|
![]() |
|
| UFDC Home |
| Help | RSS
|
|

HIDE
| Cover | |
| Title Page | |
| Contributors | |
| Foreword | |
| Table of Contents | |
| Introduction | |
| Part I: Economic trends | |
| Part II: Social trends | |
| Part III: Literary and artistic... | |
| Part IV: Political and diplomatic... | |
| Part V: Peace and security... | |
| Index |
CITATION
SEARCH
THUMBNAILS
PAGE IMAGE
ZOOMABLE
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Full Citation | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
STANDARD VIEW
MARC VIEW
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Table of Contents | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Cover
Page i Page ii Title Page Page iii Page iv Contributors Page v Page vi Foreword Page vii Page viii Table of Contents Page ix Page x Introduction Page xi Page xii Page xiii Page xiv Page xv Page xvi Page xvii Page xviii Page xix Page xx Page xxi Page xxii Page xxiii Page xxiv Page xxv Page xxvi Part I: Economic trends Page 1 Page 2 Page 3 Page 4 Page 5 Page 6 Page 7 Page 8 Page 9 Page 10 Page 11 Page 12 Page 13 Page 14 Page 15 Page 16 Page 17 Page 18 Page 19 Page 20 Page 21 Page 22 Page 23 Page 24 Page 25 Page 26 Page 27 Page 28 Page 29 Page 30 Page 31 Page 32 Page 33 Page 34 Page 35 Page 36 Page 37 Page 38 Page 39 Page 40 Page 41 Page 42 Page 43 Page 44 Page 45 Page 46 Page 47 Page 48 Page 49 Page 50 Page 51 Page 52 Page 53 Page 54 Page 55 Page 56 Part II: Social trends Page 57 Page 58 Page 59 Page 60 Page 61 Page 62 Page 63 Page 64 Page 65 Page 66 Page 67 Page 68 Page 69 Page 70 Page 71 Page 72 Page 73 Page 74 Page 75 Page 76 Page 77 Page 78 Page 79 Page 80 Page 81 Page 82 Page 83 Page 84 Page 85 Page 86 Page 87 Page 88 Part III: Literary and artistic trends Page 89 Page 90 Page 91 Page 92 Page 93 Page 94 Page 95 Page 96 Page 97 Page 98 Page 99 Page 100 Page 101 Page 102 Page 103 Page 104 Page 105 Page 106 Page 107 Page 108 Page 109 Page 110 Page 111 Page 112 Page 113 Page 114 Page 115 Page 116 Page 117 Page 118 Page 119 Page 120 Page 121 Page 122 Page 123 Page 124 Page 125 Page 126 Page 127 Page 128 Page 129 Page 130 Page 131 Page 132 Page 133 Page 134 Page 135 Page 136 Page 137 Page 138 Part IV: Political and diplomatic trends Page 139 Page 140 Page 141 Page 142 Page 143 Page 144 Page 145 Page 146 Page 147 Page 148 Page 149 Page 150 Page 151 Page 152 Page 153 Page 154 Page 155 Page 156 Page 157 Page 158 Page 159 Page 160 Page 161 Page 162 Page 163 Page 164 Page 165 Page 166 Page 167 Page 168 Page 169 Page 170 Page 171 Page 172 Page 173 Page 174 Page 175 Page 176 Page 177 Page 178 Page 179 Page 180 Page 181 Page 182 Page 183 Page 184 Page 185 Page 186 Page 187 Page 188 Page 189 Page 190 Page 191 Page 192 Page 193 Page 194 Page 195 Page 196 Page 197 Page 198 Page 199 Page 200 Page 201 Page 202 Part V: Peace and security trends Page 203 Page 204 Page 205 Page 206 Page 207 Page 208 Page 209 Page 210 Page 211 Page 212 Page 213 Page 214 Page 215 Page 216 Page 217 Page 218 Page 219 Page 220 Page 221 Page 222 Page 223 Page 224 Page 225 Page 226 Page 227 Page 228 Page 229 Page 230 Page 231 Page 232 Page 233 Page 234 Page 235 Page 236 Page 237 Page 238 Page 239 Page 240 Page 241 Page 242 Page 243 Page 244 Page 245 Page 246 Page 247 Page 248 Page 249 Page 250 Page 251 Page 252 Page 253 Page 254 Page 255 Page 256 Page 257 Page 258 Page 259 Page 260 Page 261 Page 262 Page 263 Page 264 Page 265 Page 266 Page 267 Page 268 Page 269 Page 270 Page 271 Page 272 Page 273 Page 274 Page 275 Page 276 Page 277 Page 278 Page 279 Page 280 Page 281 Page 282 Page 283 Page 284 Page 285 Page 286 Index Page 287 Page 288 Page 289 Page 290 Page 291 Page 292 |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Full Text | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
SERIES OPIE SCHOOL OF VOLUME III A publication of the I nT ER-AMERICA I STUDIES which contains the papers delivered at the third annual conference on the Caribbean held at the University of Florida, December 18,19, and 20, 1952. ISSUED WITH ASSISTANCE FROM THE 97ALTER B. FRASER PUBLICATION FUND The CARIBBEAN: CONTEM PORARY TRENDS O l-"~CS G" i a i.r ~Jt3i ,.R~. i- a 2 Y 'u i a 4 r. I r ; 1? 1 fd I Pn; ~z C4 ~7 i \ I ~C1---Y ~J :ri 38 - i u~ S [-4y v, L. i p:o T-- a, ~-~7~I~c 1 j 'r 1953 UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA PRESS Gainesville The CARIBBEAN: CONTEMPORARY TRENDS edited by A. Curtis Wilgus AGiRi CULTURAL LIBRARY Copyright, 1953, by the UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA ALL RIGHTs RESERVED A University of Florida Press Bool L. C. Catalogue Card Number: 53-11390 Printed by THE H. 19 W. B. DREW COMPANY JACKSONVILLE, FLORIDA JOHN AKIN, Director, Western Hemisphere Division, National Foreign Trade Council, Inc. RICARDo J. ALFARO, President, International Law Commission; Former President of the Republic of Panama FRANK K. BELL, Vice President, Alcoa Steamship Company, Inc. JOHN BIESANz, Associate Professor, Department of Sociology and Anthropology, Wayne University, and MAVIS BIESANZ R. S. BOGcs, Director, Hispanic-American Institute, University of Miami MIRON BURGIN, Chief, Division of Research for American Re- publics, Department of State JAMES B. CHILDs, Chief Documents Officer, The Library of Congress HAROLD E. DAVIs, Director of Inter-American Studies, The American University JOHN C. DREIER, United States Representative on the Council of the Organization of American States JosiE GOMEz SICRE, Chief, Visual Arts Section, Pan American Union GILBERTO Lovo and RAIL ORTIZ MENA, Escuela Nacional de Economia, Universidad Nacional Aut6noma de Mixico J. HILLIS MILLER, President, University of Florida EUGENE B. MIROVITCH, Vice President for Latin America, Mer- genthaler Linotype Company Conttributors vi The Caribbean E. A. NORTON, Assistant Chief, Soil Conservation Service, De- partment of Agriculture MISAEL PASTRANA, Minister Counselor, Embassy of Colombia LuIs QUINTANILLA, Ambassador of Mexico to the Organization of American States SIR HUBERT ELVIN RANCE, Governor and Commander-in-Chief of Trinidad and Tobago, B. W. I. FERNANDO RIVERA, Head, Latin American Section, Public Ad- ministration Division, United Nations Technical Assistance Administration CARL C. TAYLOR, Head, Division of Farm Population and Rural Life, Department of Agriculture RAFAEL HELIODORO VALLE, Ambassador of Honduras to the United States FRANCIs VIOLICH, Associate Professor, Department of City and Regional Planning, University of California A. CURTIS WILGUS, Director, School of Inter-American Studies, University of Florida ONCE AGAIN a successful conference on the Caribbean has been held under the joint auspices of the University of Florida and the Aluminum Company of America through its subsidiary, the Alcoa Steamship Company, Inc. We feel that we have inaugurated on our campus a valuable means for the study and analysis of the problems of an important region of Latin America. We are especially delighted that students, scholars, businessmen, and government officials from the countries of the hemisphere can come together for the exchange of ideas re- garding this area. Publication of the papers read each year at these meetings will give the deliberations of these authorities a permanent quality in a series of volumes available to students of the Caribbean. The searchlight of expert criticism and judgment directed at the countries immediately south of us helps in understanding all aspects of their civilization and cul- ture. For the Caribbean today is a laboratory where all phases of broader Latin American problems may be examined in an empirical fashion. Therefore, our continued concentration on the Caribbean, for the time being at least, seems highly desir- able. It is our firm belief and hope that eventually this con- tinued cooperative effort by contributors to the conferences will result in benefits to the peoples and governments of the area itself. J. HILLIS MILLER, President University of Florida Foreword Conttents Map of Caribbean Area ......Frontispiece List of Contributors ........... v FOTOWord-J. HILLIS MILLER......... VII Introduction--A. CURTIS WILGUS . .. . . Xi Part I ECONOMIC TRENDS 1. E. A. Norton: CONSERVATION PROBLEMS IN THE CARIBBEAN AREA ..... 3 2. MlrOH BurglH: SOME PROBLEMS OF ECONOMIC DE- VELOPMENT IN THE CARIBBEAN AREA. .. 15 3. Gilberto Loyo and Rai'l Ortiz Mena: PROBLEMS OF UNDERDEVELOPED AREAS IN THE CARIBBEAN 27 4. Frank K. Bell: TRANSPORTATION IN THE CARIBBEAN 36 5. John Akin: ENVIRONMENT FOR UNITED STATES ENTERPRISES IN THE CARIBBEAN ... 47 Part II SOCIAL TRENDS 6. Carl C. Taylor: SOME LAND SITUATIONS AND PROB- LEMS IN CARIBBEAN COUNTRIES. 59 7. Francis Violich: URBANIZATION IN VENEZUELA-- AN OBJECT LESSON FOR THE CARIBBEAN AREA 74 Part III LITERARY AND ARTISTIC TRENDS 8. R. S. Boggs: CARIBBEAN BALLADS OF THE SPANISH CONQUEST ..... 91 x The Caribbean 9. JosC G6mez Sicre: SOME ASPECTS OF ART IN THE CARIBBEAN AREA .....100 10. Rafael Heliodoro Valle: HISPANIC AMERICAN JOUR- NALISM IN THE CARIBBEAN AREA ...114 11. Eugene B. Mirovitch: LATIN AMERICAN PUBLISHING AND PRINTING-IMPRESSIONS OF TWENTY-FIVE YEARS .121 Part IV~ POLITICAL AND DIPLOMATIC TRENDS 12. Harold E. Davis: POLITICAL PHILOSOPHIES IN THE CARIBBEAN .....141 13. Fernando Rivera: THE CIVL SERVICE--ITS IMPOR- TANCE FOR A SOUND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM 160 14. Ricardo J. Alfaro: OLD AND NEW DIPLOMACY . 172 15. John and Mavis Biesanz: UNCLE SAM ON THE ISTHMUS OF PANAMA--A DIPLOMATIC CASE HISTORY .. 185 Part V PEACE AND SECURITY TRENDS 16. John C. Dreier: THE RIO TREATY AND HEMISPHERE DEFENSE .......205 17. Luis Quintanilla: PEACE AND COLLECTIVE SECURITY IN AMERICA .. . .. 214 18. Misael Pastrana: PAN AMERICANISM--ITS CONTRIBU- TION TO WORLD PEACE . . 226 19. Sir Hubert Elvin Rance: TOWARDS A FEDERATION OF THE BRITISH WEST INDIES ....241 20. James B. Childs: CARIBBEAN AND SOUTH AMERICAN TREATY MATTERS--A CONSIDERATION OF SOURCES 257 Index . . . . . . 287 BASIC to an appreciation of present "trends" in the Carib- bean area is an understanding of political and constitutional development during more than a century. Too often we in this country lose sight of the fact that in their political practices and psychoses the people south of us are acting historically and, as viewed by themselves, logically. Hence an understanding of the practical politics of these peoples is fundamental to a comprehension of their social, economic, and cultural life. Past and present political trends in the Caribbean area are both interesting and instructive. Like the United States, each of the countries has a constitution. The first constitutions of these countries were created after they had won their inde- pendence, several being copied, with some changes, from that of the United States. In seeking independence some of these states also adapted our Declaration of Independence to their needs. And when they had achieved independence, they natu- rally set up governments with many of the characteristics and political practices of the great republic to the north. Constitutions in Latin American countries vary greatly in length. When the first ones were written, the framers tried to limit their political instruments to relatively few words; but today the Mexican constitution contains about forty-five thou- rand words, whereas ours, by way of contrast, contains about Forty-four hundred words. It is difficult for the Latin American :0 say anything briefly; since the constitutions are literary as lyell as political documents, many words must be used in their instructionn. Introduction xii The Caribbean In the more than a century since the first constitutions were formed, their contents have undergone numerous modifications. In some cases ideas from the British constitution have been added; in other instances, ideas from the French constitution. Often the revisionists were not content simply to take ideas from other peoples but added their own views of what government should be. Sometimes their constitutions became political patch- works so that it was impossible to use them efficiently. In Latin America a national constitution is often considered first and foremost a literary masterpiece. Many of the people who put together constitutions are literary men. They think in terms of legal fiction rather than in terms of practical policies. Sometimes a constitution is formulated to meet a particular situation, only to be discarded later in favor of another. A constitution sometimes is used to try out political ideologies which may be wholly impracticable. Very often it carries more philosophical verbiage than workable ideas. Constitutions are often used by dictators to camouflage their dictatorships. Let us look at Latin American governments in general and try to analyze the political psychoses behind the practical politics as conceived by many Latin American political leaders. Each constitution has an amending clause. In the early con- stitutions of the last century this clause followed the phraseology used in our own Constitution; but the method proved too slow for volatile Latin American political temperaments. As a result, a clause was incorporated into some constitutions which stated that the constitution might never be amended, or that it might be amended only at the end of a period of years. In some instances the national legislative body might amend the constitu- tion. But no matter what system for amending the constitutions was provided, all methods proved too tedious. The simplest process to use in constitutional amendment was to abolish a constitution and replace it by an entirely new one. As a result, INTRODUCTION a number of the states have had a dozen or more constitutions in little more than a hundred years. This frequent change has been justified on the ground that "change is a sign of progress." The United States, some Latin American leaders believe, has lagged behind in constitutional development since we have had one constitution for so long a time. III The franchise in Latin American constitutions was decidedly limited during the first century of political development. Many people were denied the right to vote. Included among these were members of the military, persons whose income had not reached a certain level, daily laborers, all who worked at menial tasks, inmates of criminal and charitable institutions, and, until recently, all women. In most of the countries today men are allowed to vote at the age of 21 and women, when they have the right, at the age of 18. In some countries if a man is married and 18 he may vote. Generally, college students because of their age do not have the right to vote; but in many countries they exercise an in- fluence in politics out of all proportion to their numbers. Most Latin American students graduate from college about two years earlier than those in the United States. This is chiefly due to the fact that the Latin American student completes only ten grades instead of twelve before he begins his higher education. This means that the average age of the university student at any level in Latin America is about two years under the average age at the same level in our own universities. Students in Latin America, as in this country, are extremely interested in political affairs. The instructors in universities are frequently professional men--lawyers, doctors, and others--who teach part time to augment their salaries or because they enjoy the work. When a political campaign occurs in a Latin Ameri- can country, many of these part-time teachers take an active part. They cannot, of course, avoid talking in class about po- The Caribbean litical subjects, whether the course is in the sciences or other fields of knowledge. And the students there, as elsewhere, always like to have the professor get off the classroom subject and talk about something of greater interesting In consequence, the profes- sor often influences his students to support his favorite candidate. This support may take the form of student soap-box speeches on the street corners in favor of a particular candidate. As the citizens listen to these orators, they in turn are often influenced by what they hear. For are not these students educated and are they not obviously thinkers in matters of politics? As a political campaign draws toward an end and the day of election approaches, students at the university will frequently hold a political rally. This may be a torchlight procession in the evening, or it may be a daytime parade. In any case, the stu- dents usually display banners and placards with slogans and their candidate's name. When such a procession is held, the citizens along the street may take exception to the slogans and hurl mis- cellaneous objects at the students. The latter will usually react in like manner and frequently a small riot develops. Thereupon, the police are called out. They usually arrest the student leader and take him to jail, where he is to be kept over- night. Even though the procession may be broken up by the police, the students are likely to re-form in front of the jail and rescue their leader. His arrest has been taken by each of the paraders as an individual insult and a blot on the university's good name. The rescued leader will be carried back to the uni- versity buildings on the shoulders of his friends. There the stu- dents will barricade themselves and defy the police to come and retake their leader. Shortly, the news of this disturbance spreads all over the city. Friends and relatives line the side- walks outside the university buildings and cheer on the students, who thereby acquire a feeling of self-importance and the assur- ance that they are supported by the townspeople in their stand for the candidate. Finally, stubborn student opposition may go so far that the army is called out to threaten the students with expulsion by INTRODUCTION force from the university buildings. This makes the students even more defiant, and the chances are that they will now begin to destroy school property, throwing chairs, tables, typewriters, and so on, out of the windows. Possibly the fire department will attempt to shoot water through the windows to dampen the students' ardor. Sooner or later the president of the republic, who usually has the right to appoint the president or rector of the university and to assist in organizing the curriculum, will take a hand. He may order the university to be closed and tell the students to go home since there will be no more classes for some time--occasionally for years! When students demonstrate in this manner, it is often a signal for persons engaged in transportation and other activities to go on strike out of sympathy for the students. These individuals probably have been thinking of striking for some time but they have lacked the incentive, the opportunity, the courage. A stu- dent disturbance makes their strike possible. Thus, a great deal of attention may be called to a political candidate by virtue of the activities of students who cannot vote. I'V Elections are held in Latin American countries on holidays and holy days, since more people are free to vote than on week- days, when many are engaged in various business and labor pursuits. The polling places are usually open from early in the morning until sunset. The army generally serves as police to watch the voting. This fact is considered by many to be a form of intimidation practiced by the government to insure that its particular candidate may win the election. In some countries voting is compulsory and secret. For several generations in a number of Latin American coun- tries it has been the custom for persons who have the right to vote to exercise this political privilege as often as they find it possible during a single election. This is true especially if they The Caribbean receive pay for each vote. Even participation of women in politics does not improve the political morals or the standard of honesty in voting. In more and more countries it has become customary to mark a finger of each voter with some sort of indelible ink after he has exercised his franchise. This sign cannot be removed before the voting places are closed in the evening, and therefore he is unable to vote more than once. It is also proof that the voter has performed his patriotic duty toward democracy. Women have been voting in Latin America in increasing numbers in the past two decades. Following the first World War a number of American suffragettes discovered that Latin American women did not have the franchise. They also dis- covered that the constitutions of most Latin American countries did not actually exclude women from voting. Apparently no one in Latin America who formulated constitutions had given much thought to the possibility that women might some time wish to have the vote. When the good ladies from the United States called these facts to the attention of political leaders in Latin America and asked why women could not vote, the men suddenly awoke to the startling fact that the women were, ac- cording to the constitution, not excluded from the franchise. They immediately set about remedying this defect! As a result, the women of Latin American countries began to organize themselves, demanding the franchise. Slowly one country after another amended its constitution, or devised a new one, which allowed women to vote and to hold office. Today more than half of the republics allow women to vote. In some instances women may vote but cannot hold office; in other instances they can hold office but cannot vote. Sometimes they may vote in municipal elections but not in state and national elections. How- ever, at the present time women in all Latin American countries are becoming politically conscious and are using the right of suffrage to make many improvements and changes in their social and economic status. XV11 INTRODUCTION Every Latin American constitution provides for a national legislature. In a few instances in the past century the legisla- tures have consisted of one house, but in present-day practice they usually consist of an upper and a lower house, patterned somewhat after our own Congress. The upper house may be called a senate or some other name. In any case, it is very similar to our upper house of Congress and members have many of the same functions and privileges that our senators have. Members of the lower house are usually elected on the basis of proportional representation. Their privileges correspond to those of the mem- bers of our House of Representatives. In some instances con- gressmen are chosen for a two-year term or a four- or six-year term. They all enjoy inmunities similar to those enjoyed by members of our congress. Everyone in Latin America interested in politics hopes some day to achieve a position where he can make rules or regulations or laws for other people. In colonial days when there was a king who made the laws it was believed that the ruler could do no wrong. It was also believed that the king was above the law. Naturally, the king would make no laws which would limit his authority. Nowadays lawmakers like to think of themselves as potential kings, above the law. Hence they make laws for other people. They do not necessarily expect to obey the laws them- selves, because that might limit their rights of making laws. They feel that the laws they make are necessary and good; otherwise they would not be trusted to make laws. They have great respect for law, because it is something to which they have given a great deal of study and thought. They do not always obey laws, however, despite this respect. Take for example traffic laws. Red and green lights are provided to control traffic. A man hurrying to keep an engagement for which he is already late does not stop at a red traffic light, because he believes that the law was made by a person who felt that no one should be late for an engagement just because the traffic light happened to xviii The Caribbean be red. These laws were made for other people, not for him. Lawmakers in Latin America frequently feel that they have a commodity for sale. Or if they have friends who need as- sistance, they may be able to modify the law in their favor. Hence, favoritism and the spoils system are widely practiced. Laws are often formulated to benefit personally the individual who administers the law. Friends are given important positions in order to enrich themselves or to enhance their social prestige. Generally speaking, the higher the political office the person holds, the higher his social level. No political officeholder in Latin America feels that he is adequately paid, any more than does such a person in this country. He cannot, he believes, support his family on his government salary. But, he reasons, the government would not want his family and himself to starve. In order not to starve he must sell some commodity or form of service. Or, he may attempt to increase his salary by various devices. For example, an official may receive the equivalent of $300 a month from his government office. He, however, needs $500 per month to live. At the end of each month he therefore holds a lottery among the five or six hundred employees of his department. He will charge each worker possibly a dollar; each one has a chance to win a check for $300 at the end of the month--and the official will get the amount he needs!i In this way, by taking advantage of the universal spirit of gambling, he can support his family in the way he feels befits his political position. ~VI Each constitution in Latin America provides for a supreme court, copied largely from our Supreme Court. However, when Franklin D. Roosevelt some years ago began to view with a critical eye the "nine old men" on the United States Supreme Court, the Latin American presidents began to raise questioning eyebrows at their own supreme court members. Generally, the members of the supreme courts in Latin America had been ap- INTRODUCTION XIX pointed, as in the United States, by the president, with the approval of the senate. But some had grown old in service; some had grown senile. Many were political opponents of the presi- dent. Evidently a revision of the supreme court was necessary in many of the Latin American countries. In some instances it was decided that a man should retire when he reached a certain age. Others were retired if they were found incompetent. Some could still serve for a period of good behavior. In some countries it was decided, however, to choose members of the supreme court at the time the president was chosen. In this case the length of the term coincided with that of the president. Members of the supreme court are generally considered at the highest social level in every Latin American country. Often, because of their age and the nature of their tenure, they out- rank the president in their social position. In some countries indeed the supreme court members have been so preoccupied with social affairs that they have seldom met to consider con- stitutional matters. In one Caribbean country, for example, the supreme court did not meet for a long period of time. This caused a complaint on the part of the citizens for they wondered what function the supreme court really served in their country. When such public criticism was heard by the supreme court members, they met and declared unconstitutional all laws passed by the government for several previous years! This obviously was absurd, and they were laughed off the political stage. VII In each country there has been at one time or another a vice-president elected to serve usually for the same length of time as the president. In most of the Latin American countries, as in the United States for many years, the vice-president has been a figurehead, simply waiting for the president to die so that he might succeed him. In some Latin American countries the vice-president has been considered potentially dangerous, because, as some believe, he might attempt to have the president The Caribbean assassinated or overthrown so that he could succeed him. In these countries it was decided that a vice-president was not needed. In other countries, because the president's occupancy of the office was frequently hazardous and dangerous, it was considered necessary to have two vice-presidents. Thus, if a president was removed, a vice-president could immediately suc- ceed him and there still would be a spare vice-president to follow in case of another crisis. Presidents in Latin American countries have many of the constitutional characteristics of presidents of the United States, after whom they were originally patterned. There is a definite age limit in each country. The legal term of office, however, has varied in length from one year in some countries to six or more years in others. Latin American presidents, like presidents in the United States, come from various walks of life. Some are professional men; some are professional politicians; some are vegetarians or belong to weird religions, cults, or societies. Some have been illiterate, humorless, witless, or uncouth. And presi- dents may be of any color in Latin America. Generally speaking, a Latin American president may assume considerably more power than a president of the United States. Except in times of war or great emergency, our president cannot exercise dictatorial rights. In Latin American countries a presi- dent may take the initiative in changing a constitution. He, in fact, may even formulate a new constitution to substitute for an old one. Each constitution gives the president the power to de- clare, usually with permission of congress, a "state of siege." Frequently this means that congress adjourns, the constitution ceases to function, and the president legislates by decree. This makes him a greater legal dictator than a president of the United States could be. Many Latin American presidents use this loop- hole as a means of establishing legal dictatorship, for a Latin American president must be extremely strong-willed not to try out this clause in the constitution. When a Latin American president thinks he sees a threat to his government, he is quite likely to issue the declaration of a "state of siege." Technically, INTRODUCTION a "state of siege" must have a definite time limit. In actual practice, however, the "emergency" can be extended; sometimes it may last for years. How does a man in a Latin American country decide that he wants to run for the presidency? Suppose Sefior X suddenly becomes interested in politics. When he looks at the presidential incumbent he feels that he himself is much better than the man in the presidential palace. If he himself is better than the presi- dent, certainly he ought to run for the presidency. The country cannot afford a mediocre man in high office! When he talks to his family and friends about the matter, they agree with him. They feel that since he is a much better man than the president, he should run for the presidency. In a short time, Sef~ior X has a political following which is a personal following. Senior X probably will not disclose his political ideas during the campaign for fear of losing some of his support, though he will always say that he stands for God, Country, and Home. Persons will follow him largely because they like his looks, or they like his wife, or they like the sound of his voice. Possibly he will make some radio broadcasts, being always careful not to lay very many political cards on the table, for he likes to keep his friends as well as his enemies guessing as to his political ideas and ideals. Possibly, of course, he has no political ideas formulated; he may rely upon developing these as the campaign progresses. All over the country, other like-minded individuals are prepar- ing to run for the presidency. Each has his own personal follow- ing of friends and relatives. This is personalismo in politics. Among some of these men there are usually several military leaders. It is obvious to all that only one person can be elected chief executive. Generally, the man who has the support of the outgoing president is the individual most likely to succeed to the presidency. This fact, of course, is evident to the other candidates who may, in consequence, form coalitions. The result xxii The Caribbean is that many political factions develop and then group and regroup. The names of the political factions in Latin American coun- tries differ, but there is a great deal of similarity nevertheless among them. Some of the party names used in different coun- tries are "liberals," "conservatives," "radicals," "republicans," "democrats," "socialists," "labor," "rightists," "leftists," "cen- tralists," "white," "brown," "red," "green." There are even " liber~al-con1servatives" and "conservative-liberals."' The use of the term "communist party" has declined somewhat in recent years because of the odium connected with it. Generally speak- ing, when the word "communist" is now used in the political sense in a Latin American country, it is employed as a deroga- tory term. Sometimes a "communist party" is a nationalist rather than a Russian-connected party. It usually advocates some sort of socialistic doctrines or principles, such as "state socialism." There are comparatively few international socialists directly connected with the U.S.S.R. in Latin America today. As the time for the election approaches, more of these indi- vidual candidates and their factions will join cooperatively with each other, stringing along the combined names of their party- factions in a hyphenated fashion. When the day of election ar- rives, a candidate's supporters generally go to the polls in an exuberant mood, occasionally intoxicated, and often carrying firearms. In previous decades elections frequently were revolu- tions and numerous people were wounded or killed in political arguments. Nowadays, the army generally maintains peace at the polling places, and elections are more likely to be relatively quiet affairs. The results of the election may or may not be known immediately after the polls close. In some instances it may be several months before a final vote is announced. When the successful candidate is elected, he prepares an in- augural address. At this time he usually reveals his platform, which heretofore has probably been clouded by rhetoric. In any case, he speaks again in glowing terms of God, Country, and Home. He may also use the occasion to suggest that the XX111 INTRODUCTION existing constitution is outmoded and that a new and better one is necessary. IX After the inauguration the president takes over the presi- dential palace from his predecessor. Generally, his family and relatives move in with him. Occasionally it even happens that the new president thus discovers some relatives whom he did not know he had! Everyone wishes to bask in his political and social glory. The spoils system now begins to function in earnest. The "ins" immediately get rid of the "outs." The "outs" may start a revolution to get back in. Sometimes a new president exiles his political enemies. Sometimes they go into hiding or go underground. Occasionally, of course, the president attempts to maintain internal political peace among all political factions. One of the first official acts of a new president is to select his cabinet. The cabinet is somewhat similar to ours, in that it is made up of ministers or heads of various departments. The minister of state or of foreign affairs is usually considered the dean or chairman of the cabinet. Since the military members often play an extremely important part in the cabinet, another early step frequently taken by the president is the reorganization of the military. He may put many of his friends into officers' positions. Still another early activity of a president may be to announce that he hopes to nationalize certain industries or to expropriate certain industrial establishments. This may, how- ever, be dangerous, and some presidents hesitate to take this step at the beginning of their administrations. Many presidents believe that one of their functions is to interest foreign bankers and businessmen in investing in their particular country. To help foreigners make such investments, the president considers it legitimate to receive a fee from the company for doing this good deed for his country. Such commissions are generally paid willingly by foreign concerns, as they usually receive a con- siderable privilege in freedom from taxes and other nuisances. xxiv The Caribbean At one time or another each Latin American country has had a dictator. Some have had many dictators. Some dictators have been worse than others. Generally speaking, dictators are ego- centric and extremely egotistical. They are convinced that they have the good of their country at heart, but they feel that the country belongs to them and whatever they do is logical and right for the country. Frequently a dictator must use force to remain in power. This in turn invites the use of force against him. Thus, full-blown revolutions may develop. Political assas- sination in Latin American countries has been a frequent and at times a fashionable cure for dictatorship. Hence, many coun- tries have had many presidents. Some have had as many as three presidents simultaneously; many have had two. Dictatorship in Latin America, considering the twenty coun- tries as a whole, has followed a cyclical pattern. About every seventeen or eighteen years there has been a peak, when more dictators flourished than usual. This cycle has been quite regular since the early part of the nineteenth century, when many of the states started off with military presidents. Military men are not necessarily greater dictators than nonmilitary. Generally speaking, a dictator is an eminently practical man; he constructs monuments and public buildings primarily that his name may be placed upon them. He does good for his country by doing the best he can for himself. He is a "do-it-now" man who doesn't wait for tomorrow. Not all the bad presidents of Latin American countries have been dictators nor have all dictators been bad for their country. Sometimes greater economic and social progress has been made under a dictator than under a nondictator. Usually, however, the nondictator president has been less picturesque and has not attracted the respect or the awe which the dictatorial type mnspires. Latin American countries have had dictators largely as a INTRODUCTION XXV political compromise between the democracy which they hoped to establish in the early part of the nineteenth century and the monarchy which they had had for several hundred years before their independence. "One-manism" in Latin America is natural. As one looks back over the historical panorama of several hun- dred years of Latin American and Iberian history, one can see only a one-man type of government. The Greeks and the Ro- mans had a one-man government in Iberia. The Germanic tribes, as invaders, brought in the one-man government idea of the chieftain. The caliph came with the invasion of the Moors. Ferdinand and Isabella, at the time of the Reconquest, estab- lished an absolute monarchy. In America, the early Spanish conquerors found the Indians under a one-man government. Negroes from Africa were used to a one-man form of govern- ment. The viceregal government set up in America by the mother countries of Spain and Portugal continued the idea of one-man government. Consequently, by the time the peoples of Latin America were ready for independence, the only political experience they had had was of one-man government. In break- ing with tradition and establishing independence they copied the democracy of their great neighbor to the north, the newly created United States. This was a complete political about-face, ex- tremely illogical from the standpoint of practical politics. After a trial of democracy, the political pendulum swung back in many countries to a form of dictatorship, sometimes mild, some- times not so mild. This was a compromise between the old one- man form of government and the new democratic ideal. Thus, political patterns for generations have followed certain trends in time and space in the Caribbean area as well as else- where in Latin America. Consequently, no one in the United States today should become disturbed by revolutions or dictators in the nations south of us. The people of these countries are simply engaged in practical politics. They think that our politi- cal methods are peculiar, just as we often think that their methods are impracticable. But they have developed workable xxvi The Caribbean governments as they developed their political habits. It is not for us to be alarmed or to become excited by their political practices. Their governments function as they want them to. They are satisfied with them. Who are we to criticize? A. CURTIS WILGUS, Director School of Inter-American Studies Part I ECONOMIC TRENDS 1L E. A. Norton: CONSERVATION PROBLEMS IN THE CARIBBEAN AREA 7THE SOIL AND WATEIR conservation problems of the Caribbean area are not small and insignificant, as might be concluded from a casual study of the map of the Western Hemi- sphere. The islands alone comprise between 60 and 70 million acres. This is no small amount of land in any part of the world in this twentieth century. Nearly 10 million acres lie at an elevation of more than 1,500 feet above sea level. The soil capable of producing food crops means life to something like 50 million people who occupy the many islands and closely re- lated continental countries. In addition, this region is looked to for annual supplies of such essential commodities as sugar by many millions more. In some parts of the Caribbean area, population already outstrips needed acreage of .productive land. At the same time, the need for improvement and protection of the soil, and for better methods of using the water available for agriculture, is urgent. In Puerto Rico, for example, with a total area of about 2 million acres, there are as many people as there are acres of land, and the population is increasing rapidly. Soil is intensively used, and three-fourths of the arable acreage requires complex soil conservation practices. There are many other such examples of mountainous, tropical lands where the people live more from The Caribbean the products of their own soil than from any other source. In many parts there is not enough good land to support the popu- lation and allow any improvement in living standards now or in the future. In such a situation the population, in its struggle for existence, will try to exhaust all natural resources. The pressure of popula- tion in the Caribbean area is already forcing cultivation of even the steepest slopes, of areas exposed to waterlogging, and of other marginal lands subject to rapid erosion and fertility decline. I think we may safely conclude at the start that in the Carib- bean area, more than in most parts of the Western Hemisphere, each acre of land counts tremendously. It is essential that we learn how to obtain the highest yields from each acre without destroying the soil's productive capability. Improved use of the resources of all parts of the region must come in the very near future if disaster is to be avoided. In fact, there are no more large land frontiers left in our hemisphere to take care of surplus populations such as are rapidly building up in the Caribbean area as well as in other parts of the hemisphere. That is, there are no more large areas of undeveloped, highly productive land. Locally there are areas, such as in the Surinam, which when cleared, drained, or irri- gated will produce abundantly; but such areas can be brought into cultivation only over a long period of time and at great cost. Generally speaking, we have reached the period of hemispheric development when we must depend upon increased per-acre yields from the land now in cultivation for most of our increased production in the future. This is especially true in the Caribbean area, where population already runs as high as one hundred to six hundred inhabitants per square mile. The problem of land scarcity, together with increasing population, makes it doubly important that all the good cultivable land be conserved, pro- tected, and improved and that there be no further delay in getting on with this job. ECONOMIC TRENDS It is true that industry is on the increase in a few places in the Caribbean area and that, gradually, more people will be absorbed into towns and factories. At the same time and be- cause of this, the problem of water is becoming acute, while the pressure on the land is not decreasing. As industry expands, there is more demand for farm products as well as for water. For successful industry there must be adequate water not only for factories, but for household use and for growing raw ma- terials for factories and food for the people. Food and water are so closely interrelated that it is impossible to separate them into two problems. Water must originate as rain and it must be held on or within the soil. The supply is relatively fixed, and already in many areas it is not enough for expansion of either agriculture or industry, let alone both. In some parts of the Caribbean area, huge dams, tunnels, and reservoirs are being employed for better control and use of the available supply. But it is estimated that the useful life of many of these structures is foreshortened because of silting. Replacement will be difficult, since effective sites are limited, especially in island countries. Altogether, the outlook for water is serious, if not critical, in several parts of the area. Nor is the outlook for productive soil one for careless optimism. Neither case is hopeless, but un- doubtedly soil and water present two of the most basic problems which the region has to face. In view of the rapidly growing populations there is no time to lose. III Like all natural resources, soils vary considerably in the quality of their productiveness. Although all but a small percentage of the agricultural products that reach the market come from areas where the soils are highly productive, consideration must be given to conservation of the areas whose soils are not so produc- The Caribbean tive. These poorer soils must be built up in fertility and stability not only for the sake of the farmers who are dependent upon them for a livelihood, but in the interests of total production for the markets. Many of the most complex and difficult problems in soil conservation are encountered in those areas that are near the margin for agricultural production. Also, in the develop- ment of new lands for agricultural production every precaution must be taken to assure a profitable and permanent enterprise before the project is begun. The conservation problems of the Caribbean area, as of other regions of the Americas, can be grouped under two broad heads: the physical loss of topsoil by erosion; and the loss of soil fer- tility. Gullying and sheet erosion of crops and pasture land in humid and semiarid areas has carried away great quantities of the original topsoil. Wind erosion in scarce-rainfall belts has removed all topsoil in many places. Wherever land has been used to grow food or fiber crops, there has been a depletion of fertility, although the loss varies according to the cropping system and other factors, such as climate and the physical properties of the soil. Leaching and removal of plant food by continuous cropping are the two principal causes of loss of soil fertility. Generally speaking, erosion and loss of fertility are the most damaging diseases of the land which are keeping down agricultural production throughout the Americas. The destruction of the natural vegetation by clearing, plow- ing, and overgrazing for more than a century, along with re- moving crop after crop without replacing the plant food, are the main practices that have caused the serious soil and water conservation problems. Nearly all the land of the Caribbean area was once heavily forested. The reduction of the organic matter content of the soil and the subsequent breakdown of soil structure set the stage for erosion. Once erosion gets started, it spreads rapidly and causes great damage. The erosion survey of Puerto Rico, made by the Soil Conserva- tion Service of the United States Department of Agriculture, revealed that erosion hazards in the island are alarming. The ECONOMIC TRENDS total land area was grouped into the various degrees of erosion according to their economic importance in the agriculture of Puerto Rico. The first group includes an area of approximately 691,000 acres--or 31 per cent of the total--where erosion progresses slowly. The second group includes areas where ero- sion is moderate, and comprises 589,000 acres, or 27 per cent of the total land. The third group, which includes the most severe and urgent problem of soil erosion, consists of 917,700 acres, or about 42 per cent of the total area of the island. It may be readily concluded that the land resources of this part of the Caribbean area have been so seriously undermined that they constitute a menace to the security of the population itself. IV The extent of this deterioration is due to a series of factors most of which are now known to be under the complete or partial control of human beings. Soil deterioration is closely related to the amount and intensity of rainfall, to topography, nature of soils, cropping systems, population pressure, land ten- ure, size of land holdings, farm credit, and, most important of all, to a lack of knowledge and of economic resources on the part of farmers. Farmers do not realize what is happening to their land. The apathy on the part of the public in general and of agricultural specialists who failed to recognize the need to conserve the soil may also have contributed in no small degree to soil losses in the tropical Caribbean area. The Department of Agriculture of the United States has taken a long step forward in conservation of soil and water resources by adopting the principle of "use of each acre within its capa- bilities and treatment of each acre according to its needs for protection and improvement." Dr. Robert M. Salter, Chief of the Soil Conservation Service, recently defined soil conservation as "proper land use, protecting the land against all forms of soil deterioration, rebuilding eroded and depleted soils, con- serving moisture for crop use, proper agricultural drainage and The Caribbean irrigation where needed, and increasing yields and farm in- come--all at the same time." Dr. Salter further stated: "It follows, I believe, that a soil conservationist is one who assists owners and operators of land to skillfully select and apply the appropriate combination of economically feasible measures, fitted to the soil of specific fields, to protect, improve, and maintain the productivity of the specific land involved. He synthesizes soil, water, and plant technology into a workable system which fits the specific pattern of soil and water resources on a farm." A considerable amount of success has already been attained in the United States soil and water conservation program. Latest detailed reports revealed that approximately 1,120,000 farmers and ranchers operating 322,400,000 acres in soil con- servation districts are active participants in this program to improve and conserve the agricultural land of the nation. The program, of course, extends to Puerto Rico and the Virgin islands, where more than 8,000 farmers operating more than half a million acres are cooperating in it. These Caribbean farmers have adopted contour farming on nearly 62,000 acres, stubble mulching on 163,000 acres, pasture improvement on 114,000 acres, and conservation woodland management on 45,000 acres. They have planted trees on 10,236 acres of severely eroded land. They have constructed more than 7,200 miles of terraces on their farms and have drained nearly 16,000 acres of land that were formerly too wet for economic crop production. In addition, they have installed irrigation on 7,500 acres of dry land and built 126 farm ponds for water storage For livestock and farm homestead supply. Through development of soil and water conservation meas- ures for Puerto Rico, it has been hoped by all who have worked on this important project that other parts of the Carib- bean area, and even other tropical areas of the world, might benefit from the results. More than ten years of research and study on the land of Puerto Rico have shown that the land- use problem is difficult because of overpopulation, and that it ECONOMIC TRENDS is complex because of physical factors. The basic soil variations are great, and they reflect the wide variations in climate, parent material, topography, and other soil forming factors. In addi- tion, there are the marks of land use and abuse, which in many places have altered soil depth, physical condition, and fertility of many soils to a degree that has largely obliterated the origi- nal variations under virgin conditions. This situation demands more research and study than would be needed if the physical factors were reasonably uniform. It places a premium on the fundamental understanding and evalua- tion of the problems of the land itself and of the social and other processes which will permit establishment of conservation land- use principles. It can be said, however, that whenever we do achieve a fundamental understanding the benefit will be great in a relatively short time, not only for the variable conditions in Puerto Rico but for vast related acreages of other tropical land. I believe this is true especially for the Caribbean area. A bulletin giving the findings and results of investigations in soil and water conservation in Puerto Rico over the past ten years is now being published by the United States Department of Agriculture. It should be useful in many other parts of the Caribbean area. Especially interesting and valuable in these investigations in Puerto Rico are the studies of problem areas and seasonal climatic conditions, ground cover in coffee culture, the use of terraces on deep and on shallow upland clay soil, mulching of cane soils, soil-conserving tropical legumes and grasses which have proved successful, and a suggested practical erosion-control rating by crops and crop sequences for use in obtaining a clearer picture of the effectiveness of improved land use and conserva- tion practices. Benefits of importance to the agriculture of Puerto Rico are becoming apparent. At Orocovis, for example. pastures com- The Caribbean posed of a mixture of tropical kudzu and native grasses, on shallow, severely eroded soil on 50 per cent slopes, provided a substantial income while conserving and building up the soil. Native scrub cattle produced almost five hundred pounds of beef yearly on such pastures. Erosion has been completely stopped, and the organic matter and nitrogen content of the soil are being rapidly built up. These pastures are very easy to establish and the forage will "keep" on the ground over long periods. On properly managed pastures, mowing and weeding were found to be unnecessary. Another example may be found in the tobacco area of the island. At Utuado a tropical kudzu mulch supplied all the nitro- gen needed to produce an excellent crop of tobacco while re- ducing soil erosion losses to about one-fourth of those from bare soil. Tobacco represents practically the only source of cash in- come for farmers in the east-central mountain region, where it is cultivated, mostly on small farms, by about twenty-two thou- sand growers. In some other parts of the Caribbean area agricultural re- search has developed the most needed practices and measures which, when applied to the land, will prevent most erosion damage. This work has been going on for some years in Mexico, in the coffee areas of Colombia, in Venezuela, and in some of the Central American countries. Already some considerable success has been achieved at the new Agricultural Research Center for French Caribbean Departments in Guadeloupe, especially in the testing of tropical legumes and grasses suitable for establish- ment of high-producing, soil-building pastures. All this work should be reviewed in detail from the point of view of the whole Caribbean area, to permit probable savings in time, effort, and costs, and to allow for getting proved practices on the land as quickly as possible. 'VI I think it is already widely recognized that the application of ECONOMIC TRENDS soil and water conservation measures and practices to the land is a most complex procedure and requires expert technical guid- ance. The treatment of each acre according to its needs for protection and improvement requires first that the character of the acre be known. The soil must be identified as to type; and it must also be determined how the soil will drain both externally and internally, what quantity of the elements of plant food it needs, the depth of the topsoil, and the susceptibility to erosion, to name only a few considerations. Knowing these, it is possible to recommend the kind of practices and measures which should be applied to the land when it is used for a definite purpose. The recommendations are so correlated that a minimum of engineering practices need be applied when a maximum of vegetative cover is used. Good soil management is essential to efficient production. It is as much a part of soil conservation as any other feature. Nearly everywhere man has been selfish in using the land, or at least he has not been aware that soils wear out so quickly. Good soil management requires that the soil structure be main- tained. If this is done continuously, erosion will be slowed down and the moisture-holding capacity of the land will be increased. A cropping plan that provides a supply of fresh organic matter along with frequent additions of plant food must be adopted. Land owners and operators will use the land properly when they become "conservation conscious." They should be shown at the outset that proper use and management of land will not only conserve it but make it produce profitably, that conserva- tion is a way of farming for efficient, abundant production on a sustained basis. Soil and water conservation demonstrations, located where farmers can see and study them, are of utmost importance in encouraging farmers to understand their own conservation problems and in getting them to accept a responsi- bility to conserve their land and water resources. However, just telling a farmer that he has an erosion problem, and showing him how the job of conserving land is done in some places, will not get the job done. The widespread application The Caribbean of sound farm conservation plans requires technical assistance. Such assistance should provide an inventory of the soil resources, point out the alternate uses and treatments of the land as shown on the soil inventory (a blueprint of how the treatments fit in various fields), and explain how the plan operates. Then, since many of the practices are new to most farmers, technical help is needed in getting the practices on the land and maintaining them in good condition. VII Farmers need an organization through which they can make their soil conservation wants known and by which they can ob- tain the technical and other assistance they need. The outstand- ing organization for soil and water conservation that has been developed is the soil conservation district. It is a local unit of government organized under law but in the complete control of the farmers themselves. The growth of this movement in the United States has been phenomenal. Nearly one-fourth of all the land in farms in the United States has been completely treated with conservation practices in fifteen years of district operations. Similar organizations in other countries are spring- ing up and show great promise. A~ll the land of Puerto Rico and the Virgin Islands is in soil conservation districts organized by the farmers since 194~6, when the Puerto Rico legislature passed a Soil Conservation Districts Law authorizing farmers to form the districts under guidance of the Insular Soil Con- servation Committee which was also created by the act. Each district has a governing board known as the Board of Supervisors. Three members are elected by the farmers, and two are appointed by the Insular Committee. All members must live within the district governed by the board of which they are members. In carrying out the work of soil conservation within a district the farmer-controlled board of supervisors may call upon local, insular, and federal agencies for such assistance-- technical or otherwise--as the agency may be in a position to provide for individual farmers. ECONOMIC TRENDS Soil conservation districts provide a means for mutual action toward common objectives. They provide a means for farmers to learn the facts about land and agriculture in their district. The supervisors represent the farmers of the various municipali- ties, thereby bringing together the best thinking in each com- munity for the betterment of all the districts. Through its soil conservation districts, the soil conservation movement in Puerto Rico is now developing a coordinated approach, and the local people have available much needed assistance for the use and maintenance of productive land. VIII The demand for agricultural products throughout our hemi- sphere in the next quarter of a century can and will likely be- come 50 per cent greater than it is today. If we are to meet this demand for food and fiber, we must depend largely on increased per-acre yields. Certainly this is true of the greater part of the Caribbean area. Increased per-acre yields call for the rapid application of soil and water conservation, good soil management, and the use of all known technological improve- ments in agriculture. This means that in all regions and coun- tries we must see to it that soil and water conservation programs are organized and speeded up at once if we are to avoid rapid decline in both our economic and social life. In most parts of the hemisphere, including the Caribbean area, we can expect the land to continue to produce adequately if we learn to treat it the conservation way and improve it as we use it. By using soil and water conservation, it will be possible to increase production from 50 to 75 per cent, if we do not delay too long the job of conditioning all the land for safe and permanent use. I believe that if the present interest in soil con- servation persists through the next two or three decades, our soil resources can be conserved and their use changed from a more or less wasteful agricultural economy to one that will be not only profitable but permanent as well. Then it will be 14 The Caribbean possible to produce the food and fiber necessary to care for the growing population, to supply its industry with needed raw ma- terials and, at the same time, to make permanent improvements in the way of rural living. The important thing just now, especially in the Caribbean area, is to get soil conservation pro- grams organized and working for the benefit of the land and the people. 2 Miron Burgin: SOME PROBLEMS OF ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT IN THE CARIBBEAN AREA THROUGHOUT Latin America the term "economic de- velopment" has in recent years become almost a household phrase. Its popularity and to some extent its significance stem in part at least from the conviction shared by many in Latin America that economic development provides a unique and effective solution of the problem of social-economic progress. The term is, of course, not new, nor indeed is the process which it describes. What is new in the current usage of the term is the emphasis upon coordination of economic activities designed to bring about the fullest possible utilization of material and human resources. It is a coordination, moreover, which is to be oriented toward goals couched in national rather than in entrepreneurial terms. The scope of economic development, its direction and em- phasis, must of necessity vary from country to country. By defi- nition, the term encompasses all sectors of the economy. But it is recognized that economic development is a function of geographic environment, of existing economic institutions, and of the social-cultural pattern of life in the area. So, in one country economic development may well manifest itself in strong emphasis upon industrialization, while elsewhere the principal developmental activities may be directed to some other sector The Caribbean of the economy. Again, the scope of economic development changes in time, for it is conditioned partly by the accidental character of past economic growth, and partly also by variations in the developmental potential among the individual sectors of the economy. This generalization is especially valid with respect to Latin America, where national economic structures have al- ready attained a considerable degree of complexity and where future economic development cannot readily disregard, save at a considerable cost, institutions that are deeply imbedded in and form an integral part of the contemporary pattern of eco- nomic and social life. It at the same time permits an appropriate phasing of economic development in accordance with the area's human and material resources, its short-run requirements and long-range possibilities. Planning or allocation of resources in time as well as in space would appear to be an essential element of economic develop- ment. It relates to the availability of resources, to the manner and order in which they are to be utilized, and, indeed, to the very process of economic growth. It stems from the circum- stances that resources are not unlimited and that some combina- tions of these resources are more productive than others. Within any given area the volume of natural resources is relatively stable and limited, although the economic use of these resources is subject to change in response to changes in industrial technology. It is obvious that knowledge of the economic potential of these resources is a prerequisite of effective planning for economic development, since only under this condition can competition for available labor and capital be given full play. Also limited, though in a somewhat different way, is the sup- ply of labor and capital. Under conditions of reasonably full employment economic development would by definition require a transfer of labor from one area of economic activity to another. Such shifts need not, however, be costly. Indeed, in countries ECONOMIC TRENDS where there exists disguised unemployment a shift of labor oc- casioned by the opening up of new areas of economic activity may well result in a net increase in productivity and quite pos- sibly in total production in the areas from which labor was drawn. According to a definition formulated by a group of economists in the United Nations, disguised unemployment or underem- ployment relates to individuals "who work for their own account and are so numerous in relation to the resources with which they work, that if a number of them left their occupations to work in other economic activities, total production of the sector in which they were formerly engaged would not be diminished, even though no important reorganization or any appreciable substitution of investment were effected therein." In a number of areas in the Caribbean region the volume of disguised unem- ployment is considerable. This unemployment may be due partly to overpopulation, partly to the circumstance that economic opportunities are in general rather limited, and partly also to traditional and institutional factors which inhibit mobility of the population. The problem is not so much one of choosing be- tween two profitable methods of utilizing labor, but rather one of creating forms of economic development capable of absorbing labor whose present productivity is extremely marginal. It is particularly serious in countries where the rate of population growth is rather high, as is the case for example in El Salvador, Costa Rica, Guatemala, Nicaragua, and Honduras. In such areas the rate of economic development must exceed the rate of population growth, if disguised unemployment is to be elimi- nated or substantially reduced. One additional point may well be considered in connection with the problem of supply of labor. In certain areas and at certain stages of economic development technical skill is indis- pensable. Indeed, shortage of skilled labor may well become the crucial limiting factor of all economic development. For this reason the opening up of new areas of economic activity capable of absorbing surplus labor must be accompanied, and The Caribbean at times preceded, by efforts to increase the supply of skilled and semiskilled labor. This is not always an easy task, especially in countries where training facilities are nonexistent or cannot be easily maintained in view of the narrowness of the demand for specific skills. The problem will be less urgent and more easy to solve in the industrially more advanced countries, such as Mexico, and it will be more complex in countries where the industrial sector is small and in its early stages of development, and where also the technological level of agricultural activities still leaves a good deal to be desired. In the latter case interna- tional cooperation such as is exemplified by the Agricultural Institute at Turrialba, Costa Rica, offers an effective solution. III The problem of utilization of capital resources is considerably more complex than that of labor or national resources. In present circumstances capital is the limiting factor in the economic de- velopment of the Caribbean area. The limitation relates not only to present availabilities of investment capital, but also and perhaps more significantly to the capacity of most of the Carib- bean economies to channel an adequate proportion of current production into investment. Certain aspects of the problem merit special consideration in the context of this paper. As capital is scarce in relation to de- velopmental needs and opportunities, its allocation among claim- ant activities becomes a task of not inconsiderable complexity. In a competitive market such allocation can, of course, be left entirely to the play of economic forces. This course, however, sound though it may be, may not always be practicable. It is certainly not practicable in those sectors of the economy where government and public capital have found it necessary or advis- able to play an increasingly important and at times a decisive role. At any rate, the direction of the flow of investment capital can be and often is to a considerable extent determined either directly or indirectly by public authorities. ECONOMIC TRENDS Whatever the mechanism by which investment capital is allo- cated among the competing claims, the problem of formulating criteria for such an allocation can hardly be avoided. If em- phasis were to be placed upon the production of goods for in- ternal consumption, the pattern of capital investment would differ markedly from that which would correspond to a decision to promote the growth of production for export. Again, long- range development presents a pattern of demand for capital that differs significantly from a demand that would be brought forth by economic development designed to meet current consumption needs of the population. To be sure, these considerations need not be mutually exclusive; indeed, they may well be comple- mentary. Expansion of production of consumers' goods may well depend upon the existence of an appropriate economic environ- ment, the creation of which requires more or less substantial long-term investments. Or, to call attention to another aspect of the problem, expansion of exports may be necessary in order that the domestic sector of the economy can be provided with the capital goods that must be procured from abroad. Such a complement does not, however, eliminate the problem. On the contrary, it makes the problem more complex. Precisely because investment capital is scarce in relation to other resources as well as to developmental requirements, eco- nomic development must encompass areas where returns are direct and immediate, as well as those where returns either are indirect or can be realized only after a lapse of time. The con- struction of a hydroelectric plant with a productive capacity that anticipates future demand, and indeed stimulates such a demand, involves at least temporary immobilization of some capital resources. Expansion of the educational system, whether for the purpose of reducing illiteracy or for the purpose of in- creasing the supply of skilled labor and technicians, calls for capital expenditures from which no direct returns can or need be expected. It is in this context that the problem of balancing developmental opportunities and requirements must be placed, in the forefront of economic policy in underdeveloped areas. The Caribbean The question of effective utilization of natural and capital resources and, therefore, of the cost of economic development, is closely related to the existence or creation of national markets. It is generally agreed among observers of the Latin American economic scene that narrowness of national markets in Latin America has in the past been a serious obstacle to the growth and development of industrial enterprises capable of surviving foreign competition. The narrowness of the national market relates less to the size of the country's population than to its income. In many of the countries in the Caribbean region only a relatively small proportion of the population can boast an effective market large enough to support industries in which costs of production are closely related to volume of output. A manufacturing plant whose productive capacity must of neces- sity be considerably in excess of domestic demand for some time to come, and whose actual output as determined by the market must support an inordinately large overhead cost, is a melancholy sight--a sight that is altogether too common on the Latin American economic landscape. At best, it involves the freezing for an indefinite period of scarce resources, especially capital. At worst, it involves misuse or even waste of capital resources and, under conditions of reasonably full employment, of labor resources as well. The problem of markets in underdeveloped countries is in a very real sense closely related to levels of living. In general, present levels of living are so low that even a relatively modest improvement is likely to expand the domestic market rather con- siderably, since such an improvement would be translated almost entirely into a demand for necessities. But improvement in levels of living cannot be attained except through increased productivity or through reduction in the cost of the commodities which the bulk of the population consumes or is likely to consume. The problem of national markets will be less difficult to solve in countries with relatively large populations. In Mexico, for ECONOMIC TRENDS example, the potential market appears to be sufficiently broad to permit the establishment of mass-production manufacturing plants of optimum size. Even in Colombia, Venezuela, and Cuba one can look forward to the eventual development of domestic markets for a number of consumer goods that would justify fairly heavy industrial investments. In Central America, on the other hand, the limits to the expansion of domestic mar- kets are relatively low. In El Salvador, for example, with a population of over 2 million, only about 150 thousand family units out of a total of 450 thousand earn more than $36 per month. Even a sizable improvement in family incomes would not create an adequate national market for many mass-produced commodities. These considerations have even greater validity for countries such as Costa Rica, with a population of less than 1 million, or Honduras, with a population of a little over 1.5 million. The vicious circle of mutual dependence between economic development and growth of national markets can be at least partly broken with the resources at the disposal of these countries. One point of attack upon the problem would appear to be re- duction in costs of production and distribution of the commodi- ties offered for domestic consumption. Such a reduction can be secured through improvement in the economic environment in which production and distribution take place. Among the most significant components of such an economic environment would be adequate transportation, and abundance of power at reason- able prices. The need for improvement of transportation facilities, espe- cially highways, has been recognized for some time now through- out the Caribbean region. In the last decade or so considerable progress has been made with assistance from the United States in the construction of the Pan-American Highway, which when completed will link the countries of Central America and The Caribbean Mexico. But of importance equal with that of the great trunk highway are feeder highways reaching into the interior of the countries. For it is there, outside the capital cities and other large industrial centers, that the market potential is greatest and most capable of rapid growth, at least in the early stages of expansion. It is not possible or even appropriate in this paper to indicate what should be the transportation network for each country. It would require much more direct and intimate acquaintance with the economy of El Salvador than I can claim, to say whether the country's network of over 3,000 kilometers of high- ways and earth roads is adequate or not. Certainly the system of roads in El Salvador is at present considerably superior to that of ten or fifteen years ago, and similar improvements may be noted in Mexico, Guatemala, Honduras, Nicaragua, and Co- lombia. However, the principal criterion of the adequacy of the transportation system is not so much the density of highways or road mileage, but rather the capacity of the network to integrate all the potentially important areas of economic activity into the national market. To the extent that improvement in the transportation system reduces the cost of distribution and, therefore, the ultimate price of the commodity to the consumer, it increases the purchas- ing power of the population. This in turn broadens the market base for industrial expansion and permits establishment of manu- facturing plants in which the scale of production is in closer accord with norms prevalent in competing plants abroad. The ultimate purpose of capital investment in transportation con- sists, therefore, not only in the reduction of distribution costs, but in a decline of production costs as well. VI The question of supply of power lies close to the center of economic development policy and planning. The present supply of electric power in the various countries of the area is admit- tedly insufficient to support the kind of economic development ECONOMIC TRENDS which the available natural and material resources permit. Moreover, the cost of electric power is frequently rather high. Exploration of new sources of power and their exploitation in- volves both long-range planning and long-term investment of considerable size. Here, too, expansion of power production facilities calls for investment of resources that not only meets current demand but that anticipates future needs. At the same time the cost of electric power to consumers, especially industrial consumers, must be sufficiently low to permit intensive mechani- zation of production of manufactured goods. In this respect most of the countries of the Caribbean region have yet a long way to travel, in spite of truly remarkable advances in the post- World War II period. The experience of certain Central Ameri- can countries is rather instructive. Expansion plans, involving principally completion of projects of the Lempa Electrification Commission in El Salvador and of the National Institute of Electricity in Costa Rica, envisage an increase by 1954 in the total capacity of these two countries of about 40,000 kilowatts. Work under way in Nicaragua and Guatemala will add 14,500 kilowatts by 1955. These increases, however, will be just about sufficient to meet the demand projected for these countries by 1955, and there will be left little or nothing of unused capacity to meet requirements of continuing economic development. It seems clear that in these countries plans must be formulated in the very near future for further expansion of production of electric energy. It will be noted that development of both electric power and transportation facilities calls for long-term capital investments of considerable size. Moreover, this investment must not only respond to current requirements but must also anticipate future needs. Part of the capital allocated to construction of highways and electric power facilities cannot be expected to yield returns in terms of improved levels of living until some time in the future. Indeed, capital used for highway construction cannot be amortized except indirectly, through expansion of economic activities and integration of the national economy. In either The Caribbean case there arises the issue of determining the proportions of avail- able capital resources which within a given period should be allocated for these long-term investments without denying to other sectors of the economy their share of these resources. VII Another area in which considerable progress can be made toward the goal of increasing the absorptive capacity of the domestic market is improvement of productivity in agricultural industries. Inculcation of more productive methods of cultiva- tion, utilization of more effective equipment and implements, installation of storage facilities, and adoption of appropriate marketing methods--all such measures can be counted upon to bring about an improvement in levels of living within a relatively short time. Moreover, in view of the fact that a very large proportion of the population in the Caribbean area derives its livelihood from agriculture, the benefits derived from improved productivity in agriculture are likely to be widely distributed and within a relatively short period. In the early stages of economic development concentration upon agriculture as one of the crucial areas, of at least equal importance with manufacturing, appears to be justified on several grounds. To begin with, capital resources required to bring about an increase in productivity need not be large in relation to returns. Then, too, the investment unit is relatively small, and a fairly large proportion of such investments can be amortized within a relatively short period. Secondly, expanded agricultural production can most readily make full use of investment in the improvement of economic environment, such as transportation. This would hold true of agricultural production destined for either domestic consumption or the foreign market. And to the extent that this does hold true the period of amortization of long- term public investments is shortened. Thirdly, because of the breadth of the agricultural sector in the Caribbean economies, savings effected in agriculture through increased productivity ECONOMIC TRENDS are likely to be distributed rather easily throughout the non- agricultural population. Here, too, reduction in the cost of agricultural commodities can most readily be translated into higher levels of living for the urban population, which is in turn the more immediate market for manufactured goods. Finally, increase in productivity in the agricultural export industries would contribute markedly toward the solution of the problem of capital accumulation as well as the problem of financing purchase of capital goods that must be imported from abroad. The latter consideration is of particular importance, since most of the machinery and equipment needed for the development of manufacturing industries cannot as a rule be produced locally, but must be paid for with foreign exchange, and since also in most countries of the Caribbean region agricultural commodities form the bulk of exports. In recent years this problem may not have been a pressing one in view of the rise in prices of coffee and other export commodities. But even if present terms of trade remain unchanged, additional supplies of foreign exchange de- rived from increased productivity would broaden the horizons and accelerate the tempo of economic development. ~VIII Some broad conclusions may now be in order. It may per- haps be considered a commonplace to say that all economic de- velopment is uneven. But the statement that unevenness is an essential and, indeed, indispensable element even of planned development will bear repetition. The problem in planning eco- nomic development is not, therefore, to eliminate unevenness and to insure simultaneous and uniform rate of growth in all the sectors of the national economy. It is rather a problem of planning or controlling the degree of unevenness. Such plan- ning must be designed to insure a selection of developmental goals that will within a given period maximize production for immediate use. In most underdeveloped countries the limiting factor in eco- The Caribbean nomic development is scarcity of investment capital. It is with respect to this factor that planned unevenness appears to be of the greatest moment. Long-term investment must not be too large in relation to the current productive capacity of the econ- omy, or the investment will result in waste through immobiliza- tion of capital. On the other hand, long-term investment in a given sector of the economy must be sufficiently large to provide a proper stimulus for economic activities in other sectors. Since capital is scarce and since also a part of available capital resources must remain permanently immobilized as long-term anticipatory investment, economic development policy must put special emphasis upon expansion of activities which promise immediate returns to the economy. In many countries agricul- ture would appear to offer such opportunities; but it is not at all difficult to visualize industrial activities in which relatively small investments, whether in the form of modern machinery and equipment or in the form of new techniques, would result in more than proportionate increments to national income. Theoretically at least, for each economy a specific pattern of investment can be devised which would insure a balance between long-range and short-term investment and which would thereby be likely to maximize production for a given period. To identify the various elements that enter this balance is the task of the scholar. To construct this balance in relation to a given eco- nomic environment is a responsibility which falls upon the shoulders of the policy maker. The economic validity of the balance between long- and short-term investments is itself subject to revision in response to changes within the economy and abroad. This means that plan- ning of economic development must be subject to continuous re-examination, and that the planning period must be short and the scope of developmental plans relatively narrow. Gilberto Loyo and Ratil Ortiz Mena: PROBLEMS OF UNDERDEVELOPED AREAS IN THE CARIBBEAN THE OBJECTIVE toward which the economic policy of the so-called underdeveloped countries seems to be directed is that of economic development. But before attempting any considera- tion of the very interesting subjects related to economic develop- ment, we might well try to explain what is the meaning of this term so widely used nowadays. Economic development does not constitute a goal in itself. That is, countries are not trying to advance their economy only for the purpose of having a greater number of industries, better communication and transportation systems, and so forth, but for the sake of the achievement of certain particular aims. In objectives in all aspects of national life, among which can be this sense, economic development is a way to attain fundamental pointed out such achievements as a rising standard of living for the population, economic independence (or at least diminish- ing dependence on foreign areas), and the adequate use of all national resources in the national interest. Therefore, if the above aims constitute the purpose of economic development, it should only be evaluated, according to our way of thinking, by the magnitude of the special results obtained. The Caribbean An attempted definition of economic development, embody- ing the aims as well as the means to accomplish them, is as follows: National economic development is the sustained and persistent process of investments--not necessarily in continuous growth--which, allowing wide and intensive application of modern technology to the production of goods and services of a country and increasing the capital endowment per employable worker, will make the country's productivity rise and conse- quently increase the income, consumption, and savings of the majority of the population, and which at the same time will maintain the flow of capital essential to the economic develop- ment itself. It is easy to deduce from the above definition that economic development can be considered a function of capital accumula- tion, since the most important way to accomplish it is through the increment of capital per person. In other words, the accumu- lation of capital as the essential characteristic of the system is the road to economic development, which as mentioned before can at the same time be conceived as a way to achieve certain foreseen objectives. Now, at the risk of falling into academism and generalization, we shall enunciate the principal characteristics which are at- tributed to the economic structure of countries insufficiently developed. It is commonly affirmed that an underdeveloped economy is characterized by the following factors: 1. A low capitalization 2. A low productivity 3. A low per capital income level, as a consequence of the low productivity prevailing in economic activities; and a very deficient income distribution 1 Juli~n Alienes Urosa, "Tesis sobre el desarrollo econ6mico de Cuba," El Trimestre Econdmico, XIX, No. 1 (Mexico, 1952). ECONOMIC TRENDS 4~. The existence of great unfulfilled primary needs 5. A high percentage of the economically active population engaged in primary activities (agriculture, hunting, fishing, forestry ) 6. The existence of the well-known phenomenon of unemploy- ment, especially in agriculture 7. A deficient communication and transportation system caused by having a great number of areas excluded from the exchange economy and by stimulating subsistence pro- duction and multicellular economies 8. The formation of "inframonopolies" in the production field and of monopolies of middlemen 9. The existence of an unfavorable interchange in the field of international trade. As mentioned above, economic development could be con- sidered as a function of capital formation, which is the same as saying that investments are required in order to initiate a process of economic development. "Since the lack of capital is one of the basic characteristics of an underdeveloped country, it could be thought that an investment is the starting point of such a process, generally at a higher sum than that being ob- tained. Here is where vicious circles appear common to the underdeveloped countries: a country is poor because it has not been developed; it has not been developed because of lack of capital; it lacks capital because it does not save; and it does not save because it is poor. This vicious circle is broken by an additional investment. But this investment has to be financed from somewhere. If it is from the country itself, it has to be through a better use of existing savings or capital already estab- lished, if not through foreign sources."2 It is undoubtedly true that countries economically weak are determined to develop their industrialized economy in order to attain the above objectives. It is still too premature to pretend 2 Nacional Financiera, Dicima Octava Asarnblea General Ordinaria de Accionistas (Mexico, 1952). The Caribbean to estimate the results in comparison with the efforts made, since the process of economic development covers several gener- ations. Therefore, the central theme of this summary consists in outlining what are the most important problems faced by Latin America and what are the factors obstructing the rapid evolution of its economy. III To a greater or lesser degree it can be said that Mexico and the nations of Central America and the Caribbean area have the characteristics attributed to underdeveloped economies. Ac- tually, in all of them the income level is low, and income is unevenly distributed. The structure of occupations indicates a strong dependency on primary activities, where the higher per- centage of the economically active population is concentrated. The character of foreign trade is that of so-called colonial countries; that is, their exports consist principally of raw ma- terials and these are little diversified; on the other hand, their imports are very diversified, causing an unfavorable interchange relation. According to data obtained through research carried on by the United Nations, in 1939 the per capital income in various countries of the area now being discussed had the following totals: El Salvador, $45; Guatemala, $48; Haiti, $50; Domini- can Republic, $51; Mexico, $61; Cuba, $98. By 1947 the following changes had taken place: El Salvador, $87 (gross national product); Guatemala, $128 (gross national product); Haiti, $25; Dominican Republic, $86; Mexico, $190; and Cuba, $341. These figures are considerably lower than those for industrialized countries, and consequently Cuba is the best situated in this group. The changes which occurred between the years specified can give only an approximate idea of the course followed by eco- nomic evolution in each of the countries mentioned. The real income and the population are the two elements integrating ECONOMIC TRENDS what is known as the "economic development rate," which is the criterion for the economic development. That is, as long as the increase of the real income exceeded the population in- crement in a given period, a development occurred whose magni- tude derives from the relation between the percentage of the real income increment and the population increment. However, not all income increase can be attributed to the development itself, which comes from a persistent flow of investments accord- ing to the definition we employ from the beginning, but may be due to random factors, such as the improvement in prices of exported products and a good harvest, factors generically known as "economic improvement" and not as "economic de- velopment." Data on the per capital income of the countries given above are insufficient to determine the magnitude of the development rate. Nevertheless, with the exception of one country, all figures indicate considerable increases during the period. These in- creases should be expressed in actual terms as deflationary increases. However, while there seems to have been an improve- ment in the income levels of the countries listed, the uneven income distribution is a phenomenon which has become greater in the last few years. In Mexico, for instance, salaries and wages in 1939 reached 30.5 per cent of the national income, whereas profits were 26.1 per cent; in 1950, salaries and wages decreased to 23.8 per cent of the national income, while profits increased to 41.4 per cent. Even without complete information it can be said that a similar trend exists in all the countries mentioned. The deficient income distribution lessens the purchasing power of great population groups, causing a reduction of the domestic trade toward which the national production is directed. Further- more, the high resources available from profits are not utilized in productive investments but are used in the acquisition of superfluous goods, which results in a lack of balance in national demand and consequent loss of currency. Factors which are characteristic of insufficiently developed economies are strongly noted in regard to the national income The Caribbean composition as well as to the occupational structure. In Mexico, for instance, commerce and finances occupy first place in the national income composition, but these are representative of only 10 per cent of the economically active population. The manufacturing industry contributes about 25 per cent of the income and occupies only 12 per cent of the active population, whereas the primary activity of agriculture contributes 20 per cent of the income and represents 61 per cent of the active population. This shows the low productivity of the latter and the low income level of persons depending on primary activities. In Guatemala, agriculture represents 75 per cent of the eco- nomically active population and produces 57 per cent of the national income. In Honduras, agriculture, which absorbs 83.4 per cent of the active population, including nonpaid household members (or 76.4 per cent excluding the latter), produces 55.0 per cent of the national income. Industry occupies 6.0 per cent of the population and produces 8.8 per cent of the income, while commerce occupies 2.0 per cent and contributes 14.4 per cent of the income; other activities follow in declining order. Among the countries comprising the Caribbean area, only Mexico has attained a certain degree of industrial development. This has permitted the diversification of its production in this field, including goods for immediate consumption as well as raw materials and items for durable consumption, and some other kinds of goods. In the other countries, industry has the characteristics of the underdeveloped nations. In Cuba, how- ever, the sugar industry contributes 30 per cent of the national income. But on the other hand, great quantities of this product are assigned to the foreign market. Cuban economy, therefore, depends on this product and on the foreign market. Light industries producing consumer goods characterize back- ward countries. There are industries in Guatemala producing foods, beverages, tobacco, and some textiles, but even in these lines it is necessary to resort to importations to fulfill consumer demand, especially of foods. On the other hand, the increase of industrial production in the last few years has tended to be ECONOMIC TRENDS lower than the increment of per capital income, which indicates that industry has lost ground in its contribution to the total in- come of the country. In Honduras, 99 per cent of the so-called industrial establishments are actually manual labor establish- ments and employ less than five workers. They lack machinery, and their working methods are backward, for they have at their disposal only hand tools. But while manual labor establishments reach such a high proportion, the investments in them come only to 9.8 per cent of the total. The remaining 90.2 per cent of such investments corresponds to the actual industrial estab- lishments, which numerically hardly reach 1 per cent of the total. The existing industries in this country are: foods (sugar, flour, vegetable shortening, and oils), beer, wearing apparel (shirts and shoes), soap, candles, chemical products, matches, and pharmaceutical products. There is some mining. Properly speak- ing, there is no textile industry. As far as power and fuels are concerned, firewood represents 99 per cent of the domestic con- sumption and 20 per cent of the fuel used for industry. Similar situations prevail in almost all the remaining countries of the Caribbean area. In the field of international trade, exports are composed of a few products originating from primary and extractive activi- ties (including Mexico). In Guatemala, as well as in El Salvador and several other countries, the principal exported product is coffee. In Honduras, banana exports of the United Fruit Com- pany come to 70 per cent of the total export value, coffee reaches 10 per cent, and wood is the other exported item. The export total reaches 39 per cent of national production. In Cuba, sugar constitutes the basic export item. The course fol- lowed by economic activity in this country is subject to the sugar production cycle. Products originating from these countries flow chiefly to a single market--the United States. Competition among themselves is subject to production and exportation quotas and set prices, which make still more acute the unfavorable interchange relations. Exports lack diversification in Mexico also. In 1950 and 1951 The Caribbean fifteen products represented 74 per cent and 69 per cent, re- spectively, of the total export value. Of these products, four were minerals (metallic and concentrated lead, metallic and concentrated zinc, metallic and concentrated copper, and ster- ling silver), amounting to 25.8 per cent of the 1951 exports; four were vegetable products (peeled coffee beans, cotton plants, sisal hemp, and forage), reaching 30.7 per cent; two were animal products (fresh or frozen fish and shrimp), representing 4.7 per cent; two were semimanufactured products (yarns, sisal threads and cords, and stringing thread), amounting to 1.6 per cent. Petroleum reached 3.9 per cent, and only one manu- factured product, cotton materials, had some importance in regard to exports, since it came to 2.1 per cent of the total value. IV In broad terms, the most important problems faced by the Caribbean area countries in the development of their industries are: scarcity of capital; lack of raw materials; high prices; low productivity; technical backwardness; lack of trained workers; deplorable living conditions of laborers which affect their health and their working capacity; deficiencies in the transportation systems; scanty development of the basic industries, such as power and fuels; and a limited market. In Mexico it has been possible to achieve a higher degree of industrial development in comparison with other Latin Ameri- can countries because of the agrarian reformation, a consequence of the democratic-bourgeois Revolution of 1910, and because of the strong public works policy and the measures taken for in- dustrial development, which have enlarged the domestic market. But the increasingly uneven income distribution and the rising inflation seriously threaten to obstruct possibilities for new ad- vances. In almost all countries of the Caribbean area an agrarian reformation, prerequisite to the economic development, has not taken place, and the economic structure has definite semifeudal ECONOMIC TRENDS and semicolonial characteristics. The development of the do- mestic market, toward which national production should be directed (meaning that industrial development should be indig- enous), represents one of the biggest problems in their eco- nomic evolution. Most countries have a wide potential market among the rural population which cannot be incorporated in the exchange economy unless an agrarian reformation takes place. There is an urgent need in all these countries to obtain a better distribution of the national income. But we do not think that a redistribution of the income would by itself be sufficient for the attainment of social welfare, since the per capital income figure is very low. The existence of nonfulfilled primary needs in the population will be gradually resolved only through con- siderable increases in national production. However, it is neces- sary to halt the intensification of the uneven income distribution and, whenever possible, to redistribute it. What is now important is to obtain an increase not in the total income but rather in individual income in order to guar- antee a growing effective demand which will insure an economic activity level and greater social welfare. The better utilization of available financial resources (through channelization toward productive activities and through strict selection of imports, whose volume should be in accordance with the purchasing capacity of the countries), a policy of industrial protection in all its forms, the intelligent handling of fiscal policy, and the diversification of markets constitute the principal tools for an attack on the economic development problems of these underdeveloped countries. 4 Frank K. Bell: TRANSPORTATION IN THE CARIBBEAN IT IS AN HONOR for me to be afforded again the opportunity to address the annual Caribbean conference. My company, with so many interests in the Caribbean, is profoundly interested in the decision of the University of Florida to have a sustained program aimed at encouraging attention to the economic, cul- tural, and educational aspects of the Caribbean area. The coun- tries of the Caribbean represent the majority of the most intimate neighbors of the United States, their strategic position assuring them always a place of principal importance to our country. The University is to be congratulated on its choice. We who are attending this conference have come together because we have sincere common interests in the progress of the Caribbean. Some of us are primarily concerned with cultural patterns there, some with philosophical and sociological designs, but all of us must admit that the paramount immediate concern is the bettering of that area's economy. We are agreed, I believe, that there is a promising future for the Caribbean, one that will be economically sound and that will bring with it a firm security for that region's people. Our confidence is founded in the ac- knowledged existence of rich plantations, great unexploited mineral wealth, untapped forest products, areas of unfathomable hydroelectric and agricultural promise, and a vast sea which in itself can yield economic well-being. But the chronic frustration ECONOMIC TRENDS that often impedes our dreams for the Caribbean is in our in- ability thus far to bring all these dreams to the fruition they deserve. Once they achieve reality, we are aware that the richest market in the world lies waiting. The Caribbean area is the nearest subtropical region to the United States, which country is the logical outlet for the area's natural products. That it- not always is the outlet may be at- tributed to the fact that real Caribbean products are often so inefficiently marketed as to be uncompetitive, and that many of the area's potential products have not been able to reach the stage of exploitation. Now, it is my contention that effective transportation is not only indispensable to the solution of these problems but may well be the first and most important objective. It is everywhere evident in the pages of history that no nation has ever reached advanced development without adequate means of moving its goods and peoples. Yet when we speak of de- velopment of the Caribbean countries, we do not often consider simultaneously the improvement of transportation, which I be- lieve is the first essential to that development. Transportation is, and always has been, a part of production. When it is improved, run with foresight, planned and operated with business acumen, it is an efficient and vital factor in production. When transporta- tion is inefficient or nonexistent, except in primitive forms, the competitive economic development of an area is stifled. The latter condition is the diagnosis of the economic somnolence that once afflicted so many of the Caribbean countries. Yet with the rapid strides toward improvement in recent years, it seems that the patient is out of danger. We can hope that he will be swing- ing both arms as he relishes the loss of the affliction, and that do-or-die he is determined as never before to make himself felt in this world. The title of my paper, "Transportation in the Caribbean," is perhaps too brief ; possibly it could better have been "Trans- portation-the Development of Trade and Travel in the Carib- The Caribbean bean." There is, of course, no transportation without things and people. It is my desire in this talk to expand the conven- tional constrictions of transportation-roads, rail, air, and port facilities--and to treat this subject as the integral unit that it is and must be in the economy of an area. A few days ago I was watching with interest the adroit ma- nipulation of dugouts by the Djuka Negroes in the jungles of Dutch Guiana. This method of transportation, which goes back to cave-man days, is one extreme of the breadth of transporta- tion used in the Caribbean, the other being the modern planes traveling with a speed which brings the whole area within a few hours of any part of the North American continent. To the movement of people must be attributed the primary motive for transportation; for instance, the development of the raft and the dugout canoe, which together served as the first means of transportation by water. But a large share of the ex- pansion of transportation must be laid at the door of the essential need of moving the world's products. The Caribbean area is no exception to this rule, where, in addition to the movement of native goods associated with the tropics, basic natural resources available in large supply have brought transportation services beyond normal demand. The development of bauxite in the Guianas, and now in Jamaica and in other places in the area, has been more respon- sible than any other one resource for the expansion of transporta- tion in the Caribbean. The vessels necessary to transport the bauxite to the United States and Canada have been available to carry southbound cargoes, and this circumstance has had its effect on practically every phase of the area's economic life. First there was a need, in order to obtain any part of the southbound traffic competitively, to service practically the entire area en route to the mines. As trade expanded from the initial service to a handful of ports in the Caribbean, shipping facilities were increased to the point where the bauxite vessels now visit over sixty ports on their southbound itineraries. Only a com- ECONOMIC TRENDS paratively few ships would be required to transport the bauxite without calls elsewhere, but in order to meet the cargo demands en route to the mines, there are now available to the Caribbean area for cargo transportation over one hundred vessels which would not be there if there was no bauxite in the area. Then, in order to assure the support of the importers who are invariably also exporters, some northbound service is necessary, which is supplied by the bauxite carriers as cargo is offered. If the freight patrons of a shipping line and the countries a line serves can be furnished passenger service, there is increased probability of support. As a result, the lines handling bauxite arrange passenger accommodation on most of their vessels. In the case of the Alcoa Steamship Company, special vessels are commissioned to offer the highest type of service to encourage tourism. I use bauxite as an illustration because it is a product with which I am intimately familiar. Yet the same type of develop- ment has resulted from the movement of oil, sugar, bananas, and other products. The by-products of this type of transportation development are as important, if not more important, to the economy of the Caribbean area as the transportation itself. Each year many millions of United States dollars are expended on shore installations, wages, services, taxes, and local products. The recent activity in connection with the iron deposits in Vene- zuela will undoubtedly contribute considerably to the transporta- tion facilities in the area. That semiprimitive region that fans out above the Orinoco delta will enjoy much of the same kind of development beyond the primary design of opening its unrivaled ore deposits to the world's industrial markets. It is assumed as a first condition that many, many months are necessary for preparing avenues of transportation that will be the master key to the realization of these rich resources. In the latest dispatches from the area of Ciudad Bolivar, we hear of tremendous projects for river- dredging, dock facilities, tracks for ore-cars, and expressways to The Caribbean that previously almost unknown area which so long concealed an entire mountain of iron ore: Cerro Bolivar. I have used bauxite as an example of how a product can be responsible for development of transportation. I believe it will be of interest to include a little that is more specific concerning my company in connection with bauxite, for I feel that the Aluminum Company of America, through its subsidiary Alcoa Steamship Company, offers an example of successful and wide- spread economic development through transportation. There is no need to emphasize the singular and dominant role that transportation has played in making available to the aluminum industry in the United States and Canada the superior resources of bauxite ore in Surinam and British Guiana. It is too ele- mentary to say that the problem of transporting the ore to North America was merely one of hiring or building a fleet to do the job. In reality, the task was big enough to give birth to what is now one of the largest shipping companies in the United States, and after thirty years of service, which my company celebrates this year, we must still face and meet successfully every day new problems which transportation imposes upon a product that is to be marketed competitively. Apart from the fact that we have achieved the original pur- pose of providing a steady flow of supply for the ever-broadening aluminum industry in the United States, this one transportation company alone has been responsible for ramifications that are felt far beyond Surinam and into the entire Caribbean. You have but to visit Surinam for a few hours to grasp how the overtones of this single-purpose transportation job have re- sounded in the national life of a country. I say single-purpose, which the transportation of ore ostensibly is, but it became much more than that. Rivers existed, which made entry into the bauxite lands of the interior possible. But such rivers, with shifting, uncertain bottoms, following courses like the spiral ECONOMIC TRENDS binding of a book. And from the time the first steamer began to follow this tortuous route until this very moment, there has been and still is going on a constant study and investment towards an improvement in the method of transportation. The impact of this continuous improvement has been felt by Suri- nam's economy with the expenditure of millions of dollars, the employmentt of millions of man-hours, and the compounding of national awareness of resources due to a constant increase an their availability. If you visit the Moengo mines, ninety miles up the Comme- wijne and Cottica rivers, you will see the kind of things this trans- portation is responsible for in Dutch Guiana. A whole way of life unlike anything else in Surinam has grown up in what was ~nce a little native village. The hundreds of native employees have taken to neat, clean streets, clubs, private homes, well- itocked grocery stores, and a motion-picture theater. III One problem in transportation within the Caribbean area remains, minor as it may be in relation to the transportation -equirements as a whole; it is the need for inexpensive but de- ~endable passenger and freight service between the islands. For the people of low income, there remains the now rather anti- Juated and undesirable passage by schooner. The high operating :0sts of ships and planes, together with other operating difficulties, nake it impracticable to offer the low-priced transportation servicee which used to be available years ago. Up to the start of World War II, the once thriving schooner .rade was slowly giving way to more modern methods. During .he war, when all transportation was on a priority basis, only limited steamer service was allocated to the Caribbean, and for :he first time the schooners available were put under government >ool control, the result being that except between one or two nain points in the area, they became the mainstay for the move- nent of essential cargo requirements between the islands. Since The Caribbean the war much of the control of schooner movement has been retained. It is hoped that schooners will continue to hold their position, furnishing at least the bare essentials of transportation for the lower-incomed, until such time as the economic standards of the people and local trade development can advance suf- ficiently to provide enough freight and tourist traffic to warrant the improvement of the presently limited facilities offered by transportation which originates outside the area. IV Without the stimulus of tourism, the natural movement of people in the Caribbean--either by those within the area or from outside--has, certainly in the past, never been of sufficient economic weight to support a passenger service by sea. The attempts to furnish this service either by ordinary private enter- prise or by subsidy have all eventually failed. Even as tourism develops towards a year-round activity, many of the countries in the Caribbean, without facilities for tourists, suffer from lack of regular surface communication and means of travel. To a great extent airplanes have come to fill this breach, and there are few points in the Caribbean which are not now served by regular and efficient air service. Volumes could be written on the great benefits contributed by air transportation. The Caribbean area is limited in the methods of communication open to development because of the sea, which separates most of the countries from each other. The airplane, not having to meet surface transportation problems, has been a major factor in the comparatively rapid commercial expansion of the Caribbean in the past two decades. The oppor- :unities for visits by American businessmen have enormously increased, the demand for quick delivery of perishable goods and other urgently needed commodities has been met, fast mail communication has been furnished, and, last but far from least, it has been possible for tens of thousands of short-vacation tourists to enjoy the incomparable attractions of the area. ECONOMIC TRENDS There is no denying that the Caribbean was one of the first areas of development in the New World, development both of economy and of its copartner, transportation. Here, in the Carib Sea and its companion body of water, the Gulf of Mexico, was for the first maritime pioneers in the New World a mag- nificent highway of commerce, a well-protected body of water 50 per cent larger than the Mediterranean, with a much larger num- ber of islands and greater continental frontage, offering lands of greater producing promise. It was a great era of transportation, implementing a sweeping, if not far-sighted, economic boom. The riches of this region-- the gold, the cocoa, the pearls, and the sugar--fell to whatever colonizer could man the best transportation, both commercial and military, for in those unsettled days the man-of-war was an integral support of a merchant fleet. Before long the lion's share of this New World prize uncovered by Columbus fell to Eng- land; and there it stayed, partly due to superior bottoms and partly to the Navigation Acts of Cromwell's time, which pro- hibited ships of other nations from trading with English planta- tions, as some of the West Indies were called. England's superiority on the Caribbean Sea was maintained by a small, efficient, tight ship which was named after the area. It was called the West Indian Free Trader, and it maintained the economic lifeline to the West, just as the large and famous Indiaman provided the riches of an empire in the East for the East India Company and its board of directors on Leadenhall Street. When Donald McKay of Boston built the clipper, a ship that could sail twice as fast as the West Indian Free Trader, the English were immediately thrown upon the defensive. To protect what had been a virtual monopoly upon trade, they were forced to go through a complete transformation in ship- building design, dropping their bluff bow and broad beam, to emulate the long, raked, and speedy clipper ship. By meeting the challenge of better ships and thus recognizing The Caribbean the necessity for unceasing improvement of transport, English commerce protected its Caribbean investment of three hundred years' standing, until the great world wars of the twentieth century. One could, after World War I, however, prophesy the incipient weakening of that control. With World War II, the complexion of transportation and trade in that region underwent a radical change into the condition that we have today. The recent great war had its most important effect on that area in its stoppage of the traditional flow of capital from Western Europe. While the United States had a serious interest in the political entities and composition of this hemisphere, that concern was not matched by a similar interest in trade and transportation outside our own borders. It is amazing how insignificant the American impact was upon these two categories from, say, the year 1850 until the 1930's. In fact, in that century there was a decline of United States interest in transportation and trade routes over the entire Latin American region; and only spasmodic instances can be found of a desire to continue the tradition of those early Yankee merchants whose economic interests were so strongly interlaced with those of their fellow colonies to the south. Nevertheless, during that time the United States was experimenting and building on its own frontier a great network of transportation and construction which is now a valuable back- ground for the postwar role of American business in developing similar enterprise in partnership with its Caribbean neighbors. Today we see finally the overseas arms of the great United States manufacturing and trading companies building and in- vesting with American capital, and placing their stake on the continually improving efficiency of transportation. Now, what direction ought this comparatively new American influence take in the realm of transportation? First, it is hoped that examples of successful private enterprise will be encouraged to create an incentive for investment from within the Caribbean toward better facilities, and toward elimination, for instance, of extra cargo movement involved in lighterage ECONOMIC TRENDS when it is possible and practicable to build deepwater harbors. It is hoped, in this connection, that the traditional antipathy to investments beyond the home plantation itself pn the part of the landowners who control so relatively large a share of avail- able capital may give way to more farsighted policies, policies of capital risk that are hardly risk at all when the~ contribute to creating more efficient methods of moving go ds to market, thereby increasing their competitive worth. It is hoped that the disheartening lack of development of native resources in favor of similar development in more removed and less strategic areas will no longer be laid at the doorstep of inadeq ate transporta- tion. And it is hoped that a great new consciousness of the indispensable factor of transportation improvement will make itself felt as never before in the two million s uare miles of Caribbean lands. Such a consciousness will bel an enormous contribution toward the prosperous future whicd lies in wait. VI I have attempted in this paper to show the interdependence of transportation and economic growth as it applies to the Caribbean area. Time does not allow me to give details of the far-reaching effects of this interdependence. Ecgnomic growth depends on a great variety of factors, but there ardl none to which transportation does not contribute. Transportation brings out- side capital investments in port facilities, it brings employment, tax revenue, modern handling of personnel, dpvelopment of foreign trade, new consumer goods to stimulate the desire for higher living standards, a need for services othbh~rwise not de- veloped, and also the tourists eager to divest themselves of millions of dollars of vacation funds. Countries in the Caribbean should continually bear in mind the need for constant encouragement of transpo nation interests. I cannot say that there has been any lack of encouragement, but at times one is led to suspect that not enough thought is given to the advantages transportation connections can bring, 46 The Caribbean particularly when consideration is being given to foreign trade restrictions, taxes and regulations, facilities for tourists, physical installations, and many other things which can be helpful, but which, when the wrong decision is taken, may have a deleterious effect on transport development. John Akin: ENVIRONMENT FOR UNITED STATES ENTERPRISES IN THE CARIBBEAN SHAD NOT intended to talk to you today about "relations" with Latin America or with the countries of the Caribbean area. That subject, it seemed to me, was far too broad to discuss in a brief period. We are concerned with about a dozen different nations, and I do not believe that our relations with Haiti are the same as they are with Colombia, or the sapie with Costa Rica as they are with Mexico. There are too plany different Actors to consider. But "relations" are made up of many things, including po- itical, cultural, and economic--the usual headings. The way Ne look upon each other is governed principally, I believe, by :he factor which brings us most often into contact with each their That must be business. Then we come to "What type of business?" If you export ,r import, you certainly write to your customer oq' your supplier, ts the case may be. Perhaps you visit each othyr periodically. But if you go into a country and set up your establishment there, rou are living cheek by jowl with the nationals bf the country. You have to get to know each other's good qualities and failings. ivore than that, you get to know what your hosts think of you Ind your methods, and you find out whether they want to make t pleasant for you to remain and to have more of your com- >atriots join you. The Caribbean I would like to review with you that very subject insofar as the Caribbean countries are concerned. Do they like the United States people and business concerns already in their countries, and, if not, why not? Do they want more of us to come in with all our vaunted abilities and techniques as well as our capital? Do their laws and customs and their general treatment of for- eigners hold attractions for us? In a word, what is the environ- ment for United States enterprise in the countries of Middle America? These are not easy questions to answer, and it can be mislead- ing to generalize. We have all heard of spectacular examples, such as the Mexican expropriation of foreign-owned oil com- panies and the Guatemalan government's harassment of the United Fruit Company. We have also seen the profitable and fair treatment of the oil companies in Venezuela. These are matters of record. I mention them simply because any United States business firm considering a substantial investment abroad will look first into the historical treatment of foreign capital and the record over the past. It will not be satisfied with only recent pronouncements or enticements. The potential investor naturally must see reasonably good prospects of earning a satisfactory return in a currency he can use. North American private capital has often shown reluctance to move into countries of the Caribbean, and there have been practical or psychological barriers in some countries on which this reluctance was based. I think that it may be constructive to mention a few of these. First of all, there is the political situation. We know that in many Latin American nations there has been a record of re- peated upheavals and sudden changes in government by un- democratic means. Such changes have sometimes resulted in a new government's disregarding agreements with investors. This has frightened away new capital which might have been used productively to better the standard of living. ECONOMIC TRENDS The second barrier has been the trend towards extreme na- tionalism in some countries, which has resulted in threatened or actual expropriation of foreign-owned property without proper compensation, followed by discriminatory legislation against the enterprise and its personnel. Another major barrier has been the lack of confidence in the foreign exchange situation of some countries where there is a record of several currency devaluations created by recurring periods of dollar exchange shortages. These occurrences have entailed serious losses to investors and have made it difficult, if not impossible, to earn a reasonable profit on the original capital investment. At this point, I want to make it clear that I am not referring to all Latin American countries; some of them have indeed of- fered fair and favorable climates for foreign capital. In some others, however, the barriers I have mentioned do exist, and United States enterprises have suffered unhappy experiences which have created fears in the minds of others who in different circumstances might have taken the step. Why is it that American companies are interested in investing in the countries of Middle America? The principal purpose, of course, of all private business investments in the United States or anywhere else is to make money. It surprises me sometimes how many people do not understand this simple fact. Certainly when you or I put our hard-earned money into any proposition, other than charity, we want the assurance that the principal can be recovered and that we have an opportunity to earn a reasonable return in profits or dividends. By their very nature, investments abroad constitute a greater risk than those at home, and the businessman will want to see an opportunity for a wider margin of profit than he would ex- pect in his own country. Many American business firms do see an evidence of opportunities for business development in The Caribbean the countries of the Caribbean area, but existing barriers or ap- prehension over the treatment they would receive have made them hesitate. I do not think it is necessary to go into detail concerning the advantages that will accrue to the recipient country in welcom- ing private venture capital from abroad. The great advantage is economic development. Private capital investment is the basic key to that development and, wherever there is a lack of suf- ficient domestic capital, economic development will not go for- ward without foreign private capital. Here I must point to Venezuela as a nation which has been a shining example of the open door to private enterprise and foreign capital development. When one considers the fact that Venezuela today has a strong national economy and currency, practically no internal or external debt, good roads, housing, hospitals, schools, and an average per capital income three times that of the rest of Latin America, it is difficult to understand how other neighboring countries can fail to follow her example. Venezuela now receives an income from petroleum taxes alone of almost $700,000,000 a year. Her record of fair treatment of foreign capital has served as an assurance to two major American steel companies in their recent investment of half a billion dol- lars to develop the country's iron ore resources. Of course, other examples of rapid economic development, due in large part to the entry of foreign capital, can be found in our own country and in Canada. The United States, itself, we are apt to forget, was a net debtor country until ten years before the first World War. Fear, therefore, is the deterrent to increased United States capital investment in most Latin American countries. But there is a formidable set of fears on the receiving end as well as on the investing end. There is the fear of economic colonialism; that is, that the foreign capital will be concentrated in raw ma- terial development to the neglect of broad manufacturing, proc- essing, and agricultural production for the home market. There is the fear that the recipient country will realize too little in the ECONOMIC TRENDS way of direct returns from foreign investments, particularly in enterprises producing raw materials. There is the fear that foreign investment endangers national sovereignty through eco- nomic imperialism. Finally, there is the fear that development of extractive industries may perpetuate economic weak spots because of the unstable record of the commodity markets. In my opinion, one good look at what has gone on in Vene- zuela should dispel all these fears. From 194~3 through 1950, more than 3 billion barrels of oil were produced from United States investment with a sales value of over 5 billion dollars. Out of this revenue, 2 billion dollars went directly to the Vene- zuelan government in royalties. One and a half billion dollars was spent for machinery and supplies purchased abroad but which were moved into Venezuela. One billion dollars was spent on wages and salaries in Venezuela, and only 680 million, or 13 per cent of the sales revenue, was transferred out of the country as dividends to the overseas investors. No one in his right mind and in possession of the facts would accuse any of the United States oil companies in Venezuela of being imperialists or meddling in local politics or governmental affairs. Their record is spotless. The fact is that United States private investment in the coun- tries of Middle America, aside from Venezuela, has been dis- appointingly small. But here I want to point out that the basic reason is not entirely the lack of a hospitable "climate." I men- tioned a moment ago that capital investments in new enterprises and in foreign countries have always been risky and that, there- fore, a high rate of return on successful ventures must be the incentive. The mounting tax structure in our own country has taken such a large percentage of the return of successful ventures that a great deal of the incentive is lost. Our government has often proclaimed the necessity for additional private investment abroad, but it has not taken constructive steps in the tax field to promote this investment. There must be a modification of the present procedure of taxing returns from foreign invest- ments by the full difference between the United States rate and The Caribbean the taxes paid in the area where the earnings originated. I urge :hat more conventions for the avoidance of double taxation be negotiated with Latin American nations. While speaking of the part which our government can play in developing a more receptive attitude abroad for investors, I shouldd like to mention that over the past few years a conception 2as grown in many countries that American public funds, through loans or grants, are available for projects which can mnd should be financed by private capital. To quote from the Final Declaration of the 39th National Foreign Trade Conven- ion held in New York in November, 1952: [t is obvious that no progress will be made toward opening the loor to the entrance of private capital from abroad, and par- :icularly from the United States, so long as other nations believe :hat they can draw upon American public funds, and can there- >y escape the obligations and self-discipline which the attraction mnd use of private capital would entail. It cannot be urged too strongly or repeated too often that, if economic development in Latin America or any other area is to proceed along sound practical lines, the major role must be reserved for private enterprise rather than governmental subsidies ,r loans. The Caribbean area abounds with practical examples 3f the increased productivity, the enhanced earning power, the higher living standards, and the improvements in health, sani- :ation, and education which have occurred where a fair oppor- :unity has been provided for the entry of American private capitall with its experienced management and advanced tech- liques. The areas of economic stagnation, on the other hand, Usually coincide with those of a lack of foreign private capital investment. III Now, what can the governments of the Middle American na- ions acquiring outside capital do to bring about a more hospi- ECONOMIC TRENDS table and attractive atmosphere for foreign investors? For one thing, I believe that there must be an attitude of frankness and candor which has not always existed. Those leaders holding elective offices must refrain from resorting to the threadbare but still politically expedient cries against imperialism from abroad. In those countries where there is a growing awareness of the need for foreign capital and technical experience, the government can take practical legislative steps for fair and equi- table treatment. Let us look for a moment at some of the factors which have deterred American direct investment in Cuba during recent years. Twenty-five years ago direct investment of American capital in that country was estimated at over $900,000,000. By the end of 1936 this figure had declined by a quarter of a billion dollars as a result of revaluations, reorganizations of companies, and the general impact of the world depression. American investments have never regained the position which they formerly held, owing in great measure to local legislation. I refer particularly to the laws governing employment which have frequently been impossible to obey without grave financial loss or bankruptcy. In the event of noncompliance, the Cuban government has in many instances "intervened" and managed the company affected until requirements provided in the law were met. Inefficiency has resulted and the interests of investors have been sacrificed. In Cuba foreign companies have been prevented from bring- ing in persons to be trained for managerial positions. Unionist opposition, in addition to the attitude of the government, pre- sents almost insurmountable barriers to the employment of for- eign technicians. To put it mildly, modifications of the law so that foreign companies might employ a reasonable number of experienced and trusted employees trained in the United States, other than officers, would seem desirable. Guatemala, it seems to me, could for the good of its own people and the advancement of its economy deal with foreign- owned transportation companies and plantation operators in a more composed manner and without bending to the pressure of The Caribbean extreme left-wingers and communists. The present attitude does not invite further capital investment from the United States. IV To return to the matter of the present environment for Ameri- can enterprise in the Caribbean: Is the climate such as to attract American investment, and do these countries understand capital development as we know it? I think that the answer for the most part must be in the negative--with, of course, certain important exceptions. There simply does not exist a clear-cut idea as to what American capital can do to help raise standards of living. Furthermore, there is a somewhat different conception of free private competitive enterprise as we know it. Our businessmen have a problem here, and it seems to me that with time and effort they can overcome it. Those United States industries which have already set up enterprises in Latin America have sometimes given too little attention to their public relations. Frequently they have not taken the time to defend themselves against the recurring charges of exploitation that are the stock in trade of irresponsible politicians and of communist agitators. This seems strange, but I believe it is so. I say it is strange because in so many cases United States industries in Latin America can tell an inspiring story of progress often at- tained under severe handicaps. They have every right to be proud of their contribution to the economic and social advance- ment of the areas they serve, and they need apologize to no one for the financial rewards that may have come to them. Foreign capital in Latin America has contributed to the train- ing and teaching of the people it employs, thus raising their earning power and living standards. Many United States com- panies have gone into Latin America to discover that, although their workers were eager and intelligent, the high degree of illiteracy kept these workers from being promoted to skilled jobs. Some of these companies have provided educational facilities for their employees and have thus contributed to an improved ECONOMIC TRENDS literacy rate. This means that many native workers who pre- viously held unskilled jobs are today in supervisory positions. If the story we have to tell is told simply and factually, I am sure that it will go far to dispel the fears I have mentioned. Perhaps it will help our neighbors to understand more fully our own conception of the rights and privileges of private enterprise and the limitations which we believe should bind governments. Many people in Latin America believe that a government has the inherent right to take over and operate private enterprises even without fair or adequate compensation to the owners. Almost every day we read in the news that the Salvadorean government has broadened its supervision of foreign-owned electric power companies, that the Costa Rican government has taken over more United States-owned electric companies, or that the Cuban government has nationalized another railway system. It will take time, of course, to reconcile these different conceptions, which are often deeply rooted. Furthermore, it is astonishing to what extent the average citi- zen in Latin America misunderstands the ownership of large United States enterprises. Often he does not know that owner- ship is distributed among thousands of shareholders, many of whom may be, in a relative sense, no better off financially than he is and may depend for a livelihood on the companies being able to provide regular dividends. American business firms should not overlook any opportunity to impress upon the minds of people abroad that they are sincerely interested in playing a constructive part in the welfare of the countries in which they do business. Finally, I submit that there must be a change in thinking on the part of both American investors and recipient countries from a negative to a positive outlook. This change in attitude, in combination with complete frankness and trust, is the only way in which the fears I have mentioned can be dispelled. Part II SOCIAL TRENDS 6 Carl C. Taylor: SOME LAND SITUATIONS AND PROBLEMS IN CARIBBEAN COUNTRIES L AND PROBLEMS cannot be settled by resolutions passed by those not responsible for specific land situations, but resolu- tions can state the objectives of land policies. The Economic and Social Council of the United Nations in a resolution adopted in September, 1951, stated the following as the basic objectives of land reform programs: (1) to assure security of tenure to the cultivator of land; (2) to provide opportunity for the culti- vator to acquire ownership of land; (3) to promote the organi- zation of land holdings into farms of an efficient size; (4) to assure a fair share of production to the tenant. These were prefaced by a statement that "appropriate measures of land re- form designed to achieve improvement of conditions of agri- cultural populations and increase agricultural production . are a necessary part of any effective implementation of compre- hensive programs of development." The Caribbean Land Tenure Symposiums in 1946 listed eight objectives of a good land tenure system. They give even sharper focus to the part assigned me on this program. They are as follows: (1) responsible freedom of personal action; (2) equal- ity and dignity of all tenure groups; (3) secure possession of rights in land; (4) equitable distribution of rights in property; (5) conservation and development of resources; (6) highly efficient utilization of productive resources; (7) equitable distri- The Caribbean bution of income; and (8) well-integrated community life. These two summarized statements, in essence, say that when those who cultivate the land do not own it, or when as tenants they do not have security of occupancy or receive a fair share of the production from the land, or do not make an adequate living for the cultivator and his family, or when, under any of these conditions, the results are not conducive to good com- munity life, or to the conservation and development of natural resources, there then exists a land tenure problem. These seem to me to be valid and wholesome conclusions. They, of course, force one to say immediately, and without equivocation, that all Caribbean countries have not one but a number of land problems. Land problems in any country are only one part of a total economic, social, and cultural situation. I should like to discuss a few concrete situations in three Caribbean countries--Haiti, Jamaica, and Puerto Rico--which illustrate this basic fact. Before I turn to these situations I should like to make as clear as I can the fact that, in terms of an attack on a given land tenure problem, what appear to be identical problems in two countries may, in effect, be very different problems. The peoples are different. The economies are different. The historic develop- ments have been different, and the alternatives for solution are different. In most of the United States early settlers started as subsistence farmers and developed into commercial farmers. In most of the Caribbean countries slaves were brought in to help develop a strictly commercialized agriculture. When they were emancipated, they became either subsistence farmers or hired men. In the United States the Industrial Revolution developed concurrently and made possible the development of a great sys- tem of family-sized commercial farms. The Industrial Revolution is as yet only partially developed in most Caribbean countries. The results have been either a recrudescence of the plantation system, which produces export crops and is manned by hordes of hired laborers, or a system of very small holdings, the operators of which practice the lowest level of subsistence farming. SOCIAL TRENDS The problem of landlord-tenant relations, a quite universal land tenure problem, exists in both Haiti and the United States. There are many farms of uneconomic size in both countries. In the United States farms are said to be inadequate in size if they yield a gross cash income of less than $3,000. Most of these farms either are in areas out of which people are migrating rapidly into industrial and commercial occupations or they are sharecropper farms, which are decreasing rapidly in numbers. In Haiti the guarantee of the occupancy of even a subsistence farm of a few acres is the difference between a degree of inde- pendence and security, and beggary. In the United States land- lords are very often operating partners with their tenants. Practically all tenant farms are commercial enterprises to which the owner makes a major financial contribution. The issues of equity between the two partners can be rationally calculated. In Haiti the landlord generally contributes nothing to the farm- ing enterprise except the ownership of a shaky title to a piece of land which was given to one of his ancestors a hundred years ago. If he contributes to the operation of the farm it is by a loan to the tenant, for which he collects anywhere from 36 to 100 per cent interest. I present this one brief contrast in order to make the point that in terms of practical first steps toward the solution of concrete problems, the mere statement of ob- jectives of land reform or of the criteria of good tenure systems is only a start. In what follows I am not surveying the land problems of Caribbean countries but selecting three types of attack on land problems, each in a different country. I beg you to keep this in mind, else the significance of what I have to say will not be apparent. I. In Haiti: The Artibonite Valley Haiti was a French colony until 1825, when it was finally granted independence as a result of the slave revolution which started as early as 1804~. During colonial days it was operated The Caribbean as a slave plantation economy, the objective of which was to produce exportable raw agricultural products. Its population of approximately 3f/ million is almost entirely the offspring of African slaves, brought in to operate the plantations. Today only 10 per cent of its cultivated lands are in planta- tions; the remainder is occupied and farmed by small holders, owners, tenants, and squatters. Of its slightly less than 7 million acres of land, not more than 13 per cent is under cultivation. The country is very mountainous, and the amount of cultivated land cannot be greatly increased. In the 125 years since the slave plantation system was abolished, the land resources have diminished rather than increased, and the population has multi- plied seven times. Approximately 85 per cent of the 3f/ million people are rural. Population per square mile is about 300. Per capital income is $25; it is undoubtedly less in rural than in urban areas. Haiti has very little industry. Practically all its exports are agricultural products, 85 per cent of which are coffee, bananas, raw sugar, sisal, and cotton, all primarily plantation crops. Ap- proximately 50 per cent of imports are textiles and food. The country has only 1,700 miles of roads, fewer than 500 miles passable twelve months in the year, and only 50 miles paved. There are literally no central markets in the rural areas and very little means of getting farm produce from farms to central markets and ports. Most of the produce is therefore consumed in farm homes. What is marketed, except from plantations, must be carried out on the backs and heads of humans or on the backs of burros. These are all stern facts which condition any programs of land tenure reform. The program I have selected from Haiti for description is the proposed development of the Artibonite Valley, an attempt to increase productive land. The Artibonite is the largest river in Haiti. The lower portion of its valley is somewhat arid; the upper has a mean annual rainfall of 122 inches. The irrigation and flood control dam, if successfully carried through, will bring approximately 75,000 acres under irrigation. An authority SOCIAL TRENDS (ODVA) has been established by law, and detailed analysis of the area and its potentialities has been made. I understand that the negotiation of an adequate loan from the International Bank will soon be consummated. The project will involve flood control, irrigation, resettlement, agriculture, power, industry, marketing, and transportation development. If successful, as it must be if the loan is to be repaid, the project will increase export products, increase the national income, improve the level of living of some farmers on the irrigated land, and conserve-- and even develop-some now undeveloped natural resources. It will not, however, lessen the population pressure on the valley lands or the other lands of the country. A cadastral survey has been completed for 53 per cent of the project area. It shows that for the area surveyed the average size of independent operating units is only slightly more than 2 acres. The average size of ownership units is approximately 3 acres. It is almost certain that both operating and ownership units in the unsurveyed areas are larger, but there will be no land for additional settlers. The government owns some land (it is not yet known how much) which is not now in full use. There may be some land available for settlement which owners of more than 100 hectares will be willing to sell. But some 500 families now residing in areas which the dam will flood must be resettled. It has been decided that water will not be supplied to owner- ship units of more than 100 hectares (approximately 250 acres) and that the owners and operators of over 75 hectares (approxi- rnately 185 acres) will not be permitted to use the machinery from the farm machinery pools to be established. The tenants' customary rent is now 50 per cent of what they produce. It is proposed that they will pay only 40 per cent when the project is completed. In the portion of the area for which the cadastral survey is completed, almost 85 per cent of the properties are now less than 4f/2 acres in size. Because of these facts and others which I have presented, the plan for the valley states that "any arbitrary or sweeping change in the present ownership pattern The Caribbean is out of the question. Even were the consolidation of several small owners into units of economic size plausible from other standpoints, the fact that this would displace thousands of farm families from the land precludes its consideration."l Because this specific case has been presented merely to illus- trate the difficulty of applying patented land reform objectives to all land situations--in this case primarily efficient size of farms--I will say little more about this heroic and, I hope, magnificent project. There are, however, other good land tenure objectives at stake in the project. One of these objectives, that irrigation still should be furnished to individual holders of up to 250 acres, is pretty liberal. But a second objective, that the landlord should still receive 40 per cent "of the value of the crop obtained from the land over and above irrigation charges," when he now receives only 50 per cent from his farms' arid land, does not represent a very drastic reform in tenant-landlord relationship. As the production under irrigation increases he will be greatly the gainer. If it increases ten times, which it very well may in some cases, he will be the recipient of a large unearned increment. To compel the division of these large holdings would undoubtedly create a problem of the maximum production of commercial farm products. If the holdings, however, were di- vided into let us say 10-acre farms, it requires only simple arith- metic to calculate that from each 250-acre farm 25 small holdings could be created. II. In Jamaica: Land Settlements or Resettlements Great Britain's title to Jamaica was recognized in 1670. Its population at that time was 3,000, mostly slaves previously brought in by the Spanish. The slave trade was abolished in 1807, at which time there were 319,000 slaves on the island. The Emancipation Act of 1833 freed 126,000; a tremendous 1 "Land and Programs for Development of the Artibonite Valley," Vol- ume 5 (unpublished). SOCIAL TRENDS number had already escaped into the mountains. It is their descendants, and those of emancipated slaves, who constitute the overwhelming majority of the population. The first United Kingdom census was taken in 1844, at which time the popula- tion was 377,430. By 1943 it had increased to 1,237,000. It is still increasing. Population density is now approximately 295 per square mile. The slave plantation economy was based on sugar cane, coffee, cocoa, pimiento, ginger, and indigo. After emancipation many estates were abandoned; many were not. Today 900 farms of 200 or more acres include approximately two-thirds of all farm land on the island. They are producing chiefly sugar, coffee, sisal, and bananas. At the other end of the scale are 39,000 farms of less than 10 acres in size, 26,000 of them less than 4 acres in size. The 1943 census shows that only one-third of the holders of more than 1 acre do any off-farm work. This means that some 40,000 farm families must and do derive their whole living from farms of very inadequate size. Cumper estimates that approximately 25 acres would "yield a reasonable living to an owner-cultivator." He shows from 1943 census data that few farms with less than 25 acres are operated by managers and that the amount of time spent in off-farm work declines rapidly when farms are larger than 25 acres.2 It would therefore appear that 25-acre farms, under present conditions, are family-sized farms in Jamaica. If each farm family were provided a farm of this size and all plantations were abolished, there would be room for less than one-third of the present population now living on farms in Jamaica. Many farms with 100 or more acres are operated by managers and hired men. More than one-half of those over 1,000 acres are operated by managers and hired men, some of them by managers and sharecroppers. About one-third--something over 13,000 farms under 10 acres in size--are rented. The other two- 2 George Cumper, Social Structure of Jamaica (Kingston, 1949), pp. 71-72. The Caribbean thirds are small holdings, many of them deep in the mountains, occupied by the descendants of slaves who escaped and sought freedom in isolation. I shall briefly describe only one land reform program in Jamaica, chiefly to illustrate a different attack on land problems from that of the Artibonite Valley development in Haiti. Many of the land problems of the two countries are quite similar. Both have heavy population pressure on the land, Jamaica's less because she has considerable industrial employment. Ja- maica's agriculture is more commercialized because she has more plantations, better roads and railroads, a better organized mar- ket service, and therefore a much greater volume of export farm products. Also, Jamaica has a better school system, a better health service, outstanding welfare services, and a voluntary farmers' organization subsidized by the government, which has forty-six "branches," or community organizations, scattered over the island. The avowed objective of this program is "to underwrite rural welfare with adequate farm income." It, together with the agricultural extension service and experiment station, renders a fairly modern, if not ample, agricultural pro- duction and marketing service. Above all, these services are manned by educated Jamaicans who came up from a level not too far above that of the peasants whom they seek to serve. The land settlement program, under the Land Department, although only one of the attacks on Jamaica's land problems, makes use of all these services, in which many agencies partici- pate. There are now 145 settlement or resettlement projects, some of them for ex-service men, some for sugar estate laborers, some for other landless small farmers. Some of the lands in these settlements were unallocated crown lands, some were from mortgage foreclosures, and some were purchased outright by the government. More than 200,000 acres are included in these settlements, and approximately 25,000 allotments have been made. A brief description of one of them, undoubtedly one of the best, will illustrate the results of this type of project. This settlement was established in 1939. It is near a cane- SOCIAL TRENDS sugar refining plant, and many of the settlers had for years been hired laborers in the cane fields or factory. They were allotted tracts which were supposed to be adequate family-sized farms, sufficient to produce the maximum of subsistence, and in addi- tion some sugar cane as a cash crop. Both the settlers and the Land Department testified that holders of these farms continued for a number of years to work for wages for large cane farmers and made minimum use of their own lands, even for subsistence production. They testified that now all except one of them give full time to their own farm enterprises, some of them employing additional laborers. They grow nearly all their families' sub- sistence needs, as well as poultry and dairy products, and sugar cane for sale. When they turned to full-time farming and had for some time been producing cane for the factory, they became convinced that they were not receiving fair prices for their cane. They were told by the factory that some of their cane was good but that the cane of some of their members pulled down their average; furthermore that the factory could not test for sucrose content in lots of less than 1,000 tons. This drove them into community crop improvement and cooperative marketing of sugar. In this, the experiment station, an extension agent, and an agronomist of the Land Department, assigned to the project, all helped. The field agent also helped them organize dairy and poultry cooperatives. When we visited the project, they had just dedicated a substantial community building. The settlers, who had built the building themselves, had provided it with two health rooms. Because of this the Insular Director of Public Health told us he would provide medical and nursing service to the community. Not all the 145 resettlement projects are as successful as this one. I have briefly described its success because it illustrates an attack which consists of more than a project. It utilizes legisla- tive, educational, health, credit, technical, and welfare assistance, all integrated in a long-range program. It is a general attack on poverty, ignorance, illiteracy, and inequity. It is animated by a militant and widespread sentiment which has for approximately The Caribbean fifteen years been expressed by the slogan, "Building a New Jamaica." Professor T. S. Simey, who left his chair of social science in 1945 to spend a year as welfare adviser to the colonial and insular governments, discussed all of the British West Indies and stated the principles of the process as follows: "In the long run, progress must depend on the proper blending of stimulus and direction from outside with disinterested leadership and executive ability from within."3 The land settlement program and all others previously men- tioned, however, leave one basic land problem in Jamaica un- touched. There are still nine hundred plantations which control and operate two-thirds of the land. By and large they include the most fertile lands on the island. Some of the resettlement projects and cooperative farms are on very difficult land. The laborers working on sugar plantations have a special welfare program with a budget of almost $150,000 per year, but they are tragically underemployed and remain landless. III. In Puerto Rico: Over-all Land Reform The historical and cultural background of Puerto Rico is not greatly different from that of other Caribbean countries. It was a Spanish colony from 1508 to 1898. Its economy, and there- fore its land, was developed to furnish raw products for its mother country. For these enterprises plantations were estab- lished and slaves imported. Throughout the 390 years of Spanish rule, Puerto Ricans struggled for autonomy, but there was never a revolution. The slaves were freed in 1873. In 1898, when Puerto Rico was ceded to the United States, it had a population of approximately 950,000. The precise ethnic composition is not known, but it was a mixture of Indian, Negro, Spanish, and a number of Portuguese, French, Dutch, and other European 3 T. S. Simey, Welfare and Planning in the West Indies (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1946), p. 181. SOCIAL TRENDS 69 immigrants. In contrast to Haiti and Jamaica the population was almost two-thirds white. Under Spanish rule farm production shifted constantly from subsistence to commercial, that is, to exportable crops, chiefly coffee and sugar cane but also some cotton and tobacco. This same trend continued for approximately forty years after Puerto Rico became a part of the United States, with the result that in 1940 0.6 per cent of all farmers owned 30.8 per cent of all land in farms. At the other end of the scale was 73.2 per cent of all farmers, who owned only 15.7 per cent of all land in farms. In addition to these were the landless laborers who worked on the plantations. They constituted 27.3 per cent of the entire working force of Puerto Rico. About 70 per cent of all farm laborers were employed in sugar cane production, about two-thirds of whom had employment of no more than 175 days per year; the other one-third had about 100 days of work. The land reform program, which I shall briefly describe, attacked all the problems involved in this situation. Its story is so well known that I need not describe it in detail. It started with a United States Congressional Act of April 24, 1900, which specified that "every corporation hereafter au- thorized to engage in agriculture shall by its charter be restricted to the ownership and control of not to exceed 500 acres of land." In the face of this law, corporations and plantations continued to keep and even accumulate larger holdings. Packard says, "The record shows that 51 corporations owned 188,871 acres of land in 1940 in violation of the law," and "in addition they operated something over 60,000 acres of leased lands." These, plus the holdings of 291 individual landowners who owned 391,917 acres, were proof that the mere passage of a law had by no means solved the land problem of Puerto Rico.' I need not detail the court battles which ensued when finally attempts were made to enforce the law, or the studies and dis- SW. E. Packard, The Land Authority and Democratic Process in Puerto Rico (San Juan: University of Puerto Rico, 1948), pp. 53-54. The Caribbean cussions which preceded the passage of the Land Law of July, 1941. It is important to note, however, that it was Mufioz Marin, now governor of Puerto Rico, then president of the Insular Senate, who developed the idea of a land authority as an instru- mentality for carrying out the whole land reform program. A few sentences quoted from the preamble of the Land Law will reveal the heart of its purpose and serve to explain why the programs initiated under it have had the public support which they still enjoy. It reads, in part: "It is the fundamental purpose of this Act to put an end to corporate latifundia and to every large concentration of land in the hands of entities legally organ- ized in such a way as to tend to perpetuate themselves, and thus to prevent for all time the division of the great landed estates; and it is likewise the purpose to prevent the appearance of such latifundia in the future." It continues: "This fundamental public policy would not be complete if it were not accompanied by a corollary germane to its nature and scope, the provisions that in the case of land where for natural or economic reasons, the division of the land is not advisable from a standpoint of effi- ciency, the greatest diffusion possible of economic benefits of the land may still be effected, thereby contributing to raise substan- tially the standard of living of the greatest possible number of families. It is with a view to this phase of the legislative purpose that it is considered indispensable to make provision for the creation of proportional-profit farms. .. It is also an integral part of the moral purpose and the aims of dignity and economic freedom embodied in the public policy of the legislative, to furnish the means whereby the social class of 'agregados,' that is, the agricultural laborers enslaved through the fact that they are not the owner of even the lots where they have their homes, will disappear from Puerto Rico. .." To these two--the proportional-profit, large-scale farms and the agregado allotments--must be added the family-size farm program, the rural credit, welfare, and cooperative programs. To use a statement of Revira-Santos, Director of the Social Pro- grams of the Ministry of Agriculture,. "To serve each major SOCIAL TRENDS economic or social need Puerto Rico has established a major institution or agency." With this brief exposition of the basic objectives of the land reform program and brief statement of how the program is implemented, I can recount briefly some accomplishments. The proportional-profit farms range in size from 100 to approximately 1,000 acres. They are operated by managers who receive a portion of the net profit, the remainder of which is distributed to the field workers according to days worked and wages received. The Land Authority supplies the land and operating capital and receives up to 3 per cent of gross income on the investment. It audits all accounts and supervises the contracts with the managers, who are in fact lessors. For the last year for which I have accurate data (194~7) the total profits from these farms was more than $560,000, 65.8 per cent of which was distributed to the almost' 16,000 laborers who participated. Their shares averaged only $23.07, but they had received regular wages during the season and were practically all recipients of the benefits derived from living in agregado communities (Title V). To the people farthest down on the agricultural ladder, the field workers, the land reform has meant most. Even so, their problem is not yet completely solved. It is estimated there were 107,000 of these families who worked on sugar, coffee, and tobacco plantations before the reform program started. They were for the most part landless squatters. They had about 170 days labor per year, most of them on the sugar estates. The first allocation of lots in a planned settlement was made in 1942. By September, 1952, allotments had been made to about 22,000 families in 189 settlements. Governor Mufioz Marin has requested that all remaining agregado families be made allotments within the next seven or eight years. Their garden plots range from one-fourth of an acre to three acres in size. The land is held in usufruct. The Social Programs Administration assists with educational, health, welfare, and co- operative services. It has funds to lend to cooperative housing projects. It now has some bulldozers and well drills to assist in The Caribbean building roads and streets and to help settlers provide water. Basically, however, the program is one of aided community self- help. It has constructed streets, water systems, cooperative stores, schools, churches, community buildings, and athletic fields. Many of the self-built houses are very bad, but some of the new self-help cooperatively built cement block houses are good. Family income is still low, calculated to be $285.70 for the year 1951; 71.4 per cent of it was from agricultural work and 9.8 per cent from industrial work, the remainder from sales, and miscellaneous sources. The proportional-profit farms are all producing sugar cane. They might very well be used in the production of coffee, tobacco, and pineapples. They might take over some large-scale sugar plantations. Agregados should be helped to make much better use of their lands for subsistence and even commercial production. But looked at from the vast number of inade- quate-sized farms, population pressure on the land, low incomes, poverty, and ignorance, all of which are widespread in the Carib- bean, the example of Puerto Rico should be challenging. Her problems are still tough, but she is attacking them in an inte- grated, statesmanlike, dynamic program of over-all land reform. One who is long accustomed to observing and thinking in terms of land situations and problems in the United States has to shift the gears and even the focus of his thinking sharply if he is to see clearly the land problems of the Caribbean countries. In the United States we have from the beginning of settlement always had a favorable land-population ratio. Family farm ownership was easily accomplished over most of our country, and because of this it planted and fed some of the substantial roots of our democratic society. Land from the beginning was a commercial commodity, and farming quickly became a business enterprise in the hands of those who tilled the soil. During the pioneering period of our development our population was built, to a considerable extent, out of foreign immigrants, free men seeking the individual or family ownership of farms. In the Caribbean countries the additional people needed for economic SOCIAL TRENDS development were slaves. The ownership of the land was either held by the crown or granted, in plantations, to large holders. Democratic society was neither developed nor desired. The in- fluences of these historical and economic facts are registered indelibly in the situations which constitute the land problems of these countries; they sharply condition the first practical step in the solution of these problems. There are differences in these problems, but there are also some common denominators. All these countries have at one time been colonies, their economies developed primarily to furnish raw export products. None of them has therefore, until recently, developed industrially. All of them have a high density of popu- lation per square mile with consequent low per capital income and high ratio of unemployment. These, together with high rates of illiteracy, inadequate transportation systems, and inadequate market outlets, not only condition their land situations but deter- mine the feasible methods for attacking their land problems. What I have attempted to do is to illustrate from three dif- ferent countries three methods of attacking land problems. I have done this in order to make some concrete contributions, but also to point up the fact that historical, cultural, and even poli- tical factors condition what can be and is being done. * Francis Violich: URBANIZATION IN VENEZUELA -AN OBJECT LESSON FOR THE CARIBBEAN AREA MY VIEW of urbanization is that, while generally looked on and described as a major problem of our time, it is actually one of the great potentials toward human betterment in our hands today. In this discussion I wish to examine what we mean by urbanization, then to point out some of the problems it has produced, and finally to demonstrate the opportunities and poten- tialities which properly guided urbanization might bring about. For this purpose I have chosen Venezuela as a case study in which we may find experience significant for other countries in the Caribbean in their adjustment to twentieth-century demands and requirements. I. What We Mean by Urbanization First, what do we mean by urbanization? To take the purely physical point of view, we can say it is simply the growth of urban areas as against rural--the development of compact settle- ments consisting of houses, work places, streets, roads, and related facilities. But this definition is inadequate, for urbanization is not a purely physical phenomenon: it can as well be described as a social one--the formation of interrelated collective patterns of social relationships for closer human and cultural interchange. Likewise we might take the economic view of urbanization as an |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| MILLISECOND | CLASS.METHOD | MESSAGE |
|---|---|---|
| 0 | sobekcm_page_globals.constructor | |
| 0 | sobekcm_page_globals.constructor | Application State validated or built |
| 0 | sobekcm_database.verify_item_lookup_object | |
| 0 | sobekcm_page_globals.constructor | Navigation Object created from URI query string |
| 0 | sobekcm_database.verify_item_lookup_object | |
| 0 | sobekcm_page_globals.display_item | Retrieving item or group information |
| 0 | sobekcm_page_globals.get_entire_collection_hierarchy | Retrieving hierarchy information |
| 0 | sobekcm_assistant.get_entire_collection_hierarchy | |
| 0 | cached_data_manager.retrieve_item_aggregation | |
| 0 | cached_data_manager.retrieve_item_aggregation | Found item aggregation on local cache |
| 0 | item_aggregation_builder.get_item_aggregation | Found 'all' item aggregation in cache |
| 0 | system.web.ui.page.page_load (ufdc.page_load) | |
| 0 | sobekcm_page_globals.constructor.on_page_load | |
| 0 | html_echo_mainwriter.add_style_references | Adding style references to HTML |
| 0 | html_echo_mainwriter.add_text_to_page | Reading the text from the file and echoing back to the output stream |
| 36 | html_echo_mainwriter.add_text_to_page | Finished reading and writing the file |