• TABLE OF CONTENTS
HIDE
 Table of Contents
 Main














Title: Research news you can use
ALL VOLUMES CITATION PDF VIEWER THUMBNAILS PAGE IMAGE ZOOMABLE
Full Citation
STANDARD VIEW MARC VIEW
Permanent Link: http://ufdc.ufl.edu/UF00093709/00011
 Material Information
Title: Research news you can use
Physical Description: Serial
Language: English
Creator: Department of Family, Youth and Community Sciences, Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences, University of Florida
Publisher: Department of Family, Youth and Community Sciences, Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences, University of Florida
Place of Publication: Gainesville, Fla.
Publication Date: Spring 2008
 Record Information
Bibliographic ID: UF00093709
Volume ID: VID00011
Source Institution: University of Florida
Holding Location: University of Florida
Rights Management: All rights reserved by the source institution and holding location.

Downloads

This item has the following downloads:

RNYCUspr09 ( PDF )


Table of Contents
    Table of Contents
        Page 1
    Main
        Page 2
        Page 3
        Page 4
        Page 5
        Page 6
        Page 7
        Page 8
        Page 9
        Page 10
        Page 11
        Page 12
        Page 13
        Page 14
        Page 15
        Page 16
Full Text









Research News You Can Use

Spring 2008




Contents
Where You Stand Depends on Where You Sit: Participation and Reactions to Change ............................ 2

Teens Romantic Relationships & Sexual Behavior: Media Influences "Over and Above" Parents and Peers
................. ...... .. ..................... ................................... ............................................................... 4

Overview of Current Housing Situation in Florida ........................................ .................................. 7

Child Trend's Ten Reasons to Still Focus on Teen Childbearing......................... ............................ 9

How Intentional Are Your Program Designs for Youth Outcomes?........................... ........................ 10

Presence of Certified Kitchen Managers in restaurant facilities may be protective against certain critical
violations during restaurant inspection ................................................... ..................................... 13

Are nonresidential fathers involved with their children?............................................. ...................... 14












Where You Stand Depends on Where You Sit: Participation and Reactions to Change.
Nancy Winemiller Basinger and Jessica Romine Peterson. Nonprofit Management and
Leadership, vol 19, no. 2, Winter 2008. P. 243 257.
Submitted by Elizabeth Bolton.

Introduction
This article examines the effects of participation on the implementation of change. It presents the
perspectives of stake holders in two nonprofit arts organizations as they seek to merge. The merger of
nonprofit organizations is happening frequently as the number of organizations increase and the
resources to support them dwindle. In this study a merger is defined as one form of major
organizational change.

Methodology
The study of the merger of the two art organizations illustrates how the view of the stakeholders
was directly influenced by their access to information. Open communications are always thought to be
highly desirable, especially during organizational change and the decision to exclude stake holders led to
conflict among the two merged groups. Data were gathered through interviews conducted with
stakeholder group representatives of the two merging arts organization. The background leading to the
merger stemmed from declining revenues for both organizations. Mergers of symphonies and opera
organizations are rare and only three have been done in the US. The time line for the merger was rapid.
The reaction to the merger was not totally positive and there was conflict between the boards of
directors and staff at all levels.


Findings


Two perspectives emerged. One perspective, known as insiders, were from those persons who were
directly involved in the communications and the decisions. These people were board members and
management and had participated in the processes and the decision to merge the two organizations.
The other perspective was from those persons, outsiders, who had been excluded from the process and
the decision making and were overwhelmingly opposed to the merger. The merger did not make the
differences in perspective go away and they lingered long after the two organizations merged.

Participation in the decision making process was the one single factor that related to the differences
in perspective with the insiders greatly involved in the processes and decisions and the outsiders not at
all involved. The authors conclude that it is clearly inefficient to involve every stakeholder in all aspects
of a decision but that the result, although achieved with great efficiency, may well have costs beyond
those gained by the efficiency of excluding stakeholders.


Implications for Practice


Merger is just one type of major organization change. Other options include closing up and ceasing
to exist. Mergers continue to be a popular option and according the Nicole Wallace "nearly one in five
charities are considering mergers to help survive hard economic times" (p. 27). Another study showed










that for-profits merge at about the same rate. The merger rates of nonprofits varied by the type of
organization. Characteristics that make nonprofits good merger material include a high degree of
competition, the need for expensive facilities, financial distress, and a leadership crisis.


This Basinger and Peterson study is particularly timely in view of the recent plan by the Obama
administration to set up a $634-billion reserve fund over 10 years to improve the health care system in
the United States. Preston and Perry (2009) reviewed his plan and report that his planned budget for
2010 would pay for $318-billion of the fund by limiting the tax deductions on families with earnings on
more than $250,000 who choose to itemize their deductions including donations to charitable
organizations. "Taxpayers now can save the same percentage as their tax bracket. Those in the highest
tax brackets 33 percent and 35 percent-can save 33 cents or 35 cents in taxes for each dollar
donated. Mr. Obama would cap the tax break at 28 percent" (Preston and Perry, p.6).

The nonprofit sector is divided on this proposed plan with those that have chosen to voice their
concerns being opposed to this major change in the organizational funding stream. The Obama
Administration emphasizes that these changes would not take place until 2011 and the economy will
have begun its upturn before that time. Charity leaders are making a strong case against the proposal in
view of the economic crisis the country is facing and professional fundraising associations are saying that
this is the wrong time to send this message to donors.

The counter to this argument is presented by those who say that while limiting tax deductions may
depress giving, the benefit outweighs the cost of ever increasing health insurance plans. Some policy
analysts opine that such a plan would help charities by reducing the cost of proving health insurance to
45 million Americans who lack insurance. According to some, this plan would lower the tax liability on
the estates of wealthy Americans when they die. Others say this plan would harm their institution
because any benefits would not equal the loss of revenue by donors (Preston and Perry, p. 9). This
debate is not yet over and both sides make a strong case which illustrates the title of the article
reviewed here. One's reaction to change depends on one's particular situation.

This study is timely for many reasons given the current economic crisis in Florida and elsewhere in
the United States. Major organizational changes are taking place and many stakeholders -families,
employees, employers, for profit and nonprofit entities, will be affected. How involved are the
stakeholders in your community in discussions to cut spending on schools, transportation and other
critical services? What efforts are being made to inform and involve the stakeholders in decisions that
will change their lives and the services they have come to expect? According to the Basinger and
Peterson study, the rationale by the insider group to use secrecy in the negotiations and deliberations
was to protect the integrity of the process. The outsider group saw this as unfair and unnecessary. What
will be the model for change that needs to take place in your agency and organization? This article does
not propose to offer a model for organizational change or to suggest that change cannot be positive. It
does suggest that when stake holders participate in the process it will have a major effect on the
outcome and the acceptance of it.

Preston, S. & Perry, C. (March 12, 2009). A taxing proposition: Nonprofit leaders come out divided
on President Obama's plans. The Chronicle of Philanthropy. Vol. XXI, No. 10, 6-9.

Wallace, N. (March 12, 2009). One in five charities considering mergers to help survive hard
economic times. The Chronicle of Philanthropy. Vol. XXI, No. 10, 27.

















Teens Romantic Relationships & Sexual Behavior: Media Influences "Over and Above"
Parents and Peers


Kate Fogarty


Introduction


Romantic relationships are an active part of teens' social lives and contribute to their development -
both positively and negatively (Giordano, Manning, & Longmore, 2006). Romantic interests usually
emerge in the early to middle adolescent years and result in teens' increased concern with the social
image they project to potential romantic partners (Giordano et al., 2006; Kobus, 2003). In molding their
social images in order to attract a romantic partner, girls are more likely to focus on physical appearance
such as body image whereas boys emphasize their physical achievements such as sports (Michell &
Amos, 1997-in Giordano et al., 2006). Forming social images is not only a part of dating and courtship,
but adolescent identity formation. Through this process of forming both self and social images, teens
have potential to become involved in problem behaviors (Giordano et al., 2006) as well as positive,
prosocial ones.

Families, parents and peers are likely to influence teens as they form their social images and perceptions
of attractiveness to a potential romantic partner. Fortunately, parents have stronger influence than
peers on problematic outcomes in dating (Doyle et al., 2003). Of greater concern, however, is that
various forms of media have been found to be a "super peer" in educating teens on romantic and sexual
behavior (Chernin & Fishbein, 2007; L'Engle, Brown, & Kenneavy, 2006). In fact, when it comes to teens'
sexual behavior, media has been found to have influence that goes above and beyond that of parents
(L'Engle et al., 2006). Young teens may be especially vulnerable to the influence of media due to a lack
of direct romantic and sexual experience (Eggermont, 2004). And, media is considered a prime source of
"sexual socialization" (L'Engle, Brown, & Keanneavy, 2006) for adolescents as surveys support that 90-
95% of teens learn from television and movies about romantic love (deSouza & Sherry, 2006).


Media and Teens' Sexual Behavior


Research on media influence and teens includes findings that exposure to media with sexual content has
a 'causal' effect on teens' sexual behavior, this is especially true with exposure to music and movies
(Pardun, L'Engle, & Brown, 2005); also, teens who are sexually active tend to seek out media with sexual
content (Bleakley, Hennessy, Fishbein, & Jordan, 2008). And, early studies in the 1980s found that teens
who spent more time watching television (Ward, Gorvine, & Walker, 2002):

were less accepting of their lack of sexual experience
were less likely to enjoy early sexual experiences










estimated their friends' number of sexual experiences as higher
reported starting having sex earlier



Media and Teens' Romantic Relationships


Beyond sexual themes, teens' exposure to media with romantic tones has powerful effects. Content
analyses of prime time television and contemporary music indicate frequent references to dating and
intimacy, e.g., about twenty times an hour in TV programs most watched by teens (Eggermont, 2004). A
content analysis of prime-time preferred teen television programs revealed that less healthy ways to
handle conflict (avoidance and talking to others about a problem) in romantic relationships prevailed,
although less than half (46%) of the romantic couples ever experienced conflict and the majority of
conflicts (83%) ended in positive resolution (deSouza & Sherry, 2006). Romantic-based media was found
to influence teens' unrealistic beliefs about romantic relationships for both males and females (Chernin
& Fishbein, 2007). Unrealistic beliefs include the existence of "soul mates" and that romantic partners
should intuitively sense one another's thoughts and feelings (Chernin & Fishbein, 2007). A teenage girl,
for example, might think the purpose of dating, even in her teen years, is to find a "soul mate". Or an
adolescent male might value or perceive a romantic partner as knowing exactly what he is thinking and
feeling. Additional media-linked beliefs that teens have about romantic relationships divide the sexes;
teen boys who watch a lot of television, in comparison to peers who watch less TV, find physical
attractiveness to be most important in a romantic partner, whereas teen girls who engage in heavy TV
viewing are less concerned about attractiveness and feel that romantic partners having a pleasant
personality matters most (Eggermont, 2004).

Romantic "conceptions" strongly influence a teen's views of romantic interactions and can lead to
frustration and relationship dissatisfaction (Eggermont, 2004). Having unrealistic beliefs about romantic
relationships and sexuality potentially leads teens to disappointment and problems. We may imagine a
teen boy devastated by a breakup for reasons unknown, when his girlfriend seemed to be in tune with
his every thought and feeling. If a teen believes her boyfriend is her soul mate, she may become sexually
involved with him. Media that is laden with references to dating and intimacy portrays an expectation
that soul mates -or any type of dating relationship be sexually intimate. In fact, teens who perceived
media as promoting their sexual activity, in other words granting them permission to do so, were also
likely to seek out sexual encounters (L'Engle et al., 2006). And analysis of data from a longitudinal
school-based study of over 600 ninth graders indicated that the top three reasons teens engaged in oral
sex were: (1) pleasure (primarily for males); (2) to improve the relationship (females); and (3)
popularity/reputation (females) (Cornell & Halpern-Felsher, 2006). Although media was reported as the
least important reason for teens' having oral sex in the study, we can only speculate that girls' beliefs
that a sexual act makes the relationship closer was a result of peer and media influence. The association
between romantic relationships and sexual behavior portrayed in the media and the influence of such
association on teen relationships needs greater inquiry.


Positives on Media


On the positive side, media can be a source of positive and veritable information for teens. Principles of
mass media theory support that the more realistic the portrayal of romantic and sexual situations, the










more powerful the influence of that media (Eggermont, 2004). Granted reality television shows such as
the Bachelor may not be a good source of dating information for teens! Yet media that expels myths
about dating relationships (public service announcements, television shows) and provides accurate
information about sexuality (blogs and online teen bulletin boards monitored by public health
professionals) provides great promise (Suzuki & Calzo, 2004).


Suggestions for Parents & Youth Workers/Implications: Limit Teens SMDs


Overall, parents and youth workers must consider limiting and monitoring the SMD or "sexual media
diet" of teens. SMD has been shown to be linked with teens' intentions to have sex "in the near future"
(L'Engle, et al., 2006, p. 191). And in a study of over 1,000 teens in the seventh and eighth grades, about
11% of the media they consumed contained sexual content (Pardun et al., 2005). And in that study, SMD
was significantly linked with young teens' sexual activity or intentions to have sex. Practical advice for
parents to reduce teens' SMD includes:
Keeping televisions in the living room and out of teens' bedrooms;
Limiting online access to computers in central, and less private, locations;
Allowing your teen to plug her mp3 player into the living room or car stereo for a half hour (or as
long as you can tolerate) so you can join in the listening;
Watching with your teen his or her favorite television shows or movies, and refraining from
comments during this time
Asking thought (but not defense-) provoking questions of your teen, "What does this song seem
to say about dating relationships?" "How does this movie represent teens experiences today?" "What
healthy messages are you or teens in general learning from this website?"
Supporting your teen's consumption of quality print media (reconsider teen magazines that have
50% or more references to dating relationships and "how to get a guy or girl to like you")


References:


Bleakley, A., Hennessy, M., Fishbein, M., & Jordan, A. (2008). It works both ways: The relationship
between exposure to sexual content in the media and adolescent sexual behavior. Media Psychology,
11, 443-461.

Chernin, A., & Fishbein, M. (2007). The association between adolescents' exposure to romantic-
themed media and the endorsement of unrealistic beliefs about romantic relationships. Conference
proceedings from the International Communication Association 2007 Annual Meeting.

Cornell, J.L., & Halpern-Felsher, B.L. (2006). Adolescents tell us why teens have oral sex. Journal of
Adolescent Health, 38, 299-301.

de Souza, R.T. & Sherry, J.L. (2006). Portrayals of romantic relationships on adolescent television: A
content analysis. Media Report to Women, 34, 13-21.

Eggermont, S. (2004). Television viewing, perceived similarity, and adolescents' expectations of a
romantic partner. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 48, 244-265.









Giordano, P.C., Manning, W.D., & Longmore, M.A. (2006). Adolescent romantic relationships: An
emerging portrait of their nature and developmental significance. In A.C. Crouter, & A. Booth (Eds.),
Romance and Sex in Adolescence and Emerging Adulthood: Risks and Opportunities. (pp. 127-150).
Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

Kobus, K. (2003). Peers and adolescent smoking. Addiction, 98, 37-55.

L'Engle, K.L.,. Brown, J.D., & Kenneavy, K. (2006). The mass media are an important context for
adolescents' sexual behavior. Journal of Adolescent Health, 38, 186-192.

Pardun, C.J., L'Engle, K.L., & Brown, J.D. (2005). Linking exposure to outcomes: Early adolescents'
consumption of sexual content in six media. Mass Communication & Society, 8, 75-91.

Suzuki, L.K., & Calzo, J.P. (2004). The search for peer advice in cyberspace: An examination of online
teen bulletin boards about health and sexuality. Applied Developmental Psychology, 25, 685-698.

Ward, L.M., Gorvine, B., & Cytron-Walker, A. (2002). Would that really happen? Adolescents'
perceptions of sexual relationships according to prime-time television. In J.D. Brown, J.R. Steele, & K.
Walsh-Childers (Eds.), Sexual Teens, Sexual Media (pp. 95-124). London: Erlbaum.


Overview of Current Housing Situation in Florida

Michael Gutter, Hyun-Jeong Lee

During this economic downturn, Florida has been one of the hardest hit states on many fronts.
Tourism has suffered as an industry, personal investments too. However, Florida has been among
the worst hit with respect to the housing sector. Here is an overview of current situation of
Florida housing and information for foreclosure prevention.

Home Values

A recent report issued by National Association of REALTORSTM (2009) showed that home
prices in Florida have sustained substantial losses over the last two years. The Miami/Fort
Lauderdale/Miami Beach area saw a loss in median sales price of 32.3% from 4th quarter 2007
through 2008. Similar declines were also seen in other areas. Orlando metro area saw 27.1%
decline in median sales price 2007-2008; other major metropolitan areas such as Tampa Bay/St.
Petersburg/Clearwater saw similar declines. Other markets such as Gainesville, Jacksonville,
and the Panhandle all saw losses but these were less. The declining home values and lack of
marketability have contributed to the housing problems in Florida.

Home Foreclosures

The decline in home value leads to a decline in equity for many. This price decline and
subsequent utilization of Home Equity Lines of Credit have led to numerous families being
upside-down in their mortgages; owing more than their homes are worth. In addition, as of early
2008 around 12% of mortgages in Florida were adjustable-rate mortgages. The factors above









combined with a depressed economy, and changes in mortgage payments have led to a record
number of foreclosures. Florida had the second highest state total of foreclosures during 2008
with 385,309 properties having a foreclosure filing which comprises 4.52% of total housing units
in Florida compared to national average of 1.84 %. (RealtyTrac, 2009). This represented a 133%
increase from 2007 and 412% increase from 2006. This was also the 2nd highest foreclosure rate
with 1 in 22 housing units receiving a foreclosure in 2008 (RealtyTrac, 2009).

Housing Market Forecast

The forecast for Florida's housing markets remains somewhat dismal. Many analysts are
predicting a slow recovery. An analyst even predicts that foreclosures in Florida could increase
by 50 to 100 percent in 2009 (E Foreclosure Magazine, 2009). Unemployment continues to be a
problem and may increase to over 8% by some estimates. Many families have lost substantial
capital as a result of the decline in the stock market. Housing demand is not expected to pick up,
but that is only part of the issue. Many consumers with Adjustable Rate Mortgages that were
fixed for three or five years will now start to see these rates unfreeze and may find themselves
facing higher mortgage payments. This will certainly impact families for whom the budget does
not have the room for this payment increase.

President's Recovery Plan

President Obama's recovery plan does have a few promising ideas that should help in Florida.
Homeowners (with one home) who are upside in their mortgages may be able to refinance
because of funds allocated to this purpose. Lenders will be compensated for lowering rates to
help stem foreclosure for some families. Other elements included investing in projects and
infrastructure which should lead to job growth over the next few years. For more information,
please refer to an article that summarizes the President's recovery plan and eligibility to be
benefited (Reference).

How to Prevent Foreclosure

The U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) provides several articles to
guide you to prevent foreclosure:

Guide to Avoiding Foreclosure

Basically, the keys for foreclosure prevention are learning and practicing financial management
skills and timely communication with your lender. For more information how to manage your
resources wisely,

Check the following publications or consult with your local county Extension office.

How to Prevent Foreclosure on Your Home


How to Manage the Foreclosure Process










Money and Marriage: A Spending Plan


Managing in Tough Times

For information on how to communicate with your lender, please refer to the following
publications by the UF/IFAS and Federal Housing Administration (or FHA) at HUD.

You and Your Credit Series (UF/IFAS)

You may want to consult HUD approved housing counseling agency near you from this linked
list. For further resources for foreclosure prevention in Florida, please refer to this site. Avoiding
Foreclosure Florida (HUD)

Explore Loan Workout Solutions with Your Lender (FHA)

You can also consult Foreclosure-Response.org, a website maintained by the Center for Housing
Policy, KnowledgePlex, Local Initiatives Support Corporation (LISC), and the Urban Institute,
for more resources on foreclosures.

References

E Foreclosure Magazine (2009, January 24). Florida Foreclosures Could Increase by 100 Percent
in 2009. Retrieved from RealtyTrac (2009).

Foreclosure Activity Increases 81 percent in 2008. Retrieved from National Association of
REALTORS (2009).

Median Sales Price of Existing Single-Family Homes for Metropolitan Areas Retrieved
from Realtor.org




Child Trend's Ten Reasons to Still Focus on Teen Childbearing
Joy Jordan

Recent news of the rise of the nation's teenage birth rate in 2006 and 2007 has spurred renewed
concerns about the issue of "kids having kids" on the part of parents, policy makers, service providers,
researchers and others. For teens becoming parents, they face formidable obstacles on the road to a
better life for themselves and their children. Child Trends recently gave these reasons to continue to
focus on this issue within our communities:
1. The human costs of teen childbearing are substantial, both for the children and for their parents.
Compared to children born to older mothers, children of teenage mothers are more likely to have a low birth
weight and be born prematurely. These children are at higher risk academically and behaviorally in school. Sons of
teenage mothers are also more likely to end up in prison.
Compared to women who delay childbearing, teen mothers are more likely to drop out of school and to never
graduate. These mothers are more likely to live off public assistance and live in poverty.











2. The financial costs of teen childbearing are stark.
In 2004, researchers estimated that the total public cost of teen childbearing was $9.2 billion a year, including
the costs associated with medical care, child welfare, incarceration, and the loss of tax revenue.
Conversely, during the steady decline between 1991 to 2005 saved tax payers and estimated$6.7 billion in
2004 alone.
3. Most teens who gave birth did not intend to have a baby.
In 2001, the data revealed that 82% if teen pregnancies were unintended with 40% of these resulting in an
abortion and 42% in live births.
4. In 2007, 1 out of 10 births (451,263) in the US were to were teens, with the majority to older 18-19 year
old teens.
Thirty-one percent of teen births were to 15-17 year olds.
Two percent were to teens under the age of 15.
Births to teens still in school are linked to high rates of school drop-out.
5. The U.S. continues to have higher teen birth rates than do other industrialized nations.
6. Seventeen states, concentrated in the Sun Belt, including Florida, had particularly high teen birth rates in
2006. Florida, however, was among the lower tier with birth rates range from 45 to 49 per 1000 women compared
to the high of 68 per 1000.
7. One in five teen births is to a teen who has already had a baby.
In 2007, of the total teen births, 16 percent were teens with one child, and another 3 percent were to teens
with 2 or more children.
8. Having a baby is more common among teens with more family disadvantages.
On average, the probability of a teen giving birth is 18 percent, based on 2006 data. Teens living in single-
parent households, who family is in a lower socio-economic status, with mother who had her first child as a
teenager, are at increased risk to having a baby as a teen.
In contrast, teens from families where parents are still together when the teen was 14 years of age, have a
substantially lower risk. In 2002, 15% of teens from two-parent families had a baby compared to 26 percent of
those who did not live with both parents.
9. The vast majority of teen births in the U.S. occur outside of marriage.
84 % of teen births in 2006 occurred outside of marriage.
Among teens that do marry, their marriages tend to be short-lived. Teens who do not marry, subsequently
show higher risk of having a child with another partner later in life and are less likely to marry.
10. After 14 years of decline, the teen birth rate increased in 2006 and 2007.

It is unknown whether this current rise is due to statistical blip or is an indicator of a longer-term trend,
however, it is proposed that we cannot lose focus on this issue to address the audience and their needs within our
communities. In this context, the research brief from Child Trends identified several populations that are at
greater risk that could benefit from programs:
Teens coping with family disadvantages ( lower parental education, intergenerational patterns of youth
parenthood, growing up within a single-parent family);
Middle school as well as high school teens (with positive youth development approaches);
Teens who have already had a child;
Teens in racial/ethnic minority and immigrant populations.
Teens in Sun Belt states, including Florida.
For more information on this topic see: http://www.childtrends.org/Files/Child Trends-
2009 04 01 RB KeepingFocus.pdf






How Intentional Are Your Program Designs for Youth Outcomes?

Joy Jordan











Applying research to practice is what Extension outreach programs are about. Within youth
development programs this means the application of a theory of developmental intentionality (Walker,
et al,2005). Simply put, this means you focus on the design and daily implementation of effective
learning opportunities for young people. This theory is built on three fundamental precepts---
intentionality, engagement and goodness of fit.

First, intentionality---deliberate, strategic decisions to create opportunities to maximize developmental
outcomes are your responsibility as the educator, or to instill this process into volunteers' roles as they
work with youth. 4-H youth development program outcomes are more than just random occurrences.
The programs should be designed with very strategic intent. However, it might not be so unusual to find
programs such as an after-school program or a summer camp program that does not have the clearly
defined elements that would produce the intended outcomes. For example, if the goal and intent for
camp counselors or other young youth leaders is to gain experience in leading and facilitating groups, do
we prepare them well and then design the experiences for them to actually practice intended skills? Or,
do we provide minimal preparation and then assign them to be a "group leader" for the cabin, camp
fire, or bathroom detail. Is this really the roles that will produce the intent? Yes, it takes more time,
effort and energy from volunteers and staff to allow youth the opportunities to do more but the
outcome is greater. Results from Duda (2009) of the Florida 4-H Camp Counselors revealed that those
young people who not only were prepared by training programs for their counselor roles, but had the
chance to practice such roles during camp, had higher scores on their perceived skill development than
those youth that did not get such practice. Findings also revealed that we often use the same teens that
have been actively engaged over time with the program rather than engaging younger, less experienced
youth. While this may seem the most obvious to produce the best results for all youth at camp, we miss
the intentional results...if we are truly looking for developmental growth and development of all
counselors. It also produces retention problems when counselors do not return. If your camp
counselors are varied in age and experience, one approach to provide for more intentional
development of younger counselors is to define clear and specific roles for them, prepare them for
these roles and let them do the job...maybe partner an older counselor in some situations to be there to
support the effort if needed. Define other roles for the more experienced counselors.

A very positive example of developmental intentionality is the counties participating in the Engaging
Youth, Serving Communities Grants, where teens are partnering with adults to learn to facilitate
community forums on issues like childhood of obesity. Results of change in youth assessments of their
teaching, leading and other empowerment skills were dramatic as a result of these intentional and
intensive programs. Our society often is more supportive of our "do to" or "do for" approaches rather
than valuing the more developmental process of doing with" that may result in the less than perfect
bake sale, fair exhibit, or other such event.

Engagement is the second key to the higher level outcomes and success of either leaning outcomes ( i.e.
subject matter content) or youth developmental outcomes ( confidence to speak in public, decision-
making skills). 4-H has intentionally designed opportunities for youth to become engaged within
learning experiences. As you prepare for programs think about these best practices to youth
engagement:
Are you maximizing the level of experiential engagement of youth in the learning the
subject matter skills and knowledge? Or, are you talking at them a lot more than
engaging them in the 4-H "learn by doing" process? Also, did you stop at the end of the










"doing" without processing and helping youth learn from the experiences...what
worked, did not work, and why and how?
Are you intentionally sequencing youth opportunities for multiple levels of
engagement? Research evidence supports that the more levels of youth engagement
the more likely they attain the skill levels intended. Youth programs need to design and
provide the sequenced, multiple opportunities.
What level of engagement is being provided through interaction with adults in a positive
and supportive manner? Again, research evidence supports that the level of support and
adult interaction helps develop and build higher skill levels among youth (Forgarty et al,
2008).
Goodness of fit among all the program elements and the needs of youth is the third key to success
(Walker,2006). Think about these questions relating to best practice:

Are you building on the basic needs of the youth being targeted? Fundamental needs of
middle years include the need to develop self-worth through meaningful contributions,
to experiment in a safe and supportive environment to discover self; to develop
signification peer and adult relationships, discuss conflicting values to form their own,
and feel pride and confidence in their own mastery and independence. Within programs
are you intentionally meeting these needs for belonging, mastery, independence and
generosity?
Are you providing choice and flexibility within the program? If program opportunities,
recognition or rewards do not offer some choice and flexibility, most likely youth will
cease to be engaged.
Are you creating or partnering with youth? Active and effective youth-adult partnerships
encourage valuing the contributions of youth as well as adults within the program. This
is the ultimate active learning environment for youth development.
Are you situating learning in everyday life? Living and learning are not separate and
experiences that promote real work, service and contributions to family, community
and the organization are most appealing to youth in the middle years.

In summary, our goal is to make the best better for youth developmental outcomes. However, to do this
requires us to continue to take the time to put research-evidenced best practices to work as we think
about our programs. All programs benefit from scrutiny regarding the content, the process and methods
of engagement and the environments that involve and support youth development.


Resources
Duda, S. (2009) Leadership and Group Facilitation Skills in Florida 4-H Camp Counselors, Masters'
Thesis, Department of Family, Youth and Community Sciences, University of Florida.

Fogarty, K., Terry, B. Pracht, D and J. Jordan (2009) Organizational supports and youth life skill
development: Adult volunteers as mentors, managers, and "mediators". Submitted manuscript for
Journal of Youth Development.

Walker, J. (2006) Intentional Youth Programs: Taking Theory to Practice. New Directions for Youth
Development, No. 112, Winter pp. 75-92. Published online in Wiley InterScience
(www.interscience.wiley.com)












Walker, J, Marczak, M. Blyth, D and L Borden, "Designing Youth Development Programs: Toward a
Theory of developmental Intentionality" in Organized Activities as Contexts of Development:
Extracurricular Activities, After-school and Community Programs By Joseph L. Mahoney, Reed Larson,
Jacquelynne S. Eccles, Published by Routledge, 2005 ISBN 0805844309


Presence of Certified Kitchen Managers in restaurant facilities may be protective against
certain critical violations during restaurant inspection.
Amy Simonne
According to the CDC, significant numbers of foodborne illness outbreaks in the United States are
attributed to restaurants. Many states in the United States have a mandatory requirement for
restaurant and food services managers to be food safety certified. Whether or not the mandatory food
safety certification of food/kitchen manager is effective in preventing foodborne illness outbreak, the
question continues to be debatable. A recent study by Cates et al. (2009) using inspection data in the
state of Iowa from 2005-2006 presents another insight into the subject.


Methodology


The researchers analyzed data for 4,461 restaurants in Iowa that were inspected during 2005-2006
(8,338 inspections). They classified the inspection outcomes into two categories a) no critical violation,
and b) having one or more critical violations. Then they used logistic regression analysis of the
inspection outcomes as a function of presence or absence of certified kitchen managers (certified food
managers) and other explanatory variables. According to the State of Iowa Department of Inspection
and Appeals, the food service inspection routine check list consisted of seven categories with a total of
44 points. The seven categories includes 1) Food Temperature/Time control, 2) Personnel, 3) Food
Source/Handling, 4) Warewashing, 5) Plumbing/Water/Sewage, 6) Facility/Equipment Requirements,
and 7) Other Operations such as pest control and security plans, just to name a few.


Results
Among significant findings for this study, the researchers found that restaurants with a certified
kitchen manager present during the inspection were less likely to have a critical violation for personnel,
food source or handling, facility or equipment requirements, warewashing, and other operations.
However, there was no difference among restaurants in their likeliness to have critical violations for
temperature and time control and plumbing, water, or sewage with or without a presence of the kitchen
managers (food managers). Within the category of time/temperature control type of violations, it
appeared that a presence of food/kitchen manager during the inspection resulted into fewer violations
for hot holding, but not other types of holding. In addition, the numbers of critical violations among
restaurants also depends on the size and the complexity of the operations; it appeared that the bigger
and the more comprehensive the restaurants are more likely for them to have more critical violation
due to the fact that they prepared and hold more foods. Certain critical violations can be addressed
more easily by simple training of employees, while other critical violations such as plumbing and sewage
or other may need modification of infrastructure. Most certified kitchen managers are knowledgeable










about the correlation of foodborne illnesses and risk factors and their presence in the restaurants can
improve quality of employee training.

Overall, this study concluded that presence of the kitchen managers/food manager can be protective
against most critical violations.

This article is prepared by A.H. Simonne from a recent publication
M.A. Panne C. N. Stone, .E. Harrison and V. Radke. 2009. Critical Kitchen Manaes: Do they improve
restaurant inspection outcomes? Food Protection. 72(2):384-391.



Are nonresidential fathers involved with their children?

Suzanna Smith
Amato, P. R., Meyers, C. E., & Emery, R. E. (2009). Changes in Nonresident father-child contact
from 1976-2002. Family Relations, 58, 41-53.

Introduction
Divorce impacts an estimated one million children each year (Amato, 2000; Krieder, 2004), and children
"enter new living arrangements" (Kelly, 2006, p. 35) as parents establish new households, custody, and
visitation patterns. In decades past, children of divorcing parents as well as children of unmarried
parents (Ryan, Kalil, & Ziol-Guest, 2008), often completely lost contact with the nonresidential parent,
usually their fathers. However, changing cultural expectations about appropriate father roles carry the
expectation that nonresidential fathers will not only offer financial support but also stay involved in their
children's lives (Amato, 2009), and there is some evidence that in recent years, nonresident fathers have
been more likely to see their children (Kelly, 2006). This study looked at whether nonresidential fathers'
contact with their children increased in the past three decades, and if so, what accounted for an
increase.

Methodology
The researchers compiled data from 4 national surveys conducted in 1976 (the National Survey of
Children), 1987-1988 (the National Survey of Families and Households), 1996 (the National Longitudinal
Survey of Youth), and 2002 (the National Survey of America's Families), collected from over 350 to over
3,300 mothers, depending on the study year. Mothers' reports of fathers' involvement with children
ages 6-12 included how often the father was in contact with the child, his payment of child support,
whether children were born within marriage, and demographic variables. Data were "weighted to be
nationally representative [of the study population] within each year" (p. 47).

Main Ideas
In the past three decades, nonresidential fathers' "contact rose significantly" (p. 41). In 1976, 18% of
nonresident fathers saw their children weekly, compared to 31%in 2002. The percentage of fathers who
not only "saw their children weekly" but "also paid child support" (p. 49) increased, from 8% in the
1970s to 26% in the 2000s. Fathers were more likely to have contact with their children when they paid
child support. Being married at the time the child was born also increased the frequency of father
contact.










However, although fathers' contact with their children increased, most "nonresident fathers did not see
their children every week," at least according to reports from children's mothers. Nearly 30% of
children (29%) did not see their fathers at all in 2002, and 43% "did not receive any child support in the
previous year" (Amato, 2009, p. 50). All and all, 22% of nonresident fathers, including those who have
divorced or had their children outside of marriage, do not visit their children nor pay child support
(Amato, 2009).

Frequent father contact is not always in the child's best interests, when there is a history of abuse,
substance abuse, or extreme mother-father conflict, for example. But most children would reap
psychological and economic benefits from nonresidential father-contact and child support.

Implications for Extension Programs

The researchers point out that a number of policies, programs, and interventions have the goal of
strengthening ties between fathers and their children. Looking specifically at Florida, the State's family
courts mandate a "parenting plan" (formerly visitation and child custody) to address how parents will
share the responsibility for the child's daily care health care, school matters, and other activities; and
require parents to agree on a time-sharing schedule. In addition, parent education classes required for
Florida's divorcing parents emphasize the importance of continued involvement from both parents after
divorce.

Some county faculty offer, or plan to offer, these four-hour programs to divorcing parents in their
judicial circuits. (For amendments to language pertaining to parenting arrangements after marital
dissolution see Florida Senate Chapter 20 and for statutes regarding parent education see Chapter
21 http://www.flsenate.gov/cgi-
bin/view page.pl?File=sb2532er.html&Directory=session/2008/Senate/bills/billtext/html&Tab=session
&Submenu=l)

County faculty can also offer parent education programs to nonresidential fathers by working with
agencies focusing on Responsible Fatherhood programs (for locations
see http://www.aahmi.net/pdfs/statemaps/Florida.pdf). For a summary of these programs see the
National Fatherhood Clearinghouse and HHS reports, in the links in the references section.

An EDIS publication on nonresidential fatherhood provides suggestions for ways fathers can stay
involved: http://edis.ifas.ufl.edu/HE139. Another publication summarizes the important roles fathers
play in children's lives: http://edis.ifas.ufl.edu/HE140

Conclusion
In summary, while nonresidential fathers' involvement has increased after divorce and separation in
recent decades, most fathers still do not have regular contact with their children. Changes in policies,
programs, and divorce agreements can encourage fathers to stay involved, be there for their children,
and provide for them financially. Extension education programs offer fathers strategies for staying
involved.

Additional References
Amato, P. R. (2000). The consequences of divorce for adults and children, Journal of Marriage and
the Family, 62, 1269-1287.











Kelly, J.B. (2006). Children's living arrangements following separation and divorce: Insights from
empirical and clinical research. Family Process, 46(1), 35-52.

Krieder, R. (2003). Living arrangements of children: 2004. Washington, DC: U.S. Census Bureau.
Retrieved March 11, 2009 from http://www.census.gov/prod/2008pubs/p70-114.pdf

Ryan, R. M., Kalil, A. & Ziol-Guest, K. M. (2008). Longitudinal patterns of nonresident fathers'
involvement: The role of resources and relations. Journal of Marriage and Family, 70, 962-977.

National Responsible Fatherhood Clearinghouse. Responsible Fatherhood State Profile : Florida.
Retrieved March 13, 2009
from http://basis.caliber.com/cwig/ws/library/docs/fatherhd/ResultSet?upp=0&rpp=-
10&w=NATIVE('TI+ph+is+"Responsible+Fatherhood+State+Profile+%3A+Florida'')&r=1&order=native('y
ear%2FDescend').

National Responsible Fatherhood Clearinghouse. Retrieved March 13, 2009
from http://www.fatherhood.gov/index.cfm.

U.S. Department of health and Human Services. Promoting Responsible Fatherhood. Retrieved
March 13, 2009 from http://fatherhood.hhs.gov/.




University of Florida Home Page
© 2004 - 2010 University of Florida George A. Smathers Libraries.
All rights reserved.

Acceptable Use, Copyright, and Disclaimer Statement
Last updated October 10, 2010 - - mvs