• TABLE OF CONTENTS
HIDE
 Title Page
 Main
 Literature cited
 Figure 1. Home hydroponic...






Group Title: Department of Soils mimeo report
Title: Florida sawdust for home hydroponics
CITATION THUMBNAILS PAGE IMAGE ZOOMABLE
Full Citation
STANDARD VIEW MARC VIEW
Permanent Link: http://ufdc.ufl.edu/UF00091539/00001
 Material Information
Title: Florida sawdust for home hydroponics
Alternate Title: Department of Soils mimeo report 59-1 ; University of Florida
Physical Description: 9, 1 leaves : ill. ; 28 cm.
Language: English
Creator: Edson, Seton N
University of Florida -- Dept. of Soils
University of Florida -- Agricultural Experiment Station
Publisher: Department of Soils, Florida Agricultural Experiment Stations
Place of Publication: Gainesville, Fla.
Publication Date: November 10, 1958
 Subjects
Subject: Hydroponics -- Florida   ( lcsh )
Wood waste as mulch, soil conditioner, etc   ( lcsh )
Genre: government publication (state, provincial, terriorial, dependent)   ( marcgt )
bibliography   ( marcgt )
non-fiction   ( marcgt )
 Notes
Statement of Responsibility: by Seton N. Edson.
Bibliography: Includes bibliographical references (leaf 9).
General Note: Cover title.
General Note: "November 10, 1958."
 Record Information
Bibliographic ID: UF00091539
Volume ID: VID00001
Source Institution: University of Florida
Holding Location: University of Florida
Rights Management: All rights reserved by the source institution and holding location.
Resource Identifier: oclc - 310370832

Table of Contents
    Title Page
        Title Page
    Main
        Page 1
        Page 2
        Page 3
        Page 4
        Page 5
        Page 6
        Page 7
        Page 8
    Literature cited
        Page 9
    Figure 1. Home hydroponic bench
        Page 10
Full Text













DEPARTMENT OF SOILS MIMEO REPORT NO, 59-1


FLORIDA SAWDUST FOR HOME HYDROPONICS
by
Seton N. Edson


Department of Soils
Florida Agricultural Experiment Stations
Gainesville, Florida


November 10, 1958


k 0







-1-


Department of Soils
Agricultural Experiment Station
University of Florida


FLORIDA SAWDUST FCR HOME HYDROPONICS

Seton N, Edson
Associate Professor of Soils


In the year 1860, Sachs (5) made the following statements "I

published the results of experiments which demonstrated that land plants

are capable of absorbing their nutritive matters out of watery solutions,

without the aid of soil, and that it is possible in this way not only

to maintain plants alive and growing for a long period of time, as had

long been known, but also to bring about a vigorous increase of their

organic substance, and even the production of seed capable of germination."

This marked the earliest published water culture method for growing

plants without soil. Obviously, hydroponics or soilless growth, had a

very early beginning. The only real change over the years has been in

methods and formulas. It is interesting to know that Sachs (5) germ-

inated his seed in clean washed sawdust and transplanted the young plants

in a nutrient solution. Since his studies were in plant physiology,

water culture, with pure salts, was a necessity.

In 1938, Hoagland and Arnon (2) published their bulletin on water

culture methods for growing plants without soil. A seed bed of rice

hulls, sawdust, or shavings was suspended over the nutrient solution.

The plant roots grew in the sawdust, passed through the one inch air

space, and also grew in the nutrient solution. Their technique gave

excellent results with a wide variety of plants. After it was shown by

these hydroponic methods that sawdust showed little if any decomposition







-2-

after the termination of the average growing season, then many amateur

gardeners began to use common sawdust as a medium in several kinds of

containers. Kept moist, and treated with a soluble salt solution, these

methods grew very satisfactory plants. This pleasant hobby made fast

progress in Florida in recent years because no greenhouse or expensive

protective cover were necessary.

Numerous inquiries are received each year by the University of

Florida from home gardeners for a simple hydroponic method for growing

plants. The most frequent request is for a convenient and simple means

of obtaining the necessary nutrient salts to make up one of the many

formulas that are obtainable. This imposes several important compli-

cations for the beginner, some of which he will understand and others

which may cause complete failure of his hydroponic venture. A typical

example is found in the use of some of the high analysis soluble fertil-

izers available for making liquid fertilizers.

These fertilizers must have fairly pure salts in their mixture to

attain a high analysis rating. Several of these high analysis soluble

fertilizers have had to skimp on certain essential elements to crowd

the necessary nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium into the formula,

or they may be omitted entirely. The most common element generally

left out or reduced in amount is calcium, yet this element is essential

in a high degree. Since calcium forms few desirable soluble salts that

remain dry and stable over a period of time, it does not lend itself to

total soluble fertilizer mixtures.

Plants will not succeed in hydroponic growth if all fifteen essential

elements are not present in some form or other in the formula. To meet

this problem it was decided to use an easily obtainable 8-8-8 mixed fer-

tilizer which w uld carry a plentiful supply of calcium in the super-








-3-

phosphate of the mixture. The only additional elements added were

magnesium, potassium, and iron. Potassium was added in order to change

the 1-1-1 ratio to a 1-1-2o Other essential elements should be present

as impurities. The ratio of 1-1-2 closely parallels a few of the more

successful hydroponic formulas that have been used to date in this area.

Florida has little or no native gravel fit for a good hydroponic

medium. Sand was ruled out due to its unfavorable property of packing

plus the accumulation of algae in the pore space. Florida does have an

enormous supply of waste sawmill sawdust. This article is an endeavor

to present a choice of two simple yet satisfactory means of using saw-

mill sawa.ust and common commercial mixed fertilizer for home hydroponic

growth of vegetables. These methods are compared with each other and

with other salt formulas in order to demonstrate their feasibility.


THE HYDROPONIC BENCH

A location was selected where some afternoon shade could be expected.

Four treated posts were sunk into the ground leaving about two feet of

post exposed above ground. These were spaced about eight feet in length

and wide enough to fit six boards. Using 1" x 6" No. 2 treated boards

eight feet long, a bench was fashioned so that the six boards exactly

fitted in between the two posts (see Fig. 1), and rested on a cross

member of similar material. The sides and end were two boards high

(about 11" deep). Although this experimental bench was only one section,

or eight feet long, the length may be as long as desired.

The bench was lined with a single sheet of polyethylene plastic

with the top edge tacked down. In the water culture bench, a pipe was

fitted in the bottom to allow for draining as well as keeping a constant

level of solution (Fig. 1). The drain pipe was turned up just high enough








-4-

to keep the nutrient solution at a depth of six inches. The same pipe

can be turned down to drain the solution. One inch above the level of

the nutrient solution, a 1" x 1" wood strip was nailed along the sides

and over the polyethelyene sheeting. Similar 1" x 1" crecs member strips

at about 1 foot apart were nailed to these strips. These strips acted

as supports for random pieces of common hardware cloth. A little wood

excelsior was scattered on this hardware cloth and the remaining 4 inch

depth was filled with sawmill sawdust to the top edge of the bendh.

For the dry salt method, the cross member strips were left outi

the drain was turned down to allow free drainage at all times; the bench

was filled completely with sawmill sawdust.


THE DRY SALT CULTURE METHOD

The dry salt culture method has been briefly described by both Ellis

and Swaney (1) and Laurie (4). After the bench was filled with sawdust

as described previously, the N, P, K, Ca, and S were supplied by common

8-8-8 commerical fertilizer plus additional potassium. Mg was supplied

by mixing three ounces of common epsom salts to one pound of 8-8-8 fer-

tilizer. This also supplied additional sulfur. Iron was added by a

weekly sprinkling of a teaspoon of iron sulfate dissolved in about two

gallons of water. The remaining minor elements; i.e., Mn, B, Cu, Zn,

and Mo come with the commercial fertilizer mixture as impurities.

There is no magic formula for hydroponic plant growth. If any plant

is given the above elements in the right amounts and proportions, is free

of disease, and is exposed to sufficient light and moisture, they will

grow to their optimum size and no more. Hoagland and Arnon (2) have shown

that there is no difference in food quality if all growth requirements

are met.








-5-

The dry mixed 8-8-8 plus 3 oz. each of epsom salts and sulfate of

potash were spread at the rate of 1 to 2 Ibs. per 100 sq. ft. of area,

or about 1/2 to 1 cup per 24 sq. ft. bench. Two weeks prior to planting,

the salts were soaked into the sawdust. Following this, young tomato plants

were set in the sawdust, and cucumber seeds were planted at 10 inch spacing,

leaving a strip along each side of the bench to spread the fertilizer.

In the final experiment, twelve tomato plants and twelve cucumber plants

were used.

As the plants grew, between 1/2 to 1 cup of the fertilizer was scat-

tered on the surface and along the strip free of plants every two weeks

and was immediately washed into the sawdust with the sprinkler. Every

evening about 6 P.M. the sprinkler was turned on for about five minutes

to moisten, but not leach, the sawdust. During rainy days, no water was

needed. The surface was lightly worked to keep it from packing and to

allow good aeration of the roots.

After all of the plants became well established, iron was added every

week by dissolving about one teaspoon of crude iron sulfate in a two gallon

sprinkling can filled with water and the contents sprinkled over the grow-

ing plants. Aluminum wire was stretched across the bench at various

heights in order to support the growing plants. The plants were grown

as prescribed for ordinary spring and fall conditions of light and tem-

perature.

The only treatment for pests was a sprinkling of malathion following

directions given on the bottle and used on the plants as needed.


THE WATER CULTURE METHOD

This method has been used for many years and is described in detail








-6-

by Hoagland and Arnon (2). The culture for this technique is exactly as

given for the dry salt culture method with the exception of the fertilizer

application. In the water culture procedure, one pound of the 8-8-8 plus

3 ounces each of epsom salts and sulfate of potash is poured into a gallon
(a)
jug and dissolved in tap water(a). One ounce of this stook solution is

diluted with one gallon of tap water to make the nutrient or growing

solution)

A clean 20 gallon garbage can was set near the bench and a ready sup-

ply of the growing solution kept on hand. The water culture bench was

filled as described previously with six inches of the nutrient solution

and kept at this level for two weeks. As the plants grew, the roots soon

grew into the sawdust and on down into the nutrient solution. The surface

was kept moist with the nutrient solution from the storage can; the solu-

tion in the bench was changed every two weeks.

The only remaining care was a weekly sprinkling of iron sulfate. The

addition of one half level teaspoon of iron chelate, 10-12% Fe, to the

gallon of stock solution, was found to be a satisfactory alternate proce-

dure.

During one growing season, the Purdue Formula B (6) was used in the

water culture method in order to compare yields with the methods just des-

cribed. Yields for each of these methods were compared and are given in

Tables 1 and 2.



(a) Shake well before using.
(b)
Use 2 os. of stock solution per gallon of growing solution for well
established plants in the fall and early spring.






-7-
TABLE 1

EQUIVALENT ANALYSIS OF THE TWO WATER CULTURE FORMULAS USED
S! ..... .. ppm _
Hydroponic Method Formula Used N P K Ca Mg pH

tater Culture Bench A Purdue B 84 35 195 100 48 6.0
Water Culture Bench B 1 lb. 8-8-8
+ 3 os.
MgSQ?7I12
+ 3 oz.
K K2SO4 per
128 gal. water 106 47 200 200 50 6.0




RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

Yields were accumulated and terminated at the end of 110 days of

growth. Yield data results are given in Table 2.

TABLE 2
__YIELD DATA COMPARED
112 plants 12 plants
Hydroponic Method Formula Used Lbs. of Tomatoes Lbs. of
____Cucumbers

Dry Salt Culture Method 1 lb. 8-8-8 + 3 oz.
MgSO4.7H20 + 3 oz.
K2o04 4o 20

Water Culture Purdue B Formula 65 44
fater Culture 1 lb. 8-8-8 + 3 oz.
MgSO47'H20 + 3 oz.
K2SO4 per 128 gal.
water 60 40




The water culture benches appeared to give higher yields than the

dry salt method. This may be the result of better salt concentration






-8-

in the water culture technique. Some difficulty was experienced in

keeping the sawdust moist in the dry salt bench during dry weather

spells. Results were similar when comparing the Purdue B formula with

the formula offered in this paper. However, the simplicity of using a

common fertilizer such as an 8-8-8, which can be purchased locally, is

of major importance to the home gardener. The small expense involved

is also an immediate advantage. Although an 8-8-8 plus 3 oz, of sulfate

of potash were used in this experiment to yield a 1-1-2 ratio, an 8-8-16

or similar fertilizer should give the same results.

The 1-1-2 fertilizer was excellent for fall and early spring condi-

tions. On the other hand, the 8-8-8 fertilizer, or 1-1-1 ratio, without

the extra 3 oz. of potassium, gave better growth for tomatoes in late

spring and early summer with the warmer days and longer periods of day-

light.

The use of sawmill sawdust and easily available commercial fertilizer

for hydroponic culture should appeal to the retired person who wishes to

grow plants without the necessity of complicated equipment and chemical

formulas, It should also appeal to the person who may have a small yard

with little space for a garden. It should have a special appeal for the

teacher looking for school projects in connection with the study of plant

growth. In any event, there is neither a waste of time nor money for

anyone who likes to grow plants.


200 copies










LITERATURE CITED
1. Ellis, C., and Swaney, M. W. (Revised by Tom Eastwood). Soilless
Growth of Plants. 2nd ed. Reinhold Publishing Co., N. Y.
1953.
2. Hoagland, D. R., and Arnon, D. K. The Water Culture Method for Grow-
ing Plants. Cal. Agr. Exp. Sta. (Berkley) Cir. 347. 1950.

3. Kiplinger, D. C. Growing Ornamentals, Greenhouse Crops in Gravel
Culture. Ohio Agr. Exp. Sta. Cir. 92. 1956.

4. Laurie, Alex. Soilless Culture Simplified. McGraw-Hill Book Co.,
Inc. 1940.

5. Sachs, Julius von. Lectures on the Physiology of Plants. Clarendon
Press, Oxford, England. 1887.

6. Yithrow, R. B., and Withrow, A. P. Nutriculture. Purdue Agr. Exp.
Sta. Cir. 328. 19L8.


















HOME HYDROPONIC BENCH
(l"x6" treated boards)


3" treated posts

polyethylene
lining

Drain and nutriel
level spout


sawduet ? "
. ir spoao 'IC
nutrieni 6"


Six boards wide


Cross members to support !
4" mesh hardware cloth




University of Florida Home Page
© 2004 - 2010 University of Florida George A. Smathers Libraries.
All rights reserved.

Acceptable Use, Copyright, and Disclaimer Statement
Last updated October 10, 2010 - - mvs