|
![]() |
|
| UFDC Home |
myUFDC Home | Help | RSS
|
|

HIDE
| Front Cover | |
| Table of Contents | |
| Front Matter | |
| Main | |
| Back Cover |
ALL VOLUMES
CITATION
THUMBNAILS
PAGE IMAGE
ZOOMABLE
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Full Citation | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
STANDARD VIEW
MARC VIEW
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Table of Contents | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Front Cover
Front Cover 1 Front Cover 2 Table of Contents Page 1 Front Matter Page 2 Main Page 3 Page 4 Page 5 Page 6 Page 7 Page 8 Page 9 Page 10 Page 11 Page 12 Page 13 Page 14 Page 15 Page 16 Page 17 Page 18 Page 19 Page 20 Page 21 Page 22 Page 23 Page 24 Page 25 Page 26 Page 27 Page 28 Page 29 Page 30 Page 31 Page 32 Page 33 Page 34 Page 35 Page 36 Page 37 Page 38 Page 39 Page 40 Page 41 Page 42 Page 43 Page 44 Page 45 Page 46 Page 47 Page 48 Page 49 Page 50 Page 51 Page 52 Page 53 Page 54 Page 55 Page 56 Back Cover Back Cover 1 Back Cover 2 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Full Text | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
REVIEW Vol XIII, No. 1 Three Dollars Focus on Puerto Rico: Rebirth of the Status Issue, The Political Economy of Later-day Bootstrap, The Soap Opera Continues; Haiti's Dynastic Despotism; West Indian Folk Culture; Colombia's Tobacco Road; Panama Wounded; Primitive Art of a Mexican Master. CARBBE N We've got a love affair going with a fleet of Tall Ships, and we're looking for an intimate group of congenial guys and gals to share our decks. We're not the Love Boat, but we'll take on anybody when it comes to sailing and fun in the exotic Ca- ribbean. There's running' with the wind to great ports o' call for those with itchy feet and a love of adven- ture. Cruises to the loveliest places in paradise start from $425. We'd love to send you our brochure. Windiammcr f CruiMI P.O. Box 120, Dept. 3427 Miami Beach, FL 33119-0120 TOLL FREE (800) 327-2600 in FL (800) 432-3364 Love Windjammer '13arefo m Ouiss PO. Box 120, Dept. 3427 Miami Beach, FL 33119-0120 TOLL FREE (800) 327-2600 in FL (800) 432-3364 NAME ADDRESS CITY/STATE/ZIP. r. I want to share the love affair. Tell me how. In this issue.... Crossing Swords The Status Soap Opera By Jos6 J. Villamil Puerto Rico and the US The Political Economy of Later-day Bootstrap By Roberto Sanchez Vilella Puerto Rico: Equality or Freedom? The Rebirth of the Status Issue By Juan M. Garcia-Passalacqua Haiti's Dynastic Despotism From Father to Son to ... By Williamrn Paley Efficiency Versus Equity Economic Policy Options in the Caribbean By Fuat M. Andic First-Time Anthropology and History Among the Saramaka By Richard Price Anansi Folk Culture An Expression of Caribbean Life By Althea V. Prince Thoughts on Caribbean Society An Anthropological Critique Reviewed by Sidney W. Mintz Page 8 Page 20 The Dual Colonization of an Island A Political and Cultural History of Puerto Rico Reviewed by Olga Jim6nez de Wagenheim Puerto Rican Counterpoint Fernando Pic6 and the Culture of Coffee Reviewed by Lowell Gudmundson Colombia's Tobacco Road Feudalism vs. Capitalism in the Tobacco Fields Reviewed by Philip L. Shepherd Panama Wounded A Poet's Reaction Reviewed by Luis M. Quesada The Charmed World of Manuel Lepe Primitive Art by a Mexican Master By Bea Bender Recent Books An Informative Listing on the Caribbean, Latin America and their Emigrant Groups By Marian Goslinga Page 34 On the Cover "A US annexation of a noncontiguous, Span- ish-speaking country would be 'an even more rancorous issue' in US- Latin American relations than was the Panama Canal." "The past as a precise idea has meaning and value only for the man who is aware that he has a passion for the fu- ture."-Paul Val6ry "The damage done to the human beings went far beyond overt repres- sion of labor or any sim- ple 'polarization' be- tween rich and poor, landed and landless." Los Ni/los de Manuel by Mexican artist Manuel Lepe (oil on canvas, 80 cm x 80 cm). See story on page 41. The New Cuban Presence in the Caribbean edited by Barry B. Levine July 1983, 274 pages $26.50 (cloth), $11.50 (paper) "Comprehensive and well-balanced ideo- logically . useful for courses on interna- tional relations, comparative politics, and Latin American foreign policy." -Carmelo Mesa-Lago, University of Pittsburgh "This book fills a void that has existed in the study of inter-American relations . . The authors' clear, well-written prose is suitable for teaching college students . . especially valuable." -Jorge I. Dominguez, Harvard University This book explores in detail the history and nature of Cuba's influence in the Common- wealth Caribbean, Mexico, and Central and South America, as well as its relations with revolutionary movements and communist parties throughout Latin America. The authors place Cuba's Western Hemisphere contacts within the wider framework of the island's in- volvements with the Third World (especially Africa) and the Soviet Union. The meaning of the new Cuban presence becomes clear in the authors' analyses of the limits to that presence and the way the United States should respond to it. Westview Press 5500 Central Avenue Boulder, Colorado 80301 g1CAr BBiAN KVEWI WINTER 1984 Editor Barry B. Levine Associate Editors Anthony R Maingot Mark B. Rosenberg Managing Editor June S. Belkin Assistant Editor Judith C. Faerron Book Review Editor Forrest D. Colburn Bibliographer Marian Goslinga Cartographer Linda M. Marston Contributing Editors Henry S. Gill Eneid Routte G6mez Aaron L. Segal Andr6s Serbin Olga J. Wagenheim Vol. XIII, No. 1 Art Director Danine L. Carey Design Consultant Juan C. Urquiola Contributing Artists Barrie Bamberg Eleanor Bonner Terry Cwikla Advertising Manager A. D. Austin Marketing Assistant Francisco Franquiz Project Manager Maria J. Gonzalez Project Assistant Marlene Gago Three Dollars Board of Editors Reinaldo Arenas Ricardo Arias Calder6n Errol Barrow German Carrera Damas Yves Daudet Edouard Glissant Harmannus Hoetink Gordon K. Lewis Vaughan A. Lewis Leslie Manigat James A. Mau Carmelo Mesa-Lago Carlos Alberto Montaner Daniel Oduber Robert A. Pastor Selwyn Ryan Carl Stone Edelberto Torres Rivas Jos6 Villamil Gregory B. Wolfe Caribbean Review, a quarterly journal dedicated to the Caribbean, Latin America, and their emigrant groups, is published by Caribbean Review, Inc., a corporation not for profit organized under the laws of the State of Florida (Barry B. Levine, President; Andrew R. Banks, Vice President; Kenneth M. Bloom, Secretary). Caribbean Review is published at the Latin American and Caribbean Center of FIU (Mark B. Rosenberg, Director) and receives supporting funds from the Office of Academic Affairs of Florida International University (Steven Altman, Provost; Paul Gallagher, Associate Vice President for Aca- demic Affairs) and the State of Florida. This public document was promulgated at a quarterly cost of $6,659 or $1.21 per copy to promote international education with a primary emphasis on creating greater mutual understanding among the Americas, by articulating the culture and ideals of the Caribbean and Latin America, and emigrating groups originating therefrom. Editorial policy: Caribbean Review does not accept responsibility for any of the views expressed in its pages. Rather, we accept responsibility for giving such views the oppor- tunity to be expressed herein. Our articles do not represent a consensus of opinion- some articles are in open disagreement with others and no reader should be able to agree with all of them. Mailing address: Caribbean Review, Florida International University, Tamiami Trail, Miami, Florida 33199. Telephone (305) 554-2246. Unsolicited manuscripts (articles, essays, reprints, excerpts, translations, book reviews, poetry, etc.) are welcome, but should be accompanied by a self-addressed stamped envelope. Copyright: Contents Copyright 1984 by Caribbean Review, Inc. The reproduction of any artwork, editorial or other material is expressly prohibited without written permission from the publisher. Photocopying: Permission to photocopy for internal or personal use or the internal or personal use of specific clients is granted by Caribbean Review, Inc. for libraries and other users registered with the Copyright Clearance Center (CCC), provided that the stated fee of $1.00 per copy is paid directly to CCC, 21 Congress Street, Salem, MA 01970. Special requests should be addressed to Caribbean Review, Inc. Syndication: Caribbean Review articles have appeared in other media in English, Span- ish, Portuguese and German. Editors, please write for details. Index: Articles appearing in this journal are annotated and indexed in America: History and Life; Current Contents of Periodicals on Latin America; Development and Welfare Index; Hispanic American Periodicals Index; Historical Abstracts; International Bibliogra- phy of Book Reviews; International Bibliography of Periodical Literature; International Development Abstracts; International Serials Database (Bowker); New Periodicals Index; Political Science Abstracts; Public Affairs Information Service Bulletin (PAIS); United States Political Science Documents; and Universal Reference System. An index to the first six volumes appeared in Vol. VII, No. 2; an index to volumes seven and eight, in Vol. IX, No. 2; to volumes nine and ten, in Vol. XI, No. 4. Subscription rates: See coupon in this issue for rates. Subscriptions to the Caribbean, Latin America, Canada, and other foreign destinations will automatically be shipped by AO-Air Mail. Invoicing Charge: $3.00. Subscription agencies, please take 15%. Back Issues: Back numbers still in print are purchasable at $5.00 each. A list of those still available appears elsewhere in this issue. Microfilm and microfiche copies of Caribbean Review are available from University Microfilms; A Xerox Company; 300 North Zeeb Road; Ann Arbor, Michigan 48106. Production: Typography by American Graphics Corporation, 959 NE 45th Street, Fort Lauderdale, Florida 33334. Printing by Daniels Printing and Offset, Inc., 7404 SW 41st Street, Miami, Florida 33155. International Standard Serial Number: ISSN 0008-6525; Library of Congress Classifica- tion Number: AP6, C27; Library of Congress Card Number: 71-16267; Dewey Decimal Number: 079.7295. 2/CAiBBEAN rIEVIEW The Status Soap Opera By Jose J. Villamil In many ways Puerto Rico reminds one of an interminable soap opera, with differ- ent actors coming on the scene and say- ing pretty much the same things over and over. The basic themes do not change, and events move inexorably towards some pre- ordained ending. Of course the actors never control events; these are defined by the writ- ten script. Such is the nature of Puerto Rican status politics. The local parties act as if they really mattered. Ultimately, however, the status question is being decided by the evolution of the economy, by the United States and its geopolitical interests, and by the tech- nological and cultural changes occurring in the world. Some would argue that the de- bate on status is irrelevant-that Puerto Rico is already a US state for all practical purposes-and that the arrangement only needs to be formalized. Gradual Deterioration A process of decay has been taking place over a period of many years. The govern- ment can no longer provide the most basic services. Thus private firms are providing health, education and personal security ser- vices which should be the primary respon- sibility of the state. Public services have deteriorated to such an extent that the op- portunity-indeed the need-has been created for the development of new fields of private activity, such as the amazing growth of private security services. The economy of Puerto Rico has also been deteriorating for some time. Twenty Crossing Swords is a regular feature of Carib- bean Review. The views expressed herein are the sole opinion of the authors. Editorial board member Jose J. Villamil teaches at the School of Planning, University of Puerto Rico, and does research at the Centro de Estudio de la Real- idad Puertorriqueha. He is the editor of Trans- national Capitalism and National Development and Problemas de la Planificaci6n en Paises Pequehios. years ago it became clear that Operation Bootstrap could no longer satisfy the re- quirements of a broadly-based develop- ment model. Extensive migration to the United States had stopped; new countries had entered the world economy competing with Puerto Rico; federal regulations had increased the cost of operating in the island. Since then there have been many at- tempts to keep the economy afloat. In the mid-sixties petrochemicals were seen as the new leading industry. Then government debt was increased to finance public works and massive increases in public-sector em- ployment. Beginning in 1974 federal funds were thought to be the answer and, finally, the new industrialization relying on US firms which could benefit from Section 936 of the Internal Revenue Code (permitting such firms to repatriate profits from Puerto Rico tax free under certain conditions). None of these attempts has worked. Over the last ten years, the economy has scarcely generated new jobs, with the un- employment rate remaining over 20 per- cent despite efforts to redefine it and low rates of labor force participation. Federal transfer payments have reached close to $5 billion, or $1,600 per capital. Since these funds primarily finance a high level of con- sumption, most of it imported, they have created an "inverted economy," in which levels of consumption are increasingly di- vorced from levels of production. A keen observer of the Puerto Rican economy, Elias Gutierrez, has pointed out its sim- ilarity to the transfer economies of urban ghettos in large US cities. Complex changes which have been tak- ing place have dramatically altered the equi- librium established in the sixties and seventies. Since access to the new technol- ogy is not uniform, technological change threatens not only to leave the island in the backwaters of development, but also to create a more stratified society. In fact, one could speculate that those technologies ori- ented toward stimulating consumption (such as cable TV, automatic tellers, and credit cards) are widely diffused, while those related to production are not. A further problem is the change in federal social and economic policies under Presi- dent Ronald Reagan. Federal transfer pay- ments, which had been growing at a rate of approximately 15 percent over the past dec- ade, are expected to remain static in the coming years. Finally, deregulation and changes in the economic system will gener- ate a new equilibrium in the island. It does not augur well that the industrial sector ex- perienced a growth in net income from $1.5 to $5.2 billion between 1973 and 1982- with no increase in employment. Puerto Rico is witnessing the disap- pearance of the middle class. We are being confronted with an increasingly polarized society in which, due to the stagnation of the economy, the only possible mobility de- rives from migration. In many ways the country's economy is beginning to look more and more like the traditional Latin American economies. However, in the latter the contradictions of the economic devel- opment model are resolved through force; while in Puerto Rico-at least until now- they have been dealt with by increasing federal transfer payments and at times through massive emigration. Political Confusion The pro-statehood parties argue that only statehood can guarantee prosperity (through increased federal funds, for the most part). The commonwealth party has been clamoring for more powers, in the belief that greater autonomy will resolve matters. Both parties, however, propose measures to inevitably further tighten bonds with the United States. Thus there have been bipartisan proposals to make Puerto Rico's tax system similar to that of the US, similar schemes for the use of Sec- tion 936 funds, and investigations of vari- ous tax incentives aimed at stimulating tourism. The prognosis for the Puerto Rican econ- omy is hardly optimistic. Although some sectors will experience rapid growth, as has been the case with the financial sector and manufacturing, the growth will not be suffi- cient to generate the estimated 200,000 jobs needed in the next decade to maintain Continued on page 44 CAiBBEAN Ir IW/3 Operators in RCA plant, Juncos, Puerto Rico, 1967. Operators in RCA plant, Juncos, Puerto Rico, 1967. Contemporary Puerto Rico has its be- ginnings in a new political, eco- nomic and social concept self- consciously envisioned by the Puerto Rican people beginning in 1940. Although aided by a sympathetic administration in Wash- ington, it was conceived of and articulated by a generation of Puerto Ricans whose concern was first and foremost with Puerto Rico and its well-being, and who realized that serious problems had to be faced, in- cluding colonialism, underdevelopment, and economic exploitation within a single- crop agricultural system in foreign hands. At that point, the Puerto Rican people dem- ocratically translated its collective purpose into political will. It is that political transfor- mation and its social and economic conse- quences that have been referred to as Puerto Rico's peaceful revolution. During the Second World War we started to build the government apparatus needed to attain our objectives. Flourishing in the late 1940s, this development was in accord with what had taken place in the developed world. It conceived of the state not only as a regulator but as an active participant in the economic and social process. In fact, we developed an interventionist state. The gov- ernment soon became the crucial factor in the change from an agrarian into an indus- trial society, a transformation that some have labeled modernization. The first steps taken were to reduce the economic and social influence of US sugar companies in Puerto Rico. A law limiting land holdings by corporations to no more than 500 acres was enforced, although it had been on the books since 1900. Diversi- fication of agriculture and the combination of private and public efforts in the distribu- tion and marketing of products encouraged rural workers to become more self-suffi- cient. The government of Puerto Rico un- dertook a social justice program aimed at improving living conditions for all Puerto Ricans, helping them adapt to the new sit- uation. Special emphasis was given to edu- Roberto Sanchez Vilella was governor of Puerto Rico from 1965-1969. He currently teaches in the Graduate School of Public Ad- ministration at the University of Puerto Rico. 4/CAiBBEAN "EVIEW Puerto Rico and the US The Political Economy of Later-day Bootstrap By Roberto Sanchez Vilella cation, health and sanitary conditions, and improved housing; it can be fairly stated that achievements in these areas-especially the first two-were exemplary among de- veloping countries. During the mid-forties we began efforts to revise our political relationship with the United States. Though we had an elected legislature, the governor and several of the most important cabinet members were ap- pointed by the US president. The Elective Governor Act was approved in 1947, and the next year Luis Mufioz Mar in became the first Puerto Rican governor to be elected by the people. In 1952 Puerto Rico approved its own constitution and was established as a "free associated state" with the United States. Puerto Ricans were not exempt from the extraordinary changes that developed after World War II: improved communication, new technology, new international eco- nomic relationships. These, along with US proclamations of justice, order and prog- ress for all, created strong pressures on the Puerto Rican government to respond rapidly to the needs and wants of the peo- ple. Hence the focus was changed from ag- riculture to industrialization, with the stimulus provided by promotion of private investment. Following the prevailing theory, it was assumed that fast economic growth through the transfer of financial, human and technological resources from the devel- oped countries would be followed by mod- ernization, improved social conditions, and full employment. That assumption was to be proved wrong not only in Puerto Rico but in many developing countries. Neverthe- less, we opted for accelerated industrializa- tion using the advantages we had at that time such as abundant labor (in fact, a eu- phemism for low wages), cheap energy and transportation, and the serious commit- ment of the government. Operation Bootstrap Operation Bootstrap-as the industrializa- tion program was known-was based on the 1947 tax-exemption law and other gov- ernment programs to promote Puerto Rico as an ideal location for manufacturing in- dustries. It depended on the importation of capital, technology and expertise from American enterprises. The type of indus- trialization achieved in the early years was characterized by low capital investment by US enterprises or their subsidiaries in labor- intensive plants; exports were almost en- tirely oriented toward the mainland. Nonetheless, Operation Bootstrap was successful during its early years. Puerto Rico underwent important irreversible changes in its economy and society. How- ever there were problems. Despite the rapid industrialization of the 1950s and 1960s, the growth in employment was not suffici- ent to offset loss of jobs in other sectors, especially agriculture. This shortcoming becomes even more pointed when we take into consideration the high level of emigra- tion to the mainland occurring at the same time. Hence Puerto Rico suffered structural unemployment at the rate of 10-12 percent until 1970, despite Operation Bootstrap, migration, and a low rate of participation in the labor force (about 40-50 percent). Another serious problem was that the type of industrialization established in Puerto Rico did not allow for the develop- ment of important vertical and horizontal linkages in the manufacturing sector. Since Operation Bootstrap was based on the at- traction of foreign capital (nearly all inputs were brought from the outside and produc- tion was aimed at export), almost all enter- prises remained isolated producers of goods. Thus there was-and is-an acute lack of linkages among the various eco- nomic sectors in the island causing, in some cases, their sacrifice. The agrarian sector suffered the most. Instead of trying to adapt it to the new technology found in other sectors, it was held back and suffered official neglect. The consequences are still being felt; Puerto Rico does not yet have a coherent agricultural policy. Puerto Rico's rapid economic growth after the Second World War was accom- panied by a high level of industrial in- stability. This means that while many new industries were being established, many were also closing down. At the same time, the local economy became increasingly open as a result of the almost exclusive ex- port orientation of most industries. Puerto Rico today produces what it does not con- sume and consumes what it does not pro- duce. This is reflected in the 1982 proportion of foreign trade in relation to gross national product-1.07-perhaps the highest of any comparable country in the world. Thus our economy is suffering from structural disequilibrium and has be- come increasingly vulnerable to outside forces, particularly to the US economy, which is the source of 64 percent of our imports and the recipient of 84 percent of our exports. The process could have been checked with foresight. Prior to the mid-1960s, the Puerto Rican economy had been only mar- ginally affected by US economic recessions because the government was able to reduce the impact on us of the mainland's eco- nomic cycles by consciously controlling Puerto Rican economic dependence on the US. During the past decade, however, that role has been shed by the government, and now our economy is highly vulnerable to these fluctuations and we are almost powerless to protect ourselves against them. Another serious factor is the almost total absence of local entrepreneurs. Except for the banking sector, our economic growth has depended almost entirely on the attrac- tion of foreign-mostly North American- entrepreneurs. No administration has suc- ceeded in reversing this situation. Sufficient political and educational efforts have not been undertaken to promote the develop- ment of a local entrepreneurial class to sup- plement the imported one. Changes in the Late 1960s During the late sixties, Operation Bootstrap entered a pattern of diminishing returns for several reasons, but primarily because of the loss of the special advantages upon which it was based. One example was the Foreign Trade Expansion Act, which re- duced tariffs by 35 percent for three years and had a devastating effect on the labor- intensive apparel and shoe industries. An- other problem was created by congres- CAR?BBEAN PeVIW/5 Bottle production, Arecibo, Puerto Rico, 1954. sional decrees in 1967 and 1968 which increased the minimum wage in Puerto Rico by 14 and 13 percent, respectively. This action was not warranted since Puerto Rico's economic conditions are far different from those of the affluent United States; for all practical purposes, what is considered a minimum wage in the US becomes an aver- age wage in Puerto Rico. Thus what at first glance may appear to be an improvement for the workers may well result in hardship, because the island's competitive position with Third World countries is weakened. The situation has become even worse with the application to Puerto Rico, since 1977, of federal minimum wages, a result of the present government's ideological commit- mentto statehood. Yet another difficulty was presented by the 1966 and 1970 Federal Maritime Commission modifications, which reilited in a 45 percent increase in sea transportation costs. To offset these changes, an effort was made during my administration to develop a heavy oil industry, taking advantage of federal government quotas for importing the then cheaper foreign crude oil. Several oil refineries were attracted to Puerto Rico and significant investments were made in the petrochemical field. Since the effort was based on factors beyond Puerto Rico's control (import of cheap crude oil and federally established quotas), it eventually failed. The 1970s and 80s During the last decade, our economy has undergone a sharp process of deterioration. Facing stagnating industrial and construc- tion sectors, a persistent low level of agri- cultural activity and reduced tourism, the government used its credit as a rescue de- vice. Between 1973 and 1976 the Puerto Rican public debt rose to the point that to- day we have the dubious honor of possess- ing one of the highest per capital debts among all US jurisdictions. In addition, the government assumed the role of employer; about 25 percent of the island's active labor force works for it. This striking increase in public employ- ment and other service areas began with the questionable policy of using the govern- ment's credit to finance them. They were further augmented by increased transfer payments and other contributions by the federal government. In fact, the annual rate of increase of about 1.2 percent in Puerto Rico'ds gross real product during the last decade has been the result of increased per- sonal and government consumption ex- penses. The increases were made possible by the growth in federal transfer payments to Puerto Rico (in 1982 these payments amounted to 23 percent of total personal consumption and 49 percent of govern- ment expenses) rather than by improve- ment in real production. Thus during the last ten years, the main characteristics of Puerto Ricds economic life have been increased vulnerability of our economy with respect to the United States' business cycle, a dramatic increase in pub- lic indebtedness, growing dependence on federal funds, and the so-called "936 indus- tries" (referring to Section 936 of the US Internal Revenue Code dealing with the sys- tem of taxation applicable to the "posses- sions' corporations") whose earnings in Puerto Rico are exempt from federal taxes. Because of the weakened economic structure, President Reagan's budgetary and monetary policies have created havoc on the island. Stabilizing the amount of 6/CA,?BBEAN REVIEW federal transfer payments made to Puerto Rico has had a recessionary impact on the local economy. Restrictive monetary pol- icies have affected already-depressed areas such as construction, housing and other productive sectors. Several measures taken to stimulate and improve conditions for the private sector in the US have had the op- posite effect in Puerto Rico, where federal government incentives in fact reduce the tax and location advantages formerly enjoyed by the island. Further, Congress has begun questioning the tax exemptions granted to the 936 industries and initiating proposals to reduce, or even eliminate, what is in- creasingly being perceived as an unjustified privilege. Because of the close economic links be- tween Puerto Rico and the US, it is assumed that the island's economic recovery will de- pend, to a large degree, on the extent of the US recovery and the net federal transfer payments made. The experience of the last decade demonstrates without doubt that a recession in the US economy will have a similar, perhaps more intense, effect on the Puerto Rican economy. However we cannot be certain that the converse is true-that an expansion in the US economy will cause an even greater expansion in the island's econ- omy. It is risky for the Puerto Rican political leaders to put all their eggs in that basket since the economic problems are structural rather than conjunctional. Even in the im- probable case that the Puerto Rican econ- omy does respond positively to a US recovery, it must be remembered that its production in relation to employment has been, and is, inadequate. The major lesson to be learned from our experience of the last 40 years, therefore, is that the existing political and economic framework is too limited and restricted to accomplish what is necessary. All three ma- jor efforts attempted during that time were flawed: the light, labor-intensive industries depended upon the maintenance of a differ- ential between federal and island minimum wages; the attempt to develop heavy indus- try based on oil refineries depended on federally-established quotas for the import of cheap crude; the present effort, based mainly on pharmaceuticals, depends on the maintenance of the tax exemptions granted to Puerto Rico-based earnings of these in- dustries. Thus in all three instances, our efforts have depended upon foreign-ex- ternal-factors over which we have no control. It must therefore be accepted that Puerto Rico has undergone dependent develop- ment, that it has progressively lost control of its economic processes, that after 40 years of efforts unemployment has reached rec- ord levels instead of decreasing, and that for all practical purposes, Puerto Rico is rapidly becoming a subsidized society. Undoubt- edly the need for intelligent, rational and careful change is obvious. That must be the task for the immediate future. What is Needed For more than a decade, it has been in- creasingly evident that Puerto Rico's economic development program is insuffi- cient. It is impossible to continue relying on public debt and federal government transfer payments to avoid further decreases in in- come and employment. Because of that reliance, the government of Puerto Rico has abandoned its crucial role as the prime mover and stabilizer of its economic life to become another employer-the largest Operation Bootstrap was successful during its early years. Puerto Rico underwent important irreversible changes in its economy and society. one. Moreover, the openness of its economy has made Puerto Rico increasingly vulnera- ble to, and dependent upon, external factors. The lack of an encompassing economic and social program and the wait-and-see attitude of Puerto Rican political leaders will lead to an indefensible local situation or make many Puerto Ricans permanent emi- grants. Either alternative is unacceptable. A strong negative instead of positive atti- tude now prevails due to the lack of a clear recognition of the structural changes affect- ing Puerto Rican economic life and the re- sulting absence of an adequate program to deal with them. The people are against rather than for something. Accordingly, the rejection of those in power does not imply the acceptance of those seeking office. Elections are used to demonstrate dissatis- faction rather than support of a program or set of ideas. That does not make for a healthy democratic system nor does it allow for creative use of the political process. The government must resume its central role as the promoter of economic and social change. One should not forget that this is an island with more than 900 inhabitants per square mile and with insufficient and unbal- anced economic growth highly vulnerable to external factors. To apply to Puerto Rico Reagan's doctrine that "government is the problem" is to invite catastrophe. In short, the government of Puerto Rico must ex- change its current role as another em- ployer-a role that is both inefficient and untenable-for that of formulator and coor- dinator of a long-range economic program. The main features of such a program should include, among others, the follow- ing: (1) development of a scientific and technological center in the island to spon- sor specialized research, for which Puerto Rico already has much of the needed human resources; (2) development of a lo- cal entrepreneurial class to complement the existing one, but in such a way so as to avoid economic, technical and social marginality for large groups of Puerto Ricans; (3) pro- motion of production for internal needs without neglecting the international mar- ket, and thus development of the critical vertical and horizontal economic linkages; (4) recovery by the government of its role as an anti-cyclical factor in economic develop- ment; (5) strengthening and enlarging the powers and responsibilities of the Govern- ment Development Bank so that it may not only effectively serve Puerto Rico'ds develop- ment needs but also regulate multiple and complex banking and financial activities; (6) giving top priority to energy since Puerto Rico must develop alternative sources to oil imports; this is an essential condition for the success of an expanded and diversified economic development program. Even though incomplete, the preceding set of proposals is ambitious. But nothing less is needed if Puerto Rico is to overcome its present crisis and avoid a deeper one. The United States, as the other partner in the association, should have a deep interest in our surmounting this difficult situation, not only out of generosity and sympathy but also for its own interest in averting potential internal and international difficulties. It should be clear that for Puerto Rico to achieve the goals set forth it needs greater political power. The least that will suffice is that (1) Puerto Rico be able to protect its own economic sectors, especially those re- lated to its internal market; (2) the Puerto Rican government be given a voice in all international economic agreements en- tered into by the US that directly affect the island; (3) the government of Puerto Rico be allowed to participate in regional eco- nomic and financial organs and in interna- tional organizations dedicated to educa- tional, cultural and scientific matters; (5) the US Congress and other federal offices exer- cise caution in adopting measures that may distort or obstruct Puerto Rico's economic program; (6) the restrictions that today so strongly affect maritime transportation be relaxed or eliminated. Obviously this calls for political vision of the highest order. Puerto Rico is rapidly be- coming a problem for the United States at both the national and international levels. Nationally, there is the problem of the an- nual need for billions of dollars to keep our economy functioning and the fact that many programs, such as those comprising President Reagan's "New Federalism," may cause undue harm to Puerto Rico even if Continued on page 44 CAI?BBEAN rEVIEW/7 Puerto Rico: Equality or Freedom? The Rebirth of the Status Issue By Juan M. Garcia-Passalacqua ecolonization in the Caribbean has left the United States and Puerto Rico behind. The reason for this his- torical lag is not simply substantive, but also archtypical. Assumptions have not con- verged in the last 85 years. Discussion has been based on different perceptions of real- ity that have made communication impos- sible. The relationship is conceived in one way by the metropolis; the elite in Puerto Rico has a different conception; the masses differ from both the United States and the elite; and finally, the international commu- nity has added its own different models to an already complicated situation. The major players in the game have never agreed on the rules. American Colonial History The American invasion of Puerto Rico in 1898 occurred in the middle of a national debate in the United States over imperial- ism and democracy. In the original debate, the question of whether a democracy could or should have colonies became crucial. Since the debate was dictated by opposing paradigms, it was inconclusive. Transform- ing the contradiction into a virtue, a "third way" was found in which the nation could hold something called "unincorporated ter- ritories," that is, territories not directed to- wards eventual statehood and equality within American democracy. It is precisely this model of territorial unincorporation, this failure to see the problem as such, that is the basis for the incapacity of the United States to solve its colonial problem. In the case of Puerto Rico, the military occupation, the Foraker Act of 1900, the Jones Act of 1917, the Elective Governor Act of 1948 and even Public Law 600 of 1950, were only successive grants of "self- government" to the people of the territory, Juan M. Garcia Passalacqua is a Puerto Rican writer and political commentator. He writes a weekly column for the San Juan Star. This essay is excerpted from his forthcoming book, Puerto Rico: Equality and Freedom at Issue in the Caribbean, to be published by the Latin American Series of the Hoover Institution, ed- ited by Robert Wesson. without changing the essential territorial nature of the relationship between the is- land and the United States. In contrast, the Philippines, for example, were recognized after a decade under the American flag to be on the way to independence, and that recognition was the basis for its "common- wealth" status, one directed at preparing the islands for independence in the near future. However, in the case of Puerto Rico, the metropolis could not decide at the time of the invasion, nor even 85 years later, whether the territory was to be disposed of, as the constitution provides, or whether it was to be made a state of the union. The process of creation of common- wealth status, when analyzed from a para- digmatic point of view, raised several important questions that have been un- answered in the last three decades. The his- torical record shows clearly that the United States thought it was doing one thing and the leadership in Puerto Rico thought it was doing something else. Was it more self-gov- ernment or a new form of federalism? Was it a process of self-determination or the legit- imation of colonialism by the consent of the governed? Was it transitory or permanent? In the absence of answers to these ques- tions--answers that have not been forth- coming from either the powers that be in the United States or the Puerto Rican politi- cal elite-it is not difficult to conclude that what happened in 1952 was in effect a transformation of the problem into the solution. Between 1952-1968 the selective inat- tention policy meant the refusal to consider the autonomistt" proposals of improve- ment of "commonwealth" status, while un- leashing a campaign against pro-indepen- dence followers in the island. Ironically, it has been the potential for a statehood re- quest from Puerto Rico that has given the most important impetus to decolonization. The results of the 1968 elections were received in Washington with great skepti- cism, and two schools of thought devel- oped: one that believed the electoral victory to be a freak resulting from the division of the autonomist Popular Democratic Party, and another that gave it grave implications and predicted a request for statehood in the coming decades. A high official in the State Department of Henry Kissinger, Arthur Borg, was asked to do an in-depth study of the issue of Puerto Rico. In retrospect, the Borg study, entitled "The Problem of Puerto Ricds Political Sta- tus" (Senior Seminar in Foreign Policy, US Department of State, 17th Session, 1974-1975) has become a seminal docu- ment in the consideration of the Puerto Rican issue by the metropolis. Borg at- tacked the lack of public attention to the issue, as well as "the absence of a purpose- ful or adequately coordinated approach to basic Puerto Rican policy questions on the part of those American officials who bear the responsibility for formulating various aspects of the policy." The author pointed out the difficulties in developing an econ- omy in the island that would sustain the level of postwar growth. He attacked greater out- lays of federal funds as a solution, calling it "an under reed on which to hang a hope." He attacked the prospects of "Puerto Rico eating one cake out of the federal relation- ship while enjoying another, more sov- ereign, cake made out of the common- wealth relationship." Arthur Borg pointedly asserted that "what is most curious about all this is that there has been no real US-Puerto Rican confron- tation during the past 20 years over the clearly opposed conceptions of the nature of the relationship." His paper, he admitted, was prompted by the attempt by Puerto Rico's Resident Commissioner Jaime Benitez to get the approval in Congress of a "Compact of Permanent Union Between the United States and Puerto Rico" in February 1975. The attempt, he said: "raises in the clearest form yet the fundamental question of whether the Congress will be prepared to give formal legislative assent to the com- pact theory, while simultaneously permit- ting Puerto Rico to retain all the economic benefits it enjoys under its present some- what ambiguous legal status." Borg pointed out that Washington sources he consulted were virtually unan- imous in the view that the effort was doomed to failure because the Ad Hoc 8/CA,?BBEAN leVIEW Committee that recommended the new "compact" had been "playing outside the rules," and would open what the author termed "the Pandora's box of aid versus au- tonomy." All he could see as possibilities were noncontroversial changes in the Federal Relations Act. But not even that was obtained from Congress. He then con- cluded: "perpetuation of commonwealth status has made it possible for our leader- ship to avoid considering what the conse- quences would really be if Puerto Rico were actually to opt for either statehood or inde- pendence." He added "the present situation is not a healthy one." The most important contribution of the Borg study to metropolitan thinking on Puerto Rico was his assertion that "We really can't afford to leave this matter entirely to a process of the Puerto Ricans 'figuring out' what they want." Borg proposed that a per- son be designated in the White House "to take the initiative in searching for ways in which the US can help 'steer' the Puerto Rican political status question, rather than continue to drift along in the illusory expec- tation that Puerto Rican 'self-determination' will answer that question before we are con- fronted with real trouble in the island." He suggested a presidential statement or con- gressional resolution setting forth an up- dated public position on Puerto Rico's status to clear the political air, while inter- nally, the US would "decide whether we are really prepared to support commonwealth in perpetuity, or whether we must prepare now for an eventual move to either state- hood or independence." The Evolution of American Policy President Carter's statement of 25 July 1978, reiterating US commitment to self- determination for Puerto Rico, led to several developments in recent years that indicate a willingness in the metropolis to face the colonial question for the first time since 1898. Internal proposals in various depart- ments of the US government lead to the conclusion that the United States may be on the verge of recognizing that it indeed has a colony in the Caribbean Sea. Four studies CAI?BBEAN l9vieW/9 will serve as examples of the reevaluation. In April 1977, Albert N. Williams, a For- eign Service officer then studying in the National War College, wrote a paper on Puerto Rico that remained classified until very recently. ("Puerto Rico: Common- wealth, Statehood or Independence?" Na- tional War College, April 1977). The paper examines what it terms the growing inten- sification of "subnationalism" in the world, explores US "interests" and "costs" regard- ing Puerto Rico, and concludes that the sta- tus quo is becoming increasingly unattrac- tive politically to both the United States and Puerto Rico. The author attacks the present condition of commonwealth status as "a political limbo," a "quasi-colonial" status. He argues that even if Puerto Rico has some military value (as staging area, communica- tions center, training site, and protector of sea lanes) the greatest US interest in the island is political (because of democratic ideals, as a bridge to Latin America, as a Third World issue, and because of the mas- sive migration to the continental US). These economic, strategic and political interests, however, are being maintained at what the author terms "increasing costs." In economic terms, he explains that "the cur- rent relationship with Puerto Rico is costly to US taxpayers." Apart from the high finan- cial costs (about $3 billion annually in 1977), the author finds a greater social cost in maintaining a sizable segment of the Puerto Rican population on federal welfare payments over an extended period of time. The continued persistence of poverty, he adds, "sours" the relationship with Ameri- cans. However, the paper indentifies as the greatest political cost of all the international embarrassment to the United States. Williams criticizes the need to spend "a siz- able amount of political capital" in seeking favorable votes in the United Nations Gen- eral Assembly. It is at this point, as an alter- native, that the paper asks: "Is Puerto Rican independence feasible?" and gives a re- sounding affirmative answer. The study concludes: "Thus, by today's international standards, in terms of population, size or per capital GNR it is by no means incon- ceivable that Puerto Rico can take its place as a full-fledged and active independent member of the growing concert of nations. It is within this changing international con- text, where nationalism (and subnational- ism) and its twin, anti-colonialism, are the most powerful and pervasive political forces in the world today, that the future United States-Puerto Rican relationship should be examined.... It is not unreason- able, therefore, to hypothesize an in- creasingly independent-minded, self-as- sertive, and confident Puerto Rico which may eventually choose total independence from the United States in harmony with cur- rent worldwide reality and trends." On the basis of these conclusions, the Williams study recommends that the US "should place no political barriers in the path of a more independent and autono- mous Puerto Rico," and that the United States should "act responsibly and provide long-term and generous treatment to facili- tate the transition." By this proposed policy, the United States "can effectively move to silence those strident voices which continue to charge that the US remains an imperialis- tic nation committed to preserving its colo- nial dominance over Puerto Rico." In Summer 1979, a second study was undertaken by another Foreign Service of- "Perpetuation of commonwealth status has made it possible for our leadership to avoid considering what the consequences would really be if Puerto Rico were actually to opt for either statehood or independence." ficer, Eric Svendsen, and published in the State Department's private organ, Open Forum. Svendsen entitled his essay "Puerto Rico Libre" (Open Forum No. 20, Spring/Summer 1979). This author took the 1978 hearings be- fore the Decolonization Committee at the United Nations as an example that Puerto Ricans are clearly dissatisfied with the cur- rent status relationship and that "the current quasi-colonial relationship between the United States and Puerto Rico is growing untenable." The author stated at the outset his belief that the only viable status for Puerto Rico is independence and argued: the United States should take steps to pre- pare the Puerto Rican people. Svendsen argues that Congress may be reluctant to admit Puerto Rico as the 51st state and claims ethnic considerations may play a role in that decision. He then attacks the US Government for not having encour- aged independence and reveals a-still to this day undisclosed-poll that showed 20 percent of the inhabitants favor indepen- dence, calling it "a more accurate estimate of the true sentiment." He argued: "Puerto Rico is a unique cultural and geographical entity which has never been, and probably never can be, assimilated into the US main- stream. There is a significant gap between the desires of many Puerto Ricans and what they are likely to obtain from Congress .... Puerto Rican frustrations can be expected to grow. ... Serious consideration should be given within the US Government to pre- paring Puerto Rico for independence. For too long it has been assumed in Wash- ington and San Juan that Puerto Rico must remain a part of the United States. It was this attitude which led to a morally dubious FBI Cointelpro operation in Puerto Rico con- ducted throughout the sixties, the purpose of which was to disrupt the activities of pro- independence forces. Nowadays, anything which even remotely smacks of colonialism is unacceptable to world opinion, and met- ropoles are rapidly granting independence to their remaining colonial territories. Why not the United States? ... Puerto Ricans themselves may be more prepared psycho- logically for independence than is com- monly acknowledged. Leading statehood advocates, including the governor, have said that if their preferred status option is rejected, they would have no alternative but to opt for independence. ... An indepen- dent and friendly Puerto Rico would not significantly alter the strategic situation in the Caribbean." After this analysis, the author answers his own question: "What is to be done?" He recommends an extended transition pe- riod, extensive consultations with Puerto Rican leaders, and a program "to remove the stigma that the advocacy of indepen- dence is somehow traitorous." Svendsen disagrees with the policy that the status is- sue is for the Puerto Ricans alone to decide and predicts that for the United States to take no action may consign Puerto Rico to irresolution. US security interests, he ar- gues, are clearly secondary to the future of the Puerto Rican people. "We can insure that an independent Puerto Rico will be friendly," he concludes, "only if we act now to prepare Puerto Ricans for this eventuality .... Only by offering independence as a viable option, clearly acceptable to Con- gress and the American people and under- stood as such internationally, can the US aspire to maintain the goodwill of the Puerto Rican people and the respect of our friends and allies." In April 1980, another paper was pre- pared on Puerto Rico for the State Depart- ment's Executive Seminar in National and International Affairs, this time by Dolores Wahl, entitled, "Puerto Rico'ds Status: A Prob- lem for the Eighties" (Executive Seminar in National and International Affairs, 22nd Session, April 1980). The author predicted that for Washington, "the pain may become unbearable" on the issue of Puerto Rico in the coming years. She concurred that all sectors in the island want and expect a change in commonwealth status. She pointed out the declining support for com- monwealth and the increasing support for statehood. The author saw two problems with an impending statehood request: First, 1 0/CAIBBEAN E'vIEW Puerto Ricans will demand the retention of Spanish as their official language and Con- gress may refuse; and second, Puerto Rico could not assume the tax liability of a state without being relieved of its current public debt. Wahl did not see in Congress the re- quired "imaginative policies and compro- mise" necessary to achieve these two goals and emphasized that "if an agreement on statehood cannot be reached, indepen- dence rather than commonwealth may be the political resolution." The study proposed several measures to deal more effectively with the status issue: "First, a plebiscite should not be held until the meanings of the three options are clearly defined and agreed to by Wash- ington and the four political parties in San Juan. Secondly, a plebiscite vote to be meaningful must show more than a simple majority of those voting and that they have understood the consequences of their choice. Thirdly, rather than continuing to deal with Puerto Rico through many and varied agencies, overall responsibility for Puerto Rican affairs would be centralized in one office-preferably in the White House." Even if emphasizing mostly procedural questions, the study by Ms. Wahl supports the understanding of the previous exer- cises, from Borg to Williams to Svendsen. She termed the question "a Washington bu- reaucratic nightmare," and identified that as the immediate problem, with the caveat that no Puerto Rican agrees with the diagnosis of the problem as a bureaucratic one. Coin- ciding with the earlier studies, however, she pointed out that it is necessary for Puerto Rican policy to be planned, coordinated and advanced by one government office. To plan, coordinate and advance what? The answer seems to be her conclusion that independence "would create fewer foreign policy and economic problems for the United States than statehood." If Congress refuses to retain Spanish as the official lan- guage or to assume the public debt, "inde- pendence may be the only solution." In early 1982, one more paper was pub- lished in Open Forum, this time by David E. Simcox, a Latin American specialist in the State Department. His study, again elab- orating on the previous four, switched the old theory of "self-determination" for the island, and was entitled "The Future of Puerto Rico: Self-Determination for the Mainland" (Open Forum, 1981). Simcox went right to the point: "In recent years con- siderable momentum has developed within the American political process for Puerto Rico's statehood option. However, at the same time, arguments are increasingly im- pressive that the interests of the United States would be best served by declining any Puerto Rican petition for statehood, by placing a time limit on the existing com- monwealth arrangement, and by commit- ting the United States to the independence of Puerto Rico. These actions should be taken with the support of a majority of Puerto Ricans if possible, without it if neces- sary." Internationally, Simcox argues, US in- terests would be harmed by Puerto Rican statehood. However scrupulously a plebiscite that resulted in statehood were carried out, he adds, it would be flawed in the eyes of the world if conducted within the framework of the existing US-Puerto Rican relationship. A US annexation of a noncon- tiguous, Spanish-speaking country would, Simcox believes, be "an even more ran- corous issue" in US-Latin American rela- tions than was the Panama Canal. What Simcox is most concerned about is the possibility that the people of Puerto Rico may vote for statehood without understand- ing its implications, and whether less than unanimity would be a safe basis for grant- ing statehood, since the danger of an inde- pendence movement fighting bitterly to reverse the statehood decision is contem- plated, using the IRA in Ulster as a point of reference. The author's recommendation is equally frank: "If Puerto Rico wants the trap- pings of nationhood, then it should be an independent nation. It should not be our 51st state. Following a 10-year transition period to resolve the obligation of defense, development, and citizenship, the United States should offer Puerto Rico a golden handshake of farewell with generous finan- cial compensation." These papers produced by members of the American bureaucracy between 1977-1981 serve to demonstrate an evolu- tion in the formulation of American policy on Puerto Rico during the administration of President Jimmy Carter. The Reasons for Change In a 1982 column, the editor of the San Juan Star pointedly asked: "Why does the Reagan administration persist in treating Puerto Rico, its most visible presence in the Caribbean and its most shining example of development, so shabbily? How can one possibly match the heavy concern over the Soviet threat with the heavy blows received here from Washington of drastic food as- sistance cuts, the 936 program bombard- ment from the US Treasury, and the inherent damage of Reagan's Caribbean Basin Initiative?" In a radio interview a week later, former Governor and top Puerto Rican GOP leader Luis A. Ferre provided an answer when he candidly stated: "The government of the United States will not give us any more time CAr?BBEAN FETieW/ 11 SWAS TWINKIK AOUT MY STATE-OFNEVION MESSA6EWHE ALL OF A PEN.. Copyright 1977 by Herblock in The Washington Post. to wait for a solution to the status issue." A few months before, Ferre had told the press in San Juan: "If Puerto Rico does not decide soon for statehood, it might face in the long run a United States decision to make it independent." The last time Ferre saw President Rea- gan, on 12 January 1982, together with Governor Carlos Romero Barcel6, Resident Commissioner Baltasar Corrada del Rio, and San Juan Mayor Hernan Padilla, the President spoke with them for 15 minutes. Most of the time he spoke about the attempt on his life, implying that the Puerto Rican issue could provoke another. Unknown to his visitors, presidential aides had dis- covered a letter bomb in his 17 December 1981 mail, postmarked from Puerto Rico. The president's second subject was his re- fusal to amend President Jimmy Carter's 25 July 1978 statement offering Puerto Rico alternative decisions for its future, including independence as a legitimate option. The statement of options remains in the US In- ternational Law Digest as the official policy of the United States. Reagan offered instead, a press release "still" favoring statehood for Puerto Rico, to be picked up by his visitors "on the way out." Finally, and most impor- tantly, the president took one of his visitors, Mayor Hernan Padilla, aside as they were walking out and told him clearly: "You can't keep coming up here asking for a piece of the meal." In much more sophisticated terms, the economic study on Puerto Rico undertaken during the administration of President Car- ter had come to a similar conclusion: Puerto Rico has ceased to be economically profit- able to the United States. The colony is now an economic liability. Puerto Rico currently receives more funds from the United States-$4.7 billion a year-than any na- tion in the world except Israel. President Car- ter is said to have asked one of his aides for "the bottom line on Puerto Rico: how much does it cost us?" The answer, provided in a private memorandum and based on the massive $1 million study undertaken under the direction of Secretary of Commerce Juanita Kreps, showed undeniably that the "cheaper" option for the United States would be independence for Puerto Rico. The question of decolonization of Puerto Rico in the 1980s can be faced if one an- swers three significant questions: What have been the obstacles for Puerto Rican independence between 1898-1983? What has been the role of commonwealth status in the history of the relationship? What new elements have appeared between 1968-1983 to drastically change that situation? The nature of the problem in the 1980s is essentially paradigmatic. It was Justice Fuller who predicted the future in the dis- senting opinion in Downes a Bidwell, at- tacking the "third way," when he claimed the decision would keep Puerto Rico "like a dis- embodied shade, in an intermediate state of ambiguous existence for an indefinite pe- riod" (Fuller, dissenting, 182 US 244,1901, p. 372). It was in 1922, after the "third way" theory had been once again validated by the full court that an effort was made to legally legitimize an intermediate political condi- tion called estado libre asoclado, modeled after the Irish Free State, and the clear pre- cursor of the commonwealth status created in 1952. This incomplete decolonization has been defended by some as a final and permanent one. Arnold H. Leibowitz, former General If Congress refuses to retain Spanish as the official language or to assume the public debt, "independence may be the only solution." Counsel for the Puerto Rican Status Com- mission of 1964-1966, has attempted, once again, to transform the problem into the solution. He argues that as a result of the decolonization process, a new form of state is arising among the nation-states: the "as- sociated" state, which he predicates as the way to make the US island territories more self-governing without the relationship of statehood. Leibowitz claims that Puerto Rico has built upon the Philippines' experi- ence (in which commonwealth status was a transitory stage towards independence) but has looked towards a permanent associa- tion. Based on the 1960s commission re- port, which "affirmed the commonwealth as a third status alternative," he argues that commonwealth status "is gaining accep- tance within the American political system and in American law." Sadly, he ignores all subsequent developments. However, the model of dependent eco- nomic development that has served as the basis for the commonwealth relationship is in crisis. James L. Dietz has described that crisis in precise terms as "the straining of the colonial ties" ("Puerto Rico in the 1970s and 1980s: Crisis of the Development Model," Association of Evolutionary Eco- nomics, Washington, 28-30 December 1981). At present, for both economic and political reasons, the commonwealth ar- rangement is under severe attack by an anti- colonialist majority, composed of 47 per- cent of the voters favoring statehood and 6 percent favoring independence. The third new element in the Puerto Rican situation has been the international pressures in favor of decolonization and in- dependence. Recent developments affect- ing relations between the United States and Latn American nations, such as the Mal- vinas War and others, have prompted coun- tries like Venezuela and Argentina to join in the efforts to bring the case of Puerto Rico to the full consideration of the UN General Assembly. Thus, the problem of Puerto Ricds relationship with the United States has acquired urgency. The collapse of the commonwealth economic model, the surge in pro-statehood sentiment, and the pres- sures in the international sphere for inde- pendence have all coalesced to make the issue of decolonization a crucial one in the 1980s. The issue of Puerto Rico's decolonization is a clash of paradigms. The metropolitan viewpoint is, in the words of Secretary of Interior Pedro San Juan during a recent visit to the Virgin Islands, that the United States "is not a colonial power." The viewpoint of the Puerto Rican elite is that the relationship is deficient and needs to be changed to satisfy the elite's aspiration of dignidad. The viewpoint of the island's masses is that the relationship with the United States is, regardless of its political formulation, a means of individual economic survival. There has been no common ground for the three paradigms to interrelate, much less to achieve consensus. There may still be US military impera- tives for colonialism. However, it is a ques- tion of attitudes that has prevented the solution to the colonial problem of Puerto Rico. The United States must solve the di- alectic between its democratic and imperial values. The Puerto Rican elite must decide whether it conceives itself as an intermedi- ary or as an actor in its island's history. Meanwhile, a veritable democratic revolt has been occurring among the masses. If it is thwarted, the issue of a potential violent decolonization of Puerto Rico may have to be faced. The time has come for the elaboration of an American policy on Puerto Rico. Such a policy must attempt to reconcile the as- sumptions and interests of the metropolis, the elite and the Puerto Rican masses. Such an effort must be directed at achieving a consensus among all sectors, factors and actors on a process that will lead to a final solution, one in which the American Con- gress clearly defines the options it is willing to consider, before the people of Puerto Rico are asked to vote and choose among alternative futures. The crisis has led to the recent trend in United States government circles favoring independence for Puerto Rico. It was the United States that invaded in 1898. It was the United States that granted American cit- izenship in 1917. It was the United States that enthroned the status quo after 1952. It is now time for the United States to decolo- nize: Make us equal or let my people go. El 12/CATfBBEAN r!e~vI Haiti's Dynastic Despotism From Father to Son to . . By William Paley here are certain enduring features of the Haitian past which must be taken into account in any attempt to explain the rise and progression of Duvalierism: the complex relationship between class and color, the importance of a classes inter- mediaire, and the role of the state. These factors are, of course, related, and taken together they provide a basis for under- standing and explaining recent events in the black republic. Color and Class In Haiti, as in other parts of the Caribbean, there is a broad coincidence between class and color, going back to the system of slav- ery in colonial days. In general, the blacks are poor and the lighter-skinned people are relatively rich. There are, of course, many exceptions but the general assumption is that if you are poor, you are likely to be black. Furthermore you are likely, and not entirely without justification, to ascribe your poverty to your color. Wealth is acquired by inheritance, by malversation and, occasion- ally, by enterprise or hard work. Hence, mulatto children inherit from their mulatto fathers. To acquire wealth by malversation normally requires literacy combined with political or bureaucratic power. Enterprise and hard work are effective only when cer- tain favorable conditions prevail, and these are set by individuals and groups who al- ready possess economic or political power. Throughout the nineteenth century, liter- acy and wealth were largely the preserve of a small elite composed mostly of mulattoes, although it included a few black families. Beyond this elite there was, however, a con- siderable class of peasants with medium- sized holdings. When members of this class managed to achieve high rank in the army, at a national or even at a local level, they were able to challenge the elite for political power, bringing with it the possibility of cor- ruption or patronage and a consequent im- provement in the long-term prospects for their families. Bitter divisions among the elite provided the opportunity for such William Paley lives and writes in Oxford, England. Papa Doc, Francois Duvalier, 1971. moves, when rival members of the elite would recruit support among this classes intermediaire. From colonial times, however, the over- whelming majority of blacks were poor. At- tempts by black politicians of the elite or of the classes intermediaire to secure their support were often made on the basis of color. Among the masses there was cer- tainly a deeply felt antipathy toward the mulattoes, who were identified tout court in the popular mind with the elite. Un- scrupulous politicians, however, exacer- bated the color issue for their own ends, and color became one of the factors determin- ing political alignments. Generally, only blacks resorted to the ex- plicit and public appeal to color loyalties. Mulattoes, as the leaders of the nineteenth- century Liberal Party, tended to avoid open discussion of the color question, preferring to justify their discriminatory actions in terms of "power to the most competent"; this, however, was little more than a thinly disguised appeal to color prejudices. The 1946 election slogan which called for a president who was "an authentic represen- tative of the masses" was, to be sure, also a disguised appeal to black loyalties, but noiriste politicians were less coy about ex- plicit reference to color than were their mulatto counterparts. Although color loyalties and antipathies have never been the sole factors in deter- mining political alignments, they have rarely been absent from political conflict in Haiti, and have, on occasions, been pre- dominant. Color became the most impor- tant factor affecting the formation of contending parties in a few crises which followed long periods of mulatto domi- nance. One such crisis was in 1844-47, fol- lowing 24 years of undisguised mulatto rule. The 1946 crisis followed a similar pe- riod of white (United States) and mulatto domination. The political propaganda of the 1946 election campaign revealed the continued importance of color in the politi- cal configurations of Haiti, and it is impossi- ble to understand the Duvalierist phe- nomenon without reference to it. Neverthe- less, to ascribe all divisions in Haiti to color factors would be an error only marginally less grave than to treat these factors as triv- ial. In most conflicts, color is one issue among many and frequently takes second place to economic class, regional loyalty or personal allegiance in determining the lines of battle. The Middle Classes The rural classes intermediare is com- posed of peasants with medium-sized holdings; they are in a position to offer occa- sional employment, to make loans and give credit to their poorer neighbors, and thereby to build a whole structure of dependence and patronage. In addition to owning land, many also act asspeculateurs-agents of coffee exporters-who buy from peasant producers in their region. Although in some areas there are a number of these specu- lateurs operating, the situation is not one of perfect competition. Each has built up a constituency based on financial depen- dence and even on affective ties; thespecu- lateur may be godfather to one of the small proprietor's children, and another child may be lodging at his house in the local town during school term. The small producer may thus have an obligation, customary as well as financial, to sell to a particular spec- CAPBBEAN r1-viw/13 ulateur rather than shop around on the open market for the one who will offer the best price. These middle classes, particu- larly in the countryside and in the small towns, formed the basis of cacos and piquet bands of irregulars, who played a vital role in political developments, particu- larly in the period leading up to the United States' invasion of 1915. The latter part of the nineteenth century saw the rise of an urban middle class of some significance. This class consisted mostly of members of black families who had managed-by luck, hard work, corrup- tion, or by rising through the ranks of the army-to achieve a level of literacy and edu- cation which enabled them to become school teachers, clerks, and civil servants, or to save enough money to establish them- selves in small businesses. They sometimes joined rural blacks or the urban proletariat to remove an unpopular government and to replace it with one thought to be more sym- pathetic to their interests. One of the most enduring consequences of the 19 years of US occupation was a decline in the signifi- cance of the countryside and provincial towns as power became centered in the capital. The rural classes intermediare consequently suffered a loss of influence, while its counterpart in the capital became a more crucial political force. With the depar- ture of the US Marines in 1934, the stability of the government of Stenio Vincent de- pended upon support from some key ele- ments of this class, and the collapse of the Lescot regime in 1946 is largely to be ex- plained by the hostility of the black urban middle class. The Role of the State An acquaintance once returned to his house on the outskirts of Port-au-Prince and could not find his servant. The man eventually appeared from behind some bushes. Asked what he had been doing, the servant replied, "I'etat te vini e m'cache" (literally, "the state arrived and I hid"). An army officer had arrived at the house, and the man's first thought was that this meant trouble. When European or North Ameri- can newspaper reports predicted the down- fall of Francois Duvalier's government on the grounds that it had done nothing for the people, they manifested a misunderstand- ing of Haitian history. The masses there have never had the expectation that the state would do any good for them. The state comes to confiscate, to tax, to prohibit or to imprison; consequently, the less seen of it the better. When the Haitian proverb says, "Apre bondie ce leta" (after God comes the state), it is not the goodness or the be- nevolence of God that people have in mind; it is rather his remoteness, his unpredic- tability and his power. Though the masses have no expecta- tions of welfare from the state, there is a small class which lives from state patron- age, or at least whose standard of living depends upon the political policies pursued by governments. This urban and suburban bourgeoisie needs foreign aid, trade and investment in order to maintain its priv- ileged position. Under certain circum- stances, the fate of a government might depend upon this class-although not the government of Fran;ois Duvalier. Duvalierist Support Francois Duvalier had a profound knowl- edge of the expectations and fears of the Haitian masses. His study of Haitian history and social structure, ethnological research and experience as a country doctor, com- bined with a shrewd and ruthless disposi- tion, made him a formidable politician. Throughout the country he built up a sys- tem of support based on the key role tradi- tionally played by the classes intermediary. Many of the local leaders whose support he secured were houngans (voudou priests), who had considerable influence in the com- munities where they operated. The country-wide organization of the Vol- ontaires de la Securite Nationale, the princi- pal tonton macoute organization, served not merely as an instrument of terror but also as a means of recruiting support for the regime. The leaders of the movement came from the class which had provided the backbone for the cacos and piquet bands of the preoccupation period. The noiriste rhetoric of the Duvalierist regime appealed to this class rather than to the very poor, and it was through this middle class that the government was able to control the masses. Duvalier recognized their crucial impor- tance and rarely tried to bypass them; rather he used the already existing structures of power to extend his control throughout the country. Whereas in the period prior to 1915 suc- cessful revolutions frequently began in the countryside, after the US invasion it was events in the capital that were decisive. Only during the election campaigns of 1946 and 1956-57 was there an apparent reversal of this trend. Once the election was over, how- ever, power reverted to Port-au-Prince. Cer- tain gestures were made by the govern- ments of Estim6 and Francois Duvalier in the direction of a rebirth of rural influence. The latter's electoral strength had been in the countryside and provincial towns, with powerful groups in the capital backing his opponents. The huge demonstrations in support of the regime which were organized in Port-au-Prince on such anniversaries as 22 October and 1 January were largely composed of rural Haitians transported in trucks to the city by local macoute leaders. What is significant is that while Duvalier's base of support may have been rural, it was essential to demonstrate this support in the capital-the seat of ultimate power. The growth of the tontons macoutes, many of whose leaders enjoyed a rural power base, is perhaps an aspect of the changing balance between capital and countryside. Neverthe- less this change should not be exaggerated, and although provincial macoute leaders enjoyed considerable local control, their ac- tivities were circumscribed by the president and they needed connections in the capital to exert national influence. Francois Du- valier's own rise to presidential office and his continued tenure depended to a great extent upon active endorsement by mem- bers of the classes intermediaire. The rural and urban black middle classes which formed the keystone of Francois Du- valier's power structure were not ac- customed to receiving many benefits from the state, and their loyalty could therefore be purchased at a modest price; they knew that they were unlikely to improve their lot by switching to opposition groups. Through- out the lean years of 1962-66, when foreign aid was practically cut off and the US gov- ernment and the Dominicans made deter- mined attempts to remove Duvalier from office, these middle-class leaders remained faithful to the regime-partly from fear and partly in the hope that things would im- prove. The class which suffered most from international pressure was the elite, which was, generally speaking, already hostile to- wards the government. Opposition Forces During the first years of his regime, Francois Duvalier had systematically reduced the po- litical power of all the major groups and institutions in the country; one by one the army officers, Roman Catholic hierarchy, US embassy, business elite, intellectuals and trade union leadership had their wings clipped. By 1966 Duvalier was in a strong enough position to be able to begin an ac- commodation with each of these former centers of power; it was, however, made quite clear to them that limited freedom to pursue their own ends did not include inter- ference in politics. It was now evident that the president did not seriously intend to eliminate the economic power of the mulatto elite, reduce the religious role of the Roman Catholic church, nor to move his country into the Soviet or nonaligned block, despite earlier hints to this effect. It ap- peared to be in the interests of these institu- tions to reach an agreement with Duvalier on his terms. In the cases of the church and the army, accommodation was facilitated by changes in leadership which Duvalier had effected, replacing a determined and powerful set of bishops and officers with more docile and compliant figures. By 1971 the opposition had effectively been eliminated through murder, imprison- ment or exile, and there remained no major group capable of constituting a center of political resistance or revolution. The 14/CAIBBEAN REVIEW groups discussed above decided that they could live with Duvalierism, and that at- tempts to improve their positions within the parameters of the system were preferable to the confusion which might result from revo- lution. Thus when Francois Duvalier died in April 1971, they were prepared to support a smooth transfer of power to his son. The Smooth Succession The generally held view, based on news- paper accounts, was that the regime of Francois Duvalier had no popular support and remained in office solely by a system of terror. This led to the confident prediction that the regime would fall on his death. In fact, although terror was widely used and was an indispensable requirement for sur- vival, it was not the whole story. Duvalier and his associates had carefully constructed a support structure throughout the country based on the Parti Unite Nationale and on the various macoute organizations. Although there was considerable hostility on the part of the masses to a number of the more ruthless macoute leaders, this hostil- ity did not seem to transfer to the president himself. There was the belief that if only he knew what was going on, he would take steps to remedy the situation. Constant propaganda, particularly on the radio, led to a widespread acceptance of the govern- ment and even to a belief in its benevolence. The paternal image of "Papa Doc," a figure possessing fearful power yet having a deep love for his people, was developed. At Du- valier's funeral, I personally witnessed nu- merous scenes of sadness and distress. We may well think that this popular attitude was illfounded and misplaced, but it did exist, and it is part of the explanation for the re- gime's survival. More important factors in accounting for the transition from father to son were the disabling of the opposition and the belief among important groups that a major dis- ruption of political life in Haiti would be against their interests. This attitude cer- tainly applied to the United States, the army leadership, the church hierarchy, and to much of the business community. Jean- Claude succeeded his father, but how far has he managed to maintain the power structure so carefully and ruthlessly con- structed throughout the 1960s? Young Jean-Claude Duvalier faced a number of serious difficulties on assuming office. The support system which had been built by his father was delicately balanced and needed continual adjustment. In partic- ular there was tension between the noiriste politicians and macoute leaders on the one hand, and the younger technocrats, who had been recruited more recently and were less committed to Duvalierist ideology, on the other. In addition, there were the preten- sions of ambitious businessmen and army officers to be watched. Relationships within the presidential family complicated the sit- uation; Francois Duvalier's widow was asso- ciated with a number of the old guard of noiristes, while one of her daughters was married to a leading army officer. To the surprise of foreign observers, the young president-under the tutelage of his mother-managed to hold the regime to- gether; and by astute moves curbing dan- gerous groups in the army and elsewhere, he ensured his survival. Although he had obviously learned much from his father, he lacked that intimate knowledge of Haitian social structure and dynamics that Papa Doc had acquired over many years. After a few years the president began to take action independently of his mother, putting into positions of power a number of individuals from the elite, whom he had met in his school days. These moves were resented by the old guard of Duvalierists, and Jean- Claude gradually lost touch with that impor- tant classes intermediare, upon which his father had relied. More and more he has sought support from the business community and from the younger technocrats, many of whom come from elite mulatto families. To secure for- eign aid it is necessary to have people in government who can "speak the right lan- guage"; such men, like Marc Bazin and Henri Bayard, are prepared to cooperate with the president only if they think it pays them to do so. Many of the younger technocrats were unwilling to collaborate with a government which included such notorious characters as Luckner Cambronne and other old- guard Duvalierists. They realized that the presence of such figures in positions of power ruined the cosmetic operation de- signed to convince the international com- munity that Haiti was a country deserving foreign aid and investment. The regime of President Carter in the US was prepared to back the efforts of these technocrats. His interest in human rights, together with a desire to keep Haiti in the "free world," led to considerable pressure being brought on Jean-Claude to liberalize his regime. Moderately independent journals, such as Petit Samedi Soir and Hebdo Jeune Presse, began to appear and cautiously criticize the administration, though care- fully avoiding suggestions that the presi- dent himself was responsible for any of Haiti's problems. Popular plays in creole were performed in the capital, pouring scorn on the administration of the country. Radio commentators broadcasting in cre- ole voiced outspoken attacks on the more scandalous aspects of government policy. By 1979, Sylvio Claude and Gregoire Eu- gene had formed their Christian Democrat Parties, and a non-Duvalierist had been elected to the legislative assembly. It was an extraordinary sight to behold newspapers and pamphlets openly critical of the govern- Baby Doc, Jean-Claude Duvalier, 1975. ment being sold on the streets. The liberal- ization of Duvalierism seemed to be in full swing. The volume of opposition had clearly worried the presidential entourage, and by a stroke of good fortune, a change of admin- istration in the United States coincided with a realization that unless something was done to clamp down on the opposition, the days of Jean-Claude were numbered. Presi- dent Reagan's concern for human rights was somewhat less palpable than that of his predecessor, and he was unprepared to risk good relations with a neighbor merely on the grounds that the courtesies expected by the US public at home were sometimes dis- pensed with abroad. Towards the end of November 1980, the clamp-down oc- curred. Opposition leaders were arrested, and others managed to flee to foreign em- bassies; Radio Haiti was destroyed; journals and newssheets disappeared from the streets. Migration Two aspects of Haitian foreign affairs are important in assessing prospects for the future. Both are consequences of the eco- nomic misery of the Haitian masses, exac- erbated by political oppression. The first is the migration of Haitian cane cutters to the Dominican Republic; the second is the rela- tively recent phenomenon of the "boat peo- ple" arriving in the United States. Rural Haitians have for many years migrated to other parts of the Caribbean to seek em- ployment in the cane fields. In the last half century, however, this has become a major feature of the sugar industry in the Dom- ninican Republic. Both the Dominican and Haitian governments have a financial inter- est in the system. The Dominican govern- ment, which owns much of the sugar industry, is eager to maintain a supply of cheap labor and pays the Haitian govern- ment a fee for each migrant. The cane cut- ters live in barrack-like buildings reminis- Continued on page 45 CAIBBEAN r~EIEw/15 Efficiency Versus Equity Economic Policy Options in the Caribbean By Fuat M. Andic Since 1945, expectations about ma- terial progress and well-being have become powerful social and politi- cal forces in countries where economic en- ergies have been long dormant. These countries, which we today refer to as Third World countries, have embraced industrial- ization as the way to enhance their material well-being. But material well-being and its increment is not, and cannot be, the sole objective of development. It is imperative that increases be simultaneously dis- tributed among the country's population in an equitable manner. In short, growth with equity is the prime objective of all less devel- oped countries (LDCs). In general terms, the recent past of the Caribbean has not varied greatly from that of other LDCs. There is little overall dif- ference between India and Barbados or Bra- zil and El Salvador. Yet LDCs are not identical, and no single country can be taken as a prototype, even when limiting discussion to those within the Caribbean basin. A certain degree of abstraction, how- ever, is indispensable if we are to reach even tentative conclusions about the policy op- tions available to these countries. The region has two characteristics which are crucial to consideration of growth with equity: the size of the economies and their degree of openness. The geographical ter- ritories are relatively small; the population base in many instances is less than one million; and practically all economies de- pend upon their exports. If we exclude a few products controlled by international agree- ments, such as bananas and sugar, the ex- ported goods have to face international competition. In other words, exported prod- ucts must be produced efficiently if they are to compete favorably in international mar- kets. Also, locally produced and consumed goods, so-called import substitution prod- ucts, must be produced efficiently if de- creased consumer welfare, and hence a decline in equity, is to be prevented. On the Fuat M. Andic is professor of economics (re- tired), University of Puerto Rico, and presi- dent-elect of the Caribbean Studies Association. whole, the efficiency criterion becomes a higher priority the more a country depends upon exports. On the other hand, equity cannot be ig- nored and must be maintained. It is part of the platforms of practically all political par- ties-to varying degrees, of course-and always figures in development plans. The question then is: can equity and efficiency be maintained in economies such as those in the Caribbean basin? If so, what are the trade-offs between the two? What are the policy options open to these countries? Let me begin briefly with the equity question. Equity Equity, or fairness, is perhaps the most widely used criterion in policy discussions. Government policies should be equitable in their effects on individuals. In a narrower sense, equity is taken as improvement in the distribution of incomes. This can be achieved either by improving the primary income distribution or by redistributing in- come through changes in taxes and expen- ditures to achieve, by some index of inequality, greater equity than would have occurred without redistribution. It is well known that income distribution is more unequal in the LDCs than in the de- veloped countries. The state of distribution in the Caribbean basin conforms with this general finding, and the degree of in- equality among its countries shows fairly wide variation. The Gini coefficient of the distribution of household incomes in seven countries is shown in the table. It varies from 0.369 in Barbados to 0.539 in El Sal- vador. Compare these coefficients with, for example, 0.338 in the United Kingdom or 0.333 in Canada, where the distribution of income is much more equitable (See table). Granted, such comparisons suffer from a number of conceptual and statistical diffi- culties which may render the effort rather frustrating. Nonetheless, the implication is clear: the primary distribution is unequal, and certain redistributional public policies are needed to improve distribution of in- comes among individuals and families. All political platforms in every Caribbean country, from the Partido Reformista of the Dominican Republic to the PNP of Jamaica, embrace the concept of redistribution and pursue the objective tenaciously with in- struments embedded in the tax and expen- diture sides of the budget. First there are progressive taxes, such as the personal income tax, which aim to re- duce the disparities between the rich and poor by taxing heavily the upper income brackets and transferring the receipts to the lower income groups or using the receipts to finance public services aimed at improv- ing the living standard of the poor. There is no country in the basin without a progres- sive income tax. But the tax system also contains tax reliefs which, on the whole, benefit the rich. Tax exemptions or tax holi- days prevail to encourage industrialization; favorable tax treatment of capital gains to encourage capital formation reduces the tax burden of the upper income groups. But people at the lower income levels do not necessarily pay their share of taxes either because of the relatively large rural agri- cultural population, evasion (also practiced by upper income groups), and lax enforce- ment. Thus, though vertical equity consid- erations may be legislated with good intentions in the form of progressive tax schedules, they never actually materialize. Moreover, sales and excise taxes and those on international trade, which provide the greatest portion of public revenue (for instance, 71% in Costa Rica, 67% in the Dominican Republic, 62% in Honduras and 57% in Jamaica), generally have a regres- sive effect as their burden falls more on the lower than on the upper income groups. In other words, tax systems do not have an appreciable impact on the redistribution process. Scanty though the studies of re- distribution in the Caribbean countries may be, they all attest to this point. In Puerto Rico, for example, the overall tax system is found to be basically proportional; and in Jamaica, even the direct taxes are regres- sive in the low-income groups. Similar con- clusions are reached in studies of redistribution in many other countries. The other side of the fisc's activity is pub- lic expenditures, specifically subsidies and transfers. These too are built into the bud- 16/CANBBEAN REVIEW gets of Caribbean countries to varying de- grees. A quick glance at the budget figures reveals that, for instance, Costa Rica, Ja- maica, El Salvador and Barbados allocate over 25 percent of their current outlays to subsidies and transfers. This action appears to be more conducive to income redistribu- tion than taxes. But we have to tread with extreme caution in this area, for the issues involved are much more complicated than they first appear. Take, for example, agri- cultural subsidy programs. Such programs raise the income of farmers, but also raise the cost of food to consumers. Or take cer- tain freely provided services and the bene- fits they bestow. We have no known measures to evaluate the quality or produc- tivity of such services, nor can we measure the benefits as perceived by the recipients. Hence, the redistributive effects of govern- ment expenditures may not be clear-cut. A third way to redistribute income is through regulation. This process has spread to more and more sectors of the economy over the years and has come to determine patterns of socioeconomic be- havior. Puerto Rico is an excellent example. The fiscal illusion characteristic of regula- tion has made it a perfect policy of re- distribution. With regulation, transfers are not explicitly registered as costs in the pub- lic accounting budget. Hence, the costs of regulation go unnoticed, while the benefits remain overt; the ratio of benefits to costs is therefore perceived to be higher. As a result, explicit tax and expenditure policies are easily replaced by regulation. But the ulti- mate effect of regulation on income dis- tribution has become almost impossible to determine. Over the years its benefits have spread over a large portion of the popula- tion and are no longer limited to a small and single group. In short, neither the tax system, the com- . plex effects of government expenditures on transfers and subsidies, nor regulatory ac- tivities unequivocally result in redistribution of incomes to favor the poor and thus en- hance equity. " Achieving equity through redistribution is further complicated by the fact that most . . Caribbean countries are committed to the Hemming T-shirts in a Puerto Rican factory. CAI?BBEAN rEV lW/17 Barry B. Levine shatters the myth of the victimized immigrant. BENJY LOPEZ A Picaresque Tale of Emigration and Return Using the first-person technique pioneered by Oscar Lewis, noted sociologist Barry B. Levine records and analyzes the life story of a Puerto Rican emigrant, "one of the most colorful characters to make an appearance in sociological literature... Barry Levine has that increasingly rare gift, the sociological ear. In this book, we have the result of his listening."-Peter Berger. "A labor of love for Puerto Rico and its plight, and a fine piece of scholarship."-Ed Vega, Nuestro "Levine has rescued Third World man from rniiglniry ... I believe that few works will better demonstrate the circumstances of the Puerto Rican in New York than this one."--Miquel Barnet, Caribbean Review "Highly recommended"-Joanna Walsh, Library Journal "Excellent.... "-Frank Fernandez, Revista Interamericana "Valuable Research, excellent writing"--Raymond E. Crist, Latin America in Books "Estupendo..."--Carlos Alberto Montaner, Spanish International Network "A rare work about the Puerto Rican diaspora..."-Gerald Guinnes, Americas "Interesting and refreshing..."- Aaron Segal, Times of the Americas. "Opens the reader's eyes to the problems and challenges, the pain and frustration of life as a Puerto Rican in the big metropolis."-Joseph P Fitzpatrick, S.J., Contemporary Sociology "A good read... but above and beyond its literary attributes, it stands on its own as a well- conceived, thoroughly researched, and solid study.. .A significant contribution to the scientific analysis of the causes and consequences of Puerto Rican emigration and return."-Angel Calderbn Cruz, Caribbean Studies "A stupendous book that only a sociblogist/anthropologist willing and unafraid to let a little humanism and common sense creep into his study could write. A very human document about a very human being."-Gary Brana-Shute, Bijdragen tot de Taal-, Land- en Volkenkunde. $9.95 direct from Waterfront Press WATERFRONT PRESS 52 Maple Avenue Maplewood, New Jersey 07040 Please write for our full catalogue of books in the area of Puerto Rican studies. democratic political system of which the budget process is a part. The argument here is that a democratic decision-making process is inherently not conducive to effec- tive redistribution policies. First, the fre- quency distribution of the voters along the income scale is not identical to the fre- quency distribution of the actual voters. Rather, the rate of participation in elections increases with the income level. Moreover, information is not uniformly diffused and is available in greater amounts and more af- fordable to higher income groups than to lower ones. As a result, a policy of redistribu- tion in favor of the poor may not necessarily emerge. Second, elections take place at specified intervals; the electorate is pre- sented with a limited number of aggregated alternatives and a single program, and sim- ple majority rule prevails. The probability of considering a great number of voter prefer- ences is thereby reduced; and whether or not a redistributive policy is implemented, and to what extent, depends not on voter behavior as such but on totally different factors. Is Equity Attainable? These brief remarks lead one to conclude that not much redistributive effect can be expected from existing government pol- icies. What then should be the proper focus on inequality and its reduction when re- distribution proves to be politically imprac- tical and the redistributive programs themselves are judged to have but imper- ceptible effects? We need a novel approach to the prob- lem. I believe we should place emphasis on improving the primary distribution of in- come. If we accept the premise that labor incomes are by far the most unequal, then education and technological training be- come important instruments in reducing income inequality. Changes in technology expand the demand for highly skilled labor with advanced educational levels. As a re- sult, the equilibrium wage rate for highly educated labor rises relative to that for less educated labor, and inequality between the two will widen unless the educational com- position of the labor force changes. Hence, inequality can decrease only if the expan- sion in education overtakes that required by technological development. The policy implication of this stand is that to provide information about the resources for exploiting available opportunities, effec- tive measures should be pursued: improved schooling for the poor, improved public health care, assistance with educational costs (loan finance), provision of early di- rective career counseling and information on job alternatives, assistance in financing occupational mobility, among others. Edu- cational and research and development programs should be designed so that the differential growth between the supply of 18/CAI?BBEAN REVIEW and demand for educated manpower is minimized and education is available to all who want it and are worthy of it. The focus is on improving the primary distribution of incomes. This focus does not deny the role of budget policy in reducing existing inequality, but it does recognize that such policy is not the most effective way to realize distributive justice, however de- fined. That poverty exists is a reality which cannot be waved aside. Hence until and unless society effectively provides oppor- tunities, targeted antipoverty programs will have to exist. The electorate does not reject the implementation of such programs to Experience so far indicates that heavy protection of industries has created imbalances and misallocation of resources in the Caribbean. improve the position of the less well-to-do, as evidenced by the number currently in force, regardless of whether or not they im- prove overall income distribution. There may be disagreement on whether too much or too little is being provided, and the pro- grams may be criticized for misallocating the resources and thereby adversely affect- ing cultural behavior patterns. While we are trying to correct the undesirable features of these programs, we should be embarking more and more on action to ensure equality of training and opportunity. In short, to improve primary distribution and make it more equitable is of crucial importance. It is also the more efficient and cost-effective approach, and the impact is more easily measurable. Therefore, small economies such as those of the Caribbean should direct their planning efforts towards that end. Efficiency Economic efficiency is easier for econo- mists to define but more difficult to attain. Using the Pareto optimality criterion, we say that the economy is functioning efficiently when there is no scope for change in re- source allocation for further improvement in anyone's welfare, unless some people benefit at the expense of others. Adhering to the strictest definition of effi- ciency, that is, optimum utilization of re- sources, experience so far indicates that heavy protection of industries has created imbalances and misallocation of resources in the Caribbean. Such indiscriminate pro- tection in countries like the Dominican Re- public, Jamaica and Puerto Rico has given rise to biases against agriculture and ser- vice industries and hence has limited overall growth. This stems from the fact that the cost of inputs of nonindustrial sectors rose sharply while the cost of capital relative to labor declined. And yet the whole Carib- bean suffers from high unemployment. It is quite common to find rates of 10-15 per- cent, with even higher rates of 35 percent observed in Grenada (1980), 26 percent in Jamaica (1981) and 25 percent in the Do- minican Republic (1979). The bias of incentives in favor of capital- intensive industries has led to heavy bor- rowing and burdened many countries be- yond their foreign exchange capacity. Specifically, in those countries where man- ufacturing was based on import-substitut- ing activities and/or assembly operations for export, a heavy import dependency arose. For example, during the last decade or so, Costa Rica had to import 80 cents' worth of intermediate goods to be able to export one dollar's worth of finished prod- uct. And this is not an isolated case. Even occasional foreign exchange difficulties create havoc in the industrial sector, as, for example, in Jamaica. Bottlenecks, idle ca- pacity and unemployment ensue. Heavily subsidized or protected industries lead to other or secondary inefficiencies. Re- sources are attracted to urban centers, cre- ating regional imbalances in addition to a host of socially undesirable effects. To redress the inefficiencies stemming from import substitution, heavy protection and subsidies, some countries have turned their emphasis to export-oriented indus- tries. Efficiency and growth through the ex- ploitation of economies of scale followed. There are several examples of this turn- about in Latin America and the Caribbean. But for many countries this simply meant the same type of incentives with a different bias, yielding the same result: discrimina- tion against the rest of the economy. One must recognize that there is no magic formula for attaining optimal effi- ciency. Despite the abundance of theoreti- cal discussions, we still know very little about the efficient or optimal paths of in- dustrial growth. Actual experience in the LDCs varies from the completely open ap- proach on the one extreme, to a controlled approach on the other. One finds practically all the basin countries and a host of other LDCs within these extremes. Meaningful generalizations are yet to come. In industrial planning, each country has to devise pol- icies that are compatible with its particular socio-politico-economic conditions. Given these conditions, it is an accomplishment just to recognize the inefficiencies that a particular objective or set of policies may create at the time plans are being formu- lated. In the final analysis, the decision maker may choose to disregard them. Al- though the plan is a technical document, it is not independent of political considera- tions which may force the decision maker to forgo efficiency considerations. It is an achievement, however, to know what we are forgoing. Efficiency Versus Equity To review, equity means improved income distribution. In a broader sense it implies breaking the vicious cycle of poverty, ex- tending the fruits of development to all sec- tors of the society, or achieving social development. Some countries have be- come so obsessed with growth and indus- trialization in their early development process that they have tended to neglect its underlying objective-social development. And those countries that have designed pol- icies with a heavy emphasis on social devel- opment (such as Costa Rica or Jamaica) now find themselves with very inefficiently operating industrial sectors. These recent experiences lie at the heart of the question of whether equity and efficiency are in fact attainable simultaneously, or whether one need be sacrificed for the other. In my mind this is a false dichotomy and merits further attention. That there are trade-offs cannot be denied. An excessive concentration of small-scale enterprises, heavily labor-intensive and dispersed into the countryside, can no doubt be damaging to efficiency. But heavily subsidized capital- intensive industries are not free of problems either, and unsatisfactory social develop- ment is one of them. It should not be forgot- ten that even with a labor-intensive structure, job creation in manufacturing is a slow process. To rely on industrial develop- ment alone to enhance equity obviously cannot be the only choice. Granted, indus- trialization and the alleviation of poverty are complementary. A certain degree of equity can be achieved, provided that industrialization focuses on efficient production of mass- consumption goods with an appropriate choice of technique. In turn, the structure of manufacturing itself will be influenced by policies to distribute income more equita- bly and by the provision of public (as well as private) goods. But to expect that one nec- essarily leads to the other is somewhat naive. Efficiency obeys a host of different rules; being competitive, choosing appro- priate techniques, and benefitting from transfers of technology are among them. These can be readily incorporated into in- dustrial planning. Some elements of equity policy can also be incorporated into indus- trial policy, such as a modern and vigorous manufacturing sector concomitant with a more traditional small-scale sector. While the latter becomes a holding sector for la- bor, the former becomes a provider of in- dustrial goods and inputs that increase the totality of goods available for consumption, for intermediate use, and exports. By and large, however, equity can best be achieved through policies other than indus- trial development. From the planning point of view, the question is not whether or not the two objectives are compatible, but rather which criterion should have the higher pri- ority. This is a choice to be made by deci- sion makers. If in the final analysis one is forced to make a general statement, I would venture to say that it is preferable to prepare a devel- opment plan which is efficient, with a clear statement of its impact on equity considera- tions. It is easier to take counteracting mea- sures in other spheres of the economy to ensure equity than it is to take measures to correct inefficiencies in the industrial sector. The measures to assure equity will have to be found primarily in education and training, and other concomitant programs which provide the resources to exploit avail- able opportunities. An integrated set of overall and sectoral plans is desirable in all LDCs, including the very small open econo- mies of the Caribbean basin. In the alloca- tion of public revenue for government expenses, a proper balance must be struck between productive and nonproductive ex- penditures. It should not be forgotten in this connection, however, that education repre- sents an investment in the only reliable resource of our small countries: our people. O CA,?BBEAN rEViEW/19 Gini Coefficients Selected Caribbean Countries Barbados ............................................. 0.369 Costa Rica ........................................... 0.376 Dominican Republic .................................... 0.493 El Salvador ............................................. 0.539 Guyana ................................................. 0.420 Jamaica ......... ..................................... 0.476 Puerto Rico............................................. 0.420 Source: Shail Jain, Size Distribution of Income. Washington, D.C.: The World Bank, 1975. First-Time Anthropology and History Among the Saramaka By Richard Price THE SARAMAKA--about twenty thousand people-live in the heavily forested interior of the Republic of Suriname in northeastern South America. Their ancestors were among those Africans who were sold into slavery in the late seventeenth and early eighteenth centuries to work Suriname's sugar, timber, and coffee plantations. They soon escaped into the dense rain forest-individually, in small groups, sometimes in great collective rebellions-where for over one hundred years they fought a war of liberation. In 1762, a full century before the general emancipation of slaves in Suriname, they won their freedom. In a sacred grove beside the village of Dangog6, shaded by equatorial trees, stands a weathered shrine to the Old- Time People (Aw6n&nge), those ancestors who "heard the guns of war." Whenever there is a collective crisis in the region- should the rains refuse to come on time or an epidemic sweep the river-it is to this shrine that Saramakas repair. As libations of sugarcane beer moisten the earth beneath newly raised flags, the Old-Time People are one by one invoked-their names spoken (or played on the apinti drum), their deeds recounted, their foibles recalled, and the drums/dances/songs that they once loved performed to give them special pleasure. Literally thousands of individual Saramakas must have heard the guns of war between the 1680s and the coming of the Peace in 1762. Yet the names invoked at Aw6nenge number merely in the scores. All history is thus: a radical selection from the immensely rich swirl of past human activity. The uniqueness of First-Time lies in its taking seriously the selection that is made by those people who gather together at this Excerpted from Richard Price, First-Time: The Historical Vision of an Afro-American People, Johns Hopkins University Press (hardcover $25.00, paperback $12.95). Copyright 1983 by Richard Price. Reprinted by permission of the publisher. Richard Price is professor and chairman, Department of Anthropology, Johns Hopkins University. shrine. It is about those distant people and those long-ago events that Saramakas to- day choose to think about, talk about, and act upon; but it is also about the ways that Saramakas transform the general past (ev- erything that happened) into the significant past, their history. First-Time is an attempt to communicate something of the Saramakas' own special vision of their for- mative years. Saramakas are acutely conscious of liv- ing in history, of reaping each day the fruits of their ancestors' deeds, and of themselves possessing the potential, through their own acts, to change the shape of tomorrow's world. All evil, they believe, originates in human action, which makes Saramaka his- toricity a two-way street. Not only does each misfortune, illness, or death stem from a specific past misdeed, but every offense, whether against people or gods, bears someday its bitter fruit. The ignoble acts of the dead intrude daily on the lives of the living, who must learn to accept them and to handle the evils they engendered. Any illness or misfortune calls for divination, which quickly reveals the specific past act that caused it. And in the lengthy process of making things right once more, the ances- tors speak, the gods dance, and the past comes alive, palpable and visible. For Saramakas today, First-Time (f/si- ten)-the era of the Old-Time People-dif- fers most sharply from the recent past in its overwhelming inherent power. Stretching roughly to 1800, First-Time is not more "mythologized" or less accurately recalled than the more recent past; but knowledge of First-Time is singularly circumscribed, re- stricted, and guarded. It is the fountainhead of collective identity; it contains the true root of what it means to be Saramaka. Once Ameika, a man in his seventies, remarked in my presence: "First-Time kills people. That's why it should never be taught to youths .... That's why, when you pour a libation at the ancestor shrine, you must be careful about speaking in proverbs [because you may not be aware of all their hidden implications]. There are certain [people's] names that, if you call them, you're dead right on the spot! There are names that can't be uttered twice in the course of a whole year! It is with such things that we were raised." The imminent danger of First-Time re- sides, in part, in its specialized uses in social action. The recent past (roughly the last hundred years) that intrudes on everyday life tends to affect only individuals, domes- tic groups, and, occasionally, whole village units. First-Time, though called upon less frequently, relates to larger and older collec- tivities, most often the "clans" (16) that trace their ancestry matrilineally back to an origi- nal group of rebel slaves. First-Time most often comes alive in the restricted but highly charged arena of interclan politics. It was the migratory movements of the First-Time people that established land rights for pos- terity; it is the details of how they held politi- cal office that provide the model on which modern succession is based; and it is the particular alliances and rivalries among the wartime clans that shape the quality of their descendants' interaction today. Any dispute between clans-whether over land, political office, or ritual possessions-immediately brings knowledge of First-Time to the fore. In these settings, when corporate property and prestige are at stake, such knowledge becomes highly perspectival; the point of knowing about a First-Time event is to be able to use it in support of one's clan. First-Time provides the "charter," as well, for the most powerful ritual possessions of each clan, many of which date back to that formative period. Learning the details of their history provides an unmatched degree of personal security, for one need thereafter never be alone: the Old-Time People and their enormous powers will be standing by one's side. The Saramaka Historian The pursuit of First-Time knowledge is a strictly solitary endeavor, and in any clan the number of older men considered really to "know things" can be counted on a single hand. (Women and youths, with few excep- tions, are prohibited a priori from entering deeply into the world of First-Time knowl- edge.) Within any clan, each expert's knowl- edge is idiosyncratic, learned from a unique 20/CAffBBEAN e vmiE network of older kinsmen and reflecting that individual's particular strengths as a historian. Over the course of his adult life- time, each interested man must construct his own images and analyses of "what really happened" two and three centuries ago, based on bits and pieces of relevant songs and rites, disputes, and celebrations that he makes it his business to attend to, as well as on the supplementary narratives he is able to wheedle out of his often-reluctant older kinsmen. The Saramaka historian-in-train- ing hoes a very long row; those that take it on as a vocation, like the very finest of our own historians, seem positively driven by an inner need to make sense of the past, quite apart from the prestige that may incidentally accrue from their special mastery. First-Time knowledge is a valuable com- modity, and those who possess pieces of it share them only sparingly with others. Question-asking about First-Time was tra- ditionally prohibited. As Peleki-a middle- aged Matjau clan man then being groomed as a possible successor to Tribal Chief Ab6ik6ni-explained: "Asking about things in detail simply did not occur. The old folks would tell you things. You just sat there with- out a sound, listening. And that was all." The research procedures of the appren- tice Saramaka historian (like those of his Western counterpart) include a good deal of plain sitting (often after having traveled a considerable distance for the privilege). "First-Time things," Peleki once mused to me, "don't have only one head .... Your ears musttruly growtired of the thing before you will really know it." Cock's crow, with an older man speaking softly to a younger kinsman: this is the clas- sic Saramaka setting for the formal trans- mission of First-Time knowledge. (Cock's crow is the hour or two that precedes dawn, when most villagers are still asleep in their hammocks.) Although the bulk of any man's First-Time knowledge is in fact pieced together from more informal set- tings-from overheard proverbs and epi- thets, from songs and discussions of land tenure-discreetly prearranged cock's crow discussions are, conceptually, the epitome of First-Time learning. It is at such times Agbag6 (Ab6ik6ni), Tribal chief of the Saramaka since 1951. that a captain is supposed to instruct a po- tential successor, a grandfather his grand- son, or a mother's brother his sister's son. Indeed, the standard phrase with which a Saramaka denies knowledge of First-Time is "I never sat down with oldfolks at cock's crow." The knowledge transmitted at cock's crow is deliberately incomplete, masked by a style that is at once elliptical and obscure. It is a paradoxical but accepted fact that any Saramaka narrative (including those told at cock's crow with the ostensible intent of communicating knowledge) will leave out most of what the teller knows about the incident in question. A person's knowledge is supposed to grow only in very small in- crements, and in any aspect of life people are deliberately told only a little bit more than the speaker thinks they already know. Those Times Shall Come Again Saramaka collective identity is predicated on a single opposition: freedom versus slavery. The central role of First-Time in Saramaka life is ideological; preservation of its knowledge is their way of saying "Never again." As I overheard one man reminding another, "If we forget the deeds of our an- cestors, how can we hope to avoid being returned to whitefolks' slavery?" Or, in the memorable words of Peleki, speaking at the time to me, "This is the one thing Maroons really believe. It's stronger than anything else. ... This is the greatest fear of all Ma- roons: that those times [slavery and the struggle for freedom] shall come again." "Those times," as Saramakas are well aware, refers to the harshest realities. Ma- roons recaptured by the colonists were rou- tinely "punished" by hamstringing, am- putation of limbs, and a variety of deaths by torture. To cite but one eighteenth-century example, a recaptured Maroon, "whose punishment shall serve as an example to others," was sentenced "to be quartered alive, and the pieces thrown in the River. He was laid on the ground, his head on a long beam. The first blow he was given, on the abdomen, burst his bladder open, yet he uttered not the least sound; the second blow with the axe he tried to deflect with his hand, but it gashed the hand and upper belly, again without his uttering a sound. The slave men and women laughed at this, saying to one another, 'That is a man!' Fi- nally, the third blow, on the chest, killed him. His head was cut off and the body cut in four pieces and dumped in the river." CARBBEAN rEVIEW/21 4 I I IAOVULIII VI i-V ,-1 IU r I Iy 1 LI I n Flc- .r For Saramakas today, talk about First- Time is very far from being mere rhetoric, preserved for reasons of nostalgic pride. Rather, First-Time ideology lives in the minds of twentieth-century Saramaka men because it is relevant to their own life experi- ence-it helps them make sense, on a daily basis, of the wider world in which they live. For more than a century now, every Saramaka man has spent many years of his life in coastal Suriname earning money by logging, construction work, and other forms of low-paid wage labor. There, he meets bakaas- "outsiders," white and black-who treat him in ways that he fits comfortably into a First-Time ideological framework. Asipei, a dignified man in his sixties, described an incident that may ap- propriately stand here for dozens of similar ones I heard recounted. When he was a boy, visiting the city with his mother's brother, an urban Afro-Surinamer derisively called him a "monkey," to which his uncle replied an- grily but with pride: "Where you live, you pay to drink water, you pay to have a place to shit; but in the forest where I live, I drink the finest water in the world whenever I like, I defecate at my leisure." For all those re- spected Saramaka historians or ritual spe- cialists, for all those renowned woodcarvers or dancers who are forced by economic necessity (and lack of Western schooling) to clean out toilet bowls in the French mis- sile-launching base at Kourou, First-Time ideology cannot but remain a powerful rele- vant force. And for all Saramakas, the recent construction of the great hydroelectric pro- ject (that flooded fully half of the lands their ancestors had fought and died for, and that caused the forced resettlement of thou- sands of their people) represented an ex- pectable continuation of the kind of behavior that their First-Time ancestors routinely suffered at the hands of the bakaas. Continuities of oppression, from original enslavement and torture to modern political paternalism and economic exploi- tation, have been more than sufficient to keep First-Time ideology a living force. The fear of group betrayal, forged in slav- ery and the decades of war, remains a corn- erstone of the Saramaka moral system. Proverbs and folktales are filled with morals about not trusting other people, and self- defensive posturing and manipulation per- meate interpersonal relations. An an- thropologist who has lived with the Aluku, a neighboring Maroon group, describes a "layer of spurious culture," which they have "created to shield [their] custom from the outside world," and notes that in their deal- ings with outsiders they "have made a high art of institutionalized prevarication." It is for these reasons that until recently many vil- lage names recorded on official maps of Saramaka were either obscene expressions or the names of nearby cemeteries. And Saramaka men spend hours swapping sto- ries of personal experiences they have had on the coast regarding what Afro-Ameri- cans in the United States used to call "put- tin' on ol' massa." The core meaning of many Saramaka folktales, and the heart of Saramaka morality, is that knowledge is power, and that one must never reveal all of what one knows. And this holds doubly for First-Time, and with outsiders. Fieldwork For some two years in the mid-1960s, Sally Price and I lived in Saramaka, carrying out ethnographic fieldwork on an unusually wide range of issues, from "social structure" and "religion" to "language" and "art." Only one subject was explicitly forbidden, from our earliest encounters with the oracle of Gaan Tata right up to the week of our final departure-First-Time. I diligently avoided systematic exploration of the distant past (though it greatly interested me and though its emanations were everywhere around me) as part of holding up my end of the fieldwork bargain that we had struck with our hosts. During the subsequent years, as a fledg- ling professor at Yale and Johns Hopkins, I learned more about the early history of Afro-Americans, in particular Maroons, elsewhere in the hemisphere. And I decided to try to persuade Saramakas to explore First-Time in depth with me. When I broached the possibility, on brief trips in 1974 and 1975, I was sufficiently encour- aged to proceed. In one sense, the elder Saramakas I knew best had always ex- pected me to work on First-Time; how else could I become a man of knowledge? Nev- ertheless, they expected me to do it only when I was ready-when they thought I was ready-and the time now seemed right. During much of our first two years in Saramaka, we had posed an enormous threat to our hosts, far more than we realized at the time. Many truly believed that we had come to kill them on the spot; others be- lieved that we had come to learn their se- crets so that we could bring great armies to destroy them; and all of our hosts knew that our presence, in spite of the frequent rituals to which they subjected us, might suffi- ciently anger the gods and ancestors so that they would wreak wholesale destruction upon them. As Captain Kala used to pray at the ancestor shrine, during those early days of our stay, "Whitefolks have never come to Dangog6. The ancestors always said whites must never come as far as Dangog6. No outsider [black or white] has ever slept in Dangog6. The Old-Time People simply cannot "see" whitefolks. The war we fought, it's not finished yet .... What in the world are we to do with these people? I have never buried a white person. If they die, how will I know how to bury them?" Yet eventually our initially reluctant hosts were seeing us, at least much of the time, as individual human beings with our own idio- syncratic personalities, and not just as "whitefolks." And there was a widespread- if sometimes grudging-respect for the way that we took pains to conduct ourselves in everyday life. As the tribal chief said in his parting speech to us in 1968, Sally had not committed adultery and had strictly held to the menstrual taboos; I had hunted and fished like a real man, sharing with our neighbors. We hadn't walked where we had been told not to (the shrine for the First- Time ancestors, the upriver site of the First- Time villages) and I hadn't talked about what I wasn't supposed to (First-Time). Given the historical circumstances, we felt that we had been treated with considerable grace and generous hospitality. We also felt that we had made several lifelong friends, a feeling that time has since borne out. By our return to Suriname in the mid- 1970s, the world of Upper River Saramaka, where we had lived for two years, had changed. Government officials or tourists dropped in and out of the once-isolated villages almost on a monthly basis, film crews occasionally came and went, Saramaka men often wore long pants in the villages, and people were listening to radios and spending considerable time on the coast in the capital. I too had changed: I was now a professor and chairman of a depart- ment rather than a student; I was known to be an "authority" for outsiders on Saramaka life (Saramakas had been given copies of the books and papers I had written); and I was considered to be in a position to help them in various ways with outside officials. Our earlier stay-the social relations it in- volved, the fears it raised-had by now be- come in some sense part of Dangog6's past; a new chapter was beginning. While we had once been objects of fear and con- cern, we were now, at least for many Saramakas, honored guests. 22/CAI?BBEAN PEV E1 My own activities in Saramaka shifted significantly between the initial fieldwork of the 1960s and the 1976 and 1978 research seasons (when I obtained most of the spe- cific oral material forFirst-Time). While be- fore I had spent considerable time in hunting, attending oracle sessions, and participating in other tasks appropriate for a man of my age, I now worked singlemind- edly on First-Time, seeking out selected el- ders for private conversation. With the knowledge and approval of Tribal Chief Ab6ik6ni, Captain Kala, and the other Ma- tjau clan elders who had become, in a sense, our spiritual guardians, I began work with men who had known me (at least by reputation) from the previous decade. Be- cause of knowledge I had since gleaned from written sources, I was now in a position to offer Saramaka historians a most pre- cious gift, new information about their own early past. After an additional research year in the Netherlands in 1977-78, much of it spent in the Algemeen Rijksarchief, my store of First-Time information had increased enor- mously, enough so that even without offer- ing much in the way of specifics, I now possessed a considerable reputation as a historian among knowledgeable Sara- makas. An exchange of information be- came, for some old men, the principal motive for "sitting down" with me; and not only did I know original whitefolks' views on First-Time events, but I was fast building up a storehouse of Saramaka knowledge about the period that in its breadth ex- ceeded the knowledge of any single Saramaka. Fortunately, the growth of my own knowledge coincided with an indepen- dent realization by some elders that knowl- edge of First-Time (at least the nonritual parts of it) had better be written down soon or else be lost forever. Indeed, at a 1978 gathering (kuutu) in the tribal chief's re- ception hall, I was asked on behalf of the Matjau clan to write such a book for them; flattered with a characteristic rhetorical dec- laration that I was now a Matjau, I was for- mally asked to be their official chronicler. It was this kind of official approval, which contrasted so strikingly with the explicit pro- hibitions of the 1960s on my discussing First-Time at all, that permitted me to pro- ceed. Nonetheless, it did not really make any easier the act of eliciting First-Time knowledge from wary elders, as people very much kept their own counsel about how much, and exactly what, they wished to share with me. All of my discussions with Saramakas about First-Time must be firmly situated in their basic ideological context: "First-Time kills," "Never tell another more than half of what you know," and "Those times [the days of war, the days of white- folks' slavery] shall come again." The methods of work imposed by practi- cal considerations ruled out most tradi- tional modes of historical transmission; I could not, like a Saramaka, simply wait a lifetime and piece together what I had seen and heard. I had to seek people out, explain myself, and actively persuade them to share information, with little to offer except my own historical knowledge, compensation for their time (in money or, if they preferred, in "gifts"), and the excitement of joint dis- coveries-for some the most important in- ducement of all. I had to keep telling myself, as the Saramaka hunting proverb says, that "if you don't stir up a hole, you won't find out what's inside"; but I could never afford to forget its cautionary counterpart: "If you shake a dry tree, you'd better watch out for your head." With the men I worked with most often, I developed various routines that helped ease for both of us the basic inappropriate- ness of the enterprise. I soon realized, for example, that the great historian Tebini was not fully comfortable speaking about First- Time while looking directly at me; so I worked with him in the presence of one or another younger kinsman whom Tebini could formally address as he spoke. Having a third party present in my discussions with Tebini turned out to be helpful in other ways as well. Rhetorically, it provided the neces- sary "answerer" who could lend the speaker full attention (since I was often scribbling and working hard to digest what I was hear- Continued on page 46 CAf BBEAN reVIEW/23 SJournal of -191 Geography Editor: Anthony R. de Souza Department of Geography, University of Wisconsin-Eau Claire Eau Claire, WI 54701, USA Published by the National Council for Geographic Education The Journal of Geography is the leading U.S. publication dedicated to the strengthening of the teaching of geography at all levels. It alerts teachers to recent developments in geography by publishing updating articles in all corners of the field. Additionally, the Journal serves the interests and needs of teachers by publishing didactical materials. The Journal of Geography is published bimonthly. It may be obtained on sub- scription from the National Council for Geographic Education, Western Illinois University, Macomb, IL 61455, U.S.A. Price is $29.00 (single issues $4.00). Articles and materials for consideration should be sent to the editor. PROBLEMS OF DEVELOPMENT IN BEA UTIFUL COUNTRIES PERSPECTIVES ON THE CARIBBEAN Ransford W. Palmer Professor of Economics, Howard University Can industrialization in the Caribbean absorb the region's surplus labor? Has emigration to the United States helped Caribbean development? Can U.S. policy toward the Caribbean help the region achieve economic self-reliance? Professor Palmer provides a lucid examination of these and other questions of major importance to the economic survival of the Commonwealth Caribbean in the decades ahead. $12.50 THE NORTH-SOUTH PUBLISHING CO. P.O. Box 610, Lanham, Maryland 20706 Price in U.S. dollars. Prepaid orders shipped postpaid. Anansi Folk Culture An Expression of Caribbean Life By Althea V. Prince Anansi stories feature the Akan spider- hero, creolized in the Caribbean to become the counterpart of the anti- hero in the calypso. Anansi almost always gets the better of a situation through cun- ning, which he uses to make up for the physical strength, material wealth and high status which he lacks: "One day Tiger fell into a pit and could not get out for several days. He finally managed to get hold of a tree branch and was about to pull himself out when Anansi happened to pass by. Anansi was worried because he had heard about Tiger's fall and knew that by now Tiger would be so hungry that he would eat the first thing he got his hands on. He knew he couldn't run fast enough to get away from Tiger, so he decided to work his head [use his brain]. Anansi called down to Tiger: A, A Bredder Tiger, you nah hungry?' Tigersaid, Yes man, an' ah go eat you when ah come out.' Tiger started to climb out using the branch to pull himself out and Anansi began to get more worried. He shouted to Tiger again, 'Bredder Tiger you lucky you gettin'out eh man?' Tiger said, 'Mm hm'; Anansi said, An you does tank God for all you food?' Yes,'said Tiger 'You doesn't put you hands together when you pray?' asked Anansi. 'But sure, ah always pray with me hands like this,' answered Tiger; and so saying, he dropped the tree branch and clasped his hands together in prayer. Of course, he promptly fell back into the pit, andAnansi took off as fast as he could." It should be explained at this point that several Anansi stories are about conflict be- Sociologist Althea V Prince is presently doing research in her native Antigua. tween Anansi and Tiger-Tiger being the bigger and stronger, yet Anansi almost al- ways winning the battle of wits. The forego- ing story demonstrates Anansi's ability to survive the most hazardous danger and emerge the victor, even though all the odds are against him. It also shows that Anansi is not about to abandon survival attempts even though all seems hopeless. He stays alive at all costs. He cannot do so through the use of weapons, for he has none; he cannot bribe Tiger with money, for he has none; what he does have is his wits and he puts them to good use to assure his survival. Anansi also usually comes out victorious in situations with his family, dogs, fish, cats, and other domestic and "bush" animals. His wins are always achieved through cun- ning, never through brawn or the use of material goods or weapons. For example: "One day, Anansi decided to go and look for food for his family because there was a famine in the land. Everyone was hungry and no one had money or food to eat. Anansi managed to 'scrounge' nine ripe figs [bananas] which were just enough for his wife and eight children to get one each. He took them home, gave them one each and said, 'see how good I am to all you. Ah only have nine fig and ah give all a'you one and now I lef wid nutten. Is so I does tink bout all you all de time.' His family felt very guilty and insisted on di- viding their figs with Anansi. Each child gave him half a fig as did his wife. So Anansi had four and a half ripe figs in the end." Even his family is not exempt from Anansi's cunning. He is hungry and he will eat, even if it means tricking his family out of the biggest share. He could have easily eaten all of the bananas and gone home empty-handed-but that would have been amoral, which Anansi is not. What the story does demonstrate, however, is that Anansi is interested in himself first: he is self-inter- ested, but not amoral. The imagery in Anansi has a direct corre- spondence to "Nobody Go Run Me," a ca- lypso by Short Shirt, the most popular Antiguan calypsonian. It is alleged that in response to an order by the government to cease squatting on government land, he composed the following: "I have my axe to grind / Just like any other man /Existing in poverty / On this giant ghetto land / But I intend to hang on / Tell them, tell them for me / No Dice / Iain goin to eat lice / Iain goin to grow old / Sittin in the cold / Not me, Shorty [Short Shirt] / No Way / They goin have to beat me / They goin have to eat me / Or they heads go roll. "Tell them Isay I was born in this land /I go die in this land / Nobody go run me / From where me come from / Me Mumma mus nyam [eat] / Me Puppa mus nyam / Me woman mus nyam / Me pickney [child] mus nyam." The fact that he was allegedly squatting on government land was irrelevant to the issue in Short Shirt's mind. His personal, economic survival was at stake and all else faded into obscurity. His family "mus nyam" at all costs... personal survival of the individual and his family can be seen as the most important element in this calpyso. A Trinidadian calypsonian, Lord Chalk- dust, demonstrates this attitude towards survival even more clearly when he at- tempts to sum up the Trinidadian person- ality: "They never had a fete / In Trinidad 24/CAIBBEAN rTview yet / Without somebody ain't storm [sneaked in free] / Fellas print their own ticket, sell their exit, / Or scale the wall, that's the norm / And if you bring a juke- box inside your place / They will rig that in front your face / Day and night for free, you could hear Chalkie [Lord Chalkdust] / With only cardboard money-so you see / Grenadian orBarbadian-you can't stop a Trinidadian. "When a Trini [Trinidadian] want money or a drink of rum / He play he has tooth- ache, and he beg for some / To soak his teeth or sap his head / Or run to the ex- press and say he's out of bread / And when he reach town -oops -he forget his money / He'll pay a 10 cents bus fare to Tunapuna /And drop out quite atArima / Jailbirds want to play mas so before Car- nival pass /All of dem does appeal lAnd on the tax forms that they send / Have down all dey friend children / Less tax to pay in the deal /A Trini will drink 10 pints of juice, and a fly in one he'll produce / And say, I ain't paying you know why / For them juice Ibuy /All of them pack up with fly / You see-Antiguan or Martini- quan -you can't stop a Trinidadian / Eng- lishman or Australian-you can't stop a Trinidadian. "For instance take 'Sideways' [a local character] in Woodford Square / Catching power [spirit possession] and preaching scripture / He'll pass round his hat to all who stop / And in 3 minutes time he drunk in a rum-shop / A Trini will go to Hilton Hotel / With doctor's papers so they'll treat him swell /And he bawling- please post my cheque for me / This time he's a doctor of whappie [a card game]. "A thief will park his bike, next to one that he like / Leave his and yours he will take / And if you catch him he won't shake / The defence he'll make, is good Lord it was a mistake / Two fellas will buy one bicycle license, and hear the smart- ness that will happen / You keep the re- ceipt-I keep the license / No police can't do we nutten / Grenadian or Jamaican- you can't stop a Trinidadian." Chalkdust is chauvinistic and claims the Anansi personality in this particular calypso as a peculiarly Trinidadian one. But the pop- ularity of Anansi stories in all the islands and the fact that this theme recurs not only in Trinidadian calypsos, but also in those of other islands, tells us that it is common in the English-speaking Caribbean; and if Frantz Fanon is to be believed, in the French-speaking Caribbean as well. Limits to Cunning The Antiguan Anansi is unremitting in his attempts to fool people, and it is a rare occa- sion indeed that sees him at a loss in any situation. He fools people however, not be- cause he enjoys it, but because he sees it as his only means of survival in a world where all the cards are stacked against the indi- vidual. He is bent on an individual quest for survival. Hence, he pretends to be lazy un- less he can see that his labor will bring forth an enormous reward. He will feed his family only after he has had his "bellyful," as we witness in "Anansi and the Magic Calabash" retold below [a calabash is a bowl made from a large bowl-shaped tree pod]. Notice, however, that he is punished for being extra- ordinarily greedy: "One day Anansi was walking in the 'bush' when he saw a cal- abash lying on the ground. He picked it up and admired it. The calabash sud- denly spoke to Anansi saying, 'I am a magic calabash and I can make you any food you want.' Anansi nearly dropped the calabash in fright, for whoever heard of a calabash that could speak? He spoke to the calabash, saying 'Was that you who just spoke?' Yes,' said the calabash; 'What can you make?' asked Anansi. The cal- abash told him that it could make any- thing under the sun, so long as Anansi sang it a special song. Anansi then asked it to make him some fungi and saltfish after he had sung the special song. "Lo and behold, the calabash filled up with the fungi and saltfish, and even added some choba to go with it. Anansi was pleased as punch and filled his belly with the food. Then he washed the cal- abash and went home. When he got home, he put the calabash in his bedroom under his bed and told his wife and chil- dren not to go under the bed or he would beat them. The next day, Anansi went out all day and when he came home, he went into the bedroom, locked the door and sang the special song to the calabash. The calabash immediately filled up with fungi, saltfish, choba and this time, it added a few okras to go with the meal. Anansi, greedy as he was, ate it all up and offered none to his family, who, mean- time, were out in the other room eating their simple meal and wondering what was going on behind the closed door Then Anansi cleaned the calabash and put it back under the bed. "Anansi's wife had heard the song quite clearly, and when Anansi left the next day, she went into the room, determined to find out what was under the bed. She CAIBBEAN rEvIew/25 Forthcoming March 12-14, 1984. Research Con- ference on the Jewish Experi- ence In Latin America. Albuquer- que, University of New Mexico. Contact: Latin American Institute, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM 87131; (505) 277-2961. March 21-24, 1984. Southwestern Historical Association and Southwestern Social Science Convention. Fort Worth, Texas. Theme: "The Americas in 1984." Contact: G.M. Yeager, Department of History, Tulane University, New Orleans, LA 70118. March 22-24, 1984. Seventeenth Annual Meeting of the South- west Council of Latin American Studies (SCOLAS). Edinburg, Texas, Pan American University. Contact: William J. Fleming, 1984 SCOLAS Program Chair, Depart- ment of History, Pan American Uni- versity, Edinburg, TX 78539. March 29-30, 1984. Center for Mi- gration Studies 7th Annual Con- ference. Washington, D.C., Wash- ington Hilton. Theme: "In Defense of Ihe Alien." Contact: Lydio F. Tomasi, Executive Director, Center for Mi- gration Studies, 209 Flagg Place, Staten Island, N.Y. 10304; (212) 351-8800. April 12-14,1984. Annual Meeting of South Eastern Council of Latin American Studies (SECOLAS). Auburn, Alabama. Theme: "The Many Cultures of Latin America." Contact: Professor Cooney, History Department, University of Louis- ville, Louisville, KY 40292; (502) 588-6817. April 25-28, 1984. Annual Border- land Scholars Association Meet- ing. San Diego, California, Conven- tion Center and Holiday Inn- Embarcadero. Contact: Oscar J. Martinez, Inter-American & Border Studies, University of Texas at El Paso, El Paso, TX 79968; (915) 747-5196/5157. April 27-28, 1984. II International Symposium on Latin American Indian Literatures. Washington, D.C., George Washington Univer- sity. Contact: Dr. Mary H. Preuss, President, LAILA/ALILA, Geneva College, Beaver Falls, PA 15010; (412) 486-5100, ext. 244. picked up the calabash from under the bed and figured that if she sang the song she had heard she would soon know what had taken place in the room. She sang the song and to her shock and sur- prise the calabash filled up with food!She and the children ate their belly full, washed the calabash and put it back un- der the bed. "Anansi came home, went as usual to the calabash and sang the song, asking the calabash for his meal for the day; but nothing happened. He sang the song again, this time louder than before; but nothing happened. Finally, he asked the calabash, 'What happen today, why you nar mek no food?' The calabash told him that he had already prepared the meal for the day, and couldn't make any more. Anansi got angry and smashed the cal- abash to bits. "The next day, he wentout as usualand while walking through the bush he saw a whip. He took up the whip and was ad- miring it when the whip said, 'I am a magic whip and I can perform for you'; without delay, Anansi said 'perform for me then, whipf The whip slipped out of his hands and began to beat poorAnansi. It followed him all the way home beating him without mercy, for the whip could only perform in the custom it was used to. It beat Anansi until he said he was sorry for not sharing the food from the calabash with his wife and children. From that day, Anansi learned that he couldn't leave his family without food while he filled his own belly." It is significant too that Anansi consistently tries to get the reward without the work. He defies the Puritan work ethic under which Caribbean colonial society developed. Anansi is a strong and good workman, but will not engage in work as an everyday routine. He will only work on occasion for an employer of his choice. Work is not an ac- cepted fact of life. In like manner, we have already heard from Chalkdust in his calypso entitled "You can't stop a Trinidadian," of the machinations of the "smart-man" in his at- tempt to come by easy pickings. While the folklore condones the "smart-man" charac- ter, it goes to great pains to condemn one who allows avarice and greed to blind judg- ment. In other words, one may trick the prevailing forces and even one's neighbor out of goods, but one may not overdo and let avarice take over. It is in such cases that we see Anansi falling on bad times. The calabash story demonstrates this point, and there is also the story of Anansi and Candle- fly, which shows Anansi craving so much that he loses all in the end. Here is an abbre- viated version. "One day Anansi went to Candlefly's house for some fire. Candlefly gave the fire to Anansi and also gave him a few eggs. The next day Anansi went back to Can- dlefly for fire again, hoping to be offered more eggs. Candlefly gave him some eggs as well as the fire. When Anansi reached halfway home he put out the fire and turned back, telling Candlefly that the fire went out. Candlefly gave him some more fire but no eggs. Anansi waited and waited to see if he could 'scrounge' more eggs from Candlefly, but Candlefly said to himself 'What mek him so greedy?' and ignored Anansi. Anansi finally had to ask Candlefly, outright, if he could give him some more eggs. Candlefly told him he didn't have any more, but he would show him where they could find any amount of eggs they wanted, if he came back after dark. Anansi did so, and he and Candlefly set out to find the eggs. "When they came to the place with the eggs, Anansi was so greedy that every time Candlefly tried to pick up an egg, he would grab it, so that in the end, his bag was full up and Candlefly didn't have any eggs at all. Candlefly was really vex and leave Anansi, taking all the light with him. Anansi was now left in the dark and had no idea where he was, because it was Candlefly who had guided him there and it was Candlefly who had the light. "He decided to try his luck in the dark, to find his way home. He came to a house and called out for help, saying that he had eggs to share with whoever helped him out of the darkness. To his surprise, it was the house of Tiger, his biggest enemy. He had problems. He could either try to run, or give Tiger his eggs, because he didn't dare take back his offer for fear of Tiger's strength. Well, everybody knows that Anansi, the spider couldn't begin to run even as fast as Tiger can walk, so there was really nothing for Anansi to do, but give Tiger the eggs and save his skin. So Tiger ate the whole bag of eggs and Anan- si got none. "Every day after that Anansi went to look for Candlefly in the hope that Candlefly would take him to the place with the eggs again, but Candlefly would not even come out to see him. He stayed inside his house and send to tell Anansi that he was sleeping." There are Antiguan sayings which also denounce such avarice. For example, "want all, get none"; "all crave, all lost"; "take you time, walk fast"; "hurry man nyam half-raw fungie"; "hungry dog nyam half-raw corn"; "no hang you cattacoo [basket] where you carn [can't] reach um." And in the folk song "Sammy Plant Piece a Corn Dung a Gully": "Twas not grief dat did kill poor Sammy / But a greedy, Sammy greedy / Mek him dead-o, AhaF Sometimes the storyteller not only tells it as he sees it, but he is the character in the tale. The storyteller adds from his own life experiences to these stories. Thus we see a calypsonian mirrored in a calypso by an- other calypsonian, depicted very much as an "Anansi." Lord Short Shirt stands ac- 26/CAiBBEAN rIvieW caused by Franco of playing what can only be considered an Anansi trick on him. After performing in a show for which Short Shirt was the organizer, Franco al- leges that Short Shirt had many convenient excuses for not paying him for his perform- ance. He chides him in a calypso entitled, "Want all, Get None": "All a me frens does tell me 'beware of Shorty [Short Shirt]' / He kin a badminded /He ain care bout anybody / Ah didn pay dem mind / Ah didn hear what dey say / Till de fellah rip me in the U.S.A. [ripped me off]. "We did two shows / Thousands were there to see /An when ah finish sing my friends / No money for me. "Pay me me money, Short Shirt /Ah ain making fun / Ah know you love you vio- lence /Ah don wan to use me gun / You talk bout love and help black brothers /As far as ah can see / You ain notten but a damn exploiter. "Come man, Shorty / Pay me me money / You no good son of a gun / Want all-ah go get none. "You is the one treating others like dirt / Shorty you love more money / Than Satan like sin / Poor someone like me - you still exploiting /All ah we endeavour- ing / But only you achieving / You damn hypocrite / Practice wha you preaching. "You say starvation cripplin' this coun- try /But how many starvin' /Because of you Shorty? / Only you an you family entitle to nyam / But others can starve / You don give a damn / Shorty me con- vince / You ain got no conscience. "Pay me money / or else is vengeance." It is demonstrated over and over in the calpyso and in Anansi stories that amoral- ism is not permissable in Caribbean society. One may live by one's wits, but one may not "kill" one's neighbor's to stay alive. ["Kill" is used here in the Antiguan dialect sense, meaning extreme exploitation. You "kill" someone if you steal all of their belongings, food, husband, wife, etc.] This unwritten code is witnessed in the following Anansi story: "One day Anansi fell on a plan to get some food. He planted a ground [vegetable plot] on the rocky land near to his house and all the animals passed by and laughed and made derisive remarks, saying that they had never seen anyone, besides Anansi, plant a ground on such rocky land. Well Anansi pretended that this really angered him and he made a promise to the Lord that 'Who don' mind they own business would drop dead.' The Lord agreed. "As the day wore on, several animals passed by and made comments on Anan- si's ground on the rock. They all dropped dead and Anansi cooked them and eat them. Guinea Bird decided that Anansi had gone too far this time and hit on a plan to catch him out He bought a new saddle and a horse, mounted the horse and rode by Anansi's ground singing, All dem boys who a go a barbershop part dem hair like me.' "Now everybody knows that Guinea Bird only has a little tuft of hair on the top of his head; and since Anansi know this too, he listened to Guinea Bird in wonder. And Guinea Bird kept riding back and forth, past Anansi singing the same re- frain. Finally, Anansi couldn't take it any longer and he said, 'Lord, forgive me, is I mek de law, but what Guinea Bird have on his head to part?' And promptly dropped dead!" This story demonstrates Antiguans' feeling that there is a limit to which one may exploit one's neighbors to survive and when that limit is reached, the entire community will react against you. So it was that Anansi received punishment for having "eaten" his neighbors through trick- ery. Anansi's "death" was his punishment. Conflicting Ideologies We would posit then, that it is not, as Walter Jekyll suggests, that there is no moral code in the Anansi stories (Jamaican Song and Story, 1966); there is a moral code, but it is not the same moral code as that put forward by ideology. Antiguans are forced to operate under a double standard. On the one hand, they have accepted the ideology of the con- trolling powers; and on the other hand, they have responded to that domination by de- veloping their own value system as evi- denced in much of the folklore and in the calypso. The dominant value system sug- gests that one should abide by the tenets of Christianity: do good to those that hurt you; work hard and you will find your reward in heaven, if not on earth; always be honest, virtuous and kind; and all of the other puritanical, Christian virtues which the Anti- guan had instilled in him through the so- cializing institutions of his society. The black folk culture, on the other hand, appears to recognize that the earthly reward is more meaningful than the heavenly one and the individual is advised to seek it through the use of any means available to him: hence, Anansi's use of his wits in the absence of brawn. The black folk culture also demon- strates that psychological survival can be secured by the rejection of the dominant ethos of the society in several areas. This last point is significant, for it is to the creators of the folk culture that we must turn if we wish to have a better picture of what binds the people together. Theodor Adorno has suggested that culture is "something distinct from the immediate struggle for in- dividual self-preservation" (Prisms, 1966). Thus, it is not through the use of their cul- ture that the mass of Antiguans hoped "to be." Rather, in their culture they demon- strate how they feel, what they think and what they have gone through. Culture also mirrors the mood of society, which perhaps Continued on page 49 Forthcoming April 27-29, 1984. VIII Simposlo So- bre Dialectologia del Caribe His- panico. Boca Raton, Florida Atlan- tic University. Contact: John Jensen, Department of Modern Languages, Florida International University, Miami, FL 33199; (305) 554-2851. May 29-31, 1984. Eighth Annual Conference of the Society for Caribbean Studies. Hoddeston, Hertfordshire, England, High Leigh Conference Centre. Contact: Don- ald Wood, School of African and Asian Studies, Arts Building C, Uni- versity of Sussex, Falmer, Brighton BN1 9QN, England. May 30-June 2, 1984. Ninth Annual Meeting of the Caribbean Stud- ies Association. St. Kitts, The Royal St. Kitts Hotel. Theme: "Strat- egies for Progress in the Post-Inde- pendence Caribbean." Contact: Frank L. Mills, Program Chair CSA84, Social Sciences Division, College of the Virgin Islands, St. Thomas, U.S.V.I. 00802. May 31-June 1, 1984. Conference on Technology Transfer in the Mod- ern World. Atlanta, Georgia. Theme: Issues and dimensions of international technology transfer. Contact: John R. Mclntyre, School of Social Sciences, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA 30332; (404) 894-3195. July 30-August 19, 1984. Interna- tional Musical Workshop. Basse- Terre, Guadeloupe. Theme: Crea- tion of a hymn for peace. Contact. Franpoise Lancreot, Artistic Man- ager, Comite de Jumelage de la Ville de Basse-Terre, 2, Allee du Mont- Carmel, 97100 Basse-Terre, Guadeloupe: (596) 81-18-91. September 27-29, 1984. RMCLAS 1984 Fall Meeting. Seeley Lake, Montana, Double Arrow Ranch. Contact: Prof. Stanley Rose, De- partment of Foreign Languages, University of Montana, Missoula, MT 59812. June, 1985. 45th Congreso Interna- cional de Americanistas. Bogota. Colombia. Theme: "Man in the Americas." Contact: Nohra Rey de Marulanda, Comite Ejecutivo, 45' Congress Internacional de Ameri- canistas, Rectoria, Universidad de los Andes, Apartado Abreo No. 4976, Bogota, Colombia. CA,?BBEAN FeVIWe/27 All 3- 28/ CAJ?BBEAN rMPIEvW ,f /A_-", 7 - 4-/ ,~J ,, j, I .. .. ,! .,...... .- . 28/ __.BEA -- F> .. .,V --- "-. -W: Thoughts on Caribbean Society An Anthropological Critique Reviewed by Sidney W. Mintz Main Currents in Caribbean Thought: The Historical Evolution of Caribbean Society in Its Ideological Aspects, 1492-1900, Gordon K. Lewis. 375 pp. Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore and London, 1983. $25. By what may look to the outsider like an act of will, Professor Gordon Lewis has so firmly identified himself with the Caribbean region that many of his read- ers think he is West Indian. In fact, his ex- traordinary acuity as an observer of things Caribbean seems to come precisely from his being a "foreigner," and not a "native." His view has consistently been pan-Carib- bean, and rare indeed is the Caribbean na- tive who can rise more than briefly above a rooted identity in, and with, some particular insular society. In this interesting new book, Lewis gives us his perspective on the entire region rather than on one of its component so- cieties, and telegraphs his bias by subtitling the book "The historical evolution of Carib- bean society in its ideological aspects." Nota bene: "society"-not "societies." Here is the special thrust of the work, its strength and, as I shall try to demonstrate, also its weakness. The rest of the title is just as important. By "main currents in Caribbean thought," Lewis means what Caribbean thinkers gave to others as their perceptions of themselves and their societies, and also of the wider world of which the Caribbean has, since 1492, been a part. It is, then, intended as a book of ideas about ideas; but Lewis recog- nizes that what Caribbean people thought was always a coefficient of what they were: what they experienced, with what they were endowed, of what they were deprived. And Sidney W Mintz is professor of anthropology at The Johns Hopkins University. Among his works are Cahamelar: The Subculture of a Rural Sugar Plantation Proletariat; Worker in the Cane: A Puerto Rican Life History; Carib- bean Transformations, Slavery, Colonialism, and Racism; and Working Papers in Haitian Society and Culture. of course he understands that since ideas rise from, express, transmute-and often, even contradict or escape from-the mate- rial world, the nature of that world must figure in their story. The book is divided into six chapters, arranged in chronological order. The first chapter, "The sociohistorical setting," con- tains but 28 pages; the concluding chapter, a mere eight and one-half. The bulk of the book thus falls within four chapters which deal, successively, with the beginnings of Caribbean thought, the proslavery and anti- slavery ideology in the eighteenth and nine- teenth centuries, and the growth of nationalist ideology through 1900. This is not that common case where the roll turns out to be better than the hamburger; in- deed, the hamburger here is awfully good, even if one skips the roll. Only someone steeped for decades in the literature of the Caribbean-literature in its widest sense-could have provided this re- markable demonstration of breadth and depth of knowledge. One can hardly find a page that does not explain a source, de- scribe the thoughts of some Caribbean thinker, or meld person and idea together in a useful insight. It is also a book that at- tempts to synthesize substantial quantities of information on various subjects: slave resistance and accommodation, Caribbean religions, island economic life, and much else. By no means an easy book to read- Lewis has never patronized his readers by simplifying his ideas-and a challenge even for the knowledgeable reader, this in- troduction to Antillean thinkers is the au- thor's capital attempt to explain what has been for him a nearly lifelong interest. But there is a problem, more conceptual than factual. It seems to arise from two dif- ferent but related considerations. In the first place, Lewis believes there is a single Carib- bean culture (the obverse of his "Caribbean society"), rather than Caribbean cultures; and he is wrong. In the second place, Lewis's conception of culture-what culture is-is flawed. His view is certainly well intended and an improvement over some of his earlier thinking on the subject (for in- stance, in his Puerto Rico, published twenty years ago). But he seems now to have decided that there are two cultures, an elite version which is somehow not very rel- evant, and another, anthropological version, which is: "The history, then, of Caribbean culture in its anthropological sense (and on which, in the nature of things, much of its literary culture is based) is the history of forms created by the masses: in religion, music, dance, language, folklore, and entertainment." But, even if anthropologists do talk about "a culture" as being the distinctive way of life of a group, it is not some palpable, imper- meable object, neither diffusing outward nor unable to change in response to exter- nal forces. If one chooses to use the word as a synonym for object, (literary object, object of the masses, elite object-thing, in short), then we can redefine it any way and as often as we wish; but it will still have little to do with what most anthropologists mean by culture-masses or no masses. It was once important for anthropology to establish the universal human capacity to think sym- bolically, to invest the material world with meaning, thereupon to deal with a reality thus created on its own terms, by all hu- mans and by any humans. This was essen- tial if social science were ever to surmount the belief, once very common and certainly still with us, that some folks (particularly, rich white folks) had culture, and other folks didn't. It later became important to show that the nature of culture was complicated, among other things, by differences in status and, in large complex societies, by dif- ferences in class. To some extent, at least, it was possible to argue that different classes within the same society had different sets of conventional meanings-that the abstrac- tion called class and the abstraction called culture were linked, though by no means the same. This is one reason why the idea of a national culture came to be reexamined in recent years, and the whole question of so- ciety versus culture reopened (not that any consensus has emerged). One cannot expect Lewis to deal with these issues. But because he has not, yet insists on using his own version of the social scientists' concepts, a lot of what he writes remains unconvincing, or at least notice- ably incomplete. At times it leads him from CAI?BBcAN rPEVlW/29 the analysis of particular phenomena into a kind of incantation of unity which, though eloquent, remains ultimately unpersuasive. Space allows for only one example. In discussing similarities between the Mediter- ranean and Caribbean regions (a compari- son which seems to underlie his treatment of Caribbean culture as one), Lewis argues that both regions saw a deep gulf between the belief systems of the rulers and the peo- ple. "Christianity itself," he writes, "owed its structures of dogma and myth in large part to older cult-religions, like the Mithra cult, of the pre-Christian period. In similar fashion, the real religions of the Caribbean poor have been syncretic belief-systems combining the imported Christian ideas with earlier ideas, mainly African-Shango, the secret Negro cults of the Americas, not to mention Afro-Trinidadian Shango-obeah complex, Bamboo-tamboo, and Camboulay, the Afro-Jamaican Rastafarian and Poco- mania following, Haitian vodun and its tre- mendous apocalyptic Afro-Haitian vision, Puerto Rican spiritualism, Cuban santeria with its esoteric amalgam of Yoruba gods and Catholic saints. To speak at any length with a Rastafarian bearded cultist, with his vision of Jamaica as an oppressive Egyp- tian bondage, is to return to the world of the unknown author-mystic of the Book of Rev- elation, with its fierce denunciation of the hated Roman Empire. The sole qualifica- tion that has to be added to that analogy, of course, relates to the fact that, in the Carib- bean, the wealthy and the powerful were also at the same time white and European, given the almost exact correlation that has existed in the society between class and race." While this way of melting down the par- ticularities of Caribbean societies and cul- tures seems momentarily to effect an easy synthesis, it does not really help the reader understand the Caribbean region, except as one in which a small number of people of one physical type cruelly pushed around a large number of people of another. Syn- cresis in religion may be a precipitate of the social interaction between rulers and ruled, particularly if their origins are different. But to reduce Shango, vodun, santeria and all the rest to a single category (religions of the masses, in contrast to religions of the rulers?), in order to make a general point, is to renounce the marvelous complexity of the Caribbean past and present, rather than to reveal it. Such simplification suspends insight in order to achieve an ultimately su- perficial generalization. Lewis, being a su- perb political scientist, would never do this in his political analysis; but he is easily led into doing it in his analyses of religion, and much else. The very same lumping-to- gether to make a similar point resurfaces later, but is no more convincing. In this sec- ond instance, it is little more than a jump- ing-off place for a lengthy discussion of "the ideology of slave religion." It is for the sake of creating some monolithic, homoge- neous picture of the region that these "re- ductions" of material are undertaken; and this reviewer, at least, found them flimsy. Not only is there no single Caribbean cul- ture, it is hard to see how one can speak of a single Caribbean society. The term "soci- ety" is used in many different ways, of course, as is the term "culture." But it is, at least in general sociological usage, iso- morphic with political structures. One can imagine different cultures within one soci- ety; it is harder to see what would be meant by a single society which included both Haiti and Cuba, for instance, whether in the past or in the present. These problems with terminology are not, in fact, mere semantic quibbles; for it is by such overflexible usages that Lewis can seem to synthesize what are sometimes irreconcilable opposites. These criticisms, once made, should not cloud the reality of Lewis's accomplish- ment. He shows how European ideas about the human species, the nature of equality and inequality, the relations between so- cieties (including colonies and metropo- lises) and among human beings, were transmuted in the Caribbean context, by the Europeans themselves and by the indige- nization processes which created Caribbean peoples and Caribbean thinkers. By fram- ing the evolution of Caribbean thought within the proslavery and antislavery move- ments, the author bounds his arguments fairly; for within these bodies of thought can be found nearly everything that was written which is worthy of note in a book like this one. There are arguable passages and posi- tions, to be sure; but the line of argument is elegant. No serious student of the Caribbean can afford not to read this book. From the reflec- tions of Fray Ram6n Pane and Fray Bar- tolome de las Casas to the visions of Antenor Firmin and Hannibal Price, Lewis leads us through four centuries of Carib- bean thought with erudition and deftness. Gordon Lewis deserves, as always, our thanks; his editor, Richard Price, and the Johns Hopkins University Press, our con- gratulations. D Who speaks for the Caribbean? Caribbean Review does! Please send a subscnption for the period indicated. Mail to: Caribbean Review Florida International University Miami, Florida 33199 Name Address City Country Zip Fi My check for s_ is enclosed. Please charge to my MasterCard I Visa 0 Account No Expiration Date Signature 1 Year 2 Years 3 Years For subscribers in the U.S., PR., & U S.V.I. ID 512.00 D 520.00 0 $25.00 For subscribers in the Caribbean, LA., & Canada C 5 18.00 0 $32.00 0 543.00 For subscribers in other destinations D $24.00 0 544.00 0 $61.00 Subscriptions to the Caribbean, Latin America, Canada, and other foreign destinations will automatically be shipped by AO-Air Mail. 30/CAI?BBEAN FCVIEW The Dual Colonization of an Island A Political and Cultural History of Puerto Rico Reviewed by Olga Jim6nez de Wagenheim Puerto Rico: A Political and Cultural History, Arturo Morales Carri6n, with Maria Teresa Babin, Aida Caro Costas, Luis Gonzalez Vales and Arturo Santana. 384 pp. W.W Norton & Company, Inc., New York, 1983. $19.50. his recent work by the distinguished historian Arturo Morales Carri6n, with the collaboration of four well- known Puerto Rican scholars, is a welcome addition to Puerto Rican historiography. Al- though there are hundreds of English-lan- guage studies about Puerto Rico, there is no comprehensive study of the island's histor- ical development as good as this one. Using extensive primary sources, the au- thors set out to create an integrated history of the island, covering the Spanish and American colonizations in similar fashion. The book contains new information and serious analysis of the island's relationship with the United States during the twentieth century. It provides a selective list of read- ings on topics seldom studied and a the- oretical framework with which to view the cultural and political development of the colonial society under Spanish and Ameri- can rule. The Spanish Colony The first part, entitled "The Emergence of a People," reflects an enormous amount of research. Aida Caro focuses on the con- quest, colonization, and the settling of Spanish institutions on the island during the first two centuries of Spanish rule. She emphasizes the strategic role Puerto Rico played as a defensive outpost of the Spanish empire in the 16th century. Arturo Santana and Luis Gonzalez Vales study the fate of Puerto Rico from the 1760s to 1815. While Santana focuses on changes in the Spanish administration resulting from the many ex- ternal pressures on the Crown during this period, Gonzalez stresses the changes that took place in Puerto Rico. Santana dis- Olga Jimenez de Wagenheim teaches history at Rutgers University, Newark, New Jersey. She is the author of works on El Grito de Lares. Labor leader Santiago Iglesias Pantin. cusses how the revolutionary trend in the Caribbean, the Enlightenment and the growing interest in Puerto Rico by other European powers, led to changes of policy that had a great impact on Puerto Rico. How this impact was translated into specific pro- grams is the essence of the essay by Gonzalez. Two other essays by Gonzalez deal with the reforms granted by the liberal govern- ment of Spain in the first two decades of the nineteenth century and with the political development of the society during the last half of that century. The first uses extensive documentation from an earlier study of Ale- jandro Ramirez and provides a good analy- sis of the colonial economy and society, which is missing from the second essay. The treatment of the period from 1866 to 1897 is sketchy and offers nothing we do not already know. Its value, however, is that it presents the major political trends in a co- herent narrative. Taken as a whole, "The Emergence of a People" is an important section, providing the background against which the second colonization of the island need be analyzed. It demonstrates that by the time the United States occupied the island, there was a peo- ple with a distinct culturally and politically developed personality, who could not be easily absorbed by the new colonizers. This section also establishes a number of historical parallels which are later used in the analysis of the American colonization. For example, as a Spanish colony, Puerto Rico was important first for its strategic position as a military outpost protecting other Spanish colonies in the New World. For the United States of 1898, Puerto Rico represented a potential naval base from which to patrol the Caribbean. Under the Spanish government, Puerto Rico's political elite became divided over the national ques- tion. Three factions-known as incondi- cionales, or assimilationists, autono- mistas, or advocates of self-rule, and separatists, or proponents of indepen- dence-emerged in the nineteenth century. A similar division took place after the US occupation, as the new assimilationists rallied around the ideal of statehood for Puerto Rico, the autonomists called for self- government within the United States' fold, and the independentistas and so- cialistas argued in favor of complete separation. Struggle for Identity The middle section, "The Struggle for Iden- tity," focuses on the 20th century. This sec- tion, written exclusively by Morales Carri6n, offers an important discussion of the Ameri- can colonization of Puerto Rico. Although the emphasis is on political and cultural development, the study includes much in- formation on the evolution of the economy. Organized chronologically, it covers the pe- riod from the occupation of the island in 1898 to the end of the Popular Democratic Party's hegemony in 1969, ending with a short essay on the present crisis. The inter- vening essays deal with the framing of the policy of colonial tutelage, the reactions of the Puerto Rican people, the modification of the colonial policy, the economic crisis and political chaos of the 1930s, the forging of consensus, and the achievements and un- finished plans of the Muhoz government. The study revolves around two major cAIBBEAN KeVIEW/31 themes: the complex relationship between Puerto Rico and the United States (es- pecially as it has influenced the develop- ment of the society) and the persistent evolution of the Puerto Rican personality- despite the pressures for cultural absorp- tion. In his interpretation of the American colonization of Puerto Rico, Morales Carri6n presents the Puerto Rican people as active, creative participants rather than as victims of a colonial system. Thus, he recognizes the importance of the many Puerto Rican leaders who struggled against the policy of colonial tutelage. Yet at no time does he deny the role played by equally important American personalities who favored a liber- alization of the policy. Morales acknowl- edges the events which pushed the US towards a change in its colonial policy: two world wars, the creation of the United Na- tions, and the emergence of the Third World bloc. Morales Carri6n's study is valuable not only for its information but also for its rec- ognition of many often-forgotten Puerto Rican figures. Furthermore, it provides a Penetre en____ Centroamerica con Semanario editado por el peri6dico La Nacion, de Costa Rica La Naci6n Internacional ofrece a usted informaci6n indispensable para su actividad professional y em- presarial. Reportajes, entrevistas, anAlisis y comen- tarios elaborados por periodistas profesionales, conocedores y estudiosos de la realidad hist6rica del istmo, le permitiran seguir paso a paso la evolu- ci6n de una region en crisis. La Nacion SUSCRIBASE Internacionall Apartado 10138 San Jose, Costa Rica Nombre (Favor usar letra de molde) Direcci6n Suscribo por l 2ahos$110 l un ahos $60 E 6 meses $30 O Adjunto cheque E Letra 0 Money Order Autorizo cargarlo a mi tarjeta de credit El Visa 0 Master Card El American Express Tarjeta No. Vence Firma theoretical framework which takes as a given the existence of apatria-pueblo, or a full-grown people who have worked hard to maintain their sense of self despite the enor- mous pressures imposed by the American colonization. In Morales' last essay he ventures into the present crisis which he sees as undermin- ing the work of previous administrations. He proposes that the United States and Puerto Rico work together to review once again their common ties. He realizes, as do most Puerto Ricans, that the present rela- tionship is not acceptable. Yet there is no apparent consensus. A sector of Puerto Rican society has been led to believe that the island can become a US state without having to relinquish its language, values and way of life. Until the United States de- fines the terms under which it is willing to grant statehood to Puerto Rico, the people will continue to be divided and unable to reach a new consensus. Morales ends with a warning: Puerto Ricans may learn English and be influenced by many US ways, but Puerto Rico will always be a "different pa- tria-pueblo, with its own language, its ethos, its sense of identity." The final part, "A Special Voice: The Cul- tural Expression," by Maria Teresa Babin, consists of one chapter, tacked onto the end of the book. Although it contains much that has appeared in other books by the author, the present version takes into account the growing cultural expression of the Puerto Rican community in the United States, an aspect of Puerto Rican culture ignored by many scholars. The essay is devoted to the study of the island's cultural manifestations as they are represented in folk traditions, art and litera- ture. It presents the trends that have influ- enced the society from the Taino Indian days to the present. The essay is more de- scriptive than analytical, listing figures who have contributed to the various arts without explaining the historical conditions that shaped the individual, the genre or the art movement. Culture, in this essay, tends to be viewed as a phenomenon separate from the social and economic forces operating at a given time. This volume is not without flaws. How- ever, a review of nearly five hundred years of Puerto Rican history-with its Spanish and American colonizations-divided popula- tion, and unsolved political status-pres- ents major problems to anyone attempting a comprehensive study such as this. Some periods of the island's history have yet to be researched; others have been studied from the colonizer's point of view. Against these odds, this book was conceived. It has suc- ceeded in presenting a coherent argument and a balanced account of emotionally-rid- den events, which would have been dis- torted by less sophisticated scholars. EO 32/CAI?BBEAN rEVIEW * 60 courses on Latin America and the Caribbean each academic year; language training in Spanish, Portuguese and Haitian Creole. * 47 faculty specialists in the humanities, social sciences, natural sciences and professional schools. * Certificate in Latin American and Caribbean Studies. * Master's degree programs in international studies, economics and international business. * Founding member, with Department of Economics, of IESCARIBE (Institute of Economic and Social Research of the Caribbean Basin). * Translation and Interpretation Program. * Summer study in Latin America. * Lectures by distinguished visiting scholars; film series and other extracurricular activities. * Latin American and Caribbean Students' Association. * One of the 12 National Resource Centers of Latin American Studies supported by the US Department of Education. * Annual workshops for public school teachers and journalists. * Monthly discussion groups with members of business, banking and legal communities. * Conferences on immigration and refugee policy, business risk in Latin America, Caribbean Basin economic conditions, and Caribbean dialectology. Library collection rich in area-related materials, particularly for the Caribbean. Latin American and Caribbean Reading Room housing special collections, bibliographic and reference materials, newspapers, government documents, and publications of international organizations such as the OAS, CELADE, ECLA, CARIFTA and IDB. Multidisciplinary research emphasizing the Caribbean Basin; ongoing faculty projects on Haitian and Cuban migration, Cuban oral history, Honduras, US foreign policy in the Caribbean, urban environment and health, patterns of social and occupational stratification in Argentina and Costa Rica, the Amazon. For further information contact: Latin American and Caribbean Center Florida International University Tamiami Trail Miami, Florida 33199 Latin American and Caribbean Studies Faculty Irma Alonso, Economics; Carlos Alvarez, Education; Ewart Archer, International Relations; Gabriel Aurioles, Technology; Ken I. Boodhoo, International Relations; Manuel Carvajal, Economics; Forrest Colburn, Political Science; Roberto Cruz, Economics; Grenville Draper, Physical Sciences; Nancy Erwin, International Relations; Luis Escovar, Psychology; Robert Farrell, Education; Gordon Finley, Psychology; Charles Frankenhoff, Health Services; Fernando Gonzalez-Reigosa, Psychology; Lowell Gudmundson, History; John Jensen, Modern Languages; David Jeuda, Modern Languages; Farrokh Jhabvala, International Relations; Antonio Jorge, Economics; Charles Lacombe, (Adjunct) Anthropology; David Lee, Biology; William Leffland, International Affairs Center; Barry B. Levine, Sociology; Jan Luytjes, International Business; Anthony P Maingot, Sociology; Luis Martinez- P6rez, Education; James A. Mau, Sociology; Florentin Maurrasse, Physical Sciences; Ram6n Mendoza, Modern Languages; Raul Moncarz, Economics; Olga Nazario, (Adjunct) International Relations; Marta Ortiz, Marketing; Leonardo Rodrfguez, International Business; Mark B. Rosenberg, Political Science; Reinaldo Sanchez, Modern Languages; Luis P., Salas, Criminal Justice; Jorge Salazar, Economics; Philip Shepherd, International Business; Alex Stepick, Anthropology; George Sutija, International Banking; Mark D. Szuchman, History; Anitra Thorhaug, Biology; William T. Vickers, Anthropology; Jos6 T. Villate, Technology; Maida Watson Espener, Modern Languages; Mira Wilkins, Economics. CAT?BBEAN PFVIEW/33 Latin American and Caribbean Center Puerto Rican Counterpoint Fernando Pic6 and the Culture of Coffee Reviewed by Lowell Gudmundson Libertad y servidumbre en el Puerto Rico del siglo XIX (los jornaleros utuadefios en visperas del auge del cafe), Fernando Pic6. 191 pp. Ediciones El Huracan, Rio Piedras, 1979, revised second edition 1982. Amargo cafe (los pequehios y medianos caficultores de Utuado en la segunda mitad del siglo XIX) Fernando Pic6. 162 pp. Ediciones El Huracan, Rio Piedras, 1981. "Deshumanizaci6n del trabajo, cosificaci6n de la naturaleza: Los comienzos del cafe en el Utuado del siglo XIX," Fernando Pic6. Pp.187-206 in Inmigracion y classes sociales en el Puerto Rico del siglo XIX, Francisco A. Scarano, ed. Ediciones El Huracan, Rio Piedras, 1981. In his "Cuban Counterpoint," Fernando Ortiz contrasted the social and eco- nomic characteristics of sugar and to- bacco, the sweetener produced on large estates and the aromatic leaf by the small- holds. The consequences of this diver- gence form the bulk of Ortiz's still suggestive work. Within the burgeoning Puerto Rican social history, Fernando Pic6 occupies a similar position to Orti z. The un- stated Puerto Rican counterpoint is be- tween the sugar plantation system and coffee rather than tobacco. Pic6 reveals the consequences of this divergence among agrarian subsystems in Puerto Rico with the same eloquence brought to bear on the Cuban case a generation before by Ortiz. Trained in European medieval history, Pic6 has produced a masterful series of Lowell Gudmundson teaches history at Flor- ida International University. He is the author of Estratificaci6n socio-racial y econ6mica de Costa Rica: 1700-1850; Hacendados, pre- caristas y politicos, and "Costa Rica Before Coffee." studies of the history of common people, their life experiences, social relations and mentality& within the "coffee universe" of the interior municipalities. In his first work, on the jornaleros of Utuado, Pic6 force- fully attacks the widespread and folkloric image of a Puerto Rico inhabited by free- holding Jibaros throughout the back coun- try. He shows how large numbers of peripheral cultivators were progressively re- duced to proletarian status as both coffee and commercialization gained sway during the mid-19th century. His analysis is based on painstakingly re- constructed life histories of early settler families (labradores) in 18th-century Utuado, culled from parochial, census and testate records critically supplemented by labor registration files after 1849. Pic6 shows how a complex pre-coffee land ten- ure system of untitled squatters, tenants, and a few title-holding residents and out- side merchants, gave way to privatization and fully commercial tenancy. In the pro- cess, much of the earlier squatter and sharecropping tenant population was quickly reduced to proletarian status. De- scendants of landed village founders suf- fered a similar fate, and the remainder were forced from the top of the social pyramid by newly arriving peninsular and coastal mer- chant hacendados. As with other authors, in particular Laird W. Bergad, (Coffee and the Growth of Agrarian Capitalism in 19th-Century Puerto Rico, Princeton University Press, 1983), Pic6 emphasizes proletarianization and downward mobility nearly to the exclu- sion of other processes. Yet in looking at only one setting of recent settlement (nec- essarily ignoring migration from older set- tled coastal regions and/or to the more egalitarian and rapidly expanding coffee frontier), Pic6 may be correct in emphasiz- ing proletarianization. However, in tying his analysis of inheritance and downward mo- bility among Utuadeflos to the correlation with jornalero status after 1849, Pic6 faces a documentary dilemma. To the extent that records of inheritance included only those with significant real property to bequeath, only those post-1849 jomaleros descen- dant from formerly propertied labrador families could be traced through testate re- cords. Long-term jornalero or property- less families would escape such documen- tation. This documentary bias does nothing to reduce the validity of the cases studied by Pic6; it does, however, lead to a questioning of the argument for society-wide downward mobility of a predominantly labrador or smallholder society with coffee. Reacting, perhaps, to this incomplete picture of his first volume, Pic6 quickly fol- lowed with a study of the history of small and medium landholders within the coffee economy. Here he shows how tenaciously labrador families held on to their shrinking land base. This is so despite increasing in- debtedness and coercion by the Registro and libreta recruitment system. His thema- tic analysis is followed by four family recon- structions, in which the documentary virtuosity of the author is revealed. Throughout, the story remains one of downward mobility and eventual proletaria- nization for many. Nevertheless, the process was long and drawn out, with many surviv- ing the demise of the creole hacienda sys- tem in the early 20th century. Perhaps the most intriguing question left unanswered by Pic6 is the precise timing of full pro- letarianization and the political role of those caught up in this century-long process. A recent doctoral dissertation, by Juan Jose Baldrich ("Class and the State: The Origins of Populism in Puerto Rico, 1934-1952," Yale University, 1981), begins to shed some light on possible connections between these pressured smallholder remnants and the rise of Mufloz Marin's jibaro politics in the 1930s, a logical implication and wel- come extension of Pic6's second work. In his most recent work, Pic6 tantalizingly explores the changes in mentality and so- cial relations which coffee brought to rural dwellers. He argues for the "dehumaniza- tion" of labor, both salaried and familial, as its market value became more and more evident and demands put upon it became ever greater. This he sees not only in the in- creasing regimentation of rural pro- letarians' labor, but just as importantly in the growing demands placed upon young chil- 34/CAR?BBEAN REVIEW Drying coffee beans, San Sebastian, Puerto Rico, 1941. dren's labor in ancillary tasks and full-time adult employment. This overarching concept is particularly important because it suggests that the sep- aration of human effort from formerly direct production of basic necessities, and its re- duction to routinized commodity produc- tion, was an enveloping global process not limited to directly coercive social relations. This comes as an important advance upon, and antidote to, the abundant literature on Latin America which merely denounces the repressive aspects of 19th-century agrarian capitalism as if these alone were "aberrant" or repugnant features of an otherwise laudi- ble capitalist development model. Despite his general emphasis on the proletarianiza- tion of the jibaro, Pic6 shows how the transformations wrought by capitalist de- velopment went far deeper than the occa- sional initial regimentation of labor. The damage done to the human beings went far beyond the overt repression of labor or any simple "polarization" between rich and poor, landed and landless. Pic6 analyzes the "objectification" of the surrounding environment by rural dwellers caught up in the dance of the millions with coffee. From a pattern of nearly symbiotic swidden farming in the primeval forest, cof- fee farmers moved toward systematic de- forestation, row cultivation and fencing. The new conventions threatened the ecosystem and objectified the emergent privatization of land, labor and social relations characteris- tic of agrarian capitalism and the bourgeois order. Parallel to this destruction, and subse- quent reconstruction with coffee, land itself came to be conceived of differently. Whereas land had previously been vaguely measured, poorly exploited and sold for a pittance, its resources now would be re- served only to legal owners and would be- come the subject of intensely finite measurement. The very concept of dis- tance and the means of measurement themselves would undergo a revolutionary change, leaving behind such quaint colo- nial conceptualizations as that described by the late 18th-century observer, General O'Reilly, who lamented that land and dis- tance in the then colony could not be accu- rately expressed in leagues, since the locals did not "understand" such a measure. They had conceived of distance in terms of human gait, a reflection of the primary con- sideration of traveling time for mobile sub- sistence cultivators in a precapitalist sys- tem. By the late 19th century, Puerto Ricans not only knew how to measure leagues, they increasingly traversed them in their lifetimes as they continually advanced the privatized coffee frontier. If European and North American capitalist development wit- nessed the redefinition of "work time" and "free time" within industrial, regimented la- bor norms, then surely one major Latin American agrarian capitalist equivalent was this conceptual redefinition of land and dis- tance, and their measurement. The work of Fernando Pic6 establishes a basis for a multitude of comparative foci. It clearly provides the coffee "counterpoint" to sugar in Puerto Rico. Moreover, it builds ingeniously upon the conceptual basis of- fered by contemporary studies of European transition to capitalism by exploring such fundamental categories as privatization, mentality and environment, both physical and social, and by studying changing family formation patterns. Pic6 provides an in-depth portrait of a coffee economy char- acterized by both proletarianization/ regimentation and pervasive smallholding. Thus, he provides a unique case study of an experience which falls near the center of any continuum of Latin American coffee economies. If we are to fully elaborate a comparative, continental model of coffee culture in Latin America, Femando Pic6's studies will form a critical part of such a syn- thesis. O CAr?BBEAN P V1W/35 Colombia's Tobacco Road Feudalism Versus Capitalism in the Tobacco Fields Reviewed by Philip L. Shepherd Aparceros en Boyaca: Los condenados del tabaco, Maria Cristina Salazar. 157 pp. Ediciones Tercer Mundo, Bogota, 1982. How has Colombia's nationally- owned cigarette industry-virtually the only one left in Latin America- managed to hold out against the incursions of transnational cigarette firms (TNC's)? Salazar's excellent study of sharecrop- ping among Colombian tobacco farmers seems to suggest that one reason for its survival is the fact that Colombia's private, quasi-monopolistic cigarette firm, the Compahiia Colombiana de Tabacos, S.A. (COLTABACO), has been extraordinarily successful at exploiting domestic tobacco farmers. Thus, its low leaf prices have en- abled it to keep domestic black tobacco (tabaco negro) cigarettes cheap enough to do battle with the transnational firms' more expensive light tobacco (tabaco rubio) brands. Salazar's analysis of the "super-exploita- tion" of Colombian sharecroppers also pro- vides an explanation of why COLTABACO has acquired such an enduring vested inter- est in the "defense" of Colombia's tabaco negro production against the transna- tionals' attempts to convince consumers all over Latin America to smoke tabaco rubio cigarettes (once culturally indigenous only to the US and UK). Changes in tastes were frequently the beginning of the end for na- tionally-owned cigarette companies else- where in Latin America. Tobacco production in Colombia is di- vided into three readily identifiable sectors based on use, region, and type of tobacco: (a) a tabaco negro export area concen- trated on the coast in the departments of Bolivia, Magdalena and Sucre; (b) a tabaco negro area in Santander, Boyaca and Tolima which produces tobacco for domes- tic consumption; and (c) a relatively new Philip L. Shepherd is assistant professor in the Department of Marketing at Florida Interna- tional University. He has written extensively on the role of transnational corporations and the international cigarette industry. sector producing tabaco rubio for domes- tic cigarettes in Guajira, Cesar, Santander, Valle and Cauca. Salazar looked at only sec- tor (b), and but a very small portion of that, in three municipios in Boyaca, where the much larger Santander domestic tabaco negro producing area spills over. Share- cropping on extremely small "micro-mini- fundia" plots predominated in this San- tander-Boyaca area. Salazar asks: Why has sharecropping persisted among tobacco farmers in this region when elsewhere in Colombia it has disappeared, and it has also disappeared in this same region for other crops? Or, more generally, given the strong tendency for cap- italist modes of production in Colombian agriculture, how and why have precapitalist forms like aparceria survived, when they belong "more to the past than to the present?" Salazar did a fine job in the field, enabling her to understand (rather than simply re- port) the information she collected. For ex- ample, although the COLTABACO data she examined showed that there were sup- posedly more property owners than share- croppers planting tobacco for the company, this is, in fact, not the case. The company contract data usually refer to the landowner, not the actual producer. Salazar was able to go beyond the raw data, showing that sharecroppers really make up somewhere between 60-80 percent of the producers. Salazar finds that aparceria survives among tobacco producers mainly because it permits extraordinarily high rates of ex- ploitation of tobacco peasants. This exploi- tation is basically self-exploitation and exploitation of the campesino's family. The campesino family sharecropping tobacco works harder for less money than would a capitalist farmer using wage labor. Much of the labor of the campesino and his family is not paid for or included in any cost cal- culus, thus reducing, often drastically, the real rate of return to campesinos who sharecrop. Salazar also argues, somewhat less convincingly, that similar rates of self- exploitation characterize tobacco produc- tion by campesinos who own the land they till. Salazar has put her finger on a very im- portant topic which has only infrequently been recognized: the role of self-exploita- tion and family labor in capitalist and pre- capitalist forms of production. Small family enterprises virtually everywhere in the last 400 years have only survived, for the most part, because of their ability to self-exploit themselves and compete by reducing their real rate of return. As Salazar concludes: "The peasant integrates himself into the system self-exploiting himself and exploit- ing the labor of the members of his own family .. The only viable explanation for the survival of the peasant production units is located in their capacity to absorb a greater exploitation than that found with wage labor." Why does the aparcero continue to sharecrop and exploit himself and his fam- ily? The campesino and his family have few alternatives, though there has been con- siderable out-migration. Given the lack of land, alternative crops, credit, markets, etc., most aparceros simply do not have any choice but to continue. Lack of alternatives is reinforced by chronic indebtedness to landlords and COLTABACO. As Salazar points out, the socioeconomic and political power of COLTABACO is everywhere appar- ent in the Santander-Boyaca tobacco re- gion, giving the whole area the aspect of a company town. Salazar quotes several campesinos as saying that growing to- bacco for the company is a "vicio," addic- tively easy to start, practically impossible to quit. Paradoxically, there is also some eco- nomic security-albeit at almost unimag- inable levels of misery-associated with sharecropping tobacco. The campesino family lives off the tobacco loan money for seven months a year and the reliability of this income is highly valued by the peas- ants. Moreover the crop itself is readily transferable into cash in emergencies. Who Benefits? It is necessary to ask two closely interrelated questions. What causes exploitation-cap- italist or precapitalist modes of production? Who benefits from this system-financial- 36/CAIBBEAN -EVIEW industrial capital (COLTABACO) or (pre- capitalist) landlords? Salazar seems to have been very am- bivalent about both of these issues. On the one hand, she repeatedly insists that the system of aparceria is thoroughly capitalist in character and that the principal benefi- ciary of the super-exploitation she describes is COLTABACO. Salazar the theoretician thus views the system as basically capitalist in nature and COLTABACO's financial-in- dustrial capital the main culprit: "The pre- vailing forms of sharecropping in tobacco production in the region hide the capitalist character that in reality characterizes this production .... What we have here is a transfer of surplus value that the company extracts from the producers." Salazar the fieldworker, however, describes in extraordi- nary detail and sophistication, the complex and varied forms of precapitalist forms of production. Moreover, in places, she admits that aparceria is fundamentally a pre- capitalist form of production and that COL- TABACO "extracts surplus value from the producers, the majority of them sharecrop- pers, through precapitalist forms of production." This ambivalence has some unfortunate effects for it leads her to deemphasize the roles land tenure and landlords play in the region. To her credit, she provides a great deal of information on the highly unequal nature of land tenure and describes in detail the ways in which landlords exploit their sharecroppers. But she fudges the issue and seems unwilling to draw the relevant conclusion that landlords (many of them absentee) are are also prime beneficiaries of the system. At any rate, Salazar provides no analysis or data to prove to the reader that COLTABACO benefits more. Her claim that both landlords and sharecroppers are exploited by COLTABACO is not docu- mented or even analyzed, simply asserted. Actually, the classic capitalism versus feudalism dilemma in the case of share- cropping is a false one to begin with. It makes much more sense to view the kinds of aparceria Salazar describes as Marx himself did, as a transitional form of pro- duction neither wholly feudal nor wholly capitalist. Salazar quotes Marx approvingly on this at one point, but seems unwilling in practice to follow his depiction of share- cropping as falling between classic primi- tive feudal extraction of surplus and capitalist rent. Fortunately, in the tension between Sal- azar the theoretician and Salazar the field- worker, the latter clearly wins out. She duly reports enough information to see that her sharecroppers live in the worst of all possi- ble worlds, for they serve two masters- quasi-feudal landlords and thoroughly cap- italist COLTABACO. Aparceros are thus caught between the precapitalist extraction of surplus from peasants and capitalist ex- ploitation though monopsonistic contract buying of leaf tobacco. The sharecropper pays both land rent and a transfer of surplus value through monopsony. As she herself recognizes, a true capitalist farmer could not pay such "double" rents; the difference between what a (still exploited) capitalist farmer could pay and what the peasant ap- arcero pays is the "peasant surplus" expro- priated by the landholder, the quasi-feudal component of the double exploitation the aparcero suffers. Salazar's analysis of the demographic dy- namics and the aparcero family as a micro- production unit is a self-contained gem of rural sociology. She shows how micro- economic rationality means the larger the family's workforce, the larger the family's potential labor contribution and, hence, the greater the possibility of obtaining a larger plot. Since the marginal cost of the indi- vidual family member declines with family size, out-migration of older children occurs, and a larger family tends to ensure the so- cial security and protection of older mem- bers, aparceros' economic optimum leads them to have the biological maximum of children. The very high labor intensity of tobacco production accentuates this ten- dency in spite of its manifest social, ecologi- cal and psychological contradictions found in poor mental and physical development, poverty, etc. Salazar's historical perspective allows her to show how COLTABACO functions as a "private government" in tobacco produc- tion, not so very different from the colonial monopoly, or, for the matter, the govern- ment's agencies of the 1950s and 1960s. She shows how various agrarian reform at- tempts (dating from the 1930s) have had counterproductive results. And she shows us the "dark side" of nationally-owned in- dustrial production in Colombia as op- posed to the transnational corporations' more "modern," more obviously capitalist production. Readers should be forewarned, however, that Salazar's analysis covers only the pe- riod up to 1977. Much of that analysis may now be relatively obsolete. There have been extraordinary changes in the Colombian to- bacco industry in the last six to seven years, including a dramatic rise in light tobacco production, an adverse shift in fortunes for COLTABACO, increasing contraband in TNC cigarettes, etc. Salazar's neglect of the wider contours of the industry sometimes obscures important considerations; for ex- ample, she does not mention that the state (through cigarette taxes) is a major benefi- ciary of exploitation in addition to consum- ers and COLTABACO. And the accelerating trend to light tobacco and other develop- ments have undoubtedly had great impact on the region. Therefore, aparceria seems today to belong more to the past than to the present. l CAIBBEAN rEVIEW/37 '-'in V."', -I ~xyj t~ I I * *n. fd- . S *H f.. Q |-^ - Bu'il'3iq me Panama C 3nal I ta. '~,~1 i'.- ~ ----- -1-1 -^9 "g""' .f fg'^l : ^.r- ; ^<.^ |' i a t- Panama Wounded A Poet's Reaction Reviewed by Luis M. Quesada Reconstrucci6n de los hechos, Manuel Orestes Nieto. INAC, Panama, 1972. Dar la cara, Manuel Orestes Nieto. Ediciones Libreria Cultural Panamefla, 1977. In Reconstrucci6n de los hechos, prize-winning Panamanian poet Manuel Orestes Nieto expresses sadness, bitter- ness against his own impotence in not being co-owner of his country: "and that the country that one takes everywhere / is stepped on opened up just to see what's inside" Nieto's most consistent and effec- tive image is that of the land divided. This division is not a voluntary one; it is a daily symbol to the thinking man representing the exploitation of his country. There is a touch of virile sadness when he concludes a poem with a single dramatic sentence, rem- iniscent of Antonio Machado's controlled emotion, to further raise the intensity level of his feelings: "and these locks closing in front of the soul with the sun blazing high." Another image derives from this idea of impotency, of his soul coming apart, torn at the sight of the canal locks in their endless daily movement. We find a conscious and deliberate decision to take a stand, to even- tually "dar la cara": "until one comes to a halt / flees no longer runs no more / con- fronts decides / and awaits the command to shoot." Reconstrucci6n de los hechos serves as a prelude to understand the daily anguish of sensitive men who react to this "fifth cardinal point," the Canal Zone. The poetry of Manuel Orestes Nieto is but an artistic reflection of this situation and its ramifications in daily Panamanian life. Dar la cara is a vivid denunciation of the raping of his country by what the poet terms, "El enemigo comun." The title Luis M. Quesada is an international marketing specialist in Miami. He translated the poetry in this article into English. translates "to face up," "to confront," or, as the poet himself states in Reconstrucci6n de los hechos, to run no more, to come to a halt, and finally to fight. The main theme or governing idea of Dar la cara, already sketched in Recon- struccion de los hechos, is that of a land divided. These very same words in English constituted the motto for the now defunct Panama Canal Company: "The land di- vided, the world united." Nieto sees this as an equivalent of original sin, the original rape of his fatherland. This is most evident in one of the best compositions of the book, "Tanques en el puente" (Tanks on the bridge). Here Nieto is referring to the bridge over the Canal, which has been appropri- ately named by Panama as the "Bridge of the Americas," but which the US had named Thatcher's Ferry Bridge, honoring the gentlemen who ran the ferry prior to the existence of the bridge. This bridge, which is a vital link in the Inter-American Highway, was owned, maintained, and under the ju- risdiction of the Canal Zone authorities. Any Panamanian going to the interior of his own country had to drive over this bridge and be subject to US jurisdiction. It was not infrequent to have US military troops on maneuvers going back and forth over the bridge, with priority given to their movements, requiring regular traffic to stop. One such incident is what Nieto re- ferred to in the poem. He is returning to the city and realizes that: "but to enter the city means to go through / the canal miles / from the town ofArraijan to the old Chor- rillo / one day you return from the beaches / and the mouth to your city is a bridge / which attempts to close a very large wound." First he stresses the idea of a daily occurrence; it could be any day, when one had to go through part of one's country that was really not one's own. Then the daily tragedy and anguish is reinforced by the image of a wound, a wound too large for healing, and the futile, if not ridiculous, at- tempt of the bridge, like a gigantic metal band-aid, trying to close it. He further elab- orates when at the very top of the bridge, he is tormented by the thought that under- neath is "his country divided": "and over it / five imperial tanks / drive one after the other/five "zonian" tanks in route to their bases / five tanks from the empire in Latin America / five tanks all green with their white stars / five tanks U.S.A" To further intensify his impotence against this oppressive display of force, he ends the poem with the sad subtle quality mentioned before, in the form of the realization that these tanks, these very five tanks, are "five minutes away from your home / five min- utes away from your people / five minutes away from all the corners / where our dead men fell." The idea of this land divided in two "for the benefit of others" is persistent throughout the work: "it's not easy to live with an open fatherland / and the enemy conspiring / five hundred meters away from where you sleep." He reaches artistic height when he goes to the earth itself to support his condemna- tion, to the "land divided." The poem "Plead from the earth" establishes a direct relation- ship between the division of the land and the force needed to alter Mother Nature. "It is said that the earth should not have been parted / nor the continents parted / nor the men / nor the skin of any country / it is said that the divided land of my country / has intestinal pains for every ship that goes through / and each me- chanical lock that opens and closes / empty and full of seas / of both seas __ / from canals / and maritime wounds / which is to say the earth plead- ing / the rocks and the algae pleading / the fish and the dead dreams pleading / it is said that we have to state that the earth must be / one for the peace of the future sprouts / the subsoils / the children who will come expecting to control love / and life / and the horizon must also be one / without fractures / without patchings / without justifications." This feeling is magnified by the use of images that create definite impressions: "... it is a land divided where we say hello to each other from one bank to the other." Or the idea that the ships waiting in line to enter the canal are like "daggers orarmored scalpels." The idea of force comes across and is ironically presented as he recollects: CAirBBEAN PIVIEW/39 THE INSTITUTE OF INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS announces the publication of its OCCASIONAL PAPER SERIES The purpose of the OCCA- SIONAL PAPER SERIES is to provide a forum for discussion of research carried out by Caribbean and International Scholars on various aspects of the interna- tional relations of the Caribbean and Latin America. Occasional Paper 1: Financial Constraints and Economic Develop- ment in the Commonwealth Carib- bean: the Recent Experience, by Ramesh Ramsaran, (February 1983). Occasional Papers 2 & 3: The Car- ibbean Basin and Recent Develop- ments in the Law of the Sea; and Human Rights in the Commonwealth Caribbean: an International Rela- tions Perspective, by Anselm Francis (April 1983). Occasional Paper 4: The Theory of Caribbean Economy: Origins and Current Status, by Eric St. Cyr (Oc- tober 1983). PRICE: US $4.00 (including postage) Prepayment is required and cheques should be made payable to: THE INSTITUTE OF INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS The University of the West Indies, St. Augustine, Republic of Trinidad and Tobago. Manuscripts are welcome. They should be no longer than 45 dou- blespaced typewritten pages and should be sent in duplicate to: The Editor, Occasional Paper Series, Institute of International Relations, University of the West Indies, St. Augustine, Republic of Trinidad and Tobago. "because in my country / there is a foreign governor / who watches over the wound so that it does not heal / for the sake of 'A Canal flor the benefit of the world.'" Finally the poem ends with the characteristic note of virile sadness, perhaps of impotence: "and because in our country / there is a strip of black and humid land / as a long aquatic avenue / full of mourning and rancor" In the last poem of the book, titled "Se trata de nosotros" (It's about us), Nieto goes after the average man, who is tempted to put aside all that has happened, perhaps pretending that it has nothing to do with him, acting as an ostrich waiting for it all to end: "it's all about this humble story / it's about this uneven land this broken land / these scratches / this pulling the rug from under us / it's all about us humiliated rejected / taken by assault / it's about us who are hungry / who have no pots to clank / it's mostly and above all about us / who have set out to be on time / to our meeting place / alive to life / and earthly to our land." Streets Without People Nieto gives us highly colorful impressions of his city. Individual poems not only por- tray daily occurrences in Panamanian life as related to the Canal Zone, but also are po- etic units within themselves. One poem, "Estas calls que nadie habitat" (These streets that nobody inhabits), is striking. Any Latin, any European who loves his city and neighborhood, is immediately im- pressed upon a first visit to the US. A drive through a residential section, or the com- mercial district after business hours, is rem- iniscent of a classic western movie scene: the arrival and ride through a ghost town. The Canal Zone, being Little America circa 1930, proves no less. This impresses the average Panamanian, and particularly our poet, who reacts to this with his poetic sen- sitivity, and creates an almost Dali-type sur- realistic setting: "It would seem that no one lives on these streets /....... / here no human being goes by / each beer can is picked up at the programmed hour / and at the programmed place / each bite to eat / comes out of the vending ma- chines / with precision / with the exact number ofo unces / for the exact calories / military bases fenced by unending 'no trespassing.'" The grotesque and almost inhuman efficiency and automation is pic- tured by the poet, in a subconscious con- trast with his streets which are full of noise, of people alive and bustling. Nieto delves into daily situations and problems; the border-line street, the "limit" as it is known, between the Canal Zone and the city of Panama. This is a most curious situation, well worth explaining: imagine a rather large four-lane avenue which leads to the bridge of the Americas; since it was built by the Americans, the avenue itself was within the jurisdiction of the Canal Zone, and so was the sidewalk on the Canal Zone side. Yet the sidewalk on the Panamanian side was not within this jurisdiction; it is really a most important part of the city of Panama. As a result, in a section approx- imately two kilometers long, on the Pan- amanian side we find a tremendous variety of businesses catering to the American community just across the street. During the day, many stores deal in handcrafts from the Orient, electronic equipment and fine linens and tablecloths; at night a most varied display of bars, "boites" and night spots cater their services and those of their young female employees to the American soldier across the street. That is precisely the world into which Nieto goes and which he recreates in a most plastic and vivid im- pression depicting the US influence on his country, even on himself: "One evening you forget all about poetry / or at least you want to forget it /.... / and it so happens that you go to the city / and go into one of those bars within the 'limit' / immersing yourself in neon lights and whores /... / you go to the pinball machine / and start playing the game of bumping cars / but they bump / and the machine kicks out your error / and you look all around you / and realize that you are surrounded by gringos / and say something to yourself like: 'These gringos all they do is come across / come over the fence / to take our women' / but then another phrase hits you: / 'These gringos when they come across / they don't even take our women any more / because here we now only have Colombians / Nicaraguans, Costa Ricans or Salvadorans / or imported from other worlds / to the capital for the con- crete / business of evening and dollars.'" The semi-Dantesque world that Nieto portrays only causes desperation and im- potence. The poet himself has been caught by this creeping cultural imperialism in his constant attachment to the pinball machine while examining this world around him. He realizes this and bluntly states "here even dreams have become commercial" and finally has to go back to this poetry, to read- ing "Paz ya sin paz" so that he then can seriously think: "how it would be in heaven / with its ministers angels and archangels / and 'my God' in person / discussing a Canal dominated by Satan." The poet loses faith: he wants action; he can no longer be in peace reading his poetry and thinking in terms of abstractions. He emphasizes this in "My tenderness is hard- ening up on me": "and tenderness inside hardened rock / tendernessjail / dry tend- erness hard to swallow uneasy / tender- ness bullet hitting at me." Nieto's zeal and artistry make his work a living document: daily happenings clash di- rectly with a poet's sensitivity. D 401/CA?BBEAN REVIEW The Charmed World of Manuel Lepe Primitive Art by A Mexican Master By Bea Bender Innocence, sensitivity and honesty per- meate each of Manuel Lepe's creations. These same qualities are also a part of his everyday life. His canvases are beau- tifully decorated surfaces capturing the minute details of complex urban and coun- try scenes, swarming with little people at work and play. Each is filled with stylized palm trees, tropical flowers, birds, but- terflies, tile roofed houses, thatched huts, plazas, churches, burros, dogs, boats, air- planes but never a hotel or a soft drink sign. "The progress of civilization takes away so much of the natural beauty and quality of things," says Lepe. His paintings communi- cate his deep feelings for the simple unfet- tered life of his native village of Puerto Vallarta. His style demonstrates a strong decora- tive flair, a vivid sense of primitive reality. A touch of fantasy gives each of his works a popular nationalistic appearance. There is a kinship with the primitive Mexican paintings of his ancestors. One can speculate that his art form was influenced by the amate paper paintings of the Huapance Indians: the well- known folk art on bark paper scrolls with flowers, animals and scenes of village life mixed with abstract designs done in bright pigments from tropical flowers, berries and insects. His unique enchanting style glorifies the exuberant innocence of child- hood. His compositions capture the antics of boys and girls with innocent smiling faces in a dream world, playing circle games, riding boats and parachutes, swim- ming and fishing. He even gives children the gift of flight; with wings they fly through the air in and out of his landscapes. Lepe says that he paints children in his works because it provides a way for him to live the childhood he never had. He is particularly noted for this honest treatment of the children of Mexico and is inclined to be very nationalistic in his inter- pretation. "The children are not the same everywhere in Mexico," says Lepe. "The children of Guadalajara are different from the Chamula children and the children from Bea Bender is an art critic in Puerto Vallarta, Mexico. Manuel Lepe Tijuana are different from the Otomi chil- dren." His children are depicted in dress indigenous to the region of their origin in a background of corresponding landscapes. Thus, in his scenes of the mountain town of San Crist6bal de las Casas, the children wear huaraches and flat brimmed hats with colorful streamers, as the beach children of Vallarta are barefooted. At times, Lepe handles his pigments with restraint and delicacy, using pastel blues, pinks, oranges and yellows mixed in sur- prising and ingenious combinations. At other times, his colors seem to explode in vibrant yellows, sharp jungle greens, magentas, hot pinks, fiery reds and sap- phire blues. Free of shadows and half- tones, there is a sense of proportion and a harmony between the most daring clash of colors. Using a variety of media (oils, water- colors, acrylics, pastels, limestone) he con- structs pictoral poems and treats the minute details and colors in the form of superimposed planes without losing the rhythm and balance of the composition. Lepe was born in 1936 in Puerto Vallarta, Jalisco, a small village of fishermen and corn farmers. He began drawing and paint- ing when he was a young boy. "I was always scribbling and scratching in my school notebooks. No one ever showed me how. I was always drawing little figures of people, scenes of daily life and customs: puebla-like men on burros, women washing clothes in the river, children enjoying a festive piiata. Wherever I went I would stop and scribble on candy wrappers or little scraps of found paper," he reminisces. His schooling was limited to the fourth grade. Although he won awards and recognition in school for his outstanding artistic talent, he never re- ceived a diploma. The oldest of twelve brothers and sisters, his education was cut short so that he could help in the family grocery. His father tried to discourage his pursuit of an art career, fortunately to no avail. He sold his first drawings-made on wrapping paper from his father's store-for as little as twenty to thirty pesos. In his early works, simple biblical characters like Adam and Eve, Noah in the Ark, Jonah and the whale were interwoven with the little people of his fantasized paradise in Puerto Vallarta. He says that he has lost track of how many paintings he has done and that his fame grew faster than his accumulation of pesos. Commissions from hotels, restaurants, government agencies and private collec- tors for his paintings soon, however, kept him occupied beyond his capacity to fulfill the demand. Today, with his world-wide rep- utation, his originals are worth thousands of dollars and his signed seriographs sell for hundreds. While still in his early twenties, Manuel Lepe spent several years in the Chiapas and Oaxacan mountains, among the Indian population where he gathered other artist friends around him. When he returned to Puerto Vallarta, he married and had three children. His love for his own children can be seen in his painting called "Laura's chil- dren" and others of that period. Later, dur- ing a divorce, he turned to religion for comfort and did an outstanding "Madonna and Child" series. The mother and child are adorned in rich blue brocade and white lace with sparkling mirrors and metal flowers appliqued in the background. Fragments of CAI?BBEAN IEVIEW/41 "Adam y Eva en el Paraiso," oil on canvas with collage of embroidered flowers, 120 x 80 cm. the design appear randomly on the border and frame as his enthusiasm spills out over the picture. In 1975, Manuel Lepe was designated as Mexico's National Painter by President Luis Echeverria. The National Council and Sec- retaria de Turismo of Mexico have taken great interest in Lepe's talent. His litho- graphs, seriographs, posters and pam- phlets have been widely used for national public education in Mexico and for special promotions in Europe, Africa and Latin America. Since 1965, Manuel Lepe has had nu- merous public exhibitions and private shows in several large cities of the United States, Canada and Latin America. An im- portant exhibition of 185 canvases was held in 1979 at the California Museum of Sci- ence and Industry in Los Angeles. Recently he has had several successful one-man shows: Nuevo Laredo Museum, Yolanda Gallery in Chicago, Galeria Uno in Puerto Vallarta. His last show was held in 1982 in Seattle to celebrate "Children's Day" for the benefit of that city's Children's Orthopedic Hospital. The artistic quality and popular appeal of Lepe's happy art has enchanted discerning 42/CAIBBcAN rEVIEW "Rio Cuole," oil on canvas, 100 x 80 cm. collectors everywhere. His works are in art collections of world leaders such as former German Chancellor Willy Brandt, President Fidel Castro of Cuba and the Queen of En- gland. His canvases hang in many embas- sies around the world. "In spite of being profoundly nationalistic, Lepe's work can cross with ease any frontier and conquer any human being that, like Lepe himself, is capable of making beauty and truth a part of himself," says Jose Luis Meza Inda, Mex- ican art critic and friend. Plans and projects for the immediate fu- ture are now in abeyance because of his poor health. Since December 1982, Lepe has undergone surgery to relieve the effects of a stroke, but with little improvement. In response to popular demand, Martin Kroll, a New York art dealer, and Rodrigo Lepe, the artist's brother and manager, in cooperation with Jan Lavender of Galeria Uno, have scheduled a retrospective show for the Los Angeles-Southwest area of the US in the fall of 1983. A folio of seriographs signed in print depicting the hallmarks of Lepe's artis- tic endeavors may be available for the 1984 holiday season. One of the UNICEF Christ- mas cards this year will be Lepe's "Arbol de Navidad." [ "La Iglesia," oil on canvas, 80 x 80cm. CARfBBEAN r'EVIW/43 Journal of THE TOCQUEVILLE SOCIETY LA SOCIETY TOCQUEVILLE A bilingual quarterly journal of social history and current affairs in France and the United States. Published by the Tocqueville Society since 1979. Subscription rates: Individuals $20 Institutions $24 Single issues $6 Membership in the Society is by nomination. Please address correspondence (from the U.S.) Professor Franklin Mendels, Associate Secretary, U.S. 706 Administration Building University of Maryland, Baltimore Country Catonsville, Maryland 21228 (from Europe) Professor Henri Mendras, Associate Secretary, France 69 quai D'Orsay 75007 Paris, France Manuscripts should be forwarded to: Jesse R. Pitts, Editor Dept. of Sociology and Anthropology Oakland University Rochester, Mi 48063 Some papers from recent issues: Lawrence Wylie and Sarella Henriquez, French Images of American Life Herbert Landier, La situation syndicale en France John Shy, Yorktown 1781, Personalities and Documents Jer6me Jaffr6, La Politique Etrangbre et LOpinion Frangaise Theodore Caplow, The Sociologi- cal Myth of Family Decline Raymond Aron, Tocqueville Retrouv6 William Schonfeld, Scenes de la vie politique frangaise Stanley Hoffmann, Some Notes on Democratic Theory and Practice Jean-Marcel Jeanneney, Continuity et changement dans le gouvernement de la France Henri Mendras, An Optimistic View of France Sylvain Wickham, La tentation post-industrielle en France Seymour Lipset, Whither the First new Nation? FranQois Bourricaud, Cotradition et Traditions chez Tocqueville Status... Continued from page 3 the current 20 percent unemployment rate. This situation will almost certainly affect the ongoing debate on political status. Re- cently a number of initiatives have come to light in Washington, some of them pro- posed by Puerto Ricans active in the status debate. One is a proposal to create a Select Committee on Puerto Rico in the Senate, and there is a similar proposal in the House of Representatives. Perhaps of greater im- portance is the suggestion that Congress establish the parameters within which the status decision would be made in the island. In other words, Congress would define the conditions for the granting of statehood, independence, or a modified common- wealth status. Although these proposals have generally been well received in Puerto Rico, the last one has been running into more and more questioning. It appears to be based on the assumption that Congress acts rationally or, at least, with the common good in mind. If this were so, there would be no problem in delegating to Congress the definition of the status issue. In fact, however, members of Congress act on the basis of local pressures, PR and the US... Continued from page 7 adequate for the mainland. Internationally, Puerto Rico has become a persistent bone of contention between the Third World and the United States. Its case is a fixed item on the agenda of the UN Decolonization Com- mittee and in almost all meetings of the nonaligned countries. The situation has become nearly desper- ate. Governor Romero Barcelo6 has stated that if reelected in 1984 he would put the US Congress to the test by calling a plebiscite in Puerto Rico. If the people vote for statehood, he will confront Congress with such a peti- tion, including three conditions: (1) that re- tention of the Spanish language is not negotiable; (2) that a fiscal transition of 20 years allow the gradual application of federal taxes; (3) that the US government assume Puerto Rico's public debt. Such declarations cannot be taken lightly when made by the governor of Puerto Rico speaking in his official capacity. If such an action is carried out, it will spell trouble for the mainland government. Moreover in making his declaration, the governor is overlooking the real problem which is that in its present condition, Puerto Rico cannot responsibly exercise its right to self-deter- ideological prejudices, budgetary consid- erations and electoral or political needs. It would be too serious a risk for the island to entrust the definition of its future to such a political lottery. In a recent Washington seminar on Puerto Rico, a participant who had been a high-ranking state department official during the Carter administration in- dicated that, as long as Puerto Rico was a strategic resource for the US, he did not see how independence could be considered a viable alternative. If this or any other of the three status options is not to be given fair consideration by Congress, then the pro- posal is essentially dead. Puerto Rico is caught in a bind. The work- ings of the present economic model tie it inexorably to the United States. The failings of the model, which make the island a ward of the federal government, also make it im- possible to formalize adoption via state- hood. It looks, then, as if Puerto Rico will remain in its present political limbo for the foreseeable future, placed there not by de- sign, but by default. A new economic model is required to solve the most basic needs of the Puerto Rican people and to move the island from its political deadlock. This new model does not appear to be forthcoming from either of the major political parties. Thus the soap opera continues. We will be watching reruns decades from now. O mination. For what would people be voting? If they vote for statehood, how do they know Congress will allow retention of Spanish as the main language? How can they vote for independence without knowing whether Congress will provide some form of long- term economic assistance? Without an- swers to such questions, a plebiscite has little meaning. It should therefore be evident that this is not an issue to be solved by a badly timed plebiscite or other type of consultation, which in fact may do far more harm than good. What is needed is the honest desire of both parties to engage in discussions lead- ing to a major revision in the US-Puerto Rican relationship. After more than 30 years it is time for such action. The new relation- ship must make Puerto Rico autonomous so that it will have the power needed to reenter the road towards true economic, so- cial and political development. By so doing, the US will spare itself a difficult problem- domestically, internationally or both. Even more important, by so doing the two countries-Puerto Rico and the United States-will be living up to their tradition of friendship based on their common respect for the enduring human values of democ- racy, equity, respect for justice and fairness. They will be setting an extraordinary exam- ple that, even in today's turbulent world, di- alogue and peaceful agreement based on mutual respect is still possible. More worthy a purpose is hard to envision. D 44/CAIBBEAN rEVIEW Haiti... Continued from page 15 cent of the Indian indentured laborers in Trinidad and Guyana up to 1917; church groups and humanitarian agencies have re- cently protested against the system. Also, the presence of these migrants is resented by Dominican workers who see it as under- cutting the wage rates of the country. It is possible that things will change, as the gov- ernment party in the Dominican Republic is dependent on financial aid from social democratic parties in West Germany, France and Scandinavia who could bring pressure, cutting off a substantial source of revenue for the Haitian government. Nev- ertheless the Dominican government also has a strong financial interest in maintain- ing the system. With respect to the "boat people," the US appears to believe that it is in its interest to come to some agreement with the Haitian government to prevent this migration. The cooperation of the Duvalier regime has been sought, and US vessels have been patrolling the northern waters off the island of Hispaniola to prevent Haitians from leav- ing. Both governments have been criticized for this policy. Liberals in the US have at- tacked their government, while Haitian na- tionalists (some of whom had supported the Duvalier regime in the past) have been incensed by this humiliating situation. Al- though the crisis appears to have tem- porarily strengthened the hand of Duvalier in dealing with Washington, it may well be that a future administration in the White House will think that there is a more satis- factory way of coping with the phenomenon and cease supporting a corrupt and op- pressive government. One important consequence of the mi- gration is that considerable sums of money are being sent home to relatives all over Haiti by those who have worked abroad for some time (particularly those in the US). It is impossible to assess accurately the amount of money arriving this way, but it is estimated that $32 million entered Haiti in this manner each year in the late 1970s. These remittances have significantly im- proved the situation of countless families throughout Haiti and have, incidentally, helped the country's balance of payments. Although Frangois Duvalier had come to some kind of compromise with most of the business elite, the foundation of his power structure remained the black middle classes. In this respect, there has been a major change in Duvalierism. The regime of Jean-Claude has come increasingly to de- pend upon elite support, and his wooing of this group has alienated many of the noiristes. A number of macoute leaders in recent years have voiced disquiet with events, and some of them no longer see any probability of future benefits. They are thus unwilling to stick their necks out very far to preserve a government from which they have little, if anything, to gain. The marriage of Jean- Claude to Michele Bennett, the daughter of a rich and ruthless mulatto businessman, sealed these developments. While it is un- likely that these erstwhile Duvalierist sup- porters will initiate a revolution, they can now no longer be depended upon to resist a serious attempt to overthrow the government. The elite is much less dependable than the black middle classes. Composed of many groups which live off the state, its members expect the government to ensure that their standard of living is maintained. If it fails to do this, they are likely to look around for other presidential possibilities. Up to now the government, thanks largely to US aid, has been able to satisfy the elite, but for how much longer? While Frangois Duvalier used the black classes intermediaire to control the rural masses, the present government has at- tempted to appeal over their heads to the people themselves. This has been done partly by means of popular radio stations such as Radio Nationale, which has encour- aged ordinary Haitians to make known their grudges against the incompetence and cor- ruption of local officials. The move has met with a considerable response, but it has fur- ther alienated local macoute leaders, chefs de section and other rural functionaries. The setting up of conseils commu- nautaires and the activities of Le Comite National d'Action Jeanclaudiste (CONA- JEC) have been further moves in the en- deavor to reestablish grassroots support for the regime. These populist ploys are, how- ever, likely in the long run to weaken rather than strengthen the regime. A key factor, of course, is the position of the armed forces. Haiti has a long tradition of militarism in politics. Independence was secured by military action, and from 1804 to 1913, the head of state was invariably a military officer. One of the avowed objec- tives of the US occupation was to remove the army from politics, but soon after the departure of the Marines in 1934, the mili- tary began to reassert its traditional role. In 1946 a triumvirate of army officers took over the country, and after just four years of civilian rule, the same junta stepped in to ensure the termination of President Es- time's period in office. For the next six years, the country was ruled by an army officer, and in the disturbed period from the fall of Magloire in 1956 to the accession of Fran- cois Duvalier, the army's role was crucial. By a series of carefully designed moves, the new president dealt effectively with the dan- ger of a military coup. Senior officers were changed frequently; new men-mostly blacks-were promoted to high positions, and the various branches of the military and paramilitary apparatus were carefully bal- anced, with their hierarchies meeting only at the presidential level. By 1964 Duvalier could claim, with some justification, "I have removed from the army its role of arbiter... of national life." Today the armed forces number about 7,000, with half of them composing the po- lice. There are a few hundred in the navy and air force, and the remaining men are divided between the Cassernes Dessalines, the Presidential Guard (with roughly 800 each) and the L4opards, a more recently- formed brigade which is somewhat better trained and equipped than the rest of the armed forces, numbering about 600. While it is always possible that in the future army officers will play an independent role in the political process, there are certain institu- tional safeguards against their initiating a revolution at the present time. Each branch keeps a check on the others, and the mac- outes, in turn, remain a considerable counterforce. A number of recent clashes between macoutes and members of the armed forces suggest that relations between them are frequently strained. Though it would be unwise to rule out the possibility of a mili- tary coup, it does not at the moment look likely. What is less clear is the role that vari- ous branches of the armed forces might play in the event of a serious invasion or a large-scale popular movement against the government. The performance of the armed forces in subduing the 1982 "inva- sion" of the island of La Tortue, by less than a dozen exiles, does not suggest that they are a particularly efficient and reliable but- tress. A recent revision of the constitution, making provision for the appointment of a successor to President Jean-Claude Du- valier has led to speculation about the state of his health. Elections for a new assembly have been managed in such a way as to minimize any manifestation of discontent. The long-term prospects for the regime re- main, however, questionable. By shifting the base of his support to the elite, Jean-Claude has placed himself in a vulnerable position, particularly with re- spect to the United States. While the father was able to resist enormous pressure from the Kennedy regime in the early 1960s, it is unlikely that the son could survive such pressure today. With President Reagan in the White House he is perhaps safe from this quarter and even feels able to ignore US sensibilities, as he did recently in the sack- ing of Marc Bazin. Nevertheless, with a US president less tolerant of dictatorship, cor- ruption and torture, foreign aid might be withdrawn, and the regime of Baby Doc, with its recently acquired feet of clay, would be likely to totter and fall. O cAiBBEAN FEVIEw/45 First-Time... Continued from page 23 ing); but more important, it provided a cru- cial source of new questions. With time, Tebini, like several other elders, was willing to discuss almost any First-Time issue, but neither he nor the others often brought up a "new" issue on their own. An important part of my job, then, became the discovery of fragments or traces, puzzles or songs (some overheard in proverbs or witnessed at rites, some found in the archives) that would spark a reaction. By 1978, Tebini was old enough to be physically and psychologically up one day and down the next, but he had truly come to enjoy our nighttime exchanges. Whenever Tebini got really excited about a story he was telling me, seeing me writing (and never fully clear about how tape recorders worked), he'd say, "Friend. Take it down exactly. Because some day you will 'tell it' [in a book]." This aura of collegiality-mutual respect always tempered by an appropriate mea- sure of reticence-marked my historical conversations with a number of other men besides Tebini and Peleki. With each of these men I developed complex relations, many spanning a twelve-year period. In- deed, with these people it would be more accurate to envision a series of intermit- CAnBBCAN vW AWARD We are pleased to accept nominations for the fifth annual Caribbean Review Award, an annual presentation to honor an indi- vidual who has contributed to the advance- ment of Caribbean intellectual life. The award recognizes individual effort ir- respective of field, ideology, national origin, or place of residence. The Award Committee consists of: Lambros Comitas (Chairman), Columbia University, New York; Fuat Andic, Univer- sidad de Puerto Rico, San Juan, Puerto Rico; Wendell Bell, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut; Locksley Edmondson, University of the West Indies, Mona, Ja- maica; Anthony P. Maingot, Florida Interna- tional University, Miami, Florida. Nominations are to be sent to the Editor, Caribbean Review, Florida International University, Miami, Florida 33199. Nomina- tions must be received by 31 March 1984. The Fifth Annual Award will be an- nounced at the Ninth Annual Meeting of the Caribbean Studies Association to be held in St. Kitts, 30 May-2 June 1984. In addition to a plaque the recipient receives an hono- rarium of $250, donated by the International Affairs Center of Florida International University. tent/interrupted conversations that con- tinued over the years than more standard anthropological "interviews." Through time, as my own knowledge grew, I set aside certain former interests in favor of others that began to emerge as more important. The chronological development of my dis- cussions with any of these men is a record of deepening understanding and mutual comprehension. With each of them, I even- tually enjoyed relations that permitted a se- rious exchange of ideas about First-Time. There were, however, other research en- counters marked more by mistrust and fear than collegiality, and I would be remiss not to give them their full due here as well. In certain villages where I had been known only by reputation, I was greeted with inter- est and cooperation. In other such villages, however, where I had come to spend a few days, I met polite hospitality combined with a firm determination not to cooperate. Trav- eling with a Saramaka friend (sometimes accompanied by Sally)-that is, without the non-Saramaka entourage considered nor- mal for outsiders-I presented each new village with an anomaly: a white man who not only spoke their language well but was familiar, in certain respects more so than they, with details of their own people and places and battles that had been hidden from whitefolks for centuries. Listening later with Matjau friends to some of the tapes from these downriver sessions, I came to realize just how frightened some of these groups of elders were of me and of my knowledge. And I was also reminded, again, just how strong First-Time ideology re- mains, and the extent to which it lends deep meaning and dignity to these men's lives. What I learned in such situations was always less than I hoped; fear is hardly conducive to truth-telling. Nevertheless, I occasionally sowed seeds that later bore fruit, as when a man subsequently came to me alone to talk seriously, or when I picked up fragments of stories I was later able to fill out in detail with other people. When I appeared in such a village, having first sent word ahead, I was always direct in stating my intentions, once the appropriate small talk and exchange of gifts had been completed. I would then be asked to pro- ceed, and it was usually only after the next several minutes that my hosts really began to realize, with mixed amazement and fear, what was at hand. I usually opened with a relatively neutral fact that Ithought would particularly interest them, something I had found in the ar- chives but which they might not have pre- served in detail. In the case of the Nasi clan, for example, I discussed their first two post- Treaty captains' staffs. The aged Aseedu an- swered (formally addressing one of the younger men) in a rhetoric typical of such encounters: "Well, you know? We can't say it's not true. You know why? His 'ancestor' [the pen and notebook] is in his hand. But ours are no longer here. We know nothing, really. Whitefolks know everything. Look at us here. We just don't know the truth any more. If he has things to tell us, let him speak. But it's not that we have anything we can tell him. Let him speak. Our own elders simply never taught us." [And he continued in this vein for several minutes.] In such situations, after sharing with my hosts a series of facts, I might ask a ques- tion. For example, with an Abaisa group, at this same stage of an initial interview, I asked about where their ancestors had "walked" in their migration from slavery. There was embarrassed laughter; then an old man said, "This thing. We won't find it!" And another chimed in, "Let him just keep telling us." When I pleaded that they must contribute as well, I was met by further pro- testations of ignorance: "If only you had come here in the days when people knew things. Our oldfolks are all dead and gone; we who are left on this earth know nothing at all." But even the most frustratingly guarded encounters sometimes eventuated in im- portant sharing of knowledge. In one of my initial discussions with members of the Abaisa clan, which truly seemed to be going nowhere, I finally told a detailed story about Abaisa ancestors that I had heard from other Saramakas, asking them at its con- clusion whether it matched their own traditions. [Old man:] So you've heard. [I:] So I've heard. [O:] So you've heard. [long silence] Basia [assistant headman], have you heard this? [Basia LIntifaya:] No, I haven't heard this .... [Mumbling:] But the one about slavery times. That I've heard. [Younger man:] I will ask the man here. Did the woman [their apical ancestress, Ma Kaala, whom I had just been telling them about] come out of Africa with her husband? [/:] I don't know; it's not in the "book." But I have heard that his name was Father-in- law Andol&e. [B, in amazement:] Exactly! [I:] But I still don't understand what the "slavery" story is. [B:] That is it. [silence] [I:] But I want to know what happened. [silence] [B:] You want to know it. [I:] Yes, I want to know it. [silence] [B, to others:] He wants to know it. [Others:] He wants to know it. [long silence] [B, finally, clearing his throat:] Well, what we've heard .... And he then proceeded to give me my full- est version ever of the Abaisa escape from slavery. These "difficult" encounters always left 46/CAIBBEAN FcVleV me emotionally drained, as they undoubt- edly did my reluctant hosts. My elderly D6mbi friend, Ameika, aptly remarked after the officials of his village had forbidden him to discuss First-Time with me in 1978, "Ingi d66ng6 ma an lasi 6n amaka" ("The In- dian may be drunk but he still knows where his hammock is"). Ameika was saying that the officials may be foolish from one per- spective-after all, it is 1978, not 1778-but you have to give them credit for keeping their priorities straight, for not forgetting what really matters. As I hope to have made clear already, cooperation was always a matter of degree in my historical discus- sions with Saramakas, and the ideology of First-Time was never far from the surface. Toward those men who chose to have noth- ing to do with what must have seemed a dangerous and bizarre project, join Ameika in extending my respect. As I think back on my more difficult encounters or listen again to the tapes that are so frustrating if viewed solely from the perspective of gathering facts, I am struck by the overwhelming dig- nity of these quiet elderly men. If I learned less from them than I would have liked about First-Time, I learned from them something far more important. And I hope that my own conduct successfully reflected the grace and tact with which I was always treated, even by my sternest intellectual adversaries. Bookmaking It has been said of the late French ethnogra- pher Alfred Metraux that after traveling to the Amazon to become the student of his Indians, he used to return to Paris wanting nothing more than to become the Indian of his students. The complex process of "translation" between cultures that charac- terizes all ethnographic teaching and writ- ing becomes doubly problematical in a book like this one. The act of its creation embodies the selfsame paradox as a Saramaka elder telling a younger kinsman a fragment from First-Time. For traditional men, it is the supreme good to "know" (and a true pleasure to "learn"), but it is an equally grave danger to "tell." As Otjutju once mused: "There are certainpapasongs of which it is said, 'If you sing this you will die,' yet people still [must] sing them! .." Damned if they do (tell, sing), because of terrible perceived dangers, and damned if they don't, because the knowledge would be forever lost, Saramakas steer an un- steady middle course, reluctantly sharing partial disclosures with selected kinsmen. I faced a similar dilemma. Saramaka men are acutely aware of the ongoing and irreversible loss of knowledge; it is a vivid part of their own experience and the subject of frequent discussion among them. The decision to write First-Time was inextricably bound up with this histo- riographical process. The issues it raised for me ranged from the potential impact on the Saramaka system of knowledge of my cod- ifying in writing these particular fragments, to the potential consequences of identifying by name the men who had shared their knowledge with me. None of these issues are simple; all have a strong moral compo- nent, and only time will tell if my carefully considered decisions have been wise. Inso- far as possible, however, they were made with the advice and consideration of the people whose words are represented in the book. Consider the issue of identifying speak- ers by name. Twelve years ago, when I wrote There was a day in time when the last eyes to see Christ were closed forever. -Jorge Luis Borges my first book about Saramaka, there was simply no question; people made clear that they did not want their names to be written down in any "whitefolks' book," and- though I personally found the solution de- humanizing-I duly avoided using any names at all (when necessary, calling indi- viduals as well as clans "A," "B," "X," and so on). By the time of my 1978 discussions with contributors to this work, the issue had shifted: people were torn between aware- ness, on the one hand, of traditional sanc- tions against telling things to whitefolks and talking about First-Time to anyone not in their clan, and, on the other hand, pride in their own knowledge and that of their clan, and the wish to be remembered by their juniors as men of wisdom. While Sara- makas did not, and could not, fully under- stand the ultimate products of much of the kinds of general ethnographic information I explored with them during the 1960s (for example, articles on kinship theory or de- mography), they had a keen idea of how a book about First-Time might look. In regard to history, it was always much easier to be explicit about my goals-for example, comparing Saramaka versions to those found in contemporary archives; and as colleagues (however unequal in many and complex ways) we could join the search together. The solution I adopt in First-Time grows out of my discussions with Saramakas, but is clearly my own responsi- bility: in this work I identify speakers by their real names, with the sole exception of cases (regarding particular historical fragments) in which the speaker specifically asked to remain anonymous. Or, consider the potential impact of this book on the Saramaka system of knowl- edge. By presenting certain Saramaka ver- sions of events and not others, and by introducing contemporary written evi- dence, I run the risk of establishing a "can- onical" or "authorized" version of Sarama- ka history. My decision to publish is made with a strong sense of the speed with which First-Time knowledge is disappearing, with the reassurance that the main participants in my learning have approved publication, and with the expectation (based on past experience) that the book's contents will only very gradually and very partially pene- trate to those elders who most directly par- ticipate in the system of knowledge. Other related moral issues abound. There is the basic question of whether the publication of information that gains its symbolic power in part by being secret does not vitiate the very meaning of that informa- tion. Does publication of these stories, these very special symbols, fundamentally diminish their value and meaning? While a Saramaka elder always tells First-Time se- lectively, and carefully chooses his recip- ients, the publication of a book by its very nature deprives its author of control (except perhaps via the language in which it ap- pears) over its audience. It is inevitable that these stories will ultimately cross traditional clan boundaries in Saramaka; and all of them are being given, immediately and at once, to white and black outsiders, the tradi- tional collective enemy. These issues are as germane to small details as to major events. Consider the name of the great Matjau hero, Lanu, of whom it is said, "His name must never be spoken." Should it appear here? Tebini (and other elders) not only told me Lanu's name, they agreed to its publication. Tebini (as well as others) is in a sense especially entrusted with such knowledge and with its distribu- tion. Should I proceed on this authority? Or should I accept the view-which I could surely elicit from any number of Saramakas if I tried-that Tebini (and the others) have violated a trust and, in this sense, are "trai- tors"? Or again, the D6mbi captains of the village of Seei ordered Am6ika not to speak to me about First-Time in 1978, but other D6mbi officials-a captain and abasia in a nearby village-were pleased to contribute. By publishing their words, am I violating some trust with that first group? The ques- tion of "informed consent" in social science research-much debated recently by pro- fessional societies as well as congressional committees-becomes particularly thorny in anthropology: is it individuals or is it groups who constitute the appropriate unit for consent in terms of property that is in part corporate? How much knowledge of the outside world is necessary before con- sent becomes truly informed? None of these questions have simple an- swers. Some of them regress on more gen- eral questions of social science or anthropological ethics, and all refer back, ultimately, to philosophical and political positions. The responsibility for making these materials public, after I have consid- CA.?BBEAN Pv IEW/47 ered all these issues, must be mine alone. In addition, however, there are special respon- sibilities that devolve upon the readers of such a work, who by the very act of reading become partial custodians of its knowledge and potential power. A word about these may not be out of place here. I would wish to remind Saramakas who read or hear portions of this book to be sure not to treat it as a bible, but rather as an incomplete and early attempt to bring to- gether the fragments of First-Time knowl- edge that I have been able to learn. It is intended, ultimately, as a celebration of the Saramaka historiographical tradition, as an example of how collectively successful Saramakas have been in preserving a vi- sion of First-Time truths. And it is meant to encourage a whole new generation of Sara- maka historians to continue the search and to broaden and deepen our understanding. Likewise, I would want to urge outsiders (whether they are Surinamers, Dutch, Americans, or whatever) who in the course of their work or leisure come into contact with Saramakas to respect the special "un- speakable" status of this knowledge. For this group of readers, the book will have served its purpose if it brings greater re- spect for the historical accomplishments of CABBEAN is available in Microform. University Microfilms International Please send additional information for Name Institution Street City, State Zip_ 300 North Zeeb Road Dept. P.R. Ann Arbor. Mi. 48106 Saramakas and for their traditions of schol- arship. The knowledge itself, unlike that in a book on, say, social structure or art, is not intended to be discussed lightly with Saramakas. Discussion of this knowledge requires a special code and etiquette as well as a real facility with the language. When Tebini, for example, concluded that Lanu's name could be published, it was certainly on the assumption that it would not be spo- ken in Saramaka any more frequently than it is today. Very generously, he assumed that readers would share my own verbal discretion. And finally, for the very great majority of readers who will never have the opportunity to meet Saramakas except through books, this study is intended as a tribute to their dignity in the face of oppression, and to their continuous rejection of outsiders' at- tempts to define them as objects. It depicts, in their own words, a people fashioning against all odds a new world of their own making. They were ordinary men and women who were called upon to perform extraordinary deeds. And because of their accomplishments, all of us may consider ourselves the richer. In First-Time, my unit of analysis is the event. Taking fragments (often a mere phrase) from many different men, compar- ing them, discussing them with others, challenging them against rival accounts, and eventually holding them up against contemporary written evidence, I try to be- gin to develop a picture of what the most knowledgeable Saramakas collectively know, and why they know and preserve it. Constant comparison-challenging and discussing accounts of events with Saramakas-rather than passive text- gathering was my modus operandi. I quickly found out that information was stored or embedded in particular forms (songs, land tenure lists, and so on) and was often not available to the speaker in other forms. "Different people," as David Cohen matter-of-factly states of East African oral historians, "carry in their heads different modes and systems of arranging and sim- plifying the complex and massive informa- tion that the past remits to the living." If, for example, I asked Tebini the name of a cer- tain captain's successor, he might honestly deny knowledge, yet the information would turn out to be embedded in a song or a narrative fragment that he knew well, and would be told me weeks later apropos of something else. It was simply not recovera- ble for him in the form in which I had asked. Even the men most respected for their control of First-Time knowledge vary enor- mously in the depth and breadth of their repertoires, and what any Saramaka indi- vidual knows about the distant past is dis- tinctly idiosyncratic. Many elders, including some important captains, knew very little at all about pre-1762 history. And the very most knowledgeable men tend to know lit- tle beyond the web of interests that touches on their own, and sometimes their father's clan. All this leads to a paradox: much of the knowledge contained in the book would amaze (and be new to) any single living Saramaka; yet, at the same time, I am quite certain that it represents only the very tip of the iceberg that Saramakas collectively pre- serve about First-Time. Today this iceberg is melting with star- tling speed. As Saramaka social and eco- nomic life is transformed, especially in relations with the world beyond tribal boundaries, so too is the meaning and value of First-Time knowledge. As Captain G6me said, "The hour is already late." The interest of middle-aged and younger men turns to different rewards, in some ways more easily achieved; at the same time, spurious information floods the system of knowledge. It is certain that the Saramaka world in which I had the privilege to work will never be the same (and not only because of the consequences of my own considered intervention which, in this broader context, must seem rather inconsequential); tour- ists, missionaries, government officials, and visiting scholars are all actively if un- knowingly contributing to major revisions of First-Time knowledge. The vocation of the Saramaka historian such as Tebini or G6me, who spends years of his life trying to piece together a vision of "what really hap- pened," is fast giving way to simple answers picked up from prestigious outsiders. In the process, the ideological core of First-Time is being vitiated. In the new world that younger men are making for themselves, knowledge of how to run a lathe or a tractor becomes more relevant than details of land tenure or esoteric songs. What was once a gradual loss of knowledge by means of a gentle reshaping of past experience to fit new social ends-an integral and normal part of an ongoing system-has now be- come a runaway process that may well point ultimately toward wholesale disappearance. Tebini and other men of knowledge are bitterly aware of what modernization threat- ens to do to their own oral traditions. Some years ago, shortly before his death, the tribal chief's older "brother" Kositan addressed a large political gathering. Among his words, as remembered today, was a poignant im- age of the disappearance of First-Time knowledge. "The canoe of knowledge [sabib6to] of the Matjau clan .... As it was about to 'go' forever, I caught a glimpse of it just as it passed that tree there [he indicated a tree downstream from the landing place]. Not a single other person still here [alive] even saw its wake. Only me." I often think of how much later it was when I caught my own glimpse of that canoe, which was even farther downstream, and ever increasing its rush toward the open sea. [E 48/CArBBEAN CVIEW Anansi... Continued from page 27 is why Adorno suggests that "all 'pure cul- ture' has always been a source of discom- fort to the spokesmen of power." Calypso and reggae compositions that speak too clearly to the issues of the day are banned on radio stations. Scorpion, an Antiguan calypsonian, sang a song, "Is Joke Dey Making," satirically criticizing the government of Antigua. By the beginning of the carnival for which the song was created, it had been banned from being played on the radio station. Similarly, Bob Marley's song, "Crazy Baldhead," was banned from radio stations in Jamaica because it chal- lenged the prevailing ideology. The Antiguan government has taken the suppression of political calypsos one step further than had been hitherto envisioned. A committee appointed by the government to oversee Carnival, announced that for the July 1979 event, any calypsos entered in the calypso competition need be based on two themes: (1) The spirit of Carnival, and (2) love and harmony. Culture was thus being legislated. In a searing attack on the minister of cul- ture for promoting such oppressive rules, one writer refers to him in calypso style as the "Minister of Carnival and Ignorance" and chides him in verse: "You can never / Keep down culture / It will rise in spite of de pressure / So Mr. Carnival Minister; you should know better / And try and be de promoter." The colonized people of the Caribbean have always sought ways to survive psycho- logically under domination. What calypso and folklore demonstrate is some of those survival measures and the part they play in the overall social milieu. Colonized man in Antigua did not rely on his songs and folk tales to give him a "prescription" for sur- vival, but rather developed the songs and folk tales as an expression of his life condi- tion and also the problems of survival in a hostile world. It is in this "expression" of himself and his life condition that we witness the Antiguan's duality of allegiance to two ideologies: the black folk culture and the dominant culture. The two exist-not side by side and apart from each other-but together, for it is from both that the majority of the people in Anti- gua, and by extension, in the Caribbean, draw their sense of self, albeit posing the problematic of conflicting values. Thus it was that the calypso could dem- onstrate admiration for the antihero at the same time that members of the society were striving to achieve the status symbols of the dominant culture. Incidentally, some of those members were themselves the ca- lypsonians and steelbandsmen. But this should come as no real surprise; for calyp- sonians were also demonstrating admira- tion for those who were striving for achievement of the dominant image of a being, at the same time that their calypsos demonstrated admiration for any clever man who broke explicit or implicit laws and escaped punishment. Like Anansi, if you managed to "fool" the law, individuals or the government, and got away with it, you were considered a "smart man." Witness for ex- ample, Sparrow's "Smart Barbadian": '"A Barbadian Engineer by the name of Cephas, / Got to know that Trinidadians were superstitious / So he buy a piece a land up Hololo Mountain / Put concrete 'round a spring and open a fountain / In less than no time, if you hear the shout / Stupid people coming from all about. Chorus: "Trowing coins in the fountain / Each one seeking happiness / Thrown by hopeful lovers, which one will the fountain bless / And from the time they pull out, the Bajan [Barbadian] dive in / Taking all the money from the fountain / And hear him singing, All is mine, all is mine, all is mine.' "I am sure you would be surprised to know / How much big shot does go to Mount Hoollo /All kind of people believe in this thing / If you see how many old maids in search of a ring / Throwin'coins in the fountain like if they feeding fish / Kneeling down on their knees, making a wish / Thousands of people going up there daily / Trinidad was coming like Italy. Chorus: "So many coins in the fountain / Each one longing for a home / There they lie in the fountain, just like in the heart of Rome / And is to see the Barba- Scholarly multidisciplinary journal devoted entirely to Cuba dian with he swimming trunk on / Wait- ing patiently till all the fools gone, to sing all is mine" In addition to the "smart man" we see popular admiration for the "badjohn" char- acter who developed in the 1950s in the Caribbean and is demonstrated in the ca- lypso. The "badjohn" was a male who had transcended the restrictions of the domi- nant hegemony by acting under his own moral code in specific predetermined ways. For example, the "badjohn" did not "take anyone to court." He was his own court, judge, jury and executioner. If an act was committed against him which he deemed to be serious, he would react in any number of ways-all of them violent and against the law. Sometimes the act committed against the "badjohn" seemed merely to be that the wrongdoer had offended the "badjohn" in some slight way. In some instances, the "badjohn" referred to himself as being very "ignorant" and would state that "me no kay wha me do," meaning, that he is above and outside of the explicit and implicit laws that govern the average person's behavior. He was outside of the law because he was igno- rant-not lacking in knowledge but stub- bom and "bullheaded." We hear this theme repeated over and over again in the calypsos from Antigua, Trinidad, Montserrat, and the Virgin Islands. For example, if we examine the work of Lord Short Shirt, Calypso Joe, The Mighty Swallow, Lord Franco, The Mighty Sparrow, Lord Melody, Lord Nelson, The Mighty Ar- row, Lord Obstinate and others, we will find this theme demonstrated consistently. Ca- lypso Joe responded to a threat from "bad- johns" in Antigua in "badjohn" tones with a calypso aptly entitled "Badjohns Beware": Revista academic multidisciplinaria dedicada por entero a Cuba Cuban Studies/Estudios Cubanos is published twice a year by the University of Pittsburgh's Center for Latin American Studies. Each issue includes articles relevant to contemporary themes, with summaries in Spanish and English, plus book reviews, a classified bibliography of recent publications, an inventory of current research, and an author index. Annual Subscriptions: $10-individuals; $20-institutions Back Issues: $5.50-individuals; $10.50-institutions University of Pittsburgh Center for Latin American Studies 4E04 Forbes Quadrangle Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15260 Prepayment requested; please make checks payable to: University of Pittsburgh. CA,?BBEAN P1EVEW/49 CUBANS STUDIES "A lot a man out to beat me /A lot a man out to kill / But a done plan already / For whosoever will. Chorus: "Dey go link ah crazy / Dey go tink ah mad / But when ah move in de city / Ah behavin bad / .... So badjohn beware. "Now why dem boys want to beat me / Friends I really don know / I hear confi- dentially / Is slingers looking for Joe [ Calypso Joel / Just tell dem to tackle / I use neither weed nor rum / I prepare for battle / .... 'Ah notice all of a sudden / It have a lot ofbadjohn in town / But Iain fear dem for nutten / Ah could beat dem wid six cuts down / A drinking one dey calling 'Cat- Puss' / An a next one dey calling 'Chum'/ If at all deyjus miss and touch me / Ah sure ah go out dey lamp." The message is clear: Calypso Joe is as "ignorant" as the "badjohns," hence, "dey go tink ah crazy, dey go tink ah mad," and if they make the mistake of hitting him, even lightly: (If at all deyjus miss and touch me), he will kill them (Ah sure ah go out dey lamp). Expressions of Reality What are we witnessing? Is it some double standard in operation? Are these culture creators typical examples of a split person- ality in the Caribbean? On the contrary, it is not a split personality but a whole one. It is not a contradiction for a people to ascribe to one hegemony at the same time that they develop and make use of a conflicting value system. It is not a contradiction, but a one- ness, with the elements in the society com- bining to produce a whole man, bearing elements of two sets of values, neither of which he finds contradictory. The black folk culture demonstrates that a certain measure of the Anansi personality was needed to survive those elements of the dominant ideology which were oppressive. At the same time, the dominant ideology which controlled the socioeconomic and therefore, daily lives of the people dictated certain realities of life which they recog- nized.There are elements of this recognition demonstrated in an Antiguan calypso, "Ed- ucate the Youths," by Calypso Joe: "What in the world could beat /A sound education / Nothing whatsoever in this modern generation / Now without a good educa- tion upstairs / You will be handicap for donkey years /So to de whole wide world I will say / Educate you little kid from today. Chorus: "You got to tell dem what is wrong / You got to teach dem what is right / An for what is worth achieving they have got to fight / Teach dem to be honest, sincere and wise / An on dey shoulders, de future of de whole world lies / A tree begins from de root / So is you duty to nurture an treat de youth, "Education I know is a all important thing / In this world where morals are deteriorating / Don't allow your son or daughter to follow de crowd / Cultivate a perfect man of whom you'll be proud / Give youth education top priority / That they'll be assets, not disgracing society. "Man de tings dat you teach a child from de time he small / No matter what it be, he won't depart from it at all / So do your little bit to educate de youth / If you want your seeds to bring forth good fruit / .... / Train up you kids parents so that you can hear / In the near future of a Words- worth or a Shakespeare / Instill a good foundation right from de start / So dat when he goes he shall not depart / For every infant that goes astray / There's an adult responsible today." This calypso demonstrates the means by which the black person in the Caribbean sought to achieve elements of the domi- nant image; as one line says, "cultivate a perfect man of whom you'll be proud," and another suggests that to do so is to create a "Wordsworth or Shakespeare." Education was not sought to achieve wisdom and growth, nor even to build a society, but be- cause it was, as Sparrow says, "the key to success." In a calypso entitled "Education" he makes an even stronger case for formal education as the means of achieving all that is good in society: "Education, Education / This is the foundation /Our risingpopula- tion / Needs sound education / To be rec- ognized anywhere you go / You have your certificate to show / To enjoy any kind of happiness / Knowledge is the key to success. Chorus: "Children go to school / And learn well /Otherwise later on in life /You go catch real hell / Without an education in you head / Your whole life will be pure misery / You better off dead / For there is simply no room / In this whole wide world /Foran uneducated little boy or girl / Don allow idle companions / To lead you astray / To earn tomorrow / You got to learn today. "For employment, yes employment / 50/CAR1BBEAN rvIevI You must be intelligent /It's essential, very essential/ To have your credential / But if you're blockheaded / Like a mule / No one will employ a fool / You'll be the last one to be hired / And the first one to be fired. "Illiteracy, illiteracy / Is man's greatest enemy / It's your duty, yes your duty / Stampt it out completely / Ignorance al- ways impedes progress /Education saves you much distress /So learn, learn, learn as much as you can / For the nation's future is in your hand. "It's a treasure, yes a treasure / Beyond any measure /Just secure it, just secure it /Don't ever ignore it / To fight life's battles, come what may / Education, lights up your way / Without it you'll never get through / Success or failure now is up to you." What these calypsos demonstrate is that domination makes those in a subordinate position realists who understand all of the ramifications of their world. It would have been unrealistic, then, for the colonized man in the Caribbean to believe that by being a "badjohn" he would transcend the pressures of his society. The use of force in the society would have also served to con- vince him that he could not engage in such a tactic for long. At the same time, the "bad- john" brings the calypsonian much more support and applause than that given when he sings a calypso in support of the domi- nant ideological image. We would posit then that the development of the "badjohn" is a demonstration of the response of the colonized man in the Caribbean to his dom- ination; the Anansi character is a demon- stration of such a response. The social pressures on the colonized people of the Caribbean were such that the "badjohn" image became legendary; the "badjohn" was the antihero that Bonnie and Clyde were to the harried Americans of their era. Caribbean man could perhaps see in the "badjohn" a man who acted freely--an autonomous, independent being-the "ontologically secure" being of whom R.D. Laing frequently spoke. The "badjohn" demonstrated a certain measure of the Hegelian search for free- dom, autonomy, and independence-a willingness to sacrifice life for an ideal. "Badjohns" were violent, not because they were "ignorant," but because violence had been perpetrated against them by the con- trolling forces in the society, and they could respond only in this manner. The "bad- johns" ideal was not the ideal of the prevail- ing ideology, but that of his own creation, used in his own combat against his per- ceived enemy. Seen as the Caribbean antihero, the "badjohn" demonstrated the need in the society for man to free himself, to differenti- ate himself from objects in the natural world. The "badjohn" was heroic because he moved freely, unfettered by the confines of the dominant hegemony, to make of himself a person rather than existing as an object. The "whitening" process, the angli- cization, the education, the marrying "light" [putting "milk" in you coffee], had all served to make Caribbean man an object. His re- ification was not complete, however, for if he could see something of value in the "bad- john," it must be seen as a demonstration of at least a measure of reaction against his reification. As Jean-Paul Sartre suggests, when one attempts to reshape oneself-using the Other as the yardstick-one becomes an object. When Caribbean man engaged in reshaping himself to fit the dominant model of the society, he did so at the loss of a part of his selfhood, and it is his reaction against this that we see demonstrated in his culture, which is a mirror of his self-his being. His culture is not the reaction, but in his culture, we see a demonstration of his reaction. The folk tales, proverbs or sayings, the reggae and the calypso are not used as "prescriptions" for survival, but are rather, expressions of the life condition of the black folk of the Caribbean. D SALLY PRICE Co-wives and Calabashes Cowives and Calabashes is a book about women's lives in one polygamous society. The society is that of the Saramaka Maroons of Suriname. It is a society that anthropologist Sally Price knows well. She has studied the Saramaka for over fifteen years, and spent three years living in the interior of Suriname where she not only observed the traditional role of women, but lived it herself. Out of that experience comes this book about the roles and expectations of Saramaka women ... about their relationships with men and with one another... and about the artistic expression of those roles and relationships. Cloth $24.00/paper $12.50 The University of Michigan Press Dept DV P.O. Box 1104 Ann Arbor, Michigan 48106 CA ,BBEAN frEViw/51 NIEUWE WEST-INDISCHE GIDS NEW WEST INDIAN GUIDE Edited by H. Hoetink (Man. Ed.), Richard Price, Sally Price b,:: Reviews), H.U.E. Thoden van Velzen, P Wagenaar Hummelinck, L.J. Westermann-van der Steen. Now an exclusively English-language journal, the NWIG continues its long tradition of quality scholarship on Caribbean issues. Its interdisciplinary scope encompasses anthropology, history, linguistics, political science, geography, sociology, literary criticism, music and art, and much more. Contributions cover topics from j:,i i I,:, me t.'iriiii: ,rnd from Haiti to Honduras. Volume 58 (1984) includes coritatiiinris by, among others, Derek Bicker- ton, Bridget Brereton, Stanley Engerman, Neville Hall, lan Hancock, Jerome Handler, Sidney Mintz, Ransford Palmer, and Michel-Rolph Trouillot. And the greatly expanded Book Review section, intended to cover all significant publications on the Caribbean in the social sciences and the humanities, includes reviews of Gordon Lewis' Main Currents in Caribbean Thought, Eric Wolf's Europe and the People without History, Marilyn Silverman's Rich People and Rice, Louis Perez' Cuba between Empires, Bonham Richardson's Caribbean Migrants, Roger Abrahams' The Man-of- Words in the West Indies, Mary Turner's Slaves and Missionaries, Ellen Woolford and William Washabaugh's The Social Context of Creolization, and many others. The "new" NWIG is a must for any committed Caribbeanist. A year's subscription costs only $15; checks, made out to "Treasurer, NWIG," should be sent to: Biltseweg 17, 3735 MA Bosch en Duin, Netherlands. (For payment in Dutch guilders, send f.35 to acct. no. 37.52.44.239, RABO-bank, Zeist). Published continuously since 1919 Recent Books An informative listing of books about the Caribbean, Latin America, and their emigrant groups By Marian Goslinga Anthropology and Sociology ANTILLIANEN IN NEDERLAND: AANPASSING OF BEHOUD VAN EIGEN CULTUUR? W Koot, ed. Stichting Kibra Hacha (Utrecht, Netherlands), 1983. Nf 4.50. About the cultural assimilation of Antillean migrants in the Netherlands. THE BARBADOS-AMERICAN CONNECTION: THE STORY OF A MINI-COUNTRY AND A GIANT May Lumsden. Layne (Nova Scotia, Canada), 1982. 65 p. $6.00. A BORDERLANDS TOWN IN TRANSITION: LAREDO, 1755-1870. Gilberto M. Hinojosa. Texas A & M University Press, 1983. 144 p. $10.95. CANEK: HISTORY AND LEGEND OF A MAYA HERO. Emilio A. G6mez. Avon Books, 1983. 80 p. $2.50. CLASS AND SOCIETY IN CENTRAL CHIAPAS. Robert F. Wasserstrom. University of California Press, 1983. 344 p. $27.50. ENTIRE MEXICO Y ESTADOS UNIDOS: LOS INDOCUMENTADOS. M6nica Verea. Ediciones El Caballito (Mexico), 1982. 189 p. HYPERTENSION AND CULTURE CHANGE: ACCULTURATION AND DISEASE IN THE WEST INDIES. William W Dressier. Redgrave (South Salem, N.Y.), 1982. 158 p. $11.50. THE IDOLS OF DEATH AND THE GOD OF LIFE: A THEOLOGY. Pablo Richard, et al. Barbara E. Campbell, Bonnie Shephard, trans. Orbis Books, 1983. 256 p. $12.95. Essays on liberation theology with references to idolatry in Latin America, originally published under title: La lucha de los dioses. LA INMIGRACION EUROPEA EN LA ARGENTINA. Alberto Kleiner, ed. Libreros y Editores del Poligono (Buenos Aires, Argentina), 1983. 10 vols. THE JIVARO: PEOPLE OF THE SACRED WATERFALLS. Michael J. Harner. University of California Press, 1983. 239 p. $30.00; $7.95 paper. Reprint of the 1972 ed. MINISTERS OF GOD, MINISTERS OF THE PEOPLE: TESTIMONIES OF FAITH FROM NICARAGUA. Teofilo Cabestrero. Orbis Books, 1983. 160 p. $6.95. Interviews with Ernesto Cardenal, Minister of Culture, Fernando Cardenal, Youth Movement Coordinator, and Miguel d'Escoto, Foreign Minister, of Nicaragua. All three are priests. THE NEGRO IN BRAZIL. Arthur Ramos. Porcupine Press, 1983. 203 p. $17.50. Reprint of the 1939 ed. NO ME AGARRAN VIVA: LA MUJER SALVADORENA EN LA LUCHA. Claribel Alegria, D. J. Flakoll. Ediciones Era (Mexico), 1983. 146 p. OBEAH, CHRIST AND RASTAMAN: JAMAICA AND ITS RELIGION. Ivor Morrish. J. Clarke (Cambridge, Eng.), 1982. 122 p. POLONESES EM SANTA CATARINA: A COLONIZACAO DO ALTO VALE DO RIO TIJUCAS. Maria Theresinha Sobierajski Barreto. Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (Florian6polis, Brazil), 1983. 143 p. EL PRESIDIO POLITICO EN CUBA COMUNISTA: TESTIMONIO. ICOSOCV Ediciones (Caracas, Venezuela), 1982. 511 p. $20.00. RITUAL HUMOR IN HIGHLAND CHIAPAS. Victoria R. Bricker. 2d ed. University of Texas Press, 1983. 277 p. $8.95. THE SOCIAL AND POLITICAL THOUGHT OF THE COLONIAL INTELLIGENTSIA. John G. La Guerre. Institute of Social and Economic Research (University of the West Indies), 1982. 136 p. $12.00. TRIALS AND TRIUMPHS: THE LONG ROAD TO A MIDDLE CLASS SOCIETY IN THE U.S. VIRGIN ISLANDS. Earle B. Ottley. Ottley (St. Thomas, VI.), 1982. 438 p. $27.95. LA VIDA EN QUERETARO DURANTE LA COLONIA, 1531-1810. John C. Super. Mercedes Pizarro Romero, trans. Fondo de Cultura Econ6mica (Mexico), 1983. 294 p. Translation of Queretaro: society and economy in early provincial Mexico, 1590-1630. Biography CARLOS CHAVEZ: MEXICO'S MODERN-DAY ORPHEUS. Robert Parker. Twayne, 1983. 166 p. $21.95. Biography of the Mexican composer. EL DICTADOR. Fernando Fernandez. Corregidor (Buenos Aires, Argentina), 1983. 385 p. About Argentina's Juan Manuel Rosas. FRIDA KAHLO: UNA VIDA ABIERTA. Raquel Tibol. Editorial Oasis (Mexico), 1983.152 p. RENATO BELUCHE: SMUGGLER, PRIVATEER AND PATRIOT, 1780-1860. Jane Lucas de Grummond. Louisiana State University Press, 1983. 300 p. $27.50. Biography of Bolivar's favorite admiral. SANTA ANNA, EL DICTADOR RESPLANDECIENTE. Rafael Felipe Muifoz. Fondo de Cultura Econ6mica (Mexico), 1983. 277 p. Reprint of the 1945 ed. WALTER RODNEY, REVOLUTIONARY AND SCHOLAR: A TRIBUTE. Edward A. Alpers, Pierre-Michel Fontaine, eds. Center for Afro- American Studies, University of California, 1983. 187 p. $17.95. Biography of the Guyanese scholar and revolutionary assassinated in 1980. Description and Travel CABO SAN LUCAS. Susan H. Crow. Graphic Image Publications, 1983. 100 p. $4.95. jGRACIASI A LATIN AMERICAN JOURNAL. Henri J. M. Nouwen. Harper & Row, 1983. 188 p. $12.95. Journal of a Dutch priest traveling through Peru and Bolivia. 52/CAI?BBEAN rKEieW THE PELICAN GUIDE TO THE BAHAMAS. James E. Moore. Pelican, 1983. 320 p. $9.95. THE TRAVEL GUIDE TO PUERTO RICO, 1982-1983. Connie Garcia, Arthur Medina. Puerto Rico Almanacs, 1983. 340 p. $9.95. VIAJE A LA NUEVA ESPANA. Giovanni Francesco Gemelli Cabreri; Jose M. Agreda y Sanchez, trans. Universidad Aut6noma de Mexico, 1983. 214 p. Reprint of the 1955 ed. which was a translation of that part of the author's Giro del Mondo, which relates to New Spain. JESUIT RANCHES AND THE AGRARIAN DEVELOPMENT OF COLONIAL ARGENTINA, 1650-1767. Nicholas P Cushner. State University of New York Press, 1983. 206 p. $44.50; $14.50 paper. LATIN AMERICA IN THE WORLD ECONOMY: NEW PERSPECTIVES. Diana Tussle, ed. St. Martin's Press, 1983. 213 p. $25.00. THE NATIONALIZATION OF THE VENEZUELAN OIL INDUSTRY: FROM TECHNOCRATIC SUCCESS TO POLITICAL FAILURE. Gustavo Coronel. Lexington Books, 1983. Economics BOLIVIA: IMPERIALISMO Y OLIGARQUIA. J. M. de la Cueva. Ediciones Roalva (La Paz, Bolivia), 1983. 370 p. BRAZIL AND MEXICO: PATTERNS IN LATE DEVELOPMENT Sylvia Ann Hewlett, Richard S. Weinert, eds. Institute for the Study of Human Issues, 1983. 350 p. $30.00. LA QUESTION AGRARIA, 1933-1971. Carlos Lleras Restrepo. Osprey (Bogota, Colombia), 1983. 375 p. Colombia's former president writes about his country's agrarian problems. DISENGAGEMENT PAYSAN ET SOUS- PRODUCTION ALIMENTAIRE: MARTINIQUE, MARIE-GALANTE, BARBADE. Romain Paquette. Presses de I'Universite de Montreal, 1982. 214 p. $16.95. DEVELOPMENT AND CRISIS IN BRAZIL, 1930-1982. Luiz Carlos Bresser Pereira; Marcia Van Dyke, Nancy Voigt, trans. Westview Press, 1983. 325 p. $25.00. Translation of Desenvolvimiento e crise no Brasil. AN ECONOMIC HISTORY OF THE BAHAMAS. Anthony Thompson. Commonwealth Publications (Nassau, Bahamas), 1982. 292 p. EL SALVADOR AND ECONOMIC INTEGRATION IN CENTRAL AMERICA: AN ECONOMIC STUDY Gabriel Siri. Lexington Books, 1983. ESTADO LIBERAL Y DESARROLLO CAPITALIST EN HONDURAS. Guillermo Molina Chocano. 2d ed. Universidad Nacional Aut6noma de Honduras, 1982. 136 p. INDUSTRIALIZATION AND REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT IN COLOMBIA. Menno Vellinga, Dirk Kruijt. Centro de Estudios y Documentaci6n Latinoamericanos, CEDLA (Amsterdam, Netherlands), 1983. 185 p. Dfl.25.00. IRRIGATION HORTICULTURE IN HIGHLAND GUATEMALA: THE TABLON SYSTEM OF PANAJACHEL. Kent Mathewson. Westview Press, 1983. 185 p. $19.00. PERIPHERAL CAPITALISM: THE TRANSFORMATION OF ANTIGUA IN POSTCOLONIAL CARIBBEAN SOCIETY. Paget Henry. Transaction Books, 1983. 297 p. $34.95. THE REDIVISION OF LABOR: WOMEN AND ECONOMIC CHOICE IN FOUR GUATEMALAN COMMUNITIES. Laurel H. Bossen. State University of New York Press, 1983. 368 p. $46.50; $16.95 paper. RESIDENTIAL SUBDIVISIONS OF BARBADOS, 1965-1977. Lionel L. Nurse. Institute of Social and Economic Research, University of the West Indies (Cave Hill, Barbados), 1983. 119 p. REVOLUTIONARY CUBA: ECONOMIC GROWTH, INCOME DISTRIBUTION, AND BASIC NEEDS. Claes Brundenius. Westview Press, 1983. 160 p. $30.00. U.S.-MEXICO RELATIONS: ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL ASPECTS. Clark W. Reynolds, Carlos Tello, eds. Rev. ed. Stanford University Press, 1983. 375 p. $25.00. History and Archaeology AMERICA Y LA ESPANA DEL SIGLO XVI: HOMENAJE A GONZALO FERNANDEZ DE OVIEDO, CRONISTA DE LAS INDIAS, EN EL V CENTENARIO DE SU NACIMIENTO. Francisco de Solano, Fermin del Pino. Institute Gonzalo Fernandez de Oviedo (Madrid, Spain), 1982. 431 p. 1.000 ptas. THE ANCIENT MAYA. Sylvanus G. Morley, George W. Brainerd. 4th rev. ed. Stanford University Press, 1983. 728 p. $28.50. ARCHAEOLOGY AND VOLCANISM IN CENTRAL AMERICA: THE ZAPOTITAN VALLEY OF EL SALVADOR. Payson D. Sheets. University of Texas Press, 1983. 320 p. $35.00. BUENOS AIRES: HISTORIC DE CUATRO SIGLOS. Jose Luis Romero, Luis Alberto Romero. Abril (Buenos Aires, Argentina), 1983. 2 vols. CABEZA DE VACAS ADVENTURES IN THE UNKNOWN INTERIOR OF AMERICA. Cyclone Covey, ed. and trans. University of New Mexico Press, 1983. 160 p. $4.95. Translation of La relaci6n y comentarios del governador Alvar Nufiez Cabe:a de Vaca de lo acaescido en las dos jornadas que hizo a las Indias. THE CHURCH IN BARBADOS IN THE SEVENTEENTH CENTURY. R F. Campbell. Barbados Museum and Historical Society, 1982. 188 p. DAUGHTERS OF THE CONQUISTADORES: WOMEN OF THE VICEROYALTY OF PERU. Luis Martin. University of New Mexico Press, 1983. 416 p. $29.95; $14.95 paper. DE BELLO CONTRA INSULANOS: INTERVENTION DE ESPANIA EN AMERICA. Juan de la Pefia. Escuela Espafiola de la Paz (Madrid, Spain), 1982. 547 p. 1.600 ptas. EXCAVATIONS IN SMALL RESIDENTIAL GROUPS OF TIKAL: GROUP 4F-1 AND 4F-2. William A. Haviland. University Museum, University of Pennsylvania, 1983. FRAGMENTS OF THE MEXICAN REVOLUTION: PERSONAL ACCOUNTS FROM THE BORDER. Oscar J. Martinez, ed. University of New Mexico Press, 1983. 256 p. $24.95. HACIA UNA HISTORIC DEL AMBIENTE EN AMERICA LATINA: DE LAS CULTURES ABORIGENES A LA CRISIS ECOLOGICAL ACTUAL. Luis Vitale. Editorial Nueva Imagen (Mexico), 1983. 121 p. THE HISTORY OF THE ISLAND OF TRINIDAD UNDER THE SPANISH GOVERNMENT Pierre Gustave Louis Borde; James Alva Bain, A. S. Mavrogordato, trans. Paria Publishing Co. (Port-of-Spain, Trinidad), 1982. 2 vols. Translation of Histoire de I'le de la Trinidad sous le gouvernement espagnol; this is a reprint of the 1932 ed. HISTORY OF THE PUERTO RICAN INDEPENDENCE MOVEMENT: 20th CENTURY Harold J. Lidin. Waterfront Press (Maplewood, New Jersey), 1983. 250 p. $18.95; $10.00 paper. HISTORY WILL ABSOLVE ME. Fidel Castro. Lyle Stuart (Secaucus, N.J.), 1983. 128 p. $3.95. Reprint of the Moncada trial defense speech. CATIBBEAN PEVIEW/53 LIBROS DE ASIENTOS DE LA GOBERNACION DE LA NUEVA ESPANA: PERIOD DEL VIRREY DON LUIS DE VELASCO, 1550-1552. Silvio Zavala. Archivo General de la Naci6n (Mexico), 1982. 510 p. MALDITO PAIS. Jose Roman. Ediciones El Pez y la Serpiente (Managua, Nicaragua), 1983. 203 p. A history of Nicaragua by Sandino's personal secretary. MAYA RUINS IN CENTRAL AMERICA IN COLOR. William M. Ferguson, John Q. Royce. University of New Mexico Press, 1983. 320 p. $35.00. MISIONES MEXICANAS DE LA COMPANIA DE JESUS 1618-1745: CARTAS E INFORMES CONSERVADOS EN LA "COLECCION MATEU". Ernest J. Burrus, Felix Zubillaga, eds. Porria Turanzas (Madrid, Spain), 1982. 349 p. THE NICARAGUA READER: DOCUMENTS OF A REVOLUTION UNDER FIRE. John Vandermeer, Peter Rosset, eds. Grove Press, 1983. 368 p. $22.50; $7.95 paper. OVERZEE: NEDERLANDSE KOLONIALE GESCHIEDENIS, 1590-1975. E. van den Boogaart, et al. Fibula-Van Dishoeck (Haarlem, Netherlands), 1983. 291 p. Nf44.50. Essays on Dutch colonial history. PREHISTORIC SETTLEMENT PATTERNS: ESSAYS IN HONOR OF GORDON R. WILLEY. Evon Z. Vogt, Richard M. Leventhal, eds. University of New Mexico Press, 1983. 512 p. $37.50. SPAIN AND THE LOSS OF AMERICA. Timothy E. Anna. University of Nebraska Press, 1983. 343 p. $26.50. SPANIARDS AND INDIANS IN SOUTHEASTERN MESOAMERICA: ESSAYS ON THE HISTORY OF ETHNIC RELATIONS. Murdo J. MacLeod, Robert Wasserstrom, eds. University of Nebraska Press, 1983. 350 p. $22.95. TESTIMONIO DE UNA AMISTAD: FRANCISCO DE PAULA SANTANDER Y JOAQUIN MOSQUERA. Jose Maria de Mier, ed. Plaza & Janes (Bogota, Colombia), 1983. 486 p. TOURISM IN THE CARIBBEAN: THE ECONOMIC IMPACT Shirley B. Seward, Bernard K. Spinrad, eds. International Development Research Centre (Ottawa, Canada), 1982. 163 p. TRADE AND EXCHANGE IN EARLY MESOAMERICA. Kenneth G. Hirth, ed. University of New Mexico Press, 1983. 336 p. $37.50. TULA: THE TOLTEC CAPITAL OF ANCIENT MEXICO. Richard A. Diehl. Thames & Hudson, 1983. $29.95. THE VIEW FROM THE TOP OF THE TEMPLE: ANCIENT MAYA CIVILIZATION AND MODERN MAYA CULTURE. Kenneth Pearce. University of New Mexico Press, 1983. 304 p. $24.95; $12.95 paper. Language and Literature AFRO-HISPANIC POETRY, 1940-1980: FROM SLAVERY TO 'NEGRITUD' IN SOUTH AMERICAN VERSE. Marvin A. Lewis. University of Missouri Press, 1983. 208 p. $22.00. APALABRAMIENTO: DIEZ CUENTISTAS PUERTORRIQUENOS DE HOY Efrain Barradas, ed. Ediciones del Norte (Hanover, N.H.), 1983. 250 p. $9.00. AT 8:25 EVITA BECAME IMMORTAL. Mario Szichman; Roberto Picciotto, trans. Ediciones del Norte (Hanover, N.H.), 1983. 288 p. $7.50. Translation of A las 20:25 la Sefiora entr6 en la inmortalidad, a novel about Argentina. AZTEC PLACE NAMES: THEIR MEANING AND MODE OF COMPOSITION. Frederick Starr. Ivrington, 1983. $24.50. Reprint of the 1920 ed. JUAN JOSE ARREOLA. Yulan M. Washburn. G. K. Hall, 1983. 168 p. $16.95. JUAN RULFO. Luis Leal. G. K. Hall, 1983. 151 p. $17.50. THE LATIN AMERICAN SHORT STORY: A CRITICAL HISTORY. Margaret Sayers Peden, ed. G. K. Hall, 1983. $17.95. MYTH AND IDEOLOGY IN CONTEMPORARY BRAZILIAN FICTION. Daphne Patai. Fairleigh Dickinson University Press, 1983. 256 p. $29.50. LA NOVELA CHICANA ESCRITA EN ESPANOL CINCO AUTORES COMPROMETIDOS. Salvador Rodriguez del Pino. Bilingual Press (Ypsilanti, Mich.), 1982. 159 p. $7.95. PANORAMA DE LA LITERATURE NICARAGUENSE. Jorge Eduardo Arellano. Nueva Nicaragua (Managua, Nicaragua), 1982. 197 p. THE POETIC FICTION OF JOSE LEZAMA LIMA. Raymond D. Souza. University of Missouri Press, 1983. RUBEN DARIO AND THE ROMANTIC SEARCH FOR UNITY: THE MODERNIST RECOURSE TO ESOTERIC TRADITION. Cathy L. Jrade. University of Texas Press, 1983. 192 p. $19.95. STUDIES ON TWENTIETH-CENTURY SPANISH AND SPANISH AMERICAN LITERATURE. Kessel Schwartz. University Press of America, 1983. 401 p. $28.50; $16.25 paper. DAS WERK ALEJO CARPENTERS: CHRONIK DER 'WUNDERBAREN WIRKLICHKEIT'. Claudius Armbruster. Vervuert (Frankfurt, Germany), 1982. 338 p. DM25.00. Politics and Government ARGENTINA UNDER PERON, 1973-76: THE NATION'S EXPERIENCE WITH A LABOUR-BASED GOVERNMENT Guido Di Tella. St. Martin's Press, 1983. 246 p. $25.00. CIVIL LIBERTIES IN THE U.S. VIRGIN ISLANDS, 1917-1949. William W. Boyer. Antilles Graphics (St. Croix, VI.), 1982. 184 p. $11.95. CONTROLLING LATIN AMERICAN CONFLICTS: TEN APPROACHES. Michael A. Morris, Victor Millan, eds. Westview Press, 1983. 272 p. $22.50. CUBAN COMMUNISM. Irving Louis Horowitz, ed. 5th ed. Transaction Books, 1983. 688 p. $19.95. LA DERROTA DIPLOMATIC Y MILITARY DE LA REPUBLICAN ARGENTINA EN LA GUERRA DE LAS ISLAS MALVINAS. Oscar Luis Viola. Tinta Nueva (Buenos Aires, Argentina), 1983. 251 p. LOS DESEOS IMAGINARIOS DEL PERONISMO. Juan Jose Sebreli. Legasa (Buenos Aires, Argentina), 1983. 213 p. EL SALVADOR: AMERICA'S NEXT VIETNAM? Steffen W. Schmidt. Documentary Publications (Salisbury, N.C.), 1983. 217 p. $19.95. THE FALKLANDS/MALVINAS CONFLICT: A SPUR TO ARMS BUILD-UPS. Jozef Goldblat, Victor Millan. Stockholm International Peace Research Institute (SIPRI), 1983. FOREIGN POLICY ON LATIN AMERICA, 1970-1980. Charles William Maynes, et al. Westview Press, 1983. 175 p. $20.00; $9.95 paper. Edited by the staff of Foreign Policy. FORWARD EVER THREE YEARS OF GRENADIAN REVOLUTION. SPEECHES OF MAURICE BISHOP Maurice Bishop. Pathfinder Press (Sydney, Australia), 1982. 288 p. $23.00; $6.95 paper. 54/CA ?BBEAN REVIEW THE FUTURE OF CENTRAL AMERICA. POLICY CHOICES FOR THE U.S. AND MEXICO. Richard N. Fagen, Olga Pellicer, eds. Stanford University Press, 1983. 228 p. $20.00; $11.95 paper. THE GIANT'S RIVAL: THE USSR AND LATIN AMERICA. Cole Blasier. University of Pittsburgh Press, 1983. 176 p. $14.95; $7.95 paper. GRAN BRETANA, ESTADOS UNIDOS Y LA DECLINACION ARGENTINA, 1942-1949. Carlos Escud&. Editorial de Belgrano (Buenos Aires, Argentina), 1983. 397 p. LOS GUERRILLEROS VENCEN A LOS GENERALS: HOMENAJE A CARLOS FONSECA AMADOR. Guillermo Rothschuh Tablada. 3d rev. ed. Ediciones Distribuidora Cultural (Managua, Nicaragua), 1983. 132 p. GUYANA, A NATION IN RUINS: THE PUERTO RICAN MODEL FAILED. Paul Nehru Tennassee. Guyanese Research and Representation Services (Toronto, Canada), 1982. 101 p. JOSE LOPEZ PORTILLO Y YO: HISTORIC DE UNA INFAMIA POLITICAL. Oscar Flores Tapia. Editorial Grijalbo (Mexico), 1983. 165 p. LENGTHENING SHADOWS: BIRTH AND REVOLT OF THE TRINIDAD ARMY. S. Hylton Edwards. Imprint Caribbean (Trinidad and Tobago), 1982. 154 p. THE LONG WAR: DICTATORSHIP AND REVOLUTION IN EL SALVADOR. James Dunkerley. Schocken Books, 1983. 264 p. $10.95. LAS MALVINAS: TRAICION 'MADE IN USA'. Elisabeth Reiman. Ediciones El Caballito (Mexico), 1983. 142 p. MAURICE BISHOP SPEAKS: THE GRENADA REVOLUTION 1979-1983. Pathfinder Press (New York), 1983. 400 p. $6.95.28 speeches and interviews of Maurice Bishop, plus reprints of additional speeches and material from Granma about the events of October 1983. MOVEMENT OF THE PEOPLE: ESSAYS ON INDEPENDENCE. Selwyn R. Cudjoe. Calaloux Publications (Ithaca, N.Y.), 1983. 217 p. About social and political changes on Trinidad and Tobago. ORIGENES DEL AUTORITARISMO EN AMERICA LATINA. Leopoldo Allub. Editorial Katun (Mexico), 1983. 268 p. PARTICIPATION IN LATIN AMERICA. Agustin Cordillo. Vantage Press, 1983. $7.95. POLITICAL CHANGE IN CENTRAL AMERICA. INTERNAL AND EXTERNAL DIMENSIONS. Wolf Grabendorff, Heinrich- W. Krumwiede, Jeorg Todt. Westview Press, 1983. 175 p. $16.50. THE POLITICAL OPINIONS OF THE JAMAICAN PEOPLE, 1976-81. Carl Stone. Blackett Publishers (Kingston, Jamaica), 1982. 78 p. Results of a comprehensive poll. POLITICS IN A PATRIMONIAL SOCIETY. Riordan Roett. 3d ed. Prager, 1983. 272 p. $24.95; $12.95 paper. THE POPULIST CHALLENGE: ARGENTINE ELECTORAL BEHAVIOR IN THE POSTWAR ERA. Lars Schoultz. University of North Carolina Press, 1983. 160 p. $9.95. RELACION Y DOCUMENTS DE GOBIERNO DEL VIRREY DEL PERU, AGUSTIN DE JAUREGUI Y ALDECOA, 1780-1784. Remedios Contreras, ed. Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Cientificas (Madrid, Spain), 1982. 312 p. 900 pts. REVOLUTION AND INTERVENTION IN CENTRAL AMERICA. Marlene Dixon, Susanne Jonas, eds. 2nd rev. ed. Synthesis Publications (San Francisco, Calif.), 1983. 200 p. $8.95. ROADS TO REASON: TRANSPORTATION, ADMINISTRATION, AND RATIONALITY IN COLOMBIA. Richard E. Hartwig. University of Pittsburgh Press, 1983. 288 p. $24.95. SHOULD THE UNITED STATES BE PROHIBITED FROM MILITARY INTERVENTION IN THE WESTERN HEMISPHERE? Congressional Research Service, Library of Congress. U.S. Govt., Printing Office, 1982. 367 p. THE SOUTHERN CONE: REALITIES OF THE AUTHORITARIAN STATE. Cesar Caviedes. Rowman and Allanheld (Totowa, N.J.), 1983. 170 p. $26.95. 200 YEARS OF GRINGOS. Carlos A. Montaner; Gast6n Fernandez de la Toriente, James E Horton, trans. University Press of America, 1983. $17.25; $7.75 paper. Translation of 200 aFios de gringos, a treatise on the foreign relations between Latin America and the U.S. U.S.-PANAMA RELATIONS, 1903-1978: A STUDY IN LINKAGE POLITICS. David N. Farnsworth, James W. McKennet, eds. Westview Press, 1983. 314 p. $23.00. THE VENEZUELA-GUYANA BORDER DISPUTE: BRITAIN'S COLONIAL LEGACY IN LATIN AMERICA. Jacqueline A. Braveboy-Wagner. Westview Press, 1983. 200 p. $20.00. Reference AN ANNOTATED CATALOGUE OF MEDICAL AMERICANA IN THE LIBRARY OF THE WELLCOME INSTITUTE FOR THE HISTORY OF MEDICINE: BOOKS AND PRINTED CATALOGUES 1557-1821 FROM LATIN AMERICA AND THE CARIBBEAN ISLANDS, AND MANUSCRIPTS FROM THE AMERICAS 1575-1927. Robin Price. Wellcome Institute for the History of Medicine (London, Eng.), 1983. 303 p. $35.00. BLACK CHRONOLOGY FROM 4000 B.C. TO THE ABOLITION OF THE SLAVE TRADE. Ellen Irene Diggs. G. K. Hall, 1983. 312 p. Includes many references to the Caribbean and South America. CATALOG DE LA COLECCION DE LA LITERATURE CHILENA EN LA BIBLIOTECA COLON. General Secretariat, Organization of American States. OAS, 1983. 154 p. $15.00. CHICANO PERIODICAL INDEX: A CUMULATIVE INDEX TO SELECTED PERIODICALS, 1979-1981. Francisco Garcia-Ayvens, Richard Chabran, eds. G.K. Hall, 1983. 648 p. $135.00. DICIONARIO DO BRASIL CENTRAL. Bernardo Elis, et al. Atica (Sao Paulo, Brazil), 1983. 472 p. $14.00. ENCYCLOPEDIA ARGENTINA SOBRE PATAGONIA, ISLAS DEL ATLANTICO SUR Y CONTINENT ANTARTICO. Alberto Kleiner, ed. Poligono (Buenos Aires, Argentina), 1983. 5 vols. GUIDE TO THE NOTARIAL RECORDS OF THE ARCHIVO GENERAL DE NOTARIAS, MEXICO CITY, FOR THE YEAR 1847. Robert A. Potash, Jan Bazant, Josefina Z. Vazquez. University of Massachusetts, 1983. 237 p. $20.00. INDEX TO SPANISH AMERICAN COLLECTIVE BIOGRAPHY: VOLUME 2, MEXICO. Sara de Mundo Lo. G.K. Hall, 1983. $65.00. THE NEW LATIN AMERICAN CINEMA: AN ANNOTATED BIBLIOGRAPHY Julianne Burton. Smyrna Press (Brooklyn, N.Y), 1983. $4.00. NICARAGUA. Ralph Lee Woodward, Jr., comp. ABC-Clio (Santa Barbara, California), 1983. 260 p. $21.75. A volume in the World Bibliographical series. Marian Goslinga is the Latin American and Caribbean Librarian at Florida International University CAhRBBEAN PTVIEW/55 CRISIS IN THE CARIBBEAN edited by Fitzroy Ambursley and Robin Cohen The revolutionary overturns which took place in Grenada and Nicaragua in 1979 and their significance for revolutionary struggle in all of Central America as well as for escalating US. aggression place the Caribbean Basin at the very center of world politics. This anthology the first major attempt to integrate the political experiences of the Central American/Caribbean region as a whole, provides analyses of the most critical events of the last four years. Both theoretically and against historical experience, the contributors pose the fundamental questions of what political strategy and institutional forms are necessary to effect a lasting transition to socialism in this explosive region. "One of the best efforts to deal with some of the most important problems of making-and sustaining-revolution in Central America and the Caribbean." -Robert Armstrong, NACLA co-author, El Salvador: The Face of Revolution Paper: $10.00/6-00 PB6313 Cloth: $26.00/15-75 CL6305 COMING SOON The Politics of Intervention: The United States and Central America edited by Roger Burbach and Patricia Flynn Paper: $10.00/6-00 PB6356 Cloth: $25.00/15-15 CL6348 The Rise of the Authoritarian State in Peripheral Societies by Clive Y Thomas Paper: $11.00/6-65 PB6585 Cloth: $2700/16-35 CL6577 Please add $1 50 for the first book. 25r for each additional book, when ordering by mail At your bookstore or directly from Monthly Review Press 155 West 23rd Street, New York, NY 10011 56/CARBBEAN REVIEW Adaptive Responses of Native Amazonians Edited by RAYMOND B. HAMES WILLIAM T. VICKERS A Volume in the STUDIES IN ANTHROPOLOGY Series This volume comprises an introductory re- view followed by fourteen substantive stud- ies of the environmental adaptations and human ecology of the Indians of Amazonia. In all, seventeen indigenous societies in six modern nations are discussed in detail. Each chapter is problem oriented and uses original quantitative data to test specific hypotheses concerning human adaptations to a Neotropical ecosystem. The chapters focus on settlement patterns, nutrition, and the subsistence strategies of hunting, fishing, foraging, and cultivation. The au- thors represent a broad range of theoreti- cal approaches to ecological anthropology: ethnoecology, cultural ecology, cultural materialism, and evolutionary ecology. ApriJ/May 1983, 536 pp., $49.00 ISBN: 0-12-321250-2 Senid pai meant with order and save postage and handling. Prices are in U.S. dollars and are subject to change without notice. ACADEMIC PRESS, INC. A Subsidiary of Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, Publishers New York London Toronto Sydney San Francisco 312 0144 111 FIFTH AVENUE, NEW YORK, N.Y. 10003 Latin American and Caribbean Center Occasional Paper Series OPS 1 de Goes Monteiro, Pedro Aurelio. "The Brazilian Army in 1925: A Contemporary Opinion." OPS 2 Haber, Alicia. "Vernacular Culture in Uruguayan Art: An Analysis of the Work of Pedro Figary, Carlos Gonzalez and Luis Solari." OPS 3 Drekonja Kornat, Gerhard. "Colombia: En busqueda de una political exterior." OPS 4 Geggus, David. "Slave Resistance Studies and the Saint Domingue Slave Revolt: Some Preliminary Considerations." OPS 5 Santamaria, Daniel. "Iglesia y economic campesina en el Alto Peru, siglo XVIII." OPS 6 Pdrez-L6pez, Jorge F. "Central America's External Debt in the 1970s and Prospects for the 1980s." $4.00 each Latin American and Caribbean Center Florida International University Tamiami Trail, Miami, FL 33199 (305) 554-2894 Show your clients how to do the "Mexibbean' START HERE ~* MIAMI I In our never-ending search for new, better, different, exciting (etc., etc., etc.) ways to show your clients how to let themselves go, NCL has created the "Mexibbean'. The "Mexibbean" is that rare combination of new experiences and old favorites. And it's a snap to mas- ter in seven days and nights aboard the M/S Skyward (with just a little encouragement from you and free air fare*). Step I. Miami. Our jumping off place for a week of margaritas, mariachi and all the madcap excitement your clients have come to expect from an NCL cruise: Sizzling revues. Sparkling entertainment. Sensational food. Gambling. Sports. And so much more. Step 2. Cancun. Sand between the toes and plenty of time for shopping or trekking to the Mayan ruins of Chichen Itza. Step 3. Cozumel. Soft-shoeing up to the cliff-tops for the view or snorkeling around Xel-Ha Lagoon. Step 4. Sun-loving, fun-loving Key West. OUT ISLAND COZUMEL Here's where they can follow in Hemingway's famous footsteps and pick up a few moves from the fish. Step 5. Our own Out Island. A whole day of barefoot partying on our uninhabited, uninhibited beaches. And a final fling before waltzing on home. And when your clients come home from the "Mexibbean" they'll go one step fur.he. ." one-r,,-1hre .." ....: excur . optic ,,I l -1. extra NORWEGIAN CARIBBEA LINES America's Favorite Cruise Line T Ships' Registry: Norway / KEY WEST CANCUN : I / 'I I" We^^, a proud t have been chosen^'^^fjiZ^^^^^^^^^^^^ ,.~. ~ ~ .tie |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| MILLISECOND | CLASS.METHOD | MESSAGE |
|---|---|---|
| 0 | sobekcm_page_globals.constructor | |
| 0 | sobekcm_page_globals.constructor | Application State validated or built |
| 0 | sobekcm_database.verify_item_lookup_object | |
| 0 | sobekcm_page_globals.constructor | Navigation Object created from URI query string |
| 0 | sobekcm_database.verify_item_lookup_object | |
| 0 | sobekcm_page_globals.display_item | Retrieving item or group information |
| 0 | sobekcm_page_globals.get_entire_collection_hierarchy | Retrieving hierarchy information |
| 0 | sobekcm_assistant.get_entire_collection_hierarchy | |
| 0 | cached_data_manager.retrieve_item_aggregation | |
| 0 | cached_data_manager.retrieve_item_aggregation | Found item aggregation on local cache |
| 0 | item_aggregation_builder.get_item_aggregation | Found 'all' item aggregation in cache |
| 0 | system.web.ui.page.page_load (ufdc.page_load) | |
| 0 | sobekcm_page_globals.constructor.on_page_load | |
| 0 | html_echo_mainwriter.add_style_references | Adding style references to HTML |
| 0 | html_echo_mainwriter.add_text_to_page | Reading the text from the file and echoing back to the output stream |
| 55 | html_echo_mainwriter.add_text_to_page | Finished reading and writing the file |