Group Title: Historic St. Augustine: East Wing Restoration, Haas House
Title: Bid Tabulation
ALL VOLUMES CITATION MAP IT! THUMBNAILS PAGE IMAGE ZOOMABLE
Full Citation
STANDARD VIEW MARC VIEW
Permanent Link: http://ufdc.ufl.edu/UF00095487/00021
 Material Information
Title: Bid Tabulation
Series Title: Historic St. Augustine: East Wing Restoration, Haas House
Physical Description: Maintenance record
Language: English
Publication Date: 1984
Physical Location:
Box: 8
Divider: Government House Maintenance
Folder: East Wing Restoration, Haas House
 Subjects
Subject: Saint Augustine (Fla.)
48 King Street (Saint Augustine, Fla.)
Government House (Saint Augustine, Fla.)
Spatial Coverage: North America -- United States of America -- Florida -- Saint Johns -- Saint Augustine -- 48 King Street
Coordinates: 29.892465 x -81.313142
 Record Information
Bibliographic ID: UF00095487
Volume ID: VID00021
Source Institution: University of Florida
Holding Location: University of Florida
Rights Management: All rights reserved by the source institution and holding location.

Full Text


HISTORIC ST. AUGUSTINE PRESERVATION BOARD


MEMO RANDUM

July 21, 1982



TO: PLANNING COMMITTEE

FROM: William R. Adams

SUBJECT: East Wing Restoration; Staff Recommendations


At the March meeting the Board discussed a staff proposal to install a
concrete slab floor in the east wing of Government House and decided to
determine the eventual use of the facility before any renovation is undertaken.
The question was referred to the Planning Committee, which asked for staff
comment and possible uses. These include:

A. Exhibit space or hall: the Board presently has no secure or large area
in which it exhibits historical or archaeological artifacts associated
with the history of St. Augustine. It has in storage considerable archaeo-
logical material that has been uncovered in the two decades of research
conducted under its auspices and those of the St. Augustine Restoration
Foundation, Inc. Some is displayed in the Government House window cases,
but that space is limited.

B. Reception Hall: the only space presently available to the Board for a
reception area is the conference room.

C. Archaeological Storage: Within a very short time, serious efforts shall
have to be made to construct or develop an archaeological storage area,
since the only presently available space for that purpose, the Government
House basement, is filled.

D. Office Space: The area could be adoptively restored to create office space
for either internal use or rental.

The least expensive alternative above would undoubtedly be C, since reno-
vation for storage would not require elaborate architectural treatment.

Alternative D is listed as a possibility, but it is not one that the staff
recommends, because: (a) the office space would presently be surplus to the
agency's needs; and (b) commercial rental in this building is not feasible for
a variety of reasons. Additionally, no parking space is available for tenants.

The staff recommendation is as follows:

1. That the east wing be renovated for a combination of purposes A and B.

2. That the Board authorize an expenditure of $8,000 maximum to begin instal-
lation of a concrete slab floor, which would be adaptable to any plan
eventually adopted for the space. Engineering plans for the floor have
been drafted. The space could then immediately be used for storage.







Memorandum to Planning Committee
July 21, 1982
Page 2




3. That the staff prepare specifications for the renovation of the space in
order that the work can be submitted for architectural buds.

Further consideration will have to be given the alternative of (1) an
adaptive renovation or (2) a restoration to the east wing's 1936 appearance.
It is our opinion that the latter recourse will prove prohibitive, but we will
have to await an architectural opinion to make a definite determination.


WRA/bg







HISTORIC ST. AUGUSTINE PRESERVATION BOARD

M E M 0 R A N D U M

July 21, 1982


TO: PLANNING COMMITTEE

FROM: WILLIAM R. ADAMS -

SUBJECT: Interpretation


We initiated a "self-guided" tour of the interpretive area on July 19
and we hope that it will alleviate some of the problems discussed in the
May Board meeting.

Other steps taken to increase interpretive activity and public visibility
are:

1. A blacksmith shop is being constructed as an interpretive activity in the
de Hita yard.

2. The de Hita and Gonzales buildings have been integrated into the program.
We are actively recruiting a potter skilled in colonial technique to work
in the Gonzales building.

3. Fencing has been installed in front of the de Burgo Pellicer house and
other areas.

4. We are opening the area (doors, windows, etc.) to increase visibility,
and we are placing a number of free standing descriptive signs within
the area but visible to passersby that will provide direction to the
ticket window.

At its.May meeting the Board asked that the Planning Committee discuss
the interpretive program. Among items for discussion are:

1. Present interpretive format, including themes, crafts, and buildings.

2. Need to enhance or increase visibility.

3. The problem of identity, particularly name.

4. Building uses.


WRA/bg




University of Florida Home Page
© 2004 - 2010 University of Florida George A. Smathers Libraries.
All rights reserved.

Acceptable Use, Copyright, and Disclaimer Statement
Last updated October 10, 2010 - - mvs