the simple, straightforward language of

daily conversation being used in daily life, and a.special, high-flown

language being set aside for use in literature'.. He calls this latter

a "Sunday language" (lenguaje dominguero). The everyday variety was

fine for person-to-person contact but the "Sunday-best" variety was

always trotted out when it was a question of creating art. Sdbato

notes that this tendency still persists in many journalists and some

authors in Spanish America, who think it more refined to write equino

where caballo would be adequate. They do not seem to realize that

poetry is not created with poetic words but rather with poetic deeds or

facts (hechos), expressed in a simple and direct way. The mark of a good

writer, says Sabato, is that "...un buen escritor expresa grandes cosas

con pequenas palabras; a la inversa del mal escritor, que dice cosas

insignificantes con grandes palabras."53 Sabato backs up his position

quoting the French philosopher-writer Pascal who commented on writers to

whom (for example) "capital of the kingdom" sounded more refined, more

elegant or more "literary" than "Paris": "Cuando uno se encuentra con

un estilo natural, se queda asombrado y encantado: porque esperaba

hallarse.con un autor y se encuentra con un hombre."5s


:, 1









SAbato insists, however, that the idea of a natural style in.

language does not denote an easy or spontaneous style. Quite the con-

trary, a "spontaneous" style would nearly always sound ragged and thrown-

together. In order to make a piece of prose sound natural, it is

generally necessary for the writer'to work and rework his material,

paring away what is unnecessary until the expression sounds easy and

fluid. Perhaps the fact that Sabato has only produced three novels of

note to date bears him out on this subject. We suspect that Juan Rulfo,

who has written only one novel and one collection of short stories,

would agree. Sdbato sums up his position: "Es que los grandes

creadores no son grandes por esa mera acumulaci6n de vocablos sino por

el poder revelador y expresivo que logran de los vo'cablos archiconocidos.

Como en el ajedrez, una palabra no vale por si sola sino por su posici6n,

por la estructura total de que forma part. S61o un escritor mediocre

puede desdeiar ciertas palabras, como un mal jugador desdeBa un pe6n:

ignora que muchas veces sostiene una posici6n."55

On the question of beauty in language, Sabato states categorically

that today's literature does not propose beauty as its objective, If

beauty is achieved incidentally, that is another matter, and is worthy

of praise. But he insists that the purpose of literature is to delve

into the meaning of man's existence, to get to the bottom of the great

mysteries of life and death. No word must be uttered in vain, and if it

is (Sabato gives as an example some passages in James Joyce), it con-

stitutes a serious defect in the literary work.56 Sabato goes on to say

that neither Shakespeare nor Dante was consciously aiming for beauty of

expression, but that their goal was the metaphysical exploration of man's









existence which Sabato also advocates.57 If they ultimately.achieved

beauty in their works, he says, it is not.that "mere" beauty which one

achieves by seeking it consciously, but rather a great and tragic

beauty which arises naturally out of the depths of man's being.58

Gabriel GarcTa MArquez agrees. He tells his stories as the common

people do-unfalteringly, mixing reality with fiction, but with a firm

conviction that it is all true (see Chapter II!'s section on "style").

He states that "the problem of literature is words." His short novel

El coronel no tiene quien le'escriba was written nine times. .Garcfa

Mtrquez ironically comments that it seemed he was writing the novel in

French rather than in Spanish, a reference to the purity, the concise-

ness and the simplicity of the language.5s

In answer to an interviewer's question concerning whether or not'

literature can create an autonomous language of its own, Guillermo Cabrera

Infante replies that such would be impossible without falling into the

esthetic errors of writing belles lettres and into an excessive pre-

occupation with style, with "fine Writing," worrying over le mot juste-

becoming entangled in the old-style "Sunday" language, in fact-and that,.

he states, would be "the most idiotic of pursuits.""6

On this question of beauty in language, the novelist-who has probably

had the most to say is Julio Cortazar. CortAzar's fictitious alter-ego,

the writer-critic Morelli, addresses the subject from the pages of Rayuela.

Morelli tells us6' that he is writing a short story which he wants to

be the least "literary" possible. It is a very difficult task, however,

for "beautiful," "literary" expressions keep popping up naturally, un-

thinkingly. He cites an example: to describe a character walking.down a









staircase, he writes "Ram6n emprendi6 el descenso." He'scratches this

out and replaces it with "Ram6n empez6 a bajar." Then,he stops to ask

himself why he has such an intense dislike for the "literary" language

of "emprendi6 el descenso." It means precisely the same thing as

"empez6 a bajar";'the chief difference is that the latter is prosaic.

(that is, a mere vehicle of information) while the former combines the

useful (information) with the agreeable (it is "elegant," it "sounds

nice"). What repels him in the'literary form, Morelli says, is the use of

a verb and a noun which we almost never use in daily conversation. They.

are there merely for their decorative effect. He fears, however, that

if he persists in this vein, everything he writes will prove to be

boring and uninteresting. But at the same time that it seems to him that

he is writing badly, he sees reason for hope. His former style (which we

may equate, incidentally, with Cort6zar's 'language in his early works,

particularly the fantastic short stories) was merely a mirror for what

he calls "swallow-readers" (lectores-alondra), who found recognition and

solace in such "literary" language. It is much easier, he declares, to

write aesthetically, "beautifully" (the conventional way) than it is to

"unwrite" (desescribir) as he would like to do, in an antiliterary manner.

He sees the whole question as a moral one-to do what is right, and not

what is easiest. The only beauty that is satisfactory, he says, the

only beauty that is artistically valid is created when the artist

fuses his perception of the human condition with that of his own con-

dition as an artist. Morelli concludes: "En cambio el plano meramente

est6tico me parece eso: meramente. No puedo explicarme mejor."62









Morelli's disdain for a "merely" esthetic, "literary" language

is exemplified in Rayuela in an incident involving Oliveira. Cortdzar

recounts it:

...Rayuela, from a stylistic point of view, is very
badly written. There's even a part (chapter 75) where
the language starts to become very elegant. Oliveira
remembers his past life in Buenos Aires, and does so
in a polished and highly chiseled language. It's an
episode that's written fussing over every word, until,
after about half a page, suddenly Oliveira breaks out
laughing. He's really been watching himself all the
time in the mirror. So then he takes his shaving
cream and starts to draw lines and shapes on the
mirror, making fun of himself. I think this scene
fairly well sums up what the book is trying to do.63

Oliveira is obviously making fun of what Cortazar.describes as an

author's clearing his throat, fanning out his tail feathers, and re-

producing on a slightly higher level what a semiliterate man does when

he sits down to write a letter and finds it necessary to use a completely

different language from the one he ordinarily speaks. Cortdzar affirms

that literature abounds with "well-written" works which say nothing

at all if one looks closely. Any attempt to separate.form and content

(another of the traditional literary myths) is erroneous, for the one

must adjust to the requirements of the other. A writer may have a very

florid, highly developed style, but have nothing to say. Or he may have

much to say but lack the necessary linguistic skills. In either case,

the writer will be a failure, Cortdzar says, for to be successful, the

writer must achieve the synthesis to which .Morelli referred (above).64

And in his search for a new language, Cortgzar-Morelli is seeking (by

rather different means) to achieve the same end Borges sought (v.s.),

that is, to recapture the pristine conciseness, the sharp-edged precision









of each word: "Lo que Morelli quiere es devolverle al lenguaje sus

derechos. Habla de expurgarlo, castigarlo, cambiar descenderr" por

"bajar" como media higidnica; pero lo que el busca en el fondo es

devolverle al verbo descenderr" todo su brillo, para que pueda ser

usado como yo uso los f6sforos y no como un fragmento decorative, un

pedazo de lugar comdn."65

Experimentation with Language

Without pretending to offer a complete analysis, and relying once

again on the categories used by Lisa Block de Behar in her study, it

would be fair to state that the fundamental thrust in the current "lin-

guistic insurrection" is the breaking up of cliches, and the attendant

surprising and humorous effects obtained as a result. Lisa Block cites

as examples Cortgzar's "la frente surcada de argucias"66 (replacing the

time-worn phrase "la frente surcada de arrugas") and Cabrera Infante's

"...del azuloso mar procelado (zo se dice azulado mar proceloso?),"67

deliberately confusing the endings of two poetic ("literary") words.

The humor and the value of such cliche attacks lies in the fact that

the reader reacts with pleasure and enjoyment, even self-satisfaction,

when he discovers the old cliche6) form and subsequently sees the humor

or irony in the new form. The imbalance between the two (what Lisa

Block calls the desnivel humoristico) results not only in a humorous

twist, but also in an enriched meaning, because not only does-the new

form carry its own (usually humorous) meaning but also, implicitly, the

old, discarded meaning. Thus the figure of speech is enriched and trans-

formed; it operates on two levels of meaning rather than one. Rather than









a desescritura such as Cortgzar suggests, Lisa Block suggests that this

is a sobrescritura, since the original meaning is not destroyed, but only

camouflaged.

A second method of attack, related to the first, is the use of

the double-entendre (la dilogfa)-the word or phrase- with a double

meaning-to create a humorous and disruptive effect on a set phrase,

whose popularly accepted meaning is based on only one of its two

possible meanings. Two examples from Cabrera Infante illustrate this

method: "...yo me metf una servilleta de papel (era una fonda a la

modern) en la boca para ahogar la risa, pero'la risa sabia nadar

crawl...""8; and "Of una cascada de risa, una sola larga carcajada m6s

cubana que argentina."G9 In each of these examples, Cabrera Infante .

attacks the cliche by attacking the key word within it, offering a

second and totally nonsensical meaning for the word in question. In

the first example, he attacks ahogar, suggesting its literal meaning

"to drown" rather than its figurative ("correct") meaning "to stifle"

by saying that his laughter could swim the crawl. In the second example,

he attacks argentina, suggesting its more commonplace meaning ."Argentine"

rather than its more literary ("correct")meaning "silvery" by juxta-

posing it with another adjective of nationality, "cubana." Thus, by

manipulating a second (usually more ordinary, less "literary") meaning

of the key word in a cliche, the author can reduce the cliche to a

shambles, to a linguistic joke, making the reader aware of the words

themselves and the artificiality of their traditional groupings.

Two opposing experiments against established forms in language are

exemplified in Ravuela-the running together of contiguous words in a set









phrase or the breaking up of words into hyphenated syllables: "...mientras

Babs lo miraba admirada y bebiendosuspalabrasdeunsolotrago...",70 and
"...mientras Gekrepten se-re-tor-cf-a-las-ma-nos..."?' Although these

two methods are more or less opposite in technique, they are aimed at

and achieve the same end-the destruction of the cliche employed. In

order to decipher these passages, the reader is forced to slow down, and

most likely to read them aloud to himself. By doing so, the author has

forced the reader to stumble over the familiar-two figures of speech

as common as "bebiendo sus palabras" and "retorcer las manos." By

faltering over these worn-out phrases rather than skimming unthinkingly

over them, the reader is forced to take stock of both the sound and the

meaning of the words, thus "recreating" them for himself.

A further form of attack on the written language is made by altera-

tions in spelling. The writer who changes the spelling of words sees

himself as recreating those words, making them his. He is also making

fun of those words, and of the Spanish system of spelling. These intentional

misspellings tend to occur using those few letters in the Spanish alpha-

bet which can cause confusion in spelling due to their sound'or lack of

sound (such as g and j; k and qu; z, c and s; 11 and y; b and v; and

the silent h). Some examples of deliberate alterations in spelling are

Cabrera infante's "...queremos quomer. -Pero, haziendo burlas, amiguito,

no se come..."72; and Julio Cortgzar's playful silent h: "En esos casos

Oliveira agarraba una hoja de papel y escribla las grandes palabras por

las que iba resbalando su rumia. Escribla por ejemplo: 'El gran hasunto,'

o 'la hencrucijada.' Era suficiente para ponerse a refr y cebar otro

mate con mas ganas. 'La hunidad,' hescribfa Holiveira. 'El hego y el









hotro.' Usaba las haches como otros la penicilina. Despuds volvfa mas

despacio al asunto, se sentfa mejor. 'Lo himportante es no hinflarse,'

se decla Holiveira. A partir de esos moments se sentfa capaz de

pensar sin que las palabras le jugaran sucio."73 Cort6zar supplies one

further example in Chapter 69 of Rayuela, of which the following is an

excerpt: "El desaparesido. krefa en la bida future. Si lo konfirm6,

ke aya en-eya la felisidad ke, aunke kon distintas karakterfsticas,

anelamos todos los umanos."7 .Writers see such "terrorism" against proper

spelling as "demystifying" words-taking away the sacred, untouchable

aura which surrounds them and making them more accessible, more malleable,

more usable. And as Lisa'Block points out, this "trick" also makes fun

of overly literary language as used by semiliterate or relatively un-

educated people, who tend to misspell through overcorrection in an

attempt to write "properly."75

Probably the most spectacular-and the most humorous-of the

deliberate mutations practiced on language by our novelists is the

invention and use of words which do not exist. The author makes up

words and inserts them into a given context, and leaves it up to the

reader to decipher the (supposed) intended meaning. The acknowledged

master of this practice is Julio Cortdzar, and the most famous example

is the lenguaje "glfglico" which Rayuela's characters speak to each other

as a sort of verbal game. One sentence will suffice to illustrate the

game: "Apenas 61 le amalaba el noema, a ella se le agolpaba el cl4miso

y cafan en'hidromurias, en salvajes ambonios, en sustalos exasperantes."'6

It is readily apparent that the subject is a sexual encounter between a

man and a woman. At first glance, the passage seems incomprehensible,


__









but such is not really the case, for Cortazar has tied his exotic

non-words together with real, correct Spanish articles, prepositions,

pronouns and adjectives. ("Apenas l1 le... el..., a ella se le...

el .... y calan en..., en salvajes..., en ... exasperantes.") Through

this linguistic restructuring, the reader's intelligence and fantasy

perceive and comprehend the general sense of the passage. The endings

of this new language link us closely.to Spanish; amalaba and agolpaba

are obviously verbs in the imperfect tense, the remaining new.words are

evidently nouns. So by carefully placing his fanciful words into an

identifiable Spanish grammatical structure, CortAzar creates the

hilarious illusion of a unique, fanciful language, while at the same

time probing the deeper recesses of Spanish's inner structures. This is

exactly what Lewis Carrol did in his famous poem "Jabberwocky.," in

which he made a game out of language while (partially) destroying

and re-forming it.

The idea of language as a game literaturea lIdica) is central to

the linguistic insurrection of today's Spanish American novel as it is

directly tied to the writers' insistence that language should cease to

be a sacred object, fixed forever.in rigid forms. Cabrera Infante is

in the forefront of this movement. He states:

For me, literature is a game, a complicated game, abstract
and concrete at the same time, taking place on a physical
plane-the page-and on the various mental planes of
memory, imagination, and thought. A game not very
different from chess but without the connotation of
science-game which many people.insist on conferring on
chess, as a form of amusement and self-absorption at
the same time. I always write for my own amusement
and if afterwards there are readers who can read what
I write and be amused with me, beside me, I rejoice that
we can share this diversion a posteriori.77









By playing with words, he not only destroys them in their present forms,

but also creates new forms at random, often grotesque, often humorous,

often .both simultaneously: "hacer el amor hacer el amor hacer el amor-

acerelamor aceleramo, acerela, acere..."78; and one of the best-known

examples: "...y me cordd [sic] de Alicia en el Pals de las Maravillas

y se lo dije al Bustroformidable y 61 se puso a recrear, a regular:

Alicia en el mar de villas, Alicia en el Pals que Mas Brilla, Alicia en

el Cine Maravillas, Avaricia en el Pals de las Malavillas, Malavidas,

Mavaricia, Marivia, Malicia, Milicia Milhizia Milhinda Milindia Milinda

Malanda Malasia Malesia Maleza Maldicia Malisa Alisia Alivia.Aluvia

Alluvia Alevilla y marlisa y marbrilla y maldevilla y empez6 a cantar

tomando como pie forzado (fdrzudo)...."79 The object of this verbal

game is to create new words and word groups with new and striking

sounds and rhythms and meanings or suggestions of meanings. But most

of all, it is a game to have fun with-a playtoy in the novelist's (and

the reader's) hand, which, as Lisa Block rightly points out, requires a

return to oral reading, for the full impact of the preceding variations

on'Alice in Wonderland can be appreciated only by reading the entire

passage aloud or.by hearing it read.

Cortgzar's Rayuela is full of language games. We have already seen
the best-known of them, the mirthful glfglico language. Cortazar's

characters also play a language game they call the "cemetery game" (el

juego en el cementerio). The "cemetery" in this game is the Dictionary

of the Royal Spanish Academy of the Language (which represents language

in its most highly formalized, fixed form,, therefore the target of

destructive humor). The game consists of opening the dictionary at









random, and making up a speech or story using as many of the words on that

page as possible. The more rare, exotic or technical words, the better,

for that is the point of the game-to show how useless the dictionary

(the repository of literary language) is. Oliveira gives us an example

of the cemetery game (all of the words he uses really do exist):

"Hartos del client y de sus cleonasmos, le.sacaron el clfbano y el

clipeo y.le hicieron tragar una clica. Luego le aplicaron un clistel

clinico en la cloaca, aunque clocaba por tan clivoso ascenso de agua

mezclada con clinopodio, revolviendo los clisos como cleriz6n clor6tico.'80

Another game Cortizar plays with the reader is in Chapter 34 of Rayuela

in which two stories are told simultaneously. One is told on lines 1,

3, 5, 7, 9, etc.; the other on lines 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, etc. He does not

warn the reader, however, and the reader is left to figure it out for

himself. The reader must also decipher the apocopated words in the

following: "...como lo sabe cualquiera que frecuente tertulias de

espaioles o argentinos despues de la tercera copa / rica Latina buscando

desde hace aios un camino: Lezama Lima, Fuentes, Vargas Llosa, dos o

tres mas apenas, han empezado a abrir picadas a machete limpio / tores

m6s j6venes..."81 These abrupt changes give the impression of the

author's mind as it jumps from one idea to the next. The game consists

of following the train of thought and supplying the missing syllables

to complete the words.

In another form of literature ldica, the Cuban novelist Severo

Sarduy plays a game with his reader which he calls "radial reading." In

this reading, Sarduy writes an entire passage without ever mentioning

the key word. He gives numerous clues from which the reader must guess

the missing key word. Sarduy gives us an example form his novel Cobra:









-S--anadi6 el Facultativo--, los curanderos legendarios'
que fundaron el Sikkim, para combatir el albarazo o
-blanca morfea, un herpes. corrosive, o mas bien una lepra
que atacaba al ganado, inyectaban a las reses un alcaloide
del apio disuelto en agua frfa. En las montabas los pastores
usaban nieve. Poco a poco estos iltimos fueron descubriendo
que los animals, despues de los enemas, al mismo tiempo que
entraban en un sopor sin limits, crecfan milagrosamente,
y que ello, al contrario de todo lo previsto, estaba en
relaci6n direct no con la cantidad del extract, sino con
la del disolvente. Asf se form la raza de los yacks, esos
bdfalos mansos que aGn hoy en dfa recorren las mesetas
del Asia Central, siguiendo a los monjes peregrinos. .El
cambio morfoi6gico que pretendemos puede obtenerse, y ello
sin que Pup abandon los brazos de Morfeo: basta con
inyectarle eh las venas nieve.82

In order to decipher the passage, the reader must discover the missing key

word, which is morfina. Although never mentioned, morfina is suggested

by (1) morfoldgico/morfea (a sickness)/Morfeo; (2) alcaloide del apio

(read: alcaloide del opio); (3) nieve (slang name for the drug), blanca;

and (4) inyectarle en las venas. These are the "radial" clues which

lead to the central word, morfina, and to discover the missing link is

the reader's task.

In conclusion, the language of the novel has risen from being an

accessory, traditional means of expression, to one of central concern to

the novelist. This preoccupation has taken and continues to take

multiple directions, but the desire to reform the literary Spanish

language is so pervasive among today's Spanish American novelists that

it is a unifying nexus. Vargas Llosa concludes that the search for

new linguistic forms of expression in many of today's writers has led

to works which are, more than anything, linguistic experiments, novels

whose heroes are not men, but rather words.83 Cabrera Infante, in response

to the question "What does literary creation mean to you?", answers

simply: "Words, words, words."8' Such'is the overpowering importance of

language in today's Spanish American novel.










NOTES

'Fuentes, La nueva novela hispanoamericana, pp. 30-35.

2Ibid., pp. 93-94.

3Ibid., p. 30.

"Ibid., p. 94.

SS6bato, El escritor y sus fantasmas, p. 32.

6As Sabato points out, this subservience extends all the way to
copying peninsular Spanish mistakes, such as the often-heard "les invitamos
a escuchar" on Spanish American radio and television programs; these
announcers are taking as a sign of refinement and elegance what is really
no more than a peninsular confusion between the dative pronoun les and
the accusative los.

7Sabato, El escritor y sus fantasmas, p. 216.

8Ibid., pp. 219-220.

91bid., pp. 220-221.

"'Fuentes, La nueva novela hispanoamericana, pp. 31-32.

"Ibid., pp. 94-95.

12Ibid., p. 32.

"Ibid., pp. 32-33

'"Sbato, El escritor y sus fantasmas, p. 243.

"SFuentes, "Situaci6h del escritor en Amdrica Latina," p. 17.

"I6bid., pp. 20-21.

1Julio Cortdzar, Rayuela, 11th ed. (Buenos Aires: Sudamericana, 1969),
p. 503.

"Carmen Rivelli, "Entrevista'a Eduardo Mallea en Buenos Aires,"
Hispania, March 1971, pp. 193-194.

"Gonzalez Bermejo, Cosas de escritores, p. 99.

20Margarita Garcfa Flores, "Siete respuestas de Julio Cortdzar,"
Revista de la Universidad de Mexico, March 1967, p. 11.









21Ibid.,


22Fuentes, La nueva novel hispanoamericana, p. 30.

23Guibert, Seven Voices, p. 136.

24Fuentes, La nueva novela hispanoamericana, pp. 24-26.

2sLisa Block de Behar, Anl1isis de un lenguaje en crisis (Montevideo:
Nuestra Tierra, 1969), pp. 35-53.

"In Borges: El lenguaje de Buenos Aires (Buenos Aires: Emecd, 1965).

21In this section and the remaining sections of this chapter, we shall
be following the general outlines of the previously mentioned study of
language in today's Spanish American novel, Lisa Block de Behar's Anglisis
de un lenguaje en crisis. Lisa Block's book is an excellent approach to
the subject of language. It is well-planned, logical.in development and
well-illustrated with examples from contemporary novels. Therefore, we
wish at this point to acknowledge our indebtedness to this book. We shall
be following the characteristics that Lisa Block lists as representative,
and reinforce her categories with material we have drawn directly from
our authors.

28Harss, Into the Mainstream, p. 271.

29Block, op. cit., pp. 89-91.

"3Guibert, op. cit., p. 410.

"Guillermo Cabrera Infante, "Las fuentes de la narraci6n,"
Mundo Nuevo, July 1968, pp. 43-44.

32Guillermo Cabrera Infante, "Epilogue for Late(nt) Readers,"
Review, (Winter 71/Spring 72), p. 25.

"Ibid., pp. 25-26.

"3Carlos Fuentes, "On TTT," Review (Winter 71/Spring 72), p. 22.

"3Cabrera Infante, "Epilogue for Late(nt) Readers," p. 28.

36Harss, op. cit., pp..77-78.

"We shall dedicate an entire section of Chapter VI to the novelists'
use of humor.

38Fuentes, La nueva novela hispanoamericana, p. 46.

"Ibid., p. 56.









"Ibid.,

"Ibid., p. 72.

42Ibid., p. 85.
'Jean Michel Fossey, "M'iguel Angel Asturias on Literature," Arts
in Society, 5, No. 2 (Summer-Fall 1963), p. 354; Manuel M. Azaha and
Claude Mie, "Entrevista con Miguel Angel Asturias, Premio N6bel," Bulletin
Hispanique, January-June 1968, p. 139; Harss, op. cit., pp. 81-85.
'4Oscar Collazos et al., Literatura en la revoluci6n y revoluci6n en la
literature, 2nd ed. (Mexico: Siglo XXI, 197T1, p. 12.

"'Carpentier, Tientos y diferencias, pp. 37-38.

46Carpentier's dislike of the nouveau roman movement, incidentally,
is widely shared among today's Spanish American novelists, who consider
it too limiting and too impersonal.
4Reynaldo Gonzglez, "Un pulpo en una jarra minoana," p. 15.
4'GonzAlez Bermejo, op. cit., pp. 130-132.

'gHarss, op. cit., p. 271.

"Block, op. cit.,- pp. 117-118.

51Harss, op. cit., p. .274.

52"Sbato, El escritor y sus fantasmas, pp. 210-214.

"I.bid., p. 213.

54Ibid.

"Ibid., p. 214.

6"Ibid., p. 38.
"SThe first part of this statement seems highly debatable. We find
it impossible to believe that Shakespeare and Dante were unaware of the
beauty of their verse.

58Sabato, El escritor y sus fantasmas, pp. 207-208.

59Harss, op. cit., p. 336.

6"Guibert, op. cit., p. 417.

"Cortdzar, Rayuela, pp. 538-539.









"I2bid., p. 539.

63Harss, op. cit., p. 234.

64Santana, "La vuelta a Cort6zar en 80 rounds," p. 9.

s6Cortazar, Rayuela, p. 500.

"From La vuelta al dia en ochenta mundos, quoted in Block, op.
cit., p..56.

"Guillermo Cabrera Infante, Tres tristes tigres, 2nd.ed.
(Barcelona: Seix Barral, 1971), p. 46;

"Ibid., p. 208.

69Ibid., p. 386.

7oCortazar, Rayuela, p. 506.

71Ibid., p. 379

72Cabrera Infante, Tres tristes tigres, p. 209.

?3Cortazar, Rayuela, p. 473.

7Ibid., p. 430

75Block, op. cit., pp. 69-70.

'6Cortazar, Rayuela, p. 428.

7Guibert, op. cit., p. 408.
7BCabrera Infante, Tres tristes tigres, p. 325.

"Ibid., p. 209.

8OCortazar, Rayuela, p. 279.

aiCortazar, Ultimo round, p. 143, "primer piso."

82Cited in Emir Rodriguez Monegal, "Conversaci6n con Severo Sarduy,"
Revista de Occidente, December 1970, pp. 329-330.

83Mario Vargas Llosa, "The Latin American Novel Today: Introduction,"
Books Abroad, 44, No. 1 (Winter 1970), p. 10.

8Guibert, op. cit., p. 407.













CHAPTER III
FORM, TECHNIQUE AND STYLE IN THE
CONTEMPORARY NOVEL

The "Total" Novel; the "Open" Novel

In the preceding chapter, we noted that Fuentes, in commenting on

the language in Carpentier's novels, said that thecontemporary novel

strives for total language, for going beyond traditional word structures-,

just as contemporary music strives to be total sound, going beyond the

traditional structural elements of melody and harmony. This "total"

language that today's novelists are seeking is the instrument which

they feel to be the most adequate to achieve what is commonly referred

to as the "total novel."' It is a concept of the novel shared by the

majority of today's novelists in Spanish America, and, consequently, it

is important to define its structure.

The hidden forces in Spanish American literature present ever since

the conquest have now flowered, according to Lezama Lima, opening the

possibilities of a comprehensive open novel. The chroniclers of the

conquest, for example, had the ability to synthesize the ancestral and

the new, the mythical and the real. This ability serves today's novelist

well, he says, for in today's literature, here and now no longer limit us

to a given time and space. Here means planetary unity and now means the

flying point of time, liberation from time, thus breaking the shackles of

the old novel's taboos. The Spanish American novel today, he states, is

neither strictly a novel nor Spanish American, but rather what he terms









"el relate supraverbo de lo entrevisto, la fiesta del nacimiento de

nuevos sentidos." The contemporary novel opens up new vistas, new

ways of focusing on the totality of human.experience. If we can achieve

that goal, he says, the novel will be so compelling that, despite its

lack of traditional form and content, it will force the reader to accept it

as a novel and as a new paradigm of the novel form.2

Ernesto Sabato traces3 the ideal of the total novel' back to.the

beginnings of the novel. He says that historically, all. the great

novels have been attempts to be total novels in the sense that they

presented the widest possible view of mankind and the human condition.

From Cervantes to Proust and Joyce, the novel has constantly sought to

expand its vision. In the novels of Sir Walter Scott, Sabato finds

drama, portraits, dialogue, descriptions of scenery, fantasy and

reality, poetry and the most humble peasant language; ideas, good and

evil, scenes of family life, and other elements which contributed toward

creating as total a picture as possible of the society he was trying to

capture in his novels. Today's novel, in SMbato's view, must be even

more wide-ranging, still more comprehensive, by incorporating the functions

which in the past belonged exclusively to the epic, poetry and confessions,

the moral treatise and the essay. Such a broad-based construct is easier

to achieve in the twentieth century, due to the fact that today the

novel is no longer limited by the scientific, positivistic tenets of

the nineteenth-century narrative. Today's novel can present a total

view, not only of the outside world, but also of the inside world of

man's mind, reaching into the deepest strata of the unconscious (e.g.,

the hallucinatory "Informe sobre ciegos" in SMbato's Sobre heroes y,









tumbas). The contemporary novel is a hybrid product which looks into

the world of light and the world of shadows, reason and instincts, the

rational and the irrational, fantasy and everyday reality, the worlds

of magic and mythology. The goal of the novelist is to create an

artistic synthesis of as many of these elements as possible. Today's

novel, Sabato states, tends toward becoming what he calls a "metaphysical

poem"-"metaphysical" in that it delves into the ultimate nature of

reality on an intellectual, abstract plane; a "poem" because it is

man's (the novelist's) subjective view of the subject, without pre-

tensions of scientific precision or truth. Today's novel, unlike its

predecessors, does not seek to demonstrate or prove anything as a

scientist would-it wishes only to show what exists, as completely

as possible, but always with the realization that the viewpoint is

subjective.' In such a total view of the world, the novel easily goes

beyond the old literary dilemmas which were so restricting simply because

they were perceived as mutually exclusive categories: e.g., the

"social" versus the "psychological" novel. There is no reason why a

total novel cannot synthesize both points of view. The role of the

contemporary novelist, then, is to integrate into a cohesive whole as

many facets of the complex reality of the modern world as he can.

SMbato cites James Joyce's Ulysses as an illustration of what he

is proposing, a form he calls a "jigsaw novel."' In Ulysses, Joyce

presents fragments which have little or no chronological or narrative

coherence among themselves, fragments of a complicated jigsaw puzzle

which will remain unfinished because many of its parts are missing,

while others remain half-hidden in the shadows, glimpsed only briefly









or vaguely by the reader. This is no arbitrary game, however. It is

a vision which reflects our perception of reality in life: the stream

of consciousness which simultaneously admits fragments from the many

diverse segments of the reality which surrounds us, creating a confusing

total mosaic which is the reality we experience at a given moment. The

traditional novel normally .chooses one facet out of the mosaic. The

contemporary novel, like Joyce's Ulysses, attempts, insofar as it is

possible, to include all. When it does, it will be realistic in the

best, most far-reaching sense of that term.

The attempt to present a total view of reality creates a novel

characterized by complexity, difficulty, and even obscurity. The novel

is no longer two-dimensional and linear, it is three-dimensional and

follows many diverging paths and patterns.6

Such a multifaceted narrative is embodied in the chivalric novel,

according to Vargas Llosa. He states that for the writers of chivalric

novels reality was a multi-faceted thing which consisted of everything

that existed (exterior reality-the daily life of the medieval castles),

the rational and the irrational, real beings of flesh.and blood in their

many emotional states (love, hate, sorrow, happiness, etc.), and beings

which existed only in the collective imagination and terror of the

age, such as fabulous monsters, dragons or fairies. The creators of

these novels of chivalry had a total view of reality. They did not

exclude anything, and were completely unconcerned with the "scientific"

provability of phenomena. This is the all-encompassing view that today's

novelist must have in order to create a total novel.7 As Vargas Llosa

puts it:. "Es que...la novela es el Onico gdnero donde el factor









cuantitativo es tan important como el cualitativo: mientras mds

niveles de la realidad, mientras mAs pianos de la experiencia humana

puedas apresar, mas profunda, m6s rica y ambiciosa sera tu novela."8

Vargas Llosa goes on to say that a novel which limits its scope to a

single facet of reality-the psychological novel, for example-mutilates

the reality which it attempts to portray, i.n that it cuts off a wide

band of experiences.and perceptions which are not strictly psychological.

The novel should seek not to limit or deform reality but to expand it.

That is precisely what Vargas Llosa says he attempted to do in La

ciudad y os perros, working always with the total vision of the

chivalric novel in mind. In writing his first novel, he states that

he tried to focus on a given reality through multiple viewpoints-each

viewpoint being embodied in a different character. Thus Alberto "el

poeta" is a sensitive, perceptive boy; "Boa" is a vicious, instinctive,

almost animal-like ruffian, etc. Each of these diverse characters acts

as a prism, breaking down the external "reality" into subjective view-

points, colored by the personality and mentality of each character. In

this way, Vargas Llosa hoped to show not only the irreality of an

objective "reality" but the multiple planes of what is perceived as

reality.9 He sums up his idea of the total novel as follows:

I think every method, every procedure must be
conditioned by the fictional material at hand. The
best novels are always those that exhaust their material,
that don't throw a single light on reality but many.
The points of view that can be brought to bear on
reality are infinite. It's impossible, of course,
for any novel to exhaust all of them. But a novel will
be greater and vaster in proportion to the number of
levels of reality it presents.... In more recent
times there has been a sort of decadence, a shrivel-
ing of the novel. Modern ventures into the novel form









attempt to give only a single vision,.to portray a
single aspect of reality. I'm in favor of the
opposite: the all-encompassing novel that aspires
to embrace reality in all its facets, in all its.
manifestations. It can-never fulfill itself at
all levels. But the greater its diversity, the
broader the vision of reality, the more complete
the novel will be.1'

Vargas Llosa sees this desire to totally recreate'reality in the novel

as being a total rejection of present-day reality in Latin America. He

believes that European and North American novelists rarely attempt to

write a "total" novel nowadays because the crises which are agitating

their societies are not nearly so profound as those shaking the very

foundations of Latin American society today. The Latin American novelist

rejects completely his contemporary society, and that is why he must

recreate his own version of reality in the novel." For Vargas Llosa,

the perfect example of a total novel is Gabriel GarcTa MArquez's Cien

aios de soledad. It describes a total reality, a self-contained world

from its birth to its death in all its multiple manifestations--the

individual and the collective, the legendary and the historical, daily

and mythical reality.1

The most outspoken advocate of giving the concept of the novel a

wider, more far-reaching, more "liberal" interpretation is Julio

Cortazar. He proposes that the novel should be open to all sorts of

"extraliterary" influences. He asks how long we must go on clinging to

the antiquated ideas of libraries and books (as we presently define them).

While he derides the "scholars" in their ivory towers who are scandalized

by any attempt to bring extraliterary subject matter or form into the'

novel, Cortazar claims such freedom to be his and every other novelist's









right, .equating it with the daring gesture of Prometheus when he stole

fire fromthe gods of his day."1 He says, for example, that as he

writes, the'central theme on which he is concentrating his attention

functions as a lightning rod, attracting to it not only those topics

directly related to the central theme, but also others indirectly or

tangentially related, or even completely unrelated. These "peripheral"

themes, which to some may seem unliteraryy," fcrm something like a

circle around the central theme. Cortdzar states that for him, the

only honorable solution is to accept these peripheral themes as integral

parts of the novel, and incorporate them as passages or fragments of

the novel, as he did in Rayuela, in which many of the so-called "dis-

pensable chapters" (as well as some of the "indispensable chapters")

were of this peripheral or extraliterary nature."4 In fact, Cortdzar

says he is more and more interested in what he calls "literature of

exceptions" nowadays. He finds the exceptions more interesting than the

laws. He says that the poet should dedicate himself to the exceptions

and leave the laws to the scientists and the "serious" writers (the

term "serious writers," as used by Cortdzar, is derogatory, denoting lack

of imagination and inventiveness). He states that exceptions "offer

what I call an opening or a fracture, and also, in a sense, a hope.

I'll go into my grave without having lost the hope that one morning

the sun will rise in the west. It exasperates me with its obedience

and obstinacy, things that wouldn't bother a classical writer all that

much." 5

Cortazar believes that the novel is the genre which best lends

itself to this openness or totality. He states that the short story




University of Florida Home Page
© 2004 - 2010 University of Florida George A. Smathers Libraries.
All rights reserved.

Acceptable Use, Copyright, and Disclaimer Statement
Last updated October 10, 2010 - Version 2.9.7 - mvs