• TABLE OF CONTENTS
HIDE
 Title Page
 Acknowledgement
 Table of Contents
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Review of related literature
 Research methodology
 Results and discussion
 Summary, conclusions, and...
 Appendix A
 Appendix B
 References
 Biographical sketch






Group Title: work values and career maturity of community college transfer and native students /
Title: The Work values and career maturity of community college transfer and native students
CITATION PDF VIEWER THUMBNAILS PAGE IMAGE ZOOMABLE
Full Citation
STANDARD VIEW MARC VIEW
Permanent Link: http://ufdc.ufl.edu/UF00097508/00001
 Material Information
Title: The Work values and career maturity of community college transfer and native students
Physical Description: vii, 131 leaves : ; 28cm.
Language: English
Creator: Keith, Edwin Monroe, 1948- ( Dissertant )
Wittmer, Joe ( Thesis advisor )
Meek, Phyllis ( Reviewer )
Riker, Harold ( Reviewer )
Sandeen, Arthur ( Reviewer )
McBailes, B. A. ( Degree grantor )
Publisher: University of Florida
Place of Publication: Gainesville, Fla.
Publication Date: 1976
 Subjects
Subjects / Keywords: Counselor Education thesis Ph. D
College students -- Psychology -- Florida   ( lcsh )
Vocational interests -- Florida   ( lcsh )
Dissertations, Academic -- Counselor Education -- UF
Genre: bibliography   ( marcgt )
non-fiction   ( marcgt )
 Notes
Abstract: The purpose of the study was to compare the orientation to work values and the level of career maturity of community college transfer and native students at the University of Florida and to determine the relationship between work values and career maturity. It was hypothesized that no differences would exist in either the work values, as measured by the Work Values Inventory (WVI) , or the career maturity, as measured by the Career Maturity Inventory (CMI) Attitude Scale of transfer and native students as a function of (a) sex, (b) Upper Division college, (c) father's occupation, (d) mother's occupation, (e) cumulative college grade-point average (GPA, (f) age, or (g) parents' yearly income. It was also hypothesized that no relationship would exist between the work values and career maturity of transfer students, native students or both groups combined. Alphabetized lists with the current local addresses were obtained from the Registrar and Admissions Office for (1) all juniors who had entered an Upper Division collegeat the University of Floridafor the first time Fall Quarter 1975 directly from Florida community colleges and (2) all first-quarter juniors in Upper Division in the 1975 Fall Quarter who had been enrolled as full-time students only at the University of Florida. From the lists 150 transfer and 150 native students were randomly selected to be subjects in this study. Each subject was mailed a large envelope containing a letter, a questionnaire, the Work Values Inventory (WVI) , the Career Maturity Inventory (CMI) Attitude Scale, and a self-addressed, stamped envelope. Usable data were returned by 62.7% of the transfer students and 60.7% of the native students. The analysis of the data was accomplished through the use of the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) computer subprograms. Independent t tests were used to compare the mean \«A7I scores and the mean CMI scores of transfer and native students. Both WVI and CMI scores of the two groups as a function of age and of cumulative college GPA were determined by finding the Pearson product-moment correlations, employing the z' transformation with the correlations, then finding the significance of difference between the correlations of transfers and of natives. Pearson product-moment correlations and their respective significance were also used to determine the relationship of WVI scores to CMI scores. The difference between the native and transfer students' WVI scores as well as the difference in their CMI scores as a function of sex. Upper Division college in which they were enrolled, parents' yearly income, father's occupation, and mother's occupation was determined through analyses of variance. The level of significance was .05 for all analyses. Few differences were found in the demographic characteristics, work values, or career maturity of transfer and native students. Transfer and native students were found to differ markedly only in socioeconomic status (with transfers being lower) , and the only significant differences in work values of the two groups were a function of socioeconomic status. Significant differences were found on the Associates scale of the WVI as a function of father's occupation and group (whether native or transfer) combined, and on the Creativity, Management, Security, and Independence scales as a function of mother's occupation and group combined. No significant differences were found in the CMI scores of transfer and native students as a function of any of the variables examined. The work values and career maturity of the subjects were found to be significantly related. A significant negative relationship was determined to exist between the Management scale of the \W1 and CMI score for transfer students, native students, and both groups combined.
Thesis: Thesis--University of Florida.
Bibliography: Bibliography: leaves 122-129.
Statement of Responsibility: by Edwin Monroe Keith, Jr.
General Note: Typescript.
General Note: Vita.
 Record Information
Bibliographic ID: UF00097508
Volume ID: VID00001
Source Institution: University of Florida
Holding Location: University of Florida
Rights Management: All rights reserved by the source institution and holding location.
Resource Identifier: alephbibnum - 000163742
oclc - 02762616
notis - AAT0099

Downloads

This item has the following downloads:

PDF ( 4 MBs ) ( PDF )


Table of Contents
    Title Page
        Page i
    Acknowledgement
        Page ii
    Table of Contents
        Page iii
        Page iv
    Abstract
        Page v
        Page vi
        Page vii
    Introduction
        Page 1
        Page 2
        Page 3
        Page 4
        Page 5
        Page 6
        Page 7
        Page 8
        Page 9
    Review of related literature
        Page 10
        Page 11
        Page 12
        Page 13
        Page 14
        Page 15
        Page 16
        Page 17
        Page 18
        Page 19
        Page 20
        Page 21
        Page 22
        Page 23
        Page 24
        Page 25
        Page 26
        Page 27
        Page 28
        Page 29
        Page 30
        Page 31
        Page 32
        Page 33
        Page 34
        Page 35
        Page 36
        Page 37
        Page 38
        Page 39
        Page 40
        Page 41
        Page 42
        Page 43
        Page 44
        Page 45
        Page 46
        Page 47
        Page 48
        Page 49
    Research methodology
        Page 50
        Page 51
        Page 52
        Page 53
        Page 54
        Page 55
        Page 56
        Page 57
        Page 58
        Page 59
        Page 60
        Page 61
        Page 62
        Page 63
        Page 64
    Results and discussion
        Page 65
        Page 66
        Page 67
        Page 68
        Page 69
        Page 70
        Page 71
        Page 72
        Page 73
        Page 74
        Page 75
        Page 76
        Page 77
        Page 78
        Page 79
        Page 80
        Page 81
        Page 82
        Page 83
        Page 84
        Page 85
        Page 86
        Page 87
        Page 88
        Page 89
        Page 90
        Page 91
        Page 92
        Page 93
        Page 94
        Page 95
        Page 96
        Page 97
        Page 98
        Page 99
        Page 100
        Page 101
        Page 102
        Page 103
        Page 104
        Page 105
        Page 106
        Page 107
        Page 108
        Page 109
        Page 110
    Summary, conclusions, and recommendations
        Page 111
        Page 112
        Page 113
        Page 114
        Page 115
        Page 116
        Page 117
        Page 118
    Appendix A
        Page 119
    Appendix B
        Page 120
        Page 121
    References
        Page 122
        Page 123
        Page 124
        Page 125
        Page 126
        Page 127
        Page 128
        Page 129
    Biographical sketch
        Page 130
        Page 131
        Page 132
        Page 133
University of Florida Home Page
© 2004 - 2010 University of Florida George A. Smathers Libraries.
All rights reserved.

Acceptable Use, Copyright, and Disclaimer Statement
Last updated October 10, 2010 - Version 2.9.9 - mvs